i ^Ry OF mucET^ €.5 ■7 ^z I Clavh'8 ipeoples Commentary GALATIANS, EPHESIANS, PHILIPPIANS, COLOSSIANS, I. and II. THESSALONIANS, I. and II. TIMOTHY, TITUS, and PHILEMON A POPULAR COMMENTARY UPON A CRITICAL BASIS, ESPECIALLY DESIGNED FOR PASTORS AND SUNDAY SCHOOLS <8>^^^^^^^<8> V GEO. W. CLARK, D. D. Author of " A New Harmony of the Gospels," and a " Harmony of the Acts," etc. m PHILADELPHIA AMERICAN BAPTIST PUBLICATION SOCIETY 1420 Chestnut Street 1903 Copyright 1903 by the American Baptist Publication Society Published February, 1903 jfrom tbc Socfett'0 own Press PREFACE While in the Theological Seminary the writer conceived the idea of prepar- ing a Commentary on the Holy Scriptures. A fe^Y years later, engaged as pas- tor, he was about to begin with the book of Genesis, but the indications that Sunday-school instruction would for some time center largely on the life of Christ led him to prepare an " English Harmony of the Gospels," and a volume of Notes on each of the four Gospels. Since then the work has been carried on through the Acts and the Epistles, as time and health would permit, until now the commentary on the New Testament nears completion. Though popular in form and based upon the Common version, in connection with other English versions, the commentary is grounded on the critical text of the original. An underlying critical commentary was often mentally prepared as a basis of the explanatory notes and practical remarks which were intended to meet the needs of many Bible readers and students who have little or no knowledge of Greek. In the volumes on the Epistles the Improved Bible Union version has been placed parallel with the Common version for reference. The American Standard Revised version is also recommended for consultation. With the study of these sacred Avritings the conviction has deepened that they are the inspired word of God, In them we tind the thoughts of God made actual in the experience of " men who spake from God, being moved by the Holy Spirit." It has been a great privilege to verify these great truths in one's own experience by tasting " the good word of God and the powers of the age to come." May many who consult these vohimes enjoy a fresh revelation of these great truths in their own hearts. Two more volumes are in readiness, and when they are published, the whole will form a popular commentary on a critical basis, uniform in plan and scope, upon the New Testament. It is a cause of devout thanksgiving to God to have completed a work on which much of the thought and Avork of a lifetime has been given. G. AV. C. HiGHTSTOWN, N. J., Jan. 1, 1903. WORKS REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMENTARY AND ACCESSIBLE TO GENERAL READERS Abbott, Dr. T. K. International Critical Commentary. Alford, Dr. Henry. Critical Commentary. Alexander, Dr. J. Addison. Commentary on the Psalms. Bengel, Dr. J. A. Gnomon of New Testament. Bernard, Dr. J. H. Cambridge Greek Testament, Pastoral Epistles. Boise, Dr. J. R. Epistles of St. Paul with Critical Notes. Conybeare and Howson. Life and Epistles of St. Paul. Dargan, Dr. E. C. Colossians, American Commentary. Denney, James. Thessalonians, The Expositor's Bible. DwiGHT, Dr. Timothy. Supplementary Notes, Meyer's Commentary. EhLlCOTT, Dr. C. J. Critical Commentary. Farrar, F. W. Life and Work of St. Paul. FiNDLAY, G. G. In Cambridge Bible. In Expositor's Bible. Hackett, Dr. H. B. Philemon, American Bible Union. Harvey, Dr. II. Pastoral Epistles and Philemon, American Commentary. Hoyt, Dr. AVayland. Gleams from Paul's Prison. HovEY, Dr. a. Galatians, American Commentary. Scriptural Divorce. Humphreys, A. E. Pastoral Epistles, Cambridge Bible. Huther, Dr. J. E. I. and II. Timothy and Titus, Meyer's Commentary. Johnson, Dr. F. Quotations of the New Testament from the Old, Lange, Dr. J. P. Commentary, translated from the German, LiLLiE, Dr. John. Thessalonians, Bible Union Revision, and in Lange. McLaren, Dr. A. Colossians and Philemon, Expositor's Bible. Meyer, Dr. H. A. W. Critical Commentary, translated from the German. MoiTLE, H. C. G. In Cambridge Bible. Neander, Dr. Augustus. Philippians, Mrs. H. C. Conant's translation. Olshausen, Dr. H. Biblical Commentary, Dr. Kendrick's translation. Perowne, Dr. E. H. Galatians, Cambridge Bible. PiDGE, Dr. J. B. GOUGH. Philippians, American Commentary. Plummer, Dr. A. Pastoral Epistles, Expositor's Bible. Ramsay, Prof. W. M. The Church and the Roman Empire before a. d. 70. St. Paul the Traveler and the Roman Citizen. Smith, Dr. .1. A. Ephesians, American Commentary. Stevens, Prof. W. A. Thessalonians, American Commentary. Stevens, Dr. G. B. Galatians, The Epistles of Paul. Trench, Dr. R. C. Synonyms of the New Testament. Turner, Dr. S. H. Galatians and Epliesians, Exegetical Commentary. Van Oosterzee, Dr. J. J. Pastoral Epistles, Lange's Commentary. Vincent, Dr. ^Marvin R. International Critical Commentary. Wiesinger, Aug. Philippians and Pastoral Epistles, in Olshausen. INTRODUCTION THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS The genuineness of this Epistle has generally been acknowledged ever since the first-known references to it in the second century. Paul's personality is so impressed upon it, an air of truthfulness so pervades every line, as to repel the very thought of forgery. A comparison with the other well-authenticated writ- ings of the apostles and with the independent account of Luke in the Acts, and with what we know from various sources of the character and circumstances of the persons addressed, forces the conclusion that we have here a genuine letter of the apostle to the Gentiles, It is its own witness, and its testimony has been admitted by even the most destructive of modern critics. This conclusion is confirmed by external testimony. Polycarp, Justin Martyr, Ignatius, and Athenagoras, all of the second century, quote or allude to this Epistle. It appears to have been in use by some Gnostics and by Marcion about the middle of the second century. It is contained in the early Syriac and Latin versions, implying an earlier original document of the first century. It is mentioned in the Muratorian fragment, probably not later than A. D. 170, and was used by Irenseus toward the end of the second century, and ever after- ward was regarded as the undoubted work of the Apostle Paul and as of ca- nonical authority. THE PERSONS ADDRESSED. The Epistle is addressed to " the churches of Galatia." The name is a contraction of Gallo and Grecia {Gallogrcecia), suggestive of the Gallic origin of those Celtic tribes which came from the region north of the Alps and west of the Rhine into Asia Minor 278 B. C, and of their mingling with the Greek population of Bithynia and Phrygia, and soon adopting the name of the con- venient and flexible Greek language. These invaders at first overran Asia Minor, but about 230 B. c. Attains, king of Pergamos, checked their ravages and confined them within the central portion of the peninsula. Still later, in 189 B. c, they fell under the power of the Eomans, who permitted them some self-rule under native chiefs. Thus there arose in central Asia Minor an Eastern Gaul, called by the Greeks, Galatia. Of somewhat uncertain limit, it may in general be said to have been bounded north by Paphlagonia, east by Pontus and Cappadocia, south by Lycaonia, and west by Phrygia and Bithynia. It had few cities, but chief among them was Ancyra, the emporium of the Eastern caravan trade, where there was situated a temple dedicated to the divinity of Augustus and Rome. Pessinus, another commercial city, was the home of the V vi THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIA>'S worship of Cybele, a most widely revered Phrygian goddess. Tavium, a third city, was a strong fortress and an emporium at the convergence of several im- portant roads. It has been supposed that in these cities were gathered " the churches of Galatia," and, as Doctor Lightfoot remarks, " perhaps also at Juliopolis, the ancient Gordium, formerly the capital of Phrygia, almost equi- distant from the three seas, and, from its central position, a busy mart." And Paul may not have gone so far east as Tavium, The Jews were numerous in these cities, attracted by the facility of trade, and under the Romans they en- joyed certain immunities and were permitted to live according to their own laws.i It must be noted here, that in the latter part of the first century B. C. the Romans granted to the last of the vassal Gallic kings territory farther south and west, and at his death, in 25 B. C, his kingdom was converted into a Roman province under the name of Galatia. This province included Galatia proper and portions of Pisidia, Phrygia, and Lycaonia. Prof. "W. M. Ramsay, in his "Church in the Roman Empire," maintains, in the light of recent discovery and from new investigations, that the Galatia of Paul's Epistle was the Roman province and the churches were those of Derbe, Lystra, Iconium, and Antioch of Pisidia, founded by Paul in his first missionary journey (Acts i3, u). This view may be styled the South Galatian theory, the other the North Galatian theorj'. In defense of the South Galatian theory, it is said that Paul went in his mis- sionary work to the great centers (or at least to the active centers) of Roman government and organization (the sole exception being Berea, which came in his course incidentally), traveling amid the surroundings of the first century, mentioning certain political divisions that existed only from a. D. 41 to 72, and never at any other period in history, and classifying his newly formed churches according to the recognized divisions of the Roman Empire. Thus he was in the habit of speaking of the churches either by the name of the city in which they were located, or, if in groups, by the name of the Roman province, unless " churches in Galatia " (Gai. i : 2: i Cor. le : i) be an exception. He never speaks of unofficial districts, such as Phrygia, Lycaonia, Pisidia, or Mysia. Moreover, in the collection for the poor saints at Jerusalem, in which it would seem that the " churches of Galatia " took part (i Cor. le : i), delegates from the contributing churches went with Paul to carry the gifts to Jerusalem. But those who accom- panied Paul (Acts 20 : 4) included representatives from southern Galatia, but none from northern Galatia. Besides, no passage in the New Testament men- tions any city of the northern district. Therefore, it is thought probable that the "churches of Galatia" were Derbe, Lystra, Iconium, and the Pisidian Antioch. The above view has, indeed, much to commend it. But for strong reasons the North Galatian theory has been held quite generally by eminent sdiolars, and is defended with great learning and ability by Dr. J. B. Lightfoot in his " Commentary on the Galatians." For two centuries before the existence of the Roman province of Galatia, the land of the Gauls in central Asia Minor, and its • Josephus, " Antiq.." B. XVI. 2 : 3. IXTRODUCTIOX Gallic people, had been known throughout the whole peninsula. So also were the names and the people of Lyeaonia and Pisidia equally familiar among the people. Writers who had themselves visited these places, in speaking of scenes in which they had taken part, would naturally use the names with which they had become familiar, and use such as would be distinctive. The churches of Xorth Galatia would be best distinguished from those of the south by their popu- lar and familiar name, Galatians. How natural for Paul thus to distinguish them! To the same eflfect is the fervent exclamation, "O foolish Galatians " (Gal. 3 : 1), in wliich the apostle would naturally use the popular and familiar name to which he had been accustomed in their own country. Again, analogy is strongly in favor of the popular use of the term. Mysia, Phrygia, Pisidia, are all "geographical expressions" destitute of any political significance, and as they occur in the same parts of the narrative with Galatia ( ^"^ts u : 24 ; le : 6-s . 18 : 23), it seems fair to infer that the latter is similarly used. The direct transi- tion, for instance, which we find from Galatia to Phrygia, is only explicable on the supposition that the two kindred terms are both alike used in a popular way. Moreover, Luke distinctly calls Lystra and Derbe "cities of Lyeaonia " (Acts 14 : 6) , while he no less distinctly assigns Antioch to Pisidia (Acts is : u), a con- vincing proof that in the language of the day they were not regarded as Gala- tian towns. Moreover, the narrative in Acts 16 appears to me to be inconsistent with the South Galatian theory. Notice that it was after Paul came to Derbe and Lystra and after the circumcision of Timothy that "they journeyed through the cities" (Acts 16 : 1-4), naturally those of southern Galatia, including Iconium and perhaps Antioch of Pisidia, and " delivered the decrees that had been decided upon by the apostles and elders who were in Jerusalem." After all this " they went through the Phrygian and Galatian country" (Acts le 6), Prof. Eam- say's rendering, " they passed through the Phrygo-Galatiau region," is not a translation but an interpretation. This and the similar phrase in Acts 18 : 23 (the names being in inverse order) indicate that two distinct portions of a country is designated, one the Galatian, east, the other the Phrygian, west. Ramsay himself feels the difficulty of harmonizing the narrative, and concludes that the text of Acts 16 : 6 must have been tampered w ith and adopts the inferior text. Luke's use of the Greek verb dienhotaai (5i«pxom«»0j go or pass through, should be noted. It occurs twenty-one times in the Acts, eighteen of which are used of preaching tours or of missionary journeys. In nine cases preach- ing or missionary work is asserted, in six implied. In Acts 18 : 23 Paul went through "the Galatian country and Phrygia (best text) in order, establishing all the disciples." This implies previous missionary work, which had been wrought when he journeyed, itinerating, through the communities of that coun- try, recorded in Acts 16 : 6. There is also much in the Epistle itself that favors the Xorth Galatian theory. Those addressed were evidently persons of restless, fickle temperament, a common characteristic of the Gallic tribes (i:6). Their eager acceptance of Christianity, their hearty welcome of Paul, their readiness to yield to per- viii THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS sonal influence, to run after new teachers, to adopt new doctrines and to be carried away by novelties, and also their partisan spirit, are well-known features in the character of the Gallic race. Superstitious practices, idolatry, the worship of Cybcle and Dionysus, and the presence and influence of Jews, all accord with what we know of northern Galatia. Mingled witb the Gallic people was a Phrygian element, as seen from their Cybelene idolatrous worship. There was also a Jewish element, both pure Jews and proselytes, for Paul uses the Old Testament Scriptures as familiar to them whom he addressed. There must have been also a prominent Greek element in tlie population, for the Epistle was written in the Greek language. The Roman element pertained to the government and was related to the metropolis of the world, and is hardly perceptible in these churches, or in this Epistle. The Galatians addressed were largely Gentile Christians (* = 8), converted from heathenism through the preaching of Paul (i : 8 ; 4 : is, i9). PAUL'S VISITS TO GALATIA. Only two visits of the apostle to Galatia are mentioned in the Acts. The first was in his second missionary journey, when having visited Derbe and Lystra and other cities, perhaps Iconium and Antioch of Pisidia,he passed through "the Phrygian and Galatian country" (Acts i6 : 6). This journey may have occupied the autumn of a. d. 51 and the winter of A. D. 52. The second visit mentioned ( Acts 18 : 23) probably occurred late in A. D. 54, in his third missionary journey, " going through the Galatian country and Phrygia in order, establishing the disciples." These visits arc generally regarded as the only two which Paul made to the Gala- tians. This, however, is not entirely certain. It is possible that Paul visited them on his first journey, about A, D. 46. For the object of his second missionary journey was to " visit the brethren in every city where we preached the word of tlie Lord and see how they do " (Acts is : 36). This supposition is also confirmed by Acts 14 : 6, 7, where Paul is found in Lycaonia, which bordered on Galatia proper. Moreover, in Acts 16 : 6, " the Phrygian and Galatian country " is not mentioned as visited for the first time, and the gospel then first preached there. And, finally, this supposition removes certain difficulties regarding the length of Paul's first missionary journey, which appears to have been from two to three years, and accords with it. According to this view Paul's first visit was a pro- posed short trip into the Galatian country, lengthened however by an attack of Itodily illness, which aftorded him an open door for preaching the gospel and for its joyful acceptance ((^ai- *; i3-i5). On his second visit he announced the decision of the apostolic conference at Jerusalem regarding circumcision (Acts is : 23-29; ir. : 4-6). A Jewish party may then liave arisen in tlie Galatian churches, which grew rapidly and called forth this Epistle not long after. Or, upon his third visit (A.^ts 18: 23) he may have found only the beginningofJudaizing teachings which, soon after his departure, developed into alarming proportions, and gave occasion to this Epistle. Mention of this theory of three visits as a possil)le one is made, while the aut!i(»r still inclines to the theory of two visits as the more probable. OCCASION AND DESIGN OF THE EPISTLE. Paul had from the first preached to them Christ and him crucified, and sal- INTRODUCTION vation through him by faith apart from the works of law (3 : i, 2). He had im- posed no Jewish ordinances (4 : 8-11 ; 5 : 3, 4). They received his message with joy (4 : 13-15), Avere baptized (s : 27), and enjoyed the presence of the Spirit (3:2). lu his second recorded visit he " strengthened " or " established all the disciples " (Acts 18: 23). But Judaizing teachers visited them and strove to induce them to incorporate the rites and ceremonies of Judaism with the spiritual truths and simple ordinances of Christianity. Possibly they may have begun their work before Paul's second recorded visit (1 : 9), but if so, they had succeeded but little (5: 7), But so active were they in disseminating their doctrines, that the Gala- tian churches became largely infected with them and seemed ready to adopt them (1 : 6 ; 3 : 1 ; 5 : 12). To this rcsult the previous religious conceptions of the Gala- tians probably contributed. Their worship of Cybele, which they had learned from the Phrygians, with its wild ceremonials and passionate orgies, might readily lead them to think that Christianity could alone be fully developed through symbolic rites and ceremonies. Already had they adopted Jewish feasts and fasts (4 : 10), and they appeared ready to yield to circumcision as of great importance to salvation. As these doctrines and practices were so directly opposed to those of Paul, it became necessary for these false teachers to deny his apostolic authority. They appear to have insinuated that he was not a divinely appointed apostle, but only a follower of the Twelve from whom he had learned Christianity and which he had perverted ; that he was at variance with Peter in regard to the relation of Jewish rites to the gospel ; and not always consistent with himself in regard to circumcision. This attempt of Judaizing teachers seemed at the point of success, when Paul heard of this state of things in the Galatian churches. He saw them removing from the gospel he had tauglit ; there was danger that his labor on them had been in vain ; yet hopeful, and with contidenee in the Lord, that he could stay this fearful tide of error, he immediately writes them (5 : 10). His purpose was to vindicate his apostolic authority, and his apostolic doctrine of justification by faith alone apart from works of law, to counteract the influ- ence of Judaizing teachers, and to call back and establish the Galatians in the simplicity of the gospel they had received. TIME AND PLACE OF WRITING. The exact date of this Epistle cannot be given, yet the time of its composi- tion can be placed within certain limits. Marcion, of the second century, speaks of it as the earliest of Paul's Epistles. But it must have been after the apostolic conference alluded to in 2 : 1, which occurred about A. D. 50. See note on this passage in Commentary. In 4 : 13 Paul refers to a first or former visit, implying that at least a second visit had been made to the Galatians when Paul wrote. If this latter visit was the second, mentioned in Acts 18 : 23, then the Epistle was written after A. D. 54. This is confirmed by Paul's reference to his encounter with Peter (see note on 2 : 11) which probably occurred in a. D. 54, during Paul's brief sojourn at Antioch after his second missionary journey. Upon the South Galatian theory, and also upon the theory of three visits by Paul to North Galatia, this Epistle was most likely written before Paul's third THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIAXS missionary journey, probably from Antioch, a. d. 54, in the interval between the second and third journeys. But neither of these theories, though possible, is sufticiently established. It seems, therefore, best to date the Epistle later than A. D. 54, after this visit to Antioch and after the visit to Galatia mentioned in Acts 18 : 23. But whatever the date of this Epistle, it is evident from its style, and its ex- pressions of astonishment and strong emotion, that it was written immediately upon hearing of the possible defection of the Galatians from the trutlis of the gospel. It also appears to have been written not long after a preceding visit (1 : 6. ou which see note) "I marvcl that ye are so quickly removing from him that called you." Some take the words so quickly in the sense of rashly, appealing to 2 Thess. 2 : 2, for that use of the -word ; but that passage is not decisive, and the words here refer more naturally to time than to manner. If Paul's first visit to the Galatians Was in the fall and winter of a. d. 51-52 and his second visit in the winters of A. D. 54-55, then he came to Ephesus in the spring of a. d. 55. Only three years then had elapsed since the Galatian conversions. The so quickly would hardly permit adding another two or three years, but would more naturally apply to a period of a few months. It was easy for Paul to hear at Epliesus from the Galatians. It seems fitting, therefore, to date the Epistle early in A. D. 56. THIS EPISTLE AND THAT TO THE ROMANS. These two Epistles are alike, yet unlike. They both teach salvation by free grace and justification by faith for both Jew and Gentile, and evangelical free- dom against legalistic bondage. They present similar lines of argument and in many places similar language. But Galatians dwells on a few points ; Romans on many. The former is a brief, rapid, though a pregnant sketch ; the latter is full and well-nigh exhaustive, including the doctrines of sin and sanctification. The one is polemical, a personal defense ; the other is didactic and experimental. This one is an impetuous onslaught against false doctrines and false teachers ; that is an elaborate treatise, a calm i^resentation of the doctrines and precepts of the gospel for willing and obedient disciples. On account of the resem- blance of Galatians to Romans, Conybeare and Howson, Dr. J. B. Lightfoot, and some others, infer that both were written about the same time, from Corinth, dur- ing the winter of a. D. 57-58. But on the other hand, it may be said that the verbal similarities of the two Epistles consist very largely in quotations from the Old Testament; and that the similarity in doctrine and trains of thought is no more than would be expected from one who was well grounded in the truth, and who had been taught by divine revelation. Indeed, we find similarity between these Epistles and Paul's earlier addresses. In that delivered at Antioch of Pisidia (about a. d. 46) we find the great doctrine of justification by faith (Acts 13: 38, 39). In his speech to the Lystrians (Acts u: is-n) he brings to view the accountability of the heathen, similar to that stated in Rom. 1 : 19; 2 : 15. No reliable argument, it seems to me, can be drawn for a late date for Galatians from these similarities. Yet it is possible that the necessity of writ- ing to the Galatians may have suggested the preparing of a fuller statement of doctrine to the Romans, thus anticipating error ])y the truth. Paul had long INTRODUCTION xi purposed to visit Rome (Rom. i : is). Early in A. D. 57 he was planning to go thither (Acts 19 : 21). It is not improbable that even then he began the Epistle which he completed a year later, and sent to Rome to prepare the way for liis coming. It bears the marks of discriminating thought and of being the mature product of calm reflection. PRACTICAL USES OF THE EPISTLE. This Epistle was a favorite one with Luther, which he used with telling effect against Romanism. It is an aggressive defense of the great doctrine of justification by faith apart from works of law, a doctrine which Luther declared to be the test of a standing or a falling church. It is of equal use to-day. The weapon that was so successful against the papacy has lost none of its edge, and is still needed. Formal and false religion is not to be opposed and overcome by outward display and a brilliant ritual, but by the spiritual truths which Paul preached. " The just shall live by faith," a motto for all time, must be made a fundamental doctrine in the system and practice of an overcoming Chris- tianity. The Epistle also presents the true ground of apostolic authority through Jesus Christ and God the Father. It establishes the apostleship of Paul, as one equal to any of the Twelve. It is an argument against apostolic succession and against any apostles except those personally called by Jesus Christ. It presents a harmony among the apostles and shows that there was no real antagonism in their teaching and practice, and records an amicable division of their work among Jews and Gentiles. It exhibits the law and the gospel in their relation to each other, their proper spheres and functions, not as contradictory and destructive of each other, but in perfect harmony and mutually helpful. The Epistle is valuable as his- tory, not only in regard to Paul and the apostolic churches, but also in reference to the oneness and development of the apostolic doctrine of the relation of the law to the gospel. It is valuable for its teachings on Christian freedom, its use and abuse. It is equally strong and forceful against a yoke of bondage on the one hand, and against license on the other. For all time it will stand as a warning against harmful entanglements and as an incentive to continual advancement. CONTENTS AND ANALYSIS. This Epistle falls naturally into three divisions of two chapters each. The tirst division is personal and defensive. Paul vindicates historically his apos- tolic commission and authority, and hence the gospel he preached. The second is doctrinal and argumentative, in which he presents the main subject of the Epistle, the doctrine of salvation by faith alone apart from the works of the law. The third part is hortatory and practical. He warns the Galatians against the abuse of Christian freedom and a perversion of his teachings. He inculcates duties especially needful to the Galatian converts, warns them against dangers to which they were exposed, and exhorts them to a holy life in the freedom of the sons of God. THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS A FULLER ANALYSIS. First Division. — Paul vindicates his apostolic authority and commission. Chapters 1 and 2. 1. Introduction, 1: 1-5. 2. The reproof. Occasion of the Epistle, 1 : 6-10. 3. Vindication of his preaching and authority as apostolic, 1 : 11-2 : 21. (a) His apostleship divinely given, independently of men, 1 : 11-24. (b) His apostleship recognized by the other apostles, 2: 1-10. (c) llis independent apostolic authority exercised and proved by his rebuke of Peter. The great doctrinal subject of the Epistle, justi- fication by faith alone, brought to the front, 2 : 11-21. Second Division.— Justification not by law, but by faith. Chapters 3 and 4. 1. First argument : From their own experience, 3 : 1-5. 2. Second argument : From Abraham's justifying faith, 3 : 6-9. 3. Tliird argument : From the law, which pronounces a curse, but cannot justify, 3 : 10-12. 4. Fourth argument : From what Christ has done in redeeming from the curse of the law, 3 : 12-14. 5. Fifth argument : From the fact that the Abrahamic covenant preceded the Mosaic law, 3 : 15-18. 6. Sixth argument : From the design of the law, 3 : 19-24. 7. Seventh argument: From what faith does for us, through which we receive sonship and unity in Christ, 3 : 25-29. 8. Illustrates and enforces upon the Galatians their freedom as sons, 4 : 1-31. (a) Christians not minors under the law, but sons and heirs of God, 4 : 1-7. (b) Danger of going back to legal bondage, 4 : 8-11. (c) Entreats them to return to true Christian freedom, 4 : 12-20 (d) Concluding argument from Hagar and Sarah as types of the law and the gospel, 4: 21-31. Third Division. — Practical application of the discussion, and of Christian freedom from circumcision. Chapters 5 and 6. 1. Hold fast to gospel freedom, lest interest in Christ be forfeited, 5 : 1-6. 2. Beware of beginning to depart from the right path, and of false teachers, 5: 7-12. 3. The proper use of Christian freedom ; the life and conduct required, 5 : 13-26. 4. The proper exercise of this freedom ; as to others and to ourselves, 6 : 1-10. 5. Postscript, 6: 11-18. (a) Writes with his own hand, 6 : 11. (b) False teachers, tlieir motive and their glorying, 6 : 12, 13. (c) The true ground of glorying, 6 : 14. (d) A new creature in Christ the essential tiling, 6 : 15, 16. (e) Deprecates further trouble ; closes with a benediction, 6 : 17, 18. THE EPISTLES OF THE IMPRISONMENT Prison literature, though quite inconsiderable, has greatly enriched the world. At its head, among uninspired productions, stands Bunyan's " Pilgrim's Progress"; and first among inspired writings of this class are Paul's Epistles of his captivity — Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and Philemon. His earlier Epistles were written during his active ministry as a missionary, while engaged in hand-to-hand combat with the powers of darkness and with error among his converts and opposers in and outside of the churches. Before and during their preparation he was favored with abundant revelations and a large exercise of spiritual gifts. But these later Epistles were prepared after several years of quiet prison life, during which he was restricted in his labors as a prisoner of the Lord, and was given opportunity for meditation and communings with God. And so these Epistles show a marked advance upon his earlier ones in Christian experience and growth in divine knowledge — in a closer spiritual union with Christ and a higher enjoyment and larger guidance of the Holy Spirit. The difference, however, in style and matter, between the Epistles of the Imprison- ment and those of the third missionary journey (Romans, Galatians, and 1 and 2 Corinthians), are no more marked than that between the latter and the Epistles of the second missionary journey (1 and 2 Thessalouians). All through his Epistles the apostle shows growth in grace and the knowledge of the truth. These " Christological Epistles," as they have been aptly called, while strongly emphasizing the great doctrines of salvation through the blood of the cross, bring clearly into view the higher doctrines of Christ and his work and our relation to him. Thus the Apostles Paul and John approach closely to each other in the same field of revelation. Christ is the equal with the Father, possessing the Divine fullness, the Creator of worlds, in whom all things subsist, and the Head over all things to the church. The church is his body, forming spiritually a new humanity ; its members are citizens of heaven, spiritually united in him and he in them. In Philippians we have the risen and ascended Christ, exalted above all created beings in heaven and on earth, and the members of the local church growing up into a full Christian manhood, and pressing joyfully on toward the prize of their high calling. In Ephesians we have the church universal, growing up into ideal perfection, forming ethically and spiritually the body of Christ, who is its head, in whom all its members, Jews and Gentiles, are united. In Colossians we view the universal headship of Christ over all creation and the church uni- versal, and his perfect mediatorship, rendering all other mediators between God and man unnecessary. In Philemon we behold how Christ works in the indi- vidual Christian in his relation to the family, society, the church, and the world. In these Epistles, as a whole we see the believer created a new man in Christ Jesus, living in the world yet not of the world, and in his union with Christ destined for an existence and state of holiness, purity, and glory. xiii THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS PAUL THE WRITER. The voice of antiquity is quite unanimous in ascribing this Epistle to the Apostle Paul. It remained for certain German critics to cast doubts upon its authorship. This was first done by Usteri and Schleiermacher. De AVctte, in 1826 and 1847, regarded it as a mere verbose expansion of Colossians. Baur maintained that both it and Colossians were of Gnostic origin, and ascribed them to the middle of the second century. But these and other assaults upon their Pauline authorship and authority have been abundantly answered by Meyer, Alford. Holtzmann, T. K. Abbott, and others. A careful and prayerful study of these Epistles will afford the student a sufficient answer to all such specula- tions. There will be as a result a growing conviction that no one but Paul could have been the writer. The Epistle begins with the greeting of Paul as its author. The first part is doctrinal and the last part is practical, after the manner of Paul. The style is that of Paul — broken sentences and parenthetic clauses, single words suggesting succeeding ideas, thoughts coming forth as from an overflowing fountain, and vehemence, modified indeed by the quiet meditation of prison life and the reflect- ive temper of advancing years. The intellectual strength and the powerful logic of the writer, his attitude toward Judaism, and his relation toward Gentiles, his doctrine of redemption through the cross and his oft-repeated idea, "in Christ," indicating his sense of personal union Avith Christ, are evidently Pauline. Who could have written this but the author of Galatians, Romans, and Corinthians? Xeither tradition nor history suggests any one of the first century who would be equal to the task ; nor is there known any writer of the second century of such liigh order of intellect as to produce such an Epistle. To suppose it a deliberate fabrication is morally, intellectually, and historically inconceivable. TO WHOM ADDRESSED. According to all extant manuscripts, except two in their uncorrected form, this Epistle is addressed " to the saints who are at Ephesus." But according to the two oldest manuscripts, the Vatican and Sinaitic of the fourth century, the words "in Ephesus" are omitted (though added by a later hand), and the Epistle is addressed "to the saints who are and the faithful in Christ Jesus," or possibly, "to the saints who are indeed faithful in Christ Jesus." Hence two general views have arisen as to the readers addressed : 1. The more an- cient one, that tlie Epistle was intended, at least primarily and principally, for the Ephesians. 2. The more modern one, that it was a circular letter to the churches of the province of Asia. In either case it should be noted that it is addressed, not to the church, but " to the saints." In favor of the second view, in addition to the two manuscripts already named, is a corrected manuscript of the twelfth century which also gives the xiv INTRODUCTION shorter reading, Tertullian, of the second and third centuries, states that the heretics, and especially Marcion, altered or falsified the title, making it read, "to the Laodiceans." This implies that there were manuscripts in the second century in which the words "in Ephesus" were wanting. Origen, of the third century, in his comment on this verse implies the same. Basil, of the fourth century, quotes the shorter text, without " in Ephesus," as that which had been " handed down," and which was " found in the more ancient copies." Jerome, of the fifth century, in his Commentary, alludes to the shorter read- ing, and Ambrosiaster, in his Commentary, ignores the reading "in Ephesus." Yet, notwithstanding this, it must be stated that Marcion was a bold and un- critical emendator ; that Tertullian held that the Epistle was inscribed to the Ephesians, relying " on the truth of the church" ; and that Origen, Basil, and Jerome regarded the Epistle as written to the Ephesians. It is also inferred from internal evidence that the Epistle was plainly not designed for the Ephesians. Thus Paul speaks of "having heard of your faith " (1 : 15), and he expresses a doubt, " But ye did not so learn Christ, if indeed ye heard him, and were taught in him, as the truth is in Jesus" (* : 20, 21), lan- guage that could not well be addressed to the Ephesians. But see notes on these passages. The Epistle is also mostly general throughout, with little local refer- ence, without expressions of endearment and familiarity, with no allusion to his past intercourse with the Ephesians, without salutations, and even with closing benedictions in the third person. These characteristics make a strong case. They make it evident, it is thought, that the destination of the Epistle was general and not particular as to the Ephesians, with whom he had labored for three years. The similarity of this Epistle to Colossians, and the name of Tychicus in both Epistles and his similar relation to each, is thought to indi- cate that this Epistle was destined for no narrower circle than the churches of the Roman province of Asia. Yet it should be noted, that Galatians, 2 Thessa- lonians and 1 Timothy are without personal salutations ; that Paul instructed Tychicus to "make known our aftairs" and "encourage your hearts" (6 : 22), that there were too many at Ephesus to salute in a single letter, and a selection of some would likely have given offense to others. Moreover, it may be said that if the Epistle had been intended for the churches in Asia, that Paul would natu- rally have addressed them as he did, "the churches in Galatia" (Gai- 1 : 2), or as he did "the church of God in Corinth . . . with all the saints who are in Achaia" (2 Cor. 1 : 1). What has been said in regard to Tychicus might be used in favor of Laodicea as the destination of the Epistle (Coi. * : le), yet that hardly seems probable, since none but ]\Iarcion and heretics have suggested it, and there is no manuscript or other evidence and authority for suggesting it. In favor of the first theory, that the Epistle was addressed to the Ephesians, it may be added to what has been already said, that all the ancient versions, the Syriac extending back to the second century, have the reading "at Ephesus." Every known manuscript has the title, "To the Ephesians," indicating a uni- form tradition. Indeed, in the early church the Epistle was universally regarded as addressed to the Ephesians. The only exception made to this is the refer- ence, as above, to heretics and Marcion, who held it to be addressed to the Laodi- THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS ceans. There is not a hint from the early church that it was a circular letter. Some think they see a local reference to the temple of Diana at Ephesus in 2 : 20-22. Others think they see a relation between our Lord's message to the Angel of the church in Ephesus, and especially to the words, "Thou hast left thy first love," and this Epistle, in which the experience of divine love and its results in the conduct of believers are markedly brought out and emphasized. So also some have noted a few similarities between this Epistle and Paul's charge to the Ephesian elders (Acts 20 : i*-35). Such expressions, for example, as " With all lowliness of mind" (occurring only in Acts 20 : 19; Eph. 4 : 2), and "inheritance among all them which are sanctified " (Acts 20 : 32 ; Eph. 1 : u, is ; comp. also Acts 20 : 2- ; Eph. 1 : 11 ; Act3 20 : 32 ; Eph. 2 : 20 ; 3 : 20). Othcrs havc notcd Several passages in the Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians, written about a. d. 110, in which there seems an allusion to this Epistle. Thus in chapter 1, Ignatius speaks of " the fulness 'the pleroma) of God the Father," of the church as " predestinated before the worlds" (comp. Eph. i :♦; 3 : i9j. In chapter 17 he speaks of "the Prince of this world " (Eph 2:2)^ and in chapter 20, he says, " ye all meet together in one faith and in one Jesus Christ" (Eph. 4:5). If the first theory is regarded as quite well established by other evidence, such allusions may be used as confirmatory. It seems from the foregoing that neither theory is established beyond all doubt. It appears evident that the Epistle was not a mere circular letter on the one hand, nor, on the other hand, that it was addressed exclusively to the Ephesians. With this agree Paul's apostolic labors at Ephesus. There, ac- cording to Luke, the apostle reasoned daily in the school of Tyrannus for two years, " so that all who dwelt in Asia heard the word of the Lord, both Jews and Gentiles." And Demetrius said, "that not only at Ephesus, but almost throughout all Asia, this Paul has persuaded and turned aside a great multitude, saying that they are not gods, which are made with hands " (Acts 19 : 10, 26). An examination of this Epistle shows also that it was addres.sed to Gentiles (J : n : 3 : 1). In addition, it should be remembered that Ephesus was the metropolis of the province of Asia, to which and from which went forth the currents of influ- ence, power, travel, commerce, and business. It was natural, therefore, that an Epistle, though addres.sed primarily to the Ephesians, would have a wider read- ing than merely at Ephesus; that one addressed principally to the Gentile converts of its chief city would be largely applicable to those of the province, and it was also natural that such an Epistle should be addres.sed primarily to the .saints of the church which occupied the leading position and the center of influence. It seems to me, therefore, that all the facts in the case are best met by the view that Paul primarily addressed the Gentile converts at Ephesus, intending the Epistle also for Gentile converts of other Asiatic churches. Copies of the letter sent to the churches of the province may have often omitted the exact original address, and hence the omi.ssion in the two most ancient manu- scripts. That these were corrected by a later hand shows the general voice of antiquity. TI.ME AND PLACE OF WRITING. This Epistle appears to have been written about the same time as the Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon, for in them all Paul speaks of himself as a IXTRODICTIOX prisoner (Epii- si; Coi. 4 : 13 ; PhUem. 9 )j and Ephesians and Colossians were both sent by Tychieus (Eph- 6 :ji; Col *: t), with whom was associated Onesimus, to the Colossians (,Col 4 : 9), the bearer of the Epistle to Philemon (Phiiem. 10). Some have referred these Epistles to Paul's imprisonment at Caesarea, but the reasons advanced by Meyer and others are far from being decisive. With far greater probability the majority of critics hold that they were written at Rome. At Ciesarea the apostle was the more strictly guarded, and only "his friends" were permirtei.1 to attend him (^cu 21 : 23) ; but at Rome he lived in his own hired house and received all who came to him (acu ss : so). This suits better the freedom of the preaching spoken of in Eph. 6 : 19, 20, and the visit of Onesimus to Paul. If the Epistle to the Philippians was the first of the Epistles of the captivity, as Lightfoot strongly argues, then we have in this another reason for believing that the Epistle to the Ephesians was written from Rome. Of Paul's companions mentioned in these Epistles, only two were probably with him at Ctesarea. Luke and Aristarchus, while the others would more probably be at Rome, the world's metropolis, where many of Paul's brethren previously had been sojourning. AVhether this Epistle was wrinen l>efore or after that to the Colossians is an open question. We may date it from Rome early in a. D. 63. RELATION' TO OTHER EPISTLES. The Epistle to the Ephesians is the snblimest of all Paul's Epistles. To the other Epistles of the Imprisonment it bears a relation similar to that which the Epistle to the Romans bears to the Galatian and the Corinthian Epistles. As Romans is the fullest and most systematic exposition of Christian truth of Paul's earlier writings, so Ephesians is the most complete exhibition of the highest and sublimest gospel doctrines, not only of his later but of all his Epis- tles. In some important respects it is akin to the Epistle to the Philippians, which Epistle forms a connecting link, as Lightfoot has shown, between these later and the earlier Epistles. The Philippian and the Ephesiau Epistles, for example, are one in their exhibition of the glory of the ascended Christ (Eph. 1 : !o-;3: Phfl. I : 9, 10) ; in kuowiug Christ (Ptiii- 3 : 10). and in knowing his love (Eph. s : 19) ; in recognizing the heavenly citizenship of believers (Eph. 5 : 19 Phu. s : M) ; in presenting "the gooii pleasure" or purpose of God (Eph. i:5: Phil. 2 : 15). and in describing a sacrifice well pleasing to God as "an odor of sweet smell " (Eph. 5 -. i; Phu. 4 : is). These remembrances, and others that might be added, show a relationship in expression, style, and thought l>etweeu these Epistles. But it is with the Colossians that the closest relationship of this Epistle is found. The two abound in many similar passages and verbal coincidences. They are twin sisters, but they difier. as they naturally would, from difi'erent designs, the different readers addressed, and the diflereut circumstances that called them forth. The Colossian Epistle is controversial, more direct and argumentative, briefer, and often more minute and definite ; the Ephesian Epistle is richer in language and fuller in expression and more exj)ansive in thought, the outburst of a heart filled with deep impressions of the sublime and glorious nature of the gospel of Clirist. The latter Epistle, as we have said, B THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS bears to the former a relation somewhat similar to that which Romans bears to Galatians. Lists of parallel passages are given by different expositors. Some of the more important parallels in doctrine and expression are the following: Redemption and forgiveness through Christ, Eph. 1:7; Col. 1 : 14. Christ the head of the church, his body, Eph. 1 : 22, 23 ; Col. 1 : 18. The pleroma, the fullness, Eph. 1 : 23 ; 3 : 19 ; Col. 1 : 19 ; 2:9. Their former Gentile condition, Eph. 2 : 1,12; Col. 1 : 21. Their present Christian condition, Eph. 2 : 5, 15, 16 ; Col. 2 : 13, 14. Paul's stewardship as a minister, Eph. 3 : 2, 7 ; Col. 1 : 23, 25. The mystery— the gospel for Gentiles, Eph. 3 : 8 ff. ; Col. 1 : 26, 27. Rooted in Christ, Eph. 3 : 18 ; Col. 2 : 7. Sins to 1)e shunned, Eph. 5:3-6; Col. 3 : 5-8. Buying up the opportunity, Eph. 5 : 16 ; Col. 4 : 5. Spiritual songs, Eph. 5 : 19 ; Col. 3 : 16. Duties of wives, husbands, children, etc., Eph. 5 : 22,25-6 : 9 ; Col. 3 : 15- 4: 1. Prayer enjoined, especially for himself, Eph. 6 : 18-20 ; Col. 4 : 2-4. Tychicus, his character and mission, Eph. 6 : 21, 22; Col. 4 : 7, 8. The differences in the two Epistles appear: 1. In the polemical character of Colossians, as seen in 2 : 8-23. 2. In the different position, use, and appli- cation of certain words and expressions common to both. 3. In the promi- nence given to the church, to Christ, and the Holy Spirit. In Ephesians Paul makes the general and ideal church the most prominent ; in Colossians Christ is the cause and head of the whole created universe. The work of the Holy Spirit is prominent in Ephesians, but is quite passed over in Colossians, the only clear reference to the Holy Spirit being in Col. 1:8. 4. Characteristic phrases, such as " the heavenlies," occur five times in Ephesians but not once in Colossians. So " grace " is a far more prominent and leading word in Ephe- sians than in Colossians. 5. Ephesians is more general and is fuller, having sections peculiar to itself, such as the foreordained holiness and unity of the Redeemer (i = 3-u) ; the essential unity of the saints (* : "-u) ; deeds of darkness and light contrasted (» : t-u) ; marriage illustrated by Christ and his church (5 : 23-33) ; the Christian armor (6 : lo-n). Such close similarities and great differ- ences are a strong proof that both Epistles were from the same hand. One is evidently not borrowed from the other. The same writer under different con- ditions would naturally show such dissimilarities and resemblances. Compare Paley's " JTorce Paulince." While it appears evident that these two Epistles were written at nearly the same time, it Avill always remain an open question as to which of the two was written first. Dean Alford gives precedence to Colossians. His theory is a beautiful one. It seems natural that after the apostle— his mind full of the glories of Christ and the consequent glorious privileges of believers — had written the Colossians pointedly and polemically against certain errors which were threatening the church, he should have thought of the ideal church, which con- ception could be only realized in the i>erfeeted church universal, and recalling INTRODUCTION to mind the Ephesian church, in which he had labored so successfully and lov- ingly, he writes to its members and others connected with them. In all of the fullness of the Spirit's promptings and revelations and in overflowing language he pours out his soul on the great theme of the church as the body and spouse of Christ. Quite a close relation also exists between this Epistle and the First Epistle of Peter. Among the many similarities are the following : " Blessed be the God and Father," etc., Eph. 1 : 3 ; 1 Peter 1 : 3. Christ at God's right hand over all, Eph. 1 : 20-22 ; 1 Peter 3 : 22. The hope, inheritance, power of God, ftiith, Eph. 1 : 18-20; 1 Peter 1 : 3-5. Believers on a living foundation, Eph. 2 : 18-22 ; 1 Peter 1 : 4-6. Prophecies not clearly known to the prophets themselves, Eph. 3 : 5, 10 ; 1 Peter 1 : 10-12. Many other verbal resemblances might be adduced. These similarities, however, are not such, it seems to me, as to lead to the supposition that either writer copied from the other. Certain resemblances have also been observed between First Peter and the twelfth and thirteenth chapters of Romans. These parallelisms may be explained : 1. Peter may have read or heard read the whole or portions of these Epistles, which were written from three to seven years previously. (Comp. 2 Peter 3 : 15.) 2. Silvauus, who composed 1 Peter under the direction of the apostle, in his intercourse with him may have impressed him with Paul's thoughts and language. 3. Peter probably met Paul after his im- prisonment and was deeply impressed with his conversation and discourses. Peter, with his very sympathetic nature, would be easily impressed by such a strong, vehement mind as that of Paul. 4. The oneness of the Holy Spirit's guidance into all the truth. A relation between this Epistle and that to the Hebrews has been noted. Their Christ ology is the same. So also are such expressions as the following : In him we have redemption through his blood ( Rp'i- i : " ; Heb. 9 : 12), having delivered himself up, in order that we might be sanctified (Kpii, 5:25, 26; Heb. 10 : lO; 13 : 12)^ in whom we have boldness of access (Kph. 3 : 12 ; Heb. 4 : le). If the Epistle to the Hebrews was not inspired by Paul, or written under his direction, it is certainly Pauline. We have elsewhere noted that this Epistle enters the highest realm with the Gospel of John, and perhaps comes into contact with Revelation in the message to the church at Ephesus. It is very possible that Paul came under the personal influence of John at his last visit at Jerusalem and during his imprisonment at Cffisarea, OCCASION, DESIGN, AND CONTENTS. There is nothing in the Epistle to indicate what occasioned it, except the mention of Tychicus, who was of Asia and very probably of Ephesus. He had been for a time with Paul and was about to return as bearer of the Epistle to the Colossians. As he would also visit Ephesus and its vicinity the apostle improves the opportunity of writing to the brethren residing at Ephesus. Viewing the thp: epistle to the ephesiaxs saints there, gathered mostly from Gentiles he sees in them a type or sample of the church universal, the body of Christ, composed of Gentiles as well as Jews. He enlarges upon tlie glories of Christ and the blessedness of salvation, and enforces upon them Christian unity and practical duties in the various relations of life. The first tiiree chapters are chiefly doctrinal ; the last three mainly practical. GENERAL ANALYSIS. First Part.— Doctrinal. Tlie glory and unity of the church as the body of Christ, 1:1-3: 21. Salutation. Writer and Readers, 1 : 1, 2. I. Ascription of Praise to God, 1 : 3-14. 1. For the blessing and adoption of the elect in Christ, 1 : 3-6. 2. For the redemption through his blood, 1:7,8. 3. For making known the mystery of his will, 1 : 9, 10. 4. For being cliosen as God's heritage, 1 : 11, 12. 5. For their unity in Christ, both Jews and Gentiles, 1 : 13, 14. II. Prayer for his readers, 1 : 15-23. 1. Tlianks for the faith of his readers, 1 : 15, 16. 2. Prayer for their further enlightenment, 1 : 17, 18. 3. To understand more fully the glory of Christ, 1 : 19-21. 4. That he is the head over all things to the church, 1 : 22. 5. Tlie church the fullness of Christ, 1 : 23. III. God's power exhibited in the regeneration of the Ephesians, 2 : 1-10. 1. Their former condition of spiritual death, 2 : 1-3. 2. Their present condition — made alive through grace, 2 : 4-6. 3. Their future prospects— exalted with Christ, 2 : 6, 7. 4. Display of God's purpose, power, and grace, 2 : 8-10. IV. Regeneration of the Ephesians further considered, 2 : 11-22. 1. Reminded of their former condition as heathen, 2 : 11, 12. 2. Once for off, but now near through the blood of Christ, 2 : 13. 3. Christ has broken down the middle wall of partition, 2 : 14, 15. 4. Jews and Gentiles united in one fellowship, 2 : 16-18. 5. Gentile believers fellow-citizens witli the saints, 2 : 19. 6. A spiritual and ever-growing temple of God, 2 : 20-22. V. Paul a prisoner for, and his commission to the Gentiles, 3 : 1-13. 1. His apostolic commission to the Gentiles, 3 : 1-3. 2. The mystery revealed to him, 3 : 4, 5. 3. The mystery : Gentiles joint heirs and joint partakers, 3 : 6. 4. The proclamation of this universal gospel committed to him, 3 : 7-9. 5. The manifold wisdom of God, 3 : 10. 6. The purpose of the ages, purposed in Christ, 3:11. 7. An encouragement to Gentiles to boldness and confidence, 3 : 12, 13. VI. His prayer for their growth and strength in the Christian life, 3 : 14-21. 1. That they be strengthened as to the inner man, 3 : 14-16. 2. That Christ mav dwell witliin them, 3 : 17. INTRODUCTION 3. That they may know the surpassing love of Christ, 3 : 18. 4. And be filled unto all the fullness of God, 3 : 19. 5. A doxology of praise and glory to God forever, 3 : 20, 21. Second Part.— Practical, 4 : 1-6 : 24. I. Exhortations especially to Gentile believers to make this unity and equality a reality, 4 : 1-24. 1. To walk worthy of their calling, 4:1,2. 2. And keep the unity of the Spirit, 4 : 3. 3. Since the church is essentially one body, 4 : 4-6. 4. But with a variety of gifts, variously distributed, 4 : 7-11. 5. Harmoniously united for present and future unity, 4 : 12, 13. 6. And for maturity in knowledge, love, and spiritual stature, 4 : 14-16. 7. Therefore walk no longer after the manner of Gentiles, 4 : 17-19. 8. Since they had not so learned Christ, 4 : 20, 21. 9. They should put off the old man and put on the new, 4 : 22-24. II. Special precepts for Christian living, growing out of the foregoing admoni- tions, 4 : 25-5 : 20. 1. Heathenish vices and practices must be laid aside, 4 : 25-29. 2. Practise truthfulness, kindness, honesty, purity, 4 : 25-29. 3. And grieve not the Holy Spirit, 4 : 30. 4. But put away all bitterness and all malice, 4 : 31. 5. And exercise patience and forgiveness, 4 : 32. 6. Imitate God and walk in love, 5 : 1, 2. 7. Duties toward themselves. Personal purity, 5 : 3-7. 8. Walk as children of light, 5 : 8-14. 9. Wisely and circumspectly, 5 : 15-17. 10. Filled with the Spirit, with spiritual songs, 5 : 18-20. III. Duties of the married state and of the family, 5 : 21-6 : 9. 1. Of wives to their husbands, 5 : 21-24. 2. Of husbands to their wives, 5 : 25-32. 3. (Christ and the church, 5 : 25-30.) 4. Of children to their parents, 6 : 1-3. 5. Of parents to their children, 6 : 4. 6. Of servants and masters, 6 : 5-9. IV. Closing words and exhortations, 6 : 10-24. 1. Be strong. The conflict and the enemy, 6 : 10-12. 2. Description of the Christian armor, 6 : 13-17. 3. Requests prayers, especially for himself, 6 : 18-20. 4. His message through Tychicus, 6 : 21, 22. 5. Salutation and benediction, 6 : 23, 24. THE EPISTLE TO THE PHILIPPIANS PHILIPPI. Philippi was a city of Thrace, in eastern Macedonia, between the rivers Strymon and Nestus. It was originally called Krenidcs, meaning "Little Fountains," from the numerous springs which arose in the mountains on the north. It was celebrated for its neighboring gold and silver mines, to secure which Philip, the father of Alexander the Great, took it in 356 B. C. and called it Philippi, after himself. In B. C. 42 a memorable battle was fought here, in which the republican forces under Brutus and Cassius were defeated by Octa- vius and Anthony. Octavius, who afterward became Augustus, made it a Roman colony and bestowed upon it certain rights of citizenship and proprietor- ship. As it was a colony and a city of rank it could well be styled "a chief city of the district of Macedonia." (See note ou Acts le : 12, 13.) It is distinguished as the first city in Europe in which Paul preached. He found no synagogue, but a place of prayer by the riverside without the city, the Gangas, a tributary of the Strymon. Here he preached. Lydia and others were converted, and a church was gathered, probably in the spring of A. D. 52. Paul subsequently visited it in the summer or autumn of A. D. 57, and again in the spring of a. d. 58. Luke appears to have spent some of his time here during this intervening period (Acts 16: 12; 20:6). The church at Philippi generously contributed to Paul's support (2 cor. 11 :9; Phil. 4 : 16) and to the poor of the saints at Jerusalem (2 Cor. 8 : 1-5). It contiuucd to flourish long after the apostolic days. Tertullian speaks of it as maintaining the apostle's doctrines and reading publicly his Epis- tles. After Macedonia was conquered by the Turks the church declined and passed out of existence. It still lives through its Scripture history, its best memorial being this Epistle. The place itself is now a heap of ruins. authorship and ixtegrity of the epistle. The testimony of early Christian literature is unanimous in ascribing this Epistle to the Apostle Paul. It was regarded as Paul's in the canon of the heretic Marcion and of the Muratorian fragment, as well as by the old Latin ajid earliest Syriac versions. It was recognized by Pol yea rp in his letter to the Philippians, and by Irenieus and Clement of Alexandria, Origen and Eusebius, and Christian writers generally after them used it as a work of Paul. Its genu- ineness, however, has been assailed by Baur and several others. But their criticisms have been ably refuted by Liinemann, A. Ilarnack, "Weiss, and others. " The Epistle completely reflects St. Paul's mind and character even in their finest shades " (Lightfoot). It has also been held by some that we have two letters in this Epistle. This theory rests mainly on the assumption that the " finally " of 3 : 1 indicates an intention of closing the letter. Yet some others hold that this expression implies a former and lost Philippian letter. But in a familiar Epistle to a beloved chuicli, informal and unsystematic and overflow- x.xii INTRODUCTION ing with personal feeling, it was perfectly natural that the apostle should pass abruptly from one theme to another. (See notes ou 3 : i. 2.) " There seems to be, therefore, no sufficient grounds for disputing the integrity of the Epistle. If the partition theory is admitted, the attempt to fix the dividing line must be regarded as hopeless in the face of the differences between critics " (M. R. Vin- cent, "The International Critical Commentary"). TIME AND PLACE. It is now generally conceded that this Epistle was Avritten from Rome during the imprisonment related in Acts 28 : 30, 31. Paulus, Meyer, and a few others, have placed its composition at Ciesarea, but this view has been mostly abandoned, as it is not sustained by any indications furnished by the Epistle. The notice of "Caesar's household" ( 4:22) points to Rome rather than to Ciesarea. So does also Paul's expectation of a speedy decision in his case (2 : 23) ^ and his strait between life and death (1 : 21-23)^ and his hope of returning to Philippi in case of his liberation. At Ciesarea he was looking, not toward Philippi but toward Rome (Acts 23 : n), and as a last resort he could appeal to Ciesar. The progress of the gospel and the Pretoriau guard (1 = 12-14) clearly point to Rome as the place of greater importance and the newer field for the gospel. The allusions in the Epistle imply an area of influence too extensive for Csesarea, but amply fulfilled at Rome. A more difficult question arises : Was this Epistle written early or late in Paul's two years of Roman captivity? Was it before or after Ep/iesians, Colos- sians, and Philemon, which are plainly to be grouped together? The majority of the critics assign it to the later period (Meyer, Alford, Ellicott, Godet, etc.). But Lightfoot, Farrar, and Moule prefer the earlier date. Vincent inclines to the later. The question cannot be decided with certainty. That it was written some time after Paul's arrival at Rome seems probable : (1) From the great progress the gospel had made at Rome (i:i2-u: 4:22). (2) From the fact that the Philippians had heard of his imprisonment, had raised and sent their contribution to him by Epaphroditus, had heard of Epaphroditus' sickness, the effect of which news on them had come back to Epaphroditus, thus necessitating four journeys of seven hundred miles, the dis- tance between Philippi and Rome. The time for these journeys, for the raising of the money, for his stay with Paul, and for his sickness, must have covered a period of several months, perhaps more than a year. It is possible that Epaph- roditus may have gone to Rome in the autumn of A. D. 61, but it is just as probable that he went there with the opening of navigation in the spring of A. D. 62. (3) It is said that the Epistle indicates sadness and a stricter confine- ment. But this is pure fancy ; the Epistle is joyful and hopeful. (4) It is noted that the names of Luke and Aristarchus, Avho sailed from Caesarea with Paul (Acts 27 : 2) are not mentioned in this Epistle, though they both appear in Colossians and Philemon. It is dangerous to argue from silence. They may have been away temporarily from the city on private business or missionary duty. We can only infer that this Epistle was not written at the time of the others. (Comp. note on 2:20,21.) (5) The expectation of a speedy release xxiv THE EPISTLE TO THE PHILIPPIANS (2 : 21). But he writes in even stronger terms to Philemon (22). And in Philip- plans (2 : 19) he expects to send Timothy before he comes himself. For the earlier date Lightfoot urges that the style and tone of this Epistle resembles more the earlier Epistles than it does those to the Colossians and the Ephesians; that it represents the transition from the conflict with Pharisaic Judaism to that with the incipient gnosticism of the Asiatic churches. This, however, does not necessarily follow. How simple in tone and style is Phile- mon, and how free from all indications of doctrinal error, though manifestly written at the same time as the Colossians. The character and surroundings of each church addressed would naturally determine the tone of the Epistle. The doctrines and errors discussed would largely determine the style and manner of treatment. It is evident from the three Epistles that the brethren respectively addressed were ditierently affected doctrinally and needed different treatment. "We cannot trace accurately Christian, or heretical church development among brethren so widely and ditierently situated as were those in the Macedonia and Asiatic churches. This Epistle most truly holds an intermediate position, both doctrinally and logically between Romans and other earlier Epistles on the one hand and Ephe- sians and Colossians on the other. Yet there is nothing in this Epistle that de- mands either an earlier or a later date. The probability, however, that Epaph- roditus did not arrive later than the spring of A. D. 62, and the time neces- sary for his visit and labors with the apostle, for his sickness and recovery and his return before winter, all this leads me to prefer the autumn of A. D. 62 as the more probable date. The other Epistles may have been written a little later. RELATION TO OTHER EPISTLES. This has been referred to in the preceding section, and in the Introduction to the Epistle to the Ephesians. The Epistle to the Philippians resembles the Ephesians in the freedom of spontaneous thought and impassioned prayer, and both Ephesians and Colossians in penetrating into the heights and depths of the Divine counsels. Of the earlier Epistles it resembles First Thessalonians in ex- pressions of strong personal attachment and in its unofficial salutations and greetings and its absence of appeals to apostolic authority. It resembles Second Corinthians in its torrent (but less strong) of personal feeling and its conse- quent unsystematic plan and treatment. It is in strong contrast to the severe tone, censure, and argument of Galatians, but resembles it in its opposition to Judaic formalism and Antinomian license, and in its doctrine of justification and the righteousness which is from God. But it reseml)les Romans more than it does any other earlier Epistle, not so much in formulated statements of doctrine as in allusions and incidental references to the great fundamental truths of the gospel. Of the parallels of thought and expression Lightfoot presents the fol- lowing: Longing for them. God his witness, Phil. 1 : 3-8 ; Rom. 1 : 8-11. Approving things excellent, Phil. 1 : 10; Rom. 2 : 18. Christ's death and exaltation, Phil. 2 : 8-11 ; Rom. 14 : 9-11. Practising humility, Phil. 2 : 2, 3 ; Rom. 12 : 16-19, IXTRODUCTIOX Preferring one another, Phil. 2 : 3, 4; Koni. 12 : 10. The true circumcision exulting in Christ, Phil. 3:3; Kom. 1:9; 2 : 28; 5: 11. Paul an Israelite, Phil. 3:5; Rom. 11:1. A righteousness of works, and the righteousness of faith, Phil. 3:9; Rom. 10 : 3 ; 9 : 31, 32. Conformed to Christ's death and resurrection, Phil. 3 : 10, 11 ; Rom. 6 : 5. Conformed to Christ's image, Phil. 3 : 21 ; Rom. 8 : 29. The sensual and their end, Phil. 3 : 19 ; Rom. 6 : 21 ; 16 : 18. A sacrifice well-pleasing to God, Phil. 4 : 18 ; Rom. 12 : 1. OCCASION AND OBJECT. The immediate occasion of this Epistle was the sending back to the Philip- pians of Epaphroditus, who had been the bearer of their messages and contribu- tions (2 : 25 ; 4 : 10, 18). Either fi'om the hardship of the journey or from over-ex- ertion in gospel labors with Paul at Rome, or from malaria and climatic causes, he hecame dangerously ill (2 : 27. 30). On recovery, learning that the Philippians had heard of his severe sickness, he was anxious to return in order to allay their fears, besides having the longings for home natural to an invalid in a foreign land (2 : 26). Paul therefore sent him back and sent this Epistle by him (2 : 25. 28). His object in writing was, first, to acknowledge their liberality (1 = 3; * = 10-20) ; secondly, to give information concerning his own condition, his success in preaching the gospel and other matters of interest to them ; thirdly, to give such instructions in the gospel and cautions against errorists, and such admonitions as might be necessary for their Christian unity and establishment in the faith, and to regulate their conduct toward each other and toward unbelievers. CHARACTER AND CONTENTS. This Epistle is a familiar, friendly letter to a loved and loving church of the apostle's own planting. Its characteristics are: 1. Ethical rather than doctri- nal. Yet it does not descend into a mere code of morals. In the enforcement of great Christian precepts the apostle weaves into his exhortation great doctrines, as Christ's humiliation and exaltation, or salvation by grace in contrast to sal- vation through the law. But in all his allusions to doctrine it is for a practical purpose. 2. VsiuVs, personality. Thispersonalelement isseen inThessalonians, and most strongly in Second Corinthians. But in this Epistle we see most clearly the heart of Paul in a calm, unruffled state, unaffected by troubles within and outside of the churches. It reflects his large sympathy, his spiritual power, and his consecrated life and experience as one who counted all things but loss for Christ, ever striving after larger attainments. 3. Affectionate tenderness and confidence. The harmonious relation between Paul and the Philippians for ten years, and their repeated remembrance of him in ministering to his wants, con- tributed to this. It is the most interesting and delightful of all his Epistles. Not the slightest censure is implied or expressed against the church or any member of it, unless it be as some have erroneously supposed in 2 : 30, or in 4 : 10 where, if any is implied, it is immediately withdrawn, and in a manner amounting to a THE EPISTLE TO THE PHILIPPIANS compliment. 4. Joyousness. From beginning to end it throbs with spiritual joy. In the dungeon at Philippi Paul and Silas sang songs in the night; and in this Epistle the echo is heard coming forth from Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ at Home. It is like a piece of music whose keynote is joy and its most t'xultant strain is, "Rejoice in the Lord always, and again I say rejoice." The plan of this Epistle is general, and exhibits the freedom of epistolary correspondence. It may be analyzed as follows : I. Introduction, 1 : 1-11. 1. Salutation, 1 : 1, 2. 2. Thanksgiving and prayer for the Philippians, 1 : 3-11. II. Paul's present circumstances and feelings at Rome, 1 : 12-26. 1. Encouragement. Progress of the gospel, 1 : 12-14. 2. Trials. Motives for, and manner of preaching Christ, 1 : 15-18. 3. Expectation. Their salvation, and Christ magnified through him, 1 : 19, 20. 4. Hopes, in life or death ; yet assured of seeing them again, 1 : 21-26. III. Exhortation to unity, self-denial, and a godly life, 1 : 27-2 : 18. 1. "Walk worthily in unity, in firmness and boldness, 1 : 27-30. 2. Have unity, humility, and unselfishness, 2 : 1-4. 3. After the example of Christ, 2 : 5-11. 4. Persevere in holy obedience, 2 : 12, 13. 5. Be lights in the world and cheer the apostle's heart, 2 : 14-18. IV. Paul's co-laborers, his intended movements, 2 : 19-30. 1. Hopes to send Timothy, 2 : 19-23. 2. Also trusts that he will come himself, 2 : 24. 3. Must also send Epaphroditus, 2 : 25. 4. Illness, recovery, and mission of Epaphroditus, 2 : 26-30. V. "Warning against Judaizing teachers. His own experience and example, 3 : 1-21. 1. Exercise Christian joy, 3 : 1. 2. An abrupt transition; warning against Judaizers, 3 : 2, 3. 3. He himself once adhered to Judaism, 3 : 4-6. 4. His own Christian experience ; renounced all for Christ, 3 : 7-11. 5. The end he had in view ; the prize, 3 : 12-14. 6. Let each one walk according to his attainments, 3 : 15, 16. 7. Imitate him ; beware how they diverge from the right path, 3 : 17-19. 8. Appeals to their heavenly citizenship, 3 : 20, 21. VI. Concluding exliortations, thanks, and salutations, 4 : 1-23. 1. Exhorts to steadfastness, unity, joy, self-forgetfulness, and prayer, 4 : 1-7. 2. And to a pure and lofty Christian morality, 4 : 8, 9. 3. Thanks the Philippians for their gifts, 4 : 10-20. 4. Salutations and benediction, 4 : 21-23. THE EPISTLE TO THE COLOSSIANS CITY AND THE CHURCH AT COLOSSiE. Colossse was a Phrygian city, situated ou the river Lyeus about twelve miles above Laodicea and Hierapolis, two important cities about six miles distant from each other, but now marked by extensive ruins. Colosste in ancient days was a place of considerable importance, standing on the military route from the Euphrates to the west. Herodotus speaks of it as " a large city," and Xenophon as " populous and prosperous and large." It afterward declined in size and im- portance. The geographer Strabo, about the Christian era, reckoijs it as a small town, and Ptolemy, about A. D. 140, omits it from among the cities of that region. It has long been in ruins. It has fewer of these than its sister cities, but con- siderable blocks of stone, foundations of buildings, broken columns, and broken pottery are found. Variation occurs in the spellings of the name. Some ancient documents have Colosste ; others Colassse. The latter may have been a provin- cialism. The former appears upon coins and mostly in classical authors, and seems to be the correct form. The church at Colossje was not founded by Paul, but probably by one of his converts, Epaphras (i : ^), during Paul's three years' ministry at Ephesus, A. D. 54-57. Paul appears never to have visited it. In this both Lightfoot and Ramsay are agreed. This may account for the address of the Epistle, it being not to the church, but to the saints and brethren. But Renan thinks that Paul in going "through the regions of Galatia and Phrygia in order" (Acts is : 23) passed through the valley of the Lycus, without preaching there. But this seems hardly consistent with Col. 2 : 1. Doubtless, during his labors at Ephesus and afterward as a prisoner, Paul had seen representatives of this community of believers. He thought of them more as individuals than a church. Both they and Epaphras appear to have been Gentile converts (1 : 21, 27; 2 : is). There is no hint to the contrary in the Epistle. Yet they were exposed to Jewish in- fluences. Lightfoot estimates that there were not less than eleven thousand Jewish adult freemen in the district of Laodicea at this time. AUTHORSHIP OF THE EPISTLE. This Epistle names the Apostle Paul as its author (1 : 1 ; i ■ is). This is con- firmed by references to his ministry among the Gentiles (1 = 23), to his sufferings in their behalf (1 : 24)^ to his imprisonment (* : 3. 10, is), and to his well-known friends, such as Timothy (^ : 1), Luke and Demas (* : 1*), Epaphras (1 • t), Tychicus, Mark, and Onesimus (1 : i-io). The external evidence for its Pauline authorship is abundant. It is named in the Muratorian Canon (before A. D. 170). Irenseus of Lyons about the same time quotes from "the Epistle written to the Colossians." Quotations and allusions to it are made by Justin Martyr of Palestine (a. d. 110-170), and Ignatius (about A. D. 110). Marcion, the earliest heretical critic, contemporaneous with Justin, accepted it as an Epistle of Paul. So also a little later in the second century, or early in the third, Origen xxvii xxviii THE EPISTLE TO THE CUL0SjS1A>'S of Alexandria, Clement of Alexandria, and Tertullian of Carthage quote fre- quently from this Epistle. Until the present century it has been universally accepted as a production of the Apostle Paul. The tirst to assail the genuineness of this Epistle was Mayerhoff (1838), who attempted to show that it was an abridgment of Ephesians in the second cen- tury, directed against the Corinthians. He was followed by Baur (1845), who regarded it as an attempt to introduce the Alexandrian logos-teaching into the teaching of Paul with reference to the Ebionites, who held Jesus to be inerely human temporarily possessed by Christ. Many other critics followed their lead, with varying theories, but Avithout agreement among themselves. Objections against the Epistle are made on account of style and vocabulary, and dilierences fnuu Paul in thought and expression. But several years had elapsed since Paul wrote the four great Epistles of his third missionary journey. There was abundant time for differences in the vocabulary, expressions of thought, development of doctrine from new experiences and revelations, and from con- tact with different peoples and surroundings. So, also, as false doctrines and per- plexing questions gave a distinct coloring and development of the Epistles to the Corinthians, Galatians, and Romans, so the heresy at Colossse determined largely the style, vocabulary, and thought of the Epistle to the Colossians. Paul would have been a dull scholar indeed, if, after meeting these errors for several years, and at the same time under the guidance of the Spirit, he could not find thought and language to meet them. As somewhat analogous, it has been re- marked that Xenophon exhibits a great variety of diction in his different books. Such objections have been answered and the Epistle defended by Weiss, Meyer, Alford, Soden, Abbott, and others. Even Px,enan admits its genuineness, with that of Philemon, as the work of Paul. The relation of the letter of Philemon to that to the Colossians is such, that the undoubted genuineness of the latter is a strong evidence of the genuineness of the former. THE FALSE TEACHERS AND TEACHING AT COLOSSiE. The Epistle indicates that certain erroneous doctrines were besetting the faith of the Colossians. What these were must be inferred from the doctrine especially emphasized as well as from the errors opposed. Some of them appear to have been of Jewish origin, such as circumcision, obligation to keep the law, and ritualistic observances in food, drink, feasts, and Sabbaths (2 : ii. u, le). It appears that these were urged upon them, not as a necessity, but rather as de- sirable and beneficial. There seems not to have been at Colossje the strength or growth of the Galatian heresy which called forth the great protest and argument in the Epistle to the Galatians. Others of these erroneous teachings appear to have been non-Judaic in origin, such as " philosophy and vain deceit," an in- tellectual exclusiveness, mysteries, wisdom reserved for a few, the doctrine and worship of angels, and ascetic rules of life (2 : 16-23). Some critics assume that these two elements of error were independent of each other, but concurrent, the one ritualistic and the other speculative. But if independent they might have been somewhat antagonistic, of which there is no sign. The careful reader of the Epistle, especially of 2 : 8-23, will observe INTRODUCTIOX but one general heresy with varying phases. " The two elements are so closely interwoven in his refutation, that it is impossible to separate them. He passes backward and forward from the one to the other in such a way as to show that they are only parts of one complex whole " (Lightfoot, p. 73). There is no evidence that the teacher or teachers of these errors were op- posers of Christianity. They appear to have accepted Christ and were professed Christians; but taught doctrines and practices which took away from the glory of Christ and the perfection of his work of redemption. They also appear to have been Jewish Christian teachers {-^ ■ n, le), but whether they were, before ac- cepting Christianity, Jews by birth or proselytes, may be a question. Some see in them an Ebionitish tendency, but it does not appear that they regarded Christ as merely human. Lightfoot has with great learning discussed the question whether this heretical teaching was influenced by or akin to the teaching of the Essenes. He decides that the Essenes exercised an indirect influence on the Judaistic teachers who disturbed the Colossians. In exclusiveness, asceticism, and angelology, the Colossian heresy was akin to Essenism. While the Essenes were historically confined to Palestine, their tendencies extended far outside. But such tendencies may also be traced to other sources. " Phrygia provided a congenial soil for the growth of such a type of religion. It was the home of the worship of Cybele and Sabazius and the Ephesian Artemis. . . The natural phenomena of the region about Hierapolis, Laodicea, and Colossse were well calculated to encourage a belief in demoniac or angelic powers controlling the elementary forces of nature. There was for example at Hierapolis (and still is) an opening called the Plutonium, which emitted a vapor (sulphuretted hy- drogen) fatal to animals which came within its range. . . The vapor is not always equally fatal" (T. K. Abbott, "International Crit. Com.," p. xlix.) The most that can be said of these tendencies is that they were Essenic. But they were also Gnostic. Gnosticism was an attempt to account for the existence of evil and the creation of the world. It regarded God as good, and therefore he could not have created matter, Avhich it regarded as evil. Hence it supposed be- tween God and the world various angelic emanations, the work of creation being done by the lowest of these. The practical results of this theory were extreme asceticism, or unbridled license. So we find it developed in the second century. But the first historical Gnostic was Cerinthus, who came from Egypt and was active in Asia Minor toward the close of the apostolic age. He was a converted Jew and brought into his Christian system a mixture of Gnosticism and Judaism. He may be regarded as a link between later Gnosticism and the Gnostic tendencies among the Colossians. The false teachers at Coloss;« prob- ably represented the beginnings of Judaistic Gnosticism. Without denying the ISlessiahship of Jesus, they seem to have had a doctrine of angels, who perhaps were regarded as having participated in creation. . Connected with this were asceticism and certain Judaistic principles and practices. All this these false teachers regarded as " philosophy," but Paul stamped it as " empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the rudi- ments of the world, and not according to Christ" {'i ■ a). The antidote of this false teaching he found in the nature and work of Christ, the Creator, the Up- xxx THE EPISTLE TO THE COLOSSIAXS holder of all things, the Head of the church and the Reconciler, Saviour, and Redeemer through the blood of his cross. In him the believer found the " mys- tery of God " and "all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge hidden " (2 : 2 3). Being united in him by faith, his Divine fullness eomiiletely supplied all that outward rites symbolize, and his perfect work had abrogated the restrictions of Judaism and overcome the powers of evil (2 • 10-15). Having l)een raised with him from death unto life, their life was now hid with him (» = i-»). They were therefore to set their minds on things above, not on things on the earth. TIME AND PLACE OF WRITING. In the intrc.luction to the Epistle to the Ephesians it is shown that the three Epistles, to the Ephesians, to the Colossians, and to Philemon, were sent at the same time, doubtless from Rome early in a. D. 63. This Epistle appears to have been occasioned by the information given to the apostle of the dangers to which the Colossians were exposed from heretical teachers. The opportunity was atforded by the return of Tychicus to Ephesus and Asia Minor (4:7; Kph. 6 : 21). RELATION TO OTHER EPISTLES. The relation of this Epistle to that to the Ephesians is discussed in the Intro- duction to that Epistle. Also the questions regarding the epistle from Laodicea (4 : 16, ou which see uote). The resemblance of two passages in Colossians to the epistle to the Laodiceaus in Rev. 3 : 14-21 is deserving of special notice. Thus, in the seven epistles of our Lord to the seven churches it is only in that to Laodicea that he speaks, almost in the language of Paul, thiat he is the faithful and true witness, "the beginning of the creation of God " (Rev. 3 : u). Com- pare Col. 1 : 15, "the firstborn of every creature." So also peculiar to this Laodicean epistle are the words, "I will give him to sit down with me in niy throne, as I also overcame and sat down with my Father in his throne " (Rev. 3 : 21 ) Compare Col. 3 : 1, " where Christ is sitting on the right hand of God." "This double coincidence, . . can hardly, I think, be fortuitous, and suggests an ac- quaintance with, and a recognition of, the earlier apostle's teaching on the part of St. John" (LiGHTFOOT, p. 42, note). CONTENTS OF THE EPISTLE. The apostle's purpose in writing to the Colossians was to warn and fortify them against certain false doctrines that were threatening their spiritual life and activity. Yet with admiral)le wisdom he first prepares the way for his admonition with a commendatory introduction, gliding into an exhibition of the pre-eminent nature, office, and work of Christ, and their participation in the blessing of his work of reconciliation, and his own joy and suflerings as a minister, and his eflbrts and anxiety in diffusing the gospel (1 : 1-2 : s). He then exhorts them to continue in the truth as they first received it, exposes the fiilse philosophy and false doctrines of certain heretical teachers, and warns them against their principles and practices as subversive of the simplicity of the gospel (2 : ft-23). Passing to the practical application of the foregoing, he exhorts them, that, having risoii with Clirist to a new spiritual life, they live INTRODUCTION according to this new relation (3 : i-4 : e). He then closes with personal com- mendations and greetings. The Epistles may be analyzed as follows : I. Introduction, 1 : 1-14. 1. Salutation to Colossian Christians, 1 : 1, 2. 2. Tlianksgiving for their spiritual progress, 1 : 3-8. 3. Prayer for their future spiritual advancement, 1 : 9-11. 4. With tlianksgiving for sharing in tlie saints' inheritance, 1 : 12, 13. 5. The Theme : The Son of God's love and his redemptive icork, 1 : 13, 14. 11. The Son's absolute pre-eminence in his person, office, and work, 1 : 15-29. 1. As to his person, the Creator and Upholder, 1 : 15-27. 2. As Head of the church, 1 : 18. 3. The divine fullness dwelling in him, 1 : 19. 4. His reconciling and atoning work, 1 : 20. 5. The Colossian Christians included in this reconciliation, 1 : 21-23. 6. Paul's ministry in this work among the Gentiles, 1 : 24-29. 7. His anxiety on their behalf lest they be led astray, 2 : 1-5. III. Polemical warning and arguments against errors, 2 : 6-23. 1. Charge to abide in Christ, as first received, 2 : 6, 7. 2. Warning against false teachers and their philosophy, 2 : 8. 3. This philosophy not after Christ, 2 : 8, 9. 4. Christ's divine fullness, and their fullness in him, 2 : 9, 10. 5. Their true and spiritual circumcision in Christ, 2 : 11. 6. Implied and symbolized by their baptism, 2 : 12. 7. Once dead in sin, now alive and forgiven, 2 : 13. 8. Christ has annulled the legal bond against us, 2 : 14. 9. And despoiled all opposing powers of evil, 2 : 15. 10. Therefore must not submit to these opposing observances 2 : 16 17. 11. Nor worship inferior beings, thus unfeithful to Christ, 2 : 18, 19. 12. They died with Christ to worldly ordinances, 2 : 20-23. IV. Practical application of their new risen life, 3 : 1-4 : 6. 1. Let your aims and thoughts be on things above, 3 : 1-4. 2. Put to death the sins of their unrenewed state, 3 : 5-11. 3. Put on the graces of their renewed state, 3 : 12-14. 4. Christ to rule in their hearts, words, and deeds, 3 : 15-17. 5. In practising godliness in the t\imily, 3 : 18-6 : 1. (a) By wives and husbands, 3 : 18, 19. (b) By children and parents, 3 : 20, 21. (c) By servants and masters, 3 : 22-4 : 1. 6. Persevere in prayer for themselves and for him, 4 : 2-4. 7. Wise behavior toward the unconverted, 4:5,6. y. Closing personal commendations and greetings, 4 : 7-18. 1. Refers them to Tychicus and Onesimus, 4 : 7-9. 2. Salutations from several Jewish and Gentile brethren, 4 : 10-14. 3. Salutations to the Laodiceans. A request, 4 : 15, 16. 4. A charge to Archippus, 4 : 17. 5. Salutation with his own hand, 4 : IS. THE EPISTLES TO THE THESSALONIANS Thessalonica, early known as Theruia, was situated on a hill sloping down to the water of the Thermaic (now Saloniki) Gulf, with high mountain ridges on hoth sides and a fertile country behind. It was rebuilt and enlarged in 315 B. C. by Cassander, who named it Thessalonica, after his wife, a sister of Alex- ander the Great. Her name was probably given her by her father Philip of Macedon, in commemoration of some victory over the Thessalians. Upon the Koman conquest of Macedonia, 168 B. C, Thessalonica was made the capital of the second of the four districts into which the kingdom was divided. Afterward, when the whole was consolidated into one province, it became the metropolis of the whole country. Having sided with Cassius, who defeated Brutus at Philippi, 42 B. C, it was made a free city, with the right of self-gov- ernment. Its rulers were chosen by the people and are styled by Luke (Acts 17 : 6, 8) politarchs, a strange name to scholars. But while the name politarch is unknown to classical literature, it was found on a triumphal arch which spanned the Egnatian Way at the western end of the city, and doubtless existed in Paul's day. This arch was destroyed in 1876, but fortunately a photograph of the in- scription was taken before the arch was demolished, and is more correct than most copies. The following translation is given by Prof. E. D. Burton, of Chi- cago University, in the "Biblical World" of Jub', 1896: " When Sosipater, the son of Cleopatra and Lucius Pontius Secundus ; Aulus A vius Sabiuus ; Demetrius, the son of Faustus ; Demetrius, the son of Nicopolis ; Cholos, the son of Parmenion, surnamed Meriscus, Gains Agilleius Politus were politarchs, when Taurus, surnamed Regulus, the son of Ammia, was treasurer of the city ; when Taurus, the son of Taurus, surnamed Regulus, was gym- nasiarch." It will be noticed that in this translation the names of six politarchs are given instead of seven, as in other renderings. The designation given to the magistrates of the city is a striking proof of the minute accuracy of Luke. Three of the names are the same as three of Panl's companions, Sopater and Secundus (Acts 20 : 4) and Gains (Acts 19 : 29). Thessalonica was a Greek city, and its population was largely the hardier Greeks of the north. It was of great commercial importance, next to Corinth and Ephesus. The great Roman road, the Egnatian AVay, which connected Rome with the eastern provinces, passed tlirough the city and had a most im- portant station here. The city had constant and quick communication with both the east and the west. There were thus the best facilities for "sounding forth the word of the Lord, not only in ^Macedonia and Achaia, but in every place making known their faith." Through all the changes of its history it has maintained a greater or less importance, commercially and religiously. It is one of the few cities in which Christianity has continued. In the early middle ages it was the bulwark of Oriental Christendom, " In the ninth century Cyril and Methodius carrieil the gospel from this city into central Europe, planting xxxii INTRODUCTION Christianity among the Bulgarians and ^foravians, and becoming thus indirectly the founders of the remarkable Moravian missions of modern times" (Burton). Protestant missions are carried on there to-day. The commercial character of the city has drawn to it in every age a mixed population. There were many Jews and a synagogue in the apostle's day, and ever since they have held an important place in the annals of the city. In the fifteenth century there was a great immigration of Spanish Jews, and to-day they are said to constitute over half of the population. The growth of the city has been rapid in recent years. Its population in 1896 was about one hundred and twenty thousand, made up of Spanish Jews, Turks, Greeks, Bulgarians, Italians, Germans, and English. Its name varies among these dilierent nation- alities. The Greeks still call it Thessalonica ; the Germans, Saloniki ; the Eng- lish, Salonika ; the Jews, the French, Salonique ; the Turks, Selanik ; the Ital- ians, Salonicco; the Bulgarians, Solun. THE ENTRANCE OF THE GOSPEL INTO THESSALONICA. Paul, in company with Silas and Timothy, first visited Thessalonica on his second great missionary journey, a. d. 52. Entering into the synagogue, he met Jews and devout Gentiles in various stages of proselytism, and for three Sab- baths expounded the Old Testament Scriptures, setting forth that Jesus was the Christ. Some Jews and a great multitude of Gentiles believed and many of the chief women of the city (Acts 17 : 1-4). The work went rapidly on. A church was thus gathered, mostly of Gentile converts who had originally been idolaters (1 Thess. 1 : 9). It would sccm that the time occupied by this visit to Thessalonica could not have been much more than a month. And this must not be thought too brief a period for the great work performed, for the preaching was attended with power and the Holy Spirit, and the devout and inquiring Gentiles were in a prepared state to receive the truth. The work in Thessalonica doubtless extended beyond the devout Greeks to the pagan population. The fact that many had but recently renounced idolatry accounts in part for the anxiety of the apostle to return to them. His stay had been so brief that he wished further to instruct them and direct them personally. The same fact accounts for his exhortations against returning to heathen vices and practices. THE FIRST EPISTLE. This Epistle was universally regarded as Paul's until the nineteenth cen- tury. The German Schrader first questioned its genuineness and authenticity in 1836, and the attack was repeated and further developed by Baur in 1845. Their objections were raised on internal grounds, such as a want of individuality and doctrinal statements, a supposed allusion to the destruction of Jerusalem in 2 : 16, the apocalyptic character (* : i3-i8) as not Pauline, and the reputed faith and regular church government of the Thessalonians as only suited to a later age. But these objections are not weighty and have been fully answered by recent critics. " The question is regarded as settled in fiivor of the Epistle by the later ci'itical school" (VINCENT). But Paul does give a vivid picture of himself in the first three chapters and of C THE EPISTLES TO THE THESSALONIANS the beginnings of his work among the Thessalonians. The portraiture is per- fectly natural, bearing the marks of truth and in harmony with Luke and with liimself elsewhere. The simplicity of the style of the whole Epistle, its instruct- ive and practical character, and its single doctrinal statement concerning the second coming of our Lord, accord with the young life of the Thessalonian church and with the early apostolic ministry of Paul. This, and the second Epistle as well, exhibits in a high degree the free, vivid, and personal char- acteristics of a friendly, personal letter. Paul's individuality is prominent, he is ever himself, and the picture of the church is lifelike. The errors and the opposers that called forth his later Epistles and their doctrinal discussions had not become prominent in the churches. The Jews and Gentiles were now the opposers outside of the church (2 : u), but a little later Judaism aroused opposition in the church itself. And still later the Jewish and Oriental theoso- phists and others were influencing some churches. But notwithstanding the growth in words, expressions, and doctrines exhibited in the Epistles of Paul's third missionary journey and of the captivity, there may be discovered an inimitable kinship of feeling and verbal forms in his Epistles to the Macedonian churches, his earlier to the Thessalonians, and his later to the Philippians. It seems inconceivable that either the iirst or second Epistle could be the work of a later imitator. They bear the evidences in themselves of his earlier experiences and surroundings, the teachings and encouragements needed by a young church in the midst of persecution, and the hopes, expectations, and plan of one in the younger period of his own life. OCCASION, TIME, AND PLACE. Paul had doubtless expected to remain at Thessalonica for some time, since he could support himself there by manual labor (2 Tiiess. 3 : 7, 8). But the Jewish persecution compelled him to leave quickly with the hope of returning in a short time. " Paul and Silas were sent away by night to Berea" (Acts n : 10), Avhere they labored most successfully. But the persecutors speedily followed them, and Paul was conducted alone to Athens, where he hoped Silas and Timothy might join him. But making a short stay there he appears to have left before their coming and to have gone to Corinth. Here Silas and Timothy soon after came to him from Macedonia (-^cts is : 5). Soon after Paul's departure from Thessalonica, persecution broke out against the church (1 Thcss. 2 : u). His love for this young church and his desire to instruct and encourage it made him anxious to return to it. Twice he resolved to do so, but insuperable difiiculties and malicious agencies prevented (1 Thess. 2 : 18). Being no longer able to endure his anxiety he sent Timothy in his place, in order to comfort, encourage, and strengthen the church, and bring back to him a report of its exact condition. Timothy's return and his report of the steadfast- ness of the Thessalonians in faith and love, their peculiar exposures to trials and temptations, and their need of certain instructions, are the occasion of this Epistle. The apostle at once, "just now" (» : e), prepares and sends forth his letter full of joy, afiection, encouragement, and instruction. His design was to do for them by letter what he would do orally for them if INTRODUCTiOX xxxv with them. He writes to encourage them an] id trials and persecutions, and to build them up in faith and love, to guard them against the sins of their uncon- verted state, and against misapprehensions of the duties and relations of their daily lives, and to correct false views regarding their deceased brethren at the Lord's return. It must be remembered that this is not a doctrinal nor a practical treatise, but a letter. To understand it fully we must put ourselves in Paul's place and in that of the Thessalonians. It is as many-sided as their spiritual needs; its design is as comprehensive as Paul's desire to help them. The date of this Epistle must have been in the latter half of Paul's second missionary journey, which closed at Corinth, whence he returned to Jerusalem in A. D. 54. When he wrote, Silas and Timothy were both with him (i Thess. i : i ; 2 Thess. 1:1) and the name of Silas does not appear in connection with Paul after this visit to Corinth. The following considerations fix the time more closely: (1) Paul had already left Athens (i Thess. 3 : i). (2) When Paul wrote, the Thes- salonians had " become an example to all that believe in Macedonia and Achaia," which implies some lapse of time (i Thess. i : 7, 8). (3) The growth of the church, the persecution they had endured, questions concerning those who had died, and the irregularities that had crept in, require some months at least. (4) Paul had made two unsuccessful attempts to visit Thessalonica when he sent Timothy from Athens, upon whose return the apostle wrote (i Thess. 3 : i, 2, e). (5) But the brief visit to Athens a few weeks after leaving Thessalonica (Acts n : 15) seems too early for Timothy's mission, and there is no evidence that Timothy came to Athens at that time, but rather that he came a little later to Corinth (Acts is : 5). (6) But this arrival appears not to have been a return of Timothy from a special mission to Thessalonica, but the coming of both Silas and Timothy to Corinth soon after he left Athens. Timothy, therefore, seems to have been sent alone, later than this, and to have returned alone (i Thess. 3 : 1, 2, e), before the writing of this Epistle. (7) Such considerations suggest a second visit to Athens, where he was hindered the second time from proceeding to Thessalonica, and he sends Timothy in his stead. This accords with 1 Thess. 3:1, which represents Paul as being ''left behind at Athens alone," and sending Timothy ; and also with Acts 17 : 16, which implies that Paul had then left Silas and Timothy hehind. In the one Paul seems to be going toimrd Thessalonica, in the other from that city. This view- also accords with Paul's three visits to Corinth (2 cor. 13 : 2)^ the first and third being separated by this second visit to Athens, (see note ou 3 : 1.) (8) The break in Luke's narrative at Acts 18 : 11 (see uote), when Paul had been at Corinth a year and six months, may aflford a time for Paul's second visit to Athens. After this he returns to Corinth and "remained yet many days" (Acts is : 18). This would also give time for writing the Second Epistle to the Thessalonians. (9) If then we put the planting of the church at Thessalonica in the spring of a. d. 52, we may place Paul's coming to Corinth in the summer. Reckoning time Juda- icly, "a year and six months" would designate the rest of the year till the spring of A. D. 53, and about six months, to the autumn of that year. Then making an allowance of three months for Paul's visit to Athens and his return to Corinth, and Timothy's visit to Thessalonica and return, we may fix the date of this first Epistle near the end of a. d. 53, or early in a. d. 54; and its xxxvi THE EPISTLES TO THE THESSALONIANS pliice of writing Corinth. (See discussion, "Harmony of the Acts," pp. 208- 218.) CHARACTER AND CONTENTS. This Epistle is the earliest Christian literature that has come down to us, with the exception of tlie Epistle of James and possibly the Gospel of Matthew. Paul's epistolary writings began in the providence of God, under the guidance of the Spirit, to meet a necessity. So long as his labors were confined to eastern and central Asia Minor he could visit his converts personally; but after his en- trance into Europe and the number of churches had increased in widely sepa- rated districts, he could no longer keep in personal touch and exercise apostolic watchcare, except by messenger or letter. Twice had Satan hindered him from going to Thessalonica ; but this God overruled for the good not only of Thessa- lonian believers, but also for future generations. While he wrote personally out of a heart full of love and the Holy Spirit, to meet their particular necessities, the Lord intended that his words should be for the consolation and instruction of a world-wide class of readers throughout the gospel dispensation. The character of its readers determined the character of the Epistle. They were largelj' Gentiles, having lately been converted from heathenism, and en- tered upon the Christian life. The Epistle is eminently practical and ethical throughout. It is especially adapted to young believers and for directing and molding Christian living. Though not doctrinal, we can read the underlying Christian doctrines between the lines. It brings into view the works and result of faith, but underneath is implied that the righteous shall live through believing. It speaks of deliverance from coming wrath and salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, who died for us (i : lO; 5 : lo, n), and we catch a glimpse of the sacri- ficial atonement of him "whom God set forth as a propitiation, through faith, in his blood " (Rom- 3 : 25). No great doctrinal discussions had arisen in the Thessalonian church. Its members accepted the apostle's teaching about the Messiahship of Jesus, the resurrection from the dead, and the future judgment. They looked upon him as their father in the gospel, and his example and teaching as authoritative. They were ready to imitate and obey. Their failures in religious conceptions and duty were largely from ignorance or misapprehension. Their great need was practical directions and ethical instructions. This Epistle naturally falls into two main divisions — one personal and his- torical (ciiap. 1-3), the other hortatory and consolatory (chap. 4, 5). In the fi rt!( pa rt we get a general view of an early Gentile church, and particularly the one at Thes- salonica, in the midst of trials and persecutions. "We have Paul's account of his own ministry and the entrance of the gospel into Thessalonica, and of his long- ing to see the Thessalonians and of Timothy's mission to them. In the second part we catch a view of the misconceptions and errors to which these early Christians were exposed in regard to the second coming of Christ and the state of departed brethren, with becoming consolation and admonition. We also have exhortations in regard to chastity, holiness, and brotherly love, to industry and diligence in business, to subordination in church relations, to unceasing joy and prayer, and to the Holy Spirit's presence and work. IXTRODLX^TION FURTHER ANALYSIS. First Part.— Personal and historical, 1:1-3: 13. 1. Address and salutation, 1:1. 2. Thanksgiving in behalf of the Thessalonians, 1 : 2-10. 3. Paul's ministry and conduct at Thessalonica, 2 : 1-12. 4. How the gospel was received, 2 : 13-16. 5. Paul's longing to see the Thessalonians again, 2 : 17-20. 6. Timothy's visit to the Thessalonians, 3 : 1-5. 7. His return. Paul's thanksgiving and prayer, 3 : 6-13. Part Second. — Hortatory and consolatory, 4 : 1-5 : 28. 1. Exhortations to holiness and to chastity, 4 : 1-8. 2. To brotherly love, industrious and becoming conduct, 4 : 9-12. 3. Concerning the Lord's coming and departed brethren, 4 : 13-18. 4. The Lord's coming and Christian watchfulness, 5 : 1-11. 5. Closing exhortations to practise Christian virtues, 5 : 12-22. 6. Concluding words and benediction, 5 : 23-28. THE SECOND EPISTLE. The Second Epistle to the Thessalonians has been universally regarded as genuine. But somewhat earlier, and more persistently has it been assailed than was the First Epistle, mainly on the ground of the passage in 2 : 3-12. Doubts as to the Pauline authorship were first expressed by J. E. C. Schmidt in 1804, followed by De Wette in his earlier work, whose opinion was afterward withdrawn. The attack was renewed by Kern in 1829, Avho regarded the Epistle as post-Pauline and an imitation of the First Epistle ; and this was car- ried still further by Baur, who held it to be an imitation of the Corinthian Epistles. But such attacks have been abundantly refuted by Pelt, Liinemann in Meyer's Commentary, and others. In style, character, and subjects this Epistle closely resembles the first. This is generally admitted. The arguments that establish the genuineness and authen- ticity of the First Epistle can be largely used in behalf of the Second Epistle. The two distinctive passages of the latter (2 : 1-12 ; 3 : 6-15) are evidently based on the corresponding passages of the former {* ■ n-n ; 0 : 1-10). The relation of these Epistles to the Old Testament Scriptures is significant and in point here. There is not a single quotation from the Old Testament, since it would not be required in addressing Gentile converts. But there are allusions or forms of thought and of expression in both Epistles, which show that the author's mind was imbued Avith the Old Testament writings. And such was a characteristic of Paul else- where. .See, for example, Paul's address at Athens (Acts n : 22-31). Comp. 1 : 8, "In flaming fire taking vengeance on those Avho know not God," Avith Isa. 66 : 15, "To render his anger with fury and his rebuke with flames of fire" ; 2:4, "He that opposeth himself against and exalts himself above all that is called God," with Dan. 11 : 36, "He shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods" ; also 2:8, " AVhora the Lord Jesus will slay with the breath of his mouth," with Isa. 11 : 4, "With the breath of his lips shall he slay the wicked." These and xxxviii TPIE EPISTLES TO THE THESSALONIANS other similar allusions to the Old Testament in both this and the First Epistle indicate a likeness of oliaraeter and the same writer in each. The prominence given to the one God in this Epistle harmonizes witli the fact that its readers were largely Gentiles who had turned from idols. Over fifty times the apostle uses the name God. He speaks of " a living and true God," of the "gospel of God," the " kingdom of God " and the " churches of God," and he would have them " walk worthy of God." He foretells a future judgment when "vengeance" will come upon "them that know not God." This was es^pecially fitted to arouse the Grecian mind from its levity and indifference. (Coiup. Acts 17 : SO, SI.) Especially significant is the prominence given to labor as both honorable and a duty. Labor was regarded as dishonorable by people of culture and social position. Aristotle, who had lived long in Macedonia, regarded labor as degrading to freemen. The tradesman and mechanic, though engaged in free labor, were regarded as but a little above the slave. Not only was it needful for Paul to rebuke idleness as the outgrowth of false ideas of the Lord's coming, but also as in the very air of Macedonian philosophy and customs. With special reasons, therefore, he refers to his own manual labors, and exhorts to industry on the part of the Thessalonian readers (2 Thess. 3 : 7-16). This also is worthy of note, how Paul brings into view "the kingdom of God " in both Epistles (1 Thess. 2 : 12 ; 2 xhess. 1 : 5). Especially fitting was this in Thessalonica, a Grecian city, and the capital of a great Roman province. Paul had magnified this spiritual kingdom in his preaching. And hence the charge l)rought against Paul and Silas, that they were "acting contrary to the decrees of Cicsar, saying that there was another king, Jesus" (Acts 17 : v). In striking contrast is the charge against tliem in Philippi, a Roman colony. " These men, being Jews, are greatly disturbing our city ; and proclaiming customs, which it is not lawful for us to receive, or to oliserve, being Romans" (Acts 16 : 20. 21). Notice also that "kingdom" or "kingdom of God," does not occur in the Epistle to the Philippians. It may also l)e added that the view respecting the return of the Lord points to an early date, and the early and growing experience of the apostle. Compare James, who wrote probably before the conference at Jerusalem: "Be patient therefore, brethren, until the coming of the Lord." "Establish your hearts, because the coming of the Lord draws nigh" (-lanRs 5 .- 7. 8). And as Findlay has remarked, there is no time after the year 70 when there existed an ex- pectation of the innnediate coming of Christ so intense as that indicated in 2 Thess. 2 : 2, "that the day of the Lord is present," and which needed to be checked by the apostle. The first Epistle to the Corinthians is in accord with Second Thessalonians. But between the writing of the First and Second Epistle to the Corinthians Paul suffered a severe illness, nigh unto death (2 Cor. 1 : 8 ; 5 : 8), which appears so to have affected him that ever afterward he anticipated death ratlier than the return of the Lord in his lifetime (pi'SI- 1 : 20. 21 ; .\cts 20 : 24; 2 Tim. ^ : «)• When John wrote the Revelation it seems to have been one of its designs to arouse and encourage the flagging faith in the second advent. All these facts, including delicate traits of style and expressions, point to IXTRODUCTIOX xxxix Paul as the writer of both Epistles. It seems impossible that the Second Epistle should have been an imitation of the first by any post-apostolic writer, so perfect as to escape detection during the second and succeeding centuries. TIME AND PLACE OF WRITING. The Second Epistle appears to have been written soon after the First. Com- munication between Corinth and Thessalonica was easy and rapid. Two or three months were sufficient time for the events and changes that had taken place. The course of thought in the two Epistles is closely connected. The Thessa- lonian Christians were still sutFering persecutions and their faith had grown exceedingl5^ Silas and Timothy were still with Paul (i ^ i) J and after this residence in Corinth, which terminated in the spring or summer of A. D. 54, Silas was no longer with them. The Epistle appears to have been written at Corinth, probably A. D. 54. CONTENTS AND ANALYSIS. This might almost be styled a supplement to the First Epistle. The apostle gives further instruction concerning the advent. Misapprehension and perver- sion of what Paul had taught and written regarding the doctrine alarmed some and led others to cease from their ordinary occupations. He accordingly cor- rects errors, rebukes improper practices and vagaries, speaks with greater apostolic authority, and enforces the duty of church discipline. After his usual greetings, thanksgiving, and prayer, he proceeds to the main object of the letter, to show that the advent is not immediate, that it must be preceded by the apostasy, and the revelation of the Man of Sin. This is the great peculiarity of this Epistle. It is the only apocalyptic discourse of the Apostle Paul. It has its roots in the prophecy of Daniel and in the last discourse of Jesus on the Mount of Olives. It corresponds to some things in the Apocalypse of John, but probably is not otherwise related to it except as they may both be related to the words of Daniel and Jesus. The Epistle naturally falls into three divisions, Introductory, Doctrinal, and Practical, each division closing with a prayer, and the whole with Paul's autograph salutation and benediction. It may be ana- lyzed as follows : I. Introductory Section, chap. 1. 1. Greeting, 1 : 1, 2. 2. Thanksgiving and encouragement, 1 : 3-10. 3. Prayer, 1 : 11, 12. II. Doctrinal Section, chap. 2. 1. Error regarding our Lord's coming, 2:1,2. 2.. The apostasy and the Man of Sin must come first, 2 : 3-12. 3. Thanksgiving, exhortation, and prayer, 2 : 13-17. [II. Practical and Concluding Section, chap. 3. 1. Paul asks prayers for himself and helpers, 3 : 1, 2. 2. His confidence respecting his Thessalonian converts, 3 : 3-5. 3. A charge concerning discipline, 3 : 6-15. 4. Concluding prayer, 3 : 16. 5. Salutation and benediction, 3 ; 17, 18, THE PASTORAL EPISTLES The two Epistles to Timothy and the one to Titus are called Pastoral Epistles, because addressed to men in charge of churches and occupied largely with in- structions to those tilling the pastoral office. Paul has been universally regarded as their author, except by some Gnostics, through all the Christian ages down to the nineteenth century. They were used as genuine letters by the earliest Christian writers after apostolic days, Barnabas, Clement Romanus, Ignatius, and Polycarp. They were so regarded by the Greek apologists, Justin Martyr and Theophilus of Autioch; and by the Christian Fathers down to Eusebius. They are found in the earliest versions, the Peshito-Syriac, and the Old Latin, and are included in the canon of the Muratorian Fragment. The Gnostic here- tics used them as authentic documents, but some, including Marcion, denied their Pauline authorship. This they did because they thought these Epistles condemnatory of their own peculiar doctrines. Their treatment is really a testi- mony in their favor. The fact that some questioned their genuineness shows that the early churches did not accept these Epistles without consideration. But during the nineteenth century objections have been made to the gen- uineness of these Epistles on internal grounds. First, in 1807, Schleiermacher attacked the genuineness of First Timothy, and was followed by Eichhorn, and by others, who attacked all three Epistles. Later Baur and the Tubingen school rejected all three as spurious. The principal objections urged against their genuineness are: 1, That these Epistles, in their historical allusions, are not in harmony with Luke's account of Paul's life, as recorded in the Acts of the Apostles. But this is on the supposition that Paul was imprisoned only once, and that he was put to death at the end of the period covered by the Acts. But it is a fair implica- tion from the abrupt termination of Acts 28 : 31 that Paul was released at the end of his fii-st imprisonment of two years. This is confirmed by the universal testimony of early Christian writers and tradition. These Epistles too, until they are proved forgeries, are witnesses to facts in the apostle's history; and these facts point decidedly to missionary journeys after the apostle's release and to a second imprisonment. Besides, the historical difficulties are themselves marks of genuineness. A forger who could deceive biblical writers for 1800 years would have fitted his allusions to, and not contrary to, the Acts. (For fuller discussion see Acts 28 : 31, note ; and " Harmonyof the Acts," § 60.) 2. That the style is not Pauline and indicates a later period. But variations of style and diction appear in Paul's earlier Epistles. New words and expres- sions occur in them all. The difterences and peculiarities in the f^pistles to the Thessalonians and tliose to the Galatians and Romans are very marked. The same is true of Ephesians, Colossians, and Philippians in comparison with Gala- tians and Romans. The reason for this is found in the difierent conditions of the churches he addressed, the different errors and opposers he was meeting, as well as changes in himself and in his vocabulary. The ditierences and pecu- liarities in these latest P^pistles to Timotliy and Titus are not greater than might xl INTRODUCTION xli be expected. They are familiar letters to friends, beloved as spiritual children, and bear the marks of epistolary correspondence. Paul is an old man, having lost much of the fervor and impetuosity of his more active life. AVe would look for greater simplicity of style. New experiences, new conditions, new subject^^•, would naturally call for many words and expressions not found in his other Epistles. Many of these are noticed in the commentary. Yet, notwithstanding this, we are constantly reminded of Paul in reading these Epistles. We feel the warmth of his heart and the impress of his thoughts. Many of his peculiar ex- pressions and fifty-three words which are peculiar to his other Epistles are found in these. 3. That the church organization is too advanced for this early period. But is this a fact? Timothy and Titus surely do not represent a third order in the Christian ministry. There is no evidence that they were in any sense diocesan bishops. They were rather missionai'ies or evangelists, looking after missions and churches, and advising and co-operating with pastors and churches. Many of our Baptist missionaries do a similar work on our foreign fields. The churches, however, do appear to have become more fixed and complete in their organiza- tion, with two classes of officers, pastors and deacons. The transient features were passing away ; the essential features remained. Yet no advance seems to have been made in ecclesiasticism since Paul's letter to the Philippians, a few years before. The terms elder and bishop are used as designating the same office (Titus 1 : 5, 7), just as years before at Ephesus and Philippi (Acts 20 : n, 28 ; piiii. 1 : i). But the time had come when the qualifications required for entering these offices should be defined, and instructions given to those holding these official positions. They are therefore necessarily brought into greater prominence, while the sim- plicity of the organization remains the same. 4. That the instructions regarding widows point to a later date. But this is on the supposition that the term "widows" in 1 Tim. 5 : 3-16 designates an order of consecrated virgins in the church. But such a supposition rests on a false interpretation of the passage, as the commentary shows. The widows were evidently those who were bereaved and were alone in the world and are at such an age as to need the financial aid of the church. 5. That the heresies referred to in these Epistles point to the Gnosticism of the second century. But Paul had as early as a. d. 58 foretold that, after his departure from Ephesus, grievous woes would come and men would arise speaking perverse things (Acts 20 : 29, so). The germ of Gnosticism existed early in the churches of Asia Minor. Essene Judaism was Gnostic in germ and tendency, and seems to be the heresy of the Colossian Epistle in its early stage, and, with a little advance, of the pastoral Epistles. Hence the expressions, "endless genealogies" (i Tim. 1 : 4), "forbidding to marry, commanding to abstain from foods" (1 Tim. 4 : 3), "opposition to that which is fiilsely called knowledge" (1 Tim. 6:20)^ "saying that the resurrection has already taken place " (2 Tim. 2 : 18), mark the tendencies of Gnosticism in Paul's later years, and are forerunners of the Gnostics of the second century. Such is the opinion of a majority of expositors. In conclusion, the effi)rt to prove the spuriousness of these Epistles entirely xlii THE TASTORAL EPISTLES fails. Certain peculiarities have been emphasized and made prominent, all of which can be reasonably explained. But the Pauline spirit, type of thought, general diction and doctrine, have been minimized or overlooked. As a matter of fact, some of the most characteristic Pauline passages occur in these Epistles. The expressions, lines of thought, and contents are determined largely by the ol)stacles in the way of the gospel and the circumstances in which he and his readers were placed. But while new words and new expressions appear, no new doctrine is set forth. The great doctrine that righteousness comes not by works lint by faith is insisted on (Titus 3 : 5). The only ground of salvation is the grace of God in Christ, who was manifest in the flesh (1 Tim. 3 : le) and gave himself a ransom (1 Tim. 2 : g; Titus 2: u). Nowhcrc in Paul's writings can we find better summaries of his faith than those found in these Epistles, such as 1 Tim. 3 : 16; 2 Tim. 1 : 9, 10; Titus 2 : 11-14; 3 : 4-7. The genuineness of these Epistles has been maintained by Iluther in "Meyer's Commentary," Farrar, Salmon (1892), AVeiss (18S6), Gloag, Wace in "Speaker's Commentary," Plummer in "Expositor's Bible," Alford, and many others. SUPPLEMENTAL. The Pastoral Epistles have been styled Paul's last will and testament, in which he gives his final instructions in regard to the doctrines, practices, officers, and government of the chm'ches. He inculcates no new doctrines, but enforces those which had already been delivered and the importance of holding on to sound and wholesome teaching. Among topics for special study the following are suggested : A comparison of these Epistles, (1) with that to Philemon, the only other letter to an individ- ual that has comedown to us; (2) with that to the Philippians as to church officers and Christian living; (3) with those to the Galatians and to the Ephe- sians as to the church ; (4) with those to the Corinthians as to church order and life ; (5) with those to the Romans and to the Galatians as to Christian doctrine ; («)) with that to the Colossians as to the heresies which threatened the integrity of the gospel; and (7) with those to the Thessalonians as to defections in the church in after days. A similar comparison coidd be made with the Epistles of James, Peter, Jude, and John — all indicating a unity in diversity, and a pro- gress in doctrine and practice under the guidance of the one superintendent Spirit (John 16 : 13 ; 1 Cor. 12 : 11). TIMOTHY Timothy was a native, possibly, of Derbe (Acts 20 : i)^ but more probably of Lystra (Acts le : 2), Avhere he Avas piously trained from early childhood in the knowledge of the Old Testament Scriptures by his grandmother, Lois, and his mother, Eunice. It must have been on Paul's first missionary journey that Timothy, a boy of about fifteen years, was converted under his ministry and became thus his child in the faith. Four or five years later, on his second mis- sionary tour, the apostle finds Timothy at Lystra (A. D. 51), active, devoted in Christian work, well- reported, and singled out by the prophets of the church for the work of an evangelist (2 Tim. 2:2; 4:5). Approved by the church (Acts 16 : 2), Timothy was set apart to the work, not only by the laying on of hands of the apostle, but also of the eldership (1 Tim. i -.u. 2 Tim. 1 : e). His mother being a Jew, but his father a Greek, he had not been circumcised when a child. Paul circumcised him in order that he might be a more acceptable worker among the Jewish people. This he did, not as a matter of compulsion or conscience, but of liberty, and of becoming all things to all men that he might gain some. Timothy accompanied Panl in his missionary journey through the cities of those parts and through the region of Phrygia and Galatia. Thence they go to Troas and to Europe, laboring at Philippi, Thessalonica, and Berea. Here Timothy and Silas are left behind to consolidate the work in that part of Macedonia, while Paul went to Athens. They soon after followed him to Corinth (Acts is : 5). Here their names were associated with Paul's in the two Epistles to the Thessalonians, about A. D. 53. For three or four years we lose sight of Timothy, though it seems natural to think of him as all this time a helper of Paul. Early in the year, a. d. 57, lie was with the apostle at Ephesus, and was sent on a delicate mission to Corinth, a little before the I'irst Epistle to the Corinthians was written. Later in the year Paul met Timothy in ]\Iacedo- nia, and associated his name with his own in writing his Second Epistle to the Corinthians. In the winter of A. D. 58 they were at Corinth, and when the Epistle to the Romans was written, Timothy sent salutations to friends in Rome. Tliey were together at the Passover at Philippi, March 27, A. d. 58, on their way to Jerusalem. How far Timothy traveled with Paul, or how long he continued with him, we do not know. For about four years we again lose sight of him, till we find him with the apostle during his first imprisonment at Rome. Here their names ai-e united in sending Epistles to the Philippians, the Colossians, and to Philemon, about A. D. 62 or 63. AVhat additionally we know of Timothy must be gathered mostly from the two Epistles addressed to him. "When Paul was liberated in the spring of a. d. 63, we may infer that Timothy accompanied him into jSIacedonia and Asia Elinor (Phil. 2 : 23-26; Phiiem. 22). If Paul uiadc his long-intended visit to Spain, it may have been undertaken in a. d. 64. Returning in a. d, 65, he might have avoided Rome on account of the pei-secution of Christians, where possibly Timothy had recently sufiered a short imprisonment (ueb. n -. 23). The two are again at Ephesus (1 Tim. i : 3). Timothy is left, with tears (1 Tim. 1 : 4) to look xliii xliv TIMOTHY after the interests of the church there, and Paul went into Macedonia, where he wrote his First Epistle to Timothy. After this he visited Crete, in company with Titus, whom he left on that island. In the spring of A. D. 60 he may have left Crete and visited Ephesus again (-J Tim. i : is), where Alexander the copper- smith, then or later, did him nuicii harm (2 Tim. i : 14). Tlien, passing through Miletus, he left Trophinuis there sick (2 Tim. 4 : 20) ; stopping at Troas, he left his cloak with Carpus (-' Tim. 4 : n) ; and going on to Corinth, P'rastus remained there (2 Tim. 4 : 20). At one of these jdaces Paul piobal)ly wrote his Epistle to Titus. From Corinth, Paul proceeded to Nicopolis, where he had determined to pass the winter of A. D. 67 (Titus 3 : 12)^ but he was arrested and sent to Rome a second tin)e for trial. Here he wrote his Second Epistle to Timothy, wishing him to come at once to Rome and giving him his farewell counsels. Whether Timothy was able to comply with his wish we know not. Tiiis ends all that we really know of Timotliy. Tradition, which is colored by hierarchical bias, relates that he was the first bishop of Ephesus. But of this there is no evidence in authentic history, and it is in conflict with the purport of the Pastoral Epistles. Everywhere in these and in the other Epistles he appears as Paul's assistant, a missionary and an evangelist, working under the apostle's direction. The Scriptures present Timothy as beautiful in character and life. From the beginning of his ministry, A. D. 51 to the end of Paul's life, A. D. GT, he was the loving friend and the devoted helper of the apostle. In tender atl'ection Paul styles him "my true child in the faith" and "a beloved child." In reciprocating love Timothy served with the apostle for the gospel, "as a child serves a father." Among all his converts and helpers, Paid found no one so like-minded. In the infirmities of old age, exhausting lal)ors, and terrible persecutions, he could minister to the physical weakness of his still youthful assistant, thirty years younger than himself, who in turn gave to the apostle the devotion and hearty companionship of a younger life. The one bold, coura- geous, impulsive, and enthusiastic ; the other naturally timid, reflective, reserved, and circumspect, the two were complements of each other, ever faith- ful to each other, and both equally loyal to Christ their Master. THE FIRST EPISTLE TO TIMOTHY. From this Epistle it appears that Paul, on his way to ^Nfacedonia, left Tim- othy at P^phesus to counteract certain errors of false teachers and to fortify the church in healthful doctrine (1 Tim. 1 : 3, 4 ,- .^ : u ; 4 : 1:1), practice, and life. From Macedonia the apostle, late in A. d. Go, indited this letter to Timothy to instruct and encourage him in the very difficult mission assigned him. Youthful and naturally timid, and long accustomed as an assistant to lean on Paul, when left alone in work he seems to lack somewhat of firmness, positiveness, and courage. And Paul, an old man, feels a fatherly anxiety for the highest success of one so much younger than himself, whom he had loved from a child. AVith apostolic authority he gives him a most solemn charge in regard to doctrine, worship, church officials, personal duties, and godliness. This Epistle bears the marks of a familiar, personal letter of an aged teacher to a favorite disciple. It seems also to have been intended in some measure for INTRODUCTION xlv tlie churches where Timothy ministered, and as a credential for Timothy's au- thority in his conflict with error and false teachers, and in organizing, officering, and building up churches. It has not the systematic form of some of Paul's longer p]pistles, but its topics fall in naturally, as might be expected in epistolary cor- respondence. Its analysis may be outlined as follows : 1. Address and salutation, 1:1,2. 2. Timothy's work at Ephesus, 1 : 3, 4. 3. Character of the erring teachers, 1 : 5-7. 4. The true functions and uses of the law, 1 : 8-11. 5. Thanks to Christ for his own conversion and ministry, 1 : 12-17. 6. Charges Timothy to faithfulness in the ministry, 1 : 18-20. 7. As to public prayer for all men, 2 : 1, 2. 8. Grounded on the provision of mercy for all, 2 : 3-7. 9. Duties and position of men and women in public worship, 2 : 8-15. 10. Qualifications required in a bishop or pastor, 3 : 1-7. 11. Those required in a deacon and deaconess, 3 : 8-13. 12. Enforced by the dignity and glory of the church, 3 : 14-16. 13. False teachers and false doctrines are to come, 4 : 1-5. 14. Avoid useless discussions ; strive after godliness, 4 : 6-10. 15. Exhorts to ministerial faithfulness and diligence, 4 : 11-16. 16. How admonition is to be given, 5 : 1, 2. 17. Directions in regard to widows, 5 : 3-16. 18. In regard to the treatment of elders, 5 : 17-20. 19. Summing up his warnings and exhortations, 5 : 21-25. 20. Obedience enjoined upon Christian servants, 6:1,2. 21. Warning against false teachers and against covetousness, 6 : 3-10. 22. A solemn personal exhortation to continue steadfast, 6 : 11-16. 23. A charge to be given to the rich, 6 : 17-19. 24. Concluding words to Timothy, 6 : 20, 21. SECOND EPISTLE TO TIMOTHY. In the Second Epistle to Timothy we have the latest words of Paul that have come down to us. It was written in his prison after his preliminary trial at the imperial court, and before his second trial, which resulted in his condemnation and martyrdom. And this result he was expecting. " For as to me, I am al- ready being offered, and the time of my departure is at hand " {'^ Tim. 4 : 6). He is severely treated and closely guarded. Onesiphorus had come to Eome and had found him only by diligent seeking (2 Tim. i : le-is). At his first defense all forsook him (2 Tim. 4 : 16). And now, while expecting his second and final trial, Luke, the beloved physician, alone is with him (2 Tim. 4 : 11). Evidently this was not Paul's first imprisonment at Eome, when he was permitted to occupy his own hired lodging-s, and allowed the liberty of receiving friends and wel- coming all who wished to come to him, and preaching and teaching with all boldness (Acts 28 : 30, 31). It niust have been later than the great fire at Rome, which broke out July 19, A. D. 64, and the persecutions of Christians that fol- lowed. Christians were now distinguished from the Jews, and could no longer xlvi TIMOTHY enjoy the toleration extended to the Jewish religion. They had thus beeouie more obnoxious than formerly to the Roman autliorities. As above noted, Paul probably left Corinth at the end of the autumn of a. d. 66, to pass the winter at Nicopolis. Soon after arriving tliere he was arrested as a leader of the proscribed sect, perhaps at the instigation of Jewish enemies, or through plots against liis life conceived at Corinth. He was, doubtless, sent as soon as jjossible to Rome as a noted criminal and to gratify Nero. The navigation of the Mediterranean was indeed closed for the winter, especially for long voyages. But short passages, such as from Apollonia in Illyricum to Brun- dusiuni in Italy were undertaken. We nuiy therefore believe that early in a. D. 67 Paul arrived a prisoner at Rome. With no long delay he had his first hear- ing l)efore the court, not of the emperor personally, but of that delegated by him under the city priefect. Paul was so far successful as to escape condemnation on the first charge against him, perhaps as an incendiary, and he was remanded to prison to answer in due time to a second charge. What this second charge was is not known. Some Christians, however, were charged with conspiracy against the government, because they would not worship tlie emperor or the local deities, and it is not improbable that this was the final charge against Paul, from which he did not exi^ect an acquittal. Under these circumstances he indites his Second Epistle to Timothy and sends it in the early spring of A. D. 67. As to 2)f unto the churches 3 of Galatia : « Grace be to you and peace from God the Father, and from our 4 Lord Jesus Christ, 'who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us ''from this present evil world, laccord- 2 him from the dead, and all the breth- ren who are with me, to the churches 3 of Galatia : Grace to you, and peace, from God the Father, and our Lord 4 Jesus Christ ; who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us out of the present evil age, according to the d 1 Cor. 16 : 1. e See refs. 2 Cor. 1:2; Eph. 1:2; 2 Johu 3. * 6 : U ; Johu 17 : 14, 15 ; 1 Johu 5:4,5, 19. i 2 : 20 ; see refs. Matt. 20 : 28. I Hub. 10 : 9, 10. (l Cor. 1:1:2 Cor. 1:1; Eph. 1:1; Col. 1:1), " Instruction is generally given by one individual, as by Gamaliel ; calling by more than one ; hence the ditlerence of number, from men, througli a man" (Bengel). Notice that Jesus Christ, in connection with God the Father, is put in opposi- tion to every liuman source and means, implying the divinity of Christ. Notice also that Paul asserts that he received his commission directly through Christ, as Mediator appointed by the Father, who raised him from the dead, the crowning miracle and proof of his ^lessiahship. It was the risen and liv- ing Christ who called him, and whose apostle he was. This naturally sug- gests that his call went back to the gate of Damascus to the risen Christ, whom he then heard and saw (Acts 9 : 3 ff. ; 26 : 16-lS). 2. In addressing the Galatians, Paul unites all the brethren which are with me, especially connected and associated with him, his traveling com- panions and assistants. Comp. Pliil. 4 : 21, where "brethren M'ith me" re- fers to the narrower circle of Christians about him, such as fellow-preacher and helpers, and "saints" to the other brethren of the church. Who these were we do not know, but doubtless such as were known to the Galatians, (Rom. 16 : 21-2;{ ; 1 Cor. 16 : 19. 20; Acts 19 : 22.) This mention of them implies that they were one with him in the go.spel he preached, and at the same time it was an act of courtesy to both them and to the Galatians, Unto the churches of (rialatia, located somewhere in the province of that name ; perhaps in the three principal cities, Ancyra, Pessinus, and Tavium, But nothing is positively known. (On Galatia, and the Soutli Galatian theory, see Intro- duction. ) Probably this was a circular letter to be read in the several churches of that region. Not unlikely several copies were prepared for the churches. 3. Though Paul omits his usual words of commendation, he does not forget what was more important, his benedic- tion. Grace, God's unmerited favor, be to you and peace, the joy and rest of soul resulting from God's favor. These come from God the Father of believers, including both those send- ing the letter and also tho.se to whom it was sent; and from our Lord, our Divine Master, Jesus Christ. Notice that the preposition froin governs both the Father and our Lord. Both are the source of grace and peace, which accords with the view that they both belong to and are persons of the one God. ( Comp. note ou Rom. 1:7.) ■ 4. The sentence of the preceding verse continued in this and the next verse. Who gave himself to death as a sacrifice for our sins, a marvel- ous exhibition of grace. The preposi- tion for is used here of the design or purpose of the taking away of our sins and guilt. He gave himself on ac- count of or in behalf of our sins in order to expiate or atone for them and deliver us from their power. Compare similar scriptural language containing the idea of atonement made for our sins by Christ's sacrifice of himself (.Matt. 20 : 28 ; Mark 10 : 45 ; Johu 6 : 51 ; 1 Tim. 2:6; Titus 2 : 14 ; Heb. 7 : 27 : 9 : 25-28 ; 10 : 10, 12, 14; 1 Peter 2 : 24). Paul makcs promi- nent salvation through the atoning sac- rifice of Christ in opposition to the Judaizingdoctrine of salvation through circumcision and legal observances. Thus he brings to the front at once the grand theme of the Epistle. The de- sign of this sacrificial work was that he might deliver us from, out of, this present evil world, or age, not merely the age in which they then lived, which was terribly wicked, but rather the world-age or period, which Ch. I.] GALATIANS 57 iug to the will of God and our Father : 5 to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen. Reproof of the Galatians for inconstancy. 6 I marvel that ye are ™so soon re- moved °from him that called you into ° the grace of Christ unto another gos- 7 pel : which is not another ; but there be some p that trouble you, and would per- 5 will of our God and Father ; to whom be the glory forever and ever. Amen. 6 I wonder that ye are so quickly re- moving from hira who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gos- 7 pel ; which is not another, only there are some who trouble you, and wish to m 3 : 1-4 ; 4 : 9-11 ; 5 : 4, 7, 8. ij5 : 10, 12; n 1 Cor. 3:5; 4 : : Acts 15 : 1-5, 24 ; Rom. 16 : 0 Rom. 5 : 2. would end with the second coming of Christ, an age to be marked with great wickedness (2 'n.ess. 2 : 3 it. ; 1 johu 5 : 19). The world, or age, to come follows Christ's second coming. This deliver- ance out of this present evil world in- cludes deliverances from its evil asso- ciations and influences and from the power and penalty of sin. All this, — Christ giving himself for the salvation of men, — was according to the will, the supreme, sovereign will, of God and our Father, or better, of our God and Father, independent of and beyond all human merit or attainment. In the use of the word our Paul refers to believers. Christians are the sons of God (Ro"i- 8 : i+). They can truly say " our God," whose they are and whom they serve (Acts 27 : 23), and also "our Father," having a spiritual re- lationship to him through Jesus Christ (Rom. 8 : 15). 5. Having traced back the salvation of men through the sacrificial work of Christ to the will of God the Father, the apostle breaks forth in an ascrip- tion of praise. To whom be the glory of this gracious work of redemption for ever and ever, unto the ages of ages, the countless ages of eternity. Amen, a solemn confirmation of the truth of what he had said, So it is and so let it be. 6-10. The reproof. The occa- sion OF THE Epistle. Paul expresses surprise.at the fickleness of the Galatian Christians; refers to their false teach- ers ; severely denounces their false doc- trines ; affirms the strict truthfulness of the gospel he preaches; and de- clares his own faithfulness as Christ's servant. 6. Instead of thanksgiving and com- mendation, which usually follow his salutation (l Thess. l : 2 ; 2 Thess, I : 3, etc.). Paul utters surprise, rebuke, and de- nunciation, yet at the same time min- gled with tenderness. His words are like a thunderbolt in a clear sky. I marvel, I am painfully surprised, that ye are so soon removed, so quickly ronoving (the process still going on), from him that called you, God the Father through the Holy Spirit and the word of truth (ki>ii- 3 : 5, 6), into, rather, in, the grace of Christ, in and through his unmerited favor as the ground and source of your calling, unto another sort of, or different, gospel, which is not of grace. The words so quickly most naturally refer to the short time since they were called and converted. They imply a quick- ness in yielding in some measure to Judaizing teachers and a fickleness characteristic of their Gallic race. Paul's surprise implies also that this falling away must have occurred since his last or second visit, which therefore must have been recent. Such consid- erations point to an early date of the Epistle. Forgiveness of sins and salva- tion through the meritorious works of the law in addition to faith in Christ was indeed to Paul a different gospel from that he had received and preached. 7. Paul modifies and explains more accurately what he had just said. Which is emphatically not another, of the same kind as mine; but there be some, etc., rather, but only so far as there are some who trouble you, and ?mA to pervert the gospel of Christ. The "another" of the last verse and the " another " of this are ren- derings of diiferent words in the orig- inal. The former expresses a different, a second gospel ; the latter, a like gospel, with perhaps something added. The meaning is, it is not another real, true gospel, for there can be no other, and it 58 GALATIANS [Ch. I. 8 vert the gospel of Christ. But though 1 we, or au angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we liave preached unto you, let 9 him be accursed. As we said before, so say 1 now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you 'than that ye have received, let him be accursed. 10 For "do I now per.suade men, or God ? Or do 1 seek to please men ? For if I yet 8 pervert thegosi)el of Christ. But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach a gospel to you other than that which we preached to you, let him 9 be accursed. As we have said be- fore, so I now say again, if any one preaches a gospel" to you contrary to that which ye received, let him be ac- 10 cursed. For am I now seeking the fa- vor of men, or of God ? Or am 1 seek- ing to please men? If I were still g 1 Cor. 16 : 2a. r Deut. 4 : 2. « Acts 4 : 19 ; 5 : 29 ; 1 Thess. 2:4; James 4 : 4. can be called a gospel only in the sense that they attempt to pervert the true gospel teaching concerning Christ. This has reference to the Judaizing teachers and their doctrines. The word trans- lated trouble means here to perjjfex or ttusett/e their minds by suggesting scru- ples and doubts ( Acts is : 24). They would tlius shake tlieir allegiance tO Christ and the gospel truths concerning him. 8, Such false teachers are severely denounced. You have indeed heard these perverted doctrines from teachers who claim authority and knowledge. But even thou§:h Ave, I Paul, and such of my associates as Timothy, Titus, and Silas, or an angel from heaven, a being more exalted than any of the human race, s/iouhl preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached, or contrary to, at variance with fluit gospel irliich ice preac/ied unto you, let him be ac- cursed, anathema, subject to the wrath and curse of (iod. (See Rom. 9 : :<: 1 Cor. IB: 22.) How strongly Paul puts the case by the use of a supposition which could really never ])ecoine a fact. The expression, any other gospel than that, may be rendered either besides that, that is, additional to, supplemen- tary to, or contrary to, against that we preached. The first answers to another gospel of ver. 7, the second to a different gospel of ver, (>. But both were op- posed to the gospel Paul preached. The stronger rendering, contrai'y to, is most in harmony with the vehement expression of the apostle, but it included by implication all human additions. The true gospel is exclusive of the false ; the besides is reallj' against. In the ex- pression,/>(7 hihi beanathnna, orcarsed, there is no reference to its later ajiplica- tion to ecclesiastical excommunication, a meaning not found in the New Testa- ment, for an angel is here included. It here means an accursed imrson or thing, separated from the favor and subject to the wrath of the Almighty. It were ])etter that the one be cursed than that niany be lost through his influence. Paul's earnest words sliow his absolute confidence in tlie gospel he preached. He knew the truth of what he aflirmed. 9. Paul repeats the thought of the preceding verse by a supposition which might and did occur. From the hy- pothetical he comes to the actual. As j we have said before, not referring to the preceding verse, but to what he and his colleagues had said on his second visit to them, so say I now again, at tl-.is present time I repeat, If any ! man preach, ratlier, Jf any one is ! preaching a gospel to you contrary to ! that ye received at your conversion, let j him be accursed. Notice that in the i preceding verse it was the gospel Avhieh I Paul preached ; in tliis the gospel they ! had received. Paul had met Avith Ju- daizing teachers at Antioch and else- where ; and at his late visit to the Gala- tians he had feared or foreseen their coming among them, or detected the beginnings of their erroneous doctrines. And so by anticipation he warned them. Forewarned, he tliought they would be forearmed. (Comp. .Acts 20 : 29, '30.) 10. For connects with what pre- cedes and introduces an explanatory reason for his strong and vehement lan- guage. Pe not surprised at my severe wonls, nor shocked at my terrible de- nunciation of false teachers. For do I now, at tliis time, in this condition of things, persuade, rather, seek to inn the favor of, men, or Cilod? The question implies that he was seeking the favor of God rather than that of men. (Comp. Acts 4 : 10; 5 : 29.) Or dO I seek to please men? implying that Ch. I.] GALATIAXS 59 pleased men, I should not be the serv- ant of Christ. Vindication of FauVs apostolic authority. 11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not pleasing men, I should not be Christ's servant. For I make known to you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by he was not seeking to please them, j Omit for, according to the best text, j If I yet pleased men. If I were . still, any longer pleasing men, as men act before conversion to God, after all my experiences, I should not now be the servant of Christ, more ex- actly, without the article. I should not • be Christ's servant, his bond-servant, ] his slave, as one who not only owed all | his service to Christ, but was also owned by Christ. Men-pleasing is in strong contrast to servant {co\. 3 : 22). He could not serve two masters (Matt. 6 : 24). Some suppose that the apostle refers to his seeking to please men before his con- version ; but such a supposition is not j necessary. The language implies that j he may often have striven to win and conciliate men since his conversion (coiup. 1 Cor. 9 : 20), but uow uudcr prcscut circumstances he could no longer do it. | The question was between Christ's gos- pel and a different gospel ; between true, Christ-commissioned teachers, and false Judaizing teachers. Not to take a de- cided stand would be false to Christ. The character of these teachers may be learned from 2:4; 4 : 17; 6 : 12, 13. Perhaps too, some may have accused him of being a man-pleaser in fevoring cir- cumcision under certain circumstances (5 : 11), as in the circumcision of Timo- thy (Acts 16: 3); but now Conciliation was no longer allowable. By the ex- pression, Christ's servant, his moral re- lation to Christ is meant, extending to his whole being, life, and work, as a Christian, a preacher, and au apostle. The mention of himself as Christ's servant is suggestive of his conversion, calling, apostolic mission, and work. The chapter thus far is but preparatory to the personal vindication, the doctri- nal discussion, .ind the practical lessons of the entire Epistle that follow. 11-24; 2 : 1-21. Paul vindi- cates HIS APOSTOLIC PREACHING AND AUTHORITY. In doing this lie refutes the misrepresentations of his Judaizing opponents, and brings prominently into view the nature and terms of the gospel he preached, and prepares the way for the doctrinal discussion which forms the body of the Epistle. This section falls into three parts: (1) His apostle- ship divinely given and his gospel divinely received (ver. ie-24) ; (2) his apostolic authority and gospel preach- ing recognized by the other apostles (2 : 1-10) ; (3) his independent apostolic authority exercised and proved in his rebuke of Peter (2 : 11-21). 11-24. Pall's apostolic preach- ing AND commission, INDEPENDENT OF MEN, DIVINELY GIVEN. This is shown by the manner of his conversion and the history of the first fourteen years or more of his Christian life. His apostleship began at his conver- sion, which he immediately exercised without human instruction and inde- pendently of the apostles (ver. 11-17). Af- ter three years he went t(i Jerusalem on a brief, friendly visit, V)iit saw none of the apostles, except Peter, and James, the Lord's brother (ver. is-20) ; and then went into Syria and Cilicia, and was known to the churches of Judea only by reputation. 11. But, better. For, according to the most approved text, thus connecting this verse witli what precedes and giv- ing a reason for uttering the truth with- out fear or favor, l)ecause the gospel he preached was a revelation from God. 1 This verse also is introductory to the defensive portion of the Epistle. For I certify, make known, to you, a for- mal and .solemn declaration (comp. 1 Cor. 15: 1 • 2 Cor. 8:1), brethren (recognizing their spiritual relationship, he would reason with them and win them), that the gospel which was preached by me is not after man, either in its origin or character. It is not of man's devising nor according to human standards or notions. Notice Paul begins with the defense of his gospel rather than of himself. It was dearer to him than his life. Yet his gospel and his apostleship must stand or fall together. Both were assailed, but the former through the latter. So he must 60 UALATIANS [Ch. I. 12 after man : for 'I neither received it of man, neitlier was I tau^'ht //, but by 13 the rcvehition of Jesus I'luist. For ye liave heard of my conversation in time l)ast in the Jew's' reliKion ; how tiiat "beyond measure I persecuted the 14 church of God, and wasted it: and ]irolited in tiie Jews' religion above many my cut this was not his ease. In contrast to all human instru- mentality he received it by, or rather through, the revelation of Jesns Christ. Was the revelation from Christ, or concerning Christ, Christ re- vealed to him? It was from the di- vine Christ in opposition to all human agency. Yet at the same time Christ was made known to him (ver. i6). Both began at his conversion (Acts 26 : u, 15). Christ was then both the Revealer and the Revealed. But was this revelation confined to the time of his conversion? Probably not. He had many revela- tions on other occasions (-' <'"r. 12 : 1, 7; Acts 22 : 17-21). Very likely he enjoyed such revelations of gospel truth during his first three years, while at Damascus and in Arabia (ver. 17). The funda- mental truths of his gospel, ])resenting a gracious salvation through faith in Christ, oftered freely to Gentiles as well as to Jews, appear to have been re- vealed to him from the very first (Acts 26: 16-19). Tliere were also revelations; of Jesus Christ through the Spirit (1 t'-r. 2 : 10, 12; Kph. .T : H), Receiving his gos- ; pel directly from Jesus Christ was a qualification and an evidence of his j apostleship. In this verse and the last I we have the theme of the first portion of the Epistle. 13. It was evident from his manner of life before his conversion that he did not receive the gospel through human infiuenee or in.struction (this verse and the next). His former life was a his- torical argiiinent and proof. For ye have heard, rather, j/e heard from me when i was with you (and probably from his helpers) of my conversa- tion, that is, of my conduct, manner of life (an old meaning of the word), in time past in the JeAVs' religion, in Jndaiion, that "system of Jewish faith and worship in its perverted form as one of blind attachment to rites and traditions, and of bigotry, self-right- eousness, and exclusiveness" (DOCTOR Hackett, in "Smith's Bible Diction- ary"). His zeal in persecuting Chris- I tians was the direct fruit of his Judaism. IIoAV that beyond measure, in 1 the excess of my zeal and prejudice, I persecuted the church of God, and "wasted it, more exactly, I wan I jio'-'^ccnting the church of Gael (gen- erally, collectively), and was destroying it, so far as lay in my power. This was what I was continuing to do, " pei^se- cuting this way unto death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women" (Acts 22 : 4), On church of God compare note on Acts 9 : 31 ; 20 : 28. 14. Closely connected with the pre- ceding verse. And profited, etc. Literally, I was adrancing, or pressing forward i)i Judais)n (see last verse) l)('. yond main/ of my owu age in my natio)i, or race, the Jews, an incidental proof, as Lightfoot remarks, that Paul was addressing (icntile converts. Being more exceedingly zealous, or more exceedingly a zealot, than many of Ch. 1.1 GALATIANS 61 15 But when it pleased God, Mvho sepa- rated me, from my mother's womb, and 16 called me by his grace, "to reveal his Son in me, that *>! might preach him among the heathen; immediately <^ I conferred not with flesh and blood : 17 '1 neither went I up" to Jerusalem to 15 fathers. But when God, he who set me apart from my mother's womb, and 16 called me through his grace, was pleas- ed to reveal his Son in me, that I should make known the glad news of him among the Gentiles ; straightway I did not confer with flesh and blood, See refs. Acts 9 : 15. c See refs. Deut. 33 a Matt. 16 : 17 I ; Acts 26 : 19, : 2 Cor. 4:6. *■ Soo rpfe. Acts 9 : 15. ). d See Acts 9 : 19-^:2. my age, of the traditions of my fathers (Acts 21 : 20, uote). Paul ap- pears to have belonged to the extreme party of the Pharisees (Acts 22 : s; 26 : 5), who were sticklers for the Pharisaic teachings and traditional interpreta- tions of the Old Testament, which were handed down from father to son (Matt. 15 : 2, note), and who prided themselves in being called "zealots of the law, zealots of God." How unlikely for such a man to become a Christian, and much more so an apo.stle. His intense prejudice and fanatical zeal rendered him proof against mere human influ- ence. Man under such circumstances could not have effected such a change of views, feelings, and conduct. His conversion must have been the work of God. It is evident, therefore, that be- fore his conversion there was no hu- man agency or instruction that made him a Christian, or taught him the gospel he preached. 15. Such was my condition and con- duct, Paul would say, up to my conver- sion ; But when it pleased God, more exactly. But ivhen God was pleased. Paul traces back his conver- sion to the good pleasure of God and his grace. Some critical texts omit God, but it seems to me to be the preferable reading. Who separated me, set me apart to my special mission and work. (Comp. Rom. 1:1; Jcr. 1:5.) Paul often traces back the purpose of God to eternity, but here only to his birth, or to the beginning of his life. And called me by, through, his grace, his unmerited favor toward me. Living in Asia Minor, both a Jew and a Roman citizen by birth, Paul knew and understood both Juda- ism and paganism, and was the fitting man, called of God to preach the gos- pel to all classes of the Roman Gentile world. 16. To reveal — dependent on the verb at the beginning of the preceding verse : When God tvas pleaded ... to reveal his Son in me, icithin my soul, as mj' Saviour and as the Saviour of sinners evervAvhere, discovering his glories, his righteousness, and his grace. (Comp. John 17 : 3. ) The apprehension of Christ as his Saviour and of the great truths concerning him and his salva- tion was revealed, supernaturally dis- closed to him in his own experience. It was a divine revelation. ( Comp. ver. 12. ) And the object was that I might preach him among the heathen, that I should proclaim the good news of him among the Gentiles. From the very beginning God designed that he should be an apostle to the Gentiles and that he should preach the gospel he did. Thus he received his apostleship and gospel not from men, nor through men, but by revelation (ver. 12). When, therefore, Christ as a universal Sav- iour and salvation by grace were re- vealed to him as actual facts in his own experience, then Jewish legalism and narrowness left him. Then he Avas prepared to receive the first intimation of his Gentile mission (Acts 26:17), "a chosen vessel to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the chil- dren of Israel " (Acts 9 : 15). Imme- diately, ui^on this revelation, I con- ferred not with flesh and blood. I did not apply to and seek counsel of weak and fallible man, of any human being as opposed to God. (see ou Matt. 16:17.) I did not consult any human being about engaging in the work to which I was so clearly called. 17. The adverb immediately modi- fies the four verbs that follow it in the last verse and in this: I did not confer, I did not go up, I went aivay, and re- turned. These all followed as soon as intervening circumstances would per- mit. There was no needless delay. (See on Acts 9: 19.) Neither WCnt I up, immediately or straightway, to Jerusalem to them which were 62 GALATIANS [Ch. 1. them which were apostles before me : but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus. 18 Then after three years « I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode witli 19 him fifteen days : but other of the apos- 17 nor go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me, but I went away into Arabia, anrl returned again 18 to Damascus. Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to beconie ac- quainted with Ceplias, and alx)de with 19 him fifteen duvs. But no other of the e AcU 9 : 26. apostles before, j^rior to, me, to seek advice and instruction from tlicm. Priority is the only distinction he ac- cords them above liiniself. But I went away into Arabia as soon as I could make my arrangements to go. Arabia lay between the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf; the northern part was contiguous to Palestine and ex- tended northward and eastward toward Damascus. It has been supposed by many that Paul only visited some por- tion of Arabia near Damascus, but it accords better with the language, went away into Arabia, and with 4 : 25, that he visited the vicinity of ^Mt. Sinai. His object was probai)ly not to preach the gospel to the Arabians, al- though he may have embraced occa- sional opportunities (Acts 2 : ii : 9 : 19, 20), but rather to commune with his own heart and with God, and in the very place where the law was given to learn the design of the law, that by its deeds "no flesh shall be justified," and that while " tlie law Avorketh wrath," "Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law being made a curse for us." As to the length of time he was there, all is uncertain. It must have been less than three years (ver. I8), and may have 1)een about two years. ( romp. Acts 9 : 19. 2:<, and iioits. ) After hc re- turned again unto Damascus he appears to have spent some time in preaching there the gospel (Acts 9: 22). The fact that Luke iii the Acts omits ref- erence to this visit to Arabia, favors the view that Paul's visit to Arabia was not a preaching tour. Damascus, prob- ably the oldest city in the world, is situated about one hundred and forty miles northeast of Jerusalem (<;i". u : i5: 15 : 2). The .lewish population was very large, estimated at fifty thousand. (See note on Acts 9:2.) It is Still one of the most prosperous cities of Western Asia. It is interesting to compare this account with Luke's narrative in the Acts. One of the incidental agree- ' raents may be found in the words, " re- ; turned again to Damascus," implying that it was the place of his conversion, and the place whence he started for Arabia. (Comp. " Harmonic Arrange- ment of the Acts," ^i^ 10, 17, on this whole section.) 18. Paul x^i'oceeds to speak of his relation to the apostles and the Jeru- salem church. After three years, according to Jewish reckoning, por- tions of three successive years, al)out equivalent to tlie third year from his conversion, which was the great epoch of his life. (St^c ou ver. 17.) As imme- diately (ver. ifi) was from his conver- sion, and as the force of the adverb ex- tends to the end of ver. 17, so then after naturally refers back to the same point. "I straightway conferred not with flesh and l)lood, it was only in the third year that I went up to Jerusalem." The purpose of his going up he states to have been to see, to make the personal acquaintance of, Peter, rather of Cephas, his Aramaic name, accord- ing to the best text (2:9: John 1 : 42). His purpose was not for instruction, but for a friendly visit, to become ac- quainted with Peter, who, by his bold- ness and natural leadership, held a prominent place among the apostles at Jerusalem, and would be the more largely known outside and to Paul l>y reputation. And abode, remained, with him fifteen days. The prepo- sition with denotes the company of one who had come to another for social in- tercourse or as a guest (i for. i6 : 7). Paul mentions the fifteen days, doubt- less, to show that it was too short a time for one who had enjoyed revela- tions from the Lord and had been preaching three years to gain any thor- ough instruction from Peter. There was time for a mutual relation of expe- riences, of trials, and successes, but not time for getting down to study and in- struction. i.,uke tells us also that dur- ing this time Paul was preaching and Ch. I.] GALATIANS 68 ties saw I none, save ^ James s the Lord's 20 brother. Now the things which 1 Avrite unto you, ^ behold, before God, I lie not. 21 i Afterwards I came into the regions of apostles did I see, but only James, the 20 brother of the Lord. Now as to the things which 1 write to you, behold be- 21 fore God, I lie not. Then I came into f James 1:1. g Matt. 13 : 55 ; Mark 6 : 3. Ji 2 Cor. 11 : 10, 11, 1 Acts 9 : 30. disputing with the Grecian Jews (Acts 9 : 28, 29). Also that he escaped for his life from Damascus and then from Jeru- salem (Acts 9 : 25, 30), Thesc incidents Paul had no occasion to state in this Epistle, since they had no special bear- ing on the independence of his gospel and apostolic authority. It may also be added that in these iifteen days Peter had ample time to see what Paul was and to have discarded him if he regarded his doctrines or methods as erroneous. 19. But other of the apo.stles, putting them on a level with Peter, ' saw 1 none. He saw but one of the Twelve, a fact which also bears on the question of his independence of the older apostles. Save James the Lord's brother; a better rendering is, but only James iVid I see, etc., hav- , ing a somewhat (Khrrsative force, rather than exceptive. Thus the Bible Union , and Improved versions render : And no other of the apostles did I see, but only \ James the brother of the Lord — men- j tioned because he was a pillar in the 1 church (2:9) at Jerusalem and also an apostolic man, having been so long ac- quainted with Jesus and also having seen Jesus after his resurrection (icor. 15 : ■). He is not called an apo.stle in 2 : 7-9, and being pastor of the church at Jerusalem he did not fill the office of an apostle in the highest sense, in- asmuch as he presided over the local church at Jerusalem (Acts 15), and did not go out as a missionary in planting churches. The above rendering, but only, is demanded bv the sense in Luke 4 : 26, 27 ; Rev. 9:4; 21 : 27 ; and a similar phrase is so used in 2 : 16. It seems to be the one required here. So " Thayer's Lexicon." Luke (Acts 9 : 27) relates that Barnabas introduced Paul to the apostles, which is in harmony with this passage, since Peter repre- sented the apostolic body, the others be- ing absent on their missionary work. But which James was this ? Some say, James the son of Alpheus and of a Mary, a sister of Mary the mother of Jesus, and hence a cousin of Jesus. But this is without Scripture evidence, and it is also unlikely that there should be two Marys in the same family. It is generally admitted that he was James the Just, and pastor of the church at Jerusalem. If brother of the Lord is not used in the sense of cousin, then James must have been the son of Jo- seph by a former marriage, or else he was the son of Jo.seph and Mary, a younger brother of Jesus. Lightfoot holds the former view. But the latter view seems the more natural one and is beset with fewer difficulties; and is held by the majority of modern schol- ars. (See uote ou Mark 6 : 3, aud •• Schaff- Herzog Eucyc.') He was uot ouc of the Twelve, for the brethren of Jesus did not fully believe on him before his resurrection (Joi'" ' ■ ^). Some early writers style Paul the thirteenth and James the fourteenth apostle. 20. The apo.stle gives his affidavit, as it were, to his statement regarding the object and brevity of this first visit to Jerusalem after his conversion, show- ing his independence of the other apos- tles. His solemn and positive declara- tion shows how important and vital he regarded the question of his inde- pendent apostolic teaching and author- ity. Now as to the thinsrs which I write nnto you, behold, I solemnly assert before God, I lie not. ( Conip. Rom. 9:1: 2 Tim. 4 : 1 ; 1 Thess. 5 : 27.) It would seem that the Judaizing teach- ' ers had represented Paul as inferior to the twelve apostles, and that he had re- ceived the gospel at second-hand from them. They thus would bring discredit on him and his preaching. " If a re- port had been spread in Galatia that after his conversion he spent years at Jerusalem, and received regular in- struction in Christianity at the hands of the apostles, this last fact would naturally cause amazement and need a strong confirmatory asseveration " (Al- FORD). 21. Afterwards, after the fifteen days spent with Peter, I came into 64 GALATIANS [Ch. I. 22 Syria and Cilicia; and was unknown by face unto the churches of Judea 2:? which ^ wc iv in Christ: but they had heard only. Tliat ' he which persecuted us in tinies i)ast now preacheth the 24 faith which once he destroyed. And ">they glorified God in me. 22 the regions of Syria and Cilicia: and was unknown by face to the churches 23 of Judrea which" were in Christ ; but they were only hearing. He who was once our persecutor now preaches the faith which once he was destroying ; 24 and they glorified God in me. k Rom. 16 : 7 ; 1 Cor. I See 1 Tim. 1 : 13-16. m Acts 21 : 19, 20. the re§fioiis of Syria and Cilicia — thus separatctl and remote from the other apostles. Syria being nearer and the more important would naturally be named first ; and that is also the order in which they are elsewhere named ( Acts 15 : 23, 41 ). Bcsldcs, Paul may have performed his more important labors in Syria. In the Acts it is related that Paul went from Jerusalem to Ca'sarea and thence to Tarsus, where Barnabas went to seek him (Acts 9 : SO; ll : 25); that Paul did most important work at Antioch of Syria, and that there were churches in Syria and Cilicia, doubt- less the result, at least in part, of Paul's labors in those regions (Acts ii : 26: 15 : ■«i ) . The tw o accounts are evidently in- dependent, but not in conflict. Their diiierences are such as really to inspire confidence in each. 22. Paul continues: and Avas still nnknown during all of that time by face unto the churches,as to his per- sonal appearance, known only bj' repu- tation. The churches of Judea appear to l)e those outside of Jerusalem where he was known. The churches are de- scribed and designated as those which were in Christ, united in him as their Head. They were Christian churches or assemblies, not Jewish as- semblies, as were the synagogues. It should be noted tliat they were local churches. Tiiese had probably been organized since the martyrdom of Ste- phen, before which there seems to have l)een but one church, that at Jerusa- lem. (Soo ou Acts 9 : 31.) 23, But they had heard only, more exactly, nrre o)ih/ hearing the re- port, that he irfio once persecuted us now preacheth the faith, that sys- tem of belief, which once he de- stroyed, ivhieh he once icas destroy- ing. Faith in connection with the gos- pel always in the New Testament in- cludes the idea of a personal trust in Christ, but may also include that form of truth which is received bv faith in Christ, all that is embraced in the glad tidings of salvation, faith being its great and central characteristic (Acts 6 : 7 ; Jude .3, 20 : 1 Tim. 3 : 9 ; 5 : 8 ; 6 : 10, 21 ; 2 Tim. 4:7). Paul was preaching that faith, system, or gospel which he once was destroying by persecuting those who had trustingly received it. It does not, however, appear that faith is ever used in the New Testament in its later sense to denote simply a system of Chris- tian doctrine except in Jude 3. 24. And, continues the apostle, they glorified God, gave praise and glory to God, in me, seeing in my case, in me, the grace of God. They thus saw in him a ground and an occasion for glorifying God. The Judean Christians manifested no oppo- sition, but recognized Paul as a true gospel preacher, which was in marketl contrast to tlie conduct of the Judaiz- ing leaders in Galatia. And all this shows that he could not have been at Jerusalem under apostolic instruction. Practical Eemarks. 1. An apostle was one called of God through Jesus Christ personally. So of the Twelve ; so of Paul ; so of Matthias through the lot (ver. 1 ; Luke 6 : 13 ; Acts 1 : 23-26; 26:16). 2. Apostolic churches were local churches composed of disciples who met together for worship and the observance of the ordinances (ver. 2, 22 ; 1 Cor. 1:2; 1 Thess. 1 : 1). 3. Jesus Christ is the source of grace and peace equally with the Father. Such incidental evidences to his divinity are most important (ver. 3 ; Rom. 5:1; John 14 : 27). 4. Christ's death was voluntary, the outgoing of divine love, according to a divine plan, in order to our salvation (ver. 4 ; John 3 : 16 ; Heb. 10 : 8-10). fi. The glory of tlie plan of redemption and of our own individual .'salvation be- Ch. II.] GALATIANS 65 longs wholly to God (ver. 5 ; 1 Cor. 1 : 31 ; Rom. 11 :36"). 6. The gospel of Jesus Christ is a well- defiued message of salvation, and is in- violate and must be kept so (ver. 6 ; Acts 20: 20, 21,27; 3 John 4-11), 7. The world is ever seeking after an- other gospel (ver. 7 ; 1 Cor. 1 : 21 ; Col. 2:8). 8. How painful to the Christian min- ister is the falling away of converts. He may treat these with tender surprise while he severely rebukes their leaders (ver. 6, 7 ; 2 Cor. 6 : 11, 12 ; Jude 4, 11). 9. How terrible the sin of perverting the gospel of Christ. As it is fatally in- jurious and destructive of men, it de- serves and will receive the curse of God (ver. 7-9 ; Matt. 23 : 13-15 ; Acts 8 : 20-22). 10. The Christian, and especially the Christian minister, should ever be guided by the highest of motives— the good pleas- ure and glory of God (ver. 10 ; John 5 : 30 ; 1 Peter 4: 2). 11. The gospel is a revelation of Jesus Christ, and has conclusive evidence of its divine origin (ver. 11; Eph. 3 : 14-19; John 1 : 12-17). 12. " Human teaching, human tradition, though it come down from holy fathers and teachers from the holy church her- self, is in itself nothing ; for in all this there may be error, just because it is human " (Luther). (Ver. 11, 12 ; Isa. 8 : 20; Rev. 22: 18, 19.) 13. A Christian can refer to his past wicked life when he does it in such a way ■as to abase self and glorify God (ver. 13, 14 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 10; 1 Tim. 1 : 12-16). 14. Persecution is a natural product of formalism, legalism, and bigotry. Zeal and sincerity only make the persecution more intense, and by no means excuse it or make a wrong right (ver. 13, 14 ; Acts 26 : 9-11). 15. God often destines persons for im- portant vocations from their birth (ver. 15; Jer. 1:5; Luke 1 : 13-15). 16. A young man may go far astray and become very wicked, and yet be intended by God for important service in his king- dom. So of Newton, Bunyan, Augustine, and Paul (ver. 13-16). 17. A revelation of Christ in the soul is an essential prerequisite to preaching the gospel aright (ver. 16 ; 2 Cor. 4 : 13). 18. We should render prompt and cheer- ful obedience to whatever duty or course of life the Lord may call us (ver. 16 ; Acts 26:19,20). 19. God assigns to his people their work, and often, by his providence and grace, trains men up in a remarkable way for future usefulness (ver. 16-18 ; Acts 9 : 15, 16; 22: 18-21). 20. The obscure periods of one's life are often most important as preparatory for future active and effective labor (ver. 17 ; Lukel :80; 2:40,51,52). 21. Ministers of the gospel should live in harmony with each otlier, and exer- cise loving and friendly intercourse (ver. 18, 19; 2 Tim. 3 : 10, 11). 22. We should so live as to be able to appeal to God in reference to our failures in either word or deed (ver. 20; Rom. 9:1). 23. The visiting of friends and brethren is often seasonable and profitable ; but to be wholly absorbed in one's work and calling is ever better (ver. 19-22). 24. God is to be glorified in his servants. The conversion of wicked men and vio- lent opposers of Christ strikingly mani- fests the grace of God, and is a cause of thanksgiving and praise (ver. 23, 24; Acts 11: 18). CHAPTER II. In this chapter Paul continues to vindicate historically his independent apostolic authority. In another visit to Jerusalem his gospel was approved, and his apostleship to the Gentiles was recognized (ver. i-io). And later still, at Antioch, he exercised his apos- tolic authority in rebuking Peter for inconsistency, and he insists on Cliris- tian liberty and salvation by faith in Jesus Christ alike to Jew and Gentile (ver. 11-21). 1-10. PaFL'S APOSTOLIC AUTHOR- ITY AND PREACHING RECOGNIZED BY THE LEADING APOSTLES AT JERUSA- LEM. After fourteen years, Paul went up by revelation to Jerusalem with Barnabas and Titus, and they yielded not for a moment to Judaizing teach- ers (ver. 1-5). He received neither in- struction nor authority from the other 66 GALATIANS [Ch. II. 2 THEN fourteen years after » I went up again to Jerusalem with » Barnabas, 2 and took Titus with lac also. And I went up by revelation, pand eommuni- cated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles ; but pri- 2 THEN, after fourteen years, I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, 2 taking also Titus with me. And I went up according to a revelation, and laid before them the gospel which I preach among the Gentiles; but pri- Acls 15 : 2-4. 0 Acts 4 : 36, 37. p Acts 15 : 12. apostles, but, on the contrary, a recog- nition that he was entrusted with the gospel for the Uentiles, and the hand of fellowship from James, Peter, and .John (ver. 6-10.). 1, Paul's third visit to Jerusalem. Then fourteen years after I went up asjain to Jerusalem. After what? ISome say his conversion ; others, after his visit just spoken of in 1 : 18. The latter view seems to me the preferable one, for (1) It is most natu- ral to reckon from the event last men- ti(med, his first visit to Jerusalem ; (2) " Then" is repeated three times (i ; i8, 21 ; 2 : 1)^ and seems to point to succes- sive events ; (3) "Again " points back to the first visit, and aftbrds a reasona- ble presumption that this visit is reck- oned from the former. But what visit was this? Some regard it the same as that recorded in Acts 11 :30; 12 : 25. But this occurred in A. D. 44, which is generally acknowledged as too early. Besides, it was a time of persecution (Acts 12 : 1 ), and the apostles were proba- bly scattered from Jerusalem. Indeed, it is not certain that Paul and Barnabas made more than a passing visit to the city at that time (Acts 12 : 25). It should be noted that the relief was for the "brethren that dwelt in Judea," and that it was " sent to the elders l)y the hand of Barnabas and Saul" (Acts 11 : M). The apostles are not even named. More generally this visit is regarded as the same as that related in the fifteenth chapter of the Acts. The place, per- sons, sul).ject of dispute, general char- acter, and results of the conference are the same in botli accounts. They agree well in time. The conference referred to in tlie Acts occurred in A. D. 50 or 51. If Paul was converted in A. D. 35, a very probable time for his first visit to Jerusalem would be early in A. D. 38, and fourteen years after, reckoned ac- cording to the Jewish method, would bring us to the autumn of A. D. 50, or periiaps into A. D, 51. There are no real discrepancies between the two ac- counts. The differences are such as might be expected. Luke, as a histo- rian, gives the more public account of the conference, as related to the churches. Paul gives the more private account, as related to himself. See this whole matter discussed in my "Har- mony of the Acts," ^ 28. With Barnabas— the name sig- nifying "Son of Consolation," one gifted in teaching, admonishing, and consoling. He was Paul's companion in missionary labors from their com- mission as missionaries until their sharp contention in regard to !Mark (Acts 13: 2; 15: 36). Bamabas accom- panied Paul as the leader (Acts is : 2). Earlier Barnabas is named first, and ap- pears more prominent (Acts 9 : 27 ; 11 : 22, 30; 12 : 25; 13 : 1-15). TitUS AVith me ! also, in addition to Barnabas. Titus is j not mentioned in the Acts, but is in- cluded in "certain others" (Acts 15 ; 2). j He was one of Paul's converts (Tims 1:4), and witli Timothy, among the most trusted helpers of Paul. He was with Paul at f^phesus in his third mis- sionary journey, and was sent by Paul on a mission to Corinth (2 Cor. 7 • u ; 12 : 18). A little later he was sent again to Cor- inth from Macedonia (2 Cor. 8 : 6, 16-24), After his first Roman imprisonment Paul wrote to Titus in Crete (Titus 1 : 5). Paul speaks of him in his second Ro- man imprisonment (2 Tim. 4 : 10). He died in Crete, where he had been pastor and missionary. 2. I went up by, in accordance trith, revelation, how i-eceived we are not told. (■'^ee on 1 : 12, mui conip. Acts 16 : 9; 20 : 23, 22 : 17.) While llC WaS di- vinely directed by revelation, he was at the same time sent from Antioch as a messenger to the Jei-usalem conference. Paul's account siippk'incntsand rounds out the narrative of Luke. And comniuuieated unto, rather, /aid before, them, the church at Jerusa- lem, that grospel which I preach amoni; the (ientiles. This he did as one who had up to this time been eu- Ch. II.] GALATIANS 67 vately to them which were of reputa- tion, lest by any means I should run, 3 or had run, in vain. But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was 4 compelled to be circumcised. And that vately, before those of repute, lest by any means I should be running, or 3 had run in vain. But not even Titus, who was witli me, being a Greek, was 4 compelled to be circumcised ; and that tirely independent of them. His gospel was the doctrine of a gracious salvation through faith in Christ, justification by faith apart from obedience to the Mosaic law. The Judaizers held to justification by w^orks as a ground of merit, in addition to or in connection with faith in Christ. Paul held to its universal otTer to Jews and Gentiles alike ; the Judaizers demanded of Gen- tiles circumcision as a condition, and the consequent obedience to the law of Moses (5:3; Acts 15 : i), for salvatiou, or the full enjoyment of Messianic bless- ings. This gospel he was continuing to proclaim, for he says, Which I preach. He laid this before them, not publicly at first, nor secretly, for he had no desire to cover up the truth, but privately to them which were of reputation, those who were highly es- teemed, and looked up to as " pillars" (ver. 9)j such as James, Peter, and John, and the elders ( Acts i5 : 4 ) . This was both an act of courtesy toward the aj^ostles and the officers of the church, ancl also a wise precaution in preparing the way for the public conference. And I did this, Paul adds, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain. Some eminent inter- preters read this interrogatively, in- qiiiring, whether perchance I might be ranning, or had run to no purpose in the judgment of the apostles and the leaders of the cluirch at Jerusalem. He had no doubt himself about the matter, and in view of the " revelation " given him, he had no doubt of the issue. But it was necessary that the appeal should be made, and that tliey should declare themselves resjjecting his gospel and his apostolic character. It seems to me, however, better to take this clause as expressing Paul's object or design, lest perchance I should seem to herunning, or to have run, to no purpose. His object was to secure their approval, not because of any uncertainty in his own mind as to the character or success of his work, but for the moral eflect upon both Jewish and Gentile believers and churches. If the apostles and the Jerusalem church had not ai)proved, it would have been disastrous in the ex- treme. It would have resulted in the separation of the Gentile churches from the Jewish, the final success of the former and the ultimate ruin of the lat- ter. But such a result in the designs of God could not have been. Paul doubtless had been so guided by revelation, and was working so consciously within the Avill of God, that he had no doubt of the result of the conference in aiiproving his conduct and preaching. Notice Paul uses the figure of the race, run- ning. 3. But so far from appearing to be running in vain, so far from the ai)os- tles disapproving of my gospel and conduct, neither, rather, not even, Titus, Aviio was with me, being a Greek (hence a Gentile), was com- pelled to be circumcised. Paul had brought Titus with him as a speci- men of Gentile converts, to show what the gospel could do for an uncircum- cised Gentile, and also as a test ease. In not i^ressing the demand to have Titus circumcised they conceded the whole case to Paul against his Judaiz- ing opposers. It is implied that these Judaizers demanded the circumcision of Titus ; and very probably some of the apostles and leaders were at first in favor of a temporizing policy, in the hope of conciliating these intruders. The apostle had shown a conciliatory spirit in the circumcision of Timothy, whose mother was a Jewess (Acts 16 : 3). But when it was demanded that Titus, a Gentile, must be circumcised, as a condition of Christian recognition and fellowship, and by Pharisaic Judaizers as a condition of justification, a vital principle was involved. To this Paul could not yield ; and he was not com- pelled to accede to the demand of false brethren. Paul and his gospel were sustained. 4. This verse is connected with the last. The construction is difficult and the meaning obscure. It seems to me that this and the next verse are an ex- pansion of the last clause of the last 68 GALATIANS [Cii. IT. because of i false brethren ^ unawares brought in. who caiiie in privily to spy out our 9 liberty wliich we have in Christ Jesus, Hhat they might bring us 5 into bondage : to whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour ; tiiat "the truth of the gospel might 6 continue with you. But of those who because of the false brethren stealth- ily brought in, who crept in to spy out our freedom which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring as into 5 bondage ; to whom not even for an hour did we yield by the [required] subjection, that the truth of the g(»spel 6 might abide with you. But from those J Acts 15: 1,24; 2 Cor. 11 : 26. r 2 Peter 2:1. u Ver. 14 ; 3 ; « 4 : 3, 9 ; Acts 15 : 10. verse and give reasons why Titus was I not compelled to ]>e circumcised; namely, because of false teachers, the ! bondage, and the determined resistance : of the apostle. Titus was not com- | pellcd to be circumcised, and that because of false brethren un- awares brought in, more exactly, bronyht in by stealth, the Judaizers (Acts 15 : 1), who came in privily, or, who crept in, to spy out our lib- erty, our liberty of being Christians and enjoying Christian privileges inde- pendently of Jewish law, that (their object being that) they might bring us into bondage to the Mosaic law, into al)ject slavery (a strong word) to a legal and Pharisaic system of salvation by works. These false Ijrethren were probably those who had come down from Jerusalem and taught that cir- cumcision was necessary to salvation. They were thus troublers among the CJen'tile Christians at Antioch. And doubtless they, or their representatives, were present at Jerusalem to use their intluence against Paul and the distinc- tive gosju'l he preached (i : f ; 4 : it ; 6 : I-')- Tlie character of these fiilse breth- ren, tlieir surreptitious manner of pro- cedure, and the slavery they proposed to put on both Jewish and Gentile con- verts, were sufficient reasons for the apostles and the leaders of the Jerusa- lem church not to insist on the circum- cision of Titus. Paul must have urged these reasons with great power. (See end of ne.xt verse.) 5. But more still. Paul positively refused to sacrifice principle and the freeddm which riglitfully Itelonged to (lenlile believers. To whom, to these false bretliren, we (Paul, liarnabas, and Titus) gave place by the required subjection; or better, ire did )wl yiild by tlie submission required of us by these false brethren, no, not even for an hour, expressive of an indeti- nitely short time, as we would say, not even for a single moment. And they took this positive stand in order that the truth of the gospel, that man, Jew or Gentile, is justitieil l)y faith iii Jesus Christ and not by works of the law, might continue with you. Gentiles of Galatia and elsewhere. "We have here the first glimpse of the free- dom which the apostle maintains and the bondage he opposes in this Epistle. Obligation to obey the law as a means of salvation was bondage. Freedom was found in his union with Christ and a consequent service of grateful love. He was not under law, but un- der grace (4 : 4-6, :n ; 5 : 1-0), Paul op- posed the Pharisaic bondage demanded of him (ver. 4) and would not yield to it, and he advocated and successfully maintained the freedom of believei-s, especially the Gentile, from all meri- torious obedience to the ^losaic law. In thus taking the stand and maintain- ing it he achieved an inmiortal victory in behalf of the Gentile world, ."ile was the great champion of the ' inde- pendence, completeness, and sufficiency of Christianity. lie declares that it does not need to be and must not be, mixed up with ]\Iosaicism, of which it is the fulfillment, and from which it is fiee" (G. B. t tr. ). (J. In this and the three verses that Ch. II.] GALATIANS 6*9 seemed to be somewhat— whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me ; ^God accepteth no man's person; for they who seemed to he y somewhat, in conference added nothing to me. But contrariwise, ^ when tliey saw that tlie gospel of the uncircumcision was com- mitted unto me, "as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; (for he reputed to be somewhat,— whatever they were, it matters not to me, God accepts not man's person,— to me I say 7 those of repute imparted nothing. But, on the contrary, when they saw that I had been intrusted with the gospel of the uncircumcision, as Peter was with 8 that of the circumcision; (for he who wrought for Peter in respect to the X Deut. 10 : 17. y 2 Cor. 12 : 11. z Acts 13 : 46 ; Rom. 11 : 13 ; 2 Tim. 1 : 11. Acts 3 : 12-26. follow the construction is difficult and broken, and different parts are much discussed. But the general meaning is plain. Paul affirms that he received neither instruction nor authority from those in repute, but a recognition from them that he had been entrusted with the gospel to the Gentiles as Peter had been with the gospel to the Jews. God had so manifestly wrought by him among the Gentiles that James, Peter, and John gave him, and Barnabas with liim, pledges of their approval and friendship. Biit^ in contrast to those false brethren, of those who seemed to be somewhat, rather, /yo//i those who were and are held in high reputa- tion by the churches, and especially by you and your leaders. The verb may be either past or present. Indeed, both ideas can be very naturally included. The apostles and leaders had been, and were still, highly esteemed both among Jews and Gentiles. And these false brethren appear to have used this high reputation to the disadvantage of Paul, as if he was necessarily inferior in knowledge and apostolic authority to them. Paul was about to say that from those in high repute he received nothing new. But he breaks off" the sentence in order to introduce a parenthetical thought before finishing what he was about to say. (Whatsoever they were, or, better, whatever they once were as the chosen attendants of Christ during his public ministry, it maketh no matter to me. I do not care for that, for God accepteth no man's person'; he is no respecter of persons (Kom. 2 : 11 ; Kph. 6:9; Col. 3 :25), and lie does not judge and confer favors accord- ing to rank and outward appearances and advantages.) It seems very prob- able that these false brethren made much of the advantages that the early apostles had over Paul l)y their personal intercourse with our Lord. But Paul affirms his entire independence of them ; he was entirely dependent on God (1 : 15, 16). Paul is not speaking in detraction or sneeringly of the apos- tles. He held them in " high esteem " and as " pillars," though he was inde- pendent of them. The apostle now resumes the broken sentence, its construction, however, modified by the intervening remark. For is resumptive and introduces a reason for what he had just said. Me is emphatic. Translate For the fact is, to me those of reputation communicated, or imparted nothing by adding to my teaching. They imparted nothing new, no additional knowledge. Those of re- pute recognized his equality with them. They saw" nothing incorrect or defective in his gospel, and so there was no need of imparting to him fresh instruction. 7. The last verse presents the nega- tive side, this verse the positive. But contrariwise, the very opposite was the case; so far from correcting my teaching or imparting any new truth, when they saw from my explana- tions and the results as made known by Barnabas and seen in Titus (comp. Acts 15 : 12), that I have been entrusted (l)oth a past and a present possession) with the gospel of the uncircumci- sion among the Gentiles as Peter teas with that of the circumcision among the Jews. The sentence is again broken to give place to a parenthetical thought in the next verse and is completed in ver. 9. Paul does not mean that there were two gospels, one for the Jew and another to the Gentiles, for this con- tradicts his strong affirmation in 1 : 6-9 and his teaching elsewhere (Rom. i : ifi). The distinction is not of doctrine, for the disease of sin is the same in all and the remedy is one and alike adapted to all (Rom. 3 : lit. 21-23, 28, 29) ; but it rather indicates the spheres of operations and methods of work and adaptations to the 70 GALATIANS [Cii. II. that wrought effectuully in Peter to the apostleship of the cireumeision, bthe isanie was mighty in me toward tlie 9 Gentiles:) and when 'James, ^ Cephas, and Jolni, who seemed to be ^piUurs, pereeived fthe graee that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the riglit ha"niis of fellowsliip; sthat we t>hoiiUI ijo unto the lieathen, and they 10 unto the eireumcision. Only they ivoid'd apostleship of the circumcision, wrought for me also in respect to the 9 Gentiles;) and having learned the grace that was given to me, James and Cephas and John, who were reputed to be pillars, gave to me and Barnabas right hands of fellowship, that we should go to the Gentiles, and they 10 to the circumcision ; only, that we 6 Acts 9: 15; 13 : 2 ; 15 : 12 ; 26: 17, 18; 1 Cor. 15:10; Col. 1 : 29. cl : 19. d Acts 15 : 7. e Malt. 16 : 18 ; Eph. 2 : 20 ; Rev. 21 : 14. / See refs. Rom. 1:5. g Acts 15 : 22, etc. two great classes, the Jews and Gen- tiles. Peter was indeed tiie tirst to preach the gospel to tlie Gentiles, but that was merely to unlock the door of the kingdom to tliem (Acts 15 : u) ; liis chief work was among the circumcised. 8. This verse is parenthetical, con- tinning and explaining the preceding verse. For he that wrought ef- fectually in Peter to the apostle- ship of the circumcision, rather, For /((', that is, God, who irrought for Peter in respect to tlie iipostleship of the cireiuncision, making him successful in every respect in his apostolic calling among tlie Jews ( Acts 2 : 12, 37 ; 3 : 12 ; 5 : 15, eio.); irrought uho for me in respect to the (le)itites by abnlidant and successful labors, attended by the power of the Spirit and by signs and mighty deeds (Acts 15:4; Koiii. 15 : lo-iii), Tlicrc is, in- deed, a marked parallel between the labors and the success of Peter and Paul, running through the Acts of the Apostles. Compare, lor instance, Pe- ter's sermon on the Day of Pentecost with Paul's at Antioch in Pisidia ; the healing of the lame man at the gate of tlie temple and Peter's encounter witli Simon Magus, with Paul's healing the (•ripi)le at I^ystra and his encounter witii Klymas, the sorcerer. The two, l*eter and Paul, are historically linked together from early apostolic days (1 (or. 1 : 12 ; 3 : 22 ; 9:5; 2 Hettr 3 : 15). 1>. The sentence begun in ver 7 is (•omi)lete(l. The order of the words in thf original is : And when they per- ceived the jirace that was given nil', tlie evident favor of (Jod witness- ing to and authenticating my apostlc- shii>, James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be, or, irho were re- piifril to he, accounted as pillars. The eliureh at .lerusalem is viewed under tlie familiar figure (»f a temple, a fre- • jUeilt metaphor (l for. a : ItJ ; 2 Cor. 6 : 16.) 1 They saw the tokens of his apo-stlcshi]) (ver. 7) and as a consequence Xhvy per- ceived, a result of their judgment and conviction, that the grace of God was with him. Under this full persuasion and conviction, Paul says, they gave I to me and Barnabas (omit the arti- cle the) right hands of fellow ship, expressive of approval, confidence, I and fellowship in the truth, as well as I a pledge of tidelity to them in their missionary work. Extending the right '. hand was a common token of confi- dence and of a pledge given. The pur- pose of giving them right hands of fel- lowship was to express their approval and agreement, that we should go as missionaries and ajjo.'^tles unto the heathen, the iientiles, and they unto the circumcision. They wel- comed us as fellow-laborers, though in diflerent spheres and fields of missionary work. It should be noticed that James is named first, doubtless because he was pastor of the church at Jerusalem, and because of his great piety, and his re- lationship to our Lord as his brother. He needed not the latter distinctive title now, as James the brother of John had suHered martyrdtnn (Acts 12 : 2). Peter holds the first place in the lists of the apostles and as missionary among the Jews ; James in connection with special acts of the church at Jerusalem ; Paul as an apostle and missionary among the Gentiles. Barnabas also received [ right hands of fellowshi}), being one I with Paul in his presentation of the gospel, and associated with him in I missionary labors among the Gentiles. This conclusion was general ; not that Paul should confine himself exclusively to Cientiles, nor the others to Jews. The fact that no others of the apostles are named is conclusive evidence that j they were not present. Where they I were it is idle to speculate. Ch. II.] GALATIANS 71 that we should remember the poor; h the same which I also was forward to do. 11 >But when Peter was come to An- should remember the poor, which very thing I was also zealous to do. 11 But when Cephas came to Antioch, I h See refs. Acts 11 : 29, 30 ; 2 Cor. 8, 9. 10. But tliey gave right hands of fellowship with one specification and request : Only they asked us that we should remember the poor, in Judea and Jerusalem, which very thing I also was forward, or zealous, to do. This zeal to care for the poor is illustrated some years before this, on his second journey to Jerusalem with alms from Gentile converts (Acts ii : 29. 30), and some years after this on his fifth and last journey to Jerusalem (Rom. 15 : 26, 27, etc. ). Aud lie had not been neglectful to impress this on the churches of Galatia (i cor. le ; i). The change from the plural we to the singu- lar / may probably be accounted for by the fact that Paul and Barnabas separated before anj^ elibrt was made to carry out this request. The words, the poor, are general, but that it has reference to the poor saints in Judea is evident from the con- nection. Their poverty had been oc- casioned largely by the persecutions they suffered (Acts 9 : i, 2 ; 12 : i). The remembrance of tliem would show the sympathy of Gentile Christians, and an acknowledgment of their spiritual in- debtedness to Jewish believers (Rom. 15 : 27). Thus far Paul has shown historically his independence of the earlier apostles, both in regard to the gospel he preached and the apostleship he exercised. So far from deriving his gospel from them, he expounded his teaching and his methods to them, and they upon hear- ing it and learning the results of his ministry and the signs attending his work, gave their approval, acknowl- edged his claims, and treated him as on an equality with themselves. 11-3X. Paul's independence of THE CHIEFEST APOSTLE EXHIBITED, AND HIS APOSTOLIC AUTHORITY EX- ERCISED, IN HIS REBUKE OF PeTER AT Antioch for inconsistent con- duct. First we have Peter's changed attitude to Gentile Christians (ver. 11, 12) ; its influence on others, including even Barnabas (ver. 13), and Paul's pub- lic confrontal of Peter charging Ijini with inconsistency (ver. u). Then he substantiates his reproof by stating the doctrine of justification by faith, and applying it to the case in hand. Both Jews and Gentiles are justified alike by faith (ver. 15. 16), A commoii objection is met by stating that Christ does not promote sin in believers by justifying sinners (ver. 17) ; but that the believer makes liimse}f a transgressor, when he inconsistently strives to build up a righteousness through the law (ver. is). This the apostle sustains by his own ex- perience : Having died and been cruci- fied unto the world, he lives by faith unto God (ver. 19, 20) ; aiid by thus lay- ing aside all dependence on the law for justification he does not make void the grace of God ( ver. 21 ) . We of course have here but the outline and summary of Paul's statement and exposition of jus- tification by faith, and of the connec- tion of Christian liberty and salvation by Christ. He also so presents it as to prepare the way for the doctrinal dis- cussion that follows in Chap. HI. 11. But when Peter, rather Ce- phas, according to the best text, was come, or, came, on a certain later occa- sion, to Antioch. The time of this visit has been a matter of much discus- sion. It is naturally implied that what he had just related, as occurring at the apostolic conference, had already taken place. Paul appears in these two chap- ters to be recording events in chrono- logical order. And at first it would seem quite natural to put this rebuke of Peter at the time when Paul and Barna- bas " tarried at Antioch," after their return from the Jerusalem conference (.\ct3 15 : 35). But this seems too early for such a Judaistic reaction (Acts le : i, 5), and too soon for Peter to have acted contrary to the principles he had so earnestly advocated a little before at Jerusalem. It is better to suppose that the encounter occurred during Paul's brief sojourn at Antioch, after his second missionary journey (Acts is : 23). For this gives time for the op- position which had been suppressed to come again to the surface and gather 72 GALATIANS [Ch. II. tioch, I withstood him to the face, be- 12 cause he was to be blamed. For before that certain ^ came from James. ' he did eat with tlie CJcntiles: but when they were come, lie withdrew and separated himself. '" fearing them which were of 13 the cucumcision. And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; inso- withstood him to the face, because he 12 stood condemned. For before certain ones came from James, he ate with the Gentiles ; but when they came, he drew back and separated himself, fearing tho.se who were of the circumcision. 13 And the rest of the Jews also dissem- bled with him, so that Barnabas even k See Acis 21 : 18-25. {Acts 10 : 28; 11 : 3. m Prov. 29 : 25 ; see Matt. 26 : 69-75. strenjjcth. The dissension between Paul and Barnabas would naturally weaken the inlluence of the former upon the latter. ISce the matter discussed in " Ilarmonv of the Acts," ^g 29, 36, pp. 203, 219. I withstood him, resisted him, to the lace, because he was to be blamed, because he was condemned, by the very facts of the case, his dis- simulating conduct carried along with it his condemnation, as Paul goes on to show. Of course his conduct was con- demned and censured by Gentile Chris- tians, but this is not the immediate thought here implied. This encounter has been thought to throw discredit on Peter, especially, for such a grievous error, and on Paul for using such sever- ity, and on both, because such a dispute should have arisen between two inspired men. In regard to this it may be said that apostles were but imperfect men like others ; that the error of Peter con- sisted not in preaching false doctrine as the context shows, but in inconsist- ency of conduct (Acts 10 : 15; 11 : 3, 17; 15 : 9), which was liable to pervert the truth of the gospel ; and that his con- duct accorded with his character as f)ortrayed in the Gospels, boldness fol- owed by timidity. As to Paul's sever- ity, it was a manly stand for the truth, without rudeness or anger. Both Peter and Paul were one at heart, in love, and in the defense of the gospel, as is es- pecially shown by Peter's loving refer- ence, several years later, to "our be- loved brother Paul " in 2 Peter 3 : 15, 16. 12. In this verse and the next Paul gives the reason why he confronted and r('l)uke(l IV-ter. For before that certain came from James; but wiiether sent by him, or merely per- sons connected with the church of which James was pastor, we know not. I'rom their inlluence on Peter and others, tiiey seem not to have been "false brethren" who had come to "spy out our liberty" (ver. 4), but per- sons of influence. Doubtless coming from Jerusalem they brought messages from James, and in any case exceeded their instructions. The false brethren (ver. 4) were of the party of the Phari- sees who held that circumcision and the observance of the ^Io.saic law were necessary to salvation. The Jerusalem conference had decided that these were not necessary, and should not l)e im- posed on Jewish converts; but it left Jewish believers, just as they were, cir- cumcised, and observers of the law, not as a ground and means of salvation, but as observances connected with their race and nation. These persons from James appear to have made these ob- servances conditions of social fellow- ship, regarding the uncircumcised Gen- tile, although a Christian, as unclean. Peter had been taught ])y a vision to call no man common or unclean (Acts 10 : 28), and so before the coming of cer- tain persons from James, he did eat w^ith the Gentiles, which extended to the common meal, the love feast, if Practised among them, and to the lOrd's Supper. But when they were come, he withdrew and sep- arated himself (imperfect tense), i. e., he proceeded to draw hack and to separate himself, doing this one by one, and as occasion seemed to demand, being gradually overcome b5"ol)jections and persuasions. Thus he was virtually dividing tlie church into two ])()dies, Jewish and Gentile. And this he did, fearing them which Avere of the circumcision, Jewish Christians from Jerusalem, lest he give otl'ense to them and to the other converts from Judaism. Peter, though impulsively bold, suffered from timidity as a beset- ting sin (Mark 14 : 66-72). "The fcar of man bringeth a snare" (Prov. 29 : 25). 13. And the other Jews, the rest of the Jewish Cliristians, dissembled, Eractised hypocrisy, likewise with im. They were aware of Christian Ch. IL] GALATIANS 73 much that Barnabas also was carried 14 away with their dissimulation. But when I saw tliat they wallied not up- rightly according to ° the truth of the gospel, ° I said unto Peter before tlicni all, Pif thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews? was carried away with their dissimula- 14 tion. But when I saw that they walk- ed not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas in the presence of all : If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles and not that of Jews, how dost thou 15 compel the Gentiles to Judaize? We o Ps. 141 : 5 ; Prov. 27 : 5, 6 ; 1 Tim. 5 p Acts 10 : 28; U : 3. lil)erty, that they might eat with Gen- tiles, yet they acted as if it were unlaw- ful to do so. Doubtless Peter may have thought it expedient to yield at this time to Jewish prejudice, contrary to the divine instruction given him (Acts 10 : 13 ff.) and his previous custom, but in so doing he was striking tlie very foun- dation itself, and subverting a funda- mental principle of the gospel. His example carried not only the Jewish converts at Antioch, but even Bar- nabas, tlie enlightened and standi defender of Christian liberty (^ots 15. 2), was carried away with their dissimulation, so strong was this tide of Jewish ritualism. He was the last man to be moved, as it would seem, and Paul, a " Hebrew of the Hebrews," stood alone to breast the current. He Iiad the courage of his convictions, asserted and defended the truth, and won victory from what threatened to be an overwhelming defeat. 14, At this point Paul confronted Peter, as intimated in ver. 11. But when I saw that they walked not uprightly, literally, /calked not straight. They diverged from the straight path, according to the truth of the gospel (ver. 15, le), which made all one in Christ (3 : 28), who broke down tlie middle wall of par- tition between Jew and Gentile (i':p''- ^ : 'O- Before them all; publicly. Peter's influence was public, and it needed to be met publicly. Various views have been held in regard to the limit of this address of Paul. Soiue suppose "it to end with this verse; others, with ver. 15, or 17, or 18; but most, with the end of the chapter. Yet it seems to me that the address is the more directly given as far as the end of ver. 18. The rest of the chapter ap- pears to be a more general account of what he said to Peter, affected in form by his mental reference to the Gala- tians and its application to them. The latter appears to be the most natural view. We need not suppose, however, that we have here the exact words, but rather, the summary of Paul's remon- strance and reproof. Doubtless ques- tions and answers were interspersed, and the substance here given and so molded as to meet the condition and dangers of the Galatians. If thou, being a Jew, by birth and education, livest after the manner of Gen- tiles, having mingled freely and eaten with them ever since your visit to Cor- nelius, and not as do the J[ews, in separating from and not eating with Gentiles, why compellest thou the Gentiles, by your exampleand moral influence, to live as do the Jews, to Jiidahe, to observe the custom of the Jews, to become proselytes to Judaism by circumcision and the observance of the Mosaic law (vtr. is, 21). The ten- dency of Peter's example was to join Judaism to Christianity, to induce Gen- tile believers to be circumcised and keep the law. While he himself would regard this as unnecessary, the zealous Jew would regard these ritual observ- ances as essential to a perfected Chris- tianity. The mere question asked by Paul shows at once the inconsistency of Peter's conduct with his visit to Cor- nelius, his address at the Jerusalem conference, and his hal)itual practice from that time. Here he might have paused. But he proceeds to unfold the great truth of the gospel pertaining to salvation, and to show that the conduct of Peter and the others was not in ac- cordance with the principles and lib- erty of the gospel. 15. This verse and the next are one sentence, in which the apostle refers to the fundamental doctrine of justifica- tion by faith alone, which Peter, as well as he himself, accepted and had verified in their own experience, in 74 GALATIANS [Ch. 11. 15 1 We who are Jews by nature, and not I IG 'sinnersof the Gt-iitiles, » knowing that a man is not just i tied by tlie worlds of I tlie law, but U)y the faith of Jesus j Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by I the faith of Christ, and not by the 1 works of the law : for " by the works of \ the law shall no flesh be justilied. j being Jews by nature, and not sin- 16 ners from among the Gentiles, yet knowing that a man is not justified by works of law, but only through faith in Jesus Christ, even we believed on Christ Jesus, that we might be justified by faith in Christ, and not by works of law ; because by works of law no flesh q Acts 15 . 10, 11. t 3 . 2-.'- r Eph. 2 : 3, 15 Rom. 5:1; Hub. 7 : 18 8 Sec refs. Rom. 1 : 17 ; 3 : 20-22, 28. u Ps. 143 : 2; Rom 3 . 20. accordance with Old Testament Scrip- ture. Notice that Paul courteously changes his address from the second person t/iou to the first person we. The sentence is more subdued than the preceding, and concessive, I concede that we who arc Jews by nature, 1)1/ hirtli, not even proselytes, and not sinners of the Cientiles, as viewed from the Jewish standpoint (the word '•sinner" used, perhaps, with a little irony). Paul incidentally brings to view the popular Jewish idea of Gen- tiles. They looked down upon them as ! sinners; and so these of the Jewi.sh party were treating their (Jentile breth- ren. 10. To l)ring out the connection of thought with the preceding clause, we should translate: Yet knowing that a man is not justified, accounted as righteous, by, literally, out of, the works of the law, as a result of obey- ing perfectly the requirements of the law, but by, better, but ouhj tJirongli, the faith of Jesus Christ ; knowing this to be the case, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith, out of, or, % ineans of faith in Christ, and not by the works of the law: l)ecause, as it is written (p^- i^ii ; 2)^ by, out of, or, hi/ iii((f)i.-i of, the works of the law shall no Hesh be jus- tified. Justification is not to be ob- tained by legal ol)servan<'es, and hence the reason for giving up salvation by works as a ground of merit, and adopt- ing the principle of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. Conip. Rom. 3 : L'lt, where this passage is quoted more fully. The rendering of the Revised version, save through faith, etc., does not correctly repn-sent the original, j since it may imi)ly a jnstilication partly by works and faith, an idea in direct 1 opposition to the statement that iinme- ' diately follows. The meaning evidently is, but only, as in 1:7; Matt. 12 : 4, (So Meyer.) This does not exclude Christ's perfect obedience of the law in our stead (* : 4, 5; Rom. 10 : 4), which is accounted to the penitent believer. The words justify, justification, right- eous, and righteousness, are important terms in Paul's writings. "To justify " is used in a forensic or judicial sense, "to account and pronounce righteous," "to acquit from guilt." "Right- eousness" in Paul's use never means justification, but simply "righteous- ness." "Faith" is the instrument or medium by or through which God jus- tifies the sinner. God in justification acciuits the believing sinner of all guilt on account of Christ's obedience unto death and intercession, and treats him as righteous irrespective of the believ- er's personal merits. Righteousness is accounted, or set to his account. Vet in thus defining justification as a foren- sic act, we must beware lest we isolate it too much from God's gracious work in the soul, with which it is inseparably connected. Regeneration, the impart- ing of eternal life, always attends, in- deed is implied, by the act of justifica- tion. " Whom he called, them he also justified; and whom he jestifietl, them "he also glorified" (i^"'"- » ■ :»f>). God does not declare a sinner righteous and treat him as such, and leave him unre- generate and dead in sins. Compare the di.scussion (see note ou p. 127) in my Commentary on Romans (> : n). Many have found great dilhculty in reconciling Paul's idea of justification with that of James. Paul insists on justification by faith apart from works "of the law ; but James says (2 : 24), " Ye sec that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only." The two, how- ever, use their terms ditferenlly. Paul speaks of works in their relation to the Ch. II.] GALATIAXS 75 17 ^But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister 18 of sin? God forbid. For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make 19 myself a transgressor. For I i- through 17 shall be justified. But if, while seek- ing to be justified in Christ, we our- selves also were found sinners, is then Christ a minister of sin ? Far be it I 18 For if I build up again the things which I pulled down, I show myself a 1, 2; IJohuS 9. y Rom. 8 : 2. holj' law of God ; James, of those works which grow out of faith. Paul is think- ing of faith, which actually extenod. The 'aw thus prepared the way, by cutting olfall hope of righteousness and salva- tion through the works of the law, and shutting him iij) to Christ as his only hop*' for righteousness and salvation through faith. Despairing of all help from the law in the holy living of a new spiritual life, he was driven to seek tin- higher plane of the gospel, and ob- tain eternal life anective callings from God and all stand on a level before him and with one another (ver. 7-9; Matt. 23 : 8-12). 10. In the frankness and open-hearted- ness and readiness to rejoice in the suc- cess of others manifested by Paul, Peter, James, and John, we see how to avoid strife and settle ditUculties among breth- ren (ver. G-9 ; 5 : 25, 26). 11. The exercise of benevolence and be- nelicence is a Christian duty and the out- flow of a true Christian spirit (ver. 10; 2 Cor. 8: 1, 6; 9 : 7-11). 12. The primacy of Peter among the apostles claimed by the Romanists is in- credible in view of his inconsistent con- duct at Antioch and the rebuke of Paul. The failures of Peter, perhaps, are re- corded in part to show to future genera- tions that he was not above the rest of the apostles (ver. 11-13; Matt. 16 : 22, 23; 26 : 75). 13. Learn how to give reproof. Not by whispers to others, nor slanders, but frankly to the person himself, with as little personality as possible, by a plain and clear exposition of the truth (ver. 11 ; 1 Tim. 5 : 1, 2; 2 Tim. 4 : 2). 14. The best of men have their weak- nesses. Barnabas was eminently " a good man" (Acts 11 : 24), but he was influ- enced into dissembling by Judaizers (ver. 13, 14; 1 Cor. 11 : 1). 15. It is a Christian duty to reprove and admonish, at a proper time and in a proper way, those in error ; private faults privately, public ofTenses publicly (ver. 14 ; Matt. 18 : 15 ; 1 Tim. 5 : 19, 20). 16. Beware and not subvert the gospel by laying down conditions for salvation which are not required by the word of God (ver. 14-16 ; Isa. 1 : 12 ; Matt. 15 : 3, 9). 17. There is no middle ground between justification by faith and justification by works. A holy being alone can by per- fect obedience be righteous before God. Sinners, both in their nature and in their practice, find only condemnation from the law (ver. 16; 3 : 10). 18. The tendency of justification by faith is not toward sin, but toward holi- ness and God (ver. IS, 19: Rom. 6 : 1 ff ; 2 Cor. 4 : 1-6). 19. The believer can claim Christ as a personal Saviour. " Wondrous words ! 1 i am so identified with him that his death Ch. III.] GALATIAXS 79 is my death. When he was crucified I was crucified with him. I am so much one with him under law and in sufEering and death that when he died to the law I died to the law"(EADiE). "Because I live, ye shall live also " (John 11 : 19 ; ver. 19, 20; 3 : 13 ; Rom, 7:4.) 20. The blessings acquired by Christ's death belong to the believer— freedom from condemnation, Avorship, eternal life ( ver. 20 ; Rom. 8 : 1, 12-17 ; 1 Cor. 2 : 13, 14). 21. The grace of God lies at the founda- tion of the Christian's hope, but faith unites him to Chrisfs death and life (ver. 21; 2 Cor. 8:9; Rom. 10:4; Phil. 3 : 8-11). 22. Salvation by faith honors God and his grace, but salvation by works impugns his grace and makes impossible spiritual life in the soul (ver. 21 ; 1 John 4 : 9, 10 ; Rom. 8 : 7, 8). CHAPTER III. The last two chapters are personal and defensive ; the next two are doc- trinal and more strictly polemic. Hav- ing proved the independence and divine authority of his apostleship and of the gospel he preached, the apostle proceeds to discuss and illustrate the doctrine of justification by faith. This he had brought into prominence in 2 : 16 ; and the doctrinal statement in 2 : 19-21 forms a connecting link between the last chapter and this, and prepares the way for plunging at once into the doc- trinal discussion. 1-29. Justification not by law, BUT BY FAITH. With the authority of an apostle Paul rel)ukes the Galatians for their inconsistency and folly in for- saking the gospel for the law in order to obtain justification (ver. 1). In con- nection with this he proceeds to estab- lish the doctrine of gratuitous justifica- tion by faith. The first argument is: From their own experience, in reference to their reception of the Spirit and the power of miraculous working, l)oth of which came not by works of the law, but through faith (ver. 2-5). Second ar- gument: From the faith of Abraliam by which he was justified; and in the same way through faith the Scripture is fulfilled. "In thee shall all the na- tions be blessed" (ver. 6-9). Third ar- gument : From the law, which pro- nounces a curse on all that depend on it, and which cannot justify, since " The just shall live by faith" (ver. 10-12). Fourth argument : From what Christ has done, in that he redeemed us from the curse of the law, by submitting to its infliction, in order that the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gen- tiles, and that all might through faith receive the promise of the Spirit (ver. 12- li). Fifth argument: From the fact that God made his covenant Avith Abra- ham before the giving of the Mosaic laAV (ver. 15-18). Sixth argument : From the design of the law, Avhich was a tempo- rary provision, designed to minister to the'fulfillment of the promise, and as a tutor to bring us by faith to Christ (vlt. 19-24), Seventh argument : From what faith has done for us, through which we have received sonship and unity in Christ whom we professed in baptism. Thus in regeneration and in profession we are all one in Christ, without dis- tinction of race and sex, the seed of Abraham and heirs according to prom- ise (ver. 25-29). But the discussion in this chapter and the next may ])e viewed from difierent points. Viewed on the side of love and of the gospel which Paul preached, he maintains to the Galatians the truth of his gospel by an appeal to their own ex- perience of salvation and to the experi- ence of Abraham, and to tlie Old Testa- ment Scriptures, and to the old cove- nant as a covenant of promise in which the law was preparatory to the fulfill- ment of the promise ; and hence he maintains their freedom as sons, and that to return to the law was going back into bondage. Or, viewed on the side of the.se Galatian Judaizers, they Avere antagonistic to the gospel of Christ as experienced by themselves, to the prom- ise given to Abraham, and to the law through [Moses, since the former Avas a promise of the gospel antedating and underlying the law, and the latter Avas disciplinary and preparatory to the gospel. In returning to the laAV they are returning into bondage. Therefore he exhorts tliem to return to the true freedom of the gospel (1 = 12). 1. The concluding Averse of the pre- ceding chapter ends the argument by a reductio ad absurdiim, showing that the doctrine of justification by Avorks of law practically makes the death of Christ superfluous. The thought of the Gala- 80 GALATIANS [Ch. III. Saloation by faith cmd not by law. 3 O FOOLISH Galatians. •' who hath be- witched you, that ye should not obey 'tlie truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, 2 crucified among you? This only would I learn of you, Keceived ye ^ the Spirit by the works of the law, 'or by the 3 hearing of faith? Are ye so foolish? 3 O FOOLISH Galatians, who bewitch- ed you, before whose eyes Jesus Christ 2 was openly set forth as crucified ? This only 1 wish to learn from you : Was it from works of law that ye received the Spirit, or from the hearing of faith? A 1 :6; 5 :7. I 2 : U ; 5 : 7. k Ver. 14 ; Acts 2 : I Rom. 10 : 16, 17. ; 10: 41-46; 19 : 2-6; Eph. 1 : 13, 14. tians accepting so impious a doctrine is intolerable, and Paul breaks forth into a vehement and somewhat pathetic remonstrance. Christ's death in vain ! ; 0 foolish Galatians, sen.seless \ Gauls, without consideration and reflec- j tion, who hath bewitched you, fascinated you as by some charm or sorcery, belore whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently, was openly, set forth, as crucified, grapliically and openly delineated in | preaching and in the ordinances, as crucified for you? {2:20.) He had preached Christ crucified (2:20; 1 Cor. 1 : 2:1), and this involved exclusive de- pendence on Christ for salvation and the abandonment of the law as a means of justification. The words, that ye should not obey the truth, are not found in the best manuscripts, and should be omitted. They are found in 5 : 7, from which they were probablj' inserted here. The words, among you, are also wanting in the oldest and best documents. On foolish compare Luke 24 : 25. The word bervitchcd is found only here in the New Testament, used in al- lusion to the malignant glance of an " evil eye," exercising like a serpent a chnrniing and beguiling power, and im- plies that tlie Galatians had been mis- led "dv wicked iiiHuences, as if by magic or evil arts. The expression, hiforc. whose very eyes . . . openly delineated, suggests not only Paul's preaching Clirist crucified, but also liaptism ( vt-r. 27) and especially the Lord's Supper, in which Christ had \K'Qn phtenrded, -a^M were, in syndjol, the crucified One in our behalf 2. Tile apostle shows the folly of their error by several decisive (picstions aj>- pealing to their experience. This only would I learn of you. This one only thing I desire to ascertain from you, and this alone will reveal your error. Received ye the Spirit, at your conversion and in your Christian lives, either in his ordinary or extraor- dinary operation, by means of works of law, by observing the works which the commands and precepts of the law require, or by means of the hearing (hat comes of faith ; that is, from be- lieving? Of course there could be but one answer. They had received the Spirit by listening with faith. The Spirit is not to be limited here, with some, to his gifts, but should be ex- tended generally to his reception by the Galatians, when they were justified, in regeneration and in the beginnings of their spiritual lives. The word hearing is used of the act of hearing, to perceive by hearing, or it may be used of the thing, the message, the preaching. So aho faith is used of an active belief or trust in Christ; and it may be used of what is heard and believed, the sub- stance of the gospel. The latter u.se is not common in the New Testament. The active sense of faith is usual Avitli Paul. "Faith is not with Paul i)ri- marily a doctrine, but an action, a thing to be done, a trust to be exercised " (G. B. Stp:vens). ;Many take the phrase, "the hearing of faith," to mean the preaching concerning the necessity of faith. To me the active .sense of both words seems more natural and appro- priate— the listening that comes of faith. The contrast is between the two phrases, "works of law" and "the hearing of faith," legal works or obe- dience, and trustful hearing, or, faith through hearing (Rom- 10 : u). The law- says, This do and thou shalt live; the gospel, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved (R*>ni. 10 : 5-9). Ch. III.] GALATIANS 81 •"Having begun in the Spirit, are ye 4 now made perfect by ° the flesh ? » Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if 5 it be yet in vain. He therefore Pthat ministereth to you the Spirit, and work- eth miracles among you, doeth he it by 3 Are ye so foolish? Having begun in the Spirit, are ye now being made per- 4 feet in the flesh ? Did ye suffer so many things in vain? If indeed it be 5 in vain. Does he therefore, who sup- plies to you the Spirit, and works m 4 : 7-10. Heb. 9 : 10. 9-22 ; 2 Joha 8. p 2 Cor. 3 : 8. 3. The idea of their folly grows upon him. Are ye so foolish? so sense- less, and so unreflecting. So is the em- phatic word. The folly and inconsist- ency of the Galatians are indicated by wiiat follows. Having begun in the Spirit, in hearing and believing, are ye now being made perfect by the flesh ? in your natural sinful state in attending to legal observances. Spirit and flesh are here used instrumentally. Nearly equivalent is this to asking, Having begun your Christian life spirit- ually, are ye now completing it, or making it perfect, carnally? The mere asking of the question showed its folly. The "beginning in the Spirit" and " the making of it perfect in the flesh " correspond to " work of law " and " the hearing of faith " of the preceding verse, and indicate the respective character and instrumentality of the gospel and the law. The use of the word flesh, meaning the natural sinful nature, ac- cords with Paul's usage of the word. Many, however, apply J/e^Vi to the out- ward ceremonials of the law, such as circumcision and other rites of Judaism, But this distinction of ceremonial and moral law, and the emphasizing of the ceremonial, is a modern usage. The idea rather is. Are y^e being made per- fect by giving yourselves up to the con- trol of the flesh, your natural sinful na- ture? Instead of being made perfect, some prefer to translate, " Are ye now making an end in the flesh?" This, however, is not so well supported as the other, 4. In verse 2 the apostle had but one uestion to ask them. The questions that follow grow out of that one ques- tion. In view of the folly and useless- ness of attempting to perfect their Christian lives by the flesh, he exclaims or asks : Have ye, rather, Did ye, suf- fered so many things in vain ? at the time of your conversion. We have no account of their sufferings, but doubt- less they suffered per.secution like those in the neighboring region of Pisidia qi tl and Lycaonia (Acts u : 2, 5, 19, 22), and at Ephesus (Acts 19 : 23 fr)j and at Thessa- louica (1 Thess. 1:6), instigated very likely by opposing Jews, Their suffer- ings would, indeed, be for naught, and worse than naught, if they had turned away from Christ, But in the exercise of love which " hopetli all things," he adds, if it be indeed in vain. Paul could not but hope and believe that it would not be in vain. Their faith was worth suffering for, but if they gave up their life of faith, it was a confession that that and all tiieir sufferings on ac- count of it were vain. Some would render, Did ye experience so many things in vain/ Have the blessings of your new life yielded no result, perhaps worse than none? The verb sometimes has this meaning in classical Greek, and the meaning suits the connection here ; but the common meaning, to suffer, is the uniform use of the word in the New Testament and the Septuagint, and is adopted by Meyer, Lightfoot, EUicott, Alford, and others, and upon the whole, is to be preferred, 5. The apostle resumes the question of verse 2 in another form. He had asked it in reference to the time of their conversion ; he now asks it in reference to their experiences since that time. He thus prepares the way for intro- ducing Abraham as an example of justi- fication by faith. He therefore that ministereth to you, or, snpplietli to you, the Spirit, and worketh, now, habitually, miracles among you, or, in you. The word rendered miracles may mean either miraculous tvor/cs, or miraculous powers. If the former, then it should be followed by the rendering among you; but if the latter, then nnthiyi you is to be preferred, referring to the miraculous gifts of the Spirit which they had received from God (i Cor. 12 : 6-11, 28). The New Testament use of the verb worketh favors the latter view (1 Cor. 12 : 11 ; Phil. 2 : 13). The rendering among you, in the midst of you, may, however, include a reference to both 82 GALATIANS [Ch. III. the works of the law, or by the hearing of faitli ? 6 Even as i ' Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for right- 7 eousness ': know ye tlierefore that "• they which are of faith, the same are the 8 children of Abraham. And » the Scrip- ture, foreseeing that God would justify miracles among you, do it from works of law, or fn)m the hearing of faith ? 6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to iiim for righteouisneHS. 7 Know then that they who are of faith, 8 thase are sons of Abraham. And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, an- g See refs. Gen. 15 : 6. r Ver. 26-29 ; John 8 : 39 ; Rom. 1 : 11-16. 3 : 28-30 ; 9 ; miracles of sense, and also of the Spirit, such as speaking of tongues, prophesy- ing, and the like. The sentence may be completed : Doeth he it, does God thus supply and work, by the means, by the works of the law ? or, by means of the hearing that comes of faith f (See ou ver. 2.) The auswer is evident. God had supplied his Spirit and had wrought miracles among them and within them, not through legal works, but through faith in Jesus Clirist. It is implied that such are justified, and that through faith, apart from works of law. 6. The blessings of justification by faith were exemplified in the case of Abraham. The passage quoted is from Gen. 15 : 6, according to the Septua- gint, giving the meaning of the He- brew, which reads, "And he believed the Lord and it was counted to him for righteousness." It was a standard passage of appeal among Jews and Christians, and is quoted also in Rom. 4 : 3 and in James 2 : 23. This verse is closely connected with the preceding verse. The answer to the question is implied : Surely from the hearing of faith, Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted, or, reckoned, to him for righteous- ness. His faith was reckoned to him in place of righteousness, or a perfect life, demanded by God. It was thus accepted by God as a condition of justi- fication. Faith is not meritorious. Its very nature excludes tlie idea of merit and by its humble trust implies grace on God's part (Rom. 4 : 4, 5), Abraham trusted God's Messianic promise. He had before this exercised faith in the word and promi.se of God (jec- tion and proceeds to show the pre- cedence and superiority of the promise to the law. Brethren, indicating his loving heart, though he had felt com- pelled to be severe. He puts himself on a level with them ; he recognizes their spiritual brotherhood, though they were going astray. I speak after the manner of men, as men commonly do in using an illustration from human aftairs. (comp. Rom. 3:5; 6: 19; 1 Cor. 9: 8.) ThoUgh it bC but a man's covenant, even in the case of a human covenant, yet if it be con- firmed, or, ratified, no man, no third party, disanniilleth, sets it aside, or addeth thereto. The apostle statcf a fact in human aftairs which they all knew and must assent to. This he will now apply to the covenant promi.se made to Abraham and to the ^losaic law, which was given hundreds of years after. The word covenant means a solemn compact or agreement. Some would translate it here icill or testament. But while this is its general meaning in classic Greek, it is always used of a covenant in the Septuagint, Ch. III.] GALATIANS 87 Abraham and his seed were the prom- ises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many ; but as of one. And to thy 17 seed, which is s Christ. And this I say, ham were the promises spoken, and to his seed. He says not, and to seeds, as of many; but as of one, and to thy 17 seed, which is Christ. But tliis I say ; g Rom. 9:7,8. influenced by the Hebrew, and in the New Testament it is always used in the sense of covenant, except in Heb. 9 : 16, 17, where it means testament. From this meaning in this latter passage, and from the translation testamentuni by the Latin Vulgate, the rendering "tes- tament" passed into Matt. 26:28; Mark U : 24 ; Luke 22 : 20 ; 1 Cor. 11 : 25 ; 2 Cor. 3 : 6, U ; Heb. 7 : 22 ; 9 : 15, 20 ; Rev. 11 : 19, and to the titles, "The Old" and "The New Testament," in- stead of "The Old" and "The New Covenant." Some translate testament here because of the mention of " the inheritance " in ver. 18. But an inher- itance may belong to a covenant as well as to a testament, and, besides, the heirs of this inheritance do not suc- ceed on the death of its author. 16. An implied tliought or inference to the preceding verse would be : If no one sets aside or adds fresh clauses to a man's covenant when it has been rati- fied, how much more true of a divine covenant such as God made with Abra- ham. Now to Abraham were the promises spoken, orally, not written, and to his seed. The words to his seed are emphatic, which the apostle ex- pounds and connects with Christ. The promises, in the plural, are a general reference to Gen. 13 : 15 ; 17 : 7, 8, and summarizes the teaching of the Scrip- tures on this subject. They were not spoken merelj^ to Abraham, to be ter- minated with his own life, but they looked forward to Christ. The apostle has in mind not the lower and material reference of these promises to the land of Canaan, but their higher and spir- itual application. He saith not, And to seeds, that is, to various kinds of seeds, as of many, ofdiflerent kinds, such as one kind for the promise, another for the law, etc. ; but as of one kind, And to thy ki)id of seed which is Christ, the embodiment and representative of his kind, who is the head of the body. This quotation and application by the apostle to Christ has been much criticised as rab- binical and as if untrue to the fact that both in Hebrew and Greek the word seed is a collective noun, used in the singular of one kind of seed, as, for ex- ample, of wheat, which is one of a class, but including many kernels, aiid in the plural of diti'erent kinds or classes of seeds, as Avheat, barley, rye, etc. But Paul and his readers were not ignorant of this use of the word as a collective noun, for he so uses it in ver. 29 ; Rom. 1 : 3, etc. The form of the argument is doubtless rabbinic, but this does not make the interpretation any the less true. Paul emphasizes the fact that only one kind of seed is spoken of, which applies not to the mere literal descendants of Abraham, but to his spiritual children, concerning whom it could be truly said, " I will be their God" (Geu. 17:8). God indeed prom- ised to Abraham an innumerable pos- terity, but the promises were appro- priated only by believing Abraham, by his believing descendants, and by those of like faith. (Comp. Hom. 4 : ii. 12.) To such, only in the higher and truer sense could these promises be made, and to them they would only be made as they were in Christ, or exercising that faith which really rests upon and unites them to him. That such is Paul's in- terpretation appears from ver. 29, " And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed and heirs according to the prom- ise." Paul, indeed, is viewing the per- sonal Christ, who is the personal Sav- iour of believers in all ages, who is emphatically the seed of the woman (Gen. 3 : 15), the sccoud Adam, yet at the same time he views the representative Christ, who is the head of the one line of his spiritual people, and who are united in him as one body. Still, after all, the essential idea doubtless is : The promises to Abraham and to his seed meet their true ideal fulfillment only in Christ. (See an able discussion of this passage in Dr. Franklin Johnson's "Quotations of the New Testament from the Old," pp. 260-269.) 17. The argument begun in verse 15 is resumed, having been interrupted by the explanation regarding Abraham's 88 GALATIANS [Cm. III. i/iat the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, •■ whicli was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, 'that it should 18 make the promise of none effect. For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise; ''but God gave it to Abraham by promise. I'j Wherefore then serre^/i the law? Ut was added because of transgressions. a covenant before ratified by God, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, to 18 make the promise of no effect. For if the inlieritance is from law, it is no more from promise ; but God has freely given it to Abraliam through promise. 19 What then is the law ? It was added for the sake of the transgressions, un- h Exod. 12 : 40. 41. k Vcr. t Ver. 21 ; see refs. Xuui. 23 : 19 ; Rom. 4 : 13, 14 ; Heb. 6 : 13-18. I John 15 : 22 ; Rom. 7 : 7-13 ; 1 Tim. 1 : 9. seed. And this I say, arguing from human affairs, that no third party can set aside or add new provisions to a covenant between two parties. In Christ should be omitted, according to the oldest and best documents. Trans- late: A coretKott confirmed, or rati- fied before the giving of the law, by God, the law which wasToiir hundred and thirty years after does not dis- annul, it does not invalidate, so as to make the promise, fulfilled in Christ, of none ettect. The covenant was ratified by its repetition to Abraham and by oath (Hcb. e : n, is ; Geu. 12 : a ; 15 : is ; 18:18; 22 : 16). It was repeated also to Isaac and Jacob. The four hundred and thirty years have given much trouble to chronologists, since the Hebrew text as we now have it gives that time for the sojourn of Israel in Egypt. But the Septuagint version, which Paul very generally quotes, in Exod. 12 : 40, reads, " they sojourned in the land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan four hundred and thirty years." This also accords with Josephus and the Samaritan text. Some, however, would harmonize this passage with the current Hebrew text, by regarding the close of the patriarchal age as the starting-point of the apostle's reckoning, since the iiroiuiscs were re- peated to Isaac and Jacob. But Paul's argument does not depend on any pop- ular chronological statement. The idea is that the promise which involved the principle of faitli was hundreds of years l)efore the law, which could not invali- date the solemn covenant i)romise to Abraham and extending onward to Christ. (Comp. uoteon Acts 7 : 6.) 18. The apostle confirms and clinches the argument: For if the inherit- ance, the Messianic blessings of sal- vation, be of the law, or, from the law, if we entertain such a supposi- tion, then we are driven to the conclu- sion, that it is no more of promise, implying grace and faith. The faith- principle and the law-principle are di- rectly opposed to each other, and mu- tually exclusive. (See ou ver. 11.) But, so far from the inheritance in the king- dom of God being dependent on law, God has freely given it to Abraham by, or, through, promise. Thus, as the more exact rendering of the passage brings to view, the inheritance comes as a free and gracious gift, implying faith ; and the perfect tense indicates its permanent and continued condition. On "the inheritance" see Heb. 11 : 8- 10, 13-16. 19. It might well be asked, If the promise is wholly independent of the law and extends far beyond its sphere, if the blessings of salvation came through the covenant-promise to Abra- ham, rather than by the law, what was the design of the law? what good pur- po.se did it accomplish? The answer is given in this and the live follow- ing verses, showing that its whole scope and purpose was preparatory to another and higher object. M herefore then serveth the law? or, ichat then is the laiv, its object and its function? Paul answers by stating in this verse why the law was given, how it was given, and how long as a system it was to continue. It was added, snpciadded, added on to the promise, because of, or,/c;- the sake of, the transgfressions against it. The rendering for the sake of is the primary meaning of the orignal, but it " seems to have lost this force iu actual use subsequently, so as to mean simply because of , on account of "(J. R.BoiSK). But what does Paul mean by " because of" or " for the sake of transgressions " ? Shall we say with Neander, Olshausen, and others, 'that the object of the law is Ch. III.] GALATIAXS 89 till ""the seed should come to whom the promise was made ; and it was » or- dained by augels in the hand ^of a til the seed should come to whom the promise has been made ; having been arranged tiirough angels, by tlie hand Ver. 16. n Acts 7 : 53 ; Heb. 2 ; 2. Exod. 20 ; 19-22 ; Deut. 5 : 5, 22, 27, 31 ; Job 9 : 33 ; Acts 7 : I to check and restrain transgressions? Or with Calvin, EUicott, and others, that it is to give men a clear knowledge of the real character of transgression ? Or with Lightfoot, Meyer, and others, tliat its design is to reveal, provoke, and multiply transgressions? Tliere appear to be elements of truth in all of these. For consider (1) That Paul is now speaking in the conciliatory spirit of a teacher (" Brethren," etc., ver. 15) and WOuld, therefore, satisfy, so far as consistent, the Jewish conscience. He could admit the restraining power of the law, but that does not go far enough, while the bold statement that its object was to increase transgression would only increase the difficulty in the mind of the honest ob- jector. But (2) Paul's chief object was to show the design of the law in its re- lation to the promise and to Christ, as is evident from the discussion that fol- lows. It must have been, therefore, adapted to the condition of the Jewish race and to the spiritual condition of man, and preparatory to the gospel. This would seem to require elements from the second and third view above. And (3) it will help us, "if we reflect on the probable moral condition of the Israelites as they left Egypt, after gen- erations of slavery, debauched as tliey must have been, and with ideas of right and wrong far less distinct than those of their ancestors, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. It was by no means strange that they needed new and clear and au- thoritative instruction on questions of duty" (J. R. Boise). So also (4) the apostle's statement elsewhere on this subject will help us. In Rom. 4 : 15 Paul says, " Where no law is, there is no transgression," true, indeed, of the law written upon the heart, but espe- cially so. of the Mosaic law. In Rom. 3 : 20, he says that " through the law is the knowledge of sin"; and in 1 Cor. 15 : 56, that " the strength of sin is the law," the law becomes the power of sin in revealing God's wrath and dis- pleasure against the transgressions of his requirements. In Rom. 5 : 20, he says that " the law came in by the side " (of sin) " that the trespass" (of Adam) "might abound" in additional tres- passes, showing the necessity and pre- paring the way for the coming Re- deemer"; "but where sin abounded grace did much more abound." And in Rom. 7 : 12, 13, that " the commandment is holy, and just, and good " ; " but sin, that it might be shown to be sin, by working death to me through that wliich is good ; that through the commandment sin might become exceedingly sinful." From a comparison of these considera- tions we infer that the purpose for which the law was given was to define sin and show its real character, putting a restraint upon sin and checking in some measure its grosser indulgences, but moi-e especially to bring out the in- ward evil nature of man in its conflict with the positive enactments of a just and holy God, so as to to produce a deep and vivid consciousness of sin and a de- sire for redemption. Man is in a state of sin. Under the law sin becomes ac- tual transgression. The law was in- deed helpful to the promise in checking idolatry and many evils and in preserv- ing the worship of God till the coming of Christ. But while thus helpful to the pious and true seeker after God, its effect on the unrenewed heart was to reveal and to provoke transgression, to arouse it into activity, a_nd bring it to a point where, in conscious need of a Saviour, it could be seen, felt, and for- saken. (See Neander, " Planting and Training," Am. Ed., pp. 399, 400.) In the second place, the law was a temporary provision. It was added, im- plying its supplementary and second- ary character, till the seed should come, that is, Christ (ver. le), to whom the promise was made, hath been made, implying the continued and abiding character of the promise. The promise was thus not anulled, but the law as a provisional system was to continue only to the coming of Christ, and all that was distinctive in the law was to pass away in the new dispensa- tion. In the third place, its inferior though noble character is intimated. It was ordained, enjoined and deliv- ered, by mea??sc»/ angels in the hand 90 GALATIAXS [Ch. III. 20 mediator. Now a mediator is not a me- diator of one ; but God is one. 21 p Is tlie law tlien ajj^ainst the promises of God ? God forbid ! i For if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily rigliteousuess should 22 have been by the law. But the Scripture hath concluded 'all under sin, 'that 20 of a mediator. Now a mediator is not 21 a mediator.of one : but God is one. Is then the law against the promises of God? Far be it! For if a law had been given which is able to make alive, truly righteousness would have 22 been from law. But the Scripture shut up all under sin, that the promise p .Matt. 5 : 17-20 ; Kom. 3 : 31. g 2 : 21 ; Rom. 3 : 20. s Rom. 4 : 11- See refs. Rom 3 : 9, 19, 23 ; 11 : 32. of a mediator, between God and the j ])eople of Israel, evidently Moses. " The Lord our God made a covenant with us in Horeb . . . I stood between the Lord and you at that time " (D«ut- & = 2, 5). The agency of angels in the giving of the law is not mentioned in Exodus, but is indicated in Deut. 33 : 2 ; Ps. 68 : 17 ; Acts 7 : 53, note ; Heb. 2:2; and was ] held traditionally by the Jews ("Jose- j phus' Antiq.," XV., 5, 3). The agency | of angels, and the greatest of human lawgivers, Moses, as mediator, indica- ted the greatness of the law (Heb. 12 : is- 29), and at the same time indicated its inferiority to the promise which was given directly by God. The law was | given mediately through angels and | Moses ; the promise immediately and ' directly to Abraham and to Christ. This is the opposite thought here. 20, This verse has given interpreters great difficulty, arising from its con- cise, epigrammatic character. It has received more interpretations than any other in tlie New Testament, over three hundred, it is said, in all. Schleier- macher was among the first to suggest the true view. The apostle, in the pre- j ceding verse, has shown that the law j was a temporary provision, and second- ' ary in its character, and now he con- I tinues to indicate its inferiority and the superiority of the promise. A media- j tor is properly one who is a medium j of communication between two parties. ! The word is used here generally, not of any one particular person, but as be- longing to a class. Paul means to say, ! Mediatorsare not employed where there ' is only one side or party. The office of j mediator necessarily supposes two par- ties, as in the case of the law (ver. 19). | God is to be taken as the author of the I promise. He is so presented in ver. 17, I 18, and this is the most natural refer- ence here. There is a distinction, there- | fore, between the law gnen through a I mediator between two parties, and the promise given by one party, God, its author. The verse may be rendered and paraphrased: Ao mediator can be a mediator for one party, but there must be two parties as in case of the law, a contract whose conditions must be ful- filled l)y both parties, which on the side of man was impossible (Rom. 8:3); but God, the author of the promise, is one, the only party to the conditions, and is able to fulfill them. Hence the promise is sure to believers (Hum. i -. le) and su- perior to the law. The transitoriness of the law and permanence of the prom- ise is also implied. The former might be terminated whenever the relations of the parties might require it ; but the latter proceeded from God alone, was absolute and unconditional, and ex- tended to all time. 21. Such being the case, the law and the promise standing on diflerent planes. Is the law then against the promises of God? Is it antago- nistic to the promises? God forbid ! Aivay the very thought of it. For if there had been a law given which could have given life, which is able to make alive, verily righteousness nvuld have been from law, then there would have been an- tagonism between the law and the promises, then spiritual life and right- eousness might be attained on the ground of legal merit, which the prom- ises otter as the free, unmerited gift of God. And it is implied that it is not he, the apostle, but the Judaizers, who are setting the law and the promises at variance. And such an assumption of contrariety is contrary to Scripture (next ver.se). 22. But, so far from the law being able to give life, the Scripture, such passages as Ps. 143 : 2; Dcut. 27 : 26 ; and those quoted in Kom. 3:10-18; hath concluded, shut up, as in a Ch. 111.] GALATIANS 91 the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given 'to them that believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept under "the law, shut up unto the faith 24 which should afterwards be revealed. Wherefore ^ the law was our schoolmas- ter to bring us unto Chri.st, ythat we 25 might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, ^ we are no longer un- by faith in Jesus Christ might be given 23 to those who believe. But before faith came, we were guarded under law, shut 24 up to the faith about to be revealed. So that the law has become our tutor, unto Christ, that we may be justified 25 by faith. But faith having come, we t Mark 16 : 16. m Rom. 7 : 7-9, 24, 25 ; y 2 . 16 ; Acts 13 : 39. X See refs. Rom. 10 : i. zi .1-6. prison; all under sin, holding them there, that the promise, of righteous- ness and eternal life, by faith, by means of faith in, Jesus Christ might be given to them that be- lieve. The doctrine of justification by faith is meant, in which faith is the instrumental and Christ the merito- rious cause. The Scripture, personified as in ver. 8, meaning the Old Testa- ment, shut up all things under sin by showing that all are sinners and under the curse of the law. Afl things, the neuter plural, being used of all men collectively. So Meyer and others. No- tice how the apostle emphasizes faith in implied contrast to "the works" of Judaizing Christians by the two phrases, "by faith" and "to them that believe." 23. Thus far Paul has been showing IVIiy then the laivf its purpose and its relation to the promise. In this verse and the next he answers more strictly, What then the laivf But before faith came, before the coming of this faith, the gospel whose leading charac- teristic is believing. We Jews were kept, or, guarded, under the law (omit the) like disobedient slaves, shut up as in a prison (the same verb rendered "hath concluded" in ver. 22), unto, or, for, the faith which should afterwards be revealed in the gospel. The law is here per- sonified and represented as imprison- ing them until the coming of the de- liverance by the gospel through the exercise of faith. All the law could do was to imprison us, and this, in the divine plan, was preparatory and look- ing to the gospel method of justification by faith (next verse). '24. Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, better, so that the kno has been our tutor, our child-leader and trainer, luUo Christ. We have no word in English which exactly corresponds to the word naLhayoiy'o^ { jiaidagogos), from which comes the English peda- gogue, and here rendered schoolmas- ter. Among the Greeks and Romans the name was applied to educated slaves, to whom was entrusted the duty of supervising the life and mor- als of boys from tender age to man- hood, and the boys were never allowed so much as to step out of the house without them. The reference here is not so much to the pedagogue in an- cient times conducting the boy to scliool as to that of training and disci- plining him for the duties and freedom of manhood. In 1 Cor. 4 : 15 the name suggests the idea of severity, and the father's training and discipline are im- plied as milder in character. So the law by its requirements and restrictions had trained and disciplined Jewish Christians, leading them unto Christ ; it had pronounced the curse of con- demnation upon them and taught them by experience that they were not, and could not be, accepted of God by their works ; it had revealed to them their lost and sinful condition (Rom. '7:"-i2), and leading them to see that their only hope was through faith in Jesus Christ. The law is thus a preparatory trainer and is di.sciplinary Christward, in order that we might, better, may, be justified by faith and brought into the full liberty of son- ship under the gospel (next two verses). The apostle, while showing the intent and mission of the law under the divine plan, brings out clearly the great doc- trine of justification by faith and of true freedom flowing out therefrom. 25. But after that faith is come ; this faith, or this believing, which is characteristic of the gospel (ver. 23) J having come,\ve (Jews) are 02 GALATIANS [Ch. III. •JO der a schoolmaster : for ye "are all the children of God, by faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For bas many of you as have been bap- tized into Christ «have put on Christ. 28 <* There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is ueitlier bond nor free, there is neitiier male nor female : for ye are all ^one in 26 are no longer under a tutor. For ye are all sons of God throut^h faith in Christ 27 Jesus. For all ye who were baptized 28 into Christ, did put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is no male and female ; for ye are all one in Christ Je- a John 1 : 12 ; Rom. 8 : 14-17 ; 1 John 3:1,2. d 5 : 6; Rom. 10 ■ 12 ; 1 Cor. 12 : 13. b Rom. 6:3. c See refs. Rom. 13 ; 14. e John 11 : 52 ; 17 : 20, 21 ; Eph. 2 : 13-22. no longer under a schoolmaster, a tutor, or child-trainer. The law has answered its purpose in preparing us for justification by faith in the gospel. In believing, we have come forth from its tutorial training and discipline into the freedom of the gospel. Why and how is told us in the ne.xt verse. 26. From this to the end of the chap- ter Paul dwells upon the sonship and oneness of l)elievers in Christ. Notice that he changes from the first person, 7ve, to the second person, ye. He had associated himself with them in his argument, but now in his application ln' tniphasizes their personal relation to God through faith in Christ. So also with the Jew he had used the first pei'- son, and now with both Jew and Gen- tile he u.ses the second person. You are no longer under a tutor a.iu\ children under age, For ye are all, Jews and Gentiles, the children, rather, the sons, of God by faith in Christ Je- sus. (Comp. John 1 : 12 ; Rom. 8 : 14, 15. ) The emphatic words are sons and all. Under the law is bondage, and the fact that they were sons was a proof of their free- dom, no longer as children under the tutelage of the law. The root and ground of their sonship are in Christ, but in- strumentally through believing (Kph. 1:13). Faith is brought prominently to view in implied contrast to the works of the law. 27. The apostle confirms, by their baptism, the statement that all be- lievers are sons of God. He had just said that "all ye are the sons of God through faith," a faith professed in baptism; For as many of you (equivalent to For all of you) as have been, rather, who urre, bap- tized into Christ, professing thereby your faith in him, have, rather, did, put on Christ at your baptism, you did, in that very act, clothe yourselves publicly, as it were, with Clirist ; you professed your.selves Christians, united I to Christ. Their baptism implied the i exercise of faith, and their being clothed with Christ implied and represente5" new birth" (G. B. Stevens). The new birth, however, is implied, in the wit- nessing presence of the Spirit. And &uii\\y, through God, in his Triune na- ture as related to human redemption, the Father sending the Son and the Spirit, the Son redeeming you from under the law, and the Spirit efiecting and witnessing the work of sonship in you. In regard to inheritance, Roman iaw gave to all the children equally, but Jewish law gave to the sons un- equally, and excluded the daughters excei)t in defiiult of male heirs. As far, therefore, as Paul had in view any form of law, his illustration would most naturally accord with Roman law, which was al.so most familiar to his Ga- la tian readers. 8-20. Appeals to them not to return to legal bondage, but to BKCO.MEFREE FROM JUHAISM. Paul anxiously appeals to the Gentile Gala- tinn believers against the inconsistency and danger of putting themselves un- der legal bondage (vcr. s-u) ; entreats them to become as he, free from Juda- ism (ver. 12) ; reminds them ofhis fomier afi'cction for them as their teacher (ver. 13-15) ; assures them that he is not their enemy for telling them the truth (ver. 16) ; warns them against the Judaizing troublers (ver. n, is); and tenderly ad- dresses them as his spiritual children (ver. 19, 20). 8. Howbeit then. But at that time, in your unconverted state of servitude (ver. 7), when ye knew not God, did not perceive and have knowledge of God, hut were ignorant of him, and because of this want of knowledge, ye did service, bond-service, ye were in bondage, unto them which by na- ture are no gods, better, are not gods in reality. This rendering is ac- cording to the most approved text. Whether the apostle implies that these gods v^-ere demons (i Cor. lo : 20), asileyer suggests, or that they were pure fiction, "so-called gods" (1 Cor. s : 4, 5), is not clearly determined by the language it- self. Paul expresses a pure negative, but it seems to me, without intending to suggest anytliing on either side of the question. We may infer from this passage that the Galatian converts were largely Gentiles and had been idolaters. (Comp. 1 Thess. 4:5.) There cau be no true knowledge of God without spiritual perception and love for him, and they were lacking in both. They might have known more of him, but " they did not like to retain God in their knowledge " (Kom. 1 : 28). 9. But now, in your present con- dition of ado])tion and sonship, after that ye have known God, have come to k)iow him experimentally, or rather are known of God, having been k)ion'n by him, tor God knows us savingly before we know him (Kom. 8 .- 29), how is it (an exclamation of sur- prise and sorrowful indignation) that ye turn back again to the weak (powerless to save) and beggarly elements, better, poor rudimoits, powerless to impart true, durable Ch. IV.] GALATIANS 99 10 desire again to be in bondage? ^Ye I 10 age again? Ye are carefully observing observe days, and months, and times, I days, and months, and seasons, and 11 and years. " I am afraid of you, j lest I I 11 years. I am afraid of you, lest by any have bestowed upon you labour in vain. | means I have toiled over you in vain.* X See refs. Col. 2 : 16, 17. y 5 : 2, 4; 1 Thess. 3 : 5. riches, whereuiito ye desire again {over again) to be in bondage ? — to begin bondage anew in the form of Judaism. The knowledge of God in tliis verse is an advance on the knowledge of him in the preceding verse. There it is knowledge which comes intuitively and by reflection, the possession of a knowledge of God as a being; here a knowledge of him as at- tained by observation or an experience. The former is really the basis of the lat- ter. That involves a niental insight, this a spiritual process. This is a sav- ing knowledge ; that is not, but which, through the grace and Spirit of God, might become so. In speaking of the Galatians, that they have come to know God, Paul guards against laying too much stress on the human side, by stat- ing the divine side, rather having been known by God, by his calling, justifi- cation, and adoption. Their knowledge of him grows out of his knowledge of them. Notice how the apostle classes the rites of Judaism and dependence on them for salvation with the rites and observances of heathenism. Both were a bondage in that they brought con- demnation, and could not save. These Gentile converts had found this true of the worship of idols, and now they were turning to the rites and observ- ances of the law, which were indeed less rudimental, but equally as power- less in conferring the rich blessings of sonship which come alone through faith in Jesus Christ. Heathen systems and the Mosaic system are put together, as those that cannot justify the sinner and confer adoj)tion and sonship, but in origin and character Paul elsewhere teaches that the latter is vastly superior to the former (Rom. 3 : 2, etc. ). The last again literally is, over again, or agai7i aneiv. How is it that ye desire to go back again to these rudiments and be in bondage over again f "They had been slaves to the rudiments in the form of heathenism ; now they were desiring to enslave themselves again in the rudiments, and to commence them aneivin the form of Judaism" (Elli- COTT). 10. The proof of the statement just made against the Galatians. Many punctuate this verse as an interroga- tive sentence, others as a declarative. The sense in either case is substantially the same. The hitter is to be pre- ferred as better suiting the transition to the next verse. Ve observe, care- fully and scrupulously after the man- ner of the Jews, days, such as festivals and weekly Sabbaths, and months, the new moons on the first day of every month (Num. io:io; 28:11), and po.ssibly the seventh month as having a sacred character (Lev. 23 : 21 ff., Meyer) ^ and times, or seasons, such as the an- nual festivals, the Passover, Pentecost, and feast of Tabernacles, and years, every seventh year and every fiftieth year, as jubilee (Lev. 25 : 2-17) ; but some maintain that these la.st had fallen into disuse. This enumeration is probably general and representative, which need not be pressed closely. There Avas evi- dently a turning to Judaistic cere- monies and ritual observances among the Galatians, and the tendency was to Judaize Christianity, (comp. "^Coi. 2 : 16, 17.) There is no ground for suppos- ing that Paul embraced the Lord's Day in this category, which was a Chris- tian, not a Jewish observance. "In regard to these observances, so far as their merits were concerned, the apos- tle's position was conciliatory and his spirit that of concession ( Rom. u : 5, 6 ; 1 Cor. 2 16) ; but in the present situation, a principle was at stake and must not be compromised. He is opposed to all par- ticipation in these Jewish observances because they were regarded as necessary to salvation ; they thus threaten the sole sufficiency of faith" (G. B. Stev- ens). A similar attitude he held to- ward circumcision (2:3; 6 : 15; Acts 16 : 3 ; 1 Cor. 9 : 20). 11. I am afraid of you, appre- hensive, and anxiously solicitous about you, lest I have actually bestowed upon you labour in vain, toiled 100 GALATIAXS [Ch. IV. 12 Brethren, I beseech you, be as I am; » for I am as ye arc. Ye have not injured 13 me at all. Ye know how » through in- firmity of the flesh 1 preached the gos- 14 pel uiito you at the fii-st : and my temp- 12 Become as I am, because I also have become as ye are, brethren, I beseech 13 you. Ye did me no wrong. Nay, ye linow that because of an infirmity of the flesh 1 preached the gospel to "you 1 Cor. 9 : 20-22. a I Cor. 2 : 3 ; 2 Cor. 12 : 7, 9. among you without saving results. This sad picture of their condition rises be- fore him as if it were really the case. We fiud similar expressions of anxiety in the writings of Paul (i Tiiess. 3:5; Phil. 2:16: 2 Cor 6:1). " ThcSC WOrds breathe the tears of Paul" (Luther). Similar trials have atHicted the faith- ful servants of God. So it was of Elijah (1 Kings 19 : 10) aiul of Isaiah (Isa. 53 : l) and of Jeremiah (J^r. 20 : 7). Judaism and heathenism. In these verses Paul recognizes a tutelage and elementary truth in both Judaism and heathenism. And throughout the discussion he recognizes law not only in its highest form in Judaism, but also elsewhere so far as it embodied the same great moral principles. God had spoken to men before he spoke to Moses and Abraham, and certain great truths and traditions were incorporated in the history of the race and these were con- stantly reinforced by God's revelations of himself in nature, providence, and the consciences of men (-^cis u : i7; 17 : 23, 27, 28: Rom. 1 : 19. 20). Paul, therefore, saw that a certain rudimentary training had been going on among Gentiles, as well as the more positive and effective one among Jews. He saw also that the scrupulous ol)servance of rites for obtaining salvation among Jews was of the .same nature and kind as like cere- monies among Gentiles. The lower truths and rites of the latter found something in common with the higher truths and rites of the former. In thus comparing Judaism and heathenism it is better not to separate the law into the moral and the ceremonial, as Light- foot does, whicli is not a scriptural dis- tinction. It is better to look upon both systems each as a whole, antl to note ' that while one was vastly superior to '. the other, yet there were certain simi- lar truths and observances common to both. It was, indeed, a perversion of Judaism to depend on these as aground : of merit and in order to justification; j but in so doing there was a sinking of them beside the poor and beggarly rudi- ments of heathenism. 12, After expressions of severity and solicitude the apostle gives utterance to an earnest and affectionate appeal. Brethren, I beseech you, woids of tender entreaty. In the original they are at the end, instead of at the be- ginning of the sentence, thus emphati- cally enforcing the appeal which al- ready had been made. Be as I am ; for I am as ye are, rather, Become as I am, free from Judaism, jfor I be- came as you, when I was among you. I discarded the distinctions of race'and gave up customs and associations wliich had been dear to me, and became as a Gentile among you for your sakes. I appeal to you on the ground of our for- mer friendly relations. When I was with you, ye injured me not at all, more exactly, ye injured me in nothing. While I thus gave up much on your account and became like one of you, you on your part treated me not wrongly. Your conduct deserves the highest praise, as I shall proceed to show. How he became as they were is described bv the apostle himself iu 1 Cor. 9 : 20-23. 13. This verse in the original begins with But, and is slightly adversative. Its meaning is well brought out in the Improved version, iVay, ye know, etc. So far from your doing me any wrong, Ye know how through inHrniity, a weakness, of the flesh I preached the gospel unto you at the tirst time, at my first vi.sit among you. This implies a second visit, before the writ- ing of this letter. The first appears to have been at the founding of the church, probably during his second missionary journey ( '^'^^•s i*"' ^ •') ; the second visit was probably during his third mission- ary journey (Acts 18 : 23), perhaps a year or more before the writing of this Epis- tle (1:6). The most natural meaning, and the one which suits the connection the best, is, that on account of sickness Paul was providentially detained while Ch. IV.] GALATIANS 101 tation which was in my flesh ye de- spised not, nor rejected ; but received me '^as an angel of God, "even as Christ 15 Jesus. Where is tlien the blessedness ye spake of? For I bear you record, that if it had been possible, ye would have plucked out your own eyes, and 16 have given them to me. Am I there- 14 the first time ; and your trial in my flesli, ye despised not nor spurned, but received me as an angel of God, as 15 Christ Jesus. Where then is that hap- piness of which ye spoke? For I testify for you, that if it had been possible, ye would have plucked out your eyes, and 16 given them to me. So tlien, have I be- 2 Sam. 19 : 27 ; Mai. 2 : 7. c See refs. Matt. 10 : 40. making an itinerating visit through Galatia the iirst time, and that he used the opportunity thus afforded him in preaching the gospel to them, and that he was treated with great kindness on their part. This infirmity has very generally been regarded as "a thorn in the flesh " mentioned in 2 Cor. 12 : 7. It has been variously supposed to be (1) some bodily disease, (2) persecution, (3) fleshly desires, (4) temptations and blasphemous suggestions by the devil. The first view is the probable one, since it was some weakness of the flesh, which was a trial to the Galatians (next verse), and like "a thorn," painful, irritating, and humbling to him. Its acute attacks seem to have been peri- odic. One of them, perhaps the first, was experienced at his first visit to Galatia. Lightfoot conjectures that it " was of the nature of epilepsy," simi- lar to a malady with which Alfred the Great was afflicted all his life. But the more common and the more probable supposition is, that it was .'^ome chronic weakness or disease of the eyes, which, from exposure, occasionally assumed an acute form. (see ou ver. 15; 6 : 11 ; 2 Cor. 12 : 7.) This reference to his sick- ness among them showed his gratitude, and was adaj^ted to arouse in them cor- respondingly kind feelings and prepare them for a favorable reception of his exhortation. 14. And my temptation, trial, which was in my flesh, referring to his bodily infirmity. But the most approved text, supported by the best manuscripts, has your trial instead of my trial. Render : A nd that ivhich ivas a trial to you, ye despised not, nor rejected, loathed, or spurned. Paul uses strong language in regard to the trial his disease gave them, and also in regard to their welcome and devotion to him. In both cases he speaks of how it appeared to him, from his point of view. His sickness was of such a nature that he felt it was a trial of patience and of faith on the part of the Galatians and perhaps offensive to those attending him. His bodily pres- ence he regarded as inferior (2 Cor. 10 : 10), and when this bodily ailment was added, he felt that they had a great temptation to despise and spurn his disease and to treat him as a teacher unworthy of their acceptance. But so far from that, ye bore the test which my complaint put upon you, and ye received me as an angel of God, as Christ Jesus. Thus our Lord's words were fulfilled in them, " He that receiveth you receiveth me" (Matt. 10 : *o). They had received him as a true teacher from God with reverence and the glad tidings concerning Jesus Christ with confidence and joy. (comp. 1 Sam. 29 : 9 ; 2 Sam. U : 17.) They gladly welcomed his teaching and there was great joy among them (Acts 8:8). 15. Where is then the blessed- ness, rather, the happiness, ye spake of at that time? The word "blessed- ness" occurs only here and in Rom. 4 : 6, 9 in the Xew Testament, and means, a declaration of hajJjiiness. The most natural meaning is, Where is the hap- piness you professed to have at my presence among you and in your expe- rience in hearing and receiving the gospel from me ? Some, following a different Greek text, render. What then tvas the happiness, of what nature then ioere your declarations of happiness be- cause of my ministrj% etc.? But the former reading is the better, supported by manuscript authority. For these declarations were so emi)hatic, I bear you record, that, if it had been possible, ye would have plucked out, or, dug out, your own eyes (omit "own"), and given them to me. Thus strongly does Paul express their sti-ong exhibitions and expressions of love to him, which was ready for any sacrifice. Perhaps Paul may use a pro- 102 GALATIANS [Ch. IV. fore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth ? 17 They <* zealously affect you, but not well ; yen, they would exckide you [or, 18 us], that ye m'iglit allect them.' But ^it jsgood to' be zealously atTected always in a good thhig, and not only when I 19 am present with you. ^ily little chil- come your enemy, because I tell you the 17 truth ? They zealously seek you in no good way ; nay, they wish to shut you out, that ye may zealously seek th'em. 18 But it is good to be zealously sought in a good matter always, and not only 19 when I am present with you. My little d Rom. 10 : 2. 1 Cor. 15 : 58. /I Cor. 4 : 15; Philemon 10. verbial expression. (Comp. Ps. n : 8; Prov. 7:2: zech. 2:8.) So sonie thiuk. But many suppose that he speaks in allu- sion to some disease of the eyes, as acute ophthalmia, from which lie was sufler- ing. And even if his language was proverbial, it would have been the more pertinent if he had really thus suffered. Where now is that happiness, that con- fidence, that love, and devotion in and for me and the gospel ? Has it so soon fled? Why such a change of feeling toward me? In these high, impulsive, and changing feelings we see the en- thusiastic and fickle characteristics of the Gallic race. IG. The former question was one of sadness, as the apostle contrasted their former ardent love and devotion with their present feelings of coolness and opposition. This question is of still deeper sorrow. Am I, therefore, better, so then am I, become your enemy (in your view), hostile to you, a personal enemy, because I tell you the truth ? The phrase in the original may have a past reference, by telling yoit the tnith, when I was with you. But he preached the same gospel now as tlien, and the i)resent, because I tell you the truth, is applicable alike to the past and present. But when did he seem to become their enemy? Not on reading this Epistle, for that was in the future, and Paul did not know what its effect would be ; nor on his first visit, for then it was that he en- joyed their ardent love; but upon his second visit, not long after his reproof of Peter, recorded in 2: 11-21, when Judaism had doubtless l>egun to appear among the Galatians. 17. From tliis view of disaffection which was present to the apostle's mind, he passes suddenly to those .lu- daizing ;igitators and instigators of this wrong. They, the .hulaizing teachers, zealously affect you, rather, seek to win yoit over to their side, not ivell, not in a good and honorable way, but in a party spirit. Yea, they would exclude you, shut you out from others, from me and teachers who are not of their way of thinking, in order that ye might affect them, that ye may zealously seek them. In this they exhibit their dishonorable zeal. Lightfoot renders. They pay court to you . . . -1)1 order that you may pay court to them. There may be some ref- erence to these Judaizing teachers at- tempting to induce the Galatian con- verts to renounce formally all ad- herence to Paul. 18. But it is not the zealous seeking- after to which Paul objects, — that is good and commendable in itself, — but to the dishonorable manner of doing it. But, I allow, it is good to be zeal- ously so (^^/i^o/?^?', always in a good thing, matter or cause, and not only when I am present with you. It is good at all times, not only when I am present, but also when I am al)Sent, to be objects of zealous attention from any one, provided it is done in a right way and in a right spirit. Some would render according to our Common ver- sion. But it is good to be zealously affected, or, Jilled ivith zeal in a good thing altcays, etc. But it is l)etter to understand the verb in the same sense as in the preceding verse, to be zeal- ously sought after. This is the thought that fills the apostle's mind, and it pre- pares the way for exercising it toward the Galatians in the tender and earnest appeal that follows. SoEllicott: "But it is good to be courted in honesty at all times, and not only when I am present with you." So i*aul had acted towaril the Corinthians, "with a godly jealousy" (2 Cor. 11 : 2). So he had acted toward the Galatians, and would have all others so act toward them, and so he would continue to do. 19. The apostle's heart is full of anx- iety and sorrow. His emotions burst Ch. IV.] GALATIANS 103 dren, eof whom I travail in birth again 20 until Christ be formed in you, I desire to be present with you now, and to change my voice ; for 1 stand in doubt of you. 21 Tell me, •'ye that desire to be under 22 the law, do ye not hear the law? For it is written, that Abraham had two sons; ithe one by a bondmaid, ''the 23 other by a freewoman : but he u-ho trai< ] children, of whom I travail again in ' birth, until Christ be formed in you! 20 And I could wish to be present with j you now, and to change my voice ; be- cause I am perplexed about you. j 21 Tell me, ye who wish to be under the I 22 law, do ye not hear the law? For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, one by the bondwoman, and one by 1 23 the freewoman. But the one by the g Col. 1 : 27-29 ; 2 : 1. h Ver. 9. Gen. 2-4, 15. A; Gen. 21 : 1, 2. forth in an exclamation of agonizing travail of soul. My little children, for whom I travail in birth again, suffer again a mother's anguish, un- til Christ be fully formed icithin you ! How the tears must have flooded his eyes as these words were written ! His travail of soul is like that which he experienced at their conversion. In so far as they had turned to the law they had turned away from Christ (5 : 4). He tenderly regards them still as children, and little children, in their spiritual weakness and diminutive growth. He looks upon them as regen- erated, but they had so far fallen away as to need a re-conversion, a turning again to the Lord. As God's instru- ment in this work of bringing them back he is in anguish until in mind and life they be brought into complete harmony with the mind and life of Christ. Instead of "little children," many manuscripts read simply "chil- dren." Paul nowhere else employs the phrase, but it is common to John, Some transcriber may have regarded " little" Johannine, and "children" Pauline, and so corrected it. But this tender and affectionate appellation is very appropriate here, and so the ma- jority of scholars retain "little chil- dren " in the text. It is not enough to have our converts believe, we would have Christ formed within them. This will prevent backsliding. 20. Paul had spoken of his presence with them in ver. 18, to which his mind recurs, and he adds : And I could ivish, if it were possilde, to be present with you now, and to change my voice, from severity into gentleness, and adapt ray speech to your exact con- dition. And for this reason : for I stand in doubt of you, rather, be- cause I am perplexed about you. His perplexity had its ground in their state of mind, or rather was produced by their spiritual condition. He knew not how to deal with them, or just how to address them. If he were only present with them he would understand their exact condition better, and, like a loving parent, win them back to Christ. 21-31. CONXM.UDES THE ARGUMENT BY AN ALLEGORY IN WHICH HaGAR AND Sarah are made to illus- trate AND TYPIFY THE LAW AND GOSPEL. Tlie history of the two sons of Abraham indicate the contrast be- tween the bondage of the law and the liberty of the gospel. This mode of argument was familiar and acceptable to those he addressed. 21. Paul vividly addresses the Ga- latians as if they were present before him. Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, the Mosaic law. He is addressing those who were in- clined to follow the Judaizing teachers, and make legal observances as well as I faith in Christ the ground of acceptance with God. Do ye not hear the law, as it is read in your meetings and do you not perceive its teachings? (Luke 4 : 16; Acts 15 : 21.) Paul mectS his adversaries with their own weapons. Law in the last clause is used in the wider sense of the Pentateuch, in which was the account of Sarah and Hagar. Paul adopts the common Jewish divi- sions of the Old Testament Scriptures, the Law (the Pentateuch), the Prophets, the Psalms, or the rest of the Sacred Writings. 22. The preceding question antici- pated an affirmative answer. You cer- tainly have heard what the law says on ' this point. For it is written, recorded in Scripture, without quoting any sin- gle passage, Abraham had t\vo sons, one by the bondwoman arid the other by /Ae freewoman. The bond- age and freedom of the mothers are con- 104 GALATIANS [Ch. IV. of the bondwoman " was born after the flesh ; «> but he of the freewoinan was 24 by promise. Wliich tilings are an alle- gory : for these are » tlie two covenants. The one from the mount p Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar: bondwoman was born after the flesh, and the one by the freewoman through 24 promise. Wliich things are an alle- gory. For these women are two cove- nants, one from mount Sinai, bearing 25 children into bondage, which is Ha- ro Rom. 9 . 7, 8. n Gen. 17 ; lS-19 , Heb. 11 : 11. o3 : 15-21. p Ueut. 33 . 2. trasted in this verse, as are those of the | sons in the next ver.se. (See ceu. le, 21.) i 'Z'.i. But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh, in a perfectly natural way, not uiulcr divine direction, and with noth- ing contrary to tiie ordinary course of nature. Sarah had l)econie impatient bocau.se of tlie delay of God's promise tliat in Abraham's seed all nations 1 should be blessed, and she gave Hagar I as a concubine to her husband, which resulted in tlie birth of Ishmael. But he of the freewoman was by, or, through, promise, thirteen years later, in fulfillment of God's promise, con- trary to the ordinary course of nature. (Comp. Roiu. 4 : l'J-21. ) 24. Which things, connected with the narrativeofthe.se two sons, are an allegory, they represent under an- other form great spiritual facts and principles; tiie one, the bondage and carnal element of the law-system ; the other, the freedom and the spiritual element and life of the gospel-system. An allegory is that kind of illustration which has an aptly suggestive likeness to other more excellent things which it represents. It differs from the parable, in that the latter compares one thing with another, each kept separate and standing side by side; but in the allegory the two are more or less united and mingled together, the j one being invested with the attributes \ and powers of the other. ThusBunyan's ; "Pilgrim" is invested with the at- j tributes and ])owers of the Christian, and the signification is mingled with | the narrative. Thus the expre.s.sion, " I am the true vine" (John 15 : i-s)^ is an allegory, but "The kingdom of lieaven is like a grain of mustard " (Mn.i. 13 : 31. 32), is a parable. An alle- gory is not necessarily fictitious. Here Paul evidently sjH-aks of certain histori- cal facts in Al)raliain's history as hav- ing an allegorical meaning. So also an allegory may simply represent, or il- lustrate ; or it may typify or symbolize. Compare the allegories in Ps. 80 : 8-16 ; John 10: 1-10; 1.5 : 1-8; Heb. 7 : 1-10. For, to explain, these ivomen are, they represent or signify, two cove- nants ; the one from mount Sinai, (omit "the") which gendereth, beareth children n)ito, bondage, which is Agar, Hagar, typified by her. As the slave Hagar bore children into bondage, so the children of the Sinai covenant, a dispensation of law, are in a state of bondage. The former aptly represents and typifies the latter. This is further explained in the next ver.^e. Paul appears to intimate that in ad- dition to the historical meaning of the narrative there was an allegorical meaning. Not that it was in the mind of the writer, but that it was in the divine mind and purpose in these events and in their narration. This seems to be more accordant with the language of this verse, than the view that Paul simply allegorized and applied this Old Testament himself Tiie form of thought is rabbinic and it accorded with Jewish modes of teaching ; but it is carefully put, and in such a way as that it need not ofiend the taste of de- vout scholarship of any age. It has a natural setting and it is here used not so much to prove, as to confirm and illustrate great principles which he had already proved. Dr. G. B. Stevens very aptly says: "Two points should be remembered: (1) How sparingly and temperately Paul uses the allegorical methotl, a remarkable fact when his strict Pharisaic training is considered ; and (2) that there is no ease in which he uses the allegorical form of argu- ment, where, if the form were dropped, a forcible and a valid argument could not still be derived and developed fnun the relations which the allegory con- templates." Paul merely argues alle- gorieally certain truths that he argues logically in Rom. 9 : 6-10. Compare 3 : 16; 1 Cor. 9 : 9, 10; 2 Cor. 3 : 13, 14, where a temperate use of allegorical interpretation appears. Ch. IV.] GALATIAXS 105 25 for this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, aud is in bondage with her children. 26 But 1 Jerusalem which is above is Iree, 27 which is tlie mother of us all. For it gar (for the word Hagar is mount Sinai in Arabia), and answers to the Jeru- salem that now is, for she is in bondage 26 with her children. But the Jerusalem that is above is free, which is our 27 mother. For it is written : 3 Heb. 12 : 22 ; Rev. 12; 21 : 2, 10. 25. For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia. This is a difficult passage, both on account of diiierent readings of the text and of ditferent in- terpretations. According to the mar- ginal reading of the Revised version many ancient authorities omit Hagar and read, For Sinai is a mountain in Arabia. This makes the explanation easy and appropriate : The Sinai cove- nant is fitly represented by Hagar, for Sinai is in Arabia, among the Ara- bians, the descendants of Hagar. But the ditFerences in the reading of the text seem to have arisen because of tlie difficulty of the passage. And such an easy interpretation might have led some early transcribers to adopt the shorter reading. But the longer reading is sustained by a larger numljer of the best manuscripts and authorities. It is favored both by external and internal evidence. It seems best, therefore, to follow it. This verse and the preceding should be closelj^ united, and not sep- arated by a period. Hence the Bible Union version correctly translates : Which is Hagar (for the word Hagar is mount Sinai in Arabia), and answers to Jerusalem which now is, for she is in bondage with her children. Paul con- firms the use he makes of Hagar on geographical and etymological grounds: The word Hagar, meaning a rock, is a name used to designate Mount Sinai in Arabia, the home of the descendants of Hagar. Paul may have learned of this local name of Sinai among the Arabs in his visit to Arabia, after his conversion (1 : !■?). Chrysostom and some otliers refer to this use of the name. The rocky character of Mount Sinai makes this application especially appropriate. The apostle merely notes this remark- able coincidence, as does the writer of Heb. 7 : 2 the names of Melchisedec and Salem, with their respective mean- ings, without especially grounding an argument upon it. The preceding clause is parenthetical. Paul goes on to say that Hagar an- swereth, literally, stayids in the same row, corresponds witli, is of the same nature and chiss, with the Jerusalem which now is, tlie present earthly Jerusalem, for she, Jerusalem, is in bondage with her children, the Jewish people. Jerusalem was the cen- ter of Judaism, and those connected with that system were in bondage un- der the law. The reading/or (above ) in- stead of and , is accord i ng to the best au- thorities, and the natural sulyect of the verb is the " present Jerusalem." The last clause explains how Hagar corre- sponds to Jerusalem, both being in bondage. 26. But, in contrast to the present earthly Jerusalem, the Mosaic law- system, the Jerusalem which is above, the heavenly, spiritual Jerusa- lem, answering to the gospel system, is free, which is the mother of us all, rather, according to the best text, a)id she is our mother, that is, of believers, securing to them freedom in Christ, whether Jews or Gentiles. Lightfoot notices that the apostle here uses in the original the Hebrew form of Jerusalem for the typical city, while elsewhere in this Epistle he employs the Gmecised form for the actual city. The Jews expected that the heavenly Je- rusalem would descend to earth upon the establishment of the Messianic kingdom, and become its capital, ^lost naturally, therefore, the Jerusa- lem above would convey to them the idea of Christ's kingdom : " I savr the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven" (Rev. 21 : 2) ; " Ye are come unto mount Zion, and unto the I city of the living God, the lieavenly Je- rusalem " (Heb. 12 : 22), aiul " For our citizenship is in heaven" (p'"' 3 : 20). [ Believers are of" the household of God" I (Eph. 2 : 19)^ and bear the relation ex- I pressed according to a familiar Hebrew [ idiom, of mother and children (isa. 52 : 2;jer. 6:2). The Jerusalem above is about equivalent to "the kingdom of heaven " in the Gospels. 106 GALATIANS [Ch. IV. is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not ; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate Jiaih many more children than she which liath an husband. 28 Now we. brethren, as Isaac was, are 2y '•the ehiklren of promise. But as then, • he tliat was born after the flesh pei-se- cuted him that was born after the Spirit, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; Break forth and cry, thou that tra- vailest not : Because many are the children of the desolate, rather than of her who has the husband. 28 But ye, brethren, after the manner of 29 Isaac, are children of promise. But as then, the one born after the flesh perse- cuted the one born after the spirit, so 3 : 29; Aots 8 : 25 ; Rom. 9 . 8. < Gen. 21 : 9. 27. In confirmation of the preceding statement that the free Jerusalem is our mother, Paul quotes the Septua- ^Mn^ version of Isa. 54 : 1, a passage which was generally regarded as ^les- sianio. For it is written, Rejoice, tlioii barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not, meaning Jerusalem in desolation during the exile, prefig- ured I)ySarali, who once was childless; for the desolate hath many more children than she Avhich hath an husband, better f/ie hu.shand, pointing to tiie earthy Jerusalem and the Jewisli state in prosperity, to which God was as a liusband (Jer. si .- S2), and prefigured by Ilagar, to whom Ahra- Iiani was as a husband for a time. The last clause more exactly translated, as in the Bible Union version is: Because many are the children of the desolate rather than of her who has the husband, following the Hebrew idiom which has no comparative. Both have many children, but the many of the solitary one are more numerous than those who liad the husband. With his spiritual insight, the apostle perceives the ful- fillment of this prophecy in believers who are children of the heavenly Jeru- salem. " The felicity to be expected in tlie Messial)'s kingdom, and the vast extent of that kingdom, increasing by manifold accessions of converted Gen- tiles as well as Jews, are tlioughts which he (the prophet) has in view. These he describes under the figure of a woman wlio had been repudiated by licr husband, and again received into favor, and who unexpectedly finds licr- .self the happv mother of numerous oflf- ! si)ring"(S. II. Tuhxkk). Tliis may i be regarded as a tyj>ical prophecy having its primary fulfillment in the , deliverance of the Jews from exile and i oppression, but its fuller fulfillment in the increase of Christ's kingdom. (See note ou Matt. 1 : 23. ) Paul'S USe Of It is perfectly legitimate. 28. Application of the allegory is thus far to believers, especially Galatian believers. Tlie thought brought out in ver. 26 and confirmed in ver. 27 is, " Je- rusalem from above is our mother." The application follows naturally: Now we, or better, ye, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise, and belong to the heavenly Jerusalem. The Gentile believers had no claims of race or descent ; they were sons not after the flesh but after the manner of Isaac, according to promise. 80 also the Jews could claim nothing from mere natural descent, for under their legal system they were the sjiirit- ual descendants of Hagar. Thus Jew- ish believers also were sons according to promise. Thi' j^romise refers to that con- nected with Isaac's birth, and through Christ extends to all believers (Rom. 4 : 16-21 ; 9 : 7-9), Seethe samc conclusion arrived at in 3 : 29. The two readings of the text, ice or ye, have almost equal manuscript support. Westcott and Hort and the Revised version prefer ice ; the majority of critics and the Bi- ble Union version prefer ye. The lat- ter is rather to be preferred on internal grounds. 29. Paul further applies the alle- gory. But as then, he (Ishinael) that Avas born after the flesh per- secuted him that was born after the Spirit {Isaac). In Gen. 21 : 9 it is related that Ishmael was "mock- ing," or "laughing," according to the Hebrew, in a contemptuous manner at Isaac, as the connection seems to re- quire. Tills insulting act indicated the beginning and the spirit of persecution which was manifested in his descend- Ch. IV.] GALATIANS 107 30 'even so it is now. Nevertheless what saith the Scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son : for "the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir 31 with the sou of the freewoman. So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, »but of the free. 30 also is it now. But what says the Scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her sou ; for the son of the bond- woman shall not inherit with the son 31 of the freewoman. Wherefore, breth- ren, we are not children of a bond- woman, but of a freewoman. ( 6 : 12 ; John 15 : 19 ; Acts 21 : 27, 28 ; 1 Thess. 2 : 14, 15. John I 35. 1 ; Johu 8 : 36. ants (1 Chron. 5 : 10, 19; Ps. 83 : 5, 6). Ac- cording to a Jewish tradition Ishmael tormented Isaac. Even so it is now ; as manifested in the hostility of Jews to Christians. This accorded wMth JPaul's own experience. Wherever he went he was followed by Jewish perse- cutors, and even in the churches he was opposed by Judaizing Christians. (See Acts 13 : 50 ; 14 : 2, 19 ; 17 : 5 ; 1 Thess. 2 : u.) And near the end of his life he wrote (2 Tim. 3 : 12), " Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution." ( Comp. e : n ; John 15 : 20; Phil. 1:28.) The cxpression, Born after the Spirit, points to the super- natural manner of his birth, according to the promise, the word Spirit being used with reference to the spiritual birth of believers, as children of prom- ise. 30. Nevertheless what saith the Scripture? What shall be the end of this persecution ? As it ended then, so it shall now. In triumph the apostle quoted the words of Sarah, sanctioned soon after by Jehovah (Geu, 21:10,12), Cast out the bond- woman and her son, both of them : for the son of the bondAvoman shall not be heir, or, shall not in- herit, with the son of the free- woman. The quotation is almost ex- actly from the Septuagint. Instead of " with my son Isaac," Paul says, " with the son of the freewoman," to bring out prominently the contrast of freedom with bondage, which is the chief point of the allegory. The phrase, shall not he heir, is emphatic, shall siirely not, or, shall in nowise have inheritanceioith the son of the freewoman. Judaism can in no wise share with Christianity in the promised inheritance ; works of the law cannot share with faith in Christ as a ground of acceptance with God. Only those who simply trust in Christ, apart from works of the law, are justi- fied, while those who rely on legal ob- servances are condemned. You who are going back to the law are proving yourselves to be children of the bond- woman, and are giving up your true lineage and your inheritance. "It seems scarcely possible to estimate the strength of conviction and depth of prophetic insight which this declara- tion implies. The apostle thus confi- dently sounds the death-knell of Ju- daism at a time when one-half of Chris- tendom clung to the Mosaic law with a jealous aflection little short of frenzy, and while the Judaic party seemed to be growing in influence, and was strong, even in Gentile churches of his own founding, to undermine his influence and endanger his life " (LiGHTFOOT). 31. Conclusion and application of the history and allegory. It is closely connected with the first verse of the next chapter. So then, rather ac- cording to the best text, Wherefore, brethren, we are not children of the, rather, a, bondwoman, but of the free ; we are no children of a bondmaid, be she Jew or heathen, but of the free wife, and therefore we our- selves are free. It follows from the whole preceding argument that we are free from the bondage of the law and from the yoke of its legal observances, and enjoy tlie freedom of the children of God. This thought is brought out and applied to the Galatian believers in 5 : 1. Practical Remarks. 1. The race as well as the Jewish nation had its minority and its appointed term of religious tutelage (ver. 1-3 ; Rom. 1 : 18-20; Acts 14 : 15-17). 2. In the divine economy there is an analogy between the treatment of the race and individuals (ver. 1-3; Acts 17 : 26-30). 3. The sacrifices and external ordi- nances of the old dispensation were es- sential elements in the progress of revela- tion suited to the infancy and minority 108 GALATIAXS [Ch. IV. of the race (ver. 1-3 ; 3 : 2J ; Heb. 9 : 1, 10). 4. At the coming of Clirist the unsup- plied wants of the world demanded a spiritual religion and a divine Saviour (ver. 1 ; Ilaggai 2:7; Isa. 61 : '2-3). 5. It \va.s Christ's mission to save sin- ners and make them sous of God (ver. 5, 6, 10: lJohu3: 1, 2). 6. A spirit of filial affection, faith, and obedience is an evidence of the Holy Spirit's work in the heart, and of adoption into God's family (ver. 6; 5 : 22-24; John 16 : 13. 14). 7. The sonship of believers extends to the glory of Christ, and is beyond human comprehension (ver. 7 ; 1 Cor. 3 : 21-23 ; 1 John 3:2; Kev. 3 : 21 ; Col. 3 : 4 ; 1 Peter 5:1). 8. All men before conversiou are sinners under bondage, whatever their condition or advantages (ver. 8; Rom. 1 : 18, 19; 3 : 19; 5: 12). 9. There is an element in Judaism and formal Christianity, common to lx)th them and pagan religions (ver. 9. 10; Matt. 6 : 7; Col. 2 :8, 20). 10. True religion in the soul is a matter of conscious, personal experience (ver. 6, 9; 2 Cor. 1 : 22; 5 : 5, 10, 17). 11. The knowledge of God which brings spiritual freedom increases our responsi- bility (ver. 9-11 ; John 9 : 41). 12. There is great reason to fear for those who practise ritual observances, lest their profession of godliness and all efforts for their salvation be in vain (ver. 11 ; Isa. 1 : 14 ; 2 Kings 18 : 4 ; Matt. 15 : 8,9). 13. The lapse of Christians into error, and their turning away from the instruction of pastors is not a personal offense against the latter, but a public sin against Christ and his cause (ver. 12 ; Zech. 13 : 6). 14. Strong emotions and ardent affec- tions do not assure a permanent Christian life (ver. 13-1.5 ; 5 : 7 ; Matt. 13 : 20, 21). l.'>. Fickle and emotional people should especially beware, lest their impulses be- come their besetting sins (ver. 14, 15 ; Heb. 12:1). 16. "Faithful are the wounds of a friend " ; but it is very difficult to regard with constant affection one who may at all times tell us the truth (ver. 16 ; Prov. 27 : 6). 17. Fickle and impulsive people are often an easy prey to .self-seeking leaders and false teachers (ver. 17; Acts 14 : 11, 18, 19). 18. True zeal for Christ's cause and true love for his servants will be manifested both in their presence and in their ab- sence (ver. 18; Phil. 2 : 12). 19. A pastor's anxiety for backsliding converts is often as great, and even greater, than that he finst experienced for their conversion (ver. 19, 20; Phil. 3 : 18). 20. To stand in doubt of his spiritual children is one of the most painful ex- periences of the Christian minister (ver. 11, 20; 3:1; 2 Cor. 2 : 12 ; 7 : 5, 6). 21. An argiimentum ad homincm is often the most effective of all arguments and can be properly used to confirm princi- ples, or truths already established (ver. 21-31). 22. Allegory based on history is legiti- mate .«;o far as it accords with the intent of and the will of God in history. His- tory, if truly written, presents God's prov- idence and will as manifested in human affairs. Every human life may be said to contain some moral lesson and some spiritual intent of God in the government of mankind (ver. 21-31). 23. Many events in Old Testament his- tory may be used to illustrate important truths under the gospel, and to guide us in the discharge of many practical duties in life (ver. 21-31 ; James 5 : 10. 11). 21. The Holy Spirit had a religions design in moving men to record so much history in the Old Testament. Hayipy they Avho discern the import and discover the lessons of the sacred narrative (ver. 21-31 ; 2 Tim. 3 : 16, 17 ; 1 Peter 1 : 10, 11 ; 2 Peter 1 : 20, 21). 2.'i. There is no antagonism between the law and the gospel, but between legalism and the gospel (ver. 29, 30; Rom. 11 : 6). 26. Christ is the great Liberator, who delivers us from the bondage of the law and brings us into the liberty of the gos- pel (ver. m, ;n ; 5 : 1 ; John 8 : 36). 27. Christians should recognize their own high calling, as the children of promise, as the freemen of the Lord, Ch. v.] GALATIANS 109 Exhortations to preserve Christimi liberty. 5 y STAND fast therefore in nhe lib- erty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again * with the yoke of bondage. 2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that ^if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit 3 you nothing. For I testify again to 5 WITH freedom did Christ make us free ; stand fast therefore, and be not held again with a yoke of bondage. 2 Behold, I, Paul say to you, that if ye become circumcised, Christ will protit 3 you nothing. And I testify again to y 1 Cor. 16 : 13 ; Heb. 4 : 14 ; Jude 20, 21. 4:3-5: see refs. Johu 8 : 32-36. a See refs. 2 : 4. and as the heirs of the glorious inheritance 1 with Christ (ver. 28-31; Rom. 8 : 14, 17). 28. "The spirit of Christian liberty is eternal. Jerusalem or Rome may strive to imprison it. They might as well seek to bind the winds of heaven. Its home is with God. Its seat is the throne of Christ. It lives by the breath of his Spirit. . . Whosoever he be— Judaist or Papist, priest or king, or demagogue— that makes him- self lord of God's heritage and would despoil his children of the liberties of faith, let liim beware, lest of him also it be spoken, ' Cast out the bondwoman and her son'" (Fixdlay, "Expos. Bible," p. 301.) (Yer. 28-31; Rom. 8 : 31-39; Matt. 16 : 18.) CHAPTER V. The practical portion of this Epistle begins liere and extends to its end. Paul applies the principle of Christian liberty to circumcision. He exhorts the Galatians to hold fast their free- dom lest they forfeit their interest in Christ (ver. 1-6) ; and warns them in re- spect to defection from the right path and against false teachers (ver. 7-12). He shows what is the proper use of Christian liberty, and the correspond- ing life and conduct required (ver. 13-26). 1-6. EXHORTATIOX TO HOLD FAST THEIR FREEDOM IN THE GOSPEL LEST THEY FORFEIT THEIR INTEREST IN Christ. Circumcision will profit them nothing (ver. 1, 2), In submitting to circumcision they become debtors to the whole law (ver. 3) ; and dependence upon the law for justification excludes grace and severs from Christ (ver. 4). Justi- fication comes by faith through the Spirit (ver. 5. 6). 1. This verse is a connecting link be- tween the doctrinal and practical por- tions of the Epistle. It contains the conclusion of the preceding discussion and the beginning of Paul's application of the principles of Christian liberty to circumcision. Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free. The original text is doubtful. But the text approved by most textual critics is : With the free- dom, just spoken of, which is your state and condition as children, and your rightful inheritance; or, For the free- dom of sons — in view of this freedom, not of pupilage, or of an inferior state, but of sons. Compare, " For ye were called to freedom " (ver. is). The dative case in the original can be translated either ivith, or for, as above. Alford adopts the former, and Meyer the lat- ter. The general sense is clear which- ever rendering is employed. With or for the freedom of sonship did Christ make us free from the guilt and curse of the law. (Con.p. Rom. 6 : 16-20.) Stand fast therefore, firmly and upriglit, not Ijowing your neck to the yoke of legal observances; and be not entangled again, he not again held, with a yoke of bondage to Judaism, as ye once were to heathenism. The ritual observ- ances of Judaism were useless and bur- densome, a yoke of bondage upon their fears and their consciences. Compare Peter's address at the Jerusalem Con- ference (Act.s 15 : 10). 2. Paul makes a personal and an authoritative appeal as an apostle, that they should stand fast in the freedom of the gospel and not submit to the bondage of the law. Behold, con- sider and understand clearly, I Paul, an apostle (i ; i), your teacher and friend, to whom ye once were so devoted (4:15), say unto you, uttering the truth solemnly and tenderly, that if ye be circumcised, with the object which you and your teachers have in view, Christ shall profit you noth- ing. Paul cannot refer to the mere fact of being circumcised, for all the Jewish 110 GALATIANS [Ch. V every mail that is circumcised, "that he 4 is a debtor to do the wiiole law. ^Clirist is become of no elTect unto you, who- soever of you are justified by the law ; 5 • ye are "fallen from srace. For we through the Spirit fwait «for the hope 6 of righteousness by faith. For ^iu Jesus every man who becomes circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole 1 law. Ye are separated from Christ, whoever of you are being justified by 5 law ; ye are fallen away from grace. For we through the Spirit by faith wait for 6 the hope of righteousness. For in I 8 : 10. d 2 : 21 ; Rom. 9 : 31, 32. a See 1 : 6-9 ; Heb. 10 : 38, 39 ; 12 : 15 ; 2 Peter 2 : 20-22. / Rom. 8 : 21, 25. g Rom. 1 : 17 ; Phil. 3 : 9 ; 2 Tim. 4:8. h See refs. Rom. 2 : 25-29. converts had received that rite, and from a Christian standpoint neither circumcision nor uncircumeision was anything in itself (ver. 6 ; 6 : i5). But he rather means, If ye submit to be eii- cumcised as a necessary metliod of sal- vation, then you turn away from Christ as your only Saviour. Salvation by law, and salvation l)y grace through faith in Christ, are directly opposite to each other, [n their circumstances the Galatian converts, if they submitted to circumcision, would only do so because they felt it necessary to salvation. 3. With deep emotion the apostle fortifies what he has just said. For, rather. And, more also, I testify, / solemnhj declare, again, knowing whereof 1 afhnn, and repeating more strongly the thought of the preceding verse. Some suppose again to refer to wliat he had said to the Galatians during his last visit. But such a supposition is not necessary. Nor is it needful to suppose that he had to protest against .Tudaizing teacliings during that visit. For it was now a wonder to him that tliey were so soon removing from the truth (1 : 6). I solemnly dec/are again, to every man, whoever he may be, that is circumcised, in being cir- cumcised, submitting to the rite as nec- essary to tlie righteousness demanded for justification (ver. 4-6). In thus sub- mitting to circumcision he turns away from Christ to the law system, which demands perfect obedience as a con- dition of salvati(m. He is a debtor, unch'r obligation, to do the whole law (a: Id). Paul regards the law as a unit, A person cannot embrace a part of the law system of salvation without taking the whole and keeping all of its requirements. In accepting tliis Judai/.iiig ])erversion lie would become a jtroselyte to Judaism and bound to the law as a wliole. Proba- bly the Galatian believers had not thought of the legitimate consequences of thus yielding to this perverted gospel. 4, And more strongly still he puts it, Christ is become of no ettect unto you, severed, separated, or cut off from Christ, whosoever of you are justified by the law, by km (without the article). The Mosaic law is of course meant, but that represented the law principle as found in all legal justification. The apostle in his thought includes all who would be justified by a system of law. Ye are fallen from grace, cncay from the plane of salva- tion by grace, down to the lower plane of working out your salvation by your own righteousness, which you aie pow- erless to do. Paul speaks of the logical result as if already accomplished, though he still has hopes for them (ver. 10), He put the case strongly. If jus- tification is sought by the law, then you forfeit grace and ruin is certain, Tliere is no reference here to the modern doctrine of "falling from grace." Dr. Bart- lett ("Christian Scriptures") and some others take the verb " are fallen " to mean driven, or, cast off', as in Acts 27 : 17, 26, 29, with an allusion to Ha- gar, ye are driven, or, cast forth, like Hagar and her son, from grace. So also Lightfoot. Such an allusion would be a striking one ; but this mean- ing of the word is not common, and is so used by navigators, as above, but is only barely possibly so used here. 5. In this and the next verse the apostle contrasts the faith-]irineiple with the law-principle of the preceding verses, and confirms still liirtber that these two principles are exclusive of each other. For, introduces a confirm- atory reason for the statement of the ! la.st verse, and including all those on the plane of grace We, in contrast to \ the preceding ye. For ire through the Spirit wait, eagerly and patient- I ly, for the hope of righteousness Ch. v.] GALATIANS 111 Christ neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uueircumcision ; but i faith which worketh by love. 7 •'Ye did ' run well : "^ who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth ? 8 This persuasion cometh not of him "^ that Christ Jesus neither circumcision avails anything, nor uueircumcision, but faith working through love. 7 Ye were running well ; who hindered you, that ye should not obey the truth ? 8 The persuasion is not from him who James 2 : 14-26 ; 1 Peter 1 : 1 fc See 4 : 15. I 1 Cor. 9 : 24. 1 :6. by faith, the righteousness which is the result of feith. The righteousness here should not be limited to justification, but should include all that is implied in sanctification, full and complete righteousness, that toward which the Christian advances from the moment he becomes a recipient of grace and exer- cises faith. (Comp. Rom. 13: 11.) So alsO the hope of, etc., is put for the realiza- tion of the hope, as the word promise often denotes the thing promised (Heb. 11 : 39). The verb wait denotes expec- tation of something future rather than something present and already pos- sessed. Compare the use of the verb in Rom. 8 : 19, 23, 25 ; 1 Cor. 1 : 7, etc. Both the Spirit and faith have to do with the beginning of this salvation, the former on God's part, the latter on man's part, and until its full comple- tion and realization in heaven. Two things are here brought to view in this method of salvation by grace : the agency of the Spirit, and faith as a con- dition or means. 6. For, to confirm what I have said, that the hope of righteousness is from or by means of faith, consider the fact that in Jesus Christ, to one in spiri- tual union with him, neither cir- cumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision. It matters not whether a person is circumcised or not ; but faith working through love avail- eth something. A living, active faith is necessary to the realization of that hope and attaining that full and per- fect righteousness. The verl) worketh is not passive, but middle, and active in force, according to its uniform usage in the New Testament (2 Cor. 4 : 12 ; Kph. 3 : 20 ; Col. 1 : 29 ; 1 Thess. 2 : 13, etc.). Faith is not dead but active and living; it ex- presses its energy through love. No- tice that faith, hope, and love, the three graces _(i Cor. 13 : 13), are brought together in this and the preceding verse. Love is a constraining power ; hope helps on to a triumphant realization ; but faith alone is the eye of the soul and takes in Christ and his righteous- ness. Here Paul occupies common ground with James. Both hold to a living, working faith, and a corre- sponding change of heart. (Comp. e : 15 ; 1 Cor. 7 : 19). 7-13. Warning against begin- ning TO DEPART FROM THE RIGHT PATH, AND AGAINST FALSE TEACH- ERS, Paul reminds the Galatians of their good beginning in their Christian life, and assures them that whatever has influenced them into a difierent course is not of God (ver. 7, 8). The evil, if not checked, will soon pervade all (ver. 9). He has confidence, however, that they will still hold to the right, and that their troublers will be punished (ver. 10). He refutes the charge that he still preaches circumcision, and ex- presses a severe wish regarding those who were unsettling their faith (ver. 11, 12). 7. In surprise the apostle speaks of their defection in the Christian life. Ye did run Avell ; ye toere ruyining ivell, nobly, at the beginning of your Christian career. The figure is taken from the race-course, a favorite one with Paul (2:2: Pbii. 3 : 14). " The carcful student will notice that the figures in the other New Testament Avriters are oftener drawn from the natural world about us" (Boise). Who did hinder you, cutting off your way and arrest- ing your progress. It is implied here, and in ver. 10, that some prominent false teacher had done this. That ye should not obey the truth, that ye should not continue to obey the true gospel, according to Avhich salvation is of grace and through faith, and not through legal observances, (see on 3 : 1.) 8. A warning, that it is not of God. The word rendered persuasion occurs only here in the New Testament. It may mean a passive compliance or an active dissiiasion. The latter fits bet- ter with the connection and is preferred by Alford, Ellicott, Meyer, and others. I7ie dissuasion from obeying the truth 112 GALATIANS [Ch. V. 9 cnlloth vou. 0 A little leaven leaveueth 10 the whok' lump, rl have eoiitidcncc in you throujili tlie Lord, thut ye will be none otherwise uiindod : but "i he that troubleth you shall bear his judg- H nient. whosoever he be. 'And I, breth- ren, if I yet i)reaeh cireunicision, » why do I yet sutler persecution ? Then is 12 »the offence of the cross ceased. "I ] 9 cnlls you. A little leaven leavens the ' 10 whole lump. I have confidence as to you in the Lord, tliat ye will be no otherwise minded ; but he that trou- bles you shall bear his judgment, who- 11 ever he may be. But as for nie, breth • ren, if I still preach circumcision, why am I still persecuted? Tlien has the stumbling block of the cross been taken 0 1 Cor. 5 : 6. 7 ; 15 : 33. 29; 6 : 17; Acts 21 : 21, 28. p 2 Cor. 2 : 3 ; 8 : 22. t I Cor. 1 : 23. q See refs. 1:7, etc. r 6 : 12. u Joshua 7 : 25 ; John 9 : 34 ; 1 Cor. 5 (last verse) is not of him that call- eth you, it is not from God who calls Ills people, among whom you are uum- bereti, l)ut from some opposing source. 9. A warning against the pervasive influence of the evil, by the use of what seems to have been a familiar proverb : A little leaven leaveueth the whole lump. The proverb is also found in 1 Cor. 5 : 0. Leaven is usually the symbol of evil in the Scriptures. As the lump of leaven in the dough communicates lightness to the whole mass, so of influences in a community. Some apply the leaven to the false teaching of Judaism, which, though just beginning, would in due time lead to its complete adoption, to the entire perversion of the gospel. This appli- cation is favored by the false teachings implied in ver. 8. But others refer the leaven to the fal.se teachers, who but few in number and onlj'^ one promi- nently, would increase until the infec- tion should reach to the whole body. This is favored by the individual refer- ence in ver. 10. It seems to me that the apostle uttered the proverb with more special reference to the first view, l>ut also extends the application men- tally to the second. The two views are not so different that they cannot be combined. If tlie doctrines are meant, then it is these as promulgated l)y the false teacliers.; and if the teachers are meant, then it is they as teaching the false doctrines. 10, Notice how abruptly Paul goes frttm one point to another in these I verses. Now he expresses himself more favorably respecting the (Jalatian con- verts, showing that hedid not regard them as having apostatized, but rather as in danger of .so doing. I, niy.self (em- phatic), remembering your conversion and your zeal for Christ, have confi- dence in you through the Lord, rather, in regard to you in the Lord, that ye will be none otherwise minded than I am. Compare "I beseech you, brethren, become as I am " (4 : 12). He believes, notwithstand- ing the influence of false teachers, that they will be in accord with the teach- ings and warning of this chapter and, indeed, of the whole Epistle, and adopt no other principles. (Comp. 2 Thess. 3:4; Rom. 8 : 5; Phil. 3: 15.) But he that troubleth you, having in view some prominent false teacher who was ex- citing and perplexing their minds with scruples and doubts and beginning to cause debates and factions {^ ■ "!), shall bear his judgment, his condemna- tion before Cod. (comp. josh. 7 : 25.) The verb bear carries aloiig with it the idea of that which bears severely, heavily on any one. M hoever he may be, whatever his position, or personal char- acter and standing. Thus the apos- tle's vehemence is directed against false teachers and principles rather than against the church itself. 11, At this point he remembers that his opposers had maliciously charged him with preaching circumcision him- self, in that to the Jew he became as a Jew, and had even practised circum- cision, as in the case of Timothy, just be- fore his first visit to Galatia (acu 16:3, 6). Such a charge against him was absurd on its very face in view of the persccii- I tions he endured. And I (emphatic), Hut as for me, brethren, as you are in name and I believe in spirit, if I yet preach circumcision, and Judaize, why do 1 yet sufler persecution ? why do these Judaizers still persecute me? Then, in that ca.se of my preach- ing circumcision, fias the offence, t/ir s(uml)/i)ig-l>Ioe/:, of the cross evased, passed away. The cross was a stumbling-block, not only because it presented the Messiah suflering a most Ch. v.] GALATIANS 113 would they were eveu cut off » which trouble you. 12 away. I would that they who are un- settl'ing vou would even cut themselves Acts 15 : 1, 2, 24. shameful death, but also especially be- [ Cybele." The verb and the \yordeven, cause his atoning death cut ott" all in the original, indicate an action be- ground of human merit by works of j'ond circumcision; and so the Revised the law and presented salvation by faith alone in him. Paul notices this stumi)ling-block in the way of Israel in Rom. 9 : 31-33, and Peter to the so- journers in Galatia and elsewhere in Asia Minor (1 Peter 2 :6-8), If his preach- ing was not opposed to the law as a means of salvation, then surely it could be no otfeuse to them. VZ, In view of such an absurd and malicious charge, and of the serious injury that Judaizing teachers might do to the Galatia n converts, Paul gives vent to his righteous indignation. I would they were even cut off, rather, that they would even cut themselces off h'om you, or better still, that they would go beyond circumcision and mutilate themselves, Avhich trou- ble you, ivho are unsettling jowy be- liefs, turning you upside down with Judaizing errors ! In that case tliey version renders, " would even go be- yond circumcision," putting "mutilate themselves" in the margin. Pessiuus, one of the chief cities of Galatia, was the home of the worship of Cybele, in honor of whom such mutilations were prac- tised. " Such an allusion would be at once understood. Thus by glorying in the flesh the Galatians were returning in a marked way to the bondage of their former heatlienism " (Lightfoot). Thus understood the language expresses a wish of just sarcasm, tliat these advo- cates of a fleshly rite would go the ex- treme of making themselves eunuchs, like the priests of Cybele. By so doing they would show- the fearful tendencj' of their principles, and they could no longer be an injury to true believers. The Greek commentators generally take this view% as do also most of the leading modern expositors. "It is not to be ould sirow their true character, and ! rejected only because it is displeasing n o,l • ^1 . !• li ,I11'_ /> .1 J.' ))/T„„. the tendency of their false teachings and would be no real injury to you. In regard to the verb cut off, all interpre- ters are agreed that it is not passive, but middle. Two explanations are given. (1) "I would that they who are unsettling and stirring up seditions among you would go further and even cut themselves off from you " — openly secede from the church instead of re- maining as a disturbing element. This ethical idea agrees with what they were doing in abandoning gospel truth and leading others to abandon it. Paul could well wish that teachers of such sectarian aims would wholly withdraw from the company of believers. Besides, the next interpretation is objected to as being very unlike the earnest gravity of Paul and unlike everything else in the New Testament. This interpreta- tion is possible, Avith due regard to the Greek, and in view of the fact that a verb often changes from the physical to the ethical with the change of voice. Or (2) "I would that these advocates and of circumcision would go furthe mutilate themselves, like the priests of fleshly lusts (ver. le-is) H to the delicacy of modern times " (Jow- ett). "Circumcision under the law and to the Jews was the token of a cov- enant. To the Galatians under the gospel dispensation it had no such sig- nificance. It was merely' a bodily mu- tilation, as such diftering rather in de- gree than in kind from the teri'ible practices of the heathen priests " (Lightfoot). (comp. pi.ii. s: 2, s.) For Paul's severity of language compare Acts 13 : 10, 40^ 41 ; 2 Cor. 11 : 19. This view is not necessarily demanded by, but accords better with, the original, and would most naturall}' suggest itself to the Galatian readers. It would be bet- ter for these false teachei'S to go to this terrible extreme than to teach Judaism under the covert of Christianity and pervert the gospel. 13-26. The PROPER USE OF Chris- TIAX LIBERTY AND THE CORRESPOND- ING LIFE AND CONDUCT REQUIRED. Liberty is not license, and must not be abused, but must be exercised by the law of love (ver. 13-15). Under the guid- ance of the Spirit they will not fulfill - — • - The Spirit, not 114 GALATIANS [Ch. V. Chrislian liberty and practical godliness. 13 For, brethren, ye have been called uiilo liberty; only ruse not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but » by love 11 serve one another. For ''all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou Shalt love thy neighbour as thy- self. 15 Hut ''if ye bite and devour one an- other, take heed that ye be not con- sumed cue of another. 13 For ye were called to freedom, breth- ren ; only use not your freedom for an occasion to the flesh, but through love 14 serve one another. For the whole law is fullilled in one word, in this: Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. 15 But if ye bite and devour one another, beware lest ye be consumed one by an- other. y 1 Cor. 8 : 9 ; 1 Peter 2 : 16 ; 2 Peter 2 : 19. h Matt. 7 : 12; 22 : 39, 40. a 6 : 2 ; Rom. 15 : 1, 2 ; 1 John 3 : 16-19. c James 3 : 14-18. the flesli, should guide them (ver. 19-24^ ; in view of which they should avoid boasting, strife, and envy (ver. 25, 26). 13. Tlie apostle returns to the thought of ver. 1, For introduces a reason why they should not yield to legal bondage and to false teachers. For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty, rather, ye ivere called, at your conversion, /o?-/?-ee(/o/«. Free- dom was the condition and object, the very idea and spirit of your calling. (See ver. 8.) Bondage to circumcision and to legal observances is opposed to this. Paul, however, sees that the Galatian converts needed to be guided in the prop- er use of their liberty, lie cautions them, however, against its abuse, and against falling into sensual indulgences. Live on the plane of freedom, and in its privileges and blessings make full use of it, only use not liberty, use not your freedom from the law as a ground of justification, for an occasion to the flesh, to sinful human nature, for indulging in carnal desires, evil speak- ing, and wrong-doing (ver. 10,11). Make not your freedom a basis, a starting- point ,a pretext, for evil indulgences and of throwing ot!' restraint. Freedom is not license. Freedom abused be- omes bondage to the flesh. It must not run into .\ntinomianism. But by, by means of, love serve one another. Act as bond servants to one another. Love is the ruling principle in your new condition of freedom, an essential element of your new spiritual life. Its very spirit is service to others. See to it, tlien, tliat your freedom is tempered, limited, and directed through a .service of love. Freed from the bondage of ritual ob.servances and legal obedience, you will find your truest and highest freedom in serving one another. "A beautiful contra.st " (Bengel). 14. The apostle explains what is ac- complished by serving one another. For all the'laAV, the whole Mosaic law in respect to this, is fulfilled, summed up and accomplished, in one word, in one injunction, that of love: Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Quoted from the Septuagint ( Lev. 19 : 18). Tliis brief injunction Avould suggest tlie longer summary which in- cludes love to God (Luke 10: 27). Bcsidcs, true love to God and true love to man are inseparable. If we really have the one we will have the other. That ideal state of heart required to exercise per- fect love toward our neighbor would exercise a corresponding love toward God. Moreover, the serving of one another and the application he wished to make (next vei^se), required only the command to love one's neighbor. (Comp. Rom. 13 : 8-10, and note.) Christianity has incorporated all that was imperishable and essentia] to moral truth in the Mo- saic precepts and teachings. Paul did not ignore these as precepts of life, but as grounds of merit and acceptance with (iod. (See on .Malt. 5: 17.) 15. But if, contrary to this law of love, ye bite and devour one an- other, acting like wild beasts, if under the influence of evil passions and party spirit you engage in party strife, such as these Judaizing teachings engender, take heed that ye be not con- sumed one of another, utterly ruined and destroyed as a Christian community. Without love they would be without fellowship; parties would be ruined in the conflict, and the mem- bers of the church scattered. The words here are, however, but a simple suppo- Ch. v.] GALATIAXS 115 16 This T say then, ^ Walk in the Spirit, •"and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the 17 flesh. For ^the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh : eand these are contrary the one to the other : ^ so that ye cannot do the things 18 that ye would. "But ' if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law. 16 But I say, Walk by the Spirit, and ve will not fulfill the desire of the flesh. 17 For the flesh has desires against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesli ; and these are contrary the one to the other, that ye may not do those things 18 that ye wish. But if ye are led by the Spirit, ye are not under law. d Rom. 8 : 1, 4, 12-14. e Col. 3 : 5-10 ; 1 Peter 2 : 11. / Rom. 7 : 18-25. ^ Rom. 8 : 5-8. ft Rom. 7 : 15, 19. i 4 : 4-7 ; Rom. 8 : 2, 14. sition, not implying anything as to the actual state of things then existing in the Galatian church, but containing a warn- ing of what might result from false teachings and party strife. 16. The apostle gives the remedy against lusts of the flesh. The last three verses have brought into contrast a life of love and one of selfish strife. From this to the end of the chapter we have these two courses of life more fully exhibited. This I say then, now this is what I mean, Walk in, rather, by, the Spirit, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, and according to his will. (comp. Rom. 8: 4.) And ye shall not, a strong assertion, and ye will not by any means fulfil the lust, the desire, of the flesh. Flesh is the sin- ful nature opposed to God, pervading the entire man before conversion, and continuing in its remnants after con- version. These two forces, the Spirit and flesh, are contrary to eacli other, and w-e can overcome the latter if we are imbued by the former (Rom. 7 : 25). 17. The reason for the foregoing state- ment derived from the antagonism of the flesh and spirit. For the flesh lusteth against, hath desires op- posed to, the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; and, or accord- ing to many of the best documents, /or, these, the"^ flesh and Spirit, are con- trary the one to the other. There is a conflict in the spiritual life of the Christian ; the flesh, the remains of the sinful nature, the old man, is in deadly opposition to the new nature and to the Holy Spirit, its Author. So that ye cannot, rather, according to the most approved text, that, expressing the purpose of each contending party, ye may not, do the things that ye would in either case. The Spirit striving that ye may not do what ye would under the influence of the flesh, and the flesh trying to keep you from do- ing what j'^ou wish under the influence of the Spirit. This seems to be the most logical view. The conflict is that of the Christian, in which the Spirit strives against the flesh and its evil doing; and the flesh against the Spirit and its well doing. The unregenerate are un- der the full control of the flesh. But in the regenerate each is striving for the ma.stery. So long as the flesh fails of complete victory it does not what it desires; and so long as the Christian under the guidance of the Spirit fails of complete conformity to Christ, he does not what he wishes. ( Comp. Rom. 7 .- 14-25, and notes.) This versc Icavcs the Christian with these two contending forces, each striving, but neither ac- complishing itij full object, 18. But if ye be, are, led, and continuing to be led, by the Spirit ye are not under law (the omitted), not under bondage, as in the case of Hagar (+ : 25)^ nor under its tutelage (» : 24), but have the free- dom of sons (4 : 31), bringing forth the fruits of the Spirit against which there is no law (ver. 2.'?), crucifying the flesh with its passions and desires (^er. 24), and not under the condemnatory .sen- tence of the law (ver. 21). Comp. Rom. 8:4, " For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God." Such are not under law as a means of justification, but are assured of freedom. Analogous is the thought of Paul in Rom. 6 : 14, " Ye are not under law but under grace," therefore " sin," which dominates in the flesh, " shall not have dominion over you." The fruit of the Spirit, of which love stands finst (ver. 22)^ is in fact the fulfilling of the law (^er. 14), being in unison with the law. It is also true, though not the exact point brought out in this passage, that so far as a person is led by the Spirit, the law is written on his heart, and it becomes a joy to o])ey God. 116 GALATIANS [Cii. V. 19 Now k the works of the flesh are man- ifest, which are these: Adultery, form- eat ion, unc-leamiess, laseiviousnet^s, •JO idolatry, witehcrait, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, 21 'heresies, envyings, murders, drunken- ness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell vou before, as I have also told i/ou in tiuie past, that ™they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. j 19 Now the works of the flesh are mani- ' fest; which are, fornication, unclean- 20 ness, wantonness, idolatry, sorcery, en- ! mities, party spirit, jealousy, wraths, 21 contentions, divisions, factions, envy- iiigs, murders, drunkenness, revelings, j and things like these : of which I tell you beiorehand, as I also said before, that they who ])ra(tise such tilings shall not'inherit the kingdom of God it Sec Malt. 15 : 18-20 ; Eph. 5.3, Col. 3:5; James 3 : 14, 15. J 1 Cor. 11 ; 19. m See rcfs. 1 Cor. 6 ; »-l!. 10-21. Paul illustrates the two op- positi- modes of life by the works of the ricsh and the fruit of the Spirit. He thus gives the (ialatians a test by which tliey may know whether they Ijelongto tile one or the other ; and shows the un- mistakalile and certain tendency and result of both. The list of each is not exhaustive, but sufficiently full to show their ri'spective nature and character. Now the works of the flesh, the deeds of man's sinful nature, are manifest, are notorious, openly known, which are as follows, giving noted instances. Four classes are given. ( 1 ) Sins of sensuality : Adultery, for- nication, uncleanuess, impurity, and those unnatural vices to which many heathen were addicted, lascivi- ousness,open wantonness and shame- less profligacy. Adultery, omitted by best manuscripts. The idea appears to be included in the general term, for- nication (Mntt. 5 : 32). NotC that thcSC three sins are mentioned in 2 Cor. 12 :21. (2) Sins connected with false religions : Idolatry, the worshij) of false gods (.oti.p. 1 Cor. 5: 11), witchcraft, or sor- ceries, using magical arts, often secretly (Acts 19: i<») ; tlicsc two words are asso- ciated together in Rev. 21 : 8, referring as here to the superstitious wor- ship of the heathen. (3) Sins against one's lu'ighbor, or violations of the law of love: Hatred, better, enmities; variance, or, sfriO-; emulations, hi:{tvr, jrafoiisi/ ; wraths, outbursts of passion ; strife, rather, intrigues for selfish and party ends. For the last four compare 2 Cor. 12 : 20, where they are named in the same order. Seditions, better, dirisions, dissen- sions; heresies, rather, /(/<7/o»s, par- ties growing out of di.ssensions (i Cor. II : 18) ; envyintis, wi.shing to de- prive others of what they have; mur- ders, the greatest violation of the law ' of love, the extreme of hatred. The ' word murder is omitted by some an- cient texts, "but it prol)ably should be retained. (4) Intemperate excesses, or sins against one's self. Drunken- ness, in the plural, denoting many and I repeated acts, revellings, particularly at night, and generally accompanied with drunkenness (the same iu Rom. 13 : lA), and such like, evil deeds r^imilar to these mentioned in verses 1!»-21. Of which things I tell you before, / I foreu'ar)i you as I also did forewarn you "when I was with you, that they I Avliich do, practise, such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. They that sow to the tlesli shall of tlie flesh reap corruption, and shall fail of " life eternal" (6:8). They are not children of the kingdom here, and shall not inherit its blessings hereafter. They shall not " partake of the eternal salvation of the ^lessiah's kingdom " (TiiAYER), not having faith that works through love (^er. c), but having charac- ter and deeds diametrically opposed to its principles and truths. I This list of current sins differs suffi- j ciently from other descriptions in Paul's Epistles to suggest that it was specially I applicable to the Galatians. (comp. Rom, 1 : 29-31 : 1 Cor. 6 : 9. 10 ; Eph. 5 : 3, 4 : Col. S : 5, ; 7, 8 ; 1 Tim. 6. 4, 5.) " From early habit and constant association a Gentile church would be peculiarly exposed to the sins of the first two classes. The third would be a probable consequence of their religious dissensions, inflaming the excitable temperament of a Celtic people " ( LiGHTFOOT). Strife and di- vision have been proverbial of the Gal- lic race; of quick temper, jealous and irritable, enthusiastic and generous. The fourth also would fit the Gallic people, who have been prone to the ex- 1 cesses of strong drink, Peter warns the CJalatians, among others, against Ch. v.] GALATIANS 117 22 But "the fruit of the Spirit is « love, joy, peace, loiigsuffering, p gentleness, 23 goodness, faitli, meekness, temperance: 2-1 1 against such there is no law. And they that are Christ's have f crucified theflesh with the atfectious and lusts. 22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long-suflering, kindness, good- 23 ness, faith, meekness, self-control ; against such things there is no law. 24 And they that are of Christ Jesus cruci- fied the flesh with its passions and de- n Eph. 5 : 9. Rom. 5 : 1-5 ; Col. 3 : 12-17. r Rom. 6:6; 13 : 14 : p Jame Peter 2 : 11. q 1 Tim. "excess of wine, revellings, carousings and unhallowed idolatries " (i Peter + : a, 4). The Romans were more noted for gluttony than for drunkenness. Tlie Greeks were comparatively a sober peo- ple. The Gallic people were frank and impulsive and comparatively free of lying and injustice, which are found in other lists, but not in this. 3;2, 23. We have here a list, though not a complete one, of the fruit of the Spirit. Notice that it is not works of the Spirit, nor of those in whom the Spirit works, but the fniit. True re- ligion is not a set of good deeds, a form of godliness, but it is an inward power, a right disposition of the heart, a re- newed character, bearing fruit " in all goodness and righteousness and truth" (Eph. 5:9). The works of the flesh are many, springing out of many desires, often hostile among themselves, and not always found in one person. But the fruit of the Spirit is essentially one and had an inner unity. Its manifesta- tions in the soul are harmonious and helpful, one with another, and grow out of the one element of love. He that has the Spirit has within him the root of all Christian graces, which may be developed into the activities of all Christian living. Love stands first in this list of nine Christian virtues, at the foundation. Christian love is peculiar to Christianity. "The word {h<^-^^, agape) scarcely occurs in classic Greek, but in the New Testament over one hundred times ; whereas the old clas- sic word (<|)t'Vta) occurs l)ut once in the New Testament, the friendship of the woi'ld (James 4 : 4)." Joy, in the Lord, in the Holy Spirit («<""• n -. \7 ; Phil, i : i). Peace, in the conscience and with God {Rom. 5 : i). Longsuf- fering, patience and endurance under injuries and provocations (Heb. e : 12 ; James 5 : 10). Geiitleiiess, better, kindness, actively disposed and ex- ercised toward others. Goodness, uprightness in heart and life (Rom. 15 : 14; 2 Thess. 1 : u). Faith, trustful- ness, or as some would render, faith- fulness, in relation to God and men. Comp. 1 Cor. 13 : 7, where it is said that love " believeth all things." Meekness, a mild sul)mission of the soul to the dealings of God and the treatment by men. Temperance, self-control, in all respects a self-mas- tery over appetites and desires, over the body and soul. (Comp. i Cor. 9 : 25.) Against such things as the virtues above enumerated there is no law. The law does not oppose nor condemn them, but approves such things. "The law is not made for a righteous man, but for the landless and disobedient" (1 Tim. 1:9). And SO the apostle sub- stantiates verse 18, " If ye be led by the Spirit, ye are not under law." Ye possess and cultivate these graces, and ye who are so led are not under law, for there is no law against these quali- ties which ye possess. 24. The apostle adds another thought, indicating how they who walk by the Spirit do not fulfill the desires of the flesh, and are not under law (^er. le, 18) : Christians have been crucified to the flesh, have renounced it and in Christ are dead to it. And they that are Christ's, who belong to him by redemption and have his spirit leading them and bearing fruit in their hearts and lives, have crucified, more strictly, crucified, the fiesh, at their conversion, renouncing a life of sin and condemning their own wicked hearts, with the affections, passions, and lusts, or, desires, growing out of them. Compare "I am crucified with Christ" (2 : 20). " We who died to sin." "Buried with him through baptism" (Rom. 6 : 2, 4). " If yc put to death the deeds of the body ye shall live " (Ro'u- 8: 13). Christians are conceived of as crucified to the flesh, by which its power is subdued, and its sinful im- pulses are rendered ineffective. The fruit of the Spirit follows and indicates lis GALATIANS [Ch. V. 25 If we live in the Spirit, » let us also walk '2G in the Spirit. 'Let us not be desirous of vain f,'lory, i)r()Vokiug oue another, en- vying one another. 25 sires. If we live by the Spirit, by the 26 Spirit let us also walk. Let us not be- come vainglorious, provoking oue an- other, envying one another. « Ver. 16 ; Rom. 8:4,5. t Phil. 2 : 1-3. this crucifixion. It is conceived of as in tlie ])ast and already accomplished, since the end is assured. They died to tlie Hesh that they might live untoUod. As a consequence tliis crucilixion is continued sw long as the evil remains (Col. 3: 5), a fact wiiich needed not to be stated, but injplied l)y what follows. 25. A further inference and applica- tion. If, therefore, having crucified the riesh, Ave live in, or, />//, the Spirit, sustained by the power of the Spirit, let us also walk in, or, by, the Spirit. Let our outer life correspond, keep step ivit/i, our inner life. The verb iva/k is not the same one as in verse 16, and suggests an orderly, measured course of conduct l)y the aid of the Spirit, and according to his guidance. Notice the apostle uses the first person plural, in- cluding himself with those needing the exh.)rt;ition and softening the rebuke which his words might imply. 26. The positive inference of the pre- cctling verse is applied negatively. If a person is walking by the Spirit of (lod he will avoid the works of the flesh mentioni-d in this verse. Let us not be, rather, become, vahigluri- ons, suggesting a danger of the sin, though not yet manifested ; provoking one another, cJiaUenging one an- other, on the part of those who might feel the stronger ; envying one an- other, on the part of the weak who were not able to vaunt themselves nor to challenge and retaliate. There ap- pears to be a reference here to the sjjirit of rivalry and jealousy and party strife awakened among them by Ju- dai/ing influences. In all this there Wiis a departure from the life and stand- ard of the Spirit. "There is a grada- tion of phrases used here. Vain glory provokes contention ; contention pro- duces envy " ( Lightfoot). Practical Remarks. 1. Freedom in Christ is freedom i'l the truth. It should be guarded with the ut- most vigilance (ver. 1 ; Pliil. 1 : 27 ; 1:1). 2. Christ is tl»e only and an absolute ^ Saviour. He will not share with any rite I or observance in the honor of salvation through his death (Acts 4 : 12 ; 1 Cor. 3 : 11). I 3. Nominal and especially formal Chris- tianity partakes of the bondage of the law, rather than the freedom of the gos- pel (ver. 3 ; Rom. 6 : IG, 17 ; 2 Tim. 3 : 2-5). 4. Scriptural failing from grace is the falling away from the higher plane of salvation by grace to the lower plane of salvation by works (ver. 4; Rom. 3: 20; 11:6). 5. Our whole salvation from first to last is dependent on faith, through the agency of the Spirit (ver. 5 ; Eph. 1 : 13, 14 ; Heb. 10: 38, 39). 6. Faith is not a mere intellectual exer- cise, it is not a mere orthodox belief, but a living, confiding trust, tliat reaches the heart, controls the affections, and affects the life (ver. 6; Eph. 2:8; James2: 18,20). 7. Truth demands obedience. Whatever is false in doctrine or in practice is a hin- drance (ver. 7 ; Luke 11 : 5ii; 1 Peter 2 : 7). 8. Whatever or whoever, teaches salva- tion through rites and ceremonies, is not of God (ver. 8 ; 1 : 6-8 ; Col. 2 : 20-23). 9. One false doctrine introduced into a church may corrupt its entire member- ship (ver. 9; Rev. 2 : 14, 16). 10. There is hope for those who have gone astray, if they have been truly eon- verted (ver. 10 ; 1 Cor. 1 : 4, 9 ; 2 Cor." 2 : 3). 11. Persecution is often a proof that those persecuted are not men-pleasers, but faithful in the truth (ver. 11 ; 1 : 10). 12. False teachers who unsettle the minds of Christians in reference to essen- tial doctrines of the gospel shall suffer condemnation. They are unworthy of church-membership and can well be left of God to tiieir own ways (ver. 10, 12; 2 Peter 2: 13, 19; 3: 16). 13. Liberty has its perils. Rightly un- derstood and practised it is a blessing ; but wrongly understood and perverted it is a curse (ver. 1:5-15; John 8: 31-;?S). H. Faith in Christ enforces the law of Ch. VI.] GALATIANS 119 6 BRETHREN, "if a man be overtaken in a iault, ye ^^ which are spiritual, y re- > BRETHREN, if a man be even caught in any trespass, ye who are u Rom. 14 : 1 ; 15 : 1. xl Cor. 2 : 15; 3 : 1. love. The service of love is the highest freedom (ver. 14; 1 John 5: 3-5). 15. Hatred and angry contentions are subversive of freedom., and destructive of true religion (ver. 15, 20, 21 ; 1 John 3 : 12 ; Judell). 16. Living under the guidance of the Spirit is a safeguard against the cravings of the evil that remains within us (ver. 16; Rom. 8:4, 6, 10, 11). 17. In the renewed man there is the bat- tle of the flesh and the Spirit, and it is through submitting to the guidance of the Spirit that the Christian gains the victory through Christ (ver. 17, 18 ; Rom. 7:25; 8 : 16, 17, 2S). 18. The mastery of the flesh belongs to those who are Christ's and have the in- dwelling Spirit (ver 18-23 ; Ezek. 36 : 26. 27). 19. The works of the flesh are an un- answerable proof of human depravity (ver. 20, 21 ; Jer. 17: 9). 20. The works of the flesh debar from heaven. It is well that they cannot be admitted there to mar its purity and hap- piness( ver. 21 ; Rev. 21 : 8, 27). 21. The works of the flesh and the fruit of the Spirit show the necessity of the new birth in order to salvation (ver. 21-23 ; John 3: 3, 5, 6.) 22. What is truly good in the Christian is not to be traced to himself but to the Spirit. Christian graces are the fruit of the Spirit (ver. 22; 2: 20; Rom. 7: 18, 22). 23. True religion makes a person trust- ful and faithful, both toward God and men (ver. 22 ; 2 Cor. 7:11; Rom. 12 : 11). 24. Christians in their justification, in the crucifixion of the fiesh, and in follow- ing the Spirit, have no law to condemn them (ver. 23, 24 ; 1 Cor. 9 : 26, 27). 25. Christians to be fully consistent should yield themselves wholly to the guidance of the Spirit (ver. 25). 26. All self-glorying, strife, and envy are unbecoming creatures of a day; and should vanish before that honor that be- longs to God alone (ver. 26 ; Rom. 12 : 19 ; John 5: 44; 1 Tim. 1: 17). CHAPTER VI. Paul continues to speak of the con- duct required by a proper exercise of Christian liberty. He tells them how to treat a sinning brother (ver. i)^ ex- horts them to patience and mutual as- sistance according to the law of love (ver. 2)^ and cautions them against self- esteem (ver. 3-5). He eiijoius liberality in support of tlieir teachers, and indeed in every good work, on the ground that wliat a man sows that he must reap (ver. 6-10). In couclusioii, tlic apostle appeals to the large letters in which he had written the Epistle with his own hand (ver. ii), warns them once more against false teachers (ver. 12, is)^ de- clares his boast to be in the cross of Christ alone (ver. 14)^ and that in Christ a new creature was the essential thing, and on such he invokes a blessing (ver. 15, 16). He affirms his unalterable de- votion to Christ and closes with a bene- diction (ver. 17, 18). 1-10. The proper conduct re- quired UNDER Christian liberty. Forbearance toward the erring; meek- ness, as to ourselves; liberality toward teachers and others, according to the law of love and to the law of spiritual harvest. See preliminary analysis at the beginning of the chapter. 1. Paul has just exhorted the Gala- tians against vainglory, provocation, and envy. He now goes further ana enjoins a gentle spirit and treatment toward a sinni ng brother. He exercises the same loving spirit toward them, styling them Brethren, of me and of one another. The spirit of brethren should be exercised both by me and by yourselves. (Comp. Acts 7:26.) "A whole argument lies hidden under this one word" (Beza). If a man be overtaken in a fault. As if Paul had said, I go further, If even a man be stirprised in any trespass. The word "trespass" is a misdeed, "a lapse or deviation from truth and uprightness" ("Thayer's Lexicon"). It here de- notes some particular act of sin. The exact meaning of the verb " overtaken " is doubtful. The question is whether 120 GALATIANS [Ch. VI. store such an one "in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, »lest thou also be tcnijtted. 2 ''Hear ve one another's burdens, and 3 so fulfil nhe law of Christ. For «»if a man think himself to be something, spiritual restore such a one in a spirit of meekness ; considering thyself, lest 2 thou also be tempted. Bear one an- other's burdens, and so fulfill the 3 law of Christ. For if any one thinks himself to be something, when he is z 2 Thess. 3 : 15. o 1 Cor. 10 : 12 ; James 3:2. 6 Rom. 15 : 1 ; 1 Thess. 5 : 14. c John 13 : U, 15, 34, 35. d Luke 18 : 10-13 ; Rom. 12 : 3, 16 ; 1 Cor. 8 : 2. Paul means surprised into committing sin, whieli i)ursued him faster than lie fouKl escape tVoni it, or surprised, de- tecfrd, or cmiglit, in the act of tiie sin. lioth views are supported by eminent authorities. The former, which is the more common view, is favored by the context and l)y tlie last verb, tempted, in this verse, which suggests that the person liad been surprised and had lai)sed into sin through temptation. Tlie suddenness of the temptation would also be a reason for gentle treatment and a ground for hope of restoration. In any trespass, liowever, implies its actual commission and being really held in its grasp or power. Ye which, who, are spiritual, spiritu- ally minded, and led by the Spirit and ])ringing forth the fruits of the Spirit (5 : 22, 23). Compare " natural " and "spiritual," "spiritual" and "car- nal" (1 Cor. 2 : 14, 15; 3:l). In Rom. 15 : 1, Paul contrasts the " strong" and the " weak." Restore, mend, set right, such an one, bring him back into the riglit way, in the, rather, in a, spirit of meekness, gentleness. Compare the same word contrasted with the " rod " in 1 Cor. 4 : 21. The temper of mind is here meant, imply- ing the indwelling Spirit, one of whose fruits is meekness (5 : 23). Restoration of the fallen brother could not be effected i»y harshness and bitterness, but by that meekness possessed by the -spiritual and which is the product of tlie Spirit. The Holy Spirit is indeed the author of tlie restoration, but he employs human agency for accomplish- ing it. Considering thyselt, thy own weakness and Iial>ility to sin. Notice the cliange from the plural to the singular, making the api)lication the more personal and pointed. Lest thou also, like him who has already fallen, bo tempted, lest thou also under temptation fall into sin and need symj)athy and help, (f'omp. 1 Cor. 10 : 12.) A con.sciousness ot cue's own weakness ! will prevent hasty and harsh treatment i of an otiending brother. Compare the same spirit commended to the Corin- thians in their treatment of an oflender (2 c.r. 2 ; 5-8) and which he hoped him- self to exercise (1 Cor. 4 : 21). Such un- designed coincidences are evidences of j the genuineness of these P>pistles. I - 2. One another's burdens, /«e«r^ j weights, whatever presses heavily on the I mind, such as cares, anxieties, and sor- rows, suggested here by the anxiety and I sorrow of the trespassing brother, but extending to all the burdens of the Christian brotherhood. The words are emphatic. Perhaps with some refer- ence to the legal Judaic burdens they were imposing on themselves. Bear ye, carry, take on thyself; not_only sympathize with, but share in car- I ryiiig and, if possible, in removing them. And not only thy own burden, but share in carrying those of others. I And so, in this manner, completely, fulfil the law of Christ, his law of love, as given and exemplified by him j (Matt. 8 : 17). "A ucw commaudmcnt I give unto you, That ye love one an- other ; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another" (JoLu is : 34; 15 : 12). The Apostle John thus applies tliis law: "Hereby know we love, because he laid down his life for us; and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren" (1 John 3 : le). Christ's law- is the highest and most perfect law of love. (comp. Rom. 15 : 1-3. ) This was the law for them to fulfill, which would embrace all law (5 : 14). Some ancient manuscripts have the future tense of the verb, and so ye will fulfill, etc., but the common reading with the impera- tive is to be preferred. 3. This verse confirms the preceding by showing the evils of an opposite spirit. For if a man think him- self, if he seems and appears to him- self, to be something:, to be morally strong so as not to need the help of others, and so great us to raise him Ch. VI.] GALATLIXS 121 when he is nothing, he deoeiveth him- 4 self. But <" let every man prove his own work, and then shall he have f rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another. 5 For s every man shall bear his own bur- den. 6 ^ Let him that is taught in the word 4 nothing, he deceives himself. But let each one prove his own work, and then will he have ground of glorying in ref- erence to himself alone, and not to 5 another. For each one shall bear his own load. 6 But let him that is taught in the word 2 Cor. 13 : 5. /Prov. 14 : 14 ; 1 John 3 : 19-22. g See refs. Rom. 2 ?i See refs. Luke 10 : above the duty of carrying the burdens i of others, when, it is evident in such : a case that he is nothing, in no way j superior but really wortliless spirit- ually, he deceiveth himself, he de- ceives his own mind, he practices upon himself a mental and moral deception. Self-conceit implies a certain worth- lessness, is unsympathetic, and opposed to a spirit of meekness, to humility and unselfish love, and is delusive. " The true greatness of the Christian is found Avhere Christ's greatness was found, in service and usefulness" (G. B. Ste- vens). " The man whose piety is not ; in his life, but in his imagination, is subject to a fatal but cherished error" (HOVEY). (Comp. Luke 18 : 11 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 10.) 4. But, as opposed to such self-con- ceit and self-delusion, let every man, let each one, prove, habitually examine and test, his own Avork (collective in sense, reference being to his whole life and conduct). Thus he will avoid self- deception and get a proper estimate of himself; he will discover how his mo- tives and conduct meet the require- ments of the law of love. And then, in that ease having done this, shall he have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another, rather, will he have ground of glorying in ref- erence to himself alone, to his inner self rather than to the mere exterior, and not in reference to another, to bis estimate of the character and attain- ment of his neighbor. Whatever ground of glorying he may have he will find in himself, and not by a comparison with otliers. AVhatever glorying there may be will be grounded in a renewed heart, in fulfilling the law of love, and not in the delusive self-gloiying of one who fancies himself superior to others. Compare Paul's glorying in 2 Cor. 12 : 1-12. 5. This verse gives a confirmatory- reason for what he had said of a true glorying in regard to one's own work in contrast to a boastful glorying by a comparison with others. For every man shall bear his OAvn burden, For each one as a mattter of fact hav- ing examined himself, will carry his oivn personal load. As to his personal character, his private and public life, his imperfections, defects, infirmities, and obligations, he must stand for him- self. The load of these he must carry himself; be alone is responsible. The Greek term rendered burden here is difierent from that in ver. 2, which there means a heavy weight of cares, sorrows, and sins very oppressive. Here it is a load, which may be light (Matt, n : 30) or hcavy (Matt. 23 : 4), uScd primarily of the freight of a ship, the pack of a horse, a kit of a soldier, and figuratively liere, of sins and infirmities, of which one will become conscious as personally responsible upon self-ex- amination. These are of a kind which each must bear himself; but the bear- ing of those in ver. 2 may be shared in by others. Each one conscious of his own load Avill not be disposed to glory in respect to his neighbor. 6. The apostle passes from the obli- gation of Christian love in restoring the fallen, the mutual bearing of bur- dens, to their practical obligations to their teachers. According to the best text, this verse begins with But. As if Paul had said, lliave said that each one must hear his own load, but that does not exempt you from bearing one another's burdens (ver. 2), especially in regard to the temporal necessities of your teacliers in the gospel. But let him that is taught, referring es- pecially to the oral instruction of the teacher in the public assemblies and in private to individuals and families. The noun from this verb, "catechu- men" (one under instruction), was afterward applied to young converts under instruction. In the word, the gospel revelation (1 Peter 1 : 25). Com- municate unto him, share with him, 1:22 GALxVTIAXS [Ch. VI. communicato unto him that teacheth in all K<><><1 things. 7 Be not deceived ; God is not mocked : for i whatsoever a man soweth, that 8 shall he also reap. ^ For he that sow- eth to his flesh shall of the fiesh reap corruption ; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life ever- 9 lasting. And 'let us not be weary in share with him that teaches, in all 7 good things. Be not led astray ; God is not mocked ; for whatever a man 8 sows, that shall he also reap. Because he that .sows to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption ; but he that sows to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap 9 life eternal. And let us not be weary t Luke 16 : 23. A Job 4 : 8 ; Prov. 11 : 18 ; Rom. 8 : 13. I Mai. 1 : 13 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 58 ; 2 Thess. 3 : 13. tli.it teacheth in all grood things, temporal goods, such as food, clothing, money, and home. 8uch an applica- tion of " good things " is found in Luke 12 : 18, 19 ; 16 : 25 ; several times in the Septuagint (2 Sam. 7 : 28, etc.), and in the Epistle of Barnabas, g 19. This ac- cords also with the use of the verb "conununicate" in Rom. 12:13 and Phil. 4 : 15. It agrees with Paul's views of ministerial support as ex- pressed in 1 Cor. 9 : 11-14 ; 1 Tim. 5 : 17, 18. (Comp. Rom. 15 : 27 ; Phil. 4 : l-t-17. ) Some, with Meyer, refer "all good things" to everything morally good; let tiiem share with their teachers in all divine knowledge and in all that is spiritually good. But this thought is less pertinent here, and less suited to the connection and exhortation of ver. 10. It would, liowever, be true that those who shared with their teachers in carnal things would generally be in a state of mind to share also to a great yxtcnt in spiritual things. 7, With a warning the apostle en- forces especially generous liberality to- ward teachers, and generally all forms of well-doing commended in tlie pre- ceding verses of this chapter. This he does from an analogy drawn from the sowing and reaping in the outer world. Be not deceived, be not led into the error of tliinking, that you can neglect these duties, especially that mentioned in ver. 6, with impunity, (iod is not mocked, treated with a spirit of con- tempt, deceived witl\ prcteiices and a false sliow, or deluded by false promises. Men cannot impose on God by deceptive- ly holding l)ack a part of the j)rice which tliey have devoted to liim (Acts 5: 1-6). All Christians are stewards of wliat God lias entrusted to them, and to witlihold of their worldly ])ossessions that which he re<|uires is of t lie nature of mockery. Tor, as a i>roof <»f this, whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. This is true both in the natural and spiritual world. God's arrange- ments cannot be set aside. As certainly as seed in the ground, so the actions of men, including especially Christian liljcrality or the opposite, must develop corresponding results, 8. For, to illustrate this principle that a man shall reap what he sows, he that soweth to his flesh, with ref- erence to his flesh, natural desires and impulses, fleshly seed, fleshly ground, and fleshly purposes, shall of the flesh reap corruption, moral cor- ruption, eternal death, the opposite of eternal life. But he that soweth to the Spirit, with reference to the renewed nature, spiritual seed, spirit- ually prepared soil, and spiritual pur- po.ses, shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting. Eternal life begins now, but its full development and realiza- tion are in the future; "the harvest is the end of tlie world " (Johu 3 : 36 ; .Matt. 13:39). Two opposite kinds of seed, soil, and purpose appear to be brought into view. Literally, to his oicn flesh, indicating a selfish, unrenewed princi- ])le — l)eing controlled by the old man. The Spirit, the author, guide and sanc- tifier of the new man. "If we foster the flesh — the corrupt principles of our fallen state — we can have only * cor- ruption,' degradation, loathsomeness, spiritual death. If we cherish 'the Spirit,'— tlie liigher principles of the divinely renewed state, we shall cer- tainly attain in due season, at tlie ap- pointed harvest time, 'life' — purity, vigor, iov — 'everlasting'" ("Annot. Par. Bible"). 9. A caution and an encouragement. Paul discontinues tlie figure of .«;owing in the first clause, but retains that of reaping in the second. And let us not be weary, act bailh/, lose courar/e, fluff, in Avell doing. The doing of good relates not to a few acts, but to a Ch. VL] GALATIAXS 123 well doing : ™ for in due season we shall 10 reap, °if we faint not. "As we have therefore opportunity, Plet us do good unto all men, especially unto them who are of ^ the household of faith. Postscript. Concluding exhortations. 11 Ye see how large a ietter 'I have written unto you with mine own hand. in well doing ; for in due season we 10 shall reap, if we faint not. So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all, but especially to those who are of the household of the faith. 11 See with what large letters I have written to you with my own hand. p Luke 6 : 35 ; 1 Thess. 5 : 15 n Isa. 40 : 30, 31 ; see refs. Matt. 10 . 22. Titus 3:8. q Eph. 2 : 19 ; Heb. 3 : 6. o Eccl. 9 ; 10 ; John 9 : 4. r See Rom. 16 : 22 ; 1 Cor. 16 habitual doing till the harvest time, to the full realization of eternal life. Paul would not have them lose heart in view of that which might be but dimly seen by faith in the future (James 5 : ", 8). For in due season we shall reap, if we faint not, if we do not relax our efforts and become discouraged. The due season is the proper, regular, and God's appointed time of harvest (i Tim. 6 : 15). The reaping and the harvest are sure to come. We may, however, have the foretaste in this life, the first fruits of the great harvest hereafter (1 Cor. 15: 58). 10. A conclusion of what precedes. As we have therefore oppor- tunity. Accordingly then, as we have a time, or, season, for sowing, for doing good, hence an opportunity, let us do good unto al[ men, more exactly, ict us work that which is good toward all in philanthropy and beneficence. The word icork appears to express a noble, diligent doing, the putting forth of strength in helping others, and in min- istering to the true good of all. Chris- tian beneficence is universal. A con- trast to the law. Opportunity begets obligation. But especially unto them who are of the household of faith. Believers are here con- ceived of as a family, of which faith is a characteristic, and by which they are invited into one household. They are spoken of elsewhere as the house- hold of God ( F;ph. 2 : 19 : comp. 1 Tim. 3:15; 1 Peter 2 : 5). Thosc who are one in faith and hope should be especially united in love. Such should mutually be special objects of needed beneficence. Thus the apostle fittingly and beauti- fully concludes the main" portion of this Epistle. What remains is but a brief summary, with personal references aiul a benediction. 11-18. Postscript, in which the apostle gives the true ground of glory- ing, deprecates further trouble, and con- cludes with a benediction. See analy- sis at the beginning of the chapter. 11. Paul calls attention to his own handwriting. Instead of Ye see how large a letter I have written unto you with my own hand, translate literally. See with large letters I wrote you with my own hand. It is evident from this that Paul does not refer to the length of the Epistle, but to the size of the ; characters (the letters of the alphabet) I he wrote. (Comp. 2 Tliess. 3 : 17). " So I I write," so I am accustomed to form my letters. There is no evidence that the j letters were ill-formed. " An analogy is found inthe bold signature of John llan- i cock to the Declaration of Independ- lence" (Prof. H. E. Jacobs, note in I Meyer). Some see in the large hand- writing of Paul an evidence of some infirmity, as weak eyesight (^ : is). / I irrote, is a Greek idiom in which the writer transports himself to the time when the letter would be read. Paul j was accustomed, at least in his letters I to the churches, to employ an anianu- ! ensis to whom he dictated the body of his Epistle (Rom. 16 : 22)^ adding in his own handwriting the closing verses, which was a token or mark of identification (2 Thess. 3 : 17; 1 Cor. 16 : 21 ; Col. 4 : 18), showing the Epistle to be genuine (2 Thess. 2:2). Many, therefore, with Meyer and Lightfoot limit Paul's handwriting here to this postscript, and regard the aorist, I wrote, as an epistolary aorist, and equivalent to / tvrite, " See with large letters I write," etc. But in Philemon 19 this tense of the verb evidently refers to his writing the whole Epistle. Alford holds that Paul also wrote the pastoral Epistles with his own hand. In 1 Cor. 5 : 9 Paul uses this j tense with reference to a former Epistle, I and in 1 Cor. 9 : 15 he refers to what he 124 GALAT1A^S [Cn. YL 12 As many as desire to make a fair show ill the flesh, "they constrain you to be circumcised ; only lest tliey sliould suf- fer persecution for the cross of Christ. 13 »For neither tliey themselves who are circumcised keep the law ; but desire to liave vou circumcised, that they may 11 glorv i"n your llesh. "But God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our 12 As many as wish to make a fair show in the flesh, these constrain you to be circumcised; only in order that they may not suffer persecution for the cross 13 of Christ. For neither do they them- selves who are circumcised keep the law ; t)Ut they wish that ye should be circumcised, that they may glory in 14 your flesh. But far be it from me to glory, except in the cross of our Lord 2:3; Acts 15 : 1. t Matt. 23 ; 2-5, 23-25. Isa. 45 : 24, 25 ; 1 Cor. 2:2; Phil. 3 : 3, 7-11. had written in the first part of tlie ! chapter. It seems to me most natural also to regard I'aul here as referring to the whole Epistle. It is largely per- sonal, a vindication of his apostleship and apostolic preaching, written with intense earnestness and rapidity, and hence would more likely be w ritten by himself. This is the more natural meaning of "I wx-ote," unless there is evidence from the context to the con- trary. So also Ellicott, Wordsworth, Ct. B. Stevens, and others. To have written the entire Epistle was an evi- dence of his intense feelings, his deep interest, and his strong atifection for them. 12. Paul warns them again, in this and the next verse, against false teach- ! ers, summing up their selfish spirit and ' aims. As many as desire, or, ivish, to make a fair show in the flesh, in outward observances, to which cir- cumcision belongs, they constrain you, they are compelling yon, trying to compel you to be circumcised, by making it morally obligatory. (Comp. 2 : H.) On the meaning of /« //*^^esA, as re- ferring to external observances as op- posed to spiritual life and service, com- pare Phil. 3 : 3, 4 ; Rom. 2 : 28, 29. They are wishing to appear zealous in relig- ion ; l)ut their motive is selfish and liypo- critical. They do it, not from convic- tions of duty, nor from great devotion to the Jewish law, but only lest they should suflTer persecution, or, only that they may not suffer persecution for, or, because of, the cross of Christ, for preaching the doctrini\s of the cross and that the death of Christ is alone sufficient for salvation. If they thus believed and preached they would incur the hatred and persecution of the •lews. Put they could avoid this by making a display of their devotion to the Jewish law, and insisting on the necessity of circumcision. 13. For, in proof that their object is to escape persecution, note the fact that not even do they themselves who are circumcised, who advo- cate and practise circumcision, keep the laAV, they fall short of its moral requirements. They are chiefly con- cerned about an outward rite, rather than the spiritual demands of the law. The fact that they depended in some sense on Christ, implied that they did not keep the law perfectly. Some pre- fer another reading, those who have been circumcised. But the present tense is the better supported by textual author- ities, and is to be preferred. The refer- ence is to the Judaizing leaders, for they are the ones meant in the preced- ing verse and in the last clause of this verse. Not because they keep the law in all its parts themselves, but they desire to have you (emphatic) cir- cumcised, in order that they may glory in your (emphatic) flesh, over your submission to an outward, fleshly rite. They could boast of how many of you among the Gentiles they had made converts to Judaism. By thus manifesting a zeal for the Jewish re- ligion they would gain favor among the Jews and escape persecution from them. 14. But their glorying in the flesh was repugnant to the apostle. On the contrary he gloried in what they were trying to shun, the cross of Christ. But God forbid that I should glory. The personal pronoun is em- phatic. G'od forbid, rather. Let it not be once thought of, or. Far be it. (See note on 2 : 17.) Jjut, for my part, far be it from me that I should glory save in the cross, the sacrificial and aton- ing death of Christ. His boast was in Christ crucified. He rejected every other ground of boasting. (Comp. i Cor. 2:2.) By whom. Some translate ^y which, referring to the cross, not a lit- Cii. VI.] GALATIAXS 125 Lord Jesus Christ, bj- whom the world is s crucified unto me, and I unto the 15 world. For yin Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but ^a new creature. Vo And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon » the Israel of God. Jesus Christ, through whom the world is crucified to me. and I to the world. 15 For in Jesus Christ neither is circum- cision anything, nor uncircumcision, 16 but a new creation. And as many as shall walk by this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and on the Israel of God. X See refs. 2 : 20 ; 1 John 5 : -t, 5. 2/5:6; Col. 3 : 11. a 3 : 7, 9, 29 ; Rom. 2 : 28, 29 ; 4 rc'fs. 2 Cor. 5 : 17. eral cross, but the atoning death of Christ. Both constructions are gram- matical, and both yield substantially the same meaning. But Christ is the nearest antecedent, and the full title, Our Lord Jesus Christ, brings into view the glory and grandeur of the cruci- fied One as prominent in the apostle's mind. It seems therefore more natural to refer to Christ, and translate, By whom. Both the crucified Christ and the glori- fied Christ fill his mind. Both were essential to the efficacy of his atoning death, and to the effectual crucifixion of the world to him and himself to the world. (Comp. 1 Cor. 15 : 14, 17.) BlJ whom the world, tlie whole circle of earthly things, its riches, treasures, gains, and pleasures, this outward and transient sphere of things of which mere ritual observances are a part, is crucified unto me, like one nailed to the cross, dying a lingering, igno- minious death, and I, in like manner, unto the world. In the crucified Christ he saw God's love and sacrifice. Through an apprehension of tliese, he was raised above worldly forms and relations and became as one who had suttered a violent death in the Avorld. Surely nothing remained in the world to glorj^ in, if the world was thus dead to him and he to the world, (comp. 2 : 19, 20; Col. 2 : 13, 14, 20.) 15. This verse explains and confirms the closing statement of the preceding verse, " By whom the world is crucified unto me," etc. This deadness of the world to me and of me to the world is l)ut a necessary condition and outcome of true spiritual religion, of union with Christ. For in Christ Jesus, in that spiritual union with him, neither circumcision availeth anything, better, is anything, nor uncircum- cision, both are a matter of no im- portance, so far as being in Christ and so far as salvation is concerned ; but the essential thing is a ncAV creature, or more general, a new creation, sucli as is effected in the heart by the Holy Spirit. (Comp. 2 Cor. 5 : 17.) " If any man be in Christ he is a new creature " (Eph. 2 : 10). " We are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus" (Eph. 4:24). "The new man is created according to God in righteousness and true holi- ness." On the word creation see note on Rom. 8 : 19. It was not outward circumcision, but the inward, that of the heart, that Paul cared about (Rom. 3 : 28. 29; comp. 5 : 6 ami 1 Cor. 7 : 19), Most editors omit the words in Christ Jesus, as an interpolation from 5 : 6. But the manuscript authority and the internal evidence are so strong for their retention that it seems best not to omit them. 16. A practical statement and wish growing out of the great truth enunci- ated in the preceding verse. And as many as Avalk, or according to the best supported text, as shall walk, con- tinuing to do so and extending on to the end of the gospel dispensation. Ac- cording to this rule, by this maxim or principle, stated in ver. 15, that the new life is the all-important thing, and that the mere outward observance of circumcision is nothing in gaining ac- ceptance with God and securing salva- tion. The word rendered rule is that from which our word canon is derived, and primarily meant a straight stick, a measuring rod, or rule, or a carpenter's line. It thus came to be used of an;/ rule or principle of judging, living, and acting. Peace from God and with God, in their own souls and with men, through him who is " our peace " (Eph. 2 : 14-17), bc ou thcui, aud mercy, as needed by sinners. An in- vocation, ^[ay it be, and it shall be on such. And upon the Israel of God, the true Israel, whether Jews or Gentiles, who are his true people 120 GALATIANS [Ch. VI. 17 From hencoforth let no man trouble me : for •>! Wear in my l>ody the marks of the Lord Jcj-us. 18 Brethren. -^ the graceof our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. Amen. 17 Henceforth let no one trouble me: for I bear in my body the brand-marks of Jesus. 18 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit, brethren. Amen. b 2 Cor. 4 : 10 ; 11 : 23 ; Col. 1 : 24. ! 2 Tim. 4 : 22 ; Philemon 25. through faith in .lesus Christ (R : 29). Yet in closing tiiis phrase, the apostle very prol)al»ly had more especially in mind his converted countrymen, toward whom he ever felt the warmest and deepest interest (Pi'ii- » =3). 17. Paul has completed the di.seus- sion of the points at issue connected with his apostolic authority and preach- ing. His last word has been spoken. From henceforth let no man tronble nie, as had been done by false teachers, in calling in question my apostleship and in perverting my go.spel. Let controversy cease. (Comp. 1 Cor. u : 88.) For I (emphatic in con- trast to tho.se troublers) bear, or, carry, in my body the marks, the marls brionled, or, pioictured, on my body, of j the Lord Jesus, according to the best text, 0/ Jesus. Unlike these false I teachers,! can point to the marks of persecution I have endured as evidences of being a servajit of Christ and of my fellowship with him in suffering and spirit. The sears and marks of perse- cution endured for Christ's sake were the badge of faithful and honorable service. (See 2 Cor. 1:5; 4 : 10 : 11 : 2,^-27; 2 Tim. 3:12.) The plirascology appeai-s to have been chosen in reference to the I practice of branding, usually on the i hands or on the forehead, slaves to in- I dicate their owner, soldiers to indicate [ their commander, worshipers to indi- I cate their god. "A 'sacred slave' is mentioned in a Galatian inscription" ( I^kuitfoot). Such marks were, in- deed, proofs of Paul's sincerity and devotion to Christ and ought to relieve him of any further annoyance. They also indicated the fact of his fellowship of Christ's sutl'eriiigs, of bearing about in his liody the dying of the Lord .lesus, and tilling up in his flesh the atilictions «»f Christ (2 Cor. 4 : 10; Col. 1 : 24). Thcse marks also suggest a striking contrast to tlie mark of circumcision, in which the .ludaizers gloried (ver. i3). IH. Tilt' final benediction. That in v»T. 1(1 was general; this is particular, upon his (Julatiau brethren. He began his p]pistle with admonition and re- buke; he closes it with words of bless- ing and an appellation of love. The grace, the saving /a wr, of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit, in which the power of divine grace operates by the Holy Spirit. Breth- ren, in the best text, is the last word of the Epistle. Its unusual position makes it emphatic. " The severity of the whole Epistle is thus softened" (Bengel). With this affectionate close comes the ratifying Amen, so it is, and so let it be (Rom. 1 : 25). The subscri lotion, appended to the Common version, "Unto the Galatians written from Rome," is incorrect and of uncer- tain, but later date. See Introduction. Practical Remarks. 1. Every Christian owes a duty to his Christian brother, especially to his erring brother (ver. 1, 2 ; 1 John 5 : 16 ; Matt. 18 : 15). 2. Our own exposure to temptation and liability to fall thereby .sliould make us kind to the erring and earnest and pray- erful in seeking their restoration (ver. 1, 2 ; 1 Cor. 10 : 12, 13 ; 2 Cor. 2:5-8; 1 Thess. 2 : 7-9). 3. Christians have a right to expect the prayers, sympathies, and help of tlieir brethren in their anxieties, sorrows, and infirmities (ver. 2; 5 : 13-15; Rom. 15 : 1- 6). 4. The self-conceited are self-deceived ; they commit their greatest fraud on them- selves (ver. 3 ; Isa. 5 : 21). 5. Self-examination and the approval of God's word will bring peace of conscience and joy in the con.sciousness of God's favor (ver. 4 : 1 Cor. 9 : 27 ; 2 Cor. 13 : 5). 6. The ultimate responsibility of every man's life rests upon himself (ver. 5 ; Rom. 14 :12; 1 Cor. 3 : 13-15). 7. He who is taught in the word owes to his pastor and teacher, as a servant of the Lord for him, a share of his earnings, of his synii)athies, and his co-operation (ver. G ; i Cor. 9 : 11-14 ; 2 Cor. 1 : 3-7). Ch. VI.] GALATIANS 127 8. Our present life is the seedtime for eternity (ver. 7, 8 ; 2 Cor. 9:6). 9. Tlie future condition of men will cor- respond with their present character and conduct (ver. 8 ; Job 4:8; Prov. 22 : 8). 10. Nothing is more certain than the blessed rewards of well-doing (ver. 9; 1 Cor. 15 :58; 1 Peter 4 : 19). 11. Under the gospel, doing good to all is not a matter of convenience, nor of mere personal interest, but of opportunity and of consequent obligation (ver. 10; Matt. 25:41-45). 12. Glorying in externals, seeking out- ward display and popular applause, re- fraining from proclaiming the truth as it is in Jesus, and hypocrisy, are marks of a false teacher (ver. 12, 13; Phil. 3:2-4; Rom. 2: 17-24). 13. The doctrines of the cross are cen- tral and essential to the gospel. " We learn more concerning the character of God, the evil of sin, and the way of sal- vation from the cross than from all other sources" (Pendleton; Ver. 14; John 3 : 14, 15; ICor. 1:2:3, 24). 14. Ritualism contravenes the spirit of the gospel (ver. 14, 15 ; 2 Cor. 3:6). 15. The new birth is a new creation (ver. 19 ; John 3:6; Heb. 8 : 10 ; Col. 3 : 10). 16. The doctrines of the cross are a sure guide to salvation, and they furnish a measuring line for our faith and a straight patn for our practice (ver. 16 ; Phil. 2:5: 1 Peter 4 : 1, 2: 2 Peter 1 : 16). 17. Let a life of devotion and of self- sacrifice for the Lord Jesus and the good of others be the marks of our affection to him (ver. 17 ; Acts 20 : 35). " This was the central thought of the life of Dr. M. B. Anderson. How often has he pointed out to me these sacred words, ' The Lamb slain before the foundation of the world,' and indicated to me in his vigorous way that the universe was built on the principle of self-sacrifice, that it is God's eternal plan that no great or useful work for humanity shall be done except through pain and suffering, and that it is a part of the Chris- tian life to live over again the life of Christ. Sucli were his dying thoughts, as indicated in the letter which he dictated to me the Thursday before his death : ' It has been the purpose of my life to live as far as I might for others, like my divine Master to give myself for them, and so far to renew in myself that perfect life. I want you to preach to the people some day on this text, "Bearing about in my body the dying of the Lord Jesus." It has been in my thought most of my life ' " (F. L. Anderson, in " Memoir of Dr. Mar- tin B. Anderson," p. 198). NOTE. The Twentieth Century New Testament, in Gal. 2 : 16 and else- wiiere, renders dikaiiw {justify) "to stand right with God." It is difficult to find in English an exact equivalent to this word. Dr. Lyman Abbott ren- ders it by the now obsolete term righten. But neither of the above renderings seems fully to express the Pauline meaning. The word rendered justify in the New Testament is connected through . the Septuagint version with the Hebrew verb which means " to be righteous," and generally in the Old Testament means, positively "to de- clare or pronounce righteous" or nega- tively "to declare or pronounce guilt- less," and therefore acceptable to God. Paul uses "justify" as a forensic term in a judicial sense, to declare one right- eous and treat him as such. Through faith in Christ and upon faith (Piiii- a : u) God treats the sinner as if he were righteous — righteousness is reckoned to his account. And so through Christ he stands righteous before God. (see uote ou Rom. 1 : 17, i.. 33 f. ) A free and pop- ular reudex'ing of the New Testament in modern English is helpful in many ways, but it is liable to partake of the nature of an interpretation, probably a less preferable one, rather than a trans- lation, and to depart too far from the literal rendering on which it is founded. THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS Apostolic salutation and praise to God for the blessings of redemption. 1 a PAUL, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, ''to the saints which are at Ephesus, <=aud to the faithful in 2 Christ Jesus: "^ Grace be to you, and 1 PAUL, an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, to the saints who are iu Ephesus, and the faithful 2 in Christ Jesus: Grace to you, and a See refs. 2 Cor. 1 : 1. See refs. Rom. 1 : 7. c 6 : 21 ; Col. 1 : 2. d G 1 :3. Title. The earHest title is, To the Ephesian3. The longer one is implied iu the first verse. But, whether longer or shorter, every known manuscrii^t des- ignates the Ephesians in its title. This indicates at least an early tradition and belief as to the readers addressed. CHAPTER I. After a salutation in verses 1 and 2, the apostle praises God for the election, redemption, and unity in Christ of the saints, both Jews and Gentiles (ver. 3- 11) ; and giving special thanks for the faith of his readers, he prays for their more perfect enlightenment in these great and glorious truths of salvation (ver. 15-23). 1, 2. Salutation. Paul's usual greeting and benediction. 1. The greeting. Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by, better, through, the will of God. See note on Gal. 1 : 1, and contrast it with this. There lie asserts and defends his apostleship in view of his opposers ; here he sim- ply presents it as a fact, which would be accepted and unquestioned by his readers. He was an apostle through the loill of God, since it was God's de- sign from his birth (Gai. i: is, is), and the gospel was revealed to him through revelation of Jesus Christ (oai. i : 12 ; Acts 9 : 15). To the saints, to the holy, or, consecrated ones, to those separated from the world and set apart to holiness and ' God's service, which are at Ephe- : sus, and to the faithful, or, to belisv- ' I ers, in Christ Jesus, 'in Jesus the 3Ies- siah, the Anointed One, who had been foretold by prophets of old. Believers are in union with and abiding in him (1 Cor. 6 : 17). Suiuts and believers are closely connected, presenting Chris- tians under diflerent aspects. They are persons consecrated to God and re- posing faith in Jesus Christ. As such they are trusty, and the word may be rendered faithful^ but the idea of their exercising faith in Jesus Christ must not be lost sight of. At Ephesus. These words are omit- ted in the two oldest manuscripts, but are found in all other known manu- scripts (in their uncorrected form) and versions. They are bracketed by Tischendorf, and by Westcottand Hort, but are strongly defended, as the true original reading, by Meyer, Ellicott, and others. Some regard this Epistle as the letter to the Laodiceans alluded to in Col. 4 : 16 ; and others that it was a cir- cular letter, with a blank space left here to be filled with the name of any church where it was to be publicly read. But these suppositions are not substan- tiated. Very likely, however, while this Epistle was intended primarily for the Ephesian church, it was also to be read in some other churches in the prov- ince of Asia. Ephesus was colonized mainly from Athens, and its social life was colored by both Grecian and Asiatic influences. It also had a considerable Jewish popu- lation. It was the capital of the Ro- man provinces of Asia. It was a great 129 130 EPHESIANS [Ch. I. peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ. 3 'Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all fspiritual blessings inheav- 4 enly places 8iu Christ: according as peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heav- 4 enly realms in Christ ; as he chose us /Ver. 5, 7, 11, 13, U. g John U : 6 ; 15 : 4, 5. harbor and eraporiuni, and though some miles inland, it was connected by a lake and the river Cayster with the sea. It was noted for the temple of Diana (Artemis) and the theatre. (See Acts 19 : 1, 24, 27, 2i», and notes.) 2. The opening benediction. The same as in Gal. 1 : 3, on which see note. So also at the beginning of all of Paul's Epistles, showing the importance of this benediction. Notice how he brings into prominence God as the Father of l)elievers, and Christ as their Lord, and their spiritual sonship. This verse is ill harmony with the doctrinal dis- cussion that follows. 3-14. Praise to God in view of the election, redemption, and unity of the christian brother- HOOD IN Christ, both of Jews and Gentiles. These verses form a single sentence and are a most wonderful con- densation of the doctrines of the gospel. Every clause contains an important truth or doctrine. It seems quite im- possible to briefly summarize the pas- sage. The apostle, however, expresses his gratitude to God for the blessings of salvation, in that he had chosen us in I Christ unto holiness, and predetermined us as sons adopted through Ciirist, to the glorj' of his grace ( ^er. 3-6) ; in whom also we have redemption, the forgive- ! ness of sins, and wisdom in making known to us the mysteries of his will in uniting all in Christ (ver. 8-io) ; through wlnmi Jews and Gentiles, having re- ceived the word of truth, now receive the Spirit as a pledge of our future in- heritance (ver. ii-u). The three ascrip- tions to God's glory accord with the spirit of praise in the whole pas.sage (ver. 6, 12, u). Jt is almost a sublime poem. 3. The apostle begins with praise to God for his abundant l)le.ssings bestowed ! upon his people. Blessed^ or, praised, \ be the God and Father of our ' Lord Jesus Christ, expressing the two-fold relation to Christ in his re- demptive and mediatorial work (i Tim. 2 -. I 5 ; Heb. 3:1; conip. Rom. 15 : 6). Uniting God ' and Father closely, and limiting both by of, seems to bring out the most nat- ural meaning of the phrase. The word j rendered blessed occurs eight times else- where in the New Testament and is ' used invariably with reference to God. j Infinitely above all otliers can absolute praise be ascribed to him. Who hath blessed us, rather, icho blessed us, \ referring to the purpose of the Father toward the saints as graciously com- pleted in redemption. This accords with what follows. ^^ His blessings to t where- in lie hath made us accei)ted in Pthe beloved. sin whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to 'the riches of his his grace, which he graciously be- 7 stowed on us in the beloved ; in whom we have the redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the wealth of his grace, 0 Rom. 3 : 22-26. p Isa. 42 : 1. o Acts 20 : 28 ; Rom. 3 : 24. r 3 : 16 ; Rom. 3 : 24. verse shows, his benevolence, as well as his sovereignty. 0. The apostle throws in an ex- pression of praise to God's grace, to which must be ascril)cd the divine se- lection of sinners for salvation and son- ship. To the praise of the ?lory, the glorious excellence and splendor, of his grace. This is consistent with what is said of love a])Ove, for grace is inseparable from love; love exhibited toward undeserving and helpless sin- ners is grace. In other words, grace is the unmerited exercise of God's love to- ward his creatures (Rom. a : 21-24). No- tice that in verses 12 and 14 the ascrip- tion of praise is general, to God's glory ,^ which, however, includes the glory of his grace. From this point to the end of verse 14, the sentence proceeds by means of relative clauses, each suggested by a preceding noun (ver. 7, 8, 11, is, u). This shows how full Paul's mind was with the great truths which he puts forth without arranging them into separate sentences. Wherein, or according to the preferable reading, which, referring to grace. Hath should be omitted. The verb rendered, Made us ac- cepted means to render acceptable, and also to confer grace. The latter is the sense in Luke 1 : 28, "highly fa- vored," compassed with grace. The word occurs elsewhere in the Xew Tes- tament only here; and the same sense seems to be demanded, as Alford has shown by the tense of the verb, " re- ferring to an act of God once past in Christ, not to an abiding state which he had brought about in us." Paul's gcni'ral use of the word grace, and the context, also favor this view. Accord- ingly the Bible Union and the Revised versions translate, which he freely, or, (jracioushj, bestowed on us in the be- lored. As a certain result, however, of this grace, we become and are made accepted in Christ. The beloved, a l)eautiful designation of the Son, in whom the Father is well pleased (Matt. 3 : n ; 17 : 5 ; Isa. 42 : 1 ). Christ in his es- sential being is infinitely lovely, the brightness of the Father's glory (Heb. i : 3), the special object of that fatherly love which embraces us also (Joim i : 12. 14; Col. 1 : 13). It is not merely through, nor on account of' but in the beloved. God beheld us, though sinners and un- lovely, in Him who is altogether lovely, to be renewed by his Spirit^ washed witli his blood, clothed in his righteous- ness. 7. The apostle comes down to our experience of salvation on the ground of Christ's death. In whom, the Be- loved (last verse), we have, as an actual, present experience, the re- demption, long expected but now known and enjoyed, through his blood, indicating his death, given as a ransom (Man. 20 : 28; l Tim. 2:6). Rc- demjJtion means a release or a deliver- ance effected by the payment of a ran- som. See fuller discussion in Rom. 3 : 24. Through his 6/ooc/, his life given up unto death as a ransom-price (Acts 20 : 28). All expressions of this kind in the Xew Testament, in connection with Christ and his work, have reference to or imply atonement, whether they are connected with the figure of expiation from guilt, a ransom paid, or a cove- nant ratified. In apposition and explanatory of the preceding clause : The forgiveness, the pardon, the putting away as if not committed, of sins, rather, of our trespasses, according to the riches, the wealth, the great abundance, the fullness, of his grace. Thus Paul comes back to that grace which was the object of his praise in ver. (J. "If our redemption is proportionate to the riches of his grace it will certainly be complete" (BoiSE). The word trans- lated trespasses, includes any deviation from truth and uprightness (Hom. 4 : 25 ; 5 : 15) ; and in Rom. 5 : 20 it is used synonymously with the generic word sin. '' It differs from it in figure not in force" (Thayer's "A: T. Gr. Lex."]. Ch. L] EFHESIANS 133 8 grace; wherein he hath abounded to- ward us Mn all wisdom and prudence ; 9 t having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure "which he hath pur- 10 posed in himself : that in the dispensa- tion of ^ the fulness of times y he might 8 which he made to abound toward us in all wisdom and understanding ; 9 making known to us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure 10 which he purposed in himself, in re- spect to the administration of the full- ness of seasons, to sum up all things in Rom. 11 : 33. t Matt. 13 : 11 ; Rom. 16 ; 25. u Ver. 11 ; 2 Tim. 1 : i J/ 3 : 15 ; John 10 : 16. X- Gal. i : i. So, also, similarly, Cremer's "Lexicon of New Testament." Thus it includes not only actual individual sins, but also all sins, including unknown and unintentional sins (Gai. 6 : i) and innate sinfulness (Coi. 2 : is). 8, Paul sees the riches of grace, not stopping with redemption and the for- giveness of sins, but abounding toward man and in man. Wherein he hath abounded toward us, rather, Which grace he hath made to abound, or, overflow toward, literally, into us. The idea is that of grace entering into our hearts, causing them to overflow in his gifts and blessings. In all wisdom and prudence ; not the wisdom and prudence that God abun- dantly exercises, but, as demanded by the next verse, that whicli he gave to the saints to exercise. Wisdom is the more comprehensive word with refer- ence to the knowledge of whatever per- tains to our eternal warfare. Prudence is more special, the sagacious exercise of the mind in details, in connection with wisdom. It is spiritual insight. EUicott renders it discernment, or intel- ligence, and the Improved version, understanding. The word occurs else- where only in Luke 1 : 17, where it is rendered "