i Gizeh Museum j Plate I THE « STRUGGLE OF THE NATIONS EGYPT, SYRIA, AND ASSYRIA BY G. MASl^ERO HON. D.C.I.. AND FKI.I.OW Ol qUKKN's COI.I.KliK, OXKOKll MKMBKIt 01- THE INSTITUTK, AND KSSOK AT TirK COM.KOE Ol KRANCK EDITED BY A. H. SAYCE TRANSLATED HV M. L. McCU RK MKMBRR OK TH K COMMITTKK OK TIIK. EGYPT KX I'LOK ATION Kl'NIl WITH MAP, THREE COLOUUED PLATES, AND OVER 400 ILLUSTHATIOXS. LONDON SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDtJK NORTHUMBERLAND AVENUE, W.C. 18% » [published under the direction of the general literature committee.] EDITOR'S PREFACE. It is my pleasant lot to introduce to the English reader another volume of Professor Maspero's important work. It is no longer the Dawn of Civiliza- tion in which we find ourselves, but the full light of an advanced culture. The nations of the ancient East are no longer each pursuing an isolated existence, and separately developing the seeds of civilization and culture on the banks of the Euphrates and the Nile. Asia and Africa have met in mortal combat. Babylonia has carried its empire to the liontiers of Egypt, and Egypt itself has been held in bondage by the Hyksos strangers from Asia. In return, Egypt has driven back the wave of invasion to the borders of Mesopotamia, has substituted an empire of its own in Syria for that of the Babylonians, and has forced the Babylonian king to treat with its Pharaoh on equal terms. In the track of war and diplomacy have come trade and commerce ; Western Asia is covered with roads, along which the merchant and the courier travel incessantly, and the whole civilised world of the Orient is knit together in a common literary culture and common commercial interests. The age of isolation has thus been succeeded by an age of intercourse, partly military and antagonistic, partly literary and peaceful. Professor Maspero paints for us this age of intercourse, describes its rise and character, its decline and fall. For the unity of Eastern civilization was again shattered. The Hittites descended from the ranges of the Taurus upon the Egyptian province of Northern Syria, and cnt off the Semites of the west from those of the east. The Israelites poured over the Jordan out of Edom and Moab, and took possession of Canaan, while Babylonia itself, for so many centuries the ruling power of the Oriental world, had to make way for its upstart rival Assyria. The old imperial powers were exhausted and played out, and it needed time before the new forces which were to take their place could acquire sufficient strength for their work. As usual, Professor Maspero has been careful to embody in his history the IV EDITOR'S PREFACE. very latest discoveries and information. Notice, it will be found, has been taken even of the stela of Meneptah, disinterred last spring by Professor Petrie, on which the name of the Israelites is engraved. Other discoveries of the past year which relate to the period covered by the Dawn of Civilization must wait to be noticed until a new edition of that volume is called for. Thus, at Elephantine, I found last winter, on a granite boulder, an inscription of Khufuankh — whose sarcophagus of red granite is one of the most beautiful objects in the Gizeh Museum — which carries back the history of the island to the age of the pyramid-builders of the fourth dynasty. The boulder was subsequently concealed under the southern side of the city-wall, and «s fragments of inscribed papyrus coeval with the sixth dynasty have been discovered in the immediate neighbourhood, on one of which mention is made of " this domain " of Pepi II., it would seem that the town of Elephantine must have been founded between the period of the fourth dynasty and that of the sixth. Manetho is therefore justified in making the fifth and sixth dynasties of Elephantine origin. It is in Babylonia, however, that the most startling discoveries have been made. At Telle, M. de Sarzec has found a library of more than thirty thousand tablets, all neatly arranged, piled in order one on the other, and belonging to the age of Gudea (b.c. 2700). Many more tablets of an early date have been unearthed at Abu-Habba (Sippara) and Jokha (Isin) by Dr. Scheil, working for the Turkish government. But the most important finds have been at Niffer, the ancient ISTfppur, in Northern Babylonia, where the American ex- pedition has at last brought to a close its long work of systematic excavation. Here Mr. Haynes has dug down to the very foundations of the great temple of El-lil, and the chief historical results of his labours have been published by Professor Hilprecht (in The Bahjlonian Exf edition of the University of Pennsylvania, vol. i. pt. 2, 1896). About midway between the summit and the bottom of the mound, Mr. Haynes laid bare a pavement constructed of huge bricks stamped with the names of Sargon of Akkad and his son Naram-Sin. He found also the ancient wall of the city, which had been built by Naratn-Sin, 13"75 metres wide. The debris of ruined buildings which lies below the pavement of Sargon is as much as 9"25 metres in deptli, while that above it, the topmost stratum of which brings us down to the Christian era, is only 11 metres in height. We may form some idea from this of the enormous age to which the history of Babylonian culture and writing reaches back. In fact, Professor Hilprecht quotes with approval Mr. Haynes's words: "We must cease to apply the adjective ' earliest ' to the time of Sargon, or to any age or epoch within a EDITOR'S PBEFACE. V thousand years of his advanced civilization." "The golden age of Babylonian history seems to include the reign of Sargon and of Ur-Gur." Many of the inscriptions which belong to this remote age of human culture have been published by Professor Hilprecht. Among them is a long inscription, in 132 lines, engraved on multitudes of large stone vases presented to the temple of El-lil by a certain Lugal-zaggisi. Lugal-zaggisi was the son of Ukus, the ][)atesi or high priest of the " Land of the Bow," as i\resopotamia, with its Bedawin inhabitants, was called. He not only conquered Babylonia, then known as Kengi, " the land of canals and reeds," but founded an empire which extended from the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean. This was centuries before Sargon of Akkad followed in his footsteps. Erech became the capital of Lugal-zaggisi's empire, and doubtless received at this time its Sumerian title of " the city " par excellence. For a long while previously there had been war between Babylonia and the " Land of the Bow," whose rulers seem to have established themselves in tlie city of Kis. At one time we find the Babylonian prince En-sag(sag)-ana capturing Kis and its king; at another time it is a king of Kis who makes offerings to the god of Nippur, in gratitude for his victories. To this period belongs the famous " Stela of the Vultures " found at Tello, on which is depicted the victory of E-dingir-ana-gin, the King of Lagas (Tello), over the Semitic hordes of the Land of the Bow. It may be noted that the recent discoveries have shown how correct Professor Maspero has been in assigning the kings of Lagas to a period earlier than that of Sargon of Akkad. Professor Hilprecht would place E-dingir-ana-gin after Lugal-zaggisi, and see in the Stela of the Vultures a monument of the revenge taken by the Sumerian rulers of Lagas for the conquest of the country by the inhabitants of the north. But it is equally possible that it marks the successful reaction of Chaldsea against the power established by Lugal-zaggisi. However this may be, the dynasty of Lagas (to which Professor Hilprecht has lately added a new king, En-Khegal) reigned in peace for some time, and belonged to the same age as the first dynasty of Ur. This was founded by a certain Lugal-kigub- nidudu, whose inscriptions have been found at Niffer. The dynasty whicli arose at Ur in later days (cir. B.C. 2700), under Ur-Gur and Dungi, which has hitherto been known as " the first dynasty of Ur," is thus dethroned from its position, and becomes the second. The succeeding dynasty, which also made Ur its capital, and whose kings, Lie-Sin, Pur-Sin IL, and Gimil-Sin, were the immediate predecessors of the first dynsisty of Babylon (to which Khammurabi belonged), must henceforth be termed the third. Among the latest acquisitions from Tello are the seals of tiie patesi, EDITORS PREFACE. Lugal-usumgal, which finally remove all doubt as to the identity of " Sargani, king of the city," with the famous Sargon of Akkad. The historical accuracy of Sargon's annals, moreover, have been fully vindicated. Not only have the American excavators found the contemporary monuments of him and his son Naram-Sin, but also tablets dated in the years of his campaigns against " the land of the Amorites." lu short, Sargon of Akkad, so lately spoken of as " a half-mythical" personage, has now emerged into the full glare of authentic history. That the native chronologists had sufficient material for reconstructing the past history of their couiitry, is also now clear. The early Babylonian contract-tablets are dated by events which officially distinguished the several years of a king's reign, and tablets have been discovered compiled at the close of a reign which give year by year the events which thus characterised them. One of these tablets, for example, from the excavations at Niffer, begins with the words: (1) "The year when Pur-Sin (II.) becomes king. (2) The year when Pur-Sin the king conquers Urbilium," and ends with "the year when Gimil-Sin becomes King of Ur, and conquers the land of Zabsali" in the Lebanon. Of special interest to the biblical student are the discoveries made by Mr. Pinches among some of the Babylonian tablets which have recently been acquired by the British Museum. Four of them relate to no less a personage than Kudur-Laghghamar or Chedor-laomer, " King of Elam," as well as to Eri-Aku or Arioch, King of Larsa, and his son Dur-makh-ilani ; to Tudghula or Tid'al, the son of Gazza[ni], and to their war against Babylon in the time of Khammu[rabi]. In one of the texts the question is asked, " Who is the son of a king's daughter who has sat on the throne of royalty ? Uur-makh-ilani, the son of Eri-Aku, the son of the lady Kur . . . has sat on the throne of royalty," from which it may perhaps be inferred that Eii-Aku was the son of Kudur- Laghghamar's daughter ; and in another we read, " Who is Kudur-Laghghamar, the doer of mischief? He has gathered together the Umman Manda, has devastated the land of Bel (Babylonia), and [has marched] at their side." The Ummau Manda were the " Barbarian Hordes " of the Kurdish mountains, on the northern frontier of Elam, and the name corresponds with that of the Goyyim or " nations " in the fourteenth chapter of Genesis. We here see Kudur-Laghghamar acting as their suzerain lord. Unfortunately, all four tablets are in a shockingly broken condition, and it is therefore difficult to discover in them a continuous sense, or to determine their precise nature. They have, however, just been supplemented by further discoveries made by Dr. Scheil at Constantinople. Among t!ie tablets preserved there, he has EDITOR'S PREFACE. Vll found letters from Khatnmurabi to his vassal Sin-idinuam of Larsa, from which we leara that Sin-idinnam had been dethroned by the Elamites Kudur-Mabug and Eri-Aku, and had fled for refuge to the court of Khammurabi at Babylon. In the war which subsequently broke out between Khammurabi uiid Kudur- Laghghamar, the King of Elam (who, it would seem, exercised suzerainty over Babylonia for seven years), Sin-idinnam gave material assistance to tiie Babylonian monarch, and Khammurabi accordingly bestowed presents upon him as a "recompense for his valour on the day of the overthrow of Kudur- Laghghamar." I must not conclude this Preface without referring to a fine scarab — found in the rubbish-mounds of the ancient city of Kom Ombos, in Upper Egypt — which bears upon it the name of Sutkhu-Apopi. It shows us that the author of the story of the Expulsion of the Hyksos, in calling the king Ra-Apopi, merely, like an orthodox Egyptian, substituted the name of the god of Heliopolis for that of the foreign deity. Equally interesting are the scarabs brought to light by Professor Flinders Petrie, on which a liitherto unknown Ya'aqob-hal or Jacob-el receives the titles of a Pharaoh. A. H. SAYCE. TRANSLATORS PREFACE. In presentino; to the public Professor Maspero's latest volume, the " Premieres Mel(^es des Peuples," in its English form, I have little to add to the words I prefixed to the first volume of the series. I have in tlie present, as in the previous work, preserved Professor Maspero's spelling of the Egyptian proper names, inserting in the Index the forms in general use among English Egyptologists. With regard to such Syrian personal and place names as occnr in the Bible, I have followed the spelling of the Revised Version ; though here, as in the Assyrian portion of the work, the forms represented on the monuments, whether cuneiform texts, Tel el-Amarna tablets, or Egyptian hieroglyphs, are also given. While this translation was passing through the press, fresh discoveries were made which have thrown further light upon a few points dealt with in the text, and in these cases the Editor or Translator has ventured to add such short notes as seemed needful. As an example of these, I may call attention to the notes on p. 29, in which Professor Hommel's unhesitating identification of Khammnrabi with the Amraphel of Genesis xiv. 1 is given, and also the true reading of Rim-Sin as determined by Mr. Pinches. I have not referred in the notes to Professor Hommel's letter in the Academy of October 17th last, dealing with the word " Arpachshad," which he considers to be an Egypticised form of the territorial name " Ur Kasdim," or "Ur of the Chaldees." This important elucidation of an ethnological term occurring in Genesis x., in a passage ascribed by recent critics to the time of the Exile, will doubtless receive the consideration it merits. M. L IMcCLURE. London, November 14, 189G. KOIiDKK OK TIIK Fl'NKRAI. PALL OK yl EEX IshlKIIOlllt. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. THE FIRST CHALD/EAN EMPIRE AND THE HYKSOS IN EGYPT. Syria : The Part Played by it in the Asciest AVori-d— P>abylon and the First Chaldean Empire — The Dominion of the Hyksos : Ahmosis ... A CHAPTEK II. SYRIA AT THE BEGINNING OF THE EGYPTIAN CONQUEST. Nineveh and the First Coss.ean Kings — The Peoples ok Syria, theii: 'J'owns, theih Civilization, their Religion — Pikenicia ... ... ... ill CHAPTER III. THE EIGHTEENTH THEBAN DYNASTY. ThCtmosis I. AND his Army— HATSHOPsiTu AND Thlt.mosis III.: The Organisa- tion OF THE Syrian Provinces — AmenOthks III. : The Boval Worshiiteks of Atonu ... ... ... • . ... ... 2"9 CHAPTER IV. THE REACTION AGAINST EGYPT. The XIX"" Dynasty : HarmhabI — The Hittite Empire in Syria and in Asia Minor — Seti 1. and Ramses II. — The People of the Sea: Minephtah and the Israelite E.xodus ... ... ... ... ;!41 xii CONTENTS. CHAPTER V. THE CLOSE OF THE THEBAN EMPIRE. Eamses III. — The Thebas City under the Ramessides — Manners and Customs — Population — The Predominance of Amon and his High Priests CHAPTER VI. THE RISE OF THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE. Phcenicia and the Northern Nations after the Death of Eamses III. — The First Assyrian Empire : Tiglath-pileser I. — The Aram«ans and the Khati ... CHAPTER VII. THE HEBREWS AND THE PHILISTINES-DAMASCUS. The Israelites in the Land of Canaan : The Judge.s — The Philistines and the Hebrew Kingdom— Saul, David, Solomon, the Defection of the Ten Tribes — The XXP' Egyptian Dynasty — Sheshonq — Damascus ... G73 Index ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 789 THE FIRST CHALDiEAN EMPIRE AND THE HYKSOS IN EGYPT. SYRIA : THE PART PLAYED BY IT IN THE HISTORY OF THE ANCIENT WORLD — BABYLON AND THE FIRST CHALD;EAN EMPIRE — THE DOMINION OF THE HYKSOS: AHMOSIS. Syria, owing to its geographical position, coiulemned to he mhject to neighbonring powers — Lebanon, Anti-Lebanon, the valley of the Orontes and of Uie Litany, and surrounding regions: the northern table-laiul, the country about Damascus, the Mediterranean coast, the Jordan and the Dead Sea — Civilization and primitive inhabitants, Semites and Asiatics: the almost entire absence of Egyptian influence, the predominance of that of Chaldtea. Babylon, its ruins and its environs — It extends its ride over Mesopotamia; its earliest dynasty ami its struggle with Centred Chaldxa — Elam, its geographical position, its peoples : Kuiur-Ndkhunta conquers Larsam — Rimsin (Eri-Aku) ; KJiammurabi founds the first Babylonian empire ; his victories, his buildings, his canals — The Elamites in Syria : Kudur- lugamar — Syria recognizes the authority of Hammurabi and his successors. The HyksCs conqwr Egypt at the end of tlve XIV"' dynasty; the founding of Avaris — Uncertainty both of ancients and moderns with regard to the origin of the Hyke6s : probability of their being the Khati — Tlixir kings adopt the manners and civilization of the Egyptians : the monuments of Khiani and of Apophis I. and II. — The XV" dynasty. Semitic incua-sions following the Hyks6s — The migration of the Phoenicians and the Israelites into Syria : Terah, Abraham and his sojourn in the laml of Canaan — Isaac, Jacob, Joseph: the Israelites go dotun into Egypt and settle in the land of Goshen. ( 2 ) Tliehes revolts against the Syksos : popular traditions as to the origin of the war, the romance of Apophis and SaqnUnri — The Tliehan princesses and the last kings of the XVII''' dynasty: TiUdgni Kamosis, Ahmosis I. — The lords of El-Kdb, and the part they played dwing the war of independence — The taking of Avaris and the expulsion of the Hyksos. The reorganization of Egypt — Ahmosis I. and his Nubian 'wars, the reopening of the quarries of T4rah — Amenothes I. and his mother Nofrttari : the jewellery of Queen Ahhotpu — The wars of Amenothes I. , the apotheosis of Nofritari — The accession of ThMmosis I. and the re-generation of Egypt. A i A ^ THE ENAMELLEIJ GOLD NECKLACE OF QUEEX AHHOTPO IN THE GIZEU MUSEUM.' CHAPTER I. THE FIRST CHALD/EAN EMPIRE AND THE HYKSOS IN EGYPT. Syria : the part played by ancient world — Babylon of the Hyksus : Ahr md the first Chaldajan empire— The 1 nOME countries seem destined from their 0 origin to become the battle-fields of the contending nations which environ them. Into such regions, and to their cost, neighbour- ing peoples come from century to century to settle their quarrels and bring to an issue the questions of supremacy which disturb their little corner of the world. The nations around are eager for the possession of a country thus situated ; it is seized upon bit by bit, and in the strife dismembered and trodden underfoot : at best the only course open to its inhabitants is to join forces with one of its invaders, and while helping the intruder to overcome the rest, to secure for themselves a position of permanent servitude. Should some unlooked-for chance relieve them from the presence of their foreign lord, they will probably be quite incapable of profiting by the ' Drawn by Fauclier-Gudin, from a photograph by Emil Brugsch-Bey. The vignette, also by Faucher-Qudiu, from a photograph by Ddveria taken in 1864, represents the gilded mask of tlio coffin of Queen Ahhotpft I. Cf. p. 93, et seq., of the present volume. 4 THE FIRST CHALDEAN EMPIRE. respite whicli fortune puts in their way, or of making any effectual attempt to organize themselves in view of future attacks. They tend to become split up into numerous rival communities, of which even the pettiest will aim at autonomy, keeping up a perpetual frontier war for the sake of becoming possessed of or of retaining a glorious sovereignty over a few acres of corn in the plains, or some wooded ravines in the mountains. Year after year there will be scenes of bloody conflict, in which petty armies will fight petty battles on behalf of petty interests, but so fiercely, and with such furious animosity, that the country will suffer from the strife as much as, or even more than, from an invasion. There will be no truce to their struggles until they all fall under the sway of a foreign master, and, except in the interval between two conquests, they will have no national existence, their history being almost entirely merged in that of other nations. From remote antiquity Syria was in the condition just described, and thus destined to become subject to foreign rule. Chaldgea, Egypt, Assyria, and Persia presided in turn over its destinies, while Macedonia and the empires of the West were only waiting their opportunity to lay hold of it. By its position it formed a kind of meeting-place where most of the military nations of the ancient world were bound sooner or later to come violently into collision. Confined between the sea and the desert, Syria offers the only route of easy access to an army marching northwards from Africa into Asia, and all conquerors, whether attracted to Mesopotamia or to Egypt by the accumulated riches on the banks of the Euphrates or the Nile, were obliged to pass through it in order to reacli the object of their cupidity. It might, perhaps, have escaped this fatal consequence of its position, had the formation of the country permitted its tribes to mass themselves together, and oppose a compact body to the invading hosts ; but the range of mountains which forms its backbone subdivides it into isolated districts, and by thus restricting each tribe to a narrow existence maintained among them a mutual antagonism. The twin chains, the Lebanon and the Anti-Lebanon, which divide the country down the centre, are composed of the same kind of calcareous rocks and sandstone, while the same sort of reddish clay has been deposited on their slopes by the glaciers of the same geological period.^ Arid and bare on the northern side, they send out towards the south featureless monotonous ridges, furrowed here and ' Drake remarked in the Lebanon several varieties of limestone (Bueton-Dkake, Unexplored Syria, vol. i. pp. 90, 91), which have been carefully catalogued by Blanche and Lartet (Duo db LuYNES, Voyage d' exploration a la mer Morte, vol. iii. pp. 40, 41, 49-58). Above these strata, which belong to the Jurassic formation, come reddish sandstone, then beds of very hard yellowish limestone, and finally marl. The name Lebanon, in Assyrian Libnana, would appear to signify "the white mountain;" the Amorites called the Anti-Lebanon Saniru, Shenir, according to the Assyrian texts (Fr. Delitzsch, Wo lag das Paradies? p. 104) and the Hebrew books (Deut. iii. 9; 1 Chron. V. 23). 6 THE FIRST CHALDEAN EMPIRE. there by short narrow valleys, hollowed out in places into basins or funnel- shaped ravines, which are widened year by year by the down-rush of torrents. These ridges, as they proceed southwards, become clothed with verdure and offer a more varied outline, the ravines being more thickly wooded, and the summits less uniform in contour and colouring. Lebanon becomes white and ice-crowned in winter, but none of its peaks rises to the altitude of perpetual snows : the highest of them. Mount Timarun, reaches 10,526 feet, while only three others exceed 9000.^ Anti-Lebanon is, speaking generally, 1000 or 1300 feet lower than its neighbour : it becomes higher, however, towards the south, where the triple peak of Mount Hermon ^ rises to a height of 9184 feet. The Orontes and the Litany drain the intermediate space. The Orontes rising on the west side of the Anti-Lebanon, near the ruins of Baalbek,^ rushes northwards in such a violent manner, that the dwellers on its banks call it the rebel — Nahr el-Asi.^ About a third of the way towards its mouth it enters a depression, which ancient dykes help to transform into a lake ; it flows thence, almost parallel to the sea-coast, as far as the 36th degree of latitude. There it meets the last spurs of the Amanos, but, failing to cut its way through them, it turns abruptly to the west, and then to the south, falling into the Mediterranean after having received an increase to its volume from the waters of the Afrin.^ The Litany rises a short distance from the Orontes ; it flows at first through a wide and fertile plain, which soon contracts, however, and forces it into a channel between the spurs of the Lebanon and the Gralilsean hills." The water thence makes its way between two cliff's of 1 Borton-Drake, Unexplored Syria, vol. i. p. 88, attributed to it an altitude of 9175 English feet ; others estimate it at 10,539 feet. The mountains which exceed 3000 metres are Dahr el-Kozib, 3046 metres ; Jebel-Miskiyah, 3080 metres ; and Jebel-Makhmal or Makmal, 3040 metres (Elisee Eecltjs, Nouvelle Geographic universelle, vol. ix. pp. 693, 694). As a matter of fact, these heights are not yet determined with the accuracy desirable. " It was sometimes called in the plural, Hermonim, the Hermons (Ps. xlii. 6). ' Pliny, Natural History, Bk. V. xviii. : " Amnis Orontes, natus inter Libanum et Antilibanum, juxta Heliopolin." On the source of the Orontes, cf. Burton-Drake, Unexplored Syria, vol. i. pp. 58-66. * The Egyptians knew it in early times by the name of Afinrati, or Araunti (E. de Eouge, Le Poeme de Fen-ta-our, 1856, p. 8, whose opinion has since been adopted by all Egyptologists) ; it is mentioned in Assyrian inscriptions under the name of Arantu (Fr. Delitzsch, Wo lag das Paradies 1 p. 274). All are agreed in acknowledging that this name is not Semitic, and an Aryan origin is attributed to it, but without convincing proof; according to Strabo (xvi. ii. § 7, p. 750), it was originally called Tyjihon, and was only styled Orontes after a certain Orontes had built the first bridge across it. The name of Axios which it sometimes bears appears to have been given to it by Greek colonists, in memory of a river in Macedonia (Sozomen, History, vii. 15). This is probably the origin of the modern name of Asi, and the mesMing, rebellious river, which Arab tradition attaches to the latter term, probably comes from a popular etymology which likened Axios to Asi : the identification was all the easier since it justifies the epithet by the violence of its current (Pococke, Travels, French trans. 1777, vol. iii. pp. 414, 415). ^ The Afria is the Aprie of cuneiform inscriptions, at first confounded with one of the two rivers of Damascus, the Baradah (Finzi, Ricerche per h Studio dell' Antichita Assira, p. 284), the exact position of which was discovered by H. Rawlinson (G. Rawlinson, The Five Monarchies, vol. ii. p. 89). " The Litany was identified by Eeland {Palxstina ex monumenUs veteribus illustrata, vol. i. pp. 290, 291) with the river of the Lion, Aiovros Trorafids of Ptolemy (v. 15), commonly called Leontes : Strabo, who mentions the river, gives it no name at all (xvi. ii. § 24, p. 758). Eeland's hypothesis has been strenuously opposed by Poulain de Bossay (Essais de restitution et d' interpretation d'un VaSLE-SYBIA AND THE NORTHERN TABLE-LAND. 7 perpendicular rock, the ravine being in several places so narrow, that the branches of the trees on the opposite sides interlace, and an active man could readily leap across it. Near Yakhmur some detached rocks appear to have been arrested in their fall, and, leaning like flying buttresses against the mountain face, constitute a natural bridge over the torrent.^ The basins of the two rivers lie in one valley, extending eighty leagues in length, divided by an almost imperceptible watershed into two beds of unequal slope. The central part of the valley is given up to marshes. It is only towards the south that we find cornfields, vineyards, plantations of mulberry and olive trees, spread out over the plain, or disposed in terraces on the hillsides. Towards the north, the alluvial deposits of the Orontes have gradually formed a black and fertile soil, upon which grow luxuriant crops of cereals and other produce. Coele- Syria, after having generously nourished the Oriental empires which had preyed upon her, became one of the granaries of the Roman world, under the capable rule of the Caesars. Syria is surrounded on all sides by countries of varying aspect and soil. That to the north, flanked by the Amanos, is a gloomy mountainous region, with its greatest elevation on the seaboard : it slopes gradually towards the interior, spreading out into chalky table-lands, dotted over with bare and rounded hills, and seamed with tortuous valleys which open out to the Euphrates, the Orontes, or the desert. Vast, slightly undulating plains succeed the table-lands : the soil is dry and stony, the streams are few in number and contain but little water. The Sajur flows into tlie Euphrates,^ the Afrin and the Karasu when united yield their tribute to the Orontes,^ while the others for the most part pour their waters into enclosed basins. The Khalus of the Greeks sluggishly pursues its course southward, and after reluctantly leaving the gardens of Aleppo, finally loses itself on the borders of the desert in a small salt lake full of islets : * about halfway between the Khalus and the pimage de Scylax, pp. 39, 40), and it ia now acknowledged that the Lion Biver and the Litftny have nothing in common (Kiepeut, Uandbuch der Allen Geographic, p. 159, n. 2J. The Samaritan Chronicles published by Nuubauer call it the Nahar Litah (Jounial Asiatique, 1869, vol. ii. p. 442). The Anaatasi Papyrus, No. 1, pi. sx. 1. 8, pi. xxi. 1. 8, mentions a watercourse between Tyre and Sidon, -called the Nazana, which can only be the Nahr Kasimiyeh, that is to say, the lower stream of the Litany (Maspero, Notes sur diff^renU points de gnimmaire et d'hittoire, § 13, in the Melanges d'Archeblogie Egyptienne el Assyrienne, vol. i. pp. 140, 141). ' The gorges of the Litany are described by Van des Velde, Reise durch Syrien und Palattina, vol. i. p. 113; and the natural bridge at Yakhmur by Robinson, Later Biblical Researches, pp. 421, 423. * The Sajur is the Sagurra of the cuneiform texts (Fr. Delitzsch, TFo lag dot Parodies'} p. 183). ' For the Afrln, cf. p. 6 of this volume. The modem Karasu was called by the Assyrians Saluara, the River of Eels, and it preserved this name until the Arab period (Halevy, Rechcrches hibUques, § xii. p. 278 ; Saoiiav, Zur hislorisclien Geographic von Nordgyrien, in the Sitzuiigsherichte of the Academy of Science at litrlin, vol. xxi. pp. 329-336). * The Assyrian monuments have not yet given us the native name of this river ; Xonophon {Anabasis, vol. 1, iv. 9) calls it Khalus, and says that it was full of large edible fish. 8 TEE FIRST CHALDEAN EMPIRE. Euphrates a second salt lake receives the Nahr ed-Dahab, the "golden river.^" The climate is mild, and the temperature tolerably uniform. The sea-breeze which rises every afternoon tempers the summer heat : the cold in winter is never piercing, except when the south wind blows which comes from the mountains, and the snow rarely lies on the ground for more than twenty-four hours. It seldom rains during the autumn and winter months, but frequent showers fall in the early days of spring. Vegetation then awakes again, and the soil lends itself to cultivation in the hollows of the valleys and on the table-lands wherever irrigation is possible. The ancients dotted these now all but desert spaces with wells and cisterns ; they intersected them with canals, and covered them with farms and villages, with fortresses and populous cities. Primaeval forests clothed the slopes of the Amanos, and pinewood from this region was famous both at Babylon and in the towns of Lower Chaldsea.^ The plains produced barley and wheat in enormous quantities, the vine throve there, the gardens teemed with flowers and fruit, and pistachio and olive trees grew on every slope. The desert was always threatening to invade the plain, and gained rapidly upon it whenever a prolonged war disturbed cultivation, or when the negligence of the inhabitants slackened the work of defence : beyond the lakes and salt marshes it had obtained a secure hold. At the present time the greater part of the country between the Orontes and the Euphrates is nothing but a rocky table-land, ridged with low hills and dotted over with some impoverished oases, excepting at the foot of Anti-Lebanon, where two rivers, fed by innumerable streams, have served to create a garden of marvellous beauty. The Barada, dashing from cascade to cascade, flows for some distance through gorges before emerging on the plain : ^ scarcely has it reached level ground than it widens out, divides, and forms around Damascus a miniature delta, into which a thousand interlacing channels carry refreshment and fertility. Below the town these streams rejoin the river, which, after having flowed merrily along for a day's journey, is swallowed up in a kind of elongated chasm from whence it never again emerges. At the melting of the snows a regular lake is formed here, whose blue waters are surrounded by wide grassy niargins " like a sapphire set in emeralds." This lake dries up almost completely in summer, and is converted into swampy meadows, filled with gigantic rushes, among which the birds build their nests, and multiply as unmolested as in the marshes of Chaldsea. The Awaj, unfed by any tributary, ' The ancient native name of the Nahr ed-Dahab, like that of the Khalns, is unknown. ^ On the transport of timber from the Amanos, and on the ancient use of it in the small states of Chaldsea, cf. Maspeeo, Dawn of Civilization, p. 614. * The Barada is the Abana or Amana, mentioned in the Hebrew books as one of the rivers which watered the country round Damascus (2 Kings v. 12), the Bardines or Ohrysorrhoas of the Greeks. TEE COUNTRY OF DAMASCUS AND THE MEDITERRANEAN LITTORAL. 9' fills a second deeper though smaller basin,^ while to the south two other lesser depressions receive the waters of the Anti-Lebanon and the Hauran. Syria is protected from the encroachments of the desert by a continuous barrier of pools and beds of reeds : towards the east the space reclaimed resembles a verdant promontory thrust boldly out into an ocean of sand. The extent of the cultivated area is limited on the west by the narrow strip of rock and clay which forms the littoral. From the mouth of the Litany to that of the Orontes, the coast presents a rugged, precipitous, and inhospitable appearance. There are no ports, and merely a few ill- protected harbours, or narrow beaches lying under formidable headlands. One river, the Nahr el-Kebir,^ which elsewhere would not attract the traveller's attention, is here noticeable as being the only stream whose waters flow constantly and with tolerable regularity ; the others, the Leon,'^ the Adonis,'* and the Nahr el-Kelb,'^ can scarcely even be called torrents, being precipitated as it were in one leap from the Lebanon to the Mediterranean. Olives, vines, and corn cover the maritime plain, while in ancient times the heights were clothed with impenetrable forests of oak, pine, larch, cypress, spruce, and cedar. The mountain range drops in altitude towards the centre of the country and becomes merely a line of low hills, connecting Gebel Ansarieh with the Lebanon proper ; beyond the latter it continues without interruption, till at length, above the narrow Phoenician coast road, it rises in the form of an almost insurmountable wall. Near to the termination of Coele-Syria, but separated from it by a range of hills, there opens out on the western slopes of Hermon a valley unlike any other in the world. At this point the surface of the earth has been rent in pre- historic times by volcanic action, leaving a chasm which has never since closed up. A river, unique in character — the Jordan — flows down this gigantic ' The modern Awaj ia identified with the Pharpar of the Hebn!w text (2 Kings v. 12). ' The Nahr el-Kebir is the Eleutheros of classical geographers (Strabo, xvi. ii., § 12, 15, pp. 754, 755; Pliny, Natural History, iv. 17), its Phoenician name Las not yet been discovered; it was perhaps called Shabtuna or Sbabtun, from wlience the river-name Sabbaticus might be derived. ' The Leon of Ptolemy (v. 15) is perhaps the river which the majority of Roman geographers call Tamyras (Strabo, xvi. ii., § 22, p. 756), or Damuras (Polybids, v. 68, 69), the present Nahr- Damur (Poulaim de Bossay, Essais de restitution et d' interpritation d'un passage de Scylax, pp. 39, 40). * The Adonis of classical authors is now Nahr-Ibrahim. Wo have as yet no direct evidence as to the Phoenician name of this river ; it was probably identical with that of the divinity worshipped on its banks. The fact of a river bearing the name of a god is not surprising : the Belos, in the neighbourhood of Acre, affords us a parallel case to the Adonis (Renan, MUsion de Phenicie, p. 28S). • The present Nahr el-Kelb is the Lykos of classical authors. The Due de Luynes (Foya^e d'erploralion a la mer Morte, vol. i. p. 9, n. 1) thought he recognized a corruption of the Phoenician name in that of Alcobilo, which is mentioned hereabouts in the Itinerary of the pilgrim of Bordeaux. The order of the Itinerary does not favour this identification, and Alcobile is probably Jebuil (M. de VoGt)£, Melanges d'Arck. Orientale, pp. 16, 17) : it is none the less probable that the original name of the Nahr el Kelb contained from earliest times the Phoenician equivalent of the Arab word kelb, " dog."' 10 THE FIRST CHALDJ^JAN EMPIRE. THE MOST NORTHERN SOURCE OF THE JORDAN', THE NAHR EL-HASBANY.' crevasse, fertilizing the valley formed by it from end to end.^ Its principal source is at Tell el-Qadi, where it rises out of a basaltic mound whose summit is crowned by the ruins of Laish.^ The water collects in an oval rocky basin hidden by bushes, and flows down among the brushwood to join the Nahr el-Hasbany, which brings the waters of the upper torrents to swell its stream ; * a little lower down it mingles with the Banias branch,^ and winds for some time amidst desolate marshy meadows before disappearing in the thick beds of rushes bordering Lake Huleh." At this point the Jordan reaches the level of * Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by the Due de Luynes, Voyage d' exploration a la mer Morte, vol. iv. pi. 59. 2 The Jordan is mentioned in the Egyptian texts under the name of Yorduna (Anastasi Papyrus, 'No. 1, pi. xxiii. 1. ]) : the name appears to mean the descender, the down-flowing. ' This source is mentioned by Josephus (Ant. Jad., V. iii. 1 ; VIII. viii. 4) as being that of the Little Jordan, iKa.an ; qui simul mixti Jordanis nomen efHciunt." The two sources which he indicates being those of Banias and Tell el-Qadi, the Nahr el-Hasbany is tlius excluded. ' For the source of the Jordan at Banias, cf. Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, XV. x. 3 ; and Jewish War, I. xxi. 3 ; HI. xv. 7 ; for the difference between the ancient and present condition of the place, see Guerin, Galilee, vol. ii. pp. 312-314. * Lake Huleh is called the Waters of Merom, Me-Merom, in the Book of Joshua, xi. 5, 7 ; and Lake Sammoehonitis in Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, V. v. 1 ; cf. Jewish War, III. x. 7 ; IV. i. 1. The name of Ulatha, which was given to the surrounding country (Josephus, Jewish War, XV. x. 8), shows that the modern word Huleh is derived from an ancient form, of which unfortunately the original has not come down to us (Necbauer, La G^ographie du Talmud, p. 17). 12 THE FIRST CEALDJEAN EMPIRE. the Mediterranean, but instead of maintaining it, the river makes a sudden drop on leaving the lake, cutting for itself a deeply grooved channel. It has a fall of some 300 feet before reaching the Lake of Genesareth,^ where it is only momentarily arrested, as if to gather fresh strength for its headlong career southwards. Here and there it makes furious assaults on its right and left banks, as if to escape from its bed, but the rocky escarpments which hem it in present an insurmountable barrier to it ; from rapid to rapid it descends with such capricious windings that it covers a course of more than 62 miles before reaching the Dead Sea, nearly 1300 feet below the level of the Mediterranean.^ Nothing could offer more striking contrasts than the country on either bank. On the east, the ground rises abruptly to a height of about 3000 feet, resembling a natural rampart flanked with towers and bastions : behind this extends an immense table-land, slightly undulating and intersected in all directions by the affluents of the Jordan and the Dead ' Drawn by Boudier, from several photographs brought back by Lortet. 2 Its most ancient name is the Sea of Kinnereth, Yam-Kinnereth {Numb, xxxiv. 11 ; Josh. xiii. 27), or Yam-Kineroth {Josh. xii. 3) ; from the time of the Greek period it was called the Lake of Gennesar or Guinussar (1 Mace. xi. 67 ; Josephus, Jewish War, III. x. 7, 8 ; cf. Necbauee, G&)graphie du Talmud, p. 255). ' The exact figures are : the Lake of Huleh 7 feet above the Mediterranean ; the Lake of Genesareth 682-5 feet, and the Dead Sea 1292-1 feet below the sea-level; to the south of the Dead Sea, towards the water-parting of the Akabah, the ground is over 720 feet higher than the level of the Bed Sea (Eliseb Reclus, Geographic universelle, vol. ix. pp. 730-735). TEE JOltDAN AND TEE DEAD SEA. 13 THE DEAD SEA AND TUE MOIXTAINS OF MOAB, SEEN FBOM THE HEIGHTS OF ENGEDl.' Sea — the Yarmuk/ the Jabbok/^ and the Arnon.* The whole of this district forms a little world in itself, whose inhabitants, half shepherds, half bandits, live a life of isolation, with no ambition to take part in general history. West of the Jordan, a confused mass of hills rises into sight, their sparsely covered slopes affording an impoverished soil for the cultivation of corn, vines, and olives. One ridge — Mount Carmel — detached from the principal chain near the southern end of the Lake of Genesareth, runs obliquely to the north-west, and finally projects into the sea. North of this range extends Galilee, abounding in refreshing streams and fertile fields ; while to the south, the country falls naturally into three parallel zones — the littoral, composed alternately of dunes and marshes — an expanse of plain, a " Shephelah," * dotted about with woods and watered by intermittent rivers, — and finally the mountains. The region of dunes is not necessarily barren, and the towns situated in it — Gaza, Jaffa, ' Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by the Due de Luvnes, Voyage d'exploiation ii la mer Morte, vol. iii. pi. 26. ' The Yarmuk does not occur in the Bible, but we meet with its name in the Talmud (Xeubavek, La G^bgraphie du Talmud, p. 31), and the Greeks adopted it under the form Hieromax. ' Gen. xxxii. 22; Numb. xxi. 24. The name has been Grucized under the forms lobacchos, labacchos (Josephus, Ant. Jud., I. xx. 2 ; IV. v. 2), lambykes. It is the present Nahr Zerqa. ♦ Numb. xxi. 13-26 ; Deut. ii. 24 ; the present Wady Mojib. * [Shephelah = " low country," plain (Josh. xi. 16). With the article it means the plain along the Mediterranean from Joppa to Gaza. Gk. f) 2ee inscriptione Sargonis regis Assyrise quas vacatur Annalium, thesis iv., and Studien und Beitrdge zur Babylonisch-Assyrischen GescMcMe, in the Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie, vol. ii. p. 302, et seq., and Die Keilschrifltexte Sargons, p. xxxvi. ; cf. Lehmann, Schamaschsohumukin, Konig von iJa%?ow(en, pp. 44-53); Tiele (Bahylonisch-Assyrisdlie GescMchte, -p^. 276, 516) compares it very aptly with the rite performed by the Egyptian kings — at Heliopolis, for example, when they entered alone the sanctuary of Ra, and there contemplated the god face to face. The rite was probably repeated annually (Lehmann, Schamaschschumukin, pj). 51, 53; Winckler, Studien und Beitrdge, in the Zeitschrift fur Assyriologie, vol. ii. pp. 303, 304, and Untersuchungen zur Altorienta- lischer GescMchte, p. 85), at the time of the Zakmuku, that is, the New Year festival. ' Cf. Maspero, Dawn of Civilization, p. 597. According to Nabonidos and his contemporaries, Sargon and Narainsin were kings of Babylon (Eawlinson, Gun. Ins. W. As., vol. i. pi. 69, col. ii. pp. 29, 30). * This region, which comprises the second and third zones into which the country lying between the Tigris and Euphrates may be divided, has been admirably depicted by Olivier, Voyage dans I'Empire Othoman, VEgypte, la Perse, vol. ii. pp. 419-422 ; we are indebted to modern travellers for precise details, but not any of them has studied the country with the method and power of generalisation displayed by Olivier. THE EUPHRATES AND MESOPOTAMIA. 25 I K ATES AT ZULEIHEH.' in the two cliffs, or where they recede from the river, a series of shadufs takes possession of the bank, and every inch of the soil is brought under cultivation.^ The aspect of the country remains unchanged as far as the embouchure of the Khabur; but there a black alluvial soil replaces the saliferous clay, and if only the water were to remain on the land in suffi- cient quantity, the country would be unrivalled in the world for the abundance and variety of its crops. The fields, which are regularly sown in the neigh- bourhood of the small towns, yield magnificent harvests of wheat and barley : while in the prairie-laud beyond the cultivated ground the grass grows so high that it comes up to the horses' girths. In some places the meadows are so covered with varieties of flowers, growing in dense masses, that the effect produced is that of a variegated carpet ; dogs sent in among them in search of game, emerge covered with red, blue, and yellow pollen.^ This fragrant prairie-land is the delight of bees, which produce excellent and abundant honey, while the vine and olive find there a congenial soil. The population was unequally distributed in this region. Some half-savage tribes were • Drawn by Boudier, from tlio plate in Chesney, The Expedition for tlie Survey of the Ilicers Euphrates and Tigris, vol. i. p. i'J. ' The description of the country bordering the Euphrates is given in detail by Oliviei:, Vot/uge dans VEmpire Olhoman, vol. iii. p. 477, ct soq. Palm trees are numerous as far as Anuh (Chksnet, Tlie Expedition for the Survey of the Rivers Euphrates and Tigris, vol. i. p. 53); beyond that spot they are only found in isolated groups as far as Deir, where they cease altogether (Ainsworth, Researches in Aesyria, p. 72). ' This fact was noticed in Assyria by Layard, Niruveh and its Remains, vol. i. p. 78 : more recent travellers have assured me that it was equally true of the country bordering the Khabur. 26 THE FIRST CEALD^AN EMPIRE. accustomed to wander over the plain, dwelling in tents, and supporting life by the chase and by the rearing of cattle ; but the bulk of the inhabitants were concentrated around the affluents of the Euphrates and Tigris, or at the foot of the northern mountains wherever springs could be found, as in Assur, Singar, Nisibis, Tilli,^ Kharranu, and in all the small fortified towns and nameless townlets whose ruins are scattered over the tract of country between the Khabur and the Balikh. Kharranu, or Harran, stood, like an advance guard of Chaldsean civilization, near the frontiers of Syria and Asia Minor.2 To the north it commanded the passes which opened on to the basins of the Upper Euphrates and Tigris; it protected the roads leading to the east and south-east in the direction of the table-land of Iran and the Persian Gulf, and it was the key to the route by which the commerce of Babylon reached the countries lying around the Mediterranean. We have no means of knowing what affinities as regards origin or race connected it with Uru, but the same moon-god presided over the destinies of both towns, and the Sin of Harran enjoyed in very early times a renown nearly equal to that of his namesake. He was worshipped under the symbol of a conical stone, probably an aerolite, surmounted by a gilded crescent,^ and the ground- plan of the town roughly described a crescent-shaped curve in honour of its patron.* His cult, even down to late times, was connected with cruel practices; generations after the advent to power of the Abbasside caliphs, his faithful worshippers continued to sacrifice to him human victims, whose heads, prepared according to the ancient rite, were accustomed to give oracular responses.^ The government of the surrounding country was in the hands of princes who were merely vicegerents : ^ Chaldaean civilization before the ' Tilli, the only one of these towns mentioned with any certainty in the inscriptions of the first Chaldsean empire (cf. Maspero, Dawn of Civih'zaiion, p. 614, note 3), is tlie Tela of classical authors, and probably the present Weraushaher, near the sources of the Balikh. * Kharranu was identified by the earlier Assyriologists with the Harran of the Hebrews {Gen. V. 12), the Carrhse of classical authors (Strabo, xvi. 1, § 23, p. 747 ; Pliny, Nat. Hist, v. 24), and this identification is still generally accepted (Finzi, Ricerche per Jo studio dell' Antichita Assira, pp. 268-270 ; Fb. Scheader, Die Keilinschriften und das Alte Testament, 2nd edit., pp. 134, 149) ; cf., however, what is said on p. 65 of this work. ^ Winokler (Altorientalische Forschungen, pp. 83, 84) believes that the Sin of Harran is probably a moon-god of the Semites, in contradistinction to Nannar of Uru, who would be more specially the moon-god of the Sumerians. For the two Sins, cf. Sayce, The Religion of the Ancient Babylonians, pp. 160-165, who gives his opinion with greater reserve. * Sachau, Reise in Syrien und Mesopotamien, p. 223 ; and Baal-Harrdii in einer Aliaramdischen Inschrift auf einem Relief des Koniglichen Museums zu Berlin, p. 3. * For the cultus of Sin at Harran, cf. Maspero, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 658, 659. Without seeking to specify exactly wliich were the doctrines introduced into Harranian religion subsequently to the Christian era, we may yet affirm that the base of this system of faith was merely a very distorted form of the ancient Chaldsean worship practised in the town. The information collected with regard to their history by Chwolson, Die Ssabier, vol. i., has been completed by the text pub- lished by DozY-GOEJE, Nouveaux Documents pour I'Aude de la religion des Harraniens, in the Actes du 6" Congres des Orientalistes, tenu en 1883, a Leyde, 2nd part, sect. 1, pp. 281-366. ^ Only one vicegerent of Blesopotamia is known at present, and he belongs to the Assyrian epocli. His seal is preserved in the British Museum (Pinches, Guide to the Koyundjih Gallery, p. 128). THE FIRST BABYLONIAN DYNASTY. 27 beginnings of history had more or less laid hold of them, and made theia willing subjects to the kings of Babylon.^ These sovereigns were probably at the outset somewhat obscure personages, without much prestige, being sometimes independent and sometimes subject to the rulers of neighbouring states, among others to those of Agade. In later times, when Babylon had attained to universal power, and it was desired ta furnish her kings with a continuous history, the names of these earlier rulers were sought out, and added to those of such foreign princes as had from time to time enjoyed the sovereignty over them — thus forming an interminable list which for materials and authenticity would well compare with that of the Thinite Pharaohs.^ This list has come down to us incomplete, and its remains do not permit of our determining the exact order of reigns, or the status of the individuals who composed it. We find in it, in the period immediately subse- quent to the Deluge, mention of mythical heroes, followed by names which are still semi-legendary, such as Sargon the Elder ; the princes of the series were, however, for the most part real beings, whose memories had been preserved by tradition, or whose monuments were still existing in certain localities.^ Towards the end of the XXV"' century before our era, however, a dynasty rose into power of which all the members come within the range of history.* Th& first of them, Sumuabim, has left us some contracts bearing the dates of one " The importance of-Harran in the development of the history of the first Chaldwan empire was pointed out by Winckleu, Geschichte Babyloniens und Astijrieiig, pp. 31, n. 2, H8-150, and AllorUn- taliteher Forechungen, pp. 7i-'J7, 140, 230, 231 ; but tbo theory according to which this town was tl»e capital of the kingdom, called by the Clialdwan and Assyrian scribes " the kingdom of the world " (cf. Dawn of Civilization, p. 596, nolo 2), is justly combated by Tielo in the Zettichri/l fur Aesyriologie, vol. vii. pp. 368-370. ' For the composition of these dynasties, cf. Masi'ebo, Daicn of Civilization, pp. 236-242. ' The kings subsequent to the Deluge are mentioned in the Dawnof Civiliziilion, p. 5'J2. * This dynasty, wbicii is known to us in its entirety by the two lists of G. Smith {On Fragmentt of an Inscription giving part of the Chronology from which the Canon of Berosus was copied, in the Transactions of the Biblical Archajological Society, voL iii. pp. 365, 366, 372, 373) and by Pinches. {The Babylonian Kings of the Second Period, in the Proceedings, 1883-84, p. 195), was legitimately composed of only eleven kings, and was known as the Babylonian dynasty, although Sayce suspects it to be of Arabian origin {Patriarchal Palestine, pp. vii., viii., 62-64). It is com|x>sed as follows :- I. SumuabIm ... 15 2416-2401 VI. KuAMMi'iiABt . . 5.*) 2304-224:* II. SuMULAiLU ... 35 2401-2366 VII. SamsuIluna. . . ;!5 2249-2214 III. Zabum 14 2366-2352 VIII. Abeshiku . 25 2214-2189 llmmeru'] < IX. Ammisataxa . . 25 2189-2164 IV. Abilsin 18 2352-2334 X. Ammizaduoga . 21 2164-2143 V. SiNMUBALLiT ... 30 2334-2304 XI. Samsusatana . . 31 2143-2112 The dates of this dynasty are not fixed with entire certainty. Uommel {Geschichte Babyloniens und Assyriens, pp. 169, 173, 174, 351-353 ; cf. A Supplementary Note to Gibil-Gamish, in the Proceedings of the Biblical Archteol. Soc, vol. xvi., 1893-94, p. 14) believes that the order of the dynasties has been reversed, and that the first upon the lists we possess was historically the secoud; he thus places the Babylonian dynasty between 2035 and 1731 B.C. His opinion has not been generally adopted, but every Assyriologist dealing with this period proposes a different date for the reigns in this dynasty ; to take only ono characteristic example, Khammurabi is placed by Oppert {The Heal CliTonology and the True History of the Babylonian Dynasties, in the Babylonian and Oriental Becord, vol. ii. 1). 108) in the year 2394-2339, by Delitzsch-Murdter {Geschichte Babyloniens und Assyriens, 2nd edit., p. 85 and vol. i.) in 2287-2232, by Winckler {Untersuchungen zur Altorientalischen 28 TEE FIRST CEALDJEAN EMPIRE. or other of the fifteen years of his reign,^ and documents of public or private interest abound in proportion as we follow down the line of his successors. Sumulailu, who reigned after him, was only distantly related to his predecessor ; but from Sumulailu to Samshusatana the kingly power was transmitted from father to son without a break for nine generations, if we may credit the testi- mony of the official lists.^ Contemporary records, however, prove that the course of affairs did not always run so smoothly. They betray the existence of at least one usurper — Immeru — who, even if he did not assume the royal titles, enjoyed the supreme power for several years between the reigns of Zabu and Abilsin.^ The lives of these rulers closely resembled those of their contemporaries of Southern Chaldsea.* They dredged the ancient canals, or constructed new ones ; ^ they restored the walls of their fortresses, or built fresh strongholds on the frontier they religiously kept the festivals of the divinities belonging to their terrestrial domain, to whom they annually rendered solemn homage.'' They repaired the temples as a matter of course, and enriched them according to their means ; we even know that Zabu, the third in order of the line of sovereigns, occupied himself in building the sanctuary Bulbar of Anunit, in Sippara.^ There is evidence that they possessed the small neighbouring kingdoms of Kishu, Sippara, and Kuta, and that they had consolidated them into a single state, of which Babylon was the capital. To the south their GeschicMe, p. 35, and Geschiehte Bahyloniens und Assyriens, p. 60) in 2264-2210, and by Peiser (Zur Babylonischen Clironologie, in the Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie, vol. vi. p. 267) in 2139-2084, and by Carl Niebuhr (Die Chronolocjie der Geichichte Israels, p. 74) in 2081-2026. ' See the notice of some contracts of Sumuabim in Bruno Meissnek, Beifrdge zum altbahylonischen Privatrecht, p. 4. ^ Sumulailu, also written Samu-la-ilu, whom Mr. Pinches has found in a contract tablet associated with Pungunila as king, was not the sou of Sumuabim, since the lists do not mention him as such ; he must, however, have been connected by some sort of relationship, or by marriage, with his pre- decessor, since both are placed in the same dynasty. A few contracts of Sumulailu are given by Meissnek, Beitrdge zum altbahylonischen Privatrecht, p. 4. Samsuiluna calls him "my forefather (d-gula-mu), the fifth king before me ' {Cyl. Sams. ii. 62-64). ^ Bruno Meissnee, op. cit, p. 4. ^ See the description given of these in Maspero, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 617-619. * Contract dated in " the year in which Immeru dug the canal Ashukhun " (Meissner, op, cit., p. 22, n. 10) ; contract dated " the year of the canal Tutu-khegal " (Id., Hid., pp. 24, 25, 83, 84). The exact site of Tutu-khegal is still unknown. « Sumulailu had built six such large strongholds of brick, which were repaired by Samsuiluna five generations later (Wincklek, Untersuchungen zur altorientalischen Geschiehte, pp. 7, 142, and Keilinschriftliche Bibliothelc, vol. iii. pp. 132, 133 ; Hommel, Geschiehte Bahyloniens und Assyriens, p. 353). A fortress on the Elamite frontier, Kar-Dur-Abilsin, mentioned in a mutilated inscription p. 362, 363; Die Semitischen Viilker und Sprache, p. 345; Halevy, Notes Sum€riennes, § 5, in the Revue S^mitique, vol. ii. pp. 270-276 ; Sayce, Patriarchal Palestine, p. 65, et seq.). Others have made a distinction between tho two forms, and have made out of them the names of two difien nt kings (G. Smith, Early History of Babylonia, in the Transactions of the Biblical Arch. S(X'., vol. i. pp. 42, 43, and 53-55, where tlie author preserves, side by side with Rimsin, Oppert's reading of Ardusin, Aradsin; Fu. Delitzscu, Die Sprache der Kossxir, pp. 68, 69; Tiele, Bab. Astyrische Ge- schichte, pp. 122-124). They are all variants of tho same name. I have adopted the form Rimsin, which is preferred by a few Assyriologists. [The tablets recently discovered by Mr. Pinelie.-J, refer- ring to Kudur-lagamar and Tudkhula, which he has published in a Paper read before the Victoria Institute, Jan. 20, 1896, have shown that the true reading is Eri-Aku. The Elamite name Eri-Aku, " servant of the moon-god," was clianged by some of his subjects into the Babylonian Rim-Sin, " Have mercy, O Moon-god ! " just as Abcsukb, the Hebrew Abishu'a (" the father of welfare ") was transformed into the Babylonian Ebisum (" the actor ").— Ed.] 30 TEE FIRST CffALDJEAN EMPIRE. affairs of her neighbours. In fabulous times, one of her mythical kings — Khumbaba the Ferocious — had oppressed Uruk, and Gilgames with all his valour was barely able to deliver the town.'^ Sargon the Elder is credited with having subdued Elam ; the kings and vicegerents'of Lagash had measured forces with Anshan as well as with Uru and Larsam, but with uncertain issue. From time to time they obtained an advantage, and we find recorded in the annals victories gained by Gudea, Ine-sin, or Bursin,^ but to be followed only by fresh reverses ; at the close of such campaigns, and in order to seal the ensuing peace, a princess of Susa would be sent as a bride to one of the Chaldsean cities, or a Chaldaean lady of royal birth would enter the harem of a king of Anshan.3 Elam was protected along the course of the Tigris and on the shores of the Nar-Marratum by a wide marshy region, impassable except at a few fixed and easily defended places.* The alluvial plain extending behind the marshes was as rich and fertile as that of Chaldaea. Wheat and barley ordinarily yielded an hundred and at times two hundredfold ; ^ the towns were surrounded by a shadeless belt of palms ; ® the almond, fig, acacia, poplar, and willow extended in narrow belts along the rivers' edge.' The climate closely resembles that of Chaldaja : if the midday heat in summer is more pitiless, it is at least tempered by more frequent east winds.® The ground, however, soon begins to rise, ascending gradually towards the north-east. The distant and uniform line of mountain-peaks grows loftier on the approach of the traveller, and the hills begin to appear one behind another, clothed halfway up with thick forests, but bare on their summits, or scantily covered with meagre vegetation. They comprise, in fact, six or seven parallel ranges, ^ Cf. what is said on this subject ia Maspeeo, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 579, 580. A much mutilated text, published by A. Strong (Three Cuneiform Teats, in the Babylonian and Oriental Record, vol. vi. pp. 4-9), appears to refer in the same way to some fabulous struggle between a very ancient king of Chaldsea and a certain Khumbasitir, King of Elam. Contract dated "the year in which the King Ine-Sin ravaged Anshan" (Scheil, Notes d'Jipig. et d'ArcMologie Assyriennes, in the Recueil de Travaux, vol. xvii. p. 37; cf. Constantinople, N. 394). ' Contract dated "the year in which the king's daughter went to Anshan" (Soheil, Notes d'Epi- -grapMe et d' Arckgologie Assyriennes, in the Recueil de Travaux, vol. xvii. p. 38) ; an unpublished contract of Constantinople is dated " the year in which the daughter of the King Ine-Sin became vice- gerent in Anshan and in Markliasi," probably by marriage with the vicegerent of these countries. The title of "vicegerent" used in this passage appears to denote that Anshan was subject to the King Ine-Sin. * The geography of Elam has been made the subject of minute study in the monograph by BiLLEKBECK, Susa, eine Studie zur Alien GeschicMe Westasiens, pp. 1-23. ' Stkabo, XV. 3, § 11, p. 731, who appears, however, to have taken his information in this case from the stories of Aristobulus, which should always be received with caution. " Strabo, XV. 3, § 10, p. 731 ; xvi. 1, § 5, p. 739. Assyrian sculptures show us that these grew around the towns in the time of Assurbauipal as commonly as at the present day (Layard, Monu- ments of Nineveh, vol. ii. pi. 49). ' LoPTCS, Travels and Researches in Chaldasa and Susiana, pp. 270, 316. * Stkabo, xv. 3, § 10, p. 731, again following Aristobulus, relates that in summer the heat at midday is so excessive that snakes cannot cross the streets without running the risk of being literally baked by the sun. Modern travellers have shown themselves less susceptible to a high temperature, and have rarely left record of a day when the heat was unbearable (Loftus, Travels and Researches in Chaldxa and Susiana, pp. 290, 307). THE CLIMATE AND RIVERS OF EL AM. 31 resembling natural ramparts piled up between the country of the Tigris and the table-land of Iran. The intervening valleys were formerly lakes, having had for the most part no communication v?ith each other and no outlet into the sea. In the course of centuries they had dried up, leaving a thick deposit of JIAl' or CHALD.EA AND ELAM. mud in the hollows of their ancient beds, from which sprang luxurious and abundant harvests.^ The rivers— the Uknu,'' the Ididi,^ and the Ulai* — which water this region are, on reaching more level ground, connected by ' Elisee Reclus, 0€ograpliie universelle, vol. ix. p. 1G8. ' Tlie Uknu is the Kcrkhah of the present day, tlie Clioaspos of the Greeks (Fa. Delitzsch, Wo lag dat Paradiesi pp. 193-196). ' The IJidi was at first identified with the ancient Pasitigris (Finzi, Ricerche iiitonto all' Anti- chita Assira, p. 281), which scholars then desired to distinguish from the Eulasos : it is now known to be the arm of the Karun which runs to Dizful (Fit. Delitzsch, Wo lag das Paraditsl p. 329), the Koprates of classical times (Strabo, xv. 3, § 6, p. 729), which has sometimes been confounded with ttie Eulffios. * The Ulai, mentioned in the Hebrew texts {Dan. viiL 2, IG), the EuI»os of classical writers 32 THE FIRST CHALDEAN EMPIBE. canals, and are constantly shifting their beds in the light soil of the Susian plain : they soon attain a width equal to that of the Euphrates, but after a short time lose half their volume in swamps, and empty themselves at the present day into the Shatt-el-Arab. They flowed formerly into that part of the Persian Gulf which extended as far as p . " I Kornah, and the sea thus formed i the southern frontier of the \ I . i kingdom.^ j From earliest times this ' 1 country was inhabited by three ' distinct peoples, whose descen- , / dants may still be distinguished at the present day, and although they have dwindled in numbers and become mixed with elements of more recent origin, the resem- blance to their forefathers is still very remarkable. There were, in J ^ the first place, the short and robust I people of well-knit figure, with I i brown skins, black hair and eyes, who belonged to that negritic race which inhabited a consider- able part of Asia in prehistoric , , , . ^ times.^ These prevailed in the lowlands and the valleys, where the AN ANCIENT SUSIAN OF NEGRITIC EACE.^ xwvrxo, oiv ^ j , warm, damp climate favoured their development ; but they also spread into the mountain region, and had pushed their outposts as far as the first slopes of the Iranian table-land. They there came into contact with a white-skinned people of medium height, who were probably allied to the nations of Northern and Central Asia— to the Scythians, (Akrian, Anahasif, vii. 7 ; Diodorus Sicdlus, xix. 19), also called Pasitlgris (Arkian, Hist. Ind., xiii. ; Stbabo, XV. 3, § 46, pp. 718-729 ; Pliny, Hist. Nat, vi. 31). It is the Karun of the present day (Fe. Delitzsch, Wo lag das Paradies ? p. 329), until its confluence with the Shaur, and subsequently the Shaur itself, which waters the foot of the Susian hills. ' For the ancient limits of the Persian Gulf and the alluvial deposits which have gradually filled it from early times, cf. Maspero, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 548, 549. 2 The connection of the negroid type of Susians with the negritic races of India and Oceania, suspected by Quatrefages-Hamy, Crania Ethnica, pp. 152, 166, has been proved, in the course of M. Dieulafoy's expedition to the Susian plains and the ancient provinces of Elam, by the researches of Fe. Hotjssay, Les Eaees humaines de la Perse, pp. 28-45, 48 ; cf. Dieclafot, L'Acropole de Suse, pp. 7, 8, 10, 11, 27-33, 30, 37. * Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a bas-relief of Sargon II. in the Louvre. THE PEOPLES AND THE CITIES OF ELAM. 33 NATIVE OF MIXED NEGBITIC RACE FKOSI SUSFANA.* for instance, if it is permissible to use a vague term employed by the Ancients.^ Semites of the same stock as those of ChaldDea pushed forward as far as the east bank of the Tigiis, and settling mainly among the marshes led a precarious life by fishing and pillaging.^ The country of the plain was called Anzan, or Anshan,^ and the mountain region Numma, or Ilamma, " the high lands : " these two names were subsequently used to denote the whole country, and Ilamma has sur- vived in the Hebrew word Elam.* Susa, the most important and flourishing town in the kingdom, was situated between the Ulai and the Ididi, some twenty-five or thirty miles from the nearest of the mountain ' This last-mentioned people is, by some autliora, for reasons which, so far, can liardly be con- sidered conclusive, connected with the so-called Sumerian race, which we lind settled in Chaldtea (cf. Masfero, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 550, 551). Tliey are said to have been the first to employ horses and chariots in warfare (Billeiibeck, Susa, p. 24). ' From the earliest times we meet beyond the Tigris with names like that of Durilu (cf. Maspebo, Dawn of Civilization, p. 598), a fact which proves the existence of races speaking a Semitic dialect in the countries under the suzerainty of the King of Elam : in the last days of the ChaldaBnn empire they had assumed such importauce that the Hebrews made out Elam to be one of the sons of Shorn (Gfii. x. 22). ' Anzau, Anslian, and, by assimilation of the nasal with the sibilant, Ashshan. This name has already been mentioned in the inscriptions of the kings and vicegerents of Lagash (cf. Maspebo, Dawn of Civilization, pp. G03, GIO) and in the Booh of Prophecies of the ancient Chaldajaii astronomers ; it also occurs in the royal preamble of Cyrus and his ancestors (Rawlinson, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. y. pi. 35,11. 12, 21), who like him were styled "kings of Ansh&n." It had been applied to the whole country of Elam (Halevy, Melanges de Critique et d'Uisloire, pp. G, 7, 117-119, 129, 130), and after- wards to Persia (Amiacd, Cyrus, roi de Perse, in the Mdanges Renter, pp. 243-260; Ofpebt, in the Gettingische gelehrte Ameigen, 1881, No. 40, 1254-5G, where the author questions the identify of /Vnshan with Anzan, regarding the latter word as the name of Elam, and the former as that of a Persian town, Pasargadie or Marrhasion); others are of opinion that it was tlio name of a part of Elam, viz. that inhabited by the Turanian Medes who spoke the second language of the Acliaame- nian inscriptions (Delattbe, Le Peuple et la Langue des Perses, pp. 44, et seq.), tlie eastern half (H. Rawlinson, Notes on a Clay Cylinder of Cyrus the Great, in the J. It. As. S., new series, vol. xii. pp. 70-97, where the author connects the name with a town called Assan, mentioned as being in the neighbourhood of Shuster ; Tiele, Babylonisch-Assyrische Geschichte, p. 4G9), bounded by the Tigris and the Persian Gulf, consisting of a flat and swampy land (Sayce, The Languages of the Cun. Inscr. of Elam, in the Trans. Bibl. Arch. Soc, vol. iii. p. 475, and The Inscriptions of Mai-Amir, i)p. 4, 5). These differences of opinion gave rise to a heated controversy; it is now, however, pretty generally admitted that Anzftn-Anshan was really the plain of Elam, from the mountains to the sea, and one set of authorities affirms that the word Anzftn may have meant " plain " in the language of the country (Oppert, Les Inscriptions en langue susiemie, in the M^m. du Congres internal, des Orientalistes de Paris, vol. ii. p. 194 ; cf. Fb. Deutzsch, Wo lag das Parodies 1 p. 326), while others hesitate as yet to pronounce definitely on this point (Weissbacii, Anzanisehe Inschriften, in the Ahhandlungen of the Sax. Academy of Sciences, vol. xii. p. 137; vol. xiv. p. 736). * The meaning of "Numma," "Ilamma," "Ilamtu," in tlie group of words used to indicate Elam, had been recognised even by the earliest Assyriologists; tlie name originally referred to the hilly country on the north and east of Susa (Fr. Delitzsch, Wo lag das Paradiesi p. 320). To the Hebrews, Elam was one of the sons of Shem (Gen. x. 22). The Greek form of the name is Elymais, and some of the classical geographers were well enough acquainted with the meaning of the word to bo able to distinguish the region to which it referred from Susiana proper : 'EKvuai (var. 'ZKu/jiats), Xupa 'Affavpiwv irpbi t»7 UtptriKyj rfj! iovaiSos iyyvt (STEPHEN OF Byzantii'M, s. v. I.). ' Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph furnished by Marcel Dieulafoy. D 34 TEE FIRST CHALDEAN EMPIRE. ranges. Its fortress and palace were raised upon the slopes of a mound which overlooked the surrounding country : ^ at its base, to the eastward, stretched the town, with its houses of sun-dried bricks.^ Further up the course of THE TUMULU the Uknu, lay the following cities : Madaktu, the Badaca of classical authors,* rivalling Susa in strength and importance; Naditu,^ Til-Khumba,^ Dur- Undash,'^ Khaidalu,** — all large walled towns, most of which assumed the title of royal cities.^ Elam in reality constituted a kind of feudal empire, composed ■ Susa, in the language of the country, was called Shushun (Oppert, Les Inscriptions en langue susienne, Essai d' interpretation, in the M^moires du Congres international des Orientalistes de Paris, vol. ii. p. 179); this name was transliterated into Chaldijeo- Assyrian, by Shushan, Shushi (Fb. Delitzsch, Wo lag das Paradies ? pp. 326, 327). 2 On the site of the citadel, cf. M. Dieulafoy, L'Acropole de Suse, p. 117, et seq. Strabo (xv. 3, § 2, p. 728) tells us, on the authority of Polycletus, that the town had no walls in the time of Alexander, and extended over a space two hundred stadia in length ; in the VII"' century B.C. it was enclosed by walls with bastions, which are shown on a bas-relief of Assurbanipal, but it was surrounded by unfortified suburbs (Layard, Monuments of Nineveh, vol. ii. pi. 49). ' Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, after a plate in Chesney's Expedition for the Survey of the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates, vol. ii. p. 356. It represents the tumulus of Susa as it appeared prior to the excavations of Loftus and the Dieulafoys. * Madaktu, Mataktu, the Badaka of Diodorus (xix. 19), situated on tlie Eulseos, between Susa and Ecbatana, has been placed by Eawlinson {The Five Great Monarchies, vol. ii. p. 173, No. 3) near the bifurcation of the Kerkhah, either at Paipul or near Aiwan-i-Kherkah, where there are some rather important and ancient ruins; Billerbeck (Susa, pp. 71, 72) prefers to put it at the mouth of the valley of Zal-fer, on the site at present occupied by the citadel of Kala-i-Eiza. ' Naditu is identified by Finzi (Ricerche intorno alio Studio dell' Antichita Assira, p. 298) with the village of Natanzah, near Ispahan ; it ought rather to be looked for in the neighbourhood of Sarna. * Til-Khumba, the Mound of Khumba, so named after one of the principal Elamite gods, was, per- haps, situated among the ruins of Budbar, towards the confluence of the Ab-i-Kirind and Kerkhah, or possibly higher up in the mountain, in the vicinity of Asmanabad (Billerbeck, Susa, p. 72). ' Dur-Undash, Dur-Undasi, has been identified, without absolutely conclusive reason, with the fortress of Kala-i-Dis on the Disful-Kud (Billerbeck, Susa, p. 72). ^ Khaidalu, Khidalu, is perhaps the present fortress of Dis-Mulkan (Billerbeck, Susa, p. 72). 0 E.g. Madaktu (Rawlinson, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. v. pi. 5, 11. 13, 72, 81), Naditu (lD.,{bid., 1. 77), Dur-Undasi (Id., ibid., 1. 94), Khidalu (Id., pi. 3, 1. 49). THE LANGUAGE AND THE GODS OF EL AM. 35 of several tribes — the Habardip, the Khushshi,^ the Umliyash, the people of Yamutbal and of Yatbur ^ — all independent of each other, but often united under the authority of one sovereign, who as a rule chose Susa as the seat of govern- ment. The language is not represented by any idioms now spoken, and its affinities with the Sumerian which some writers have attempted to establish, are too uncertain to make it safe to base any theory upon them.^ The little that we know of Eiamite religion reveals to us a mysterious world, full of strange names and vague forms.^ Over their hierarchy there presided a deity who was called Shushinak (the Susian), Dimesh or Saraesh, Dagbag, Assiga, Adaene, and possibly Khumba and Umman, whom the Chaldaeans identified with their god Ninip ; ■' his statue was concealed in a sanctuary inaccessible to the profane, but it was dragged from thence by Assurbanipal of Nineveh in the VII"' century B.c.^ ' Stbabo, xi. 13, § 3, (j, pp. 523, 524, on tlio authority of Nearchus, an admiral under Alexander, divides the peoples of Susiana into four races of brigands— the Mardi, Uxiane, Eljuijeans, and CosssBans. The Mardi or Amardians are the Habardip of the Assyro-Chaldsean inscriptions, the Khapirti-Apirti of the Susian and Achajmenian texts, who inhabited the region to the north-east of ^Susa, where are the monuments of Mai-Amir (Nomas, Scylhic Version of the Dehittun Inscription in the Journ. H. As. Soc, vol. xv. pp. 4, 164; Sayce, The Languages of the Cuneiform Liscriptions of Elam and Media, in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archajology, vol. iii. p. 4G8, and Tfie Inscriptions of Mai- Amir, pp. 0-9) ; the Uxians are the Khushshi (Oppert, Les InscriiAions en langue lusienm, Essai d' interpretation, in the Memoires du Congres international des Orientalittes de Paris, •vol. ii. p. 183), and the Elymojans are the Elaraites (cf. p. 33, note 3, of the present work). The identity of the Cossoeans will be discussed at greater length on pp. 113-120 of this volume. * The countries of Yatbur and Yamutbal extended into the plain between the marshes of the Tigris and the mountain ; the town of Durilu was near the Yamutbal region, if not in that country itself (Fk. Delitzscu, Wo lag das Paradies f p. 230; Hummel, Geschichle liabyloniens und Assyriens, pp. 342, 354, who derives this name from that of Mutabil, governor of Durilu). Umliyash lay between the Uknu and the Tigris (Fii. Delitzsch, Wo lag das Paradies i pp. 230, 231). ' A great part of the Susian inscriptions have been collected by Fu. Lenoumant, Choix de Texiei cungi/ormes in^dits, pp. 115-141. They have been studied successively by Oppert, Les Inscriptions en langue susienne, Essai ^interpretation (in the Memoires du Congres international de* Orientaliste* de Paris, 1873, vol. ii. pp. 79-21G) ; by Sayce, Tlte Languagesof the Cuneiform Inscriptions of Elam (in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archasology, vol. iii. pp. 465-485), and Tlie Inscriptions of Mai-Amir and the Language of the Second Column of the Achmmenian Inscriptions (in the Actes du sixieme Congres des Orientalistes, tenu en 1SS3 a Leyde, vol. ii. pp. C37-75G); subscijuently by Weiss- haoh, Amanische Inschrif ten (ia the Ahhandlungen der Kgl. Sdchsischen Gesellscliafl der Wissenschaften, vol. xii. pp. 119-150), and Neue Beitrage zur Kunde der Susischen Inschriften (voL xiv. pp. 731-777 of the same); by Qlentin, Textes Susiens (in the Journal Asiatique, 1891, vol. xvii. p. 150, et seq.) ; and lastly by Winckler, Zu den altsmischen Inschriften (in the ZeiUchrift fur Assyriologie, vol. vi. pp. 317-326). An attempt has been made to identify the language in which they are written with ihe Sumero-accadian (Lenormant, La Magie chez les Clmldeens, pp. 322-328, and La Langue primitive de la Chaldee, pp. 313-316), and authorities now generally agree in considering the Achtemenian inscriptions of the second type as representative of its modern form, cf. Weissbach, Atuanische In- schriften, pp. 149, 150. Hommel (Geschichle Babyloniens und Atsyriens, pp. 40, 47, 274, ot seq., and Die Sumero-Akkadische Sprache, in the Zeitichrift fur Keilschriftforschung, vol. i. i)p. 330-340) connects it with Georgian, and includes it in a great linguistic family, which comprises, besides these two idioms, the Hittite, the Cappadocian, the ^\j-menian of the Van inscriptions, and the Cosssean. Oppert claims to have discovered on a tablet in the British Museum a list of words belonging to one of the idioms (probably Semitic) of Susiana, which differs alike from the Suso-Medic and the Assyrian (ia Langue des Elamites, in the Eevue d' Assyriologie, vol. i. pp. 45-49). * There arc only about twenty lines or so on the religion of the Elamites iu Fb. Lesormant's La Magie chez les Chaldeens, p. 321, note 1, and a page in Fb. Delitzsch's Die Sprache derKossder, pp. 42,43. ' H. Kawlinson, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. ii. pi. 57, 11. 46-50 ; Fr. Delitzscu, Die Sprache der KostSer, p. 42, after the text published by Rawlinsou. ' Shushinak is an adjective derived from the name of the town of Susa. The real name of the god was probably kept secret and rarely uttered. The names which appear by the side of Shushinak 36 TEE FIRST CHALDEAN EMPIRE. This deity was associated with six others of the first rank, who were divided into two triads — Shumudu, Lagamaru, Partikira ; Ammankasibar, Uduran, and f , — — -, 1 Sapak : of these names, the least repellent, Ammankasibar, may possibly be the Memnon of the Greeks.^ The dwelling of these divinities was near Susa, in the depths of a sacred forest to which the priests and kings alone had access j their images were brought out on certain days to receive solemn homage, and were afterwards carried back to their shrine accompanied by a devout and reverent multitude. These deities received a tenth of the spoil 'j after any successful campaign — the offerings comprising statues of the enemies' gods, valuable vases, ingots of gold and silver, furniture, and stuffs.^ The Elamite armies were well or- and under a skilful general became irresistible. In other respects the Elamites closely resembled the Chal- daeans, pursuing the same indus- A,N i^LAMiJi. ILLS , 'i.N,\\Lii\( lu iiiL II M 1 \ i.MiTAK. ^^^.^^ havlug thc saffic agrl" cultural and commercial instincts. In the absence of any bas-reliefs and inscriptions peculiar to this people, we may glean from the monuments of Lagash and Babylon a fair idea of the extent of their civilization in its earliest stages. The cities of the Euphrates, therefore, could have been sensible of but little change, when the chances of war transferred them from the rule of their native princes to that of an Elamite. The struggle once over, and the resulting evils in the text published by H. Eawlinson, Gun. Ins. W. As., vol. v. pi. 57, 11. 46-50, as equivalents of the Babyloniaa Ninip, perhaps represent different deities ; we may well ask whether the deity may not be the Khumba, Umma, Umman, who recurs so frequently in the names of men and places, and who has hitherto never been met with alone in any formula or dedicatory tablet. As to the sanctuary in which he resided, cf. Eawlinson, Gun. Ins. W. As., vol. v. pi. 6, 11. 30, 31. • Rawlinson, Gun. Ins. W. As., vol. v. pi. 6, 11. 33-36 ; cf. G. Smith, History of Assurbanipal, p. 228, and Jensen, Inschriften Aschurbanipal's, in the Keilinschriflliche Bibliotheh, vol. ii. p. 205. Fr. Lenormant was inclined to think that Ammankasibar represented a solar god and Uduran a lunar god (ia Magie ehez les Chalde'ens, p. 319, n. 1). ^ Rawlinson, Gun. Ins. W. As., vol. v. pi. 6, 11. 65-69, describing the sack of Susa by Assurbanipal. ^ Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a bas-relief in Layard's Monuments of Nineveh, vol. i. pi. 65. KUDUR-NAKEUNTA CONQUERS URUK AND LARSAM. 37 repaired as far as practicable, the people of these towns resumed their usual ways, hardly conscious of the presence of their foreign ruler. The victors, for their part, became assimilated so rapidly with the vanquished, that at the •close of a generation or so the conquering dynasty was regarded as a legitimate and national one, loyally attached to the traditions and religion of its adopted country. In the year 2285 B.C., towards the close of the reign of Nurramman, or in the earlier part of that of Siniddinam,^ a King of Elam, by name Kudur-nakhunta,^ triumphantly marched through Chaldaea from end to end, devastating the country and sparing neither town nor temple : Uruk lost its statue of Nana, which was carried off as a trophy find placed in the sanctuary of Susa. The inhabitants long mourned the detention of their goddess, and a hymn of lamentation, probably composed for the occasion by one of their priests, kept the remembrance of the disaster fresh in their memories. " Until when, oh lady, shall the impious enemy ravage the country ! — In thy queen-city, Uruk, the destruction is accom- plished, — in Bulbar, the temple of thy oracle, blood has flowed like water, — upon the whole of thy lands has he poured out flame, and it is spread abroad like smoke. — Oh, lady, verily it is hard for me to bend under the yoke of misfortune ! — Oh, lady, thou hast wrapped me about, thou hast plunged me, in sorrow ! — The impious mighty one has broken me in pieces like a reed, — and I know not what to resolve, I trust not in myself, — like a bed of reeds I sigh day and night! — I, thy servant, I bow myself before thee!"^ It would appear that the whole of Chaldaea, including Babylon itself, was forced to acknowledge the supremacy of the invader;* a Susian empire thus ' Cf. Maspisuo, Dawn of Civilization, p. 619, for a summary of the littlo we know iu regard to the reigns of Nurramml,n and Siniddinam. ' G. Smith, Ilintory of Jssurbanipal, pp. 249-251, where Assurbanipal tells how he recovered, at Susa, the statue of Nanfi,, which King Kudurnankhundi had carried oil' 163o years (other copies of the same text give 1535 years) before his time. This document, discovered by G. Smith {Egyptian Campaigns of Etarhaddon and Asuur-lani-pal in the Zeittchri/l fiir Jigyplieche Sprache, 1808, pp. 115, 116), has enabled historians to establish approximately the chronology of the first Babylonian empire. As we do not know the date of the capture of Susa by Assurbanipal, the possible error in regard to the date of this Kudurnankhundi is about twenty years, more or less; the invasion of <3haldasa falls, therefore, between 2275 and 2295 B.C. if we accept the figures 1635, or between 2175 and 2195 if wo take 1535 to be correct. Kudurnankhundi is a corruption of the name Kuduruakhuuta, which occurs in the Susiun inscriptions. As Kudur, or rather Kutur, means nrvant (Sayck, The Languages of the Cuneiform Inscriptions of Elam, iu the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, vol. iii. p. 476), Kuduruakhuuta signifies " servant of the goddess Nakhunla." ' Rawlinson, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. iv. pi. 19, No. 3; cf. Fk. Lenohmant, Etudes Accadiennet, vol. iL pp. 101-106, and vol. iii. pp. 36, 37 ; Hommel, Die Semitischen Vdlkcr, p. 225, and Geschichte Babyloniens und Assyrians, p. 345. Another relic of this conquest has been discovered by Hilprecut, Tho Babylonian Expedition, vol. i. p. 31 ; it is an agate tablet dedicated toNinft, for the life of Dungi, King of Uru, by an unknown vicegerent, carried off into Elam, and recovered some time in the XV" century by Kurigalzu. * The submission of Babylon is evident from the title Adda Martu, " sovereign of the ^Ye8t," assumed by several of the Elamite princes (cf. p. 47 of tho present work) : in order to extend his authority beyond the Euphrates, it was necessary for the King of Elam to be first of all master of 38 TEE FIB ST CHALDEAN EMPIRE. absorbed Chaldaea, reducing its states to feudal provinces, and its princes to humble vassals. Kudur-nakhunta having departed, the people of Larsa exerted themselves to the utmost to repair the harm that he had done, and they succeeded but too well, since their very prosperity was the cause only a short time after of the outburst of another storm. Siniddinam, perhaps, desired to shake off the Elamite yoke. Simtishilkhak, one of the successors of Kudur-nakhunta, had conceded the principality of Yamutbal as a fief to Kudur- mabug, one of his sons. Kudur-mabug appears to have been a conqueror of no mean ability, for he claims, in his inscriptions, the possession of the whole of Syria.^ He obtained a victory over Siniddinam, and having dethroned him, placed the administration of the kingdom in the hands of his own son Eimsin.^ This prince, who was at first a feudatory, afterwards associated in the govern- ment with his father, and finally sole monarch after the latter's death, married a princess of Chaldsean blood,^ and by this means legitimatized his usurpation in the eyes of his subjects. His domain, which lay on both sides of the Tigris and of the Euphrates, comprised, besides the principality of Yamutbal, all the towns dependent on Sumer and Accad — Uru, Larsa, Uruk, and Nippur. He acquitted himself as a good sovereign in the sight of gods and men : h& repaired the brickwork in the temple of Nannar at Uru ; * he embellished the temple of Shamash at Larsa, and caused two statues of copper to be cast in honour of the god ; he also rebuilt Lagash and Girsu.^ The city of TJruk had been left a heap of ruins after the withdrawal of Kudur-nakhunta: he set about the work of restoration, constructed a sanctuary to Papsukal, raised the ziggurat of Nana, and consecrated to the goddess an entire set of temple Babylon. In the early days of Assyriology it was supposed that this period of Elamite supremacy coincided with the Median dynasty of Berosus (G. Eawlinson, The Five Great Monarchies, vol. i.. p. 159, et seq. ; Oppeet, Histoire des Empires de Chald^e et d'Assyrie, pp. 10-13). ' His preamble contains the titles adda Marlu (Kawlinson, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. i. pi. 2, No. 3^ 1. 4), "prince of Syria; " adda lamuthal (Id., ibid., pi. 5, No. 16, 1. 9), "prince of Yamutbal." The word adda seems properly to mean " father," and the literal translation of the full title would pro- bably be '■'■father of Syria," "father of Yamutbal," whence the secondary meanings " master, lord, prince" (G. Smith, Early History of Babylonia, in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archseology, vol. i. p. 42), which have been provisionally accepted by most Assyriologists. Tiele {Babylonisch-Assyrische Geschiehte,^^. 123, 124), and Winckler after him (JJntersuchungen zur altori- entalischen Geschichte, p. 37, n. 2), have suggested that Martu is liere equivalent to Yamutbal, and that it was merely used to indicate the western part of Elam ; Winckler afterwards rejected this hypothesis, and has come round to the general opinion {Altorientalische Forschungen, p. 143, et seq.,. and Geschichte Israels, vol. i. pp. 130, 131). ' In regard to the reading of the word Eimsin, cf. p. 29, n. 3, of the present work. His preamble contains the titles " Benefactor of Uru, King of Larsa, King of Shumir and of Accad " (Eawlinson,. Gun. Ins. W. As., vol. i. pi. 5, No. 16, 11. 5-7), " mighty shepherd of Nippur " (Fe. Lenokmant, Ghoix de Textes Cuneiformes in€dits, No. 70, p. 164, 1. 11). ' "WiNCKLEK, Sumer und Accad, in the Mittheilungen des Ale. Orient. Vereins zu Berlin, vol. i. p. 17. Her name, which has been mutilated, was compounded with that of the goddess Ninni (1. 13). * Bricks bearing his name, brought from Mugheir, now in the British Museum (Kawlinson, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. i. pi. 2, No. 3; pi. 5, No. 16); stone plaque from the same source (Id., ibid., pi. 3^ No. 10). ' Kawlinson, Cun. Lis. W. As., vol. iv. pi. 26, Nos. 13, 14 ; cf. G. Smith, Early History cf Baby- lonia, in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archseology, vol. 1. p. 55. KIMSIN AND KEAMMURABI. 39 furniture to replace that carried off by the Elamites.^ He won the adhesion of the priests by piously augmenting their revenues, and throughout his reign dis- played remarkable energy.^ Documents exist which attribute to him the reduction of Durilu, on the borders of Elam and the Chaldsean states ; ^ others contain dis- creet allusions to a perverse enemy who disturbed his peace in the north, and whom he successfully repulsed.* He drove Sinmuballit out of Ishin,^ and this victory so forcibly impressed his contemporaries, that they made it the starting- point of a new semi-official era ; twenty-eight years after the event, private con- tracts still continued to be dated by reference to the taking of Ishin. Sinmu- ballit's son, Khammurabi, was more fortunate. Kimsin vainly appealed for help against him to his relative and suzerain Kudur-lagamar, who had succeeded Simtishilkhak at Susa. Eirasin was defeated, and disappeared from the scene of action, leaving no trace behind him, though we may infer that he took refuge in his fief of Yamutbal." The conquest by Khammurabi was by no means achieved at one blow, the enemy offering an obstinate resistance. He was forced to destroy several fortresses, the inhabitants of which had either risen against him or had refused to do him homage, among them being those of Meir ' and ^lalgu." ' Rawlinson, Cun. Ins. W. A»., vol. iv. pi. 35, No. 6, 11. 16, 17 ; cf. Hommel, Geschichte Bahy- loniens und Assyrieng, p. 359 ; Wikckleb, Imchriften von KSnigen von Sumer und Accnd, in tht> Ketlingehriftliche Bihliothek, vol. iii. pp. 96-99, No. 0. " Rawlinson, Cun. Ing. W. As., vol. i. pi. 3, No. 10 ; cf. Smith, Early Higtory of Babylonia, in the Trangaclions, vol. i. p. 53; Fh. Lenormant, £ludeg Accadiennes, vol. ii. pp. 351-353; Winckleh. Inschri/len von KSnigen von Sumer und Accad, in the Keilinschri/tliche Bibliotheh, vol. iii. pp. 94, 95. » Rawlinson, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. iv. pi. 36, No. 18; cf. G. Smith, Early History of Babylonia, in the Proceedings, vol. i. p. 55; Homsiel, Oeschichie Bdbylonieng und Assyriens, p. 2G1. * Contract dated "tho year in whicli King Rimain [vanquished] tlie perveisc, the enemies" (Meissner, Beitrdge zwn allbabylonischen Privatrecht, pp. 17, 95, 9C); the scribe left the phrase in- complete, the remainder of the formula being suflBciently familiar at the time for the reader to supply it for liimsclf. A variant, indicating that it was a time of peace, is found on another contract of tho same year (Rawlixson, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. iv. pi. 36, No. 2; cf. G. Smith, Early Higlory, in the Transacliong Bib. Arch. Soc, vol. i. p. 55; Hommel, Geschichte Babyloniens, etc , p. 361). Many Assyriologists regard this as indicating a defeat suflfered by Khammurabi (G. Smith, Early History of Baln/lonia, in the Transactions, vol. i. pp. 55-57). The contract published by Meissnbb, Beitrdge zum altbabyl. Privatrecht, pp. 32, 33, proves that the event took place under Sinmuballit. This prince is there stated to have been then alive, an oath in the body of the document being sworn by him and by the town of Sippar, but the date is that of " the year of tho taking of Ishin." ' Contracts dated " tho taking of Ishin " (Meissneii, Beitrdge zum altljabyl. Privatrecht, pp. 32, 33), the year V. (G. Smith, Early History, p. 51), the year VI. (Meissseu, Beitrdge, pp. 40, 41), the years VII., VIII., XIII., XVIII., XXVIII. (G. Smith. Early History, p. 54, where the name is transcribed Karrak). • This is a contract dated the year in which Khammurabi defeated Rinisin, tiianks to the help of Anu and Bel (Rawlinson, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. iv. pi. 36, No. 21 ; cf. G. Smith, Early History of Babylonia, in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archieology,vo\.i. p. 57; Hommel, Gesdtichle Babyloniens U7id Assyriens, pp. 361, 362) ; Jensen (Inschriften aus der Zeit Hammurabi's, in tlio Keilinschriftliclie Bibliotheh, vol. iii. p. 127, note) is, so far as I know, alone in believing that we cannot with any certainty deduce from this passage that Rimsin was really defeated by Khammurabi. A notice of the wars of Rimsin and Kudur-lagamar has been discovered by Pinches (Hommel, Aug der Babylonischen Alterthumskunde, in Die Aula, 1705, vol. i. pp. 551, 552 ; Sayce, Recent Discoveries in Babylonian and Egyptian History, in tho Academy, Sept. 7, 1895, p. 189, and Patriarchal Palestine, iip. v., vi., 61-70). ' Mairu, Meir, has been identified with Shurippak (Fu. Delitzsch, TTo lag das Paradies i p. 224 : Hommel, Geschichte Babyloniens und Assyrieng, p. 414) ; but it is, rather, the town of Mar, now Tell-Id. A and Lagamal, the Elamite Lagamar, were worshipped there. It was tho seat of a linen manu- facture, and possessed largo shipping (Meissneii, Beitrdge zum altbabylonigchen Privatrecht, p. 18). ' Contract dated "the year in which King Khamniurnbi, by order of Anu and Bel, destroyed the 40 THE FIB ST GEALD^AN EMPIRE. When the last revolt had been put down, all the countries speaking the language of Chaldasa and sharing its civilization were finally united into a single kingdom, of which Khammurabi proclaimed himself the head. Other princes who had preceded him had enjoyed the same opportunities, but their efforts had never been successful in establishing an empire of any dura- tion ; the various elements had been bound together for a moment, merely to be dispersed again after a short interval. The work of Khammurabi, on the contrary, was placed on a solid foundation, and remained unimpaired under his successors. Not only did he hold sway without a rival in the south as in the north, but the titles indicating the rights he had acquired over Sumer and Accad were inserted in his Protocol after those denoting his hereditary pos- sessions, — the city of Bel and the four houses of the world. Khammurabi's victory marks the close of those long centuries of gradual evolution during which the peoples of the Lower Euphrates passed from division to unity. Before his reign there had been as many states as cities, and as many dynasties as there were states ; after him there was but one kingdom under one line of kings.^ Khammurabi's long reign of fifty-five years has hitherto yielded us but a small number of monuments — seals, heads of sceptres, alabaster vases, and pompous inscriptions, scarcely any of them being of historical interest. He was famous for the number of his campaigns, no details of which, however, have come to light, but the dedication of one of his statues celebrates his good fortune on the battle-field. " Bel has lent thee sovereign majesty : thou, what awaitest thou ? — Sin has lent thee royalty : thou, what awaitest thou ? — Ninip has lent thee his supreme weapon : thou, what awaitest thou ? — The goddess of light, Ishtar, has lent thee the shock of arms and the fray : thou, what awaitest thou? — Shamash and Ramman are thy varlets : thou, what awaitest thou? — It is Khammurabi, the king, the powerful chieftain — who cuts the enemies in pieces, — the whirlwind of battle — who overthrows the country of the rebels — who stays combats, who crushes rebellions, — who destroys the stubborn like images of clay, — who overcomes the obstacles of inaccessible mountains." ^ The majority of these expeditions were, no doubt, consequent on the victory which walls of Mairu and the walls of Malka " (Rawlinson, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. iv. pi. 36, No. 43 ; cf. G. Smith, Early History of Babylonia, in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, vol. i. p. 59, where Malka, Malgai, is called Malalnak ; Jensen, Inschriften aus der Eegierungszeit Hammurabi's, in the KeilinschriftlicJie Bihlioiheh, vol. iii. pp. 128, 129; Meissneb, Beitrdge zum altbabylonischen Privatrecht, pp. 29, 30, 118, where the name is written E-alkaa, Bit-alka) ; contracts dated simply from the taking of Mairu (Meissneb, Beitrdge zum altbabylonischen Privatrecht, pp. 51, 85). ' DELiTZSCH-MiiEDTEE, GescUclite Babyloniens und Assyriens, 2nd edit, pp. 85-87 ; Tiele, Baby- lonisch-Assyrische Geschichte, pp. 124-127 ; Hommel, Geschichte Babyloniens und Assyriens, pp. 406- 415 ; WiNCKLEE, Geschichte Babyloniens und Assyriens, pp. 60-65. " Amiaud, Une Inscription bilingue de Hammourabi, roi de Babylone, du XV" au XX" siecle avant J.-C, in the Becueil de Travaux, vol. i. pp. 180-190, and L' Inscription bilingue de Hammourabi, in the Revue d'Assyriologie,\o\. ii. p. 10; cf. Jensen, Inschriften aus der Regierungszeit Hammurabi's, in the Keilinschriflliche BibliotheJc, vol. iii. pp. 110-117. THE CONSTRUCTIONS OF KHAMMURABI. 41 destroyed the power of Rimsin. It would not have sufficed merely to drive back the Elamites beyond the Tigris ; it was necessary to strike a blow within their own territory to avoid a recurrence of hostilities, which might have endangered the still recent work of conquest. Here, again, Khammurabi seems to have met with his habitual success. Ashnunak was a border district, and shared the fate of all the provinces on the eastern bank of the Tigris, being held | sometimes by Elam and sometimes by Chaldaea; ' properly speaking, it was a country of Semitic speech, and was governed by viceroys owning allegiance, now to Babylon, now to Susa.^ Kham- murabi seized this province,'-^ and permanently secured its frontier by building along the river a line ^'^'^^ " INO ^ of fortresses surrounded by earthworks.'^ Following the example of his predecessors, he set himself to restore and enrich the temples. The house of Zamama and Ninni, at Kish, was out of repair, and the ziggurat threatened to fall ; he pulled it down and rebuilt it, carrying it to such a height that its sumnlit " reached the heavens." Merodach had delegated to him the government of the faithful, and had raised him to the rank of supreme ruler over the whole of Chaldoea. At Babylon, close to the great lake which served as a reservoir for the overflow of the Euphrates, tlie king restored the sanctuary of Esagilla, the dimensions of which did not appear to him to be proportionate to the growing importance of the city. " He completed this divine dwelling with great joy and delight, he raised the summit to the firmament," and then ' PoGNON, Quelques Itoia du pays d'Achnounnah (in the Mus^on, 1892, pp. 249-253), discovered inscriptions of four of the vicegerents of Ashnunak, which he assigns, with some hesitation, to the time of Khammurabi, rather than to that of the kings of Telloh. Three of tliese names are Semitic, the fourth Sumcrian ; tlie language of the inscriptions bears a resemblance to the Semitic dialect of Chaldaoa (cf. Pinches, Discoveries in Ashnunuah; in the Vabylonian and Oriental Record vol vi pp. 66-68). ' Proof of his conquest of these two countries is afforded by inscriptions on contracts dated "the year in which Ashnunak was inundated, under King Khammurabi " (Rawlinso.v, Gun. Ins W. As vol. iv. pi. 36, Nos. 38, 39 ; cf. G. Smith, Earhj History of Babylonia, in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Arch a)ology, vol. i. pp. 58, 59; Meissneb, Beitriige zum altbahylonischen PriiatrecM, pp. 30-47, 48, 69; Scueil, Notes d'Epigraphie et d' Arcli€ologie Asoynennes, in the Recueilde Travaux, vol. xvii. p. 35). Ashnunak, or Ishuunak, is, according to some documents, the same country as Umliyash (Fit. Delitzscu, Wo lag das Paradiesi pp. 230, 231); the probability is, however, that it was originally an independent province, subsequently incorporated with Umliyash. ' Contract dated «' the year of the great wall of Kar-Shamash " (G. Smith, Early HUtory of Baby- Ionia, in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archfcology, vol. i. p. 59; Meissxek, Beitriige zum altbabylonischen Privatrecht, pp. 34, 35, 51, 56). « Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a rapid sketch made at the British Museum. » Rawluison, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. iv. pi. 36, No. 34; cf. G. Smith, Early History of Babylonia, in tiio Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, vol. i. p. 58; Meissneh, Beilrage zum altbabylonischen Privatrecht, pp. 44-46 ; Hommel, Geschichte Babyloniens and Assyriens, p. 411. The temple was called Emitiursagga, " the house of the image of the god Ninip ; " Zamama of Kish, being identified with Ninip (F«. Delitzsch, Wo lag das Parodies f). Ninni, like Nanft, is a form of I'shtar 42 THE FIRST CHALDEAN EBIPIRE. enthroned Merodach and his spouse, Zarpanit, within it, amid great festivities.^ He provided for the ever-recurring requirements of the national religion by frequent gifts ; the tradition has come down to us of the granary for wheat which he built at Babylon, the sight of which alone rejoiced the heart of the god.^ While surrounding Sippar with a great wall and a fosse, to protect its earthly inhabitants,^ he did not forget Shamash and Malkatu, the celestial patrons of the town. He enlarged in their honour the mysterious Ebarra, the sacred seat of their worship, and " that which no king from the earliest times had known how to build for his divine master, that did he generously for Shamash his master." * He restored Ezida, the eternal dwelling of Merodach, at Borsippa ; ^ Eturkalamma, the temple of Anu, Ninni, and Nana, the suzerains of Kish ; ^ and also Ezikalamma, the house of the goddess Ninna, in the village of Zarilab.'^ In the southern provinces, but recently added to the crown, — at Larsa,^ Urnk, and Uru, — he displayed similar activity. He had, doubtless, a political as well as a religious motive in all he did ; for if he succeeded in winning the allegiance of the priests by the prodigality of his pious gifts, ' Mutilated copy of an inscription of Khammurabi from the library of Assurbanipal (Kawlinson, Gun. Ins. W. As., vol. iv. pi. 18, No. I, in the Transactions, vol. i. pp. 56-59 ; see Hommel, GescMchte Babyloniens und Assyriens, pp. 410, 411). ^ Jensen, Inschriften aus der Begierungszeit Hammurabi's, in the Eeilinschriftliche Bibliothek, vol. iii. pp. 120-123 ; it is a copy of an ancient text made by a scribe of the later Assyrian epoch. ' Cylinder of Khammurabi, col. i. 11. 10-19. Contract dated " the year in which the foundations of the wall of Sippara were laid " (Meissner, Beitrdge zum altbabylonischen Privatrecht, pp. 31, 32). * Menant, Une Nouvelle Inscription de Hammourabi, in the Becueil de Travaux, vol. ii. pp. 73- 85 ; Pe. Delitzsch, Die Sprache der Kossder, pp. 73, 74 ; Hojimel, GescMchte Babyloniens und Assyriens, p. 410 ; Jensen, Inschriften aus der Begierungszeit Hammurabi's, in the Keilinschriftliche Bibliothek, vol. iii. pp. 124-127. ' Cylinders in the British Museum published and translated by Strassmaier-Wincklee, Einige neuveroffentlichte Texte Hammurdbis, Nabopolassars und Nebuhadnezars, in the Zeitschrift fUr Assyrio- logie, vol. ii. pp. 118-123, 174-176; cf. Jensen, Inschriften aus der Begierungszeit Hammurabi's, in the Keilinschriftliche Bibliothek, vol. iii. pp. 116-121. Mention is made of this restoration by Nabonidus, who boasts that he found some of Khammurabi's cylinders among the foundations (Bezold, Two Inscriptions of Nabonidus, in the Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, 1888-89, vol. xi. pp. 94, 95, 99, 100 ; cf. Peisee, Inschriften Nabonid's, in the Keilinschriftliche Bibliothek, vol. iii. pp. 90, 91). ^ Eawlinson, Gun. Ins. W. As., vol. iv. pi. 36, Nos. 35-37 ; cf. G. Smith, Early History of Baby- lonia, in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, vol. i. p. 58 ; Hommel, GescMchte Babyloniens und Assyriens, p. 411 ; Meissner, Beitrdge zum altbabylonischen Privatrecht, pp. 88, 89. ' Eawlinson, Gun. Lis. W. As., vol. i. pi. 4, No. 15, 1 ; cf. Menant, Inscriptions de Hammourabi, roi de Babylone, pp. 72-79, and Babylone et la Ghaldg'e,p. 109; G. Smith, Early History of Babylonia, in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, vol. i. p. 60 ; Fr. Lenormant, Etudes Accadiennes, vol. ii. pp. 356-360 ; Amiaud, Une Inscription non-s^mitique de Hammourabi, in the Journal Asiatique, 1883, vol. xx. pp. 231-244 : Jensen, Inschriften aus der Begierungszeit Hammu- rabi's, in the Keilinschriftliche Bibliothek, vol. iii. pp. 106-109. The ordinary reading of the name of the town in which Khammurabi built this temple is Zarilab or Zerlab (cf. Maspeeo, Dawn of Givilization, p. 562); a text mentioned by Zimmern {Einige Bemerkungen zu den Babylonischen KSmgsinschriften, in the Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie, vol. ii. p. 97) seems, however, to indicate Hallabi as being the proper reading, and this has been adopted by Jensen. The town ought in that case to be sought for in the neighbourhood of Sippara. ^ Brick from Senkereh in the British Museum, Eawlinson, Gun. Ins. W. As., vol. i. pi. 4, No. XV. 2 ; cf. Oppert, Expedition en Mfyopotamie, vol. i. p. 257 ; Menant, Inscriptions de Hammourabi, pp. 68-71 ; Fr. Lenormant, Etudes Accadiennes, vol. ii. pp. 355, 356 ; Jensen, Inschriften aus der Begierungszeit Hammurabi's, in the Keilinichriftliohe Bibliothek, vol. iii. pp. 110, 111. KHAMMUEABI BEGULATES THE SYSTEM OF CANALIZATION. 43 he could count on their gratitude in securing for him the people's obedience, and thus prevent the outbreak of a revolt. He had, indeed, before him a difficult task in attempting to allay the ills which had been growing during centuries of civil discord and foreign conquest. The irrigation of the country demanded constant attention, and from earliest times its sovereigns had directed the work with real solicitude ; but owing to the breaking up of the country into small states, their respec- tive resources could not be combined in sucli general operations as were needed for controlling the inundations and effectually remedying the excess or the scarcity of water. Khammurabi witnessed the damage done to the whole province of Umliyash b' one of those terrible floods which still sometimes ravage the regions of the Lower Tigris,^ and possibly it may have been to prevent the recurrence of such a disaster that he under- took the work of canalization. He was the first that we know of who attempted to organize and reduce to a single system the com- plicated network of ditches and channels which intersected the; territory belonging to the great cities between Babylon and the sea.^ Already, more than half a century previously, Siniddinam had enlarged the canal on which Larsa was situated,-' while Eimsin had provided an outlet for the " River of the Gods " into the Persian Gulf: ''' by the junction of the two a navigable channel was formed between the Euphrates and the marshes, and an outlet was thus made for the surplus waters of the inun- dation. Khammurabi informs us how Anu and Bel, having confided to him the government of Sumer and Accad, and having placed in his hands the reins of power, he dug the N^r-Khammurabi, the source of wealth to the people, which brings abundance of water to the country of Sumir and Accad. " I turned both ' Contracts dated the year of an inundation which laid waste Umliyash (Meissner, Beilrage zum aUbahylonigohen Privatrecht, p. 30) ; cf. in our own time, the inundation of April 10, 1831, which in a single night destroyed half the city of Bagdad, and in which fifteen thousand persons lost their livee either by drowning or by the collapse of tlieir houses. » P. Delattue, in Travaux hydrauUquet en Babylonie, pp. 33-37, was the first to estimate the canal works of Khammurabi at their true value. ' Rawunson, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. i. pi. 5, Xo. x.\., 11. 1-19 ; cf. G. Smith, Early History of Baby- lonia, in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical ArchsBology, vol. u pp. 44, 45 ; Delattbe, Le» Travaux hydrauliques en Babylonie, pp. 32, 33. Another passage referring to this canal is found on a cylinder published and translated by Fb. Delitzsch, Ein Thonkegel Siniddinam's, in the BeitrSge zur Aisyriologie, vol. i. pp. 301, 302. * Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph published by Hilpuecht, Tlie Babylonian] Expe- dition of the University of Penmylvania, vol. i. pi. i.\., No. 20. ' Contract dated " the year the Tigris, river of the gods, was canalized down to the sea " (Meissnkb, Beiir&ge turn allbabylonischen Privatrecht, p. 44 ; cf. G. Smith, Early History of Babylonia, in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archmology, vol. i. p. 55) ; ».e. as far as the point to which the sea then penetrated in the environs of Kornah. FRAGMENT OF . CLAY SEAL OF KHAMMURABI.* 44 THE FIBST CHALDEAN EMPIRE. its banks into cultivated ground, I heaped up mounds of grain and I furnished perpetual water for the people of Sumir and Accad. The country of Sumer and Accad, I gathered together its nations who were scattered, I gave them pasture and drink, I ruled over them in riches and abundance, I caused them to inhabit a peaceful dwelling-place. Then it was that Khammurabi, the powerful king, the favourite of the great gods, I myself, according to the prodigious strength with which Merodach had endued me, I constructed a high fortress, upon mounds of earth ; i,ts summit rises to the height of the mountains, at the head of the Nar-Khammurabi, the source of wealth to the people. This fortress I called Dur-Sinmuballit-abim-ualidiya, the Fortress of Sinmuballit, -the father who begat me, so that the name of Sinmuballit, the father who begat me, may endure in the habitations of the world." ^ This caual of Khammurabi ran from a little south of Babylon, joining those of Siniddinam and Eitnsin, and probably cutting the alluvial plain in its entire length.^ It drained the stag- nant marshes on either side along its course, and by its fertilising effects, the ■dwellers on its banks were enabled to reap full harvests from the lands which pre- viously had been useless for purposes of cultivation. A ditch of minor importance pierced the isthmus which separates the Tigris and the Euphrates in the neigh- bourhood of Sippar.^ Khammurabi did not rest contented with these ; a system of secondary canals doubtless completed the whole scheme of irrigation which he had planned after the achievement of his conquest, and his successors had merely to keep up his work in order to ensure an unrivalled prosperity to the empire. Their efforts in this direction were not unsuccessful. Samsuiluna, the son of Khammurabi, added to the existing system two or three fresh canals, one at least of which still bore his name nearly fifteen centuries later ; * it is men- tioned in the documents of the second Assyrian empire in the time of • Menant, Imcripttona de EammouraM, roi de Bahylone, pp. 13-66, and Manuel de la langue Assyriemie, 2ud edit., pp. 306-313; Jensen, Inschriften aus der Eegierungszeit Hammurabi's, in the Keilinschriftliche BiUiothelc, vol. iii. pp. 122-125. The inscription is now preserved in the Louvre. TMany contracts are dated from the year in which this caual was finished (Meissnek, Beitrage zum althabylmischen Privatrecld, pp. 23, 48, 86). 2 Delattee, Les Travaux liydrauliques en Bahylonie, pp. 35, 36, is of opinion that the canal dug by Khammurabi is the Arakhtu of later epochs (Fe. Delitzsch, Wo lag das Paradies 1 pp. 74-76), ■which began at Babylon and extended as far as the Larsa canal. It must therefore be approxi- mately identified with the Shatt-en-Nil of the present day, which joins Shatt-el-Kaher, the canal of Siniddinam. 2 Cylindre de Rammourahi, col. i. 11. 20-23, in Wincklek-Stkassmaiek, Einige neuveroffentliche Texte Hammurahis, Nahopolaisars, und Nebucadnezars, in the Zeitschri/t fur Assyriologie, vol. ii. ipp. 118-123, wliere it is evidently not the Euphrates which is meant, as Winckler seems to think (of. Ein Text Nahopolassars, in the Zeitschri/t fUr Assyriologie, vol. ii. p. 74). The canal which Kham- murabi caused to be dug or dredged may be the Ni-r-Malka, or "royal canal" (Winckler, Ein Text Nabopolassars, p. 70; Delattre, Les Travaux liydrauliques en Bahylonie, p. 36), which ran from the Tigris to the Euphrates, passing Sippar on the way. The digging of this canal is mentioned in a contract (Meissnee, Beitrage zum altbahylonischen Privatrecld, pp. 89, 90). * Contracts dated " the year of the Nar-Samsuiluna-nagab-nukhshi," i.e. " Caual of Samsuiluna, source of riches " (G. Smith, Early History of Babylonia, in the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, vol. i. pp. 62, 63; Hommel, Gescliichte Babyloniens und Assyrians, p. 416; Meissnee, Jieitrdge zum altbabylonisclien Privatrecld, pp. 53, 54 ; cf. Delattre, Les Travaux liydrauliques en THE LAST KINGS OF TEE BABYLONIAN BTNASTY. 45 Assurbanipal, and it is possible that traces of it may still be found at the present day. Abieshukh,^ Ammisatana,^ Ammizadugga,^ and Samsusatana/ all either continued to elaborate the network planned by their ancestors, or applied themselves to the better distribution of the overflow in those districts where cultivation was still open to improvement. We should know nothing of these kings had not the scribes of those times been in the habit of dating the con- tracts of private individuals by reference to important national events. They appear to have chosen by preference incidents in the religious life of the country ; as, for instance, the restoration of a temple, the annual enthronisation of one of the great divinities, such as Shamash, Merodach, Ishtar, or Nana, as the eponymous god of the current year,'' the celebration of a solemn festival,^ or the consecration of a statue ; ' while a few scattered allusions to works of forti- fication show that meanwhile the defence of the country was jealously watched over.^ These sovereigns appear to have enjoyed long reigns, the shortest extending over a period of five and twenty years; and when at length the death Babylotiie, p. 37). The annalistic tablet S'. IG ia the museum of Constant inople gives, after the year in which the king dug the canal, that in which " tlio canal gave abundance." The canal in question is mentioned in a list of canals and rivers from the library of Assurbanipal (Rawlinson, Cun. Ini. W. As., vol. ii. pi. 51, No. 2, recto, 1. 51 ; cf. Delitzscu, Wo la«* Inscriptiout «n langue eusienne, Essai d'interpr^ation, in the M^tnoiret du Congret international des Orieidalittef a Paris, vol. ii. p. 179) the word Memnon is the equivalent of the Susian Umman-anin, " the house •of the king:" Weissbach (Anzanische Imchriftcn, p. 136) declares that "anin" does not mean king, and contradicts Oppert's view, though he does not venture to suggest a new explanation of the name. ' In regard to Kudur-nakhunta, see what has been said above on pp. 36, 37 of the present work. * Gen. xiv. From the outset Assyriologists liave never doubted the historical accuracy of this chapter, and they have connected the facts which it contains with those which scum to bo revealed ■by the Assyrian monuments. The two Rawlinsons {The Five Great Monarchies of the AitcietU Eastern World, vol. i. p. 61, et seq.) intercalate Kudur-lagamar between Kudur-nakhunta and Kudur-mabug, 48 THE FIRST CHALDEAN EMPIRE. (Chedorlaomer) who helped Rimsia against Khammurabi, but was unable to prevent his overthrow. In the thirteenth year of his reign over the East, the cities of the Dead Sea — Sodom, Gomorrah, Adamah, Zeboim, and Bela — revolted against him : he immediately convoked his great vassals, Amraphel of Chaldsea, Arioch of Ellasar,^ Tida'lo the Guti, and marched with them to the confines of his dominions. Tradition has invested many of the tribes then inhabiting Southern Syria with semi-mythical names and attributes. They are represented as being giants — Eephaim ; men of prodigious strength — Zuzim ; as having a buzzing and indistinct manner of speech — Zamzummim ; as formidable monsters ^— Emim or Anakim, before whom other nations appeared as grass- hoppers ;^ as the Horim who were encamped on the confines of the Sinaitic desert, and as the Amalekites who ranged over the mountains to the west of the Dead Sea. Kudur-lagamar defeated them one after another — the Eephaim near to Ashtaroth-Karnaim, the Zuzim near Ham,* the Emim at Shaveh-Kiriathaim, and the Horim on the spurs of Mount Seir as far as El-Paran ; then retracing his footsteps, he entered the country of the Amalekites by way of En-mish- and Oppert places him about the same period {Eistoire des empires de Chald^e et d'Assyrie d'apres les monuments, pp. 10, 11). Fr. Lenormant regards him as one of the successors of Kudur-mabug, possibly his immediate successor (La Langue primitive de la Ghald^e et les idiomes touraniens, pp. 375, 376). G. Smith does not hesitate to declare positively that the Kudur-mabug and Kudur- nakhunta of the inscriptions are one and the same with the Kudur-lagamar (Chedor-laomer) of the Bible (^Egyptian Campaign of Esarhaddon, in the Zeitsclirift fur yEgyptisclie Sprache, 1868, vol. i. p. 116). Finally, Schrader, while he repudiates Smith's view, agrees in the main fact with the other Assyriologists (Die Keilinschriften und das alle Testament, 2nd edit., pp. 136, 137). We find the same view, with but slight modification, in Delitzsch-Mlirdter (Geschielite Babyloniens und Assyriens, p. 83, note), in Ed. Meyer (GescMchte des Alterthums, vol. i. pp. 165, 166), and in Hommel (GescJdcUe Babyloniens und Assyriens, p. 363, et seq.). On the other hand, the majority of modern Biblical critics have absolutely refused to credit the story in Genesis, e.g. Reuss {L'Hisloire Saint et la Loi, vol. i. pp. 845-350), Noldeke (JJniersuchungen zur Kritih des Alte Testament, p. 156, et seq.), Tiele (Babylonisch-Assyrische Geschichte, pp. 123, 124), Winckler (^GescMchte Babyloniens und Assyriem, p. 48, where Kudur-lagamar is not noticed at all). Sayce (The Higher Criticism, etc., 3rd edit., pp. 160-169) thinks that the Bible story rests on an historic basis, and his view is strongly confirmed by Pinches' discovery of a ChaklsBan document which mentions Kudur-lagamar and two of his allies (Hommel, Aus der Babylonische Alter tumskunde, in Die Aula, 1895, vol. i. p. 552 ; Sayce, Recent Dis- coveries in Babylonian and Egyptian History, in the Academy, Sept. 7, 1895, p. 189, and Patriarchal Palestine, pp. v., vi., 61-76). The Hebrew historiographer reproduced an authentic fact from the chronicles of Babylon, and connected it with one of the events in the life of Abraham. The very late date generally assigned to Gen. xiv. in no way diminishes the intrinsic probability of the facts narrated by the Chaldsean document which is preserved to us in the pages of the Hebrew book. ' Ellasar has been identified with Larsa since the researches of Rawlinson and Norris (Fr. Delitzsch, Wo lag das Paradies ? p. 224 ; Scheadee, Die Keilinschriften und das Alte Testament. 2nd edit., pp. 135, 136); the Goim, over whom Tidal was king, with the Guti (Scheadee, Die Keilinschriften, p. 137). 2 Sayce, The Higher Criticism and the Verdict of the Monuments, 3rd edit., pp. 160, 161, considers Zuzim and Zamzummim to be two readings of the same word Zamzum, written in cuneiform characterij on the original document. The sounds represented, in the Hebrew alphabet, by the letters m and w, are expressed in the Chaldsean syllabary by the same character, and a Hebrew or Babylonian scribe, who had no other means of telling the true pronunciation of a race-name mentioned in the story of this campaign, would have been quite as much at a loss as any modern scliolar to say whether he ought to transcribe the word as Z-m-z-m oras Z-w-z-w; some scribes read it Zu2im,others preferred ZamzMmmim. ^ Numb. xiii. 33. * In Deut. ii. 20 it is stated that the Zamzummim lived in the country of Ammon. Sayce points out that we often find the variant Am for the character usually read Ham oi Kham— the name Khammurabi, KEAMMURABI AND HIS SUCCESSORS IN SYRIA. 49 pat, and pillaged the Amorites of Hazazon-Taraar. In the mean time, the kings of the five towns had concentrated their troops in the vale of Siddim, and were there resolutely awaiting Kudur-lagamar. They were, however, completely routed, some of the fugitives being swallowed up in the pits of bitumen with which the soil abounded, while others with difficulty reached the mountains. Kudur-lagamar sacked Sodom and Gomorrah, re-established his dominion on all sides, and returned laden with booty, Hebrew tradition adding that he was overtaken near the sources of the Jordan by the patriarch Abraham.^ After his victory over Kudur-lagamar, Khammurabi assumed the title of King of Martu,^ which we find still borne by Amraisatana sixty years later.'' We see repeated here almost exactly what took place in Ethiopia at the time of its conquest by Egypt : merchants had prepared the way for military occu- pation, and the civilization of Babylon had taken hold on the people long before its kings had become sufficiently powerful to claim them as vassals. The empire may be said to have been virtually established from the day when the states of the Middle and Lower Euphrates formed but one kingdom in the hands of a single ruler. We must not, however, imagine it to have been a compact territory, divided into provinces under military occupation, ruled by a uniform code of laws and statutes, and administered throughout by functionaries of various grades, who received their orders from Babylon or Susa, according as the chances of war favoured the ascendancy of Chalda-a or Elara. It was in for instance, is often found written Ainmurabi (cf p. 15, n. 5, of the present work); tbo Ham in the narrative of Genesis would, tlicrefore, be identical with the land of Ammon in Deuteronomy, and the difference between the spelling of the two would be due to the fact that the document reproduced in the XIV"' chapter of Genesis had been originally copied from a cuneiform tablet in which the name of the place was expressed by the sign Ham-Am (Sayce, The Higher Ci itici»m, 3rd edit., pp. IGO, ICl). • ' An attempt has been made to identify the three vassuls of Kudur-lagamar with kings mentioned on the Chaldwan monuments. Tidcal, or, if we adopt the Sepluiigint variant, Thorgal, has been considered by some as the bearer of a Sumerian name, Tur-gal = " great chief," " great son " (Oppeut, Histoire des Empires de Chaldge, p. 11), while others i)ut liim on one side as not having been a Baby- lonian (Halevy, Recherches Bibliques, p. 2.^)4, and Notes Sumgriennet, in tiie Ueiue S^milique, vol. ii. pp. 278-280); Pinclies, Sayce, and Ilommel identify him with Tudkhula, an ally of Kudur-lagamar against Khammurabi (Hommel, Aus der Itahylonitchen AUerlumskunde, in Die Aula, 1895, vol. i. p. 552; Sayce, Recent Discoveries, in the Academy, Sept. 7, 1895, p. 189, and Patriarchal Palestine, p. 70). Arioch is Rimaku, Eri-Aku (cf. p. 29, n. 2, of the present work, and Fr. Lenobmant, La Langue primi- tive de la Chald^e,pp. 378, 379; Scuradeh, Die Keilinschri/ten, 2nd edit., pp. 135, 13G; Hommel, Die Semitische Vlilker, p. 48 ; Halevy, Recherches Bibliques, pp. 253, 254, and Notes Sumerienttes, in the Revue S^mititjue, vol. ii. pp. 272-27C). Schrader was tlie first to suggest that Amraphel wng really Khammurabi (Die Keilintchri/tliche Bahylonische Konigslisle, pp. 22-27), and emended the Amraphel of the biblical text into Amraphi or Amrabi, in onier to support this identification. Hale'vy, while on the whole accepting this theory, derives the name from the pronunciation Kim- tarapashtum or Kimtarapaltum, wliich he attributes to the name generally read Khammurabi (Recherches Bibliques, pp. 254-258, 303-315), and in this he is partly supported by Hommel, who reads " Khammurapaltu " (Assyriological Notes, in the Proceedings of Soc. of Bibl. Arch., vol. xvi. p. 212). ' It is, indeed, the sole title which ho attributes to himself oh a stone tablet now in the British Museum ; cf. Winckleh, Allorientalische Forschungen, pp. 145, 140. ' In an inscription by this prince, copied probably about the time of Nabonidus by the scribe Bolushallim, he is called "king of the vast land of Martu" (Pinches, Text of Ammisalana, King of Babylon, from about 2115 to Q090 B.C., in the Records of the Past, 2nd series, vol. v. pp. 102-105). £ 50 TEE FIRST CEALDJEAN EMPIRE. I reality a motley assemblage of tribes and principalities, whose sole bond of union was subjection to a common yoke. They were under obligation to pay tribute, and furnish military contingents and show other external marks of obedience, but their particular constitution, customs, and religion were alike respected : they had to purchase, at the cost of a periodical ransom, the right to live in their own country after their own fashion, and the head of the empire forbore all interference in their affairs, except in cases where their internecine quarrels and dissensions threatened the security of his suzerainty. Their subordination lasted as best it could, sometimes for a year or for ten years, at the end of which period they would neglect the obligations of their vassalage, or openly refuse to fulfil them : a revolt would then break out at one point or another, and it was necessary to suppress it without delay to prevent the bad example from spreadhig far and wide.^ The empire was maintained by perpetual re-conquests, and its extent varied with the energy shown by its chiefs, or with the resources which were for the moment available. Separated from the confines of the empire by only a narrow isthmus, Egypt loomed on the horizon, and appeared to beckon to her rival. Her natural fertility, the industry of her inhabitants, the stores of gold and perfumes which she received from the heart of Ethiopia, were well known by the passage to and fro of her caravans, and the recollection of her treasures must have fre- quently provoked the envy of Asiatic courts.^ Egypt had, however, strangely declined from her former greatness, and the line of princes who governed her had little in common with the Pharaohs who had rendered her name so formidable under the XIP" dynasty. She was now under the rule of the Xoites, whose influence was probably confined to the Delta, and extended merely in name over the Said and Nubia.^ The feudal lords, ever ready to reassert their ' Cf. the account of the revolt of the kings of the valley of Siddim against Kudur-lagamar (pp. 48, 49 of the present work), which, if not absolutely accurate in every detail, gives nevertheless a very clear idea of what the Elamite or Chaldsean rule meant in these early epochs; we shall come upon the same state of things later on at the time of the Egyptian conquest. " As we proceed, we shall continually meet indications, in letters written by Asiatic princes, of the existence of this idea that Egypt was a kind of El Dorado where gold was as plentiful as dust upon the high-road (Delattre, Manages priuciers en Egypte, in the Rev. des Quest, hist, vol. 1. p. 231). ' See what is said concerning the Xoites in Maspeeo, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 533, 534. I may recall the fact that Lepsius placed the Hyksos invasion first at the end of the XII"' dynasty and then at the beginning of the XIII"' (Konigshueh der Alten Mgypter, p. 21, et seq.), and that his theory, at first adopted by Buusen (^Mgyptens Stelle in der Weltgeschichte, vol. iii. p. 9, et seq.), by Lieblein (JEgypt. Chron., pp. 02-76, and Recherches sur la Chron. £gypt., pp. 84-135), was vigorously contested by E. de Rouge' {Examen de V Ouvrage de M. de Bunsen, ii. pp. 35-59). It has gradually been abandoned by most Egyptologists, and finally by Naville (Bubastis, pp. 15, 16). The history of the Hyksos has been dealt with by Chabas {Les Pasteurs en Egypte, 1868) in a special monograph, then by Padre Gesare di Cara {Gli Hylcsds di Egitto, 1889), who collected with much care and discussed at great length all the references to them contained in the texts of ancient writers and in all the Egyptian documents ; finally, Naville devotes a chapter in his Bubastis, pp. 16-29, to the history of the shepherd kings. Here, as in the preceding pages, the materials are so scanty that we are obliged to fall back on conjecture in endeavouring to interpret them and to work out the elements of a connected narrative; from the various hypotheses I have chosen those which appeared to be the simplest and best adapted to the scope of my work. TEE HYKSbs INVASION. 51 independence as soon as the central power waned, shared between them the possession of the Nile valley below Memphis : the princes of Thebes, who were probably descendants of Usirtasen, owned the largest fiefdom, and though some slight scruple may have prevented them from donning the pschent or placing their names within a cartouche, they assumed notwithstanding the plenitude of royal power. A favourable opportunity was therefore offered to an invader, and the Chaldfeans might have attacked with impunity a people thus divided among themselves.* They stopped short, however, at the southern frontier of Syria, or if they pushed further forward, it was without any important result: distance from head-quarters, or possibly reiterated attacks of the Elamites, prevented them from placing in the field an adequate force for such a momentous undertaking. What they had not dared to venture, others more audacious were to accomplish. At this juncture, so runs the Egyptian record, " there came to us a king named Timaios.''^ Under this king, then, I know not wherefore, the god caused to blow upon us a baleful wind, and in the face of all probability bands from the East, people of ignoble race, came upon us unawares, attacked the country, and subdued it easily aiid without fighting." ^ It is possible that they owed this rapid victory to the presence in their armies of a factor hitherto unknown to the African — the war-chariot— and before the horse and his driver the Egyptians gave way in a body.^ The invaders appeared ' The theory that tlie divisious of Ejrypt, under the XIV"' ilynnsty, auil the disconls between iU feudatory princes, were one of the main causes of the success of the Sliepherds (MAsrKRO, llittoire Ancienne des Peupleg de I'Orient, 4th edit, p. 1C2), i.s now admitted to be correct, amongst others, by Ed. Meyku, Geechichte JEgyptem, p. 201, et seq., and by Navim.e, Bubatlis, pp. Id, 20. " Fruin emended vfi'iv Tlfiaios in the text of Manetho into 'Aixaxiiaios or 'Antvfixijs (Maiitthonit Sebennytx Reliq., pp. 53-55), and Lepsius first identified this new Amenemes witli the last Pharaoh of the XII"' dynasty, Amenemhait IV., then with the third king of the XIII"', Ua-Amenemhait (KSnigshuch, j). 24). Bunsen (JKgyptens Stelle, vol. iii. p. 42, note 5) suggeets the emendatiou 'Anoui/rttiaios ; as the sole object of this is to identify the name of the king defeated by the shepherds with that of 'A/iovedpraios, mentioned by Eratosthenes, I do not think it worth accepting. We know too little of Manetho's style to be able to decide a priori whether tiie phrase 'E-yfVfTo fiacriAfvs ri/iin Ti'/xaio; 6vona ia Or is not in harmony with his manner of narrating historical facts; the phrase is correct, and that should be enough to deter us from altering it, at any rate in our present stage of knowledge. ' Manetuo, in Mulleb-Didot, Fragmeida Historicorum Grxcorum, voL ii. p. 5CG. The apparent contradiction between the terms in which Manetho explains the conquest of Egypt, ^aJi'oit d/taxi7Tl TauTTji/ Kara Kpdros eiKov, has been noticed and cx)ilained by FuuiN, Mamthonit Sebennylx Reliquim, J). 59 : Padre di Cara {Gli Bylctog o Re I'astori di Egitto, p. 2'.>3, et seq.) sees in it a proof that the Ilyksos had not been guilty of the atrocities of which the Egyptians accused them. * The horse was unknown, or at any rate had not been employed in Egypt prior to the invasion (cf. Maspeuo, Daten of Civilization, p. 32, note 2); we find it, however, in general use immediately after the expulsion of the Shepherds, see the tomb of Pihiri (Cha.mi>ollion, Monuments de VKgypte H de la Nubie, pi. cxlv. 1, and vol. i. p. 2G8 ; Rosellini, Monuvwtiti Civili, pi. cxvi. 5, vol. iii. pp. 238- 240; Lepsius, Denkmdler, iii. 10 a'""). Moreover, all historians agree in admitting that it was introduced into the country under the rule of the Shepherds (Prisse d'Avennes, Ve» Chevaux chez let Anciens fjgyptiens, in Perron, Le. Nuffyi, vol. i. pp. 128-135; Fn. Lenormant, Les Premieres Civilitatiom, vol. i. pp. 299-305; Pietremekt, Le« CAeraux dant les tempt antfhiitoriquetet hitloriquet, p. 459, (!t seq.; Ed. Meyer, Geschichte JEgypient, pp. 210, 211). The use of the war-chariot in (;halda;a at an epoch prior to the llyktos invasion, is proved by a fragment of the Vulture Stele (cf. Maspero, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 006,607,722); it is, therefore, natural to suppose that the Hyksue used the chariot in war, and that the rapidity of their conquest was due to it. 52 TEE ETKSbs IN EGYPT. as a cloud of locusts on the banks of the Nile, Towns and temples were alike pillaged, burnt, and ruined • they massacred all they could of the male popula- tion, reduced to slavery those of the women and children whose lives they spared, and then proclaimed as king Salatis, one of their chiefs.^ He established a semblance of regular government, chose Memphis as his capital, and imposed a tax upon the vanquished.^ Two perils, however, immediately threatened the security of his triumph : in the south the Theban lords, taking matters into their own hands after the downfall of the Xoites, refused the oath of allegiance to Salatis, and organised an obstinate resistance ; ^ in the north he had to take measures to protect himself against an attack of the Chaldaeans or of the Elamites who were oppressing Chaldaea.* From the natives of the Delta, who were temporarily paralysed by their reverses, he had, for the moment, little to fear : restricting himself, therefore, to establishing forts at the strategic points in the Nile valley in order to keep the Thebans in check, he led the main body of his troops to the frontier on the isthmus. Pacific immigrations had already introduced Asiatic settlers into the Delta, and thus prepared the way for securing the supremacy of the new rulers : in the midst of these strangers, and on the ruins of the ancient town of Hawarit-Avaris,^ in the Sethroite nome — * The name Salatis (var. Saites) seems to be derived from a Semitic word, Shalit = " the chief," " the governor ; " this was the title which Joseph received when Pharaoh gave him authority over the whole of Egypt {Gen. xli. 43). Salatis may not, therefore, have been the real name of the first Hyksos king, but his title, which the Egyptians misunderstood, and from which they evolved a proper name : Uhlemann has, indeed, deduced from this that Manetho, being familiar with the passage referring to Joseph, had forged the name of Salatis (Israeliten und Hyhsus in JEgypten, p. 76). Ebers imagined that he could decipher the Egyptian form of this prince's name on the Colossus of Tell-Mokdam (^gypten und die Bucher Moses, p. 202; cf. Ed. Meyer, Set-Typlwn, p. 56; Lauth.^ms JEgijptens Vorzeit, p, 229), where Naville has since read with certainty the name of a Pharaoh of the XIII"> and XIV" dynasties, Nahsiri {LeBoi Neliasi, in the Recueil de Travaux, vol. xv. pp. t) 7-101). ^ Manetho, in Mullek-Didot, Fragmenta Eistoricorum Greecorum, vol. ii. pp. 560, 567. ' The test of Manetho speaks of taxes which he imposed on the high and low lauds, rVjc re &vu Kal Kara) x'^P""') which would seem to include the Thebaid in the kingdom; it is, however, stated in the next few pages that the successors of Salatis waged an incessant war against the Egyptians, which can only refer to hostilities against the Thebans. We are forced, therefore, to admit, either that Manetho took the title of lord of the high and low lands which belonged to Salatis, literally, or that the Thebans, after submitting at first, subsequently refused to pay tribute, thus provoking a war. * Manetho here speaks of Assyrians ; this is an error which is to be explained by the imperfect state of historical knowledge in Greece at the time of the Macedonian supremacy. We need not for this reason be led to cast doubt upon the historic value of the narrative (Wiedemann, Mgyptische Geschiclde, p. 298) : we must remember the suzerainty which Ihe kings of Babylon exercised over Syria (cf. p. 47, et seq., of the present work), and read Chaldseans where Manetho has written Assyrians. In Herodotus " Assyria " is the regular term for " Babylonia," and Babylonia is called " the laud of the Assyrians " (ii. 193). * The manuscripts of Josephus placed this town in the Saite nome ; this error of a copyist is easily corrected from the royal lists, where the Sethroite nome is indicated (Manetho, in MiiLLER-DiDOT, Frag. Eist. Grasc, vol. ii. p. 567). The first commentators on Manetho placed Avaris on the site of Pelusium (Marsham, Can. C/tron., Lipsiae, 1676, pp. 107, 108; Zoega, De Origine OfteZ/sc, pp. 577, 578), relying on the fact that Chseremon (Fragm. 1, in Muller-Didot, Frag., vol. iii. p. 495) names Pelusium as the town which Manetho and Ptolemy of Mendes (Fragm. 1, in MijLLER-DiDOT, Frag., vol. iv. p. 485) call Avaris. I/archer identified it with Heroopolis, and ChampoUion (L'Egypie sous les Pharaons, vol. ii. pp. 87-92) endeavoured to support this view by evidence derived from Egyptian mythology ; finally Lepsius connected Avaris with the name of the Hebrews, and tried to make out that it had been occupied by that people during their sojourn in Egypt (Chron. der JEgypter, p. 341). TEE ENTRENCHED CAMP AT AVARIS. 53 a place connected by tradition with the myth of Osiris and Typhon — fSalatis constructed an immense entrenched camp, capable of sheltering two hundred and forty thousand men. He visited it yearly to witness the military man- ceuvres, to pay his soldiers, and to preside over the distribution of rations. This permanent garrison protected him from a Chalda3an invasion, a not unlikely event as long as Syria remained under the supremacy of the Babylonian kings ; it furnished his successors also with an inexhaustible supply of trained soldiers, thus enabling them to complete the conquest of Lower Egypt. Years elapsed before the princes of the south would declare themselves vanquished, and five kings — Bnon, Apachnas, ApOphis I., launas, and Asses — passed their lifetime " in a perpetual warfare, desirous of tearing up Egypt to the very root." ^ These Theban kings, who were continually under arms against the barbarians, were sub- sequently classed in a dynasty by themselves, the XV"' of Manetho, but they at last succumbed to the invader, and Asses became master of the entire country. His successors in their turn formed a dynasty, the XVI"', the few remaining monuments of which are found scattered over the length and breadth of the valley from the shores of the Mediterranean to the rocks of the first cataract.^ Til* Egyptians who witnessed the advent of this Asiatic people called Tiie hieroglyphic name for the town of Taiiis was added by Champollion {Diet. Eifr., p. IIG); then E. do Rouge read it as "Zan," which seemed to confirm the assimilation theory; then the same scholar discovered tlie true reading, Hiwarit, and at once proposed to recognise in this name the original of Avaris, while still continuing to identify the site with that of Tanis (Summary of a lecture : see the Ath€nxum Frangais, 1854, p. 532). This conjecture found general acceptance, but doubts were expressed in regard to the identity of the two cities, and it was rightly pointed out that in the text of Manetho Avaris is described as an entrenched camp. Lopsius, returning to the old theory, proposed to look for the site in the environs of Pelusium {KOnig$buch, p. 45, note 1), and was not long in locating it among the ruins of Tell-H6r, the name of which city would probably hr derived from that of Hawaret {Enldeckung eines bilingues Dehretes. in the Zeittchri/l, 18G6, pp. 31, .32). Ebers (fiurch Go«en, etc., pp. 73, 74) recognised evenTelu8ium,and consequently Avaris, in Tell HOr. This hypothesis, approved by Chabas {Let Pasteurs en Egypte, p. 42), does not seem to be in favour at present; the only person who appears to support it is Padre di Cara (Gli Eykt6$, p. 332, et seq.). HiXwarit is placed either at Tunis (Bi!UG.sch, lieilrSge iiber Tanis, in the Zeit»chri/l, 1872, pp. 10, 20, Did. ggog., pp. 143, 144), or in the neighbourhooil of Daphntn (Ed. Metek, Ge$ch. JEgyptcns, p. 207), or at Migdol Tell-es-Semflt (Biiugsch, Die /Egyptologie, p. 36). ' None of these five kings have left monuments which can be identified with certainty, unless, indeed, we agree with Naville in supposing that Kliiani (cf. pp. 59, 60 of the present work) represents Annas or lannas (Bubastis, pp. 23-26). Deve'ria (Leilre ii M-Aiigufle Marietle, etc., in the i?ei;M€ Arch/o!., 1861, vol. iv. pp. 253-256) thought he could recognise three of them— Bnon, Apakhna8,and Ap<>|)hi8— in the three half-effaced names on fragment No. 112 of the royal canon at Turin (Lepsius, Autwahl, etc., pi. viii.) ; he connected fragment No. 150, on whicli he made out tlie name of the god Sit, with the same series. His hypothesis was accepted by Pleyte (La ReligUm des Pr^-hraelites, p. 35), and Lautii, who had made the same suggestion almost simultaneously with Deve'ria, adiled to the two fragments 112- 150 fragment 144, on which he thought ho could deciplu r traces of the name Salati.s (Manetho und der Turiner Kunigspapyi us, p. 247) ; the theory is now only accepted with large reserves. Lauth ha"■" Internal. Orieut.-Congr. zu Berlin, A/rir. Sekt. pp. 78, 7'J. ' Mariette, who was tlie first to describe these curious monuments, recognised in them all the incontestable characteristics of a Semitic type {Letlre a M. le Vicomte de Uongi sur let fouillet dv Tanis, pp. 9, 10), and the correctness of his view was, at first, universally admitted (Fr. Lenormant, Manuel de VHistoire Ancienne des Peuples de VOrient, 3rd edit., vol. i. p. 365). Later on Hamy imagined that he could distinguish traces of Mongolian influences, and Fr. Lenormant (Lc* Premiires Civilisations, vol. i. p. 207; Frammeuto di statua di una de' lie Paslori di Egitto, pp. 13, 14; and Histoire Ancienne, 9th edit., vol. ii. p. 145), and then Mariette himself (Pietbement, Le$ Chevaux dans Ics temps prihistoriques et historiqucs, pp. 474, 475) came round to this view ; it has recently been supported in England by Flower, and in Germany by Virchow. • ViREY, Notice des Principauz Monuments exposes an Mus€e de Gizeh, p. 45, No. 138. ' Mariette, Notice des Principaux Monuments, 1864, p. 64, No. 9, and Monuments divers, pi. 39a, Texle, p. 11 ; Maspeuo, Guide du Visiteur au Mus€e de lioulaq. No. 109, pp. 65, 66. ' Mariette, Deuxieme Letlre ti M. le Vicomte de Rouge sur les fouilles de Tunis, pp. 5-7, pis. v., vi., and Notice sur les Principaux Monuments, 1864, No. 14, pp. 264, 265. The group really belongs to the XXI"' dynasty (Maspero, Arch^ologie Egyptienne, p. 217), aud in many respects reminds us of a number of specimens of Cypriot art. " Fb. Lenormant, Frammento di Statua di uno de' Re Pastori di Egilto (extract from the Bollettino Aroheologico Comunale di Roma, 1877, vol. v., 2nd series). 56 THE ETKSbs IN EGYPT. type of face is also found to exist among the present inhabitants of the villages scattered over the eastern part of the Delta, particularly on the shores of Lake Menzaleh, and the conclusion was drawn that these people were the direct descendants of the Hyksos.^ This theory was abandoned, however, when it was ascertained that the sphinxes of San had been carved, many centuries before the invasion, for Amenemhait III.,^ a king of the XIP'^ dynasty. In spite of the facts we possess, the problem therefore still remains unsolved, and the origin of the Hyksos is as mysterious as ever. We gather, however, that the third millennium before our era was repeatedly disturbed by considerable migratory movements. The expeditions far afield of Elamite and Ohaldaean princes could not have taken place without seriously perturbing the regions over which they passed. They must have encountered by the way many nomadic or unsettled tribes whom a slight shock would easily displace. An impulse once given, it needed but little to accelerate or increase the movement : a collision with one horde reacted on its neighbours, who either displaced or carried others with them, and the whole multitude, gathering momentum as they went, were precipitated in the direction first given.^ A tradition, picked up by Herodotus on his travels, relates that the Phoenicians had originally peopled the eastern and southern shores of the Persian Gulf ; ^ it was also said that Indathyrses, a Scythian king, had victoriously scoured the whole of Asia, and had penetrated as far as Egypt.^ Either of these invasions may have been the cause of the Syrian migration. In comparison with the meagre information which has come down to us under the form of legends, it is provoking to think how much actual fact has been lost, a tithe of which would explain the cause of the movement and the mode of its execution. The least improbable hypothesis is that which attributes the appearance of the Shepherds about the XXIIP'^ century B.C., to the arrival in Naharaim of those Khati who subsequently fought so obstinately against the armies both of the Pharaohs and the Ninevite kings. They descended from the * MarieTte, Lettre a M. le Vicomte de Boug€ sur les fouilles de Tanis, pp. 10, 11, and Note sur les Biahmites et les Baschmourites, in the Melanges d'Arch^ologie Egyptienne et Assyrienne, vol. i. pp. 91-93. * GoLENiscHEFF, Amenemhd III et les Sphinx de San, in the Becueil de Travaux, vol. xv. pp. 131- 136 ; cf. Maspero, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 502, 503. ' The Hyksos invasion has been regarded as a natural result of the Elamite conquest, by Maspkro, Eietoire Ancienne des Peuples de V Orient, 1st edit., p. 173; later by Fk. Lenormant, Frammento di un Statua di uno de' Be Pastori di Egitto, p. 14, and Eistoire Ancienne des Peuples de I'Orient, 9th edit., vol. ii. pp. 144; by Ed. Meyek, GescMchle des AUerthums, vol. i. pp. 166, 167; by Hommel, Geschichte Babyloniens und Assyriens, pp. 370, 371 ; and by Naville, Buhastis, pp. 18, 19, 28, 29. * Herodotus, I. i., VII. Ixsxix. It was to the exodus of this race, in the last analysis, that I have attributed the invasion of tlie shepherds (Eistoire ancienne, 4th edit., pp. 161, 162). * Megasthbnes, fragm. 2, in MOller-Didot, Frag. Eist. Grxc, vol. ii. p. 416; cf. Strabo, XV. 1, § 6, p. 687, and Arrianus, Indica, v. § 6; Justinus, i. 1. A certain number of commen- tators are of opinion that the wars attributed to Indathyrses have been confounded with what Herodotus tells of the exploits of Madyes (IV. ciii., et seq.), and' are nothing more than a distorted remembrance of the great Scythian invasion which took place in the latter half of the VIl"" century B.C. PROBABLE IDENTIFICATION WITH THE KHATL 57 mountain region in which the Halys and the Euphrates take their rise, and if the bulk of them proceeded no further than the valleys of the Taurus and the Amanos, some at least must have pushed forward as far as the provinces on the western shores of the Dead Sea. The most adventurous among them, reinforced by the Canaanites and other tribes who had joined them on their southward course, crossed the isthmus of Suez, and finding a people weakened by discord, experienced no difficulty in replacing the native dynasties by their own barbarian chiefs.^ Both their name and origin were doubtless well known to the Egyptians, but the latter nevertheless disdained to apply to them any term but that of " shemau,"^ strangers, and in referring to them used the same vague appellations which they applied to the Bedouin of the Sinaitic peninsula, — Monatiu, the shepherds, or Satiu, the archers. They succeeded in hiding the original name of their conquerors so thoroughly, that in the end they themselves forgot it, and kept the secret of it from posterity. The remembrance of the cruelties with which the invaders sullied their conquest lived long after them ; it still stirred the anger of Manetho after a lapse of twenty centuries.^ The victors were known as the " Plagues " or " Pests,"* and every possible crime and impiety was attributed to them. But the brutalities attending the invasion once past, the invaders soon lost their barbarity and became raj)idly civi- lized. Those of them stationed in the encampment at Avaris retained a hvksu» the military qualities and characteristic energy of their race; the remainder became assimilated to their new compatriots, and were soon ' Makiette, Aperpt, de V Hhloirc de Vhqypte, 1874, pp. 49-54, 172-17"), deliberately coinmitteil him- self to this view, and I'adre Cesahe di Caha, Gli Uyhtot di Egitlo, has written in support of it. At the present time, those scholars who admit the Turanian origin of the llyksos are of opinion that only tiie nucleus of the race, tiie royal tribe, was composed of Mongols, while the main bmly consisted of elements of all kinds — Canaanitish, or, more generally, Semitic (Xavii.le, /iufc(i»i Pasteur s, p. 35): he rightly refused, however, to rocogniso in Sutikhtt or Sutkhtt— the name of the conquerors' god — a transliteration of the Phooiiician Sydyk, and would only see in it that of the nearest Egyptian deity. This view is now accepted as the right one, and Sutkhd is regarded ns thu indigenous equivalent of the great Asiatic god, elsewhere called Baal, or supreme lord. [Professor Petrie found a scarab bearing the cartouche of " Sutekh " Apepi I. at Koptos. — Tii.] * For the aspect of the god Sit, cf. Maspero, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 102, 103, 132-135. ' Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by E. Brugsch ; cf. Mariette, Monuments divi m, pi. 38. ♦ Fragment of an inscription which states that Apophis raised columns and had a metal door made for liis god (Naville, Buhaslis, pis. 22, 23, pis. xxii. A, xxxv. B, C), i.e. for Sutikhft. ' As to the restoration or building of temples at Tanis, cf. Mariette, Leltre a M. le Vicomte ile Rouge sur lea fouilles de Tani», p. 8, etseq. ; and Fi.inder.s Petrik, Tanii, i. pp. 7, 8, 9, and ii. pp. 16, 3;i. " The cartouche name of this king, wrongly deciphered at first by Mariette {Deuxiemc Lettn it M. le Vicomte de Roug€, p. 4) and by E. de Rouge' (E. and J. i>e Rouoii, Imcrip. Hig'rogl. recueillies en iSgypte, pi. Ixxvi. ; Eomou, Lemons de M. dc Roug^, in tiie Melanges d'Arch. fCgypt. et Assyriennc, vol. ii. p. 283), was afterwards restored to its true form by Mariette himself (Miller-Mariette, £tudr sur une Inscription grecque, in the Melanges d' ArcMologie, vol. i. p. 56), and liis reading A(inunri, adopted by Brugsch {Geschichte JSgyptens, p. 824), has since been accepted by all subsequent writers. The old reading still reappears in the work of Padre Cesare di Cara {Gli Hyhtos di Egitlo, p. 312) side by side with the true reading. ' Table of offerings discovered at Cairo, and brought thither from Heliopolis or Memphis, or perhaps from Tanis (Mariette, Momments divers, pi. 38) ; statues and sphinx usurped at Tanis itself (Burton, Excerpla hieroglyphica, pi. 40 ; Mariette, Notice des Princip. Mon., 1876, p. 262, No. 6, 264, Nos. 11-13); sphinx usurped at Tell el-Maskhtttah (Maspero, Sur deux monuments nouveaux 60 THE EYKSbs IN HQYPT. Manetho, was not, however, so easily satisfied.^ The statue bearing his inscription, of which the lower part was discovered by Naville at Bubastis, appears to have been really carved for himself or for one of his contemporaries. It is a work possessing -^^ -V . no originality, though of very commend- ^ able execution, such as would render it - acceptable to any museum ; the artist who conceived it took his inspiration THE BAGDAD LION, IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM.^ with considerable cleverness from the best examples turned out by the schools of the Delta under the Sovkhotpus and the Nofirhotpus. But a small grey granite lion, also of the reign of Khiani, which by a strange fate had found its way to Bagdad, does not raise our estima- tion of the modelling of animals in the Hyksos period. It is heavy in form, and the muzzle in no way recalls the fine profile of the lions executed by the sculptors of earlier times. The pursuit of science and tlie culture of learning appear to have been more successfully perpetuated than the fine arts ; a treatise on mathematics, of which a copy has come down to us, would seem to have been recopied, if not remodelled, in the twenty-second year of Apophis II. Ausirri.^ du regne de Eamses II., pp. 1, 2, where the sphinx is given, thougli attention is not called to the fact that it had been usurped) ; usurped sphinx in the Louvre (Deveeia, Lettre a M. A. Mariette sur quelques mon. relatifs aiix Hyq-Sos, in the Eevue Arch., 2nd series, vol. iv., 1861, pp. 260, 261). ' Naville, Bubastis, pi. xii., xxxv. A, and pp. 23-26, who reads the name Eayan or Yanra, and thinks that this prince must be the Annas or lannas mentioned by Manetho (MijLLER-DiDOT, Frag. Hist. Grxc, vol. ii. p. 567) as being one of the six shepherd-kings of the XV'" dynasty. Mr. Petrie proposed to read Khian, Khiani, and the fragment discovered at Gebelein confirms this reading (Daressy, Notes et Bemarques, in the Mecueil, vol. xvi. p. 42, § Ixxxviii.), as well as a certain number of cylinders and scarabs (Fl. Petrie, Hist. Scarabs, pi. 25). Mr. Petrie prefers to place this Pharaoh in the VIII'" dynasty {Hist, of Egypt, vol. i. pp. 117-121), and makes him one of the leaders in the foreign occupation to which he supposes Egypt to have submitted at that time (as to this point, cf. Maspero, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 440, 441) ; but it is almost certain that he ought to be placed among the Hyksos of the XVI"' dynasty (Steindorff, Zur Gesch. der Hijlcsos, pp. 4, 5). The name Khiani, more correctly Khiyani or Kheyaui, is connected by Tomkins (.Irl. Anthropological Institute, 1889, p. 185), and Hilprecht {Assyriaca, vol. i. p. 130, note 2) with that of a certain Khayanft or Khayan, son of Gabbar, who reigned in Amanos in the time of Salmanasar II., King of Assyria. * Drawn by Boudier, from a sketch made in the British Museum. This miniature lion was first brought into notice by Deve'ria {Lettre a M. Auguste Mariette sur quelques monuments relatifs aux Hyq-Sos, in the Eevue ArcMologique, new series, vol. iv. pp. 256, 257), who read the cartouche Ea-sit-nUb; it was reproduced by Pleyte (La Religion des Pr€-Israelile», pi. i. fig. 9), from De'veria's sketch, and was bought for the British Museum by G. Smith, who believed he could detect on it the name of Salatis {Assyrian Discoveries, p. 420). Mr. Tomkins made a new drawing of it, and published it in his Studies on the Times of Abraham, pi. xi. pp. 140-142. The discovery of the true reading of the cartouche, Susiruiri, and its identification with the cartouche-prenomen of Khiani, are due to Griflath (Naville, Bubastis, pp. 24, 25). Ed. Meyer {Geschichte des AUerthums, vol. i. p. 136) con- siders this lion not to be Egyptian work at all, but pseudo-Egyptian, and that it was executed in Asia; the head, which had been mutilated, has been restored at a much later date, and has thus lost its ancient character, but the body shows it to have been of pure Egyptian origin. ' The cartouche-name Ausirri, which is only to be found in the papyrus, was pointed out by Birch {Geometric Papyrus, in the Zeitschrift, 1868, p. 109), who did not classify it; Eisenlohr recog- nised the fact that it must date from the time of the XVII"" dynasty {Ueber altagyptische Maasse, in the Zeitschrift, 1876, p. 4<1, and Ein Mathemaiisches Handbuch der Alten .SSgypter, pp. 7, 8), and THE MONUMENTS OF KHIANI. 61 If we only possessed more monuments or documents treating of this period, we should doubtless perceive that their sojourn on the banks of the Nile was instrumental in causing a speedy change in the appearance and character of the Hyksos. The strangers retained to a certain extent their coarse countenances and rude manners : they showed no aptitude for tilling the soil or sowing grain, but delighted in the marshy expanses of the Delta, where they gave themselves up to a semi-savage life of hunting and of tending: cattle. The nobl( s among them, clothed ami schooled after tlie Egyii- tian fashion, and holding fiefs, or positions at court, differed but little from the native feudal cliiefs. We see here a case of wliat generally happens when a horde of bar- barians settles down in a highly organised country which by a stroke of fortune they may have conquered : as soon as the Hyksos had taken complete possession of Egypt, Egypt in her turn took possession of them, and those who survived the enervating effect of her civilization were all but transformed into Egyptians. If, in the time of the native Pharaohs, Asiatic tribes had been drawn towards Egypt, where they were treated as subjects or almost as "slaves," finally showed, ou the evidence of Stern, that it helouged to one of the Apophis {An Histoxical .Vonu- ment, in the Froceedingtot the Soc. of Bibl. Arch., 1881, pp. 97, 98). It is thus placed in the XVI"' dynasty (WiEDKMANN, jEgyptisehe Geschichle, pp. 293, 294), and the hypothesis is confirmed by a monu- ment of Apophis II. iu the 8o\ith of Egypt, at (iebclein (Daisessy, Notes et Remarques, § sxx., in the Recueil de Travaux, vol. xii. p. 26). The treatise had been composed under Amcnomhuit III. (Gkif- FiTU, The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus, in the Proceedings of the fEito, Lt» Conlet pupu- laires de I'Egypte ancienne, 2nd edit., pp. 287-290). In one of these fragments, preserved in the Louvre, mention is made of Hotpflri's tomb, certainly situated at Thebes (Id., ibid., pj). 291, 292); we possess scarabs of this king, and Potrie discovered at Coptos a fragment of a btelo bearing his name and titles, and describing the works which ho executed in the temples of the town (^History of Egypt, pp. 240, 247). The XIV"' year of ManhotpOri is mentioned in a passage of the story, as being the date of the death of a personage born under UotpilrJ (Maspeko, Lcs Contes popu- laires de l'£gypte ancienne, 2nd edit., p. 293). These two kings belong, as far as we are able to judge, to the middle of the XVII'" djniasty ; I am inclined to place beside them the Pharaoh Nftbhotpfiri, of wliom we possess a few rather coarse scarabs (Flinders Petkie, Historical Scarabs, pi. 26). * On the subject of these queens, see Maspkiio, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 258, 259, 270-276. 78 THE ETKSdS IN EGYPT. formally to invest the eldest of them with royal authority in the room of the deceased, and with him he shared the externals, if not the reality, of power.^ It is doubtful whether the third Saqnunri Tiuaa known to us — he who added an epithet to his name, and was commonly known as Tiuaqni, " Tiuaa the brave " ^—united in his person all the requisites of a Pharaoh qualified to reign in his own right. However this may have been, at all events his wife, Queen Ahhotpu, possessed them. His eldest son Ahmosu died prematurely; the two younger brothers, Kamosu and a second Ahmosu, the Amosis of the Greeks, assumed the crown after him. It is possible, as frequently happened, that their young sister Ahmasi- Nofritari entered the harem of both brothers consecutively. We cannot be sure that she was united to Kamosu, but at all events she became the wife of Ahmosis, and the rights which she possessed, together with those which her husband had inherited from their mother Ahhotpu, gave him a legal claim such as was seldom enjoyed by the Pharaohs of that period, so many of them being sovereigns merely de facto, while he was doubly king by right,* Tiuaqni, Kamosu, and Ahmosis quickly succeeded each other. Tiuaqni ' Thus we find Thatmosis I. formally enthroning his daughter Hatshopsitii, towards the close of his reign (E. de Eouge, Etudes des Monuments du Massif de Karnak, in the Mdanges d'Archeologie EgijlMenne et Assyrienne, vol. i. pp. 47, 48 ; Naville, The Temple of Beir-el-Bahari, pp. 15, 16). ^ It would seem that the epithet Qeni (= the brave, the robust) did not form an indispensable part of his name, any more than Ahmosi did of the names of members of the family of Ahmosis, the conqueror of the Sheiiherds (Maspebo, Les Momies royales de Beir-el-Bahari, in the Memoires de la Mission frangaise, vol. i. p. 622). It is to him that tlie Tiuaa cartouche refers, which is to be found on the statue mentioned by Daninos-Pasha, published by Bouriant {Notes de Voyage, § 6, in the Becueil de Travaux, vol. xi. p. 159), and on which we find Ahmosis, a princess of the same name, together with Queen Ahhotpil I. ' Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Flinders Petrie. ■* I have attempted to construct a genealogy of this family in Les Momies royales de Beir-el-Bahari (Me'moire de la Mission de Caire, vol. i. pp. 620-637). One part of it is certain : (1) the marriage of Ahhotpu I. with Tiuaa III. (Boueiakt, Notes de Voyage, § 6, in the Becueil de Travaux, vol. xi. p. 159), where a deceased elder son, named Ahmosis, is mentioned together with his mother Ahhotpu JT-, NOrRITAKI, FROM THE WOODEN STATUETTE IN THE TDEIN MUSEUM.' TJUAQNI AND KAMOSU. 79 very probably waged war against the Shepherds, and it is not known whether he fell upon the field of battle or was the victim of some plot ; the appearance of his mummy proves that he died a violent death when about forty years of age.^ Two or three men, whether assassins or soldiers, must have surrounded and despatched him before help was available. A blow from an axe must have severed part of his left cheek, exposed the teeth, fractured the jaw, and sent him senseless to the ground ; another blow must have seriously injured the skull, and a dagger orjavelin has cut open the forehead on the right side, a little above the eye. His body must have remained lying where it fell for some time : when found, decomposition had set in, and the embalming had to be hastily performed as best it might. The thk head of sAQxCNui m.- hair is thick, rough, and matted ; the face had been shaved on the morning of his death, but by touching the cheek we can ascertain how harsh and abundant the hair must have been. The mummy is that of a fine, vigorous man, who might have lived to a hundred years, and he must have defended himself resolutely against his assailants; his features bear even now an expression of fury. A flattened patch of exuded brain appears above one eye, the forehead is wrinkled, and the lips, which are drawn back in a circle about the gums, reveal the teeth still biting into the tongue. Kamosu did not reign long;^ we know nothing of the and bis sister Ahmosis, probably tbe future Queen Abmasi-Nofrltari. Tbo otber sous are not named on this monument, which is dedicated to the deceased by his father, his mother, and the sister who would have reigned witli hiiu had he lived ; (2) the parentage of Ahhotptt L and of Ahmosis (Stele of Edfa, published by U. Boukiant, PeliU MonumenU et I'etiti Texies, in the liecueil de Travaux, vol. ix. pp. 92, 93 ; cf. Maspeko, Leg Momies royales, pp. 625-628) ; (3) tiio fact that Xofritari was her husband's sister, both on the father's side, as is shown by the words "royal sister " on lier protocol between the titles " daughter " and " wife of a king " (Lig Momies royales, p. 535), aud aUo on the mother's side, as is proved by the place which she occupies by the side of Abhotpft on Daninos-Pasha's statue (BovRiAKT, Notes de Foyaje, § 6, in the Recueil de Travaux, vol. i. p. 159). The order in which KamosCi should be placed is not quite certain ; the probability is, however, tliat he ought to come between TiOaqni and Ahmosis, and tiiat he was a brother of tlie latter. ' All these details as to the king's appearance and the manner of his death are furnislied by thr mummy which is at present in the museum at Gizeh (Maspeiio, Les Momies royales de Deir-el-Bahari. in the M^moires de la Mission Franfaise, vol. i. pp. 526-529). The name Taaaten, which Wiedemaun assigns to this prince {JEgyplische Geschichte, p. 301), is merely a misspelling of the name Tiuaqui, duo to the engraver who executed the inscription on the cotliu (Masi-eiio, Les Momies royata. pp. 526, 527). The worship of Tia&qni was continued down to tlie XX"' dynasty (LEPSiUj, Dtukm., iii. 2 a, d). ' Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Emil Brugsch-Bey, taken in 1886. ' With regard to KamosCl, we possess, in addition to the miniature bark which was discovered on the sarcophagus of Queen Ahhotpfl, and which is now in the museum at Gizeh (Viuey, Notice det Principaux Monuments exposes au Miuie de Gizeli, pp. 213, 214, No. 955), a few scattered references to his worship existing on the monuments, on a stele at Gizeh (Lieblein, Dictionnaire des Noin» TEE HYKSOS IN EOTPT. -events of his life, but we owe to him one of the prettiest examples of the Egyptian goldsmith's art — the gold boat mounted on a carriage of wood and bronze, which was to convey his double on its journeys through Hades. This boat was afterwards appropriated by his mother Ahhotpu. Ahmosis^ must have been about twenty-five years of age when he ascended the throne; he -was of medium height, as his body when mummied measured only 5 feet 6 inches in length, but the development of the neck and chest indicates extraordi- nary strength. The head is small in proportion to the bust, the forehead low and narrow," the cheek-bones project, and the hair is thick and wavy. The face exactly resembles that of Tiuaqni, and the likeness alone would proclaim the affinity, even if we were ignorant of the close relationship which united these two Pharaohs.^ Ahmosis seems to have been a strong, active, warlike man ; he was successful in all the wars in which we know him to have been engaged, and he ousted the Shepherds from the last towns occupied "by them. It is possible that modern writers have exaggerated the credit due to Ahmosis for expelling the Hyksos. He found the task already half accomplished, and the warfare of his forefathers for at least a century must have prepared the way for his success ; if he appears to have played the most important role in the history of the deliverance, it is owing to our ignorance of the work of others, and he thus benefits by the oblivion into which their deeds have passed. Taking this into consideration, we must still admit that the Shepherds, even when driven into Avaris, were not adver- saries to be despised. Forced by the continual pressure of the Egyptian armies into this corner of the Delta, they were as a compact body the more able to make a protracted resistance against very superior forces. The impenetrable marshes of Menzaleh on the north, and the desert of the Ked Sea on the south, com- pletely covered both their wings ; the shifting network of the branches of the Nile, together with the artificial canals, protected them as by a series of moats in front, while Syria in their rear offered them inexhaustible resources for revictualling their troops, or levying recruits among tribes of kindred race. As long as they could hold their ground there, a re-invasion was always possible ; m^roglypMques, p. 750, No. 1922), on a table of offerings in the Marseilles Museum (E. de Saulcy, Etude sur la serie des rois inscrits a la Salle des Ancetres de Tlioutlimes 111., pp. 48, 96, 97), and in the list of princes -worshipped by the " servants of the Necropolis " (Lepsius, Denhm., iii. 2 a, d). His pyramid was at Drah-Abu'l-Neggah, beside those of Tittaa and Amenothes I. iAbhott Papyrug, 1. iii. 1. 12). > The name Ahmosu or Ahmosi is usually translated " Child of the Moon-god " (Brdgsch, GescJiichte JEgyptens, p. 254) ; the real meaning is, " the Moon-god has brought forth," " him " or "her" (referring to the person who bears tbe name) being understood (Maspero, in the Bevue Critique, 1880, Tol. i. p. 106). ^ Here again my description is taken from the present appearance of the mummy, which is now in the Gizeh Museum (Maspeeo, Les Momies royales de Deir-el-Baliari, in the M^moires de la Mission du Caire, vol. i. pp. 533-535). It is evident, from the inspection which I have made, that Ahmosis was about fifty years old at the time of his death, and, allowing him to have reigned twenty-five years, he must have been twenty-five or twenty-six when he came to the throne. A HMO SIS I. 81 one victory would bring them to Memphis, and the whole valley would again fall under their suzerainty. Ahmosis, by driving them from their last strong- hold, averted this danger. It is, therefore, not without reason that the official chroniclers of later times separated him from his ancestors and made him the head of a new dynasty. His predecessors had in reality been merely Pharaohs on sufferance, ruling in the south within the confines of their Theban principality, gaining in power, it is true, with every generation, but never able to attain to the suzerainty of the whole country. They were reckoned THE SMALL (iOLD VOTIVE BARQUE OF I'UAHAOII KAMUsC, IX THE gIzEU MUSEUM.' in the XVIP'' dynasty together with the Hyksos sovereigns of uncontested legitimacy, while their successors were chosen to constitute the XVIII"', comprising Pharaohs with full powers, tolerating no competitors, and uniting under their firm rule the two regions of which Egypt was composed — the possessions of Sit and the possessions of Horus.'^ The war of deliverance broke out on the accession of Ahmosis, and continued during the first five years of his reign.^ One of his lieutenants, the king's • Drawn by Faticher-Gudin, from a photograph by Emil Brugsch-Bey, taken in 1878. ' Manctho, or his abridgers, call the king who drove out the Sliephenls Amosis or Tethmosis (MijLLER-DiDOT, Fragmenta Ilistoricorum Grxcorinn, vol. ii. pp. 572-578). Lepsius thought he saw grounds for preferring the second reading, and identified this Tethmosis with Thfltnioai Manakhpirri, the Thatmosis III. of our lists ; Ahmosis could only have driven out the greater part of the nation. This theory, to which Navillc still adheres (Bubattis, pp. 2!l, 30), as also does Steindorff (Zur (?«- schichte der Hyhfos, pp. 7, 8), was disputed nearly fifty years ago by E. de Rouge' {Examen de I'ouvrage de M. le Chevalier de Bunseii, ii. pp. 3G-43) : nowadays we are obliged to admit that, subsequent to tlie V"' year of Ahmosis, there were no longer Shepherd-kings in Egypt, even though a part of the conquering race may have remained in the country in a state of slavery, as we shall soon have occasion to observe (cf. pp. 88, 89 of the present work). ' This is evident from a passage in the biography of Ahmosi-si-Abina (1. 14), where it is stated that, after the taking of Avaris, the king passed into Asia in the year VI. (cf. p. 88 of the present work). The first few lines of the Great Inscription of El-Kab (11. 5-15) teem to refer to four succes- sive campaigns, i.e. four years of warfare up to the taking of Avaris, and to a fifth year spent ia pursuing the Shepherds into Syria. G 82 THE EYKSOS IN EGYPT. namesake — Ahmosi-si-Abina — who belonged to the family of the lords of Nekhabit, has left us an account, in one of the inscriptions in his tomb, of the numerous exploits in which he took part side by side with his royal mastei-, and thus, thanks to this fortunate record of his vanity, we are not left in complete ignorance of the events which took place during this crucial struggle between the Asiatic settlers and their former subjects.^ Nekhabit had enjoyed considerable pros- perity in the earlier ages of Egyptian his- tory, marking as it did the extreme southern limit of the kingdom, and forming an out- post against the barbarous tribes of Nubia.^ As soon as the progress of conquest had pushed the frontier as far south as the first cataract, it declined ia importance, and the remembranceof its former greatness found an echo only in proverbial ex- pressions or ia titles used at the Pharaonic court.^ The nomes situated to the south of Thebes, unlike those of Middle Egypt, did not comprise any ex- tensive fertile or well-watered territory calculated to enrich its possessors or to afford sufficient support for a large population : they consisted of long strips of alluvial soil, shut in between the river and the mountain range, but above ' The inscriptions on the tomb of Ahmosi-si-Abina (Ahmosis, son of Abina) were cojiied by Chajifollion, Monuments de I'Egypte et de la Nuhie, vol. i. pp. 655-658 ; afterwards by Lepsius, Denkm., iii. 12 a-d, and by Eeinisch, ^gyptische Chrestomathie, vol. i. pi. 6. The principal inscription was hastily examined by Champollion, Lettres ^crites d'Egypte, 2nd edit., pp. 194, 195 (cf. Cham- POLLioN-FifiEAC, L'£gypte Ancienne, pp. 168, 300.); it was then made use of by E. deEouge, Examen de I'ouvrage de M. le Chevalier de Bunsen, ii. pp. 31-42, and particularly in the Mgmoire sur I'inscription dti tombeau d'Ahmes, the conclusions in which treatise were used by Brugsch, Histoire d'Egypte, pp. 80, 81, 86, 90. It has been translated in full by Bkugsch, Reiseherichte aus Mgypterm, pp. 217-220, and afterwards in Geschiclite Mgyptens, pp. 230-235; by Chabas, Les Pasteurs en igypte, pp. 19-22 ; by Lepage-Eenouf, in Eecordsof the Past, 1st series, vol. vi. pp. 5-19 ; and lastly, by Padre Cesare di Cara, Gli Hyksos o Re Pastori di Egitto, pp. 324-328. - Cf. Maspero, Bawn of Civilization, p. 74. ^ The vulture of Nekhabit is used to indicate the south, while the urseus of Buto denotes the extreme north ; the title Ea-Nekhnit, " Chief of Nekhnit," which is, hypothetically, supposed to refer to a judicial function (Brugsch, Bietionnaire hi^roglyphique. Supplement, pp. 391-398 ; Erman, Commentar zur Inschri/t des Una, in the Zeitschrift, p. 5; and Mgypten und JEgyptisches Lehen, p. 134), is none the less associated with the expression, " Nekhabit-Nekhnit," as an indication of the south, and, therefore, can be traced to the prehistoric epoch when Nekhabit was the primary designation of the south. THE PRINCIPALITY OF EL-KAB. 83 the level of the inundation, and consequently diflScult to irrigate. These nomes were cultivated, moreover, by a poor and sparse population. It needed a for- tuitous combination of circumstances to relieve them from their poverty-stricken condition — either a war, which would bring into pro- minence their strategic posi- tions; or the establishment of markets, such as those of Syene and Elephantine, where the commerce of neigh- bouring regions would natu- rally centre ; or the erection, as at Ombos or Edfil, of a temple which would periodi- cally attract a crowd of pil- grims.^ The principality of the Two Feathers comprised, besides Nekhabit,at least two such towns — Anit,^ on its northern boundary, and Nekhnit almost facing Nek- babit on the left bank of the river.^ These three towns Tin; WALLS UF UL-KAB SEEN KROU THE I'^M sometimes formed separate , estates for as many independent lords : ° even when united they constituted a fiefdom of but restricted area and of slender revenues, its chiefs ranking below those of the great feudal princes of Middle Egypt. The rulers of this fiefdom led an obscure existence during the whole period of the Memphite empire, and when at length Thebes gained the ascendancy, they rallied to the latter and acknowledged her suzerainty. One of them, Sovkiinakhiti, gained the favour •of Sovkhotpu III Sakhemuaztaiiiri, who granted him lands which made the ' In regard to the markets of Elephantine and Syene, and the profits derived from them by the local magnates, cf. Maspero, Dawn of Civilization, p. 424, et seq. ; the greatness of Edlfl and Ombos dates principally from the Greek era, when the Ptolemies rebuilt and enlarged tlie temples of these two cities. ' AnJt is one of the most frequently occurring names of Esneh (Bkugsoh, Dictionnaire K)II.\MM] the outer part had fallen into the enemy's hands.^ The times were troublous ; the open country was repeatedly wasted by war, and the peasantry had more than once to seek shelter behind the protecting ramparts of the town, leaving their lands to lie fallow. Famine constantly resulted from these disturbances, and it taxed all the powers of the ruling prince to provide at such times for his people. A chief of the Commissariat, Bebi by name, who lived about this period, gives us a lengthy account of the number of loaves, oxen, goats, and pigs, which he allowed to all the inhabitants both great and little, down even to the quantity of oil and incense, which he had taken care to store up for them : his prudence was always justified by the issue, for " during the many years in which the famine recurred, he distributed grain in the city to all those who hungered." * Babai, the first of the lords of El-Kab whose name has come down to us, was a captain in the service of Saqnunri Tiuaqni.* His sou Ahmosi, having approached the end of his career, cut a tomb for himself in the hill which overlooks the northern side of the town. He relates on the walls of his ' Drawn by Fauchcr-Gudiu, from ii photograph by Eruil Brugach-Bey, taken in 1882. 2 The description of the town of Nekhabit is borrowed from S.\int-Genis, Detcription des ruinei d'El-Kab ou EMhyia, in tlie Description de I'Egypte, 2ad edit., vol. i. pp. 311-356. ' Tomb No. 10, El-Kab (Champollion, Monuments de V Egyple et de la Nuhie, vol. i. pp. 273, 274, 659). The iuscriptiou has been copied and translated several times by Urugsch {Becueil de Monu- ments, vol. i. pi. Ixxii. 3 ; Geschicht-e yEgyplens, pp. 244-247 ; Thesaurus Inscriptionum JEgyptiacarum, pp. 1527, 1528), who thought it might refer to the seven years of famine described in Gen. xli., et seq. * Great Inscription of El-Kab, 1. 4. There are still some doubts as to the descent of this Ahmosi. Some authorities hold that Babai was the name of liis father and AbJna that of his grand- father (E. DE RouGK, Memoire sur Vinscription d'Alimes, pp. 125, 126); others think tiiat Bubai was his father and Abiiia his mother (Tylou-Griffith, Tlie Tomb of PaJteri at El-Kab, p. 7 ; Eisexlour, Axis einem Briefe an JD"" L. Stern, in tlie Zeilschri/t, 1885, p. 57); others, again, make out Babai and Abina to be variants of the same name, probably a Semitic one, borne by the father of Ahmosi (Bkugsch, Geschichte ^Jgyptens, p. 227, et seq. ; Kuall, ^gyptische Studien, i)p. 70, 71) ; the majority of modern Egyptologists (including myself) regard this last hypothesis as being the most probable one. 86 THE EYES OS IN EGYPT. sepulchre, for the benefit of posterity, the most praiseworthy actions of his long life. He had scarcely emerged from childhood when he was called upon to act for his father, and before his marriage he was appointed to the command of the barque The Calf. From thence he was promoted to the ship The North, and on account of his activity he was chosen to escort his namesake the king on foot, whenever he drove in his chariot. He repaired to his post at the moment when the decisive war against the Hyksos broke out.^ The traditioa current in the time of the Ptolemies reckoned the number of men under the command of King Ahmosis when he encamped before Avaris at 480,000. This immense multitude failed to bring matters to a successful issue, and the siege dragged on indefinitely. The king at length preferred to treat with the Shepherds, and gave them permission to retreat into Syria safe and sound, together with their wives, their children, and all their goods.^ This account, however, in no way agrees with the all too brief narration of events furnished by the inscription in the tomb. The army to which Egypt really owed its deliverance was not the undisciplined rabble of later tradition, but, on the con- trary, consisted of troops similar to those which subsequently invaded Syria, some 15,000 to 20,000 in number, fully equipped and ably officered, supported, more- over, by a fleet ready to transfer them across the canals and arms of the river in a vigorous condition and ready for the battle.^ As soon as this fleet arrived at the scene of hostilities, the engagement began. Ahmosi-si-Abina conducted the manoeuvres under the king's eye, and soon gave such evidence of his capacity, that he was transferred by royal favour to the Rising in Memphis — a vessel with a high freeboard. He was shortly afterwards appointed to a post in a division told off for duty on the river Zadiku, which ran under the walls of the enemy's fortress.* Two successive and vigorous attacks made in this quarter were barren of important results. Ahmosi-si-Abina succeeded in each of the attacks in killing an enemy, bringing back as trophies a hand of each of his victims, and his prowess, made known to the king by one of the heralds, twice procured for him " the gold of valour," probably in the form of collars, chains, or bracelets.^ ' Great Inscription of El-Kah, 11. 5-7. 2 Manetho, iu MuLLER-DiDOT, Fragmenta Historicorum Grxcorum, vol. ii. pp. 567, 568. ^ It may be pointed out that Ahmosi, son of Abina, was a sailor and a leader of sailors ; that he passed from one vessel to another, until he was at length appointed to the command of one of the most important ships in the royal fleet. Transport by water always played considerable part in the wars which were carried ou in Egyptian territory ; I have elsewhere drawn attention to campaigns conducted in this manner under the Heracleopolitan dynasties (Maspero, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 456-458), and we shall see that the Ethiopian conquerors adopted the same mode of transit in the course of their invasion of Egypt. * The name of this canal was first recognised by Brugsch (Beiseberichte aus JSgypien, p. 218), then misunderstood and translated " the water bearing the name of the water of Avaris " (Histoire d'Egypte, p. 81 ; cf. Chabas, Les Pasteurs en Egypte, p. 19). It is now read " Zadikd," and, with the Egyptian article, Pa-zadiku, or Pzadiku (Brugsch, Diet. G^ogr., p. 1006; C. di Cara, Gli Hyksos o Be Pastor i di Egitto, p. 325). The name is of Semitic origin, and is derived from the root meaning " to be just ; " we do not know to which of the watercourses traversing the east of the Delta jt ought to be applied. ' Inscription of El-Kah, 11. 4-10. The fact that the attacks from this side were not successful ia TEE TAKING OF AVARIS. 87 The assault having been repulsed in this quarter, the Egyptians made their way towards the south, and came into conflict with the enemy at the village of Taqimit.^ Here, again, the battle remained undecided, but Ahmosi-si-Abina had an adventure. He had taken a prisoner, and in bringing him back lost himself, fell into a muddy ditch, and, when he had freed himself from the dirt as well as he could, pursued his way by mistake for some time in the THE TOMBS OP THE PRINCES OK NEKHABJt, IN THE HILLSIDE ABOVE EL-KAB.- dii'ection of Avaris, He found out his error, however, before it was too late, came back to the camp safe and sound, and received once more some gold as a reward of his brave conduct.^ A second attack upon the town was crowned with complete success ; it was taken by storm, given over to pillage, and Ahmosi-si-Abina suc- ceeded in capturing one man and three women, who were afterwards, at the dis- tribution of the spoil, given to him as slaves.* The enemy evacuated in haste the last strongholds which they held in the east of the Delta, and took refuge in the Syrian provinces on the Egyptian frontier. Whether it was that they assumed here a menacing attitude, or whether Ahmosis hoped to deal them a proved by the sequel. If they had succeeded, as is usually supposed, the Egyptians would not have fallen back on another point further south in order to renew the struggle. ' The site of Taqiniit is unknown (Bruosch, Diclionnaire G^ographique, p. 841). Piehl questions the existence of this place (Notes de Philologie li'gyplienne, in the Proceedingt of the Society of Biblical Archeoology, 1892-93, vol. xv. pp. 256, 257). » Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Eniil Brugsch-Bey, taken in 1884. ' Inscription of El-Kab, 11. 10-12; tlie text is not very explicit, but I can see no other possible interpretation of it than that liere adopted (cf. a different explanation in Piehl, Notes de Fhilologie J^gyptienne, in the Proceedings, 1892-93, vol. xv. pp. 257, 258). * Inscription of El-Kab, 11. 12, 13. The prisoner who was given to Ahmosis after the victory, is probably Paamd, the Asiatic, mentioned in the list of his slaves which he had engraved on one of the walls of his tomb (Lepsius, Denhm., iii. 12, c, 1. 12). 88 THE ETKSOS IN EGYPT. crushing blow before they could find time to breathe, or to rally around them sufficient forces to renew the offensive, he made up his mind to cross the frontier, which he did in the 5th year of his reign.'^ It was the first time for centuries that a Pharaoh had trusted himself in Asia, and the same dread of the unknown which had restrained his ancestors of the XII"' dynasty, doubtless arrested Ahmosis also on the threshold of the continent. He did not penetrate further than the border provinces of Zahi, situated on the edge of the desert, and contented himself with pillaging the little town of Sharuhana.^ Ahmosi-si-Abina was again his com- panion, together with his cousin, Ahmosi-Pannekhabit, then at the beginning of his career, who brought away on this occasion two young girls for his household.^ The expedition having accomplished its purpose, the Egyptians returned home with their spoil, and did not revisit Asia for a long period. If the Hyksos generals had fostered in their minds the idea that they could recover their lost ground, and easily re-enter upon the possession of their African domain, this reverse must have cruelly disillusioned them. They must have been forced to acknowledge that their power was at an end, and to renounce all hope of returning to the country which had so summarily ejected them. The majority of their own people did not follow them into exile, but re- mained attached to the soil on which they lived, and the tribes which had suc- cessively settled down beside them — including the Beni-Israel themselves — no longer dreamed of a return to their fatherland. The condition of these people varied according to their locality. Those who had taken up a position in the plain of the Delta were subjected to actual slavery, Ahmosis destroyed the camp at Avaris, quartered his officers in the towns, and constructed forts at strategic points, or rebuilt the ancient citadels to resist the incursions of the Bedouin. The ' Cliampollion's copy is dated in the year V. {Monuments de V^Jgypte et de la Nubie, vol. i. p. 656, 1. 14, as also that of Lepsius, Denhm., iii. 12, d, 1. 14); Brugsch {Beiseberichten am Mgypten, p. 218, and GescMchte ^gypten, p. 282) has read "year VI." According to Piehl (Notes de Pliilologie iJgyptienne, in the Proceedings, 1892-93, vol. xv. p. 258), we ought to assume, not tliat Sharuhana was taken in the year V., but that the Egyptians besieged it for five years. 2 Sharuhana, which is mentioned again under Thutmosis III. (Lepsius, Denkm., iii. 31 6, 1. 12), is not the plain of Sharon, as Birch imagined (The Annals of Thotmes III., as derived from the Hiero- glypMcal Inscriptions, p. 38), but the Sharuhen of the Biblical texts, in the tribe of Simeon {Josli. xix. 6), as Brugsch recognised it to be (Geograpliische Inschriften, vol. ii. p. 32). It is probably identical with the modern Tell-esh-Sheriah, which lies north-west of Beersheba. ' Inscription of El-Kah, 11. 13-15 ; Inscription of the statue of Ahmosi Pannekhahit, face A, 11. 3, 4. Ahmosi Pannekhabit lay in tomb No. 2, at El-Kab (Champollion, Monuments de I'lJgtjpte et de la Nuhie, pi. cxlv. 4). His histery is briefly told on one of the walls (Epheem Poitevin, Notice sur Ahmes, dit Pensouvan, in the Revue Arch^ologique, 1st series, vol. xi. pp. 65-73; Lepsius, Denkm., iii. 43 a, 6), and on two sides of the pedestal of his statues. We have one of these, or rather two plates from the pedestal of one of them, in the Louvre (Peisse d'Avennes, Monuments l!gyptiens, pi. iv. 2, 3 ; Lepsius, Auswahl der wichtigsten Urkunden, pi. xiv. A, B ; cf. Biech, The Annals of Thoutmes III., as derived from the Hieroglyphical Inscriptions, pp. 33, 34; Chabas, Mgmoire sur Us Pasteurs,pp. 22, 23; Beugsch, GescMchte Mgyptens, pp. 235, 236 ; C. di Cara, Gli Eyksos, pp. 328-330) ; the other is in a good state of preservation, and belongs to Mr. Finlay (Maspebo, Notes sur quelques Points de Grammaire, ■ etc., § xliv., in the Zeitschrift, 1885, pp. 77, 78). The inscription is found in a mutilated condition on the wall of the tomb (Lepsius, fenAim., iii. 43), but the three monuments which have come down to us are sufficiently complementary to one another to enable us to restore nearly the whole of the original text. THE WARS OF AHMOSIS I. IN NUBIA. 89 vanquished people in the Delta, hemmed in as they were by a network of fortresses, were thus reduced to a rabble of serfs, to be taxed and subjected to the corvee without mercy. But further north, the fluctuating population which roamed between the Sebennytic and Pelusiac branches of the Nile were not exposed to such rough treatment. The marshes of the coast-line afforded them a safe retreat, in which they could take refuge at the first threat of exactions on the part of the royal emissaries. Secure within dense thickets, upon islands approached by interminable causeways, often covered with water, or by long tortuous canals concealed in the thick growth of reeds, they were able to defy with impunity the efforts of the most disciplined troops, and treason alone could put them at the mercy of their foes. Most of the Pharaohs felt that the advantages to be gained by conquering them would be outweighed by the diffi- culty of the enterprise ; all that could result from a campaign would be the destruction of one or two villages, the acquisition of a few hundred refractory captives, of some ill-favoured cattle, and a trophy of nets and worm-eaten boats. The kings, therefore, preferred to keep a close watch over these un- disciplined hordes, and as long as their depredations were kept within reason- able limits, they were left unmolested to their wild and precarious life. The Asiatic invasion had put a sudden stop to the advance of Egyptian rule in the vast plains of the Upper Nile. The Theban princes, to whom Nubia was directly subject, had been too completely engrossed in the wars against their hereditary enemy, to devote much time to the continuation of that work of colonization in the south which had been carried on so vigorously by their forefathers of the XII'" and XIIF" dynasties.^ The inhabitants of the Nile valley, as far as the second cataract, rendered them obedience, but without any change in the conditions and mode of their daily life, which appear to have remained unaltered for centuries. The temples of Usirtasen and Amenemhait were allowed to fall into decay one after another,- the towns waned in prosperity, and were unable to keep their buildings and monuments in repair ; the inundation continued to bring with it j)eriodically its fleet of boats, which the sailors of Kush had laden with timber, gum, elephants' tusks, and gold dust : from time to time a band of Bedouin from Uauait or Mazaiu would suddenly bear down upon some village and carry ofl' its spoils ; the nearest garrison would be called to its aid, or, on critical occasions, the king himself, at the head of his guards, would fall on the marauders and drive them back into the mountains. Ahmosis, being greeted on his return from Syria by the news of such an outbreak, thought it a favourable moment to impress ' In regard to Nubia, see what is said in Maspero, Dawn of Civilization, pp. 391-39S, 478, et seq., .532,533. = As will be seen later on, the temples of Semneh and Wudy-IIalfah were rebuilt under Thfltmosis HI. 90 THE BEGINNING OF THE XVIIP" DYNASTY, upon the nomadic tribes of Nubia the greatness of his conquest.^ On this occasion it was the people of Khonthanunofir, settled in the wadys east of the Nile, above Semneh, which required a lesson. The army which had just expelled the Hyksos was rapidly conveyed to the opposite borders of the country by the fleet, the two Ahmosi of Nekhabit occupying the highest posts. The Egyptians, as was customary, landed at the nearest point to the enemy's territory, and succeeded in killing a few of the rebels. Ahmosi- si-Abina brought back two prisoners and three hands, for which he was rewarded by a gift of two female Bedouin slaves, besides the " gold of valour." This victory in the south following on such decisive success in the north, filled the heart of the Pharaoh with pride, and the view taken of it by those who surrounded him is evident even in 'the brief sentences of the narra- tive. He is described as descending the river on the royal galley, elated in spirit and flushed by his triumph in Nubia, which had followed so closely on the deliverance of the Delta. But scarcely had he reached Thebes, when an unforeseen catastrophe turned his confidence into alarm, and compelled him to retrace his steps. It would appear that at the very moment when he was priding himself on the successful issue of his Ethiopian expedition, one of the sudden outbreaks, which frequently occurred in those regions, had cul- minated in a Sudanese invasion of Egypt. We are not told the name of the rebel leader, nor those of the tribes who took part in it. The Egyptian people, threatened in a moment of such apparent security by this inroad of barbarians, regarded them as a fresh incursion of the Hykso?, and applied to these southerners the opprobrious term of " Fever-stricken," already used to denote their Asiatic conquerors. The enemy descended the Nile, committing terrible atrocities, and polluting every sanctuary of the Theban gods which came within their reach. They had reached a spot called Tentoa,^ before they fell in with the Egyptian troops. Ahmosi-si-Abina again distinguished himself in the engagement. The vessel which he commanded, probably the Rising in Memphis, ran alongside the chief galliot of the Sudanese fleet, and took possession of it after a struggle, in which Ahmosi made two of the enemy's sailors prisoners with his own hand. The king generously rewarded those whose valour had thus turned the day in his favour, for the danger had appeared to him critical ; he allotted to every man on board the victorious ' Inscription of El-Kab, 11. 15-17. As to the position of the land of Konthanunolir, cf. what is said in Maspero, Dawn of Civilization, p. 490. * The name of this locality does not occur elsewhere ; it would seem to refer, not to a village, but rather to a canal, or the branch of a river, or a harbour somewhere along the Nile. I am unable to locate it definitely, but am inclined to think we ought to look for it, if not in Egypt itself, at any rate in that part of Nubia which is nearest to Egypt. M. Revillout, taking up a theory which had been abandoned by Chabas {M€moire sur les Pasteurs, pp. 45, 46), and recognising in this expedition an offensive incursion of the Shepherd?, suggests tliat Tantoa may be the modem Tantah in the Delta (JRevue Egyptologique, vol. vii. p. 82, n. 1). THE RESUMING OF BUILDING WORKS. 91 vessel five slaves, and five arura of land situated in his native province of each respectively.^ The invasion was not without its natural consequences to Egypt itself. A certain Titianu, who appears to have been at the head of a powerful faction, rose in rebellion at some place not named in the narrative, but in the rear of the army. The rapidity with which Ahmosis repulsed the Nubians, and turned upon his new enemy, completely baffled the latter's plans, and he and his followers were cut to pieces, but the danger had for the moment been serious,^ It was, if not the last expedition undertaken in this reign, at least the last commanded by the Pharaoh in person. By his activity and courage Ahmosis had well earned the right to pass the remainder of his days in peace. A revival of military greatness always entailed a renaissance in art, followed by an age of building activity. The claims of the gods upon the spoils of war must be satisfied before those of men, because the victory and the booty obtained through it were alike owing to the divine help given in battle. A tenth, there- fore, of the slaves, cattle, and precious metals was set apart for the service of the gods, and even fields, towns, and provinces were allotted to them, the produce of which was applied to enhance the importance of their cult or to repair and enlarge their temples. The main body of the building was strengthened, halls and pylons were added to the original plan, and the impulse once given to architectural work, the co-operation of other artificers soon followed. Sculptors and painters whose art had been at a standstill for generations during the centuries of Egypt's humiliation, and whose hands had lost their cunning for want of practice, were now once more in demand. They hadi probably never completely lost the technical knowledge of their caUing, and the ancient buildings furnished them with various types of models, which they had but to copy faithfully in order to revive their old traditions. A few years after this revival a new school sprang up, whose originality became daily more patent, and whose leaders soon showed themselves to be in no way inferior to ' Inscription of El- Kab,U. 17-21. » Inscription of El-Kab, 11. 21-23. The wording of tlio text is 60 much condensed that it is difBcult to be sure of its meaning. Modern scholars agree with Brugsch (Reiseberichte aui ^gypten, pp. 2\'J, 220, and Geschichte ,T-:gyptens, p. 233) that Titiinu is the name of a man, but several ^Egyptologists believe its bearer to have been chief of the Ethiopian tribes (Wiedemann, jEgyptiiche Geschichte, pp. 309, 310), while others think him to have been a rebellious Egyptian prince (Ebmax, JEgypten unit Mgyptisches Lehen, p. 152; Maspebo, Uisloire Ancienne des Peuples de VOrient,\t\\ edit., p. 170), or a king of the Shepherds (Revillout, Revue £'gyplologique, vol. vii. p. 82, note 1), or give up the task of identification in despair (Chabas, M^noire sur les Pasteurs en Egyple, p. 46). The tortuous wording of the text, and the expressions which occur in it, seem to indicate that the rebel was a prince of the royal blood, and even that the name ho bears was not his real one. Later on we shall find that, on a similar occasion, the official documents refer to a prince who took part in a plot against Ramses III. by the fictitious name of Pentauirit (Devebia, Le Papyrus judiciare de Turin, pp. CO-63, 155, 156) ; Titi&nu was probably a nickname of the same kind inserted in place of the real name. It seems that,, in cases of high treason, the criminal not only lost liis life, but his name was proscribed both in this world and in the next. 92 TEE BEGINNING OF THE XVIIP" DYNASTY. the masters of tlie older schools. Ahraosis could not be accused of ingratitude to the gods ; as soon as his wars allowed him the necessary leisure, he began his work of temple-building. The accession to power of the great Theban families had been of little advantage to Thebes itself. Its Pharaohs, on assuming the sovereignty of the whole valley, had not hesitated to abandon their native city, and had made Heracleopolis, the Fayum or even Memphis, their seat of government, only returning to Thebes in the time of the XIII"' dynasty, when the decadence of their power had set in. The honour of furnishing rulers for its country had often devolved on Thebes, but the city had reaped but little benefit from the fact ; ^ this time, however, the tide of fortune was to be turned. The other cities of Egypt had come to regard Thebes as their metropolis from the time when they had learned to rally round its princes to wage war against the Hyksos. It had been the last town to lay down arms at the time of the invasion, and the first to take them up again in the struggle for liberty. Thus the Egypt which vindicated her position among the nations of the world was not the Egypt of the Memphite dynasties. It was the great Egypt of the Amenemhaits and the Usirtasens, still further aggrandised by recent victories. Thebes was her natural capital, and its kings could not have chosen a more suitable position from whence to command effectually the whole empire. Situated at an equal distance from both frontiers, the Pharaoh residing there, on the outbreak of a war either in the north or south, had but half the length of the country to traverse in order to reach the scene of action. Ahmosis spared no pains to improve the city, but his resources did not allow of his embarking on any very extensive schemes ; he did not touch the temple of Amon, and if he undertook any buildings in its neighbourhood, they must have been minor edifices. He could, indeed, have had but little leisure to attempt much else, for it was not till the XXII™' year of his reign that he was able to set seriously to work.^ An opportunity then occurred to revive a practice long fallen into disuse under the foreign kings, and to set once more in motion an essential part of the machinery of Egyptian administration. The quarries of Turah, as is well known, enjoyed the privilege of furnishing the finest materials to the royal architects ; nowhere else could be found limestone of such whiteness, so easy to cut, or so calculated to lend itself to tlie carving of delicate inscriptions and bas-reliefs.^ The commoner veins had never ceased to be worked by private enterprise, ' Cf. what is said in regard to this neglect of Thebes in Maspero, Bawn of Civilization, jip. 464, 528. E. DE EouGE, Etude des Monuments du Massif de Earnah, in the Mdanges d'ArcMologie £gyptienne et Assyrienne, vol. i. p. 41. In the inscription of the year XXII., Ahmosis expressly states that he opened new chambers in the quarries of Tfirah for the works in connection with the Theban Amon, as well as for those of the temple of the Memphite Phtah (Lepsius, Denlcm., iii. 3 a, 11. 3, 4). ' Cf. what is said in regard to the Turah limestone in Maspeko, Bawn of Civilization, pp. 383, 384. THE BE OPENING OF THE QUAE MIES OF TOR AH. 95 gangs of quarrymen being always employed, as at the present day, in cutting small stone for building purposes, or in ruthlessly chipping it to pieces to burn for lime in the kilns of the neighbouring villages ; but the finest veins were always kept for State purposes. Contemporary chroniclers might have formed a very just estimate of national prosperity by the degree of activity shown in working these royal preserves ; when the amount of stone extracted was lessened, prosperity was on the wane, and might be pronounced to be at its lowest ebb when the noise of the quarryman's hammer finally ceased to be heard. Every dynasty whose resources were such as to justify their resumption of the work proudly recorded the fact on stelae which lined the approaches to the masons' yards. Ahmosis reopened the Tiirah quarry-chambers, and pro- cured for himself "good stone and white" for the temples of Amou at Thebes and of Phtah at Memphis. No monument has as yet been discovered to throw any light on the fate of Memphis subsequent to the time of the Amenemhaits. It must have suffered quite as much as any city of the Delta from the Shepherd invasion, and from the wars which preceded their expulsion, since it was situated on the highway of an invading army, and would offer an attraction for pillagers. By a curious turn of fortune it was the " Fankhui," or Asiatic prisoners, who were set to quarry the stone for the restoration of the monuments which their own forefathers had reduced to ruins.* The bas-reliefs sculptured on the stela) of Ahmosis show them iu full activity under the corvee ; we see here the stone block detached from the quarry being squared by the chisel, or transported on a sledge drawn by oxen.^ ' Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a sketch by Vyse-Perrino, Tlie Pyramids of Gizeh, vol. iii., plate facing p. 99 ; cf. Lepsius, Denkm., iii. 3 o. ' The Fanhhui are, properly speaking, all white prieoneis, without distinction of race. Their name is derived from the root f61ihu,fanhhu = to bind, press, carry oflf, steal, destroy (Masi'eho, Lt» Contea Populaires de VEgyple Ancienne, Ist edit., p. 126, note 2 ; Max Muller, Atien und Europu nach Altxgyplischen Denkmdlern, pp. 208-212); if it is sometimes used in the sense of rhoBuicians (BuuGSOH, Geschichte JEgyptem, pp. 242, 258, 6G3 ; Wiedemann, Jigyptisclie Geechichtt, p. 310), it is only in the Ptolemaic epoch, by assonance with the Greek tolvMts. Here the term "Funkhai" refers to the Shepherds and Asiatics made prisoners in the campaign of the year V. against Sharuhana. ' Champollion, Monuments de I'Egypte et de la Nubie, vol. ii. p. -188 ; Roseluni, Monumenli Storici, vol. i. pi. xv., and pp. 195, 196; Lei'sius, Denkm., iii. 3 a,b; Vyse-Periuno, The Pyramids of Oizeh, vol. iii. p. 94, et seq. ; of. Brugsoh, Das Mjyptische Troja, in the Zeitschri/t, 1867, p. 92. ^4 THE BEGINNING OF TEE XVIII'" DYNASTY. Ahmosis had several children by his various wives; six at least owned Nofritari for their mother and possessed near claims to the crown, but «he may have borne him others whose existence is unrecorded. The eldest appears to have been a son, Sipiri ; he received all the honours due to an hereditary prince, but died without having reigned,^ and his second brother, Amenhotpu — called by the Greeks Amenothes^ — took his place. Ahmosis was laid to rest in the chapel which he had prepared for himself in the cemetery of Drah-abu'l-Neggah, among the modest pyramids of the XI*'', XIII"', and XVII"^ dynasties.^ He was venerated as a god, and his cult was continued for six or eight centuries later, until the in- creasing insecurity of the Theban necropolis at last necessitated the removal of the kings from their funeral chambers.^ The coffin of Ahmosis was found to be still intact, though it was a poorly made one, shaped to the contours of the body, and smeared over with yellow ; it represents the king with the false beard depending from his chin, and his breast covered with a pectoral ornament, the features, hair, and accessories being picked out in blue. His name has been hastily inscribed in ink on the front of the winding-sheet, and when the lid was removed, garlands of faded pink iiowerswere still found about the neck, laid there as a last offering by the priests who placed the Pharaoh and his compeers in their secret burying-place.^ Amenothes I. had not attained his majority when his father " thus winged his way to heaven," leaving him as heir ^ As to Sipiri, cf. Birch, Mude sur le Papyrus Abbott, in the Bevue Arch€ologique, 1st series, vol. xvi. pp. 272, 273 ; Chabas, Melanges ^gtjptologiqes, 3rd series, vol. i. p. 69 ; Masfebo, Vne Enquete judiciaire ■a Thebes au tempi de la XX' dynastic, p. 80, and Leg Monies royales de Deir-el-Bahari, in the M^moires de la Mission Fran^aise, vol. i. pp. 630, 637 ; Wiedemann, The King Ahmes-Sa-pa-ar, in the Proceed- ings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, vol. viii., 1886, pp. 220-225. ' The form Amenophis, which is usually employed, is, properly speaking, the equivalent of the name Amenemaupitu, or Amenaupiti, which belongs to a king of the XXP' Tanite dynasty (Wiede- mann, Zur XXIdynastie Manetho' s, in the Zeitschrift, 1882, pp. 86-88); the true Greek transcription of the Ptolemaic epoch, corresponding to the pronunciation Amenhotpe, or Amenhopte, is Amenothes The last date known is that of the year XXII. at Tftrah ; cf. pp. 92, 93 of the present work. Manetho's lists give, in one place, twenty-five years and four months after the expulsion ; in another, twenty-six years in round numbers, as the total duration of his reign (MClleii-Didot, Fragmenla Ilittoricorum Grxcorum, vol. ii. p. 572, it seq.), which has every appearance of probability. ' Tliere is no direct evidence to prove that Ameuothes I. was a minor when he came to the throne ; still the presumptions in favour of tiiis hypothesis, afforded by the monuments, are so strong that many historians of ancient Egypt have accepted it (Brigsch, Uistoire d'l-Jgypte, p. 80, and Getchichte /Egyptens, pp. 2G0, 261; Wiedemann, JEgypiitche Getchichte, p. 313). Queen Nofritari is represented as reigning, side by side with her reigning son, on some few Theban tombs which can be attributed to their epoch (Ltrsius, Dtnkm., iii. 1, 4 e). * Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Emil Brugsch-Bey, taken in 1882. • Masi'ero, Les Momies royales de Deir-el-Bahari, in the Mimoiret dt la Miuion Franfaite, vol. i. p. 627, where the true condition of this Ahhotpu has been presented for the first time. ' The liigh position which she occupied is clearly shown by tlio inscriptions on the tomb of her steward Karasa, published by Bouriant, Fetitg Monuments, in the llecucil de Travaux, vol. ix. pp. 94, 95; then by Pieul, Varia, § Iviii., in the Zeittchrift, 1888, pp. 117, 118. " Her portrait is given above on p. 3 of the present work, in tlie form of an initial letter. For au 96 THE BEGINNING OF THE XVIIP" DYNASTY. jewels she had received in her lifetime from her husband and son. The majority of them are for feminine use ; a fan with a handle plated with gold, a mirror of gilt bronze with ebony handle, bracelets and ankle-rings, some of solid and some of hollow gold, edged with fine chains of plaited gold wire, others formed of beads of gold, lapis-lazuli, cornelian, and green felspar, many of them engraved with the cartouche of Ahmosis. Belonging also to Ahmosis we have a beautiful quiver, in which figures of the king and the gods stand out in high relief on a gold plaque, delicately chased with a graving tool ; the background is formed of small pieces of lapis and blue glass, cunningly cut to fit each other. One bracelet in particular, found on the queen's wrist, consisted of three parallel bands of solid gold set with turquoises, and having a vulture with extended wings on the front. The queen's hair was held in place by a gold circlet, scarcely as large as a bracelet ; a cartouche was affixed to the circlet, bearing the name of Ahmosis in blue paste, and flanked by small sphinxes, one on each side, as supporters. A thick flexible chain of gold was passed several times round her neck, and attached to it as a pendant was a beautiful scarab, partly of gold and partly of blue porcelain striped with gold. The breast ornament was completed by a necklace of several rows of twisted cords, from which depended antelopes pursued by tigers, sitting jackals, hawks, vultures, and the winged urseus, all attached to the winding-sheet by means of a small ring soldered on the back of each animal.^ The fastening of this necklace was formed of the heads of two gold hawks, the details of the heads being worked out in blue enamel. Both weapons and amulets account of its discovery, of. Dr. Maunier's letter, Deux Documents relatifs auxfouilles de Mariette, in the Eecueil de Travaux, vol. xii. pp. 216-218 ; and Deveria, (Euvres,\ol. i. p. 380, et seq. The objects have been described and reproduced by Birch, On Gold-jewelled Ornaments found at Thebes in 1859, in the Archseological Journal, vol. xx. p. 166, and Facsimiles of the Egyptian Belies discovered at Thebes in the Tomb of Queen Aah-hotep, 4to, 1863 ; Mariette, Notice des Principaux Monuments, 1864, pp. 218-227. ' Drawn by Boudier, from the photograph by M. de Mertens taken in the Berlin Museum. ^ This necklace has been reproduced on p. 3 of the present work, -where it serves as a frontispiece to the chapter. THE JEWELS OF QUEEN AEEOTPO. 97 were found among the jewels, including three gold flies suspended by a THE JEWELS AND WEAPONS OF. QCEEN AIlIlOTPf I. IN THE tiiZEH JII SEL JI.' thin chain, nine gold and silver axes, a lion's liead in gold of most minute ' Drawu by Faucher-Gudin, from a ijliotogrnph by Bt'cbard, in Mauiette, Allium yhoUigtapUiquc du Mw€e de lloidaq, pi. 3. The dagger is reproduced by itself on p. 204 of tlie |)rcsent volume, side by side with a Mycenaean dagger of similar form and ornamentation. H 98 THE BEGINNING OF TEE XVIIF" DYNASTY. workmanship,^ a sceptre of black wood plated with gold, daggers to defend the deceased from the dangers of the unseen world, boomerangs of hard wood, and the battle-axe of Ahmosis. Besides these, there were two boats, one of gold and one of silver, originally intended for the Pharaoh Kamosu — models of the skiff in which his mummy crossed the Nile to reach its last resting-place, and to sail in the wake of the gods on the western sea.^ Nofritari thus reigned conjointly with Amenothes, and even if we have no record of any act in which she was specially concerned, we know at least that her rule was a prosperous one, and that her memory was revered by her subjects. While the majority of queens were relegated after death to the crowd of shadowy ancestors to whom habitual sacrifice was offered, the worshippers not knowing even to which sex these royal personages belonged, the remembrance of Nofritari always remained distinct in their minds, and her cult spread till it might be said to have become a kind of popular religion. In this veneration Ahmosis was rarely associated with the queen, but Amenothes^ and several of her other children shared in it — her son Sipiri, for instance,* and her daughters Sitamon,'' Sitkamosi,^ and Maritamon ; Nofritari became, in fact, an actual goddess, taking her place beside Amon, Khonsu, and Maut,*^ the members of the Theban Triad, or standing alone as an object of worship for her devotees.'' She was identified with Isis, Hathor, and the mistresses of Hades, and adopted their attributes, even to the black or blue coloured skin of these funerary divinities.^^ Considerable endowments ' It is reproduced, as nearly as possible full size, as a tail-piece on p. 108 of the present volume. The drawing is by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Emil Brugsch-Bey. - See the drawing of the gold skiff and its carriage on p. 81 of the present volume. ^ A list of the monuments on which she is represented as being worshipped in conjunction with her son Amenothes I. has been very carefully compiled by Wiedemann, JSgyptische GescMcMe, pp. 313, 314. * Stele from Karnak in Maeiette, Monuments divers, pi. 89; stele at Turin in Champollion- FiGEAc, ligypte Aneienne, pi. 67, and Maspeeo, Bapport sur une Mission en Italie, in the Reoueil, vol, iii. p. 113; coffin of Biitehamon in Schiapakelli, II Lihro dei Funerali, pp. 17, 18; of. for these representations collectively, Maspero, Les Momics royales de Deir-el-Baliari, p. 630. * Sitamon is mentioned, with her mother, on the Karuak stele (Maeiette, Monuments divers, p. 89) and on the coffin of Butehamon (Schtaparelli, ibid., pp. 17, 18) ; for the position to be assigned to this princess, of. Maspero, Les Mamies royales, etc., p. 621. " Arcndale-Bonomi-Birch, Gallery of Antiquities selected from the Brit. Mus., pt. i. p. 75, pi. 30, fig. 142; and Prisse d'Avennes, Notice sur les Antiquity's Egyptiennes du Mus€e Britanniqne, pp. 16, 17 ; cf. Maspero, Les Mamies, etc., pp. 440-543, 623, 624. ' Coffin of Butehamon in Schiapakelli, II Lihro dei Funerali, pp. 17, 18; tomb of Qoni at Deir el-Medineh, in Wiedemann, Tombs of the XIX"' Dynasty at Der el-Medineh in the Proceedings of the Bibl. Archseol. Soc, 1886, vol. viii. p. 231. » She is worshipped with the Tlieban Triad by Hrihor, at Karnak, in the temple of Khonsu (Champollion, Monuments de VEgypte et de la Nubie, vol. ii. p. 227 ; Lepsics, Denhu., iii. 246 a). ^ Champollion, Monuments de VEgypte, etc., vol. ii. p. 52, where her sacred bark is represented, and Seti I. in adoration before her. Her statue in the Turin Museum represents her as having black skin (Champollion, Lettres a M.le due de Blacas, i. pp. 21, 22). She is also painted black standing before Amenothes (who is white) in the Deir el-Medineh tomb, now preserved in the Berlin Museum (Lepsius, Denhm., iii. 1 ; cf. Ermas, Ausfuhrliches Yerzeichniss der Mgyptischen Altertlmmer, 1894, pp. 149, 150, Nos, 2060, 2061), in that of NibnMrli (Champollion, Monuments, etc, vol. i. p. 525, and pi. clxx. 1), THE APOTHEOSIS OF NOFRITARI. 99 were given for maintaining worship at her tomb, and were administered by a special class of priests.^ Her mummy reposed among those of the princes of her family, in the hiding-place at Deir-el-Bahari : it was enclosed in an enormous THE TWO COFFINS OF AHHOTPU II. AND NOFBItARI STANDING IN THE VESTIBCI.F. OK THE OLD bOlaK MI SEUM.- wooden sarcophagus covered with linen and stucco, the lower part being shaped to the body, while the upper part representing the head and arms could be lifted off in one piece. The shoulders are covered with a network in relief, the meshos and ill that of iJnnofir, ut Sheikh Abd cl-(iArnah (Id., ilM., p. 524). He r faco is painted bhu' in the tomb of Ivasa (Wiedkmann, Tombs of the XIX"' Dyn. at Der d-MeiUmh, in tlie Proceedings of the Arch. Soc, 188G, vol. viii. p. 220). The reprcsoutntion.s of this qiieon with a black skin have caused her to be taken for a negrcss, the daughter of an Ethiopian Pharaoh (Uoski.lini, Monumenti Storici, vol. iii. I, p. 92; Auundale-Bonomi-Uihoh, Oallery of Antiquities, ii. p. 74; Bri o.scii, Hist, d'f^gypte, pp. 85, 80 ; Lepsius, Briefe aus ^gypten, p. 208 ; Wiedemann, JEgyptische Genchichte, p. 3(>9), or at any rate the daughter of a chief of some Nubian tribe (Ed. Meykk, Geschichte JEgyptens, p. 224, note 1); it was thought that Ahinosis must have married her to secure the help of the negro tribes in his wars, and that it was owing to this alliance that he succeeded in exindling the Hyksos. Later discoveries have not confirmed tiiese hypotheses. Nofrltari was most probably an Egyptian of unmixed race, as we have seen, and daughter of Ahliotpfl I. (si e p. 77 of this volume), and the black or blue colour of her skin is merely owing to her identification with the goddesses of the dead (Bri osch, Gesch. JEgyptens, pp. 259, 200 ; Lauth, Aus Jlujyptens Vorzeit, pp. 245, 240). ' The monuments connected with her priests, her cultus, an. 317) to believe that a small stele in the museum at Turin was found at Meroe, and proves the presence of Egyptian armies in that town. Gazzera does not say that the object in question was discovered at Meroe, but only that the wood out of which it is cut is wood from Meroe, " un pezzetto di legno duro di Meroe, tagliato in forma di stele." The date of " I'anno ventisei," attributed to this monument, is not in reality traced on it, but the Italian author, applying an erroneous hypothesis of ChampoUiou's, counted the spikes on the palm stems surrounding the stele ; as there are twenty -six on each side, he thought that the Egyptian draughtsman intended to notify in this manner the twenty-sixth year of the king's reign. ' Inscription of Ahmosi-si-Ahina, 1. 28, et seq. : cf. Lepsius, Deiikm., iii. 12 d. ; Chabas, Les Pasteurs en Egypte, pp. 21, 22, 23, 48, 49 ; Brdgsch, OescUchte ^gyptens, p. 268. That this expe- dition must be placed at the beginning of the king's reign, in his first year, is shown by two facts: (1) It precedes the Syrian campaign in the biography of the two Ahmosis of El-Kab; (2) the Syrian campaign must have ended in the second year of the reign, since Thfltmosis I., on the stele of Tombos which bears that date (Lepsius, DenJcm., iii. 5 a, 11. 13, 14), gives particulars of the course of the Euphrates, and records the submission of the countries watered by that river (E. DE EouGE, i^tude des Monuments du Massif de Karnak, in the Melanges dArchi'ologie iJgyptienne et Assyrienne, vol. i. p. 541). ^ It is impossible at present to draw tip a correct table of the native or foreign sovereigns who reigned over Egypt during the time of the Hyks6s. I have given (Maspero, Dawn of Civiliiation, TEE NEW GENERATION OF EGYPTIANS. 107 forego the delights of conquest. From that time forward there was perpetual warfare and pillaging expeditions from the plains of the Blue Nile to those of the Euphrates, so that scarcely a year passed without bringing to the city of Amon its tribute of victories and riches gained at the point of the sword. One day the news would be brought that the Amorites or the Kliati had taken the field, to be immediately followed by the announcement that their forces had been shattered against the valour of the Egyptian battalions. Another day, Pharaoh would re-enter the city with the flower of his generals and veterans ; the chiefs whom he had taken prisoners, sometimes with his own hand, would be conducted through the streets, and then led to die at the foot pp. 789, 790) the list of the kings of the XIII'" and XIV"' dynasties which are known to us from tlic Turin Papyrus. I here append tliat of the Pharaohs of the following dynasties, who arc mentioned cither in tiic fragments of Manetho or on the monuments : XV" DYNASTY. The Shepherds in the Delta. The Thebans in tlic Said. I. [ShalitJ, Salatis, SaitJis. I. AmOntimaios. II. ? Bnun. III. ? Al'AKHNAN, ApAKIINAS. IV. [Ai'Opi I.], Apophis, Aphobis. V. ? Staan, Iannas, Annas. VI. ? Asses, Asseth. XVI'" DYNASTY. The Shepherds over the whole of Egypt. SCsirnib! KhianI. Apopi 11. ACsiiiiii. XVII"' DYNASTY. The Shepherds in the Delta. The Thebans in the Said. I. Apopi III. AqnOnkL I. TiCaa I. SaqnCnrI I. 11. TiCaa II. SaqnOnbI II. AxisfhbagmOtuOsis 'i Tethmosis ? SAKHONTINIUIli SanakhtCb! ? HotpOb! ? ManhotfCri ? NCbhotpObi Tii^AQNi SaqnCnrI III. UAZKHopiiuii KamosC. NEBPEUTUii AIIMOSC I. The date of the invasion may be placed between 2300 and 2250 b.o. ; if we count GGl years for the three dynasties together, ns Erman proposes (Zur Chronologic der Hyksot, in the Zcilfchri/t, 1879, pp. 125-127), we find that the accession of Ahraosis would fall between 1G40 and 1590 (see p. 73, note 1, of the present volume). I should place it provisionally in the year ICOO, in order not to leave the position of the succeeding reigns uncertain ; I estimate the possible error at about half a century. 108 THE BEGINNING OF TEE XVIIP" DYNASTY. of the altars, while fantastic processions of richly clothed captives, beasts led by halters, and slaves bending under the weight of the spoil would stretch in an endless line behind him. Meanwhile the Timihu, roused by some unknown cause, would attack the outposts stationed on the frontier, or news would come that the Peoples of the Sea had landed on the western side of the Delta ; the Pharaoh had again to take the field, invariably with the same speedy and successful issue. The Libyans seemed to fare no better than the Syrians, and before long those who had survived the defeat would be paraded before the Theban citizens, previous to being sent to join the Asiatic prisoners in the mines or quarries; their blue eyes and fair hair showing from beneath strangely shaped helmets, while their white skins, tall stature, and tattooed bodies excited for a few hours the interest and mirth of the idle crowd. At another time, one of the customary raids into the land of Kvish would take place, consisting of a rapid march across the sands of the Ethiopian desert and a cruise along the coasts of Puanit. This would be followed by another triumphal procession, in which fresh elements of interest would appear, heralded by flourish of trumpets and roll of drums ; Pharaoh would re-enter the city borne on the shoulders of his officers, followed by negroes heavily chained, or coupled in such a way that it was impossible for them to move without grotesque contortions, while the acclamations of the multitude and the chanting of the priests would resound from all sides as the cortege passed through the city gates on its way to the temple of Amon. Egypt, roused as it were to warlike frenzy, liurled her armies across all her frontiers simultaneously, and her sudden appearance in the heart of Syria gave a new turn to human history. The isolation of the kingdoms of the ancient world was at an end ; the conflict of the nations was about to begin. SYRIA AT THE BEGINNING OF THE EGYPTIAN CONQUEST. NINEVEH AND THE FIRST CCSS^.AN KINGS — THE PEOPLES OF SYPIA, THEIR TOWNS, THEIR CIVILIZATION, THCTR RELIGION — PHdCNICIA. T/te (hjuastii of Urna-agga—The Cossmois: their couutrij, their gods, thtir coHgnest of Chaldaia — Tlie first sovereigns of Assyria, and the first Coascfoh L ings : Agnvikakrimr. The Egyptian names for Syria: Khar A, Zahi, LotanA, Ktfutin—The military highway from the Nile to the Euphrates: first section from Zalu to Oaza — The Canaanites: their fortresses, their agricultural character : the forest between Jaffa and Muu)tt Carmel, Megiddo — The three routes beyond Megiddo: Qodshu — Alasia, Naharaim, Carchcmish ; Mitauni and the cmiutries beyond the Euphrates. Disintegration of the Syrian, Canaaniie, Amorife, and Khdti populations; obliteration of types— Influence of Babylon on costumes, customs, and religion— Baalim and Astarte, plant- gods and stone-gods— Religion, human sacrifices, festivals ; sacred stones— Tombs and the fate of man after death — Pha-nician cosmogony. Phoenicia— Arad, Marathus, Simyra, Botrys—Byblos, its temple, its goddess, the myth of Adonis: Aphaka and the valley of the Nahr-IbraMm , the fcstirals of the death and resurrec- tion of Adonis —Berytus and its god El ; Sidou and Us subnrbs—Tiire : its foundation, its gods, its necropolis, its domain in the Lebanon. ( no ) Isolation of the Phoenicians mth regard to the other nations of Syria : their love of the sea and the causes which developed it — Legendary accounts of the beginning of their colonization — Their commercial proceedings, their hanks and factories; their ships — Cyprus, its wealth, its occupations — The Phoenician colonies in Asia Minor and the ^gean Sea: purple dye — The nations of the ^gea n. THE MOUERS VILLAGE OF ZERIN, IN GALILEE,' SEEN FROM THE SOUTH.' CHAPTER II. SYRIA AT THE BEGINNING OF THE EGYPTIAN CONQUEST. Nineveh and the first Cossasan kings — The peoples of Syria, their towns, their civilization, their religion— Phosnicia. rpiIE world beyond the Arabian desert presented to the eyes of the enterprising Pharaohs an active and bustling .scene. Babylonian civilization still maintained its hold there without a rival, but Babylonian rule had ceased to exercise any longer a direct control, having probably disappeared with the sovereigns who had introduced it. When Ammisatana died, about the year 2099, the line of Khammurabi became extinct, and a family from the Sea-lands came into power.^ This unexpected revolution of affairs did not by any means restore to the cities of Lower Chaldavi tiie supremo authority which they once possessed. Babylon had made such good use of its centuries of rule that it had gained , upon its rivals, and was not likely now to fall back into a secondary place. Henceforward, no matter what dynasty came into power, as soon as the fortune of war had placed it upon the throne, Babylon succeeded in adopting it, and at once made it its own. ' Drawn by Boudicr, from a photograph ; tho vignette, by Faucher-Gudin, represents an Asiatic draped with a blue and a red shawl ; cf. Chasipollion, MonumenU de I'^gypte et de la Nubie, pi. cclxvii. 2 ; Ro.'^ellini, MonumetUi Storici, pi. chii. ' The origin of this second dynasty and the reading of its name still aflTord matter for discussion. The name was provisionally written Shishku, Sisku, by Pinches, who was the first to discover it {Notes on a New List of Early Babylonian Kings, in the Proceediiign of the Bibl. Arch. Soc, 1880-81, vol. iii. pp. 21, 22) ; it was at once connected by Lauth {Remarks on the Name Shishku, ibid., 1880-81*, vol. iii. pp. 46-48) with the name Sheshach, which signifies Babylon in Jeremiah (ch. xxv. 26 and 112 STRIA AT THE BEGINNING OF THE EGYPTIAN CONQUEST. The new lord of the country, Ilumailu, having abandoned his patrimonial inheritance, came to reside near to Merodach.^ He was followed during the four next centuries by a dynasty of ten princes, in uninterrupted suc- cession. Their rule was introduced and maintained without serious oppo- sition. The small principalities of the south were theirs by right, and the only town which might have caused them any trouble — Assur — was de- pendent on them, being satisfied with the title of vicegerents for its princes, — Khallu, Irishum, Ismidagan and bis son Samsiramman I., Igurkapkapu and his son Samsiramman 11.^ As to the course of events beyond the Khabur, and any efforts llumailu's descendants may have made to establish their authority in the direction of the Mediterranean, we have no inscriptions to inform us, and must be content to remain in ignorance. The last two of these princes, Melamkurkurra and Eagamil, were not connected with each other, and had no direct relationship with their predecessors.^ The shortness of their li. 41). But Sheshacli is only an indirect way of writing Babel by athash, and Pinches had observed that the group might be read Shishazag, Uruazag, or Uruku, as well as Shishku : the reading Uruku even inclined H. Kawlinson to make XJruk-Erech the cradle of the Babylonian dynasty (Proceedings, 1880-81, vol. iii. pp. 48, 49). Eastlake endeavoured to prove by means of philology what excellent grounds there were for this comparison (JJruhu versus Shishku, ibid., 1881-82, vol. iv. pp. 36-40), which Tiele declares improbable (Bahjlonisch-Assyrische GescMchte, p. 104); while Hommel, after having inclined for a short time to the reading Uruazagga (Geschichte Bahyloniens und Assyriens, pp. 169, 352), now declares Uruku to be nearly certain (4 Supplementary Note to Gibil-Gamish, in the Proceedings, 1893-94, vol. xvi. pp. 13-15). Fr. Delitzsch accepts the reading Uruazagga and recognizes Babylon in it, but Winckler {GescMchte Bahyloniens und Assyriens, pp. 67, 68, 327, 328) believes it to be merely the name of a district of Babylon, where the dynasty may have originated. Finally, Hilprecht (Assyriaca, vol. i. pp. 25-28, 101-108) asserts, from Knudtzon's copy {Assyritche Geheie an den Sonnengott, vol. i. p. 60), that the second sign in the name is the syllable hha; and while recognizing the attractiveness of H. Kawlinson's and Hommel's hypothesis, declares himself unable to affirm anything concerning the value and the true signification of the group written Shish-Mia. Among these conflicting opinions, it behoves us to remember that Gulkishar, the only prince of this dynasty whose title we possess, calls himself King of the Country of the Sea, that is to say, of the marshy country at the mouth of the Euphrates (Hilpeecht, Bahyl. Exped. of University of Pennsylvania, vol. i. pi. 30, 11. 3, 6) : this simple fact directs us to seek the cradle of the family in those districts of Southern Chaldsea (Hilpeecht, J ssj/rzaca, vol. i. pp. 24-29). Sayce rejects this identification on philological and chronological grounds, and sees in Gulkishar, " King of the Sea-lands," a vassal Kalda prince {Academy, March 2, 1895). ' The name has been read An-ma-an or Anmau by Pinches {Notes on a Neiv List of Early Babylonian Kings, in Proc. Bib. Arch. Soc, 1880-81, vol. iii. pp. 43-45 ; cf. Hilpeecht, Assyriaca, vol. i. pp. 101-106), subsequently Ilumailu (in Fe. Delitzsch-Murdter, Gesch. Bab. und Assy r. ,2nd ed.. Table), Mailu (by WiNCKLEE, Gesch. Bah. und Assyr., p. 68), finally Anumailu and perhaps Humailu (by Hommel, Suppl. Note to Gibil-Gamish, in Proceedings, 1893-94, vol. xvi. p. 14). The true reading of it is still unknown. Hommel believed he had discovered in Hilprecht's book {Bah. Exp. of Univ. of Pennsylv., voL i. jjI. 15, No. 26) an inscription belonging to tlie reign of this prince ; but Hilprecht {Assyriaca, vol. i. pp. 101-106) has shown that it belonged to a king of Erech, An-a-an, anterior to the time of An-ma-an. ' Inscription of Irishum, son of Khallu, on a brick found at Kalah-Shergat, published in Eaw- LiNSON, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. i. pi. 6, No. 2 (cf. Winckler, Studien und Beitrdge zur Babylonisrh- Assyrisclien GescMchte, in the Zeitschrlft fiir Assyriologie, xo\. ii. pi. iii. 10; and Scurabee, ^Ifeste Assyrische Inschriften, in the Keilinschriftliche Bibliothelc, vol. i. pp. 2, 3, No. 3), and an inscription of Samsiramman II., son of Igurkapkapu, on another brick from the same place, in Eawlinson, Cun. Ins. W. As., vol. i. pi. 6, No. 1 (cf. Winckler, Stud, und Beit., pi. iii. 4 ; and Schradee, Mlteste Assyr. Inschrift., pp. 2, 3, No. 1). Samsirammau I. and his father Ismidagan are mentioned in the great inscription of Tiglath-pUeser II. (col. vii. 11. 60-69, col. viii. 11. 1-4, 47-49), as having lived 641 years before King Assurdan, who himself had preceded Tiglath-pileser by sixty years : they thus reigned between 1900 and 1800 years before our era, according to tradition, whose authenticity we have no other means of verifying. ' The name of the last is read Eugamil, for want of anything better : Oppert makes it Eagil {The TEE COSS^ANS AND THEIR COUNTRY. 113 reigns presents a striking contrast with the length of those preceding them, and probably indicates a period of war or revolution. When these princes disappeared, we know not how or why, about the year 1714 B.C., they were succeeded by a king of foreign extraction ; and one of the semi-barbarous race of Kashshu ascended the throne which had been occupied since the days of Kliammurabi by Chaldaeans of ancient stock.^ These Kashshu, who spring up suddenly out of obscurity, had from the earliest times inhabited the mountainous districts of Zagros, on the confines of Elymais and Media, where the Cossoeans of the classical historians flourished in the time of Alexander.^ It was a rugged and unattractive country, protected by nature and easy to defend, made up as it was of narrow tortuous valleys, of plains of moderate extent but of rare fertility, of mountain chains whose grim sides were covered with forests, and whose peaks were snow-crowned during half the year, and of rivers, or, more correctly speaking, torrents, for the rains and the melting of the snow rendered them impassable in spring and Sacred Field of the Goddess Nina, p. 9), simply transcribing the signs ; and Uilprecht (Astyriaca, vol. i. p. 102, note), who took up tlie question again after him, has no reading to propose. ' I give here tlie list of the kings of the second dynasty, from the documents discoTered by I'iNCUES, Notes on a New List of Early Babylonian Kings, in the Proceedings, 1880-81, vol. iiL pp. 22, 42, 43, and The Babylonian Kings of the Second Period, in tlie Proceedings, 1883-84, vol. vi. p. 195 ; cf. the corrections of Fa. Delitzscii, Assyrische Miscellen, in tlic Uerichte of the Saxony Academy of Science, 1893, vol. ii. p. 184, and of Knudtzon, Assyrisclie Gebete an den Sonnengott, vol. i. p. CO: Anman [Ilumailh] . . . 2082-2022 B.C. ; Kcbgalalamma, his son . . 1834-1780 b.c. KiANNiBi [iTTi-ii.u-NiBi] . 2022-1967 Adabakalama, his son. . . 1780-175G Damkillsiiu 19C7-1931 j Ekdrulanna 1750-1730 ISHKIBAL ....... 1931-1910 I Melamkubkdiii!A[Mi:lamma- Suusiisiii, his brother . . 1916-1889 ' tati] 1730-1723 GuLKisiiAit 1889-1834 EAaAMiL [Kaga] .... 1723-1714 No monument remains of any of these princes, and even the reading of their names is merely pro- visional : those placed between brackets represent Delitzsch's readings. A Gulkishar is mentioned in an inscription of Belnadinabal (Hii.rRECiiT, Tlie Babylonian Expedition of the University of Pennsyl- vania, vol. i. pi. 30, 11. 3, 6, and Assyriaca, vol. i. pp. 23-32); but Jensen is doubtful if tho Gulkishar mentioned in this place is identical with the one in tho lista (Gulkisehar—Muabbit- Kischschati—Konig von Babylon aus der Dynastic von Sis-azag und Gulkischar, Kiinig det Meerlaudci, in the Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie, vol. viii. pp. 220-224). ' The Kashshu are identified with tho Cossaeans by Sayco (The Languages of the Cuneiform In- scriptions of Elam and Media, in the Transactions of the Bibl. Arch. Soc., vol. iii. pp. 475, 476), by Sehrader (Keilinschriften und Geschichtsforschung, pp. 17(;, 271), by Fr. Delitzsch (If'o lag das Paradiesi pp. 31, 32, 124, 128, 129, and Die Sprache der Kosmer, pp. 1-4), by llaU'vy (Notes Assyriologiques, § 24, Les Coss^ens et leur Langue, in the Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie, vol. iv. pp. 208, 209), by Tiele (Babylonisch-Assyrisehe Gcschichte, pp. 02, 63, 67-71), by Hommel (Geschichte Babylo- niensnnd Assyriens, pp.275-278), and by Jensen(tf«/Ai«cAar — MuaUnt-Kischschnli—Konigvon Babyhm aus derDyiMstie von Sis-azag und Gulkischar, Kdnig des Meerlamh s, in the Zeitschrift fur Assyriolvgie, vol. viii. p. 222, note 1). Oppert maintains that they answer to tho Kissians of Herodotus (HI. xci.,' VII. Ixii.) and of Strabo (XV. iii., § 2, p. 728), that is to say, to the inhabitants of the district of which Susa is tlic capital (La Langue Cissimne on Cassite non Coss^e nne, in tho Zeit. fiir Assyriologie, yol. iii. pp. 421-423). Lehmann supports this opinion (SchaviaschchumuMn, KSnig von Babylonien, p. 63, n. 2, ami Noch einmal Kassu : KWior, nicht Koaaaios, Zeitschrift, vol. vii. pp. 328-334). Winckler gives none (Gesch. Jlahyl. und Assyr., pp. 78, 79), and several Assyriologists incline to that of Kiepert (Lehrhuch der Allen Giogr., p. 139), according to which the Kissians are identical with the Cossasans. ' Cf. the description of it given by Sennacherib in his second campaign (G. Smith, History of Sennacherib, pp. 43, 44, 11. 3-69), which can be completed by tliat given by E. RErLr.i, Nourelle G^ographie Vniverselle, vol. ix. pp. 167, 168, from the accounts of modem travellers. 114 SYRIA AT THE BEGINNING OF TEE EGYPTIAN CONQUEST. autumn. The entrance to this region was by two or three well-fortified passes : if an enemy were unwilling to incur the loss of time and men needed to carry these by main force, he had to make a detour by narrow goat-tracks, along which the assailants were obliged to advance in single file, as best they could, exposed to the assaults of a foe concealed among the rocks and trees. The tribes who were entrenched behind this natural rampart made frequent and unexpected raids upon the marshy meadows and fat pastures of Chaldaea : they dashed through the country, pillaging and burning all that came in their way, and then, quickly regaining their hiding-places, were able to place tlieir booty in safety before the frontier garrisons had re- covered from the first alarm.^ These tribes were governed by numerous chiefs acknowledging a single king — ianzi — whose will was supreme over nearly the whole country:^ some of them had a slight veneer of Chaldaean civilization, while among the rest almost every stage of barbarism might be found. The remains of their language show that it was remotely allied to the dialect of Susa, and contained many Semitic words.^ What is recorded of their religion reaches us merely at second hand, and the groundwork of it has doubtless been modified by the Babylonian scribes who have transmitted it to us.* They worshipped twelve great gods, of whom the chief — Kashshii, the lord of heaven — gave his name to the principal tribe, and possibly to the whole race : ^ Sliumalia, queen of the snowy heights, was enthroned beside ' It was thus in the time of Alexander and his successors (Polybius, V. xliv. 7 ; Diodorus SiCTJLUS, viii. Ill ; Steabo, XI. xiii.,§ 6, p. 524, and XVI. i., § 13, 18, pp. 742,744 ; Akrian, Anabcms, VII. XV. 1), and the information given by the classical historians about this period is equally applicable to earlier times, as we may conclude from the numerous passages from Assyrian inscrip- tions which have been collected by Pr. Delitzsch, Die Sprache der Kossxer, pp. 2, 3, 30-33. 2 Delitzsch conjectures that Ianzi, or lanzu, had become a kind of proper name, analogous to the term Pharaoh employed by the Egyptians (Id., ibid., pp. 25, 29-38). 3 A certain number of Cossaean words has been preserved and translated, some in one of the royal Babylonian lists (Rawlinson, Can. Ins. W. As., vol. ii. pi. 45, No. 2, verso; Pinches, Notes on a Nnv List of Early Babylonian Kings, in the Proceedings of the Bibl. Arch. Soc, 1880-81, vol. iii. pp. 38, 41), and some on a tablet in the British Museum, discovered and interpreted by Fr. Delitzsch (Die Sprache der Eossaser, pp. 23-29). Several Assyriologists think that they show a marked affinity with the idiom of the Susa inscriptions, and with that of the Achsemenian inscriptions of the second type (Sayce, The Languages of the Cuneiform Inscriptions of Elam and Media, in the Transactions of the Bibl. Arch. Soc, vol. iii. pp. 475, 476 ; Hommel, Geschichte Babyloniens und Assyriens, pp. 275-278) ; others deny the proposed connection (Delitzsch, Die Sprache der Kossxer, pp. 39-50), or suggest that the CosssBan language was a Semitic dialect, related to the Chaldseo-Assyrian (Oppert, La Langue des Elamites, in the Revue d' Assyriologie, vol. i. pp. 45-49 ; Halevt, Notes Assyriologiques, § 24. Les Coss^ens et leur Langue, in the Zeitschrift far Assyriologie, vol. iv. pp. 207-222 ; cf. Revue Critique, 1884, vol. i. pp. 482-486). Oppert, who was the first to point out the existence of this dialect, thirty years ago, believed it to be the Elamite (Expedition de MtTsopotamie, vol. i. p- 275) ; he still persists in his opinion, and has published several notes in defence of it, the principal of which is La Langue Cissiemie ou Cassite non Coss^enne (Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie, vol. iii. pp. 421-423; cf. vol. v. pp. 106, 107), besides his memorandum on the Langue des Elamites. * It has been studied by Fr. Delitzsch, Die Sprache der Kossxer, pp. 51-54, who insists on the influence which daily intercourse with the Chaldseans had on it after the conquest ; Hale'vy (Revue Critique, 1884, vol, i. pp. 482-484), in most of the names of the gods given as Cossoean, sees merely the names of ChaldsBan divinities slightly disguised in the writing. * The existence of Kashshu is proved by the name of Kashshunadinakhe (Fr. Delitzsch, Die Sprache der Kossxer, pp. 29, 51) ; Ashshur also bore a name identical with that of his worshippers. TEE GODS OF THE CO SS JEANS. 115 him/ and the divinities next in order were, as in the cities of the Euphrates, the Moon, the Sun (Sakh or Shuriash), the air or the tempest (Ubriash), and Khudkha.- Then followed the stellar deities or secondary incarnations of the sun, — Mirizir, who represented both Istar and Beltis;^ and Khala, answering to Gula.^ The Chaldasan Ninip corresponded both to Gidar and Maruttash, Eel to Kliarbe and Turgu, Merodach to Shipak, Nergal to Shugab."^ The Cossajan kings, already enriched by the spoils of their neighbours, and supported by a warlike youth, eager to enlist under their banner at the first call," must have been often tempted to quit their barren domains and to swoop down on the rich country which lay at their feet. We are ignorant of the course of events which, towards the close of the XVIII"' century li.C, led to their gaining possession of it. The Cossfcan king who seized on Bcibylon was named Gandish, and the few inscriptions we possess of his reign are cut with a clumsiness that betrays the barbarism of the conqueror. They cover the pivot stones on which Sargon of Agado or one of the Bursins had hung the doors of the temple of Nippur, but which Gandish dedicated afresh in order to win for himself, in the eyes of posterity, the credit of the work of these sovereigns.' Bel found favour in the ' Sl)e is mentioned in a rescript of Nebuclmdrezzar I., at the head of the gods of Naniar, that is to say, the Cossajan deities, as " the lady of the shiiiin