PORTRAITS, PRINTS, AND WRITINGS OF JOHN MILTON MILTON TERCENTENARY THE PORTRAITS, PRINTS AND WRITINGS OF JOHN MILTON BY DR WILLIAMSON WITH AN APPENDIX AND INDEX BY MR C. SAYLE EXHIBITED AT CHRIST'S COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE 1908 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/portraitsprintswOOwill TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Note vi Preface vii Essay on the Portraits of John Milton i Catalogue of the Portraits of John Milton 27 ,, ,, Statuary work .......... 29 ,, ,, Miniatures 31 „ ,, Portraits 33 ,, „ Drawings 38 ,, ,, Engravings, Mezzotints, Etchings and Lithographs ... 39 Manuscripts 91 Essay on the early editions of Milton's Works 92 Extra note to page 2 121 Medallic Portraits '123 Appendix H5 Addenda to Appendix . 154 Index 161 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS John Milton, aged 21. From the Portrait at Nuneham .... Frontispiece Copy of the entry in the Admission Book, Christ's College .... v Page from John Milton's Bible in the British Museum, giving the entries made with his own hand relative to the birth of himself and various members of his family to face p. 1 John Milton, aged 10. By Cornells Janssen. In the possession of J. Passmore Edwards, Esq to face p. 3 John Milton at the age of 62. Engraving from life by William Faithorne, from Milton's History of Britain, 1670 to face p. 5 John Milton by Faithorne. From the original work in the possession of Sir Robert H. Hobart, K.C.V.O., M.P to face p. 7 John Milton, from the original portrait known as the Bayfordbury (or Tonson), drawing now in the possession of H. Clinton Baker, Esq to face p. 9 iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Portrait by Pieter van der Plas, in the National Portrait Gallery, considered to represent John Milton to face p. 19 Miniature by Samuel Cooper belonging to the Duke of Buccleuch and Queens- berry, said to represent John Milton as a young man . . . .to face p. 21 John Milton when about 48. The Woodcock portrait. In the collection of Dr Williamson to face p. 23 The clay bust of Milton said to be the work of Pierce, now preserved in the Library of Christ's College, Cambridge to face p. 29 Milton as a young man. The oil painting in the hall of Christ's College, Cambridge to face p. 34 Full size facsimile of the title-page of the first edition of Comus . . .to face p. 92 Title-page of the first collective edition of Milton's Minor Poems, with the very rare portrait by Marshall, 1645 to face p. 92 Full size facsimile of the title-page of the first collective edition of Milton's Minor Poems, 1645 P- 93 Full size facsimile of the title-page of the first binding of the first edition of Paradise Lost P- 94 Full size facsimile of the title-page of the second binding of the same . p. 95 Full size facsimile of the title-page of the third binding of the same . p. 96 Full size facsimile of the title-page of the fifth binding of the same . P- 97 The original agreement for the publication of Paradise Lost, in the British Museum jolding plate to face p. 99 Full size facsimile of the title-page of the seventh binding of the first edition of Paradise Lost ........... p. 100 Full size facsimile of the title-page of the eighth binding of the same . . p. 101 Full size facsimile of the title-page of the first edition of Paradise Regained p. 102 Full size facsimile of the title-page of the first edition of Samson Agonistes p. 103 Full size facsimile of the title-page of the second edition of the Poems . p. 104 Title-page of the second edition of Paradise Lost ...... p. 105 Signature of John Milton, 19 Nov. 1651, written in the Album Amicorum of Christopher Arnold, Professor of History at Nuremberg, now preserved edition of Paradise Lost, folio, Tonson, 1688 . . . folding plate to face p. 117 Engraving of John Milton by R. White, forming the frontispiece to the fourth NOTE This is a reprint, on hand made paper, of the Milton Tercentenary- catalogue, and was prepared after the exhibition had been closed. In order to make it as useful as possible to collectors of Milton engravings, all the items in the list from pages 29 to 90 have been renumbered, a separate number being given to every print whether an example of it was, or was not, shown at the exhibition. The earlier catalogues will show the actual prints exhibited in Cambridge, while this reprint is intended to be a work of reference with regard to all the prints at present known. The note, stating to whom the various examples belong, is also omitted, but the great majority of the engravings are in the author's own possession, comparatively few being in the hands of other collectors, and not represented in his collection. Three hundred copies only, of this special edition of the catalogue, have been printed for the author, and are for private circulation. It contains, in addition to the corrections already mentioned, several others in the introductory essays and in the appendix. PREFACE John Milton, born in Bread Street, London, 9 December 1608, was admitted a pensioner of Christ's College 12 February 1625, according to the modern reckoning — 1624, according to the old style in the Admission Book. He resided apparently without a break until he was admitted to the M.A. degree, 3 July 1632. Tradition assigns to him rooms on the first floor of staircase N on the left side of the First Court as you enter by the great gateway; but it is certain that in the seventeenth century each set on the first floor was occupied by a Fellow, at most with his attendant sizar ; Milton however was not a sizar. He must have had two or three fellow- students as joint tenants ; the College was very full, and there existed only the First Court, a block of buildings, called Rats' Hall, in the middle of the present Second Court, and an inn called the Brazen George, adjacent to St Andrew's Church, improperly used to hold undergraduates : the " Fellows' Building " dates from 1642. His life here has been often told — copiously, but with judgment, by Prof. Masson. It is likely that he was not loved by his equals in age, for he was "not ignorant of his own parts," and it is quite conceivable that he gave a grudging obedience to those who were placed over him, the Master, Dean and Head Lecturer; certainly he was on bad terms with his first tutor, William Chappell (afterwards Bishop of Cork) by whom he was trans- ferred to Nathaniel Tovey, but the story of his flogging by Chappell rests (as I have pointed out in my History of Christ's College, p. 146) on untrustworthy evidence. Beyond a doubt he was appreciated as he deserved by the Master and Fellows before he left Cambridge and might well have been elected to a Fellowship, had he been prepared to take Holy Orders {id. 148). But he cast the chance behind him. In his early life there is clearly traceable a resolute ambition, combined with a rare mental balance. He knew his strength, knew what he could do, knew that he would do it. There was a great work before him : he must be thoroughly prepared. So he left Cambridge for Horton, to enter upon a second period of preparatory study in which he was to be his own guide ; but that period produced such finished \ viii PREFACE work as LAllegro and // Penseroso (probably written in 1632), Arcades, Comus (in 1634), Lycidas (1637). His most memorable poems while he was at Christ's are the lines On the death of a fair infant (1626), On the morning of Christ's nativity (1629), An epitaph on the Marchioness of Winchester (1631), Sonnet on arriving at the age of Tzventy-three (1631). Ample specimens of his exercises both in the College and in the Schools are given by Prof. Masson in his first volume. Each year we hold our domestic commemoration of all our benefactors and worthies. This year gives to us an opportunity, which we welcome, not only of dwelling upon our connexion with John Milton — "for we were nursed upon the self same hill " — but also of asking others to join us in a commemo- ration of one whose preeminence among those reared in this College can be questioned in favour of none save perhaps of Charles Darwin. We ask all to enjoy with us the sight of portraits, of books, of other objects which have interest by their relation to Milton. We believe that no collection so large has been previously made ; to make it needed special knowledge and unusual zeal and energy, for which we owe a very great debt to Dr G. C. Williamson and to Mr Charles Sayle — a debt all the greater that we cannot claim them as members of our body. Dr Williamson has contributed the following account of Milton portraits, has lent us many of which he is the owner, and has procured us the loan of others : he has also dealt with early editions of the poems : Mr Sayle has contributed an appendix on editions and on books about Milton to be found at Cambridge. Among those who have been lenders special thanks are due to the Earl of Ellesmere, to Lord Sackville, to Lord Leconfield, to the Right Hon. Lewis Harcourt, to H. Clinton Baker, Esq., to Mrs Morrison, to J. F. Payne, Esq., M.D. ; to Wynne E. Baxter, Esq.; to the University Library Syndicate, to the Master and Fellows of Trinity College, and to the authorities of the other colleges and libraries who have permitted us to exhibit the literary treasures now on view ; to the Clarendon Press, Oxford, to Messrs Sotheran and Co., Pickering and Chatto, and George Bell and Sons. JOHN PEILE. Christ's College Lodge, 5 fune, 1908. 10 of*, dH> bendy k*t Oorn on S^njdy Jtlty-cL jjttsttQnij V**" mArkt.'^ 'due/I .i Ctu4r jl ■ JciuS oLn) ?nM Went M-u*.'. a\*tvnJ> • ^ C-) ^^^1*. / iJ^aLk. .aajrsa* Page from John Milton's Bible, in the British Museum, giving the entries made with his own hand relative to the birth of himself and various members of his family. I THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON Collectors of prints have long been troubled by the strange and perplexing variety of portraits, said to represent John Milton, which, from time to time, they have obtained ; and more than one writer has endeavoured to set forth clearly some statement respecting these portraits. There was not, however, any scholarly attempt to grapple with the complexity of the subject until i860, when Mr John Fitchett Marsh, who had been for many years a collector of the engraved portraits of the poet, prepared an elaborate treatise concerning them, which he read before the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire and published in the Transactions of the Society, Vol. XII. He was able, on that occasion, to exhibit to the members of the Society over 150 prints and grouped them out, with considerable judgement, under various headings. To his list, all later collectors owe a very great deal, and it has been accepted as a standard by which the value and extent of other collections may be measured; while the theories set forth by Mr Marsh have, as a rule, been accepted. He, however, laboured under one special difficulty, as he was not acquainted with either of the original portraits of the poet and his arguments were based, almost exclusively, upon the engravings he himself possessed. In this respect, we have at the present time, one advantage over him, inasmuch as two of the authentic portraits of the poet are available, and of a third there is a perfect copy in existence, which may be taken to represent the original. Mr Marsh's list of engravings was a considerable advance upon any previous list. Granger referred to 37 portraits, Bromley to 25, Evans to 42, Marsh to 164, and although the latter compiler does not appear to have omitted anything of any special importance, yet we are able to add some to his list and to subjoin information respecting over 180 portraits. It may be well to refer briefly to the various groups of which the collection is composed. w. 1 2 THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON The first relates to those engravings copied from the portrait of Milton at the age of ten, and this special portrait, perhaps the most important of all, has only been traced while these pages were being passed for press 1 . It is the picture referred to by Aubrey in his notes written shortly after Milton's death ; 'Ao. Dni. 1619. He was ten yeares old, as by his picture and was then a poet : his school master was then a Puritan in Essex^ who cut his (i.e. Milton's) hair short." It was one of the pictures which remained in the possession of Milton's widow (his third wife) until her death in 1727, and was enumerated in the inventory of her effects at Nantwich. On June 3rd, 1760, it was pur- chased by Mr Thomas Hollis, the republican (1720 — 1774), to whom we shall have occasion to refer several times. He was an ardent admirer of Milton, a strong patriot, the editor of Toland's Milton, 1761, of Algernon Sidney's work, 1772, and a generous benefactor to Harvard, Berne, Zurich and Cam- bridge, giving to the public institutions in these places, books and portraits relating to the heroes of the Commonwealth, the objects of his admiration. On his decease he left his estate to his friend Thomas Brand who assumed the name and arms of Hollis, and he, in his turn, bequeathed The Hyde and its contents, and a considerable estate, to his friend, the Reverend Dr Disney (who afterwards wrote a memoir of Thomas Brand Hollis), and in the possession of his descendant, the estate still remains. The Milton portrait was bought at the sale of the effects of Mr Charles Stanhope, who had mentioned to Mr Hollis, two months before, that he had bought it of the executors of Milton's widow, for twenty guineas. Hollis gave thirty-one guineas for it and valued it as the choicest of his posses- sions. On one occasion when a fire broke out in Mr Hollis's chambers, this was the only possession he was anxious to save, and his biographer tells us, that after he had slipped his purse into his pocket, he went calmly out into the street, carrying the Milton portrait in his hands. It passed with the rest of his possessions to Dr Disney and eventually to his grandson, Mr Edgar Disney. Professor Masson described it as a portrait set in a dark oval, about 27 inches by 20 inches in size including the frame, and having the words "John Milton aetatis suae 10 anno 1618" inscribed on the paint in contemporary characters. Hollis had a careful drawing and etching made of 1 See subsequent note, p. m, and the Times of 3 June, 1908. John Milton at the age of ten. From the painting by Cornelis Janssen, dated 1618, in the possession of Mr J. Passmore Edwards. YOUTHFUL PORTRAITS 3 it by Cipriani, and it forms No. i in our catalogue of the prints. It may be mentioned here that the Hollis prints, of which there are four, are to be found on both green and white paper, those on the former being the most rare ; there is also, of one of them, a proof before letters in the author's collection. The picture was attributed to Cornelius Janssen, who is styled on the Hollis print "Johnson," but who receives the more correct spelling of his name, on a further print from the same picture, when it belonged to Mr Thomas Brand Hollis, who had it engraved by Gardiner for Boydell's sumptuous edition of Milton's works in 3 Vols., royal folio. When the picture was in Mr Edgar Disney's possession it was photographed, and a charming engraving was made by Edward Radclyffe, which forms the frontis- piece to Masson's Milton. The only other youthful portrait of the poet, is one which appeared in the Gentleman's Magazine for September 1787, engraved almost in outline. It was accompanied by a letter, dated from Oxford, sending the drawing from which the portrait was engraved, and which the letter states " A friend who lives there has obligingly suffered to be taken from a picture in his possession. It is on wood. At top is Ao. 1623. aet suae 12. In the hands of the figure is a book with Homers Iliads on the leaves. The hair is red. This drawing is very like, only perhaps somewhat older than the picture." There is a good deal of complexity respecting this picture. It certainly closely resembles the one by Janssen and has many resemblances to what we know of Milton's personal appearance, especially in the fact that the colour of his hair was certainly reddish in his early days. The date however cannot be accurate. It is either misprinted in the Gentleman's Magazine, which seems likely to be the case ; or else there is a mistake with regard to the age of the boy ; but the question cannot be readily dismissed, because of the resemblance in features and it seems just possible that there was then in existence, and may be even so now, an almost unknown portrait of Milton as a boy with some claims to authenticity. The drawing was referred to in the same volume on page 892 by a correspondent who pointed out the striking resemblance it bears to the Cipriani print, but this second correspondent started a confusion about the dates, which, by the way, seems to have been rather a feature of the whole controversy; no one engraver or collector taking adequate pains to verify dates and information. We now come to the second of the two portraits enumerated in the 1 — 2 4 THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON inventory of Mrs Milton's effects, and here we have to state that the original work is not available for comparison or study. Aubrey, who wrote in 1681, refers to the picture as follows : " his widowe has his picture drawne (very well and like) when a Cambridge schollar : she has his picture when a Cambridge schollar which ought to be engraven ; for the pictures before his books, are not at all like him." In 1 72 1 Deborah Clarke, Milton's daughter, informed George Vertue that her stepmother, if living, in Cheshire, had two portraits of Milton, one when he was a school boy, to which we have just alluded, and another when he was about twenty. In 1731, four years after Mrs Milton's death, the picture was in the possession of Mr Speaker Onslow, and was engraved by Vertue, and as late as 1794 it was stated in the inscription to the engraving in Boydell's Milton to be "in the possession of Lord Onslow at Clandon, in Surrey, purchased from the executors of Milton's widow by Arthur Onslow Esq., speaker of the House of Commons, as certified in his own hand writing at the back of the picture." Speaker Onslow was a notable collector of portraits, and amongst all he possessed, valued this one the most highly. He had a great friend, Lord Harcourt, who was keenly anxious to possess the portrait, but he refused to part with it, consenting, however, to have a perfect copy made of it, if Lord Harcourt in his turn, would have a portrait he possessed, of Pope, by Kneller, copied for him. The work was carried out by Benjamin Van der Gucht, Vertue's master, and although the copy he made of the Kneller, has disappeared, that of the Milton, is still in existence, and by the kindness of the Right Honourable Lewis Harcourt, M.P., is shown in this exhibition, having been removed for that purpose from Nuneham (see frontispiece to this book). It is a faithful copy, as Van der Gucht tells us in the long inscription he has placed upon its reverse, see under Portraits. The original was sold 1 in 1828 for the sum of jQ2>. i2f. od. to a Mr Moore or More who was declared to be "not a dealer." It is curious to note that the same name, Moore, appears in connection with the next portrait to be mentioned. At the same sale there were many other portraits sold, some of the chief being as follows. Sir Thomas More £4. \ds. od., Thomas Cromwell £4. 15*. od., Sir Walter Raleigh jf$. 18*. od., Bacon £4. 18s. od., Spenser £4. 4s. od., 1 Sir George Scharf heard that Lord Onslow, being annoyed l>y visitors who wanted to see the Milton portrait, had it destroyed, and that it " was only a daub purporting to be a copy " that was sold. John Milton at the age of 62. Engraving from life by William Faithorne, from Milton's History of Britain, 1670. See (24). THE ONSLOW PORTRAIT 5 Pope 12s. od., Dryden by Kneller j£i, Sir I. Newton, oval, ^4, Sir Charles Lucas by Dobson £21, Lord Somers in robes as Chancellor, 1695, and Dr Burnet, 1690, a pair, ^5. 10s. od., Dudley, Earl of Leicester jQ6. 6s. od., Queen Elizabeth £6. 6s. od., Henrietta Maria £15. 10s. od., William III £10. 10s. od., George I $s. cd., George II 5^ od. An interesting miniature copy of the lost Onslow portrait is exhibited by Mr Arthur E. Shipley. Of the Onslow portrait there are many prints. The chief is, of course, the one by Vertue dated 1731, and of it there are two or three varieties, one of extreme rarity. Then there is the Houbraken portrait, executed in Amsterdam in 1741, for which it is believed Mr Shipley's miniature was the model, as Houbraken was unable to come to England and it does not appear that the original Onslow portrait was ever sent abroad. The copper plate for this Houbraken engraving has recently been acquired by Mr Shipley (page 153), and excellent prints from it have been struck off. There is a late German reproduction of the Onslow portrait and more than one lithograph, and an interesting print which appeared in the London Magazine and, altered in size, in the British Biography. In 1785 the Onslow portrait was engraved by Goldar for Harrison's edition of Rapin ; but the two best known engravings from it are, first, the one prepared by Cipriani for Thomas Hollis, having beneath it Milton's sonnet " How soon hath time," etc. ; and the other made for Boydell's Milton in the time of Mr Thomas Brand Hollis, and engraved, like the one by Janssen, by W. N. Gardiner in 1794. Proofs before letter are known of each, that of the former being in our possession. In considering the prints from this exceedingly interesting portrait, we must not overlook one which appeared in Macrone's edition of Milton's works edited by Sir Egerton Brydges, in which Edwards was the engraver. The portrait is clearly the Onslow one, see 30, but by a slip on the part of the engraver, Janssen is declared to have been the original painter, a confusion having been made between this Onslow portrait and the one of Milton at the age of ten. We do not know at all who was the painter of the Onslow portrait and have no means of forming any theory about it, as it is clear that Van der Gucht did not know whose work it was, and we have not now the original picture to refer to. In 1645, Humphrey Moseley's original edition of Milton's poems was brought out, and William Marshall was employed to produce a portrait as 6 THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON a frontispiece. This is the rare and precious engraving signed W. M., which has beneath it the Greek epigram, composed by the poet, in which he laughs to scorn the fact of its being a likeness of him. There are certain slight resemblances between it and the Onslow picture ; they are very slight and in some respects it even more closely resembles the Janssen portrait, but it cannot be accepted in any way as a satisfactory representation of the great poet, and we know in fact, from the epigram " In effigiei ejus sculptorem," how dissatisfied Milton was with the manner in which Marshall had produced the engraving. The generally accepted theory, to which Horace Walpole refers, was that Marshall, who frequently worked for Moseley, drew from life ; and Vertue seems to have adopted this theory, but it is hardly possible that it was so ; and in the fact that in the next important portrait of Milton, the artist expressly declares that it was drawn from life, there lies an argument against the statement, that Marshall drew the actual portrait from the poet himself. His engraving is evidently to a great extent imaginary and cannot be said to represent the poet at thirty-seven, being in fact much more of the nature of a caricature, although evidently the same man as in the Faithorne portrait. As already mentioned, the print of it is rare, and it has not hitherto been easy to obtain a fine impression of the later printing from it which appeared in Samson Agonistes in 1 748. The plate for this later printing however, which belonged to Evans, still exists. There is also a reduced copy, signed by Van der Gucht, which is in Tonson's edition of Paradise Regained, 1 713, and in which the same Greek inscription, laughing the engraver to scorn, is solemnly rendered by the new engraver, happily, it is to be hoped, ignorant of the condemnation he was unwittingly calling down upon himself. It may, we take it, be granted that there is no original to be looked for in respect to this engraving. It is hardly likely that it would have been kept, even if a preparatory drawing for the engraving was ever made. If the head of Erato in the W. M. engraving is carefully examined the difference between the original and the later plate will at once be noticed. In the original the head is full of careful modelling, in the later one almost blank. The Van der Gucht reduction omits the four Muses altogether. When we approach the next portrait we are on surer ground and fortunately the original is still in existence. It is, as Marsh reminds us, the only likeness of the poet taken at a mature age and published with what John Milton, by Faithorne. From the original work in the possession of Sir Robert H. Hobart, K.C.V.O., M.P. THE HOBART PORTRAIT 7 we may deem his consent during his life time, and it has been the subject of more frequent copies than any other print. The original impression, in which the poet is declared as being sixty-two years old, is dated 1670, and the engraving, which appeared in Milton's History of Britain, for that year, bears the name of the artist, William Faithorne, and the express statement that it was both drawn and engraved by him, and from life. The first state of the print bore the date 1607 and this state is of extreme rarity, Louis Fagan declaring in his book on Faithorne, that in the Roupell sale, July 5, 1887, a print of it (Lot 127) fetched ^31. This is a price which would be enormously increased if the print were now to come into the market. Of the early history of the original drawing we know very little. It is believed to have been in the possession of the Tonsons, the publishers, and there seems to be some evidence that this is the case, but the confusion between this and the next drawing to be referred to, which certainly was in the possession of the Tonsons, is twice confounded, and although Marsh goes into the matter exceedingly carefully, yet he is not able to disentangle the various statements made by different authors concerning two portraits, one of which certainly belonged to the Tonsons and both of which may have been in their possession. The so-called Faithorne, which represents the poet in a dark dress with white collar, tied with tassels, and long flowing hair, is a bust portrait, painted on canvas, measuring 23 inches by 18 inches. It was exhibited at the South Kensington Museum in 1866, No. 820, and was then in the possession of Mr Edmund F. Moore, Q.C. It is pretty clear why he acquired it, inasmuch as his ancestress was Anne, the daughter of Thomas Agar of the Crown Office, London, by Ann Milton, his wife, who was the daughter of John Milton of Bread Street and the sister of John Milton the poet. Anne Agar married David Moore of Sayes Court, Chertsey, great grandson of Thomas Moore, secretary to Queen Anne Boleyn. Their son was Sir Thomas Moore, who married Elizabeth Blunden, and their great great grandson Edmund was the owner of the picture in 1866. No doubt his intimate connection with the Milton family was the reason for his acquiring the portrait, inasmuch as through the failure of descendants in the male line the representation of the Milton family was then, and is still, vested in David Moore's descendants. The present owner of the picture, Sir Robert Henry Hobart, K.C.V.O., C.B., M.P., is the son of Edmund F. Moore's sister, and the leading male representative of the 8 THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON Milton family. There is little doubt on comparing the portrait and the print, that they are connected with each other, but it should be remarked that in the engraving Faithorne has somewhat accentuated the deep hollows and heavy shadows in the poet's features beyond what is to be seen in the drawing, giving Milton a somewhat more worn expression than he has in the original ; the arrangement and shape also of the collar are different. It should be remarked that an absolute comparison is not very easy to make, inasmuch as the engraving is reversed, and further that in Vertue's engravings the features are somewhat softened, a little more closely resembling the Faithorne original, but even more accurately resembling the Bayfordbury picture, to which we next make reference. It is quite clear that neither the Hobart nor the Bayfordbury drawing was the original from which Faithorne did his print. When we come to consider the engraving, No. 31 in Marsh's list, we have, entering upon the scene of action, another person, to wit Robert White. This man comes in to make the problem a little more confusing. He was a drafts- man and engraver, born 1645, died 1703, and drew very beautifully in pencil on paper or vellum. He was a pupil of David Loggan, whose manner he followed in his pencil portraits ; and he engraved a long series of portraits of contemporary characters, mostly from his own drawings, which in the majority of cases were from life. One of the best known of his pencil portraits is that of Bunyan, which is in the British Museum. With regard to the portraits of Milton, his name first appears on the oval portrait published in the fourth edition of Paradise Lost, folio, 1688 (see illustration), for which he appears to have been the engraver. The portrait is, however, identical with the Faithorne one, in almost every respect, even down to the buttons on the vest. A little later however, we find this same man's name appearing as the drafts- man on a mezzotint by I. Simon, which is inscribed "R. White ad Vivum delin," and it would therefore appear as though we have to search for a drawing by this artist, which it is quite possible may some day be found. To this mezzotint we refer a little later on. As regards the Faithorne, the first impression is a fine strong print (see illustration), a later one is not, however, so good. Flatman's compliment to Faithorne has often been quoted and is referred to by Marsh. He said, "A 'Faithorne sculpsit' is a charm can save From dull oblivion and a gaping grave," John Milton, from the original portrait known as the Bayfordbury (or Tonson) one now in the possession of H. Clinton Baker, Esq. THE VERTUE ENGRAVINGS 9 and, as Marsh points out, the original impression of the Faithorne print is a worthy work of this clever artist, but the later one is not in his best manner, and a third, which is declared as being the original plate reduced, is quite evidently from another plate altogether, which may or may not have been the work of Faithorne. We now approach the engravings by Vertue, usually grouped together, and so arranged by Marsh, as connected with the Faithorne drawing, but in our opinion these early Vertue prints have a very close resemblance to the Bayfordbury portrait, although at the same time they are derived from the Faithorne one. As regards the Bayfordbury portrait, it originally belonged to Jacob Tonson (1656? — 1736), who owned the Kit-Cat Club collection, and it now hangs at Bayfordbury Park, near Hertford, the seat of Mr H. Clinton Baker, who possessed the manuscript of part of " Paradise Lost " sold at Sotheby's in March, 1904. It is not very clear to whom we ought to attribute this drawing. As a rule it is given to Faithorne, and Fagan includes it with the Hobart one in his list of Faithorne's works. It is most probable that this is the case, but it has also been suggested whether it is the work of Richardson, and to this theory an allusion will be made presently. What we want, however, to point out with regard to it, is, that the early Vertue engravings, dated 1720, 1747, and so on, bear in features an exceedingly close resemblance to the Bayfordbury picture, far closer than to the Faithorne drawing, which it may be well to style the Hobart picture. These two pictures are not identical, although they very closely resemble one another. In each the hair is arranged in identical fashion, the collar, tassels, vest and cloak are the same, the lines of the collar following exactly the same curves, and the folds of the gown in the Bayfordbury picture, although not exactly the same, resembling those in the Hobart picture very closely; but the expression is distinctly smoother in the Bayfordbury than in the Hobart picture : and the Vertue engravings more closely resemble it, whereas in the arrangement of the collar with its pendant tassels the Vertue prints resemble neither portrait and are very much closer in appearance to the original Faithorne engraving, being almost identical with it as regards the lines of the collar and the position of the tassels which fall beneath it. We cannot help feeling therefore that, although Vertue's early prints were taken either from Faithorne's engraving or from the drawing from which it was made, yet that I o THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON Vertue must have had before him the Bayfordbury picture, and, copying all the details of the vest, gown, collar and tassels exactly from Faithorne, took the features much more from the Bayfordbury picture instead of softening down, as Marsh says he did, the somewhat harsh expression of the Faithorne engraving. There are a great many varieties of the Vertue prints, differing in small details, but all showing a common origin, and that origin is revealed in the arrangement of the collar and tassels. In the Hobart and Bayfordbury pictures the collar is a soft, somewhat narrow one, the two points of it spreading apart and revealing the tassels which lie close up to the point of the collar seen on the spectator's right. This characteristic we shall see presently in the Simon mezzotint. In the Faithorne print on the other hand, the collar is broad, square and Genevan in shape, the two points of it coming very close to one another, and the two tassels or lace ends (it is not very clear which) falling below the centre of the collar just by the opening. Amongst these prints should be specially noticed one engraved by Kyte in a set of four poets which appears to have escaped the attention of Mr Marsh. One of the most creditable is that published in June 1796 for Richter's edition of Paradise Lost, quarto, 1794, and one of the finest pieces of recent engraving is the oval by H. Robinson published in 1831 in Pickering's Aldine edition. The print by W. C. Edwards, 79, 80, 81, has the same softened expression, which can be seen in (54) and (55), even more accentuated. The rarest of all is the small mezzotint by Simon, clearly taken from the Faithorne print, but not from either the Hobart or Bayfordbury pictures. Here again the features are softened from their original austerity. The engraving by Cook, 85, and the line engraving by Adlard, 88, on the other hand, were, it should be noticed, taken direct from the Hobart picture and are identical with it in the arrangement of collar, cord and tassels. They are certainly not derived from the Faithorne or Vertue print, although they claim to be. We now come to a group of prints which Marsh arranges as those derived from the Faithorne portrait, and are face to face with a difficulty almost at once. No. 91 one of the Hollis prints, is declared as having been etched by Cipriani at the desire of Thomas Hollis from a portrait in crayons, now in the possession of Messrs Tonson, booksellers in the Strand. It is perfectly certain, however, that the crayon portrait mentioned on this print, is neither the Hobart SIMON'S MEZZOTINT nor the Bayfordbury picture, although we know that one of these belonged to Tonson and we believe that both of them were once in that gentleman's possession. The arrangement of the collar and tassels absolutely precludes the possibility of this being the case. The print is identical with the Faithorne print, and the folds of the gown, the buttons of the vest, the arrangement of the hair, and the shape of the mouth follow the Faithorne print exactly, and differ in all these respects from the Hobart and Bayfordbury pictures. The etcher has let his own fancy lead him astray with regard to the length of the hair and the position of the eyes, which in Faithorne's engraving are both turned to the spectator's left and in the Cipriani etching face the spectator ; but in other respects he has followed Faithorne's print exactly, and therefore if the statement on the print is correct there is yet another authentic portrait to be sought for, the one in crayons done by Faithorne for his engraving, and if that is so it would appear as possible that a third portrait of Milton was in the possession of Messrs Tonson, in addition to the Hobart and Bayfordbury portraits, and that one has never yet been discovered. The whole thing may be a mistake of Cipriani's, or it may point to the existence of a third Faithorne drawing. Continuing down Marsh's list, we now come to what he calls the White portrait, Simon's rare folio mezzotint, on which there are two states, both included in the author's collection ; and in it we have a representation closely resembling the Bayfordbury portrait, and also to a great extent the Hobart portrait. The arrangement of the collar and tassels is identical with both of them, even to the little loops of string, from which the tassels hang, but both the Bayfordbury and Hobart pictures show many more buttons to the vest than appear in Simon's mezzotint, and the folds of the gown which fall from the shoulder are not identical with either of these two known originals. The features, however, can hardly have been taken from anything but the Bayford- bury portrait, and then enters in another theory, because Simon's mezzotint represents the poet with a laurel wreath and that wreath appears in the next group of engravings, called the White-Richardson likeness, and which Richardson declared was taken from an excellent original (crayons) in his possession. Yet at the same time the Simon mezzotint is inscribed " R. White ad Vivum delin." The theory we suggest, to account for the complication, is that the White mezzotint and the Richardson etchings were both taken from 12 THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON the Bayfordbury picture, which may or may not have been the work of Faithorne, and may or may not have been the work of Richardson. Richardson does not actually claim it. He says it is in his collection, but it is spoken of by his contemporaries as being his own work. This statement we are disposed to doubt. That the Bayfordbury picture is the work of Robert White, we do not in the least believe, and have no evidence whatever to connect White with a large portrait such as this one is. It is, however, more likely that White made a fine pencil drawing from the Bayfordbury picture and added to it the laurel wreath, which is of course an addition (and actually so stated, by Richardson in his Explanatory Note, 1674), diminished the number of buttons in the vest, and slightly re-arranged the folds of the gown, and that from his drawing Simon made his mezzotint (which it will be seen, page 61, has been copied in Germany), and Richardson made his etchings, altering again the portrait in certain respects in order to please himself. There must have been the intervention of a drawing because of the presence of the laurel wreath, which later on Richardson omitted, and because the figure is turned round rather more fully to the spectator, revealing the vest in the centre of the portrait, and, in the case of Richardson's etchings, adding two lines on either side of the buttons, and in Whites drawing one such line: to show the opening of the vest. Richardson altered the number of leaves in the wreath in two of his etchings, one having nine leaves on the right temple and the other eleven ; and in his final work he omitted the wreath altogether, greatly improving the portrait, and added six lines beneath it which are signed " J. R. jun.," and were probably the work of the son, while the father himself, we take it, was responsible for the etching. These Richardson etchings appeared in 1734, and are alluded to by the artist in Explanatory Notes and Remarks on Milton , s Paradise Lost. The original plates for them all belonged to Evans, and now to Mr A. E. Shipley. The final portrait 117, which is the best and closely resembles the Bayford- bury portrait, was issued in brown and in black ink. In the former it is rare ; the Rev. J. W. Cartmell possesses an impression shown in the exhibition. We have not, however, finished with the work of Vertue, who was well acquainted with the features of Milton and is believed to have been scrupu- lously faithful in representing them. His fine folio print of 1725 is clearly taken from the Hobart and Bayfordbury portraits, probably from the former, VERTUE'S DRAWING 13 and in the arrangement of hair, collar, cords and tassels follows the Hobart exactly, while in the softened expression of features it is more nearly like the Bayfordbury picture. He, however, invariably made one curious mistake. In Milton's arms was a double-headed eagle, but Vertue has -always drawn it as a single-headed bird. In addition to engraving portraits of the poet, Vertue made two drawings, both of which are in the author's collection. One is referred to on the plate engraved by W. N. Gardiner for the Boydell Milton, and this drawing is stated to have been at that time in the possession of Thomas Brand Hollis. From it is derived the engraving by Owen, and also to a certain extent those by Blood, Cooper, Hicks, Schmidt, and the one published in Pickering's 3 Vol. edition of the Poetical Works, 1826. It is possible that this drawing by Vertue was known to Van der Gucht when he executed his folio plate for Rolli's Italian translation of Paradise Lost in 1736, but while accepting the features, Van der Gucht, and those who followed him, Mollison and Baratti, have entirely transformed the costume, clothing the figure, to use Marsh's expressions, " in the slovenly undress in vogue among the artists of his day." The waistcoat, vest and collar are all represented open. As regards collar and tassels this fine drawing by Vertue resembles the Hobart and Bayfordbury pictures, but the features are older in expression than in those portraits. The three French prints, 138, 139, 140, are also taken from the Hobart picture in details, but in countenance resemble the Vertue drawing. In the next group of prints we come again to the Bayfordbury picture, and the engravings by Miller, Simpson, Holl, Tallis, Dean and others, are all taken from the Bayfordbury portrait, and in fact several of them state in definite language that they are "from an original painting, by Faithorne, in the collection of William Bayford, Esq." As we have already stated this piece of information may be absolutely correct and the Bayfordbury drawing is most probably by Faithorne, but we cannot determine this with absolute certainty, as there is just a possibility that it is by Richardson, and a very indefinite possibility that it may be a unique large drawing by White. The general consensus of opinion, however, is strongly in favour of its being by Faithorne. THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON We now leave the engravings made from drawings and approach those derived from busts, medallions and seals. Thomas Hollis, in a paper dated July 30, 1757, referred to an original model in clay of the head of Milton which he endeavoured to purchase, " but it was knocked down to Mr Reynolds by a mistake of Mr Ford the auctioneer." He goes on to state that two years before Mr Vertue died, he had mentioned that he was the possessor of this bust, and that " he believed it was done by one Pierce," a sculptor whose bust of Wren can be seen in the Bodleian. Hollis' opinion, however, was that it was modelled by Abraham Simon, and that afterwards a seal was engraved after it, by his brother Thomas Simon. Reynolds gave £9. 12s. od. for the bust and sold it to Mr Hollis for ^12. 12*. od., and the original is now in the possession of Christ's College, Cambridge, and is illustrated in this book. From it more than one engraving has been made, the chief being the one which Richardson drew, and Vertue engraved, for the folio edition of Milton's Prose Works, 1738 ; and the one etched by Cipriani for Mr Hollis, at the time that he owned the bust. In this latter etching 178 Cipriani has added a collar and buttoned vest to his own fancy. He also made another drawing of the same bust but this time in profile, and at the time he did it the bust had passed by will into the possession of Dr Disney, Thomas Brand Hollis' successor in the estate. It was engraved by H. Meyer, see 181 and 182-3. Now Richardson again comes on the scene, because he made a series of etchings from this bust, but clothed them in a collar with cords and tassels, exactly the same as he had done in his previous etchings, but altogether different from the square Genevan collar, which Cipriani and Vertue had put on to the bust. To these etchings he supplied a laurel wreath, differing in structure and in the number of leaves from the laurel wreaths used on 113 and 114, and added a quotation from Mansus below the bust and put the name of Milton in Greek letters on the pedestal. It will be seen therefore that, although he accepted the clay bust as his original model, he varied it con- siderably both in coctume and in features to his own ideas. Not content, however, with this, he went still further, and produced a profile in 1738, to which he added the name of Milton in Greek letters, but this does not bear the very slightest resemblance to any other portrait of Milton in existence and is much more like Richardson himself or his own etching of Pope. PRETENDED PORTRAITS J 5 Marsh believed that the original drawing for this etching belonged to Boswell and was sold at the sale of his library in 1825. Although intended for Milton it must not be accepted as a genuine portrait. A far more interesting representation of the Christ's College bust is to be seen in the engraving made by Cipriani for Hollis 192, to commemorate Milton's victory over Salmasius. It was prepared to the design of Mr Hollis and intended to illustrate a projected edition of Milton's Prose Works. Mr Hollis paid Cipriani twenty-five guineas for it, but the edition of the Prose Works was never prepared, and the print appears in the memoirs of Hollis. There are two curious varieties of it 193 and 194. From Rysbrack's monument in Westminster Abbey there are three prints, and from other busts three more, one of which 202, appearing as the frontispiece to Cowper's Milton, has no resemblance whatever to Milton. From medallions, there are six prints, the chief being the one which appears in Peck's memoirs and illustrates a medal struck at the expense of William Benson to be presented, as stated by Dr Joseph Warton in a note to his brother's edition of the minor pcems, for " the best verses that were pro- duced on Milton at all our great schools." Of other medallions an interesting example is the one published by Sharpe in 1809, engraved by Smith, forming a vignette to the title page of the edition of Paradise Lost, 12010, 1809. Mr Hollis is believed to have had a small steel puncheon of Milton's head, intended for a seal or ring, engraved by Thomas Simon, and Marsh states that this was afterwards in the possession of Mr Albert Way. Simon certainly engraved a medallion for a seal of Milton, which is said to have been drawn by James Deacon, the miniature painter and wood engraver, who died in 1750. The seal belonged to Mr Yeo, and Rylands made an engraving of it, which is now exceedingly rare. There are also three other engravings from this seal ; on one the engraver's name could not be read by Mr Marsh, who possessed the only known example of it, and the other two, almost equally precious, were engraved by Holloway and Romnery. A wax impression from one of the seals is in the National Portrait Gallery. We now come to the large group of pretended portraits, chief amongst which is the miniature by Cooper. Its history is as follows. It was bought 16 THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON for one hundred guineas in 1784 by Sir Joshua Reynolds from a picture dealer named Hunt, who, according to Northcote, "had obtained it from a common furniture broker, who could not remember either the time or manner in which he came by it." It was signed with the painter's initials "S. C," and dated 1653, and on the back of it was written the following inscription : " This picture belong'd to Deborah Milton who was her Fathers Amannuensis at her death was sold to Sr Willm Davenants Family. It was painted by Mr Saml Cooper who was painter to Oliver Cromwell at ye time Milton was Latin Secratary to ye Protector. — The Painter & Poet were near of the same age. Milton was born in 1608 & died in 1674. Cooper was born in 1609 & died in 1672 & were Companions & friends till Death parted Them. Several encouragers and Lovers of ye fine Arts at that time wanted this picture, particularly Lord Dorset John Somers Esqr Sr Robt Howard Dryden Atterbury Dr Aldrich & Sr John Denham." In Warton's edition of Milton, 1784, the miniature was referred to, and in the second edition, 1 791, again mentioned, with some additional remarks, suggesting that it resembled a portrait of Selden; and this statement gave rise to a letter in the Gentleman's Magazine of May 20th, 1791, written, so later facts proved, by Lord Hailes. Sir Joshua answered this letter on the 15th June, signing himself " R. J.," and his answer in extenso appears in Northcote's life. There was a further reply in the Gentleman's Magazine for October. Marsh sets forward, fairly clearly, the facts of the argument. Lord Hailes proved the impossibility of reconciling the statements given in the memorandum with the date of Deborah's death ; pointed out that Sir John Denham died several years before Milton, and questioned the language used in the inscription and inferring that it would not have been in use at the time, and that the phrase "fine arts" was unknown in English until long after 1693. Sir Joshua endeavoured to meet his arguments, said that the memorandum was written before 1693, when Mr Somers was knighted, and stated that as Milton died insolvent and Deborah Clarke was in great indigence, the portrait was sold by her to the author of the memorandum. Lord Hailes denied that Milton died insolvent, pointed out that Deborah was living apart from her father for several years before his death and was hardly likely, being so very poor, to have retained the miniature from 1674 to 1693 before she sold it. He also referred to her express statement to Vertue that " she knew of no other THE COOPER MINIATURE 17 picture of her father than the two" in the possession of his widow. Sir Joshua Reynolds confined the greater part of his further argument to an opinion respecting the quality of the portrait, which was rather beside the mark, as its quality was unimpeachable, and the fact that it was a work of Cooper had never been called in question. It is more to the point now to direct attention to the fact that the miniature does not resemble either of the accepted portraits, especially the one by Faithorne with which it has been compared. The President, however, strongly believed in its authenticity, and bequeathed it to the Reverend William Mason, who in his turn, by his will, in 1797, left it to William Burgh, Esq., LL.D., of York, and from him it passed into the possession of the Morritt family and has been preserved at Rokeby for many years. It is a very long time since the public have seen it, as Rokeby has been let many times and the miniature put away safely in the strong room, but when last it was exhibited in the early seventies, we had no hesitation in considering that, although an exceedingly fine miniature by Cooper, it bore no resemblance whatever to Milton. Curiously enough, however, it has been accepted by the public as the favourite portrait, has been engraved and re- produced many times, and still forms the frontispiece to one of the best editions of Milton's prose works, the Bohn edition, issued by George Bell and Sons. The story of the controversy appears on the plate engraved by Caroline Watson in 1786, and there are other representations of the portrait, both from her hand, in 1808, and from those of Boutrois, Haid, Cochran and Sharp, one of the best being the rare Sharp print, which was printed in Du Rouveray's edition of Paradise Lost, 1802, and again issued in 1808. Boutrois has curiously mixed up the whole story and has called the painter of the miniature Reynolds instead of Cooper. A very poor representation of the same miniature was drawn by W. M. Craig, but he has represented the poet full face, whereas the miniature is in profile. There are two impressions of his print known, both engraved by Hicks. Another pretended portrait of the poet appeared in Peck's memoirs of Milton, in 1740. In a chapter on the portraits of the poet, page 103, in which the descriptions are mixed up in a most extraordinary way, Peck speaks of the one illustrated in his frontispiece as having belonged to Sir John Meres, of Kirby Bellars in Leicestershire, and proceeds to describe the w. 2 1 8 THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON colouring of the original. His only reason for considering it to be a portrait of Milton is the fact that in the portrait a book is represented inscribed "Paradice Lost." Warton and Hollis were told that Peck asked Vertue whether he thought it a picture of Milton, and Vertue's reply was very emphatically in the negative, but Peck decided to have a mezzotint made of it and submitted to the public, and he did so. As Mr Marsh states, "posterity has long since settled the difference, not much to Mr Peck's credit," as "his effort was an impudent attempt to foist a pretended portrait upon the public." The portrait was issued separately from the volume, for sale to the public, and is therefore to be found in two states, one in black on the thin paper on which the book was printed, and another in a greenish black shade on rough, coarser and heavier paper with a very full margin. Another miniature has been said to be a portrait of Milton. In January 1 791, the Reverend J. Elderton, of Bath, referred in the Genffeman's Magazine to the existence of a miniature in his possession, which, he says, "belonged to his child's great ancestor, Sir Edward Seymour, who was Speaker of the House of Commons and grandfather of the Duke of Somerset: it has been seen by connoisseurs who always agreed it was an original: the hair is of a dark chesnut colour, flowing down to the shoulders." As some doubts were thrown upon its authenticity, Mr Elderton forwarded an outline of the miniature to the Magazine and an engraving by Basire appeared in the issue for January, 1792. Its only resemblance to Milton consists in the long hair. Another pretended portrait bears the name of Vertue and is dated 1751. It does not in the least resemble the authentic portraits, and was engraved by Vertue from a drawing which belonged to Richardson and was removed from his collection, he having died six years before. The person certainly has flowing hair and wears a gown and bands, but in no other respects resembles the poet. Yet another portrait is declared as having been in the collection of Lord Chesterfield, and three different engravings are known of it. As regards the vest, gown and collar it has a slight resemblance to the Faith orne portrait, but it represents a young man with a moustache and long hair, leaning his head on his hand, in an attitude of thought, and there is no reason whatever to suppose it is in the least like the poet. Portrait by Pieter van der Plas in the National Portrait Gallery considered to represent John Milton. See (156) and (157)- NATIONAL GALLERY PORTRAIT «9 A still more absurd attempt to produce a portrait of Milton was made by Harding in 1796, but there is little doubt that his print represents Killigrew, and is after a picture by Vandyck, as explained in the details of the engraving (see page 85). It is not quite so easy to dismiss off hand the picture of Milton by Pieter Van der Plas (see illustration). ' The original portrait hangs in the National Portrait Gallery, presented to the Trustees in 1839 by Mr Capel Lofft, who always insisted that it was a portrait of Milton, and published it as such in his edition of Paradise Lost, Bury St Edmunds, 1792. He said, it was bequeathed to his father, by Colonel Holland. The Director of the Portrait Gallery is by no means satisfied that it is a picture of Milton, and if it is by Pieter Van der Plas, as seems probable from the signature upon it, the doubt is intensified, because a Pieter van der Plas died in 1626, when Milton was but eighteen years old. There was, however, a Pieter David van der Plas who died in 1704, and the picture is probably by him. A staff and pilgrim's bottle and the representation of the risen Saviour would be, as Marsh points out, equally appropriate for Bunyan, whom the portrait certainly resembles, and a comparison with other portraits of Bunyan, notably the drawing in the British Museum by White, leads us to make the suggestion that the portrait may be that of the author of Pi/grim's Progress rather than of the author of Paradise Lost. It was, however, engraved by Quinton, as a portrait of Milton, and it was lithographed by M. Gauci, the lithograph being printed by F. Moser. The print is fairly common, except in an open letter proof, but the lithograph is exceedingly rare. In Dr Williams' Library, Gordon Square, is a picture by Dobson, a replica of which is in an important collection in New York, and it is possible that both the original and the replica are the work of the artist whose name they bear, but they have both been styled portraits of Milton, and an engraving by Wedgwood giving that information was issued in 1820. The portrait, however, represents a big, heavy man who bears no resemblance whatever to Milton. He has certainly a square collar with tassels, something like the one in the Faithorne drawing, but much later in date, has long hair and wears a buttoned vest and a gown, but there the resemblance ceases. An even more absurd portrait is the one engraved by Charles Pye, 1823, which represents a young man of about twenty in the costume of 17 10. To 2 — 2 20 THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON make it resemble the portraits of Milton it is declared to have been painted by Janssen, but it has no resemblance either to the work of Janssen or to the portraits of Milton. Yet another absurd portrait was engraved by R. Page. We now refer to a miniature. A certain Mr Falconer of Usk stated in Notes and Queries that he possessed a miniature, painted on vellum, which had belonged to his grandfather, and that it was the one from which an engraving was made, for the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. He uses no particular arguments to connect the portrait with Milton, but declares that his miniature was by Faithorne. Faithorne, however, was not a miniature painter, and when Milton was of the age represented in this portrait Faithorne was a boy. The face is pleasing, but possesses little character, and the portrait is most certainly not the work of Faithorne nor representing Milton. It was very possibly a miniature and may have been dated 1667, but these are the only definite facts about it, and to claim it as a portrait of Milton, as has been claimed in many editions of the poet's works, is absurd. It is the favourite original from which busts both in stone and plaster were made, but it must not be regarded as authentic. Another small portrait bears the inscription " From Faithorne," and slightly resembles the last-mentioned one, but the face is rounder and fuller and the hair is more curly. It was engraved by Smith, but is decidedly not a portrait of Milton and has not even any claim to be thought so. There is a very poor engraving by Riedel which bears the name of Milton. It is a rough rendering of the original Faithorne print, very coarsely treated, and all the features of the poet's face have been lost. Another, somewhat similar, was published in 1823 by G. Smeeton, and there again the features have been so changed that no resemblance in them to Milton's original appearance can be traced. The two lithographs, the one by Schubert and the other by Marckl, representing blind men, and the print by Maulet published in Paris, probably have no claim to be considered as anything more than fancy likenesses of the blind poet, but they bear his name and therefore must be alluded to, although they do not in the least resemble him. There is a very tiny rectangular line engraving also called Milton, very freely adapted from the Faithorne print, so freely as to have little or no Miniature by Samuel Cooper, belonging to the Duke of Buccleuch and Queensben said to represent John Milton as a young man. See under Portraits. THE KNOLE PORTRAITS 2 I connection with the poet : and finally a full length portrait, engraved by Fougeron, is declared to represent Milton and is not in the least like him in any respect. A very rare print, 8vo in size, mentioned in Rodd's Catalogue of British Portraits, 1812, was alluded to by Marsh, but he had never seen a copy of it. We have it in two states and in two inks, in our collection, and it is a good piece of engraving after the Faithorne print, but very much reduced. It bears the signature G. Coster, sculpt., and has below the portrait Dryden's well-known lines, but engraved in script. In our own time C. W. Sherborn has made a clever etching to which he has given the name of Milton. The etching resembles to a certain extent the miniature bearing the name of Milton and belonging to the collection of the Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry, and is said to have been taken from it. It is not, however, exactly the same as that miniature, the artist having taken considerable licence both with the features, which he has made far older than those in the miniature, and with the white collar and costume. Two other prints, named by Marsh but not seen or described by him, are as follows. A 4to print of Milton at four ages, representing the Janssen, Onslow, Hollis and Vertue portraits engraved by Joh. H. Lips, 1779, and the print by Hollar referred to by Parthey. This latter is certainly by W. Hollar, but almost as certainly not Milton. It represents a bust of a very young man, is unlettered and of extreme rarity. Wivell refers to a Faber print of Milton on a sheet with Shakespeare, Jonson and Butler, but this we have not seen, and Marsh had heard of a rare i2mo print by Phinn and a folio by Gunst but had not seen either of them. It will now be well to refer in conclusion to certain other portraits said to represent Milton. In the exhibition at South Kensington in 1866 there were two pictures exhibited by the Countess De La Warr, one, said to be the work of Jonathan Richardson, and with an open untidy costume, a little like that of Van der Gucht's engraving. The features are not, however, identical, and the collar, which is quite plain in the engraving, was fringed with lace in the De La Warr picture. It was a portrait on canvas, 37 inches by 28 inches, but it cannot be seriously contended that it represented Milton. The other 22 THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON picture was by Mary Beale, although attributed to Richardson. It measured 20 inches by 15 inches, and is of a young man with long reddish hair, but is not a portrait of Milton. These portraits are now at Knole, Sevenoaks. At the same exhibition there was shown by the Reverend R. C. Jenkins a portrait of a man in dark dress with a square cut white collar and tassels and with long hair, dated 1650 and inscribed Age 42. It was on canvas, 27 inches by 23 inches, and although it certainly bears some slight resem- blance to the Faithorne engraving, yet the resemblance is not sufficient for us to claim it as an authentic portrait. There is a third portrait at Knole, also said to represent Milton. It is in grisaille, 7 feet 1 inch by 4 feet 10 inches, and perhaps the work of De Wit. It represents a bust of the poet within a niche, having at the base some clever floral decoration. All three pictures Lord Sackville has been good enough to lend to Christ's College. The oil painting in the hall of Christ's College, see illustration, represents a boy of a pleasing, sweet countenance, and it has a certain amount of resemblance to the early portrait of John Milton and some slight connection with the Onslow portrait. Its history, before Mr Hildyard bought it, is not known, but it has always borne the name of Milton, and it is quite possible that it is a portrait of the poet as a boy. The miniature at Montagu House, see illustration, is certainly a work by Cooper and a very delightful one. It is a signed work originally belonging to a Mr Villiers, of Tours, and was sold as a portrait of Milton by Messrs Foster, the auctioneers, at a general sale of the Villiers property. We believe that Michael Bryan was the first person to pronounce it to be a portrait of Milton, and upon what authority he did so we do not know. Probably it was only on the general resemblance which it bore to the Onslow portrait as shown in the Houbraken engraving. It is quite possible that it may represent the poet, but we have no particular evidence to support the contention and are inclined to think that it has been called a portrait of Milton more because it represents a young man with long hair who wears a buttoned vest, a broad white collar, and has tassels showing below the margin of the collar. The presence, however, of two broad bands of black velvet down the front of the gown leads us to fear that the attribution is in error. Somewhat similar John Milton when about 48. The Woodcock portrait. In the collection of Dr G. C. Williamson. THE WOODCOCK MINIATURE 2 3 velvet appears on the Cooper-Reynolds miniature (page 80), but there is no reason to suppose that Milton had any velvet on his usual costume. There were some miniatures bearing the name of John Milton exhibited at South Kensington Museum in 1865. Mr J. G. Fanshawe lent a portrait painted in oil which he attributed to Samuel Cooper (520), Mr C. Sackville Bale a pencil drawing on paper (1801) by Richardson, closely resembling the Richardson etching already referred to. It had four portrait heads on one sheet, the central one representing John Milton and the other three Alexander Pope. The sheet had been prepared for Horace Walpole, and each drawing was signed at the back by Richardson. It came from the Strawberry Hill collection. Mr T. M. Whitehead lent an enamel on gold representing the poet when young, and attributed to Petitot, and Mr W. Phillipps lent an oil portrait which he ascribed to Samuel Cooper. The last-named item is believed to have passed into the collection of the late Dr Propert and to have been sold in May 1897 to Mr Vernon Watney, of Cornbury Park, near Oxford. The Richardson drawing is now in the Royal Library at Windsor Castle. In the Victoria and Albert Museum there is an enamel copy of the Janssen portrait by Wm Essex, signed and dated 1856, and another fine enamel portrait of the poet belongs to Mr J. W. Whitehead. Finally, we would make a brief mention of the last portrait of the poet which has been discovered, and which belongs to the author. Its history is that it was acquired from a member of the Goddard family, and that the mother of its late owner was a Miss Woodcock, who stated that the portrait had always been in the Woodcock family and had been handed down in direct succession from Catherine Woodcock, whom Milton married on November 12th, 1656. This Catherine Woodcock was the daughter of a Captain Woodcock of Hackney, and the Woodcocks who owned the minia- ture stated that their home was in Hackney. The second Mrs Milton had a baby girl on October 19th, 1657, and both she and the child died in February, 1658, and the miniature was bequeathed to Catherine Woodcock's niece, from thence coming, it is stated, in direct succession down to its late owner. It is of course quite conceivable that Deborah Milton should have known nothing whatever of any portrait of her father which had belonged to his second wife, whom she knew for so short a time ; and it can be readily 2 4 THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON understood that if, as surmised, this portrait was given to his wife, by the poet, it would be retained by her descendants, and would not fall into the hands either of the children of the first wife or of his widow, who was the third. It appears to have been cherished very tenderly by the people to whom it belonged, and their descendants only parted with it when actually compelled so to do. It is specially interesting, if a portrait of Milton, as it represents the poet at a period of his life at which we have no other portrait, for he was sixty-two when Faithorne made his engraving, and this miniature must have been painted when he was about forty-eight. It is also of peculiar importance because on two occasions Aubrey speaks of the colour of Milton's hair in middle life, once calling it " light brown," and on another occasion " reddish." Towards the end of his life this colour disappeared, but is clearly shown in the miniature in question. Aubrey also speaks of his complexion as "exceeding fayre," says that his face was "oval" and that he was "a spare man," and all these characteristics and the somewhat more elaborate detail of the lace collar worn at that special time agree with what is to be seen in this miniature. There is certainly a distinct resemblance to Milton in the miniature, and the pedigree gives it some special importance. It does not appear to have been the subject of any engraving, which is perhaps natural owing to the special history belonging to it. It has been attributed to Edmund Ashfield, but on this point we have no very definite theory. It is certainly, however, a genuine miniature of about the middle of the 17th century, bearing a very strong resemblance to Milton and having come from a family from amongst whose members Milton selected the second wife, who was only spared to him for the short period of fifteen months. A learned critic has pointed out that it resembles the authentic portrait in all general details, but less in the mouth than in other features, while curiously enough the mouth very closely resembles that in the W. Marshall print of Milton issued in 1645 (see plate following page 92). The consensus of opinion at the Milton Exhibition was in favour of its being considered as a new and authentic portrait of the poet, and its pedigree is un- assailable. The drawing by Vertue came from Strawberry Hill and has attached to it a note in Horace Walpole's handwriting respecting Vertue, reading as follows : STRAWBERRY HILL DRAWINGS 25 The Epitaph. Here lyes the body of George Vertue late Engraver And fellow of the Society of Antiquaries, Who was born in London anno 1684 And departed this life on the 24th of July 1756. With manners gentle and a gratefull heart And all the genius of the graphic art; His fame shall each succeeding artist own Longer by far than monuments of stone. " Vertue was a rigid Roman Catholic, & ordered his body to be buried in the Cloysters of Westminster Abbey, as near as possible to a spot where he had found a monk of his name had anciently been buried." It is a very important and striking drawing, and it is undoubtedly the original by Vertue for print No. 126, where the inscription records that the engraving by W. N. Gardiner is taken from "an original drawing by Vertue in the collection of Thomas Brand Hollis, Esq., at the Hyde, Essex." This drawing is on canvas, in black and brown wash, and is a little larger than the print, measuring j\ in height and 6~ in width, sight sizes, whereas the print is only 6 in height and 4f in width. A proof impression of this print is in the author's collection, evidently struck off before the outer ruling of the plate was made and before any inscription was engraved upon it, and if any- thing this proof impression more closely resembles the drawing than does the finished plate. This drawing appears to have passed from Strawberry Hill into the possession of Mr Hollis, and from him came to Dr Disney, a member of whose family sold it a few years since. Of attributed portraits there are many. A full-faced portrait on panel 17! by 14^, is at the Holburne Art Museum, Bath, another is stated to be in the Examination Hall of Queen's College, Belfast, and there are two within the walls of Christ's College, one in the Hall and the other in the possession of Mr Arthur Shipley. A curious one bearing Milton's arms and name belongs to Mrs Morrison of St Albans, and is clearly based on the Richardson etchings, and there are portraits belonging to Lord Leconfield and other 2 6 THE PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON owners. Fuller details of many of them will be found further on. It is as well to record that in a picture catalogue published by H. Rodd in 1824 there is a mention of an oil portrait of Milton, painted on canvas, 54 by 40. It was item 78, priced at £15. 15*. Represented the poet seated at a table, his hand resting on a book. Rodd stated that it more closely resembled the portrait by Faithorne in the History of Britain than any other known painting of Milton. Nothing has been discovered further regarding this portrait. The latest engraving to be issued was that presented to his subscribers in 1874 by Dr A. B. Grosart. In his prospectus he claimed for it that it was the " first really adequate and worthy reproduction of the only authenticated portrait of Milton in his age ... an engraving of a noble face, massive, tranquil as the awful sea is tranquil, celestial, true, and will grow in value with the years." It was dedicated to Mr J. F. Marsh (see page 90). G. C. W. Mm Catalogue of the Portraits of John Milton The Clay bust of Milton, said to be the work of Pierce, now preserved in the Library of Christ's College, Cambridge. See under Statuary. Catalogue of the Portraits of John Milton STATUARY WORK Clay bust. Lent by Christ's College, Cambridge. The following is a copy of a letter respecting this bust written by Mr Aldis Wright to Dr Cartmell, Master of Christ's College, 1849 — 1881. Trinity College, Cambridge. 13 Nov. 1875. My dear Master of Christ's, Since I had the pleasure, thanks to your kindness, of seeing the Milton Bust in company with Mr and Mrs Woolner, I have learnt some particulars about it which I think will be interesting to you. In the life of Thomas Hollis (4 0 London, 1870) Vol. [I. p. 513 there is an engraving by Cipriani, as unlike the original as anything can well be, which is said to be 'from a bust in plaister modelled from the life now in the possession of Thomas Hollis.' The engraving is dated 1760. I now transcribe what is said of the bust itself. " Mr Mollis, in a paper dated "July 30, 1757, says, ' For an original model in clay of the head of Milton, £g. 12s. "which I intended to have purchased myself, had it not been knocked down to " Mr Reynolds by a mistake of Mr Ford the auctioneer.' "Note, about two years before Mr Vertue died, he told me, that he had been " possessed of this head many years ; and that he believed it was done by one Pierce, "a sculptor of good reputation in those times the same who made the bust in marble "of Sir Christopher Wren, which is in the Bodleian Library. My own impression "is, that it was modelled by Abraham Simon; and that afterwards a seal was "engraved after it, in profile, by his brother Thomas Simon, a proof impression of " which is now in the hands of Mr Yeo engraver in Covent Garden. This head was "badly designed by Mr Richardson, and then engraved by Mr Vertue, and prefixed "to Milton's prose-works, in quarto, printed for A. Millar, 1753 (Barons edition). "The bust probably was executed soon after Milton had written his ' Defensio pro "populo Anglicano.' Mr Reynolds obligingly parted with this bust to Mr Hollis "for twelve guineas." Vertue whose seal is mentioned, was the engraver who died in 1756. Who Mr Reynolds may have been I can only conjecture. Perhaps Sir Joshua. Believe me, my dear Master, Yours very sincerely, W. ALDIS WRIGHT. The Rev. The Master of Christ's. 3° CATALOGUE OF THE Mr Horace Montford's original model for the statue at St Giles Cripplegate (1904) is to be seen in the vestibule to the College Chapel. The head was modelled from the Clay bust. Full length, rectangular. Full face, slightly to the right, long hair, long buttoned coat, the lower buttons being unfastened, white turned down collar with tasselled ends of cord appearing below, sleeves with buttons down the inside of the arm, knee breeches with bows, broad shoes with high tongues and bows, wide soft felt hat in left hand, fingers of gloves appearing from right-hand pocket of coat. Stands on small round pedestal. Marble bust of the head only, by Horace Montford. Lent by Christ's College, Cambridge. Removed from the Hall. A replica of the above in plaster. Lent by Arthur E. Shipley, Esq., F.R.S. Bronze miniature replica of the full length statue. Lent by Arthur E. Shipley, Esq., F.R.S. Stone Bust inscribed : J. M. Bloomfield, Paddington. The ordinary unauthentic representation of the poet. Lent by Christ's College, Cambridge. A similar smaller bust. Lent by Christ's College, Cambridge. Derby Biscuit Bust, modelled by G. Cooper and acquired from his grandson. Rare. From the Faithorne portrait. Lent by Dr Williamson. Robinson and Leadbetter's Parian Bust. Lent by Dr Williamson. Old Staffordshire full-length figure. Lent by Dr Williamson. Wedgwood's Bust in Basalt. Lent by Arthur E. Shipley, Esq., F. R.S. Wax group of Milton and his daughters. Lent from Christ's College Lodge. Plaster Bust. Lent by A. E. Shipley, Esq., F.R.S. PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON 3i •MINIATURES Probably the work of a member of the Lens family. Lent by Arthur E. Shipley, Esq., F.R.S. Three-quarter face to the right. Boyish expression, blue buttoned doublet, falling lace ruff showing two tassels, long hair, brown background. Oval, 2 a by 2f. Acacia wood frame. This miniature almost exactly resembles the Houbraken engraving dated 1 741, and it has been suggested, with some degree of probability, that it was prepared in order to send to Houbraken, in Amsterdam, that from it he might engrave his plate. Such a course was often pursued with regard to original works. It was very possibly painted by Bernard Lens the younger. It is not an exact copy of the Nuneham portrait, which purports to be an absolute copy of the lost Onslow portrait. In costume the two are identical, but in expression of countenance they are not, although the miniature is identical with the engraving. It came from the collection of Mr W. S. Green of Exeter Mansions, Shaftesbury Avenue, and was purchased by its present owner in 1903. It may of course be a copy by a miniature painter, from the Houbraken engraving ; especially as the colour of the costume differs from that of the Nuneham portrait, where the coat is black while in the miniature it is blue ; but it is suggested that the first suggestion is more likely to be the correct one. Artist unknown. Lent by Dr Williamson. Three-quarter face to the left. Costume, black buttoned vest, black gown, square white collar with broad lace border tied with strings and showing the two tassels below. Long fair hair, very pallid counten- ance, brown background. Oval, if by 2 J. Metal frame. This portrait came from the Goddard family, who had received it in direct descent through Mrs Goddard (born Elizabeth Woodcock), from Milton's second wife, Catherine Woodcock, the daughter of Captain Woodcock of Hackney whom the poet married on November 12th, 1656, and to whom he is said to have given this portrait. Mrs Milton died in February, 1658, and the portrait was given by her to her niece, from whom it came to its late owners. 32 CATALOGUE OF THE Artist UNKNOWN. Lent by Dr Williamson. Three-quarter face slightly to the right. Black buttoned vest, black gown, plain white collar tied with strings and showing the strings and the two tassels, long brown hair, background dark blue. Oval, 2\ by 2f . Metal frame. This is identical with the engraving by George Vertue dated 1725. It was originally in the possession of Charles Kean who regarded it as an early 18th century copy and who framed it, together with two similar copies of engravings representing Shakespeare and Jonson, which he obtained at the same time. Artist unknown, probably Essex. Lent by J. W. White- head, Esq. Enamel. The Onslow portrait. Inscribed: "J. Milton ann aetatis (not very clearly written) suse 20 .C. J fecit 1627." H. 4. W. 3. Black spotted vest, boyish face. This is a curious enamel because it ascribes to C. Janssen the Onslow portrait which he is not supposed to have painted, and has confused it with the early portrait which he did paint. The Onslow portrait was of Milton when 21. This states when 20, and the words anno or aetatis are written by some one not conversant with either word and are mingled up together in a strange confusion. It is a good example of the mistakes so constantly made with regard to the portraits of Milton. PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON 33 PORTRAITS [See note on p. 37.] Benjamin Van der Gucht. Lent by the Right Honourable Lewis Harcourt, M.P. Bust, slightly to the right, the head turned towards the spectator. Fair hair falling to neck, boyish expression, falling ruff, black dress, brown background. Canvas 28| by 24^. Oval. The following inscription is upon the back of the picture : This original picture of Milton I bought in the year 1729 or 30 and paid 20 guineas for it of Mr Cumberbatch, a gentleman of very good consideration in Chester, who was a relation and executor of the will of Milton's last wife who died a little while before that time. He told me it hung up in her chamber till her death and she used to say that her husband gave it to her to show her what he was in his youth beinp; drawn when he was about 11 years of age. Ar. Onslow. Mr Hawkins Brown (author of the poem De Animi Immortalitate) told me (8 Oct. 1753) that he knew this Mrs Milton, visited her often and well remembered this picture hanging in her chamber which she said was her husband. A. O. Compare this picture with that of Milton in his old age or in the print of it by White. N.B. The above I transcribed from the writings I found on the back of the original picture of Milton belonging to Lord Onslow when I made this copy for the Earl of Harcourt in November 1792. Benj. Van der Gucht. " Lord Onslow and Lord Harcourt were great friends and both fond of art. They made an agreement towards the end of the last century to exchange copies of two pictures i a Milton, 2. Pope by Kneller, the latter belonging to Lord Harcourt. The faithful copies were made and exchanged. Since that date the original Onslow picture has been lost and no search .through every gallery and known locality has ever been able to trace it, and therefore Lord Harcourt claimed to w. 3 34 CATALOGUE OF THE possess the only known copy from the picture and the next best thing to the original, which Lord Onslow had never before allowed to be copied." This is from an inscription at Clandon. This picture was exhibited at the Oxford Exhibition of Historical Portraits in 1905, No. 115, and was illustrated in the catalogue. There is an early edition of Milton at Clandon bearing on the fly-leaf a statement very similar to the one on the Nuneham portrait. Artist probably FAITHORNE. The Bayfordbury picture. Lent by H. Clinton Baker, Esq. Crayon drawing, ioh inches by 8| inches. See illustration, p. 9. Artist unknown. Lent by Christ's College, Cambridge. Oil painting on canvas. Boyish face, long hair, lace collar, black coat. Nothing is known of the history of this portrait save that it was purchased in the middle of the 19th century by the Rev. J. Hildyard, Rector of Ingoldsby and at one time Fellow and Tutor of the College, as a portrait of Milton as a young man. It has always borne that name and is merely accepted as a possible representation of the poet in his youth. With legend: "Iohannes Milton, aetatis XXI, 1629." Artist unknown. Lent by Arthur E. Shipley, Esq., F.R.S. Oil painting on an elaborately constructed mahogany panel. Measure- ments over all 2 ft. n in. by 2 ft. 5 in. Boyish face, black coat, white tie, long hair, white vest revealed in front. This picture came from Miss Elizabeth Rider (or Ryther) of the White House, Kirby Wiske, Yorkshire, the house in which the famous Roger Ascham was born, and (or a long time hung in the room in which the great scholar first saw the light. Miss Rider's statement respecting it is as follows : " In Cromwell's days, when Milton was the secretary of the Protector, my ancestor Sir John Ryther of Rider Hall (or Ryder), was one of the gentlemen of the court and a personal friend of the poet. I believe that it was by his desire that the portrait was painted but whether he had it painted or purchased it directly afterwards I do not know, but it has always been regarded by the family as an authentic portrait." It was purchased by the owner on the death of Miss Rider, through Mr John Rigby of Altrincham. Milton as a young man. The oil painting in the Hall of Christ's College, Cambridge. See under Portraits. PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON 35 Mary Beale. Lent by Lord Sackville. Bust looking to the right, brown dress, open collar, long reddish hair. Canvas 19 inches by 15 inches. Jonathan Richardson. Lent by Lord Sackville. Open collar, yellowish open vest, cloak held by left hand. Canvas 37 inches by 28 inches. Possibly De Wit. Lent by Lord Sackville. Representation in grisaille, of a bust of Milton standing in a niche, with floral ornamentation below. The poet wears the " Faithorne " collar with tassels. Canvas 7 feet 1 inch by 4 feet 10 inches. Artist unknown. Lent by Mrs Morrison. Face to the right, long hair, plain white collar tied with cord and fastened by two tassels, black buttoned vest, black gown. Canvas 30^ by 24^ inches. The head is crowned with a wreath of laurel. Inscribed : " Joannis Miltoni," and having upon it the Milton arms in a shield. This is said to have been painted by Milton himself but there is no evidence whatever to support the assertion. The portrait resembles the Richardson etchings to a certain extent and the Faithorne engraving in costume but the features are very little like those of Milton and the expression far too smooth for his. It cannot be accepted as an original likeness of the poet and is probably a composition based upon the Richardson etchings. See Antiquarian Magazine, vol. II. 1882, page 1. ARTIST UNKNOWN. Lent by Lord Leconfield. 3— 2 36 CATALOGUE OF THE Artist unknown. Lent by Dr Hill, some time Master of Downing College. Portrait of Milton, aetat 31, from the collection of Mr Peed of Canterbury, a collector of Miltoniana who died about 1820. CORNELIS JANSSEN. Lent by J. Passmore Edwards, Esq. Portrait of Milton at the age of 10; see pages 2 and 121, and The Times of 3 June, 1908. ROBERT Walker. Lent by Rev. C. P. Jones, of Buntingford. Van DER Plas. Lent by the Trustees of the National Portrait Gallery, by permission of the Treasury. ARTIST UNKNOWN. Lent by Major Galton of Hadzor. Artist unknown. Lent by E. Garnett, Esq., of Horsforth. Artist unknown. Photograph of the portrait in the Dyce collection at the Victoria and Albei t Museum, inscribed : " John Milton, Esq. Done after the life 1658, aet. 50." The original is said to have come down in the family of Bargrave, Chaplain to Charles I, and the portrait is evidently that of Milton, and has a close resemblance to the Faithorne engraving, from which it is probably derived. Samuel Cooper. Photograph of the miniature in the Victoria and Albert Museum. The miniature is certainly the work of Cooper, but it cannot be accepted as a portrait of Milton. PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON Artist unknown. Lent by Mr W. Webber. This has been called a portrait of Milton from a slight resemblance it bears to the Onslow portrait, but it cannot be accepted as an authentic likeness. N.B. The author of this catalogue can only accept as genuine contem- porary portraits of Milton, the Passmore Edwards portrait, the Onslow portrait, and the Bayfordbury drawing, although he is disposed to accept the Woodcock miniature as a contemporary work, and there is no doubt that the Vertue drawing, although not ad vivum, has high claim to be considered an authentic likeness of the poet, and one closely resembling the Bayfordbury portrait. He is disposed to think that the Dyce portrait is early and important, but not a con- temporary portrait, while all the others must be considered as unauthentic, or as compositions derived from engravings, or from the imagination of the respective artists. The Hobart drawing, generally accepted as a contemporary portrait, and the work of Faithorne, has not been lent to the Exhibition. It has therefore been impossible to compare it with the Bayfordbury drawing, as was desired, and to decide upon its merits. It is, however, a very important drawing, although there are diverse opinions as to its being the work of Faithorne, and it probably ranks next in position to the Bayfordbury drawing. Closer examination of it may perhaps result in its receiving an even higher position than is thus stated, and it may eventually be decided that it is the more trustworthy of the two drawings, but at present, without the opportunity of comparison, the opinion of the author cannot be more definitely stated. It seems to be quite clear that the Richardson etchings, without the laurel wreath, are copied direct from the Bayfordbury drawing, which may, therefore, at one time have been in Richardson's possession. 33 CATALOGUE OF THE DRAWINGS Edward Bathurst. Wash and Indian ink drawing of Milton similar in style to Vertue's portrait of 1674 (see No. 54), enclosed in an oval of stone work, cut at the top and sides, and resting at the foot on a stone plinth inscribed "John Milton ob. 1674, JEt. 66. Edw d . Bathurst Fecit." H. 8. W. 51. P.H. 6. P.W. 5. Lent by Dr Williamson. George Vertue. Drawing on canvas in black and brown wash described on page 25. 7j inches by 6£ inches. Lent by Dr Williamson. J. B. Cipriani. In the Fitzwilliam Museum (Portfolio 505) is the original drawing for engraving 178. It was presented to the Right Hon. Arthur Onslow by Mr Thomas Hollis, and by' Mr (afterwards Lord) Onslow given to Lord Fitzwilliam, "at Richmond on Thursday, 25 Feb. 1790." The inscription upon it records that it was " drawn from a bust in plaister, modelled from, and big as life," differing from the inscription on the print by the addition of the words in italics. The inscription also includes a sentence from Petrarch : Che trae buoni del sepolcro e in vita il scriba, and on the drawing itself, which is in chalk, is the Hollis motto : By Deeds of Peace. The drawing is a very beautiful one. PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON 39 ENGRAVINGS, MEZZOTINTS, ETCHINGS AND LITHOGRAPHS N.B. The numbers in brackets refer to the list prepared by J. F. Marsh in May, i860, for his article on the Portraits of Milton for the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire; see Vol. XII. page 135. The omission of these numbers in brackets denotes that the prints were unknown to Marsh and discovered since the date of his article. In the sizes of the prints the height is given first, H. signifying the entire height or height of plate, P. H. portrait height, W. width, P.W. portrait width. Engravings derived from Janssen's Portrait 1. J. B. Cipriani, engraver. Half length in oval, f face to the right. Short hair, striped doublet, buttoned in front and ornamented at shoulders, white stiffened lace collar showing loops of cord and tassels at throat. The oval is surrounded by a wreath of rose buds and leaves. Inscribed : John Milton. Drawn and etched mdcclx by I. B. Cipriani a Tvscan from a pictvre painted by Cornelivs Iohnson mdcxviii now in the possession of Thomas Hollis of Lincoln's Inne F.R. and A.S.S. When I was yet a child no childish play To me was pleasing all my mind was set Seriovs to learn and know and thence to do What might be pvblic good my self I thovght Born to that end born to promote all trvth All righteovs things. Parad. Reg. H. 1 of. P.H. 6. W. 6|. P.W. 4§. B.M. Below the portrait is the Hollis Cap of Liberty. (1). Mentioned by Bromley. 2. It is also known on green paper. B.M. CATALOGUE OF THE Cornelius Jansen pinxit. W. N. Gardiner, sculpt. Nearly full face. Short hair parted right and left, stiff lace collar, striped tightly fitting buttoned doublet. Inscribed : John Milton. MtaX 10. From an Original Picture in the Collection of Thos. Brand Hollis, Esq., near the Hyde, Essex. Published, June 4, 1794, by John and Josiah Boydell and George Nicol. H. ioi. P.H. 4J. W. 71. P.W. 3. B.M. This appeared in Boydell's Milton, 3 vols, royal folio. (2). ANON, engraver. Line engraving in an oval, representing the head and bust only, similar to the last. At the foot of the oval are printed the words "John Milton at the age of ten." H. 2f. P.H. 2 i. W. 2. P.W. if. Edward Radclyffe, engraver. A line engraving forming one of the illustrations to the first volume of Masson's Life of Milton. Inscribed " Milton ^Etat 10. After a photograph from the original picture in the possession of Edgar Disney of the Hyde, Ingatestone, Essex. London. Published by Macmillan & Co. 1874." (3). B.M. ANON, engraver. Engraving of a boy's portrait, almost in outline. Buttoned vest, rich pendant lace collar. Inscribed. Portrait described in Gent. Mag. for Sept. 1787, p. 759. H. 7^. W. 4 f. (4). PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON 41 This was used to illustrate a letter signed Z. Z. dated from Oxford and sending the drawing from which this was engraved. The correspondent stated that the drawing had at the top "AO 1623 Mtat suae 12" and that in the hands of the figure was a book with " Homer's Iliad " on the leaves. Engravings after the Onslow Portrait 7. Granger refers to a print differing only from (6) in the inscription. Bromley also mentions it, but Marsh did not see any copy of it. Stated to be inscribed as follows: "Joannes Milton. /Etat. 21. Vertue, sc. Ex pictura archetypa quae penes est praehonorabilem Arthurum Onslow, Arm. Vertue sc. 1831." It is a quarto print. (5). 8. G. Vertue, sculpt. 1731. Half-length in oval. Three-quarter face to the right. Hair fairly long, doublet buttoned in front and ornamented at the shoulders, white lace ruff. The oval is in a rectangular frame which cuts the curve at the sides and top. At the top is a scroll ornament with leaves and flowers. On the edge of the frame at the foot is a ribbon bearing the words " Ioannes Milton." Below the frame is a stone shelf with the heads of Homer and Virgil : in the centre is a medallion with a single headed eagle ; hanging from the shelf on either side below this medallion is a ribbon with the inscription "^Etatis XXI." Below the shelf is inscribed : Nascuntur Poetae, non hunt. H. gf . P.H. 4£. W. 6£. P.W. 4. (6). B.M. Two examples. Published in Bentley's edition of Paradise Lost. 4to. London, 1732. Mentioned by Bromley. 9. A proof before letters is in the B.M. Cracherode collection, signed and dated at the side. 1 42 CATALOGUE OF THE 10. ANON, but clearly the same plate as (6) with altered inscription. Half length in oval. Three-quarter face to the right. Hair fairly long, doublet buttoned in front and ornamented at the shoulders, white lace ruff. The oval is in a rectangular frame which cuts the curve at the sides and top. At the top is a scroll ornament with leaves and flowers. On the edge of the frame at the foot is a ribbon bearing the words " Ioannes Milton." Below the frame is a stone shelf with the head of Homer on it and the head of Virgil : in the centre is a medallion with a single headed eagle ; hanging from the shelf on either side below this medallion is a ribbon with the words "^Etatis suae 21." Below the shelf is inscribed: Greecia Maeonidem jadet sibi Roma Maronem Anglia Miltonum jactat titrique parent. Selvaggi. H. 8f. P.H. 4 f. W. 6. P.W. 4. 11 and 12. Another State. There is a print from the same plate as (6) with Dryden's lines sub- stituted for the "Nascuntur" etc., and the date badly altered from 1 731 to 1747. It is prefixed to Newton's edition of Paradise Lost, 2 vols, quarto. London, 1 749. (7). There are two varieties of this, one being without the stone rectangular frame and without the date. 13. G. Vertue, sculpt. Half length in oval, with slight scroll ornament above. Three-quarter face to the right. Hair fairly long. Doublet buttoned down the front and ornamented at the shoulders with lace ruff. Inscribed on a riband below the oval : Ioannes Milton ^Etatis Suae. 21. H. 6|. P.H. 3 f . W. 4. P.W. 3J. (8). B.M. Published in Newton's edition of Paradise Regained. 8vo. London, 1773. Mentioned by Bromley. 14. J. HOUBRAKEN, sculps. Amst. 1 741. Half length in oval. Three-quarter face to the left. Hair fairly long. Doublet buttoned down front and ornamented at shoulders, white lace ruff. Stone frame to portrait inscribed "John Milton." Below PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON 43 is a book with a lyre, a serpent with an apple in its mouth, a branch with leaves and fruit and a roll of paper. Inscribed: "In the collection of the Right Hon: Arthur Onslow Esq r Speaker of the House of Commons. Impensis I. and P. Knapton, Londini, 174." H. 15. P.H. 7. W. 9 £. P.W. 6\. (9). B.M. One of the Series of folio plates known as Houbraken's heads. Mentioned by Bromley. For the original copperplate see page 153. 15. The same print. Modern impression from the existing copperplate. B.M. 16. Another State. Portrait similar to the last within a rectangle, on the top of which are the words "Ms. Conv. Lex. No. 429," and below the rectangle " Stahlstich von Karl Meyer in Nurnburg," and the name " Milton " within an engraved tablet and above it the words "Inst. Bibl. Excudt." H. 7. P.H. 4 f. W. 3 f. 17. A Lithograph. Lithograph portrait similar to the last, but rougher and coarser in execution and inscribed : " Imp. litho de Melle Formentin rue St Andre des Arcs, No. 59." "J. Milton, Ulustre Poete Anglais." H. 9. P.H. 7. W. 6. 18. Andrew Miller fecit. Dublin, 1744. This is a copy of (9) in mezzotint, including the ornaments, but reversed and inscribed as above and also "Joannes Milton yEtatis XXI." On the pedestal is the motto " Nascuntur " etc. Plate size 13^ by 10. O.D.H. 7. W. 6. Chaloner Smith 931. (10). 19. J. B. Cipriani, engraver. Half length in oval. Three-quarter face to the right. Hair fairly long, doublet buttoned in front and ornamented at shoulders, white lace ruff. Oval is surrounded by a wreath of laurel. Below is the inscription : John Milton Drawn and etched mdcclx by J. B. Cipriani a Tvscan at the desire of Thomas Hollis F.R. and A.S.S. from a pictvre in the collection of the 44 CATALOGUE OF THE Right Hon. Arthur Onslow Speaker of the Commons Hovse of Parliament. How soon hath Time the svttle theef of yovth Stoln on his wing my one and twentieth yeer My hasting dayes flie on with fvll career Bvt my late spring no bvd or blossom shew'th Perhaps my semblance might deceive the trvth That I to manhood am arriv'd so near And inward ripeness doth mvch less appear That som more timely-happy spirits indv'th Yet be it less or more or soon or slow It shall be still in strictest measvre eev'n To that same lot however mean or high Toward which time leads me and the will of heav'n All is if I have grace to vse it so As ever in my great Task Masters eye. H. iof. P.H. 6i. W. 7. P.W. 41. (11). B.M. One of the Series mentioned in Hollis' Memoirs. 20. A Proof. A proof of above plate, before letters. 21. Impression on green paper. Very rare. B.M. 22. Anon, engraver. Half length in oval. Three-quarter face to the right. Hair fairly long. Doublet with ornamentation at fastening and shoulders, white ruff. Inscribed above portrait John Milton. Under the portrait is written in ink "died 1674, aged 68." H. 2 X V P.H. 2. W. if. 23. Goldar, sculpt. Half length in oval. Three-quarter face to the right. Hair fairly long. Doublet buttoned in front and ornamented at shoulders, white lace ruff. Oval medallion in rectangular frame, above which is inscribed : " London ; Engrav'd for Harrison's Editions of Rapin. John Milton" and below " In the Collection of the R' Hon ble Arthur Onslow Esq r Published as the Act directs, May 28 1785." H. 1 1 A. P.H. 6&. W. 7 |. P.W. 5 A- (12). PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON 45 24. Anon, engraver. Half length in oval. Three-quarter face to the left. Hair fairly long. Doublet buttoned down front and ornamented at shoulders, white lace ruff. Stone frame to portrait inscribed : John Milton. Inscribed at the top " For the London Magazine " and at the foot "Published by R. Baldwin at the Rose in Pater Noster Row 1752." H. 7 f P.H. 3 f W. 4 |. P.W. 3t V (13). B.M. For the London Magazine. 25. ANON, engraver. An oval representing masonry of six voussoirs, with segments cut off at top, bottom and sides. No plinth. " John Milton " at foot. Plate size 4A by 3$. (14). This was issued in the fifth volume of the British Biography published by Baldwin, 7 vols., 8vo. London, 1766 — 72. 26. Anon, engraver. Oval in slightly ornamented frame, in the same plate with Algernon Sidney, John Hampden and Andrew Marvel, the frames being con- nected with interlacing ornament. Size of each frame 2\ by if. (15). 27. I. June, sculpt. Plain oval in same plate with Ben Jonson, Robert Boyle and John Locke. 2 by if. (16). 28. W. N. Gardiner, sculpt. Three-quarter face to the right. Long hair, white ruff, buttoned doublet Inscribed : John Milton ^Etat 21, From the original Picture in the Possession of Lord Onslow at Clandon in Surry. 46 CATALOGUE OF THE purchased from the Executor of Milton's Widow by Arthur Onslow Esq r speaker of the House of Commons, as certified in his own hand writing at the back of the Picture. Publish'd June 4, 1794, by Iohn and Josiah Boydell and George Nicol. H. 10J. P.H. 6. W. 7§. P.W. 4 |. (17). B.M. This appears in Boydell's Milton. 29. WOOLNOTH, sculpt. Inscribed: "John Milton ^tat XXI." Marsh does not give any sizes for this plate. The portrait sizes are 3 X2f (18). 30. Anon, engraver. Inscribed : Cornelius Jansen. W. C. Edwards. J. Yates, printer. London, John Macrone, St James's Square, and E. Graves, King William St., Strand. (19). H. 8|. P.H. 3J. W. 5. P.W. 3. B.M. This, Marsh states, appeared in Macrone's edition, edited by Sir Egerton Brydges. No sizes are given and the picture is quite wrongly assigned to Cornelius Janssen. 31. Cornelius Jansen. W. C. Edwards. Line engraving after the Onslow portrait, representing Milton at the age of twenty-one, with the usual white lace ruff and buttoned doublet. Beneath is a facsimile of the signature and date and below that the inscription : JEX. XXI. H. 7 |. W. 4f . This is a vignette. 32. There is a proof known of this. 33 and 34. Edward Radclyffe, engraver. Inscribed: "Milton aetat 21. After Vertue's engraving in 1731, from the original picture, then in the possession of the Right Hon. Speaker Onslow." This appears in Masson's Life of Milton, in two different plates. (33) P-H. $h P.W. 3. (34) A vignette P.H. 2, P.W. 2. (20). 35. There is a proof known of 34, engraved by C. H. Jeens. B.M. 36. On a variety the inscription stops at "aetat 21." PORTRAITS OF JOHN MILTON 47 37. T. S. Engleheart, sc. Inscribed "John Milton, aged 21. London, Published by John W. Parker, West Strand." P.H. 3. P.W. 3. Marshall's Engraving 38. W. Marshall, sculpt. This is the portrait which appeared in Humphrey Moseley's original edition of Milton's Poems in 1645 (No. 254), and has the celebrated Greek epigram beneath it. In the background is an arcadian scene, and in the four corners outside the oval the four muses, Melpomene, Erato, Urania and Clio, with their names. The poet is within the oval, and has a lace bordered collar and lace bordered cuffs. The hair is long and there is a curtain at the back of the head. The inscription about the oval is : Ioannis Miltoni Angli Effigies Anno ^tatis viGess: Pri: Below the portrait is the Greek inscription in four lines, followed by the letters W. M. sculp. : A/J.a6el yeypd(p6a.i X eL P L T V v ^ e H L * V "kovo. ^aojs to-X ov, irpos ciSos avTO