■ IRDeAl.1. at SON NOWTMAMPTOIir 5^ tl. IxtaWI^-^^^ 0 NARRATIVE OP THE MURDER OF THE LATB Rev. J. WATERHOUSE ; WITH A FULL REPORT OF THE TRIAL, CONPESSION, 6e EXECUTION OF THE MURDERER ; AND A BIOGRAPHY and ANECDOTES Of Mr. Waterhouse and of Slade. EMBELLISHED WITH a Vit\s> of tf)t mettorp l^omt $^ dt^nx^p GROUND PLAN OF THE PREMISES, AND A PORTRAIT OF SLADE. You have undone a man of fourscore years, That thought to fill his grave in quiet. And now The hangman must put on thy shroud, and lay thee Where no priest shovels in dust. — Peace to his soul, if God's pleasure be I Forbear to judge, for we are sinners all. Shakspearb. HUNTINGDON : PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY T. LOVELL i •OLD BY BALDWIN, CRADOCK AND JOY. LONP0!<* AND BY ALL BOOKSELLERS. 1827. ENTERED AT STATIONERS* HALL, J iii CONTENTS. Pag« Description of tbe village and church of Little Stiikelty . ^ Murder of Mr Waterhouse . . . 9 The Inquest .... 12 Adjourned Inquest . • . .20 Apprehension of Slade . • -23 Examination of Heddings • . .27 Examination of Lansdale Wright • • 32 Slade fully committed for trial . . .33 Sketch of the Life of Mr Waterhouse . ibid. Sketch of the Life of Joshua Slade • • 46 The Assizes . • • . 56 First Day of the Assizes • • .57 Second Day— Trial of Slade • . .60 Condemnation of Slade • , • 86 Trial of Beddings . . . 87 Slade respited • • . 90 Confession of Slade • . 92 Conduct and conversation of the Prisoner . lOO The Execution and Dissection of Slade • .106 Concluding Remarks . 112 LIST OF THE PLATES. View of the Rectory-house and premisei • To face Title Ground Plan of the House and Premisef • 5 Portrait of Joshua Slade « • • i(( fii. * a- ft 2 ^ D3 ^• _ ST ^ <^ = W 5' 5^ pr CO ST o ^ I I S O CD a ^ > c r 9 cr o a. o s a O w 5* I to I i i is ARRATIVE, The crime of murder is happily so rare in England> and the character of the English nation so little tarnished with cruelty, that we can scarcely wonder at the extra- ordinary interest which has been manifested on the sub- ject of the l^te atrocious outrage, perpetrated in this county. So violent an infringement of the personal security and moral feelings of the people committed, too, under circumstances of almost unexampled barbarity, €ind in the open light of day, was eminently calculated to awaken public attention 5 while the mystery in which the case was, for a time, enveloped, tended materially to heighten the public anxiety and consternation. l\y means of that powerful engine of publicity, the Press, the tidings of Mr. Waterhouse^s murder, with all its painful and harrowing details, were spread far and wide, and every consideration, both from home and abroad, called upon our local authorities to exert their utmost vigilance for the discovery of the offender. Their efforts have at length been crowned with success : the murdered has been apprehended, tried, convicted, and executed 5-^ and thus the last eventful scene of this frii^htful tragedy 6 has terminated as it ought, in a due atonenaent made to public justice. It may be useful, however, to recal the circumstances which so lately agitated us ; and to pre- serve, in regular form and order, the memory of a trans- action which can only be parallelled in atrocity by the kindred horrors of the murder of Weare. Little Stukeley — ^the spot with which our narrative is chiefly connected — is a small village situated in a hol- low betwixt two hills, about three miles from Hunting- don. It lies to the right of the Great North Road, and, in 1821, contained 385 inhabitants. The number of houses was 52 5 seventy-one families were returned as being employed in agriculture and sixteen in handicrafts. The ancient name of the place was Stivecle, and we read of a Sir Nicholas de Styvecle, Knt. who resided here in the lime of Richard II., and purchased the manor of Priestly, in this parish. About the time of the Re- formation, the manor of Stukeley passed into the hands of John Stone, Serjeant at Law 5 who purchased the advowson of Sir Oliver Cromwell (uncle to the Protec- lor), and in his family it continued till the reign of Charles II. It afterwards became the property of Sir Robert Barnard 5 and from him descended to the pre- sent proprietor, Lady O. B. Sparrow. The church of Little Stukeley, though in rather a dilapidated state, is a handsome Gothic pile. It stands on a considerable eminence, about a bow shot from the North Road, and commands a fine view of the village, which slopes along the hill beneath. From an inscrip- tion over the south porch, it appears that the church was enlarged or repaired in the year 1652. On one of the battlements above the upper south window of the tower is the date 1659 — most probably the year in which the tower was completed. Another inscription over the door of the North isle informs us that the church was repaired in 1 673, when John Bigg, Esq. and John King were Churchwardens. The porch opens under a Gothic arch of the Tudor style, and contains the remains of a broken piscina. The chancel was anciently separated from the body of the church by a Rood-loft, or shrine for the reception of images, the indications of which may be plainly seen. These remains of antiquity would seem to assign the date of the building to a period anterior to the Reformation^ The external appearance of the sacred edifice is ren- dered more striking and pictures(|ue from a considerable part of it being covered with ivy, the roots of which spring from the wall, and are at least three feet from the ground. The interior presents little worthy of notice, excepting some monumental inscriptions to the memory of part of the family of Mr. Justice Bayley— •that upright and truly constitutional Judge having spent the earlier portion of his valuable existence in the village of Stukeley. Here slumber the ashes of his father, John Bayley, Esq. who died in 1790, at the age of 54 : of his brother, the Rev. Daniel Bayley, formerly vicar of Madingley in the county of Cambridge j and of his mother, Mrs. Sarah Bayley, grand-daughter of Dr. White Kennett, formerly Bishop of Peterborough, who died in 1801, aged 68. The two following inscriptions bear evident marks of the pen of the venerable Judge : they are engraved on B 2 8 handsome marble tablets, by Westmacott^ placed against the houthem wall : — lu the body of this Church lie the remains of LUCY, The second and much-lamented daughter of The Honourable Mr. Justice aud Lady Bay ley, Who died the 29th day of July 1821, In the 29th year of her age. She was laeek, but animated ; affectionate and conciliating. Intelligent without pride, Well-informed without ostentation ; Pious, unaffected, religious, and resigned. Regretted much by all who knew her. But most by those who knew her best. In the same vault with her Niece lie Also the remains of Lucy Bayley, sister To the Honourable Mr. Justice Bayley; A Lady of exemplary life and character ; who after Having practised, during a residence of 41 years In this village, unbounded kindness and hospitality "^o her relatives and friends ; and a constant and Unwearied charity to her poorer neighbours, Bi^ed on the 29th day of December 1823^, In the 63d year of her pilgrimage. Beloved, respected, and regretted* By who. Hue w her. Oh the back ol the Clerk's desk i& afeed a memo-* random in the hapd-writing Mr. Waterhouso, and highly characteristic of the unfortunate gentleman. It is as follows :— • In the Morning Service — While the Epistle is reading, the congregation are to sit down 5 and to stand up while the Gospel is reading. " In the Churching of IVomen — The congregation are to stand up while the Psalm is reading. In the Burial Service — The congregation are to stand up while the Psalm is reading *' The inhabitants of Little Stukeley are chiefly employed in agriculture ; and hence it is the more extraordinary 9 that in a place presenting so few temptations to vice, where men do not congregate together in masses, and spread the moral contagion from one to another, with a sort of electric force and rapidity, that a murder should have been committed, exhibiting the most revoltin^^ features of depravity 5 and that a gang of ruffians should have existed, almost whose sole occupation was rapine and plunder. On the morning of Tuesday the 3d of July, 1S27, an alarm was spread through the village of Little Stukeley, that their rector, the Rev. Joshua Waterhouse, wtio had been incumbent of the parish for about fourteen years, and was in the eii^hty-first year of his age, had put a period to his own existence 'by cutting his throat. The eccentricities of the deceased were well known among his parishioners. He lived, in a manner, secluded- from all society, and indulged in habits and pursuits but seldom found ajuong gentlemen of his ^order a.,d station. The variotfs peculiarities of the rev. gentleman we shall describe hereafter 5 and we only advert to- them in this place so shew that the idea of his having committed suicide originated as much in the singular character of the deceased as in the appearance pre- sented by his mangled body. Mr. Waterhouse, as we have said, lived almost constantly alone 5 he had no regular female domestic 5 and on the morning of the fatal day, the old woman who occasionally assisted in the management of his house had been sent into a hM to hoe thistles. The danger attendant upon such a solitary mode of life had been often represented to the deceased by his friesw^s 3 but though in the last stage of b3 10 existence, the rev. gentleman was of a robust, hardy temperament, and an ntter stranger to fear. About half past ten o'clock, two boys in the service of Mr. Water- house entered the kitchen of the rev. gentleman, in which he chiefly resided, to eat their luncheon, which? they had brought with them from home. They satdown on a form opposite the fire-place, and presen-tly after dis- covered the legs of their master hanging over the side of a large bi'ewing tub, which stood in an adjoining passage. Ahrmed at a circumstance so unusual, and at the deep, groana which proceeded from, the spot, the boys fled from the premises in the utmost trepidation, and enter- ing the house of a neighbour, Ann Whitney, informed her of what they had seen. From her previous know-. Ipdge of Mr. Waterhouse, this woman thought he was either intoxicated, or had thrown himself into the tub in order to frighten the boys ; and, accordingly, instead qf proceedy^ig to tlie rectory to render what assistance she Gonld, she detained the boys in her own house, until they had finished thtir luncheon. In the interim, a young man, naificd Frederick Rogers, came up to the kitchen door^ and rapped wkh his whip, three several limes, but received no answer. The boys^ however, almost instantly returned to the yard, and seeing Rogers, informed him of the condition in which they had left their masier. After some hesitation, it^ appears he went in, but made, no attempt to extricate the unfortunate gentleman, until assisted by another person, William Ashby, who, opening the garden-door, which lighted^ the dark and gloomy passage, lifted the deceased out of ihq tub, and laid him on the floor. The hands and fore-* 11 head were quite warm ^ but it was too app irent tliat the vital spark had fled. A large wound wasdbcovered on the right cheek, and two or three on the handis. A female who was present unbuttoned the shirt collar of the deceased, when the blood came out in large flikes, and several wounds were discovered on the body. I'lie throat was also cut, and was bleeding profusely. A messenger was instantly despatched to Huntingdon for medical assistance, and iMr. Oakeley, a surgeon of that place, hastened to the spot, rather with a view to ascertain the nature of the injury which had occasioned the death of the rev. gentleman, than with the hope of being able to restore him. The appearance of the wounds in a moment convinced Mr. Oakeiey, that the deceased had not die repaired to the parsonage to examine the body, and after inspecting the wounds gave a similar decision. The tub also bore marks of having been frequently struck, in the course of the conflict, with some sharp instrument. There were several incisions en the edge, and a mark inside, as if the instrument had penetrated pretty deep, and a piece of the wood had come away when it was extracted. The walls of the passage were spotted with blood, and a considerable quantity was found in the tub which received the body of the expiring man. A thousand conjectures were now spread abroad as to the probable motives which actuated the murderer, and the means by which th^ deed was accomplished. It was- 12 believed by many that a feeling of ill-will or malice had impelled the hand of the assassin 3 but the more pro- bable supposition that some one had entered the pre-^:, mises to plunder, and being surprised by the rev. gentleman, a contest ensued which terminated in death, was generally received. The situation and internal condition of the premises, and the habits of Mr. Water- house, offered every facility for the commission of rob- bery. The rectory house is a large and elegant mansion, but the deceased latterly inhabited only the kitchen and a bed-room up stairs. The windows of the other apart- ments were blocked up to evade the payment of the window tax, and the rooms were filled with wool, grain, and other articles; thus at once affording a temptation to plunder, and ready opportunities for concealment. Opening up from the passage is a door leading into the garden, throufijh which the murderer apparently escaped, and found easy access into the adjoining fields. At seven o'clock in the evening of the murder, Wm. Margetts, Esq. coroner for the Hundred of Hursting- stone, attended at the Bell inn, for the purpose of holding an inquest. The constable having assembled a competent number of individuals, a jury was sworn,, consisting of the following persons : — William Busby, Foreman. Edward Lovett. Thomas Kendall. Thomas Garner;; William Butler. John Stanion, jun, John RobinsoEk* William Woods. Joseph Woods. William Chi Ids. John Stanion, sen. Benjamin Wyman. William Gale. There were also present the Rev. T. Brpwn,.0f Coa-^. uiogton, and H,enry. Sweeting, E$q. 13 The jury having repaired to the rectory, the Coroner addressed them to this effect: ''Gentlemen, our first duty is to examine the state of the bodv of the deceased. From every appearance there can be no doubt but that a most deliberate murder has been committed. If sus- picions arise in the mind of any one of you, with respect to the person or persons likely to defile their hands by a crime of the heinous nature on which we are about to deliberate — if you have witnessed any corroborative incident, or have heard of any conversation tending to throw light upon this frightful transaction — it is your bounden duty to make a full and unreserved declaration of every particular. The rights of justice and the laws of your country expect this fulfilment of your duty as men and jurors." The body was then minutely inspected : it was hor- ridly mutilated, at once confirming the ferocious spirit and deadly malignity of the assassin. The following account of the inquest will give the more minute details. Mr. George Oakeley, surgeon, deposed that he ex- amined the body of the deceased 5 found a very deep incision near the right ear, with a fracture of the right jaw, a great portion of which was completely severed, separating the vessels that were near it 5 he was deci- dedly of opinion that the wound on the jaw was sufficient to occasion death 5 has not the least doubt but that he was murdered by some person or persons, as no man could inflict such desperate wounds on himself as the body of Mr. Waterhouse exhibited ^ conceives that they were occasioned by some heavy instrument, probably axe or bill. 14 Mr. J. Wilson stated, that on the return of Mr. Oake- ley from Stukeley, he went to examine the body of the deceased, and found it accurately to correspond with Mr. CK's description. Several very dreadful wounds had been inflicted on the arms and the inside of the wrists and hands, which could only have been occasioned by defending himself from the attack of his murderous assailants. One wound had been received on the right lower jaw, in a line from the outer angle to the chin, and which had completely separated the jaw in two, longitudinally; another wound had been given across the nose; two superficial cuts upon the left cheek 5 several cuts upon the right arm, between the elbow and wrist, on the outside; a dreadful cut upon the left elbow, which had completely separated the condyles of the humerus ; there was also another cut, rather a severe one, on the outside of the left arm, on the elbow and wrist ; the inside of each wrist had received a ter- ribly incised wound, evidently in his own defence ; but what seems to have produced instantaneous death was a stab or thrust which had been received on the upper part of the throat, which had separated the bone of the tongue from the windpipe, had penetrated the wind- pipe on its upper part, and completely cut across the large vessels of the neck on the right side, from which blood had spurted most forcibly, and stained the two walls of the passage in which the deed was committed, from all which there can be no doubt that Mr. W. must have been cruelly murdered. William Parker, aged 14, the son of Samuel Parker> of Alconbury, labourer, being sworn, said he saw his 15 master for the last time about half past ten o*clock j he was then quite well j he rinced his pitcher, and went to wipe it on a towel in the passage 5 he was then in his usual spirits. Witness then went into the brewhouse, and threw some wheat out of the copper, which occupied a quarter of an hour. Reuben Briggs came home, and took some straw to litter the pigs 5 at eleven o'clock they went into the kitchen to have their luncheon 5 when in the kitchen, they saw the legs of their master hanging over the tub, and heard him groan 3 they were fright- ened, and ran to a neighbour's house (Mary Whitney's) to have their refreshment, Parker told her of the noise his master was making, and that he was in the tub 5 she replied that he was drunk, and wanted to frighten them 5 stopped at Mrs. Whitney's and had allowance. Mrs. Whitney told her sister of the circumstance. Was sure that his master w^as ill. He then, with R. Briggs, returned to work, at which he continued a quarter of an hour. A person of the name of Rogers came to the yard with a stallion, and knocked at the house door. As nobody came, he asked witness where the folks were. Told him that master was laid in the tub ; he asked me whether I would go in 5 told him I could not, as I was afraid, Rogers then said, do you stop here in the yard, and I'll go in. Rogers went straight across to the door, and called out, but did not receive any answer. Parker stated that he then went out of the yard with Reuben Briggs; told Mr. Ashby, and asked him if he would go in 5 he said yes, entered the pre- mises, and found Mr. Waterhouse in the tub ; attempted to lift him out, but could not, until assisted by a woman 16 who came in. William Harrison, who came at that moment, assisted to hold him. Witness was working in the dovehouse close at about eleven o'clock, and heard a loud scream 3 the close is nearly three chains from the house 5 the dog, which was chained to a ken* nel in the yard, was at that time barking very violently. A tramp came to the house about nine o'clock 5 saw him go through the gate 5 his master had been to lay his net in the fish pond in the morning 3 the kitchen door, the passage door, and the garden door, were all open at eleven o'clock ; he was the first person in his master's house that morning, being there at five o'clock 5 Mr. Water house washed his hands and face at that hour 5 did uot in the course of the morning see any person upon the premises, except the tramp and Rogers. Witness always goes to church when he can* He has no suspicion whatever of the person who committed the crime* Mr. Sweeting, solicitor, who during the investigation of the horrid transactioR evinced the most intense anx- iety, addressed Parker, and said,/* You are now, you say, fourteen years of age, and are a stout boy 3 you heard the dying groans of your master, yet you with- held your assistance. You have certainly shewn a most lamentable want of conrage, humanity, and prudence. Let me conjure you not to conceal anything respecting your master's untimely end, and in a matter of so much importance to tell the whole truth. Parker, who is a dull-looking boy, and who gave his evidence in an equivocal manner, declared that he did not know who had committed the murder. 17 Reuben Briggs, 1 1 years of age, the son of John Briggs, labourer, stated that he was at work at five o'clock in the morning, feeding the hogs 5 saw his master an hour afterwards, who gave him his breakfast 5 the passage and yard doors were then open : about eleven o'clock heard screams and the dog barking 5 was then a short distance from the house. When he went into the house at eleven, heard his master groaning in the tub, was afraid, and ran out to Mrs. Whitney's 5 got lunch there, and told Mrs, Whitney of the situation of his master 5 she said he was drunk. The remainder of this witness's evidence was similar to Parker's. Mary-Ann Wells, of Wandsford, aged 25, spinster, deposed that she came to Little Stukeley one month since, for the purpose of being married to Edward Briggs, of Stukeley 5 the marriage banns were published the second time on Sunday week, and were to have been published the third time on the following Sunday. Mr. Waterhouse objected, owing to some informality. Briggs left Little Stukeley the same evening, went to his work in the Fens, and has not been at Little Stukeley since. On Tuesday morning, between ten and eleven o'clock, a little girl, the daughter of Mrs. Whitney, came to her and said, " the old man is dead ; went afterwards into the house, and assisted in getting him out of the tub ; his forehead was then warm ; the garden door was partly open. Met Rogers, who said. For God's sake, some good Christian woman assist the old gentleman." Ashby, the blacksmith, assisted 5 untied Mr. Waterhouse's neckhandkerchief, upon which there was a great quantity of congealed blood 5 he was then warm, Ashby said, he's not dead: he's tipsy." c 18 Ann Whitney stated that the boys Parker and Brigg^ came into her house, and said their master was groaning in the tub 5 thought he was tipsy. The boys stated they heard Mr. Waterhouse groaning at eleven o'clock in the forenoon, just before they went to get their allowance 5 she did not go into the house, as her con* stitution was weak. Did not see any tramp on the premises that morning. Young Rogers, of Warboys, was the person who first discovered the body. Parker and Briggs are both steady and industrious boys, and of good character. William Harrison, labourer^ has been in the employ of Mr. Waterhouse nine years 5 had been working till half-past eleven o'clock, when he returned home > assisted Mr. Ashby in getting him out of the tub y he was then motionless, but quite warm. Has never had a quarrel with his master 5 was always on the best terms with him ; did not suspect any person of having committed the deed 5 he must have been murdered from a spirit of revenge, as his purse and keys were left in his pockets, His master had not taken any money lately for the sale of cattle or stock ; has not sold any thing for the last fortnight. He never kept more money in the house than was sufficient to pay his men. Mr. Waterhouse was in the habit of making presents to Mary Martin, who formerly lived with him as servant; she has since married a person of the name of George Sharpe, of Brampton. Mrs. Sharpe has been in the habit of visitins: his master twice in the year 5 she was at his house one day last spring, got dinner, and departed home in the afternoon. Never heard, nor did he know, anything detrimental to the character of 19 George Sharpe. He did not that morning see any vagrant on the premises. Mr. Waterhouse entertained a great dislike to vagrants, and frequently expressed it to them, when they asked charity of him 5 they have threatened him with violence 3 he never gave beggars any thing, and when they called, he would instantly order them to quit his premises. No hatchet or weapon likely to commit such a deed was found near the spot where it was perpetrated. Ann Gale, of Little Stukeley, deposed that she went to Mr. Waterhouse's at half-past five in the morning ; Mr, W. had then risen, and appeared in good health. Stopped in the house till half-past nine, thea went to hoe thistles in the fallow field. About eleven, the boy Parker came, and said his master was all over blood in the tub, and thought he was dead. She could not suspect any person. Her master turned off a stone- mason last week, for falling asleep when he should have been at his work. A vagrant came to the door that morning, at about half-past eight 5 he wore a blue handkerchief round his head, and was dressed in a light coloured jacket, and light trousers. He was a short, stout, pale-looking man. Ann Wormsley gave similar evidence. Sarah Leach stated that she had heard a conversation with respect to the affair. Mrs. Heddiugs said that her husband had remarked on the Sunday preceding the last, that now Mr. W.'s servants had left him, he should not be surprised if he cut his throat before the next. Mrs. Heddings was summoned from her bed at Iwelve o'clock, and deposed that she had no suspicion 20 6{ any person, and that she had never held any conver- sation with respect to the singularity of the affair. The Inquest was then adjourned to Wednesday after- noon. At five o'clock on Wednesday afternoon the coroner and jury re-assembled 5 but little fresh evidence was brought forward tending to throw any light upon the mysterious transaction of the preceding day. Two men^ who were strongly suspected of being implicated in the horrid deed, produced each a witness, who positively swore that they were respectively working with them in the hay-field during the whole of Tuesday. The next witness examined was Anne Elby, who deposed that she was in company with another woman, walking along the high road near to the Horse Shoes, at Great Stukeley, when she saw a man coming down a close in a line from Mr. Waterhouse's house, making for the road, and when he arrived at the hollow between the two hills, where there is a tunnel beneath the road, he disappeared under it, and was not afterwards seen, although the witness and her companion watched for a considerable time. He appeared to have a short slop on 5 but the distance was too great to allow her to speak to the lower part of his dress 5 it was exactly 1 1 o'clock when they reached the Swan at Little Stukeley, which is but a short distance from the above-mentioned place. Two men who had examined the tunnel were next sworn, and deposed to finding foot-marks, with large nails in the shoes, in the entrance of the tunnel, but 21 could not discover any thing further of a suspicioatj^ nature. The wife of one of the suspected persons (Heddings) was again re-examined, touching some rather remark- able expressions told a neighbour, and having been used by her husband, as to what might happen to the decea- sed " before another Sabbath day but she, as well as her husband, now stoutly denied having used the expres- sions stated. The coroner then summed up and addressed the jury. He regretted that their labours had hitherto been inef- fectual, but he strongly entertained an opinion that the deceased had been murdered by some person or persons well acquainted with the house, and the habits of its unfortunate inmate 5 he felt convinced the deed was committed from a feeling of jealousy or revenge 5 and concluded by expressing his earnest hope that they would strain every nerve to detect the inhuman authors of so foul a crime. After some observations from Mr. Sweeting (who with the worthy coroner were unremit- ting in their exertions to further the ends of justice), pointing out the most prompt method of seizing any sus- pected person, and recommending the utmost watchful- ness, the jury unanimously returned a verdict of fFilful Murder against some person or persons unknown. It is a singular circumstance, that during the morning of the murder, the yard-dog belonging to Mr. Water- bouse, which was always considered as a very fierce animal, and the terror o( the villagers, was observed to be unusually restless and continually barking 5 but he was unfortunately chained to bis kennel. Since the ' q3 5^2 commission of the murder, his temper has undergone a complete change : he now permits every stranger to caress him, and is extremely docile. The faithful ani- mal seems to be aware of the death of his master, and that he has no further need of his protection. The first person suspected of having perpetrated this atrocious crime was William Heddings, a man of noto- riously bad character, resident in the village. In 1823 he was convicted at the assizes of a burglary, and con- demned to be executed ; but his sentence was commuted to three years' imprisonment in the House of Correction 5 and so well did he conduct himself during the earlier part of this period, that at the expiration of twenty months he obtained his release, application having been made on his behalf to the Secretary of State. On regaining his liberty, Heddings was placed by his friends in comparatively easy and comfortable circumstances. His wife's father had died and left her a house and close and about sixty pounds ; and with this sum a cow was purchased, two or three pigs, &c. Thus possessed of the means of present and of future comfort, it was confi- dently anticipated that a radical change would take place in his demeanour. The seeds of vice, however, \^ere too deeply sown in the mind of Heddings to be so easily eradicated. He returned to his former habits with renewed activity, and though he had as yet escaped a second apprehension, it was well known that he had linked himself with two abandoned youths in the village, John and Joshua Slade, in the commission of various pelty and extensive robberies. It was soon proved that Heddings stood wholly free from the capital charge. 23 On the second examination before the coroner, he came home, having been at Huntingdon from the Sunday previous, and established an alibi. On Tuesday he had been employed by Mr. Maile, mowing in a field near Huntingdon. Joshua Slade, another suspicious character, was then called upon to account for himself on the day of the murder. He stated that after leaving the swan public house, where he had been drinking till one or two o'clock on Tuesday morning, he went to Godman- chester to invite his sister, a married woman, to Stnke- ley Feast. At her house, he said, he remained all day, and returned to Stukeley about seven o'clock in the evening. The same assertion he repeated before the coroner on Wednesday, and added the names of two public houses, the Horse and Jockey, Huntingdon, and the Rose and Crown, Godmanchester, at which he had stopt and drank some beer during the day. His sister voluntarily came forward, and confirmed this statement 5 and the prisoner was discharged. The general feeling, however, at Stukeley, was strong against Slade 5 and on the Friday, John Richardson, a constable of Huntingdon, again apprehended him, and took him to the two public houses at which he said he stopt, in order to ascertain the truth of his statement. The constable soon discover- ed that the whole was a fabrication, Slade had stopt at neither of the public houses, and his brother in law, Joshua Rowledge, came forward and deposed that the statement that he had been at his house on the Tuesday was equally false. Driven from this ground, Slade sta- ted that he knew the Stukeley people were all against 24 him, and would hang him if they could, and it was on; that acco^int that he had said he was at Godmanchester^. The truth, however, was, that feeling himself tipsy after he left the Swan, he went into a hay-field and lay there all day 3 and he knew nothing of the murder until his mother told him of it in the evening. In consequence of these prevarications, Slade was taken into custody, and various evidences of guilt began to thicken against him. Peter Sabey, an old man who inhabits a cottage opposite to the Rectory, said he saw a person get over Mr. Waterhouse*s wall, about three o'clock on the morning of the murder. He did not see the face of the man, but from his general appearance, and from his lobbing- from one side to another as he walked, he thought it was Josh. Slade. The clothes of the prisoner were then taken from him, and examined : his coat was discovered to be stained with blood inside, though care had been taken to wash it off the exterior. His breeches also appeared to have been partially washed. His shoes were taken off and com- pared with a footmark near Mr. Waterhouse's kitchen window, where a person would stand to look in 5 and with some other marks at a stile leading to the tunnel between the two Stukeleys, into which a person, corresponding in appearance with Slade, was, as we have already stated, seen to enter. The footmarks corresponded exactly with the print of Blade's shoe. While the enquiry was still going on, a young man who had worked in company with Slade, at Mr. Hall's, Stukeley, came forward and stated that he had heard the prisoner say he would murder Mr. Waterhou§e,, 25 and that he had keys to let himself into his house at all times. A few weeks previous to the murder^ Mr. Waterhouse was robbed by a person who had concealed himself in the house, and in the dead of the night going into his bed-room, took from over his head his watch j and about £2, from the pockets of his small-clothes, which lay upon the floor. So impressed was the rev. gentle- man with the narrow escape he had then of his life, that on the next Sunday, with tears in his eyes, he offered up two prayers or thanksgivings to Almighty God for his safe deliverance from the hand of an assas- sin. The suspicions of Mr. VV, instantly fell upon the prisoner Slade, whose sister was at that time in his service, and suspecting her to be privy to the robbery, he immediately discharged her. It was upon this occa- sion that Slade was heard to threaten Mr. Waterhouse. That the case mi;j[ht be fully investigated in every point, application was made to the Secretary of State for the Home Department to secure the assistance of a Bow Street officer ; in consequence of which Kllis arri- ved, and entered upon the task with his accustomed activity. Little, however, was left for this able officer to perform : the guilty person was undoubtedly in cus* tpdy, and in this opinion Ellis fully concurred. He deeply regretted that so much time had at first been lost. As the parents of the prisoner also bore a bad cha- racter in the village, a warrant was obtained for search- ing their house, when goods were discovered not likely to have been honestly obtained by persons in their des- titute condition. Though in the weekly receipt of 26 money from the parish, the inmates of this miserable cottage were found to possess six or seven flitches of bacon, two sacks of pease, quantities of pork, ham, &c. In the cottage was also found, stained with blood, and mixed with what seemed to be grey hairs, a bill, or cleaver, the kind of instrument with which it was gene- rally supposed the murder was committed. These vari- ous suspicious circumstances induced the magistrates to detain the fatlier and mother of the prisoner in custody, until a further examination could take placfv On the day following these important discoveries, John Slade, a brother of the prisoner, aged 22, delivered himself up, and said he was tired of leading the life he had for some time led. In co!fj':nction with his brother and Heddings, he had been coficerned in several burgla- ries and robberies, and he was anxious to make every atonement in his power. Search was instantly made for Heddings, but though he had been at home at Stukeley the evening before, he was not then to be found. Proceeding upon the confession of John Slade, a pub- lic examination took place on Monday in the Town Hall, Old Sabey, the labourer, who lives opposite the parson- age, declared his belief that the prisoner was the person who got over the wall on the morning of the fatal day, and Mr, Wilson, surgeon, deposed to finding the stains of blood on the prisoner's clothes. On Thursday another examination took place, when Slade, the father ; his wife, and two sons, were placed at the bar, charged with breaking into the dwelling house ot Emmapuel Thorapaquj of Stow, near Kimbolton, in 27 the night of the 5th of June last, and stealing a quantity of hams, bacon, &c. They carried a bureau out of the house a distance of sixty yards, and opening it stole iiome money in sovereigns and notes, a hat, gun, and great coat, ail which were found on Slade's premises. John and Joshua Siade confessed the burglary, and charged Beddings as an accomplice. The second charge against them was for stealing three live pigs out of the yard of Mr. Goodliffe, Woodwalton, two of which were found in a pigstye at Slade's, and one at Heddings's, They had also stolen a sack belonging to Mr. Goodliffe. The third charge was for stealing pease, and some sacks from Messrs. Bowker and Morley, executors of the late Mr, Burgess Bowker, of Alconbury 3 and there was another charge of pig-stealing from Mr. Storey, of Broughton, the examination of which was deferred till another day. For the above felonies, John and Joshua Slade were fully committed, for trial at the assizes, and also the father and mother for receiving the goods know- ing them to have been stolen. iSxammatiaii of i^eUKing^* One link in the chain was still wanting, the capture of Heddings, and this was soon supplied by himself. Late on Thursday night this notorious offender surren- dered himself to the keeper of the House of Correction. He had concealed himself in a hovel near New Pasture Common, for four days, and seeing no chance of escape, and most probably tired of his retreat, he discovered himself to the shepherd, and wished him to fetch the kfeepfei* of the House of Correction, to whom he would deliver himself up. This being done, he was conveyed to the office of Mr. Sweeting, and confessed to the bur- glary committed at Stow, He also stated, that meeting with Joshua Slade on the night of the inquest, the latter confessed to him that he was the murderer of Mr Waterhouse, Information coming from so polluted jsl source was obviously liable to much suspicion, but the magistrates acted wisely in determining to confront the two offenders, and thus endeavour to establish more clearly the supposed guilt of Slade. Accordingly atone o'clock on Monday, Slade was brought from the gaol to the council chamber, surrounded by a vast concourse of persons. He was heavily ironed, and had at first sight a squalid and miserable appearance. He looked round on the full bench of magistrates and numerous spectators with evident surprise, but betrayed no symptoms of fear or remorse. Heddings vras shortly afterwards produced at the bar ; but Slade, although he had been kept igno- rant of the latter being in custody, manifested no emo- tion on the occasion. The clerk of the county, John Sweeting, Esq , then proceeded to read the deposition of Heddings, which was in substance as follows • On Wednesday night after the murder, I saw Joshua Slade on the turnpike road in Little Stukeley, near nine o'clock. The inquest was then over. I jog- ged him on the elbow, and called him on one side, and asked him what he thought of this concern. He said, ' I don't kuow.* I made answer, — ' D n it, how came you to lay hands on him V He said, ' I was forced j I was in the low kitchen, plundering 3 Mr, Waterhouse hatched hold of me 5 1 drew ray knife, and began to stab him where 1 could 5 he then called out " murder," and I got him down on the floor, and got a weapon, with whidi 1 hit him a hard blow on the face, anil knocked him down 5 thea 1 hit him several times oa the arms, and where I could, to prevent him rising up again. I then heard the dog bark very vehemently at the door, I went to see if any person was coming j there being nobody there, I went back to Mr. VVaterhonse again, and he had risen up on his legs. I then hit him ano- ther hard blow on the head, and knocked him into the tub. I then ran out at the garden door and left him. 1 ran down the close of grass leading to Great Stukeley." Having disposed of the murder, Heddings went on to state that he and Slade, and a fellow named John Hawkes, of Huntingdon, whom they met, went into the Swan public-house, and drank some ale, after which he went home and went to bed. About seven weeksago," he continued, according to the deposition, on a Saturday night, Mr W aterhouse's house was robbed, which I heard from a labourer. 1 he next day after dinner I was lying in my own close j Joshua Slade, seeing me as he went by, came and lay down with me. I said there had been some one rob- bing the old parson of a pound note 5 he said, I know better than that — they robbed him of two, and a good many other things besides 1 then said, have you been there } and on his owning it, I asked him what he had got 5 — he said, I got a pair of boots, a large dining table cloth, and seven small ones 5 about 40 yards of fine shirting cloth, and 17 yards of coarser 5 a dozen D so and a half of knives and forks, and five cheese knives* 1 said, I wonder how Mr. Waterhouse should go to bed and leave the door open 5 he said I went in about eleven o'clock in the day, and went up into Mr. W.'s bed- chamber, when I took down his blunderbuss and unloaded it, and shoved some paper in the stead of it, so that he could not shoot me. Having done this, I took what [ chose, and tied them up in a bundle 5 I then went up into a garret, and laid down among some wool till eleven o'clock at night, when Mr. W. was in bed ; I went out at the garden door, and set my shoes and bundle there 5 I then went up stairs again, with a brace of pistols of Mr. W.'s (which I had taken from him before), to see what money he had about him } I saw his breeches lying on the floor, and I took out of them one pound in silver and a pound note. I then asked Slade if he was not afraid Mr. W. should waken 3 he said, ^ No, not 1 5 if he had stirred hand or foot, I should have shot him as he lay." After the deposition had been read, and Heddings had affixed his mark to it, Slade was asked if he had any thing to say : he answered, ^' No, your honour ; but he has told some false tales ; 1 did not say a word of what he says on the Wednesday night 3 he wants to hang me without judge or jury, d — n him, he should have been hanged years ago himself/' Mr. Cole, keeper of the prison, was then sworn and examined *^ I produce a knife which I got from the pri- soner, Joshua Slade 3 I asked him for it after the first day of examination, but he said his mother had got it and his watch. I told him afterwards that he must 31 give it up 5 he then said, they (himself and the other prisoners) had concealed it, as they had no knife to cut their bread with. I replied^ you must give it up/' and he immediately got it down from a shelf. I ex- amined the knife j it was newly cleaned : I wrapped it in a piece of brown paper, and laid it by. Two or three days afterwards I looked at the knife again, and there appeared on the blade marks of blood 5 the red shades which are now seen appear to have come out since I had it.'* (The knife was then handed round the table 5 it is a good large clasp knife, and apparently new. Stains of a dark brown or reddish shade may be clearly perceived about an inch from the point.) The prisoner being interrogated as to the nature of the stains which appeared on the knife, coolly replied They a'n't blood, nor aught like it." The commitment of the prisoner was then made out, and he was conducted back to prison. Heddings was next examined as to his participation in a felony, developed in the following evidence : — John Storey, of Broughton, in the county of Hun- tingdon, had two pigs stolen from his straw-yard one night, about ten or eleven weeks since. Hearing of the apprehension of John and Joshua Slade, he went to Stukeley, and found one of the pigs in a stye of Joshua Slade's house, and the other in a stye at Heddings's. John Wayles, brother-in-law of Storey, corroborated this evidence, and said he could swear to the pigs on account of their breed, colour, and a cut in the nose of each. Heddings confessed, though somewhat reluc- tantly, that he could not account for the pig being in his possession, and was accordingly committed. d2 32 iBxamimtion of Uamtfalt Wivigftu Suspicion being entertained that a man named Lans- dale Wright was possessed of part of the property of Mr. Waterhouse, a constable was despatched to March, in the county of Cambridge, where it was understood he was then living, to examine his house, and take him into custody. On Friday (July 20), Wright was brought up before the magistrates, when he confessed to having purchased the following articles of Joshua Slade : a pair of new boots, a pillow-case, a piece of striped dimity, a piece of Irish sheeting, two pieces of Irish shirting, a large table cloth, and sundry knives and forks. Part of the goods were found in holes dug in the garden, which Wright's wife pointed out to the constable. Maria Sharpe, wife of John 8harpe, of Brampton, identified the articles prod'orced as the property of the late Mr Waterhouse, Mrs.. JSharpe had lived five years with Mr. W. as housekeeper, and left him seven years ago to be married. Wright was then fully committed for receiving the goods, knowing them to have been stolen. Having disposed of this case, the sitting magistrate> Mr. Torkington, called upon William Francis, a ma- chine-mender, or carpenter, of Little Stukeley, on the subject of the murder. Francis deposed to having been in company with Slade at the Swan public house on the night of Monday the^2d. Slade left between one and two o'clock, he seemed sober, and went up towards the church, which is the way both to his own house and to that of Mr, Waterhouse. This witness, and Mr. Woods, the constable of Stukeley, stated that they had compared Shade's shoes with the footmarks seen in the- adjoining grounds, and found that they fitted exactly* 33 The case of the prisoner now seemed desperate. He was fully committed for trial, on a charge the heaviest which can be preferred against a human being, and a variety of circumstantial evidence had been adduced against him, which, together with his previous bad character, left little room to doubt of his guilt. A fort* night, however, had to intervene before he could be brought up for trial 5 and we shall take this opportunity of presenting the reader with a more detailed account of the life and character of Mr. Waterhouse, and of his murderer. Sfeetrft of tfie Uift of £Bv. midittti)omt. Mr.. Waterhouse was born at his father's estate of Birch-hall, near Hayfield, in the parish of Glossop, Derbyshire, in January, 1746. He was the younsjest of four children, all of whom have now paid the debt of nature. The history of his eldest brother is some- what singular. He was apprenticed to a shoemaker, but disliking the business, or being naturally of a roving disposition, he ran away before the expiration of his apprenticeship. Repenting of this step, he wrote to his master desiring him to take him back, which the good-natured craftsman agreed to do. He had some doubts, however, of the lad's integrity, and as he went on horseback to fetch him home, he took the precaution- ary measure of fastening him to his own body, by means of a strap, to prevent his escape from the horse on which they were hoth seated. But even in this Crispin was foiled. As they were leisurely proceeding on their journey, the lad contrived to cut the stra|> 34 which bound him to his master, and slipping off the horse at a convenient part of the road, which was much wcoded, he was speedily out of sight, and beyond the reach of his employer. The latter beiag unable to pur- sue him on horseback amidst the tangled wood, sooa gave up the pursuit, and seeing the unpromising dispo- sition of the youths made no further inquiry after him. Young Waterhouse then enlisted, and was afterwards present at the battle of Fontenoy, where the allied forces, under the command of the Duke of Cumberland, were partially defeated by the French in the year 1745. Towards the close of the day he was lying on the ground slightly wounded, and observing the slain body of an officer beside him on the field, he stretched out his arm, and made a pull at the officer's watch, which displayed the tempting appendages of a gold chain and seals. The unfortunate gentleman was in no condition to resist the attempt j but at that moment another person, bent on the same thieving errand, beheld the motion, and despairing of his booty if Waterhouse succeeded in obtaining it, he lifted up his rifle, and discharging it at his head, stretched him lifeless on the field ! This anecdote we had from one of the heirs of the late Rev. Mr. Waterhouse. Joshua was from his earliest years destined for a respectable station in society. His father, though not an affluent, was a respectable English farmer ; and having given him the best education the place afforded, he determined upon sending his son to college. Accord- ingly, about the year 1771, he was entered of Catherine Hall, Cambridge. He took his first degree in 1774, 35 his next, A.M., in 1777, and S.T.B, (Bachelor of Divi- nity) in 1786. Mr. W. although he obtained a fellow- ship, did not much distinguish himself at college. His name is not once inserted in either lists of honours, and his election to a Fellowship was rather incidental to the Under-Graduates of his college that year not having obtained an honour (with the exception of Mr. Wood) than to any intrinsic merit. Having entered into orders, Mr. Waterhouse succeeded shortly afterwards, to the college living of Coton, near Cambridge, which he was permitted to hold w^ith his fellou^ship. On the death of Dr. Lowther Yates, in 1799, he was a candidate for the Mastership of the college, in which he was disap- pointed, though he was defeated by only a majority of one. It is said that, believing himself to be elected, he took Some extraordinary steps to secure the appointment, such as taking possession of the Master's house, &c. but of course he was compelled to relinquish his tran- sitory honours. During the period of his academic career, Mr. Waterhouse is described as being one of the handsomest, best-dressed men of his college. In company with his friend Sir John Danvers, Bart, who contributed materially to his advance in life, he visited Bath, and the various fashionable w^atering places, mingling with the best society, in ** the bustle of the busy and the flutter of the gay." About the year 1806 he obtained the next presenta- tion to the rectory of Little Stukeley, for which, it is said he gave ^2000. At the same time time he bought a piece- of land called the Denhills, in the same parish ; and before his final removal to Stukeley, the rev. gen- 36 tlcraan used to visit it once or twice a year, to look at this land, and observe the condition of his stock, &c.. In 1813, the Rev. Dr. Torkington, incumbent of Little Stukeley, died, upon which Mr. Waterhouse succeeded to the living, and went thither, in June, to-? reside* It is said that the change was in many respects^ agreeable to him. During the excessive high price of corn, about thirty years ago, he had excited a good deal of odium and evil report by keeping up many years' growth of wheat, which he afterwards sold at loss. Several charges for immoral conduct are also said to have been preferred against him before the Bishop of Ely 5 and it w^as therefore equally natural and proper that the rev. gentleman should desire to enter upon a new scene of action, in which he might, if so disposed, correct the errors of his past conduct, and in which he would at all events be removed from the observation of his former censors. Happy, if he had carriedT with him into his new residence a sincere desire for the welfare of his flock^ and a resolution to maintain the respecta- bility of the sacred character with which he was invested. The latter years of Mr. Waterhouse*s life presented a woful contrast to the honourable scenes amidst which his youth.and manhood were spent^ and furnish ample natter for reflection to those who love to study the vari- ous phases and aberrations of human nature. For the * The Register of Little Stukeley commences in 1655. On the first leaf is written as follows : Benjamin Gery succeeded Mr. William Halley 1657, and died 1699. Leonard Green succeeded, and died 1737, James Torkington succeeded, and died 1813. Joshua Waterhouse succeeded. 37 last twenty or thirty years of his life, the rev. gentlemant might be considered as no bad representative ot a cer- tain class of English Clergy of the last century, who sat as models for the portraitures of Fielding and other satirists, but who are happily now fast disappearing. In dress and manners he was simple as Abraham Adams himself 5 though it must be confessed, in certain points of his character, he bore a closer resemblance to Parson Trulliber. The whole of the land attached to his rec- tory at Stukeley, about 300 acres^ he retained in his own occupation, and busied himself incessantly, though often very unprohtably, in the management of his rural affairs. As he would seldom pay his labourers the wages usually given in the parish, his land remained uncultivated if work was to be obtained elsewhere, and last year he had not completed his hay^harvest till con- siderably after Michaelmas. Frequently the snow might be seen on Mr. Waterhouse's standing grain, or the cattle feeding in his corn-fields. The same blind parsi- money led him to hoard up his produce, till the greater part became rotten and useless. Every room in the parsonage, with the exception of the kitchen and a sleep- ing room, was filled with grain or wool, and in different granaries in Huntingdon, the rev. gentleman had about 600 loads of corn. In consequence of this unnatural impropriation" the rectory abounded with rats, which exacted a tithe of their master's crops, besides dilapida- • ting his mansion from turret to foundation stone/ * * A ludicrous instance of the prevalence of these vermin in the house occurred lately. One of the men employed to sit up with the corpse of the deceased gentleman had just dropped off into a gentle slumber, when a tre- mendous rat mounted the table, and ran off with the candle. The poor fellow, on beiqg awakened by the noise, was almost frig-hteced out ot his wit& as In the same spirit, the windows of the house were blocked up — the garden became a wilderness — and scores of pigs disported in front of the rectory door, formerly graced with a lawn, and a carriage entrance. A few years since, Mr. Waterhouse believing himself to be on the brink of matrimony, had two or three of his apartments elegantly furnished. Men were employed from Cambridge to complete the undertaking, and about 5^300. were expended in making preparations for the expected bride. But from some undiscovered cause the match was broken off — the moreen curtains and splen- did mirrors were suffered to remain in the cotton cover- ings which enveloped them, and the Turkey carpets, instead of being pressed by the foot of beauty, were covered with s prying grain ! Every Saturday Mr. Waterhouse attended Hunting- don market on foot, sometimes driving his pigs before him 3 and after transacting his farming business, he used to carry home in a basket his tea and sugar, and other necessaries for the week. He had all the indif- ference of a Stoic of the woods to the various changes of the weather. Amidst hail, rain, and snow, the aged rector might be seen perambulating his grounds, or hallooing to his workmen or cattle. When his clothes were soiled after following the pleasures of the chace, of which at one time he was very fond, frequently rising before day-break, or sleeping under hedges, to be early in the field on the first of September, the rev. gentleman required no extensive wardrobe to repair the mishaps of his outward man. On these occasions he used to visit the fish-pond situated on his premises, and with the aid 39 of a brush, copiously charged with water^ restore thi5 wonted respectability to his personal appearance. A favourite grey horse which he had reared was lat- terly a source of much pride and gratification to Mr. Waterhouse. This beautiful animal he intended to exhibit for a week at the horse bazaar, and then present it to his Majesty, It is said that he was offered above c^200. for the horse, but refused to sell it, as the intended purchaser had rather outwitted him in a for- mer bargain. Two horses bred from the same mare had fetched ^''600. in London, although Mr. W. had incautiously parted with them at less than half that sum. To be revenged on the dealers, Mr. Waterhouse, with his usual policy, determined that they should never again enrich themselves at his expence. The memorable speech of the Duke of York on the Catholic claims so transported th€ rev. gentleman, that in the extacy of the moment he exclaimed, the Duke shall have my beau- tiful creature" — the appellation he generally bestowed on his favourite horse. At the sale of the rev. gentle- man's effects, this highly-prized animal was sold for 155 guineas. The sale was attended by thousands of indivi- duals, attracted by the value of the stock, the various circumstances attending the sale, and the unusual fine- ness of the day. Every horse, gig, and chaise in the county was in requisition ; and droves of pedestrians braved the summer's heat and dust to visit the far-famed parsonage. Though living in such a " muddling way,'* as the villagers terra it, Mr. W. was possessed of a variety of excellent furniture 5 and few farmers could boast of a better stocked farm-vard. He had 15 horses, 40 about 15 cows and calves, 200 sheep and lambs, a numerous progeny of hogs, pigs, 8tc. amounting in all to about 150. These might be truly termed the family of Mr. Waterhouse. Induced by the chagrins of life, or false views of his own interest and comfort, he relin- quished the society of his equals, and lavished upon the irrational objects around him that care and anxiety vi^hich should have been devoted to higher purposes. In politics, Mr. W, was a zealous Tory, and decidedly opposed to granting any further concessions to the Catholics if ever they attained to power, he used to say, he should fall the first martyr to the fires of perse* cution 5 for the Catholics could not but be aware of his strenuous resistance to their claims. The following passage in the life of this singular cler- gyman is worthy the pencil of Cruickshank. To beggars of all descriptions he had a strong insuperable aversion : and as in most small villages the domicile of the rector is only inferior in importance to the mansion of the squire, numbers of these itinerants contiived to way-lay the path of the rector of Stukeley, vi^ith prayers and supplications. Of course they were always repulsed w^ith scorn and indignation, and not unfrequently veteran tars* and soldiers might be seen at his gate shouldering their crutches, not to shew how fields were won, but to attempt the achievement of fresh victories. One Sun- day, while performing divine service, the rector per- ceived from a window in the church a sturdy mendicant prowling about his grounds, whom he instantly deter- mined to remove in the most prompt and efficacious manner. Watching a favourable moment, the preacher 41 descended from the desk ; after giving out tfee Psalm, and throwing off his surplice at the church door, he in- stantly attacked the graceless intruder, and Uivly (hr ashed him off the premises. Having performed this feat, Mr. W. coolly re-entered the church at the conclusion of the Psalm, and proceeded to read the Lessons of the day.*^ 'On one point the rector of Stukeley was a careful shep- herd of his flock ; he would not suffer any of his parish- ioners to appear in Church dressed in a smock frock, the usual cjarb of our agricultural labourers 5 and if a hapless rustic chanced to drop in arrayed in tlie pro- hibited toga, he was instantly ordered by the pastor to quit the Church. This severity of discipline was the more extraordinary in Mr. Waterhouse, as few men vi^ere more careless of their own exterior. A coarse blue great coat, corduroy breeches, and light grey stockings, formed his usual costume. As a necessary consequence, from his unaccommoda- ting disposition and outr^ manners, Mr. Waterhouse was but little respected by his humble parishioners. One Sunday whilst delivering his sermon, his attention was attracted by the appearance of a boy in the Church, who was standing up, swinging his body backwards and for- wards. ^' What is the matter with that boy," said he, " he does not seem right:' If you were as right as he U/* rejoined the boy's father, speaking aloud, " you • An anecdote similar to the above is related of Mr. W. at Coton. He ont Sunday told the Clerk, Mr. Agar, to give out a good long psalm, whilst he went to the parsonage to dislodge a young man, a miller, whom he had seen enter his house, and who was in the habit of risting his housekeeper. The clerk, faithfuUo hi» trusty sang on tiU the r«ctor returned, by which titi>e he had accomplished at^out twenty verses. E would be better tuan you are.*' The rector proceeded^ but observing the boy continue in the same position, he again stopped. ** Cannot that boy sit down/' he said, he must be out of his senses.'' *^ I tell you again/* said the former interlocutor in this strange dialogue, that if you were as sensible as he i&^ you would be better than you are.'* No further interruption took place ; and it would be difficult to say which party stood in the most humiliating light^— the parent of the boy who could so far forget the sanctity and decorum of the place, or the clergyman to whom such language could with seeming propriety be addressed. It is wor- thy of remark that almost the only poor family in the village to whom Mr W» seemed to shew any attention or regard was the family of the Slades. At Coton, Mr W. was distinguished for the same eccentricities which afterwards marked his conduct at Stukeley. Being then a Fellow of Catherine Hall, he was entitled to dine at his collie, and he never failed, we believe, to walk into Cambridge, duly every day, to participate in the banquet. An old woman of the parish, whose door he used to pass in the course of these daily peregrinations, frequently surprised him by invoking blessings on his head, and praying for the prolongation of his life. One day while the aged dame was dropping her usual curtesy, and pouring oiit her unusual benedic- tions, the rector stopped and enquired the reason why his parishioner always saluted him so kindly — *'You know, sir/' she replied, it is said that after bad comes worse, and I am sure w^hen you are taken away, we shall have the old one himself/* Mr. W. it is said. 43 kughed at the joke, and gave the old woman a penny. Amongst the numerous peculiarities which marked the wayward ill-regulated mind of Mr, Waterhouse, may be reckoned an excessive fondness for the company and amusements of children, which contrasted strangely with his usually selfish, violent, and even morose tem- per. He seldom passed a child in the streets without addressing it in a tone of good humour or affection. He delighted also in teasing his poor uncouth farm-boys, in sending them upon wrong errands — and standing over them brandishing a whip, with his coat off and his shirt sleeves tucked up, whilst the terrified rustics were eat- ing their victuals. Mr. died intestate, though possessed of considera- ble property. His two li ings were worth about aS700 ^r 5^800. per annum, and if we consider his advanced age, and his solitary, economical habits, we shall readily believe that his property amounted to several thousands. It is a remarkable circumstance in his remarkable life, that though he lived to such an advanced age in a state of celibacy, and though his usual tastes and pursuits were of such a nature as seem calculated to deaden every trace of the tender passion,** his correspondence con- sists almost entirely of love letters. So careless was the rev. gentleman of these amatory epistles, that lat- terly they might be found lying scattered about his kitchen, open to the gaze of every curious visitor. Se- veral of them, written about forty years ago, when Mr. W. was in the hey*day of life and fashion, breathed the most ardent attachment and devotedness to his interests. Others were of a more worldly, every-day character : E 2 44 Mr. Waterliouse was in both the object of ttnboondcd regard and affection ^ but in the latter, a spirit of pru- dence prevailed 5 and tender enquiries after his health and spirits, were accompanied by admonitions no less tender respecting the management of his cows and pigs. Mr. W. used to say that he had love letters enough, of one kind or unother, to cook the marriage feast, when- ever it should take place y and that the rev. gentlenaan was not far wrong in his conjecture may be guessed from the fact, that at the time of his death, these melting epistles were numerous enough to fill an entire sack. Amongst the many fair ones to whom the singular rector of Stukeley paid his addresses was the once-fa- mous Mary Wolstoaecroft, distinguished during the period of the French Revolution for her democratical writings, and afterwards united to Mr. Godwin, author of St. Leon, &c. How far the rev. gentleman sped in his wooing with this intellectual amazon we have not been able to ascertain 5 but, like all his other attach- ments, his passion for the author of the Mights of PFoman was destined ta evince the truth of the poet's observation. The course of true love never did run smooth. In 1823, a man named Savage was executed at Hun- tingdon for arson, and Mr, W., like many others, went to witnes the painful exhibition. On the road he happened to meet with Joshua Slade, and it is worthy of remark, that they entered Huntingdon together, and beheld the criminal suffer. Could they have foreseen what was to occur in a few short years, with what feelings must they have regarded each other ! : The last sermon preached by M r. Waterhoqse was m 45 his own church, from the following words. Job, chap. ii. V. 10, Shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evilP*' In the morning of the same day (the Sunday prior to his death), he performed duty at the neighbouring parish of Upton, and preached an impressive discourse from these words, also in Job : — Ml/ soul is weary of my life I will leave my com' plaint upon myself.^' (Chap, x,, v. 1.) In the discharge of his clerical duties, particularly whilst engaged in reading the Lessons, Mr. W. was frequently overpow- ered by his feelings, and compelled'lo stop. The selfish and sordid passions which, in his iiitercourse with the world, seemed to hold such a mastery over his heart and understanding, vanished before the touching exhortations and sublime truths of the Gospel, and unable to contain himself he would burst into tears. A short time before his death he made a singular request with regard to his funeral . — Let me," said he to his clerk, be buried twelve feet deep— my coffin standing perpendicularly on its foot: let my face front the east : I shall then be ready : for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised/* — This request was not literally complied with : his grave was dug to nearly the depth of twelve feet, but his coffin was placed in the usual position. The life and history of this ecceniric, i»l-fated clergy- man will long be remembered, and will serve, we hope, as a beacon, to warn succeeding clergymen from the dangerous courses into which he fell. We forbear enter- ing into details over which humanity counsels us to draw a veil — Let his errors sleep with him in the grave, a nd Be not remembered in his epiUplu B 3 4fe Joshua Slade was born at Great Stukeley, on the 14th of January, 1809, and was the third of nine chil- dren. His parents were m the lowest condition of our agricultural poor, aad, burdened with th^ maintenance of so numerous a family, could not afford, even if their inclination had prompted them, to provide their chil- dren with the rudiments of education. It appears, how- ever, that Joshua received some instruction at a Sunday School established in the village. He had mastered the drudgery of learning his letters, and could spell words of one or two syllables. The benevolent lady who instructed him, from his aptness and attention, was fond of her scliolar : she rewarded him frequently with merit tickets, and gave him a suit of clothes. One Sunday in returning from the schoo], he lost his tickets, and this serving as a pretext for non-attendance, no considera- tion could afterwards induce him to go again to school. The little learning that he had gained was consequently soon forgotten J and deprived of this opportunity of acquiring knowledge, he was left literally destitute of all religious and moral instruction. We wish to say nothing harshly of his parents 5 but the gradual deteri- oration which has, of late jTars, taken place in the gene- ral character and condition of our labourers is a subject fraught with melancholy reflection. The situation of f the best and most virtuous amongst them can hardly be viewed without sorrow and regret. When fully employed, their wages are barely sufficient to afford them a inain- teixance^ and when overtakea with sickness and family ® S M W A S A B 3S Dxa-wnfromlafel):? E-TxeslOTL Trmteiljy CSuHnLaiiiel . 47 misfortune — or thrown into debt from the pressure of unavoidable circumstances — the poor peasant has no means of extricating himself — no alternative but to apply to the parish. The institution of a legal provision for the poor reflects honour upon the humanity of the country, but it loses its proper character, and ceases to be beneficial, when indiscriminately applied. It certainly never was contemplated by our ancestors, that agricul- tural labourers should receive part of their wages from the poor's box. This is an innovation of modern times; and one, we are sorry to say, which has obtained a foot- ing in this county. What can be more cruel or prepos- terous than that young able-bodied men should receive only six or seven shillings per week from the farmer, and be sent to the parish to make up the means of subsistence for themselves and families ? They are thus brought up in the degrading habit of dependence, and lose all self-estimation, industry, and regard for charac- ter ; whilst the poor shopkeeper or tradesman of ihe village is compelled to assist in paying the farmers' labourers. A system at once so short-sighted and ini- quitous must have tended materially to lower the na- tional character of our peasantry. Other causes have doubtless co-operated in no small degree ; but by making our labourers paupers — by doling out the same mite to the idle as to the industrious, — we destroy all motives to honest industry, and break the spirit of manly independence. Had Joshua Slade been early and habitually taught his duty to God and man, and received even a common education^ he could scarcely have failed in proving a 48 useful and intelligent member of society. He was natu- rally of quick and lively parts, and his progress in reli- gious knowledge during the short period of his impri- sonment was truly astonishing. He surprised all who visited him by the readiness and acuteness of his answers. Unfortunately, however, his mind was suf- fered to run waste, at the time when it was capable of receiving the strongest impressions. He saw nothing, that was good around him, and consequently had no check upon his evil inclinations. His natural activity, sought employment in fraud and cunnings and from his earliest years he was looked upon as a lad of suspicious cliaracter. The first open act of dishonesty in which he was detected occurred in his fourteenth year. A neigh- bour, Mrs. Bedford, having occasion one day to leave her house, locked the door, and deposited the key in a place where the different members of her family were accus- tomed to leave it for their mutual convenience. The action was observed by young Slade, who happened at the time to be working in an adjoining close. He instantly repaired to the house, opened the door, aud abstracted a sovereign from a bureau which stood in the room. On discovering their loss, Mrs. Bedford and family sus- pected Slade, and going to his father's cottage, taxed him with the theft. For some time the audacious boy denied it in the strongest terms 5 but on his father promising him a shilling if he gave up the money, he drew the sovereign from his pocket and laid it on his father's chair, when it was delivered to the owner. On this occasion, the mother of the boy remarked that it was a good job for hina, as he had got a shilling by it*.' ' 49 The propriety of such a remark, made at such a time, requires no comment. Yet who can peruse it without reflecting on the awful responsibility of parents, and the importance of early instruction and good example. Slade had previously been employed as a herd by the family whom, on the above occasion he robbed. When a boy he was distinguished for his obstinate, head-strong disposition 5 if spoken sharply to for any neglect, he would instantly run away, and it required some coaxing to make him return. His mother states that he would sometimes sleep in the fields for two or Ihiee nights together^, if offended at home. There was nothing, ac- cording to the testimony of his parents, that Joshua could not turn his hand to. Had he been a scholar," says his mother, he would have been -a forger'' In 1824, William Slade, the father, was turned out of his house, and his effects sold for debt 5 upon which he removed with his family to the neighbouring village of Little Stukeley, where he rented a small cottage belonging to Mrs. Eady, of Huntingdon. The overseers of his former parish paid the rent, and allowed the old man and his wife five shillings per week. Joshua was by this time grown a stout active youth, and though slightly made, was of a sinewy, muscular fiame, capable of enduring much fatigue. He now wont regularJy to work ) and, amongst others, was employed by the rec- tor of the parish, Mr. VVaterhouse. He was, we believe, a good industrious labourer, though but little esteemed by any of his employers. From November 1826, to May 1827, he was in the service of Mr Hall, farmer, of Little Stukeley, and conducted himself with general 50 propriety, till the last week of the above time, when Mr. Hall, detecting him in a petty theft, discharged him from his premises. This seems to have been the last place in which Slade was regularly employed. During the nine or ten weeks which intervened before the murder of Mr. Waterhouse, he did do work, with the exception of a day or two's mowing 5 and as his parents were unable to support him, he mu&t have chiefly sub- sisted on the property he had dishonestly acquired. On the day of the murder he was engaged to work with Mr. William Stanion^ but of course did not go. During the last year of his residence at Little 8tuke- ley, Slade contracted an intimacy with a fitting associate, William Heddings, of whom we have already given some account. HeddingsV close runs up almost to the door of Slade's cottage, and they had thus frequent oppor- tunities of meeting, and laying their plans together. The connexion of Slade with this incorrigible rascal confirmed him in vice, and completed his ruin. A companion of a different character might have weaned him from his vicious habits, and given a new direction to his mind ; but meeting with one hackneyed in the paths of crime, and insensible to all feelings of compunction, every moral barrier was broken down, and every restraint removed. Some of the robberies committed jointly by Slade and Heddings have already been detailed in the different examinations before the magistrates 3 and it is to be feared there were but too many others which have not yet been divulged. The natural courage and hardi- hood of Slade urged him on to greater lengths than his associate intended, but the latter never failed to reap 51 the pfincipal part of the bootj\ John Slacle, an eidef brother of Joshua, was joined to the party last Michael- mas 5 but he appears to have been a youth of better principle, aud was soon disgusted with the trade. Amongst the numerous persons in the county who experienced the nocturnal visitations of this gan^r^ Mr Waterhouse was perhaps the greatest sufferer. We have seen that Slade stole a variety of articles from the parsonage, amounting in all to about ^20., which he sold to Lansdale Wright. Heddings confessed that they one night entered the farm-yard of the rev gentleman, and drove off six pigs, which they took to Peterborough market and sold 5 and, strange to say, they were never missed by the unsuspecting rector. They were also possessed of a bunch of skeleton keys, twenty-seven in number, with which they could open every room in the house 5 and on Sunday mornings, duiing the time of divine service, Heddings and Slade frequently repaired to the parsonage, and regaled themselves on the ale and wine of tlie rector*s cellar. Often has this deluded minister, after being plundered, gone to Lucas, the parish constable, proceeded with him to the cottage of Slade's parents, and identified property of which he had been deprived. On these occasions, the peace-officer took possession of the discovered booty 3 immediately, however, on quitting this den of thieves, the venerable expounder usually remarked—^' Well, officer, here's your money ; Til let them rest this time 5 but if they sin again, I will not forgive them*' On searching the premises of Slade, after the murder, a sack and pow- der-flask, belonging to the rev, gentleman, were found 52 (ibncealed in the lhatch of the pig-stye 5 and a pair of handsome silver-mounted pistols, also belonging to Mr. Waterhouse, were picked up amongst the dung in the same phice. Slade himself confessed that he had hid the pistols in the thatch, thrusting up his arm as far as he could I and from this depository they had dropped into the soil. From the statements of his mother, it appears that Slade had stolen the pistols long before the time of the above robbery* Mr» Waterhouse missing them, in- formed Slade's sister (who then lived servant in the house) that some one had stolen his pistols, and would surely murder him. The girl, to appease his anxiety and perturbation, in a few days carried back the pistols, which she had found concealed in her mother's house. Her desperate and deluded brother, however, had again laid his hands on the dangerous instruments, meditating the commission of the atrocious crime which he was destined afterwards to accomplish. Nothing could exceed the determined character of Slade and his accomplices — wherever they went to plunder, they went also with the decided resolution of destroying any one who might chance to oppose them in the attainment of their object 5 and two or three individuals who suffered by their depredations, may congratulate themselves that they did not fall victims to the desperate courage of these rufRans.— The night that the house of Mr. Thomson, of Stow, was plundered, was at the time of the feast j and whilst the delinquents were busily epgaged inside, Mr. T, came home, and finding the door open and some tjiinga. 33. ^^splaced, immediately went (supposing some person had been robbing the house) to procure assistance 3 in the mean while^ the plunderers, being disturbed, made off, taking with them a bureau, which they carried to some distance and then ransacked. — ^At the time two ho^s were stolen from Mr. Goodliffe, of Wood Walton, Mr, G. has not a doubt but that he was crossing the yard at the moment they were in the styej but regarding the noise made by the hogs as nothing unusual, he fortu- nately did not proceed to ascertain the cause : had he discovered them, Slade declared it was their intention to have destroyed him.— On another occasion, Slade and Beddings, (together with one or tvyo other des- peradoes, whom the arm of the law has not yet reached) were one evening drinking in a public-house in Hunt- ingdon, when they observed a small farmer, who was also present, to have a considerable sum of money on him — they resolved to dispossess him of his cash, and going home immediately, they armed themselves with pistols, and secreted themselves in a part of the road which they knew he must pass on his way home- wards, determined to plunder him, even at the expense of bis life. Fortunately for the person alluded to, he had taken too much of Boniface's brown stout to brave the perils of the night, and was persuaded to take a bed at the house at which he had been drinking. — By this prudent step he probably saved his own life, and disappointed the rulBans of their expected booty. Some of our readers may recollect that at the time of the last General Election, the Rev. Mr. Fell, of Hunt- ingdon^ had a fat hog stolen from his premises, on the F 54 very night previous to the day on which it was intended to kill the animal. This well-timed theft was committed by the Stukeley gang 5 but being already burthened with the products of the night, gleaned from various quarters, they were unable to carry home the hog. They accordingly left it, tied down in a hamper, in a field near Huntingdon, where it was found some time afterwards literally starved to death. Every moonlight night was devoted by this infamous party to purposes of plunder, when sheep-folds, hen- roosts, and farm-yards were visited and ransacked 5 as the party consisted of several individuals, who w^ere adepts in the practice, the work of plunder lasted but a few seconds; and they generally escaped without.exciting any alarm. On returning at day-break from these noc- turnal depredations, laden with their booty, Heddings Hud the two Slades were frequently observed by the inhabitants of Little Stukeley 5 but, from a dread of en- countering their resentment, no one dared to become informer. Heddings asserted, while in prison, that he never saw a lock which he could not open, and under his tuition Slade attained to equal perfection in the art. He used to sit for hours in the little sleeping-room of his father's cottage, filing and preparing picklock keys, and when he heard his mother or sister coming up stairs, he would snatch up the apparatus of theft, and hide it in his box, or amidst the lumber of the room. There was no use in speaking to him/* to adopt the words of his parents, as he would answer only with oaths 5 aud he was grown too big and headstrong for correction/' Prom such a career, the closing scene of the life of this 55 desperate and unhappy youth might be safely prog- nosticated. A striking proof of the hardness of heart and callous- ness of feeling, which latterly characterised Slade, was afforded by the following incident, which took place a few days after the murder. Before his final apprehen- sion, he requested permission to take a farewell glance at the remains of Mr. Waterhouse. The body was then incoffined ^ but the lid was unscrewed to gratify the wish of the suspected murderer. He gazed upon it without the least visible emotion, remarking how *^ hardly the poor old gentleman had been dealt with/* and that it was impossible the tremendous wound on the jaw could have been inflicted with a knife !— The young woman who accompanied him to the coffin, and who related the incident to the writer of these pages, said she was so struck with the cold indifference of his manner, and his fiendish looks, as to be obliged to leave the room * His mother states that when he came home on tlie night of the murder, his face was flushed and red, and there was something uncommon in his looks and manner. She asked him where he had been all day ; be answ^ered at Godmanchester, seeing his sister 5 he felt poorly,^ he said, in the morning, and could not go to work. His mother then told him of the death of Mr. Waterhouse, and of the general opinion that he * An incident somewhat similar Is related in history of a much greater <;riminal. After the death of Charles I., a man deeply masked entered at midnight into the room where the body of the martyred monarch was de- posited, and after gazing on it intently for some time, remarked how well the body seemed formed for length of life ; and muttering the words, ••Cruel necessity/* retirtd. Lord Southampton ana others who were sitting with the corpse belieTed the visitor to be Oliver CromweU. 56 had been murdered. — Yes/* replied Joshua^ when f heard the news, I thought 1 should have swoundedJ' He afterwards said, that perhaps there were two persons concerned in the murder^ and one of them might im- peach against the other. In this cool deliberate strain of hypocrisy did the young but artful villain gloss over his guilt, His parents and other relatives^ believed from the first that Joshua was the murderer 5 but from their knowledge of his close malignant temper and dis- position^ none of them imagined that he would ever confess. We come now, in the regular course of our narrative to Crowded as our small town generally is during the week of the Assizes^, at no former period did it exhibit so large a concourse of strangers and visitors from the country as were assembled upon this occasion. The interest excited by the murder of Mr. Waterhouse has been correspondent w^ith the atrocity of the deed, and the infrequency of such occurrences. Thousands of per- sons of both sexes^ during the three foregoing weeks, visited the premises of the deceased, and though we have heard of no relics being carried away by pious strangers, as was the case at Gill's Hill, the gloomy passage in which the unfortunate gentleman breathed his last, with its bloodstained walls, and the surround- ing grounds through which the murderer escaped, have been traced by many an anxious and curious observer. It is difficult at all times to repress the efforts of idle, vulgar curiosity 5 and, perhaps, in cases of this kind. 57 like the Spartan exhibitions of drunkenness, its gratifi- cation may be attended with salutary results, Mr. Baron Garrow and Lord Chief Baron Alexander arrived on Saturday afternoon from Bedford. On Sun- day morning the learned judges attended divine service at St. Mary's church, where an excellent and highly ap- propriate sermon was preached by the Rev. Edward Theed, M.A. of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge. The text chosen by the rev, gentleman was that impres- sive portion of the Decaloigue, '*Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain 5'* in descanting upon \ihich the preacher drew a vivid picture of the gradual progress of \ice from its first dawnings in the human mind to its consummation in the crime of murder. He also pointed out with equal truth and eloquence the immense importance of an oath in the administration both of criminal and civil justice. About two o'clock the learned judges repaiied to the scene of the murder, and minutely examined the topo- graphy (if we may so speak) of the spot. The numerous stains of blood still remain, as we have hinted above, on the floor and walls 5 and the tub in which the deceased was found immediately after the murder maintained the same position in the corner. MONDAY, July 30th. At an early hour tliis morning, the Market-place in front of the Town -Hall, or Court House, was thronged with individuals anxious to witness the trial of Joshua Slade, which, it was confidently anticipated would come on to day. At nine o'clock Baroa Alexander entered the court, when a tremendous rush took place, and the F 2 '58 utmost anxiety was manifested to obtain admission. The court was instantly filled, but through the judicious arangements and personal superintendence of the under- sheriff (C. Margetts, Esq.) the inconvenience likely to result from a crowded court in such intensely hot wea- ther, was almost wholly obviated. The following noble- men and gentlemen were sworn on the GRAND JURY. Lord Viscount Makdeville, M.P. Foreman. Lord John Russell, M.P. W. H. Fellowes, Esq. M.P. John Heathcote, Esq. Lawrence Reynolds, Esq. Denzil Onslow, Esq. James Torkington, Esq. G. Thornhill, jun. Esq. John Bonfoy Rooper, Esq. John Carstairs, Esq. George Thompson, Esq. David Rowley, Esq. George Rust, Esq. T. W. Vaughan, Esq. W. Pears, Esq. John Maxwell, Esq. Samuel Newton, Esq. James Linton, Esq. Edward Theed, Esq. Castle Slierard, Esq. Richard Smith, Esq. David Veasey, Esq. Anthony M. Darnell, Esq. The Lord Chief Baron shortly addressed them -On one case in the calendar he thought it would be proper to offer a few observations. The case to which he allu- ded was one of murder, the greatest crime, certainl}^ which could be inflicted against human society. It was highly necessary that the evidence should be strong and clear before the prisoner could be convicted, or even put upon his trial. On the other hand, equal care should be taken that the ends of justice be not defeated by the escape of the prisoner. It was an important point for their consideration, that if the evidence was not sufficient to ensure conviction, and if the prisoner was acquitted, should any, even the clearest, evidence of his guilt be subsequently discovered, it would be of no avail 5 for the prisoner could plead that he had been 59 before tried aad acquitted on the same charge, and such a plea would in law be held to be insurmountable. Contrary to general expectation, the trial of Slade did not come on to day. The following cases were dis- posed of : — James May, aged 28, was indicted for petty larceny, in stealing on the 5th of July, a brass tap and some old metal, from the shop of Mr. Carrington, oi St. Neots, ironmonger, valued at 2s. 6d. — ISIot Guilty. John Blachwelly aged 35, for stealing two sheep, the property of Mr. Titchmarsh, of Hemingford AbboJs, — Guilty. — Death recorded, James Chandler, aged 25, for stealing an ewe sheep from Mr. Peppercorn, Eynesbury. — Guilty — Death recorded, Elijah Marshall, aged 58, was indicted for having, in conjunction with his son, broken into the dwelling house of Mr John Smith, grocer and draper, of Brough- ton, in this county, and stealing a large quantity of goods and money, to the amount of upwards of three hundred pounds. — The jury returned their verdict *^ that the pri- soner was guilty of having a part of the property in his possession, knowing it to have beeii stolen, but that he did not enter the house." The learned judge said, that as the prisoner was charged in the indictment with ha- ving burglariously entered the dwelling house, he must, from the verdict delivered by the jury, direct the prisoner to be acquitted, PFiUiam Apethorpe, aged 20, was found guilty of stealing a cake of the value of 4s. and a metal ring, the property of Thomas Richards, of Offord Darcy, and 60 sentenced to nine months* imprisonment and hard labour. — It is more important to the purpose of this narrative to state, that the Grand Jury found no true bill against fVilliam Slade, aged 64, and Elizabeth Slade, aged 56, charged with feloniously receiving a gun and other pro- |)erty from Joshua Slade. No true bill against Lansdale Wright, for feloniously receiving divers goods and chattels, the property of the representatives of the late Rev* Joshua Waterhouse. TUESDAY, July 31st. Ctlal of 3lo0!iuai %uy$t. Exactly at nine o'clock this morning. Lord Chief Baron Alexander entered the Court, and shortly after- wards Slade was placed at the bar. Amongst the company present we observed Lord Mandeville, his brother Lord William Montagu, Lord John Russell, Mr. Fellowes, Sec. Reporters for the Local Press, and for the following London papers, were also in attend- ance — The Times, Courier, Morning Chronicle, Morning Herald, Sun, and Standard. The Court was crowded to excess, but the utmost silence prevailed. Our readers are already acquainted with the extreme youth of the prisoner: he was only 18 years of age. He was about 5 feet 6 inches in height, and of a slight make. His complexion was of a dark sun-burnt hue, to which his solitary confinement had imparted a sallow tinge. The general character of his countenance was that of stupid hardihood and insensibility 5 but on closer inspection, there appeared something extremely villainous in the expression of his eyes — ^his upturned nose, low forehead, and beetling eyebrows^ Vfhdh were slightly arched and met in the centre. The Clerk of the arraigns, Mr, Edgell, read the indictment, charging him, in the emphatic phraseology of the law, with having wilfully murdered the Rev, Joshua Waterhouse, clerk, in Little Stukeley, in this county, on the 3d day of July, instant, by felooionsly assaulting the said Joshua Waterhouse, and giving him several mortal wounds, of which he languished a short time and then died. The prisoner manifested not the slightest emotion or concern during the whole of the trial. On being asked in the usual manner, whether he was guilty or not guilty, he deliberately replied not guilty." The following jury was then sworn : — William Bedford, jun, Earith. Richard Bedford, Ramsey. Thomas Beeton, sen. Ramsey. "William Behagg, Ramsey. William Bradley, Alwalton. William Butler, Ramsey. John Catling, Ramsey. Henry Cope, Buckden. John Day, Ramsey. James Darlow, Ramsey. Richard Fox, Brampton. Joseph Garratt. Mi\ Serjeant Storks, with whom was Mr. Maltby and Mr. Kunt for the prosecution, opened the case, in a calm and temperate speech, delivered with great ear- nestness and impressiveness of manner, — Standing, he said, as lie did, in the situation of a public prosecutor, he was anxious to pay homage to the benevolent adminis- tration of the laws of his country, by abstaining from all inflammatory statements. He was anxious to present a gim pie, cold narrative of facts. In the same spirit he trusted that the jury would forget every thing that they might have heard to the prejudice of the prisoner, — and anxiously guard themselves against even the ordinary m sympalliies of their natures. He trusted that they would regulate their verdict altogether according to the force and distinctiveness of the evidence to be adduced before them, and would, in deciding upon the fate of a fellow creature, remember that they were in the presence of that Being without whose knowledge not even a sparrow can fall to the ground. The deceased, Mr. Waterhouse, was the rector of Little Stukeley. From early disap- pointment, or from eccentric habits, he had separated himself from society 3 living in a large house fit for the accommodation of a gentleman in his station of life, he had not only neglected his residence, but had devoted the greater part of it to various agricultural purposes, and confined himself to two rooms and a bed-room, and latterly almost to one only. He had had various ser- vants whom he had dismissed, and lately was without any. A char-uoman and girl came to do what was necessaiy in his domestic department, and two boys to attend to his pigs. His habits were to rise early, and to live with his servants in the kitchen — to breakfast at an early hour, and then to betake himself to — what seemed almost the sole business of his life— •his farming concerns. On the morning of the 3d of July he arose as usual aud breakfasted 5 about nine o'clock he drew some beer and rinced out the mug, the last act he was seen to perform. The boys were ordered to go and look after the pigs, and the woman and girl were ordered to betake themselves to the field, which they did. About half-past ten the boys returned to take their luncheon which they brought with them from thir homes —-they went into the kitchen, and out of the kitcheu 63 there is a passage, and in the passage there was a \drg4 tubr— hanging over the sides of this tub they saw the legs of Mr. Waterhouse. Some extraordinary operation of mind instantly took place — they were struck with invo-* luntary fear, but they had no defined notion of what had taken place. They went over to the other side of the street to a person's house of the name of Whitney. Shortly after came up to the door a person of the name of Rogers, with a horse, which he fastened to the gate, and went to the kitchen door 3 the dog barking fiercely he struck it a violent blow, and the dog returned into his kennel He knocked at the door, but received no answer 5 and during the time he Ptood there he heard some indistinct noise as he thought of some persons going up and down the stairs. Alarm was excited, and others came to the spot — the house was entered, and then was found the dead body of Mr. Waterhouse, he having just previously breathed his last. At this time his body was quite warm. Upon examining it, it was found he had received a violent blow on the jaw, and his neck was in a dreadfully mangled state. Upon such an occurrence as this, of course universal alarm was spread at once. In the bame village lived the prisoner at the bar, in a cottage not far from the parsonage ; he lived with his father and mother, two brothers, a sister, and a person whom he should call before them of the name of Sykes. Suspicion lighted on the prisoner 5 inquiry was set on foot, and he was called upon to give an account of himself at the time of the murder. He stated that he had been to his sister's, at Godraanchester, to invite her to Stukeley feast — that he was at a public house at m Huntingdon, and at a public house also at Godmanche^^^ ter> and his sister was called upon to confirm this account. He should prove to the jury, that at one o'clock in the morning he left the public house at Stuke- leyj at three o'clock in the morning, a person, whose walk and dress resembled the prisoner's (and he should prove that his gait or walk was remarkable) was seen to approach the garden gate of the parsonage 5 the de- ceased keeping a key of the gate, and that key being usually deposited in a particular place on the wall 3 the person who was seen to approach the gate appeared to look for that key and not to find it 5 he was then seen to get over the wall. There were also some prints of footsteps seen 5 but that part of the case he should leave to the witnesses to state. He was anxious not to make any undue impression 5 there were prints of footsteps to be seen near the wiudow^, and at a particular stile i About ten o'clock in the morning was seen at some dis- tance a person in dress resembling the prisoner at the bar, coming from the direction of the house 3 he was seen to go under a tunnel, and not to leave it. The prisoner at the bar had lived in the service of Mr. Wa- terhouse, and so also had his sister, but had been dis- missed from his service 5 the premises of the deceased must, therefore, be well known to him. After suspicion had fallen upon the prisoner, and his statements proved false, other examinations took place. His dress was examined, and marks of blood were found in various parts of it — the prisoner attempted to account for this by saying he had cut his finger, and wiped the blood on his clothes. A further investigation took place 3 and 65 belongitig to a man who lived as a part of the same family with the prisoner, of the name of Sykes, was found a wood man *s bill. He had used it in the spring-^ he had then carefully cleaned it and deposited it in a cupboard-^ he had not himself removed it. There are no outlets in the cottage of the father by which anybody cati have access to the cupboard excepting through the bouse. A person must pass through the keeping-room to get to the outbuilding. This bill was found in a state which he (the learned Sergeant) should not describe — it would be produced before them. The prisoner was taken up, and when he went to gaol he was asked to produce the knife he said his mother had got it — that was false — it was found upon him, and it had marks upon it resembling blood. This was the circumstantial part of the case 5 a»d before he introduced to them a piece of evidence of the greatest weight and importance ~and in the introduction of that witness he was anxious not to deceive them as it respected his character. He would put into the witness-box a person of the name of Heddings — they would hear from him the detail of what passed between hiia and the prisoner. At the termina- tion of the second meeting of the coroner's inquest, the prisoner at the bar and Heddings were seen together. Heddings would narrate what the nature of the conver- sation was, if they could believe him 5 and he (Sergeant S.) hardly knew that he ought to say so, for he was not concerned in this transaction, nor suspected 5 and he should distinctly prove that it was impossible that he could be present at the murder. The prisoner was told what Heddings had said ; he answered, if he had 6 66 known what Heddings had been about^ he wonid have done his business for him. The learned Sergeant then said, he had no doubt that the Jury would most con- scientiously and most religiously do their duty. If they eventually entertained no doubt of the guilt of the pri- soner, they would by their verdict deliver him to the justice of the country j butif they had any doubt, they would, in conformity with the benevolent disposition of the country's laws, acquit him, Mr. Taylor, a barrister present, with a feeling of humanity which did him great honour, here offered his services to the prisoner, in questioning any of the wit- nesses that might appear. Ann Gale examined—" I live at Great Stukeley. On the 1st of July last, I was at work at the house of Mr, VVaterhouse, on the day he lost his life. I came in the morning at half-past five o'clock. He was up, and in the first kitchen, sitting on a chair 5 no other person was in the house. The second kitchen is at the end of a passage eight or ten yards long, which leads from one kitchen to the other. The passage is light when the garden door is open, I went through the passage to the dairy for some milk. I can't say if the first door v/as shut. On going to the garden door 1 passed a staircase on the left hand 5 that staircase can be seen from the garden door. I remember a beggar called that morning, and I saw no other person. After I left the dairy, I took my breakfast, and put the tea-things away. Mr. Waterhouse was still sitting in his chair. A little girl came to work at seven o'clock, and the girl went with, me to work in a field about half-past nine 67 o*clock. We were withia call of any person at the house. We returned at eleven o'clock to the house, having been sent for. A great many persons were there. I saw Mr. Waterhouse a corpse in the passage, lying against the side of a tub." Cross-examined — The beggar came about an hour before I went to the field. Mr. Waterhouse said to the beggar, ' What do you want ^— be off about your busi- ness.' The beggar said he was unwell ; he appeared to be a stout-looking man. Mr. Waterhouse ordered him off, and told him he had nothing to give him. I never before saw any sturdy beggars asking alms at the house of Mr. Waterhouse,*' William Parker, a boy employed as a labourer by Mr. Waterhouse, said, that between nine and ten o'clock on the morning of the murder, after Mrs. Gale had left the house, his master came into the brew-house, and asked him about some sacks. The brew-house is across the yard, over against the kitchen door. A little before eleven, witness went into the house along with Reuben Briggs, to eat his victuals. They sat down on a form in the front kitchen, when they saw Mr. Waterhouse's legs hanging over a tub in the passage. They heard him, and went and told two persons, who came back to the house with them. Mr. Waterhouse's dog, which was tied to a kennel near the kitchen door, had barked almost all the morning : it left off when witness had seen his master in the tub. Cross-examined — I saw the beggar, who called and asked for charity that morning 5 his head was bound up, and he looked like a sailor. I saw him go away. He was not very near the passage.'* 68 Frederick Rogers — " I went to Mr. Ashby% m Stukeley, in July last, and afterwards to the house of Mr. Waterhouse. 1 got there abont eleven o'clock. I entered at the yard-door. There was a dog tl^ere about three feet from the door (I speak of the door which leads out of the kitchen into the yard). The dog wa& barking before and at the tinje I entered the yard* I stood at the door, and thought I heard something like blows in the passage. I then rapped at the door with my w hip three times very sharply. I heard what ap- peared to me to be two persons coming down stairs ^ and I rapped again three times, sharper than before. I heard nothing after 1 had rapped again. I had been at Mr. Waterhous^j's twelve months before, and had been ^n the house. I did not know where the back stairs were situated. I rapped again and stood at the door for soncie time, when two boys came across the yard, and I called Harrison. He objected to go into the house. 1 entered alone, and saw the boys at the kitchen door. I crossed the back kitchea, and went through the inside door, which leads to the pas^sage. The door was open, and I observed Mr. WaterhoBse's legs hang* ing oyer the tub j I called to Mr, Waterhouse by name three times > and receiving no answer, I went back, and afterwards other persons entered with me.** Cross examined—** About three or four minutes elapsed after I entered the yard> and before I saw Mr. Waterhouse*s legs hanging over the tub. The blows I heard appeared to sound as if given by a fist on the face of some person, I saw nobody about the premises/* A plan of the deceased's bouse and grounds was li^ijft put in by Mr. Lovell, surveyor * HuntingSo^^ ^ 69 ' William Ashby— I know Mr. Waterhouse*s house j was going past about eleven o'clock ; went into the firsst kitchen, and, in consequence of something I had heard, I went into the passage, and saw Mr. Waterhouse lying in the tub. The garden door was shut, and the passage dark 5 I called out, ^ Mr. Waterhouse, what do you do here?' and took hold of his hand, and pulled him up- right. A young woman had followed, and I told her to come in, for he was not dead. The garden door was opened, and two women helped to get him out of the tub. My arm felt wet > 1 thought it had been swill, as he had fallen into the swill-tub, but found that it was blood. When we had laid him on the floor, I saw a large gash on the cheek, and one or two on the hands." Cross-examined — *^ Have seen a great number of tramps about his premises, i did not see a beggarman that morning near the houpe of Mr, W, j the dog com- monly barked when [Msrso as entered the gate/* Mary Ann Briggs—- 1 live at Little Stukeley, and recollect the morning of the day Mr. Waterhouse lost his life 5 Mr. Ashby called me in 3 I saw him standing in the passage, and holding the old gentleman's hand. Mr, Ashby told me to open the garden door ; I pushed it open, for it was not fastened 5 1 then went to Mr. Ashby, and took hold of Mr. Waterhonse*s hand, and felt his forehead J it was quite warm, as was also his hand, and lithsome j when on the floor, I unbuttoned his shirt collar j the blood came out in flakes, as large as my fingers j on his person there were three or four wounds, on his breast, arms, hands, and face — his jaw was divided, and I could have wrung the blood out of his handkerchief." h cm u 70 ' Jonah Wilson, Esq. examined by Mr. Sergeant Storks.-^*' I am a surgeon at Huntingdoo, and hav« been for 18 years. I saw the deceased at four o*clock on the day he lost his life. 1 found a large wound across the throat, three inches deep, extending deep on the right side, which separated the tongue from the windpipe J and found a large hole at the right side of the windpipe." By the Judge — " One of the wounds appeared to have been made by a stab, and the other was an incised wound 5 the whole of the interior of the neck had been severed by some sharp instrument ; there was a tremen- dous wound on the right cheek, given in a longitudinal direction ; the jaw was divided, and the upper part fractured j it must, of necessity, have been inflicted by some heavy cutting instrument. I examined the hands j Ihe right wrist was cut across, and the left was cut in a similar manner, and pieces of flesh hung down, and flapped towards the elbow. The fingers and hands were niuch cut. The right elbow was cut in two, and the injury appeared to have been inflicted with the same instrument with which the jaw was divided. There was an injury on the chest, which appeared to have been given by the back of an axe or the back of a bill. I am of opinion that the wounds were not all inflicted bv the same instrument." By Mr. Sergeant Storks—** The immediate cause of the death of the deceased was the wound on the throat. It was impossible that the wou^d could have been in- flicted by the deceased's own hands. I saw the prisoner on the Thursday, ten days after the m^irder, when he was brought up for examination. I examined him rai- mitely. I was struck with the appearance of histfoasers • down the front. He wore slop fustian trousers and jacket, of a dirty brown colour, and a blue cravat j the -front of his trousers, I noticed, had a dark greasy shi- ning appearance. It struck me, but not at that moment, that it was blood and dirt rubbed together. The next morning I examined the prisoner's dress and person in Mr. Waterhouse*s house. 1 look tjim into a room and desired him to take off his trousers, that I might exa- mine the inside surface> and 1 distinctly discovered blood, which had gone through the fustian or cloth. There was no wound about that part of the prisoner's person to have caused the bloody stain j there was a little scratch about one of his knees, but that could not have produced ihe stain , There were stains about one of Ihs knees, but I could not say they were caused by blood, though I could swear the stain on the left thigh of the trousers was from blood. The prisoner accounted ■ for it by saying that he had cut his finger, which had bled profnsely, and] he had pot some salt upon it, and had staunched it against the thigh of his trousers. I examined his jacket on the Sunday following, and his shoes three days ago j I found a large stain of blood on the inner side of the covering of the skirt of his jacket, and also a stain on the inner side of the left shoulder j the right thigh of the trousers appeared to me to have been washed, or some liquid put upon it to take out the stain. I saw a bill produced in the justice-room, and also a knife 5 I observed that there appeared at the end of the bill some hair and animal matter, and there ap- peared to be blood. I examined the bill with a magni- 72 fying glass, and could discover grey-coloured human hair and blood, and dirt appeared to have been put oa afterwards^ I knew Mr. Waterhouse — he was an old man, and had gray hair, and the hair on the bill corres- ponded. There were several cuts on the tub 5 they must have been given with great violence, and, in my opinion, with a bill. I think I might venture to swear that the handle of the bill, which was willow, was stained with blood. When I was examining the pri- soner's trousers on the Friday morning, I said, ' Slade, this is biood j decidedly blood, on both sides of your trousers.' His manner was a great deal hurried, and he appeared to be lost for a few minutes. He said, * Yes, it is blood , it came by the cut on my finger.' I said, * then it is for your benefit and for the interests of justice that you establish an alibi, for this is evidently blood." Cross-examined — I said the only mark of blood I could swear to was on the left side of the trousers, and the prisoner gave a very probable cause for it. It is a very difficult thing to swear to blood, To the best of my belief it was human hair on the bill, and there was some stain on the handle. What I thought was human hair might have been the hair of a sheep's face, but it was not wool. There was a great deal of blood in the tub and on the wall. The deceased had struggled very much, and had made very great resistance. There was an artery cut, and the throat cut across, and a great deal of blood must have flowed. The deceased was near six feet high 5 he was infirm and stooped. The prisoner might have inflicted the wounds, and forced the decea- 73 $ed into the tub without his clothes being vei'y much spotted with biood. In my opinion, the wounds on the bands and wrists were inflicted before the deceased's throat was cut. I think, most probably, the deceased received the blow on the chest which forced him into the tub, and from the position of the body, the b-ood might not spout much, and life might in consequence have been extended. I think the deceased's throat was cut after he was knocked into the tub." W. Francis stated, that he was playing at bowls at the Swan public-house, in Stukeley, the night before the murder, in company with the prisoner and William Wright. They had a good deal of liquor. The prisoner and witness left the house together between one and two o'clock in the morning } the prisoner went towards the church in the way to his own house. Witness on the Monday after the murder accompanied a person named Woods into Mr. Waterhoiise's field— went across the field— the grass was not then mowed—there is a stile and a ditch j but no planks. Witness crossed first, and saw the print of the toe or shoe left in the bank of the ditch, they compared it with the shoe they had with them, which belonged to the prisoner, and the footmarks .exactly corresponded with the nails in the shoe — they were worn away on the left side. This close leads to a place called the Tunnel, which crosses the road. The prisoner had then a darker-coloured jacket on than he now wore. Peter Sabey — "i live at Little Stukeley 5 my house is about fifty yards from Mr. Waterhouse*s residence, and forty yards from his garden gate. 1 know the prj» 74 soner 5 1 have a strong suspicion of him ; I have known him three or four years 5 and have often seen him ^ he has something particular in his walk, he lobs a little in his gait j he generally wore a light jacket, I got up at a quarter before three o'clock on the morning that Mr. Waterhouse was killed ) I went to my door, and saw a man walk about forty yards up to Mr. Water- house's gate, who wore a short slop, or a jacket 5 when the person arrived at the gate, he fumbled a little on the wall, where a key used to be placed by Mr. Water- house ; the man got on the wall, and turned towards the htables. 1 heard the dog in Mr. Waterhouse's yard bark once. The man lobbed a little in his gait, and appeared to be a young man, about five feet six inches in height. My opinion was, that it was the prisoner Slade 5 but I did not see his features, and could not swear it was him. He came in a direction from the public-house, and not from old Slade's house,** By M r Taylor—*' I cannot swear to him 5 I only believe it was the prisoner.'' By the Judge — '* 1 did not see that the man had any instrument under his coat or frock 3 I did not discern it. The man fumbled with his right hand on the wall.'* By Mr. Taylor — " 1 do not recollect seeing other per- sons with a lob gait like the prisoner 5 there are many lame beggars about the neighbourhood at times,*' Ann Elby deposed, that as she and another female were on the road between Great and Little Stukeley, about half past ten o'clock on the day the murder was committed, she saw a young man coming in a direction from Mr. Waterhouse's house: the man went under a 75 tunuel or bridge, at tho end of which there is a deep dyke, with hedges and trees growing : he remained there. The man had a black hat> and wore a short frock or jacket. Witness had kuow^n the prisoner two years : knew his person well. John Crane said, that on one occasion the prisoner, talking about Mr. Waterhouse having been robbed before, said that he could undo all the locks of Mr> Wa^* terhouse's premises, and also of the premises of Mr. Hall, his employer, John Richardson examined — " J am a constable. I had the prisoner in custody. When I asked him to account for himself on the day of the murder, he told me that he had been at the Swan, at Little Stukeley, on the Monday evening preceding, playing at bowls until one or two o'clock in the morning — that he then went towards Godmanchester to invite his sister to Stukeley feast, and slept in a hay-field by the way, and got to Godmanchester about half-past seven : that he break- fasted with his brother and sister 5 after breakfast bis brother went to his work : that he left Godmanchester about half-past ten o'clock, but called at the Rose and Crown, Godmanchester, and got some beer 3 then cal- led at the Horse and Jockey, at Huntingdon, and had some beer there. He then said he set off towards Little Stukeley — again slept in a hay-field, and got home to Stukeley about half-past seven. — I afterwards took the prisoner to the Horse and Jockey, on Friday, and enquired of the landlord if prisoner had any beer there on the preceding Tuesday, and desired all the persons who were in the habit of drawing beer to come forward. 76 for prisoner to say who drew it.* Prisoner pointed to the girl, and said that she had drawn it. The girl utterly denied it, or that he was there at all on the Tues- day. The landlady was up stairs, and asked us to wait till she came down. When she came, she said, • Oh, it is you, is it ? I know you very well, by your pug nose, you have not been here since you was here with Hawkes, and drank wine.' I then took him to the Rose and Crown, at Godmanchester 5 saw the landlady. Slade said it was her who drew the beer ; she asked him where he sat, he said by the clock 5 she answered she drew nothing on the Tuesday morning for any body sitting there, but had for an elderly person near the door. I went to the Swan, they said they had not seen prisoner there. Was present with Mr. Cole and the prisoner on Monday the 9th — had a conversation relative to a knife 5 I said, ' Slade you had a knife, where is it V Prisoner then gave it me. I had previously asked him for his watch and knife, and he said he had given it to his mother — searched his mother's house but could not find it. 1 again went back to the prisoner and asked him what he had done with it ? he immediately took it from his pocket and gave it to me, also the watch, which he took off a shelf. On searching the house, I found a bill-hook in the room, and brought it to Mr. Sweeting — I gave the shoes to Butler." Mr. Butler and Mr Woods stated that they had com- pared the shoes with foot-marks under a window in Mr. Waterhouse's garden, and they corresponded as nearly as possible. There were similar marks along a path leading from the house toward* the tunnel. There were 77 two rows of nails on one side of the shoes, and none on the other, one side being much worn. On their cross- examination^ the witnesses said, that many husband- men have shoes worn on one sidej and shoemakers in that neighbourhood make many shoes off the same block, and also nail them similarly, Thomas Sykes, who lived in the same house as Slade, said that in March last, after the bean-sowing, he put the bill he had used into a cupboard. He first scoured it to prevent its rusting. He had not used it since. He could not say whether the prisoner slept at home the night before the murder. Mr. Wilson, the surgeon, re-called to examine the knife taken from the prisoner, said, There is a mark on the blade. The iron is corroded by some matter of a red colour. I know that animal matter in a decompo- sed state suddenly corrodes and eats into iron.*' Mr. Cole re-examined — *^ I was in the gaol when the prisoner and Mr. Orridge, the gaoler of Cambridge, were present : Mr. Orridge asked the prisoner several questions, and particularly about the blood on the knife : the prisoner said, ^ They were all cursed fools, and did not know what blood was when they saw it 5 and if he had known Heddings would have split against him, he would have done his business for him.' Mr. Wilson re-examined-^" The knife produced is just such an instrument as I should conceive was most likely to inflict the wound I saw in the deceased's throat." Cross-examined — " Other instruments of a similar shape and size would inflict such a wound. I believe the corrosion on the knife is caused by coloured animal H 7a matter 5 the blood of a sheep would produce the same effect." William Barker, a constable, deposed, that the pri- soner first told him that, on his return from Godmau- chester he lay down in a hay-field near Stukeley, and he did not hear of the murder till he got home. He said the reason he left Stukely was. because the people there were against him, and they would all hang him if they could ; and he also left, becaupe he was fearful he should be taken up on suspicion of the murder of Mr. Water- house. He afterwards said, " Now 1 will tell you the true story : when 1 left the public-house at Little Stuke- ley, on Monday, after playing at bowls, I went to a hay- field at Stukeley, and lay down all that day." William Stanion and Henry Hills, two labourers, were working with Heddings on the day of the murder. They were mowing all day, first at Mr. Maile's park, against Hinchingbrook, and afterwards at Mrs. Gim- ber's. They saw Slade and Heddings go together into the Swan, on the night of the inquest 5 they did not talk more than two minutes. Robert Merry saw Slade and Heddings together on Wednesday evening. Josh, said, * are you dry } will you go and drink?* and they went into the Swan. They had not a hundred yards to ^o, Nathaniel Maile, Hall-keeper, produced the bill, shoes, and clothes. The bill was found in a lower roorn^ in Slade*s cottage 3 it was not concealed, but stood near a cupboard, which the witness Sykes said was always locked, and no one used it but himself. The bill was the same he put by, but not so clean. 1^ Mr. Wilson said there was certainly a mark of blood on the bill, and there appeared to be wool or hair on its point 5 it looked to him like hair and wool mixed toge- ther : it would inflict the wound he saw onlhe face and jaw of the deceased. If used to slaughter a sheep, the same appearance would be visible on the bill. The clothes were stained with blood, but he could not say how long it had been on : he saw them in less than a week after the murder. The witnesses who compared the prisoner's shoes with the footmarks were recalled j and they stated, that the examination did not take place till the Monday after the murder. The Lord Chief Baron said, he did not think the evidence as to the footmarks would go for much, because the prisoner, before and after the murder, might have gone innocently along the road leading to the stile and the tunnel. William Beddings was then called, and stood up in the dock beside Slade. His appearance caused a strong sensation in court. He is a sleek, good-looking fellow. Examined by Sergeant Storks — 1 come from the gaol to the box 5 I am the William Heddings against whom a bill has been found for a felony, and who am to be tried. Have been much acquainted with prisoner for a twelvemonth. Have been with prisoner several times* I am thirty-six years old, a labourer, and married. I live at Stukeley, and recollect the day of the murder, I saw the prisoner on the Sunday preceding the murder j had not seen him the whole week previous. I first met Slade at harvest-work at Mr. Waterhouse's. Saw him 80 on Wednesday night after the murder, on the high road ; 1 was coming from the inquest when I saw Slade 3 he was standing with a good many more people 3 I jogged him on the elbow, and called him to one side 5 the people were within four or five yards of us, and could not hear. I asked Slade what he thought of this con- cern. He said, ' I don't know.' I said, * D — n it, how came you to lay hands on him ?' He answered, ' I was forced 3 1 was in the low kitchen a plundering. Mr. Waterhouse came in and caught me, and resisted my coming out 3 when I went to come out, he catched hold of me. Having nothing to defend myself with, I drew my knife, and then began to stab him, and cut him where I could 3 he then called out murder," and 1 got him down on the floor 3 I then got myself a weapon/ " Judge— Did he tell you w^hat weapon ? Witness — No, my lord. * I then hit him a blow on the face and knocked him down again. 1 then hit him several blows over the arms, and where I could, to prevent his getting up again. I then heard the dog bark vehemently at the door 3 I went to see if there was any person coming. 1 then, seeing nobody coming, came back to Mr. Waterhouse again. I then struck him another hard blow on the head, and knocked him into the tub. I then ran out at the garden door. I ran down the close of grass leading to Great Stukeley.' — This was what Slade told me. After this, Slade and I went into the Sw^an, and had a pint of ale with John Hawkes, of Huntingdon.'* Cross-examined by the Lord Chief Baron. — " Slada said all that I have mentioned in two minutes. I cannot read or write.** ?81 Judge.— ^Prisoner, will yoa a«k this man arty ques- tions ? Prisoner— He has told a false story, my Loid. t wAl tell you the question he put to me. Lord Chief Baron.— You will be allowed to say what you like in your defence, and may now put any question. The prisoner here made a communication to his counsel. Witness continued. — Stanion, Merry, and Hills, came out with me from the Bell public-house just before 1 saw the prisoner, and saw me talk to him.** Cross-examined by Mr. Taylor. — I do not know what is the offence I am charged with, except by the calendar. I see by it that I am charged with stealing a pig. 1 have been in gaol before. I was once convicted capitally of a burglary, and afterwards broke prison. I can't tell who the persons were who stood by Slade when I saw him near the Swan public-house. I ask- ed him what he thought of the concern. I never had any conversation with the prisoner on the subject before. I know a person named Wright 5 i never told the pri- soner that I suspected Wright had committed the mur- der. I mean to say that all this conversation took place on the road, before 1 went into the Swan public-house with the prisoner. I had not heard much of the evi- dence on the inquest 5 1 had been in the room, and was called upon to give an account to the Jury where I was at the time of the murder. I'he place where I stood when this conversation took place was about 16 yards from the Swan J 1 stood on the road during this con- 82 Versation j Merry and Hills were six or seven yards off, and they stood there during the whole of the conversation between myself and the prisoner. I know the house and grounds of Mr. Waterhouse very well j if a person had struck three times loudly against the door with the butt end of a whip, he must have been heard in the passage. Mr. Taylor — What do you expect to get by convict- ing this man } Witness — I don't know. Mr. Taylor — Don't you expect that the Crown will ^how you mercy in the offence of which you are charged, if Slade shall be convicted } Witness — I hope so. This was the case for the prosecution. The Lord Chief Baron here directed Stanion to be re-called, and examined him. The witness stated that he heard no conversation between Slade and Beddings before Slade asked Heddings to go into the Swan. Slade and Heddings might have had a few words before they went into the Swan, but witness did not see them talk together. Witness did not stop more than two minutes in the whole. Henry Hills was also re-called, and re-examined by his Lordship — saw Slade and Heddings together on the Wednesday evening before they went into the Swan y they seemed to be about five minutes together before they went into the Swan 5 tliey seemed to be talking tog<;ther« Merry re-called — *^ 1 heard Slade, upon the occasion mentioned, say to Heddings, ' Are yoa thirsty ?' and 83 they went immediately to drink. 1 am convinced that this was the only conversation which took place between them. Heddings did not take Slade aside j if there was any taking, it was Josh, (the prisoner) that took Hed- dings aside into the Swan." The Lord Chief Baron then addressed the prisoner, and told him if he had any thing to represent to the court and jury, it would be patiently heard. Prisoner. — I saw Heddings come from the Bell, as I was in the Swan along with John Hawkes. Hawkes said, 'Tell Heddings to come in.* I went out to him and tapped him on the shoulder 5 he said, * What do yon think of this concern V I said, ' I don't know.* He said, * I have a strong suspicion of old Wright * These were his very words. He then said, ' I am sorry the old man is dead 5 I would as leave half the parish had died as him, for I counted on having a quarter of barley from him this week.' Hawkes can prove that 1 was in the Swan, and only went out for a minute to call Heddings to have some drink.'* Judge — Is Hawkes here ? Prisoner — I don't know, my lord. Hawkes was then called, but did not appear. Mrs. Garner, landlady of the Swan, was then called, and answered to the following questions, which Slade put to her with great coolness. Prisoner — Was not John Hawkes and myself at your house on Wednesday night ? Witness — You and Heddings were there. Prisoner — Don't you remember Hawkes had a basket and fowls with him r Witness — O yes, I do remember it now. 84 Judge — Do you remember whether the prisoner went !o call Heddinj^s } Witness — Heddings and he came in together. Prisoner— You know I cut my finger ? Witness — You took up the bread, and was going lo cut it» and cut your finger and thumb. Judge — When was that? Witness— On the Monday-week before the murder. Examined by Mr. Taylor — I know there is such a person as Lansdale Wright. Hawkes, Slade, and Heddings had two pints of beer, and not one only, as stated by Heddings." The Lord Chief Baron then proceeded to charge the jury. It was his misfortune to address them on one of the most siiifi^ular cases of which he had ever heard or read. It had happened on this, as on all occasions which excited the public interest in a high degree, that the public papers and public conversation were filled with a great variety of rumours tending to excite differ- ent impressions in regard to this transaction, and to pro- duce a powerful prejudice against the prisoner at the bar. It was, however, the duty of the jury (and it was his Lordship's duty to point it out to them) to weed out of their hearts and understandings all the notions which they might have formed upon this extraordinary case, and which were not supported by the evidence which had been adduced. — The case entirely, or mainly, rested upon the evidence of William Heddings. Without his evidence, the case would have consisted entirely of cir- cumstances, and those circumstances so slight, and hanging so loosely together, that without the evidence of that person they would never be considered by an English jury as a sufficient ground on which to convict an English subject. His Lordship then proceeded to recapitulate the evidence, which he read with the utmost patience, commenting as he went along upon every pas- sage. At length, upon coming to the testimony of Hed^ dings^ his Lordship paused, and said, that he was anx- ious to point out to the jury a fact which he had obser- ved in the progress of the case, and which had produ- ced a powerful effect upon his mind. It appeared that Heddings was on the 16th July before the Magistrates, giving evidence upon the subject of this murder, and it was a most extraordinary circumstance that the evidence which he gave then not only corresponded in substance with that which he had delivered to-day in the box, but was delivered in the same order, and, with a slight exception, in the identical words which he had made use of sixteen days ago. There was not a word, not a pause, different in the two accounts, except the omission of a very short passage. This was certainly remarkable in a person without education, and gave to his evidence the semblance of a prepared story. There uas a mystery hanging about the transaction which nothing but the all- scrutinizing eye of Providence could bring to light j and if the jury should believe that there was not evidence to warrant them in coming to the conclusion that the pri- soner was guilty, he trusted that ere long the real cri- mimal would be brought to justice. His Lordship concluded about half-past six o'clock, when the jury requested permission to retire. They returned in about twenty minutes, and^ through their foreman, returned a verdict of GUILTY, 86 FrOiri the turn winch the case seemed to take (luring the latter part of the trial, and from the summing up of the Judge, a verdict of acquittal was generally anticipated. The Loud Chief Baron then put on the fatal cap, and pronounced sentence of death : — Joshua Slade, you have been indicted for the murder of this unhappy old gentleman, in w hose service you appear to have been j to that indictment you pleaded not guiUy, and for your deliverance put yourself upon God and your country; uhich country, after a long, patient, and im- ])artial trial, has found you guilty. This is one of the greatest offences that can be committed against the social order, and is contrary to every law, human and divine, i know what your feelings must be at the pre- sent moment, and I will not aggravate them. It becomes you to address yourself to the throne of grace, when your offences, if yen are truly penitent, may find for- giveness. The sentence which the law of your country passes upon you is, That you, Joshua Slade, be taken from hence to the prison from whence you came, and from thence on Thursday next to the place of execution ; that you there be hanged by the neck till you are dead, and your body afterwards be dissected and anatomized ; and may the Lord in his infinite goodness have mercy on your soul.*' The countenance of Slade appeared somewhat paler on hearing the verdict, and while the Judge was pro- nouncing sentence upon him. He stood for a few se^- conds, as if lost, in the dock ; but, recollecting himself, he descended quickly, and shook hands with Heddings 87 —as striking a proof, perhaps, of his guilt as had that day been adduced. Crial of ^tXdsing^. Slade was then removed to a cell behind the dock / and after the buzz in the Court had subsided, fViUlam Heddings was put to the bar, charged with breaking into the house of Emmanuel Thompson, at IStow, in the county of Huntingdon, and stealing a quantity of bacon, three sovereigns, and two one pound notes. The bur- glary was distinctly proved by the prosecutor and his two servants. John Slade, aged 22, who was admitted as King's evidence in this case, deposed as follows : 1, and my brother Joshua, and Heddings went to Stow, eight weeks since, intending to steal a pig a-piece, Heddings looked round the house, and seeing the dairy window, said, if we could get a few of those slats off we could get something to eat !' The iron bar across we pulled back, and my brother Josh, got in first, and I followed, and took out the bacon, two whole flitches, and two hams 5 we put them into a sack, and took it home 5 this was about twelve o'clock at night. We parted the bacon at Heddings's house.*' Heddings stated that he never was in the house. The Judge summed up, and the Jury instantly re- turned a verdict of Guilty. — Death recorded. Having turned King's evidence, John Slade was of course released from the House of Correction, in which he had been confined. Next day, he enlisted into the Royal Marines y but Captain Stevens, an ofiicer of 88 that corps^ residing at Caaibridge, refused to attest him 5 and a report having been made to Colonel Savage, the Commanding Officer at Chatham, an order was im- mediately returned for the dismissal of Slade. The unfortunate young man — for such he may be truly con- sidered — then succeeded in obtaining employment as a labourer, during the harvest. His former employers give him an excellent character, and we sincerely trust that his future conduct will not belie their expectations. Heddings was removed from Huntingdon Gaol to the Hulks at Woolwich, on Wednesday, August 8th. As the coach was starting from the George Hotel, he took off his hat, and gave three cheers to the assembled populace! — We now return to the principal actor iu this eventful drama. After the trial, Slade was fastened to Heddings by a chain and re-conducted back to Gaol. His return from the court to the prison was marked with the most unbe- coming levity. He pushed Heddings in sport from side to side, and laughed, to see," as he said, such a parcel of fools following them.'* He entered the prison with an air of vulgar triumph ^ but, as he afterwards affirmed, with the full intention of immediately taking away his own life. On being left alone in his cell, he was about to suspend himself by means of his handker- chief, when Mr. Brown, the Chaplain, providentially entered^ and frustrated the rash attempt. It was a source of much consolation to him, dunng the remain- ing partion of his life, that he was prevented from adding self-destruction to the number of his crimes. On Thursday morning a respite for twenty-four hours 89 arrived from Cambridge^ and signed by Lord Chief Baron Alexander. Slade continued up till the after- noon of that day to deny all participation in the murder. He deserved death, he said, for the numerous offences he had committed. He had frequently robbed Mr. Waterhouse, and on one occasion he had threatened his life, as stated by Heddings 5 but of the horiid deed for which he was about to suffer, he was as innocent as the child unborn. The same declaration he made re- peatedly, affirming his innocence to his relatives, and particularly to one of his sisters, who was much affected at parting with him, believing it to be for the last time. His poor old father did not come from Stukeley j but his mother, the most culpable of the two, visited him in prison, and parted from her son without the least emotion. You know,'* said she, that 1 never told you to steal ; I brought you up as vve!l as I could.'* — *^ Yes," said the keeper of the prison, who was standing by, but you know that you partook of the stolen goods, and must have been all along aware of the course of life your children were pursuing.'* Ay,'* added the virago,*^ but God bless you, Josh 5 good bye — what way do I go to get out ?" — and so saying, she took her departure. The Sacrament was then administered to the unhappy youth j and it is appalling to think, that though he believed himself t» be within an hour of his death, he persisted, even with the sacramental elements in his hand, in declaring his total ignorance of the murder. A few hours afterwards, when informed of his respite, a better spirit seemed to possess him 5 he sent for the Chaplain, and entered into a full and unreserved disclo- sure of his guilt. Before the Rev. Gentleman had left I 90 hun, the Under-sheriff arrived from Cambridge and alighted at the gaol door; he was the bearer of another respite from Chief Baron Alexander, deferring the exe- cution till the first of September. The Under-sheriff, upon being informed that the prisoner had made a con- fession, considered it necessary immediately to take the direction of the Judge, under the then circatostance&, and immediately posted to Cambridge 5 but before he coidd arrive there, the Judges had left for Bury, to which place he followed them and called their lordships up the Judges having consulted together were of opi- nion they had power ic grant the respite, and as it had gone forth they would not rescind it. The postponement of the execution disappointed thou- sands of persons, w ho had assembled from all parts of the county to witness the painful exhibition. I'he town was literally filled with visitors 5 and on Friday morn- ing it seemed as if their wishes were about to be gra- tified • for the gallows was erected in the usual place, ^J he was now, however, he said, con- vinced that his crime was on that account the greater 5 and the rev^ gentleman had always treated his parents and himself with the utmost kindness. He frequentl entered, without solicitation, upon the subject of the murder, ^'l had no intention," he said, "of taking away the life of Mr. Waterhouse. I went on purpose to steal a silver candlestick and stencher (extinguisher) which he had locked up in a bureau : they were the only articles of plate I had ever seen in the house, ex- cepting a few tea-spoons.'* 103 How came you then to take the sword with you ? I took it without considering wherefore, except to defend myself. Had you sharpened it? No, it was very dull : when Mr« Waterhouse catched hold of it, I had the greatest difficulty in the world to draw it out of his hands. What idea had you when you deposited it in the straw wall on Mr, Waterhouse's premises } I used to hide the different things 1 stole there ; I could not take them home; and 1 put the sword there among the rest. I was not altogether above a minute m committing the murder. Mr. Waterhouse did not utler a word all the way down stairs. When I struck the first blow, I stood between him and the first kitchen door, by the foot of the stairs. Did he not offer to make any resistance } No J he knew it would be of no use. The last words he said were, after 1 had stabbed him in the throat — Now you have done it he then let his hands fall, which he had put up to guard his head, as I aimed all the blows at his head 5 when I saw his hands fall I ran out, and threw the sword among the oaks 5 I ran on to thetunnTel. What could be your motive in murdering Mr. Water* house } I was afraid he would tell of me, and I should be hung, I thought because I was found in his house I should be sure to be hung. I know now that I was wrong in thinkiug so. Did you not feel very sorry and shocked at what you had done ? 104 No : I hope God will forgive me 5 I was such a fel* low, I thought about nothing, I was always of a cruel disposition. I did not feel any remorse daring the time I lay in the barley field, or the day after the murder. In this way did the miserable and misguided youth aeek to relieve his mind by discoursing on the subject of (he diabolical deed which brought him to the scaffold. He imputed most of his crimes to his connexion with Heddings.. He lived two years servant, he said, with Mr. HoddeM, a farmer near Ellington, and conducted him- self with honesty. After he got acqu^^inted with Hed* dings, at Stukeley, the latter was always coaxing him to join him, *^ 1 can tell you," said he, *' how to get a wooMird (a sheep) when you like.'* They promised never to inform agaii^st each other 5 " and I am sure/' said Slade, *^ I never would ha^ve told on him.*' — Did you not acquaint him with the murder, as stated in his evidence at the trial ? No 5 it was all false j but he knew what I could do when I was put %o it : and he knew that I could give no account of myself on that day. Beddings spoke the truth about the robbery, when I entered Mr. Water* house's bed«room. I got just fifty shillings. You could not, 1 am sure, be any better for the money and goods you got in a dishonest way } O no, sir, I never was : I spent all 1 got, and aiy earnings besides, in the public house.* • Slade was latterly much addicted to drinking, in consequence, no doubt, of his irregular life and dangerous pursuits. We have already mentioned that he and Beddings used frequently to enter Mr. Waterhouse's cellat* on the Sunday mornings. There was one cask of remarkably strong old ale» which the rev. gentleman intended should be drunk after his funeral, by tbe men who carried him to the grave. Slade and Heddings havinp^ htsir^ 105 He frequently expressed his thankfulness that he had been convicted for the murder : he might, if not detect- ed this time, have gone on deepening his own guilt, and perhaps depriving others of their lives. The ensuing winter, he feared, would have been a terrible one with him, for his conscience had been so completely seared that he contemplated the commission of murder without the least fear or remorse. Now, however, he thought otherwise, aind hoped God would forgive him for the past, and enable him to prepare for the change that awaited him. The conduct of the Judge appeared to have made a strong impression on his mind : he had antici- pated only the terrors of the law 5 and was therefore equally gratified and surprised to find that his case was treated with the most considerate impartiality and even kindness. His heart, he said, was often melted during the trial, and if the fatal sword had been produced iu court he could have stood out no longer. He had per- sisted in denying his guilt chiefly on account of his rela-- tives, as he. could not bring his mind to face them with their knowledge that he was guilty. He did not consi- der sufficiently the criminality of persevering in such a line of conduct 5 but he would not, he said, have gone out of the world denying his guilt. In this composed state of mind he continued till the period of his execu- tion. His health remained untouched 5 he ate his meals heartily, and slept soundly. A deep feeling of sorrow and remorse was ever present to his thoughts 5 but even of this choice ale, broached the cask one day, and at a few sittings com., pletely emptied it. They then filled up the barrel with small beer, whicb, tbi / took from a larger cask in the cellar. 106 this contrite gloom, heightened by the conBciousness that he was soon to die an ignominious death, was infi» nitely preferable to the reckless gaiety and sinfulness^! his former life. He never, he said, felt so sincerely and truly happy. If his chains were struck off, he would rather walk to the gallows, than go to Stukeley to live as he had hitherto done. The condition of Slade at this momentous period of his life has often reminded us of the following powerfiri passage in one of Crabbe's Tales :— But he was cured ; for quiet, faith, and care. Strove with the gloom, and broke on the despair 5 Yet slow their progress, and as vapours move Dense and reluctant from the wint'ry grove ; All is confusion till the morning light Gives the dim scene obscurely to the sight ; More and yet more defin'd the trunks appear, Till the wild prospect stands distinct and clear !— So the dark mind of th' assassin grew Clear and sedate, the dreadful mist withdrew; And he resembled that bleak wiht*ry scene, Sad, though unclouded ; dismal, though serene. As the fatal first of September drew nigh, Slade ap- plied himself more and more to prepare for eternity. " 1 never hear the bolt of my door withdrawn,** said he one day, but I liope it is some one coming to read to me, or to talk on religious subjects.** The idea that he would have to answer not only for his own sins (which were heavy enough), but for those of Mr. Waterhouse, whom he had sent out of the world without allowing a moment's time for repentance, weighed heavily upon his mind, and produced sometimes the greatest depres- sion of spirits. On these occasions, his chest would 107 heave — his limbs tremble — and the cold sweat stand npon his forehead. " Did not Mr. Waterhouse call on God to assist or to forgive him, id his last moments said a rev. gentleman. No/' replied Slade, with a strong expression of countenance, I wish he had— but I scarcely gave him time." The beautiful Parables of our Saviour interested him deeply, and he instantly comprehended their meaning, and knew how to apply them. By reading and conversing with him daily, the worthy Chaplain effected a wonderful change in his heart and feelings : he entered upon his religious duties with the same ardour that he formerly embarked in his vicious pursuits, and exhibited an affecting example of the power of religion in transforming and exalting the human mind. On Thursday, his father, a. wretched-looking old man, bent almost double by. age and infirmity, came from Stukeley to take leave of the prisoner. His mother was unable to attend from illness. Two of his ^^isters also arrived, and the parting scene was more affecting than could have been anticipated, from the indifference previously manifested by the parties. One of his sisters asked him particularly if he had said any thing to Hed- dings concerning the murder. He answered in the most solemn manner that he had not : the whole was false. Do you know,'* said she, I have seen your likeness at the shop windows, and it is very like you." — Is it,'* said he with astonishment, 'Miow could it be taken?'* The turnkey told him it was taken in court during his trial 5 Slade seemed much surprised at the circumstance. After some further conversation, his sister asked him if 108 he was afraid at the thought of dying 3 he said no 5 he was quite easy and resigned. The former then expressed how glad she was to hear him say so, and hoped God would forgive him, upon which they shook hands with each other, kissed, and parted. On the day before his execution the chaplain scarcely ever left his cell , and nothing, we are informed by the rev. gentleman, could exceed the tranquillity and re- signation of his mind* He frequently remarked how just was that text of Scripture, fVhoso sheddeth man s blood, hy man shall his blood be shed'* The Rev. Mr. Lee repeated to him the concluding verse of the sixth chapter of Romans : For the wages of sin is death ; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.*^ He derived great comfort from the text, and repeated it, as will be seen hereafter, on the scaffold. His memory was unusually retentive, and easily retained any portion of Scripture, which it was sought to impress upon his mind. The Chaplain left him about ten o'clock on Friday evening, and upon be- ing locked up, he said to the turnkey, " this is the last time you will have to lock me up 5 to-morrow night, I trust, I shall be happier than I am now.'* He slept soundly, and awoke about six o'clock. At seven, Mr. Cole, keeper of the prison, found him engaged in assist- ing an old man, a debtor, to light the fire. He appeared cool and collected, and even unconcerned. During the whole of the morning he was engaged with the Chaplain in his religious duties. At ten o'clock the Sacrament was administered to him in the chapel^ in presence of the other prisoners, of whom he took leave. 109 shaking hands with them ail^ and telling them to tak« warning by his fate. " About eleven, the Under-sheriflf arrived on horse* back, attended in the discharge of his painful duty by several constables. The prisoner's irons being knocked off, and his arms and wrists pinioned, he was conducted to the cart which awaited at the door to convey him to the place of execution. At the same time the bell of St. Mary's Church began to toll. Slade*s wonted firmness seemed to forsake him in these trying moments, and he shook violently. On being placed in the cart by the side of the executioner, a more moving picture of hu- man wretchedness was never perhaps exhibited. Hi« countenance was pale as death, and he seemed unablo to sit upright. He was dressed in the clothes in which he committed the murder — a dirty fustian jacket and trousers. His hat was pulled over his brows, his eye* shut, ^nd he seemed internally engaged in prayer du- ring the progress of the melancholy cavalcade. The gallows was erected in the outskirts of the town, near the race-course, in a place singularly well adapted for the purpose, where the common-land of the Bur- gesses suddenly descends, and forms a sort of natural theatre in front of the river, about 100 yards in length, and 50 in breadth. The scene was highly striking and picturesque, and the day fine 3 the sun shone without a cloud. The sides of the hills, and the plain below on which the gallows stood, were crowded with spectators. There could not be less than four thousand persons present. Indeed, during the whole of the day, the town resembled a fair, or the period of a contested election, Oo arriving at the fatal spot, the prisoner was assisted 110 to mount the platform, where the Chaplain arrayed in his surplice stood ready to receive him. He joined in the prayers with the utmost fervour and devotion 5 but was at times dreadfully agitated. Having concluded the impressive service, the reverend gentleman shook hands with the culprit, and asked him if he had any- thing on his mind which he wished to divulge. He said 110 5 he was quite prepared to suffer. The executioner then proceeded to do his duty, and having put the fatal noose round the neck of the prisoner, adjusted the rope, and pulled the cap over his face^ he quitted the platform. Slade then stood alone on the drop, and seeming to collect all his energy, he said with a firm unfaultering voice — My friends ^ I bid you farewell. I hope you will all take warning by my fate, Remem^ ber, the wages of sin is death-, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ my Saviour. And now, my dear friends, I once more bid you farewell: farewell /'* The drop instantly fell, and in a few mo- ments the unhappy youth had ceased to exist. He ex- pired without a struggle. The spectators seemed deeply affected by his calm demeanour and untimely fate. When he stood up on the scaffold and spoke the few touching words quoted above, the affecting nature of the address, and the boyish tone of his voice moved^ many persons even to tears. After hanging the usual tim.e the body was cut down by the executioner, placed in a coffin, and re-conveyed to the prison, where it lay till about one o'clock on Sun- day morning, when it was taken to the premises of Mr. Wilson, surgeon, for dissection. Slade was five feet six inches and a half in height, of a Ill slight make, but sinewy and muscular. The appear- ance and expression of his countenance were scarcely altered in the slightest degree by death. On stripping the body, its muscular strength and fine proportions excited the admiration of the medical gentlemen present. He had died in full health, and appeared much stouter thaa when alive 5 and it is a curious fact that the culprit had even grown comparatively fat during the period of his imprisonment. He never ate so heartily, he said, as he did in gaol 3 and through the kindness of the Under- sheriff he wanted for nothing that might contribute to his nourishment and support. On examining the body, the peculiar conformation of the great toe on each foot produced considerable surprise : it extended in length about an inch beyond the others. As the dissecting room was, during the greater part of the day, open to the public, numbers of individuals attended to witness the appearance of the body, which presented a motst humiliating and revolting spectacle. His countenance seemed a fitting index to the mind of a murderer — cruel, deliberate, and ferocious. A plaster mould has been cast from the features. On Tuesday morning the brain was dissected in the presence of most of our medical autho- rities. From deferring the dissection as long as possible, to accommodate a greater number of young surgeons, the brain had undergone a considerable change 5 and it was therefore almost impossible to elucidate the different parts with that degree of anatomical accuracy which might have been attained at an earlier period. The investing mem- brane, called the Dura Mater, was, however, extremely 112 tense and firm, and in several places inflammation l)etween it and the Pia Mater, or immediate envelope of the brain, was discovered^ and must have existed for fiome time. Firm adhesions had in consequence taken place 5 but these appearances are, we believe, by no means uncommon 3 for few people v/ho have suffered from fever, or severe blows on the head, are without them. Siade previously to his execution confessed that at different times he had received blows upon the head, and described the external situation of two of them, which corresponded exactly with the internal adhesions : between the under part of the cerebellum, and the con- tiguous Dura Mater, several strong adhesions w^ere also discovered. The internal viscera of the chest and of the body were in an extremely healthy state, not having apparently ever suffered from illness. Mr. Wilson, to whom the dissection of the body was committed, acted wisely, we think, in making it public as far as wnth propriety could be permitted 5 for, judg- ing from our own sensations, if men can be deterred from the commission of acts of bloodshed by a dread of the consequences, the exhibition of one dissection must go farther than a hundred executions. The conduct of Slade's relatives, during the whole of this trying affair, has been exposed to considerable cen- sure. In persons of their condition it would be absurd to expect that acuteness of feeling and nice sensibility which shed an indescribable charm over the intercourse of intelligent and refined society ) but the Slades appear to be wanting even in common humanity. His sisters 113 were not ashamed to attend the races, whilst their bro- ther was immured in a solitary cell^ under sentence of death — his mother talks of Joshua's guilt and of his vicious habits without the least display of common feeling— and his father was seen trudging home on the night before the execution with a load of wood which he had been plundering from the neighbouring hedges,* On Monday the old man came to Huntingdon, to enquire of Mr. Cole, keeper of the prison, whether Joshua had left any thing for him — any old clothes, or doctor's bottles, that he might sell. Being answered in the negative t *^ Do you know," added he, what has been done with the body No,'* replied Mr. Cole, I do not."-^^^ I have been told," rejoined old Slade, — " that they only want the heart and two or three other * If our information be correct, the elder Slade might have sat for the following picture : — '* Wo to the gard'ner's pale, the farmer's hedge. Plash' d neatly, and secured with driven stakes Deep in the loamy bank. Uptorn by strength, Resistless in so bad a cause, but lame To better deeds, he bundles up the spoil, An ass's burthen, and, when laden most And heaviest, light of foot steals fast away." The Task, Book IV. The inhabitants of Great Stukeley have a lively recollection of their for. mer neighbours, the JSlades, who were alike feared and despised in the parish. John and Joshua latterly carried on, in coojunction with Heddings and others, an extensive traffic in poaching, by which they realised occasionally considerable sums of money. The Rev. Mr. Bailey has obligingly furnished us with the following certificate of Joshua's baptism, extracted from the Register : — BAPTISMS. 1809 ****** Joshua, son of William and Elizabeth Slade, baptized March 26th. John Bailey, Vicar. He was born, as we have already stated (upon the authority of his mother), on the I4th of January ; and was consequently at the time of his death ex- actly 18 years, 7 months, a fortnight, and 3 days old. L 114 things out of hira — a speech to which no answer was leturned. In this callous, unnatural deportment, may be traced the germ of Joshua's guilt. — Yet who can tell l ow much of the apparent insensibility of the Slades may not be imputed to ignorance and want, and to the absence of spiritual instruction, peculiar to the viUnge ? Nothing tends so effectually to shut up the heart and deaden the feelings as long-continued poverty. Atrocious as was the crime for which Slade justly forfeited his life, the spectacle of a human being cut off in the very spring-time of his days could not be wit- nessed without emotion, and was beheld evidently with deep commisseration. His extreme youth and peni- Rnce pleaded powerfully in his favour, and the con-^ sciousness that he had been neglected by his parents, and afterwards made the dupe of an accomplished vil- lai i, tended to blunt the feeling of abhorrence with which his guilt was universally regarded, and to excite sentiments rather of pity and compassion. Depraved as his life had been, there was doubtless a time when he little dreamt that it would be closed upon the scaffold — when, if he bad been told, while earning his bread ho- nestly by the sweat of his brow, that he would turn out a robber and a murderer, he would have rejected the im- putation with scorn, and have been ready to say with I liizael of old : Is thy servant a dog that he should do this great thing?'* Had 1 but known the least part