— 
 
 ^3BB5E 
 
 OTB 
 
 i^— 
 
 BBBEZKBEB 
 
 >— 
 
s^Qc 
 
 _** 
 
 &3&t 
 

 
 %&*w& 
 
id §p 
 
— £« 
 
A VISIT TO 
 
 THE DOMED CHURCHES 
 
 OF 
 
 CHARENTE, 
 
 FRANCE, 
 
 BY THE ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATION OF LONDON. 
 
 IN THE YEAE 18 75. 
 
 PUBLISHED AS A MEMORIAL 
 
 TO 
 
 EDMUND SHABPE 
 
 •U'lTII AX 
 
 HISTORICAL AXD DESCRIPTIVE TEXT. 
 
 ILLUSTRATED BY 
 
 SIXTY PHOTO-LITHOGRAPHED PLATES. 
 
Digitized by the Internet Archive 
 
 in 2012 with funding from 
 
 Research Library, The Getty Research Institute 
 
 http://www.archive.org/details/visittodomedchurOOarch 
 
TO THE MEMORY 
 OF 
 
 EDMUND SHARPE 
 
 THIS VOLUME IS DEDICATED BY THE 
 ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATION. 
 
MEMOIR. 
 
 MEMOIR. 
 
 EDMUND SHARPE, the only son of Francis Sharpe of Heathfield, 
 Knutsford, Cheshii'e, was born at Knutsford on the 31st October, 
 
 Education. ' ' ' 
 
 1809. After a school course at Dr. Burney's, Greenwich, and 
 also at Sedbergh, he entered at St. John's College, Cambridge ; and, being elected 
 in 1832 Travelling Bachelor of Arts for the University, spent three years in the 
 study of Architecture, making a considerable collection of drawings from churches 
 in France and Germany. His enthusiasm was thoroughly roused as he pursued 
 his task, and his studies were of the most assiduous kind. By the advice of 
 Dr. Whewell, Master of Trinity, who took a deep interest in him, he gave very 
 special attention to Romanesque work. In 1835 he took the degree of M.A. 
 
 Mr. Sharpe, after receiving instruction from Mr. Rickman, settled 
 
 an Architect 
 
 at Lancaster in 1836, and practised Architecture as a profession 
 
 actively for about fifteen years; from 1845 in partnership with 
 Mr. E. G. Paley. He retired definitely in 1851 ; after having designed about 
 forty churches, chiefly in the north of England, among which the terra-cotta 
 churches of Lever Bridge and Piatt, and the churches of Witton, near Blackburn, 
 and Bamber Bridge in the Romanesque style, which was always favoured by him, 
 may be mentioned. He also designed and carried out, in conjunction with 
 Mr. Paley, Wigan Parish Church, Hornby Castle, Capernwray Hall, and various 
 other mansions and buildings. 
 
 - 
 
 In public as in private life his wonderful energy and versatility made them- 
 selves felt. Keen perception and judgment often enabled him to foresee advantages 
 and results, and although enthusiasm at times led him into difficulties 
 
 Public 
 
 Services. which he had underrated, — his determination, energy, and remai*kable 
 
 power of organization, enabled him to carry through successfully what 
 
 many other men would have shrunk from undertaking. He was elected a member 
 
 of the Town Council in 1841, and Mayor of Lancaster in 1848. In April, 1859, 
 
ii. MEMOIR. 
 
 he was appointed J. P. for Lancashire, and in October, 1859, for Denbighshire. 
 Throughout his close connection with Lancaster he was a very active promoter of 
 sanitary and social improvements. The carrying out of the project of 1851, for sup- 
 plying the town with water from the springs of the millstone grit of Wyresdale — by 
 which Lancaster enjoys one of the best and purest water supplies in the kingdom — and 
 other sanitary reforms, will always be associated with his name. His social qualities,* 
 and his genuine and earnest love of music, will also not be forgotten at Lancaster. 
 This love of music seems to have been hereditary; his great-grandfather was a 
 musician of some note, and is still spoken of in Stamford, where he died in 1783. 
 
 Business 
 
 After taking his pupil, Mr. E. G. Paley, into partnership, he gave time 
 and attention to works of an engineering character, chiefly railways. 
 He organized the railway from Skipton to Lancaster and from Lancaster 
 to Morecambe, which was opened about 1848, and was in turn contractor for a portion 
 of the works of this railway, secretary to the company, and finally for several years 
 contractor for the working of the line. His original scheme was to carry this line 
 beyond Morecambe to Heysham, and to form there a deep harbour. If the opposition 
 had not proved too great to enable him to carry out the scheme, Heysham — with its 
 open channel of 18 feet depth of water at low tide — would have become a valuable port 
 on the west coast. He was also connected with the Liverpool and Crosby Railway, and 
 was engaged for many years in organizing and constructing the line from Conway to 
 Llanrwst, in North Wales, which was opened in 1863, and then sold to the London 
 and North Western Railway Company. He left Lancaster about the year 1857, to 
 reside at Coed-y-celyn, a property beautifully situated near Bettws-y-coed, which he 
 had purchased. Here he spent what were probably the happiest years of his life. 
 From 1863 to 1866 he resided altogether abroad, and was enframed in constructing the 
 Geneva tramways, which were almost the first street tramways on the Continent. He 
 was also largely interested in the railway from Perpignan to Prades, an enterprise 
 which involved him in great responsibility and anxiety for several years. He became 
 much attached to the beautiful country in that part of France, and acquired iron- 
 
 * " Those who were only acquainted with Mr. Sharpe in his public life could scarcely know how tender and sensitive 
 a nature he possessed. He took the greatest interest in the welfare of others ; his generous, hearty sympathy won for 
 him the confidence and esteem of all who knew him. He had always a ready and helping hand for those who needed 
 it. His unobtrusive character prevented any assumption of superiority ; in the company of younger men he was 
 always genial ; — his superior knowledge was put at their service without dogmatism or patronage, and he always 
 showed himself ready and even anxious to hear what could be said against his opinions." — From the Memoir read 
 before the Architectural Association, in 1877. 
 
MEMOIK. ni. 
 
 mines and landed property there. The Phoenix Foundry at Lancaster, employing 
 about 150 workmen, was bought by him about the year 1850, in order to set up two 
 of his employes in business. The foundry afterwards returned on his hands, and was 
 owned and worked by him up to his death. In 1867 he returned to Lancaster, where, 
 although making occasional visits to France, he generally resided for the rest of his 
 life. 
 
 The publication of "Architectural Parallels" — the most important of 
 his works, when completed in 1817 — gave him, in the opinion of 
 
 Publications. r o i 
 
 competent students throughout the world, a very high place among 
 delineators of mediaeval buildings. It was followed by three other works in quick 
 succession. From 1852 to 1870 no separate publication of importance was made, — 
 although the old habits of sketching and study in actual buildings were never laid 
 aside. Brief intervals of leisure in his busiest years were devoted to his favourite 
 pursuit. His aim throughout was to ascertain the rules which guided the designers of 
 the best architecture, not simply to study picturesque and beautiful work; — "the 
 theory of architecture" always captivated his imagination. The camera-lucida, for 
 outlining general sketches, and the cymograph for taking mouldings, were carried with 
 him on all his journeys, and he took every opportunity of visiting buildings of interest 
 which came across or near to his path. In 1870 he resolved to make some of the 
 accumulated material available for others ; and between that date and his death he 
 published several works. Three were in progress, and others in contemplation, when 
 he caught the cold which brought on inflammation of the lungs during a visit to 
 Northern Italy, accompanied by two of his daughters, his youngest son, and three 
 assistants, — a visit made specially to collect materials for dealing with developments in 
 his favourite Transitional period, in continuing the series of Papers on Church 
 Architecture. For the last two months of his life he had been engaged in carefully 
 measuring the principal buildings of Pavia, Lucca, and Pistoja. It is greatly to be 
 regretted that his death occurred at a time when only a portion of the drawings and 
 
 information, got together with so much labour and delight, had been brought into 
 shape. 
 
 He died at Milan, on the 8th of May, 1877. His body was brought 
 
 | .. home to Lancaster, to be buried beside that of his wife, whose death had 
 
 Death, 
 
 inflicted upon him a severe blow the year before. He married, in 1843, 
 Miss Elizabeth Fletcher, daughter of Colonel Fletcher of (he Hollins, Bolton-le-Moors. 
 Five children survived him, three sons and two daughters. 
 
iy. MEMOIR. 
 
 He became a member of The Ro} r al Institute of British Architects in 
 
 Connection with 
 
 Professional 1818, served on the Council as a Country Member during 1871-2 and 
 Societies. 1872-73, and contributed to the Transactions in 1851, 1865, and 1871. 
 The Royal Gold Medal was conferred upon him in 1875, — the greatest distinction of 
 an honorary kind which can be obtained by any member of the architectural pro- 
 fession, — a distinction which gave him more pleasure, as he frankly stated, than any 
 previously bestowed upon him. 
 
 At the age of sixty he had resolved to enjoy more leisure from 
 
 Connection with 
 
 The Architectural business, and to devote considerable time to the furtherance of the study 
 Association. £ (.j^^h architecture. He had attended for many years the meetings of 
 the Archaeological Institute, and contributed valuable papers ; but his energetic spirit 
 grew impatient of the delays which were inevitably incident to the meetings of that 
 most agreeable and learned society, accompanied as the members always were by many 
 ineffectives. He conceived the idea of sharing the beneficial experiences of an archi- 
 tectural excursion with a body which should supply a thoroughly working contingent. 
 He therefore became a member of the Architectural Association in November, 1869, 
 and a proposal made by him to the Committee of the Association, led to the first of 
 the excursions under his guidance (to Lincoln, Sleaford, and Spalding), in August, 
 1870.* This excursion proved so useful and pleasant to the students who took part in 
 it, that a series followed: — in 1871 Ely, Lynn, and Boston; — in 1872 Stamford, 
 Oundle, Wellingborough, and Northampton; in 1873 Grantham, Newark, Southwell, 
 Ashbourne, and Lichfield; — in 1874, an extensive area, ranging from Paris and its 
 neighbourhood, to Soissons, Laon, Rheims on one side, and to Chartres on the other, 
 and comprising many important cathedrals and churches. 
 
 The results of the first French excursion were described in a Lecture, illustrated 
 by a marvellous collection of drawings, delivered at Willis's rooms, in 1875; and in 
 
 * The following particulars with reference to this excursion would apply to all the others : — " I well remember the 
 energy and zeal with which Mr. Sharpe threw himself into the work, not being satisfied until he had infused the same 
 spirit of enthusiasm into every one associated with him. The programme was most carefully prepared. The hotels 
 were selected, and every arrangement made for the accommodation of the party at each halting place. Carriages were 
 hired for the roads, and special fares and special carriages obtained from the railway companies. The cathedral, and 
 every church in the neighbourhood, was thrown open for our inspection. The ground had been carefully gone over 
 beforehand, — by the time the party met at Lincoln Mr. Sharpe had arranged every detail, and all went smoothly and 
 merrily. The amount of time, labour, and expense incurred in making these arrangements could only be known by 
 those who were associated with Mr. Sharpe in carrying them out. lu order to secure thorough accuracy in the des- 
 criptions of the buildings visited in this excursion, he spent some time in going over the ground again, to correel and 
 complete the work which he afterwards published." — (From one of the Honorary Secretaries of the 1870 Excursion). 
 
MEMOIR. 
 
 August and September of that year, the excursion which went the farthest afield and 
 lasted the longest, was made to the Department of Charente, with Angouleme, Chalais, 
 and Cognac as head-quarters. The architecture of Charente was described by Mr. 
 Sharpe in a lecture on the 13th June, 1876, and illustrated by a still larger number of 
 drawings ; many of which were specially prepared for the lecture, from the measure- 
 ments and sketches made by the members. The Architecture of this part of France 
 had long been highly valued by Mr. Sharpe, on account of its bearing, both in respect 
 of resemblance and of contrast, upon the work of the 12th century in which he so 
 delighted, in other districts of Europe ; and this excursion seemed to him the 
 crowning work of his leadership. 
 
 The members of the Association have desired and have hitherto been able to 
 carry out Mr. Sharpe's wish, that the excursions should be continued year by year; thus 
 in 1876 from Winchester, in 1877 from Warwick, in 1878 from Hull, in 1879 from 
 Wells, and in 1880 from Norwich, the members visited the districts round those centres. 
 Those who had known him well, and had enjoyed the invaluable advantage of his leader- 
 ship, resolved also to make some lasting record of their affectionate remembrance, by 
 giving care and pains to one of his incompleted tasks, by publishing some of the 
 drawings made in pleasant days in Charente. The names of the few who were able to 
 bear a hand in this work have, in accordance with their own special wish, been left 
 unrecorded. They have merely acted for the Architectural Association, and on behalf 
 of the whole profession of Architects, and many others, who desired to show that they 
 had felt the influence and regretted the loss of Edmund Sharpe. 
 
LIST OF MR, SHARPE'S PUBLICATIONS. 
 
 THE full title has been copied in each case. The information in small type has been 
 obtained from many sources, — in order to indicate, as far as possible, the method 
 of publication, and the intention of the author with respect to the final form of 
 each work. 
 
 I.— ARCHITECTURAL PARALLELS ; or the Progress of Ecclesiastical Architecture in 
 England, through the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries, exhibited in a series of parallel 
 examples selected from the following Abbey churches : — Fountains, Kirkstall, Furness, 
 Roche, Byland, Hexham, Jervaulx, Whitby, Rievaulx, Netley, Bridlington, Tintern, 
 St. Mary's York, Guisborough, Selby, Howden. By Edmund Sharpe, MA., Architect. 
 Formerly Travelling Bachelor of Arts for the University of Cambridge, and Scholar of 
 St. John's College. London : Van Voorst. 
 
 a. Large paper proofs. Folio (24j-in. by 18f-in.). Complete, £15. 
 
 b. Small paper tinted. Folio (21fin. by 14fin.). £12 12s. 
 Small paper plain. Ditto. £10 10s. 
 
 The work was issued in twelve parts, each of ten Plates loose in a wrapper. The first 
 part of the work was sent out to subscribers (from Mr. Sharpe's office at Lancaster), 
 early in 1845, and the last part in the autumn of 1847. The completed work has a Dedi- 
 cation to the Earl of Derby, dated from Lancaster, January, 1848. There is no Text, — 
 but two lists of the Plates are given in order to convey suggestions for binding the work. 
 In list A the plans are grouped together, then the elevations, the sections, the views, &e. 
 In list B the Illustrations of Fountains are put together, then those of Kirkstall, &c. It was 
 at first proposed to issue some letterpress separately, containing a complete review of the 
 Architecture of England and Wales between A.D. 1130 and A.D. 1300. 
 
 The Illustrations comprise one group of plans on wood, and 120 lithographs : — plans, 
 eight sheets ; longl. elevns., 10 ; longl. seens., 9 ; E. elevns., 7 ; W. N. and S. elevns., 5 ; 
 transverse seens., 9 ; side aisle compartments, 8 ; details, 16 ; perspective views, 40 ; sculp- 
 ture, 9=121 sheets in all. 
 
 After E. G. Paley and T. Austin had measured the buildings, and R. J. Withers 
 some details, under Mr. Sharpe's direction, the principal geometrical drawings were made to 
 scale on the spot, and completed and put on the stone by them at Lancaster. The stones 
 were sent to Messrs. Maclnre, Maedonald, and Magregor, of Liverpool, who proved and 
 lettered them, and printed the whole of the work. Mr. Sharpe made the whole of the 
 sketches for the perspective views, which were drawn on stone by Haworth Fielding. 
 
 II.— DECORATED WINDOWS ; a Series of Illustrations of the Window Tracery of the 
 Decorated Style of Ecclesiastical Architecture. Edited, with Descriptions, by 
 Edmund Sharpe, M.A., Architect. London: Van Voorst. 1849. 
 
 Demy 8vo, (8^-m. by 5J-in.) Without pagination, — one page of Text to each Plate. Sixty 
 Steel Engravings, dated 1S45, £1 Is. This work was issued in parts, each containing eight 
 steel Plates, in single leaves, with explanatory letterpress. The first part was brought out 
 in January, 1845, and the other parts after irregular intervals. A large number of the 
 original drawings were by E. G. Paley, others by R. J. Withers and T. Austin : — the 
 drawings for the engraver being made by them in Mr. Sharpe's office at Lancaster. The 
 
vin. MR. SHARPE'S PUBLICATIONS. 
 
 chronological order was given by a List of Plates issued with the last part. It was at first 
 intended that the concluding part should be "A review of the whole subject, illustrated 
 by woodcuts." This review was expanded so as to form the volume which stands next 
 in this list. 
 
 III.— A Treatise on the Rise and Progress of DECORATED WINDOW TRACERY 
 IN ENGLAND. Illustrated with Ninetv-seven AVoodcuts and Six Engravings on 
 Steel. By Edmund Sharps, M.A., Architect. Loudon: Van Voorst. 1849. 
 
 Demy 8vo, (8£-in. by 5|-in.). Dedicated to the Rev. R. Willis. P.8.A. 10s. 6d. Most ot 
 the drawings on wood were prepared by T. Austin, and those for the engraver bv R. J. 
 Withers. 
 
 II. and III. are frequently treated as one work, — ■■ Decorated Windows.'' II. being 
 " Plates " and EU. " Text." 
 
 IV.— SUPPLEMENT TO "ARCHITECTURAL PARALLELS." Containing the fnll-^ized 
 
 mouldings of the following Abbey churches : — Furness, Roche. Byland, Hexham, Jervaulx, 
 Whitby, Fountains, Netlev, Rievaulx, Bridlington, Tintern, St. Mary's York, Guis- 
 borough, Howden, Selby. By Edmund Sharpe, M.A.. Architect. Formerly Travelling 
 Bachelor of Arts for the University of Cambridge, and Scholar of St. John's College. 
 London: Van Voorst. 1848. 
 
 Folio (21f-in. by 14|-in.). £2. Xo letterpress beyond a List of Plates. Sixty Plates. The 
 mouldings taken by Mr. Sharpe and T. Austin with the cymograph, invented at that period 
 by Professor Willis, were drawn on transfer paper by It. J. Withers (o7) and T. Austin (8), 
 and the Plates printed by McKie and Lawson, of Lancaster. 
 
 A'.— THE SEA T EN PERIODS OF ENGLISH ARCHITECTURE defined and illustrated. 
 By Edmund Sharpe, M.A., Architect. Dedicated by permission to the Marquis of 
 Northampton. 
 
 a. First edition. Sup. Royal 8vo (9J-in. by 6-iu.). London : G. Bell. Preface dated Lan- 
 caster, 1851. Text. pp. I. to XIII. — 1 to 37. Twelve Plates drawn by T. Austin, and 
 engraved on steel by G. B. Smith, also seven woodcuts. 10s. 
 
 b. Second edition. London: Spon. 1871. (9f-in. by 6-in.) Text, pp. I. to XIII.— 1 to 37. 
 Twenty steel engravings and seven woodcuts. 15s. The eight additional steel engravings 
 in the 2nd edition are two of the Choir of Peterborough Cathedral ; two of the Xave, two of 
 the Choir, and two of the Presbytery of Lincoln Cathedral. The Plates are not numbered 
 in either edition. 
 
 AT.- THE ARCHITECTURAL, HISTORY OF ST. MARY'S CHURCH, NEAV 
 SHOREHAM. By Edmund Sharpe, M.A., F.R.l.B.A. Read before the Archaeo- 
 logical Institute of Great Britain and Ireland at their Annual Meeting at Chichester, 
 July Kith, 1853. Chichester: Mason. 1861. 
 
 Imperial 4to (12J-in. by 9;|in.). Text, forty-seven pages, two steel engravings (G. B. 
 
 Smith, scidp.) ; six lithographs by H. Fielding, one by R. J. Withers ; fifteen woodcuts. 
 
 Supplemental Sketch of the Collective Architectural History of Chichester Cathedral, Boxgrove 
 Priory, and St. Mary's Church, New Shoreham, as indicated by their mouldings. By 
 Edmund Sharpe, M.A., F.R.l.B.A. 
 
 Text, thirty-two pages. Sixty-two wuodcuts. 
 
 These works by Mr. Sharpe form part of a volume which also contains "The Architectural 
 
 History of Chichester Cathedral, &c," by the Rev. R. Willis, M.A., F.R.S., and "Boxgrove 
 
 Priory," by the Rev. J. L. Petit, M.A., F.S.A. Issued at £l 10s. 
 
 " The Church Architecture of the County of Sussex, by Edmund Sharpe, Esq., M.A.," 
 
 should have formed part of this volume, but Mr. Sharpe had not leisure enough at disposal 
 
to complete the task. In 1853 he "visited all the churches in Sussex of ancient date which 
 are worthy of notice except two," — (Letter of September 4th, 1853.) The notes have been 
 preserved. 
 
 VII.— An Account of the Churches visited during THE LINCOLN EXCURSION 
 OF THE ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATION, August 22nd to 27th, 1870. By 
 Edmund Sharpe, M.A., F.R.I.B. A. London: Spon. 1871. 
 
 Sup. Royal 8vo (9§-in. by 6-in.). Preface dated June 1st, 1871. Text, 152 pages. Sixty- 
 five lithographs, mainly transferred to stone by W. Ilenman, and printed by Kell Bros. ; 
 also four woodcuts. £l Is. Including the Architectural History of Lincoln Cathedral, and 
 the following Parish Churches : St. Benedict, St. Mary-le-Wigford, and St. Peter Gowts, 
 Lincoln ; Caythorpe, Fulbeck, Leadenham, Welbourn, Wellingore, Navenby, Coleby, 
 Ilarmston, Waddington, Canwick, Sleaford, Silk Willoughby, Swarby, Aswarby, Threcking- 
 ham, Billingborough, Horbling, Osbournby, Swayton, Helpringham, Heckington, Asgarby, 
 Kirkby-Laythorpe, Sutton, Gedney, Fleet, llolbeach, Whaplode, Moulton, Weston, and 
 Spalding. 
 
 VIII.— THE MOULDINGS OF THE SIX PERIODS OF BRITISH ARCHITECTURE 
 from the Conquest to the Reformation. By Edmund Sharpe, M.A., F.R.I.B.A. 
 London: Spon. 
 
 Imperial 4to (12J-in. by 9J-in.). Examples taken full size from the principal Cathedral, 
 Conventual, and Parish Churches of the Kingdom, given on scales chiefly varying from 
 one-half to one-third the size of the originals, and printed in colours. 
 
 a. No. I. Preface (two pages) dated Lancaster, May 1st, 1871. Sixty Plates, lithographed by 
 Kell Bros., wholly devoted to Pier Arches. £1 Is. 
 
 b. No. II. 1871. No text, — but a chronological arrangement of all the pier arches and door- 
 way arches contained in numbers I. and II. Sixty plates — (nineteen of pier arches, forty- 
 one of doorway arches). £1 Is. 
 
 c. No. III. 1874. No text; — but a chronological arrangement for the whole of Nos. I. II. and 
 III. Sixty plates — (twenty-five of pier arches, thirty-five of doorway arches). £1 Is. 
 The author's intention was to divide the entire work into three parts, — dealing respectively 
 with arched, horizontal, and vertical mouldings, a, b, and c belong to Part I., dealing with 
 arched mouldings. These three numbers should be broken up, and the Plates numbered and 
 arranged according to the " chronological arrangement" issued with c. 
 
 IX.- THE ORNAMENTATION OF THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD OF BRITISH 
 ARCHITECTURE, A.D. 1145—1190. By Edmund Sharpe, M.A., F.R.I.B.A. 
 
 London: Spon. 
 
 Imperial 4to (12J-in. by 9f-in.) 
 
 a. No. I. Introduction (ten pages) dated February 1st, 1871. Description (to page 82) of 
 Plates completed as far as Plate XIV. Forty-two Plates (thirty-seven of pier capitals, 
 three of doorways, and two of arcades), lithographed by Kell Bros., also three woodcuts. 
 £1 Is. 
 
 b. No. II. Part I. No text. Twenty Plates (fifteen Plates of pier capitals, three of doorways, 
 one of arcades, one of corbel shafts), photo-lithographed by Whiteman and Bass. 10s. 6d. 
 
 c. No. II. Part II. No text. Twenty-two Plates (sixteen Plates of pier capitals, three of 
 doorways, three of arcades), photo-lithographed by Whiteman and Bass. 10s. 6d. 
 
 d. No. III. The lithography of the remainder of the work was nearly finished when Mr. Sharpe 
 died. The letterpress can never be completed, but it may be possible to publish a sufficient 
 number of drawings to make the work fairly complete, and to issue " directions for the re- 
 arrangement and the numbering of the plates, and the binding of the whole in one volume," 
 as proposed by Mr. Sharpe at the first. 
 
MR. SHARPE'S PUBLICATIONS. 
 
 X.— THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE CISTERCIANS. By Edmund Sharps. M.A., 
 F.R.I.B.A. London : Spon. 
 
 Imperial 4to (12|-in. by 9^-in.). 
 
 a. Divided into : — 
 
 Part I. General Plan. Preface dated June 20th, 1S74. Text, — twenty-eight p 
 (Lancaster printed). Plate I., photo-lithographed by C. F. Kell. 
 
 Part II. The Domus Conversorum : containing the Day-room and Dormitory of the 
 Conversi of a Cistercian Monastery. Preface dated June 30th, 1874. Test, — twenty- 
 three pages. Five Plates, photo-lithographed by C. F. Kell. 
 
 [<?. was also issued as, — Illustrated Papers on Church Architecture. By Edmund Sharpe. M.A., 
 F.R.I.B.A. No. 1. April, 1875.] Price of a, 7s. 6d. 
 
 b. Illustrated Papers on Church Architecture. By Edmund Sharpe. M.A., F.R.I.B.A. Xo. 2. 
 April, 1S76. Cistercian Architecture. 
 
 Part I. General Plan (continued). Text (Lancaster printed), — pages 29 to 87 ; appendix 
 i. to xx. Seven Plates, photo-lithographed by C. F. Kell. 7s. Cd. 
 
 c. Part III. Development of Choir, announced but never completed. Plates IV.. V., VI., 
 VII.. and VIII. of b. were prepared as for the " Development of Choir." When the parts 
 are broken up and re-arranged for binding, the Plates in Part II. should be re-numbered 
 from IX. to XIII. 
 
 XL— THE ORNAMENTATION OF THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD IN CENTRAL 
 GERMANY. By Edmund Sharpe. M.A.. F.R.I.B.A. London: Spon, (Lancaster 
 printed). 1877. 
 
 Note: — The title on the cover is. — "Illustrated Papers on Church Architecture. Xo. 8." 
 November, 1876. 
 
 Imperial 4to (12J-in. by 9|-in.). Introduction, two pages: descriptive letterpress, eight 
 -. Twenty-one Plates, engraved by G. B. Smith "from drawings made upwards of 
 forty years ago." 10s. 
 
 The Work last described (XL) was the last actually published before Mr. Sharpe' s death on 
 May 8th, 1877. The next "Illustrated Paper on Church Architecture." (No. IV ) was however 
 ready to receive his last touches, most of the lithographs being actually printed off. "I have 
 already published, in a separate work. Illustrations of the Ornamentation of the Transitional Period 
 of British Architecture. In the next and following numbers of this Series will appear illustra- 
 tions of the same period of Mediaeval Architecture in the North and in the West of France." 
 (Mr. Sharpe"s Introduction to XL) 
 
 Published uithout date. 
 
 XIL— ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE PRIORY CHURCH OF ST. MARY AT TYNE- 
 MOL'TH. an Example of the Transitional Period of English Architecture. B}* Edmund 
 Sn.vKrE. M.A., F.R.I.B.A. London : Van Voorst. 
 
 Folio (21J by 14j-ins.),' 8s. Xo text. Four Plates drawn by T. Austin and Haworth 
 ' Fielding. Printed by McKie and Lawson, of Lancaster. 
 
 Published posthumously. 
 
 XIIL— THE CHURCHES OF THE NENE VALLEY, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE. By 
 Edmund Sharpe, M.A., F.R.I.B.A., and J. Johnson and A. H. Kersey. Architects. 
 London : Batsford. 1880. 
 
 Imperial 4to. (14f by 10i-in.). Cloth, £2 12s. 6d. 
 
 This work is a memorial of the Third Excursion of the Architectural Association, — in 1872. 
 
 It was almost completed under Mr. Sharpe's superintendence, but his death delayed the 
 
 progress of its publication. Part of the letterpress was found complete, and the rest was 
 
 compiled from Mr. Sharpe's Xotes. 
 
 Text, pp. i. to xix. — 1 to 43. One hundred and twelve Plates, — (sixty of ground stories, 
 
 thirty-five of Doorways, Sediliae, Piscinae, &c, and seventeen perspective views). Mr. John 
 
 Johnson and Mr. A. II. Kersey prepared the whole of the drawings and lithographic 
 
 transfers. The Plates were transferred to the stones, and printed by Mr. C. F. Kell. 
 
MR. SHARPE'S PUBLICATIONS. xi. 
 
 Separate Publications by Mr. Sharpe, issued in a Pamphlet Form. 
 
 I. — A Proposal for Supplying the Town of Lancaster with Water, and for Improving its Sewerage. By Edmund 
 Sharpe, M.A., Architect. Report of a Speech delivered to the Local Board of Health, December 24th, 
 1849. Lancaster : 1850. 
 8vo., 21 pages. 
 
 •2. — Report of a Meeting of the Local Board of Health, held July the 25th, 1851, to receive a Communication relative 
 to the Water supply of Lancaster, from Edmund Sharpe, M.A., Architect. Lancaster: 1851. 
 8vo., 20 pages. 
 
 3. — A Letter on Branch Railways, addressed to the Right Honourable Lord Stanley of Alderley, President of the 
 Board of Trade, &c, &c, containing suggestions for the erection of a System of Secondary Railways for 
 the Agricultural Districts. By Edmund Sharpe, MA, Fellow of the Royal Institute of British Architects. 
 With an Appendix and Map. London: Simphin, Marshall 8f Co. ; (Lancaster printed) : 1857. 
 Svo., 36 pages. Hap of Vale of Llanrwst, Is. 6d. 
 
 In connection with this may be mentioned : — 
 A Letter, dated October 1st, 1861, to the Right Hon. Sir Charles Wood, Bart., M.P., Secretary of State for India, as 
 to Tramways in India. 
 
 Sketch Map of Southern India. 
 
 4. — An Address to the Electors and Non-Electors of the Borough of Lancaster, on Electoral Reform, delivered in 
 the Music Hall, on Wednesday, the 18th of May, 1859. Lancaster. 
 svo.. 16 pagi 
 
 5, — Account of the Destruction, [by Order pf Mr. E. Sharpe, one of the Four Magistrates appointed to act as 
 Conservators of the Rivers of Denbighshire,] of the Stake Nets at the Mouth of the River Conway, on the 
 25th June, 1862, and of the Legal Proceedings resulting therefrom. Printed for the Use and Information 
 of Salmon Preservers and Fishing Associations. London: Johnson: 1865. 
 8vo., 11 pages. 
 
 6. — A Letter to the Right Honourable the Chancellor of the Exchequer on the Disfranchisement of the Borough 
 of Lancaster. By Edmund Sharpe, M.A. Lancaster r 1867. 
 
 8vo. Objecting to the disfranchisement by Mr. Disraeli's (1807) Bill. 
 
 7. — Four Letters on Colour in Churches on Walls and in Windows. By Edmund Sharpe, M.A., F.I.B.A. 
 Reprinted from The Builder. 
 
 a. Fn-.t Edition. London. Spon (Lancaster printed), 1870. svo., 27 pages. 
 6. Second Edition. London, Spoil. 1871. 8vo., 21 pages. 
 
 8.— Remarks on the proposed restoration of Kirkstall Abbey made by Mr. Edmund Sharpe at the closing meeting of 
 the Annual Excursion of the Architectural Association, at Lichfield, on Saturday, August 23rd, 1873. 
 Lancaster, — 1873. 
 
 8vo., 7 pages. 
 
 9. — A History of the Progress of Sanitary Reform in the Town of Lancaster from 1845 to 187.3 ; and an Account of 
 its Water Supply. Lancaster : 1876. 
 8vo., 53 pages. 1 Plate. 
 
xii. MR. SHARPE'S PUBLICATIONS. 
 
 Papers by Mr. Sharpe, in the Transactions of Different Societies. 
 
 Transactions of the Royal Institute of British Architects : — 
 1. — On the Subordination and Distinctive Peculiarities of the Mouldings of the Seven Periods of English 
 Architecture. Read at the Ordinary General Meeting, May 19th, 1851. 
 8 pages. 
 
 2. — Letter to Professor Donaldson, from Naples, dated January 7th, 1865. 
 
 2 pages, printed with "Occasional Papers." In this letter Mr. Sharpe stated that " the true history of Italian Mediaeval 
 Architecture has yet to he written." Fie was making preparations for writing and illustrating part of such a history when 
 he died at Milan in 1S77. 
 
 3. — The Architecture of the Cistercians. Read June 19th, 1871. 
 
 In "Transactions," 18/0—71. Pages 189 to 210. 1 Plate, (Cistercian Abbey, Model Planj. 
 
 Report of Proceedings, General Conference of Architects, 1871 : — 
 4. — Perspective Views in Architectural Competitions. Opening of Discussion, May 24th, 1871. 
 Pages 63 to 67. 
 
 The Journal of the British Archaeological Association : — 
 On the Ruins of the Cistercian Monastery of St. Mary in Furness. 
 
 Vol. VT. (1851). Pages 309 to 317 ; 359 to 374. Ground Plan and 24 Woodcuts. 
 
 The Archaeological Journal. Published under the Direction of the Council ot The Royal Archaeological 
 Institute of Great Britain and Ireland : — 
 
 1. — On the Geometrical Period of Gothic Architecture. Read at the Lincoln Meeting in June, 1S48. 
 
 Vol. IX. (1852). Pages 170 to 179. 
 
 " This formed the basis of a work subsequently published, in which 1 proposed a new division and nomenclature of the 
 
 styles of English Architecture." [Allusion to " Seven Periods" in Paper mid at Lincoln in 18C8, see below.) 
 
 2. — Report as to Byland Abbey Exploration. Dated November 14th, 1875. 
 Vol. XXXIII. (1876). Pages 2 to 5. 
 
 3. — Description of Byland Abbey. 
 
 Vol. XXXIII. (1876). Pages 5 to 8. 
 Separate Card (8J by 5J-ins). 
 
 Guide to the Description of Ely Cathedral, — delivered July 10th, 1854, and October 20th, 1873. Cam- 
 bridge (printed) : 1854. Lancaster (printed) : 1873. 
 
 The Architecture of the Churches visited by the Rojal Archaeological Institute, during the Meeting at Hull, 18G7, 
 chronologically arranged. 
 8vo. 2 pages. 
 
 Separate Card (8J by 5J ins). 
 
 A guide to the Architectural History of Furness Abbey, as described July 30th, 1868. Lancaster: 1868. 
 
 Reports and Papers read at the Meetings of the Architectural Societies of the Diocese of Lincoln, County of 
 York, &c, &c, during the Year 1868. Lincoln: Williamson. 8vo. : — 
 
 On Lincoln Cathedral. A Paper read at the Lincoln Meeting [of the Lincoln Diocesan Architectural 
 Society], June 17th, 1868. Pages 179 to 190. 
 
 This Paper was also published as a Pamphlet, pages 1 to 12 ; also in The Builder, July 4th, 1S68, pages 4S3 to 486 ; and 
 July 11th, 1868, pages 507, 508. 
 
 Separate Card (8J by 5J-ins.) 
 
 Guide to the Architectural History of Lincoln Cathedral, as described June 17th, 1868. Lancaster 
 (Printed). 
 
MR. SHAIiPE'S PUBLICATIONS. xm. 
 
 PAPERS READ BY Me. SHARPE BEFORE THE ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATION. 
 
 (The Transactions are not published in a separate form by the Association.) 
 
 The Study of the History of Church Architecture. An Address, delivered November 18th, 1870. 
 
 The Builder, vol. XXVIII., November 26tb, 1870, pages 941, 942. 
 The Building News, vol. XIX., November 25th, 1870, pages 386, 387. 
 
 The Nomenclature of Gothic Styles, and the Advantages of Architectural Excursions. Delivered before the Members 
 of the Third Architectural Association Excursion, at Stamford. 
 The Architect, vol. VIII., August 31st, 1872, pages 117, 118. 
 
 Against " Wholesale Restoration." An Address, delivered at Newark, before the Members of the Fourth Annua 
 Excursion of the Architectural Associalion, August 18th, 1873. 
 The Builder, vol. XXXI., August 23rd, 1873, page 672. 
 
 The Restoration of Kirkstall Abbey. Remarks at the Closing Meeting of the Architectural Association Excursion at 
 Lichfield, August 23rd, 1873. 
 
 The Builder, vol. XXXI., August 30th, 1873, page 683. 
 The Architect, vol. X., August 30th, 1873, page 105. 
 
 On the Ornamentation of the Romanesque, Transitional, and Lancet Periods in the North of France, as Exemplified 
 
 in the Cathedrals and Churches visited on the 1874 Excursion of the Architectural Association. Delivered 
 
 at Willis's Rooms, December 18th, 1*74. 
 
 Tlie Builder, vol. XXXII., December 26th, 1S74, page 1067 ; also vol. XXXIII., Jauuary 2nd, 1S75, pages 7 to 9. 
 The Building yews, vol. XXVII., December 25th, 1874, pages 790 to 794, with seven illustrations of pier capitals. 
 The Architect, vol. XII., December 26th, 1874, pages 355 to 359. 
 
 The Architecture of Charente : Some Account of the Buildings visited by the Architectural Association Excursion in 
 
 1875. Delivered June 13th, 1876. 
 
 The Builder, vol. XXXIV., July 1st, 1876, pages 632 to 634. 
 
 The Bui/ding Ifaci, vol. XXX., June 16th, 1876, pages 591 to 593, one woodcut ; alBO June 23rd, 1876, pages 633, 631, 
 
 nine illustrations (page 620}, three woodcuts (page 633) ; also pages 614, 645. 
 The Architect, vol. XV., Supplement, June 17th, 1876, pages 12 to 15. 
 
 On the Adaptability of Terra Cotta to Modern Church Work : its Use and its Abuse. 
 
 The Builder, vol. XXXIV., June 10th, 1876, pages 553 and 554, illustration (page 641, July 1st, lt76) of l'latt Church. 
 
 near Manchester, designed by Mr. E. Sharpe in 1843. 
 The Building News', vol. XXX., June 11th, 1876, pages 565 to 567 ; June 23rd, 1876, pages 618, 619. With illustration 
 
 (page 568) of Piatt Church (views and details) ; also double plate (page 648) of St. Paul's, Scotftfrth, designed by 
 
 Mr. E. Sbarpe ; and seven woodcuts. 
 The Architect, vol. XV., June 10th, 1876, pages 372 to 374. With illustration of I. ever Bridge Church (west view), 
 
 designed by Mr. E. Sharpe in 1841. 
 
 List of Some Articles, Letters, &c, Signed by Mr. Sharpe, contained in Different 
 Publications (Arranged Chronologically.) 
 
 The Classification of Mediaeval Architecture. 
 
 The Builder, vol. IX., September 6th, 1851, pages 557, 558 
 
 The Origin of the Pointed Arch. (A Letter, recapitulating the arguments used in different Papers by Mr. Sharpe in 
 1845, 1848, 1850, and 1853.) 
 
 The Building News, vol. XV., August 14th, 1868, page 560. 
 
 Letters on Colour and Architecture. 
 
 The Builder, vol. XXVIII., 1870, pages 621 and 742. 
 
xrv. MR. SHARPE'S PUBLICATIONS. 
 
 Letters on Colour in Modern Stained Glass. 
 
 The Builder, vol. XXVIII., 1S70, pages 781 and 821. 
 
 The New Law Courts. 
 
 The Times, Jauuary 15th, 1872. 
 
 The Nomenclature of Gothic Styles. 
 
 The Architect, vol. VIII., 1872. A Discussion. Mr. Sharpe's contributions will be found on pages 145, 160, 176, 
 191, 207, and 234. 
 
 " Counsels of Ignorance " (on the use of perspective, &e.). 
 
 The Architect, vol. IX., January 11th, 1873, page 17 . 
 
 Authorship of Designs. 
 
 The Architect, vol. IX., March 1st. 1873, page 111. 
 
 Archseologv and Architecture. 
 
 The Building News, vol. XXV., September 12th, 1873, page 297. 
 
 Archaeology not Architecture. 
 
 The Architect, vol. XI., January 3rd, 1874, page 12. 
 
 Canon King.-ley on Gothic Architecture. 
 
 The Architect, vol. XI., April 18th, 1874, page 219. 
 
 Remnrk< on Vaulting. 
 
 The Builder, vol. XXXII., December 12th, 1874, page 1035. 
 
 Tlie Building News, vol. XXVII., Deoember 4th, 1874, page 663. 
 
 Also in Sessional Papers, R.I.B.A., 1875, page 39, with an illustration. 
 
 On the Suggested Union of the Two Metropolitan Architectural Societies. 
 The Builder, vol. XXXIII., May 1st, 1875, page 401. 
 
 Miscellaneous Notes. 
 
 An Account of the Farewell Dinner to Edmund Sharpe, Esq., M.A., on his leaving Lancaster for North Wales, held 
 in the Assembly Room, Lancaster, appeared in the Lancaster Guardian, 8th March, 1856. 
 
 In the August numbers of the Building journals notices will be found with reference to the different Annual 
 Excursions of the Architectural Association from 1870 to the present time. 
 
 Presentation of the Royal Gold Medal to Mr. Sharpe at the Royal In titute of British Architects. Speeches by 
 Sir G. G. Scott, President, &c, June 7th, 1875. 
 
 Sessional Papers of the R.I.B.A., 1875, page 217. 
 Tlie Builder, vol. XXXIII , June 12th, 1875, page 521. 
 The Building News, vol. XXVIII., June I lth, 1875, page 654. 
 The Architect, vol. XIII., June 12th, 1875, page 351. 
 
 Announcements of Mr. Sharpe's Death, Memoirs, &c. 
 
 The Builder, vol. XXXV., May 19th, 1877, page 491. 
 The Building News, vol. XXXII., May 18tb, ls;7, pages 484 and 501. 
 The Architect, vol. XVII., May 19th, 1877, page 323. 
 
 Announcement by Sir G. G. Scott at the Royal Institute of British Architects, reported in the journals, e.g., The 
 Builder, vol. XXXV., June 2nd, 1877, page 550. 
 
 Memoir of Mr. Sharpe, read May 25th, 1877, before the Architectural Association, by Mr. John S. Quilter. 
 
 The Builder, vol. XXXV., June 2nd, 1877, page 562. 
 
 The Building News, vol. XXXII , June lBt, 1877, page 536. 
 
 Tlie Architect, vol. XVII., June 2nd, 1877, page 350. 
 
THE DOMED CHURCHES OF CHARENTE. 
 
 TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGES 
 
 List of the Plates... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1 to 3 
 
 Chapter I. — Preliminary ... ... ... ... ... 5 ., 17 
 
 Chapter II. — The Sixth Excursion of the Architectural 
 
 Association 18 ., 23 
 
 Chapter III. — Description of the Plates ... ... ... 24 ,. 48 
 
LIST OF THE PLATES, 
 
 Pl. 1. Angouleme Cathedral. View of West Front. 
 
 2. Parallel of Plans : — Churches at Cellefrouin, La Palud, Puyperoux, Mouthiers, 
 
 Lanville, Rouillac, Chatres, Trois Palis (Central Tower), Bourg Charente, Fleac, 
 St. Quentin de Chalais, and St. Michael d'Entraigues. 
 
 3 (a). Church at Cellefrouin. Section through Nave and Aisles looking West. 
 (b). „ St. Amand de Boixe. Section through Nave and Aisles looking East. 
 
 ,, 4 (a). ,, Chatres. Section through Crossing and Nave looking South. 
 
 (n). „ Boulet. Section through Nave, Crossing, and Chancel looking North. 
 
 ., 5 (a). ,, Mouthiers. Section through Nave, Crossing, and Chancel looking North. 
 
 (b). „ Berneuil. Section through Nave, Crossing, and Chancel looking North. 
 
 ,, 6(a). ,, Plassac. Section through Nave, Crossing, and Chancel looking North. 
 
 (b). „ St. Quentin de Chalais. Section through Nave, Crossing, and Chancel 
 
 looking North. 
 
 ,, 7. Church at La Palud. Section through Nave looking East, giving Elevation of Tower. 
 
 ,, St. Amand de Boixe. Section through Dome at Crossing. 
 
 ,, Rouillac. Section through Nave looking East, giving Elevation of Tower. 
 
 „ 8. „ Gensac. Section through four Western Bays looking North. 
 
 ,. Bourg Charente. Section through Nave, Crossing, and Chancel looking N. 
 „ „ Section through Crossing and Transepts, looking East. 
 
 „ Puyperoux. Section through Crossing looking East. 
 
 ,, 9. Angouleme Cathedral. Plan. 
 
 „ 10. ,., „ Section through Nave on line A B looking East. 
 
 „ 11. „ „ Section through Tower and Transept on line C D. 
 
 „ 12. Church at Cellefrouin. View of the Interior looking East 
 
 ., 13. ,, ,, Seven capitals. 
 
 ,, 14. Cellefrouin. View of Lantcrne des Morts. 
 
 ,. 15. Church at Boulet. Elevation of West Front. 
 
 ,. Hi. ,, ,, View of Interior looking East. 
 
 „ 17 (a). „ Montbron. Pendentive. 
 
 (b). ,. Rioux Martin. Pendentive. 
 
 (c). ,, Roulet. Pendentive. 
 
 „ 18. ,, Mouthiers. View of Interior looking East. 
 
 „ 19 (a). „ Mouthiers. Five capitals. 
 
 (b). ,, La Couronne. Capital. 
 
LIST OF THE PLATES. 
 
 Pl. 20. Church at Trois Palis. Section through. Nave looking East. 
 
 „ Section through Tower looking North. 
 
 •>i ., Central Tower from South-west. 
 
 22 ,, View from South-west. 
 
 23(a). „ St. Quentin. Four Capitals. 
 
 ii. „ Trois Palis. Three Capitals. 
 
 (c). ,, Eoulet. One Capital. 
 
 24. ,, Plassac. View from South-east. 
 
 25. „ „ View of East End. 
 
 26. „ La Palud. Elevation of West Front. 
 •>7 View of East End. 
 
 28. ,. Bourg Charente. View of West Front. 
 
 29. „ Lanville. Elevation of West Front. 
 „ 30. „ „ Three Capitals. 
 
 31. ,. St. Estephe. View of South side. 
 
 32. „ Gensac. View of West Front. 
 
 33. „ „ View of Interior of Nave looking V esl 
 
 34. f| „ Enlarged View of Bays on the North side of Nave. 
 ,. 35(a). „ St. Amand de Boixe. Sculpture, four figures. 
 
 IV). ,. Gensac. Sculpture, two figures. 
 
 „ 36. ., St. Amand de Boixe. View of Central Dome. 
 
 37. ., ,, „ Arch, Tympanum and Frieze of Doorway. 
 
 ,, ob. ,, u >, >• >> » 
 
 ,. J.'. .. .. ») n >* 
 
 40. „ ,, ,, Five Capitals and a carved Frieze. 
 
 ,, 41(a). Angouleme Cathedral. Two carved Friezes. 
 
 (b). Church at St. Amand de Boixe. Two Capitals and Arches, 
 
 (c). ., Aubeterre. Carved Frieze. 
 
 „ 42. ., Chatres. Elevation of West Front. 
 
 43 (a). ,, Chalais. Two examples of Arch-tympanum Sculpture. 
 
 (b). „ Chateauneuf. Figure subject in Tympanum of Arch. 
 
 ,, 44. „ Nersac. A Buttress. 
 „ Plassac. A Capital. 
 
 Chatres. Two carved Buttresses. 
 
 „ 45. „ Cellefrouin. Sketch, Elevation, Section, and Plan of Arcading on slab 
 
 lying against wall of Church. 
 

 
 LIST OF THE PLATES. 
 
 3 
 
 Pl. 45. 
 
 {Continued.) 
 
 Churc 
 
 7' 
 
 h at Plaizac. Two Corbels. 
 
 Chalais. Two details of Arcli enrichment. 
 La Palud. Two examples of Dogtooth Ornament. 
 Chatres. One example of Dogtooth Ornament. 
 Garat. „ ., 
 
 
 „ 46. 
 
 •i 
 
 Chalais. View of West Front, 
 
 
 ., 47. 
 
 »J 
 
 „ Central doorway of West Front. 
 
 
 ., 48. 
 
 - 
 
 Aubeterre. View of West Front. 
 
 
 „ 4*.t. 
 
 
 „ Arch-mouldings and Capitals. 
 Montmoreau. Arch-mouldings and Capitals. 
 
 
 50. „ Aubeterre. Arch-moulding. 
 Angouleme Cathedral. Capital. 
 Church at Lanville. Two Capitals. 
 
 51. „ Berneuil. View from South-west. 
 
 .52. ,, Chateauneuf. Archmould, Central Doorway of West Front. 
 
 „ Capital, Interior. 
 
 „ Impost, Mouldings, and Capitals, Central Doorway 
 
 53. .. Fleac. Six Capitals. 
 
 54. .. Bassac. Capital. 
 
 Licheres. Arch and Tympanum. 
 ., Chalais. Capital. 
 
 St. Amand de Boixe. Capital, 
 „ Dirac. Capital. 
 
 ., Montmoreau. Capital. 
 
 55. ., Nersac. Capital. 
 
 „ St. Michael d'Entraigues. Two Capitals. 
 
 Angouleme Cathedral. Part of carved Frieze. 
 
 56 (a). 
 
 CI 
 
 iur< 
 
 ih at La Palud. Five Capitals 
 
 (b). 
 
 
 " 
 
 Linars. Four Capitals. 
 
 57 (a). 
 
 
 M 
 
 Rouillac. Four Capitals. 
 
 (B). 
 
 
 >' 
 
 Cellefrouin. Capital. 
 
 c 
 
 
 .> 
 
 Gourville. Capital. 
 
 58. .. Roulet. Two Capitals. 
 
 „ Chatres. Specimen of Carving. 
 
 ,. Mouthiers. Capital. 
 
 St. Liguaire, Cognac. Capital. 
 „ Lanville. Capital. 
 
 St. Florent, La Rochefoucauld. Capital. 
 
 59. „ Champagne, Blanzac. View of West Front, 
 
 60. Map of Department. Placed ojipo&ite page 5. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 P1.6C. 
 
 T , ■ ■ ■ t , 
 
 Map of the Department. 
 
PRELIMINARY. 
 
 CHAPTEE I. 
 
 AS the peculiar characteristic observable in the churches of the Charente district to 
 which Mr. Sharpe introduced the Architectural Association is that of their domical 
 structure, evidently derived from a Byzantine source, a short discussion of their origin 
 and general character is a proper preliminary step to their description, and we shall 
 in this follow chiefly Mr. Sharpe's own remarks, given in the Lecture Rooms in Castle 
 Street, June loth, 1876, when he described to a large audience the results of the 
 excursion. The other sources of information to which we have access are, firstly, 
 M. Felix Verneilh's beautiful work on Saint Front de Perigueux, and the domical 
 churches of Aquitaine, " LArchitecture Byzantine en France (1851)": secondly, 
 " Statistique Monumentale de la Charente," by the Abbe Michon, 1844; also, "An 
 Inquiry into the Origin and Succession of the Styles of Romanesque and Pointed 
 Architecture in France," by Thomas Inkersley, London, 1850 ; " Architectural Studies 
 in France," by J. L. Petit, 1854; and " Academy Lectures," by Sir Gilbert Scott, 1879. 
 As Mr. Sharpe's lecture goes at once to the fountain-head, it is impossible to begin 
 better than with an abbreviated version of his remarks. 
 
 In the year of our Lord 540 there was to be seen rising in the 
 
 sta. Sophia. Eastern Metropolis of the Roman Empire a building, the like of which 
 
 had till then never been seen. It was a Christian church, dedicated to 
 
 Divine Wisdom, which name a contemporary writer shows to be equivalent to that of 
 
 ' the Word of God.' 
 
 The church of Sta. Sophia which Justinian began to rebuild in 532 was a 
 reconstruction of an earlier church of the same name built by Constantine the Great, 
 which was burnt in the rebellion against Justinian in the early part of the sixth 
 century. The restored church differed entirely from its predecessor, for Procopius the 
 historian, and another contemporary writer whose name has not been preserved, but 
 who in all probability had been employed in some capacity in the building itself, the 
 one being the description of an amateur, the other of an architect, both concur in 
 describing the building as unique and unlike anything that had previously been 
 
PRELIMINARY. 
 
 constructed. Procopius describes the effect of the novel building on his imagination 
 in such terms as to leave no doubt that he is describing the edifice which still exists at 
 Constantinople ; the other writer, on the other hand, occupies himself with all the 
 detail of the structure, with the purchase of the site, the materials, the practical 
 difficulties of the construction, the failures of the work, and the remedies' provided, &c, 
 with all the technical knowledge of a practical man. There is much difficulty in 
 understanding some of the technical terms of these descriptions written in the low 
 Greek of the later empire, and the only person who Mr. Sharpe believes ever attempted 
 the translation was Professor Willis, and there could be no fitter person, and he 
 abandoned the attempt. There exists, however, a Latin translation, but in this the 
 technical terms are left in the original Greek. 
 
 Mr. Sharpe had made diligent search in most of the public libraries of the 
 Continent, and in England, but had only been able to find one copy of this 
 technical description of Sta. Sophia, but he says he had long been at work, though 
 not continuously, at an English translation of it which he hoped some day to complete 
 if his life were spared. This, however, we fear has not been achieved. He referred to 
 the description by Procopius and the anonymous writer mentioned, for the purpose of 
 establishing the fact, or rather a strong presumption that Sta. Sophia at Constantinople 
 was the first building, sacred or secular, which exhibited the mediaeval dome as 
 distinguished from all previous domes, resting as it does, not upon a circular wall or 
 hollow cylinder, but on the summit of four arches, springing from solid square piers. 
 
 Procopius thus describes the central portion of the Church, as translated by 
 Mr. Sharpe. 
 
 " In the middle of the Temple are fixed four masses made by the hand, which are 
 called piers ; two on the north side, and two on the south side, opposite and equal to 
 one another, having moreover between them four columns on each side. 
 
 " These piers are constructed of very large stones, carefully selected and skilfully 
 fitted together by stone masons. They rise to a great height, and appear to the 
 beholder to be abrupt rocks. 
 
 " Upon these piers rest four arches forming four sides ; the summits of which 
 descending together upon the tops of 5 the piers are fixed there ; each arch thus joins its 
 neighbour, the rest of the building rising to an abrupt height. 
 
PRELIMINARY. 
 
 " Of these arches two are erected in open space, those namely which are on the 
 east and west sides ; the rest have a wall below them and small columns. Upon the 
 arches is raised a building of circular form on which at daybreak the sun first shines ; 
 it surpasses in my belief everything in the whole world. 
 
 " The four arches being united upon the four sides of a square. The 
 
 Pendenthes. intermediate spaces consist of four triangles, and the boundary line of 
 
 each of these triangles is formed by the approach of the arches to one 
 
 another, coming down to a sharp angle below, but expanding as it rises upwards until 
 
 it finishes above in a circular line which bounds the triangle on this side and forms 
 
 the other angles there.* 
 
 "And upon this circular wall rises an immense spherical dome (eo\oc is used by 
 Procopius, rpovXoe by the anonymous writer) which presents an admirable appearance ; 
 for it does not appear to rest upon a firm structure in consequence of the lightness of 
 the work, but rather to hang by a golden chain from heaven, and thus to cover 
 the place." 
 
 Mr. Sharpe then pointed out that the plan of the church of Sta. Sophia at Con- 
 stantinople became the typical plan of the Greek Church, and remained so throughout 
 the whole of the mediaeval period ; he did not, however, then propose to carry this 
 matter further, but referred those who wished to do so to the following works, 
 namely : — 
 
 The work of Salzenberg f on the " Early Christian Monuments of Constantinople," 
 ably epitomized and reviewed by Mr. C. C. Nelson in the transactions of the R. Institute 
 of British Architects, in 1855 ; the work of M. Texier on " Byzantine Architecture," 
 edited by Mr. R. Popplewell Pullan ; a volume by M. Couchaud on the " Churches of 
 Greece ; " J and the work of Sig. Fossati, the architect employed by the late Sultan 
 Medjid in the restoration of Sta. Sophia. § 
 
 The characteristic feature of Sta. Sophia, and one which ruled not only that, but 
 
 * Mr. Sharpe observes upon this description by the Byzantine historian that if instead it had been given by an 
 architect, as the description of the numerous examples that we saw last year in Charente, it would have caused no 
 surprise to those who took part in that excursion, but have been accepted by them as a very accurate description of 
 the very peculiar feature, the pendentive, that was constantly before their eyes in the course of that tour. 
 
 t Alt Christliche Baudenkmale von Constantinopel, Berlin, 1854. 
 
 J Choix d'Eglises Byzantines en Grece. Folio. Paris, 1842. 
 
 § Aya Sofia Constantinople. Published by Colnaghi, London, 1852. 
 
PRELIMINARY. 
 
 all the eastern churches of which we have any knowledge, is the large central dome 
 or cupola, balanced on the top of four serai-circular arches, which rested again on four 
 enormous square piers. This vast hemisphere, 107 feet in diameter, is the pre- 
 dominant idea of the design, to which all other parts of the plan are subordinate. It 
 rises out of and above them ; it is round this great central dome-covered space that 
 the other parts of the building are grouped, so as to form in plan pretty nearly the 
 figure of a square : it is in reality a parallelogram, of which the length from east to 
 west is somewhat greater than that from north to south. This is, in fact, the plan 
 of almost all the eastern churches built after the construction of Sta. Sophia; and 
 these form a remarkable contrast with the churches of the west, built on the type of 
 the Roman basilica. 
 
 During the next 500 years of the Christian Era, we find few traces of the 
 influence of Byzantine art on the churches of the west. It is not until the close of the 
 thousandth year that we meet in the church of S. Mark, at Venice, an example of 
 the same great typical feature which distinguishes Sta. Sophia, namely, the central 
 dome, carried by four semi-circular arches, resting on four square piers. Here, too, 
 we see four additional domes of nearly equal size and height, grouped round the 
 central one; and we thus see realized in the plan of a western church, for the first time 
 so far as we know, the true form of the Greek cross. 
 
 In S. Mark's, notwithstanding more recent alterations, we have no difficulty in 
 determining the primitive ground plan, and it is obvious that we have in it the same 
 great principle of construction which characterizes Sta. Sophia. It is true that 
 whereas the central dome of Sta. Sophia is 107 feet in diameter, that of S. Mark is 
 only 41, but to make up in some sort for this, we have the four other domes 
 of the nave transepts and choir, altogether giving a total domical surface comparable 
 with that of Sta. Sophia. 
 
 The connecting link between Sta. Sophia and the Churches of Aquitaine, which 
 includes the Charente district which forms the subject of this volume, is the 
 remarkable Church of S. Front at Perigueux. Mr. Sharpe's description of this 
 church was given orally, and he has left no MS., and for a more particular account of 
 it recourse must be had to other sources, particularly the work of M. Verneilh, already 
 referred to: who has described it most minutely and fortunately previous to its 
 restoration, or rather rebuilding, in 1863, and to this it will be requisite to return. 
 
PRELIMINARY. 
 
 Mr. Sharpe in continuation of bis lecture observed that the department of La 
 Charente, which practically coincides with the ancient Province of Angoumois, 
 contains 500 churches, of which 432 owe their principal character to the builders of 
 the twelfth century. In these churches the dominant feature, the Dome — which 
 almost invariably surmounts the intersection of the arms of the Cross, was imported 
 from the neighbouring Perigord, but it does not appear in Angoumois until the 
 commencement of the twelfth century. This feature, however, scarcely survived till 
 the thirteenth century, having been found unsuited to the vertical tendencies of Gothic 
 work, and although it may be considered as an experiment which had been tried and 
 failed, it yet produces a singular and striking effect on those who see the interior of 
 one of these churches for the first time. 
 
 These domes were seldom visible on the outside, but were covered by the timber 
 roofs and were used for spanning the centre of the crossing earlier than as vaulting to 
 the nave, which in the older churches is of the barrel vault form, either semi-circular 
 or pointed. And the earnest domes are often built upon squinches, the pendentives 
 proper being of later introduction. When the dome was used over the central crossing 
 it was not allowed to appear externally like a baker's oven or close kiln, but was 
 surmounted by a central tower, square or octagon, and covered by a conical spire of 
 remarkable character. These spires are never steep and are formed of stones so carved 
 as to give the appearance of scales, presenting the idea of a fir-cone or pine-apple, and 
 have thus obtained in France, the appellation " en pomme de pin." Of one of these 
 especially, at Trois Palis, careful drawings have been taken, to which reference will be 
 made in its proper place. 
 
 Another characteristic in these churches is the design of the West Fronts. 
 These appear usually to have marked the completion of the work and to have received 
 the greatest share of ornamentation. There are three primary vertical divisions, and 
 sometimes four or even more horizontally, counting the gable. 
 
 The ground story generally shows three large arches, of which the central is the 
 doorway. These churches, it should be observed, are almost always apteral. The 
 second story consists frequently of an arcade of five arches, and the arches in the 
 upper stories are more numerous, but this subordination is not invariable. All the 
 capitals are richly adorned with figures or foliage, and across some of the fronts is 
 carried a rich, broad frieze, continuous with the capitals of the ground story arcade. 
 
10 PRELIMINARY. 
 
 One feature is not uncommon which gives these fronts a meaning and an interest 
 beyond that which attaches to them as works of Art. In several of them, and usually 
 on the left-hand side, as at Chateauneuf, Ruffec, Aubeterre and Civray, is to be seen a 
 figure of a knight on horseback with accessories of a peculiar kind. The Abbe Michon 
 has assigned to them their full significance, namely, that each effigy represents the 
 feudal lord, or seigneur, to whom the consecration of the church is mainly due, and he 
 finds in the figure of a man prostrate before the horse the representation of a serf and 
 the emblem of feudal authority, and in that of a female standing before the horse, the 
 wife of the founder.* At Chalais a half opened tomb, with female mourners in front, 
 probably indicates that the death and burial of the founder took place before the 
 church was finished. At S. Amand de Boixe the actual sepulchre of the founder seems 
 to have been inserted after the completion of the West Front. 
 
 A most remarkable characteristic of the province is the extraordinary richness of 
 the ornamentation. It is of two kinds, firstly, figures of men, animals, and birds, and 
 nondescript compositions of all three, and secondly, of foliage only : the first kind is 
 more or less barbaric, the latter very rich and pure. As respects the chapiteaux histories, 
 although there may be some deeper meaning in them than at first catches the eye, they 
 more probably indicate the familiar struggles of the inhabitants in battle or in the chase 
 than any allusions to biblical texts, &c. 
 
 Mr. Sharpe then passed in review the series of drawings on the walls which had 
 been enlarged from sketches made during the excursion: 160 selected from 662: taken 
 during the fourteen days, but of course requiring much more time for their 
 enlargement in the form exhibited, and he took the opportunity of thanking publicly 
 those who had prepared them. He then alluded to the appliances of all kinds which 
 had been made use of in obtaining the measured sketches. Tapes and fishing rods 
 were part of the ordinary apparatus, but whenever anything unusual was wanted 
 ladders, ropes, and pulleys were requisitioned from the neighbourhood. To two of the 
 number fell the arduous duty of measuring the domes and vaults, one taking the 
 chief part of the climbing, the other, that of recording the measurements. It need 
 scarcely be mentioned that a vote of thanks to Mr. Sharpe was passed by acclamation, 
 and thus concluded this most interesting and important Architectural lecture, and one 
 
 * In Ford's Handbook of Spain describing the burial of the Cid, we find " He died in 1099, his body was 
 brought to Cardefia, near Burgos ; mounted on Babieca and placed armed on a throne with Tisona, ' the sparkling 
 brand,' in his hand, according to legend, as Charlemagne had been with his Joyeuse." 
 
PRELIMINARY. 11 
 
 which proved nearly the last that Mr. Sharpe addressed to a large audience, a task in 
 which he always acquitted himself well, and never, it seemed, more so than on this 
 occasion. 
 
 In his work* on the Byzantine Architecture of France, M. Verneilh has 
 demonstrated the extraordinary similarity between S. Mark's and S. Front. The 
 plans and even the dimensions are almost identical, and as respects the date there does 
 not seem to be a difference of more than 10 or 15 years between them, S. Mark's 
 preceding S. Front in date by about that interval. 
 
 S. Mark's was founded by Pietro Orseolo, in 977, and the works were in progress 
 till at least 1043, when the walls are said to have been completed by Dominico 
 Contarini, and more subsequently the mosaics by Dominico Selvo, in 1071. 
 
 Bp. Frotaire, who founded S. Front, died in 991. But S. Front, as all the great 
 early churches, took a considerable time in building, and was not consecrated until 
 1047. (See M. Verneilh, p. 116.)f 
 
 The architectural arrangement in the case both of S. Mark and of S. Front is that 
 of a central dome carried on Byzantine pendentives, and with another dome 
 surmounting each of the four arms of the cross, and the general plan is in each case, 
 practically the Greek cross : but more exactly so in that of S. Front than of S. Mark. 
 The four piers which carry the central dome and separate the five compartments of 
 the plan are massive square structures; they are subdivided however into four parts by 
 narrow arched openings. In S. Mark there are side aisles, but none in S. Front. 
 The domes in S. Mark are hemispheres, and the arches semi-circular and somewhat 
 stilted. The domes in S. Front are spheroidal, slightly jjrolate, that is, elongated 
 upwards, and the arches pointed— one of the earliest instances, probably, of the use of 
 the pointed arch in Western Europe, and strongly supporting the '' Ostrogothic " 
 theory of its introduction. 
 
 A distinction must be drawn, however, between the domes of S. Mark and 
 S. Sophia and those of S. Front, namely, that whereas the former rest upon true 
 pendentives, that is, all the four being segments of one and the same sphere, those of 
 
 * This work of M. Verneilh's is styled by Mr. Petit (Architectural Studies in France), " a most able, accurate, 
 and interesting work." 
 
 t Mr. Thomas Inkersley's work gives a record that S. Front was burnt iu 1120 ; p. 69, "1120, similiter incensum 
 est monasterium sancti Froutonis civitatis Petran-oricie." 
 
12 PRELIMINARY. 
 
 S. Front and its derivatives, with but few exceptions, depart more or less from this 
 character, and partake somewhat of the web form usual in the French Gothic vaulting. 
 This, however, does not discredit the Oriental origin of the feature, but shows the 
 influence of the French stock upon which it was grafted. 
 
 The church of S. Etienne, Perigueux, followed in general style that of S. Front, 
 but about half a century later, and in the churches of the Charente district we shall 
 find many imitations of the domes and pendentives of S. Front. The style prevailed 
 very widely in Aquitaine during the twelfth century, and although for the most part 
 confined to Perigord and Angoumois yet it threw out offshoots into more distant parts 
 of France, particularly the Abbey of Fontevrault, in Anjou. 
 
 It is interesting to enquire into the probable cause of the prevailing Byzantine 
 influence which led to the building of S. Front and the copies referred to. It is just 
 possible that the descendants of the Greek settlers of Provence having been pushed 
 westwards during the struggles which marked the expiring Empire of Rome, and the 
 inroads of the Goths, Huns, and Vandals, may have taken root in Aquitaine, and 
 favoured the introduction of a style coming from an ancestral source.* This, 
 however, is but a surmise. At any rate it is clear that there was a colony of Venetians 
 at Limoges towards the end of the tenth century. M. Verneilh has dwelt at some 
 length on this subject, and in addition to much documentary evidence points out the 
 names of places at Limoges, recalling the name of Venice, which either exist or 
 existed recently ; and as Limoges is only about 50 miles distant from Perigueux, the 
 connection between the builders of S. Mark and those of the almost parallel church of 
 S. Front is at least made out very plausibly, and M. Verneilh does not demand more 
 than a strong probability ; but he also very properly observes, it is not necessary to 
 prove that S. Front is a copy of S. Mark, but the two churches must at least have had 
 a common source, and if S. Front be not the daughter yet she is the sister. It is 
 moreover, an historical fact that the Dukes of Perigord gave great encouragement to 
 the Crusades, and may thus have been led to introduce Oriental art into the 
 province, f 
 
 * Mr. Fergusson, in his Handbook of Architecture, under the head of Aquitania, finds in these dome-roofed 
 churches the indication of the presence of an Eastern people, and claims the termination in ac of so many ot the 
 names as eastern also. The Abbe Michon, however, sees hi this final syllable only an ordinary Celtic suffix common 
 in Brittany, and indeed wherever the Celtic language dominates. 
 
 t Consult Le Pere L'Abbe. 
 
PRELIMINARY. 13 
 
 M. Verneilh points out that it is only S. Front which shows the complete Eastern 
 type, with five cupolas ranged on the principle of the Greek cross. The other nearest 
 approaches to it are S. Etienne in Perigueux, S. Jean de Colle, Saint Avit, Cahors, in 
 which two or three domes are ranged in file, Souillac, Solignac, Angouleme, and 
 Cognac, but he finds them all, especially the two latter, very much mixed with 
 Romanesque, to which influence the churches of Angoumois owe their exuberant 
 sculptural decorations, and he considers that the embellishment of S. Front was mainly 
 pictorial, but that this school of art did not extend beyond Perigueux. 
 
 M. Verneilh notices that in Perigord and Angoumois there are many churches 
 having cupolas springing from octagonal pendentives clearly of Romanesque origin, and 
 in some both these and others of the Byzantine type are found ; this combination 
 occurred in several of the Charente churches visited during the excursion, and will be 
 found to be illustrated in this work. But the most complete and the closest 
 derivatives of S. Front are in Perigord, namely S. Etienne in Perigueux, Souillac, 
 Solignac, and S. Jean de Colle, and at Cahors, just outside its borders, to the south- 
 east. Moreover, Mr. Petit has pointed out the identity of character in a design for a 
 building, which although it is in a different style, and has been executed only in model, is 
 yet so well known that it may be quoted as having an architectural existence, namely, 
 the first design prepared by Sir Christopher Wren for S. Paul's Cathedral, and which 
 he always considered preferable to that of the church actually built. Of this 
 Mr. Petit, "Architectural Studies in France, p. 78," says "He (Sir Christopher Wren), 
 may not have known S. Front, but he must have known its model, S. Mark, when he 
 conceived a design which had it been carried out would have given his cathedral the 
 finest interior in the world." 
 
 M. Verneilh attributes the general adoption of the domical vaults in Perigord 
 and Angoumois to the statical advantage they offered over the barrel vaults of the 
 earlier Romanesque architecture, of which the thrust had frequently overthrown the 
 side walls, a state of things of which several examples were seen during the excursion. 
 " Without any doubt a series of cupolas offers more guarantee for solidity than the 
 other kinds of vaulting already known. In this system the great arches which are 
 parallel to the axis of the building press mutually against each other and finally abut 
 at one end against the wall of the facade and on the other against the apse, and as to 
 the great arches at right angles to the axis of the nave, they fall upon great piers of 
 which the huge mass gives great lateral force of resistance, so that the side walls are 
 nearly preserved from all thrust whatever. And when this advantage was once 
 
14 PRELIMINARY. 
 
 discovered it would not have been surprising if it had penetrated even beyond the 
 Loire had it not happened that in the twelfth century, in the north of France, another 
 system had been adopted quite as solid and much more elegant, namely, the method of 
 vaulting with ribs and buttresses." (Verneilh, p. 162.) 
 
 It is easy to make an accurate comparison of the pressures exerted by the domed 
 vaults derived from the East with the pressures in the other forms referred to by 
 M. Verneilh, if we confine ourselves to the simplest forms of each — namely, the cases 
 (1) of the barrel vault, (2) of the domical vault in which the pendentives and dome 
 are parts of one and the same sphere, of which there are instances, as at Fleac, and (3) 
 the quadripartite Romanesque vault, with semi-circular cross springers : and on the 
 assumption that in the three cases the compartments are square and equal to each 
 other and ribless. It admits of easy geometrical proof* that the surfaces in the case 
 of the barrel and domical vaults would be exactly equal. But though the vertical 
 weight (assuming identity in thickness and material), would therefore be the same in 
 each case, the lateral thrust is very diiferent. The horizontal pressure of the barrel 
 vault pushes directly against the side walls, however much they may be weakened by 
 arches or windows: the domical vault presses outwards in the direction of the diagonals 
 of the square, and part is therefore counteracted by the thrust of the contiguous 
 compartments, or by the end walls, and the remainder admits of being provided for by 
 special buttresses or piers. Moreover, the centre of gravity is at a greater height 
 above the springing, and the pressure is therefore in itself more vertical. The egg- 
 shaped figure of the dome is also much stiffer than that of the barrel vault, more self 
 coherent, and may therefore be built of much thinner masonry. If compared with the 
 compartment covered with the quadripartite vault, the domical surface would be the 
 heaviest in the proportion of 3.1416 to 2.2832, or about 11 to 8, but the advantage of 
 the higher centre of gravity, and of the egg-shaped stiffness of figure, would still 
 remain in favour of the domical surface. When the dome, as in the majority of instances 
 in France, is formed of a smaller sphere than that which belongs to the pendentives, 
 the surface is a little in excess of the barrel vault, but the other advantages are not in 
 the least diminished. 
 
 In the year 1853 Professor Donaldson brought the subject of the Gallo-Byzantine 
 churches in and near Perigueux before the Royal Institute of British Architects, in a 
 paper of which the following are extracts, somewhat condensed. 
 
PRELIMINARY. 15 
 
 "The church of S. Mark at Venice was built on the Greek type at the latter end 
 of the tenth century. The arms of the cross were quite equal. The central dome rose 
 from four large piers, and there were four other domes at equal distance from the 
 central one. That over the western entrance was as large as the central one, but the 
 other three were smaller. 
 
 " Some years ago I was applied to to superintend the translation of the work called 
 ' Monumens Anciens et Modernes.' Among the subjects was the church of S. Front at 
 Perigueux ; I was struck with its resemblance to the churches of Greece, and feeling 
 much interested in it, had the drawings made of it, which are exhibited. 
 
 "A recent work by M. Felix de Verneilh, on Byzantine Architecture in France, 
 treated not only of the church of S. Front, but showed that there were also a great 
 number of churches in the south-west of France of the same character. 
 
 " Byzantine Architecture is the architecture of the ancient Greek Empire. The 
 Byzantine churches are those of a date later than Justinian, which were built wherever 
 the power of the Greek Emperors extended. Such were S. Vitale at Ravenna and 
 S. Mark at Venice, and even the more recent churches of Russia. 
 
 " That which these edifices have in common among them, and peculiar to them- 
 selves, a3 distinguished from other Christian buildings, is above all the cupola. The 
 cupola is not in these an accident, a simple modification of the vault, as in the base of 
 towers and intersection of the naves in the churches of the west, but is constantly 
 and systematically employed. 
 
 "There exist in the heart of the central provinces of France such edifices as the 
 above. Without root in that country, isolated in the national taste, they appear, in spite 
 of their rudeness and simplicity, to reveal clearly and incontestably an Eastern origin. 
 
 '' Already a learned architect, M. Albert Lenoir, had remarked the eminently 
 Byzantine physiognomy of the churches of Cahors and Souillac and he placed in the 
 same rank S. Etienne of Perigueux, which he knew only by a bad engraving, but by 
 patient research during six years M. Felix de Verneilh proved the existence of more than 
 forty monuments all of the same family : but the oldest, the largest, the most complete, 
 and the most curious of all is the ancient abbey of S. Front. This church by the Greek 
 cross of its plan, by its paved terraces, by its five cupolas, entirely disengaged from the 
 primitive roof, finally, by the purity of its style, proclaimed its relationship with the 
 religious edifices of the East remarkably close and direct. He proceeded to compare it 
 
1G PRELIMINARY. 
 
 with the chief examples of the latter, and found, to his great astonishment, that there was 
 one, the celebrated Basilica of S. Mark at Venice, the plan, the form, and almost the 
 dimensions of which it reproduces. 
 
 " To explain how this Eastern element developed itself is to treat of Byzantine 
 Architecture in France; and all buildings with cupolas actually existing in that 
 country were built in the neighbourhood of, and in imitation of, S. Front; none, 
 unless it be Fontevrault, are found beyond the limits of old Acmitaine ; none are found to 
 the south of the Garonne. It is in the centre, and the west in the dioceses of Perigueux, 
 Angouleme, Cahors, and Saintes, that almost all are concentrated. Churches are not 
 necessarily Byzantine because they possess cupolas, the distinction is in the form of the 
 pendentive. No cupolas with pendentives of a spherical form need further investigation. 
 In Perigord and Angoumois they decidedly form a distinct series. 
 
 " From the striking resemblance of S. Front to S. Mark, M. Verneilh supposed that 
 S. Front was designed by a Venetian rather than a Greek artist, and this led 
 Mr. Donaldson to advert to a singular circumstance in the history of commerce in 
 France, on which it has been already stated M. Verneilh had enlarged, namely, the 
 settlement of a colony of Greeks and Venetians at Limoges in the immediate vicinity of 
 Perigueux and the other towns containing the buildings which have been referred to. 
 The Venetians probably adopted this mode of colonization for the extension of their 
 commerce on account of the dangers of navigation beyond the straits of Gibraltar, arising 
 probably from the Moorish pirates and Norman enemies, and certainly Venetian 
 influence was greatly extended by the establishment of the colony referred to. 
 Although he had described the churches in question as Gallo-Bj^zantine, their peculiar 
 elements were only indirectly derived from Byzantium, through the medium of Venice, 
 which was then the great citadel of Art." 
 
 -■ 
 
 From these general remarks on the introduction of the Byzantine characteristics 
 into southern France we must proceed to the actual district visited by the Excursion 
 under Mr. Skarpe's guidance in 1875. 
 
 The date of the church of S. Pierre, or cathedral of Angouleme, is an important 
 starting point in the history of the Charente churches. 
 
 Bishop Gerard, of Blaye, is recorded to have built this cathedral, a primo lapide, 
 and to have laid the foundations in 1109, and at his death in 1136 the edifice is said 
 to have been completed. 
 
PRELIMINARY. 17 
 
 Mr. Petit however, agreeing in this with the Abbe Michon (Statistique Monu- 
 mentale de la Charente), considers the western bay of the nave earlier than Bishop 
 Gerard's work. In this opinion Mr. Sharpe did not concur. It seemed to him not 
 greatly to precede in date the bays to the eastward of it. Both Mr. Inkersley and 
 Mr. Petit, in opposition to M. Michon, consider the west front subsequent to the western 
 bay of the nave and decidedly of the Transitional period. 
 
 Mr. Inkersley, p. 166, says, " The west front presents a very remarkable example of 
 that profuse employment of statuary as a means of external decoration which 
 constitutes a prominent feature of the Transitional period." 
 
 M. Michon, p. 291, refuses to admit that the Byzantine style affected the Charente 
 buildings in general. " The first dome of the Angouleme nave was copied from 
 Perigueux, the rest were adopted from approval of the solidity of the structure." The 
 ornamentation is entirely Romanesque and is indentical with that of buildings which 
 have no cupolas. This agrees with the opinion of M. Verneilh, who remarks that the 
 sculpture at S. Front is of a very bald character, and moreover that it does not exhibit 
 the same Byzantine type that prevails in the Architecture. 
 
 The church next in importance to Angouleme Cathedral in the district in which 
 the Excursion extended, and which exhibits Byzantine features, is that of S. Liguaire de 
 Cognac, which seems to have been rebuilt about the end of the twelfth century, 
 following both in size and in style the cathedral of Angouleme very closely, but it has 
 suffered very much from the hand of time, and although the original forms can to a 
 great extent be recovered, this church does not offer so much to the architectural 
 student as several others of smaller scale. 
 
THE EXCURSION. 
 
 CHAPTEE II. 
 
 The Sixth Excursion of the Architectural Association. 
 
 ON the 28th of August, 1875, those members who had undertaken to meet Mr. Sharpe 
 at Angouleme arrived there, headed by the President of the Association, who 
 came, accompanied by the Secretaries — a most important factor in the success of the 
 Expedition. There were also present two or three others, who, although not members 
 of the Society, had enjoyed the advantage of Mr. Sharpe's leadership on several previous 
 excursions, and looked forward with much enthusiasm to this. The numbers altogether 
 amounted to 27. They found a convenient rendezvous in the Hotel de France, and 
 the city itself, besides its architectural objects, Avas a continual interest to them, on 
 account of its splendid situation, commanding from its lofty ramparts — part of which 
 were within the grounds of the hotel — a view over the vale of the Charente to a great 
 distance. 
 
 Mr. Sharpe had already been there some days, and had been busy in making 
 preparations for carrying out the programme, which was done almost to the letter. 
 Sunday, the 29th, was enjoyed as a day of rest after the journey, and in visiting 
 the cathedral, where the members were most courteously accompanied by M. Varin, 
 the Resident Architect, who had been engaged under M. Abadie in the restoration; 
 almost amounting to rebuilding the greater part of the structure.* In the evening 
 Mr. Sharpe arranged the general plan to be followed during the excursion, and assigned 
 to the principal working members of the party the particular objects to which they 
 should pay chief attention. Early on Monday, August 30th, the party started in 
 two carriages of the diligence type ; Mr. Sharpe, however, occasionally preceding in a 
 light gig, or curricle, which enabled him to examine some of the buildings by himself 
 before the arrival of the rest of the party. The points visited this day and the order in 
 which they were reached, were as follows, viz. 
 
 The churches of Fldac, Linars, Trois Palis, Nersac, and the octagonal chapel of 
 S. Michel d Entraigues. 
 
 Aug. 31. Starting again from Angouleme the objects were the Abbey of 
 La Couronne and the churches of La Palucl, Roulct, S. Estephe and Mouthiers. 
 
 Sep. 1. Leaving Angouleme by train we rejoined our carriages, which had been 
 left at the last place visited — an arrangement more than once resorted to — and after 
 a second examination of the extremely interesting church, namely, that of Mouthiers, 
 proceeded to Plassac, Mainfonds, Champagne, and Blanzac. 
 
 * M, Verneilh Lad pleaded ably and strongly against this restoration, but in vain. 
 
THE EXCURSION. 19 
 
 Sep. 2. Starting from Angouleme we readied PnyjJeroux, a church occupying an 
 isolated site, and partially in ruins, and then proceeded to Montmoreau, where the 
 church had been recently restored, and from thence to Chalais. There is a Chateau at 
 Montmoreau and also at Chalais, the latter belonging to Prince Talleyrand. 
 
 During this and the subsequent days of the excursion we were accompanied by 
 M. Fellot, a photographer, of Poitiers, by whom, under Mr Sharpe's direction, a number 
 of photographs were taken of the principal objects visited, a valuable addition to the 
 completeness of our investigation. The party slept at Chalais, billeted off amongst 
 various small inns and lodgings. 
 
 Sep. 3. The excursion of this day began by an early start on foot to S. Queniin, 
 and thence, rejoining our equipage, we passed through a beautiful country diversified with 
 walnut trees and vines (the produce of the walnut trees being used for making oil, the 
 vines for brandy), to Aubeterre. At Aubeterre, besides the church, there is a fine 
 Chateau of the fifteenth century, and, at the bottom of the rock on which it is built, 
 is a remarkable cave chapel of great size, called the church of S. Jean, excavated 
 in the soft sandstone rock ; the principal chamber being upwards of 40 feet high with 
 an aisle separated by two immense octagonal pillars left to support the roof, 
 which has been excavated in the form of a barrel vault, with intersecting groins. In 
 an apse at the extremity of this chamber is a large Renaissance tomb, also rock cut. 
 The Expedition again returned to Chalais for the night. 
 
 Sept. 4. Again we passed through a very agreeably diversified country and visited 
 in order : 
 
 Passirac Church, Chillac Church and Chateau, Berneuil, Coudeon, and Barbezieux 
 Churches. We dined at Barbezieux and returned to Angouleme. 
 
 Sunday, Sept. 5, was to most of us a day of rest, but some revisited the Abbey 
 of La Couronne, and on returning discovered a remarkably fine Chateau, named 
 L' Oiselerie, which is said to have been used by Francis I. as a rendezvous de chasse, and 
 dates from the fifteenth century, but a good deal of it is Renaissance. 
 
 It contained many picturesque points, and more especially an old-fashioned and 
 neglected garden, left much in its original condition. In the great orchard at the back 
 was the columbarium of the fifteenth century. A fine terrace, with a stream cf water 
 parallel to it forming a moat, retained by walls, ran in front of the principal 
 apartments. The garden contained the original arrangement of the beds, with a 
 fountain, enclosed by a low wall, with stone seats and shady trees round it; there was 
 also a small aviary and stone washing tanks, and a long stew pond enclosed with walls. 
 The grand entrance was formed by a somewhat fantastic design of a castellated 
 character, but of Late Renaissance date, with mimic battlements and machicolations 
 
20 THE EXCURSION. 
 
 curiously contrasted with those of a fifteenth century tower close by, which had the 
 real proportions and solidity required in wai'fare. 
 
 Sept. 6. The places visited this day were two churches, Chdteauneuf and Bassac, 
 after which we returned to Angouleme. 
 
 Sept. 7. After a photographic group had been taken, by M. Fellot, of the 
 members of the excursion, we visited the Bishop of Angouleme, who received us in an 
 extremely courteous, but dignified manner. The opportunity was not lost in endea- 
 vouring to enlist bis sympathies in favour of conservative restoration of churches. We 
 had been indebted to a letter of recommendation to the different clergy of the diocese, 
 which Mr. Sharpe had had the forethought to obtain from the bishop, for much 
 civility everywhere, and on one occasion especialby, nameby, at Blanzac, it had saved 
 us from troublesome interruption on the part of an over-officious gendarme, and Ave 
 were very glad to have this opportunity of thanking the bishop for his kindness. 
 
 The places visited this day were two churches, namely, Bourg Charente and Gensac, 
 and we arrived in the evening at Cognac, where we took up our quarters for the night. 
 
 After dinner we were invited to a soiree at the house of M. Robin, one of the 
 leading merchants of the place, an invitation to which we gladly responded, and it 
 proved a very agreeable and interesting reception. 
 
 Sept. 8. Wednesday. Starting from Cognac we passed the chateau of Gard 
 L'Epee, and came to the ruins of the Cistercian Abbey of Chalres, situated at the 
 bottom of a hill, as is usual with establishments of that order. A considerable portion 
 of the day was allowed at Chatres by the programme, after which we returned to 
 Angouleme by rail. 
 
 In the evening we were visited at our hotel by M. Abadie, and a lively but 
 amicable discussion ensued between him and Mr. Sharpe on the subject of destructive 
 restoration, especially with reference to what had been done at S. Front by M. Abadie. 
 
 Sept. 9. After a four o'clock breakfast the party started and visited these 
 churches, namely, Plaizac, Rouillac, Gourvilk, and Lanville, and then returned to 
 Angouleme. 
 
 The chief part of the time was devoted to Lanville. The main interest of the 
 church at Rouillac was confined to the exterior, and there for the first and only time 
 our operations were partly interrupted by a shower of rain. 
 
 Friday, Sept. 10. Starting from Angouleme, and merely glancing at Ventouse and 
 another church which did not offer much interest, we came to Cellefrouin, where is a 
 fine Romanesque church, and in the cemetery a pillar called Lanterne des Moris. 
 From thence through very pretty country to La Rochefoucauld, where is a fine 
 
THE EXCURSION. 21 
 
 Renaissance Chateau and a small but interesting church, S. Florent, and thence back to 
 Angouleme, where we met together for dinner for the last time, and discussed the 
 results of the expedition with which our leader appeared to be very greatly satisfied. 
 It is, however, worthy of remark that on this occasion Mr. Sharpe told us that he should 
 not be able to conduct an expedition in the following year, thinking, no doubt, of his 
 own proposal to visit Italy. 
 
 Saturday, Sept. 11. There still remained on the programme the highly 
 important church of S. Amand de Boixe, to which we proceeded, and after its exami- 
 nation the members of the excursion separated, the majority returning to Paris, but 
 Mr. Sharpe and a few others returned for a short time to Angouleme, and the next 
 day Mr. Sharpe and the diminished party visited the Chateau L'Oiselerie already 
 mentioned. 
 
 Thus ended this expedition, which will be remembered by all who took part in it. 
 It seemed to us then to be very happily timed, as we had been able to anticipate the 
 restorations which were imminent in many of the buildings, but it was also indeed 
 happily timed in another respect, viz., that it was the only opportunity which the 
 members of the Association could have had of enjoying the advantage of Mr. Sharpe's 
 guidance over this peculiarly interesting district. 
 
 It would not be right to conclude this part of the subject without recording that 
 during the transit from one place to another, as well as in the evenings after the work 
 of the day was over, the utmost genial harmony and good fellowship prevailed 
 throughout the whole party, which Mr. Sharpe, whilst he set the example of untiring 
 energy in work, was amongst the foremost to promote, and showed the happiest knack 
 in seizing fit occasions for, good-humoured merriment. 
 
 Nor would it be right to omit to record the courtesy with which we were received 
 invariably by the clergy and the educated classes. Our proceedings could not fail to 
 elicit a good deal of curiosity amongst the inhabitants generally of the towns and 
 villages, but this always took a good-humoured direction, although it might sometimes 
 be a little inconvenient. 
 
 The greater number of the places mentioned in the above sketch of each day's 
 proceedings will come again under review in the description of the plates, but of a few 
 which have not been illustrated a short verbal description seems desirable. 
 
THE EXCURSION. 
 
 At La Couronne, visited on the second day, are the ruins of a very fine Abbey 
 which are not of the Perigueux type, but of the more usual Angiovine Transitional. 
 The foundation was in 1171, the completion in 1201. All the arches of construction are 
 pointed, all of decoration semi -circular. The nave is gone, but the walls of the choir 
 and transept and its chapels remain, all nobly arcaded. The three aisles appear to 
 have been all of the same height. Some of the capitals so much resemble the Classical 
 Composite as .to suggest at first sight Renaissance work, but when carefully studied it is 
 evident that what Renaissance there may be is of the twelfth century. Throughout it 
 is essentially Romanesque, and not Gothic, the ornament is full of intertwined creatures, 
 and there is the same six-lobed dog-tooth which is found in the neighbouring church of 
 La Palud. It is most tantalizing to think that this fine church escaped the Revolution 
 uninjured but has been destroyed, since 1808, for the sake of its material. 
 
 Mainfonds (a magna funte), visited on the third day, has the plan of a Greek cross 
 with barrel vaults over nave, transepts, and choir; but with a central dome on 
 pendentives, with slightly pointed arches and tall piers. The transepts originally had 
 apsidal chapels towards the east. The exterior and interior are plain, the lower story 
 of tower circular, the upper square, but of later date. 
 
 Passirac, a church formerly connected with a Priory, has a nave of four bays, with a 
 pointed barrel vault and with semi-circular wall-arches both to the internal and the 
 external walls. It has transepts and a choir, prettily arcaded and richly carved. The 
 octagonal central dome rests od arches almost imperceptibly pointed, and small squinches. 
 The west front has no arcades, but a doorway only ; but there was a second door on the 
 south side, with a second story of three arcades. The entire church is Transitional. 
 
 Chillac was a church of minor interest, the interior was ruinous. The barrel 
 vault of the nave had been too heavy for the walls, and the cupola of the crossing was 
 cracked, but the west front was of good character, with a second story of seven arcades 
 divided from the ground story by a fine corbel table. Near the church was a pictu- 
 resque Chateau, which contained a very splendid chimney-piece of the Early Renaissance. 
 
 Couddon retains a good but decayed west doorway, with the details very similar 
 in character to the work at Aubeterre and Chalais, and evidently proceeding from the 
 same school. The exterior of the nave was remarkable for the enormous development 
 of the buttresses, some of them twelve feet wide and with twenty feet projection, which, 
 in a church of very moderate size and height, presented a very strange apjiearance. 
 These large buttresses in this and several other churches had been added at a period 
 subsequent to their first erection to counteract the great thrust of the barrel vaults. 
 
 Barbezieux exhibited buttresses of a size even more extraordinary than Coudeon. 
 The church itself has been much altered, and the choir is gone, but the nave retains 
 
THE EXCUESION. 23 
 
 some of the original design, which is very fine and of an uncommon character in this 
 district, more resembling the Abbey of La Couronne than any other example we met 
 with. It appears to be Transitional, but has no Byzantine features. It consists of three 
 aisles, which are all of the same height. The piers are clustered, and consist of eight 
 large and lofty shafts, having tall capitals of Corinthian character, placed diagonally 
 as well as cardinally. They evidently carried ribs and arches springing in eight 
 directions. 
 
 Bassac. This church which is of Transitional Architecture, but very late in the 
 style, is apteral, and has no transept nor any distinctive feature to divide the nave from 
 the chancel. The whole consists of four bays covered with quadripartite vaults, 
 carried by clusters of seven vaulting shafts. The fashion of the district shows itself in 
 the general character of the west front, and in the tower and spire on the north side, 
 which stands against the third compartment, reckoning from the west. It is supported 
 on piers of its own, which are lofty and have pointed arches of two square orders 
 carrying internally a cupola pierced with a large circular opening. Externally the 
 tower has four stages, of which the lower two are of the original building of the 
 twelfth or very early thirteenth century. All are variously arcaded, the lower two 
 with round arches, the upper two with pointed. Each stage is set back within the one 
 below it. The tower has pyramidal pinnacles at the angles, and a conical spire of the 
 usual pine-apple scale character. The vertical lines of the newer part of the tower 
 have been carried up in a somewhat haphazard manner, but the proportions have been well 
 studied, and the general effect is good, and with the exception of the spireless tower of 
 Angouleme Cathedral, this is by far the most importanl in the district. The west front, 
 of which the detail is Gothic, is yet designed on the principles of the triple division, etc., 
 but the carvings exhibit ordy foliage. Mention should be made of the fortified turrets, 
 or " quoins d'avantage," which occupy the north and south angles at the summit of the 
 west front, which were built in the fifteenth century to render the church a defensible 
 stronghold dui'ing the wars with England. These turrets have their own supports 
 and proper shaped buttresses, carried up from the very base, and which materially 
 improve the composition of the west front by strengthening its angles. Many of the 
 churches in the neighbourhood have some fortified portions added during the wars of 
 religion in the sixteenth century, but added without the slightest reference to the 
 architecture of the buildings. 
 
 The church of Bassac is surrounded by remains of the cloister and other buildings 
 of the monastery to which it formerly belonged. 
 
 Plaizac has a good simple doorway of four orders, and also a very handsome cor- 
 belled cornice externally on the south side, and a dome surmounted by a small tower. 
 
24 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 Description of the Plates. 
 
 See the frontispiece, plate 1, the ground plan, plate 9, and Sections, plates 10 and 11. 
 
 ^THE date of the nave of S. Pierre of Angouleme has already been 
 
 Angouieme 1 discussed, and following Mr. Sharpe, we see no reason to attribute 
 Cathedral. e r ' 
 
 to it so high an antiquity as do some of the French antiquarians, who 
 
 assign it to the beginning of the eleventh century ; and there seems to be little reason 
 
 why we should not implicitly receive the record that the cathedral which we now see 
 
 was commenced a primo lapide by Gerard de Blaye about 1130 a.d. 
 
 The plan, pi. 9, shows that it is a large apteral cross church, extremely simple and 
 massive, and with towers at the extremities of the transept, as our own cathedral of 
 Exeter. The facade can scarcely be earlier than the very end of the twelfth century. The 
 cupola which covers the ci*ossing is very peculiar in its shape, being on plan rather a 
 square with the corners rounded off than circular. All the cupolas rest on pendentives' 
 but in this cupola they are much modified from the true Byzantine type. The cupola 
 itself rests on a drum pierced with windows, an unusual form in this district. It was 
 thus described by Mr. Petit, who saw it before its restoration : " The central octagon 
 is very plain. The diagonal sides are narrower than the cardinal, the windows in the 
 former, throwing light into the dome, are original ; the latter were pierced at the 
 time of the restoration of the church after its injuries by the Protestants.'' The short 
 bays of the transept, which occur between the crossing and the towers, are richly carved 
 with foliage of great purity. The capitals in these compartments also are quite 
 genuine, but for the most part the carvings have been much restored, very skilfully, no 
 doubt, but to a degree almost amounting to the obliteration of the evidence of what 
 they originally were. 
 
 The western facade differs in character from the severe simplicity of the interior, 
 and from the external architecture of the transepts, and fails to convey an impression 
 of power, although it does of elegance. Its want of dignity arises from the endeavour 
 to compress too much into the restricted width which the apteral arrangement affords. 
 The subdivisions also differ from the ordinary Angoumois type, in which the facade is 
 divided primarily into three parts, but here it is divided into five, and this is also 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 
 
 unfavourable to breadth of effect. The upper story, including the gable and the two 
 turrets, is entirely new, the work of M. Abadie, but below the general frieze (so to call 
 the band of roses surmounted, firstly, by a plain course, and then by a moulding 
 carved into small billets or chequers) a considerable portion of old work remains ; all, 
 however, has been subjected to a very free restoration. The principal sculptured 
 groups are entirely new, but of those representing S. Martin of Tours on the right and 
 S. George on the left there may have been sufficient traces to identify the subjects. 
 At least both M. Verneilh and the Abbe" Michon agreed as to these two subjects, but 
 not as to their relative places (Verneilh, p. 235). Among the upper figures and 
 ornaments, however, there is a good deal left of the original. Various details of the 
 carving are given in pi. 41, which shows some of the friezes of the West Front, and in 
 plates 50 and 55. Before dismissing the plan, the great internal development of the 
 piers should be noticed, which are, practically, buttresses, with greater internal than 
 external projection. They impart an impression of solidity to the interior of the 
 church, which is very striking. 
 
 Previous to the restoration by M. Abadie, the central dome was much lower, and 
 the greater part of it was hidden externally by the walls of the octagon. The sections, 
 plates 10 and 11, show it in its present state. 
 
 Turning now to the general sheet of plans, it may be noticed, firstly, that, for the 
 sake of comparison, they may be considered as drawn to the same scale, any minute 
 differences in this respect having arisen through the reduction by photography ; and 
 secondly, that the scale to which the plan of Angouleme Cathedral is drawn, pi. 9, is some- 
 what larger, but not very greatly so, and the area of that building exceeds that of the 
 largest of the churches shown in pi. 2, namely, Lanville, in the proportion of more 
 than three to one. 
 
 After the Cathedral, Cellefrouin, called from cellam Sancti Frontini, 
 Ceiiefrouin. takes the precedence as probably the oldest example. This church, 
 which consists of choir, transept, and aisled nave, is entirely Ro- 
 manesque, and is interesting as showing what was the stock upon which the Byzantine 
 element, derived from Perigueux, was grafted. The section, pi. 3, and the detail 
 plates (13, 45, 57), together with the perspective of the interior, pi. 12, will show that it 
 
26 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 
 
 is a fine masculine specimen of rather early Romanesque. The crossing has a domical 
 vault, but very far from being spherical, as it springs from slightly cut-off corners 
 supported by squinches. The rest of the vaults are barrel-shaped. Those of the aisles, 
 which are remarkably narrow and lofty, are stilted so that their crowns are level with 
 the nave vault. The pier arches have two square orders. The enormous size of the 
 capitals [the bases are covered owing to the floor having been raised on account of 
 damp] and the massiveness of the piers are the most striking features. The finest 
 architecture is that of the choir, nearly of the same date as the nave, that is, about 
 1050. The cornice is supported directly by tall shafts and corbels without the 
 intervention of an arcade. This description applies also to the small apses of the 
 transept. In the West Front the shafts which mark the main divisions terminate in 
 small conical caps, and lofty plain arcades without angle shafts reach as high as the 
 springing of the gable. Judging from Mr. Petit's representation of Courcome, p. 108, 
 there must be much resemblance between these two churches, both inside and out. 
 
 In the cemetery situated on an eminence overlooking the church and village is a 
 finely-pi'eserved specimen, dating from the twelfth century, of a " Lanterne des Morts," 
 pi. 14, namely, a pillar of eight attached shafts raised on a pedestal with plain capitals, 
 and surmounted with a conical spire " a pomme de inn." There is a well-preserved 
 specimen of a similar curious mediaeval relic at Ciron, in the department of Indre. 
 (See Viollet le Due, vol. vi.) 
 
 In connection with the church of Cellefrouin, should be mentioned 
 La Rochefoucauld, that of S. Florent, at La Rochefoucauld, described below, and not far 
 
 distant, which is also distinctly Early Romanesque. The influence of 
 S. Front, Perigueux, as Mr. Sharpe was very particular to point out, had not at that 
 period extended to Angoumois. 
 
 Of the church of Roulet, a section is given in pi. 4, and the West Front 
 Rouiet. m pi_ i5 ? an( j an interior perspective looking towards the west door in 
 
 pi. 16, and a view of the pendentive of one of the domes, pi. 17; also, 
 some of the details, pi. 58. Of this church, called by the Abbe Michon one of the most 
 elegant of those which have a series of domes, Mr. Petit has given a careful description, 
 which is the more valuable as since he saw it the church has undergone restoration. 
 He considered the dome of the crossing, which is elliptical on plan, older than those 
 of the nave, which have Byzantine pen den tives, and to "the latter he assigns as their 
 date the very end of the twelfth century. " The piers present a cluster of five engaged 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 27 
 
 shafts and columns, both the longitudinal arches against the wall as well as the trans- 
 verse arches having two square orders, both are pointed." This grouping of shafts has 
 a remarkably good effect, and the dog-tooth moulding, which marks the springing of the 
 domes, is a very good feature. M. Verneilh calls attention to the solidity resulting from 
 the domical structure, that the buttresses have very small projection, but, nevertheless, 
 the walls are perfectly upright. He admires, also, the bases with their foliated corners. 
 The tower had been restored and the spire rebuilt in 1875 by M. Abadie, but it seems 
 to have had substantially the same features when Mr. Petit saw and described it. " The 
 tower is square, with fine Romanesque belfry windows (two double ones on each face), 
 and a conical spire with the fir-apple ornament. The parapet, if original, has a very 
 peculiar style of ornament, namely, a sort of bead or torus set vertically." We shall 
 find further on, at Trois Palis, a genuine tower parapet answering to this description. 
 (See plates 20 and 21.) The tops of the domes externally are worked to an even face, 
 as though they had been intended to be seen externally, as seems to have been the 
 case at S. Front : usually in Angoumois they are rough. The West Front, shown on 
 pi. 15, although not rich, is very handsome and well designed. The three tall arches 
 combining the two arcaded stories are very artistic. Neither this front nor the interior 
 seem to have suffered at all severely from the hands of the restorer. 
 
 Mouthiers, one of the most interesting monuments we saw, was 
 Mouthiers. entirely unrestored. The plan of this church is given in pi. 2, the 
 section in pi. 5, the perspective interior in pi. 18, and details of six of 
 the capitals in plates 19 and 58. Over the crossing is a very perfect dome slightly 
 elliptical on plan. The arches have two orders and are as usual somewhat pointed ; 
 in some instances they are very decidedly so, here very slightly. This form of arch 
 necessarily introduces a modification upon the true Byzantine pendentive, which 
 requires for its simplicity of form semicircular arches. The proof depends upon 
 this. Every plain section of a sphere is a circle. A semicircle may therefore 
 make a plain section with a hemisphere, but any other shape will wind, i.e., 
 make a curve or curves of double curvature, but by reference to the perspective 
 it may be seen how the irregularity is got over. The extrados of the second 
 order of the arch is made so much less pointed than the intrados as practically 
 to fit the nearly spherical surface of the pendentive. The breadth or space between 
 the intrados and extrados varies a good deal, being much less at the top than at the 
 bottom of the arch and between these two lines — one being that of the extrados 
 lying on the pendentive sphere and the other being the intrados forming the arris of 
 the second order of the arch — the adjustment is made by the face being worked into a 
 
28 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 
 
 concave surface, the successful treatment of which was doubtless the result of experience, 
 and probably if the pendentives themselves were very accurately measured it would 
 be found that they were frequently somewhat dished out of the true spherical form to 
 assist in the adjustment — but they generally satisfy the eye. Immediately above the 
 horizontal band or cornice above the pendentives from which the dome starts, and at 
 the cardinal points, are four small square-headed openings pierced through the dome. 
 These occurred also at Angouleme, and indeed generally. It is difficult to explain for 
 what they could have been intended unless for a temporary purpose, such as for placing 
 the timbers used for centering the dome. The vaults of the church are barrel-shaped, 
 ribbed in the nave and plain elsewhere, all slightly pointed. The vault of the nave has 
 required the addition of large buttresses, and also, as the Abbe Michon has pointed out, 
 the walls have received a complete casing of Gothic architecture, doubling their 
 original thickness, which would otherwise have been too feeble for the great weight of 
 the vault. 
 
 The plan of the East End should be remarked in connection with that of 
 the church of Puyperoux also given on the plate. In the latter it will be noticed 
 that evidently an inconvenience as respects ritual had been discovered in these apteral 
 churches, which in that example had been remedied in a somewhat rude manner by 
 forming pierced passages behind each of the angles of the crossing. Those at Puyperoux, 
 it, is evident, were afterthoughts ; but here at Mouthiers a communication was formed 
 at the south-east angle contemporaneously with the construction of the south transept, 
 turning it into a very effective architectural feature, and with evident intention of 
 treating the north-east angle in the same manner. The use of these passages, giving 
 the clergy and their attendants access to the choir, independently of the central 
 approach, will be evident at once. At the extremity of this passage is a stone altar. 
 The capitals of the nave, some of which are shown on plate 10, are among the most 
 curious examples of intertwined imaginary animals and foliage which we met with durinf 
 the Excursion. There appeared to be much fondness for figures of men with one head 
 and two bodies. The Abbe Michon says: — "Les chapitaux des colonnes meritent 
 d'etre etudies, ils sont d'une grand barbarie." The exterior of the church is good, 
 especially the East End. The tower is of comparatively late architecture, and of 
 irregular shape. The church for the most part is of the late Romanesque or early 
 Transitional period, all the arches of construction are pointed, whilst those of decoration 
 are semicircular. The apse has an exterior arcade corresponding to the inner. 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 29 
 
 The small church of Trois Palis, which was found perfectly untouched 
 Trois Palis, by the hand of the restorer — indeed, it is almost disused as a place of 
 worship — is illustrated in plates 20, 21, 22, giving respectively the 
 elevation and section of the central tower, a view of the belfry story of the same, more 
 at large, and a perspective view of the church from the south-west. Some details are 
 given in plate 23, and there is a plan of the compartment under the tower in plate 2. 
 This plan is remarkable as showing the germ of a transeptal arrangement, giving a 
 great deal of character to a small village church. Mr. Sharpe was inclined to think 
 that the church originally was a small cross church, and that the transepts had been 
 cut off and the nave widened subsequently. The arches under the tower are semi- 
 circular, of two orders, and very massive, with true pendentives and a small dome. 
 The tower, which is well preserved, is one of the most perfect in the district, having the 
 usual conical spire, with the fir-apple scales. The angle pinnacles remain, but the top 
 finial has perished. The cornice of the upper story — which resembles that at Roulet — 
 consists of an invected band or row of vertical billets slightly projecting over the face 
 of the tower. This spire is supposed to be one of the earliest in the district. The short 
 choir is covered with a barrel vault, and the nave of two bays was probably also thus 
 covered originally, but the vault has fallen. The chief feature of the West Front, of 
 late Romanesque architecture, is the Apocalyptic group in the gable, very rudely 
 sculptured. 
 
 Plassac is also a very characteristic village church. The longitudinal 
 piassac. section is given in plate 6, and plates 24 and 25 represent respectively 
 the general view of the East End, and of the apse more at large. Some 
 further details are given in plate 4-i. The triple shafts by which the bays of the apse 
 are divided externally have fine capitals, and the corbelled cornice is very good, 
 windows are pierced only in the alternate bays ; an arrangement noticed elsewhere, for 
 instance at Bourg Charente, and one which in this bright climate produces an excellent 
 effect internally. The base of the tower is square, gathered by flat broaches into an 
 octagon, which exhibits an elegant open belfry with twin arched openings in each face, 
 surmounted by the usual conical spire which has a slight entasis. The West Front, 
 has three arches below, then five in the story above, and a third story with an arcade 
 of three which range over the three middle arches of the story below them ; the 
 gable is plain. A huge buttress has been added at the south-west angle. This 
 church is quite detached from other buildings, and stands on elevated ground, 
 and up to the time of our visit had not been injured by any restoration. 
 The nave consists of three bays, covered with a pointed barrel vault, and has a 
 
30 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 
 
 central dome with pendentives. The apse, which is so fine a feature externally, is no 
 less so inside. The chancel vault is like that of the nave. The wall exhibits eleven 
 arcaded bays, of these five were originally pierced for windows. A cornice moulding of 
 great projection is carried by bold corbels between which are square panels or metopes 
 covered with wreathed knots of foliage, and the soffit is panelled also. The capitals, 
 composed of imaginary creatures, combined with acanthus-like foliage, are peculiarly 
 graceful, and seem to show that the artists had not neglected to study classical forms. 
 
 One of the plans upon plate 2 is that of the Church of La Palud, 
 La Palud. and the section is given on plate 7, the West Front on plate 26, and a 
 general view of the East End on plate 27, and some details in plates 45 
 and 56. The church is of two periods. The four Easternmost Bays of the Nave are 
 early. The arches of the crossing and the apse, and also the two bays of the Nave 
 next the West Front, and the front itself are of the later Romano-Byzantine style 
 peculiar to the district. To the earlier period belong the stout columns which carry 
 the transverse bands under the semicircular barrel vaults of the older part of the Nave, 
 and which have large heavy straight-sided cubical capitals with an impost moulding, 
 and clumsy and unequal bases of three torus rolls over a splay. This portion has 
 original semicircular-headed clerestory windows pierced into the barrel vault, and which 
 therefore form groins of double curvature. The transepts have barrel vaults and 
 eastern apses, and the arches of the crossing which have two square orders are 
 very slightly pointed. All the capitals of the later period, whether in the interior or 
 on the East Front, are ornamented with imaginary creatures mixed with foliage — 
 " chajriteaiix histories." The apse is semicircular in seven bays, and with one addi- 
 tional straight bay forms the eastern arm of the Cross. The cupola at the intersection, 
 which is octagonal, rests on Romanesque squinches, and above is a very elegant octagon, 
 well tapered from its base by means of weathered stages, and surmounted by a conical 
 spire with slight entasis.* Each side of the belfry has a couplet of round arches on 
 shafts, the central one bisecting the real opening. The West Front is a very simple 
 and agreeable composition. The arches of the ground story which are well balanced 
 in design are carried by square pilasters with good capitals. A neat arcade of seven 
 forms a second story, above is a window well proportioned to the rest, having two square 
 orders. The niche in the left-hand portion of the ground story evidently contained 
 the founder's figure, and below was his monument. The church is an extremely good 
 
 * A very moderate entasis in a conical spire is apt to produce a great impression on the eye. The representations 
 in plates 7 and 27 have, no doubt, been influenced by this consideration. 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 31 
 
 specimen of a village church, and at the time of our visit was in a thoroughly genuine 
 condition. 
 
 The plan of Bourg Charente will be seen, by reference to pi. 2, to 
 Bourg Charente. consist of a nave with two domical bays, a transept, and a central dome 
 — smaller than those of the nave — and three apses. The longitudinal 
 section is given in pi. 8. 
 
 The pendentives of the nave cupolas grow out of the transverse and wall 
 arches in the manner explained in the description of the dome of Mouthiers, but 
 the cupola of the crossing is not so regular. The extrados of the arch stones 
 is not curved carefully to meet the pendentives and the lower courses of the 
 latter intersect them in straight lines, more like squinches than proper penden- 
 tives, which should be regularly curved from the bottom. The cornice or string 
 of the dome also is by no means circular on plan, and the points of the lateral arches 
 fall three courses below it, whilst those of the east and west arches touch it. The 
 West Front, pi. 28, is somewhat peculiar from the great preponderance of the 
 central or doorway arch, and the delicate and highly enriched arcade of the middle 
 story. The principal apse of this church is remarkably fine, but it has more of a 
 Rhenish or Lombardic than of the Angoumois character. Externally the capitals 
 of the shafts which divide the bays carry a bold cornice with four fine corbels 
 between each capital, and each bay has an arcade of three small arches above those 
 of the window story. These arches have two square orders shafted. There is also a 
 range of arches of one order, shafted, below the windows. It should be remarked that 
 all the transverse wall and crossing arches in this church spring from pilasters and not 
 from shafts. 
 
 Lanville — after Angouleme, Cognac, and S. Amand de Boixe, the 
 LanvWe. largest church in the district, which we visited — will be seen from 
 pi. 2, to be remarkably simple in its general plan. On the north 
 side are the Gothic ruins of the abbey, with which it was connected, of the 
 order of San Genevieve, which was destroyed in the sixteenth century. The 
 nave consists of three bays, but the vaulting is later than the walls, and is of the 
 quadripartite Gothic form. The central dome, apse, and transepts have all the usual 
 Angoumois character. The chancel has nine compartments, of which five occupy the 
 semicircidar apse. The window arches are rather low. The plates which illustrate 
 Lanville are pi. 29, an elevation of the West Front, and pi. 30, giving a group 
 
32 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 
 
 of capitals. There are also some additional details in plates 50 and 58. The 
 arrangement of the arches of the West Front differs from the usual type [not, 
 however, without some affinity in this respect with the fronts of Angouleme and of 
 Roulet] on account of the great scale of the arches of the second story, which are more 
 important than those of the ground story. It is reasonable to suppose that a very 
 effective composition in the gable must have been intended, but this, if ever executed, 
 has completely disappeared. The front is of the twelfth century. The details of this 
 church are good, and in excellent preservation. 
 
 S. Estephe — of which a general view is given in pi. 31 — has a 
 
 s. Estephe. barrel- vaulted nave of two bays, a central dome, elliptical on plan, 
 
 carried on pointed arches and squinches, and a groined choir. The 
 
 exterior is very plain, except the tower, which has two stories with trefoiled-headed 
 
 arches and the usual conical spire, in this case hardly earlier than the beginning of the 
 
 thirteenth century. 
 
 The church of Gensac is a very interesting one, and although it was 
 Gensac. much injured during the religious wars, great pains were taken in 
 restoring and maintaining it. The dates of these restorations are given 
 by M. Verneilh as extending from 1724 to 1740. Plate 8 gives a longitudinal section 
 of this church, pi. 32 the West Front, and pi. 33 the general view of the interior looking 
 westwards. To these is added, in pi. 34, a portion of the interior reduced from a care- 
 ful camera lucida drawing made by Mr. Sharpe with the object of showing more 
 particularly the joints of the stonework. The gable of the West Front exhibits a large 
 cross crossleied, raised in relief upon the face of the wall, and there are some curious 
 sculptures over the side arches which are represented in pi. 35. The central doorway 
 has three square orders, and the side arches two. The hood mouldings are ornamented 
 with the peculiar dog-tooth of the district, which has six rays instead of the four with 
 which we are so familiar. The interior of the nave is very fine and chastely simple. 
 There are four bays with domes and pendentives, no transept, but the easternmost bay 
 is covered with a tower. A fine base moulding runs all along the north, south, and 
 west walls. The choir is of much later architecture, and is wider than the nave. 
 In the nave there is the germ of a triforium. Each bay has double semicircular wall 
 arches, similar in this respect to Mouthiers. Above these arches is an ample cornice 
 supported by six plain but well-shaped corbels. Above this cornice is a tall semi- 
 circular-headed clerestory window, originally shafted. The projecting cornice referred 
 to answers the purpose of a triforium gallery, and communication is made from one 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 38 
 
 bay to another by means of a passage in the thickness of the wall behind each of 
 the transverse arches, entered by square-headed openings from each bay near the level 
 of the capitals. This cornice and communication is continued across the west end, 
 the access from north to south being given by similar openings behind the western- 
 most piers. 
 
 In pi. 7 is given the section through the central dome, and in 
 s. Amand de Boixe. plates 35 to 41 certain details, and in pi. 54 one of the capitals of 
 the very noble church of S. Amand de Boixe, the gem of the 
 whole expedition, both on account of its ample size, the extreme beauty of the 
 proportions and of the ornamental parts, and its thoroughly genuine character. 
 The date of the dedication, according to M. Verneilh, is 1170, and the style of 
 the nave and transepts is that of the Romano-Byzantine architecture of Angoumois, 
 but the arches are much more lofty than any other example we met with. The 
 nave, which is reached after entering through the west door by descending a broad 
 flight of a great number of steps (a feature found in other churches of the dis- 
 trict) has five bays and a half. It is of considerable height, and covered with a 
 pointed barrel vault. The aisles are very narrow, and nearly as high as the nave, 
 imparting to the whole the impression of being very lofty. 
 
 The most remarkable internal feature is the cupola (see pi. 36), supported on lofty 
 arches and two square orders ; the sub-arches having circular shafts, the others square 
 pilasters. In most of the domes, derived from Perigueux, the cornice band which 
 terminates the pendentives and starts the dome rests upon the extrados of the arches 
 of the crossing. Here, however, the pendentives are carried up about three courses 
 unbroken. Then there is a drum with a continuous arcade all round of twelve arches, 
 which are pierced for windows, and if the tower, as its architecture seems to warrant, 
 was coeval with the dome, the light must have been received second-hand through the 
 large and open belfry windows. The dome itself, though circular on plan, has six ribs. 
 The transepts were of great length ; both are ruinous, the south particularly so. The 
 northern had two chapels with apsidal ends. Traces of the original choir remain, 
 enough to show that it had one straight bay and a semicircular apse. The present 
 choir of three bays with quadripartite vaulting is later. 
 
 There is a crypt under a south-eastern chapel, which retains some curious and 
 well-preserved paintings. of the fourteenth century. 
 
 The chapiteaux histories (both inside the church and without) are most curiously 
 
34 DESCRIPTION OP THE PLATES. 
 
 and gracefully carved. The external architecture is not less remarkable than 
 that of the interior. The ground story of the West Front has the usual tripartite 
 arrangement. The central doorway is large and well ornamented, having five orders. 
 The left-hand side arch has the founder's tomb, which seems, however, to have been 
 inserted after the arch and wall were built. The second story departs a good deal 
 from the Angouleme type. 
 
 The most remarkable feature of the exterior is found on the west wall of the 
 north transept. Here are found the three sculptured arches illustrated by the plates 
 37 to 39. The impost frieze is also returned along the north wall of the nave. 
 These arches resemble much the arches of the ground story of the West Front of 
 Angouleme Cathedral, but have — or had at the time of our visit — the advantage of 
 being thoroughly genuine. Three figures — in two of the arches — occupy the 
 central field or tympanum of the arch, and the sculptures which enclose them above 
 and below seem to represent scenes from battle or the chase — carved with great 
 delicacy and spirit; some only moderately idealised, others purely fantastic, but all 
 very artistic. The foliage ornament is invariably well composed and cut. 
 
 The abbey was Benedictine, and is in ruins, but there are considerable remains 
 converted into dwellings on the south side of the church, particularly the ancient 
 refectory and two barrel-vaulted cellars of great length, and an entrance archway 
 dating from the twelfth century ; part also of the cloister remains. 
 
 Mr. Sharpe has left the following interesting notes of his visit to S. Amand de 
 Boixein 1873:— 
 
 "So much as is left of the eastern part of this grand conventual church of the first 
 class, that is to say, the crossing, the central tower and the east apsidal chapels of 
 the transept are of the rich type seen everywhere in this district, whether it be called 
 Romanesque or Transitional. What remains is still very grand, and has the advantage 
 of not having been restored ; it is, therefore, one of the few really historical monuments 
 left in the country. The plan originally comprised a nave with side aisles, having 
 imperceptibly pointed pier, arches and barrel vaults of similar shape to both, together 
 with the crossing arches carrying the pendentive base of a cupola ; but there this work 
 stops, leaving a great open circular aperture marked by the cornice. Some feet back 
 from the cornice is a circular wall arcaded in semicircular openings, carrying an upper 
 cornice from which the cupola springs. The cupola has six converging vaulting ribs, 
 on its surface, which terminate in the circular opening which was left as usual for the 
 bells ; but this cupola is of later work. A square tower encloses all this arrangement, 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 35 
 
 which is therefore not visible externally. The four crossing arches are not all of the 
 same height or span ; rather more space is left between the summits of the east and 
 west arches and the cornice than at the north and south. They all spring from the 
 level of the nave barrel vault, which, being continued, forms the abacus of these 
 capitals. The curve of the pendentive commences at the back of the voussoirs, and not, 
 as at Angouleme Cathedral, from the arris of the voussoirs, where all these arch stones 
 are dressed with a splay and curved to meet the pendentive. As the first cupola is 
 carried by the crossing arches, and therefore much above the barrel vault of the 
 nave, the apparent height of the whole arrangement, with the second cupola, is very 
 considerable and striking. The cupola and its ribs appear to be Gothic, the vaulting 
 ribs being very saillant, and the cupola itself much surbaiss/2 above a semicircle. 
 
 " Apparently the first design was carried only up to the crossing, and as perhaps 
 funds were not forthcoming, and a certain delay probable, a solid wall seems to have 
 been built on each side where the first nave arch should be ; pierced by a tall narrow 
 arch below the springing of the crossing arches. The barrel vault had evidently been also 
 constructed over this portion : for the difference in the masonry of the vault is apparent, 
 and the respond pier with its floreated capital is also on the west side of this solid masonry. 
 The capitals of this column, and those of the pierced arch referred to, all correspond 
 with the rich work of the eastern part, and resemble those of Angouleme Cathedral. 
 The crossing being thus sufficiently balanced towards the west, the work may have 
 thus remained for some time. 
 
 " The five arches of the nave show Transitional forms in the capitals of their piers, 
 some of them resemble exactly those of La Macarine [that is, bell-shaped and plain, 
 with the angles of the abacus broached into the bell]. The bases, however, appear 
 throughout the whole church to be similar, and the lower parts may have been laid in 
 from the first. All the capitals of the nave have this Transitional character, but the 
 impost is different and peculiar. 
 
 " The nave has a very grand, sombre effect. The side aisles are very lofty : as 
 lofty as those of Valence, which they much resemble. The nave capitals remind 
 one of those of Fontenay (1139), and Pontigny. The aisles have shallow semicircular 
 wall arches. The windows are small and narrow, and deeply recessed with little splay. 
 They have nook shafts with hollow-necked plain capitals. You descend from the west 
 door (which is quite on a level with, the ground outside at the West Front, and where 
 the bases are exposed) into the nave by a flight of thirteen steps. Externally the 
 
36 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 
 
 West Front contains two stories and a low gable. It is divided vertically into three 
 portions. The central portion contains a fine semicircular doorway of five orders, and the 
 two side divisions have one arch each ; that of the north containing what is no doubt 
 the founder's tomb, with a large space above it which was occupied no doubt by his 
 equestrian statue. This arch is for this reason probably wider and deeper than that on 
 the south side. The second story has in the centre a triple arcade of which the central 
 arch is larger than the others, and contains a window. The five orders of the doorway 
 are all covered with sunk patterns, somewhat like but very inferior to the 
 mechanical designs of English Transitional doorways; they evidently belong to the 
 same school and the same epoch. Several of the shafts are wanting, but the carved 
 work which remains is similar in character to that of the crossing and the north 
 transept. 
 
 " On the west side of the north transept is a series of carved work of the greatest 
 interest : it occurs in an arcade close to the ground on the west wall of the transept, 
 and consists of a frieze or broad impost of figures and foliage, which is continued 
 horizontally across three arches, of which the southernmost next the north aisle was 
 apparently a doorway, and round the corner along the aisle wall up to the first pilaster 
 buttress. This band is of the depth of the shaft capitals of these arches, and their 
 capitals form in fact part of it. It contains a remarkable series of carved work of very 
 excellent character and execution, considering the period to which it belongs. There is 
 the usual mixture of allegorical animals, men, birds, and foliage. The figures of men 
 are in all kinds of attitudes, some of which are both grand and expressive : they are 
 generally in contest with the animals, some of which have the usual serpents' tails, 
 and birds' heads. That part of the band, however, which is on the aisle wall represents 
 the chase, in which horses, men with bows, stags, and greyhounds are represented. 
 (There is said to be a similar chase in Angouleme Cathedral.*) All this work is in deep 
 relief, and very well conceived. The attitudes of some of the figures are quite classical, 
 and remind one of a classical frieze, others are grotesque : they are all in strong action. 
 The three arches have a similar band of foliage and figures on their first order. 
 
 "The tympanums of the two first arches reckoning from the north have three 
 figures each, those of the northernmost being our Saviour attended by two Apostles, 
 and those in the southernmost of the two S. Peter and two others, all with nimbi. 
 S. Peter holds the key in his right hand, and his name is inscribed on the stone on the 
 
 * This is so, namely, in the arcades of the ground story of the West Front, illustrated in plate 41 ; but it is not 
 in so genuine a state as this at S. Amand de Boixe. 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 37 
 
 right side of his head. Above this range are three arches, containing each a figure. 
 The choir has a six-light east window, and four-light side windows of good geometrical 
 roll tracery. 
 
 "This work is of a very interesting and valuable character, and it is to be hoped it 
 may never be restored, and its historical value destroyed, as has happened to the whole of 
 the work in Angouleme Cathedral." 
 
 The fine apteral cross church at Chatres, near Cognac, with four 
 Byzantine domes and a choir of later architecture, formerly Cistercian, 
 Chatres. j^ now deseeded, was naturally an object of peculiar interest to Mr. 
 Sharpe, and indeed to the whole party. The framework of the church, which has been 
 turned into a barn, remains almost entire, but the south transept is ruined, and the 
 tower, if there ever was one, is gone. The east end has a square Gothic termination, 
 with quadripartite vaulting. It is a fine example of plain Transitional work. The 
 interior is particularly simple. There are no wall arches, and the capitals are quite 
 plain. The windows are small, and the church must have been rather dark. The 
 West Front is rich and the carvings are good, its ornaments however are all 
 floral, and there are no figures of any kind. M. Verneilh, whilst praising in general 
 the beauty of this front, finds fault with one feature, namely, the use of round and 
 pointed arches in the same arcade. The plan is given on plate 2, and a section in 
 plate 4, the elevation of the West Front in plate 42, and various details in plates 44, 
 45, and 58. In the West Front it will be observed that although the subdivision into 
 three is preserved, in the ground story the side arches have become mere appendages, 
 and there is no vertical division of the front. The architecture of this example is one 
 of the latest specimens of the style, dating very nearly 1200, if not even somewhat 
 later, and it is worth noticing that the constructive requirements of the style were by 
 this time well understood, and the proper thickness given to the walls, which, notwith- 
 standing the neglect of many years, still stand securely. In the interior, the joints of 
 the voussoirs are not curved as they are at Mouthiers and generally elsewhere, but are 
 combined with the pendentives by merely splaying them. There are very few remains 
 of the conventual buildings connected with the church. 
 
 There are four churches at distances not far removed from each other, namely, 
 Chalais, Aubeterre, Montmoreau, and Coudeon, all of the same Transitional period, in 
 which the west doorways have a striking resemblance to one another, and are all 
 of remarkable beauty, the finest being Chalais, which is carefully represented in plate 
 47, further details being shown in plates 45 and 54. 
 
38 DESCRIPTION OP THE PLATES. 
 
 A view of the West front of Chalais is given in plate 46. This Front 
 Chaiais. retains only the ground story and the commencement of the second, but 
 it is partly explained by that of Aubeterre, which greatly resembles it, 
 and which has not been quite so much ruined. At Chalais the traces of the arcades 
 of the second story are only just visible. The central compartment had six small 
 arches, the sides four each. In considering the details of the doorway, comparison 
 should be made with those of Aubeterre and Montmoreau in plates 48 and 49. 
 Notwithstanding their similarity there are some features in favour of this example, 
 as compared with Aubeterre, arising from the greater delicacy of the soffits of each of 
 the orders on the one hand, and on the other from the undesirable repetition at 
 Aubeterre of the lozenge in the second and third orders of the doorway. The plate 
 49, which gives the arches at Aubeterre and Montmoreau, in juxtaposition, seems 
 sufficient to assign, a fortiori, the superiority of Chalais to all the others. The work 
 at Montmoreau has been restored, but not so as to obliterate all the old work. The 
 carvings at Aubeterre and Chalais have not been touched, but they are somewhat more 
 weathered at Chalais * than at Aubeterre. 
 
 The north and south arches have one order each, beautifully carved, in each case 
 the tympanum is tilled with sculpture. On the left hand are three good but mutilated 
 sitting figures ; the right-hand arch has a fine group which seems to represent a half- 
 opened tomb with female mourners outside, indicating, Mr. Sharpe thought, the death 
 of the founder before his work was finished. At any rate, the existing church is very 
 mean, and there are no signs of any solid or important architecture having been built 
 or prepared for in the church to which this design forms the entrance, and it is 
 possible that it never was built. The front alone was the founder's memorial. 
 These sculptures are given in plate 43. The dimensions of this front are sufficient for 
 fine effect, the situation is commanding, and if it ever was complete it must have been 
 one of the noblest ornaments of the Province. 
 
 Very much the same description — excepting that the situation does 
 
 Aubeterre. not display the front so well — applies to the twin church of Aubeterre, 
 
 not more than seven miles distant. A view of the West Front is given 
 
 in plate 48, and details of the doorway in plates 49 and 50. The details of the 
 
 * On our arrival at Chnlais, the capitals of the central doorway appeared to be quite plain, merely boasted into 
 6hape, but unsculptured. Mr. Sharpe, however, suspected from their shape that they could not really be so, and on 
 examining them minutely, found theui coated with plaster, which had a weather-stained surface exactly like stone. 
 He borrowed a mason's hammer, and with his own hands, regardless of the broiling sun, to the admiration both of hie 
 followers and of the Cure, removed the plaster coating and recovered the chapiteaux histories. 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 39 
 
 ornament have been already discussed. The side arches of the ground story have 
 each three orders, but no figures in the tympanum. The northern arch, however, has 
 a continuous carved impost. 
 
 In the northern division of the third story are the remains of an equestrian 
 figure the intention of which has already been discussed in chap, i., and must again 
 occupy our attention in the description of Chateauneuf. Here nothing remains but 
 part of the horse and the saddle, too much dilapidated to form any distinct opinion of 
 its excellence as a work of art. Some further details of the ornament are given in 
 pi. 41. 
 
 Of this Front has been preserved a note made by Mr. Sharpe on the occasion of 
 his visit in preparation for the Excursion, and is dated May, 1875, at which time, it 
 may be observed, he had not seen Chalais : " West Front of this church only left. The 
 whole is magnificent. One hardly knows which feeling most predominates, admiration 
 at the delicacy and wonderful minuteness and character of some of the ornamental 
 details and satisfaction at their wonderful state of preservation, or indignation at the 
 mutilation by violence and neglect to which it has been subjected, and regret at the 
 large amount of ornamental detail which is lost. 
 
 " Two stories only are left, and a fragment of the third. Of these, the form only 
 of the second remains. Of the ground storjr, which consists, as usual, of three large 
 arches, sufficient is left to give a complete idea of the original design. The central 
 arch (doorway) is on a grand scale, and carries a large quantity of very remarkable 
 ornament. It has six orders, including the foliated order (replacing the tympanum) of 
 the soffit. This ornamentation is chiefly of the mechanical character {giomStrique) of 
 the Transitional period, and as a parallel example is well worth contrasting with the 
 similar and almost contemporaneous doorway of Selby Abbey (W. doorway), also of six 
 orders [I am not sure that the mechanical ornamentation of Selby is not decidedly 
 superior in effect to that of Aubeterre, but the carved work at Aubeterre is very 
 superior]. We have amongst this work many of the same features met with elsewhere 
 in Charente, with lozenge, star and flat eight-lobed dog-tooth and saw-tooth, both large 
 and small." 
 
 The picturesque, but much altered and dilapidated, West Front of 
 
 Berneuii. Berneuil is shown on pi. 51, and a section is given in pi. 5. The 
 
 interior contains much of the original, and has a nave of four bays, with 
 
 pointed barrel vault, a central dome, with pendentives and north and south transepts 
 
40 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 
 
 with eastern chapels, and a choir of one bay with a good apse. The choir is tall, and has 
 a fine external effect. The windows have the four-lobed dog-tooth on their hoodmoulds. 
 The medallions between the corbels of the cornice have both heads and figures. The 
 capitals are all plain, and those of the principal internal arches have their sides sloped, 
 and not hollowed. The entire church is Transitional except the Gothic additions at 
 the west end. The West Front and the north side of the nave have been reinforced 
 by enormous buttresses, probably of the fourteenth century. The situation is 
 extremely good. 
 
 The church of Chateauneuf, of Transitional architecture, has been 
 Chateauneuf. restored, which has much affected the interior. It should be remarked 
 that this church alone, among those of the Romano- Byzantine type 
 which we visited, has side aisles, and the arches are more sharply pointed than usual. 
 There is a descent (part of the original construction) of seven steps from the west 
 front into the nave. The chief interest is, however, centred in the fine West Front. 
 A portion of the ornamentation is given in pi. 52. The ground story has the usual 
 triple arrangement. The central doorway of three orders and the side arches of one 
 have their capitals, imposts, and archivolts covered with carved men, animals, and 
 foliage intertwined, not unlike the work at S. Amand de Boixe, but not quite so pure. 
 The vertical divisions are made by pilasters in the ground story and coupled shafts 
 above. The horizontal division is made by a cornice moulding supported by corbels 
 remarkable for their execution and power of expression, between which are on the wall 
 carved pateras of fourteen leaves with roses in the middle. Above this corbel table the 
 middle compartment of the second story has a window, and the side compartments 
 have large recessed arches, that towards the north being the widest and deepest, and 
 under this is placed the very remarkable equestrian statue referred to in chap. i. 
 The horse, as might be supposed, looks towards the centre of the front. In front, 
 beneath, are the remains of a prostrate figure, and near the horse's head is a female. 
 According to the view of the Abbe Michon, and accepted by Mr. Sharpe, the equestrian 
 figure is the founder of the church, the female is his wife, and the prostrate figure is 
 a serf. Both the rider and the horse have suffered mutilation, but enough remains to 
 show that, considering the period, the group is a masterpiece of sculpture. The pose 
 of the horse and the rider, which are life size, and the shape of his flowing mantle, 
 treated as a relief upon the wall at the back, show that this figure was a real work of 
 genius, and has much affinity with the Greek sculptures, especially of the earlier period. 
 A representation of this figure is given in pi. 43. There still exist at Civray, in the 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 41 
 
 northern part of Angoumois, and as we have already seen at Aubeterre, remains of 
 similar equestrian figures. There is also one with modifications at Ruffee, but this of 
 Chateauneuf appears to be the finest. 
 
 The southern recess has two figures of saints on pedestals placed upon the corbel 
 table, and there are two other corresponding figures ranging with them in the 
 middle part of the second story. These figures have not been touched, and although 
 of the decorative carved work a good deal has been restored, yet much of the old 
 remains. The side aisles express themselves on the front by means of their sloping 
 roofs, which do not quite reach to the springing of the central gable, which is distinct, 
 and bears upon it in relief a lofty, slightly pointed arch springing from the shafts which 
 divide the facade vertieallv. 
 
 PI. 2 gives the plan, and pi. 53 represents six capitals from the 
 Fieac. Church of Fleac. Of this church Mr. Petit writes : — 
 
 " Fl^ac, near Angouleme, is an example of this (the Romano-Byzantine) 
 construction, applied to a small and very simple village church. The nave is roofed 
 by"two domes, slightly pointed, resting on Byzantine pendentives, and separated by a 
 round arch with a not very wide archivolt. The longitudinal arches in the wall are 
 also round, but those under the tower are pointed; and the tower, which stands between 
 the nave and chancel, is vaulted, so that dome and pendentive belong to one sphere.* 
 The chancel is apsidal with semi-domical vault. The tower is square, and there are no 
 transepts." Fleac is much praised also by the Abbe Michon, who also calls it one of 
 the earliest of the cupola churches. 
 
 The West Front has a triple arcade on the ground story, with good floreated 
 capitals and plain work above. M. Verneilh assigns it to the very beginning of the 
 twelfth century, and calls attention to the difference between the cupolas of the nave, 
 which follow the more usual form, and the lower one under the tower, as described 
 above. There is great variety in the chopiteanx historih of the west doors. 
 
 One of the plans on plate 2 is that of Puyperoux, and the section is 
 
 Puyperoux.. given in plate 8. The entire church is early Romanesque, and the 
 
 arches are all semicircular. The oldest part is the Eastern Apse which 
 
 is of unusual form considering the date, and is very handsome, with seven semicircular 
 
 * It should he borne in mind that this observalion refers only to the dome under the tower. — " Architecturnl 
 Studies in Fra7ire" page 70. 
 
i- DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 
 
 apses cuspiug round the principal one. These subordinate apses are very irregular 
 and simple, the connecting wall arch openings, which are carried upon shafts, have 
 only one order. The apse has no cornice or entablature externally, and the small 
 narrow windows of each chapel have their semicircular heads cut out of one stone. 
 
 The massive piers of the crossing are grouped in a very effective manner, and 
 their capitals, as indeed those of the apse also, are carved in a very primitive 
 manner, with figures of men and beasts in considerable relief with little or no foliage 
 combined with them, struggling, intertwining, and devouring, with an enormous over- 
 hanging abacus. These carvings have a great deal of character, and are much praised 
 by the Abbe Michon. The piers have rude double torus bases on a circular plinth. 
 There is no Byzantine feature. For one course above the arches of the crossing the 
 wall is entirely square, then comes a shallow moulding from which spring squinches 
 which cut off the corners and form an eight-sided figure, but leave the cardinal sides 
 much the longest : on this an irregular dome is formed, which becomes more nearly 
 spherical as it rises and finishes in a four-foot circular opening. The isolation of the 
 piers of the crossing has been already referred to in the description of Mouthiers, a 
 church subsequent to this in date. The nave of Puyperoux is in ruins, being one 
 example among many of the destruction wrought by the unbalanced weight of the 
 barrel vaulting, notwithstanding that here the height was moderate, and the walls 
 thick. The nave has north and south doors in its western bay in addition to the 
 principal entrance. The West Front exhibits the triple arrangement in the ground 
 story, and the rest is too much ruined to be properly described. The church, 
 especially the interior, is of an extremely solemn and grave character, massive and 
 comparatively low, standing by itself in a fine situation. It is now the chapel of a 
 nunnerv. 
 
 S. Quentin de 
 Chalais. 
 
 The Church of S. Quentin de Chalais, situate between Chalais and 
 Aubeterre, is represented on plan in plate 2, and in section in plate 6. 
 The Nave at present has aisles, but as these were added in the fourteenth 
 century they have been omitted, as sufficient evidence remained of the original side 
 walls and windows. The piers and arches of the crossing encroach much upon the 
 width of the church. The pavement is laid out of level, rising considerably towards 
 the east. The apse is a fine one, and the sculpture of the capitals of its columns 
 seemed to suggest scriptural histories, but not clearly so, and served to draw 
 attention to the remarkable absence of such subjects in the carving of the district 
 generally. This church is of the later Transitional period. The wall arches of the 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 43 
 
 nave are semicircular, the transverse pointed. There are four bays besides the 
 crossing, with a cupola and central tower, winch has been destroyed. The nave ha? 
 a cornice of considerable projection, carried on corbels of a concave contour without 
 carving. 
 
 This church, like many others around it, has been used as a fortification, and 
 has over its entire length a loopholed upper story of the sixteenth century. 
 
 The Tower at Blanzac is a remarkable feature from top to bottom. 
 Bianzac. The original early Transitional church was rebuilt in the style 
 of the later Transition on a more extended plan, but the old 
 central tower was so much valued that it was left standing in the centre, 
 with its external supports and internal arches completely inclosed within the 
 walls of the wider and loftier church, which it touches only where the newer roof 
 abuts against it. Above the arches of the original crossing is a square open 
 compartment, with windows which opened into the original roofs of the four arms of 
 the cross. Then comes a corbelled cornic*e, above which squinches reduce the square 
 into an octagon, and upon this springs a dome. All is very lofty, and the foliage 
 worked upon the rather large cajfitals of the shafts of the principal arches, and upon 
 the cornices of the tower, is extremely fine. The old tower again reappears above 
 the roof of the newer church, and still forms the best external feature of the whole 
 composition. 
 
 The church of Rouillac is shown in plan on plate 2, and the 
 Rouiiiac. section of the nave with an elevation of the tower on plate 7, the 
 dome and tower in plate 17, and some details in plate 57. 
 
 The nave and transept of this church, with three bays barrel- vaulted, must in all 
 probability have followed the fate of the nave of Puyperoux, but for the enormous 
 buttresses subsequently added. Both transepts have fine apsidal chapels towards the 
 east and the grouping of these with the central one of the chancel is very pic- 
 turesque. There is a central dome with pendentives, surmounted by an octagonal 
 tower apparently of late 12th century work. 
 
 Plate 59 gives the West Front of the church of Champagne en 
 Champagne en Blanzac, which is a small but extremely good example of early 
 
 Blanzac. 
 
 Transitional work. The front consists of two arcaded stories, 
 both showing the tripartite arrangement, and they finish in a fine corbel 
 
44 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 
 
 course below the gable. The arches are bold, and their shafts have the capitals 
 histories. In this church all the arches of construction are pointed, and those 
 of decoration semicircular. The church has been partially restored, es2>ccially 
 from the tower westwards. The original roof of the nave, which was a pointed 
 barrel-vault, is gone. The crossing has a dome carried on pendentives, and the 
 chancel, which consists of one bay and the apse, has a semicircular, or almost semi- 
 circular, barrel vault. The east end has shafts both externally and internally which 
 reach from the ground to the cornice. Externally, the arcades between these shafts 
 are very tall and effective ; the internal and external compartments do not, however, 
 correspond with each other. 
 
 riate 2 contains a plan of the polygonal chapel or church of 
 s. Michael g Michel d'Entraigues near Angouleme, and the details of one of the 
 
 d'Entraigues. 
 
 capitals is in plate 55. The church has been rebuilt, but a few of the 
 old capitals have been re-introduced. The semi-circular wall arches, which display 
 the apsidal chapels, carry an octagonal clerestory wall, pierced with narrow windows. 
 In the angles of the octagon a second stage of shafts of reduced diameter carry 
 pointed wall arches, and the eight vaulting ribs which terminate in a ring of small 
 diameter. The date assigned by the Abbe Michon to this church is 1 1 37. 
 
 Montmoreau Church, of which the doorway is the principal subject 
 
 Montmoreau. of P late 49 > ° ne ° f the ca P itals bein S 8' ivcn m P late 54 > is a 
 
 fine structure, but has been restored, and only a short time was 
 therefore allowed for its examination. The nave has a barrel-vault, the crossing a 
 cupola with central tower above, and there is a fine belfry story arcaded with four 
 semicircular headed and shafted windows between attached shafts running up to 
 the cornice. The transepts have eastern chapels, and there is a good apse. The 
 West Front has two stories below the gable ; the lower one somewhat similar to those 
 of Chalais and Aubeterre, but the second consists of five tall arcades only, of which 
 three occupy the central division of the front. The details of its noble doorway 
 have been already discussed in the description of Chalais. 
 
 In plate 54 is an engraving of the tympanum of an arch at Licheres, 
 ,. L - a church intended to have been visited on the last day but one, but 
 
 Licheres. 
 
 which it was found necessary to omit. The engraving and description 
 are taken from some notes by Mr. Sharpe when he went to "spy out the land " 
 previous to the Excursion, which fortunately have been preserved. 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 15 
 
 " The entire church is Romanesque, and a very noble example. The original 
 semicircular or imperceptibly pointed barrel-vault of the nave has fallen, but has 
 left traces on the central tower. The aisles are very narrow, only 4-ft. 10-in. from 
 column to wall. The nave has five compartments and the arches are all semicircular. 
 The pendentives only of the cupola over the crossing remain up to the string, which 
 has the dogtooth moulding. The apse is fine, and is arcaded inside and out. There 
 is a communication between chancel and transept, similar to Mouthiers, having also 
 as there a stone altar at the end of the passage. The west front retains only the 
 doorway and the side arches, but these are very grand, and are crowded with foliage 
 and figures of the richest work, delicate and in excellent taste." 
 
 To these observations it may be added that the vaults of the aisles are highly 
 stilted, and that the columns are more slender than is usual in this style, being 
 25 inches in diameter, whilst, including caps and bases, they are 18 feet high. The 
 composition of the tympanum of the doorway, which is the subject of pi. 54, is 
 remarkable on account of the segmental opening pierced through the semicircular 
 tympanum, and the ornamental treatment which follows from these shapes. 
 
 The church at Nersac, of the early Transition, is one of great 
 
 Nersac simplicity. It exhibits no Byzantine features. The flat double pilaster 
 
 buttresses, of which one is given in plate 44, are curious, as is the 
 
 semicircular headed western doorway with three plain orders. The jambs are 
 
 beaded rather than shafted, and have continuous foliage pattern instead of the usual 
 
 capital. Another capital is shown on plate 55. 
 
 Linars, of which some details are given in plate 56, is a disused 
 Linars. church. It appears to have nothing about it worthy of remark 
 excepting the west front, which is very elegant and of Transitional 
 architecture with two stories and a gable. The front is divided into three parts 
 vertically by stout shafts, with foliage capitals. The ground story has three arches 
 with plain square orders, having their hoodmoulds adorned with four lobed dog-tooth, 
 a treatment which prevails over the whole front. Above the cornice of the ground 
 story is a space of about three feet wide of plain masonry, and then the continuous 
 sill of the arcade of the second story. This arcade is very elegant, three arches 
 occupying the central and two each of the side divisions of the front. The shafts 
 which form these divisions terminate with a fine corbelled cornice, the moulding of 
 which forms the abacus of the shaft and breaks round it ; above are short truncated 
 
46 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 
 
 pyramids, resting on these capitals and finishing with the heads of beasts. In the 
 gable is a straight-sided gabled canopy which formerly protected a statue. 
 
 In plate 57 is given a capital from the Church of Gourville. 
 
 Gouniiic. There was little else of interest in this church, but it was one of the 
 
 instances where the Romanesque vaulting, whether barrel or domical — 
 
 apjjarently the latter — had nearly ruined the walls of the structure, which, however, 
 
 were still standing, leaning painfully outwards, and covered with a flat timbered roof 
 
 and a ceiling. 
 
 "&■ 
 
 In plate 58 is represented one of the capitals of the now desecrated 
 s. Fhrent. Clmrc h f g_ Florent de La Rochefoucauld. Mr. Sharpe has left a more 
 
 La Rochefoucauld. L 
 
 than usually detailed note respecting this church. 
 
 "The nave only is left, with north and south aisle and west doorway. The 
 former is Early Romanesque ; the doorway less distinctly so. A very interesting 
 fragment on account of its fixed date. The Abbe Michon says that the cartulary of 
 S. Amand speaks of its having been built between 1040 and 1060, but the wife of the 
 proprietor tells me that they have the charter of foundation which is dated 1060. 
 The plan is that of most early Romanesque churches ; nave with a barrel 
 vault, aisles with quadripartite vaults, both semicircular. The scale is large 
 and stately ; large piers, square with attached shafts in the centre of each face 
 with plain capitals sloped off from the square to the circle without any orna- 
 ment, large heavy imposts, plain chamfer and fillet ; tolerably large windows on 
 both sides, deep but not very broad splay, glass not close to the outer sur- 
 lace of the wall. The West Front has a single door of one order of a single plain 
 roll resting on capitals, having early Romanesque foliage and shafts, which appear to 
 be made up of pieces taken from several shafts : grooved in straight, spiral, or zigzag 
 lines. The barrel vault is well built and fairly preserved. We have of course only 
 the latest part of the work ; it would be interesting to know what the eastern part 
 was like. 
 
 "The West Front is very simple, with only a single window high up. There are 
 semicircular headed aisle windows on south side, and flat pilaster buttresses and two 
 oculi, one on each side of west window, which together light this end. There is the 
 weather mould of a projecting porch on this front, but I doubt its originality, 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 47 
 
 though the simplicity of the western doorway gives it the appearance of being an 
 inner and not an outer doorway. The pediment is double, there being two lines of 
 cornice with corbels, one over the other. The corbels of aisle cornice and West 
 Front are very like those of all other Romanesque churches, varied heads of men and 
 animals, but very pronounced." 
 
 There is little to add to the above. The front has a low gable, and the corbels 
 on the north side are in excellent preservation. 
 
 The church of S. Liguaire de Cognac has been much altered, but 
 Cognac. b th in its date and its size it is an almost exact parallel of the 
 Cathedral of Angouleme. M. Verneilh finds its proportions a little the 
 lighter and more elegant of the two. The choir has been destroyed, and the evidence 
 of the cupolas of the nave, which is now covered by a quadripartite vault, is not 
 found without examination. The great doorway of the west front, however, 
 remained sufficiently perfect to enable us to judge of its pristine beauty. The 
 archivolt of the outer of its four orders, instead of the usual intertwined monsters, 
 exhibits the signs of the Zodiac, accompanied by the labours incident to each month. 
 
 Plate 58 represents a portion of this doorway, of which the carvings were not 
 inferior to any in the district for their beauty of composition or the freedom and 
 delicacy of their execution. The usual composition of three arches in the ground 
 story prevails here. The central arch is semicircular, but the side arches are 
 pointed, and in their ornaments and sculptures somewhat resemble those at Chalais. 
 
 One capital from Bassac, of which church some mention has already 
 
 Bassac,Mor.tbron,6c.\ ieen made in chap, ii., is given in pi. 54, and additional illustrations 
 
 have been drawn from four places, which did not form part of the 
 
 proposed excursion, namely, Montbron, near La Rochefoucauld ; Rioux Martin, near 
 
 Chalais ; and Garat and Dirac, near Angouleme. 
 
 Montbron and Rioux Martin supply two of the illustrations of the interiors of 
 the cupolas given in pi. 17. Montbron is interesting also for its monuments, and 
 Rioux Martin for its remarkable spire. 
 
48 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. 
 
 A specimen of eight-lobed dog-tooth is given from Garat in pi. 45, and one of 
 the capitals from Dirac in pi. 54. This church has also a good West Front of two 
 stories, with a remarkable doorway. 
 
 Plate 19 contains a capital from the Abbey of La Couronne, and in pi. 45 is a 
 detail from Plaizac : both these places are mentioned in chap. ii. 
 
 LIST OF THE MEMBERS OF THE EXCURSION PARTY. 
 W. Talbot Brown ; S. Flint Clarkson, Honorary Secretary ; Alfred Conder ; Thomas Garratt ; J, M. Gething ; 
 Wallace Gill; Edward G. Hayes, Honorary Secretary; William Ilenman ; Arthur Hill; C. Humphreys; John 
 Johnson; A. II. Kersey; G. H. Musgrove ; Spencer Nottingham.; Bowes A. Paice ; Francis Cranmer Penrose ; 
 John S. Quilter, President of the Architectural Association; E. Cookworthy Robins ; A. It. Scott; Edmund Sharpe, 
 the Leader of the Excursion Party ; R. Phene Spiers ; Emmanuel Tronquois ; Sydney Vacher ; W. A. Waddington ; 
 T. S. Watts ; C. Wellard ; George Wheelhouse ; W. J. Wood. 
 
 Printed by BUCK <£ WOOTTON. Westminster Bridge Road. 
 
Cathedral of Angouleme. 
 west front 
 
/"\ 
 
 LA PALUD 
 
 CELLEFROUIN 
 
 
 ♦ 4 
 
 ♦ 4 
 
 * 4 
 
 t 4 
 
 PUYPERCUX. 
 
 MOUTHIERS 
 
 kJ 
 
 LANVILLE 
 
 AU 
 
 t 4 
 
 * ♦ 
 
 ST. QUENTIN , , CH ALAIS 
 
 M 
 
 W 
 
 SI MICHEL tfETRAIGHES 
 
 
 c 
 
U i-il\irLiL: IN 1'iL . 
 
 PI. 3. 
 
 J AkermaD. Phuto-hth London 
 
 A. CELLEFROU1N. 
 
 b. St Amand de Boixe. 
 

 f^_ 
 
 Eh 
 
 % 
 w 
 
 < 
 
 o 
 
 > ^j{ P^f i -in- tT . ^ 
 
m 
 
 D 
 uJ 
 Z 
 
 or 
 
 UJ 
 
 CD 
 
 CO 
 
 a: 
 
 u/ 
 
 3 
 O 
 
to 
 
■^ab^ 
 
 -H-i-^ ' .-JH+ j l 
 
 < 
 
 D 
 O 
 
 £E Si 
 
 MS 
 
 LJ 
 >< 
 
 o 
 
 CO 
 UJ 
 
 Q 
 
 a 
 z 
 < 
 
 < 
 
 a 
 
 UJ 
 
 CC 
 
 < 
 
 id 
 5 
 
PI. 8. 
 
 GENSAC. 
 
 4- WESTERN BAYS. 
 
 BOURG CHARENTE. 
 
 BOURG CHARENTE. 
 
 PUYPEROUX . 
 
 SCALE Or FEET. 
 
 J Akermaii, Photo-hilt London. 
 
PI. 3. 
 
 Angouleme Cathedral. 
 
 PLAN. 
 
P1.10. 
 
 J Alserman, Photo-Inn London 
 
 Angouleme. 
 
 SECTION THROUGH NAVE, LOOKING LAST. 
 ON LINE. A. B. 
 
Fl.ll. 
 
 
 SCALE OF t 
 
 J Akeriuan. Photo -hih Londo 
 
 Angouleme. 
 
 SECTION THROUSH TOWER AND TRANSEPT. 
 
 ON LINE. CO. 
 
CHARE NTE. 
 
 Il "AjS» 
 
 PI. 12. 
 
 
 Akermao Photo -iitt London 
 
 Cellefrouin. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI .13. 
 
 
 J.-Akerman, Photo-Inn London 
 
 Cellefroui n. 
 
CHARE NTE 
 
 PI. 14. 
 
 
 J Aherman. Photo-Ink London 
 
 CE.LLEFROUIN. LANTERNE. DE.S MORTS. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI. 15. 
 
 
 fe^<~ 
 
 J AitermaiL. Photolith London 
 
 ROULET. WE.ST FRONT. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 P1.16. 
 
 ROU LET. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PL 17. 
 
 J Akerman, Photo-Inn London 
 
 A. MONTBRON. 
 
 b. Rioux Martin. 
 
 C. ROULE.T. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 P1.18. 
 
 MOUTHIERS. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI 20. 
 
 x~i 
 
 , ,- r 
 
 ' 
 
 SCALE Of t 
 
 SECTION THROUGH NAVE 
 LOOKING EAST. 
 
 Trois Palis. 
 
 SECTION THROUGH TOWER. 
 LOOKING NORTH. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI. 21. 
 
 J Akerman, Photo hth Londo 
 
 Trois Palis. 
 
CHARBNTE. 
 
 PL 22- 
 
 Aiermati.Pbotobtli Londoi 
 
 Trois Palis, west end. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 P1.23. 
 
 J Akerman.Photo-Utn London 
 
 a. St Quentin. 
 
 b. Trois Palis. 
 
 c. Roulet. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI. £4. 
 
 J Akermin. Hi otolith London 
 
 PLASSAC from S. E. 
 
CHARBNTE. 
 
 PI 25. 
 
 JAkennan,Fhoro-Lrtb London. 
 
 PLASSAC. east E.NI 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI. 26. 
 
 ^P^E. Alt t}i£ Capitals are carved,, but only these measure) I and. shewn en tlu: spot arc aiven. 
 
 La PALUD. west front. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI. 27. 
 
 JAlerman.Ehcrto-litlL London. 
 
 La Palud. east end. 
 
- i. j-v ivd n i jjj . 
 
 PL 28. 
 
 BOURG CHARE.NTE.. west front. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PL 29. 
 
 I .Akennan. Photo hth. London 
 
 LANVILLE. west front. 
 
t 
 
CHARBNTE. 
 
 PI. 30. 
 
 J AkermaD. Photo htLLoadon 
 
 Lanville. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI 31. 
 
 J Akerman.Pbotolith London 
 
 St Estephe. south side 
 
CHARE NTE 
 
 GeLNSAC. west-front. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI. 33. 
 
 J Akerman, Photo hth Loudon 
 
 Gensac. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI 34. 
 
 J Akerman Photo lith London 
 
 Gensac. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI 35. 
 
 J. Akerman, Photo -lit h London 
 
 a. St Amand de Boixe. 
 
 b. Gensac 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PL 36- 
 
 J Akernuui.Photo-lrOi London 
 
 SlAlVlAND DE BOIXE. central dome. 
 
UJ 
 
 X 
 
 o 
 
 CD 
 
 ul 
 Q 
 
 Q 
 
 Z 
 < 
 
 < 
 
 05 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PL 40. 
 
 
 J Akerman,Photo-litV London- 
 
 St Amand de Boixe . 
 
ID 
 
 K- 
 
 
 X 
 
 : M 
 
 5 
 
 ^h?^ 
 
 si 
 
 3 
 
 tJ 
 
 M 
 
 ^^rtfvj 
 
 *yr^ 
 
 fe^-r 
 
 
CHARBNTE. 
 
 PI 42 
 
 SCALE OF FEET 
 
 CHATRtS W. FRONT. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 F1.43. 
 
 J Akerman.Photo-luii London 
 
 a. Chalais. 
 
 b. Chateauneuf. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 P1.44. 
 
 N ERSAC . 
 
 PLASSAC. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI .45. 
 
 CELLEFROUIN. 
 
 PLAI2AC. 
 
 PLAIZAC. 
 
 SLAB LYIN6 A6AINST WALL OF CHURCH 
 — AT CELLEFROUIN 
 
 CHALAIS. 
 
 CHALAIS. 
 
 J Akerman, Photo-htt London 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PL 47. 
 
 
 CHALASS. CENTRAL DOORWAY. W. front. 
 

CHARENTE. 
 
 PI. 49. 
 
 J Akermao. Photo Uth LondoD 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI. 50 
 
 L A N V I LLE. 
 
 LANVILLE. 
 
 & ^ iiiMiHMMms m4mtmm*miil 
 
 Kggmrow 
 
 J Akerman.Photo-lith London 
 
/ 
 
 V 
 
 / 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PL 52. 
 
 CAPITAL. INTERIOR. 
 
 ARCH MOULD. 
 CENTRAL DOORWAY. W. FRONT. 
 
 fTT-"" I 
 
 IMPOST. MOULDINGS & CAPITALS. 
 CENTRAL DOORWAY. 
 
 Chateaunluf. 
 
< 
 
 < 
 
 I 
 (J 
 
 < 
 
 UJ 
 
 a: 
 o 
 
 2 
 (- 
 
 Z 
 
 o 
 
 S5 
 
 Pi 
 
 < 
 x 
 o 
 
 < 
 
 CO 
 CO 
 
 < 
 
 CO 
 
 < 
 
 - fee 
 
 bJ 
 X 
 
 o 
 
 CO 
 
 u 
 Q 
 
 a 
 z 
 < 
 
 < 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 P1.56. 
 
 A. 
 
 B. 
 
 J Akennan.Pnoto-litli London 
 
 a. La Pa lu d. 
 
 b. Li N a r s. 
 
CHARENTE. 
 
 PI. 57. 
 
 Alterman Photo In h London 
 
 A. ROUILLAC. 
 
 B. Cellefrouin . 
 
 C. GOURVILLE. 
 
% 
 
 a 
 < 
 o 
 
CHARE NTE. 
 
 PI 59. 
 
 J Akermac Photo ktn London 
 
 Champagne-Blanzac 
 
/y 
 
/2/U//CT/S 
 
Ufa 
 
 
-— —■■■i^pr i