■^s^^ 3"^ "C BRA.RY !rrr. Diy.ision Shelf, / CX*X^ Section Shelf, Bookf v.. <=^.r , »»"*«..* 1*^"** *► tv t. THEOLOGY, SERIES OF SERMONS, IX THE O HI) Ell OF THE WESTMINSTER SHORTER CATECllISJM BY y JOHN M'DOWELL, D. D. PASTOR OF THE FIHST PHESBTTEHIAN CHURCH, ELIZABETH-TOWN, SEW-JKRSSr. IN TWO VOLUME?. VOL, IT. SU?JltlCttl:::r0Uin : PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY M. HALE. I *» DISTRICT OF JVEfV-JEBSEY, ss. /" S Be it nEMEMBf.HED, That on the twenty-seventh day of December, (L Si'" *''^ fiftieth year of the lndej)endence of the United States jjC Amer- y ica, Anno Domini 18:25, the Rev. John M'Dowell, of thi s»Ut^istrict, V«^ has deposited in thi^ i.fficf the title of a book, the right whereol he claims as author, in the words following, to wit : " Theology, in a series of Sermons, in the order of the Westminster Shorter Catechism. By John M'Dowell, D D. Pastor of the first Presbyterian f'hurch, Elizabeth-Town, New-Jersey " In conformity to the act of the (Jongress of the United States, entitled, •' ^n act for the encouragement ot learnmg, by securing the copies of maps, charts, and .bouks, to the authors and pioprietors of sucli copies, during the times therein tnentioned ;" and also to the act, entitled, " An act sup])lementary to an act, en- titled an act for the encouiagement of learning, by securing the copies of maps, charts, and books, to the authorf and pioprietors of such copies, during the limes thtrein mentioned, and extending the benefits thereof to the arts of designing, etching and engraving historical and other prints " WM PENNINGTON derk of the District of J^e-w-Jerseij. I CONTENTS. SERiMOV LII. DEATH. PAOE. Hebrews ix. 27. First clause, ........ 9 SERMON LIIl. THE RESURRECTION. Acts xxiv. 15, ir SERMON LIV. JUDGMENT. Romans xiv. 10. Last clause, 2r SERMON LV. JUDGMENT. Romans xiv. 10. Last clause, ; . . 35 SERMON LVI. HELL. Matthew xxv. 46. First clause, 45 SERMON LVIL HEAVEN. Matthew xxv. 46. Last clause, ....... 54 SERMO>J LVIII. OBEDIENCE. Deuteronomy v. 33. First clause, ....... 63 SERMON LIX. PREFACE TO THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. Exodus XX. 2 74i SERMON LX. DUTIES REQUIRED IN THE FIRST COMMANDMENT. Exodus XX. 3 83 SERMON LXL ATHEISM. Ephesians ii. 12. Last clause, 91 SERMON LXIL IDOLATRY. 1 Corinthians x. 14 99 IV CONTENTS. SERMON LXIII. THE SECONT) COMMANDMENT. page. Exodus xx. 4, 5, 6. . . - 107 SERMON LXIV. DUTIES REQUIRED IN THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. Exodus XX. 7 117 SERMON LXV. SINS AGAINST THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. Exodus XX. 7 : 126 SERMON LXVI. PROFANE SWEARING. Matthew v. 34. First clause, 134 ;. SERMON LXVII. ';; PERJURY. Leviticus xix. 12. First clause, 144 SERMON LXVIII. THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. Exodus XX. 8, 9, 10, 11 153 SERMON LXIX. THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. Exodus XX. 8, 0, 10, 11 163 SERMON LXX. THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. Exodus XX. 8, 9, 10, 11 172 SERMON LXXI. THE FIFTH COMMANDMENT— DUTIES OF CHILDREN TO PARENTS. Exodus XX. 12 184 SERMON LXXII. DUTIES OF PARENTS TO CHILDREN. ' Ephesians vi. 4 193 SERMON LXXIII. DUTIES OF HUSBANDS AND WIVES. Colossians iii. 18, 19 204 SERxMON LXXIV. DUTIES OF MASTERS AND SERVANTS. Ephesians vi. 5 — 9 214 SERMON LXXV. DUTIES OP RULERS AND RULED. Romans xiii. 1 224 CONTENTS. V SERMON LXXVI. DUTIES OF MINISTERS AND PEOPLE. page- 1 Thessalonians v. 12, 13 234 SERMON LXXVII. THE SIXTH COMMANDMENT. Exodus XX. 13 244 SERMON LXXVIir. DRDNKENNESS. Isaiah v. 11 254 SERMON LXXIX. HATRED. 1 John iii. 15 265 SERMON LXXX. THE SEVENTH COMMANDMENT. Exodus XX. 14 2r5 SERMON LXXXI. DUTIES OF THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. 1 Timothy v. 8 284 SERMON LXXXII. DUTIES OF THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. Micah iv. 8. Middle clause, . 292 SERMON LXXXIII. SINS AGAINST THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. Exodus XX. 15 302 SERMON LXXXIV. OPPRESSION, EXTORTION, AND USURY. Ezekiel xxii. 12. Middle clause, 311 SERMON LXXXV. NINTH COMMANDMENT. — LYING. Exodus XX. 16 322 SERMON LXXXVI. EVIL-SPEAKING. James iv. 11. First clause, ...•.•-•• 331 SERMON LXXXVII. TENTH COMMANDMENT. Exodus XX. 17 > 341 SERMON LXXXVIII. PERFECTION. I John i. 8 350 Vi CONTENTS. SERMON LXXXIX. AGGRAVATIONS OF SINS. page. Matthew xi. 23, 24 359 SERMON XC AGGRAVATIONS OF SINS. Matthew xi 23, 24. • . 369 SERMON XCI. DESERT OF SIN. Romans vi, 23. First clause. 378 SERMON XCII. MEANS OF GRACE. Proverbs viii. 34 387 SERMON XCIII. READING THE SCRIPTURES. John v. 39 396 SERMON XCIV. PREACHING THE WORD. 2 Timothy iv. 1, 2 407 SERMON XCV. HEARING THE WORD. Luke viii. 18. First clause, . 417 SERMON XCVI. THE SACRAMENTS. Romans iv. 11. First clauFe, 426 SERMON XCVII. BAPTISM.— THE MODE. Matthew xxviii. 19 ...... 435 SERMON XCVIII. INFANT BAPTISM. Matthew xxviii. 19 417 SERMON XCIX. INFANT BAPTISM. Matthew xxviii. 19 456 SERMON C. QUALIFICATIONS FOR BAPTISM. Acts ii. 38, 39 . 468 SERMON CI. QUALIFICATIONS FOR BAPTISM. Acts ii. 38, 39 477 CONTENTS. Vll SERMON CII. ADVANTAGES OF INFANT BAPTISM. page. Romans iii. I, 2 488 SERMON cm. THE LORD'S SUPPER. 1 Corinthians xi. 23, 24), 25, 26 498 SERMON CIV. QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE LORD'S SUPPER. 1 Corinthians xi. 27, 28, 29 507 SERAION CV. PRAYER. Ephesians iv. 6. Last clause, 517 SERMON CVI. THE KINDS AND SEASONS OF PRAYER. Ephesians vi. 18. First clause, 526 SERMON CVII. THE LORD'S PRAYER. Matthew vi. 9—13 536 SERMONS. SERMON LII. Hebrews ix. 27. first clause. '^And as it is appointed unto men once to die.''' THESE words present to us a solemn subject, and one in which we are all most deeply concerned. For all must die. In this warfare there is no discharge. This is as certain as that we now live. To this truth the word of God bears uniform testimony. And however little ma- ny of mankind may be affected with it, the truth itself is readily acknowledged by all ; for all have the melancho- ly proofs of it constantly before their eyes. The object of the ensuing discourse is to consider the subject of deaths in a doctrinal point of view. This doctrine is contained in our Catechism in the an- swer to the 37th question. " What benefits do believers receive from Christ at their death ? The souls of believers are at their death, made perfect in ho- liness, and do immediately pass into glory ; and their bodies be- ins: ftdl united to Christ do rest in their graves till the resurrec- iion^ This answer relates especially to believers. It suppo- ses their death ; and is principally intended to point out their condition, and the benefits which they receive from Christ, in the state of separation of the soul and body. But although the answer mentions only believers, we may suppose the death of the wicked to be implied ; and al- so their state after death, during the separation of the soul and body, previous to the resurrection. And this supposition is confirmed by the consideration that in our VOL, lU 2 10 SERMON LII. Larger Catechism, in this place, the state of the wicked., after death, is mentioned, as well as that of the righteous. We shall therefore in the ensuing discourse consider death, in reference to both the righteous and the wicked. In treating the subject we shall enquire, I. Why do believers die ? II. What is the state of the soul immediately after death ? III. What is the state of the body ? I. Why do believers die ? Death is the consequence of sin, and was denounced as a punishment for sin. It is a part of the sentence of condemnation which the law denounces for transgression. But, " there is no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus." Rom. viii.l. Why then do believers die .'^ It is certain, it is not because God could not bring his people to heaven without dying. He might consistently do this ; for Enoch and Elijah were taken there without passing through death ; and if the Lord pleased, he might consistently take more and even all of his people in the same way. However he has not pleased so to do ; but has appointed that they, as well as others, should die ; and that they should pass to glory through death. It is evident also that, although death happens to the believer in consequence of sin, yet it is not inflicted upon him as a part of the curse of the law. For Rom. viii. 1. " There is no condemnation to them which are in Chiist Jesus" — And Gal. iii. 13. "Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law being made a curse for us." Death is therefore not a curse to the believer; it is not inflicted in wrath upon him, as it is upon the wicked. But still death is painful, human nature shrinks back from it, and it is distressing to the christian. Why then must he die, seeing he is under no condemnation — is redeemed from the curse of the law — God loves him, and it would be consistent with his perfections to take him to complete blessedness in heaven, without requiring him to pass through the agonies of death ? This is a question which we must resolve into the sovereignty of God — a sove- reignty which is exercised agreeably to infinite wisdom. God has doubtless infinitely wise reasons, for what he does in this respect as well as every other. But we shall probably not be able fully to understand them, until the DEATH. i 1 plans of infinite wisdom, in bringing his chosen to glory, be fully unfolded in a future world. We msiy however ©fler some probable reasons why the people of God die. 1. God would have his children conformed to their great Head, and Forerunner Christ Jesus ; and he passed to his glory through suffering and death. And this may he one reason why God hath ordained, that believers though delivered from the curse of the law through the death of Christ, should nevertheless die, that they might be, in this respect, conformed to their great Head, and Forerunner, and pass to glory as he did through suffering and death. 2. Another reason may be, that God has not intended to make a full manifestation of his children in this world ; but has reserved such manifestation for a future world. We know from the whole of his dispensations towards his children in this world, that he does not intend fully to discover by his dealings towards them here, who are his t:hildren. " For he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sonde th rain on the just and on the un- just." Mat. V. 45. One event happeneth to all. He has intended tliat in this world, we should walk by faith, and not by sight. 2 Cor. v. 7. But if the righteous were to pass from this world to another, without dying, it would al- ways fully appear in the end, who were God's people, and who were not ; and thus the manifestation of the sons of God would take place in this world, which he has not in- tended ; and we should constantly have a kind of evidence of the truth of religion, which God has not intended to gi^ e the world. We would then walk by sight rather than by faith ; which would be altering the plan by which the Lord has intended to glorify himself in the salvation of sinners. .3. Another reason may be that believers die in mercy to his surviving people. For if believers passed into hea- ven without dying, it would always be known, when per- sons came to leave the world, whether they were chris- tians or not, and what is their future state. In this case whenever persons died, it would be certainly known that they had gone to misery. And in our present state, in the exercise of natural aff«:*ction, what dreadful disappoint- ments, would many suffer, who had entertained hopes of the piety of their friends, when they saw them die ! They would by this event assuredly know that they had gone 12 SERMON' LII. to misery. And what inexpressible pangs would many pious persons endure, to have the assurance, without any gleam of hope to the contrary, that their friends, whom they tenderly loved in this world, were forever lost, be- yond the possibility of recovery; and were then, and continually, enduring the wrath of God, without any rest, day or night ! It is true when the saints get to heaven, they will know what has become of those they loved here ; but then God will be all in all ; and a regard to his glory will so entirely fill the soul, as to prevent any pain, from a knowledge of the sufferings of those, for whom we felt a natural affection in this world. But in our present state, such knowledge would often be a source of keen, lasting, and insupportable distress ; and hence it is ordered in in- finite wisdom, that all the friends as well as the enemies of God, should die. 4. We observe again that death is a blessing to the christian. It tends to keep him humble, and promote the growth of the important grace of humility. It is cal- culated to fill him with a deeper sense of the evil of sin, than he would otherwise have, and to embitter sin to him, by which death was introduced into the world, and lead him to hate it the more. It is calculated more deeply to impress him with a sense of the love of Christ, by know- ing from experience, something of what Christ endured for him ; and thus has a tendency to increase his love and sense of obligations to the Saviour; and will the better prepare him for the blessed employment, of celebrating the praises of redeeming love throughout ieternity. Be- sidt^ some christians, are by death enabled to glorify God before the world, perhaps more, than if (hey were exemp- ' ted from death, by manifesting the excellence of religion to support them under the heaviest afflictions, and strengthen them to meet even the king of terrors with fortitude and composure. 5. The christian, we have reason to believe, will final- ly enjoy the blessings of heaven more, than if he never had died. We know that in this world, when a person has been in great labour, distress, or pain, and finds rehef, rest, and comfort, his enjoyment is much more ex- quisite than if he had not been labouring or suffering. On the same principle, the enjoyments of heaven will be heightened by the previous sufierings of the believer, and DEATH. 13 therefore by the agonies of death. And the final triumph which all believers shall have over death and the grave, " when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality ;" And that say- ing is brought to pass, " death is swallowed up in victory." And they shall sing that song, " O death where is thy sting ? O grave, where is thy victory ? Thanks be to God which giveth us the victory, through our Lord Jesus Christ — " (1 Cor. xv. 54, 55, 57.) will be a source of inex- pressible happiness to them, which they could not have had, if they had never been called to combat with death. These are some of the reasons which may be offered in answer to the inquiry, why believers, though delivered from condemnation through Christ, nevertheless die. We proceed — II. To enquire what is the state of the soul immediately after death ? The soul does not die with the body, but sur- vives it, and exists in a separate state. The immortality of the soul has already been proved in a former discourse. The state of the souls of the righteous and the wicked after death is widely dififerent. "The souls of belivers are at their death made perfect in holiness, and do immediately pass in- to glory." But as stated in our Larger Catechism, " the souls of the wicked are at their death cast into hell, where they remain in torments and utter darkness." The depart- ed soul goes into no middle state, such as purgatory is de- scribed to be; neither docs the soul sleep at death, and continue in a state of inactivity, and insensibility until the resurrection of the body, as some have supposed; but it pas- ses immediately into a state of happiness or misery. The souls of the righteous, at the instant in which the separation from the body takes place by death, are perfected in holi- ness, and do immediately pass into glory, where they are active and enjoy the happiness of heaven, in a state of se- paration from the body. And on the other hand, the souls of the wicked, are immediately after death, cast into hell, where, in their separate state, they endure excruciating torment. The truth of this statement is confirmed by the testimo- ny of the Scriptures. We find no mention made in the Scriptures of such a place as purgatory. We are there- fore warranted from the silence of the Scriptures to con- clude there is no such place. Besides the Scriptures fre- \ 14 SEUMON LII. quently teach that the present life is the only season of pro- bation, and that death will unalterably fix the state of the man ; which is a further conclusive argument against the existence of such a place as purgatory. And to these we may add that the object of such a place, as set forth by its advocates ; which is, by suffering, to make atonement for sin, is contrary to the whole tenor of the word of God. That the soul does not sleep until the resurrection is equally evident from the Scriptures. That the souls of the wicked do no sleep, but are immediately cast into hell, appears evident from the parable of the rich man and La- zarus, recorded Luke xvi. " The rich man also died and was buried. And in hell he lifted up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried, and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue ; for I am tormen- ted in this flame." It is evident that this parable was inten- ded to represent the state of the wicked, not after the re- surrection, but immediately after death ; for the rich man being denied his first request, spake of having five breth- ren, still living on the earth ; and requested that Lazarus might be sent to warn them, lest they also should come to the place of torment in which he then was. Hence it is certain the parable was intended to represent the state of th-e soul of the rich man, immediately after death. And that the souls of the righteous do not sleep until the resurrection ; but pass immediately into the heavenly bles- sedness, the same parable teaches. " The beggar died and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom." — This doctrine is also proved by what our Saviour said to thepenitent thief on the cross, Luke xxiii. 43. "Verily I say unto thee, io-day shalt thou be with me in Paradise.'''' — The same is further proved by what the Apostle said of himself, and other christians. 2 Cor. v. 6. 8. "Whilst we are at home in the body we are absent from the Lord. We are willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord." Here presence with the Lord is inferred as an immediate consequence of absence from the body, which is elfected by death. Once more, this doc- trine is proved by what the Apostle says, Phil. i. 21, 23. " For me to hve is Christ, and to die is gain. For I am in a strait betwixt two, having a desire to depart, and to be DEATH. 15 with Christ which is far better." Here Paul asserted that it would be better for him to die than to live ; which would not have been true, if he had passed into a state of insensi- bility ; for Paul, while in this Avorld, enjoyed in communion with his Saviour, more happiness than misery. Besides in the passage quoted, he tells us the reason why he would be happier if he should depart, viz. that then he would be with Christ, which was far better than to live. From all these proofs, it is abundantly evident, that the soul immediately after death, passes into a state of happi- ness or misery, where it shall continue, enjoying the one, or sutFering the other, until its reunion to the body at the resurrection. It remains now that we answer the III. Inquiry proposed, which was, what is the state of the body after death.'* The body returns unto the dust, whence it was taken. It descends into the grave, a land of silence, and of darkness ; and there becomes the prey of worms and corruption, and moulders into dust. This state of the bo- dy after death is common to both the righteous and the wicked. But still there is a very great difference between the state of the bodies of the righteous, and of the wicked. The bodies of the righteous after death continue united to Christ. For the union which the believer has to Christ in this life is a union of the whole man body as well as soul, and this union is a permanent one which even death can- not dissolve ; for neither death nor life, shall be able to se- parate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. Besides the saints are said to sleep in Jesus. And not only do the bodies of the righteous continue united to Christ ; but also their grave is called a bed, and a place of peace and rest. My flesh (said the Psalmist, Ps. xvi. 9.) shall rest in hope." " If we believe, (said Paul, 1 Thes. iv. 14.) that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him." And Is. Lvii. 1, 2. we read, " The righteous shall enter m- io peace : they shall re^Hn their beds.'''' The death of the body is to the righteous a sleep, and the grave is a bed. Their dust is all precious in the sight of Christ, he watch- es over it and will raise it again in glory. Not so with the bodies of the wicked. The grave is to them a prison, in which they are locked up by Christ as an offended judge^ until the resurrection and judgment of the great day ; where they shall be raised in dishonour, and be brought forth as out of prison to execution. 16 SERMON Lir. A few reflections will now close this subject. How great an evil is sin ! It is the cause of all the mise- ries which we suffer, or see in this life. It is the cause of death ; and of all those dreadful and eternal miseries which the wicked suflfer after death. Shall we then continue to love sin ? Shall we roll this poison as a sweet morsel un- der our tongues ? Shall we cherish this viper in our bo- soms ? Shall we not rather hate sin, watch and war against it, and flee from it as from our most deadly foe ? Again, what reason have we to be humble ! " It is ap- pointed unto men once to die." We are included in the decree. Let us consider to what we are coming. Soon will these bodies become a lifeless lump of clay and be buried out of the sight of survivors. Soon will the rich and the poor, the high and the low, mingle together in one place, where a king cannot be distinguished from a peas- ant ; and where worms and corruption will make no dis- tinction, but will alike prey upon all. Come ye proud children of men, view this just picture which you are too apt to keep out of sight ; and let it humble your pride. In view of this subject, how foolish is that pride which is founded on beauty of form and complexion, or on wealth or descent, and which leads a person to look down with contempt, on others of perhaps far more noble and virtuous minds, and far more useful in the world, and therefore far more deserving of esteem ! Soon you must mingle with these persons and be brought to a level with them, where your bones and dust cannot be distinguised from theirs. Come and view this picture, and say with Job, " to cor- ruption, thou art my father ; to the worm, thou art my mo- ther and my sister," (Jobxvii. 14.) and abase your pride and be humble. And learn further from this picture of yourselves, the folly of being so anxious about the body, and spending so much precious time to pamper and adorn it, and fulfil its lusts, when it must so soon be corrupted and moulder into dust. And is this the end of man ! Is there no hope beyond the grave ! must death and the grave forever reign ! Alas ! how gloomy the thought ! how insupportable the prospect of death ! But blessed be God for the Gospel ; it dispels this gloom, brings life and immortality to light by Jesus Christ, and opens a world of bliss to the righteous. Though the body dies and moulders into dust ; yet the soul lives THE RESURRECTION. 17 and goes to God who gave it. Death is unspeakable gain to the believer. It puts an end to sin and sorrow. It in- troduces the soul made perfect in holiness, into the blessed- ness of heaven. And the body shall rest in hope. Christ will take care of it and will raise it up at the last day. — How blessed are the righteous ! But this same revealed word of God which opens such a glorious hope to them, renders the prospects of the wick- ed still more dreadful. Gloomy as is the grave, well would it be for the wicked, if this were the end of them. — But this is not the case ; for while the body moulders into dust, the soul must live in inexpressible misery. And the body must one day come forth of its prison, and the soul and body united be forever tormented together. Let the miserable end of the wicked, and the happy end of the righteous influence us all so to live, that we may die the death of the righteous, and our last end be like his.— Amen. SERMON LIU. THERESURRECTION. ACTS xxiv. 15. And have hope towards God, ivhich they themselves also allow^ that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust. The sentence pronounced by God upon the human race, when our first parents had sinned, was, " dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return". Gen. iii. 19. This sentence has ever since been executing ; and death has passed on every individual of the human family, down to the present generation, except Enoch and Elijah. All the numerous generations which have lived before us are in the dust. Our earth must therefore be one vast grave- yard. To the innumerable multitudes already under ground, must soon be added the millions of the present VOL. II. 3 18 SERMON LIII. generation, and finally in succession, all the unknown generations, which, down to the end of time, are yet to people our world. The irreversible decree of heaven is, " it is appointed unto men once to die." Heb. ix. 27. — And must the bodies of this innumerable multitude for- ever lie in ruins ? Must they become the prey of worms and corruption, and moulder into dust, without hope ? Must the dominion of death and the grave be eternal ? gloomy prospect ! Tolerable only to the wicked ! and to them rendered tolerable only by the conviction, that if there be a resurrection, it will be to their misery. But the word of God dispels this gloom. All the vast army of the dead shall rise again. Of this our text assures us. " There shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust." We have considered the subject of death. The doctrine of the resurrection follows next in order. To this doctrine is your attention solicited in the ensuing discourse. The resurrection is mentioned in the 37th and 38th ques- tions of our Catechism. By the resurrection of the dead, we understand the ri- sing again of the self-same body which was laid in the grave, to be animated with the self-same soul, with which it was united before death ; so that every individual after the resurrection will be the same person substantially, as be- fore death, though in form and appearance he may be great ly altered. The body, which shall be raised, will be formed out of the same particles of matter, which compo- sed it before death. — These, wherever scattered, and in whatever form they may be, shall be collected together by the power of God, and unite with each other, and as- sume the form of a human body ; and into that body shall the same soul which once dwelt in it, re-enter. That the same body which was laid in the grave, shall be raised at the last day, is necessarily implied in the ve- ry nature of a resurrection. If it were a different body, or a body composed of different particles of matter, from those which composed the body when it was laid in the grave, it would be a creation, and not a resurrection — Therefore, if there be a resurrection, the same bodies, substantially must rise, which were laid in the dust. The resurrection of the dead is a doctrine purely of re- velation ; And it is from the revealed word of God a- THE RESURRECTION. 19 lone that the question can be answered shall the dead rise again ? That they shall rise is taught both in the Old and the New Testament ; though much more fre- quently, and clearly in the latter than in the former. — That this doctrine was believed by the Jews or at least a part of them,and perhaps all, except the Sadducees, is ev- ident from our text. " And have hope towards God, which thei) themselves also allow, that there shall be a resur- rection of the dead, both of the just and unjust." These words are a part of Paul's defence before Felix the Roman Governor, in reply to the accusations of the Jews. They charged him with heresy ; but he declared his belief of all things written in the law and the prophets ; and es- pecially his behef of the doctrine of the resurrection which the Jews themselves allowed to be true. That the Jews except the Sadducees were acquainted with this doctrine and believed it, is further evident from Acts xxiii. 8. "For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrec- tion, neither angel, nor spirit ; but the Pharisees con- fess both." In the Old Testament we find a few passages which teach this doctrine, and by which the church in that age were led into the knowledge and belief of it. When God appeared unto Moses, in the burning bush at Horeb, " Exod. iii. 6. He said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob." These words are a proof of the doctrine of the resurrection. For our Saviour when answering the Sadducees, who denied the resurrec- tion, while they professed to believe the five books of Moses, referred to this passage as a proof of it, Luk. xx. 37, 38. " Now that the dead are raised, even Moses show ed at the bush, when he calleth the Lord the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. — For he is not a God of the dead, but of the living." This doctrine is again taught in the following passage Job xix» 25, 26, 27. " I know that my Redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth ; and though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God : Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another;" This doctrine is also proved from Dan. xii. 2. " And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to 20 SERMON LIU. everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting con- tempt." There are several other passages in the Old Testament from which this doctrine is argued, though they are not so express as those which have been quoted. In the New Testament this doctrine is very frequently and clearly taught. It is taught by the instances of dead persons being restored to life ; and by the resurrection of our Lord himself Besides a great many texts expressly affirm the doctrine. We shall quote some of the most prominent. Our text is very explicit. " 1 here shall be a resurrection of the dead, both ol the just and unjust." So also are the following passages — John v. 28, 29, " 1 he hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth ; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life ; and they that have done evil, unto theresurrection of damnation." John vi. 39, 40. " And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day. And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believethon him, may have everlasting life : And I will raise him up at the last day." Luke xiv. 14. " Thou shalt be recompensed at the resurrection of the just." Acts iv. 2. " They taught the people, and preached through Jesus the resurrection from the dead." Acts xvii. 18. He preached unto them Jesus, and the re- surrection." I Cor. \i. 14. " And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power." 1 Cor. chap. xv. is almost wholly on this subject. 1 Thes. iv 14, 16. " If we believe that Jesus died, and rose a- gain, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the Archangel, and with the trump of God : and the dead in Christ shall rise first." And Rev. xx. 12, 13. "I saw the dead small and great, stand before God : And the books were opened ; and another book was opened, which is the book of life ; and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, accor- ding to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it ; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them." These are some of the ma- ny texts which we find in the New Testament, on the THE RESURRECTION. 21 subject of the resurrection of the dead ; and they abun- dantly prove the doctrine. Several objections have been brought by cavillers and unbelievers against this doctrine ; but they seem to be founded on an ignorance, or on wrong notions, of the knowledge and power of God. It is certain that a God of infinite knowledge perfectly knows every particle of dust, which composed the bodies of his human creatures. And it is equally certain that he can separate from all other dust, that of each individual, wherever it may be placed, and whatever changes it may have passed through ; and bring it together again in a human form. He who could create all things at first out of nothing, can certainly form man again out of the dust, of which he was at first composed. Since therefore God can raise the dead, the only question is, will he do it } This question he himself has answered, and has assured us that he will. The resurrection will be universal, extending to all the dead, of every nation and of every age. Of this Christ has assured us John v. 28. " The hour is cominij, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth." Not one of the countless millions of the dead, old or young, shall be forgotten or overlooked in that day. With respect to those who shall then be found alive ; (for in that dpy there will be a generation living upon hrist taught "Notevery one thatsaith unto 'me,Lord,Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but hethat doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Mat. vii. 21. •' Why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which 1 say?" Luke vi. 4 6. " If ye love me keep my com- mandments." John xiv. 15. " Ye are my friends, if ye do w^hatsoever I command you." John xv. 14. and, " Blessed arc they that do his commandments, that they may have voi:,. n. 9 OO SERMON LVin. right to the tree of life." Rev. xxii. 14. Hence it is evi- dent that obedience to the will of God is our duty. This obedience which we owe to the will of God, should be personal, sincere, perfect, and perpetual. It should bejacwowa/; thatis we are bound to render obedience ourselves. We cannot be released from our obligations by the obedience of others. The language of the Scriptures is " thou shalt love the Lord thy God, &c. thou shalt love thy neighbour." Mat. xxii. 37. 39. '• The man that doth them shall live in them." It ought to be sincere, or with our hearts, as well as our bodies. Exter- nal obedience, unless it be sincere or from the heart will not be acceptable. God requires the heart. The lan- guage of his word is, " My son give me thine heart." Prov. xxiii. 26. " Thou shalt love the Lord, thy God, with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind." Mat. xxii. 37. This obedience ought also to be perfect, or to the full extent of all the powers of the whole man, both soul and body, without swerving in any instance. Or coming short in the least degree. For God is worthy the highest obe- dience of which he has made us capable, according to the natural powers which he has given us. And he re- quires, " Thou shalt love the Lord thy God, with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind." Luke x. 27. Again this obedience ought to be /)erpe/w«/. It is our duty to render a person- al, sincere, and perfect obedience to the will of God, not merely for a limited time, but unremittingly, and contin- ually ; for the foundations of our obligations to obedience continue the same, and therefore our duty will continue the same. II. We observe that the will of God to be the rule of our conduct must be revealed. " The duty which God re- quireth of man is obedience to his revealed wilV And " ye shall walk in all the ways, which the Lord your God hath commanded you?'' If his will were not revealed or made known, his creatures could not be under obligations to render obedience to it. For, " secret things belong unto the Lord our God ; but those things which are revealed, belong unto us." Deut. xxix. 29. The will of God which he has not made known, or with which we have not the means of becoming acquainted, we are not bound te obey. OBEDIENCE. 6? But when God has revealed his will, and has^given us the means of becoming acquainted with it, we are under obli- gations to obedience, whether we actually know his will or not. For it is our duty to know the will of God, when he has revealed it, and afforded the means of knowing it. And in these circumstances it is highly criminal to be ignorant of the divine will. God has made known his will to men, to be the rule of their duty. He has in a degree made it known to all men. For he has in some measure written his law on the con- sciences of men, as we learn from Rom. ii. 14, 15. "When the Gentiles,which have not the iaw,do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves : which show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another." The works of God also in some measure declare to all men his will and their duty. As we learn from Ps. xix. 1 — 4. " The heavens declare the glory of God ; and the firmament showeth his handy work. Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge. There is no speech nor language where their voice is not heard. Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world." — And from Rom. i. 20. " The invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being under- stood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead ; so that they are without excuse." Much of our duty is taught by the light of nature, or the works of God, and the dictates of conscience ; and enough to leave those who have no other guide, without excuse for their disobedience. But this light has become greatly obscur- ed by the fall ; and though it is owing to the depravity of man that so little is learned from this source, God has in infinite mercy condescended to make a far more clear re- velation of his will, to be the rule of man's duty. This clear revelation we have in the Holy Scriptures. The will of God thus made known is his law, by which they, who have the means of becoming acquainted with the Scriptures, are to be governed. We proceed now. III. To shew the nature, obligation, and use of the di- vine law. 68 SERMON LVIII. I. The nature. The law qf God contained in the Scriptures, has been generally considered as threefold, viz. ceremonial, judi- cial, and moral. The cercmo7/m/ law includes those relig- ious rites which God prescribed to the church of old, as shadows or types of good things to come. These laws were obligatory on the church, from the time that they were given, until Christ the substance came, and then they ceased to be any longer binding. The judicial law includes those precepts which God en- joined upon the Israelites as a nation. Of these some were founded in the nature and fitness of things, and are therefore obligatory on all nations : and have been intro- duced into the code of all well regulated governments, down to the present time. Others arose out of the local circumstances of the Jewish nation, and were binding on- ly upon them. The moral law is that with which we are more intimate- ly concerned. This branch of the divine laws, is some- times subdivided into moral natural., and m.0T^\ positive. By the first kind of moral precepts, we understand those which are founded in the very nature and fitness of things, and which would have been binding on men, had God ne- ver expressly enjoined them. Thus it would have been our duty, to have loved God, and to have loved our neighbour, though God had never expressly commanded us so to do. This division of the moral law is the same with what is called the law of nature. It is the law of nature committed to writino-. By V[iOYQ\ positive precepts we understand those which could not have been discovered by the light of nature ; but which become duty solely because God has comman- ded them. Of this nature are the laws respecting bap- tism and the Lords Supper. The obligations to observe them arises from a positive command of God. It would be our duty to pray unto God, though he had never com- manded it ; but it would not be our duty, to observe the ordinances of baptism and the Lord's Supper, if God had not enjoined it. Of the same nature is a part of the fourth commandment. That part of it which requires a portion of our time to be particularly devoted to the worship of God is moral natural, and would have been binding with- out an express command. But that part which requires ' OBEDIENCE. 69 tiiat we should devote the seventh rather than the sixth, or any other portion of our time; and that part which di- rects the seventh day of the week, rather than any other to be observed, are moral positive, and for any thing we can discover, become duty because God has so pleased to command. Those precepts which we call moral natural are per- petually and unchangeably binding ; for being founded in the nature and fitness of things, while these contin- ue, the laws founded on them must continue in force. — But positive precepts may be changed, though they con- tinue in force until revoked or altered by the sovereign Lawgiver. " The moral law is summarily comprehended in the ten commandments." " The sum of the ten command- ments is, to love the Lord our God with all our heart, with all our soul, with all our strength, and with all our mind, and our neighbour as ourselves." The whole of the law is summed up in the single word, " Love.'''' As saith the A- postle, Rom. xiii. 10. " Love is the fulfilling of the law." The law requires us to love God supremely and perfect- ly, or to the utmost extent of all the powers of the whole man, soul and body. It requires us thus to love God him- self, for what he is, in himself The excellence of the di- vine character is the primary and the highest foundation of all true love to God. The law also requires us to love ourselves ; for it re- quires us to love our neighbour as ourselves which clear- ly implies that self love is a duty. This love of ourselves is to be subordinate to the love which we owe to God. — Our love is not to be divided between God and our- selves. But we are to love ourselves with a subordi- nate love ; and that same love with which we love our- selves is to go beyond ourselves to God as its ultimate ob ject. There are duties which we owe ourselves, such as the preservation of our own lives, character, health, and estate ; endeavours to be comfortable in the world ; to obtain heaven hereafter ; and the like. In the perfor- mance of these duties we may have the glory of God in view, and our own happiness in subordination to his glo- ry. And indeed we cannot love God, and obey him without performing these duties which we owe to our- selves. 70 SERMON LVIII. The law further requires us to love our neighbour as ourselves. This is also to be in subordination to the love which we owe to God. By loving our neighbour as our- selves, we are to understand the same, as that rule of equi- ty laid down by our Saviour Mat. vii. 12. •' All things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye e- ven so to them." The law of loving our neighbour as our- selves, requires us to respect our neighbour's rights. And in every situation in which we have any thing to do with our neighbour, to act towards him, just as in a change of circumstances, we would expect him to act towards us. 2. To consider the extent of our obligation to keep the divine law. The ceremonial law as we have observed was done away by the coming of Christ, and the judicial laws given to the Jews, were intended to be obligatory only on that nation, except those which were of a moral nature. The question then, here to be considered is, Is the moral law binding under the christian dispensation, and is it our duty to render a perfect obedience to it } This question I would answer in the affirmative. We are as much in duty bound to render perfect obedience to the moral law as ever Adam was. For the foundations of duty continue the same, and therefore duty itself must continue equally binding. What is the sum of the moral law ? " Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy Jieart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind ; and thy neighbour as thyself." Our duty to God here stated is founded on his excellence, or his being what he is, which renders him worthy of the highest and most perfect love ; and the obligation is in- creased by the relations which he sustains to us of Crea- tor, Preserver, and Benefactor. And our duty to others here enjoined, is founded on others being what they are, and standing related to us as they do. While therefore God continues to be what he is, which he will eternally do, it will be our duty to love him perfectly ; and while we have neighbours, there will be the same reason that ever existed, that we should love them as ourselves. The moral law must therefore be still binding ; and we are un- der as great obligations as ever Adam was to render per- fect obedience thereunto. That we have fallen and are depraved creatures, and indisposed to keep the law, is no reason why we should not keep it. God is as worthy of OBEDIENCE. 71 the perfect love of his creatures as he ever was ; and neighbours stand in the same relation to each other that they ever did. Yea I may say that we are perhaps un- der greater obligations to render perfect obedience to the divine law than Adam was. For in addition to all the reasons why he should be obedient, there is this reason to enforce our obedience which he had not in his state of innocency — the amazing love of God manifested in re- demption. The truth of this position that we are under obligations to render perfect obedience to the divine law, is further confirmed by what we find in the Scriptures on this sub- ject. The reason given why the Saviour was called Jesus, was, " he shall save his people from their sins." Mat. i. 21. In his instructions he ever inculcated practical holiness, and he declared to his hearers, " Think not that I am come to destroy the law. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil." Mat. V. 17. And he particularly enjoined up- on his hearers, " All things, whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them." Mat. vii. 12. " And be ye perfect even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect," Mat. v. 48. And in the Epistles we read. " Do we then make void the law through faith.'* God forbid: yea, we estabhsh the law." Rom. iii. 31. " Let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God — 2 Cor. vii. 1. "Now the God of peace — make you perfect in every good work to do his will." Heb. xiii. 20, 21. " As he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation, because it is written, be ye holy ; for I am holy," 1 Pet. i. 15, 16. Further, suppose that Christ by his death, did away the obligation of men to render perfect obedience to the divine law, is to suppose that he died to purchase for men an exemption from that which is right, and makes him the minister of sin — a sen- timent which the Scriptures reject with abhorrence. " Is Christ the minister of sin.'* God forbid." Gal. ii. 17. From all these considerations we conclude, that the moral law is still in full force, and as much obligatory up- on mankind as it ever was ; and that sin or a transgress- ion of the law is as hateful to God as it ever was. It is true that none of the fallen race of man can be saved by their obedience to tlie moral law ; for it has 72 SERMON LVIII. ceased to be a covenant of life or a covenant by which life can be obtained; but it still remains a rule of duty. And it is also true that none of mankind do perfectly fulfil the law ; but this does not destroy the obligation to obedience. With respect to the un- regenerate who are out of Christ, they are under the law as a covenant, and if they should die in this state must bear its heavy penalty for failing perfectly to fulfil it and for transgressing its precepts. And with respect to the regenerate who are united to Christ, though it is their duty to render perfect obedience to the will of God, and though they come short, yet God accepts their sin- cere obedience, and pardons their failings. — Not because he has released them from obligations to perfect obedi- ence ; but for the sake of the atonement and perfect righteousness of Christ, to whom they are united. So that although believers cannot be saved by the works of the law ; yet the law is still binding upon them as a rule of life. And they are under obligations to render perfect obedience thereunto ; and to love the Lord their God, with all their heart, and soul, and strength, and mind, and their neighour as themselves ; and they deserve the wrath of God for failing to do this. And they who have right apprehensions of the character of God, will feel that it is their duty, thus to love and serve him ; and that they are blameable and deserve God's wrath and curse for com- ing short. 3, And here the question may be asked, since life can- not now be obtained by the law, and since fallen man is morally unable perfectly to fulfil it, of what use is it under the Gospel ? I answer it is of great use. It teaches all men the holy nature and will of God, and what is the duty they owe to him. It teaches them the sinfulness of their nature, hearts, and lives. It is calculated to humble them, and to shew them their inability, and the insufficien- cy of any thing they can do to merit salvation, and the need they have of a Saviour. It is of great use to awaken the consciences of the unregenerate, and to convince them of their sin, guilt, and danger ; " for by the law is the knowledge of sin." Rom. iii. 20., . It is of great use to drive them off, when awakened, from every false ground of hope, and especially from a self righteous foundation, and to drive them to Christ to take refuge in his perfect OBEDIENCE. 73 righteousness, from the wrath with which the law threat- ens them ; or if they continue in sin and rebellion to leave them inexcusable. It is also of great use to the real peo- ple of God. Its dreadful curse from which they are de- livered by Christ to whom they are united by faith, teach- es them, how much they are bound to love him; and thus is calculated to lead them to thankfulness, and to be care- ful to conform themselves to the law as a rule of life, which is well pleasing to Christ. The law further in- structs them into the holy nature and will of God, and teaches them what they ought to be, and how far they come short ; and thus is calculated to humble them. And it is a rule for them, by which to regulate their conduct, and according to which every true child of God, must and will endeavour to walk. He will love the law of God, and desire to be perfectly conformed thereunto, he will grieve that he comes short ; and he will rest entirely sat- isfied with nothing short of perfect obedience. Since then the moral law is still binding, and is of such great use in the system of religion, we shall proceed iix future discourses to treat thereof, as it is summarily con- tained in the ten commandments. These commandments were delivered by God himself from Mount Sinai, and written by him on two tables of stone. The first table in- cluding the first four of these commandments, contains our duty to God ; the second table, comprising the last six commandments contains our duty to man. The moral law as contained in these commandments though expressed in few words is exceeding broad. These commandments are an epitome of the moral pre- cepts revealed throughout the Scriptures. And perhaps we may say, there is no moral precept, enjoined in the Scriptures, but what is either expressly or implicitly con- tained in the ten commandments. In improving this subject, let it be deeply impressed on our minds that we are under indispensable obligations to render obedience to the revealed will of God. Let us therefore carefully endeavour to become acquainted with his will. — Let us remember that the moral law is still bind- ing upon us, and that we are under obligations perfectly to obey it. Let a conviction of this drive the sinner to Christ, under a sense of his transgressions, and his ex- posure to the curse of the law ; and let it lead the chris- VOL. II. 10 74 SERMON LIX. tian to be careful to maintain good works, and to seek to be perfect as his Father in heaven is perfect. — Amen. SERMON LIX. PREEIACE TO THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. EXODUS XX. 2. " / a7n the Lord thy God which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.'''' In this chapter we have the ten commandments, con- taining a summary of the moral law. These command- ments were delivered to the nation of Israel from Mount Sinai, immediately by the voice of God himself The circumstances attending their delivery were such as show- ed their great importance, and were peculiarly calculat- ed to impress mankind with awe, and lead them to obe- dience. The people were apprised that the Lord was about to come down upon Mount Sinai ; and were com- manded to sanctify themselves for two days before, and to wash their clothes. — Bounds were set round about the mountain; and both man and beast were forbidden to touch it under pain of death. And when the Lord came down upon the mount, " there were thunders, and light- nings, and a thick cloud upon the mount, and the voice of the trumpet exceeding loud ; so that all the people that was in the camp trembled — and Mount Sinai, was alto- gether on a smoke, because the Lord descended upon it in fire, and the smoke thereof ascended as the smoke of a furnace, and the whole mount quaked greatly." Ex. xix. 16, 18. With such solemn circumstances accompanying, and with such terrible majesty, were the ten command- ments given, by the voice of God himself The whole transaction was calculated to awe the Israehtes into obe- dience ; and not only the Israelites, but us also, and all who in after ages should be made acquainted with these PREFACE TO THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. 75 commandments, and the manner in which they were given. Our text is the preface or introduction to the ten com- mandments, and contains reasons to enforce our obedience lo them. We shall in the ensuing discourse endeavour to illus- trate the import of this ineface. This subject is contained in our Catechism in the ans- wers to the 43d and 44th questions — " What is the preface to the ten commandments? " The preface to the ten commandments is in these words, I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. What doth the preface to the ten commandments teach us ? The preface to the ten commandments teacheth us, that be- cause God is the Lord, and our God and Redeemer, therefore we are bound to keep all his commandments.'''' Our text contains thi-ee reasons why we should keep the moral law, as summarily comprehended in the ten commandments ; viz. I. Because God is the Lord — "I am the Lord." II. Because he is our God — " thy God." III. Because he is our Redeemer-" Which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage." I. The first reason why we should keep God's com- mandments is, he is the Lord — " I am the Lord" — or Je- hovah. God here asserts his sovereignty, or his absolute right to reign, and give laws to his creatures, and there- fore their duty to obey his laws, from the consideration of what he is. Jehovah is the incommunicable name of God, signifying essential existence. It expresses his being. — • God here gives his essential being as a reason of his right of authority over his creatures, and of their obligations of obedience to his commandments. The perfections of God are the same with his being. His essential perfect- ions are therefore here brought into view, as constituting a foundation of man's obligation to render obedience to his commandments. God is self existent. He is Jehovah — the I AM — the self existent being, having his being in and of himself, and giving being to all things else. He is the first cause of all things ; for nothing else is self existent ; all things 76 SERMON LIX. else are derived from him, and dependent on him, and therefore are his. He gave them being according to his will, and he made them for himself; and therefore he has an indisputable right to govern his creatures according to his will, and all who are capable of knowing his will, are under indispensable obligations to render ohedience. Again, as Lord or Jehovah, he is infinitely wise ; for as he is the first cause of all things, every perfection which we see in creatures, must in an infinite degree belong to him. Therefore his laws, which must be an expression of his will, as he is independent of every creature, and can be under no bias from others to influence his will, must also be, like himself, infinitely wise. Infinite goodness is also included in the name Jehovah. This is an essential perfection of God — '• God is love," 1 John iv. 8. " Abundant in goodness and truth," Ex. xxxiv. 6. This perfection will invariably lead him to frame such laws as will best conduce to the happiness of his creatures, and in promoting the general good, and in keeping of which individual happiness will be best se- cured. Strict justice is also another essential attribute of God. *' All his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he," Deut. xxxii. 4. "Justice and judgment are the habitation of thy throne," Ps. lxxxix. 1 4. Hence it follows that God can will nothing but what is right, and tlierefore that he will always govern accord- ing to strict right, and have respect in his laws to all the rights of all his creatures. Creatures therefore, who de- sire to do right, and to have that which is right done to them, are always safe in the hands of such a Law-giver. Again, omnipresence and omniscience are perfections essential to the divine being. He is present to all his creatures ; " for in him we live and move and have our being," Acts xvii. 28. And he perfectly knoweth all his creatures. " Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight ; but all things are naked, and open- ed unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do," Heb. iv. ] 3. " The J^ord searcheth all hearts, and understand- cth all the imaginations of the thoughts," 1 Chron. xxviii. 9. " The righteous God trieth the hearts and reins," Ps. vii. 9. He therefore cannot be deceived, and perfectly knows how to distribute justice to every one. PREFACE TO THE TEN COiyiMANDMENTS. 77 , Again, as Jehovah he is all-sufficient. He " is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think," Eph. iii. 20. He is abundantly able to supply all the neces- sities of all his creatures. He has an infinite fulness from which to relieve them amidst all their distresses, and to reward them for their obedience. Further, as Jehovah he is omnipotent. He is the Al- mighty God. He has all power to enforce his all-wise, benevolent and righteous laws ; to protect and reward the obedient, and punish the disobedient ; and thus to se- cure the good of his creatures at large, and the individu- al happiness of his obedient subjects. Such a being is God. He is self-existent having his being in and of himself, giving being to all other creatures, and supporting them in existence, and therefore having an absolute right to give them laws and require their obedience ; and he also possesses such perfections as ev- ery way qualify him to govern, and to secure the general good, and the rights of individuals, and their happiness too if they be obedient. He has infinite wisdom to know how to frame the best laws ; infinite benevolence to lead him to give the best laws ; infinite justice to influence him to give laws, which will secure the rights of all his sub- jects; omnipresence and omniscience, to be always at hand, and always knowing, to all the wants, and all the motives of action, and all the deserts of all his creatures ; all-sufficiency to support all their necessities, and reward their obedience ; and almighty power to enforce his laws, fulfil his promises to the obedient, and execute his threat- nings upon the disobedient. Such a being is certainly every way fitted to reign, and has an absolute right to govei'n. This argument therefore in the preface to the ten commandments runs thus ; " I am the Lord," or Jeho- vah— the self-existent being, the supreme first cause of all things, an all wise, infinitely good and just, an every where present, omniscient, all-sufficient, and almighty be- ing, therefore thou shalt obey my laws — " thou shalt have no other gods before me, &;c." This character of God makes his will a law, whether we can discover any thing in the reason and fitness ol things to oblige us to obedience or not. In many of the laws which he has given us, we can discover a suitable- ness or fitness in them, obligatin§c us to obedience, and 78 SERMON LIX. this is the case ivith the chief of the precepts of the ten commandments, but where this is not the case, consider- ing the character of God, a "thus saith the Lord," is a sufficient reason why we should render obedience. He has an absohite right to command what he pleases ; for he can command nothing but what is right ; and when his will is made known, we are under indispensable obliga- tions to render implicit obedience. So that positive pre- cepts, until revoked by the Law-giver are equally bind- ing ^Wth natural precepts, except where they clash with each other, and then we are to obey natural precepts rather than positive. We proceed to the II. Reason mentioned in our text to enforce obedience to the ten commandments, viz. that the Lord is our God, " I am the Lord, th?/ God.'''' This reason is drawn from the covenant of grace ; and is an additional reason to the one which we have just considered — " I am the Lord,'' why men, to whom God is revealed in this character, should obey his commandments. They ought to obey his commandments, not only because he is the Lord, or is what he is; but also because he offers himself in the covenant of grace, to be the reconciled God of all who will truly be- lieve in his Son ; and because he really sustains this re- lation to all his people. That the covenant of grace is here intended and brought into view, we learn from the general meaning of the phrase, " thy God" throughout the Scriptures ; for this phrase uniformly refers to the cove- nant of grace. When man fell and brake the covenant of works, God ceased to be his God. He became his enemy and angry with him every day ; and is still angry with him, unreconciled to him, and allows him no part nor lot in his favour, when he beholds him as under the first cov- enant. But in the covenant of grace through Christ, God oflfers himself as a reconciled God and portion, and becomes such to all who truly believe in his Son. It was in refer- ence to this covenant that God addressed the Israelites, at Sinai, who were in visible covenant with him, and called himself their God. And a particular reference was evi- dently here made to the covenant made with their an- cestor Abraham, which clearly was the covenant of grace. In this covenant God had promised to be the God of Abra- PREFACE TO THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. 79 ham and of his seed, and he here reminded the Israelites of this promise. And here I would remark that the title which God here gives himself, '• thy God," teaches us that the mor- al law which follow s, was given, not as a covenant of works, but as pertaining to the covenant of grace, or with reference to it. For, that the Lord was their God, which he could be to sinners only in the covenant of grace, was given as a reason, why they should keep the moral law. It was given to show the hohness of God, and the extent, evil, and desert of sin ; to convince the sinner of his utter inability to save himself, to show him his need of a Saviour, and to be a schoolmaster to drive him to Christ ; and at the same time to be t6 the true believer, really in the covenant of grace, a rule of duty according to which he should regulate his conduct. The covenant of grace affords to all to whom it is re- vealed a strong reason to enforce their obedience to the holy law of God. In this covenant God has manifested his infinite condescension and love. God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever beheveth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life" John iii. 16. The Son enoag-ed to do the will of the Fatiier. He became a surety for all who should believe in him before the days of his llesh ; and it was in virtue of his suretiship, which could not fail, that God became the covenant God of the Old Testament saints, before atone- ment was actually made for sin. In the fulness of time, the Son of God assumed human nature, took upon him the form of a servant, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. He bare the curse of the divine law due to sin, and thus satisfied divine justice, and pro- cured reconciliation with God for all, who will believe in his name. In and through Christ, God offers himself to be the sinner's God, which includes every blessing of the cov- enant of grace — grace here and glory hereafter. Most assuredly this consideration, ought to be a powerful mo- tive to lead us to obedience to tlie will of God. We are under indispensable obligations to render obe- dience to the will of God from the consideration of his es- sential character. And his character as a covenant God, or a God in Christ reconciling sinners to himself, undoubt- edly strengthens these obligations. And if the covenant 80 SERMON LIX. of grace afforded such a strong argument, to enforce obe- dience to the laws of God upon the Israelites ; it undoubt- edly affords a much stronger argument to enforce obedi- ence upon us, who live under the new dispensation of this covenant. For the nature of this covenant is now much more clearly revealed than it was formerly. The love of Christ, in his humiliation, obedience, sufferings, and death has been manifested to the world. And the grace of God and the blessings of the covenant of grace are now much more clearly made known than they were under the Old Testament dispensation. We therefore, who live under the light of the Gospel, are under increased obligations to render obedience to the law of God. And Christ, by his coming, instead of relaxing these obligations, as some pre- tend, has really increased them ; And instead of having rendered sin a less evil, and less odious in the sight of God, and thus becoming the minister of sin, he has made it the more exceedingly sinful. And those who under gospel light, continue to live in sin or disobedience to God's law, will be punished more severely, than if they had perished without hearing of the covenant of grace, or if they had enjoyed a revelation of it in a more obscure degree. The HI. Reason mentioned in our text to enforce obedience lo the moral law, is contained in these words, " which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage." This reason taken literally was appli- cable only to the Israelites but nevertheless it instructs us that all the blessings which God bestows upon us, bring us under obligations to render obedience to him. Surely therefore we, in this favoured land where we enjoy so ma- ny blessings are under peculiar obligations, to render o- bedience to the commandments of God ; and must be pe- culiarly guilty, and deserving of punishment if we trans- gress. But this argument, " which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage," we have rea- son to believe was to be understood figuratively and spir- itually as well as literally ; and in this sense it applies to all who stand related to God in the covenant of grace. — That dispensation, under which the Israelites were, a- bounded with types ; and almost all God's dealings to- wards them were intended to instruct them in spiritual PREFACE TO THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. 81 things. The providential dispensation brought into view in this argument vt^as evidently typical. The bondage of the Israelites in Egypt, aptly represented the sad state of man, while under the bondage of sin and Satan ; and the deliverance of the Israelites from Egyptian bondage was typical of a spiritual deliverance from the thraldom of sin by Jesus Christ. And to this typical or spiritual, as well as the literal meaning, we are to suppose the Lord had reference in this reason. This explanation is confirmed by the consideration that the moral law was intended to be binding in all ages of the church, and therefore this reason to enforce its observance, ought to be so explained as to be applicable to other nationsbes ides the Jews. Con- sidered in this light, we are urged to obedience to the di- vine law, because God is our Redeemer. This reason lays under obligation to obedience to the divine law, all who hear of the way of deliverance from the bondage of sin, and to whom deliverance is offered. But especially does this argument apply to all the real people of God, who are actually delivered from the dominion of sin, and are brought into the glorious liberty of the children of God. Let all consider the desert of sin, and the dreadful punishment to which it exposes them. From this punish- ment God offers salvation. How good and gracious must God be, who is thus willing to save guilty sinners, and who thus offers them salvation ! He therefore certainly deserves that his will should be obeyed by us. Let chris- tians especially, reflect on the awful danger from which they have been actually delivered ; the amazing price which was paid to open a way for their redemption ; and the greatness of that salvation of which they are made heirs, and they must be convinced that their obligations to render obedience to the divine will are peculiarly great. From this subject we infer that we are under as great, and greater obligations now, to render obedience to the moral law than the Israelites were of old. Let us there- fore feel our obligations, study to know and understand the law of God, and carefully endeavour in sincerity of heart to be obedient ; let us mourn and repent when we come short or transgress ; and let a sense of our failings and transgressions teach us the necessity of relying on grace for VOL. II, 11 82 SERMON LIX. salvation, endear Christ to us, and lead us continually to put our trust for pardon and acceptance in his righteous- ness. We infer again from our subject that obedience to God's commands is our reasonable service. If God be what he is, the self-existent, and supreme first cause of all things, an all-wise, infinitely good and just, ;omnipre- sent, omniscient, all-sufficient, and almighty being, he must unquestionably have an absolute right to reign, and his laws must all be just and good ; and obedience to his will must be our reasonable service. And if he has so loved our world as to give his Son to suffer and die to open a way of salvation for our wretched race ; if he has been so infinitely merciful as in and through him to make a covenant of grace, in which he offers to become our God, and to deliver us from the punishment and the bon- dage of sin, and to make us heirs of a glorious, blessed, and eternal inheritance ; and doth actually thus deliver and make heirs many of our race, — he certainly must be worthy our obedience. All that he has spoken to us, we ought to do. And sin which is a transgression of the law must be an exceedingly great evil ; and the sinner must justly deserve God's wrath and curse. Let us all be im- pressed with a sense of the reasonableness of obedience to the commandments of God, and the unreasonableness of sin ; let sinners out of Christ, realize their guilt and dan- ger ; and flee without delay, to him for safety ; and let all who name the name of Christ be careful to depart from all iniquity, and to keep the commandments of God. — Amen. SERMON LX. PUTIES REq,UlRED IN THE FIRST COMMANDMENT. EXODUS XX. 3. " Thou shall have no other gods be/ore mc." The moral law, summarily comprehended in the ten commandments, is unchangeable and perpetually bind- ing. It is therefore binding on us. And although we cannot now obtain life by the law ; still we are under obligations to render obedience to it. And every christian, while he builds his hope on the Lord Jesus Christ and trusts entirely to his merits for pardon and ac- ceptance with God, will at the same time love, and en- deavour to keep the commandments of God, and will grieve and repent when he comes short or transgresses. — - This is essential to the character of the true christian. — It is therefore highly important that we understand God's law. Our text is the first of the ten commandments. This commandment, though expressed in a few words, is ex- ceeding broad ; and taken in its utmost import, embraces the whole sum of religion. It is expressed negatively — - '• Thou shalt have no other gods before me. This not only forbids the sin which is expressly mentioned ; but it implies the contrary duty. And this is a rule which ap- plies to all the commandments ; where a sin is forbidden the contrary duty is commanded, and where a duty is commanded the contrary sin is forbidden. The duties required in this commandment arc stated in our Catechism in the answer to the 46th question. " What is required in the first commandment. The first commandment requireth us to k7iow and acknowledge God to be the only true God, and our God, and to ivorship and glorify him accordingly.'''' The object of the ensuing discourse is to illustrate the 84 SERMON LX. duties required in the first commandinent as stated in this answer. These duties are three. I. To know God. II. To acknowledge him. III. To worship and glorify him accordingly. I. This commandment requires us to know God ; first that he is, and then what he is. This knowledge lies at the foundation of all true religion. Without knowing and believing that there is a God, there can be no kind of religion. An Atheist, if there be such a being, can have no religion ; for he denies the very first principle, on which all religion, whether true or false, is founded. That there is a God, all nature, constantly and loudly, proclaims ; and to be convinced of this truth, we need only open our eyes upon the things we may see around us, and listen to the voice of reason. And it is our duty to know this truth that there is a God, not merely because we were educa- ted in the belief of it, or because others believe it; but from an attention to the evidence by which it is sup- ported. And it is our duty not only to know that God is, but also what he is. This knowledge also is essential to true religion; for all true religion takes its rise from the character of God ; and ignorance and error on this point, are the great causes of the false religion, and the irreligion which so much prevail in our world. It is therefore highly important to us and our indispensable duty to knoAv what God is. Further God has revealed himself to be known by us, and therefore it must be our duty to know him. And besides he has frequently in his word taught the duty; as in the following texts among a great many others. " Acquaint now thyself with him." Job xxii. 21. "Know thou the God of thy father." 1 . Chron. xxviii. 9. " Let him that glorieth, glory in this, that he understandeth and knoweth me, that I am tJie Lord which exercise loving-kindness, judgment and righteousness in the earth." Jer. ix. 24. " This is life eternal, that they might know thee, the only true God." John xvii. 3. All these and many other texts teach us that it is our duty to have a right knowledge of God. — And there are some passages, in which the want of this knowledge is reprehended as highly disgraceful and crim- inal Such are the following. '• My people are foolish, DUTIES REQUIRED IN THE FIRST COMMANDMENT, 85 they have not known me; the j are sottish children, and they have none understanding." Jer. iv. 22. " The Lord hath a controversy with the inhabitants of the land, be- cause there is no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God in the land." Hos. iv. 2. "They (that is the wicked) say unto God, depart from us : for we desire not the knowl- edge of thy ways." Jobxxi. 14. " My people are destroy- ed for lack of knowledge." Hos. 4. 6. " Even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind." Rom. i. 28. " Some have not the knowledge of God. I speak this to your shame." — 1 . Cor. XV. 34. Hence we conclude that it is our indispen- sable duty to know the character of God, as far as he has revealed himself, and we have ability and opportunity to know it ; and that those who are destitute oi a knowledge of God are highly criminal. It is true God is incompre- hensible, and in comparison of what he really is, it is but little that we can know of him ; but it becomes us to know w^hat we can. There are two ways in which God makes himself known unto men ; viz. by his works, and by his word. And we are in duty bound by the first commandment to have such a knowledge of God as may be obtained from the means of information which we enjoy. From the works of God maybe learned his power, wisdom and good- ness, and hencf* may be deduced the duties of fear, trust, gratitude, and love. In his word we have a far more clear and extensive exhibition of the divine character; and it is our duty, who have his w^ord, to know him, not only as he has revealed hiinself in his works, but also in his word. A just knowledge of God is highly important. For our duties to him are founded on his character; we are in his hands, on him we are constantly dependent, to him we are accountable, and he will fix our eternal state ; and he has offered himself to be known, and has made it our du- ty to know him. It becomes us therefore to know that he is the one only living and true God ; that he is a spirit, self-existent, the supreme first cause and last end of all things, all-sulficicnt, eternal, unchangeable, incomprehensible, every where present, omniscient, all-wise, almighty, infinitely holy, j^^^U good, true, mrrciful, and gracious ; that he subsists in tlii-ee persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost; and 86 ' SERMON LX. that he is a covenant God in Christ, in and through whom he is reconcihng sinners to himself. In short, it becomes us to know whatever God has been pleased to reveal of himself — his nature, perfections, works, and ways. And however some may despise knowledge, and judge it to be of little importance what a man knows on the subject of rehgion ; yet, knowledge is certainly of great importance; and ignorance, especially in our circumstances, where we have so abundantly the means of knowledge, is a great sin. And it is lamentable, that there are so many among us, so ignorant as they are, of the character of God, and the great truths of religion, which grow out of this char- acter ; and that they are bringing up their children in the same ignorance. This ignorance is a fruitful source of carelessness and sin. And even among those whose hearts we hope have been changed by the grace of God, we find some who have but little knowledge of God, in comparison of what they might have. And this is one reason of the frequent darkness of many, and the uncom- fortable seasons through which they pass, and the slow progress they make in the divine life. II. It is our duty not only to know ; but also to acknow- ledge God, even the God of the Scriptures, to be the only true God, and our God. We should acknowledge him with our hearts, by placing them upon him, and giving them to him. We should acknowledge him with our lips by confessing him before men, and professing our at- tachment to him. And we should acknowledge him in our lives, by the performance of those duties which he requires of us. But the consideration of these duties, will come under the third branch of our subject. We shall therefore here confine ourselves to a public profes-. sion of attachment to God as our God. This profession if it be good must be made through Jesus Christ as a Saviour; for it is through Christ alone that God will condescend to be our God. They there- fore who rightly acknowledge God to be their God, must at the same time acknowledge Christ to be their Saviour, and place all their hopes of acceptance with God on the mediation of Christ. The acknowledgment of God to be our God, or a pub- lic profession of religion, is the duty of all, who have come to years capable of knowing God. That it is the DUTIES REQUIRED IN THE FIRST COMMANDMENT. 87 duty of all to love and serve God, and make him their portion, is clearly evident from his character. He is su- premely excellent. He is the first cause and last end of all things. He is possessed of every possible perfection. He is all-sufficient, and the only portion that can satisfy the desires of an immortal mind, and make his rational creatures truly happy. It must therefore be our duty and our happiness to take him for our God. Further, he has laid us under unspeakable obligations to take him for our God, by his creating and preserving goodness, by the bounties of his providence, and by redeeming love. And if God be what he is, and be related to us as he is; and if it be our duty, therefore to take him for our God, to love and serve him, and make him our portion, it is certainly our duty to acknowl- edge before the world that he is our God, or in other words to make a public profession of religion. The duty of acknowledging, or publicly avouching the Lord to be our God is also clearly evident from Scripture. It was agreeably to the command of God that the Jews pub J licly avouched the Lord to be their God. And in the New Testament our Saviour taught, " whosoever shal! confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven." Mat. x. 32. 33. " Whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him also shall the Son of Man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father, with the holy angels — Mark. viii. 38. And in the Epistle to the Romans we read, " If thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead thou shalt be saved," Rom. x. 9. And again, " I beseech you there- fore brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service," Rom. xii. I. These texts and many others prove the duty of making a public profession of religion. This is the indispensable duty of all, to take the true God for their God, and own hira as such before the world. And therefore it is the duty of all who are capable of acting for themselves, to com(^ to that ordinance, wlijch God in his word has appointed to 88 SERMON LX. be the badge of a visible profession-viz. the ordinance of the Lord's Supper. Many are ready to suppose that it is not their duty, be- cause they are not prepared. But want of preparation forms no just excuse. We are criminal for being unpre- pared. What is it to be prepared publicly to acknowl- edge the Lord to be our God, but to give him our hearts, and with our hearts take him for our God ? This we are under indispensable obligations to do, and cannot for a moment neglect it without criminality. The want of love to God will therefore by no means take away our obliga- tions to make a visible profession of religion It is true we ought not to profess religion with a heart unreconci- led to God ; but we ought not to have such aheart, or cherish such a temper. It is our indispensable duty im- mediately to love God, and to have such a temper as w ould fit us with sincerity and truth publicly to profess that the Lord is our God. And every opportunity we have to make a public profession of religion, and neglect to do it, and to do it too with the sincerity and temper of a real christian, w^e neglect our duty, break the first com- mandment, ai.d sin against God. III. We proceed to the third branch of duty implied in the first commandment, viz. " to worship and glorify him accordingly." Knowing the character of the true God, and acknowledging him to be our God, by making a sincere profession of religion, it becomes us to worship and glorify him, according to this knowledge and this pro fession. This branch of duty implied in the first com- mandment is very extensive, and embraces the whole of practical religion. Knowing and acknowledging him to be the only true God, we ought to pay a religious worship to him alone. Since he is a spirit we ought to render him a spiritual worship and obedience ; as our Saviour reasoned, " God is a Spirit : and they that worship him, must worship him in spirit and in truth," John iv. 24. Being infinitely wor- thy of our attention, we ought to give him the chief place in our thoughts. As he is the most excellent being in the universe, and therefore the most worthy of our supreme esteem and love, we ought to give him our hearts, place our affections supremely upon him, and esteem and love him above all other things. As he is all-sufficient, a sat- DUTIES REQUIRED IN THE FIRST COMMANDMENT. 89 l"stying portion, and the only portion which can fully sat- isfy the soul, we ought to choose him as our portion, and in sincerity adopt the language of the Psalmist, "Whom have I in heaven but thee ? and there is none upon earth that I desire besides thee. God is my portion forever." Ps. r,xxiii. 25, 26. We ought to desire and to prize his favour above every thing else ; for " in his favour is life," Ps. xxx, 5. And his "loving kindness is better than life," Ps. lxiii. .3. As he is almighty in power, we ought to fear him above all other beings, and be afraid of sin which pro- vokes his wrath; and rather suffer any thing from men than sin against God. As he searcheth the heart and tri- eth the reins, we ought to have a holy frame of mind, and guard against sinful thoughts and desires as well as ac- tions. As he is every where present, we ought to act al- ways as under his all-seeing eye, and in such a way as we are conscious he will approve. As he is a God of truth, we ought to believe all that he has spoken ; and when we have evidence that any thing is his word, give an im- plicit credit to it. "Without faith it is impossible to please him; for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of such as diligently seek him," Heb. xi. 6. And here I would remark that the great gospel duty of faith in Jesus Christ is required in the first commandment, inasmuch as, that Jesus Christ is the Saviour of sinners belongs to the truth of God which the first commandment requires us to believe. Again, as God is a being of infinite wisdom, and therefore knows what is best for us, as he loves his people ^.vith a tender love, and as he is faithful to his word, and will perform what he has promised, it is our duty to put our trust in him, and place a firm reliance on his promises. As he is a holy God, it becomes us to hate sin, to repent of our sins, to turn from them with unfeigned sorrow, and to en- deavour to be holy in h6art and life as God is holy. As we are dependent on him for every blessing, and as he is a prayer hearing God, it becomes us to make our requests unto him, and ask him for such things as we need. As we derive every good gift from him, and as he dealeth bountifully with us, it becometh us to feel gratitude for his goodness, and render unto him thanksgiving and praise, When we reflect on his greatness and holiness, we ought to be filled with a sense of our comparative littlene^Sy VOL. II. 12 90 SERMON LXI. vileness and unworthiness ; and to feel and walk humbly before him. And when we consider his sovereignty and right of dominion over us, we ought to devote ourselves to his service, study his law, and render obedience there- unto. The disposition, thoughts, and desires, of our souls, the words that proceed from our lips, and all the actions of our lives ought to be in conformity to his law. We ought in heart word and deed to do those things which he requires, and carefully avoid whatever is displeasing to him. From comparing our character and lives, with the il- lustration which has now been given of the duties requi- red in the first commandment, we must all be convinced, that we have come short of our duty, and times without number have transgressed this commandment. How lit- tle 4o we know of the character of God, in comparison of what we might have known, from the privileges and op- portunities with which we have been favoured ? Those of us who have made the greatest improvement in divine knowledge, probably have reason to be ashamed, and are to blame. What then must be the criminality in this res- pect, of many, who scarcely know any of the first princi- ples of the oracles of God ? Is it our duty to acknow- ledge God to be our God, by giving our hearts to him and publicly professing our attachment to him ? Then they are living in the neglect of their duty who have never done this. And we have many among us who have nev- er yet, professedly avouched the Lord to be their God ; and we have reason to fear more who have never really given their hearts to him, and taken him for their God. Such are condemned by this commandment. And is it our duty to worship and glorify him accordingly .'' Then we have all come short of our duty. Even those of the people of God, who are living most to his glory, do not Worship and glorify him as they ought to do, or according to their knowledge of his character or their engagements to him. What then must we say of those who have nev- er yet in any degree sincerely worshipped and glorified him ? This commandment must condemn them. My brethren, in view of our duty as taught in the first commandment, we must all acknowledge that we are sin- ners, and have reason to put up the prayer of the publi- can, " God be merciful to me a sinner." Let the law, ATHEISM. 91 while by it we obtain the knowledge of sin, be a school- master to bring us to Christ. While in the glass of the law, we behold our failures and transgressions, let this teach us our need of a Saviour ; and lead us all to put our trust in his merits, that we may find pardon and acceptance in the sight of God. But while we trust entirely to his righteousness for par- don and acceptance before God, let us remember that obedience to the divine law is our duty, and essentially necessary to the christian character. Let us therefore be exhorted to do our duty, as taught in this command- ment.— Let us improve the privileges and opportunities we enjoy to become acquainted with the character of God. Let us acknowledge him to be our God, by first giving our hearts to him, and then openly professing our devotedness to his service — and let us worship and glori- fy him according to his character, and our profession of owning him as our God. Let us supremely esteem and love him. Let us take him as our portion. Let us fear, believe, and trust him. Let us pray unto him, be thank- ful for his mercies, and walk humbly before him. And let us devote ourselves to his service, and live in obedi- ence to all his commandments. May he by his grace en- able us thus to keep this commandment.— -Amen. SERMON LXL ATHEISM. EPHESIANS ii. 12. LAST CLAUSE, ^'' And without God in the worW* In this chapter the apostle contrasts the character and state of the Ephesian christians, as they then were, with what they had once been. They were then, when he wTote this epistle to them, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, brought nigh unto God, and reconciled to him by the blood of Christ, fellow citizens with the saints 92 SERMON hXW and of the household of God and were builded upon the foundation of the prophets and apostles, Jesus Christ him- self being the chief corner stone. But once they were dead in trespasses and sins; walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that worketh in the children of disobe- dience; had their conversation in the lusts of the flesh, ful- filhng the desires of the flesh and of the mind ; and were children of wrath. Gentiles in the flesh, called uncircum- cision, without Christ, aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, hav- ing no hope, and without God in the world. Such were the character and state of these Ephesians before con- version. One trait of this character, we have contained in our text, " And without God in the world." By this is meant, that they were destitute of a knowledge of the true God ; for they were idolaters ; and although they believed in the existence of a God or gods, they did not believe in the one only living and true God ; and al- so, that they lived without him, or denied him by their wicked works. Being without God in the world is a sin against the first commandment, " Thou shalt have no other gods before me"-Ex. XX. 3. The sins forbidden by this commandment are stated in our Catechism in the answer to the 47th question — TVhat is forbidden in the first commandment. , The first commandment forbiddeth the denying-, or not wor- shipping and glorifying the true God, as God amour God, and the giving that worship and glory to any other which is due to him alone.'''' According to this answer, the sins against the first com- mandment may be comprized under the general heads of atheism and idolatry. The object of the ensuing discourse is to treat of athe- ism. Atheism may be subdivided into speculative and prac- tical. By speculative atheism is meant, denying the be- ing of God ; and by practical atheism, living as though there were no God. I. Speculative atheism. — This may again be subdivided, into a professed denial of the being of a God of any kind, and a denial of the being of the true God, or that he is such a being as he is. ATHEISM. d3 There arc few, if any of the former kind of speculative atheists, who professedly deny the being of a God of any kind, and believe what they profess. On this kind of atheism we shall not here dwell, as its absurdity and wick- edness have been already shown in the discourse on the being of a God. But of the latter kind of speculative athe- ists, or of those who while they profess to believe in the being of a God, nevertheless professedly deny the being of the true God, we have reason to believe there are many in our world, and this too under the light of reve- lation. In this sense idolatry is atheism. For idolaters, though they believe in the existence of a God, or gods, neverthe- less deny the true God ; for their gods are no gods ; and therefore they are chargeable with atheism as well as idolatry. In this sense also, are those chargeable with atheism, who have low and improper thoughts of God, and look upon him to be such an one as themselves ; for the god in whom they profess to believe, is merely a creature of their own imaginations, and they do not believe in the true God. — Such were those spoken of Ps. l. 21. " Thou though test that I was altogether such an one as thyself" Again, they who deny the providence of God, are chargeable with atheism. Activity is essential to God. Therefore to suppose him to be an indolent, and inactive being, who neither cares for, nor regards the affairs of creation, is to rob God of an essential perfection and by consequence of his being. For take away what is essen- tial to the nature of God, and he ceases to be God. Be- sides he has, both in his works, and his word, taught his providence, or that he upholds and governs his works. They therefore who deny his povidence, deny him to be such a being as he has revealed himself to be, and there- fore deny the true God. Hence the Epicureans who among the ancient Heathen, denied the providence of God, were chargeable with atheism ; and this charge was fixed upon them by their fellow Pagans. Of this kind of atheism were those also guilty, spoken of, Ps. x. 11. " He hath said in his heart, God hath forgotten : he hideth his face ; he will never see it." And those also spoken of Ezek. viii. 12. "They say, the Lord seeth us not; the Lord hath forsaken the earth." 94 SERMON LXL They also who deny the doctrine of the Trinity are chargeable with atheism. For God has clearly revealed in his word that there are three distinct persons, the Fa- ther, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, subsisting in the divine essence. They therefore who deny that there are three distinct persons in the Godhead ; or who deny the divin- ity of the Son and the Holy Ghost, deny the true God. — For the true God is, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, three distinct and co-equal persons in one essence. Such per- sons make God to be something different from what he really is, and deny the true God ; and are therefore chargeable with atheism. Again, they who deny any of the divine perfections, are chargeable with atheism, for they rob God of what is essential to his being. There have been some who professedly denied the omniscience of God ; and some such persons may perhaps still be found. Thus we read, Ps. Lxxiii. ll,ofsome who said — " How doth God know ? and is there knowledge in the most High ? " and Ps. xciv. 7. " The Lord shall not see, neither shall the God of Jacob regard it." Such are guil- ty of atheism. There are also some who professedly de- ny his almighty power. Thus did the Israelites, when in the wilderness. Ps, Lxxviii. 19. 20. "They spake a- gainst God ; they said can God furnish a table in the wil- derness ? can he give br«ad also ? can he provide flesh for his people ?" Such are guilty of atheism. There are some again who professedly, or by implication deny the divine holiness and justice. Such are they who deny the atonement of Christ, and the necessity of aninterest in his righteousness for salvation ; who suppose that God will not punish sin ; and who presume upon his mercy without holiness of heart and life. The language of such senti- ments is that God is not infinitely holy and just. Such persons also are chargeable with atheism. The foregoing atheistical sentiments arise from differ- ent causes. They may however all be traced to depravi- ty of heart as their primary cause. Men do not like to retain the true knowledge of the true God in their minds ; therefore they form to themselves an idea of a God more congenial to their wishes, than is the true character of the kue God. Pride is one great cause of many wrong senti- ments respectingthe character of the true God. Another fruitful cause is ignorance. And here I would remark that ATHEISM. 95 ignorance, while it often leads to atheistical sentiments, is iteelf a breach of the first commandment and a great sin. The sentiment which has been frequently advanced and cherished, that ignorance is the mother of devotion, is dangerous and wicked. Ignorance, so far from being favorable to religion, has been a fruitful source of error, superstition, and wickedness. To know God is a duty required in the first commandment, and the want of this knowledge is a sin against this commandment ; and igno- rance of the truths of religion, especially in us who have so many means of information, is a great sin. II. To consider practical atheism. There are very few professed atheists, who openly deny the being of a God. There are many however, who hold some of the sentiments of which we have been speaking, and which are a denial of the being of the true God. But even of this kind of atheists, we have reason to believe there are, in a christian land, but few, compared with the kind of which we are about to speak. Practical atheists are nu- merous in our world. By a practical atheist we mean one, who while he professes to believe that there is a God ; and that he is such a God as he has revealed him* self to be, and really is, nevertheless does not worship and glorify this true God as God, and as his God ; but lives as though there were no God, or by his conduct contradicts what he professes to believe. To give a particular description of all the conduct in which practical atheism discovers itself, would be to bring into view every sin, which would require a volume in- stead of a single sermon ; we can therefore only make a few general remarks on this subject. If there be a God, and he be what he is, he ought to be frequently in our thoughts. Forgetfulness of God is therefore practical atheism. For what is this but prac-. tically saying God is not that glorious and worthy being %vhich he is ? If there be a God, and he be what he is, he ought to be known ; for we are most intimately concerned to know him, and he is an object infinitely worthy to be known.— Ignorance of God is therefore practical atheism. For what, is this, but practically saying that God is not so Avorthy as he is, and that it d©es not concern us what he is ? 96 SERMON Lxr. If there be a God and he be what he is, it is certainly our duty to fear him ; and the want of this fear is practi- cal atheism, as it is a practical denial of his power to punish disobedience. It is also our duty, in view of the divine character to act with sincerity, and to act always as in the presence of God. And to be insincere in our pro- fessions, and to do in secret what we would not do openly, are practical atheism, as they are a practical denial, that God searches the heart, and is omniscient and omnipre- sent. Hypocrisy is therefore practical atheism. If there be a God, and he be what he is, it is certainly our duty to love him supremely, and be thankful for his mercies ; for he is certainly from the excellence of his na- ture, and the instances of his goodness, worthy our su- preme love and our highest gratitude. And to feel no love, but on the contrary to exercise enmity towards him; and to exercise no gratitude, but on the contrary to be un- thankful, certainly are instances of practical atheism ; for such conduct is a practical denial of the excellence and the goodness of God. If there be a God and he be what he is, it is our duty to trust him. Despairing of his mercy, fearing to commit our ways unto him, and murmuring and repining at his providential dispensations, are therefore practical athe- ism. For these are a practical denial of his wisdom, power, truth, mercy, and faithfulness. Again, if there be a God, and he be what he is, it is certainly our duty to choose him as our portion, and to take him as our God, and worship him. If therefore we neglect these things, we are guilty of practical atheism. — For we hereby practically declare that God is not a sat- isfying good and portion, and we practically deny his right to us, and his worthiness of our worship ; which is to make him something different from what he is, and is a practical denial of the being of the true God. Hence they who neglect the duty of prayer, and any other of the ordinances of divine worship are practical atheist?. Once more, if there be a God, and he be what he is, he ought to be obeyed. Every omission of duty, and every positive transgression of any of the divine command- ments— ^in short every sin, whether in heart, word, or deed, and whether of omission or commission, is practical athe- ism ; as every sin is a practical denial of the authority ATHEISMi 97 of God, or his right to reign over us and give us laws ; of his righteousness in laying such commands upon us ; of his holiness or hatred of sin ; of his truth in his threatnings against sin ; and of his power to punish sin From what has been said we may see, 1. The inconsistency of many of mankind. They pro- fess to believe that there is a God, and such a God as he has revealed himself to be, and yet act as though there were no God. They profess to believe that there is a God in whose hands they are and who, is infinitely excel- lent and kind, and yet they forget him, make no exertions to become acquainted with his character, live in igno- rance of him, are unthankful, and neglect and refuse to love him. They profess to believe in his power, and yet do not fear him ; and in his omnipresence, and omni- science and yet act as though he did not see them. They profess to believe in his right to their worship and yet do not worship him. They profess to believe in his infinite wisdom, power, and faithfulness, and yetdo not trust inhim. They acknowledge his providence, and jet do not regard the operations of his hand. And they profess to believe in his right of authority over his creatures, his holiness, justice, truth, and power, and the dreadfulness of his wrath^ and yet live in rebellion. Surely there is great inconsisten- cy in this ! and that nature which is capable of acting thus must be greatly depraved. Such is our nature. Let us be humbled in view of this truth. Let us be ashamed of the inconsistency of our conduct, and endeavour in future to act more consistently, and according to what we pro- fess to believe concerning the true God. Let us not endeav- our as too many do to bring our sentiments, concerning the true God, and his religion, to correspond with our practice. This is one grand cause of infidelity. Men desire to be consistent. Hence, many, feeling no dispo- sition to alter their practice, gradually change their senti- ments to suit their practice. But let us take the word of God as our guide, and from it form our sentiments of the divine character. And if our practice does not corres- pond with what the character of God teaches us it ought to be, let us not alter our sentiments ^o suit our practice ; but let us change our practice thsit it may correspond with correct sentiments. 2. We learn from oyr subject, something of the evil na- VOL. 11. 13 9d SERMON LXI. ture and exceeding sinfulness of sin. Every sin, as we have seen, is practical atheism, as it is a practical denial of some of the perfections, and consequently of the being of the true God. Sin therefore which strikes at the very being of the infinitely perfect and glorious God, must be a great evil ; and must be infinitely hateful in his sight, and deserving of all that punishment, which he has threaten- ed against it. Let us therefore be impressed with a sense of the evil nature of sin. Let us seek pardon and deliv- erance from its dreadful consequences, in the way which God has been pleased to open, and which he has reveal- ed in the Gospel, viz, through faith in the atoning blood of the Redeemer. Let us exercise unfeigned and deep repentance for our sins ; and let us fear sin and watch and war against it. 3. We may learn from our subject, that dreadful misery must await those, who neglect and reject the salvatioci offered in the Gospel, and die with their sins unpardoned. For if sin be as we have seen, a practical denial of the true God, if in its tendency it would rob him of his glorious perfections and cast him down from the throne of the uni- verse, and even destroy his being, a dreadful punishment must await those who shall finally perish, when God comes to pour out his wrath upon them for their sins against him. In the language of the Psalmist, Ps. l. 22. be ex- horted, " consider this, ye that forget God, lest he tear you in pieces and there be none to deliver." There is opened, a way of pardon and reconciliation with God. — He has given his son to make atonement for sin, and work out such a righteousness as he will accept. He has finished the work which the Father gave him to do. Sal- vation through him is now offered to us. It is now an ac- cepted time and day of salvation. Let sinners therefore without delay accept of proffered mercy, by receiving the Lord Jesus Christ as he is offered in the Gospel, and put- ting their trust in him for salvation. 4. Finally, let christians from this subject be filled with a greater abhorence of sin. You profess not only to believe that there is a God, and that he is such a being as he is ; but also to take him as your God, and to fear, love, rever- ence, worship, and obey him. Sin in you is therefore peculiarly inconsistent ; and we may add peculiarly sin- ful. Always remember, that sin is a practical denial of IDOLATRY. 99 fhe perfections and being of God — it is practical atheism and strikes at the very existence of the Supreme Being. Let this thought be present when tempted to sin, and prevent its commission. — Amen. SERMON LXIL IDOLATRY. 1 CORINTHIANS X. 14. " Wlherefore my dearly beloved^ flee from idolatry.''* It was made a question among the Corinthian christians, whether it was lawful for them to sit down at the table of their Heathen neighbours, at their feasts, and partake with them of meat, which they were informed had been previously offered in sacrifice to idols. This question the Apostle decided in the negative ; because the practice; offended weak brethren, and was calculated to lead them astray; because it was a dangerous temptation -to idola- try ; and because it was itself a species of idolatry, as it was holding communion with idolaters in their idolatrous rites. To enforce his decision he reminded them of the example of the Israelites ; and hence he inferred our text, " wherefore my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry." The two great sins forbidden in the first commandment are atheism and idolatry. The former in its several kinds has already been considered. We come now in this dis- course to treat of the latter Idolatry a.s forbidden in the first commandment may be divided into two kinds, viz. I. The worshipping as God anything beside or instead of the true God. II. The giving to anything else that which is God's right., and due to him alone. The first is the Pagan idolatry ; the last prevails where the true God is acknowledged, and the worship of idols is discarded. 100 SERMON LXn. I. With respect to the first kind, or the Pagan idolatry, some suppose it was practised before the flood, among the posterity of wicked Cain. Of this however we have no conclusive proof. Be this as it may, it is certain, idolatry was practised not long after the flood. It prevailed in Chaldea, at and before the time Abraham was called of , which signifies an excess in religion, or doing things not required by the word of (lod, or abstaining from things not forbidden. Supersti- tion is expressly forbidden under the name of will-wor- ship. Col. ii. 20, 22, 2.3. " Why as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances — after the com- mandments and doctrines of men ! Whicli things have indeed a show of wisdom in will-worship." The same is condemned Deut. iv. 2. " Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish aught Irom it, that ye may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you." And Mat. xv. 9. " In vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the com- mandments ofmen." Of this superstition or will-worship we have many instances in the numerous rites and ordinan- ces, which tlie Romish church, have either superadded to those taught in the Scripture, or substituted in their place. Such are the holding to seven sacraments instead of two ; THE SECOND COMMANDMENT. Il3: the using of the wafer instead of bread, in the sacrament of the Lord's supper ; the withholding the cup from the laity ; the lifting up the bread in the sacrament of the Lord's supper, pretending that it is the real body of Christ, and bowing before it and worshipping it ; the use of spit- tle, salt, and cream, besides water, annointing \vith oil,and signing with the sign of the cross in badtism; the observance of stated fasts for a certain number of days ; fasting stated- ly on certain days of the week ; and abstaining from cer- tain kinds of food while others are allowed. There are numerous other rites and ordinances of a similar kind.— All these for which there is no command or warrant in the word of God, are superstition or will- worship, and are for- bidden by the second commandment. It is true there are certain circumstances respecting the ordinances of worship, concerning which, there is nothing determined in the word of God, but which are left to the discretion of the church ; such are the time and place, and the like circumstances of worship. But for the church to fix and change these according as convenien- cy may require, is very diflerent from undertaking to in- troduce new ordinaces, or to superadd to an ordinance something which the word of God does not warrant. We proceed, III. To consider the reasons annexed to this command- ment to enforce obedience to it. These reasons we have contained in the following words ; " for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquities of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me ; and showing mercy unto thousands 6^ them that love me and keep my commandments." — The reasons contained in these words may be included under three particulars, viz. God's sovereignty over us, his propriety in us, and the zeal he hath for his own wor- ship. 1. God's sovereignty. " I the Lord." This expresses the essential existence of God. God's sovereignty is foun- ded in his being what he is. He has an essential right to reign, and therefore to give us such laws as he pleases ; and it is our duty to obey his commandments. This rea* son runs thus, I am the Lord, the sovereign of all my crea- tures, whose will is always law ; therefore thou shalt obey itiy command, not to make unto thee any graven ima|;;e ©c VOL. II. 15 I 114 SERMON LXIII. the likeness ot anything &;c. thou shalt receive, observe, and keep pure and entire, the ordinances of worship ap- pointed in my word ; and shalt not worship me by images, nor by any ordinances and rites of thine own invention. 2. God's propriety in us. " I the Lord thy God." This brings into view the covenant of grace as a reason why we should observe the second commandment ; for it is in the covenant of grace alone that God offers himself to be, or does become the sinner's God.— God has a property in us arising not only from his being what he is ; but also from the relations he sus- tains to us of Creator, Preserver, Benefactor, and Re- deemer, and especially from the latter. This is the rela- tion particularly intended in the phrase, " thy God," He is a covenant God, and Redeemer. He offers himself in this character to all who hear the gospel ; and his visible people have avouched him to be their God. Therefore lie has a right to give us laws ; and it is our duty to receive, observe, and keep pure and entire his religious institutions, and not invent any of our own. 3. The third reason by which obedience to the second commandment is enforced is the zea/ which God hath for his own worship, which we have expressed in these words; " a jealous God, visiting the iniquities of the fa- thers upon the children unto the third and fourth genera- tion of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thou- sands of them that love me and keep my commandments." Jealous here signifies an earnest regard for his own insti- tutions. He is a sovereign and has a right to prescribe to his creatures the ordinances by which he will be wor- shipped ; and he has an earnest regard for the glory of his sovereignty, and will not suffer another, with impuni- ty, to endeavour to take it from him, either by slighting his institutions, or by assuming his prerogative ^nd inventing ordinances of their own. This jealousy or zeal which he hath for his own worship is shown, 1. By his accounting the breakers of this command- ment, such as hate him, and threatening to punish them unto the third and fourth generations. " Visiting the ini- quities of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me." The import of this argument appears to be as follows — False worship is a convincing; evidence of hatred Xo God ; and God so THE SECOND COMMANDMENT. 115 hates false worship, that he will not only punish the im- mediate transgressor, but will also punish his posterity unto the third and fourth generation. That the iniquities of the fathers are in the course of divine providence often visited upon the children is a fact of which we have abundant proof in history, both sa- cred and profane, and also in instances which have come under our own observation. We have often seen child- ren and chilren's children, injured in a temporal respect by the parents' misconduct and sins. And the conduct of parents has doubtless a great influence on the spiritual and eternal interests of their children. Where parents set a bad example before their children, or do nOt set a good one ; where they give them bad advice, or neglect to iustruct them in the knowledge of divine things ; where they despise or neglect the ordinances of divine appoint- ment, live in neglect of prayer, attention to the Scriptures, and the public worship and ordinances of God's house ; and especially where they practice false worship — do we not find that, although, there are exceptions, yet general- ly, their children grow up, and live as their parents did .'* I believe our own observation must convince us that this is generally the case. Further we must either admit that it is so or else deny the importance of a religious educa- tion, which is directly contrary to the Scriptures. Hence we have reason to believe that many children live and die irreligious, and go to misery, who if they had been placed in a different situation in the world, and had had diflfer- ent examples and instructions, from their parents, would have embraced true piety and obtained eternal salvation. We must admit this, or deny what every day's experience proves, viz. the influence of example and instruction ; and also what the word of God everywhere teaches, viz. the influence of the means of grace and especially the efficacy of prayer. So that however we may feel towards this de- claration, that God will visit the iniquities of the fathers upon the childi-en, facts teach us it is so ; and will not the judge of all the earth do right ? And here I would further observe, that children may suffer in this life for the iniquities of the parent, where they do make his sin their own. As for instance, if the parent be a drunkard, the children are often materially injured through life, in their respectability; estate, and 11-6 ^ SERMON txm. temporal comfort, by his sin, though they do not copy hr? example. But as it respects a future world, children will not be punished for the sins of parents, unless they make their sins, their own. It is true, there is very great dan- ger that they will follow their example ; but if they do not, they will not be involved in their guilt and ruin. This threatening ought to be duly considered by pa- rents ; and a regard to their children, as well as to their own souls, ought to lead them to love God, and keep his commandments, and especially to receive and observe the ordinances of his worship. By his providential deal- ings with the posterity of those who despise, slight, or ne- glect his ordinances, he manifests his zeal for his wor- ship. The reason why the third and fourth generation" are particularly mentioned some suppose to be, that natural affection will not operate further, because parents cannot expect to see more of their descendants, and are less con- cerned about their remote posterity ; or it may imply, that as the Lord is ready to forgive, the effects of sin in the pa- rents will cease after that period, unless the children per- sist in the sins of the parents. 2. God's jealousy or zeal for his own worship is further manifested, by his esteeming its observers, such as love him, and promising mercy unto them and to their posterity. *' And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments." By showing mercy unto thousands of them that love him, it is generally sup- posed, we are to understand the thousandth generation, that is a great many generations. This exposition is confirmed by other passages. Thus Deut. v. 29. we read, " O, that there were such an heart in them, that they would fear me, and keep all my commandments always, that it might be well with them, and with their children forever.^'' And in the days of the Apostle Paul the degenerate Jews were called, "beloved for the father's sake's." Rom. xi. 28. And we are assured in the Scriptures, that they shall yet, on account of their connex- ion with faithful Abraham, be brought into the church of Christ, and be made the subjects of spiritual blessings. What a blessing therefore is it to have pious parents ! And how important is it that parents should be faithful, especially in their observance of the ordinances of God, DUTIES REQUIRED IN THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. 117 and in teaching them to their children, since according to the second commandment, children and posterity are so much concerned in the parent's character and conduct. May these reasons have their due weight upon our minds And may God give us all, a temper of obedience to all his holy commandments. — Amen. SERMON LXIV, DUTIES REQ.U1RED IN THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. EXODUS XX. 7. " Thou shall 7iot take the name of the Lord thy God in vain : for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vam." The spirit of this commandment appears to be, to reg- ulate the manner of worshipping God. As the first com- mandment relates to the object, and the second to the means, so the third relates to the manner of worship. The commandment is expressed negatively, '• thou shalt 720/ take the name of the Lord thy God in vain." But as in the other commandments, so in this, duties are requir- ed as well as sins forbidden. By the name of God in this commandment, we are to understand, not only the names by which he is called ; but every thing by which he inaketh himself kiiown. In this sense our Catechism explain the word ; and this ex- planation is warranted by the Scriptures. Thus when Moses at the burning bush asked the Lord his name ; he answered, "I AM that I AM: thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you." Ex. iii. 14. Here name signifies a title. When at Sinai Mo- ses besought the Lord to show him his f^lory, he promised to proclaim the JS'anie of the Lord, Ex. xxxiii, 18, 19. " And the Lord passed by before him, and proclaimed, the Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious, long-?iil- 118 SERMON LXIV. fering, and abundant in goodness and truth, &c." Ex. xxxiv. 6. Here the name of the Lord signifies his attributes. Again Mai. i. 6, 7. ^' Ye say, wherein have we despised thy name? Ye offer polluted bread upon mine altar." Here, by the name of the Lord is evidently meant the ordinances of his worship. Again the Psalmist, Ps. cxxxviii. 2. saith, " thou hast magnified thy word, above all thy name ;" which teaches us that the name of the Lord may signify his word. Again, the Psalmist, Ps. viii. 9. after speaking of the works of God exclaims, " O Lord, our Lord, how excellent is thy name in all the earth" — where by his name, his works are evidently meant. Hence from comparing one part of Scripture with another, which is the true way of expounding God's word, we are war- ranted to adopt the explanation of our Catechism, that by the name of God, in the third commandment, is meant . every thing by which he maketh himself known ; and par- ticularly his names, properly so called, his titles, his attri- butes, his ordinances, his word, and his works. The object of the ensuing discourse is to illustrate the duties required in the third commandment. These duties are stated in our Catechism, in the an- swer to the 54th question, as follows, viz. " What is required in the third commandment ? " The third commandment requireth the holy and reverent use of God'^s names^ titles, attributes, ordimmces, word, and works^ The names of the Supreme Being are God, Lord, and Jehovah. — His titles are such as Lord of hosts, Holy One of Israel, Creator, Preserver of men, King of kings, Lord of lords. Father of mercies, &c. His attributes are those perfections and properties, by which he distinguishetli himself from his creatures, such as infinity, eternity, om- nipresence, omniscience, omnipotence, infinite wisdom, holiness, &c. His ordinances are prayer, preaching and hearing the word, sacraments, and the like. His word is contained in tlie Scriptures of the Old and New Testa- ments. And his works are those of creation, providence, and redemption. The duty required in the third commandment is to use all these with reverence. By reverence is meant an awe and fear, under a sense of the divine greatness. When- ever we use anything by which God maketh himself known, it becomes us to be filled with reverence under a DUTIES REQ.UIRED IN THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. 119 sense of the majesty of that God who is thus made known, (t becomes us to think of God with a solemn awe — when we use any of his names, titles or attributes, either in re- ligious worship or in conversation, it becomes us to do it with seriousness and solemnity, and impressed with a rev- erential awe of the greatness of that Being, who is meant by these names or titles, or to whom these attributes be- long. It becomes us to attend upon his ordinances, with seriousness and reverence, impressed with a solemn awe of the majesty of that God who manifests himself, and is w orshipped in these ordinances ; for, " God is greatly to be feared in the assembly of the saints, and to be had in reverence of all them that are about him," Ps. lxxxix. 7. It becomes us to read, hear, and speak of his word w ith seriousness, and with a deep reverence of that God who gave it, and who makes himself known by it. And it be- comes us in contemplating his works, to regard him as their author, and be filled with a reverence of him, whose power and wisdom shine forth in these works. Having made these general observations on the duties required in the third commandment, we shall in the re- mainder of this discourse, attend particularly to religious oaths, vows, and lots, the consideration of which belongs to the head of the third commandment. An oath is a solemn appeal to God as the searcher of hearts, for the truth of what we say, and implies an im- precation of his judgments, both in time and through eternity, if we do not speak the truth. That such appeals to God, on certain occasions, are lawful, and duty, appears clearly from his w^ord. The principal thing forbidden in the third commandment ap- pears to be a swearing falsely by the name of God, which implies that there is a lawful swearing by his name. Of the same import is a passage, Lev. xix. 12. " Ye shall not swear by my name falsely," which evidently implies the duty of swearing truly by his name. The duty is al- so taught in the following passages, Deut. vi. 13. " Thou shalt iiear the Lord thy God, and serve him, and shalt swear by his name." Deut. x. 20. " Thou shalt fear the Lord thy God : him shalt thou serve, and to him shalt thou cleave, and swear by his name." Is. xlv. 23. " Unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear." ISc T.xv. 16. " He that sweareth in the earth shall swear by 120 SERMON LXIV. the God of truth." Jer. iv. 2. " Thou shalt swear, the Lord Hveth, in truth, m judgment and in righteousness." And Heb. vi. 16. "Men verily swear by the greater: and an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife." From these texts it is evident, that an oath, properly made, is lawful and a duty. The same is confirmed by several examples in the Scriptures. In the Old Testament, we have several in- stances of the people of God swearing by his name. And in the New Testament we frequently find Paul making a solemn appeal to God, for the truth of what he said. In the Revelation we read that an angel shall in the last day swear by him that liveth forever and ever that time shall be no longer. And we have also, in the Scriptures, fre- quent instances of the great God himself swearing by himself All these examples prove the lawfulness of oaths, on proper occasions. They who object to the lawfulness of oaths under the christian dispensation, found their objections on a miscon- struction of a few passages, such as that of our Saviour, Mat. V. 34. " Swear not at all." And that of James, v. 12. "Above all things, my brethren, swear not." But we must explain Scripture consistently with itself; and it is certain, oaths were frequently practised and were lawfu-I under the Old Testament ; and also that in the New Tes- tament, Paul spake of an oath for confirmation being an end of all strife, which implied that they were still law- ful ; and that he himself made frequent solemn appeals ta God. Hence if the texts on which the objection is found- ed can be explained not to mean a solemn religious swear- ing, we are bound thus to explain them. They may sig- nify swearing in a profane way, and by the creature. It is said that at this time the Jews were much addicted to swearing in common conversation, and supposed it to be no crime, if they swore by the creature, as by heaven, by Jerusalem, by their head, and the like, and did not use the name of God. — Against this opinion and practice, the above texts appear to have been pointed ; and not against a rehgious swearing, when properly called to it. Having thus shown that oaths on certain occasions are lawful and a duty ; it will be proper to inquire as to the form and manner in which oaths ought to be administer- ed and taken, the occasion which warrants them, and the different kinds. DUTIES REQUIRED IN THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. 121 The fonn is of small importance. Various ceremonies are recorded in the Scriptures as having been used in taking an oath. When Jacob and Laban took a solemn oath to each other, they erected a heap of stones, and ate together upon it, and sware to each other. When Abraham made his servant swear, he ordered him to put his hand under his thigh. But the most common form of swearing, used of old, appears to have been the lifting up the hand to heaven. Thus Abraham sware Gen. xiv. 22. Thus the angel sware, Dan. xii. 7. ; and also the an- gel. Rev. X. 5. And indeed the lifting up the hand to heaven, and swearing, in Scripture import the same thing. Thus, Deut. xxxii. 40. " I lift up my hand to heaven and say, I live forever." This form of swearing by lifting up the hand to heaven, is the preferable mode, because it most frequently occurs in the Scripture history, and it is sanctioned by the highest authority, even by the example of the most eminent saints, and of angels, and of God himself As to the form generally used in this land, in taking an oath, by laying the hand on the Bible, and kis- sing the book, we have no example or precept for it in the Scriptures, and therefore it is not so eligible as lifting the hand to heaven. But'as it is the legal form, and the thing principally to be looked at in an oath, is the solemn appeal to God therein made, whatever be the form of making it ; and as there were various forms used in the Scripture times, besides that of lifting the hand, and were not condemned, it may be proper for christians to comply with the form in common use. As to the manner in which an oath ought to be admin- istered and taken. — It ought to be administered with great solemnity, calculated to fill the person who takes it with a solemn awe and fear of that God to whom he makes an appeal ; and where the nature of an oath is not known or fully understood, it ought to be explained. The per- son who takes an oath, ought to do it with a due impres- sion of its solemn import, and filled with reverence of the Being whom he calls to witness, and be strictly careful as he would avoid his wrath, that he utter nothing false, or of which he has the least doubt. As to the occasion on which an oath ought to be taken, we may observe, that such a solemn appeal to God ought not to be made on every trivial occasion. An oath VOL. ir. 16 122 SERMON LXIV. is an act of religious worship, in which there is an ac- knowledgment of the divine perfections, and an appeal to God as the searcher of hearts. The matter therefore which calls for such an appeal, ought to be of importance. And the multiplying of oaths, and taking them on every trivial occasion, is trifling with the name of God, lessens very much the solemnity of an oath, increases the danger of frequent perjury, and is a serious evil to society. Oaths are of two kinds, assertory Q.nd promissory. An assertory oath respects evidence relative to things done. A promissory oath, hath respect to things to be done, in which we oblige ourselves to do tliem, and call God to witness our sincerity in making the promise, and impre- cate his judgments in case we do not fulfil our promise. In making a promissory oath the following things should be observed. 1. The thing promised to be done ought to be lawful. We ought not to swear to do any thing repugnant to the law of God, or to the legitimate obedience which we owe to the civil magistrate. Of this nature was the oath which the more than forty Jews took, that they would neither eat nor drink until they had killed Paul, Acts, xxiii. 12. Such oaths are in their very nature unlawful a*hd wicked, and ought not to be kept. Not that they can be broken without sin. It is a great sin to make such oaths ; but it would be a still greater sin to keep and fulfil them. 2. The thing promised ought to be such that it can be performed. If we promise an impossibility the oath is not binding. If the impossibility is known at the time of making the oath, it is a rash, presumptuous, and wick- ed action, and the sin consists not in breaking such an oath but in making it. But if the impossibility does not appear, or is not known or suspected at the time of mak- ing the oath, but in the course of Providence arises after- wards, the oath is not binding ; nor are we chargeable with taking God's name in vain, either in making or break- ing such an oath. 3. A person ought to be possessed of the exercise of his reason to make an oath binding upon him. 4. A promissory oath, according to some, to be binding, ought to be made voluntarily. But it is at least question- able, whether an oath extorted by force is not binding on the conscience .'* On this subject casuists differ. If the DUTIES REQUIRED IN THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. 123 speaker were to express an opinion, it would be that such an oath is binding. Men ought either not to swear, but to risk consequences ; or else they ought sacredly to per- form what they have called God to witness they will do. In support of this opinion is a passage, Ps. xv. 4. spoken of a citizen of Zion — " He sweareth to his own hurt and changeth not." And here I would observe as a qualifi- cation of the above, that the thing thus promised, to be binding, must affect only our own private interest, and not the interest of another or the public good. 5. If a promissory oath is made conditionally, it is bind- ing only on the condition on which it is made. As for in- stance, if I bind myself by oath to do a certain benefit to another, on condition that such an event take place, or the other person do something else, — if the event does not take place, or the other person does not fulfil the con- dition, I am not bound by my oath. 6. If a person binds himself by oath to do something to another, if the person to whom he has bound himself sees fit to discharge him from his oath, the obligation to perform it ceases. Keeping these exceptions in view, where a promissory oath has been made, by a person in the exercise of his reason, binding liimself to the performance of a thing lawful, and possible to be performed, and if it be condi- tional the condition has been fulfilled, and if it be made to do some benefit to another, who has not discharged him from the obligation, he ought most sacredly to keep and fulfil what he has sworn to do. Though he has sworn to his own hurt, or the injury of his own private worldly in- terest, he cannot change or break his oath, without per- juring himself and incurring great guilt in the sight of God. And here I would remark that oaths taken by civil of- ficers, for the faithful discharge of their duty, are promis- sory oaths. Every thing promised ought therefore to be well considered ; and no person ought to take an oath of office, unless he sincerely intends to perform every partic- ular of the duties, which he thus solemnly engages to perform ; and after having taken such an oath, he ought to feel the awfully solemn situation in which he is placed, as having called the great God to witness that he will perform such and such duties, and imprecated his wrath 124 SERMON LXIV. if he docs not ; and he ought to study his duty, and how- ever difficult or unpopular the faithful performance of it may be, he cannot neglect it without great guilt in the sight of God ; and the oath under which he has brought himself ought to weigh down every consideration of per- sonal ease or popularity. Alas ! have we not reason to fear that oaths of office are too often considered, as mere introductory forms, while the great obligations under which they bring a person are forgotten, or slighted, and neglected, and thus great guilt incurred ? There are two other points which ought to be consid- ered while treating of oaths. The first is whether equivocations and mental reserva- tions can release a person from the obligation of an oath, according to the received meaning of its expressions. Many, especially in the church of Rome, have plead for the lawfulness of equivocations and mental reservations. But they defeat the very end of an oath, which the apos- tle tells us is for confirmation, and the end of strife. They are a species of deceit ; for the words which are inten- ded to communicate the thoughts of the heart convey an impression different from the reality ; and this deceit is covered, and mankind the more easily imposed upon, by an appeal to God. Breaking an oath under such preten- ces, as that we meant something different from the plain meaning of the words we used, or that we made a reserve in our own minds, is perjury, and may we not add perju- ry aggravated by intentional deception. The other point is, whether oaths made to those we esteem heretics ought to be kept. The Papal church in the Council of Constance determined this question in the negative. On this principle they acted towards the pious John Huss and Jerome of Prague. To induce them to appear before the Council at Constance, the Emperor of Germany had sworn to them that they should be protect- ed from violence, and sent back safe ; but when they ap- peared, the Council determined that faith was not to be l^ept with heretics, and accordingly condemned and put them to death. On the same principle when kings were excommunicated, or embraced the principles of the Re- form;/tion, the Pope undertook to absolve their subjects from their oaths of allegiance to them. Many arguments might be adduced from Scripture to DUTIES REQUIRED IN THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. 125 refute this pernicious error. Let the following examples suffice. The Gibeonites were Heathen, and they belong- ed to those very wicked nations whom the Lord had de- voted to destruction, whom the Israelites were commis- sioned to destroy, an 148 SERMON LXVII. And after this, can a person expect any thing else, if he swear falsely, but the execution of that curse which he has imprecated ? From all that has been said, we conclude that perjury is a sin very dangerous to society, and exceedingly displea- sing to God ; and a sin which renders the person guilty of it, worthy of the abhorrence and punishment of men, and exposes him to the dreadful judgments of God, which without repentance will assuredly fall upon him. We proceed as was proposed, II. To inquire into some of the causes of this sin. The great cause is the corruption of the human heart, which weakens and destroys the fear of God ; and what- ever has a tendency to increase this corruption, and lessen a reverence for God, and banish his fear, increases the liability to perjury. But there are some causes which have a more direct influence. 1. The frequency of oaths is probably one great cause of perjury. Oaths are so multiplied that they are requi- red frequently to be taken on very trivial occasions. This undoubtedly has a tendency to lessen the solemnity of an oath ; for by means of the frequency of oaths, we have reason to fear they are often considered as a mere legal formality. Even the Heathen thought, that the frequen- cy of oaths, would increase the danger of perjury. For we are told that the ancient philosophers were so afraid of perjury, that an oath before a judge was never admit- ted, but for w ant of other proof Plato's precept was, *' not to administer an oath wantonly, but on deep grounds and with the strictest caution." And Clinias, another Heathen, was so very scrupulous, that rather than take an oath (though lawful) he suffered the loss of three tal- ents: 2. Another cause of perjury is the manner in which oaths are often administered. To impress the minds of those who take an oath with a fear of perjury, it ought to be administed in a solemn manner. But it is doubtless a fact that oaths are frequently administered with little or no solemnity. This want of solemnity in the administra- tion of oaths, is undoubtedly one cause of perjury ; and men would less frequently commit this crime, if oaths were always administered to them in a manner calculated 10 make them feel their solemnity, and fill them with a fear of the God whom they call to witness. PERJURY. 149 3. Another, and a principal cause of perjury is the common practice of profane swearing. This in itself is an exceedingly wicked practice, and it is rendered more so by the consequences to which it naturally leads ; and this is one of its evil consequences. For swearing in common conversation, doubtless has a tendency to lessen and de- stroy the fear of God in the person who practices this vice. But whatever tends to lessen the fear of God, un- doubtedly, tends to lessen security against perjury. For the fear of God is the grand security against this vice. — Otherwise, why does the law require an oath, or an ap- peal to be made to God ? It is true, the fear of God is in- tended to be strengthened by the penalties of human laws. But if human penalties were the only, or the chief secu- rity, against perjury, simple affirmation, or denial, or pro- mises, would answer every purpose of an oath. The fear of God is the great security against perjury ; and whatev- er therefore tends to lessen or destroy this fear, must tend to open a door to perjury. But profane swearing, un- doubtedly tends to lessen and destroy the fear of God. — He that can without remorse trifle with the tremendous name of God, and take it in vain in common conversation, can certainly have little or no fear of God before his eyes. And can we suppose that he who can break, without re- morse,, the oaths which he makes in common conversation, will have the fear of God before his eyes to restrain him from perjury, when under an oath administered by lawful authority ? The fear of man, or a sense of honour may be some security ; but when the passions of such an one, or his worldly interest, or the interests of his friends prompt him to perjury, and he is in no danger of detection and punishment by human laws, we have no reason to sup- pose that the fear of God will prevent him ; when he manifests by his oaths, which he makes and breaks in com- mon conversation, almost every day, tliat he has no fear of God before his eyes. 4. Another cause of perjury may be, that those who commit this crime, are seldom brought to punishment. This may arise from two causes, viz. the difficulty of convicting a false swearer, and tlie remissness of men to endeavour to bring such to justice. 5. I mention one other cause of perjury, and that is, a disregard to truth in common conversation. A man who 150 SERMON LXVII. is addicted to lying in the ordinary occurrences of life, will certainly have a much stronger propensity to with- hold the truth, or speak untruth, when under oath, and thus perjure himself, than one who has a strict regard to veracity in common conversation. In view of this subject, let us seriously consider the evils of perjury to society, and how much it provokes the wrath of God ; and let us as we regard the welfare of society and the favour of God, most sacredly and strict- ly keep our oaths. When called to bear testimony un- der oath, let us always feel a fear of that God whom we have called to witness ; and remembering that his eye is upon us, let us speak the truth, the whole truth and noth- ing but the truth. And when we are about to promise under oath to perform any duty, let us well consider what we are about to engage, and when we have sworn let us sacredly adhere to what we have engaged to do. And let those especially who take oaths of office, which are promissory oaths, study well what they promise and what they call God to witness they will perform. And unless they intend at all hazards, sacredly and strictly to perform the duties, they had far better relinquish their offices than risk the awful wrath of God which awaits the perjured. Let not ease or popularity or any other con- sideration outweigh their regard to their oath. If they do, let them remember, that although they may escape punishment from men, there is a day of judgment coming, whei) the Lord will not hold them guiltless that take his nam^ in vain. And this brethren, permit me to say, we have reason to fear will be an awful day to many per- sons, who have taken and violated oaths of office. And if there be any present who are guilty in the sight of God of having ever violated their oaths, either by speaking, when under oath, any thing but the truth, or keeping back part of the truth ; or by not performing all that they promised under oath they would perform ; let them be sensible that they are guilty of a very great crime ; and although their character may stand fair before men, let them remember they must soon stand at the bar of a righteous Judge, whom they have called to witness, and who will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. But notwithstanding the sin of perjury is very hein- ous ; yet if even the perjured will truly repent they shall PERJURY. 151 find mercy. For the penitent shall find mercy, though their sins have been as scarlet and of a crimson die. If then any such atrocious sinners are present, let them re- pent without delay, and flee by faith to the blood of Christ which cleanseth from all sin. And since perjury is a vice so dangerous to the inter- ests of society, and so much exposes to the wrath of God, let all who love their country, and who regard the favour of God, be exhorted to guard against those causes which may lead to this sin in themselves, and as much as in them lies to prevent their influence on others. Live in the fear of God, and pursue those courses which may cherish this fear, and avoid those which may tend to lessen or destroy it. Let those who administer oaths do it with solemnity. Let a sacred regard to truth ever be maintained in the common occurrences of life. Let those who are addic- ted to the heart hardening sin of profane swearing, break off from it ; and let all guard against it, shun it, frown upon it, and endeavour to suppress it in others, as one of the greatest causes of perjury, and the bane of society ; and let us never overlook or connive at perjury in others, when we have reason to believe they have been guilty of it ; but according to our station and opportunity endeav- our to bring them to justice, as dangerous members of society. We have now, brethren, in a series of discourses atten- ded to the duties required and the sins forbidden in the third commandment. It will be proper now to consider the reason annexed to this commandment, the more to enforce obedience to it. The reason we have contained in these words, '• for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain." Or as our Catechism ex- plain it in answer to the 56th question. " What is the reason annexed to the third commandment ? The reason annexed to the third commandment is, that however the breakers of this commandment may escape punishmcni from men, yet the Lord our God will not suffer them to escape his righteous judgment.''^ This reason implies that breaches of this commandment often go unpunished by man ; and it appears to contain a tacit reproof that it is so much the case. It is true that some of the breaches of this commandment lie out of the reach of human censures ; but there are some that do 152 SERMON LXVII. come within their reach, which are very little regarded or attended to by human authority. And where laws are enacted against certain breaches of this commandment, in most cases, but little regard appears to be paid to the real wickedness of the crime in fixing the penalty ; but attention is paid chiefly, if not entirely, to the supposed damage which human society may suffer. And how rare- ly are some of these laws put in force ! For instance, the law forbids profane swearing, and renders the transgres- sor liable to a pecuniary penalty, but the law is very sel- dom enforced. And with respect to the other breaches of this commandment forbidden by the laws, the laws are probably but seldom enforced, in comparison with the number of transgressions which occur. It is too true that the breakers of this commandment, often escape punishment from men ; and it is also true, that the Lord will not suffer them to escape his righteous judgment. He will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain He searcheth the heart, and knoweth ev- ery breach of this commandment. He is a God jealous for the glory of his name. And although his vengeance against the transgressor may seem now to sleep, yet there is a day coming and near at hand when those who have taken his name in vain must stand at his awful bar ; and then will be seen the dreadful import of the words, '* the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain." This is an awful sanction by which obedience to this commandment is enforced. Let it deeply impress our minds, and lead us always to reverence and fear that holy and fearful name the Lord our God. Let us always use with reverence every thing by which Godmaketh himself known — his names, titles, attributes, ordinances, word, and works. Let us fear ever to use the name, titles or attri- butes of God in a light, trifling or profane way. Let us ohun irreverence, formality, and hypocrisy in the use of his ordinances. Let us guard against neglecting, deny- ing, or scoflfing at his word ; or denying or profaning or abusing his works. And especially let us guard against the prominent and heinous sins of blasphemy, profane swearing and cursing, and perjury. Whenever tempted to any of these sins, let this awful sentence, " the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain," de- ter us. And let it lead those to break off from their sins. THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 153 who are in any way, living in a breach of this command- ment ; and excite them to endeavour by unfeigned re- pentance, and a true faith in the atoning blood of the Sa- viour to escape the execution of this dreadful sen- tence— May the Lord ever fill us all with reverence for his ho- ly name. — Amen. SERMON LXVIIL THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. EXODUS XX. 8, 9, 10, 11. '"'' Remember the Sabbath day to keep it hohj. Six day's- shall thou labour and do all thy. work ; but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God : in it thou shaltnot do any work, thou^ nor thy son^ nor thy daughter, thy man servant, nor thy maid servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates : For in six days the Lord made heav^en and earth, the sea and all that in them is, and rested the sevehth day : wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it ^ As the first commandment respects the object, the se*' cond the means, and the third the manner of worship, so the fourth respects the time. It teaches what portion of lime, God has particularly set apart for himself, to be spe- cially employed in his worship, viz. one day in seven ; it shows how this day ought to be observed ; and it presents reasons to enforce its observance. We shall in this discourse attend to the following pouit?, viz. I. When was the Sabbath first instituted }' H. Is it of moral and perpetual obligation .? in. Has the Sabbath been changed from the seventh tp the first day of the week } IV. When does the Sabbath begin. J. When was the Sabbath first instituted } VOL. H. 20 154 SERMON LXVIII. We are not to place the first institution of the Sabbath at the time the moral law was given at Sinai, and com- mitted to writing on tables of stone ; neither are we to place it, as some would do, at the time the manna was given in the wilderness of Sin, before the Israelites came to Sinai; but we are to place its first institution, imme- diately after the completion of the works of creation, on the seventh day from the beginning. This appears from the manner in which the sacred his- torian speaks of the seventh day in the 2d. chapter of Genesis. After having in the first chapter given an ac- count of of the six days creation, he adds in the beginning of the second chapter," and he rested on the seventh day from all his works which he had made, And God bles- sed the seventh day, and sanctified it." To sanctify sig- nifies to make holy, or to separate any thing to a holy use. And the natural construction of this passage is, that God now set apart the seventh day to a holy use, or sanctified it as a day of holy rest. And accordingly wc find in the fourth commandment, that God's resting on the seventh day from the works of creation, is given as the reason ol the institution of the Sabbath. " For iu six days, the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day ; wherefore' the Lord bles- sed the Sabbath day and hallowed, [or sanctified] it." The first place in which we find express mention made of the Sabbath is, in the J 6th chapter of Exodus, at the time the manna was given in the wilderness of Sin, before the promulgation of the law from Mount Sinai. But the manner in which the Sabbath is there mentioned, evi- dently shows that it was not then first instituted. Di- rections were given to prepare for the Sabbath, before any mention of it was made. The Lord after having in- formed Moses, that he would rain for the children of Is- rael bread from heaven, and ha^'ing given directions con- cerning their daily gathering it, added," and it shall come to pass, that on the sixth day they shall prepnre tliat w Inch they bring in ; and it shall be twice as much as they gather daily." Ex. xvi. 5. Here preparation for the Sab- bath was required, without a word concerning its insti- tution, and even Avithout mentioning the name. And we do not find the name mentioned until near the close of the chapter, when Moses, the sixth day having come, repeat- THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 155 ed the directions which he had given. The whole of what is said in this chapter relative to the Sahbath, teach- es that it was instituted before this time. If it be objected to placing the first institution of the Sabbatli as early as tlie creation, that no mention is made of its observance from that time down to the time of Moses. We may answer, that the sacred historian, previous to his own time is very brief But although no express mention is made of the Sabbath, yet we have several hints, from which we may collect that the Sabbath was probably ob- served during this period. In the days of Cain and Abel it is said, Gen. iv. 3,4. "In process of time it came to pass that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an oflfering unto the Lord. And Abel he also brought of the firstlings of his flock." A literal translation of the original occording to some criticks would be, '• in the end of the days, or on the last of the days," that is, probably, on the last day of the week. If this criticism be correct, here was religious worship performed, peculiarly on the seventh day. And why on this day, unless it was observed religiously, or was a Sabbath ? In the time of Noah, we know that days, were divided into periods of sevens, or weeks. And why this division, unless it was made for the observ^ance of the Sabbath ? In the time of Job, there appears to have been a certain day appointed for the special service of God, when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord. This was probably the Sabbath. Among the Heathen nations, in the earliest ages of which we have any account, we find that time was divided into weeks, and that the seventli day was esteemed sacred. We can- not suppose that the Heathen had this institution from the Jews ; tor they too much hated and despised them to bor- row this custom from them ; but we have every reason to suppose that this institution was handed down to them by tradition from their lathers, long before the existence of the Jewish nation ; and if this be. correct, it is a convin- cing argument, that the Sabbath was observed in the ear- ly ages. Besides, if we had not the least trace left, from which we might infer that the Sabbath was probably observed from Adam to Moses, it would, by no means certainly follow, that it was not observed ; for this is no more than what happens in a period, in which the 156 SERMON LXVill. history is much more full and particular. We have no mention made of the ohservance of the Sabbath from the time of Moses to that of David ; but we cannot therefore conclude that during this time it was not observed, or in force. For the foregoing reasons we conclude that the Sab- bath was instituted on the seventh day from the beginning, when God rested from his works, and blessed the se- venth day and sanctified it. This point is of some mo- ment as it derogates from the dignity and importance of the Sabbath to suppose, that the first ages of the world, for above two thousand years lived without such an institution. II. The second inquiry proposed to be considered was, is the Sabbath of moral and perpetual obligation ; o-r was it merely typical and ceremonial, and therefore done a- way by the coming of Christ? I answer, the substance of the Sabbath is of moral and perpetual obligation. The dedication of a certain portion of our time, particularly, to the service and worship of God, is in the highest sense moral, and of perpetual obligation. For it is a dictate of nature if there be a God he ought to be worshipped, and that a certain portion of time should be set apart particu- larly for this purpose. But whether this part should be the sixth, seventh, eighth, or any other portion, the hght of nature could not have discovered. This, God hath been pleased to fix by a positive institution, commanding the seventh part to be kept. And this commandment being given, is of perpetual obligation, unless he who gave it, should revoke it and fix another. That the fourth commandment is of perpetual obliga- tion, and therefore still in force as it respects the dedica- tion of the seventh part of our time particularly to the worship of God, we argue from this consideration, that it was delivered from Mount Sinai, among the other com- mandments of the decalogue ; and all the others are ac- knowledged to be of perpetual obligation ; and it was, with the others, written by God, indicating their perpetu- ity, on tables of stone. But the strongest and most con- vincing argument in favour of the morality and perpetuity of the Sabbath, may be drawn from the beneficial eflfects resulting from its observance, and the pernicious conse- quences which would follow if it were done away. Our Saviour said, " The Sabbath was made for man, and not THE FOURTH C0M2VIANDMENT. 157 man for the Sabbath" Mark ii. 27. Man was made first, and then the Sabbath was instituted for him. or for his good. And hath God ceased to be as benevolent to man as he formerly w^as r Tlie constitution of man is such that a day of rest from bodily labour, and employment is ne- cessary to refresh and invigorate it. And if it were not for the wise intervention of this day, many covetous per- sons would soon, by continued labour, impair the vigour of their own constitutioiis and especially those of their ser- vant's. And we find, given as a reason for the obser- vance of the Sabbath, Deut. v.' 14, " That thy man-ser- vant, and thy maid-servant may rest as well as thou." — The same reason for its observance certainly still con- linues. Further it is an undeniable fact, that by means of the Sabbath, virtue is promoted ; and virtue is of great im- portance to the well being of civil society. It is I believe a true observation, that virtue among a people, living un- der the liglit of revelation, ha,s prevailed in proportion \p the strict observance of the Sabbath ; and that on the contrary as the Sabbath has been neglected and violated, the corruption of morals among a people has increased. And has the Sabbath such an important influence on the morals of a people, and therefore on civil and social happiness, and must not the institution be of moral and perpetual obligation ? But there arc other and still more important effects which result to mankind from this benevolent institution. Man has an immortal soul. He was not made for this world alone ; but he is destined to an eternal existence in a future world. His chief concern therefore lies with eternity. This being the case, it follows, that whatever is calculated to have a favourable influence on his ever- lasting felicity, is highly beneficial to him. Now that«thc Sabbath is of peculiar use to prepare man for tlie future world, there can be no reasonable donbt. By means of the Sabbath the knowledg-e and the fear of God are sijr- nally promoted among men. Many in the lower classes of society can command little or no time, but the Sabbath, to gain religious knowledge, and without this day would in all probability live in ignorance of God and religion and consequently lose eternal happiness ; and many in the higher circles, who have time would not take it, were 158 SERMON LXVIIL it not for the salutary restraints of the Sabbath. We who respect and observe the Sabbath, know from experience that the business and amusements of the world, frequent- ly, in the short period of a single week, cause us almost to lose the impressions which the exercises of the Sabbath may have made upon our minds. What tlien would be the case if we had no Sabbath ? We have every reason to believe, we should have no religion among us; and if the Sabbath were i'orgottcn on the earth, we have every rea- son to believe religion would be unknown. Furtiier the exercises of this day have been and still are accompanied with the peculiar blessing of God to multitudes of indi- viduals. That the preceding remarks on the utility of the Sabbath are correct, I confidently appeal to the judg- ment of every enlightened, reflecting, and candid person in this assembly. And if correct, they form a convincing proof of the morality of the Sabbath, and the perpetuity of the obligation to observe it. For the Sabbath is as useful now and necessary as it ever was And (lod is certainly as benevolent as he formerly was. Besides as he forbids will-worship, or religious institutions which he has not conmianded, we cannot suppose that he would bless the Sabbath, if the institution were now abolished. But unquestionably, he does in an eminent manner, bless the observance of this day. From all these considerations we conclude that the Sabbath was not done away by the coming of Christ ; but that the institution is still in force, and the obligation to observe it is still bindins;. The only objection to the perpetuity of the Sabbath under the christian dispensation, which appears worthy to be noticed here is, one drawn from Col. ii. 16, 17. — '•' Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holy day, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days ; which are a shadow of things to come : but the body is of Christ." The answer which may be given to this objection is, that' by the Sabbath days here spoken of, we are to understand, not the weekly Sabbath ; but the Jewish festivals which are of- ten called Sabbaths. And that the Apostle did not mean the weekly Sabbath appears from his own practice and that of the churches in his day, observing a weekly Sabbath. Or if he meant the weekly Sabbath, we may THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 159 explain it of the seventh day Sahbath, whicli as we shall presently see was abolished, at the resurrection of Christ, and the first day Sabbath substituted in its place. We proceed as was proposed, in. To show that the Sabbath has been changed from the seventh to the first day of the week. The true doctrine on this point, we have stated in the answer to the 59th question of our Shorter Catechism. " Which day of the seven hath God appointed to be the week- Iij Sabbath ? From the beginning of the world to the resurrection of Christy God appointed the seventh day of the week to be the weekly Sab- hath ; and the first day of the week ever sitice, to continue to the end of the worlds ivhich is the christian SabbathP That at the resurrection of Christ, the tirst day of the week became the Sabbath, and is to be observed as such by christians, may be proved by the following considera- tions. We find the primitive disciples, frequently assembled together for religious worship on the first day of the week. We read, John xx. 19. that after the resurrection of Christ and before his ascension, Jesus appeared to his dis- ciples on this day. " Then the same day at evening, be- ing the first day of the week, when the doors were shut, w here the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews^ came Jesus, and stood in the midst, and saith unto them peace be unto you." We read again John xx. 26. " And after eight days," that is according to the Jewish manner of speaking, on the eighth day, including both first days, that is, on the next first day, again his disciples were with- in, and Thomas with them. Then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, peace be un- to you." Here we find the disciples immediately after the resurrection of Christ, twice assembled together on the first day of the week ; and we find their Lord particu- larly selecting this day to appear to them, and speak peace to them, and thus approving of their meeting to- gether on this day. After the ascension of Christ, we find the disciples as- sembled together on the day of Pentecost, which was the first day of the week. On this day he sent down the Ho- ly Ghost upon them, and thus again put a peculiar hon- our on the first day» J 60 SERMON LXVIII. Again Acts xx. 7. we read, " upon the first day of th<^ week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them ready to depart on the mor- row." Frori) this text it appears, that the first day of the week was the usual time of meeting together for religious worship, and the celebration of the Lord's Supper. And it is worthy of r .^cice as a further confirmation of this, that Paul h^d spent at this place seven days, and the day before was the Jewish Sabbath ; but we hear of no meet- ing or preaching on that day. Agairs i^aul wrote to the Corinthians, 1. Cor. xvi. 1, 2. " Concerning the collection for the saints, as I have given order to the churches of Galatia, even so do ye. Upon the first day of the week let every one of you lay by him in store, as God hath prospered him, that there be no gath- erings when 1 come." Here a collection for the poor saints was recommended to be made on every first day of ;the week. But why on this day, rather thin any other, sunless it was that the church was then statedly assem- bled together for religious worship on the christian Sab- bath.?» From the preceding texts we learn that it was custom- ary for the Apostles and primitive disciples statedly to meet together for rehgious worship on the first day of the week, and that Christ signally honoured that day, which af- fords at least a strong presumptive argument, of the change of the Sabbath from the seventh to the first day of the week. Again Rev, i. 10. the first day of the week is called the Lord's day. " I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day." By the Lord's day is evidently meant the first day of the week, so called because Christ the Lord on this day arose trom the dead. This is confirmed by the circumstance that the primitive church called the first day of the week the Lord's day. From this text we learn that Christ lays a peculiar claim to the first day of the week as his; which proves tliat it is to be observed as holy time, and there- fore is the christian Sabbath. In addition to the foregoing proofs drawn from Scrip- ture, we may observe that the first day of the week was kepi bv the christian church from the earliest times. Ig- natius who li^ ed in the beginning of the second century ad- v^ised every one who loved Christ to celebrate the Lord'? THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 161 day, which was consecrated to his resurrection ; and he calls it the queen and chief of all days. Justin Martyr, who lived in the middle of the second century, hath this sentence in his writings, " on the day which the Heathen call Sunday, all who live in cities or villages meet to- gether in the same place, where the writings of the Apos- tles and prophets are read," and in the third century we have frequent proof that the christians were distinguish- ed by the character of observers of the Lord's day. The history of the church in the earliest ages of Christianity prove that the first day of the week was then observed as the christian Sabbath, which affords an argument that this was the apostolic practice. Another argument may be drawn from this considera- tion that God in his providence has owned the first day of the week as the Sabbath, by peculiarly making it a blessing to thousands in their conversion, and comfort. — In addition to all this there seems a great propriety in a change. For the Sabbath was instituted on the seventh day, in commemoration of the completion of the work of creation; but the work of redemption, which was finished on the first day, when Christ arose from the dead, was a still greater work. Besides by observing the first day of the week we commemorate both the great works of crea- tion and redemption — of creation, by keeping one day in seven, and of redemption, by observing the first day of the week. We proceed to make a few observations on the IV. Point proposed, viz. when does the Sabbath be- gin ? On this question I shall say but little. Christians differ. We begin the Sabbath with the beginning of the civil day, or at midnight. A large and pious portion of the church in our own country begin it in the evening. The reason they give for this is, that the Jews began the vSabbath in the evening by divine direction. Thus we read. Lev. xxiii. 32. " from even unto even, shall ye cel- ebrate your Sabbath." But to this it is answered, that this law respected a ceremonial Sabbath, or the great day of atonement, which is here called a Sabbath. And although it is probable that the Jewish weekly Sabbath did begin in the evening, yet it is not entirely certain. The follow- ing passage has been quoted to prove that it did not. Mat. xxviii. 1. "In the end of the Snbbatb, as it besjan to dawn VOL. ir. 21 162 SERMON LXVIIL towards the first day of the week" — This text seems to intimate that the end of the Jewish Sabbath, and there- fore the beginning, w as not in the evening ; but towards the dawn. That the christian Sabbath ought to begin in the mor- ning rather than the evening, may be argued from the fol- lowing considerations. 1. It appears that the first day of the week at the time of our Saviour's resurrection, began in the morning. This appears from the passage just quoted. Mat. xxviii. 1. " In the end of the Sabbath as it began to dawn towards the first day of the week." And also John xx. 19. "the same day (that is the day on w hich Christ arose) at eve- ning being the first day of the week." From this text it appears that the evening after and not the evening before belonged to the first day. 2. Christ arose early in the morning, and not in the eve- ning, and therefore as we keep the first day of the week, in commemoration of his resurrection, there is a propri- ety in beginning the Sabbath in the morning. 3. There appears to be a peculiar fitness in beginning the Sabbath in the morning ; for by beginning it in the evening, we should either be obliged to lose the afternoon from worldly business, to prepare our minds ; or else rush at once from the world to the devotions of the Sab- bath. And our devotions would soon be interrupted by the nio-ht. And the follovvino; evening it would be lawful to engage in worldly avocations, which seems improper immediately after the holy exercises of the day. And es- pecially as but little business can be attended to, in the evening after the Sabbath ; many temptations are held out to visiting, and worldly conversation and amusements, which have a great tendency to destroy the seriousness, which may have been produced through the day. For these reasons the morning is preferable to the evening as the time to commence the Sabbath. And perhaps we may say that in keeping the Sabbath, it is proper to begin and end it at the same time that we begin and end the other days of the week. We ought to, keep one whole day in seven, and this ought to be the " first day in the reckoning. SERMON LXIX, THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. EXODUS XX. 8, 9, 10, 11. '* Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Six day a shalt thou labour and do all thy work ; but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God : in it thou shalt not do any ivork, thou, nor thy so?^ nor thy daughter, thy man servant, nor thy maid servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates : For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day : ivherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it^ . In the last discourse it was shown that the Sabbath wap instituted at the creation, that it is of moral and perpetual obligation, and that it has been changed from the seventh to the first day of the week ; some observations were made on the time when it begins. We proceed now to consider the duties required, and the sins forbidden in the iburth commandment. I. The duties required. " Questson 58. What is required in the fourth commaml- ment f The fourth corhmandment requircth the keeping holy to God such set times as he hath appointed in his ivord, expressly one whole day in seven to be a holy Sabbath to himself'' The inquiry arises here, whether under the New-Tes- tament dispensation, we are required to keep any set time as holy besides the Sabbath ? I answer No. Be- cause God alone has the right of instituting holy time.— • Under the Old Testament dispensation he did institute a number of holy days, which made a part of the ceremo- nial law, which was abrogated by the coming of Christ. But we read of no new days appointed in the New Tes- tament ; and therefore we are not bound to observe any. As to days of fasting and thanksgiving, they are occa- sionally proper. But no stated seasons or days are to be 164 .SEKMON LXIX. observed for these purposes ; because none are appoint- ed in the Scriptures. The Scriptures warrant us to set apart a season for special thanksgiving, when we have received special mercies, and a season for special fasting and humiliation when visited with special calamities. — We are therefore to judge when we are called to observe such days, by the aspects of divine providence. But ex- cept these occasional days which are to be pointed out by the aspects of divine providence, we are bound to keep no time as holy except one whole day in seven, which is the first day of the week, or the christian Sabbath. This includes not merely an artificial day, extending from the rising to the setting of the sun ; but a natural day of twen- ty four hours, or the one seventh part of a week. The manner in which this day is to be kept, we have stated in our Catechism in answer to the 60th question. " Hoiv is the Sabbath to be sanctified ? The Sabbath is to be sanctijied by an holy resting all that day^ even from such worldly employments and recreations as are lawful on other days, and spe?iding the icholc time in the public and private exercises of God's worship ; except so much as is to be taken up in the works of necessity and mercy. It is scarcely necessary to mention that the due sanc- tification of the Sabbath requires us to abstain from things at all times sinful. Breaking of God's command- ments is at all times forbidden ; but more especial- ly on the Sabbath day. Sin, always wrong, becomes aggravated by being committed on this day. But we are required on this day to abstain, not only from those things which are at all times sinful ; but also from those worldly employments and recreations, which are on other days lawful. 1. It is our duty to rest from worldly labour. This is explicitly enjoined in the fourth commandment " the se- venth day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God ; in it thou shalt not do any work." Every kind of secular business is to be rested irom on this day. To this general rule there are two exceptions, viz. works of necessity, and works of mercy. Works of ne- cessity are such as refreshing ourselves by food, taking care of beasts, defending ourselves against enemies, extin- o-uishing fires, and attendance of the sick by physicians. These and all other works of real necessity, are lawful ori THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 165 flic Sabbath day. For " the Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath." Mark ii. 27. Aiidour Sa- viour by his example sanctioned the peri'ormanceof works of necessity on the Sabbath dr.y. But it becomes ub to be careful that we do not take imaginary, for real ne- cessities, on this day, and thereby incur the displeasure of God. Works of mercy are also to be excepted ; such as sa- ving the life of a beast, visiting the sick, administering to the wants of the distressed, relieving the necessities of the poor, and such like works. For in reference to the Sabbath, our Saviour quoted this text, " I will have mer- cy and not sacrifice." Mat. xii. 7. And our Saviour fre- quently sanctioned the performance of works of mercy, by his own example. 2. It is our duty on this day to rest, not only from worldly labour, but also from those worldly recreations, which may be lawful on other days. It is not a day for worldly pleasures any more than worldly employments. Thus we read Is. Lviii. 13. " If thou turn away thy foot from the Sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure." Here we are required to refrain from do- ing and finding our own pleasure on the Sabbath day. 3. The rest of the Sabbath is not merely a cessation from worldly labour and recreations ; but it is a holy rest, in which we are to be actively engaged in the service of God. The command is, " remember the Sabbath day, to keep it liolyy And in other places we read, " the se- venth day is the Sabbath of rest, an holy convocation." Lev. xxiii. 3. "And call the Sabbath a delight the holy of the Lord, honourable, and shalt honour him." Is. Lviii. 13. It is our duty to " spend the whole time in the pub- lic and private exercises ofGod's worship, except so much as is to be taken up in the works of necessity and mer- cy." Preparation should be made the evening before, by a seasonable dispatch of our worldly business, and by endeavouring to compose our minds for the sacred duties of the day, and to get them into a devotional frame. Of this preparation for the Sabbatli we have an example in the pious Nehemiah. " And it came to pass, that wh'^n the gates of Jerusalem began io be dnrk, />"/() ?\c theSabbcfk^ I commanded that the gates shouW be shut, and charged 166 SERMON LXIX that they should not be opened till after the Sabbatli." — Preparation for the Sabbath the evening before is prac- tised by the most eminently pious christians ; and the benefits they receive from the practice afford an argu- ment in favour of the duty. And probably one reason why so many professing christians receive so little bene- fit from the Sabbath is a neglect, seasonably to dispatch worldly business, and duly to prepare for this holy day. — Hence instead of entering upon the day with a spiritual and lively frame of mind, they enter upon it with languor, and a worldly spirit. Through the Sabbath we ought to be in a holy frame of mind. Like John, we ought to be in the Spirit on the Lord's day." Rev. i. 10. God requires the heart in all our service. We are to keep the Sabbath holy ; but ex- ternal holiness w ill not be acceptable, without a corres- ponding holiness of heart. Having a holy frame of mind, the Sabbath is to be spent in the public, and private exer- cises of God's M'orship. It is our duty to attend, when we have opportunity, on the public worship of God's house. Thus the Sabbath is called " an holy convocation.'^'' Lev. xxiii. 3. That is a day of solemn assembling together for the worship of God. Isaiah prophesying of the latter day glory of the church, foretold, " and it shall come to pass, that, from one Sab- bath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the Lord." Is. Lxvi, 23. The example of our Sa- viour has also taught the duly; for we read, " and he came to Nazareth where he had been brought up; and as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day." Luk. iv. 16. When we are not employed in public worship, we ought to be engaged in family and private devotions ; such as reading the Scriptures, and other books on religious subjects, meditation on divine things, self-examination, prayer in our families and our closets, catechising and instructing those under our care, and the like. We proceed, II. To take a cursory view of the sins forbidden in the fourth commandment. Question 61. " The fourth commandment forhiddeih the omission or careless pej'forinance of the duties required^ and the profaning the day by idleness^ or doing that which is in itself sinfnl ; or by nnnccessary thoughts^ words^ or icorks, abont worhjly employments or recreations.'''' THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 167 ' 1. The Sabbath is broken, by omitting to perform the duties required. Wherever a duty is commanded, the omission of it is sin. Hence, they who neglect to attend upon public worship, except when necessarily prevented; and they who omit family and private devotion on this day are transgressors of the law respecting the Sabbath. 2. They who externally engage in the duties of the Sabbath but perform them in a careless manner, without a devotional frame of mind, are also transgressors of the fourth commandment. For, " God is a Spirit ; and they that worship him, must worship him in spirit and in truth." John iv. 24. x\nd thq Jews of old were severely reprov- ed, and threatened, because they drew near to the Lord with their mouth and honoured him with their lips, while their hearts were removed far from him. Is. xxix. 13. 3. The Sabbath is profaned by spending the day in idleness and sloth. Th0 Sabbath is a day of rest ; but it is a holy rest. It is a day of rest from labour ; but at the same time a resting in God, or in the performance of those duties of devotion, which are a delightful rest to the holy soul. The word Sabbath signifies rest. And we are told, " there remaineth a rest (or Sabbath) to the peo- ple of God," Heb. iv. 9. This rest or Sabbath remain- eth in heaven, which will be an eternal rest, or continual Sabbath. But the rest of heaven will not be enjoyed in idleness or sloth. On the contrary the saints there will continually be most actively engaged in the service ot God ; and will not cease day nor night, praising and ser- ving him. The Sabbath here below is a type of the hea- venly rest, and therefore is not to be spent in idleness and sloth. But, alas ! it is too often thus spent. Many make it a point to indulge themselves in sleeping much longer on this holy morning, than on any other. This practice is certainly a breach of this commandmpnt, and shows for- cibly, where the hearts of such persons are. When they are to engage in the business of the world, they can be up betimes ; but when they are called especially to en- gage in holy exercises, and this too but one day in seven, they will suffer a considerable portion of this small pro- portion of time to pass away, before they rise from their beds. And many of such persons, after they have risen, spend the greater part of the remainder of the day in idle- ness and sloth ; and the Sabbath is to them a weariness, 168 SERMON LXIX. saying with some of old, " what a weariness is it ?" Mai, i. 1 3. " When will the new moon be gone, that we may sell corn ? and the Sabbath, that we may set forth wheat?" Am. viii. 5. How can such persons reasonably expect to be admitted into the holy and active rest, which re- maineth for the people of God in heaven ? and how would they be happy there, where the Sabbath will never end ? 4. The Sabbath is broken by an indulgence in worldly thought and worldly conversation on this day. The law ofGod is spiritual and extends to the thoughts of the heart as well as to the external actions ; and what ever would be wrong if it were acted out, is also wrong in thought, and that it is wrong to indulge ourselves in world- ly conversation on the Sabbath, is evident from Is. Lviii. 13. where speaking our own words on this day is con- demned. Alas ! how often do even professing christians transgress by indulging themselves in worldly conversation on this day. 5. The Sabbath is grossly violated by following world- ly business on this day. Worldly labour is expressly pro- hibited in the commandment itself " The seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God, in it thou shalt not do amj ivork.^'' The same is taught in other passages of Scripture in which the pursuit of worldly business is con- demned ; as in Neh. xiii. 15. " In those days saw I in Judah some treading wine presses on the Sabbath, and bringing in sheaves, and lading asses : as also wine,grapes and figs, and all manner of burdens, which they brought ipto Jerusalem on the Sabbath day : and I testified a- gainst them in the day wherein they sold victuals. There dwelt men of Tyre also therein, which brought fish, and all manner of ware, and sold on the Sabbath unto the children of Judah, and in Jerusalem. Then I contended with the nobles of Judah, and said unto them, what evil thing is this that ye do, and profane the -abbath day ? Did not your fathers thus, and did not our God bring all this evil upon us, and upon this city? yet ye bring more] wrath upon Israel by profaning the Sabbath." ^o alsoi Jer xvii. 21,22 " Thus saith the Lord, take heed to your-j selves, and oear no burden on the Sabbath day, nor bring! it in by the gates of Jerusalem ; neither carry forth a' burden out of your houses on the Sabbath day, neither do THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 169 ye any work ; but hallow ye the Sabbath day, as I com- manded your fathers." Hence it is evident that any kind of worldly employment, except works of necessity and mercy, is a profanation of the Sabbath. Alas ! in this way, this day is doubtless much profa- ned. Some on this day especially in a busy season, pub- licly pursue their worldly occupations ; and others do it more privately. Travelling on business, wliere necessi- ty does not imperiously compel, sailing of vessels, except over public ferries when cases of necessary travelling oc- cur, and on open seas, the running of stages, driving mar- ket wagons, taking droves of cattle to market, working in factories of different kinds, selling and buying fish, meat, vegetables, or any thing else, preparing meat ibr the Monday market, posting books, writing letters of busi- ness, planning and arranging business to be executed on other days of the week — all these practices are flagrant breaches of the fourth commandment. A worldly spirit, disregarding the authority of God, may form excuses to justify these practices ; but they are, nevertheless contra- ry to both the spirit and the letter of the commandment ; and are in the sight of God profanations of the Sabbath, and provoke his wrath upon those who are guilty of them. 6. The Sabbath is violated by worldly recreations, e- ven those which are lawful on other days. Such are the too common practices of walking and riding out for recrea- tion, giving and receiving visits, and the like. That such practices are contrary to the spirit of the fourth command- ment, the sincere, and spiritual christian need scarcely be told. Fashionable and worldly professors of rehgion, who while they profess to believe the Scriptures, in fact are either strangers to them, or else explain away their strict and spiritual import, and are expecting heaven in some other way than the word of God warrants, may plead for such recreations as innocent ; but the word of God condemns them and spiritual christians will disap- ])rovc of them. The commandment is, " remember the Sabbatlidayto keep it holy." We certainly do not keep the day holy, when we ride or walk for our amusement or recreation ; or when we visit and engage in light or world- ly conversation. And the following text Is. jlviii. 13. is pointedly against such practices, '' If thou turn away thy foot from the Sabbat]], from doing ihy pleasure on my holy VOL. ir. 22 170 SERMON LXIX. day ; and call the Sabbath a dehght, the holy of the Lord, honourable ; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words." Here finding our own pleasure on the Sab- bath day is condemned ; and therefore riding and walk- ing out for pleasure, and paying social visits. And if any plead for these things, they act contrary to the word of God. Some, thoughtless and gay, impatient of the re- straints of the Sabbath, and bent on pleasure, may dis- regard these admonitions, and determine to pursue their worldly pleasures on the Lord's day. To such J w ould cite the words of the wisest of men, and spoken under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost. " Rejoice O young man in thy youth, and let thy heart cheer thee in the days of thy youth, and walk in the ways of thine heart, and in the sight of thine eyes; but know thou that for all these things God will bring thee into judgment." Eccl. xi 9. You will feel differently when death, which you now forget, summons you to appear at the bar of God, and when you come to stand before that God on whose authority you now trample, and whose commandments you refuse to obey. We have now taken a cursory view of the duties requi- red, and the sins forbidden in the fourth commandment. Before we conclude the subject, it will be important to remark, that it is the duty of heads of families, to see that the Sabbath is thus observed, externally, by all under their care. This is clearly evident from the words of the commandment itself, " thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, nor thy man servant, nor thy maid servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is with- in thy gates." Hence it is clearly the duty of heads of families to take care that their children and servants, and all under their charge, externally observe the Sabbath day. And they ought to enforce its observance upon them by their precepts, their example, and their authori- ty. This is a duty, which we have reason to fear is fre- quently neglected, and that much guilt is contracted in this way. Are there not some, who although they do not en- gage themselves, in secular business on the Sabbath day, yet permit or require those ^^ ho belong to them, or who are in their employ to labour on this day ? The masters or the employers, are in this case chargeable with the sin THE FOURTH COMM.VNDMENT, 171 of Sabbath breaking, as well as those who labour for them. — Yea, while the latter are by no means excusable, the former are the principals in the sin, and have a great weight of guilt resting upon their souls ; for they not only ruin tlieir own souls, but by their advice, or their authori- ty, and the temptation of gain which they hold out, are accessory to the eternal ruin of the souls of others. Again, are their not many, who suffer their children and servants and others under their care, to take their own pleasure on the Sabbath day ? and stroll about the streets, and fields, or go abroad on parties of pleasure, and oftentimes engage in conduct which would be wicked and disgrace* ful on any day. Such heads of families are partakers in these sins of those under their care ; and are with them chargeable with great guilt in the sight of God. In the conclusion of this discourse, be exhorted, my hearers, to compare yourselves with the law of God which we have been considering. Doubtless on the compari- son, we will all have reason to say, we have come short of our duty, and have transgressed. And perhaps some of you will be compelled to acknowledge, at the bar of your consciences that you have often been guilty of those more flagrant, and gross violations which have been point- ed out. By the law is the knowledge of sin. Let us in the glass of the law behold our sins, and be convinced of them ; let a sense of our sins drive us to Christ for par- don ; and let us be more careful in future to remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Many and weighty motives urge to a strict observance of this commandment. Such as the goodness of God in allowing us such a large portion of time for our own employments; his claiming the Sabbath as his own, and enforcing our observance of it by his authority ; his own example; the blessing he has put upon it, making it a blessing to nations, and to individ- uals, both in a temporal and spiritual respect, when it is duly observed ; and the civil consequences, of transgres- sing this commandment, both to individuals and the com- munity. But these reasons shall be the subject of anoth- er discourse.— SERMON LXX. THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. EXODUS XX. 8, 9, 10, 11. ''''Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work ; but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God : in it thou shaltnot do any ivork, ihoUi, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man servant,nor thy maid servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates : For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea and all that inthemis^ and rested the seventh day : wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.'''' In the preceding discourse were pointed out, the man- ner, in which the Sabbath is to be sanctified, and what acts are a breach of the law respecting this institution. — It was then shown that it is our duty to rest from all se- cular business, and worldly recreations ; and to spend the whole time in the public and private exercises of God's worship, except so much of it as is to be taken up in the works of necessity and mercy And it was also shown how this commandment is broken ; viz. by the omission or careless performance of the duties required, by spending the day in idleness, by worldly thoughts and conversation, by following our worldly business, whether in public or secret, and by worldly recreations. It remains now to endeavour to enforce the observance of the Sab- bath. The reasons which will be urged are contained in the commandment itself in these words. " Six days shaltthou labour and do all thy work ; but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God — For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day ; wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day." Or as they are stated in our Cate- chism in answer to the 62d question. " What are the reasons annexed to the fourth command' ment ? THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 173 The reasons annexed to the fourth commandment are God''s allowing us six days of the iveek for our own employment, his challenging a special propriety in the sevenths, his own example, and his blessing the Sabbath dayP According to this answer, the reasons annexed to the fourth commandment to enforce obedience to it are four viz. I. God's allowing us six days of the week for our own employments. II. His challenging a special propriety in the seventh, as peculiarly his own. III. His own example. IV. His blessing the Sabbath day. To these reasons your attention is invited in the ensu- ing discourse. I. The first reason why we should observe the Sabbath day is that God has allowed us six days of the week for our own employments. " Six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work." God has an indubitable right to all our time, and therefore certainly has a right to dispose of it as he pleases. But he has given us a large portion, in which to pursue our worldly business, and has reserved a small portion, only the one seventh part, to be specially and exclusively devoted to his immediate service. He has therefore been very kind to us, and it is highly equi- table that we should devote to him that small proportion which he has reserved for himself And it is certainly very unreasonable, that where God, who has a right to all our time, has given us six days out of seven for our • own employments, we should encroach upon the seventh, and take this also. II. The second reason given is God's challenging a special propriety in the seventh day as peculiarly his own. " The seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God." In these words God asserts his authority over us, and right to appoint a Sabbath, and lays a peculiar claim to this day as his property ; and it is sacrilege or robbery ofGod, to devote this day to our own worldly purposes, or to spend it in a way different from what God has com- manded us to do. HI. The duty of observing the Sabbath is enforced by the example of God. " In six days the Lord made hea- ven and earth, the sea and all that in them is, and rested 174 SERMON LXX. the seventh day." The ways of the Lord are perfect, and therefore his example, as far as it is imitable, ought to be followed by us ; and we ought to be diligent in our re- spective lawful callings six days of the week, and on the seventh we ought to rest from our worldly employments, and spend it in the duties of devotion. IV. The last reason given for the observance of the Sabbath day is that God has blessed it. " Wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day." By the Lord's blessing the Sabbath day, we are to understand, that he hath put his blessing upon it, and makes it a blessing especially to those who keep it aright. And if there is a blessing con- nected with the observance of this day, it is implied that a curse is connected with the breach or neglect of it. It has been and still is a great blessing both in a tem- poral and spiritual respect ; and the breach of it has been and still is followed with present loss and eternal ruin. That the Sabbath is a blessing appears from the decla- ration of our Saviour, Mark, ii. 27. " The Sabbath was made for man" — that is, it was made for the good of man. The same appears from several texts of Scripture in which promises are made to the observance of this day. In Lev. xxvi. we read that the Lord having com- manded the IsraeHtes to keep his Sabbaths, made ma- ny precious promises to them in case of their obedience ; such as rain in due season, plenty in all their borders, vic- tory over their enemies, peace, religious privileges, and the presence and favour of God. We have also several promises both of a temporal and spiritual nature, made to obedience to this commandment, in the following text. — Is. Lvi. 4. 7. " Thus saith the Lord unto the eunuchs that keep my Sabbaths. Even unto them will I give in mine house, and within my walls, a place and a name bet- ter than of sons and of daughters : I will give them an ev- erlasting name that shall not be cut off! Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the Lord, to serve him, and to love the name of the Lord, to be his servants, every one that keepeth the Sabbath from polluting it — Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make themjoyful in my house of prayer : their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be accepted upon mine altar." Is. Lviii. 13. 14. '• If thou turn away thy foot from the THE FOURTH COMMANDMEMT. 175 Sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the Sabbath a delight, the holy of the Lord, honoura- ble ; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words: Then shalt thou delight thyself in the Lord ; and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father." And just before the Babylonish captivity, when the Jews had be- come exceedingly degenerate, the prophet Jeremiah, while he was denouncing the heavy judgments of God a- gainst them, was commissioned to say to them Jer. xvii- 24, 26. '• And it shall come to pass, if ye diligently heark- en unto me saith Lord, to bring in no burden through the gates of this city on the Sabbath day, but hallow the Sab- bath day, to do no work therein ; then shall there enter in- to the gates of this city kings and princes sitting upon the throne of David, riding in chariots, and on horses, they and their princes, the men of Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem ; and this city shall remain forever." All these promises which have been quoted teach us that the Sabbath is a great blessing, and that in observing it, there is great reward. The same is taught also by the threatenings denoun- ced against the transgressoi's of this commandment. A- mong the Israehtes the Lord directed that the Sabbath- breaker should be put to death. And we have an in- stance Numb. XV. 32. &;c. where this law was by the ex- press direction of God executed. In Lev. xxvi. the Lord threatened the Israelites, if they did not keep his Sab- bath, with numerous and terrible judgments, such as sickness, drought, wild beasts, war, pestilence, and fa- mine ; and if they would not reform under all these judg- ments, that then their cities should be laid wase, their tianctuaries and their land be dessolated, and they be scattered among the Heathen. And Jer. xvii. 27. he threatened them, " if ye will not hearken unto me to hal- low the Sabbath day, and not to bear a burden, even en- tering iii at the gates of Jerusalem on the Sabbath day ; then will I kindle a fire in the gates thereof, and it shall devour the palaces of Jerusalem, and it shall not be quenched." These threatenings hold up a warning to Sabbath-breakers, and shew that they not only lose tlie blessing promised to those who observe this day ; but al- so bring positive misery upon themselves. 176 SERMON LXX The advantages of the Sabbath, and that therefore it is a blessing may be proved by several other.considerations. We shall consider its advantages to individuals, both in a temporal and spiritual respect, and then show that it is also a blessing to the community at large. 1. The institution of the Sabbath is a great blessing to individuals in a temporal respect. The constitution of man is such that a day of rest from bodily labour and employment is necessary to refresh and invigorate it ; and especially have servants who are doomed to constant la- bour a necessity of such a day of rest. And we find Deut. V. 15. this given as a reason for the observance of the Sabbath, " that thy man-servant and thy maid-servant may rest as well as thou." In this way the Sabbath, by that rest which it affords from bodily labour, promotes a man's temporal happiness ; and by guarding his health, and the vigour of his constitution is calculated eventually to advance his estate. Again, that an observance of the Sabbath is calcula- ted to advance a man's estate is proved from this consid- eration— Sabbath-breaking greatly tends to harden the heart and lessen and destroy the fear of God, and thus proves an inlet to many other vices which retard the ac- quisition of property, and oftentimes greatly injure it. — Further, where the head of a family by his example, or connivance, or authority, causes those under his care to break the Sabbath, they will be much less likely to be faithful to his interest, than if they paid a conscientious regard to this day, and attended upon its instructions. — For its instructions are calculated to repress vicious in- clinations, and strengthen virtuous resolutions, and pro- mote a conscientious regard to duty. And the servant who has no fear of God before his eyes, and who can without hesitation rob God, will not be as likely to be faithful to his master's interests as one who is actuated by regard to the authority of God. Thus the obser- vance of the Sabbath will be likely to make those un der our care, or in our employ, more faithful to our inter- ests and thus promote our temporal advantage. In further confirmation of the position that a man's tem- poral interestis best promoted by an observance of the Sabbath, let us recur to facts. Go to our jails, and in- quire into the history of those there confined for crimes, THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 177 and who by their crimes have ruined their families, and I beheveyou will almost universally find that they were Sabbath-breakers. Yea I believe that generally, you will find, that that course of wickedness which has led to the penitentiary and the gallows, commenced in Sabbath- breaking. " Many malefactors, (says an eminent* writer on the Sabbath) at their last hour have acknowledged that Sabbath-breaking was their leading sin, and the oc- casion of all the rest of their wicked courses." Another tauthor remarks, " that he doth not know that ever he observed any repentance in a malefactor who did not bit- terly lament his neglect of his duty to God on that day." Go again into places where the Sabbath is generally dis- regarded, and contrast the temporal prosperity of the peo- ple, with that of those who live where the Sabbath is carefully observed ; and which will you find most flour- ishing ? I feel no hesitation in saying that I believe the comparison will be in favour of the places where the Sabbath is observed. — These facts all undeniably prove that a man's temporal interest, is best advanced by a careful observance of the Sabbath day. The same is further forcibly established, by this con- sideration, that we are dependent on the Providence of God to prosper our exertions to obtain wealth. And can we reasonably expect his blessing, when in direct oppo- sition to his command clearly made known unto us, we take his time to advance our object ? I believe that Pro- vidence often signally blasts the exertions of those who make encroachments on his day. Numerous instances in confirmation of this remark might be adduced both from history and from our own acquaintance with the world. — The judgments of God have been signally pointed against this ■ sin ; and by one stroke of heaven, the Sabbath- breaker has often lost more, than all the gains of the Sab- bath ; and the Lord has taken away his unlawful gain, or that which he got by robbing him of his time, if I may so speak, with heavy interest. Yea oftentimes he has sum- moned the sinner to his bar, in the very act of breaking the Sabbath. A very large proportion of those fatal ac- cidents of which we weekly hear, 1 believe takes place on the Sabbath day ; and the subjects of them are Sabbath- •VVillison. fTurner. n. VOL. 2.3 J7iJ SERMON LXX. breakers. Hereby God is constantly holding up a warn* ing against this sin. But alas ! One of the crying sins of mankind is, they discern not the operations of the di- vine hand. But supposing we do not see in every case immediate marks of the divine displeasure, blasting the ef- forts of the Sabbath-breaker, yet in these cases I believe he often does, though insensibly, so withhold his blessing as to prevent his prosperity. And I exceedingly doubt my brethren, whether a man ever advanced his temporal interest, by taking the Lord's time in which to do it. And if any do appear to prosper in this course, I hesitate not to say their prosperity is cursed, and they are heaping trea- sure together for the last days. And here permit me to subjoin a quotation from the writings of that eminent ci- vilian. Sir Matthew Hale lord chief justice of the king's bench, England. " I have found (said he) by a strict and diligent observation, that a due observing the duty of the Lord's day, hath ever had joined to it a blessing upon the rest of my time ; and the week that hath been so begun, hath been blessed and prosperous to me : And, on the other side, when I have been negligent of the duties of this day, the rest of the week hath been unsuccessful and unhappy to my secular employments. And this I do not write lightly or inconsideiately, but upon a long and sound observation and experience." Again in another place he saith, " 1 thank God, I ever found that in the strictest observations of the times of his worship, J ever met with the best advantage to my worldly occasions ; and that whenever my worldly occasions encroached upon those times, I met with disappointment, though in things of the most probable success. It hath been and ever shall be to me, a conviction beyond all argument, and demonstration whatsoever, that God expects the ob- servation of his times. It would be a sad presage unto me, of the severe anger of my Maker, if my inadvertence should cast me upon a temporal undertaking upon this day, and that it should prosper." From all the preced- ing remarks we confidently conclude that the Sabbath is a temporal blessing to individuals. 2. We proceed next to show that it is a spiritual bles- sing. Admitting that man has an immortal soul, that he is destined for another and eternal state of existence, and that he must possess the religion of the Scriptures to be THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 179 m favour with God, and secure his future happiness, then the Sabbath is a great spiritual blessing ; for it is signally calculated to promote his spiritual and eternal interests. It peculiarly calls his attention every seventh day to the care of his soul, and to preparation for eternity. If it were not for the Sabbath many could find no time for gaining a knowledge of these important concerns ; and most of those who have time, would not take it. We know even among us, notwithstanding all the seriousness which is excited in our minds on the Sabbath, the busi- ness and amusements of the world frequently, in the short period of a week, almost eradicate all that we have gained on the Sabbath. What then would be the case if we had no Sabbath ? The proneness of man to forget God and ne- glect eternity, is so great, that we have reason to believe religion would be banished from the earth. The Sabbath is the grand palladium of religion, and this the enemies of piety well know ; and never was a more promising ef^ Ibrt made to destroy religion, than that not long since made by a European nation to blot out the memory of the Sabbath, by converting the week into a decade. Thou- sands of souls now on earth and ten thousand times ten thousand, who surround the throne in heaven can from experience bear testimony to the importance of the Sab- bath in promoting the spiritual and eternal interests of the soul, and therefore that it is a great spiritual blessing. 3. The Sabbath has been and still is a blessing to the community at large, and Sabbath breaking has injured and ruined nations. It is certain that religion is necessary to the well being of civil society. This is acknowledged e- ven by infidel politicians. But as has just been shown the institution of the Sabbath is of the highest importance to religion. The conclusion necessarily follows, that the ob- servance of the Sabbath is of high importance to the well- being of civil society. Again it is certain that the fear of a Supreme Being is of the utmost importance, and abso- lutely necessary to the well-being, if not the very exis- tence of civil society. This has a powerful influence to restrain from those secret crimes, which might be per- petrated, and which would much disturb, if not destroy civil society. But of the important influence of the Sab- bath to promote the fear of God, there can be no reason- able doubt. Hence we again draw the conclusion that 180 SERMON LXX the Sabbath is a great blessing to civil society. This is true under every form of government ; but more especial- ly under a republican form, such as ours. To the well-be- ing of this form of government, virtue in the people is more especially necessary. Virtue is allowed by the wis- est politicians to be the very spring of a republican gov- ernment. Reason and the example of republics which have existed in the world both teach us that when a general corruption of manners takes place, a republi- can government cannot continue to exist. Hence, as the Sabbath has a most important influence on the preserva- tion and promotion of virtue among a people ; its ohser- vance is of peculiar importance to a republic, and there- fore to our country. This is the leading principle on which legislators have enacted laws to enforce the observance of the Sabbath. — It is of importance to the interests of society. And here it may be proper to remark that we have an additional reason why we should observe the Sabbath, or at least ab- stain from the external breaches of it, in this consideration, the laws of our State require it ; and if we respect the laws framed by men of our ow n choice, and would main- tain the character of good citizens, we are bound to obey. Further the word and^providence of God teach us that the observance of the Sabbath is of advantage to the com- munity. Many promises as we have already seen were made to the nation of Israel in case they observed this in- stitution, and many judgments were denounced against them in case they disregarded it. And these promises and threatenings were fulfilled. While the nation gene- rally kept the Sabbath they prospered ; but w hen they did not they were brought into affliction. And Sabbath- breaking was a leading sin which provoked God to send from time to time his heav^y judgments upon them ; and this was especially the sin for which their land was deso- lated, and its inhabitants carried captive into Chaldea. — Thus we read Ez. xx. 13, 15, 16. " The house of Israel rel idled against me in the wilderness — my Sabbaths they greatly polluted : then I said, I would pour out my fury upon them in the wilderness to consume them. I lifted up my hand unto them in the wilderness, that I would not bring them into the land which I had given them ; be- THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 181 cause they polluted my Sabbaths." From this passnge we learn that Sabbath-breaking was a leading cause of the judgments which the Israelites sufflu'ed in the wilderness. And that this was one principal procuring cause of the heavy calamities which they suffered from the Chrddeans, appears from the following texts, Ez. xxii. 8, 13. 15 — *• Thou hast despised mine holy things, and hast profaned my Sabbaths. Behold therefore I will scatter thee among the Heathen, and disperse thee in the countries, and will consume thy filthiness out of thee." 2 Chron. xxxvl. 21. the historian having given an account of the destruction of Jerusalem, and the captivity of the Jews by the Chal- deans, adds, " to fulfil the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah, until the land had enjoyed her Sab- baths : for as long as she lay desolate she kept Sabbath to fulfil three score and ten years." And also, Neh. xiii. 17, 18* " Then I contended with the nobles of Judah, and said unto them, what evil thing is this that ye do, and pro- fane the Sabbath day ?" Did not your fathers thus, and did not our God bring all this evil upon us, and upon this city ? yet ye bring more wrath upon Israel, by profa- ning the Sabbath." In these judgments whirh came up- on Israel, all nations who live under the light of revelation have a warning against this sin. And since the law re- specting the Sabbath is still in force, we have reason to believe that when nations now generally neglect and trans- gress the Sabbath they will be visited with thedivine judg- ments. And we have every reason to believe that Sab- bath-breaking has been one principal cause of the awful judgments which the nations have in modern times experi- enced. We shall now close this subject with a few reflec- tions. From what has been said, it is evident the Sabbath is a benevolent institution, and was appointed by the benevo- lent Creator for the good of man. It is calculated to pro- mote the interests of society, and advance the temporal, spiritual, and eternal happiness of individuals. We ought therefore highly to prize it, be thankful to God for it, and carefully observe it and see that it is observed by all un- der our care. Many of you my hearers I believe do esteem this day, a delight, the holy of the Lord, and honourable ; and do 182 SERMON LXX. observe and are thankful for it. But are there not some here and multitudes in our land, who pay little or no re- gard to this day, but hve in the habitual and open neglect and violation of its duties ? Such are injuring themselves in this world, and are ruining their souls forever. And the evil does not terminate with themselves ; if it did, it would, though great, be comparatively less. But by their authority, influence, and example, they are leading oth- ers into the same sin and ruin. They are greatly injuring the cause of religion ; they are poisoning the pub- lic morals ; they are provoking the judgments of God upon our country ; and are doing much to destroy our religious and civil institutions, and to banish religion, virtue, and civil liberty from our land. And are not such persons highly criminal .'^ And \nhei/ are criminal, what must we think of those who go still further, and trampling on human and divine authority, and setting at defiance the laws of their country, and the laws of God not only break the Sabbath, but oppose every attempt at reforma- tion in this respect ? Surely the judgments of Heaven will sooner or later overtake these persons. And we have reason to fear will also fall upon a land, where such a spirit prevails. If it were not for the despised remnant, who respect the institution of the Sabbath, and w ho are endeavour- ing, by their prayers, their example, their influence, and their exertions, to stem the torrent of vice and avert the judgments of heaven, our land would doubtless soon ex- perience the desolating judgments of a sin-hating God. — Let those who respect and love the Sabbath, use all law- ful and practicable exertions to maintain it. It is the grand palladium of our inestimable rehgious and civil in- stitutions. If the former be destroyed, the latter must go with it. But my hearers God will not suffer it to be de- stroyed. He has maintained it in all ages, and he will slill maintain it, against the joint attempts of wicked men and devils. Yea we have reason to believe the time is near at hand, when he will either convert the enemies of the Sabbath into friends, or destroy them. For the time will come, and we hope it is nigh, when according to pro- phecy, " from one Sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before ttie Lord." Is. lxvi. 23. The next verse teaches us what will then have become of Sab- THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. • 183 bath-breakers. " x\nd they (tliat is all flesh who keep the Sabbath and come to worship before the Lord) shall go forth, and look upon the carcases of the men that have transgressed against me ; for their worm shall not die, neither shall their tire be quenched; and they shall be an abhorring unto all flesh. And now let me earnestly exhort those who have been in the habit of violating the Sabbath, to break off from this sin and " remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Consider attentively the reasons which have been offer- ed, and let them have their due weight upon your minds. If you have any regard to the principles of equity, ob- serve the Sabbath, for God has given you six days out of seven. Ought you not then to devote the seventh to his service.'^ If you have any regard to theauthority of God, by whom you must soon be judged, keep the Sabbath, for it is his command. If you have any respect to his exam- ple, rest on the Sabbath, for he has set you this example. And if you have any regard to his blessing, keep the Sabbath, for he has blessed it, and appointed it to be a blessing. Would you prosper in your temporal pursuits ? Would you avoid the blasts of heaven on your pursuits and possessions ? Would you not have your very blessings cursed ? Would you leave an inheritance to your children without the curse of God entailed upon it? Keep the Sabbath and see that it is observed by all under your care. Do you love your country ? Have you any regard to its welfare ? Would you promote its happiness, and prevent its ruin ? Have you any respect to the laws of your country ; and would you maintain a just claim to the character of good citizens ? Cease to violate the Sabbath. And above all would you avoid eternal perdition ? Would you not destroy your souls forever ? And be instrumental in the de- struction of the souls of others ? Then cease from the sin of Sabbath-breaking, and remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. My hearers, the truth of God is be- fore you, — enforced by numerous and solemn considera- tions. If Sabbath-breakers are determined to go on, I am clear of your blood, I have warned you. Remember you act contrary to light, and I have no doubt contrary to your consciences. It is at your peril. And in the presence of God, I solemnly tell you in his name, his wrath will abide upon you. SERMON LXXI. THE FIFTH COMMANDMENT. i/ DUTIES OF CHILDREN TO PARENTS. EXODUS XX. 12. " Honour thy father and thy mother^ that thy days may he long upon the land which the Lord thy Godgiveih thee.'''' The moral law, summarily comprehended in the ten commandments, was written with the finger of God, on two tables of stone. The first table had written on it the first four commandments, containing our duty to God; and the second table had written on it the last six com- mandments, which contain our duty to man. We have attended to the duties of the first table, and come now in course to treat of those of the second. The fifth commandment, respects not only the duties which arise out of the relation of parents and children, in their proper sense ; but also relative duties generally. By father and mother in this commandment, we are to understand all superiors in age, gifts, and authority ; and consequently by those who are commanded to honour their father and mother, we are to understand not only children, but also all inferiors in age, gifts, and station. In this sense the authors of our catechism, and commen- tators generally have understood this commandment ; and this explanation is warranted by the Scriptures. Thus superiors in age are sometimes called fathers and moth- ers, as L Tim. v. 1, 2. " Rebuke not an elder, but en- treat him as r father ; the elder women as mothers.'''' Su- periors in gifts are also styled fathers : Gen. '\y. 20, 21 ; "Jabal was the father o^ such as dwell in tents, and of tjuch as have cattle. And Jubal was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ." Great men are some- times CdWed fathers as was Naaman the Syrian by his ser- vants ; II Kings V. 13. Men of honour and usefulness in THE FIFTH COMMANDMENT. 185 the church are also sometimes so called. Thus Elisha called Elijah, father, II. Kings ii. 12 ; and Joash king of Israel called Ehsha father, II. Kings xiii. 14. And good kings and queens are sometimes called fathers and mo- thers, as Is. xlix. 23. " And kings shall be thy nursing fathers and their queens thy nursing mothers.^'' From these and many other texts, we are warranted to explain the fifth commandment of the relations of life generally. Considered in this sense, it will include not only the du- ties and sins of parents and children ; but also of hus- bands and wives, masters and servants, rulers and ruled, and ministers and people. To each of these relations we shall attend in their order. The first relation which claims our attention is that of parents and children. The fifth commandment is partic- ularly addressed to children, and especially points out their duties ; but the corresponding duties of parents are evidently implied. We begin with the duties of children towards their parents. To point out and enforce these duties is the object of the ensuing discourse. I. What are the duties which children owe to parents } These duties are expressed in the commandment by the word honour^ which must be taken in an extensive latitude, as comprising the whole duty of children to- wards their parents. " Honour thy father and thy moth- er" signifies the same thing as be dutiful to them. 1 . It is the duty of children to love their parents. While children, next to God, they ought to love their parents. Love is one principle from which all their other duties ought to be performed. 2. They ought to respect them. This is taught by the letter of the commandment itself, " honour thy father and thy mother." And we read, Mai. i. 6. " A son honoureth his father" — we ought to think and speak respectfully of them. And on the contrary we ought not to think con- temptuously of tliem ; we ought never to speak disre- spectfully of them, or speak in an impudent or unbecom- ing manner to them, as some wicked children do ; and wc ought never to conduct towards them disrespectfully, or by our conduct in life dishonour them. If they have failings, still they are our parents ; and their failings will not warrant disrespect or contempt on one part as chil- VOL. If, 24 186 SERMON LXXI. dren. The wickedness of such conduct is clearly taught in the following passages of Scripture — Deut, xxvii. 16. "Cursed be he that setteth light by his father or his moth- er ; and all the people shall say, amen." Prov. xx. 20. Whoso curseth his father or his mother, his lamp shall be put out in obscure darkness." And Ham was highly cen- sured for his disrespect to his father Noah, though the father had acted in a very unbecoming manner. 3. Children ought to render a ready obedience to all the lawful commands of their parents. They ought to study to please them ; and when they know their will, be ready to fulfil it, without delay. They ought to obey, not from a principle of slavish fear, or because they are afraid of cor- rection if they do not ; but from a sense of duly, and out of Jove to their parents ; and they ought to obey all their commands, with a single exception ; for the command of God is, " children obey your parents in all things." Col. iii. 20. The exception alluded to is this, when parents com- mand children to commit sin. For the command of God is, "children obey your parents in the Lord ; Eph. vi. 1. Parents have a right to command their children ; but this right does not authorize them to command their children to break God's laws, or require children to obey such commands. The authority of God is paramount to all other; and where the parents commands contradict those of God, children are to obey God rather than their pa- rents. For Christ hath said, Mat. x. 37 ; " He that lov- eth father or mother more than me, is not worthy of me." When therefore parents impose commands upon children to do things forbidden by the law of God, such as to swear, lie, defraud, break the Sabbath, and the like, chil- dren are not under obligations to obey such commands. Nay, it is at the peril of incurring God's wrath if they do. But in all other cases, children are bound to obedience. 4. It is the duty of children to /ieam^ew to the instructions of thei/" parents, when these instructions, are not sinful. Thus Solomon exhorted, " hear ye children, the instruc- tion of a father, and attend to know understanding." Prov. iv. 1. It is an important duty incumbent on parents to instruct their children, in the knowledge of the common affairs of life, and especially in the things of religion. And children ought to have a teachable disposition, and DUTIES OP CHILDREN TO PARENTS. 187 willingly, and with pleasure, and thankfulness, listen to, and receive the instructions of their parents. 5. Children ought patiently to submit to correction frbra their parents, and profit by it. Correction is a painful duty ; but it is an important one, and oftentimes necessa- ij for your good. God has enjoined it upon parents. Thus we read, Prov. xiii. 24. " He that spareth his rod hateth his son : but he that loveth him chasteneth him be- times. Prov. xix. 28; "Chasten thy son while there is hope, and let not thy soul spare for his crying." Prov. xxiii. 13, 14 ; Withhold not correction from the child : for if thou beatest him with the rod he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell." And Prov. xxix. 15, 17; "The rod and re- proof give wisdom : but a child left to himself bringeth his mother to shame. Correct thy son, and he shall give thee rest : yea, he shall give delight unto thy soul." From these texts, children, you see, that God commands parents to correct you, when necessary, for your faults ; /End when other means fail to restrain you, if they spare the rod, even though they do it out of tenderness to you, it is a mistaken and criminal tenderness, and God de- clares they hate you. It is the duty of parents to correct their children for their faults, when advice and admoni- tion fail to restrain them ; and it is the duty of children to receive their corrections with patience and submission ; and instead of being petulant, and obstinate, and feeling anger towards their parents, when corrected, to be sorry for their faults, which has rendered correction necessary, and to resolve to do so no more. 6. Once more. It is the duty of children, to bear with the infirmities of their parents, when they become old ; and then especially to be kind to them and endeavour to comfort them ; and if parents have become poor or help- less, it is the bounden duty of children according to their abihty to assist them. It is recorded to the honour of Jo- seph that he nourished his aged father ; Gen. xlvii 12. And the command of God is, "despise not thy mother, when she is old ;" Prov. xxiii. 22. That child nmst want natural affection, and be a monster in human form, who has wherewith to support and comfort parents in their old age or infirmity, and can see them in want and dis- tress, and not administer the needed support and conso* iU8 SERMON LXXI. lation. And I may add further, that the curse of God will rest upon such children. Thus I have pointed out the duties of children to their parents. Before we leave this head it will be proper to inquire, how long are the duties which have been pointed out, binding on children ? Some of them, such as love, re- spect, and care, and assistance when necessary, are bind- ing as long as the parents live. But the parental author- ity, at least in a great degree ceases, when the child comes to mature age and begins to act for itself in the world. Until this period, while the child continues un- der the parents care and subject to his direction and controul, it is his duty to obey, but after this period the strict obligation to obedience ceases ; and though the child is bound to love and honour his parents, and re- spect their advice, yet perhaps we may safely say, pa- rents have no right to impose commands, or go any fur- ther than to give advice. II. We proceed to enforce the duty which children owe to parents. 1. The duties which we have pointed out are highly reasonable. When we consider that parents were the in- struments of their being ; when we consider the helpless state of the child in infancy, and its dependent state in childhood and youth ; when we consider what parents have borne for their children ; when we reflect on the great care necessary in infancy ; and oftentimes the sleepless nights they have spent, and in time of sickness the painful watchings they have endured, and the dread- ful anxiety they have felt, lest they should die and not live ; when we consider the care, anxiety, and trouble which children give parents during the whole period of their tender years, the expense of their support and edu- cation, and their exertions to render them comfortable and respectable in life, and even after the parents them- selves are gone — ^when we consider all these things, must we not without hesitation subscribe to the reasonable- ness of the duty in all the extent in which it has been ex- plained, " Honour thy father, and thy mother ?" The duty of children to parents is founded in the nature of things. Reason teaches us it is right, that children should love, respect, and obey their parents, hearken to their instructions, submit to their corrections, and when DUTIES OF CHILDREN TO PARENTS. 189 ihey are old, bear with their infirmities, and if necessary, exert themselves to give them a comfortable maintenance. My young friends let me exhort you seriously to reflect on this subject. Think what your parents have endured for you, of the months they nursed you in your helpless infancy, of their anxiety for you during the thoughtless years of childhood, and of the anxiety they still feel du- ring the period of giddy youth. Some of you have per- haps often been sick even before the time of which you now have any recollection. Think of the attention you then received from your parents, of the anxious days and the sleepless nights they then spent, of the achings of heart which they then endured, while your life hung in suspense ; and perhaps under God, you owe it to their unremitted care and attention that you are now alive and in health. And can you now refuse them love, respect, and obedience } Can you now do an action which would give them a moment's pain } Much less, can you by your conduct give them more anxiety and pain than your helpless infancy occasioned } Can you by your disobedience, rend the hearts of your parents } Espe- cially can you renew with increased acuteness the pangs of the mother that bare you ^ Is that mother pious ? And is she travailing in birth for your soul until Christ be formed within you } And do you turn a deaf ear to her pi- ous counsels and reproofs } Ah ! cruel youth ! you are acting contrary to every principle of reason, and every dictate of nature. Cease from your disobedience, and cruelty ; and be persuaded by all that your parents have done and endured and are still doing, to do your duty to them. 2. This duty is enforced by the precepts of the word of God. The command in our text is positive, "honour thy father, and thy mother." Similar to this are several oth- er passages of Scripture, such as the following. Lev. xix. 3. " Ye shall fear, every man, his mother and his father." Prov. iv. 1. '• Hear ye children, the instruction of a fa- ther, and attend to know understanding." Prov. i. 8. " My son hear the instruction of thy father, and forsake not the law of thy mother." Prov. vi. 20. " My son, keep thy fathers commandment, and forsake not the law of thy mother." Prov. xxiii. 22. ''Hearken unto thy father that begat thee, and despise not thy mother when she is 190 SERMON LXXL old." Eph. vi. 1. " Children obey your parents in the Lord : for this is right." And Col, iii. 20. " Children o- bey your parents in all things." Such are the commands of God, in his word on this subject. Children and youth, do you regard the authority of the great God, who has the right of authority over you, in whose hands you are, and to whom you must one day give an account ? then honour your father and mother ; for this is his command. 3. This duty is enforced by the promises which God hath made to the obedient. He has declared filial obedi- ence to be well-pleasing to him, Col. iii. 20. " Children, obey your parents in all things : for this is well-pleasing unto the Lord." And when he gave the commandment on Sinai, he annexed a promise to it. " Honour thy father, and thy mother, that thi/ days may be loiig upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee." In the repetition of this commandment, Deut. v. 16. the promise is expressed a little more full. " Honour thy father and thymother, as the Lord thy God commanded thee, that thy days may be prolonged ; and that it may go well with thee in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee." This commandment is quoted, with a little variation in the promise, by the Apostle Eph. vi. 2, 3. " Honour thy father and mother, which is the first commandment with promise, that it may be well with thee, and that thou mayest hve long on the earth." Hence we learn that God is well pleased with filial obedience, and that he has promised temporal bles- sings to obedient children. This promise was not made exclusively to the Jews ; for the ten commandments were intended for all ages of the world ; and the Apostle quotes the promise to enforce filial obedience on the children of christians. The import and force of this promise are well explained in our Catechism. " The reason annexed to theffth commandment is a promise of long life and prosperity, as far as it shall serve for God's glo- ry, and their own good, to all such as keep this commandment. ''' This is a promise of a long and prosperous life to obe- dient children. This was probably more frequently ful- filled, in the letter of it, under the Old Testament than now. The promise is probably more frequently fulfilled now by spiritual blessings. But still I believe it is often literally fulfilled, of which we may be convinced by care- fully observing the dealings of divine providence, towards DUTIES OP CHILDREN TO PARENTS. 191 those who have faithfully discharged their duty towards their parents. There is no duty which God appears more si2;nally to follow with temporal prosperity than this. — Would you then, my young friends, have the blessing of heaven to crown your days with temporal prosperity, hon- our your parents.. 4. God has in the strongest manner expressed his ab- horrence of disobedience in children, and pronounced dread- ful woes against them. In that dreadful catalogue of the sins of the Gentile world which is recorded in the first chapter of the epistle to the Romans, disobedience to parents is mentioned, and classed with the enormous sins of murder, hating God, covenant-breaking, and want of na- tural affection. And the same Apostle in his epistle to Timothy, speaking of the perilous times that should come in the last days, gives as the reason, that men would be great sinners ; and he enumerates a catalogue of most a- trocious sinners and classes among them the disobedient to parents. These passages show that this is a heinous sin. And if we look through the Scriptures we shall find many threatenings denounced against the transgressors of this commandment. In the Jewish law, God directed that the obstinately disobedient child should be put to death ; as we read Deut. xxi. 18, 21. "If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them : then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place : and they shall say unto the elders of his city, this our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice ; he is a glutton and a drunkard. And all the men of his city shall stone hira with stones, that he die : so shalt thou put evil away from among you, and all Israel shall hear and fear." Again we read Lev. xx. 9. " Every one that cur- seth his father or his mother, shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother ; his blood shall be upon him." This law delivered by God himself to his people of old shows, the evil nature of this crime, and his great abhorrence of it. The great wickedness and dan- ger of transgressing this commandment are also proved by the following texts, Deut. xxvii. 16. " cursed be he that setteth light by his father or his mother: and all th^- 192 SERMON LXXI. people shall say, Amen." Pro. xx. 20. " Whoso curseth his father or his mother, his lamp shall be put out in ob- scure darkness." And Pro. xxx. 17. " The eye that mocketh at his father, and despiseth to obey his mother, the ravens of the valley shall pick it out and the young ea- gles shall eat it." This last text is prof ably not so much to be understood literally as of the fearful end to which such wicked children generally come. And all these texts show God's great displeasure against undutiful chil- dren. 5. Once more, this duty is enforced by examples which we have on record. Christ has set an example, which it is the duty of children to follow. Though he was the son of God as well as the son of Mary, yet of him it is recor- ded Luk. ii. 51. " and he went down with them (that is .Joseph and Mary) and came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them." The obedience of the children of Jonadab to the commands of their father, met with the marked appro- bation of God, and he greatly blessed them for it. As we learn from Jer. xxxv. 18, 19. "And Jeremiah said unto the house of the Rechabites, thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel, because ye have obeyed the commandment of Jonadab your father, and kept all his precepts, and done according unto all that he hath commanded you : there- fore thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel, Jona- dab the son of Rechab shall not want a man to stand be- fore me forever." Here we have an instance of the bles- sing of God signally following obedience to parents. And we have also in the Scriptures instancesof the divine ven- geance in asignal manner overtaking disobedient children in this life. Absalom was a disobedient son, and he came to an untimely end. Hophni and Phinehas the sons of Eli were disobedient children, and the vengeance of God in a remarkable manner overtook them ; and Ham the son of Noah was an undutiful son, and a curse fell up- on him and his posterity. Children and youth, these examples were recorded tor your instruction, take war- ning from them, and do your duty to your parents. And I believe that every age has witnessed examples, wherein God has signally blessed obedience, and frowned on dis- obedience to the fifth commandment. Inquire into the history of those who are now vagabonds in our streets, and I believe you will generally iind, they were disobedi- '■ DUTIES OF PARENTS TO CHILDREN. 193 tnit children. Go to our state prisons, and inquire into (he history of the younger years of the miserable culprits, there confined, and I believe you will generally find they were disol)edient children. Go to the gallows and in- quire of the unhappy wretch who is just about to be launched into eternity for his crimes, what was his con- duct in early life towards his parents, and I believe, you will generally find, he was a disobedient child. My young friends, consider all these weighty motives, and if any ofyou have heretofore been undutiful children, cease this wicked and dangerous course, and be induced ever to honour your father and mother, in all the extent of this command. To this you are urged, by the reasona- bleness of the duty, by the authority of God, by his prom- ises to the obedient, by his threatenings against the diso- bedient, and by the examples which occur in his word, and which we see or hear of in the world around us. SERMON LXXII. DUTIES OF PARENTS TO CHILDREN. EPHESIANS VI. 4. *■* And ye fathers^ jyrovoke not your children to wrath : but bring them vp in the nurture and admonition of the LordP These words contain one class of relative duties inclu- ded in the fifth commandment, viz. those of parents to- wards their children. Fathers only are here mentioned ; but undoubtedly, both parents are intended. The phrase " provoke not your children to wrath," signifies, not that parents should never cross their children ; but that they should not by passionate or unreasonable commands or correction, irritate their tempers. " The nurture and admonition of the Lord," include the whole duty of parents towards their children. JVurtnre may embrace nourishment in its utmost extent, as it relates to both bo- VOL. H. 25 194 SERMON LXXII. dy and mind. The word admonition expresses counsel and reproof, especially with regard to religion. The object of the ensuing discourse is to point out the duties of parents to children. The duties of parents begin very early. As soon as children are born, it is the duty of parents to take a ten- der care of them. Even irrational animals manifest a ten- der care of their young offspring ; but of all the kinds of an- imals, the human species are the most helpless, and most and longest need the care of parents. And God has for their security, while in this helpless state, wisely implan- ted in parents, a natural love of their children. Heijce a want of tender care in parents, towards their infant children, would prove them to be more brutish than the irrational animals. And such parents are monsters in hu- man form. It is the duty of parents also io provide for their children, during their younger years, things necessary for their sup- port and comfort. For ''if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith and is worse than an infidel." 1 Tim. v. 8. — Hence the indolent, who through idleness neglect to pro- vide for their families ; and the prodigal, who through dis- sipation waste their property, and deprive their children of a comfortable living, transgress the fifth commandment. Of this sin are those especially guilty, who' spend a por- tion of their daily earnings, at tipling houses, while their children are crying for bread at home, to satisfy the cra- vings of hunger. Again, it is the duty of parents to bring upiheiv children in such a way, that they may be fitted to gain a livelihood and be useful in the world, when they come to act for themselves. They ought to give them the opportunity, to obtain, at least so much of an education, as to fit them for business in life. They ought to endeavour early to lead them into habits of industry and frugality. And how- ever independent the prospects of children may be, they ought to be brought up in such an acquaintance with bu- siness of some kind, as to be prepared for a reverse in their circumstances, in this changing world. Many per- sons, who once had fair prospects have had great reason to deplore the neglect of parents in this respect. Again it is the duty of parents, to make provision for their DUTIES OF PARENTS TO CHILDREN. 195 children, if they have property, hy an equitable division of it among them after their death. For Paul tells us, " the children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the pa- rents for the children." 2 Cor. xii. 14. The above duties, which relate only to the temporal good of children are important ; but there are other du- ties incumbent on parents, which are far more important, I mean those which relate to their spiritual and eter- nal welfire. These are as much more important than the former, as eternity exceeds time in importance and duration. We proceed to point out the duties of parents towards their children in regard to their spiritual and eternal welfiire. It is their duty to do every thing in their pow- er, which, under the blessing of God, may operate as means, to bring them to the knowledge, love, and practice of true piety, and fit them for everlasting happiness. — More particularly, 1. It is the duty of parents early to dedicate their child- ren to God in his holy ordinance of baptism ; and thus acknowledge God's right to them, and put upon them the seal of the righteousnessof faith, which he has appointed, that they may be taken into visible covenant with him, and become partakers of the privileges and blessings connec- ted with this relation. This dedication of children to God in baptism, ought to be done in sincerity and truth, and with a hearty self-dedication. And unless it be done with the heart, it is solemn mockery instead of an acceptable dedication : and the act is offensive to God instead of well-pleasing in his sight. For, " unto the wicked God saith, what hast thou to do to declare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth." Ps. L. 16. They who manifest by their lives that they are enemies of God, if they are disposed to rush thouglitlessly into his presence, and take his covenant up- on their lips, ought not to be permitted to doit. But, at the same time, parents who neglect the baptism of their children live in sin ; for it is the duty of all immediately to be reconciled unto God, and to have right tempers to- wards him, and thus wait upon him in his ordinances. It is a very wrong conclusion, that our want of preparation takes awav our obligation to observe the divine institu- tions. Unpreparedness IS a sm, and one sin will not form J 96 SERMON LXXH. an excuse for another. It is our indispensable duty, im- mediately to love God ; and loving him, it is our duty, and our high privilege to wait upon him in his ordinances. And here permit me to remark, that what has been said, administers solemn reproof, especially to those parents who profess to have given themselves to God, and yet can neglect for months and years to acknowledge God's right to their children, by bringing them to baptism, and thus deprive them of what the word of God teaches to be an important privilege and benefit. The seal of the right- eousness of faith was required to be applied to the chil- dren of the Old Testament church, as early as the eighth day, which intimates to us that children ought to be early brought to God in the ordinance of baptism. Do you ask, of what advantage can this ordinance be to my child ? This is not the place, to say much on this subject. But the question may be answered in a few- words. Is it not an advantage to have them interested in the prayers for the church, and to be under its watch and care ? Is it not an advantage to have them interested in that great promise, " I will establish my covenant between me and thee, and thy seed after thee, for an everlasting covenant, to be aGod unto thee, and to thy seed after thee." Gen. xvii. 7. ? Is it not an advantage to belong to that visible family, to which is secured the oracles of God, and the means of religious instruction and grace.^ And is it not an advantage to make a part of that body, " to whom per- tain the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the service of God, and the promises." Rom. xix. 4. ? All these advantages the Scriptures teach us are connected with the right performance of this duty. Let christian parents, who delay or entirely neglect the baptism of their children, seriously think on this subject, and reform their conduct in this respect. If you neglect to give your children to God in baptism, you neglect a very important part of parental duty. 2. It is the duty of parents to inslmct iheir children in the things of religion. This is frequently enjoined in the word of God. Thus in the commandments given to the ancient church we find, " teach them thy sons, and thy son's sons. And I will make them hear my words, that they may learn to fear me all the days that they shall live upon the earth, and that they may teach their child- DUTIES OF PARENTS TO CHILDREN. 197 ren." Deut. iv. 9, 10. " And these words, which I com- mand thee this day, shall be in thine heart ; and thou shall teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up." Deut. vi. 6. 7. The Psalmist in the 78th Psalm, speaking of God's dealings of old, said— •' Our fathers have told us. We will not hide them from their child ren,showing to the generation tocome the praises of the Lord, and his strengh and his wonderful works that he hath done. For he established a testimony in Jacob, and appointed a law in Israel, which he commanded our fa- thers, that they should make them known to their chil- dren ; that the generation to come might know them, even the children which should be born ; who should arise and declare them to their children ; that they might set their hope in God, and not forget the works of God, but keep his commandments." Children ought early to be taught the leading histori- cal events recorded in Scripture as performed by the Pro- vidence of God. They ought also to be instructed in the leading doctrines of religion, such as the being and per- fections of God, the relations they bear to him, the obli- " gations they are under to love and serve him, the short- ness and uncertainty of human life, the immortality of their souls, their accountabihty to God as their Judge, their sinfulness and exposure to the wrath of God, their need of a Saviour, the character, offices, and sufferings of Christ, the way of salvation through him, and him alone, and the nature and necessity of regeneration, repentance, faith, and holy obedience. With such leading principles of religion, children ought to be made acquainted. They ought also to be taught to reverence the institutions of re- ligion, to respect the Sabbath, to attend in the house of God, to read the Scriptures, and to pray. And here, while on this branch of parental duty, per- mit me to say a few words on the subject of catechetical instruction. A catechism is intended to contain the great principles of religion, collected from the Scriptures, ar- ranged in systematic order, and expressed in short, in the way of question and answer. This is a very useful way of instructing children and youth. This mode of instruc- tion, was probably used by the Apostles, as some of the 198 SERMON LXXIl. learned have undertaken to show. From ecclesiastical history we know that it was used by the primitive fathers; and that a Catechist was an office of the primitive church. Many of the ancient councils, convinced of the import- ance of this way of conveying instruction, passed decrees for catechising. This mode of conveying instruction was of much use in advancing the reformation from Popery. Of this the Romish church was so well convinced that it was strongly urged in the celebrated council of Trent, that a catechism should be compiled containing the arti- cles of the Papal religion. And my brethren I believe I may safely assert, that wherever we find the people in general, in a congregation, well informed and established in the great doctrines of religion, there we shall also find catechetical instruction has been carefully attended to; and that in the same congregation they who neglected the catechism while children, will not bear a comparison in point of religious knowledge with those who have been carefully taught them. We also hear the judicato- ries of our church from the highest to the lowest, frequent- ly, in the addresses which they make to the churches, recommending and earnestly pressing this mode of instruc- tion. Be exhorted therefore my brethren, carefully to attend to the instruction of your children in the catechism. The Westminister catechisms, both Shorter and Larger, are most excellent systems, which I cannot recommend equal to their worth. Be exhorted frequently to read them yourselves, and diligently to teach them to your children. The increased attention to catechetical in- struction in this congregation is pleasing. It has doubt- less been already greatly blessed to this people, arid pro- mises under God to be still a great blessing. But are there not many children who are yet neglected ? I earn- estly hope that the time may soon come when no children of our congregation will be absent from our public cate- chisings ; when the catechising of families will uniform- ly make a part of the exercises of the evening of the Lord's Day ; and when none of our schools will be found deficient in this branch of education. 3. A tliird duty incumbent on parents in the rehgious education of their children, is id set an example of piety before them. Human nature, generally speaking, is led more by example than hy precept. And this is more espe- DUTIES OF PARENTS TO CHILDREN. 199 cially the case with the young. Youth is the age of imi- tation ; and the young are especially prone to imitate bad examples. It was a wise maxim of an ancient, " Great respect is due to children," intimating that we ought al- ways to conduct with circumspection in their presence. Parents should be careful to enforce all their instructions by their example, and to convince their children that they live under the influence of those truths which they endeavour to inculcate upon them. Though the instruc- tions of parents be ever so good, they will be of little a- vail, if their example contradicts their instructions ; for they undo with one hand, what they attempt to do with the other. Let the conduct of parents before their chil- dren, therefore, prove that they feel what they teach them. 4. Another important duty incumbent on parents, is prayer for their children. The apostle enjoins, " in every thing by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, lei your requests be made known unto God ;" Phil. iv. 6. Although parents can educate their children ; yet it is the grace of God alone that can make education an ef- fectual means of salvation. What the Psalmist said on another occasion may be aptly applied here, " except the Lord build the house they labour in vain that build it ;" Ps. cxxvii. 1. Except the Lord add his blessing to the endeavours of parents to bring up their children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord, they will labour in vain ; and he has appointed that his people should ask in order to receive his blessing. Let parents therefore often bear their children on their hearts at the throne of grace, and earnestly plead with God in their behalf. 5. Another branch of the duty of parents is, by their authority, to restrain their children from vicious courses. Parents have the right of authority over their children. They have a right to impose lawful commands ; and when other means fail, to enforce these commands by correction. And they not only have the right to correct their children; but when other means fail to restrain them from vice, it is their duty to correct them. Thus we read, " He that spareth his rod hateth his son : but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes ;" Prov. xiii. 24. " Chasten thy son while there is hope, and let not thy soul spare for his crying ;" Prov. xix 18. " Foolishness is bound in the 200 SERMON LXXII. heart of a child ; but the rod of correction shall drive ii far from him ;" Prov. xxii. 15. "Withhold not correction from the child; for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell ;" Prov. xxiii. 1 3, 1 4. " The rod and reproof give wisdom : but a child left to himself bringeth his mother to shame. Correct thy son and he shall give thee rest ; yea, he shall give delight unto thy soul ;" Prov. xxix. 15, 17. Abraham exerted his au- thority over his children, and he is particularly com- mended for it : "I know him (said the Lord,) that he will command his children, and his household after him and they shall keep the way of the Lord ;" Gen. xviii. 19. But here Eli failed; and he was condemned for it. When he heard of the great wickedness of his sons, he reproved them, saying, " Why do ye such things ? for I hear of your evil dealings by all this people. Nay, my sons ; for it is no good report that I hear : ye make the Lord's people to transgress;" 1. Sam. ii. 22. 24. But notwithstanding these reproofs, God denounced and exe- cuted judgments upon his house, because he did not go further, and exercise, his authority in endeavouring to restrain them. " I have told him, (said the Lord,) that I will judge his house forever, for the iniquity which he knoweth ; because his sons made themselves vile, and he restrained them not." Let parents derive instruction from the examples of these two men ; and not with Eli rest con- tented with advice and reproof alone when these prove ineJEFectual ; but with Abraham command their children to do that which is right, and enforce their commands. And here I would observe that parents ought to be particularly careful, into what company they suffer their children to go, and to keep them from the company of the wicked. This is perhaps one of the greatest dangers to which our cliildren are exposed. " Evil communica- tions corrupt good manners ;" 1 Cor. xv. 33. Children, as has already been observed, are very prone to imita- tion ; and on account of the propensity to sin in their na- ture, they are much more prone to imitate evil than good examples. Evil company is therefore exceedingly dan- gerous, and it is important that parents as they value the souls of their children, should restrain them from such associates, as will set before them a wicked example. J DUTIES OF PARENTS TO CHILDREN". 201 And further, I would here remark, that when parents place their children under the care and authority of oth- er persons, to obtain an education, or be instructed in the knowledge of some mechanic art, their duty to them requires that they should place them in a situation, where they have a security that their immortal interests will not be neglected. Thus I have pointed out the duties of parents to chil- dren. Weighty motives enforce these duties. 1. They are enforced by the authority of God. OuP text is express ; " Bring them up in the nurture and ad- monition of the Lord." And Prov. xxii. 6, we read, " Train up a child in the way he should go." A number of other texts in which parental duty is commanded have already been quoted. The religious education of chil- dren is therefore enforced by the authority of God. 2. The duties which have been pointed out are enfor- ced by the blessed effects which may follow the perform- ance of them. Reason teaches us that a correct educa- tion is of great importance. Of the permanency and strength of the prejudices of education every one must be convinced. Even the Heathen were sensible of the importance of training up children in the way in which they desired them to go. One of them recommended to all parents, tlie timely education of children, advising to train them up in learning, good manners, and virtuous exercises, since we commonly retain those things in age which we entertained in youth. Another being asked, what he thought most proper for boys to learn, answer- ed, " what they ought to do when they come to be men." And a wiser than either of these has told us under the- Spirit of inspiration, "Train up a child in the way he should go ; and when he is old he will not depart from it ;" Prov. xxii. 6. This being the case, it is certainly of vast importance that parents should educate their chil- dren aright. The future conduct, and therefore the fu- ture respectability, usefulness, and comfort of children in life are intimately concerned in their education ; and so also is the prosperity of both church and state, of which they are to compose the future members. For as a general rule, it is certainly true that children well edu- cated will act under the influence of those principles which they received in early years, and thus be respect-^ VOL. II. 26 202 SERMON LXXII. able, useful and happy in life, and a blessing to church and state. And as it respects the happiness of children III a future world, it is certain a religious education is of great importance. As God works by means in religion as well as in other things, there is a connexion between a good education and salvation. This we are taught to believe, not only from the effect which we see education have in other things, but also from the consideration that God has made it the duty of parents, religiously to edu- cate their children, and he would not have done this if it ■Was of no use. Besides he has given great encourage- ment, if he has not made absolute promises, that the pa- rent's fidelity shall issue in the salvation of the child. The promise to Abraham for his parental fidelity was that his children should keep the way of the Lord ; Gen. xviii. 19. And we also read, " Train up a child in the way he should go; and when he is old he will not depart from it ;" Prov. xxii. 6. Similar passages several times occur in the Scriptures. These declarations if they do not a- mount to absolute promises of salvation to children in consequence of parental fidelity, at least afford great en- couragement. The faithfulness of parents has doubtless been often blessed. Many have had reason in this life to bless God for a pious father, and more for a pious mother. Multitudes will have reason, through eternity to thank him for these inestimable privileges. And I believe, with comparatively few exceptions, they are the children of parents who attend to the religious education of their children, who are made partakers of the saving grace of God. Let parents therefore, if they desire or regard the everlasting welfare of their children, be faithful in their religious education ; and let them persevere in faithful- ness, and not faint under seeming discouragements. Even though God to try your faith and patience, and to mani- fest his sovereignty, cause you to wait long, yet he may answer you at last, and your example, prayers, instruc- tions, and reproofs may bring forth saving fruit, after you yourselves have gone to rest. The example of Monica the mother of the celebrated and pious Augustine of the fifth century deserves here to be mentioned for the encouragement of pious parents, who may be ready to give over their children as incorri- gible. Her Ron was a very dissolute youth ; but still she DUTIES OP PARENTS TO CHILDREN. 203 continued to instruct and exhort him, and daily to wrestle in prayer with God for his conversion. At a certain time she applied to a clergyman to talk with her son, which jhe from a sense of his incorrigibleness declining to do, she continued entreating him with tears, until he encour- aged her with these words, " A child of so many tears cannot perish." And so it issued. At the age of thirty he was turned unto God, and became one of the most pi- ous and useful men, that ever professed the christian faith. Parents, mothers especially, go and do likewise, and you may hope that if you persevere the Lord will grant your requests. 3. I present one other motive, and that is the dreadful consequences of unfaithfulness, both to parents and cnil- dren. The probability is, that if you neglect your duty, your children will be forever lost. The probability of this consequence is clear from what has already been said. Consider then the value of the souls of your chil- dren. You love them, and are anxious to provide for them, and procure them respectability and happiness in this world. But these although important are of little consequence in comparison of their eternal happiness. Oh ! feel for the everlasting interests of your children, and anxiously endeavour to procure for them the blessing of God. How can you bear the thought that they should be lost ! And lost too through your neglect ! Besides, remember that great will be your own guilt. And how will you bear to meet them in a future world ! O pa- rents, think of these things and be faithful to the souls of your children. SERMON LXXiU. DUTIES OF HUSBANDS AND WIVES. C0L0SSIAN3 III. 18, 19. " Wives submit yourselves imtoyour own husbands, as is fit ^ in the Lord. Husbands, love your wives, and be not bitter (f gainst themy In these words we have contained one of the most im- portant relations of life, viz. that of husband and wife ; and the duties of this relation are summarily pointed out. This relation is constituted by marriage, which is an ordinance of God. This ordinance was instituted in the garden of Eden, before the fall of our first parents, by God himself, when he brought the woman to the man, " And Adam said, this is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh :" And the Lord added, " therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife ; and they shall be o^ne flesh ;" Gen. ii. 23, 24. And our Saviour, when on earth, sanctioned this institution, by being himself present at a marriage, in CanaofGahlee and working a miracle for the accommodation of the guests. Marriage is therefore a relation sanctioned by divine approbation, and divine appointment, and " is honourable in all ;" and celibacy, or a voluntary passing through life in a single state, so far from being a virtue, as has been taught by the friends of monastic institutions, contravenes a divine appointment. It is true the apostle Paul in his epistle to the Corin- thians, rather advises Christians, except in certain cases, against marriage ; but he tells us he spake in this, his own opinion, and not by divine commandment ; and his opinion was founded on the then persecuted state of the church. "Now (says he) concerning virgins, I have no commandment of the Lord : yet I give my judgment ; I suppose therefore, that this is good fpr the present dis- DUTIES OF HUSBANDS AND WIVES. . 205 tress. I say that it is good for a man so to be. Art thou bound unto a wife ? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife ? — seek not a wife. But and if thou marry,thou hast not sinned. Nevertheless such shall have trouble in the flesh ;" 1. Cor. vii. 25— 28. The church was in an unsettled and persecuted state. Christians had frequently to flee from city to city, and were often exposed to the alternative of either renouncing their re- ligion, or undergoing imprisonment, suffering, and death. In this state of things, the more they were disencumber- ed with the world, and earthly connexions, the less temp- tations would they have, to shrink from the trials to which they were exposed. But the apostle by no means advises against marriage as a general principle, but speaks only in relation to the present distress. And he elsewhere frequently makes honourable mention of this relation, and points out the duties arising out of it. And in his epistle to Timothy looking forward with a prophet- ic spirit to the days of anti-christ, and foretelling the cor- ruptions which would then be introduced, he mentions among others, "forbidding to marry," and calls it a "doc- trine of devils;" 1 Tim. iv. 1, &c. Hence it is evident, no valid objection against this relation can be drawn from the writings of Paul. Marriage is a very important relation, and ought to be entered into with serious consideration. There is no step which persons take in life, in which their temporal, and not unfrequently, their spiritual happiness are more deeply concerned. But we have reason to fear, few are duly impressed with a sense of the importance of this re- lation, when they enter it. The direction of the apos- tle to Christians is to marry, " only in the Lord ;" I Cor. viii. 39. And, " be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers : for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness ? and what communion hath light with darkness ? and what concord hath Christ with Be- lial ? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel ?'* 2 Cor. vi. 14, 15. Christians know by experience that they have enough within them, to retard their spiritual progress ; that they need every external assistance to help them forward in their journey towards heaven ; and that while beheving partners may greatly promote the divine life in the soul, lighten spiritual burdens, by helping to 206 SERMON Lxxni. bear them, and may be a means of quickening them when they grow languid — unbelieving partners give no assist- ance, but by gradually infusing their spirit may greatly retard them, and by opposition may prove a source of heavy trial. We have many instances in Scripture where a breach of the rule to marry only in the Lord, has been productive of great evil. The intermarriages of the sons of Seth M'ho were God's visible people before the flood, with the wicked daughters of Cain, is given as the great cause of that exceeding corruption, which provoked God to de- stroy the old world with the flood. The marriage of E- 9au with the daughters of Heth was a great grief to the minds of his pious parents, and sensible of the danger of such a connexion, they took special care that Jacob should not unite himself with any of the Canaanitish women. God expressly prohibited the Israelites intermarrying with the Heathen ; and the transgression of this law, brought fre- quent judgments on the nation. Solomon's marriages with Heathen women were productive of great evil both to himself and his people. And doubtless, observation and experience, in the different ages of the church, have often proved the impropriety of such marriages. Marriage should be between only two persons. Poly- gamy is unlawful. On this subject, in our country, much need not be said. Polygamy always has been and still is practised in the East. But that it is wrong we are taught by the original institution of marriage, which was between only one pair. And our Saviour referring to the original institution, says, " have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning, made them male and female ; and said for this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and they twain shall be one flesh ? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh." Mat. xix. 4, 5, 6. And the apostle Paul in the frequent re- ferences which he makes to the conjugal relation, uni- formly speaks of it as existing between one man and one woman. And the domestic evils which polygamy has oc- casioned is an evidence of its impropriety, as we see es- pecially exemplified in the famihes of Abraham, Jacob, and Elkanah. It is true polygamy was practised by good men of old, as those whose names have just been mentioned, and also DUTIES OF HUSBANDS AND WIVES. 207 David, Solomon, and others ; and we do not find that the Lord censured them for it. Hence some have been ready to conclude that polygamy is not in itself unlawful. But we may rather suppose that this was one of the imperfec- tions of those good men, which the sacred historians faith- fully record, not for imitation, but to give a faithful narra- tive, and rather to warn, than to hold up examples for imitation. We proceed to what was principally intended in this discourse, viz. to point out the duties which arise out of this relation. Some of these are mutual, or common to both parties, and some are peculiar, to one or the o- ther. I. Let us attend to those duties which are mutual. I. It is the duty of married persons mutually to love each other above all other persons. The Scriptures fre- quently teach and enjoin this duty in the marriage rela- tion, as in the following passages. "And Adam said, this is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh : she shall be called woman because she was taken out of man. There- fore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife ; and they shall be one flesh." Gen. ii. 23, 24. " Rejoice with the wife of thy youth. Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe, and be thou rav- ished always with her love." Prov. V. 18, 19. And the apostle Paul in his Epistle to the Ephesians, repeatedly enjoins love in the marriage relation, and compares it to the love which exists between Christ and his church. — " Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it. So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies : he that loveth his wife loveth himself For no man ever yet hated liis own flesh ; but nourisheth and cherishcth it, even as the Lord the church. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh." Eph. v, 25, &c. In these passa- ges love is particularly enjoined upon the husband ; but the duty is undoubtedly mutual. And from the preced- ing texts it is evident, that love between the parties in the marriage relation, ought to be greater than they bear to any other persons whatever. If a person is to leave father and mother and cleave unto his partner; if the parties are no more twain but one flesh ; if their love is to be 208 SERMON LXXIII. like that which exists between Christ and his church ; and if they are to love one another as their own bodies and their own flesh — undoubtedly it must be their duty to love one another above all other persons. True conjugal love is something very diflferent from mere sensual passion. The latter persons may have for each other, when there is no real aifection. And this we have reason to fear, is the whole of the love, which many persons, who appear to be warmly attached, have for each other, before marriage. Where this is the sole or chief foundation of love, it cannot long continue. And this is undoubtedly one cause why we see so many unhappy af- ter marriage, who before appeared to be extravagantly fond of each other. Their fondness had no higher found- ation than sensual passion. True love is rational, and has esteem for its basis. We want a friend in the married state. And one who, if he or she were not related to us, we could not, on intimate acquaintance, esteem as a friend, is not likely to secure our affections, and make us happy in the married state. This remark is certainly very im- portant and ought to be duly attended to in the choice of a partner for life. A few lines from the celebrated Young in his Night Thoughts, aptly express the sentiment I wish to convey on this subject. " The bosom of a friend Where heart meets heart reciprocally soft, Each other's pillow to repose divine. Beware the counterfeit ; in passions flame Hearts melt ; but melt like ice; soon harder froze, True love strikes root in reason ; passion's foe." If then, my hearers, you would be happy in the mar- ried state, let reason and not passion be your guide in the choice of a partner for life. And if you would fulfil the duties of this relation, ever mutually and sincerely love one another above all other persons. Whoever in the married state does not this, comes short of his duty; and much more do they come short of their duty and commit sin, who hate their partners, and spend their lives in con- tention and discord, or even in indifference. DUTIES OF HUSBANDS AND WIVES. 209 2. Another mutual duty in the married state is fidelity towards each other. This is frequently enjoined in the word of God ; and the violation of this duty is very fre- quently and severely reprehended, and declared to be ve- ry offensive to God. And our Saviour makes it a suffi- cient ground on which for the innocent party to sue for and obtain a divorce. 3. Another important duty incumbent on both parties in this relation is mutual patience and forbearance towards each other, under the various infirmities and weaknesses to which human nature is subject in its present fallen state. Human nature in its present state is at best but imperfect. And whatever ideas youn^ persons may form of the perfection of the objects of their choice and affec- tions, a more intimate acquaintance to which marriage in- troduces them, will soon teach them that their partners are no more than human, subject to the infirmities inci- dent to human nature. And the erroneous opinions which persons sometimes' form of the perfection of the objects of their choice, are often the cause of domestic unhappiness after marriage, when they find their expectations disap- pointed. If we would fulfil the duties, and enjoy the hap- piness of the marriage relation, we must not look for per- fection in ourpartners ; and we must make allowances for ihe weaknesses of human nature, and bear with each oth- ers infirmities. In no relation is tlie exercise of that char- ily which the Scriptures describe and inculcate, more im- portant than this. " Charity suff*ereth long, and is kind — is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil — beareth all things, belie veth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things; charity never faileth." 1. Cor. xiii. 4. &c. — "Charity shall cover the multitude of sins." 1. Pet. iv. 8. The exercise of this charity in both parties will produce domestic tranquility, and generally, if practised only by one, will do the same ; and perhaps will always with the worst of partners make things better than they otherwise would be. And it is the want of this cliarity in exercise, that impairs the domestic happiness of a great many, and renders many persons wretched through life. Amidst the numerous occurrences of domestic life, circumstances will arise 1o ruffle tlie temper. When this is the case with eiihcr party, so'A words in the other might turn away anger, and prevent a vast deal of domestic mischief; when VOL. n. 27 210 SERMON LXXIII. finding fault and reproving while in tliis state, most fre- quently increases irritation, and after a time issues in a want of confidence, and constant coolness, and domestic broils. It seldom happens where persons are unhappy in the married state, that either party is entirely innocent, al- though one may be more to blame than the other ; for it is certain as a general rule, however one party may fail in his or her duty, if the other has prudence, and bears with these failings in meekness and patience as the law of God directs, and to these adds a uniform and loving behaviour, things may for the most part be kept in a tolerable way ; and not unfrequently the temper of the offending party may be o- vercome, or moderated, and sometimes an entire reforma- tion be effected. I know there may be exceptions to this rule ; for there are some monsters in human form, whom no kindness or prudence can soften or reclaim ; but such instances are probably rare indeed. 4. Another mutual duty in the married state is, that husband and wife should be helpful to each other. The Lord made Eve to he an help-meet for Adam. Man and wife have such an intimate connexion, that according to the word of God, they are no more twain, but one flesh. — They ought therefore certainly to he mutually helpful to each other. They ought to help bear each others bur- dens, and thus they will be greatly lightened. They ought to have but one interest, and mutually to promote this. They ought to endeavour to defend and advance each others honour and character. They ought to be bosom friends, and merit and maintain a mutual confidence in each other. And they ought to participate in each o- thers joys and sorrows, to sympathize with each other, to rejoice together, and to mourn together. And here we may observe that either husband or wife who wants frugality, economy, or care, or is indolent, or squanders away property to the injury of the other party and their common family, is guilty of a gross violation of this relation, and is highly criminal in the sight of God. — For " if any provide not ibr his own and especially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith and is worse than an infidel." 1 Tim. v. 8. 5. Another mutual duty in the married state is, that hus- band and wife should endeavour, to promote each other's spiritual and eternal good. We are bound to do good unto JDUTIES OF HUSBANDS AND WIVES. 211 others; and as the soul isof incomparably more importance than the body, it is our duty toendeavourto do good tothe souls of others ; and if it be our duty to endeavour to pro- mote as far as in us lies the salvation of the souls of others, undoubtedly it must be still more our duty dili- gently to endeavour to be the instruments of good to the souls of those w!io sustain such an intimate and dear con- nexion with us as is formed by marriage. Besides, by pro- moting each others spiritual interests, we will best se- cure domestic and temporal felicity. The duty of endeav- ouring to promote each others spiritual and eternal good is taught in the following texts. 1. Cor. vii. 14, 16. " For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wifie is sanctified by the husband. For what knowest thou, O wife, whether thou shalt save thy hus- band ? or how knowest thou, Oman, whether thou shalt save thy wife .^" And 1 . Pet. iii. 1, 2, 7. " Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands ; that if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives ; while they behold your chaste conversation coupled with fear. Likewise ye husbands dwell with them according to knowledge, giv- ing honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life ; that your prayers be not hindered." If they both be pious, they ought frequently to converse together about the things of religion, and endeavour to instruct and quicken one anoth- er ; and they ought to pray with and for each other. If one party be careless, the other ought to endeavour pru- dently and aflfcctionately to speak to them of their situa- tion, and exhort them to newness of life ; to maintaift-^a godly example before them ; and to pray earnestly to God for their salvation. But alas ! brethren, have we not reason to fear that most husbands and wives are crim- inally deficient in this article of duty ? II. We proceed to peculiar duties. Nature and the Scriptures give a certain authority to the husband. His peculiar duties may be surmned up in the proper exercise of this authority. In every society, it is necessary to its well-being, that there be some head. In the domestic so- ciety, the man is constituted the head. This superiority he has from nature. For he was created first, and the woman was made to be an help-meet for him. This ar- 212 SERMON LXXIII. gument is used by the apostle Paul, " I suffer not a wo- man to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve." 3 Tim. ii. 12. 13. " The man is not of the woman, but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman ; but the woman for the man." 1 Cor. xi. 8, 9. Nature also teaches the same^ by the superior strength and courage which the man possesses which indicate that he should be the head. Alluding to this the apostle Pe- ter (1 Pet. iii. 7.) calls the woman " the weaker vessel." But the Scriptures are full and express on this head. In the sentence which was pronounced upon the woman af- ter the fall, God told her, " thy desire shall be to thy hus- band, and he shall rule over thee." Gen. iii. 16. In Paul's Epistles we read, 1 Cor. xi. 3. " The head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is the man." 1 Cor. xiv. 34. " Let your women keep silence in the churches : for it is not permitted unto them to speak ; but they are commanded to be under obedience^ as also saith the law." — Eph. V. 22, 23, 24, 33. " Wives submit yourselves unto your own husbands as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church. Therefore, as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. Let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself ; and the wife see that she reverence her husband." Tit. ii. 3, 4. "That they may teach the young women to be obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed." And in our text, *' wives submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as is fit in the Lord." To the same purpose Peter speaks, 1 Pet. iii. 1 — 6. '• Likewise, ye wives be in subjec- tion to your own husbands, that if any obey not the word, they may also without the word be won by the conversa- tion of tfie wives ; while they behold your chaste conver- sation coupled with /ear : whose adorning &;c. For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjectionun- to their own husbands ; even as Sara obeyed Abraham, cal- ling him /ort/." This authority of the husband, he is to exercise for the good of the wife. Love to her is to be the governing principle. Hence it is that the whole of his duties are so DUTIES OF HUSBANDS AND WIVES. 213 frequently summed up in love ; as in our text, " husbands love your wives, and be not bitter against them." His au- thority is by no means that of a master over a slave, as many husbands practically suppose ; nor is it that of a fa- ther over his child ; but as the Scriptures represent, it is like that of the head over the members, and of Christ over Jiis church. He is to remember that she is his own flesh, or as it were a part of himself; and it becomes him ever to treat her as such ; to treat her as his companion, to exercise his government v*'ith meekness, love, and wis- dom ; to conduct towards her with tenderness ; and to nourish and cherish her and supply her v/ants. Jl' The peculiar duties of wives are in our text summed up in submission ; " Wives submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as is fit in the Lord." The same duty as we have seen from texts already quoted is frequently enjoin- ed. It is the duty of the wife to respect the authority of the husband, and cheerfully submit to it as commanded by God himself. Nor is she to do this from servile fear, as the slave does to his master ; but out of love, and re- spect to her husband, as the church obeys Christ. She ought to be careful to please him, and to endeavour to promote his interest, honour and happiness ; for in so do- ing she will best promote her own. Husband and wife thus living together, and fulfilling their duty towards each other according to the word of God, will make each other happy. And it is the trans- gression of the laws of God respecting the duties of this relation that makes so many married people unhappy ; or that at least impairs the happiness which they other- wise might enjoy in this relation. If the man rules with capriciousness, or without that high love directing all his conduct, which the Scriptures require, or is bitter against his wife, or tyrannizes over her, he greatly transgresses ; or if tlie woman usurps authority over the man, or refu- ses to submit to his lawful authority, she greatly trans- gresses. And if she succeed in establishing her authori- ty she not only sins ; but she generally, if not always, les- sens her husband's respectability, and with it her own ; and having obtained her end, she most generally despises him for his weakness. The way for a wife to support her own respectability and liappiness, is, to support and cheer- fully submit to the authority of her husband ; and in so 214 SERMON LXXIV. doing she will generally acquire such an influence over her husband, as will lead him to act according to her wishes. But she is bound to submit only in the Lord. When her husband requires her to break the law of God, or }Drohibits her from doing those things which God com- mands, she is to obey God rather than her husband, and trust consequences with him ; for the authority of God is paramount to every other. Thus I have endeavoured to point out the duties of the marriage relation, as they are taught by reason and the word of God. Let us in view of this subject, be humbled *«fcf we have come short of our duty, and repent, that we may obtain the remission of these as well as other sins. Let us take the word of God as our rule, and set ourselves implicitly to follow its directions ; and then we shall have happy families, and enjoy that felicity which the married state is eminently calculated to afford. SERMON LXXIV." DUTIES OF MASTERS AND SERVANTS. EPHESIANS VI. 5 9. •"^ Servants., he obedient to them that are your masters accor- ding to the flesh, toith fear and tremhling in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ : JVot ivith eye-service, as men-pleas- ers ; hut as the servants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart ; with good will doing service, as to the Lord, and not to men : Knowing that whatsoever good thing any man doeth, the same shall he receive of the Lord, whether he be bond or free. Jlnd, ye masters, do the same things unto them for- bearing threatening : knowing that your master also is in hear ven ; neither is there respect of persons with him.^'' The relation of master and servant has existed in society from the earliest ages of the world. A servant is one, who in a family, js under the authority of a master, and owes DUTIES OF MASTERS AND SERVANTlS. 213 liim subjection and obedience. Persons may be brought into this state of subjection in several ways. Some be- come servants by vohmtary compact or agreement. Be- ing originally free, they either indent themselves, or are bouiid by their parents for a certain term of years, to do a certain service, that they may receive a certain benefit. Such are apprentices. Some become servants by hiring themselves a certain time, for a certain compensation. Others again, through poverty, have become servants, by selling themselves, or being sold by their parents for sup- port. And, in some nations, persons have been sold a- gainst their will. In this way persons sometimes became servants among the Jews. For the Mosaic law contained rules for the treatment of such servants. As we read, Lev. XXV. 39, 40 ; " If thy brother that dvvelleth by thee be waxen poor, and be sold unto thee ; thou shalt not compel him to serve thee as a bond-servant : but as an hired servant, and as a sojourner he shall be with thee, and shall serve thee unto the year of Jubilee." That this custom, of reducing persons to servitude for debt, was practised among the Jews, we further learn, from a fact, stated 2 Kings iv. 1. " There cried a certain woman of the wives of the sons of the prophets unto Elisha, saying, thy servant my husband is dead ; and the creditor is come to take unto him my two sons to be bond-men." And also from one of the parables of our Saviour ; Mat. xviii : In which the servant who owed ten thousand tal- ents, and had nothing to pay, was commanded to be sold, with his wife and children to make payment. Again, liberty is sometimes forfeited, and persons are reduced to a state of servitude, as a punishment for crimes committed by them. Another way in which per- sons become servants, is by captivity in war. In ancient times, it was a general practice, when prisoners of war were not put to death, to make slaves of them. Barba- rous nations still continue the practice ; but among civil- ized nations, under the hght of Christianity, this mode of making slaves is not tolerated. Another way in which persons are brought into a state of servitude is, invading by force, and without provoca- tion, the terri(orics of an independent power, and seizing upon its inhabitants, and carrying them away captive ; or alluring them away under the mask ofpeace and friend- 216 SERMON LXXIV. ship, and thus reducing them and their posterity to perpe- tual slavery. In this way have many, now in our own country become slaves. Avarice may make pleas to justi- fy this mode of making slaves ; but both reason and the word of God condemn it. The slave trade by which sla- very was introduced into this country, is an exceedingly •wicked practice. The origin of the slavery which is found in this country is altogether wrong, and indefensible. But when persons are found to be in this state without the act of their present owners, it is more difficult to say what is duty. On this subject, I shall not in this place, at present express an opinion. The relation of master and servant does exist, and from whatever cause this re- lation may arise, the Scriptures point out the duties of those who sustain this relation. Our object at present is to ascertain these duties. I. As servants are first mentioned in the text, let us first attend to their duties. And let it be kept in mind, that by servants are meant, all who are under subjection to an- other as a master, whatever the means may have been, by which they were brought into this subjection. 1. It is the duty of servants to be obedient to their mas- ters. This is enjoined in the text : " Servants, be obedi- dent to them that are your masters according to the ilesh." The same duty is enjoined in the follovring texts; •'Servants obey in all things your masters according to the flesh ;" Col. iii. 22 : " Exhort servants to be obedient unto their own masters, and to please them well in all things ;" Tit. ii. 9. And here I would observe, that in masters, mistresses are included, and that servants owe to them the same duties as to masters ; and that the duties which are bind- ing on masters towards their servants are also binding on mistresses ; and that when in this discourse we use the word master, we mean mistresses also. Servants owe to their masters obedience. This obe- dience they should render from a regard to the authority of God, who has in his word pointed out the duties of those in this station, and who in his providence has per- mitted them to be brought into this condition, and has thereby signified his pleasure, that they should fulfil the duties of this station. These are reasons why they should obey even unrea- DUTIES OF MASTERS AND SERVANTS. 217 sonable and tyrannical masters. Such masters commit .^in, and for their sin they must render an account to him, wlio is their master in heaven ; but the sin of masters will not justify the disobedience of servants. This obedience should be performed, as enjoined in our text, " in singleness of heart ;" that is with a single desire and aim to please Christ, whom they obey, in con- scientiously obeying, from a regard to the divine authori- ty, their earthly masters. This obedience should also be performed, not with reluctance, but as enjoined in our text, cheerfully, because it is the will of God ; " With good will doing service, as to the Lord, and not to men." Again, this obedience should be performed, not only in the presence of their masters, or when under their inspection; but also in their absence. The command in our text is : "Not with eye service, as men-pleasers." Many servants watch the eyes of their masters, and as soon as they are out of their sight, prove unfaithful and disobedient. Christian servants ought not to act thus. Such conduct is forbidden by God, and is very displeasing to him, whose eye is always upon them. Again the obedience which it is the duty of servants to render to their masters ought to be performed without gainsaying, contradicting, or opposing their comiivinds ; and without muttering, or talking back with ill temper, when reproved ; as we read ; Tit. ii. 9, 16 ; " Exhort servants to be obedient un- to their own masters — not answering again." 2. Another duty of servants to their masters, is honour^ They ought to respect them, because they are their mas- ters, placed in the providence of God, in a superior station, and ovei" them. Tliey ought to think and speak respect- fully of them, and so conduct, as not to disgrace them by their coimexion with them. This duty is taught in our text : " Servants be obedient to them that are your mas- ters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling." And also in the following passages of Scripture ; " Ser- vants, be subject to your masters with all fear ; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the fro ward ;" 1 Pet. ii. 18. '•' Let as many servants as are under the yoke count tlieir own masters worthy of all honour, that the name of God, and his doctrine be not blasphemed ;" 1 Tim. vi. 1. This was the direction to Christian servants, who had Heathen masters. Even in that case, they were VOL. II, 2B ill 8 SERMON LXXIV. to honour them as their masters, and to count them wor- thy of all honour. The apostle then, in the next verse gave directions to those Christian servants, who had be- lieving masters. " They that have believing masters, let them not despise them, because they are brethren ; but rather do them service, because they are faithful and be- loved partakers of the benefit ;" 1 Tim. vi. 2. The a- postle supposed that some servants might conclude, that because their masters were brethren with them in Christ, they were therefore on an equality with them, and did not owe them respect and obedience. Such a conclusion he forbids, and teaches that therefore they were the rath" er to do them service. Because they were brethren in Christ, they owed them, instead of dimuiished, increased respect and obedience. 3. Another duty which servants owe their masters is faithfulness. Eye-service is forbidden in our text. And servants are commanded. Tit. ii. 10 : "Not purloining, but showing all good fidelity." Eleazer when he served Abraham, Jacob when he served Laban, and Joseph when he served Potiphar were examples of fidelity. Our Saviour also taught this duty in one of his parables ; Mat. xxiv. 45, &c. : " Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord hath made ruler over his household. Blessed is that servant, whom his lord, when he cometh shall find so doing. But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart my lord delayeth his coming ; and shall begin to smite his fellow-servants, and to eat and drink with the drunken ; the lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of, and. shall cut him asunder, and ap- point him his portion with the hypocrites." It is the duty of servants faithfully to attend to the bu- siness of their master, with dihgence execute his com- mands, be careful of the interests committed to them, and not suffer things to be wasted through their indolence or carelessness. They ought to make their master's interest their own ; and to pursue it and take care of it as such. And this they ought to do not only when their master's eye is upon them, but at all times. Such are good ser- vants, and the conduct of such is well-pleasing to God. But we have reason to fear, there are comparatively few such servants. Idleness in a master's absence, opposition DUTIES OF MASTERS AND SERVANTS. 219 or indifference to his interest, carelessness about what belongs to hirn, suffering it to be wasted, and purloining or pilfering or stealing something that is his, or knowing that others do so and concealing it — these, we have rea- son to fear, are sins of which many servants are guilty ; and for these sins unless they repent and reform, God will one day punish them. 4. Another duty which servants owe their masters is patience under their corrections^ both when they deserve correction and when they do not. It is the duty of ser- vants, when they have received deserved correction, pa- tiently to submit to it ; and be sorry for their faults which have made correction needful, and do so no more. And when they have received correction undeservedly, as is sometimes the case, it is their duty to be submissive, and not be impudent to their masters, or rise up in opposition to their authority to take revenge. There is a legal way of redress, in case of injurious treatment, which a servant is undoubtedly authorized to seek. But in case he can- not obtain redress in an orderly and regular manner, it is his duty to commit his cause to God, who has said, "Ven- geance is mine I will repay;" Rom. xii. 19; and patient- ly to bear tlie corrections which in his providence, he suf- fers to be laid upon him, and to improve them for hia spiritual and eternal good. That this is his duty is clearly proved by the following passage: 1 Pet. ii. 18 — 20; "Ser- vants, be subject to your masters with all fear ; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froAvard. For this is thank-worthy, if a man for conscience toward God en- dure grief, suffering wrongfully. For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it pa- tiently ^ but if when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God." il. I proceed to point out the duties of masters. The command in our text is : " And ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening : knowing that your master also is in heaven ; neither is there respect of persons with him. By the command, "do the same things unto them," we are to understand an injunction to per- form correspondent duties, and that masters should act towards their servants from the same principles, viz. a regard to the divine authority, and as accountable to God. 220 SERMON LXXIV. 1. It is the duty of masters to be reasonable in their commands, and to require nothing of their servants ; but what is right. Masters ought to remember that their servants have human nature as well as themselves, and are descended from the same original, thouo-h in the over- ruhng providence of God, they are placed in an inferior condition in society. As said Job, when protesting his integrity : " If I did despise the cause of my man-servant or of my maid-servant, when they contended with me ; what then shall I do when God riseth up ? and when he visiteth what shall I answer him ? Did not he that made me make him ? And did not one fashion us ?" Job xxxi. 13, — 15. They ought not to require more service from them, than they are able to perform. And they ought not to impose upon them any commands contrary to the law of God. If they do, servants are not bound to obey; for the authority of God is paramount to every oth- er ; and in this as in every other, the inferior is bound to obey only in the Lord. A good rule, in every condition and relation in life, is to do to others, as we w ould have them, were we in their situation and they in ours, to do to us. 2. Masters ought to provide things necessary for the comfort of their servants. The direction of the apostle Paul is, "• Masters, give unto your servants that which is just and equal ; knowing that ye also have a master in heaven;" Col. iv. 1. On this head there are two extremes to be avoided. The one is an over delicate treatment and provision. Experience has proved this to be dan- gerous and wrong. Hence the wise man cautions against it : '^ He that delicately bringeth up his servant from a child shall have him become his son at length ;" Prov. xxix. 21. The other extreme is neglect ; leaving them to suffer for want of necessary provision, or apparel, or at- tention and medicine in sickness. 3. Masters ought as our text enjoins to forbear threaten- ing. By this we are not to understand, that masters are never to threaten their servants ; for this is a part of that salutary discipline, which is sometimes necessary. The word " forbearing" in the text signifies moderating ; and the object of the command is, to restrain those violent, furious, and terrifying tlireats, which are the product of unbridled passion. DUTIEii OF MASTERS AND SERVANTS. 221 4. Masters ought when necessary, and when servants are in such a sense under their authority as to render it proper, to correct Ihem. The best good of the scjv^nt ought to be sought ; and when other means fail to le:»d him to do his duty, the rod of correction ought to be usod. But tlie good of the servant ought always to be the nile in administering correction. Masters ought neve/ i:> or- rect in a passion ; nor ought they to correct to take re- venge and gratify passion. Correction, which ought al- ways to be with humanity, may, if administered under the influence of passion, be cruel. Some persons never cor- rect, unless they are in a passion. Such persons are cer- tainly wrong ; and their corrections are not likely to do much, if any good. .O. Masters should allow servants when they are accu- sed of doing wrong, liherty to plead, and if they can, to prove their innocency. Job in solemnly protesting his integrity, mentioned this among other things : " If I did despise the cause of my man-servant, or of my maid-servant, when they contended with me;" Job. xxxi. 13. If servants are not guilty, they do not deserve correction. Neither will coiTcction answer any good purpose ; for the end of cor- rection is to convince of the evil of a fault, and to lead a person to do so no more. 6. With respect to hired servants, it is the duty of mas- ters fully and punctually to j)ny tjiem their wages. Hear the word of the Lord on this head : " Thou shalt not op- press an hired servant ; at his day thou shalt give him his hire, neither shall the sun go down upon it, for he is poor, and setteth his heart upon it : lest he cry against thee unto the Lord, and it be sin unto thee ;" Deut. xxiv. 14, 15. And again : "Behold the hire of the labourers who have reaped down your iields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth ; and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord of Saba- oth ;*' Jam. v. 4. 7. Another very important duty of masters towards ser- vants is, the care of their souls. Servants have souls equal- ly valuable with those of their masters. And for the manner in which they have acted towards these souls, must masters one day give a solemn account to their mas- ter in heaven. It is important that masters sliouM be im- pressed with a solemn sense of their responsibility in this 222 SERMON LXXIV. respect, and set themselves faithfully to perform their du- iy. Thus Abraham did. " I know him (said the Lord) that he will command his children and his household af- ter him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord." Gen. xviii. 19. And thus also Joshua did. " As for me and my house (said he) we will serve the Lord." Josh, xxiv. 15. In exercising due religious care over servants, se- veral particular duties are incumbent. It is the duty of christian masters to dedicate the servants which belong to them, unto God in baptism ; and thus to bind them- selves to God and his church, for the performance of their duty towards them ; and that their servants may be- come interested in those blessings which are connected with a visible relation to the church of Christ. In proof of this duty you are referred to the example of Abraham, the father of the faithful, and the pattern of believers. He put the sign of circumcision, which was then the seal of the righteousness of faith, not only upon his sons ; but al- so upon all the males that were born in his house, and that were bought with his money. And christian masters are equally bound now to have them baptised, as Abraham was of old to have them circumcised. Many christians in many parts of the church do feel their obligations in this respect and do perform this duty ; and we have had some instances of it among ourselves, though many ne- glect it. Again, it is the duty of masters to give their servants re- ligious instruction, and to give them opportunities to gain such instruction. They ought to be taught to read, that they may read the word of God for themselves. And they ought to be instructed in the great principles of the chris- tian religion. And when they manifest a disposition, they ought to be allowed a reasonable time, and suitable op- portunities to enable them to gain religious instruction. And here I would remark that the present generation en- joy opportunities to acquire knowledge and gain rehgious instruction, which those who have lived before them have not enjoyed. I have reference particularly to Sabbath Schools. It is the duty of servants who have the liber- ty, to attend these schools. And it is the duty of masters to give them the liberty ; and further, if necessary, to ex- ercise their authority to cause them to attend upon this important means of instruction. DUTIES OP MASTERS AND SERVANTS. 223 Again it is the duty of masters to set a good example before their servants ; and to recommend religion to them by their example. The influence of example is great, and without this the best instructions will probably be lost. Again it is the duty of masters to give their servants time and opportunity to attend upon the means of grace ; and to see that they do attend upon them. They ought to be allowed and required to attend upon the public worship of God's house, and not to be detained except in cases of necessity. They ought also to require them to attend upon family worship. And it is their duty to re- strain them from violations of the Sabbath day. In this respect, many masters are very guilty ; for the Sabbath is kept by their Servants as a holiday. Masters who allow this, or who do not take the measures in their power to prevent it, are very guilty in the sight of God ; and will have a sad account to render to their master in heaveu when he comes to reckon with them. Besides masters will and do suffer in their temporal interests for these things. Nothing more effectually tends to destroy every moral principle, and therefore to make servants unfaithful than Sabbath-breaking. Let masters be exhorted as they regard their own temporal interests, and as they would not have the blood of their souls laid to their charge in the great day of account, to require their servants to ab- stain from the profanation of the Sabbath, and outwardly to respect and observe its institutions. Once more, it is the duty of masters to pray for their servants. All other attempts for their spiritual and eter- nal good, ought to be followed with prayer to God for his blessing, to render the means used, effectual to their ever- lasting salvation. From this subject we learn that the christian religion is excellent, and calculated to promote human happiness. — If servants were to perform their duty, and masters their's as enjoined in the Scriptures, they would mutually pro- mote each others happiness. God who has given such a law, so calculated to promote the happiness of his crea- tures, must be good, and worthy to be loved and obeyed. And the religion which is calculated to make persons good and happy in the several stations and relations of life, must be excellent, and is worthy to be embraced by all. 224 SERMON LXXV. Let servants suffer this discourse to have its due efleci upon their minds. Study to become acquainted with the duties of your station, as they are taught in the word of God; and conscientiously endeavour to perform them, as to the Lord. If you expect God's favour, you must be obedient to his commands. If you have but little commit- ted to you, be faithful in that little, " knowing that what- soever good thing any man doeth, the same shall he re- ceive of the Lord, whether he be bond or free." Remem- ber that you have immortal souls ; and let the care of these be your great concern. And remember that one, and an important part of true religion is, to be faithful, in the performance of the duties of the station in which you are placed, and the relations you bear to others. And let masters remember, that they are accountable to one, who is their master in heaven for the perfor- mance of their duty in this as well as every other rela- tion. Let them study to know their duty, and set them- selves to perform it. Let them be humbled for past sins in this respect, and reform. And let them especially ev- er maintain a deep sense of the value of the souls of their servants ; and by every means which God has made it their duty to use, endeavour to effect their eternal salva- tion.— Amen. SERMON LXXV. DIRTIES OF RULERS AND RULEl>. ROMANS xni. L ^' Lei every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God : the powers theft be^ are ordaincff ofGodr Civil government is a divine ordinance, designed for the good of mankind. Man is a social creature. He there- fore naturally associates with his fellow-man. This he DUTIES OP RULERS AND RULED. 225 does, not only from necessity, for mutual help and protec- tion; but also from a natural love to society. And if it is agreeable to human nature, that men should associate with each other, laws are evidently necessary to enable them to live together, with any tolerable degree of happi- ness in society. For man is a depraved creature, and selfishness naturally predominates in his heart. Laws are therefore necessary, to regulate and restrain the selfish passions of men, preserve order in society, protect the rights of its several members, and promote the good of the whole. Even in the most virtuous civil communities, composed of such a race as ours, laws must be necessary to restrain and punish the wicked, and to decide disputes which from the blindness, prejudice, and selfishness of human nature, in even the best of men, will arise in society. And if laws are necessary, it is necessary they should be made and administered, and therefore that there should be rulers and consequently ruled. Hence, the relation of rulers and ruled arises out of the nature of man ; and therefore civil government is an ordinance of God, who is as much the author of all those good institutions, Avhich arise out of the nature of things, as he is of those for which there is his positive command. Besides tlie Scriptures expressly ascribe the origin of civil government to God. This is done in our text; " There is no power but of God ; the powers that be are ordained of God." The same is repeatedly taught in seve- ral verses following our text. "Whosoever therefore re- sisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance ofGod. He is the minister of God to thee for good. He is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. They are God's ministers." Elsewhere we are taught the same truth, as in the following passages. " By me kings reign, and princes decree justice. Byrne prin- ces rule, and nobles even all the judges of the earth;" Prov. viii. 15, 16. "He removeth kings, and setteth up kings ;" Dan. ii. 21. " The most High ruleth in the king- dom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will;" Dan. iv. 32. "Governors are sent by him for the punishment of evil-doers, and for the praise of them that do well ;" 1 Pet. ii. 14. From these texts it fully appears that civil gov- ernment is of divine appointment. But we are not to sup- pose that any particular form was divinely appointed, t/-e6'^^;er or elder, because it is his dutj to be grave and prudent, and an example to the people. He is called the angel of the church because he is the mes- senger of God. He is termed ambassador, as he is sent bj God to treat with sinners. And he is named steivard of the mysteries of God, as he dispenses his grace and ordinances. From the institution of a church, and the appointment ©f this officer in the church, arises the relation o( minister and people. The object of the ensuing discourse is to point out the duties of this relation. And I. The duties of mm/^r^cr^ towards the people of their charge. These may be summed up in love, labour, dis- cipline, example, and prayer. 1. It is the duty of ministers to love their people. They ought to feel a tender love for their souls, and an earnest desire to advance their spiritual interests. This duty is taught, 1 Thes. ii. 7, 8 ; where the Apostle speaking of himself, and his fellow ministers, says, " We were gentle among you even as a nurse cherisheth her children : so being affectionately desirous of you, we w^ere willing to have imparted unto you, not the gospel of God only, but also our own souls, because ye were dear unto us." Thus ought every minister of the gospel to feel towards the people of his charge. This principle in exercise will be the best security, for the faithful discharge of all the duties which he owes to his people. But the want of this princi- ple, while it will render him very criminal in the sight of God, will make his business a drudgery, and will almost certainly lead him to neglect many of his duties. 2. It is the duty of ministers to labour among their peo- ple, and diligently perform all those services, which be- long to them as ministers of Christ, and pastors of a flock. This duty is taught in our text, '^ We beseech you breth- ren, to know them which labour among you ; and esteem them very highly in love for their work's sake." The la- bour or work of a minister comprises several particular duties, such as preaching the word, administration of ordi- nances, visitation of families and particularly of the sick, and catechising of the children and youth of his charge. It is his duty to pj'each the word. This is the leading 236 SERMON LXXVI. and most important part of his work. The command of our Saviour to his apostles was, " Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel ;" Markxvi. 15. And the direction of Paul to Timotliy was, " preach the word ;" 2 Tim. iv. 2. Preaching is a minister's leading duty, and he is to preach the ivord — the revealed word of God. He is to preach the gospel, that is, glad tidings to sinners through Jesus Christ. He ought with Paul, '"not to know anything among" his people in his preaching to them, "save Jesus Christ and him crucified ;" 1 Cor. ii. 2. If he would do his people good, every sermon ought to have a bearing on Christ and him crucified, or grow out of this subject. As to the manner in which he ought to perform this duty. He ought to be diligent. The command is, "Preach the word; be instant in season, out of sea- son ;" 2 Tim. iv. 2. A minister ought not to be con- tent with merely preaching as often as may be cus- tomary on the Sabbath ; but he ought gladly to em- brace opportunities, to preach sometimes on other days, when his other ministerial avocations will permit. He ought to preach plainly, so that he may be easily under- derstood by all his hearers. For in almost all congrega- tions many are unlearned, and need great plainness of speech. "We use" said Paul to the Corinthians, "great plainness of speech;" 2 Cor. iii. 12. He ought to preach faithfidly, making known to his people the whole counsel of God. Ministers are stewards of the mysteries of God," and " it is required in stewards that a man be found faithful;" I Cor. iv. 1, 2. He ought to preach w/Ve/y, a- dapting his discourses to the state and necessities of his people. Thus Paul exhorted Timothy; "Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth ;" 2 Tim. ii. 15. And he ought to preach zealously, and show that he is in earnest in his work. Thus it is said of Apol- los, "being fervent in the spirit, he spake and taught dili- gently the things of the Lord :" Acts xviii. 25. Another important part of a minister's work in which it is his duty to labour among his people is to adniinister the ordinances of baptism and the Lord's supper unto those duly qualified to receive them. Thus when our Lord commissioned his apostles to preach, he also commission- DUTIES OF MINISTERS AND PEOPLE. 237 ed them to baptize ; and we find them frequently engaged in breaking bread, and celebrating the Lord's supper, with the primitive christians. Another part of their work in which it is their duty to labour, is, as far as may be consistent with other duties, to visit their people, and carry instruction and exhorta- tion from house to house. This is a laborious, but it is an important part of ministerial duty, and has been often crowned with a divine blessing. Thus Peter and John dj^ily not only in the temple, but in every house ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ ; Acts v. 42. And Paul taught the Ephesians, not only publicly, but from house to house ; Acts xx. 20. Especially ought ministers to visit the sick ; as we read, James v. 14 : " Is any sick, among you ? let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over them." Another part of his work in which it is his duty to la- bour is the catechetical instruction of the children and youth of his congregation. The direction of Christ to Peter was, "feed my lambs ;" John xxi. 1.5. The rising generation are the hope of the church. And it is of tlie utmost importance that they be well instructed, and no mode of instruction is better calculated to promote their spiritual good, or has been more crowned with the divine blessing among children and youth, than this. Thus it is the duty of ministers to labour among their people, in preaching the word, in administering the ordi- nances, in visiting their people and especially the sick, and in catechising the children and youth. And to these and the other duties of their ofHce, which relate to the churcli at large, and the general interests of religion, they ought to be devoted. They ought to follow the direction of Paul to Timothy: "Give thyself wholly to these things;" 1 Tim. iv. 15 ; and to take up the resolution of Paul with respect to the Corinthians;" 1 will very gladly spend and be spent for you ;" 2 Cor. xii. 1 5. 3. It is the duty of a minister, in connexion with those who are appointed to be helps and governments in the church, to exercise a watchful care mvS discipline oy^Y i\ic people of his charge. This duty is taught in t!ie followi;ig clause of our text ; " and are over you in the Lord, and admonish you." There is a spiritual authority given to 238 SERMOiV LXXVl. ministers which it is their duty to exercise for the good ol' their people. It is their duty carefully to guard the seal- ing ordinances of the church ; and in the admission of persons to them, to put a difference between the holy and profane, the clean and the unclean. And it is their duty to watch over those, who are within the pale of the church, and when they see them going astray to admon- ish, and endeavour to reclaim them ; and also to exclude the scandalous from those privileges which they have for- feited by their crimes. The|exercise of discipline is one of the most painful duties which ministers have to perform. But painful as it is, a minister, if he would be faithful to Christ and his people, must perform it. The good of those who so conduct as to deserve this discipline, requires it; as also does the good of the church and the cause of reli- gion. For the continuance of scandalous members in the communion of the church, grieves the truly pious, encour- ages professors who have not the grace of God, to give a loose reign to their corrupt propensities, staggers and dis- courages the enquiring, emboldens the careless to re- proach religion, and coTifirms them in their carelessness and wickedness. And I would hazard the assertion, that no particular church can continue long in a flourishing condition in tlie neglect of discipline. The truth of this assertion is confirmed by the nature of things, and by facts; and it is futlier confirmed by the consideration that the duty of exercising discipline is most clearly taught and enjoined in the Scriptures ; as in the following text among others. Our Saviour giving directions to his disciples, in the case of an offending member, concerning whom complaint was made to the cliurch, said, " If he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican. Verily I say unto you whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven ; and what- soever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.-' Mat. xviii. 17. 18. And the apostle Paul in the verse following our text, exhorts, " warn them that are unruly." And he charged Timothy, " reprove, rebuke.-' 2 Tim. iv, 2. And again, " them that sin, rebuke before all, that oth- ers also may fear." 1 Tim. v. 20. And in the same Epistle speaking of Ilymeneus and Alexander, he says, " Whom I have delivei-ed unto Satan that they may learn not to blaspheme." And he directed the Corinthians with re- BUTIES OF MINISTERS AND PEOPLE. 239 spect to the incestuous member, " Put away from among yourselves that wicked person.'* Hence it is evident that it is the duty of ministers to exercise discipHne among the people of their charge. 4. Another duty Avhich a minister owes to his people, is to set an c:ram/^/e of piety before them. He ought to preach to them by his example as well as by precept. — The influence of example is very great, and where a min- ister, even though his preaching be good, does not set a good example, his precepts will be likely to have little or no effect. He undoeth with one hand what he attempts to do with the other. This duty of a minister is plainly taught in the following charge of Paul to Timothy — " Be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversa- tion, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity." 1 Tim. iv. 12. Ministers ought so to conduct before their people, that they can sincerely say to them, with Paul, "Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ." 1 Cor. xi 1. 5. Another duty which ministers owe to their people is to pray for them ; and this they ought to do, not only in the public assembly, but in their closets. This was the coiastant practice, of that bright example for a gospel mimster, the apostle Paul. Thus to the Romans he wrkes — " God is my witness, whom I serve with my spir- it ia the gospel of his Son, that without ceasing I make meration of you always, in my prayers." Rom. i. 9. So al- so to the Ephesians, " I cease not to give thanks for you, making mention of you in my prayers." Eph. i. 16. And to the Thessalonians, " We give thanks to God always for you all, making mention of you in our prayers." 1 Thes. i. 2. Ministers are dependent on God to give success to their labours. Paul may plant and Apollos water, but God must give the increase. Ministers ought to feel their deper.idence on God ; and earnestly and perseveringly to seek his blessing to attend their labours. They ought daily to bear their people on their hearts at the throne of grace, and ask the blessing of Ciod for them. Having thus pointed out the duties of a minister to- wards his people, we proceed, II. ""To point out the correspondent duties of the people toward's their minister. The people have duties on their part as well as the minister. The duties of a people to- wards 4 heir minister may be summed up in love, tender- 240 SERMON LXXVI. ness ofhis character ; attendance upon his ministrations, support of discipline and submission to it, maintenance, and prajer. 1. It is the duty of a people to love their minister. This duty is tauiEcht in our text — " Esteem them very highly in love for their work's sake." And also Gal. iv. 14, 15. where the Apostle, with commendation, bears testimony to the affection of the Galatians for him. "Ye received Hie as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus. I bear you record, that if it had been possible, ye would have pluck- ed out your own eyes, and have given them to me." The ground of this love which a people ought to bear to their minister is the work in which he is engaged. He is an ambassador of Jesus Christ, and comes in his name. He ought therefore to be respected for his office ; and he that thinks lightly of, and despises a minister of the gospel as such, lightly esteems and despises his Master in whose name he comes. Thus when Christ sent forth his disci- ples to preach the gospel, he said to them. -^ He that hear- eth you, heareth me ; and he that despiseth you, despi- seth me ; and he that despiseth me, despiseth him that sent me." Luk. x. 16. The work in which ministers are engaged is the most important business in our world ; for their work has for its end, the advancement of the kingdomof Christ, and the salvation of immortal souls. — If people therefore ought to love the kingdom of Christ and their own souls, they ought to love their minister who is engaged in endeavouring to promote these important interests. 2. It is the duty of a people to feel and to exercise a ten- der regard for ihc character of their minister. '1 hus we read, •• against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two ifiv three,witnesses." 1 Tim. v. 19. Charity which is so of- ten enjoined, and commended in the Scriptures; is here peculiarly a duty ; and evil speaking which is so often condemned is here especially to be condemned ; because the success of the cause of Christ is most intimately con- nected with the good name of the ministers of religion. These remarks are not intended to intimate that if a min- ister be guilty of scandalous crimes, they ought not to be noticed ; but that people should not look ibr perfection in their minister, that they should cast the veil of chaiity over the imperfections inseparable from human nature, DUTIES OF MINISTERS AND PEOPLE, 241 that they should defend his character against false as- persions, that they should be slow to believe an ill report against him, and never do it but when well attested, and that then they should not spread it abroad unless the good of the church imperiously requires it. 3. It is the duty of a people to attend upon the ministra- tions of their minister. That this is duty is evident from the correspondent duties of the minister. If it is his duty to preach to his people, it is undoubtedly their duty to at- tend upon his preaching; and as the Apostle exhorts, not to tbrsake the assembling of themselves together. — Heb. X. 25. It is their duty to attend and hear the word when it is preached ; and also to take heed how they hear, and to profit by what they hear. Hence they ne- glect the duty which they owe to their minister, as well as to tlieir God, and their own souls, who seldom or ne- ver attend upon his preaching. And if it be the duty of a minister, as we have seen, to preach the word out of season as well as in season, or occasionally on other days of the week as well as statedly on the Sabbath, it must be the duty of a people when they are not necessarily pre- vented by the interference of other duties, to wait upon such occasional preaching; and people who are blessed with such opportunities, ought to esteem them a privilege and to prize and improve them. Again if it be the duty of a minister to administer gospel ordinances among his people, it is the duty of his people to prepare to receive these ordinances, and to wait on God in them. If it be his duty to carry instruction as far as practicable from house to house, it is their duty cordially to receive such visits, to require their famihes to attend upon them, and to listen to the instructions which are thus communicated. If it be his duty to visit the sick, it is tlieir duty to send for him, and be ready to listen to histruction. And if it be his duty to catechise the children, it is the duty of pa- rents to see that they are taught the catechism, and that they attend upon the catechetical instruction of the pas- tor. 4. Another duty which a people owe to their minister, is to siqjport him in maintuininir the discipline of the church, and meekly to submit to its due exercise. If it be his dut\^ as we have shown it is, to reprove and rebuke those who are wandering, and in connexion with the other officers of vol . If, 31 242 BERMON LXXVI. the church to exclude from its privileges the scandalous, most assuredly the people ought to put no hindrances in his way ; but rather uphold and support him ; and those who themselves become the subjects of such discipline, ought, instead of opposing the ordinance of Christ, meek- ly to submit to it, endeavour to profit by it, and be led to that repentance which it is designed to work in them. — On this point the Apostle has instructed people in their duty. " Obey them that have the rule over you, and sub- mit yourselves ; for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account." Heb. xiii. 17. 5. It is another duty of a people to give a sufficient Worldly maintenance to their minister. This has been de- nied. But it is astonishing how any person, who profes- ses to believe the Scriptures, can for a moment doubt on this subject. For no duty is more plainly taught in the word of God. If some were to speak on this point in cer- tain places they would be charged with selfish motives'"; but I can speak with confidence as I address a people who know, and who have ever manifested a willingness to do their duty in this respect. Under the Old Testament dis- pensation, God took special care that the priests and Le- vites, who were appointed to minister in holy things, should be provided for by the people. And in the New Testament the duty of supporting ministers of the gospel is repeatedly taught. Christ told his disciples, whom he sent forth to preach, " the labourer is worthy of his hire." Luk. X. 7. And in the epistles of Paul we read, " Let him that is taught in the word, communicate unto hina that teacheth, in all good things." Gal. vi. 6. " If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnal things ? Do ye not know that they which minister about holy things, live of the things of the temple } And they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar } Even so hath the Lord ordained, that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel." 1 Cor. ix. 11, 13, 14. From these texts the duty is as plain as any duty which is taught in the Bible. Ministers ought to be relieved from worldly cares and embarrasments ; for they have enough to do in the discharge of the duties of their office, without being encumbered with these ; and it is tlieir duty according to the injunction of the word of Godj LUTIES OF MINISTERS AND PEOPLE. 243 to give themselves wholly to those things which pertain to the ministerial work. 6. Once more, it is the duty of people to pray for their minister. This also is a duty frequently taught in the Scriptures. Paul in the most solemn manner besought the Romans that they would pray for him. " Now, I be- seech you, brethren, for the Lord Jesus Christ's sake, and for the love of the Spirit, that ye strive together with me in your prayers to God for me." Rom. xv. 30. He exhor- ted the Ephesians " praying always, with all prayer, and supplication in the Spirit &;c. And for me that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly to make known the mystery of the gospel." Eph. vi. 18,19. To the Colossians he wrote, "praying also for us, that God would open unto us a door of utterance, to speak the mystery of Christ." Col. iv. 3. The same request he made of the Thessalonians and the Hebrews. *' Brethren pray for us." Thus earnestly did Paul seek the prayers of christians. And if he who was an apostle and divinely inspired felt their prayers to be of so much im- portance, most assuredly ministers in the present day have need of the prayers of their people, and it is their duty to pray for their minister; and this is their interest as well as their duty ; for their prayers will tend to procure di- vine assistance for their minister, and thus he will be en- abled better, and more usefully to his people, to perform his duty. And now in view of this subject let minister and peo- ple examine themselves, whether they have performed the duties of the relation which they sustain to each other. Wherein we have come short and transgressed, let us be humbled. And let us set ourselves more faithfully to per- form our duty. The relation which we bear to each other is a very important one, and the manner in which we perform its duties, will have a solemn bearing on our final account- Let us ever keep this account in view, and let it influence our conduct in this, and all the other relations of life.-- Amen. SERMON LXXVIf. THE SIXTH COMMANDMENT. EXODUS XX. 13. " Thou shalt not kilV All the commandments of God show, that while he aims at his own glory, he also seeks the best happiness of his creatures. Hence sin, which is a transgression of the divine commandments, while it is rebellion against the au- thority of God, is at the same time opposed to the best interests of men ; and the man who is in any way instru- mental in promoting a spirit of disobedience to the com- mandments of God, is ap enemy to human happiness. An attentive consideration of all the commandments will prove the truth of these remarks. And they are espe- cially forcibly proved by the commandment which at present claims our consideration. " Thou shalt not kill." For this commandment regards the dearest temporal in- terest of man, viz. his life. We shall in the ensuing discourse — I. Take a brief view of what is required by this com- mandment. II. Consider some of the sins forbidden. I. What is required in the sixth commandment. The answer to this question we have contained in our catechism, question 64. " The sixth commandment reqnircth all lawful endeavours to preserve our own life, and the life of others.'''' With respect to our own lives it requires, that we avoid presumptuously rushing into danger, or putting our lives in peril, unless duty calls us to it ; that when our lives are threatened by otliers, we use all lawful means to a- void the threatened danger, and if necessary and lawful defend ourselves against their murderous designs ; that "we avoid all those practices which tend to injure our THE StXTH COMMANDMENT. 245 health, and eventually to shorten our lives *, ancl also that we use those thmgs which are necessciry for the support of nature, and the preservation of health, and also lor the restoration of health when it is impaired ; such as meat, drink, sleep, labour, recreation, and medicine. With respect to the lives of others we are in duty bound, by this commandment, according to our places and op- portunities to dissuade others from those courses, which tend to impair their health, and eventually to shorten their lives ; to endeavour to prevent them from laying vio- lent hands upon themselves, and taking away their own lives, by an act of suicide ; to discover to them secret plots which may be laid against their lives, by others, when known to us ; to defend them when it is in our pow- er, against the assaults of others ; and to administer to their necessities, when they may be suffering, and in dan- ger of perishing through want, even though they be our enemies. But while it is our duty to preserve our own lives, and the lives of others, we may remark that we ought to use none, but lawful endeavours. With respect to others, it would be wrong to conceal one who had forfeited his lite, by transgressing the righteous laws of the land, and pre-, vent the course of justice. It would be wrong to prevent justice from taking place, to the condemnation of such an one, or to rescue him by stratagem or by force. And with respect to our own lives, it would be wrong to violate our consciences to save them ; as in times of persecution, when the christian is called, either to deny Christ or suf- fer death ; in such a case he is to lay down his life r ither than deny Christ. This is abundantly taught in the Scrip- tures; and is confirmed by the example of a cloud of wit-^ nesses, whose conduct is approved in the word of God, who " w^ere tortured, not accepting doliv(Tnnce ;" Heb. xi. 35 ; and who cheerfully resigned their lives rather than wound their consciences. — We proceed, II. To consider the sins forbidden in the sixth com- mandment. According to our catechism, question G5, " The sixth commandment forbiddcth the taking away of our own life., or the life of our neighbour unjustly., and wlmtsoevcr tendeth thereunto.'''' This answer consists of three parts, viz. : 246 SERMON LXXVII. 1. Suicide, or taking away of our own lives. 2. Taking away the lives of others unjustly. And 3. Whatsoever tends to the destruction of our own lives, or the lives of others. In the remainder of this discourse, your attention is in- vited to a consideration of the two former. And, 1. The taking away of our own lives. This is denomina- ted suicide or self-murder^ and is directly forbidden by this commandment. "Thou shalt not kill." This when com- mitted by persons not void of reason is a very grievous sin. It is assuming a right over our lives which belongs only to God, or to those to whom he may give it. It is contrary to the first law of nature, implanted within us by the Author of our being, viz. self-preservation. It ar- gues a high degree of discontent and impatience under the hand of God, and a determined unwillingness to sub- mit to his providential dispensations. It is a bold and presumptuous withdrawing from the scene of labour and of duty, which God has prescribed, before our work gis done. It is listening and giving place to the devil, who tempts men to this rash deed, and obeying him rather than God. It is a presumptuous rushing uncalled to the awful bar of God. And it is in express violation of the command of God, and leaves generally no space for re- pentance. This deed must therefore, unless when com- mitted by a person so deranged as not to be a moral a- gent, or accountable for his actions, be a most heinous sin. Thus it has been esteemed by those countries gen- erally, on which the light of the gospel has shone ; and thus the word of God considers it, which declares that " no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him ;" 1 John iii. 15. From these observations, some may perhaps be ready to ask, do all self-murderers perish ? I answer, if they truly repent of their sin, they shall be saved as well as oth- er penitents ; and it is a possible case that the self mur- derer may give himself his death wound, and survive long enough to become sensible of his crime and repent of it. But most generally, all opportunity for repentance is cut off. And further as has been already hinted, if a person commits this act in a state of derangement, as a person deprived of the exercise of his reason cannot be account- able for his actions, he cannot be accountable for this THE SIXTH COMMANDMENT. 247 deed ; and therefore suicide in such a case cannot afleci a person's future state. Let all guard against this awful deed. And that none of us may be left to terminate our lives in this way, let us avoid those courses which lead to this fatal end. Every thing which wounds the conscience, and therefore every evil course may lead to this end ; for a wounded spirit, who can bear ? Let us therefore endeavour to keep con- sciences void of offence. The sin of gambling, which ir- ritates the passions and often destroys estate, is not unfre- quently a cause of suicide. So also are all those vices which are branded with infamy by the world, and which when known fix an indelible stain on a man's character. If therefore we fear suicide, let us fear and guard against such sins as have led others to the commission of this crime. Another frequent cause is an eager grasping af- ter ihe things of this world, and a fond attachment to them. When such persons are disappointed, and crossed in their pursuits, or meet with heavy losses, they are filled with vexation and sorrow, sometimes so insupportable, that they rush into the arms of death, to rid themselves, as they falsely suppose, of their troubles. This is em- phatically " the sorrow of the world" which " worketh death :" 2 Cor. vii. 10. This love of the world is in itself a very great sin, and is productive of many other sins ; and is especially one of the most fruitful sources of the sin of suicide. If therefore we fear self-murder, let us guard against this pitiable, degrading, wicked, and I may add detestable love of tlie world, to such a degree as to be glued as it were to it. Let us sensible of our own weakness, seek and secure an interest in Christ, who is able to keep us. Let us daily trust in him, and daily pray, " lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil." We proceed, 2. To consider this commandment as forbidding the taking away of the lives of others^ unjusthj. We say unjustly because, it is right sometin.es to take the hfe of others. I mention three cases in which I suppose it to be just, and which are to be considered as excepted in the general law, '• Thou shalt not kill." The cases are these. Life may be taken away by the civil magistrate ; in lawful war; and in necessary self-defence. Let us distinctly consid- er *^ach of these ca^e-^". 248 SERMON LXXVli. 1. It is lawful for the civil magistrate to take away liffe. This is especially true in the case of wilful murder. Whether the divine law warrants it in any other case I shall not undertake at present to discuss. It is at least , doubtful. And the moral right of the civil magistrate to take away the life of even the wilful murderer has been denied by some. But this right is evident from the word of God, in which the civil magistrate is authorized and commanded to do it. And no rulers have a right to enact Jaws, dispensing with the divine law in this matter. If we look into the Jewish code of laws, given by God him- self, we shall find frequent commandments on this head : as in the following texts, Ex. xxi. 12, 14 : " He that smi- teth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death. If a man come presumptuously upon his neighbour, to slay him with guile ; thou shalt take him from mine altar, that he may die." Lev. xxi v. 17 ; "He that killeth any man shall surely be put to death." And in the appoint- ment of cities of refuge, of which we read in the 35th chapter of Numbers, to which the manslayer who had killed another by accident, or without design, might flee and be safe, special care was taken that the wilful mur- derer should receive no benefit from the provision, but in case he escaped into one of these cities, he w^as to be brought thence and put to death. In the same chapter it is repeated a number of times, " the murderer shall surely be put to death." And we also read, " Whoso killeth any person, the murderer shall be put to death by the mouth of witnesses. Moreover, ye shall take no satisfac- tion for the life of a murderer, which is guilty of death : but he shall be surely put to death. So ye shall not pol- lute the land wherein ye are ; for blood it defileth the land: and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it." And this law that the murderer should be punished with death was not peculiar to the Jews, nor did it belong to the ceremonial code, which was to be done away un- der the gospel dispensation ; but it was strictly moral, and intended to be binding on all nations and all ages ; for it was given long before the ceremonial law , and long before the nation of the Jews had existence. It was giv- en by God to Noah, the flither of the w orld since the flood ; as we read, Gen ix. 6 ; " Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed." THE SIXTH COMMANDMENT, 249 2. We proceed to consider the second exception to the general law, viz. Imvful war. And here a question will a- rise, whether any war is authorized by the divine law ? On this question there have been different and contrary opinions. With diffidence, I would answer the question in the affirmative. It is true there are many wars which are highly wicked in the sight of God ; such are all those which are undertaken to gratify the pride, ambition, re- venge, or avarice of kings, or rulers. And from such cau- ses have most of the wars proceeded, which have scourged and desolated our world. But Vv^hen one nation is attack- ed by another, what is the injured nation to do, if they have not a right to defend themselves and repel force by force ? The principle of self-preservation, undoubtedly implanted within us by the Author of our being, teaches us that such defence would be right. Besides there is no other way of maintaining the rights of a nation against an unjust, oppressive, and invading foe. Among individuals, the civil law maintains the rights of each. But there is no such way to maintain the rights of nations, and pre- vent one from injuring and destroying another; and hence, if it be right for nations to maintain their rights, it is right to defend them when invaded by opposing force to force. These remarks go to justify defensive war, when im- portant rights cannot otlierwise be maintained. We may further remark, that what may be called offensive war, may perhaps also in some cases be lawful ; for such provocations may possibly be offered by one nation to an- other, as that the safety and tranquillity of the nation re- ceiving the provocations may require them, without delay, to commence hostilities. This however is properly a de- fensive war. It is true, war arises from sin, and is one of the conse- quences of the fall ; and if nations were universally actu- ated by the principles of justice and charity, wars would cease ; and we believe that the time will come, when ac- cording to the predictions of prophecy, wars and rumours of wars will cease, and the nations will learn war no more, but beat their swords into plough-shares, and their spears into pruning-hooks. But notwithstanding this, that there are just wars, appears not only from the right which na- tions have to maintain their rights, but also from the Scriptures, in which we read of many wars begun and VOL. ii„ 32 250 SERMON LXXVII. carried on by divine direction. War, therefore, in cer- tain cases is lawful, and consequently it is lawful in thie way to take life. But at the same time, war ought not to be engaged in, if it can be avoided, consistently with the rights of nations. Every possible means ought first to be used to heal differences, and prevent bloodshed. And when war is unavoidable and must be engaged in, the object ought to be not to gratify a spirit of revenge, but to bring our enemies to respect our rights ; and it ought to be conducted with humanity, and all cruelty be sed- uously avoided. 3. Another case in which it is lawful to take away life is for individual self-defence. When a person is actually attacked by another, with the intention to take his life, it is certainly lawful, if he can in no other way preserve his own life, to slay the assassin. That this is right ie taught by that natural principle, and first law of nature, self preservation. And it is confirmed by the following text, Ex. xxii. 2 ; " If a thief be found breaking up, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him." But here it will be proper to remark, that it ie lawful in self-defence to take away the life of another on- ly for the preservation of our own lives ; and this too*, when we are actually assaulted, and when we can dis- cover no other way to save ourselves. In these three cases, viz. pubhc justice, lawful war, and necessary self-defence, it is lawful to take aw ay life, but in every other case the taking away of life is contrary to the sixth commandment. Murder is the greatest crime which we can commit a- gainst our neighbour, as it deprives him of his most valua- ble temporal property — his life, and w ith it every tempo- ral enjoyment. This crime, in itself very great, may be much aggrava- ted by circumstances. If it be the effect of deliberate premeditation; if it be accompanied with acts of cruelty ; if it be committed against the unoffending and the help- less ; if the life of the mm-dered be valuable, and import- ant to church or state ; and if it be against one connect- ed by the ties of blood or affinity, such as a brother or sis- ter, a parent or child, or a husband or wife — these and such like circumstances greatly enhance the guilt of this crime. THE SIXTH COMMANDMENT. 251 Murder is a most heinous sin in the sight of God. Tliis he has shown, by directing that the severest of human punishments should be inlhcted upon the murderer, even death. " Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed ;" Gen. ix. 6. " Ye shall take no satisfac- tion for the life of a murderer, whicli is guilty of death i but he shall be surely put to death ;" Num. xxxv. 31. He has also shown his marked abhorrence of this crime, by following murderers and their posterity with his judg- ments, where they have escaped human punishments ; and even visiting whole communities, with judgments for this sin, where the person who committed it had been suflered to escape with impunity. Thus David after the murder of Uriah was visited with judgment after judgment ; and the Lord declared that for this deed the sword should never depart from his house. Thus the land of Israel was visited with a three year's famine in the time of Da- vid for Saul's murder of the Gibeonites. And the mur- ders which the Jews had committed on the prophets of former ages, were visited on that generation which lived in the time of our Saviour. God has further shown his abhorrence of this crime, by the terrors and remorse with ■which he has frequently filled those who have committed it, before they have been legally convicted of it, and by leading in his providence to the discovery of murderers who had long been concealed. History furnishes us with many instances, of the discovery of murderers, who had long escaped detection ; and this too in a way, which most forcibly indicated the peculiar providence of God in ef- fecting the discovery. All these things show the exceed- irigly heinous nature of this sin. Under the head of murder we must include, taking a- way the life of an antagonist in a ducl^ or single combat. It is murder in the sight of heaven. It is a direct violation of the sixth commandment, " Thou shalt not kill." It comes under the description of murder against which death is denounced in many other texts. Such are the following, " Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed. The duellist who kills his antagonist sheds man's blood, and therefore by man should his blood be shed. " He that smiletli a man that he die shall be surely put to death. He that killeth any man shall sure- ly be put to death. Whoso killeth any person, the muf- 252 SERMON LXXVII. derer shall be put to death." These and other similar texts unquestionably embrace the duellist, and make him a murderer, worthy of death. And he is not only a mur- derer, but one in an aggravated degree ; for he sets him- self to execute his purpose of death, after time for cool and deliberate reflection. And the duellist is not only chargeable in the sight of heaven, with the murder of his antagonist in fact, if he succeed in killing him, and in in- tention if he fail ; but he is also chargeable with self- murder, by wilfully and unnecessarily exposing his own life; and if he fall he goes to the bar of God as a delib- erate self-murderer. The practice of duelling originated among the barba- rous Gothic nations in the dark ages. But the Gothic duellist drew not his sword for the gratification of private revenge, as is the case in modern times. Though a bar- barian he was actuated by far nobler motives. He drew his sword for the defence of the injured, the weak and oppressed, and he believed the contest to be a religious appeal to the providence of God to attest innocence or to decide the point of right. He was in an error, and was guilty of a breach of the sixth commandment. Much more then the modern duellist, who does not pretend to be actuated by motives of religion, and who seldom has the plea of the protection of the innocent, the helpless, and the oppressed. The modern practice of duelling is marked with both consummate folly and guilt, and it is a violation of the plainest principles both of reason and revelation. Its folly might be shown from the unreasonableness and ab- surdity of the pleas which are madein its defence. Time will not permit us to enter upon the consideration of these. We shall only make a few brief remarks, in con- firmation of the guilt of this practice. In addition to the consideration already mentioned that it is a violation of the sixth commandment, and of all those texts of Scrip- ture which prohibit, under pain of death, the taking away the life of another, we may remark, it strikes at the funda- mental principles of civil society ; for the dueUist asserts his right to be the umpire in his own cause, and the aven- ger himself of the injuries he has received. Every man is equally entitled to the same right; and what would be the consequence of such a principle in universal opera- THE SIXTH COMMAND>rENT. 253 tion, but the destruction of government, and universal an- archy? This practice is also not only at war with the general principles of society, but it is, in our country, a violation of positive laws, and therefore a breach of the law of God which requires us to he subject to every ordinance of man which does not interfere with the rights of con- science. It is also condemned by all those numerous passages of Scripture which inculcate, compassion, long- suflering, forgiveness and the like dispositions. It is al- so directly contrary to the examples of the saints which are recorded for our imitation, and of Christ who when he was reviled, reviled not again, and who prayed for his enemies, " Father forgive them, they know not what they do." And further, this practice oftentimes entails the most serious and la'sting injuries on the friends of those w4io engage in it. If the person who falls has friends, their hearts are wrung with inexpressilde agony, an incurable wound is often inliicted, the world is made a blank, and an untimely grave often terminates a life thus made wretched. And in addition to all these reasons against this practice, I repeat it, the duellist is guilty of deliberate, wilful murder, and though he may escape hu- man punishment, he must shortly answer for the crime of murder at the bar of God. I trust it is scarcely necessary to endeavour to impress upon my hearers, a sense of the evil nature of murder of every kind, or in whatever way it may be committed.— I would only in the conclusion of this discourse exhort you as you fear the commission of this crime with all its direful consequences, both in this world and the next, to guard againt the indulgence of those passions from which this vice proceeds, such as anger, hatred, malice, envy, revenge, and the like. Tliese passions are totally opposed to the spirit of the gospel, which inculcates, " love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, goodness,meekness;" and the ymay lead to the most dreadful consequences, eveu the murder of their object. This they have often done.— Shudder then at the thought of cherishing them. Ban- ish them from your breasts, and cultivate the contrary temper. — Amen. SERMON LXXVIII DRUNKENNESS. ISAIAH V. 11. " Wo unto them that rise up early in the morning, that they may follow strong drink, that continue until nighty till nine in- flame them.''^ In these words the sin of intemperate drinking is condem- ned. This vice is a breach of the sixth commandment, which forbids not only the direct taking away of our own life, or the hfe of others, but " whatsoever tendeth there- unto." And drunkenness by gradually impairing the con- stitution, and causing disease, tends to shorten a man's own life ; and not unfrequently does his conduct so affect and injure his near relatives as to shorten also their days. — This sin is also a breach of several of the other com- mandments. It is a breach of the first, as the drunkard makes his cups his chief good, and therefore his God. It is a breach of the fifth, as it unfits a man for the perfor- mance of his relative duties, and generally leads to the violation of them all. It is a breach of the eighth, which respects, his own, and his neighbour's wealth and out- ward estate, as it tends to impair his estate, and reduce himself and family to poverty, and unfits him to provide for them. And it is also a breach of the ninth command- ment, which relates to character, as its effect is to lessen a man's reputation. Under either of these commandments we might treat of this vice. Drunkenness may be defined to be, a state, in which the mental faculties are either partially or totally deranged, and the bodily powers weakened, from the excessive use of spirituous liquors. This is a sin against which it is important that a war- ning voice should he frequently raised. For it prevails jn our land, and is eminently productive of the most un- happy consequences, even tiie destruction of thousands both as to body and soul, DRUNKENNESS. 255 My object in the ensuing discourse is to point out the evils, the causes, and the remedies or preventives of the sin oi drunkenness. I. Its evils. And • 1. \iinjures and destroys ?i m^VL^^ character. It deprives a person of the due exercise of his reason. This must lessen his character, in the estimation of all persons who feel a regard for the dignity of human nature. Besides, a person intoxicated is in danger of committing many foolish and disgraceful actions, which must necessarily lessen his character. Drunkenness is an inlet to almost every other vice ; and a person intoxicated is in a fit state to run into any excess of folly and wickedness. The fact is that this crime always has been and still is held in disgrace, and the loss of character is its inseparable con- sequent. In the Scriptures, infamy among men is attach- ed to the character ofa drunkard. When Eli supposed Haimah to be drunken, and charged her with it, she an- swered " Count not thine handmaid for a daughter of Be- lial." 1 Sam. i. 16. Now a son or daughter of Behal in Scripture signifies the vilest of men or women. And Paul wrote to the Corinthians (1 Cor. v. 11,) "not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother, be a drunkard — with such an one, no not to eat." Among the Spartans, it is said, this vice was considered so disgrace- ful, that they brought their children to loathe it by show- ing them a drunkard, at whom they gazed as at a monster. And history informs us that parents among the ancient Romans, to guard their children against this vice, caused one of their slaves to be made intoxicated, and then ex- posed him to the view and ridicule of the assembled fami- ly, that an indelible impression of the disgracefulness of the crime might be made upon them. But we need not refer to other countries and other ages for proofs that this vice is injurious to a man's character; for we doubtless have ourselves known many who once were respected, whose reputation has been lessened and destroyed by this sin. 2. The vice of drunkenness impairs the mental faculties, " Though this (says a medical writer* of Europe) be not the consequence of one act of intoxication, it seldom fails *Dr. Bachan. 256 SERMON LXXVlir. to succeed a course of it. By a habit of drinking, tbc greatest genius is often reduced to a mere ideot." And a late celebrated physician* of our own country has given his opinion as follows, "It impairs the memory, debihtates the understanding, and perverts the moral faculties." And another writerf of our own country has said, '" If a man falls under the power of intemperance as a habit, the understanding gradually becomes torpid, thememoryand allother faculties of the mind sink into a mopish inactivi- ty, till at last, he becomes exactly that useless and con- temptible creature described in one comprehensive syl- lable— a sot." Our own observation brethren will fur- nish abundant proof to convince us of the truth of these remarks. 3. Another evil of this sin is it injures, and often ruins a man's estate. The maxims of the wise man are still true — " He that loveth wine and oil shall not be rich." Prov. xxi. 17. "The drunkard and the glutton shall come to pover- ty." Prov. xxiii. 21. Diminution of property is the al- most sure, and inseparable consequence of habitual in- temperance. For besides the expense necessary to sup- port this vice, much time is lost, property is frequently wasted for want of care, and bad bargains are frequently made. All of which must necessarily waste estate. That poverty is the natural consequence of this vice, we must be convinced from our own observation. For we have seen persons by it, reduced from easy and even affluent circumstances to penury. And we have often seen per- sons already pot>r, k^pt so by this vice ; when by sobrie- ty and industry they might have gained a comfortable livelihood. — " The drunkard's account (says onef) is commonly a short one. Business neglected, foolish bar- gains contracted, credit ruined, land, house, and furni- ture mortgaged, and then the sheriff and the prison stand ready to close up the reckoning." 4. Another evil of drunkenness is that it brings mlserif ^jpon innocent families. It injures their character. For the world, though unjustly, is apt, in a measure, to esti- mate the respectability of persons from their friends, and especially of children from their parents. It acutely wounds the feelings of a family. The shame and pain •Dr. Rush, t Rev. Dr. E. Porter. J Rev. Dr. E, Porter. DRUNKENNESS. 257 which they often feel to see a husband or wife, or parent or child, thus debased, and rushing to ruin, are inexpres- sible. Furtlier this vice may have, and doubtless often does have, the most pernicious influence on the morals of a family. We often see children follow the example which a parent has set them in this respect. And even if it should not have this unhappy effect, this vice must lessen a parent's dignity in the eyes of his children and their esteem for him, and thus render him unfit to do the duty of a parent — to train up his children in the way that they should go. But these are not all the injuries which families receive from this vice : the mischief frequently extends further. Drunkards often injure their families by abusive words, and sometimes by blows. Of this, many families can doubtless bear witness. Yea the lives of families have sometimes been put in jeopardy, and they have been obliged to seek safety by flight. And further, the want of the necessaries of life, is anotherof the serious train of evils which this vice brings upon families. Look into prisons where debtors are confined, while their families at home are reduced to distress, and you will find all this distress frequently occasioned by intemperance. Go to the houses where by an execution for debt, families are stripped of the necessaries of life, without even a bed left on which to lie; inquire into the cause, and you will fre- quently find that intemperate drinking has done this. Go to our alms-houses and our poor lists, and inquire into the reason why those here found are reduced to the neces- sity of being supported by the public charity ; and you doubtless will frequently find that intemperance, either in themselves or friends, has done this. But I forbear. The evils which result to families from this vice are almost in- numerable, and beyond description. 5. Another evil of drunkenness is, it injures healthy and if persisted in must finally destroy the strongest constitution. In confirmation of this permit me to make a quotation from a medical writer* of Europe. '• Every act of intoxi- cation (says he) puts nature to tlie expense of a fever in order to discharge the poisonous draught. When this is repeated, almost every day, it is easy to foresee the con- *Dr. Bucban. VOL. I J. '^'^ 258 SERMON LXXVIII. sequences. That constitution must be strong indeed, which is able long to hold out under a daily fever. — These fevers frequently end in inflammations which pro- duce fatal effects. Though a drunkard should not fall by an acute disease, he seldom escapes those of a chronic kind — paralytic and convulsive disorders, obstructions, a- trophies, dropsies, and consumptions of the lungs. — These are the common ways in which drunkards make their exit." *An eminent physician of our own country after enumerating a list of stubborn diseases as the effects of this vice adds, " It would take up a volume to describe how much other disorders, natural to the human bodj", are increased and complicated by it." And he gives it as his opinion, that " not less than 4,000 people die annual- ly, from the use of ardent spirits, in the United States." — To these sentiments of the injurious consequences of drunkenness to health, physicians in general will doubt- less, bear their testimony. And they who have for any considerable time observed the fate of persons addicted to this vice, must from their own observation be convin- ced of the correctness of these remarks. What a dread- ful consequence of intemperance is this! The drunkard is a self-murderer ! He as surely is the author of his own death as the man who takes his life, by a single act of violence; and at the har of God he must as surely an- swer for the crime of suicide. Further, the drunkard not only injures his health and shortens his life, in the way which has been pointed out, by impairing his consti- tution, and laying the foundation of disease ; but he expo- ses his life to be cut off by accidents, which while in a fit of intoxication, he is unable to to see or avoid. Many have in this state been suddenly cut off by a violent death, and thus have awakened from their drunken slum- bers, at the bar of their final judge. And to all this we may add, that this vice is one of the most fruitful causes of those crimes which issue in capital punishments. — Judge Rush, in a charge to a grand jury of Pennsylvania says : " I declare in this public manner, and with the most solemn regard to truth, that I do not recollect an instance since my being concerned in the administra- tion of justice, of a single person being put on his trial •Dr. Rush. DRUNKENNESS. 259 for manslaughter, which did not originate in drunkenness; and but tew instances of trials lor murder, where the crime did not spring from the same unhappy cause." 0. Finally, to crown the catalogue of evils, this vice if continued in will dcstroii the soul forever. God has in his word frequently prohibited it, and enjoined the contrary virtue. '• Add to your faith, virtue ; and to virtue, knowl- edge, and to kiiowledge, temperance^ 2 Pet. i. 5, 6. ^' The grace of God that bringeth salvation, hath appeared to all men; teaching us, that denying ungodliness, and world- ly lusts, we should Wwe soberly ^ Tit. ii. 11, 12. "Be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess." Eph. v. 18. "Let us walk honestly as in the day ; not in rioting and drunkenness." Rom. xiii. 13. " Take heed to your- ielves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and so that day come upon you unawares." Luk. xxi. 31, Such are the laws of God. And will he not punish the wilful and ha- bitual transgressor of his laws } He assuredly will. Accordingly he hath pronounced woes upon those who are addicted to this vice, and hath expressly excluded them from his kingdom." " Wo to the drunkards of E- phraim." Is. xxviii. 1. And in our text. " Wo unto them that rise up early in tlie morning that they may follow strong drink, that continue until night, till wine inilame them." " Be not deceived ; neither fornicators &lc. nor drunkards, shall inherit the kino;dom of God." 1 Cor. vi, 9,10. "The works of the ilesh are manifest which are these, adultery &c. drunkenness, of the wlilch I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God." Gal. v. 19,21. In these passages the drunkard may see his doom. It is impossible for him while he sustains this character to enter the kingdom of God. And he must be an heir of eternal misery. Thus my hearers I have brief- ly described to you some of the fatal consequences, here and hereafter, of the sin of intemperance. To what has been said under this head, permit me to add the words of Solomon. Prov. xxiii. 29, 30, 31, 32, 34. "Who hath wo } Who hath sorrow } Who hath contention } Who hath babbling } Who hath wounds without cause .'^ Who hath redness of eyes ? They that tarry long at the wine, they that go to seek mixt wine. Look not thou upon the 260 SERMON LXXVllI. wine when it is red, when it giveth his colour in the cup, when it moveth itself aright. At the last it biteth like a serpent, and stingeth like an adder. Yea thou shalt be as he that lieth down in the midst of the sea, or as he that lieth upon the top of a mast." We proceed, II. To inquire into some of the causes that lead to this destructive vice. 1. The example and conduct of some parents^ have led their children into this vice. Children are prone to im- itate the example of parents ; and doubtless example in this respect has often had a pernicious influence, and has been the cause of intemperance in many children. Pa- rents also, sometimes indulge their children, when young, in the free use of spirituous liquors, until a love for them is contracted. They also, sometimes are not sufficiently careful to restrain them from places, and company, where they are in danger of contracting this habit. 2. An opinion that spirituous liquors, 'are Jiecessary to brace the system^ and strengthen it to bear bodily labour and fatigue, has frequently been the cause of producing a habit of intemperance. If a little be useful, which how- ever has been denied by the most eminent physicians, it had need to be taken with great caution lest a habit is in- duced. For if it be established as a principle that a man cannot labour without it, and that every time he feels wea- ry he must take some to invigorate him, the consequence will be that a habit of intemperance will almost certainly be soon formed. 3. Another cause which sometimes leads to intemper- ance is, at first using spirituous liquors as a medicine. " I have known (says Dr. Rush) many men and women of ex- cellent characters and principles, who have been betrayed by occasional doses, taken as a medicine, into the love of spirituous liquors, insomuch that they have afterwards fallen sacrifices to their fatal eflfects." 4. Another frequent cause is evil company. This has led astray many promising youth, and ruined them, both for this world and the next. They have fallen into jovial company, where strong drink was freely used ; and where they have been urged to partake ; and if they declined or drank sparingly, they were ridiculed as void of spirit. Unable to bear the reproach of tools, they yielded. They went away ashamed, resolved never again to act thus a- DRUNKENNESS. '261 gainst their judgment and conscience. Temptation wasa- gain presented ; their scruples were more easily overcome ; and thus hy degress the warning voice of conscience has been stilled, and many have contracted a habit of intem- perance and ruined themselves forever. 5. Another cause has sometimes been, the troubles of this life. Many have had recourse to the intoxicating bowl to drown their cares and their sorrows, and thus have brought upon themselves one of the greatest of afflictions which could befall them. I'here are other causes which we have not time to no- tice. But, 6. There is one which holds a prominent place, which I feel it to be my indispensable duty, while on this subject, to mention. I mean the many tippling houses which are to be found in our land. These are the most fruitful causes of the destructive vice of intemperance, which is annually destroying the peace and happiness of numerous famihcs, bringing thousands to an untimely grave, and sending mul- titudes to the bottomless pit. The banelul influence of these houses appears from the anxiety which our Legisla- ture has discovered to suppress them, by enacting laws against them; and it also appears from their effects which we are forced to behold. Concerning these houses one of the chief magistrates of a neighbouring state remarks. " These are the polluted fountains that send forth con- stant streams to corrupt and demoralize the people. — Here our youth the growing hopes of their country, are initiated in all the mysteries of iniquity, and lay the foun- dation of those destructive habits that never forsake them." I proceed to the III. Thing proposed, which was to point out the reme- dies and preventives of the vice of intemperance. — As to remedies, to cure the habit in those in whom it has become confirmed, we have but little hoj)e indeed that any can be pointed out which will prove effectual This remark, painful as it is, we are compelled to make from facts ; for rarely indeed do we see the drunkard forsake his cups. This vice perhaps more than any other, blinds the mind, hardens the heart, sears the conscience, and unfits a person for serious reflection. And drunkards in- deed seem to be given up oftiod, to walk for a little while in their own ways, and follow tiieir own heart's lusts, and 262 feERMON LXXVIII. exhil)it hmiian depravity, until they d^'op into the pit. We have httle hope from pointing out remedies. I would only ohserve on this subject, that if persons addicted to this vice wish to reform, I believe it is in vain to attempt a gradual reformation ; they must break off at once, and inscribe, " touch not, taste not, handle not," on every thing which contains the poisonous draught. But while remedies, we have reason to fear, will be of little avail, preventives may be of use to save those who have not yet become habituated to this vice. As the grand preventive let us seek and cherish the grace of God in our hearts; this will be the best means of preserving us from falling into this destructive sin ; and let us sincerely and daily, feeling our own weakness, offer up the petition, "lead us not into temptation but de- liver us from evil." Let us shun all those causes which have been mentioned as producing this vice. Let us deeply reflecton its evils, both in time and eternity, as they have been pointed out ; and let us set these evils con- stantly before us when we are tempted to this sin. Let those who are holding out temptations to this vice, and furnishing the means, cease from their unlawful and mur- derous gain. Let all, according to their stations, do all that is in their power, by their example, their opinions, their influence, and their authority, to restrain others from this vice, and remove the causes which lead to it. And let those who find themselves, begiiining to love and thirst after the intoxicating draught, immediately deny themselves, and destroy the habit in its first commence- ment. This, if ever, is the time to escape the destructive snare. E\ ery advance strengthens the habit and weak- ens resistance. Flee from the first approaches of this vice, while the voice of reason can yet be heard, as you would from the most dangerous enemy. Permit me in the conclusion of this discourse to address different classes of persons who maybe in this assembly. And if any subject requires plainness, this does. If a- gainst any sin it is my duty to cry aloud and spare not, it is this : for intemperance is the demon which is destroy- ing the peace and happiness of many famihes. It is this, which more than any thing else, deprives many innocent families of the necessaries of life ; it is this, which is ma- king many persons pests of society, and cumbcrers of the J DRUNKENNESS. 263 earth; and it is this, which annually murders the bodies and souls of many among us. Against sucli a vice, such a destructive demon as this, ministers ought to raise the alarm. If we found a man attempting to take his own life by an act of violence, would we not endeavour by ev- ery means in our power to prevent the rash and dreadful deed ^ If we ibund a thief or murderer attempting to take the property or life of our neighbour, would we not give the alarm ? And shall we not endeavour to prevent those, who though more slowly, yet as surely are in dan- ger of murdering themselves by intemperance ? Shall we not sound the alarm against that which is robbing them of their character, stripping their families of the necessa- ries of life, and murdering not only the body but the soul forever ? Are there any here addicted to this vice ? It is proba- ble but iew if any ; for this is generally one of the conse- quences of this vice, that it causes persons to withdraw themselves from the house of God. But if there be any, be exhorted I beseech you, without delay, to break off from this sin. Consider its evils whicli have been enu- merated, and let them operate as motives to lead you to immediate reformation. You are destroying your char- acter ; you are injuring your mental powers ; you are wasting your property ; you are covering your familj with shame ; you are distressing and reducing them to want and beggary, and perhaps you have already brought them into this state ; you are destroyino; your health, and swiftly hastening yourselves to an untime- ly grave ; you ere murdering your bodies, and stand cliargeable with self-nmrder in the sight of heaven, as surely as the unhappy wretch who ends his days by violence from his own hands ; and you are destrovins your souls, and must very soon it you continue your course awake in the world of woe, where instead of ad- ding drunkenness to thirst, you will cry in vain for a drop of water to cool your tormented tongue ; and where, in- stead of the intoxicating bowl, you will have given you to drink the wine of the wrath of Almighty God, which is poured out without mixture into tiie cup of his indigna- tion. Awful considerations ! will they not make you pause, and tremble, and immediately break ofTyour sin? What then will ? T]"nhappy soul, we can but pity and weep over you. 264 SERMON LXXVIII. Mj hearers, who are not yet addicted to this vice, I turn to you and beseech you by all these solemn considera- tions to guard against every approach to this sin. And my brethren is it not the duty of us all, by every means in our power, to endeavour to prevent the growth of this vice ? Shall we stand idle spectators, and see use- fulness destroyed, property wasted, famihes made wretch- ed, fellow creatures and neighbours and friends murder- ing themselves, and their souls sinking to endless woe, and take no measures to prevent all this wretchedness ? Let those who are in the habit of retailing spirituous liquors, to those who thus abuse them, and suffer it to be drunk in their shops, reflect seriously on this subject. Can you do this without guilt ? The breach of the laws of your country is a breach of the law of God. But this is not all. This practice, doubtless, greatly encourages and increases intemperance : it takes from many families the means of procuring the necessaries of life ; it impairs and destroys domestic happiness ; it swells the list of our poor, to be supported at the pubHc expense ; and it is conspiring with other causes, to bring many to an untime- ly grave, and to destroy their souls forever. And can any of you, my hearers, uphold a practice fraught with so many and such great evils as these ? Can any who fear God, and regard the good of their fellow creatures con- tinue such a practice ? Hear what the word of God says, " neither be partaker of other men's sins ;" 1 Tim. v. 22. "Wo unto him that giveth his neighbour drink : that put- test thy bottle to him, and makest him drunken also ;" Hab. ii. l.*). These texts apply directly to the case be- fore us. My hearers if any of you are in this practice, I solemnly exhort and charge you, as you would not have the cries of the poor, the widow and the fatherless to go up to heaven against you ; as you regard the favour of God ; and as you would not have to answer at his bar for being an accessory to the murder of the bodies and the souls of men, cease from this practice. Parents, this subject also addresses you. By example and by precept endeavour early to impress your children with an abhorrence of the sin of drunkenness ; guard them against every approach to it ; and especially keep them from the places and company, where they will be exposed to fpmptation. HATRED. 265 Let magistrates and all in authority, by their influence and by a faithful execution of the laws, stem this destruc- tive torrent which is overwhelming our land. The wick- ed may cry out against you ; but you will have the ap- plause of the virtuous, and the approbation of your own conscience and your God ; and the blessing of thousands, saved from ruin, w ill come upon you. May the Lord apply this discourse, and make it in- of good. — Amen. SERMON LXXIX. HATRED. / 1 JOHN ni. 15. " Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer : and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.^"* The law of God is exceeding broad. It reaches the soul and regulates its dispositions and exercises, as well as external bodily actions. "The law is spiritual;" Rom. vii. 14. This is applicable to all the commandments. They all may be broken without external actions. Hence, we may be guilty of a breach of the sixth commandment, without actually killing a person. Whosoever exerciseth murderous dispositions is a transgressor of this command- ment. This is clearly taught in our text. " Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer." And also, by our Sa- viour in his sermon on the mount, Mat. v. 21, 22 ; " Ye have heard that it was said by the m of old time, thou shalt not kill ; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment : But I say unto you, that whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in dan- ger of the judgment ; and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council : but whosoever shall say, thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire." VOL. II. 34 266 SERMON LXXIX. By brother^ in our text, we are to understand mankind generally, who are our brethren by nature. To hatred are nearly allied, anger, malice, wrath, revenge, and an unforgiving temper, all of which are breaches of the sixth commandment. We shall consider them together in the ensuing discourse, the object of which is. To offer reasons against the indulgence of these pas- sions. 1. Their indulgence is directly contrary to the character of God. The Supreme Being is a perfect pattern of ex- cellence. It is therefore the duty of all intelligent crea- tures to be conformed to the divine image, or to be like unto God ; and this duty is frequently enjoined in the Scriptures. Now, "God is love;" 1 Johniv. 8. Hatred, anger, malice, wrath, revenge, and the like, in the sense, in which they are forbidden to men in Scripture, are not to be found in God. Would we then be conformed to God ; we must put away all anger, and malice, and wrath, and hatred, and be kind, compassionate, and for- giving; and we must dwell in love ; for " he that dwelleth in love, dwelleth in God, and God in him ;" 1 John iv. 16. 2. These passions are opposed to the temper and example of Christ. Love to our fallen race influenced him to stoop to a union with our nature; to submit to poverty, re- proach, and persecution ; and to labour, suffer, and die. And if Christ so loved us, ought we not also to love one another ? His example is a perfect pattern, and therefore ought to be imitated by us ; and the Scriptures make it our duty to imitate his example. Now he felt no hatred to- wards our race, notwithstanding the wickedness of men and the continual ill treatment he received. He was of- ten grieved at the obstinacy of sinners, and the hardness of their hearts and he felt a holy indignation at their evil conduct ; but he was never angry in a sinful sense. When anger is ascribed to him, we must understand it either of grief or of holy indignation ; while at the same time, he pitied the object, and would willingly have done him good, if he would have received it. Malice never for a moment was found in his soul. Notwithstanding he re- ceived the most unjust and cruel treatment, and might have commanded twelve legions of angels to crush his en- emies, he avenged not himself but gave place unto wrath : yea, when he hung on the cross he prayed for his murder HATRED. 267 ers, saying, " Father, forgive them, for tliey know not what they do;" Luk. xxiii. 34 ; and he gave Iiis life a ran- som for the race which so cruelly treated him, and some of his very murderers were saved by the efficacy of the blood which they shed. This argument is used 1 y the apostle Peter. " Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps : — who when he was reviled, reviled not again ; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judg- eth righteously ;" 1 Pet. ii. 21, 23. Would we then fol- low the example of Christ, which it is our duty to imitate; we must avoid the indulgence of all those passions which have been mentioned, and be long-suffering, kind, and compassionate, forgive one another, and live in love. Es- pecially is this incumbent on professed christians, who avowedly take Christ as their pattern. 3. The example of the saints afford an argument against the indulgence of these passions. For we are exhorted to "be followers of them who through faith and patience, inherit the promises ;" Heb. vi. 12. Joseph, instead of hating his brethren, though they provoked his hatred ; and instead of revenging himself upon them, though he had them fully in his power, returned good for evil. Ste- phen, when his enemies were stoning him to death, kneel- ed down and prayed, " Lord, lay not this sin to their charge ;" Acts. vii. 60. And Paul speaking of himself and his fellow apostles said, " being reviled, we bless ; being persecuted we suffer it ; being defamed, we entreat ;" 1 Cor. iv. 12, 13. The same temper and conduct have been manifested, in the different ages of the church, by those of whom the world was not worthy, and who were persecu- ted even unto death. 4. Another argument against the indulgence of these passions, is, that lue have done much to offend God^ and yet ivc hope for his forgiveness and love. Shall we, for every trifle, be angry with our fellow creatures, and seek their hurt, when God is so patient and long-suffering towards us ? Can it be right to exercise hatred towards our brother, when we expect the Lord to exercise infinite love to- wards us } Is it not unreasonable, that we should be un- merciful and refuse to be kind and compassionate to our brother, when we are continually dependent on the mer- cy of God for every breath, every comfort of life, and 268 SERMON LXXIX. all our hopes of future salvation ? Is it not manifestly wrong that we should thirst for vengeance upon those, whom we suppose to have injured us, when we deserve every moment to have the vengeance of God fall upon us for our sins, and yet it is withheld ? Must it not be very wicked, to refuse to be reconciled to those with whom we are at variance, when God is wilHng to be reconciled un- to us, who are altogether the offending party, and gave his Son to die to render a reconciUation consistent with his perfections, and condescends to beseech us to be re- conciled ? And must it not be exceedingly offensive to God, that we should refuse to forgive our brother who hath trespassed against us ; when we have so much need of forgiveness from God, and when we have so much more to be forgiven than we can forgive ? Our brother's offen- ces against us, be they ever so great, bear a far smaller proportion to our offences against God, than the hundred pence to the ten thousand talents in the parable. And has our Lord forgiven, or do we hope he will forgive us, the ten thousand talents which we owe him ; and shall we refuse to forgive our brother the hundred pence which he may owe us ? Surely our situation with respect to God, and what we need and hope for from him, most for- cibly teach us *the duty of exercising a similar temper to- wards our brethren of mankind. 5. The Scriptures abundantly teach that the indulgence oHhese passions is wrong, and that men ought to maintain an opposite temper and conduct. They inculcate love, kindness, gentleness, peace, reconciliation, and forgive- ness of injuries ; as in the following texts among others, John xiii. 34. " A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another ; as I have loved you, that ye al- so love one another." John xv. 12; " This is my com- mandment, that ye love one another, as I have loved you." John XV. 17 ; "These things I command you, that ye love one another." ^ John iv. 21 ; "This commandment have we from him that he who loveth God, love his brother al- so. Rom.xii. 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21 ; " Be kindly affec- tioned one to another ; with brotherly love. Bless them which persecute you : bless and curse not. Recompense to no man evil for evil. If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men. Avenge not your- selves, but rather give place unto wrath. Be not over- HATRED. 269 come of evil, but overcome evil with good." Eph. iv. 1, 2, 3, 32 ; "I beseech you, that ye walk worthy of the vo- cation wherewith ye are called ; with all lowliness and meekness, with long-sufTerinsf, forbearing one another in love ; endeavouring to keep the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace. Be ye kind one to another, tender-heart- ed, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you." Col. iii. 12, 13 ; "Put on therefore (as the elect of God holy and beloved) bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, long-suflfering ; forbearing one another, and forgiving one another, if any man have a quarrel against any : even as Christ forgave you, so also do ye." Mat. v. 23, 24 ; •' If thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath aught against thee, leave there thy gift before the al- tar, and go thy vvay, first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift." Mat xviii. 21, 22 ; " Then came Peter to him and said, Lord, how oft shall my broth- er sin against me, and I forgive him ? till seven times ? Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee until seven times ; but, until seventy times seven." And Mat. v. 44 ; " I say unto you, love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them that despitefully use you, and persecute you." In these, and many other texts we are taught that it is our duty to ex- ercise love, compassion, gentleness, kindness, and long- suffering ; to live in peace ; to forgive those who have of- fended us ; and to be reconciled to those with whom we may be at variance. And in these are doubtless clearly implied, a prohibition to indulge the contrary passions of anger, hatred, and the like. But that the indulgence of these passions is wicked, we are taught, not only by those texts which inculcate a con- trary temper; but also by numerous texts in which it is expressly forbidden. Such are the following. Lev. xix. 17, 18; "Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart. Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people. Prov. xxiv. 17, 29; "Rejoice not w hen thine enemy fallcth, and let not thine heart be glad, when hestumbleth. Say not, I will do so to him as he hath done to me : I will render to the man according to Lis work." Rom. xii 19 ; " Avenge I'ot yourselves." Eph. iv. 31 ; "Let all bitterness and wrath, and anger, and 270 SERMON LXXIX. / clamour, and evil speaking^, be put away from you, with all malice." Col. iii. 8; "Put off all these, anger, wrath, malice." Thus God has expressly and repeatedly in his word, forbidden the indulgence of these passions ; and if we regard the authority of God we will guard against it, and habitually maintain the contrary temper. The texts of Scripture on this subject are very numerous; and I have been the more particular in quoting a considerable number of them, because even professing christians are prone to transgress in this respect. 6. I mention one other argument to dissuade from the indulgence of these passions ; and that is, that they who live in them or habitually indulge them cannot be thepeople of God but are children of wrath. The word of God excludes them from the kingdom of heaven, and consigns them to eternal perdition. That such persons cannot enter hea- ven, appears from the very nature of things. Heaven is a place of perfect harmony and love. They therefore who are filled with anger, hatred, malice, or revenge, or who habitually indulge an unforgiving temper, certainly are entirely unfit for admission into heaven. But the Scrip- tures are express on this subject, and as decidedly ex- clude such persons from tlie kingdom of God, as they do the habitual drunkard, liar, profane swearer, and such like sinners. The Scriptures frequently teach that tlie ex- ercise of the opposite temper of love, &c. is essential to the christian character. Thus we read, John xiii. 35. — " By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another." Gal. v. 22, 23. " The fruit of the Spirit is love, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, goodness, meekess." Jam. iii. 17. " The wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to beentreated, full of mercy and good fruits." 1 John ii. 10. " He that loveth his brother abideth in the light, and there is none occasion of stumbling in him." 1. John iii. 14. We know that we have passed from death unto life, be- cause we love the brethren." 1 John iv^ 7. " Beloved, let us love one another ; for love is of God : and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God." And 1 John v. 1. " Every one that loveth him that begat, loveth him also that is begotten of him." Hence we learn that love towards our brethren is an essential trait of the christian character ; and therefore they who are desti- HATRED. 271 tute of this love, and much more they who indulge the contrary temper, cannot be christians. And the Scrip- tures not only by consequence teach this, but also most explicitly and directly declare it. Thus we read in our text, " VVhosoever hateth his brother is a murderer ; and. ye know that no murderer hath eternal hfe abiding in him." Of the same import are the following texts in the same Epistle. 1 John ii. 9. 11. " He that saith ho is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now. He that hateth his brother is in darkness, and walketh in darkness." 1 Johniii. 10, 14. ""In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of tlie de- vil ; whosoever doth not righteousness is not of God, nei- ther he that loveth not his brother. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death," And 1 John iv. 8, 20. Hethat loveth not knoweth not God. If a man say, I love God. and hateth his brother, he is a liar : for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen." Gal. v. 20, 21. The Apostle enumerates the works of the flesh, and includes in the cat- alogue, " hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, and strife ;" and adds, " Of the which, I tell you before, as I have al- so told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God." And Jam. iii. 14, 1.5, 16. We read, "If ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not and lie not against the truth. — This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish. For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work." And as habitual hatred excludes from the kingdom of heaven, so also docs an unforgiving temper. In the Lord's prayer Christ teacheth us to offer up this petition — " For- give us our debts, as we forgive our debtors." Mat. vi. 12. Here we are evidently taught to expect forgivenest, only as we forgive ; and every time we say the Lord's prayer, while there are any whom we have not from the heart forgiven, we do virtually pray for our own destruc- tion. Again our Saviour has expressly declared, Mat. vi. 15. " [f ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your father forgive your trespasses." And Mark xi. 25. 26. " When ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have aught against any : that jour father also which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses. But if you do not forgive. 272 SERMON LXXIX. neither will your father which is in heaven forgive your tres- passes." Language could not be more pointed, than that used in these texts, to prove that unless we forgive, we cannot be forgiven. And it is astonishing that any per- son, whatever be his profession, can for a single moment, after reading or hearing these texts, entertain a hope of salvation, while he refuses to forgive all who have offen- ded him. The necessity of forgiveness, and the fatal consequences of an unforgiving temper, are further taught and en- forced by our Saviour in the 18th Chapter of Matthew. Peter had asked him, " Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him ? till seven times ? Je- sus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, until seven times : but until seventy times seven." Christ then spake a pa- rable to illustrate and enforce the doctrine of forgiveness. A certain king reckoned with his servants. Among them was found one which owed him ten thousand talents, a debt which he was totally unable to pay. His lord mov- ed with compasHon forgave him the debt. Mark now the conduct of this servant who had been forgiven so much, towards his fellow-servants. " The same servant went out, and found one of his fellow-servants, which owed him an hundred pence, and he laid hands on him, and took him by the throat, saying, pay me that thou owest." His fellow-servant entreated " have patience with me and I will pay thee all. And he would not ; but went and cast him into prison, till he should pay the debt." Such is thy conduct, O man or woman, who refuseth to forgive thy fellow creature, who has offended thee ! You expect God to forgive you ten thousand talents, or your numerous and aggravated sins against him, and yet refuse to forgive your brother an hundred pence, or the comparatively trifling Offences, which he has committed against you. In the sequel of the parable you may hear your doom. When his lord heard what the unforgiving servant had done, he " called him, and said unto him, O thou wicked ser- vant, I forgave thee all that debt, because thou desi- redst me. Shouldst not thou also have had compassion on thy fellovv'-servant, even as I had pity on thee ? And his lord was wroth, and deHvered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him. So like- wise," added our Savioiu\ '• shall mv heavenly Father do HATRED. 273 also unto you, if ye from your heart forgive not every one his brother their trespasses." I shall now conclude this discourse with a word of ap- plication. This subject concerns us all, whether we pro- fess religion or not. It is peculiarly inconsistent and crim- inal in professors of religion, to indulge these passions; but in all, they are highly displeasing to God, and exclude from the kingdom of heaven. If then eternal life be im- portant, it is important, that we put away these hateful passions, and live in peace and love. Are there any pre- sent, whether they profess religion or not, who hate oth- ers, who maintain malice in their hearts towar(?s any one, and desire and seek revenge, and would rejoice ii: their injury ? Are there any present, who are at variance with their neighbour, and have not sought reconciliation, or have refused and continue to refuse to be reconciled, and have not from the heart forgiven those who have offended them ? Let them seriously reflect on this subject. Your character is directly contrary to the image of God, to which it is your duty and your glory to be conformed. — - Your temper and conduct are totally unlike the perfect ex- ample of Christ, which it is your duty to imitate; and al- so of that cloud of witnesses who through faith and pa- tience have inherited the promises. Your conduct is to- tally inconsistent with your expectations from God. You hope that God will forgive you, your repeated and aggra- vated offences against him, and yet you refuse to forgive and love your brother. You act in direct opposition to the will of God most clearly made known in his word. — * And such a temper as you maintain is inconsistent with the christian character, and excludes from the kingdom of heaven. These may be hard sayings to corrupt na- iurc ; but they make a part of the whole counsel of God which I am to declare to you. If you hate your broth- er you are in darkness. If you hate your brother and still say that you love God, you deceive yourselves, the Scriptures declare in plain terms that such are liars. If you hate your brother, you are a murderer, and no murderer hath eternal life. Have any offended you, and do you refuse to forgive them ? be assured God will not forgive you. And have you even pronounced their forgive-^ ness with your lips ; but still does hatred keep possession of your hearts ? be assured God will not forgive you: for VOL. II- !?5 274 SERMON LXXIX, he has declared he will not, unless, you from the heart for- give. Brethren this is an important subject. We have reason to fear that many persons fatally deceive them- selves on this point, by entertaining a hope of salvation, while they habitually maintain hatred and an unforgiving temper towards others. On the authority of the word or to pursue them to the neglect, or the breach of God's commandments ; but it is not only permissible to seek after them in a lawful way ; but it is our duty. This is taught in our text; •' If any provide not for his own, and special- ly for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith and is worse than an infidel." Jacob was anxious to provide for his own house ; for he expostulated with Laban, say- ing, " When shall I provide ibr mine own house also ;" Gen. XXX. 30, And Paul wrote to the Corinthians, " The parents ought to lay up for the children ;" 2 Cor .xii. 14. The same duty is further evident from all the numerous exhortations we find in the Scriptures to administer of our substance to the relief and comfort of the needy, which we could not do if we had not of this world's goods. To acquire property, it is our duty to be industrious, frugal, and prudent in the management of our temporal afliiirs, 1. It is our duty to be industrious. Industiy is a duty frequently taught in the Scriptures ; and an indolent chris- tian, is almost if not altogether a contradiction. That industry is a duty we are taught in the curse, which was pronounced upon man after the fall ; " In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till ihov V'Amyii ir n> (he ground ;" Gen. iii, 19. The duty of industry is algo shown 266 SLUMOK LXXXl in the following passages among otheib. " Not slothful in business ;" Rom. xii. 11. "Goto the ant, thou slug- gard ; consider her Avays, and be wise : which having no guide, overseer or ruler, provide their meat in the summer, and gathereth her food in the harvest. How long wilt thou sleep, O sluggard ? When wilt thou arise out of thy sleep ? Yet a little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep : so shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth, and thy want as an armed man ;" Prov. vi. 6 — 11. " The soul of the sluggard desireth, and hath nothing ; but the soul of the diligent shall be made fat;" Prov. xiii. 4. " He becometh poor that dealeth with a slack hand: but the hand of the diligent maketh rich;" Prov. X. 4. " Seest thou a man diligent in his business ? he shall stand before kings ; he shall not stand before mean men ;" Prov. xxii. 29. " I went by the field of the slothful, and by the vineyard of the man void of under- standing ; and lo, it was all grown over with thorns, and nettles had covered the face thereof, and the stone wall thereof was broken down. Yet a little sleep a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep: so shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth ; and thy w ant as an armed man ;" Prov. xxiv. 30 — 34. " Let him that stole steal no more; but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth ;" Eph. iv. 28. " If any would not work, neither should he eat. We command and exhort by our Lord Jesus Christ, that with quietness they work, and eat their own bread;" 2Thes. lii. 10, 12. In these passages, industry is enjoined as a duty, slothfulness is condemned, and the connexion of the former with a com- petency and affluence, and of the latter with poverty, is taught. A man ought to be engaged in some lawful busi- Mt^s, and to be industrious in it. *^And here a question is suggested. What is a lawful business or calling ? I answer, that which will not neces- sarily lead to the neglect of any required duties, or to the breach of any of God's commandments. If a calling al- low us no time or opportunity for the devotional duties of the closet, or of the family ; if it lead to the breach of the Sabbath ; if it must be followed by deceit, or false- hood, or dishonesty ; or if it be connected with ex- tortion and oppression, — it cannot be a lawful cal- DUTIES OF THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. 287 ling. Professing christians cannot engage in and pur- sue such callings with the approbation and blessing of God. And if God permit them to acquire property in such business, his curse will rest upon their gains. — Pro- fessing christians have no business with such callings. — Their souls cannot prosper while engaged in them. The language of such conduct is that they prefer the world to the approbation of God ; and they who continue by their conduct to speak such language, can have no evi- dence that they are the people of God. The language of Christ to his professing people is — " Follow me ; and let the dead bury their dead ;" Mat. viii. 22. While speaking of industry in some lawful calling as a duty, another question may properly be asked. May not a person who already is in possession of a competent and affluent estate, lawfully live in idleness, and not attend te* any business ? This question is answered in the negative ; and especially if such persons be young or in active life. We sometimes see young men, who possess by inheritance large estates, living upon their income, in indolence and dissipation ; and saying with the rich fool in the gospel, '• Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry ;" Luk. xii. 19. Such conduct is altogether wrong. Whatever be our es- tate, industry in some lawful business is a duty. Indus- try is favourable to virtue and religion; whereas sloth is an incentive to many hurtful lusts, which render riches a snare and hinderance to spiritual welfare. And besides, we are stewards of God, and property is not given to us, to be expended merely on ourselves. God in his word charges the rich " that they do good, that they be rich ia good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate;" 1 Tim. vi. 18. IfGodinhis providence, gives us more property than others, we are bound to excel others in do- ing good — relieving the distressed, supporting and exten- ding religion, and promoting objects of public benevolence and utility. If any one should say, my property is alrea- dy so large, that I can do all this, and yet live in indo- lence, he is answered ; if some good can be done without care to improve property- — by industry, which is suited to the nature of man, and conducive to health and virtue, still more good may be done. And God will certainly ?)ccount with u^, not only for the good we raiglit have 288 SERMON LXXXI. done with the property we possessed ; but also for the good we might have been enabled to do, with proper care and industry to improve the property put into our hands. 2. A second duty incumbent upon us in the acquisition ofproperty is frugality. This is the opposite of profuse- ness. Frugahty is opposed to the lavisliing our property on improper objects ; or consuming it to gratify our lusts; or living in a style which our cir<:rumstances will not bear, even if that style in other circumstances were lawful ; or if our circumstances will bear it, living in an expensive style through ostentation or sensuality, while the poor arc neglected. If we would do our duty, in acquiring proper- ty, it is not enough to be industrious, we ought also to be frugal. Many persons labour very hard, and yet contin- ue poor, for want of frugality in their expenditures. The duty of frugality is taught in the following texts — "The substance of a diligent man is precious;" Prov. xii. 27. " He that is slothful in his work, is brother to him that is a great waster ;" Prov. xviii. 9. " There is treasure to be desired, and oil in the dwelling of the wise ; but a foolish man spendeth it up ;" Prov. xxi. 20. One thing for which the prodigal son was condemned was, he " wasted his substance with riotous living ;" Luk. xv. 13. And jOur Saviour taught the duty of frugality, in his direction to his disciples after he had fed the five thousand ; " Gather up the fragments that remain that nothing be lost ;" John vi. 12. If it be asked here, whether frugality is a duty incum- bent on the rich as well as the poor .'' I answer, yes, to a certain degree. It is lawful to live comfortably, and to enjoy the good things that God may give us ; but a pro- iuseness in dress, equipage, meat, or drink, for the grati- fication of pride, or the indulgence of sensual appetites, is wicked. It was for these things, that the rich man in the parable was condemned. He " was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day ;" Luk. xvi. 19. Such sinful conduct is frequent among the rich- Many of them seem to forget, that they are the stewards of God, and accountable to him for the use they make of their property. Almost incalculable good might be done in the world, by what is lavished on costly dress, and e- ftuipage, and entertainments, merely for ostentation, or for ^ne gratification ofappni^ite. Oftcntime!^ the superfluities DUTIES OF THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. 289 at a feast, would render comfortable, many suffering fami- lies among the poor. We find many persons in our world, who can expend hundreds and thousands for ostentation, and the gratification of their sensual appetites, who have little or nothing to give to the poor ; and from whom no arguments or entreaties can draw a little for the promo- tion of rehgion, or of objects of public utility. Such per- sons, in the pride of their hearts may say, I have a right, to do with mine own as I please ; yet they may rest assu- red that God will reckon with them for such a use of their property. And unless they repent of their conduct and change their course, they will finally receive the portion of the rich man. 3. Another duty to be attended to in the acquisition of property is o. prudent management of our temporal aflfairs. A person may be industrious, and labour hard to acquire property, and he may be frugal, avoiding all profuseness ; and yet he may continue poor, through want of prudent management. This every day's observation teach- es. This prudent management includes a great many particulars more than I can name. It includes doing eve- ry thing in its proper season, embracing favourable op- portunities to advance our property in a lawful way, re- deeming the time, taking care of what we get, looking dil- igently to the ways of our household, and a great many other things of alike nature, which will naturally suggest themselves to a prudent and reflecting man, in the course of his business. Thus I have pointed out and illustrated the duties which the eighth commandment requires, with respect to acqui- ring a competency of this world's goods. It is our duty to be industrious, frugal, and economical or prudent in the management of our temporal affairs. Such a course of conduct will generally procure a competency, and not unfrequently affluence. It is true, God, in the course of his providence, may, tor wise and holy ends, prevent this effect. In this case, while we still continue to perform our duty it becomes us to acquiesce in the dispensations of providence, and to endeavour to make a wise use and im- provement of them. And we ought always to remember that it is the blessing of God that maketh rich ; that we are dependent on him in temporal as well as spiritual things; and that without his blessing, should \ye even have sue- VOL. II. 37 290 SERMON LXXXI. cess in business, and acquire property, our property would be cursed. Let us therefore ever feel our dependence on him for his blessing to give success to our lawful pursuits in business. It may be further observed with respect to our own estate, it is our duty, not only to acquire in a lawful way, a competency of this world's goods ; but also to preserve our property when it is acquired. And in order to this, in addition to the duties already pointed out, it is our du- ty to avoid as much as possible engaging in law-suits and suretiships. Persons of a litigious temper, oftentimes in- jure their estates by law-suits. It has been made a ques- tion whether law-suits are in any case morally law- ful ? The apostle Paul, on this subject, wrote to the Co- rinthians ; " There is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law one with another. Why do ye not rather take wrong ? why do ye not rather suffer yourselves to be de- frauded ?" 1 Cor. vi. 7. And in our Saviour's sermon on the Mount we read ; " If any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also ;" Mat. V. 40. These texts appear very strong against law-suits. But that they are not to be understood as forbidding them in all cases and all circumstances, appears from several considerations. To understand these texts in this abso- lute sense would be opening a door for oppression, and inviting the wicked to oppress the righteous. Besides it is certain that, under the Old Testament, God himself directed the appointment of judges to decide controver- sies ; And Solomon said, " Strive not with a man without cause ; Prov. iii. 30. Which implies that there is a law- ful striving. The text above quoted must be explained in consistency with other parts of Scripture. In regard to the text quoted from the writings of the apostle Paul on the subject of law-suits ; it appears from the context that he referred to law-suits carried on by christians before Heathen and infidel magistrates, whereby the christian religion was scandalized. And the meaning of the Apostle appears to be, that christians ought rather to make up their differences among themselves ; and if their disputes could not otherwise be settled, rather to suffer wrong, than to do any thingto the prejudice of the gospel. But I do not suppose that the Apostle intended to forbid christian&j in a christian community, and before christian DUTIES OP THE EIGHTH COMMANDIVIEMT, 291 magistrates, to defend or recover their own by law, when they cannot otherwise do it. As to what our Saviour said, we may suppose he referred to small matters, in which it was better to lose a little than contend ; and es- pecially at that time, when from the prejudice that exis- ted against his disciples, they could scarcely hope to have justice done them. However, both these texts teach us, as much as possible to avoid contention; and that it is better, especially in small matters ; to suffer wrong than to contend. 7\nd indeed experience has proved, that ve- ry frequently persons would save property by so doing. — And christians certainly ought, as much as possiMe to a- void law-suits ; and if after using every other means to obtain their right, they are compelled to have recourse to the law, they ought to conduct their law-suits with chris- tian meekness and forbearance. To preserve our property, suretiships are also, as much as possible, to be avoided. Becoming surety for others is very often followed by ruinous consequences. In the Proverbs of Solomon we read, " My son if thou be surety for thy friend, if thou hast stricken thy hand with a stran- ger— Thou art snared with the words of thy mouth, thou art taken with the words of thy mouth. Do this now, my son, and deliver thyself, when thou art come into the hand of thy friend ; go, humble thyself and make sure thy friend. Give not sleep to thine eyes nor slumber to thine eyelids. Deliver thyself as a roe from the hand of the hunter, and as a bird from the hand of the fowler ;" — Prov. ix. 1 — 5. " He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it : and he that hateth suretiship is sure :" — Prov. xi. 15. Tlie truth of these texts many have known by sad experience. Once more, it is our duty to use our estate to render ourselves and families comfortable. For not only does he fall short of his duty and break the eighth commandment, who throughhis want of industry, frugahty, or economy, has not wherewith to render his family comfortable ; but he also, who has of this world's goods, and yet through penuriousness, and a miserly disposition, suffers them to want. There are some such beings in the world, but we hope they are rare. To conclude — are there any present who provide not for their own households .'* VVhosc famihes are Buffering 292 SERMON LXXXIl. for want of the necessaries of life, or who have not its com- forts ? What is the cause of this ? Is it through yourne- glect or misconduct ? Or while you are making every proper effort, does Providence render all your attempts abortive ? This last may sometimes, but we have reason to believe, very seldom, be the cause. The fault gener- ally lies in the persons themselves. They are idle, or they want frugality, or they are destitute of economy, or they have made, or keep themselves poor by improper lit- igations, orsuretiships, or in some such way. Let idle drones, who are lounging away their time, while their families suffer, unless the industrious and be- nevolent assist them ; let those who neglect the duties of frugality and economy at home, and perhaps not only this, but spend abroad what little they get, while their fa- milies are suffering ; and let all whose families are depri- ved of comforts, or suffer through their fault, remember, that their conduct is very criminal in the sight of God, "who has declared, " If any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the aith and is worse than an infidel." SERMON LXXXIL DUTIES OF THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. MICAH IV. 8. MIDDLE CLAUSE. " To do justly and to love mercy ^ The Lord had a controversy with the people of Israel for their sins. This the prophet had made known to them in the beginning of the chapter. Hence the Israel- ites, probably because they were alarmed at this decla- ration, inquired how they might avert the wrath, and ob- tain the favour of God : " Wherewith shall I come before the Lord, and bow myself before the high God ? Shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a DUTIES OF THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. 293 vpar old? Will the Lord be pleased with thousands of rams, or with ten thousands of rivers of oil ? Shall I give my first-born for my transgression, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul ?" To these questions the prophet replied ; " He hath shewed thee, O man what is good ; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy Go^ ?" These words embrace the sum of revealed religion. They teach us to render to God and man their just due, to be kind towards our fellow-men, and with humility, sensil)le that we are sinners, to walk with God in all his com- mandments. The part of the verse which has been chosen as our text, viz. " to do justly, and to love mercy," embraces the duties required in the eighth commandment, in relation to the outward estate of others. " The eighth coinmandment rer/uircth, the lawful procuring and furthering the wealth and outivard estate of ourselves and others.'^ We have illustrated the duties of this commandment in relation to our own wealth and outward estate. We come now to consider the duties of the same commandment as they regard the wealth and outward estate of others. These duties are divided into those of justice and mer- I. Justice. The eighth commandment requires that we do justly. Justice, as it relates to the estate of others, may be considered the same as honesty. A christian must be a just or honest man ; and although honesty can never save us, as many vainly suppose, yet we cannot be saved without it. And although it may exist, without a saving faith in Christ, and therefore in a person w ho is still under condemnation, and a child of wrath ; yet where there is true faith in Christ, there will be honesty or jus- tice in our dealings, as its fruit. And that man's religion is vain whatever be his professions, who is unjust or dis- honest in his dealings with his fellow-men. Let us describe the character of the honest man ; and then show that honesty is a part of true religion. The rule of the strictly honest man is, always in his dealings with mankind, to do to others, as he would that they in exchange of circumstances should do to him. Following this rule, when he purchases commodities, he does not 294 SERMON LXXXli. endeavour to sink them in the estimatioa of the owncr^ that he may take advantage of his credulity, and get them belovir their value. Neither when he wishes to plirchase, does he take advantage of another's ignorance or necessi- ty, to procure his commodities at a price beneath their value. He does not deceive others in selling, by crying up his goods above their value, or concealing their de- fects. He does not keep false weights and measures. — He does not buy or borrow, with a view never to pay ; or when he knows it is very doubtful, whether he ever will be able to pay, while at the same time he conceals his sit- uation from his creditors. He is faithful to the trusts repo- sed in him, and does not take advantage of forms of law, to withhold from his neighbour his just due. He does not dis- pute the debts which he knows to be just. He does not, ■when he is able to pay his just debts, delay payment^ to the disappointment, and injury of his creditors ; or put them to the trouble and expense of a law-suit to recover their just due. In short, in all his dealings with others, that rule already quoted is his guide, to do to others, as he would that others should do to him. The proofs in Scripture that justice or honesty is a christian duty, and necessary to the christian character are numerous. We shall quote some of them. In the Mosaic law we read, "Thou shalt not defraud thy neighbour. Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in mete-yard, in weight, or in measure. Just balances, just weights, a just ephah, and a just bin, shall ye have;" Lev. xix. 13, 35, 36. " Thou shalt not have in thy bag divers w^eights, a great and a small. Thou shalt not have in thine house divers measures, a great and a small. But thou shalt have a perfect and just weight, a perfect and just measure shalt thou have. For all that do such things and all that do unrighteously, are an abomination unto the Lord thy God ;" Deut. xxv. 13 — 16. The wise man in his Proverbs tells us, " To do justice, is more acceptable to the Lord, than sacrifice ;" Prov. xxi. 3. " A false balance is abomi- nation to the Lord ; but a just weight is his delight ;" — Prov. xi. 1. "Divers weights, and divers measures, both of them are alike abomination to the Lord. Divers weights are an abomination to the Lord : and a false balance is not good;" Prov. xx. 10, 23. And he condemns the too common practice of depreciating things that we wish to DUTIES OF THE EIGHTH COMMAND:\i£.iVr. 295 buy that we may get them below their value. " It is naught, it is naught, saith the buyer : but when he is gone his way, then he boasteth;" Prov. xx. 14. The prophet Micah declares in our text, that one of the principal things which God requires of us, is " to do justly." And in some following verses of the same chapter, we hear the Lord asking, *•• Are there yet the treasures of wickedness in the house of the wicked, and the scant measure that is abominable ? Shall I count them pure with the wicked balances, and with the bag of deceitful weights .^" In the prophecy of Malachi the Lord says, " I will come near to you to judgment, and I will be a swift witness against those that oppress the hireling in his wages, the widow and the fatherless, and that turn aside the stranger from his right;" Mai. iii. 5. Our Saviour directed, "AH things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them;" Mat. vii. 12. And Paul in his epistles, frequently spoke on this subject. Thus he directed the Romans, " Provide things honest in the sight of all men ;" Rom. xii. 17. " Let us walk honestly as in the day;" Rom. xiii. 13. To the Corinthians he wrote, blaming some of them, " You do wrong, and defraud ;" 1 Cor. vi. 8. And he exhorted the whole church, " providing for honest things, not only in the sight of the Lord, but also in the sight of men ;" 2 Cor. viii. 21. The Philippians he ex- horted, " Whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just — think on these things;" Phil. iv. 8. And he cautioned the Thessalonians, " that no man go beyond and defraud his brother in any matter : because that the Lord is the avenger of all such ;" 1 Thes. iv. 6. From all these passages, we must be convinced of the importance of justice or honesty, in all our dealings with others ; and that the religion of a dishonest man is vain. But here it may be important to caution against a dan- gerous error, which some entertain. Many make the whole of religion to consist in honesty, and on this founda- tion build their hopes of future happiness. This is a most dangerous error. Faith in Christ, which is the act of a renewed heart, and by which Christ is received and rest- ed upon, for pardon and acceptance, as he is offered in the gospel, is indispensably necessary to salvation. Witli- out this faith, according to the Scriptures, a man must perish. Now a man may be honest in his dealings with 296 SERMON LXXXII. the world, and yet be destitute of this faith ; and there- fore a man may be honest, and yet perish. But at the same time, we must remark, that although a man may have honesty without true faith, he cannot have true faith without honesty. Faith will produce this fruit ; for faith ■without Avorks is dead. But while the true believer is an honest man, he will renounce all dependence on his hon- esty, as the ground of his acceptance with God, and de- pend solely on the merits of the Lord Jesus Christ. Under the head of justice in our dealings with others, is also included restitution of property^ which of right be- longs to another. Reason teaches that we should render to every man his own. And the duty is frequently taught in the word of God, as in the following passages ; Ex. xxii. l,&c. ; "If a man steal an ox, or a sheep, and kill it, or sell it ; he shall restore five oxen for an ox ; and four sheep for a sheep. If the theft be certainly found in his hand alive, whether it be ox, or ass, or sheep ; he shall restore double. If a man shall cause a field or vineyard to be eaten, and shall put in his beast, and shall feed in another man's field : of the best of his own field, and of the best of his own vineyard shall he make restitu- tion. If fire break out, and catch in thorns, so that the stacks of corn, or the standing corn, or the field be consumed therewith ; he that kindled the fire shall surely make restitution. For all manner of trespass, whether it be for ox, for ass, for sheep, for raiment, or for any manner of lost thing, which another challengeth to be his ; the cause of both parties shall come before the judges ; and whom the judges shall condemn, he shall pay double unto his neighbour." The same duty of restitu- tion is enjoined, Lev. vi. 2 — 5 ; " If a soul sin, and com- mit a trespass against the Lord, and lie unto his neigh- bour in that which was deliverered him to keep, or in fel- lowship, or in a thing taken away by violence, or hath deceived his neighbour; or have found that which was lost, and lieth concerning it, and sweareth falsely ; in an} of all these that a man doth sinning therein : Then it shall be because he hath sinned and is guilty, that he shall re- store that which he took violently away, or the thing which he halh deceitfully gotten, or that which was de- livered him to keep, or the lost thing which he found, of all that about which he hath sworn falselv ; he shall even. DUTIES OF THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. 297 restore it in the principal, and shall add the fifth part more thereto, and give it unto him to whom it appertain- eth." The prophet Samuel when lie asserted his integ- rity before the people, said, 1 Sam. xii. 3 ; " Behold, here I am, witness against me before the Lord, and before his anointed ; whose ox have I taken ? or whose ass have I taken ? or whom have I defrauded ? whom have J oppressed ? or of whose hand have I received any bribe to blind mine eyes therewith ? and I will restore it you." And Zacheus the publican, when he received Christ joyfully into his house, and embraced his religion, " stood and said unto the Lord, Behold Lord — if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold ;" Luk. xix. 8. This determination was approved by Christ. From these passages the duty of restitution is plain. There are many ways in which a person may come in- to the possession of his neighbour's property. It is some- limes obtained by theft ; sometimes by deceit or fraud ; sometimes by a breach of trust, sometimes by find- ing that which was lost, and knowing the owner ; and sometimes by a course of law, when for want of due evidence, property has been wrested from the real owner, when the person who received it, knew in his own mind that he had no right to it; in all these cases, and in every other case, where a person has ob- tained the property of another, it is his duty to make res- titution. And the least restitution which ought to be made, is the whole of the principal, together with a rea- sonable compensation for its use. Until this is done, our neighbour has not his right ; we detain from him that which is his ; and guilt must lie upon our consciences, un- less the rightful owner voluntarily declines receiving his own. Then the property becomes ours by gift. And here I would observe, that in cases oi failure for debt, we have reason to believe much fraud is frequently practised. No doubt honest men have sometimes failed. When they contracted their debts, they had a fair pros- pect of paying them ; but by adverse providences and unforseen events, they were disappointed. But we have reason to believe, many contract debts, far beyond what ihey have any prospect of paying ; and even when they know that they must fail ; and wlien they have no inten- yoh. n. ' 38 29S iERMON Lxxxn. tion of paying. Such conduct is certainly, in the sight of God, highly unjust and criminal ; and the more so as de- ceit has been added to injustice. But whatever may have been a person's conduct previous to his failure, there can be no doubt, that he is bound in equity, and by the laws of religion, however he may be cleared by human laws, if he ever becomes able, to make restitution, and pay all his debts, with a reasonable allowance for the loss which his creditors may have sustained. This, and nothing short of this is strict honesty ; and until this is done, guilt must lie on the conscience of the man who once has failed, and who has since acquired sufficient property to discharge his debts, unless his creditors vol- untarily release him from his obligation, and refuse to re- ceive restitution. Alas ! but few, we have reason to fear, do their duty in this business. Many who once failed become affluent and live in luxury, while their creditors are straitened and poor, for want of that which they have taken and withhold from them. Surely such conduct must be very offensive to a righteous God. Be exhorted, my hearers to attend to this subject of res- titution. Have you in any way come into the possession of property, which you know belongs to another and not to you ? Go and make restitution. This is your duty ; and you have no right to hope that you are in favour with God while you refuse to do it. II. We proceed to the second class of duties contain- ed in our text, and belonging to the eighth commandmentj in relation to our neighbour's wealth and outward estate ; viz. mercy. It is our duty not only " to do justly ;" but also " to love mercy." It is our duty to assist others, who may stand in need of our aid. This we may do by our counsels, pointing out to them wherein they are conducting disadvantageously, or inju- riously, and instructing them in the best modes of doing business ; by lending them aid, when we have a reasona- ble prospect of being repaid ; and by using our influence, when we have opportunity, to get them into business. In this way many have furthered the prosperity of others. It is also our duty to endeavour to save the property of others when we see it taking injury. This duty is taught in the following passage, Deut. xxii. 1 — 3; " Thou shalt not see thy brother's ox or his sheep go astray, and DUTIES OF THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. 299 hide thyself irorn them ; thou shalt in any case bring them, again unto thy brother. And if ihy brother be not nigh unto thee, or if thou know him not, then thou shalt bring it unto thine own house, and it shall be w ith thee until thy brother seek after it, and thou shalt restore it to him again. In like manner shalt thou do with his ass, and so shalt thou do with his raiment; and with all lost things of thy broth- er's which he hath lost, and thou hast found, shalt thou dp likewise; thou maycst not hide thyself." And even if the owner be our enemy, it is our duty to endeavour to save his property from injury, as we learn from the following passage; Ex. xxiii. 4. 5; "If thou meet thine enemy's ox oi* his ass going astray, thou shalt surely bring it back to him again. If thou see the ass of him that hateth thee lying under his burden, and wouldest forbear to help him; thou ahalt surely help with him." Another way in which it is our duty to assist others, is by contributing of the substance which God has given us, for their relief and support, when they are distressed and poor. The duty of liberality to the poor is very frequent- ly enjoined in the Scriptures, and even declared to be es- sential to the christian character. We shall quote some of the many texts on this subject. In the Mosaic law we i-ead, "If thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in de- cay with thee ; then thou shalt relieve him : yea, though he be a stranger, or a sojourner; that he may live with thee;" Lev. XXV. 35. " If there be among you a poor man of one of thy brethren, w ithin any of thy gates, thou shalt not harden thy heart, nor shut thine hand irom thy poor brother; But thou shalt open thine hand wide unto him, and shalt sure- ly lend him sufficient for his need, in that which he wan^ teth. Thou shalt surely give him, and thine heart shall not be grieved when thou givest unto him: because ihat for this thing the Lord thy Cod shall bless thee in all thy works, and in all that thou puttest thine hand unto. For the poor shall never cease out of the land : therefore I command thee, saying, thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor, and to thy needy, in thy land;" Deut. xv. 7 — H. The Psalmist describing the godly man saith, " He is ever merciful and lendeth ; and his seed is blessed ;" Ps. xxxvii. 26. " A good man showeth fovour and lendeth.-- He hath dispersed, he hath given to the poor ; Ps. cxtk 300 SERMON LXXXII. 5, 9. And he declares, '• Blessed is he that considereth the poor ; the Lord will deliver him in time of trouble. He shall be blessed upon the earth :" Ps. xLi. 1, 2. The wise man saith " he that hath mercy on the poor happy is he. He that oppresseth the poor, reproacheth his Ma- ker : but he that honoureth him hath mercy on the poor ;" Prov. xiv. 21, .31. *' He that hath pity upon the poor lendeth unto the Lord ; and that which he hath giv- en will he pay him again ;" Prov. xix. 17. The New Testament abounds with similar instructions. Our Sa- viour taught, "it is more blessed to give than to receive ;" Acts XX. 35. Paul exhorted the Romans, " if thine enemy hunger, feed him ; if he thirst, give him drink :" Rom. xii. 20. He wrote to the Corinthians, " God loveth a cheer- ful giver ;" 2 Cor. ix. 7. And he charged the Hebrews, " To do good, and to communicate forget not" and added, " for with such sacrifices, God is well pleased ;" Kcb. xiii. 16. And the apostle John was very pointed on this subject. " Whoso hath this world's good and sceth his brother need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, howdwelleth the love of God in him ;" 1 John iii. 17. From these passages we learn that liberality to the poor is a duty incumbent on all those who have the means; that a blessing is connected with the right performance of this duty : and that the habitual neglecters of it, have not the love of God in them. Liberality, to be acceptable must flow from right prin- ciples, such as compassion to the poor, a sense of duty, and a regard to God's authority and glory. There is such a thing as giving all our goods to feed the poor, and yet continuing destitute of the favour of God, because the principle of action is wrong. The principle being good, our liberality ought to be performed promptly or without delay, when our neighbour is in distress. As saith Solomon, " Say not unto thy neighbour, go, and come again, and to-morrow I will give thee, when thou hast it by thee ;" Prov. iii. 28. It ought to be done as secretly as may be, without a desire to be seen of men, or commended by them. As our Saviour directed ; " When thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth ; that thine alms may be in secret : and thy Father, which seeth in DUTIES OF THE EIGHTH COMMANDMEi^T. 301 .-ccret, himself sliall reward thee openly ;'" Mat. vi. 3, 4. It ought to be done cheerfully, as saith Paul, "Not grudg- jnolv, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful 2;iver;-' Prov. ix. 7. Ill determining what proportion ot our sub- stance we ought to give to the poor, we must be govern- ed in some measure by the circumstances of our estate and family, and the necessities of the poor. Taking these in- to consideration, and attending to the word and provi- dences of God to direct us, we must be left to our own consciences to determine, as stewards of God, ;\nd ac- countalde to him. As to the proper objects of charity we may observe, that it is not our duty, to encourage idleness, and sloth, and support those who, while they are able, are too indo- lent to labour. It is true many families are brought into distress through the idleness or intemperance of one or both the heads thereof In this case, when they are act- ually suffering, it is our duty to endeavour to relieve tiiem ; but at the same time we ought to endeavour to do ihcm still more good, by labouring to bring them into industrious, temperate, and frugal habits. We have also many strolling poor, who at our doors ask our charity. I believe it is very seldom indeed, our duty to give such. In our country, provision is made for the poor, and they seldom if ever have reason to travel about in this manner. Besides many of them take this method lO support themselves because they are too indolent to gain a livelihood by honest labour. 'And many of them are impostors, who come to us with lies in their mouths, and expend our charity to procure the means of intem- perance. Such persons ought to be discouraged and frowned upon ; and we ought to have good evidence in- deed that a strolling person is a proper object of charity, before we bestow any thing upon him, which he can ex- pend in this way. The industrious poor among us, and especially the poor of the household ot faith, who liave been reduced or kept poor, by adverse providences, most of all claim our assis- tance. To conclude ; let us be influenced by strict justice in all our dealings with the world ; and let us love mercy and ever be ready, according as the Lord has prosperr^d us, to do good unto others, and admniister to the necessi- ties of the destitute. — Amev. SERMON LXXXUl blSS AGAINST THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT ! EXODUS XX. 15. " Thou shalt not steaV We have in former discourses attended to an illustration of the duties required in the eighth commandment ; we come now in course to consider the sins forbidden by this commandment. These include, not only actual theft, but also all improper conduct with respect to our own and our neighbour's outward estate. These sins are summarily expressed in the answer to the 75th question of our Shorter Catechism. " Wkat is forbidden in the eighth commandment? The eighth commandment forbiddeth whatsoever doth or maif ^mjustly hinder our own or our 7ieighbour''s wealth or outward estate.'''' According to this answer, the sins forbidden in this com- mandment may be divided into two great classes, viz. those against our own estate, and those against the estate of others. In the first class we may reckon idleness, prodigality, all indiscreet management of our temporal atTairs, covetous- ness, and all improper ways of enricliing ourselves, or of using our estate. In the second class we may enumerate theft, removing land-marks, dishonesty, oppression, extortion, and usury. Of each of these particular sins, we shall treat in their order. I. The sins against the eighth commandment, in regard to our oivn estate. And 1. Idleness. In a former discourse, on the duties required in this commandment, industry was proved to be a duty ; it therefore follows of course, that idleness, which is its op- posite is a sin. Besides, this is proved by the declarations of Scripture ; "Go to the ant thou sluggard (saith Solomon) SINS AGAINST THE EIGHTH COMiVIANDMENY. 303^ consider her ways and be wise. How long wilt thou sleep 0 sluggard ? when wilt thou arise out of thy sleep ? Yet a little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep : so shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth, and thy want as an armed man;" Prov. vi. 6, 9, 10, 11. 1 went by the field of the slothful, and by the vineyard of the man void of understanding: And lo, it was all grown over with thorns, and nettles had covered the face there- of, and the stone wall thereof was broken down : yet a little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep ; so shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth ; and thy want as an armed man ;" Prov. xxiv. 30. 34. — Paul exhorted the Romans to be, " not slothful in busi- ness." Rom. xii. 11. These and several other texts con- demn idleness, and prove that it is a sin. 2. Another sin against the eighth commandment, in re- ference to our own estate, \^ prodigality^ or a wasting our property, by lavishing it on improper objects, or by con- suming it to gratify our lusts, or by living in a style which our circumstances will not bear. Frugality has been pro- ved to be a duty, and therefore prodigality which is its op- posite is a sin. And in Scripture the spendthrift is called a " foolish man ;" Prov. xxi. 20. And the waster is said to be brother to him that is slothful in his work ; Prov. xviii. 9. And prodigality was one principal thing for which the prodigal son was condemned. 3. Another sin against the eighth commandment in re- ference to our own estate is an indiscreet management of our temporal aflairs. This is the opposite of economy. and includes several particulars, such as neglecting the proper and most advantageous season in which to do bu- siness, doing it in an improper and disadvantageous man- ner, carelessness about what we already possess, negli- gence in looking well to the ways of our household, and such like particulars. 4. Another sin against this commandment, in reference to our own estate is covctousness. By this wc understand, as it relates to this commandment, avarice, or an inordin- ate disire after and love of riches. It is lawful to desire property, to make exertions to obtain it, and to value it when possessed, that we and our families may be comfort- able, and that we may be useful in the world. But this Jawful desire after property is moderate. It is not thp 304 SERMON LXXXUI. principal desire; and it is kepi in subordination to the glorj of God. But "whenever the desire of property passes this bound, and becomes immoderate ; whenever we set our hearts upon wealth, so as to esteem it the chief good, and have such an insatiable desire after it that we cannot b^ satisfied ; when we feel determined to have it, even though in obtaining it we should neglect and break God's commandments ; and when disappointment makes us re- pine— then our desires after wealth become sinful. They are inordinate and covetous. Covetousness is a sin very common in our world ; and perhaps there is no sin of equal criminality, that men are less sensible of, or that less wounds the conscience. — And, perhaps, it is a sin, that as much, if not more than any other, entirely governs the man w ho indulges it, and steels his heart against the impressions of true religion. — It is a desire that gains strength with age. It remains and grows stronger, when almost every other propensity has, by the decay of nature, become w^eaker or extinct. It is a sin which oftentimes leads to the perpetration of other sins and to very evil consequences. And it is a sin into which professors of religion,sometimes fall, and which they cherish and which it is exceedingly difficult to convince them of, and persuade them to renounce. That covetous- ness is a sin, and very offensive to God, the Scriptures very clearly and repeatedly teach. In the Psalms we read, " the wicked blesseth the covetous, whom the Lord abhorreth;" Ps. X. 3. Our Saviour exhorted, " take heed and heware of covetousness;" Luk. xii. 15. Paul in his epistles has given frequent warnings against this sin, and taught its heinousness. He charged the Corinthians, " not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be covetous, with such an one, no not to eat;" 1 Cor. v. 11. And iu the same epistle, he included in a catalogue, which he gave of characters who should not inherit the king- dom of God, the covetous ; 1 Cor. vi. lO. To the Ephe- sians he wrote, " this ye know that no covetous man who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God ;" Eph. v. 5. To the Colossians he wrote, " mortify your members which are upon the earth — covetousness which is idolatry : for which tiling's sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedi- ence;" Col. iii. 5. (i. And in that group of wicked char- &ms AGAINST THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. 305 attars, which he informed Timothy should appear in the last days and make perilous times, the covetous are in- cluded ; 2 Tim. iii. 2. From these texts it clearly ap- pears that covetousness is a great siui For it is ranked with the most heinous sins ; it is a sin which God pecu- liarly abhorreth ; it is idolatry ; and it excludes from the kingdom of heaven. The evils 'and danger of this sin, and that it leads to other sins we are taught in the follow- ing passages. It was one of the leading sins which cau- sed the judgments of God upon the Jews, when he sent them into captivity in Babylon ; as said the Lord by Jer- emiah, " Therefore will I give their wives unto others, and their fields to them that shall inherit them ; for eve- ry one, from the least even unto the greatest, is given to covetousness; Jer. viii. 10. The prophet Micah taught, that this sin frequently leads to oppression and violence, when cherished by those who have power. '' They covet lields (said he) and take them by violence; and houses, and take them away ; so they oppress a man and his house, even a man and his heritage ;" Mic. ii. 2. Solomon taught that this sin sometimes leads to murder, in the following passage. '^ They say come with us, let us lay wait for blood, let us lurk privily for the innocent without cause. We shall find all precious substance ; we shall fill our houses with spoil. Tlieir feet run to evil, and make haste to shed blood. So are the ways of every one that is ijreedy of gain : which taketh away the life of the owners thereof;" Prov. i. 11, 13, 16, 19."' Paul also, 1 Tim. vi. 9, 10 ; taught the great danger, and the evil consequen- ces of this sin. " They that will be rich (said he) fall in- to temptation, and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdi- tion. For the love of money is the root of all evil ; which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows." — These texts teach us the danger of this vice, and solemnly caution us ajjainst it. And the Scriptures furnish many examples, which show the great evil of this sin, its tendency to lead to other sins, and its dangerous consequences: and which serve as war- nings to us to beware of covetousness. This was the ru- ling passion of Laban ; and it led him to such mean and wicked actions, as has rendered his character odious aniJ VOL. n. 39 306 SERMON LXXXlIIc contemptible in the eyes of all future generations. It led him to sell his daughters in marriage ; to keep his son-in- law in servitude for many years ; to deceive him ; to change his wages ten times ; to oppress him in such a manner that he had finally to flee from him ; and then to pursue him, with intentions to injure him. Covetousness .was also the ruling passion of Balaam, and it led him to go to Balak in opposition to the will of God ; and after- wards to give counsel to corrupt the children of Israel, which finally issued in a war, in which Balaam lost his life. It was this passion, that led Achan at the taking of Jericho, to take and secrete for himself, some of the spoils of the city, contrary to the express command of God, which conduct issued in his own death, and the death of all his family. This passion led the sons of Samuel to take bribes, and pervert judgment. The same passion led Judas to betray his Master, the consequence of which was suicide. And it was covetousness that led Demas to renounce religion. These examples are held up to us as warnings to beware of covetousness. And the history of the world also furnishes us with many examples, of the odiousness, evils and danger of this passion. It has led to oppression, extortion dishonesty, theft, murder and almost every vice. It has desolated whole countries. It has often rendered the wretch that cherished it an unhappy mortal. It has sometimes under disappointments driven him to dis- traction and suicide. And it has destroyed thousands of souls, throughout eternity. Are any of you my hearers under the influence of this passion? Examine yourselves carefully and impartially, and admit a conviction of the truth. And if there be a covetous man present, let him consider the sinfulness, evil, and danger of cherishing this passion. Above all let him remember that covetousness is idolatry, and excludes from the kingdom of heaven. And let him mortify this corrup- tion, and suffer it no more to influence his conduct. 5. We observe again in reference to our own estate, that we break the eiglith commandment, by all improper me* thods of enriching ourselves, and of using our estate, when we possess it. There are many sinful ways of enriching our- selves, in some of which we break the eighth command- ment, not only in reference to our own estate, but also to the estate of others, by encroaching on their rights. Pur- SINS AGAINST THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. 307 suing an unlawful calling is a sinful way of acquiring an estate. By unlawful callings are meant such, as necessa- rily lead to a neglect of required duties, or a breach of God's commandments. Pursuing a lawful calling in an unlawful manner is also an improper way of acquiring pro- perty. This is very frequently done, as for instance, by those, who are so intent on their secular business, that they cannot find time to attend to the duties of the closet, the family, and the sanctuary, in their proper seasons ; and by those who pursue their worldly business, either them- selves, or by those in their employ on the Sabbath day. Property is also sometimes acquired by dishonesty, op- pression, extortion, usury and theft. By such practices, persons sin, both in relation to their own estate, and the estate of others. I mention one other sinful way of acquiring property, which is frequently taken, and that is gaming or gambling in all its diflferent forms. Several reasons may be ofTer- ed to show that this practice is sinful. In all games of chance as they are called, there is the use of the lot, w^iich is an implicit appeal to Providence, who is the dispo- ser of the lot. And it is sinful on a trifling occasion, and in such anirreverent manner tomake an appealto providence. Besides, gambling excites the sinful passion of avarice, ir- ritates the temper, provokes to other crimes such as profancness, and fraud, and sometimes leads to sui- cide. But what more especially belongs to ourpresentsubject is that it is a sin against the eighth commandment. Gam- blers who win, thereby injure their neighbour's property >, and perhaps ruin him, and his family also, if he has one. And they who lose, thereby injure their own property, and not unfrequently ruin themselves, and render their fixmilies wretched. Anotherevidence of the wickedness of this practice is, the character in a moral and religious respect of the whole tribe of professed gamblers. Let all beware of this practice in all its forms. And if there be any present addicted to it, let them forsake it as they regard the favour of God and their own happiness. Thus I have pointed out some improper ways of enrich- ing, or of endeavouring to enrich ourselves. I would fur- ther remark, that we break this commandment, by an im- proper use of our estate when we possess it. A prodigal 308 SERMON LXXXIlf. use of it is wrong ; and so also is a using it as a means of oppression ; and further we sin by a miserly hoarding it up ; denying ourselves and families the comforts of life ; and refusing to assist the poor and needy : and to pro- mote objects of benevolence, public utility, and religion. We proceed to the III. Class of sins against this commandment, viz. those practices whith do or mcnj unjustly hinder our neighbour'' s weakh or outward estate. And, 1. Theft. By this is meant secretly taking what belongs to another, with a view to devote it to our own use. If violence be used the act becomes robbery. Theft is a- gainst the express letter of this commandment, ^' Thou shalt not steal." This is a peculiarly disgraceful sin a- mong men. A more disgraceful character in the opinion of the world can scarcely be given to a person, than that he or she is a thief This sin is frequently forbidden in the Scriptures under heavy penalties. Under the Mosaic law the thief was required to make heavy restitution. — God by the mouth of his prophet Zechariah pronounced a curse against the thief, " Behold a flying roll — This is the curse that eo.eth over the fac^ of the whole eartli ; for every one that stealeth shall be cut off as on this side ac- cording to it. I will bring it forth saith the Lord of liosts, and it shall remain in the midst of his house, and shall con- sume it with the timber thereof and the stones thereof ;" Zech. V. 1,3,4. Paul includes thieves, in that catalogue of characters, which he excludes from the kingdom of heaven. Theft therefore of every kind is a very heinous sin. It is disgraceful among men ; it exposes to human punishments ; and it is very offensive to God, and will, unless repented of and forsaken, exclude from the happi- ness of heaven. Therefore, in the words of the Apostle, " Let him that stole, steal no more ;" Eph. iv. 28. On this subject, I would further observe, that the worst kind of theft is that which is denomiiipted man-stealing. This i»y the Mosaic law was punished with death. As we read, Ex. xxi. 16; " He that stealeth a man, and sel- leth him, or if be be found in his hand, be shall surely be put to death." We may observe again while on the subject of theft, that, as it is a breach of this commandment to steal, so is it also, knowingly to receive that which has been stolen* SINS AGAINST THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. 309 The receiver is partaker with the thief in his crime. In the charge which the Lord makes against the wicked in Psalm l. 16. we liave these words, '* When thou sawest a thief, then thou consentedst w ith him." And Prov. xxix. 24, we read, " Whoso is partner m ith a thief hateth his own soul.*" 2. Another sin in reference to our neighbour's estate^ forbidden in this commandment, is removiiui- our neiii;hhour'' s land mark. Thus we read, Prov. xxiii. 10; " Remove not the old land-mark ; and enter not into the fields of tlie fitherless." Dcut. xix. It;- Thou shall not remove thy neighbour's land-mark, which they of old time have set in thine inheritance." And Deut. xxvii. 17; cursed belie that removeth his neighbours land-mark ; and all the people shall say, Amen." 3. Another sin included in this commandment in re- gard to the estate of others is dishonesty. This sin includes a great many particulars. In general it is a breach, in our commerce with the world, of the following rule §iven by our Saviour ; " All things whatsoever ye w ould that men should do to you, do ye even so to them ;" Mat. vii. 12. Whenever we transgress this rule, in our dealings with men, we act dishonestly. To mention some partic- ulars. He is a dishonest man, who takes advantage of another's credulity or ignorance, to purchase his com-, modities beneath their value, or to sell his own goods a- bove their price. False weights and measures, and all tleception in trade, are dishonest. He is a dishonest man who buys or borrows with an intention never to pay, or when he knows it is very doubtful whether he ever will be able to pay. He is a dislionest man who puts his pro- perty out of his hands, to prevent the payment of his just debts. He is a dishonest man, who in drawing any contract in writing, puiposely omits or inserts a clause, of which advantage may be taken in law to the detriment of the other party. And all taking advantage of forms of law, to withhold or wrest from another his right, is dis- honest ; and so also is all unfaithfulness to the trusts re- posed in us. These are some of the instances in w hich dishonesty is practised. There are a great many more. A good rule by which to determine in particular cases, whether an action be dishonest or not, is to ask ourselves, whether we would judge it to be strictly right in our 31U SERMON LXXXUU neighbour to act towards us in this manner. All deceit and fraud and unrighteousness are frequently condemned in the Scriptures, and the contrary is required. It is un- necessary to point you to particular passages. Dishones- ty in a greater or less degree is a common sin. But it is a sin which is injurious to the well-being of society, otTen- sive to God, and destructive to the souls of men. The habittial practice of this sin is inconsistent with the chris- tian character i^jaad in vain do any pretend to rehgious experiences and joys, and make a great profession of sanctity, while they can over-reach and deceive their neighbours in their dealings with them. The consideration of the remaining sins against this commandment, which were mentioned, viz. oppression, extortion, and usury, must be postponed until another op- portunity. In the conclusion of this discourse, I would exhort you, and charge mine own soul, while we attend to an illustra- tion of the commandments of God, to examine ourselves, and compare our hearts and lives with what the holy law of God requires; and we shall undoubtedly find, that in many things we all offend. Let us remember that the law is spiritual. Let us admit conviction of sin where we are guilty. Let us remember that the law pronoun- ces, "Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them ;" Gal. iii. 10. Let this teach us that we are condemned by the law, and stand in need of a Saviour. Let a know- ledge of ourselves in contrast with the divine law, drive us to Christ, who is the end of the law for righteousness, to every one that believeth, that we may be justified, through his perfect righteousness. And let us never for- get that although by the deeds of the law no flesh living can be justified, nevertheless, the law continues to be the rule of duty ; that "he that doeth righteousness, is right- eous ;" ] John iii. 7. And that without " holiness," or a sincere obedience to tlie divine commandments, " no man shall see the Lord ;" Heb. xii. 14. SERMON LXXXIV. OPPRESSION, EXTORTION AND USURYi EZEKIEL XXII. 12 ; MIDDLE CLAUSE. " Thou hast taken usunj and increase^ and thou hast greedilif gained of thy neighbours by extortion.'''^ In this chapter the prophet gives a catalogue of the sins of the Jews, which had provoked the heavy judgments of the Lord. In this catalogue are contained, the sins mentioned in our text, viz. extortion and usury. In the last discourse on the eighth commandment, a number of sins against this commandment, were mention- ed all of which were then considered, except the sins oi oppression, extortion, and usury. The object of this dis- course is to treat of these sins. Oppression and extortion are nearly allied, and may be reduced to the same head. Extortion is by civilians de- fined to be, " an abuse of public justice, by any officers unlawfully taking under colour of his office, from any man, any money or thing of value that is not due to him, or more than is due, or before it is due."* But the Scriptures seem not thus to restrict the term ; but to ex- tend it to persons not in office, as well as to those who are. Thus in our text not only the rulers, but the inhabi- tants generally of the city of Jerusalem, are charged with extortion. Extortion in a Scriptural sense appears to be, wresting our neighbour's property from him, either by fraud or by force. Oppression includes extortion, but it goes further ; for we may oppress our neighbour, by withholding his right from him, as well as by taking it a- way. We shall in treating of these sins, consider them togeth- ter ; and as oppression includes extortion, shall make use of the former term. Taking advantage of our neighbour's necessities, to compel him to give an exorbitant price for what he pur- ""Blackstone. 312 SJERMON LXXXlV. chases is oppression. Engrossing or monopolizing coiii* moditics which are the necessaries of life, and then ex- actino; an exorbitant price, especially of the poor, is great oppression. This is what is called in Scripture "grinding the faces of the poor ;" Is. iii. 15. Wresting from our neighbour by violence that which is his, because we are more powerful than he, and because he is afraid to con- tend with us ; also taking advantage of forms of law to wrest or withhold from our neighbour his property ; and further the putting another to the trouble and expense of a law-suit to gain his own right, and protracting the suit to as great length as we can, to run him to as much ex- pense as possible, are oppression. This last is a common mode of oppression, and it is a griev^ous one, and espe- cially' if the person thus wronged be poor, and unable to bear the expense incident to a tedious suit at law. But Ave cannot further particularize. Suffice it to say that every kind of wresting or withholding from our neigh- bour, his property, whether by fraud or by force, is op^ pression. Every kind of oppression, and especially of the poor and more helpless is forbidden in the word of God, and the oppressors are severely threatened. Thus we read, Lev. XXV. 14 ; '• If thou sell ought unto thy neighbour, or buy est ought of thy neighbour's hand, ye shall not op- press one another." The wickedness and danger of op- pression are very frequently pointed out in Scripture. It was one of the sins, for which, as we learn from our text, and elsewhere, God sent his judgments upon the Jews, when their land was desolated, and the inhabitants were either slain or carried captive by the Chaldeans. Zophar in the book of Job speaking of the wicked, said, •• Because he hath oppressed and hath forsaken the poor : because he hath violently taken away an house which he builded not ; surely he shall not feel quietness ; God shall cast the fury of his wrath upon him;'* Job xx. 19, 20, 23. Solomon said, " He that oppresseth the poor, to increase his riches, shall surely come to want ;" Prov. xxii. 16. ''He that oppresseth the poor rcproaclieth his Maker;'' Prov. xiv. 31. "Wo unto them (said Isaiah) that join house to house, that lay field to tield, till there be no place, that they may be placed alone in the midst o>f the earth:'' Is. iv. 8. "Wo nnto them that decree OPPRESSION, EXTORTION AND USURV. 315 unrighteous decrees, and that write grievousness, which they have prescribed ; to turn aside the needy from judg- ment, and to take away the right from the poor of my people, that widows may be their prey, and that they may rob the fatherless ;" Is. x. 1, 2. In the prophecy of Amos we read, " Hear this O ye that swallow up the needy, even to make the poor of the land to fail, saying, when will the new moon be gone, that we may sell corn? And the Sabbath, that we may set forth wheat, making the ephah small, and the shekel great, and falsifying the balances by deceit ? That we may buy the poor for sil- ver, and the needy for a pair of shoes; yea, and sell the refuse of the wheat ? The Lord hath sworn by the excel- lency of Jacob, surely I will never forget any of theirworks. Shall not the land tremble for this, and every one mourn that dwelleth therein ?" Am. viii. 4 — 8. The Lord de- clared by the mouth of the prophet Malachi, " I will come near to you to judgment, and I will be a swift witness a- gainst those that oppress the hireling in his wages, the widow and the fatherless, and that turn aside the stran- ger from his right ;" Mai. iii. 5. Our Saviour pronounced a vvoe against the scribes and Pharisees, because they de- voured widow's houses, and were within, full of extortion. Mat. xxiii. 14, 25. The apostle Paul placed extortioners among those who cannot inherit the kingdom of God ; 1 Cor. vi. 10. And the apostle James denounced the judg- ments of God against oppressors ; " Go to now ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come up* on you. Behold, the hire of the labourers who have reap- ed down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth: and the cries of them which have reaped are en- tered into the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth ;" Jam. v. 1, 4. From these texts, the w ickedness and danger of oppres- sion and extortion are evident. Before we leave this subject, we may remark, how^ good is God, that he befriends the weak and oppressed ! How good are his laws, which thus respect and guard the rights of all his creatures ! And how unreasonable is it, to reject, or hate, or disregard these laws which are so well calculated to promote universal happiness. Let a sense of the excellence of God's law lead us ever to love and obey it. And let oppressors and extortioners remember, that although they may be above the reach of human laws, of VOL. II. 40 314 &'ERMON LXXXIV. may evade them, there is one higher than the highest, who notices their conduct, and to whom it is most dis- pleasing; and who will one day judge the cause of the oppressed, and punish the oppressor ; and let them re- pent, and break off their sins by righteousness. We proceed to the consideration of the other sin men- tioned in our text ; viz. Usury. By usury we understand in general, the compensation which the owner of any thing receives for its use. The term is more especially appropriated to express the com- pensation received for the use of money. On this sul ject there has been and still is a diversity of opinions. Some have supposed all interest for the use of money to be morally unlawful. From Ecclesiastical history we learn that usury, by which most probably is, for the most part, meant, all interest, has been condemned by Ecclesiastical councils, both of primitive and of later times. Many of the Roman Catholic divines, and especially the school- men, as they were called, also held all interest to be mor- ally unlawful. And the Canon law, which contains the opinions of the ancient Latin fathers, and the decrees of general Councils, and of the Popes, forbids any interest for money, and pronounces it a mortal sin. The same opinion, that all interest is morally unlawful, was held by some of the Protestant divines, about the time of the Reformation. Among these we find the name ofthe justly celebrated Swiss reformer, Zuinglius. The same opinion has been held by several eminent divines since. Hence it will be important to inquire whether it is ever morally lawful for the lender to take any interest of the borrower ? All the texts of Scripture which I have been able to find, in which the subject of usury is introduced, and I be- lieve I have found them all, are the following, Ex. xxii. 25 ; " If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shaltnot be to him as an usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury." Lev. xxv. 35, 36, 37 ; " If thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in decay with thee ; then thou shalt relieve him : yea though he be a stranger or a sojourner ; that he may live with thee. Take thou no usury of him, or increase ; but fear thy God ; that thy brother may live with thee. Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase.*" USURY. 315 Dcut. xxiu. 19. 20; "Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury. Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury, but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury." This is all that is said upon the subject in the law of Moses. The next place we find the subject mentioned is in the fifth chapter ofNeheraiah. — The passage is too long to quote entire. The substance o fit is as follows. There was a great scarcity of provis- ions in Judea and the taxes laid by the Persian govern- ment were high. Hence the poorer class of people were obliged to borrow;^money of their richer brethren, for which they charged them an interest of the 100th part, which is supposed to be per month, equal to 12 per cent a year, and to secure the payment of what they thus borrowed, they had to give mortgages on their houses and lands. — This soon reduced the borrowers to poverty and distress. The lenders had got their lands, and they were like- ly to get their children for slaves. In their distress, they cried to Nehemiah the governor. He immediately as- sembled together those who were guilty of this oppression, and said unto them, " Ye exact usury every one of his'brb- ther;" and having expostulated with them, and shown them the evil of their conduct, he added, " I pray you let us leave ofFthis usury. Restore I pray you, to them, even this day, their lands, their vineyards, their olive yards, and their houses, also the hundredth part of the money, and of the corn, the wine, and the oil that ye exact of them. Then said they, we will restore them, and will re- quire nothing of them." Psalm xv. 5 ; The Psalmist gave this as a trait of the character of the good man. " He putteth not out his money to usury." Prov. xxviii. 8 ; we read, " He that by usury and unjust gain increaseth his substance, he shall gather it for him that will pity the poor." Jer. XV. 10; The prophet speaking of the conten- tions of the world with him, observed, " I have neither lent on usury, nor men have lent to me on usury, yet every one of them doth curse me." The next place in which we find the subject mentioned, is in the 18th Chapter of Ezekiel. The prophet describing the just man, said, in the 8th verse — " He that hath not given forth upon usury, neither hath taken any increase." Again describing the wicked man, he gave in the 13tii yerse, 316 SERMON LXXXIV. this as a trait in his character — " Hath given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase," And in the 17th verse spea^ting of a good son of a wicked father, he said, " That hath taken off his hand from the poor, that hath not receiv- ed usury nor increase." The same subject is again men- tioned in our text. *' Thou hast taken usury and increase, and thou hast greedily gained of thy neighbours by extortion." These are all the passages on the subject in the Old Testament. In the New Testament the word usury is but twice mentioned. First in Mat. XXV. 27 ; in the parable of the talents committed to the servants. The master is represented as saying to the unprofitable servant, when reckoning with him, " Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming 1 should have received mine own with usury." The other place in which it is mentioned, is in the same parable ; Luk. xix. 23. In answering the question whether any interest be mor- ally lawful, it will be important to settle the meaning of u- sury in those passages of Scripture, where the word is used. The original word used in the Old Testament, which is rendered usury in our translation, is, I believe, in all the passages quoted, except the one in Nehemiah, derived from a root, which signifies to lite as a serpent. The original word in Nehemiah signifies a burden ; in all the other places, a biting as of a serpent. Hence some have infered, that it is not all interest which is forbidden, and which is called usury ; but only that which proves a bur- den or oppressive ; or that which bites as a serpent, or wastes and by degrees destroys the substance of the bor- rower. But I am inclined to believe, that usury in Scrip- ture, generally, if not always signifies, all interest. In Nehemiah, it is evident that by usury is meant all in- crease, or interest ; for they were required to restore all the gain they had received, viz. the hundredth part of the principal per month. And they said, " We will re- store them, and will require nothing of them." The same appears also from the passages quoted from Leviti- cus and from Ezekiel, where increase is added to usury. Increase, where both terms are used together, seems to refer to provisions, and usury to money; as appears from ^he passage in Leviticus. "Take thou no usury of him or increase." The different meaning of the two terms we USURY, 317 Jearn from what immediately follows. " Thon shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals ibr increase." Hence we may conclude tliat by the usury which is forbidden is meant all gain from money lent, as by the increase forbidden is clearly meant all gain from provisions lent. But notwithstanding this, it does not appear that all in- terest is morally wrong. On the passage in Exodus, " If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer ;" we may observe, that this prohibited the Jews only from taking interest of their own people, and this too, only of those who were poor. And this prohibition seems to imply an allowance to take it of others. 'J here is the same restriction of the prohibition in Leviticus ; " If thy brother be waxen poor — yea though he be a stranger or a sojourner — Take thou no usury of him, or increase." And here the poor stranger and sojourner is mentioned, as to be treated in the same way. The prohibition in Deuteronomy is re- stricted to a brother. And it is added, " Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury." Hence it is evident tliere is nothing morally wrong in interest simply considered ; for if there were, it would be wrong to take it of strangers. It appears that the Jews might take interest of other na- tions, but they must not oppress them, neither might they take any interest of those of them that were poor. With respect to their own nation, all interest was prohibited, at least with respect to those of them who were poor. The prohib,ition to take interest of their own nation generally, if it did extend to the whole nation, which is however douhtful, was, we have reason to believe, a political regu-^ lation, suited, to their particular state. For they were a people not engaged in commerce, neither were they al- lowed to alienate inheritances. As to the other passages which prohibit usury, we ought to explain them in con- sistency with those quoted from the Mosaic law. And hence we learn that interest is not in Scripture, as a gene- ral rule prohibited ; but on the contrary is allowed under certain restrictions. This further appears, from what our Saviour said in the parable of the talents, in which he mentioned the custom of receiving interest to illustrate the duty of the slothful servant. It is not probable, that he would have thus alluded to this custom if the practice 318 SERMON LXXXIV. had been in itself unlawful ; and indeed the force of the comparison is derived from this, that an estate ought to be used to advantage. Besides in a commercial country, borrowing money ap- pears to be necessary to trade ; but there is such a risk in lending, that very few who have money would be willing tolend without the prospect of gain. And further the loan is often a benefit to the borrower. And it does ap- pear clearly to be an equitable principle, that if I am to lie out of the use of my property, and at the same time to run a risk of losing it, while the borrower is increasing his estate with it, I ought to have at least a part of the profits. From the aforementioned considerations,! would draw the conclusion that interest, kept within due bounds,and with the exception of certain cases, which shall in their proper place be mentioned, is morally right. We shall now inquire, what degree of interest is wrong ? Sometimes it is wrong to take any interest. For the Jews were forbidden to take any interest of the poor for the necessaries of life ; but if they were able, it \Vas their du- ty tolend them without the expectation of a reward. The lawof charity teaches christians the same. Yea, it may be our duty sometimes tolend, without expecting to re- ceive the principal again. This is clearly taught by our Saviour, Luk. vi. 35. " Love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the High- est." We are not to suppose that this rule was intended to have a universal application ; for then it would contra- dict other express passages of Scripture ; and also be in . opposition to the plain principles of equity already men- tioned. The meaning must be, that when a man is in ne- cessity, and asks to borrow to meet the present necessity, and we are able to lend him, and can do it without inter- fering with other duties, it is our duty so to do, though it may appear doubtful whether he ever will be able to pay. The only difference between this kind of lending, and a gift is, that in the latter case, we expect no payment on any condition, but in the former we expect, that if the bor- rower ever become able, he will be honest and return the loan. In those cases in which it is morally lawful to take in- terest, how much may be taken ? Supposing no civil laws USURY. 319 regulating the rate of interest, we cannot fix any precise proportion, applicable to all cases. We must carefully avoid oppression. Whenever interest oppresses, and while it enriches the lender, impoverishes the borrower, without any fault of his, it becomes exorbitant and op- pressive, and is highlycriminalin the sight of God. Money loaned ought always to be on such interest, that with pro- per management, the borrower may live as well as the len- der. It may sometimes be more and sometimes, less in- convenient to lend money. The hazard is sometimes greater, and sometimes less, according as the security is more or less certain. These things may properly be ta- ken into the account, and where civil laws do not forbid, interest for the use of money may be regulated according- ly. Hence if the civil laws did not fix the standard of in- l terest, it might at some times be morally lawful to take 1 more than at others, and from some persons than others, according to circumstances. But owing to the corruption of the human heart, and the natural propensity of mankind to get gain, and in- crease their estates, such is the propensity to abuse the I right to take interest, and to oppress in the exercise of this right ; and owing to the frequent temptations to bor- row, and the deceiving nature of interest, such is the proneness of the borrower to submit to the exorbitant de- mands of the lender, to his great injury, if not his ruin in the end, that in most countries, the civil laws have wisely fix- ed a standard of interest. This being fixed, it becomes a moral duty, not to pass this bound. It may be morally wrong, from some persons, and under certain circumstan- ces, to take as much as the law allows. This is always the case, when what is taken, must oppress and impover- ish the borrower while it enriches the lender. Bur although it may be duty sometimes to take less than the law allows, it is sinful to take more, although if there were no law prohibiting, it might conscien- tiously be done. For both the good of society and the laws of God require, that human laws should be obeyed except where they interfere with the rights of conscience, and this too in their spirit as well as their letter. If one man in society has a right to judge of the law, where his self-interest is concerned, whether it be good and ought to be obeyed or not, another has as good a right. If the 320 SERMON LXXXIV. usurer may say that the law which forbids taking interest beyond a certain rate, is not right, and therefore he will violate it, the robber has as good a right to judge that property ought to be common, and that therefore the law which forbids him to take it from his neighbour is wrong and ought not to be obeyed. And so with respect to eve- ry other character and any other law. Hence, the princi- ple, that the laws which we do not like, may be dispensed with, because they stand opposed to our selfish interests, if carried to its legitimate consequences, would fill society with disorder and misery, and destroy civil government. And the example of the usurer, in breaking the laws of his country is peculiarly dangerous, because as hegenerally is a man of considerable property, and as property generally gives influencein society,his*'example is themore dangerous. Hence the good of society forbids the taking of interest proliibited by law; and the man who does it, deserves not the character of a good citizen. But further, the laws of God require obedience to the civil laws. The usurer therefore, apart from the oppres- sion and extortion, which may be connected with the practice, and apart from the evil consequences to society of the principle on which he acts, breaks the law of God, by disregarding and transgressing the laws of his country. This is evident from the following texts, Rom. xiii. 1, 2, 3 ; " Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers ; for there is no power but of God : the powers that be tire ordained ofGod. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power resisteth theordinanceofGod : and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. Wherefore yc must needs be subject, not only ibr wrath, but also for conscience sake." And 1 Pet. ii. 13 ; " Submit your- selves to every ordinance of man, for the Lord's sake." Will the usurer evade the force of these remarks and these texts, by cloaking himself under an observance of the letter of the law, while he violates its spirit and does actually receive more than lawful interest ? Notwith- standing he may evade human penalties, yet the voice of mankind makes him as guilty as though he broke the let- ter of the law. He is a usurer in pubhc estimation, and he is so also in the sight of God, the penalty of whose laws, he cannot evade. From what has been said it appears, that though it be USURY. 321. morally lawful to take interest, it is wrong to take it of the poor : it is also wrong to ask or take such a rate of any per- son, as must be oppression to him, and in the end, while the lender is enriched, the borrower must be impoverish- ed and distressed. The whole tenor of Scripture, which forbids all oppression and extortion, under heavy penal- ties, is against such a rate of interest. And further it is wrong for us, among whom there is a standard of interest fixed by law, ever, either directly or indirectly, to exceed this standard, whether the rate demanded oppress or not. The odiousness and evil of usury,or exorbitant,or unlaw- ful interest, appear, in addition to what has already been said, from other considerations. The etymology of the word in different languages teaches its odious and evil na- ture. The general word in the Hebrew as has already been observed signifies that which bites as a serpent. In the same language, another word is sometimes used which signifies a burden. In the Chaldaic language, the word used signifies corruption, and destruction, because usury wastes and destroys men. The practice has always been odious in popular estimation. Almost all civihzed socie- ties have enacted laws against it. And in the word of God, besides those threatnings which are made against oppression generally, which includes exorbitant interest, we find written, the good man, " putteth not out his money to usury ;" Ps. xv. 5. And, " he that by usury and unjust gain increaseth his substance, he shall gather it for him that will pity the poor ;" Prov. xxviii. 8. These texts, if they do not mean all interest, must undoubtedly at least signify that which is exorbitant. Again Jeremiah, when he expressed his wonder that the world should strive and contend with him, gave as the reason why he wondered, that he was no usurer ; Jer. xv. 10. As though this more than anything else, if he had been guilty of it, would have justified the conduct of the world towards him. In the 18th Chapter of Ezekiel, we find usury mentioned a- niong the most flagitious crimes, as a trait in the character of the w icked man. And I'rom our text we learn, that it was one of those grievous sins, for which God destroyed Jerusalem, desolated Judea, and sent the inhabitants into captivity. Let the usurer seriously consider these things ; study to know what is right, without suffering his judgment to be VOL. IL 41 322 SERMON LXXXV. biassed by self interest ; an<3 knowing his duty, let him as he regards the favour of God, cease to violate his law, re- pent of his former transgressions, and set himself to act a- greeably to the will of God. And let us all guard against such a love of gain, as may lead us to act contrary to ei- ther the letter or spirit of the divine law. — Abien. SERMON LXXXV. NINTH COMMANDMENT LYING. EXODUS XX. 16. ''''•Thou shall not bear false witness agtdnst thy neighbour. ^^ The object of this commandment is, our own and our neighbour's character. The duties required, and the sins forbidden, in this commandment, are staled in our Cate- chism in the answers to the 77th and 78th questions, as fol- lows, viz. " What is required in the ninth commandment ? The ninth commandment requireth the maintaining and pro- moting of truth between man and man, and of our own and our neighboiir^s good name ; especially in ivitness bearing. What is forbidden in the ninth commatuhneni ? The ninth commandment forbiddeth, whatsoever is prejudicial to truth, or injurious to our own or our neighbour''s good name. The great duties required in this commandment are truth, and a regard to reputation. The great sins forbid- den are lying, and slander. These duties and sins may be subdivided into several particulars. With respect to truth, this commandment requires us al- ways to speak it, whether in giving testimony before a court of justice, in common conversation, or in the promises we make ; and also to defend and promote the truth in oth- ers. With respect to lying the opposite of truth, this commandment forbids all falsehood, whether in giving ev- LYING. 323 idence, in common conversation, or in making promises. It also forbids concealing the truth, in giving evidence, when we are bound to declare the whole truth; or con- cealing it though not called upon to declare it, when by such concealment, our neighbour may be injured. And it further forbids, knowingly appearing in favour of an un- just cause, and pleading against the truth, passing unjust sentences contrary to the known truth, forgery, hypocrisy, and all equivocation and mental reservation. With respect to reputation^ this commandment requires in regard to our own good name, that we be careful to conduct in such a manner, as to deserve it, and then that we in a suitable way defend it : and in regard to the good name of others, it requires, that we love, desire, and re- joice in their good ; that we sorrow on account of their infirmities and cover them, unless their o-ood and that of the public, manifestly require that they should be made known; that we defend their innocency when they are unjustly detained ; that we readily receive a good report, and slowly and cautiously admit an evil report concern- ing them : and that we discourage talebearers, and slan- derers. With respect to reputation this commandment for- bids, in regard to our own good name, all such conduct as may justly i-ijure our character in the sight of the world ; in regard to the good name of others, it forbids all slander- ing, I lack biting, detracting, talebearing, unreasonable suspicions, misconstruing intentions, words and actions, unnecessary discovering of intirmities, receiving and coun- tenancing evil reports, and rejoiceing in the disgrace and infamy of others. Having given this brief and general view of this com- mandment, we shall in further attending to it, particularly treat of the two leading sins forbidden by it, viz. lying and slander ; and in doing this we shall naturally attend to the contrary duties. The object of this discourse is to treat of the sin of Ijing. A lie may be defined to be a contradiction of our thoughts, by the signs we make use of to express them. — Agreeably to this definition, a person may be guilty of a lie, when at the same time, that which he utters, proves even- tually to be true. For instance, should a person inform me that a friend would visit me at a certain time, wheu at 324 SERMON LXXXV. the same time, he had no reason to believe, and indeed did not heheve that the event would take place — in such a case, should the event foretold take place, still the per- son who foretold it would be gui hy of a lie, because his words contradicted the thoughts of his mind. And on the other hand a person may utter that which is not really true, provided he believes it to be true, and yet not be guil- ty of a lie. For in such a case, his thoughts and his words would agree, his words would be the index of his mind, and he would only be in a mistake or error. Hence when a person makes to another a promise of any thing, if at the timeof promising he fully intends to perform, though he afterwards fail to fulfil his promise, he"is not guilty of a lie, though he may be criminal in other respects. Again a person may be guilty of lying without using words, viz. by using such signs, or acting in such a manner, pur- posely to deceive, as does deceive another, and lead him to believe what is not true. And here while illustrating the nature of lying, we may further remark, that figurative speeches, such as meta- phors, allegories, irony, and the like, though not literally true, are not lies. We frequently find such figures used in Scripture. Thus Christ is called a stone, a rock, a vine, &c ; and the trees are represented as going forth to anoint a king over them, and addressing the olive, the fig, the vine, and the bramble. In these metaphors and al- legories, the meaning is according to truth, and it is un- derstood, and there is no disagreement between the mind of the speaker, and the sense he would convey. And fre- quently in this figurative way, instruction is conveyed more intelligibly and forcibly, than if the expression had been literal. In irony the gesture and manner of speak- ing evidently convey the meaning of the mind; so that here again, there is no disagreement between the thoughts of the mind and the signs used to convey them, and there- fore no lie. Of this manner of speaking we have several instances in the Scriptures. Lies are usually divided into three kinds. 1. Jocose^ or those which are told with a design to a- muse company, without any intention to profit or hurt, ei- ther ourselves or others. 2. Officious^ or those which are made with a design to excuse or to promote the good of ourselves or others. LYING. 323 3. Pernicious or Malicious made with a design to injure others. With respect to lies of the last class, there can he no dispute as to th<^ir criminality. But some lax casuists have plead in favour of lies of tlie two former classes, and especially of the second, as innocent. It is allowed, there are different degrees of guilt attach- ed to the different species of lying; but every kind is sin- ful. The Scriptures everywhere condemn lying with- out excepting any particular kind. A lie is essentially w rong, and therefore cannot be made right without de- stroying its essence, or its ceasing to be a lie. A lawful lie is as palpable a contradiction, and as great an absur- dity, as to say a lawful sin, or a sinless sin. To the innocence oi jocose lying in particular, we may object, that truth is too sacred, and too important to the well being of society, ever to be trilled with even in jest. Further a trifling with truth in jest, has a tendency to lessen a sense of its sacredness, and therefore to render it easier for persons to falsify the truth in a more important sense. And, again I believe, that a practice of violating the trutli, even in jest, will lessen a person's character, in popular estimation, and if this opinion be correct the criminality of the practice is confirmed by common sense. As to ojjicious lies, or those which are made with a de- sign to excuse or promote the good of ourselves or others ave may argue their criminality from the words of the Apostle, Rom. iii. 8 ; "As we be slanderously repor- ted, and as some affirm that we say, let us do evil, that good may come ; whose damnation is just." The princi- ple on which officious lies are justified is that they are made for a good end, and that the end justifies the means. This is the very principle that the Apostle condemns in the passage just quoted. vSome had reported that (he Apostle himself preached this doctrine ; but he repelled the charge, and called it a slander; and further decla- red their damnation to be just, who acted upon this prin- ciple. Having thus explained the nature and pointed out the different kinds of lying, we proceed to prove the evil of this sin. I. It is contrary to the moral character of God, What- 326 SERMON LXXXV. soever is contrary to God's moral character, as he is inii- jiitelv excellent, must have an intrinsic deformity. Now truth is an essential perfection of God. He is " a God of truth ;" Deut. xxxii. 4. '' Abundant in truth ;" Ex. xxxiv. 6. ''• God is not a man that he should lie, neither the son of a man, that he should repent ; halh he said and shall he not do it ? or hath he spoken and shall he not make it good ;" Num. xxiii. 19. He is a " God that cannot lie ;" Tit. i. 2. Such is the character of God as given to us in the Scriptures. Truth is an essential perfection of God ; and a he is directly the opposite. This teaches us the evil of lying, and its odiousness in the sight of God, v^ho has an infinite love to his perfections, and by consequence an infinite hatred of what is opposed to them, and there- fore has an infinite love to truth and an infinite hatred of a lie. 2. The wickedness of lying is proved by its contrarie- ty to that pattern of excellence Christ Jesus, who is pro- posed to us in the gospel for our imitation, and whose temper and conduct, it is our duty to imitate as far as they are imitable. The Scriptures speak of him as " true;" Mat. xxii. 16. As " the faithful and true witness;" Rev. iii. 14. As "full of grace and and truth;" John i. 14. and as " the truth;" John xiv. 6. 3. A lie assimilates us to Satan, whose character is di- rectly the reverse of every thing that is excellent. Christ spake of him, John viii. 44 ; as follows ; " He was a mur- derer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, be- cause there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own ; for he is a liar, and the father of it." From this text we learn, with whom lying originated, and after whom liars copy. The devil is the father of lies, after liim liars copy, and to him are they by this prac- tice assimilated. 4. Another argument to prove the wickedness of this practice, is, that the word of God expressly forbids lying, and requires truth its opposite; as in the following texts; "Behold thou desirest truth in the inward parts;" Ps. li. 6. "Ye shall not he one to another;" Lev. xix. 1 1. "These things dolh the Lord hate, a lying tongue, a false witness that speaketh lies." Prov. vi. 16. 17, 19. "Lying lips are an ai'omination to the Lord: but they that deal truly are his delight;" Prov. xii. 22. "Putting away lying, speak LYING. 327 every manlnilh with his neighbour; for we arc members one of another;" Eph. \v. 25. •' Lie not one to another;" Col. iii. 9. These are some out of many texts in Scrip- ture, which we find on this subject, and they phiinly teach that it is our duty to speak the truth, and that lying is a great sin. And here it may be important to notice some examples in Scripture of holy men appearing to violate this pre- cept of the moral law. And this is the more necessary, because the examples of such are sometimes construed into a license to sin. But before these examples are ad- duced, it will be proper to remark that " there is not a just man upon earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not;" Eccl. vii. 20. The Scripture saints were, with all their excellencies, but imperfect men. And their fuihngs are faithfully recorded, not for our imitation, but to show us the weakness of human nature, and as cautions to those who think they stand, to take heed lest they fall. Jacob's conduct in obtaining his fathers blessing cannot be justi- fied. It is by no means certain that he was at that time a renewed person ; but if he was, his conduct in that af- fair was a blot upon his character as a pious man. He was guilty of a lie in declaring himself to be Esau. And God permitted him to receive the blessing, not as the re- ward, or in approbation of his deceit ; for, for this he was severely chastised in the disasters which afterwards be- fell him ; but in pursuance of his sovereign purpose, that the elder should serve the younger. The conduct ofRa- hab, in declaring concerning the spies, whom she had concealed, that they had gone out another way, cannot be justified. She also was guilty of a falsehood. And although the Apostle in the epistle to the Hebrews, speaks in commendation of her ; yet it was not for her deception : but for her faith in the threatnings of God against her de- voted city ; and for her love and hospitality towards the people of God. We must form the same judgment, con- demning the conduct of David in what he said to Aliime- lech the priest at Nob ; and also in his feigning himself mad before Achish king of Gath ; and on another occa- sion telling him that he had been against the South of Judah, when he had been spoiling other nations. But there are several instances in Scripture, wherein there may appear to have been a departure from truth in 328 SERMON LXXXV. good men, when indeed there was not. EHsha did not lie, when he told the Syrian soldiers, who were in search of him, " This is not the way, neither is this city ; follow me, and 1 will bring you to the man whom ye seek;" 2 Kings vi. 19. For he had come out of the city, whith- er they were about entering, and if they had gone on in the way they were going, they would not have found him ; and according to his promise, he did bring them to the man whom they sought; for after he had, to show them how easy it was for God to turn their counsels into foolishness, led them to Samaria, he discovered himself to them. It is true, he did not tell them the whole truth ; but this he was not bound to do. Again, Micaiah the prophet, did not lie, when he told king Ahab, in answer to his question, " shall we go against Ramoth-Gilead to battle, or shall we forbear } Go and prosper : for the Lord shall deliver it into the hand of the king;" 1 Kings xxii. 15. For he probably spake ironically and was thus understood by the king. Paul also may be vindicated from the charge of telling a lie, when in reply to the charge of revihng Ananias the high-priest, he said, "I wist not that he was the high-priest :" Acts, xxiii. 5. For we may suppose that he did not know that he was the high-priest. It was a confused assembly, and it is proba- ble that neither the place in which the high-priest sat, nor his dress, at this time designated him ; and Paul had be- come a stranger at Jerusalem ; and the high-priest in these times of tumult was frequently changed. But if he did know him, he may have meant by the expression, that he did not acknowledge hini as the Lord's high-priest. With respect to such instances in Scripture as have al- ready been cited, I would only further observe, that most of them^can be vindicated from the charge of falsehood; and wherever this cannot be done, their conduct must be* condemned, in these particulars, and is not to be consid- ered as an example for our imitation. The Scriptures, while they contain the record of their conduct, in these instances, no where commend it; but on the contrary fre- quently prohibit and condemn all lying, and no where give the least license to the indulgence of this sin. 5. Another argument against lying may be drawn from this consideration, that it is a perversion of the faculty of speech. The power of speech was given to us by the LYING. 329 Creator to be a means of communicating to others the thoughts of our minds. When therefore we use this pow- er for a contrary purpose, we pervert and abuse the gift of God, which is certainly an evil thing. 6. Lying is injurious to the interests of civil society. This the Apostle intimated, when he urged as a motive to speak the truth ; " for we are members one of anoth- er ;" f]ph. iv. 25. Truth between man and man is the bond of social union — without this, men would place no confidence in one another; and a general departure from truth would occasion the greatest confusion, disorder and unhappiness in society. Therefore lying is a very great evil. Indeed it has been considered so pernicious to the interests of civil society, that among the ancient Romans, it is said to have been punished with death. 7. Another argument against lying may be drawn from, a regard to our own character. Notwithstanding the de- pravity of mankind, this vice has been, and still is, in a peculiar manner, branded with infamy by popular opinion. Even they, w ho are themselves addicted to lying, are anx- ious to have others speak the truth, and will esteem a liar less than a man of approved veracity. Yea, lying is so base a vice in popular estimation, that liars themselves cannot bear to be called by the name. A greater affront can scarcely be given to a person than to call him a liar; nor will any affront be sooner resented. Now, if the name be so odious, the thing itself must be far more so. Solo- mon said '• The lip of truth shall be established forever: but a lying tongue is but for a moment;'' Prov. xii. 19. The truth of this saying our own observation has doubt- less confirmed. Whatever advantage a person may gain by falsehood, if he is detected as is generally the case, his advantage will be but momentary: he purchases it at the expense of his reputation, which he will not easily re- deem. For being once detected in a falsehood, he will be viewed with suspicion, and will scarcely gain belief when he speaks the truth. a. Once more, the evil nature of this sin is proved by this consideration, unless it is repented of and forsaken, it will bring down the wrath of God upon the person guilty of it, and issue in his everlasting destruction. Thus we read, " thou (that is the Lord) shalt destroy them that speak leasing;" that is falsehood; Ps. v. 6. " For our?*' VOL. u. 12 330 SERMON LXXXV. ing and lying which they speak, consume them in wrath;" Ps. Lix. 12, 13. " He that speaketh lies shall not escape- he that speaketh lies shall perish ;" Prov. xix. 5, 9. 'There shall in no wise enter into it (that is the heavenly Jerusa- lem) any thing that maketh a lie ;" Rev. xxi. 27. " With- out are, whosoever loveth and maketh a lie ;" Rev. xxii. 15. "All liars shall have their part in the lake which burnetii with fire and brimstone ; which is the second death ;" Rev. xxi. 8. Such are the threatenings of the God of truth against those who practice the sin of lying; and such is the doom of liars. God will destroy them ; he will consume them in wrath; they shall not escape; they shall perish ; they shall be shut out of heaven ; and they shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire ■and brimstone. How odious and how dangerous is this sin ! It is con- trary to the character of God, and the example of Christ. It likens a person to Satan. It is a violation of God's law repeatedly expressed. It is a perversion of the faculty of speech. It is injurious to the interests of civil society. It is ruinous to character, and exposes to the contempt of men in this world. And it will unless repented of and forsaken, assuredly draw down the vengeance of God on ihe person guilty of it, and issue in his everlasting des- truction in the future world. " Such a horrid monster (says one*) is this vice in all its shapes, that it needs only to be seen, that it may be hated — only to be discovered that it may be detested. What a detestable wretch then is a liar! suspected by all, despised by the good, the contempt of the bad, a coward through lite, a monster in death, and a miserable outcast in eternity." Are there any present addicted to this sin ? Let them reflect on these things, and be filled with an abhorrence of this vice, repent of it, and forsake it. This sin as well as others w^ll be forgiven on true repentance. And let What has been said, influence us all, ever, sa- credly to adhere to the truth in all our intercourse with the world. Let us carefully guard against the causes which may lead to this sin ; such as pride and vanity, which may tempt to magnify relations concerning our- selves, covetousness which may excite to falsehood for *Sec Churchman'' s Mag. vol. 2. pag. 280. EVIL SPEAKING. 331 the sake of gain, distrust of the Lord which doubtless of- ten leads to lying to avoid some threatening calamity, the fear of man which bringeth a snare, and those crimes which are esteemed peculiarly disgraceful among men, and which tempt the perpetrators to falsehood to prevent their discovery. And let us always remember, when tempted to swerve from the truth, that God seeth us, and knoweth our hearts — that although we may deceive men, we cannot deceive him ; and that by lying, to prevent dis- covery from men, we run into a far greater evil, by sub- jecting ourselves to the wrath of Ciod. May the Lord write his law upon our hearts; and es- pecially may he till us witli an abhorrence of lying, and a love of truth ; and by his grace help us ever to adhere to the truth — Amen. SERMON LXXXVI. EVIL SPEAKING. JAMES IV. IL FIRST CLAUSE. " Speak not evil one of another, brethren^ At the time when James wrote this epistle, the sins of the tongue appear to have been very prevalent. Hence, in his epistle, he several times spake of the sins commit- ted by the tongue, and pointed out their evils, and warn- ed against them. The sins committed by the tongue are nu- merous. Blasphemy, perjury, profane swearing, cursing, lying, and many others belong to this class ; as also does speaking evil of our neighbour. It was against the last mentioned sin of the tongue that James exhorted in our text " Speak not evil one of another, brethren." This exhortation is addressed to us, and we have need of it, as well as those to whom the Apostle wrote. Evil speaking is a sin, to which mankind have always had a propensity ; and perhaps few sins have done, or do, much 332 SEKMON LXXXVI. more mischief in society than this. Persons indulge theni^ fcelves in this vice from different causes. In some it ari- ses from a barrenness of mind ; their knowledge scarcely extends beyond the scandals of the day, and they would have nothing to say in company, if they were not to talk of what they have seen and fieard about their neighhours. In some it arises from a fondness of telling news, connect- ed with a lively fancy, and a love of the marvellous, which prompts them to embellish their tale by making some ad- ditions, to what they really heard or saw. And in some it arises from an envious, censorious, or malicious disposi- tion, which delights in injuring others. All who indulge in evil speaking from any of these causes, are ciminal, though they are the most criminal who are influenced by the last mentioned cause. Evil speaking belongs to the sins forbidden by the ninth commandment. Under evil speaking are included a num- ber of particulars, such as detraction, slander or calum- ny, back-biting, and tale-bearing or tatthng. Detraction signifies the telling such things of another as may take from his reputation, or lessen his character. Slander or calumny signifies charging a person falsely with some- thing disgraceful, whether it l)e done in his presence or absence. Back-biting is a speaking to the injury of our neighbour behind his back, or when he is absent. And tale-bearing or tattling is a carrying those things we see and hear in one house or company to another, or a tell- ing others what we have heard their neighbours say of them. Speaking evil of others, when what we say, we know to be false or in any degree false, being exaggerated beyond * the truth, as is almost always the case with the true sto- ries which go from hand to hand, is wrong. Such evil' speaking is not only detraction but lying, and therefore is a complicated wickedness. Again it is wrong to speak- to the injury of others, when we believe what we say is ■ true, unless the fact be clearly ascertained. A man's character is very dear and of great importance to him, and we ought never to say any thing to the injury of his character, unless we are sure of its truth ; for it may be false, and then we would be the instruments of blasting the reputation of the innocent. Have we heard it frorii- others ? they may be prejudiced, or they may be under: EVIL SPEAKING. 333 a mistake, or they may have intended to slander, or they may be too credulous, and may have taken up the re- port without sufficiently investigating whether it was foun- ded in truth. Have we taken up the story from com- mon fame, and do we relate it on this authority ? it is cer- tain that common fame is a very great liar. We have oiten known stories which have been industriously circulated, and firmly believed, prove to be untounded, when they have been investigated. The history of judicial pro- ceedings, furnish numerous instances in confirmation of the trutli of this remark. And it has often been proved ilmt accusations which tended to blast a man's character, were false, when evidence was exceedingly strong against him. For instance, evidence was exceedingly strong against Joseph, when he was accused by his mistress to Fotiphar; for she had his garment in her possession as a proof of his guilt. Such instances teach us that we ought lo proceed with extreme caution, in taking up, and cir^ culating an evil report to the injury of our neighbour. — Agiin, when we are convinced, that a person has been guilty of doing thatwliichis wrong; when we have been eye or ear witness of his wickedness, or have such a clear evidence of it as leaves no room to doubt, still it is wrong to divulge what we know, except under certain circum- stances. To tell it through malace or envy^ with a design lo injure our neighbour ; or to divulge it merely to gratify a propensity to tattle and tell news, is wrong. But if, while we pity our neighbour, and are sorry for his con- duct, we divulge his failings for his good, or for the pub- lic good, or for our own defence or the defence of the in- nocent, our conduct is correct. It may sometimes be ne- cessary for the reformation of the offender that his crimes be divulged ; but in this case we ought first to use pri- vate means, to lead him to repentance and reformation, and not to expose him in public, until private means have failed. Sometimes the public good may require that a manV crimes should be divulged, that he may be brought to justice, thai the public may be put on their guard a- gainst him, and that he may be prevented fi'om doing more mischief. And sometimes the innocent, and even we ourselves may be charged with crimes which we know have been committed by another person — m such a case it is correct, and our dutv to discover the guilty, that the in- ;j34 SERMON LXXXVl. nocentmay be cleared. But except in these cases, vi>here the reformation of the oifender, or the public good, or the clearing of the innocent require it, it is wrong to report even the truth to the hurt of our neighbour ; and much more is it wrong, readilj to take up an evil report of our neighbour, and spread it without any certainty wheth- er it be true or false ; and still worse is it to invent sland- erous tales concerning others, and propagate them to the injury of their good name. But alas ! there are many in our world who act thus. — There are many, who invent falsehoods respecting oth- ers, and with a malignant pleasure tell them to gratify a malicious, revengeful, or envious disposition. There are Uiduy who ascribe their neighbour's conduct to bad mo- tives, and undertake to judge and condemn them. There are many who unwillingly receive a good report concern- ing their neighbour ; but who eagerly receive, and read- ily believe, and with satisfaction spread, an evil report* 1 here are many who say behind a neighbour's back what they would not dare to say to his face ; and often too, preface what they say with making some observations ia his praise, and then expressing their sorrow that he has acted thus, and thus, in a particular instance ; when their preface and their feigned sorrow are only intended to render their slander the more palatable, and inflict the deeper wound on his reputation. There are many who thus stab their neigbour in secret, and he knows not whence the blow comes, or how to meet it and defend his injured character. The midnight assassin is but a shade more guilty than such an one ; for he that murders my reputation, might almost as well take my life. And there are many who go from house to house and from company to company, and carry with large additions what they have heard dropped in an unguarded moment, with- out any intention of injuring another. If it were possible, our doors ought to be shut against such tattlers, and tale- bearers ; and they ought to be excluded the social cir- cle, that they may not disturb the peace of society. The wickedness of evil speaking may be proved from several considerations. 1. It is directly opposed to that charity or love towards our neighbour, which is frequently enjoined in Scripture. We are commanded, '• Thou shalt love tliy neighbour as EVIL SPEAKING. 335 thyself;" Mat. xix. 19. " Alllhings whatsoever ye would that men should do to you do ye even so to them ;" Mat. vii. 12. Evil speaking is doubtless opposed to these pre- cepts. Slanderers and back- biters, certainly, would not be willing that the same liberty should be taken with their characters, as they take with those of others. And it would be a good rule, under which always to act, when prompted to talk to the injury of our neighbours, not to say any thing, but what we would be willing they should say of us with equal foundation. If this rule were univer- sally adhered to, there would be but very little evil speak- ing in our world, and but few of those many evils which now arise in society from talking about others. Again, we are tauglit in the Scriptures that " love worketh no ill to his neighbour." Rom. xiii. 10. And that, that clmrity without which we are nothirig, " suffereth long, and is kind, envieth not, thinketh no evil, rejoiceth not in iniqui- ty, but rejoiceth in the truth, believeth all things, hopeth all things ;" 1 Cor. xiii. 4, 5, 6, 7. Of this charity or love to our neighbour, evil speaking is a breach. Fui" ther, we are exhorted — " Put on therefore (as the elect of God holy and beloved) bowels of mercies, kindness, for- bearing one another. And above all things, put on char- ity which is the bond of perfectness ;" Col. iii. 12, 13, 14. " And be ye kind one to another, tender hearted forgiving one another; Eph. iv. 32. " And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us." Eph. v. 2. Most assured- ly evil speaking is directly the opposite of the duties en- joined in these texts, aid therefore must be wrong. 2. Evil speaking is forbidden not only by consequence drawn from required duties, l)ut also expressly, and this too repeatedly, as in the following texts. In the law of Moses we read, " thou slialt not raise a false report ; Ex. xxiii. 1. " Thou shalt not go up and down as a tale-bearer among thy people ;" Lev. xix. 1 6. The Psalmist describing a good man, said, " He that back-bitethnot with his tongue, nor doth evil to his neigh- bour, nor taketh up a reproach against his neighbour." Ps. XV. 3. In another place he gave the following as a trait in the character of the wicked man, " Thou sittest and speakest against thy brother : thou slanderest thine own mother's son ;" Ps. l. 20. Again, speaking in his character of civil ruler, he said, " Whoso privily slander* 336 SERMON LXXXVI. eth his neighbour, him will I cut off;" Ps. ci. 5. And in another place he snid," let not an evil speaker be estab- lished in the earth ;"" Ps. cxL. 11. Solomon said, "a wick- ed man walkcth with a froward mouth. Frowardness is 1n his heart, he deviseth mischief continually, he soweth discord. These six things doth the Lord hate; jea, se- ven are an abomination unto him." One of them is, ''him that soweth discord among brethren ;" Prov. vi. 12. 14, 16, 19. " He that hideth hatred with lying lips, and he that uttereth a slander, is a fool;" Prov. x. 18. "A froward man soweth strife, and a whisperer separateth chief friends ;" Prov. xvi. 28. Paul in that dreadful cat- alogue of the sins of the gentiles, whom God had given over to a reprobate mind, contained, Rom. i. 29, &:c. in- cluded " whisperers, and back-biters." He exhorted the Ephesians, " Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you ;" Eph. iv. 31. And he exhorted Titus to remind his hearers, " To speak evil of no man, to be no brawlers ;" Tit. iii. 2. And Peter exhorted, " laying aside all evil speakings;" 1 Pet. ii. 1. These texts show that the sin of which we are treating is repeatedly forbidden in the word of God. 3. Another reason against evil speaking is, that it is as- suming the prerogative of judging and condemning which does not belong to us ; and this too contrary to all justice, without hearing the accused party. Evil speakers, of- tentimes and generally decide that a man has done wrong without waiting to hear his defence ; and having thus par- tially judged that he has done wrong, they proceed to pronounce him a bad man, and to condemn hjm to a loss of reputation, and to execute the sentence, by proclaim- ing to the world as true, the opinion they have formed of his character. This is contrary to the universally ac- knowledged principles of justice. A man may deserve to have property taken from him ; but no individual has a right to take it away ; he cannot be deprived of it, until the cause has been tried in a court of justice, and after having had an opportunity to defend himself, has had a decision given against him. And cannot a man's proper ty be justly wrested from him by individuals, nor by the •public, without an opportunity of defending himself? And can individuals have a rio;ht to take a man's crharacter EVIL SPEAKING. 337 irom him, as slanderers and back-biters do, without giv- ing him an opportunity, first, to defend himself? It can- not be that they can justly do this. For character is of as much and more importance than property. This rash and private judging and condemning, of which evil speakers are guilty, is frequently condemned in the Scriptures. Thus immediately following our text, we read,*' He that speaketh evil of hisbrother, and judg- eth his brother, speaketh evil of the law and judgeth the law : but if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge. There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy : who art thou that judgcstanother." To the same purpose our Saviour spake, " Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall bejudged : and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye.'^" Mat. vii. 1, 2, 3. And Paul said, "Thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest ; for wherein thou judgest another thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest, dost the same things;" Rom. ii. 1. " Who art thou that judgest anoth- er man's servant ? To his own master he standeth or fal- leth ;" Rom. xiv. 4. " Judge nothing before the time, un- til the Lord come, who both will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts ;" 1 Cor. iv. .5. These texts evidently teach, that we ought to be, at least very cautious about ascribing the actions of men to bad motives, and forming a bad opinion of their conduct ; and that we ought to avoid all rash and precipitate judg- ment, and much more expressing such a judgment to the disadvantage of others. Hence, in these verses; evil speaking is evidently condemned ; and it is in- timated that those who speak evil of others, are often- times guilty themselves of tliose very things, which they so severely censure in others, and we have reason to believe that generally, they who are most forward to scan- dalize their neighbours, are most guilty themselves. They behold the mote in their brother's eye, but consider -not the beam that is in their own eye. " Thou hypocrite (said our Saviour to such) first cast out the beam out of thine own eye ; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out VOL. IT. 4.*i 338 SERMON LXXXVI. the mote out of thy brother's eye ;" Mat. vli. 5. If, my hearers, we were to look more at ourselves, we would pro- bably see less reason to be dwelling on our neighbour's faults. 4. Another reason against speaking evil of others, is the evil consequences which result from this practice. It is the cause of a flood of evils in society. James, speak- ing of the abuses of the tongue, said, " Beliold how great a matter a little fire kindleth ! And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue amongst our mem- bers, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature ; and is set on fire of hell. The tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of dead- ly poison." Jam. iii. 5, 6, 8. In this passage, the tongue which is the instrument in slandering, back-biting, and tale-bearing is called a fire ; and from the same passage we learn, whence this fire is kindled — it is set on fire of hell. Evil speaking has its origin from hell, and is the fruit of the temper of hell residing in the heart. And in this same passage are pointed out the great evils produ- ced by this vice. It is a little fire which kindleth a great matter ; it setteth on fire the course of nature ; and it is a deadly poison. Evil speaking has injured and destroy- ed many characters ; and this too of the innocent. It has sown discord in families, neighbourhoods, and societies. The most tragical events have sometimes resulted from it ; and it has been and still is one of the most fruitful sources of the jarrings and contentions in the world. And is this the case, and must not the conduct which produces so much mischief be very wicked .'"' 5. Another argument against this vice may be drawn from the common sense of mankind. Notwithstanding they are so prone to listen to, and practice evil speak- ing, yet the detractor, the slanderer, the back-biter and the tale bearer, are odious characters in common estima- tion. And even they who are addicted to these vices, are very unwilhng to bear the names. 6. I mention one other argument against this vice, and that is, it is a soul destroying sin. A good man may some- times, through inattention, or in the hurry of conversa- tion transgress in this respect, as well as in others ; but they who habitually indulge themselves in this iniqui- ty, whatever their profession may be, certainly cannot bf EVIL SPEAKING. 339 the people of God, but must be children of wrath. This is clearly evident from some of those texts which have al- ready been quoted. We are expressly told without char- ity or love, we are " as sounding brass, or a tinkling cytn- bal,'' and "nothing;" 1 Cor. xiii. 1, 2. But he who ha- bitually indulges himself iri this vice, must he destitute of this charity ; for this charity " is kind, envieth not, think- eth no evil, rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth, believeth all things, hopeth all things;" 1 Cor. xiii. 4, &;c. The habitually evil speaker, cer- tainly caimot have this charity ; and therefore, what- ever be his professions and hopes, he is nothing.-— The Psalmist describing the good man who shall dwell in the holy hill of God, or heaven, gave the following as a trait in his character, "he back-biteth not with his tongue nor taketh up a reproach against his neighbour; " p6. XV. 3. From this text it appears that the back-biter cannot dwell in the holy hill of God, and therefore must be in a graceless state. Again, the w ise man gave as a trait in the character of the wicked man, " he soweth dis- cord ;" Prov. vi. 14. And he called him " that uttereth a slander a fool ;" Prov. x. 18. By which he meant a wicked man. And JameS wrote, " if any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth hisown heart, tliis man's rehgionis vain." Jam., i. 26. In these texts the evil speaker may see his char- acter and situation. He is a wicked man ; and he is yet under the wrath of God, and in danger of everlasting mis- ery, wliicli will certainly be his portion unless he repents of, and forsakes the habitual indulgence of this sin as well as every other. Are there any present, addicted to this vice. Are there present any detractors, slanderers, or back-biters, who indulge themselves in speaking evil of their neigh- bours.'^ Who invent slanders and report them.'* Whose cars are open to the tongue of calumny, and who readily take up an ill report against their neighbours, and spread it to their hurt ? Are there present any tale-bearers, who go from house to house, to carry from one to the other what they hear and see ; and who tell to those with whom they are, what they have heard others say about them, and perhaps gloss over what they have to say with a pretence ©f friendship ? Are there any such characters present ? 340 bERMON LXXXVI. Let them seriously consider the arguments, which have been offered against this practice. God repeatedly for- bids it in his word, and requires the opposite temper and conduct. It is contrary to the principles of justice, and is assuming a prerogative which does not belong to you. It is most pernicious in its consequences, blasting a man's character, sowing discord in society, and setting on fire the course of nature. It is odious in popular estimation. And the practice unless repented of and forsaken will assu- redly destroy your souls forever. These are weighty con- siderations. Let them have their due weight upon your minds, and lead you to be ashamed ofyour past conduct, repent of it and forsake it. Brethren, I want language to pourtray this vice in its truly odious colours. Permit me to adopt the language of another, the elegant Hunter in his conclusion of the histo- tory of Cain. " Hold thy bloody hand, son, daughter of murderous Cain ! Why should a brother, a sister fall by it! That furious look is a dagger ; that unkind word has made the blood, the hearts blood to follow it. Daughter of murderous Cain ! A female hand armed with a sword, lifted up to slay, dipped in blood ! No, she wields a more deadly weapon, she brandishes an envenomed tongue : poison more fatal than that of asps is under her lips; it is not the body that suffers, when that unruly mem- ber moves ; it is the spirit, it is the spirit that bleeds : the man dies, and sees not who it was that hurt him ; he perishes in the best part of himself, his good name is blasted ; and what has he left worth possessing ? The sight of a httle material blood makes her faint: a dead corpse terrifies and shocks her ; but she can calmly and with delight sit down to that horrid human sacrifice, a murdered, mangled reputation." Brethren, what a shocking picture is this ! Where is the original } Is it to be found among men ? Yes. In civ- ilized society ^ Yes. Yea among those who would be classed with refined society, as well as among the more vulgar. And what may well be still more astonishing, it is not confined to the more robust and less tender sex, but is found among that sex where we naturally look for more tenderness. My hearers, be shocked at the picture and shun this detestable and hurtful vice of speaking evil of others. May we all be enabled to put away and avoid TENTH COMMANDMENT. 341 all evil speaking, to put on charity whicli is the bond of perfectness, to be kind and tender-hearted one to anoth- er, and to walk in that brotherly love which worketh no ill to our neighbour. — Amen. SERMON LXXXVII. TENTH COMMANDMENT. EXODUS XX. 17. " Thou shall not covet thy neighbour's housc^ thuu shalt not covet thy neighbour'^s wife^ nor his man-servmit, nor his maid- servant^ nor his ox^ nor his asSj nor any thing that is thy neighs hour'^s.^'' The object of this commandment appears to be, to re- gulate, and set bounds to our desires ; and especiaUy to restrain us from improper feelings towards others, or de- sires of those things which belong: to them. Or, in other words, this commandment requires a suitable irame oi mind in regard to the Providence of Ciod, with respect to both ourselves and others, and prohibits the contrary. — This explication is agreeable to the sense in which the authors of our excellent Catechism understood this com- mandment. According to them, " The tenth commandment requireth full contentment, with our own coyidition^ icith a right and charitable frame of spirit toivard our neighbour and all that is his.'''' " The tenth commandment forbiddeth all discontentment ivith our own estate^ envying or grieving at the good of our neigh- bour, and aliinordinate motions or affections to any thing that is hisy According to this explanation, the duties required in this commandment are, with respect to ourselves, con- tentment with our condition; and with respect toothers, a right and charitable frame of spirit towards them and theirs ; and the sins forbidden are, with respect to cm*- selves discontentment ; and with respect to others envy^ and all inordinate motions or afiections to any thing that is theirs. I. Let us attend to the duties required in this command- ment. And, 1. With respect to ourselves, this commandment re- quires contentment with our own condition. By contentment is meant an acquiescence in the allot- ments of Providence with respect to ourselves, and a com- posed and satisfied frame of mind in the condition in which we may be placed. This contentment is a duty, whether we have little or much ; and whether we are in adversity or prosperity. If facts did not prove the con- trary, we should readily suppose, that it would be very easy to be contented in prosperity, when we abound in the good things of this life. But it is a fact, that frequent- ly, as little contentment is found, among the rich and prosperous, as among the poor and distressed. Yea, we often see more contentment in the cottage than in the pal- ace. And, not unfrequently, we find, that craving de- sires after more of the things of this world, and discon- tentment with present condition, increase in proportion as substance ijicreases. Hence, they who are prosper- ous in the world have much need to be exhorted to con- tentment with tlieir condition. With respect to the poor and afthctcd, it is their duty also, notwithstanding their Bituation, to be contented ; or, to acquiesce in the disposal of divine Providence, be resigned to his will, and patiently suffer those things which he lays upon them. But while contentment is our duty in every situation, it is proper to be joyful in prosperity, and to sorrow in adver- sity. Revealed religion does not require men to be Sto- ics, or to be insensible to pleasure and pain, and make no difference between the smiles and frownsof divine Provi- dence, It is consistent also with contentment with our condition to desire to have prosperity and to avoid adver- sity, and to pray to enjoy the former, and to be delivered from the latter ; but always with submission to the divine will. Thus, our Saviour was not insensible to his suffer- ings in the garden ; but his soul was exceeding sorrow- ful even unto death;" iMat. xxvi. 38. And he desired to be delivered from his sufferings, " and prayed O my Fa- TENTH COMMANDMENT. 343 ther, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me." But still he was contented, or resigned and submissive to the will of (lod. " Nevertheless, not as 1 will but as thou wilt,' was his language — Mat. xxvi. 39. Again it is consistent with contentment, to use means to obtain prosperity in the world, and to avoid or to be delivered out of adversi- ty; but still with a spirit of submission to the will ofGod, if he sees fit not to crown these means with success. The duty ot contentment with our condition is clearly enjoined in the Scriptures, as in the following texts. — ** Having food and raiment, let us be therewith content;" 1 Tim. vi. 8. '• Let your conversation be without cove- tousness ; and be content with such things as ye have ;" Heb. xiii. 5. *•' I have learned, in whatsoever state I am, therewith to be content. I know both how to be abased, and I know how to abound : every where and in all things, I am instructed both to be full and to be hungry, both to abound and to suffer need;" Phil. iv. II, 12. There are many motives to contentment with our con- dition, even when we are poor and afflicted. Our con- dition in this world, whatever it maybe, is far better thac we deserve. Eternal misery is our just desert, and what- ever is short of this is better than we deserve. Besides there are scarcely any so afflicted, but they have many mercies left, the least of which is greater than they de- serve ; and this should make them contented with the al- lotments of Providence. Further we have the command of God and the examples of Christ and the saints to in- fluence us to resignation. And afflictions have often prov- ed blessings, to those exercised with them, and may and will prove so to us, if we improve them aright. And it" we be God's people, he has placed us in that situation, which in his unerring wisdom, and unchanging love, he sees best for us. And he has told us in his word, "that all things work together for good to them that love God ;" Rom. viii. 28. And soon will these trials be at an end — and " there remaineth a rest to the people of God :" Heb. iv. 9. Yea, we are told, " Our light affliction which is but for a moment, worketh for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory;" 2 Cor. iv. 17. Such are the motives which urge to contentment, with our condition, though we be in an afflicted state. And besides all these we may observe, that contentment is its own reward. \ 344 SERMON LXXXVII. contented mind is calm and at rest, while the discontent- ed are like the troubled sea, when it cannot rest. Hap- piness which is so much desired by all, and after which all are aiming, does not depend so much on external circum- stances, as on the state of the mind. If we are content- ed in our minds we shall be happy in any condition; but if we are discontented we must be unhappy in the most prosperous external circumstances. The 2nd duty required in this commandment is '•''aright and charitabk frame of spirit toward our neighbour and all that is hisy This consists in desiring the prosperity of others : and being pleased with and delighting in their prosperity, though they are more wise, rich, esteemed, and prosper- ous, than we ; and grieving for them when they are brought into adversity. Agreeably to this, we are directed, " Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself;" Mat. xix. 19. " Re- joice with them that do rejoice, and weep with them that weep ;" Rom. xii. 1 5. " Remember them that are in bonds as bound with them ; and them which suffer ad- versity, as being yourselves also in the body ;" Heb. xiii. 3. '• Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others ;" Phil. ii. 4. " Let no man seek his own, but every man another's wealth ;" 1. Cor. X. 24. "By love serve one another ;" Gal. v. 13. "Bear ye one another's burdens and so fulfil the law of Christ;" Gal. vi. 2. These texts abundantly teach us, that we ought to seek our neighbour's good as well as our own, take an interest in his welfare, rejoice in his prosperity, and sympathize with him in his adversity. We proceed, II. To consider the sins forbidden in the tenth com- mandment. These are discontentment, envy, and all in- ordinate motions or affections to any thing that is our neighbours. \. Discontentment with our own estate or condition. This is what is forbidden in this commandment with res- pect to ourselves. The discontented person is not satis- lied, but displeased with his present situation. He is im- patient and unsubmissive under afflictions. He ofteii magnifies imaginary into real, and light into heavy afflic- tions. He is uneasy and fretful, and he murmurs and re- pines at the providences of God. This frame of mind is vfTv (li^;pleasi^s• lo God. Di'^contentment with onr con- TENTH COMMANDMENT. 345 dition is wicked. It is contrary to the will of God, clear- ly made known in his word. It is opposed to the exam* pie of patience and resignation which our divine Redeem- er has set us, that we should walk in his steps. It argues great unthankfulness for the mercies we have received, and which we at present enjoy, the least of which is more than we deserve. And especially is there great in- gratitude in the discontentment of those, who are in a comfortable and prosperous condition in the world. Fur- ther, discontentment ^\ith our condition, is a prizing this world too highly, and exalting it in our estimation above the favour of God, which is very wicked. It also argues great pride of heart, as though we felt we deserved a bet- ter portion in this world from the hands of Providence.-^ And it is also, an impeachment of divine Providence, and a distrust in God, as though he did not order things aright and we could order them Iffetter, and it was not safe to trust ourselves in his hands. From all these considera- tions, we learn that discontentment is a complicated wick- edness. But it is difficult to convince men of this. Like Jonah in Nineveh, when his gourd withered, and the Lord, reproved him for his discontentment, by asking him, "Doest thou well to be angry for the gourd .^" And he rephed in a petulant manner, "I do well to be angry even unto death;" Jon. iv. 9. So the discontented are apt to justify them- selves for indulging such a frame of spirit. When they are reproved for their discontentment, some plead their natural temper and excuse themselves on this ground ; but this temper is wrong andotlensive to God, and therefore cannot form a just excuse for those sins which flow from it. Some plead the greatness of their affliction as a jus- tification of their discontentment ; but such a plea ought to be forever silenced, by the consideration that our hea- viest afflictions are far less than we deserve. Some again plead that their affliction was unexpected, and there fore they were unprepared to bear it. But to this it may be answered, that as we live in a world of trial, we ought to be always prepared to meet afflictions. And it is no new thing that trials should come suddenly. Some of the best of men have been visited with sudden and un- expected trials, and yet have been patient and resigned under them. For instance. Job beheld himself in one day, precipitated from great prosperity » into poverty, and VOL. II. 11 346 SERMON Lxxxvn. loathsome and painful disease, and bereft of ten chileren, . all he had ; but still he said, " the Lord gave and the Lord hath taken away ; blessed be the name of the Lord ;" Job i. 21. Discontentment is wrong in every situation, and it is its own punishment. A discontented state of mind renders a person very unhappy, while the contrary grace of contentment greatly alleviates afflictions. Be- sides discontentment cannot alter things, or render them better, but makes them worse, both by unfitting a person to take the proper means to better his condition, and by provoking the displeasure of God ; whereas contentment renders the mind calm and collected, and is the best way to secure the blessing of God on our endeavours to im- prove our condition. 2. Another sin forbidden by this commandment is envy. This has others for its object. By envy is meant an un- easiness or grieving at the prosperity of others, accompa- nied with ill will towiirds them. The object which ex- cites it is superiority in others, whether this superiority consists in riches, in success in business, in honour, in popularity, in wisdom, in beauty, or in any thing else. — This is one of the most hateful passions that can he har- boured in the human breast. To exercise, or harbour ill "will towards one who' has done us no injury, only because a sovereign God has made him in any respect superior to us, or because he has been more prosperous in the world than we, and this too perhaps, the result of his own prudence and dihgence. What passion can be more o- dious, and more deserving of universal detestation ? And it is detested by mankind, and in others even by those who harbour it in their own bosoms. But still many in- dulge this hateful passion, though they are unwilling to acknowledge it, and may endeavour to conceal it. Envy has done a vast deal of mischief in our world. It was en- vy in Cain, because his brother was more righteous than he, that led him to hate and finally to kill him. It was envy that led the sons of Jacob, because Joseph was deser- vedly the beloved of his Father, and because his dreams predicted his future greatness, to hate him, to plot his ru- in, to cast him into a pit, and to sell him into Egypt. It was through envy, as one cause, that the Pharisees and chief of the Jews, conspired against Christ, and finally put him to death. Both sacred and profane history a- TENTH COMMANDMENT. 347 bound with instances which show the diabohcal nature of envy, and the dreadful mischiefs to which it leads. It has led to slander and detraction. It has blasted the fair reputation of the innocent. It has led to take satisfaction in the downfall and misery of oth' ers. It has led to desire the death of others, and to re- joice in it. Yea, it has led to the most infernal plots, to" take away the life of its object, and has often issued in murder. And in addition to all this, it will finally issue in the everlasting destruction of those who cherish it, un- less repented of and forsaken. Thisdreadful consequence of envy is evident from the word of God. In that cata> logue of sins, which the apostle Paul Rom. chap. i. char- ged upon the gentile world and for which God had giv- en them over to a reprobate mind he included " envy." Again in that catalogue of sins, Gal. chap. v. concerning which he told the Galatians, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God, he included "envyings. To the Corinthians he wrote," whereas there is among you envying, are ye not carnal ?''"' 1 Cor. iii. .3. And in the same epistle, describing that charity, without which we are nothing, he said it " envieth not ;" 1 Cor. xiii. 4. And James hath told us, " If ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth. This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish. For where envy- ing and strife is, there is confusion, and every evil work ;"' Jam. iii. 14, &c. From what has been said, we must be convinced of the odiousneis, wickedness, and danger of the sin of envy. — Let us be cautioned to guard against it ; and if we now feel an envious spirit towards any, let us repent of, and forsake this great sin. 3. The last class of sins forbidden by the tenth com- mandment is all inordinate motions or affections to any thing that belongs to our neighbour. This class of sins, may be denominated covetousness, which is an insatiable desire to have what belongs to our neighbour accompanied with dissatisfaction and discontentment, that we have it not. This coveting of what belongs to our neighbour, though it should continue concealed in our own breasts, and never be acted out in endeavours to procure its object, is in di- rect violation of the very letter of the tenth command- ment: But it often breaks out into action, W« hav« 348 SERMON LXXXVII. a striking instance of this sin in king Ahab, when be desi- red the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreehte. He set his heart upon it, and he was willing to give the owner its full value. But Naboth refused to part with it. Ahab ought, then to have rested satisfied ; but he did not, he was dis- contented and must have his neighbour's property at all events ; therefore he wrested it from him by force, and murdered the owner. To such lengths does this covetous temper sometimes lead. We may lawfully desire to have our neighbours property at a fair price, if he is wilhng to dispose of it. In thisthere is nothing improper. But if he is not willing to dispose of it, we ought to give it up and cease to desire it. Coveting what belongs to another is repeatedly forbidden in other passages of Scripture be- sides the tenth commandment. The Psalmist said, "The covetous, whom the Lord abhorreth ;" Ps. x. 3. I'he pro- phet Micah pronounced a woe against those, who " covet fields, and take them away by violence, and houses, and take them away ;" Mic. ii. 2. The prophet Habakkuk also cried " Woe to him that coveteth an evil covetousness to his house;" Hab. ii. 9. Our Saviour warned his disciples, " Take heed and beware of covetousness ;" Luk xii. 15. And the apostle Paul declared, " This ye know, that no covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God ;" Eph. V. 5. And he exhorted," Let your conversation be without covetous- ness ;" Heb. xiii. 5. Thus I have endeavoured to illustrate the duties re- quired, and the sins forbidden in the tenth command- ment. From what has been said, let us learn, in whatsoever state we are therewith to be content ; and while we are, in a lawful way, endeavouring to better our condition, still, if Providence sees fit not to crown our labours with success, let us be content with his allotments and resign- ed to his will. Let us learn to exercise a charitable frame ot spirit towards our neighbour, and to desire and seek his good, rejoice in his welfare, and sympathize in his af- flictions. Let us guard against all discontentment and freliulness, and impatience, and murmuring, and repining. And if any of us are now under the influence of such a temper, let us cease from indulging it. And let us lay aside and guard against all envy, and all coveting of any thing which belongs to our neighbour. TENTH COMMANDMENT. 319 From this commandment let us learn also that the law of God is spiritual. It is true that all the commandments require a spiritual or heart obedience ; but this does not so clearly appear from the letter of the other command- ments, as from this. The others in their letter, look at exter- nal actions ; but this looks directly at the heart, — "■ Thou shalt not covet ;" for this is an exercise of the heart. It was this commandment particularly that fastened convic- tion of his exceeding sinfulness on the mind of Paul ; '* For, (said he) I had not known lust, except the law had said, thou shalt not covet." And, " when the command- ment, (this same commandment) came, sin revived and I died ;'' Rom. vii. 7, 9. Brethren let an attention to this same commandment produce a similar effect upon us. The law is spiritual, it reaches the inmost thoughts and desires ; and it forbids the first motions of the mind to- wards sinful actions. And must we not on a review of our lives acknowledge that we have in the thoughts, de- sires, and motions of our minds, broken llie law innumera- ble times ? Undoubtedly we must. Consider then again, that it is written, '" Cursed is every one that continueth not in all'things which are written in the book of the law to do them;" Gal. iii. 10. We have therefore incurred this curse innumerable times ; and this curse is eternal death. Let us hence learn our absolute need of a Sa- viour, and of salvation by him. And let the law to which we have for some time been attending, and the lectures on which, we have now brought to a close, be our school- master, to bring us to Christ that we may be justified by faith. By the law, brethren we are cursed, and condemn- ed to eternal death. Our "only hope of salvation is in the l^ord Jesus Christ, the great law-fulfiller, who endured the curse of the law by being made a curse for us, and thus opened a way of redemption for us. Let us there- fore with the apostle Paul, make it our grand concern to *'be found in him, not havijigour own righteousness, Avhich is of the law, but that whicli is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God l3y taith ;" Phil, iii, 9. And being delivered from the law as a covenant of life, through union to Christ by faith, let us take it as the rule of our life, and regulate our conduct according to its holy precepts ; (or " faitli without works is dead ;" Jam. ii. 26. That faith which unites to Christ, and is connected with 350 SEKMON LXXXVill. justification, is a living faith, productive of holiness, or obedience to God's holj law. And in vain do any hope for deliverance from the curse of the law on account of what Christ has done, while thej are the servants of sin, and are not careful to depart from all iniquity, and to keep God's holy commandments. May the Lord write his laws upon our hearts, and give us grace to keep them. — Amen. ECnj^ SERMON LXXXVIII. PERFECTION. 1 JOHN I. a If we say that ive have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in W6\" ' We have in a series of discourses attended to the moral law, as summarily comprehended in the ten command- ments. To this law the great lawgiver requires perfect obedience, and we are in duty bound to render it. But no mere man since the fall has in this life rendered this obe- dience, or can do it. This is taught in our text. " If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us."' In these words the Apostle teaches, that no man, what- ever his attainments may be, can with truth say, that he now has no sin ; that if any should thus say, they would deceive themselves ; and tliat such an assertion, would be a convincing proof that a person continued a stranger to his own heart, and that the truth was not in him, or that he had never experienced the saving grace of God. The doctrine of the text is that there is no sinless per- fection among mankind in this world. This doctrine is stated in our catechism in the answer to the 82nd question as follows : Is any man able perfectly to keep the commandments of God f PERFECTION. 351 JYo mere man since the fall, is able, in this life, perfectly to keep the commandments of God ; but doth daily break theni^ in thought, luord and (/ecc/." The object of the ensuing discourse is to illustrate, prove, and defend this doctrine. I. Let us attend to an illustration of the doctrine. When it is said that no man is perfect, the expression is intended to apply, not only to the unregenerate, but also to the regenerate ; or to the child of God, whose sins are pardoned, as well as to the sinner, who is yet in the gall of bitterness and the bond of iniquity ; and not only to the true christian who has lately become such, and who is yet but a babe in Christ, but also to the established be- liever, who has been long walking in the narrow way, and who has attained to the highest degree of perfection at- tainable in the present life. And here I would remark that this imperfection is to be understood of fallen man. " No man since the fall is able." Our first parents before ^^ j fall were capable of rendering a perfecf obedience ; for God made them up- right, or perfectly holy, and without any inclination to sin in their nature. And they did perfectly keep the law, until by their fall, they lost the image of God and the moral power of doing good. Again the universal imperfection of fallen man is to be restricted to the present life. " No man since the fall is able in this life.'''' After this life the saints will be able, through the grace of God, perfectly to keep all his com- mandments : for saints in heaven are called, " the spirits of just men made perfect;" Heb. xii. 23. We may remark again, that when it is said, "■ No man since the tail is able in this life perfectly to keep -he com- mandments of God," — we must understand Christ to be excepted. Hence it is said, " No mere man." Christ though really and truly a man, was not a mere man, or only man» He was God as well as man. He perfectly kept the commandments. He " did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth ;" 1 Pet. ii. 22. He was " holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners ;" Heb. vii. 26. But with the exception of Christ, it is universally true, that no man, whether unregenerate or regenerate, since the fall, hath kept, or is able, either by his own natural powers, or by any grace received, perfectly to keep the 352 SERMON LXXXVIII. commandments of God ; but doth daily break them in thought, word, and deed. II. We proceed ioprove, this doctrine. 1. Its truth may be argued from what the Scriptures teach concerning the two contrary principles of sin and grace, continually at war with each other in the believer. As in Gal. v. 17 ; " The flesh lusteth against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh ; and these are contrary the one to the other ; so that ye cannot do the things that ye would. And more fully in the epistle to the Romans, chap. vii. ; " I am carnal, sold under sin. For that which I do I allow not : for what I would, that do I not ; but w hat I hate, that do I. It is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. For I know, that in me (that is in my flesh) dwelleth no good thing ; for to will is present with me, but how to perform that which is good, I find not. For the good that I would I do not : but the evil which I would not, that I do. Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. I find then a law, that when I would do good, evil is pres- ent with me. For I delight in the law of God, after the inward man. But I see another law in my members, v/arring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin, which is in my members. O wretched man that I am ! Who shall deliver me from the body of this death ? So then, with tlie mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.*' This epistle was written near thirty years after the con- version of Paul, and but a few years before his death ; and he still found within him remains of sin which occa- sioned a continual warfare with the principle of grace im- planted by the Spirit of God. Paul, thirty years after his conversion, knew nothing of sinless perfection. This is at least a presumptive argument, that it is not attainable by christians in the present life. For surely if perfection is attainable here, we would suppose that Paul would have attained to it, by the time that he wrote this epistle. The great objection to the argument drawn from the experience of Paul in the passage just quoted, is, that the Apostle here spake of an unregenerate person, or ofhim- selt in an unregenerate state, while under conviction of sin. In answer to this we may observe that Paul, in this passage, used the iirst pei'son /. and therefore plainly ^ PERFECT lOlV. 353 spake of himself! " / am carnal. When / would do good, evil is present with me, &c. And he spake in the present tense, of his state as it then was when he wrote this epis- tle. Not li^'o^, but I «m carnal. That which I do \ al- low not, not that w hich I did I alloived not. In my flesh divelleth, not dwelt no good thing ; and so through the whole passage. Language could not more plainly teach tliat Paul, in this discourse, meant himself, and described his exercises as they then were when he wrote this, and when he evidently was, and long had been a christian. Besides in this passage he spake several things of himself wliich could belong to no one but a regenerate person. He spake of a principle within him opposed to sin, and leading him sincerely to will to do good ; and he spake of himself as consenting to the law that it was good, as de- lighting in the law of God after the inward man, and as with his mind serving the law of God. From these considera- tions, we conclude that the Apostle in the passage quoted, spake of himself as a christian ; and of his habitual ex- ercises at the time he wrote this epistle, near 30 years after his conversion. Therefore the objection is not val- id, and the argument from this passage against sinless perfection remains good. ? 2. We may further argue the truth of our doctrine from the Lord's prayer. This prayer, or the senti- ments contained in it we ought daily, as long as we live, tooflferup. Now, one of the petitions which in this prayer we are directed daily to oflfer up, is for the forgiveness of sins ; "forgive us our debts, or trespasses." But if we were free of all sin, and perfect in holiness, there would be no propriety in continuing to offer up this petition, or to pray for the pardon of sin. But since we are daily to pray for the pardon of our sins, it is a clear evidence that we daily need pardon, and therefore daily break the law of God. 3. The same is clearly proved by the express declara- tions of Scripture ; as in the following texts. "There is no man that sinneth not ;" 1 Kings viii. 46. " Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? Not one." Job xiv. 4. " What is man that he should be clean ? And he which is born of a woman that he should be righteous .f^" Job XV. 14. "Who can say, I have made my heart clean, I am pure from my sin.'^" Prov. xx. 9. "There is not a VOL. II. 4r> 354 ' SERMON LXXXVIII, fust man upon earth that doeth good and sinneth not ;'' Eccl. vii. 20. " In many things we offend all ;" Jam. iii. 2. And m our text the proof is most decisive ; "If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us." These texts teach us as plainly as language can express, that there is no such thing as sinless perfec- tion in the present life. 4. Further this doctrine is confirmed by the testimony of the most eminent saints, whose histories are recorded in the Scriptures. Job, David, Isaiah, Daniel, Paul, James, and John, all spake of their own imperfections. And they not only spake of themselves, but united with them, in general terms, all others. And with the experi- ence of the saints of old, I believe the experience of the saints in every age has agreed ; and that the more they have grown in knowledge, and grace, the more they have been convinced of their own sinfulness ; and instead of being disposed to boast of their perfection in holiness^ have been humbled under a sense of their daily sins. Let any one consider the law of God in its great extent, and as reaching in all its particulars to the thoughts, de- sires, intentions, and other exercises of the soul ; and let him compare himself at any time with it, and I believe if he understands the law. and knows himself, and is candid, he will acknowledge that he comes far short of perfect conformity to the law. From the foregoing arguments we confidently con- clude, that the doctrine is true, that " No mere man, since the fall, is able, in this life, perfectly to keep the com- mandments of God; but doth daily break them, in thought, word, and deed." ni. We shall now endeavour to defend the doctrine from some objections, which are brought against it. 1. It is objected that some of the saints of old are said in Scripture to have been perfect men. Thus of Noah it is recorded, " Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations ;" Gen. vi. 9. Of Job we read, "That man was perfect and upright, and one that feared God and eschewed evil;" Job i. 1. Heze- kiah, in his sickness prayed unto the Lord, "Remem- ber now how I have walked before thee in truth, and with a perfect heart ;" 2 Kings xx. 3. And of Zach- ftrias and Elizabeth, it is recorded, " Thev were both PERFECTION. 355 righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless ;" Luk. i. 6. On these passages I would observe ihoX perfect as applied to these persons, is to be understood as signifying something short of an entire freedom from sin, and a complete con- formity to the law of God. For the testimony of the word of God respecting these persons, and the testimony of some of them themselves prove \h?iihy perfect here, is not meant a sinless perfection. Besides, the testimony of the word of God against sinless perfection of any of God'B people in this life, being express and ample, if these texts which speak of the perfection of some persons, can, con- sistently with the use of the word, in the sacred volume, be explained in any other sense, the harmony of the Scriptures requires us thus to explain them. But it is cer- tain that the word perfect does not always in Scripture signify without sin. Of this we have a plain proof, Phil, iii. 12, 15. "Not as though I had already attained, either were already per/ec^ Let us therefore, as many as be perfect^ be thus minded." In these two verses it cannot be that the word perfect means th€ same thing ; for then the Apostle would have contradicted himself, most palpably, in the same breath. In the former verse where the Apos- tle declared \\\xi\?,(i\i not perfect^ a sinless perfection is evi- dently meant. In the latter verse therefore, where he spake of himself with other saints SiS perfect^ it must be un- derstood of something short of a sinless perfection. The word may mean sincere as opposed to hypocritical ; or it may be taken in a comparative sense to denote a greater degree of sanctification ; as the Apostle spake of babes and children in Christ, and also of those who had arrived at the stature of perfect men in Christ to denote their greater advances in holiness. In one of these senses, or in some sense short of sinless obedience, may we under- stand the word perfect as applied to the persons above- mentioned ; and we are authorized thus to understand it by the use of the w ord in other parts of Scripture ; and the harmony of the Scriptures absolutely requires that we should thus understand it. 2. Another objection to the doctrine we are defending, is drawn from those texts of Scripture in which we are exhorted to perfection ; such as the following ; " Walk before me and be thou perfect;" Gen. xvii, 1. "Be ye 356 SERMON LXXXVIII. therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect ;" Mat. v. 48. '•• Perfecting hohness in the fear of God ;" 2 Cor. vii. 1. In answer to this objection, we may observe, that the word in these and similar texts may be used in the same sense, in which we have shown it is sometimes used in Scripture, as signifying something short of sinless obedience. But if we are here to take the word in its most proper and highest sense, which is prob- ably the case, still these texts do not prove, that any do perfectly obey these exhortations, and perfectly keep the commandments of God. For God has a right to com- mand us to be perfect, and it is our duty thus to be, though through the depravity of our hearts, we are morally una- ble to do our duty. Thus notwithstanding the natural enmity of men to God, it is their duty as much as it ever was, to love the Lord their God with all their heart and soul and strength and mind, and their neighbour as them- selves, and God still commands them to do it. "3. Another objection to our doctrine may be drawn from l^John iii. 6, 8, 9 ; "Whosoever abideth in him sin- neth not : whosoever sinneth hath not seen him nei- ther known him. He that commilteth sin is of the de- vil. Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin ; for his seed remaineth in him : and he cannot sin be- cause he is born of God." This text if it proves any thing in favour of the objector, proves too much ; for if strictly taken it will prove, not merely that some of the regenerate have arrived at sinless periection, but that they all, without a single exception, live without sin ; for it equally applies to them all, " Whosoever,'^^ without any exception, '' is born of God doth not commit sin." But the objector himself will not allow this, and therefore a sinless perfection cannot he meant in this text. And that it is not meant is evident from the declaration of the same Apostle in our text, " if wc say that we have no sin we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us." The Apostle can therefore, in the passage from which the ob- jection is drawn mean nothing more, than that a regener- ate person does not live in the commission of any allowed sin. The principle of grace implanted in his heart in re- generation, abiding within him, renders it impossible that he should allow himself in a course of known sin, and con- tinue therein, PERFECTION'. 357 paving thus established and defended this doctrine, I would now draw some interences from it. 1. We learn from this subject that we cannot be saved by our own works. The law ofGod requires perfect o- bedience, continually, in thought, word, and deed ; and it denounces,'' cursed is every one that coutinueth not itl all things, which are written in the book of the law to do them ;" Gal. iii. 10. We have not fully oheyed the law , but on the contrary, times and ways innumerable, have come short and transgressed. Yea we daily transgress in thought, word, and deed. By the law therefore we are condemned and must continue so to be ; and are dail) be- <'.oming more and more guilty, since we are daily adding new transgressions. How deplorable therefore is our state, considered in ourselves, and as under the law ! If one transgression incurs the curse, what must be our guilt ! For we have sinned, not merely once, but daily, hourly, and continually. Let us brethren, compare our- selves with the law, and be convinced of sin ; " For by the law is the knowledge of sin ;" Rom. iii. 20. Let us also be deeply sensible of our inability to keep the law, or by our own obedience to escape the merited wrath of God ; and therefore our ruined and helpless condition. Hence we infer, 2. Tiie absolute necessity of a Saviour, and of an inter- est in him in order to salvation. The law must be main- tained. And therefore man must perish unless one who has obeyed or engages to obey the law, and by sufforing its penalty, has made or engages to make an adequate atonement for sin, becomes his surety. Such a surety is the Lord Jesus Christ, and he alone. He perfectly obey- ed the liw; and he by his suiTeriiigs and death, endured its penalty and thus made a sufficient atonement for sin. And he has righteousness sufiicient for the justification of all who will believe in him. While therefore, you are by the law convinced of sin and guilt, and your ruined and helpless condition ; let this view of your state convince you of your need of a Saviour, make you thankful for such a remedy, and lead you to flee to Clirist and by failli to receive him as the Lord your righteousness, that through his imputed righteousness you may receive the pardon of your sins and be delivered from the curse of the law, which you have incurred by your sins. 358 SERMON LXXXVIU- 3. Though perfection, through the depravity of our na- ture is not attainable in the present hfe, it is nevertheless our duty, and christians ought to desire it, and to rest sat- isfied with nothing short of it. Although we cannot ob tain life by the law, it is nevertheless a rule of life ; and it is our duty to endeavour to conform our lives to it. And he who is truly delivered from the curse of the law, through union to Christ by faith, will endeavour to keep the law, will desire perfect conformity, and will grieve that he comes short of perfect obedience thereunto. He will consent to the law that it is holy, just and good, and that therefore obedience is his duty ; he will look to Christ for strength to enable him to obey it ; under a sense of his failings and transgressions, he will be ready often to cry out with Paul, " O wretched man that I am, who shall deliver me from the body of this death," Rom. vii. 24 ; and he will never be fully satisfied with his attainments in holiness, until he awakes perfectly in the likeness of his Redeemer; and when his holiest works are done, sensible of his fiiilingsand his transgressions and that he has meri- ted nothing ; but on the -contrary deserves the wrath of God for the imperfections of his best works, he will place his reliance for salvation, not on his own works, but en- tirely on the imputed righteousness of his Redeemer. May we all be convinced by the law, of our wretched condition as sinners, and by it be driven to Christ for jus- titication ; and as an evidence of our interest in him, love the lav/ of God, take it as the rule of our lives, endeav- our to conform ourselves thereunto, and be humbled that we fall so far short of that perfect obedience which is our duty. — Amen. ^ SERMON LXXXli. AGGRAVATIONS OF SIXS. MATTHEW XI. 23, 24. " And thou Capernaum^ which art exalted wito heaven^ shalt be brought down to hrM : for if the mighty ivorks which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodoin, it would have re- mained until this day. But I say unto you<, that it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment^ than for thee. Capernaum was a principal city of Galilee. This city had been in a distinguished manner favoured with spirit- ual privileges. Here Christ much resided; and here he had taught much, and performed many miracles. This city, therefore, was exalted to heaven : that is, it was highly distinguished for spiritual privileges. But, notwithstanding; their superior privileges, the inhabitants of this city, gen- erally, continued careless, impenitent and unbelieving. Therefore, the Saviour declared that their punishmenl should be greater in proportion to the privileges which they enjoyed. '• And thou Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell ;" that is to a deeper and more intolerable hell, in proportion to the height to which they were raised, by lljeir privileges ; as the higher any body is raised, if it fell, the heavier and the deeper will its fall be. The reason whicli he gave why he pronounced this heavy judgment upon Capernaum was," For if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it wovdd have remained until this day." Wicked as were the inhabitants of Soil- om ; yet they were not so wicked as the people of Ca- pernaum. For they had not resisted so much liglit, nor abused such distinguished privileges; neither were their liearts so hard ; for if Christ had appeared among them, j'reached to them, and wrought miracles in the midst 360 SERMON LXXXIX. of them, as he had done in Capernainn, they would have repented of their sins, and thus escaped the judgments of God, and have continued until that day. — Therefore, our Saviour added ; " But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom, in the day of judgment than for thee." Our text clearly teaches us that some sins are more ag- ij^ravated than others. The doctrine of the aggravations of sins, we have con- tained in the answer to the 83d question of our Cate- chism. " Are all transgressions of the laiv equally heinous ? Some sins in themselves., and by reason of several aggrava- tions., are more heinous in the sight of God than others.'''' The object of the ensuing discourse is to illustrate the doctrine contained in this answer. It is true that every sin, even the least, deserves the wrath and curse of God forever, and therefore an infinite punishment. This may appear at first view to be an ob- jection against the doctrine, that some sins are more ag- gravated, and deserve a greater punishment than others. This difficulty is obviated by the consideration, that pun- ishments may be equal in duration, and yet not in de- gree. Punishments may be without end, and thus be in- finite in duration, and in this respect equal ; but at the same time, one sinner may suffer in the same period much more than another : and thus, though both sufTer an infi- nite punishment, one may suffer more than the other. — Hence, we conclude, that though every sin deserves an infinite punishment, there may be degrees in punishment, and consequently in guilt ; and that the infinite heinous- ness of all sin, forms no objection against the doctrine that some sins are more aggravated, and deserve, and unless repented of, will receive a greater punishment than oth- ers. This doctrine is most clearly taught a great many times in the Scriptures. We proceed to illustrate the doctrine. " Some sins in themselves, are more heinous in the sight of God than others." These sins against the first table of the law, are more heinous than corresponding sins against the second table. Sins committed against God, are more heinous, than the same sins committed more immediateh \9gainst man. As for instan^:^, it !.s a sjreater sin in itself, to AGGRAVATIONS OP SINS. 361 speak evil against God, than to speak evil against our fellow men. It is a greater sin to rebel against God, or to disobey his commands, than to rebel against human au- thority, or be disobedient to the commands of men. This is proved hy the two following texts of Scripture, " If one man sin against another, the judge shall judge him: hut if a man sin against the Lord, who shall intreat for him :" 1 Sam. ii. 25. And, " against thee, thee only have I sin- ned, and done this evil in thy sight ;" Ps. li. 4. The last verse was spoken by David. In the sin to which he allu- ded, he had grievously sinned against man ; but the sin against God was so much greater, that he seemed in view of it almost to lose sight of the sin committed against man. This is a truth which is very much overlooked ; but which ought to be attended to. Many would esteem it very wrong, to do certain kind of actions towards men, when at the same time, they can commit the same kind of ac- tions towards God, without remorse. But sins commit- ted against God, are in themselves worse than the same ^ins committed against man. Further, while showing that some sins in themselves are more heinous than others, I would observe, that some sins of the second table, are in themselves more heinous than some of the first. As for instance, murder is a great- er sin than sabbath-breaking. Again, there are some sins of the second table, which are in themselves more heinous thanother sins of the same table. Thus murder is more heinous than mere anger, or theft, or lying. We proceed now to consider the aggravations of sins. " Some sins by reason of several aggravations are more heinous in the sight of God than others." In treating of the aggravations of sins, I shall take as my guide that ex- cellent answer in the Larger Catechism, to the ques- tion, " What are those aggravations that make some sins more heinous than others." The general heads of the answer to this question are the following ; " Sins receive their aggravations — 1. From the persons ottcnding, 2. From the parties otTended, ."i From the nature and quality of the ofience, and VOL. IT. 46 362 SERMON LXXXIX. 4. From circumstances of time and place." I. " Sins receive their aggravations from the persons of* fending. If they be of riper age, greater experience, or grace, eminent for profession, gifts, place, office, guides to others, and whose example is likely to be followed by others." It is an aggravation of sin, if it be committed by per- sons of riper age. For we are told, " with the ancient is wisdom ; and in length of days, understanding ;" Job. xii. 12. " Days should speak, and multitude of years should teach wisdom ;" Job. xxxii. 7. It is natural that matured age should have more knowledge, a riper judgment, more prudence, and more stability than youth. And there- fore many things which we would be ready to overlook in youth, we would consider very blameable in riper years. As said Paul, " When I was a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child ; but when I became a man, I put away childish things;" 1 Cor. xiii. 11. It is an aggravation of sin if it be committed by per- sons of experience, who have seen much of the world, and have observed or felt the sad consequences of evil cour- ses. Sin in such, other things being equal, is worse, than in the inexperienced. For " that servant which knew his lord's will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes. But he that knew not and did commit things worthy of stripes shall be beaten with few stripes ;" Luk. xii. 47. 48. And our own feelings testify that sin in such a character is worse than in one of less experience. And especially is it an aggravation of sin, if the person has experienced the grace of God. This forms such a pow- erful check to sin, which the unregenerate have not; and sin in such is the violation of so much greater obligations, ari- sing from the distinguishing goodness and mercy of God, and of such solemn vows and engagements; and it casts such a stumbling-block in the way of others, that in a gra- cious person it must be more aggravated than in others. And thus our own consciences, when we hearken to their voice teach us ; and thus the feelings of mankind generally teach us ; for the world generally feel that sin in a chris- tian, and especially in one who has given evidence by his life that he is possessed of true religion, is worse than in one who has never professed nor manifested that he has \. AiSGRAVATIONS OE SINS. 363 experienced the rich grace of God. And sin becomes, aggravated in proportion as a person is eminent for pro- fession. This we are taught in what Nathan said to Da- vid, " by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme;" 2 Sam. xii. 14. David had been eminent and forward in his profession, and by how much the more eminent he w^as in this respect, by so much the deeper was the wound inflicted on rehg- ion. He had experienced much, and had often spoken of his experiences, and he had instructed and reproved oth- ers ; and therefore his sin was the greater, as he had stronger restraints to break through, and as it did the more injury. And so it is still, other things being equal, (w hich I wish understood in every case) sin in professors of religion is more aggravated than in non-professors; and the more eminent a person is in profession, the worse is sin in him. Again, it is an aggravation of sin if the person commit- ting it, be possessed of great gifts. Thus we read, " to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin;" Jam. iv. 17. That is, in an eminent degree. And that servant which knew his Lord's will and prepared not himself, neither did according to his will, shall be'beaten with many stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, ofhim shall be much required;" Luk. xii. 47. 48. And this is agreeable to the common sense of mankind, as ap- p(»ars from what our Saviour immediately added," To whom men have committed much, ofhim they will ask the more." If a person has great natural talents, to acquire a knowl- edge of his duty, and fitting, him for eminent usefulness in the world, more is reasonably expected from him, and he is more criminal for neglecting his duty, or acting contra- ry thereunto than one who has not such gifts. Agai[i, it is an aggravation of .sin, if the person commit- ting it be in an eminent place or station, hold a high of- fice, is a guide to others, and his example is Hkely to be followed by others. 1 he same sin in a ruler is greater than in the subject. Thus David's station w as mentioned by the prophet Nathan, as an aggravation of his sin. "And Nathan said to David, — thus saith the Lord God of Isra- el. Wherefore hast thou despised the commandment of the Lord, to do evil in his sight." 2 Sam. xii. 7, 9. Ma- gistrates are ordained to be a terror to evil-doers. Their 364 SERMON LXXXIX. business is to punish crimes in others. Therefore sin in them, is, in addition to what it is in others, a violation of the duties of their office, as it unfits them to perform these duties aright ; or if they do attempt to perform them, they undo with one hand, what they attempt to do with the oth- er. And as their station gives them great influence in society, their example is the more pernicious. The same is true of parents and masters ; for their chil- dren and servants look up to them for example, and their evil example will be likely to do more injury than if they did not stand in these relations. Besides, by their own sins,. their mouths will be stopped, so that they will scarcely be able to reprove or restrain sin in those under their care. The same remarks may be made with respect to officers in the church. Sin in them is more aggravated than in a private christian. For they are peculiarly a city set on an hill, that cannot be hid. Superior circumspection is expected from them, their example has great influence, and their sins give great oflTence, and are calculated to do great mischief. Especially is sin more aggravated in a minis.ter of the gospel, than in private christians, or than in inferior church officers. For they are especially look- ed up to as examples of holy living ; and their example if if it be wrong, is calculated to do more injury, and to wound the cause of Christ more, than that of any other christian. That sin in a minister is aggravated by the of- fice which he sustains, the apostle Paul taught when he said, ''Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself.^ Thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal ? Thou that makest thy boast of the law,through breaking the law dislionourf^st thou God.'* For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you ;" Rom. ii. 21, &c. II. " Sins receive their aggravations — from the parties of ended. If immediately against God, his attributes and "worsh ip ; against Christ and his grace ; the Holy Spirit, his witness and workings ; against superiors, men of emi- nency, and such as we stand especially related and en- gaged unto ; against any of the saints, particularly weak brethren, the souls of them or any other ; and the com- mon good of all or of many." Some sins are, more than others, immediately against AGGRAVATIONS OF SlNS. 365 Gotl, his being, perfections, and worship. These sins are on tliis account more aggravated than the same kind of sins committed against man. Thus it was mentioned by Peter as a great aggravation of the sin of Ananias, "tl;ou hast not hed unto men but unto God ;" Acts v. 4. The sins of this class are such as strike at the being of a God, or of the trueGod, .as atheism and idolatry; such s ei- ther speculatively or practically deny any of (he p>-' •'♦;c- tions of God, as his power, wisdom, omijiscier.ce, good- ness, mercy, &c. ; and such as profane and cast contempt upon his ordinances, like the deceiver spoken of by MhI- achi, against whom he pronounced a curse, '• Cursed be tlie deceiver, which hath in his flock a male, and voweth and sacriticeth unto the Lord a corrupt thing: for I am a great King saith the Lord of hosts;" Mai. i. 14. And like the Corinthians who were severely blamed and threatened for their disorderly and irreverent approach to the Lord's table. Some sins are more immediately against Christ as a Saviour, and against the grace which he has provided, and which he ofTers to sinners. These sins are on this account aggravated. Such are the sins of denying the divine nature of Christ, and the atonement which he made for sin. The aggravated nature of these sins is taught in the following passage, 2 Pet. ii. 1 ; " There shall be foise teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction." Such also is the sin of despising the Saviour, as said the apostle Paul, "Of how much sorer punishment, suppose yf. shnll he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot ih'' Sop of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, where- with he w^as sanctified an unholy thing ;" Heb. x. 29. Such also is the sin of neglecting the Saviour and his sal- vation ; as said the Saviour, *' If I had not come and spo- ken unto them they had not had sin: but now they have no cloak for their sin ;" John xv. 22. " And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light ;" John iii. 19. And the Apostle said, "If the word spoken by angels was steadfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward, how shall we escape, if we neg- lect so great salvation .'*" Heb. ii. 2, 3. To the same class 3^6 SERMO.N LXXXIX, also belongs the sin of unbelief, as our Saviour taught when he said, " And when he (that is the Holy Spirit) is come he will reprove the world of sin — of sin, because they believe not on me ;" John xvi. 8, 9. Some sins again are more immediately against the Holy Spirit, in the exercise of his office in the work of redemp- tion. Such sins are also very aggravated, from the cir- cumstance of the object against whom they are immedi- ately committed. Such are the sins of resisting, grieving, or quenching the Holy Spirit in his operations, and espe- cially of doing despite unto him. The aggravated nature of such sins, we are taught by the following texts : " Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, he shall be thought worthy who hath done despite unto the spirit of grace?" Heb. x. 29. " All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men : but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men. And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him : but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come;" Mat. xii. 31, 32. Again, sins are aggravated, by being committed against superiors and men of eminency. The law of God re- quires of us to pay respect and deference to age, to emi- nent characters, and to those clothed with office ; and the same sin against such, is worse from the circumstance of the object against whom it is committed, than if it had been committed against an equal or an inferior. Witness God's judgment upon the children of Bethel for their dis- respect of Elisha, who was an eminent prophet of the Lord, and a man in \ ears. " There came forth little children out of the citv, and mocked him and said unto mm, go up thou bald head. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood ; and tare forty and two chil- dren of them ;" 2 Kings ii. 23, 24. It is not probable that the same judo-ment would have fallen on these chil- dren, it they had thus mocked a younger man, and one of inferior character. In proof of the same, the Lord when he reproved Aaron and Miriam for their sedition against Moses, represented the heinousness of their sin, and enforced his reproof by the character of Moses. And the apostle Jude representing the great wickedness AGGRAVATIONS OF SINS. 367 of certain characters spake of them as despismg domin- ion, and speaking evil of dignities; Jud. 8. Again, sins are aggravated by being committed against such as we stand especially related and engaged unto. It would be a great sin to deceive or betray any person ; but it would be a still greater sin to deceive or betray a. familiar friend. It would be a great sin to murder any person ; but it would be still greater, to murder a friend ■who had always been kind to us, and laid us under many and great obligations ; and the sin would be still more aggravated, if this friend was a brother or sister, a parent, child, husband, or wife. That such sins are aggravated we are taught by the following texts ; '' Mine own familiar friend in whom I trusted, which did eat of my bread, hath lifted up his heel against me ;" Ps. xli. 9. "The eye that mocketh at his father, and despiseth to obey his mother, the ravens of the valley shall pick it out and the young eagles shall eat it ;" Prov. xxx. 17. Again, it is an aggravation of sin, if it be committed a- gainst any of the saints ; for they are peculiarly dear to God, they bear his image, and are his children. And he hath said, " He that toucheth you, toucheth the apple of his eye ;" Zech. ii. 8. And more especially is the sin aggravated, if the persons sinned against, be weak breth- ren ; for such are not only dear to God in common with all his people, but they will be more likely than other saints to be discouraged and turned out of the way. Tq this purpose the Apostle spake, "And through thy know- ledge shall thy weak brother perish, for whom Ciirist died. But when ye sin so against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ :" I Cor. viii. 11, 12. Again it is an aggravation of sin, if it be commitfed a- gainst the souls of any. That is, it is worse to injure the soul of any man than his body, or ta sin against his spirit- ual than his temporal welfare. Because his soul is far more valuable than his body, and an injury done to his soul is much greater than ilit had been done to his body. Finally, it is an aggravation of sin, if it be committed against the common good of all, or many; that is, the same sin is worse, when it injures the public at large, or many, than when it injures an individual, or only a few ; because the mischief is much greater. 368 SERMON LXXXIX. * The two remaining heads of aggravations of sins must be postponed to a future opportunity. Be exhorted in the conclusion of this discourse to re- flect on the evil nature of all sin. If any of you have not been guihy of the aggravations, M'hich have been men- tioned, do not therefore draw the conclusion that jour sins are small; for although some sins are greater than others, yet every sin is great in the sight of God, and de- serves his eternal wrath and curse. And if sin without aggravations be such a great evil, and exposes to such a great punishment, what must it be if committed with those aggravations which have been mentioned } Review this discourse, my hearers, and must not most if not all of you acknowledge, that you have sinned with some of those aggravations which have been considered } Yea, have not some of you sinned with all these aggravations } If you should perish at last, how peculiarly dreadful must be your future misery ! The thought is calculated to awaken and alarm. Let it hav^e this effect ; and let it lead you without delay to fly for refuge unto that Saviour, whose blood cleanseth from all sin, however aggravated. And let those who have fled to him, and experienced Ihe efficacy of his peace speaking blood, ever keep in mind, that sin in them is peculiarly aggravated ; and there- fore let them be careful to depart from all iniquity, and to keep consciences void of offence towards God, and to- wards man. — Ame^., SERMON XC. AiGGRAVATIONS OF SIN9;. MATTHEW XI. 23, 24. •' And thou Capernaum^ which art exalted unto heaven^ shalt be brought doivn to hdl : for if the mighty works tvhich have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have re- mained until this day. But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment^ than for thee:' The doctrine deduced from this text in the preceding discourse was, that some sins are more heinous in the sight of God than others. The sources whence sins re- ceive their aggravations were divided into four; viz. I. The persons oifending, If. The parties offended, III. The nature and quality of tlie offence, IV. Circumstances of time and place. The first two of these have already been considered. We now proceed to the consideration of the remaining two. III. Sins receive their aggravations from the nature and guality of the offence. " If it be against the express letter of the law, break many commandments, contain in it many sins ; if not only conceived in the heart, but breaks forth in words and actions, scandalize others, and admit of no reparation; if against means, mercies, judgments, light of nature, conviction of conscience, public or pri- vate admonition, censures of the church, civil punish- ments; and our prayers, purposes, promises, vows, cov- enants, and engagements to God or men ; if done deliber- ately, wilfully, presumptuously, impudently, boastingly, maliciously, frequently, obstinately, with delight, contin- uance, or relapsing after repentance." It is an aggravation of sin if it l)e committed "against the express letter of the law." In proof of this is the foK VOL. n. 47 370 SERMON XC. lowing passage ; "And the Lord was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned from the Lord God of Is- rael, which had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not go after other gods : but he kept not that which the Lord commanded ;" 1 Kings xi. 9, 10. Some sins are much more plainly forbidden than others. Of some sins there may be doubts, whether they are sins or not. And although it is sinful to do an action, while we have doubts of its lawfulness, it is much more sinful to do an action, the sinfulness of which is so plain, from the express letter of the law concerning it that there can be no doubt about it. To act against the express letter of the law, manifests great boldness and presumption which greatly aggravate sin. It is an aggravation of sin, if it " break many command- ments, and contain in it many sins." For in this case the crime is complicated, and a person is chargeable, not only with the guilt of one crime, but of many. As for instance, simple drunkenness is a great sin ; but if a man when in that state, takes the name of God in vain, and abuses his family, the crime becomes worse. Common sense provee this. Again, it is an aggravation of sin, if it is " not only con- ceived in the heart, but breaks forth in words and actions, and scandalize others." Wrong thoughts, desires, inten- tions, and afll'ections are wicked. For it is a precept of the divine law, " Thou shalt not covet," which relates chiefly to the soul. And a woe is denounced against them that devise iniquity, and work evil upon their beds ; Mic. ii. 1. But the sin is much greater, when our wicked desires and intentions are acted out ; because the mis- chief done is much greater. Thus it is wicked to covet our neighbour's goods ; but it is worse to take them. It is very wicked to desire our neighbour's life ; but it is far worse to take it away. While wickedness is conceal- ed in the heart, it injures no one, but the person who en- tertains it. But when it is acted out, the example often has a pernicious influence on others ; and the act may scandalize others, and may seriously injure them. Again, it is an aggravation of sin, if the act be of such a nature, that the mischief done "admits of no reparation." Thus if we injure a man in his property, we may repair the injury by making restitution. But if we take his life. AGGRAVATIONS OF SINS, 371 or if by our example or advice we ruin his soul, we can never repair the injury. So with respect to ourselves, there are some acts which Avould irreparably injure us. They-would blast our reputation, destroy our usefulness, impair our health, or ruin our property as long as we liv- ed. Such sins arc worse, than those which are not at- tended with such irreparably evil consequences to our- selves or others. Again, it is an aggravation ofsin if it be committed " a- gainst means" to prevent it, and lead to a different course of conduct. Our text and context directly apply to this particular. " Wo unto thee, Chorazin ! wo unto thee Betbsaida ! for if the mighty works which were done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. But I say unto you, it shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon, at the dav of judgment than for you. And thou Capernaum, &c." It is an aggravation of sin, if it be committed against " mercies." Thus it was mentioned as a great aggrava- tion of the wicked conduct of Israel, that they sinned a- gainst many mercies. "Do ye thus requite the Lord, O foolish people, and unwise f Deut. xxxii. 6. " Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth : for the Lord hath spo- ken, I have nourished and brought up children, and they have rebelled against me ;" Is. i. 2. Again, it is an aggravation of sin if it be committed a- gainst "judgments." Thus the prophet Jeremiah men- tioned it as an aggravation of the sins of the Jews. "Thou hast stricken them, but they have not grieved ; thou hast consumed them, but they have refused to receive correc- tion ;" Jer. v. 3. It is a further aggravation of sin if it be committed a- gainst "the light of nature." There are some sins which the light of nature, independent of revelation teaches to be wrong. These sins are aggravated from the conside- ration, that they are so clearly wrong, that a person to commit them, must act against the clearest light. It is a further aggravation of sin if it be committed a- gainst "the conviction of conscience." A person must be bold and hardened in wickedness, to act in opposition to the clear convictions of his conscience. That acting a- gainst conscience is an aggravation of sin, is taught in the 372 SERMON xc. following passages : "Who, knowing the judgment ofGod, that they whicli commit such things are worthy of death, do the same;" Rom. i. 32. And "Happy is he that con- demneth not himself in that thing which he alloweth. And he that doubteth is damned if he eat ;" Rom. xiv. 22, 23. Again it is an aggravation of sin, if it be committed a- gainst " public or private admonition." For we read, " He that being often reproved, hardeneth his neck, shall suddenly be destroyed, and that without remedy ;" Prov. xxix. 1. Here let us pause and reflect, whether these aggrava- tions are not chargeable upon us. Have not we sin- ned against means, mercies, judgments, the light of na- ture, conviction of conscience, and public and private ad- monition ? We have enjoyed many means of knowing our duty. We have our duty clearly revealed to us. We en- joy not only the light of nature in common with the Heathen ; and the Scriptures of the Old Testament in common with the Jews ; and the instructions of Christ in common with Chorazin, Bethsaida, and Capernaum ; but we enjoy also the instructions of the inspired Apostles ; and all the additional light, which from that time to the present, has been shed upon the Scriptures, by the ful- filment of prophecy, and by the labours of the pious and learned. We have not those prejudices to oppose tlie reception of the gospel, which the inhabitants of Caper- naum had. For we have been educated in the belief of it. We have the gospel preached to us, in season and out of season. Most of us have been devoted to God in baptism, and have the seal of his covenant upon us, and thus have been brought into connexion with that body, to which " pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the service of God, and the promises ;" Rom. ix. 4. Many of us have been blessed with pious parents, who not only dedicated us to God in baptism ; but also have endeavoured by their pious instructions and example, by their wholesome reproofs and corrections, and by their earnest prayers, to bring us up in the nur- ture and admonition of the Lord. We have been thesub- jects ot innumerable mercies, temporal and spiritual, per- sojihI, domestic, social, civil and religious ; and in infancy, childhood, youth, and riper years. Many of us have also AGGRAVATIONS OF SI\S. 373 been visited with judgments. We have all been instruc- ted by the judgnicnts of God upon others, and in the world around us. To many of us afflictions have been brought home. We have been disappointed in our pur- suits ; our friends have sickened and died ; our own health has been taken away, and we have been brought to tlie brink of the grave, and tlie border of eternity — And some of you have had your consciences avvakened, to reprove you for sin, and to till your souls with alarm, un- der a sense of your condition as sinners. How have we acted under all these means, mercies, judgments, admonitions, and convictions ? Have we con- tinued in sin, and remained impenitent amidst them all .^ Jf so, our guilt is very aggravated. Like Capernnum, we are exalted to heaven ; and in some respects we are pri- vileged above Capernaum. Peculiarly dreadful will be our doom, if we should be lost. Like Capernaum, we shall be cast down to a deeper hell; and it will be far inore tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judg- ment than for us. And this we have reason to fear will be the dreadful end of many in this place. All the means you have enjoyed, all the mercies you have received, all the judgments with which you have been visited, all the public and private adfnonitions which have been given you, and all the convictions of conscience you have had, if you should die impenitent, willrise up in judgment against you, and condemn you, and aggravate your guilt and future misery. We proceed to the consideration of other aggravations of sins. It is an aggravation of sin, if it be committed ngainst the "censures of tlie church and civil pimishments.'' '*• If he neglect to hear the church (said Chiist) let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican ;" Mat. xviii. 17. Both church censures and civil punishments are calcula- ted to restrain men, and to load them to repentance; and it is therefore an aggravation of sin, if committed against these restraints. Again, it is an aggravation of sin, if it be committed a- gain.st " our prayers, purposes, promises, vows, covenants, and engagements to God, or men." There are maiiy vvho pray against sin, and tlien commit it. This is an aggrava- tion, as it is mockiiigGod, contradicting our prayers, and v>74 SERMON xc; breaking tlirough the additional restraints, bj them im- posed. There are many also who make resolutions and promises of amendment, and yet continue in sin in oppo- sition to them. Hereby they break through greater re- straints, and add to their other sins, the sin ol violating re- solutions and promises. That acting in opposition to our prayers, and breaking our resolutions and promises, are aggravations of sins, are proved by the declaration of the prophet Jeremiah to the Jews. They, calling God to witness, promised, if the prophet would pray for them, they would obey the answer the Lord should give con- cerning them. But they brake their promises. There- fore Jeremiah denounced the judgments of God against them. " Now therefore," that is, because ye have bro- ken your promises " know certainly that ye shall die by the sword &:c;" Jer. XLii. 22. ''Have none of you, my hear- ers, been guilty of thus acting in opposition to your pray- ers, and violating your purposes and promises? Especial- ly have not some of you in the hour of sickness and dis- tress formed purposes, and made promises which you have not kept ? If you continue impenitent they will rise up in judgment against you, and aggravate your doom. Are there not also, many present who are under vows to God, and who have entered into covenant, and engage- ments with him ; who have violated their vows, and cov- enant, and engagements ? The sins of such are greatly ag- gravated. For we read, " Better is it th^ thou should- est not vow, than that thou shouldest vow^ and not pay ;" Eccl. V. 5. And forocttino- the covenant of God, and cov- enant-breaking, whether towards God or men, are men- . tioned in Scripture as great sins. They who have offer- ed their children in baptism have made vows unto God, and have entered into covenant and engagements. Have not some of you, my hearers, violated your vows, covenant and engagements in this respect. You vowed and enga- ged to God to bring up your children in his nurture and a(hnonition. Have you done it? And are you doing it? If not, your sin is greatly aggravated by the l)reach of vows, covenant, and engagements, of which you have been guil- ty. Baptismal vows and engagements brethren, will in the great day be seen to be, not an unmeaning form, but a solemn business. Those again who have come to the table of the Lordi AGGRAVATIONS OP SINS. 375 are under VOWS, have entered professedly into covenant with God, and are under most solemn engagements to him. Sin in such is greatly aggravated, by the violation of vows, covenant, and engagements, with wliich it is at- tended. Again, it is an aggravation of sin, if it be done " delibe- rately, wilfully, presumptuously, impudently, boastingly, maliciously, frequently, obstinately, with delight, contin- uance, or relapsing after repentance.'" To sin deliber- ately, that is with Ibrethought and contrivance ; and to sin wilfully, that is with the iidl bent of the will, are cer- tainly great aggravations of sin. Sin under such circum- stances is certainly far worse, than w hen committed from the impulse of the moment, under strong temptation, and before a person has time to reflect. To this purpose the Psalmist spake, Avhen he said of the wicked man, "He deviseth mischiefupon his bed ; he setteth himself in a way that is a^t good ; he abhorreth not evil ;" Ps. xxxvi. 4. Presumption, that is, rushing into sinful actions in a daring manner, when judgment, and conscience, and the word of God are clearly known to oppose, is defying God, and is certainly a very great aggravation of sin. To this purpose is the passage, Num. xv. 30 ; " The soul that doeth aught presumptuously, the same reproacheth the Lord ; and that soul shall be cut off from among his peo- ple." Impudence or committing sin without shame, and boas- ting of it, either, while in the commission or afterwards, are certriinly very aggravating circumstances. Our own feelings prove this ; and also the following passage of Scripture spoken in relation to the degenerate Israelites. " Were they asfiamed when they had committed abomin- ation ? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush ; therefore shall they fall among them that fall;" Jer. vi. 15. Malice, or doing wickedness from hatred to any one, and a desire or design to injure them; or from hatred to God, and a design to injure iiis cause, isanother great ag- gravation of sin. Malice is spoken of in Scripture ; as one of the greatest sins, and therefore those sins wliich are committed through malice must hereby be greatly aggra- vated. 376 SERMON xc. Frequency in sin is also an aggravation. By human laws a man is accounted more guilty for a second or re- peated offence of the same kind, than for the first, and is more severely punished. And it was mentioned by the LoYd as an as-o-ravation of the sins of Israel in the wilder- ness, that they had tempted him ten times ; Num. xiv. 22. Obstinacy also, that is to sin, in opposition to reasons and arguments, with a determination not to be inlluenced by them, is a great aggravation of sin. In proof of this is the following text: "They refused to hearken, and pull- ed away the shoulder, and stopped their ears that they should not hear. Yea, they made their hearts as an ad- amant stone. Therefore came a great wrath from the Lord of hosts;" Zech. vii. 11, 12. To sin with dehght, or to take pleasure in the commis- sion of sin is also another aggravation. This is much worse than to do it through the strength of temptation, while we disapprove of it, and struggle against it. Continuance in sin is also an aggravation. It is much worse to persevere in a course of sin, than to commit it occasionally. Thus Jeremiah speaking of the degener- ate Jews said; "They proceed from evil to evil: and weary themselves to commit iniquity ;" Jer. ix. 3, 5. Again, relapsing after repentance, or committing a sin, after we have felt deep compunction and sorrow on ac- count of a former commis^sion of it, is a great aggrava- tion. This we are taught by several passages of Scrip- ture of a similar import with the following. " If after they have escaped the pollutions of the world, they are again entangled therein, and overcome ; the latter end is w orse with the;n than the beginning ;" 2 Pet. ii. 20. We proceed to the consideration of the ly. Class of aggravations of sin ; viz. : circumstances of time and place. "If on the Lord's day, or other times of divine worship; or immediately before or after these, or other helps to prevent or remedy such miscarriages. If in public, or hi the presence of others, who are thereby likely to be pro- voked or defiled." An action which would be sinful on any day becomes iflore so when committed on the Lord's day ; because in this case it is a complication of wickedness, including, in addition to what would he sin on any other day, the pro- tanation of the Sabbath, AGGRAVATIONS OF SINS, 377 The same may be said of other times set apart for divine Worship, as when the providence of God calls to fasting and mourning for our own sins, and the sins of others. This was charged upon the Israelites as a great sin, by the prophet Isaiah. " In that day did the Lord God of hosts call to weepmg and to mourning ; and behold joy and gladness, eating flesh and drinking wine. Surely this iniquity shall not be purged from you till ye die ;" Is. xxii. 12, 14. Again it is an aggravation of sin, if it be committed immediately before or after divine worship ; or other helps to prevent or remedy such miscarriages. It is ari aggravation of sin to commit it immediately before, as it tends to unfit us to receive benefit from the worship of God ; and it is an aggravation to commit it immediately after, because it must tend eifectually to destroy all the impressions we may have received. Besides we must break through restraints which we have not at other times; and it manifests a greater contempt of God, immedi- ately after having been engaged in his worship, to rush into siti. Once more, sins are aggravated by the circumstance of the place in which they are committed. It is an aggra- vation of sin, if it be committed in a place dedicated to the worship of God. Christ drave the buyers and sellers out of the temple, and charged them with making a house of prayer, a den of thieves. It is also an aggravation of sin, if it be committed in a public place, or in the presence of others, who are thereby likely to be provoked or defiled. For in this case, persons are chargeable, not only with the guilt of the sin which they commit; but they also become partakers with others in those sins to which they are led by their example. In the conclusion of this discourse, let us ask ourselves; are not our sins greatly aggravated ^ Have not all of us sinned with some of the aggravations which have been mentioned ? And are there not some who are guilty of most, if not all these aggravations? The condition of such must be dreadful indeed. If I address any such, let them be alarmed at their situation, repent of their sins, and flee for refuge to the Saviour, whose blood cleanseth from all sin, however aggravated. Let us all be watchful against in- 392 SERMON XCII. Besides we know that the means of grace, and espe- cially the word, are used by the Holy Spirit, as instru- mental in the conversion of sinners. By the word he convinces of sin, and shows the sinner his ruined condi- tion. He makes use of the word as a fire and hammer to break the flinty heart. And by the word, he discovers to the sinner his delusive dreams, and slays his false peace, and hopes and joys. " I through the law, (said Paul) am dead to the law, that I might live unto God ;" Gal. ii. 19. In this verse we have probably the chief, if not the sole use of means to the unregenerate. Under the influenceof the Spirit of God, carrying home truth with power to the soul, they have a natural tendency to teach the sinner that he can do nothing, and that he lies entire- ly at mercy, and is dependent on the sovreign grace of God ; and to bring him down to that death spoken of by the Apostle in the text just quoted, and also in the fol- lowing," when the commandment came sin revived and I died." Rom. vii. 9. When the unconverted are brought to this state, means have had their effect with respect to them. They have prepared the way under the powerful influence of the spirit of God, for this divine agent, to in- fuse spiritual life, and thus fit the soul to live unto God. Thenlhe same means, which before conversion were of use under the powerful influence of (he spirit of God, to slay the sinner, become of use to cherish spiritual life, and to enable him to bring forth holy fruit to the praise and glory of God. The use of means to the unconverted is to pull them down ; but to the people of God, their use is to build them up. But in neither will they have the effect, unless through the special influence of the Holy Spirit. But at the same time, we have no ground to hope, either from the word of God, or his dealings with man- kind, that the Spirit will exercise his powerful influence, citherto convince and convert the the careless, or to comfort and build up the regenerate, without the instru- mentality of means ; and we ought therefore to be in the use of means that they maybe instrumental in the hands of the divine spirit to our saving benefit. lu the application of this subject, r;.e exhorted to a dili- gent use of the means of grace. Like the impotent man at the pool of Bethesda, who. thongh not able of himself to MEANS OF GRACE. 393 get into the waters when troubled by the angel, yet waited until the Saviour came by and made iiim whole, so wait at the pool of divine ordinances, until the Spirit come and bless you. Be found watching at the gates, and waiting at the posts of the doors of Wisdom. Even though you are in a natural state, there is much more hope, that you will be blessed in so doing, than in neglecting an external at- tendance upon the means of grace. The reason of this opinion is, not that hereby you merit the favour of God, or that God has promised to bless you in the external use of means, while in an unconverted state ; but because W3 see that generally they are those, who are diligent in the external use of means, that do receive the divine bles- sing. But while facts prove this ; still, it is a great sin to sit under the means of grace, and not improve them. It is a great sin to live without prayer; and it is also a great sin to pray in a careless manner, insincerely, and from wrong motives, and with an unholy frame of heart. To neglect the Bible, and not peruse it, or to neglect the pub- lic worship of God's house are gr^at sins ; and so also are reading the Scriptures, or hearing the word in a care- less and unprofitable manner. It is a great sin to neglect any of the ordinances of God's appointment ; and it is al- so a great sin to attend upon any of them in an improper manner ; for " the sacrifice of the wicked is an abomina- tion to the Lord ;" Prov. xv. 8. From these observations, the question will naturally arise, what shall the wicked doPIfthe^ neglect the means of grace they sin, and if they use them with their present tempers they sin. What shall they do ? I answer with the word of God, " Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts, and let him return un- to the Lord ;" Is. lv. 7. " Repent and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out;" Acts. iii. 19. "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ ;" Acts xvi. 31. And use the means of grace with that temper with whicli you ought to use them. This is your immediate duty ; and the neces- sity of divine influences to enable you thus to do, by no means releases you from the duty ; for this necessity arises from the sinner's indisposition to do his duty, which instead of excusing him, the stronger it is, the more guilty he is. You are exhorted to use the means of grace, you are also exhorted to use them aright and not to mock the VOL. II. 50 394 SERMON XCIU heart-searching God; and with this exhortation I must leave jou in the hands of a sovereign God. In the apphcation of this subject, the people of God are especially exhorted to a dihgent use of the means of grace. In proportion as you neglect them, you may expect that your souls will languish, but in proportion as you are dili- gent in the right use of them, you may expect to be builded up in holiness and comfort, through faith unto salvation. There are many precious promises to those who use the means of grace aright. In our text we have such a pro- mise, " Blessed is the man that heareth me, watching dai- ly at my gates, waiting at the posts of my doors." In oth- er pl.ices we read ; " If thou criest after knowledge, and liflest up thy voice for understanding: if thou seekest her as silver, and searchest for her as for hid treasures : then shalt thou understand the fear of the Lord ; and find the knowledge of God;" Prov. ii. 3, 4, 5. "Those that be planted in the house of the Lord shall flourish in the courts of our God. they shall still bring forth fruit in old age ; they shall be fat and flourishing ;" Ps. xcii. 13, 14. "I said not unto the seed of Jacob, seek ye me in vain ;" Is. xlv. 19. They that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength ; they shall mount up with wings as eagles, they shall run and not be weary, and they shall walk and not faint;" Is. xl. 31. Be diligent therefore in the right use of the means of grace which God hath ap- pointed, that you may receive the divine blessing, and grow in grace, and increase in spiritual comforts. Be daily in the Use of the means of grace ; for it is wor- thy of observation that this is the exhortationof our text, "Watching daily at my gates, waiting at the posts of my doors." Many seem to think, we have nothing to do with the means of grace, except on the Sabbath. We have reason to fear that such attend to them very little as they ought, even on the Sal bath. Especially there are many who seem to think, we have nothing to do with public worship on any other day. Many prove this, by their con- duct in uniformly absenting themselves, and some have not hesitated to express it. But our text is directly against them, where the man is pronounced blessed, who watches daily at the gates, and waits at the posts of the doors of wisdom. And many other parts of the Bible are against them. Ministers are commanded to " Preach the word, MEANS OF GRACE. 395 be instant in season, out of season;" 2 Tim. iv. 2. And if it is tlieirduty to preach the word out of the stated sea- sons, as well as in thein, it is uaquestionablj the duty of people to wait upon the word thus preached. After the day of Pentecost the disciples of our Lord, " Continued dailif with one accord ifi the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, praising God. And the Lord added to the church daili/ such as should be saved ;" Acts ii. 46, 17. It is true we have other duties to perform besides the immediate vvorship of God. But can we not perform both ? Men of the world can find time for vain Amuse- ments, feasting, and the hke, and yet attend to business, and do not suppose that they encroach upon the time that ought to be devoted to their worldly concerns. But they who redeem from business, to attend the worship of God, on other days besides the Sabbath, half as much time, as is spent by the people of the world in idleness, vain amusements, and dissipation, are oftentim« s censured as inattentive to their duty, in neglecting their worldly concerns. Brethren, the judgment day will set this matter right; and we shall then see whose conduct will receive the ap- probation of their Master. Whether theirs who redeem- ed time from the world, to engage an hour with the people of God in his worship ; or theirs, who while they can find time to devote hours to dissipation, neglect the occasional Avorship of God, and censure those who attend upon it. The secret of the business generally is, not a want of time, but a dislike of the employment. But certainly they who dislike the worship of God on earth, can never with this temper enter heaven, where the worship and service of God will be the continual and delightful employment of its blessed inhabitants. If our hearts were right, and we had a reahzing sense of the importance of spiritual and eternal things, there would be no difficulty on this subject. We would find time, and it would bo our deliglit too, if we had opportunity, to watch daily at the gates, and wait at the posts of the doors of VVisdom ; and our temporal business would not be neglected. May the Lord enable us all diligently, and with n pro- per spirit to wait upon him in his ordinances and bless us ill the use of them. — Amen. SERMON XCIII. READING THE SCRIPTURES. JOHN V. 39. " Search the Scriptures ; for in them ye think ye have eternal life^ and they are they luhich testify of me." The Jews received the Scriptures of the Old Testa- ment as the word of God; and according to them looked for a Saviour to come. But when Jesus, who in every re- spect answered to the description given of the promised Saviour in the Old Testament, came, they refused to re- ceive him as the expected Messiah. In the chapter which contains our text, we find Jesus, in conversation with the Jews, endeavouring to convince them of his divine mis- sion, and that he was indeed the Christ ; and for this pur- pose, he referred them in our text to the Scriptures of the Old Testament, which they professed to believe. — '^ Search the Scriptures : for in them ye think ye have eternal life, and they are they which testify of me." The duty here enjoined is incumbent on us as well as the Jews. lieadi?itr the ivord of God is an important means of gr ;ce.^ That this means may become effectual, we ought to attend to it in a proper manner. 5 he manner in which it should be attended to, we have poiiited out in our Catechism in the answer to the 90th question. '•'IIoiv is the word to be read and heard, that it may be" come effectual unto salvation ? 1 hat the word may become effectual unto salvation^ we must attend thereunto with diligence^ preparation and prayer, receive It with faith and love, lay it up in our hearts, and practise it in our iivcsy I'his answer refers not only to the reading of the word; but also to the hearing of it when preached. In illustra- READING THE SCRIPTURES. 397 «jng it therefore, we shall, in separate discourses, attend to the manner in which the word should be read, preach- ed, and heard. In this discourse we shall attend only to the reading of fhe word, and shall endeavour to show how the word oi' God ought to be read, and then enforce the duty. I. Let us attend to the manner in which the Scriptures should be read. 1. We ought to read them \w'\\h diligence. The Bereans have set us an example in this respect ; and they were commended for it by the Apostle. "These (said he) were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they re- ceived the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the Scriptures t/mTy, whether those things were so ;" Acts xvii. 11. The command to the children of Israel was, " These words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heai't. And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittestiii thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up. And thou fshalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes. And thou shalt write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates ;" Deut. vi. 6 — 9. The Lord commanded Joshua, "This book of the law shall not depart out of thy mouth ; but thou shalt meditate therein day and night, that thou mayest observe to do according to all that is written therein; Josh. i. 8. And David said, describing the good man, " In his law doth he meditate day and night ;" Ps. i. 2. All these texts teach us, that it is our duty to read the word of God diligently. We should make it our daily study. No day should pass, except when necessarily prevented, without reading a portion of it ; and we ought to make reading the Scriptures a part of our morning and evening devotions. In this way our fainihes, should they neglect to read the vScriptures, indi- vidually by themselves, may receive instruction which they otherwise would not obtain. 2. We should read the Scriptures under a realizing sense that they are indeed the loord of God. We arc apt, in a measure, to give credit to what we hear or read, and to estimate its importance from the character of the author. Heading the Scriptures, therefore under a realizing sense, 398 SERMON XCIII. that they are the word of God, will have a tendency to give credit and weight to what we read. Let us realize when we open our Bibles, that we are treading on holy ground, and that the almighty God, who will be our Judge, speaks in what we are reading. Were we to bring ourselves to realize this, when we read the Scriptures, we would he more likely to derive instruction and profit from them. 3. We ought to read the Scriptures, under a realizing sense of our oivn personal and deep concern in them. The Scriptures speak to every individual, and show what the law of God requires of him, and its penalty in case of transgression. They teach us that we are sinners, and inform us of the dreadful consequences of sin. And they tell us that there is salvation provided, and show us the only way of escape from the ruin brought upon us by sin. In the subject matter of the Scriptures, every one is most deeply concerned. The criminal reads the instrument which contains sentence of death against him, with a deep and awful interest ; and he reads his pardon with a deep and joyful interest ; and the heir reads his father's will with a deep and lively interest ; but no individual is as much concerned in these things, as he is in what is con- tained in the Scriptures, and therefore they ought to be read under a realizing sense of the personal and deep con- cern of the reader in tliem. 4. They ought to be read with a sincere desire to projif by them. Some read the Scriptures to find appearances of contradiction to establish their minds in infidelity; and some read them to use them in venting their wit and ridi- cule against religion. Such, instead of profiting by the Scriptures, wrest them to their own destruction ; and may expect to be given up of God to find what they are seeking after, and to be given up to strong delusions to believe a lie, that they may be damned who believe not the truth, but have pleasure in unrighteousness. There are others again who read the Scriptures, merely from the influence of education, or to quiet conscience, as the formalist prays, and attends public worship, but are indiflercnt about any profit from them. They who read them in this way can have but little prospect of advan- tage. To derive advantage from them, we should read thera with a sincere desire to profit. READING THE SCRIPTURES. 399 5. The Scriptures ought to be read with care^ or at- tention. The coipmand of our Saviour in our text is, " Search the Scriptures." The original word is very expressive. It signifies, to search as for a vein of sil- ver. We are not only to read, but to study them, and to seek fully to understand them. We ought carefully to compare different parts, and to attend to the design, connexion, and general scope of passages ; for there are many deep things in the Scriptures, which duly to understand, requires, not merely a superficial reading, but a careful searching. 6. When we read the Scriptures we ought to en- deavour to treasure them up in our memories. David hid the word of the Lord in his heart. Having treasur- ed the word of God up in our memories, we shall have something always at hand to teach us when we go wrong, and to warn us against sin, to direct us in the path of duty when we are halting between two opinions, and to answer a temptation when assaulted with it. We shall also have ready, arguments in prayer, promises to con- sole and support us under trials, and matter to employ our meditations while pursuing our daily business, and in the wakeful hours of the night. Meditation on the Scrip- tures is an important duty, frequently inculcated in the word of God, and which was frequently practised by the Scripture saints. But unless we treasure the Scriptures in our memory, we cannot perform this duty. Indeed if we read, and immediately forget all we read, we read al- most in vain. 7. The Scriptures ought to be read with self-examin- ation 2i\n\. self-apptication. When we find a sin forbidden, we ought to consider the prohibition as addressed to our- selves, and we ought to examine ourselves, whether we live in this sin. When we find a course of conduct point- ed out that is declared to be inconsistent with the chris- tian character, and to exclude from the kingdom of heav- en, we ought to ask ourselves, are we the character, and admit the consequences with respect to ourselves, and be led without delay to forsake such a dangerous course. Again when we read a command of God, we ought to con- sider the command as addressed to us, and examine our- selves whether we are living in obedience to it. And so also when we read of a trait of the christian character, we 400 SERMON xciir. ought to inquire is this our character. In this manner should we read the Scriptures, if we wo«ld profit by them. 8. Once more. We ought to read the Scriptures with prayer. "In every thing (said an apostle) by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known unto God ;" Phil. iv. 6. The blessing of God granting the influences of his Spirit, is necessary to enable us savingly to understand the Scriptures, and receive spiritual profit from them. The same power that opened the understandings of the disciples to understand the Scriptures, must open our understandings, or they will be to us, as to their spirituality and power, a sealed book. But the divine constitution is, "Ask, and it shall be given you ;" Mat. vii. 7. If then we would profit by reading the Scriptures, we ought to feel our dependence on God, and look to him in prayer, to bless to our spiritual benefit what we read. Having thus shown how the Scriptures ought to be read, we proceed, II. To enforce the duty. 1. The first argument I would offer is that the Scriptures are the word of God. "All Scripture is given by inspira- tion of God ;" 2 Tim. iii. 1 6. " Holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost ;" 2 Pet. i. 21. That God has been pleased to give us a revelation of his will, sufficiently indicates that it is our duty to read and be- come acquainted with it, and that we cannot neglect it without guilt. Has the great God, our Creator, Sovereign, and Judge, condescended to give us a revelation of his will, and shall we live without Bibles in our houses, or shall we permit them to lie on our shelves, and not peruse them, or shall we peruse them so seldom, or so carelessly, as not to become acquainted with their contents ? Sure- ly the character of God ought to secure attention to the Bible, wliich contains his revealed will. 2. Another argument is, that God has commanded us to read his word. It is doubtless our duty imphcitly to obey nil God's commands, and it is at our peril if we do not. Now he has commanded us to read and make ourselves acquainted with the Scriptures. Thus he said to the Is- raelites, " These words which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart. And thou shalt teach them dili- gently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them, when READING THE SCRIPTURES. 40 i ihou sittcst in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou Hest down, and when thou risest up. And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand ; and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes. And thou shalt write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates ;" Deut. vi. 6^—9. And in otir text we read, " Search the Scriptures." 3. We argue the duty from th^ example of the saints of old ; for we are exhorted to be " Followers of them, who through faith and patience inherit the promises;" Heb. vi. 12. And they studied and highly prized the Scrip- tures. We hear David in his Psalms expressing himself concerning the word of God as follows : "Thy word have I hid in mine heart. I will meditate in thy precepts. The law of thy mouth is better unto me, than thousands of gold and silver. O how loVe I thy law ! It is my medita- tion all the day. Mine eyes prevent the night watches j that I might meditate in thy word :" Ps. cxix Such are some of the expressions which show the high value, that the man after God's own heart, put upon his word. The Bereans were highly commended by the Apostle for their diligent searching the Scriptures. " These were more noble than those in Tliessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the Scriptures daily whether those things were so; Acts xvii, 11. Of Apollos it was spoken in high commendation, that he was " Mighty in the Scriptures ;" Acts xviii. 24^ And to the praise of Timothy it was spoken "That from a child he had known the Holy Scriptures ;" 2 Tim. iii. 15. Thus v/e have the example of the Scripture saints ta enforce this duty. 4. Another argument to enforce the reading of the' Scriptures is, the advantages which may be derived from at careful attention to them. The Scriptures contain ah important ahd instructive" history of events; and this too for the space of near three thousand years, before we have scarcely any light from prolane history. They show us as much as any other history the natural causes of the prosperity, decline, and destruction of nations. They ccmtain the best political' institutions and maxims. They abound with the purest moral precepts. And they aflbrd us specimens of tine vt'riting unequalled in human compositions. These are voi, n, 51 402 feERMON XCHI. reasons why the Scriptures should be read. Shall we at- tend to other histories, to other systems of civil pohcy, and morality, and to other works of taste, and shall we neglect the Scriptures, which are so well calculated to instruct us in these things ? But these are advantages of far infe- lior importance to some which are to be derived from reading the Scriptures. Reading the Scriptures maybe of spiritual and eternal benefit to our immortal souls. They contain God's law ; they teach us its penalty ; they inform us of our ruined condition as sinners ; and they discover to us the only way of escape from merited wrath. But to be more par- ticular, reading the Scriptures is calculated to be of spir- itual and eternal advantage to every character, to the careless, the enquiring, and the real christian. The reading of the Scriptures may prove of spiritual and eternal advantage to the careless. For here they have their character drawn and their doom pointed out, in language calculated to awaken them from their securi- ty ; and here they are told what they must be to escape from deserved wrath. Reading the Scriptures is one of the means of grace, which the Spirit uses to awaken and convict the sinner, bring him with anxiety to seek salva- tion, and finally convert and bring him into a state of safe- ty. The word of God is called "The sword of the Spir- it ;" Eph. vi. 17. And it is said "The word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart ;" Hob. iv. 12. We also read, "The law of the Lord is perfect converting the soul;" Ps. xix. 7. And, "born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God ;" 1 Pet. i. 23. And "Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth ;" Jam. i. 18. Hence we learn that it is of import- ance to the careless sinner to read the word of God. It may prove to him the sword of the Spirit, and show him his character and danger, and eventually be instrumental in his saving conversion. I dare not say read the word with carelessness and inattention ; this would be giving you a license to sin. But I will say read it. And if ever you are brought to a saving knowledge of the truth, it will be a grief to you, if you are ignorant of a speculative ac- READING THE SCRIPTURES. 403 quaintance with the Scriptures ; ritrtl you will tintl that such a knowledge would be of vast importance to you. The reading of the Scriptures is also of great import- ance to the inquiring, and cannot be too earnestly recom- mended to them. Such feel that they have broken God's law, and have incurred its curse ; and they are anxious- ly inquiring, whether there is any way of escape, and whither, and how they may escape ? Now it is the word of God alone that teaches us that there is a way of escape from the wrath to come. It is the word of God alone that teaches us whither we shall flee, viz. to the Lord Jesus Christ, on whom our help is laid, and who is mighty to save. And it is the word of God alone that points out the way to Christ, and lays down the marks oi our union to him. In short it is the word of God alone that can an- swer the all important inquiry of an awakened souU " What must I do to be saved ?" The inquiring soul therefore ought to be much engaged in searching the Scriptures. These are the fountains of rehgious knowl- edge. All other books on religious subjecis are but the streams. The streams may be polluted ; but the foun- tain is pure. On the instructions of God's word you may rely. And all the instructions you derive from other sources, as from ministers, from God's professing people, and from religious books, ought to be brought to the test of the Scriptures. " 'I'o the law and to the testimony : if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them ;" Is. viii. 20. When you come to your minister for direction, all the direction that he can give you, that will be of service to you, must be draw^n from the word of God. Be exhorted therefore to a dili- gent, careful and prayerful examination of the Scriptures for yourselves. Most prol)ably one principal reason, why some continue so long in darkness, is, an ignorance of the Scriptures ; and also, most probably, one principal rea- son of the false hopes and joys of many is their ignorance of the Scriptures ; they are ignorant of what is the Scrip- tural character of the christian. From all these conside- rations the inquiring may see the great importance to them of searching tlie Scriptures. Again, reading the word of God is of great importance to the real christian. The Bible is the rule by which he is to walk as a subject of the kingdom of Christ. It is the 40 ded especially to honour, and which he doth bless more than any other. This is taught by facts ; and also by the Scriptures, in which we read, " How shall they hear without a preacher ? Faith cometh by hearing and hear- ing by the word of God;" Rom. x. 14, 17. '-It pleased God by the foohshness of preaching to save them that believe ;" 1 Cor. i. 21. The word of God ought not to be preached by every one ; but only by such as are sufficiently gifted, and also duly approved, and called to this ofiice." Reason teach- es that a man ought to be qualified for any work which he undertakes, and therefore especially for the work of the ministry ,which is peculiarly important. And the Scriptures teach that a gospel minister, should be blameless, an able man, and apt to teach. To be duly qualified for this work, piety is an esseii- 408 SERMON XCIV. tial requisite, and one of the first importance. But not every good man, nor even every eminently pious man, is fit to preach the word. A gospel minister ought also to have natural gifts, and a mind stored with such knowledge as will enable him to explain and apply the Scriptures aright. Whether a man possesses the requisite qualifications ought to be determined by others, qualified to judge. To allow a man to determine this matter himself alone, would be to open the door, to introduce to the ministry, the weakest, most self-sufficient, and enthusiastic men. His qualifications ought to be judged of by others; and he ought to be approved, set apart, and ordained to this of- fice, by those who are themselves ministers of the Gospel. Ofthiswehave frequent examples in the New Testa- ment, and thus was Timothy introduced to the sacred of- fice. While some are not qualified for this office, and there- fore ought to be discouraged, and if possible, prevented from entering it, if they seek it ; others who are qualified and approved, are under the most solemn obligations to devote themselves to the Lord in this work. This we are taught, by the most solemn charge given to Timothy in our text. A charge sufficient to arouse young men, of approv- ed piety and talents, to seek to be fitted for this office, and to enter upon it. " I charge thee before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and kingdom, preach the word." We learn from our text ivhat ministers ought to preach, viz. " the word ;" and how they ought to preach. They ought to " be instant in season, out of season, reprove, rebuke, exhort, with all long-suffering and doctrine." And we learn also, ichy they ought thus to preach the word. — '^ I charge thee before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom." My object in the ensuing discourse is, \. To show what ministers ought to preach. If. How they ought to preach. I. I am to show what ministers otight to preach. Our text teaches us they ought to preach the word. " Preach the word ;" that is the word of God as contained in the- PREACHING THE WORD. 409 Scriptures of truth. The object of tfiis word is, to teach men tlie way of salvation tlirough Christ. Christ, and sal- vation through him are the sum and substance of the Scriptures, both of the Old and New Testaments. They all have in some way or other a bearing on this point. — Christ is the Alphaand Omegaof the Bible. Christ and sal- vation through him ought therefore to be the theme of min- isters, in their preaching. Do they preach the deplorable state of man ? It ought to be to show the necessity of a Sa- viour .Do they hold up the terrors of the law, the wrath of God and the torment of the wicked ? The object ought to be to drive them to Christ for safety, who is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth. Do they preach pardon of sin and acceptance with God.^* These ought to be preached through faith in Christ, and as granted to the sinner for his sake. Do they preach morality and holiness of life .-^ These ought to be preach- ed as flowing from a new heart, given to us by the Spirit of Christ in consequence of his death. And so of other sub- jects. Every sermon ought to have a bearing upon Christ and him crucitied, or to grow out of this subject. And sermons which stand disconnected from this subject are not gospel sermons ; and ministers who have nothing of Christ in their sermons violate their commission and can do no good ; but do much harm to their people. Such arc those moral essays, which are sometimes pronounced from the sacred desk, which have nothing more of the gospel of Christ in them, than are to be found in the wri- tings of Cicero or Seneca, or any other of the Heathen mo- ralists. What does the Bible teach on this subject .^^ "Preach the word," the revealed word of God. " Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel ;" Mark xvi. 1.5. And wiiat is the gospel, but the glad tidings of salv^ation through Jesus Christ ? And what was the conduct of Paul and his fellow labourers ? Hear it from his own declarations ; " We preach not ourselves, but Christ Je- sus the Lord ;" 2 Cor. iv. .'>. " Christ sent me to preach the gospel. We preach Christ crucified ;" 1 Cor. i. 17, 23. "■ I determined not to know anything among you, save Jesus Christ and him crucified ;" 1 Cor. ii. 2. From these texts we clearly see what a minister ought to preach. Christ and his cross should I)e ail his theme. VOL. II. .52 410 SERMON XCIV, Christ and his cross, the foundation of a sinners pardon, acceptance, sanctificatiou, holj obedience, perseverance, consolation, and eternal life ; and his condemnation too if he continues a stranger to him. We proceed, II. To show hoiv ministers ought to preach. We have the manner in which the gospel ought to be preached, as taught in the Scriptures, excellently expressed in our Lar- ger Catechism in the answer to the question, " How is the word of God to be preached by those that are called thereunto ? They that are called to labour in the ministry of the •word are to preach sound doctrine; diligently, in season, and out of season ; plainly, not in the enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power ; faithfully, making known the whole counsel of God ; wisely applying themselves to the necessities and capacities of the hearers ; zealously, with fervent love to God, and the souls of his people ; sincerely, aiming at his glory, and their conversion, edification and salvation." In showing the manner in which ministers ought to preach the gospel, I shall take this answer as my guide. 1. Ministers should preach the gospel " diligently^ \n season, and out of season." Slothfulness in any lawful caUing is a crime, and is condemned in the word of God, in which we are exhorted to be, " Not slothful in busi- ness ;" Rom. xii. 11. More especially therefore, must slothfulness be criminal in a gospel minister, as the bu- siness in which he is engaged is more important than any other. Besides, that a minister ought to be diligent in preaching the gospel is proved from the exhortations which Paul gave to Timothy, and from the examples of Christ and his apostles. Paul exhorted Timothy to give himself wholly to the work ; and to be instant, in season, and out of season. Our Saviour was indefatigable in preaching the gospel ; not only on the Sabbath, but also on other days; and not only in the temple and synagogues but in all places, where opportunity offered. Paul's life abundantly shows that he was diligent in preaching the gospel. Of Apollos it is recorded, " He spake and taught diligently the things of the Lord ;" Acts xviii. 25. And the apostles collectively resolved, " We will give our- selves continually to prayer, and to the ministry of the PRE^^iCHING THE WORD. 411 word ;" Acts vi. 4. Hence it is evident that a minister ought to be diligent in preaching the gospel; and that it is his duty to preach, not only in season, or on the Sabbath; but also out of season, or out of the ordinary times, and on other days of the week besides the Sabbath. And a minister ought to delight in being thus diligent in his work; and he ought never to esteem his labour, in the "Work of the ministry, a drudgery, but a pleasure. He ought with delight to be willing to spend and be spent in this important and glorious service. And the man, who has not this spirit, had better be engaged in any other bu- siness, than that of the gospel ministry. 2. Ministers of the gospel ought to preach the word *''' plainly^ not in the enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power." Paul told the Corinthians, " In the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that by my voice, I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an unknovvn tongue :" 1 Cor. xiv. 19. " We use great plainness of speech ;" 2 Cor. iii. 12. " And I, brethren, when I came to you, came not with excellency of speech, or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of God. And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit, and of power ;" 1 Cor. ii. 1, 4. Paul was abundantly competent to address his hearers in a learned and high style, or in the enticing words of man's wisdom ; but he carefully avoided it, and spake witli great plainness, and in such a manner as the Spirit of God usually accompanies with his powerful influences, convincing, converting, and comforting the soul. And it is the duty of ministers now, to address their audiences in the same manner. The object of a minister ought to be, not to gain the admiration of his hearers, for fiis rhetorical flourishes and display of learning; but to do their souls good ; and therefore he ought to speak with great plain- ness. For he must be understood by his hearers to do them any good ; but it is certain, that a large portion of most if not all congregations are unlearned, and cannot understand any other than plain language. Such persons, when the preacher makes a display of learning in his sermons, must remain entirely unprofited, though their souls are valuable, as the souls of those who are learned, 412 SERMON XCIV. This want of plainness of style, so as to be understood by all their hearers, is a great fault, sometimes, in preachers, and argues either a great want of acquaintance with the mass of the peopk^ who compose congregations ; or a criminal desire of gaining applause to themselves, instead of instructing their hearers, and glorifying Christ. Preach- ing in an unknown tongue would be as likely to do good as such preaching. And here I would observe that by plainness is, by no means, meant, a vulgar style of preach- ing ; but such a simplicity, as is perfectly consistent with purity and even elegance of style. These are entirely compatible with each other, as we may learn from the manner in which Christ and his apostles preached. 3. Ministers ought to preach the word '"faithfully ma- king known the whole counsel of God." The Lord give to Ezekiel a solemn charge on this subject ; and through him every minister of the word of God is address- ed, in the same solemn language. "O son of man, I have set thee i watchman unto the house of Israel : therefore thou shalt hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from me. When I say unto the wicked, O wicked man, thou shalt surely die ; if thou dost not speak to warn the "wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his ini- quity ; but his blood will I require at thine hand ;" Ezek. xxxiii. 7, 8. J o Jeremiah the Lord gave charge, "He that bath my word, let him speak my word faithfully;" Jer. xxiii. 28, And that great pattern for a gospel minister, the apostle Paul, said to the Corinthians, " Let a man so ac- count of us, as of the ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God. Moreover it is required in stew- ards that a man be found fiithful ;" 1 Cor. iv. 1, 2. When taking his leave of the Ephesians, after labouring among them for some ♦ime he appealed to tiiem saying; " I kept back nothing that was profitable unto you. I take you to record this day, that I am pure from the blood of all men. For f have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God;" Acts xx. 20, 26,27. xAnd he exhorted Timothy in our text, " Reprove, rebuke." Ministers have immortal souls committed to their care, therefore faithfulness becomes them, lest these souls should perish. If ministers will be faithful, they must pru- dently declare the whole counsel of God. They must not refrain from reproviiig vice or from preaching cer- PREACHING THE WORD. 413 tain truths, because they may be dishked by some per- sons iVom whom they are hkely to receive lempoiui ad- vantage, it" they please them ; and whose opposition m.iy give them trouble if" they displease them. Such conduct is an attempt to please men rather than God. Minisiers have strong temptations to withhold unpalatable truUis ; because the people ofteii desire to have smooth thiiigs prophesied to them, and to be permitted to live in ease, and not have their consciences awakened to disturb them. But wo to that people who has a minister, who will follow their desires, when they wish him to prophesy smooth things to them. Under his preaching, they will most prob- ably continue secure, until they drop into the bottoinless pit. And wo to that minister who is deterred iVoin tkithibl- ness by a desire to please his people. It they should per- ish, their blood will be required at his hand. 4. Ministers ought to preach the word '•^wiseh/, applying themselves to the necessities and capacities of the hear- ers." Paul cxiiorted Timotfiy "Study to show thyselt\ap- proved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be a- shamed, rightly dividing the word of truth;" 2 Tim. ii. 15. And writing to the Corinthians he said, ^ I have fed you with milk and not with meat : for hitherto ye were not a- ble to bear it, neither yet now are ye able ;" 1 Cor. iii. 2. And to the Colossians he wrote "Whom we preach, warn- ing every man and teaching every man in all wisdom;" Col. i. 28. ■ This wisdom consists in selecting in tlie general course of preaching, those subjects whicii are most important, and best calculated to promote the good of a people, and dwelling most frequently on these subjects, and but occa- sionally on others, which, though the truth of God, are of less importance. It consists turther in endeavouring to adapt discourses to times and seasons, and to the state of a congregation in general, and to every class of persons in particular, so as to give to every one his portion in due season. There are particular times and seasons, which may be improved with great advantage; as for instance the beginning of the year; a time ol" great phvity, or of great scarcity ; a time of great sickness and itiorlidity, and the like. A minister who preaches wisely, will lay hold of such seasons and itnj)jove them. Further when any particular vice prevails greatly in a congregation, a wise 414 SERMON XCIV. . minister will frequently call the attention of his congrega- tion to this subject, and endeavour to eflfect a reformation. When professors of religion are backsliding, and becom- ing lukewarm, he ought to dwell much upon the evils of such a state. When a congregation is in general careless, his sermons ought to be such as are best calculated to a- waken the secure. And when there are many inquiring, he ought to dwell on subjects, calculated to lead them to Christ. Thus if he acts wisely, he will adapt his subjects generally, to the general state of his congregation. Be- sides, as there always are different classes and charac- ters in a congregation, some careless, some inquiring, some backsliding, some weak in the faith, some strong, some w^avering, some tempted, some afflicted, and some in other circumstances, it becomes a minister to endeav- our to give to each of these his portion in due season. And hence we may infer, that a minister should be as much as practicable, consistently with other duties, among his people, that he may become acquainted with their state, and know how to adapt his discourses to their respective necessities. 5. Ministers ought to preach the word " zealously^ with fervent love to God, and the souls of his people." Of A- poUos it is recorded, ''being fervent in the spirit, he spake and taught diligently the things of the Lord ;" Acts xviii. 25. And Paul and his fellow labourers were so zealous in this work, that they were charged with being beside themselves ; to which charge Paul replied, '• Whether we be beside ourselves it is to God : or whether we be sober, it is for your cause. For the love of Christ con- straineth us ;" 2 Cor. v. 13, 14. And in the same epistle he wrote, "I will very gladly spend and be spent for you, though the more abundantly I love you, the less I be lov- ed ;" 2 Cor. xii. I.'}. Ministers ought to l)e so filled with love to God and the souls of men, as to engage with their whole hearts in the work of the ministry, and to show to the world that they are indeed in earnest. The subjects on which a minister addresses his people or ought to ad- dress them, are so vastly important, that as one expresses himself '' Passion is reason here." And the man who can go into the pulpit, and speak on the amazing plan of re- demption, and the love of Christ therein manifested, and on the infinitely important concerns of eternity, in a cold. PREACHING THE WORD. 415 and unfeeling manner ; and the man who does not mani- fest, by his diligence, his watching for souls, and his un- >vearied zeal in the work of the ministry ; who does not in short feel, and manifest that he feels willing to spend and be spent in this important and glorious work, is not fit to be a minister of the gospel. 6. Ministers ought to preach the word " shicrrely^ aim- ing at the glory of God, and the conversion, edification, and salvation of their hearers." They ought sincerely to believe the truths which they preach to others, and to have a realizing sense of their importance. " We are not (said Paul to the Corinthians) as many which corrupt the word of God : but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ ;" 2 Cor. ii. 17. We *' have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, not handling the word of God de- ceitfully, but, by manifestation of the truth, commending ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God;" 2 Cor. iv. 2. We have reason to believe there have been those, invested with the office of the sacred ministry, who have really disbelieved the truths which they have preached to others. Surely Tophet is ordained of old for such ministers. We have reason to believe also that some bear the name of ministers, who have no realizing sense of the importance of the truths which they deliver. The state of such ministers must be dreadful beyond de-' scription. The glory of God and the salvation of souls are to be the great ends of a gospel minister ; and these are the ends, which he should earnestly endeavour to pro- mote. To this purpose Paul spake when he said, •' As we were allowed of God to be put in trust with the gospel, even so we speak, not as pleasing men, but God which trieth our hearts. For neither at any time used we llat- tering words, as ye know ; nor a cloak of covetousness, God is witness. Nor of men sought we glory;" 1 Thcs. ii. 4, 5, 6. '• Though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that 1 might gain the more ;" 1 Cor. ix. 19. " We do all things for your edifying ;" 2 Cor. xii. 19. Thus Paul and the primitive ministers preached. Their object was to glorify God, and save the souls of men. And this has been in all ages, and still is, the object of every minister, whom God approves. The esteem of men, a hvclihood, and the advancement 416 SERMON XCIV. of temporal interest, we have reason to fear, sometimes operate as motives to influence men to seek the gospel ministry, and govern them in their preaching and conduct, wlien they have obtained this office; but the faithful min- ister will sincerely and supremely aim at promoting the glory of him who called him; and the conversion, edifica- tion, and salvation of those committed to his charge. A solemn consideration which ought to influence every minister most carefully to preach the word, and nothing but the word of God, and to preach it in the manner di- rected in the Scriptures, we have contained in our text ; "1 charge thee before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and kingdom." Ministers are acting in the presence of God, whose ambassadors they profess to be, and of the divine Saviour who died to purchase the salvation which they are sent forth to proclaim; and a day of judgment is approaching when ' the souls committed to their care must stand before the judgment seat of Christ, and be welcomed to everlasting glory, or be banislied to endless misery, according as they have received or not, the salva- tion of Christ. What a solemn motive to influence minis- ters to be faithful ! The souls to whom they preach must soon stand in judgment, and enter upon an eternal state. How contemptible ought all time-serving, and want of faithfulness, to appear in view of the judgment bar. l[ ministers have any regard to the souls of their people, this motive ought to have a solemn influence to le-cid them to do their duty according to tlie word of God. Besides ministers themselves must soon s,tand in judg- ment, and give an account of their faithfulness. And the Lord has declared, that if any perish through their ne- glect or unfaithfulness, their blood he will require at the watchmen's hands. Awlul declaration ! Sufficient to make those who have entered, or who may be seeking this oflice, to tremble, and shrink back from the work. But if we are called toil, there is a necessity laid upon us to preach the gospel, and wo be to us, if we preach not the gospel. Brethren, pray for you minister, that he may be faithful, and clear his soul from the guilt of your blood.— Amf.x. SERMON XCV. HEARING THE WORD. LUKE VIII. 18. FIRST CLAUSE. *' Take heed therefore how ye hear.''^ Our Saviour had described in the parable of the sower, the different kinds of hearers, whicli are found in reli- gious assemblies, where the word is preached ; and the effects which the word produced upon them. Hence he took occasion to give the exhortation contained in our text: " Take heed therefore how ye hear." We have in former discourses, attended to the manner in which the word of God ought to be read and preached ; we come now in course to consider how it oug-ht to be heard when preached. Our duty in this respect, we have pointed out in the answer to the 90th question of our Catechism. " How is the word to be read and heard that it may become effectual unto salvation ? That the word may become effectual unto salvation^ ive must attend thereunto with diligence^ preparation^ and prayer^ receive it with faith and love, lay it up in our hearts, and practise it in our livesP Our text evidently implies that it is our duty to hear the word or wait upon the preaching of it. And that this is the duty of all who can have access to the word preach- ed, is evident from other passages of Scripture, such as the exhortation, '• Not forsaking the assembling ourselves together, as the manner of some is ;" Heb. j^ 25 ; and the command to ministers to " Preach the gospel to every creature;" Mark xvi. 1.'); which undoubtedly implies the duty of every one to hear it ; and also from the numerous examples, of attendance upon the preaching of the word which we find in Scripture, and the happy effects which result from the word preached. But it is a lamentable truth that many who live where VOL. II. .')3 418 SERMOilH XGV. the word of God is preached, seldom or never hear it. Thej forsake the assembling of themselves together. Most certainly such are exceedingly guilty, and unless they repent and change their conduct, it will be more tol- erable for Sodom and Gomorrah, and Tyre and Sidon, in the day of judgment, than for them. But our business at this time is not so much with these persons, who neglect attendance upon the preaching of the word, as with those who do externally wait upon it. Many such receive no saving benefit. And, even among those, who, we have reason to believe, are the people of God, many, at times, appear to bring forth little or no fruit. Corrupt nature will be ready to frame excuses for this un- profitable hearing of the word ; but the real reason is, that these hearers do not wait upon the word preached in a proper manner. Ihey do not sufficiently take heed how they hear. "^^ If we would profit by the word preached we ought* 1. To attend to it with dUigqnce, This diligence im- plies a frequent hearing of the word preached; or embra- cing ever^y opportunity to hear it that can be done consis- tently with other duties, both in season, and out of season, or statedly and occasionally ; and not suffer trifles, as ma- ny do, to keep us away from the house of God. When we are sitting under the sound of the preached gospel, we ought to give a diligent attention to the word delivered. Thus our Saviour, when he began his sermon concerning the sower, called upon his hearers to " hear- ken,'' or give a diligent attention. And several times he gave the exhortation, " He that hath an ear to hear, let him hear." So also Paul when he was about to address an assembly of people, exhorted them to give a strict at- tention. ''Men of Israel, and ye that fear God give audi- ence ;" Acts xiii. 16. It is for want of a due attention, while waiting on the preaching of the word, that so many receive so little profit from it. Without attention it is im- possible that file v\ ord should profit us. And this attention should be uninterrupted ; for by losing a part we frequently lose the sense of the whole ; and unless we understand what we hear we cannot be profited. To this diligent at- tention to the word while it is preached, stands opposed every thing which has a tendency to divert the attention. Wandering thoughts ought to be carefully guarded a- -■ffl5» HtlARIXG THE WORD. 4l9 gainst ; and our hearts ought to he fixed, and intent upon the word wliich \\c are hearing : Hence 1 would observe thrit late attendance, unnecessarily leaving the house of God, before the conclusion of worship, drowsiness, sleep- ing, smiling, whispering, and tlie like are highly improper ; as the person, who is guilty of any of these actions, cannot give that attention to the word which he ought, and gen- erally he disturbs others and distracts their attention, as well as his own. They who come late into the house of God, must lose all the benefit which might be derived from the exercises at- tended to before they appear. And almost certainly they disturb the devotions, and distract the attention of others ; whicli is a serious consideration. I know that persone may sometimes be necessarily detained until after the ser- vice has commenced. But it is not at all probable that necessity can be plead in behalf of those, who are habitu- ally late in their attendance; nor is it probable that those who feel so little interested in the exercises of the sanc- tuary, as to be willing, unrjecessarily, to lose a part, can have that temper, which will fit tliem to derive profit from the word, when they do come. Neither is it to be ex- pected that those who stand about the doors of the house of worship, conversing on worldly subjects, or who unne- cessarily delay, and are not present to unite in asking a blessing on the exercises of the day, will receive the bles- sing about which they manifest so much indiflference. Brethren, I confidently assert it ; no person who feels as he ought to feel, will be willingly absent, at the com- mencement of the public worship of God's house. Those again who unnecessarily leave the house of God, before the conclusion of the religious exercises, most as- suredly do not hear the word with diligence, and cannot be supposed to have received any profit. Those who unnecessarily go away before the blessing is pronounced, as well as those who come after it is asked, we have every reason to believe, receive no profit. Besides they dis- turb others, and interrupt their attention which is a very serious evil. Again, all whispering, smiling, and light gestures,are in- consistent with a diligent hearing; of the word. Persons who act thus, certainly, cannot have that reverence ibr God and his truth, which is indispensable to a profitable 420 SERMON XCV. hearingof the word preached. Nor can their attention be fixed while they act in such a way. Yea, persons who act thus, not only, receive no good, but greatly provoke God, who *'• Is greatly to he feared in the assembly of the Baitits, and to be had in reverence of all them that are about him ;" Ps. Lxxxix. 7. And who has said " I will be sancti- fied in them that come nigh me, and before all the people I will be glorified ;" Lev. x. 3. Besides the evil extends further. Persons guilty of such conduct, injure others, as well as themselves, by diverting their attention, and distracting their minds, aud thus hindering the good which they might otherwise receive. Another practice, which is inconsistent with a diligent attention to the word preached is, sleeping under the preaching of the word. Such persons certainly cannot be profited. This can need no proof A minister might as well preach to the seats in which they sit, as to them. Besides, they not only receive no benefit themselves ; but they also injure others, by distracting their attention. And if those who indulge in this practice be persons to whom others look up for example, as is sometimes the case, their example, becomes peculiarly pernicious, as it must vilify the ordinance of preaching in the estimation of others, and they probably will take a license from it to do the same. Besides this practice of sleeping under the preaching of the word lias a direct tendency to abate the ardour and zeal of a minister, and to discourage him, both in his preparations, and his delivery ; and it is calculated to injure his feelings as a man, and much more as a minis- ter of Christ ; aqd it is certainly a great indignity ofTered to God. Let those addicted to this practice, be exhorted, to watch and war, and pray against this sin. Let them hearken to our text, "Take heed, therefore how ye hear." If they obey this injunction of him who will shortly be their judge, they will no more sleep under the preaching of his word. 2. If we would take heed how w^e hear, and profit by the word preached we ought to prepare ourselves for at- tending upon it. We ought seasonably to Iny aside world- ly business, and exclude from our minds worldly thoughts. If thouglits of tfie world, its business, riches, honours, or pleasures, occupy our minds, when we go into the house HEARING THi: WOKU 421 of God, wc cannot reasonably expect to derive profit from the word preached. Such thoughts will eillier entirely exclude the word, or else choke it and render it ut)fruitful. And this is one great reason why the word is so often un- fruitful in those who appear in the house of God. They have not endeavoured to banish worldly thoughts from their minds ; but have brought them with them to the place of worship; and while the word is sounding in their ears, their thoughts like the fool's eyes are in the ends of the earth, intent upon their farms, their merchandize, or other means of gain, their sinful pleasures, and theii* schemes of ambition, for the attainment of worldly hon- our. It therefore becomes us to abstract ourselves from the world ; and this is not the work of a moment, but requires time. And here I would observe, that it would be an ex- cellent custom, to have worldly business seasonably out of the way on Saturday evening, that we might begin to prepare for the Sabbath before it arrives. Again, we ought to endeavour, previously to hearing the word, not only to have our minds abstracted from the world, but to have them impressed with a reverential fear of that God into whose presence we are about to go, and ivith a sense of the importanceof profiting under the word ■which we are about to hear. God is a being of infinite majesty, and of spotless purity. He is of purer eyes than to behold iniquity. He searcheth the heart, and trieth the reins.and requireth that those who worship him, should worship him in spirit and truth. He is greatly to be fear- ed in the assembly of his saints, and to be had in rever- ence of all them that are about film. He is fearful in praises and has declared he will be sanctified in all them that come nigh unto him. The word wliich we are about to hear, when we are going to the house of God, is the word of this God, in which we are most deeply interested ; and which will be either a savour of life unto life, or of death unto death. Witli these solemn truths we ought to labour to have our minds Impressed, We ought also to endeavour to have a sense of our necessities, and- of the fulness and excellency of the blessings which God dispen- ses in his house, that we may come feeling our emptiness, and hungering and thirsting after the bread of life, if we were to come with such a pri'paration, we have eveJV 422 SERMON xcv. reason to believe we would not generally go away so barren as we do. 3. We ought to hear the word vi'iih prayer. We ought to look to God for his blessing before we come, while we are hearing, and after we have heard. Paul will plant and Apollos water in vain, until the Lord gives the increase. And the constitution which he has established is, " Ask and it shall be given you — every one that asketh receiv- eth ;" Mat. vii; 7, 8. " I will yet for this be enquired of by the house of Israel to do it for them ;" Ezek. xxxvi. 37. If therefore we would profit by the word preached, it be- comes us to be fervent in prayer for the divine blessing. We ought to go to the house of God after having sought his blessing. And doubtless one great reason why many profit so little, under the preaching of the word is, they do not pray for the divine blessing. As the apostle James said, '' Ye have not, because ye ask not ;" Jam. iv. 2. Or they do not pray aright, as James said again, " Ye ask and receive not, because ye ask amiss ;" Jam. iv. 3. Be- fore you come to the house of God, you ought to implore the divine blessing, on the word and ordinances of God. You ought to pray for your minister, that the Lord would be with him, help him to speak in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, and divide to every one their portion in due season, and especially enable him to speak a word in season and with power to your soul. The apostle Paul exhorted most of the churches to which he wrote, " Brethren pray for me — pray for us." The prayers of faith offered up for the ministers of God, are oftentimes answered by blessings upon the offerer. You ought to pray also for the outpouring of the Spirit of God upon his church, and particularly that part of it, in which your lot is cast. If you have that disposition which you ought to have to profit by the word, you will desire the advance- ment of the kingdom of Christ, and the saving good of others. " Pray (said the Psalmist) for the peace of Jeru- salem they shall prosper that love thee ;" Ps. cxxii. 6. If your petitions be answered, and the Lord build up Zion, you yourselves may expect to receive a share of the blessing. And you ought especially to pray each one for yourself^ that the Lord would grant his blessing, and give you the composed mind, and the hearing ear; and that he would enable you to understand and apply what you hear, and bring forth fruit unto eternal life. HEARING THE WORD. 423 Wliile you are hearing the word it would be profitable, frequently to put up short ejaculations for the divine bles- sing. And after you have heard the word, prayer is still a duty. If you would profit, follow what you have heard, with prayer to God, that he would seal instruction upon your heart, preserve the seed of the word by his Spirit, and make it fruitful. 4. If we would profit under the preaching of the word, we must receive it W\i\\ faith. It was for want of this that the Israelites of whom the Apostle spake did not profit. — " For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them ; but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it ;" Heb. iv. 2. If the word is not believed, in vain is it preached to us. — We ought to believe it to be the word of God, if it be ac- cording to the Scriptures of truth. As the Bereans did, try what you hear by this rule. And when the word of God, according to the Scriptures is preached, hear it with faith, assenting to its truth, and with a realizing sense of its importance as the word of God, and with a determin- ation implicitly to follow the truth of God. 5. Receive the word not only with faith, but also with love. A want of love to the truth was one reason why some concerning whom the Apostle wrote failed of salva- tion. " Triey receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved ;" 2 Thes. ii. 10. Some hearers hate the truth, cannot bear to hear it, and disli?ie the preacher for uttering it. Thus Ahab said respecting Micaiah, who was a faithful prophet of the Lord and told the king the truth, " I hate him, for he doth not prophesy good concer- ning me, but evil ;" 1 Kings xxii. 8. In hke manner the Jews were Irequently oflended with the prophets, and our Saviour, and his Apostles, for telling them the truth ; and this anger effectually prevented profit from the word. For instead of hating their sins and crucifying them, as they ought to have done, they hated and . persecuted the preachers, who doubtless had the purest benevolence in their hearts towards them. Unless ministers speak the truth of God, they cannot reasonably have any prospect of success. And the truth generally must condemn a poi- tion of the hearers. If therefore those who hear the worI would profit by it, it becomes them as James directs, to *' Receive with meekness the iniirafted word ;" Jam. i. '-]. 424 SERMON xcv. It becomes ihcm to love the truth, however it may con- demn them, and whatever seli'-denial and sacrifice of sel- fish inclinations it may require. When the truth con- demns them, they ought to condemn themselves, and change their conduct instead of cavil with the truth and condemn the preacher, who out of love to their souls faithfully delivers to them the truth of God. 6. If we would profit by the preaching of the word, we ought to /«y ?//? what we hear in our hearts. " Thy word {said David) have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee ;" Ps. cxix. 11. We should labour to trea- sure up what we hear in our memories ; for unless we re- luember what we hear, we can receive but little perma- nent advantage from the word ; our feelings may be exci- ted, but unless we remember what we hear we lay up no- thing for future use. And that we may lay up what we hear in our hearts, and preserve it there, we ought most carefully to avoid every thing, which may have a ten- dency to take away the word, and destroy the impressions which have been made. Hence vain company, or any company whose conversation does not savour of religion, ought to be avoided as much as possible when we come from the house of Giod. Hence also, all vain conversa- tion, or even talking about our worldly business, ought to be avoided, when we are coming out of the house God, or have returned from hearing the word. The seed of the w ord is very easily rooted out. The evil one, as represen- ted in the parable of the sower, ever stands ready to pluck it out of our hearts, lest it should produce a saving effect. And doubtless the word is often rendered unfruitful, be- fore the hearers have left the place of worship by enga- ging in worldly conversation. 7. Lastly. If we would profitably hear the word preach- ed, we must reduce what we hear to practice. Prac- tice is the great end of all preaching. We ought there- fore to hear the word with a view to practice. Should you follow all the other directions and not this, you would tail to derive spiritual profit from the word preached. Ac- cordingly our Saviour hath told us," Whosoever heareth these sayings of mine and doeth them, I will liken him un- to a wise man, which built his house upon a rock ; and the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house ; and it fell not lor it wa5 HEARING THE WORD. 425 founded upon a rock. And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened un- to a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand ; and the rain descended and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house ; and it fell, and great was the fall of it;" M-»t. vii. 24—27. Thus, my brethren, I have pointed out to you, how you ought to hear the word, when it is preached, if you would profit by it. In the conclusion of this discourse, let me urge upon you to take heed how you hear. Remember that this is the command of the Saviour who died for sinners, and will shortly be your judge. Remember that the word which is preached, is that by which you will be tried in the great day of account ; that which is able to make you wise unto salvation, through faith in Christ ; that which is your eternal life ; and that also which if not improved aright will be your eternal death. Every sermon wfiich you hear delivered, agreeably to the word of God, if not heard aright, increases your condemnation. The word of God delivered by his faithful ambassadors, will not return unto him void, but will accomplish something. If it does not prove a savour of life, it will prove a savour of death unto death. If those who come to the house of God were duly impressed with these considerations, they could not rush thoughtlessly into the presence of God ; they would ask his blessing before they came ; they would be filled with reverence in his house ; they would not indulge in light or trifling behaviour or sleep under the preaching of that word which will be life or death to their souls ; and they would with eagerness, receive the word, pray over it, endeavour to remember it, and reduce it to practice. May the Lord enable you my hearers, thus to take heed how you hear, that the word preached may prove an eternal benefit to your souls. — Amen. VOL. IK W; SERiMON XCVL THE SACRAMENTS. ROMAJfS. IV. 11. FIRST CLAUSE. " And he received the sign of circumcision^ a seal of the right- eousness of the faith which he had, yet being uncircumcised.''^ The leading object of the Apostle, in this Epistle, was, to prove the great doctrine of justification by faith with- out the deeds of the law. The Jews held to justification by works, and especially to the necessity of circumcision, and an observance of the ceremonial law. To show that this sentiment was erroneous, and at the same time to es- tabhsh the doctrine ofjustification by faith, the Apostle, among other arguments, adduced the example of Abra- ham, of whom they boasted as their father ; and proved from the Scriptures of the Old Testament, that he was jus- tified by faith as it was written, " He believed in the Lord ; and he counted it to him for righteousness t" Gen. XV. 6. The Apostle then asked the question, " How was it reckoned ?" That is, the faith of Abraham for righteousness. When he was in circumcision, or in uncir- cumcision ?" This question he answered, "Not in circum- cision, but in uncircumcision ;" verse 10. Abraham was not circumcised for many years, after it was said of him, " He believed in the Lord ; and he counted it to him for righteousness." Circumcision therefore could have had no effect upon his justification ; for he was justified be- fore he was circumcised ; and as stated in our text, " He received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteous- ness of the faith which he had, yet being uncircumcised." The object of selecting this text at this time is, to lead to an ilhistrationof the three following questions in our Catechism, which come next in course to be considered, viz. " How do the sacraments become effectual means -of salva- tion ? y THE SACRAMENTS. 427 What is a sacrament ? and, Whic/i are the sacraments of the A^ew Testament ?" Our text, it is true, does not, properly, include all those points; but it will lead to thcni as well, perhaps, as any sinjijle text we can iind. Circumcision was a sacra- ment ot" the covenant of grace under the Old Testament dispensation, and we have in our text its nature pointed out, viz. a sign and seal of spiritual things. And the gen- eral nature of all the sacraments, both under the Old and the New Testament were the same. Therefore our text expresses the general nature of all the sacraments. The first inquiry which claims our attention is, I. " IVhat is a sacrament ?" Our Catechism answers this question. " j1 sacrament is an holy ordincmcc^ instituted by- Christ ; ivherein by sensible signs^ Christ and the benefits of the neiv cov- enant are represented^ sealed^ and applied to believers.'''' The word sacrament is not found in the Scriptures, but the things signified by this Mord are there contained ; and the word was adopted by the primitive fathers to ex- press these things. The word is borrowed from the La- tin, and signifies the military oath in use among the an- cient Romans, which they called sacrammttnn, by which soldiers bound themselves to be faithful to their general. As in those ordinances, wliich we call sacraments, there is a solemn engagement on the part of the receiver to be faithful to Christ. The word sacraments has been adopted, as expressive of these ordinances. " Jl sacrament is an holy ordinance instituted by Christ.''"' Christ was the author of the sacraments. Those of the New Testament were instituted, immediately by himself in person ; and those of the Old Testament may also be said to have been instituted by him ; for we have suflicieiit reason to believe that it was God the Son, who was with the Old Testament church, and so frequently appeared to the saints of that period, and gave to the church, the institutions, with which they were favoured. A sacrament is a positive institution^ the obligation to ob- serve which, arises not from the nature and fitness of things, but solely from the command of the Institutor. — If Christ had not instituted the Sacraments, they would not be binding, and whenever he pleases to repeal them (he obligation to their observance ceases. 428 SERMON xcvr. As to the nature of a sacrament, it is that, " Wherein by sensible signs, Christ and the benefits of the new cove- nant are represented, sealed, and appHed to believers." Hence the parts of a sacrament are two, the outward and sensible signs, and the things signified by those signs. i!i a sacrament, there are outward and sensible signs. Thus in circumcision, there was the cutting off the flesh of the foreskin ; in the passover, there was the slaying of the lamf), the sprinkling of the blood, and the eating of the lamb with unleavened bread, and bitter herbs, and in haste, with their staves in their hands, and their shoes on their feet ; in baptism there is the application of water to the subject; and in the Lord's supper, there is the break- ing and eating of bread, and the drinking of wine. These are all external signs, presented to the senses, and inten- ded to affect them, and through them to affect the soul. — This is a method of instruction, which God has always ta- ken with his church, and which is well suited to our pre- sent state, in which we are naturally more affected by things that strike our senses, than by spiritual ideas, pre- sented without these helps. But in the sacraments we are to look further than mere- ly to the external elements and actions. These are signs; but there is always something of a spiritual nature sig}ii- jied by them. They signify and represent Christ and the blessings of the covenant of grace. Thus in circumcision the sign represented, that the subject deserved to be cut off from the favour of God, and signified that w^ithout shedding of blood there was no remission, and pointed to the blood of Christ, which was to be shed to take away sin. In the passover, the Iamb slain signified the Lamb of God to be slain to take away sin; the sprinkling of the blood, the application of his blood to the soul for the par- dfin of sin; ai;d the eating of the lamb, the necessity of de- pp-'ding or» Christ for the support of spiritual life. In b'spiism, tlie spplicition of water signifies that the subject is fruilty "inil polluted, and represents the pardon of sin through the blood of Christ, and the regeneration and s.nictifiiation of the soul by his Spirit. And in the Lord's Snppr'r, the bread represents the body of Christ broken for us, and the wine his blood shed for us. In a sacrament the sign and the thing signified, are to THE SACRAMENTS. 429 be kept distinct^ and not to be confounded. This has not always been done. The sign and the thing signified have been confounded, and this confusion has been productive of very dangerous errors. Thus baptism has been called regeneration, and persons have supposed themselves real- ly regenerated, and in a state of safety, because they had been baptized. In the Lord's Supper also the sign has been made the thing signified. Thus the bread after consecration, ha? been held to be, not a sign of the body of Christ, but the real body itself, and the wine his real blood. This is call- ed the doctrine of transubstantiation, the truth of which was once generally believed, and scarcely called in ques- tion in the world. A doctrine most absurd, violating every dictate of common sense, and which before this au- dience can need no refutation. The true nature of a sa- crament is, by external signs to represent spiritual things ; and we ought carefully to avoid confounding the one with the other. A sacrament is represented in the answer which we are considering, as a seal also as well as a sign ; and thus is circumcision represented in our text ; " He received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had." A sacrament is a seal of the cove- nant of grace. A seal is a standing evidence of the reali- ty of a covenant ; and it binds the parties to fulfil the arti- cles thereof. So the sacraments are standing evidences of the reality of the covenant of grace; and they not oidy signify the blessings of this covenant ; but they seal the articles, and mutually bind the parties to the performance thereof, on the conditions stated in the covenant. The sacraments are seals, both on the part of God and the re- ceiver. The Lord graciously condescends not only to promise to the believing receiver, but to confirm this promise with the sacraments as seals, that lie will bestow upon him, the blessings of the new covenant signified by these signs. And the receiver obligates himself by the sacraments as seals, that he will be the Lord's and his alone, and that he will faithfully endeavour to perform all the duties required of him in the covenant. The persons to whom the sacraments represent, seal, and apply Christ, and the benefits of the new covenant as stated ill the answer which we are considering are believ- 430 SERMON XCVI. (M's. With respect to adults, the seals of the covenant be- jono- to believers alone, and to none but believers. To those who receive these signs by faith, are the things sig- nified, sealed and applied. And upon none but those who do believe, does God bind himself to bestow the blessings of the new covenant. With respect to all others, they are condemned already ; and ''Unto the wicked, God saith, what hast thou to do to declare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth ;" Ps. l. 16. These remarks apply to adults. There vvas a sacra- ment under the Old Testament, which was applied to in- fants ; and we hold there is one under the New. With respect to infants, they cannot exercise faith ; but still there ought to be faith in the oflferer; and the ordinance which is applied to infants, belongs in the sight of the church to the seed of the visibly faithful. We proceed to inquire, II. '' WJiich are fhe sacraments of the JYew Testament ? The sacraments of the JS'ew Testament are baptism and the Lord's Supper.'''' Under the Old Testament, tliere were tivo sacraments, which were signs and seals of the covenant of grace, viz. circumcision and the passover. These by the coming of Christ were done away. Their abrogation at his coming, w^as implied in their very nature. For being by the shedding of blood, typical of Christ and the shedding of his blood, it was proper when he came and shed his blood, that the seals should be changed, and that others more suited to the New Testament dispensation should be substituted in their room. That the sacraments of the Old Testament have ceased to be obligatory on the church, is evident from tlie Scriptures of the New Testa- ment. Baptism and the Lord's Supper have come in the room of them and signify the same things as far as consists with the difference of dispensation. Baptism and the Lord's Supper, were instituted by Christ himself, while he was upon earth. These sacra- ments are still in force. This has been denied by some, who exclude every thing external from the gospel dispen- sation. But it is certain, Christ instituted these ordi- nances, and that they were observed by the Apostles and disciples after his death, and by the primitive church, and by the church in all^|ge's since, down to THE SACRAMENTS. 41^1 the present time. Besides, there was as much need of these ordinances in future generations, as in the apostoHc age, and we no wliere find them abrogated by divine authority ; and no one but he who instituted them has a right to abrogate them. Further, that baptism was to continue a sacrament in the christian church to the end of the world, appears from the commission which our Sa- viour gave to his apostles after his resurrection, and the promise which he annexed. " Go ye therefore and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and ofthe Holy Ghost. Teaching them to ob- serve all things whatsoever I have commanded you : and lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world ;" Mat. xxviii. 19, 20. The promise here made was intend- ed to strengthen the apostles and their successors, in the performance ofthe duties just assigned them; and as the promise extended to the end of the world, the conclusion is obvious, that the commission to preach and baptize was to continue as long. And that the Lord's Supper was to be a standing ordinance in the church is evident from the words of institution as given us by Paul: "As often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the Lord's death till he come ;" 1 Cor. xi. 26. Whence we learn that in this ordinance, the disciples of Christ were to show forth his death until the end of the world, when he was to come the second time. And as there are two sacraments in the christian church, which are to continue in it till the end of the world, so we believe there are but two. In opposition to this belief the Roman Catholics hold to seven, viz. besides baptism and the Lord's Supper ; confirmation, penance, orders, matrimony, and extreme unction. On the last five I would only observe, that no divine warrant can be pro- duced for their institution as sacraments ; and without this we have no right to consider them as su(;h; and they all want some, if not all ofthe things essential to a sacra- ment. We proceed to consider the III. Point proposed, viz. " How do the sacraments become effectual means of salca- Hon ? The sacraments become effectual means of salvation^ not from any virtue in ihcnu or in him that doth administer 433 SERMON XCVl. them ; but only hy the blessing of Christ, and the working of his Spirit, in them that by faith receive them." The sacraments are important means of salvation. The Apostle taught that circumcision profited much every way ; and the same may doubtless be said of baptism, which has come in its room. And many a believer has borne, and can bear testimony to the inestimable spiritual benefits, which they have derived from the Lord's Sup- per. But the sacraments do not become effectual means of salvation from any virtue in themselves. We have how- ever reason to fear, there are many persons who suppose there is some intrinsic virtue in the elements themselves ; and that they operate as spells or charms to communicate salvation. Hence, looking no further than the simple ele- ments themselves, and destitute of faith, they suppose that if they can get their children baptized, they will be safe, or if they can get baptized themselves, and be admitted to the Lord's Supper, all will be well. This is a most dangerous, though we have reason to believe, not an un- common error. There is no intrinsic virtue in the sacra- ments themselves ; for many receiv^e them who still con- tinue strangers to spiritual blessings. An instance direct- ly in point we have in Simon Magus ; for after he had been baptized, " Peter said unto him. Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter ; for thy heart is not right in the sight ofGod. For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity;" Acts viii. 20, 21, 23. And Paul has taught us that a man may partake of the Lord's Supper, and instead of being sr.ved by it, " be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord," and " eat and drink damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's bo- dy ;" 1 Cor. xi. 27, 29. And we frequently see many who have been baptized, and some who have been at the Lord's Supper, whose whole lives prove that they are not in a state of salvation, and that they have received no ben- efit from these ordinances. Hence it is evident, there is no saving benefit in the ordinances themselves. Neither do the sacraments become effectual from any virtue in him that doth administer them. Or, as it is ex- pressed in our Larger Catechism, " by any virtue deri- ved from the piety or intention of him, by whom they are administered." It does not depend upon the piety of a person who administers an ordinance, whether it shall THE SACRAMENTS. 433 be efficacious or not. Although it be very desirable that none but truly pious men, should be in the gospel minis- try, yet doubtless many have been in this office who were destitute of piety ; and some such have witliout doubt been the instruments, in the hands of God, of saving good to others. For we have known ministers, who had many unequivocal seals to their ministry, and whose adminis- trations of the sacraments were blessed, who, before the close of their lives, abundantly proved by their coi>duct, that they had never experimentally known th;xt reli- gion, which they preached to others. Besides, if piety in the person administering was necessary to the efficacy of a sacrament, the receiver must always be in suspense whether he had received, or could receive any benefit from an ordinance. For who can search the heart, and certainly know, whether the person from whom he re- ceives the sacraments, be pious or not ? These remarks must sufficiently show, that the piety of a minister is not necessary to the validity or efficacy of the ordinances which he administers. Besides, Paul has expressly in- formed us that the efficacy of ordinances does not depend on ministers; " Neither is he tliat planteth any thing, nei- ther he tnat watereth; but God that giveth the increase;" 1 Cor. iii. 7. And as the efficacy of the sacraments, does not depend upon the piety, so neither does it upon tlie in- tention of him who administers them, as the Papists erro- neously hold. For if it did, the minister would be some- thing, and almost every thing in the efficacy of an ordi- nance, contrary to the text just quoted. The same reasons which have just been given to show, that the efficacy of a sacrament does not depend upon the piety of him who ad- ministers it, also prove that it cannot depend upon his in- tention. The efficacy of the sacraments depend on ^'■thc hleS' nng of Christy and the workin^r of his Spirit^ in them that by faith receive them.'''' Christ has put his blessing upon these ordinances of his own institution, and the Holy Spirit uses them as means of grace, and applies them as he does the word, rendering them efTectual to the spiritual good of those who receive them aright. These are they who receive them in faith. Unless we exercise faith in sacra- ments they will be unavailing. This remark, by no means ©perates against infant baptistn; for in the administration TOL. n. 55 434 SERMON XCVI. « of this ordinance to infants, we hold to tlie necessity of faith in the offerer or representative of the child, to ren- der the act acceptable in the sight of God, and have ground for hope of a divine blessing upon the ordinance. Thus brethren, I have taken a general view of the sa- craments. In succeeding discourses, I shall endeavour to treat of each of the sacraments of the New Testament par- ticularly. We have seen that there are but two sacraments in the christian church. Those therefore who would make and observe more, are guilty of will-worship, which the Lord condemns and abhors. We have seen also that these two sacraments were instituted by Christ, who isKinginZion, and that they are still in force ; it is therefore our duty in a right manner to observe them. This duty is enforced by the authority, and by the love of Christ; and they are criminal in the sight of God, who neglect these sacraments, or either of them. We have seen the nature of the sacra- ments, that their object is to signify and seal spiritual things by external signs. Let us be careful and not con- found the signs, and the things signified. Let us not lay a stress upon receiving the outward elements to the neg- lect of the things signified. Those only who use them in faith use them aright and profitably. Let us then ap- proach them in the exercise of faith, and look by faith through the external signs to the things signified. Let us realize the condescension and goodness of God in sealing blessing s to us in these ordinances ; let us realize also the obligations which, by coming to these ordinances, we seal and irrevocably bind ourselves to perform. And let us ever receive the sacraments, depending on the blessing of Christ and the working of his Spirit to render them effect- ual.— Amen. SERMON XCVII. BAPTISM. MATTHEW XXVIII. 19. '• Go ye therefore and teach all nations^ baptizing them in the name of the Father^ and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:' This is the commission which our Lord gave to his a- postles, and through them to the ministers ofthe gospel in every age, after he had risen from the dead, and just be- fore he ascended to his glory. He had now finished the work, for which he came into the world, and had fully brought to an end the Old Testament dispensation of the covenant of grace, which looked forward to him as to come, A new dispensation was now to be introduced, in which Christ was to be considered, and received, as al- ready come. To introduce this new dispensation, the a- postles were now commissioned and sent forth. Those who received ihis new dispensation were now to consti- tute the true cliurch ; and the ordinance of admission to a visible standing in the church, was now to be baptism, which took the place of circumcision. The apostles were commissioned to go to all nations. Heretofore the church had been confined to the Jews ; but now the Gentiles were to be brought in. The apostfes were first to teach or disciple those to whom they went ; or to instruct them in the nature ofthe gospel dispensa- tion ofthe grace of God, and induce them to embrace it ; and on their embracing it, they were to baptize them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, and thus introduce them to a visible standing in the church of Christ. Our text will lead us to treat ofthe subject of^ baptism. On the last Sabbath morning we attended to an illustra- tion of the sacraments generally. The way is now pre- pared to treat of each of the sacraments in particular. 436 SERMON XCVH. Baptism comes first in order. In our Catechism, the doc- trine is stated as follows in the answer to the 94th ques- tion. " fV/iat is baptism ? Baptism is a sacrament^ tvherein the washing with wafer^ in the name of the Father^ and of the Son, and of the Ho- ly Ghost, doth signify and seal our ingrafting into Christ, and partaking of the benefits of the covenant of grace, and our engairement to be the Lord's.''' On the subject of baptism, some controverted points will necessHrily claim our attention, which I shall endeav- our to handle with meekness, and candour, and in the spirit of christian charity towards those, who may differ from me in sentiment. The object in this discourse is, I. To explain the nature of baptism. II. To consider the proper mode of applying water in th« ordinance. I. Let us attend to a few remarks on the nature of bap- tism. baptism is a sacrament. As such, its general nature has already been illustrated under the head of the sacra- mv"nts. It is a sacrament of the New Testament. It was instituted when the New Testament dispensation was in- troduced ; and it was instituted by Christ himself The sig;5i in this ordinance is the application, of water, and of water only, without the addition of ^ny thing else, to l!je subject. The mode in which water is to be ap- phed we shall consider hereafter. Baptism is to be administered in the name of the Trinity, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. By this are acknow- ledged, that there is a Trinity of persons in the God-head; , that the person baptized is devoted to this triune God ; , '\ that all the saving blessings signified in this ordinance are given by the Father, for the sake of the Son, and through the application of the Holy Ghost; and that all the per- sons of the Trinity are engaged in the work of salvation, and proflfhr blessings to the subject of the ordinance. Baptism in the name of the Trinity is essential to the va- lidity of the ordinance ; and it is also essential to its va- lidity that it be performed by a minister of the gospel ; for in our text the commission was given to such, and we have no account in Scripture, that the ordinance was ad- BAPTISM. 437 ministered by any others, than those authorized to preach the gospel. The things signified in baptism are the blood and Spiri( of Christ. The water implies that we are polluted and guilty by sin ; and represents to us justification by the blood oFChrist, and regeneration and sanctification by his Spirit. It signilies and seals our ingraiting into Christ, and partaking of the benefits of the covenant of grace and our engagement to be the Lord's. It signifies these things. It is a sign of ingrafting into Christ. Not that a person by receiving this ordinance, does become really united to Christ, and savingly interest- ed in him ; but that this ordinance is a sign of this union and represents it. It is also a sign of partaking of the benefits of the covenant of grace. All the blessings of this covenant, which were purchased by the blood of Christ, and which are applied by the Holy Spirit, are sig- nified by the water in this ordinance, and are hereby re- presented as oflered to us. And it is also a sign of our engagements to be the Lord's. It signifies that the sub- ject is devoted to the service of the triune God. Baptism is also a seal of these things. A seal is a stand- ing evidence of the reality of a covenant, and it binds the parties to the performance of the conditions. Baptism is a standing evidence of the reality of the covenant of grace; and God hereby graciously obligates himself to bestow the things signified in baptism ; or Christ, and all the benefits of the covenant of grace, on those who believe in the Saviour. And the subject baptized, hereby be- comes solemnly engaged to be the Lord's. Hence we may see the propriety of requiring engage- ments of persons, when they offer themselves, or when, as the representatives of their children, they offer them in baptism. Some object to such engagements. But if bap- tism be a seal of the covenant of grace — and that it is, is evident, if it has come in the room of circumcision : for Abraham " received the sign of circumcision, a.9ea/of the righteousness of the faith which he had;" Rom. iv. 11 ; then every person who comes to this ordinance does vir- tually engage and does really and firmly bind himself, to perform all that we require him to promise, whether he does formally promise or not. Baptism is a seal of the covenant of grace; and you do therefore in this ordinance. -138 SERBION XCVII. when you either offer yourselves, or as their representa- tives, present your children, avouqh the Lord to be your God, and bind yourselves to be his people, whether you make any explicit engagements or not. And the engage- ments which we require, are only those which you bind yourselves to fulfil by setting your seal to them in receiving the ordinance. How absurd would it be for a man to set his seal to a covenant, and thereby bind him- self to fulfil the articles of it, when at the same time, if it were read to him, he would be unwilling to give his as- sent to it ! Equally absurd would it be to set our seal of baptism to God's covenant, and thereby bind ourselves to perform what is therein required, and yet when what is required is recited to us, be unwilling to give our as- sent. We proceed, II. To consider the proper mode of applying water, in the ordinance of baptism. This is a subject, which for a few centuries, has been considerably agitated in the christian church. Some hold the immersion or dipping of the whole body to be essen- tial to the ordinance, and the only true mode of baptism ; and consider all persons who have pretended to receive it in any other way, to have received it in vain, and to be unbaptized persons. On the contrary we, with the great- er part of the christian church, hold, that sprinkling, or pouring of water, or washing with it, or in any way apply- ing it to the body, or any part of it, is a proper mode of baptism. Embracing, with a spirit of christian charity, those who may differ from us in opinion, or practice, on this circumstantial of our religion (for it certainly cannot be an essential, involving our salvation) I beg a candid, unprejudiced, and impartial hearing, while I endeavour to offer some reasons, in support of our practice. It is readily and cheerfully granted, that baptism by immersion, or plunging, or dipping, is real baptism, and that the ordinance may be rightly administered in this way ; and we do not pretend to baptize again, those who join our churches, after they have received the ordinance in this way. But at the same time we hold, that as water is only a sign, and in itself confers no grace, a handful is as good as an ocean, and equally answers the purpose of a feign. We hold that no mode, to the exclusion of all oth- MODE OF BAPTISM. 439 ers, is taught in the Scriptures ; and that the mode wheth- er by immersion, pouring, washing, or sprinkhng, is indif- ferent, as to the right administration of the ordinance, and its acceptableness in the sight of God. Although at the same time we beheve, there are reasons which render one mode more expedient than another. That immersion is not essential to the right administra- tion of the ordinance ; but that it is rightly administered by pouring, washing, or sprinkling, we proceed now to prove. 1. From the meaning of the word. The advocates of immersion as essential to the validity of the ordinance have laid much stress upon this. I am not accustomed, in my sermons to enter into criticisms on words; but I feel myself constrained to do it here; because much stress has been laid upon the original word, as always signifying immersion and nothing else ; and hence has been inferred that baptism and immersion signify the same thing. — The original word used for baptize in the Scriptures, is baptizo^ which is derived from bapto. The word bapto is never used when the ordinance of baptism is meant. — However as this is the root from which bopfizo is deri- ved, it will be proper to make a few observations upon it. It is acknowledged that this word signifies to dip, but this is not its only meaning. We find the word used in the Septuagint translation of the Bible, in the following pas- sage in Daniel, " His body was ivet (or baptized) with the dew of heaven ;" Dan. iv. .33. Here the word is used to express a wetting with the dew, which certainly was not by immersion. Homer, whose authority for the right use of Greek words no scholar will question, used this w ord to express a colouring or staining of a lake with blood. Ar- istophanes another Greek writer uses it to express a be- smearino; the face with certain washes. And Aristotle uses it to express a staining the hand witli a certain sub- stance pressed in it. From these instances we confiderft- ly draw the conclusion, that the word baplo does not exclusively signify immersion ; but that it may signify any kind of wetting, whatever the mode may be. And there- fore if anything is to be concluded as to mode from the meaning of the word bapto^ it is, that water applied in any %vay in this ordinance, is baptism. We shall come to thc^ same conclusion if we consider the meaning of the word 440 SERMON XCVII. baptizo, derived from hapto. Baptizo is the word used, whenever the ordinance of baptism is meant. To un- derstand the real meaning of this word, let us examine some of those passages of scripture, in which the ordinance of Baptism is not meant ; and if it can be shown that the word is ever used in any other sense than to immerse, the conclusion will necessarily follow, that no argument can be drawn from the meaning of the word, in favour of im- mersion as the only mode. In Hebrews ix. 10, the A- postle speaking of the Jewish worship says, "Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings," in the original, baptisms. In the ceremonial washings which are here expressed by the word used for baptisms, water was undoubtedly applied, as must appear if we look through the ceremonial law, by pouring and sprinkling, as well as by dipping. Our Saviour speaking of the tradi- tions of the elders, held by the Pharisees, Mark. vii. 4 ; said, " And many other things there be, which they have received to hold, as the washing of cups and pots, l^rasen vessels, and of tables." In this passage the m ord transla- ted washing, is in the original, baptism ; and here the word is used to express any kind of washing. Some of the vessels, mentioned in this pissage, may have been dipped in water when they were washed or baptized, though this is not certain ; but it is highly probable, that to some of them, such as tables, the water was applied by pouring or sprinkling, and not by dipping. In the same chapter our Saviour speaking of the Pharisees said, "When they come from the market, except they wash, (in the original, baptize) they eat not;" Mark. vii. 4. I ask, is it at all pro- bable that the word here signifies immersion ? The Pha- risees, every time they came from the market, before they ate, washed or baptized themselves. It is not at all pro- bable, that they every time immersed themselves. Again, a Pharisee, seeing our Saviour eat with unwashed hands, m«rvelled that he had not first washed (original baptized) before dinner;" Luk. xi. 38. Here the word which is u- sed to express baptism, is used for the washing of hands. But in washing the hands, it is not necessary that they be immersed. If a Pharisee washed or baptized his hand? in a b:isin, he would probably immerse them, in whole or m part ; but if he M'ashed or baptized ata spout of water, he would not immerse them at all. The obvious inference MODE OP BAPTISM. 441 from all tlicse passages is, that the original word for bap- tisiii does not signify immersion ; but washing, without re- gard to the mode in which the water is applied. And therefore the conclusion is, that no argument in f ivour of iminersion, as the only mode of baptism, can be drawn from the meaning of the original word ; but on the other hand, as the word is used to express every kind of wash- ing, in whatever way water may be applied, it argues that the application of water in any way, in this ordinance is baptism. 2. That immersion is not essential to the right admin- istration of the ordinance of baptism ; but that the ordi- nance is rightly administered, by the application of water in any other way, may be proved from the circumstances attending the baptisms recorded in the Scriptures. John is said to have baptized in Jordan ; and also in iEnon near to Salim, because there was much water there. And our Saviour is said to have been baptized of John in Jordan ; and when he was baptized, to have come up straightwiy out of the water. On the baptisms of John, I would ob- serve, that even admitting he baptized by immersion, his example ought not to be adduced as a certain evidence of the mode of christian baptism ; for John's baptism was not christian Imptism. In proof of this assertion, mmy arguments might be adduced. But one is suffi- cient. In the 19th chapter of the Acts of the apostles we find Paul at Ephesus, baptizing in the name of Christ, some who told him that they had before received John's baptism. This he certainly would not have done, if the baptism of John had been christian baptism. But admitting that the baptism of John was a proper pre- cedent for the mode of christian baptism, and that he baptized by immersion, it would only prove that im- mersion is a right mode, but not at all that every other mode is wrong. But even this cannot be proved. It may- be that he did immerse ; but I will confidently assert that it cannot be certainly proved that he did in a Sjingle in- stance. Neither can it be proved, that there was a single instance of it in all the examples of Scripture. On John's baptizing in ^non near to Sahm, because there was much water there, much stress is laid ; but the original signi- nes many waters, or many streams ot water; and travellers tell us there are many small brooks in that region, but none VOL. 1I» 5t) 442 SERMON XCVII. of them above ankle deep. That John is said to have bap- tized in Jordan, and the persons baptized are said to have , translated into, as in the passage, "• They went down into the water ;" Acts viii. 38, signifies also to or unto; and that the words opo and ek translated out of, as in the passage, " When they were come up out of the water ;" Acts viii. 39, might with equal propriety have been translated /row?-. So that these ex- pressions on which so much stress is often laid — such as " Baptized in the river of Jordan ; they went down into the water, and when they were come up out of the water,'* may signify according to the frequent use of the words, baptized at, near, or by Jordan ; they went down to the water, and they came up from the water. From these remarks the conclusion is confidently drawn, that there is nothing in the account which we have of John's mode of baptism, that proves immersion to be the only proper mode. Review the reasoning. John's baptism was not christian baptism. If it were, and it were certain he bap- tized by immersion, it would only prove the ordinance is rightly administered in this way ; but not at all that every other way is wrong. But it cannot be proved that he certainly administered it in this way. Even admitting it to I e true, as our English translation renders the ori- gin-il, that they went down into the water, this does not prove that the baptized went under the w;>ter. But fur- ther there is no certain evidence that they even stepped MODE OF BAPTISM. 443 into the water or wet their feet, as the original words will bear translating, they went down to^ and came up from the waler. The same remarks which were made on John's bap- tism show that notiiing can be proved as to the mode from the baptism otthe eunuch by i^fnlip. On this instcince, I would only remark, that il it proves anything in lliVour of immersion, it proves too much. For there is as much evi- dence from the history that Philip went under the water, as that the eunuch did. The history is as follows, '' And they went down both, into the water, both Philip and the eunuci] ; and he baptized him. And when they were come up out of the water ;" Acts viii. 38, 39. We have now examined the strongest examples in favour of immer- sion, and have seen that they contain no certain evidence that immersion was practised at all, and much less that it is the only proper mode. Let us now attend to some other instances, where we have at least presumptive evidence against immersion. There were three thousand baptized in Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost. We do not hear that they were im- mersed, or that they were by a stream or pool of water. Peter baptized Cornelius and those that were collected in his house ; and we have every reason to believe that they were baptized in the house ; for we do not hear that they went out ; and it is not at all probable, that there were conveniences in the house for immersing them. Paul also baptized the jailer and his household ; and it is certainly, very improbable, that he, a prisoner, went out of the precincts of the prison, in the night, to seek a place suitable for immersion; and it is equally improbable, that there was a place suitable for it in the prison. In all these instances, the presumption is certainly against im- mersion. And it is worthy of remark that in all the in- stances of baptism recorded in vScripture, there is not a single instance mentioned of the baptizer, and persons to be baptized, leaving the place where they were worship- ing, and going to some other to seek water to be bapti- zed. But in every instance as soon as they were ready to receive baptism, we find themimmediately baptized, in the place in which they then were, whether it was by a river side, on the road, in the city, in a house, or in a prison ; and in no instance is the particular mode mentioned. Can it 444 SERMON xcvit. be possible then that a particular mode is essential to the Taiiuiij ol the ordiiiance? Most assuredly it'it is, we might have expected that mode to have been particularly point- ed out. 3. That immersion is not essential to the ordinance of baptism, but that it is rightly administered, by pouring, sprinkling, or washing, may be further proved from the Scripture allusions to this ordinance. We are said to be buned with Christ by baptism. The passage is found, Rom. vi 3, 4 ; "Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ, were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death." There is a similar passage, Col. ii. 12. "Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him." Much stress has been laid upon these passages to prove that immersion is the only proper mode. But if there be an allusion to the mode at all in these passages, w hich is cer- iaiuly doubtful, they only prove that immersion is a pro- per mode, and not that it is the only mode. But there is no certain evidence that the Apostle alludes at all to the mode. It is evident he is speaking of the spiritual mean- ing of baptism. It signified our union to Christ, and con- formity to him, in his death, burial, and resurrection. By baptism we profess that as he died, so we have become dead to sin ; as he was buried, so sin in our souls should be buried ; and as he rose from the dead, so should we j'ise unto newness of life. In the same connexion, we are said by baptism to he planted together in the likeness of his death, to have our old man crncificd with him, and to be circumcised in him. If in the word bnried, therefore, there is an allusion to the mode of baptism, there is equal reason to suppose an allusion in the words planted, cnicif.- c(/, and circumcised^ which is not plead for. If we suppose the mode to be alluded to in these passages, we must car- ry the allusion through, and to be consistent, and correct, must have something in the mode to express planting, crucifixion, and circumcision, as well as burial. Let us now attend to the allusions in Scripture which favour our mode of administering the ordinance. The things signified by baptism, as has been observed, are the blood of Christ by which we are justified, and his Spirit by which we are renewed and sanctified. These are fre- fjuently represented by sprinkling, and pouring. Thus MODE OF BAPTISM. Ai't tve know that under the Old Testament dispensation, the blood ofChrist, which was to take avvaj sin was constant- ly represented hy the spriiikhng of the Mood of the nu- merous sacrifices which were ofFered. I need not point you to particular passages. 'I'he books of Moses abound with them. In tlie epistle to the Hebrews the blood of Christ is called " the blood of sprinkling ;" Heb. xii. 24. And Peter also speaks " of the sprinkling of the blood of .Jesus Christ ;" 1 Pet. i. 2. As therefore baptism repre- sents the l)lood of Christ, spiritually sprinkled on our hearts, tor the pardon of sin, it is very properly and ex- pressively performed by sprinkling. The prophet Isaiah, speaking of Christ and gospel times, seemed to predict the ordinance of baptism by sprinkling. "As many (said lie) were astonished at thee ; (his visage was so marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men ;) so shall he sprinkle many nations;" Is. lii. 14, IT). Ezekicl also seemed to predict the same, when speaking of gospel times he said, " Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you and ye shall be clean ;" Ezek. xxxvi. 25. The influences of the Holy Spirit, which is the other thing signified by baptism, are also frequently represent- ed by sprinkling and pouring. The Spirit is said to '•''come flown like rain upon the mown grass; as showers that water the earth ;*' Ps. Ixxii. 6. And in the epistle to the Hebrews we read, "Let us draw near with a true heart, liaving our hearts sprinkled t\om an evil conscience;" Heb. X. 22. The Scriptures frequently speak of baptism with the Holy Ghost: and baptism with water is evidently a sign of baptism with the Holy Ghost. Just before his ascen- sion, our Saviour promised to his apostles, " Ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost, not many days hence;" Acts i. 5. This promise was fulfiled o[i the day of Pente- cost. Now how were they baptized with the Holy Ghost on tliat day ? We learn from the 2d chapter of the Acts of the Apostles, which gives an account otthat baptizing, wliere, in one place the Spirit is said to he poured out, and in another shed down. And in the 10th chapter of the Acts* where we have an account of Peter's preaching in the house of Cornelius, it is recorded, "While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them 446 SERMON XCVII. which heard the word. And they of the circumcision which believed, were astonished as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was ^jow/ec/ o«^ the gift of the Holy Ghost ; Acts x. 44, 45. From all these texts, it is evident that the things signified 1 y bap- tism, are very frequently expressed by sprinkling, and pouring; and indeed they are far more frequentlj' ex- pressed by these terms than by any which signily immer- sion ; and hence we conclude that the sign is properly performed by sprinkling or pouring. And i would observe further, that these are by far the most expedient modes, as they are adapted to all ages, to all situations, to all circumstances, to all countries, and to all seasons, which the mode of immersion is not. And further I would ask the question, if uone but those who have been immersed are truly baptized, is il .1 all probable, that God would bless, as he does, those, who on this principle neglect the ordinance of baptism, which is so frequently enjoined ? There can be no question, but the Lord blesses with the things signified by baptism, many of those societies, which only sprinkle or pour, as much at least, as he does those which immerse. They have the testimony of God in the saving blessings which he be- stows that he approves of their mode. Look at the fre- quent and extensive revivals of religion, with which our church has been, blessed ? And would God so greatly bless us, if we are all living in the constant neglect of a very important ordinance, and have no visible connexion with his covenant ? Our brethren may disown us, and refuse to hold communion with us, because in their esti- mation we are unbaptized persons, aliens from the com- monwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise ; but the Lord has given the best of testimonies that, he owns us as a part of his church, by the Hol^ Spirit which he hath given us. I ask again brethren, is it possi- ble that the long list of eminent saints who have been greatly useful in the world, in promoting the cause of Christ, and who were admitted to intimate communion with him, were unbaptized persons, and did not belong to his church on earth ? Were such men as Owen, and Baxter, and Flavel, and Watts, and Doddridge, ruul.New- ton, uid Scott, and Edwards, and Dickinson, and Dnvies, and thousands of olhers like them, unbaptized persons, INFAP?T BAPTISM. 447 ^nd without a standing in the church of Christ on earth ? It cannot be. Eut enough has been said to convince every unprejudi- ced mind, that immersion is not essentially necessary to baptism ; but thnt it is rightly performed by sprinkling, pouring, or washing. If immersion were necessary to the validity of such an important ordinance, we might cer- tainly expect a ' thus saith the Lord', for it ; but none can be produced. The original word signifies any kind of washing. No example can be produced in Scripture, froiu which it certainly appears, that immersion was used, while there are examples in which the probabihty is that it was not used. The things signified by baptism are more frequently represented by sprinkling and pouring than in any other way. God has eminently blessed those who use pouring and sprinkling. And these are modes which are best adapted to all circumstances. Hence we conclude, that while baptism is rightly performed by im- mersion, it is also rightly performed by pouring or sprink- ling ; and that the latter are the more expedient modes. SERMON XCVIII. INFANT BAPTISM. Matthew XXVIII. 19. *' Go ye therefore and teach all nations^ bapfhing them in the naiiu of the Father^ and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:' On the last Sabbath we attended to the general nature ©f baptism, and the mode in which it is rightly adminis- tered. We come n«w to treat of the proper subjects of this ordinance. Should baptism be administered only to adults ? Or ought it to be administered nlso to intaiits ? The former is held by some. But we, with far the greater 448 SERMON XCVIll. part of the christian church, affirm the latter, and ac- corclinglj practice. The object at present is to prove that infants ought to be baptized. And here it may be proper to remark, that the object is only to establish the right of infants in general, without intending to intimate, that all infants indiscriminately, whatever be the qualifications of parents, have this right. The right of infants to baptism we argue, From infant circumcision. Circumcision was a seal of the covenant which God made with Abraham. This was the covenant of grace. Infants of eight days old, were admitted to circumcision, and thus were introduced to a visible standing in the covenant of grace. Baptism has come in the room of circumcision ; and therefore should be applied to the same subjects, unless a command to the contrary can be produced. This cannot be done. And therefore infants are to be baptized. The correctness of this reasoning, and of the conclusion drawn from it, I will now proceed to show. The first point to be settled and one of great import- ance on this subject is, was the covenant which God made with Abraham, the covenant of grace } What re- lates to this covenant we have contained in the 12th, 13th, 15th, 17th, and 22nd chapters of Genesis. The passages are too long to quote in this place. In this cov- enant God made several promises to Abraham and his seed. These promises on examining the chapters just mentioned, we find may be reduced to the following par- ticulars, viz. that Abraham's name should be great ; that he should be a great blessing ; that God would bless them that blessed him, and curse them that cursed him ; that he should have a numerous seed ; that when in bondage in Egypt they should be delivered therefrom : that thcj should inherit the land of Canaan, and be powerful pos- sessing the gates of their enemies ; that he would be A- braham's shield and exceeding great reward, his God and the God of his seed ; and that in him and his seed all the families and nations of the earth should be blessed. Such were the promises of the covenant made with Abra- ham. • In this covenant we assert was contained the covenant of grace. It is true, some of these promises related io IWANT BAPTISM. 4i9 temporal blessings. Of this nature were the promises of a numerous seed, their deliverance from Egyptian bon- dage, their inheriting the land of Canaan, and their pos- sessing the gates of their enemies. But even these prom- ises had a connexion with the covenant of grace. And although some say, we tind nothing of the covenant of grace in the whole of the Abrahamic covenant; yet, per- haps, there was not a promise in that covenant, which had not a reference to the covenant of grace. Even those promises, in tliis covenant, which we allow to have been of a temporal nature, were promises of the covenant of grace, in like manner, as under the New Testament, god- liness has the promise of the life that now is. Besides, the promise of a numerous progeny, as will be shown pres- ently, looked further than the natural seed of Abraham ; embracing also the spiritual seed of Christ, who was ac- cording to the flesh, the Seed of Abraham. Also the land of Canaan, though a temporal blessing, was given to be the dwelling place of the church, that it might be separa- ted from the world ; and to be to the spiritual seed a type, and an earnest of the heavenly inheritance. The deliver- ance from Egyptian bondage was not merely the deliver- ance of Israel considered as a nation ; but also and more especially as the church of God. And the seed possess- ing the gat^s of their enemies, may refer to the victories of the church, as well as of Israel considered as a nation. And in fact, it does appear, that instead of there being nothing spiritual in the covenant made with Abraham, the principal and ultimate meaning of every word in that cov- enant was spiritual ; and every word was connected with the carrying on of the great plan of redemption through a Saviour to come. But let us attend more particularly to the proof of the proposition, that the covenant made with Abraham, was not a mere national, and temporal covenant, containing only temporal promises of national or individual blessings; but that i.it contained promises of spiritual and eternal blessings, and was really the covenant of grace. 1. One of the promises of the covenant made with A- braham was, that he should have a numerous seed. This promise we have contained in the following passages. Gon. xii. 2 ; "I will make of thee a great nation." Gen. xiii. I (3 ; "I will make thj seed as the dust of the earth : so VOL. If. 57 450 SERMON xcviir. that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shali thy seed also be numbered." Gen. xv. 5 ; "And he brought him forth abroad, and said, look now totVard heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him so shall thy seed be." Gen. xvii. 2, 4, 5, 6 ; *'I will multiply thee exceedingly — thou shalt be a father of many nations. And I will make thee exceeding fruit- ful, and 1 will make nations of thee and kings shall come out of thee." And Gen. xxii. 17 ; "In multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore." These were the pro- mises of the covenant, respecting the numerous seed of Abrahim. These promises were literally fulfilled; for the natural posterity of Abraham were very numerous. Not only the Israelites ; but also the Ishmaehtes, and Midianites, and Sabeans, and Shu bites, and Ash u rites, and Edomites all sprang from him. But the promise of a nu- merous seed had also a spiritual meaning ; and related to a numerous seed of believers in Christ, not only of the natural posterity of Abraham ; but of every nation under heaven,. who have come, or shall yet come to the know- ledge of the truth as it is in Jesus. It was in this sense, especially and emphatically that God promised to A- broham, that his seed should be as the stars of heav- en, and as the sand that is by the sea shore. For this assertion we have the unquestionable authority of the New Testament. Rom. iv. 11, \6, 17; "That he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised. Therefore it (that is the promise) is of faith, that it might be by grace ; to the end that the promise might be sure to all the seed, not to that on- ly which is of the law (that is the Israelites) but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all, as it is written (quoting the very promise of the covenant which we are considering) I have made thee a father of many nations. Also, Gal. iii, 9. 28, 29 ; They •which be of faith are blessed with faithful Ahraham. There is neither Jew nor Greek — ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ's, then are ye also Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise." From these texts it clearly appears, that believers of every nation, as well as the natural posterity of Abraham, were intend v^d H the promise of a numerous seed. And therefore the INFANT BAPTISM. 451 covenant made with Abraham was not merely a national covenant Irut the covenant of grace. 2. A second remarkable promise in this covenant was, that in Abraham and his seed should all the families and nations of the earth be blessed. This promise we have in the two following passages : Gen. xii. 3 ; "In thee shall all , families of the earth be blessed." Gen. xxii. 18; "In thy Seed shall all nations of the earth be blessed." It could not be true in any other than a spiritual sense, that in A- braham and his Seed should all the families and nations of the earth be blessed ; for the temporal blessings promis- ed to Abraham never have, and never will come upon all the families and nations of the earth. This promise must be understood in a spiritual sense, as having a particular reference to the Messiah, who according to the flesh was to spring from Abraham, and to the blessings of grace which through him were to be offered and extended to all natio.is. For the earth is yet to be filled with the know- ledge of the Lord and of his grace through Christ ; and then will all the families and nations of the earth be bless- ed in Abraham, and his Seed Christ. The New Testa- ment has placed this matter in a clear light, and unequiv- ocally favours this interpretation of the promise in the Abrahamic covetiant, which we are considering. Peter preaching to the Jews, Acts iii. 25 ; made use of this pro- mise as a reason why they should accept Christ and his gospel ; because they were the natural descendants of Abraham, to whom more especially this promise was made ; and thus evidently applied it to Christ and his gos- pel. "Ye are (said he) the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, and in thy Seed shall all the kind- reds of the earth be blessed." And on this account it was that the gospel was first preached unto the Jews, as Peter added in the next verse, "Unto you first, God hav- ing raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turn- ing away every one of you from his iniquities." Agaia that the promise we are considering, was a promise ofa Saviour, and of spiritual blessings through him is unques- tionably proved from Gal. iii. 8. The Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Heathen, through faith, preach- ed before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, in thee shall all nations be blessed.'* Observe, it is here expressly 452 SERMON XCVIII. said, that the gospelivas preached in this article of the Abra- hamic covenant, " In thee shall all nations be blessed." Again, in the 1 6th verse of the same chapter we read, *' Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He saitK not, and to seeds, as of many ; but as of one, and to thy Seed, which is Christ^ Here the Seed spoken of in the Abrahamic covenant is expressly said to be Christ. From the above texts it is clearly evident, that Christ and his gospel were contained in the Abrahamic covenant; and if so, most assuredly it was the covenant of grace. 3. Another remarkable promise of the Abrahamic cov- enant was, thatGod would be Abraham's God, and the God of his seed. This promise we have contained, Gen. xvii. 7, 8; "I will establish my covenant between me and thee, and thy seed after thee, in their generations, for an ever- lasting covenant ; to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after 'thee. And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein tliou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession ; and / ivill be their God.^'' 'J his promise of the Abrahamic covenant, that God would be Abraham's God, and the God of his seed, was a promise not merely of earthly good things ; but of spiritu- al and eternal blessings. For we find in the New Testa- ment, that this promise is the sum of all the blessings pro- mised in the covenant of grace. Agreeably to this the Apostle, Heb. viii. 10, speaking of the New Testament dispensation of the covenant of grace, said, quoting the words of Jeremiah, "This is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord ; I will put my laws into their mii d, and write them in their hearts: '•'• Jind I ivill be to them a God.''"' That the cove- nant of grace is meant in this passage is unquestionable : but the sum of the blessings of this covenant, are here in- cluded in the promise, "I will be to them a God." And Rev. xxi. 3 ; the whole sum of spiritual and eternal bles- sings are thus expressed, "God himself shall be with them, and be their God." And indeed a greater good than this cannot possibly be promised ; for if God be ours, every other blessing must be ours. P^ut that this promise, in the Abrahamic coven, , '-efe^red to spiritual and eternal blessings, further app- ^ frouj the applica- tion of it by the Apostle, Heb. xi. 16; where speaking of INFANT BAPTISM. 453 the natural seed of Abraham that died in fnith he said, *vBut now they desire a better country, that is an heaven- ly : wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God.'''' This text certainly teaches us, that God was called the God of the natural seed of Abraham of wiiom the Apostle here spoke, in a higher sense, than as a political head, or a temporal benefactor. But with the unprejudiced mind the exposition which our Saviour gave of this promise, ■when he proved from it to the Sadducees, the resurrec- tion of the dead and a future state of blessedness, must place this matter beyond doubt ; *' But as touching the resurrection of the dead (said he) have ye not read that ^vhich was spoken unto you by God, saying, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, ai.d the God of Ja- cob.^ God is not the God of the dead but of the living;" Mat. xxii. 31, 32. It is objected to the interpretation which we have giv- en and endeavoured to establish, of this promise, that if it imported that God would be the everlasting God of A- braham and his seed, it would imply that all the natural seed of Abraham were saved ? To this I answer; it is evident that the seed is to betaken in a restricted sense: for although Abraham had many children, yet the Lord said to him, "In Isaac shall thy seed be called;" Gen. xx. 12. Esau was afterwards cast off, and the promise re- stricted to Jacob and his children. And theApostle hath told us, " They are not all Israel, which are of Israel ;" Rom. ix. 6. In which he restricted the promise in its sa- ving application to the believing seed of Jacob. The ob- jection therefore will not lie against what has been said. The import of the promise, " i will be the God of your seed," I suppose to be this, that God covenanted to be the everlasting God of all the believing seed of Abraham; and further that he would keep up his church, among the natural circumcised seed of Abraham, in the line of Isaac and Jacob, until Christ should come and be externally in a spiritual sense their God, in the same sense as he is vis- ibly the God of every professor of religion under the New Testament; and further that he would keep up among the natural circumcised seed, a spiritual believing seed, to which he would be really, and in the hig'iest sense a God,untilChrist the eminent Seed s'.iould come, ilege, as we learn from the answer which the apostle gave to the question, " What profit is there of circumcis- ion } much every way ;" Rom. iii. 1,2. Since then cir- cumcision was a privilege and has ceased, if nothing has come in its room, Christ has abridged the privileges of the church, which is contrary to the whole tenor of the New Testament. From all these considerations we draw the conclusion, that baptism nnder the New Testament dispensation of the covenant of grace has come in the room of circumcis- ion under the old. Both are initiating ordinances, both signify and seal the same things, they are identified by the apostle, the privileges of the church have been enlarged, and circumcision was a privilege, and in addition to all these the one ceased about the time the other was institu- ted. Considering this point now as established, that baptism fias come in the room of circumcision as a seal of the cov- enant of grace, the consequence will follow, that baptism INFANT BAPTISM. 459 is to be appliecl to the same subjects now, as circmncision was ibrmerly, unless we can find a direction of God in his word forbidding it. For the change of the seal does not affect the covenant or the subjects. As for instance should the leader of an army see proper to change the nnilbrm of his soldiers, or the badge by which they had been distinguished as his — there would be no necessity of pointing out who should wear it. The same persons who had been entitled to wear the old badge, would of course wear the new one, unless they were forbidden. In like manner when our Saviour instituted baptism as the ordinance of admission into his vis^Dle church, and gave to his apostles the commission contained in our text; there was no necessity that he should point out the subjects of this ordinance, unless he intended to take away the right of admission into his visible church from some who had before possessed it. For the apostles would of course apply the new seal to the same description of persons as had before received the old. As under the old dispensation the proselytes who were received into the church from the (jentile world, had first to be taught the nature of the Jewish religion, and to profess their faith in it, before they could be circumcised and admitted to a standing in the church ; but being circumcised and admitted themselves, their children were entitled of course — so the apostles when commissioned to baptize, would naturally, unless forbidden, pursue the same course. They would first teach the nature of the christian dispensation, and those adults who professed to believe in it they would baptize, and then apply the seal to their children of course, as comii]g in with them. It does not lie upon us to prove that there is an express command in the New Testament for infant baptism ; but upon those who deny infant baptism, to prove that it is forl)idden ; and until this is done the argument for infant baptism from infant circumcision will remain unshaken. For infants once had a visible standing in the church and the covenant of grace. This right was given to them by God himself; and none but God has a right to take it a- way. Has he then taken away this right ? Has he for- bidden children to be any more introduced to a visible standing in the church ? Where is this prohibition con- tained ? In what part of the New Testament ? It can- not be found. 460 SERMON XCIX. The silence of the New Testament is urged as a grand argument against infant baptism. But this silence so far from being against, is altogether in favour of infant bap- tism. If children of parents in visible covenant, were to have continued unto them, under the New Testament dis- pensation.the privilege of admission to a visible standing in God's chnrch and covenant, which they had enjoyed from the time of Abraham, there was no necessity that a single word should be said about it. For the initiating seal or baptism would of course be applied to them as circum- cision had formerly been. But if on the other hand, chil- dren who had long onjoyed the right to have the seal of God's covenant applied to them, were on the introduction of the New Testament dispensation to be deprived of this right, then there would have been great need, and it was of high importance that this should have been clearly and explicitly made known, and left on record, by the great Head of the church, in his word. And we cannot reason- ably suppose it would have been omitted. And since the New Testament has no where said a word, prohibiting the initiating seal of the covenant to infants, the natural, just, and necessary conclusion is, that their right has not been taken away, but that they still retain it, and there- fore ought to be baptized. Will it be objected that the command was, repent^ be- lievei and be baptized^ and since infants are incapable of these exercises, that therefore this amounts to a prohibi- tion ? This is a very popular objection against infant bap- tism ; but it is more specious than solid. Let us give the objection its full force, and if it proves any thing, it will prove too much, and will inevitably lead to a consequence which the objector dares not admit. We find every where in the New Testament, repentance and faith held up as essential to salvation. " Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish ;" Luk. xiii. 3. " He that believeth not shall be damned ;" Mark xvi. 16. On the principle of the objector, as infants are incapable of exercising repen- tance and faith, they must be incapable of salvation. This dreadful consequence follows by the sime reasoning, by w hich he proves that infants should not be baptized. The Scriptures say repent believe, and be baptized, infants cannot repent and believe, therefore conclude our op- ponents, they cannot be baptized, The same course of INFANT BAPTISM. 4(J1 reasoning will exclude all infants from salvation. The Scriptures say repent, believe, and be saved, infants can- not repent and believe, therefore they cannot be saved. If the reasoning be good in the one case, it is good in the other. Yea the conclusion is much more legitimate from the premises in the latter case than the former; because the Scriptures expressly declare that without faith and re- pentance there can be no salvation ; but they no where say that those who have not faith and repentance should not be baptized. The fact is that in both these cases, adults are meant. When the Scriptures tell us that faith and repentance are necessary to salvation, they mean in those capable of exercising them, viz. adults. Vnd they mean tlie same when they speak of faith and repentance as qualifications tor baptism. And it is readily conceded that unbaptized adults have no right to baptism, but up- on a credible profession of faith and repentance. That adults to whom the apostles spake, were coqimanded to repent, believe, and be baptized, therefore argues nothing against infant baptism, or if it does prove any thing, inevi- tably proves too much. For the argument militates equal- ly against the salvation of infants as against their bap- tism. We confidently assert it again, that the New Testa- ment, has no where taken away the right of infants to the initiating seal of God's gracious covenant. They once were judged fit subjects of the seal of the righteousness oi taith, and had a right to have it put upon them ; and there- fore they still retain it, and coiisequently are to be bap- tized. If children are now forbidden, let such prohibi*^ tion be produced, but until it is produced, we will rejoice in calling God, as his people of old did, our God and the. God of our seed. Here we might with safety rest the cause of infant bap- tism ; but we have additional evidence ot the truth of the doctrine. The New Testament not only does not say one word forbidding infant baptism ; but on the contrary it gives us much postive evidence in its favour. If the New- Testament had been entirely silent^ the just conclusion as bas been shown would be that infants retained their right to the initiating seal ; but this conclusion is strengthened by what is said in the New Testament. From the whole of the New Testament, it is evident 462 SERMON XCIX. the privileges of the church have been enlarged. Was it a privilege of the Old Testament church that children were admitted to the seal of God's gracious covenant ? The saints of those ages esteemed it an inestimable pri- vileo^e ; and the Apostle testified that it was a great pri- vileo^e, profiting much every wsy. And can it be possible that under the New Testament dispensation, in which pri- vileges have been professedly enlarged, such an important one has been taken away ? Besides what reason can be given why the privilege should be taken away ? Children have now as much need of an interest in the blessings of God's covenant, as they had of old ; and they are as ca- pable now of receiving baptism as they once were of re- ceiving circumcision. Ihese considerations afford, at least presumptive evidence, that God intended that the initiating seal under the New Testament should still be applied to infants. The question has been asked what does the child know about baptism, and what benefit can it receive from a transaction of which it is entirely ignorant ? In reply it may be asked, what did the Jewish child know about circumcision .f* No more than the child now knows about baptism, and yet by the express command of God it was circumcised ; and this circumcision which the child received, was a seal of the righteousness of faith, and baptism is no more. And this circumcision, of which the child was entirely ignorant, profited much every way; and thefore the ignorance of the child respecting its bap- tism, at the time of receiving it, can form no argument a- gaiiist the propriety of administering it. It has been shown, that if the New Testament were en- tirely silent, it would be an invincible argument in favour of infant baptism. But it is not silent, it affords positive evidence in our favour. Our Saviour said," Suffer little childrenandforbid them not to come unto me ; for of such is the kingdom of heav- en ;" Mat. xix. 14. By the kingdom of heaven we must un- derstand, either the visible church of Christ in this world or the kingdom of glory above. Understood in either sense, the passage affords an argument in favour of the baptism of infants. For if they are fit members of the church on earth, undoublly they have a right to the initi- ati!!g seal, or baptism. And if they are fit to be members ot the church of the first-born in heaven,undoubtedly they are tit to be members of the church on earth. INFANT BAPTISM. *^ 463 Again Peter, Acts ii. 38, 39 ; taught that the privilege of children to be admitted to a visible standing in the church was not taken away, but continued under the New Tes- tament. And he urged the continuance of this privilege as a reason why the Jews should be baptized. The Jews alarmed under his preaching, on the day of Pentecost as- ked what they should do ? '' Peter said unto them, repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ,for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the promise is unto you, and to your children.'''' The Jews were very jealous of the privileges which they had enjoyed under the Old Testament; and as appears from many passages of the New Testament, they were very much attached to circumcision, by which their children were introduced to a visible standing in the church and covenant of grace. Peter urged them to em- brace the gospel, and receive the new seal of the cov- enant, assuring them that under the new dispensation, the promise should embrace their children as well as them- selves, as it had done under the old. Again, an argument in further confirmation of the right of infants to baptism, may be drawn from 1 Cor. 7. 14; " For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife* and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband ;else were your children unclean ; but now are they holy.'''' By holy here, must be meant, not an internal but a federal hohness, or a relation to the covenant, in virtue of the standing of the believing parent. And if it signifies their relation to the covenant they must have a right to the ini- tiating seal, or baptism. Again, we have several examples in the New Testa- ment, of household baptisms. Lydia and her household, the jailer and all that were his, and the household of Ste- phanas, were baptized. It is true, there is no absolute certainty, that there were children in these families ; hut it is highly probable there were in some, if not in all of them. It is certainly fir more probable there wore, tisan that there were not. And a minister in the present day would certainly be warranted, hy the exam[)le of the A- postle, in case an nnbaptized head of a fnmiiy should give him evidence of fiith in Christ, and retjuest baptism, to baptize him. and with him his household, even though there siiould be inlants in that household. For Paul 464 SERMON XCIX. baptized all the family when the head of it believed, with-- out telling us of what ages the family were composed. — And why may not we do the same ? Yea following the ex- ample of the apostle are we not bound to do the same ? Again, in addition to all the evidence which has been adduced in favour of infant baptism, we have the testimo- ny of the history of the church, that this was the constant practice, without dispute, for many hundred years. Per- mit me to quote some of the testimonies of the primitive fathers on this subject. In the writings of Justin Martyr who lived about the middle of the second century, we find the following passage, " We have not received the carnal circumcision, but the spiritual, by baptism ; and all are in hke manner bound to receive it, as formerly circumcision." In this passage he evidently supposed baptism to have come in the room of circumcision, and that therefore it ought to be administered to the same subjects. Origen who lived about one hundred years af- ter the death of the apostles, declared the baptism of in- fants to have been the constant practice of the church.-— In one of his homilies endeavouring to prove the doctrine of original sin, he used their baptism as an argument. — "•Baptism (said he) is given to infants for the remission of sins; but wherefore by the use of the church, are they baptized, if they have no need of remission? Are not in- fants baptized, because that by the sacrament of baptism, the pollution of their first birth may be taken away." — Again, he said, " for this cause the church received a tra- dition from the apostles to give baptism also to infants."* Observe here, there appears in this early age to have been no dispute about the right of infants to baptism ; the prin- ciple is assumed as universally acknowledged, and ap- plied to prove another doctrine. About fifty years after tiiis, in the third century, a question was proposed by one Fidus, whctiiei' baptism ought to be administered, ac- cording to the law of circumcision, on the eighth day ?*' Cyprian of Carthage, convened a council of sixty clergy-^ nici), who unanimously decided that there was no neces- sity to delay baptism until the eighth day, but that it might, bo performed sooner. Here again, observe, no doubt wa& expressed concerning the right of infants to baptism: but the only question was, whether baptism ought to be ad- ministered on the same day as circumcision had formerly INFANT BAPTISM. 465 been. Ambrose another of the primitive fatliers declared that the " baptism of infants was the practice of the apos- tles and of the primitive church until his time." In the Writings of Gregory Nazianzen is found this sentence, " Baptism, in like manner as circumcision, may be per- formed on the eighth day ; but shouhl not be neglected longer than the second or third year." The learned and pious Augustine of the fifth century, in his writings against the Donatists said, " If any ask me for the divine authori- ty of infant baptism, though it is that which the whole church uses, and which was not instituted by a council, but was always in use, he is answered, it is believed to be none other than that which was delivered by the a- postles. Nevertheless we may justly estimate how much infant baptism profits from the circumcision which God's ancient people received." The last iristance which I shall mention is from the same Augustine in his contro- versy with Pelagius who denied the doctrine of original sin, and taught that infants were born free of corruption. Au- gustine opposed this error of Pelagius, and used the bap- tism of infants, as an argument to refute it. " Infants (said he) are by all christians acknowledged to need baptism, which must be for original sin, seeing that they can have no other." And in another place, " Wherefore are they washed with thelaver ofregeneration,if they have no pol- lution?" Though Pelagius felt the weight of this argument, and was much confounded with it, yet he did not dare to suggest a doubt about the right of infants to baptism. But when some ciiarged him with a denial of infant baptism, as a consequence of his doctrine, he denied the charge, and answered, " Men calumniate me with a denial of in- fant baptism," and added, "I have never heard infant bap- tism denied by the worst heretics." Pelagius was a scho- lar and a great traveller. He had come from Britain, and had travelled to Rome, Africa, Egypt, and Jerusalem, and yet he had never heard any one deny infant baptism ; and he himself dared not deny it though it operated so much against his favorite doctrine. These testimonies teach that the baptismof infants was universally held by the church from directly after the a- postles' days,for many hundred years, and how can we ac- coin\t for this, except we admit, that the primitive church received it from the apostles ? VOL. n. /)9 466 SERMON XCIX. Permit me before I close, to mention one other consid- en»tion. Baptism is essential to a visible standiig in the church of Christ on earth. By far the greater part of those Avho profess to belong to the church of Christ have received baptism In their infancy. If this be no baptism, of course, they do not belong to the visible church of Christ. And accordingly we find, that the m(,st of those who deny infant baptism, will not suffer them, however ex- emplary their lives may be, to commune with them. I ask is it probable that God would show his approbation,as hehas done, of so many who have been baptized in infancy, if they were aliens from the commonwealth of the christian Israel, and visible strangers from the covenants ot pro- mise ? Is it probable that such men as Luther, and Me- lancthon, and Zuinglius, and Calvin, who put tlieir lives in their hands, and were the honored instruments of the glorious reformation from Popery, were no ministers of Christ.'^ And did not even belong to his visible church on earth .^ WereCranmer, and Hooper, and Ridley, and La- timer, and Rogers, and a great maay others, who preach- ed the gospel "with success, and became martyrs, in (he cause of Christ — were these men no ministers ofChrist.'* Nor even members of his visible church ? Was White- firid,vvhom the Lord so signally blessed, and who probably has more seals of his ministry, and more crowns of re- joicmg in heaven than any man since the days of the a- postles — was he no minister of Christ ? Nor even a mem- ber of his visible church .'^ Was the same the case with Owen, and Baxter, and Flavel, and Watts and Doddridge, and Newton, and Edwards and Dickinson, and Davies, and the Tennents, and thousands of others who shone as lights in the world, who walked humbly with God, adorn- ii'g the religion of Jesus, who enjoyed the presence of God, and whose labours, the Lord blessed to the conver- sion and edification of an almost innumerable multitude ? It cannot be, God would not have so signally and exten- sively blessed men, and societies holding and practising inlant baptism, if they were wrong, and especially on an article essentially affecting the visibility of his church on earth. I conclude this discourse with summing up the reason- ing which has been used in this and the former discourse, on the subject of infant baptism. The covenant made INFANT BAPTIS.:\I. 467 vvith Abraham was the covenant of grace. This was pro- ved hy tlie comments of the New Testament upon the ar- ticles of that covenant, which show that tfie promise of a nu.iierous seed related to behevers in Christ of every na- tion; that the gospel was preached and Christ promised in that covenaiit; thatuod therein promised to be the ever- lasling God of those who kept it; that Christ and salvation were the substance of it ; that believers under the New Testament are heirs of the promises made in that cove- nant ; that it was contirm'^d of God in Christ ; and that it contained the righteousness of fiith. Circumcision was the sign and seal of this covenant. This sign and seal vvas, hy divine appointment, put upon infants only eight days old ; and therelbre infants once had a right to the initia- ting seal of the covenant of grace, and had a visible stand- ing in this covenant. Circumcision was abolished when Christ came, and iiaptism was instituted in its room, and therefore should be applied to the same subjects, unless God has taken away t!ie right which he once gave. The New Testament gives us no evidence that God has taken away this right from infants, and therefore it still contin- ues. Yea the New Testament, not only gives us no ev- idence that God has taken away the right of infants to be admitted to a visible standing in his church, but it con- tains positive evidence that he has continued this right. — Ciirist said •' Suffer little children and forbid them not to come unto me : for of such is the kingdom of heaven." Peter urged as a reason why the Jews should be baptized, *• The promise is unto you, and to your children." Paul declared the infants of believers to be holy ; and whole households were baptized. Infant baptism was practised witliout dispute throughout the christian church for many centuries after the apostles' days. And God has most sia;nally blessed those who have practised infant baptism, and docs still bless them. From these arguments we con- fidently draw the conclusion that children ought to be baptized. And in this faith, supported by such arguments, we will with joy bring our children to the Lord, put his seal upon them, devote them to him, and humbly plead the promise, that he will be the God of our seed as well as our God. — Amen. SERMON C. QUALIFICATIONS FOR BAPTISM. ACTS II. 38, 39. " Then Peter said unto them, repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the pro- mise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are (far of, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.'''' Agreeably to the promise of our divine Lord, the Holy Ghost was poured out upon his apostles, a few days after his ascension. This took place on the day of Pentecost, in the city of Jerusalem, where the apostles were assem- bled, waiting for the fulfilment of their Lord's promise.- " Suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a rush- ing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they ■were sitting. And there appeared unto them cloven tongues, like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utter- ance ;" Acts ii. 2, 3, 4. The news of what had taken place, being noised a- broad througli Jerusalem, drew together a great multitude of Jews, who were at this time in Jerusalem, attending the feast from the different nations, wliither they had been dis- persed. When they heard the apostles address them each in his own language, some were amazed, and others mocking said, these men are full of new wine ;" vers. 13. This charge, Peter, standing up with the rest of the apos- tles, denied, and told them "that what they saw and heard, was the fulfilment of a prophecy long before delivered by the prophet Joel. He then spake to them of Christ, ■wlio had been approved of God among them, by the mir- acles which he wrought; charged them with his murder; declared that God had raised him from the dead, of which they were witnesses ; and had exalted him to his right QUALIFICATIONS FOR BAPTISM. 469 hand ; and that it was through his power that what they saw and heard had taken place. When they heard this discourse, they were pricked in their hearts, and anxious- ly asked what they should do ? " Peter (in th<^ words of our text) said unto them, repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off., even as many as the Lord our God shall call." The christian dispensation of the covenant of grace had now taken the place of the Jewish. Baptism had been appointed to be in the room of circumcision, the ordi- nance of admission into a visible standing in the cluirch. Visible repentance was to be necessary to admit adults to this ordinance. Children, as formerly, were to have a visible standing in the church, and therefore were to be baptized; for the promise was unto them as well as to their parents. But repentance in the parents being ng short of saving faith. So also Lydia before she was briplized, gave evidence of conversion ; for the Lord had "opened her heart, that siie attended unto the tljings which were spoken of Paul," and immediately after her bi piism,. she said, "if ye have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come into my house and abide there. And she constrained us ;" Acts xvi. 14, 15. So also the jailer was baptized on the same ground ; for he was deeply con- victed of his sins ; and having anxiously enquired what he should do to be saved, was told to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and he should be saved; and having heard the word of the Lord preached to him, he was baptized, and rejoiced believing in God ; Acts xvi. From all these passages it is evident, that credible evi- dences of conversion, repentance, and faith, or true reli- gion, are requisite to entitle unbaptized adults to be ad- mitted to the ordinance of baptism. And this is the doc- trine of our Catechism. '"'Baptism is not to be administered to anij that are out of the visible churchy till they profess their faith in Christ and obedience to him.'''' Herein we agree with those Avho deny the propriety of infant baptism. We hold with them the necessity of a credible profession of true repent- ance, faith, and obedience, to give an adult a right to be baptized ? CtUALIFICATIONS FOR BAPTISM. 471 II. We proceed to point out the requisite qualifications for vifunt bvpium. These quahfications must be in the parent or offerer. Infants, unquestionably, have not the right nierely because they are infants. The advocates for the greatest laxness in administering baptism to infants will not contend for this. They will all allow that some- thing else is requisite to give a right to infants, than mere- ly that they are infants. They must be the children of parents, or under the care of guardians, or masters, of a certain description. Under the Jewish dispensation, it was necessary that persons themselves should be circum- cised, to have a right to put the seal of the covenant upon their children. The apostles evidently acted upon the same principle in the administration of baptism. Both Lydia and the jailer were first baptized themselves, and received into the christian church, before the ordi- nance was administered to their households. And those who in the present day are most lax in administering bap- tism to infants, will at least require, that the offerer should be a baptized person. These two things then are evident, and must be admitted, that all infants indiscriminately are not to be baptized, and that the qualifications are not in the infant but in the offerer. What then are the requisite qualifications to entitle a person to offer a child in baptism } I answer that the offerer ought to give credible eviden- ces that he is truly pious, or a child of God. The cor- rectness of this answer, I would now endeavour to estab- lish } 1. From the qualifications requisite to dedicate a child aright in circumcision, under tlie Old Testament dispen- sation. It was shown in a former discourse that the cov- enant made with Abraham was the covenant of grace, and that circumcision was a seal of this covenant, and there- fore a seal of the covenant of sracc. The child in cir- cumcision was passive. The acting person was the pa- rent or offerer. As has been shown the cliild's right was not in itself, but derived from the relation of the parent or olfcrer to the covenant. The parent therefore by offering his child, evidently professed to be in the covenant, in vir- tue of which he claimed a right for his ciiild ; aiid,if in tfiej| covenant, to be under. obligations to keep it. Circumcis- ion was a seal of the righteousness of faith, therefore w hea 472 SERMON C. he applied this seal to his child, he acknowledged his own circumrision, and virtually professed that faith, which in- terests the soul in a righteousness througlj which justifica- tion is obtained. Hence it appears that parents in the Old i estament church, when they offered a child in cir- cumcision, did acknowledge their own circumcision, and profess to be in the covenant of which circumcision was the seal, and therefore in the covenant of grace; or in other words they did profess true religion, and their ol li- gation to perform all the duties ofGod's people. And if they professed what they did not possess, they acted hy- pocritically ; and if they did not keep the covenant ac- cording to the obhgations under which they impliedly and voluntarily brought themselves, they were guilty of lying unto God. It is true, many who had no real religion circumcised their children ; and in some ages of the church, many who were very wicked did it ; for it is not denied, that the Israelites in general, whatever their character was, cir- cumcised their children. But the practice of the Jewish church, was no evidence that it was right according to the divine institution to circumcise their children with such tempers, and while living as they did, any more than the practice of thousands in the christian church of coming even to the Lord's table, whi-le destitute of heart religion and grossly flagitious in their lives, proves that it is right for such persons to come to this holy ordinance. It is true God required all the Israelites to circumcise their children; but at the same time he required them to do it with proper tempers, and to keep the covenant ; and it was at their peril if they did not. If we look through the Old Testament we shall find a- bundant proof that the Lord required of the Jews, real heart religion ; that they were bound, as the visible cove- nant people of God, by circumcision to have and to exer- cise this religion ; and that the promises were made to them on tliis condition. Of Abraham God required. ''Y^'^lk before me, and be thou perfect; Gen. xvii. 1, At .Sinai tiie Lord said unto the Israelites, " If ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be gi peculiar treasure unto me above all people.'' And the people did engage thus to act; for they replied, "All iIkH the Lord hath -noken we will do;"' Rxod. xix. 5. «. Qualifications for baptism. 473 Again we find enjoined upon them, "Ye shall be holy : l^or I the Lord your God am holy ;" Lev. xix. 2. *' Sanc- tify yourselves, and be ye holy, for I am the Lord your God ;" Lev. xx. 7. "And now Israel, what doth the Lord thy God require of thee, but to fear the Lord thy God, to walk in all his ways, and to love him, and to serve the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul, to keep the commarjdments of the Lord, and his statutes which I command thee this day for thy good ;" Deut. x. 12, 13. " And it shall come to pass, if you shall hearken diligently unto my commandments, to love the Lord your God, and to serve him with all your heart, and with all your soul ; that I will give you the rain of your land in his due season, the tirst rain and the latter rain, that thou mayest gather in thy corn, and thy wine, and thine oil. If ye shall diligently keep all these commandments ; then will the Lord drive out all these nations from before you ;" Deut. xi. 13, 14,22, 23. From these texts and a great many others, it is evident that God required real heart religion of the Jews; that they did not keep the covenant, of which their circumcision was the seal, without it; and and that they were not, without it, entitled even to tem- poral blessings. Further, we find the Lord charged this people with hypocrisy, for professedly owning his covenant, when their hearts were not right with him. Thus we read ; "They did Hatter him with their mouth, and they lied un- to him with their tongues. For their heart was not right with him, neither were they stedfast in his covenant;" Ps. Lxxviii. 36, 37. In the first chapter of Isaiah the Lord blamed this people for attending to external ordinances, in a formal and hypocritical manner. " To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me .'* saith the Lord : I am full of the burnt-offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts, and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he-goats. When ye come to appear before me, who hath required this at your hand to tread my courts ? Bring no more vain oblations : incense is an abomination unto me, the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity even the solemn meeting. Your new moons and your ap- pointed feasts my soul hatelh : they are a trouble unto me, I am weary to bear them." Tins severe reproof wifl VOL. 11. 60 474 SERMON C. apply equally to circumcision with other external ordi- naiices. Again, Ps. l. 16, we read, "Unto the wicked God saith, W hat hast thou to do to declare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth ?" IN ow every time a Jew circumcised a child, he declared God's statutes, and took his covenant in his mouth ; but in this text we are taught, if he was wicked, he had no right to do this. From the preceding texts, the following things appear. God required of the Jews, real heart rehgion ; they professed this, and bound themselves to live accord- ingly, when they circumcised their children ; when they owtied the covenant, by circumcising their children, while destitute of heart religion, the Lord charged them with hypocrisy, and lying unto him ; that such offerings were iniquity, hateful to his soul and a trouble to him ; and that the wicked had nothing to do with his covenant, and con- sequently with circumcision the seal of it. And in addition to all this, it is certain, that for not hav^- ing what they professed to have when they circumcised their children, and not keeping the covenant of which circumcision was the seal, the Lord at different times very severely punished them. For their unbelief the genera- tion w hich came out of Egypt were not permitted to enter Canaan. INotwithstanditig they were circumcised, they could not enter in, because of unbelief. For their wick- edness in breaking the covenant of God, they were fre- quently harassed by their enemies. For this they were sent into a seventy years captivity in Babylon. And for this notwithstanding their circumcision, they were finally cut off from the church of God, and the uncircumcised Gentiles graffed in. And they were not only cut off from the church; but their city and temple were destroyed, and they themselves were dispersed through the world, and continue to this day, a standing monument of God's wrath against those who take his covenant upon them, while their hearts are far from him. Hence it appears, that although the Jews did circum- cise their children, with unholy hearts, and while their lives were openly wicked, they acted, in so doing, con- trary to the divine command ; and that God disapproved, of such conduct, and did severely punish them for it. The circumcision of his child by a Jew, was not an ac- ceptable act in the sight of God» unless he did it in the exercise of piety of heart. QUALIFICATIONS FOR BAPTISM. 475 Here a question may arise. Although it was a wicked act ill the sight of God for a Jew to circumcise his child without piety of heart, this was between God and himself; but he being a circumcised person, had the church any right to refuse him admission to this privilege for his child, whatever his life might have been? I answer, yes. And they not only had a right, but it was their duty to refuse him in certain cases. It was the duty of those who were appointed to instruct the people, to teach them the nature of God's ordinances, with what tempers they were to approach them, the obli- gations under which they laid themselves, and the sin of coming with wrong tempers, and not fulfilling their obli- gations ; and tliey ought solemnly to have warned them agninst such an improper approach to circumcision. This most probably would have prevented many abuses of this ordinance. Besides, the Lord established discipline in the Jewish church. They were a great many times directed to cut ©^from the congregation of Israel or the Jewish church, certain characters. The least which could be meant by this cutting off was, an exclusion from the Jewish church. And therefore when they were cut oflf^ they were consid- ered and treated as Heathen, and of course could not be admitted to the sealing ordinances of God's covenant, and consequently had no more right to have their children circumcised than the Heathen. Let us then attend to Mio directions of God on this subject. Ex. xii. 15, 19, the Lord gave commandment to cut off from the congregation of Israel the soul, that during the feast of unleavened bread, should cat any thing leavened. Ex. xxx. 33, 38, they were commanded to cut off from his people the man who should make any oil like the holy anointing oil or put any of it upon a stranger. Lev. vii. they were forbidden to rat of the peace-offerings while ceremonially unclean, or to eat the fat or blood under pain of being cut off from Israel. Lev. xviii. ; the Lord, after forbidding a number of sins, added vers. 29, "Whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that commit them shall be cut off from among their people." Num. ix. 13, we learn that the man who neglected to keep the passover was to be cut off from his people. And Num. xv. 30, we read, " The soul that doeth ought presumptuously, the 476 SERMON C. same reproacheth the Lord ; and that soul shall be cut off from among his people." Hence it appears that the Jews were liable to be cut off for certain things ; and if we look at these things we shall find that they embraced every thing which proved in the sight of the church, that a man was destitute of piety. We therefore conclude, that if the Jewish church had done its duty, none visibly wicked would have been retained within its pale ; and consequently, according to the constitution of the Jewish church, none but the visibly pious ought to have been ad- mitted to circumcision for their children, and admitting others, as it is true they did, was in violation of the divine institution. From all that has been said, I now draw the conclusion, that in the Jewish church, when a person offered a child in circumcision, he professed real religion, that the offer- ing was not acceptable to God without real piety ; and that visible piety ought to have been a requisite qualifica- tion, in the sight of the church, according to the divine in- stitution. And since the christian church is founded upon the Jewish, and is but a continuation of the same church, imder a different dispensation ; and since baptism has come in the room of circumcision, we conclude that a per- son when he offers his child in baptism does covenant with God and profess true religion ; that if he professes what he has not, he acts hypocritically ; that to offer his child acceptably iii the sight of God, he must do it in the exercise of real piety ; and that the requisite qualifica- tions in the sight of the church, ought to be visible eviden- ces of real piety. I have been the more particular in examining the qual- ifications for circumcision in the Jewish church, because many may be ready to suppose, that because we prove infant baptism from infant circumcision, that therefore all baptized parents have a right to offer their children, be- cause they suppose that all circumcised parents had this right. But we have seen from examining the divine institution on this subject that they had not. I believe the advocates for laxness in administering baptism will gain nothing in support of their sentiments, by examining the quulificntioiis for circumcision. I am wiUing to extend baptism, not as far as the Jews did extend circumcision, in QUALIFICATIONS FOR BAPTISM. 477 their practice, but as far as they were authorized by the divine institution to extend it. I must here pause, and God willing, shall resume and finish the subject in another discourse. SERMON CI. QUALIFICATIONS FOR BAPTISM. ACTS II. 38, 39. " Then Peter said unto them^ repent^ and he baptized everij cue of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the pro- mise is unto you,, and to your children^ and to all that are afaf Q^, eyeJi as many as the Lo7'd our God shall calV From the reasoning in the last sermon the conclusion was drawn, that under the Old Testament dispensation, visible piety in the parent, was a requisite qualification, when the church did its duty, to give him a ria;ht in the sight of the church to offer his child in circumcision. And hence the inference was drawn, that since baptism h:ife' come in the room of circumcision, when a person offers a child in baptism, he covenants with God, and professes true religion, and if he professes what he has not, he acts hypocritically ; that to ofier his child acceptably in the siglit of God, he must do it in the exercise of real piety ; and that tbe requisite qualifications in the sight of tiie church ought to be visible evidences of real piety. We now proceed to offer other argume?its in support of die same position, that a person to have a right to oflf'r his child in baptism, ought to give credible evidences of real piety. 2. As far as we have any supposed examples in Scrip- ture, of infant baptism, they are in favour of this sentiment. The households of Lydia and the jailer wore iiapti- zed. In both these cases the heads of the families, wlio 47ti , SERMON Li. we suppose were the offerers, gave evidences oi'true relig- ion; and the famihes were baptized on this ground, that the heads had embraced true rehgion, and were really pi- ous. The Lord opened the heart of Lydia, that she at- tended unto the things which were spoken of Paul, and then she was baptized and her household. And the jail- er was convicted, anxiously enquired what he should do ; was told to believe and he should be saved, and then was baptized, he and all his straightway, and rejoiced, believ- ing in God. 3. The same may be argued from the nature of baptism. Circumcision was a token of the A brahamic co venant,which, as has been shown, was the covenant of grace. And it was a seal of the righteousness of faith. Baptism has come in its room, and is therefore a sign and seal of the covenant of grace. It has been shown that the child's right is in virtue of the parent's standing in the covenant. '1 he most lax will at least plead as the reason why they claim baptism for their children, that they themselves have been baptized, and are therefore, visibly, in the cov- enant. They therefore do acknowledge their own bap- tism and standing in the covenant, when they present their children for baptism. And by acknowledging their own baptism and standing in the covenant, they do profess to be the Lord's, and to be obligated to fulfil all that is re- quired of those who are in the covenant of grace. And therefore they undoubtedly ought to have true religion, which they profess to have ; or they act hypocritically, and are guilty of what the Scriptures call lying unto God. And here will apply that solemn text, Ps. l. 16, 17 ; " Unto the wicked God saith, what hast thou to do to de- clare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my cove- nant in thy mouth .'^ Seeing thou hatest instruction, and castest my words behind thee." To admit to sealing or- dinances, the church ought to require visible evidences of what God really requires. For the visible church ought to be, as faras is consistent with human fallibility, what the in- visible church really is. But there can reasonably be no question that God requires real piety, to render the act acceptable in his sight ; and therefore the church ought to require visible evidences of real piety. Further, if the parent, as has been shown, does really, w hen he of- Ots his child, mako the same covenant with God, as when QUALIFICATIONS FOR BAPTISM. 479 an adult offers himself in baptism, what reason can be given why he should not have the same qualifications ? But it has been fully shown that unbaptized persons have no right to baptism for themselves, unless they give evidences of true religion. And if the covenant made is the same, why admit persons to make a covenant of true religion, by oilering their children, without evidences of piety, when we would not admit them without such evidences,- to make the very same covenant, by offering themselves in baptism. Surely if the covenant is the same, the natural inlierence is, that the same qualifications should be requi« red. 4. The same may be argued from this consideration, that when a person offers a child in baptism he dedicates it unto God. But most assuredly a heart-searching God looks for sincerity of heart, and no dedication can be ac- ceptable to him, where it is not done with sincerity of heart. But the carnal mind is enmity against God ;" Rom. viii. 7. And how is it possible for a person with such a mind to make an acceptable dedication ? He can- not. It is contrary to the nature of things, and God has told us in his word, "• The sacrifice of the wicked is an abomination to the Lord ;" Prov. xv. H. Further a per- son destitute of religion, when he offers his child in bap- tism, undoubtedly does not exercise a scriptural faith ; but the Scriptures expressly teach, " Without faith it is impos- sible to please God ;" Heb. xi. 6, And''' Whatsoever is not of faith is sin ;" Rom. xiv. 23. The person there- fore who pretends to offer a child, while destitute of faith, which is an essential branch of true piety, cannot please God by such an offering, but on the contrary, sins against him. And most assuredly it cannot be that God authori- zes such a person to offer his child; or that the church has a right to admit him, when he gives no evidence that he has that faith without which it is impossible tt> please God. 5. Another argument in favour of the truth of our po- sition may be drawn from this consideration; one great reason why God has appointed that the scjal of the cove- nant should be put upon infants, evidently vvas, to secure their religious education. \V lien a child is baptized, the church becomes responsible for its religious education, and is bound to attend with paternal solicitude to it? 480 SERMON CI. spjrkial interests. But the church when it receives a child, must commit it back again to its parents to be edu- cated by them. It therefore concerns the church, when it admits :i child into its pale, to have a security that tiie o^ ferer will train up this child for God ; otherwise one great end of baptism, the religious education of the child v»ill be defeated, and the church will be guilty of receivinginto its. bosom, a child for (?od, and then suffering it to be train- ed up for the service of Satan. This being the case the church ought to be careful to receive no children but those for whose rehgious education they have good security. — And the only sufficient security they can have is the visibly religious character of the parent. Thus my hearers I have presented before you some ar- guments to prove that persons ought to have true religion, to offer their children in baptism acceptably in the sight of God ; and to give them a right in the sight of the church, they ought to appear to be what God requires they should be, truly pious. Let us briefly review the arguments which have beerx used. Under the Old Testament dispensation, visible re- ligion was requisite according to the divine institution, to entitle a person in the sight of the church to offer his child in circumcision, and baptism has come in the room of circumcision. They whose households were baptized^ as recorded in the New Testament, gave evidences of pi^ ety. Baptism is a seal of the covenant of grace, and they who come to this ordinance, for their children as well as themselves, profess to be in the covenant and therefore to have true religion. OfTering a child in baptism is a dedica- tion of it unto Cod, which, without true religion, a man can- not really or acceptably make. And one great end of bap- tism is to secure the religious education of the child, tor which the church has no security unless the parent has visible religion. From all these arguments we draw the conclusion, that visible piety is a requisite qualification, to entitle a persoii in the sight of the church, to offer his child in baptism. And this has been the opinion of the church generally with but few^ exceptions. Ii is as far as I am capable of understanding them, the doctrine of all the Confessions of r^aith, w hich I have been able to examine. And I believe aptism, that if he does not possess it, he acts hypocritically ; and that when he refuses to profess it, or if he is willing to profess when his lile contradicts such profession, he ought to be refused admission to baptism for his child. We therefore ngain draw the conclusion that visible piety is requisite to entitle a person to a right in the sight of the chun h to offer his child in baptism. This appears to be the doctrine of the Scriptures, both of the Old and INew Testaments ; atid this is the doctrine of the Confes- sions of Faith of most, if not all the Relbrmed churches ; and this is the doctrine contained in the standards of the churcii to which we profess to belong. And here it may be important to answer the following query, which perhaps has arisen in the minds of some. Sfeingthata person by baptism has become a member of the visible church, although, destitute of piety, he may hiive no right in the sight of God to offer his child, and although he gives the church no evidence of visible piety, y<'l oil what ground, or in what way, can he be kept back irorn baptism for his child ? I answer, let him I e serious- ly and solemidy tohf the nature of baptism, the protession which he is about to make, and the solemn obligations u;.d.'r which he is about to lay himself If this were p.uj)erly done, it would have a great effect in keeping back many iiup;oper persoiis. Further, I would answer, QUALIFICATIONS FOR BAPTISM. 4Su iftbe church has a right to keep back baptized persons from the Lord's Supper, for want of quahfications, which is almost universally acknowledged and done, then it has a right to keep them back irom baptism for their children, for want of qualifications. Besides, the church has un- doubtedly the right of discipline, and for conduct incon- sistent with membership, they may suspend or exclude from the church. I proceed now to make a practical improvement of this subject. 1, We infer from our subject, that the sacraments ought not to be divided. The person who is fit to come to the one is fit to come to the other. They are both seals of the same covenant. When an adult person receives baptism himself, he professes true religion. He makes a covenant with God, and binds himself to live to God as one of his people. He does the same when Jie offers his child. And he does no more when he comes to the Lord's Supper. How then does it happen that there are so many, who are willing to come to baptism for themselves and their children, and yet are unwilling to come^-to the Lord's Supper. It must arise from erroneous views of the nature of the ordinances. 1 do not say brethren, that you ought to come to the Lord's table before you bring your children to baptism; but I do say with confidence that you ought to have the same qualifications to otferyour children in baptism as to come to the Lord's table ; and that having given up yourselves to (iod in offering your children, }ou ought to embrace the first opportunity to come to the other sacrament. And since the practice of the Jewish church, in admitting every one, as they suppose, to circumcision for their children is so often brought as favorable to the sentiment of those, who wish to offer their children in baptism, "while they neglect the Lord's Supper, I would here re- mark, there was no separating the sacraments in the Jewish. The Lord's Supper is allowed to have come in the room of the passover. Now it is certain that the Jew who neglected to keep the passover was liable not only to be deprived of the right of coming to circumcision for his child, but also to be cut off from the church and all its privileges. Read Num. ix. 13 ; " But the man that is clean, and is not in a journey, and forbeareth to keep the 436 SERMON CI. passover, even the same soul shall be cut off from among his people : because he brought not the offering of the Lord in his appointed season, that man shall bear his sin." 2. Our subject solemnly reproves many, who have had their children baptized. All such have solemnly ac- knowledged their own baptism with all the consequent obligations. They have solemnly professed to be in cov- enant with God, and have bound themselves to live a life of real piety. All this is implied in the act of offering children in baptism. Did you sincerelij covenant with God when you had your children baptized.'* If not, you acted hypocritically, and mocked God. And was not this great wickedness. Let such be convinced of their guilt, be alarmed under a sense of it, and without delay seek the forgiveness and mercy of that God, against whom they have thus sinned. Did you suppose at the time you were sincere, but have you not kept your cove- nant engagements ? You are covenant-breakers, and have reason again to be convinced, and alarmed, and im- portunately to seek the forgiveness of God. And here let me remind all parents who have offered their children in baptism, of the solemn vows they have made with respect to them. Whether you have explicitly promised or not, the promises are imphed. But I suppose that most of you have made explicit promises, in the words, or the sub- stance, of the direction in our Confession of Faith. This has been the case with all whose children the speaker has baptized. Have you my hearers whether communi- cants or not .'* I ask you as in the presence of God who \vill soon be your judge — have you kept your engage- ments, which you have solemnly made to God, and his church } You promised to teach your children to read the word of God. Have you done this ? have you put the Bible into their hands "^ have you recommended this book to them.'* and do you frequently read it yourselves before them, that they may be led by your example } You pro- mised to instruct them in the principles of our holy reh- gion. Have you done, and are you still doing this ? or do you seldom or never speak to them of divine things ? or what is worse, do you teach them to neglect and de- spise such instruction } You promised to pray with and for your children. Have you done, and are you doing this flaily ^ or have you seldom or never offered up a prayer QUALIFICATIONS FOR BAPTISM. 48''7 for your children ? Have tliey never seen you collect that iamily which God has given you, and in the midst of them pray unto him ? You promised to set an example of piety and godliness before your children. Have you done, and are you daily doing this ? or is your example the reverse of this ? And you promised by all the means ofGod's appointment, to bring up your children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. Have you fulfilled this promise ? These means are many, such as instruction, example, restraint, correction, prayer, and attendance up- on the word and ordinances of God. Brethren, these ques- tions are addressed to your consciences. What does conscience say ? Have you not fulfilled your solemn vows ? Think of the day of account, when the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. And may the Lord give you deep conviction and repentance. 3. Finally, permit me to say a word to those who have not offered their children in baptism. fhey may perhaps be blessing themselves that they are clear of guilt in this matter. It is true, you are not guilty of breaking cove- nant engagements ; but still you are guilty of neglecting your duty. It is your duty to offer your children and to give up both yourselves and them unto God, and to do it in the exercise of real faith and repentance. Faith and repentance are immediate duties of every soul. And it is at the peril of the loss of your souls, if you do not re- pent and believe. And repenting and believing, it is your duty, immediately to give up yourselves, and your chil- dren, to God in a public covenant. So that you as well as those who are covenant-breakers, are in a dangerous state. " Repent" therefore " and be baptized, every one of you" who are unbaptized, "in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins." Let all who are baptized bring their children to the ordinance, in the exercise of faith, repentance, and holy obedience. And let all who offer themselves or their children, feel that they have cov- enanted to be the Lord's and his alone, and be careful to fulfil their covenant engagements. SERMON Clf. ADVAiNTAGES OF INFANT BAPTlbM. ROMANS III. 1, 2. " What advantage then hath the Jew ? or what profit is there of circumcision ? much every icay ; chiefly^ because that unto them were co7nmitted the oracles of God.''"' In the preceding chapter, the apostle had shown that without internal piety, tlie iew^ notwithstanding all his peculiar privileges, could not be saved ; and that the pious Gentile, though destitute of the external privileges of the Jew, would obtain salvation. The Jews boasted of their privileges ; and many of them, in the apostles days, trusted to them ; supposing, because they were the children of Abraham, had the law and ordinances of God, and had been, as a nation, the subjects of the divine favour, that therefore they were safe. And at the same time they supposed that the Gentiles, being destitute of such external marks of the divine favour, were rejected of God, and would not be accepted by him. This opinion the apostle refuted by the following rea- soning. '-Circumcision verily profiteth if thou keep the law, but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. Therefore if the uncircum- cision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his un- circumcision be counted for circumcision.'* And shall, not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost trans- gress the law? For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly : ncitiier is that circumcision which is outward in the ilesb : But he is a Jew who is one inwardly ; and circumcision is that of tlio heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter, whose praise is not of men but of God ;" Rom. ii. 25 — 29. From this reasoning the Apostle supposed an inference might be drawn against the Jevvish privileges. This ob- jection he stated, and answered in our te\t. As thousjh ADVANTAGES OP INFANT BAPTISM. 489 he had said, if this statement be correct, you may ask, " What advantage then hath the Jew? Or what profit is there of circiimrision ?" I answer, " Much every way ; chietiy, because that unto them were committed the ora- cles of God." Though circumcision could not save them in their sins, or by its own efficacy, yet it secured to them many and great advantages for obtaining salvation ; and especially it secured to them the advantage of having com- mitted to them the Holy Scriptures, which were able, through the blessing of God, to make them wise unto sal- vation. We have in a former discourse seen that baptism un- der the New Testament dispensation has come in th^ room of circumcision under the Old, and signifies the same things, and should be applied to the same subjects, and therefore to infants. We may therefore answer the ques- tion which is sometimes put, " What profit is there of" infant baptism ? in the same way as the question was an- swered in our text with regard to circumcision, "• Much every way ; chiefly because that unto them" are " com- mitted the oracles of God." The object of the ensuing discourse is to point out the advantages of infant baptism. Baptism cannot of itself confer any grace. It is not re- generation. It does not operate as a kind of spell or charm as many seem practically to suppose. We may say of it as the apostle in our context said of circumcision. '•Circumcision verily profiteth if thou keep the law, but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. i he chief benefit of haptism consists in the more favourable situation into which it brings the child to obtain the grace of God ; and will profit him, if these privileges are improved, and not otherwise. More particularly, 1. By baptism a child becomes interested in the promise of God, ••' / will be their God ;" Gen. xvii. 8. This was the great promise made to the circumcised in the Abraliamic covenant, as you will find. Gen. xvii. 7, 8. "And I will establisl) my covenant between me and tliee, and tS y seed after thee in tlieir generations for an everlasting cov- enant ; to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after ti.ee; and I will be their God." This promise was made to ttie circumcised ; and to be interested in it, it was necessary ^ OL-. rr. (i2 490 SERMON cir. tbat the males should be circumcised. For it is added ; "This is my covenant which ye shall keep between me and you, and thy seed after thee; every man-child among you shall be circumcised ;" vers. 10. "And my cove- nant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting cove- nant;" vers. 11. And it is further added, "Theuncir- cumc ised man-child, wliose flesh of his foreskin is not cin umiised, that soul shall be cut off from his people: he liath broken my covenant;" vers. 14. Under the New Testament dispensation, baptism which has come in the room of circumcision, introduces the child to an interest in the same promise. For from the »New Testament we learn, that Abraham is " the father of all them tliat believe ; Rom. iv. 11 ; that the blessing of Abraham has come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ ;" Gal. iii. 14 ; that they who are "Christ's are A- braham's seed, and heirs according to the promise;" Gal. iii. 29 ; and that the promise is still to God's covenant people, and to their children ; Acts ii. 39. Hence we in- fer that the promise, "I will be their God," is still in force. And reasoning from circumcision to baptism, children to be interested in this promise, must have the token of the covenant, which is now baptism, put upon them. They who have not this sign of the covenant upon them, can be no more interested in the promises of the cove- nant, than was the uncircumcised man-child of old, who was expressly called a breaker of the covenant of God. Since therefore this promise is in full force, and baptism introduces to an interest in it ; it will be important in pointing out the advantages of baptism to inquire into the import of this promise made to the baptized, " I will be their God." 'I'his promise under the Old Testament was a very great one, and imported very great blessings. It certainly, however, did not imply that every circum- cised child should be made a partaker of the saving grace of God. For there undoubtedly were many of the cir- cumcised Jews, who lived and died strangers to a circum- cision of heart, or vital piety. But the least that it im- ported was, that God would keep up his church among those who had the token of the covenant, or circumcision, until Christ should come ; that unto them as a body would he grve his revealed word, and all the means of grace 1 ADVANTAGES OP INFANT BAPTISM. 491 with which the Jews were favoured. And accordingly we do find, that notwithstandinoj the wickedness of the Jews as a nation, God would not forsake them, but contin- ued to be their God, and to grant unto them the means of grace ; while he left the other nations to walk in their own ways. When the Jews as a nation, wandered from God and rebelled against him, he would not give them up, but dealt with them by mercies and judgments, to bring them to a sense of their duty. And he frequently gave as the reason why he would not give them up in their most degenerate days, the covenant which he had made, of which circumcision was the sign and seal. And this promise implied further, that God would keep up a spirit- ual believing people among them, who should be heirs of everlasting life. And accordingly we have reason to be- lieve there were more pious persons among the small na- tion of the Jews, than all the rest of the world. Of the same import is this promise, "I will be their God," to the baptized. God has engaged to them as a collective body, that he will keep up his church among them ; that unto them shall be committed the oracles of God, and the means of instruction and grace ; and more- over that a spiritual believing seed shall be kept up a- mong them ; and that, although God, in a sovereign way, may sometimes bestow his saving grace upon somo who are visible ahens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, or who have not been baptized, yet the great proportion of his real people shall be taken from among those who have the toketi of his covenant upon them, or have been baptized. In short this promise imports, that as unto the circumcised of old, so now unto the baptized in a collective capacity, shall pertain "the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the service of God, and the promises;" Rom. ix. 4. These are the least blessings which the promise, " I will be their God imports ;" and these are very great and important blessings. And it is far more probable that persons interested in this promise, as all the baptized are, will partake of the saving grace of God, than they who are not. But it is highly probable that this promise, " I will be the God of your seed" in visible coveriant, means some- thing more and still greater, viz, : that in case of the faith- 492 SERMON CII. fulness of the parent, the seed in visible covenant, shall be made partakers of the grace of God, or that God will be tlicirGod in the highest sense, even their everlasting God. I dare not decidedly assert this ; but the sentiment has been advanced with confidence by eminent divines ; and the word of God seems to favour it. Of Abraham the Lord said, '• I know him that he will command his chil- dren, and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord, to do justice and judgment ;" Gen, xviii. J 9. Here was a prediction that Abraham would be fc.ilhful ; and a promise, that in consequence, his children and household should keep the way of the Lord. Of the same import is the following passage, Jer. xxxii. 38, ."39 ; "And they shall be my people, and I will be their God. And I will give them one heart, and one vvay, that they may fear me forever, for the good of them, and of their children after them." And also the following passages 1!) the prophecy of Isaiah. ''I will direct their work in truth, and 1 will make an everlasting covenant with them. And their seed shall be known among the Gentiles, and their offspring among the people : all that see them shall acknowledge them, that they are the seed which the Lord hath blessed ;" Is. Lxi. 8, 9. "They shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth for trouble : for they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord, and their offspring with them;" Is. Lxv. 23. "I will pour my Spirit upon thy seed, and my blessing upon thine offspring : and they shall spring up as amotjg the grass, as willows by the water courses;" Is X! iv. 3, 4. These texts seem to import, an absolute promise of saving grace to the covenant seed of parents iii covenant, on conditioii of the parents' faithfulness. It is true we see good men have wicked children. But good men like Lli are very otten unfaithful in the article ol the religious education of their cl ildren. But if parents were as iailhful as Abraham, we have reasoii to believe their children, in visible covenant, would sooner or later receive the blessings of divine grace. And if the promise to Uiose children, who have the seal of (tod's covenant ujon them, that God will be their God, imports, that God will sooner or later bestow saving grace upon them, in cjise pi! eiits are faithful, as it probably does, then the bi pi^ii. oi children is of vast importance to them. And if it does not absolutely import this, it imports at least ADVANTAGES OF INFANT BAPTISM. 49 those great advantages, which we have before shown, viz. : that to that collective body, to which they belong, shall be committed and continued, the oracles of God, and means of instruction and grace ; that God will keep up his visible church in the world among them ; and that he will also keep up a really pious people among them. So that to be interested in the promise, " I will be their God," is a very great blessing. This is one of the advan- tages of infant baptism. 2. Another advantage is that it is a security for the faith- fulness of parents^ that they will attend to the religious ed- ucation of their children. It is true that parents are un- der obligations arising from the relations they bear to God, to society, and to their children themselves, to train them up in the ways of virtue and piety. But we know that we are slow to learn our duty, and prone to forget and neglect it ; and these natural obligations very fre- quently are not perceived. Of this we have a proof in the opinion held, and frequently expressed and more fre- quently acted upon, by many parents, that, because they have never brought their children to baptism, nor come under vows, that therefore they are not bound to attend to their religious education. There can be no doubt that dedicating a child to God, and comiug under explicit vows, places our duty more distinctly before us, is calcu- lated to make us feel more our duty to the child, and is an additional security for the faithfulness of the parent. And although many parents, who offer their children in baptism, can violate and disregard, not only their natural obligations, but also their explicit vows ; yet there can be no doubt, there is more probahility that parents will be faithful to their children, when they have solemnly dedicated them to God, and vowed unto him, than when they have not. ^. Another advantage of infant baptism is thatit«z/ro- duces children to the prayers of the church. By baptism, chil- dren become members of Christ's visible church. They therefore become interested in all the prayers offered up for the church, by the people of God, in every part of the world ; and this is certainly a great privilege. And what increases the privilege is. that these prayers are enforced by very great and precious promises, which God has m his word made concerning his church. 401 SERMON Cll. 4. Another advantage of infant baptism is that the bap- tized are hereby introduced to the instructions of the church. This is one great, and we have reason to believe the chief end, that the great Head of the church had in view^, in di- recting that the seal of the covenant should be put upon children, and they be l)rought into a visible standing in his church ; viz. to secure their religious instruction. By baptism they are placed in the school of Christ. And not . only parents, but the church also, which as a mother re- ceives them into her bosom, is bound to attend to their religious instruction. It is the duty of the church by its proper officers, to see that parents do their duty to their baptized children ; frequently to remind them of their duty, and exhort, them to the performance of it ; to see that they bring them to the house of God ; that they pray with them and forthem; that they set a pious example be- fore them ; that they teach them to read (lod's holy word ; that they instruct them in the principles of reli- gion ; that they attend to their catechetical instruction, and submit them to be catechised and instructed by the church ; and that they use their endeavours to re- strain them from vicious courses. And it is the duty of the church by its constituted officers to attend to its bap- tized children, not only through the medium of the pa- rents, but immediately ; frequently to catechise and visit them, and administer instruction according to their capa- city to receive it. This would be an incalculable advan- tage of infant baptism, if the church was faithfully to do its duty. 5. I mention one other advantage of infant baptism, and that is discipline. Children by baptism are brought under the watch of the church, and become the subjects of its wholesome discipline. The church by its officers are bound to exercise for the good of the child, a watch o- ver the parents, who offered it ; and to admonish, reprove and rebuke them when they prove unfaithful. And when baptized children run into vicious courses, it is the duty of the church to endeavour to restrain or reclaim them, by admonishing, reproving, rebuking, and exhorting, with all long-suffering, tenderness, and anxious solicitude. And I would go further, and express the opinion, that when baptized cfiildren grow up in wicked courses, and become confirmed in habits of vice, and after faithful and patient ADVANTAGES OF INFANT BAPTISAf. 495 dealing with by the church, will not be reclaimed, it is the duty of the church to exclude them from their standing in it, and cut them off from membership, in the house of Christ, by the laws of which they obstinately and perse- veringly refuse to be governed. Were the church faithful in this article of discipline^, and the last mentioned article of instruction, we would not be so often at a loss to show the advantages of infant baptism. The state of society, we have reason to believe, would be far more moral than it is ; our congregations would be far better indoctrinated ; and a far greater pro- portion of our baptized children would become the sub- jects of divine grace. Then we would see fulfilled that prophecy, " All that see them shall acknowledge them, that they are the seed which the Lord hath blessed ;'* Is. LXi. 9. Our baptized children, we have reason to be- lieve, would then, agreeably toanotherprophecy, "Spring- up as among the grass, as willows by the water courses ;" Is. xLiv. 4. And the church would " look forth as the mor- ning, fair as the moon, clear as the sun, and terrible as an army with banners ;" Sol. Song. vi. 10. We shall now conclude this discouse with some inferen- ces from what has been said. 1. Our subject affords an answer to a popular objection against infant baptism ; viz. that it can do the child no good, because it is ignorant of it, and is not its own act. The very same objection lay with equal force against cir- cumcision. The child, of eight days old, knew nothing a- bout it ; but yet God commanded the child to be circum- cised. And this circumcision was a seal of the right- eousness of faith. And to the objector asking what pro- fit is it? The Apostle gave answer, *' Much every way; chiefly, because that unto them were committed the ora- cles of rjod. The same answer may be given to him, who asks, what profit is infant baptism .f"' Although the child at the time of receiving it be entirely ignorant of the transaction, yet it is calculated to be of great profit to him. He hereby becomes interested in that great promise, '• i will be their God." His parents become bound, by ex- plicit engagements made to God and his church, for his rcr ligious education, and thus he has an additional securi(v to the obligations arising from nature, that he will be trained up in the nurture and admonili»>n of thf' Lorrl. He 196 SERMOM CIl. becomes a constituent part of the church of Christ, and obtains an interest in all the prayers that are offered up for the church. And he is put under the instruction and discipline of the church. These are certainly great and precious advantagjes ; and we may say to those who ask what profit is there of infant baptism ? Much every way. 2. We infer from our subject that they who neglect the baptism of their children, deprive them of an important privilege. Yea, permit me, in faithfulness to add, they neglect a very important duty, and in tliis respect are guil- ty before God. Baptism we have shown stands in the place of circumcision. Now, remember that God called a neglect of circumcision a breach of his covenant ; and declared that the uncircumcised man-child should be cut off" from his people. Consider also the anger of the Lord against Moses, lor neglecting to put the seal of the cove- nant upon his children. We are told, he met him on his way from Midian to Egypt, in the inn, and sought to kill him. Let those who neglect this ordinance, think seri- ously on this subject. It is a subject of great importance, both to them and their children. From wliat has been said we learn, they are neglecting a very important duty, and are depriving their children of very important privi- leges. They are suffering their children to grow up as visible Heathen, aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise. 3. This subject instructs in their duty those who have offered their children to God in baptism. It is your duty to be faithlul to the spiritual interests of your children. If you are unfaithful, one great advantage of baptism is de- feated. It is your duty often to bear them on your hearts at the throne of grace, and plead their covenant relation; to pray with them, and for them ; to instruct them in the principles of the christian religion ; to restrain them from vice ; to set an example of piety before them ; and to sub- mit them cheerfully to the instructions and watch of the church. Be faithful, and you have great encouragement to hope, that sooner or later, God will pour out his Spirit upon your seed, and make them the subjects of his saving grace. 4. This subject reproves unfaithful parents. And alas! we have reason to fear there are too many sucli, who get dieir children baptized out of mere form; and who not- ADVANTAGES OF INFANT BAPTISM. 497 withstanding they come under the most solemn obligations to the great God, that they will train up their children in the ways of piety (for these obligations are implied in com- ing to the ordinance whether explicit promises be made or not) and yet afterwards scarcely think of their engage- ments, and habitually live in the neglect of their most so- lemn promises, and even act directly contrary to them; and besides neither consider themselves amenable to the church for their conduct, nor their children subject to its instructions and discipline. With respect to such child- ren our subject jjeaches, that their baptism can be of little or no service to them. For the great ends of baptism, the instructions and watch of the parents and of the church, are defeated. With respect to such we may say, in the language of the apostle in our context, their circum- cision is made uncircumcision. Their baptism prolit- eth nothing. Yea, this solemn mockery (for it is no bet- ter, as the judgment bar will show) will increase the con- demnation of those who are guilty of it. Brethren, bap- tism is a most solemn ordinance; it is a seal of God's holy covenant; and it becomes us to lay hold of this seal with reverence. Offering a child in baptism is a solemn cove- nanting with a heart-seaching God : and it therefore be- comes us to tome with great solemnity to this ordinance, and sacredly to keep our vows. And the prostitution of infint baptism isone leading cause, why so many minds are prejudiced against it. 5. From this subject we learn something of the qualifi- cations, the church ought to look for in those who are admitted to baptism for their children. They ought to consider themselves as subject to the instruction, watch, and discipline of the church, and be wiUing to submit their children to the same; otherwise one great end of baptism is defeated. And they ought to have such a cha- racter, as that the church may have ground to believe that the child will be piously educated ; for the child must be committed back again by the church to the offerer, to train it up. And if the offerer neglect the pious educa- tion of the child, one great end of baptism is defeated. 6. Again, we infer from our subject, that important du- ties are incumbent on the church. Let those of us my brethren who are officers in this church, be impressed with a sense of our charge. Let us see to it that the blood vol.. II. 63 498 SERMOM cm. of tlie lambs of this flock is not laid to our cliarge in the o-reat day of account, Let us study to know our duty. And knowing, let us do it. And may God strengthen us to the performance of it, and add his blessing. 7. Finally, baptized children and youth — remember that you are the lambs of Christ's flock, and subjects of peculiar privileges. Improve these privileges. Cheerful- ly submit yourselves to the advice, instruction, and watch, of the church. Profit by them, and avouch the Lord to be your God. As you have peculiar privileges, if you ne- glect or despise them, your guilt will b^ the greater in proportion to your privileges. SERMON cm. THE lord's supper. 1 cdRiNTHiANs XI. 23, 24, 25, 26. " For I have received of the Lord that which also /delivered unto you^ That the Lord Jesus, the same night in which he was betrayed, took bread: ^nd ivhen he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat; this is my body which is broken for you : this do in remembrance of me. Jfter the same inanner also he took the cup, ivhenhe had supped, saying. This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remem- brance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink thi^ cup, ye do show the Lord^s death till he come.'''' Many abuses prevailed in the Corinthian church, in the celebration of the Lord'sSupper. These abuses the apos- tle notices in our context. The members of this church came together divided among themselves, 'i hey con- vened in a disorderly manner. They waited not one for anotlier; and while some were hungry, others ate and drank to ex« ess and intoxication. For these abuse's the apostle severely reproved them ; and then to remedy these disorders, he referred them in our text THE lord's supper. 499 to "the original appointment. This he had received of the Lord, most probably, by immediate revelation; and had faithfully delivered unto them. The object of the ensuing discourse is to illustrate the nature of ihe Lord''s Supper. The doctrine as contained in our Catechism is as fol- lows: " The Lord's Supper is a sacrament, wherein by giving and receiving bread and ivine, according to Chrisfs appointment., his death is showed forth ; and the ivorthy receivers are, not after a corporal and carnal manner., but by faith made partakers of his body and blood with all his benefits., unto their spiritual nour- ishment and growth in grace. This ordinance is called the Lord^s Supper, because it was first instituted and observed in the evening, at the time of the meal called supper; and because it was insti- tuted by the Lord Jesus Christ, and is not of human in- vention. This we learn from the history of the institution as recorded by the evangelists ; and from the testimony of Paul in our text. It was instituted by Christ at a very interesting season, and in peculiarly interesting circumstances. He insti- tuted it in the same night in which he was betrayed by- Judas, and entered upon the last scene of those sufferings which he endured for us ; and when he knew the dread- ful suiferii.gs which were just before him. It was instituted to be a sacrament of the New Testa- ment. In it by sensible signs, spiritual blessings are sig- nified and sealed to the worthy receiver. It was instituted to be a perpetual ordinance inthechurch of CIn'ist ; and is still in force, and will be in tbrce, down to the end of time ; tor from our text we learn that in tliis ordinance the disciples of Christ were to show forth iiis death until his second coming, whiC; will be at the end of the world. "As oft as ye eat this bread and drink this cup ye do show the Lord's death till he come." — Besides as it was instituted by Christ, he alone has the right to abrogate it, which he has no where done; and it was observed by the apostles and disciples after his deatli, and by the primitive church, and by the church in all ages down to the present time. And there is as much need of this ordinance now, as there was at the time it was first instituted. From all which, it is evident, this ordi- nance is still in full force. 500 SERMON cm. The external elements in this sacrament are Vreacl and vine. It has been made a question what kind of bread and wliat kind of wine, ought to be used. Some have supposed that the bread ought to be unleavened ; and it is almost certain that it was first observed with unleavened bread, as it was instituted at the time of the passover, in which no leaven was fouud in the houses of the Jews. Butas it waskept with that kind of bread which tliej were then using, it is correct for us to do the same,and use that kind of bread which is in common use. As to the wine, eome suppose it ought to be red, which colour, best re- sembles the blood of Christ, which it is intended to re- present. But this is also a matter of indifference, as our Saviour gave no directions, and we knovv not what kind of wine he used, onlj that it was the fruit of the vine. The administration of the elements should I e I'j ministers of the gospel ; for to them, as stewards in the house of God, belong the dispensing of his word and ordinances. The sacramental actions on the part of the minister in this ordinance are, setting apart the elements by prayer and the words of institution, breaking the bread, and giv- ing both the bread and the wine to the communicants. Tlius our Saviour took the bread, and blessed it, and gave thanks, and gave it to his disciples. He gave them real bread and not wafers, as the Romish church do in this or- dinance. After the same manner he took the cup. and \\ lien he had given thanks, he gave it unto them, directing them to divide it among themselves. And here it may be proper to notice a pra( tice in the Roman Catholic church, of witfiholding the cup from the laity, in this ordinance, "which first became a law in that church, by a decree of the council of Constance, about 100 years before the Re- formation. This grew out of their do( trine of transub- stantiation. For, supposing after consecration, the bread to be the real body of Christ, and the wine his blood ; as flesh contains blood, they hold that both the flesh and blood of Christ are received, by partaking of the conse- crated wafer, which they substitute in the place of bread ; or rather by partaking of what they say appears to be the wafer. But why the priests receive the cup while it is withheld from the laity, is hard to determine. This with- hoidiiig the cup from the commo) peopl " in this ordinance, is without Scriptural warrant; yea in opposition to the THE lord's supper. 501 instructions of Scripture. The ordinance was adminis- tered in both elements at first. And although it is true ihey were all ministers who sat at the table, when the or- dinance was first instituted ; yet as the manner in which the ordinance was at that time observed, was to be an example in succeeding celebrations; and as no direction was then given to make any distinction between clergy and laity, it follows of course that the ministers of Christ, in administering the ordinance, should make no distinc- tion. Besides the apostle in our text, to correct the abu-r ses which had crept into the Corinthian church, refers them to the original institution, to teach them how they ought to keep this ordinance, in which he mentions the cup as to be given and received as well as the bread. And in a following verse, he exhorts, " Let a man exam- ine himself, and so let him eat of that bread and drink of that cup." Here the exhortation is given to a inan — any man, to examine himself ; and then not only to eat of that bread, but also to drink of that cup. The minister is to give both tne bread and the wine to the communi- cants, who are to receive tliem, and to eat the bread and drink the wine. The posture in which the elements should be received, has also been made a question. Some receive them standing, some sitting, and others kneeling. I do not suppose that the posture is at all essential to the ordi- nance. But we hold sitting to be the best; because thie is the table posture, and this was the posture in which the ordinance was first received, when our Lord himself was at the table. It was while sitting at the table, after hav- ing eaten the passover, that he instituted this ordinance ; and we have in Scripture no precept or example for any other posture. In this ordinance the bread and wine are only signs. The things signified are the body and blood of Christ. The bread represents his body which was broken for us : and the wine his blood, which was shed for us. The bread and wine only represent the body and blood of Christ, and are not his real body and blood, as has been most absurdly held. The Roman Catholics hold to this opinion. They suppose, that after the words ol consecration by the priest, the bread and wine are chan- ged into the real body and blood of Christ ; that although 5D2 SERMON cin. the appearance of bread and wine remain, there is only the appearance, and not the reality ; wliat appears to be bread, is really the body of" Clirist, and what appears to be wine, is really the blood of Christ. Tliis doctrine is called transuhstantiation. It was once, pre\'ious to the Re- formation, for a long time, almost universally received, by what was called the christian chuj'ch. Volumes l:ave been written to explain and defend it. The elements have been worshipped in consequence. And many have suffered as martyrs, for daring to question the truth of this doctrine. It is founded on a literal understanding of the words of institution, ^ This is my body." But it is evident there are many expressions in Scripture w^hich must be understood figuratively. Thus Christ is called a stone, a rock, a corner-stone, a way, a door, a vine, and the like ; but common sense teaches us that these are figurative ex- pressions ; and it equally teaches us that the expression, " This is my body," is not to be understood literally, but figuratively. I need not spend time before this audience, in endeavouring to show the monstrous absurdity of this doctrine. It denies the testimony of our senses ; it (on- tradicts reason and common sense, and involves the most palpable absurdities. And besides we may observe, that in our text, the apostle speaks of the bread and 'wine, after the consecration; "For as often as ye eat this breads and drink this cup^ ye do show the Lord's deatli till he come." After the commencement of the Reformation, another doctrine called consubslantiatioti, was broached on this sub- ject by Martin Luther. He held and taught, that ai- thougli the bread and wine are not, by the form of conse- crntion, turned into the body and blood of Christ, never- theless the body and blood of Christ are present in, with, and under the elements of bread and wine in this ordi- DRUce, and received with them. But this doctrine is lia- ble to almost all the objections of the former, and is al- most equally absurd. It occasioned much disputing a- mong the Reformers, was a great hindrance to the pro- gress of the Reformation, and finally caused a separation between the Lutheran and the Reformed churches. In opposition to both these errors of transuhstantiation, and cotisuhstantiation, we believe that Christ is not cor- porally present in this ordinance, nor received in a corpo- THE lord's supper, 503 ral manner, but nevertheless that he is spiritually pres- ent; and that the worthy receivers do by faith feed upon his body and hlood, or re( eive and apply the benefits of his broken body and shed blood, for their spiritual nour- ishment and growth in grace. We proceed to illustrate the design of this ordinance or the ends for wliich it was instituted. 1. It was instituted to be a memorial of Christ. This design of the institution we have contained in our text, in the following words, " Take, eat, this is my body wliich is broken for you : this do in remembrance of me. This cup is the New Testament in my blood : this do ye as oft as ye drink it in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the Lord's death till he come." We have the same design of the institution, contained in the account which the evangel- ists have given us. This ordinance was instituted to be a standing evidence in the world, of Christ's sufferings and death until his second coming. And it has greatly tended to keep alive the memory of these events. And it was especially intended to recall to the memory ofthe people of Christ, and impress their minds with a lively sense of his love, his sufferings, and his death. He knew how much we are affected, in our present state, by sensi- ble objects ; and how prone his disciples would be to for- get him ; and therefore he instituted this ordinance to re- call !)is love, sufferings, and death, forcibly to their re- membrance. And the signs which he chose, are aptly fitted to do this. The bread which has been threshed, ground, crushed beneath the millstone, and which is bro- ken in the ordinance, affords a significant emblem of the bruising and breaking of his body for us ; and the wine, which has been violently pressed from the grape, anJ which is poured out into the cup, gives a lively represen- tation ol the shedding and pouring out of his blood. 2. This ordinance was instituted to be a sea/ of the cov- enant of grace. This design of the ordinance Me are taught in the words of institution. " This cup is the New Testament in my blood." That is, it is a sign and seal of the New Testament, or covenant of grace founded in the blood of Christ. The I^ord's Supper is a standing e\ i- dence of the reality ofthe covenant of grace ; and it seals to the worthy communicant, all the blessings ofthe cove- ,"504 SERMON ClU. nant ; and the communicant, by partaking of this or- dinance, voluntarily engages and binds himself to per- form all that this covenant requires. God on his part engages to the worthy receiver, and by this ordinance seals the engagement, that he will be his God ; that he will bestow upon him all the blessings of salvation which Christ purchased by his death ; that he hath for the sake of Christ forgiven all his sins, and accepted him as righteous in his sight ; that he will, through sanc- tification of the ^Spirit, make him meet for glory ; that he will keep him by his mighty power through faith un- to salvation ; and that he will tinally bestow upon hira everlasting life. And the communicant, on his part, en- gages to be the Lord's. He publicly assents to the ar- ticles of the covenant, and binds himself to the perform- ance of the duties therein required. He professes that the death of Christ is the foundation of all his hopes. He professes faith in him, and repentance of all his sins. He declares that he has renounced, and that he forever will renounce, the service of sin and Satan. And he en- gages that he will deny himself, take up his cross, and follow Christ, and live devoted to him, in the performance of all the duties which he hath required, and abstaining from the sins whi( h he forbids. By coming to this ordi- nance he takes an oath of allemance to the Lord Jesus Christ, as the Captain of his salvation. The proper meaning of the word sacrament is a military oath. The partaker of this ordinance does by this act swear allegi- ance toChrist, and solemnly binds himself !o fight under his banners, against the world, the flesh and the devil, and yield up his life rather than renounce his service. 3. This ordinance was instituted to be an ordinance in which for the saints to hold communion together; and hence it is styled the communion. This design of the or- dinance we have contained in the following declaration of the apostle to the Corinthians : "l he cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood ot Christ; the bread which we break, is it not the commu- nion of the body of Christ ; and we being many are one bread and one body; for we are all partakers of that one bread." In this view of the ordinanc e, it was designed to cultivate brotherly love : to teach christians that they are one family, and that therefore they ought to be of one mind, and to live together as brethren. THE lord's supper. 50i> Thus I have pointed out the design of the ordinance; and from the design we may learn its use. It is of use to hold up to the view of the world, the death of Christ ; and thus to leave thete who neglect or despise the salvation which he putchasied by his death, the more inexcusable. It is of use to call forcibly and fre- quently to the remembrance of the people of Christ, his love, sufTerings, and death ; and in a peculiarly lively manner to impress a sense of these upon their minds. And such a sense of these as this ordinance is calcula- ted to produce, will have a tendency to warm our own souls with love to Christ ; to raise our affections ; to en- kindle our devotions ; to excite our gratitude to Christ ; to warm our zeal for the advancement of his cause and glory in the world; to increase our hatred of sin, whicb was the cause of his death, and which is so offensive to him who has loved us so much ; to humble us under a sense of our deserts ; to fdl us with self-denial, heavenly mindedness, patience, and submission to the will of God, of which, in his death we have such a bright example ; to increase our faith in him as a Saviour, having fully satisfi- ed divine justice by his death; and to confirm our hope in the mercy of God through him. For he that spared not his own Son ; but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things. As a badge of our christian profession, a seal of the cove-' nant, and an oath of allegiance to Jesus Christ, it is of use to keep up the visible church of Christ, in the world, and keep his people separate from the world ; it is of use to strengthen their faith and hope in the promises of the cov- enant, of which they have received the pledge and seali and thus greatly to increase their faith ; and it is of use to place their duty frequently and more distinctly before them. It brings them under voluntary and public cove- nant-engagements, and frequently reminds them of these engagements, and thus has a natural tendency, to make those who come to it aright, more watchful, more prayer- ful, more penitent, more fearful of sin, more self-denying, more obedient, and in short, more holy in every respect; and thus is of great use, as a means in the hands of the divine Spirit, to carry on the work of sanctification, and ripen the soul for glory. Again, as the communion of saints, this ordinance i& VOL. n. G4 506 SERMOM cm. of use to promote a spirit of brotherly love ; to keep down all angry passions; to teaclt and impress upon the mind tie duty of forgiveness of injuries; and thus to prepare the soul for the communion of saints in heaven, where every angry and disc ordant passion shall be banished, and uni- versal and perfect love prevail. Thus in this ordinance, while the worthy communicant partakes of the external emblems of bread and wine, his soul may by faith be made a partaker of the body and blood of Christ, or of the benefits of his deatfi, to his spir- itual nourishment and growth in grace. I conclude this discourse with a few observations, suggested by what has been said. This discourse reproves those who neglect the ordinance of the Supper. Has the Son of God be- come incarnate, and did he suffer and die to purchase salvation for sinners ? and did he, just before he left the world, institute this ordinance to be a memorial of his love and sufferings for us ? What ingratitude to neg- lect it ! and how criminal must such neglect be, after so much love ! Does God in this ordinance present his cov- enant, sealed and ratified on his part, and call upon you to set your seal to it.^ How criminal to despise or neg- lect this covenant, or refuse to own it ! Be assured that this ordinance will increase your condemnation, if you continue to neglect it. Again, this discourse reproves those who come to this ordinance with improper tempers, or who live inconsis- tently with the covenant-engagements which they here make. Are there not some who ( ome, not to remember Christ ; but to answer some selfish ends.'' Are there not some who pretend to remember him, and yet do not love him ? Are there not some who, by coming to this ordi- nance, call Christ master, and Judas-like say, hail master, and yet betray him by their walk and conversation ? Are there not some who by coming to tliis ordinance take God's covenant into their mouths, and then go away and daily break it ? And are there not some who come to this communion of saints, who at the same time indulge themselves in anger, and malice, and evil-speaking, to- wards their professed brethren ? And who even ap- proach t! e table of the Lord unreconciled to some of their professed bretlircn, and entertaining an unforgiving temper towards them ? Our discourse solemnly reproves qUALIFICATIONS FOR THE LORd's SUPPER. 507 all sucli ; and teaches them that they are wholly disqual- ified for this ordinance ; that they act inconsistentLy with the design of the institution, and are eating and drinking judgment to themselves. SERMON CIV. QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE L0RD*'s SUPPER. 1 CORINTHIANS XI. 27, 28, 29. " TVherefore^ lohosoever shall eat this breads and drink this cup of the Lord^ unworthihj, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. For he that eateth and drinketh umvorthily, eateth and drinketh damna" tion to himself not discerning the Lord''s body. Several disorders prevailed in the Corinthian church at the celebration of the Lord's Supper. To rectify the^e disorders, the apostle in our context, instructed the members of this church, in the nature and design of the institution ; informing them, that it was not a common meal, but a sacred ordinance; that the bread and wine ■were emblematical of the body and blood of Christ ; that they were to be received in remembrance of him ; and that as often as they received them, they showed forth his death. Hence he inferred in our text, that whosoever received these elements unworthily, would be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. By improperly receiving the elements, persons would show such a carelessness about Christ, and such a want of reverence, respect, and affection for him, or such a contempt of him, as would manifest that they had the temper of those who crucified him, and as would have a tendency to injure his cause; so that they would in a meaiiiure be sharers in the guilt of those who wounded his body and shed his blood upon the cross. jOy iERMON CIT. This being the rase, the apostle therefore exhorted them to a careful self-examination, that they might avoid this guilt, and come to the ordinance prepared to keep it aright. This duty he further enforced in the next verse, by the dreadful consequence of unworthily communi- cating. On the last Sabbath, the nature, design, and use, of the Lord's Supper were explained. AVe proceed now, to consider the qualifications to come to this ordinance. These qualifications are pointed out in our Catechism in the answer to the 97th question : " What is required to the worthy receiving of the LorcVs Supper ? It is required of them that icould ivorthily partake of the Lord''s Supper, that they examine themselves of their knowl- edge to discern the Lord''s body, and their fcnth to feed iipon him; of their repentance, love, and new obedience ; lest com- ing unworthily, they eat and drink judgment to themselves.''* By worthiness, in this answer, and in our text, we arc not to understand a personal worth or merit, entitling us to come to this ordinance. In this sense, tliere are none worthy; for none of our sinful race have any merit in the sight of God to entitle them to this or any other privilege; and on this ground every soul must be debarred as un- worthy. But by worthiness to partake of this ordinance is meant a meetness or preparedness for it ; that is, possess- ing those qualifications which the gospel requires. The person who possesses these qualifications, whatever they are, is worthy in the sense in which we are to understand this word, as used in reference to the ordinance of the Lord's Supper ; however unworthy he may be in himsell^, or however unworthy he may feel himself to be, to come to the ordinance. What then are those qualifications, which the gospel requires, to fit a person to come aright to the holy ordi- nance of the Supper .'' I answer, to entitle a person in the sight of God to come to this ordinance, he ought to have real piety, and have his graces in exercise ; and to entitle him in'the sig t of the church, he ought to give credible evidences of real piety. 1 hat a person ought to have real piety to entitle him in the sight ol God, appears from a number of consideratione •QUALIFICATION'S FOR THE LORd's SUPPER. ."509 and a numl»er of passages of Scripture, which might he mentioned and illustrated. I will however at present ar- gue this point, onl_y from the nature of the ordinance, from "vvhich it will sufficiently appear that all who come to it ought to have real piety. In the discourse on tlie last Sabbath morning, it was shown, that the ordinance of the Lord's Supper was insti- tuted to be a memorial of Christ, a seal of the covenant of grace, and the communion of saints. Considered in eitlier of these respects, the nature of the ordinance teaches, that a person ought to have real piety to be entitled in the sight of God to come to this ordinance. Was the ordinance instituted to be a memorial of Christ, and is it to be observed in remembrance of iiim t It is certain we cannot do this aright without real piety. For it is self-evident that Christ cannot be remembered aright "without love. But without piety there can be no true love to Christ : for the Scriptures teach us that the carnal mind," by which is meant the unrenewed mind, "-is enmi- ty against God ;" Rom. viii. 7. Hence it is evident tiiat tlie person who is destitute of piety has no true love to Clirist ; and most assuredly such a person cannot remem- ber Christ aright ; and therefore true piety is necessary to come aright to this ordinance. Again, was this ordinance instituted to be a seal of the covenant of grace .'^ God seals the blessings of this cov- enant to none but his real people; therefore none but his real people, have a right to this seal. It is absurd, (hat any others should pretend to receive it, since it is not giv- en to them by God, and seals nothing to them. On the part of sinners, the articles of the covenant of grace are all summed up in this sentence, that they will be tlie people of God, which includes all the duties of religion, as faith, repentan( e, love, and holy obedience. He ifiat is in cov- enant with God is bound to fulfil the articles thereof; and the Lord's Supper is a seal of his engngement to fulfil these articles. He hereby publicly and solemnly bis ids himself to be the Lord's and ins alone. He professes that Christ is the only foundation of his hope of salvation, and that he believes in him, and by f lilh takes him as his Sa- viour; he professes repentance of all his sins; and ie binds himself to live to the glory of God, by keepi >g hiB commandments. This being the natiu-e of this transac- 5lO SERMON CIV. lion, most assuredly no person can come to this ordinance ari'^-lit miless he has true rehgion. He who has not true pietv does not assent to the articles of the covenant, and llierefore he must he insincere in setting his seal ; and it is ahsurd for him to set his seal to a covenant, which was never made with him, and to which he does not assent. It is virtually trifling with omniscience and mocking the heart-searching God. In agreement with these observa- tions is that solemn text, Ps. l. 1 6 ; " Unto the wicked God saith, what liast thou to do to declare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth ?" Hence, from a consideration of this ordinance as a seal of the cov- enant of grace, it appears that true piety is an essential qualification to come aright to the ordinance. We must come to the same conclusion, if we consider the ordinance as the communion of saints. None but those who are really saints can be fit for, or enjoy this communion. Light and darkness are not more opposite to each other than religion and irreligion, or the temper of a saint and of one who is not pious. It is therefore im- possible for one who has not religion to hold christian communion with one who has; and it is absurd for him to come to the Lord's table to hold communion with the people ofChrist. We may observe again, that in this ordinance, not only the people ofChrist hold communion with each other; but Christ holds communion with his people. This the a- j)ostle intimates in the same passage, in which he teaches that this ordinance is the communion of saints. " The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood ofChrist.^ The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body ofChrist ?" 1 Cor. x. 16. He introduced this passage to show that the Corinthians ought not to join with the Heathen in their religious festi- vals'; for as in the Lord's Supper they professed to hold communion with Christ, so by partaking of these idola- trous feasts which were kept in honour of idols, their com- munion would be with these idols. This being the case, it is certain that none can be fit for this ordinance, unless they are fit to hold communion with Christ. But, "What communion hath Ijorht with darkness.? And what con- cord liathChrist witfi Belial?" 2 Cor. vi. 15, 16. An un- veuewed soul cannot hold communion with Christ; and QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE LORd's SUPPER. 511 therefore, without true piety, a person must be unfit for this ordinance. From all these considerations we conclude, that true piety is an essential requisite to a right participation of this ordinance. Tliis is children's bread, and none but children have a right in the sight of God to partake ofit. Will it be objected to this conclusion, that there was a- Judas at the Lord's Supper, when Christ himself admin- istered it ; and that as he knew the hearts of all men, he knew that he was a hypocrite, and not a real disciple ; and that therefore if he had intended to make true piety a requisite qualification, he would have debared Judas from this ordinance ? To this objection I answer, it is not cer- tain that Judas was at the Lord's Supper. It is certain he sat down with the rest of the apostles to eat the passo- ver; but whether he continued sitting with them until they received the Lord's Supper, or went out before, is doubt- ful. But admitting that he was at the ordinance with our Lord himself, it proves notliing against the conclusion which has been drawn. For Christ intending by his con- duct in the first administration of the ordinance, to set an example to his church in future ages, treated Judas ac- cording to his visible character; and he was visibly a pi- ous man. We have no evidence that his character pre- vious to this time did not stand as fair as that of any of the disciples. So that the instance of Judas (admitting that he was at the Lord's Supper) proves nothing against the position, that persons to have a right to this ordinance^ and to come acceptably in the sight of God, ouglit to have real piety. It only teaches us, that the church, in receiv- ing persons to thisordinance oughtto be guided by theirvis- ible character. And it holds up a solemn warning to all hypocrites, who in the end of Judas may see the danger of drawing nigh unto God with their mouths, and hon- ouring hitv 'vith their lips, while their hearts are far from him. The qualifications to come to the Lord's Supper, in the sight of the church oughtto be visible piety. For the oi- ficers in the cliurcli, cannot search the heart ; but they ought to look for evidence of that which God requires, wb'*^h has been shown to be real piety. And since they have committed to them by Christ, the keys of th^ visi« jlli i£RMON CiV. hie kingdom, with power to open and shut it, it becomeg them to examine persons, applying to be received to the Lord's Supper, to enable them to form a judgment wheth- er they possess or not the requisite qualifications. But it is not enough for those who approach the Lord's table, to be examined by the proper authority in.lhe church, and to bejudged by them qualified for this ordi- nance ; they ought also, carefully to examine themselves. Self-examination is at all times an important duty ; but more especially as a preparative for the Lord's Supper. The exhortation of the apostle, " examine yourselves, whether ye he in thelaith; prove your own selves;" 2 Cor. xiii. 5, is a duty which is daily binding, and which should daily be performed ; but when we are about to ap- proach the Lord's table, we are peculiarly called to this duty : and then our self-examination should be peculiar- ly strict, as the apostle exhorts in our text, " Let a man ex- amine himself and so let him eat of that bread and drink of that cup." In general, persons ought carefully "to examine themselves, whether they are christians. To decide, in some good measure, with satisfaction to themselves, this all-impor- tant question, they ought carefully and impartially to com- pare their character with that of the true christian, as drawn in the word of God ; and according as they agree or disagree, draw the conclusion respecting their own character. The particular points on which they ought especially to examine themselves, we have enumerated in our Cate- chism, in the answer already cited. These points are, their knowledge to discern the Lord's body, their faith to feed upon him, their repentance, their love, and their new obedience. On each of these points, we ought in our preparation for the Lord's Supper, carefully to exam- ine ourselves ; because, they who have these graces are christians, and therefore are habitually prepared for the ordinance ; and also because these are the graces which ought more especially to be called into exercise in this ordinance. Let us for a few moments attend more par- ticularly to each of these points. L \Ve ought to examine ourselves as to our hioivledge to discern the Lord's body. This was the great reason which the apostle gave, why tlie Corinthiant were so QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE LORD's SUPPER. 513 guilty in their celebration of the Lord's Supper ; they did not discern the Lord's body. Tliey were ignorant of the spiritual si«;nification of the ordinance, and looking upon it as a common meal, they did not througii the signili( ant elements of bread and wine, discern the Lord s body thereby signified. They were, neither doctrinally nor experimentally, acquainted with the nature of this ordi- nance. It becomes us therefore, previous to our coming to the Lord's Supper, to examine ourselves, as to our knowledge of the nature of the ordinance, and labour to obtain correct views on this subject, and to have these views clearly in our minds. In this knowledge we have reason to fear, many communicants are greatly de- ficient. And it is difficult to conceive, how persons, ■who are thus ignorant, can derive any benefit from the ordinance. Yea, coming to the ordinance, while totally ignorant of its nature, design and use, is a profanation of it, tor whicii the Corinthians were severely reproved by the apostle. Examine yourselves therefore my breth- ren as to your knowledge to discern the Lord's body — your knowledge of the nature of the ordinance, the plan of salvation through Christ therein represented, and the manner in which he is to be received and fed upon; and furtlier, examine yourselves, whether you ap- prove of the truths taught in this ordinance. This lat- ter is that experimental knowledge which is necessary to an experimental discernment of the Lord's body, without which, all doctrinal knowledge will be in vain. 2. We ought to examine ourselves as to our faith to feed upon Christ. The great use of this ordinance to the christian is, to increase and strengthen his graces. Christ in this ordinance is offered as the food of the soul. Now faith is that grace, by which the soul, in this ordinance, looks through the external signs, and contemplates tlie things signified, and receives and applies Christ and his benefits. Wq ought therefore to examine ourselves, whetlier w^c hp.ve a real, gospel faith ; for without this we cannot be christians, nor have any right to this ordinance; and w^ithout this wecatmotfeed spiritually upon Christ, nor receive any benefit in the ordinance. And we ought to examine, not only wlicther we have a true faith, but al- so, whether this faitli be in lively exercise; and labour to have it in such exercise, that we may be enabled t© VOL. If. ♦ii 514 SERMON CIV. feed on Christ, to our spiritual nourishment and growth in grace. 3. We ought in coming to this ordinance, to examine ourselves as to our repentance. Repentance also is neces- sary to the christian character : For " except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish;" Luk. xiii. 5. And repentance is a grace, in the exercise of which, the christian ought daily to live, because he daily comes short of his duty and commits sin. But more especially should this grace be exercised at the table of the Lord. For the scene which is here exhibited is intended to fill us with sorrow for sin, with humihty under a sense of it, and with a hatred of it, and to excite and strengthen our resolutions against it. We ought therefore to come to the table of the Lord, in the exercise of repentance, and to examine ourselves that we may know, whether we have this essential grace of the christian, and whether it be in lively exercise, arid to la- bour to have it in such exercise, that while by faith we look on him whom we have pierced, we may mourn. 4. We ought to examine ourselves as to our /ot;c, both to God and the brethren. For love in both these senses, is essential to the christian character, and is a grace which must be exercised in the right reception of this ordinance. The Lord's Supper is a memorial of Christ, and he ought to be remembered with sincere and supreme love. Let us therefore examine ourselves, whether we do truly love Christ ; and whether our love be warm, or languid ; and labour to have it in lively exercise that we may remem- ber him with raised affections. Further t?ie Lord's Sup- per is the communion of saints, and is intended to pro- mote brotherly love. We ought therefore to examine ourselves as to our love to the brethren ; for without this we cannot be christians, as we read, " he that loveth not his brother, whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?" L John iv. 20. And if we have that brotherly love, which is essential to the chris- tian character, we will be ready to forgive injuries : for ^nrist hath told us, expressly, " If ye forgive not men their tresspasses, neither will your Father forgive your tresspasses;" Mat. vi. 1.5. And further, without this bro- therly love and spirit of forgiveness, we cannot be fit for the communion of saints. 5. We ought to examine ourselves as to our new ohedl- QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE LORd's SUPPER. 515 ence, "If ye love me (said Christ) keep my command- ments. If a man love me he will keep my words :" John xiv. 15, 23. " Follow holiness (said an Apostle) without which no man shall see the Lord ;" Heb. xii. 14. New obedience is an essential trait of the christian character. Let us therefore examine ourselves, whether we walk ha- bitually in the ways of Christ's commandments ; let us be humbled that we live no more to his glory ; and let us come to his table resolved to live more entirely devoted to his service. Thus, I have briefly pointed out, wherein we should examine ourselves previous to our approaching the table of the Lord. This duty of self-examination is enforced in our text, by most solemn considerations, viz. the guilt and danger of unworthily partaking. The guilt we have in the first verse of our text. " Whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord." Such persons, as it ^vere, crucify Christ afresh, and are chargeable with a guilt, similar to that of those, who broke his body and shed his blood upon the cross. The danger of unworthily communicating is pointed outin the last verse of our text, in language sufficient to make us examine diligently, and be exceedingly careful how we approach this holy ordinance. " For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh dam- nation to himself" Let us here briefly examine the im- port of this part of our text. The word here translated damnation^ signifies judgment and condemnation. It is tlie same word in the original, in this verse, as in the last verse of this chapter, where it is rendered condemnation. The word theretbre signifies nothing more than the judg- ment or condemnation merited by every sin, and which may be averted by repentance. It does not import, as some tender consciences have supposed, that the sin of unworthily communicating is unpardonable, and that per- sons thereby seal their damnation. For we know that some of those who were guilty of the murder of Christ were afterwards pardoned ; and most assuredly the sin of being guilty of the body and blood of Christ in the ordi- nance, cannot be greater, nor so great, as the sin of shed- ding his real blood. Besides by the damnation or judg- 516 SERMON CIV. ' ment of which the apostle here spake, we have reason to believe he meant temporal judgments : for he immediate- ly added, " for this cause many are weak and sickly a- mong you, and many sleep ;" which is generally under- stood to mean that the Lord had sent sickness and mor- tality among the Corinlhians for their profanations of the Lord's Supper. And further in a following verse we read, " When we are judged we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not he condemned with the world." — By which is evidently meant, that these temporal judg- ments were sent upon them by the Lord, to bring them to repentance, that they might not be finally condemned, but saved. But still, although the sin of unworthily receiving the Lord's Supper is not unpardonable, it is a great sin, and will issue in our final and aggravated condemnation and. destruction, utdess repented of We ought therefore most carefurly to examine ourselves, that we may not be guilty of this sin, or come under tliis condemnation. And I would further observe that this solemn declaration was not pla( ed here, to deter from this ordinance, the humble soul, who, filled with a sense of his unworthiness, and trembling, lest he may approach in an improper manner, scarcely dare come ; hut it was intended to deter the pre- sumptuous and profane, and excite all to a careful self- examination. You have heard, my brethren, who have a right to come to the ordinance of the Lord's Supper, viz. the christian after a careful self-examination. Have you evi lences that you are christians, and have you been ende ivouring by a careful self-examination to satisfy your-iclves on this subject, and to call forth your gra- ces into lively exercise ? Come then to the Supper of the Lord. Have you knowledge to discern the Lord's body ? Do you understand the nature of this ordinance ? Have you an approving knowledge of its spiritual signification,'^ Have you faith to feed upon Christ .-^ Have you repented of all your sins .'^ Do you love Christ, sincerely and supremely ? Do you love the brethren ? Do you not entertain enmity m your hearts against any ? Have you from your hearts forgiven all who have injured you ? Are you walking in new obe- dience ? Have you been engaged in endeavouring to PRAYER. 517 call forth your graces into exercise ? Come then to the table of the Lord. This is the memorial of Christ. Do you love him .^ Come then and do this in remembrance of him. This is the seal of the covenant of grace. Arc you willing to have the Lord for your God, and Christ lor your Saviour on gospel terms .^ Are you wilhng to be the Lord's, and to make an uin-eserved surrender of your- selves to Christ to be saved and governed by him in his own way ? come then, and seal the covenant. Tiiis is the communion of saints. Do you love the bretbrcn? Have you forgiven all ? Come then to the communion of saints. May the Lord strengthen to come, all w hom he invites to this ordinance. — Awex. SERMON CV. PRAYER. PHILLIPPIANS IV. 6. LAST CLAUSE. "/» every thing by prayer and supplication^ with thanksgiving; let your requests be made known unto GodP The duty enjoined in this passage is /jmj/cr. This is a duty ijicumbent on all, whatever may be their charac- ter or situation in lite. Tliis none will pretend to i\v\\y, who believe the Scriptures to be the word of God. For it is too frequently and explicitly taught to admit ofdeni il for a moment. And it is also plain Irom ihr word ot CmkI. that the right pertbrmance of this duty is essential to the favour of God; and that a prayerless pjM'son must be des- titute of the grace of God. But that prayer is a duty in- cumbent on all, is taught, not only by tlic word ofCiod. but also by the light of nature. The obligation to the- performance of tliis duty does not rest on a positive com- mand ; but it rises out of the relation of creaturr and Creator: and prayer would brour duty if (iod had nrver commanded it. God is the author and upholder ot our i)\i^ SERMOM CV. being; Fie is; the source of all our blessings; and he holds our lives and destinies in liis hand, and can make us hap- pj or miserable. Man is his creature, created, preserv- ed, and supported bj him, and entirely in his hands. And if God be such a being, and man such a being, surely reason teaches, that it is the duty of the latter to pray un- to the former. Agreeably to this reasoning, we find the duty of prayer to be universally acknowledged by the Heathen, who are guided by the light of nature. Even among the most stupid idolaters, we find them bowing down before their respective deities, and praying unto them, though made of stocks and stones. They, therefore who neglect the duty of prayer, act not only in direct opposition to the plain and repeated instructions of Rev- elation; but also to those of the light of nature. And most assuredly the Heathen will rise up in the judgment against such and condemn them. And they who deny prayer to be a duty, not only deny the word of God, but act in opposition to the light of nature, and the voice of mankind in all ages and countries. However prayer may be neglected in our world, it is a duty taught both by revelation and reason ; and it is a duty so important, that the man who neglects it, must be destitute of the grace of God, and a saving interest in his favour. As soon as a man begins to be really serious, he will no longer continue prayerless ; but with Paul, "Beliold he prayeth ;" Acts ix. 11. That prayer is es- sential to the character of a truly pious man, is evident from the general tenor of the Scriptures. The Scripture saints Hved in the liabitual performance of the duty of prayer. Christ himself whose example his people are to follow, frequently was engaged in prayer. The duty is frequently enjoined, as in the following texts : " Men ought always to pray, and not to faint ;" Luk. xviii. 1. *' Watch and pray;" Mat. xxvi. 41. Continuing instant in prayer;" Rom. xii. 12. "Praying always, with all prayer;" Eph. vi. 18. "Pray without ceasing ;" 1 Thes. V. 17. And in our text, "In every thing by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known unto God." And we find the constitu- tion which God has ordained is, " Ask and it shall be given you— every one that asketh, receiveth ;" Mat. vii. 7, 8. " The Lord is nigh unto' all them that call PRAYER. 519 upon him, to all that call upon him in truth ;" Ps. cxlv, 18. " Then shall ye call upon me, and ye shall go and pray unto me, and I will hearken unto you ;" Jer. xxix. 12. From all these considerations, it is evident that thy that dreadful imprecation of the prophet Jeremiah. "Pour out thy fury upon the families that call not on thy name ;" Jer. X. 2/3. We proceed to consider the 3. Kind of prayer, viz. secret^ which should be perform- ed by each individual alone. Much need not be said to prove this kind of prayer to be duty. Pious persons in all ages have lived in the habitual practice of it. Nu- merous examples of its performance are recorded in Scripture. Our Saviour also has set us an example in this respect that we should follow in his steps. We read that he went apart to a mountain, a garden, and other private places to pray; and that he rose before day, and retired in the night for this purpose. He has also given us directions how this duty should be performed, which certainly implies the duty. " When thou prayest (said be) enter into thy closet ;" that is, some place removed from human observation, "and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret ; and thy Fa- ther which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly;" Mat. vi. 6. 4. The 4th kind of prayer is called ejaculatory. This also is personal and secret ; and it diifers from secret prayer, properly so called, only in this, that we retire for the latter, and formally engage in it, while the former is putting up with our hearts a short petition, confession, or thanksgiving, while engaged in our ordinary worldly business. We proceed to the II. General head of our discourse, viz. to consider the proper seasons for prayer, or how often we ought to engage in this duty. As to the public prayers of the congregation, in which it is o'.H'duty to unite, we ought to engage in them, at least every Sabbath, except when necessarily prevented. And the christian who loves prayer, and who delights, as he 2(33 SERMON cvr. ought, to engage in this duty with the people ofGod, will clieerfully embrace other opportunities, besides the Sab- bath, to unite in public and social prayer. The apostles and primitive christians did not confine their social wor- Gliip to the Sabbath, but they frequently engaged in this business on other days of the week. These extra meet- ings for social prayer have ever been precious to the people of God ; and they have been signally attended with the divine blessing. And the blessing with which Cod has attended them, teaches us that it is not only a duty, but a privilege, frequently to unite in social prayer, on other days besides the Sabbath. As to the seasons of family and secret prayer, it is a- bundantly evident from Scripture, we should be frequent and habitual in the performance of these duties. This we are taught by the exhortations to pray always^ to con- tinue in prayer, and to continue instant in prayer. And the Scriptures also teach, that we should perform these duties dailru and not only daily, but at least morning and evening. The Psalmist said, " Every day will I bless thee ;" Ps. cxlv. 2. '" Unto thee will I pray. My voice shalt thoa hear in the mornings O Lord ; in the morning ■will 1 direct my prayer unto thee, and will look up ;" Ps. V. 2. 3. " It is a good thing to give thanks unto the Lord — To show forth thy loving-kindness in the morning., and thy faithfulness every night ;''"' Ps. xcii. 1, 2. Yea the Psalmist was still more frequent in his devotions. For "vve hear him saying ; '•''Evening and morning., and at noon will I pray ;" Ps. lv. 17. Daniel prayed in his house three times a day. The daily sacrifices under the law afford us some light on this subject. They were of- fered morning and evening. From all this evidence vcidy be inferred, that family and secret prayer ought each to be performed at least twice in each day, that is, morning and evening. And reason seems lo point us to prayer, at least morning and evening. It is reason- a!)le that we should begin the day with God, thank him for the preservation and mercies of the night, and ask his presence and blessing through the day. And it is e- qually reasonable that we should end the day with him, and commit ourselves to his care through the night. The division of time into day and night seems to point us to the duty of prayer, morning and evening. THE KINDS AND SEASONS OF PKAVEK. 53'.i For eJRCulatory prayer, there are no stated seasons. Frequently through the day, when in company, or when engaged in our ordinar> business, we may Hft up our hearts to God. This kind of prayer, says one, enters heaven sooner than any other. It is divested of that for- mahty which is apt to be attached to our other prayers, and flows warm from the heart. In the apphcation of this subject, we may reflect what a blessing is it, that we may pray in hope of accept- ance ! If we had our deserts, we should be shut out from the presence of God, and he would refuse to hear us. But instead of this he has erected a throne of grace, and invites us to come boldly to it, that we may obtain mercy and find grace to help in time of need. We ought with thankfulness to embrace the permission. We ought nev- er to feel prayer to be a task. We ought to esteem it a high privilege, and embrace it as such with deliglit. But alas ! how many are there w ho if they do pray, per- form it as a necessary task, to which they are driven by conscience! They perform it, in a heartless manner; and they are glad when they have finished it. Such can- not have the temper of God's children. For thei/ habitu- ally dehght in this duty ; and whenever they feel a back- wardness or coldness in the performance of it, they mourn. With David, they can say, " It is a good thing to give thanks unto the Lord ; to show forth thy loving-kindness in the morning, and thy faithfulness every night ;" Ps. xcii. 1, 2. But alas ! again, how many are there who neglect the duty of prayer altogether ! They lie down and rise up, and spend day after day, without praying to the great God, who has commanded them to pray to him, on whom they are continually dependent, from whom they receive all their blessings, and at whose disposal they entirely are. That there should be such persons in our world, possessed of reason, is astoiiishing, and shows the exceed- ing depravity of fallen mam All such persons must un- doubtedly be in the road to destruction. Prayerless per- sons are surely graceless persons. And they who will not call upon God now, but continue to neglect prayer^ will ere long call and will not be heard. Let prayerless persons take warning. It is the duty of every person, ofevery age and every ,'334 SERMON CVT. coiulition, to pray in secret ; and although they may ex- terfially join in the public prayers of God's house, or in the prayers which may be offered in the families, in which they reside ; and although ttiey may even lead in public or family prayer, yet if they habitually neglect secret prayer, they must be strangers to the grace of God. Are there any present who neglect secret prayer ? Whatever your profession may be, you have no Scrip- tural evidence that you are christians. You cannot be christians, and live in the habitual neglect of this du- ty. You can have no title to heaven; but must yet be in the gall of bitterness and the bond of iniquity. A- wake to a sense of your condition ; and this day go by yourselves, and begin to pray unto the Lord, and cry to him to have mercy upon you. And let no day pass with- out being in your closet, and on your knees before God. Are there here any heads of families who neglect family prayer ? You have heard that this is a duty. What ex- cuse can you offer to justify the neglect of this duty.'* Will you say, 1 am not a professor of religion ? But the neglect of one duty will not excuse for the neglect of an- other. Because you are not a professor of religion, has God no riglit to you, or your family ? Are you under no obligations to worship him ? Has he no right to your ser- vice ? And are you in no danger of his wrath, if you neg- lect his service ? How monstrously absurd ! But will you object again, I cannot find time ? Are you not a candidate for eternity ? And if so, what is the great and most important business of time ? Is it not to pre- pare for eternity ? And is not the care of your soul, and of the souls of your family, of more importance to you and them, than any thing else ? Nothing can have such a claim upon your time as religion. If therefore you are en- gaged in a business which forbids you to pray in your family, you ought without hesitation instantly to relin- quish it. " For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul ? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul ?" Mat xvi. 26. Will you say again, I know not how to pray? If you ■were impressed with a sense of your necessities as you ought to be, you would soon have enough to say. The beggar at your door knows how to let his wants be known, and to prefer his request for relief. If nothing more and THE KINDS AN© SEASONS OF PRAYER. 535* ■worse, pride, which is very criminal, lies at the foundation of this objection. Do you say again, I have so long neglected it that I am ashamed to begin ? You ought to be ashamed that you have so long neglected it ; but you ought not to be a- shamed to correct, what you have reason to be asham- ed of Do you object again, my family will not join with me ? But are you not, or ought you not to be the master of your own house ? And have you fairly made the experi- ment whether your family will submit to such a regula- tion ? And should they oppose, whom are you to obey, them or God ? There is in fact, my hearers, no excuse that will stand the test of reason, and much less of the bar of God, where you will shortly have to answer for your neglect of duty. If you felt as you ought to feel, these objections would ap- pear trifling. Are there here any heads of families who profess reli- gion, and yet neglect family prayer ? Such act entirely inconsistent with their profession. \i your neglect be known to the world, you are a great stumbling-block to those that are without ; and the authority of the church can be discharged from criminality in retaining you in the communion, only on the principle, that they are ignorant of your criminal neglect. But God knows it and he will soon reckon with you. Every head of a family, whether he professes religion or not, who neglects the duty of family prayer is called upon seriously to consider this subject, and no longer to continue in tliis neglect. You are practically denying the dependence of your family on God, and that as a 1am- ily you need any favours, or have received any, worthy of your gratitude. Consider all the reasons which have been oflered to establish this duty, and especially con- sider your great responsibility, in having the interests of the immortal souls of your children and domestics com- mitted to your care. Do you love your children ? and can you bear the thought that they should be lostt!irou2:h your neglect.'^ The guilt of that parent, in whose skirt'^ the blood of the souls of his children shall be found, in the great day of account, must be great, and his doom dreadful indeed ! And there is very great reason fo frtu' 536 aERMON €VII. that the children of prayerless families will be lost. For God will pour out his fury upon the families that call not on his name. How will you bear to meet your children at the bar of God, and hear them tell you, heaping curses upon your heads, that it was through your neglect, they lost their souls ? How will you bear to spend an eterni- ty with them in misery, under such reflections and impre- cations ? Heads. of families, in whose houses there is no domestic altar, and who never collect your children a- round you, and pray to God with them and for them, go and seriously reflect upon this subject. SERMON CVII. THE lord's prayer. MATTHEW VI. 9 13. '-'•After this manner therefore^ pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven^ hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy icill be done on earthy as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our debts., as we for- give our debtors. And lead us not into temptation, but de- liver us from evil : For thine is the kingdom, and the pow- er, and the glory, for ever. — AmenP "We know not, what we should pray for as we ought ;" Rom. viii. 26. We need therefore to ask of Christ, as one of his disciples did, "Lord, teach us to pray;" Luk. xi. 1. We need direction from above ; and the Lord has been graciously pleased to give us the needed direction, to which it becometh us diligently to attend. The rule of direction we have pointed out in our Cate- chism in the answer to the 90th question : '•'WJiat rule hath God given us for our direction in prayer? The whole word of God is of use to direct us in prayer ; hut the special rule of direction is that form of prayer, which Chrifff ta^'i^hf his disciples^ commonly called the LorcPs prayerJ'^ THE lord's prayer. 537 The word of God generally is of use to direct us in prayer. It teaches us our necessities and duty, and what things are agreeahle to the will of God, for which we may pray. It teaches us, for our encouragement, the character of God, as a sin-pardoning, and a prayer-hearing God, ready to bestow upon those who ask him, the blessings they need. It contains also, for our encouragement, ma- iiv precious promises which we may plead in prayer, and examples of answers to prayer. And it furnishes us with many petitions, used by others in situations similar to our own, which we may use and make our own. An acquaint- ance with the word of God, will therefore be found of great use, to direct and assist us in prayer ; and it be- comes us to study it, that we may know for what, and how to pray. But while the word of God generally is of use to direct us in prayer, we have a special rule of direction in that form of prayer, which Christ taught his disciples, com- monly called the Lord's prayer. This undoubtedly may be used as a prayer. But that it was intended to be a directory by which to frame our prayers, rather than a form, to the express words of which, we are obliged to be confined, appears from several considerations. 1. From the manner in which it is introduced in our text ; " After this manner, therefore pray ye," which seems clearly to be an intimation, that it was intended to be, rather a directory, after the wiawwcr of which prayers were to be framed, than a form of words to be used with- out variation. It is true that Luke introduces this prayer in different words. " When ye pray say, " Our Father, &c, ;" Luk. xi. 2. But as Matthew has given this prayer much more fully than Luke, we have reason to believe, that, " When ye pray, say," in Luke, means the same, as " After this manner pray ye," in Matthew. 2. If this prayer was intended to be, not a directory, but a precise form, we should have had it in the same words in both Matthew and Luke. These two are the only evangelists who have recorded this prayer ; and the time when it was spoken, as recorded by Luke, was evi- dently diiFerent from the time when it was spoken as re- corded by Matthew. If therefore our Lord had intended that it should be used as a form instead of a directory, it VOL. ij. 68 538 SERMON GVII. is reasonable to suppose, that when he spake it the sec- ond time, he would have used precisely the same words, as he did the first time ; but this is not the case. In some petitions, different words are used, though the sense is retained ; and a part is entirely omitted. In Matthew the fourth petition is, "Give us this day our daily bread ;" in Luke it is, " Give us day by day our daily bread." In Matthew the fifth petition is, " Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors ;" in Luke it is, " Forgive us our sins ; ibr we also forgive every one that is indebted to us." And the last sentence, according to Matthew ; "For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for- ever. Amen," is entirely omitted by Luke. From this variation we infer, that the Lord's prayer was not intend- ed to be used as a precise form, but principally as a di- rectory in prayer. 3. We have no proof that the apostles used this form of prayer. For it is no where said in the New Testa- ment that they did : although we have several of their prayers recorded, and although they kept themselves within the limits of this directory. But while we believe and maintain that we are not bound to use the Lord's prayer as a form, in its pre- cise words ; yet we allow, that it is proper to use it, either by itself, or as some do, to begin or conclude other prayers with. But while it is thus used, it ought to be done with understanding and reverence ; and we ought carefully to guard against all formality, and all superstitious use of it, as though there was a merit in using it, and as though there was a charm in the words to procure blessings, apart from the temper of heart, with which the words are pronounced. But while we hold that we are not bound to use this prayer as a form, we hold it to be an important di- rectory, to which it becomes us to take heed ; and a very comprehensive summary of the matter proper to be used in prayer. In the remainder of this discourse, I will endeavour to explain the meaning of the several parts of the Lord's prayer. It consists of three parts, viz. a preface, petitions, and conclusion. I. The preface,—^' Our Father which art in heaven.''* This preface of the Lord's prayer, according to our THE lord's prayer. 539 Catechism " teacheth us to draw near to God with all holy re- verence and confidence^ as children to a father^ able and ready to help us^ and that ive should pray with and for others.'''' In this preface we are tanglit, that we ought to begin our prayers, with making mention of the name of God, and someof his divine perfections ; that we ought to addres3 )iini with reverence, under a sense of the infinite distance that there is between us and him, as he is not only our Father,but our Father in heaven^ infinitely exalted above us; and that we should approach him in prayer, in the way of the covenant of grace, relying upon the merits of Christ for pardon and acceptance, and with a filial temper; for it is only in the covenant of grace, which is made in and through Christ, that God is to the sinner a reconciled God and Father ; and it is certain that he is the covenant God and Father of none but those who are reconciled un- to him, and have a filial temper. This preface further teaches us that the people of God may and ought to ap- proach him with a humble confidence,as children come to a good Father, able and ready to help them. For if God be our Father, it certainly belongs to his character, to listen to the requests of his children, and to grant them as far ae they are tor their good. Further, this preface teaches us the duty of social pray- er. We are not only to pray, each one by himself in se- cret, and say, my Father ; but we are also to pray to- gether and say " our Father." II. We proceed to the second division of the Lord's prayer, viz. the petitions., which are six. 1. The first \% ^'' hallowed be thy name.'''' In this petition *' We pray that God would enable iis and others to glorify him in all that whereby he maketh himself known, and that he would dispose of all things to his own glory.'''' By the name of God, we are to understand himself, as made known to us, in all the ways in which he manifests his character : as by his names properly so called, titles, attributes, ordinances, words, and works. By hallowing the name of God, we are to understand, sanctifying, honour- ing, or glorifying Go 1 himself In this petition therefore we are taught to pray, that God may be glorified in all whereby he maketh himself known ; and as he maketh himself known by all his works, we are here taught to pray that he would dispose of all things for the advance- ment of his own glory ; and that he would by his grace en,- 54(J SERMON CVli. able us and others, willingly and actively to glorify him ; arul that therefore he would enable us and others to hate and forsake sin, which robs God of his glory: to believe in, admire, adore, and love him, and thus glorify him in heart ; to speak forth his praise, and thus glorify him with the tongue; and to obey his commandments and thus glorify him in the conduct of our lives. And here it is worthy of observation that this pe- tition, that God's name may be hallowed, is placed first, which may teach us, that the glory of God should be our first and chief object, to which every other ought to be subordinate. And here we may further re- mark ; how inconsistent, and wicked is the conduct of many ! They pretend to pray to God ; and run over the Lord's prayer, and using this petition, pray that his name may be glorified, andyet constanly dishonour him with their hearts, their lips, and their lives; and while they pretend to pray that he may be glorified, at the same time do almost all that they can to dishonour him themselves, and to lead others also to do the same. 2. The 5ccon(/ petition is, " thy kingdom come'''' In this peti- tion, " we pray that Satan^s kingdom may be destroyed^ that the kingdom of grace may be advanced, ourselves and others brought into it and kept in it, and that the kingdom of glory may be has- ienedy By the kingdom of God here, for the coming of which we are to pray, we are not to understand the kingdom of his providence ; for this was already come when Christ spake tliis prayer ; but his spiritual kingdom, or the king- dom of grace and glory, which our Saviour very fre- quently called the kingdom of God, and the kingdom of heaven. The kingdom of grace has already come in part; but still it is proper to pray that it may come more fully and gloriously. Satan has usurped a dominion in this world ; hf is called the prince of this world, and he rnleth iw the hearts of the children of disobedience. The kf)2:(lom of God, and of Satan, ?^7« directly opposed to each other, and the kingdom of Go^'s grace has been set up in our world on purpose to destroy the kingdom of Satan. '1 hcrefore in praying, " thy kingdom come," we pray that Satan's kingdom may be destroyed, in our own hearts, and the hearts of others throughout the world. We pray that the grace of God may ride, abound, and in- THE lord's PRAYEfe. 511 crease in our hearts ; and that every thing; which is op i«o- sile to it, in our hearts or hvcs, may be put down and taken away. We pray also, that the gospel may have free course where it is preached ; that they who are out of the kiitg- dom of Christ may be brought in ; that all his peoplo may be abundantly replenished with his grace, and bring forth holy fruit to his glory ; that the gospel may be sent \v .ere it is i]ot ; that all the means using for the spread ot the gospel may be prospered; that Pagan idolatry, Jewish in- fidelity, Mahometan delusion, and Popish superstition may come to an end ; that the Sun of Righteousness may arise upon these benighted p^irts of the earth with heali.g in his wings ; and that the glorious millennial period, when the kingdoms of this world shall hecome the kiig- doms of our Lord and of his Christ, and the earth shall he filled with the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea, may speedily come. hi this petition we also pray that the kingdom of glory may be hastened ; or that the day of the complete tri- imiph of Christ over all his enemies, when the chun h sli dl pass from its militant to its triumphant state, may speedily come. " Surely I come quickly," says Christ. And every christian ought to respond; "Amen. Even so, lome Lord Jesus ;" Rev. xxii. 20, 21. 3. The /'/im/ petition is, '" ih)/ icillbe done on earth as it is in heaven^ In this petition, " tve praij that God by his grace ivou/d make us able and willing to knoiv^ obcy^ and submit to his will in all thini{s as the ani^els do in heaven.'''' By the w?/// of God here, we are to understand, that which he requires of us to do, and that which he pleases to do with us. And this petition teaches us to pray, that we may become acquainted with the will of Cod; that knowing his will we may have a desire and disposition to do whatsoever he commands, and strength to act accor- ding to the desires and resolutions of our hearts ; and that we may without murmuring and with patience and resigna- tion bear and submit to his will, when he pleases to chas- tise us. And we are further taught in this petition to pray that we may know, obey, and submit to the will of God, witli the same temper, and in like manner, as saints and angels in heaven ; that is with the like humility, cheer- fulness, faithfulness, diligersce, zeal, sincerity, and con- stancy. And we are further taught to pray, not only that 542 tiERMWiV CVII, the will of God, may thus be known obeyed, and submit ted to by us ; but also by the whole earth. 4. The fourth petition is," give us this day our daily bread.'''' In this petition, " we pray, that of God's free gift we tnay re- ceive a competent portion of the good timngs of this life^ and en- joy his blessing with theniy In this petition we are taught, to acknowledge our con- stant dependence on God, lor every temporal comfort ; that every temporal blessing we receive, is a free unmeri- ted gift from him ; that we are to ask, not for abundance, but for a competency, or for daily bread ; and that having food and raiment, or a competency of temporal blessings M'e should be thankful and contented. 5. The fifth petition is, " and forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors.^'' In this petition, " we pray, that God, for Christ'' s sake, ivould freely pardon all our sins which we are the rather encouraged to ask, because by his grace we are enabled from the heart to forgive others''' By debts in this petition, we are to understand sins. — In this petition we acknowledge ourselves sinners, deser- ving of the wrath of God, and unable to pay the dread- ful debt we owe to divine justice, and that therefore we lie at mercy and seek forgiveness. And since it is abun- dantly evident from the word of God that forgiveness is of- fered and extended to the sinner, only through Christ, in this petition we ask, the forgiveness of our sins through the merits of Christ, and acknowledge the sacrifice which be has made for sin. In this petition we are taught the importance and necessity of praying with a temper of for- giveness towards our fellow men, who may have injured or offended us ; and we are taught to use our forgiveness of others, as an argument, why we should be forgiven ; and to expect forgiveness from God, only as we forgive our fellow men. This petition by no means implies, that tlierc is any merit in forgiving others, entitling us to for- giveness from God ; but only that we are hence encoura- ged to hope that we have the disposition, suitable to re- ceive forgiveness, as a free favour from the hands of God. Neither does this petition imply that every person who forgives shall be forgiven; but only that those who forgive from right motives, may from hence take encouragement to hope that God will forgive them.— This petition further teaches us, that they who pray THE lord's prayer. to God, while they hold anger, malice, and revenge, to- wards any of their fellow men, or refuse to forgire them, have no just ground to expect that God will hear or forgive them. Tliis is confirmed by other declarations of our Saviour. " If ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you; but if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father for- give your trespasses;" Mat. vi. 14, 15. And again, " When ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have ought a- gainst any ; that your Father also which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses. But if ye do not forgive neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses ;" Mark xi. 25. 26. Hence it is evident that if we do not pray with a forgiving temper, we can have no Scriptural ground to hope that the Lord will hear or forgive us. And every time we say the Lord's prayer with an unforgiving temper, and holding malice against any ; or every time we make a prayer conformable to the Lord's prayer with such a temper, we do virtually pray for our own perdition. And how, my hearers, can we dare to lift up our faces to God, and ask him to for- give us, to speak in the language of the parable, the ten thousand talents we owe him, when we refuse to forgive our brother, the ofTences which he has committed against us, which are in comparison as nothing ? 6. The sixth petition is, '• and lead us not into temptation ; hut deliver us from eviV In this petition, " we pray that Godivoidd either keep us from being tempted unto sin or sup- port and deliver us when we are tempted.^'' # This petition supposes, that we are exposed (o tempta- tion, and that God may justly leave us to be tempted to sin. And it is true that we are in a world, where we are exposed to many temptations, from the men and the things of the world, from the remaining corruptions of our own hearts, and from Satan the great adversary, who goeth a- bout like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour. This petition further supposes, that we are afraid of sin. and sensible of our own weakness to resist temptations. We therefore pray that God would not suffer us to be tempted to sin ; or that if he sees fit to permit us to be tempted, he would support us under temptations, keep ub from yielding to thcro. and give us grace tQ resist and e- 544 SERMON cvri. vercorae them, so that we may be delivered from the evil olsi/i. Jf/. The third part of the Lord's prayer is the conclusion. This is in ihe iollowing words, "/or thine is the kingdom^ the power and glory forever ; t^nien.'''' This conclusion " teacheth us, to take our encouragement in prayer from God only, and in our prayers to praise him, ascribing the kingdom^ pon er^ and glory to him, and in testimony of our desire, and assurance to be heard, tve say, anient This conclusion teacheth us to derive all our encour- ao^oment in prayer, not from any worthiness in ourselves, but from God alone. This is implied in the word for, with which this conclusion begins. That kingdom, for the coming of which we have prayed, is the Lord's, and there- fore we are encouraged to hope that he will set it up, and maintain it in the world. All power is his, and therefore he is able to fulfil all our petitions. The glory, for the manifestation and advancement of which we have prayed is his, and therefore we hope that he will hear us and glorify himself And as he can hear all our requests, for ourselves, which are according to his will, revealed in his >vord, consistently with his own glory ; and glorify himself by granting them, we iiope that he will hear and answer us. This conclusion further teaches us, that it is our du- ty, in our prayers, to mingle praises to God, and ascribe to liim the glory due to his name. The word " Amens^ with whicli the Lord's prayer concludes, signifies either, so be it, or so shall it be, and probably both ; and thus ex- presses botii(|Our desire, that what we have prayed for, may take place, and our hope and confidence that it will. From what has been said we may now remark, that none but those whose hearts are renewed, can rightly say the Lord's prayer, or make a prayer which contains the same sentiments. Who, but one who has a heart reconciled to God, can call him his Father.^ Is it not mocking God, to say •' hallowed be thy name,'' and yet care nothing for his glory; but daily dishonour him, and profane his name?' Is it not totally inconsistent to pray " thy kingdom come, and will be done on earth as it is in heaven," when they who otfer up these petitions belong to another kingdom, at open war with this, and are totally opposed to the kingdom of God, and neither do, nor desire to do his will ? [Tow can thD?f: ask arisrht for dailv bread, who neither THE LORD'S PRAYEK. 3-15 feeltheir dependence on God, nor feel thankful for his mer- cies? Is it not absurd to ask the pardon of sin, and then rush immediately into it ? And to ask to be forgiven as they tbrgive, when perhaps their hearts are filled witli en- mity towards a fellow creature ? And is it not inconsis- tent, to pray to'be kept out of the way of temptation, and then run wilfully into it ? Let these questions be duly considered by those who have used this, or any other prayer containing the same sentiments, in a careless manner. Let them carry con- viction to their minds, of the sinfulness of their conduct. And let them, not relinquish prayer, but be careful to pray aright, and to live according to the sentiments ex- pressed in their prayers. I have now, my brethren, finished a course of sermons on the leading doctrines and duties contained in the word of God, and arrariged in the order of our excellent Cate- chism. It has pleased God to spare my life to finish them, for which I desire to thank him. These sermons have been profitable to myself, and I hope and believe that my labour has not been in vain to my people ; but that under them there has been a considerable increase of religious knowledge, and some fruits of real holiness. And I hope that seed has been sown which though it may seem for a time to lie buried in dust, will eventually produce an abundant harvest. Let me remind you, my hearers, that you must soon render an account to God for these, and all other sermons which you have heard. A number, who began these sermons with us, are now in the eternal world. We also must soon be there. Let us therefore be diligent in improving the means with which we are privileged, that we may be enabled to give an account of our steward- ship with joy, — Amen & Amex. FLNIS DATE DUE CAYLORD PHINTED .N U S A. ^m^^l^mmmm^ t"^' '■■•. "<*■:«"":