\^^%C^ it^K 1}- i/ u c^r^ne. **> O-r-c: .^ ^:. 'y.^ Bnit)e?(al 3R.eftitutton a This prov'd in feveral Letters WROTE ON THl Nature and Extent of Christ's Kingdom: ' WHEREIN The scripture PASSAGES, Falfly alleged in Proof of The Eternity of Hell Torments, Are truly tranflated and explained. Ei J'f 01 rug UuB'pOdTiVOV? OtXOU? ^KZtp^lipOVTliy B'OiVXTU XXTX- ^txa^ovraj ; voa-ca f^xXKov oi rriv X^tra Si^eumxXiav vod'£vsiv ettj- p^£ipoui/Tf?, aiuvixv licrov(ri J'»xl]^, V7np rig fxvpov x) ^xvutov vtts- fASivtv Kv^tog Iria-ag, o ts 0fou /Aovoyfujf vlog', « T37V ^i^acfiia- 'OMOinZ AE xj Tra? a>^pcc) vlyfiKyr) - lo^uv wg XArtd^r, o£^x[xi]f(^. Ignatii Epift. ad Ephef. Sold by R. Dodsley, \t\ Pall-Mall^ London-, and T. Cadell, hi lP'J?:e-S!rr''L Bi'i^ro', MDCCLXI )^ ¥ )9( )fl( )!K )«( )^ )fi(*)^ )j(*)K ^^ya )K*^ )^*)«( ¥*^ )^*}^ -_, THE Subject of each Letter refpedively. LETTER I. Page cr'HE Englijh words eternal, everlajling, for- ■*■ ever, ^c. are unfcriptural, and exprefs not the true import of the original words aon, olem [aiwu oSv] --.---. I } ,5TTER II. — The kingdom of Chrift which is caWd aonian [«iwv»^] is not eternal ----- 2| Letter III. — Chrift'j kingdom what, and where it is, and when it began -------^4 Letter IV. — ChriftV kingdom will confift of many fuccejfive parts or periods -------64 Letter V. — The term Ionian [«tww(^] applied to the word spirit, imports not that he is eternal - 78 Letter VI. — Logos, the only begotten fon of God, is the true aonian fpirit [aiw^joi/ 7rvivy,oi] and di- JiinSi as fuch from the father 105 Letter VII. — Farther remarks on Chrift'j aonian character, imply i7ig his perfonal dijlin^ion before injifled on. - 118 As touching asonian reftitution wrought by Chrift, Letter VIII. — God wills effectually that all men floall be refiored ii^fj, Letter IX. — Of the explicit and implicit will of God ------------144 Lettir The Subject, l^c. Page Letter X. — Chrift in his character of a rejlorer ( sioma.n aiuvii^) con^dered aHarge - - - i6o Letter XI. — The property «f Qhri^k. as redeemer may be doomed to i^onianfufferings - - - - 20S Letter XII. — The do£lrine of an univerfal recon- cilement to God in Chrift, excludes not that of the damnation of the wicked [£»? rov a»wv«] ceonianly - 229 Letter XIII. — The efficacy of Chn{^' s facrifce mufi extend to all his creatures - - - - - - -244 Letter XIV. — The extent of the promife (Rev. xxi. 4) that death fhall be no more - - - - 2yo Letter XV. — In Chni^: the frji fruits, the whole creation is deem' d holy before God - - - - 293 Letter XVI. — Apaffagein the epijile to the He- brews (viz.Q\\. ii. 8, 9.) confider'd: and the fallen angels compared with fallen men - - - - -318 The fcripture paffages objetfled againft the doftrinc of univerfal reftitution from 2Cor. iv. 17. 1 fXVII. -337 I Tim.i. 17. I I XVIII. 345 Matt. XXV. 46. I i XIX. 358 Eph. iii. 10. >confidcred in Letter's XX. - 367 Heb. xiii. 20. j j XXI. 382 Matt. xxvi. 4. j j XXII. 394 Heb. ii. 16. J LXXIII.411 jfjT The Quotations in the learned languages, found in the notes, are all tranflated into Engliftx at the end of ths book, as are the other quotations in the text. Univerfal Reftitution, ^c. LETTER I. 'That the EngUfi words eternal^ everlajiingy Jor ever and ever, &c, are wifcriptural^ and exprefs not the true import of the original words [oam cs^j;) aeon olem. c*oo$oc^o$oo$oo!^o$3c^c$oo$o:$oc$oc$oc$oo5cc$oc^ T O S I R, !9(^^MHAT I have to advance upon this great hV ^^S ^^"^^^5 ^h^ Restitution of all things, >^^^^ will be drawn moftly from two corifi- derations. ift. From a confideration of the kingdom of God to be eftablifhed by divine management in tlie perfon of the God-man Chrijl yefus : And 2dly from a confideration of the pre- fent fallen nature and difpofition of the creature; but more immediately of the human foul. Thefe two points will divide my enquiries into two parts, the fivd of which will refpedl the king- dom of God. But as preliminary hereto I mult begin with Vv'hat I take to be the true import of A 2 the Letter I. [ 4 ] Sect. I. the words 0*?^ olem and «»w!/ son, the foundation of the miftake I have fo often complained of. SEC T. I. The word ^y)^ olem, its meaning and force. ^HE word EisSvolem (or^iSiV owlem) which T the Septuagint tranllate (wherever it refpeds time) by the greek word «'wv (and which tranflation feems to have been the occafion of the frequent ufe of that word oc-m afterward among; the greek chrif- tians) it is well known, is ufually in our Old, a« is alfo the word aiwv in our New Teftament, ren- der'd by the englifli words eternal, everlafting, and without end j but how juflly is the queftion in debate. This word EdS;; olem among the Hebrews (ig- nified as a verb to hide, to conceal, to referve in darknefs and fecrecy'j as a noun, uncertain, Inde- iinite, undetermined, undeclared ^ and confequent- NOTE S. ^^'hus Job xxviii. 21. it is hid (A£A-/i9< r"i::Sp it liideth itfelf ) from the eyes of all living, and kept clofe from the fo-ivls of the air, Eccl. xii. 14. God fhall bring every ivork to judgment -with every fecret thing, (E^^p '^) whether it be good or whether it be evil. Pf. x.4|. V/hy Jlandefl thou afar off, Lord, why hi deft thou thyfelf {^*hv^) if^ iinie of troubled So Lev. iv. 13; V. 2, 3, 4. Nmn. xv. 13. 2 Kings \v. I'j. Job xHi. 3. Lam. iii. c6. Nah. iii. 11. i Kings %. 3. Prov. xxvWi. 27. If. i. 15. Pf. xliv. 21. Letter I. [ 5 ] Sect. I. ly, applied to a perfon it means an uncertain indeterminate perfon ''j and applied to time (its only ufe which at prefent concerns us) an inde- finite, undeclared, tho' very long, time." The word cnui/ among the Greeks fignified in its genuine meaning an age or fo long as very old men live, a term of about an loo years; yet fome- times the Greeks applied it to a much longer term than an looyears, andfometimes toafhorterterm": Sothat the word <»'wv aioncorrefponds tolerably with the NOTES. ^ I Sam. xvii. /^6. And the king /aid enquire thou whofe fon this unknown perfon (sSj;n m i. e. "iJ'^rT fee v. ^■^.) is. Gen. xxiv. 43. Behold IJlmtd by the well of '•Jiater^ and it fhall come to pafs that when that unknown woman (PL^'jjn i. e. nc'K fee v. 40.) cometh forth to draw wa- ter and I fay unto her, ISc. « Ex. xii. 14. And you fn all keep this day a feafi hy an ordinance i^jy^') of long undetermined antiquity. If Ixi. 4. And ye floall build up the defolations (w^i^' ewlem) of long undetermined antiquity . Jer. xxv. 9. Iwill bring Nebuchadnezar againji this land, a?id againji the na- tions round about, and will d'^Jlroy them utterly and make them deferts (sS^j; owlem) of long undetermined antiquity. Mich. ii. 9. J he women of my people (of Judah) have ye (Ifraelitcs) caft out from their pleafant houfes, from their children have ye taken away 'my glory {z^'^1^'^)for an age or long undetermined feafon. «• aiwi/ fignifies the fpace of an 100 years, thqlthe deftrudion of the Jews foretold Mat. xiii. 40. 9 "^'^ o-j-^lcKcix Tn aiojK^ TjfTs") came to pafs before 50 Years. Sc&Leigh\ Critica Sacra upon the word ay.-j; and 'Tully it fecms renders this greek word by the lathi \vor(^ yinnus a year, ar.d by Scciilum an age. Letter I. [ 6 ] Sect. I. the word sS]; olem in its ufe, tho' not in its natu- ral import J for tho' a»wv aeon fignifies, not as s*?;? olem hidden, cover'd, concealed, indefinite, un- afcertained, yet as applied to time it denotes, what is very like this, a long tho' undetermined portion or period of time. SECT. IL 'T'he wcrd ['x.-u''') ineam not eternity. HOWEVER that the word aiwj/ son, even in the fcripturc acceptation of it, cannot iignify, what we moderns mean by the word eternity, ■will appear for the following reafons. Firji^ Becaufe fuch meaning of it is in many Inllances repugnant to other parts of fcripture^ fo 2 Cor. iv. 4. In whom the God t« muvoi; rara of this aon has blinded the minds of them that believe not^ &c. Now fuppoling the word seon to mean age and not eternity", Satan may here be aptly exhibited NOTE S. * Since the words atwv uiccu:^ t^Sj? ^h'^p olem owlem have no word in the E}igJifrJ language that will anfwcr their ufe, I Ihall beg leave, as I fliall have oc- cafion, to make ufe of the words a?on reonian to ex- prefs them. Alfo as the word eternity in the modern notion of it (tho' not in its natural import) means a perpetuity endlefs and never ceafing, I fhall hence forward mean thus .much by the terms eternal and eternity. Letter I. [ 7 ] Sect. IL exhibited to us in this grand and horrible dcfcrip- tion of him, the god of this age, or aeon; but it were blafphemy to call him the god of eternity, beiides the abfurdity of ftiling him the god of thii eternity; for the word this fo ufcd muil: imply fome other eternity beiides the prefent, and twa ^ernities are an inconliftency in terms. Again, Epb. vi. 12. JVe wrejile not againji fleJJj and blood — but againji the rulers of the dark- nefs T8 xmvoq TBT-d of this ceon. But tranllate the word son here eternity, and this palTage would be, againji the rulers of the darknejs of this eternity, fo I Cor. i. 20. Where is the wife, ivhere is the fcribe, where is the difputer Ta ocmvo? Tsra of this ceoUy. and not of this eternity ; i Tz'/w. ii. 6. Charge them that are rich iv tw vjv utmi in the now aon^ (not in the now eternity) that they be 7iot high^ minded^ &c. fo Tifn. ii. 12. T^hat denying ungod- linefs and worldly lufts wefiould live fiber ly, righte- oujly and godly iv ru i/ui/ aiwn in the now aon; fo Mat. xiii. 22. The feed among the thorns is, he that heareth the word and the care ru atuvog r^r'^ of this ceon (not of this eternity) and the deceitfidnefs of riches, clooke the word and he becometh unfruitful, &c. For what common fenfe can endure that the word cciui, aeon in thefe places fhould be thus render'd by the word eternity? ^ Secondly y. NOTES. The term xiuv infcrtpture no fubfiilute for the term xaa-fji.);. *■ T H E tranflators of our New Teftament, fcnfiblc of this abfurdity, have render*d the word oauv agp in thefe places (as if a fubditute or fuccedanum for Letter I. [ ^ ] Sect. II. Secondly^ That the word aiwi- does not lignify eternity is alio clear, becaufe there was a time before NOTES. }£0(r/x(^) by the word world ; viz. The rulers of this («iwv) world, the difputers of this (ociuv) world, the rich in the prefent (aiwv) world, &c. But without reaching the intention of the fcripture, for it is the age and not the world which the fcripture every where complains of. The worldly inhabitants of the prefent age are wicked, but the worldly inhabitants of a future age fliall be righteous. The ruler of darknefs in (i. e. the dark ruler of) this age is Satan, the ruler of a fucceeding age, even upon this world of ours, will be JefusChriJi. So that the cares of this jeon are the cares of the people of this age-, and a conformity to this a^on is a conformity to the people of this age, &c. And fo f;? Tov aiwva, tho' it may be render'd phrafeologically as long as the world ftands, yet in its true force it mean: as long as the age (that is the great age of wickednels which comprehends many other leifer ages of the fame kindj endures. This world will weather out many ages, and that not only the ages of rebellion, but alfo ages of godlinefs and peace. To fuppofe therefore the word osjwi/ peonage, to be equivocal with the word xocij.oz kofmos world, is without farther proof unreafonable : But befides this, and befides that v/e have no precedent for tranflating it fo out of any of the G;v>(A¥(^) Jince the {eon (i, e. the great comprehenfive ason) began. A&s'\\\.2i. Spoken by the mouih of his holy prophets («7r' aw^^ Jince the €eon began. 'John ix. 32. (« ts u.\mo(i) Jince the eeon bigan^ was it not heard that^ ^c. And in the fame B fenfc NOTES. Thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory (« ? tkc aima^) to the worlds. John vi. 15. He that eateth of this bread jhall live («i? tov atwva) to the world, ch. xi. 20. He Jhall not die (ek tov a:wKx) to the world. Heh. xiii. 8. Jefus Chrift the fame yejlerday, to day (>t»j fif ts? ctimxq) and to the worlds. Rom. xiv. 11. The fmoke of their torments afcendeth up (£i? ajw:/« a»wvw^) to a world of worlds. Heb. xiii. 20. 57?^ God of peace who thro* the blood (^ja3-»i>«i? aiwi/jou) of the worldly covenant. Mat. xix. 16. 5^i6^ nV^ man fays to our Lord, what Jhall I do to have {C^unv ociuvm) worldly life, i Tim. vi. 12. Fight the good fight of faith^ lay hold on (a«wi/t» ^o.*)?) worldly life. John xii. 25. He that hateth his life {iv Tw xoo-juw ralw) in this world, Jhall keep it (fic C^un* atwuoi/) to worldly life. Rom. xvi. 26. /According to the commandment (ra ajwws fi£») of the worldly God. Heb. ix. 14. Chrift who {^kx, Trvsvfji.oiTog a uuts) through the worldly Jpirit offered himfelf to God, i^c. But what common fenfe will admit of the ftrange impertinence of the above tranflations of the terms So that unlefs wc claim a like ufe of the word JEon as is related of a nofe of wax, which its owner could convert and transform at pleafure, its vulgar tranfla- tions (namely world, eternal, &c.) muft be renounced. Letter I. . [ io ] Sect. 1L Tenfe are ufedaeons, ages, in theplural number; e.g. I Cor. ii. 7. Thehidde?! inyjiej-yof God pre-ordain d -Ztnto his glory (•^po twu aiwvwi/) before the ceom bega?t^ which no?iC of the princes (t» (3:jwj/(^ rsra] of this ao?t 'Jzncw. Eph. iii. 9. T'he myjiery which has been hid inGoB (oi-n-o Twv ffAuimv)from the beginni?2g oftheceons. Col. i. 26. T/3f myjkry that has been bid (-xtto twi» ^:wvwv ^ of,7ro ruv yBV£(>})/) Jrom the ccojis and the genera- tionSy, but now is made manijeft unto hisfai72ts. T^hirdly^ It is evident again, that the word aeon cannot fignify eternity, becaufe there are more aeons than one; whereas eternity, everlaftingnefs, and for ever, muft be an individual, as implying an unity of conliftenee, and limple continuance. Lz^y^vxx. 34. A?id ]tiws f aid unto them^ the chil- dren (tk aiwv^ Ta1a) of this a?on marry, and are given 'i?j marriage, but they which Jl: all be accounted wor- thy to obtain (fa aiwi/©^ £)t£n/«) that other aeon, and the refurreSfion from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage, &c. Here we find this and that, and confequently two aeons, a diftindiion obfervable in many parts of fcripture; fo 1 Cor. ii. 6. Tet not the wifdom ^T8 !x.'Mw<; -v^-a) of this ccon which comes to nought. Rom. xii. 2. Be not conform d (t« aiww rarw) to this aon. And in a like diftinguifhing fenfe, we often find mentioned the cares, the wifdom, the men, the ^things, the children (^a «,a>i/<^ t8t«) of this aeon ; all which imply that there mufl: be fome other aeon befide the prefent, and confequently more j^^' |^^k^/ JII-»-m.o') The prefent aEon therefore', as it began, fo will it alfo end ; and in its end be fucceeded by an a3on to unfold itfelf in a moft effential difference and dilTimilitude from the paft. Fifthly, From hence alfo it appears again, That the word (aiwv) aeon cannot mean eternity becaufe it muft end, and be no more; of which we have further allurance, Mat. xxviii. 20. And lo I am with you {TTxiTxg ruq r,^ifxz) all thc days, even to th& end (t» on'^vQi) cf tl^e aon. Mat. xiii. 29. the harve/l is the end (ra x^'xu©^) cf the (ton-, v. 40. Sofiall it be B 2 i'l JUETTER I. [ 12 ] Sect. III. in the end (tk enm(^ rars) of this aon. Mat. xxiv. 3, What fiall be thejign of thy comings and of the end /t8 a;«fc(^) of the aon. Sixthly, And not only son fingly and indefinite- ly, but (oj ajMvj?) the aeons plural, fliall alio have an end. Heb. ix. 26. But now once about (or to-* wards) the conclufion (or clofing up together) of the ^ons (f'j'i (nii/TiAsja Twi/ a wviwf) he ai>peardy to put away Jin by the Jacrifce of himfef. i Cor. x. 1 1 . And they were written for cur admonition upon whom the ends (rm aiw.wi/) of the aons are come. SECT. III. farther remarks upon the word («»wi') (;eon, THO' the word (aiwv) aeon to a curfory reader may feem only a trite familiar term of no other import than vulgar ufe has given it; yet if one critically obferves its variety, ufe, and acceptati- ons in fcripture; one may eafily fufpeSv vS ) to the age. That Heb. xiii, 8, he is the fame yejlerday^ to day^ and (^^-i.^) to the age ^ And that glory be to him (a? Tijj aiwi/a? twi/ ccjwvwvj to the ages of the ages. We NOTES. The true force of the jewifh (^^jb^^) Lolm^ rendered in Greek by £i? toi/ awfa. 2 IT is obferved by fome, and it feems very juftly,/ that the word toJ^^X among the Jews rendered in Greek by £*? toi/ x^w. was a fort of phrafe or jdiomatical exprefilon of common ufe to fignify at ran* dom a long doubtful time, as when we fay in englifh, while the world ftands. So we read i "John iii. 8. Peter faid thoufhalt never {iiq rov ccMva to the age) wajh my feet. Mat. xxi. 19. Let no fruit ^row on thee henceforth (ft? rov xiuux) to the age, or while the world ftands. John viii. 35. The fon ahideth in the houfe (viz. of his father, £»? rov awvyJ) to the age, or continually, or as long as he lives. John vi. 51. He that eateth this bread fh all live (a? toi/ aiwv«) tp the age, or continually, i Cor. viii. 13. If meat maketh my brother to offend, I will eat no flefh, (a? tov ciioovu) to the age, or continually, or while the world flandeth, leaf I make my brother to offend. John xii. 34. tVe have heard that Chrift abideth (ft? rov olmvx) to the age, or continually, i. e. without leaving the earth. Now if this be fo, the frequent application of the phrafe fc?> V ^ V ('or nq rov ajwv^s) to things truly seonian is very accountable; for in the hebrew and other eaft- crn languages we obferve a familiar ufe of the figure meiofis, whereby, as fay the rhetoricians. Res extenua- tur ultra verum, or fninus dicitur quam intelligitur-, that is, vv'hereby more is implied in an exprefTion than that expreilion naturally imports. Letter I. [ ^5 J Sect. III. We cannot underftand by the word son, fo ap- plied to thefe promifes, declarations, and doxolo- gies, any time fhort of eternity. But NOTES. So Rom, iv. 19. And being not weak in Faith ^ i^c. Here the extenuating term not weak, the apoftle ex- plains in the following verfe, as meaning (v. 20.) being Jlrong in faith. Rev. xii. 11. And they loved not their fouls unto death •, i. e. John xii. 25. And they hated their fouls unto death. Heb. xi. 16. Wherefore God is not afhamed to he called their God ; by the ex- prefTion not afliamed, we are here to underftand, that, i/! Ixii. 4. He is delighted to he called their God. So A5ls. xvii. 28. He (God) is not far from every one of us., for in him we live., and move., and have our being -, by the exprelTion not far from, we are to underftand moft intimately prefent with every one of us: But to illuf- trate this the better, I will here prefent to your view a few inftances of this vulgar jewifh phrafe ( in V >^ N^) lolm (that is, n? -rov onuux) to the age, in contraft with a few other Inftances ol the figure Meiofis in fcrip- ture ufe. The figure Meiofis ufed in The phrafe ^iiiji)^ (or uq Tov oiiuvcc) to the age. For in this phrafe, tho' itfelf ixpreffes only a lefs, intelli- gible, and decifive period; is imported yet a larger, unintelligible, and unde- termined period. /S^k ,\ ^. John iv. 14. He that drinketh of this water fhall not thirJijQi^jii^ioY f k tov The figure Meiofis ufed in terms, which tho' exprefs- ing only moderate and di- minutive particulars -, yet import particulars of a far larger and fublimcr nature. Other Injiances in con- traft. If xi. 28. Hafi thou, not known that the aonian God, fehovahy the creator Letter I. [ i6 ] Sect. Ill, But is not this cavilling rather than arguing ? If I was to fay, that tho' the word fmooth in its proper lignification does not denote roundncfs, yet NOTES. aiwva) to the age; that is to the utmoft limits of this prefent fecular ftate of our exigence, hereby however is imphed other fucceed- ing periods, ftiU far be- yond. John xiv. 1 6. That he (i. e. the comforter) may abide with you (ft? rov onmot.) to the age, i. e. and not only fo, but to periods unknown and .far beyond the age. Luke i. 33. And he Jhall reign over Jacob (a? rov amvoi) to the age, i. e. and not only fo, but to periods far beyond this, even con- tinualiy. John X. 28. J}:d they Jhall not periJJj («»? tvv qciu^vx) to the age, /. e. and not only fo, but alfo for pe- riods far beyond this, e- ven to the utmoft ^on. Mat. iii. 29. He that blafphemeth againfr the Holy Ghojl frjall not he forgiven^ (;E»* >ia' Vv? ^ft' Vif ^A!f ^fli' M^ 'v^ ^Rrf :iUi Xflr? ^A** \i<»' No* ^a/' vi^ \^ 55 qnb cHB ?nB Cp oCp qLP cnp 2up iCp -xp qCp ^ ecp S -nrir J I cjlablip fecidarly (or to a feculum, age) and his thro?ie as the days of heaven. Pf Ixxii. 5. They (i. e. the church) f:all revere thee as long as the fun and moon endureth, throughout all generations. V. 17. His name fiall be (^iIj^i^/'S) to the aeons, his name fl:all be continued as long as the fun. C 2 Now Letter I. [ 20 ] Sect. IV. Now fince thefe paflages, and many others of like cxpreffion, apply the eftablifliment of the fun, the duration of the moon, of the rainbow, of the days of heaven, of an age, and of the generati- ons of men, in order to illuftrate the continuance of the church of God, and of the feed of Christ and of his throne, and kingdom, and name, and glory, without fuppofing any alteration in nature, without fuppofing any unnatural continuance of fuch fun, moon, rainbow, age or days of heaven; why muft thefe things, viz. the throne, the king- dom, the name, the glory of Christ, becaufe of their eternal nature, have a different effed upon the words (sSy otm^) olm ^on, when applied to them? The duration of the fun, moon, and rainbow, is allowed to be only temporal, notwithftanding things of an eternal nature are compared to their continuance; why then may not the words !— S;? and ajoji/ retain the temporal import which is na- tural to them, notwithfianding they may therein be applied to eternal things ? Yea, and unlefs the terms olm and aeon Import a duration as far fhort of the word eternity, in our piodern notion of it, as is the duration of the fun, moon, rainbow and generations, which mufl all pafs away and reach their end; the holy writers miflead us in blending the exprefHons (aS;;"b ^^^-25^) lolm (i. e. £«? rov aium to the age) with the duration of the fun, moon, rainbow and generations, in one and the fame fentence, and as if terms of equal force; fince by fuch applica- tion they teach and unteach, averring the fame things Letter I. [ 21 ] Sect. IV. things to be of finite duration and of infinite du- ration in one and the fame line; for if it be need- ful to believe that our Saviour's throne and his church and his name as head of fuch fhall en- dure to all eternity, then is that a mifleading com- parifon which (hall date its perpetuity by the en- during of the fun, moon, rainbow^ and genera- tions, which all muft pafs away. And on the other hand, if it be not a point needful to be believed that the Lord's throne and church fhall continue to all eternity; then may we without fcruple declare aloud that the word (ajwv) ajon means not eternity, and that the idea of eternity can never be prov'd by the word ason in any form of it; and that whatever part of fpeech we may fhift it into, it can no more pro- nounce the eternity of any thing by becoming its adjund:, than the duration of the fun, moon, rainbow, or foundations of the world can pro- nounce the eternity of the fubjedl with which they, or any of them, may ftand in comparifon. Yea a man might with a more tolerable afTur- ance fuppofe the fun and moon to be eternal, than that the word aeonlan means eternal ; be- caufe the fcripture no where fays, in exprefs terms, that the fun and moon fhall pafs away, whereas it declares in exprefs terms that the earth (hall pafs away, and that on that earth fo to pafs away the feed of Abraham fliall have the land oi Canaan for an aeonian pofleflion. So Gen. xvii. 8. Ajid I Tk) ill give unto thee and thy feed after thee all the land of Canaan fcr an ceonian (O^U*) poffeffiony Gen. xiii. 15. (sS^;; i;*) even to an ceon (Ex. xxxii. 13- Letter I. [ 22 ] Sect. IV, 13. and they JJjall inherit it ceonianly i^^y^i) to en aon. If. Ix. 2 f . Ihey jhall inherit the land i^^yH) to an ceony Ezek. xxxvii. 25. and they fiall dwell therein, even they and their children, and their chil- drens children (i:»S it; 1^, ) even to an ceon, and my fervanf David fiall be their Prince (^h'lj;^) even to an ceon. But if after certain aeons are pafs'd away, 2 Pet. iii. 10. The heavens fijall pafs away with a great wife, and the elements fijall melt with fervent heat, the earth alfo and all the works that are therein fijali be burnt up-, what mufl then become of the asonian land of Canaan I* From the face of our Saviour, Rev. xx. 1 1 . The earth and heaven fiall jly away ; and will not the land of Canaan fly a- way with it ? Hov/ then will it be, or have been, an asonian pofTeflion to the feed of Abraham fup- pofing Ionian to mean eternal? When at the laft day, the flars fliall fall from heaven, and all the worlds we fee, ftarting from their fpheres, fliall crufh together in one vaft ruin, our little world will be loft in the immence combuftion ; and then mufl: the land of Ca?2aan alfo be no more. And if the land Gi Canaan will not be an eter- nal pofTciTion to the feed of Abraham, then nei- ther is it promifcd to be fo, and confequently the term iph"^) olm cannot mean eternal, but ftill it muft mean an asonian poUeffion : and as we have already iliewn that there are many sons,, and that thefe asons will fucceed one the other, and at laft will all of them have- an end, we muft fearch for the meaning of the word (o^jcovi©^) '£onios in time and not in eternity. LET- [23l LETTER IL Thaf the Kingdom (t/* C h r i s r njohkh is called ceonian^ is not eternal, T O SIR, jB!^^k.HE vulgar fenfe of the Greek words £ T r6 ^'^"^ aiww(^, &c. and as they are render- "*i^!^?^ ed in our englifli bibles eternal, everlafl- ing, for ever and ever, affording the moft prevailing argumento againft that beautiful truth, the Reftitution of all things, it was the bufinefs of my former letter to prove that thofc words are miftranllated. My next labour ought to be the afcertaining the true meaning of thefe words ; but this can- not well be done otherwifc than by a previous account of the kingdom of Chriji-, becaufe, as the diftinguifliing character of this kingdom is that it is ironian, the word aeon, in its feveral applica- tions throughout the fcriptures, will always allude to. Letter II. [ 24 ] Sect. L to, and bear fuch alliance and affinity with the kingdom of Chrijiy as that its notion and latitude will be determined by it. Thus indeed our tafk conliderably enlarges, yet, fince my work requires it, I will under- take it chearfuUy. And to obviate the error of Chrifi% kingdom being eternal, my firll point to prove muft be as follows : LETTER XL SECT L ChriflV aonian kingdom ^ill not be eternal, IT has been the ufual method with divines to prove the eternity of Chrifi\ kingdom from the words aeon and seonian (a*wy aiww(^) being fo often applied to it : and yet at other times, and on other occafions, they argue that the words aeon and asonian (a'W!' ««ww^) muft fignify eternal, becaufe fpoken of Chriji\ kingdom which, fay they, is eternal. Now if it can be proved that Chriji's kingdom is not eternal, it will follow that the words aeon and sonian [onuv atwvfi^) not only cannot be thus converted to thefe purpofes, but that the words themfelves muft import fome limited duration, for that Chrijf% kingdom is and will be jeonian is beyond difpute. The word eternal is ufed by divines to import a twofold duration, and muft therefore be con- lidered in its different acceptations, Eter- Letter II. [ 25 ] Sect. I. Eternity then ifl and in its ftridteft fenfe and propriety, imports duration abflradled from quan- tity and mutability i orexiftence altogether, with- out any flux or fucceiTion of parts prior or pofte- rior to each other: and this the fchools C2i\\ per- petuum nunCy perpetual now 5 others, unfucceflive duration or abfolute immutability. But lince eternal in this notion of the word cannot be applied either to the kingdom of Chriji, or to the land of Canaan, or to any other creature; we will conflder, 2dly, the word eternal as meaning duration in fucceffion, or as a feries of times infinitely protra6led ; an infinitely perpetuated chain of diftind; NOWS. Now in this account of the word eternal, the difficulty is that at the fame time that Chriji is de- clared the asonian God, and his kingdom the seon- ian kingdom, his gofpel alfo is ftiled the asonian gofpel. Rev. xiv. 6. and the land of Canaan is promifed to the 'Jews for an asonian pofl^effion. Gen. xvii. 8. which applications quite confufe the meaning of the term, fince we know not what to underfland determinately by this term fo differ- ently applied. If we are to underfland by the term asonian when applied to Chrifi the Ionian God, that he is of immutable duration ; we muft not un- derftand by the fame term, when applied to Cb'iji's kingdom, that this is not of immutable duration, but of infinitely progreffive duration. However, to connive at this, what are we far- ther to underfland by this term eternal when ap- plied to the gofpel, or to the jc-ivs ateinian inheri- tance in the land of Canaan/^ D To Letter II. [ 26 ] Sect. I. To the "Jeim is promiled the land of Canaan for an asonian pofleflion, and yet this land can nei- ther be of duration immutable, nor of duration in- finitely progrefTive; for it muft have an end when this world fhall be deftroyed. And the fame may be cbjedted to the asonian gofpel, fince the gofpel alfo, when its teftimony fhall be fuperfeded by our immediate vifion of Chrift^ (^nccrx^yvi^ni? ^c7^o•fw,',) the fifil: bcgottcn of cvcry creature, now his father's fubllitute and lieuten- ant, deliver up his vicarial and a-onian, or tem- porary power, together with all the fubjedts of it, to God, even the father; and become thencefor- ward, together with all the fubje«5ts of his now harmonizing kingdom, fubordinate, that is vo- luntarilv. Letter II. [ sO Sect. III. luntarily, as the complement of his defires and end of his miniftry, unto Godj that foGoD may be himfelf immediately the all in all, communi- cating himfelf in fullnefs to all his faints, and admitting them to an union with the Deity v/ith- out farther intercellion of the mediator. SECT. III. Christ's kingdom how without end, NO W to this doctrine is very reafonably objedted the pafTage in Luke i. 33. And of bis kingdom there Jl jail be no end. And to this we anfwer, that the end of the Meiiiah's reign as Meffiah, or anointed one, will be the beginning of his reign as God. As the fpirit covenanting with God, as the fent of God, the anointed one, his prieft, and mediatorial agent with his creatures; as his ason- ian vice-gerent whom he has fet at his own right hand, in his own throne, and entrufted folely with the concerns of the creation ; himfelf the Mefllah will be fubordinated to the father, and all creatures with him. But v/hen the father's purpofe in his fon's vica- rial government is anfwered, this very Mefiiah as equal with the father, the fplendor of his glory, his exprefs character, whom M^?. i. 2. He has confiiiuted heir of all things, will inherit the then reflored creatures in feme immutable, and perhaps Letter II. [32] Sect. III. perhaps purely divine manner, tranfcending all that we can conceive of it infinitely; and at a much farther diftance from reality, than the beauty of light and colours exceeded the blind man's defcription of them, when he fuppofed them to be fomewhat like the found of a drum. This doctrine of a final conclufion of our fa- viour's kingdom, faits with all fcripture accounts of the nature of this kingdom: for this kingdom is there reprefented as a ft ate preparatory to fome great defign, the concern and employment of the whole triune God ; a ftate of drawing, re- proving, condemning, cleanfing, regenerating, creating anew, reconciling, chaftifing, and com- forting. A ftate wherein Chrift the Lord of it is re- prefented as a purifier or a refiner's fire, as a fountain opened for fin and for uncleannefs, as a paftor or bifliop, as a prieft, propitiator and ran- ibm, as a mediator, as the power of God to falvation, and as the door and open entrance into him. A ftate which has in view the creature's piety, love, and humility towards God ; and his com- pafiion, innocence, uprightnefs, and communion with all his brethren and fellow-creatures. A ftate in fhort where every creature (^^iroTxyvi'TircfA) ftiall 1)L' reduced to its natural fubordinatlon. But then what means (the uVcra^i? and '^ttotxy^) this fubordination ? The word is plainly applied to both the creature and to Chrift himfelf : the creature fliall be fubordinated to God ; and the fon of God (hall be fubordinated to the father. l6 Letter II. [ 33 ] Sect. III. Is then Chriji now in fom.e inconceivable manner (and for the creature's fake) diftindt from his holy father? And if Cb'iji fliall in the end be what he now is not, furely this mufl: imply feme change which at the end of things fhall be wrought on him, as with regard to his hnhian, fo no lefs with regard to his angelic nature, and thro' him on his now holy family, who in, with, and by tneans of their moft intimate oncfhip with him. As John X. 9. — xiv. 6. the door or pajjage cpened^ f nail then y Eph. ii. 18. have an accefs unto the fa- ther. AndHeb. X. 19. )jA^:bo:D' )2l) la*:^^* VkQJLj.^^ OL^y^- )-a.,an' L-=i>' ' an opennefs of countenance (the mari4 of confidence) ^ to an eii- terance ' of the houfe ^ ofhlinejs ^ thro the blood ^ of yefus', and thereby the honor of becoming 2 Pet, i. ^.partakers of the divine nature ^ even of being fo united to God as that God may be the all in all; and ourfelves Eph. iii. ig. filed with all the fullnefi of God. And here then is that end in view which the whole creation drives at ; the labour of the aeonlan life. And, in defiance of all cavilling, this end, place it where you pleafe, muft prove at laft the limit clofing, and the determining of this sonian life. But Mark xiii. 32. of that day and hour knoweth no one (««^fK) neither the angels which are in heave?i, jieither thefon, but the father only. Offo high a valuation is the creature widi his GodI R LET- [34] LETTER III. ChristV kingdom what^ and where it is\ and when it began, SECT. I. Of the power of Satan, T O S I R, )^)^)fi()S(HERE are various conje(5tures concern- O T w i"g the power of fatan over degenerate ^^^Nj^ nature, but among the moft probable are the two following. Some have thought this his power to be con- natural to him, an original afcendency given him at his creation over certain principalities, do- minions, and orders of creatures, of which part fell with him and fo continued his fubjecHis, and part revolted from him, and fo continued heaven- ly inhabitants in their refpedlive habitations. This his authority thefe fuppofe to be founded upon virtues and endowments lodged perfonally in Letter III. [ 35 ] Sect. I. In him, and communicable from him to his de- pendents, as light and heat are communicated from the fun to all fublunary beings j or as many animals receive their life and vivid efficacy from the rays and nourifhing warmth of its effluence. Others again have fuppofed this power of fa- tan over fallen creatures as neither originally de- ligned by God, nor the effecfts of any natural af- ccndency given him over others j but to be meer ufurpation, the work of fatanic art and fagacity. That as by dint of our human endowment?, man, having arts and fciences which brutes can form no conception at all of, not only becomes fuperior to the brute creation, but, by the exer- cife of thefe arts, the mafter alfo and tyrant over the brutes: fo fatan, by means of his fuperior contrivance, fubtlety and penetration, is become the prince and tyrant over other fallen creatures, domineering in them with an authority which they can no more efcape or refift, than a blind man can efcape the malice of his adverfary, or an horfe in harnefs the drudgery of his driver. But whichever of thefc conjed:ures be true, and by whatever means, in fadt it is certain that fatan is poflefTed of a vaft fovereignty, wherein he controls with a force and defpotifm, of which the oppreffion and cruelty of the mofl mighty ty- rant over his brethren upon earth, is but a faint and unequal figure or refemblance. In the fcriptures therefore he is defcribed as a powerful potentate. Eph. ii. 2. ^be prince of the power of the air^ the fpirit that now worketh in the children of difobedience. That in our chriftian war- E 2 fare Letter III. [ 36 ] Sect. II. fiare we have him for our enemy, that as fuch he exceeds in abihty of mifchief every thing that fiefh and blood can work againft us; or to give it in the apoftle's own words, Eph. vi. 12. JVe wrefile not againjl flefi and bloody but againjl principalities^ and powers J againji the rulers of the darknefs ( ^a otmvi^~ T8T«) of this age, againft wicked fpirits in heavenly places. Yea fatan is declared to be even 2 Cor. iv. 4. (Qjo? r^ cciwog Tjjra) the God of this (not world, but seon, or) age-, and to have Luke xi. 1 8. his ki77gdom^ Rev. ii. 13. his feat and throne^ I Cor. viii. 10. his temple. Rev. iii. 9. his fyna- gogue,' Kgv. xii. 7. his angels , 2Pet. ii. i. 2 Cor. xi. 13. Rev. ii. 2. his prophets, 2 Kings xi. 18. his priejlsy Pf. cvi. 37. Rev. ix. 20, 21. hisfacri- fees ajid worjkipers, 2 Thef. ii. 2, i John iv. i. Rev. xiii. 4. bis revelations. Matt. iv. 9. his pro- viifes ', and even, 2 Thef. ii. 3, 8, 9. Rev. xiii. 2. a chief fon, to be hereafter revealed in the perfon and character of the antichrift, after the working of fa- tan, with all powers, and figns, and lying wonders. SECT. IL Our Lord's defcent into hades. U T this dreadful authority of fatan king of ,' terrors, and fohn viii. 44. firfl murderer, God in his coaipailion determined i^'^v.ry.^ynv') to defeat or invalidate in the perfon of his fon, now the man Chrijl fefus: and for this purpofe the foul Letter III. [ 37 ] Sect. II. Ibul of Jefia was to dcfcend into hades, where is the principal feat of fatan's empire. Accordingly after his death upon the crofs, his flefh being depofited like that of other dead men in the grave, his foul like theirs went into hades, as St. 'Paul tells us, Eph. iv. 9. Now that he afce?ided, what is it but that he defce?ided fi-Ji (fK rot. KXTUTifx ixipn th? -yn?) ifito the /ower parts of the earth. That by the cxpreffion lower parts of the earth is meant hades, appears not only from the general opinion of the primitive people to whom the fcriptures were addrelTed, but from the very context of the above quoted fcripture paffage 5 for herein our Lord's defcent into the parts be- low the earth, flands in oppbfition to his afient into the parts above the earth j and implies that his afcending was in confequence of his prior defcending -, that he afcended far above all heavens that he might fill all things, as the na- tural procefs of his work, having firfl defcended into the parts below, and there difpenfed of his fuln«fs. And agreeably v/ith this notion, was this his defcent into hades alfo prophefied of him, Pfabn xvi. 9, 10. I'herefore my heart is glad, a?id my glory rejoiceth ; my fejh alfo fl^all rejl in hope, ^he- caufe ''thou wilt not leave ''my foul ^infaul, or hades^ NOTES. ''THE greek word (ot.h() hades, which anfwers to the hebrew word ( *?")J?'v:* ) faul, dots by no means de- note a place of mifcry, neither does it a plsce o( happinefs. But as, /«/, the word ( "I2p ) qbr d-- Letter III. [ 38 ] Sect. II. thou give thy ' compajjionate 07ie ( ^'^I'cri ^) to fee ^'cor- ruption (mti^^). For this prophefy is applied to him NOTES. notes the gmve or repofitory of dead bodies-, fo does, Secondly^ the word { '"it ) faul the repofitory of fouls departed ; alfo, Thirdly^ that in hades (or faul) there is a place of refidenee for happy fouls, what follows will evince. Firft^ The word flSJ?) qbr ufed as a verb, fignifies to bury, and as fuch is rendered in the feptuagint by {^c.-rrloi) fepelio to bury; and as a noun it is there ren- dered by the word (ra^o?) fepulcrum^ a grave. Let the following inftances fuffice in proof of this, G^«. xxiii. 6. 1 Kings x\\\. 22^ '^\. xiv. 13. 2 Kings xm, 20. xxiii. 16. y^r. viii. 1. Ez. xxxvii. 13, 14. Pf. v. 9. Secondly^ That by the word (SiKt ) faul or hades, is meant a repofitory for departed fouls, appears from P/lxxxix. 48. Job.vn.g. xxi. 13. xxvi. 6. And be- caufe the dead were fuppofed, upon their bodies being depofited in ( "irip ) qbr, the grave, to find this their foul's reconditory in the lower parts of the earth; the ■word faul or hades is ufed for the depths below, in oppofition to the heights above : fo Pf. cxxxix. 8. Deut. xxxii. 22. Amos ix. 2. At leafr that by the word faul is not meant a grave, js evident from Job xi. 7, 8. Canji thou find out the Almighty to perfetiion ? It (i. e. Providence) is high as heaven^ what canft thcu do? deeper than (faul or) hades, 'wkat canJi thou know? Here the depths of faul or hades, are {tt in oppofition to the heights of heaven, import- ing tliat as nothing is higher than the heavens, nothing is deeper than faul or hades. Now fuppofing laul or hades here to mean ( '^2f. ) qbr, the grave (which all knov/ is feldom more than five feet under ground j Letter III. [ 39 ] Sect. II. him by St. Peter, A<5ts ii. 25, 27. For David fpake concerning hitn — becaufe thou ivilt 720t leave my foul (£K a.h) in hades, neither wilt thou fuffer thine holy one to fee (^^locip^opccu'j corruption. And N O T E S. however, fuppofe if you pleafe, the ancient burying- places to have been five yards under the furface ot the earth) how idle a compariibn were thefe Ihallow vauks to the heights of heaven? Again, Matt. xvi. 18. Upon this rock have I hutlt my churchy and the gaies of hades Jljallnot prevail againjl it. By gates in fcriptures it is well known are meant the council-rooms, or courts of judicature, which in all cities were anciently kept over •their gates; fee Deut. xxi. 19, Ruth iv. i. 2 Sa?n. xviii. 33. xix. 8. Pj. xcvi. 12. cxxvii. 5. Dan. ii. 49. Jer. xxxviii. 7. xxxix. 3. Amos v. 10, Zech. viii. 16. &c. But what can be meant by the door or gate of a fepulchre prevailing againft any thing ? And what harm is the church of God to expedl from the gate or trap-door of a vault under ground? Whereas one may well fuppofe, that courts ot council are held in the regions of the dead, where is the domain and empire offatani and fuppofmg fo, our fcripture exprcffions fpeak good fenfe. Again it is laid of Chrijl, Acts ii. 27. Thou wilt not leave my foul (£i? ah) in hades, a- raong the difembodied fouls. Again, Luke xvi. 23. The rich man being in torments in hades, lift up his eyts, i. e. not the eyes of his dead body, but of the body called, I Cor. xv. 40. ((rw|ua. fTroupanoi/) henvcnly body -, becaufe of its heavenly nature and original. Thirdly, That in faul or hades there is a place of refidence for happy fouls, is again evident from Gen. xxxvii. 35. I Jhall defend unto my fon mourning into feci, or faul, or hades; it is plain that Jacob expelled to meet his fon after death, fince he fays, / fall go Letter III. [ 44 ] Sect. II. And from hence we infer as follows : Thq foul of Jefus was not left in hades, orfaiil-j there- fore his foul had been in faul, or hades : but his foul NOTES. down to my fon; but he expefted not that his body fhould go down to his fon's body, becaufe his fon's body, having been in his belief devoured of beafts, was not fuppofed by him to be in the grave : there- ' fore this expeftation in Jacob of going to his fon after death, argues that he fuppofed a place where the de- parted fouls of men refided •, where his Ion's foul then was, and where his own, when dead, fhould find him. Again, fince it cannot be thought that Jacob ex-- pefted, either that himfelf after death fhould go into a ftate of torment, or that his fon's foul was then in fiich a ftate of torment, he muft have underftood by the word faul or hades fome happy region, the refi- dence of bleffed fouls after their bodies are depofited in ( 1^1:! ) qbr the grave •, and this opinion concern- ing departed fouls we find alfo in Plato, Sophocles, Di~ odorus Siculus, Virgil, Plutarch, and other heathen philofophers. The paradife in hades, whither Lazarus was tran- tlated, confifted of manfions of delight and confola- tion, where alfo Abraham before the refurre6tion of our faviour, prefided as the head of the family of aU tlie faithful ; and as it feerns in patriarchal honours, a reprefentative of Chriji : for under his patronage it may be prefumed thefe bleffed fouls had a hopeful expe6lation of the time of our faviour's refurreftion, when his heavenly fanduary fhould be opened, and themfelves received into the prefence of the divine humanity. Of this we therefore read, Luke xv'i. 22, 23. That Lazarus was feen in it by the rich man^ enjoying the comforts of the faithful Abraham. Letter III. [ 45 ] Sect. II. foul was not left in hades at his refurreBion-, therefore his foul muft have been in hades before his refurredion : but his foul was not in hades during NOTES. As to the expreflions ek tov wXttov and zv too; x.oXttoj? feme fuppofe them to denote the fame as the latin phrafe {infinu ejfe) to be under the umbrage, care, or proteftion of any one; as the complaint of Mofes feems to import. Numb. xi. 12. Jehovah^ where- fore layejl thou the burden of this people upon me, that thou fhouldft fay unto me, carry them in thy bofom : m which ufe of it, a wife is in fcripture familiarly para- phrafed by, fhe who refls in thy bofom ; fhe who lies in thy bofom : but others again, infilling upon the re- markable variation of number in the word xoAtto?, con- jecture that iv koXttoj? nvxi muft have been a Greek phrafe (fmce St. Luke wrote in greek) denoting what the Latins exprefs by in deliciis eJfe, according to which it is to be prefumed, that tho' Lazarus was carried by the angels dire6tly (v. 22. £»? tou xoXttov) into the embrace of Abraham, yet t}iat Dives did afterwards fee Lazarus, not {iv tw koXttco) in the bofom, but {iv TOK xoAttoi?, in deliciis) in the enjoyments of Abraham. But be this remark good or bad, the antiquity of the doctrine among the Jews is certain -, they believed that the fouls of all men when they died went to hades, and that they there divided into two different focieries, viz. the fouls of the juft went into the comforts of Abraham, and the fouls of the wicked into the tor- ments of the damned. And from them this opinion was adopted by the Gentiles: therefore in Virgil ^Nt. read, Hie locus efi partes ubife zia findit in ambas -, Dexter a qua Ditis magni fub mania tendit; Hac iter elyfium nobis : at lava malorum Exercet panas, fc? ad impia tartara mi t lit. Letter III. [ 46 ] Sect. U, during his bodily life; therefore the time of his foul's being in hades muft have been the interval be- "tWeen his death and his refurred;ion. SECT. NOTES. •which paiTage correfponds likevvife with that of So- phocles, Kat yap xaS' a,h,v Svo rpiSou? i/o^aii^OjUfi/, ILoiTTSira (rcc(T£i ttxu^^ (x, Trpoa-y aTruXitrsv. From which words I beg leave alfo to remark, that the verb crooi'^w among the Greeks was quite confident >yith their verb aTroAXyjui; and that a foul may be ((Tu%va,i) reftored which alfo {octtoXXutcci) is deftroy'd -, and confequently that the verb (tu^^co does not properly fignify to lave (viz. from wrath to come) but to re- ftore, (viz. from evil which has befallen us.) For the truth of the above account of hades, the curious are referred to JuJIin Martyr, Origin, Terlul- lian, Chryfoftom, Jofephus and Jerom-, in which laft author we read as follows ; Ante adventum Chrijii (i. e. before the heavenlv^a- radife was opened, of which feafon he fays, i^^jA^^ faradift januam Chrijtus effregerat, jucdum ^fimmeam illam roniphaam iS vertiginem pr^ftdentium cheriihin fan- guis ejus extinxerat) omnia ad inferos fariter ducebantur ; iinde IS Jacob ad inferos fariter decenfurum fe dicit -, iS Job pios iS impios in inferno queritur retentari : Cff eva?t- gelium chaos magnum interpojitum apud inferos-, Cff A^- ham cum hazo.ro, IS divitem in fuppliciis effe tefialiir^ But now, the heavenly paradife being opened ^^ Chriji alcended, all true believers go thither, Jahk xii. 26. — xvii. 24. 2 Cir. V. 8. Phil.'i. 23. where th«. patriarchs alfo now are, in the enjoyments of the glOcy of Jefus; Matt. viii. i i, 12. Mark xvi. 19. Heb. X. 12. 13. — xii. 22 — 24. Letter III. [ 47 ] Sect. III. SECT. III. ^he reajbn of our LoRD'i defcent into hades. OUR Lord's bufinefs in hades was to loofe the bands or ties of hades (or feul, or fiul, or fiol, or flieol, or faul) this we learn from ABs ii. 24. Whom God hath raifed up having loofe d C\o^9^\ rM .N^-> ..' 'the ties or cordages "-of Jiuly becaufe it ivas not poffible (01 ^^ ^«^A.!.^^o ^ \s,cljiJlj^') ^that heJJ.ouldbe detaijied "-in the ^fiul (or f aid.) Our Lord's breaking thro' the bands hereof, became the dehvcrance of all others its inhabitants, who then incorporated themfelves into Chrijij and became his members by believ- ing in him. Here NOTES. 'IT is true we read this pafTage in the greek (Auc-a? T«? wJ'n/a? TK ^ccuxTn) bavh:^ :ooJed the pains of death •, but it is poflible.that the word (w^n') pain was ufed by the Greeks to fignify band, cord, fetter, ligament as well as pain, fince the fyriac (jN. -> >.) hbla does certainly mean both •, that it does fo, appears from A5fs xxvii. 32. Then the foldiers cut ( OL j.'^vZLja ) the ropes^ or cords, of the boat and let her fall off\ as alfo from the hebrew v/ord (^l^in) hbl a rope, from whence the fyriac word hbla is indifputably taken. 'And as hbla muft ncceflarily fignify a rope in this paflage, how reafonable is it that we fliould render (^Q-kA.^' 01 »N.^ >.' |_'^jj.o') "and he loafed -the hands (or fetters) '^ of hades. As to the place of hades Letter III. t 48 ] Sect. 111. Hefe therefofe was the theatre of our Lord's triumph, of which we read, Coin. 15. Having fpoiled (or devefted) the principalities and powers j he made ajhew of them openly triumphing over them (ff auTw i. e. IV io(,\jruY in himjelf'j viz. in the vidlori- ous efficacy of his prefence, in the authoritative afcendency of his own perfonage. The NOTES. we need only fay, that there is fpace enough between us and the fun for all the feveral apartments which the fcriptures feem to fuppofe in it. That hades is out of this our world we think, with Grotius, very pro- bable : who fpeaking of the abyfs in his comment on Luke vm. 31. Says, Si quis tamen modeftce conje5iura ejl locus^ malim extra htinc mundum ajpe^abilem^ eunt (i.e. abyjfi locum) ponere^ ut ^ regionem beatorum fpiri- tuum, quam cum quibufdam in centra terra. Ipfa certe vox oitva-cra vo/Iitatem quandam pr5j Ta7rftvw(r£wg The body of his glory, A fpirit of contrition. Works of impiety. Affedlions of fhame. A hearer of forgetfulncfs. Letter III. [ 53 ] Sect. IV. captivity is to be meant, thofe who are in a ftate of captivity, or the captives ; and that therefore by our Lord's leading captivity captive muft be meant, that he fcized himfelf of thofe who were captives. NOTES. The unjuft fteward. The eled have obtain'd it, The flefhly mind is dead, that original prophefy from whence bt. Paul quotes this pafTage, for he gives us this prophefy, not as his own, but as the words of the Pfalmijiy Pf. Ixviii. 1 8. I'hou hafl afcended into heaven (the exceeding height, ^-^*' n'itt") 'y6^/ captivated 'the captives, haft received gifts for men. But to cap- tivate captives is to take for ones captives thofe who were before captives, or in a Hate of capti- vity j as ^z/^y6 explains this exprefiion. If. xiv. 2. And ihcy fall take them captives, whofe captives they were ( crn^Dwh^ 3'Dw* vnv 'et eriint ~coptivantes ^captivantes eos^ and fall rule over their opprcffcrs. This fame expreffion we likev/ife find in Pzeh. xvi. 53. (r::;'"!L5 n^at'* r.K' ji-irorii-' ri." --si:"!') ^And I captivate (or will captivate) 'their 'cap- tives ' even the * captives - of Sodom, and their daughters, and the captives of Samaria, and their daughters, 'a7id the captives (that are) 'thy captives Letter III. [ 56 ] Sect. IV* captives ( ^n^ity * n^au*^ • ) in the midfi of them (viz. Sodom and Samaria^ And again, in Judges v. 12. -/^r//^ Barak, ^and captivate (or lead captive) V^^ captives {'y^'^'' T\2vy) that is lead home out of that part of Canaan which is the kingdom of Jabin, thofe Jews, thy brethren, which he, the faid king Jabin, there detain'd in captivity." Whether therefore we compare the term cap- tivity in the place contefted with that other place in the Revelations, where alone we find the word ^a.iyj^x\w(rixv) repeated in our greek teflament ; or whether with the original paflage in the Pfalms, from whence the apoftle quotes it; or whether with the fcveral like palTages in the old tefta- ment ; or whether, laftly, we compare it as an abftradl noun fubftantive with other fuch in the new teftamentj ftill we find this term every where fpeaking, that our Lord at his afcenlion carried with him as captives, not fatan lord of death, but of thofe who had been the captives of fatan, and other infernal powers before that time, and confequ.ently that his kingdom was at that time began authoritatively. SECT. NOTES. "The words ('y'2V niir^) captivate thy captivity, in this place c.ianot be underftood of Sifera's army, fince it is exprefsiy faid of thefe (chap. iv. 16) that tkey all to a m.mfell by the edge of the /"jncrd: fo that the cap- tives which Barak was invited in this fong to lead captive, miift have been his brethren, v/ho had been bciore the captives of Jahin, Letter III. [ 57 ] Sect. V. SECT V. Cbri/i's kingdotjifiall prevail under his government, as God-man univerfally. JJdly. THE thing we have to profe, is that the time will come when the kingdom and (Economy of God fhall polTefs itfelf of, and pre- vail over all the world. To this purpofc we have only to produce a few texts. Ifa. xlix. 5, 6, 7. And now fat d 'Jehovah^ form- ing me from the womb to be his fervafjt, to reduce facob to hi?jjfelfy Thd Ifrael be not gathered yet f mil /(namely ^JiK the my Lord the future man Chrijl fefus) be glorious in the eyes of febovah, and my God has been my ftrength. And again he faidy it is a light thing that thou (the Adni or Lord, /. r. the future man Chrijl Jeftis) fiouldfi be my fervant to raife up the tribes of facob^ and convert the prcferved of Ifrael : Ihave alfo given thee to be a light of the Gentiles, to be my falvation even to the end of the earth. T'hus faidfehovah the redeemer of Ifrael his holy one ; to the defpifed foid, to the abominated nation y to the fervant of majiers, kings fall fee, and arife^, princes fall bow themfelves, becaufe of fehovah-, for he isfaithfid, the holy one of Ifrael; and he hath chofm thee. Pf. Ixxii. 8. He fall have dominion alfojrom fea to fca, and from the river unto the ends of the earth. Pf ii. 7, 8. Jehovah faid to me ( *:";k adni, for that thefe words were fpoken typically of, and relate properly to feftis we are alTured, Heb. i. 5. H chap. Letter III. [ 58 ] Sect. V. chap. V. 5. ABs xiii. 23. T'hou art my Jon ^ to-day have I begotten thee-, ajk of me and I will give thee the Gentiles for thy inheritance^ and the ends of the earth for thy pojfejjion. Zech. xiv. 9. And fchovah fhall be king over all the earth -^ in that day Jehovah Jhall be one and his name one. Promifcs like this are to be found in fo many other places, that this point will, I fuppofe, be eafily granted me. iir'^ This kingdom of Chrif is under his particular condud as fon of God, both Logos ana man. Firf. This kingdom of Chrijl is his as a man the fon of God. fohn xiii. 3. ffus knowing that the father had given all things into his hands ^ &c. Matt, xxviii. 1 8. And Jefiis came andfpake unto them faying all power is given unto me in heaven and on earth. Ep. i. 19.- — According to the energy of his mighty power which he wrought in Chrift^ ratfing him from the dead; and he hath fet him (namely the fon of man) at his own right hand in heavenly places^ far above all principality and power and might and dominion, and every name that is named not only in this ceon, but alfo in that which is to come, and he hath put all things under his feet. i. Cor. xv. 27. But when he faith all things are put under him, it is nianifejl that be, who did put all thiiigs under him, is excepted. The kingdom of Chrift may again be called his as man, in regard alfo to its being condudted fingly and folely by himfelf without deputies or reprefentatives. This is a mofl Invaluable privilege, lince we have reafon to believe that the government of all thofe Letter III. [ 59 ] Sect. V. thofe regions and fyftems of worlds in the im- menfe depth of fpace, excepting only where the paradife or kingdom of God is extended, is car- ried on by the adminiftration of the angehc pow- ers; and that from fuch delegated authority thefe potentates have their titles of thrones, dominions, principalities, lordfhips, virtues, &c. But in the regions of paradife the cafe is otherwife, for, Heh. ii. 5. Unto the angch he has not put in fiihjeBion the future age (^Zs^^^ j^'l^j*^) whereof we fpeak^ i. e. the chrifti'an kingdom or paradifaical age, which is began only amc^ig the blefTed. So that what unchriftian, [i.e. ftrange)fubje(flion a chriftlan has ever to experience, will be in this fliort worldly age only, lince, not only no enemy or injurious being fliall, after our Lord's refurrec- tion, have been fuffered to approach his paradi- faical domains, as he fays John xii. 31. Now Jhall the pri?2ce of this world (t8 y.o(r/xa r^a) be caft out, but neither will any celeftial dignity however great or holy have any fort of authority therein. And it is to be prefumed that on account of this efpecial prerogative of the people of Jehovah, was the Ifraelites defire of a king fo particularly fig- nalized by the expreffions of his refentment, as we read i Sam. chap. viii. Secondly^ This kingdom of our Lord's is his alfo as Logos fen of God, ;. e. as Jehovah Adni. Heb. i. 2, — 10. And in thefe la ft days has he fpoken with us by his own foUy whom he hath crdai?i- ed the heir of all tlmigs, by whom alfo he confiitutcd the ages ; who is hiwfelf the fpk7idor of his glory y and the ifnage rf his rffijice, and upholds all things by the virtue of his word, and he by hi mfe If purged H 2 our Letter III. [ 60 ] Sect. V. curfmSy and fat at the right hand of the majefiy in the highefl ; 'ajtd (for) he was ''altogether 'more ex- fellent than *t he angels (^^ t^V-*' ot-^^' jxctjo' ((xpL^isk^V ^^ ^^ inherited a more exalted (ijki^s!^) name than thev -, for unto which of the angels did God ever fay Qo) >^ paf p^O-bsH^) thou art my fin ' — and let all the angels of God worjhip him — of the angels he faith , who maketh his angels fpirits and his minifters an ardent fire : but to the fin he faith ^ thy throne^ O God (^j^^^* j<^ V ^ '^ ' ) ^^ '^^ ^^^ ^^^ of 'ages J afiepter of equity is the fcepter of thy king- dom^ thou haft loved righteoufnefs and hated iniquity y therefore God^ even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladnefs above thy fellows. And again, I'houfrom the beginning haji laid the foundations of the earth, ajid the heavens are the work of tljy hands ; Again, Heb. ii. 5—8. He hath 770t fiibjeBed to an- gels the future age of which wefpeak, (i. e. that age which is quite a new fcene of being, opened on- ly in the paradife of Gop, where the new crea- tion in Chriji is began) but — thou haft humbled him a little lower than the angels, and put upon his head glory and honour, and given him power over the work of thy hands; and haft fubjeSled all things under /j|$ feet J. but in that he fubjeBed all things unto him, he left not any thiiig notfubjeBed unto him ; but now hi- therto we by no means fee all things jubje£ied unto him. And this He is, If a. ix. 6. T^he child born, the mighty God, ("nrio Sn) the ceonian father, the prince of peace. This iirft general exercife of our Lord's ason- ian power, fecms like wife to be the thing meant, v/hen he fa3^s fohn xii. 31, 32. Now ft:all the prince of this world be caft out ; 'and I, ""when Hhat I am lifted up 'from 'the earth (^Oso^'^L^.).,' j^o' )-l|o' 1-1.^)^ ^^^) ft^'all draw all men unto ?ne. And Letter III. [ 6i ] Sect. V. And thus, I fuppofc, this point alfo to be fuf- ticiently proved. But leaft what I have advanced in my prefenC letter may appear to you as wild and fantaftical, I fhall erideavour to juftify myfelf, by fubjoining a few quotations from moft of the chriftian wri- ters of the two firft centuries, which too will, I dare fay, yield you an agreeable entertainment. The teftimonies of the moil: primitive chriftian writers, touching our Lord's defcent into hades. Origen. OOLUS enim (Chrijftus)y^// inter mortuos liber. ^ Et quia liber inter mortuos fuity idcirco devi&o €0 qui habuit mortis imperium, abjlraxit captivita- tem qua tenebatiir in mortem ; et non folum femet- ipfum refufcitavit a mortuis^ fed et eos qui teneban- tur in morte, Jimul excitavit^ fimulq\ federe in cce^ le/iibus fecit. Afcendens in altum captiva?n duxit capti'vitatem ; non folum animas cducens^ fed et cor- pora eorum refufcitanSy ficut teflatur evangeliufny quod midta fanSlorum corpora refufcitata flinty et apparuerunt midtis et introierunt in janclam civita- tem Dei viventis^ Hierufalefn. In c ant i cum cantico- rumy Homilia tertia. Iren^-eus. R A propter dornmum in ca qua funt fub terra defcendifjcy eijangeli'zantem et illis adventum fuuniy remiffam pcccaiorum exijlentem his qui credunt in eum. Crcdiderunt autem in eum omnes jiijU & pro- phet ce ^patriarchal qui bus fimiliter ut nobis rem: fit pcccata. Omnes enim hommcs cgcnt gloria Dei ; jufiificantvr autem non afemetipfis, fed a domini ad- 'veiitUy Old intendunt lumen ejus. Lib. 'w. Cnp. xlv. Justin Letter III. [ 62 ] Sect. V. Justin Martyr. EMNH20H ^c Kupiog o Qsog tuv airo IcrpaJiA vixpui/ xvra ruv X£xoi^ii)iJi,£vccv ft? yi^v p^WjuaTOf, Hj roiTi^ri Tifoq ocvrisq svocy- ysXia-xa-^oii aurotj to Tr\(Ty,v vraAn', ocXka y.svov(Tiv iv ocScc- vcca-ioc. ; xoc^xTrsfi o Ei/wp/ Xj o HAia?, >t, bkti (tvv aurot? bu Tw TTScpx^^igoo a,]/(X.[ji.S]/ovTBgy rriv n^n atwviai/ t)1? ra Xp'fov ai/ara- (Tiug yivo^-:]/v\v v.xrot, ivxKkdyA'j^ JcaO' riv., cog (py\iT.v o Ofioj a- 'TOfoXog^ Travrsg a.XXa.yva'oy.s^cc ; iig yocp a^avarov n xj OKp- S"i3iprov C^iony OUTTW yiyovz nvo? '/i av«rwJ(r»?, ttAjiv t8 (rwTTjpo? Xp'fa. (J'ko >^ TTcwTOTOJCOf Twi/ i/£Jtpwi/, X; a7rapp^») twv xixoijiArj- fAfi/o-'v a:'-i'}/op£u-ai. Refpcnf. ad orthodoxos. But Clemens Alexandrinus even exceeds this, for, fays he, O KTPIOS rj7]yhXi(Taro x) toi? ff aJ'ou — oi ev dh iiot-rarcc- yyjng, >4 Big a,7roo?:Siocv ioc'jr'dg iK^Bour.OTsg^ y,x^x7rBp bx. rivog fscog Btg ^a,Kcc.(T(Ty,v ixovng (XTro-.pll'ZVTzr-^ avroi roiyvi/ Bigiv li t7rx>(.ov(roc,vrBg no? ^-iccg ^ut/xuBoog t£ x, ^w^Jif. ClcJUentis A- kK^^ndrini Jlromatum. Liber fextus. As alfo Tertullian. INFERNUM petit hie animas pro crimine vinBas^ Since Jine prafidioy conchifcB pondere Jegisy Olim Letter III. [ 63 ] Sect. V. Oli??! promijfa, ^ fperata^ & tarda rogabant^ Sancloriim in requiem deditj & cum luce retraxit. *Tertia namq\ die fiibiem cum corpore vicior^ Immani virtute patris, viafa^afalutisy Inq-y creatura portans hominemq^ detimq-, Confcendit c^ Pw^aatwy, k^ twv ttx- nx-xPoviuv hy u; TH 7s-Xri%-jg th crvvxyxs-xi/Tog ru Kvpiu ; ttoAAx yap, M'M)(Pivruv ; x) xxrri7.^iv itq a,>/]u ^ovogy oivnXd-i :.-^>oX^ )-*,.^i^' KaX£5' ) '/ have gotten ^a man Hhe Jehovatj. Eve fuppofed that fhe had now brought forth the promifed feed Jehovah, who, flie believed, would be- come a man by being born of her, the oilspring of j-ier hufband: for the doctrine of the preincarnate ex- igence of fouls is as old as the human race-, our firft parents pre fumed not that by begetting they created men, but only that beings already created, were thro* them formed into human exiftences. Letter IV. [ 72 ] Sect. IL of produfts which he thinks correfpond fo fortu- nately, as to bid fair for opening fome of the moft important truths of the revelations. ' In this work an («iwi/) aeon proves to be a term of 222 2y years, which fquared yields the (^xtm aimwv, age of ages, i. e. the) aeonian aeon, or the term of 4938271,605 years.' This is a very fliort time compared with what the plural aeons import, and yet fuppofing our world NOTES. >■ S«e Bengelius's introdu6lion to his expofition of the apocalypfe, tranfiated by Dr. Robertfon. * jEvi quadratum (ne de cubo dicamus) eft sevum je- vorum, annorum 49382711/^ longijjime ultra atateM mundi excurrens: quadrati duplum, ava {duo) avorum^ annorum 9876543^^. Hoc ideo tantum notamus^ quid afertius figuratum habet numerum ; in a:'uo avorum no- tabiks funt fahus a g ad S^ ad y. (5* a 4. ad ^y ad 2, ad I. U' ■ in fraSOy Ji ekdem proportione refohatur^ nu- merator fupplet 6. g. In avis avorum notabiles funt gradus ^9 ad Q^. i^ fc in fra^o^ fi eadem proportione re- fohatur^ numerator JuppleP^ift^ i . i^c. vividius rem fub-^ jeaerint ccctdis nurjMri expanji: '■ « 7 3 40 500 •^ - '6600 • V ^'7oooi& 800000 I 9000000 In itloy fra^a f? accedit ad-t-o + li-a ^c. in his frac- tnra \l- accedit ad t% + 700 ^c. in utraq; fra^iird nume- rator es 6, 5, y 2, I, feri^m ab 1 ad g explent. Letter IV. [ 73 ] Sect. IL world to be 6000 years old, this fimple fquare will amount to above 823 times our world's age. But how prodigioufly is this fimple fquare ex- ceeded by only the («««>£? onumv or) ages (dual) of ages, a term ftill fo very (hort of the vafl ex- cefs involved in the (««wv£? onuvuv) the aeons of aeens three, 4, 100, 1000 tihies augmented^ that human thought baffled in the conception muft cry out, profundiim I ' K And NOTES. ^id porro erunt ava avorum tria, quatuor^ centum, mille? Qc. Oprofundum! i^ t amen hoc ne vadum qui- dem eft de mart JSierniiaiis ahfolut^e^ quam denotant OI aiuinq TilN oauvuu. Ingentia momenta interdum fcriptura per ftibtiles ftrWuras obiter innuit. ^i capit, capiat. Caveant fihi, qui apocataftafin poft banc vitam decent, ne remjiibilao in millennium du^o exhauriri pUtent ; multo amplior eft menjura aonum\ qua hie attigimus, non ad curiofitatem irritandam, fed ad pe^us dilatandmn, ut cnn- ditati alernitatis, accipiamus. Iri tempore fumus. See Bengelii ordo temporum, p. 325. Slut. 1741. -j^ * T H E C O M P*U T A T I O N. Aiw)-, afe aeon or age = 2222 | years. Aiu-j atuvuv, an aeon of ceons 2222^ x 2222^=4938271,60570.^3. 01 atojvE^TffNaiwi'aji', the aeons of the aeons ^938271^605 x 4938271, 605= 24386526444749, 276025 years. So thot Suppofing the world's age to be 6000 years, the_ above laft pro- duft being divided by them, you have the number of times this world's age is contained in the faid laft produft, viz. 4064 millions 421 thoufand, &c. 6000) 243865264.44749, 276025 (4064421074, 124S79. So that our Lord's kingdom by the fhorteft calculation will continue 4064 millions 42 i thoufand and 74 times the age of this world, when this woild ihall have arrivad to 6coo yeats of age.' Letteji IV. [ 74 ] Sect. II. And yet even all this, fays Bengelius, is ftill fcarcely a ford of that ocean of perpetuity denoted in the ftill higher terms 01 onung TUN aiwuv, l^c. found in certain parts of fcripturc ; fo Rev. iv. 9, lo. T'be living creatures give glory to him that Jitteth on the throne^ and liveth to the aons'of the ccons («"^ f^f ot.iuvxq ruv onwwv^ in fyriac f | No\.>,^' ^„tbdi^*') lolma dolmin 'to the fecula 'of the fecula; and again, Rev. xi. 15. The kingdom of this world is become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Chriji^ and he p:all reign to the aons of the ceons (£j?Tii? a cova? Twi/ aiwiwv) Rev. xxii. 5. And hi s (er- vants fiall fee his face, and his name flmll be in their forehead^ and there f) jail be no nighty for the Lord jh all give them lights and they fhall reign (e'J t«? a;- wv«? Twv a»w «;/) to the ceons of the ceons. But thefe conceptions you fay favour too violent- ly of the aftonifhing and marvellous, and that they have too much of wonder in them to be true. Shall then the term marvellous render the promifcs of ■God ridiculous? His difpenfations are all marvel- lous and full of wonder; and that they appear otherwife to the infidel, is owing to his blindnefs, and brutal ftupidity. " For that a branch cut off, a wither'd rod Shou'd at a word pronounc'd, revive p.nd bud; Is this moreftrange, than that the mountain's brow, Strip'd with december's froft, & white with fnow, Should pufh in fpring ten thoufand thoufand buds, And boaft returning leaves, and blooming woods? That each fuccclTive night from op'ningheav'n, The food of argels fliou'd to man be given. Is Letter IV. [ y^ ] Sect. II. Is this more ftrange than that with common bread Our fainting bodies every day are fed ; Than that each grain and feed confum'd in earth, Raifes it's ftore, and muhiplies its birth ; And from the handful, which the tiller fows, The labour'd fields rejoice, and future harvefl [flows ? '' But as to Bengeliuss calculation whether this- may have been right or wrong, yet that the length of our Lord's seonian kingdom muft needs be prodigious, the very nature of fuch an ceconomy might perfwade the unprejudic'd; efpeclally whca we obierve the fingular llrudure of the expreffi- ons teaching this dodtrine in the original, and the remarkable fuggeftlons they contain. So Exod. XV. 1 8. Jehovah JJ.all 7'eign to the ceon and beyond. ( -ip aSpS ) Dan. xii. 3. ^hey JJjall Jkine as the brightnefs ef the ftrmament^ ajid they that turn many to righteoujnefi^ as the Jiars ti the ceon and beyond ( "i;?^ riSi^iS). Mich. iv. 5. We fiall walk in the name of Jehovah our God to the aon and beyond ( "J>"i l^S'JS ). Dan. ii. 44. And in the days of theje (clay-iron) kings ^ ():all the God of heaven fet up a kingdom which to (plural) teons ( pjSj;S ) Jkall not be dcproycd.-and Jhall Jiand to (plural) (Cons (^'f-Si;'^). Dan. vii. \%. And the jaints of the moji high fiall take the kingdom^ and jl:all pofcfs the kingdom to the cvon^ even to the cecn oj the ceons ( n'd^;? qSv np ^ r^S>' ":>' ) The adding od to olem, and the ihifting the terminations from hcbrew to chaldec, from fin- gular tQ plural, and from fimple to emphatic, and th^t too in the fame vcrfe, as tho' the ex- K 2 . preflion Letter IV. { 76 ] Sect. II.' prcffion was not to be found which might reach the prophet's purpofe;" and the labour'd peri- phrafis of the laft text, are all indications ftrong enough that in the prophets then fublime idea, thQ NOTES. Why the word vo<; ruv ocioovuv. And the reafon is becaufe infpired writers only had fuch notions of the ages as thefe exprefiTions import. Thefe fons of light reading in the old teftament ntiSj;. ii&^^\ pS;}S. l^^ n^dS^*?. -i>' 'r:Siy -i>\ &c. at once underftood that there was a plurality of agesj and that a certain number of thefe conftituted a gene- ral or inclufive age, as a number of days conftitute a week, or as feven years conftitute a week of years i and thefe again (even times repeated, compofethe great week of all which is reckoned from one jubilee to an- other, terminating in a great labbath, to the general delivery of every bondfman and prifoner. I fay our facred writers underftood that the cere- monies of their law, Hek viii. 5. 'were Jbadc-ivs of hea- venly things^ or, Heh. ix. 25. patterns of things in the heavens^ and this occafioned their uncommon critical ufe of the word ^q|i. So when they intended a du- Letter IV. [ jy ] Sect. IL the words olem and od, in whatever form, would denote but very inadequately, the boundlefs fpace of the zeonian life. LET- NOTES. ration of many ages, ijiey wrote Ca? ra? amvxt;) to the aeons, when they had in view a comprehenfive JEon including in it many other fubordinate seons they wrote (fj? a»wv« aiwi/wi/) to the age of ages: when they in- tended the comprehenfive «on alone without regard* to its conftituent particulars they wrote {n<; aiuva. xiuvog) to an aeonian ascn Cfor this being a fyriacifm, means in greek the fame as uq oauj/x octuiuiou) to the asonian seon : and when they int-ended the feveral general or comprehenfive aeons altogether, colledlively, they WTOtQ (bk; ri}(; cx,iuvx<; ruv- oauuuv) to the (plural unafccr- ^ined) aeons of the (plural unafcertair. J) rrons. [78] LETTER V. TTjc term ceo7tian applied to the 'word Spirit^ imports not that Ht is eternal, T O — SIR, ^^^^AVING proved that the terms aeon and # H * o^n^ ^re frequently ufed in fcripture to ^^^^S* denote a temporal duration, the con- clufions built upon them as importing eternity, are at once defeated. Notwithftanding, I dare maintain (tho' my prefent argument does not require it) even what you challenge me to maintain, viz. that the words aeon and olm do no where in fcri{>ture fignify eternity j and that in whatever paffages we find them, they relate to time, and the periods of time, cither before, dur- ing, or after the continuance of this world. It is eafily granted that the Ionian life will in effe(5t be an eternity to them that arc faved ; for when time arrived to its end vanlflies away, and is Letter V. [ 79 ] Sect. i. is no morej tlien that life, which was before temporal, will commence fomewhat elfe, which thoie who like the term may call eternal. This, however, in the courfe of our corref- pondence will appear upon examination of the ufual texts urged againft us ; and among the chief of them will be that in Heb. ix. 14. V'> •• h as you declare in your lad to be your flrongeft proof that the idea of eternity is fcn'ptural, AyaW be my next bulinels. I forefee indeed that it will require a good deal of time, and the length of feveral letters, to ex- plicate this text to your fatistadion, and to- the purpofes I have in view i it being neceflary that 1 clear my way by difcuiTing another point in which I know we greatly differ: however, ?.ll I will demand for my trouble in writing them is, that you read them once over confiderately, be- fore you proceed to cenfure. SECT. I. Heb. ix. 14. TF the blood of bulls and goats fancl if y to tie puri- Jp^^S rf^^^^fifii ^-'^^'^ Wi/<:A more J ha II the blocdcf Chrijl^ ivho thro the ■£ox\VAnfpirit (^ a Trtfu^arof aia>»2 or as in the fyriac we read it ^^j>^/ ).j^q.v^/ 'who ([.OL^j.^^ ).iac::io'' Jll/ to-tb' ola^j^ by the fpirlt ' (olem) ceonian ^cfjered up ^his joul \vtihcut blcmijh 'unto Gody purify cur confcience fnm dead -works ^ toferve the living God. The tETT^R V. [ So ] Sect. I. The charadter here given us of the aeonian fpirit is, that thro' it Chrifl oiFered up himfelf to God irreprehenfible or without fault. Now tho' we feem fufficiently acquainted with the term Chriji, yet before we can judge fairly of this text, we ought alfo to know, ift, who the fpirit is, thro' whom Chriji offered up himfelf to God 5 2dly, upon what account it is faid that thro' him Chriji offered up himfelf to God -, and 3dly, why he is called the asonian (or the olem) fpirit. For effecting this to our purpofe, we beg leave to clear our way by the following politions, viz. I. That the name Spirit does belong to the Logos or Meffiah, or that the only fon of God is a fpirit. II. That this Logos, Meffiah, or Filial Spirit, exifts perfonally diftind from God the father. III. That this Logos or Filial Spirit has a will diftindt from God his father, in the freedom of which will he offered himfelf to the father to be a facrifice for man in the future man ChriJI Jefus. IV. That this Logos or Filial Spirit muft have been that fpirit who moved or influenced the man ChriJI Jefus to become (i. e. is He thro' whom He became) a facrificial offering for us. And having proved thus much (fince we have already proved that Jefus Chriji is the aeonian God) we {hall have confirmed our point, viz. that the aeonian fpirit, thro' whom Chriji offered up himfelf to God for us, was the Logos, or Filial Spirit, ufually called Adn, Lord, or rather Adni, my Lord, in the old teftament, and who is the only fon of GoLtj perfonally diftind from his fa- ther. I. The Letter V. [ 8i ] Sect. L I. The name Spirit belongs to the Logos* or Mefliah; in other words, the only begotten fon of God is a fpirit. I Cor. XV. 45. I'he jirjl Adam became a living foul (i. e. became an animal or foul life) the lajl. Adam (became) a quickening fpirit-, that is, being L in NOTES. ''The term {x^iyoC) Word, in greek, is intended to anfwer the term ( KILD ) mmra, or ( Nitt'D ) mimra, which fignifies juft the fame in the chaldee language, and very frequently occurs in the ancient jcwifh writ- ings, and was well known to the Jews of our faviour and his apoftles times. Now by the term ( KIC'D ) mimra, i. e. Logos or word, they underftood that perfonal prefence who in the old teftament is called Jehovah Adni, and which St. Paul calls (TrpwToIojto?) the firft begotten, who talked face to face to Mofes, Adam, Noah, Abraham, Ifaac, Jacob \ and is every where ftiled the creator of all things. This appears from the jeWiiK targums, or chaidee ' paraphrafes on the books of Mofes, which being writ- ten before our Lord's time, and being ftili in high repute among the Jews, are an unexceptionable wit- nefs of their opinion concerning the Meiliah. Alfo it appears from them that they believed him to be an angelic perfonage in whom the divine nature refidedj and they afcribe to him all the attributes of God. So then by the terms Logos, Jehovah, Adni, and firft-begotten, we muft mean what the apoftles and their cotemporarics thereby meant, namely, one and the fame perlbn cxprefs'd only by different titles-, the ( 'JIN Adni or ) my lord of the Jews, the (>tip»o? or) Lord of the Chrijlians, i. e. Luke ii. it. Chrijl thr. Lord, who (Acts X. 36} is Lord of all. l^ETTER V. [ S2 ] Sect. I. in himfelf a fpirit, even a quickening fpirit, he became a quickening principle to the fons of Ada?Jt ; for John iii. 6. T'hat which is born (or be- ^o^tn) of the Jiejh, isjiejh-, and that which is born (or begotten) of the fpirit, is fpirit. And this begetting, and fo quickening fpirit is the very fon of God, who is the Lord, the Logos, or word of God. John v. 2 1 . As the fa^ ther raifeth up the dead, and quickeneth them % even fo the fon quickeneth whom he will. 2 Cor. iii. 16. Who alfo hath made us able minijters of the new tef- t anient, not of the letter, but of the fpirit j for the letter killeth, but the fpirit giveth life. V. 17. Now the Lord (i. e. the Logos or Adn) is that fpirit. As he is again ftiled, 2 Cor. iii. 1 8. The Lord the fpirit. (XTTO 3tUp»8 TTJ'fVjWlXTO?) But the Logos, or Adn, or fon of God, is alio called the fatlier of fpirits, which is again a proof that the appellation fpirit is moft juftly his. Heb. xii. 6, 9. Whom the Lord loveth he chafien- eth', V. 9. iind fJja II we not be in fubjeSlion to the father of fpirits, and live? But the fame who chaf- teneth is alfo the father of fpirits ; therefore the Lord called (Adni) my Lord in the old tefta- ment, even the firft and only begotten fon of God, who is now become the man Chrifl Jefus, he is the father of fpirits. To conclude then. Since it appears that Chrifl is a quickening fpirit, the fpirit of the refurredtion, tlu: accompliihing fpirit of the law, the true fon of God wlio is a fpirit, and the father of fpirits; characters all which are no where applied as be- longing to a-iiy other perfon than Chrifl Jefus-, our Letter V. [ 83 ] Sect. II. our firft article is evinced; namely, that the Mef- iiah muft be a fpirit, and therefore may, at Icaft for any thing contained to the contrary in the term ipirit, be aptly called the asonian fpirit." SECT. ir. II. He this Ofjly begotten fen of God or Legos ^ exijis perfonally diJiinEl from God the father. THIS appears from P/ ex. i. Jehovah ( M'n'' ) faid unto ( '^^l^ Adni) my Lord, fit thou on my right hand 'till I ivake thy foes thy footfiooly this paflage we alfo find Mat. xxii. 44. Mark xii. 36. Now Jehovah is God, and Adni is the fpirit covenanting with God, who faid, Heb. x. 7. Lo I come to do thy wiilj O God, i. e. He is the Mef- fiah: God therefore and the Meffiah are perfo- nally diflind: from each other, or are two con- trading parties, the one propounding, the ether L 2 accept- NOTES. * Poffibly you may expe6l that I here fpeak more diftinftly concerning the fcripture do6lrine ot the fpirit of the father, and the fpirit of the fon, obfervablc in many parts of the new teftament. So Mat. xii. 28. Luke'w. I. A^sx. 38. John XV. 26. Gdi. iv. 6. i Pet. i. II. I John iv. 13. i Cor. vi. it. Ro;?i. viii. 9, 15. But as this point belongs efptciatly to the fecond part, which I intend, if it pleafe God to give me life and ability, 10 write to you upon the human foul, as I promifed you, I fliall decline it in this place. Letter V. [ 84 ] Sect. II. accepting propofals of treaty: but without further urging this palTage at prefent, I fliall proceed to prove my point from the vifibility and other pro- perties of the Logos, which cannot be applied to the invifible father. 1 . That God the father of the only begotten fon of God, is not vifible, appears from many places of the bible; let the following fuffice 'John i. 18. No one (a^fi?) hath feen God at any time-, the only begotton fon (« wv) who is in the bojom of the father, he {i.e. he only, having feen him) hath declared him. John vi. 46. Not that (tj?) any one bath feen the fa- ther , except he who is of God, he hath feen the father. I John iv. 12, 20. No one (jj^jk) hath feen God at any time. — He who loves not his brother y whom he has feeny how can he love God whom he has not feen f I Tim. vi. 16. whom no man hath feen, nor can fee. So I T'im. i. 17.^ 2. That the Logos or only begotten fon of God is vifible, appears from numberlefs pafTagcs in fcripture, of which we fliall prodiice a few. Gen. NOTES. '>' ISIon enim (nt quidam putant) natiira Dei inviji- hilis eji alicui (s' aliis vifibilis eft; non enim dixit apoftolus imago invifibilis Dei hominibiiSy aut invifMis peccatoribus ; fed valde conftanter pronunciat de ipfa natura Dei dicens ; imago invifibilis Dei. Sed (jf Johannes in evangelio di- cens, Deum nemo vidit unqiiam., manifefte declarat omni- bus qui intelligere pojfunt, quod nulla natura eft cui viji- hilis fit Deus: non quafi qui vifibilis quidem fit per na- turam^ l^ veltit fragilioris creatiir^^ evadat atq; excedat afpe^um, fed quoniam naturaliter videri impoffibik eft. Origen de principas, lib. i. cap. i. Letter V. [85] Sect. II. Gen. iii. 8. And he heard the voice of Jehovah God walking in the garden in the cool of the day ; and Adam and his wife hid themfelves from the prefence of Jehovah God^ ( u2*nSi« rrrr ) among the trees of the garden. Jehovah God is here declared vifible, fo viflble as to be the objed: of human eyes, and fo the ob- jcd of them, that Adam in his nakednefs, would have avoided feeing him, by hiding himfelf a- mong the trees. Now that no objedion may be here ftarted from that great term ( ^hSk nin^ ) Jehovah God (or Gods) it {hould be obferved that God both father and only begotten fon are diftindly and feparately called by names denoting in common the divine being. So Gen. xix. 24. And Jehovah ( frm^ ) caufed to rain upon Sodom and Gomorrah, b?'imJione and fire from the Jehovah ( rwi^ nK?: ) out of the heavens, i. e. Jehovah the fon, perfonally diftind: from Jehovah the father, caufed this rain from his father, who was in heaven. Gen. xvii. i. And when Abraham was gg years old, Jehovah appeared to Abraham, and faid unto him, lam ( nt^ Sv ) the almighty Gcd, (or rather God that produceth or poureth forth all things) walk before me, and be thou perJ'cB. Here again is certainly a perfon feen of Abra- ham: but Abraham could not fee the father God invifible : Whom faw he then ? he faw him who is God vifible, who is. Col. i. i :;. the image of the. invifible God, the firfi- begotten of every creature, and in feeing him he in effedl faw the father, as fays our Lord, John xiv. 9. He that hath feen me, hath feen Letter V. [ S6 ] Sect. II. feen the father alfo \ becaufe (ver. lo.) lam in the- father, and the father in me. The like again wc read Gf;2. XXXV. 9, 11, 13. And God appeared unto yacob again when he came out of Padanaram, and hleffed him, and faid I am God Almighty, be fruitful and multiply, &c. and God went upfront him in the place where he talked with him. Exod. xxxiii. 1 1. And Jehovah fpake unto Mofesface to face, as a man [peaks unto his friend. Numb. xii. 5, 8. And the Lord faid, if there be a prophet among you, I the Lord will make mfelf known to him in vifion, and willjpeak unto him in a drcam-y my fervant Mofesis 7iot fo; with whom I will fpeak mouth to mouth, and in vifton, and not in fimilitudes', and (in io much that) he Jljall contemplate ( D^3^ mn^ r^cm ) the ifnage (or figure, or perfonagej cf Jehovah ^. This NOTES. * D'3* Is the third peiTon fingular of the future tenfe of the conjugation hiph of the verb LJ»3% which figniBes to fpeculate upon, look into, revolve in mind, contemplate. See in Ifaiah viii. 22. xxii. 11. h. I, 2, 6. The antithefis here is remarkable; fays the Lord, To a prophet I ivill reveal myfelf only in dreams and vifwns, but io Mojes more apparently and as a friend familiarly And may we not hence infer that the Lord revealed hi mfelf to Mofes neither by phan- tafm, nor by proxy, but in a way more evident and apparent than thefe, yea than vifion itfeif ? And what could this way be lefs than (what the words we infift upon mean in their critical acceptation and truthj a familiar converfe with Jehovah in his perfonal circum- fcribed prefence, called in the old teftament (nNI^ VU) the face of Jehovah ? Thefe words can in no wife be Letter V. M? 1 Sect. II. This perfonage JWe/^jfirft faw at the bufhj Exod, iii. 2, 1 5. who there declared himfelf to be the God of his fathers, the Jehovah y the ( ^l^^.J< *.t'K. ^:^"I» or which is the lame, nriN lU'K n1^^ ) I will be who will be-, from whence his name ( n'n* ) Jeve, or Jehovah, He will be. Jehovah NOTES. faid of that divinity which no one has feen or can fee, nor can they be underflood of an airy phantaftic body, becaufe to contemplate fuch is fo far irom feeing God face to face apparcndy, that it is not to fee him at all, fo that this appearance can have been no other than that real angelic preincarnate perfonage, which was the (ttpwtotoxoj or) firft-begotten fon in which the divine nature dwells. Chriji in his invifible, infcrutable, eternal nature, is, 1 John V. 20. (0 ux-n^mq 0£o?) Ihe true God. Tit. ii. 13. (0 i/.iycx.q Qioq) The great God. Rom. ix. 5. (J jtt; TTx\iruiv Qioq) The God over all., blejfed for ever. In his preincarnate maniteflation, he is {-Tr^uixolc-A^) the firft-begotten, {^^ rco laxwS ocurov tou irocTipx oiaacKnari. JuJlin Martyris dialog, cum Tryphone judao, •^ And in like perfonal characters of diftin<5tion was our Lord frequently feen of the Ifraelites\ as of Gz- deon., {i:t Judges y\. 11. — 24. where the pofture, the itction, the name as well as the exprefs words of the Letter V. [ 91 ] Sect. II. For as a man, tho' he cannot behold either the fpirit or the foul of his father, friend or fellow crea- ture, yet beholding the perfonal prefence of thefe, may in ftri<5l troth be faid to behold even them; fo the patriarchs feeing the angelic prefence of Jehovah, were faid, even by God himfelf, to be- hold Jehovah. Says Jehovah, If. xlv. 22. / (that is I whom thy eyes behold) am God^ and there is none elfe. The object here vifible was only the angelic per- fonage of Jehovah, i. e. of the fon of God j and yet this feen, Jehovah, the only God, is declared to be himfelf feen, in that he was fo feen as a man is feen when he fays of himfelf, I whom thou feeft am thy father, friend or brother ; altho' he diftinguifhes not between his external and inter- nal exiftence; between the temple vifible, and its inhabitant the inward man invifible. And in M 2 this NOTES. hiftory, do all atteft die Lord vifible to him, and the fame to Manoah, lee Judges xiii. 3. — 22. and to Amos, Zechariah, Ezekiel, Daniel and Elias, and Simeon., and even mod of the prophets. But not only the Ifraelites, for even Nebiichadnezar law him in the furnace of fire walking with Shadrack, Mefak and A- bednego; and fays of him, the form of the fourth is like i he fon of God: by which it fecms that the appearance of Chriji was no uncommon thing in thofe days ; fc.r fmce it is the ufual manner of fpeech to defcribe ftrange, new, unknown things, by comparing them to things better known, and of which one has a clearer notion; Nebuchadnezar^s words imply, that he knew the fon of God by the dcfcription of him heard from others, who had feen the real prefence he exhibits. Letter V. [ 92 ] Sect. II. this regard of them are the following fcripture paflages to be underftood by us. Ifaiah xliv. 6. I am the [firji and I am the laji^ and be fides me there is no God. Verfe 8. Is there a God bejtdes me"^ yea there is no (other) rock^ I know not any. Dent. iv. 35. 'Jehovah he is Gody there is 7ione elfe befides him. Deut. xxxii. 39. 1 even I am he and there is no God with me. If. xliii. 10. Be- lieve and under [i and that lam he-, before me there was noGodformedy and after me there Jhall be none. Ifa. xlv. 5. I am Jehovah, there is none elfe, there is m God except me ( ^61? ) ver. 6. ( •'^>S3 ) befides me. That the perfon fpeaking in the above paffages may be the fon of God cannot be doubted, fince we iind the fon of God expreflly called {fJoh?i \. i. Matt. i. 23.) God. John xx. 2ci. My Lord and my God. 2 Pet. i. I. Our God. i John v. 20. True God. Pfalpi Ixxviii. 56. i Cor. x. 9. The moft high God. Rom. ix. 5. God over all. Rev. xv. 3, 4. Lord God Almighty, who only art holy : and in numberlefs places Jehovah, names intelligible only in our Lord's own account of himfelf, Jchnx. 30. land my father (not £»? ^(ri^sv are the fame in perfon or manner of fubfiftence 5 but «" £o■|U.f^) ^^e the fame thing, or one in nature-, and for this reafon alfo the fon is called God even by his father himfelf. Heb, \. 8. But unto the fon he (the father) faith, Thy throne, O God, is to the aon of aojis, a fcepter of equity is the feepter of tlyy kingdom. This vifible God of glory before the incarna- tion is caHed ( M'.T ^ilK Adni leve or) My Lord Jehovah. If.Yix. 20. Jobxix. 25. ( 'S^•J or Sf*'J My redeemer. Mai. iii. i. The angel of the cove- nant. Zech.m. i. The angel Jehovah. IfAxm. 9. The Letter V. [ 93 ] Sect. II. 'The angel of his prcfence', but moft ufually Je- hovah or God: and when his diftindion from the father is intended, himfelf is called lingly God, and his father is called his God; fo PJhlm xlv. 6,7. I'hy throne, O Gody is aonian and beyond ( -i^'i elS^V D'hSk ) — God even thy God ( :z:"nS« ^Thii ) hath anointed thee with oil ofgladnefs abcue thy fellows, i. e. Thou who art God, art anoint- ed by thy God above the angels, who, tho' created by thee, are notwithftanding thy fellows, in that they bear thy likenefs, and are the vary- ing images of thee the one God-begotten uncre- ated angel ; for fuch thou art in thy vifible na- ture, at the fame time that in thy unfearchable nature, thou art unknown to, being beyond the conception of all but thy father only. And with like import and infinuation fpeak our Lord's own i^ords, John xx. 17. / afcend unto 7ny father ^ and your father^ and to my God, and your God. But after the incarnation our viiible God is called. Matt. xvi. 16. Chrifl the fin of the living God. I Cor. XV. 47. T^he Lord from heaven. Ad:s X. 36. T^be Lord of all. Adls vii. 2. 'The God of glo- ry. Phil. ii. 6, 7. Who being before his incarnation (fi/ iKo^(pr\ 05a) in the form of God, did, after his in- carnation, allbme the form of a fcrv ant (^f^op(pnv hxa) becoming the likenefs of man ^ and is diftinguiflied from the father by the term fon.' Of NOTES. ^ Some of the primitive chriftian writers fpeak very clearly of both thefe natures of the fon of God. So E^£ij Hv {/.oi, cru (prs rov (teov iv tottu (jli) Sz'.v yji^pmr^ou, ^ Letter V. [ 94 ] Sect. II. Of thefe his two diftin(5l ftates, viz. that before his incarnation, and that after it, our Lord often {peaks in the gofpel. Thus when our Lord prays, yohn xvii. 5. iii. 13. And now, O father, glorify me with the glory which N O T E S. * /W.E1/ Geo? Xj Trarnp ruv oXuv cc^copyiroi; fr», ^ £i> totu oup^ ju- puTKiToci-y ou yxp £r» TOTTo? T»5 xaTaTTauo-JCt)? avTa; (Jf Xoyoq ccvra, ^i 8 TC6 'rrocvra TrsTrotriKBy ^vvocy-ig uv Xy (ro(pitx. uvth, (for the antient Jews and primitive Chriftians defcribe the Logos, as having in him, for his chara6leriftie attribute, a principle of divine wifdom and efficacy ; and on account of this they frequently call him the wifdom of God and the virtue of God) avochocfj^Qavw to -TTxpocSiKTov iv 7rpo^ wy^iXsi rci) ASoc^. — Theophilus ad Autol. lib. ii. OvTt ovv ACpocxy. ovrt aXXog av^puTruv «(Jt rov Tracjipot x) otppriTOV xup:oi/ ricv ttocvtcov aTrXwf, Xj aura ra Xpifn; aXA' £- iiEiuov rov >t«T« j3aAt]i/ tvw ?x£n/a >tj 0£oi/ ovroi Viov aura, x^ Ay~ fcXov IX ra ■uTrnpirsii/ rv\ yvw^y\ aura ; ov Jt, a^S■|5W7^o^ yzvvi\~ S'fi/at ^(« T»)f TrapS'fi/ou PsSouXvilaii o? Xj Trvp iroli ysyovi Trt rrpoq Mwtrfos ofMiXix rri (xtto rv\g jSara. ETrft £av jm.» outw voTKTOjasv ra? ypaipa?, cu^p?i(r£laf rov Trxnpoc Xy xvpiov ruv eXuv jj^ri ^ TraAiv (J\a AaStJ* ot£ XsXixlxi outw?, apotrs TruAaj o« apj^cyxfj Jjuwv, >^ STrapGriTS 7ri»A«t ckwi/jo;, jtj £(?£A£Uo-£la» o Pao-iAsu? Tnj J'o^r)?. — x^ ort o p^pirs? >^ ^£0? 6£eLi viog VTrxp^uv^ ■3^ $vvx[j,£i (pxivofj^ivoq zrpOTspov ug ccynp-, Xj a,yhx(^^ x, iv Trvpog ^o^n w? £;» rr, (ioClu m'px.vra.i^ Xj iti rr,q xpiauiq rv\q yiyivr\fj^(vTn^ £urt l^oSo^x^ u-n-o^i^EiyJtoa iv ttoAAoj? toj? £ipT]j!xfi/ot(r, ^eT. ^J'f. Juftin Martyr, dialog, cum Tryphone judaso. Letter V. [ 95 ] Sect. IL which I had with thee before the world was ; how can this be underftood but of his preincarnatc angehc nature which we maintain ? Can Chrijl in his divine nature fufFer any diminution of his glory ? Muft not the fon of God in his divine effence be immutable, without variation or iha- dow of changing ? But in his angelic nature, as the firft begotten of the creation, or as the begotten before all creatures, all this may be, conliftent with all revealed accounts of him. As we read John i. i. In the beginning (that is before the creation began) was (i. e. exifted) the word (Logos ; but how did he exift, by Creation ? No;) he was Col. i. i ^, (TrpwToIoxi^) The Jirjl- begotten (and fo begotten as to be) the image of God (and fo compleatly his image as) that in him fiould dwell all the plenitude of the Godhead. In him, in his angelic flate, dwelt the plenitude of the Godhead; and becaufe all ful- nefs (i. e. creaturely as well as divine) muft dwell in him, he alfo became man ; in which capacity being now the bodily ten. pie of God, we read of him, that Col. ii. 9. In him dwelleth all the plen^ itude of the Godhead bodily. It is therefore this the preincarnate perfonage or filial fpirit. Logos or Chrijl, which enjoy 'd a glory with God before the worlds were ; which laid afide his glory at his incarnation, and refum- ed it after his refurredtion j of which himfelf fpeaks, John VI. 62. What if you fiall fee the fon of man afce?id up where he (\. q. who now inhabits my body) was before , i. e. Rom. vi. 4. ifito the glory of his father, which John xvii. 5. He had iviih the father before the world was. In Letter V. [ 96 ] Sect. II. Tn this perfonage Job both faw him and heard him, when he fays, Job. xhi. 5. / heard of thee with my ears, but now mme eye hathfeen thee ; i. e. I have leen thee as evidently with my eyes, as 1 had heard of thee with my ears : and again. Job. xix. 26, 27. Tet in myfleJIdjldaUIfeeGod^ whom IJballfee for myfeJf {^ infuper porro as well as, and i. e.) Tea mine eyes haiiefeen thee, and not a fir anger. ^ And of this again our Lord fpeaks, when he tells us John iii. 13. No man hath afcended up to heaven^ but he that came down from heaven, even the f on of man, who is in heaveh. So that, as there is a perfonal diftindlion be* tween God the father and the man Chrif Jefus, and yet the man Chrijl Jefus is the fon of God 5 fo there is alfo a perfonal diftindlion between God the father and the filial fpirit call'd Jehovah Adni, and yet Jehovah Adni was the fon of God. And as the man Chrift Jefus is not created, but the begotten fon of God ; fo Jehovah Adn was not created, but the begotten fon of God : only NOTE S. e ,J^J,^t .,V7 njHK'^ ^:^5 -,^J{4 ^^t l^jpj^i* ^-Itt^ifiV -J5II j,tj<^or <,j^^»^9 ^et de came men ^videbo Deum '^ quern ^ ego ^vifurus fum (\. e. videbo) "^ mihi, ^ et (\. e. porro)' oculi met "^viderunt ^°et ?ion ^^ aliemim. The original fpeaking firft in the future tenfe (^^;^^') videbo, and then in the preter tenfe {^Ki) viderunt, im- ports that Job comforts himfeif in tiTe hopes of feeing our Lord in another itate of being-, and grounds his hopes on a confidence of his redeemer's living, be- caufe his own eyes had now feen him in his true, and not in a ftrange or borrowed appearance. Letter V. t 97 ] Sfect, IL 6nly the man Chriji Jefiis was begotten after the Creation, whereas Jehovah Adn, or the Logos, was begotten before created nature began. Again, as Jehovah Adn^ being begotten of the father, became the {n ot^xf^ rn? >c7»o-£w? ts ©jx) the original of the creation of God ; fo the man ChriJI yefuSy being begotten of the Holy Ghoft, becomes the original of the new creation which is to be effedled by him, Rev. xxi. 5. Again, as after the incarnatiortj the individual perfon Cbriji Jefus was God aftd man ; fo before the creation, the individual perfon Logos was the God afterwards known by the title Jehovah Adn, or God and angel the Lord. Again, as Jefus Chriji after his incarnation was vilible as to his manhood, and not as to his di- vinity; fo Jehovah Adn before the incarnation was vifible as to his angelical perfonage, and not as to his divine nature. Again, as it is the efpecial privilege of chrifl- ians to know that Jefus ChriJI is the fon of God ; fo it was propounded to the Jews as their efpecial privilege, to know that their gracious Adni was true Jehovah. And here I cannot forbear remarking, that in this idea of the divine Logos, that text which the Mennonijls fo tenacioufly -and commcndably infifl: upon, and with which they ^o much per- plex their learned Oppofcrs, namely, John i. 14. (0 xoycuro1c::oi or) Letter V. [98] Sect. Ilf. firft- begotten of God, the original or beginning of the creation of God, (u.^J^O ''^^'^ ^that ^ which is begotten '^in her is by (of or'from) the holy ghoji. Again, Luke i. n r. (irvivtMcc ayiov nriXivtriroa tTn ci«.(r£j croi J'jo >t, to yBvvuy,£vov ocytov xXfiS'Jio'fTai Jioj 6£a) • the NOTES. f ETTio-jctao-st i£itx,vrjTO, x) rvpcivviyin ccp'/7\ )ca6'/ip£iT0, Ofou wj av- Sp&JTTOU (pa.ivoi/.iVis, ^ ay^purrov wf Osa ii/£pyovvTO<;. ccKkoc oute TO TTPOTipoi/ ^o^a,y ovT£ TO JiUTcpsi/ T^iXoTxg. ciXXoi TO ^2)/ aAv;-« S^a«, TO ^£ 01XOV01MX. Letter V. f loi ] Sect. III. " Mary were r>ot different) but identically one " and the fame, the Ion of the virgin and the " fon of God." Agreeably hereto we alfo read in Jujlifi Maj^Iy?\ ftkvfJWTTfKZf, ^£0^ Xy TTocrrip TWi/ oXoou yivocT^ai ccvtov j^sA^.e? " That is, — Mekbifedec, Does not this fignify to " us that from above and in an human womb (fee " Mat. i. 20, TO f^ «-jT»j ym-A^iv) the God and father " of all would have that he (the Logos) fhould " be begotten (avcoSev, i. e. by the holy ghoft.) — " See Dialog, cum T'ryphone judceo. So alfo ^ertullian. Non competebat ex feminc humano DeiJiUum nafci, ne Ji totus ejjet Jilim hominisy Non cjfet et IDeiJiliiis, nihilq; haberet amplius Solo- mone. Ergo jam Dei Jilius ex patris Deijetnine ^ ut ejJet hominis jilius. Caro ei fola erat ex hominis came fwnenda fine 'viri femine. Vacabat enim viri Semen, apud habentem Dei femen. Tertullian de Carne Chrifte, cap. 1 8. " It fuited not that the fon of God fliould be *' born of human feed, leaft if he were altogether " the fon of man, he would not be alfo the fon "of NOTES. '' By patris Dei femine, Tertullian means the divine fpirit, and fuppofcs its diftin6lion from his flefh to be the ground of our Lord's words, which he cites as follows, ^(od ex carne natum eft caro eft, quia ex carne natum eft-, £5? quod dc fpiritu natum eft fpiritus eft, quia Deus fpiritus eft, ^ de Deo natus eft. And this palliates his otherwife flrange exprelTion, the feed of God. Letter V. [ 102 J Sect. III. " " of God, having nothing more than Solomon. " He is then the fon of God by a feed of God *' the father, that fo he might be the fon of man. *' His flefh only was to be derived from human " flefh without the male feed; for the nlale feed, " in that fhe had the feed of God, was fpared." But without appealing to the authority of an- tiquity, our own judgment muft teach us, that if the body of Chnji had been radically the offspring of the virgin, it mufl have been, like its fource, unclean; lince, yo^ xiv. 4. john Hi. 6. a clemz thing cannot come out of an unclean ; and lince the virgin mother mufl have been, Eph. ii. 3. by na^ iiire the child of wrath .y even as others. Alfo if the facrifice of an impure thing is odi- ous to God, our Lord's body, had it been pri- marily the offspring of the virgin, mufl have been fo far from a fufhcient attonement for fin and uncleannefs, as to have been in itfelf an of- fenfive and rejeded offering. As we learn therefore. Gal. Iv. 4. Kom. i. 3. that he was born oj\ or conceived out of a woman^ (^iz y^uccinoi yivo[/.svov^ of the feed of David, according to the flefi', and from thence infer that, with re- fpe6t to our Lord's maternally augmented fub- flance, he was the true fon of the woman; fo we learn that that very conception of the woman was begotten of the holy ghofl, and thence infer that with refpedl to our Lord's being a human fub- liftence or man begotten, he was the the true fon of God, that is, he was his fon-man, called in the jewiih language (tflL-L*, ^) fon-man; or which is the fame (jlkj-), v-^) fi'-^^^ ^ui Homo (fcilicet *. (ft) Letter V. [ 103 ] Sect. IIL eji) fon who (is) man^ or as in other places (Ljcj-!^ OL-'yC^flius ejus qui homo) his fon that is a man'; for by fome one of thefe appellations does our Lord ufually call himfelf/ And for this reafon alfo, is the human perlbii oi'Jefus called in fcripture the fin of God, and his blood the blood of God, and his congregation of the faidiful the church of God-, (o Rom. viii. 32. Jf God /pared not his own fon {oi.ys^flio ejus, namely the man Chrijl Jefus) but delivered him up for us all, &c. Rom. v. 10. We were reconciled to God by the death of his fin. Adls xx. 28. The church of God which he has piirchafed with his own blood, &c. For the man, or human perfon, Jefus Chrijl is fingly and individually that fon of God, i John i. 7. whofi blood was fpi It for us, who (Heb. vi. 6.) was crucified, and (Ac5ls iii. 26) was raified up from the dead; after having indeed fiuffered (Rom. vi. 10) death, eve?! the death of the crofs. There can be no doubt but God is able to effed; out of his own fulnefs a bodily fubftance, verily indued with all the properties of an human body; and fuch fubftance we believe did reiiilt from NOTES. J I would not here be underftood to fay that (y) d af- fixed to the latter of two fubflantives in the* fyriac language, may not anfwer to the latter of two fubflan- tives ot a genitive cafe in the greek or latin tongue ; for it is certain it does. But I fay that the import of thefe two forms are different-, and that (,) d in the fyriac tongue aflixed to the latter of two fubflantives fignifies the fame as qui eji^ who is-, and will there- fore bare a conflruftion and force which the latter of two fubrtantives in the greek will not. Letter V. [104] Sect. IIL from God as a father, to the effeding the hu- man nature of our Lord j but with refped: to that fubftance which as the fon of a wontan accrued to this his divinely generated fubftance, this we doubt not was from the virgin. The man Jejus Chriji was therefore the fon of GoDj railed out of the fruit of Davidy conceived of (by being implanted into) Mary, who was of the feed of David; and hence that diftindtion^ I Cor. XV. 47. TheJirJ} man is of the earth earthy^ the fecond man is the Lord from heaven, i. e. is the Jehovah Adn, who (""ap^ lyivi-^o) is become iiefhj or man, in a conception divinely derived, tho' earthlily augmented. Having then fufficiently proved that there muft be a perlbnal diftin