/L/3> DELINEATIONS OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/delineationsgrapOOstor Frvm an- e^em/ten uttteSeuih 7>ana}b6 . DELINEATIONS, GRAPHICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE, OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY, IN THE WEST RIDING OF THE COUNTY OF YORK. BY J. & H. S. STORER. WITH HISTORICAL NOTICES. LONDON: PUBLISHED BY LONGMAN, REES, AND CO., AND C. TILT; T. STEVENSON, CAMBRIDGE; AND E. LANGDALE, RIPON. LIST OF PLATES. Frontispiece — The Tower. riate i. i ne /iDDey, irom Anna, ooyiens iseat. TT 11. Hiast v lew. TTT 111. 1 lie L.aa.y ^napei. TV IV. k ne v^noir diiu rNdvej irom me x^dsi vv inoow. V . Trio PV>rwir> i ne ^noir. VT VI. Entrance to the Tower. VTT Vll. Tin M„, m 1 ne in ave. VIII. mi 1 . tt The Chapter-House. IX. South Transept and Tower. X. The Refectory. XI. The Quadrangular Court. XII. The Cloister. XIII. The Abbey, from the S.W. XIV. Corbels, &c. XV. Ground-Plan, &c. Vignette — Costume of a Cistercian Monk. Do. Entrance to the Abbey-Grounds. To Mrs. Lawrence, Of Studley- Royal, In the County of York. Madam, These Delineations of the splendid Domain, which owes much of its remaining beauty and interest to your pre- serving hand, are ( with permission ) gratefully dedicated to you ; with our ardent wishes that your presence may perpetuate the indulgence afforded to the numerous and admiring visitants of Fountains' Abbey ; and that you viii may long continue to possess the serene delight of conferring the blessings of your affluence on all around you. We have the honour to subscribe ourselves, Madam, Your obliged and obedient Servants, J. H. S. Storer. Cambridge. PREFACE. The vestiges of Fountains' Abbey are universally allowed to be the most perfect and picturesque that now exist in the kingdom ; and every attention which art can bestow is exerted to enhance the natural beauties of the place ; so that, while the fabric itself exhibits the mouldering ruins of a once magnificent pile, erected in a far distant age, the grounds are decorated and preserved in all the elegance of modern refine- ment. These delightful associations of nature and of art have long been duly appreciated ; and the continual resort of nobility and fashion to these charming scenes gives ample testimony to the estimation in which they are held. Not- withstanding these superior claims, it may be asserted correctly that no adequate representation of this splendid ruin, nor any particular description has hitherto been attempted. We find, indeed, that the able and elegant writer of the History of Craven, at one time, intended to present to the world the history and description of this Abbey, but, with X regret, found it expedient to confine himself to brief remarks ; and among the numerous illustrative works which have lately- appeared, Fountains' Abbey, if noticed at all, has only been regarded with passing attention ; its history likewise is almost confined to the large folios of Dugdale, and of Burton, and Farrar's more portable but no less interesting account. The present publication is intended to consolidate every well- authenticated fact relative to the Monastery and its Abbots, with an accurate description, and numerous representations of the structure in its present state, collected, not in the hasty manner of a desultory tourist, but noted on the spot, and delineated from well-studied points of view, during a con- tinued residence in the vicinity. The materials for the history of the Monastery, after the period to which Dugdale's well-known work brings it down, are very scanty, and "are not to be found in a collected form in any public or private repository. Incidental notices, gleaned from numerous sources, therefore necessarily compose the basis of much that is presented to the reader. These have been interwoven with what is known of the lives of the respective Abbots, and thus is the biographical appearance of the work accounted for. HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY, 8fc. In attempting to sketch the history of this celebrated Monas- tery, it may not be inappropriate to advert previously to the origin of the monastic orders, and succinctly to trace the progress of such of them as are more immediately connected with the subject of these pages. The steps by which they attained their power, and the influence of that power on the most important interests of the governments under which they flourished, though but incidentally displayed as in a work like the present, furnish ample matter of contem- plation at once to the theologian and the statesman. Bellarmine, the grand advocate of Monachism, asserts that it was shadowed in the law of nature, more distinctly expressed under the Mosaic dispensation, but brought to perfection in the time of the Apostles. 3 But that the whole course of life should be spent in solitude, in unnatural self-inflicted pain, and in a renunciation a Soames's History of the Reformation, vol. ii. p. 53. B •) HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. of every allowable enjoyment besides that which springs from direct devotional exercises, are positions at variance with the constitution of human nature, and have no warrant from either the injunctions or examples of our divine Master and his inspired followers. The interchange of social duties with occasional retirement, has ever been found to tend most to the completeness of the Christian life. The origin of Monastic communities has been ascribed to the shock which the piety of many Christians received soon after the secular establishment of the faith under Constantine, from witnessing the dissipation of their hypo- critical and luke-warm brethren. 13 This would have led us to look for the rise of monachism at once around the pomp and luxury of the imperial city. But its origin was not derived from thence : It was in Egypt, and in the latter part of the Third Century, that the monastic life first began to claim the distinction of immaculate piety . c Bingham ascribes the beginning of the monastic orders to Paul of Thebes, who is called by St. Jerome the author, — and to Antony, who is denominated by the same father, the improver of this course of life. These and their dis- ciples are said, first from necessity, in the Decian persecution, and afterwards from choice, to have followed the eremitical profession. To Pachomius is attributed the erection of the b Lingard's History of the Anglo-Saxon Church, p. ] 02. c " The Egyptians were by nature disposed to bear austerities and mortification, and fit to become monks." — Jortin's Remarks on Ecclesiastical History, vol. iii. p. 34. PROGRESS OF MONACHISM, A.D. 340. 3 first monastery, which was in Egypt, and in A.D. 325. Hila- rion, a scholar of Antony, introduced about the same time the system into Palestine and Syria. Eustathius, Bishop of Sebastia, brought it into the regions of Armenia, Paphlagonia, and Pontus. As to Europe, however, its introduction was not so early ; for Baronius owns that there were no monas- teries in Italy till A.D. 340. Martin, Bishop of Tours, set the example in Gaul in the latter end of the fourth century ; and thence this institution might probably find its way to our country/ We may believe that amongst the early monks were very many instances both of the worst and of the best of men. " Amongst them," says Chrysostom, " you may behold the life of angels." Amongst them, say their own admirers, both in their early institution and two centuries after, not to mention the voracity for the marvellous, which some even of their most learned and unexceptionable patrons stimulated and promoted to a pernicious height, 6 you might find men pretending to madness, walking upon their hands and their feet, and blemishing the religion they professed by the most extravagant and disgusting feats of pretended perfec- tion. In proceeding with our sketch, we need but allude briefly to the circumstance that monachism had established itself in the British Church previously to the arrival of Augustine, d Bingham's Antiquities of the Christian Church, book vii. chap. 1. sect. 4. c Jortin's Remarks on Ecclesiastical History, vol iii. pp. 18, 40. 4 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. the Roman missionary. His companion, Paulinus, restored Christianity in the kingdom of Northumbria, and re-erected the see of York, A.D. 625. The first Monastery known to have been erected in York- shire was that of Lastingham, near Kirkby Moorside, about thirty miles N. E. of York. This was in the year A.D. 648/ The second was founded at Tadcaster, Newton Kyme, or Aberford, in A.D. 655. g This religious house, wherever it was, (for its exact situation cannot easily be decided) probably fell a prey to the Danes about A.D. 866. The third was the famous Abbey of Whitby, — founded A.D. 657, by Oswy, King of the Northumbrians, for Monks of the Benedictine Order. 11 The fourth was at Gilling, near Richmond, — founded somewhat before A.D. 659. 1 The fifth was at Ripon, — founded A.D. 661, by Eata, Abbot of Melrose, the monks of which were for a time dis- placed on account of their adherence to the oriental manner of calculating Easter. Five other Monasteries were established in this county previously to the Conquest, — only one of which attained to celebrity ; viz. — that of Beverley, founded about A.D. 700. f Lastingham was re-founded in the reign of William the Conqueror. The monks afterwards removed to near the walls of York, and there erected St. Mary's Abbey. — Dugdale's Monast. Angl. vol. i. pp. 62, 384. g Burton's Monast. Eborac. pp. 54, 85. h lb. p. G8. 1 lb. pp. 54, 86. ENGLISH MONASTERIES, A.D. 1066. 5 Till the Conquest, the Monasteries of our Island were ranged under three different classes : — I. Those which observed the rule of St. Gregory the Great, as the Monastery of Christ Church, Canterbury. II. Those which followed the rule of St. Columba of Icolmkill, as the Monasteries of Lindisfarne and Ripon. III. Those which observed the rule of St. Benedict of Nursia, in the Dukedom of Spoleto, in Italy . k Of these, the last was pre-eminent in England ; and to this class belonged the Abbey of St. Mary, at York, which was founded in A.D. 1088 ; — and from this institution, the Religious House which forms the subject of our work, took its beginning in A.D. 1132. But the Benedictine Order had experienced an innovation abroad in the rise of that of the Cluniac; for Odo, Abbot of Cluni, £A.D. 9273 added to the ancient rule of Benedict many severe and burdensome ceremonies. 1 When this order became deteriorated, another branch arose, — the Cistertian, being also considered an improvement upon the Benedictine rule. The monks of Fountains' preferred the Cistertian discipline ; and as this preference led to the founding of their establishment, the circumstances con- nected with, and immediately preceding this transaction, will here find their appropriate place. k Lingard's Antiquities of the Anglo-Saxon Churches, p. 105. Carwithen's History of the Church of England, vol. i. p. 156. 1 Helyot, Histoire des Ordres Religieuses, torn. v. Carwithen's History of the Church of England, vol. i. p. 158. 6 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. Robert, Abbot of Molesme, in Burgundy, of the Order of St. Benedict, having fruitlessly laboured to revive the primitive austerity of his profession in his own convent, retired in A.D. 1098, with about twenty of his fraternity to Cisteaux, a place situated in the diocese of Chalons. 1 " Robert, however, was importuned to return, and preside over Molesme, which he did till his death, in A.D. 1108. On his return thither, Alberic was chosen second Abbot of Cisteaux, A.D. 1099, under whom a Bull was procured from Pope Pascal II. in A.D. 1100, by which the new monastery was taken under his protection. Alberic and his monks drew up the first rules of the Cistertians, but for no other use at that time, than for their own house, as a reformed society of Benedictines. By these rules they bound themselves to those of St. Benedict, agreeing to cut off all those contrary customs which had crept into some religious houses. Amongst these offending customs was the use of furs and rich skins, indulgence in superfluous habits, ornaments of beds, and luxurious living, or at least such as was deemed luxurious n by the rule of St. Benedict. They also resolved to have lay-brothers wearing their beards, with the Bishop's permission, who should be treated like themselves, — and to accept of such lands, vineyards, meadows, lakes and mills as should be freely offered them ; m And about thirty miles S.E. of Rheims. " Under this term was comprized " variety and plenty of meat, the use of fat bacon, and other the like extravagances." CISTERTIAN ORDER, A.D. 1098-1109. 7 and having settled farms in some places, they ordered that lay-brothers should be sent thither to take care of them. In A.D. 1109 Alberic died, and was succeeded by Stephen Harding, an Englishman. He extended the plain- ness and simplicity of his rule to the very ornaments of the church, prohibiting gold and silver crosses, and allowing none but of wood, painted. He also retrenched the great number of candlesticks, and retained but one, and that of iron. He allowed only one censer, and that of copper or iron. The chasubles or cassocks were to be only of fustian or linen. The chalices he suffered to be of silver, gilt ; but never of gold. At Cluni, on the other hand, the utmost magnificence was observed in the worship, the very candelabra glittering with precious stones. What has just been narrated, naturally leads to an account of the observances of the Order, which we therefore now present as briefly as is consistent with perspicuity. " They are to sleep in their habits, and after Mattins p are not to return to their beds. For prayers, they so conclude, that before the Lauds it may be day-break. Stevens's Supplement to Dugdale's Monast. v. ii. p. 24. p " The seven Canonical hours were by the Hermits of St. Romualdus, in Italy, thus divided and observed : — Mattins, at midnight ; Lauds, at break of day; Prime, immediately after sunrise; Tierce, three hours after sunrise ; Sext, six hours after ; Nones, nine hours after ; Vespers, towards the going down of the Sun; and Complem, \Completorium\ just as the day was spent. Mattins and Lauds were, however, by some other Orders thrown into one ser- vice, and began as Lauds ahout 3 A.M." — MS. Complem of the English Dominican Nuns at Bruges. 8 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. Immediately after Lauds they sing the Prime ; and after Prime, they go out to fill up their hours in work. None of them are to be absent from their diurnal hours, or the Complin. When the Complin is finished, the Steward of the house, and he that hath the charge of the guests go forth, but with great care of silence serve them. The Abbot is present with his flock, except at meat ; his table being with the strangers and poor. Nevertheless, he is abstemious of talk ; nor hath he or any of them ever above two dishes ; nor do they eat of fat or flesh except in case of sickness ; and from the ides of September till Easter they eat but once a day, except on Sundays. They go not out of the precincts of their cloister except to work ; but neither there, nor any where do they discourse with any other than the Abbot or Prior." q Silence, indeed, was one of the prime rules of the Order. Their manual labour was as follows : — " In Summer, after m chapter, which followed Prime, they worked till Tierce, and after Nones till Vespers. In Winter, from after mass till Nones, and even to Vespers during Lent. In harvest, when they went to work in the farms, they said Tierce and the conventual mass after Prime, that nothing might hinder their work for the rest of the morning ; and often they said divine service in the places where they were at work, and at the same hours as those at home celebrated it in the Church." r q Dugdale's Warwickshire: Fosbrooke's British Monachism, p. 113. r Fosbrooke, p. 113. CISTERTIAN ORDER, A.D. 1130. 9 Their rules forbade them from wearing shirts, or furred skins. Their habit was originally of a dark colour, like that of the Religious at Molesme ; but they pretended that the blessed Virgin had miraculously patronized the change to white. 8 They were called White Monks, from their being clad with a white robe, which was in the nature of a cassock. With this was worn a black scapular and hood.' Their garment was girt with a black girdle of wool. In the choir they had over it a white cowl, and over that a hood, with a rochet hanging down round before to the waist, and in a point behind to the mid-leg. When they went abroad they wore a cowl and a large hood, both black. The lay-brothers wore dresses nearly similar, but all of a dark colour. The choir dress of the Novices who were clerks, was entirely white. The great austerity of this new order recommended its votaries to the Roman court. Under the abbacy of Stephen, already mentioned, it was accordingly exempted by Pope Innocent II. from paying tithes to the mother-foundation of Cluni, and to the parochial, or secular clergy. Peter, Abbot of Cluni, apparently uneasy at the rising fame of his more ascetical brethren, had before urged with some plausible reasons, that though they professed a purer discipline, they had nevertheless no claim to the merit of monastical consist- ency. He now complains with bitterness at the grant which s C. Henriquez, Fasciculus Sanct. Ord. Cisterciens. torn. i. p. 22. k See Vignette of the Costume. 10 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. relieved and aided them at the expense of his own order." The substance as well as the issue of the matter may be given in a few words : — the Cluniacs were rich, the Cister- tians were poor, and the Pope was inflexible. This new order owed its chief celebrity however to the accession of St. Bernard, one of the most celebrated men of his age, who having devoted himself to the monastic life, had, with thirty-three companions, joined the monks of Cisteaux in A.D. 1113. v In the same year a second Cister- tian house was erected, that of La Ferte in the diocese of Chalons; in 1114 was founded that of Pontigni in the diocese of Auxerre, and in 1115 that of Clairvaux or Clare- Valle, in the diocese of Langres. w Of this house St. Bernard himself became the first abbot; and such was his zeal in the cause of his order, that at his death he left seven hundred monks in his own monastery, and witnessed the establishment of nearly one hundred and sixty Cistertian houses, furnished with Religious sent out chiefly under his patronage and authority. There was no affair of consequence, in his time, in which he was not employed. No potentate, civil or ecclesiastic, possessed such real influence in the Christian world as he did ; and though he stood the highest in the judgment of others, he remained the lowest in his own. 11 Henriquez, Fasc. Sanct. Ord. Cist. pp. 41 — 43. v He was born in A.D. 1091, at Fontaines, a town in Burgundy, of which Tescelin, his father, was Lord. — Du Pin's Eccl. Hist. Cent. XII. chap. vii. w And North of Dijon. ENGLISH CISTERTIAN HOUSES, A.D. 1131. 11 His power, however, was not always employed to the best purposes, pure as his intentions undoubtedly were. The Crusade of Louis VII. was supported by his eloquence, and he unhappily prevailed on numbers to join in that absurd expedition, which, in its consequences, was pregnant with misery and ruin/ His order in time became so powerful as to govern almost all Christendom, both in spiritual and temporal affairs. y Certain Cistertians sent over successively by Stephen and Bernard to obtain a footing in England, were favourably received. The fruit of the mission from Stephen was the founding of the monastery of Waverley in Surrey, by William Giffard, Bishop of Winchester, in A.D. 1128. This was the first of the order in England. The second was that of Rievaux in this county, which was instituted in A.D. 1131, under the auspices of King Henry I. and through the liberality of Sir Walter L'Espec, who placed in it the monks sent over by Bernard ; William, the familiar friend of Bernard, and the head of the mission, being their first abbot. 2 They are described as men, holy, religious, glorying in poverty, and at peace with all, except- ing their own bodies, and the common adversary. Their x Du Pin, Cent. XII. chap. vii. Chalmers's Biograph. Diet. Encyclop. Brit. y Appendix (A). z It is proper the reader should be here informed, that for so much relating to the subject of our history as beginning hence reaches to John De Cancia the twelfth abbot, we are principally indebted to the narrative given by Serlo, a monk successively of this house and of Kirkstall, and by Hugh, also a monk of Kirkstall, as preserved in Dugdale's Monasticon, vol. 1, pp. 733 — 752. — See Appendix (B). 12 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. austerity created them admirers in the Benedictine Abbey of St. Mary at York. Blameless as the monks and the abbot of this house were acknowledged to be, certain of the fraternity became discontented with the more rational life to which they had been accustomed, and thirsted after the perfection of their new exemplars. Of these converts, Richard the sacristan, Ranulph, Gamellus, Galfridus, Hanno, Thomas and Gualterius, privately bound each other to attempt the introduction of the Cistertian discipline. At first they concealed their purpose from Richard the prior, but on his being apprized of it, he also was moved to unite with them. Their number soon increased to thirteen ; and they began to devise their departure, fearless alike of want, and of the inclemency of the approaching season, and only anxious how they should accomplish their object without giving offence to such of the brotherhood as remained at York. As soon as their plan was divulged, it created dissatisfaction. It was replied to them, that they cast an imputation upon the discipline they were about to leave, disturbed the unity which had hitherto prevailed, and cast a stumbling-block in the way of their weaker brethren. These charges were natural. The history of this, and of every class equally ascetic, has shewn that their precepts, however admired by the fervour of novelty, were broken through in the lapse of years, whilst we find that the Benedictine rule, from its greater moderation, prevailed from first to last, and was SECESSION FROM ST. MARY'S, YORK, A.D. 1132. 13 as durable as it was pre-eminently popular. Galfrid the abbot was advanced into a good old age. It would have been extraordinary in him to patronize a change from the rule of life in which he had been brought up, and which he appears to have practised with consistency, and with satisfaction to his brethren. He reminded those who desired to leave their abbey, that they should respect their vows, that they were not in their own power, having solemnly bound themselves to the rule which they had as yet observed. He, moreover, threatened to exert his authority, and to punish their disobedience. But they remained fixed in their resolution. Richard the prior was an intimate friend of Thurstin the Archbishop, and interested him in their behalf. The Archbishop appointed a day for the visitation of the abbey. The abbot hearing of his intention, sent messengers to the heads of the various monasteries throughout the king- dom, who came prepared to support his cause. The Arch- bishop came on the day appointed (which was the 6th of October, 1132) with a great concourse of Canons and Religious. The abbot, similarly attended, but with monks only, went forth to meet him, and to forbid his entrance with so numerous an assemblage; at the same time urging that the secular clergy ought not to be made a party in the affairs of the Chapter. The Archbishop retorted the abbot's congregation of monks ; and refusing to come in by himself, a rush was made by both parties, the one 14 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. to obtain, the other to refuse admittance. The Prelate then commanded silence, and said, "Ye, this day withdraw the obedience due to us ; and we, by the authority of God, withdrawing that power which ye have from us, interdict this Church ; and by the same authority, suspend the monks that shall continue therein, from the perform- ance of divine service." Having said thus, he and his party retired into the Church — probably his Cathedral. The thirteen dissentient monks went away with the Arch- bishop who entertained them in his house for eleven weeks. Their names were, besides the seven before- mentioned, Richard the prior ; Robert de Suella [of South- well;] ; Gregory ; Gervase the sub-prior ; Radulphus, and Alexander. Another monk also joined them, Robert of Whitby, afterwards founder and abbot of Newminster in Northumberland. Galfrid, the abbot, in the mean time preferred his complaint to the King, and acquainted all the principal religious houses with what had transpired. Thurstin, the metropolitan, wrote on the other hand, in defence of himself and the Cistertians to William, Archbishop of Canterbury, the Pope's legate. What was the result of this correspondence, we are not directly informed : but succeeding events lead us to infer that Thurstin prevailed. In the interim, Gervase the sub-prior, and Ralph returned to the abbey. Gervase, however, finally rejoined his seceding brethren. Ralph remained under the Benedictine rule. In December, the Archbishop went with his attendants FOUNDATION OF THE INSTITUTION, A D. 1132. 15 to celebrate Christmas at Ripon. a While there he assigned to the monks, whom he had patronized, a settlement about three miles west from thence, in a place called Skell-dale, b in the patrimony of his Cathedral of St. Peter, and gave them afterwards the village and lands of Sutton in that neighbour- hood. After their place of abode had been solemnly con- firmed to them, they proceeded to the election of an abbot. The Archbishop presided, and their choice (which was unani- mous) falling upon Richard the Ex-Prior of St. Mary's, he confirmed the election, and invested the newly-chosen abbot with full authority for the discharge of his office, by bestowing upon him the usual episcopal benediction. Their thoughts were now directed to the preparing of an habitation. There was an elm in the middle of the vale. Under this they slept, notwithstanding the severities of winter — a winter, however, sufficiently moderate to suffer the tree to retain for a while, after their coming, all the honours of its verdure, and thus to afford shelter to man. They a A MS. of the Thirteenth Century in the Library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, on the foundation of the Monastery, entitled " Quo modo Funta- nense cenobium sumpsit exordium," assigns the 27th of December, 1132 [6th of the Calends of January] for the foundation of the Monastery. b At that time a most inhospitable place, and described as more proper for a retreat of wild beasts than of the human species ; the dell being overgrown with brush-wood. It obtained in time, and has since continued to retain the name of Fountains. Whether this name was conferred in honour of the birth-place of St. Bernard, (See note, p. 10) or arose from the monks being accustomed to latinize the Saxon word Skel (a Fountain), cannot be determined with certainty. Dr. Whitaker inclines to the supposition that the latter was the occasion of the change. — History of Craven, pp. 192 — 202, 2nd edit. 16 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. soon after threw over the branches a covering of thatch, as a protection against the inclemency of the weather. They had also a poor hut covered with turf. But this was not used, as probably it was too small for their dormitory. They, therefore, slept together beneath the tree — twelve priests, and one sub-deacon. Thurstin supplied them with bread, and the Skell with water. At night they rose to their vigils, and sang the service according to their in- stitute. By day they laboured in the construction of an oratory, and in the laying out of gardens. Their provisions were but scanty. It is supposed that they soon changed their elm for a shelter of seven yew-trees, growing on the south side of the Abbey , d and which, from standing near to each other, formed an excellent cover, nearly equal to that of a thatched roof. "Under these trees," says Dr. Burton, "we are told by tradition, the monks resided till they built their Monastery, which seems to me to be probable, if we consider how little a yew-tree increases in a year, and to what an amazing bulk these are grown. And as the side of the hill was covered with wood, which is now almost cut down except these trees, it seems as if they were left stand- ing, to perpetuate the memory of the monks' habitation there, during the first winter of their residence." 6 When the winter was over, they dispatched messengers c Dugdale's Monast. Angl. vol. i. pp. 738, 739. 11 Six of which are yet standing. See page 105. e Burton's Monasticon Ebor. p. 141. RICHARD, FIRST ABBOT, A.D. 1133. 17 When the winter was over, they dispatched messengers to St. Bernard, acknowledging him as their father, and his Abbey of Clairvaux as their mother, and requesting him to give them instructions for their observance of the Cistertian rule. Thurstin likewise wrote to him to com- mend them to his care. Bernard answered their epistle in terms of condolence for their past difficulties, and of congratulation for their zeal. He also replied to that of Thurstin, commending him for the spirit he had displayed in this matter. He likewise wrote to the abbot of St. Mary's, exhorting him to exercise charity to the monks who had for conscience sake, and through the earnestness of their piety, left his monastery. The love of moderation and peace seems to have prevailed over the feelings of displeasure in the mind of the abbot during the interval, and thus coinciding with the spirit of Bernard's exhortation the whole matter came to an amicable conclusion. The messengers from Fountains returned to the new institute, and with them Galfrid whom Bernard had com- manded, though in his old age, to come over to this country, and instruct his new disciples. Their number was now augmented by the accession of ten Novices, — some of them priests, others laymen. Having as yet received no fresh donations, they subsisted on the kindness of Thurstin. Not only, however, were they now them- selves increased, but, led by the report of their sanctity, many others resorted to them. This, together with a D 18 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. famine which then prevailed, brought them into such straits that they were obliged to eat the leaves of the elm boiled with a little salt and some meal to temper the bitterness of the mixture. The benevolence of the abbot is, however, reported to have risen above the pres- sure of distress, inasmuch as he commanded a supply of bread to be given to a poor and importunate applicant at the time when the brotherhood themselves were well nigh reduced to their last loaf. In this extremity they were greeted with the sudden and unexpected appearance at their gate of a waggon laden with bread, the gift of Eustace Fitz-John, owner of Knaresborough Castle. The monks gave thanks to God for this seasonable supply, and acknowledged his hand. They passed the summer with sustenance barely ade- quate to their wants, and laid up the scanty store of their industry at the end of the harvest. For two years the community had to endure the extreme of poverty, so that the abbot felt himself compelled to solicit the assistance of St. Bernard, who appointed him and his monks a settlement for a season on the lands of Clairvaux. But during the abbot's absence, the difficul- ties under which his brethren laboured, were removed by the munificence of Hugo, Dean of York, a man of considerable wealth, who joined their body, and endowed them with all his possessions, amongst which were copies of the Holy Scriptures. Thus commenced the library of RICHARD, FIRST ABBOT, A.D. 1134—1136. 19 the monastery. They appropriated their new endow- ments to the use of the poor, to the building of the monastery, and to the support of the monks. The abbot on his return found the monastery in comparative pros- perity. Incited, probably, by the example of Hugo, Serlo, a canon of the same Church, who was rich both in gold and silver, and Tosti, another canon, gave their substance also, and lived amongst them many years. These contributions to their possessions were soon fol- lowed by a grant from Robert de Sartis, a military man, living in the vicinity, who with his wife Raganilda gave to their foundation the village of Harleshow, with the lands adjacent/ and the forest of Warksall. These bene- factors were both buried at Fountains. About this time also, Serlo of Pembroke, a young courtier, who had possessions in the neighbourhood, being on the point of death, sent for the abbot, whose comfort he desired in his extremity, and gave to the monastery the village of Caiton, which he had received of the King. He also was interred here. Soon after this the abbot obtained from the bounty of Nigel de Albini [TJ'Aubigny]], father of Roger de Mowbray, the grange of Aldeburgh and its appurtenances. Henceforth the society rapidly advanced in numbers and possessions. In the fifth year of their foundation the Lord Ralph de Merley came to visit the institution, and was in con- sequence moved to establish and endow a house of the same f In which was Morker, now Mackershaw. — See Burton's Monast. p. 183. 20 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. order, — New Minster, in Northumberland, which was founded in the year 1138. This was the first daughter-institution of Fountains. Robert of Whitby, before-mentioned, a man modest in demeanour and holy in his conversation, was appointed abbot, and was for several years the pious and renowned pastor of the new foundation. Soon after this Hugh Fitz-Eudo consulted the abbot of Fountains on the founding of the Religious House of Kirkstead, in Lincolnshire. About the same time the abbot was also entrusted by the munificent Alexander, Bishop of Lincoln, with the establishment of a Cistertian House at Haverholme. On the second of February, A.D. 1139, there- fore, two monks were sent out, — one, under Robert of Southwell, as abbot of the monastery of Kirkstead, the other, under Gervase, as abbot of Haverholme. g Both these newly-appointed abbots were of the number of the first monks of Fountains. The abbot of Fountains having formed a friendship with Alberic, Bishop of Ostia, the papal legate, who had come on an embassy to England, was led to accompany him on his return to Rome, to realize the prospect of promotion which Alberic held out to him. On his arrival there he was taken ill of a fever, of which he died on the 30th of April, 1139. h g The monks of Haverholme soon afterward removed to Louth Park, one mile and a half from the town of Louth. h He is inserted in the Catalogue of Saints and Men of blessed memory. The anniversary of his obit was held on the 15th of May. — See C. Henriquez, Menologium Cistertiense, p. 162. RICHARD, SECOND ABBOT, A.D. 1139—1143. 21 On the death of their abbot the monks sent to Clairvaux for the advice of St. Bernard, who directed their choice to Richard the Prior, one of the first settlers, and who had been sacristan of St. Mary's Abbey, at York. " His virtues," says his biographer, " shone in his countenance." He was possessed besides of great knowledge of human nature, which is said to have fitted him eminently for the duties of the confessional. He was ungraceful in his speech, but this is attributed rather to his modesty than to any natural defect. He went more than once to Clairvaux to St. Bernard that he might by his influence be permitted to resign his office. In this, however, he was unsuccessful ; for though Bernard yielded so far to his request as to accede to his resignation if it should be also approved by the monks ; yet they, on his arrival at home, and having had the letters of their benefactor laid before them, declined their consent to his resignation ; but were willing, however, to allow him a year of remission from the duties of his abbacy. He that year [11433 went again to Clairvaux, where he died, and was buried. During the last three years of his life, he, with several of the clergy, regular and secular, opposed the election of William, the treasurer of York, to that see, in the room of Thurstin, who had died in 1140. William was consecrated by Henry, Bishop of Winchester, the legate of Pope Lucius II., but was rejected in the following year by Eugenius the succeeding Pope, in favour of Henry Murdach, a friend of 22 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. St. Bernard, and probably patronized on that account by the abbot of Fountains. This affair, which agitated the pro- vince of York for full seven years before its final settlement, will presently occupy our attention in a fuller manner. The monks, as had been heretofore their custom, resorted to the advice of St. Bernard, with regard to the choice of a new abbot. Their patron, having taken their case into his consideration, commended to them Henry Murdach, of the monastery of Valle Clare, 1 extolling his merits with much affection, and exhorting them to hear him in all things as himself. Henry was forthwith unanimously elected abbot. He was accounted a model of firmness and in- tegrity. He did not find the convent in that state of austerity which the rule of the order demanded, but having succeeded in the enforcement of a stricter discipline, he is hence described as the reformer of the institution, and the promoter both of its spiritual and temporal prosperity. Under his administration the society obtained the granges of Caiton, Kilnsay, and Marton le Moor. k ' In the diocese of Laon. k In A.D. 1145, Hugh de Bolebec consulted the abbot on the founding of Woburn Abbey. A number of monks, with Alan as their abbot, was sent out from hence, and it was established in the same year, as a house dependent upon Fountains. In the following year also Sigward, Bishop of Bergen, came over to England and visited this monastery. At his request the abbot sent over with him certain monks, together with Ranulph, (one of the number who had seceded from St. Mary's) as their abbot. They departed on the 10th of July, 1 146, and on their arrival in Norway, founded the abbey of Liz. Ranulph afterwards returned to Fountains, where he died in a good old age, and in high repute for his sanctity. This Norwegian monastery does not appear to have been instituted subject to / HENRY, THIRD ABBOT, A.D. 1143—1146. 23 Henry took part, as his predecessor had done, against William, Archbishop of York. That prelate, on the ground that his election was uncanonical, was, as already mentioned, refused consecration by Eugenius III. Eugenius had been a monk of Clairvaux, and was a familiar friend of St. Bernard, and therefore naturally desirous of furthering his wishes. The object of those wishes, on Bernard's part, was the elevation of Henry to the see of York in the place of William. Hence the abbot of Fountains was marked for destruction by such of the military as were adherents to the metropolitan. They proceeded to his monastery in con- siderable numbers with the intention of gratifying their revenge upon his person. Being disappointed in their search of him, they forthwith set fire to the monastic buildings, all of which, except half of the oratory, fell a sacrifice to the flames. Henry escaped, unseen, unhurt, — for, as the historian adds, " the hand of the Lord protected him." This lamentable conflagration took place apparently in 1146. The fraternity, however, with the assistance of their benevolent and wealthy neighbours, 1 applied them- selves promptly to the reparation of these ravages, and the buildings were re-instated in a better style than before. any control of Fountains ; probably from its being established in a foreign land, and where the connection could not be easily kept up. 1 Among their benefactors, Alan, fourth Earl of Britany and Richmond, then living, was one ; and as he gave all his wood at Masham towards building the abbey, it is quite probable it might be on this very occasion. — Burton's Monast. Ebor. p. 149. 24 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. Henry, who had been the disciple of Bernard, together with Eugenius, left England in the following year (1147) m to concert with the former, and to plead his cause with the latter, as to his promotion to the chair of York. He found the Pontiff at Treves, who removing thence to Paris, held a council, in which the dispute concerning William's election was debated and determined. It ended in his apparently unjust deposition by the Pope, and the consecration of Henry by Eugenius's own hands in the same year, against the wishes of the majority of the cardinals ; for William was, as well as Henry, a man of untainted character, and confessedly as worthy of, and equal to the dignity as his competitor. St. Bernard is much censured for the part he took against William. The most admissible m This year is rendered worthy of remembrance, by the sending out of a body of monks from this foundation, at the request of Henry de Lacy, Baron of Pontefract, to establish a house under the Cistertian rule, near the borders of Lancashire, and which finally ended in the founding of the celebrated abbey of Kirkstall. Alexander, the prior of Fountains, was sent out as abbot, and with him twelve monks (among whom was our historian Serlo) and ten lay- brothers : they took their departure on the 1 9th of May. The place to which they first went, and which had been assigned them by their patron, was Ber- noldswick. Out of regard to their mother-institution of Fountains, they called it St. Mary's Mount. Its situation and climate being however exceedingly unpropitious, at the end of their sixth year they removed to Kirkstall, where, from their proximity to Fountains, and other circumstances, they for many generations kept up, with more fidelity than was usual, their filial relation and a close intercourse with their maternal house. In this year also was founded, under the auspices and control of Fountains, and through the munificence of William, Earl of Albemarle, the monastery of Bitham in Lincolnshire. A small number of monks was sent out from hence for that purpose on the 23rd of May. The name of their house was changed afterwards to that of Vallis Dei, or Vaudey. HENRY, THIRD ABBOT, A.D. 1147. 25 excuse that can be offered for his conduct, was his credulity in believing the false reports propagated against William." It is, however, gratifying to find that William, when afterwards admitted to the see, laid aside all those feelings of asperity which might naturally be engendered by the strenuous and persevering opposition of the society of Fountains, and commiserating those disasters to their house, of which he had been the innocent occasion, visited them with pastoral solicitude, and on terms of Christian cordiality. He even promised satisfaction for all the injuries they had sustained, and doubtless would have made good his promise, had not his sudden death pre- vented it. King Stephen, offended at the deposition of William, who was his nephew, required of Henry an unusual oath on his taking possession of the see, which oath he declined. The King is said to have contented himself by merely threatening punishment; but the citizens of York, who held William in great and deserved reverence, refused to admit Henry within their walls. He, hereupon, excom- municated them. Eustace, the King's son, in contempt of his authority, forbade the cessation of the sacred rites. On this account, and because the King's ministers every- where oppressed all who had assisted in the expulsion of William, sedition and tumult daily spread throughout the n Dugdale's Monast. vol. i. p. 748. Bower's History of the Popes, vol. vi. pp. 57 — 59. £ 26 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. province, and especially in the city, where the senior Archdeacon, a friend of Archbishop Henry, was beheaded. The King was at length (viz. in 1151) reconciled to Henry, who, during his troubles, had taken refuge at Ripon; he was peacefully received at York, and governed the see with great exactness till his death which took place at Sherburne, or, according to John of Hexham, at Beverley, in about six years from his consecration. 11 Turning from this digression to the affairs which are immediately connected with the establishment, we are next brought to the successor of Henry in the abbacy. For some short time, in 1147, the abbacy remained vacant, but on Henry's consecration, he commended to the monks, Maurice, a monk of Rievaux, to be their head, who there- upon was created abbot. He, however, within three months resigned his office, and returned to his monastery in the early part of the year 1148. Maurice was educated at Oxford, became a Cistertian monk in the abbey of Ford, in Devonshire, and thence removed to Rievaux. He was a man of erudition, and amongst other works he left behind him one entitled "De Pontificali Schemate." His resignation is attributed to his love of study, in preference to an active life. q The turbulencies and agitation arising out of his predecessor's acquisition of the archiepiscopal i 1 Godwin de Prsesulibus, p. 671. Trivetti Chron. apud D'Acherii Spicile- gium, torn: iii. p. 147. See also note, page 28. infra. q Leland de Scriptoribus, vol. i. pp. 232 — 235. Henriquez, Fascic. Sanct. Ord. Cist. vol. ii. p. 295. / MAURICE, THORALD, & RICHARD, A.D. 1148—1169. 27 dignity, together with the fear of a repetition of similar occurrences, might also contribute to strengthen his re- solution of retirement. He appears to have outlived his departure from Fountains full forty-five years. To Maurice succeeded (in 1148) Thorald, who also was a monk of Rievaux. He was well read in the sacred Scriptures, and equally versed in the liberal arts, but on some disagreement between him and his metropolitan, he resigned his trust, by the order of St. Bernard, and returned to Rievaux, after having presided two years. An undue love of power has been assigned as the cause which led to his removal; 1 but the particulars have not been handed down to us. He was an author as well as his predecessor, but the very names even of his works have sunk into oblivion. 8 The convent on this vacancy again sent to their spirit- ual director, St. Bernard. He, at the inducement of his friend Henry, the Archbishop, commended to them Richard Fastolph, a native of York, who had been abbot of Valle Clare, and was at that time precentor of Clairvaux. Henry is said to have assisted him in the duties of his office, on which he appears to have en- tered in the year 1150.' He is described as an example 1 Burton's Monast. Ebor. p. 210. s Pitseus de Reb. Anglicis, vol. i. p. 917. 1 In his first year, William, Earl of Albemarle, the noble patron of the Cis- tertians, founded the Abbey of Melsa, or Meaux, in this county. The first monks of its establishment were sent out from Fountains, with one of the 28 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. of self-denial, and a great promoter of the piety and wel- fare of his house/ but he had to contend with a sedition that arose during the early years of his abbacy in his monastery, and which he thought he could not repress more effectually than by retiring for a season from his office. This produced the effect : — he was recalled ; and after punishing the offenders, he spent the latter part of his government in tranquillity/ He died full of years and of good works on the 3rd of May, 1169, and was buried in the chapter-house. He was placed in the Catalogue of Saints and Men of blessed memory of his order; his commemoration-day was held on the 18th of November/ He wrote a Book of Homilies, and also a Treatise on Music and Harmony. x Soon after, apparently in the latter part of the same month in which his predecessor died, Robert, Abbot of Pipewell, in Northamptonshire, was called to the govern- ment of the house. In liberality and munificence he brotherhood, named Adam, as their abbot, on the 28th of December, 1150. The site of this new foundation was abundantly fertile and well watered, but difficult of access in the winter. This was, to use the words of Serlo, their and our annalist, the seventh and last daughter of Fountains. See Appendix (C.) u In one and the same year, and in the early part of his presidency, died the three following personages, w ho, as connected with the annals of this house, to say nothing of the affairs of the age, had acquired the character of celebrity : — Pope Eugenius III., on the 8th of July, 1153; St. Bernard, on the 20th of August; and Henry Murdach, Archbishop of York, on the 14th of October. v Bale, Script. Brit. Cent. XIII. p. 150. w Henriquez, Menologium Cistertiense, p. 386. x Pitseus de Reb. Anglicis, vol. i. p. 216. ROBERT AND WILLIAM, A.D. 1169—1190. 29 exceeded all his predecessors. The wants of the poor, and the comfort of strangers, had a large share of his regard. He erected costly edifices for the monastery, and reformed the manners of its inmates. The abbey increased in possessions under him, and in the number of the monks. It was during his abbacy that the monastery obtained most of the princely grants of Roger, Baron de Mowbray, son of Nigel D'Aubigny, together with the generous and valuable gifts of the Lady Alicia de Gaunt, wife of Roger, who seemed to emulate her husband in her munificence to the establishment/ The abbot was taken ill on his return from a general chapter, and died, beloved and revered, at Woburn, on the 10th of January, 1179, after having ruled nine years, seven months, and twenty-five days. He was brought from Woburn, and buried in the chapter-house. After a vacancy had remained for a short time, the monks found a successor to Robert, in William, Abbot of New Minster, who, from having been an Augustinian Canon of Gisburne £Gisborough]] Priory, had taken upon him the Cistertian Order, at New Minster. There, though his health had been injured by his bodily mortification, he had presided prosperously for several years, when he y The abbot and convent presented Roger de Mowbray with the sum of 120 marks, to assist him in his journey to Jerusalem. The benefits which the monastery received in return, whether regarded as matters of gratitude or stipu- lation, were very great indeed. The grants of the house of Mowbray to this institution were truly noble. — Whitaker's Craven, p. 202. Burton's Monast. Ebor. p. 159. 30 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. was called to the more honourable office of Abbot of Fountains. He is said to have been a mild and prudent governor, to have received advice with readiness, and to have been blest with the sight of increasing possessions to the house. If the panegyric be as well deserved as the statement of augmenting wealth was true, there need be no doubt of his being highly worthy of esteem. He presided about ten years; died the 8th of October, 1190, and was interred in the chapter-house. To William succeeded Ralph Haget. He was a man of rank by birth, and had spent his earlier years in military life. Being wearied of the vanity of the world, he took the monastic habit in this house when about thirty years of age, from the hands of Abbot Robert. From hence he was elected Abbot of Kirkstall in 1182, wherein, however, his rule does not appear to have been blessed with much either of peace or prosperity/ He was trans- lated to the abbacy of Fountains in 1190. This abbot is celebrated by his contemporaries for his virtues, his devotion, and his enjoyment of the various services of the church. He likewise diligently visited the religious houses under his jurisdiction. His compassion for the poor during a famine which severely prevailed during his government, led him to provide a temporary accommoda- tion as a shelter for their bodies, where they partook of the relief provided for their necessities, and were attended z Whitaker's History of Craven, p. 63. Dugdale's Monast. Angl. vol. i. p. 751. RALPH, NINTH ABBOT, A.D. 1190—1203. 31 at the same time by priests to perform the offices of religion. This may be considered as leading to the establishment of the permanent Eleemosynary, afterwards erected by John de Cancia, one of his successors. After presiding well for twelve years, seven months, and fifteen days, he died A.D. 1203, and was buried in the chapter- house. In the early part of his presidency (viz. in 1193) the Cistertians, we are told by Stowe, made an offering of the whole of their wool for one year as a contribution to the ransom of Richard I. In this we may suppose the house of Fountains to have joined. In the latter part of his life, his brother Galfrid, or Godfrey, a man of considerable possessions, gave on his death-bed to the monastery, Thorpe-Underwood, together with lands in Elwick and Widdington, both in that vicinity ; and very soon after, King John, in the second year of his reign, granted the monks the privilege of free warren in the first-named place. The whole of this place [Thorpe]] was converted into a grange for the use of the monastery by the demolition of the buildings and the removal of the inhabitants, a procedure of no uncommon occurrence in the history of Cistertian houses. 3 What provision was made for the inhabitants, our worthy historian does not inform us, leaving us unfortunately to an inference un- favourable to the equitable consideration and humanity of a Dugdale's Monast. Angl. vol. i. p. 856. Whitaker's History of Whalley, pp. 409, 410. 32 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. those concerned in the matter. We might conclude this to have taken place after the abbot's death, even had his historian not told us so, as his alleged virtues forbid us to make him a party in a transaction which seemed to imply such a want of regard to his brother's memory in the person of his surviving dependents. The real motive for this and similar proceedings may probably be inferred with truth from the fact — that all Cistertian foundations began about this time to be ex- empted by papal privilege from the payment of tithes of all such lands as they held in their own hands, or cultivated at their own expense* Ralph was succeeded by John of York, who, from having been a monk of this house from his youth, was chosen Cellerarius or Household Steward, next preferred to the abbotship of Louth Park, and thence finally, in A.D 1203, to preside over Fountains. He was affable and generous, — b The first grant of this kind to Fountains appears to be that of Pope Hono- rius III., in the fifth year of his pontificate, A.D. 1221 ; but other monasteries of the same order in England had enjoyed the same privilege for more than half a century before. — Dugdale's Monast. Angl. vol. i. pp. 709 — 732. That this privilege did not long exist before it was abused, may be seen from the language of Prynne: "The Cistertians and other monks," says he, " totally exempted by several Popes' Bulls from payment of tithes of the lands manured by them with their own hands, or at their costs, [i, e. their own lands] fraudulently enlarged their privileges by tilling, renting, and manuring other mens' lands, to the great prejudice of Rectors of Parish Churches, whose rights and tithes they invaded." This went so far as to draw a complaint, and a prayer for redress from one prelate at least of that day — Richard, Bishop of Lincoln, to Walter de Merton, Bishop of Rochester, and Chancellor to Edward I., A.D. 1273. — Prynne's History of Papal Usurpations, fyc. [in temp. Ed. I.] p. 129. JOHN OF YORK, TENTH ABBOT, A.D. 1203—1210. 33 the very pattern of Christian courteousness and charity, and not less versed in policy, than exemplary in virtue. Our Abbot had not enjoyed his office twelve months, before King John, in the general oppression of the order, under pretence of raising money to defend himself against Philip, King of France, demanded twelve hundred marks from this house, at the instigation of Richard de Marisco, one of his rapacious advisers, afterwards Chancellor to King Henry III., and finally Bishop of Durham. d This considerably impoverished the community, and for a time caused a dispersion of the monks. Returning prosperity after a while however visited them. They resumed their former flourishing state, and their numbers began again to increase. The foundation of that venerable pile, the church, the massive strength and elegance of which still remain conspicuous in its very ruins, was laid in 1204, by this c The estimation in which he was held, may be inferred from the circum- stance of Maud, Countess of Warwick, and co-heiress of the Lord William de Percy (the third Baron of that name), appointing him her executor jointly with her Nephew, Henry de Percy. She was buried here in the 6th of King John, A.D. 1204-5, and appears to have been the first of that noble family whose remains were deposited within these walls. — Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 380. d For the payment of this large sum (equal in value to seven or eight thousand pounds at the present time), the abbot entered into a composition with the king ; but the terms seem to have been so hard and rigorous as to compel the monks to part with some of their sacred vessels, and even of their sacerdotal vestments. This appears to have taken place in the 4th of King John, A.D. 1202-3. — Prynne's Papal Usurp, vol. iii. p. 6. F 34 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. Abbot, who before his death had proceeded so far as to erect some of the pillars. 6 He departed this life in the eighth year of his presidency, on the 8th of December, A.D. 1210, and was buried in the chapter-house, before the President's seat. His monu- mental stone, discovered about forty years ago, having the inscription of his name upon it, may now be seen in the chapter-house/ John Pherd, or, as he is denominated by Willis, John of Fountains/ was his successor, and appears to have entered upon his office in the year 1211. He carried on the building of the church with expedition, and after ruling for about eight years, resigned the abbacy, being promoted to the see of Ely, — to which he was elected early in the year 1220, by Pandulphus, the Pope's legate, — Stephen Langton, Archbishop of Canterbury, — and the Bishop of Salisbury. e Among the contributors in lands, timber, &c, to this noble part of the fabric, as well as to the buildings previously erected by abbot Robert, we find Roger de Mowbray and the Lady Alicia de Gaunt, his Wife. Nicholas de Caiton, and others, contributed to the building of the church exclusively, but in a degree vastly inferior to the Mowbrays. For the general purposes of the Monastery, Alicia de Romille, one of the co-heiresses of Alicia, Baroness of Skipton, the celebrated Patroness of Bolton Priory, ought not to be forgotten as a munificent benefactress about this period. 1 The discovery was made by the late Mr. Martin, of Ripon, in consequence of perusing the notes in Burton's Monasticon, describing the places of the in- terment of several of the abbots. This led to a search, which was successful. — Farrer's History of Ripon. 6 This local name does not appear to have been adopted or conferred till he had quitted Fountains for Ely. JOHN DE CANCIA, TWELFTH ABBOT, A.D. 1220. 35 To him succeeded, as twelfth Abbot, John de Cancia, or John of Kent, A.D. 1220. He finished that magnificent structure, the church, which his two immediate predecessors had assiduously carried forward, — " an admirable work, happily begun, but more happily consummated." 11 He built also the Cloister, the Infirmary, and the Eleemosynary, or Xenodochium, a house of reception for poor strangers. 1 He was an active, good man, and greatly improved the state of the abbey. After a presidency of about twenty-seven years, he died on the 25th of November, 1246, and was buried near the President's seat in the chapter-house, where the stone bearing the memorial of his interment was recently dis- covered, with that of his predecessor, John of York. k Thus far we have brought down our history of the community, chiefly under the assistance of our worthy 11 Leland, Collectanea, vol. iii. p. 109. 1 Tanner considers the Hospital at the gate of the Monastery, for the poor of the neighbourhood, and for travellers, erected as early as the reign of Richard I. [A.D. 1189], to be a distinct institution from the Monastery, and describes it under the name of Fountains' Hospital.- — Tanner's Notitia, p. 678. If so, it might merge into some of the monastic appendages afterwards built. k In the latter part of his abbacy, (26 Henry III., 4th of October, ] 242,) the King having engaged in an ill-advised expedition against Lewis IX., King of France, commissioned the Archbishop of York, and others, to demand an aid of money or wool from the Cistertians, under a proviso that it should not be drawn into a precedent against them. They, however, bearing in mind the mal- appropriation of an exaction made about twelve years before by him, joined in a refusal, and, as Prynne remarks, " would grant him nothing but their prayers." This the King resented by refusing to give permission to their Abbots to repair to the general chapter of their order, held the following year at Clairvaux. — Prynne's Papal Usurp, vol. iii. p. 100. Matth. oj Westm. Lib. II. pp. 128, 170. 36 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. monk, the annalist of the house, and we have now arrived at a period, when, by the completion of the numerous and costly edifices of their establishment, in the enjoyment besides of privileges bestowed almost to profusion, by regal and papal power, 1 and when having attained the possession of territories so ample as to be equalled by few religious houses of the age, m their history appears in its brightest outward aspect. Their fame for sanctity had brought numberless contributors to their revenues," and considerable accessions to those who entered their walls as devotees to their rule of life ; and the wealthiest and noblest of the land sought for a place of sepulture within their sanctuary. Henceforth, however, we shall be compelled by incidental circumstances (in the absence of more direct evidence) to consider their purity as on the wane, and to view their wealth, subjected to painful fluctuations and reverses, in which it is somewhat difficult to say whether there was most of misfortune or matter of blame. The very privileges which this order enjoyed from papal patronage were calculated in their exercise to blunt the edge of those devotional feelings, which may be supposed to have at first possessed them on their separation from their laxer brethren, the original Benedictines, — in particular, the ex- 1 Appendix (D). m Appendix (L). " Appendix (E). JOHN DE CANCIA, TWELFTH ABBOT, A.D. 1246. 37 emption from tithes of all their lands, while occupied and cultivated by their own body. This, besides being a direct and unjust invasion of the rights of the parochial clergy, could not but operate to secularize the fraternity by making it their seeming advantage to grasp at the occupation of the most extended tracts of land in order to enjoy the corres- ponding benefit of the exemption. In this they were too well aided by that part of their own system which included the conversi, or lay-brothers in their societies, — who thus were ever at hand ready to be sent out to take charge of their numerous farms. p Nor was this all, — the temptation to become direct occupants, led frequently to the displacing of numerous inhabitants resident on the lands granted to them, in order that they might convert those places into granges and permanent settlements for themselves. - These procedures were not calculated to promote the growth of kindly feelings even in their own body; and were too often attended with much hardship to the dispersed. In short, these and similar practices brought the Cister- tians in time to be considered rather as wealthy farmers than as ecclesiastics/ This privilege was however limited to such endowments as were made before the council of Lateran, A.D. 1215, but as the greatest or a considerable number were really of a prior date, or taken by consent to be so, the exemption may be considered as general, at least. — Fuller's Ch. Hist. p. 283. p See p. 7. o See p. 32. r Fosbrooke's British Monachism, p. 113. 38 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. Our historical materials relating to this house become from hence very scanty. No trace of any direct narrative of the state and fortunes of the institution appears to guide us. Whether we are to assign the want of later records to their wanton destruction at the general sequestration, as Fuller surmises/ or as others think, to their sinister sup- pression at the same period by the grantees of the possess- ions; or whether, with Dr. Whitaker,' we are to attribute it to a decay of industry in the monks, who neglected in proportion to the laxity of their practices to perpetuate their respective annals, — the fact is undoubted, that scarcely any of the English religious houses can present that unbroken connected history of their own affairs, after the fourteenth century, — which nearly all of them can shew before. 11 The principal repository of information on the subject, — the production of Burton on the Monastic houses of this county, has indeed been resorted to occasionally in com- piling the following pages, but it may be mentioned as a matter of regret, that the want of care in the collation of the otherwise valuable matter of that work greatly diminishes its value to the historian, and calls for caution that its errors be not admitted with its truths. These deficiencies premised as causes of the brevity of the remaining narrative, we resume with the mention s Fuller's Church History, p. 335. 4 History of Craven, p. 42. u See Appendix (F). STEPHEN, THIRTEENTH ABBOT, A.D. 1252. 39 of Stephen de Eston, as the thirteenth Abbot, and successor of John de Cancia, in 1246. He had been the Cellerarius of the house, and was afterwards created Abbot of Sallay, where he ruled ten years ; — then of New Minster, and lastly of Fountains. Here he presided nearly six years, and dying the 6th of September, 1252, was buried in the chapter-house of the Monastery of Vaudy, or Valle Dei, in Lincolnshire. He was succeeded by William de Allerton, who was created Abbot, being the fourteenth, on St. Maurice's Day, £22nd of September]] in the same year, — and ruling about six years, departed this life the 1st of December, 1258, and was interred before the President's seat, in the chapter-house. In the year 1253, during his abbacy, Lord Henry de Percy had a controversy with the Convent respecting the Manor of Rainton, and a grange in Wheldrake, which terminated in his resigning those places to the monks, under the reser- vation however of liability to foreign service, and to service at his court at Topcliffe. v Adam, the fifteenth Abbot, next appears. Of him nothing more can be learnt than that his death occurred a few months after his election, — on the 30th of April, A.D. 1259. Alexander, the sixteenth Abbot, was apparently elected in the same year, and after governing till the 11th of October, A.D. 1265, departed this life, and was buried in the chapter-house. v And even these services, as they regarded Rainton, were afterwards remitted by Lord Henry, his Grandson, in 1328. — Burton's Monast. pp. 180, 181. 40 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. In the last year of his life, he was summoned to a parlia- ment, to be held at Westminster, the 28th of January, A.D. 1265 [>9 Hen. HI/], being the first Abbot of the house known to be called to that dignity." Reginald appears as the seventeenth Abbot. He was elected soon after the death of his predecessor, and after presiding a little more than nine years, died on the 25th of October, A.D. 1274, and was also buried in the chapter- house. Peter Aling was elected as the eighteenth Abbot, in April, A.D. 1275, the abbacy remaining vacant nearly six months. He retained his office but a few years. From various concurrent circumstances of the time, the rising marks of internal dissensions and mismanagement in the society, now begin to force themselves upon our notice. Poverty, — it may be partly from a burden left by expenditure in their buildings, — but chiefly it is to be apprehended from a laxity of manners, involving personal extravagance, appears about this time to be stealing upon them. It is hardly to be doubted that the latter cause must be principally assigned for the apparent fact. What else can we urge as a more probable reason for this supposition, when we find the head of a richly endowed and splendid establishment offering all its immunities " Whether there was any summons directed to any of the former abbots cannot be ascertained, as the writ of this year is the first of the kind now extant on the rolls. — Stevens's Supp. to Dugdale, vol. ii. Append, p. 13. Rai>in's Hist, of Eng. vol. i. p. 340. PETER ALING, EIGHTEENTH ABBOT, A.D. 1275. 41 and exuberant privileges as a pledge and security for the fulfilment of a commercial bargain ? And yet such was the case, — thus exhibiting a specimen at once of the apparent causes and evidences of the embarrassments of the house. The transaction alluded to is best given in the words of Prynne. " The Abbot and Convent of Fountains, of the Cistertian order," says he, "selling sixty-two sacks of wool to Merchants of Florence, which they were to deliver to them at several dayes, for which they received of them beforehand at London, six hundred and ninety marks and a half, of good new money, entered into recognizance, with strange conditions, and renunciations of all priviledges grant- ed them by the King or Pope, and all inhibitions from either, not to be sued upon it out of the realm."" It must have been pressing need that drove them to an- ticipate their produce by the sale of at least part of it, full three years before it could be grown. Management, which rendered a payment in advance so necessary, as to lead to a mortgage of every valuable right they had, in order to obtain it, may be concluded as having been any thing but good. This presumed decay of prosperity may be naturally sup- posed to have led to dissensions, and we need not therefore be surprised to hear that our Abbot was thought at length unfit to be trusted with the office to which he had been x Prynne's Papal Usurp. 4 Edw. I. A.D. 1276, vol. iii. p. 185. See Appendix (G) for a translation of the deed. G 42 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. elected. He was deposed in the year 1279. He was however honoured with burial in the chapter-house, after having survived his deposition about three years. His death occurred the 11th of August, A.D. 1282. His successor was Nicholas, the nineteenth Abbot, — created on the 8th of July, A.D. 1279. His rule extended through only a few months. He departed this life on the 26th of December, in the same year, and was buried in the chapter-house, near his predecessor Reginald. He was followed by Adam, (the second of that name) the twentieth Abbot, — who was created on the octaves of St. John the Baptist, Cist of July]], A.D. 1280. In this year, King Edward I. conferred on the house the right and privilege of free warren in their demesnes of Morker, Somerwith, Aldburgh, Sleningford and Sutton, — whether in aid of their straitened circumstances, or from pure regard to their establishment, does not appear/ Roger de Mowbray (the seventh Baron of his house) also granted them in the same year, all the beasts of chase and the wild fowl of the whole forest of Brimham, for the use of their Infirmary, and all his other rights of forest there. This Abbot, after presiding somewhat fewer than four years, died on the 16th of May, 1284, and was interred in the chapter-house. y He followed this up in the twentieth year of his reign, [A.D. 1292] in their still greater need, by granting them similar privileges in their Manors of Baldersby, Marton le Moor, Thorp Underwood, Kilnsay and Bordley in Craven, and Bradley. — Dugdale's Monast., by Ellis and Bandinel, vol. v. p. 289. HENRY, TWENTY-FIRST ABBOT, A.D. 1284. 43 Henry de Ottelay, the twenty-first Abbot, his suc- cessor, was created on the Feast of St. Barnabas, £llth of June^] in the same year. He governed the house for some- what more than six years. His death took place on the 24th of December, 1290, and his remains were deposited in the door-way of the chapter-house. His temper appears to have been amiable, even somewhat easy, if we may judge of him from a very brief notice given at the time by one of his dex- terous brother abbots, the affairs of whose house were then probably involved in more difficulty than those of his own. 2 During his abbacy, was undertaken the celebrated taxation of Pope Nicholas IV., of all the ecclesiastical possessions in the kingdom, for the payment of tenths to the papal see ; and though it did not come into operation till about two years after our Abbot's death, may here be appropriately noticed. It will serve, besides, to shew the estimated annual value of part of the possessions of the Monastery at the time. a To Henry, succeeded Robert Thornton, the twenty- second Abbot, — in A.D. 1291. The President Book of Fountains states that he died on the Feast of St. Thomas the Apostle, [[21 Dec/] 1306, and was buried in the chapter- z " But what it was that touched the Abbot of Fountains with compassion, by what reasons he was overcome, and how induced to give up a great deal for a little, it would not be prudent to trust to paper." Letter of Hugh Grimston, Abbot of Kirkstall, to his Convent, dated Castle Reginald, A.D. 1287. The whole letter is worth perusal, but is too long for insertion here. See Whita- ker's History of Craven, p. 66. a See Appendix (H). 44 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. house. It would appear, however, that he did not retain his office till his death; but that he previously resigned it, — probably in the year 1300. The pecuniary resources of the Monastery had by this time sunk into a deplorable state. In the first year of this Abbot's entering on his office, we find that the King [[Edward I.]], to use the words of Prynne, " granted his protection to the Abbey of Fountaines, of the Cistertian order, which formerly were very wealthy, but then grown poor and indebted." b The custody of the Abbey was committed by a deed from the King, to John de Berewyk, Canon of York, and one of his principal officers of state, for the payment of the debts of the convent. This was soon after followed up by an epistle sent, in A.D. 1*294, from John de Romaine, Archbishop of York, (their Diocesan) to the visitors deputed by the maternal house of Clairvaux, representing to them the miserable and disordered state of their daughter-institution of Fountains ; which, as he expresses himself, had made itself a bye-word and a subject of derision to the whole kingdom/ The decayed condition of their affairs still was not so great as to be without some mitigating circumstances. One b Prynne's Papal Usurp, vol. iii. p. 450. c Appendix (I). d Tanner's Notitia, p. 654. Burton's Monast. pp. 142, 143. It is not un- likely that they had laid themselves open to the practices of the Jewish usurers, who supplied the necessities, and held the securities of not a few of the embarrassed institutions and individuals of that day. ROBERT, TWENTY-SECOND ABBOT, A.D. 1294. 45 of these occurred during the present year, in the termination of a controversy which had arisen a little before this time between that powerful Baron, Lord Henry de Percy (the first Baron of Alnwick) and the Abbot, respecting the vale and forest of Litton, granted by one of that nobleman's ancestors. The decision was in favour of the Monastery, under certain payments and reservations. The noble litigant appears afterwards to have become reconciled to the Con- vent, as we find he was buried within their walls. 6 They had however to bear a part in the contributions to the necessities of their sovereign, which in this reign were peculiarly oppressing, and scarcely were they relieved from these burdens before they were called to the endurance of great straits from other causes, — the incursions and ravages of the Scots, — and although their misery might, from these latter visitations, be greater than that we suppose them to have been now enduring, yet it had this alleviation, — that it was not a subject of self-condemnation ; and was besides calculated to engage the sympathies of the benevolent and wealthy in their behalf. In this year [1294T] the King, availing himself of the transfer of the tenths made to him by Pope Nicholas, for the prosecution of the war in the holy land, turned them e Whitaker's History of Craven, p. 505. Appendix (E). The Abbot was also, soon after this, [A.D. 1298] similarly successful in a contest with John de Marmion, Lord of Tanfield, who had claimed the Abbot's homage in respect of lands within the Manor of that Baron. The matter was ended by the Abbot's producing a charter of exemption. — Burton's Monast. pp, 178 — 183. 46 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. to his own more private purposes, by appropriating them to defray the expenses of a war with France, in which he was about to engage. He first commenced by causing all the monasteries to be searched, and the money deposited in them for the crusade to be seized/ At Fountains we may surmise there would be little to obtain; — but poverty, for the time being, seems to have been no excuse, for we afterwards find the Abbot was summoned with the rest of the Clergy, to meet the King in person, in a council of their body to be held at Westminster, in the same year, on the feast of St. Matthew the Apostle [[21st of Sept/], to contribute to his aid. 5 He there made a demand, in addition to the tenths already levied, of one half of the profits of their revenues for one year. This, as well it might, excited their astonishment. They f Rapin's History of England, vol i. p. 374. Prynne's Papal Usurp, vol. iii. p. 584. s Parlimentary Writs, by Palgrave, vol. i. p. 621. So constant and un- remitting was the King in his demands for money, that we find the Abbot called again to a parliament, held at Westminster in the following year [Nov. 1295], for the express purpose of furnishing him with another large supply. On this occasion, by a display of some firmness, the Clergy came off on easier terms than before. They consented to grant only one-tenth of their goods. The King finding it expedient to maintain a good understanding witli them, accepted their offer ; and actuated as we may hope by still better motives, soon afterwards issued a writ to the Prelates, and certain of the Abbots, among which the Abbot of Fountains was one, desiring their prayers for success in his negocia- tions and arms in France, — " a pattern," says Prynne, very truly, " worthy of imitation by Protestant Kings and Prelates, in times of war, and treaties of peace." — Prynne's Papal Usurp, vol. iii. pp. 641, 670. Matth. of Westm, A.D. 1295. ROBERT, TWENTY-SECOND ABBOT, A.D. 1296. 47 hesitated. The King however insisted, and under a threat of force for their seeming reluctance, they were awed into compliance. 11 In return for their contribution, he made to this Abbot and his Convent (as well as to others of the Clergy) a grant of his special protection by sea and by land, for themselves, their servants, and all their possessions. Under the im- poverished circumstances of this house, it is probable the protection was thought dearly paid for, — and that the Monastery would take less benefit by the grant, than they would have derived from the retention of their contri- bution. The famous contest respecting the crown of Scotland having arisen about this time, [[A.D. 1296)] the necessities of the King once more pressed him to renew his demands on his subjects for pecuniary aid. The Clergy were again resorted to, (together with the Laity) and we find the Abbot summoned this year also to a parliament to be held at Bury St. Edmund's, on the morrow of All Souls [[Nov. 3^.' The Clergy thought themselves excusable from further contribution, in consideration not only of the aid granted in the preceding year, but more especially of the payment of their half year's profits in 1294, and declined compliance. The contention ran so high, that the King proceeded to seize the estates and moveable possessions of some of the h Collier's Eccles. Hist. vol. i. p. 493. i Parliamentary Writs, by Palgrave, vol. i. p. 621. 48 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. monasteries, and absolutely put the ecclesiastical body out of the protection of the law, by prohibiting any one to plead their causes. Aided though they were by all the spiritual power of that lordly and encroaching pontiff, Boniface VIII, — they were at length obliged again to yield, — and compounded for the restoration of their possessions and privileges by a surrender, — some of one-fourth, and others of one-fifth, of their revenues and goods. k While this conflict was carrying on, the King availed himself of the opportunity to exercise his prerogative in forbidding, among others, the Cistertian orders from send- ing, without his leave, any of those supplies of money, wool, or merchandise to their parent institution at Clairvaux, which they had been accustomed to transmit, as he alleged, to the impoverishment of themselves and others of his subjects. In this he probably did the English Cistertians greater service than they might at the time be willing to acknow- ledge. So difficult, however, was it to break an usage which had no doubt been found highly profitable to the foreign religious houses, that the King was obliged, within the space of nine years, to issue no fewer than six succes- sive writs of prohibition against this practice to various superiors of English monasteries, — of which the Abbot of Fountains was one. 1 k Prynne's Papal Usurp, vol. Hi. p. 689 et seq. Rapin, vol. i. p. 378. Collier's Eccl. Hist. vol. i. pp. 493-4. 1 Prynne, vol. iii. pp. 785, 858, 904, 1044, 1057, 1168. RICHARD, TWENTY-THIRD ABBOT, A.D. 1301. 49 In A.D. 1300, we find the Abbot again summoned to a parliament to be held at London, in Lent.™ In this parlia- ment, the King, to appease the just complaints of his subjects, confirmed the great charter, and the charter of the forest. He at the same time confirmed to this Abbot and Convent the lands which Isabella de Fortibus, Countess of Albemarle, had granted them." In this year, as has been before mentioned, and about the close of it, this Abbot seems to have resigned his office. His successor was Richard, (probably with the surname of Bishopton) as the twenty-third Abbot. He first appears in A.D. 1301, and from some indistinct evidence furnished respecting him, the space of about ten years may be as- signed for his governance. From the same evidence we learn that he died on the 16th of March, 1311, and that his body was interred in the chapter-house. About the time of this Abbot's entering on his office, the King, in prosecuting his designs for the complete m Pari. Writs, by Palgrave, vol. i. p. 621. " Abbreviatio Rotul. Orig. p. 110. ° The account given of this, and the preceding Abbot, and the duration of their respective governments, is involved in much obscurity and intricacy. This Abbot has no place at all in Burton's List of Abbots ; but somewhat more than twenty years are assigned to the government of one who appears as Robert Bishopton, — whereas, it is evident from other parts of the same work, that there were at fewest, two in office during that space. The account given in these pages may, perhaps, be found to approach as near to a reconciliation of the conflicting statements, as the distance of time, and want of direct evidence, will admit of. — See Burton, pp. 178 and 211 (Note) for Robert Thornton; and pp. 201 and 297 (Note); and Stevens's Supp. vol. ii. p. 41, for Richard [Bishopton]. 50 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. reduction of Scotland to his authority, met with an obstacle in the Pope, who put in a claim to the temporal jurisdiction of that kingdom, as appertaining to the holy see, and consequently asserted the right of sitting as judge in the controversy. A parliament was thereupon summoned, to be held at Lincoln, on the octaves of St. Hilary, [[20th of January 3 1301. To this the Abbot of Fountains was called, — and he was moreover enjoined to search the chronicles and archives of his house, for historical matter relating to the kingdom of Scotland, and to transmit the same by the best informed member of the Monastery to this parliament. p A similar injunction was sent to other religious houses, and to the two Universities. After solemn deliberation with his parlia- ment, the King determined to assert his own right against the Pope's interference, and to proceed with the war. In the year 1307, q the Abbot was summoned to the last parliament of this King, which was held at Carlisle, also on the octaves of St. Hilary/ This council was called to P Pari. Writs, by Palgrave, vol. i. p. 621. Prynne, vol. iii. pp. 885, 892. i Pari. Writs, by Palgrave, vol. i. p. 621. Stowe's Chron. pp. 210, 211. 1 He had been called four times to parliaments held at Westminster in the intermediate years of 1302, 1305, and 1306. At none of these, however, does any matter of great importance seem to have occurred, with the exception that in that of 1305, after solemn thanks having been returned by the King for a signal victory he had just obtained over the Scots, the assembly made a memorable and laudable stand against the usurping power of Pope Benedict IX. Pari. Writs, by Palgrave, vol. i. p. 621. Prynne, vol. iii. p. 1059 et seq. Stevens's Supp. to Dugdale, vol. ii. Appendix, p. 13. WILLIAM, TWENTY-FOURTH ABBOT, A.D. 1316. 51 deliberate on the state of affairs in Scotland ; and occasion was taken, during its sitting, to bring under consideration the intolerable papal grievances under which the nation groaned, which ended in a solemn and spirited remonstrance being addressed to the Pope, and edicts framed against their continuance. With the exception of mentioning that in this year the King granted to the Monastery an ample confirmation of all their privileges and landed possessions/ the notice of the above public act closes our account of the Sovereign and this Abbot. The former died within a few months after- wards. The latter in about four years. William Rygton appears as the twenty-fourth Abbot. His election seems to have taken place soon after the de- cease of his predecessor. He presided about five years, and dying on the 31st of May, A.D. 1316, was buried in the chapter-house. In the early years of the governance of that weak and unhappy monarch, Edward II., the Scots made another effort to deliver themselves from their yoke of servitude. This called forth an appeal from the King to his Nobles and Clergy, to prepare for an armament. We accordingly find a writ of the seventh year of that King, A.D. 1313, directed to the Abbot of Fountains, among other superior monastics, requiring him to furnish, through the hands of William de Melton, his Chancellor, and then provost of Beverley, as s Calend. Rot. Patent, p. G7. 52 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. the proportion of contribution from his Monastery, the large sum of two hundred marks, — a sum fully equal to one-third of the annual value of its estates.' The Abbot died in somewhat less than three years after- wards, and may be said literally to have been " taken away from the evil to come." Walter de Cokewald was his successor, and the twenty- fifth Abbot. He received the episcopal benediction on the seventh of June, A.D. 1316.° He entered on the government of the house under circum- stances the most unfavourable and unhappy. The celebrated victory of Bannockburn, obtained by Robert Bruce in A.D. 1314, "in which," says Rapin, "England suffered a defeat more terrible than had ever been endured from the beginning of the monarchy," opened the whole of the northern borders of England to the ravages of the Scots. Emboldened by unchecked success, they carried their aggressions more and more into the interior, till at length, in the spring of the year 1318, after passing through Northallerton and Borough- bridge, both which they burnt, they arrived at Ripon, which they took, and spoiled ; and forbore its total destruction, together with its church, by fire, only in consideration of the payment of one thousand marks by the inhabitants. They thence proceeded to Knaresborough and Skipton, both which fell a sacrifice to the flames, from their hands ; ' Rymer's Foedera, by Clarke and Holbrooke, vol. ii. part I. p. 225. u Dugdale's Monast., by Ellis and Bandinel, vol. v. p. 288. WALTER, TWENTY-FIFTH ABBOT, A.D. 1319. 53 and after a general devastation of the country through which they passed, they returned with immense booty, both of goods and cattle, to their own land/ These disasters might seem to have called for the most prompt and powerful remedies that could be devised ; but the King, more intent on humbling his barons than on protecting his suffering subjects, allowed nearly six months to pass before he took the matter even into deliberate con- sideration. After holding a parliament in London on this subject, no sooner, however, than Michaelmas, he held a like council at York on the 16th of December. At this the Abbot of Fountains, with others of the northern Nobility and Clergy attended, when the Earl of Richmond was commissioned to levy all the men within his jurisdiction, between the ages of twenty and sixty, to march against the Scots. w In the ensuing year, the enemy, while Edward was en- gaged in besieging Berwick, found means to elude him, and penetrated again into Yorkshire. It was on this occasion that the celebrated battle of Myton upon Swale, was fought with a body of ten thousand of the English militia, under the command of William de Melton, Archbishop of York, and the Bishop of Ely. The Scots, with far fewer men, obtained the victory, the English sustaining a defeat with T Holinshed's Chron. (Scotland, p. 222). w Rymer's Fcedera, by Clarke and Holbrooke, vol. ii. part I. p. 532. 54 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. the loss of three thousand men, — nearly one thousand of whom are said to have perished in the river. x This decisive victory obtained by the invading army within a few hours' march from the precincts of the Monas- tery, exposed it and the neighbourhood again to the chances of a wanton and barbarous spoliation. But this was not all, for in the year 1323 the Scots renew- ing their aggressions, calamity once more reached their very doors. Ripon was again visited by the invaders, in hopes of its furnishing a pecuniary compromise similar to that ex- torted on their former incursion. The inhabitants, worn out with the expense and prolongation of the war, were totally unable to comply with the renewed demand. The enraged ravagers, thus disappointed in the expectations they had in- dulged, forthwith set fire to the town and Monastery, and put a great number, both of priests and people, to the sword. y It could not be supposed that the community of Fountains would escape the effects of these hostile visits ; and ac- cordingly we find that they, in common with many others, drank deeply of the bitterness of this predatory war. In short, nearly the whole of their possessions, both in the north and west ridings of the county had been overrun, pillaged, and laid waste. 2 x Holinshed's Chron. (Scotland, p. 222). This has been usually called The while battle, from the number of English priests engaged and slain in it, in their surplices. It was fought on the 12th of October, 1319. y Leland's Collectanea, vol. i. p. 250. Stowe's Chron. p. 221. z Rymer's Fcedera, vol. iii. p. 802. WALTER, TWENTY-FIFTH ABBOT, A.D. 1323. 55 The injuries of even the first invasion of 1318, seem to have been so severe as to lead to the reduction of their imposts in the proportion of more than two-thirds the amount, and that proving insufficient — probably in con- sequence of the re-visit of the enemy in the following year, we find the King remitting from a considerable part of their property their taxes altogether. 21 So deep and lasting indeed do their calamities appear to have been, that on an inquisition taken in A.D. 1363, — just forty years after the third and last incursion of the enemy, — it was found that divers of their granges were so ruinous that they could not be repaired. b Of our Abbot and the Monastery we henceforth hear but little during the remainder of his government, except indeed a A new and reduced taxation of the religious houses in part of the province of York, having the celebrated Taxatio of Pope Nicholas as its basis, — took place in this year, chiefly on account of the invasion of the Scots, by which the Clergy of those border counties were considered unable to pay the former tax. Those which appear to have suffered most, were under this new taxation most favourably considered, — for whereas Jerveaux Abbey was estimated at £200. per annum under the old taxation, and £100. under the new, — Fountains, which was valued at £ 343.per annum under the old, was fixed under the new also at £ 100, — no more than the sum fixed for Jerveaux. Again, Furness Abbey, which was under the old valuation £ 176. per annum, was under the new only £13. 6*. 8d. We hence gather the probable degree of their losses, by the amount of reduction in their annual values.— Taxatio Ecclesiastica auctoritate P. Nicholai IV. pp. 320, 329 h. — and Rymer, ut supra. b Burton gives their names, and it may be remarked that their very locality is highly confirmatory of the truth of the historical narrative. They were Aldburgh, Sleningford, Sutton, Cayton, and Bramley, all within a moderate distance from llipon; — Cowton, in the line of road from the border to North- allerton ; — Bradley, near Halifax ; — Kilnsay, between Skipton and Middleham ; and Thorpe Underwood, a few miles south of the celebrated battle-field of Myton. — Burton's Monast. p. 143. 56 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. that the former was called to the parliament held at York in the year 1323,° and that the house was, in the year 1333, taxed towards an aid for the marriage of Alianora, the sister of the King, [[Edward III.)] in the sum of fifteen marks. In three years after this latter occurrence, (viz. in 1336) he resigned his office, — the earlier days of which may be said to have been marked with any thing but placidity and comfort. He survived his resignation about two years, and dying on the 8th of May, 1338, was buried in the chapter- house. He was succeeded by Robert Coppegyrie, the twenty- sixth Abbot, who was elected the 27th of May, A.D. 1336. No event of moment concerning the Monastery, or in which he himself was concerned, occurring during his president- ship, except indeed that the Convent obtained in the year in which he died the Chapel of St. Michael de Monte in the vicinity of the house, we have only to record that he de- parted this life on the 14th of March, 1346, and was interred also in the chapter-house. Robert Moulton, or Monkton, next appears, as the twenty-seventh Abbot. He was elected on the 19th of April, A.D. 1346, and received the benediction on Sunday the 30th c Stevens's Supp. to Dugdale, vol. ii. Appendix, p. 13. After this we hear of no more of the Abbots of Fountains being summoned. King Edward III. soon after reduced the number of the heads of religious houses usually called to parliament, from sixty-four Abbots and thirty-six Priors, to twenty-five Abbots and two Priors. The deprivation of this dignity might, at the time, seem a positive privilege to an exhausted house like this. — Tanner's Notitia, pref. p. xxvi. Tyrell's Biblioth. Politica, p. 401. ROBERT, TWENTY-NINTH ABBOT, A.D. 1390. 57 of the same month. His abbacy is equally destitute of historical memorials, with that of his predecessor ; d and we are only repaid for this dearth of information, by the hope that from the stillness of the times may be argued a return to peaceful enjoyments, and a gradual retrieval of former calamitous losses. This Abbot, after presiding somewhat more than twenty- three years, died on the 28th of October, A.D. 1369, and was buried before the altar of St. Peter, in the church. His successor was William Gower, or De Gower, the twenty-eighth Abbot. His election took place on the octaves of St. Martin [[Nov. 17^, A.D. 1369, and his bene- diction on Sunday, the 25th of the same month. The same remark may be made, and the same hopes indulged respect- ing him and the affairs of his Monastery, that were deemed applicable to the life and times of his predecessor. From some cause, not explained, we find he was led to resign his office in A.D. 1384, after governing the house somewhat more than fourteen years. He lived, after resigning, about six more years, and on his death, which took place in A.D. 1390, he was buried mid-way between the nine altars in the Lady Chapel. Robert Burley was his successor, and the twenty-ninth Abbot. He was elected the same day on which his prede- d He appears at least to have been held in esteem with the great. He was selected (circa A.D. 1366) as one of the baptismal sponsors to Thomas, afterwards twelfth Baron De Mowbray, and Duke of Norfolk. — Dugdale's Baronage, vol. i. I 58 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. cessor resigned. Under him we find nothing that breaks the repose of the preceding fifty years. Delivered from the turbulency of hostile commotion, and withdrawn as the Abbot of this house now was from the engagements of public and political life, we are led to presume that the Convent and its superior were, during these times, treading the paths of quiet and prosperity. They had, about two years after our Abbot's accession to his dignity, an ample confirmation from their sovereign £Rich. II/] of all their possessions and privileges, — which leads to the supposition that they now held them at least undiminished in their number and extent. The intercourse of the Abbot was likewise kept up with the daughter-institutions of the house, — particularly with that of Kirkstall, — with which Fountains appears generally to have maintained friendly and frequent communications ; and here our Abbot appears in the character of a guardian against abuses. 6 In the year 1409, we find him, as well as the Abbots of Rievaux and Byland, amongst others, sending procurators to the council of Pisa, held for the extinction of the schism between the rival Popes, Gregory XII. and Benedict XIII., — an incidental proof of the dignified rank which he and his Convent at this time held/ e See a letter of the Abbot of Fountains, to the Abbot and Convent of Kirkstall, in Whitaker's Hist, of Craven, p. 69. f D'Acherii Spicileg. torn. i. p. 860. JOHN DE RIPON, THIRTY-FIRST ABBOT, A.D. 1414. 59 We have thus at least, with our nearly unbroken mono- tony, all the marks of the accompaniment of peace. Our Abbot departed this life on the 13th of May, 1410, after having presided somewhat more than twenty-six years. Roger Frank, a monk of this house, appears nominally as the thirtieth Abbot ; but it is doubtful whether he ever was duly elected, or generally acknowledged by the Convent as their head. He entered on the office apparently in 1410, — but probably as little better than an intruder, — for we find that his election was opposed by John de Ripon, who afterwards became Abbot ; and that the contest was long protracted, — for in 1413 [1 Hen. V/] the King is represented as taking the Abbey into his custody, during the proceedings in the Roman Court between the two parties. g The cause was, however, determined against Roger; as we learn from Burton, that, "after much expense, he was expelled." h John de Ripon, therefore, appears as the thirty-first Abbot. He may be supposed to have been instated in his office about the year 1414. During the time of his governance, we discover some additional tokens of recovered dignity in the community. s " Controversia inter Roger Frank praetendentem se Abbatem de Fontibus et Joh. de Ripon, praetendentem se Abbatem de Fontibus post mortem Roberti ultimi abbatis ejusdem. Rex cepit custodiam dictae Abbatiae in manus suas, 14 Dec. [1413]."— Harl. MS. 6962, p. 124. Tanner's Noiitia, p. 654. h Burton's Monasticon, p. 211. 60 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. Would that we could also add of pristine simplicity, or of any proper appreciation of that scriptural truth, which was now beginning its struggles from darkness into day ! In the year 1415, we find him deputed along with four other English Abbots to attend the celebrated general council of Constance, at which were condemned the doc- trines of WicklifF and Huss;' and again, towards the close of his life, — in the year 1434, it is recorded that he was sent, on behalf of the English Clergy, to the general council held at Basil, under Pope Eugenius IV., with the sum of one thousand marks as their contribution. 11 The chief de- sign in calling this council, was the suppression of the so-called Bohemian heresy, and the reformation of the Church. Incidentally, however, a contest came on as to the power of a general council over the authority of the Pope. The point was long and strenuously contested on both sides. The English Church resolved to maintain the dominance of the papacy against those in the assembly who had determined in favour of the superiority of councils ; and to uphold that resolution, our Abbot appears to have been sent as a coadjutor to the rest of the English delegates already there. 1 On the 12th of March, in the following year, the Abbot 1 Rymer's Fcedera, vol. ix. p. 320. Lenfant's Council of Constance, vol. ii. p. 411. k Rymer's Fcedera, vol. x. pp. 578, 586. Harl. MS. 6963, p. 31. Excerpts from the Pat. Rolls of 12 Hen. VI. p. 1. 1 Collier's Eccl. Hist. vol. i. p. 661. JOHN, THIRTY-FOURTH ABBOT, A.D. 1442. 61 died at Thorpe Underwood.™ He was conveyed to Foun- tains, and buried in the nave of the church, before the entrance into the choir. Thomas Passelew was his successor, as the thirty-second Abbot. He was elected and made his profession of obedi- ence in the same month in which his predecessor died, — March, A.D. 1435. After ruling somewhat more than seven years, he was seized with the palsy ; and, in consequence, resigned his office, — on the 9th of September, A.D. 1442. He survived till the 23rd of October, in the following year. His place of burial was in the nave of the church, between the altars of St. Mary and St. Bernard, before the entrance into the transept. His successor was John Martyn, the thirty-third Abbot, who made his profession of obedience" five days after the resignation of the former Abbot, — September 14th, A.D. 1442. His continuance, however, was very short. He died on the 26th of the following month, — only three days after his predecessor ; and was buried between him and the Abbot John de Ripon, apparently in the transept. John Grenewell, Doctor in Divinity of the University of Oxford, succeeded as the thirty-fourth Abbot. His election appears to have taken place in A.D. 1442, — but his m Another proof of restored prosperity. For this grange to have become even the temporary residence of an Abbot, argues a strong contrast to the devastated condition in which it lay for some after the Scottish incursion. Vide page 55. B The profession of obedience was made at the time of the benediction. 62 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. profession of obedience not till January 17th, 1444, leaving his power of governance incomplete for more than twelve months, — if the dates be correct. He had sometime before been offered the abbacy of Vaudey, in Lincolnshire, but declined the honour, in order that he might devote himself to study at Oxford. After that, he was elected Abbot of Waverley, in Surrey, the earliest Monastery of this order in England, — and there governed two years. Of the affairs of the Monastery of Fountains, during the time he presided over it, we have no other information than what may be inferred from the circumstance of its being said of him, that he governed it for about twenty-nine years with great reputation, — a meed of praise which may not be unwarrantably considered alike creditable to the members and to the superior of the house. p Thomas Swynton, or De Swynton, was his successor, as the thirty-fifth Abbot. He received the episcopal benediction on the 6th of September, A.D. 1471, and after governing some- what more than seven years, he resigned. - Of the time and place of his death, and burial, no public record is known. John Darneton follows as the thirty-sixth Abbot. He " See page 11. P He appears as having been a guest at the sumptuous and memorable feast given by Nevill, Archbishop of York, on his installation, A.D. 1464 ; but otherwise in public life, we have no mention of him. He ranked there accord- ing to the order of precedence, as second Abbot in the province. — Leland's Collectanea, vol. vi. p. 3. His resignation would probably be in the latter end of 1478 ; since he appears as making a grant of Abulay Grange, near Halifax, to the Prior of Nostel for life, — on the 12th of July in that year. — Burton's Monast. p. 148. JOHN DARNETON, THIRTY-SIXTH ABBOT, A.D. 1484. 63 was elected to the abbacy on the 5th of February, A.D. 1479. During his governance, we have little to produce concerning the Monastery. We find, indeed, the rules of the order and of the house mentioned incidentally in laudatory terms, in a letter to the Abbots of Buckfast, Beaulieu, and other Cistertian superiors, from King Richard III., who, while requiring those Abbots to give their contributions to the building of Bernard's College/ about to be erected at Oxford, for Scholars of the Cistertian order exclusively, exhorts them to conform themselves to the good rules of their order, as committed to the Abbots of Fountains, Woburn, and others. 8 We also find the same King, in 1484, while at Middleham Castle, on the death of his Son there, granting the Convent a licence to dispose at their pleasure, of certain lands lying within the Lordship of Middleham ;' — and soon after grant- ing a commission, dated from York, empowering Sir William Gascoigne, and others, to compose certain differences which had arisen between his £the King's]] tenants at Knares- borough, and the Abbot and Convent." It seems to have been the good fortune of this Abbot, to keep clear of offence to both the rival houses of York r Afterwards St. John's College. s Catalogue of Harl. MSS. vol. i. p. 286, No. 433, Cod. 1572. 2nd Dec. 1483, Anno primo Rich. III. 1 Ibid. Vol. i. p. 295, No. 433, Cod. 1861. ■ Ibid. Vol. i. p. 297, No. 433, Cod. 1913. 64 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. and Lancaster ; for in addition to the slight reference we have given to the affairs of his house under King Richard III., we may notice that the Abbot was honoured to take a part in the attendance on King Henry VII., when in the first year of his reign, A.D. 1486, he made his progress to York. The King, on that occasion, attended the Minster with much solemnity on St. George's Day [[23rd of Aprirj , when the Abbot of St. Mary's was appointed to read the Gospel, and the Abbot of Fountains, as next in rank to him, the Epistle. v During his presidency, it would seem also that he had directed his attention to the repairing and beautifying of various parts of the Abbey Church. w He appears to have ruled the Monastery nearly fifteen years, but no memorial of his death or burial remains. Marmaduke Huby was his successor, and the thirty- seventh Abbot. He received the episcopal benediction from Archbishop R-otherham, on the 15th of January, A.D. 1494. His general character seems to have been that of a man of influence and business ; and from the scattered remains there are relating to him, we are led to believe that during the whole of his long government, he acted the part of a bene- factor to his house. In the year 1505, we find him obtaining from the Arch- v Leland's Collectanea, vol. xv. p. 192. w See the description of the Tower and Lady Chapel in the subsequent pages of this work. MARMADUKE, THIRTY-SEVENTH ABBOT, A.D. 1509. 65 bishop of York and the Prebendaries of Ripon, the Lady Chapel, and the site of the destroyed Monastery there, for the purpose of founding a cell of monks of his own order, as an appendage to Fountains/ A few years subsequent to this, his love of order, no less than his regard to the interests of his institution, commendably appears in his causing to be drawn out a register of all the lands and other possessions of the Monastery/ During the papacy of Leo X., this religious house, among others, seems to have come in for a share of that luxurious and ambitious pontiff's inauspicious regard. Among one of the many devices to fill his exhausted treasury, for which he made himself memorable in history, he would appear to have thought a return to the claim of annates, or first-fruits, from church and monastical property, a good expedient for effecting his purpose. The payment of this species of contribution had in- deed been expressly prohibited by a statute passed in the 6th of Hen. IV., in which it is called " a horrible mischief and damnable custom." 2 The Pope, however, thought otherwise; and accordingly we find this Monastery, with that of St. 1 Appendix (L). y " Registrum terravum, feodorum et possessionem! ad monasterium S. Marias de Fontibus pertinentium, quod rescribi fecit Marmaducus Abbas A.D. 1509. MS. penes honoratiss. com. Denbigh apud Newnham Padox in Com. Warw." — Tanner's Notitia. p. 653. Some general notion may be formed of the contents of this register, by reference to Appendix (L). z Trollope's Encyclopaedia Ecclesiastica. Art. Annates. K 66 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. Mary, York, and a Parish Church in the same Diocese, assessed at the sum of thirty florins of gold. a The Abbot appears to have departed this life in A.D. 1526, after having ably governed the Monastery for thirty-two years. From the time of his entering on his novitiate, to the time of his death, he had been about sixty-three years an inmate and member of this house. b He was succeeded by William Thirske, B.D. of the University of Oxford, as the thirty-eighth Abbot. He received the benediction on the 22nd of October, A.D. 1526, from the celebrated Cardinal Wolsey, Archbishop of York. d Of this Abbot nothing commendatory whatever can be said. Of all that preceded him, not one presents such a blemished character. His scandalous and profuse habits appear to have forced the very monks of his house to prefer their complaints against him, to their hereditary patron. a " Regestum Taxae in impetrandis Ecclesiis, Conventualibus, &c (immediate Romanae sedis subjectis) per totum orbem persolvendae. Marie de Fontanea, Ordinis Cisterciensis, unita fuit monas- In temp. terio Beate Marie Eboraci, Ecclesia Parochialis Hornstr. Papae Leonis X. [Qu. Hornsey in the patronage of St. Mary's, York?] solvit pro annata ejusdem, — Florenos 30." — Catalogue of Harl. MSS. vol. ii. p. 263, No. 1850, Cod. 18. b Letter of Marmaduke, Abbot of Fountains to Lord Dacre, Warden Gene- ral of the Borders of England, 18th of July, 1523. — Hearne's Rerum Angl. Script, vol. ii. p. 576. c Admitted to his degree of B.D. December 7, 1521, and on the 28th of January, 1529, he supplicated for the degree of D.D. — Wood's Fasti Oxon. vol. i. pp. 31, 45. d Dugdale's Monast., by Ellis and Bandinel, vol. v. p. 288. WILLIAM, THIRTY-EIGHTH ABBOT, A.D. 1526. 67 The following letter, written by Henry Percy, sixth Earl of Northumberland, to Thomas Arundel, Esq., (one of the gentlemen of the Privy Chamber to Cardinal Wolsey) re- questing his interference with the Lord Legate, will shew the causes of complaint : — " Myne entirely wel biloved and assured frend in right harty maner I signifye unto you that ther is credable infbrmacion maid unto me upon the sute and behalf of the convent and bretherne of the Monestary of Fountaince in the county of Yorke that the abbot there doith not in- devoure hymself lyke a discrete father towards the said covent and the profet of the hous but haith against the same as well solde and wastyd the great parte or all theyre store in Cataill as alsoo theyre wooddis in dyverse contries beyng in lyke manner as I am informed in his owne con- versation after such sorte as the quyet of the said hous which shoulde depende anenst theyme is moch tedews and uncharitable | wherby the service of Godd shuld not be maynteyned like to the ancient custome there | And for that mine ancestors and I are benefactours to the said Monestary | the informacion was more inforced to be maid upon me at this my beyng here to the intent uppon the premises I might cause ad- vertisement to be maid unto my singler good lord legate that his grace wd ponder the premisses by his power and auctorite of comission to some discrete fathers in that countrey of religious howses | therby to authoryse theyme that if matter of depryvacyon may be founde to have the same in execution with a free eleccion to be grauntyd by his grace to the said covent before the said religious persons commissioners | And the said covent havying especiall respect to the great comoditie and profet that may insewe upon the same, and the better maynteinment of goddis service | And perceyving in the contrary theyre great impoverysh- ment would for the increase agayn of the said hous | gyf towards the advancement of hys gracious lege, 500 marks to have lyke comyssion to be adressyd into the contrey desyring you most harlely for that I cannot by reason of my diseases attend my lord myself according to my bounden 68 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. dutie J that ye wolde be meane unto his grace upon the content with effect which as I perceyve shal be a right charitable act to be executed accordingly | And thus hartely fare ye well | at [Qu. Dal ton Percy?] besids Elsington. Yours assury'd H. NORTHUMBERLAND." e this xxvj. th day of June to my bed fellowe Arrondell. Notwithstanding the rank and influence of the applicant, and the offer, moreover, of a sum equivalent to two thousand pounds at the present day, to a monarch no way indisposed to accept it, even as a consideration for the performance of justice, — it remains doubtful whether any redress was obtained. The application, it is not improbable, came too late for the deliberation of the cardinal before his fall from power/ — even if the matter ever came before him at all ; and that the monks had to endure for some time longer, the rule of their worthless superior, whose profligacy and wastefulness seem to have gathered strength from impunity, the sequel will shew. His vices would, indeed, justify a more ample indulgence in the expressions of our indignation ; but the events of the time call us away, for a while, to the consideration of matters of greater and more general importance. In short, e Grose's Antiquities, vol. vi. p. 101. 1 This letter (which has not the date of the year affixed to it) must have been written between the middle of 1527, and the latter end of 1529. The noble writer did not succeed to his title till the year 1527, and Wolsey was deprived of his temporal dignities in October, 1529. WILLIAM, THIRTY-EIGHTH ABBOT, A.D. 1535. 69 that period had now arrived, when the cloud began to rise, which, in its bursting, swept away the whole of the religious houses of the kingdom. The celebrated quarrel between that despotic monarch, Henry VIII., and the Pope, terminating as it did, in a complete abjuration by the King of the papal supremacy, and in a transfer of the sovereign temporal dominion over the Church to himself, not only weakened the sense of his responsibility to the see of Rome, as a spiritual power, but threw exclusively into his hands that regulation and con- troul of the ecclesiastical possessions in his territories, the divided exercise of which had so often proved a source of contention between preceding Kings and Pontiffs. Having once loosened his subjects and their properties from all obligations to the Pope, he conceived himself entitled to exercise his newly-obtained power in that way which might appear most calculated to promote his private and political designs. The use of this power could not fail to give umbrage to all who, in their hearts, still adhered in their attachments to the papal sway. Hence discontents arose, which being fomented, especially by the monastic orders, drew upon those bodies the marks of his displeasure ; — and to maintain his own authority, punish the crimes with which many of them were but too justly chargeable, — and lastly, though not least in importance to himself, to replenish his own treasury, he determined on the sequestration of their possessions to his own use. 70 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. An appearance of justice was, indeed, expedient to be observed, and a commission was therefore issued to inquire into the state and condition of the monastic houses, and the manners of their inmates. It cannot be denied, that in many instances, the latter were unable to meet such an ordeal ; and the proof of their personal delinquencies being taken as the ground of the confiscation of their property, — the doom of their establishments was sealed. In short, spoliation rather than correction, or appropriation to better kindred uses, was the general design. Had the latter been the result of the scrutiny, the memory of this monarch would have been as deservedly eulogized for the investi- gation, as his justice has been since impeached for this act of his rapacity. The first commission issued in October, 1535 ; and about the middle of January, in the following year, the commissioners, (one of whom was Dr. Layton, Chaplain and Counsellor to the King, g ) reached this house. It has been said that the commissioners, from sinister designs, in many cases aggravated their statements in representing the disorders they discovered. Taking, however, into consideration, the character which has been previously given of the present ruling Abbot of this house, we shall not be much surprised at the following report rendered by Dr. Layton, to the Lord Cromwell, the Visitor General, respecting him: — 1 Wood's Fasti Oxon. vol. i. p. 10. Layton was afterwards Dean of York. / WILLIAM, THIRTY-EIGHTH ABBOT, A.D. 1536. 71 " Please your worship to understand that the abbot of Fountayns hath so greatly dilapidate his house, wasted y e woods, no- toriously keeping six w * * s, and six days before our coming he com- mitted theft and sacrilege, confessing the same; for at midnight he caused his chapleyn to stele the keys of the sexton and took out a jewel, a cross of gold with stones, one Warren a goldsmyth of the chepe was with him in his chambre at the hour, and there they stole out a great emerode with a rubye, the sayde Warren made the abbot believe the rubye was a garnet, and so for that he paid nothing, for the emerode but 20/. He sold him also plate without weight or ounces. Subscribed your poor priest and faithful Servant R. LAYTON." h From Richmont (in Com. Ebor.) the 20 th Jan. [1536]. The reports of the commissioners laid the foundation for the suppression, in the first place, of all the lesser monas- teries. By these are to be understood all those, the revenues of which did not exceed two hundred pounds per annum. This took place, by an act passed in the month of March, 1536. The execution of this act increased the hostility of the monastics to the King, and gave rise to the celebrated insurrection called the Pilgrimage of Grace. This origi- nated with the Prior of Barlings, in Lincolnshire, about six months afterwards. Though suppressed in that county, it, in a short time, reached Yorkshire, where it broke out at two successive periods, partly under a pretence that the ecclesiastical commissioners had been guilty of extortion u From Dodsworth's MSS. in the Bodleian Library. 72 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. and bribery in their visitations. In the last of these insur- rections, — which took place in 1537, the Prior of Bridlington, the Abbots of Rievaux and Jerveaux, and the Abbot of Fountains joined. This rebellious commotion, however, was, like the foregoing, soon quelled, and these ecclesiastics, with certain others of the laity, some of whom were men of rank, and engaged in the same cause, being found guilty of treason, were hanged, drawn and quartered at Tyburn, on the 5th of June, A.D. 1537.' Marmaduke Broadley, or Bradley, appears as the thirty-ninth, and last Abbot of this house. He entered on his office in the same year as that in which his predecessor was executed. He was Suffragan Bishop of Hull, and a Chaplain to the King, and had also been Master of the Hospital of St. Mary Magdalene, in Ripon. k 1 Stowe's Chron. p. 574. Oldmixon's Hist, of England, p. 105. Henriquez, one of the great annalists and eulogists of the Cistertian order, wishes to make it appear that our Abbot, and indeed all that suffered on this account and for other similar causes under Hen. VIII., were entitled to the crown of martyrdom. He has at least classed him amongst those who died for the faith. " Londini in Anglia,'' says he, "passio beatorum Guillelmi Trust [Thursk vel Thirsk] Abbatis Fonta- nensis, et Abbatis Riveriensis, Ordinis Cisterciensis, qui propter fidem suspensi, et in quatuor partes divisi martyrium subierunt, loco qui dicitur vulgo Tiburne, 1536 [1537] mense Junio, sub Hen. VIII." — Henriquez, Menologium Cistert. p. 185. Ibid. — Fasc. Ord. Cist. vol. ii. p. 436. After all, however, the blessed William appears to have been no better than a culprit. His remains, notwith- standing, seem to have been buried at Fountains. — See Lit. Gazette, January 14, 1832. k Dugdale's Monast., by Ellis and Bandinel, vol. vi. p. 620, It is not im- probable that he was put into the office by the King, with an understanding that he should resign when called upon to do so ; — the King s after the abolition of the Pope's supremacy, taking upon himself the appointment, by a Conge d'elire addressed to the Prior and Convent. — Burnet's Hist, of the Reformat, vol. j. p, 236. MARMADUKE, THIRTY-NINTH ABBOT, A.D. 1539. 73 The various disturbances which the King had, on one hand, experienced in accomplishing his desires in the suppression of the smaller monasteries, and on the other, the provocative given to his appetite by what he had already obtained, served to unite in fixing his resolution to suppress all the rest, and thus at once reduce the power of his disturbers, and gratify himself by the acquisition of their immense possessions. This resolution taken, it was accomplished partly by threats, and partly by artifice. The Abbots and Priors saw the King's determination ; and the greater number of them perceiving plainly that they should be obliged sooner or later to submit to his will, thought it most prudent to do it with a good grace, and thus make the best terms they could for themselves. This answered the design of the King, — as he now obtained their possessions by what were called voluntary surrenders' on their part, — and thus kept clear of much of the odium which would have attached to a more direct appli- cation of force. It now only required an act of parliament to confirm all the surrenders that had been, or should there- after be made, and to vest all these possessions in the King. This was passed in the 31st year of his reign, A.D. 1539. The Abbot and Convent of this house, made their sur- render on the 26th of November, in the same year, under annuities for life to the Abbot and other members of the house. m 1 But most falsely, — for, says Rapin, "not a soul could be ignorant how forced they were." m Appendix (M). L 74 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. One of the early projects and promises of the King, was the founding of eighteen new bishopricks out of a portion of the possessions of the houses intended to be dissolved, and Fountains was selected as one of the Monasteries, out of which was to be founded a Bishoprick for Lancashire ; but through a change of state policy, or the lavishness of his ex- penditure, the King's performances came far short of what he had given out he would do." Of eighteen sees, six only were founded. Fountains appears to have been too rich a treasure to be parted with gratuitously, and instead of having the honour to be anew devoted to the service of God, and the maintenance of pure and true religion, — it fell a sacrifice to the avarice or costly pleasures of this arbitrary sovereign. The abbey, with a considerable portion of its estates, together also with other monastic property in this county, was granted by the King, £32 Hen. VIII., October 1, 154(T], to Sir Richard Gresham, for about the sum of eleven hundred and sixty-three pounds. Other parts of its possessions came " Burnet's Hist, of the Reformat, vol. i. pp. 262, 268. ° This sum, although equivalent to about seven thousand pounds at the present day, may seem but small as compared with the rich possessions and ample income of this noble house ; but it should be remembered, — I. That no inconsiderable portion of those possessions were held under lease by its tenants, who on each renewal paid the usual fine, and thereafter only a small reserved rent per annum during the continuance of the term. II. That the grant itself to Sir Richard Gresham, was subject to certain reserved rents payable annually to the crown, [See Whitaker's Hist, of Cravens, p. 454] and was also charged with annuities payable to the abbot and certain of the subordinate members of the fraternity for life. Thus circumstanced, the apparent low amount of the purchase money is partly accounted for : — something however must be allowed for favouritism. DISSOLUTION OF THE MONASTERY. 75 into the hands of John Dudley, Duke of Northumberland, the father of the unfortunate Lord Guildford Dudley, who held them till his attainder in the reign of Queen Mary, when they were again dispersed among the courtiers of the day. The descendants of Sir Richard sold the abbey and part of its lands, in the year 1597, to the ancestor of Sir Stephen Proctor, Knt., one of the esquires of James L, by whom were confirmed to Sir Stephen, all the privileges which had been granted by Kings Henry I. and II., Richard I. and Edward I. Sir Stephen built Fountains' Hall out of the ruins of part of the abbey. His relict, Dame Honor Proctor, in 1623, con- veyed the property to Sir Timothy Whittingham, Knt., from whom, in 1625, it came to Humphrey Wharton, Esq., and from him, in 1627, to Richard Ewens, Esq. of South Cowton, whose daughter and sole heiress brought it, by marriage, about the year 1640, to John Messenger, Esq. of Newsham, in whose descendants it remained till it passed by sale, in 1768, for the sum of ,£18,000, from John Michael Messenger, Esq. to William Aislabie, Esq., the maternal grandfather of Mrs. Lawrence, the present possessor. Thus have we traced through succeeding generations, an institution rivalling the wealthiest in the land and the most distinguished of its order, in its possessions, its edifices, and its early fame for sanctity. All establishments, however, of human contrivance, even when dedicated to the purposes of piety and charity, are in themselves imperfect and liable to abuse ; nor was this free from such blemishes as are incident to the works of man, nor from those prejudicial errors which 76 HISTORY OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY. belonged to the age in which it was founded. The gloom of superstition obscured indeed that truth which its founders and patrons sought for themselves, and which they thought it their duty to impart to others ; but the acknowledged portion of good that was mingled with the evil in its composition and character, and, still more, its inherent capacity of being made available to better purposes, should have been its protection from violence and plunder. Its ruins present a mournful contrast to its once-flourishing condition ; and, while they remain, will they stand as a monu- ment of reproach to those who, in a cruel and remorseless spirit, wantonly destroyed the work of better men. DESCRIPTION OF FOUNTAINS' ABBEY, X The most exact and cultivated taste could scarcely have suggested sites more susceptible of improvement and deco- ration than those generally selected for monastic establish- ments. The remark is common, and its propriety amply illustrated by the subject now before us. In a secluded dell, watered by a translucid stream, and surrounded by the pleasing assemblage of rocks, wood, and picturesque varieties of surface, appear the proud vestiges of Fountains' Abbey. These magnificent remains exhibit a captivating memorial of the profound skill of architects who flourished during the darkness and superstition that enveloped our western world ; and dark and unlettered indeed must have been the age in which they exerted their unrivalled talents, otherwise their names would have been transmitted to the latest period of time. True it is there have been handed down to us notices M 78 of eminent and titled ecclesiastics as designers and directors in the erection of many a splendid pile : but when we call to remembrance who were the historians of those times, we ought to express no wonder if such authors have concealed the merits of the laity beneath the broad mantle of the church : the names of no laymen occur at. present to our recollection as engaged in these works, excepting by liberal contributions, or a surrender of their entire possessions, to the utter destitution of their families. Let us inquire " when these extraordinary specimens of architectural skill, rivalling in their execution and surpassing in sublimity the proudest structures of Athens and Rome, were erected. They were built when but few even of the clergy could read, when nobles lay upon straw, and thought a fresh supply once a week a great luxury, when raonarchs travelled on horseback, and when they met, wrestled with each other for the amusement of their courtiers ; then it was, that architects, whose names have not reached us, raised build- ings almost to the clouds with stones, most of which they might have carried under their arms. Rude men applied the principles of arcuation, of thrust, and of pressure, to an extent that would have made Wren, and Jones, tremble. Men ignorant of metaphysical theories so blended forms and magnitudes, light and shade, as to produce the artificial infinite and the real sublime. Men who lived in the grossest superstition erected temples for the worship of God, which seem intended to rival in durability the earth on which they / 79 stand, and which, after the lapse of ages, are still unequal- led, not only in point of magnificence of structure, but in their tendency to dilate the mind and to leave upon the soul the most deep and solemn impressions. This is an anomaly in the history of the fine arts which has never been adequately explained ;" and it is further remarkable, that, with all the boasted light and intelligence of the present day, our architects felicitate themselves when they are fortunate enough to produce any thing that may bear a comparison with the past. But ueturning to our more immediate subject, we take a survey of Fountains' Abbey, as left by the desolating hand of Henry VIII. This monastery, however, seems to have been visited by a dilapidation more mitigated than was the fate of other similar establishments, and having been stript of its roof and some of its minor walls, the majestic tower was abandoned, together with the greater part of the church, to await the tardy ravages of time. By several of the late proprietors, (and especially the present owner,) measures have been adopted to secure the buildings from wanton spoliation, and, so far as possible, from further decay. Fountains' Abbey is part of the Studley estate, which comprises a very considerable domain, not exceeding, at its nearest point, two miles from the town of Ripon, and is at the distance of about ten miles from Harrogate. Passing through the park, before the Abbey grounds are entered, an extensive lake presents itself, supplied from the canal within m 2 80 by a wide cascade, having at each of its extremities a small pavilion, one of which is called the Canal-House. The site of the Abbey being entirely enclosed, it can only be seen by application to the guides at this place, some of whom are always in attendance, to conduct visitors to the precincts of the Abbey, and through the grounds, which afford a circuitous walk of nearly three miles. " tread with awe these favour'd bowers, Nor wound the shrubs, nor bruise the flow'rs ; So may your path with sweets abound, So may your couch with rest be crown'd ; But harm betide the wayward swain Who dares these hallow'd haunts profane." Having entered the enclosure, a path presents itself con- ducting to the Bath-House, which is the first subject of notice. This path is finely wooded; here are Sycamores of amazing growth and the most luxuriant foliage ; likewise, the Cypress, the llax, and the Bay. Two trees, one of them a Fir and the other a Pine, claim more than ordinary atten- tion : — they stand near the entrance ; the former rises to the height of one hundred and sixteen feet, perfectly straight to its summit. The Fir tree is one hundred and fourteen feet in height ; both of them standing upon the lawn, are seen in all their gigantic dimensions and verdant beauty. The Pine casts its leafy arms so far around that it appears more 81 like a grove than a single tree. Near these noble sons of the forest is a hill completely covered with Laurel, which is closely shorn, and presents an unusual breadth of brilliant evergreen. The walks being kept in admirable order throughout, give additional charm to the varying scene. The Bath, which consists of two apartments, is constantly supplied from a spring of excellent water. Descending, at a short interval is the Rustic Bridge, under which flows, with considerable force, the river Skell. Proceeding along this delightful walk, the next object is the Temple of Piety : within it are busts of Nero, Titus, and Vespasian, with a bas relief of the Grecian Daughter. This Temple has a portico resting on Tuscan columns : in front is the lawn, where the water is fancifully divided into lakes of different size and shape, adorned by statues, among which are Roman wrestlers, a dying Gladiator, Bacchus, and Neptune. The prospect hence is partly obstructed by the foliage of stately trees. " Here groves arrang'd in various order rise, And bend their quivering summits to the skies ; The regal oak, high o'er the circling shade, Exalts the hoary honours of his head ; The spreading ash a different green displays, And the smooth asp in soothing whispers plays ; The fir, that blooms in spring's eternal prime, The spiry poplar, and the stately lime. Here moss-clad walks, there lawns of lively green, United form one nicely-varying scene. 82 The varying scene still charms the attentive sight, Or brown with shades, or opening into light." Rising again from this enchanting valley, the Octagon Tower appears. From the eminence on which it stands may be seen Mackershaw, (which is also part of the estate,) with its wood, the Chinese Temple, the Temple of Fame, and a great variety of other objects which adorn the park. In the grounds are domesticated many ornamental birds, — the pea- cock of gay and glittering plumage, and the swan of grace- ful figure and snowy whiteness ; the slender heron is like- wise frequently seen on his daring flight, while the ear is regaled by the wild and varied melody of the woods. " Here the gay tenants of the tuneful grove Harmonious breathe the raptures of their love ; Each warbler sweet that hails the genial spring- Tunes the glad song and plies the expanded wing ; The love-suggested notes, in varied strains, Fly round the vocal hills and listening plains ; The vocal hills and listening plains prolong, In varied strains, the love-suggested song." In different directions, openings are made, in order to admit the picturesque prospects which a diversity of hill, dale, and water produces. The principal of these openings is from Anne Boleyn's seat ; the guide, who precedes the company by a few paces, throws open a pair of folding- doors, and then it is that, for the first time, 83 FOUNTAINS' ABBEY a bursts upon the astonished sight, in all its venerable magni- ficence, and with all its concomitant beauties. This view shows the east end of the church and the great tower, with the river pursuing its meandering course from the Abbey- walls, till it reaches the lake below. A wooded and richly- variegated knoll forms the centre of the picture, and the whole is terminated by distant land on the left, and on the right by the trees of the park. The descent toward the margin of the water is by a winding path, through an umbrageous glen, " Whence the scared owl, on pinions gray, Breaks through the rustling houghs, And down the lone vale sails away To more profound repose." The walk continues a considerable distance along the banks of the river ; at each step the most charming prospects are disclosed, its opposite side being composed of an intermix- ture of wood and finely-tinted rocks; the scenery is occasion- ally enlivened by elegant parties returning from the Abbey. Advancing toward the building, the a Plate I. 84 EAST VIEW may be observed with advantage. The east and south sides of the tower are here conspicuous, with the Lady Chapel and its noble window. From the year 1443 to 1537, an hiatus occurs in the registry of the buildings, so that by whom the tower was erected is not certainly known, although there is good reason to suppose that it was the work of John Darneton, who was elected to the abbacy in 1479: its general appearance is exceedingly bold and massive, striking the eye, however, as a grand outline, rather than as a specimen of finished workmanship. Its height is about one hundred feet, the square measurement twenty-four feet ; it is embattled, and has four tiers of lights ; the angles are secured by double abutments, surmounted by pinnacles attached to the top of the tower by slender wings; the mouldings around it contain Latin inscriptions, in the old English character. On the East Side, BettfUtftto ft raritaa tx saotnitia ct gratiarum actio tumor. £oli bto too ijonor et glta in erla sclor b Plate II. c See Frontispiece. SuA a fy Lenpman.Rees & 4uvt C'fe&- Lff/uten TS&frwtl/Zm&utfa arid TLxnfda&Sjfon,. 85 West Side, ISegi autem eeeulorum tmmortali tttDieititU coli Dro tJju tpo fjonor et glia in scla srlor North Side, <£t toil tu^ rt fortttuDo Deo nostra in gecula geeulorum amen, ^oh Deo i!ju ruo fjonor et glta in sela srto. South Side, ~oh Deo fjonor et gloria in seeula errulorum amen. The erection of the tower seems to have given rise to various alterations in the church. Some of the early English windows that existed in the Lady Chapel, appear to have been exchanged for the large perpendicular one now at its east end ; the wall being considerably endangered by so large an aperture, an additional buttress was erected on each side, which is evident by indications of their insertion into the original work. On these buttresses were pinnacles like those on the tower ; one of them is yet standing. Con- tinuing the walk towards the Abbey, remains of its out- buildings are seen scattered about the way ; these hoary fragments are partly overgrown, and have a picturesque appearance. The church is generally entered by the south door of the N 86 Lady Chapel. Having completed the protracted ramble through the grounds, where Nature revels in beauty and luxuriance, this work of art is peculiarly striking ; strangers often view it for some moments in silent astonishment. Dayes, an artist of celebrity, visited the Abbey in 1803, and contemplated the scene with professional enthusiasm. " To feel is to be alive ; he only can be said truly to live who is capable of enjoying the beauties of creation. Here the admirer of nature will receive a high treatfrom elegantly-formed woods, sinking into deep glens, decorative buildings, in various ap- propriate situations, a fine canal of water to add a grace, and withal one of the most grand and highly-picturesque ruins in the kingdom. It rises in solemn majesty above the surround- ing scenery, with the stately port of a giant. For myself, I appeared to tread on enchanted ground, the mind being kept on the stretch by a display of new beauties, whichever way I glanced my eye. Retire to a respectful distance, ye dull phlegmatic worldlings ! this spot is sacred to the arts ; profane it not with unhallowed feet. He who is not an enthusiast towards such scenes as these, may be said to be dead to the finest feelings bestowed on man by a bountiful Creator. Let such frigid mortals as can view this place with apathy seek for languid pleasures in the artificial amusements of a theatre, or, turning their eyes from the great orb of day, retire to prattle in the illuminated and crowded walks of a public garden. PuA^iy Lenpmeoutfees Stfe. and Cl^Ut- Le rutin.. TS&*£teen/asn6ridfc. and TCanfdeUe&drar 87 " Hence, avaunt ! 'tis holy ground, Comus, and his midnight crew, And Ignorance, with looks profound, And dreaming Sloth, of pallid hue ; Mad Sedition's cry profane, And Servitude that hugs her chain ; Nor, in these consecrated bowers, Let painted Flattery hide her serpent-train in flowers ; Nor Envy base, nor creeping Gain, Dare the Muses' walk to stain ; While bright-eyed Science watches round, Hence, away! 'tis holy ground." Here is ample scope for the moralist ; let him behold here the perishable works of man. Bat Thou, Almighty Creator of the Universe, thy works flourish for ever." Strong must have been the inspiration induced by a sight of this ruined fane, to wring such reflexions from the sceptical mind of Edward Dayes. THE LADY CHAPEL/ Immediately on entering by the south door, the two lofty octangular pillars are seen with admirable effect. The view is taken from the north end. Formerly, a slender marble column was attached to each angle of these noble pillars, d Plate III. N 2 88 the capitals are yet entire, as are also the arches above them. The Chapel was originally decorated all around by elegant trefoil arches, supported by marble columns ; under the eastern window the ancient work has been removed, (traces of it being still visible,) and a slight encroachment made upon the interior, for the purpose of forming a gallery, which is ascended by a few steps at each end, and affords a compre- hensive prospect of the Church. The original arched work is imitated round the projection with much success ; this alter- ation was made by the grandfather of the present owner. On each side of the east window are three lesser ones of the lancet form, and immediately above these are others of yet smaller dimensions. The Lady Chapel projects beyond the body of the church in the manner of a transept, and in the projection is well lighted towards the west. The north and south ends have each three lancet-shaped windows, and above them one of much larger size, which, like the great east window, is of the perpendicular character. In the latter, indications of the transum still remain. From north to south the Lady Chapel measures one hundred and thirty-one feet ; its breadth is thirty-seven feet. At the south end is a piscina, which, from its elegant construction, is worthy the attention of the curious. Nine altars were erected here by the Abbot John de Cancia, about the year 1240 ; he likewise paved the Chapel with variegated marble, and ornamented it with the marble columns before-mentioned. 89 THE CHOIR AND NAVE, FROM THE EAST WINDOW/ being the whole perspective of the Church, measure three hundred and fifty-eight feet in length ; the breadth is sixty- six feet. Language can only convey a very inadequate description of the fascinating group which presents itself from the gallery of the Lady Chapel. Massive piers, boldly projecting walls, mutilated columns, with arches of different size and shape, appear in all the fantastic forms which time has been impressing from age to age ; Nature, likewise, has not withheld her beauties ; evergreens and creepers cling to the weather-tinted walls in broad and variegated masses, and develope inimitable models of light and shade. These ivyed pillars and mutilated arches loudly proclaim the vicissitudes of human things, and, viewed in connexion with the romantic scenery that surrounds them, are almost unrivalled in solemnity and beauty. " No more these hoary wilds and dark'ning groves To vocal bands return the note of praise, Whose chiefs, as slow the long procession moves, On the rear'd cross with adoration gaze. e Plate IV. 90 Mute is the matin-bell whose early call Warn'd the grey fathers from their humble beds ; No midnight taper gleams along the walls, Or round the sculptur'd saint its radiance sheds. No martyr's shrine its high-wrought gold displays, To bid the wandering zealot hither roam ; No relic here the pilgrim's toil o'erpays, And cheers his footsteps to a distant home." The rich melody of the loud-pealing organ has ceased, together with the vocal harmony of the precentor and his choral band. This ample space, once enlivened by the long- drawn procession, is now a silent empty void. Yet often, with retrospective eye, the solitary visitant may contemplate the splendid and busy scenes of former times. Fancy may conjure the long-departed manes of abbots, priors, monks, and all the great officers of their house to re- appear, as on some grand commemorative day ; then see the potent mitred lord, with gem-studded crosier, and the ensign of his Christian faith borne on high, followed by a train of white- robed, black-hooded, and woollen-girt monks glide through the roofless and shattered nave, in all the pomp of Rome. Imagination, still alert, accompanies the disarrayed and weary troop to the well-provided refectory, where, in silence, they range along the festive board ; the almoner dispenses the remnants of the feast, and vespers conclude the eventful day. 91 The delusive reverie continues ; retiring- monks crowd to the dormitory, their wonted place of rest, where a bed of straw receives them, and they recline in their cowls and tunics till midnight prayer. Distant voices are heard ; female elegance and beauty enter the choir; the lively groups dissi- pate the vision, and recal the memory to the more genial habits of present times. THE CHOIR/ which has the two eastern arches of its aisles entire, is ninety- two feet nine inches in length. Across the Lady Chapel appear the great east window and the gallery beneath it, with a pleasing view of the wood in the distance. Above the arches belonging to the aisles are staircases which con- ducted to the roof of the building, probably from passages in front of the clerestory windows. The small trefoil arches, so beautiful, and of such frequent occurrence, in the early English style, were carried along the aisles of the Choir, and, doubtless, wholly or in part decorated the Choir itself, the springers of such arches being still visible in the only clustered columns now standing eastward. The Choir was divided from its aisles by five pointed arches on each side; the aisles were lighted by lancet-headed windows; these have f Plate V. 92 small collateral arches of peculiar construction, which merit attentive observation. The altar was raised upon two broad steps, composed of burnt tiles, fancifully disposed, in lozenge, square, and zig-zag shapes. 8 Within the Choir, beneath the pavement, on the north side, is a stone coffin, 1 ' said to have contained the remains of Lord Richard, the fifth Baron de Percy. There is no appearance that a central tower ever existed, as the termination of the Choir on the south-west is by a massive pier, unadorned, strengthened by a large buttress of very rude workmanship, and apparently of subsequent date. The whole is covered with ivy ; the opposite pier is entirely demolished. From the end of the south transept may be viewed the noble ENTRANCE TO THE TOWER, through which is seen its lower north window ; the arch on the left belongs to the nave ; beyond it appears a window of the aisle ; this being of the perpendicular style, unlike the generality of those on the north side of the nave, was pro- bably inserted at the time of erecting the tower, and when the south windows of the nave, which are all perpendicular, were altered. The great arch of entrance having been s This pavement occupies the foreground of Plate IV. h Seen in Plate IV. 1 Plate VI. v Fitt* by Longman Bei>a$ He dFonttfm*. Over the Chapter-House were the Library and Scriptorium. o 2 «6 " Here hoary Time Sits on his throne of ruins, while the wind Sweeps o'er his various lyre ; how musical, How sweet the diapason ! Melancholy Spreads o'er the soul her mood, that kindly mood That calms the thought, and lifts it to the skies." Over the richly-varied vestiges of the Chapter-House is a prospect of the SOUTH TRANSEPT AND TOWER. m The southern wall of the Transept has two circular win- dows entire, and below them other windows of Norman construction. The insertion of the roofs of buildings that formerly adjoined may be traced in the walls, with chimneys and staircases for the different stories. The ruins seen in the foreground of Plate IX. are at the south-east extremity of the Abbey, and were probably part of the Abbot's resi- dence. According to Burton's plan, they extended about twenty-five feet further southward than the present wall. Four thick shafts are standing along what appears to have been the area of an apartment ; these have corbels opposite to them in the wall. The roof seems to have been low originally ; but this effect is occasioned in part by rubbish m Plate IX. Eu&* by Longman- fists kicwd C Ttdt. £ondcn-TSesv , sns0n,£ambHst$e and T f.s*siadaie tf-Mm 97 (now levelled) which had accumulated on the floor. Above were lodging-rooms, indications of which are visible in the walls. The curious may observe here two mutilated figures, probably monumental. Through the round arch on the left is seen part of the quadrangular court. The walls being overgrown in almost every part, give uncommon richness and beauty to this view. A modern author has made observa- tions so appropriate to similar scenery that we need make no apology for inserting them. " We all seem to love the ivy more than any other uncultivated evergreen that we possess ; yet it is difficult satisfactorily to answer why we have this regard for it. As a lover of the lone, the ivy-mantled ruin, I have often questioned with myself the cause and basis of my regard for that which was but a fragment of what might have been formerly splendid, and intrinsically possessed but little to engage admiration, yet, wreathed in the verdure of the ivy, was admired ; but was never satisfied, perhaps unwilling to admit the answer that my mind seemed to give. The ivy is a dependent plant, and delights in waste and ruin. We do not often tolerate its growth when the building is in repair and perfect ; but, if time dilapidate the edifice, the ivy takes possession of the fragment, and we call it beautiful ; it adorns the castle, but is an indispensable requisite to the remains of the monastic pile. A ruin once interested me greatly. The design of revisiting and drawing- it was expressed at the time. A few days only elapsed, but the inhabitant of a neighbouring cottage had most kindly 98 laboured hard in the interval and pulled down " all the nasty ivy, that the gentleman might see the ruin." He did see it, but every charm had departed. This instance, from many that might be advanced, manifests that ivy most frequently gives to these ancient edifices the idea of beauty, and con- tributes chiefly to influence our feeliugs when viewing them. The ruins of a fortress or warlike tower may often historically interest us from the renown of its founder or its possessor, some scene transacted, some villain punished, hero trium- phant, or cause promoted to which we wished success : but the quiet, secluded monastic cell or chapel has no tale to tell; history hardly stays to note even its founder's name, and all the rest is doubt and darkness ; yet, shrouded in its ivyed folds, we reverence the remains, we call it picturesque. We do not regard this ivy as a relic of ancient days, for it did not hang around the building in old time, but is compara- tively a modern upstart, a sharer of monastic spoils, a usurper of that which has been abandoned by another. The tendril, pendant from the orient window, lightly defined in the ray which it excludes, twining with graceful ease around some slender shaft, or woven amid the tracery of the florid arch, is elegantly ornamental, and gives embellishment to beauty ; but the main body of the ivy is dark, sombre, mas- sive ; yet, strip it from the pile, and we call it sacrilege ; the interest of the whole is at an end, the effect ceases. Yet what did the ivy effect? What has departed with it ? This evanescent charm perhaps consists in the obscurity, in the e 100 originally by a row of pillars along the centre ; the springers of arches are still visible on the north and south walls ; within the Refectory may be seen twenty-five lancet-headed win- dows. The corbels throughout are ingeniously varied, and sculptured in a bold and masterly style. On the west side is a circular-headed doorway, which leads by a flight of steps to a recess above ; from this place the Scriptures were read to the monks during the time of meals. In the south- east corner of the apartment stands a majestic tree, which was probably growing there soon after the demolition of the buildings. On the east side of the Refectory is the kitchen, remarkable for its fire-places, measuring sixteen feet four inches in width, and in depth six feet. Over the kitchen is a spacious room, lighted at both ends by lancet-headed windows ; like the kitchen beneath, it has an octangular shaft without a capital, from which spring the ribs support- ing the roof. " Who that had seen the Abbot in his power, Lord of a palace and a rich domain, Had thought that time would bring a blighting hour, And prove that all his honours bloom'd in vain. Oh ! what is man, even in his brightest day, An insect, whom the summer sun gives birth, To bask and perish in the solar ray, Then sink again into his kindred earth." On the west side of the Refectory is a small apartment, called the Locutorium. v 101 THE QUADRANGULAR COURT." The view from this point exhibits the entrance to the Refectory, a bold receding arch, the mouldings of which are in fine preservation ; the pillars, with the exception of the two inner ones, have been removed, but the capitals remain. On each side of this entrance are pointed and round arches, formerly supported by short piers; the whole design is extremely symmetrical and elegant. In the distance is seen part of the eastern side of the Quad- rangular Court, which has three beautiful circular entrances to the Chapter-House, besides the two round arches repre- sented in the plate ; the largest of the latter-named arches leads through a groined passage to the east end of the church. There is every appearance of a covered way having formerly led from the eastern part of the nave of the church, along at least the eastern and southern sides of the court, securing entrances to the chapter-house, abbot's residence, kitchen, refectory, and cloister. The area is one hundred and twenty-six feet square, and is adorned like a garden with trees and shrubs. THE CLOISTER." This spacious vaulting has a most imposing effect, being two hundred and seventy feet in length, and forty-two in r Plate XI. * Plate XII. P 102 breadth ; it is divided in the middle by nineteen shafts, pre- senting two ranges of bold pointed arches ; the north end being without lights, the perspective lengthens into deep and solemn obscurity. The west side has an opening between each of the arches. About midway on this side is the ancient porter's lodge, over which is a flight of steps leading to the dormitory. Southward of the lodge, the windows of the cloisters on both sides are pointed, those northward are circular-headed. The groining of the roof rests upon cor- bels; some of these are of elegant design and carefully finished. The river Skell passes under the south end of the cloister. In November, 1822, several of the arches fell in ; this circumstance was occasioned by the accumulation of earth and vegetation above; the dilapidation was immediately repaired, and so uniformly with the ancient work that no difference is discernible. Westward of the south end of the Cloister is a building, divided in the middle by a thick wall; the southern division appears to have been floored ; both the chambers are unroofed. Still more westward are the remains of a gateway, having over it three windows, and behind it the springer of an arch which attached it to other erections ; some mutilated walls still remain ; these being at the south end of the Cloister, the water passes beneath them, as may be seen by referring to the ground-plan of the Abbey build- ings. Burton conjectures these remains to be part of a chapel for the poor. i 103 THE ABBEY, FROM THE SOUTH WEST/ The westentrance to the church is through a circular-headed door, having- three columns on each side. Above the great west window is a niche, beneath which is a bird, rudely carved, holding a crosier, and standing upon a tun, a rebus for the founder's name (Thurstin); behind the bird is a scroll, placed horizontally, with the date 1494. This view shews the nave of the church in its full extent, with the walls of the cloister and of the dormitory ; the latter was divided into forty cells, each lighted by a narrow window. In order to preserve the cloister, the floor of the roofless dormitory has been bedded with clay, and gravelled, affording a dry and commodious promenade. In the foreground, on the right, are seen the broken walls of the eleemosynary, where the alms of the monastery were distributed. This building has a roof richly groined, part of which is still preserved ; the ribs are inserted into large piers or columns, decorated with a cluster of capitals, which are terminated by pendent shafts, about six inches long, and bevelled off into the main pillars, an elegance almost peculiar to the English style of architecture. In concluding this description of every object selected for pictorial representation, it may be observed, with respect to the general scenery of Studley, that the hand of Art, availing itself of Nature's choicest contributions, r Plate XIII. p 2 104 has here achieved one of its greatest triumphs. Wood and water, lawns of velvet smoothness and emerald hue, statues, temples, and towers, in appropriate situations, adorn this delightful valley, at the head of which stands a Gem that no wealth could purchase ; a Structure almost beyond the power of modern art to rear ; a Beauty indebted to centuries for a charm, which the mellowing hand of time alone can impart. " Adieu, ye towers ! by many an age array'd In many a tint; though crumbling and decay 'd, Ye wrecks, adieu ! that murmuring from on high, To pensive pride a dumb memento sigh ; Still may your aisles, in hoary pomp sublime, To new-born eras mark the lapse of time." CORBELS, &c. s Fig. 1. Inside view of an arch on the east side of the Lady Chapel. 2. Outside of ditto. 3. Inside view of an arch on the south end of the Lady Chapel. 4. Outside of ditto. 5. Termination of a drip-stone in the south transept. 6. Specimen of corbels in the Chapter-House. 7. A bracket under the reading-gallery in the Refectory. 8. One of the corbels in the passage leading from the Quadrangular Court to the east end of the church. 9. Representation of the Judgment of Solomon, in a panel over one of the fire-places in Fountains' Hall. • Plate XIV. 105 Fountains' Hall stands about two hundred yards west or the Abbey, and its erection against the side of a steep hill affords an immediate landing from a door in the upper part of the building. The Hall is now occupied by Mr. Morton, superintendent of the grounds. The dining-room is hung with tapestry, now much decayed and faded ; it represents Thetis o-ivino- directions to Vulcan relative to the making of Achilles' armour ; Jupiter and Ganymede ; and the Rape of Proser- pine. The chapel claims attention on account of its win- dows of stained glass. The Hall has a square embattled tower at each end, between these extends a balcony. Over the entrance are two crests, a stag's head, and an otter with a fish in its mouth ; between the crests is the motto of the Proctor family— R!EN TROVANT. GAINERAY TOVT. On an eminence, at a short distance from the Hall, stand the yew trees, under which the monks obtained shelter before the foundation of the Abbey ; one of them is twenty- seven feet in circumference, and, according to the calcula- tions of M. de Candelle, the French botanist, is nearly thirteen hundred years old ; its hollow trunk is now propped up by two younger stems, which have grown up in its centre from the dust and ruin of the parent stock. The residence of Mrs. Lawrence is in Studley-Park, and may be seen on the right, while advancing toward the Abbey- grounds. It is built in the Grecian style, and, being backed by luxuriant timber, has a pleasing and picturesque appear- ance. The hall, library, drawing-room, and parlour are of 106 large dimensions, and contain some good pictures and draw- ings. Adjoining the house is a tasteful garden, planted with a choice collection of flowers and shrubs ; here are three aviaries and a handsome greenhouse. The prospects from the house are varied and highly-gratifying, occasioned by the gently rising and declining grounds. " Here sprightly range the grove, or skim the plain, The sportive deer, a nicely-chequer'd train ; Oft near their haunt, on him who curious strays, All, throng'd abreast, in fix'd attention gaze ; Th' intruding spy suspiciously survey, Then, butting, limp along, and lightly frisk away." K. Zin/mrux- frvm the C/utrcA to J&e Quadr-aryA APPENDIX. (Page 11.) So rapid and great was the increase of the Cistertian houses, that even as early as the year 1151 no fewer than five hundred had been established. This increase drew forth an injunction from their chapter that no more should be founded. The injunction, however, was ineffectual. Before the close of the century some hundreds more were added. — Stevens's Supp. to Dugdale, vol. ii. p. 26. Rapin's Hist, of Eng. vol. i. p. 207. The Cistertian order," (says Bower) Leland de Script, vol. i. p. 235. APPENDIX. 129 1190. Serlo, the monk of this house, to whom the early part of its history is owing, has had assigned to him the following works : — Expositio in Orationem Dominicam. De Bello inter Regem Sco- tiae et Barones Angliae. Duroverni Cantiorum. De Differen- tiis Verborum. A Commentary on the Pentateuch, and other smaller pieces. k Thus might have concluded our brief list of authors, leaving a com- plete void down to the abolition of the monastery, had not a recent publication served to rescue from oblivion a member of the fraternity, whose literary production may at least gratify curiosity, even if it de- serve no higher commendation. The composition may, from internal evidence, be assigned with probability to the fourteenth century. The title given to it is, CLAVIS SciENTIiE ; OR SSreptatme'ss &muna$ of sKnatoing. By John De Wageby, Monk of Fountains' Abbey. The editor 1 to whom the publication of a series of selections from this work is owing, introduces it in the following words : — " The reader will here, for the first time, we believe, become acquainted with the name of John De Wageby, the monk of Fountains' Abbey. He is unknown both to Warton and Ritson, though the latter has collected, with indefatigable industry, the name of every writer in verse that his extensive information ena- bled him to discover. It may, therefore, be presumed, that some account of this rare volume, containing his poetical, and a portion of his prose produc- tions, will not prove unacceptable to those who feel solicitous to fill up every vacancy in the history of English poetry. The manuscript is on vellum, and consists of two hundred and ninety-six pages of poetry, and above twenty pages of prose. " Of the nature and object of the work, we shall allow the author himself to speak. After an invocation to the three Persons of the Holy Trinity, imploring their divine assistance, he proceeds, — k Bale, Script. Illust. Cent. II. p. 198.; Leland de Script, vol. i. p. 245. W. Jos. Walter, Esq., Translator of Chateaubriand's "Martyrs," late of St. Edmund's College, Hertfordshire. The MS. is in the collection of the late Richard Heber, Esq. 130 APPENDIX. " ' This Buke, as itself beres wyttness, In seven partys divided is. The Fyrst is to have in mynde Of the wrechednes of man's kynde ; The Secunde of the world's lyttlenes, And of the unstabell lyfe that is ; The Threde of drede of dethe bodily ; The Firth of paynes of purgatory : The Fyfte is of the day of dome, And tokens that sail befor come ; The Sext is of the paynes of helle, Whar the dampned sail evermair dwelle ; The Seventh is of the joys of hevene, Whylk are mair tha tongue can nevene.' " m Under the head of the wretchedness of man, we have these lines ; " A man that is here yhunge and lyght, Tho never so stalworthe and whight," And comly of shape, lovely and fayr, Auggeres and ruelles p will soon apayr : His strenthe and whyghtness will abate, And mak him in a full wayk state, Then changes all his fayr colour, And fayles and fades as does the flour ; For a flour that semes fayr and bright, When first it comes furthe to this lyght, Dwynes,* 1 and passes sone away, Als a shadowe on a somere's day." Under the description of the littleness of the world, the author is copious. Of various comparisons which he draws between the world and natural objects, the following will be found not unlike that which Shakspeare puts into the mouth of Wolsey on his fall : — " — For first the werlde may likened be, By skyll, aptly unto the sea, For the sea after the tydes certayn Ebbes and flowes and falles agayn. And is oft keene whit stormes that blawes, And castes aboute the mighty wawes; m Number. P Wrinkles. Active. 1 Dwindles. Agues. i APPENDIX. 131 Swa castes the werlde thurghe favowr A man to riches and to honour ; And thence agayn will cast him downe, Till povert and persecutione." Further extracts might be given ; but as their lengthened introduction here would occupy the pages to too great an extent, the following shall close the quotations from the volume, and our notices of the literary labours of the community of Fountains. The extract includes a descrip- tion of the New Jerusalem, and is taken from the seventh and last book : " This Cyte es sett on swa heghe a hyll That na synfull man may wynne thar-till, Swa clene here was never sene to syght, The whylk sail seme all of beryll bryght. All the walles are of stanes sere Sementyde with gold bryght and clere : Bot swa bryght gold and swa clene Was never nane in this werlde sene. Bot gastly r to speke, the stanes may be Gude werkes — and the gold, charite, That thai sail schyne about therin clere That does and werkes in charite here. All the turretis grete and small Sail chyne bryght als thai war of crystall. Bot thai sail be mair clere schynande Than ever was crystall in any lande. Bot gastly to speke, thai turretes mai be Sere honours that ilka man sail se. The yhates of that Cyte thar Seme as charbunkyl stanes thai war ; Bot the yhates may be gastely to say, Freedom and frenschep that sail last ay, The whylk all thos that sail be save, Withouten ende thar sail have. The ryches here pass sone away, Bot the ryches thar sail last for ay. Abouen the Cyte sail noght be sene Bot bryght bemes only, as I wene, That sail schyne from Godes face, And sprede abowt oer all that place. r Spiritually. T 132 APPENDIX. This syght is the maist joye of hevene, Als yhe herd me by-for nevene ; And altho that lyte be large and wyde, Men sail see it to the farrest syde. For als men of far landes may have syght Of the sone that we here se schyne bryght, Ryght swa the face of God Allmyghty Sail be schewede in heaven apertely. And if the blest suld that syght mysse, Thai myght noght then have perfect blysse. For yffa man war pynede in hell With mair paynes than tonge can tell, And he of Godes face myght se oghte, All his paynes suld grieve him noght." At the end of the poetry is the following colophon : — Per fratrem Joannem de Wageby, commonachum monasterii BeatjE Marine de Fontibus. SCRIPTORIS MISERI, DIGNETUR DeUS MISERERE. HUNC TOTUM FINIO: SIT LAUS ET GLORIA ChRISTO. Explicit liber qui dicitur Plains ~nrnttai\ (Page 41.) The following deed, entered into by the Abbot and Convent on this occasion, is similar to other instruments drawn up in like cases by the wary money-lenders of the 13th century. Another specimen of one of these may be seen in Tovey's Anglia Judaica, p. 124, as given by the Prior of Barnwell, A. D. 1235. " To all who shall see these present letters. Fr. D., called Abbot of Foun- tains, and the Convent of the Cistertian Order of that place, in the diocese of York, greeting in the Lord. " Know ye that we have sold and granted to Dunelm Fonte and Bernard Thedald, buying and receiving as well for themselves as for Theclan Thedald, APPENDIX. 133 brother of the said Bernard, and their other partners, citizens and merchants of Florence, sixty-two sacks of wool, of the various flocks of our monastery, without clack and lok,» god and card,* or hairy, refuse fleece ; and without the skin. Which wool we promise prepared and weighed out at our proper expense and cost, and bind ourselves to deliver it by lawful stipulation within the terms written,— viz. on the fifteenth day after the nativity of St. John the Baptist, A. D. 1277, seventeen sacks; — also on the same day in A. D. 1278, seventeen sacks; and also fourteen sacks, A. D. 1279; and fourteen other sacks on the said fifteenth day, A. D. 1280, in every such year at Clifton," to the aforesaid merchants, or one of them, or to a trusty deputy of theirs, bring- ing these letters, without further delay. For which sixty-two sacks, to be given and delivered up in the place and at the times now mentioned, the said merchants will have paid to us before our hands at London, six hundred and ninety marks and a half, good, new, and lawful monies, — thirteen shillings and four pence computed for each mark. v Of which money, in our name and in that of our monastery, we call ourselves well and truly quit and satisfied, renouncing wholly every exception touching the non-payment or non-delivery of the money to us. But if the said wool, as was said, shall not have been wholly delivered and given up to the said merchants, in the place and at the times aforesaid then we promise to them, and are bound by the aforesaid agree- ment, to refund, and render back, and restore to the same merchants, or one of them, or a trusty deputy of theirs, all expenses and losses and interest which the said merchants have paid, or incurred, for defect of rendering up and delivery or assignment of the said wool. In addition to which, credit shall be given to the said merchants, or one of them, or their deputy, by simple word only, and not by oath or other probation, — nor will we compute the said expenses, losses, and interest on the said wool, nor retain the said wool con- trary to the will of the said merchants, beyond the aforesaid terms, under pretext of our refunding the said expenses and losses. " For which, all and each aforesaid, to be firmly and faithfully observed and fulfilled, we bind ourselves, our church, and our successors, and all our 5 Clack— The tar-mark of the fleece. Lok, Lock — the short cuttings. ' Gode — " Gallis erat ovis vetula."— — The fleece of an aged ewe appears to be meant. Card — Matted wool. Vide Du Cange, sub voce. vol. II. pp. 310. 648: vol. III. p. 915: vol. IV. p. 264. u Near York. v From the price and the stipulations, the quality of the wool must be supposed to have been exceeding good, as the highest average value of it in the fourteenth century is stated to have been ten marks per sack of four hundred and sixty-four pounds, or three pence half- penny per pound ; a price which, as regulated by that of wheat, then and at the present time, would be nearly equal now to three shillings and sixpence per pound. — MS. in the library of Corpus Christi Coll. Camb. cod. XXXVIII. numb. 20. Anderson's Hist, of Commerce. 134 APPENDIX. goods of our church and of our successors, moveable and immoveable, present and future, ecclesiastical and secular, wherever they be found, to the said merchants and their partners. Which goods we acknowledge to hold of them in the name of a loan, w until the entire observance of the aforesaid. Renouncing in all and each of these, for ourselves, our church, and our successors, all rights, the aid of the canon and civil law, the privilege of clergy and courts of law, every custom and statute, all letters, and indulgences, and privileges, and inhibitions from the apostolic see and from the king's court, which have been obtained, and are to be obtained, — the ordinance set forth in the general council touching two days' x convention, remedy of appeals, and especially the indulgence of the apostolic see granted to the English, in which caution is given that Englishmen should not be drawn out of England to trials or causes by letters of the said see, and all other exceptions, rights and defences, per- sonal and real, which can benefit us, our church, and our successors, and injure the said merchants, or which can be objected against these premises. We agree also, in our name, and that of our successors, and of our church, on all and every the said premises, to be assembled freely in every place, and brought to trial by the aforesaid merchants, or by one of them, or their deputy. In witness of which we have set our seal to these present letters. Given at London on the eve of the feast of St. Luke the Evangelist [Oct. 17.] A. D. 1276." " And it is to be observed that the aforesaid abbot came into the king's chancery, and acknowledged all the premises in the aforesaid form. Afterwards came the aforesaid Dunelm into the king's chancery, and put in his place [on the 3d day of July y ] a merchant of Florence to receive a moiety of the said wool from the abbot and the said convent." — Extracted by Prynne from the Clause Rolls, 4 Edw. I., M 3 dorso. w Precari nomine. See Ducange under the word Precarium. * This privilege, which was an exemption from more than two days' journey from their monastery in a matter of trial, appears to have been founded on one of the constitutions of the twelfth general council of Lateran, A. D. 1215. It was first extended to this house by Pope Honorius in A. D. 1222. See page 110. J " Die Canic." — the first of the Dog-days. APPENDIX. 135 CH.3 (Page 43.) In the year 1288, Pope Nicholas IV. granted the tenths (up to that time paid into the papal treasury) to King Edw. I. for six years, for defraying the expense of an expedition to the Holy Land ; and that they might be collected to their full value, a taxation by the king's precept was begun in that year, and finished as to the province of Canterbury in 1291, and as to that of York in 1292, the whole being under the direc- tion of John de Pontissara, bishop of Winchester, and Oliver, bishop of Lincoln. The full value having been ascertained (which answered most conve- niently also for the levying of the first-fruits) — the tenths were then taken of that value. The following extracts from the Parliamentary records, containing the " Taxatio Ecclesiastica Anglice et Wallice auctoritate P. Nicholai" will show the real value of the possessions of the house, in Lincoln- shire, and in the western part of Yorkshire at that time. "Temporalia contangen' Archidiaconatus Lincoln', Stowe, Leycester,' and Roteland Lincoln Diocess'. £. s. d. P. 72 b. Anfis de Fontib* h't in\ Hoyland 13 6 8 Decanatibus 3 Manlak 2 Archidiaconatus Richemund. Bona Religiosor' Comoranc' in Archidiaconatu Richemund. P. 309 b. Abbas de Fontibj fet. 343 The Nova Taxatio took place as to some part of the province of York in 1318 [11 Edw. II.] by virtue of a royal mandate to the bishop of Carlisle, chiefly on account of the invasion of the Scots, by which the clergy of the border counties were rendered unable to pay the former tax. The title to the New Tax is as follows : — " P. 320. Tenores Rotulor' de pticulis nova taxacois bonor' snualm et tempatm Cleri Dioc' Ebor' &c. P. 329 b. Abbas de Fontib3 £100 nova tax.' 136 APPENDIX. EM (Page 44.) [19 Edw. I.] " The King to whom all these presents shall come, greeting. " The erecting of new buildings, and the repairing of those which were once well and magnificently built, but subsequently have fallen into decay, and the restoring of them to their original prosperous and happy state, are things which do not deserve to be judged of disparagingly. " On our directing our consideration to the numerous and ample possessions, and likewise to the manifold abundance of wealth with which the abbey of Fountains of the Cistertian Order, in the diocese of York, has been distinguished and endowed from the time of its foundation, and to the various good deeds and innumerable bestowals of alms and other works of piety which have been accustomed to proceed from the abbey itself of old time, and to the great poverty and lamentable depression, and miserable estate, by which it has been this long time, and is yet, deeply sunk, — we, moved by piety concerning that state of misery and calamity of the aforesaid abbey, have taken it with its lands, rents, and all possessions, and other things pertaining to the said abbey, into our special protection and patronage, and have committed to our beloved clerk, John de Berewyk, to be kept for so long as it shall please us, that abbey, and all things pertaining to the examination of our beloved in Christ the abbot and convent of the same abbey, so that all the revenues, rents, and proceeds of the lands and possessions of that abbey, after a reasonable sustenance of the said abbot and convent and their servants shall have been provided for, may be reserved for the payment of their debts and making up of their other defi- ciencies, and be applied to the same payment and making up, on the inspection of some of the more discreet of the abbey, and by the counsel and assistance of the said John, as they best may. Nor do we wish that any high sheriff, bailiff, or officer of ours, or any one else in the aforesaid abbey, or the granges per- taining to it, be lodged there, so long as it shall be in the guardianship of the aforesaid John, without the special licence of the said John. " In testimony of which, &c. " Witness the King at Norham, 1st day of June, 1291." f APPENDIX. 137 CM LIST OF ABBOTS. Contemporaries. No. Jr\. JJ UU La* Kin^s of England . Popes. Page. 1 Richard 1 132 — 1 13J ) Henry I. Innocent II. 15 Stephen 2 Richard 1139 — 1 1 4£ ! .... .... 21 3 Henry Murdach 1143—114/ Celestine II. 22 Lucius II. Eugenius III. 4 Maurice 1147—1145 .... .... 26 5 Thorald 1148 — 1 15C .... .... 27 6 Richard Fastolph 1150— 1 16£ .... .... — Henry II. Anastasius IV. Adrian IV. Alexander III. 7 Robert 1169— 117S .... .... 28 8 William 1179—1190 .... 29 Richard I. Lucius III. Urban III. Gregory VIII. Clement III. 9 Ralph Haget 1190—1203 .... • • • • 30 John Celestine III. Innocent III. 10 John of York 1203 — 1210 .... .... 32 11 John Pherd 1211 — 1220 .... .... 34 Henry III. Honorius III. 12 John de Cancia 1220—1246 .... .... 35 Gregory IX. Celestine IV. Innocent IV. 13 Stephen de Eston 1246—1252 .... .... 39 14 William de Allerton 1252—1258 .... — A 1 py n n m d ** T \f JllLAdllUtl X V • 15 Adam 1258—1259 16 Alexander 1259 — 1265 Urban IV. Clement IV. 17 Reginald 1265—1274 40 Edward I. Gregory X. 18 Peter Aling 1275—1279 Innocent V. Adrian V. John XXI. Nicholas III. 19 Nicholas 1279 42 20 Adam 1280—1284 Martin IV. 138 APPENDIX. Contemporaries. No. Abbots. [A. D.] iCings of England. Popes. Page. 21 Henry de Ottelay 1 Q A — ixyii Edward I. Martin IV. 43 Honorius IV. Nicholas IV. 22 Robert Thornton 1 OQ 1 — 1 3UU ,, , , Celestine V. Boniface VIII. 23 Richard Tn. Bishonton'l lo\) 1 — — 131 1 .... 49 Edward II. Benedict XI. Clement V. 24 William Rygton 1 O 1 1 — — 1310 .... 51 25 Walter Cokewald 10 1 0— l 33fi — 1 oov .... John XXII. 52 Edward III. Benedict XII. 26 Robert Copegyrie 1 o o c Udo- -1346 56 Clement VI. 27 Robert Monkton 1346- -1369 Innocent VI. Urban V. 28 William de Gower 1389- -1384 .... 57 Richard II. Uregory XI. Urban VI. 29 Robert Burley 1384- -1410 — Henry IV. Boniface IX. Innocent VII. Gregory XII. Alexander V. 30 XVUllCl J. I tllirv 1 A 1 A 1410- 1 A 1 K —1415 .... John XXIII. 59 Henry V. 31 John de Ripon 1415- -1435 • • < — Henry VI. Martin V. Eugenius IV. 32 Thomas Passelew 1435- -1442 • • • • .... 61 33 John Martyn 1442 . . • • .... — 34 John Grenewell 1442- -1471 .... — Edward IV. Nicholas V. Calixtus III. Pius II. Paul II. 35 TMirvmoc Swuntftn J. IIUlIluo OW VlllUIl 1/171 — 1 "± / o .... Sixtus IV. 62 36 .TnVm T^flrnpton O UI11I J-/ (xx 11L tun 1 /I 7Q — i ^yj .... Edward V. Innocent VIII. Richard III. Alexander VI. Henry VII. 37 Marmaduke Huby 1494- -1526 64 HenryVIII. Pius in.' Julius II. Leo X. Adrian VI. Clement VII. 38 William Thirske 1526 -1537 66 Paul in.' 39 Marmaduke Bradley 1537 —1539 .... 72 I APPENDIX. 139 CM (Page 41.) The following schedule of places 2 where the endowments of this rich and highly-famed institution chiefly lay, can scarcely be better intro- duced than in the words of the late able historian of Craven. " From the foot of Penigent to the boundaries of St. Wilfrid of Ripon, the estates of this wealthy house stretched without interruption. " Fountains' Fell still retains the name of its ancient possessors ; all the high pastures from thence to Kilnsey were ranged by their flocks and herds. Kilnsey and Coniston were their property ; the commons of the latter joined upon Netherdale ; and all this valley {iota Nidderdale a are the sweeping words of Mowbray's charter,) had been early bestowed upon them, down to Brimham, which touched upon the immediate demesnes of the house." The lands in Craven " contained in a ring fence, upon a very moderate com- putation, 100 square miles, or 64,000 acres." b We may sum up this short, but elegant description, by stating, that to this large domain there may be safely added not fewer than 8,000 acres more, dispersed through other parts of the county, and in the counties adjoining ; making an aggregate of 72,000 acres, including various manors, besides about 350 messuages, inferior dwelling-houses, mills, and other similar appendants to these wide and extensive possessions. In a few cases, difficulty in determining the exact place has occurred, partly from the mutations to which proper names are liable through a lapse of centuries, and partly from the circumstance of two or more places of the same name being sometimes found in the respective districts in which the property was held ; but general accuracy can be vouched for. The original orthography has been as much as possible preserved, as a matter both of curiosity and use. Figures of reference to the names of the numerous benefactors speci- fied in the preceding pages, are given to the utmost extent they could be ascertained ; and by them the grantors and the grants may be brought together, and seen at once. z Extracted mostly from the Monasticon Anglicanum of Dugdale, the Monasticon Ebo- racense of Burton, the Valor Ecclesiasticus, and other similar sources. 11 All of Nidderdale that was the property of Roger de Mowbray, and that appears to have been all the east part. Dugdale's Monast. vol. i. p. 756. b Whitaker's Craven, pp. 202, 454. U 140 APPENDIX. YORKSHIRE. Townsliips, Sfc. Abulay grange. Acaster (Malbis) Acclam. Ainderby (Quern- how). Aismunderby. Aistenby [Asenby] Aldeburgh (a grange of the monastery) Aldewark. Aldfield. Almare(fisheryinthe river Aller). Alverstain or Alves ton. Alvescage. Appletreewick. Arneclive[Arncliffe] Arneforde[Arnforth] Awndelay. Awstwyk[Austwick] Ayrton. Azerlay. Balderby [Balders- by]- Baystenbrek or Ba- kesteinberg. Bewerley. Birkhou[Birkhouse Nowextinct. It was in the township of Baldersby. Birkhouse. Birkwith Blakhou[Blakehow] Blatenker. Bollershaw (a lodge of the monastery) Bordley. Borou . 2 12 gilt in midward, 12 oz 4s. id. J A manse for small shrine! with a rib of St. Lawrence, of silver ") gilt, 44 oz ' " ' • 4s. 4a. 3 A manse for Corpus Christi day, silver and gilt, 106 oz 4s. id. . 22 19 4 A holy-water Fatt, with a strinkil [sprinkler] of silver, ungilt, ~l 53 oz 8s.2d.y' 8 7 10 A mitre of silver, gilt, and set with pearl and stone, 70 oz. . .is. id. . 15 3 4 A ring and buckle, silvered and gilt, set with pearls and stones, "l 4 oz 4s. id. j An image of St. James, of silver, and gilt, 64 oz 4s. id. .13 17 4 A cross, silvered and gilt, 1 oz 4 4 A grype-schill, h with a covering, gilt, 37 oz 3s. 8d. . 6 15 8 f The thurible appears to be meant. £ Cruche : crook — a crosier. h This seems to be a flagon ; schill or skeel (derived from the French escuelle) being a northern provincialism for pail. The word may be rendered hand-skeel — a skeel which may be griped or grasped by the hand, or that has a handle to it. APPENDIX. 155 A cross of gold, set with stones, wherein is part of the holy cross, "> 14 oz . £2. 3s. Od. J A jewel of silver, and gilt, with a byrel, 9|oz 4*. 4c?.. . A cross, with a stone, of silver, and gilt, 20^oz 4s. Ad. . . A jewel, with a byrel, of silver, and gilt, 6£oz 4s. 4c?. . . A foot of a cross, silvered and gilt, 9£oz 4s. 4c?.. . A jewel, with a byrrel and relict of silver, and gilt, 5oz.. . . 4s. 4c?. . . A box of silver, gilt within, beads gilt, 2|oz 4s. id.. . An image of our Lady, in a case of silver, and gilt, 4|oz . . 4s. 4c?. . . Two small jewels bound with bands of silver. The silver 3oz. 3s. 2d. . A little cross of silver, and gilt, 5\oz 4s. 4c?. . . A bruche of silver, gilt, 3f oz 4s. 4c?. . . Two pots of white, silvered, 6oz 3s. 2c?. . . Two great chrystal stones Two crewets of silver, gilt, lC|oz ,4s. id... A silver chalice, well gilt, 29oz 4s. 6d.. . A pateyn for the said chalice, of silver, gilt, 9|oz 4s. 4c?. . . A pair of selors, ' of silver, gilt, 108oz 4s. 4c?.. . An image of our Lady, of silver, gilt, 104oz 4s. 4c?.. . A silver cross, gilt, set with stones, 120oz 4s. 4c?. . . A head of a cruche of silver, gilt, lOOoz 4s. 4c?. . . The stafFof the cruche, gilt, 70oz 4s. 4c?.. . Two corpas [corporas] caps of cloth of gold A table for the high altar on principal days, with three images of silver, gilt, with beads and plate of silver, and some ^ . . 90 parts of gold, set with stones, valued at £90 or £94. £. fa d. 30 2 2 1 2 4 8 10 1 8 2 2 1 2 1 1 8 10 10 19 6 9 6 1 3 10 15 2 19 3 11 6 6 10 6 2 1 2 23 8 22 10 8 26 21 13 4 15 3 4 } £508 14 7 IN THE CUSTODY OF THE LORD ABBOT. A basin of silver, with a flower, gilt in the front, 56|oz. . . 3s. 5d. . . 9 13 1 A basin of silver, with a front gilt in the bottom, 54|oz. . .3s. 5c?.. . 9 5 4| A pot, parcel gilt, 54oz 3s. 6d.. . 9 9 Two silver ewers, 51 oz 3s. 4c?. .. 8 10 A silver ewer, gilt about the edges, 25|oz 3s. 4c?.. . 4 4 2 Eight standing pieces and covers, gilt, 278£oz 4s. 4c?. .. 60 6 10 Four flat pieces with covers, gilt, lOl^oz ..4s. 4c?.. . 21 19 10 A goblet covered and gilt, 1 9oz 4s. 4c?. . . 4 2 4 ' Vessels for holding the salt, which, after being blessed, was mixed with the holy water. — Gavantus, Thesaurus Sac. Rit. vol. i. p. 303. Z 156 APPENDIX. £. s. d. 2 12 A flat piece and cover, not gilt, 48oz . 4 3s. 5 J. . . 8 4 A flat piece, the edges and front gilt, 16^oz. ..3s. 6c?.. . 2 17 9 A flat piece, skargells, k gilt on the front and edges, 16oz . . 3s. 6d. . . 2 16 1 10 4 5 iii 1 18 H 1 1 8 A chalice with the pateyn of silver, and gilt, 29oz ..4s. Ad... 6 5 8 2 7 8 £157 10 tvt THP RITTTPRY A standino 1 nott ^ with a rnvpv crilf" 24oz . . . . .As. 4c?.. . 5 4 2 16 4 2 16 4 1 3 2 1 14 8 4 19 2 12 3 8 18 £30 8 9 IN THE FRATER. .£3 3 4 THE PLATE AT BRIMBEM [BRIMHAM]. 1 16 8 One goblet, with a covering of silver, and gilt, ll|oz. . . ...4s. 4c?... 2 9 10 1 7 6 1 10 10 £7 4 10 * The sum of all the plate, &c. amounts to £708 5 91 * Or, more correctly, £707 1*. 7f d., exclusive of the value of the two articles left blank in the list of the church plate. k The Editor has not been able to find any glossary, English or foreign, which contains this word. He ventures an opinion that it may have been incorrectly transcribed by Dr. Burton. The nearest approach to it is the French word escarcelle, for which see Du Cange under the word scarcella. ' Probably a cooler. See Cotgrave's Dictionary under the words nou and noiiet. / APPENDIX. 157 THE STORES (STAURI) OF THE MONASTERY OF FOUNTAINS. Bulls 49 Bovets, or young steers 151} Oxen 536 Boviculae, or young whys m . ... 142 f T Cows 738 Stirketts m 242 f Aota1 ' ~"" b ' 347 J Heifers 151 Calves STATE OF THE SHEEP. Hurt:" [rams] 50 Oves, or ewes 535 7

Total, 79. Porci 18 ) OF THE DEMAINS OF THE MONASTERY. WHEAT. Qrs. Qrs.~% At Morkar 36 At Swanlay 10 > Total, 117. At Haddokstaynes 35 At Sutton 36 J IN RYE. At Brymbem 9 At Sutton Total, 12. IN OATS. Qrs. Qrs. At Morkar 30 At Sutton 40 v Tota j At Haddokstaynes < 24 At Brymbem 20 ( At Swanlay 20 ^ Total, Loads. At Morkar 60 At Sutton At Haddokstaynes 40 At the monastery in the park At Swanlay 12 At Brymbem IN HAY. Loads. ~\ an f Total, 392. Loads. ~\ ... 20f, i ..160f ...lOOJ m Whys, stirketts — provincialisms signifying cattle from one and a half to two years old — the former female, the latter male. a See Junius's Etymologicum, under the words hurt and ram. 158 APPENDIX. IN THE GRANARIES. Qrs. Qrs. "1 In wheat 18 In barley malt 90 > Total, 128. In rye 18 In oats 2) (Page 73.) [From a Pension Book temp. Hen. VIII. in the Augmentation Office.] FOUNTAUNCE, LATE A MONASTERY IN THE ARCHDEACONRY OF RICHMOND. Pensions lately assigned to the Abbot and convent of the same on the dissolution of the said late monastery, by Commissioners of the Lord the King, on the 28th day of the month of November, in the 31st year of the aforesaid Lord, King Hen. VIII. 6 13 Marmaduke Bradley, Abbot £. s. Laurence Benne .... Richard Norreys .... Richard Hebden .... Thomas Smekergill . Robert Clyffton ... Robert Brodebelte... John Tewisdaye ... John Melsonbye ... Gawin Byrtletsone . , William Dunewell . . Thomas Tutylle ... Thomas Grenewod . William Garford ... Cristofer Lighton . . . Edmund Aland .... £. 100 d. £. Priests. 13 4 each. 6 Priests. Oeach. 0. — Thomas Kydde, Prior 8 £. William Hobson ^ Thomas Dykenson John Hooton John Young Cristofer Jeynkynson . , Marmaduke Jeynkynson Thomas Browne Robert Caldbek ....... Anthony Kendall Gawin Storke , Edmund Lowde , Matthew Morland .... Robert Dodgeson Henry Jakeson John Walworth Total £277 d. 0. i. d. Priests. 6 8 each. Priests. each. 6 8. Walter Hendle. Thomas Legh. Richard Belassys. R. Watkyns. THE END. METCALFE, PRINTER, CAMBRIDGE.