d^^.t-C. >'. /*£({(■ /?! (nvfatstC*^ furtu* r ( 7 €l-i >-/' 3'ti-' C t xa /COL<^ A.st >j ? CL J/ehGrr Q? A r? , v - w /j . cti * l&rS COLLECTION OF THE LATE W. H. STEWART CATALOGUE OF THE MODERN MASTERPIECES /W fjLh‘3 /[/eArviS VTL GATHERED BY THE LATE CONNOISSEUR William H. Stewart, TO BE DISPOSED OF AT ABSOLUTE PUBLIC SALE, BY ORDER OF HIS EXECUTORS On Thursday and Friday Evenings, February 3D and 4TH BEGINNING AT 8. I 5 O’CLOCK EACH EVENING AT CHICKERING HALL FIFTH AVENUE AND EIGHTEENTH STREET L-S'SlJo THE COLLECTION WILL BE ON EXHIBITION AT THE AMERICAN ART GALLERIES MADISON SQUARE SOUTH From January 25TH until date of sale, inclusive THE SALE WILL BE CONDUCTED BY THOMAS E. KIRBY NEW YORK THE AMERICAN ART ASSOCIATION, Managers 1898 COPYRIGHT, 1898, BY THE AMERICAN ART ASSOCIATION, NEW YORK [all rights reserved] COMPILED AND EDITED BY THOMAS E. KIRBY MONOGRAPHS BY WESLEY REID DAVIS CATALOGUE RAISONNE BY ARTHUR HOEBER CONDITIONS OF SALE 1. The highest Bidder to be the Buyer, and if any dispute arise between two or more Bidders, the Lot so in dispute shall be immediately put up again and re-sold. 2. The Purchasers to give their names and addresses, and to pay down a cash deposit, or the whole of the Purchase-money, if required, in default of which the Lot or Lots so purchased to be immediately put up again and re-sold. 3. The Lots to be taken away at the Buyer’s Expense and Risk upon the conclusion of the Sale, and the remainder of the Purchase-money to be absolutely paid, or otherwise settled for to the satisfaction of the Auctioneer and Managers, on or before delivery ; in default of which the undersigned will not hold them¬ selves responsible if the Lots be lost, stolen, damaged, or destroyed, but they will be left at the sole risk of the Purchaser. 4. The sale of any Article is not to be set aside on account of any error in the description, or imperfection. All articles are exposed for Public Exhibition one or more days, and are sold just as they are, without recourse. 5. To prevent inaccuracy in delivery and inconvenience in the settlement of the Purchases, no Lot can, on any account, be removed during the Sale. 6. Upon failure to comply with the above conditions, the money deposited in part payment shall be forfeited ; all Lots uncleared within twenty-four hours from conclusion of Sale shall be re-sold by public or private Sale, without further notice, and the deficiency (if any) attending such re-sale shall be made good by the defaulter at this Sale, together with all charges attending the same. This Con¬ dition is without prejudice to the right of the Auctioneer or Managers to enforce the contract made at this Sale, without such re-sale, if they think fit. THE AMERICAN ART ASSOCIATION, Managers. THOMAS E. KIRBY, Auctioneer. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2020 with funding from Getty Research Institute https://archive.org/details/catalogueofmoder00amer_1 ORDERS TO PURCHASE The undersigned will attend to orders to purchase at this sale Messrs. M. Knoedler & Co., 355 Fifth Avenue Hermann Schaus, 204 Fifth Avenue Messrs. Cottier & Co., 3 East Thirty-fourth Street Messrs. Boussod, Valadon & Co., 303 Fifth Avenue L. Crist Delmonico, 166 Fifth Avenue M. Durand-Ruel, 389 Fifth Avenue T. J. Blakeslee, 353 Fifth Avenue Messrs. Arthur Tooth & Sons, 299 Fifth Avenue Messrs. Ortgies & Co., 368 Filth Avenue S. P. Avery, Jr., 368 Fifth Avenue William Macbeth, 237 Fifth Avenue C. W. Kraushaar, 1257 Broadway Messrs. Ainslie Brothers, 58 Wall Street M. I. Montaignac, 9 Rue Caumartin, Paris , I A Few Notes on the Works of Fortuny Included in the Collection of the late W* H* Stewart In 1869, when Fortuny went to Paris, he took with him two half-completed works—“ La Vicaria ” and “ Le Choix du Modele.” “ La Vicaria,” which was the more advanced of the two, was finished first, and achieved so great a success that it was sold for a sum which no modern painting had ever brought, up to that time. Some years ago Mrs. Cornelius Vanderbilt sat to me for her portrait, and Mr. Vanderbilt requested me to try to obtain “ La Vicaria ” from the Marquise de Carcano (who was then and is still the owner of this masterpiece), and to offer for it 250,000 francs. The Marquise, being especially fond of the magnificent picture, did not wish to part with it, and would not accept my offer. Some time after this, M. Georges Petit tried to buy the picture, but with no better success, although he offered 500,000 francs. Mr. Stewart always regretted that he had not been able to secure this fine work, and it was he who commissioned Fortuny to paint “ Le Choix du Modele.” A few years later the master enriched the fine arts by this veritable gem. Although the picture was finished in Rome, part of it was painted in Paris. 1 remember one night at the Palais-Royal Theatre, where we were spending the evening, Fortuny, who was a keen observer, was particularly struck by the appearance of Lh<§ritier, the actor. Upon his return home he bestowed upon the figure in the canvas—that stands, with snuff-box in hand, in the group that is looking at the model—the features of the comedian who had attracted his attention. This picture met with the greatest success. When Couture went to see it he was amazed, and in a very interesting letter written to Mr. Stewart made it the subject of the highest praise. He expressed regret that Fortuny had not yet painted a picture which he had ordered from him. Another very remarkable canvas in the collection is a study of Meissonier. I cannot pass over in silence the following anecdote: For one of the figures in “La Vicaria” Fortuny needed a model who had the characteristic legs of a horseman. He was speaking of it to Meissonier, who said suddenly: “A horseman? Why . . . me!” Thus the great painter served Fortuny as a model, astonished and bewildered at the same time, at the rapidity with which he made the sketch. Upon his return from Poissy Fortuny confided to me that in order not to abuse the good nature of Meissonier he had not worked on the head as he would have liked to, but contented himself by completely finishing the legs ! Fortuny could not bear the sight of death. During a trip which we took together to Seville, 1 found it impossible to make him look at the ideally perfect head of a young Andalusian, whose body, following the custom of the country, was exposed in a glass coffin. And when M. Castillo lost his daughter, Fortuny gave the deepest proof of his affection to his friend by painting a portrait of the dead girl. Owing to reverses of fortune, this portrait found its way into the collection of Mr. Stewart. “ Fantasia Arabe,” also to be found in the collection, was the first picture pur¬ chased by this keen connoisseur. Then came “ L’Antiquaire,” to which Fortuny added some finishing touches after his trip to Paris in 1869. What was the surprise of Mr. Stewart, to perceive in the background of the picture a portrait of himself, that For¬ tuny had made from a photograph. It is said that whenever his friends asked why he did not have his portrait painted he would reply that he already had one, an admir¬ able likeness, painted by Fortuny. It was in London in 1871 that Mr. Stewart increased his collection by buying “ Le Dejeuner” and “ L’Arquebusier ”—two paintings, in payment of which he gave M. Goupil, in addition to a certain sum of money, a small portrait of Meissonier on horseback, painted by himself. The background of this picture was painted at Antibes. 1 was speaking one day to Mr. Stewart of a fine study of a negro’s head which Fortuny had in his studio in Rome, and upon his expressing a desire to own it, I wrote to Fortuny, who sent it immediately, begging Mr. Stewart to accept it as a token of his esteem. This head is the only one of the kind that the famous artist made in the same dimensions. After Fortuny’s death Mr. Stewart bought—with the idea that 1 would add several figures—the unfinished picture, “ L’Etang de l’Alhambra,” which remained in my studio for some time without my being able to decide what to add to it, finally coming to the conclusion that it was best to leave the work as it came from the hand of Fortuny. Great was the enthusiasm produced in Paris by these water colors, which revived and gave a new lease of life to this style of painting. It was then, having achieved success in this line, that Leloir, Vibert, Worms and others, formed the Society of French Water Colorists. My object here being only to mention a few incidents which I believe to be of some interest, I do not speak of the marvellous and original character of these water colors, the reputation of which is universally known. “ La Rue de Tanger ” is a water color which was presented by the artist to Mr. Stewart, who went all the way to Rome expressly to see him. “ Le Kief,” a water-color sketch of an Arabian scimeter, was painted under the following circumstances : Fortuny was in Madrid, on the eve of starting for Rome. An antiquary, anxious to possess one of the artist’s works, and knowing the way to tempt him, placed before his eyes a magnificent sword-hilt of the period of the Renais¬ sance. Fortuny, with wonderful rapidity, executed the water color, which he gave to the antiquary in exchange for the superb hilt which he coveted. “ Le Maure de Tanger ” was sold to Mr. Stewart by the well-known sculptor d’Epinay, who always regretted parting with this water color, as he was never able to procure another of equal importance by the master. Another magnificent picture, “ Le Carneval,” was painted in Madrid, and pre¬ sented to the director of the Opera-Comique in acknowledgment of a box which he had graciously placed at our disposal during our sojourn of six months in Spain. It passed from owner to owner, finally coming to augment the collection of Mr. Stewart. A beautiful water color, representing an old beggar of the Roman Campagna, was exhibited at Durand-Ruel’s, in Paris. Saintin, the artist, well known in New York, informed Mr. Stewart of the fact, and he bought it at once. To finish, 1 will add that at the sale of the works of Fortuny, which was held in Paris, I met a number of collectors and distinguished artists, such as Couture, Dumas, M. d’Errazu, etc.—all anxious to obtain a souvenir of the master. It was at this sale that Mr. Stewart bought “ La Cour des Cochons,” “ L’Alberca de 1 ’Alhambra,” “ Le Boucher Arabe,” and “ Un Paysage.” Neuville offered a sum much too large for an artist’s purse for a sketch, and was extremely disappointed when it was knocked down to a higher bidder. The eminent artist, Gerbme, made several bids for the “Musiciens Arabes,” a picture which he was very anxious to own; but he did not succeed; it remained in the possession of Mrs. Fortuny, who wished to keep it. Speaking to me of Fortuny, Gerome said among other things: “ How well he drew ! There was genius in his touch ! ” And he advised his pupils of the Ecole des Beaux-Arts to visit the posthumous exhibition of the great painter. Mr. Stewart was a connoisseur of extraordinary ability. He had naturally fine taste, but in addition he trained it to such a point that his judgment was almost infallible as regards work. As he knew the artists of the present time personally, he studied their methods. He discussed art with them. He knew their theories, and was thoroughly familiar with all the various modern schools. The result was natur¬ ally shown in the paintings he collected, for they include, in addition to the marvellous Fortunys, some of the most remarkable examples of modern art by famous French, Spanish, English, German and Italian painters. R. de MADRAZO. . ' MONOGRAPHS UPON ARTISTS REPRESENTED . MONOGRAPHS LAURENZ ALMA-TADEMA N a cloudless morning, the eighth of January, 1836, in a small village of Dutch Friesland, Alma-Tadema saw his mother’s face and the sun. His family name was of ancient renown and is to be found among the archives that tell of the Zuyder Zee. The prefix Alma he received from his godfather, and has always used it. The early years of his life were passed under conditions of frail health and strong antagonisms to his craving to be an artist. When physicians finally declared that he would never reach his majority on account of consumptive tendencies, he was permitted to fill the brief years allotted as he pleased. So soon as vent was given to aspiration, vigor returned and the disease was conquered. He studied in the Gym¬ nasium of Leeuwarden, and entered the Antwerp Academy in 1852. At an early date he acknowledged himself a pupil of Baron Henry Leys. His first passion was for the Merovingian barbarians, whose picturesque forms, massed against backgrounds of splendid tone, drew and held his heart. He advanced through the Nile valley, touched by all the dreaming memories of Egypt, to the land of Pallas, and later to the imperial city of the Tiber. In 1870 he fixed his residence in London. Although a quarter of a century has passed since he received letters of naturalization from his Queen, although England knows no more loyal son, he has really never ceased to be a citizen of Athens and Rome. From the start his sympathies were with the civilizations and peculiar traits of Latin and Hellenic races. The production that challenged wide interest and unlatched for him the gate to a triumphant career was “ Queen Clotilda, Wife of Clovis, First Christian King of France, Instructing her Children in Arms.” This painting was secured by the Antwerp Society for the Encouragement of Fine Arts, from whom it was purchased by the King of the Belgians. At the dispersion of his majesty’s collection it was brought to the United States. Here is shown that clearness of historical detail, that archaeological pre¬ cision, which made his after themes at once the delight and instruction of the world. Tadema holds the radical conviction that there is closest kinship between art and history. Modes of life, national customs, characteristics—in fine, all that enters into and colors the personality of a people belongs to the gift of the artist. His realism he took from the soil of Holland, where the very earth was won from the hungry sea. Carlyle has said that “for grown persons the only genuine romance is reality.” This reality is not the crude actual, but that actual trans¬ figured by the light of the higher truth and knowledge which are in the seeing mind. Tadema introduces us to life as life throbbed in breasts and flushed in faces two thousand years ago. He paints it contented to be human. The logic of his work is based upon worthy uses of noble bodies ; hence there is no disdain of the mortal, as though the immortal were fouled by its shrine of flesh. He is real and radiant in the values of his figure-work. Undraped parts are pure, quiver¬ ing to the tune of health. He is utterly free from any influence of the Romanticists of the early Italian schools, who, being shut up to legendary or religious subjects, often strain against fetters of dust and wrestle to liberate their saints from ill-conditioned, emaciated forms, that they might float into mystical hereafters. Upon the tower- front of a cathedral in northern Europe there is an ancient clock that sends out a different figure with each hour it strikes. At dawn St. Peter emerges with his warn¬ ing bird, at noon Sol appears bearing a golden' hammer, at eventide a nun in white and grey, ringing a silver bell. Should the spiders weave a veil over the dial-plate, or the striking mechanism fail through rust, the toilers on their way to and fro would still know the time of day, so long as the figures came out with regularity on the platform above and went in at their folding-doors. Imagine a dire conjunction of circumstances through which the records of Greek and Roman history were destroyed, a faithful recognition of those periods of the world’s march would be possible from the creations of Tadema’s brain ; so deeply has he been saturated with their atmosphere, so thoughtfully has he revealed their daily goings, so steadily has he sought, so surely has he found their very selves. We should still see Rome and Athens. We could be present at public games, attend the forum, worship in the temple, press through marts of trade, share vintage festivals, whir) in Pyrrhic dances, behold the pride of Phidias discoursing to his friends on the friezes of the Acropolis, enter the ateliers of artists, attend upon Agrippa giving audience to his clients, follow the “ Tarquinius Superbus” while he knocks off the heads of the tallest poppies in his garden, listen to the Praetorians proclaiming as Emperor the weak-souled Claudius, who, bleached with fear, hides behind his curtain. Finally we stand before Tadema’s latest revelation—“The Coliseum”—where “ The buzz of eager nations ran In murmur’d pity-or loud roar'd applause.” The renown of this artist is like the sceptre-sweep of his Queen ; for him it is ■day round the world. Decorations have flushed his breast, yet their weight and wealth have left him unhindered and severely simple in his aims. He remains his own sternest censor. He is swift with his brush, but conscientious care tarries long, not unfrequently effacing weeks of painstaking labor. Tadema, following the example of the great composers, who numbered their works in the order of their production, passed “Opus 300” some time since. This method gives to the connoisseur the chronological evolution of his genius, an intelli¬ gent series of mind-marks whereby to trace the glowing tread of this stanch Lover of Truth. SANTIAGO ARCOS SHARPER antithesis could scarcely be imagined than that which chances, in 1 v the order of this catalogue, to place together the names of Alma-Tadema and Santiago Arcos. The single subjects represented by each likewise form a vivid contrast. Tadema shows us a classic gentleman reading his Horace. Arcos puts on his canvas “A Sleeping Fool.” Each man has touched a characteristic note in the loyal fashion of handling his theme. Arcos was born in Santiago, Chili. He studied under Raymundo de Madrazo and Leon Bonnat. His first exhibition was in 1873, a painting of large dimen¬ sions, “ The Elopement of Chloris.” Subsequently he followed the seasons of the Salon, chiefly sending portraits. At Madrid he received a medal for his “Philip the Second of the Escurial.” This was sold to his majesty the King, Alphonse of Spain. It is now in an apartment of the royal palace. Special note should be made of his water color in the Stewart collection. Arcos had under way studies of a number of figures for “The Court of Henry III.”; among these a buffoon. The model who posed for such a person one day arrived in a complete state of inebriety. Having donned his costume, he fell asleep upon a table. At that moment Mr. Stewart entered the studio, because he was fond of following the work of the younger artists and liked to encourage them. With his usual good humor, seeing the sleeper, he exclaimed : “ He is perfect like this ; make a water color of him.” In effect the larger part of the figure was painted during the model’s slumber. PAUL BAUDRY HE name of this artist has large and luminous exploitation in the foyer of the 1 Grand Opera House of Paris, the walls of which he painted between the years 1866 and 1874. There was an enforced hiatus on account of the Franco-Prussian war. This series of compositions vividly recalls that period of Renaissance frescoes which made glorious the palaces of Venice. The boldness of the designs, the poise of their treatment, fraught with a harmony of coloration unsurpassed, turn these five hundred square meters into fields of immortal legend. The beginnings of such a man have a peculiar charm. His father, a peasant of sturdy life, early took him on long walks, which generated a love of nature. He never lost the clear-eyed vision born through these journeys. The pedantry of teachers, the mechanical methods of conventional schools could not cloud it. Wherever his touch falls there is the positive accent of form and the articulation of life. His portraits group easily with the finest of the modern school. He has succeeded in varying his backgrounds as no other artist. His faces are histories. The most notable are : “ Baron Jard de Panvillier,” “Count Foucher de Careil,” “ M. Guizot,” “ Mme. Bernstein and her Son,” “ Ambroise Bpudry,” “ M. About,” “Charles Gamier,” “Mme. Cezard, of Nantes,” “Mile. Deniere,” and “General Count Palikao ” in a landscape of battle. His “ Vision of St. Hubert,” to be seen on the chimney front of the grand salon in the Chateau of Chantilly, astonished the critics. Of this Charles Ephrussi says : “Some have determined to see in it a learned whimsicalness, others a challenge to sanctioned and necessary traditions of composition. They were accustomed to the everlasting patron of huntsmen piously kneeling before the miraculous cross. Here, in a wintry landscape lit up by sunlight without shadows, we find him under the features of the Duke de Chartres, like a primitive Capet, dressed in the Byzantine style, seen suddenly arrested, in all the ardor of desperate pursuit, before the white and lumi¬ nous stag, erect on the summit of the hills, raising its head to the sky. In an assembly of figures, animals, forest trees, and hunting implements of singular but scrupulous archaeology, a page, under the sympathetic features of the young Duke d’Orleans, holds a horse, whilst the pack of hounds are restless, not petrified by the miraculous apparition, but yelping and howling.” He sent to the Salon of 1883 three pictures that have since become permanent pleasures to the popular heart— “ La Verita,” “Eve,” “The Virgin, Jesus, and Saint John.” In the first exhibition of the Rue de Seze appeared “The Wave and the Pearl." A blue billow crested with foam has tossed upon the sand a nude figure of a beautiful maiden, who is lying on her side, with her back to the spectator, and turning her face with wondering eyes to look and smile at the world. This child of the sea, Hung from a wave’s bosom, lies on the sunny beach, in the midst of mosses and tinted shells, an incarnate, stainless joy. Baudry was born at La Roche-sur-Yon-Vendee, November 7, 1828 ; was the pupil at La Roche of Sartoris and in Paris of Drolling. He won the Grand Prix de Rome in 1850 by his “ Zenobia Discovered on the Banks of the Araxes.” Exhibited in Salon 1857. Medals : first class, 1857, 1861-1881 ; Legion of Honor, 1861 ; Officer, 1869 ; Commander, 1875 ; Member of Institute, 1870. His rank is not only among the lordly masters of the sixteenth century, in that golden age of decorative art, but is assured in the midst of those immortals who have made resplendent the closing years of the nineteenth. M. Paul Baudry died at Paris, January 17, 1886, from a stroke of apoplexy. JOSEPH LOUIS HIPPOLYTE BELLANGE B ORN in Paris February 16, 1800, and died there April 10, 1866. He was a pupil of Gros and the Ecole des Beaux Arts. He exhibited in every Salon from 1822 to 1866, and was decorated with medals: second class, in 1824 and 1855 ; Legion of Honor, 1834 ; Officer, 1861. He was Director of the Rouen Museum 1837 to 1854. His work took expression in genre and historical subjects. Horace Vernet was really his master, that great national painter who voiced with such dramatic clearness the common taste and mind of France as to be called “ the artist of the multitude.” Bellange marks a transition from unreal battle pieces to simple episodic painting ; a free camp life and valorous deeds are his special charm. He tells his story of events with graphic truth and directness. In the galleries at Versailles he is represented by the battles of Wagram, Loano, and Altenkirche (1837-39), with an incident from the retreat from Russia (1851). At the Leipsic Museum he has four pictures. His last and finest effort was “The Guard Dies, but does not Surrender.” The “Combat in the Streets of Magenta” and “The Cuirassiers at Waterloo” were approximations to Vernet’s best work. JOSE BENLLIURE HIS artist stands in the forefront of the Spanish colony at Rome, combining in 1 himself the gifts of sculptor and painter. These are so evenly poised that it is a problem to decide in which field he excels ; chisel and brush alike are wielded with equal success. He was born in Valencia in 1858. As a pupil of Domingo his talents matured early. He secured first honors in every competition, being gold medalist at Madrid, Dresden, and Berlin. He is one of the select circle pensioned by the Spanish government for residence in Italy, and has executed state orders for the decoration of public buildings. GIOVANNI BOLDINI AR 1 ANO FORTUNY, under date of February 20, 1874, writes from Italy to his friend Mons. W. H. Stewart in Paris: “Don’t fail to send me photo¬ graphs of something good, for at Rome we are in the dark. Here they see nothing, they know nothing. I would also much like to see something by Boldini. Judging from what little I have seen, he knows what he is about.” These two men were destined to develop a decided kinship in the character of the works produced by each, and many have deemed Boldini the only artist worthy to wear Fortuny’s mantle. He was born at Ferrara, Italy, 1845, the son of a painter of saints. From Ferrara he went to Florence, where he remained six years. His first productions revealed scientific insight and skilled technique. Since 1872 he has lived in Paris, a pronounced type, of whom Paris is proud. The Spanish dash and swing of motive may be seen in much of his work. He is a serene optimist, in love with the warmth and glow of life. After Paris the larger number of his patrons may be found in America, where he has received generous recognition. One who has known him closely and well, defines his artistic personality in these terms : “ A lover of sunlight and all the gayety and brilliancy of nature it involves, his first real successes were made with pictures in which he could give his taste in this direction fullest play. He possessed, in a rare degree, the faculty of feeling light as well as seeing it, and of painting it as he felt it, so that his sentiment might reach the spectator too. His painting of the figure, like that of the landscapes in which he was most fond of setting his groups up, was of an exquisite quality of color and ease of handling, and in the treatment of interiors his keen eye and accurate hand achieved equally felicitous results, always without the burdensome appearance of labor, from which mere superficial finish in art must suffer. No artist of his nation and century has, perhaps, come nearer to reviving in our day the essential elegance of art in France in the last century, when the broad path to the destruction of dynasties in a gulf of blood was made beautiful by the utmost refinement of genius with pen and brush.” As a painter of portraits, Boldini commands the noblest constituency. Among these that of Verdi is perhaps most eminently characteristic. On this work the art- writer Royal Cortissoz comments : “Drawn from the life in a few hours, it has'all of Boldini’s best qualities concentrated and intensified. Nervous, dispassionate, scorning idealization, and rendering with the keenest precision every trait revealed by the composer's physiog¬ nomy, it has the vividness of life with a distinction that only art can give to life. The style of the portrait, the technical brilliancy, the fire and force, are incomparable. There is no portrait painter living who could help envying Boldini the grasp and authority expressed in this work. It is a model of splendid workmanship splendidly applied.” l£on bonnat EON BONNAT was born at Bayonne, France, in 1833. When he was fourteen ' 4 years old he sought Federico de Madrazo and solicited the honor of being among his pupils. This master admonished him of the arduous way and multiplied defeats confronting a young artist. Bonnat responded : “So be it, but I want to be a painter.” He entered upon his career with ardor and patience. Not content with his conventional routine in the atelier, he commenced studies in the fields. One day he exhibited to Madrazo a picture he had painted secretly. The master was sur¬ prised and fascinated. Cordially embracing him, he said : “You, my boy, will make your way.” He was recalled from Madrid to Paris by a death in his family. In Paris he placed himself under the tuition of Leon Cogniet, who was wise enough to leave uncurbed his natural bent. In 1837 the citizens of Bayonne furnished funds for his residence in Rome, where he tarried four years. His first successes were with small Italian pictures of unusual charm. These preluded his religious themes, in which he has won wide renown. He commanded attention by his “ Adam and Eve Find¬ ing the Body of Abel,” which was bought for the gallery at Lille. In 1869 his “Assumption of the Virgin” gained universal praise, and determined his drift to themes of similar character. His years at Madrid had opened on his heart the dim spiritual majesty of the old cathedrals, where he was unconsciously trained for this vocation. It has been said that the Scriptures have found in him a naturalistic com¬ mentator. He has been reproached with realism because of the scientific precision of his methods. This charge is logically true and openly a commendation of his work. His “Jacob Wrestling with the Angel” and “Christ” are the output of the world’s longing to-day for truth, and lose nothing, but rather gain immeasurably, on account of taking such substance and form as the humanity of the present tense can grasp and hold. “In him,” says M. Gautier, “the historical painter differs totally from the genre painter. As the genre painter showed himself fine and delicate, in the same degree the historical painter shows himself vigorous and strong.” He has treated portraits with undisputed superiority, giving us a series of faces that must form a precious gallery for posterity. Here will be found such distinguished person¬ ages as “Thiers,” Salon of 1877 ; “The Count Montalivet,” Salon of 1878 ; “Victor Hugo,” Salon of 1879; “ M. Grevy,” Salon of 1880; “Leon Cogniet,” his second master, Salon of 1881 ; “ Puvis de Chavannes,” Salon of 1882 ; “Mr. Levi P. Morton,” Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States, Salon, 1883. Bergerat’s Critique upon his portrait of Victor Hugo says : “ I do not know how any other painter than Bonnat would have come off from the severe and powerful theme that the august visage of the greatest poet of modern times offers. Here are no seductive accessories, no bril¬ liant stuffs, nothing that could lighten the agony of an artist’s soul, face to face with tangible, visible genius. Bonnat was sufficiently strong to undertake such a task, but what a stake he played for ! for this time it was not before the public, but before immortality that he placed his easel. In art Bonnat is intrepid ; he accepted his work in its formidable simplicity. Victor Hugo in a black frock coat, seated in an arm¬ chair, looking steadily in front of him. Those who have had the not-to-be-forgotten honor of being admitted to the poet's intimacy well know that black, profound glance that shines inwardly. It is the look of him who sees beyond the present. How Leon Bonnat has seized it I do not know, but it will be an eternal glory to him. What eulogy can one address to the artist who has been able to remain a master before such a master ? ” His portrait by himself reproduces his bronzed virile face with the flaming glance that astonished Federico Madrazo and that sparkles brighter than ever under the shade of his arched eyebrows. His honors have had significant progression— second Grand Prix de Rome, 1838 ; medal of honor, 1869 ; medals : second class, 1861—’63, ’69 ; Legion of Honor, 1867 ; Officer, 1874 ; Commander, 1882 ; Member of Institute of France and Knight of the Order of Leopold. His portraitures of women and children are full of truthful sentiment and delicate observation. They are well within the realm of the beautiful without falling to the level of prettiness. Leon Bonnat stands for the conjunction between French modern painting and the old Spanish schools. He has poured the fresh blood of naturalism into the one, and a serene reserve, a chastened passion, into the other. RICHARD PARKES BONINGTON LTHOUGH English by parentage and birth, Richard Parkes Bonington is 1 v claimed by France. He was born in the village of Arnold, near Nottingham, on the 25th of October, 1801, and died in London September 23, 1828. His father was an artist of moderate equipment, doing reasonable things in portraiture and landscape. Having exhausted his resources in England, he took his family to Paris, where his son studied in the Louvre, and later under the guidance of Baron Gros. Eugene Delacroix, swift always to recognize young men of mark, gave him fellowship and unqualified praise. His water colors sold rapidly, showing- landscape and river views, especially exploiting the Seine and street scenes in the older sections of Paris. His figure-work was fine, and when introduced into his themes gave increased force. He won the gold medal of 1824, and shortly after visited Italy, where he executed elaborate Venetian studies. It was in the exhi¬ bition of these that his wider reputation was made. It was a sorrow to Bonington that England remained so long ignorant of her son-. Two years before his decease recognition came through the exhibition of two of his pictures in London, when he was favorably mentioned as “an unknown but promising artist.” It was some¬ what of a comfort that for ten years Parisians had literally contended for the privilege of purchasing from his easel. The seal of death was set on him by the hot sun while painting out-of-doors. He caught a fever which developed into hasty consumption. He sought medical skill and rest in England, but his splendid physique had been undermined, and he passed hence, in the home of a friend, after a confining illness of three weeks. Sir Thomas Lawrence, writing of Boning¬ ton’s demise, said : “I have never known in my own time an early death of talent so promising, so rapidly and obviously improving.” Bonington produced a number of lithographs, which are to-day greatly treasured by collectors. His painting, “ Francois et la Duchesse d'Etampes,” is in the Louvre. LfiON BONVIN S the poet in the realm of words is the real and complete artist ; as his metrical setting enables him to show a part as well as a whole, to make perfect the smallest thing, to give beauty and immortality to an emotion, an image, “ As when the dawn glows o’er the glowing deep, And sea and sky are but asunder as a two-leaved book All of one story,” which may not be expanded beyond the dozen lines of a sonnet—so Bonvin has, in contrast to the prosing artists of his time, caught the sonnet spirit for his themes. This is the more marvelous when we recall that he had no quiet retreat or chosen tower in which to open his note-book, but kept a wayside inn. He had only the chill hours of the morning or the weary ones of the night, when, for a brief space, he was free from the bitter railings of a wife (who faithfully misunderstood him), in which to make his studies and paint his water colors. He was born at Vaugirard, within the environs of Paris, on February 28, 1834. His father had been in turn a servant, a barber, a soldier, and a gendarme. His last avocation was that of a rural policeman, with the privilege of selling drink. The old man, it is said, though virtuous, was ferociously selfish. He would not allow his sons to be apprenticed to a trade, but kept them home to act as waiters. Leon, the youngest of four brothers, was buffeted from childhood. He was large-boned, of heavy build, awkward, and apparently clumsy-handed. Beneath this coarse vesture there were fibres as delicate as those of a sensitive child, nerve-lines that trembled in the breath of flowers, tuneful chords more easily touched than those of an /Eolian harp. He devoted himself to water colors. His brother Francois, who early ran away from home to become, in due time, a painter of pronounced power, saw in his rough chrysalis the folded wings, and sent him to the school in the Rue de l’Ecole de Medicine, founded in the eighteenth century by Bachelier. In 1861 he married, and was thereafter perpetually reminded of the harness he had put on. Through pictures painted by him we are familiar with the interior of his house, which had been built out of materials given him by contractors in part payment for his keep¬ ing of their accounts, on the day when they came to eat at his tavern and to settle with their factors. He had learned music from an old German who lived near by, and played with discriminating taste. Beethoven was his favorite ; Gluck often relieved his silence and sorrow. There was a room just above the bar, where he had placed a harmonium, bought after years of patient saving of small sums paid him as pourboires. His wife, an ignorant, scoffing creature, would suddenly rush up the stairs, tap him on the shoulder, and say : “ Leon, you are boring the people down below with your gloomy church music. Play them something gay.” He would respond by melodies which the street organs had brought into fashion, and thus lose the enchantment of his heart under the spell of the great tone masters. He was in the habit of painting early in the day, before customers arrived for their draught of white wine. At night he would work under the light of a lamp inclosed in a box, which flung a broad radiation upon the flowers which he had gathered. In a thoughtful review of his individuality as an artist another has said : “Those who have tried with sincerity to paint flowers in the open air have felt how difficult it is to combine accessories with them ; either their brilliancy must be subordinated to the landscape, or the landscape must be sacrified. Leon Bonvin has succeeded in accomplishing the alliance with a talent all the more sure because it is simple and without artifice. Here we have a family of goldfinches that have alighted on the dry branches of some thistles and wild aniseed ; the vermilion of their beaks, the black of their cowls, the chrome of their wings, animate with sparks of brightness the opal gray of the fog through which the sun is penetrating. There we have a chrysanthemum which has grown up vigorously on a heap of rubbish, and glories in its starry flowers with their sulphur-yellow centres, while in the successive planes of the morning mist one sees a man digging, the profiles of the edge of a village and of the church steeples. (See the aquarelle entitled ‘The Market-Garden.’) Here, again, is a fuller's thistle with its silhouette of threatening prickles, .some wild carrots, and grasses shooting up in tender tubes ; their outlines strike across a sky of light, drifting vapors ; the light of the horizon is broken by the glacis of the fort of Issy, and by the outstretched arms of a windmill. Another water color is an evening effect of boundless melancholy. We might believe ourselves in a cemetery assisting at some tragic and distant conflagration which is flinging its sad smoke in the air. Through the knolled branches, which are losing their leaves, a woman is seen pass¬ ing, bent beneath a burden, and hastening toward a cold-looking and cheerless dwelling-house.” These four water colors belong to the collection of the late Mr. W. T. Walters, of Baltimore, who bought them of the artist. Mr. Walters possessed more than fifty examples of Bonvin’s genius. Twenty are landscapes combined with flowers, ten are landscapes alone, fifteen are subjects of flowers, and ten are studies of fruit. He could image an apple bough in blossom so freshly that its perfume would seem to fill the nostrils. Bonvin had no interest for plants that were prisoners ; hothouse growths were without a voice to him. When asked by Mr. Walters whether he had not a desire to paint cultivated flowers he answered : “Do not ask me to do these ; my heart is not in them.” A half-witted daisy by the roadside lifted a friendly face to his own, while the grasses and gorse of the fields were for him the motives and messengers of Heaven's kindness to earth. It was pitiful beyond words that this rare-natured man was left to fight in solitude his hard battle with misery and want. Friends have since read in his work premonitions of the hopeless struggle and blind despair. “ I have seen in the collection of Mr. Lucas,” writes one, “a picture which answers to the impressions of his aching soul : beyond a foreground of buttercups, wild roses, and brambles stretch a landscape darkened by the approach of a storm ; some fields, where a few stunted trees are growing ; a pool of water, in which is reflected a bit of dim blue sky ; some hills quite near, that give one the sensation of a closed life. Generally, and even nearly always, the signature of Leon Bonvin is traced neatly in black ; in this case it is written in somber red. This signature is followed by the date, 1865. “The winter of 1865 was terrible for Leon Bonvin. Other taverns had been opened in the neighborhood as the new houses advanced over the plain. The work¬ men had perhaps felt embarrassed at coming into contact with artists and bourgeois, and they no longer came. Leon Bonvin, having nothing to do at home, had even worked as a carter with the stone wagons. Debts were accumulating. He had a bill of thirteen hundred francs to meet. He was tortured by jealousy. His heart and his hands were torn by every thorn. “ On January 29, 1866, he went to return some ancient glass which had been obligingly lent to him ; thence to see a dealer in water colors, who did not deign to choose anything out of his portfolio. He found all the water colors * too dark, not gay enough.’ “A week afterward M. Francois Bonvin addressed the following letter to M. Albert de la Fizeliere, who, a few weeks before, had called attention to the misery of the artist. “ ‘ My Dear Sir: Here is a very sad conclusion for your article in the Evinement of the 13th November last. My poor brother, in spite of all his efforts, has been overcome by evil fortune. The attempts which he made a week ago to sell the last drawings he had executed were vain. The picture-dealer - offered him ten francs for drawings for which the others ordinarily paid him sixty francs. “ ‘The future seemed to him more gloomy than the past. Instead of confiding to me the full extent of his needs, he determined to have done with everything, and he went and hung himself on a tree in the wood of Meudon on the evening of January 31. You knew him, and you know that fraternity does not blind me when I proclaim that he was indeed the best and purest of the best. As an artist, one has only to look at his drawings to recognize his worth. His musical aptitudes were unknown. “ ‘ All this is dead ! “ ‘Now there remain three children and a weakly wife, and I myself, who am almost in as great misery, for at the present moment all the fruit that 1 have gathered of my labors is to have but few debts relatively to what I should have had if I had allowed myself all the necessaries of life. We need, then, dear sir, your kind aid to endeavor to organize a sale. For my part, 1 have never failed to respond to the appeals that have been made to me by others in similar circumstances, and I hope 1 shall find amongst our colleagues enough sympathy to help me in the sad mission which has fallen to my lot. F. Bonvin. i ( t “ ' 6th of January, i 860 . « “ ‘P.S.—His body was not found until Saturday, at Meudon, at the foot of a tree, near the pond of Villebois. The branch had broken. This is the only damage he ever did in his life. He was just thirty-two years of age.’” A broken branch in a forest, unconsciously broken ; the only damage he ever did in his life. The Church buried him in unconsecrated ground, forgetting that from a child he had read the gospels of God’s blossoms, and had pondered the hour-book of Nature as a breviary for meditation and prayer. Could birds and flowers have held convocation over the cold clay, they might have said : “ Let us put him beneath a coverlid of moss in the stillest spot of Meudon wood, and tell the frail violets he loved to grow there always for his memory.” “CHAM” (Nom de plume) HE Count Amedee Charles Henri de Noe was born January 20, 1819, on a -*■ small island near Mirande, whence the name of the family is derived, whose nobility dates from the ^Carlovingian kings. He studied under Paul Delaroche, Charlet, and Launy. As Ham was the second son and scapegrace of Noah, so “Cham,” or Ham, was the second son and scapegrace of Jude Amedee Compte de Noe, a peer of France. His mother was an English lady. He was a great wit, and the political caricaturist of Charivari (the French Punch). The count was one of the founders of the Republic in 187s. The blending of two strains of blood in his veins combined the most striking characteristics of the two nations. His satiric force was sweeping and yet concise. Paris afforded rich soil and hot incongruities for his ranging pencil. The downfall of the Empire, the incoming of the Republic, with its communistic tendencies, brought about the very complications in which the caricaturist delights. “ Cham ” was the largest figure in his day in the school of satire, and was openly recognized as the successor to Gavarni, than which higher praise cannot be spoken. He died in the year 1879. Only a few of his productions bear the family name; they generally show his pseudonym, “Cham.” * PAUL JEAN CLAYS \ r T''HIS distinguished Belgian was born at Bruges, 1819. He was the pupil of Gudin, in Paris, devoting himself to genre marine subjects, breaking the tradi¬ tions of the average artist, who spasmodically surges over his canvas with great storms. Clays was Wordsworthian in his work, revealing the waters asleep or stirred by the tide's pulses. His studies on the birth of waves under the caress of the breeze; the uneasy shivers that have a menace of the winds in them ; the clearness of rivers widening to the sea ; the snapping reflections of the sun’s rays crossing the faint crests that shimmer on the bosom of the Scheldt ; the cool tones and humid greys of the skies of western Flanders ; these are the motifs that allure his hand. He settled at Brussels, where, in 1851, he received the gold medal. At the Salon of 1877 he exhibited “The Zuyder Zee” and “A Canal in Zealand.” His later works show travel beyond the girdle of his moist horizons—views on the Thames and of the North Sea. In these he still held to his mood of serenity. “The magical charm of morning, the golden brilliancy of the evening twilight, the infinite variety of tones which light produces on waves, became the ideal of the sea painters after Clays.” Like him, they scarcely left the shore, or, at least, when taking the track of the high seas, kept a blue line of hills on the horizon. JOSEPH THEODORE COOSEMANS \X/E recognize in the name of this artist one of the most interesting landscape ’ ’ painters of Europe. His studio is in Brussels, where he has been honored with the Order of Leopold. Among his impressive works may be numbered “Entrance to Gorge aux loups in Fontainebleau Forest” (Exposition Universelle, Amsterdam, 1883), “Road in Heath of Geuck Plateau Belle Croix at Fontainebleau” (Munich Exhibition, 1883), “Autumn Landscape” (Jubilee Exhibition, Berlin, 1886). He has by sheer force of perception and exactness of knowledge put before us examples of strong feeling. The two landscapes in this collection indicate that he went straight to nature. Few winter scenes run so perfectly the entire gamut of cold notes and with such simplicity of expression. JEAN BAPTISTE CAMILLE COROT r T''HIS distinguished landscape painter was born in Paris, July 20, 1796 ; he died *■ there February 23, 1875. He was the pupil of Michallon and of Victor Bertin. These taught him little. He says that, having passed two winters with Bertin when he arrived in Rome, he was the merest tyro at sketching. “Two men stopped to converse ; I began to sketch them, beginning on one part—the head, for example. They would separate, leaving me with a couple of pieces of their heads on my paper. I saw some children on the steps of a church ; no sooner did I begin to sketch than their mother called them. 1 saw that in this way my portfolio would be filled with ends of noses, foreheads, and locks of hair. I resolved not to return, when I went out to sketch, without having something in its entirety. 1 attempted, there¬ fore, to sketch, in the twinkling of an eye, the first group that presented itself : if the figures remained in position for a time, I had at least the character—the general out¬ line ; if they remained long, 1 added details. I practiced in this way until I was able to fix the outlines of a ballet at the opera, with a few strokes made with lightning- like celerity.” This habit came to the front when he wrestled breast to breast with Nature, applying himself not so much to the form and line as to the life. In the clear-eyed, sympathetic study which M. Albert Wolff has given to his work, we find these words: “The controlling principle in this great artist is never to strike the Philistine by panoramic magnitude, but to establish in his art the vibration which is in Nature, to take by surprise its perpetual life, to send the air circulating through space, to shake the foliage in the breeze. He wishes to disengage and carry to his canvas the poet’s impression of the object. This poetry, he rightly deems, is not only in the composition—the composition is to him of small account— it is in the truth, for nothing is of such finished poetry as truth itself. Whether it be the old bridge of Mantes, glimpsed through the tall trees which reflect them¬ selves in the sunny waters, or Garda Lake, stretching out of sight into the light of dawn, with the leafage of the trees upon its brink trembling in the wind—it is always the country feeling which this artist applies to his canvas, whatever the aspect. Corot is the excelling interpreter of the serenity of Nature. “We need not be surprised that a style, springing, as it may be said, all fresh from the nerves of a primitive artist who sought the support of no predecessor, was so long a subject of debate. The public had been so habituated to see filing before its eyes a succession of rigid landscapes that it was naturally troubled before the vibrating themes of Corot. Those who recommence eternally the official teaching of the schools rejected him desperately. And he, the quiet, inspired man, heard little of the clamor in the solitude of his woods, on the banks of the pool, where he opened his soul to the enchantment of creation.” Corot has opened to us the strong tenderness of Nature’s heart. He remem¬ bered that from of old the pillars of Hiram were crowned with lilies; that the mountain wall must carry its frieze of mosses, the forest its fringe of ferns. He has the mood of Hellenic calm, and is a Greek in the joyous accord which he feels with the rhythmic pulse of the universe. He has, as no other, found the secret of massing tree-forms and foliage on trees, which makes the leaf type the tree and the tree the leaf. A gigantic oak is lifted against the sky, in the two color tones of a single banner on its boughs, showing the misty green of the up side and grey of the down side. This scientific glance and grasp is suggestive of the whole range of Corot’s realism, which is interpenetrated with dreams of the ideal. He has helped the world to breathe and feel its atmosphere. Breadth of view is on the vision of those v who sit at his feet. He is the herald of the gentle dawn; the evangelist of the evening fields. “But he is monotonous,” says the critic—“grey, always grey.” “To thoroughly appreciate my landscapes,” said Corot, “it is at least necessary to have patience, to let the fog clear up. They are not easily understood, but when they are understood they ought to please.” His verdure and sunlight may seem to drift past us as under a veil, but on the farther side every object retains its relative value. The Divine Limnist works behind half-translucent curtains. The heavens have their azure of mystery, “And store the dew in their deeps of blue, Which the fires of the sun come tempered through.” France paid to Corot the signal honor of an exhibition of his works in the Melpomene, the grand hall of the Ecole des Beaux Arts. Two hundred of his can¬ vases occupied the walls where Baudry’s masterpieces won their unanticipated triumph. In 1833 he received a second-class medal ; two of the first class came to him in 1848 and 1855. In 1846 he received the Legion of Honor, and was made an Officer in 1867. A little while before his head was pillowed in final rest, the artists, independent of the official partisans of exhibitions, held a meeting, and offered Father Corot a gold medal. With radiant heartiness he thanked those whom he called his children. He had the privilege of never growing old ; his life was a perpetual artistic renovation. “ When young he had strolled singing over the plains ; advanced years found him just as free from care as he had been half a century before. We discovered him bent like a schoolboy over his themes to the last, now erasing with a movement of anger the study which would not come up to the example of nature contemplated by the artistic eye, now drawing back with sudden satisfaction to better calculate the effect of the effort ; when we would hear him from far off, approving himself aloud and awarding himself a prize, with the words ‘ Famous, that bit ! ’ or criticis¬ ing himself roundly with the sentence, ‘ We will begin it all over again, my lad ! ’ ” He passed serenely to his rest. On his final day he roused with a smile, and said : “ Last night, in my dreams, 1 saw a landscape with a sky all rosy. It was charming, and still stands before me quite distinctly ; it will be marvelous to paint.” Above Ville d’Avray there lingers yet a sky of rose, like the after¬ glow of an Egyptian sunset, and in that sky shines the steady star of his fame. CHARLES FRANCOIS DAUBIGNY N artist who has shown to the world a fresh view of the loveliness of nature. *■ *■ He had in a peculiar sense his own standpoint and individual equation, which gave glimpses and opened vistas hitherto sealed. He was born in Paris in 1817, and was the youngest of the famous Barbizon circle. His antecedents were favor¬ ing forces to his chosen vocation, his father and kindred being exhibitors at the Salon. He passed his curriculum in the studio of Delaroche, and appeared, when nineteen years old, with a picture and an etching in the Salon of 1836. Through a misapprehension as to terms of competition, he lost the Trix de Rome. Instantly he determined to go to the imperial mother at* his own charges. In company with his room-mate, named Mignan, he started on a tour to Italy. To meet the expenses of the expedition, they pinched and saved small sums, putting them in a hole punched in the wall. At the end of the year they tore down the wall and found eighteen hundred francs in their hands. Henriet, in his memoirs, narrates: “Daubigny and Mignan set out, knapsack on back, heavily shod, stick in hand, intoxicated with sunshine and liberty. They felt that all the world was their own. Their walk was one long enchantment as they saw new perspectives open every moment before their eyes and a succession of panoramas unrolled, at the richness, the accent, and the variety of which they marveled. Beyond Lyons they recognized with ecstasy the presence of the South by the intenser light of the sky and the grandeur of the landscape dressed in a vegetation unknown in our latitudes —the olive, the cypress, the pine, all the beloved trees of the antique idyl. They passed at last across the delightful garden shut in on the left by the first mountains of the Alps and on the right by the peaks of the Cevennes. At last they trod the epic soil of Italy. They visited Florence, Rome, and Naples, finally settling down to work at the old Roman resort of Subiaco.” The two friends remained in Italy a year, when again they started northward, heading for Paris, walking every foot of the distance and arriving penniless. But little trace of Italian influence can be found in the pictures of Daubigny, in which regard he distinctly differed from Corot, who absorbed with eagerness the classic charm of Italy, revealing it in his style ever after, most notably in his canvas of “Orpheus Greeting the Morn.” At the age of twenty-three Daubigny attained success, and never lost it. In 1848 he won a second-class medal, in 1853 one °f the first class. The seal was set upon his reputation when the Emperor, in 1852, purchased his picture of “The Harvest” for the Tuileries, following it, in 1853, with the purchase of another for St. Cloud. In 1859 he was invested with the Legion of Honor ; was made an Officer of the Order in 1875. The picture that won him the Cross of the Legion was “Springtime.” A peasant girl rides through a field of tender, upright grain ; the marked features in the landscape show groups of young apple trees, whose branches quiver with blos¬ soms. It was purchased by the government, and is now in the Louvre. Daubigny was destined to be the enchanter of the rivers of France. He built a large boat, which became his drifting studio and home. This was arranged for long trips ; the cooking was done on board ; there was a good wine cellar and well-filled larders. Here he adjusted his easel and “went on the watch” for scenes. He became a familiar figure to the peasants and boatmen along the banks of the Oise, the Marne, and Seine, who grew fond of him and called him “captain,” a title which gave him pleasure, as he affected, so far as his voyages would allow, to be a hardened sailor, made rugged by risky navigations. His “ Valley of the Optivoz,” painted in 1853, ranks a masterpiece. Of this picture the Count Clement de Riz says : “The eye rests on every part with pleasure and floats undecided between the sapphire of the sky and the velvet of the vegetation. One seems to smell the clover and hay, to hear the hum of the insects, and catch the sparkling of the light over the wheat fields.” His “Lock of the Optivoz,” exhibited in the Salon of 1855, was bought by the government, and is in the Louvre, as are also “Springtime” and the “Vintage.” In the special class of subjects to which he was drawn he was unrivaled and has found no successor. His influence on the art of the century, like sun-rays that have penetrated the earth, cannot be overestimated. Of him Albert Wolff says: “He brought to landscape painting the realistic keynote in the best sense of the term—that is to say, the matching of real objects by a deeply felt stroke, so that with each new sensation freshly breathed in the presence of Nature, he shifted his art ; in one picture, where the painter has paused to smile at the perfect grace of a landscape, his painting is full of the lambent flatteries which accompany a beam of the sun in the springtime; in another, where he has found himself astounded before the grandeur of the scene, he rises to the calm height of greatest art ; when the landscape had struck him, espe¬ cially by its general planes, he flung it on the canvas in those marvelous sketches which the artist refused to carry on further because he had nothing to add to this massy statement ; at other times he insinuates himself into details as exhaustively as possible and refines on his work to the utmost limits of execution. The career of Daubigny is based on the simple and truthful art theory that the handling of a picture ought to reflect the mood felt, that the painter can no more work perpetually in the same style than the writer can employ an unvarying form for the play of his thought.” When he reached the meridian of his triumphs, beset by collectors, solicited by dealers, fawned upon by Paris, he remained uncorrupted and could not be tempted like Pere Corot, who, in late life, not unfrequently did hurried service to his art in the shape of small panels, which the old man was pleased to call “little dreams.” Of the group to which he belonged he was perhaps nearest to Corot not only in artistic sympathy, but in tenderness of personal affection. He was therefore pained at noting his hasty work, and blamed him for it with some bitterness. Daubigny kept his heart sweet to the end. He died of a disease contracted through long exposures in his “La Bottin.” The damp river shores yielded winsome shadings of mist and light, but they also surrendered rheumatisms that clutched him remorselessly, lining his clear face with pain and aging him beyond his age. Death found him waiting without fear. As the vesture of his mortality was unclasped, his thoughts turned to those who had dropped their mantles before him, “his rivals in renown.” He said between final spasms for breath: “Adieu; I am going to see up there whether friend Corot has found me any new subjects for landscape painting.” ALEXANDRE GABRIEL DECAMPS HE picture by which Decamps entered the Salon of 1827 was that of a Turk, * which, it is said, was evolved from his inner consciousness. He had not yet visited the East, but the soft fire of a thoroughbred Orientalist glowed in his blood, originally kindled, perchance, through the arteries of some far-off ancestor. Decamps was born in Paris, March 3, 1803 ; he died at Fontainebleau, August 22, i860. He was sent, when a boy, into the country, where' he' raft wild ; his only companion¬ ship was that of peasants, whose patois he spoke, whose manners he imitated. This unrestrained period, lasting for three years, gained a strong grip on the development of his character, which was always impatient of restraint. His tastes gravitated to the unrefined side of society. Conscious of intense possibilities, he was eager to break the shell that limited them, yet unready to discipline his powers by that training and intelligence which are the impartial but arbitrary conditions of permanent success. Looking backward through misspent opportunities, he lived to grieve bitterly over the loss of that larger birthright which might have been his. Monsieur Chesneau, in the Chefs d’ffcole, says of Decamps’ youthful blunders: “Cruel chastisement for an hour of weakness at the decisive time ! he lived with the ■ crushing certainty that he had not expressed what was in him ; he died with the conviction of having left his work undone.” It was his ambition to rank as a great historical painter, but just here the fetter lay on his faculty ; he had not the academic training, the skill of fiber which means drill of force, the alert and technical vision which pierces the semblances of affairs and goes direct to the crimson center of life’s battle. Had Decamps known, in his formative period, the tuition of a great master, there would have been absolutely no measure to the display of his magnificent equip¬ ment. Bravely facing the inner captivities which he mourned, he has wrought a marvelous series of canvases, setting the almost fierce individualism of his work on the very eye-line of the world’s salon. There are critics who, differing from Decamps’ -judgment, feel that he has been the gainer for the lack and loss of early discipline. They say he was a predestined artist ; that his taste came without effort ; that his finest traits are found in what he did in defiance of the instruction he received ; that the heroic painters, the men of Titanic build, fail to indicate the slightest influence of their teachers. True ; but we must bear in mind that it appears a satire on the part ■ of Providence to appoint mediocre ability to develop the children of genius. The master of Decamps was Abel de Pujol, whom Albert Wolff classifies as really some¬ body under the Restoration, while waiting to be nobody at all under Louis Philippe. Decamps showed a large susceptible soul to the world of events around him. Sensi¬ tively responding to these, he took control of the facts they presented, sought the environment and local color with care, and then put them out through the luminous impressions of his own intelligence. The East he dreamed of in his studio at Fontainebleau was not the East he found when, inspired by the struggle of the Greeks for independence, he hurried to Athens, his brain full of the ideals of Pericles, his heart stung with ardor in their behalf. The disenchantment was not long in coming, not only there, but afterward in Asia Minor and along the shore¬ lines of the Mediterranean. When he had seen and digested the Greek, the Turk, the Arab on their native soils, he returned to Paris far wiser and quite willing to L break forever with those creatures that pose or stride in the average Eastern picture. It is not a matter of wonder that after dipping his brush in the actual sunlight of the Orient he became the colorist‘of his time. His effort never degenerates into trivi¬ ality. He paints a brace of beggars with the dignity of patriarchs, and an episode from a street corner in Cairo with the charm of an old world idyl. It has been observed that while Delacroix painted with color, Decamps painted with light. His figures are draped in the glow of the sun. He was attracted by scriptural themes, as evidenced in his “Samson” and “The Good Samaritan.” Honors were wel¬ comed, but to him appeared few and inadequate. He could not be satisfied, because unrestful before a goal unreached. He took his bread from the world, but found it a stone in his hand when he sought to feed his loftier aspirations. The lone¬ liness, the pathos of his career irritated his heart. We read the roll of his medals —Paris, 1831-1834 ; Legion of Honor, 1839 ; Officer of the same, 1851—and are certain that to him these were but small crests for the decoration .of an evening hour compared to the ideal for which his spirit thirsted. Suddenly thrown from his horse, and violently striking a tree, he was killed in the forest of Fontainebleau. ERNEST ANGE DUEZ TIE was born in Paris, March 8, 1843. His master in art was Carolus Duran. * As genre painter he obtained medals—third class, 1874, and first class, 1879 ; Legion of Honor, 1880. His large religious pictures brought him his first-class medal. Subsequently he turned aside from expressions of this character and took a more varied range of subjects. He painted animals, landscapes, portraits. His representations of street and cafe life have fine stories, told in a firm yet delicate strain. He has kept the freshness of his early emotions and the ardor of his original enthusiasms. His career not unfittingly stands for the counsel of Leonardo da Vinci : “It is not being a strong man among painters to succeed in only one thing—the nude, the head, animals, landscapes. There is no mind so gross that in time, with continued and earnest application to one thing, it cannot succeed in accom¬ plishing it satisfactorily. A painter should be universal, study everything he comes in contact with, render account of all that he sees, let nothing remarkable pass without keeping a sketch or reminder of it, and only cling to what is in all ways excellent.” HENRI LOUIS DUPRAY E was born at Sedan (Ardennes), November 3, 1841. A pupil of Pils and Leon 1 1 Cogniet. Patiently seeking the path of the historical painter, he has achieved solid success, ranking with Detaille as a leader in the new school of military artists. Fine composition, correct color, and vigorous treatment are combined with a thorough perception of the war spirit and a mastery of technical details. His soldiers are not men who have come out of an enamel factory, stiff and rigidly complete, not wanting a gaiter button, but are plastic forms drilled into strength, who have been under fire and have not flinched. Medals : 1872, 1874 ; Legion of Honor, 1878. FIRMAN-GIRARD HE favorite pupil of Gleyre was born at Poncin, 1838. Under his master's 1 suggestion he adopted a style of light genre subjects treated in fresh and luminous coloration. His medals were awarded—third class, 1863; second class, 1874. At the Salon of 1873 he exhibited “The Garden of the Godmother”; in 1874, “The Fiances,” a picture of unusual refinement. His “Flower Market” was a delightful epitome of Paris. The actual technique leaves nothing to be desired; every detail is elaborated with fidelity, but the amount of detail is excessive, the minutiae overdone. While no color note is missing, the theme lacks synthesis, that texture as a whole, that breadth of light and shade which becomes the har¬ monic utterance of a great picture achieved by Claude Monet’s “Field of Poppies.” Firman-Girard achieves it in another canvas, known as “The Flower Girl,” which has placed his reputation on an enduring basis. Here every value is balanced with the veritable touch of a master. The girl is a lovely outblossoming of flesh, pure, radiant, and naive; the perfumed chalices she cries are but garden echoes of herself. The Stewart collection gains in this example a melodic charm not to be found elsewhere. MARIANO FORTUNY T3EUS is a small thrifty town in the Province of Tarragona. An event significant * ^ for the universal art world occurred at six o’clock in the morning, June 11, 1838 : a man-child was born to Mariano Fortuny, a cabinetmaker, and his wife, Teresa Marsal. The waters of baptism consecrating this new pilgrim within a few hours after his advent, were administered by Juan Yxart, parish priest of the Church of St. Peter the Apostle. The child, named also Mariano • Fortuny, shot prophetic flashes into the near future, and foretold in early years the career he was destined to follow. When a mere lad he lost his father and mother. He often gypsied over the country, tramping leagues to display a group of wax figures. At the age of fourteen he left Reus, accompanied by his grandfather, who was taking him a journey of sixty miles, walking every foot of the distance, to meet M. Domingo Talarn. This artist was at once fascinated by the sketches shown him. On October 3, 1853, Mariano was registered on the rolls of the Academia de Bellas Artes, of Barcelona, where he remained until the end of 1856, studying meanwhile under M. Claudio Lorenzalez. In 18s5 he painted in distemper several themes of significant size based upon religious subjects. A strong impulse stirred his mind through the figure-work of Gavarni, whose influence he never ceased to feel. In November he began to fit himself for the competition for the prize of a pensioner at Rome, offered by the Provincial Council. He drew on wood, made cuts, lithographed, and etched. These variations produced little of value, but gave to eve and hand a certain subtle perception and deftness of touch which culminated in a mastery with the brush unsurpassed and rarely equaled. Fortuny gained, by the unanimous vote of the Council, the Prix de Rome, March 6, 1857. His subject was “Raymond Ill. Nailing the Arms of Barcelona to the Castle Tower of Foix.” He left for Rome March 14, 1858, and arrived five days later. One can picture this youth of twenty years confronting the garnered treas¬ ures, the serious commands, the majestic memories, the lofty ideals, the processional splendors of that imperial city. With keen discrimination and a naive independence of judgment, he writes of his impressions, under date of May 3d, to his old master, M. Lorenzalez : “ What I admire above all are the frescoes of Raphael at the Vatican, par¬ ticularly ‘Mount Parnassus,’ the ‘School of Athens,’ the ‘Dispute on the Holy Sacrament,’ and the ‘ Burning of Bergo.’ The other masters did not impress me as I expected. What I call a well-painted picture, and which I place above all others, is a portrait of Innocent X. by Velasquez. “ 1 know that it is necessary to exercise great prudence in the choice best adapted to one's talent, for, by reason of the many opportunities one has, it is as easy to retrograde as to obtain good results. I say this because 1 am discouraged by seeing how little it profits many among the painters, who pass entire months in these galleries, copying the great masters, and who afterwards do not know how to draw a face from memory.” It was at Rome that the powers of this child of Catalonia began to stir in their sheath, “and that,” says M. Gautier, “more by the blooming of his natural gifts than by the direct influence of the great masters whom the world goes to admire and copies on its knees. Don't let us in the least blame this worship, but it is good sometimes to follow the bent of our own nature, and to see with one’s own eyes.” Fortuny was susceptible to but was not enslaved by these enthroned dynasties of art set up through centuries of noble endeavor. He must take sunlight on his own retina, and his art, as he breathed the airs of the Albanian mountains, through the valves of his own life. He maintained to the last chapter of his earthly career a certain freedom of faith and valor of conviction that gave to his personality a name¬ less charm. After a stay of seven months he sent two pictures from his easel to M. Pedro Bover, of Reus, one showing a view of the Tiber, with the castle of St. Angelo in the distance; the other, “Nereides sur un lac,” at the fringe of a forest. He designed the funds secured from the sale of these to go to his grandfather. The old man wore out his heart in yearning for the child who had been his comrade as well as his kinsman, and died on the 19th of March, 1859, just a year after his grandson arrived in Rome and as the latter was about to express to him a “ Saint Mariano.” When war was declared between Spain and Morocco, the Town Council of Barcelona proposed to Fortuny to accompany the army to Africa to make studies and paint souvenirs of the campaign. He accepted their terms and left by the first steamer. He carried letters of presentation to the commander-in-chief, O’Donnell, and to Generals Ros d'Olano and Prim and a number of other eminent persons. He reached Tetuan in February in company with M. Escriu, who became later on his brother-in-law. The letters of introduction were of small account ; he suffered severe hardships, going often hungry and sleeping upon the ground. On the nth of March the battle of Samsa was fought. Fortuny pressing to the front, a ball spurted the dust at his feet. “Ah!” said a soldier, “that was meant for the painter,” but the painter was intent on business and paid scant heed to danger. On the 23d the bloody conflict of Wad-Ras came on, the Spaniards gaining a decisive victory. Throughout these experiences the artist was enlarging his world, popu¬ lating his brain, working incessantly, making sketches in oil and water color, figures massed and single, Arabs, soldiers, his fellow countrymen the Catalans, Jews, and landscapes. On the 23d of April he started with his friend for Madrid, which they reached at the same hour as the staff of the army of Africa. He was intro¬ duced at once by M. Augustin Rigalt to M. Federico Madrazo, who, seven years afterward, gave him his daughter Cecilia in marriage. His studies of the war were exhibited publicly in Barcelona and created general admiration. The Town Council sent an address to the governor of the province, which revealed a pride and solicitude worthy of the grandfather who was asleep in his grave at Reus. “The painter Fortuny has happily returned from Africa, where he collected, at the cost of great danger, and with a perseverance and zeal worthy of all praise, subjects of the highest interest, which he will doubtless use in the work the Town Council has entrusted to him. Your Excellency has seen his portfolios of sketches, souvenirs, and impressions, and will understand the great effect these drawings, so simple in appearance, will one day produce. So exactly do they show us the places where our heroic army has accomplished great deeds of arms ; also the dress, char¬ acter, and manners of our adversaries in this African war. “ Fortuny to this time has well done his honorable task, but this is not all. In order that the young painter may finish his noble work, for the glory and honor of his country, it is necessary his genius should feed upon, strengthen itself, and grow prolific by study of the great masters. The Town Council feels that it is need¬ ful that he should visit Paris, Munich, Berlin, Brussels, Milan, and Florence, to the end that, throwing a rapid coup d’ccil on their museums and artistic monuments, he can better reconcile with the principles of art his conceptions, as yet crude. A trip of six or eight weeks, with a companion so imbued with passion for the beauties of art, will suffice to accomplish what the Town Council proposes.” This plan was only realized in part. He studied in Paris, the Museum at Versailles, and later in that of Florence. His progress was rapid and brilliant. At Paris he frequently saw Meissonier, who was greatly drawn to him, for whom he in turn cherished the sincerest admiration, whose influence over him was one of maturing force. He painted his portrait, which afterward came into the possession of Mr. Stewart. The figure could but be fine; the pose is striking and martial, bending backward to show every line of the magnificent body, which wears a large curved sabre. By action of the Town Council Fortuny was requested to make a second visit to Africa to reimpress his mind with the locale and scenes of the battle of Tetuan. The war between Spain and Morocco cut out for him, as with a sabre stroke, his future career. He was then twenty-three years of age, thick-set, of powerful build, mercurial temperament, taciturn, resolute, and drilled to exertion. His tarrying in the East, which lasted from five to six months, was a revelation and a revel. He had never seen such light, such feasts of color, such figure compositions. It was here that he courted the sun and won him to the disclosure of his radiant mysteries. When the Emperor of Morocco arrived with his dashing suit to sign the treaty of peace, Fortuny was like a man driven to fever by the greatness of his opportunities. His hand flew over the pages of his note-book with lightning celerity. What he was sent to Algiers to do he never really did, but he did other things of far greater import. While the commission of the Academy of Barcelona remained half finished, and was in that state on his studio wall when he died, he filled his mind with a series of magnificent themes, which in after years came to a perfect realization under his brush. Among these we find the stalls of the Moorish carpet sellers filled with the tumult of barter, the weary old Arabs sitting in the sun, and the pensive, sombre faces of snake charmers. He addressed himself to etching and engraving, varying his eye with water colors of such virility as to rival works in oil. Fortuny’s handicraft was something remarkable. He modeled splendid vases and decorated them with the shimmering tones of Hispano-Moresque; he wrought in metals, inlaying them with delicate designs of gold; he forged a famous sword with an ivory hilt, worthy of the battle-belt of a Moorish king. In the autumn of 1866 he went again to Paris and found friends in Rico, Ferrandez, and Zamacoi's. The last introduced him to M. Goupil, who at once gave recognition to his talent, and started for him a credit of 24,000 francs per year. He returned to Madrid to arrange for his nuptials with the daughter of M. Madrazo. May, 1868, brought him again to Rome. Here he steadily devoted himself to his great theme, “A Spanish Marriage.” In this canvas and one other, “The Choice of a Model,” Fortuny’s gifts found their highest mani¬ festation. Great men have sunbursts of expressional power, when talent is exalted into genius and when genius glows with the afflatus of an unearthly inspiration. Such was Delacroix’s “Centaur Training the Young Achilles,” Rousseau’s “ Le Givre,” and Millet's “Sheepfold by Moonlight.” In 1870 Fortuny went to Granada to live, and installed himself at the Fonda de los Siete Suelos, on the same hill as the Alhambra, a short walk from the ancient palace of the Moorish kings. The quiet of the place, which had so charmed Henri Regnault, fascinated him. He counted the years spent there the sunniest of his life, writing to M. Simonetti : “ Figure to yourself the Villa Borghese on the summit of a mountain, sur¬ rounded by Moorish towns, and in the midst the most beautiful Arab palace, the elegance and ingenuity of ornament so great that the walls seem to be covered with guipure lace ! No suffering from heat, and one lives with such freedom that you might believe you were at home.” As indicative of the conscientious method through which Fortuny sought historical values for his easel, as well as the refreshment he perpetually brought to his eye, both in form and color, several letters are here opened. To his comrade, M. Rico : Granada, November 25, 1870. Dear Martin : I am delighted to learn that you feel inclined to come here. I think we can spend the winter profitably. We can paint courtyards and gypsies, when we please. Don’t trouble yourself about Zamacoi's. He will not come, and if he did come he would not stay two weeks in Granada. You know his nature. This quiet and want of bustle would not suit him. 1 will trouble you to ask at the Escurial Library for an Asiatic manuscript of the year 1400, on the game of chess ; it is illuminated with miniatures, certainly Italian ; see if it contains costumes, arms, and other details suitable for paintings ; in case it should 1 will have copies made for a small picture I intend to make. Thine, Fortuny. He was destined never again to meet Zamacoi's, who died suddenly from a seizure of angina pectoris. Granada, March, 1871. s Fonda de los Siete Suelos. A Monsieur le Baron Davillier. My Dear Friend: I am happy that nothing has happened to you in the midst of such misfortunes. 1 need not tell you how anxious I have been during the whole war in thinking of you ; am hardly at ease now, for lo ! the Commune again makes me tremble for you. As for me, I have some pictures begun, and many planned. Granada is an inexhaustible mine ; but you know it and I will not dwell on it. I have a picture under way, and I hope it will turn out well, but it will be by making use of you for documents and details ; no one at Paris can aid me better in this matter than you. In regard to objects of art which 1 have met with, I will especially mention a very fine manuscript of the fifteenth century, ornamented with many well-preserved miniatures, and of the best style, with the arms and portrait of the owner, etc. 1 will have photographs of it made, and send them to you, that you may give me your opinion about it. 1 have some books on fencing, for Beaumont, and a curious note relating to arms copied from a paper of the fourteenth century. Yours, Fortuny. After a long fight for daily bread, Fortuny surprised Fortune and swiftly turned into an Oriental prince, surrounded by masses of treasure, brilliant stuffs, Arabian war implements, glasses from Murano, vases from Pekin, malachite slabs resting on gilded satyrs, variegated marbles, and old tankards. There were four prime factors in the sum of Fortuny’s life — Gavarni, the war in Morocco, Cecilia de Madrazo, and his blessed patron, Mr. William H. Stewart. Under these four captions one could write his entire history. In the autumn of 1873 Fortuny changed his residence from the small house in the Via Gregoriana to a villa with surrounding gardens in the suburbs of the city. His studio adjoining offered space for the display of splendid fabrics, his faiences with sheens of gold, his ancient arms, and all his wealth of art objects, bronzes, and precious inlaid metals. A friend tells us “that he was petted and flattered by everybody." Notwithstanding that, he was, as he said, “worried without knowing why.” Was it a presentiment ? A projected visit to London occurred the first of June, and was prolific of inspirations. Here he met Millais, who welcomed him most cordially and exacted a promise of his return the following year. “ I have so many souvenirs in my head, it will take me months to think it all out,” he said. He left Paris for Rome, June 15th, accompanied to the Lyons station by his brother-in-law, Raymundo, and Baron Davillier, who embraced him, far from thinking that they should never see his face again. The fatal fever from which he suffered in 1869, returned with complications. He died November 2 1, 1874, at six o’clock in the evening, suffocated by vomiting blood. The personality of Fortuny has won a widening recognition, achieving a renown that must forever place him in front of the leading line of the artists of his century. Out of the large group of those who have done him honor, we choose a few voices to form a symposium upon his character and his art. The Baron Davillier speaks: “Fortuny was above middle height, robust in appearance ; the frankness and truthfulness of his character were reflected in his face, which was both handsome and sympathetic. He had a horror of etiquette and ceremony, and his natural timidity made him reserved, one might almost say a little rough, with those whom he knew not intimately, showing himself, on the contrary, very genial with those he loved, avoiding trivial talk and giving a serious turn to conversation. Surrounded by numerous flatterers, he distinguished, with extraordinary tact, true and disinterested friends from egotists, speculators, and false brothers in art. As for him, he was the truest and most devoted friend a man could find ; he despised envy and never descended to a feeling so base. “Fortuny had for music a very correct taste. Mozart and Beethoven were the masters he most admired. He loved reading much, especially the Latin historians and poets. His passion for curiosities is known. His collection, had he lived, would soon have become one of the most remarkable in Europe. His manual dexterity was marvelous, as the Moorish sword forged by him shows, of which the handle, inlaid with silver and carved in ivory, equals the most beautiful ancient work. 1 have not the knowledge necessary to judge of the talent of Fortuny. Every one knows that his individuality was very marked. If he had many imitators, it can be said he never sought to imitate any one.” We listen to M. Theophile Gautier in his official journal of May, 1870 : “ The name which has been oftenest spoken for the past four months in the world of art is surely that of Fortuny. One question never failed, when artists and amateurs met—‘Have you seen Fortuny’s paintings?’ For Fortuny is a painter so marvelously original, of finished talent, sure of himself, although the artist was barely within the age of a competitor for the Prix de Rome. The traveled artists, and the students who came back from the Villa Medici, speak most highly of a young man admirably gifted, whom they consider of great force, working at Rome in a fantastic way, beyond all influence of schools. But the foreign name they mentioned, unsup¬ ported by any work, was not remembered. The ‘Spanish Marriage,’the ‘Serpent Charmer’—easel paintings; the ‘Carpet Seller in Morocco,’ the ‘Cafe of the Swallows,’ ‘The Kief’—water colors, of a strength of tone that compete with oil, give an incontestable value to the name of Fortuny, and prove that the reports about him have not at all been exaggerated.” Prof. John C. Van Dyke, in an able review of this collection, prominently marks Fortuny : “There be artists who have harped on one note their life long, but Fortuny was not one of them. His was not a labored versatility, but a spontaneous and natural outburst. What others did by virtue of stubborn will, he apparently did with the strength and ease of genius. And how irresistible his few effective brush¬ strokes raise in us the sense and feeling of power! One night a dispute arose among some friends as to the position of a certain square in a Spanish city. Fortuny took a stick, wrapped around the end of it some frayed linen, mixed some ink and water together in a saucer, and upon some ordinary wrapping-paper drew the square, buildings, people, sky, air, and all ; and to-day it hangs in Mr. Stewart’s gallery as effective a ‘black and white’ as one would care to look upon.” M. Henri Regnault : “I have seen some of Fortuny’s studies, which are prodigies of color and bold painting. Ah ! what a painter that boy is ! 1 have also seen two ravishing eaux-fortes by him. His pupil, Simonetti, who works in his studio, has shown me some charming things now under way. Two fine fel¬ lows, and how well they get on ! What skill—how pleasing in color—what true genius—what spirit in the touch ! “Day before yesterday 1 passed the whole day with Fortuny, and that has broken my arms and legs—he is wonderful, that fellow ! What marvels are in his house ! He is master of us all. If you could see the two or three pictures he is now finishing, and the water colors he has recently completed ! ! ! It is that which disgusts me with mine—oh, Fortuny ! I can’t sleep for you ! I am not proud ; Fortuny makes me pale with fear. I can no longer see what I have done or what I am doing. Look how a water color should be painted—what color, what charm, what drawing ! Long live Spain—long live the East—long live Fortuny—immortality for Fortuny ! ” M. Thomas Couture : “Oh, the beautiful things. I dreamed of them all night. They are the life, the light, the budding of spring, the colors with which God has painted the flowers. It is not painting, it is not work, it is not human. All sparkles with sunshine and genius ; all is transformed by a magic prism. The vulgar becomes poetic, and satire amiable.” M. Charles Yriarte : “In his genre he was the head of a school. Endowed with a profound talent for manipulation, he created the ecole de la main (school of the hand). His science, united with a certain charm to which every one yielded ; his love of light, his worship of the sun, and a unique something in the choice, the idea, and the rendering of his subjects, made for him a reputation which was legiti¬ mate. Fortuny has many imitators, but the majority of them fail to represent in their works, as he did, the character—the soul of things.” We pause for a moment ere we give audience to the voice of one who did more to shape the triumphant course of Fortuny than any other, whose cheer and strengthening sympathy passed like a sea breeze through the lungs of a tired man, whose tact and steadfast friendship braced the ambitions and gave fresh impulses to the ideals of this magician of art. We refer to Mr. William H. Stewart, of Phila¬ delphia, the first American patron of Fortuny. We prelude his testimony with a letter which reveals his relations with the rising young men of his time. This letter was penned after Mr. Stewart himself had passed into the silence of the eter¬ nities. It is from M. Martin Rico to M. Montaignac, of Paris, the distinguished connoisseur : Dear Friend : It was about 1867 that 1 made the acquaintance of Mr. Stewart. He immediately ordered two landscapes of me, although 1 was then absolutely unknown. Since that time, whenever 1 returned from my travels, the first visit 1 received was from him and from my friend Madrazo, the two persons who took the deepest interest in me. Although people may say that 1 am not disinterested in the matter, I take great pleasure in stating that I have never known a connoisseur more intelligent than Mr. Stewart and more untiring in seeking good pictures without ever considering the price. He had great influence at that time for the Spanish painters. The dealers hesitated in the selection of artists and the price to pay them, and it was he, with his delicate taste and correct eye, who discovered painters and interested himself in them. He certainly was the greatest power at that moment in the artistic market of Paris. I lost in Mr. Stewart a friend, a protector, and almost a father. He made his house ours, and I owe my position in great part to him. His greatest pleasure was the society of artists, and what I say for myself may be said also for Fortuny, Madrazo, Zamacois, and many others. He was the type of the most perfect caballero whom 1 have ever known, and you need only look at the collection of letters which the artists have written to him to be convinced of this. His gallery of pictures will show the world more than 1 can say. Mr. Stewart, writing to Baron Davillier, says : “1 heard of Mariano Fortuny for the first time in January, 1868, through Edward Zamacois, the much lamented and talented artist, who died at Madrid, January 12, 1871, at the early age of twenty-nine. “He it was who took me to the Messrs. Goupil & Co., No. 9 Rue Chaptral, Paris, to see some ten very fine water colors, and pen-and-ink drawings, just received from Rome, with Fortuny’s signature. Four of these were immediately secured by me at a very modest price, and two or three months later Zamacois brought me word from these dealers that they had an oil painting by Fortuny, and I must at once go with him to see it. “We started on the instant, and found, at the Rue Chaptral, the ‘Fantasia Arabe.’ My companion went into ecstasies, calling it ‘a pearl,’ ‘jewels,’ etc., at the same time whispering to me to buy it, and not to let it slip at any price. The sum named was comparatively trifling, and this fine work became mine. “I then determined to visit Rome and make the acquaintance of Fortuny, and in December, 1868, induced Zamacoi's, our common friend, to join me, telegraph¬ ing the artist in advance to engage rooms for us. I took with me a little painting by Meissonier, entitled ‘Suite d’un Jeu des Cartes,’ as Fortuny had requested his brother-in-law, Madrazo, 1 should do, having seen, up to that time, only photographs of this great master’s works. “On our arrival in the Eternal City we found him awaiting us at the railway depot, and were then conducted to the apartments he had engaged for us on the Corso, not far from his own residence. His reception of me was extremely cordial, frank, and open, for which, doubtless, I was indebted to Zamacoi's, of whom he was very fond. He soon took me into his intimate friendship, which terminated only with his death. “ In person, Fortuny was the beau ideal of an artist, in the full vigor of youth, with the build and strength of an athlete, and rather above the medium height. His head, perhaps, was a little too large, but highly intellectual, and covered with a profusion of dark-brown curly hair, and his eyes were a clear violet color, having a most anxious, inquiring expression. In manner he was quiet and serious, but of an affectionate, gentle, and most generous nature. Simply because 1 had complied with his modest request, in taking with me to Rome the little Meissonier painting mentioned above, he painted for me an aquarelle, called ‘An Arab Street,’ dedicated it to me as his friend, and it is now considered one of the finest gems in my collec¬ tion. Henri Regnault served as a model for its principal and central figure. He obtained for me also another beautiful water color, which was nearly finished and on his easel, having been painted for d’Epinay, the French sculptor. This, and the ‘Arab Street,’ 1 carried back in my trunk to Paris, and would have been pleased to have taken everything he had. “ The ‘ Vicaria,’ or ‘ Spanish Marriage,’ was begun. 1 was not able to get it, as he was under contract to the Goupils, but he promised to finish the ‘Academicians Choosing a Model,’ which I gladly accepted in its stead, and have congratulated myself ever since on its acquisition. “Some of the incidents of our stay in Rome will tend to prove the admiration in which he was held by those eminent artists, Zamacoi's and Regnault. The latter asked him why he never exhibited in the Paris Annual Salon, and he replied : ‘ I have never anything worth the showing, and 1 am not a Frenchman ; but why don’t you?’ ‘I have nothing,’ answered Regnault. ‘Then,’ said Fortuny, ‘go and ask d’Epinay for the head you gave him ; it is excellent. You can add some canvas, and make a capital picture.’ “ Regnault took his advice, got the head and carried it to Spain, and the result was the now celebrated painting, known as ‘Salome,’ which he exhibited the following year, with his portrait of General Prim. “One day, while we were in his studio watching him at work, he asked Zamacoi's to paint something for him as a souvenir of his visit. ZamacoTs began at once on a small panel the figure of ‘Arlequino,’ Fortuny’s favorite man model, and after working three or four hours and scratching out as many times, he gave up in despair, threw the little board into a corner, and said to me: ‘Don Guillermo, no puedo mas!’ (I cannot do any more.) We went into the garden, and Zamacoi's exclaimed : ‘ 1 can now breathe freely, but 1 cannot do so where Mariano paints ! He absorbs all the light, color, and air ; in fact, he is enough to disgust one with one’s own work, for he is the only one who can paint ! ’ “On this same garden opened the studios of Moragas and the Duchess Cas- teglione Colonna. The latter, known in art circles as Marcello, the sculptress, professed the greatest admiration for Fortuny and profited largely by her proximity to his studio and the advice given therein. This may be seen- in her bronze statue of a ‘Fury,’ under the main stairway of the Paris Opera House. “As stated by Davillier, in the spring of 1870 Fortuny came to the French capital, and installed himself and family in the Maison Valin, on the Champs Elysees. Here he finished the ‘Vicaria,’ and his three most important aquarelles, ‘The Reader,’ ‘The Turkish Carpet Dealer,’ and the ‘Torrero.’ While at work on the ‘ Vicaria,’ the artist Meissonier dropped in to see him, just as he was in need of a suitable model for a cavalry officer, whom he wished to introduce into the picture. Hearing of his want, the great French artist said: ‘I am the only man who has the proper legs for the character you need, and if you will come out to Poissy 1 will serve as your model.’ “ Fortuny accepted, went to Poissy, and painted to the life this wonderful man. I am the happy possessor of this remarkable and curious portrait of Meissonier by Fortuny, through the generosity of his widow, who presented it to me after her husband’s death. The fact that Meissonier served as a model to the younger painter reveals the former's admiration, and that he was seriously impressed by this great genius, cannot be doubted. “ A strange and sudden death occurred at the Maison Valin while Fortuny was staying there. Canaveral, a friend of his, came from Spain with about one hundred old paintings and some drawings, and went to the same house. Fortuny, assisted by Zamacoi's and Rico, endeavored to clean and arrange these paintings for exhi¬ bition, so that they might be sold for the benefit of his friend, but for a fortnight no purchaser appeared. At last a well-known dealer called, and fell dead while looking at the collection, and poor Canaveral failed to effect any sales. If I had not bought from him a very beautiful aquarelle, painted by our artist, and doubtless a present to his old friend, Canaveral would have been without the means to return home with his pictures. “At that time I was residing in the Avenue d’Jena, and 1 shall never forget the day of Victor Noir’s burial. He had been killed a few days before by Prince Pierre Bonaparte, at Auteuil. It seemed as if the entire working population of Paris had turned out, dressed in clean blouses, and armed with implements of their different trades, to do honor to the dead, or mischief to the living who might oppose their demonstration. 1 started from home about ten in the morning, to go, with Zamacols and Fortuny, on a visit to Meissonier, at Poissy. We met this crowd of ill-disposed operatives marching toward Neuilly, the residence of the mother of the deceased. Returning to Paris at 4.30 p.m., we parted with Zamacols at the St. Lazare station, and Fortuny and I, taking a cab together, started for our homes, but on attempting to cross the Champs Elysees, near the Palais d’Industrie, we were prevented by a large body of cavalry and artillery which occupied the space from the Rond Point to the Place de la Concorde. “Facing this military mass was another, of nearly 100,000 blouses, filling the Avenue des Champs Elysees as far as the Arc de Triomphe, and far beyond, into the Avenue de la Grande Armee. Arm in arm they came marching towards the troops, singing the Marseillaise, and headed by Henri Rochefort, who was riding in a cab. It appears that he had fainted once or twice during the day, from excite¬ ment or from fear of failure in his undertaking, which was to conduct the crowd past the Tuileries Palace. “ We were, of course, obliged to make a great detour, in order to reach our homes. This was the beginning of the end of the Second Empire, which was overthrown on the 4th of September following. “ About this time my wife, being anxious to have a portrait of me by Fortuny, asked him to paint one. He immediately said he would if she would let him have his painting of the ‘Antiquary.’ Taking this with him, he obtained a photograph of me, and a few days later returned the painting with my portrait introduced, which is considered by artists and friends to be a most striking likeness. This same picture of the ‘ Antiquary ’ he had given, a year or two previous, to Capo Bianchi, the dealer in Rome, in exchange for an Arab gun and a broken Venetian glass, these articles being worth about 200 francs. “ Madrazo and I have often remarked that what seemed to strike strangers, on entering Fortuny’s studio, was himself, more than his work. The living picture was really interesting : one could not fail to be impressed by that fine intellectual head, with its regular but expressive features; his appearance of full, vigorous health, and his becoming, careless dress. His wife, in the bloom of her youth and beauty, seated by his side and mending an old piece of tapestry while he painted, lent a charm to the picture, well calculated to draw one’s first glances from even his brilliant creations. “Many of his evenings were passed at our house. He was fond of music and conversation, to both of which he was an attentive listener, though preferring often to be drawing, in which he frequently indulged when with us. He would sometimes take away with him a photographic portrait of some head or person which happened to strike his fancy, and copy it most exactly in India ink or sepia. In this way I have the likeness of one Amos Foster, known at Torresdale, Philadel¬ phia, as ‘ Bos ’—copied so closely by Fortuny that it is difficult to distinguish it from the photograph. “It was about this time that the ‘Vicaria’ was finished and upon its easel. One day a gentleman called and, after admiring the picture greatly, said he would like to own something by the same artist. Messrs. Goyena and Madrazo being present, acted as interpreters, as Fortuny could not then speak French, and replied that he could not promise, as he was under contract to the Goupils. The visitor, expressing much regret at this, concluded by giving Fortuny carte blanche to paint whatever he pleased for him without regard to price, handed his card to Goyena, and departed. Goyena read aloud his card : “ ‘ Monsieur Duglairy, “ 1 Chef dn Caft! Anglais.' “Fortuny received it as a pleasantry, and would not believe the fact until he had read the card himself. The three friends, however, determined to visit this culinary artist and breakfast at his celebrated cafe the following day. When the hour arrived they entered the dining-rooms and said they preferred giving their orders to the chef, who shortly appeared. Recognizing the trio, he made many apologies for the manner in which his art suffered, owing to the use of mineral coal in the economic cooking-ranges now in use, but said he would do his best. He gave them indeed a splendid repast, after which he invited them to visit his Japanese collection, valued by experts at more than one million francs. And this man is the head cook, and one of the present proprietors of the Cafe Anglais ! “ Fortuny left Paris late in the spring for Spain, and established himself and family in the Alhambra at Granada, in company with Rico and Ricardo Madrazo. Here he started work on some of his finest inspirations. Little dreaming that we should be separated from Fortuny for so long a time by the Franco-Prussian War, we started for Trouville, where we spent the months of July, August, September, and part of October. The Prussian lines, however, were extending in every direc¬ tion and encompassing the French, so 1 deemed it prudent to take my family to Torquay, England, where we passed nearly six months agreeably, occasionally hearing from Fortuny and Rico through Zamacoi's and Don Federico Madrazo, both of whom resided in Madrid. \ “On the 12th of January, 1871, Zamacoi’s died in Madrid, and the sad news was announced to us by a letter from his widow, dated three days later. “ Immediately after the surrender of Paris I went over with Saintin, a French artist, to the conquered capital for the purpose of looking after my affairs, and three or four days after our arrival the reign of the Commune began. We remained, however, three weeks or more, until it became too hot for us, and then persuaded Madrazo—who had passed through the siege, serving manfully in the American Ambulance—to return to England with us, and in April we all moved to London. A week later Goupil & Co., who were established in the English metropolis, sent me word that they had received from Granada three paintings by Fortuny and two by Rico. We went to see them, and 1 bought two of Fortuny’s and one of Rico’s paintings. “ When the Commune was put down we returned to France, entering Paris two days after the Versailles or government troops took possession, and were in time to witness the Tuileries, the Hotel de Ville, the Treasury, the Palace of the Legion of Honor, and other buildings, still burning, and smouldering in ruins. “ In the fall of 1871, during my absence in the United States, Fortuny sent two oil paintings to the Goupils. They were bought by MacLean, of London, who, failing to dispose of them without loss in England, returned them to Goupil for sale, where 1 found them on my return, and at once purchased both. It was evident that the British public did not appreciate Fortuny, nor had the French learned full confidence in his genius, till after his third visit to Paris, in 1873. As I was again absent in America at this time, 1 had not the pleasure of seeing him until the spring of 1874. “ During his stay at the Alhambra he worked hard, and in the numerous letters I received from him while there, he expressed the greatest enjoyment in his occupa¬ tions, and in the beauty, the quiet, and the climate of Granada. At times he sent me photographs, and, again, pen-and-ink drawings of what he had done or was doing. In this way I was able to order the paintings owned by the Honorable Mr. A. E. Borie, and Mr. H. W. Gibson, of Philadelphia. Before leaving Granada for Rome, he sent a beautiful little oil painting‘of a fruit-stall, painted at the Alhambra, in which he introduced his wife and children, as a souvenir to Mrs. Stewart. “From Rome he continued his intimate correspondence with me, all his letters containing beautiful sketches and drawings, which I have preserved most carefully as marvels of art. “In 1874, as stated above, he came again to Paris, bringing with him the ‘Academicians Choosing a Model,’which he painted for me; the ‘Poet’s Garden,' bought by Mr. Heeren ; ‘An Arab Horseman,’and a ‘Torso,’ for Mr. Errazu ; ‘A Large Arab,’ with a wonderful background of carpets ; ‘A Lady in a Garden’ ; ‘The Cochinos,’ a study of flowers, and the ‘Roman Carnival.’ The last three he took back to Italy, intending to keep them for himself. During this last visit 1 saw a great deal of him, and he left us, to return to Rome, in good spirits, saying that he was going to paint to please himself and not the dealers. He complained, however, of his digestion, and was obliged to be very careful in his diet, but none of his friends gave the slightest thought to his complaint. “On Sunday, the 22d of November, 1874, Madrazo, Rico, and Saintin came to breakfast with me. After we had finished, Madrazo told us he had received a telegram the night previous, announcing Fortuny’s illness, and asking him to proceed to Rome immediately, but as the dispatch came too late he was unable to take the express train until that same Sunday evening. We all concluded Fortuny's case was desperate, and could only hope for the best. “They left me, but at six in the evening Rico returned, sobbing, scarcely able to utter the words, ‘ He is dead.’ “The truth is, he died before the first dispatch was sent, as the second proved, which was sent simply to hasten Madrazo’s departure. This was the end of one of the best of men and one of the greatest artists of his time.” GAVARNI E are in the presence of the greatest character draughtsman France has ever “ ' known. His family name, Guillaume Sulpice Chevalier, is lost under his famous nom deplume. Born in Paris, 1804; died, 1866. Chevalier of the Legion of Honor. He played with his pencil in childhood, but had attained his majority when he met M. Blaisot, who gave him an order for an album of sketches. In 1824 he went to Bordeaux to execute works for the engraver Adam, but soon broke with him, and set out for the Pyrenees on a walking tour. At Tarbes he made the acquaintance of M. Leden, the Registrar of the Signal Service, who bore him company on many of his excursions. He filled his book with peasants in all phases of their life and cos¬ tumes. He returned to Paris in May, 1828, still busy with types, sketching con¬ stantly, but failing to earn money. It was suggested that he should interview Susse, the dealer, and exhibit his water colors. Susse was willing to purchase his collection on the condition that he should sign them. Seizing a pen, he wrote “Gavarni,” and from that moment lost his baptismal name. Gradually he gravitated to his real voca¬ tion: caricature, the art of the grotesque for purposes of satire. This is preeminently the art of the modern ages." There was small hint of it among the ancients, only three papyri of a satirical tendency being known to exist in Egyptian archives, and these are more droll than ironical. The Greeks had gifts for pictorial parody, as shown in antique vases sketched with burlesque themes ; the Romans put the grotesque into plastic expression, as seen in frescoes unearthed at Pompeii and Herculaneum ; but the caricaturists of the olden time must be sought for rather in the poets and dramatists than among painters and sculptors. Through the long dusk of the middle ages any quantity of material was amassed for the study of the grotesque, but it was unvitalized, without form, and voiceless. The art of pictorial irony was born in the birth-pangs of the Renaissance. It is said that the earliest genuine example (1499) is a comic gravure relating to Louis XII. and his Italian war. The Reformation in Germany led to a full seeding for satirical ephemerae. The prototypes of the cartoons that smirk from the pages of Punch and Charivari are the heads of Martin Luther and Alexander VI. In England the sixteenth century was innocent of this charge, the only exception being a feeble effort to show Mary Stuart as a mermaid. The eighteenth century was preeminently the age of caricature, evidenced in the domain of literature as in that of art. Smith, Smollett, and Fielding, no less than Hogarth and Gillray, were expert in ironies. In the hands of Gillray political caricature became almost epic in majesty of conception, breadth of treatment, and far-reaching suggestiveness. An English critic remarks “that it is to the works of this man of genius that historians must turn for the popular reflection of all the political notabilia of the end. of the eighteenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century.” Spain discovers an artist capable of competing with the English group in the works of Francis Goya, which are described by Theo- phile Gautier as a mixture of Rembrandt, Watteau, and the comical dreams of Rabelais. Champtleury discerns analogies between him and Honore Daumier, the greatest caricaturist of modern France. Daumier was ideal in carrying a single character through a series of pictures, showing with each some fresh travesty ; such were Robert Macaire, Bertrand, and Ratapoil. In one he shows the country politician canvassing for votes, seeking, as usual, to save the people. Mr. Henry James thus uncovers this admirable page: “A sordid but astute peasant, twirling his thumbs on his stomach and looking askance, allows the political adviser to urge upon him in a whisper that there is not a minute to i ose —to lose for action, of course—if he wishes to keep his wife, his house, his field his heifer, and his calf. The canny skepticism in the ugly, half-averted face of the typical rustic, who considerably suspects his counselor, is indicated by a few masterly strokes. This is what the student of Daumier recognizes as his science, or, if the word has a better grace, his art. It is what has kept life in his work so long after so many of the occasions of it have been swept into darkness.” Journalism and caricature were often workers in the same field up to 1845, but the alliance was uncertain and brief. It became the mission of Charles Philipon, the peculiar and emphatic exploiter of comic journalism, to make it lasting. La Carica¬ ture, founded by Philipon in 1831, and suppressed in 1833, was followed by La Charivari. It is here that we find Gavarni, who brought modern social caricature, in its present guise, to a perfect expressional form. The Commune was a forcing process for the production of artists of this school who were well endowed with both ability and bitterness. Gavarni ranks foremost among these pictorial satirists. The years between 1840 and 1847 may be taken as his best period. As a recorder of the manners of his time, he produced work possessing the purest qualities, with such seriousness of aim as to insure it permanent place and consideration. He was the mate of Balzac; his peer in power and his intimate friend. Any effort to pass in review Gavarni’s artistic record would be wearisome. The following are a few of his examples that have found enthusiastic appreciation: “The Impostures of Women in Some Matters of Sentiment,” “Dreams,” “The Muses,” “ Lessons and Counsels,” “ The Martyrs,” “ The Students of Paris,” “The Terrible Children,” “Masks and Visages.” JEAN LEON GEROME VERY official honor that can fall at the feet of a great artist in France has fallen ' to Leon Gerome. He has been a Commander of the Legion since 1878, a member of the Institute since 1875, a professor of the Ecole des Beaux Arts since 1863. The Medal of Honor has been given to him twice. His creations are dis¬ tributed throughout the museums, public galleries, and great private collections of the world. He has a cabinet filled with decorations in bronze and gold. Gerome was born in the Haute-Saone, at Vesoul, on the nth day of May, 1824. He won his first medal in the Salon of 1847 by “The Fighting Cocks.” While he was executing this picture he said to Delaroche : “I try to paint honestly, clinging to nature, but I am still unskillful ; it is flat and thin.” “Yes,” his master responded, “you are right, but there are originality and style.' You will do better later ; in the meantime do not be anxious ; exhibit your picture—exhibit it. It will do you honor.” His picture was “skied.” Nevertheless the near-sighted Gautier managed to discover the “Cock Fight,” and the day following wrote in the columns of La Presse: “Let us mark with white this lucky year, for unto us a painter is born. He is called Gerome. 1 tell you his name to-day, and to-morrow it will be celebrated.” He was the pupil of Delaroche, whom he followed to Rome half a century ago. He visited Russia and Egypt, finding in the latter a wealth of suggestion for his brush. It was not in the studies of his first visit to Egypt that he disclosed his real power. These are superficially captivating and of easy translation through the average conventional keys found in Orientalism. Edmond About was not astray concerning this period of Gerome’s work when he said : “His views in Egypt are interesting, apart from the merit of execution, which is little. One finds in them neither a very profound study of form, nor a very active feeling of strength, nor a very passionate love of color.” The public differed from About’s judgment, and crowded to see these productions. It was at this time that Gerome hung his “Duel After a Masked Ball.” Few pictures have become so familiar to the popular eye. The artist has coldly taken his theme and rendered it with fearful force. He reveals the weight of the invisible tiger of remorse already bending the shoulders of the victor as he goes away into the ghastly dawn. The central figure of the lifeless Pierrot, the victim of that encounter, is beyond criticism. The man has not swooned; he is not dying—he is dead. The “Death of Caesar” might be placed as a pendant to the “Duel.” It has been said that in Gerome’s initial draft for this canvas the body of Caesar, lying prostrate before the statue of Pompey, was the only figure in the deserted hall, while bloody footprints, intermingled and confused, leading toward the door, alone told of the flight of the murderers. Should this gossip be true the artist marred his tragic story by massing gesticulating, fleeing senators in the background, and spoiled the stern simplicity of his original conception. Art may be greater in what it suggests than in what it plainly tells. Gerome exhibited in 18^5 “ Le Siecle d'Auguste.” He seeks to embrace in one vast canvas the reign of Augustus, which was the culmination of pagan history. From this apex, civilization slowly declines into the deepening shadows of the middle ages. Alfred Tanouarn, in i860, thus paragraphs the picture: “ Augustus is on his throne, overlooking the scene. Near him is stationed a young man virile in form, a symbolic image of the genius of Rome. At the right of the prince are the political notabilities of the epoch, on his left the artists and poets. Farther away, upon the lower steps of the temple, lies the body of the assassinated Caesar, before which Cassius and Brutus are standing erect, the former holding a dagger ; opposite, the dead bodies of Cleopatra and Antony are thrown upon each other; below, on both sides, the conquered people seem to be adoring the majesty of triumphant Rome. Finally are seen the infant Jesus, Mary, and Joseph—a mystic group that an angel covers with its wings. This is an intermediate work between history and allegory.” It is manifest that the artist’s purpose was to show the power by which revolutions were to turn the world through the gates of new horizons ; the power was the Christ-child shielded by wings. This painting gained for Gerome the red ribbon. Soon after he started again for Egypt. Writing to a friend, he says : “Probably among my ancestors a Bohemian must have slipped in, for 1 have a nomadic tendency and the bump of locomotion.” He saw Egypt with fresh eyes and matured mind. When we study the output of this second journey into the Nile valley, we are conscious of coming face to face with history, tabulated with rare precision and strength. At the close of the Salon of 1874 he obtained the Grand Medal and touched a prime which has since simply refused to wane. In the Universal Exhibition at Paris in 1878, Gerome uncovered his hand as a sculptor. His “ Combat of the Gladiators” obtained wide recognition and emphatic praise. It is said that when he has “failed to find any detail of armor or costume that was necessary to finish his work he would leave the Boulevard de Clichy for the Naples Museum, make sketches there of what he desired, and return¬ ing to his atelier by the express train, continue his labor and reinstall himself before his group in clay, that had not hardened during this rapid journey to Italy.” Fifteen years ago it was the privilege of the writer to meet him in his splendid studio. The picture known as “The Two Majesties” was on an easel. A lion with lifted front, from a projecting rock, across leagues of landscape, calmly faced the rising sun. It was impossible to restrain the inward whisper: “ Here are not two, but three majesties—the lion, the sun, and Gerome ; the last having on his brow the flash of a triple crown.” EDWARD JOHN GREGORY HIS artist recalls the note struck by Alfred Parsons in English landscape work. 1 He has produced portraits of quiet charm and attained significant regard from connoisseurs. He was born in Southampton, 1850. First studied in the South¬ ampton and then at the South Kensington art schools, subsequently in the Ecole des Beaux Arts. Carolus Duran was his master. He is a member of the Institute of Painters in Water Color, and was made an A. R. A. in 1883. He is repre¬ sented here by an interesting example in black and white, “The War in the East.” HENRI HARPIGNIES X TE confront a passionate lover of art in Henri Harpignies. His birthplace was ' ' Valenciennes ; his advent July 28, 1819. Equally in oil and water colors he has taken highest rank. He studied with Achard, visited Italy, and made his manners to the Salon in 1853, since which date he has exhibited regularly. His “Evening in the Roman Campagna ” received a medal in 1866, which was so cordially granted that it repaired somewhat the neglect of the year preceding. This picture is at the Luxembourg. He was medaled in 1868 and 1869 ; second class, 1878 ; Legion of Honor, 187s ; Officer, 1883. Harpignies came of a wealthy family of merchants, who restrained his tendency to art. He was twenty-seven years old when he appeared in the studio of Achard, who was the dignified embodiment of academic methods. Upon a certain occasion, after searching far for picturesque views, both found themselves in the magnificent valley of Cremieux. ' Achard told his pupil that he did not care to have him undertake a number of studies ; that two would be sufficient—an effect of growing day and another of evening lights. Har¬ pignies began, and had one well advanced. The interpretation was of remarkable sincerity, but a slight limitation awaited his gifts. In a corner of the landscape was a group of small trees, the rare foliage of which seemed like frosted lace blown about by the wind. The hand of Harpignies lacked the lightness required for the rendering of such a delicate subject. For eight days he struggled, rubbed out, began again and again, only to efface his efforts. On the ninth day he said to himself that the trees did not stand for any important value in his landscape, so he quietly suppressed them behind a tint of azure. After this deed he returned, satisfied at having given a lesson to Nature. But he had calculated without his master. When Achard came to inspect his work, there was a glance of surprise, then of incredulity, then of greater surprise ; finally a frown of indignation, followed by an explosion, as, with angered voice, he thundered : “Sir, you will have those trees in your picture to-morrow, or you will go home.” There came a time when Harpignies was not less exacting with himself, which accounts for his enduring hold on fame. He was a scientific student of values in color, proceeding,at the first with “neutrals.” He is unsurpassed in his balancing of sky and water, in composing, and then translating the harmony of masses. He was devoted to music. Here is a line from his note¬ book : “One must play with the brush as one plays with the strings of a violin.” This reveals the order of his art ; there was no wayward impulse defying the regnant tones of nature. He sought only to enter the sweep of her rhythmic laws, striking the chords as light strikes a cloud, “ drawing color for a tune, with a vibrant touch." In the foreground of our time, his figure, tall, robust, square-shouldered, groups naturally, though much younger, with Diaz, Rousseau, and DuprC His productions affirm that landscape art was not buried when Corot died. FERDINAND HEILBUTH HIS artist was at first merely a colorist of costumes. It was at Rome he unveiled -*■ his unique talent for treating the life and manners of the pontifical court. This was done with such intelligent discrimination, subtle humor, and keen insight that Heilbuth entered at once upon a field of broadening renown. He was born in Ham¬ burg in 1826, but naturalized in France. He took his medals under the second class in 18^7-1859 and 1861; Legion of Honor, 1861; Officer of the same, 1881. He died in Paris in 1889. His “ Le Mont de Piete” is at the Luxembourg. He exhibited at the Royal Academy, London, in 1871, two pictures—‘‘Spring” and “On the Banks of the Seine”; also at Berlin, same year, “The Autumn of Love.” He was surnamed “the painter of cardinals,” so loyally did he render these cheery old gentlemen in red. Between the years 1852 and 1862 he oscillated between genre and historical themes, successfully sending to exhibitions those works which brought him marked successes: “Rubens Presents Brauwer to his Wife,” “The Son of Titian,” “Tasso at the Court of Ferrara,” “A Concert at a Cardinafs Home,” “The Pawn Shop,” “ The Promenade,” and “The Cardinal’s Antechamber.” Heilbuth forgetting his master, M. Comte, and surrendering himself without reserve to the world of impressions at Rome, has certainly created a style of his own. To those who were strangers to Heilbuth in 1855, it will be a surprise to learn that the artist of to-day, so robust and resonant, was at that period “a pale, thin dreamer under the falling autumn leaves.” He needed the sun of the south in his blood, and returning to Rome, caught for his inspiration the typical forms, brilliant contrasts, and picturesque tones of the Vatican, becoming its recognized painter. His “Monte Pincio,” with the clergy in their glowing robes and official dignities on the one side an,d the royal procession of the House of Savoy on the other, has not only great artistic value, but for those who, in the future, will seek to reconstruct the Rome of the pontiffs, before united Italy seized the city for its capital, it has the intrinsic weight of an historical document. In 1870 Heilbuth initiated a departure which may be said to have constituted for him a new style, if not his last incarnation. His life in England, where he spent two years, profoundly touched and swayed his spirit. He was open to fresh views, was accessible to the latest revelation. The beauty of English landscapes and of English women, the open air of their social high life, were the forces that now differentiated his career. The aristocracy were in turn captivated, and acclaimed him their fashion and fad. He painted a famous picture, “Repose after a Cricket Game,” owned by Sir Richard Wallace. In 1872 he returned to Paris, and, notwith¬ standing his wanderings, his tarrying in Rome, his English episode, came to be ranked as the artist of the Grand Monde Parisien. As a water-colorist he dates from 1864, and has poured out a mass of gems, full of grace and poetry. He was fond of the greensward, the entrance squares of chateaus, placing in his landscapes girls in fashionable summer toilets. He specially affected them in white or pearl- grey dresses, accented with black belt and long black gloves. About these he would fling the bloom of his atmospheres, finely toned with the virginal beauty of the costumes and the verdure of the fields. He has been termed “the Watteau of the century.” His study of “A Lady in Yellow” commands unstinted admiration. Heilbuth was prominent in founding the Society of French Aquarellists. DON GERMAN HERNANDEZ PUPIL of the San Fernando Academy, this Spanish artist has justified the prophecies of his kindred, and promises to rank high in the record of his future work. Although Mr. Stewart secured only “The Head of a Woman” from his easel, he bought with it a type of the best art executed in the Spain of .to-day. Every canon is conserved and made luminous — form, color, poise, and that other equation without which the body is but featured clay—the divine glow and pulse of life itself. This lovely face is a prelude to creations that must follow after, as day follows dawn. THEODOR HORSCHELT MARTIAL soul was encased in the body of Horschelt. For him art must lead 1 *■ to the camp life of the soldier and the tumult of battle. He was originally taught in the Munich Academy, and later by Hermann Auschutz, a famous martinet and drill-master in drawing. His first picture was of such virility as to find a pur¬ chaser in the Society of Arts at Munich—“The Wild Huntsman.” He studied horses in the royal stables at Stuttgart, and was a favorite with the reigning house. When he had barely passed his majority he visited Spain and Algiers ; in 1858 shared in the Russian expedition to the Caucasus, accompanying Alexander II. and Albert of Prussia in their inspection of the armies, returning to his home city, after five years of absence, by way of Moscow and St. Petersburg. This period of his career was filled with incessant labor, producing many pictures in oils and water colors. The siege of Strasbourg found him busy with sketch-book in the midst of stirring scenes. From the sources indicated, Horschelt put forth most effective canvases, having the zest of adventure and battle. His series of illustrations of “Chamois Hunting in the Bavarian Mountains ” has been engraved. In 1854, by royal request, he painted for the King of Wurtemberg “The Rest of Arabs in the Desert.” His “Arabian Horse” and “A Moorish Camp at Algiers” immediately followed. His later works reveal the march of untiring talent. The “Storming of the Entrenchments of Schamyl on Mount Gunib ” took the first medal at the exposition of 1867, through which he was made Chevalier of the Order of the Iron Crown of Austria. The Russian Emperor decorated him with the Orders of Stanislaus and Saint Anna. His “Morning in the Bedouin Camp” and “A Cavalry Attack ” are two water colors that have attracted attention. He was fond of freeing his humor in small pen-and-ink sketches, caricaturing in the mood of the famous “Cham” of Paris. Horschelt had the deep pleasure of finding in his art an outlet and unfolding of personal tastes and aspirations to the fullest limit of forceful, fiery utterance. LUDWIG KNAUS A CCEPTED by Germany as her greatest painter of genre and by the world as one of the chief representatives of that art, Professor Knaus has behind him a trail of honors. He was born at Wiesbaden in 1829 ; his father was an optician. He studied under Jacobi, and at the age of fifteen entered the Diisseldorf Academy, then dominated by Sohn and Schadow. He yielded chiefly to two influences in the formative period of his art : the old Dutch masters and the noblest leaders of the modern French school. He was never, in any pulse beat of his existence, a Diissel- dorfian. Member of the Academies of Berlin, Vienna, Munich, Amsterdam, Ant¬ werp, and Christiania ; Officer of the Legion of Honor ; Knight of the Order of Merit. Medaled at Paris, Berlin, Weimar, he has justified in his career every distinguished recognition. At the age of twenty he had nothing to learn in the mere manipulation of the brush; it only remained for him to perfect himself on lines of larger value. His has been a steady growth, each output from his hand revealing finer and riper fruit. His ambition did not take him above the common people in his choice of subjects. These he sought to know in an intimate, familiar fellowship and to portray their customs, joys, griefs, their life battle, whose only armor was very plain daily raiment, but whose breasts were shields behind which the conflicts of humanity were fought out. Knaus renounced idealistic, mythological compositions of his German brethren for the realities of this world. Wherever life was in its normal mould, untravestied, free of masks, without pomposities and parade, there was his atelier. He has decided fondness for the peasant in all his phases, his simplicity with its cunning, his naive self-regard when honored. All his works are significant utter¬ ances for the reason that they are so perfectly composed and, from the standpoint of the eye, exactly express the subject. He treats the events of current life with such wit, charm, pathos, loyalty, that everyone is delighted, understands, and will not forget. Edmond About, in 1855, writes : “1 do not know whether Herr Knaus has long nails, but even if they were as long as those of Mephistopheles it should still be said that he was an artist to his finger-ends. His pictures please the Sunday public, the Friday public, the critics, the bourgeoisie, and, it may be said, the painters too. The connoisseur is won by his knowledge and thorough ability; the most incompetent are attracted by his canvases because they tell pleasant anecdotes. Herr Knaus has capacity for satisfying every one. He has met his mission and filled it, winning a firm, sure place in the affections of the people and the highest coronation in art.” LOUIS EUGENE LAMI FRIEND of David, Gericault, Gerard, Girodet, and Prudhon needs no formal presentation. The man of such comradeship must have the artist full grown in his heart. Eugene Lami was equipped with every quality that enters into the personal adjustment of a strong painter to his sphere. He began at the beginning, and patiently drilled under the instruction of Corot, Horace Vernet, and the Ecole des Beaux Arts. He reached the Legion of Honor in 1837 ; was made Officer, 1862 ; medaled in 1865. His first laurels were won as a water colorist of scenes in fashion¬ able life. Historical representation had a firm fascination for him, and eventually took large grasp on his mind. When released as tutor to the Orleans princes, he gave himself to travel, visiting Italy, England, Belgium, everywhere alert for the realiza¬ tion of his ideals. In this wandering term he painted “ Charles 1 . Receiving a Rose on his Way to Prison,” “ A Combat in the Campaign of the Balkans,” “ A Rustic Team,” “Course and Clocher, Muscovite Bravery.” These were followed by more imposing examples, in which he exploits his passion for historic pieces. We have the “Com- % bat of Wattignies,” “Capitulation d'Anvers,” “The Battle of Alma,” “The Combat of Hondschoote ” (Museum of Lille). In all of the foregoing the landscape parts were painted by Jules Dupre. After the fall of Louis Philippe in 1848, Lami left France for England. He was accom¬ panied by the satirist Gavarni, whose influence over him may be traced in several of his later productions. Lami gave himself entirely to water color during his English residence, entering upon a series of works to illustrate the most luminous scenes in Shakespeare, Byron, and Goethe. This literary endeavor was a bold attempt to think the thoughts of these men of genius into forms and colors. He wedded his art to expressions which, in many instances, were incomparably finer than the original texts he illustrated. A marvelous water color, based on Shakespeare’s suggestion, reveals Cleo¬ patra, who, vanquished, receives the visit of Caesar. The artist has clearly shown in Caesar the Roman who spoke to the conquered Queen in these words : “Stand up ! Do not kneel down ; I beg you stand up! Stand up, Egypt!” Lami was often great in his composition, as instanced in the Huguenots showing the “ Bless¬ ing of the Poignards,” and, again, in the picture of young “Marie Stuart Forced to Listen to the Preaching of John Knox.” Another masterpiece is a scene from Sir Walter Scott’s “ Ivanhoe.” In char¬ acterizing an epoch of his own time, he fearlessly lashes the flanks of the nobility. “A Double Team of the Prince Demidoff” underscores the high life of 1836. His finesse in satire is here shown, and we understand why Gavarni found in Lami a friend. This portraiture of Demidoff, a lion of the kingdom of Louis Philippe, is a match for Zamacoi's’s canvas, the “Education of a Prince.” There is much to be said upon the scope and variety of Lami’s palette. To signalize a brief list gives a glance into his fecund brain : “ Bal de Tuileries,” “ Course a Chantilly,” “ Revue de Chasseurs,” “The Orgie,” “The Marble Stairs of Versailles,” “The Navy of Cher¬ bourg,” “The Baptism of Louis XIII.” He gave twelve studies to the chronicles of Charles IX., illumined the writings of De Musset, and illustrated with brilliant designs the Faust of Gounod. These were phrased with melodic motives, and uttered chastened passions through symphonies of color. WILHELM LEIBL SON of the conductor of music in the cathedral at Cologne, Leibl came to his 1 1 inheritance under helpful influences. He was born October 23, 1844. In his first years of manhood he strikingly resembled Courbet, both in physique and genre gravitations, having like faculty of eye and hand, while in traits of personal character he radically contrasted the flaming Frenchman, being reticent, self-contained, and exclusive in his choice of friends. His organization foreordained him to art. He is at his highest point of expression when treating the lowliest themes ; the simple- hearted maiden radiant in the freshness of rustic life, the old grandmother whose sweet face is webbed with wrinkles, and the peasant who strikes the earth daily to find his bread. There is a cynical clique who affect to find great art only in imposing subjects that bulk largely on the historic page or fly abroad in the spectacular involu¬ tions of classic composition, whereas there is no such thing as great or little art. judg¬ ing by such a standard. Art takes its significance from the treatment which a subject receives at the hands of the artist. There are great subjects, small subjects, but the art lies in the interior grasp and subtle skill of the painter. No man, after Professor Knaus, more explicitly illustrates this than Leibl. His masterpiece is in the collection before us; the subject, “Village Politicians.” These types balance him in a sphere with Francois Millet, in the fashion in which Holbein correlated Michel Angelo. A letter from the artist to Mr. W. H. Stewart fittingly falls into space here : Aibling in Oberbayern. My Dear Mr. Stewart : Permit me to earnestly request that you will lend me the picture, painted by me, entitled “Peasants” (“Village Politicians”), now in your possession, that I may exhibit it- in this year's great International Exhibition, which will be held in Berlin. For some years past various directors of art exhibi¬ tions have urged me to make some arrangement by which this picture, which is very little known in Germany, might be placed before the art-loving public. Because I felt, however, that this would perhaps occasion you some trouble, I have not ven¬ tured, in spite of earnest appeals, to approach you upon the subject. But now, at the request of the Berlin Academy of Fine Arts (of which, for some years, I have been a member), that I should exhibit my best picture in this year’s great interna¬ tional art show, I write to you for permission to use the “ Peasants,” which, I am convinced, is one of my very best works. I make this request in the hope that you will grant the wish of the Berlin Academy. The exhibition will naturally assume all responsibility for the safety of the picture, insuring the same. I will be under great obligations to you if you will grant this request. With expressions of respect, 1 remain, Your obedient servant, W. Leibl. February ii, 1896. CESARE MACCARI CHILD of Siena, where he was born in 1840, but in the real spirit of his life- 1 v work a son of Venice, is Maccari. He was a pupil in the academy of his native city, where he won the Prix de Rome, and subsequently studied in Florence under Luigi Mussini. At the close of his Roman curriculum he visited Assisi and Venice. The Venetian school powerfully impressed him, and dominated his art. He was first and last devoted to historic painting, giviijg such splendid results as to draw the eye of Victor Emmanuel, who commissioned him to decorate the ceiling of the royal chapel of the Sudario in Rome. He executed the “Triumph of the Three Graces ” in fresco for the Quirinal Palace, and for the mortuary chapel at Campo Verano, a lunette, “Tobias Burying the Dead.” Two works, “Melody” and “ Fabiola,” added much to his fame ; the latter belongs to Dupre, of Florence. In 1869 he was honored with gold medals in Siena and Parma; in 1876, in Philadelphia, at the Centennial, and Grand Prize in Turin in 1880. He is a member of the acad- emies in Rome, Genoa, Venice, and Bologna. He also wears the Order of the Italian Crown. His masterpiece is judged to be “The Descent from the Cross,” which, for composition, color, and breadth of handling, is one of the most reverent expositions of the tragedy of Golgotha. RAYMUNDO DE MADRAZO DYNASTY of Madrazos may be found in the art history of Spain, with laws 1 1 of hereditary sceptreship. For more than a hundred years the brush has passed from father to son. It has been the fancy of Eugene Montrosier to sketch in speech the original atelier of Madrazo the First. With a slight paraphrasing it follows : “I see the existence of this enthusiast of the unknown, this seeker of the golden fleece, wandering, as chance directed, with his knapsack on his back, supping on a crust of bread dipped in the brook, sleeping under the stars ‘in God’s inn,’ soothing his distress with a song or a kiss blown from the fingers’ ends of the senora leaning from her window, who blushes redder than the pink that is fastened in her black tresses. We would like to describe his rest at the turn of the road, the easel placed, the canvas taken from the box, the colors extracted from'the tubes, and the quick sketch made, expressing in a vivid manner the emotions felt. Then the happy chance encounter: a peasant going to town offers the dusty, tired pedestrian a place in his cart, and there is picturesque conversation or observations on things seen and appreciated differently, with warmth of words and eloquent gestures and a ripple of laughter like beads falling from a broken necklace. ” Jose de Madrazo had two sons—Federico and Luis ; Federico, in his turn, also had two sons—Raymundo and Ricardo. The subject of this monograph was born in Rome in 1841, and baptized in St. Peter’s. It is said that the priest of the parish initiated him into secrets of painting by allowing him to copy the pictures that were in the sacristy of the church. He received instruction from his father, who died in 1859, as the head of the Madrid Academy. He was also a pupil, in Paris, under Winterhalter, a notable exploiter in portraiture, genre, and history. While Ricardo Madrazo, his younger brother, has achieved a position quite his own, there is but one Madrazo who is recognized as the head of the succession in the family, and that upon logical premises established by himself. In 1878 he received for his work at the Salon a first-class medal and the ribbon of the Legion of Honor. Up to that date he had not appeared in any exhibition. He decorated the palace of the Queen of Spain in the Champs Elysees. “ M. de Madrazo is original because he does not pro¬ ceed like any of his predecessors, although he knows how to make good use of his ancestors. He speaks a new language that has a rhythm of its own, a spontaneous cadence, a generous flavor.” In spite of his residence there, and his intimacy with Fortuny, Rico, and Zamacoi's, he has never become a Parisian. He has the pleasing sensation of being claimed equally by France and Spain. Not unoften the dispute waxes hot, and his artistic indentity becomes the ground of combat. The voluble, flaunting banners that vex the air afford diversion, and beget no fear in the heart •• of Raymundo de Madrazo. He has permanently impressed his students, variously uttered his aims as a modernist of power, and charmingly invested his life in his friends. JEAN LOUIS ERNEST MEISSONIER HEN Eugene Montrosier said that all of Meissonier's art is summed up in the following observation, “intelligence and emotion enclosed in a panel the size of a hand,” he simply indulged in one of those cameos of speech of which the French are so fond, the passion for which sometimes leads them into a superficial estimate, * and a disposition to sneer at their more prosaic, but thorough Dutch neighbors. Meissonier could undoubtedly give to his smallest canvas the reach of leagues and the force of an epic, but his masterpieces were not panels “the size of a hand.” Nor was all of his art seen within such confined limitations of space. He was so various, so protean, his play of theme so wide, touching the king at one extreme and the bandit at the other, that he refuses to disclose himself save in the complete review and articulation of his whole career. Certain conditions seemed necessary to stir his ardor and arouse his gifts. He must have reality; after that, environment of a vivid kind ; form and color were prerequisites, then the com¬ position that threw those into action. He must have action, no matter what its impulse, motive, or end, whether the monarch in purple or the robber in rags ; there must be some guerdon at stake, some prize for the game. Meissonier’s idea of repose is a march between two battles, a breathing space by the fire, the story of the day's fight under telling, and valor for to-morrow’s fight, with hand on sword-hilt. Up to his date French art had reveled in many fields, and excelled in all except the school of the Dutch masters, whom Meissonier sought to rival. He has surpassed those in skill of detail, although he never became their peer in color. He was pronouncedly of the eighteenth rather than of the nine- teenth century. Without poetic temperament or large pretensions towards an ideal, he busied himself in projecting creations which, from thorough knowledge of the epoch he would represent, leads us to live with him in the splendors of the past. He would not have you understand that past by its materialism—costume, bric-ii- brac, architecture ; he goes beyond these, and reveals its very spirit and color. He never forgets his man in building his sphere around him ; he is the central motive that first strikes the eye and grasps the intelligence. To speak of Meissonier as a mere miniaturist, who can pack “fifty French guards, very lifelike and very stirring, on a canvas where two cockchafers would be too crowded,” is to judge his art by the canon of sheer manipulation ; it is to lose sight of the truthfulness and the soul which have dictated his careful execution. To one who saw and pondered the exhibition of his studies at the Petit Gallery at Paris, in the year following his death, the open page of his secret was read. It was simply conscientious, incessant toil. This series represented years of notation. These walls were filled with many searchings, perpetual efforts to seize vital factors in his themes. His horses were started, under his pencil, at the bone, and built up from fet¬ lock to head with layers of muscle and nerve finely fibred (for you saw the thorough¬ bred quality of his animal) and perfectly modeled. In this he was a close kinsman to the great Angelo Buonarroti, whose note-book, still to be seen in his house in Flor¬ ence, shows that he treated the human figure with the same scientific method ; hence the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel at Rome swarms with bodies full of vital fire. Albert Wolff, referring to Meissonier's studies when yet on the walls of his home, says: “We can there read the sincerity and wonderful determination of a man who leaves nothing to chance, who never loses sight of nature, and who makes no account of time when it behooves him to carry on a work to the pitch of perfec¬ tion which the artist desires. Drawings, painted sketches, statuettes in wax, have been prepared before the final undertaking ; it is the scale practice of this inimitable executant before he plays his piece. In this thorough way he has treated the epic of the first Empire in a great number of compositions, of which the most perfect, ‘ The Retreat from Russia in 1814,’ is not merely a masterpiece of composition and execu¬ tion, but, again, is a grand page of history in limited form.” Who can turn down that chapter, without a sense of its unutterable pathos ; while the man who “ met at last God’s thunder” sets the crushed face of his hope toward France? Montrosier well-nigh matches Meissonier in picturing the event in words : “In a hollow, broken-up road, furrowed with ruts and soaked with half-melted snow, Napoleon advances at a foot-pace on his white horse, followed by his staff. The generals are dejected and depressed, and dare not break the silence that has fallen on him who so often led them to success. They are marching under a dismal sky. As to Napoleon, he has the air of a Titan overwhelmed. Pale, with dim eyes, the mouth contorted with fever, he moves as one in a dream, letting the hand that holds his riding-whip hang down ; the legendary grey coat is wrapped around his febrile-shaken body, but seems too large ; under the crush that weighs him down he is lessened in size. His marshals follow him, tired out and humili¬ ated, in despair. Ney, however, shows a good front, but Berthier appears stupefied; the others drag along their fatigue and shame. One of them is sleeping in his saddle, rocked by the cadence of his animal’s step. In the distance a column fights in full retreat and is lost to view in the foggy horizon. Routed on every side, the route is strewn with bloody vestiges, the halting-places marked by corpses. But the spectator’s eyes leave the mass, to return to that figure of Napoleon with the convulsed mask, where all kinds of grief have placed their stigma ; to that colossus which a child’s hand could overthrow ; to the god of yesterday, crumbling to dust under the feet of destiny.” Meissonier first exhibited, in 1836, “The Little Messenger,” but attracted indif¬ ferent attention until 1840; then passed quickly into the-chamber of renown. He was made Chevalier of the Legion of Honor in 1846, an Officer in 1856, Member of the Institute in 1861, Commander of the Legion of Honor in 1867, Grand Officer in 1878. He died January 31, 1891. He stood alone in his place ; unyielding in his demands upon himself, he would not shift his convictions at the mandate of others. Severely reviewed, the centre of much tumult among the small populations that live beneath precedents and devoutly follow the leadings of some consecrated clique, he serenely held on his course. No dealer dared to tempt him ; the rich patron could not juggle with his judgment ; the wizard’s wand of gold, that has touched into servility so many artists, found him always erect and content. He painted only as his conscientiousness dictated. His house of life was sunlit, with broad verandas toward the south and wide eastern gables. One day Death passed by, going westward, and took him beyond the setting sun, through the portals of immortality. ADOLF FREDERIC ERDMANN MENZEL SERIES of pen-and-ink drawings called “Artist’s Pilgrimage” discovered 1 Menzel to the world. These were followed by a cycle of scenes lithographed from the history of Brandenburg. He illustrated Kugler’s “Frederick the Great” and the Edition de luxe of the king’s own works. These commissions opened his mind to the magnificence of that reign, and led him to the production of a succession of pictures disclosing its character. These were eminently realistic, combining exceed¬ ing skill in the treatment of details, with splendid coloration. Up to his fortieth year he had celebrated the glorified past of his country. His coronation picture set the seal to the series, which is more than a conventional review of ceremonies, the traditional handling of a court event, but a work of art in that intimate and august sense that gives to Menzel the dignity of a revelator. When he had signed that canvas he went out into the street to be thereafter the apostle of humanity, the friend of those masses who strive and cry, laugh and mourn under the palpitating strain of life. Coming to Paris, he was fascinated by Meissonier ; the feeling was mutual. He painted the portrait of the genreist. The intimacy settled into a permanent fellowship, and as Menzel could not speak a word of French nor Meissonier a word of German, the two formed an interesting pair to watch in the Salon and elsewhere. Their communications were in dramatic signs. Meissonier’s crisp, demonstrative staccato of speech and gesture was looked upon by his German comrade with perfect understanding and entire satisfaction. He has been professor since 1856, when he received the great gold medal of the Berlin Academy, of which he was constituted a member. Member also of the academies of Vienna and Munich and of the Societe Beige des Aquarellistes. He entered the Legion of Honor, Paris, 1867 ; the Order pour le Merite, 1870, and was knighted by the Bavarian Order of St. Michael. He was born at Breslau, December 8, 1815. In Paris his representations of contemporary life proclaimed him a pioneer there, as he had been in Germany. He was acclaimed with enthusiasm, one panegyrist asserting that “Menzel combined all the qualities of which other men of talent merely possessed fragments separately apportioned among them.” He was self-taught, tarrying but a brief time, in 1833, in the Academy of Berlin. He has stepped aside twice from his canvas to work in fresco. These passages of effort may be seen in the interiors of the churches of Innsbruck and Salzbourg. Emile Michel, in the Revue des Deux Mondes, December, 1877, records this word of praise: “ Above, vividly lighted, are white walls, pictures and altars resplendent with gilding ; then, by insensible degrees, the light decreases, candles burn in a mysterious and lukewarm shade, and below are some faithful ones, absorbed in their prayers, with an expression of silence and deep meditation. In place of the heavy pretentious¬ ness, which too often we have pointed out in the works of German painters, we find here a true artist, full of tact and taste, of elegance and easy grace, who would worthily sustain all comparisons with the best of our French masters.” GEZA VON MESZOLY HUNGARIAN landscape painter, who studied in Munich, but has transcended the 1 *■ old traditions of that school in his development, and was one of the results of the German Renaissance. He touches his work with pictorial charm, lucid warmth, and poetic fragrance. The scale of his production was not wide, but he moved within it in a calm, reposeful fashion. He took congenial and familiar scenes to shift them in the differentiated lights of the day or tones of the seasons. The shores of Platten Lake held his affectionate consideration. We see the “Fishermen’s Huts” there (in the Pesth Museum), the “Twilight Hour,” and “Lake Platten, with Fowls.” The “Water Carrier on the Banks of the Theiss” was painted in 1885. He was medaled at Munich, 1883. FRANCOIS PAOLO MICHETTI 1 IN the northern part of Italy, central between what were formerly papal states * and the shores of the Adriatic, lie three portions of what was once the kingdom of Naples, each of which bore the name of Abruzzo, collectively registered Abruzzi. It is a region seldom visited by tourists, although offering a wild, picturesque mass of mountains and forests, interluded with fat pastures, lakes, and torrent-like rivers. The natives of these highlands give their time chiefly to tending docks of sheep. During the winter season they descend into the plains ; a few at Christmas even stroll to Naples or as far as Rome to sing simple carols and pick up centesimi. This Italian nomadic life charmed the pencil of Signor Michetti, a Neapolitan artist of rare power, who has persistently scorned the merchandise side of art. Years ago we saw one of his earliest examples, called the “Young Shepherdess of the Abruzzi.” A child has fallen asleep on the grass by the forest’s edge, while a lamb gently pillows its head on her bosom, watching, as would a dog, with wistful solicitude over her safety. The sturdy figure of the sleeper was beautifully modeled, the attitude having the easy abandon of perfect repose. Both she and her keeper were thrown into bold relief by the contrasting screen of the woods, in the midst of which were visible other members of the fold, gazing in astonishment at the scene before them. Michetti was born at Chieti, near Naples, 1852, and studied under Dalbono, of that city, later in Paris and London. He has been medaled at Rome, Turin, Florence, and Parma, and is Chevalier of the Order of the Crown of Italy. His father was a day laborer, whom he lost in his youth. A gentleman of position became protector to the orphan boy and gave him advantages. In 1876 he returned to the neighbor¬ hood of his birthplace, and settled among the Abruzzi, in Francavilla, close to the Adriatic. Here he lived, surrounded by old pictures in the heart of the vigorous life of the Italian peasantry. In 1877 he painted his celebrated “Corpus Domini Pro¬ cession of Chieti,” a picture which is motleyesque in its discharge of color, a very tumult of boisterous rejoicing. The generic meaning of the artist’s name is defined here—“Michetti”: “splendid materials, dazzling flesh tones, conflicting hues set with intention beside each other.” Everything in this canvas bubbles with laughter— every tint of the prism, every face, every flower and fern spray ; above all, the genial sun. Now and then Michetti painted the sea. He was prone to take the meridian hour, when the sultry heat broods on the azure water, showing fishermen standing in it or on the shore, and gayly dressed women, with skirts caught up, searching for mussels; while, in the background, boats are seen with dreaming sails. The Spirit of the Tides sleeps, barely breathing in liquid murmurs that fall and faint against the gates of Capri. Again, the artist sends forth a moonrise over the bay or a flowering hillside on a summer evening, with children in the foreground. Whatever his theme, he is certain of his eve and hand, improvising with precision and dexterity ; a Guilleman before the vast organ of nature. H. HUMPHREY MOORE PRESENCE welcomed in the studios of Paris is that of Mr. Moore. He is an Tv American, born in New York City in 1844. Was first a student in the Ecole des Beaux Arts; afterward under Gerome in Paris, and Fortuny at Madrid. The dominating influence, however, was that of the Spanish rather than French school. He is a figure painter of more than average force. His variations of the subject of the Alhambra have found appreciative buyers. His better-known works are his “ Ahneh,” for which he received a medal at the Philadelphia Centennial ; Moorish Bazaar, “ The Blind Guitar Player,” and “The Moorish Merchant”; the type of this last is from Algiers. His “ Almeh ” shows consummate skill in composition. “The figure of the swaying and poised woman has the modesty of unconsciousness associated with gayety ; the abandon of delight in a voluptuous dance, without the expression or manner of one impure. The dance, or, rather, body-swaying of the ‘ Almeh,’ is located in one of the gorgeous halls of the Alhambra, frescoed in the intricate and dreamy harmony of Moresque decorations ; over the floor is spread a carpet rich in warm hues. The attitude of the girl leaves the body semi-nude, and while correct in point of costume, is contrived with consummate judgment for effect in color.” From the studio of Gerome he turned to that of Fortuny, who wielded the more powerful sceptre over his mind, giving to his work a dash and sparkle which were hitherto wanting. Subsequently he surrendered to the sway of Japanese art, in common with the leading impressionists of the time. His studies in shining reds and yellows have been highly priced on account of their exceeding popularity with American buyers. DOMENICO MORELLI BIBLICAL painter of unique personality was Domenico Morelli. He broke at 1 * the start with the reigning powers in that particular branch of Italian art, in the end attaining a mastery and founding a school of his own. He was quite the pattern for such headship : fiery, yet reserved ; haughty, independent, and radical. The young men deserted other teachers for his atelier, where he taught them loyalty to the radiant integrity of sun and sea. Among these was Paolo Michetti, whom he counted his prize pupil. Morelli was recognized when young, and sent by the Neapolitan government to Rome. He was placed under the tuition of Prof. Camillo Guerra, but was more influenced by Filippo Palizzi. During a second term at Rome he studied with Overbeck, concluding his preparatory monitions by an extended tour through the art centers of England, France, Germany, Belgium, and Holland. He won first prize at Naples in 1855, the gold medals at Paris in 1861 and 1867, and has been admitted to the Academy of St. Fernando, Madrid, of Fine Arts, Naples, and all the academies throughout Italy. He is Commander of the orders of St. Maurice and St. Lazarus, of the Crown of Italy, and is Cavalier of the Order of Civil Merit of Savoy. His more significant works are : “ Cesare Borgia at the Siege of Capua,” “Christian Martyrs” (in the Gallery of Capo di Monte), “The Assumption” (in the Royal Chapel at Naples), “Madonna and Child” (in the Church of Castellina), which has been most favorably criticised by Prof. Villari ; a “Christ,” painted for Verdi, the composer. At the Pans Exposition in 1878 he showed “The Temptation of St. Anthony,” gaining universal sympathy for the saint. His single panel of “A Woman Seated,” in Mr. Stewart’s group of pictures, is a marked note of clear expression. He was a friend of Fortuny’s, upon whose recommendation this drawing was purchased. GIUSEPPE DE NITTIS A NOBLE mission was that of Mr. William H. Stewart, who went into the realm ■** of unknown artists on tours of discovery. He had an eye for gifts in embryo, and, among others, may be said to have developed de Nittis, whose native place was the town of Barletta, several leagues distant from the battlefield of Cannes. The family was of Spanish origin, and settled in the Sicilies in the eighteenth century. They carried the name of Velasquez. Death took his father and mother when he was very young. At the age of twelve he came to Naples, and at sixteen produced landscapes directly inspired by Nature. His brother bought him a box of colors, those marvelous colors hidden in the white ray, which the prism unweaves. De Nittis gave a brief session to Professor Dattoli, another to the Neapolitan School of Fine Arts, and then swiftly returned to the breast of Nature. After two years of wandering he came back from the fields with a collection of sketches that imperi¬ ously took hold of the public and were discusssd in cafes and on street corners. Entering the Museum of Naples, the spell of the old masters fell like dew upon his brain. He tells us that it was from these and Nature in the neighborhood that he gained all his training. He came to Paris to eat the crusts of poverty, not knowing a verb in the language of the city. A fellow-countryman presented him to Brandon, who introduced him to Gerome, who introduced him to Meissonier. Doors were now opened to this predestined sorcerer. His dauntless, searching, sensitive spirit challenged the stiff posings of David and the classicists of his paternity. He took the people in the streets of Paris off their guard, and caught the crowds en route. The “Place des Pyramids” and the view of the “Pont Royal” are superb studies, illustrative of his method. These are exquisitely atmosphered ; the vibrating mist, the shifting, curling smoke, through which graceful figures appear and then vanish, show him as a veritable victor in confronting the subtle street phases of Parisian life. He rejoiced in the “ Bois ” and in the “Champs Elysees ” ; he was held by the masses that throbbed and surged between the Arc de Triomphe and the Obelisk. He loved the feathery blooms of the chestnuts, and the disks of delightful color let into the grass. Emile Blemont thus characterizes him : “ Impressionist in conception, de Nittis is a harmonist in execution ; the unity of the work comes from the unity of the idea. His compositions are as simple as the day and as complex as life. The sun awakens and accentuates the tones, warming and impregnating them with purple and gold, whilst the shadow, calming the brilliancy, softens the contrasts, absorbs the reflections, thus forming by its darker tones the bass of the symphony, vaguely lulling the dark blues and twilight violets of the outlines. And it is as true as it is charming. The effect corresponds exactly to the mathematical bearings of luminous vibrations, to the law of opalescent centers dividing the light into warm tints, which they transmit, and cold tints, that are reflected ; the law of complementary colors, mutually magnified by their opposition ; and the law of collateral colors, where the stronger decompose and partially absorb the feebler. Such an art as this is full of perils. What exactness of sight and delicacy of touch are necessary! But where the science of de Nittis might hesitate, his taste guides him surely; his style is always simple and large. It is certain that since the fifteenth cen¬ tury, art has known the charm of bluish shadows and tempered horizons ; but it is only lately that they have really understood and expressed how much there is of air and sky that is always mingled with terrestrial sights. To perfect and keep himself fresh, de Nittis spares neither time nor trouble. Vivacious, alert, of medium height and well built, the features finely cut, with an intense and slightly concentrated glance, the face remarkably mobile, brown hair and beard, with golden reflections, he is always in movement, always in quest of new fields and unknown sources. Inde¬ fatigable, he paints with ardor streets and woods, landscapes of grass and landscapes of stone, wheat-fields, racecourses, earth and water, the Parisian drawing-room toilets and the lone dreariness of a ragged old woman on the banks of the Thames. In an enormous box, with compartments and grooves, he keeps numberless sketches of all sorts. One of the most curious is a study of the sky, done in less than an hour in answer to a challenge of Gerome and Boulanger. In the infinite azure floats, like white fleece, some wandering vapor; there is nothing else, and the effect is prodi¬ gious. It is Shelley’s cloud transposed ; the painter has modeled the impalpable. As he varies his subjects so he varies his processes. “ It was quite late when he specially devoted himself to drawing, but the really great passion of de Nittis is the pastel. If he loses the intense transparency of oil colors, he gains a wonderful rapidity of execution, outlines drawn and colored at a stroke, tones deliciously modeled, and shadows of a strange softness ; he gains that marvelously misty envelopment that yields the golden'dust of a sun’s ray, the velvet of a ripe fruit, the down of flowering carnations, the haze of the horizon's air, dif¬ fused light, atmosphere, and perspective. His chef-d’oeuvre in this style is the portrait of a woman exhibited in 1882. He passed through impressionism without lingering or losing himself, only keeping a flower of white light with a bit of thread fallen from the scarf of Iris.” He was medaled in Paris—third class, 1876 ; first class, 1878 ; Legion of Honor in the same year. His “ Road from Naples to Brindisi ” was the chief centre of interest for the Salon of 1872. Of this M. Montaignac thoughtfully says: “An evolution was going on ; painters were trying to free themselves from black and from bitumen ; there was a marked tendency toward the sun—a real sun—not made by black or white ; de Nittis’s ‘ Brindisi Road ’ appeared. The picture was at the same time a proof and a lesson ; it showed to what point the power of color could be carried without turning things black ; it taught the process to those who were seeking for it. De Nittis died at St. Germain in 1884. Gerome, Meissonier, Manet, were the masters whom he welcomed last. While they undoubtedly had a share in the artistic moulding of his individuality, there came a time when but feeble trace of them could be discerned. The maturing soul of the painter had caught higher visions, and was unrestful until these came down to dwell with him. ALFRED PARSONS HEART familiar with the sun beats in the breast of Mr. Alfred Parsons, coloring his art and his life with a golden hue touched with crimson. Mr. Henry James calls him “the painter of happy England,” and further exploits his style as one easily ministering to the “ quietest complacency ” of that self-centred nation. He says Mr. Parsons is “doubtless clever enough to paint rawness when he must, but he has an irrepressible sense of ripeness. Half the ripeness of England, half the religion, one might almost say, is in its gardens; they are truly pious foundations.” Recall Mr. Alfred Austin’s book on “The Garden that I Love,” the original of which spreads its beauty round the Dower-house of Goddington in Kent. Mr. Parsons has shown us the English passion for dowers, as a protest against the greyness of their climate. He has looked over many walls, gone with observing leisure down many alleyways of hawthorn and boxwood, and caught the fragrant swing of their organized revels of color. Here is one picture for the verbal setting of which we are indebted to Mr. James : “A corner of an old, tumbled-up place in Wiltshire, where many things have come and gone, represents that moment of transition in which contrast is so vivid as reflections on the intrigues and whole effect of the play, design with rigorous exact- ness the costumes of the actors in their least details, indicating the colors and the shades. He exhibited in the Salon of 1870 “ Sancho Recounting his Exploits to the Duchess”; in 1872, “Autumn”; in 1873, “Matrimonial Accord”; in 1875, “Market at Antwerp” and “Old Clothes”; in 1876, “The Morning Interview, Intemperance and Sobriety.” GEORGE JOHN PINWELL N engraver on wood for illustrated books was the original sphere of this artist. He advanced to water-color themes, and at once solicited the consideration of connoisseurs. He was elected an Associate of the Society of Water Colors in 1869, contributing frequently to the exhibitions in Dudley Gallery up to 1871, when he was made a full member, but frail health restrained him from activity after that date. His “Pied Piper of Hamelin,” “The Elixir of Love,” “The Saracen Maiden,” and “The Strolling Player” are his most important examples. There was an atmosphere of pathos in his work. His appeal was to the thoughtful rather than to those who seek qualities of art only on the surface. Pinwell repaid the study of underlying history. He was born in London in 1842, and passed to rest in 1875. His works are rarely seen to-day outside of collections. ROMAN RIBERA PUPIL of Lorenzalez, Ribera was caught in the influences that were set in play by 1 v the honest effort of Spain to free herself from conventionalisms, and to look at the world with eyes cleared of mists and untwisted by the strabismus of conse¬ crated precedent. His “Cafe Chantant ” reveals the grasp and brush-work of a master with a tine certainty of characterization. Contemporary life affords Ribera his field. He received honorable mention at the Paris Exposition, 1878, and the gold medal at Barcelona ten years later. He is Fellow of the Royal Academy of Art, Knight of the Order of Isabella, and of the Order of Christo of Portugal. MARTIN RICO GUITAR and a generous bundle of cigarettes could take Rico round the globe. 1 * He came to his first knowledge of art through the kindness of a cavalry captain, who taught him to draw. From the trooper he passed to the Madrid Academy, and, as he progressed, made his living by engraving on wood in moments of leisure. With a few jingling coins in his pocket, he would take long excursions through the country, getting upon friendly terms with herdsmen or gypsies, reducing expenses to the minimum, and not unfrequently having to beg his way back to the city. In 1862 he secured the first Prix de Rome ever given at Madrid for landscape. The four years’ pension carried the privilege of a choice between Rome and Paris. Rico went to Paris. ZamacoTs introduced him to Daubigny and Meissonier. When his pensionate had expired he was fortunate in finding that prince of patrons, the father of Mr. Julius L. Stewart, the artist, who gave him advancement until, well on his feet, he could march single-file. He was susceptible to the delicate moods of Nature, her restful interludes, her deeps of still skies unvexed by tempests, even undreamed of clouds. His spirit was steeped in light and toned with color. Mr. John C. Van Dyke, in the Art Review of December, 1887, says of him : “Entirely different from Rousseau, he did not paint the strong, enduring, storm-tossed trees of the centuries, but rather the soft, delicate foliage of early summer swayed by the slightest breeze or hanging motionless in the heated air. The world of nature seems to have been a sort of dreamland to Rico, for his art was flooded with a ‘rapture of repose’ that steals over the sunlit streets,, the silent water, the nodding trees, and the distant hills. This was his point of view, and when men like Rico put their impressions on canvas, conveying it to others by technical skill, it is rightly called art.” He was the intimate comrade of Fortuny, and was with him in Italy for a longer time than any other friend. His pictures of this period are Fortunesque ; indeed several of his sea pieces, especially those of the Venetian canals and tfie Bay of Fonta- rabia, might have been painted by the distinguished Catalonian himself. In others he appears more serene and harmonious than the latter. Richard Muther deems his execution more powerful; “less marked by spirited stippling, his light gains in intensity and atmospheric refinement what it loses in mocking caprices.” Certain market scenes, with a dense crowd of buyers and sellers, are peculiarly spirited, rapid sketches, with a gleaming charm of colors. In 1878 he was medaled at the Salon and endowed with the Cross of the Legion of Honor. In the days of his opulence he does not forget his struggles and the narrow margins of his boyhood, maintaining very simple habits. He travels widely and far for fresh things, and, whether in water colors or oils, so brilliantly speaks as to command the praise of the people and the franchise of the rich. He was personally precious to Fortuny. ANTON ROMAKO HIS whole-hearted genre painter was born at Atzgersdorf, not far from Vienna, in 1 183s. He was a pupil of the Vienna Academy and of Rahl, and subsequently resided in Rome. His Italian figure-work is of first rank. He made a permanent success in rendering the child-life of Vienna, and is strongly akin to Knaus in the verity and spirit of his compositions. Medals, 1869 and 1872; Legion of Honor, 1882. His pen-and-ink sketches are of a high order. For him the aim of art was not beauty, but the expression of truth. C. BARONESS DE ROTHSCHILD DISTINGUISHED artist in a family of renown, who paints for her pleasure and 1 v that of her friends. She is a member of the Societe de Aquarellistes in Paris, and occasionally exhibits, as instanced by the two effective landscapes shown in London in 1875. Her status carries the strength of a professional, although she ranks as an amateur, being unwilling to sell her pictures. The canvas to be seen in this collection was a_gift by the artist to a charitable fair held in Paris, and was purchased there by Mr. Stewart. THEODORE ROUSSEAU HERE is one name in the annals of modern French art that must give a thrill of 1 joy and a consciousness of assured satisfaction whenever it is written, whether the pen be in the hand of a venerable savant like Albert Wolff, or the merest tyro who takes art for a tonic. The name is the caption of this unworthy monograph. Who has not felt the futility of words in the presence of a great creation ? A cliff at sea, whose ledges hew out of the pitiless bulk and green gloom of great billows ; passionate hearts “ white as snow and tenderer than lilies”; a peak cleaving the air, an eyrie for mountain eagles, and an altar for worship; a sunset trembling on the sky like “a harvest kingdom of red wheat”; an oak by Rousseau, whose roots grip the ribs of earth, whose body gives greeting alike to sun-floods or storms; a Titan unbent by the tread of a thousand years. This artist was the supreme intellectual painter of France, an aspirant for knowledge until the black fog of death dimmed his brain. A glimpse of his method has been given us by M. Alfred Sensier in his book, “Souvenirs sur Theodore Rousseau.” “ I went to see him in Indian summer in November. His little house was cov¬ ered with clematis and nasturtiums. He showed me a whole collection of pictures, sketches, monotint studies, and compositions ‘laid in,’ which made him ready for twenty years’ work. He was beginning his beautiful landscape, ‘The Charcoal Burn¬ er’s Hut,’ so luminous and so limpid. He had laid it in with the right general effect at the first painting on a canvas prepared in grey tints, and after having placed his masses of trees and the lines of his landscape, he was taking up, with the delicacy of a miniaturist, the sky and the trunks of the trees, scraping with a palette knife to half the depth of the painting and retouching the masses with imperceptible subtlety. ‘ It seems to you that I am only caressing my picture, does it not ? That I am putting nothing on it but magnetic flourishes ? I am trying to proceed like the work of nature itself, by accretions which, brought together or united, become forces, transpar¬ ent atmospheric effects, into which I put afterward definite accents as upon a woof of neutral value. These accents are to painting what melody is to harmonic bass, and they determine everything, either victory or defeat. The method is of slight impor¬ tance in these moments when the end is in sight ; you may make use of anything, even diabolical conjurings,’ he said to me, laughingly, ‘and when there is need of it I use a scraper, my thumb, a piece of cuttlebone, or even my brush-handles. They are hard trials, these last moments of the day’s work, and 1 often come from them worn out, but never discouraged.’ Then stopping short in his talk, ‘ Come, let us go for a walk ; I will show you a little of the law of growth in nature itself.’ ” Rousseau had plunged into nature’s centre. His landscapes are laid down on a world the anatomy of which was familiar to him. He is the majestic prophet of solitude, of vast plains and forests, a revealer of moss-grown rocks, in the midst of which he sets his gigantic trees. His favorite was the oak, the primeval wide- branched oak, such as stands in one of his masterpieces—“A Pond.” Plants, trees, and rocks were not forms summarily observed and clumped together in an arbitrary fashion ; for him they were beings gifted with a soul, breathing creatures, each one of which had its physiognomy, its individuality, its part to play, and its distinction of being in the great whole of universal nature. He tells us : “By the harmony of air and light, with that of which they are the life and the illumination, 1 will make you hear the trees moaning beneath the north winds, and the birds calling to their young.” He has the attitude of Turgenieff's “Sportsman ” toward Nature. Man receives neither love nor hatred at her hands. She looks beyond him with her deep, earnest eyes, because he is an object of complete indifference to her. “The last of thy brothers might vanish off the earth, and not a needle of the pine tree tremble.” While this is the philosophical posture of Rous¬ seau’s mind, no man has informed nature with deeper moods, reflecting the spirit of the child, whom God has placed before her. In fact, the greatest picture he ever painted lets forth this accordant note. It is called “ Le Givre,” and is the crown jewel in that marvelous grouping of gems known as the “Walters Collection.” What Turner’s “ Slave Ship ” was to the realm of marine art, Rousseau’s “ Le Givre ” is to the realm of landscape. The earth is ridged as from the spasms of an old agony, the grass turned to a hoary green beneath the withering frost; the forest-masses of the back¬ ground stand at arms while the day dies. Everywhere one reads the shadowy footmarks of sorrows that have journeyed that way, going down into the valley and beyond the hills, pilgrims to a dreaded destiny. There is a tragic memory in the sunset. This canvas is the bitter epic of a soul whom want and the world’s scorn were seeking to drive to despair. But the world and want reckoned without knowledge of the man whose patient courage will fight as long as his dust holds together. It is a perpetual satire on Paris that “ Le Givre ” was carried all day through the streets of the city by Dupre, who failed to find a purchaser, and sold it in the late evening to Baroilhet, the singer, for five hundred francs ; who, counting out the sum, said with a sigh, “Paintings will be my ruin in the end”! What changes were wrought by the time Edmond About, in his notes on the artists of the Salon of 1857, wrote these words : “ Theodore Rousseau has been for twenty-five years the first apostle of truth in landscape. He made a breach in the wall of the historic school, which had lost I the habit of regarding nature and servilely copied the bad copyists of Poissin. This audacious innovator opened an enormous door by which many others have followed him. He emancipated the landscape painters as Moses formerly liberated the Hebrews in exitu Israel de /Egypto. He led them into a land of promise, where the trees had leaves, where the rivers were liquid, where the men and animals were not of wood. On the return of this truant school the young landscapists forced the entrance of the Salon, and it was still Theodore Rousseau who broke down the door. In that time Rousseau occupied the first rank in landscape—above all, as a colorist ; but neither the institute nor the public wished to confess it. His uncontestable talent was contested by all the world. It is only to-day that his reputation is made.” Thirty years have gone since this panegyric was penned, and these years have proved that not a single sentence was overcharged with praise. He was born in Paris, 1812. Pupil of Guillon-Lethiere, whose lessons he soon forgot. Chevalier of the Legion of Honor. His adversaries pursued him to the last, and wounded him sorely by neglect and intrigues. The slight put upon him, though chief of the section of the jury at the Universal Exposition of 1867, in his failure to receive the rosette of the Legion, hurt him keenly. In the distribution of official recompenses others were preferred.. Among the fragments of letters found at his death was the draft of a protest to the. Emperor, which was never sent ; he had torn it asunder and thrown it aside, too proud to make the appeal for justice. A few years after his mar¬ riage his wife was seized by madness, and though his friends besought him to put her away in some retreat, he would never consent. Whilst he tended her he became the victim of a brain affection which clouded his end. In 1867, when Rousseau lay dying, a parrot screamed, and his demented wife danced and trilled. He was buried in front of the forests he loved at Barbizon. His friend Millet set up a memorial for. him, a simple cross carved upon an unhewn block of sandstone, with tablet of brass engraved “ Theodore Rousseau, Peintre FERDINAND ROYBET H E has the right to rival the old Spanish masters on account of the glowing tone with which he has invested his cavaliers of the seventeenth century. Roybet conserves the identity of the historical, but does not sacrifice his pictorial art to it. He has given an accomplished translation of the aspects of the period in which he revels. He was born at Uzes, 1840. Studied at the School of Arts at Lyons. Settled in Paris, 1864. He sent the “Jester of Henry III.” to the Paris Salon of 1866, for which he was medaled. He knew how to give environment to his great people, a skill in which the French have pronounced mastership. He presents his superb cavaliers and their ladies, grouped with vivid power within picturesque incidents and surroundings. The formal is charged with vitality, the ceremonious is shaped into plastic expression ; hence we have movement and the delight of life. He would not paint unattractive histories ; his accurate sense of events and their bearings must needs have the allurement of fascinating episodes. To the large circle to whom he speaks he has proved himself brilliant, original, and sincere. We know that an exhibition of his collected works in Paris, 1890, was the occasion of an enthusiasm which has been rarely aroused by any display in that city of the productions of a single hand. JAMES SANT HE “principal painter in ordinary to Her Majesty” is the title which is worn by 1 James Sant. The honor is well bestowed. He was born in London, 1820. A pupil of Varley, who prepared him for the Royal Academy, which he entered at the age of twenty years. Shortly thereafter he found his sphere in the painting of por¬ traits. Among his earlier efforts we have “Samuel,” 1853 ; “ Children of the Wood,” 1854 ; “ The First Sense of Sorrow,” which led to his election as an Associate of the Royal Academy in 1862. Among his circle of sitters we find the Due d’Aumale ; the Lord Bishop of London, whom he painted in 1865 ; the Queen and the children of the Prince of Wales, 1872. His “Young Whittington” was shown at the Cen¬ tennial, Philadelphia, 1876; “The Early Post” and “Adversity” at Paris, 1878. Referring to “The Early Post,” the Art Journal, July, 1875, gives unqualified praise : “Mr. Sant has given us everything in this painting—youth, beauty, life, sympathy, a charming story, and a very pleasant reminiscence of an English country house with¬ out our ever having been there. As an example of careful art-work and purity of tone in coloring, this composition of itself is excellent, but as an incident of everyday life depicted on canvas it is one of the best pictures of the Academy.” WILLIAM SMALL N English landscape painter residing in London, whose artistic qualities have 1 1 made him for years a most reliable contributor to the Royal Academy. What¬ ever he undertook, the result was a picture. It is not a fragmentary effort to catch some transient phase of nature, not an exhibition showing the presence of some clique or school in art, but a whole story from the great book, a beautiful rehearsal of some single song or chapter out of the heart of the world. He demonstrates a well- balanced unity, regard for eminent leaders in landscape, and has caught connections concerning the body of things about him that assert his own right to rank among the best exponents in modern English art. He is a Member of the Institute of Painters in Water Colors. He has gained the patronage of a loyal constituency, who steadily purchase his pictures. He has shown “The Fallen Monarch,” “Early Spring,” and “The Harvest Field” in water color. In oils, through recent years, he has exhibited “After the Storm,” “Highland Harvest House.” To the Paris Exposition in 1878 he sent “The Wreck,” in oil, and “The Beech-Trees” and “Poplars,” in water color. The Art Journal of July, 1876, ventures to speak of “The Wreck” as a “noble speci¬ men of grandly painted seascape, certainly one of the masterpieces of the year.” There is a marked influence of Constable on his finest examples. ALFRED STEVENS CONJUNCTION of a Belgian and a Frenchman is seen in' the massive, broad- shouldered man who stands before us. Perhaps the Belgian strain is the more strongly current in his blood, but of this the critics are not sure ; where these are in doubt let angels fear to tread. Alfred Stevens represents health and color in art. His healthfulness is not so intrusive as to be ill bred, for no man has surpassed him in rendering pictures at once solid and refined, graceful and even. He carries a dexterous brush in a large deft hand, and produces what men love to linger over, with a finished style, an elegant execution, and sincere poetic sentiment. His patron¬ age has been powerful from the beginning ; honors have come to him with growing significance. He has been medaled in Brussels and Paris, third, second, and first classes ; Member of the Legion, in which he attained Commander’s place in 1878. Austria, Bavaria, the museums of France, Belgium, Germany, and England give prominent recognition to his name. Born at Brussels, 1828. JULIUS L. STEWART PARISIAN from Philadelphia is the characterization that has been made of this 1 1 gifted artist and cultured gentleman. He reversed the course of Mr. Humphrey Moore, who went from Gerome to Fortuny. Mr. Stewart went from the atelier of Zamaco'is, Fortuny’s pupil, to that of Gerome. His antecedents fitted him for the broadest training, his father, one of the most renowned of modern collectors, giving every advantage to his son. The leading critic of the continent has said : “The earlier original works of Julius Stewart were as brilliant, as colorful, and spirited as if they had come from an easel native to Spain or Italy, but with his advancing powers and his wider social range in Paris his style assumed a more subtle and elegant form ; he occupies to-day a unique place as the painter par excellence of modern social life in the gay city.” His “Five O'Clock Tea” was one of the most refined pictures of the Paris Exposition of 1889. “The Hunt Ball” (“After the Hunt”) won him fame on both sides of the sea. It is now owned by the Hon. Franklin Murphy, of Newark. Mr. Stewart is distinctly a modernist, giving serious weight to every fresh movement in the kingdom of art, ready to discern values in any school that reveals firmer, closer hold on the verities of life and the truths of nature. His advance has been toned by the reflected lights of Gerome, Madrazo, Zamaco'is, while at his belt he wears the key which he alone has forged, which he alone can turn. Mr. Stewart received honorable mention in the Paris Salon of 188s ; Member of International Jury, Paris Universal Exposition, 1889 (hors concours) ; medal, Salon, 1890; gold medal, Berlin, 1891 ; Knight of the Order of Leopold of Belgium, 1894 ; Knight of the Legion of Honor, 1895 ; grand gold medal, Berlin, 1896 ; gold medal, Munich, 1897 ; Member of Jury of Selection for World’s Columbian Exposition, where, in consideration of this honor, he did not compete. In 1895 his “View of Venice ” was bought by the German Emperor. CONSTANT TROYON HE mastership of Troyon lay in his breadth of technique, harmony of com- 1 position, and an intuitive, direct seizure of nature at first hand. It would be a flippant and useless travesty on the man to trace him back to the days when he painted porcelains at Sevres. He came to the unfolding of his potential self in com¬ munion with souls kindred to his own : Theodore Rousseau and Jules Dupre. He was a landscape painter of finished power before his visit to Belgium and Holland, which turned his attention to animal life. Those who have been privileged to study the features of his genius as a landscapist will ever be grateful that he graduated there first. The example in the collection of Mr. Quincy Shaw, of Boston, is quite the highest expression of his ability—a noble, strong handling of surfaces that impress the beholder as having been laid upon foundations of granite. The tree-forms are magnificently built up and buttressed. They recall the sturdy standing of Rem¬ brandt's oaks—as though they were living personalities conquering under the sweep of the north wind and the flails of tempests. In fact, it was Rembrandt, rather than Paul Potter or Albert Cuyp, who set a broader vital impulse stirring in his blood. In 18s9 Troyon painted the picture in the Louvre which displays him at the meridian of his power. “Till then,” says Muther, “no animal painter had rendered with such combined strength and actuality the long, heavy gait, the philosophical indifference, and the quiet resignation of cattle ; the poetry of autumnal light and the mist of morning, rising from the earth and veiling the whole land with grey, silvery hues. The deeply furrowed, smoking field makes an undulating ascent, so that one seems to be looking at the horizon over the broad face of the earth. A primitive Homeric feeling rests over it. What places Troyon far above the old painters is his fundamental power as a landscapist, a power unequaled except in Rousseau. His ‘Cow Scratching Herself’ and his ‘Return to the Farm’ will be counted amongst the most forceful animal pictures of all ages.” It was in 1847 that he astonished the Salon with a cattle piece so strong in color and of such vivid realism that he established his fame at a stroke. His art is penetrated with poetry, the rustic poetry of out-of-doors on a clear-minded day ; a poetry that sweeps with its vision the fields, the herds, the dogs, the Keeper, the grass, flowers, every flame-like spire and leaf in the woods ; wnile arching all is the great sky, like a vast chalice of sapphire overturned, from the rim of which foaming clouds slowly drop and drift. Troyon sent sixty masterpieces to the Salon between the years 1823 and 1865. In this last year a shadow fell on his easel, and death turned a renowned career into a renowned memory. Mr. William Henry Howe (himself a strong painter of animals), in “Modern French Masters,” has this estimate, which is an up-to-date type of intelligent regard and differentiation touching Troyon : “Potter, as an animal painter, was never the equal of Troyon. He could paint isolated objects with harsh truth, but he never could gain the whole, the ensemble of things, as com¬ pared with Troyon. He could paint cowhides and cow anatomy, but he never could paint cow life. Albert Cuyp could give the truth of a cow's skeleton, the rack of bones and members, with exceptional force, but Troyon, in painting cows—the clumsy, wet-nosed, heavy-breathing bovine—was vastly his superior. Again, Land¬ seer could humanize dogs and other animals, giving them a sentiment quite opposite 1 to their nature, but Troyon never distorted or sentimentalized in any such way. He told the truth. It has been said that he was the most sympathetic painter of this century. It may be added that in the painting of animals and their homes he was the greatest painter of this or any other century.” Hamerton’s “Contemporary French Painters” gives a kindred estimate: “In the ‘Oxen Going to Work' we have a page of rustic description as good as anything in literature—of fresh and misty morning air, of rough, illimitable land, of mighty oxen marching slowly to their toil ! Who that has seen these creatures work can be indif¬ ferent to the steadfast grandeur of their nature ? They have no petulance, no hurry, no nervous excitability ; but they will bear the yoke upon their necks and the thongs about their horns, and push forward without flinching from sunrise until dusk.” He was ever seeking new themes, and greeted with delight any variation from the average body-colors of his friends on the turf. Upon one occasion he was saluted with mocking hilarity in the midst of neighbors, when he tied up to paint a cow of magnificent tawny tone. She was an animal, in their judgment, of but little value. “This gentleman,” they said, “has chosen to represent in his picture the only worthless creature there is in the whole pasture. Why, she is being fattened for the butcher! ” How suggestive “the point of view” becomes under the light of this incident. Troyon saw rare color and splendid form. The farmers saw only a poor milk-giver. Each from his own logical outlook was right. Troyon never married, devoting him¬ self to his mother and his art. She established, as a memorial of her son, “The Troyon Prize” for students in animal life. His massive frame, dissolved in dust, lies in the old historic Montmarte Cemetery of Paris, but surely he is with Rousseau. JOSEPH HENRI FRANCOIS VAN LERIUS DORN at Boom, near Antwerp, 1823; passed outward, 1876. A noble teacher of the art he finely illustrated. He was early inclined to his professional career. Studied in the Academy of Brussels, where his rapid development astonished the masters. He was sent, at the expense of his native village, to the academy at Antwerp, entering at the age of fifteen. Here he took all prizes, and so captured the interest of the president, Baron Wappers, that he took him into his own studio as an assistant. His first picture was a scene from Sir Walter Scott’s “ Kenilworth an interview between “Leicester and Amy Robsart.” This was followed by “Milton Dictating Paradise Lost to his Daughter.” In 1848 he exhibited at the Brussels Exposition a picture for which he was awarded the gold medal. “Joan of Arc ” was shown in i860, the year of his appointment as Professor of Painting in Antwerp Museum. The incident on which the work was based is said to have occurred when La Pucelle was in command of the army at the siege of Paris. The tradition is, that upon going the rounds of the camp, as was her custom, she came upon soldiers carousing with followers of the army. Her indignation was so great that she delivered a blow of menace on the air with such violence that the miraculous sword, which had been sent her from Fiertoes, was broken in two. The dramatic pose of Joan’s figure is as superb as the attitudes of the men and women are abject and affrighted. For this work Van Lerius was medaled with gold in Amsterdam, and elected to an honorary membership in the Academy. At the International Exposition at Munich in 1869 he exhibited a dramatic work representing a maiden plunging headlong from her chamber window to escape dishonor. Among his later efforts were “The First- Born,” bought by Queen Victoria ; “ Volupte et Denouement.” purchased by Prince Saxe-Coburg of Gotha. In 1877 the city of Antwerp bought the “Lady Godiva.” EMILE VAN MARCKE T T IS father had been a pupil of Watelet, and was favorably known in Germany as a -*■ -*• landscape painter. His mother, who was French, was an artist of flowers, receiving a medal at the yearly salon where she exhibited. Emile was their only son. It was at the Liege drawing school that he took up his first studies. Here he carried off all the prizes, but was restrained from vanity by the thorough counsels of his father and mother. He married early the daughter of M. L. Robert, for a long period connected with the Sevres manufactory, and who, at the death of Regnault, became chief director. Here he secured a position for his son-in-law, who seriously began upon his work of decorating on glazes, and followed it for nine years. He executed landscapes relieved by animal forms. Several large-sized pieces on pttle iendre were offered as gifts to sovereigns ; those presented to the Queen of Holland were of unusual beauty. Troyon, whose mother lived at Sevres, visited her frequently, and was attracted to Van Marcke, to whom he offered instruction. The relation became confidential, and to the young artist the realization of his ambition. His first canvas was a success, but the critics, instead of seeing Van Marcke in it, saw Troyon. For many years this proved a limitation on him in the judgment of the public. The formula was very simple through which he was compromised and was disbarred from his rightful estate. Those who liked his painting (and they were numerous) could find no better compliment to offer him than to say : “ It is worthy of Troyon.” Those who desired to underrate his work, whilst, however, recognizing his incontestable qualities, said : “Without doubt it is good, but it is only a reflection, and I prefer the original.” When Troyon died in 1865, the art critics proffered sympathy to Van Marcke, who, having no longer his accustomed counselor, would be much embarrassed. As usual, the critics were wrong ; the exact reverse resulted, and the artist achieved his personality. Normandy was his chosen sketching ground, where he purchased a farm and successfully speculated in raising herds of fat cattle. He painted these as lost in endless content, gravely chewing the cud of comfort, standing hoof-deep in lush grasses under the quietude of wide-spreading heavens. He placed his animals away from the reach of distempered weather, enclosing them in atmospheres so serene as to give a heavy dewfall to pasture lands. He died in 1891, and left no successor. His career was a splendid culmination. 7 'he greatest success recorded for such an event was in the sale of his effects. An increasing appreciation marks his work. DANIEL VIERGE URRABIETA r I ''HE art of illustration is that graphic representation which “sets forth in a clear manner those aspects of scenes and incidents that no verbal discription, how¬ ever elaborate, can give.” While the art is ancient, its evolution and application may be said to be modern—and ours by right of conquest. As the pioneer of that victory stands Vierge, who has been called the “father of modern illustration.” He has stood unrivaled for a quarter of a century, and every stroke of his stylus is considered the production of a master. Gustave Flaubert compares the man of genius to a powerful horse tortured by the cruel spur and bit of routine, who, nevertheless, forges forward, bearing along with him his reluctant rider—humanity. Vierge has been the witness of his own apotheosis and the development of his art to the point of picturing living people in living attitudes, rendering through the simple media of black and white the very atmosphere and even hues of color. August F. Jaccaci has well defined his peculiar trend and preeminent gift : “ Vierge is a realist in that he is a worshiper of truth ; but realist is a mislead¬ ing epithet, embracing as many sins as virtues. Far from the low realism of the com¬ monplace and nastiness is that realism of Vierge which beautifies all that it feeds upon, because it delights in dwelling on those elements of beauty and goodness exist¬ ing latent or revealed in all things. Perhaps the most personal, and thus the most strongly felt, trait of Vierge is his faculty of imparting a sort of heroic character—all his own—to his representations of reality. It seems as if there is more of the Moor than of the Spaniard in his nature, as if his work was a revelation of that fine race that knows how to drape itself in a rag, and on whose lips the honey of beautiful verses is born of a ray of sunlight. But his art is as naturally alert as it is dignified.” Under a stroke of paralysis that smote his right side, he has been compelled to teach his left hand the craft of its brother. This slow process has at last resulted in satisfactory skill. He is not more than in life’s prime, and gives pledge of deepen¬ ing the fountains of his inspiration. The field for the gifted illustrator is contem¬ poraneous with every phase and fact of life. The craving of the multitude is not for such knowledge of events as comes from a serious study of their rise and evolu¬ tion, a philosophical searching into the root-bed of historic growths ; but a swift comprehension of the speech and deeds of mankind pictorially presented ; a brilliant summary of the chapters humanity writes under the daily goings of the sun. The man who leads the art of illustration in these primal expressions must take large space on the horizon of the future. ANTOINE VOLLON HEN the Professor of Art History in the University of Breslau was asked his " ’ judgment of Vollon, he made reply : “The greatest painter of still life in the century." Again, Vollon has been termed “the painter’s painter,” so richly defined, so preciously pedantic is this artist. He was born in 1833 at Lyons, and is a pupil of Ribot. He was at first rejected by the Salon, but with unfailing courage knocked again and again against the clamps of professional stupidity. These were broken in 1865, when he was awarded a medal. In 1868 and 1869 came other medals ; in 1878 one of the first class. It was in this year that the officership of the Legion of Honor fell to him. A study of two fish won the red ribbon ; this picture was purchased by the government, and is in the Luxem¬ bourg. In 1897 he was elected a Member of the Institute of France. He has founded a school of painting in which still life is raised to the dignity of history. The acces¬ sories to his themes are as finely handled as the propositions. “He paints dead salt¬ water fish like Abraham Van Beyeren ; grapes and crystal goblets like Davids de Heem, dead game like Frans Snyders.” He is the master in the representation of freshly gathered flowers, crisp vegetables, copper kettles, weapons, and suits of armor. With breadth of treatment he obtains equally power of realization. Vollon amazed everybody at the Salon of 1876 with a single life-sized female figure, “A Fisher Girl of Dieppe,” painted with exceeding power. In 1877 he appeared again in a new phase. Instead of pots, kettles, old armor, or jeweled glass filled with half-transparent fruits, he treats a landscape subject. It is a dreary reach of country, with long sweep of road, extending afar into the hori¬ zon, upon which a horseman is galloping ; a few houses at the side, giving human touch to the expanse. The chief values are found in the sky, where squadrons of clouds are scurrying before a furious wind, tumbling and torn. The blast, that whips the flying vapors, twists at the traveler’s cloak, who, with bent head, seeks to gain his goal. It is a weird, impressive canvas, all the more so because a distinct departure from the path the artist is accustomed to tread. To be so versatile carries a temptation to superficiality, to which artists have not unfrequently yielded. Vollon never is less than perfect in the patient technique with which he unfolds and accents his theme. OTTO WEBER A GERMAN artist, whose rank is in the class with the Bonheurs. He was born at Berlin, and killed in the Franco-Prussian war of 1870. In his native city he was under Steffeck, and in Paris a pupil of the great Couture. For a number of years his studio was in Milan. His medals cante in the years 1864 and 1869. The range of his subjects was wide ; in each example he manifested an equal faculty for successful treat¬ ment. It is unusual to find a Teutonic artist who can quickly adjust his canvas to such marked variations of expression. His “Ox Team,” “The Deer Quarry,” “ F£te in Brittany,” and “The Haygathering” show plastic power in an unusual degree. Whether handling figures or landscapes, he was equally happy. Two of his pictures are in the Luxembourg. Some years ago he exhibited in London, Suffolk Street Gallery* a work which firmly settled his grasp upon English regard. The scene represented Bavarian peasants bringing their cattle down from the mountains. In ease of manipulation, living postures, keen accuracy, supreme excel¬ lence of landscape, ranging from green valleys to mountain-peaks covered with snow, it was an example worthy of Troyon. EDUARDO ZAMACOiS DAWN suddenly fading on the forehead of heaven ; a summer-tide swiftly stemmed and frozen; a warrior, with his combat just fairly on, stricken down; a singer, his voice shattered into silence, while the sweeter half of the strain is yet in his soul. Thus Death lost to us Regnault, Fortuny, and Zamacoi's. He was born at Bilboa in 1840; was trained in Paris under Meissonier; entered the Salon in 1863, when he startled the art public with the brilliancy of a meteor. He was medaled in 1867. His first picture was the “ Enlisting of Cervantes.” In 1864 he set forth the “Conscripts in Spain” ; in 1866, “ The Entrance of the Toreros” (painted in part by Vibert); in 1870, his remarkable canvas, “ The Education of a Prince.” Eugene Benson’s monograph upon Zamacois carries the force of dramatic fervor: “Zamacois, with a manner almost as perfect as Meissonier’s, is a satirist ; he is a man of wit. 1 should suggest the form and substance of his works as a painter by saying that he has done what Browning did as a poet when he wrote the ‘ Soliloquy of the Spanish Cloister. ’ . . . It is manifest that Zamacois admires Moliere; that he appreciates the picturesque side of Victor Hugo’s genius. Zamacois does with form and color what Tennyson does with words—that is to say, he combines them in a studied and jeweled style, to express his pleasure in intense and brilliant things. But he has wit, and no one would accuse Tennyson of that Gallic trait. Therefore, to make you acquainted with Zamacois, 1 must say he has a suspicion of malice that must be delightful to the compatriots of Voltaire ; that he is bold and positive in his conceptions and tine and elaborate in his expressions. “His color was pure and intense, his style finished and tine. It was not enough for him to make his point, but he must also make it as perfectly and completely as he possibly could. Like Moliere, with whose genius that of Zamacoi's displays a decided affinity, the effect of the artist’s work was always allied with and supported by the extremest elegance of execution. He was fond of daring experiments of color, and his pictures were a perpetual amazement and delight to artists more timid and less original, who acknowledged in the fiery young genius from Bilboa one worthy to take his place among those masters whom Paris was proud to call her own, irrespective of their birth or blood. When the war-cloud burst over France, Zamacois stood with his future in his grasp and the shadow of doom upon him. After the wreck was cleared, when French art numbered its dead, there was to be supplemented to those who had perished upon the field of battle the Spaniard who had become a Parisian, and who, flying before the blasts of battle, had succumbed to the mortal malady which had prevented his serving with his. brethren in the ranks.” Under date of January 30, 1871, at Granada, Fortuny sends this message to Mr. W. H. Stewart : “I wish to write to you of the death of Zamacois, but I was so full of sorrow that my courage failed. I cannot yet believe that I shall never see him again, and it will be hard to fill his place in my remembrance.” Mr. Stewart, writing to Baron Davillier, says : “I heard of Mariano Fortuny for the first time in January, 1868, through Eduardo Zamacoi's, the much lamented and talented artist, who died at Madrid January 1 2, 1871, at the early age of twenty-nine.” It was this brilliant artist who attended Mr. Stewart on his tour to Rome, that he might, in propria persona , present him to Fortuny. To symbol the art of Zamacois one must find an ancient Damascus blade of tempered steel with the sinister blue gleam on its edge, the hilt set with blood rubies. Wesley Reid Davis. CATALOGUE RAISONNE CATALOGUE FIRST NIGHT'S SALE THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 3d, 1898, AT CHICKERING HALL BEGINNING AT 8:15 O’CLOCK BELLANGE (Joseph Louis Hippolyte) 1800-1866 No. I Military Sketches /) CnJL // k-^> ■'VO 'Ll* Pen-and-ink sketches, group of military officers. Signed at the right. A squad of cavalry charging, an old man, and a Height, 9 inches; length, 12 inches. GREGORY (Edward John) No. 2 The War in the East 8 -0 0 (1-1 t 6 * Cr £ u Drawing An episode of the war in the East. The scene is dramatic, and represents a field hospital where a wounded soldier has been brought for treatment. He lies on a litter over which bends a doctor of the Red Cross service, while several comrades hold the unfortunate so that the physician can better make his diagnosis. To the right stands a soldier with a water jug. Signed at the left. Height, 9 inches ; length, 12 inches. PILLE ( (Henri) No. 3 Lansquenets Pen and Ink This is a clever drawing by the able Frenchman, in his familiar manner and of a subject he delighted to work out. It represents a parade of famous, or infamous, foot soldiers of the sixteenth or seventeenth century, marching through Paris. The abandon and the swaggering air of these rapscallions are well expressed, and to the interest of the historical fact there is the dexterous use of the medium that has made the artist famous. Height, 13^ inches ; width, 83 ^ inches. Signed at the left. Dated 1869. SMALL (William) No. 4 A Plowing Match Drawing An original black-and-white drawing in body color. The scene is locally English and represents a bout between farmers at the furrows. In the foreground is a plowman with a team of three horses, and on the hillside others are dis¬ tributed. Groups of spectators watch the contest, and over all is a sky, gray and lowering. Height, 143^ inches ; length, 21 inches. Signed at the right. FORTUNY (Mariano) 1838-1874 No. 5 Corpus Christ! A study in brown for a composition. Two figures in the center hold up a crucifix. Two drummers follow. In front the Monks carry lighted tapers. A line of buildings is behind and on a sign is displayed “Cafe de Las Caseras.” An interesting incident connected with the above study is mentioned in the monograph on Fortuny. Height, 15 inches ; length, 23^ inches. Signed at the right. Dated 1869. y/y Pol yy $uu)[ l i< 'Ity HARPIGNIES (Henri) No. 6 Autumn. Castle of San Angelo Water Color A dainty little landscape study by the famous master. The fall tints are happily suggested, and the remodeled mausoleum stands out in bold lelief against a warm, glowing sky, with some softly suggested trees. Height, 6 ^ inches ; length, 9 inches. Signed at the left. Dated 1864- CHAM A / % (Comte Amedee de Nod) 1819-1879 No. 7 The Commune * Water Color Interesting sketch of some Paris characters, somewhat more serious than was usual with the famous Parisian caricaturist, so well known under the Third Empire. The two ragpickers are cleverly indicated and the color is just. Originals by this artist are rarely seen in this country. Height, y)/z inches ; width, 8 inches. Signed at the left. CLAYS (Paul Jean) No. 8 On the Coast Water Color Characteristic scene on the Holland coast. Some heavy, stolid Dutch luggers with sails of red and yellow are in the center, while to the right is a lighthouse, to the left some rowboats. Over all is a gray sky with bits of light here and there. Height, 13X inches ; width, inches. Jj 0 • ^ * Signed at the right. Dated 1865. MENZEL (Adolf Frederic Erdmann) No. 9 The Stirrup Cup Water Color A delightful and thoroughly characteristic picture by the famous German master. It portrays two horsemen in coats of mail stopping before an inn, drink¬ ing from a big cup. They are on their steeds, beneath the shadow of a large tree ; and at the window of the inn, a woman and child sit looking at them. The men have all the heartiness and swashbuckle air of their time and the expression on their faces is remarkably well painted. The face of the trooper to the right of the picture is a study, being worked up to a high degree of finish, while the painting of the horses and the mail is no less able. The composition is interesting and the technique is astonishing in its detail, without the sacrifice of any of the larger qualities that go to the making of an important work. Height, 8}4 inches; length, 12 inches. Signed at the right. Dated 1875. FORTUNY (Mariano) 1838-1874 No. 10 £ d' fSb ■? £-/ lOsyi.ctlCJ J Study of Flowers Water Color A careful study from nature in the artist’s masterly and highly searched manner. Some poppies with the long stalks and leaves, drawn on gray paper in body color. Height, 10 inches ; width, 8 % inches. Seal at the left. HEILBUTH (Ferdinand) No. U Monte Pincio Water Color The scene is laid in the famous gardens of the Pincian Hills. In the distance Rome stretches out and St. Peter’s is seen vaguely in the hazy light. Two cardinals in the center of the composition are meeting on the terrace and gravely bowing to each other with courtly elegance, their servants standing in groups behind them. Although the picture is small, it is treated with great simplicity and breadth and the color scheme is one of pleasing delicacy. Height, 7 % inches ; length, \ 2]4 inches. Signed at the right. RICO (Martin) No. \2 Venetian Canal with View of Veronese’s Tomb A familiar view of the well-known monument, rising up behind some houses in sunlight ; a bridge is to the right and a gondola and a group of trees to the left. In the right center there is a rowboat containing two men and a woman. The sky is blue with a suspicion of hazy, white clouds. Much detail is shown throughout the panel. Signed at the left. Height, inches; length, inches. ALMA-TADEMA (Laurenz) 0 6 y No. J3 Roman Youth Reading Horace Upon a long marble seat covered with skins and cushions, a young Roman sits reading a book. He is robed in white and purple, while the sunlight from the blue sky above him flecks the edge of his robe and sends some of its brilliancy on the stone floor, the rest of the figure and accessories being in cool shadow. There is the artist’s usual skillful rendering of marble and textures, with much expression to the man’s face, upon which plays a look of pleasant interest. Height, ^ itii-'npQ • Ipntrth n 1/ inches. Signed at the left. Dated 1882. RIBERA (Roman) No. 14 Cafe Chantant A wonderfully clever piece of character painting. On the stage of a pro¬ vincial concert hall a singer, dressed as a soldier, is performing his act. Beneath him are seen the orchestra and a few of the audience, each face and figure being a careful study from life. The backs of a man and a woman to the right are very expressive. A drummer, a violinist, and a flute player, are all worked up to almost photographic detail, and yet withal the panel is broadly treated. Signed at the right. Dated 1876. Height, 9 % inches ; length, 12^ inches. * BOLDINI (Giovanni) w No. 15 River Seine at Mont-Valerian A beautiful glimpse of the attractive French river under an effect of early sum¬ mer, with tender greens and the sparkle of sunlight. The city stretches off to the right, some trees and a pleasure garden are to the left, and in the immediate fore¬ ground are a few boats, in one of which is a woman. Other boats dot the river here and there, and ducks are swimming about. The sky is beautifully painted, and the detail, though microscopic, is carried out broadly enough to avoid any feeling of dryness. Height, 8}4 inches; width, 6 % inches. Signed at the left. Dated 1877. FORTUNY (Mariano) 1838-1874 No. \6 The Arquebusler The charm of Fortuny’s amazing technique is nowhere more apparent than in this famous panel of a single figure of an old soldier who stands leaning on his rest or croc with one hand, while on his shoulder is the arquebus, the quaint, clumsy gun of the middle ages. He is also armed with a big sword. The soldier is dressed in the astonishing garb of the period. He wears a doublet of green, knee breeches of red velvet, blue stockings, and a steel breast-plate, the incongruity of which is emphasized by the exquisite fidelity of the painting, a wonderful piece of realism. The man-at-arms has a head fit for strategy and crime ; his rumpled hair and frowsy face betoken a dangerous foe. Height, 9>4 inches ; width, 6 ^ inches. Signed at the left. Dated 1871. MOORE (H. Humphrey) No. \1 Banks of a River Mr. Moore has painted here a delightful little characteristically Japanese land¬ scape, intensely decorative and thoroughly realistic. The branches of a graceful tree curl and twist curiously across the front and top of the picture, while on the other side of the stream which crosses the panel is the flowering bank of a beautifully cultivated garden full of delicate color, with here and there some pagodas or sculpture. Height, inches ; width, inches. Signed at the left. BONVIN (L£on) 1834-1866 NO ' ,S /. ■ No. 57 Pond at Meaux Water Color The tower and walls of a church form the background of the composition; here and there are tree forms that come up against the sky. In the foreground some boys sit beside a pond, which reflects the bank and the green growing on its edge. An extremely interesting variety of greens, and the arrangement is picturesque. There are also effective notes of color in the old walls of the distant buildings. % / Height, 12 inches; length, 19 inches. Signed at the left. BOLDINI (Giovanni) No. 58 Clichy Square, Paris A view of the famous square in Paris, seen under a characteristic cloud-filled sky. To the left the statue of “ Marshal Moncey and the Dying Soldier ” stands out, while the streets are full of action and the bustle of the French capital. The stages, drays, flower-women, and denizens of the quarter are all true to life. On the walls are the familiar signs of the different tradespeople. It is truly a glimpse of the center of the Quartier Clichy. Height, 23^ inches; length, 38 inches. Signed at the left. Dated 1874. COOSEMANS (Joseph Theodore) No. 59 Winter Landscape This is an interesting composition, giving the view of a road vanishing off in perspective under the effect of a heavy foil of snow. To the right is a grove of trees on a high bank; to the left a hedge and a house, some other habitations stretch¬ ing off in the distance. There is a fine feeling of the season, with crisp atmosphere, delightful drawing of bare trees and landscape forms. While the color is soft and harmonious, the canvas is full of rare bits of attractive painting that make it exception¬ ally interesting. Height, 22 inches ; length, 34 inches. Signed at the left. Dated 1868. MICHETTI (Francesco Paola) j?. fa &>**&*■ No. 60 The Turkey Girl On a hillside, in the springtime, a young Italian girl leans against a deco¬ rative, blossoming tree, and with a face full of vague yearning looks out of the picture. Turkeys are about her ; one is perched on a tree, and a large one, with outspread wings, is in the foreground. A flowering branch is near her, and all through the canvas there is a consciousness of spring that gives out a feeling of soft, balmy odors and growing vegetation. The painting is full of delicate color of a highly decorative sort, such as this artist delights in, together with a cap¬ tivating cleverness of brushwork. It is Italian from the figure of the pretty girl to the deep blue of sky, the brilliancy of greens, and the pink of the blossoms. Signed at the left. Dated 1876. Height, 25 inches ; length, 35 inches. FORTUNY (Mariano) 1838-1874 No. 6i Court of Justice, Alhambra In a courtyard at the Alhambra, looking back into a beautiful interior, some prisoners are stretched out, their arms manacled and their feet in stocks. A dusky sentinel, clad in a white robe and red burnous, armed with warlike weapons, squats, I in brilliant, shimmering sunshine, on guard over his prisoners. In the center back¬ ground sits a figure on an Oriental rug, and farther in the background and shadow of the alcoves are other figures, while a distant window opens on the delicate greens of a garden. In the foreground, surrounded by a decorative tile border, is a circular fountain, filled with limpid water. To the right are some birds, and two gorgeous saddles and trappings on wooden stands. Cool shadows on the white marble contrast with the brilliant streak of sunshine, which is fairly dazzling in its inten¬ sity as it strikes the right of the picture. The drawing and painting of the intricate traceries and carvings, the hanging lamps, and the gay ornamentation of the Moorish interior are all wonderfully expressed and ably painted. As an architectural study it is delightful, for it has the truths of perspective and construction interpreted through a genuinely artistic temperament. Height, 30 inches ; width, 23^ inches. Signed at the left. Dated 1871* HEILBUTH (Ferdinand) No. 62 Lady in Yellow Figure of a young woman seated on a divan. She is dressed in yellow, and has a dog in her lap. About her neck is a ruff, and on her head a blue velvet hat with a white feather. The figure is charmingly posed, the light falling on one side of her head, the rest of which is in shadow. The sweet face is dignified and tender in its well-bred expression, and the painting is executed with rare grace and delicacy. Height, 36^ inches; width, 21^ inches. Signed at the left. A > u. dvr- BONNAT (L6on Joseph Florentin) No. 63 Neapolitan Peasants at the Farnese Palace This is an unusually interesting and important example of one of the rare, moderate-sized easel pictures by the distinguished Frenchman, and which was one of the successes of the Salon of 1866. A crowd of picturesque Italian country people are arranged along the stone base of one side of the palace, under a great iron-barred window. Lying fast asleep, a dark-skinned, sturdy young man in a blue cloak is stretched at full length ; by his feet are a copper kettle and some clothes in a bundle. Three women in white waists and head-dresses are to the right, their faces full of expression and painted in delightful detail. To the left an old woman sleeps and a young man and girl lean against a post. On the stone pavement at their feet is a beautifully painted figure of a handsome little boy, fast asleep, his head on his arm and one hand at his face. Nothing could be more dexterously executed than the painting of this lad, clad in a jumble of garments, but with a feeling of his form beneath. The sense of youth is conveyed in every brush-mark. Height, 23^ inches ; length, 39^ inches. Signed at the left. Dated 1865. y J / * n- fd - i / J VOLLON (Antoine) No* 64 Crystal Bowl and Fruit A still-life painting of a large crystal bowl standing on a table, which is draped with a red velvet cloth. There are some green and black grapes with two pears, all of which are executed with the artist’s usual ease and freedom of paint¬ ing, being swept in, in certain strokes, with great richness and depth. Height, 25 y z inches ; length, 36^ inches. Signed at the right. ROYBET (Ferdinand Victor Leon) J ur- No. 65 The Kitchen in the Castle This picture depicts a scene from the middle ages wherein my lord’s men of the kitchen are preparing the repast for the goodly company upstairs. Five serving- men are seen, two of whom are preparing a deer for the spit ; another is plucking a fowl and talking to a great greyhound ; still another stands over the fire, while the last is bringing in another animal on his shoulders. The work is realistically executed and full of character. Height, 28^ inches • length, 38 inches. Signed at the left. DUPRAY (Henri Louis) d ,0 K f, pt * i Ut t l No. 66 Waterloo A French cavalry charge is depicted, the composition being filled with horse¬ men in excited action. In the left foreground are a number of dead English and French soldiers mingled with horses. Behind, a general on a white horse is charging forward, and beside him may be seen a detached group of combatants of both armies. The picture gives a fine idea of the horror of battle, and throughout there is much spirited movement, with fine suggestions of great masses of troops. Height, 31^ inches ; length, 47^ inches. Signed at the right. /afas 4bJtVer cz ' S’’ / 6 * . ■is'LCCsC '1/P-&C-J DUEZ S~0 0 (Ernest Ange) No. 67 The Pont Neuf, Paris A glimpse of old Paris. The view is from the well-known bridge. Many important structures showing architectural detail form the background. Strongly silhouetted against an evening sky is seen the statue of Henry IV. In the fore¬ ground, along the river bank, is a line of bath-houses. A bateau mouche on the river and omnibuses passing over the bridge give action and interest to the composition. Height, 25^ inches ; length, 32 inches. Signed at the left. Dated 1884. FORTUNY 1 * (Mariano) 1838-1874 <7 $ /r* No. 68 Courtyard, Alhambra A vigorous study of old Spanish buildings and a courtyard. The walls of the buildings are strongly illuminated by the sun, and a laurel tree in blossom rises above the red-tiled roofing. In the foreground are two pigs rooting in the soft earth, while to the left of the composition are a number of chickens. Two women and a child are spreading clothes in the background. A sky of intense blue is broken by gray-white clouds. Height, 43 ]/ 2 inches ; width, 34 y 2 inches. Seal at the left. BAUDRY J CO * ft / A ^ ./) / -rn,