I' >*••• /.U » THE DOMESDAY BOOK KENT. < 3 —- r translation, Jiotcs, an*> Slpprnbtjc. i '?r* v THE EEV. LAMBERT BLACKWELL LARKING, M.A., J LATE VICAR OF RTARSH, KENT. i A 1 LONDON: JAMES TOOVEY, 177, PICCADILLY. MDCCCLXIX. INTRODUCTORY NOTICE. LAMBERT BLACKWELL LARKING, to whom the reader is indebted for this magnificent edition of the ‘Domesday oe Kext,’ was born at Clare Honse, East Mailing, on the 2nd of February, 1797. He was the eldest son of John Larking and of Dorothy, daughter of Sir Charles Style, Baronet, of Wateringbury, in the county of Kent. His mother was allied to the noble family of the Wingfields, and his ancestors on both sides had long been settled in the county, of which his father was Deputy-Lieutenant, and served the office of High Sheriff in 1808. After receiving the rudiments of his education at Parson’s Green, under the care of a Mr. Pearson, young Larking was sent to Eton as an oppidan. Here he laid the foundation of those critical habits and that refined scholarship for which he was distinguished through life. Erom Eton he removed to Brasenose College, Oxford, in 1816. In 1820 he obtained a second class in Classics, took his degree of B.A. in the same year, and that of M.A. in 1823. After a short visit to the Continent in company with Mr. Lowther, Mr. Larking returned to England, and was ordained by Archbishop Howley to the Curacy of East Peckham, near Tunbridge. By his Hector, the Eev. George Moore, Registrar of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, he was permitted to have access to the wills and muniments in Mr. Moore’s keeping. It was thus that Mr. Larking acquired that taste for Archaeological pursuits which in him amounted almost to a passion. Here also he gained that minute acquaintance with the local traditions and the genealogical history of his native county in which he was unrivalled. His researches, thus auspiciously commenced, were soon extended to other fields of inquiry. In the prosecution of his favourite study every nook and corner was duly searched,—every sculptured stone and storied window carefully examined. This is not the language of eulogy. Those who knew him well can bear witness to its literal accuracy. His application was unwearied, his patience inexhaustible. It was characteristic of him to spare no pains in whatever he undertook, to do thoroughly and completely whatever he set himself to do. To the knowledge thus acquired by his local researches was added the examination of the public muniments preserved in the national Record Office and elsewhere. No documents were too obscure, too crabbed, or too antiquated to repel his curiosity, or diminish the ardour of his pursuit. Increase of appetite grew by what it fed on; and his private papers and memoranda bear ample evidence of the wide scope of Iris inquiries, of the judgment by which they were directed, and, above all, of that conscientious desire for extreme accuracy which distinguished him alike in his literary and social converse,—in his moral as well as in his intellectual character. INTRODUCTORY NOTICE. In the year 1830 Mr. Larking was presented to the Vicarage of Ryarsh, in Kent, by his cousin, the Honourable J. Wingfield Stratford. In 1831 he married Frances, eldest daughter of Sir William Jervis Twysden, Bart., of Roydon Hall. In January 1837 he succeeded to the Vicarage of Burham, in the same county, on the nomination of Charles Milner, Esq., of Preston Hall. Shortly after his removal to Ryarsh, the Surrenden Collection of Manuscripts was submitted to Mr. Barking’s inspection by Sir Edward Dering, a lineal descendant of the Baronet of the same name who was distinguished for his learning and love of antiquarian research in the Long Parliament of Charles I. This collection, formed by Sir Edward in the seventeenth century, and consisting of ancient title-deeds and papers belonging to the Dering family, had been enriched by miscellaneous documents derived from the charter chests of Christ Church and of St. Augustine’s, Canter¬ bury, from the muniments of Cobham and of Dover Castle. Deterred from his first intention of giving to the world a complete and systematic catalogue of the Surrenden Charters, in consequence of the expense, Mr. Larking was obliged to content himself with publishing a selection from them in the Proceedings of the Kentish Archaeological Association and in the * Collectanea Topographical Similarity of pursuits procured him the acquaintance of the Rev. Thomas Streatfeild, of Westerham, who was engaged at the same time in collecting materials for a History of Kent. An intimate friendship sprang up between the two scholars, and Mr. Larking has recorded in very warm and affectionate terms the happiness he felt in Mr. Streatfeild’s companionship:— “ Our testimony,” he says, “ to his varied qualifications is founded upon our having had the happiness of being associated with him in his archaeological researches for more than a quarter of a century. Many and many a mile have we travelled with him together for the inspection of materials, and many a night have we sat up till early dawn, analysing, attesting, and noting the results of our day’s work. Thousands, literally thousands, of ancient documents have we together minutely inspected, and recorded every useful particle of their contents.”* In 1839, whilst Mr. Larking was passing the winter at Malta for the benefit of his health, he employed his leisure hours in transcribing a contemporary report of the lands held by the Knights Hospitallers in England, prepared for the Grand Master by Philip de Thame in the year 1338. This work was arranged for the press some years after, and appeared under the auspices of the Camden Society in 1857. On Mr. Barking’s return to England from Malta he took an active interest in the proceedings of the Camden Society, which had been established a few months before. His contributions to its publications, besides the Report already mentioned, consisted of a volume entitled, ‘ Proceedings in the County of Kent,’ relating chiefly to the acts of the Long Parliament, and of the Committee of Religion appointed in the year 1610. This volume, not the least valuable of Mr. Larking s publications, is no less interesting to the general historian than it is to the Kentish antiquarian. The illustrations it affords of the proceedings of Parliament against the ministers of religion in the county of Kent are extremely curious. Not less curious and interesting are the details respecting the private and public life of Sir Edward Dering, who was deemed worthy of a place in Lord Clarendon’s ‘ History of the Rebellion.’ On the 19th of September, 1857, in conjunction with Lord Falmouth and the late Marquis Camden, Mr. Larking projected the formation of an Archeological Society for the county of Kent. Of this Society he became the Honorary Secretary, and for five years he devoted himself to its interests with unabated enthusiasm. The success attending its operations is to be attributed in a great measure to his indefatigable zeal and valuable services. His contributions to the Society, marked by his initials, L. B. L., taken in a great measure from the manuscripts of the Derings, were characterized by that care and scrupulous fidelity for which he was always remarkable. The Diary of Sir Roger Twysden, published in the first four volumes of the Society’s Proceedings, may be considered as a supplement to the curious revelations contained in the papers of Sir Edward Derin"-, already mentioned. ‘ Archfeologia Cantiana/ vol. iii. p. 138. INTRODUCTORY NOTICE. vii But whilst Mr. Larking thus employed his leisure hours by occasionally contributing to the Kentish Archeo¬ logical and to other publications, it was the most cherished wish of his heart to give to the world an edition of the £ Domesday of Kent,’ worthy the importance of the subject and of the deep interest he felt in the county. lie had proposed that the work should consist of an exact Facsimile of the ancient record now preserved in the national Record Office. The Facsimile was to be followed by an Extension of the Text, by a Translation, Notes, and Illustrations. This was no easy task for a clergyman so assiduously engaged in parochial work as Mr. Larking. To one jealous as he was to a nicety lest a comma or a hairstroke should be mistaken or misplaced—to one whose punctilious exactitude often suggested doubts which on examination proved groundless the labour and anxiety thus imposed on him were immense. A slight misgiving involved the necessity of a journey to town. His judgment could be satisfied with nothing short of ocular demonstration, and that more than once repeated. He had to fear lest an error in the facsimile should reappear in the text, or from the text find its way into the Notes and dissertations, and thus prove the source of interminable confusion. To obviate this evil, to guard against the possibility of mistake, Mr. Larking spared no pains and no personal sacrifice. The result is before the reader; and it may be asserted with confidence that never has a more exact or beautiful transcript of so ancient and so difficult a document, as Domesday, been submitted to the public. Then, again, the Illustrations and Notes required for the completion of his work required the use of rare and costly works not generally to be met with except in public libraries. The obscurities in Domesday are so numerous and perplexing, opinions on disputed words and expressions so much divided, that to a man of singular diffidence and modesty like Mr. Larking the labour was as severe, as its results, in his judgment, too often appeared unsatisfactory. No one, indeed, was better fitted for such a work by his training, by his long acquaintance -with documents relating to Kent, by his wonderful local knowledge of the county. But year after year slipped away, until death surprised him at his unfinished task. The loss is, unhappily, irreparable. His place cannot be supplied. Nor is it likely that any one will be found in whom so many favourable circmnstances will again concur for editing and illustrating the earliest and most difficult record connected with Kentish history. Fortunately, at the time of his death, the greatest portion of the work had been prepared or completed, and a large portion of it was already in type. The Facsimile, the Extension, and the Notes had passed through the press; the Appendix had reached to page 8*. For the remaining portion Mr. Larking had collected various memoranda and quotations, undoubtedly intended to have been worked up into a more complete form. Some of these were jotted down on loose fragments of paper, without any notice of their mutual connection. Others consisted of little more than hints conveyed in a few disjointed words, intelligible only to their author. In this state of the work it was deemed advisable to preserve as faithfully as possible Mr. Larking’s labours in the condition in which he had left them, without any attempt to supply the deficiencies. Care has been taken to verify and correct the quotations, and, wherever a word or expression has been added, to enclose it within parentheses. This liberty has rarely been used, and never except where the condition of the manuscript rendered such additions indispensable. The Tables at the close of the volume, especially where Mr. Larking has identified the ancient with the modern Names of Places, will be esteemed of the highest value, as containing the results of his extended and careful observations. So far, therefore, those who are interested in the local history of Kent may consider themselves as especially fortunate in possessing so much valuable material for the ancient topography of the county. With the exception of a quotation from Sir F. Palgrave’s ‘ History of Normandy,’ which it has been deemed right to retain, no portion of the Preface had been committed to paper. Had his life been spared, it is probable that Mr. Larking would have given a general survey of the whole work, embodying in it the best and maturest fruits of his researches. Such a critical examination of Domesday is much to be desired, and would have been specially valuable as coming from one like Mr. Larking, who combined extensive local knowledge INTBODTJCTOBY NOTICE. viii witli unwearied industry, and great critical sagacity. But in tile absence of all memoranda upon which such a Preface should be founded, still more of any knowledge of Mr. Barking’s intentions and views, it has not been thought right to supplement the work with details and theories which, however useful, might not have accorded with Mr. Barking’s wishes or opinions. It would be unjust to conclude these remarks without some allusion to the services rendered by those who have been engaged in the typographical execution and superintendence of the work. To Mr. Smallfield, in particular, the gratitude of a11 fr! ™ds of Mr ' Larkin S is due - His lon S acquaint™ 08 with the author, and his intimate knowledge of Mr. Barking’s intentions and wishes, were of the greatest value in bringing this work to such a state of perfection as that in which it now appears. Obscure memoranda and half-expressed suggestions, unintelligible to others, were by the means of Mr. Smallfield made clear and legible. No small praise is also due to Mr. Netlierclift for his exact and beautiful Facsimile. But it may be more satisfactory to this able artist to know that Mr. Larking left a memorandum among his papers indicating the high opinion which he entertained of Mr. Netherclift’s services. In a slip of paper preserved among a number of brief memoranda, intended for the Preface, Mr. Larking writes as follows:—“ I cannot close this Preface without my tribute of thanks to Mr. Netherclift for the admirable manner in which he has executed the Pacsimile of the Becord. Por beauty, correctness, and fidelity to the original, it will fearlessly compete even with the zincographs of Sir H. James. It is no small merit that Mr. Netherclift’s transcripts were completed at least two years before Sir H. James’s scientific discoveries were made. There was no labour of competition, but the honest efforts for truth of a talented and zealous artist. Had a prize been offered to test the comparative merits of Lithography and Photography by competition, it is impossible that happier fruits could have been obtained than these two Facsimiles of Sir H. James and Mr. Netherclift. Competition the most ardent could not have effected better results than we have in these independent works. To ascribe the palm would be presumptuous in me; this is the province of the reading public. But Mr. Netherclift may feel as gratified as I am at the fruits of his labours, and fear nothing of a rival art either on the score of excellence or expense. If the number of impres¬ sions be less limited than in our case, he can produce transcripts even cheaper.” Though the work must ever want its author’s last touches and revision, and not only Mr. Barking’s friends but all who are interested in the antiquities of Kent must lament the loss of his matured researches, it is confidently anticipated that this Domesday of Kent will remain a lasting monument of the care and ability of its lamented author, and be deemed not unworthy of the favour of those who have encouraged and aided its publication. NOT E. There is no more true or graphic description of the process of the Survey than that given by Sir Francis Palgrave in his ‘ History of Normandy and England.’ “ Soon afterwards you might see in every city and good town in England, save and except the bishopric, the three northern counties, and London, a worshipful company, such, for example, as proceeded to the West,— Kemigius, Bishop of Lincoln, the founder of the Cathedral, Walter Gifford, Earl of Buckingham, Henry de Ferrars, and Adam, the brother of Eudo Dapifer. “ These Commissioners began their proceedings by holding a Court, at which, with the exception of the Diocesan, all the members of the Hundred Moot were required to attend. “ ‘ Come forward, Gerefa, Sheriff, you the Lieutenant of the Earl, you the Thanes of the Shire, you the Priests of 1 each and every Parish Church, you the Ecevcs and Villains of each and every Township,—come forward, and declare 1 upon the halidome the truth of the matters into which our Lord the King commands us to inquire, and give your answer 1 to each and every question as we ask. ‘ What is the name of your township, be it city, borough, thorp, haim, or bye? ‘ Who was the Lord thereof, Archbishop, Bishop, Abbot, Earl, or Thane, in the days of good King Edward ; ‘ for of Harold the law knows nothing ? ‘How many thanes,—how many commcndated,—how many freemen,—how many sokemen,—how many bur- ‘ gcsscs,—how many churls,—how many cottagers,—how many thralls ? ‘ How many hides of land be therein ? ‘ How many plough-lands in demesne ? ‘ How many acres of wood,—how many of meadow,—how many of pasture,—[how many mills,]*—how many ‘fisheries,—[how many pannage hogs]? ‘ How much hath been added,—how much taken away ? ‘ How much worth in good King Edward’s time,—how much when King William gave it,—and how much now ? ‘ What hath each freeman,—what each solceman,—how many oxen,—how many cows,—how many sheep,— ‘ how many swine ?’ “With some slight variation as to the points of inquiry, this valuation of land and capital was taken throughout the whole length and breadth of England, save and except the Metropolis and the four northern shires. The Commissioners made their several circuits, and the information which they collected was reduced into writing and transmitted to the King. It was afterwards methodized and abstracted, and fairly transcribed in the great volumes of Domesday, and depo¬ sited in the Eoyal Treasury at Winchester, amongst the other Muniments of the Eealm. It still exists, fresh and perfect as when the scribe put pen to parchment, the oldest cadastre, or survey of a kingdom, now existing in the world. The i> * The clauses in -brackets are not in Palgrave; they are my addition.—L. B. L. NOTE. colophon, ‘ anno millesimo ociogesimo sexto ab incarnaiione Domini , mgesimo , vei'o, regni Willelmi, facta est ista desciiptio , attests the date of the great Becord, and the diligence, as well as the skill, of those by whom it was completed. “ In the entries of the names of places the inaccuracies and corruptions show that the writers were not well acquainted with the Anglo-Saxon terminology, though, in the more familiar designations of persons, fewer errors are observed. “ The caligraphy betrays an Italian hand, and leads to the supposition that it was under the inspection and direction of the lettered Lanfranc that the work was compiled. Great force is given to this supposition from the circumstance that in Domesday wo first find those abbreviations, afterwards so common in our legal documents, but which, in fact, are derived from the Tyronian notes of the Bomans, until then unknown in England. “ The formation of this Survey occasioned universal discontent; such an inquiry had never been made before; the English considered it as an invasion almost of their natural rights. It was a shame, they said, that a King should direct such a prying into each man’s means,—a shame even to tell of such a tyranny. Yet there was more of temper than of sound reason in this discontent. With whatever acts of oppression William may be charged, in this case there was none. The danegelt, the tax of six shillings upon every plough-land, was both a lawful and a needful impost, and the first and main intent of the Survey was to make a full and fair assessment of the charge. The unsettled state of affair's during the latter years of the Confessor’s reign, the misfortunes attending the Conquest, and the transfer of land to the new proprietors, might all be sufficient causes for such investigations; but, even if the kingdom had continued in entire tranquillity, it would have been equally required. So long as the land remained untilled no danegelt was payable; but when the plough had been driven over it, then it became liable to the charge; and it is most probable that in many cases the assessment had been neglected or evaded. This, on the other hand, was counterbalanced by the lands which had become wasted by the misfortunes of the Conquest; and, whilst the Domesday Survey secured the rights of the Crown, it also ensured a fan- apportionment of the burthen amongst those by whom it was to be contributed. The inquiry was made by the royal officers and ministers; but the repartition was made by the people. The English taxed themselves.” See Palgrave, ‘History of Normandy and England,’ ed. 1864, vol. iii. pp. 573-576, ss. 10 and IT. CONTENTS. FACSIMILE—TWENTY-EIGHT PLATES. EXTENSION. CONCORDANCE. INDEX OF NAMES AND TITLES. TRANSLATION. NOTES .. APPENDIX. TABULAR VIEW OF MANORS, ALPHABETICALLY ARRANGED NAMES OF PLACES, ANCIENT AND MODERN INDEX TO HUNDREDS, MANORS, ETC., WITH REFERENCES TO HASTED CWtk * D ^^XCRK^iore pe^tf £'5 earn tnfngife/mde ppoftd 7 m^if Acctpiebarco mtme emenbazioxie- /q^uicuncp manenf lnuilU/ affibuuf. recbiebac pe^. cfuttxid.ineV cjuiecufetar Sc cbeloneo -p xnta XnajUa. ^rnf fy* ccnfuetuSt nef et^irrr ibt • ^ua-rfSo t*^»c mXm^iXuemt. jfrt i yfo ymo edduertcuei in £nof.u. fate ipfa udU eobtifta. <% tSo yau e? non yotutu cdyumn mumu uaUbarcjuanSo epSbaiocenftfta peceptr-IfRobo appoatr. ^cl.IX.-7-Tani jfyofaPmdei&LIit.l.tuu Xtfe. fum erde .£vcuii. \&> cU'benap^unt fuitjcc.in 0 ^ It,' . ’ otn/ comm u ■ • ub ahnumem. J» bouqr fuff-y&yc- mznfuyp.deCfbf npcydzt efue '-aiding. Bclufbabec iefc'menel dtictf. ^auAulp de atfbefptne. in - jtli^fecUtSi.i. ^liff (Ilf Oayn .i. life fill YedoLbi7Rotrtuf nurer. Vi. v^/ittf (Uiuf 6oiffn£i. m.mc|b|Cjsrf/ enbalta tnmornfi;u. I')uup Se motreforrr. i. doma■ %ixmn. tenor. 1. mafum. Secjiu t'iatr{^nn4mua otmtdia ftajif. luMjet'^e 0{trc(^a jmcquanda domu fop Aojua r^tf. ^’■cEnLtfc^ucufcj; cTueruSm^ "Sott? fucc ibi t'. 8 l. £. /jti imrottu pomxfSe Souefc ejl/ unu moleribin • ejet^omf pen^ naucf canfri'nept' p na^nl -cnrXaaone mans.7 maXriwu danu fa ettpe^tdbAionuniy.7non-fnrr vbt t'.R.-E. t?ocSicrt/ ViCporVrcidjet'n.. cp ipfe baujeenfis o^mcdTtCilla fieri atainculo fuo berbem? pUo loom if. infra fcnptaC U^cf r^if coonUntr'IioV do. .mi. lefhf. boo c Oonmar le{t. 7 Bjb'clefb. 7Lmuuaitlef^^k , iuuarcleft. j^i^Cfbcmr^ (eye ad fyffacu yK>orUcbef.7l>ocbe larib-yAiu BocbetanS .7-tau BodjdanS.^pefffe* .1 ■ xoyj. dc oxa.J 1. tuo 4 de Heine. Sdiildyiobcba. a cheb eue • frame. (5 fU. drmcDfie.-pim^alta ptm. Bnit^c-^rpnn^Ef. ~^onone. ht loansfoca. (bntfi^e. tprrfhd. aSuheno u p Trrni cbep (re fex bomme -y Ardneys muUcfe .yceeyta. ■C&. t YtiX & . 7 yAu^ujlintj 7 ^eviaxtm 1 ■ be cyi&y m: ruobit W- ^ laefone cjui iudi cat 9 epab l-noptc fej^xmediecatcpecumpei. trcjui^xule"|C o^irr ^rfbn^actiqd. Be -nern fj pia nominauf AinoSt^ fimilui d’.' br tufiodia .vi. dteby- apab canxnapa. uel apuS (anuutc: 7 ibi bmr Se-iX^e. dbtt7potu.Si non babueftne/fme ^foTiffeccuta yecedun. o 1 juertTTtr pmonra. uccuenuitf ab fcn^ /ibu-mr ufcp ab pirtripdenna.non Unwjiuf.frft non uenepnrydcbac pnfjaoxnay 7 SCaUi fomi^ .0- (of babebtr.^xisipra &nbyioy-cju^ .Vnr.ttb emdacf 7 be cMib, (ic fuyiuf (ctvytxL.e- " ImuuarrUfb in bfifeuuei brppc cWmdmdfcilior'. 4i • tareraf^ii. Jbcaf an^tullafTp unojnmuajwo^if ^Oara-imulrujuua^^e ^puuxnvm K ~l boefbentftpf cuftodseoa/f ye^:^ai> ourtuariA. -f/apub Santuuo p. ti i.Sief. fi ypciUor ueruffec. Irt Ujt dcSu^trmcptnMb U)EHTh. tfti facba 7 Sod. vxyci ctlt. kbdAb dc £Ucbx. j Anfcbtl o .7 xctti m BUrbebcm bun#. X. 1£.. eptf pben#e emu unef-7 red did? d/ct -Ed?. ittt' toot, lTkiio fitrrc'&itufe nfitu^ulof.ti eptn&uoc’ Ht adulp'Se# Sauibne^tetr . 1 . ay in jpbenda.Cerlcn twic uocac.7 defrt fcAta- fotni. lln br.ut.uii.ibf 0 ( 7tui.£>orrl/cu.i. cap j nr tor u^pcc-fdtXK.E."' c-tot. leuuitfmuite' ttipberiSa. Tn ca# udU mf Wtttf jxti 7 Ojeni. i • fdm .jibt ire ■t- Wtfbcu biw/cai‘yi.motm be.?cL.fc>£. Jbi ^da fTancupbe'.t. car j # ‘-knttf tm.i.in anajb f m'bouere beep/7 Gnnua calun. boettrr uat' fci. Ub.'dPi.E/r^cn-U'b. $ird> nnuw. j n &ocb daj( 6 & xd Aluut.j. fblm. 7 ibi Vfe'.'ot. ud£ '7-jX.bord' jmrtzjruafc.mi.lif>. c. f Radulp-t- CoUn.Jfc-i-car mZtuc. ..f. "TbtK-W ^Vatcei* 0 -1- fc-ltn.Tibt'br.m.aiH/ 7 ,c. Iuk tsrtmr-Se pttaidtf^ar'rafallcaT'c. ^ W iuLa-.<;m.fe.t l«) 8 c i JS»£ftW» - | n SAtrafuajl^ W Hitt’s piaaii i/wij J 7 pal. acf./m 1 -SSdi dumt&lm■ «(■ lir.ii.ailfefV cu«t.cap' 7 ^ ltTl Q l 5 tu ^ tfc l l ^ 7 ' , y 1«. lot. T R. 6/1111 -l*#. - 4 nGn;dit mho . In JMd am ™ R3doU?. in. u'13.7 tbi ».m. uW A vm.lwrtt'm.i. adVat7 uaW% tenute 1 ^L£. )m &C<0i)B£fid-w- /lNCoftNELai ‘no . In dSSdXW ^du^ujtmt.1.bt.ni uiabf y ‘^\i.'bo$ cu-i- cAckj dim 1A Vat/ 1c*t , .T.R.fc.‘ t xL.fo'f. ^Anceccflbp 0 mruttr'w pbenda ftmilit/. ~Jn XS^da W jUrufi^atSi dimtAfclmTdnnt^ "iuau. 7 ibtlir indmo• i• cap/11• niHblpu• GcnA.Vab tx.fct'.dXf: Xad.(oE bmne tenutt. 7 r Stbcfccfuualr' W Sujaf . t • uum J dnmA.7tbi \rt m'btric di-m^ cjor.lxu tuiibf 7 1 -berk- Va^.^0^0.fX/ VR-E/cXW^' fob. ■par’tpftutVcmut infbenda. ~lSLifft'llaf niediaif np lam n)a»t^rtta ren-i. nuxCi. ‘p/dimtA./ibi’Pir'. i. uittui cu.n.boik, VabiXX.fdt,TA.f- 1 '; /OC*o. (c>t. S pirttcf•tenure' i n pbettda ~ln fwlm^clai tot Vt’itif JtU 7 6au(rbi .t. fbUn . 7 ibi Mu' '' mdmc>.i.cdrp 7 iiu. utHbfcd.i. captye&mi.tw •’£&.£.• Jci -tib- Sitd tenure in pbeu^a- Jnlotcba ten Batbuui 7 . t. fetm . 7 tbi bt'. mi. uittbp7^j. ' bold/cu.ii.cap Vab.mi-U'b.T.tt.Et'c.fdt'. £^umtenure. ~1 ti BcdicUu^ xd Q>c&yi£. i. f lac ^7 {oca .7 in. moW CD ode bartons'^bL^ YaLiemer (amr. xj*. ftexodir.' aluf cjui fjicmtf y (amr t^Jbra.^i. in jbffaro auttzras. 72 ttbiep£ Vc ^af.vu.y 7 ^^ dauju|bm dlinf-xuii. W^akio cajtelli. 7 dMmc flint'. cc.^xu.tuT^.fu^ AT ^iiof lib ip: QlcX dc (oca(Jm olen# redder. c~7(nti.fch. xf )elonai ri*lA dpcVi u. fo£. Jbi Ml 1 . dap ;pa cju^ tblekwc.^ t^arn^r^f. in -pr&r de c£nfu. pc Appciaf'. Tarn epuxzn ric peddrtryyoc. iti» ayfa|^7penfkraf.Jxc t»i.lii> numtyu. Swpl^oma \yt mcecons. CyX- Cot- bua(bom buoy. bui^fta.ana jWtTajtini mcdinii nmm mnen? fpUnuXLl. u*\b.yc.lib. mo ^ofinnUr- Tern fWeuuo6e7-4a Pape7^ Standee’ yedAdpcc.fot y y 1. ben ad g ono^np in etemoftna. pi tnUnS s otattun nunefT! cdLciArmeL csjionicoy. ■ S^Vdr^LtT^Y^d^^indi^. lbdondib^boare: 7 .Lt. Udtb.v1u.t1i3 . nobol'M 11 .lib'. TreTecc^ dp Bouqn- rftUr.xw 0 i.(bliS'.^y l ii. 4 cnar^ B e pAfbira cO edr^cb ue /be boro f boaej^ ycmii'.jx.S^ y tm. denar'. Vna fdftuta, mSibemfouafc'-'Xvi.ded y&bt. £c& a)gyttr? yfc.X- moienXydimii'. redder (Jii.Ufc.t'H.B* 'amd'reddibepjTlobo appaartc. ffcu.ifc, fed n 4f (icuu canonicc^.- a ub tUxf moUmf mantTt:.p?c una ya^MV*xed£. n- foUdf. b&hdc cdmuruxtOPZ faAvdiitYffioqpltfarinif ijV. fit! Jbi funtf'Wi. bbef cd. t. carydimtcfc. Jn comon 1 -d^^cnarrm. (unf. cccc.A&tyydirv&. anp ■f urn/ • 11. foanofp dim i&. Tp-qa nunq- reddtft aUcja d(wzf -rudmif ad'(cm . fax*' utJ - (ohm%ornu Xtxmamr. hjp Ib-iVA funt'.C.acty- cjitefeabqetaxr uln V.l Li-fo abc^ecahyv ''. A-p H ordedbe; amt. t. acrt-Jc ■ dj> Bpin^. epit ^c^cajtt(e vbiy (xipioYa. jn hdcx^funt iii-uiUi 7 JX' kro- birtr.f. carpdirmd. jo orb* (i cAnomci h* bgfwrr fu-uci uif.eA/ ualepr Leg finqui'annir. mdSo n bm: mfi.^clmu, IA.7vi. ^.7un. fl^.ann ulp^eGlubtlf autVrofun mtt, R.cdrc^ep’ine nd auferraffiric 5 ittannir. 70 c.denar 7 unXidliria 7 una pifWi/ fill 0 j uomfded ^cbaicvd marK. aun , ^ uno -molitw eir^z ..nolettahr illtf- Larfbb’un MJabAfb-an. Pv dbulpPe aifbeipine un. j 2 drCantuar : . ^pc. Ip u^d ieniontjbr^. • llt ^lJlemacbl/^befet. .X- t cmief buffauthiuS. •llljtfS -jci- Ricarbur^e'imebvuje. y.tps 5aiocen(Is. *X»J• l|> airno uiceeowef. M-^lbbana SeSataxirje. -Xijj AlbepiC apdUnuf. .mij-0rit bnc.tm.carljbi fiwv.ui.(eruiJi-intieo ^fAke^rX.^Mi.f^-W.Silua.CfcAX-pntf 7k*f "Se Wafer 7 raUunt^ t. (if pi*. Jneuuaifr/Auenl’- / ]nboccr h-nt'.fC-Ceruu l ’®™'? 1 , f a '® 4inameftf.7Xl'gJ» baimo fimilno*-: 5,1 ;W^4n^t^^p«V.ii.«mr7uwiu5“. , Y.R.t- grant'cifaUiffrLitif in c(uetuStn^.JbiW^.il».. __j appaac it 1 anqtif.lv. Lit*, ppofrr ufrancuj' 1 i |tu unf iS jmtu. diar qa ui£ pfe xaA \‘txUw de ifothApOC. X& penCttaf^cja. ^ v3& fa W.&- m oja rj vu. \&j#C npx.A&CP T^.y'dAhuc ranrpti quanta pan M-X. dcf'ttp'- que on u m jtrma. feqrfB. da imujvc.ln Mtjfc. \ot- biairrt'dut q&ofuuarb Tcuuxcomyttfhtrt ^ alejfcan ppofrtDlund^7mxgn befcr daptfer^tepof J^eJbirn:quoq; qd b aoel &f detfbtn jhUta. .e. qqr fedeja^ dn/ foltn. banc tf^-tcneb^tutcecom. -7qdo uicecowttam drntttckrc.in j^mamif feniant^. fa,pinan(rr''7po(t more/ K..£. fflo&o ten kutjo&e' otnv. cu.l .mi.acttft^jf ptuf,Totu 1 we. pb eeoti rn pajif adhuc funr dtla^. Vi. aci^ ■^qu^afvlua qui if^olaaanif pofutr jj*r crv _p qdcfa uadimo/. #1. fol&op.. f ficc taw buf & ter/tps Sc kouecefWyl^Jx-job txtra banc fu/aSbuc iBi. ui.^ceUfiol^. ^cjtu-snKugDiep^. ra B l ’/?J3ft4M6teW7. •ecnf Vrfc- ^adar^tanir qdm& >ena "tEncr qua V.R.£. q <3 illa/tenutXy'dlno^ / citS duaTparcefculSa uittS p atm ai^utrtr. /"J ccti-6 ^7 deamaf tna cr) -ted afc£ S’d ucyufhtny'^l Tot^ dftttii. frUnf amn V je .XV. Tgn UWM9t;»nr;J ‘yit. jcjUnf^dEfd*- ^^cqu. carfjr dnio furrt'.'Ti. Ibt',wc• uttti cd.^ct.'fcnr^ hnrir' .^liiu cap ^ ltn • *J. fcpuiy'i- nidi/ de.jx'c.^jt^/ii • ac pa. S dua. c. pon>y r ^^pajtata (tlu^. jxxXr t{&/n- de/ tine' v . pa. daa. c. pcrc'-7^^pajtata liia^. tfCc\\d0.jn. c fl)vpcata.£tr.m derf.y'iH cArwxafaurtat&.m. hoa^j^Vo^i i^cvn.] n tnaf tuilenc > t.axlef?. pc.Vfc. v. foti&'rmn.y pcfb/pc.U&.a\o&o u xt cJW. ,w. lt^. nWRocksftl k’p . una GUn fe dcjd'.q'ia -X) e.jcv. ca/Jn dnu? (unt.m.ca/^/M-uitti cu Vl.Wret’ bntr.^. caP^ltn. twn.7«xlat. ac pti. SiUui. bcc- pore’ f Inc Toruale^. 1 .H.E. xv■ qdoIVa uno peap’. rc\ uaf ..vc.l 1 J 7 .Tarn Y&b£.^i.t&.7uicetJtni>ehr' 111 .be T»oc ft) vertixtfyx? tu*ta pniecejl re 1 rarnu v\y. qcf appaac. vtt.lt^. £pi i?aa de tUuccejb^p ^ccabio i^einqua cajlrllu fedetr. xamu Sc bactS ted. qd^ocvtt.fjt/mi SmW. ..k^C>- Siy. xedquar jot. (olrns dejid. £?ctiabof/funt in dmo. mi. (oUni.yxU ,m. car m drno.|nboc on. cx.^jK. tutti diJx/nu.lw^. Vrrrt. cjx.gu. ca/]bi dint Vi. mot^ de.oocv. folt^. 7 ^A’ni.ac pa.lU.^XJva.fating de.^c vn. folidis.. I ikea igcWept GwVmeNsis. CkptV l].l cj CivuU'i'l' ClMAMAtr l T^htc a.Mnqpi.xu-lMr' 1 cnznfvC .7 PC pecep.‘ / X.k& m.XV- U^xd^-taiucpn ■tenet pedct'.xwi.lib. _ ' . fltlf ^ J-pfe Antes ten’-OT^ffd inWo.^p.vi it.jfrdep'.Tpe’ jcl.a.car' Jn dmo funt .Vt. cap Jbt. c.fan uiUfatjXvtn. bopTInfe <*i V. ca^ tbi. vut.fe^iyvtWtmV- ijee ti. (o\iS.y 1. Ac pen. Stliia^cX. pore* ^ e Vice. tern it l. TEupit . t • -fell n 7ditni&yibi kne tnStiw .«. cj.]x^ ■ uiUcd-ja-Mi Wmef m Wlbt-«- 7 „. mo6 Ae#xm-rA/.7*X/Vm- fa- StUu.wW! ^vrvtSaalera7d.&-fc-/fak u£Jb appaar'bmti apdr Itb.'Tfi^^-'Txiidib.uicarooe ToneWura pit in fraln^ W>appoai7 X- Idp njpfe audmps tenVwMttsst-^ anofcltydim fedift In dmo fanr. ni.aiy 7 ^ vu. atffi citiv. bold' bnt^.Vm. c^‘. lb*.Cm.ft|*uiy in.nto^/dw dc ■pent. foli&v'clin/. IbuS’tu.pLcfa. Stlua* ]pc.y>a^- Lbi $a&. ] n tutiftulmt/ *d R.t. uat. pet i.ltb. 3c3o fecej^M. 1^.7 »n<3^ jXVill.lib’.laiii iWdttr.^ociii.li^^/uTiunivInt’ m/cjT-irtw A^tK. 7 jw hcUuGfiu't Ixw ^ J^rte atdiu.*pl W.4 ^t^. in- fnltnf Cede(3' Yjn.^ In dnio Cane. u. car- /pet i • bnr.^.cai ^\bi fatcLT/xii.yriote) E .^.ini-(jUnf(e^e|d'-Tta-e> , (ij. car^jn dmo {unr.ii 7/ jocou. tutii at. n-borS I?irb.vm- car- Ibi eoia.^jir. mo& de-. L. (dx& 7 Vt. den. lU.vTer*tu. at pa. Siliu- .xL pore'. jr/tpafuAlmt 7^.6. u £C ' ptl\.\S.yJtS gdo lYcep. lUoio^XVi.lib. Tram ivdS JXlSS. / t.....l ...A 11.. J |s Usf DHieMoft- ' i : ]h LAww>clrtstn-ww Tpfe arcbiep4 W m .^. n- rotmf — le-deJ^iTn-C. vu. caf. In dmo (anc-in-axr-/ r ffl:.w)- tuHt atvxu. baud’ bmc'. v. car l bi fadk'j Q Terni ./it • •mofe' de.jx- Ke-Tzmvlm<& eja W tnfualeug^. uab jN'EftrfAa-KjMi fxoc.&- \lfa ardnep^ -reA' &lu>Veba^ :^p will, folmffeiep. T^a. G- pc*-, cat*. In dmo Hinr. tn . cap: 7 t/o^ vt. uxtii ca.^wui.Urd"brnr.^uii^caiTlbt pd&Jpc. femi. ~7 n%. -mofe' ^c'^cw- Uid/^jx'.ac pa. ‘bilua, ^do fmcajxC^ / cjnaem/'pard- t«T>ocmHitt’s Atfpenfarft' {oltn.7ibi Wc'-i.car tn dnw.yn- ut&ofdtlmd car/ be tc^nSWiiotflr^cardrepo.i.foltn/ibibr.i.cap/ yci- ulHaf cit .i. bo)^ brncf. ti.cap! ^tnplb ^ntaai {farman. t. tu^ydiin ^eambiepaytbt lit in. car.^ViutHifcuixn.cctr'bmefit.ca^^lbi x.(ep«*- Snxrofualenc/Y.LE. uat bccni.^V.ltb.ypofb.XVt- ld>. Ilodo ayyciaz 6mu apcbr jocim.Iib.y7 m m fad! pocce. IS. Iltlrtu /pCl . lib- K. icarfi/'JeVonebtvjr - cjd 7 W m fua tm^a/appciar pw.\S. ~v -- rr r. r -.^)pc.a V &. [Tn -X. Ac pa. bilua. pav. pait. [fee line m red de arebufa. lit. mil re', mi dbltnly tbi bne'. i it. caryAim iribvio.JpvXu . uiHaT atjc-W^ bri^f.Vi. cdfdjpc. faly^ntr-i molinSe.V- QX/^an. act pay 7 !!. pifca7^7^m«^ de- c l.XVX.arnpull/• 11 • ialm. S ituX. jOCfu. port’ Intaaf ualrnt"l'.K.£ual' ^xm.xmi.lb.^OopKep.-' Xu. lib.ym 1>ma apdmpt oat >y.lib. Illilrcu.XV- lib 7 X- fab fllanacbt cantuar bmr cniti Anna de- duab. boib/ Vtui° ai /pCC- lab. (li) CljMftb- _J-'p.fe aTun GtliKSEKt.^p - v * • |e depK Tta.e.jXO. ^af') 11 driu> fumr'. 11 «■. car. In"Suio fanc.m.oa*. 7^*c.7^-a® di’joeo-Wf W-iWw*'^. y tk «S&1 \.motm diJxcy.cW./iWc.iii.nc.pa. Silutt- poc. W7 V. fating ptfeana. JtiWuaW -^fU- uaitucbiefojniii. fc.9CSo pzp/fmufay I* Sup fye l^aitbtepS VW 6 tnMioJ?7 Cni-£ lr rfi*-Sc(* -fin.e.xcvi. car. lndmofiuwTi. C. fcit.Voci|V ■trrti’.y m patel' \mc.ycp. a$.\ Vi-m/c®'. 1bt.fi. fcrai.V^ciH. ao pa. Situa. yc pon?. ti waf aiiJm iXt • uatiire facm. JW11 .lift 4 yi. feit 7111. dm 4 -7 pnft UTca. 7 m url-JVC. lit /ieW an Wioirfi^/HigelPirarAiepo uri fclm 7 dnrf 7 11M.7ttubTO.m1.cap., 7t111.u1ttofciC.ym.tom bfitefui.car- Jnttpc uat. pe-lifr be W tint manacti.vm.CitpaTO. -] H fcfcEfset't Wid- Tpfe aitbtepfW t g i'ya » ff6 -tii1>nio.J , y".rr >• —*tirt iciif-pm’+i ’inf fe defa. Tpae.. Li.it; ( .JI u.car-cu unbnic^pv'n.fc 1 ,«..-. at*, tar- Itidtnofant.im.caf! yjdiii.ui® dC btttffoj'caf; /lbt^i.'fnolinftlc.mi.liK 7V. fot 7 c.ic pa.Silua a. pore' A>Wftpnnn^r Ti t. inawraar' .in- mafure .7m Vionfunrnifi v \x.v. qa ate 'font' drjfruc^jnoiuliofprratunte andnept. tpfo fen:ri batmtmac.dtnnS ar - •/ t I* arthiepi Wm ^”5^ J ^i.t.r4 In ifa W«• «•;> »«■ f f n v fcartupi Wmimo V-Mmf/Arr.^ fedrftf fta-e InJroo futit.li.cai7^''-^ H > ca.xcw i.to^>)m«f.«»• ca. -n.oUft. ttlobo iut7W.^.77W 1 ..®-/l, ll 'W'', v / / ls'oilc lu-Uc h '.’ tlfr 71 ofe ^ ’ 'ffl.f.xl. ctfln Snio.l'Linfelryife. nn-cap/dun. ini.Wv’i. mtK at- ^ocoH.borcf fitt.7flc.cu. cap! Ibi. X 11 - Icrm^an molt if deed .Serf tbl .JflCC. U pn -Stlua. xcd. yrc, Itironf uaUtirc^ ■ uM.yenu.WXl >0 W’-'^ nieio appcuKxwmi.l^.Ttam faUrJ»-1»- ' In aitbifpc mt iriiin /flv&dfl 'tP uno folmfedcff. Tpa-fl ■ am.cap) n dnto .it. our; 7 111 -7, v0[ ■ cu 7‘ 1 • bold 7 Wt.aa. «u4 liu- Vm- ferui.7xu • at pn 7dim. Stlua c jcl. pond Wfaf T'.R.e.-ua« Xu l«^dc t**p/ fe,u.Uft7rrMbo.pC<}.^7-fan reJ^-.Tflfl.l*. , t In U5f be ESlkCt t ]H ^UtOtK vVttfirr V pfe aref icpS ten .fef.inc . li 7ife . m dineJobns ft 'cfefS’.l'. fL.f.7 m ^twe O.-fta.c , Jn ^ ^ Cl I, car. y'qte r c. luHI dt.x>fl. fcuta. Snwf I on. oaf Ibt.Ciit fedtiy'n.nioK ,in.. xtcc.hu.iV.’.SlIiU.c. pcni^ft.fiWle ^iiurufet.)n-a^AiaW78..E.ual' iwcWtt. UB.ScSd lyaif/'l'mtla./mXW. _ __ c/ boc m xen cte 3irif! i• fblm ]n n.t‘cd .7ibt bt? m dniiJ i- cai^Ttliu-uvttbf-7un mtlrd?- cu.t, cxfi/ilna pifcar* m (aluid. 7«X. C> dc fdb^u iaUj^’tte.sr.f^^^an.ao ^o. Sil.ua ..WVpe^ Cl?? trtt) • lnTOn.fuaW/?XE. uaf^p ojl.jc-liK-IILjJo ,$x Iesi'. 7 -j tt -B dtCJU' |fpfc ATthuy 4 ten dtSlW'r’oWe tn Amo.b CAT. 7 bucena utHl iX.rnincu.l .torcTbnt [pcc.czr. Ibt peck- Jp, m. feruty'iw molA bejcCl- fot.7ui bi Cat/ b&ya. bent Jti.c fax. fa-$ikui'.Jx.port£ lrna?of ualem/ R.X.ual«£ •^^•t^.'/?OT^q^o)'ecep. TTU $0 jvd£'.C.l&^joc.{<£. artTncpf-cen^uilIacju^ uocar"s'matW ygurfcCb tfturfewyiacec in ipG Wn^Hept|p uvcfotmydi/ 4p-e ^ ln'inw .^^ccct.tj^. As banc ^ jpttn .<^ 11 . banjfef in 'ompuapa. ftHHres 4Jiu- Qtyun.-'benJ bi •<*/. moK ^.pcc.r^.y'parua.fttiia. 1 nbac uilla Ten fs.aAulp'^nn foLnbe ardnepo ylbi lit' 11. caritCbmo^j v* uitjtoCca.m.'bord'hrneCn-cajy r £im$. TXE.uaWt .vi t. 'Sm/ Glin 2 > n^ait/ 7 aliuS Simlblm uuf faup.mi. 1 turnerqui ytxrl&to&YX 2$) arttnepl-7u^Wp 7n> uaUnr dno. Vi.l£. ^^etpfotri A&mam lacec in Limef dimrtf mcyxydimft utt^a. ArclnepfWin Hn to 7 ibi Ttt/.i . cafiy 7 un ui^n cH ;XCiiibortf' frntef.i- cdr/dim^.Jbifant -Vii.p^nqui y^Hunt.Vn- 7 v.f#. Tfa-e. 11 • carS/^y’valan.jxi 1 ■ lifr. T^nun yMxe.y W. IH?. \D c tT> Ten awid" CfioatT^ef^p.i. cn- ^ uno fbliti 7-Vii. Colvnffettj^- l^.e.U .dt. InSruofurrc.T 111 ^ 7 c.citin'uittf cu^vt.boy^ bntef- 1 v. car. |bi £&£&'/jc. fenn 7J \. moling. yooc-derf- 71 • pifcar*be^an^mlt• 7 ?CW‘ac tm. Silua.c.bore. %v Y r R F CT tRulUdfi^to EW5. 4w JU ? E9Anl 7 »n^ niVpcuf*rer/ai'cbtc^*. JJL.^ u^ojc-tino fectefft.-r'ia-i ^ .... ,_ > feAefft.i'pi-e^ .._.. ._.., .df^ 7 jWii. utHi cu.v.botn lnTteT.tii.£ar7c[tn^. ]n 6 nio funi^ ot/ Vi. tuT^ens^^tn . 7 .R..£. uaU^.^xVim.I &■ tpcl-lcK- /vnftmilrv-^iam rvcbitv Jx- [do. c cc-ceri.u\.\)otf ajrJnept. 11 .folinf 72 >nn. 7 t 3 nrii^ iu^u. 7 ibi Knr.V. carirTSrnoT/^CC-mWoC cu^Xci-tW^, hneef. V. czr/'dimfi)7/1. QrUuyi 1. moImV.Vil • fcrfcjzvi .^en • Silua.^i.p^^bt.ii.ra^.]nt 4 r»r litt'.jCi.lilj. .. , - [ H^U - BtUSl'LwD. ilpfe artbiepfW H e^gt&fNC.^ uvofclmfebefct.i'pi.e lbi fartr -^cvv-uiHl ca.wi.bori'- V)f^t^^^.v.car : .J^t•&'mq^ , eatu VjcLfot. v. ^er/tnin! S itua.^xl. yore) 1 rrz roed X R, .£. ual^. c. (ofc.SOo ycaJp /jCi 1. Ul/iri tfc. Ufa ■/rarn fpofa? recIA ■jcmu.ili.ffic. foltif. 7 lbi M-dc Sdm. xx ■ beea% lilua xm^brin/LuleLuu.'Tfl.f.ualetar boc£)Mi.lt&.7iri jci.lifc. kclnS hncmonadn ea mua7- iuuu&.jS u tjWt fuu."7 ~~1K aSu-lp -fUF ^nfpdc wn fcleffoi^earcfaj^. —^ ^■^cj^'.Tra.^ lnlmn? funr' . V • cajy 7 . Lutti ca jx-bent hrre.XO. car. hi it. pxty.yjx. {cmiju-mold' dc.yl. m. fot./fa yc. ac pa. Situa* /aaLu&.xvi.IS.Jm uaf^ .^e. tf^. b e - boc 5> Ricarb 0 Tonebn^c.xama filuf uriSejXift y°(T.xc. yotd.Jx ■ mohn be.v. (ol^. 7tinapt(t-anain Ilia leuiu. B^aljeW 7 "ten He archiepo. in. 1 uqa. in 0rpimrm. ]W ptb ramn in u^a m7ofptm/./tctu ^tra. t'-ja-e In Hnio .t. carynii-uiHi cA. t .bort-yi 111 . Ierti. 7 ^i 011 ^^ 7' 11 • ac fn.7(iiuA-W .pofc^^a.L.tule^ xl.&.fao , ^frcepTx^-fofr. 7 ^-1 • ^• ( 1 7710 UIcec ^ Tiai 4^ ( f° BfUfiT'fbt.J^uno “Tktri^HnnlK fe Hep". 7|a-e *. car. In Hnio (unt^n. ypeeww. uittl cu.^i.1?orH'^nr7cu.tenuit/ iln oh ^bea^woo carrcua/- mt ie IrHnepoO tCcv^ r?.n. foUnm^i^M.7m c f.u .TtLnc* Tia ^fc-ca^nHtiio lunc. 11 • eafm. tutft cu.Viu. tori' Krrr / .V 11 .dr Ibi.^^.^’ufi 'vcuH d&.wi\X£Cyy\\\. & pd-Situa c\uxcJVC. yore. jiirW.^R.t.ual^.^.l^^CHofBC^.-^ Oni-lft. lTlcbo.fii-l&. \noc%)zenurt Alfa"'bea.vdi. . jtf%ai goRH£ kw &. K.a^ulf 17 ptuf-anatei W SobroHE ^eairHiej^. 'Simla^ImJbHej^./ia^m^t. (olinCber biolmqer imme. iva. e. 1 ■ e^Tt-m.jonio. c u.na.car./’tn.uitK cu.ttj>or& Vine'.-1. lbi |obk /7n. ao j5aV7filiu ^evt- porcHnr root uab/ualurc Tol^. Py.tcaj ^ 7 Vo afctupi W Heeo I e unololin ft* HcjH'.^in-e Jn'Smo.t. ea/. 7 iu aitft cu.t-bot^ Vmr.t.car. Stlua.v. por^ 7 R-£.y'poft uab.^f^ Heard? InBoItomC Wtr - Jyn.joc.fd’. b iU.0 F-Hilr. i? unofolm feSejcf.Tta x In Htu 0 : z.\ .car. 7vnt. uitH t nr'. 11 .dp. fbt.V. ferm.7?c. / a? px.^mi-faltn/^.im.f^.T.R.E. Tboft.^^um. c. fcf. m .Vl .t(f. 5ebtf bnrmonacbi ran v 7?#' jjK-W- ( 14 ) HiBHHH CUmiIi . odejrib 0 cUpijb ten der afcbnpo.-Leitbt .^p. 11 • {cltn' 1 {b&ju.Yfa.S' In dm*? fumr.u. afyX^-uitti CU.il-twfi’* bnr.iiii.£aird IJJ 10 l\iv inbniO.l-C3if^uak.0cS&. y^YcBoJh lAoMldwi&Al# 1 -V Wnjtsrtw UW Kr fu *';w7xi«. Sts «» k-.«,. fclav....- a*?/*. a? «*,’ >™fitfW.T££. veiiit-wain-US- iMumjfr.,^- Wsr SrmsfoKS. 'V : lrtfffl.T J War /; jl4"4foi ot uuuynu. ^ y -- „ "Jpft a>tblcj 4 re^ff-lXE/m ^.v. foUnf/uro lugD.fp.e.^-a/l*^’ funr-H-J^W- wtti 4 C 4 y*bWp 4 m D£V 53 b*«iy itji M ^lltt.bcr^it ^trc.tiii■ cary 7 ^iw'-Lyfc-Eerai^ 71 ■ / v ' ! - nffi^Wu^-rEr/ iptnber^' be ZrthiifOy^Abm{b\in Ce' ^dbabrr.Y. R..6- gulf W^anCtveC pm^xroual.nii.ltl?. r)y^ro'Se'oftoncfavtr'zer/deairl)tepo ]h fcfA-bwfr- TXt\ual<^> ^.^i.tdvQor&xpatfcbu^s/etn.lA .7 -. / l).^it.j 2 jlinfftie(H^'T!k.E. 7 A 49 .«i.folinf. M?eo uaUr. -I't&vJM&ry ”dnw {wK-iu&fyfaxui.udttcurjcuA>o$ ~|pfe aicbtepi WboiltWOCB 0 Rfc£fadef^ Tia.e {rnrtf.^. cipTbimtK. lb pxtXj u • (mil i Tfc.mo & bc-px. poCiin- cat- in Arno Cum fu-^jpc (- uiflT cn-jC ^ 1 ■ bo]'£krjt tVXtti. Col&ywxiu-jZfa-Sdiu qvjoc. yard- car. lln mof^/'Cin.aS' p.StUa .xl fofc. J^\)Oca)^nn.CC.^KC. bui^efjn Bar^nlsc^ |>tt W Y.R.t.ypojlr.uitc^.^.^ .,m inv ’zzrdt QOcyc-wo-lm-C/ftj S^fyT^fe U ttttfbixefa . Tj^dmit# Coim ^ic^'.ip-^.iti- ca^-lv'itno fum.u.jx-. utttv cLUX-bcnd’hnc. i.cayyirnn- [hi-jc^u:. Xc pny'Silua. joe- yam. f -•udl^b: - Qt^yofh/Wx- CJC, Ulobo s^m. lAo-y-carf) y&lzt' 1i " ^ ^ " '■ rw^ y n -aJ'i&.Ljycfc. uAS.^X.lS^/rn ud pCOel00. ■ayeceyCvui.l£> \jwc & &Cc A^A~Cyi. c.Ui.car- InWnio (unrin yjocyc-wlft aLix-bcrrcF. hm.jX.-car.\b i. on. fdltric' / - Vni. Qdyyc- Aar. l&bot X) yrtirf.joc t ■ WuttfC. cjui funt m Runnenet.V cjUtty tic ait^icp5-iu- jmTf^aaf. tatjtMamit.^ac^ jracm^tnitMlu . U he. cm\z fepurau it flCzipft ■font omf cfu«uSmeT7 ^Uaf fonfficaf ^Ctmtaa rrm fif/7 func in nunu fWr.T.^.L^p^ udlmr/.X-^- 1 Ltflr'''* 0u ^>' ^ pp SXT/ttt'5 Tsai ^fdiieLvnilE ^A^EStVtKg. f uno foltn Ct ^ Aeferitf.jn'inu) Cc-u-ca^/j..^C. fgltnf fe !.&■•£ rn^.C’ti. Tfa e.?C0c.car-\nArnc {tmc.un.TxW.titUl cu-T^i-wv^ Wrrc 7^ccu.(ma.'7 l pc<3i- 2 Lc yn- SiLua -pt. jn -rrof ualmc MBl i • uiUf> ^CC. l^p^C.^.X'Jx? peep ^XC/. 1^. TTloJo/pOC'^i- lt^. L tcar^'Se T^netn^e be mfua Wp ti&.jWin -fit7W ■ Aen\ S iliu-pxx. yard- , Jpfe aniSpI Ten ' Jh it)g& C &Tkt * -bW-' 4 p.w. Gltnf (eiejS’. Tja. e- ^cx:vi. oK In 5tncfunc. m ttiHl rn.lyi-bar^ bntr.^.car. lb yd&:7nt.vux£de pc 4>u. fol^ 7 lb. Qiu. femt7Vt‘ pilcanc. >»e mille CC- an^iut^. lbt- -jxmi.^c j xi.Silua.c be y\a bu?3) -red baity4§ m |Vuo Am®’tolinT’lbi \ic -n- i.{mwC7i.tnc 11. lt£ /fTloSc -‘^ooc it. 1^. lt> © xfe Su?A> W WitfT Vo luaf-ramu ejAtut. VtiXifr If* Arcbiepi Ten f 4 o;R 5 £Vb£ jl 4 bvHf r . ef uno 6 &n feJej^.T^r. y In dmo.,.cat^W. yT V11. utHt cu-jocoi. bom?bttc.it.car. kuic 5> ptmmt' tn ciutarcc cAnauma .C.Xuwrfef. w. tint?, yeddmrcf • citi.lt& y nu.(ot". lVi. Vmi. tnota de.bocuQft.7j0Ciiii. AC fa. bilua. .m porfc Jnexot tul^uaWy*VM. Ufr. Jlmxti JkxicxtViLi It' lesY . tacec panuTbutyu ride? s e s e lrk ^qt jpf>e ynu co\x\y SLrcfnepi f\u&A not tUzc-zvrf at m attach iT. I n onto: d an A cat 7 jxl Oilt. bor£ cu. 1.car. tti eeckk.7 cm. pifcara 'iijocv.(of. S ilud- jx- Pot t* l. R. [. 7 Poftr'iLdiutr joc. V- fat. Jj& . c. Pot Jff pie arcbvyPs -ten PRgSV C Tfr H fc'. ^p uno To[m (edef^. Yta-e-^i-^1 n atfto Purtc.tii.yjCtuu$icu.Xiui.botd' bnt.til. cat Iki pictkyi-iefuuC/i- mot? finecicnfu’yuna. ptfearu Se.cc. i. anguilltf. lbt. it. acpct.Silua.V. pojd TX£. t pofir ‘ uoliitt'. pc. iib. Wodo/xo-t^. Hr* arcViepS -ten — jH - fT r U: #ER6 ^-p.mi • lolmf fe defi-t. ita .e. pem 1. catfln dfuo funt-'u. bc.uiUi cu v xw- coefhnt xv. airy Aw/- Ihpa&frfertfi , V nio& -dint de SyQc.(&*JiXXX. Ac paJfilua.pcxV. yo) i c*. X a .1 .7^ dc> i^cep/iulttrc Tcn.ldS wobo/xce)d&. yearn peddre aox .(<£. Jifft aitRieps -ud GoofE R. g» k 4 <* >yt>A?n 1. fd.inffedefd', tja-tz'vacii. car- In dnu func.ft.Tbc.uilti cu.^m.coc'* Vinr. i >\?[ 1 ■ cap Ibt^ccl^- 7 u-{eruty 1. rnotX lie.pCCV-iot. y’jxrii. ac pn- ^>iW. ^.yort.yvcetsudlutt' moclo/yx. Ido. yearn r'eddtv'. yxc. tfc- . ^ s Ipfc Afcb\ep£> tin* C€g c ^^ r 1>. 111. loltnf IhG - RT r?CHt> - te irj^.“tia.c.5cn.cafiln Spu>(tLrtc.fi- 7 yooe*n> uit& dx t Xi • Coc"' R rtf. ^11 • car /Jim- [fc t . feptt . 7 ti. tnolXie.Vi - fbltS- 7 fatm aSeui-len- Vyxvu.Acya XSiUia. c ■ porc^. tR.f-oi o yeedp.*' ualuV. xu.trf?. 1u0Sc.X£.\&.Train y&t> Iffc*iren 1 upsxert ^ocvi 1.1$. • ui. bi&yditi. "ttA.e . Imlrno furtc-'U- 7 ^ci^-Ulki cu.^Xora \ixrt (Ju.co?. Ita.u.-mol^'ber.y. poVjx.fat.J'Xi-Acyy’ftUu le ryybu.?&)Ter{ ^tlffde-arctiicpo dtmti' foUnyibtbiv' y&ycA.car. cu. tm. fcruif 7X-<&C pn.7ftlua .A. pot^- lotuct) uale^ "f. R.f .7pojb.'C• {Ji. mo&5pM. W. 7 Vni-fof ynnuben. -oznrajjpcur’.^xl. fdf. ' ~ 1-j^ie ArcXitp4 -rcn > ’ s ^etteT^R..I:. Pe-^d^yXuSolmC. -^m^V- rfa e-jcwi-car. Irulnio (um-uiLr/cpPxx.. yrjunwBX cu.V. W^' bnc.pat. carydim. ki.vu. ferm. i _ _ . .den. 7&mpxi%xl.l r r t Les ’ /^e [sTKea . / C&rKct I^hd- \yofc arclneps -at ^ gr’R.Ct . ft defeP. -?ya .e. In ditto fiurcr. m. earn bex^tt- utHt- oL.ycu-'boi£ bve.jocuu. car.lbt.umcdvnydvr^ de.jxxx. fdttfym. fait ny de.nu. pd^y'ywiu.acpa. Srtuayx:. port- fr m fc> mu ay* em wmacbi ca.mua.tdtm?? Poiitt yunuiuyi^yit.Aciy'tbi'UrK'M-udKfficu-iccatydim. JrJ zocuX.^Xy pofl u.a1i&. poCMid&yjC.vk 7 ttti ■ dxxi.Jt. ferdiny. fft odo.^XXK It? J[pfe- atcmepS mri •f'&fSltii ' n y ^vn. Glinffe Jefit. Tfae Indmo.u ■ car fancyd\r&Jc- uitft cu Xntt.bofd'hinr.xxxvu cat. Ibi-ocm. dcpay^u.Qrut. StUu adclaufura. W-qa I^ur cf>-cerf'. tj. mrlirepcte ArcP>iepo.m. "bnc tti'Smo.mt.cut.7xviu-uidH cu.^.bord'hrrc.t.caf. ~tocu uah&.jcbit&.Scdo receptfl-milrap Tl odo yydX Cr. lSyrxdo-qa {tt 1 • luyx.yuJJajpannu-X■ &?■ fuyfcn^tjr. yan '& Smu-monacb^ OnEttt'k -lilt .J till . £ yn- Sllua.^C-p^J^T^R.. £ tetar. Ou. l&. tTlocL?. Mi i. hfc. ^ ~T(l[g eyb -cat ]un GA^c 1 .7AvCcWaW beee.^ urn? loltn fe^ejH". tta.c jtibnw. e una caryyc. wM ox Mi. t>w bnb. n. .e.uil.{bl&-^U-Mjxi. StLua -c: yoYc- TXb .^pofb- y nature. jxu.li&^fV.fot'. maSo-X^in. li&.Tra-m raidrc^#ct• ti^-it.frtu£mmuf. Jfde ep^-W Otacloartfr -^-Vi. folmffe ttcfttlXf. 7-m ^tn^.-rh.e .M car ■ In cinu> iunr.'uy^ciii.cuHi / ai .TCVi-tird' bmr .. . ~|0e ep5 rer/£3 £tllHoeVl ^ .^ .ut. (olinffe t'. & •£/? wa? urnr7 AmiC Tp. ^ 111. In^nui.e utu.yc- utte cu M. bor^ bmr'. u.-^crui-Jt-Tnnltn JW-ac fn- Tlftie to/ iMrioUt - An. felinffe Jeff I'-Ri jiAmiS 1 Gtin.-ria-^.u-ar l-ntjtiw.e- mw.^Oi.uiBilmtr'^ ibi-i-ca^ Ibijrct^yiHi- (trui.7mr. & pn.Silua V Y0. p^c’. 7Rl.7poft/i«,l®. £.fi£ 7 m .«»• 7 ^V- ii.yAtm& T^a-c .vu. ^aj*ln^ mu (unc-i 11 ■ G^.y^v.^utti diwiadbrn;^ i.ar?ki < ^ 7 n.fmiij 7 T(w-^fei, W ir* 7 ltluj V. ^'SP-^W;nfua[eLLf nf0e a,s-ren ({utowt tf. ^ folmf fcjeft V-8.E■ _ y ,n ^rt-C’.^ct;. tar !n dmo fuiTr. 7 . ap’ /x:L. u itri - ai 4 cconi. borf l^ja.ar Iln B&^.(ow. 7 imnuJinV ^d,. ffijffLM fi,Sihu.-f°fc nM.Vm. U6J rn ,p ■ fpx nil. car-In imo (tmc'fi.tafvT'i- tuffi cu. in. car ■ lii-t acpn. -iit. ™ttra 'Sa. 3 ».fcl>i- / t l £,7 poftr ualeS .<«• 'ffC-1$. ' ^ ~T h ^pce^gSTfe' lialnuc epf^ fo^ltuc inanfutaf cju^ win^ fra.nderbcne7 Borcfteie t>L tnanena XR.C .7 pofb. ‘'u m. lib. m ualefT. Mi i.ti^.^rajn jpanuu paicluntT'-pO *lt^ 7^tu* (rftV nil- Acna/ ^ «. folmf.7 m^pTTtl?. Tta.S.W. car- Witte fomt.il.car 7pc.uittt cu.c-bm^ bntoaum camefY.R.E. emtcillub cte' duel? b>^ik qui eurenw de co ignorance ^za-^ I^rc ueniltao. pcjlmobti ft feanarrre' ^. r^- ^itatwcinaurr / ill ub UnfrarcXccja ba wcenf^ eptn• ar in Aritft m faifrca. |*o fen Hf jeeia. Jfl£ it. {nlmfle - As^.y m ft urw folm. tja-e-m- carJn^nw. z u.. {blin V una caribt.7x. uttix cu.u.caf/ Ibi ecdct. 7 i.feruuf.7'S. a? ^a.7Sttua. xparc^R-t .ypeftrb /u^.>«.7^Wt^. ^fde gp5 iW fSHD iIaM &^ R.£. fg Rejd^p.Ol-iolinf 7^.u/. 7- e Vi. can I-n Anto funr. it. car.7x- (21) CbEfrt'k- femi Epi Saiocensis. h kaf Be &wfewt r - jn XAr o iatt W<^. tr ep v Daiocenft -atri \)uaa he? porch baGglfl. S) dtmiSio fobn le defX. -fpa. c. ^ )n drt to feme. 1 i. caf -'7 Jam. uifft c^ui.Iim^1yivaMi.c^.UM.ii!.1m./^ & ya^7un mottihe.yx. fotf.^unaitena flay dc.V. pore. "(at &> uJ &.#nio font. in.ypoocui. tutft di.iu.fwi# hire' ^ct it. can Jin ur? mMycX-Urui./pcLdcpa.^iia Ui-ponyV- yifcdnphe.pooc.ierl.y^. que ferwr^ baila. ^unaf/eSa <3ev. fAfinmuimt. fcebtua buf&xemaf Ricarf tnfud lemu a&.uak, uu.&llS. km fi ual# ;x». lie. uir jjoocit. 1^. TErrSe epo- gRcUt- ^ imo fotmfr ckp- Tja.e In driio (u.TTC.'fi. Cdjr.ypC. utifi cu. Vi. bnr. ui. ca.f. Ik. ill. fmuyfiLu .pc.'port*, ice n> ualtd >• in. [&. y m.C■ {dfc.^uehXmuhefrenuic? J^abviprerf it q/o ■ &&imbMC. .. J p dim# folio. Tja.c. i. 01 * 7 iti .c cu. nn.bor£yu -fdmin 7 ibi.i.molm de.^iii.foturtu ?toy. i. Jfr) u^o'Se parr ten dr ejV -k- S - S - f -^p mVEolwf fcSejtl'. Tja.e Induio.euna cajy 7 ^cn.uittt cu.vm. boj# brrr'jn. car Ik qdi"mtlcf bnf .Vm. uri Qniofyanabaf. yrja dh una car. praerlioc Etc foi^.u.boa-tenerittf / di fobn. cjtii irec^uoybet/fmeXicema ■ Vna-^a iwcar kdde^aliaSarnimef.tpi.e tk.a^tuua.f( “7 dppcixo'.xx- fob Alfa a) dppci abar .Vi \X&y vn fimthc. Kicaftf Ten'beton^ri^e^ct- fct.dppcuf. ^jpcVc mde. 11 . daiaf. cjup a.ppctdnv'Mi. fof. Oadnc •tmuir' ^^ereje-E. «flWPR.of W UUfffeESVMe^ uno fttn fe dej^. V^.e In imo.e una tar 7mi. uiftt cauno cathrw li. cap Ik. <01,. faui.y Ct. ac pa|£ut^. Sdua.pcc.pon?. jCdo yecepfualeb.Jx.fot.jm.c. fof. &jpc l ic m manulua ajji uaf .^.fotrS'- E’fpre' aV'tenure' dep^e.C. JD/fdy 7 A, 3 Er? Jt v dep. Tja.e. k^mo.e una ualuir.m-liby’ni Xt. fol^- kepinc^ Tenure.ypotutc (e uqtere quo uclurt'. "T^jnfcb^lE^de fof to/ T aRf KT be epo-^dim’’fobn 1 cdejE - . Tpt. c ■ t. catty juL In dfuo.C una.y im-uittt cu. lui.bo^tbvr.i.car.lbi-in.a!S fn.yn-molmi'hejwitt. {cd'.Silua .in • porc.^,pc\}c , 'h&i^p cb pjriouo^onoe^i qd'uaT-pc. dena/Yotu dim idUn fe Tja- < ■ ca ty dim#. Ik. V. uttti7 O-boiX 7un mora de-jw. foI#.|bt. j n. ac pn yi■ Peru 7 , lorucn lulurrlt^. Idt'^-modo-J^e-mliX. 0fieri/ xenurr^e p^e f ■ Xnfcfnalb 7 ten ^ epc li ctiTwC - ^ p uno^m^ ( 22 ) C^ENtfe- tit. cap r _. ___ 7 V/j- pn. Wi jpxfa.e .J f&ua. uv pcf^Letlrc^pi - f?./»ru> epi -tanr (Hue 3eu(b? . crXuafe .Vla/IeaT tfet fumr. uu. \opiy an mM beM fat. nouo % dono cyi ram ftW 3 e tfbi S). cjXiiat. ualutr. tin .li£>. 7 in .vi.life’. Gebet'be&pri'ctsnuir. vperure (e ueitere cu l?acxja cjuo uolutr. {eh AnfcljcaU?ren be epe t ne&ch dxm& foiin-lfaz un car- 7 ifei zirtbn\ofJ vu i- utHi cu.Vtt>criTirifc.i.ef ^CV- fd’.ypc. ac pa-Stlua .V. pert/, lorn, cn ualutc.^l. fSC.y &.J#.0ttbruj rmwt'Sey^e. | fde dtifdiratlfTen deepo vne&ck and foirn- Vja.e in.caf. hi <£»£> cjfe un&Go/‘.y.'«C 3 l , C 6 C -. ^p.u. (blu^uno UU50 (edejrfe.Tja. V. cap IifStme una car77»/«' 1 * 1 ^ yu.\u.\?ot& hvtr.tm. cap 1{> V filtU. C- per/YE..E 7 ualcfe .jjc . IS.jCSo pecep/cmlife. ymxrtccL.ytvrn cjut-ten yedd'.^cu-bt. Bp*:t cittr -tenure'Se paje.t. ^ —•-* la it’Ut., Wlencstuci T i w£ J . % 3 .e al^eix 7 “ten’ de epc f^ccKfc'Ui uno (olin le de|H^. T^a-e'- I n yinoX urul caj ^7 aimf&.ypc. attti cd -pc. horct litre, it. car.T'dim'! t . moltn^e.^cu. Icl^. Silua. in. per/TR.£. ualefe .tin. ItfeScSefec^.^ in. life^w.c.(els’, jlluuardTenure be paje.£. nulp de lid^iti^.-rer/de epc CtRE gf ci -. ^p.ti.leltnriedej^'. Tja.e Jn^nTejunr.i 1.oaf! y uilh cu.nu. t?nt;*»u-caf Iti.^m.(efut.Tuna pxlh.Yun inoltn ix toc. den.Tunafilua. d^vx^ord'T £. uAefe. ef&. -paZ. J ■n'bmo.e.t. caf.7Vtt.udll cu.Vt. WSliftr 1ml car. Ibt qcd&ryvmn ac ytv.ym.zc paftut^'- Y.R. A-7peprualtS .uu.IS7 tn.iti. IS. Uuncxcntirciic^c. ~Tfde XtiTdi tolP-ccn^e ep alia -Cibttt. f dm/ Glmfe 3ej^ ’-%yxx ]^' 2 >nZ>.e-unacaf.7 Vii.mlfi cii.V. hire.t• cafftbi-i. mettn 'Secjclu-^ertyV- (erui.Stlua• vtt.pfd. Yfl-Ey 7 pojferltalutc. mi. \£.j°nr / uii&. fbeXXnob ede. b/W-tj^W.u. cn PfL.B.yw funt'inutio.fh. Aluunftenarc Jh btftUDLO Icr r T^e Sv5Tb f ( €. 1 t 4 GaCMVlC 1 -r VH fr yi liftacenfts ren'be. ep/ batecTi (?p.EHV rg-,^p.ii. Gluts fc dej^Tpa.^ Jn^molunr.ti.£aT^ 7 i ^Xnii.taSiliTte' mi. car7tni."fe«n^7i-cfl^7 v.Tefut.lfei/iut. weS be.\pce-fdt. ye>Cc.u. P&yn.y^.sfc ydSpL-tjpJSkxa..pe. yord tji. 11. Gltnf Y.R.T. )W- u. da-Vnu Txnutrd9qwl^7aLu Bpxt- 7 111 in uno.Y.hXy yo^^ju^MjAft Vttt.lS. 7 mo^o, appctanc'.pctt.tS. J^awie -cen’decpc Al'f’G - bXr une (bltnyfanf fedefiktfa, 0 OducAr.\nbruo (unr-u. car.yptl. it. uitu cu -^x\Soop( bm .pc 1. caf. Ifei .jk. ferut ypoc u. id pn.SduaX.fot^ YR.£.iulefe.yci.lS 5 ^dcfa^rlj•>■■ t»c pn.etuia* "Ke. pcnc. YR.E.ual^.c.G£. 5 cde ifeay/iiu-litym.C.fot- AnCchd Tenure'ber xeap- 9 - wjnrr-atccfr be Scuuat xen beepo lc -€- . ^ dun' Glin (e be|A. tm.cap ln'bnto(unr.u.cai^>«.utHlcu.ii.Q 3 c linr.ti.Gif'.'. Ifet.u.ftfut7 ^•^^■Stuta.j’C.pn^TJeyge- YR .tycybo epfpecept'Udf.tit.lffe. Itloic/c.Gu Aluuintenun ‘^ 6 fl«*f Ojeru OftWf.n uru> fclw fedej^'.Tia.e.v.car. In'bmc.e.t.cafy'^ii.Ywi bnf.m. Gaf.lbMi.rmt1.7Vm. ac fa.Sdua.G. fon/ YR.£.7po{t.7-mobc.*uab .Vu-iS. V)--■ lane tpa ren nep Jp 1 / y ——~ vvv. wyaiiv La .u.ftifui. manentf. (ocbutn^Aluuari- ~1 f& Wittfreri' "bceyo -G &A.1 ■ ■ £ dim S' fclrn fed^.Tpa.e 7 In dmc.euna cap ’Vut.rtittt cu.t. &/pbw$yuu.coc.J\ .moltn'b^.X'fol^. jh.un’riru./ uu.lSr/fc^ m .\&. T ftoAo/tm • V6- Gjtain tm urtfdz peyr. £. nfctnxlF-ten*'Sc erb C&ocT , Vta€-: i punc {bhty 7 uno nt/je mcbilc. fed. in. uiKt^uu.btni' ill fuirc' "T. ft. E ^ 7 pcifi ualctac. C. ^1X7 m .Vi. Itf. Aiuuirrrenurtr' banc tpi be p^t. € ‘ay . ma.minoc-tett'ie epX CetSrbX.^ .mi. foluiffebep(. ■fpj,e • ^C- car. In dtuo funt.11 n.TtfV. uittl cu.Vi .bc^ f ijt Vi- car. (bt pxkA.Jpcu femi.7 it. molim 'Se.jyctuj.foliS’r/n. War Silua. ^cl. porcX a. £. uM .yx-l&./poftrxvi. lit. Ifbdtf .'TOC tilt- Ilf. llfde Gi{U&c 0 mn Ae epo CfrW 47 ^b t mt# folinftdefft. XpX.v: In Amo.z.i.car-yun. uitfl ai. 1. cap lbt ftltu/ V. povc- T. ft.£ .7 pojb." ualeb . t^.fof. mbbo.^t . fcTit. Stepne bwj-a tenutr btpt^e- f. uov nepcf toerlxa -cerf de epc SENvliHag^ p uno folin ^7 dm? ft dejrf. -rpj.e? Jnbrue fttnr. 11.caK77cc.u1H1 cu. u .car. Ibi yc£ujyc .ferui .y'Vi- ac pa.jyoc. at pajkirjr $ tUu. .Vm. per/ " 1 . ft. E. ualef. Vi 11. lif .^pojlPci • ItS". ITIc>SoTLm fe'AejX. J Tja.e.ui. ca/. Indinojuntr,11.77V. uittl cu.uXorXhnt' .i- carVdini^- lbi pcc^Vii-femi-7hrnii'niolin/uva' dena Xe.7ic.fdf. ^duA/^ Vm. pbtt/ 7 una aepn. T , .B,.£. ual^.e.fjf.^Cdc Tecep^"]pcSoi- Hldbo.^t.fcliX. Vluric renurt' be AXnoA cite. I^aimd tW epo uno {olxn ftddd’. tja.X mi.tarln dmc fu.nc. u -7 7&- uiHi cu.V.find’^rrtr.m.caX [f»i 7 ^ai 7 Vi. {emu^/un mJxn Ac.j&Xol&y’vtu.dcpa. -7^ox.V. Ac pa^urp. Stlaa. Vi. por^. T^Rx.*uaI^-.Vm. ti^-Scdc )*eccp/<;.fdf. ITidbo.Vui.lif. Sternxtnunr' ckfrap-lr- iX7; r tujpf Tfa-e.i* caf i ^n^wo.i.( ucp. ‘ f ~|fi a^utp 7 fU^uitolbi ten Vepo -dluUaSa vp.tii. juo?f ^ jn'btnb.t.i.ca|y7Vn. uiittcu-xnn- bovd\yrtc. 1 . caf. Ibt. i. fm^Xi- a 2 pa. S tlua.^c.pcre! T?IL£. 7 pofk^tiald?.tti. Itf. tTTdba .uu.liS. ft.ic.iro cj.ira/ uifualeuua.'^cV-bcif. Hi’C vi-fol/f ~7<. den^p ncuc jarnif fcltn {edefd’-fpi.e jndriro. z.t caf!7 u-n\iiKf ca.nii. tortf b-ntr.m. 7 ^ 711 - ferui. "7v. at m.7una ic pafnip-T R..£. iidLzfc.yc. fbf. / 7 Cic fvjcepr 2 ooe.fbt.Il^odo/^L. fdf. ^obnc rv^cepr -cenanr be ... - V ^'^• Jfle b ucp tet/de epc Kl t 'Se g- v p .m. (bUrX/Atn^ {e dcj^. -fjae. V. caf.j n dim? funr.fi.- mitt cu ti.bordC lone.iu- cap, Ibi tpa&bJX. ferui7'- ,r >din de.pc. fof."Tpr. at pa. S itua. V. pare. * 1 . ii.£. aaL^ Vni-ltf-Scdo recepre- fot. ITlcbo .Vi. Iif.Ajamc ■cenuttbtp^e.^. ~lfd& bp^o ten deep Otrl o ib. ^p ancfolmfedep. Tia.e.in. ca/jnbnuj niclotl.jti .Vi.tuffl cu.i.oot^ Initr. n. car-Xti. 1 • molm be. L • den? 7 i 11. ferui .ytm • Xc p • S itua • < ?c. po\d. T? ft .£. ualw .jcl. fdf.^C do peccp^pccXdt. VTLodo/yxx- frf. Gobnetenurdde jt^.£ j^annulp becotdbdfxendeepo fs s i'bi'Ht' - . ^ jp uno folin fe befif.*rp.e. Jn bnic. tuna cap. V^Cpc - uiKf cu.in. fmr. in. cip!jt7i in.ferui. 4 vm. Xc ptiXft.£^uaf. m-Iif.^Cdo receprnndif. llldbc, V. lit. Leuuirftenure. ZEo 0 ^ l acin ? ten ab ji nna 3 epenje ‘Tdr’iKT'vN ir. "bencue dencepi taicc?^dun fdlin fedcp'.lja.e. uni 7 cap/bim? jnbiTic-e unayfivutdi cu.pxWr^' tntrlnn/ cap. Itn. inj.lejtu/7'V-ac pa-Siiua.u.pcrc? t R.E. ual^.^idt^dcreccf,.^ • Vtnob tenant dt p^e- £. ^ |fbe Rcdt 7 Tcn\n Tenmuntabjirmabep^e. 1. iu^u. Atjkib. ebe^ ncuc'bcnc tpifaioclfifi ml-tnifi.ti.ic • Val^ 7 ualu rc Gdb aiirtenu rtbt• £ • Radutf* 1 ' f rn^Cpo fbbiHTV M^-.^p. 11 • folmf fedef^ 4 fa.e .V.ear. In "briicfunudi dj Vi. uitfi cu AX.-bcrX'bne.i. oaf- Iti prdxy^.fefuib/ u-molim ^e.XiSol&yu-dentjxu.dcyxi.Silu.a/jC.pci'c- 1 ?^.£: uat So .V111. lif-Scdc pecep.^c-fat. Ulobo-'ci Uf- A^tlped tenurtT dt pejt-f- CbeNYb. fUf'Tufti&i.TKrf^eepo ■ g fi C -l ^ - X i W C^p uno fohrytn. tucpf friefrf.Yp-e'.iin. caf.Jnbmo.# attey 7 pOC\- utHf oa .u.ho/t'hw.u. caf. tbi eac&.Vi. rnolw ^^ljX-^^7hedd,d^ pxSolM. y m-fepu.Y.fLE. uai do. ifu.l&.y’pofb-''iiii.U&.fTL&o. Vt-lt^Ki cx$ c^txer /mfua leuuav'-fot in urufdua. ~J)ifie Ikadat^een de epo /\vumn corn xenatc'. tf bCgC>m 4 £ ^p li- folmlybimibioybiTn tujjpfeiejS’. *rp.c. hunJlu7pc ’. tlWo. cm. lit. fGuarSf cpf be" ir> fua kniua.^W-Aen* [^•ten infua.Tnanu jrrr ciunatz EvouecejVAm. dorft. £L&\)oc cr> yen. oC ejuibf \jt. pc. foty pendent Zh zXfS jxlf luomfTeA deepo i> RACE' S Tcuumn ii. folmfy uno w^ofedej^./ja-e.uu.tai'.jnhnto ejtuna./'tni. uitfe at ViM.fmuffmr .ii.loueffbii*a:&. pi.beeLifYfi.E. ualetyc-kb pecepC^ttudc. tlUo . V)£7a tr> juer fn.<.r> f.fLE. leunyVluutn 7 pGoduin t&mef. tic eft m ana. J^fadArtf W Aeepo MaYESV£ o yp. 11 - fotmffer' deftt-T^..^. u-CAp'-Jn'Siuo.turia.yiibi .un.boydyjpd yuu-herm. StItia..iu.parc'T^R..E. ualeS.mi. Im- 'XAo f ecep.*tn.ttb-IDodo,I , ‘ •l'®- ITlo&o. tm. llicaj^eTo-nekijeC fot uat.Vlurw _ Tenurcr Ae ddnoi> cdc. i ^P^aSalpt^CarbeTpineJxm he et» 6€&Ui46£ r p.‘s7i.1oUtirieie|^.^|a.5. InWio.e unacar. Jfr. utlfc cd &iu.boi& bnr.Ci.caf.l'bt ycckd~J 8 ±>.Cu (oltni^fe - I fie ^bhujj^ren' de epo ^ ^ Cm. ear. In diuo furxe. u^w.tutt poc.hordC hire .Ci.tar. \hiycckdy yuaf.yn. foI&- S <3C m Tenure Uuuirf |n llWc/- trjijnf ten ^he ep^ p€cbcl> g k ^.n. folinffsie^ ^rpa.e. ci. tar^jn 6nu>.S’ unaTpcii- uttB \)ttc. v. c&r? 7cm. Wi'i’7.0-ferui.7i-.i.ic -pa-Situa-pc.pon:’TR..£. yvojhc ual do peu-Vo. ulohoT^uiddo. K&c^d/he 1 7) 7 yTmjpa'jfli.iA.j t)en.lf ubt rnztniyT'. 1111 . uicti fo'." it’umt?xenuft ■ lall'iF'iz'nonctrnav zza ziazj' 1 taa.sla^Z’-4 1, a;. fa[inf{i ■%p.i-jcu.ap. JnJmofuTO.fi.7pcl On. uife cupcc.krf arfc.^c. aif. lb;^■ fercu■ 7 i i• molim Ar-jci. Ibliti'. ' 7 JCI 1 . pifiari/'ie.vu.fcia^a. Jmy/pcii.ic fn-SiIua. l^:. pzzrcf'llR, ,t.7po)f.7nibSa. uit.Wci®. bieuaxmurcdejtge .. ^TunztinaW.Vepbb;;mJ Ibhn jnfg.'cb ch. H G t ■ ■ ' " u ■■ XvSutpflf_ ^ . , TI .{.-ffinutf.ii. uK; hazf’7 rri (imitrt’y’urf.poc. fbf. lest 1 cc e lfaptb. Jn^AcliB l t'gAN UW . "P\_ UVLr7 cfi'15^ rm/tlc eyw Tcvebt uno iucjo {e i^.T’^r.i-my'ibi.'iwimc.Jpxii^iini.u. pfo. Cat 7 iutuitfft.pc«.&t.fjfieunTKnuir Je'ftge;. :b ucjt> nepofijerBa tenie vfo Jt l tl l r)oR5£ b JlRURPCS^^f-ii-C»Unf fete(a.T|a.g.ci- >ar- wmo pccui- uittt cu .pc. hor£ bwtr. lm-taf-lbiyofa Vpct- ferui.yu.moltni de pa. folrb'yci. ieny^n. ac pa . Tulaa. pec. part K • £ •" iul^ -pc- [dd. 5 c do recep/vi 11 ddd JUodo/pc.ldo. 0 fuuarb 0 Tenure depar t. ~lfie \)uop Ten de epa ftRFBVPtNCy pnnojolni fcctgju. au czr.)n dnio tin.uiHi cu. i.c&yydxmxb- y. rr. nialim 'hef.pd.dcnX&.h . uale^.un .l&.pafl ymrtit lib. d.Umm tenure 'he (bcduirta. "jjfje buy tenge'ept -1* luau m yiti Trt iimi^ car cti.i. bai«y V- {enuf /7 ana <3e pay dim. / Vat’y aalurt {ejg.pocSX. Alum t£ ten arc'be Goiumo comrte ~| T&g bu^pyJXdA^ GLmepr?rentdt epo -^ at'&gNfSTf bl-. yp uno folin he car. Iti'Snio in.uitfi l7TTr.C11.touef.lln pxbd 7 mdcpaydm^/ yfiloa- u-pofc. /Ic&yaAurt'[ep.pQC.$‘ l euuitf Tenure depeajz.t. lolb xen de epo Cgl€&C6^ ).m.fclinf leiej^ “fya-B J pen . CZLf.lndm0 funr'.ti. car-jpcc Cm. mWi cu.CuuheY& lffrc' fJti. of. tbiyadkypevut. jerui. Iti. n. append uin^. VViit.dc pa. Silua.^. pofety V. mohni utlLanmi-. ^ / U.E. ujUt>.pcvul (&.SimtltA afio ptcep.\Wobo.pcc. life’. yearn pxLdtr.pecv.ltfc. Lmuxtirenunr'. / \eh\oc$) Hrabt STolxn.cjXuJ/.pc.hX- ypjXcahno pardn epl hdioc. Gniei’beo^Vif.iut.^enaf. 'be' tfio m. cjue uaf .poc.folift ’ nlqpr 7 be 1 Houecejr Ten' ie ep^ A cDtrtTbHS . . 11 . folvnf "fe Tja. e. 1 u. catyiimi^. [nb-mo funt/iy * Hjfie An^otnW ^eepo Sr . v - biH 6 EBVR Q g y .u. fotnffeiej^ T^a e 1 nbnio.e'.i.capy 7 C. uitti cuy-torAKrtr.«. car- ltyciA7ii.feruii7i- molin V-J^.iin.W.Stlua.xc-porc. -Ti’-K-i-y' pojl.iulurr.mi.Ut. TTlobo.Vi.lit. Elueuarenurr^ey^e.E. J) ^jbpory-°^- AlHoi-rfiM€ < jp.iii.fo'linf feiepf.-^a.e Cm. eaf.ln imo funtr.it.c^7xcili.w® cu.Ci .toji’bnt Ci-dp.lbi jjccfay'Vm.ferui. y u.molimy'^iindexvu * • x / 5 i (jtftfttv Ikt.tf.Ae pnbitua .jSLt.pond~/-ii.k. uAJo-X - m ' TC.1iV.7xaw fixldcc.sCur- cjdo |*C^p • Wcdo • , Vuuc a} abiacejl’. ui. manftonef ^Cp w R-ouecefke^ - 7 peddt fJ- fo ^ p^2 •£. ^J£ 6 T 6g l^€ ^ unofolm frd^d’.Y|U.e.m. af’ ~j dtm^. jn dtiio funT-ft.7 qda pancuy cu.^.jxi^if 7i.Void. dnf 4. carpditn^. lbi.V.fq*ui.7i.ac pa- ^Un m pane^tn cantuana.Y Ad . una bom. peddab.^OC^- deruf. uto nepof keifaWde cpol fifc’c ' UC . p)uiiofoIin- 7p e Aejd. -TjU-e. it- cap.Jnbnio nichil- feb'-V. uitK knt.t.caftk.Tii-ac pn.Silua.,x».pordlbiea*{^. Y A d C7 pofr^uaU’V .Cl 11. (lb- TO obo .*^01 • tif. Aluuirf-cejuirtTbc' Gpdutno. J die b u^n ten* de epo G ubT^ftt^-p uno folm {V ' dejd’.fta.f.n. car. InbnYo.euna. 7 sr.uiHt bnf.i-caf vdim^Ik ecdA.7ii.ferui. 7 n. ac pn. 7 fdua-X. pote- 'Y.RY-ppofi.7ntobor1tik.itn. Id. tbuuirf-xenunY de p^e- E.ppotunr tfe cu^£i {ua c^uo uoluttr^ — |{df buepten^de epb l^ftNclitlLC&irt’ACt Ypdimdloltn fedejd'.-^a.e.t. caf. 7 ibi.e mlimo ' cTt.1 1 1 .feruif-reara.^ftlua.<’.jiotf. 7 YB.Y. mean xuarta.in.bonfptineV l?uiccn peddnjr.^ctl*^ 1- 7 ot Y. R. 6 . tialeb. C. fY-y 7 po|l. 77 no'So-*' ,xd .fof. ^Uuetr-cenut^de fdzpotutt ire ^uoltbutp | fde bu^o -ted- be cpe>“ T fi?T^» dtm^ folin ' fedefifYrja.f.t-caf - 7 tki-etnbtno.ctt.i .uiWyyuno \>oYA-y tt-fermf. Ibt/tiu.ac pn.yftlua. iin-ponf Y-K.-Eypofl-p-mfu^ ^vl-lox. Vluiertenunrie]*^. E. ^Joifins ^ct^rTei/bcepo-dT^bx^p uno\olm~ r uno uyofe dejd'.-^a/.f. n-car/dim^Jn bmb.e una.7ia’.utHi at. i n. bold’ lint. i- car-Ik ecdl.piI• fer ul .7!• Wolm be.s’. fol;V. pm. ic pT.Stlua.cui. pord YR.t.ualeS.uti.lik^Cbo r-apYiudd IT]od?4in.Id. Aluun?tenun:SejiMe-f. 7» Jy 7 UinWabfirma ■ beaOftm^ AbeLlbuf ■tenurr de epc.^p uno folm !e '.Ypj.e Inkno ettna tar.7 ,,iUl ^ cu.i-Void btrr. ii.aaUa. 7 'Vi.uu. 3 c Alurftenutr ArGodumo. Tde Rorfe’W abfirml-VftWik- Ibekt^cenurcbeepY it uno (olm fedefE-rpic Inbmo lurrr^i. ca ^7 < ^,uvHt cu.X-botd' Itvtc• 1. ctf/dim*. lbt-t.trtolin de.Ot.foliY y Om.dttnVpaftuiu ppyw. {oV. lln-^cii ■ lerm7'^ 1l -ac- pa.Stlua.^. pond pRY.tpo^V. uat utt-lw* ^l. c -Gld. iluuin 7 xmurc be Godmno.biuccdpnYcp^ba Idqa rja ab.tu.Voucl''.puak .G.foV.^ D abulf 7 curdeipme -ten'de epoYoRNPrnfc^p ni.lolinj ledeJcT.Yfa.e.^ui.car-InbriTo eunaT^t-utlfecttacwni. iwl kntf.im, oi f: ItiteWpi ■ rnoUK^-V*- {bld.Tim.dcpnbtltia pci-pore- "YR.Ejppojl cualtd. pc. Id. Tflobo 7:11 .ItV^Ttafri pedaTcm 1. Stern Viaa-omuir depose-f. lld'^adulfter/dee^ folmfe'bep: 7]U-e j n biiio. e 1 una caf. 7 u. uittt cu . 1 .Votdp’i 1 • fenu- 7 wna Ac pntdimd. Silua. Vt. potc.TLf pmobo/u^. pc»c. M. SVepn bt^atomic dr pgeA. Vi- folmf fedeJ&Tja.e'.XVi-or/ pojtrtiiluir pai.U^. nWo.^cc.l^y'wnfi^ XXO.U&. God utn° -rznutP. ^ |l 4 IcST'PE ElitSrofib - Jn iW'>CeC 3 , lUt Uwj 0- - TGilittf 4ttv-tab* Vde> epo *-Ue-JW Palm f - 7 UT 10 wpJiVp-fa* ^ ~ In Wer-unacdf bntr.u- cap^lbl-XU. dc jot- Stliu-i-poTC- ^TR.Ei/poP?. lulurc. n \S& .Jvn J? 0 c.{ob. Gociftc'renurc' de" pe^e.£• ^.vfyrt? j folm t err IXa^nepYuuju de ej/o in cp pitypf- "f! R .£.7 ja^./nidSor'iuL ktem Xvfifxvc xen ie epo _ jp. u.-foUnt Jedejtt Tja.e;. n. cap .7ibi tune m dim at vn-bopd! (bi ana pilcaPU'Se'. 11 .foltt. YR.fy'pojIr' mlurr.C. fol#. IRAo■ CjC- Glit. ilnfclnlxoiuir hepa^St. V pier Baicclil -ten mSmo boV r — ct • 1 • P°bnf fe^ 7. H.E 7 ni^ .-we. m. Tja.d.t. cap ]n 1 mo funccuij.^c.uifii.iu.niiif cu.^C \.ccvV>pxr ^cl.iii. cap. Ibi M^o^y'jat-f'enu.Vxxx.ti. ic pm. Silua. pooc.porc. lieu d> 'I'.R.-E. ual^.Lx-tiK.V^ epspecep/fimiltr, ~jm&o Tnak.y-&cm qm eu ran paddtP c7jciu.l& Iqui acvt jmnc&JX- don ?'in Roueccjl aunanJy'V/- C)Ii^ ptddS. tic Mifune', hoo&tinutt'&oduwcomef. e boo a) tan RucajtPdeYcriebruje dimit”Win . ^filua .jxx:. -porc.7R.fy 7 poft.-r-moSo Puatxl -folit. ^ 2\.Sa jltiwf loobu ter/Se cot &> un tolmy'un uuru dc'epo. ~ 7 ilnlir an boe?indtnodmn?>cap7iui.utHofmdnn cap '7 uno cotSOdCj u£uxc.jQ(X.fch%. ^Lnfcbral Srt^fen deiipfotn. ill. {obnf.7Vbifir in 3iho . t. ca.p^7 V- utHt cti.jXu. cor Vjfhr.t. Cif “’dim! Ibi-^fmn • 7 unmolin’ dtr.^;. folu^.T^u. ic pa-7ii.ptfcaf. dcV-lo^ 7R.f y poj^r. ual^ .Vi. lib. lT)odo. VlJi^-7 v.fctid’. y epo-t- iu^u m fi t ipA. jfl~K’i^F »t>€ T^a-£ Ibi I 7 dun’rit^cu-ii- feratf.^iui.acrpti- yitm# ptfeana finc'ceniu. Silua^ci. pofc- /^V'.fdK 7fi.f. . Vi • (bP.y pofr/o. . IDo^fX-fot Ttam pedd* Godtnc 7 'c«i u t ,cX dt paje:. f • ^ annulPbe Colubdf -mPde epo unojolm fedejd’ T^.c.itu .ca^fKann nxen nifi.m.u^a ^^ 1 litxn dnuj.i cary^c.uittbfou.tiu. cor bnr. m* cap^ ltn C<3cti.7Cil.fenu.7i.nu>lm de.V.Gf.T^.ac ^-SltiU- XV. poit-7R.E.y p^(r." modo^utl ,Vn. IrB. dlnob^n^K' T'tbi Ur. 1 . c3? cu.VC. feruif./id• pti.Stlud• un • potfd ^ / hR.f/ 7 ^^- i XC. Pd'. ITlodo'7'’d .folia. Aln^ienutr dqxjc.t. J^aimo t«j/ de tpo MCbC 5 T^ 0 C . 4 J.in. Glinf fedefd!Tfax Vi • atf! jn druo.^ 1111^.7^1111. uttu l irrf caf. Ibi taSk-. ■yX HU. fcrai .7n. molim h&pcuii-iohd'r/pifc^p^ be-ibffi. 7oit- ac pa. Silua-.x^.^-f^' Y.R.f .uale^.vin.tfK / 7 pofl VDoSo.^i 11 • t ^7 V- lot. Hopman xgnutc^e^ge'.f. 'De'iffe3) l?c epOov lot.^.ii.Ua^af ~jp^adulp 7 fUffutaldt Wi dr U ydMfOCDH b& &. j3.ti. fblmf lb defd'. Tfa.7.0'. caf. Jn dnfo (untr.1i.7Vi. uiHf oi .0'iu.botft bnr'.m. caf. Ibi ecd^,7n.molmtde:iu.folro. -yfj. a7pa.7 bifctna V.xX-in^uilf. Stlua. fi- fore' ?XIX .7pdfl ualutr.^b. fd&nUorVt.l#. leucuatenure dr'j^e- 1 . buicm J&tacejC-mi-bd^pivauttste.pdX^n. a. uapheXnziboue renhe'apo OTKlH^^R -' ^ .^p.n.folmf ft’dej^.tja.e.mi.ca/ln dmo-e uru /7 yc. uiHt dl.miy bord* bfir. 11.cap! Ibi. ill. (erui/ 7 i-motin fe.wi. detup -JWi.Ji Ja.Silua.il. porc^YLt,jpojftualunr.1111.lit- mo^c.fol^. Go^il Taiurtr'dtr-p^.E. -miurr deepo XcsY t M. 7 Bj&P mWadfiima. ^ uno (olin fe'Scj^- ] n dtiio fane.b. ap'-dim &■ 7’Vu.uittl cu.Miiloo$ bnt'.i.ajplbi.xii.lenui.n-moltn 7 vut.ic pa.Silua.xc-l 501 '^ r j, erc 3 e.f., o.c. (of. 7 po(l /pc.Cat- \C\cho/c. Gits'.tSuuapFten enutf .in. p4 XCc.i.^-tpb, onanejmf.tidemunu ‘de>. iii.Gt.7viii.dc pa.Silua.XC-^ Y.R.f .ual^.c. 17 ' "'^ ^ banc-cjaWiiucf. ] iUfloU’wnU! , . ^ uno iu£p 3 (e'dcjt^.Tja.e In dtno.B'. I* Cdp 5 co .V- (ej*uif. 7 unJ 4 c pa • f^.tl£.7f$?udurcaix£tt8. lfld^c/p. 1 . (cV. Go^CTcnutc^^Uno3..b^fitiM;SliH JPv_4nuulf6 Co lubid.|'"ccr/- 6 e cpo- 6 tt ? itT)€l -tf .^^punoiucjo fe dcfd’.T'ta-^ 1 nSnio.e utu cap cd V. fepuilTl m.ac pa. S tliu. 111 ■ ponftW. iuUS . 4 C 0 . fatScio P»p: ioc.&f. inyyt.W. f v ,, ft i m rrA^%t.ft.pV;«.nf. Jn.< 7 ifar launxcri adfirTna- &oSClCV .Tia.g-^X*.oap In , , 1 ^ ’ 44 , -j > dniofunr.ui.cap.7xl Vn. uttu ai.xi-Wa Vntr.Xvi.cap. Ibi.nt.molvm de^WVi.fotyoiii. len./jc^ 1 fci' ul - tXX. & pci.Wl.L. pnc^tfl.ypafl. ualarc. ?««■«• i.franc y’-n-o&f^n t adulpfiliVuiaKt W dc ItrclgRorrhd-.^uno foltny’dimY^ dej^. Yyar Indiiio.r.i. capymi. uitti cu ■ till- bopctlmr-u.ca)* Ibi ^ 11 .ferui.^ii- molim hi. 1111 • (olid'-y'u- ^on. Stliia.V.p>opc. YR.f . 7 y>op. ualumxl-ISt. lTlodo.^ -Cot-/ l in 1.Sen' deTonebn^e lie m(ualeuua qd uab.xui.tol'. ^ 7 &ilua l.’p)ony 7 ^y>v lidon ojd’ nat, xvi.dcfi. V) 2 nc r]U Y R.C• -cenuep GoSuny’fSuun 11. oiancf- da ten'ole c^o CglcA -.^.m. fotmf ter defa- Xy^Je: cm cif- In dviio (unr.fi.yjxmi - Ul l^ ou. Vi-bord’ bm: V. cap-Ibt^ad^-^iin.feroi. 7tm mo tin dc .v.(bUd’. y^Ah-Xc pa. I'L b ualeb. vu.Ufc ~y°p -■ ^/c-lblid'. j. {lV5o-^C • t q ai recbtgciu i. li£. b 0 ioc ca efKin marm figiftja u& .on. omn iEunnulf^peupi- 1 fde kbl ten d&epo Glinffc'iefjf! *r|a.<£ •^tii. capIn dvu> func.m. car.yjfo nn.uitftcu . W& bmr A?i. B-febetci. ditnjft folin CedefA. T^a. erdm/car jn dnto.edtm cxf-7 uif uitJTcadiivar: yu-boyA. \bi-t- mol .m-fe.V.fot/ ^^uiritcnun:i t >' YR^poR-Aulurt.^. R. mo^o.^O- fol& J # EssILcK. _1^ adu^p fil ?Tutatei -rer/berep& d^t£tft%_puno Rm IV bej*d: ifee dun tdr/ibicf fur^&buc. 4 AW.acTj£'- Inline, euna tapf 7 Vi • uitti bnr dnrud’ car. Ibi-^u- ac pti-T^H £^ 7 pop/uaiutt'.,\*l - G^-lTloolo."iiu -1$- l)onef tenure ^>c- Sepalbo. xL ril^cn^Ve: froueceRf-ten* ^ dmfGltn 1 - «p [n dino. i una ca/ 711 . uiHi aim ■ fepuif-’R R.£ . Udleb pi xafSxxScfc.fllobo^ pel. (olt^ Gorin' ■cmine - Goduuio. jmulP 7 t>e V)dllin^' -ten’ Se; epo Clwf ^p brrc- 1 . caf^ Iti .or£.7un.& fin. 1. a. tyytf • ualuir. .xv. Q,te.irUaor W . JliwTOn^Sf«iO*U«iiN.^aimiS Un gmuKteme (gii^-Vya.g-i. gif-Titi.e cu.C’-tulivf-yi. gfc lit; wft/ualui-c .JC. QM6, TRoSo?joov. folS. Z^' y\yyca-r-7j? c - yui.bdua.jc. porVTfalina^^Tii. <£map. ta.E^pofV.uale^ .On. Ofuuarft xenurer 7nII ^un molm der- On..folid: Silua. ini. ca-i-fe^o/y.^. -A.£.7f4'.uaiu>r.«„.i 1 t.«*K.«uf De'ifkf Wmrquoi’IrajuSe-port feranaitofuuar^ V. , 71 .^ foW vui! W 7 J lmi S(. r<) f ailUraf 4*te« Jv-*7' j pj & g» -te. i>.ui. rolinrre depr.Yp,* ym.caf! Ind™ w.in.c^/^l mr. utffi di-u.. W hrfe.^.caf. fenf 7„„ tim Vs/xvi .&IK 7 e: 2pauq* ^xrna boef. ‘Ji. acf-cen^- Silua. im.prn*^ _ Ya-t'ual^.xom. 1^-Xjo 7 c -ti£. TD obo.jcix-hfc lT { fe y r BW-ran’inirao Y)a.g.nil. car- m^nic.e uia-Tpr uith ca.ti. Cdf.\bi pZ&a, ~J v. (cfui . S ttua. 00 c. ifforci T^R. £. ualgfc . On -t# . _J J»(tVc.R. ITlodoVoti. l^.yrani piir' . 7 C• ti^- ButriWnure 1 (He eps Ten m dmo 5 ‘ t’elli H < 3 &6 - ^puno tucro [de p^e. £. ie dcj^-Tra-i-cap 7 dimit^. [nco\&bd[-cen d& epo baftftC S ^ p uno GUn itji. c&X- \ribriio.edtmt^ cA.\.~7yc■ uitli bnr-u.td.r- lbi^ocPa^7^iii. {b*ui-7.xui- <^c pci .Svlua. nii.poyc-T^a.r. uale^-0t.liV.^7pofl. im.li^-lTlobcr , C. rd^. A.^r'-Tenure'be raje- £. / DoKaff)£S(oRb ^pieepsten mdnio ^ul^yb a.^un.GlmPfirdej^’.^ ^ rTa-g.^Ci • ca/Inbwo func-.li- cary'^xxrvt.uiHi- diyxx.u- ax’ bt Ttyz- caf. Ibi jxdkyurffin- cjuibarr^l* ^ann. Ibt or ?ipaxcafcy u. nwlmi de'.l - GlSr7u. lalmr dg^ jXXXMi- denary 7 !”- pifcan/ de- in 1 .R^-jZx^x --1 J»n.pajlxiid-^.ccc. ou$y&?oQCi.&mm Situa.rp^?. Vluitlp tenure de - btffMtMo Ir ^ V hi rmtmhbNE ^ . paitUia.-clo.tcc. owq./^gcxei.dTinu - l prc^fi-E.ual^ ja.y.K.'Jcio T JOOC-1& louicft W n 7 n 77 ltlru ' , ty rllfo ’? ; ''f a} ® t, O^caieenuiedlu^?-. .cdcp^e-E. C-ltR. |^)uiccO_pnip ins vi- fol^j yiy.^enap- |^OCii;xKlU*‘ k '*vv— A-bfcuo UcecaikunciSS JirmlluHmlibef^ter^: *u£ Str«i tenure SeAtur^ i! t 44K&fHfe'7 in Cmtra® antunnenfi be ^5 / filiuf bufei < 3 /epb. 111r.1ijmof.7fl.fenf aututaM qu*r rt&krne.Otn-od- 4 t *^ eS Pj*®!.. lb mmo ureter/A* J! 4 ttW*« ^rmGbn Aeik. ■f^.i-cAf/im^jriimo- e ‘unA ■ «• 11 . bori- jbi paruunem’^STCu. ^orif|ja|hiT^. -IV. ■/^ofb.Vw uat. m-lrK- , f / 1(fc b*,mo™%er In Arab W .4 raf.73a.torA' £ ■ 1.1 ■ rafT^ur. jfcfilur |mmW r.ta.t.ruiA;.c.ro 7 f>^ li: - 7 ™ I* 1 *■ > 0 aT^f a..£.tm«qt'Imt 5 enfefraTOuanf 7 u%.*°cp' n ptl Jul ^ o i lrUOClbO IrO iry.- Tfe.e.iX*mi- caf j utiTto funt. v. acrjxlyW* i. uJnurr &Scfic 3d ^■ p^ 001 ^^ byNDr. fUi%i&*tsn Ad efr.t WAdAimflu^up f.. - -..r* -.-». Lnm« 4 i N sy~ mm 1 i-l 13 1 *1 ~. / 1(1 i)L'>X'evtvi iwi y- lUetnr’te amftef -rct-c beOT'a - N -. “f|a.e. C7XC. ^efman -anti • film. 7 ibi Vtr m ^>nio ■ i- capVi i- uittc-fdl in anio.i. utj. 7 1 uAo Teri Ai midi film .7 ibt\ji ttilmio. l. car cu.tni ' bortf.Tm. & pa. VaJ.joc.fi1$. ^efna^T'iei^’^lu^^cno.iin.GtjtifT*^ 1 be 1 in dnio.ui. - ul ^ 1 cu 4 X:t-b'- fit. / jjfTtu Mcficfiant’.R,.?. ual^.C7^.lfi^o-iwp-^. ad\jv m^moriub cAAF S$milrtKfcen fupdica/ /flrnul uab.^cl.^AiS. a- yxSoK. yemetnut ^w/ viu>(w»v -- 1 ^ _ Seticelti fcE«. urttof" ca^ViT'l^mt'Bf^; X.foi ^ 'SeiepIWieUifie^ Jh Sjo i'n 4 o ^5 bVW&- " AimrK folm.Vrljltfpurot.o^'cuwom&.^fu.osr' 4 m EgA e a W , Estke 1 ’W P| a^fulp 1>effatbe.fpin»r''n5n ^e^epo un tu^u m Defp'Cpmr. Jbt una paupeuia tnuliep obolu. V^uaiaitrf^ X-fit bociu^iT. ulp"5e'Cotubd-f reit tbi un ui^u- q& m1?ai‘kf efi? -X 3 MXC .7 nuno ufen pml n farcaurt"- ^ A ^oU?xenun 7 -a«ep - nu Glinffi ^pTfa. e ^ jn ^mo.euna.tan7^«-uttti cu.w .bayit V»nt.">• cox’. ibuit.fifut7’fituuta a^cLmfufa.TR• uat^v-lib.n 1 v \V. Alnob acTzmuc be feejp -f. Q fbn fit iecarb i -cen. Aeep -t-film jn Sfltw e e Lbt l^un uiffni ■pAdeiraJ .it -fif-'T-H.C-ual^J7C. XACTj pofb/m• v Wff-fo£b. AtuumTSJnuixr *T^EV.£. ~J 0 OfbnW de epo popfScUf. tiunofilm fi^. y ' 4 p..<&. Jnbrifi fumr. (1. ^ u " ^£^.1111. bor^.\nxc Jimib'df. Vunc-cfa-oJnu^r'.u. ttKi boefde^tr. £. *^Vuuia rnilefA 1 tim AimuJ" iu^uy 7 itn.frc.t. car in tin 10, locu 7 -R.f. ua.tutr.l7:.fib 7 pi?|l,*2xVff. (ob. ITlobo. C. ^ J^aSitI|^beCurWpine-rCT^ BfViBfllfit AtmiA^ iu^u in popeffilby 7 tbi lie'. 111. bmef. 7 po|t /uaW. 1U1 • (ob. m . fibtf’-Vtuncjiautnr^c^.jf T ulb^xer/ AtJ' btP-bdiT). 1 • Jr 4 6lKt)a -A Gtinf fe AoP’.tia.^.^OOOCU.caf- jn Apufanc- m• car- w ylii.uitti cu-ooff on/ bnc.pcvm.car- Ibi^ff&/ 7 unu bnoltn ^.X0.GbAy un. Aen- Jbi .^oc bedic cps unabcp2uuicf>abefbto ftiioluonif.cju^ uooar j?ub^ ^Zibi br. 1. car minw y^Cil. tuKbf ayr car. ypoc-d^Tpu- ' VZ&sS °c\cp & da .itr opf? Ofbnc pZafttwe 1 -!- film^n-m^lm. betSot.Vihi.ein'^rno.i. cafv'iiu.uiHi cu.i.cAf.^ ^ Wba-.tfi f. uM.jd.l&Fldoeps pecefrfirmly yearn vecUebac' et.c* if. . /TUotio p (e Bufba. tut.pA. .jCtfb^l'toociAbfbn 0 . Vr/cu?Aa Aannutfi milruf- oaf. jsd. fJt. boc . Xti- w-lIieSo. ixxx-.Gi 7 . Csuuar # 7 Tgnutt'Vflgp-t- ^ ^ 1 Vn 2f xenV ep^. i. itujtl m eoS Vmiik 7 tin beAim# oat iriAnw Amw. bonX. pAX .Oi. GI&. ’I’l&.c SimSca.T'.Siltu^c.pijrr- ~lXt- 7 Po(k uato. .X-foUV. WoSo'jOC^JoI^^ll’i-ffinuit^yaje.C. -cer/ Ac ep£ 0 R€ ■£. 11 • GUtifteAejA’. Tpi.C. mi. to In Anto uiu.j.X.uittl toc.borikto .u-cap. HnAimt#pa& ~7un moLm Jc-xcu.fatfu- pi fcanp (tnecenlu / 7 i. (alma JrjCCWW.WSiUo. S?l. jwnrf T’.R.X.iuli^.uu. fot lTlocb/u. (AX' Tunpf -wmuc' Se pzj# X. ~j0c^7 sMU-CjIiSv/^. plica., roller 'jevu. AeX.Vpajto 1xs.^tu. foXjcu. km 7 , jn camuana auian&.^cui. inafe jpcmbmc&.pii^bcu. (ol&^c- ic pci. Situa-opto pore*. YRX-uA 1A> to.xNX.likfimto ytaA p^AXA? ep& baiocii ay^OcAibyjA-fcrif. 4 -itoreSTKUurr 'So pego .£. • ago nepof bierbti xenAe epo QSpP . 1 H C^.^p-Cli • (Amf/Stm fe dejS'.Tpa.e .;xy.caplnAibo non {to cap. Ibi.^-uittl atoi.bto-to..Xi.to lbi fc&i-yi.moiin Ae.jci.Gl&h sjm AeA.J pifcantoe.X-y^ialma So un. ioiy^iu.ac pu.Siluak cjt/xv. porct ^ 0 -qa liuP on zm b Cf&r 0 dtmX {oUny'i u. uirg ,7ibi be m linio, 1.cap. 7 i*uittin cn.^c.hiiof.i-car. Bvtcu^k marifTen 7 elinyV(Slm JeViocm^ibiTTr.Oi-uittbf yi borf cu.t. car- /q_pcm in ca.muana.i- malura/ ae.pooc. ^enap. noc cn xi2nuto' ^ ^ ^jiflrt^'teWie epo cilOifiCsViX.^puno 111- cap. ] n Snio. e una .7 ni 1. uitti cu • u. bor^ bfre .1 .car y'iirmo. lbi. <3. (erui.T'n, aJ pn. Silua.c f. ml rc^. bel^ocfnxEXgiamilerx^a^.i. cap^ Irrc-nrcT^X. uaUb .J^.^./pojtrjd.fot. tUocb.^ it 11. lik 1 file Anfiri ^-am Ac epb- uno folm fcAcj^. -rjaX. ut- can In Anio c una.^ui. uittlcu.u.car Wiv 1 / --rejf-t. lufttAxcnuir Ifdc v Xja-... - /'aimiA'.lbi.ii. falir^. yin ciurranrcamuana. 1 • waftira bc.jcc 1 • Acri. H.t ■ uali^ .tin- lib.y'pojtr jxl. Itft. . GX. b ccSr* 6umoSV 1‘aje- f • tenure- be ijlemxer! fUmuuip 1 fle hffe-adie e?° etUtMkv&.tfmomqc k f icftk .Tju-e dnnrd’rul* 111 funtr.u- uifii jtild. >. denaf. pR.t. ual^.l-W. m ual.Jx.W. S.amolJitenuir.'t’.R.t'. T $e ^nfri^xen'dcanr’ &Jrl>£ l f 5rT>f ft £ .p utin fnlin \ e dejtf.T^ia-S.ii. affirm. In Jmo.fujU.^X. uiffi W .1. arVdinUti ^ati.711 ■ (erui.^fiCanalejni. tW.Stlua. uu.jvrALt-iald>.p-IX- 7 p$-'J*-GP. TTlnSo.- uii.ltl. n«5 & -jveLmarafcfc aAugu-flmi. 'qa Wbuirt’.R.E ydiunS aaejlanrei.S; jlflioifdioc' ^Urreluu fe Jjofle uqtere uli uuluepc^hixii annugmonad* I fle AnffWifren iet/o^fif^p un o iucp {'cdekribS- lbi . eun° box& fe&£. ^.p T-AX. ualeb. nil-Ilk / 7 pojt: in • lik/in.lTX.roliA. OikncBnun auju- Ae epo m■ 1-,u 3 r fo AefX.X.H £ .ua.U 6 .yc. {cfc.yyoffry w r uaX X-(bk. louuai*b-timurc:Sc'^*ege / .£. b 7 ) uc$o Ae' pord) xeiXdc epe b € KSTb -.px 1 u . 1 ugif S'.TYa-P.l-ca.fi In ^nia.X.cu.u.boj'o/u.1^1111’. T.ll£- 7 pc’jb. ualurr. .X-Glik. tnoAor'^cc’C. Gli^ - OfuuAroxonurr' Ao.j^d . £. H Aa "ten A# epo. uitu 1,m ^ feAejA'.'f’^.c.t.car firmaTTeAAr.^x.G.. - - fZf , t _J.eviuolt» ixmurrAir pecfc.£■ ^ Jt])crfin^W ^(Ut - ^ ui •Glrnf G 5 ernA<^ -to.S.viu. Aap- InAnGeunaT'XViiii.Lunicu.c. borA to .vi • car/Ami 7 lbi^ta- 7 V- fcrui. Silua-7 1 ^ ciunaxu .m • bage 1 -bc.xxvu ■ cbnarfVI.£ uaW^.vu-U.7pofl/ci.ltk TUoAo- y S;iu. Irk. ^Alno^ Teniltr Ao p^e.C l kc°Ten urr". be opb ^ . 1 -carVpd.m^Gl infe-Acf^. Ibi-n- boi^ peAAr ti • [oil X. AX ^poG .’ualu rP. XV- GXITI0S0. ^XV-foX- tumpb tenure f-K. €• . ^ hp;. u • cb Tenure V) |xl?juonifbe' ^>0 paioc. iu lugu jn^SrC-.T^’- 1 - 1 ^3° n, tw^. M «. b . w ,'! banc-to-iu/uilfi in ab ftrma7 peAAX.pix.GX.TtantA’ f^?ualuit7.jbi^ccia.c. 1.K ___ £ djCstti). A urjhn ic cymt&e Win (WieUrtW. t. utafi leepo.Jttf, , t. 1U311 Ifci .e;ui? uifff feAfetif Vi. fAtiXldyuaiatC _ f emp -Xit' (blid^. lurcjot Tenure" depaje-E. ' dnfcbral toi Ac epo -^s lt - H eC S^ p unofobn fedeft.pfaz.i. cxr.jbi.c m^tno y w\borz\rcd\mti cay 1 bi|cctk/i. molin dex. fcli& 7 i 1. dc pa. tit ua\£ tpcMypoffrtfc. tiC.VCidborxl. fol#. ^VnliTc Tenure"before. E.^pccurc ire-quo iwUirrarcja. ^ ^ fell N6CS . folmf fedeffifag ■ ’Jjtotfd'jfeieaD poflrpepf deAtccri bucpni fUiofufba. Tpi-e.Vi-cap In drib (unt. \\.cafysooc. uittl brar.11 1. car. ItiVIII. feruyirndin de".x. fat. Siliu. XXXporc. T K.. £. uaiefe x • U&7gAo fecfyrin .life IDoAo .1111 A&Tj-cam epf babure.Vm. life. S iredten u reb ep^e- £. JJ#'futfcr > T»i Asepo doodu.^p imo folmfedefitrifa, .Z In Wo.e una atryjcvu. utHi cu.x.boi# tnc. 11 . car. pctkfvu ferut.ybvmS pi {carAc.ccc. allralt/m canuupa a uttaxe .0. Kagpr Ae.vn. fotyx. bon * tft.f- uald>.x life £ pErnifrr a?)^ma'jx-life3cbofut _trucf pecep •' y 1 ■ life .7 m iimiltc. S ipsdTenureSepttjefe. icapfe-ten d«Tepo R^Mfio^+ig-.^unofolin (cr dejli'.T'|U.e jbui. uittl brie • h ^rypeddc. Oi. fot. t fit 7 ^bfe ^ u,et xenuir' 5 efeqr.E. ■ lK&ak8F8G£ r ~]\ delcl^ tenure Ac epbbttfy -Jj> uno Glui (edejlfe.Tja.e.u.cap. In Wo. c urucaf-7 mi. bonT.7 n • iejiuyuna ac pn.7 filua <711 • pore’ betffe foltno WttacUf ^ecurbeipmc:t.IU5U ydimtX.floS£. jin HiSSoId^S. lbi iacec ^m^li"^^>lln ; 'r]a.t. it. caf ]vdvw.eunacarym. .uitti Inrr dimtft aap tl.£. ualSjccc .Gt/pofE.-pcx;. folid 1 . ITlcclo.pci. (it. Iptfa-S"de- fktb^ ejn baocy' penun|rtfc-rtf biutficme {^.Gcdpic-rniunr Vp^*£-cu IS.nffnJ?Ten de epo dirm#(olmfedej^. t—v ---j-irr ^.• •* -T]a. iT.i.(iir.]lji.tmdnio 7 pciii.Luth hnrdtim^^t^^ t l£ 51 ’. Jh 4 >VN 0 ' lbi.i. fert?7». molim u una maria, ap^yvmJAcpn ' paiffbfW Ac epo palcsf&ei .y> .tu. uyi'iedeftt. yc.dA ftlite - mtnucp. I ft: n.'U'l) vljijik . nV-> C " . car■ J t» ^nio. e unaTyc. \>oX& bncAimcaf. 1 li^cda jOX.{X.mc/cSo\ii:. Gadr*c«feg^^^^¥; ,. . V° 7 V'fdfflr&zjtU'&ot *S ^l_da"W dc epo EaHNf. Pdit b tllypofl/ualutirxl. ^o(\ Hlo^o.jx.rdi 5 . EtuuiTtnuucVj-cgc f. fcr^cp.tja.e.t carydinV. Indmofu^ifcar.j-iit.uttti' _ -/in.ferut.7^yXni.ac pn .f ' Tbie 'ofttfxen Aeepo Xii.^dp.qvyu£jpaynu.vnXAti. Ill po fl; pX.iol. rriodo/nu lib. _D u^n 5 ^ 01 x 19 -cen^e epo p£S+H&e&7pi bt. p^r : 7 ;ttt.u ( t-pofCT ... pofl;XC.iol. lTlodcj/iiii.li^. . I9 it^o'Se' mcnrjtnnr -ten 1 ndecjd^ tut pX-Icltd*’ apl^tun dc epo btR-cboftU .^p. dim'iolm {tdeld. T'|a.e , .i. cap. Iti .e.tn Arno.Jin. uitfi yin- ferui. 7 “n molm ^exl-ien^X-ac pxxl/nxt alnetu. tlfypcfl.ualuir.poc. [dC. tTloio.xl.toliS'. ^/q*elin xenure de ]*^e- 1 fde ^adzrcPxendee^c Cu&i&ry) imoQAmfcdiffl. -f\ad.u-cay. \ndmozuna.yyc. uitft cu.O-bor^ bmr.l- caf7dim#. \b\ -Xun. ac ya .Stlua. V. poyc. tft.E. ual^.jx- QoXy po[t /l . G>t . lUo^c.d 111. U^fer urnu unf miltaf. I eurctr de yodnmy€'izini& Acyeycb. & adulpde" airbdpine-cen ^de epo &frtwi 4 TtS'l’W-. ^uno folm Qz dejid.tia.e.Vi cay. Indrnc {umr.'fi. yXu. uilK cu.i.bi^^trc.ni.car'.lbi.xxjc.tu.aopa. yftlua. J&. voyc!- Nc ifto oS ted Y) u^d dz moroftnr' mt jilud/’pajiura^d'ual^ T^R E. Oi.lil^pcjt ^7.Tmzf. Jul|‘id-roiurtr d^pc^-E. ) u^t» ^e / po^tbxen > be epo p€ 6 +H&t&y r pi bt.^p.it.folmf (edejd'.Tfa-e ]n 5nio.ii.ca.r7^imid’p/oi.uitticu.xiiii. bord bnr.i.caf. T.R..E. uaicb .c. feky-pofcdntchil. rnrGi.l#. 1 cf] £ fem7leuuin^ 7 Cluret7S 1 red 7^1'!-11. •tenuep.T’R. £, ypote)Hitc ire ^libcTcu ttiT fuis. pi baiocfif Ten in Wo R lls^lYo H g ft in 1.{blmT te dc^t. Tia ^ -X ^• car-J n ^nTo funr .V^X'l ^ 11 ' IU ^ 1 cu { XC<7H- bom bmr-Xitn.car Ibi ^cd^T'x.faittp.V.C.denap. y ft-ac pd.bittu. I. porcy 7 ptfeat VV- dett tHualet.X- 1 #7poji•*'x%.lib.Hio. I. I #yzainycAArt dc^rma-l^x:. bl 4 tno^ lenutr: J n bocdS mifit epf. iff. . denaf. pxy reman fey yccAiutfione comrnfdeovt). jP^ottr 7 de RomenetTer/be epo - jfi 1 aHtpoiTf' - l )s^t 46 - b+tf-^uno folm fedeflt.u 1. cay.]nAmoZ una. yyc. uittl cu. m.bor£\rm.ut.cayydmidi. Ibui iepu. t R.f • oal <&. c.lbt.7 y°ft y t ■ fdtf • m .mi. life ~lide R^tfecSawi be epo intf)ape(c diV|oliri.'7p-canro fe AjAyAi. -J-bya.e.u. caf. jbi-xi-uitti cu’.u.'bopj'.^nt'.in ca^ptfearta ffo fer.I • our^eT;ni e Biomfsel^beeif Pd^. n. (cl#. , Irc T^C omei leymuy fc oetx p (^pumo maps 5{uBcubmepc 7 -cfil^. laqtian. pace'mfraoa^fbi-fld' - ( 40 ) ( 41 J 11. Ilf .7(4 ojW^-Ct.IIWL-ctAlfitom?' IflC lUfef-on^fc'^ dtrmf rin ti dcjtt.'A ^L.^-li’d^lv dniO'&dimtitoa^wX^-wHi cu.ii.ooiB f w^uf^a-e. Jn&i0ini>cnf how - Ivodreter/def epo B£NlN&£^£-d?dimtf IblinfedejiL ^ ~lty.Z.\\, car. In dnio.etmacuj^iii.uitii cu-jt.tor^htTC'.ii.ca^*'. IbifiluaV pW/un* / P^-T’R.£- 7 pofr. U^turc.pcl.lof. fcud’.O Tier -cenun; deftgg. £- 1)1 iillo^tbjpftte ~J^oSdtpxeJdt epo dtmif lu^^p-ranrele'SeJ^ llWb- /jbi mu. mbua manee redded #ciV dW/lolnnu .OaiWia *jbi un a uifcua manetr•pcddep' pocit. denap^plnnu isdiOjuX lure'lee#. foltir. Buofodn wiucp d-KX. fmeaultlV&mf. 7 fJe ^o&vTZxt&K epo duniW dena ^f^rfirenVoNe. actren huqpp# morrcjyiv-/' i bi btr -qa a5 dim ifostp ^un utttm cu- in. Wa-^dimidaf.7u. jnfcar^de.V.fol& b totu 7uature. {bldr'.' -y in lestfa £gft«- jn CsfRCiWif firma de-rae Riuagron fr. Be jeuSo.eon- rfa.e In Wo funcfvczr 7llU. Uitti cuMi.bora hnt M. arydirni^-jbt an rnolm^e.pci. (olid'. tR.f• ual^.Cm-Ujcdo j^-XfXltto^o.^ntt^m |Qkre.#ui.li^- £^uua|tFTenure depart- jLda tendefbudoepf mkwvVt^dmiuf tuauAtculp tet/ie abaXaliud dtrmf wzju 3 ecLunol£ Ten bepfe^de bugp-ne nepoto beffu. ilocutrun^ uat-^C.Ibf. ^ ugo-cep f^Ctlg 3 e epo.^.mvfclmf/H&CVSBCRO feJejS’.-rj^.e Indmo.&i-cdf.-zyo. uitti cu^uWcb {Tnr’-u.ca.f'jtT.ii.tnolmi &&.yc l.Vl. ftdid77iiu.ao pw-Sdua un.^ofo^Y. R,£. ualett pen-life 77 p° fee.Cot?. ITlt^o^c lib- 7 tarn pudd #u. lify#u. job#- t b^cb^Alb^T^uTvi&y-^e.i. /bzifto cv-cen bu^o^e moTTcfbjre#vn. Ucfrf^^unaWiu. T^tmif. qd appciWvn. Glut. Ifttebucp xeif de ej/o 4 &CG cli ii.jobnffedefd.T^e In Wo- e. i. Ccqjvycu 11. uitti brre 11 .cap. TR.£. ualef. yin.tif-Scdoyi^/vid^^ Beboctt) ten butredemoncfojre.M.molir/.de;XXVUi.ltdif. 7 Vnofolm {edefd'.-r’pie uitti cu unobafd -j £j-incaf-cenur^' 3 e^i 5 . 6 . I fde v§t SolVoM 4 - .de ep£-^f u d j-ndmo.eunacar-Vm peddre.un. IcliW Cu.dW. ' R,.£. uat^ v '^c.bf.y'pottre7 mdSor^tf*- &t& )n bocc?) manfre GodrieVra/.j&c. aci dealodio iuo. ~lde bugpten m '&W fc KS uffmoliXcjutpddtt^l^iii. ^/ferlm5elf^e {ninreo/n jpaif ulli imnepio. - zen at |^ui>o£pi m leuef e^e d.xm^ui^uy'ihi * \rc ■ t ■ uittm^ i. Wd. ^s/at.O. {olitf. I euurT?TBnuic§fc]^e-£ 1 ftie- man{rt 5 c{da titrez?»-U'ibxu.yuu. ac m-d’-n- (olmffedej^- T. Hf.uaieS.sjni.U?.V-pojt/^c-fotit. modo.'^i-lif- il)olleue -tenure de'^YeW^- ^|fde R-iiduipwi^ m. folinfibtteffl.'iW. e" In dmo.e una caf.7o. uitti oa.mifoju fnr.ii.caf.tbrfilua. MoVc^- De hocoS -cen^aa rmlef.i . folm de Radul{i.7ibiIre-i- car feu. iii-boya- Xtcu a).'fR..E' ualdi.#n. -7-ram cjd J^^adulplre. j-eticlttr.iui.lif. / bu^o^emOTielrTire cap manerii. 7 ibiV- molm^irnid’de. Vi.lif. Qe R aduip -cfen U epo $v\lb j frfotj g-.^otteuexenun>^ g ^g.£. ^ u.fotwf kdefiAp* In dmo-i.caf^u-fWdi dimil^ a/- Be bac -qa-W Ro^efarUT 1 • iottn ^lUW.m.uit&f cu dimrf cai^Tqda biwo ten. t. lolm y 7 treibi • 1 -cap mdn u. 7 unford. hR..£. uaLcu.oC-tdj.^Cbo rcorp-Twc.fol^- ITlobo/^l.ldl^Tram un.l&. ColoernaiureJe^.E. fie EUdulp-ten de epo ApUVowt-^ uno fotm fede^i ■Tja- v j ribnxo lunc-u.caf • cu.Vi -boid. Y.R-£ • ualef. c • {oty 7 po|t.‘^c. Qt’-ttlodo.'lxl. CUC Afcoi*edtenure de p^e-£. ^ Jl nrffiPxerl de Tjuajmer btlocbcj-fcl^ e dejeudoupt • M'oVUnfed^.^a.e jndmo.e.i.a^ 7 n.fcrui. ui^.pC.^pojtdWnio^.^l JCto bef^pecepr fn. lutra niododn. iuua- vlnoS xenuredepe^e.£. Tt u ^ tmel jy&T er ten ad firma de pi^e SW-jn leue: feme • 1. uigirz. it rncmcjpjT ten deep?.1. fi>lm uac ue-vtyspar uifione luayafctaaircr N f C f rnfo Nf- do cpfe mtja [ua'biuifione./ ibiXyCA. borct* Sfat ‘-J ualuir (S? itnufxen dimt^ uicyx jH rSTtlCl^nWD. o^xacaxc in^ldade'5»oc 1o ActteiUi) un o foltn (e def^. jnSnio.e. i- cap caanoumVz li.bojdyu.ierutfi "tR.£. uAde X ■fat-7^cfb-‘'pCC- Cot- filoito-tx.&'t'- Trefrayu •cenuepdepnpfc. Jfde of£n-ten deeffo Ctllc - bC - H frJ? uno folirylino incjp ys c. acnfle defd’.'tpa.e J n Anw weM. in. QcLpc- uttti bnv ibi.u.cafydimd’. "T*R. £ • tiAdZ.Jpc ■ f(X.~/f>afCs yoc •lot'- tUodo ?yC. Goduin° Tenurc'&eipe^e. f ■ yalti ■ O. -return. Offrn 7 rmfitTfufay- in un ao. TOl Me: epo O) l ftt - W . ^7- m ■ (0^1^7X11. Acf feiefet-~lf3. er.iu. cap. Jn dnio.e - anA capy 1 ™/ V . UI $ cuot-^rd' W'.i* car lit tcXk.ypc. dcm-Snuki.y. ^potM~T.RX udlefc -jpC - Coty pojt/txt. jot. Hlotarlrlot’. ^ (bodn^T^nunr de € • ) N S ^(T)£R & £ H£ n^Hb-*- ~j^ od?tP Lmn "ten S?i• cLcCtf&-^ 7 'ill bedim cat'- banc (olin -eja-tenure'un 7 fi>d?Sy/ be^nouo dono cp/ lit in -manu t^if be Rxcat&o film Gifieta. pc. utHofcu - iti. cajyTdud . t. popc ^7 in ^ c Ytdirc Rodn?de jrmu. <01 . ld> . ^ Jurpn ?'ren de: epc? ‘ TtehcfCS - tC .^punofolirTTlim fedejd'.Tf^.r jnimo.tA.ca/. cu.iuuool&y -yparua filuuU .Tllf. ualc£. mi. li& 7 f»ft .xl-fidl IH&o/ . C-fof. f dftc iedtba- Tenureder fajeM . ~TfdeVurjkrF ren de. ppo. i • ujem in ^ANtSBERG& _^ 7 ibi funr. u. tjopef. loci')i-tenu nX> c-me- 1• I fde7uWfir?Ten’ de epo. i • uiau m rc£ 77 \ibi {uffnu.tjo^. 7 ^ ft. iu^a."^R.t. iiaiel? yc. fotTvojb/y. fiti myc-bde. o H -ten^de epo. 1 . uu$u/acf. in a)As5€DCH06. yiti Iuttc- it. uiSi cu dim^ cap. Goduui 7 Tenurtrde|^pef • "1 fde dfaPredditi epo. pco. Acf m fsmClc?H -g 7^ 1 ' maner un 9 pt?f. 1 ioc irtfuncj; 'f. R.f • uahifc pooc.Gt'. vpoji-poc. fct.moSo -^COC. fid:. Sn*edxenurcdef^e.£. li^CsrKci —tVadulpccutbdpine -cen deepe -n.folmfm T^i-e InWm.t.carydim^TCini. uiffi etij i. cafy dirrf. fte fiaetju tit ^o&r 7 folm .7una of ibiVtR.£- ual^.ou.li^c.fi^Zpoft.l.for ^luuar^ -renurr de p^e- fi. O iW^fill 7 letapb ten deepo.i. iumi in £c€.7i1n luiT 1 111 . uitfi .T.R.Crtiale^.^n. fit’y'pojd.*^.fidf.ITloSo.^cci.lci’. Bepotr’-renurr de paje- £/ ^ 1>e curbefptne'Ten^de^ epo ts S C^U f.^p. in So Unffr deS'.*rpA.e 1 nSriio Itmttu.caiy un° u lltf ca •‘J n. VoY^ tnt; dun cap. Iti un° fepu^Vatl^i-li^- TU oil cue -tenutt/de-p^e'. £. % OKtf Ten de epo unu cr> tpf'renuej*'. iiylrRi I'locf i-£. r> uno lolm Ied.ejdytWe t > ..e unicar 7 ’i«?iU'H:f cu unotoi^ itt dim cap. x..ypojV.y xnodo^ uaX • till- 1 x 1 ? • b(dP'be coluberfyer/Ae epo Sclll4Gt6yJ> uno ^ -rdmtf {ci&iAv-i InJrno.rurucar ■ 71111 .wttti cn.ut- 00 ?^tom 7 dintid^eap.^i-cAp7dinT. / 7lB..t. uaLl? • 1 m .life.^pojt/^cl. foV. Olodo/c-ieft. Vlumc TOiutt" Ae fa? 5 ' £■ TR.dulp te curter^tne ten' ^Am® foltti feiejS- 4 ia.e 1 " Arfo.iunym i. uifficu 11 ■ hnr:.I. CJ.y. Jbt tectcl.^Mil • n'.llUlli in OSIi.M.tl'Ml. ^eljettc^Vi-iiir uvimmm'tK.i- pec. fbt. mc-lleu,! xcnuit'Se ft-bx tv. Tfiie’B.^SMlp 7 -D2n # iIeiep.i. itk^u m Qrccheftelc^Ji' > ni^llcue -mmur fii’' txye. E.v ibi ■ b un'uiHT palAxwcJen 3\, aAtP'SeaiAe^me-xen'^d. acf-^ 5 Jll OX 7 bs)tlU:>H'£i. ^aaftenurcn}i.!leue^c yaje. t :m utt^iuHV ipi .(Aid-J-tanv ualgib. ^ “K. annaipae- ujUkkIoh WiwiiaTfligS m bafflCgE t ft f, qjl?Wnu^.ll.l n E^Way^icn; S Hanrmip^eps J ^a.fiM It, ejr un uiflTreJJenr33». ]mHv’i< 101 'I 10 1 ^. ■flfnrclimUe-K^^I ®^ 0 ¥ AeKS.tjifTCnuer J^uofr'f.yqfipVl’Mtr; Uuli irj^.^uno rt>ja>“n« folm felejS’- Tia-fe n. lap ln3mo-e unacyAm yV- uiti cu.cAorA hire- 1 - cuf. SiW . jc.fcr&fa&. W. R.f. ualA .TCt. U.7»<&.•'&». fit. ?n ™« o J ' i -, l ft ^ ... IA nL-cm c 5^ fib 9 Anfc’mnl ie jlf &KUEOM faiic epi k^TW^Ul-. <^Tsnu«rVln»l keyset, ydd <}e(S’uno(oUn/rnyj-ni-lujir. c|abiiy> ^de monr|rntrTen f alia parte mr diuiftone Id am. ~Xta,.e. in. cap. ludrno (dnc.'fi.^ti.uiHi cu .vi.(?or« l»mr.i. flip, bn* ttit.ferui t. poro- T:r,.£. uale^.Jc. yoeSX- fi»l«a. u £|lWicdE beU^uUE^ Jt-jm S C l lUaRT'im - loco tjelli) m ^auocar Wi. fedejd^.VH. folmfi T^.C.lii.capl ^ In drno.yc-ca.rCumr.y c ^cutt. uitti ca-^u.bordUrrc ^eyu. car.lln^cda.7 Qu-fepn.^tiu. mdtm be ycm. foliVy' e^C. m Of/. BloSo/c. lib AS numepu 75i abb taMfa faiaj^^O^lib plufappciarer- %_AbAfyi>e curbefpi na unaXena.7un iu^u de-qajodioy. ini? cnaneru. paid cfuetud.Vi > len .‘7i. 1 .fen 27 l^ molim'Se.'to. {oUS7 iejSp anofolm.-pjap n. a/, jn dnw.z una.TjV. uitfi ca un oWOn®. i • .^7{me cfuecuilme'y7un iU 3 a ucecw ^ w ittSf ^fpn'^mn jx*,V3»f«fmmrmcaroa Tiaciun/ bmcai paneW Jn Woo Juntr.u. 1tMi rtii« 3 /4t*r / Vrtulti. II. j pa. 1.ti.tPuaicfb.tin.lit. 7 pepr/pcl. l^eofliTenuTC £l>fi. &£-&£. cf -^l Vin* folmf.it-cap \n Imo funtr.n. 7’cl. UtU*! cu.l. \soyH Vrnt.\?c\i\.ctf. tbi pc&xju ti^tp plsabb ten' ijl^puno jblin Is . oap jn Imo.e una//^\:. uiHi cu.l-cap. lbi.fi. ac' pa. 7 .V.pep/^e / paln^filW]^El.£. ualtt.j^.f^. Sclo pc^Wl• ibT.TPe^t?/uu.Ltb• Jt 4 ^l li gtfg . 1)CU^ An Rornujer. -Islcj^pliJn {oltn.jk una cap m'Sme. ualurT{^.X^. let. .|n ff ^7 no. ~lpleabb ter/uv iuau' r K.apgM 7 i 7 K£. 7 /lnfei^1>ggo. Tt^cuiio iu^d febeja.-f^e.ii.cap^/imc.B una-cu-nn. (at^- Ibi -^ci. a 7 pn 7 e|pa parf moUm le^.da/7 Tlua •TC.pW.yabliuclTr.ii. tu^a ^ icfue Inic leiroa abb. 7 ill. 11. utttbf cu .On 1. loY&i&£yfDft^Uirc / .m lit. /rh elo.mi.lt. QitSlX nfaX-mt agAt6e Cl i l kl H j ^l)dlJl < fTalC t mu- ' a r n Aim& film fe Aefi.-tg e.t- ar. InSiTw ftm- uiHi V>rrt.1 • &e$yc lumJTffl-f .7fop- u^lun>^-pt- fhcwr fox Jn ta lt to w lu LM fi clccY h'HM - -flpfe afcft W Hoft&o fe H CV I> .w- fcUnf _ —■ ■t'-p.e: .1 mi. cap jn diitojunv.tn-^ y&J*- u "iicu xlM-1>0r& brnr-pti* W 01.!({?. ^V) e -qa uilU^WS-rnf OfteUiS.i-fitnj 7 *ip .«.«r?ctf.*.W. , „ Y VZ.m» /le ea^tira uilUnW-xoi Girt^qi • MmrtirmSluou ' nnrl’.7iti'br.l- <$ 5 ,m. Winf. i ^. 4 Zfm’?< 3 e'#' UillanmL.7tbi ttr.i. ax77<\\ i. uiftbf ax- !• ftruof • jK e “ nu ^“ iq*umufo^rrabbi■ nifi .xcc.tiC quof m Anno. ^ ^ In? tct/ " 5 ® eaK-tJa ulIUti^. i. (&vn. 7 iftn Itx-i .can cu.m. VaKin.t& 7 %!Af^ &&-QP'udldncf' oaf .VtU- 1 otft. Vi f£r? jU? l ttaf& -ret/ Jnm# fi Im/jCi- dftjm .b&x$& • U t tlano^ • cj£ uat. fit. Jfferaffl.M>\ -pOJ. few- ^annuIpier cctu^qi’-ren un ui^u. Vat .1 . den- ^XannulP iialkabon-nm tin tuou* 7 ftt&' irfSe.X. dert^. {up Ju ^ 7 Oidelapf w 3 cwb #.un fclwTaoc^' i Ac^rgfa- 7 it* ttf.11* ap eu. l 7 clorJ’-Vat-vi -ti& Tpftf at£ -pJ flVJNMHftg J^Juok 0 filinfjdim^ ~"Te iej^-T'i^- e .s’. cap. )nW(P -q& quaT^nem/' mX$ lif tndmo tbi. 1 . cap*-7u. uittofcu.ii. ▼ M?ord 'hr rai&ni-car. Vit^ualurc'.^c-ld?* llullu fefurnu w^e peclttitr mji -j^oc. fclitf _p armu atS’i . pfe abb -cen S iPTtlYCy^ali 1 ]i 4 Bc^PCRG h‘JH 6-- ^ ^ daobs iolmf fe de^£.~jfa.£-nii.c&. indmo-cuna/^iin. -yya.vxfo cu.^i.borJ.^irc'.ii.caf^Jim 7 / TU-uM. tlf. uA&.d -(&-7 ■ UXlaio h ietetm- te 74 ..E iftmc.K.cxt-M V-tini-T-E.-E-luteC•je-fttii'. m^odjDC.fota J •X- Uno < Su r rf Imt 1 . |h Vnt'morc ln-ijb- fiaufn!?TCT unofl-mfedaP' n-ca^ T 1 G 1 (urn: diMit.waSitiw.^-to)|*C' Y-fl-t-udd ?-11 jTlido'liii.liS. TpfeaK-t^mXwfeM 1 ZV.JimlWiB.uis- ir.aOTfTuniUffil.-f'ia.e.yi.af- lj> (um^.uittfcu. „„. 1, Uf.w caf jti .^. r* 1 7' llua ’ 1 '-W* ■ tu H^o.^m.U. in-lcaf be Wi'Wisfe )n lAiiorBaic-f - w wr “ipft dbi! Tjn QjWC-fc H fr -r.R.t -fir&#>.»«• fotms. -yiaamrm Bnmbcmciirs - . T^a-^-^ «i‘ 1 t.i iinmx«c. ' /uitti W.^.af.')Uec4i. 0 ^«n«pr.R.t. Cu W. mi . 6 tmC ^ auguffe?•■■ 113 S q-™ fan, rgio^iti Tar« filu| im-SETa-uucke pafi^io a.p^a.W-lim.K-narruudd. t«; Ut.R.f.uatf.^l£fe.7p>P: vm.UKmaor pen.U7^-rar- V^& ks; ic |f ^. Mtoi ■« ■ W 7 *- ' u 5* fcik|Si.-fTai.pcii. exf- In Am fttirr.im.jaa.iin.uit 6 m ,V. boa 1 bra-. X- . jHGurtwig^ Hir GauS-oai ienge lc7l'Gh..V7-' e 'p^t'. . xen 11 : ' 7,1 ‘ : ■ idmrbe . 4 ^- . e, xi 1 1 1 ■ jn-Snw fum-H. a/ 7 t.uitti b*xfn. £ 5 ' fWffcte- cjirenu w ffe H V dene de fey ?• €•/^uno GlmJeAejtt -fju tu^afurnp ^ infia toutftmtf bu^f-Tftu ngu. zyct^^edzfo&o epi Baioc. Jit- ca/tnr TPcit. JnWoiurrc/t.caf^/^.uifi'tcu.^.Wf^’ fjnt.i.rafpAtrrf'- *f &.f • tule£ J^C. fly 7 pojtr'ixxtt'. (ob.Vdoto^ipoc. {olfi. WtH^e-.A^- 4 w< p«r-anu rc a^£- ’S8-£'7f’°P : y rrn,: *°- ua£.aoc.ftjUd'. ]h LEJ 1 - i ) C 'WlW.lg.W 6 |nUnBCPaiflt Un£ awioWjf \>u^ Sme&**- 6 fdItaV«nuitfi 5 T a f s.E'- / Lr£.]lt cedi 7 He qua cal un ware tanmiici* W«m l W ^w«'Setn«Hfiv. ^ vj^w^tajwiw m iWio .tR.C JM fe ± uno iiupjfa U l- caf mWh# cu.i.«r*7^ m olmae.^.«. 7 WvaakTtxl^. , ”1 pfe 4 ? 1^0 W - t SPg R V &e . in ante. Ju^Cll&E J- A-lfi tenure de GoAuiTio.'T^uno folm feAe^. . Vi - cap- |n dn\o (unc.iii.caf.7u. uitti ca-ccoc^dtorK Vnc'.mi.c*f-1tx.Vnj. fating ai-rcu parte- noiie felinp Ae.poe. lol^- pifcana^i'i- Aetf. Silua^e-i». fofc lVi • u. py$jp • T^H.fc .- 7 ^o^. y ud{urt.X-ld). TTloAo^C-tlK TL^-naml-cen^ de bug dimi£ iuy ydimiti lura^.^xamxt^de^C. A^eleln? tenure' dv^eopXJiykjidh- 1- cap.T*.R.£ Uq) ej-ucuften Ae Vuicpne BlaebctntWESTbNS - .fela.ot'eman tenu rc'T^tf.E.p^airniSio iotin feAejS’. -f’-pi.t. u . cap! In Amo funr'iti ,7un uiHi cu^y.Wni’«*.i.cap. Jhi ecc& -Tun fepxuf. _ 7 _4.L£.uaUV.iiii.l^y^ 0 |lr.* / iu , li^. IDcJto.yi. \&. JitfrbiMp z&fmlflafefc'fa&otiiend'unfohn dimib* un^tnin^Tanto feAefi£ 7|a.e. m. tap Jbi.jcuu.fccVi Viffr.m.tap. Ttl.£. tialeo-nn. 1 ^/ egenter/ Ae ^uqone"un ui^u min^ejc^ve^oTnen^, ^ unc iu^o le Ae^S’. hue jccl^i -cenuep, T^n-C. u < 3 py(ti .Z ox. in. horkX. H.£. uat^ -pcoc. $.J pojtTw-io^JH t&o*' ‘~P\_et^a > -W de bwpne? in a^rnatel'ai hoxSe. Oi. nc .Cn . cap. it. F&.jg.tou'-y™- r^ 11 / 4 ®^-^- 7* Vm-dc t». Silui.^d. W*. 7 m- tn^o.-v*'. us. Iris bum-ten dtmiS >u^ q#Tentar.«.f«d)i 7 in W.i■ .ST cS. un. t^.V^uiW / ; /frnif.V.BliK .i .—, ■ , .- . ~7 Vni- utth cu.,xt WY (rmr- tut- caf^ jbi. it- /un -molin' de.jscc. Amy poccm- B& thi.jtf /be- V?i. yore- / *YR.E- uAefe . Cn j. life.ypofir /;• fol$. tTlota-Vn.lif?. jp\ tnck ~cerf be In ugtme n ofCToN C. ]k SiqT 'fH^S^; leuuiT?renuwAe-ye^'i-y^Amd>ioio[m Aefx- Tp- e. in - cap. jn Ymo fumr.'u. tuw cu.C’i. t ■ pc. tit’s W de buotrne. m. tuga/dimi#itmja m Cfll t lCgfrife Hfr. In aiic xfu’mj cf gto • (oclw. Y|a e. 111. caj^ Tbi m- 11 . CS^vcibnio^pcV .mill aia^-koiYtnir.in. capydim. Itn.Y. ccdfe.y^- jx*. Situa. Gi.-porc- X adulP fit? RacarSi Tetf’^clnujzme' limits’ Qm 171 Rochiri^cl' qY Imfccrenurc-Aeif^sS.^bmi^ {ohnkbeffi.~(pi.e.U.ca-1(t m.^cn. uitK 1-mcuna carp'duntf. fcefilua.‘'i.poifcl TR.E. uale£>. I. tcY^peJfc.'^W.GY. alp-ten Jm Sibil H GfS *& • ftuo {ecfcl-t^uepdcfl^.tw'/^uno luqr^imfedejY. T^a ;.In briio.e ana.cu-iin.uittiC^un molin be-pCX. Aeri-JJC. cLC Y & I . lUlefc • ^ci - &t'.“ r po(tr.'aOC. fot. ID obo/jxX. {o\ 8 . uejo^e manneuile'xen-cte'liu^ jt 4- £^Relffisl&. -&£^fta 4 4 & £T- l \/ln^ Tenure'ke' pap. £.^.n. foltnftY dejY. *Ija.& vni. catkin driio {une.-fi.7Xt. uiHi cu JXV- bjyA'hvt-.c. of. Itn pcdUy'^n. {^i.Txw.ac fbi.T.R.f.uald? xf^^oMiu.r^m^/orn. di#: ^_nffhY’ ~ceni>e U luj^.t- uuju qYwnurr ine^liuri^ un joci^S dviffi-t.y^urioiu^ieAeft-^.m.cctif. \bi-e CU uno u\%7\ 1 • box&ry un rrwlin 'be-jCCvi.Aevt 7 Cm- ac^.T.R.t.jm uaf.^l- C>f. JX^r^r ^coc -ren tiu^one'. 1 - iu^ii c^renurcun jodfeff ^ 7 ^ 7 Tamo Aeft. jbi.e «na G&cutmoboi&.^iui.ac yci-X&£.yfr\ uxt.tfcc.foltf. ^ illf^r 3 rcnAe In ugone un iiuju j-Mlt iMGEBRlOf ^•cenun: qda steyegv.f. vat^uaiunr.iui.(Vlf. -fill lbi jnit nec.e. is U'.kw les--.'. ; .. - . - Wnfc buiro c>e rwyTrcfetc ten vl’^ctt C •TDallirue'ttnurC’ -O.ui.ioTinffe Atf£- _, ~Aa-e.1. car-~ 7 ibi.ex n bpto-J$Cyc.beya tint/. 1 • <-*a^ U > 1 ^ eccU.Jim.rnoli m 7 be™ ill) . lt^. 7 ^ 1 ' R/1' 11 - ^cn .^i 111. a -T. R.£- ud&yciAi&'f '- ti^ ■ IDoio .*' Vm • • Tjple tiU50 -van WVCWbWC ? Befi^tentirr n ~r. 1 ni> - -.? -qaalnif.e evr^iuifiijne. 1 U- * 1-1 |— M«-.C. J ©e Fr 0 ^el^e'^.ten , lnei^^riuonif^xyiuifioneliu^zn^. ■tEii 1 ^ 1 ® V) U^d .jnm -aSf.jnjna |ua iuuifitnie.y'uat. 11. lerui cu. 111 •cat'. I . "Totu Y. Fi - £ • uMb.ja i.iS.y pop/i 11 -1&- in .* m i- l&- cjct lie liufjo tnc dunfionC' iua. ~lnr Aiuiftore tianc ejt ut? (odiS -cmejii. . acf ^ute -tenure ic •€. Jfmic^l')unS’~ccn ti" Viu^p una ^ar» Jacma. que nictnl riecyeAJui. necaiullu n) laomr. fal. e mt Auufijne lua-Tpit' < 3 e ^tfer , 2>clnuymc'ufi Tnolm.- 7 rec{i'. 4 Wiui.Gt'. Yf^crfh ^ 0 "cwt Je bugeme? ^tfW^V’liitiirtTemirr'de ^-^e. £. y^punotclm le-dejS’. T^a.^.n. cujr |btjum.m.utHi7^-'eMit>(a. • / l!R.£. uat^.jxi. {tft .j poft ..- JC\ 7 . Ill ryox . fof. ~ | | 4 ‘^ ■ isSlilltf icCT'. I tl &fRI S j^’-t’ ilsl h lbV Jpfe buop-om CjoAyic be>Wipxdfzenun-AeyapS . 7 ^> .vi 1. folinf -ec "m^/. Qmp/dini^.^dim u^t>. /cjgi alia ^atf.e tjerdiuifone [70^’. 7 ta 4 «jn\qirf ^aiorenfis. Tja-e.^a?. caf. jn dnic lune. , uy 7 ^c>oci. uitft' cu-pc. Infre.^C. ^c^Jvm.iq'uiTii. ■rndiint'Sc.Vn. Q,i^t. y$ C. do -pa. Silua be.'xcd. +xrp£ Y Fl■ £/uatt^.pcc.Ii^ yjxjir/ <7ut.ld?-]Tlo&or'pC?• lot. lAoXWi i i.t&. BpaX^ ~mn bim% (otin una uttfja-mtrP ^ b?V fo^ncnut^^e-j^e- E.~^-Tantojer^c^. -^,e'.0. < a.|‘. in<3nio fuTTr. tiy 7 ,£WC1. \xr$ brnr.ni.cap. Ibt tmftfuuf. -'~ 1 - -/zxcsd- tYloAoSua. iifc/txy. Gst. t-unae T^ebrtgtr -ten Ai lU - lH6CS. 7At1>fec •xmuTCbt -p^e.£y7-j^7ni XtspX fe^.ii ■ foltnH ^a-ejcci. C3^- JnSnio-e unzpriim&uy'XVi -uittt cu #ii.WX bnr. lf>t. n .tpcdjp.yjM. felly'll■-mdimde-jocv. foliX.Tnif. pifcarip it rntUe ^{cyaruxpnt Im^uttfcV^c irW fan- V.aT priz/Stlua. c-X. pore 7 . TK.f.y-poft^uat utr. ^XXX 1 . IX>. THoXo/^oC.ttX* eocji'rpL tufbna.e apaxima. jH-^Vg& gSfaH l^W I fXe W &CRn)cltKOC « Alrertenurciep^eX. ^ urw Glm ^.e. hi i. . iTloSc^zer/ cjXa borno Xe'X) Xracef.tm.fbltX'. Salute lep^yi - .-.. 7 W4/ . ^|^pie bti^p -rerun Wo un iiumy'Xmi&’ jHl^6£b&l6H- m"t £ ‘ ^€&iT , g . Go^Tenure 3e-piger.fc’. Jk-etn uifuitff at.I- caf.Jih. <4111. zc pa. A.A.X ^tuiSo . 20C. ldtV7po(l/3C. jdX • ItloSo.*^^. foTA |r» ec^ XuriS’ e(X una mT^a-^r m Sut^rbfif. tpuaze^ - nutc'ini jbi mefbtnfbotik’.pciriemf raM^.uRA.uatt^ ^.^enj7j^-"Avni. tnobo.’Xn. ibl^- E^W. iGaEUL^cno^ts Weco^oms.. *--|J- n UsV k ^<&uftWy. ) n \>4 X] j. at coo uicecom W b&pxip'im IB ^ T*.R.E. |cn• EoJmfydimft 7^Vf uno joltn/'m. iu^if* ‘r’jz.e. 4m. C&X- j nWio . V-bou apantKf. - 7 ^: 1 . utUi ca.iTCC.Xtn^ bnc.X.caf. Ibiecd&yvnXerui. "yxm molin . Policy 7 J?C-aTT^uilX. lbi.XC.de Tfilua.pooc.jW ^ Jfu&exl )t ljio a) -aatbu^p^c -momfyir^. uu 1 uau/cL TySjJt.lpC■ fet■ ' hl^T)lMO ~Tbt \rc \> Mmo.tycui- d^t^.oyj^ barf in xWttf a^i ptwt Tcnurc^Seiunt'.^i.bo^' -j 4 eXXaT j.'&enajy "Toni . 111 : ftf ks-r’ k- glEsfeRb. ]h . Jfwu. Comrf’ts E^spLci-Hj • , ( ’ ; J«.btaH 4 mSl' DeSctPi&Nfi jN.flSTUf 4 d-nW 6 ;. omefX^5T'a^bl 6 cy .florman xcnurric- peje .£. ^ 7 -a'y'ni fe Xej^p unoG>lm."Xi%. e • tin. capX^u.u^ birctm• tt. ‘ 1 * '“ r.— *—>.. tap* jnJtup.eunacap^ [(ji^ta-Tu-acpti. /<. -‘ jbi una ♦«^ a »* ,a • 7 H yile-pafiiay.jx.T’rc-ll’l un»yif«r»' /-fR .£. ujU*. Hid Sememe fakltr m Hcuuetonc unacfueoJo ulefl.pCC^Ht. |>enj£' &£&y]jjJ A bZ' (Minf'^Ult^emnne' tati mllmue^e.^.^/^T^/^^ia^rreaen^ folinf <2e miSWronvr |**n mlleueone-poccm. f enje cAfa^. ykvcr\\b\A .y Lvut. Qli% ^^ablo^v^tfmue folinf. • ”7^e VtifVpc-folinf fa&eS %iopr af SI ifoecone; auefa. / lioc a? flrntrjoftf.tn/Sen^.cju^it?tfixer' Y.R.E.fiaa" t>un£f refhficA^ Toe iKepS widely . efzihui cv xen Gnjfhtf’ unu wx^.J u kbi, juplni&i Tarrr filu^ uriSejpceurtc' .pet. 2>enjjj arm. CbENf. ' EXTEN CHENTH. D OUERE, Tempore regis Edwarih, reddebat xvm libras, de quibus denariis habebat rex E. duas partes, et comes Goduinus terciam. Contra hoc, 5 habebant canonici de sancto Martino medietatem aliam. regi . Burgenses dederunt xx l1 naues A una uice m anno acl xv dies, et in una quaque naui erant homines xx t! et unus. Hoc faciebant pro eo quod eis perdonauerat saccam et socam. Quando missatici regis ueniebant ibi, dabant pro 10 caballo transducendo m 68 denarios in hieme, et n 03 in estate. Burgenses uero inueniebant stiremannum et unum alium adiutorem. Et si plus opus esset, de pecunia eius conducebatar. A festimtate Sancti Miohaelis usque ad i.e. pax festum Sancti Andree, treuua regis erat in uilla. Si quis is earn infregisset, inde propositus regis accipiebat com- munem emendationem. Quicunque manens in uilla assiduus reddebat regi consuetudinem, quietus erat de theloneo per totam Angliam. Omnes ho consuetudi- nes erant ibi, quando Willelmus rex in Angliam uenit. 20 In ipso primo aduentu eius in Angliam, fuit ipsa uilla combusta, et ideo precium eius non potuit computaii quantum ualebat quando episcopus baiocensis earn recepit. Modo appreciatur XL libris, et tamen propositus inde reddit liiii ot libras: Regi quidem xx ti im OT libras de denariis qui sunt XX tt in 25 ora, comiti uero xxx‘“ libras ad numerum. In Douere sunt xxix mansuvo, de quibus rex perdidit consue¬ tudinem. De his habet Robertus de romenel duas, Radulfus de curbespine, in. Willelmus filius Tedaldi, I. Willelmus filius Ogeri, i. Willelmus filius Tedoldi ct Robertus 30 niger, vi. Willelmus filius Goisfridi, m. in quibus erat gihalla burgensium. Hugo de montfort, I domum. Durandus, I. Rannulfus de columbels, I. Wadardus, vi. Filius Modberti unam. Et hi omnes de his domibus reuo- et datorem cant episcopum baiocensem ad protectorem et liberatorem. 35 D e ilia masura quam tenet Rannulfus de columbels quo i.e. utlagcE fuit cuiusdam exulis, concordant quod dimidia terra est loripes regis, et Rannulfus ipse habet utrunque. Hunfridus tenet i masuram, de qua erat forisfactura dimidia regis. Rogerus de Ostreham fecit quandam domum super 40 aquam regis, et tenuit hue usque consuetudinem regis. Nec domus fuit ibi T. R. E. In introitu portus de Douere est unum molendinum quod omnes pene naues confringit per magnam turbationem mans, et maximum damnum fa- cit regi et hominibus, et non fuit ibi T. R. E. De hoc dicit 45 nepos Herberti, quod episcopus baiocensis concessit ilium fieri auunculo suo Herberto filio Iuonis. CHENTII. II as infra scriptas leges regis concordant homines de im° r lestis: hoc est, Boruuar lest, et Estrelest, et Linuuartlest, et Wiuuartlest. Si quis fecerit sepem vel fossatum pro quo strictior fiat pnhlica 5 uia regis, ant arborem stantem extra uiam intra pro- strauerit, et inde ramum vel frondem portauerit, pro una quaque harum forisfacturarum soluet regi c sohdos. Et si ahierit domum non appx - ehensus vel diuadi- atus, tamen minister regis eum sequetur, et C solidis 10 emendabit. De gribrige uero si quis earn fecerit et calum- in calle niatus A aut diuadiatus fuerit, viii libris regi emenda¬ bit : Sin autem; quietus erit erga regem, non erga dominum cuius homo fuerit. De aliis forisfacturis sicuti de gribrige, sed per c solidos emendabit. Has forisfac- 15 turas habet rex super ornnes alodiarios totius comitatus de chent, et super homines ipsorum. Et quando moritur alodiarius, rex inde habet releuationem terras, excepta terra Sanctje Trinitatis, et Sancti Augustini, et Sancti Mar¬ tini : et Exceptis his, Godric de Burnes, et Godric 20 carlesone, et Alnod tilt, et Esber biga, et Siret de cilleham, et Turgis, et Norman, et Azor. Super istos habet rex forisfacturam de capitibus eorum tantummodo. Et de terris eorum habet releuamen, qui habent suam sacam et socam. Et de his terris, scilicet Goslaches, et Boche- 25 land, et alium Bocheland, et tercium Bocheland, et Herste, i iugum de Ora, et i iugum de Herte, Scbildricheham, Macheheue, Ernulfitone, Osla- chintone, Piria, et alia Piria, Brulege, Ospringes, Hortone, habet rex has forisfacturas, Handsocam, 30 Gribrige, Foristel. De adulterio uero per totum chent habet rex hominem, et archiepiscopus mulierem; excepta terra Sanctte Trinitatis, et Sancti Augustini, et Sancti Martini, de quibus rex nichil habet. De latrone qui iudicatus est ad mortem, habet rex medietatem pecunias eius. Et qui exulem re 35 ceperit sine licentia regis, inde habet rex forisfacturam. cild De terris supra nominatis Alnodi et similium eius, habet rex custodiam Vi diebus, apud cantuariam, vel apud sanuuic, et ibi habent de rege cibum et potum. Si non habuerint, sine forisfactura recedunt. Si fuerint premoniti ut conueniant 40 ad sciram, ibunt usque ad pinnedennam, non longius. Et si non uenerint, de hac forisfactura et de abis omnibus rex c sohdos habebit; excepta Gribrige quee viii libris emendatur ; et de callibus sicut superius scriptum est. In Linuuartlest, in briseuuei, habet rex consuetudinem, scilicet 45 ii caretas et n sticas anguillarum pro uno Ineuuardo. Et in terra sophis habet xii denarios pro uno Ineuuardo. Et de uno jugo de Northburg xii denarios, aut unum Ineuuardum. Et de dena xvm denarios. Et de Gara unum Ineuuardum. He teme iacent in Wi et homines de his terris custodiebant regem apud cantuariam, so et apud Sanuuic per hi dies, si rex illuc uenisset. GHENT!!. In lest de Sudtone, et in lest de Ailesford, habuerunt isti sacham et socam: Brixi cilt. Adelold de Elteham. hor Anschil de Becheham. Azor de lesneis. Aluuinus. Wluuardus wit. Ordinc de hortone. Esbern de cillesfelle. Leuenot de Sudtone. Eduuard de Estan. Vlestan et Leuric de Otrinberge. Osuuard de Nord- tone. Edid de Aisiholte. Alret de Ellinges. TERRA CANONICORUM SANCTI MARTINI DE DOVRE. N Lest de Estrede, habebant canonici de sancto Martino, T.R.E. xxi solin In hundredo de Comely et in hundredo de Beusberge. In lest de Linuuarlet habebant in solins, iinum in Estret hundredo, alium in Belissolt hundredo, et tercium in Blachebom hundredo. T.R.E. erant prebend® communes, et reddebant lxi libras 15 inter totum. Modo sunt dims® per singulos, per episcopum Baiocensem. IN BEVSBERG IIVNDREDO. Radulfus de Sancto Sansone tenet i Manerium in prebenda, Cerlen- tone uocatur, et defendit se pro i° solin. Ibi habet m uillanos et mi bordarios cum i caruca. Inter totum ualet lxx solidos. T.R.E. 20 c solidos. Leuuinus tenuit in prebenda. In eadem uilla tenet Willelmus filius Ogerii i solin. Et ibi habet i uillanum et vn bordarios cum dimidia caruca. Et I molinum de XL solidis. Ibi quidam francigena habet I carucam. Isdem Willelmus tenet i monasterium in Douere de episcopo, et reddit ei xi solidos. Canonici calumniantur. 25 Hoc totum ualet vi libras. T.R.E. xii libras. Sired tenuit. In Bochelande tenet Aluin i solin. Et ibi habet vi uillanos et x bordarios cum i caruca et dimidia. Inter totum ualet nil libras. T.R.E. c solidos. Iste idem tenuit in prebenda. In Gocistone tenet Ulric I iugum. Et ibi habet ii uillanos 30 et i bordarium cum I caruca. Ad banc terram pertinent xxv acr® terr® in Comeli hundredo. Et ibi sunt v bordarii cum dimidia caruca. Inter totum ualet xx solidos. T.R.E. x solidos. Elric tenuit in ^fprebenda. IN HOC EODEM IIVNDREDO IACET SANCTA MARGARITA. Ibi habet Sired i solin. Et i carucam in dominio. Et vi bordarios. 35 cum mi seruis. Valet c solidos. T.R.E. mi libras. Pater eiusdem Sired tenuit in prebenda. Ibidem tenet Radulfus i solin. Et habet I carucam in dominio. Et vii bordarios. Valet lx et ix solidos et n denarios. T.R.E. mi libras. Alric tenuit in prebenda similiter. 40 Ibidem tenet Aired I solin. Et habet in dominio i carucam. Et ii uillanos et n bordarios cum dimidia caruca. Valet lx solidos. T.R.E. xx solidos. Pater huius tenuit in prebenda. Ibidem tenet Robertus niger i solin. Et habet ibi m uillanos et vi bordarios cum I caruca. Valet xxx solidos. T.RE. xx solidos. 45 Esmellt tenuit, capellanus R.E. Ibidem tenet Walterus I solin. Et ibi habet m uillanos et v bordarios cum i caruca et dimidia. Valet lx solidos. T.R.E. lxx solidos. Sigar tenuit in prebenda. CHENTII. 5 Ibidem tenet Turbatus dimidium solin. Et ibi habet n uillanos et i bordarium cum dimidia caruca. Et isdem Robertus habet dimidium solin in Coenilai hvndredo. Et ibi dimidiam carucam in dominio. Et v bordarios. Inter totum ualet m libras. T.R.E. mi libras. Goldstan tenuit. 5 Ibidem tenet Eduuine dimidium solin, et adliuc xxv acras terras. In dominio habet dimidiam carucam. Et I uillanum cum dimidia caruca. IN CORNELAI HVNDREDO. habet isdem Eduuinus quater xx et v acras. Et ibi I uillanum cum I caruca. Valet in libras. T.R.E. mi libras. Ipsemet tenuit T.R.E. De hac prebenda sumpsit episcopus Baiocensis vm acras, et dedit Alan clerico suo. 10 Modo habet Vlric de Oxenford. IN CORNELAI HVNDREDO. arcTiidiaconus Xn Addelam, tenet Anschitil i solin. Et ibi habet in dominio ii Caracas cum vi bordariis. Hanc terram tenuit Stigandus archiepiscopus. Huic eidem Anschitillo dedit episcopus baiocensis l acras terra ad Delam, et alias l acras apud sanctam Margaritam, ubi habet i uillanum is et dimidiam carucam. Hse c acras erant de prebendis ut testificantur. Inter totum ualet vm libras. T.R.E. vn libras. IN BEVSBERG HVNDREDO. In Sibertesuualt, tenet Willelmus pictavensis dimidium solin et xii acras, et in Addelam dimidium solin xn acras minus. Et ibi habet ii uillanos et in bordarios cum I caruca et dimidia. Totum hoc ualet 20 lv solidos. T.R.E. nn libras. IN CORNELAI HVNDREDO. In Addelam, tenet Adeloldus m uirgatas. Et ibi habet m uillanos et vm bordarios cum i caruca. Valet et ualuit semper lx solidos. Istemet tenuit T.R.E. IN BEVSBERG HVNDREDO ET IN CORNELAI HVNDREDO. In Addelam, tenet abbas Sancti Augustini I solin. Et ibi habet ra uillanos 25 et vn bordarios cum i caruca et dimidia. Valet xxx solidos. T.R.E. xl solidos. Antecessor eius tenuit in prebenda similiter. In Addelam, tenet Willelmus filius Tedaldi dimidium solin et dimidium iugum. Et ibi habet in dominio i carucam. Et ii uillanos et n bordarios. Valet filius Sired lx solidos. T.R.E. xl solidos. Derinc tenuit. 30 In Sibertesuualt, tenet Sigar i iugum et dimidium. Et ibi habet in dominio dimidiam carucam. Et ii uillanos et i bordarium. Valet xxv solidos. T.R.E. xxxv solidos. Pater ipsius tenuit in prebenda. Nigellus medicus apud sanctam Margaritam tenet I iugum et dimidium. Et ibi habet i uillanum cum n bobus. Valet xx solidos. T.R.E. 35 xxv solidos. Spirites tenuit in prebenda. IN BEVSBERG HVNDREDO. In Ferlingelai, tenet Willelmus filius Gaufridi i solin. Et ibi habet in dominio i carucam. Et un uillanos cum i caruca. Valet nn libras. T.R.E. vi libras. Sired tenuit in prebenda. In Hicham, tenet Balduinus i solin. Et ibi habet mi uillanos et v 40 bordarios cum n caracis. Valet nn libras. T.R.E. c solidos. Eduinus tenuit. In Bocheland tenet Godricus i solin. Et ibi habet n Caracas in dominio. Et m uillanos et mi bordarios cum i caraca. Et una eecclesia Valet vi libras. T.R.E. vm libras. In Sibertesuuald, tenet Vlstan filius Vluuin i solin. Et ibi habet dimidiam carucam. 45 et iii uillapos et ix bordarios cum i caruca. T.R.E. ualebat c solidos. Modo lx solidos. Pater eius tenuit. 6 CHENTH. I N CIYITATE CANTY ARIA, habuit Rex Edwardus l et i burgenses redclentes gablum. Et alios cc et xii super quos habebat sacam et socam. Et in molendina de XL solidis. Modo burgenses gablum reddentes sunt xix. De xxxn obDS 5 aliis qui fuerant; sunt uastati xi in fossato ciuitatis, et archiepiscopus habet ex eis vn, et abbas Sancti Augustini alios xiin pro excambio castelli. Et adhuc sunt cc et xu burgenses, super hi quos habet rex sacam et socam. Et molendina reddentia c et viii solidos. Et theloneum reddens lxyiii solidos. Ibi vin aerie prati qua; 10 solebant esse legatorum regis, modo reddunt de censu xv solidos. Et mille acne silvo infructuoso de qua exeunt xxmi or H-rimo solidi. Inter totum, T.R.E. ualuit li libras. Et tantundem quando uicecomes recepit. Et modo l libris appreciatur. Tamen, qui tenet nunc reddit xxx libras arsas et pensatas, et xxmi libras ad numerum. Super hoc omnia is habet uicecomes c et x solidos. Duas domos duorum burgensium, unam foris, aliam intra ciuitatem, quidam monachus occlesio cantuariensis abstulit. Ha; erant posito in calle Burgenses habuertmt xly mansuras extra ciuitatem, de quibus ipsi habebant gablum et consuetudinem; rex autem habebat sacam et socam. 20 Ipsi quoque burgenses habebant de rege xxx hi acras terra; in gildam suam. Has domos et hanc terrain tenet Rannulfus de Colum- bels. Habet etiam quater xx acras terra; super hoc, quas tenebant bm-genses in aloclia de rege. Tenet quoque v acras terra; qua; iuste pertinent uni occlesio. De his omnibus reuocat 25 isdem Rannulfus ad protectorem episcopum Baiocensem. de Curbespine habet nn mansuras in ciuitatc, quas tenuit quodam concubina heraldi, de quibus est saca et soca regis, sed usque nunc non habuit. baiocensi Radulfus tenet alias xi masuras de episcopo in ipsa ciuitate, 30 que fuerunt Sbern biga, et reddunt xi solidos et n denarios et i obolum. Per totam ciuitatem cantuario habet rex sacam et socam, excepta ten a occlesio Sanctas Trinitatis, et Sancti Augustini, et Eddcuo re°"ino et Alnod cild, et Esber biga, et Siret de Cilleham. Concordatum est de rectis callibus qua; habent per ciuitatem 35 introitum et exitum, quicunque in illis forisfecerit, regi emendabit. Similiter de callibus rectis extra ciuitatem, usque ad unam leugam et m perticas et m pedes. Si quis ergo infra has publicas uias intus ciuitatem vel extra foderit, vel palum fixerit, sequitur Blum propositus regis ubicunque abierit, 40 et emendam accipiet ad opus regis. Archiepiscopus calumniatur forisfacturam in uiis extra ciuitatem utraque parte ubi terra sua est. Quidam propositus, Brumannus nomine, T.R.E. cepit consue- tudines de extraneis mercatoribus in terra Sanctas Trinitatis et Sancti Augustini, Qui, postea, T.R.A. ante archiepiscopum Lanfrancum et episcopum baiocensem reco°-- 45 novit se iniuste accepisse, et, Sacramento facto, iuravit quod ipso occlesio suas consuotudines quietas habuennt R.E. tempore. Et exinde utreque occlesio in sua ten a habueiunt consuetudines suas, iudicio baronum regis qui placitum tenuerunt. C episcopu iuitas Rovecestre, T.R.E, ualebat c solidos. Quando A re Modo ualet xx libras; tamen ille qui tenet reddit xl libras. episcopus recepit, similiter. CHENTH. ITEM POSSESSIO SANCTI MARTINI. D E communitate Sancti Martini habent simul m canonici unum solin et xvi acras; id est Sired, Godric, et Seuuen. In hac terra sunt nn or uillani et ix bordarii cum una caruca. Reddun ; xxii solidos. De Lest Limwarlet. unum solinum in Blache- burne hundredo. Et ibi sunt ix uillani cum n carucis. Reddunt xvi solidos et vm denarios. In Stret himdredo iacet unum solin de Stanetdeste. Ibi vn uillani habent n carucas et dimidiam. Et vii bordarii. Et unum pratum. xvi solidos et vm denarios. In Bilesold hundredo, unum solinum de > Stanestede. ibi sunt vii uillani et vii bordarii. Et habent iiu carucas. Et reddunt xx solidos n denariis minus. Ad ista m a solina sunt v den®. Et vi uillani et v bordarii. Et reddunt ix solidos m denariis minus, habent m carucas et dimidiam. In Brensete paululum tell-®. sunt ii uillani et m bordarii, et habent dimidiam carucam. Reddunt L denarios. 1 Ilia nn or solina supradicta habent canonici Sancti Martini in commu¬ nitate inter nemus et planum. T.R.E. ualebant x libras, modo similiter. Terra Nordeuuode et Terra Ripe, et Terra Brandet reddunt xx solidos et vi denarios ad Sanctum Martinum, in elemosina. In inland Sancti Martini manent vii bordarii cum dimidia caruca. Reddunt Ibi est unus rusticus nx solidos ad calciamenta canonicorum. Sancta Margarita reddit vm libras. Tlieloneum de doure, T.R.E. ualebat vm libras, modo xxtt libras. Tres ®cclesi® apud Doueram reddunt xxxvi solidos et vm denarios. De pastura Medrecliue et de hortis douere exeunt ix solidi et ini denarii. Vna pastura in Sibertesuualt. xvi denarios reddit. Sanctus Martinus habet x molendina et dimidium. reddunt vn libras. T.R.E. tantundem reddiderunt. Modo appreciantur xn libris, sed non ad proficuum canonicorum. Sub illis molinis manent vm homines. Apud scortebroc una pastura. reddit ii solidos. De hac communitate habet archiepiscopus, singulis annis, lv solidos. Ibi sunt vi homines cum i caruca et dimidia. In communi terra Sancti Martini sunt cccc 1 ® acr® et dimidia, qu® hunt ii solinos et dimidium. H®c terra nunquam reddidit aliquid consue- tudinis vel scoti, quia xxmi solini h®c omnia adquietant. Apud Ripam sunt c acr® qu® se adquietant ubi T.R.E. se adquietabant. Apud Nordeude sunt l acr®, et c apud Brand, que adquietant se ubi et superiora. In hac terra sunt in uillani et ix bordarii. habent i carucam et dimidiam. Hec omnia, si canonici ha- berent sicuti ius esset, ualerent illis lx libras singulis annis; modo non habent nisi xlvii libras et vr solidos, et mi denarios. Rannulfus de Columbels aufert eis unum pratum. Rotbertus de rome- nel aufert eis, singulis annis, xx denarios, et unam salinam, et unam piscariam. Herbertus filius Iuonis dedit episcopo baiocensi markam ami molinum molinum pro uno molino eorum, nolentibus illis. Lanbertus unum. Wadard unum. Radulfus de curbespine unum. A -cAlnod, per uiolentiam Heraldi, abstulit Sancto Martino Merclesham et Hauochesten, pro quibus dedit canonicis iniquam commutationem. Modo tenet Robertus de Romenel quod ei canonici calum- niantur semper. IIIC ANNOTANTUR TENENTES TERRAS IN CHENT. Comes Eustachius. I. Hex Willelmvs. VIII. II. Archiepiscopus Cantuariensis, IX. III. et Monachi et homines eius. X. IV. Episcopus Rofecestrensis. XI. V. Episcopus Baiocensis. XII. VI. Abbatia de Batailge. XIII. VII. Abbatia Sancti Augustini. reddunt 8 CHENTH. TERRA REGIS. IN DIMIDIO LEST DE SVDTONE. IN ACHESTAN HVNDREDO. R ex WILLELMVS tenet Tarentefort. Pro uno solino et tlimidio se defendit. Terra est xl a carucarum. In dominio sunt n Caracas. Et cxlii uillani cum x bordariis habent Lin carucas. Ibi sunt m servi. Et i molendinum. Prati xxii acras. Pasturte xl acrae. De silua yiii denas parutE, et m magnae. Ibi n hedae, id est n° portus. uicecomes T.R.E. ualuit lx libras, et tantundem quando Haimo recepit. 10 Modo appreciatur ab anglis lx libris; pnepositus uero francigena, qui tenet ad firmam, dicit quia ualet quater xx li libras et x libras. Ipse tamen reddit de isto manerio lxx libras pensatas, et cxi solidos de denariis xx t! in ora, et vn libras et xxvi denarios ad numerum. Super hasc reddit uicecomiti C solidos. 15 T_T omines de hundredo testificantur, quod de isto Manerio regis ablatum est unum pratum, et unum alnetum, et unum molendinum, et xx t! acrae teme, et adliuc tantum prati quantum pertinet ad x acras terra;, que omnia erant in firma regis E. dum uiueret. Hecc ualent xx 1 ' solidos. Dicunt autem quod Osuuard tunc uicecomes pnestitit ea ^cius. 20 Alestan prasposito Lundonias. Et modo tenent heltus dapifer et nepos. rriestantur quoque quod Hagelei de isto manerio ablata est, quee se defenclit pro dimidio solin. Ilanc terram tenebat uicecomes, et quando uicecomitatum amittebat, in firma regis remanebat. Ita permansit et post mortem RE. Modo tenet Hugo de 25 port cum Lira acris terras plus. Totum hoc ualet xv libras. De eodem Manerio regis adhuc sunt ablata; vi acras terns, uicecomes et quaedam silua, quas isdem Osuuardus posuit extra Manerium per quoddam uaclimonium XL solidorum. yEcclesiam huius Manerii tenet episcopus de Rouecestre, et ualet lx solidos. 30 Extra banc simt adliuc ibi in aecclesiolas. IN LEST DE ELESFORD. IN LAVROCIIESFEL HVNDREDO. R ex W. tenet Elesford. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est xv carucarum. In dominio sunt in carucas. Et xl uillani cum v bordariis habent xv carucas. Ibi vm serui. Et i molendinum xl 35 denariorum. Et xlhi acras prati. Silua t.xx porcorum. uicecomes Inter totum ualebat. T.R.E. xv libras. Et tantundem quando Haimo recepit. modo ualet xx libras. Tamen reddit xxxi libras. Et uicecomes inde habet in libras. De hoc Manerio tenet Ansgotus juxta rouecestre tantum terra; quod appreciatur vn libris. 40 Episcopus etiam de Rouecestre, pro excambio terre in qua castellum sedet, tantum de hac terra tenet quod xvn em solidos et ira or denarios ualet. dimidio IN LEST DE MIDDELTVNE IN MIDDELTVN HVNDREDO. J^ cx W. tenet Middeltvne. Pro quater xx li solins se defendit. Extra hos, sunt in dominio ira solins. Et ibi iii 45 carucee in dominio. In hoc Manerio ccc H et ix uillani cum t.xxtiit bordariis. habent clxvh carucas. Ibi sunt vi molendina de xxx solidis. Et xvm im acras prati. Ibi xxvn salina: de xxvii solidis. CHENTH. Ibi xxxii piscarise do xxti solidis et vm dcnariis. Do theloneo xl solidi. De pastura xin solidi et mi denarii. Silua ccxx porcorum. Et homines de Walto reddunt L solidos pro Ineuuardo et aueris. In hoc Manerio sunt x servi. Inter totum. T.R.E.-ualebat cc libras uicecomes ad numerum. Et tantundem quando Haimo recepit. Et modo similiter. De hoc Manerio tenet Hugo de port vm solins et unum iugum, qui T.R.E. erant, cum aliis solins, in consuetudine. Ibi habet in carucas in dominio. Hmc terra quam tenet Hugo de port ualet xx libras qu® computantur in cc Us libris totius Manerii MiddeltJj'N. qui tenet reddit cxl libras ad ignem et ad pensam, et insuper xv libras et vi solidos n denariis minus ad nu- uicecomiti mcrum. Haimoni dat pr®positus xn libras. De silua regis habet Wadardus tantum quod reddit xvi denarios per annum. Et dimidiam denam tenet quam T.R.E. quidam uillanus tenuit. Et Ahiold cild duas partes cuidam uillano per uim abstulit. iEcclesias et decimas hujus Manerii tenet abbas Sancti Augustini. Et xl solidi de mi solins regis exeunt ei. IN LEST DE WIWAELET. IN FAVRESHANT HYNDREDO. ex W. tenet Favresiiaxt. Pro vn solins se defendit. Terra est xvn carucarum. In dominio sunt 11“. Ibi xxx uillani cum XL bordariis habent xxim carucas. Ibi v serui. Et i molinus de xx solidis. Et ii° acr® prati. Silua c porcorum. Et de pastura siliue xxxi solidi et n denarii. Mercatum de mi libris. Et n” salin® de hi solidis et n denariis. Et in de xx denariis cantuaria ciuitate m e< hag® A ad hoc Manerium pertinent. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E. ualebat lx libras v solidis minus. Et post, lx libras. Modo ualet quater xx 1 ' lioras. C CHENTH. TERRA ARCHIEPISCOPI CAN TVARIENSIS. I N CIYITATE CANTVARIA habet archiepiscopus xir bur- genses. Et xxxn mansuras quas tenent clerici de uilla in gildam suam. Et reddunt xxxv solidos. Et unum molendinum de v solidis. SandwicE iacet in suo proprio hundredo. Hoc burgum tenet archiepiscopus, et est de uestitu monachorum, et reddit simile seraitium regi sicut Dovere. Et hoc testificantur homines de isto burgo. quod antequam rex Edwardus dedisset ilium Sanctje Trinitati, mortis reddebat regi xv libras. Tempore A R.E. non erat ad firmam. Quando recepit archiepiscopus, reddebat xl libras de firma et xl de milia A allecibus ad uictum monachorum. In anno quo facta sanuuic est heec descriptio, reddidit A i libram de firma, et alleces sicut prius. T.R.E. erant ibi ccc et vn mansune hos- octoginta pitatm. modo sunt plus lxxvi. id est, simul ccc lxxx iii. « IN ACHESTAN HVNDREDO. -A.rchiepiscopus cantuariensis tenet in dominio TARENT. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est. In dominio est una caruca. Et xxn uillani cum vii cotariis habent vn carucas. Ibi vi serui. Et n molendina de l solidis. Ad hoc Manerium pertinent v burgenses in rouecestre. reddunt vi solidos et vm denarios. Ibi vm aerie prati. Silua xx porcorum. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E. ualuit xmi libras. Quando recepit, x libras, modo xv libras et x solidos. Tamen qui tenet Manerium reddit xvm libras. .. I solins pse archiepiscopus tenet Otefort in dominio. Pro vm A se defendit. Terra est xlii carucarum. In dominio sunt vi carucas. Ibi c et unus uillans cum xvm bordariis habent xlv carucas. Ibi vm serui. Et vi molini de lxxii solidis. Et l aerie prati. Silua cl porcorum. De hoc Manerio tenent iii teigni i solin et dimidium. Et ibi habent in dominio iii carucas. Et xvi uillanos cum xi bordariis habentes mi carucas. Ibi v serui. Et ii molendina de xxrni solidis. Et xxvui acras prati. Silua xxx porcorum. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E., et post, ualebat Modo appreciatur dominium archiepiscopi lx libris. Teignorum xii libris. Ricardus de Tonebrige quod in sua leuga tenet appreciatin' x libris. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Soxdresse. Pro uno solin et dimidio se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt m caruca;. Et xxvii uillani cum ix bordariis habent vm carucas. Ibi vm serui. Et iii molendina et dimidium de i.e. vi d XIII solidis et dimidio. Ibi vm acne prati. Silua lx porcorum. Ibi mcclesia. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E. ualebat xn libras. Quando recepit, xvi libras. Et modo xvm libras. Tamen reddit xxm libras, et unum militem in servitio archiepiscopi. IN HELMESTREI HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Bix. Pro m bua solins se defendebat T.R.E. et modo pro n obus - Terra est In dominio sunt n caruca:. Et xli uillani cum xv bordariis habent x carucas. Ibi mcclesia. Et iii molendina de xlviii solidis. Et vm acne prati. Silua c porcorum. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E., et post, ualebat xii libras. Et modo xx libras. Et tamen reddit xxx libras, et vm solidos. IN LITELAI HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Eriiede. Pro mi solins se defendit. Terra est vm carucarum. In dominio sunt W. Et xxvii uillani cum n bordariis habent vm carucas. CHENTH. 11 Ibi ascclesia. Et hi molendina tie l solidis et vi denariis. Ibi v serai. Et x acne prati. Silua xl porcorum. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E. ualebat xii libras. Et tantundem quando recepit, Modo xvi libras. Et tamen rcddit xxi libras. 5 IN LEST DE ELESFORT. IN LAYROCHESFEL HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet in dominio Metlinges. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est vii carucarum. In dominio sunt in caracee. Et xxxviii uillani cum xn bordariis habent v Caracas. Ibi jecclesia. Et v serui. Et n molendina de x solidis. Et xxi acne prati. Silua lx porcorum. In totis 10 ualentiis. T.R.E. ualebat ix libras. Similiter quando recepit. Et modo tantundem. Et tamen redclit xv libras. IN TOLLENTREV HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet in dominio N ORFLVET. Pro vi solins defendebat se T.R.E. Et modo pro v. Terra est xiiii carucarum. In dominio sunt n®. Et xxxvi uillani habent x Caracas. Ibi tecclesia. Et vii serui. is Et i molinus de x solidis, cum una piscaria. Et xx acne prati. Silua xx porcorum. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Quando recepit, xn libras. Et modo xxvn libras. Et tamen reddit xxxvu libras et x solidos. Ricardus de tonebrige quod tenet in sua leuga de hoc Manerio ualet ^fxxx solidos. IN BROTEHAM HVNDREDO. 20 Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Broteham. Pro vm solins se defendit. Terra est xx carucarum. In dominio sunt m Caracas. Et lxxvi uillani cum xviii bordariis habent xnn Caracas. Ibi ascclesia. Et x serai. Et hi molendina de xv solidis. Et ix cm aerie prati. Silua, quando fractificat, quingentorum porcorum. 25 De hoc Manerio tenet Willelmus dispensator i solin. Et ibi habet i carucam in dominio. Et n uillanos cum dimidia caruca. De eodem Manerio tenet Goisfridus de archiepiscopo I solin. Et ibi habet I carucam. Et vi uillanos cum i bordario habentes n Caracas. De ipso Manerio tenet Farman i iugum et dimidium de archiepiscopo. Et ibi habet 30 m Caracas. Et vi uillanos cum xn cotariis habentes ii carucas. Ibi x serui. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E. ualebat hoc Manerium xv libras. Et post, xvi libras. Modo appreciatin' dominium archiepiscopi xxiiii libris. Et tamen reddit xxxv libras. Militum, xi libris. Ricardus de Tonebrige quod tenet in sua leuga appreciatur xv libris. 35 IN MEDDESTAN HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet MEDDESTANE. Pro x solins se defendit. Terra est xxx carucarum. In dominio sunt hi carucce. Et xxv uillani cum xxi bordariis habent xxv carucas. Ibi acclesia. Et x serui. Et v molini de xxxvi solidis et vm denariis. Ibi n piscariie de cclxx anguillis. 40 Ibi x aerie prati. Silua xxx porcorum. De hoc Manerio tenent de archiepiscopo iii milites mi solins. Et ibi habent m Caracas et dimidiam in dominio. Et xxxii uillanos cum x bordariis habentes vi carucas. Et x seruos. Et habent i molinum de v solidis. Et xiii acras prati. Et n piscarias et dimidiam de CLXXX anguillis. Et ii salinas. 45 Siluam xxm porcorum. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E. ualebat hoc Manerium xiiii libras. Quando recepit, xn libras. Et modo dominium archiepiscopi ualet xx libras. Militum, xv libras et x solidos. Monachi cantuarienses habent omni anno de duobus hominibus huius Manerii xx solidos. CITENTII. IN CETEHAM HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Gelingeham. Pro vi solins se 'defendit. Terra est xv carucarum. In dominio sunt n carucee. Et xlii uillani cum xvi bordariis habent xv carucas. Ibi secclesia. Et in serui. Et iii pis- 5 carise de xlii solidis et viii denariis. Et i molinus de xvi solidis et viii denariis. Et xnn. aerie prati. Silua xx porcorum. De hoc Manerio tenet quidam francigena terram ad I carucam. Et ibi habet ii bordarios. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E. ualebat hoc Manerium xv libras. Quando recepit, xn libras. Et modo xxm libras. Et tamen reddit 10 xxvi libras xii denariis minus. Quod tenet francigena xl solidos. IN ROCVLF HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Rocvlf. Pro viii solins se defendit. Terra est xxx carucarum. In dominio sunt hi carucse. Et quater xx 1 ' et x uillani cum xxv bordariis habent xxvii carucas. is Ibi secclesia. Et I molinus de xxv denariis. Et xxxm aerse prati. Silua xx porcorum. Et v salime de lxiiii denariis. Et una piscaria. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E. ualuit hoc Manerium xim libras. Quando recepit, similiter. Et modo xxxv libras. Super hsec habet archiepiscopus vn libras et vn solidos. 20 Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Nortone in dominio. Pro xni so¬ lins se defendit. Terra est xxvi carucarum. In dominio sunt ii” carucse. Et quater xx 1 ' et xii uillani cum xl bordariis habent lix carucas et dimidiam. Ibi secclesia. Et x acne prati. Silua l porcorum. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E. ualuit hoc Manerium xxnn libras 25 et v solidos. Et post, tantundem. Et modo reddit archiepiscopo l libras et xnn solidos et ii denarios. Et archidiacono xx solidos. De hoc Manerio tenet Vitalis de archiepiscopo in solins et unum iugum et xii acras terrse. Et ibi habet v carucas. Et xxix bordarios. Et v seruos. Et vii salinas de xxv solidis et mi denariis. so Ibi est secclesia. Et una parua dena silvse. Inter totum ualet xnn libras et vi solidos et vi denarios. IN BOROWARTLEST. IN P 1 TEHAM HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Piteham. Pro vn solins se defendit. Terra est ad xx carucas. In dominio sunt in carucse. Et xxxu as uillani cum xxi bordariis habent xix carucas. Ibi ii secclesia;. Ibi ii° serui. Et xni aerse prati. Silua xx porcorum. In totis ualentiis. T.R.E. ualuit hoc Manerium xvii libras et vi solidos et hi denarios. Et post, tantundem. Et modo ualet xx libras. De hoc Manerio tenent Godefridus et Nigellus de archiepiscopo 40 unum solin et dimidium et iugum. Et ibi habent mi carucas. Et nil uillanos cum viii bordariis habentes in carucas. Inter totum ualet ix libras. De his habent monachi vm solidos per annum. IN ESTVRSETE HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Estvrsete in dominio. Pro vn so- 45 lins se defendit. Terra est xx carucarum. In dominio sunt nil carucse. Et xvii uillani cum quater xx 45 et hi bordariis habent xvi carucas. iEcclesia. Et Ibi A xii molins de ini libris et v solidis. Et c acra: prati. Silua L porcorum. Ad hoc Manerium pertinuerunt T.R.E. in ciuitate li i masurse. Et modo non sunt nisi xxv, quia alia; n so sunt destructse I noua hospitatione archiepiscopi. CHENTH. 13 In totis ualentiis: T.R.E., et post, ualebat xxim libras et xn solidos, et vi denarios, Modo, ualet xl libras. De hoc Manerio habent v homines archiepiscopi unum solin et vi iuga. Et ibi habent v carucas et dimidiam in dominio. Et vra uillanos cum xxvi 5 bordariis habentes n carucas. Et m molendina. Et xxim acras prati. Silua x porcorum. Inter totum, ualet ix libras. De ipso Manerio tenet Haimo uicecomes dimidium solin de archiepiscopo. Et ibi habet ii carucas. cum v bordariis. Et uno seruo. Et n molendina de xv solidis. Valet c solidos. IN BERIiAM HVNDREDO. 10 Ipse archiepiscopus tenet in dominio BVRNES. Pro vi solins se defendit. Terra est l carucarura. In dominio sunt v carries. Et LXim uillani cum Liii bl,s bordariis habent xxx carucas et dimidiam. Ibi acclesia. Et n molendina de viii solidis et vi denariis. Et xx acras prati. Silua xv porcorum. De herbagio xxvn denarii. In totis ualentiis: T.R.E., et post, ualebat xx li libras, modo, xxx libras. is IN BOLTVN HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet in dominio BOLTVNE. Pro v solins et dimidio se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n carucas. Et xxxi uillanus cum xxxi bordariis habentes xv carucas. Ibi mi acras prati. Et piscaria de x denariis. Salina de xvi denariis. Silua xlv porcorum. In 20 totis ualentiis: T.R.E., et post, ualebat xv libras et xvi solidos et m denarios et i obolum. Modo, ualet xxx libras et xvi solidos et iii denarios et i obolum. IN CALE HELLE HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet in dominio ClEERlNGES. Pro vm solins se defendit. Terra est xl carucarum. In dominio est unum solin. Et ibi mi carucas et dimidia. Ibi xxvi 25 uillani cum xxvn bordariis habent xxvn carucas. Ibi xn serui. Et unus molinus de xl denariis. Ibi xxv acras prati. Silua xxvi porcorum. In totis ualentiis: T.R.E. ualebat xxim libras. Quando recepit, tantundem. Modo, appreciatur xxxim libris. Et tamen reddit lx libras. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet in dominio PLVCHELEI. Pro uno solin se defendit. 30 Terra est xii carucarum. In dominio n carucas et dimidia. Et xvi uillani cum vii bordariis habent xi carucas. Ibi vm serui. Et xn acras prati et dimidia. Silua cxl porcorum. Inter totum: T.R.E. ualebat xii libras. Quando recepit, vm libras. Et modo, xv libras. Et tamen reddit xx libras. IN LEST DE ESTREI. IN WINGEHAM HVNDREDO. 35 Ipse archiepiscopus tenet WlNGEHAM in dominio. Pro xl solins se defendebat T.R.E. Et modo pro xxxv. Terra est In dominio sunt vm carucas. Et quater xx li et v uillani cum xx bordariis habentes lvii carucas. Ibi vm serui. Et ii molendina de xxxim solidis. Silua v porcorum. Et ii 1 " siluula ad clausuram. In totis ualentiis: T.R.E. ualebat 40 lxxvii libras. Quando recepit, similiter. Et modo, c libras. De hoc Manerio tenet Willelmus de arris i solin In Fletes. Et ibi habet in dominio i carucam. Et mi uillanos. Et unum militem. cum i caruca. Et unam piscariam. cum salina de xxx denariis. Totum ualet xl solidos. De ipso Manerio tenent v homines archiepiscopi v solins et dimidium et m a iuga. 45 Et ibi habent in dominio vm carucas. Et xxn bordarios. Et viii seruos. Inter totum, ualet xxi libras. IN LINGEBRIGE HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet in dominio MERSEHAM. Pro vi solins se defendebat T.R.E. Et modo pro m. Terra est xu carucarum. In dominio sunt m caruca. so Et xxxix uillani cum ix bordariis habentes xvi carucas. Ibi acclesia. Et ii molendina de v solidis. Et n salina de v solidis. Et xiri acra prati. Silua xxx porcorum. D 14 CHENTH. In totis ualentiis: T.R.E. ualebat, et post, x libras. Modo, xx libras. IN LIMOWART LEST. IN BELICOLT HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Aldintone in dominio. Pro xxr solin se defendebat T.R.E. Et modo, pro xv solins. Terra c caracarum. In dominio sunt xm ' 5 carucae. Et ducenti uillani, x minus, cum l bordariis babent lxx carucas. Ibi cEcdesia. Et xm serui. Et m molendina de xvi solidis. Et m piscario de xxi denariis. Ibi clxx acrae prati. Silua lx porcorum. In totis ualentiis: T.R.E. ualebat nxn libras. Et tantundem quando recepit. Modo, reddit c libras et xx solidos. 10 Ip se archiepiscopus tenet uillam quae uocatur Sanctus Martinus, et pertinet ad Estursete, et iacet in ipso hundredo, et defendit se pro uno solin et dimidio. Terra est In dominio sunt n carucae et xxxvi bordarii. Ad hanc terram pertinent vn burgenses in cantuaria, reddentes viii solidos et mi denarios. Ibi v molendina de xx solidis. Et parua silua. 15 In hac uilla tenet Radulfus dimidium solin de archiepiscopo. Et ibi habet ii carucas in dominio. Et v uillanos cum m bordariis habentes n carucas et dimidiam. T.R.E. ualebat vii libras, dimidium solin Sancti Martini, et aliud dimidium solin, ualebant semper mi libras. In ROMENEL sunt quater xx et v burgenses qui pertinent ad Aldinton, 20 Manerium archiepiscopi, et ualuerunt, et modo ualent domino, vi libras. D e ipso Manerio Aldinton iacet in Limes dimidium iugum et dimidia uirga. Archiepiscopus tenet in dominio. Et ibi habet i carucam. Et unum uillanum cum xvm bordariis habentes i carucam et dimidiam. Ibi sunt vii presbyteri qui reddunt vii libras et v solidos. Terra est n carucarum. Ualet et ualuit xn libras. 25 Et tamen reddit xv libras. Do eodem manerio tenet comes de Ow Estotinghes pro i Manerio. Pro uno solin et dimidio se defendebat T.R.E. Et modo, pTo ruio solin tantum. Terra est vm carucarum. In dominio sunt n 16 . Et xxvii uillani cum xm bordariis habentes vn carucas. Et i molinum de xxv denariis. Ibi fecclesia. Et xx acne prati. 30 Silua x porcorum. Et vm serui. T.R.E., et post, ualebat vm libras. Modo, x libras. IN MONIBERGE HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet in dominio Leminges. Pro vii solids se defendit. Terra est lx carucarum. In dominio sunt iiu. Et c et unus uillanus cum xvi bordariis habentes lv carucas. Ibi aecclesia. Et x serui. Et i molinus de xxx denariis. 35 Et i piscaria de xl anguillis. Et xxx acrae prati. Silua c porcorum. Ibi pertinent vi burgenses in Hede. T.R.E. ualebat xxim libras. Et postea, xl libras. Et modo, similiter. Et tamen reddit lx libras. De hoc Manerio tenent m homines archiepiscopi n solins et dimidium, et dimidium iugum. Et ibi habent v carucas in dominio. Et xx uillanos cum xvi bordariis 40 habentes v carucas et dimidiam. Et i seruum. Et u molinos de vn solidis et vi denariis. Et xl acras prati. Silua xi porcorum. Ibi n aecclesiae. Inter totum, ualet xi libras. IN SELEBRIST HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Newedene. Pro imo solin se defendit. Terra est Ibi sunt xxv uillani cum mi bordariis habentes v carucas. Ibi est mer- 45 catum de xl solidis, v denariis minus. Silua xl porcorum. Inter totum: T.R.E. ualebat c solidos. Quando recepit, xii libras. Et modo, x libras. Et tamen propositus reddit xvm libras et x solidos. CHENTH. TERRA MILITVM EIUS. IN ACHESTAN IIVNDREDO. _A_nsgotus tenet de archiepiscopo FORNINGEHAM. Pro uno solino se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n" carucse. Et xm uillani cum v bordariis habentes hi carucas et dimidiam. 5 Ibi vi acrfe prati. Silua xx porcorum. Et Ricardus de Tonebrige de eadem silua tantundem habet in sua leuua. T.R.E. ualebat hoc Manerium vii libras. Et modo, xi libras. De his habent monachi cantuarienses rai libras ad uestitum suum, et Radulfus filius Vnspac tenet Elesford de archiepiscopo. 10 Pro vi solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt v Caracas. Et xxix uillani cum ix bordariis habent xv carucas. Ibi ii secclesise. Et ix serui. Et n molendina de xliii solidis. Et xxix acrae prati. Silua xx porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat xvi libras. Et modo, ualet xx libras. De hoc Manerio tenet Ricardus de Tonebrige tantum 15 siluai unde exire possunt xx porci. Et I molinum de v solidis. Et unam piscariam, in sua leuua. Mulgerius tenet de archiepiscopo m iuga in Orpinton. Et pro t'anto se defendebat extra Orpinton. T.R.E. Modo sunt ii iuga intra Orpinton, et terbium extra. Terra est In dominio 20 i caruca. Et nn uillani cum i bordario, et mi seruis, et dimidia caruca. Et iii acree prati. Et silua xi porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat xl solidos. Quando recepit, xx solidos. Et modo, l solidos. JbLaimo uicecomes tenet de archiepiscopo Briestede. Pro uno solin et dimidio se defendit. Terra est x carucarum. In dominio sunt ii®. 25 Et xxim uillani cum xvi bordariis habent xn carucas. Ibi aocclesia. Et xv serui. Et n molendina de xxim solidis. Silua quater xx porcorum. Et de herbagio ix solidi et vi denarii. Inter totum: T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Et tantundem quando recepit. Et modo, xvn libras. Hoc Manerium tenuit Alnod abbas de archiepiscopo cantuariensi. 30 Comes de Ow tenet de archiepiscopo Olecvmbe. Pro n et dimidio solins A se defendebat T.R.E. Et modo, pro n tantum. Terra est ix carucarum. In dominio sunt n Caracas. Et xxm uillani cum vm bordariis habent vii carucas. Ibi ascclesia. Et unum molendinum de nn solidis. Et vm acne prati. Silua quater xx porcorum. Inter totum : T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Quando recepit, 35 vm libras. Modo, xi libras. Hoc Manerium tenuit Alfer de archiepiscopo. IN HAIBORNE HVNDREDO. Radulfus filius turaldi tenet Boltone de archiepiscopo. Pro dimidio solin se defendit, et iacet in vi solins de Holinge- borne. Terra est i caracal et dimidiee. In dominio est una caruca. Et m uillani 40 cum ri bordariis habent i carucam. Ibi ascclesia. Et n acne prati. Et silua xvi porcorum. Inter totum, ualet et ualuit semper xl solidos. IN FAVERSHANT HVNDREDO. iAicardus homo archiepiscopi tenet de eo Levelant. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio i caruca. Et n uillani cum i bordario 45 habent i carucam. Silua v porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualebat xxx solidos. T ^fmodo xx solidos. Isdem Ricardus tenet de archiepiscopo. IN BOLTONE HVNDREDO Gravenel. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est i caruca. Et vm uillani cum x bordariis habent ii carucas. Ibi v serai. Et x acree prati.. Et mi salime de mi solidis. T.R.E., so et post, ualuit c solidos. modo, vi libras. De his habent monachi cantuarienses ^fxx solidos. CHSNTH. IN CALEHELLE HVNDREUO. Grodefridus dapifer tenet de archiepiscopo Leriiam. Pro n solin se defendit. Terra est In dorninio sunt n carucEe. Et xv uillani cum n bordariis habent mi carucas. lbi mi serui. Et vi acne prati. Et I molinus de vn solidis. Et silua de x porcis. Inter totum, ualet viii libras. Et tamen reddit xn libras et x solidos. IN THERHAM HVNDREDO. Isdem Godefridus tenet de archiepiscopo, in Scape, dimidium solin. Terra est In dorninio i caruca cum n bordariis. Et im serui. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xxx solidos. Modo, im libras. Et tamen reddit c solidos. IN ESTREI HVNDREDO. Osbernus filius Letardi tenet I iugum de archiepiscopo in BOCOLAND. Et ibi liabet in dorninio i carucam. Et ualet x solidos. Willelmus folet tenet de archiepiscopo Flenguessam. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Ibi habet vi uillanos cum i caruca et dimidia. Isdem Willelmus tenet Estenberge de archiepiscopo. Et pro dimidio solin se defendit. Et ibi habet xn uillanos cum i caruca et dimidia. ^fxxx solidos. He terree ualebant, T.R.E. XL solidos. Quando archiepiscopus recepit, x solidos. Modo, IN HEN HVNDREDO. Hugo de Montfort tenet de archiepiscopo Salteode. Pro vn solins se defendebat T.R.E. Et modo, pro m solins. Terra est xv carucarum. In dorninio sunt n carucce. Et xxxiii uillani cum xn bordariis habentes ix carucas et dimidiam. Ibi tecclesia. Et n serui. Et ix molendina de xx solidis. Et xxxirr acrse prati. Silua quater xx h porcorum. Ad hoc Manerium pertinent ccxxv burgenses in Burgo hedce. Inter burgum et Manerium ualebat T.R.E. xvi libras. Quando recepit, vm libras. Modo, inter totum, xxix libras et vi solidos et im denarios. IN ESTRA 1 TES HVNDREDO Willelmus de Eddesham tenet de archiepiscopo Berewic pro uno Manerio. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est hi carucarum. In dorninio sunt n. Et ix uillani cum ix bordariis habent i carucam et dimidiam. Ibi xvui acras prati. Et Silua xx porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, vn libras. Et tamen reddit xi libras. IN LAMPORT HVNDREDO. Hobertus de Romenel tenet de archiepiscopo Lamport. Pro uno solin et dimidio se defendit. Terra est vi carucarum. In dorninio sunt ii“. Et xxix uillani cum ix bordariis habent ix carucas. Ibi vn salinte de vni solidis et ix denariis. Ad hoc Manerium pertinent xxi burgenses qui sunt in Romenel, de quibus habet archiepiscopus in forisfacturas. latrocinium, pacem fractam, foristellum. Rex uero habet omne seruitium ab eis. Et ipsi habent omnes consuetuclines, et alias forisfacturas pro seruitio ma¬ ils, et sunt in manu regis. T.R.E., et post, ualuit x libras. Et modo, xvi libras. Av illelmus tenet de archiepiscopo Tilemanestone. Pro uno solin se se defendit. In dorninio sunt n carucee, et v bordarii. Olim xx solidos. modo, ualet xxx solidos. CHENTH. 17 III. TERRA MONACIIORUM ARCHIEPISCOPI. IN IIELMESTREl HVNDREDO. k rchiepiscopus cantuariensis tenet Orpintvx. Pro hi solins se defendebat ijk T.R.E. Et modo, pro n solins et dimidio. Terra est In dominio sunt n® carucas. Et xlvi uillani cum xxv bordariis habentes xxui carucas. Ibi in molendina de xvi solidis et ini denariis. Et x acres prati. Et v® deme siluie de l porcis. In totis ualentiis: T.R.E. ualebat xv libras. Quando recepit, viii libras. Et modo, xxv libras. Et tamen reddit xxvm libras. Ibi sunt n“ mcclesim. IN LEST DE ELESFORD. IN LITEFELLE HVNDREDO. Xpse archiepiscopus tenet Peciieiiam. Pro vi solins se defendebat T.R.E. Et modo, 10 pro v solins et uno iugo. Terra est x carucarum. In dominio sunt n 10 . Et xvi uillani fecclesia. Et cum xiTiT bordariis habent nn carucas et dimidiam. Ibi A x serui. Et I molendinum. Et vi acrte prati. Silua x porcorum. De terra liuius Manerii tenet unus homo archiepiscopi dimidium solin. Et cum his vi solins geldabat T.R.E. quamuis non pertineret Manerio, nisi de scoto, quia libera terra erat. 15 De eadem Manerio tenet Ricardus de Tonebrige n solins et unum iugum. Et ibi habet xxvii uillanos habentes vii carucas. Et siluam x porcorum. Et totum ualet mi libras. T.R.E. ualebat Manerium xn libras. Quando recepit archiepiscopus, vm libras. Et modo, quod habet ualet viii libras. IN AIHORDE HVNDREDO. Xpse archiepiscopus tenet HOLINGEBORDE. Pro vi solins se defendit. Terra est 20 xxuii carucarum. In dominio sunt n“. Et lxi uillanus cum xvi bordariis habent xxin carucas. Ibi fecclesia. Et xu serui. Et n molendina. Et vm acne prati. Silua xl porcorum. Inter totum: T.R.E., et post, ualebat xx libras. Et modo, ualet xxx libras. Huic Manerio adiacet dimidius solin, quidem nunquam reddidit scot. Hunc tenet episcopus baiocensis de archiepiscopo ad gablum. IN TOLLENTREV HVNDREDO. 25 Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Mepeham. Pro x solins se defendebat T.R.E. modo, pro vn. Terra est xxx carucarum. In dominio sunt mi. Et xxv uillani cum i,xxi bordariis habent xxv carucas. Ibi fecclesia. Et xvn serui. Et xvi acrte prati. Silua x porcorum. In totis ualentiis: T.R.E. ualebat xv libras et x solidos. Quando recepit, xv libras. Modo, xxvi libras. Ricardus de Tonebrige habet 30 in sua leuga quod ualet xvm solidos et vi denarios. Siluam xx porcorum. 40 Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Ferlaga. IN MEDESTAN HVNDREDO. Pro vi solins se defendit. Terra est xxvi carucarum. In dominio sunt mi. Et xxx 1 " v uillani cum lvi bordariis habent xxx carucas. Ibi fecclesia. Et m molendina de xxvii solidis et viii denariis. Ibi vm serui. Et vi piscarie de mille cc anguillis. Ibi xn acrte prati. Silua cxv porcorum. De terra huius Manerii tenet Godefridus in feuo dimidium solin. Et ibi habet ii carucas. Et vii uillanos cum x bordariis habentes hi carucas. Et mi seruos. Et i molendinum de xx denariis. Et mi acras prati. Et Siluam xxx porcorum. Totum Manerium, T.R.E. ualebat xvi libras. Et post, tantundem. Et modo, xxii libras. Quod abel modo tenet, vi libras. Quod Godefridus, ix libras. Quod Ricardus in sua leuga, nn libras. IN ESSAMELS HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Clive. Pro hi solins et dimidio se defendit. Terra est vi carucarum. In dominio est una caruca et dimidia. Et xx uillani cum xvm bordariis habent v carucas et dimidiam. Ibi fecclesia. Et n serui. Et xxxvi acrte prati. Silua de xn denariis. T.R.E. ualebat totum Manerium vi libras. Et post, vn libras. IN BOROWART LEST. IN TANET HVNDREDO. mocl ° ™ llbl ’ aS ' Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Monocstvne. T.R.E. pro xx solins se defendebat. Et modo, pro xvm. Terra est xxxi carucarum. In dominio sunt nn. Et quater xx fi et rx uillani cum xxi bordariis habent xxvii carucas. Ibi ii tecclesife. Et unum molendinum de x solidis. Ibi noua piscaria. Et una CHENTH. salina de xv denariis. Silua x porcorum. In totis ualentiis: ualebat, T.R.E., et post, xx libras. Et modo, xl libras. .pse archiepiscopus tenet Gecham. IN DVNEHAMFORT HVNDREDO Pro irn solins se defendit. Terra est xii carucarum. In dominio sunt m. Et xxix uillani, cum lx cotariis, habent xvi Caracas et dimidiam. Ibi eecclesia. Et irn molendina de c solidis. Et xxxv acree pratL Et Silua xxx porcorum. Totum Manerium ualebat: T.R.E., et post, xxii libras. Modo, xxxu libras. De terra hums Manerii tenet Willelmus homo suus tantum quod ualet vn libras. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet NORDEVDE. IN CANTVARIE IIVNDREDO. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio i caruca et dimidia. Et vn uillani cum xxvi bordariis habent n Caracas. Iluic Manerio pertinent in ciuitate cantuaria c burgenses m minus, reddentes viii libras et nn sohdos. Ibi vm molendina de lxxi solidis. Et xxim acree prati. Silua xxx porcorum. Inter totum ualet, et ualuit xvn libras. In eodem BOROWART LEST iacet paruum burgum nomine Seseltre, quod proprie pertinet coquinee archiepiscopi. Quidam nomine Blize tenet de monachis. In dominio est una caruca. Et xlviii cum gablo bordarii cum i caruca. Ibi eecclesia. Et vm piscariee de xxv solidis. Silua x porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xxv solidos. IN WIWARLET LEST. IN FAVRESHANT HVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Prestetone. Pro uno sohn se defendit. Terra est vi carucarum. In dominio sunt m. Et xm uillani cum xnn bordariis habent iii Caracas. Ibi eecclesia. Et i seruus. Et i molendinum sine censu. Et una piscaria de ccl anguillis. Ibi n acree prati. Silua v porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit x libras. Modo, xv libras. IN FELEBERG IIVNDREDO. Pro iiii solins se defendit. Terra est xim carucarum. In dominio sunt n®. Et lx uillani, cum xv cotariis, habent xv Caracas et dimidiam. Ibi eecclesia. Et i seruus. Et v molendina et dimidium de lxx solidis. Et xxx acree prati. Et silua xxv porcorum. T.R.E., et quando recepit, ualuit xii libras, Modo, xxv libras. Et tamen reddit xxx libras. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Godmersham. Pro vm solins se defendit. Terra est xii carucarum. In dominio sunt n®. Et lx uillani, cum vm cotariis, habent xvii Caracas. Ibi eecclesia. Et n serai. Et i molendinum de xxv solidis. Et xii acree prati. Silua xl porcorum. T.R.E., et quando recepit, ualuit xii libras. Modo, xx libras. Et tamen reddit xxx libras. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Certh. Pro m solins IN CERT IIVNDREDO. se defendit. Terra est xn carucarum. In dominio sunt n®. Et xxxvi uillani, cum xi cotariis, habent xxn Caracas et dimidiam. Ibi v serai. Et n molendina de vi solidis. Et salina de vi denariis. Et xxvn acree prati. Et Silua c porcorum. T.R.E., et quando recepit, ualuit xii libras. Modo, xx libras. Et tamen reddit Ipse archiepiscopus tenet. IN CALEHELLE HVNDREDO. ^fxxvn libras. Litelcert. T.R.E. se defendebat pro iii solins. Et modo, pro n liidis et dimidia. Terra est In dominio sunt n®. Et xix uillani cum v bordariis habent vn carucas. Ibi it molendina de v solidis et x denariis. Et xi acree prati. Et silua xv porcorum. De terra hujus Manerii tenet Willelmus, de archiepiscopo, dimidium solin, et ibi habet in dominio i carucam, cum nn seruis. Et x acras prati. Et siluam xx porcorum. Totum Manerium ualebat, T.R.E., et post, c solidos. Modo, viii libras et vm solidos et nn denarios. Quod Willelmus tenet, appreciatur xl solidis. CHENTH. 19 Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Welle. T.R.E. se defendebat pro vn solins. Et modo, pro v. Terra est xvm carucarnm. In dominio sunt mi. Et quater xx° et unus uillanus cum v bordariis habent xji Caracas et dimidiam. Ibi vn serai. Et unum molendinum de xxx denariis. Et xx acrse prati. Silua quater xx porcorum. s T.R.E. ualebat xvn libras et xi solidos et rai denaiios. Quando recepit, tantundem. Modo, xxmi libras et mi denarios. Et tamen reddit xl libras. IN LEST DE ESTKEIA. IN ESTREI IIVNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Estrei. Pro vn solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt m caructc. Et Lxxn uillani 10 cum xxii bordariis habent xxmi Caracas. Ibi I molinus et dimidi us de xxx solidis. Et m salinas de mi solidis. Et xvm acrae prati. Silua x porcorum. Et in Getinge tenent monachi cantuarienses dimidium solin, et unum iugum, et v acras. Et ibi habent vi uillanos cum ii carucis et dimidia. 15 Inter totum: T.R.E., et post, ualebat xxvi libras et x solidos et mi denaiios et i ferding. Modo, xxxvi libras et x solidos et mi denarios et i ferding. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet EDESHAM. Pro xvu solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio ii carucse sunt et dimidia. Et c uillani cum 20 xrm bordariis habent xxxvi Caracas. Ibi xm acrse prati. Et m serai. Silua ad clausuram. De terra huius Manerii tenent ii milites de archiepiscopo m solins. Et ibi habent in dominio nn carucas. Et xvm uillani cum v bordariis habent i carucam. Totum Manerium, T.R.E. ualebat xl libras. Quando recepit, similiter. 25 Modo, reddit xlvi libras et xxvi solidos et mi denarios. Et archiepiscopo c solidos de Garsumnne. Quod milites tenent ualet xi libras. Et tamen reddunt xm libras. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Weraiiorne. IN HAME IiVNDREDO. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. In dominio est I caruca. 30 Et vi uillani cum hi bordariis habent i carucam. Ibi xii acrse prati. Et silua vi porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualebat xx solidos. Et modo, lx solidos. IN LIMOWART LEST. IN BLACHEBORNE HYNDREDO. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Apeldres. T.R.E. se defendebat pro ii solins. Et modo, pro uno. Terra est vm carucarum. In dominio sunt m caruca:. Et xxxvn 35 uillani cum xli bordariis habent xi carucas. Ibi tccclesia. Et vi piscarise de in solidis et mi denariis. Ibi n acras prati. Et silua vi porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualebat vi libras. Modo, xvi libras et xvii solidos. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet IN HYNDEEDO DE WI. VI denanos ' unum Manerium quod se defendebat pro uno solin. T.R.E., et modo, pro dimidio. -to Terra ii carucarum. In dominio est una. Et m uillani cum mi bordariis habent ii cai-ucas et dimidiam. Ibi ascclesia. Et i molinus de n solidis. Et n serui. Et vii acrse prati. Silua x porcorum. T.R.E., et post, l solidos. modo nn libras. Ipse archiepiscopus tenet Asmeslant. IN MARESCO DE ROMENEL. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est m carucarum. Ibi sunt xxi uillanus 45 habentes vn carucas. Valet et ualuit semper mi solidos. De hac terra habet Willelmus folet i iugum. Et ualet ei per annum x solidos. Sandwic, suprascriptum est, pertinet ad dominium monachorum. 20 CHENTEL HIT. TERRA EPISCOPI ROVECESTRE. E piscopus Rofensis tenet Svdfleta. Pro vi solins se clefendit. Terra est xm carucarum. In dominio est una caruca. cum ix bordariis habentes xn Caracas. Ibi vn serai. Et xx acree Silua x porcorum. Modo se defendit pro v solins. Ibi est eecclesia. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xi libras. Modo, xxi libras. Et tamen reddit xxiiii libras, et unciam auri. ^fappreciatur xx solidis. De isto Manerio est in Tonebrige tantum de silva et de terra quod Et xxv uillani prati. Isdem episcopus tenet Estanes. T.R.E. se defendebat pro vi solins. Et modo, 10 pro iiii solins. Terra est xi carucarum. In dominio sunt II®. Et xx uillani ta cum xii bordariis habcnt xi carucas. Ibi eecclesia. Et mi serai. Et lxxii”’ aerie prati. Et unum molendinum de vi solidis et vm denariis. Et raia piscaria de m solidis et iiii denariis. Silua lx porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualebat xm libras. Et modo, xvi libras. Et tamen reddit xx libras, is et unam unciam auri, et unum Marsum. Ricardus de Tonebrige tenet de isto Manerio tantum siluee quod ualet xv solidos. Isdem episcopus tenet Fachesham. Pro ii solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et xv uillani cum m bordariis habent iiii carucas. Ibi eecclesia. Et hi serui. Et n molini de xv 20 solidis. Et mi acne prati. Silua xxx porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ua¬ lebat vii libras. Modo, vm libras. -j- presbyter JLsdem episcopus tenet Langafel, et Anschitillus de eo. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et ix uillani cum vii bordariis habent n carucas. Valuit lxx solidos. Et modo, c solidos. 25 Isdem episcopus tenet Bhonlei. Pro vi IN BRONLEI IiVNDREDO. solins se defendebat. T.R.E. Et modo, pro tribus. Terra est xm carucarum. In dominio sunt n“ carucie. Et xxx uillani cum xxvi bordariis habent xi carucas. Ibi i molendinum de iiii solidis. Et n aerie prati. Silua c porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xn libras et x solidos. Modo, xvm so libras. Et tamen reddit xxi libras n 03 solidos minus. Isdem episcopus tenet Oldeiiam. Pro vi solins se defendebat. T.R.E. Et modo, pro tribus. Terra est v carucarum. In dominio sunt 11“ Et xvm uillani cum xvi bordai’iis habent vi Caracas. Ibi vi serui. Et 1 piscaria. Et lx aerie prati. Silua xx porcorum. Ibi eecclesia. T.R.E., et post, 35 ualuit vm libras. Modo, xn libras. Isdem episcopus tenet Mellingetes. Pro m solins se defendebat T.R.E. Et modo, pro uno et dimidio. Terra est in carucarum. In dominio est una. Et v uillani cum vi bordariis habent n carucas. Ibi eecclesia. Et unum molendinum de n solidis. Silua xx porcorum. T.R.E., et post, 40 ualuit xl solidos. Et modo, im libras. Isdem episcopus tenet Totesclive. T.R.E. pro m solins se defendebat. Et modo, pro imo solin. Terra est in carucarum. In dominio est unum solin. Et una caruca ibi. Et x uillani cum n carucis. Ibi eecclesia. Et 1 seruus. Et n 05 acrai prati. Et Silua x porcorum. T.R.E., et post, 45 ualuit lx solidos. Et modo, vii libras. Isdem episcopus tenet Esnoilakd. T.E.E. se defendebat pro vi solins. Et modo, pro m bn9 . Terra est vi carucarum. In dominio sunt n carucee. Et x uillani cum vi bordariis habent vi carucas. Ibi eecclesia. Et v serui. Et hi molendini de xl solidis. Et xxx acne prati. Silua mi porcorum. 50 T.R.E., et post, ualebat vi libras, modo, ix libras. CIIENTH. 21 Isdem episcopus tenet Coclestane. IN ESSAMELE HYNDREDO. Pro ii solins et dimidio se defendebat T.R.E. Et modo, pro n bus tantum. Terra est vi carucarum. In dominio sunt n‘ c . Et xv uillani cum ix bordariis habent v carucas. Ibi ecclesia. Et ii send. Et i molinus de xxx denariis. Et xx aerie prati. 5 T.R.E., et post, ualebat hit libras et x solidos. Et modo, x libras et x solidos. Isdem episcopus tenet DAOTTONE. Pro n solins se defendebat T.R.E. Et modo, pro dimidio solin. Terra est n carucarum. In dominio est una. Et vi uillani habent ibi i carucam. Ibi ecclesia. Et nri serai. Et mi acre prati. Silua xv porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualebat c solidos. Et modo, vn libras et xv solidos. 10 Isdem episcopus tenet Hallenges. T.R.E. se defendebat pro vi solins. Et modo, pro n bua et dimidio. Terra est vn carucaram. In dominio sunt m caruce. Et xv uillani cum ix bordariis habent vi carucas. Ibi ecclesia. Et ii serai. Et xxx‘“ acre prati. ^fualdt vn solidos. Et silua v porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualebat vn libras. Modo, xvi libras. Quod Ricardus tenet in sua leuua is Isdem episcopus tenet Frandesberie. Pro x solins se defendebat T.R.E. Et modo, pro vn. Terra est xv carucarum. In dominio sunt v caracse. Et xl uillani cum xxvin bordariis habent xi carucas. Ibi ecclesia. Et ix serai. Et unus molinus de xn solidis. Et xl acre prati. Silua v porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualebat vrn libras. Et modo, xxv libras. Quod Ricardus tenet in sua leuua ualet x solidos. 20 Isdem episcopus tenet Borchetelle. IN HYNDREDO DE ROVECESTRE. T.R.E. pro ii solins se defendebat. Et modo, pro uno solin et dimidio. Terra est mi carucarum. In dominio sunt ii“ caruce. Et vi uillani cum m caracis. Ibi l acre prati. Et ii molini de xx‘‘ solidis. T.R.E., et post, ualebat vi libras. Et modo, x libras. 25 In Rovecestre habuit episcopus, et habet adhuc, quater xx li mansuras terre, que pertinent ad Frandesberie et Borestele, propria eius maneria. T.R.E., et post, ualebant m libras, modo, ualent vm libras. Et tamen per annum reddunt xi libras et xin solidos et ini denarios. Isdem episcopus tenet ESTOCIIES. T.R.E. se defendebat IN HOW HVNDREDO. so pro v solins. Et modo, pro tribus. Terra est v carucarum. In dominio sunt n caruce. Et x uillani cum v bordariis habent mi carucas. Ibi ecclesia. Et mi or serui. Et mi acre prati. T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet vm libras et xx li denarios. Et tamen reddit qui tenet xni libras et xx denarios. Hoc Manerium fuit, et est, de episcopatu rofensi; sed Goduinus 35 comes, T.R.E. emit illud de duobus hominibus qui eum tenebant de episcopo, et, eo ignorante, facta est hec uenditio. Postmodum, uero, regnante W. rege, diratiocinavit illud Lanfrancus archiepiscopus contra baiocensem episcopum; et inde est modo saisita rofensis ecclesia. 22 CHENTIL TERRA EPISCOPI BAIOCENSIS. IN LEST DE SVDTONE. IN ACHESTAN HVNDREDO. D e episcopo Baiocensi tenet Hugo de Forth Hagelei. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n Caracas. Et xini uillani cum hi bordariis habent nn carucas. Ibi m serai. Et xn acne prati. Et unum molendinum de xx solidis. Et una dena silva de v porcis. Totum Manerium ualet modo xv libras de xx*‘ in ora. In hoc Manerio tenet unus homo xx t! acras terras ualentes per annum v solidos, Vluret uocatur, nec pertinet ad ilium Manerium, neque potuit habere dominum prater regem. 10 Helto tenet SviNESCAMP de episcopo. Pro x solins se defendit. Terra est xmi carucanun. In dominio sunt in. Et xxxm uillani cum hi bordariis habent xni carucas. Ibi unus miles. Et x serui. Et xl acne prati. Silua m porcoram. Et v piscaria de xxx denariis. Et vi 1 ® que seruit ad hallam. Et una Heda de v solidis et im denariis. De silua huius Manerii tenet 15 Ricardus in sua leuua quod ualet im solidos. Totum Manerium ualebat xx libras. Et modo, ualet xxxii libras. JAadulfus filius Turaldi tenet de episcopo Erclei. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n“ caruca. Et ix uillani, cum vi cotariis, habent in Caracas. Ibi in send. Et silua x porcorum. 20 Totum Manerium ualebat hi libras. Et modo, c solidos. Quadam mulier tenuit. Hadulfus tenet de episcopo Eddintone. Pro dimidio solin. Terra est i caruca. Et ibi est, cum nn bordariis, et n serais. Et ibi i molin de xxin solidis. Totum Manerium appreciatur nil libris. T.R.E. parum ualebat. Lestan tenuit de rege E. Et, post mortem eius uertit se ad cilt 25 Alnod. Et modo est in calumpnia. -A-nsgotus de Rouecestre tenet de episcopo, Mapledescam. Pro di¬ midio solin. Terra est In dominio est i caraca. cum uno uillano et nn bordariis, et nn serais. Ibi una acra prati. Et silua vm porcorum, et xvi denariorum plus. Valuit nn libras. Et modo, cx solidos. 30 Eustan tenuit de rege E. •Adam filius ILuberti tenet de episcopo Redlege. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dommio sunt n caruca. Et vi uillani cum v bordariis habent n carucas. Ibi v serui. Et dimidia acra prati. Et una dena silua Manerium quam tenet Ricardus de Tonebrige. Valuit A in libras. Et modo, nn libras 35 et x solidos. Siuuard tenuit de rege E. Hugo de Port tenet de episcopo Eisse. Pro tribus solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et xn uillani cum vm bordariis habent in carucas. Ibi quidam miles habens vm inter seraos et ancillas. Et terram ad unam caracam. Prater hoc, habet Hugo duos homines tenentes 40 dimidium solin, qui poterant T.R.E. ire quolibet sine licentia. Vna terra vocatur Didele, et alia Soninges. Terra est ibi ad unam caracam. Et appreciatur xx solidis. Totum Manerium appreciabatur vn libris. Et modo, similiter. Quod Ricardus tenet de Tonebrige xl solidis appreciatur. Rex habet inde n " 8 denas qua appreciantur vm solidis. Godric tenuit 45 de rege E. vJToisfridus de Ros tenet Lolingestone. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et mi uillani, cum uno cotario, habent n carucas. Ibi vn serui. Et vi acra pastura. Silua xx porcorum. Quando recepit, ualebat lx solidos. Et modo, c solidos. Rex habet in manu sua so quod ualet x solidos. Brixe cilt tenuit de rege E. CHENTII. De episcopo tenet Malgerius LOLINGESTONE. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una earuca. Et in uillani cum vi bordariis habent i carucam. Ibi v aerie prati. Totum Manerium ualebat lx solidos. modo, lxx solidos. De isto Manerio habet 5 Hex quod ualet x solidos. Bruning tenuit de rege E. Xsdem Malgerius tenet in Ferlingeham dimidium iugum terra;. Terra est in bourn. Ibi sunt n boues, cum uno bordario. Et ii acne prati. \ aluit et ualet xv solidos. Brunesune tenuit, et potuit cum terra sua uertere se quo uoluit. De hoc Manerio tenet rex 10 quod ualet vin solidos. Isdem Malgerius tenet in PlNNEDENE dimidium solin de episcopo. Terra est vii bourn. Ibi est una caruca, cum vi uillanis. Et vi acne prati. \ aluit et ualet xvi solidos. Aluret tenuit T.R.E., et potuit se uertere quo voluit. 15 Osbernus pastforeire tenet in Lolingeston dimidium solin de episcopo. Terra est In dominio est i caruca. Et in uillani cum i bordario, et i serao, habent i carucam. Ibi v acne prati. Silua v porcorum. Et unus molinus de xv solidis, et cl anguillis. Ilex habet siluam pro novo dono episcopi, et ualet in solidos. Totum Manerium ualebat lx solidos. Modo, 20 lxxvii solidos. Seuuart sot tenuit T.R.E, et potuit se uertere cum terra sua quo uoluit. "Wadardus tenet de episcopo dimidium solin in FERNINGEHAM. Terra est m carucarum. In dominio sunt ii® earucae. cum uno uillano, et ii cotariis, et v seruis. Ibi dimidium molendinum de v solins. Et mi acne prati. Silua v porcorum. Excepto isto dimidio solin tenet Wadardus dimidium iugum in eadem villa quod nunquam se quietauit apud regem. Inter totum: ualuit mi libras. Et modo, vi libras. Estan tenuit T.R.E. et potuit se uertere quo uoluit. Xsdem Wadardus tenet de episcopo Maplescamp. Pro dimidio solin se 30 defendit. Terra est ii carucarum. Ibi sunt, cum i uillano et mi bordariis, et v seruis. Et una acra et dimidia prati. Silua vm porcorum, et xvi denariorum. Valuit in libras. Et modo, vi libras. Vltanus tenuit sub Heraldo. Ernulfus de Hesding tenet FERNINGEHAM. Pro m iugis se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. Ibi sunt modo vi boues, cum n uillanis 35 et m bordariis. Ibi unum molendinum de x solidis. Et vm acra; prati. Pastura c ouibus. Silua x porcorum et xtttt denariorum. Rex habet de silua huius Manerii quod ualet vm solidos. Totum Manerium ualuit hi libras. Et modo, xl solidos. Dering tenuit, et potuit se uertere quo uoluit. Amschitillus de ros tenet TARENT de episcopo. Pro dimidio solin 40 se defendit. Terra est I caruca; et dimidia;. In dominio est una. Et mi uillani cum mi bordariis habent i carucam. Ibi iii acra; prati. Et ii molini de xviii solidis. Silua hi porcorum. Rex habet de isto Manerio, pro nouo dono episcopi, quod ualet x denarios. Totum Manerium ualuit et ualet c solidos. Aluric tenuit de rege E. 45 In eadem uilla habet isdem A i manerium de episcopo. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est i caruca; et dimidiie. Ibi v uillani et v bordarii. Et unum molendinum de xx solidis. Ibi iii acne prati. Et i seruus. Totum Manerium ualuit lx solidos. Et modo, t.xx solidos. Osiert tenuit de rege E. so Isdem Anschitillus tenet de episcopo Hortune. Pro uno solin se ^fdefendit. CHENTH. Terra est m carucarum. Et ibi sunt mi bordarii. Et unum molendinum de v solidis. Et vi acras prati. Ibi mcclesia est. Et silua m porcorum. Rex habet pro nouo dono episcopi tantum silute de isto Manerio quod ualet v solidos. Totum Manerium ualuit mi libras. Et modo, vi libras. Godel de Brixi tenuit, 5 et potuit se uertere cum hac terra quo uoluit. Xsdem Anscliitillus tenet de episcopo in eodem Manerio dimidium solin. Terra est unius carucee. Et ibi est in dominio. Et vm uillani cum vi bordariis liabent i carucam. Ibi i molinus de xv solidis. Et ix acne prati. Silua v porcorum. solidos. Totum Manerium ualuit xl solidos. Et modo, lx a Ording tenuit de rege. 10 Xsdem Anscliitillus tenet de episcopo in eodem Manerio unum solin. Terra est m carucarum. In dominio est una caruca. Et vm uillani cum n carucis. Ibi unus seruus. Et viri acne prati. Et dimidium molendinum de v solidis. Silua xv porcorum. Totum Manerium ualuit nn libras. Et modo, c solidos. Aluuardus tenuit de heraldo. Hsec mi” maneria is sunt modo pro uno Manerio. LITELAI IIVNDHEDO. XXobertus Latinn tenet de episcopo LoiSNES. Terra est xvii carucarum. In dominio est una. Et lx uillani cum m bordariis habent xv carucas. Ibi ii serui. Et in cotarii. Et in piscarim de nn solidis. Et xxx acne prati. Silua xx porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat xc libras. 20 Quando episeopus recepit, xvni libras. Et modo, xxn libras. Et tamen qui tenet reddit xxx libras. Hoc Manerium se defendebat T.R.E. pro x solins. Et modo, pro nn solins. Azor tenuit. _A_nsgotus tenet de episcopo Hov, quod se defendit pro uno solin. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et v uillani cum i caruca 25 et dimidia. Et unum molendinum de x solidis. Ibi n cotarii. Et unus seruus. Et xn acrm prati. Silua m porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Quando recepit, tantundem. Et modo, nn libras. Anschil de rege E. tenuit. Abb as Sancti Augustini tenet de episcopo baiocensi Plumestede. Pro n solins et uno iugo se defendit. Terra v carucarum. In dominio est 30 una caruca. Et xvii uillani cum in bordariis habent nn carucas. Ibi silua v porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Quando recepit, vm libras. Et modo, tantundem. Et tamen qui tenet reddit xn libras. Brixi cilt tenuit de l-ego E. IN HELMESTKEI HVNDREDO. Mm gerius tenet de episcopo Rochelei. Pro uno solin se defendit. 35 Terra est In dominio est una caruca et dimidia. Et x uillani cum x bordariis habent n carucas et dimidiam. Ibi I molinus de xn solidis. Silua hi porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat mi libras. Quando recepit, in libras. Et modo, c solidos. Aluuard tenuit de rege E. Ernulfus de hesding tenet de episcopo ClRESFEL. 'io Pro ii solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n caructe. Et xx uillani cum nn bordariis habent vm carucas. Ibi mi serui. Et unus molinus de x solidis. Et x acne prati. Et silua x porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat xvi libras. Et post, xn libras. Et modo, xxv libras. Et tamen qui tenet reddit xxxv libras. Tochi tenuit de rege E. io Adam filius huberti tenet de episcopo SUDORAL Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n carucee. Et xun uillani cum i bordario habent im carucas. Ibi vi serui. Et x acne prati. Silua x porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat vi libras. Et post, nn libras. Et modo, x libras. Toli tenuit de rege E. 50 Isdem Adam tenet de episcopo WlCHEHAM. Pro uno solin se defendit. CIIENTIL 2 Terra est In dominio sunt n caracce. Et xxim uillani habent mi carucas. Ibi xm serai, Et una iccclesia. Et unus molinus de xx denariis. Et una silua de x porcis. T.R.E. ualebat vni libras. Et post, vi libras. Et modo, xm libras, filius carle Godric tenuit de rege E. 5 Groisfridus de ros tenet de episcopo Lasela. Pro yn solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt hi Caracas. Et xxxi uillanus cum xrin bordariis habent xvi carucas. Ibi x serai. Et una piscaria de qua ter xx (i anguillis, et x. Silua lxxv porcorum. Totum Manerium ualebat T.R.E. xxx libras. Quando recepit, xvi libras. Et modo, xxim libras, quod Goisfridus tenet. Ricardus de Tone- 10 brige quod tenet in leuua sua, appreciatur vi libris. Quod rex tenet de hoc manerio, xxn solidis. Brixi cilt tenuit de rege E. .Ajischitil de ros tenet de episcopo Craie. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est I caraca. Et vn uillani cum vi bordariis habent unam carucam. Ibi mcclesia. Et una acra prati. Et rri acrae pastura. T.R.E., et post, ualebat mi libras. Et modo m libras. Leuric tenuit de rege E. Xsdem Anschitillus tenet de episcopo aliam Craie. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caraca. Et vn uillani cum v bordariis habent i carucam. Ibi i molinus de xlii denariis. Et v serai. Silua vn porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit mi libras. Et modo, hi libras. ^fde Alnod cilt. 20 Hae duee terra fuerunt ii Maneria T.ll.E. Et modo sunt in uno Manerio. Aluuinus tenuit IN DIMIDIO LEST DE SVDTONE. IN GRENYIZ HVNDREDO. Episcopus Lisiacencis tenet de episcopo baiocensi, Grenviz. Pro ii solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt ii caracte. Et xxim uillani habent mi carucas. Et mi bordarii. Et i cotarius. Et v serai. Ibi mi molendina de lxx solidis. 25 Et xxit aerie prati. Et xl acra pastura. Et Silua x porcorum. comes Hi ii solins. T.R.E. fuerunt n Maneria. Unum tenuit Ileroldus; et alium simul Brixi. Et modo sunt in uno. T.R.E., et post, A ualebant viii libras. Et modo, appreciantur xii libris. uicecomes Haimo tenet de episcopo ALTEHAM. Pro uno solin et dimidio se defendit. Terra 30 est xii carucarum. In dominio sunt ii Caracas. Et xlii uillani cum xii bordariis habent xi carucas. Ibi ix serai. Et xxii acra prati. Silua l porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat xvi libras. Quando recepit, xii libras. Et modo, xx libras. Aluuoldus tenuit de rege. Filius Turaldi de Rouecestre tenet de episcopo WlTENEMERS. Pro uno 35 solin se defendit. Terra est rm carucarum. In dominio sunt n“ carucas. Et xi uillani, cum ii cotariis, habent n carucas. Ibi mi acra prati. Silua xv porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat c solidos. Quando recepit, mi libras. Et modo c solidos. Anscliil tenuit de rege E. "Walterius de Douuai tenet de episcopo Lee. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. 40 Terra est nn carucarum. In dominio sunt n carucse. Et xi uillani, cum ii cotariis, habent ii Caracas. Ibi ii serai. Et v aerie prati. Silua x porcorum. ^"de rege. T.R.E., et quando episcopus recepit, ualebat m libras. Modo c solidos. Aluuinus tenuit Willelmus filius Ogerii tenet de episcopo Cerletone. Pro imo solin se defendit. Terra est v carucarum. In dominio est i caraca. Et xm uillani habent iii 45 carucas. Ibi H serai. Et vm acra prati. Silua v porcorum. T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet vn libras. Hanc terrain tenuerunt de rege ii fratres pro n b,ls maneriis. Goduin et Aluuard. Isdem Willelmus tenet de episcopo Crai. IN IIELMESTREI HVNDREDO. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caraca. 50 Et vm uillani cum i caraca et dimidia. Et mi cotarii. Et i molinus de x solidis. 20 CHENTH. Ibi unus seraus. Et silua vi porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat nn libras. Et post, hi libras. Modo, mi libras. Goduinus tenuit de rege E. Anschitillus tenet de episcopo Croctune. Pro uno solin et uno iugo se defendit. Terra est In dominio nichil est. sed in uillani et nn bordarii 5 ibi sunt. T.R.E., et post, ualebat c solidos. Et modo, vi libras. Aluuinus tenuit hanc terram de rege E. pro duobus Maneriis. Grislebertus maminot tenet de episcopo Codeham. Pro mi solins se defendit. Terra est x carucarum. In dominio sunt nn. Et xv uillani cum vi bordariis habent 10 vi carucas. Ibi ascclesia. Et xi serui. Et n molini de xrm solidis et n denariis. Silua xl porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat xx libras. Et post, xvi libras. Modo, xxim libras. Isdem Gislebertus tenet de episcopo Chestan. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est i caruca. Et im uillani cum i caruca. Ibi silva is v porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualebat lx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. Sberne biga tenuit de rege E. Hugo nepos herberti tenet de episcopo SENTLINGE. Pro uno solin et dimidio se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n carucas. Et xx uillani cum n carucis. Ibi lecclesia. Et ix serui. Et vi acne prati. Et xx aerie pastime. 20 Silua vin porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat vm libras. Et post, vi libras. Modo, vm libras. Bonde tenuit de archiepiscopo. Ansgotus de Rouecestre tenet de episcopo Baoheham. IN BRVNLEI IIVNDREDO. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est vm carucarum. In dominio sunt n. Et xxn uillani cum vm bordariis habent vm carucas et dimidiam. Ibi xii acne prati. 23 Et mi serui. Et uuum molendinum. Et silua lx porcorum. /fde rege E. T.R.E., et post, ualebat ix libras. Modo, xiii libras. Anschil tenuit IN LEST DE ELESFORD. IN LAYROCHESFEL IIVNDREDO. Adam tenet de episcopo Leleburne. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt m carucse. Et xvi uillani cum n bordariis 30 habent vii carucas. Ibi lecclesia. Et x serui. Et unus molinus de vh solidis. Et xii acrai prati. Silua l porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat vm libras. Quando recepit, vii libras. Modo, vm libras. Ricardus de Tonebrige tenet in sua leuua quod ualet xxnn solidos. Rex tenet, pro nouo dono episcopi, quod valet xxiiii solidos et ii denarios. Hoc Manerium tenuit 33 Turgis de Goduino comite. Anschitil tenet de episcopo ELENTUN. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est hi carucarum. In dominio sunt H. Et xv uillani cum ii bordariis habent i carucam et dimidiam. Ibi lecclesia. Et n serui. Et dimidius molinus. Et una dena de xv solidis. Silua vhi porcorum. Et una acra prati. 40 T.R.E. ualebat c solidos. Quando recepit, lx solidos. Modo, c solidos. Vluric tenuit de Alnod cilt. uicecomes Haimo tenet de episcopo DiCTVNE. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est iiii carucarum. In dominio sunt n re . Et xx uillani cum v bordariis habent m Caracas. Ibi lecclesia. Et vi serui. Et unus molinus de x solidis. Et vm acne prati. 45 Et xxxv acne pastune. Silua vi porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat vm libras. Quando recepit, c solidos. Modo, vm libras. Sbern tenuit de rege E. "Vitalis tenet de episcopo SiFLETONE. Pro m iugis se defendit. Terra est I caracie. In dominio i caruca et dimidia. Et vi uillani cum uno so bordario habent dimidiam carucam. Ibi vi serui. Et i molinus de x ^fsolidis. CHENTH. 27 Ibi x acrte prati, et xxx acres pasturee. T.RE. ualebat xl solidos. Quando recepit, nu libras. Modo, terrain c solidos. Hanc A tenuerunt T.RE. duo homines in para- gio. Leuuinus et Yluuinus; et potuerunt cum terra sua se uertere quo uoluerunt. Radulfus filius Turoldi tenet de episcopo Aiglessa. Pro hi iugis se defendit. Terra est In dominio est i caruca. Et vir uillani cum xim bordariis habent i carucam. Ibi i seruus. Et xr acrte prati. Silua x porcorum. T.RE., et post, ualebat rn libras. Modo, im libras. Ricardus quod tenet in sua leuua, xv denarios. Rex, vi solidos et v denarios, pro nouo dono episcopi. Et in Rouecestre habuit episcopus sua in domos de xxxi denariis, quas cepit de isto Manerio in A manu. Hoc Manerium tenuit Alnod cilt. -tlugo de port tenet de episcopo PELLESORDE. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est i caruca. Et unus uillanus cum inr bordariis habent m boues. Ibi tecclesia. Et n serai. Et v acrte prati. Et una acra pastime. T.R.E. ualebat xx solidos. Quando recepit, xxx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. Godric tenuit de rege E. Isdem Hugo tenet de episcopo RlESCE. Pro n solins et dimidio se defendit. Terra est v carucarum. In dominio sunt n®. Et x uillani cum n bordariis habent in Caracas. Ibi tecclesia. Et x serai. Et i molinus de x solidis. Et ix acrte prati. Silua v porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat vni libras. Quando recepit, c solidos. Modo, vr libras. Aluric tenuit de rege E. Isdem Hugo tenet de episcopo OFEHAM. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est in carucarum. In dominio nicliil. Ibi vi uillani cum i bordario habent n Caracas. Ibi i molinus de l denariis. Et in serai. Et nn acrte prati. Silua x porcorum. T.RE. ualebat xl solidos. Quando recepit, xx solidos. Modo, xxx solidos. Godric tenuit de rege E. Rannulfus de columbels tenet de episcopo Essedene. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et xix uillani cum hi bordariis habent in Caracas. Ibi in serui. Et vni acrte prati. T.RE. ualebat m libras. Quando recepit, nn libras, comes Modo, v libras. Leuuinus tenuit. Rotbertus latinus tenet ad firmam de rege Totintune, de nouo dono episcopi baiocensis. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est unius caruca; et dimidite. In dominio est una. Et iu ea uillani cum ix bordariis habent dimidiam carucam. Ibi nn serai. Et v acrte prati. Silua u porcorum. T.RE. ualebat xxx solidos. Quando recepit, xx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. Ylnod tenuit de rege E. Isdem Rotbertus tenet in Totintune, ad firmam de rege, i iugum ; et istud est de nouo dono episcopi baiocensis. Et ibi nil est nisi n m acrte prati. Valet et valuit semper x solidos. Goduinus tenuit de rege E. Radii If us filius Turaldi tenet de episcopo EDDINTUNE. Pro n solins et dimidio. se defendit A . Terra est v carucarum. In dominio sunt ii“. Et vi uillani cum ix bordariis habent i carucam. Ibi tecclesia. Et x serai. Et n molini de xi solidis et n denariis. Et xn acrte prati. Silua x porcorum. T.RE. ualebat vm libras. Quando recepit, c solidos. Modo, vi libras. Agelred tenuit de rege E. 8 GHENT!!. Hadulfus filius Turoldi tenet de episcopo IN TOLLENTREV IIVNDREDO. MELETVNE. Pro uno solin et m iugis se defendit. Terra est mi carucarum. In dominio est una. Et xxi uillanus cum n bordariis habent n carucas. Ibi tecclesia. Et i molinus de xlix denariis. Et heda de xx solidis. 5 Et hi serui. T.R.E. ualebat irn libras, et post, iii libras. Modo, yi libras. Ricardus quod tenet in sua leuua, v solidos in una silua. Xsdem Radulfns tenet de episcopo ^fLeuuinus comes tenuit. Leijesdvne. Pro n solins et dimidio et dimidio iugo se defendit. Terra est vi carucarum. In dominio sunt n®. Et xvn uillani cum nn bordariis 10 habent v carucas. Ibi eecclesia. Et i seraus. Et iii aerie prati et dimidia. Silua xx 1 ' porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat vi libras. Et post, c solidos. Modo, vm libras. Ricardus quod habet in sua leuua, xx denarios. Episcopus tenet in sua manu intra ciuitatem Rouecestre mi domos ad hoc Manerium pertinentes, de quibus habet ix solidos et x denarios. Pro n solins et uno iugo se defendit. Terra est nn carucarum. In dominio est una. Et mi uillani cum vm seruis habent n boues. Ibi mcclesia. Et i heda. T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Quando recepit, tantundem. Modo, xi libras. Hoc Manerium fuerat iii" Maneria. T.R.E. Leuric, et Vluuinus, 20 et Goduinus tenuerunt. Nunc est in unum. Wadardus tenet de episcopo Notestede. Pro u solins se defendit. Terra est ii carucarum. In dominio est una. Et ibi mi bordarii. Et mcclesi Et nn serui. Silua m porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat irn libras. Quando recepit, iii libras. Modo, v libras. Vlstan tenuit de rege E. 25 .Anschitillus tenet de episcopo Ofeiiam. IN LAVROCHESFEL IIVNDREDO. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est i caruca. Et vi uillani cum n bordariis habent i caracam. Ibi nn serui. Et i molinus de x solidis. Et vn acne prati. Silua x porcorum. Et in ciuitate Rouecestre i domus reddens xxx denarios. T.R.E. ualebat Manerium 30 c solidos. Quando recepit, nn libras. Modo, mi libras et ix solidos. Ricardus de Tonebrige quod tenet xi solidos ualet. Vluric tenuit de Alnod cilt. Radulfus de Curbespine tenet de episcopo Berlinge. Pro vi solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. 35 Et x uillani cum xnn bordariis habent vi carucas. Ibi axclesia. Et vi serui. Et i molinus de x solidis, et ccc et xxx anguillis. Et piscaria de lx anguillis. Ibi xn acr® prati. Et pastura l animalibus. Silua xl porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat xn libras. Quando recepit, vi libras. Modo xn libras. Sbern biga tenuit de rege E. 40 Xsdem Radulfus tenet de episcopo Boriiam. Pro vi solins se defendit. Terra est vm carucarum. In dominio sunt n. Et xv uillani cum xx bordariis habent vi carucas. Ibi ®cclesia. Et vn serui. Et i molinus de vi solidis. Et x acr® prati. Silua xx porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Et quando recepit, tantundem. Modo, xn libras. 45 Episcopus de Rouecestre habet domos de hoc Manerio; et ualent vn solidos. comes Hoc Manerium tenuit Leuuinus. IN LITEFELLE IIVNDREDO. Oorbinus tenet de episcopo Pecheham. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est vi carucarum. In dominio est una. Et xn uillani habent v carucas. Et vm bordarii. Et v serui. Et iii acrae prati. Silua x porcorum. T.R.E., 50 et post, ualebat xn libras. Modo, vm libras. Rex habet de hoc Manerio CHENTH. 29 comes tres denas, ubi manent mi uillani, et ualent xl solidos. Leuuinus tenuit. Hicardus de Tonebrige tenet de episcopo FIaslow. Pro vi solins se defendit. Terra est xii carucarum. In dominio sunt in. Et xlvii uillani cum xv bordariis habent xv carucas. Ibi secclesia. Et x serui. Et n molini de xr solidis. 5 Et xii piscariee de vn solidis et vi denariis. Et xii aerte prati. Silua lx porcorum. T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet xxx libras. Eddeua tenuit de rege E. filius Turoldi tenet de episcopo dimidium solin in EsTOCIHXGE- BEEGE. T.RE. tenuerunt n liberi homines. Et modo, similiter. Et ualet xx solidos. IN LEST DE ELESFORD. IX WACHELESTAN HVNDREDO. 10 Jtlicardus de Tonebrige tenet de episcopo Tivebele. Pro uno iugo se defendit. Terra est I carucas. Et ibi est in dominio. Et ascclesia. Et Silua n porcorum. Valet et ualuit semper xv solidos. Eddeua tenuit do rege. Hugo nepos Herberti tenet de episcopo IN AIFIORDE HVNDREDO. Haeiaedesham. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est vi carucarum. In dominio i 5 xvm uillani cum x bordariis habent nn carucas. Ibi ascclesia. Et xi serui. Et n molini de xi solidis et vi denariis. Et vii acne prati. Silua xv porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Quando recepit, vrn libras. Modo, x libras. Osuuardus tenuit de rege E. Isdem Hugo tenet de episcopo Feeebvene. Pro uno solin se defendit. 20 Terra est n carucarum. In dominio im uillani cum I caruca et dimidia. Et n molini de XL denariis. T.R.E. ualebat nn libras. Post, et modo, in libras. comite Aluuinus tenuit de Goduuino. Isdem Hugo tenet de episcopo i iugum liberie terras in Selesbvexe. Et ibi habet dimidiam carucam. cum i bordario. Et v seruis. Et una acra prati et dimidia. 25 Valet et ualuit semper xx solidos. Aluuinus tenuit de Goduino comite. Isdem Hugo, et Adeloldus camerarius, tenent de episcopo Feedenestede. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est m carucarum. In dominio in uillani habent vii boues. Ibi ascclesia. Et n acne prati et dimidia. Et silua n porcorum. Valet et ualuit semper xx solidos. Leuuinus tenuit de rege E. 30 Adel old tenet de episcopo Esledes. Pro in solins se defendit. Terra est xn carucarum. In dominio sunt n carucas. Et xxvm uillani cum vin bordariis habent vii carucas. Ibi ascclesia. Et xvm serui. Ibi n arpendi uineas. Et vin acne prati. Silua xx porcorum. Et v molini uillanorum. T.RE. ualebat xvi libras. Similiter, quando recepit. Modo, xx libras. comes as Et tamen reddit xxv libras. Leuuinus tenuit. De hoc Manerio habet abbas Sancti Augustini dimidium solin, quod ualet x solidos, pro excambio parchi episcopi baiocensis. Comes de Ow habet nn denas de isto Manerio, qua: ualent xx solidos. •10 se defendit. Terra est hi carucarum et dimidias. In dominio sunt n”. Et vn uillani cum v bordariis habent I carucam et dimidiam. Ibi ascclesia. Et nn serui. Et vi aerie prati. Et i molinus de nn solidis et n denariis. Silua x porcorum. T.RE., et post, ualuit ini libras. Modo, vn libras. Goduuinus et Aluuinus tenuerunt de rege E. pro u bl15 Maneriis. Isdem Ansgot tenet de episcopo STOCHINGEBEEGE. Pro n solins se defendit. is Terra est In dominio est i caruca. Et v uillani cum ix bordariis habent n carucas. Ibi ascclesia. Et n serui. Et i molinus de Lxmi denariis. Silua xv porcorum. T.RE., et post, ualuit nn libras. Modo, vi libras. Elueua tenuit de rege E. Hugo de Port tenet Alnoitone. Pro in solins se defendit. Terra est vin carucarum. In dominio sunt ii caruca;. Et xvm uillani cum vi bordariis habent 50 vi carucas. Ibi ascclesia. Et vm serui. Et n molini et dimidius de xvn ^fsolidis. CHENTH. Ibi v acrse prati. Silua XL porcorum. T.RE. ualebat ix libras. Et tantundem quando recepit. Modo, x libras. Et tamen reddit xn libras. Huic Manerio adiacent m mansiones terre in Ilouecestre, et reddunt v solidos per annum. Osuuardus tenuit de rege E. Adam filius Huberti tenet de episcopo SvdtONE. Pro mi solins se defendit. Terra est vii carucarum. In dominio sunt n ffi . Et xvm uillani cum v bordariis habent rra Caracas. Ibi ascclesia. Et mi acrtc prati. Et i molinus. Silua L porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat xii libras. Quando recepit, x libras. comes Modo, xim libras. Et tamen reddit xvm libras. Leuuinus tenuit. Isdem Adam tenet de episcopo Certh. Pro m solins se defendit. Terra est vm carucarum. In dominio est una. Et xx uillani cum v bordariis habent vi carucas. Ibi tecclesia. Et vm serai. Et vi aero prati. Silua l porcorum. Ibi m arpendi uineas. Et parcus siluaticarum bestiarum. cilt T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet xn libras. Alnod tenuit. Isdem Adam tenet de episcopo SUDTONE. Pro imo solin et dimidio se defendit. Terra est vm carucarum. In dominio sunt ii°\ Et xv uillani cum ix bordariis habent mi Caracas. Ibi eecclesia. Et x serai. Et vm acne prati. Silua l porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualebat x libras. de rege E. Modo, xn libras. Et tamen reddit xvm libras. Leuenot tenuit Isdem Adam tenet de episcopo Bogelei. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est n carucarum et dimidiae. In dominio est una caraca. Et n uillani cum n bordariis habent dimidiam carucam, Ibi accclesia. Et mi serui. Et i molinus de y solidis. Et vi acra prati. Silua xx porcorum. De isto Manerio habet unus homo Adam unum solin, et uoeatur Merlea. Et ibi habet i carucam. Et nn uillanos cum i caruca. Et mcclesiam. Et n seruos. Et siluam mi porcorum. /Turgis tenuit de rege E. Totum Manerium T.E.E. ualebat yi libras. Et post, tantundem. Modo, yn libras. Isdem Adam tenet de episcopo Laugvelei. Pro uno solin et dimidio se defendit. Terra est mi carucarum. In dominio sunt if. Et vn uillani enm v bordariis habent in carucas. Ibi accclesia. Et vn serui. Et m acne prati. Silua xxv porcorum. T.RE. ualebat lx solidos. Quando recepit, L solidos. Modo, ix solidos. Turgis tenuit de rege E. Isdem Adam tenet de episcopo Otbikgedene. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. In dominio est una. Et n niliani cum mi bordariis habent dimidiam carucam. Ibi n serui. Et nna acra prati. Silua v porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit x solidos. Modo, xxx solidos. Huic Manerio pertinent n mansure terra in cantuaria de xn denariis. Aluuardus tenuit de rege E. hoc Manerium. Isdem Adam tenet de episcopo Est Serve. p r0 dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est i carncse. Et ibi est in dominio. cum uno uillano et uno bordario. Et v seruis. Ibi nn acra prati. Silua nn porcomm. T.R.E., et post, et modo, nalet xx solidos. Godric tenuit "Willelmus filius Roberti tenet de episcopo ^ West Selve. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est in carucarum et dimidim. In dominio snnt if. Et quidam Prancigena, cum x nillanis et i bordario habent i carucam ot dimidiam. Ibi v serui. Et r acra prati. Et unus molinus de XV denariis. Silua xv porcomm. T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet nn libras. Ecldid tenuit de rege E. Huic Manerio pertinebat in cantuaria, T.R.E., una domus reddens xxv denarios. CHENTH. 31 Hugo nepos Herberti tenet tie episcopo Boltone. Pro uno solin se defenclit. Terra est n carucarum. In dominio nichil. sed v uillani habent i carucam ibi. Et n acras prati. Silua xx porcorum. Ibi ascclesia. T.R.E., et post, ualebat vnr libras. Modo, vi libras eomite 5 Aluuinus tenuit de Goduino. Xsdem Hugo tenet de episcopo Godeselle. Pro nno solin se defendit. Terra est rr carucarum. In dominio est una. Et v uillani habent i carucam et dimidiam. Ibi tecclesia. Et n serui. Et n acras prati. Et silua x porcorum. T.E.E., et post, et modo, ualet mi libras. Eduuinus tenuit 10 de rege E.; et potuit ire cum terra sua quo uoluit. Isdem Hugo tenet de episcopo WlNCHELESMERE. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est i carucse. Et ibi est in dominio. cum m serais. Et secclesia. Et silua v porcorum. Et, T.R.E., in can- tuaria iii domus pertinebant huic manerio, reddentes xx denarios. is Totum: T.R.E. ualebat c solidos. Et post, et modo, xl solidos. Vluiet tenuit de rege E.; et potuit ire quo libuit. Isdem Hugo tenet de episcopo Estselve. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est i caracee. Et ibi est in dominio. cum i uilla.no et uno bordario. Et n serais. Ibi mi acne prati. Et silua mi porcorum. 20 T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet xl solidos. Vluiet tenuit de rege E. (jToisfridus de Bos tenet de episcopo OTEHAM. Pro uno solin et uno iugo se defendit. Terra est ii carucarum et dimidige. In dominio est una. Et ix uillani cum iii bordariis habent i caracam. Ibi lecclesia. Et n serui. Et i molinus de v solidis. Et iii acras prati. Silua viu porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat irn libras. Quando 23 recepit, m libras. Modo, mi libras. Aluuinus tenuit de rege E. Hotbertus Latinus tenet ad firmam Herbretitov. Adeloldus tenuit de episcopo. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et ii uillani cum I bordario habent ii animalia. Et ibi mi acras et modo, prati. T.R.E., et post, A ualet lx solidos. Et tamen est ad firmam pro mi libris. comite 30 Aluricus tenuit de Goduino. Isdem Rotbertus tenet ad firmam Brunfelle. Adeloldus tenuit de episcopo. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt 11“ carucos. Et v uillani cum x bordariis habent i carucam et dimidiam. Ibi i molinus de vi solidis et vm denariis. Et pastura de xv solidis. Ibi xii serui. Et viii acras 33 prati. Silua xx porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit mi libras. Modo, c solidos. comite Aluuinus tenuit de Goduino. Huic Manerio pertinet qiuedam libera terra ad iii boues, et ualet v solidos. Hadulfus curbespine tenet de episcopo TURNEHAM. Pro ill solins se defendit. Terra est vm carucarum. In dominio est una. Et xvi uillani cum xvm 40 bordariis habent irn Caracas. Ibi lecclesia. Et vi serui. Et i molinus de vi solidis. Et mi acras prati. Silua xl porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualebat x libras. Modo, xn libras. Et tamen reddit xmi. Sbern biga tenuit de rege E. Isdem Radulfus tenet de episcopo FEREBVRNE. Pro uno solin se defendit. 45 Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et n uillani cum i bordario. Et ii serai. Et una acra prati et dimidia. Silua vi porcorum. T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet xxx solidos. Sbern biga tenuit de rege E. Otlo tenet de episcopo GeLXNGEHAM. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est I Caracas. In dominio sunt n"’. Et vi bordarii habent dimidiam carucam. so Ibi i molinus de xvi solidis et vii denariis. Et xm acras prati. Et vm acree ^fpasturge. OHENTII. T.R.E. ualebat xl solidos. Quando recepit, xxx solidos Modo, lx solidos. Rotbertus Latinus tenet ad firmam de episcopo IN C'ETEHAM IIVNDREDO. Ceteham. Pro yi solins se defendit. Terra est xvi carucarum. In dominio sunt iii. Et xxxm uillani cum nil bordariis liabent x carucas. Ibi tecclesia. Et xv serai Et i motions de xxxn denariis. Et xx acne prati. Et piscarife vi de xii denariis. Silua i porei. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xii libras. Modo, xv libras. Et tamen reddit comes xxxv libras. Goduinus tenuit. IN LEST DE EILESFORD. IN ROVECESTRE IIVNDREDO. Filius Willelmi tahum tenet de episcopo Delce. Pro uno solin et uno iugo se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et v uillani habent n carucas. Ibi xii acne prati. Silua i porci. T.R.E., et post, ualuit iii libras. Et modo, lxx solidos. Godricus tenuit de rege E. se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. Et ibi sunt in dominio. Et cum uno uillano et v bordariis. Et vi serais. Ibi xn acne prati. Et lx acne pastunc. T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet c solidos. Osuuardus tenet de rege E. .sdem Ansgotus tenet de episcopo Stoches. IN HOY HYNDREDO. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. Et ibi sunt in dominio. cum vn bordariis. Ibi una piscaria de n solidis. T.R.E., et post, ualuit c solidos. Modo, cx solidos. Anschil tenuit de rege E. Ipse episcopus Baiocensis tenet in dominio HOV. Pro l solins se defendebat T.R.E. Et modo, pro xxxm bu8 . Terra est l carucarum. In dominio sunt mi. Et c uillani, m minus, cum lxi cotariis, habent xliii carucas. Ibi vi gecclesiaj. Et xii serui. Et xxxii acne prati. Silua xxx porcorum. Totum Manerium, T.R.E., ualebat lx libras. Quando episcopus recepit, similiter. Et modo, tantundem. Et tamen qui cum tenet reddit c et xm libras. Huic Manerio pertinebant ix domus in Rouecestre ciuitate, et vi solidos reddebant, nec ablatce sunt. Hoc Manerium tenuit Goduinus comes. De hoc Manerio tenet Ricardus de Tonebrige dimidium solin. Et siluam xx porcorum. T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet xl solidos. Adam filius Huberti tenet de eodem Manerio unum solin et unum iugum, de episcopo. Et ibi habet unus homo eius in dominio dimidiam carucam. Et mi uillanos cum dimidia caruca. Et uno cotario. Valet et ualuit xxx solidos. Anschitil de Ros tenet de ipso Manerio iii solins. Et ibi habet in dominio i carucam. Et v uillani, cum xii cotariis, habent I carucam et dimidiam. Ibi v serui. Et unus molinus de x solidis. Et xii acne prati. Et n piscarife de v solidis. T.R.E., et post, ualebat vi libras. Modo, vi libras et v solidos. _A.dam tenet.de episcopo i iugum in Pinpa. IN TVIFERDE IiVNDREDO. Terra est Ibi habet dimidiam carucam cum n seruis. Et nn acras prati. Et dimidiam piscariam sine censu. Silua vi porcorum. ^fxx solidos. T.R.E. ualebat vi solidos. Et post, v solidos. Modo, x solidos. Et tamen reddit Godricus tenuit de rege E. de Columbels tenet de episcopo Ferlaga. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est un carucarum. Rannulfus non tenet nisi m a iuga. Et ibi habet in dominio i carucam. Et x uillanos. cum mi cotariis. habent in carucas. Ibi eccclesia. Et vii serai. Et i molinus de v solidis. Et x acne prati. Silua xv porcorum. T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet vn libras. Alnodus tenuit. De isto solin tenet Raynerus i iugum, de episcopo, in Manerio Pinpe. de rege. CHENTII. 3 Et ibi habet i carucam. cum ix serais. Et hi acras prati. Siluam nil porcorum. et post, cilt T.R.E., A ualebat xx solidos. Modo, XL solidos. Alnod tenuit de rege E. Haimo tenet de episcopo NEDESTEDE. Pro m solins se defendit. Terra est vi carucarum. In dominio est una. Et xrai uillani habent v Caracas. Ibi .-ecclcsia, 5 Et xim serui. Et n molini de xim solidis. Et piscaria de n solidis. Et vn acne prati. Silua xxxv porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat vra libras. Et post, vi libras. Modo, vm libras et v solidos. Norman tenuit de rege E. De isto Manerio habet episcopus xxx solidos, pro n hagas. Juadulfus filius Turaldi tenet Otringeberge. Pro n 1 ™ 8 10 solins se defendit. Terra est v carucarum. In dominio sunt n“. Et vi uillani cum viii bordariis habent hi carucas. Ibi tecclesia. Et n molini de m solidis. Et ii® acras prati. Et piscaria de xxx anguillis. Silua n porcorum. I.R.E., et post, ualuit xl solidos. Modo, vi libras. Leueua tenuit de rege E. Huic Manerio adjacent nn hagas in ciuitate reddentes hi solidos. » H ugo de Braiboue tenet de episcopo Otrinberge. Pro ii solins se defendit. Terra est rai carucarum. In dominio est una. Et rx uillani cum mi bordariis habent n Caracas. Ibi m serui. Et I molinus de xvi denariis. Et in acrse prati. Silua n porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit ini libras. Modo, c solidos. Godil tenuit de rege E. Txdeloldus tenuit de episcopo TESTAN. Et Robertas modo tenet ad firm am. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n“ carucas et dimidia. Et vn uillani cum m bordariis habent I carucam. Ibi xn serui. Et i molinus de in solidis. Et vm acras prati. Silua xx porcorum. {le retre E T.R.E. ualebat c solidos. Et post, lx solidos. Modo, c solidos. Eduuardus tenu 25 Hanc terram tenuerunt m fratres T.R.E. pro tribus Maneriis. Nunc est in unum. Isdem Adeloldus tenuit de episcopo BENEDESTEDE. Et Robertas tenet ad firmam. Pro uno iugo se defendit. Terra est Is dominio est i caraca. cum v seruis. Et una acra prati. Silua vi porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xx solidos. cilt. Modo, xl solidos. Godricus tenuit de Alnodo IN MEDESTAN HVNDREDO. so Jltannulfus de columbels tenet de episcopo Bermelie. Pro uno iugo se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. cum v seruis. Et nn acne prati. Silua in porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat xv solidos. Quando recepit, xx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. 35 dominio sunt m Caracas. Et xlvii uillani cum xi bordariis habent xvi carucas. Ibi in molini de xxxvi solidis et viii denariis. Et xvi serui. Et xx acrse prati. Silua l porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xxv libras. cilt Modo, xxx libras. Et tamen Robertas reddit lv libras. Alnod tenuit. De hoc Manerio tenet Helto dimidium solin. Et ibi habet I carucam. cum uno -io bordario. Et i franc Et n acras prati. Et siluam vi porcorum. Et ualet xl solidos. Jtadulfus filius Turaldi tenet de episcopo Litelbroteiiam. Pro uno solin et dimidio se defendit. Terra est In dominio est i caruca. Et mi uillani cum mi bordariis habent ii carucas. Ibi ii serui. Et n molini de mi solidis. Et n acrse prati. Silua v porcorum. 45 T.R.E., et post, ualuit xl solidos. Modo, lx solidos et liiii denarios. Ricardus de Tonebrige liabet in sua leuua quod ualet xiii solidos. Et Siluam l porcorum. Et Rex habet de eodem Manerio quod ualet xvi denarios. Hanc terram T.R.E. tenuerunt Goduinus et Eduinus pro n bus Maneriis. _A_dam tenet de episcopo Celca. Pro hi solins se defendit. Terra est 50 vn carucarum. In dominio sunt n". Et xim uillani cum vi bordariis habent v carucas. Ibi secclesia. Et un serui. Et unus molinus de v solidis. K Et xvi acrse prati. T.R.E. ualebat vn libras. Et post, ^ c solidos. CHENTH. tenet Moclo, x libras. Et tamen qui A reddit xim libras. l)e hoc Manerio est in manu regis quod ualet vn solid os, de nouo dono episcopi. In manu sua retinuit episcopus, in Ciuitate Rouecestre, m hagas quae ualent l denarios. Iu Exesse est una hida que iuste ad hoc Manerium pertinet. Goduin filius Dudeman tenuit. Modo tenet Rannulfus peurel. C JLsdem Adam tenet de episcopo He a HAM. Pro v solins se defendit. Terra est xn carucarum. In dominio sunt iii carucse. Et xxiiii uillani cum xii bordariis habent vi Caracas et dimidiam. Ibi xx serai. Et xxx aerie prati. Ibi aecclesia. Et i molinus de x solidis. Et piscaria de in solidis. Et, in Exesse, pastura cc ouibus. T.R.E. ualebat xn libras. Et post, vi libras. Modo, xv libras. Hanc terram tenuerant T.R.E. Goduin filius carli, et Toli, pro n Maneriis. y i n Xsdem Adam tenet de episcopo, A COLINGE, i soliu et dimidium. Terra est i carucae et dimidiae. In dominio sunt n carucae. Et v uillani habent dimidiam carucam. Ibi mi serui. Et vn acrae prati. Silua x porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xl solidos. Modo, im libras. Ricardus de Tonebrige quod habet in sua leuua ualet vii solidos. Vluuinus tenuit de Leuuino comite. Xsdem Adam tenet de episcopo Biciielei. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est dimidiae carucae. In dominio est dimidia caruca. Et unus uillanus cum dimidia caruca. Leuuino comite. Et n bordarii. Ibi I molinus de v solidis. Vluuinus tenuit de T.R.E., et post, ualuit x solidos. Modo, xv solidos. IN ESSAMELE HVNDREDO. Pro uno solin se Hadulfus filius Turaldi tenet de episcopo Arclei. defendit. Terra est dimidiae carucae. Et ibidem sunt adhuc xxx acrae terrae. In dominio est una caruca. Et vi uillani habent dimidiam carucam. Ibi xii acrae prati. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xl solidos. Modo, mi libras, comite Hvnef tenuit de Heraldo. Ansgotus de Rouecestre tenet Haxeitest. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est i carucae. In dominio est una caruca. Et n uillani. cum im serais. T.R.E. ualebat xx solidos. Quando recepit, xxx solidos. Modo, comite xl solidos. Goduinus tenuit de Goduino. Emulfus de Ilesding tenet de episcopo Clive. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio dimidia caruca. Et n uillani. Et x acrae prati. Et pastura c ouium. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xxx solidos. Duo fratres tenuerunt de rege E, Aluric et Ordric. Isdem Ernulfus tenet de episcopo Hadone. Pro ni iugis se defendit. Terra est i carucae. Et ibi est in dominio. Et vi uillani cum i bordario habent I carucam. Ibi vi acrae prati. T.R.E., et post, ualuit L solidos. Modo, lx solidos. Osuuardus tenuit de rege E. Odo tenet de episcopo, in eadem Hadone, i iugum. Terra est dimidiae carucae. In dominio nichil est. T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet xx solidos. Isdem Odo tenet de episcopo Colixges. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est dimidiae carucae. Ibi est. cum uno bordario. Et mi acrae prati. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xx solidos. Modo, xxx solidos. God /*E. yy Ztenuit de rege -IJLelto tenet de episcopo MELESTVN. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est i carucae. Et ibi est. cum v uillanis. Et i acra prati. T.R.E., et post, ualuit x solidos. Modo, xxx solidos. unit Vluuardus tenuit de rege E. IN DIMIDIO LEST DE MIDDELTONE. IN MILDETONE HVNDREDO. CKENTH. 85 Hugo de port tenet de episcopo TVNESTELLE. Pro m solins et dimidio se defendit. Terra est mi carucarum. In dominio sunt n carucse. Et ix uillani cum i caruca. Et ix semi. Silua x porcorum. Et salina de xu denariis. T.R.E., et post, ualebat vn libras. Modo, viii libras. 5 Osuuard tenuit de rege E. Xsdem Hugo tenet de episcopo CEKCE. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est 11 carucarum. In dominio est una. Et cum v bordariis. Et uno seruo. Et uno molino de vi libras vi solidis et vm denariis. Valet xxx solidos. Osuuardus tenuit. Isdem Hugo tenet de episcopo Tangas. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est 10 hi carucarum. In dominio sunt n“. Et v uillani cum i caruca. Ibi sccclesia. Et mi serui. Et unus molinus de vm solidis. Silua mi porcorum. ^tenuit. T.R.E., et post, ualuit vn libras. Modo, x libras et x solidos. Osuuardus De istis solins quos Hugo de port habet, tenuit Osuuardus v ad gablum ; Et hi solins, et unum iugum et dimidium, quos abstulit is uillanis regis. IN BORWART LEST. IN BRIGE IIVNDREDO. jAicardus filius Willelmi tenet de episcopo Borne. Pro vi solins se defendit. Terra est vm carucarum. In dominio sunt iii carucse. Et xltiii uillani cum iii bordariis habent x Caracas. Ibi secclesia. Et unus seruus. Et m mo- lini de xvi solidis et vm denariis. Piscaria de vi denariis. Pastura 20 unde araverunt extranei homines vi acras terras. Silua mi porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat xvm libras. Quando recepit, x libras. Modo, xix libras. Xsdem II. tenet de episcopo Stepedoxe. Osuuard tenebat T. R.E. Et tunc se defendebat pro i solin, dimidio iugo minus. Terra est ii carucarum. In dominio est. cum i seruo. Et v bordariis. Valet xxx solidos. Ipse episcopus Baiocensis tenet in dominio Haedes. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est mi carucarum. In dominio est una. Et ix uillani cum n carucis. Ibi secclesia. Et v serui. Silua xx porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat vii libras. 25 Et post, c solidos. Modo, vii libras. Et tamen reddit x libras. Eduinus tenuit /*de rege E. JLsdem episcopus tenet in dominio Stellinges. Pro uno iugo se defendit. Terra I caruca; et dimidise. In dominio nichil est nisi I bordarius. Ibi secclesia. Silua n porcorum. r.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, et modo, xl solidos. Alret tenuit de rege E. 30 Isdem episcopus tenet A dominio BvENES. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est vi' carucarum. In dominio sunt n m . Et xxv uillani cum mi bordariis habent vn carucas. Ibi fecclesia. Et vi serui. Et i molinus de xxxvni denariis. Et una salina de xxx denariis. Et dimidia piscaria mi denariorum. De pastura xl denarii. Silua vi porcorum et dimidii. ^^Leuinc tenuit de rege E. 35 T.R.E. ualebat xu libras. Et post, vii libras. Modo, xn libras. Et tamen reddit xvm libras. Quando Hugo de monfort tenuit, ualebat v solidos. Heec iii“ maneria episcopi Baiocensis tenet Rannulfus ad firmam. Hannulfus de columbels tenet de episcopo Hardes. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est mi carucarum. In dominio est dimidia caruca. Et ix uillani habent n Caracas. Ibi secclesia. Et vm serai. Et xm acra prati. Silua mi porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat vi libras. Et post, im libras. Modo, c solidos. Azor tenuit de rege E. IN DONAMESFORD HVNDREDO. Ipse episcopus tenet in dominio Wiciieiiam. Pro mi solins se defendit. Terra est xi carucarum. In dominio sunt 11“ carucse. Et xxxvi uillani, cum xxx^ii cotariis, habent ix carucas. Ibi secclesia. Et unus presbyter qui dat XL solidos per annum. Ibi unus parcus. Et n molini de l solidis. Et ii” salinse de xxxn denariis. Et iii piscarise de mi solidis. Et xxxii aerse prati. Pastura ad ccc oues, et ad xxxi animalia. Silua quater xx li porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat xxv libras. Quando recepit, xx libras. Modo, xxx libras. Huic Manerio pertinent in cantuaria iii masurse, reddentes to . biga vi solidos et vm denarios. Hoc Manerium tenuit Aluredus... de rege E. Adhuc iacet ad hunc Manerium dimidium solin liberse terra, CHENTH. quam Sired tenuit de Alured biga. Et modo tenet Goisfridus filius mal® terra; de episcopo baiocensi. Et ualet et semper ualuit lx solidos. In HTJNDRET et in Ciuitate cantuariensi habet Adam filius huberti, de episcopo, mi domos, et 11“ foris ciuitatem 5 qu® reddunt viii solidos. IN EODEM HYNDREDO H aimo Vicecomes tenet de episcopo LA.TINTONE. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est i carucee et dimidi®. In dominies est una caraca. cum n bordariis. Ibi paruum nemus de xn acris pastur®. T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet hi libras. 10 Isdem Haimo tenet de episcopo dimidium solin. Et est terra nn carucarum. In dominio sunt n“ came®. Et xi bordarii cum in carucis. Et xvi acr® silu® minut®. T.R.E. ualebat c solidos. Et post, vi libras. Et modo, ix libras. Has terras T.R.E. tenuerunt burgenses cantuarie, et usque ad episcopum baiocensem, qui ab eis cepit. IN LIMOWART LEST. IN FYLCHESTAN HYNDREDO. W illelmus de Arcis tenet Fvlchestan. T.R.E. se defendebat pro xl solins. Et modo, pro xxxix. Terra est c et xx l! carucarum. In dominio sunt xim caruc®. Et cc fi et ix" t ' ni uillani. Et quater xx et m bordarii. Inter omnes habent xlv carucas. 20 Ibi v fficclesi®, de quibus habet Archiepiscopus lv solidos. Ibi in serai. Et vii molini de ix libris et xii solidis. Ibi c acr® prati. Silua xl porcorum. Hoc Manerium tenuit Goduinus comes. D e hoc manerio tenet Hugo filius Willelmi ix solins de terra uillanorum. Et ibi habet in dominio irn carucas et dimidiam. Et xxx 25 viii uillanos cum xvn bordariis qui habent xvi carucas. Ibi iii ®cclesi®. Et unus molinus et dimidius de xvi solidis et v denariis. Et una salina de xxx denariis. Silua vi porcorum. Valet xx libras. Walterus de Appeuile tenet de hoc Manerio m iuga et xii acras terr®. Et ibi habet i carucam in dominio. Et iii uillanos cum i bordario. Valet xxx solidos. Aluredus tenet i solinum, et xl acras terr®. Et ibi habet in dominio n carucas. cum vi bordariis. Et xii acras prati. Valet im libras. Walterus filius Engelberti tenet dimidium solin, et XL acras. Et ibi habet in dominio i carucam. cum vn bordariis. Et v acras prati. Valet xxx solidos. Wesman tenet I solin. Et ibi habet in dominio i carucam. Et ii uillanos cum bordariis habentes i carucam et dimidiam. Valet mi libras. dapifer tenet I solin et I iugum, et vi acras terr®. Et ibi habet dominio i carucam. cum xi bordariis. Valet L solidos. tenet dimidium solin. Et ibi habet in dominio I carucam. cum riis. Et iii acras prati. Valet xx solidos. cum mi Bemardus de Sancto Audoeno mi solins. Et ibi habet in dominio iii arucas. Et vi uillani cum xi bordariis habent ii carucas. Ibi im serui. It ii molini de xxim solidis. Et xx acr® prati. Silua n porcorum. >e una dena, et de terra qu® data est ab his solins ad firmam, xeunt iii libr®. Inter totum, valet ix libras. laldricus tenet dimidium solin. Et ibi habet i carucam. Et ii uillanos urn vi bordariis. habent i carucam. Et unum molinum de xxx denariis. Valet xxx solidos. acardus tenet Lvm acras terr®. Et ibi habet i carucam. cum v bordariis. Valet x solidos Totum Fulcbestan, T.B.E., ualebat c et x libras. Quando recepit, 5n. libras. Modo, quod habet in dominio ualet c libras. Quod milites tenent supradicti /^sinuil ualet xlv libras et x solidos. CHENTH. 37 IN HONINBERG HYNDREDO. Episcopus baiocensis tenet in dominio Alham. Pro yi solins se defendit. Terra est xxim carucarum. In dominio sunt v carucse. Et xli uillanus cum viii bordariis habent xvin carucas. Ibi lecclesia. Et vin serui. 5 Et ii molini de vi solidis. Et xxvm aerie prati. Silua c porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xxx libras. Modo, xl. Et tamen reddit l libras. Hoc manerium tenuit Edericus de rege E. ’ TAT T>r»T7'TATTY17AT T_T\ IN ROYINDEN HYNDREDO. -A-dam filius huberti tenet de episcopo I denam de dimidio iugo, quae remansit extra diuisionem hugonis de montfort, et iacuit in 10 Belice. Ibi habet n uillanos, cum dimidia caruca. Valet et ualuit hoc semper x solidos. tenet de episcopo, In Bochelande, IN STOTINGES HYNDREDO. dimidium solin. Et ibi habet in dominio i carucam. cum uno uillano. Terra est n carucarum. T.R.E. ualebat xx solidos. Quando recepit, xxx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. IN ESTREA LEST. IN ESTRE HYNDREDO. 15 Jtvadulfus de curbespine tenet de episcopo unum iugum in Berfrestone. Ibi una paupercula mulier reddens iii denarios et unum obolum. Valet et ualuit semper x solidos hoc iugum. JLiannulfus de Columbels tenet ibi unum iugum, quod in Hordes esco- tavit, et nunc usque scotum regis non scotavit. 20 Adeloldus tenuit de episcopo Eswalt. Pro ni solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et vi uillani cum n bordariis habent in carucas. Ibi ii serui. Et siluula ad clausuram. T.R.E. ualebat ix libras. Modo, xv. Alnod cit tenuit de rege E. Osbemus filius Letardi tenet de episcopo i solin in Selinge. Ibi habet unum 25 uillanum reddentem n solidos. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, et modo, xxx solidos. Aluuinus tenuit T.R.E. Isdem Osbemus tenet de episcopo Popeselle. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n carucas. Et unus uillanus cum mi bordariis habent dimidiam carucam. Ilanc terrain tenuerant n° liberi homines de rege E. 30 Quidam miles eius tenet dimidium iugum. Et ibi habet i carucam in dominio. Totum: T.R.E. ualuit lx solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, c solidos. Hadulfus de Curbespine tenet IN BEVSBERGE HYNDREDO. dimidium iugum in Popessale. Et ibi habet hi boues. T.R.E., et post, ualuit mi solidos. modo, viii solidos. Vluric tenuit de rege E. Fulbertus tenuit de episcopo Berham. Pro vi IN BERHAM HYNDREDO. 35 solins se defendit. Terra est xxxii carucarum. In dominio sunt m carucas. Et lii uillani cum xx cotariis habent xviii Caracas. Ibi lecclesia. Et unus molinus de xx solidos et mi denariis. Ibi xxv piscarias de xxxv solidis, mi denariis minus. De auera, id est servitium, lx solidi. De 40 herbagio xxvi solidi. Et xx aerie prati. De pasnagio cl porci. De isto Manerio dedit episcopus unam bereuuicham Herbertin filio Iuonis, quae uocatur Huham. Et ibi habet I carucam in dominio. Et xn uillanos cum ix carucis. Et xx acras prati. De eodem quoque Manerio dedit episcopus Osbemo paisforere I solin. Et n molinos 45 de L solidis. Et ibi est in dominio i caruca. Et mi uillani cum I caruca. Totum Berham, T.R.E. ualebat xl libras. Quando episcopus recepit, similiter. Et tamen reddebat ei c libras. Modo, per se, Berham ualet xl libras. Et Hucham, x libras. Et hoc quod Osbemus habet, vi libras. Et terra cuiusdam Rannulfi militis ualet xl solidos. 50 Hoc manerium tenuit Stigandus archiepiscopus; sed non erat de archiepiscopatu ; ^fsed fuit de dominica firma regis E. 38 CHENTIi. "Vitalis de episcopo tenet SoANECLiVE. IN WITENESTAPLE IIVNDREDO. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est i Caracas et dimidiee. In dominio est i caruca. cum vm cotariis qui reddunt mi solidos et vi denarios. Silua xx porcoram. T.R.E. ualebat xxi solidos. Quando vitalis recepit, xii solidos. Modo, xxx solidos. Snoth 5 Eduuardus tenuit de rege E. Isdem Vitalis tenet de episcopo i iugum in eodem hundredo. Et ibi habet dimidiam carucam in dominio. cum iin bordariis reddentibus vi solidos. Terra est dimidiee Caracas. Silua x porcorum. T.RE., et post, ualuit x solidos. Modo, xx solidos. Vlsi tenuit de rege E. IN LESTA DE WIWARLET. IN FAVKESHANT IIVNDREDO. 10 _A_dam tenet de episcopo Ore. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est iin carucarum. In dominio est una. Et x uillani et x bordariis habent n carucas. Ibi dimidia eecclesia. Et unus molinus de xxii solidis. Et n® piscarite sine censu. Et i salina de xxvm denariis. Silua yi porcoram. T.R.E. ualebat mi libras. Et post, lx solidos. Modo, c solidos. Turgis tenuit de rege E. is Isdem adam tenet de episcopo STANEFELLE. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est mi carucarum. In dominio est i caraca Et x uillani habent n carucas. Ibi tecclesia. Et vi serui. Et n acne prati. Silua lx porcoram. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. comite Et post, xl solidos. Modo, c solidos. Turgis tenuit de Goduino. 20 25 40 Hugo de portli tenet de episcopo NORTONE. Pro im solins se defendit. Terra est nn carucarum. In dominio sunt m caraca. Et xvm uillani cum vi bordariis habent v carucas. Ibi hi acclesia. Et in molini sine censu. Et ii piscaria de xh denariis. Silua xl porcoram. T.R.E. ualebat vm libras. Et post, vi libras. Modo, xn libras. Osuuardus tenuit de rege E. ° IN FELEBERGE HVNDREDO. Fulbertus tenet de episcopo ClLLEHAM. Pro v solins se defendit. Terra est xx carucarum. In dominio sunt ii caruca. Et xxxvm uillani, cum xn cotariis, habent xn et dimidius carucas. Ibi acclesia. Et vi molini A de yi libris et vm solidis. Et n® pisca- ria de xvn denariis. Et pastura de xvm solidis et vn denariis. In cantuaria ciuitate xm masura pertinent huic Manerio, reddentes xv solidos. Et ix acra prati. Silua quater xx porcoram. T.RE. ualebat xl libras. Et post, xxx libras. Modo, xxx libras similiter. Et tarnen reddebat episcopo baiocensi quater xx libras et xl solidos. Sired tenuit de rege E. ° IN FAVRESI-IANT IIVNDREDO. H ugo nepos Herberti tenet de episcopo OSPRESTGES. Pro vn solins et dimidio se defendit. Terra est xx carucarum. In dominio non sunt caruca. Ibi xxix uillani cum vi bordariis habent xi carucas. Ibi acclesia. Et i molinus de xi solidis et vm denariis. Et piscaria de x denariis. Et salina de mi denariis. Et xm acra prati. Silua de quater xx porcis. De terra huius Manerii tenet Herbertus dimidium solin et m uirgas. Et ibi habet in dominio i carucam. Et i uillanum cum x bordariis habentes i carucam. Hicardus de maris tenet dimidium solin de hoc Manerio. Et ibi habet vi uillanos et i bordarium cum I caruca. Et quidam Turstinus tenet I iugum quod reddit v solidos. Totum Manerium, T.R.E., ualebat xx libras. Quando herbertus recepit, xv libras. Modo, xx libras. Huic Manerio pertinet in cantuaria i masura 45 de xxx denariis. Hoc manerium tenuit. Amsfridus tenet de episcopo CiLDRESHAM. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est m carucarum. In dominio est una. Et nn uillani cum n bordariis habent i carucam et dimidiam. Ibi v serui. Et n aerie prati. Silua est; sed nil reddit. De hoc manerio tenet quidam miles terram ad i carucam. Inter totum: T.R.E. so ualebat lx solidos. Et post, xl solidos. Modo, nn libras. OHENTH. Isclem Ansfridus tenet de episcopo ERNOLTUN. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est in carucarum. In dominio est una. Et vm uillani cum ri carucis et dimidia. Ibi n salince. Et in civitate cantuaria i masura de xxi denariis. 5 T.RE. ualebat im libras. Et post, xl solidos. Modo, c solidos. PIoc Manerium Buraod de rege E. tenuit. De isto Manerio tenet Eannulfus x acras, quce iaccnt iuxta civitatem, et reddebant xlii denarios T.E.E. Xsdem Ansfridus tenet de episcopo MACIIEHEVET. Pro uno iugo se defendit. Terra est dimidice carucce. Ibi sunt n uillani reddentes L denarios. 10 T.E.E., ualebat l denarios. Modo, ualet lx denarios. Seuuold tenuit T.RE. Isdem Ansfridus tenet de episcopo BADLESMERE. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est ir carucarum et dimidice. In dominio est una. Et x uillani habent i carucam et dimidiam. Ibi cecclesia. Et n serui. Et piscaria de xn denariis. Silua mi porcorum. T.E.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, lx solidos. 15 Modo, im libras. Hoc Manerium reclamat abbas Sancti Augustini, quia habuit T.E.E. Et hundredum attestantur ei: Sed filius liominis dicit patrem suum se posse uertere ubi uoluerit: et hoc non annuunt monachi. Xsdem Ansfridus tenet de episcopo Perie. Pro uno iugo se defendebat. Ibi est unus bordarius reddens v denarios. T.E.E. et post, et modo, ualet xvi solidos. 20 Wlui tenuit de rege E. Isdem Ansfridus tenet de episcopo PERIE. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est i carucce. Ibi m bordarii. Et una masura in civitate de xvi ^fde rege E. denariis. T.E.E. et post, et modo, valet xxini solidos. Yluena tenuit 25 Osbernus tenet de episcopo BOCIIELAND. Pro in iugis se defendit. Terra est I carucce. In dominio est una. Et hi uillani cum n bordariis habent dimidiam carucam. Ibi vm serui. /fSeuuardus tenuit de rege E. T.RE. ualebat mi libras. Et post, m libras. Et modo, lxx solidos. Isdem Osbernus tenet unum iugum de episcopo in eodem Manerio. Et pro i iugo 30 se defendit. T.E.E. ualebat xx solidos. Et post, et modo, ualet x solidos. Leuuardus tenuit de rege E. Hugo de porth tenet de episcopo Herste. Pro m b ” iugis se defendit. Terra est i carucce. In dominio est. cum n bordariis et n seruis. T.E.E., et post, ualuit x solidos. Modo, xxx solidos. 35 Osuuardus tenuit de rege E. Adam tenet de episcopo unum iugum in Ore. Et pro i iugo se defendit. Terra est i carucce. Hanc tenent mi uillani modo ad firmam. Et reddunt xx solidos. Et tantundem semper ualuit. Ibi cecclesia est. Leuuold tenuit de rege E. ■lo XXerfridus tenet Trevelai. Pro hi solins se defendit. Terra est vm carucarum. In dominio est una. Et xxmi uillani cum v bordariis habent vi carucas et dimidiam. Ibi cecclesia. Et v serui. Silua xx porcorum. Et in civitate, m hage de xxxii denariis. T.E.E. ualebat vn libras. Et post, vi libras. 45 Modo, vm libras. Ylnod tenuit de rege E. Herbertus tenuit de episcopo NORDESLINGE. Terra est i carucce. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Ibi ii bordarii reddunt ii solidos. T.E.E., et post, ualuit xx solidos. Modo, xxv solidos. Turgod tenuit T.E.E. 50 Hcec n° Maneria tenuit Herbertus filius Iuonis de episcopo Baiocensi. 39 CHENTH. 1 urstinus de girunde tenet, in Bochelande, i iugum, de episcopo. Et pro i iugo se defendit. Ibi est unus uillanus reddens vi solidos. Valet et naluit semper xii solidos. Turgot tenuit de rege E. Ro gems filius Anschitil tenet de episcopo ESLINGES. Pro imo solin 5 se defendit. Terra est I carucie. Ibi est in dominio. Et unus bordarius habet dimidiam carucam. Ibi eecclcsia. Et i molinus de x solidis. Et n acree prati. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. Vnlot tenuit de rege E.; et potuit ire quo uoluit cum terra. Ftilbe rtus tenet de episcopo ESLINGES. Pro y solins se defendebat T.R.E. io Et modo, pro ii bus . Et sic fecit postquam episcopus dedit Manerium hugoni filio fulberti. Terra est vr carucarum. In dominio sunt n Caracas. Et xxx ta uillani liabent hi Caracas. Ibi tecclesia. Et xxviii serai. Et i molinus de x solidis. Silua xxx porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Et quando recepit, vi libras. Modo, mi libras. Et tamen episcopus liabuit vm libras. Sired tenuit de rege E. is Isdem Fulbertus tenet de episcopo DodEHAM. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est. In dominio est una caruca. Et xvn uillani cum x bordariis habent n Caracas. Ibi Eecclesia. Et vi send. Et dimidia piscaria de ccc allecibus. Et in cantuaria ciuitate v hagie de vii solidis et x denariis. T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Episcopus misit ad firmain pro x libris. Quando ful- 20 bertus recepit, vi libras. Et modo, similiter. Sired tenuit de rege E. Ricardus tenet de episcopo RONGOSTOXE. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est. Ibi n uillani habent ii carucas. Et reddunt vr solidos. T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet xl solidos. Vluiet tenuit de rege E. IN FERLEBERGE HVNDREDO. 25 tenet de episcopo Hortoxe. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est i Caracas. Ibi est in dominio. Et xii uillani liabent dimidiam carucam. Ibi i seruus. Et ii molini de una marka argenti. Et vm aerie prati. Et c acne siluee minutic. T.R.E. ualebat xl. xxx solidos. Modo, c solidos. Godricus tenu.ge E. Adam tenet de episcopo Faxxe. Pro dimidio solin IN VNDREDO. se defendit. Teira est I caracte et dimidice. In dominio sunt ii carucie. Et m uillani. Et m serai. Et ascclesia. Et xm acne prati. Silua x porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat im libras, post, xx solidos. Modo, mi libras. Hugo de Montfort tenet inde quod ualet xx solidos. tenet de episcopo Berchvelle. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est i carucie. Ibi est in dominio. Et m uillani. Et hi serui. Et unus molinus de xl denariis. Et x aerie prati. Et unum alnetum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. Werelin tenuit de rege. •lo Isdem Wadardus tenet de episcopo Cvmbe. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. In dominio est una. Et ix uillani cum v bordariis habent i carucam et dimidiam. Ibi xim acree prati. Silua v porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, l solidos. Modo, im libras, et ser- uitium unius militis. Leuret de rochinge tenuit de rege E. 45 Radulfus de curbespine tenet de episcopo Betmoxtestvx. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est vi carucarum. In dominio sunt n*. Et xii uillani cum i bordario habent hi carucas. Ibi xxxiii acne prati. Et silua xl porcorum. De isto Manerio tenet Hugo de montfort, inter siluam et pasturam, quod ualebat T.R.E. vi libras. Et post, so et modo, tantundem. Ailricus tenuit de rege E. CHENTH. 41 -Axleloldus tenuit de episcopo Dene. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. In dominio est una caruca. Et ini bordarii. Et n serui. Et una acra prati. Et silua vir porcorum. De isto solino tenet Radulfus de curbespine i iugum , et dimidium, quod ualet et ualuit semper x solidos. Adeloldus habuit dimidium 5 solin et dimidium jugum. Et, T.R.E., ualebat xl solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. time terra est in manu regis. Hanc terram tenuerunt Vlnod, et Waua, et Aluuard, et Vlueron, de rege E. Et erat dis- partita in tribus locis. IN CALEHEYE HVNDREDO. Badulfus de curbespine tenet Piyentone de feudo episcopi; et Hugo io de eo. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est v carucarum. In dominio est una et dimidia. Et vii uillani cum vn bordariis habent m carucas et dimidiam. Ibi Eecclesia. Et ix serui. Et unus molinus de lv denariis. Et xx acrte prati. Silua lx porcorum. biga T.R.E. ualebat vm libras. Et post, c solidos. Modo, vi libras. Sbern tenuit de rege E. Isdem Radulfus tenet m denas, qum remanserunt extra diuisionem Hugonis 15 de montfort, de pistinges Manerio. Et ibi est unum iugum terra, et una uirga. Et ibi sunt hi uillani. Valet et ualuit semper xv solidos. IN FERLIBERG IiVNDEEDO. Herfridus tenet de feudo episcopi ESSAMELESFORD. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est I carucas. In dominio est i caruca. Et hi uillani cum I bordario habent I carucam. Ibi iii serui. Et vm acra prati. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, 20 xl solidos. Modo, lx solidos. Alrec tenuit de rege E. Osbertus tenet de Willelmo filio Taum Aldelose. IN BILISSOLD HYNDREDO. Ibi iacet dimidium solin. Terra est ii carucarum. In dominio est una caruca. Et hi uillani habent dimidiam carucam. T.R.E. ualebat xxx solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. Htec terra est de feudo episcopi baiocensis ; et remansit foris 25 diuisionem suam. Godric tenuit de rege E. cum Bradebvrne Manerio. IN LIMOWART LEST. IN OXENA 1 HVNDREDO. Osbernus paisforer tenet de episcopo Palestrei. Pro iii iugis se defendit. Terra est ii carucarum. In dominio est una. Et ix bordarii habent dimidiam carucam. Ibi eecclesia. Et ii serui. Et x acra prati. Et v piscariee de xii denariis. Silua x porcorum. presbyter 30 T.R.E., et post, ualuit xl solidos. Modo, lx solidos. Eduui tenuit de rege E. IN LEST DE ESTREI. IN BEVSBERGE HYNDREDO. Isdem Osbernus tenet de episcopo xii acras teme, quee ualent per annum mi solidos. Hugo de porth tenet de episcopo Pesinges et Pikam. Pro ii solins se defendunt. Terra est In dominio n Caracas et dimidia. Et vi uillani cum xiiii 35 bordariis habent I carucam. T.R.E. ualebant C solidos. Et post, nichil. Modo, vi libras. Lefstan, et Leuuin, et Eluret, et Sired, et alii ii, tenuerunt T.R.E.; et poterant ire quolibet cum tends suis. IN LIMOWART LEST. IN NEVCERCE. Episcopus Baiocensis tenet in dominio BlLSVlTONE. Pro mi solins se defendit. Terra est xv carucarum. In dominio sunt v. Et xlvii uillani cum 40 xxvii bordariis habent xiiii carucas. Ibi Eecclesia. Et x salinas de c denariis. Et x acras prati. Silua l porcorum. Et n re piscarise de v denariis. T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Et post, xxx libras. Modo, l libras. Et tamen reddit cilt de firma lxx libras. Alnold tenuit. In hoc Manerio misit episcopus m ea denas quas remanserant extra diuisionem comitis de Ow. 45 Hotbertus de Romenel tenet de episcopo IN LANTPORT HVNDREDO. Afettvne. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est m carucarum. In dominio est una. Et ix uillani cum hi bordariis habent iii carucas et dimidiam. Ibi ii serui. T.R.E. ualebat c solidos. Et post, l solidos. Modo, im libras. Isdem Rotbertus tenet de episcopo in Maresco dimidium solin, et pro tanto se defendit. 50 Terra est n carucarum. Ibi xi uillani cum n bordariis habent m carucas. Et piscariam I /de ii solidis. sdem Robertas habet l burgenses in burgo de Romenel. Et de eis habet rex omne seruitium. Et sunt quieti, pro seruitio maris, ab omni consuetudine prater tribus, latrocinio, pace infracta et forstel. CIIENTH. T.R.E., et post, ualuit XL solidos. Modo, L solidos. comite. de Goduino Alsi tenuit. Isdem Robertus tenet de episcopo dimidium solin in Maresco. Et pro tanto se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. In dominio est dimidia caruca. Et xv uillani cum 11 bordariis habent m carucas et dimidiam. T.R.E., et post, ualebat xxx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. Sex sochmanni tenuerunt T.R.E. _^ IN ROYINDENE IIVNDREDO. Isdem Rotbertus tenet de episcopo Benes’DEXE. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. In dominio est una caruca. Et mi uillani cum ix bordariis habcut n carucas. Ibi silua v porcorum. Et una mcclesia. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xl solidos. Modo, l solidos. Osier tenuit de rege E. \DILOVTESBRIGE Isdem Rotbertus tenet de episcopo dimidium iugum, et pro tanto se defendit. NUREDO. Ibi una uidua manet reddens xni cim denarios per annum. Valet et ua¬ luit semper x solidos. Duo sochmanni tenuerunt T.R.E. sine aulis et dominiis. Isdem Rotbertus tenet de episcopo dimidiam denam de Manerio TlTENTONE, quod tenet Hugo de Montfort. Et ibi habet terrain ad dimidiam carucam. Et unum uillanum cum m bordariis et dimidia caruca. Et ii“ s piscarias de v solidis. Valet hoc totum, et ualuit, xv solidos. Heec terra est extra diuisionem Hugonis. IN LEST DE ESTREI. IN ESTREI IIVNDREDO. Herbertus tenet, ad firmam de rege, RlXGETONE. De feudo est episcopi. Terra est In dominio sunt n“ caruca;. Et mi uillani cum vii bordariis habent n carucas et dimidiam. Ibi unus molinus de xl solidis. T.R.E. ualebat viii libras. Quando recepit, c solidos. Modo, vni libras. Et tamen reddit xiii libras. Eduuardus tenuit de rege E. Ad am tenet, de feudo episcopi, in Hamolde, dimidium iugum. Riculfus tenet de Adam. Et aliud dimidium iugum de AlMOLDE tenet Herbertus, de hugone nepote Herberti. Hoc utrunque ualet xx solidos. Hugo tenet Ewelle de episcopo. Pro in solins IN BEVSBERG IIVNDREDO. se defendit. Terra est In dominio est i caruca. Et xv uillani cum xii bordariis habent ix carucas. Ibi ii molini de xlvi solidis. Et iiii acraj prati. Silua mi porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat xu libras. Et post, c solidos. Modo, x libras. Et tamen reddit xxr libras et xii solidos. Edricus de Alham tenuit de rege E. De isto Manerio tenet Hugo de Montfort xvn acras terras, et unam denam et dimidiam, quod appreciatur vii solidis. Isdem Hugo tenet de episcopo WESCLIVE. Pro ii solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio est I caruca. Et xvn uillani habent ii carucas. T.R.E. ualebat viii libras. Quando recepit, vi libras. Modo, viii libras. De hoc Manerio tenet Hugo de montfort ii molinos de xx vm solidis. Edricus tenuit de rege E. T Hugo -Lsdem tenet Soltone de episcopo. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et in uillani cum uno bordario reddunt iiii solidos et vii denarios. T.R.E. ualebat xv libras. Et post, et modo, xxx solidos. In hoc Manerio mansit Godricus. Et tenuit xx li acras de alodio suo. Idem Hugo tenet in Dovere unum molinum, qui reddit xlviii ferlingels de frumento, et non pertinet ulli Manerio. Ansfridus tenet de feudo episcopi in Leueberge dimidium iugum. Et ibi habet I uillanum et i bordarium. Valet v solidos. Leuuinus tenuit de rege E. JLbidem mansit quidam Altet, qui tenuit de rege E. ii" 9 acras in alodium; et tenuit eas de Ansfrido. Et appreciatur vi solidis. Hadulfus de curbespine tenet Colret de episcopo. Terra est In dominio i caruca et dimidia. Et vi uillani cum vii bordariis habent n carucas. Ibi ii serai. Et iiii acne prati. Pro n solins se defendit. T.R.E. ualebat viii libras. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, vi libras. Molleue tenuit de rege E. Isdem Radulfus tenet Ewelle. Pro in solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et v uillani cum mi bordariis habent ri carucas. Ibi silua x porcorum. De hoc Manerio tenet quidam miles i solin de Radulfo. Et ibi habet i carucam. jTcum hi bordariis. CIIENTH. T °tum Manerium, T.R.E., nalebat xii libras. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. Et, tamen, quod Radulfus habet, reddit mi libras. Hugo de montfort habet caput manerii. Et ibi v molini et dimidius de vi libris. T , t> t i (■ , , , . _ /T Molleue tenuit de rege E. -Lsdem Kadultus tenet de episcopo Svanetone. Pro II solins se defendit. Terra est In dominio i carnoa. Et n bordarii cum dimidia caruca. De hac terra tenet Robertas de barbes i solin. Et ibi habet rn uillanos cum dimidia caruca. Et quidam Hugo tenet i solin. Et habet ibi i carucam in dominio. Et unum bordanum. T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Quando recepit, xxx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. Et tamen reddit un libras. Coloen tenuit de rege E. lsdem Radulfus tenet de episcopo Apletone. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n carucse. cum yi bordariis. I.R.E. ualebat c solidos. Et post, x solidos. Modo, xl solidos. Ascored tenuit de rege E. ]5 t6net de hug ° ne Brochestele : et est de feudo episcopi. Pio uno solin se defendebat. Terra est In dominio est i caruca. Et n serui. l.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, lx. Modo, xl. Quando herbertus recepit, ni" iuga. Modo n iuga. Vlnod tenuit de rege E. Turstinus tinel, et uxor eius, tenent ad firmam de rege W., in leue- 20 berge, i iugum et y acras. Et ibi sunt n uillani cum n bordariis. Valet et ualuit semper vm solidos. Boche tenuit de rege E. IN LEST DE ESTREI. IN ESTREI HVNDREDO. Ansfridus tenet de episcopo Gollesberge. Pro n solins et hi iugis se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n® carucse. Et xxun or uillani. T.RE. ualebat xii libras. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, ix libras. In Sanduuic habet archiepiscopus xxxn masuras ad hoc Manerium pertinentes. Et reddunt xlii solidos et vin denarios. Et Adeluuoldus habet i iugum quod ualet x solidos. Hoc Manerium tenuerunt.teigni de rege E.; et m es manebant ibi assidui.tenebant inde n os solins in paragio ; sed non m . . . . nt ibi. Quando Ansfridus recepit, fecit unum Manerium. Turstinus tenet de episcopo CnENOLTONE. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n carucse. cum n bordariis. T.R.E., et post, mi libras. Modo, vn libras. Et tamen reddit vm libras. Eduuardus r\ _ _ ^Ttenuit de rege E. V/sbertus filius letardi tenet de episcopo Bedesham. Pro uno iugo et dimidio se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. cum uno uillano et im bordariis. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, xxx solidos. Modo, l solidos. Godesa tenuit de rege E. In eodem Manerio tenent de ipso osberno x teigni unum solin et dimidium iugum. Et ibi habent ipsi mi carucas et dimidiam. T.R.E. ualebat c solidos. Et post, xxx solidos. Modo, lx solidos. Ansfridus tenet de episcopo Soles. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt n carucfe. Et vm uillani cum dimidia caruca. 45 T.RE. ualebat c solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, vi libras. Elmer tenuit de rege E. Radulfus filius Roberti tenet de episcopo Hertange. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et v uillani cum ii bordariis habent ii carucas. T.R.E. ualebat xl solidos. Et post, x solidos. Modo, lx solidos. so Eddid tenuit de rege E. Osbernus tenet de episcopo i iugum et dimidium in eodem hundredo. ibi habet vn bordarios. T.R.E. ualuit x libras. Et post, x solidos. Modo, xxx solidos. Ernold tenuit de rege E. CHENTH. IN BEVSBERGE HVNDREDO. Hugo de montfort tenet de episcopo i solin uacuee terrse extra diuisionem suam, et adiacuit N EVEN TONE Manerium, quod habet intra suam diuisionem. Et ibi habet i bordarium. Valet et ualuit semper lx solidos. 5 Wibertus tenet dimidium iugum, IN ESTREI HVNDREDO. quod iacuit in gildam de Dovere. Et modo defendit se cum terra Osberti filii Letardi. Et ualet per annum mi solidos. Osbernus filius Letardi tenet de episcopo Hama. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est I caruca. cum uno uillano et n bordariis. Et n seruis. 10 T.R.E. ualebat l solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, lx solidos. Tres teigni tenuerunt de rege E. Xsdem osbernus tenet de episcopo ClLLEDENE. Pro uno solin et uno iugo et x acris se defendit. Terra est In dominio nichil modo. sed ix uillani habent ibi n Caracas et dimidiam. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, 15 xxx solidos. Modo, XL solidos. Goduinus tenuit de rege E. Et alii v teigni. Osbernus misit terras eorum in unum Manerium. Aluredus tenet de episcopo Midelea. Pro hi iugis et xn acris se defendit. Terra est m carucarum. In dominio est una caruca et dimidia. Et v uillani cum ix bordariis habent I carucam. Ibi secclesia. Et x acne prati. Silua x 20 porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, XL solidos. Modo, lx solidos. Godricus tenuit de rege E. b IN SVMMERDENE HVNDREDO. Hotbertus Latinus tenet vi acras terrse. Et ibi habet dimidiam carucam. Hanc terram tenuit unus sochmannus. Et de nouo dono episcopi, habet, in manu comitis regis, de Ricardo filio Gisleberti, x uillanos cum hi carucis. Et siluam 25 l porcorum. Et inde reddit Rotbertus de firma vi libras. Turstinus tenet de episcopo Ticheteste. Pro uno solin et dimidio se defendit. Terra est In dominio est i caruca. cum mi bordariis. et Et parua siluula. T.R.E. ualebat nn libras. Et post, xl solidos. Modo, c solidos. Edricus de Alham tenuit de rege E. 30 Isdem Turstinus tenet de episcopo i iugum in Wanesberge. Et ibi sunt ii bordarii. Tochi tenuit de rege E. Isdem Turstinus tenet de episcopo i iugum in Ece. Et ibi sunt nn bordarii. HcCC ii° iuga, T.R.E., ualebant xv solidos. Et post, x solidos. Modo, xx solidos. Osbertus tenet de episcopo i iugum et x acras in MASSEBERGE. 35 Et ibi sunt ii uillani cum dimidia caruca. Goduinus tenuit de rege E. Isdem osbertus tenet de episcopo xv acras in ESMETONE. Et ibi manet unus presbyter. Hoc utrunque T.R.E. ualebat xxx solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, xxx solidos. Sired tenuit de rege E. IN ESTREI HVNDREDO. Itadulfus de curbespine tenet de episcopo ii solins in W alwalesere. Terra est In dominio i caruca et dimidia, Et xhii uillani cum ii carucis et dimidia. De hac terra habet Robertus dimidium solin. Et unam carucam ibi. T.R.E. ualebat m libras et x solidos. Et post, l solidos. Modo, vn libras. Wluuard tenuit de rege E. 45 Osbertus filius Letardi tenet de episcopo i iugum in Ece. Et ibi sunt m uillani. T.R.E. ualebat xii solidos. Et post, vi solidos. Modo, xvi solidos. Bernoltus tenuit de rege E. Hadulfus de curbespine tenet de episcopo Essewelle. Pro iii so¬ lins se defendit. Terra est In dominio sunt hi carucEe. Et unus so uillanus cum vn bordariis habent dimidiam carucam. Ibi unus seruus. Valet vi libras. Molleue tenuit de rege E. CHENTH. 45 Osbercms tenet de episcopo unum Manerium, quod tenuerunt m liberi homines de rege E. Pro uno solin et dimidio se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et turns uillanus cum uno bordario habet dimidiam carucam. T.R.E., et post, et modo, ualet mi libras. -Lladulfus de columbers tenet de episcopo SELINGES. Pro imo solm et dimidio se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et iiii uillani cum m bordariis habent dimidiam carucam, et i carucam et dimidiam. T.R.E. ualebat nn libras. Et post, xl solidos. Modo, c solidos. Yluuic tenuit de rege E. de episcopo 10 JAadulfus de curbespine tenet Danetone. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est iii carucarum. In dominio est una. Et iiii uillani cum ii bordariis habent i carucam. Ibi secclesia. Et nn masurse in cantuaria reddentes vi solidos, unum denarium minus. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, lx solidos. Molleue tenuit de rege E. 15 Xsdem Radulfus tenet de episcopo i iugum in Beocieestele, Quod Molleue tenuit de rege E. Et ibi est unus uillanus reddens xxx denarios. Radulfus de curbespine tenet XL aeras terras IN BEVSBEKGE IIVNDREDO. quas tenuit Molleue de rege E. Et ibi est unus uillanus reddens vi solidos. Et tantum ualet. de ualbadon tenet dimidium iugum in IlAMESTEDE, quod tenuerunt u liberi homines de rege E. in Bochelande. Et dicit modo Rannulfus, quod episcopus baiocensis dedit cuidam suo fratri. Valet x solidos Ibi est unus uillanus reddens xxx denarios. IN NUNNIBERG HVNDREDO. de ros tenet de feudo episcopi Acres, quod tenuerunt 25 duo fratres. Et quisque habuit liaulam. Modo est pro uno Manerio. Et pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. In dominio est una caruca et dimidia. Et v uillani cum v bordariis habent i carucam. Silua x porcorum. Et eecclesia. T.R.E. ualebat xl solidos. Et post, xxx solidos. Modo, lx solidos. uogerius filius Anschitil tenet de IN BRICEODE HVNDREDO. 30 feudo episcopi Hastingelal quod tenuit Vlnod de rege E. Et tunc defendebat se pro uno solin. Et modo, pro m iugis ; quia Hugo de montfort tenet aliam partem intra diuisionem suam. Terra est iii carucarum. In dominio sunt ii” Et n uillani cum vi bordariis habent i carucam. Ibi mi serui. Et silua i porci. as T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, xxx solidos. Modo, lx solidos. TERRA /ECCLESI.E DE LABATAILGE. tenet BBAS Sancti Martini de loco belli Manerium quod uocatur Wr. quod T.R.E., et modo, se defendit pro vn solins. Terra est lii carucarum. . In dominio ix carncte sunt. Et cxim uillani cum xxtt bordariis habent .VI. Zxxx solidos. JAotbertus tenet de Ilugone in eodem Maresch sextam partem unius iugi. Ynus sochmannus tenuit. Yalet et ualuit v solidos. IN HEN HVNDREDO. R biga ogerius tenet de Hugone PoSTINGES. Sbern tenuit. Pro duobus solins et dimidio se defendit. Terra est xm carucarum. In dominio sunt in 09 . Et xvi uillani cum vn bordariis habent vii carucas. Ibi n acclesiola. Et n molini de vi solidis. Et xl acrae prati. Silua xr, porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Et post, c solidos. Modo, xnn libras. De isto Manerio tenet Radulfus de curbespine in denas. Extra diuisionem sunt. Et ualent xv solidos. I bot sdem Hugo tenet dimidium solin quod Aldred tenuit de rege E., sine halla. Pro dimidio solin se defendit. Terra est hi carucarum. Ibi unus uillanus cum nn bordariis manct. nulla ibi caruca. 25 Ynus molinus de xxv denariis. Et v aerie prati. Xsdem Hugo tenet Belice. Turgis tenuit de rege E. Et pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est In dominio est una caruca. Et n° uillani cum uno bordario habent i carucam. Ibi in acne prati. Ha dua terras T.RE. ualebant lx solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, lx solidos. 30 Ipse Hugo tenet unam terram quam IN NEWECERCE HVNDREDO. Rot Azor tenuit de rege E., sine halla. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est v carucarum. Ibi vm uillani cum in bordariis habent n carucas. T.RE. et post, ualuit vm libras. Modo, ix libras. Ipse Hugo tenet dimidium solin in Maresch de Romenel. 35 Pro tanto se defendit. Terra est mi carucarum. Duodecim sochmanni te¬ nuerunt, et tenent, habentes mi carucas. Valet et ualuit lx solidos. Isdem Hugo tenet in ipso Maresch IN ADELOVESBRIGE HVNDREDO. unum iugum. Pro tanto se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. Ibi sunt xn sochmanni, cum vm bordariis, habentes II carucas. 40 Hie dua terras T.R.E. ualebant cx solidos. Et post, et modo, similiter IN BLACIiEBVRNE HVNDREDO. Ipse Hugo tenet Tintentone. Vlnod tenuit de rege E. Et tunc defendebat se pro uno solin.. Modo, pro dimidio ; quia foris diuisionem est. Terra est v carucarum. In dominio sunt 45 n“ caruca. Et xxi uillanus cum vi bordariis habent vn carucas. Ibi acclesia. Et ix semi. Et m piscaria de v solidis. Et xxxvm acne prati. Silua xl porcorum. T.RE. ualebat xii libras. Et post, vi libras. Modo, vn libras. Isdem Hugo tenet dimidium iugum quod tenuerunt v sochmanni. go Et modo tenent, habentes i carucam ibi. cum mi bordariis. Valet et ualuit ^fsemper v solidos. CIIENTH. 1 .erueus tenet tie Hugone IN ESTRAITES HVNDREDO. Sedlinges. Osuuard tenuit de rege E. Pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est vii carucarum. In dominio sunt iii carucie. Et viii uillani cum xxv bordariis habent mi Caracas. Ibi u cecclesite. 5 Et unus molinus de xxx denariis. Et xxxvi acne prati. Et silua de vi porcis. T.R.E. ualebat viii libras. Et post, c solidos. Modo, vii libras. Alnod tenet de Hugone, Hoetone. IN STOTINGES HVNDREDO. Leuuinus tenuit de rege E. Et pro dimidio solin se 10 defendit. Terra est iii carucarum. In dominio sunt ii* carucm. Et v uillani cum vi bordariis habent i carucam et dimidiam. Ibi tecclesia. Et unus molinus de xxv denariis. Et xxiiii acne prati. Silua x porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat XL solidos. Et post, xx. Modo, lx solidos. Ibidem tenet Alnod i iugum de Hugone. Sed nil ibi est. is Ipse Hugo tenet m uirgas et dimidiam in eodem Lest, quas tenuerunt iii sochmanni de rege E. Ibi modo unus uillanus habet dimidiam carucam cum iii bordariis. Valet et ualuit semper x solidos. IN HAME HVNDREDO. Willelmus tenet de Hugone m a iuga et dimidiam uirga in 20 Orlavestone. Hanc terram tenuerunt xi sochmanni. Terra est hi carucarum. Ibi modo ii carucie in dominio. Et xv uillani cum ix bordariis habent in Caracas et dimidiam. Ibi n' D lecclesiie. Et xx aerie prati. Silua vi porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, xxx solidos. Modo, c solidos. Hadulfus filius Ricardi tenet de Hugone dimidium solin 25 in Rochinges, quod Leuret tenuit de rege E. Pro dimidio solin 'se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. Ibi modo xii uillani habent unam carucam et dimidiam. De silua i porcus. T.R.E. ualebat l solidos. Et post, xxx solidos. Modo, l solidos. Radulfus tenet de Hugone Hortvn. IN STOTINGES HVNDREDO. 30 Duo sochmanni tenuerunt de rege E. Et pro uno iugo et dimidio se defendit. Terra est i carucie et dimidi*. In dominio est una. cum mi uillanis. Et unus molinus de xxx denariis. Et x aerie prati. De silua vi porci. T.R.E. ualebat xl solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, xxx solidos. Hugo de manneuile tenet de Hugone IN ESTRAITES HVNDREDO. 35 Estraites. Vlnod tenuit de rege E. Pro n solins se defendit. Terra est viii carucarum. In dominio sunt n®. Et xi uillani cum xxv bordariis habent v carucas. Ibi iccclesia. Et vii serui. Et xxx aerie prati. T.R.E. ualebat x solidos. Et post, mi solidos. Modo, vm libras. _A_nsfridus tenet de Hugone I iugum, quod tenuit in eodem hundredo 40 unus sochmannus de rege E. Et pro uno iugo se defendit. Terra est i carucic. Ibi est. cum uno uillano et ii bordariis. Et unus molinus de xxvi denariis. Et vm acne prati. T.R.E., et modo, ualet xl solidos. Hotbcrtus cocus tenet de Hugone i iugum, quod tenuit unus sochmannus. Et pro tanto se defendit. Ibi est una caruca cum uno bordario. Et mi aerte 45 prati. T.R.E., et modo, ualet xxx solidos. Grislebertus tenet de Hugone unum iugum, IN LANGEBRIGE HVNDREDO. quod tenuit quidam sochmannus de rege E. Valet et ualuit mi solidos. Nil ibi fuit, nec est. De Etwelle quod tenet herbertus filius Iuonis extra diuisionem Iiugonis, 50 tenet ipse Hugo xnn acras terrie infra suam diuisionem. Et ualet ii solidos. CHENTH. 53 IN ESTREA LEST. IN BEVSBEllGE HVNDREDO. Ipse Hugo de montfort tenet Etwelle. Molleue tenuit. Pro hi solins se defendebat. Et modo pro i° solin. Terra est i Caracas. Et ibi est in dominio. Et xix bordarii habcnt i carucam. Ibi et dimidius 5 ascclesia. Et nn molini A de nil libris et xvii solidis et mi denariis. Et mi acne prati. T.R.E. ualebat xi libras. Et post, mi libras. Modo, vm libras. Ipse Hugo tenet NeveNTONE. Edericus tenuit de rege E. Et pro ii solins se defendebat tunc. Et modo, pro uno; quia alius est extra diuisionem. Terra est u carucarum. Et ibi sunt in dominio. Ibi ascclesia. Et xxi bordarii, et m 10 serai, cum m carucis. Ibi in molini et dimidius de cv solidis. Totum, T.R.E., ualebat xn libras. Et post, in libras. Modo, xn libras, quod habet Hugo intra diuisionem suam. Intra diuisionem hanc est unus sochmannus tenens xvi acras terras. Et ipse idem tenuit de rege E. is In eodem hundredo tenet idem Hugo unam partem Jaonei quee nichil reddit nec reddidit; nec ad ullum Manerium iacuit; sed est intra diuisionem suam; et fuit presbyter de dominio regis. Aluuinus tenuit. In eodem hundredo habet Fulbertus, de Hugone, unum molinum, et reddit xxim solidos. Uerfridus tenet de Hugone, POLTONE. Vluuinus tenuit de rege E. *o Et pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est n carucarum. Ibi sunt hi uillani. Et cecclesiola. T.R.E. ualebat xl solidos. Et post, xv solidos. Modo, xxx solidos. IN WIWART LEST. IN BERISOVT HVNDREDO. Ipse Hugo tenet Brebvrne. Godricus de burnes tenuit de rege E. Et pro vn solins se defendebat tunc. Et modo, pro v solins et dimidio, et dimidio iugo 25 quia alia pars est extra diuisionem Hugonis, et earn tenet episcopus baiocensis. Terra est xv carucarum. In dominio sunt ii ro . Et xxxi uillanus cum x bordariis habent x carucas. Ibi ascclesia. Et vm t0 serui. Et n molini de vn solidis. Et xx aerie prati. Silua de xxv porcis. T.R.E. ualebat xx libras. Et post, vm libras. Modo, xvi libras. 30 In hundredo de CERTII tenet queedam femina de Hugone i uirgam. quam unus sochmannus tenuit de rege E. Valet hi solidos. Ipse Hugo tenet dimidium iugum in Tepindene IN BLACIIEBVRNE HVNDREDO. quod tenuit Norman de rege E. Et pro dimidio iugo se defendit. Ibi sunt ii° uillani cum dimidia caruca. Valuit semper et ualet c denarios. 35 IN LIMOWART LEST. IN ESTRAITES HVNDREDO. Ipse Hugo tenet SlBORNE. Osiar tenuit de rege E. Et pro uno solin se defendebat tunc. Et modo. Terra est n carucarum. In dominio est una. Et unus uillanus cum mi bordariis habent i carucam. Et ibi unus seraus. T.R.E. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, mi libras. 'io Isdem Hugo habet dimidium solin SVANETONE. Terra est i Caracas. Norman tenuit de rege E. Et pro tan to se defendit. Ibi mi uillani habent i carucam. Ibi silua de v porcis. T.R.E. ualebat xxv solidos. Et post, xv solidos. Modo, xxx solidos. Nigellus tenet de Plugone unum iugum. Et in Aia vn acrac. 45 Vnus sochmannus tenuit de rege E. Terra est i carucas. In dominio est dimidia caruca. Et vi bordarii. Et n serui. Et v aerie prati. T.R.E. ualebat xx solidos. Et post, x solidos. Modo, xxv solidos. Willelmus filius Grosse tenet de Hugone BONINTONE. Norman tenuit de rege E. Et pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est 50 mi carucarum. In dominio est una. Et ix uillani cum mi bordariis habent n /caracas. 54 CnENTII. Ibi jecclesia. Et vm send. Et silua vni porcorum. T.RE. ualebat mi libras. Et post, m libras. Modo, c solidos. Uerueus tenet de Hugone Obtiiepole. Alrebot tenuit de rege E. Et pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est vi canicarum. In dominio est 5 una. Et xi uillani cum n carucis. Et unus seruus. Et x acrtc prati. Et silua reddens v denarios de pasnagio T.R. T.RE. ualebat l solidos. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, mi libras. IN BLACIIEBVRNE HVNDREDO ET IN NEVCERCE HVNDREDO. Heraldus tenet dimidium solin, unam uirgam minus. 10 Sex sochmanni tenuerunt de rege E. Et pro tanto se defendit. Terra est v carucarum. In dominio sunt n”. Et xxxi bordarii habent hi carucas. Ibi unus seruus. T.RE. ualebat lx solidos. Et post, xxx solidos^ Modo, mi libras et xv solidos. Et Adhuc habet imam denam quae iacuit in Fane manerio Adam. Ibi sunt n bordarii reddentes xxx denarios. Valet et ualuit semper v solidos. is Ipse Hugo tenet dimidium solin IN BERISCOLT HVNDREDO. in HASTINGELIE. Vlnod tenuit de rege E., et pro tanto se defendit. Modo tenet quidam homo de Hugone. Et habet ibi ii bordarios red¬ dentes nn solidos. Valuit semper et ualet x solidos. /IIVNDREDO. Ipse Hugo tenet in dominio unum iugum et dimidium IN LANGEBRIGE 20 in Tevegate. God tenuit de rege E. Ibi est modo unus uillanus cum i caruca. Et ibi vm acne prati. T.RE. ualebat xx solidos. Et post, x solidos. Modo, xx solidos. In eodem Hundredo est una uirga terra; in SvESTONE, quam te¬ nuit unus sochmannus de rege E. Ibi modo est unus bordarius xn denarios 25 reddens. T.R.E. ualebat xxx denarios. Et post, xvm. Modo, m solidos. TERRA COMITIS EVSTACIIII. IN DIMIDIO LEST DE SVDTONE. IN OISTREIIAM HVNDREDO. .N. comes C omes Evstachius tenet de rege OiSTREHAM. Goduuinus tenuit de rege E. Et pro mi solins se defendebat tunc. Et modo. Terra est In dominio sunt n m caruca;. Et xt.tt uillani, cum vn bordariis, habent xxx carucas. Ibi x send. Et unus molinus de v solidis. Et xvi aerse prati. Et de silua, c porci. T.R.E. ualebat xxx libras. Quando recepit, xxrni libras. Modo xl libras. IN LEST DE WIWARLET. IN WI HVNDRET. 35 Ipse comes tenet Boltvne. Goduinus comes tenuit. Et pro vn solins se defendebat tunc. Et modo. Terra est xxxm carucarum. In dominio sunt m”. Et lxvii uillani cum v bordariis habent xxx carucas. Ibi secclesia. Et xvii serui. Et n molini de vii solidis et n denariis. Et xxvi aerse prati. Silua cc porcorum. 40 T.R.E. ualebat xx libras. Et post, xxx libras. Modo, xl libras. CHENTII. TERRA RICARDI FILTI GISLEBERTI. IN TVIFERDE HVNDREDO. R ICARDUS dc Tonebrige tenet IIallinges. Et Aldret tenuit de rege E. Et tunc, et modo, defendit se pro n solins. Terra est xvi carucarum. In dominio est una et dimidia. Et xvi uillani cum xu bordariis 5 habent vi carucas. Ibi n ascclesim. Et xv serui. Et n molini de xxv solidis. Et mi piscarise de mille et septingcntis anguillis, xx li minus. Ibi v acrse prati. Et silua cl porcorum. T.R.E., et post, ualuit xxx libras. Modo, xx libras, eo quod terra uastata est a pecunia. IN MEDESTAN HVNDREDO. 10 JLsdem Ricardus tenet Bermelinge. Alret tenuit de rege E. Et tunc, et modo, pro uno solin se defendit. Terra est mi carucarum. In dominio n carucas. Et v uillani cum vm bordariis habent v carucas. Ibi xm serui. Et unus molinus de v solidis. Et nil acne prati. Silua x porcorum. T.R.E. ualebat mi libras. Et post, c solidos. Modo, mi libras. TERRA IIAMONIS V 1 CECOMITIS. 15 IN LEST DE WIWARLET. IN WIT HVNDREDO. H aimo uicecomes tenet de rege unum Manerium, quod T.R.E. se dcfendebat pro n solins et dimidio. Et modo pro uno solin et m iugis. Terra est vm carucarum. In dominio v boues arantes. 20 Et xvi uillani cum xv bordariis habent x carucas. Ibi ascclesia. Et vii serui. Et unus molinus de ix solidis, et lx anguillis. Ibi xx acne prati. Et silua xxx porcorum. vi denarios. T.R.E. ualebat x libras. Et post, vn libras. Modo, xmi libras et vi solidos De isto Manerio tenet Hugo de montfort m a iuga et dimidium. Valet lx solidos. IN DIMIDIO LEST DE SVDTONE. IN GRENVIZ HVNDREDO. 25 Ibi habet Haimo lxiii acras terras qua; pertinent in Hulviz. Willelmus accipitrarius tenuit de rege E. Ibi sunt xi bordarii Totum ualet hi libras. reddentes xli denarios. IN LITEFEL HVNDREDO. IN LEST DE ELESFORD. Et tunc, et modo, pro ii solins se defendit. Terra est ix carucarum. In dominio sunt n®. Et xxvm uillani cum xv bordariis habent x carucas. Ibi tecclesia. Et x serui. Et u molini de x solidis. Et n® piscarne de ii solidis. Ibi xx aerie prati. Et tantum siluie unde exeunt lx porci de pasnagio. 35 T.R.E. ualebat xu libras. Et post, x libras. Modo, xix libras. IN WITESTAPLE HVNDREDO. IN LEST DE BOROWART. Ipse Haimo tenet BLEHEM. Norman tenuit de rege E. Et tunc, et modo, se defendit pro uno solin. Terra est mi carucarum. Et xii uillani habent ibi n carucas. In dominio est una caruca. Ibi mcclcsia. Et ii acne prati. 40 Et de pasnagio lx porci. Ibi una piscaria. T.R.E. ualebat vm libras. Et post, et modo, ualet vi libras. 5G CHENTH. TERRA ALBERTI CAPELLANI. IN DIMIDIO LEST DE MILDETONE. IN MILDETONE HVNDREDO. I A LBERTUS capellanus tenet de rege Newetone. /-% Sidgar tenuit de regina Eddid. Et tunc, et modo, se defendit 5 pro vn solins et dimidio. Terra est Terra qua; fuit in dominio est ad iirmam pro lx solidis. In ipso Manerio x uillani cum xlviii bordariis habent v carucas. Ibi xn aerie prati. Et nn dense de silua reddentes xxx porcos de pasnagio. Ibi una piscaria seruiens hall®. Et n serui. 10 Siluula parua ad clausuram. Ad hoc Manerium pertinent in cantuaria civitate nn hagas. Et n® in Rouecestre, quse reddebant lxiiii denarios. Et de manerio Mildentone redditur in Neuuetone una consuetudo, id est, xxvin pensce caseorum. Et de xxvni solins de Mildentone 15 pertinent in Neuuetone x libras et x solidi. Et de alia parte de nouem solins de Middeltone pertinent in Neutone xxvni pensee caseorum et dimidia. Et Lvm solidi de gablo ex his nouem solins. Et de his ix solins reddebat Sigar apud Mildetone aueram. De hoc Manerio sunt foris in denas, quse ibi fuerunt T.R.E., sicut 20 hundredum testificatur. Totum Manerium, T.R.E. ualebat xl libras. Et post, xxxvi libras. Modo, xxxim" libras. Archiepiscopus inde habet vi libras. Et episcopus baiocensis in denas habet. Valent xl solidos. de ros De terra huius Manerii tenet Goisfridus unum iugum. Et ualet x solidos. Adam filius Huberti tantum siluse unde exeunt xl denarii per annum. CONCORDANCE The following Concordance lias been compiled, not merely for the purpose of furnishing a Verbal Index to the Domesday Book of Kent, but also as a means of elucidating the peculiar Terms of the Record, by bringing them together in juxtaposition with their respective contexts; thence it is, that in cases where the Text seems peculiarly adapted to explain the meaning of particular Words, a more than usual proportion of it is inserted. These remarks particularly apply to “ Burgenses,” “ Burgum,” the terms “Villani,” “ Bordarii,” “ Cotarii,” and the abbreviation “ Car.” In these latter instances the plan adopted is, to use “ Car.” as a title in its unextended form, and then to append, as concisely as possible, the entire statistical record of the Manor, viz. the number of Solins, etc. at which it was assessed, the number of Teams it was capable of bearing, the quantity in Demesne, the number of Teams supplied by the “Villani,” “Bordarii,” and “Cotarii,” etc., and occasionally the “ Servi,” when necessary to indicate the husbandry strength of the Manor. By this arrangement we have in juxtaposition before us, all the fonns in which these different classes are named in the Census; we are enabled thereby to dismiss at once many erroneous impressions as to their respective positions in the Manor; and if we do not obtain a complete elucidation of this vexed question, we make very great advances towards it. It is not improbable that these, and many other doubtful points in Domesday Book, will not be completely solved till a Concordance of the entire Record, or something like this system, has been accomplished. In those manors, however, where “ Bordarii” or “Villani” are named without “ Car.” they are entered under them proper heads. With regard to the entries under the Head “Valeo,” it is to be observed that we have generally quoted the entire Text, in order to show; under one view, the comparative value of the Manors at the different periods that are cited in the Record. In further explanation of this Concordance, it must be noted that care has been taken to introduce every word of the original Record, those only excepted that are of incessant recurrence, such as “ habet,” “ tenet,” “ defendit,” etc., and others which, like them, could not, by any the remotest possibility, require elucidation from their immediate context. Even these words, however, are inserted, when they appear in any other position than that of mere constantly-recurring formula3. For instance, where we find “habet” used in passages in which we should expect to see “ tenet,” we insert it, as possibly involving a question whether it intimates mere tenure in fee, or only occupancy of land under some chief or mesne lord. So with regard to “ tenet,” it sometimes appears in reference to a subordinate Tenant for the time being paying certain rents, observing certain customs, or testifying to them. In these cases we admit the word “tenet” into our Concordance, but not when it only records, in necessarily-constant recurrence, the holding of the Tenant-in-Chief, or of the Mesne Tenant of the manor. With regard to “ defendit ” or “defendebat,” it would have been a useless waste of space to introduce them where they follow “Pro ii Solinis,” “Pro ii Jugis,” “Pro iii Solinis, T.R.E.,” etc., as a component part of the sentence. The Names of Persons and Places are reserved for separate Indices at the end of the volume. It remains only to observe, that for the title of each entry the word is given in the case and tense in which the searcher would expect to find it in an ordinary dictionary. To have assigned a distinct heading for each inflection would only have caused perplexity: we have therefore followed the plan universally adopted by Lexicographers,—one which will be perfectly intelligible to the scholar, who will rarely be at a loss to supply the requisite inflection; and in doubtful cases a reference to the extension will remove all possibility of error. For words of incessan't recurrence, their initial letter is used, by which they will be easily recognized. It is hoped that economy of space will be deemed a sufficient justification of the adoption of this course. A list of these abbreviations is subjoined:— B. for Bordarius. D. for Dominium, dim. for dimidium. J. for Jugum. M. for Manerium. S. for Solinum. S cns A. for Sanctus Augustinus, gcus jyp f or Sanctus Martinus. S“ T. for Sancta Trinitas. V. for Villanus:—and their respective in¬ flections. N.B.—The small letter in italic represents the word that is the subject of the entry. 58 CONCORDANCE. ABB ABBATIA. De Batailge.—7, ( 55. De Gand.—7, ( 50. S ci Augustini. —7, ( 56. ABEO. Si a. domum.—3, ( 8. Ubicunque a. —6, ( 39. ABLATUM. ABSTULIT. ACCIPIO. ’ Prmpositus a. emendationem.—2, ( 15. Emendam a. ad opus regis.—6, ( 40. Recognovit se injuste a. —6, ( 45. ACCIPITKARIUS. WiUelmus a. tenuit.—55, ( 27. ACQUIETO, ADQUIETO. Quia xxiiii solini base omnia a. —7,(33. o acrm quas se a. ubi T.E.E. se a. —7, ( 34. Quie a. se ubi et superiors.—7, ( 36. ACRA (v. etiam Pasture,Pratum, et Terra). Dim. S. et adliuc xxv a. —5, ( 5. Habet qtiater xx et v a.—5, ( 7. De liac prebenda suinpsit viii a. —5, ( 9. Dedit 1 a. ad Delam, et alias 1 a. apud gcam Margaritam.—5, ( 13. Hie o a. erant dc prebendis,—5, (15. Dim. S. et xii a. Et dim. S. xii a. mi¬ nus.—5, (17. Mille a. silvm infructuosrc.—6, (11. Ununi S. et xvi a. —7, ( 2. ccce a. et dim., quas fiunt ii solinos et dim.—7, ( 31. Ad Ripam sunt c a.—7, ( 34. Apud Nordeude sunt 1 a. et c apud Brand.—7, ( 35. Tres S., et i J., et xii a. terrm.—12,(28. Uuum J. et v a.—19, ( 14. xvi a. silvm minute.—36, ( 11. Tenet dim. S. et xl a.—36, ( 32. x a. quie jacent, juxta civitatem.—39,(7. c a. silv* minute.—40, ( 28. xii a. terras quie valent per annum iiii solidos.—41, ( 32. Tenuit xx a. de alodio suo.—42, ( 42. Tenuit ii a. in alodium.—12, ( -17. Tenent i J. et v a. —43, ( 20. Uno soliu, et uuo J., et x a. —44,(12. Pro iii J. et xii a. se defendit.—44,(17. Tenet i J. et x a. —44, ( 34. Tenent de episcopo xv a.—44, ( 36. iii S., lx a. minus.—48, (14. Et in Aia vii a. —53, ( 44. ADHUC. Et a. xxv acres.—5, ( 5. Et a. sunt, ccxii Burgenses.—6, ( 7. o. tantum prati.—8, i 17. a. suut ablate.—8, l 26. Sunt a. ibi iii tecclesiolas.—8, ( 30. Habuit et habet a.—21, ( 25. Sunt a. xxx aerte teme.—34, ( 26. a. jacet ad hunc M.—35, ( 52. a. habet ii J.—47, ( 49. Et a. habet unam denarn.—54, (13. ADJACEO. Huic M. a. dim. S.—17, ( 23. Huic M. a. iii mansiones teme.—30,(3. Huic M. a. iiii hagse.—33, ( 14. a. Neventone M.—44, ( 3. ADJUTOR. Et unum alium a. —2, (12. ADULTERIUM. Dc a. vero.—3, ( 30. ADVENTUS. Primo a. ejus in Angliam.—2, ( 20. rECCLESIA. Hum juste pertinent uni re. —6, ( 23. Quod ipste re. suas consuetudines quie- tas lmbuerint R.E. tempore. Et ex- inde utrteque re. in sua terra habuc- runt consuetudines suas.—6, ( 45. Et m. (in Acres). —45, ( 27. Ibi (Aldintone) re. —14, ( 6. Ibi (Alham) re. —37, ( 4. Ibi (Alnoitone) re. —29, l 50. Ibi (Apeldr.es) re. —19, ( 35. Ibi (Audintone) re. —29, ( 41. Ibi (Badlesmere) re .—39, (13. Terra re. de la Batailge.— 45, ( 36. Una re. (in Benindene). —42, ( 8. Ibi (Berham) re. —37, ( 37- Ibi (Berlinge) re. —28, ( 35. jECC Ibi (Bilsvitone) re. —41, ( 40. Ibi (Bix) re.— 10, (42. Ibi (Blachemenestone) re. —51, ( 3. Ibi (Bleiieii) re.— 55, ( 39. Et una re. (in Bocheland) —5, ( 42. Ibi (Bogelei) 30, ( 22. Et (in Bogelei, v. Merlea) re .—30, (25. Ibi (Boltone) re. —15, ( 40. Ibi (Boltone) re.— 31, ( 3. Ibi (Boltone) re. —54, ( 37. Ibi (Bonintone) re. —54, ( 1. Ibi (Borham) re. —28, ( 42. Ibi (Borne) re.— 35, (18. Ibi (Breburne) re.— 53, ( 27. Ibi (Briestede) re.— 15, ( 25. Ibi (Broteiiam) re. —11, ( 22. Ibi (Burnes) re. —13, ( 12. Ibi (Burnes) re. —35, ( 32. Monaelius re. CantuariensIS.— 6, (17. Ibi (Celca) re .—33, ( 51. Ibi (Certeham) re. —18, ( 28. Ibi (Certh) re. —30, ( 12. Ibi (Ceteham) re.— 32, ( 5. Ibi (Chenetone) re. —49, ( 27. Ibi (Cilleham) re.— 38, ( 27. Ibi (Cistelet) re. de xii solidis.—47, ( 8. Ibi (Clive) re.— 17, ( 44. Ibi (Coclestane) re. —21, ( 4. Ibi (Code ham) re.— 26, ( 10. Ibi (Craie) re. —25, ( 14. Ibi (Danetone) re. —45, (12. Ibi (Danitone) re. —21, ( 8. Ibi (Dictune) re. —26, ( 44. Ibi (Dodeuam) m. —40, (17.' Tres re. apud Doueram reddunt xxxvi solidos, et viii denarios.—7, ( 22. Ibi (Eddintone) re. —27, ( 47- Ibi (Elenton) re.— 26, ( 3S. Ibi (Elesford) ii re. —15, (12. Ibi (Erhede) 11, ( 1. Tbi (Esledes) re. —29, ( 32. Ibi (Eslinges) re. —40, ( 6. Ibi (Eslinges) re —40, (12. Ibi (Esnoiland) re. —20, ( 48. Ibi (Essetesfoud) re. Et presbyter.— 50, ( 26. Ibi (Estanes) re .—20, (11. lln (Estbrige) ii re. —50, ( 45. Ibi (Estoches) re. —21, ( 31. Ibi (Estotinghes) re. —14, ( 29. Ibi (Estraites) re.— 52, ( 37. Ibi (Esturai) as. —46, ( 44. Ibi (Estursete) re. —12, ( 47. Ibi (Etwelle) re. —53, ( 5. Ibi (Faohesham) re. —20, ( 19. Et (in Fanne) re. —10, ( 32. Ibi (Ferlaga) re. —17, ( 33. Ibi (Ferlaga) re. —32, ( 49. Ibi (Frandesberie) re. —21, ( 17. Ibi (Fredenestede) re. —29, ( 28. Ibi (Fulchestan) v re. de quibus ha¬ bet arcliiepiscopus lv solidos.—36, ( 20. Ibi (in Fulchestan) iii at. —36, ( 26. Ibi (Uecham) re. —IS, ( 5. Ibi (Gelingeham) re .—12, ( 4. Ibi (Godeselle) re. —31, l 8. Ibi (Gomersham) re .—18, l 34. Ibi (Gravesiiam) re.— 28, (17. Ibi (Hallinges) re. —21, (12. Ibi (Hallinges) ii re. —55, ( 5. Ibi (Hardes) re. —35, ( 24. Ibi (Hardes) re. —35, ( 40. Ibi (Hariardesham) re. —29, (15. Ibi (Haslow) re. —29, ( 4. Ibi (IIecham) re.— 34, ( 11. Ibi (Hoilinge'borde) re. —17, ( 21. Ibi (Houtone) re. —52, ( 11. Ibi (Hortune) re. est.—24, ( 2. Ibi (llov) vi re.— 32, ( 26. Ibi (Languelei) re. —30, ( 30. Ibi (Ledesdune) re. —28, l 10. Ibi (Leleburne) re. —26, ( 30. Ibi (Leminges) re. —14, ( 34. Ibi (in terra trium hominura archiepis- eopi, in Leminges) ii re .—14, (41. Ibi (Liteburne) re.— 46, ( 32. Ibi (Marourde) re. —55, ( 32. Ibi (Meddestane) re.— 11, ( 38. Ibi (Meletune) re. —28, ( 4. Ibi (Mellingetes) as .—20, ( 38. Ibi (Mepeham) re.— 17, ( 27. iECC Ibi (Merlea, in Bogelei) re. —30, ( Ibi (Merseham) re. —13, ( 50. Ibi (Metlinges) re. —11, ( 8. at. et deeimas hujus M. (Middeltune) tenet abbas S ci A.—9, ( 16. Ibi (Midelea) re. —44, ( 19. Ibi (Monocstune) ii re. —17, ( 50. Ibi (Mundingeiiam) re. —48, ( 33. Ibi (Nedestede) re. —33, ( 4. Ibi (Neventone) re. —53, ( 9. Ibi (Norfluet) re. —11, (14. Ibi (Nortone) re. —12, ( 23. Ibi (in terra quain de Nortone tenet Vi tabs) est tc.— 12, ( 30. Ibi (Nortone) iii at. —38, ( 21. Et (in Notestede) re .—28, ( 22. Ibi (Oldeham) re. —20, ( 34. Ibi (Olecumbe) at. —15, ( 33. Ibi (Ore) dim. re. —38, (11. Ibi (in Ore) re. est.—39, ( 38. Ibi (Orlavestone) ii at. —52, ( 22. Ibi (Orpintun) ii at. —17, ( 7. Ibi (Ospringes) re. —38, ( 36. Ibi (Oteham) <*.—31, ( 23. Ibi (Otringeberge) re. —33, (11. Ibi (Palestrei) re. —41, ( 28. Ibi (Pecheham) re. —17, ( 11. Ibi (Pellesorde) re. —27, (16. Ibi (Piteham) ii re. —12, ( 35. Ibi (Piventone) re. —41, (11. Ibi (Prestetone) re. —18, ( 23. Ibi (Riesce) re.— 27, ( 22. Ibi (Roculf) a. —12, (15. Inde est saisita Rofensis re. —21, (39. Ibi (Salteode) re. —16, ( 20. Terra re. S li Augustini.— 46, ( 1. Ibi (S™ Mildred.e Tanet) re. et i presbyter qui dat xx solidos per an¬ num.—46, ( 50. Terra re. S d T. et S ci A.—6, ( 32. Ibi (Sedlinges) ii re. —52, ( 4. Ibi (Seivetone) re. Et presbyter.—50, ( 14. Ibi (Sentlinge) re.— 26, (19. Ibi (Seseltrf.) at.— IS, ( 18. Ibi (Setlinges) re. —47, (41. Ibi (SiberteswaM) re.— 48, ( 40. Ibi (Sondresse) re. —10, ( 36. Ibi (Stanefelle) re. —38, (16. Ibi (Stellinges) at. —35, ( 28. Ibi (Stochingeberge) re. —29, ( 46. Ibi (Sudfleta) at. —20, ( 5. Ibi (Sudtone) re. —30, ( 7. Ibi (Sudtone) re .—30, (17. Ibi (Tanet S u, ° Mildred,®) at. et i presbyter qui dat xx solidos per an¬ num.—46, l 50. Ibi (Tangas) re. —35, ( 10. re. hujus M. (Tarf.ntefort) tenet... et valet lx solidos.—8, ( 29. Ibi (Tintentone) re. —51, ( 46. Et (in Tjvedele) re. —29, (11. Ibi (Totesolive) re. —20, ( 43. Ibi (Trevelai) re. —39, ( 42. Ibi (Turneham) re. —31, ( 40. Ibi (unum maneriuin archiepiscopi in hundredo de Wi) re. —19, ( 41. Ibi (Wi) re.— 45, ( 40. Et una (in Wicheham) re. —25, ( 2. Ibi (Wicheham) re. Et i presbyter qui dat xl solidos per annum.—35, (45. Et (in Winchelesmere) re. —31, (13. Ibi (in Wit hundredo) at. —55, ( 20. 2ECCLESIOLA. Extra hanc (ajcclesiain) sunt adhuc ibi (Tarentefort) iii re. —8, ( 30. Ibi (Postinges) ii re. —51, (17. Ibi (Poltone) a?.—53, ( 20. ALIUS. Unum a. adjutorem.—2, ( 12. De a. forisfacturis.—3, (13. Et a. Bocheland.—3, ( 25. De hac forisfaetura et de a .—3, ( 41. a, 1 acres.—5, ( 14. De xxxii a. qui fuerant.—6, ( 5. a. intra civitatem.—6, (16. Tenet alius xi masuras.—6, ( 29. Cum a. S. in consuetudine.—9, ( 7. Musurae a. sunt destructe.—12, (49. Et a. v teigni.—44, (16. Tenet a. partem.-—45, ( 32. Jacet in a. hundredo.—46, ( 23. ALI Et ii V. a. (medietatem)—50, ( 3. a. (S.) est extra divisionem.—53, ( 8. a. pars est extra divisionem.—53, ( 25. Et de a. parte de noveui S.—56, (15. ALLEGES. Reddebat xl milia de a. ad victnm mo- nnchorum.—10, (11. Reddidit a. sieut prius.—10, ( 12. Dim. piscaria de ccc a. —40, (18. ALNETUM. Ablatum est unum a. —8, (16. Et unum a. —40, ( 37. ALODIA, ALODIUM. Tenebant Burgenses in a. dc Rege.— 6, ( 23. Tenuit xx acres de a. suo.—42, ( 42. Tenuit de rege E. ii acres in a. ; et te¬ nuit eas de Ansfrido.—42, ( 48. Godessa tenuit in a. —49, (10. Vluuile Wilde earn tenuit in a. T.R.E. —50, ( 39. ALODIARIUS. Has forisfacturas habet Rex super oin- nes a. totius comitatus, et super ho¬ mines ipsorum.—3, (15. Quando moritur a., Rex inde habet re- levationem terras, excepta, etc.—3, l 17. AMITTO. Quando vicecomitatuin a. —8, ( 23. ANCILLA. Habens viii inter servos et a. —22, 1 38. ANGLI. Appreciatur ab a. lx libris.—8, ( 10. ANGUILLA. ii caretas et ii sticas a. —3, (45. ii Piscarise de cclxx a. —11, ( 39. ii Piscarias et dim. de clxxx a. —11, ( 44. i Piscaria thsxl a. —14, (35. vi piscarias de mee a. —17, ( 34. Una piscaria de eel a.- —18, ( 24. i moliuus de xv solidis et cl a. —23, (18. i piscaria de quater xx a. et x.—25, ( 7- i molinus de x solidis et cccxxx a. et piscaria de lx a. —28, ( 36. Et piscaria de xxx a. —33, ( 12. Reddens ccc a. et ii solidos.—45, ( 49. iiii piscarias de mille et septingentis a. xx minus.—55, ( 6. i molinus de ix solidis et lx a. —55, (21. ANIMALIA. Et pasture 1 a. —28, ( 37. ii V. cum i B. habent ii a.— 31, ( 28. Pasture ad ccc oves et ad xxxi a. —35, ( 48. ANNOTOR. Hie a. tenentes terras.—7, (49. ANNUO. Hoc non a. monachi.—39, (17. a. rege W.—47, ( 16. ANNUS. Una vice in a. —2, ( 6. Singulis a .—7, ( 29, 38, et 41. lleddit xvi denarios per a. —9, (13. In a. quo facta est ham descriptio.— 10 , ( 11 . Habent omni a. xx solidos.—11, ( 48. Habent viii solidos per a. —12, ( 42. Valet ei per a. x solidos.—19, (46. Per a. reddunt xi libras.—21, ( 28. Valentes per a. v solidos.—22, ( 8. Reddunt v solidos per a. —30, ( 4. Dat xl solidos per a. —35, ( 45. Valent per a. iiii solidos.—41, ( 32. Valet per a. iiii solidos.—44, ( 7. Dat xx solidos per a. —47, (1. Quod valet per a. xii libras.— 47, (12. Quos persolvit in a. —48, (17. Nisi xxx solidos per a. —48, (37. c denarios per a. —49, ( 9. xxv denarios unoquoque a. —49, (11. Unde exeunt xl denarii per a. —56, ( 24. ANTECESSOR. a. ejus tenuit in prebenda.—5, ( 26. ANTEQUAM. a. rex dedisset.—10, ( 8. APP11ECIOR (v. etiam Valeo). Modo a. xl libris.—2, ( 23. Modo 1 libris a. —6, l 13. Modo a. xii libris.—7, ( 26. Modo a. ab Anglis lx libris.—8, (10. CONCORDANCE. 59 APP Tantum terras quod a. vii libris.—8, 7 39. Modo a dominium lx libris.—10, 7 31. Quod tenet a. x libris.—10, 7 32. a. D. archiepiscopi xxiiii libris. Mili- tura xi libris.—11, 7 33. Quod teuet ti. xv libris.—11, 7 34. Modo a. xxxiiii libris.—13, 7 28. Quod Willelmus tenet, a. xl solidis.— 18, 7 50. Quod a. xx solidis.—20, 7 8. Totum manerium a. iiii libris.—22, 7 23. a. xx solidis.—22, 7 42. Totum M. a. vii libris. Modo, simili¬ ter.—22, 7 42. Quod tenet xl solidis a. —22, 7 43. ii denas quae a. viii solidis.—22, 7 44. Quod teuet a. vi libris.—25, 710. Modo a. xii libris.—25, 7 28. Quod a. vii solidis.—42, 7 32. Et a. vi solidis.—42, 7 48. xx libris plus a. —45, 7 45. Tamen a. xl solidos.—48, 7 47. lime terra a. in TitentoneJ—50, 7 35. APP11EHENSUS. Si abierit domum non a. —3, 7 8. AQUA. Fecit domum super a. regis.—2, 7 40. ARBOR. Aut a. prostraverit.—3, 7 5. ARCHIDIACONUS. Tenet Anschitil a. i solin.—5, 7 11. Et a. xx solidos.—12, 7 26. ARCHIEPISCOPATUS. Non era® de a., sed fuit de dominica firma regis E.—37, 7 50. ARGENTUM. Una marka a. —40, 7 27. ARO. Pastnra unde a. extvanei homines vi acras terras.—35, 7 20. Quia illuc a. est cum dominicis carrucis. —50, 7 35. ARPENDI et ARPENNI. Ibi ii a. vineic.—29, 7 32. Ibi iii a. vine®.—30, 713. Ibi sunt iii a. vine®.-—47, 711. ARSA (v. etiam IGNIS). xxx libras a. et pensatas.—6,714. ASSIDUUS. Manens in villa a. —2, 717. iii (teigni) manebant ibi a. —43, 7 31. ATTESTOR. hundredam a. ei.—39, 716. AUFERO, ABLATUM, ABSTULIT, Quidam monachus a. —6,717. a. eis unum pratiun.—7, 7 40. a. eis, singulis annis.—-7, 7 41. Alnod did a. Merclesham.—7, 7 45. De isto M. a. est unum pratuin, etc.— 8, 716. De isto M. a. est.—8, 7 21. De eodem M. adlme sunt a. —8, 7 26. Aluold cild per vim a. —9, 7 15. Nee a. suut.—32, 7 31. Quos a. villanis regis.—35, 714. Arehiepiscopus a. ei servitiura.—47 7 23. AULA (v. etiam Halla et Ilaida). Sine a. et dominiis.—42. 7 12. AURUM. Dedit markam a. —7, 7 42. xxiiii libras et uneimn a.—20, 7 7. xx libras et i uuciam a. —20,715. AVERA. Reddunt pro Inewardo et a. —9, 7 3. De a., id est servitium, lx solidi.—37- 7 39. De bis ix S. reddebat apud Mildetone а. — 56, 7 18. AVUNCULUS. Coueessit fieri a. pro suo.—2, 7 46. BARONES REGIS. Judieio 5. r. qui placitum tenuerunt.— б, 7 47. BEREWICIIA. De isto M. dedit episcopus unam h. Ilerbertin filio Iuonis, qu44. Extra d. Hugonis.—42, 716. Hugo tenet extra d. suam.—44,7 2. Quod habet intra d. suum.—44, 7 3. Tenet aliam partem intra d. suam.—45, 7 32. hi J. infra d. Hugonis, et quartum J. est extra.—50, 7 3. Extra d. sunt.—51, 7 21. Quia foris d. est.—51, 7 44. Tenet extra d. Hugonis.—52, 7 49. xiiii acras infra suam d. —52, 7 50. Quia alius est extra d .—53, 7 8. Quod habet Hugo intra d. suam.—53, 7 12. Intra d. lianc est.—53,7 13. Sed est intra d. suam.—53, 716. Alia pars est extra d. —53, 7 25. DO. Burgenses d. xx naves.—2, 7 6. d. pro caballo transducendo.—2, 7 9. d. Alan clerico suo.—5, 7 9. Huic d. episcopus 1 acras.— 5, 713. d. niarkam auri pro moHuo eorum.—7, 7 42. d. iniquam commutationem.—7, 7 46. Vicecomiti d. pnepositus.—9,712. Antequam rex d. ilium.—10, 7 8. Q.ui d. xl solidos per annum.—35, 7 45. Terr® qu® d. est ab his sohus ad firmara. —36, 7 43. d. episcopus unam berewieham.—37, 7 41. De eodem manerio d. i S. et ii molinos. —37, 7 44. Postquam d. manerium.—40, 710. d. cuidatn suo fratri.—45, 7 22. d. ei episcopus Baiocensis.—46, 7 36. Qui d. xx solidos per annum.-—47, 7 1. Qu® de suo D. d. ei abbas.—47, 7 49. d. inde xxv denarios.—49, 710. DOMINICUS. Fuit de d. firma regis E.—37, 7 50. A rata est cum d. carrucis.—50, 7 35. DOMINIUM (v. etiam sub Car.). Tenet in o'.—10, 7 16, 7 23.—11, 7 6 et 7 12.—12,7 20 et 7 44.—13, 7 10, 7 16, 7 23, 7 29, 7 35, et 7 48.—14, 7 3, 7 22, et 7 32.-32, 7 23.-35, 7 22, 7 26, 7 30, et 7 43.-37, 7 2.— 41, 7 39.—50, 7 41.—54, 7 19. Appreciatur d. arckiepiscopi lx libris. Teignorum xii libris. 10, 7 31. Appreeiatm - d. archiepiscopi xxiiii H- bris. Militum xi libris.—11, 7 32. d. archiepiscopi valet xx libras. Mili- tum, xv libras et x solidos.—11,7 47. Pertinet ad d. monaehorum.—19, 7 47. In d. nichil est.—26, 7 4.—27, 7 7.— 31, 7 2.-34,7 43. In d. nichil est nisi i B.—35, 7 27. Modo, quod habet in d. valet c libras. —36, 7 49. Sine aulis et d. —42, 712. In d. nichil modo.—44, 7 12. ii J. qu® de suo d. dedit ei abbas.—47, 7 49. Dim. S. de d. monaehorum.—49, 7 8. Et fuit de d. regis.—53, 7 17. Terra qu® fuit in d. est ad finnam.— 56, 7 6. DOMINUS. Erga d. cujus homo fuerit.—3, 7 13. Yalent d. vi libras.—14, 7 20. Neque potuit habere d. prater regem. —22, 7 9. DOMUS. Hugo de Montfort i d .—2, 7 31. De his d. revocant.—2, 7 33. Fecit quandam d. —2, 7 39. Nec d. fuit ibi T.R.E.—2, 7 41. Si abierit d. —3,7 8. Duas d. duorum Burgensium.— 6, 7 16. Has d. et lianc terrain tenet.—6, 7 21. Ilabuit episcopus iii d. de xxxi dena¬ riis.-27, 7 11. Intra civitatem Rouecestre, iiii d. ad hoc M. (Ledesdune) pertinentes.—28, 7 13. CONCORDANCE. G4 DOM In Rouecestre i d. reddens (ad M. Ofe- ham) xxx denarios.—28, 7 28. Episcopus de Rouecestre habet domes de hoc M. (Borham).—28, 7 45. Una d. reddens xxv denarios.—30, / 50. T.R.E. in Cantuaria iii d. pertinebant huic M. (Winehelesmere).—31,713. ix d. in Rouecestre vi solidos reddebant (M. Ilov).—32, 7 30. Habet de episcopo iiii d. —36, 7 4. DONUM. Pro novo d. episcopi.—23, 719. Pro novo d. episcopi.—23, 7 42. Pro novo d. episcopi.—24, 7 3. Pro novo d. episcopi.—26, 7 34. Pro novo d. episcopi.—27, 7 11. De novo d. episcopi.—27, 7 39. De novo d. episcopi.—27, 7 43. De novo d. episcopi.—34, 7 2, et 44, 7 22. ELEMOSINA. Reddunt xx solidos, etc., ad S m M. in e—7,7 17. Tenent iiii moniales in e . de abbate.— 47, 7 27. Dedit inde xxv denarios in e. unoquoque anno.—49, 7 11. EMENDA. Et e. accipiet ad opus regis.—6, 7 40. EMENDATIO. Prapositus accipiebat comniunem e. — 2, 715. EMENDO. Et c solidis e . —3, 7 9. viii libris regi e . —3, 7 11. Per c solidos e. —3, 714. Gribrige qu® viii libris e. —3, 7 42. Quicunque forisfecerit, regi e. — 6, 735. EMO. Goduinus Comes T.R.E. e. illud.—21, 7 35. EPISCOPATUS. Hoc M. fuit et est de e . Rofensi.—21, 7 34. ERGA. Quietus . fixerit.—6, 7 39. PABAGIUM. Tenuerimt ii homines in p. —27, 7 3. Tenebant ii solins in —43, 7 31. PABCUS. Pro excambio p. episcopi Baiocensis.— 29, 7 37. Et (in Ceiitii) p. silvaticarum bestia- rum.—30, 7 13. Ibi (Wicheham) unus p. —35, 7 46. De hoc M. (Liteburne) episcopus Bai¬ ocensis habet in suo —46, 7 35. Abbas tenet Wakwintone, et dedit ei episcopus pro excambio p. sui.—46, 7 37. PARS. Habebat rex E. duas p. —2, 7 3. Duas p. cuidam V. abstulit.—9, 7 15. PAR Tenet aliam p. intra divisionein suam. —45, 7 82. Duas p. unius S.—45, 7 47. Hujus burgi duas p. —47, 714. Terciam p. qua; fuerat Goduini.—47,7 15. p. abbatis, xxvi libras.—48, 7 34. Tertia p. non® salime.—50, 7 44. Sextam p. unius J.—51, 7 12. De alia p. de novein S.—56, 7 15. PAltUM. p. valebat.—22, 7 23. PABVUS. viii dense p. —8, 7 8. Una p. dena si 1 vie.—12, 7 30. Et;;. silva.—14, 714. p. burgum Seseltke. —18, 7 15. Ibi p. nemus.— 36, 7 8. Et p. silvula.—44, 7 28. p. burgum quod vocatur Forewic. — 47.7 13. Ibi p. silvula.—48, 7 50. Silvula;;. ad clausuram.—56, 710. PASNAGIUM. De p. cl porci.—37, 7 40. Silva ccc poreorum de p. —45, 7 41. Silva v poreorum de p. —46, 7 6. D ep. xxx porci.—46, 7 45. D ep. exxx porci.—47, 7 10. v porci de p. silva;.—47, 7 32. Unde exeunt de p. xl porci.—49,7 30. De silva, 1 porci de p. —49, 7 45. Silva de iii porcis de p. —50, 7 45. Reddens v denarios de p .—54, 7 6. Unde exeunt lx porci de p .—55, 7 34. De p. lx porci.—55, 7 40. iii deme de silva reddentes xxx porcos de ;;.—56, 7 9. PASTURA. De p. Medrecliue.—7, 7 23. Una p. in Sibertesuualt.—7, 7 24. Apud Scortebroc unit;).—7, 7 28. p. xl acra;.—8, 7 7. De p. xiii solidi et iiii denarii.—9, 7 2. De p. silva; xxxi solidi et ii denarii.— 9, 7 22. Et vi acrae;;.—22, 7 48. p. c ovibus.—23, 7 36. Et iii acre; 25, 714. Et xl acra; 25, 7 25. Et xx acne p .—26,7 19. Et xxxv aerie 26, 7 45. Et xxx acne p.— 27, 7 2. Et i acra p.— 27, 7 17. Et p. 1 animalibus.—28, 7 37. Et p. de xv solidis.—31, 7 34. Et viii acra; 31, 7 50. Et lx acne 32, 717. In Exesse, p. cc ovibus.—34, 712. Et p. c ovium.—34, 7 36. p. unde araverunt extranei homines vi acres terne.—35, 719. De p. xl denarii.—35, 7 34. p. ad ccc oves, et ad xxxi animalia.— 35, 7 48. Parvum nemus de xii acris p. —36, 7 8. Et p. de xviii solidis et vii denariis.— 38, 7 28. Inter silvam et p. —40, 7 49. PATER. p. ejusdem tenuit in prebenda.—4, 7 35. p. hujus tenuit in prebenda.—4, 7 42. p. ipsius tenuit in prebenda.—5, 7 32. p. ejus tenuit.—5, 7 46. p. suum se posse vertere.—39, 7 17. PAULULUM. p. terra;.—7, 713. PAUPERCULA. Ibi una p. mulier reddens iii denarios et i obolum.—37, 7 16. PAX. Treuna i.e. p. regis.—2, 7 14. iii forisfacturas, pace/ii f/'act am, etc.— 16.7 31. Pi'ieter pacem iiifractam. —41, 7 53. Quando /;. est in terra.—47, 7 5. PECUNIA. De p. ejus conducebatur.—2, 7 13. Medietatem p. ejus.—3, 7 34. Terra vastata est a p. —55, 7 9. PENES. Omnes p. naves.—2, 7 42. PENSA (v. etiam PENSATA). cxl libras ad ignem et ad p. —9, 711. PEN Consuetudo, id est xxviii p. caseorum. —56, 7 14. xxviii ja. caseorum et dim.—56, 716. PENSATA (v. etiam PENSA). xxx libras arsas et p. —6, 7 14. Ixx libras p. —8, 7 12. PERDO. Rex p. consuetudinem.—2, 7 26. PERDONO. Eis p. sacam et socam.—2,7 8. PERMANEO. It p. et post mortem R.E.—8, 7 24. PERSOLVO. Quos p. in anno.—48,717. PERTICA. Unam leugam, iii p. et iii pedes.—6, 7 37. PERTINEO. Ad hanc terrain;;. xxv acne.—4, 7 30. Qua; juste;;, uni Eccclesise.—6, 7 24. Tantum prati quantum p. ad xx acres terne.—S, 7 17. In Cantuaria iii liaga; ad hoc M.—9, 7 24. Ad hoe M. p. v burgenses.—10, 7 19. Ad hoc M. p. Iii masune.—12, 7 48. p. ad Estursete.—14,711. Ad hanc terrain p. vii Burgenses in Cantuaria.—14, 713. In Romenel sunt lxxxv Burgenses qui p. ad Aldinton.—14, 7 19. Ibi p. vi burgenses in Hede.— 14,7 36. Ad hoc M. p. ccxxv Burgenses in burgo Hedffi.—16, 7 22. Ad hoc M. p. xxi burgenses.—16, 7 34. Non p. M. nisi de scoto.—17,7 14. Huic M. p. c burgenses iii miuus.—18, 7 12. p. coquina; Arcliiepiscopi.—18, 716. p. ad D. monachorum.—19, 7 47. lxxx mansuras terne que;;. ad Frandes- berie, etc.—21, 7 26. Nec p. ad illud M.— 22, 7 9. iiii domos ad hoc M. p. —28,714. Huic M. p. ii mansure.—30, 7 37. Huic M. p. in Cantuaria, T.R.E., i do- mus.—30, 7 49. iii domus p. huic M.—31, 714. Huic M. p. quiedamlibera terra.—31,7 36. Huic M. p. ix domus.—32, 7 30. Una liida qua; ad hoc M. p. —34, 7 6. p. in Cantuaria iii masune.—35, 7 50. xiii masune^. huic M.—38, 7 29. Huic M. p. i masura.—38, 7 44. Non p. ulli M.—42, 7 44. xxxii masnras ad hoc M. p. —43, 7 27. Isti M. p. saea ct soca.—45, 7 50. Omnia forislactura qua; juste regi.— 45, 7 51. Quod p. isti M.—46, 7 24. Burgenses huic M. p. —46, 7 25. Ixiii acres terra; quie p. in IIulvig. — 55, 7 26. Ad hoc M. p. in Cantuaria iiii hag® et ii in Rouecestre.—56, 7 11. De xxviii S. de Mildentone,/). in Neuue- tone x librae et x solidi.—56, 7 15. De alia parte de novem S. de Middel- tone, p. in Neutone xxviii pensai caseorum et dim.—56, 7 16. PES. iii perticas et iii p. —6, 7 37. PISCARIA. Aufert unam p. —7, 7 42. Ibi xxxii p. de xxii solidis et viii deua- riis.—9, 7 1. i molinus de x solidis cum una ;;.—11, 7 15. Ibi ii;;. de cclxx anguillis.—11, 7 39. ii p. et dim. de clxxx anguillis.—11, 7 44. iii p. de xiii solidis et viii denariis.— 12, 7 5. Et una p. —12, 716. Et p. de x denariis.—13, 7 19. Et unam 13, 7 42. iii jo. de xxi denariis.—14, 7 7. i;;. de xl anguillis.—14, 7 35. Et unam p.— 15, 7 16. vi p. de mcc anguillis.—17, 7 34. Ibi nova;;.—17, 7 50. viii p. cum gablo, de xxv solidis.—18, 7 18. PIS Una/), de ccl anguillis.—18, Z 23. vi p. de iii solidis et iiii denariis.—19, Z 35. Et una p. de iii solidis et iiii denariis. —20, Z 12. Et i p. —20, Z 33. Et v p. de xxx denariis, et sexta quae servit ad hallam.—22, Z 13. Et iii p. de iiii solidis.—21, Z18. i p. de xc anguillis.—25, Z 7. Et/). de lx anguillis.—28, Z 37. Et xii /). de vii solidis et vi denariis.— 29, Z 5. Et p. vi de xii denariis.—32, Z 6. Ibi ip. de ii solidis.—32, / 21. Et ii/). de v solidis.—32, / 39. Dim./), sine censu.—32, Z 43. Et p. de ii solidis.—33, Z 5. Et p. de xxx anguillis.—33, Z 12. Et/). de iii solidis.—34, l 11. p. de vi denariis.—35, l 19. Dim. p. iiii denariorum.—35, l 33. iii/). de iiii solidis.—35, / 47. xxv p. de xxxv solidis. iiii denariis mi¬ nus.—37, Z 38. ii p. sine censu.—38, Z12. ii/). de xii denariis.—38, Z 22. ii/). dexvii denariis.—38, L 28. p. de x denariis.—38, Z 37. Et /). de xii denariis.—39, Z13. Et dim. p. de ccc allecibus.—40, Z18. v. p. de xii denariis.—41, Z 29. ii p. de v denariis.—41, Z 41. Et /). de ii solidis.—41, Z 50. ii p. de v solidis.—42, Z 15. vii p. de v. solidis.—46, Z 44. ii p. de iii denariis.—47, Z1. Dim. p. viii denariorum.—50, l 44. Et iii p. de v solidis.—51, Z 46. iiii p. de mille et septingentis anguillis, xx minus.—55, Z 6. Et ii p. de ii solidis.—55, l 33. Ibi una/;.—55, Z 40. Una/), semens halite.—56, Z 9. PLACITUM. Barones regis qui p. tenuerunt.—6, 1 47. PLANUM. Inter nemus et p. —7,Z16. PONO. Posit/e in calle regis.—6, Z17. Posu.it extra M.—8, l 27. PORCI (vide ctiam PASNAGIUM et SILVA). PORTO. ltamum vel frondem/).—3, l 6. PORTUS. In introitu/). de Douere.—2, l 41. ii hedas, i.e. ii p. —8, l 8. De exitu p. xl solidi.—49, l 44. POSSESS10. p. S d M.—7, 1 1. POSSUM. Neque p. liabere dominum.—22, l 9. p. ire quolibet sine licentia.—22, l 40. p. eum terra sua vertere se.—23, l 9. p. se vertere quo voluit.—23, 1 13. p. se vertere cum terra.—23, l 20. p. se vertere quo voluit.—23, l 28. p. se vertere quo voluit.—23, l 3S. p. se vertere cum terra.—24, l 4. p. cum terra sua vertere.—27, l 4. p. ire cum terra quo voluit.—31, 1 10. pot.uit ire quo libuit.—31, l 16. patrem suum se posse vertere.—39, 111. potuit ire quo voluit cum terra.—40, 1 8. /). ire quolibet cum terris.—41, l 37. p. ire quolibet cum terns.—50, l 20. POSTMODUM. p. vero, regnante W. rege.—21, l 37. POSTQUAM. p. dedit M.—40, 1 10. POTEEANT, POTUIT, etc. (v. sub POSSUM). POTUS. Habent cibum et p. —3, l 38. PEdSMONITI. Si fuerint p. —3, l 39. PE/EPOSITUS. Inde p. regis accipiebat emendationem. —2, 1 15. p. inde reddit liiii libras.—2, l 23. Sequitur ilium p. regis.—6, l 39. /)., Brumannus nomine.—6, l 42. p. vero Francigena.—8, 1 10. CONCORDANCE. (59 PRriE Alestan p. Lundoniae.—8, l 20. Vicecomiti dat p. xii libras.—9, 1 12. Tamen/). reddit.—14, l 47. PE/ESTLTIT. Vieecomes p. ea Alestan.—8, Z 20. PE/ETER. D. p. regem.—22, l 9. p. hoc, habet.—22, Z 39. Omni consuetudiue/). tribus.—41, Z 52. PRATUM. viii acre /).... reddunt de censu xv solidos.—6, Z 9. [ii car. et dim.] et unum p. —7, Z 8. Aufert eis unum p, —7, Z 40. [Ibi lv car.] p. xxii acra.—8, Z 7. Ablatum est unum/).—8, Z16. Tantum p. quantum pertiuet ad x acras terra;.—8, Z 17. [Ibi xviii car.] et xliii acre/).—8, Z 35. [Ibi clxx car,] et xviii acre/).—8, Z 47. [Ibi xxvi car.] et ii acra p. —9, Z 22. [Ibi viii car. et] viii acra /).—10, Z 20. [Ibi li car.] et 1 acre/).—10, Z 26. [Ibi vii car.] et xxviii acras p.— 10, Z 29. [Ibi xi car. et] viii acne p.— 10, Z 36. [Ibi xii car.] et viii acre /).—10, Z 42. [Ibi x car.] et x acre p.—11, Z 2. [Ibi viii car.] et xxi acre p.— 11 Z 9. [Ibi xii car.] et xx acre p.— 11, Z15. [Ibi xvii car.] et ix acre/).—11, Z 23. [Ibi xxviii car.] et x acre p. —11,Z40. [Ibi ix car. et dim.] et xiii acras/).— 11, Z 44. [Ibi xvii car.] et xiiii acre /).—12, Z 6. [Ibi xxx car.] et xxxiii acre/).—12,Z15. [Ibi Ixi car. et dim.] et x acre p. —12, Z 23. [Ibi xxii car.] et xiii acre/).—12, Z 36. [Ibi xx car.] et n acre p. —12, Z 47. [Ibi vii car. et dim.] et xxiiii acras/).— 13, Z 5. [Ibi xxxv car. et dim.] et xx acre p. — 13, Z 13. [Ibi xvii car.] iiii acre p. —13, Z 18. [Ibi xxxi car. et dim.] xxv acre/).— 13, Z 26. [Ibi xiii car. et dim.] et xii acre p. et dim.—13, Z 31. [Ibi xix car.] et xiii acre p. —13, Z 51. [Ibi lxxxiii car.] cLxx acre /).—14, Z 7. [Ibi ix car.] et xx acre p. —14, Z 29. [Ibi lix car.] et xxx acre /).—14, Z 35. [x car. ,ct dim.] et xl acras p. —14, Z41. Ibi v car. et dim.] vi acre/).—15, Z 5. Ibi xx car.] et xxix acre/).—15, Z 13. i car. et dim.] et iii acre p. —15, Z 21. Ibi ix car.] et viii acre p. —15, Z 33. Ibi ii car.] et ii acre/).—15, Z 40. 'Ibi iii car.] et x acre/).—15, Z 49. Ibi vi car.] et vi acre /).—16, Z 3. Ibi xi car. et dim.] et xxxiii acre p. —16, Z 21. ‘iii car. et dim.] xviii acre p. —16, Z 27. Tbi xxv car.] et x acre /).—17, Z 5. 'vi car. et dim.] et vi acre p. —17, Z 12. Tbi xxv car.] et viii acre /).—17, Z 21. Ibi xxix car.] et xvi acre p. —17, Z 27. Ibi xxxiv car.] xii acre/).—17, Z 35. 'Ibi v. car.] et iiii acras/).—17, Z 38. Ibi vii car.] et xxxviacre/).—17, Z 44. Tbi xix car, et dim.] et xxxv acre p. — 18, Z 6. [Ibi iii car. et dim.] et xxiiii acre/).— 18, Z13. [Ibi vi car.] ii acre p.— 18, Z 24. [Ibi xvii car. et dim.] et xxx acre p. — 18, Z 29. [Ibi xix car.] et xii acre p.— 18, Z 35. [Ibi xxiv ear. et dim.] et xxvii acre p. —18, Z 40. [Ibi i: c car.] et xi acre p. —IS Z 45. [Ibi i car.] et x acras /).- -18, Z48. [Ibi X :vi car. et dim.] et xx acra/).- 19, Z 4. [Tbi > •xvii car.] et xviii a icra /).—19, 11. [Ibi xxxviii car. et dim.] xiii acre p.- 19, Z 20. [Ibi ii car.] xii acre p.— 19, Z 30. [Ibix iv car.] ii acre p.— -19, Z 36. [Ibi i ii car. et dim.] et vii acre/).- 19, Z 42. [Ibi X iii ear.] ct xx acre; ?).—20 Z 4. [Ibi x iii car.] et lxxii acre :/).—20, Z1S PRA PRA [Ibi v car.] et iiii acre p .— 20, Z 20. Tbi x i car,] et ii acre/).—20, / 28. Tbi v i car.] et Lx acre p.— 20, Z 34. Ibi ii car.] ct ii acre p. — 20, l 44. Tbi vi Ibi v Tbi ii i car.] et xxx acre /).—20, Z 49. car.] et xx acre/).—21, Z 4. car.] et iiii acre /).—21, Z S. [Ibi ix car.] et xxx acre p.— 21, Z12. [Ibi x Tbi v i car.] et xl acre p.— 21, Z IS. car.] 1 acre p.— 21, Z 22. Ibi VI car.] et iiii acre p.— 21, Z 32. Tbi v car.] et xii acre/).—22, Z 6. Tbi x i car. 1 et xl acre /).—22, Z 12. Tbi i car.] una acra /).—22, Z 28. Tbi ii car.] et dim. acra p.— 22, Z 33. Tbi ii car.] vaera/).—23, Z 3. Tbi ii boves] et ii acre p. — 23, Z 7. Ibi i ar.] et vi acre /).— 23, Z12. Tbi ii cm-.] v acre /).— 23, Z 17. Ibi ii ar.] et iiii acre p .— 23, Z 24. [Ibi i car.] et una acra et dim. p. — 23, 31. [Ibi V boves] et viii acre p. — 23, Z 35. [Ibi ii car.] iii acre /).—23, Z 41. [Terra i car. et dim.] iii acre/). — 23, Z 47. Terra iii car.] et vi acre p.— 24, Z 2. Tbi ii car.] et ix acre p. — 24, Z 8. Tbi ii car.] et viii acre p.— 24, Z12. Ibi X icar.] et xxx acre /).—24, Z19. Tbi ii car.] et xii acre p .— 24, Z 26. lbix car.] et x acre/). — 24, Z 42. Tbi v Ibi ii car.] et x acre p.— 24, Z 47. car.] et i acra/i. — 25, Z 14. Tbi vi cm - .] et xxii acre p. — 25, Z 25. ibi X ii car.] et xxii acre/).—25, Z 31. Tbi ii car.] iiii acra p. — 25, Z 36. [Ibi ii i car.] et v acre p. —£5, Z 41. [Ibi ii i car.] et viii acre/).—25, Z 45. [Ibi ii ctu-.] et vi acre /).— 26, Z 19. [Ibi car. et dim.] xii acre p. — 26, Z 24. [Ibi X car.] et xii acre/). — 26, Z 31. [Ibi i car. et dim.] et i acra/). — 26, Z 39. [Ibi v car.] et viii acre/). — 26, Z 44. Ibi ii T bi i car.] x acre /).— 27, Z1. car.] et xi acre /).— 27, Z 8. Tbi i car. et iii boves] et v acre p. — 27, Z 17. Tbi v car.] et ix acre p. — 27, Z 23. Ibi ii car.] et iiii acre p.— 27, Z 29. Tbi ii Ibi i i car.] et viii acre p. — 27, Z 34. car. et dim.] et v acre p. — 27, Z 39. Ibi nil est nisi ii acre/).—27, Z 43. [Ibi iii car.] et xii acre /).—27, Z 48. [Ibi vii ear.] et iii acre p. et dim.— 28, Z 10. Ibi ii car.] et vii acre p. —2S, Z 28. Tbi vii car.] xii acre/).—28, Z 37. Tbi viii car.] ct x acre p.— 28, Z 43. Tbi vi car.] et iii acre/).—28, Z 49. Ibi xviii car.] et xii acre/).—29, Z 5. Terra vi car.] vii acre /).—29, Z 16. Ibi dim. car.] et i acra p. et dim.— 29, Z 24. [Terra iii car.] et ii acre p. et dim.— 29, Z 28. [Ibi ix car.] et viii acre/).—29, Z 33. [Ibi iii car. et dim.] et vi acre /).—29, Z 41. Tbi viii'car.] v acre p. —30, Z1. Tbi vi car.] et iiii acre/).—30, Z 7. Tbi vii car.] et vi acre /).—30, Z12. Tbi vi car.] et viii acre p.— 30, Z17. [Ibi i car. et dim.] et vi acre p .—30, Z 23. [Ibi v car.] et iii acre p.— 30, Z 30. [Ibi i car. et dim.] et i acra p .—30, Z 35. [Ibi i car.] iiii acre p. —30, Z 41. [Ibi iii car. et dim.] et i acra p .—30, Z 46. Tbi i car.] et ii acras p. —31, Z 3. Tbi iicar. et dim.] et li acre p. —31, Z 8. Tbi i car.] et iiii acre /).—31, Z 19. Ibi ii car.] et iii acre p. —31, Z 24. Tbi i car. et ii animalia] et iiii acre p. —31, Z28. [Ibi iii car. et dim.] et viii acre p .— 31, Z 34. [Ibi v car.] et iiii acre/).—31, Z 41. [Ibi i car.] et i acra/). et dim.—31, Z 46. 31, Z 50. [Ibi xiii car.] et xx acre/).—32, Z 5. [Ibi iii car.] xii acre /).—32, Z 12. [Ibi ii car.] et xii acre /).—32, Z 17. [Ibi xlvii car.] et xxxii acre /).—32 Z 26. [Ibi ii car. et dim.] et xii acre p — 32, Z 39. [Ibi dim. car.] et iiii acras p. —32, Z 42. [Ibi [Ibi i [Ibi v [Ibi v [Ibi ii [lb‘ ‘ 33, Z 23 ■.] et x acre /).—32, Z 49. .] et iii acras /).—33, Z1. ir.] et vii acre /).—33, l 6. r.] et ii acre p. —33, Z 12. ir.] et iii acre p. —33, Z 18. ct dim.] et viii acre p .— [Ibi i .... [Ibi i ca; ir.] et una • -ar.] ct iiii [Ibi xix car.] et x [Ibi i car.] et ii a [Ibi iii car.] et ii. [Ibi vii car.] et xv :ra/).—33, Z 28. re /).—33, Z 32. acre />.—33, Z 37. is /).—33, Z 40. re /).—33, Z 44. re/).—33, Z 52. [Ibi ix car. et dim.] et xxx acre p .— 34, Z 11. [Ibi ii car. et dim.] et v Z17. [Ibi i car. et dim.] et xii acre p. —34, Z 28. Tbi dim. car.] et x acre p. —34, Z 35. Tbi ii car.] et vi acre p— 34, Z 40. Tbi dim. car.] et iiii acre /).—34, Z 45. Tbi i car.] et i acra /).—34, Z 48. Ibi ii car. et dim.] et xiii acre p .— 35, Z 40. Tbi xi car.] et xxxii acre p.— 35, Z 47. Tbi lix car.] et c acre/).—36, Z 21. Ibi ii car.] et xii acras/).—36, l 31. Ibi i car.] et v acras/).—36, Z 33. Tbi i ear.] et iii acras /).—36, Z 38. Tbi v car.] et xx acre p. —36, Z 42. Tbixxiii car.] et xxviii acre p. — 31,1 5. Tbi xxi car.] et xx acre p.— 37, Z 40. Tbi x car.] et xx acras p.— 37, Z 43. Ibi iii car.] et ii acre/).—38, Z17. Tbi xiv car.] et ix acre/).—38, Z 30. [Ibi xi car.] et xiii acre/).—38, Z 38. Ibi ii car. et dim.] et ii acra p. —38, Z 48. [Ibi i car. etdim.] et ii acre/).—40, Z 6. [Ibi i car. et dim.] et viii acre /).—40, Z27. [Ibi ii carj et xiii acre/).—40, Z 32. [Ibi i cm-.Jet x acre./).—40, Z 37. [Ibi ii car. et dim.] xiiii acre p. —40, Z 42. Tbi v car.] xxxiii acre/).—40, Z 47. [Ibi i car.] et una acra p. —41, Z 2. Ibi v car.] et xx acre/).—41, Z 12. Ibi ii car.] et viii acra p. —41, Z 19. [Ibi i car. et dim.] et x acre p. —41, [Ibi xix car.] et x acre p. —41, Z 41. [Ibi iii car.] et iiii acre p — 42, Z 28. [Ibi iii car. et dim.] et iiii acre p .— 42, Z 51. [Ibi ii ear. et dim.] et x acre p. —44, Z19. [Ibi xxvi car.] et cxxxiii acre p. —45, Z 41. [Ibi xviii car.] et viii acre p.— 46, Z13. [Ibi ii car.] ct iii acre p. et dim.—4:6, Z 19. [Ibi viii car. et dim.] ct xvii acre/).— 46, Z 27. [Ibi ix car. et dim.] et xxxviii acre p. Tbi i car.] et xvi acre p. —46, Z 39. Tbi xiv car.] et xxviii acre/).—46, Z 45. Tbi xliiii car.] 1 acre p.— 47, Z 9. Tbi i car.] et vii acre p. —47, Z 26. Tbi ii car.] ii acre p.— 47, Z 32. [Ibi i car;] et vi acre p.— -47, Z 35. Terra dim. car.] et vii acre p.—47, Z 38. [Ibi i car.] xi ncra/).^47, Z 48. [Ibi xl car.] xl acre /).—4S, Z 7. Et xi acras p. de terra V.—48, Z 21. [Ibi vi car.] x acre /).— 49, Z 22. [Ibi xix car.] xxx acra/i.—49, Z 44. [Ibi iii cai'. et dim.] et xii acre p .— 50, Z 6. [Ibi i car.] et iii acre p.— 50, Z10. [Ibi i car.] et viii acre p. —50, Z 14. TO CONCORDANCE. PRA "Ibi ii car.] et viii acne p. —50, 718. 'Ibi i car.] et vi acras j».—50, 7 22. 'Ibi x car.] et xl acne p. —51, 7 17- Terra est iii car. Nulla ibi car.] et v acne p. —51, 7 25. [Ibi ii car.] iii acne />. —51, 7 28. [Ibi ix car.] et xxxviii acne /;.—51, 7 47. [Ibi vii car.] et xxxvi acne p. —52,75. [Ibi iii car. et dim.] et xxiiii acne p .— 52, 7 12. [Ibi v car. et dim.] et xx acne p. —52, [Ibi i car.] et x acne p. —52, 7 32. [Ibi vii car.] et xxx acne p. —52, 7 37. [Ibi i car.] et viii acne p. —52, 7 42. [Ibi i car.] et iiii acne p. —62, 7 44. [Ibi ii car.] et iiii acr* p. —53, 7 5. [Ibi xii car.] et xx aerie/;.—53, 7 28. [Ibi dim. car.] et v acne p. —53, 7 46. [Ibi iii car.] et x acne p. —54, 7 5. [Ibi i car.] et viii acne p. —54, 7 21. [Ibi xxxii car.] et xvi acne p. —54, 7 32. [Ibi xxxiii car.] et xxvi acne p. —54, 7 38. [Ibi vii car. et dim.] v acne p. —55,77. [Ibi vii ear.] et iiii acne p. —55, 713. [Ibi v boves et x car.] xx acne p. —55, 7 21. [Ibi xii ear.] xx acne p. —55, 7 34. [Ibi iii car.] et ii acne/;.—55, 7 39. [Ibi v car.] xii acne p. —56, 7 8. PREBEND A. Erant p. communes.—4, 714. Tenet i M. in p. —4, 717. Leuuinus tenuit in p. —4, 7 20. Iste idem tenuit in p. —4, 7 28. Elric tenuit in p. —4, 7 32. Pater ejusdem tenuit in/;.—4, 7 36. Alric tenuit in p. —4, 7 39. Pater hujus tenuit in/;.—4, 7 42. Sigar tenuit in p. —4, 7 48. De hac p. sumpsit.—5, 7 9. Hie c acne erant de p. —5, 715. Tenuit in p. similiter.—5, 7 26. Pater ipsius tenuit in/;.—5, 7 32. Spirites tenuit in/;.—5, 7 35. Sired tenuit in/;.—5, 7 38. PRECIUM. p. ejus non potuit computari.—2, 7 21. PRESBYTER. Ibi sunt vii p. qui reddunt vii libras et v solidos.—14, 7 23. Anscbitillus p. tenet de eo.—20, 7 22. Unus p. qui dat xl solidos per annum. —35, 7 45. Eduni p. tenuit de rege E.—41, 7 30. Ibi unmet unus/;.—44, 7 37. Ibi iecclesia et unus p. qui dat xx soli¬ dos per annum.—46, 7 50. Quod Ylsi p. tenuit de rege E.—50, 7 8. Ibi iecclesia et/;.—50, 7 14. Ibi iecclesia et p. —50, 7 26. Aluuinus p. tenuit.—53, 7 17. PRETIUM (v. sub PRECIUM). PRIMUS. In ipso p. adventu.—2, 7 20. PROFICUUM. Sed non ad/;, canonicorum.—7, 7 26. PROPRIA. p. ejus M.—21, 7 26. PltOSTR AVE It IT. Aut arborem intra viam/;.—3, 7 5. PROTECTOR. Revocant ad p. —2, 7 34. Revocat ad/;.—6, 7 25. PUBLICUS. Strictior fiat p. via.—3, 7 4. Infra has/;, vias.—6, 7 38. QUIA. Dicit q. valet.—S, 711. q. habuit T.R.E.—39, 7 16. QUID AM. Et q. silva.—8, 7 27. q. nomine Blize tenet.—18,7 16. q. inulier tenuit.—22, 7 20. Ibi q. miles.—22, 7 38. q. Francigena.—30, 7 45. Pertinet q. libera terra.—31, 7 36. q. miles ejus.—37, 7 30. Terra cujusdam Rannulfi militis.— 37, 7 49. q. Turstinus tenet i J.—38, 7 42. QUI Tenet q. miles.—38, 7 49. Ibidem manet q. Altet.—42, 7 47. Tenet q. miles.—42, 7 57. Dedit cuidam suo fratri.—45, 7 22. Tenuit q. soehmannus.—52, 7 47. QU1ETO. Nuuquam se q. apud regem.—23, 7 26. QUIETUS. q. erat de theloneo.—2,7 17. q. erit erga regem.—3,7 12. Consuetudines q. habuerint.—6, 7 46. Sunt q. pro servitio man’s.—41, 7 52. Semper q. fuit et sine consuetudine.— 46, 7 23. Se defendil pro v S. qiiielis. —46, 7 42. Dim. S. quod semper fuit q. —47, 7 25. S cns A. habet i J. q. ab omni scoto re- gio.—49, 7 28. QUOLIBET. Poterant ire q. sine licentia.—22, 7 40. Poterant ire q. cum terris.—41, 7 37- Potuerunt ire q. cum terris suis.—50, 7 21. RAMUS. Inde r. vel frondem, portaverit.—3,7 6. RECEDUNT. Sine forisfactura r .— 3, 7 39. RECIPIO (v. etiam sub YALEO). Qui exulem r. —3, 7 35. Quando r. arcbiepiscopus.—10,710. Quando r., iii juga.—43, 717. Quando ?•., fecit unum M.—43, 7 32. RECUAMO. r. abbas S d A. quia habuit T.R.E.— 39, 7 15. RECOG.NOSCO. r. se injuste accepisse.—6, 7 45. RECTUS. Concordatum de r. —6, 7 34. Similiter de r. callibus extra.—6, 7 36. REDDO. T.R.E. r. xviii libras.—2, 7 2. r. regi consuetudiuem.—2, 717. Pnepositus inde r. liiii libras.—2, 7 23. Et r. Ixi libras.—4, 7 14. Et r. ei xi solidos.—4,7 24. Ii Burgenses r. gablum.—6, 7 2. Burgenses gablum r. sunt xix.—6, 7 4. iii molendina r. eviii solidos.—6,7 8. Theloneum r. lxviii solidos.—6, 7 9. r. de censu xv solidos.—6, 7 10. r. xxx libras arsas et pensatas, et xxiiii libras ad numenun.—6, 7 13. r. xi solidos et ii denarios et i obolum. —6, 7 30. Qui tenet, r. xl libras.—6, 7 49. r. xxii solidos.—7,7 4. r. xvi solidos et viii denarios.—7, 7 7. r. xvi solidos et viii denarios.—7, 7 9. r. xx solidos ii deuariis minus.—7,711. r. ix solidos iii denariis minus.—7,712. r. 1 denarios.—7, 7 14. r. xx solidos et vi denarios.—7, 7 17. r. lx solidos ad caleiamenta.—7, 7 20. S ca Margrita r. viii libras.—7, 7 20. Tres iecclesia! r. xxxvi solidos et viii denarios.—7, 7 22. xvi deuarios r. —7, 7 24. r. vii libras. T.R.E. tantundem r. —7, 7 25. Una pastura r. ii solidos.—7, 7 28. Nunquain r. aliquid consuetudinis vel scoti.—7, 7 32. Tamen r. lxx libras pensatas; et cxi solidos de denariis xx in ora. Et vii libras et xxvi denarios ad nume- Super luce r. vicecomiti c solidos.—S, 7 14. Tamen r. xxxi libras.—8, 7 37. r. 1 solidos, pro Ineuuardo et aueris.— 9, 7 3. r. cxl libras ad ignem et ad pensam, et insuper xv libras et vi solidos, ii de¬ nariis minus, ad numenun.—9,7 10. r. xvi denarios per annum.—9, 713. r. xxxv solidos.—10, 7 4. r. simile servitium regi.—10, 7 7. regi xv libras.—10, 7 9. r. xl libras de firma et xl milia de alle- cibus.—10, 710. r. 1 libras de firma, et alleces sicut prius. —10, 712. vi solidos et viii denarios.—10, 719. RED Tamen qui tenet r. xviii libras.—10, 7 22. Tamen r. xxiii libras, et unum militem in servitio archiepiscopi.-—10, 7 38. Tamen r. xxx libras et viii solidos.— 10, 7 44. Tamen r. xxi libras.—11, 7 3. Tamen r. xv libras.—11, 7 11. Tamen r. xxxvii libras et x solidos.— 11, 717. Tamen r. xxxv libras.—11, 7 32. Tamen r. xxvi libras, xii denariis minus. Quod tenet francigena xl solidos.— 12,7 9. r. 1 libras, et xiiii solidos, et ii denarios. Et arcliidiacono xx solidos.—12,7 26. Et tamen r. lx libras.—13, 7 28. Tamen r. xx libras.—13, 7 33. Modo r. c libras et xx solidos.—14,7 9. r. viii solidos et iiii denarios.—14, 713. r. vii libras et v solidos.—14, 7 24. Tamen r. xv libras.—14, 7 25. Et tamen r. lx libras.—14, 7 37. Tamen prmpositus r. xviii libras et x solidos.—14, 7 47. Tamen r. xii libras et x solidos.—16, 7 6. Tamen r. c solidos.—16, 7 9. Tamen r. xi libras.—16, 7 29. Tamen r. xxviii libras.—17,7 7. Nunquain r. scot.—-17, 7 23. r. viii libras et iiii solidos.—18, 713. Tamen r. xxx libras.—18, 7 31. Tamen r. xxx libras.—18, 7 36. Tamen r. xxvii libras.—18, 7 41. Tamen r. xl libras.—19, 7 6. Modo xlvi libras et xxvi solidos et iiii denarios. Et archiepiseopo c so¬ lidos de Garsumune.—19, 7 25. Tamen xiii libras.—19, 7 27. Tamen r. xxiiii libras et uuciam ami. —20, 7 7. Tamen r. xx libras, et unam unciam auri, et unum marsum.—20, 714. Tamen r. xxi libras, duos solidos mi¬ nus.—20, 7 30. Tamen per annum r. xi libras, et xiii solidos, et iiii denarios.—21, 7 28. Tamen r. qui tenet xiii libras et xx de¬ narios.—21, 7 33. Tamen qui tenet r. xxx libras.—24,7 21. Tamen qui tenet r. xii libras.—24,7 32. Tamen qui tenet r. xxxv libras.—24,7 44. i domus r. xxx denarios.—28, 7 29. Tamen r. xii libras.—28, 7 50. Tamen r. xxv libras.—29, 7 35. Tamen r. xii libras.—30, 7 2. r. v solidos per annum.—30, 7 4. Tamen r. xviii libras.—30, 7 8. Tamen r. xviii libras.—30, 7 19. Una domus r. xxv denarios.—30, 7 50. iii domus r. xl denarios.—31, 7 14. Tamen reddit xiiii [libras].—31, 7 42. Tamen r. xxxv libras.—32, 7 7. Tamen qui eum tenet r. cxiii libras.— 32, 7 29. Et vi solidos r. —32, 7 30. Tamen r. xx solidos.—32, 7 44. iiii hag® r. iii solidos.—33, 714. Et tamen r. lv libras.—33, 7 38. Qui tenet r. xiiii libras.—34, 71. Tamen r. x libras.—35, 7 25. Tamen r. xviii libras.—35, 7 35. r. vi solidos et viii denarios.—35, 7 51. Qua: r. viii solidos.—36, 7 5. Tamen r. 1 libras.—37, 7 6. r. iii denarios et i obolum.—37, 7 16. Unum V. r. ii solidos.—37, 7 25. Tamen r. ei c libras.—37, 7 47. Qui r. iiii solidos et vi denarios.—3S, 7 3. iiii B. r. vi solidos.—38, 7 7. xiii masurm r. xv solidos.—3S, 7 29. Tamen r. lxxx libras et xl solidos.— 38, 7 32. i J. quod r. v solidos.—38, 7 42. Silva est, sed nil r .—38, 7 4S. r. xiii denarios T.R.E.—39,7 7. ii Y. r. 1 denarios.—39, 7 9. i B. r. v denarios.—39, 7 19. Et r. xx solidos.—39, 7 38. ii B. r. ii solidos.—39, 7 47. i V. r. vi solidos.—40, 7 2. RED ii V. habent ii car., et r. vi solidos.— 40.7 22. Tamen r. de firma lxx libras.—41, 7 42. r. xxii denarios per aunum.—42,7 11. Et tamen r. xiii libras.—42, 7 22. Et tamen r. xii libras et xii solidos.— 42, 7 30. iii V. cum. i B. r. iiii solidos et vii de¬ narios.—42, 7 40. Unum molimun qui r. xlviii ferliugels de frumento.—42, 7 44. Et tamen r. iiii libras.—43, 7 2. Et tamen r. iiii libras.—43, 710. xxxii nmsurie r. xiii solidos et viii de¬ narios.—43, 7 28. Tamen r. viii libras.—43, 7 35. Inde r. de firma vi libras.—44, 7 25, iiii masune r. vi solidos, unum dena- rium minus.—45, 7 13. Unus V. r. xxx denarios.—45, 7 16. Unus V. r. vi solidos.—45, 719. Unus V. r. xxx denarios (valet x soli¬ dos).—45, 7 23. r. de consuetudine vi denarios.—45, 7 47. Tenet ii partes i S. r. xii deuarios.— 45, 7 48. Habet ii J. r. ccc anguillas et ii solidos. —45, 7 49. Sacam et Socam T.R.E. 45, 7 49. Tamen r. xiiii libras et viii solidos et iii denarios.—46, 7 7. Et tamen liiii libras.—46, 7 47. xcvii masurie r. xiii solidos.—47, 7 18. Modo lxxiii masurie tantundem r. — 47.7 IS. vi Burgenses r. xxii solidos.—47, 7 21. r. ii solidos et unam summnrn farinas. —47, 7 27. Nullum servitium r. nisi xxx solidos.— 48, 7 16. Ipse r. abbati xv solidos. — 48, 7 22. r. inde 1 denarios.—48, 7 24. Nullum servitium inde r. nisi xxx soli¬ dos per annum abbati.—48, 7 37. Et tamen viii libras.—48, 7 42. r. inde c denarios per annum.—49,7 9. viii libras et xii solidos r. —49, 7 44. Niehil reddit nee reddidit. —53,7 15. Et r. xxiiii solidos.—53, 718. r. v denarios de pasnagio.—54, 7 6. ii B. r. xxx deuarios.—54, 712. ii B. r. iiii solidos.—54, 7 17. Unus B. xii denarios r. —54, 7 24. xi B. r. xii denarios.—55, 7 28. iiii dense de silva r. xxx porcos de pas- nagio.—56, 7 8. Quie r. lxiiii denarios.—56, 712. r. in Neuuetone una cousuetudo.— 56, 7 13. De his ix S. r. averam.—56, 718. REGINA. Et Eddeuie r. —6, 7 32. Sidgar tenuit de r. Eddid.—56, 7 2. REGIUS. Quietum ab omni scoto r. —49, 7 29. REGNO. W. rege.—21, 7 37. RELEVAMEN. De terns eoram habet r. —3, 7 23. RELEVATIO. Rex habet terrse.—3,7 17- REMANEO. In firma regis r. —S, 7 23. Que r. extra divisionem.—37, 7 9. Qua: r. extra divisionem.—41, 7 14. r. foris divisionem suam.—41, 7 24. Quie r. extra divisionem.—41, 7 44. RET1NEO. In manu sua r. episcopus.—34, 7 4. REVOCO. r. ad protectorem.—2, 7 34. r. ad protectorem.—6, 7 25. REX. Dederunt xx naves r. —2, 7 6. Quando missatici r. veniebant.—2,7 9. Treuua r. erat in villa.—2,714. Inde prmpositus r. —2, 7 15. Reddebat r. consuetudinem.—2, 717- r. quidem xxiiii libras. — 2, 7 24. r. perdidit consuetudinem.—2, 7 26. Dim. terra est r. —2, 7 36. Forisfactura dim. est r. —2, 7 39. Tenuit consuetudinem r. —2, 7 40. CONCORDANCE. REX Damnum faeit r .— 2, 7 44. Has leges r, —3, 7 1. Publica via r. —3, 7 5. Solvet. r. c solidos.—3, 7 5. Minister r. eum sequetur.—3, 7 9. viii libris r. emendabit.—3, 711. Quietus erit erga n—3, 712. Has forisfacturas habet r.— 3, 7 IS. r. iude habet relevationem.—3, 717. Habet r. forisfacturam.—3, 7 22. Habet r. has forisfacturas.—3, 7 29. Habet r. hominem.—3, 7 31. De quibus r. nichil habet.—3, 7 33. Habet r. medietatem peeunhe.—3, 7 34. Sine licentia r. —3, 7 35. Inde habet r. forisfacturam.—3, 7 35. Habet r. custodiam vi diebus.—3, 7 37. Habent de r. cibum et potum.—3, 7 38. De aliis omnibus r. c solidos habebit. 3, 7 42. Habet r. consuetudinem.—3, 7 44. Custodiebant r. —3, 7 49. Si r. illuc venisset.—3, 7 50. Habet r. saeam et socam.—6, 7 8. Solebant esse legatorum r. —6, 7 10. Posit® in calle r. —6, 7 17- r. habebat saeam et socam.—6, 7 19. Habebaut de r. xxxiii acras.—6, 7 20. Tenebant in alodia de r. —6, 7 23. De quibus est saca et soca r. —6, 7 28. Habet r. saeam et socam.—6, 7 31. r. emendabit.—6, 7 35. Sequitur ilium prmpositus r. —6, 7 39. Emendam aceipiet ad opus r. —6,7 40. Judicio baronum r. —6, 7 47. Terra r.— 8, 7 1. De isto M. r. —8, 715. In firma r. remanebat.—8, 7 23. De.eodem M. r .— 8, 7 26. De silva r.— 9, 7 13. xl solidi de iiii S. r. —9, 717. Hcddit simile servitium r. sicnt Dovere. —10, 7 7. Reddebat r. xv libras.—10, 7 9. r. habet omne servitium.—16, 7 36. Et sunt in manu r.— 16, 7 39. Neque potuit habere dominum prater r.— 22, 7 9. r. habet inde ii denas.—22, 7 43. r. habet in manu sua quod valet x so¬ lidos.—22, 7 49. De isto M. habet Rex quod valet x so¬ lidos.—23, 7 4. De hoc M. tenet r. quod valet viii soli¬ dos.—23, 7 9. r. habet silvam, pro novo dono epis- copi, et valet iii solidos.—23,718. Quod nunquam se quietavit apud r. — 23, 7 25. >'■ habet de silva hujus M. quod valet viii solidos.—23, 7 37. r. habet de isto M. pro novo dono epis- copi, quod valet x denarios.—23, 7 42. r. habet pro novo dono episcopi, tan- tum silva; de isto M. quod valet v solidos.—24, 7 2. Ording tenuit de r .— 24, 7 9. Quod r. tenet de hoc M., xxii solidis. —25, 7 10. Aluuoldus tenuit de r. —25, 7 33. Aluuinus tenuit de r .— 25, 7 42. Tenuerunt de r. ii fratres. —25, / 47. r. tenet pro novo dono episcopi quod valet xxiiii solidos et ii denarios.— 26, 7 33. r. viii solidos et v denarios pro novo dono episcopi.—27, 7 10. Tenet ad firmum de r. Totintdne, de novo dono episcopi.—27, 7 36. Tenet ad firmarn de r. —27, 7 42. r. habet de hoc M. tres denas.—28, 7 50. Eddeua tenuit de r. —29, 712. Alnodus tenuit de r .— 32, 7 50. r. habet de eodem M. quod valet xvi denarios.—33, 7 47. De hoc M. est in manu r. quod valet vii solidos.—34, 7 2. Quos abstulit villanis regia. —35, 7 15. Nunc usque scotum r. non scotavit.— 37,719. Werelin tenuit de r. —40, 7 39. Hffic terra est in manu r. —41,7 6. REX Habet r. omne servitium.—41, 7 52. De novo dono episcopi, habet, in manu r., de llicardo filio Gisleberti x V. cum iii car.—44, 7 23. Omnia forisfaetura qua; juste pertinent r. — 45, 7 50. Abbas de Gand tenet de r. Levesham. —49, 7 40. Tenet Haintone de r. quod Ylsi pres¬ byter tenuit de r. E.—50, 7 8. Et fait de dominio r .— 53, 7 17. Comes Eustachius tenet de r. Oistee- ham.—54, 7 28. Haimo Vieecomes tenet de r. unum M. —55, 7 17. Albertus Capellanus tenet de r. Newe- tone.—56, 7 1. ROT. Quam Azor r. tenuit.—51,7 31. RUSTICUS. Ibi est unus r.— 7, 7 20. xi moliui cum gablo r. —49, 7 43. SACA et SOCA. Eis perdonaverat s. et *.—2, 7 8. Qui habent suam s. et s.—3, 7 24. Habuerunt isti sachem et s. —4, 7 2. Super quos habebat s. et s. —6, 7 3. Super quos habet rex s. et s.—6, 7 8. Rex autem habebat a. et a. —6, 719. De quibus est s. et a. regis.—6, 7 28. Per totam civitatem Cantuahl® habet rex a. et a.—6, 7 31. Si abbas liabuisset sacaa et aocas, xx li¬ bris plus appreciaretur.—45, 7 45. a. et s. T.R.E. reddebant.—45, 7 49. De xxii hundredis pertinent isti M. *. et a. et omnia forisfaetura quae juste pertinent regi.—45, 7 50. De illo qui earn tenebat, habebat abbas s. et a.— 49, 7 38. . SACRAMENTUM. a. facto.—6, 7 45. SAISITA. Inde est modo a. —21, 7 39. SAL. xlvii salinse de 1 summis a. —47, 7 9. SALINA. Aufcrt unam a. —7, 7 41. Ibi xxvii s. de xxvii solidis.—8, 7 47- ii a. de iii solidis et ii denariis.—9, 7 23. Et ii s.— 11, 7 44. Et v a. de Ixiiii denariis.—12, 7 16. vii a. de xxv solidis et iiii denariis.— 12, 7 29. a. de xvi denariis.—13,7 19. Cum a. de xxx denariis.—13, 7 43. Et ii a. de v solidis.—13,7 51. Et iiii a. de iiii solidis.—15, 7 49. Ibi vii a. de viii solidis et ix denariis. —16, 7 32. Una a. de xv denariis.—18,71. Et a. de vi denariis.—18, 7 40. iii a. de iiii solidis.—19, 7 11. Et s. de xii denariis.—35, 7 3. Et una a. de xxx denariis.—35, 7 33. Et ii a. de xxxii denariis.—35, 7 46. Una a. de xxx denariis.—36, 7 27. i a. de xxviii denariis.—38, 713. Et a. de iiii denariis.—38, 7 37- Ibi ii a. —39, 7 3. x a. de c denariis.—41, 7 40. Ibi una a. —47, 7 1. xlvii a. de 1 summis salis.—47, 7 9. Ibi viii a. cum tereia parte non® a. de xx solidis.—50, 7 44. SCIRA, SCYRA. Ut conveniant ad a. —3, 7 40. •Sci/ra testificatur.—49, 7 37. SCOTARE (v. etiam ESCOTARE). Scotum regis non s. —37, 7 19. SCOTU3. Aliquid consuetudinis vel s .—7, 7 33. Cum his vi S. geldabat T.R.E. quamvis non pertineret M-, nisi de a. quia li¬ bera terra erat.—17,714. Dim. S. quidem nunquam reddidit a. — 17, 7 23. a. regis non scotavit.—37, 7 19. Quietum ab omni a. regio.—49, 7 29. SCRIPTUS. Has infra a. leges regis.—3, 71. Sicut superius a. est.—3, 7 43. Supra a. est.—19, 7 47. SCYRA (v. SCIRA). SED SEDET. Terre in qua castellum a. —8, 7 41. SEPEM. Si quis fecerit a. —3, 7 4. SEQUOR. Miuister regis eum s.—3, 7 9. a. ilium prapositus regis.—6, 7 39. SERVIO. Sexta piscaria qum s. ad hallam.—22, 7 13. vii masuras terra; qua; T.R.E. a, S“ A. —47, 7 23. i piscaria -s. hall®.—56, 7 9. SERVITIUM, Simile a. regi sicut Dovere.—10, 7 7. i militem in a. archiepiscopi.—10,7 38. Rex habet omne a. ab eis.—16, 7 36. Ipsi habent omnes consuetudincs, etc., pro a. maris.—16, 7 37. Avera, id est a. —37, 7 39. s. unius militis.—40, 7 44. Habet rex omne a. —41, 7 52. Sunt quieti, pro a. maris, ab omni con- suetudine pneter tribus, latricinio, pace infracta, forstel.—11, 7 52. Archiepiscopus aufert ei a. —47, 7 23. Nullum a. reddit abbati nisi xxx soli¬ dos quos persolvit in anno.—48,716. Nullum a. inde reddit nisi xxx solidos per annum abbati.—48, 7 37. SERVUS. Cum iiii a. —4, 7 35. Ibi sunt iii a. —8, 7 6. Ibi viii s. —8, 7 34. In hoc M. sunt x a. —9, 7 4. Ibi v *.—9, 7 21. Ibi vi *.—10, 718. Ibi viii a.— 10, 7 25. Ibi v a.— 10, 7 2S. Ibi viii a.— 10, 7 35. Ibi v a.~ 11, 71. Et v *.—11,7 8. Et vii *.—11, 714. Et x *.—11, 7 23. Ibixs.—11, 7 30. Etx*.—11, 7 38. Et x *.—11, 7 43. Et iii *.—12, 7 4. Et v *.—12, 7 29. Ibi ii s.—12, 7 36. Et uno a. —13, 7 8. Ibi xii *.—13, 7 25. Ibi viii *.—13, 7 30. Ibi viii *.—13, 7 38. Et viii *.—13, 7 45. Et xiii *.—14, 7 6. Et viii *.—14, 7 30. Et x *.—14, 7 34. Et i *.—14, 7 40. Et ix *.—15, 7 12. Et iiii *.—15, 7 20. Et xv *.—15, 7 26. Ibi v *.—15, 7 49. Ibi iiii *.—16, 7 3. Et iiii *.—16, 7 S. Et ii *.—16, 7 20. Etx*.—17, 711. Et xii *.—17,7 21. Et xvii *.—17, 7 27. Ibi viii *.—17, 7 34. Et iiii *.—17, 7 37. Et ii *.—17, 7 44. Etis.—18, 7 23. Et i *.—18, 7 28. Et ii *.—18, 7 34. Ibi v*.—18, 7 39. Cum iiii a. —18, 7 48. Ibi vii *.—19,7 3. Et iii *.—18, 7 20. Etiis.—19, 7 11. Ibi vii *.—20,7 4. Et iiii *.—20,7 11. Et iii *.—20,7 19. Ibi vi *.—20, 7 33. Et i *.—20, 7 44. Et v *.—20, 7 48. Et ii *.—21,7 4. Et iiii «.—21,7 S. Et ii *.—21, 7 12. Etix*.—21, 717. Et iiii *.—21,7 31. Ibi iii *.—22, 7 5. Et x *.—22, 7 12. Ibi iii *.—22, 7 19. SEIl Et ii *.—22, 7 22. Et iiii *.—22, 7 28. Ibi v ».—22, 7 33. viii inter s. et ancillas;—22, 7 38. Ibi vii *.—22, 7 48. Et i *.—23, 7 17. Et v *.—23, 7 24. Et v *.—23, 7 31. Eti*.—23, 7 47. Ibi unus *.—24, 7 12. Ibi ii *.—24,7 18. Et unus *.—24, 7 25. Ibi iiii *.—24, 7 41. Ibi vi *.—24,7 47. Ibi xiii *.—25, 7 2. Ibi x *.—25, 7 7. Et v *.—25, 7 IS. Et v *.—25, 7 24. Ibi ix «.—25, 7 31. Ibi ii «.—25, 7 41. Ibi ii *.—25, 7 45. Ibi unus *.—26, 71. Et xi *.—26, 7 10. Et ix *.—26, 7 19. Et iiii *.—26, 7 25. Et x *.—26, 7 30. Et ii *.—26, 7 38. Et vi *.—26, 7 44. Ibi vi *.—26, 7 50. Ibi i *.—27, 7 S. Etii*.—27,7 16. Et x *.—27, 7 22. Et iii *.—27, 7 28. Ibi iii *.—27, 7 33. Ibi iiii *.—27, 7 39. Et x *.—27, 7 47. Et iii *.—28, 7 5. Et i *.—28, 10. iiii V. cum viii *.—28, 7 17. Et iiii *.—28, 7 23. Ibi iiii *.—28, 7 27. Et vi *.—28, 7 36. Et vii *.—28, 7 42. Et v *.—28, 7 47. Et x *.—29, 7 4. Et xi *.—29, 716. Et v *.—29, 7 24. Et xviii *.—29, 7 32. Et iiii *.—29, 7 41. Et ii «.—29, 7 46. Et viii *.—29, 7 50. Et viii a. —30, 7 12. Et x *.—30,717. Et iiii *.—30, 7 22. Et ii *.—30, 7 26. Et vii*.—30, 7 30. Ibi ii *.—30, 7 35. Et v *.—30,7 41. Ibi v *.—30, 7 46. Et ii *.—31,7 8. Cum iii*.—31, 7 13. Et ii *.—31, 7 19. Et ii *.—31, 7 23. Ibi xii*.—31, 7 34. Et vi *.—31, 7 40. Et ii *.—31, 7 45. Et xv *.—32, 7 5. Et vi *.—32,7 17. Et xii s.—32, 7 26. Ibi v *.—32, 7 38. Cum ii s.—32, 7 42. Et vii *.—32, 7 49. Cum ix *.—33, 7 1. Et xiiii *.—33, 7 5. Ibi iii *.—33,717. Ibi xii *.—33, 7 22. Cum v *.—33, 7 27. Cum v a. —33, 7 31. Et xvi *.—33, 7 36. Ibi ii *.—33,7 44. Et iiii *.—33, 7 51. Ibi xx *.—34, 710. Ibi iiii *.—34,717. Et ii V. cum iiii *.—34, 7 31. Et ix *.—35, 7 3. Et uno a. —35, 7 7. Et iiii *.—35, 710. Et unus *.—35, 718. Et v *.—35, 7 24. Et vi *.—35, 7 32. Et viii *.—35, 7 40. Cum i *.—35, in margine. Ibi iii *.—36, 7 20. Ibi iiii *.—36, 7 41. CONCORDANCE. SER Et viii 87, 7 4. Ibi ii 4.—37, 7 22. Et vi s.—38, 717. Ibi v 4.-38, 7 4S. Et ii 4.-39, 7 13. Ibi viii s.— 39, 7 27. Et ii a.— 39, 7 33. Et v 4.-39, 7 42. Et xxviii a. —40,712. Et vi «.—40, 7 17. Ibi i 5.-40, 7 27. Et iii s.—40, 7 32. Et iii 5.-40, 7 37. Et ii 5.-41, 7 2. Et ix s.—41, 7 11. Ibi iii s.—41, 7 19. Et ii 5.-41, 7 29. Ibi ii 5.-41, 7 47. Ibi ii s.—42,7 51. Et ii 5.-43, 716. Et ii 5.-44, 7 9. Ibi unus s.—44, 7 50. Ibi iiii 5.-45, 7 34. Et vii 5.-45, 7 40. Ibi i 5.-46, 7 12. Et xiiii 5.-47, 7 9. Ibi sunt ii 5.-47, 7 38. Et ii s.—48, 7 15. Ibi iii 5.-49, 7 43. Ibi x 5.-50, 7 6. Ibi ii s.—50, 7 18. Et iii 5.-50, 7 26. Et unus 5.-51, 7 3. Et ixs.—51, 7 46. Et vii s.—52, 7 37. Et iii s.—53, 7 10. Et viii 0 5.-53, 7 27. Ibi unus 5.-53, 7 38. Et ii s.—53, 7 46. Et viii 5.-54, 71. Et unus 5.—54, 7 5. Ibi unus 5.-54, 7 11. Ibi x 5.—54, 7 31. Et xvii 5.-54, 7 37. Et xv 5.-55, 7 5. Ibi xiii 5.—55, 7 12. Et vii s.—65, 7 20. Et is.-55, 7 33. Et ii 5.-56, 7 9. STOUT, SICUTI. si cud. de Gribrige.—3, 713. sicut superius scriptuin.—3, 7 43. aicuti jus esset.—7, 7 38. Alleces s. prius.—10,7 13. s. bundredum testificatur.—56, 719. SILVA. Mille neno s. infruotuosae.—6, 711. De 5. viii dense parne, et iii magnte.— 8,7 7. Et qumdam 5.—8, 7 27. 5. lxx porcorura.—8, 7 35. 5. ccxx povcoruin.—9, 7 2. De s. regis liabet Wadardus.—9, 7 13. 5. c porcorum. Et de pasture 5. xxxi solidi et ii denarii.—9, 7 22. 5. xx porcorum.—10, 7 20. 5 . cl porcorum.—10, 7 26. 5. xxx porcorum.—10, 7 29. 5. Lx porcorum.—10, 7 36. s. c porcorum.—10, 7 43. s. xl porcorum.—11, 7 2. 5. Lx porcorum.—11, 7 9. s. xx porcorum.—11, 7 16. 5., quando fructificat, quingentorum porcorum.—11, 7 23. s. xxx porcorura.—11, 7 40. 5. xxiii porcorum.—11, 7 45. s. xx porcorum.—12, 7 6. 5. xx porcorum.—12, 716. s. 1 porcorum.—12, 7 23. Una parva dena 5.—12, 7 30. s. xx porcorum.—12, 7 36. s. 1 porcorum:—12, 7 48. s. x porcorum.—13, 7 5. s. xv porcorum, de lierbagio, xxvii de¬ narii.—13, 7 13. 5. xlv porcorum.—13, 7 19. 5. xxvi porcorum.—13, 7 26. 5. cxl porcorum.—13, 7 32. 5. v porcorum, et ii silvuke ad clausu- ram.—13, 7 39. 5. xxx porcorum.—13, 7 51. s. lx porcorum.—14, 7 7. Et parva s.—14,7 14. SIL 5. x porcorum.—14, 7 30. 5. c porcorum.—14, 7 35. 5 . xi porcorum.—14, 7 41. s. xl porcorum.—14, 7 45. s. xx porcorum. Et Ricardus de Tone- brige de eadem 5. tanturidem habet in sua leuga.—15, 7 5. 5 . xx porcorum.—15,7 13. Tantuin s. unde exire possunt xx porci. —15, 7 15. 5. xi porcorum.—15, 7 21. 5 . quater xx porcorum et de lierbagio ix solidi et vi denarii.—15, 7 26. 5. quater xx porcorum.—15, 7 34. 5. xvi porcorum.—15, 7 40. 5. v porcorum.—15, 7 45. s. de x porcis.—16,7 5. 5. quater viginti porcorum.—16, 7 21. 5 . xx porcorum.—16, 7 27. v denffi 5. de 1 porcis.—17, 7 5. 5. x porcorum.—17, 712. 5. x porcorum.—17, 7 16. 5. xl porcorum.—17, 7 21. 5. x porcorum.—17, 7 28. 5. xx porcorum.—17, 7 30. s. cxv porcorura.—17, 7 35. 5. xxx porcorum.—17, 7 38. s. de xii denariis.—17, 7 45. s. x porcorum.—18,7 1. s. xxx porcorum.—18, 7 6. s. xxx porcorum.—18, 7 14. s. x porcorum.—18, 7 19. 5. v porcorum.—18, 7 24. 5. xxv porcorum.—18, 7 29. s. xl porcorum.—18, 7 35. 5 . c porcorum.—18, 7 40. xv porcorum.—18, 7 45. 5. xx porcorura.— IS, 7 48. 5. quater viginti porcorum.—19, 7 4. 5 . x porcorum.—19, 7 12. s. ad clausuram.—19, 7 21. s. vi porcorum.—19, 7 30. s. vi porcorum.—19, 7 36. s. x porcorum.—19, 7 42. 5. x porcorum.—20, 7 5. Tantuin de s. et de terra.—20, 7 8. s. lx porcorum.—20, 7 13. Tautum s. quod valet xx solidos.—20, 7 16. 5 . xxx porcorum.—20, 7 20. s. c porcorum.—20, 7 28. s. xx porcorum.—20, 7 34. s. xx porcorum.—20, 7 39. s. x porcorum.—20, 7 44. s. iiii porcorum.—20, 7 49. s. xv porcorum.—21, 7 8. 5 . v porcorum.—21, 713. 5. v porcorum.—21, 7 18. Uua dena 5. de v porcis.—22, 7 6. s. iii porcorum.—22, 7 12. De s. M. tenet Ricardus in sua leuua quod valet iiii solidos.—22, 714. s. x porcorum.—22, 7 19. s. viii porcorum et xvi denariorum plus. —22, 7 28. Una dena 5.—22, 7 33. s. xx porcorum.—22, 7 48. s. v porcorum.—23, 717. Rex habet s. pro novo dono episcopi, et valet iii solidos.—23, 7 18. 5. v porcorum.—23, 7 24. s. viii porcorum, et xvi denariorum.— 23, 7 31. 5 . x porcorum et xiiii denariorum.—23, 7 36. Rex liabet de s. quod valet viii solidos. —23, 7 37. s. iii porcorum.—23, 7 42. 5 . iii porcorum.—24, 7 2. Rex habet pro novo dono episcopi tantum 5. de isto M. quod valet v solidos.—24, 7 3. 5. v porcorum.—24, 7 8. s. xv porcorum.—24, 7 12. s. xx porcorum.—24, 719. s. iii porcorum.—24, 7 26. s. v porcorum.—24, 7 31. s. iii porcorum.—24, 7 37. s. x porcorum.—24,7 42. 5. x porcorum.—24, 7 48. Una 5. de x porcis.—25, 7 2. s. Ixxv porcorum.—25, 7 8. 5. vii porcorum.—25,7 18. 5. x porcorum.—25, 7 25. SIL s. 1 porcorum.—25, 7 31. s. xv porcorum.—25, 7 36. s. x porcorum.—25, 7 41. s. v porcorum.—25, 7 45. a. vi porcorum.—26, 7 1. s. xl porcorum.—26, 7 11. Ibi s. v porcorum.—26, 7 14. a. viii porcorum.—26, 7 20. Et 4. lx porcorum.—26, 7 25. 4'. 1 porcorum.—26, 7 31. a. viii porcorum.—26, 7 39. a. vi porcorum.—26, 7 45. a. x porcorum.—27, 7 8. a. v porcorum.—27, 7 23. s. x porcorum.—27, 7 29. a. ii porcorum.—27, 7 39. a. x porcorum.—27, 7 48. v solidos in uua a. —28, 7 6. s. xx porcorum.—28, 7 11. a. iii porcorum.—28, 7 23. a. x porcorum.—28, 7 28. a. xl porcorum.—2S, 7 38. a. xx porcorum.—28, 7 43. a. x porcorum.—28, 7 49. a. lx porcorum.—29, 7 5. a. ii porcorum.—29,711. a. xv porcorum.—29, 7 17. a. ii porcorum.—29, 7 28. 4. xx porcorum.—29, 7 33. 4. x porcorum.—29, 7 42. 4. xv porcorum.—29, 7 46. 4. xl porcorum.—30, 7 1. 4.1 porcorum.—30, 7 8. 4 . 1 porcorum.—30, 712. 4.1 porcorum.—30, 7 18. 4. xx porcorum.—30, 7 23. 4. iiii porcorum.—30, 7 26. 4. xxv porcorum.—30, 7 31. 4. v porcorum.—30, 7 35. 4. iiii porcorum.—30, 7 41. 4. xv porcorum.—30, 7 47- 4. xx porcorum.—31, 7 3. 4. x porcorum.—31, 7 8. 4. v porcorum.—31, 7 13. 4. iiii porcorum.—31, 7 19. 4.. viii porcorum.—31, 7 24. 4. xx porcorum.—31, 7 35. 4. xl porcorum.—31, 7 41. 4. vi porcorum.—31, 7 46. 4 . i porci.—32, 7 6. 4. i porci.—32, 7 12. 4. xxx porcorum.—32, 7 27. 4. xx porcorum.—32, 7 33. 4. vi porcorum.—32,7 43. 4. xv porcorum.—32, 7 50. 4. iiii porcorum.—33, 71. 4. xxxv porcorum.—33, 7 6. 4. ii porcorum.—33, 712. 4. ii porcorum.—33, 7 18. 4. xx porcorum.—33, 7 23. 4. vi porcorum.—33, 7 28. 4. iii porcorum.—33, 7 32. 4.1 porcorum.—33, 7 37. 4. vi porcorum.—33, 7 40. 4. v porcorum.—33, 7 44. 4.1 porcorum.—33, 7 47. 4. x porcorum.—34, 7 17. 4. x porcorum.—35, 7 3. 4 . iiii porcorum.—35.711. 4. iiii porcorum.—35, 7 20. 4. xx porcorum.—35, 7 24. 4. ii porcorum.—35, 7 28. a. vi porcorum et dim.—35, 7 34. 4. iiii porcorum.—35, 7 41. 4. quater xx porcorum.—35, 7 48. xvi aerm 4. minutffi.—36, 7 11. 4. xl porcorum.—36, 7 22. 4. vi porcorum.—36, 7 27. 4. iii porcorum.—36, 7 42. 4. c porcorum.—37, 7 5. 4. xx porcorum.—38, 7 3. 4. x porcorum.—38, 7 7. 4. vi porcorum.—38, 713. 4. lx porcorum.—38, 717. 4. xl porcorum.—38, 7 22. 4. quater xx porcorum.—38, 7 30. 4. de quater xx porcis.—38, 7 38. 4. est; sed nil reddit.—38, 7 48. 4. iiii porcorura.—39,7 14. 4. xx porcorum.—39, 7 43. 4 . xxx porcorum.—40, 7 12. c acra 4. minutffi.—40, 7 28. 4. x porcorum.—40, 7 32. 4. v porcorum.—40, 7 42. SIL 4. xl porcorum.—40, 7 48. Inter 4. et pasturam.—40, 7 49. 4. vii porcorum.—41, 7 3. 4. lx porcorum.—41, 7 12. 4. x porcorum.—41,7 29. 4.1 porcorum.—41, 7 41. 4. v porcorum.—42, 7 8. 4 . iiii porcorum.—42, / 28. 4. x porcorum.—42, 7 56. 4. x porcorum.—44, 7 19. 4.1 porcorum.—44, 7 24. 4. x porcorum.—45, 7 27- Et 4. i porci.—45, 7 34. Et 4. ccc porcorum de pasnagio.—45, 7 41. 4 . v porcorum de pasnagio.—46, 7 6. 4 . xl porcorum.—46,7 13. 4 . de v porcis.—46, 7 20. 4. iiii porcorum.—46, 7 33. v porci de pasnagio a. —47, 7 32. 4. x porcorum.—47, 7 36. 4. x porcorum.—47, 7 48. 4. x porcorum.—48, 7 7. Et 4. iiii porcorum.—48, 7 32. Ibi 4. minuta.—48, 7 45. 4. xv porcorum.—49, 7 18. 4. ii porcorum.—49, 7 22. Tantum 4. uiule exeunt de pasnagio xl porci, aut liiii denarii et unus obolus. —49, 7 30. De 4.1 porci de pasnagio.—49, 7 45. Et4_—50, 7 6. 4. de iii porcis de pasnagio.—50, 7 45. 4 . xl porcorum.—51,7 18. 4. xl porcorum.—51, 7 47. 4 . de vi porcis.—52, 7 6. 4. x porcorum.—52, 712. 4. vi porcorum.—52, 7 22. De 4. i porous.—52, 7 27. De 4. vi porci.—52, 7 32. 4. de xxv porcis,—53, 7 28. i 4. de v porcis.—53, 7 42. 4. viii porcorum.—54,71. 4. reddens v denarios de pasnagio.—54, 7 5. Et de 4., e porci.—54, 7 32. 4. cc porcorum.—54, 7 39. 4. cl porcorum.—55, 7 7. 4. x porcorum.—55, 7 13. Et 4. xxx porcorum.—55, 7 22. Tantum 4. unde exeunt lx porci de pasnagio.—55, 7 34. iii dense de 4 . reddentes xxx porcos de pasnagio.—56, 7 8. Tantum 4. unde exeunt xl denarii per annum.—56, 7 24. SILVAT1CA. Parcus 4. bestiaruin.—30, 7 13. SILVULA. ii 4. ad clausuram.—13, 7 39. Et 4. ad clausuram.—37, 7 22. Et parva a. —44, 7 2S. Ibi parva 4.—48, 7 50. 4 . parva ad clausuram.—56,710. SIMILES. Alnodi cild et 4. ejus.—3, 7 36. SIMILITER. Tenuit in prebenda 4.—4, 7 39. Tenuit in prebenda a. —5, 7 26. 4. de callibus rectis extra.—6, 7 36. Quando recepit 4.—6, 7 48. Modo 4.-7, 716. Et modo 4.—9, 7 5. 4. quando recepit. —11, 7 10. Quando recepit a. —12, 7 IS. Quando recepit a, —13, 7 40. Et modo 4.—14, 7 37. Quando recepit, 4. —19, 7 24. Et modo 4 .—22, 7 42. Et modo, 4 .—29, 7 8. 4 . quando recepit.—29, 7 34. Quaudo recepit, 4 .—32, 7 28. Quando recepit, a. —37, 7 46. Modo, xxx libras, a. —38, 7 31. Modo 4 .—40, 7 20. Et post, et modo, 4 .—51, 7 40. SIMUL. Habent 4 . iii canonici.—7, 7 2. Id est 4 . ccclxxxiii.—10, 7 14. SINGULI. Divisffi per 4 .—4, 7 15. 4 . annis.—7, 7 29. 4. annis.—7, 7 38. 4 . annis.—7,7 41. CONCORDANCE. soc SOCA (v. SAGA). SOCHMANNUS. Sex s. teunerunt T.R.E.—42, 7 5. Duo «. tenuerunt T.R.E. sine aulis et dominiis.—42, 7 12. Hanc temrn tenuit unus s. et, de novo dono episcopi, liabet, in mauu regis, de Ricardo filio Gisleberti, x Y. cum iii car.—44, 7 22. Tenet uuam denam et unam .T. de terra a. liujus M., reddens de consuetudine vi denarios.—45, 7 47. Medietatem liujus terra: tenuerunt ii s. Et ii V. alia in .—50, 7 31. Dim. J. cpiod tenuit i s. —50, 7 34. Ibi xiiii a. liabent iii car.—51, 7 6. Duo s. tenuerunt.—51, 7 9. Unus a. tenuit.—51, 712. xii a. tenueruut, et tenent.—51, 7 35. Ibi xii a. cum viii B. babentes ii car.— 51, 7 39. Dim. J. quod tenuerunt v a. Et modo tenent, habentes ibi i car. cum iiii B.—51, 7 49. Quas tenuerunt iii a. de rege E.—52, 716. Tenuerunt xi a. —52, 7 20. Duo s. tenuerunt de rege E.—52, 7 30. Quod tenuit unus a. de rege E.—52, 7 40. Quod tenuit unus a. —52, 7 44. Quod tenuit quidam a. de rege E.—52, 7 47. Unus a. tenens xvi acras terra:.—53, 713. Quam i s. tenuit de rege E.—53, 7 31. Unus a. tenuit de rege E.—53, 7 45. Sex a. tenuerunt de rege E.—54,710. Tennit unus a. de rege E.—54, 7 24. SOLEBANT. a. esse legatonun regis.—6, 710. SOLID L (v. etiam sub APPRECIO, EXEO, HABEO, MOLENDI.XUM, MOLINUS, PASTURA, PI8CA- RIA, PRATUM, REDDO,SALINA, et VALEO). Solvet regi c a. —3, 7 7. c a. emendabit.—3, 7 9. Per c a. emendabit.—3, 714. Rex c a. liabebit.—3, 7 42. Habet vicecomes ex a. —6, 715. liabet singulis minis lv a. —7, 7 29. xlvii libras vi a. et iiii denarios.—7, 7 39. Per quoddam vadimonium xl s.—8, 7 28. De Theloneo xl a. —9, 7 2. 1 a. pro Ineuuardo et averis.—9, 7 3. xl a. de iiii S. regis exeunt ei.—9,716. liabent omni anno xx a. —11, 7 49. Quod tenet Franeigena xl a. —12, 710. De xl a. v denariis minus.—14, 7 45. De herbagio ix s. et vi denarii.—15, 7 26. De his liabent monaclii Cantuarienses xx a.— 15, 7 60. Tenet v a. in una silva.—27, 7 6. liabet ix a. et x denarios.—28, 714. Dat xl a. per annum.—35, 7 45. De quibus habet lv a. —36, 7 20. v hagie de vii a. et x denariis.—40, 7 IS. /Ecclesiu de xii a. —47, 7 8. De exitu portus xl s.—49, 7 44. Est ad firmarn pro lx a. —56, 7 6. Pertinent x libra: et x a. —56, 715. Et lviii a. de gablo.—56, 7 17. SOLINUM, SOLINUS, SOLIN (vide etiam sub Cak.). Habebant xxi a. —-4,7 10. llabebant iii a. —4, 7 12. Ilia iiii a. habent.—7,7 15. cccc acra et dim., qua: Hunt ii s. et dim.—7,7 31. xxiiii a. lime adquietant.—7, 7 33. Qua: se defendit pro dim. a. —8, 7 22. viii a. qui erant, cum aliis a. in consue¬ tudine.—9, 7 6. xl solidi de iiii s. regis exeunt ei.—9, 717. Dim. a. S ci M. et aliud dim. a. valebant iiii libras.—14, 7 IS. Jacet in vi a. de Holingeborne.—15, 38. SOL Tenet i homo arcliiepiscopi dim. a .— 17, 713. Et cum his vi a. geldabat.—17, 713. Dim. a. quidem nunquam reddidit Scot. —17, 7 23. Modo se defendit pro v a.—20, 7 5. Excepto isto dim. a. tenet dim. J. in eadem villa, quod nunquam se quie- tavit apud regem.—23, 7 25. Se defendebat T.R.E. pro x a. Modo, pro iiii a.— 24, 7 21. Hi ii a. fuerunt ii M.—25, 7 26. Pro i a. et i J. se defendit.—26, 7 3. De hoc M. habet dim. a.— 29, 7 36. De isto M. habet unus homo i a., et vocatur Merlea.—30,7 24. Tenet dim. a. —32, 7 32. De isto a. teuet i J. de episcopo.—32, 7 51. De istis a. quos habet.—35,713. Et iii a., et unum J. et dim., quos abs- tidit villanis regis.—35, 714. Dim. a. libenc teme.—35, 7 52. De terra qua: data est ab his a. ad fir- mam.—36, 7 43. De isto a. tenet i J. et dim.—41, 7 3. Habuit dim. a. et dim. J.—41, 7 4. Tenebant ii a. in paragio.—43, 7 31. Tenet i a. vacua: teme.—44, 7 2. Tenet ii partes unius a. reddens xii de¬ narios.—45, 7 48. Dim. a. quod semper fuit quietiun.—47, 7 25. Tenet dim. a., et xi acras prati, de terra V.—48, 7 21. Dim. a. de dominio monachoruin.—49, 7 8. Cum his iiii a. habet i J.—49, 7 28. Tenet dim. a. sine halla.—51, 7 22. Tenet dim. a. in Maresch.—51, 7 34. Tenet dim. a. —52, 7 24. Pro ii a. se defendebat. Modo pro uno.—53, 7 8. Habet dim. a. S van ETON e.— 53, 7 40. Dim. a., unam virgam minus.—54, 7 9. Tenet dim. s.—54, 7 15. T.R.E. pro i a. et dim. Modo pro uno a. et iii J.—55, 7 IS. Se defendit pro vii a. et dim.—56, 7 5. De xxviii a. pertinent.—56, 7 14. De alia parte de novem a. pertinent.— 56, 7 15. lviii solidi de gablo de his novem a. et de his a. reddebat averain.—56,717. SOLYO. a. regi e solidos.—3, 7 7. SOT. Seuuard s. tenuit T.R.E.—23, 7 20. STICA. ii a. anguillaram.—3, 7 45. STIREMANNUM. Burgenses inveniebant a. —2,7 11. STO.. arborem a. extra viam.—3, 7 5. STRICTIOR. Pro quo a. fiat via.—3, 7 5. SUMMA. xlvii salirne de 1 a. salis.—47, 7 9. Et unam a. farinas.—47, 7 28. SUMO. De hac prebenda a. —5, 7 9. SUPER. a. aquam regis.—2, 7 39. Habet rex a. omnes alodiarios.—3,715. Et a. homines ipsorum.—3, 7 1.6. a. istos habet rex.—3, 7 21. s. lnec habet.—12, 718. Calumniantur a. Hugonem.—50, 7 38. SUPERIORA. Ubi et a.— 7, 7 36. SUPERIUS. Sicut a. seriptum.—3, 7 43. SUPRAD1CTUS. Ilia iiii solina a. —7, 7 15. Milites *.—36, 7 50. SUPRASCRIPTUM. Sandwic, a. est, pertinet.—19, 7 47. TANTUM. t. prati quantum pertinet.—8, 7 17. 7. de liae terra tenet.—8, 7 41. Habet 7. quod reddit.—9, 7 13. Tenet 7. silva: unde.—15, 714. Pro 7. se defendebat.—15, 717. Modo pro ii 7.—15, 7 31. TAN 7. quod valet vii libras.—18,7 8. 7. de silva et de terra.—20, 7 8. 7. silva: quod valet.—20, 716. Modo pro ii 7.—21,7 2. 7. silva: quod valet v solidos.—24, 7 3. Pro 7. se defendit.—41, 7 49. Pro 7. se defendit.—42, 7 2 et 710. Et 7. valet.—45, 719. 7. quod valet.—46, 7 35. 7. de terra V. quod valet.—47, 7 4. 7. silva: unde exeunt.—49, 7 29. Pro 7. se defendit.—50, 7 47. Pro 7. se defendit.—51, 7 6. Pro 7. se defendit.—51, 7 35. Pro 7. se defendit.—51, 7 38. Pro 7. se defendit.—52, 7 44. Pro 7. se defendit.—53, 7 41. Pro 7. se defendit.—54, 710. Pro 7. se defendit.—54, 7 16. 7. silvse unde exeimt.—55, 7 34. 7. silvse unde exeunt.—56, 7 24. TANTUNDEM. 7. quando recepit.—6, 7 12. T.R.E. 7. reddidernnt.—7, 7 26. 7. quando vicecomes recepit.—8, 7 9. 7. quando recepit.—8, 7 36. 7. quando recepit.—9, 7 5. 7. quando recepit.—11, 7 3. Et modo 7.—11, 710. Et post, 7.—12, 7 25. Et post 7.—12, 7 38. Quando recepit, 7.—13, 7 27. Et 7. quando recepit.—14, 7 8. 7. habet in sua leuua.—15, 7 6. 7. quando recepit.—15, 7 28. Et post, 7.—17, 7 39. Quando recepit 7.—19,7 6. Quando recepit, 7.-24, 7 27. Et modo, 7.—24, 7 32. Quando recepit, 7.—2S, 718. Quando recepit, 7.—28, 7 44. 7. quando recepit.—30,71. Et post, 7.—30, 7 27. Et modo, 7.—32, 7 29. Et 7. semper valuit.—39, 7 38. Et post, et modo 7.—40, 7 49. 7. reddentes.—47, 718. TEIGNI. De hoc M. tenent iii 7. i S. et dim.— 10, 7 27. Appreciatur D. 7. xii libris.—10, 7 31. Hoc M. tenuerunt... 7. de rege E.; et iii manebant ibi assidui... tenebant inde ii S. in paragio; sed non... nt ibi.—43, 7 31. Tenent de ipso Osberno x 7.—43, 7 40. Tres 7. tenuerunt de rege E.—44,7 11. Goduinus tenuit de rege E. Et alii v 7.-44, 7 15. TEMPUS. 7. regis Edwardi (v. etiam T.R.E. pas¬ sim).—2,7 1. Ulo 7.-48, 7 30. TENEO. 7. hue usque consuetudinem regis.—2, 7 40. Qui 7. nunc reddit.—6, 713. Qui placitum 7.—6, 7 47. Qui 7. reddit xl libras.—6, 7 49. ienentea terras in Client.—7, 7 49. Qui 7. ad firmam.—8,7 11. Qui 7. reddit cxl libras, etc.—9, 710. Dim. denam 7. quam T.R.E. quidam villanum tenuit. —9, 714. Quas 7. clerici de villa.—10, 7 3. Tainen qui 7. M. reddit xviii libras.— 10, 7 22. De hoc M. 7. quidam franeigena terrain ad i car.—12,7 7. 7. de archiepiscopo ad gablum.—17, 7 24. Quod milites 7. valet xi libras. Tamen reddunt xiii libras.—19, 7 27. Reddit qui 7. xiii libras et xx denarios. —21, 7 33. ii hominibus qui eum 7. de episcopo.— 21, 7 35. In hoc M. 7. unus homo xx acras terra: valentes per annum v solidos ncc pertinet ad ilium M., neqne potuit habere dominura prater regem.—22, 7 9. Qui 7. reddit.—24, 7 21. Qui 7. reddit.—24, 7 32. TEN Qui 7. reddit.—24, 7 44. 7. ad firmam de rege.—27,7 36 ct 7 42. 7. ad firmam.—31, 7 26 et 7 31. 7. ad firmam de episcopo.—32, 7 2. Tamen qui eum 7. reddit.—32, 7 29. Robertus 7. ad firmam.—33, 7 20,7 26, et 7 34. Tamen qui 7. reddit.—34, 71. 7. Osuuardus ad gablum.—35, 714. 7. Rannulfus ad firmam.—35, 7 37. 7. iii villani ad firmam.—39, 7 37. 7. ad firmam de rege.—42,718. 7. ad firmam de rege W.—43, 719. TERRA (v. etiam sub Cak.). De ilia masura ... dim. 7. est regis.— 2, 7 36. Rclevationem 7.—3,7 17. Excepta 7. S'" T., etc.—3,7 18. De his 7., Goslaches, etc.—3, 7 24. Excepta 7. S'" T., etc.—3, 7 32. De 7. supra nominatis.—3, 7 36. Et in 7. Sophis.—3, 7 46. Ila: 7. jacent in Wi.—3, 7 48. Homines de his 7.—3, 7 49. 7. canoniconun, etc.—4, 7 8. Ad hanc 7. pertinent xxv acne 7.—4, 7 30. Et adhuc xxv acras 7.—5, 7 5. Hanc 7. tenuit Stigandus.—5, 7 12. 1 acra 7. ad Delam.—-5,713. xxxiii acras 7. in gildam suam.—6,7 20. Has domos et hanc 7. tenet.—6, 7 21. Ixxx acras 7. super hiec.—6, 7 22. v acras 7. qua: pertinent.—6, 7 23. Excepta 7. mcclesire, etc.—6, 7 32. Utraque parte ubi 7. sua est.—6, 7 42. In 7. S™ T., etc.—6, 7 43. Utraque mcelesi® in sua 7.—6, 7 47. In hac 7. sunt iiii V., etc.—7, 7 3. In Brensete paululam 7.—7, 7 13. 7. Nordewode, et 7. Ripe, et 7. Brandet. —7,7 17. Communi 7. S ci M.—7, 7 31. Hare 7. nunquam reddidit, etc.—7, 7 32. In hac 7. sunt iii Y. et ix B.—7, 7 37. Teuentes 7. in Chent.—7, 7 49. 7. Regis.—8,7 1. xx acra 7.-8, 7 16. Tautuin prati quantum pertinet ad x acras 7.-8, 717. Hanc 7. tenebat vicecomes.—8, 7 22. Cum liiii acris 7. plus.—8, 7 25. Adhuc stmt ablate vi acra: 7.—8, 7 26. Tantum 7. quod appreciatur.—8, 7 39. Pro excambio 7. in qua castellum.—S, 7 40. Tantum de hac 7. tenet.—8, 7 41. Htec 7. quam tenet.—9, 7 9. 7. archiepiscopi.—10, 71. 7. ad i carucam.—12, 7 7. Unum J. et xii acres 7.—12, 7 28. Ad hanc 7. pertinent.—14, 7 13. 7. militum ejus.—15,71. Hte 7. valebant.—16, 716. 7. Monachorum Archiepiscopi.—17,71. De 7. liujus M.—17, 7 13. Quia libera 7. erat.—17,714. De 7. liujus M.—17, 7 36. De 7. liujus M.—18,7 8. De 7. hujus M.—18, 7 47. De 7. hujus M.—19, 7 22. De hac 7. habet i J.—19, 7 46. 7. Episcopi Rovecestre.—20,7 1. Ixxx mausuras teme. —21, 7 26. 7. Episcopi Baioceusis.—22, 71. xx acras 7. valentes per annum v so¬ lidos.—22, 7 8. Et 7. ad unam carucam.—22, 7 39. 7. est ibidem ad unam car.—22, 7 41. Una 7. vocatur Didele et alia So- ninges.—22, 7 41. Teuet dim. J. 7.—23, 7 6. 7. est iii bourn.—23, 7 7. Potuit cum 7. sua verterc se quo vo- luit.—23, 7 9. Tenuit T.R.E. et potuit se vertere cum 7. sua quo voluit.—23, 7 21. Potuit se vertere cum hac 7. quo voluit. —24, 7 5. Ha: du® 7. fuerunt ii M.—25, 7 20. Hanc 7. tenuerunt pro ii M.—25, 7 46. Teuuit hanc 7. pro ii M.—26, 7 6. Hanc 7. tenuerunt T.R.E. duo homines in paragio.—27, 7 3. '4 CONCORDANCE. TER Cum t. sua vertere quo voluerunt.-—27, < 4. Tenet de episcopo i J. libera t. —29, < 23. iii mansiones t. in Rouecestre.—30, < 3. ii rnausur® t. in Cantuaria.—30, < 37. Potuit ire cum t. sua quo voluit.—31, <10. Qusedam libera t. ad iii boves.—31, < 36. Hanc t. tenuerunt pro tribus M.—33, < 25. Hanc <. tenuerunt pro ii M.—33, < 48. Hanc t. tenuerunt pro ii M.—34, <14. Sunt adhuc xxx acra t. —34, < 26. Pastura, unde araverunt extranei ho¬ mines vi acras t. —35, < 20. Dim. S. libera t. —35, < 52. Has t. tenuerunt burgenses.—36,<13. ix S. de t. V.—36, < 23. Tenet de hoc M. iii J., et xii acras t. — 36, l 28. Tenet i S., et xl acras t. —36, < 30. i S., et i J., et vi acras t. —36, < 36. De una dena et de t. quae data est ab bis S. ad firmam, exeunt.—36, l 43. Tenet Iviii acras t. —36, < 47. Hanc t. tenuerunt ii liberi homines.— 37, < 29. t. cujusdam Rannulfi militis.—37, < 49. De t. hujus M. tenet.—38, < 39. Tenet quidam miles t. ad i car.—38, < 49. Potuit ire quo voluit cum <.—40, < 8. Hsec t. est in mauu regis.—41, < 6. Hanc t. tenuerunt.—41, < 6. Uuum J. <., et una virga.—41, < 15. Hsec t. est de feudo episcopi Baiocensis. —41, < 24. Tenet xii acras <.—41, < 32. Poterant ire quolibet cum t. suis.—41, < 37. H;ec t. est extra divisionem.—42,<16. Tenet xvii acras t. —42, < 31. De line t. tenet i S. —43, < 7. i S. vacuse t. —44, l 2. Defendit se cnm t. Osberti.—44, < 6. Misit t. eorum in unuin M.—44, <16. Tenet vi acras t. —44, <22. Hanc t. tenuit unus sochmannus. —44, < 23. De hac t. liabet dim. S.—44, < 42. Tenet xl acras t. —45, <17. t. iceclesne de La Batailge. —45, <36. De t. sochmannorum.—45, < 46. t. cecclesim S cl A.—46, < 1. Dim. S. et xlii acris t. —46, < 37. Tantum de t. V.—47, < 4. Quando pax est in <.—47, < 5. c masura <., iiii minus.—47, <17. xxiiii acra <. quas semper habuit.—47, < 20. In isto Burgo tenet vii masuras t. —47, < 22 . Ibidem iiii acra <.—47, < 26. De <. V. hujus M.—48, < 10. De eadem l. V. tenet.—48, <12. iii S. lx acras minus, de <. Villanorum. —48, < 14. Tenet de eadem t. Villanorum.—48, l 18. Tenet de eadem t. Villanorum.—48, < 20. Tenet dim. S., et xi. acras prati, de <. Villanorum.—48, < 21. t. quam tenent monachi.—48, < 28. t. qme T.It.E. semper geldavit.—48, < 29. liabet xxv acras de hac <.—4S, < 46. 1 label iii virgas <.—49, 1 13. t. Sancti Petri de Gand.—49, l 39. t. Hugouis de Montfort.—50, < 1. Ire quolibet cum t. suis.—50, < 21. Medictatem hujus t. —50, <31. ILec <. valuit et valet.—50, < 33. Iiit'c <. appreciatur in Titentonf, quia illuc arata est ciun dominicis caiTucis. —50, < 35. t . Etketone quam calumniantur cano- nici. —50, < 37. Use du. vii solidos.—34, 7 2. Quffi v. 1 denarios.—34, 7 5. T.R.E. v . xii libras. Et post, vi libras. Modo, xv libras.—34, 713. T.R.E., et post, v . xl solidos. Modo, iiii libras.—34, 718. t>. vii solidos.—34, 719. T.R.E., et post, v. x solidos. Modo, xv solidos.—34, 7 24. T.R.E., et post, v. xl solidos. Modo, iii libras.—34, 7 28. T.R.E. v. xx solidos. Quando recepit, xxx solidos. Modo, xl solidos.—34, 7 32. T.R.E., et post, v. xxx solidos.—34, 7 36. T.R.E., et post, v. 1 solidos. Modo, lx solidos.—34, 7 40. T.R.E., et post, et modo v. xx solidos. —34, 7 43. T.R.E., et post, v . xx solidos. Modo, xxx solidos.—34, 7 46. T.R.E., et post, v. x solidos. Modo, xxx solidos.—34, 7 49. T.R.E., et post, v. vii libras. Modo, viii libras.—35, 7 4. v. vi libras.—35, 7 8. T.R.E., et post, v. vii libras. Modo, x libras et x solidos.—35,712. T.R.E. v. xviii libras. Quando recepit, x libras. Modo, xix libras.—35,721. T.R.E. v. vii libras. Et post, c solidos. Modo, vii libras. Tamen reddit x libras.—35, 7 25. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, et modo, xl solidos.—35, 7 29. T.R.E. v. xii libras. Et post, vii libras. Modo, xii libras. Tamen reddit xviii libras. Quando Hugo de Montfort tenuit v. v solidos.—35, 7 35. T.R.E. v. vi libras. Et post, iiii lit Modo, c solidos.—35, 7 41. T.R.E. v. xxv libras. Quando recepit, xx libras. Modo, xxx libras.—35, 7 49. v. xxx solidos.—35, in maryine. o. et semper v. lx solidos.—36, l 2. T.R.E., et post, et modo, v. iii libras- 36, l 9. VAL T.R.E. v. c solidos. Et post, vi libras. Et modo, ix libras.—36, 1 12. v. xx libras.—36, l 27- V. xxx solidos. — 36, l 29. t>. iiii libras.—36, l 31. v. xxx solidos.—36, l 33. v. iiii libras.—36, 7 35. v. 1 solidos.—36, 7 37. v. xx solidos.—36, 7 39. Inter totum v. ix libras.—36, 7 44. v. xxx solidos.—36, 7 46. v. x solidos.—36, 7 47. Totum Fulchestan T.R.E. v. cx libras. Quando recepit xl libras. Modo quod habet in D. v. c libras. Quod milites tenent v. xlv libras et x soli¬ dos.—36, 7 48. T.R.E., et post, v. xxx libras. Modo, xl. Tamen reddit 1 libras.—37, 7 6. v. et v. lioc semper x solidos.—37,710. T.R.E. v. xx solidos. Quando recepit, xxx solidos. Modo xl solidos.—37, 713. v. et v. semper x solidos.—37, 717. T.R.E. a. ix libras. Modo, xv.—37,7 22. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, et modo, xxx solidos.—37, 7 25. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xx soli¬ dos. Modo, c solidos.—37, 7 31. T.R. E., et post, v. iiii solidos. Modo, viii solidos.—37, 7 34. Totum Berea m T.R.E. v. xl libras. Quando recepit, similiter. Tamen reddebat ei c libras. Modo, per se, Berliam v . xl libras. Et Hucharn x libras. Quod Osbernus habet, vi libras. Et terra cujusdam Ranulti militis v. xl solidos.—37, 7 46. T.R.E. v. xxi solidos. Quando recepit, xii solidos. Modo, xxx solidos.—38, 7 4. T.R.E., et post, v. x solidos. Modo, xx solidos.—38, 7 8. T.R.E. v. iiii libras. Et post, lx soli¬ dos. Modo, c solidos.—38, 7 13. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xl soli¬ dos. Modo, c solidos.—38, 7 17. T.R.E. v. viii libras. Et post vi libras. Modo, xii libras.—38, 7 23. T.R.E. v. xl libras. Et post, xxx libras. Modo, xxx libras similiter. Tamen reddebat episcopo baiocensi lxxx li¬ bras et xl solidos.—38, 7 31. T.R.E. v. xx libras. Quando recepit, xv libras. Modo, xx libras.—38, 7 43. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xl soli¬ dos. Modo iiii libras.—38, 7 50. T.R.E. v. iiii libras. Et post, xl solidos. Modo, c solidos.—39, 7 5. T.R.E. v. 1 denarios. Modo, v. lx de¬ narios.—39,7 10. T.R.E. v . lx solidos. Et post, lx so¬ lidos. Modo, iiii libras.—39, 7 14. T.R.E., et post, et modo v. xvi solidos. —39, 719. T.R.E., et post, et modo, s. xxiiii soli¬ dos.—39, 7 23. T.R.E. v. iiii libras. Et post, iii libras. Et modo, lxx solidos.—39, 7 28. T.R.E. v. xx solidos. Et post, et modo, v. x solidos.—39, 7 30. T.R.E., et post, v. x solidos. Modo xxx solidos.—39, 7 34. Tantundem semper v. —39, 7 38. T.R.E. v. vii libras. Et post, vi libras. Modo, viii libras.—39, 7 44. T.R.E., et post, v. xx solidos. Modo, xxv solidos.—39,7 48. v. et v . semper xii solidos.—40, 7 2. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xx so¬ lidos. Modo xl solidos.—40, 7 7. T.R.E. ». x libras. Quando recepit vi libras. Modo, iiii libras. Tamen epi- scopus habnit viii libras.—40, 7 13. T.R.E. v. x libras. Episcopus misit ad firmam pro x libris. Quando Eul- bertus recepit vi libras. Modo simi¬ liter.—40, 719. T.R.E., et post, et modo, v. xl solidos. —40, 7 23. T.R.E. v . xl. . . xxx solidos. Modo c solidos.—40, 7 28. YAL T.R.E. v. iiii libras. Post, xx solidos. Modo, iiii libras. Hugo de Montfort tenet inde quod v. xx solidos.—40, 7 33. T.R.E., et post, v. xx solidos. Modo, xl solidos.—40, 7 38. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, 1 solidos. Modo, iiii libras, et servitium i mi¬ litis.—40, 7 43. Inter silvam et pasturam quod v. T.R.E. vi libras. Et post, et modo, tantun¬ dem.—40, 7 49. Quod v. et v. semper x solidos.—41,7 4. T.R.E. v. xl solidos, et post, xx solidos. Modo, xl solidos.—41, 7 5. T.R.E. v. viii libras. Et post, c soli¬ dos. Modo, vi libras.—41, 713. v. et v. semper xv solidos.—41, 7 16. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xl so¬ lidos.—Modo lx solidos.—41, 7 19. T.R.E. v. xxx solidos. Et post, xx so¬ lidos. Modo, xl solidos.—41, 7 23. T.R.E., et post, v. xl solidos. Modo, lx solidos.—41, 7 30. v. per annum iiii solidos.—41, 7 32. T.R.E. v. c solidos. Et post, nichil. Modo, vi libras.—41, 7 35. T.R.E. v. x libras. Et post, xxx libras. Modo, 1 libras. Tamen reddit de firma lxx libras.—41, 7 42. T.R.E. v. c solidos. Et post, 1 solidos. Modo, iiii libras.—41, 7 48. T.R.E., et post, v. xl solidos. Modo, 1 solidos.—42, 7 1. T.R.E., et post, v. xxx solidos. Modo, xl solidos.—42, 7 4. T.R.E., et post, v. xl solidos. Modo, 1 solidos.—42, 7 9. v. et o. semper x solidos.—42,711. v. hoc totum et v. xv solidos.—42, 7 16. T.R.E. v. viii libras. Quando recepit, c solidos. Modo, viii libras.—42, 7 21. Hoc utrunque v. xx solidos.—42, 7 25. T.R.E. v. xii libras. Et post, c soli¬ dos. Modo, x libras. Tamen reddit xii libras et xii solidos.—42, 7 29. T.R.E. v. viii libras. Quando recepit, vi libras. Modo, viii libras.—42,7 35. T.R.E. v. xv libras. Et post, et modo, xxx solidos.—42, 7 41. v. v solidos.—42, 7 46. T.R.E. v. viii libras. Et post, xx soli¬ dos. Modo, vi libras.—42, 7 52. Totum M. T.R.E. v. xii libras. Et post, xx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. Tamen quod Radulfus habet reddit iiii libras.—43, 7 1. T.R.E. v. x libras. Quando recepit, xxx solidos. Modo, xl solidos. Et tamen reddit iiii libras.—43, 7 9. T.R.E. v. c solidos. Et post, x solidos. Modo, xl solidos.—43, 7 13. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, lx. Modo, xl.—43, 717. v. et v. semper viii solidos.—43, 7 21. T.R.E. v. xii libras. Et post, xx soli¬ dos. Modo, ix libras.—43, 7 26. Quod v. x solidos.—43, 7 29. T.R.E. et post [«.] iiii libras. Modo, vii libras. Et tamen reddit viii li¬ bras.—43, 7 34. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xxx so¬ lidos. Modo, 1 solidos.—43, 7 38. T.R.E. o. c solidos. Et post, xxx so¬ lidos. Modo, lx solidos.—43, 7 42. T.R.E. v. c solidos. Et post, xx soli¬ dos. Modo, vi libras.—43, 7 45. T.R.E. v. xl solidos. Et post, x soli¬ dos. Modo, lx solidos.—43, 7 49. T.R.E. v. x libras. Et post, x solidos. Modo, xxx solidos.—43, 7 53. v. et v. semper lx solidos.—44, 7 4. Et v. per annum iiii solidos.—44, 7 7. T.R.E. v. 1 solidos. Et post, xx soli¬ dos. Modo, lx solidos.—44,710. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xxx so lidos. Modo, xl solidos.—44, 714. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xl soli¬ dos. Modo, lx solidos.—44, 7 20. T.R.E. v. iiii libras. Et post, xl soli¬ dos. Modo, c solidos.—44, 7 28. VAL T.R.E. v. xv solidos. Et post, x soli¬ dos. Modo, xx solidos.—44, 7 33. T.R.E. v. xxx solidos. Et post, xx so¬ lidos. Modo, xxx solidos.—44, 7 37. T.R.E. v. iii libras et x solidos. Et post, 1 solidos. Modo, vii libras.— 44, 7 43. T.R.E. v. xii solidos. Et post, vi so¬ lidos. Modo, xvi solidos.—44, 7 46. v. vi libras.—44, 7 50. T.lt.E., et post, et modo, v. iiii libras. —45, 7 4. T.R.E. v. iiii libras. Et post, xl soli¬ dos. Modo, c solidos.—45, 7 8. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xx soli¬ dos. Modo, lx solidos.—45, 7 13. Et tantum v. —45,7 19. Reddens xxx denarios. v. x solidos.— 45, 7 23. T.R.E. v. xl solidos. Et post, xxx so¬ lidos. Modo lx solidos.—45, 7 28. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xxx so¬ lidos. Modo, lx solidos.—45, 7 35. T.R.E. v. lxxx libras et e solidos et viii denarios. Quando recepit, exxv li¬ bras et x solidos de xx in ora. Modo, c libras ad numerum.—45, 7 43. T.R.E., et post, v. x libras. Modo, xii libras. Tamen reddit xiiii libras, et viii solidos, et iii denarios.—46, 7 8. T.R.E. v. xxviii libras. Et post, xvi libras. Modo, xxviii libras.—46, 7 14. Unum J. quod v. v solidos.—46, 715. T.R.E. v. c solidos. Et post, xl soli¬ dos. Modo, c solidos.—46, 7 20. T.R.E. v. xx libras. Et post, xviii li¬ bras. Modo, xxv libras et iiii soli¬ dos.—46, 7 28. T.R.E. v. xxv libras. Et post, xx li¬ bras. Modo, xxxii libras.—46,7 34. Tantum quod v. lx solidos.—46, 7 35. T.R.E. v. iiii libras. Et post, xl soli¬ dos. Modo, iiii libras.—46, 7 39. T.R.E. v. 1 solidos. Quando abbas re¬ cepit, xlv libras. Modo, 1 libras. Tamen reddit liiii libras.—46, 7 46. T.R.E. v. lxxx libras. Quando abbas recepit, xl libras. Modo, c libras.— 47, 7 3. Tantum quod v. ix libras quando pax est in terra.—47, 7 5. T.R.E. v. Iiii libras. Et post, xl libras. Modo, Ixxviii libras.—47, 7 11. Quod v. per annum xii libras.—47, 7 12. T.R.E., et post, v. c solidos. Modo, xi libras et ii solidos.—47, 7 19. Totum hoe, T.R.E., et post, et modo, v. iiii libras.—47, 7 28. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Quando recepit, xl solidos. Modo, iiii libras.—47, 7 33. T.R.E. [».] xl solidos. Et post, xx so¬ lidos. Modo, xl solidos.—47, 7 36. v. et semper v. xx solidos.—47, 7 38. T.R.E. v. xv libras. Quando recepit, viii libras. Modo, xiii libras ct v solidos.—47, 7 42. v. et- v. semper xv solidos.—47, 7 45. T.R.E., et post, v. iii libras. Modo, iiii libras.—47, 7 50. T.R.E., et post, v. xx solidos. Modo, xxx solidos.—48, 7 3. T.R.E. v. lxxx libras. Quando recepit, xx libras. Modo, lxxvi libras.—48, 7 9. v. iiii libras.—48,7 11 . v. vi libras.—48, 7 13. v. ix libras.—48, 7 16. v. iii libras.—48, 719. Quod v. viii solidos.—48, 7 20. Quod v. xxv Solidos.—48, 7 21. v. 1 denarios.—48, 7 23. v. vi libras.—48, 7 26. T.R.E. v. xxii libras. Et post, x li¬ bras. Pars abbatis, xxvi libras.— 48, 7 33. v. et v. x libras.—48, 7 36. T.R.E. v. viii libras. Quando recepit, xl solidos. Modo, vi libras. Tamen reddit viii libras.—48, 7 41. T.R.E., et post, et modo, v. xx solidos. Tamen appreciatin' xl solidis eo quod sit ad firmam.—48, 7 46. CONCORDANCE. YAL T.Ti.E. v. x libras. Quando recepit, vi libras. Modo v. xiiii libras quod ha- befc abbas. Quod Vitalis tenet, c so- lidos 49, l 2. T.R.E. v. xl solidos. Et post, x soli- dos. Modo, lx solidos.—49, Z 12. T.R.E. v. x solidos. Et post, v soli¬ dos. Modo, xx solidos.—49, Z 14. T.R.E. v. iiii libras. Et post, xx soli¬ dos. Modo, iiii libras.—49, Z 19. T.R.E. v. vi libras. Et post, iiii libras. Modo, viii libras.—49, Z 23. v. x libras. Et post, viii libras. Modo, xii libras et x solidos.—49, Z 32. T.R.E. v. xx libras. Et post, x libras. Modo, xxx libras.—49, Z 36. T.R.E. v. xvi libras. Et post, xii li¬ bras. Modo, xxx libras.—49, Z 46. T.R.E. v. lxx solidos. Et post, xxx solidos. Modo, lxx solidos.—50, Z 7. T.R.E., et post, et modo, v. xx solidos. —50, Z10. T.R.E. v. xxx solidos. Et post, xx so¬ lidos. Modo, xxx solidos.—50, Z 15. T.R.E. v. xxv solidos. Quando rece- pit, xx solidos. Modo, xxx solidos. —50, Z19. T.R.E. v. xx solidos.—Et post, xv so¬ lidos. Modo, xx solidos.—50, Z 23. T.R.E. v. lxx solidos. Et post lx so¬ lidos. Modo, c solidos.—50, Z 28. valu'd et v. xii solidos.—50, Z 33. v. et valu 'd x libras.—50, Z 40. T.R.E., et post, v. x libras. Modo, xv libras.—50, Z 46. T.R.E. v. xx solidos.—50, Z 48. T.R.E. v. iiii libras. Et post, iii libras. Modo, vi libras.—51, Z 4. T.R.E. v. iiii libras. Et post, iii li¬ bras. Modo, c solidos.—51, Z 7. T.R.E. v. xxx solidos. Et post, xv so¬ lidos. Modo, xxx solidos.—51, Z 10. r. et valu'd v solidos.—51, Z13. T.R.E. v. x libras. Et post, c solidos. Modo, xiiii libras.—51, Z19. Et v. xv solidos.—51, Z 21. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xx soli¬ dos. Modo, lx solidos.—51, Z 29. T.R.E., et post, v. viii libras. Modo, ix libras.—51, Z 33. v. et valuit lx solidos.—51, Z 36. T.R.E. v. ex solidos. Et post, et inodo, similiter.—51, Z 40. T.R.E. ». xii libras. Et post, vi libras. Modo, vii libras.—51, Z 48. v. et v. semper v solidos.—51, Z 50. T.R.E. v. viii libras. Et post, e soli¬ dos. Modo, vii libras.—52, Z 7. T.R.E. v. xl solidos. Et post, xx. Modo, lx solidos.—52, Z 13. v. et v. semper x solidos.—52, Z 18. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xxx so¬ lidos. Modo, c solidos.—52, Z 23. T.R.E. v. 1 solidos. Et post, xxx so¬ lidos. Modo, 1 solidos.—52, Z 2S. T.R.E. v. xl solidos. Et post, xx soli¬ dos. Modo, xxx solidos.—52, Z 33. T.R.E. v. x solidos. Et post, iiii soli¬ dos. Modo, viii libras.—52, Z 38. T.R.E., et modo, v. xl solidos.—52, Z 42. T.R.E., et modo, v. xxx solidos.—52, Z 45. v. et vadmit iiii solidos.—52, Z 47. Et v. ii solidos.—52, Z 50. T.R.E. v. xi libras. Et post, iiii libras. Modo, viii libras.—53, Z 6. T.R.E. v. xii libras. Et post, iii libras. Modo, xii libras.—53, Z11. YAL T.R.E. v . xl solidos. Et post, xv so¬ lidos. Modo, xxx solidos.—53, Z 21. T.R.E. v. xx libras. Et post, viii libras. Modo, xvi libras.—53, Z 29. v . iii solidos.—53, Z 31. v. semper, et v. c denarios.—53, Z 34. T.R.E. v. lx solidos. Et post, xx soli¬ dos. Modo, iiii libras.—53, Z 39. T.R.E. v . xxv solidos. Et post, xv so¬ lidos. Modo, xxx solidos.—53, Z 43. T.R.E. v . xx solidos. Et post, x soli¬ dos. Modo, xxv solidos.—53, Z 47. T.R.E. v. iiii libras. Et post, iii libras. Modo, c solidos.—54, Z 2. T.R.E. v. 1 solidos. Et post, xx soli¬ dos. Modo, iiii libras.—54, Z 7. T.R.E. v . lx solidos. Et post, xxx so¬ lidos. Modo, iiii libras et xv soli¬ dos.—54, Z12. v. et v. semper v solidos.—54, Z14. v. semper et v. x solidos.—54, Z 18. T.R.E. v. xx solidos. Et post, x soli¬ dos. Modo, xx solidos.—54, Z 22. T.R.E. i\ xxx denarios. Et post, xviii. Modo, iii solidos.—54, Z 25. T.R.E. v. xxx libras. Quando recepit, xxiiii libras. Modo, x libras.—54, Z 33. T.R.E. v . xx libras. Et post, xxx li¬ bras. Modo, xl libras.—54, Z 40. T.R.E., et post, o. xxx libras. Modo, xx libras eo quod terra vastata est a pecunia.—55, Z 8. T.R.E. v. iiii libras. Et post, c solidos. Modo, iiii libras.—55, Z 14. T.R.E. v. x libras. Et post, vii libras. Modo, xiii libras et vi solidos et vi denarios.—55, Z 23. v. lx solidos. — 55, Z 24. Totura v. iii libras.—55, Z 28. T.R.E., v . xii libras. Et post, x libras. Modo, xix libras.—55, Z 35. T.R.E. v. viii libras. Et post, et modo, v. vi libras.—55, Z 41. T.R.E. v. xl libras. Et post, xxxvi li¬ bras. Modo, xxxiv libras.—56, Z 21. v. xl solidos.—56, Z 22. Et v. x solidos.—56, Z 23. VASTATUS. Sunt t>. xi in fossato civitatis.—6, Z 5. Terra v. est a pecunia. — 55, Z 9. VENDITIO. Eo ignorante, facta est lirec v. —21, Z 36. YENIO. Q,uando missatici regis v. ibi.—2, Z 9. Quando Willelmus rex in Angliam v — 2, Z 19. Si non 3, Z 41. Si rex illuc v. —3, Z 50. VERTO. Post mortem ejus, v. se ad Alnod Gilt. — 22, Z 24. Brunesune tenuit et potuit cum terra sua v. se quo voluit.—23, Z 9. Aluret tenuit T.R.E., et potuit se v . quo voluit.—23, Z 15. Seuuart sot tenuit T.R.E. et potuit se v. cum terra sua quo voluit.—23, Z 20. Estan tenuit T.R.E., et potuit se v . quo voluit.—23, Z 27. Deriug tenuit et potuit se v . quo voluit. —23, Z 38. Godel de Brixi tenuit, et potuit se v. cum hac terra quo voluit.—24, Z 5. Cum terra sua v. quo voluerunt.—27, Z 4. Hoc M. reclamat Abbas, quia liabuit T.R.E.; sed filius hominis dicit pa- VES trem suum se posse v. ubi voluerit. —39, Z 15. YESTITUS. Et est de v. monachorum.—10, Z 6. Habent iiii libras ad v. suum.—15, Z 8. VIA. Strictior fiat publica v. regis.—3, Z 4. Stantem extra v. —3, Z 5. Infra has publicas 6, Z 38. In v. extra eivitatem.—6, Z 41. VICE. Una v. in anno.—2, Z 6. YICECOMES. Quando Haimo v. recepit.—6, Z12. Super luce habet v. ex solidos.—6, Z15. Quando Haimo v. recepit.—8, Z 9. Super htec reddit v. c solidos.—8, Z14. Osuuard tunc o. prmstitit ea.—8, Z 19. Hauc terram tenebat v. —S, Z 22. Osuuardus v. posuit extra M.—8, Z 27. Quando Haimo v. recepit.—8, Z 36. Et v. inde habet iii libras.—8, Z 37. Quando Haimo v. recepit.—9, Z 5. llaimoni v. dat pnepositus.—9, Z12. Tenet Haimo v. —13, Z 7. Haimo v. tenet.—15, l 23. Haimo v. tenet de episcopo.—25, Z 29. Haimo v. tenet de episcopo.—26, Z 42. Terra Hamonis v. —55, Z 15. Haimo v. tenet de rege.—55, Z17. VICECOMITATUS. Quando v. amittebat.—8, Z 23. VICTUS. Ad v. monachorum.—10, Z11. VIDUA. Ibi una v. manet reddens xxii denarios per annum.—42, Z11. VILLA. Treuva regis erat in v. —2, Z14. Manens in v. assiduus.—2, Z 16. Fuit ipsa v. combusta.—2, Z 20. In eadem v. —4, Z 21. Clerici de o.—10, Z 3. Tenet v. quse vocatur.—14, Z10. In hac v. tenet lladulfus.—14, Z 15. Tenet dim. J. in eadem v. —23, Z 26. In eadem v. habet i M. de episcopo.— 23, Z 45. VILLANUS (v. sub CAR.). Dim. denam tenet quam T.R.E. quidatn v. tenuit.—9, Z14. Duas partes cuidam v. per vim abstulit. —9, Z14. In D. nichil est. Sed iii v. et iiii B. ibi sunt.—26, Z 4. iii denas ubi maneut iiii v. —29, Z 1. v molini villanorum. —29, Z 33. Quos abstulit villa.im regis.—35, Z15. De hoc M. tenet Hugo filius Willelmi ix S. de terra villanorum. —36, Z 23. Ibi habet unum v. reddentem ii solidos. —37, Z 25. ii v. reddentes 1 denarios.—39, Z 9. llanc tenent iii v. modo ad firinam. Et reddunt xx solidos.—39, Z 37. Pro i J. Ibi est i v. reddens vi solidos. —40, Z 2. Ibi ii v. habent ii car., et reddunt vi solidos.—40, Z 22. Ibi unum J. leme et una virga. Et ibi sunt iii v. —41, Z15. Tenet dim. J. Ibi habet i v. et i B.— 42, Z45. Tenent ad firinam de Rege, i J. et v acras. Et ibi sunt ii v. cum ii B.— 43, Z 20. Tenet i J. Et ibi sunt iii v. —44, Z 45. Tenet i J. Et ibi est unus v. reddens xxx denarios.—45, Z 16. VIL Tenet xl acras. Et ibi est unus v. red¬ dens vi solidos.—45, Z 18. Tenet dim. J. Et ibi est unus v. red¬ dens xxx denarios. Valet x solidos. —45, Z 23. Tenent iii milites tantnm de terra v. quod valet ix libras.—47, Z 4. Ibi ii v. cum viii B.—47 ,1 50. De terra villanorum, liujus M. tenet i S. —48, Z10. De eadem terra villanorum tenet ii S. dim. J. minus, et ibi habet i car. Et ^ iiii v. cum i car.—48, Z12. ' Tenet de isto M., iii S., lx acras minus, de terra villanorum. —48, Z 14. Tenet de eadem terra v. i S.—48, Z 18. Tenet de eadem terra ». quod valet viii solidos.—48, Z 20. Tenet dim. S., et xi acras prati, de terra v.— 48, Z 21. Quidam v. tenuit.—49, Z 19. ... v. tenuerunt T.R.E.—49, Z 27. Medietatem liujus terre tenuerunt ii sochmanni. Et ii v. aliam.—50, Z 31. VINEA. Ibi ii arpendi v. —29, Z 32. Ibi iii arpendi ».—30, Z13. Ibi iii arpeimi v. —47, Z11. VIOLENTIA. Per v. Heraldi.—7, Z 45. VIRGA. Tenet iii v. —5, Z 21. Dim. J. et dim. v. —14, Z 21. Dim. S. et iii v. —38, Z 39. Unum J. terra:, et una v. —41, Z 15. Habet iii v. terra:.—49, Z 13. Dim. J. et dim. v. —50, Z 47. i S. dim. v. minus.—51, Z 6. Tenet iii v. et dim.—52, Z15. iii J. et dim. ».—52, Z 19. Tenet de Hugone i v. —53, Z 30. Dim. S. unam v. minus.—54, Z 9. Una v. terra:.—54, Z 23. VIS. Cuidam V. per v. abstulit.—9, Z 15. VIVO. Regis E. dum v. —8, Z IS. VOCOlt. i M. Ceiilentone v .— 4, Z18. Viliam qua: v. S cus M.—14, Z 10. Vluret ».—22, Z 9. Una terra v. Didele, et alia Soninges.— 22, Z41. Habet unum S. et v. Merlea.—30, Z M. quod v. Wi.—45, Z 37. Parvum burgurn quod v. Eoeewic.— 47, Z 14. Unum S., et v. Bevesfel.— 48, Z 25. VOLO (v. etiam LIBU1T). Potuit cum terra sua vertere se quo vo- luit. —23, Z 9. Potuit se vertere quo v. —23, Z13. Tenuit T.R.E. et potuit se vertere cum terra sua quo v. —23, Z 21. Potuit se vertere quo ».—23, Z 27. Potuit se vertere quo v. —23, Z 38. Potuit se vertere cum hac terra quo v. —24, Z 5. Cum terra sua vertere quo ».—27, Z 4. Potuit ire cum terra sua quo v .—31, Z 10. Se posse vertere ubi v. —39, Z17. Poluit ire quo v. cum terra.—40, Z 8. WALTO. Homines de w. —9, Z 3. WIT. Wluuardus w. —4, Z 4. INDEX OE NAMES AND TITLES ABB ABBAS S cI AUGUSTINI (v. etiam sub SANCTUS AUGUSTINUS). In Addelam, tenet a. S ci A. i S. Ante¬ cessor ejus tenuit in prebeuda simi¬ liter.—5, 7 24. a. S ci A. habet alios xiiii (burgenses in Cantuarin) pro excambio castelli.— 6, 7 6. a. S ci A. (annotatin' inter “Tenentes Terras in Client.”)—7, 7 50. yEeclesias et decimas hujus M. (Mid- deltune) tenet a. S ci A. —9, 7 10. Hoc M. (Briestede) tenuit Alnod a. de archiepiscopo.—15, 7 29. a. S cl A. tenet de episcopo Baiocensi Plumestede.—24, 7 28. De hoc M. (Esledes) liabet a. S ci A. dim. S.—29, 7 36. Hoe M. (Badlesmere) reelamat a. S ci A. quia liabuit T.R.E.—39, 7 15. Terra mcclesiie S ci A .— 46, 7 1. a. S ci A. habet inium M. nomine Plumstede.—46, 7 3. Ipse a. tenet Lertham. — 46,710. Ipse a. tenet Borne. — 46, 717. a. tenet M. Lanport.—46, 7 22. Ipse a. tenet Lttbbcrne. —46, 7 30. Ipse a. tenet Warwxntone.—46, 7 36. Modo tenet Radulfus de a.—46, 7 40. Ipse a. tenet Esturat.—46, 7 41. Quando a. recepit.—46, 7 46. Ipse a. tenet Tanet M.—46, 7 48. Quando a. recepit.—47, 7 3. Ipse a. tenet Cistelet. —47, 7 6. Ipse a. tenet Porewic. — 47, 713. iiii aerie teme quas tenent iiii moniales in elemosinn de a.—47, 7 27. Ipse a. tenet Wirentone. —47, 7 30. Ipse a. tenet Esmerfel et Ansehitil de eo.—47, 7 34. In Darenden tenet Adam de a. dim. S.—47, 7 37. Ipse a. tenet Setlinges M.—47, 7 39. Ipse a. tenet dim. J. in Kotinge. — 47, 7 43. Ipse a. tenet unum J. Rapentone, et Anseredus de eo.—47, 7 46. Qua; de suo D. dedit ei a.—47, 7 49. Tenet de a. Cherinchehelle. — 48, 71. Ipse a. tenet Norborne. —48,7 5. Nullum servitium red-lit abbuti nisi xxx solidos quos persolvit in anno.—48, 716. Ipse reddit abhatl xv solidos.—48, 7 22. Ipse a. tenet Mundingeiiam. — 48, 7 27. Pars abbalis xxvi libras.—48, 7 34. Nullum servitium reddit nisi xxx soli¬ dos per annum abbati. —48, 7 37. Ipse a. tenet Siberteswalt.—48,7 3S. Ipse a. tenet Peatenout. — 4S, 7 43. Ipse a. tenet Prestetune.—48, 7 48. Yalet xiiii libras quod habet a.—49,7 3. Tenet de a. Alvetone. — 49, 7 5. Tenet Bodesham de a.—49, 7 17. Ipse a. tenet in Lanport ii S. et unum Jugum.—49, 7 20. Ipse a. tenet Chenetone.—49, 7 25. Ipse a. tenet Burwar Mareso.—49, 7 33. De illo qui earn (Bedenesmere) tene- bat habebat a. sacmn et sociun.—49, 7 38. ABB Testatur lmndredns et homines a. S ci A. et Estrealest.—50, 7 36. ABBAS DE LA BATAILGE. a. de B. (annotatin' inter “Tenentes Terras in Ghent.”)—7, 7 55. a. S ci M. de loco belli tenet M. quod vocatur Wi.—45, 7 37. Si a. liabuisset sacas et socas.—45 7 45 ABBAS DE GAND. a. de G. (annotatur inter “Tenentes Terras in Client.”)—7, 7 50. a. de G. tenet de rege Lkvesham et de rege E. tenuit.—49, 7 40. ABEL. Quod a. tenet (dePERLAGA).—17,7 40. ACC l PIT RAH I US, WILLELMUS. W . a. tenuit de rege E. lxiii acras qua? pertinent in Hulviz.—55, 7 27. ADAM. a. tenet de episcopo Leleburne.—26, 7 27. De isto M. (Bogelei) habet unus homo a. unum S. et vocatur Merlea.— 30, 7 24. a. tenet de episcopo i J. in Pinpa.— 32,7 41. a. tenet de episcopo Celca.— 33, 7 49. Isdem a. tenet de episcopo Hecuaji.— 34, 7 8. Isdem a. tenet de episcopo in Colin ge i S. et dim.—34, 7 15. Isdem a. tenet de episcopo Biceelei. —34, 7 21. a. tenet de episcopo Ore.— 38, 710. a. tenet de episcopo Stanefelle.— 38, 7 35. a. tenet de episcopo i J. in Ore.—39, 7 36. a. tenet de episcopo Panne.— 40,7 20. a. tenet, de feudo episcopi, in Hamolde dim. J. lliculfus tenet de a .— 42, 7 23. In Darenden tenet a. de Abbate S ci A. dim. S.—47,7 37. Jacuit in Pane M. a. —54, 713. ADAM FILIUS HUBERTI (v. FI- L1U3 HUBEHTI). ADELELMUS. a. tenuit dim. J. et dim. virgam (in Est- brige?) de rege E. —50, 7 47. ADELOLDUS et ADELUUOLDUS). a. de Elteham, liabuit sacham et socam. —4, 7 2. In Addelam tenet a. iii vii'gas, Istemet tenuit T.R.E.—5, 7 21. a. Camerarius, et Hugo nepos Herbert! tenent de episcopo Fredenestede. —29, 7 26. a. tenet de episcopo Esledes.—29,7 30. a. tenuit IIerbretitov de episcopo.— 31, 7 26. a. tenuit Brunfelle de episcopo.—31, 7 31. a. tenuit de episcopo Testan.—33, 7 20 . Isdem a. tenuit de episcopo Benede- stede.—3S, 7 26. a. tenuit de episcopo Eswalt.—37, 7 20 . a. tenuit de episcopo Dene. liabuit dim. S. et dim. J. — 41, 7 1. ade/moldus (in Gollesberge) habet i J.—43, 7 28. ADE ADELULFUS. a. tenet dims partes i S. (in Wi).—45, 7 47. ADELUUOLDUS (v. etiam ADELOL¬ DUS). AGELRED. a. tenuit Eddintune de rege E. —27, 7 50. AILRICUS. a. tenuit Betmontesten de rege E.— 40, 7 50. AISIIIOLTE DE, EDID. e. de a. habuit sacham et socam.—4.7 7. ALAN. Dedit Episcopus Baiocensis a. clerico suo —5, 7 9. ALBERTUS CAPELLANUS. a. c. (annotatur inter “ Tenentes Terras in Client.”)—7, 7 55. a. c. tenet de rege Newetone. —56, 7 3. ALDRED (v. sub ALRET). ALDRET (v. sub ALRET). ALESTAN. Osuuard Vicecomes, T.R.E. pnestitit ea (terras in Tarentefort) a. prmpo- sito Lundonife.—8, 7 19. ALFER. Hoc M. (Olecumbe) tenuit a. de Archi¬ episcopo.—15, 7 35. ALI1AM DE, EDRICUS. e. de a. tenuit Ewelle de rege E.— 42, 7 30. e. de a. tenuit Ticheteste de rege E. — 44 7 29. ALNOD (v. etiam Alnod CILD). a. tenuit Ferlaga de rege.—32, 7 50. a. tenet de Hugone Hortone. Et i J. ibidem.—52, 7 8 et 714. ALNOD ABBAS. Hoc M. (Briestede) tenuit a. a. de Archiepiscopo Cantuariensi.—15, 7 29. ALNOD CILD (et CILT). a. c. Alodiarius et quietus de relevn- tione.—3, 7 20. De terris a. c. et similium ejus, habet rex custodiam.—3, 7 36. Excepta terra a. c. —6, 7 32. a. c. per violentiam Heraldi, abstulit S™ Martino Merclesham et Hauocliesten. —7, 7 45. Et a. c. duas partes cnidam Yillano (in Middeltune) abstulit.— 9,713. Post mortem regis E., Lestan (qui te¬ nuit Eddintone) vertit se ad a. e.— 22, 7 25. Aluuinus tenuit Craie de a. cilt. —25, 7 30. Vluric tenuit (Elentun) de a. c. —26, 7 41. Hoc M. (Aiglessa) tenuit a. c.—27, 713. Vluric tenuit Ofeham de a. c.—28,732. a. c. tenuit Certh. —30, 714. De isto S. (in Ferlaga) tenuit a. c. i J. in M. Pinpe de rege E.—33, 7 2. Godricus tenuit Benedestede de a. c. —33, 7 29. a. c. tenuit Boselev.— 33, 7 38. a. c. tenuit Eswalt de rege E. —37, 7 23. a. c. tenuit Bilsvitone.—41, 7 43. ALREBOT (v. sub ALRET). ALRED (v. sub ALRET). ALR ALRET (v. etiam ALDRED, ALDRET, ALRED). a. de Ellinges, habuit sacham et so- cam.—4,7 7. aired tenet i S. in S ea Margarita. T.R.E. pater hujus tenuit in pre- benda.—4, 7 40. a. tenuit Stellinges de rege E.— 35, 7 29. a. tenuit Essamelesford de rege E. —41, 7 20. aldred Bot, tenuit dim. S. (in Pos¬ tin' ges?) de rege E. sine halla.— 51, 7 22. alrebot tenuit Obtrepole de rege E.— 54, 7 3. aldrcl tenuit Hallinges de rege E.— 55, 7 2. a. tenuit Bermelinge de rege E.— 55, 7 10. ALRIC. a. tenuit i S. in S“ Margarita, in pre- benda T.R.E.—4, 7 39. ALSI. a. tenuit de Goduino Comite 1 burgenses in burgo de Romenel. —42, 7 1. a. tenuit Estbkige de Goduino Comite. 50, 7 42. ALTET. Ibi (in Leueberge) mansit quidam a. qui tenuit de rege E. ii acras in alo¬ dium, et tenuit eas de Ansirido.— 42.7 47. ALUIN (v. sub ALUUINUS). ALUREDUS. a. tenet (de Fulchestan) i S. et x acres.—36, 7 30. a. tenet de episcopo Midelea.—44, 717. ALUREDUS BIG A. a. b. tenuit Wicheham de rege E.— 35, 7 51. Sired tenuit dim. S. liberie terra?, (in Wicheham) de a. b. — 36,71. ALUREDUS DAPIFER. a. tenet (de Fulchestan) i S. et i J. et vi acras.—36, 7 36. ALURET. a. tenuit Pinnedene, T.R.E. et potuit se vertere quo voluit.—23,7 13. ALURIC. a. tenuit Tarent de rege E.— 23, 7 44. a. tenuit Riesce de rege E.—27, 7 25. a. tenuit Herbretitov de Goduino Co¬ mite.—31, 7 30. a. et Ordric duo fratres, tenuerunt Clive de rege E.—34, 7 37. ALUUARDUS. a. tenuit de Heraldo i S. in Hortune. —24, 714. a. tenuit de rege E. Rochelei. — 24, 7 38. Hanc terram (Cerletone) tenuerunt de rege ii fratres pro ii M., Goduin et a.—25, 7 47. a. tenuit hoc M. (Otringedene) de rege E.—30, 7 38. a., Ylnod, Wana, et Vlueron hanc ter¬ ram (Dene) tenuerunt de rege E.— 41.7 7. ALUUINUS et ALUIN. In Bocheland tenet alum i S. Idem, T.R.E. tenuit in prebeuda.—4, 7 26. 80 INDEX OF NAMES AND TITLES. ALU ANS ARC ARC a. tenuit Craie in.) xvi denarios.—7, 7 24. s : " s ii. habet x molendina et dim.—7, 7 25. Apud Scortebroc i pastura reddit (tt c0 in.) ii solidos.—7, 7 28. In communi terra s c0 m. sunt cccc acne et dim.—7, 7 31. De pastura Medrecltue et de liortis Douere exeunt (s™ in.) ix solidi et iiii denarii.—7, 7 33. (s cus in. habet) apud Ripam c acras, et apud Noruende 1 acras, et c acras apud Brand.—7, 7 34. Rannulfus de Columbels aufert eis unum pratum.—7, 7 40. Rotbertus de Romenel aufert eis, sin¬ gulis annis, xx denarios et i salinam et i piscariam.—7, 7 40. Herbertus lilius Ivonis dedit episco]io Baiocensi markam auri pro i molino eorura (canonicorum s' 1 ' in.), nolenti- bus illis. Lanbertus i molinum. Wa- dard i molinum. EadiUfus de Cur- bespine unum.—7, 7 42. Alnod, per violentiam Heraldi, abstulit s e0 in. Merclesuam et Hauoche- STAN. Canonici calumniantur terrain Et re¬ tone super llugonem de Mont fort. —50, 7 38. S m9 MARTINUS DE LOCO BELLI (v. BATAILGE). S cu9 PETRUS DE GAND (v. GAND). S“ SANSONE, RADULFUS DE. r. de s. tenet i M. Cerlentone in pre- benda.—4,717. SANCTA TRINITAS. Excepta terra d* t .—3, 718. Excepta terra s'" 7.—3, 7 32. Excepta terra tecclesiie .v™ t. —6, 7 32. Consuetudines in terra S'" 7.—6, 7 43. Antequam rex Edu ardos dedisset ilium (Sandwice) s'" 7.—10, 7 8. SBERN. s. tenuit Dictune de rege E.—26, 7 46. SBERN BIGA. xi masuras (in Cantuaria) qua; fue- runt s. b. —6, 7 30. s. b. tenuit de rege E. Chestan.—26, 716. s. b. tenuit Berlinge de rege E.—28, 7 39. s. b. tenuit Turneham de rege E.—31, 7 43- Tenuit Fereburne de rege E. —31,7 47. s. b. tenuit Piventone de rege E. — 41, 7 12. Hoc M. (Warwintone) tenuit Edricus de s. b. —46, 7 40. s. b. tenuit Postinges.—51, 7 14. SEUUARDUS. s. tenuit Bocheland de rege E. —39, 7 27. SEUUART SOT. s. s. tenuit (Lolingeston) T.R.E. et potuit se vertere cum terra sua quo voluit.—23, 7 20. SEUUEN. s. canonicus S oi M.—7, 7 3. SEUUOLD. s. tenuit Macheiievet T.R.E. —39,7 10 . SIDGAR (v. SIGAR). SIGAR. T.R.E. tenuit s. in prebenda i S. in S ca Margarita.—4, 7 48. s. tenet i J. et dim. in Sibertesuualt. Pater ipsius, T.R.E. tenuit in pre¬ benda.—5, 7 30. SIG sidgar tenuit Newetone de regina Eddid.—56, 7 4. signr reddebat apud Mildetone ave- ram.—56, 7 IS. SIRED et SIRET. T.R.E. 8. tenuit i S. in Cerlenton e, et i monasterium in Douere.—4,7 24. 8. liabet i S. in S“ Margarita. T.R.E. pater ejus tenuit in prebenda.—4, 7 34. T.R.E. tenuit s. in Ferlingelai i S. in prebenda.—5, 7 38. 8. canonicus S ci M.—7, 7 3. Dim. S. libera; tcrne (in Wiciieiiam) quam s. tenuit de Aluredo Biga.— 36, 7 1. s. tenuit Cileham de rege E.—38, 7 33. 8. tenuit Eslinges de rege E.— 40, 7 14. 8. tenuit Dodeham de rege E.— 40, 7 20 . Lefstan, et Leuuin, et Eluret et .s., et alii ii tenuerunt Pesinges et Pi iia.m T.R.E., et poternnt ire quolibet cum terris sms.—41, 7 36. s. tenuit xv acras in Esmetone de rege E.—44, 7 38. SIRET DE C1LLEHAM. s. de c. alodiarius et quietus de releva- tione.—3, 7 21. Excepta terra s. de c. — 6 , 7 33. SIUUARD. 8. tenuit Redlege de rege E.—22, 7 35. SPIRITES. T.R.E. tenuit s. i J. et dim. apud S cnm Margaritam in prebenda.—5, 7 35. STIGANDUS, ARCI11EP1SCOPUS. s. a. tenuit i S. in Addelam. — 5,7 12. Hoc M. (Berham) tenuit s. a. sed non crat de archiepiscopatii ; sed fuit de dominica finna regis E.—37, 7 50. SUDTONE, LEUENOT DE. 7. de 8. habuit sacliam et socam.—4, 7 5. TAIIUM, F1LIUS WILLELMI. /. m. t. teuet de episcopo Deuce.—32, 7 10. T1NEL, TURSTINUS. I. 1. et uxor ejus tenent ad firmam de rege W. in Leueberge i J. et v acras.—43, 719. TOC HI. 7. tenuit de rege E. Ciresfel. — 24,7 44. t. tenuit i J. in Wanesberge de rege E.—44, 7 31. TOLL 7. tenuit de rege E. Sudcrai. — 24, 7 49. 7. ct Goduuin lilius Carli, lianc terrain (Hecham) tenuerunt pro ii M.—34, 714. TONEBEIGE DE, RICARDUS II. de T. (annotatur inter) “ Tcnentes Terras in Client.”—7, 7 53. [Otefort] R. de T. quod in sua leuga tenet.—10, 7 32. [Norfluet] R. de T. quod tenet in sua leuga.—11,718. [Broteiiam] R. de T. quod tenet in sua leuga.—11, 7 33. [Forningeham] 11. de T. de eadem silva tantundein habet in sua leuua. —15, 7 5. [Elesford] tenet R. de T. tantum silva; unde exire possunt xx porch—15, 7 14. [Peciieiiam] de eadem M. tenet R. de T. ii S. et unum J.—17, 715. [Mepeham] R. de T. habet in sua leuga quod valet xviii solidos et vi denarios. Silvam xx porcorum.— 17, 7 29. [Ferlaga] quod R. tenet in sua leuga (valet) iiii libras.—17, 7 40. De isto Manerio (Sudfleta) est in T. tantum de silva et de terra quod ap¬ preciate xx solidis.—20, 7 8 . [Estanes] R. de T. teuet de isto M. tantum silva; quod valet xv solidos. —20, 715. TON [IIai.t.inges] Quod Ricardua tenet in sua leuua valet vii solidos.—21,713. [Frandesberie] quod R. tenet in sua leuua valet x solidos.—21, 7 19. [Svinescamp] de silva hujus M. tenet Ricardua in sua leuua quod valet iiii solidos.—22, 7 15. [Redlege] una dena silva; quam tenet R. de I— 22,7 33. [Eisse] quod R. tenet de T. xl solidis appreciate.—22, 7 43. [Lasela] R. de T. quod tenet in leuua sua appreciate vi libris.—25, 7 9. [Leleburne] R. de T. tenet in sua leuua quod valet xxiiii solidos—26, 7 32. [Aiglessa] Ricardus quod tenet in sua leuua, xv denarios.—27, 710. [Meletune] R. quod tenet in sua leuua, v solidos in una silva.—28, 7 6. [Ledesdune] R. quod habet in sua leuua xx denarios.—28, 7 12. [Ofeham] R. de T. quod tenet xi soli¬ dos valet.—28. 7 31. R. de T. tenet de episcopo Haslov.— 29, 7 2. R, de T. de episcopo Tivedele.—29, 710 . De hoc M. [Hov] tenet R. de T. i S. et silvam xx porcorum.—32, 7 32. [Litelbroteham] R.de T. habet in sua leuua quod valet xiii solidos.—33,746. [Colin ge] R. de T. quod habet in sua leuua valet vii solidos.—34, 7 19. R. de T. tenet Hallinges.—55, 7 2. Isdem Ricardua tenet Berjielinge.— 55,710. TURBATUS. t. tenet dim. S. in S ca Margarita. — 5,71. TURGIS. 7. alodiarius et quietus de relevatione.— 3, 7 21. Hoc M. (Leleburne) tenuit 7. de Go- duino Coraite.—26, 7 35. 7. tenuit Bogelei de rege E.—30, 7 27. 7. tenuit Langvelei de rege E. —30, 7. tenuit Ore de rege E.—38, 714. 7. tenuit Stanefelle de Goduino Co- mite.—38, 7 18. 7. tenuit Estefort de Goduino Co¬ mite.—50, 7 16. 7. tenuit Belice de rege E. —51, 7 26. TURGOD et TURGOT. 7. tenuit Nordeslinge T.R.E.—39, 7 49. turgot tenuit i J. in Bocheland de rege E.—40, 7 3. TURSTINUS. 7. tenet in Ospringes i J. —38, 7 42. 7. tenet de episcopo Chenoltone. — 43, 7 33. 7. tenet de episcopo Ticheteste.—44, 7 26. Isdem 7. tenet de episcopo i Jugum in Wanesberge.—44, 7 30. Isdem 7. tenet de episcopo i Jugum in Ece.—44, 7 32. TURSTINUS, GLRUNDE DE. 7. de g. tenet in Bochelande i J. de episcopo.—40,71. TURSTINUS TINEL. 7. 7. et uxor ejus tenent ad firmam de rege W. in Leueberge i J. et v acras.—43, 7 19. ULRIC (v. etiam VLURIC etVLURET). it. tenet i J. in Gocistone.—4, 7 30. vine de Oxenford habet viii acras in Cornelai hundredo. —5,710. VALBADON, RANNULFUS DE. r. de v. tenet dim. J. in IIamestede quod tenuerunt ii liberi homines de rege E. in Bocheland.—45, 7 20. r. de v. tenet i J. (de Nouborne).— 48, 7 24. VITAL1S. De hoc M. (Nortone) tenet t>. iii S. et iJ. ctxii acras.—12, 7 28. v. tenet de episcopo Sifletone.—26, 7 48. v. de episcopo tenet Soaneclive.—38, 7 1. INDEX OF NAMES AND TITLES. YIT o. tenet de episcopo i J. in eodem bun. dredo (Witenestaplf,). —38, 7 6. v. de hoc M. (Prestetcne) tenet i S. et dim. J.—49, 7 1. Quod v. tenet c solidos valet.—49, 7 4. VLESTAN (DE OTRINBERGE?). v. de o. habuit sacliam et socam.—4, l 6. VLNOD. o. tenuit Totiktune de rege E.—27, 7 41. v. tenuit Trevelai de rege E.—39, 7 45. Iianc terrain (Dene) tcnuenint v., et Wana, et Aluuard et Vlueron de rege E.—41, 7 7. v. tenuit Brociiestelle de rege E.— 43,718. v. tenuit Hastingelai de rege E.— 45, 7 30. v. tenuit Tintentone de rege E.— 51, 7 42. v. tenuit Estraites de rege E.—52, 7 35. v. tenuit dim. S. in Hastingelie de rege E.—54, 7 16. VLRIC (v. ULltlC). VLSI. v. tenuit i J. in eodem liundredo (Wite- n estaple) de rege E.— 38, 7 8. v. presbyter tenuit IIaintone de rege E.—50, 7 8. VLSTAN et VLTAN. »., fllins Yluuin, tenet i S. in Siber- TESUUALT.—5, 7 44. vllan tenuit Maplescamp sub lleraldo. —23, 7 32. v. tenuit Notestede de rege E.—28, 7 24. VLUERON. Iianc terrain (Dene) tenuerunt Vlnod, et Wana, et Aluuard et v. de rege E. —41, 7 7. VLU VLUEUA. v. tenuit Perie de rege E.—39, 7 24. VLUIET. v. tenuit Wincheeesmere de rege E. et potuit ire quo libuit.—31, 7 16. v. tenuit Estselve de rege E.—31, 7 20 . v. tenuit Rongostone de regeE.—40, 7 23. VLURET. In hoc M. (Hagelei) tenet v. xx acrns, nee pertinet ad iUud M., neque potuit habere doiniuum nisi regem. —22, 7 8 . VLURIC (v. etiam ULRIC). v. tenuit Elentun de Alnod Cilt.— 26, 7 41. v. tenuit (Ofeiiam) de Alnod Cilt.— 28, 7 32. v. tenuit Popessale de rege E.— 37, 7 34. VLUUARDUS. v. tenuit Melestcn de rege E.— 34, 7 50. VLTJUIC. v. tenuit Sei.inges de rege E.—45,79. VLUUILE WILDE. v. tenuit Etretone in alodio T.R.E. —50, 7 38. VLUUINUS. v. T.R.E. tenuit i S. in Sibertesuuald. —5, 7 46. v. et Leuuinus tenuerunt Sifletone in paragio, et potuerunt cum terra sua se vertere quo voluerant.—27, 7 5. Leurie, et v. et Goduinus tenuerunt Gravesham (tunc iii M.).—2S, l 19. v. tenuit Colinge de Leuuino comite. —34, l 20. v. tenuit Bichelei de Leuuino Comite. 34, l 23. VLU v. tenuit Poltone de rege E. —53, l 19. VNLOT. v. tenuit de rege E. Eslinges. Et po¬ tuit ire quo voluit cum terra.—40, l 8. WADARDUS. w. liabet vi (domos in Dotiere). —2, l 32. to. (abstulit) i molendinum (de canonicis S ci M.).—7, l 43. De silva regis (in Middeltune) babet w. tantum, etc.—9, l 13. to. tenet de episcopo dim. S. in Eer- ningeham.—23, l 22. Excepto isto dim. S. tenet to. dim. J. in eadem villa quod nunquam se quietavit apud regem. —23, l 25. Isdem w. tenet de episcopo Maples¬ camp.—23, l 29. to. tenet de episcopo Notestede.—28, l 21. to. tenet de episcopo Beuchvelle.— 40, l 35. to. tenet de episcopo Cvmbe. —40, 1 40. to . tenet de isto M. (Norborne) iii S., lx acras minus, de terra Villanorum. —48, l 14. to. tenet ibi (Mundingeiiam) terram quas T.R.E. semper geldavit.—48, l 29. to. babet in D. (Mondingeham) i car., etc.—48, l 35. WALTERUS. Tenet to. (in S ca Margarita) i S. —4, 7 46. to. de Douuai tenet de episcopo Lee. — 25, 7 39. WANA. Hanc terram (Dene) tenuerunt Vlnod, et v:., et Aluuard, et Vlueron de rege E.—41,7 7. WER WERELIN. to. tenuit Berchvelle de rege E.—40, 7 39. WESMAN. to. tenet (de Eulcilestan) i S.—36,7 34. WIBERTUS. to. tenet dim. J. quod jacuit in gildam de Doveue.—44, 7 5. WILDE, VLUUILE. v. to. tenuit Etretone T.R.E. in alodio. —50, 7 39. WILLELMUS. to. (Folet) tenet de arcbiepiscopo Tils- MANESTONE.—16, 7 39. to. bomo arcbiepiscopi de terra bujus M. (Gecliain) tenet tantum, etc.—18,7 8 . De terra hnjus M. (Litelcert) tenet to. de arcbiepiscopo dim. S.—18, 7 47. Quod to. tenet, appreciatur xl solidis 18, 7 50. to. tenet, de Ilugone iii J. et dim. vir- gam in Orlavestone.—52, 719. to. accipitrarim tenuit lxiii acras in Holviz de rege E.—55, 7 27. WILLELMUS PICTAVENSIS. to. p. tenet dim. S. et xii acras in Si- b e ut e s OB alt ; et in Addelam dim. S. xii acras minus.—5, 718. WILLELMUS REX (v. REX WIL¬ LELMUS). WIRELMUS. to. tenuit Essetesford de rege E.— 50, 7 24. WIT, WLUUARDUS. to. to. babuit saebam et socam.—4,7 4. WLUI. to. tenuit Perie de rege E. — 39, 1 18. WLUUARDUS. to. tenuit ii S. in Walwalesere de rege E.—44, 7 44. to. Wit habuit saebam et socam.—4,7 4. [JVo Manuscript for the Introduction to this section of the Work has been found among the Author's papers, and probably none mas ever prepared,^ KENT. ya yjOUERE, in the time of King Edward, rendered eighteen pounds, of which moneys King Edward had two parts, and Earl Godwin the third. On the contrary, the Canons of St. Martin had another moiety. ihe Burgesses gave the King twenty ships, once a year, for fifteen days, and in each ship were twenty-one men. This they did, in return for his having endowed them with Saca and Soca. When the King’s Messengers came there, they gave for the passage of a horse threepence in winter, and two¬ pence in summer. But the Burgesses found the Pilot, and one other to assist him. And if he wanted more, it was hired at his own cost. h rom the festival of St. Michael to the feast of St. Andrew, the King’s truce (i. e. peace) was in the town. If any one broke it, thereupon the King’s Reve received a common emend. Whoever resided constantly in the town and rendered custom to the King, was quit of Thol throughout all England. All these customs were there when King William came into En°-land. On his very first arrival in England the said town was burnt, and therefore no computation could be made of what it was really worth at the time when the Bishop of Baieux received it. Now, it is appraised at forty pounds, yet the Reve renders fifty-four pounds from it. To the King, twenty-four pounds, in pence of twenty to the ore; but to the Earl, thirty pounds, by tale. In Douere there are twenty-nine messuages, of which the King has lost the custom. Of these, Robert de Romenel has two;— Ralph de Curbespine, three;— William, Son of Tedald, one;— William, Son of Oger, one;— William, Son of Tedold, and Robert Niger, six;— William, Son of Goisfrid, three, in which was the Gihalla of the Burgesses;— Hugh de Montfort, one house;— Durand, one;— Rannulpii de Columbels, one;— Wadard, six; —The Son of Modbert, one. And these all in respect of these houses avouch the Bishop of Baieux as their protector and liveror, ( and donor.) Of that messuage which Rannulpii de Columbels holds, which belonged to a certain exile (i. e. an outlaw), they agree that half the land is the King’s, and Rannulpii himself has both. Humphrey ( the Bandylegged) holds one messuage, of which half the forfeiture was the King’s;— Roger de Ostreiiam built a certain house over the King’s water, and has to this day kept to himself the King’s custom, nor was there a house there in the time of King Edward. In the entrance of the Port of Douere, there is one mill which shatters almost every ship, by the great swell of the sea, and does very great damage to the King and his Men; and it was not there in the time of King Edward. Concerning this, the Nephew of Herbert says, that the Bishop of Baieux granted leave for its erection to his Uncle, Herbert, Son of Iuo. The Men of four Laths, that is, Boruuar Lath, and Estre Lath, and Linuuart Hath, and Wiuuart Lath, agree that these underwritten, are the King’s Laws. If any one shall make a hedge or ditch, by which the King’s Highway is narrowed; or shall throw, withinside of the way, a tree standing on the outside, and shall carry away bough or twig thereof; for each of these forfeitures he shall pay to the King an hundred shillings; and if he shall have gone home, not apprehended, or bailed, yet the King’s officer shall follow him, and he shall emend in an hundred shillings. Concerning Gribrige: If any one shall commit it, and be challenged in the way, or bailed, he shall emend to the King in eight pounds; but if otherwise, he shall be quit as to the King; not as to the Lord whose Man he may be. Concerning other forfeitures: The same as for Gribrige; but he shall emend by an hundred shillings. These forfeitures the King has over all the allodiaries in the entire county of Kent, and over their Men. And when an allodiary dies, the King thereupon has relief of his land, except the land of St. Trinity, and St. Augustine, and St. Martin : And except these; Godric de Burnes, and Godric Carlesone, and Aldnold Cilt, and Esber Biga, and Siret de Cilleilam, and Turgis, and Norman, and Azor. Over these, the King has forfeiture from their persons only. And from the lands of those who have their own Saca and Soca, he has relief. And from these lands, namely, Goslaches, and Bociieland, and another Bocheland, and a third Bociie- land, and Herste, one yoke of Ore, and one yoke of Herte, Sciiildricheiiam, Maciieiieue, Ernulfitone, OSLACIHNTONE, Piria, and another Piria, Brulege, Osprdtges, Hortone, the King has these forfeitures, Handsoc, Gribrige, Foristel. Concerning adultery: Throughout the whole of Kent, the King has the man, and the Archbishop the woman; except the land of St. Trinity, and St. Augustine, and St. Martin, from which the King has nothing. From the robber who has been condemned to death, the King has the moiety of his money. And he who shall harbour an exile without the King’s license, the King has forfeiture for it. 2 A 94 KENT. 3 - 3(5 From the lands above named, of Alnod (Gild) and his peers, the King has guard for six days at Canterbury or at Sanuuic, and there they have from the King meat and drink. If they shall not have it, they go away without incurring forfeiture. 3-39 If they shall have premonition to meet at a Shire Mote, they shall go as far as PiNNEDENN, not further. And, if they shall not come; for this forfeiture, and for all others, the King shall have an hundred shillings; except Gribrige, which is emended by eight pounds. 3—43 And concerning the highways, as is above written. 3- 44 In Linuuart Lath, in Briseuuei, the King has custom, namely, two crates and two sticks of eels, in lieu of one Inward; and in the land of Sopihs he has twelve pence in lieu of one Inward; and from one yoke of North- burgii twelve pence, or one Inward; and from Dene eighteen pence; and from Gare one Inward. These lands lie in Wi; and the Men of these lands used to guard the King at CANTERBURY and at SANUUIC, for three days, if the King came there. -l-i In the Lath of Sudtone, and in the Lath of Ailesford, these had Saca and Soca. Brixi Cilt, Adelold de Elteiiam, Anschil de Becheham, Azor de Lesneis, Aluuin ( Ilor ), Wlward Wit, Ordinc de Hortone, Esbern de OlLLESFELLE, LEUENOT DE SUDTONE, EDWARD DE ESTAN, VlESTAN and LeURIC DE OTRINBERGE, OSWARD DE NORDTONE, Edid de Aisiiiolte, Alret de Ellinges. THE LAND OF THE CANONS OF ST. MARTIN OF DOVRE. 4 - o In the Lath of Estrede, the Canons of St. Martin, in the time of King Edward, had twenty-one sulings in the hundred of Cornely and in the hundred of Beusberge. 4 -h In the Lath of Linuuarlet they had three sulings, one in ESTRET hundred, another in BELISSOLT hundred, and the third in Blaciieborn hundred. 4 -H In the time of King Edward the prebends were in common, and rendered sixty-one pounds in all. Now, they have been severally apportioned by the Bishop of Baieux. IN BEVSBERG HUNDRED. 4 -if> Ralph de St. Sansone holds one Manor as a prebend, it is called CERLENTONE, and answers for one suling. He has there three villans, and four bordars, with one team. In all, it is worth seventy shillings. In the time of King Edward, an hundred shillings. Leuuin held it as a prebend. 4-21 In the same ville, William Son of Oger holds one suling. And has there one villan, and seven bordars, with half a team. And one mill of forty shillings. A certain Frenchman has one team there. 4-23 The same William holds, of the Bishop, one Monastery in Douere, and renders him eleven shillings. The Canons claim it. All this is worth six pounds. In the time of King Edward, twelve pounds. Sired held it. 4-26 In Bociielande, Alujn holds one suling. And has there six villans, and ten bordars, with one team and a half. Altogether it is worth four pounds. In the time of King Edward, an hundred shillings. The very same held it as a prebend. 4-29 In GOCISTONE, Ulric holds one yoke. And has there two villans, and one bordar, with one team. To this land there pertain twenty-five acres of land in Corneli hundred. And there there are five bordars, with half a team. In all, it is worth twenty shillings. In the time of King Edward, ten shillings. Elric held it as a prebend. 4-33 IN THIS SAME HUNDRED LIES ST. MARGARET. There Sired has one suling. And one team in demesne. And six bordars. With four slaves. It is worth an hundred shillings. In the time of King Edward, four pounds. The father of the same Sired held it as a prebend. 4-37 In the same place, Ralph holds one suling. And has one team in demesne. And seven bordars. It is worth sixty-nine shillings and two pence. In the time of King Edward, four pounds. Alric held it similarly as a prebend. 4-40 In the same place, Alred holds one suling. And has, in demesne, one team. And two villans, and two bordars, with half a team. It is worth sixty shillings. In the time of King Edward, twenty shillings. His father held it as a prebend. 4-43 In the same place, Robert Niger has one suling. And has there three villans, and six bordars, with one team. KENT. 95 It is worth thirty shillings. In the time of King Edward, twenty shillings. Esmellt, chaplain to King Edward, held it. In the same place, Walter holds one suling. And has there three villans, and five bordars, with one team and a half. It is worth sixty shillings. In the time of King Edward, seventy shillings. Sigar held it as a prebend. In the same place, Turbat holds half a suling. And has there two villans, and one bordar, with half a team. And the same Robert has half a suling in CORNELAI Hundred. And half a team there in demesne. And five bordars. Altogether, it is worth three pounds. In the time of King Edward, four pounds. Goldstan held it. In the same place, Eduuine holds half a suling, and twenty-five acres of land besides. In demesne he has half a team. And one villan with half a team. IN CORNELAI HUNDRED. The same Eduuine has fourscore and five acres. And one villan there with one team. It is worth three pounds. In the time of King Edward, four pounds. He himself held it in the time of King Edward. From this prebend the Bishop of Baieux took eight acres, and gave them to his clerk Alan. Now, Vlric de Oxenford has them. IN CORNELAI HUNDRED. In Addelam, Anschitil (the Archdeacon) holds one suling. And has there in demesne two teams. With six bordars. Stigand the Archbishop held this land. To this same Ansciiitil the Bishop of Baieux gave fifty acres of land at Deal, and other fifty acres at St. Margaret’s, where he has one villan, and half a team. These hundred acres were part of the prebends, as they testify. Altogether, it is worth eight pounds. In the time of King Edward, seven pounds. IN BEVSBERG HUNDRED. In SlBERTESUUALT, William of Poitiers holds half a suling and twelve acres. And in Addelam half a suling, less twelve acres. And he has there two villans, and three bordars, with one team and a half. All this is worth fifty-five shillings. In the time of King Edward, four pounds. IN CORNELAI HUNDRED. In Addelam, Adelold holds three virges. And has there three villans, and eight bordars, with one team. It is worth, and always was worth, sixty shillings. The same held it in the time of King Edward. IN BEVSBERG HUNDRED, AND IN CORNELAI HUNDRED. In Addelam, the Abbot of St. Augustin holds one suling. And has there three villans, and seven bordars, with one team and a half. It is worth thirty shillings. In the time of King Edward, forty shillings. His predecessor held it, in like manner, as a prebend. In Addelam, William, Son of Tedald, holds half a suling and half a yoke. And has there in demesne one team. And two villans, and two bordars. It is worth sixty shillings. In the time of King Edward, forty shillings. Derinc (son of Sired) held it. In SlBERTESUUALT, Sigar holds one yoke and a half. And has there in demesne half a team. And two villans and one bordar. It is worth twenty-five shillings. In the time of King Edward, thirty-five shillings. The father of the same held it as a prebend. Nigell the physician holds one yoke and a half at St. Margaret’s. And has there one villan, with two oxen. It is worth twenty shillings. In the time of King Edward, twenty-five shillings. Spirites held it as a prebend. IN BEVSBERG HUNDRED. In Ferlingelai, William, Son of Geffrey, holds one suling. And has there in demesne one team. And four villans, with one team. It is worth four pounds. In the time of King Edward, six pounds. Sired held it as a prebend. In Hicham, Baldwin holds one suling. And has there four villans, and five bordars, with two teams. It is worth four pounds. In the time of King Edward, one hundred shillings. Eduin held it. KENT. 96 In Bociielaxd, Godrio holds one suling. And has there two teams in demesne. And three villans, and four bordars, with one team. And one Church. It is worth six pounds. In the time of King Edward, eight pounds. In Sibertesuuald, Vlstan, Son of Vluuin, holds one suling. And has there half a team. And three villans, and nine bordars, with one team. In the time of King Edward, it was worth an hundred shillings. Now, sixty shillings. His father held it. IN THE CITY OF CANTERBURY King Edward had fifty-one burgesses rendering gafol. And two hundred and twelve others over whom he had Saca and Soca. And three mills of forty shillings. Now, the Burgesses rendering gafol are nineteen. Of the other thirty-two which there were, eleven have been destroyed in making the city ditch, and the Archbishop has seven of them, and the Abbot of St. Augustin has the other fourteen, for the exchange of the Castle. And still there are two hundred and twelve Burgesses over whom the King has Saca and Soca. And three mills rendering an hundred and eight shillings. And Thol rendering sixty-eight shillings. There eight acres of meadow, which used to belong to the King’s legates, now render fifteen shillings of rent. And one thousand acres of unproductive wood, the proceeds of which are twenty-four shillings. Altogether, in the time of King Edward, it was worth fifty-one pounds. And as much when the sheriff (Ilaimo) received it. And now, it is appraised at fifty pounds. Yet the present tenant renders thirty pounds assayed by fire and weighed, and twenty-four pounds by tale. Besides all these, the Sheriff has an hundred and ten shillings. A certain monk of the Church of Canterbury has taken away two houses of two of the Burgesses, one without the City, and the other within. These were situated in the King’s highway. The Burgesses had forty-five messuages without the city, of which they themselves had the gafol and custom; but the King had the Saca and Soca. The same Burgesses also had of the King thirty-three acres of land for their guild. These houses and this land Rannulpii de Columbels holds. Besides these, he has fourscore acres of land which the Burgesses held of the King in Alodia. He also holds five acres of land which in just right belong to a church. Of all these the same Rannulf avouches the Bishop of Baieux as protector. Ralph de Curbespine has four messuages in the city, which a certain concubine of Harold held, the Saca and Soca of which belong to the King, but up to this time he has not had it. The same Ralph holds of the Bishop (of Baieux), in the same city, eleven other messuages, which belonged to Sbern Biga, and render eleven shillings and two pence and one halfpenny. Throughout the whole City of Canterbury the King has Saca and Soca, except the land of the Churches St. Trinity and St. Augustine, and Queen Eddeua, and Alnod Cild, and Esber Biga, and Siret de Cilleham. It is agreed concerning the direct roads which have entrance and exit through the city. Whoever commits forfeiture in them shall emend to the King. In like manner, with regard to the direct roads without the city, as far as one leuga and three perches and three feet. If, therefore, any one dig or fix a stake in these public ways, within the city or without, the King’s Reve follows him wherever he may have gone, and shall receive emend to the King’s use. The Archbishop claims forfeiture in the ways without the city, on each side, where his land is. A certain Reve named Brumann, in the time of King Edward, took customs of foreign merchants in the land of St. Trinity and St. Augustine ; who afterwards, in the time of King William, acknowledged before Archbishop Lanfranc and the Bishop of Baieux, that he had unjustly taken it; and being put upon his oath, swore that the said churches had their customs undisturbed in the time of King Edward. And thenceforward both churches have had their customs in their own lands, by judgment of the King’s Barons who held the plea. The City of Rochester, in the time of King Edward, was worth an hundred shillings. When the Bishop received it, likewise. Now, it is worth twenty pounds, yet the tenant renders forty pounds. ITEM. THE POSSESSION OF ST. MARTIN. Of the community of St. Martin, three canons together hold one suling and sixteen acres, that is, Sired, Godric, and Sewen. In this land there are four villans, and nine bordars, with one team. They render twenty-two shillings. Of the Lath of Limwarlet, one suling in Blacheburne Hundred. And there are there nine villans, with two teams. They render sixteen shillings and eight pence. KENT. In Stbet Hundred there lies one soling of Stahetdeste. There, seven villans have two teams and a half. And seven bordars. And one meadow. They render sixteen shillings and eight pence. In Bilesold Hundred, one suling of Stanestede. There are there seven villans, and seven bordars. And they have four teams. And render twenty shillings, less two pence. In addition to those three sulings, there are five denns. And six villans, and five bordars. And they render nine shillings, less three pence. They have three teams and a half. In Bhensete, but little arable land. There are two villans, and three bordars. And they have half a team. They render fifty pence. The Canons of St. Martin have these four sulings aforesaid, wood and open together, in common. In the time of King Edward it was worth ten pounds. Now, likewise. The land of NORDEUUODE, and the land of RlPA, and the land of Brandet render twenty shillings and six pence to St. Martin, in alms. In the Inland of St. Martin there dwell seven bordars, with half a team. They render sixty shillings for the shoes of the Canons. St. Margaret renders eight pounds. (There is one rustic there.) The Thol of DOURE, in the time of King Edward, was worth eight pounds; now, twenty-two pounds. Three churches at Douer render thirty-six shillings and eight pence. From the pasture of Medrecliue and the gardens of Douere there issue nine shillings and four pence. One pasture in Sibertesttualt. It renders sixteen pence. St. Martin has ten mills and a half. They render seven pounds. In the time of King Edward, they rendered as much. Now, they are appraised at twelve pounds, but not to the profit of the Canons. In those mills reside eight Men. At SCORTEBROC one pasture. It renders two shillings. From this community the Archbishop has fifty-five shillings every year. There are six Men there, with one team and a half. In the common land of St. Martin there are four hundred acres and a half, which make two sulings and a half. This land never rendered any custom or scot, because the twenty-four sulings acquit all these. At RlPA there are one hundred acres which acquit themselves where they acquitted themselves in the time of King Edward. At Nordeude there are fifty acres. And one hundred at Brand, which acquit themselves in the same place as the above. In this land there are three villans and nine bordars; they have one team and a half. All these, if the Canons had as their right is, would be worth to them sixty pounds every year; now, they have only forty- seven pounds and six shillings and four pence. Rannttlf de Columbels takes away from them one meadow. Rotbert de Romenel takes away from them every year twenty pence, and one saltwork, and one fishery. Herbert, Son of Ivo, gave the Bishop of Baieux a mark of gold for one of their mills, against their will; Lanbert one (mill ); Wadard one (mill ); Ralph de Curbespine, one. Alnod (cild), by Harold’s violence, took from St. Martin MERCLESHAM and Hauochesten, for which he gave the Canons an unequal exchange. Robert de Romenel now holds what the Canons always claim from him. HERE ARE NOTED THE HOLDERS OF LANDS IN KENT. I. King William. II. The Archbishop of Canterbury, III. and the Monks, and his men. IV. The Bishop of Rochester. V. The Bishop of Baieux. VI. The Abbey of Battle. VII. The Abbey of St. Augustine. VIII. The Abbey of Gand. IX. Hugh de Montford. X. Earl Eustace. XI. Richard de Tonebrige. XII. Haimo the Sheriff. XIII. Albert the Chaplain. 2 B 98 KENT. THE KING'S LAND. IN THE HALE LATH OF SUDTONE. IN ACHESTAN HUNDRED. 1. King William holds Tarentefort. It answers for one suling and a half. There is the arable land of forty teams. In demesne there are two teams. And one hundred and forty-two villans, with ten bordars, have fifty-three teams. There are three slaves there, and one mill. Of meadow, twenty-two acres. Of pasture, forty acres. Of wood, eight small and three large denns. Two hythes, that is two ports there. In the time of King Edward it was worth sixty pounds, and as much when Haimo (the Sheriff) received it. It is now appraised by the English at sixty pounds; but the Reve, a Frenchman, who holds it to farm, says that it is worth four score pounds and ten pounds. Yet he himself renders from that Manor seventy pounds weighed, and one hundred and eleven shillings in pence of twenty to the ore, and seven pounds and twenty-six pence by tale. Besides these, he renders to the Sheriff one hundred shillings. The Men of the hundred testify, that there have been taken away from this Manor of the King, one meadow, and one alder bed, and one mill, and twenty acres of arable land, and as much meadow besides as pertains to ten acres of arable land; all which were in King Edward’s Farm, while he lived. These are worth twenty shillings. They say also, that Osward, the then Sheriff, mortgaged them to Alestan, the Reve of London. And now, Helt, the Sewer, and his nephew, hold them. They testify also, that HAGELEI, which answers for half a suling, has been taken away from this Manor. The Sheriff held this land, and, when he lost the Shrievalty, it remained in the King’s Farm. So it remained also after the death of King Edward. Now, Hugh de Port holds it, with fifty-four acres more of arable land. All this is worth fifteen pounds. From the same Manor of the King six acres of arable land besides have been taken away, and a certain wood which the same Osward (the Sheriff) put out of the Manor by a certain mortgage of forty shillings. The Bishop of Rochester holds the Church of this Manor, and it is worth sixty shillings. Over and above this there are there three chapels besides. IN THE LATH OF ELESFORD, IN LAVROCIIESFEL HUNDRED. King William holds Elesford. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of fifteen teams. In demesne there are three teams. And forty villans, with five bordars, have fifteen teams. Eight slaves there. And one mill of forty pence. And forty-three acres of meadow. Wood of seventy hogs. Altogether it was worth, in the time of King Edward, fifteen pounds, and as much when TIaimo (the Sheriff) received it. Now, it is worth twenty pounds. Yet it renders thirty-one pounds. And the Sheriff has three pounds of it. Of this Manor, Ansgot holds, near Rochester, as much arable land as is appraised at seven pounds. The Bishop of Rochester also holds as much of this land as is worth seventeen shillings and four pence, in exchange for the land on which the castle stands. IN THE (HALF) LATH OF MIDDELTUNE, IN MIDDELTUN HUNDRED. King William holds Middeltune. It answers for four score sulings. Besides these, there are four sulings in demesne. And three teams there in demesne. In this Manor, three hundred and nine villans, with seventy-four bordars, have one hundred and sixty-seven teams. There are six mills there of thirty shillings. And eighteen acres of meadow. Twenty-seven saltworks there of twenty-seven shillings. Thirty-two fisheries there of twenty- two shillings and eight pence. Of Thol, forty shillings. Of pasture, thirteen shillings and four pence. Wood of two hundred and twenty hogs. And the Men of the Weald render fifty shillings for Inward and Averages. In this Manor are ten slaves. Altogether, in the time of King Edward, it was worth two hundred pounds by tale. And as much when Haimo (the Sheriff) received it. And now, likewise. Of this Manor, Hugh de Port holds eight sulings and one yoke, which in the time of King Edward were, with other sulings, in customary tenure. He has there three ploughs in demesne. This land which Hugh de Port holds is worth twenty pounds, which are computed in the two hundred pounds of the entire Manor of MiDDLETUN. The tenant renders one hundred and forty pounds assayed by fire, and by weight, and besides that, fifteen pounds and six shillings, less two pence, by tale. The Reve gives to Haimo (the Sheriff) twelve pounds. Of the King’s wood Wadard has as much as renders sixteen pence per annum; and he holds half a denn, KENT. 99 II. which a certain villan held in the time of King Edward. And Arnold Cild took away by violence two parts from a certain villan. The Abbot of St. Augustine holds the churches and tythes of this Manor. And forty shillings issue to him out of the King’s four sulings. IN THE LATH OF WIWARLET, IN FAVRESHANT HUNDRED. King William holds Favreshant. It answers for seven sulings. There is the arable land of seventeen teams. In demesne there are two. Thirty villans there, with forty bordars, have twenty-four teams. Five slaves there. And one mill of twenty shillings. And two acres of meadow. Wood of one hundred hogs, and of wood pasturage thirty-one shillings and two pence. A market of four pounds. And two saltworks of three shillings and two pence. And in the City of Canterbury, three Haughs of twenty pence belong to this Manor. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty pounds, less five shillings. And afterwards sixty pounds. It is now worth four score pounds. THE LAND OF THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY. In the City of Canterbury the Archbishop has twelve burgesses, and thirty-two messuages which the clergy of the town hold for their guild, and render thirty-five shillings. And one mill of five shillings. SANDWICE lies in its own hundred. This burgh the Archbishop holds, and it is for the clothing of the monks, and renders to the King the like service as DOVERE. And the Men of that burgh testify this, that before King Edward gave it to St. Trinity, it rendered to the King fifteen pounds. At the time of the death of King Edward, it was not at farm. When the Archbishop received it, it rendered fourteen pounds of farm, and forty thousand herrings for the sustenance of the monks. In the year in which this description was made, SANUUIC rendered fifty- pounds of farm, and herrings as formerly. In the time of King Edward there were three hundred and seven mes¬ suages with residencies there; now, there are seventy-six more, that is, together, three hundred and eighty-three. IN ACHESTAN HUNDRED. The Archbishop of Canterbury holds in demesne 'Parent. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land . In demesne there is one team. And twenty-two villans, with seven cotars, have seven teams. Six slaves there, and two mills of fifty shillings. To this Manor pertain five burgesses in Rochester. They render six shillings and eight pence. Eight acres of meadow there. Wood of five hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, it was worth fourteen pounds. When he received it, ten pounds. Now, fifteen pounds and ten shillings. Yet the tenant of the Manor renders eighteen pounds. The same Archbishop holds Otefort in demesne. It answers for eight sulings. There is the arable land of forty-two teams. In demesne there are six teams. One hundred and one villans there, with eighteen bordars, have forty-five teams. Eight slaves there. And six mills of seventy-two shillings. And fifty acres of meadow. Wood of one hundred and fifty hogs. Of this Manor ten Thanes hold one suling and a half, and have there in demesne three teams. And sixteen villans, with eleven bordars, having four teams. Five slaves there. And two mills of twenty-four shillings. And twenty-eight acres of meadow. Wood of thirty hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, and after¬ wards, it was worth Now, the demesne of the Archbishop is appraised at sixty pounds. That of the Thanes at twelve pounds. "What Richard de Tonebrige holds in his Lowy is appraised at ten pounds. The same Archbishop holds Sondresse. It answers for one suling and a half. There is the arable land of In demesne there are three teams. And twenty-seven villans, with nine bordars, have eight teams. Eight slaves there. And three mills and a half of thirteen shillings and a half, (i. e. sixpence). Eight acres of meadow there. Wood of sixty hogs. A Church there. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward it was worth twelve pounds. When he received it, sixteen pounds. And now, eighteen pounds. Yet it renders twenty-three pounds, and one Knight in the service of the Archbishop. IN HELMESTRE1 HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds Bix. It answered for three sulings in the time of King Edward, and now for two. 9-16 9-is 10-2 10 -:, 10-16 10-10 10-23 10-27 10-31 10-33 10-40 100 KENT. There is the arable land of . In demesne there are two teams. And forty-one villans, with fifteen bordars, have ten teams. A Church there. And three mills of forty-eight shillings. And eight acres of meadow. Wood of one hundred hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twelve pounds. And now, twenty pounds. And yet it renders thirty pounds and eight shillings. IN LITELAI HUNDRED. 10 - 4G The same Archbishop holds Erhede. It answers for four sulings. There is the arable land of eight teams. In demesne there are two. And twenty-seven villans, with two bordars, have eight teams. A. Church there. And 11— 1 three mills of fifty shillings and six pence. Five slaves there. And ten acres of meadow. Wood of forty hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, it was worth twelve pounds. And as much when he received it. Now, sixteen pounds. And yet it renders twenty-one pounds. IN THE LATH OF ELESFORT, IN LAVROCHESFEL HUNDRED. 11—6 The same Archbishop holds in demesne METLINGES. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of seven teams. In demesne there are three teams. And thirty-eight villans, with twelve bordars, have five teams. A Church there. And five slaves. And two mills of ten shillings. And twenty-one acres of meadow. Wood of sixty hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, it was worth nine pounds. Likewise, when he received it. And now, as much. And yet it renders fifteen pounds. IN TOLLENTREU HUNDRED. 1 1-12 The same Archbishop holds in demesne Norfleut. It answered for six sulings in the time of King Edward. And now, for five. There is the arable land of fourteen teams. In demesne there are two. And thirty-six villans have ten teams. A Church there. And seven slaves. And one mill of ten shillings, with one fishery. And twenty acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. When he received it, twelve pounds. And now, twenty-seven pounds. And yet it renders thirty- seven pounds and ten shillings. 1 l-is What Richard de Tonebridge holds of this Manor, in his Lowy, is worth thirty shillings. IN BROTEHAM HUNDRED. 11-20 The same Archbishop holds Broteiiam. It answers for eight shillings. There is the arable land of twenty teams. In demesne there are three teams. And seventy-six villans, with eighteen bordars, have fourteen teams. A Church there. And ten slaves. And three mills of fifteen shillings. And nine acres of meadow. Wood, when it is in bearing, of five hundred hogs. 11_25 Of this Manor William The Steward holds one suling. And has there one team in demesne. And two villans with half a team. H_27 Of the same Manor Goisfrid holds, of the Archbishop, one suling, and has there one team. And six villans, with one bordar, having two teams. H _29 Of the same Manor Farman holds, of the Archbishop, one yoke and a half. And has there three teams. And six villans, with twelve cotars, having two teams. Ten slaves there. 11-31 In the aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, this manor was worth fifteen pounds. And afterwards, sixteen pounds. Now, the demesne of the Archbishop is appraised at twenty-four pounds. And yet it renders thirty- five pounds. That of the Knights, eleven pounds. 11-33 What Richard de Tonebridge holds in his Lowy is appraised at fifteen pounds. IN MEDDESTAN HUNDRED. 11-35 The same Archbishop holds Meddestane. It answers for ten sulings. There is the arable land of thirty teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And twenty-five villans, with twenty-one bordars, have twenty-five teams. A Church there. And ten slaves. And five mills of thirty-six shillings and eight pence. Two fisheries there of two hundred and seventy eels. Ten acres of meadow there. Wood of thirty hogs. 11-41 Of this Manor three Knights hold, of the Archbishop, four sulings. And have there three teams and a half in demesne. And thirty-two villans, with ten bordars, having six teams. And ten slaves. And they have a mill of five shillings. And thirteen acres of meadow. And two fisheries and a half of one hundred and eighty eels. And two saltworks. Wood of twenty-three hogs. KENT. 101 In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, this Manor was worth fourteen pounds. When he received it, twelve pounds. And now, the demesne of the Archbishop is worth twenty pounds. That of the Knights, fifteen pounds and ten shillings. The Monks of Canterbury have twenty shillings every year from two Men of this Manor. IN CETEHAM HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds Gelingham. It answers for six sulings. There is the arable land of fifteen teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And forty-two villans, with sixteen bordars, have fifteen teams. A church there. And three slaves. And three fisheries of forty-two shillings and eight pence. And one mill of sixteen shillings and eight pence. And fourteen acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. Of this Manor, a certain Frenchman holds the arable land of one team, and has there two bordars. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, this Manor was worth fifteen pounds. When he received it, twelve pounds. And now, twenty-three pounds; and yet it renders twenty-six pounds, less twelve pence. That which the Frenchman holds, forty shillings. IN ROCULF HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds Roculf. It answers for eight sulings. There is the arable land of thirty teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And four score and ten villans, with twenty-five bordars, have twenty-seven teams. A Church there. And one mill of twenty-five pence. And thirty-three acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. And five saltworks of sixty-four pence. And one fishery. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, this manor was worth fourteen pounds. When he received it, likewise. And now, thirty-five pounds. Besides this, the Archbishop has seven pounds and seven shillings. The same Archbishop holds Nortone in demesne. It answers for thirteen sulings. There is the arable land of twenty-six teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And four score and twelve villans, with forty bordars, have fifty-nine teams and a half. A Church there. And ten acres of meadow 7 . Wood of fifty hogs. In aggre¬ gate value, in the time of King Edward, this manor was worth twenty-four pounds and five shillings. And after¬ wards, as much. And now, it renders to the Archbishop fifty pounds and fourteen shillings and tw r o pence, and to the Archdeacon twenty shillings. Vitalis holds of this Manor, of the Archbishop, three sulings and one yoke. And twelve acres of arable land. And has there five teams. And twenty-nine bordars. And five slaves. And seven saltworks of twenty-five shillings and four pence. There is a Church there. And one small denn of wood. Altogether, it is worth fourteen pounds and six shillings and six pence. IN BOROWARTLEST. IN PITEHAM HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds PiTEHAM. It answers for seven sulings. There is the arable land of twenty teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And thirty-two villans, with twenty-one bordars, have nineteen teams. Two Chinches there. Two slaves there. And thirteen acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, this Manor was worth seventeen pounds and six shillings and three pence. And afterwards, as much. And now, it is worth twenty pounds. Of this Manor, Godefridus and Nigellus hold, of the Archbishop, one suling and a half and a yoke. And have there four teams. And four villans, with eight bordars, having three teams. Altogether, it is worth nine pounds. Of this, the Monks have eight shillings per annum. IN ESTURSETE HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds Estursete in demesne. It answers for seven sulings. There is the arable land of twenty teams. In demesne, there are four teams. And seventeen villans, with four score and three bordars, have sixteen teams. A Church there. And twelve mills of four pounds and five shillings. And one hundred acres of meadow. Wood of fifty hogs. In the time of King Edward fifty-two messuages in the City, pertained to this Manor, and now, there are not more than twenty-five, because the others have been destroyed for the new dwelling-house of the Archbishop. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twenty-four pounds and twelve shillings and six pence. Now, it is worth forty pounds. Of this Manor, five of the Archbishop’s Men have one suling and six yokes. And have there five teams and a half in demesne. And eight villans, with twenty-six bordars, having two teams. And three mills. And twenty-four acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. Altogether it is worth nine pounds. 12-27 13-1 KENT. 102 13-7 Of this Manor Haimo the Sheriff, has half a suling, of the Archbishop. And has there two teams. With five bordars. And one slave. And two mills of fifteen shillings. It is worth one hundred shillings. IN BERHAM HUNDRED. 13-9 The same Archbishop holds in demesne Burnes., It answers for six sulings. There is the arable land of fifty teams. In demesne, there are five teams. And sixty-four villans, with fifty-three bordars, have thirty teams and a half. A Church there. And two mills of eight shillings and six pence. And twenty acres of meadow. Wood of fifteen hogs. Of herbage, twenty-seven pence. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twenty pounds. Now, thirty pounds. IN BOLTUN HUNDRED. 13-16 The same Archbishop holds BoLTUNE in demesne. It answers for five sulings and a half. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams. And thirty-one villans, with thirty-one bordars, having fifteen teams. Four acres of meadow there. And a fishery of ten pence. A saltwork of sixteen pence. Wood of forty-five hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth fifteen pounds and sixteen shillings and three pence and one halfpenny. Now, it is worth thirty pounds and sixteen shillings and three pence and one halfpenny. IN GALE HELLE HUNDRED. 13-23 The same Archbishop holds Ciieringes in demesne. It answers for eight sulings. There is the arable land of forty teams. In demesne, there is one suling; and four teams and a half there. Twenty-six villans there, with twenty-seven bordars, have twenty-seven teams. Twelve slaves there. And one mill of forty pence. Twenty- five acres of meadow there. Wood of twenty-six hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty-three pounds. When he received it, as much. Now, it is valued at thirty-four pounds; and yet it renders sixty pounds. 13-29 The same Archbishop holds Pliichelei in demesne. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of twelve teams. In demesne, there are two teams and a half. And sixteen villans, with seven bordars, have eleven teams. Eight slaves there. And twelve acres and a half of meadow. Wood of one hundred and forty hogs. Alto¬ gether, in the time of King Edward, it was worth twelve pounds. When he received it, eight pounds. And now, fifteen pounds; and yet it renders twenty pounds. IN THE LATH OF ESTREI. IN WINGEHAM HUNDRED. 13-35 The same Archbishop holds WlNGEllAM in demesne. It answered for forty sulings in the time of King Edward. And now, for thirty-five. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are eight teams. And four score and five villans, with twenty bordars, having fifty-seven teams. Eight slaves there. And two mills of thirty-four shillings. Wood of five hogs. And two little woods for fencing. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, it was worth seventy-seven pounds. When he received it, likewise. And now, one hundred pounds. 13-41 Of this Manor William de Arcis holds one suling in Fletes, and has there in demesne one team. And four villans. And one Knight, with one team. And one fishery. With a saltwork of thirty pence. The whole is worth forty shillings. 13-44 Of the same Manor, five of the Archbishop’s Men hold five sidings and a half, and three yokes, and have there in demesne eight teams. And twenty-two bordars. And eight slaves. Altogether, it is worth twenty-one pounds. 13- 47 IN LINGEBRIGE HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds Merseham in demesne. It answered for six sulings in the time of King Edward. And now, for three. There is the arable land of twelve teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And thirty-nine villans, with five bordars, having sixteen teams. A Church there. And two mills of five shillings. And two salt- 14- 1 works of five shillings. And thirteen acres of meadow. Wood of thirty hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth ten pounds. Now, twenty pounds. IN LIMOWART LATH. IN BELICOLT HUNDRED. 14-3 The same Archbishop holds Aldintone in demesne. It answered for twenty-one sulings in the time of King KENT. 103 Edward. And now, for fifteen sidings. There is the arable land of one hundred teams. In demesne, there are thirteen teams. And two hundred villans, less ten, with fifty bordars, have seventy teams. A Church there. And thirteen slaves. And three mills of sixteen shillings. And three fisheries of twenty-one pence. One hundred and seventy acres of meadow there. Wood of sixty hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty-two pounds. And as much when he received it. Now, it renders one hundred pounds and twenty s hill ings. The same Archbishop holds the ville which is called St. Martin, and it pertains to Estursete, and lies in that hundred, and answers for one suling and a half. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams and thirty-six bordars. Seven burgesses in Canterbury, rendering eight shillings and four pence, pertain to this land. There are five mills of twenty shillings, and a small wood. In this ville, Ralph holds half a suling, of the Archbishop. And has there two teams in demesne. And five villans, with three bordars, having two teams and a half. In the time of King Edward it was worth seven pounds. The half suling of St. Martin, and the other half suling, were always worth four pounds. In Romenel there are twenty-five burgesses who pertain to Aldinton, the Archbishop’s manor, and they were and are now worth to the Lord six pounds. Of the same Manor of Aldinton, half a yoke and half a virgate lie in Limes. The Archbishop holds them in demesne, and has there one team and one villan, with eighteen bordars, having one team and a half. Seven pres¬ byters there, who render seven pounds and five shillings. There is the arable land of two teams. It is worth, and was worth, twelve pounds ; and yet it renders fifteen pounds. Of the same Manor, the Earl of Ow holds Estotinghes for one Manor. It answered for one suling and a half, in the time of King Edward. And now, for one suling only. There is the arable land of eight teams. In demesne, there are two. And twenty-seven villans, with thirteen bordars, having seven teams. And one mill of twenty-five pence. A church there. And twenty acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. And eight slaves. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth eight pounds. Now, ten pounds. IN MONIBERGE HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds Leminges in demesne. It answers for seven sulings. There is the arable land of sixty teams. In demesne there are four. And one hundred and one villans, with sixteen bordars, having fifty-five teams. A Church there. And ten slaves. And one mill of thirty pence. And one fishery of forty eels. And thirty acres of meadow. Wood of one hundred hogs. Thereto pertain six burgesses in Hede. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty-four pounds. And afterwards, forty pounds. And now, likewise. And yet it renders sixty pounds. Of this Manor, three of the Archbishop’s Men hold two sulings and a half, and half a yoke. And they have five teams there in demesne. And twenty villans, with sixteen bordars, having five teams and a half. And one slave. And two mills of seven shillings and six pence. And forty acres of meadow. Wood of eleven hogs. Two Churches there. Altogether, it is worth eleven pounds. IN SELEBRIST HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds NEWEDENE. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of There are twenty-five villans there, with four bordars, having five teams. There is a Market there, of forty shillings less five pence. Wood of forty hogs. Altogether, in the time of King Edward, it was worth one hundred shillings. When he received it, twelve pounds. And now, ten pounds. And yet the Reve renders eighteen pounds and ten shillings. THE LAND OF HIS KNIGHTS. IN ACHESTAN HUNDRED Ansgot holds, of the Archbishop, Forningeham. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams, and thirteen villans, with five bordars, having three teams and a half. Six acres of meadow there. Wood of twenty hogs. And Richard de Tonebrige has as much of the same wood in his Lowy. In the time of King Edward, this Manor was worth seven pounds. And now, eleven pounds. Of these, the Monks of Canterbury have four pounds for their clothing, and 14-10 14-15 14-19 14-21 14-26 14-32 14-38 14-13 15-2 KENT. 104 15-9 Ralph Son of Vnspac holds Elesford, of the Archbishop. It answers for six sulings. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are five teams. And twenty-nine villans, with nine bordars, have fifteen teams. Two churches there. And nine slaves. And two mills of forty-three shillings. And twenty-nine acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixteen pounds. And now, it is worth twenty pounds. 15-14 Of this Manor, Richard de Tonebrige holds as much wood as can produce a rental of twenty hogs, And one mill of five shillings, And one fishery, in his Lowy. 15-17 Malger holds, of the Archbishop, three yokes in Orpinton. And it answered for as much without Orpinton in the time of King Edward. Now, there are two yokes within Orpinton, and a third, without. There is the arable land of . In demesne, one team. And four villans, with one bordar, and four slaves, and half a team. And three acres of meadow. And wood of eleven hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth forty shillings. When he received it, twenty shillings. And now, fifty shillings. 15-23 TIaimo the Sheriff holds, of the Archbishop, Briestede. It answers for one suling and a half. There is the arable land of ten teams. In demesne, there are two. And twenty-four villans, with sixteen bordars, have twelve teams. A Church there. And fifteen slaves. And two mills of twenty-four shillings. Wood of four score hogs. And of herbage nine shillings and six pence. Altogether, in the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. And as much when he received it. And now, seventeen pounds. Abbot Alnod held this Manor of the Archbishop of Canterbury. 15-30 The Earl of Ow holds, of the Archbishop, Olecumbe. It answered for two sulings and a half in the time of King Edward. And now, for two only. There is the arable land of nine teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And twenty-three villans, with eight bordars, have seven teams. A Church there. And one mill of four shillings. And eight acres of meadow. Wood of four score hogs. Altogether, in the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. When he received it, eight pounds. Now, eleven pounds. Alfer held this Manor of the Archbishop. IN IiAIBORNE HUNDRED. 15-37 Ralph Son of Turald holds Boltone, of the Archbishop. It answers for half a suling; and lies in the six sulings of Holingeborne. There is the arable land of one team and a half. In demesne, there is one team. And three villans, with two bordars, have one team. A Church there. And two acres of meadow. And wood of sixteen hogs. Altogether, it is worth, and always has been worth, forty shillings. IN FAVRESIIAM HUNDRED. 15-43 Richard, the Archbishop’s Man, holds of him Levelant. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of • In demesne, one team. And two villans, with one bordar, have one team. Wood of five hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth thirty shillings. Now, twenty shillings. IN BOLTONE HUNDRED. 15- 46 The same Richard holds, of the Archbishop, Gravenel. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of • In demesne, is one team. And eight villans, with ten bordars, have two teams. Pive slaves there. And ten acres of meadow. And four saltworks of four shillings. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth a hundred shillings. Now, six pounds. Of these, the Monks of Canterbury have twenty shillings IN CALEHELLE HUNDRED. 16- s Godfrey The Sewer holds, of the Archbishop, Lebham. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable lancl of ■ In demesne, there are two teams. And fifteen villans, with two bordars, have fonr teams. Pour slaves there. And six acres of meadow. And one mill of seven shillings. And wood of ten hogs. Alto- gether, it is worth eight pounds. And yet it renders twelve pounds and ten shillings. IN THERHAM HUNDRED. The same Godfrey holds, of the Archbishop, half a suling in Scape. There is the arable land of 16-7 KENT. 105 In demesne, one team with two bordars. And four slaves. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth thirty shillings. Now, four pounds. And yet it renders one hundred shillings. IN ESTBEI HUNDRED. Osbern Son of Letard holds one yoke, of the Archbishop, in Bocolani). And has there in demesne one 16-10 team. And it is worth ten shillings. William Folet holds, of the Archbishop, Flexgdessa. It answers for half a suling. He has there six 16-12 villans, with one team and a half. I he same William holds Estenberge of the Archbishop. And it answers for half a suling. And he has IG-i-t there twelve villans, with a team and a half. These lands were worth, in the time of King Edward, forty shillings. When the Archbishop received them, ten shillings. Now, thirty shillings. IN HEN HUNDKED. Hugh de Montfort holds, of the Archbishop, SALTEODE. It answered for seven sulings in the time of King 16 —17 Edward. And now, for three sulings. There is the arable land of fifteen teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And thirty-three villans, with twelve bordars, having nine teams and a half. A Church there. And two slaves. And nine mills of twenty shillings. And thirty-three acres of meadow. Wood of four score hogs. To this Manor pertain two hundred and twenty-five Burgesses in the Borough of Heda. Between the Borough and Manor, it was worth, in the time of King Edward, sixteen pounds. When he received it, eight pounds. Now, altogether, twenty-nine pounds and six shillings, and four pence. IN ESTBAITES HUNDRED. William de Eddesham holds, of the Archbishop, BEREWIC for one Manor. It answers for half a suling. 16-25 There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there are two. And nine villans, with nine bordars, have one team and a half. Eighteen acres of meadow there. And wood of twenty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, seven pounds. And yet it renders eleven pounds. IN LAMPORT HUNDRED. Robert de Romenel holds, of the Archbishop, Lamport. It answers for one suling and a half. There is the 16-30 arable land of six teams. In demesne, there are two. And twenty-nine villans, witli nine bordars, have nine teams. Seven saltworks there of eight shillings and nine pence. To this Manor pertain twenty-one Burgesses who are in Romenel, of whom the Archbishop has three 16 —34 forfeitures, Robbery, Breach of the Peace, Foristel. But the King has all service from them. And they themselves have all the customs, and other forfeitures, in return for sea service, and are in the King’s hands. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth ten pounds. And now, sixteen pounds. William holds, of the Archbishop, Tilemanestone. It answers for one suling. In demesne, there are two 16—39 teams. And five bordars. Formerly, it was worth twenty shillings. Now, thirty shillings. THE LAND OF THE ARCHBISHOP’S MONKS. IN HELMESTREI HUNDRED. III. The Archbishop oe Canterbury holds ORPINTUN. It answered for three sulings in the time of Kin°- Edward. 17-s And now, for two sulings and a half. There is the arable land of . In demesne there are two teams And forty-six villans, with twenty-five bordars, having twenty-three teams. Three mills there of sixteen shillino- s and four pence. And ten acres of meadow. And five denns of Wood, of fifty hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, it was worth fifteen pounds. When he received it, eight pounds. And now, twenty-five pounds. And yet it renders twenty-eight pounds. There are two Churches there. IN THE LATH OF ELESFORD. IN LITEFELLE HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds Pecheiiam. It answered for six sulings in the time of King Edward. And now 17-y 1 d KENT. IOC lor five sidings and one yoke. There is the arable land of ten teams. In demesne, there are two. And sixteen villans, with fourteen bordars, have four teams and a half. A Church there. And ten slaves. And one mill. And six acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. 17-13 Of the land of this Manor, one Archbishop’s Man holds half a suling. And it gelded with these six sulings, in the time of King Edward ; although it did not pertain to the Manor except for scot, because it was free land. 17-15 Of the same Manor, Richard de Tonebrige holds two sulings and one yoke. And has there twenty-seven villans, having seven teams. And wood of ten hogs. And the whole is worth four pounds. In time of King Edward, the Manor was worth twelve pounds. When the Archbishop received it, eight pounds. And now, what he has is worth eight pounds. IN AIHORDE HUNDRED. 17-19 The same Archbishop holds Holixgeborde. It answers for six sulings. There is the arable land of twenty- four teams. In demesne, there are two. And sixty-one villans, with sixteen bordars, have twenty-three teams. A Church there. And twelve slaves. And two mills. And eight acres of meadow. Wood of forty hogs. Altogether, in the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twenty pounds. And now, it is worth thirty pounds. To this Manor is attached half a suling which never rendered scot. The Bishop of Baieux holds this of the Arch¬ bishop, by gafol. IN TOLLENTREN HUNDRED. 17-25 The same Archbishop holds Mepeham. It answered for ten sulings in the time of King Edward. Now, for seven. There is the arable land of thirty teams. In demesne, there are four. And twenty-five villans, with seventy-one bordars, have twenty-five teams. A Church there. And seventeen slaves. And sixteen acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In aggregate value, in the time of King Edward, it was worth fifteen pounds and ten shillings. When he received it, fifteen pounds. Now, twenty-six pounds. 17-29 Richard de Tonebrige has, in his Lowy, what is worth eighteen shillings and six pence. Wood of twenty hogs. IN MEDESTAN HUNDRED. 17-31 The same Archbishop holds Ferlaga. It answers for sLx sulings. There is the arable land of twenty-six teams. In demesne there are four. And thirty-five villans, with fifty-six bordars, have thirty teams. A Church there. And three mills of twenty-seven shillings and eight pence. Eight slaves there. And six fisheries of one thousand two hundred eels. Twelve acres of meadow there. Wood of a hunched and fifteen hogs. 17-36 Of the land of this Manor, Godfrey holds half a suling in fee. And has there two teams. And seven villans, with ten bordars, having three teams. And four slaves. And one mill of twenty pence. And four acres of meadow. And wood of thirty hogs. 17-39 The entire Manor, in the time of King Edward, was worth sixteen pounds. And afterwards, as much. And now, twenty-two pounds. What Abel now holds, six pounds. What Godfrey, nine pounds. What Richard, in his Lowy, four pounds. IN ESSAMELS HUNDRED. 17-42 The same Archbishop holds Clive. It answers for three sulings and a half. There is the arable land of six teams. In demesne, there is one team and a half. And twenty villans, with eighteen bordars, have five teams and a half. A Church there. And two slaves. And thirty-six acres of meadow. Wood of twelve pence. In the time of King Edward, the entire Manor was worth six pounds. And afterwards, seven pounds. And now, sixteen pounds. IN BOROWART LATH. IN TANET HUNDRED. 17- 47 The same Archbishop holds Monocstune. In the time of King Edward, it answered for twenty sulino-s. And now, for eighteen. There is the arable land of thirty-one teams. In demesne, there are four. And four score and nine villans, with twenty-one bordars, have twenty-seven teams. Two Churches there. And one mill of ten shil- 18- 1 lings. A new fishery there. And one saltwork of fifteen pence. Wood of ten hogs. In aggregate value, it was worth, in the time of King Edward, and afterwards, twenty pounds. And now, forty pounds. IN DUNEIIAMFORT HUNDRED. 18-3 The same Archbishop holds Geciiam. It answers for four sulings. There is the arable land of twelve teams. In demesne there are three. And twenty-nine villans, with sixty cotars, have sixteen teams and a half. A Church KENT. 107 there. And four mills of a hundred shillings. And thirty-five acres of meadow. And wood of thirty hogs. The entire Manor was worth, in the time of King Edward, and afterwards, twenty-two pounds. Now, thirty-two pounds. Of the land of this Manor, William, his Man, holds as much as is worth seven pounds. 18—s IN CANTERBURY HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds Nordeude. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of 18-9 In demesne, one team and a half. And seven villans, with twenty-six bordars, have two teams. To this Manor pertain a hundred burgesses, less three, in the City of Canterbury, rendering eight pounds and 18-11 four shillings. Eight mills there of seventy-one shillings. And twenty-four acres of meadow. Wood of thirty hogs. Altogether, it is worth, and was worth, seventeen pounds. In the same Borowart Lath lies a small burgh, called Seseltre, which properly pertains to the Archbishop’s 18-15 kitchen. One, named Blize, holds it of the Monks. In demesne, there is one team. And forty-eight bordars with one team. A Church there. And eight fisheries (with a gafol) of twenty-five shillings. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twenty-five shillings. And now, one hundred shillings. IN WIWARLET LATH. IN EAVRESHANT HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds PRESTETONE. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of six teams. 18-21 In demesne, there are three. And thirteen villans, with fourteen bordars, have three teams. A Church there. And one slave. And one mill without rent. And one fishery of two hundred and fifty eels. Two acres of meadow there. Wood of five hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth ten pounds. Now, fifteen pounds. IN FELEBERG HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds Certeham. It answers for four sulings. There is the arable land of fourteen 18-26 teams. In demesne, there are two. And sixty villans, with fifteen cotars, have fifteen teams and a half. A Church there. And one slave. And five mills and a half of seventy shillings. And thirty acres of meadow. And wood of twenty-five hogs. In the time of Kang Edward, and when he received it, it was worth twelve pounds. Now, twenty-five pounds. And yet it renders thirty pounds. The same Archbishop holds Gomersham. It answers for eight sulings. There is the arable land of twelve 18-32 teams. In demesne, there are two. And sixty villans, with eight cotars, have seventeen teams. A Church there. And two slaves. And a mill of twenty-five shillings. And twelve acres of meadow. Wood of forty hogs. In the time of King Edward, and when he received it, it was worth twelve pounds. Now, twenty pounds. And yet it renders thirty pounds. IN CERT HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds Certh. It answers for three sulings. There is the arable land of twelve teams. 18-37 In demesne, there are two. And thirty-six villans, with eleven cotars, have twenty-two teams and a half. Five slaves there. And two mills of six shillings. And a saltwork of six pence. And twenty-seven acres of meadow. And wood of one hundred hogs. In the time of King Edward, and when he received it, it was worth twelve pounds. Now, twenty pounds. And yet it renders twenty-seven pounds. IN CALEHELLE HUNDRED. The same Archbishop holds Letelcert. In the time of King Edward, it answered for three sulings". And 18-42 now, for two hides and a half. There is the arable land of In demesne, there are two. And nine¬ teen villans, with five bordars, have seven teams. Two mills there of five shillings and ten pence. And eleven acres of meadow. And wood of fifteen hogs. Of the land of this Manor, William holds, of the Archbishop, half a suling. And has there in demesne one 18—47 team, with four slaves. And ten acres of meadow. And wood of twenty hogs. The entire Manor was worth, in the time of King Edward, and afterwards, a hundred shillings. Now, eight pounds and eight shillings and four pence. What William holds is appraised at forty shillings. 108 KENT. 19-1 The same Archbishop holds Welle. In the time of King Edward, it answered for seven sulings. And now, for five. There is the arable land of eighteen teams. In demesne, there are four. And four score and one villans, with five bordars, have twelve teams and a half. Seven slaves there. And one mill of thirty pence. And twenty acres of meadow. Wood of four score hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth seventeen pounds and eleven shillings and four pence. When he received it, as much. Now, twenty-four pounds and four pence. And yet it renders forty pounds. IN THE LATH OF ESTREI. IN ESTIiEI HUNDRED. 19-8 The same Archbishop holds Estrei. It answers for seven sulings. There is the arable land of In demesne, there are three teams. And seventy-two villans, with twenty-two bordars, have twenty-four teams. A mill and a half there, of thirty shillings. And three salt works of four shillings. And eighteen acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. 19-13 And in Getinge the Monks of Canterbury hold half a suling, and one yoke, and five acres. And have there six villans, with two teams and a half. Altogether, in the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twenty-six pounds and ten shillings and four pence and one farthing. Now, thirty-six pounds and ten shillings and four pence and one farthing. 19—is The same Archbishop holds Edesiiam. It answers for seventeen sulings. There is the arable land of In demesne, there are two teams and a half. And one hundred villans, with fourteen bordars, have thirty- six teams. Thirteen acres of meadow there. And three slaves. Wood for fencing. 19-22 Of the land of this Manor, two Knights hold, of the Archbishop, three sulings. And have four teams there, in demesne. And eighteen villans, with five bordars, have one team. The entire Manor, in the time of King Edward, was worth forty pounds. W'hen he received it, likewise. Now, it renders forty-six pounds and sixteen shillings and four pence. And to the Archbishop, one hundred shillings by way of fine. What the Knights hold is worth eleven pounds. And yet they render thirteen pounds. IN HAME HUNDRED. 19—as The same Archbishop holds Werahorne. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one team. And six villans, with three bordars, have one team. Twelve acres of meadow there. And wood of six hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twenty shillings. And now, sixty shillings. IN LIMOWART LATH. IN BLACHEBORNE HUNDRED. 19-33 The same Archbishop holds Apeldres. In the time of King Edward it answered for two sulings. And now, for one. There is the arable land of eight teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And thirty-seven villans, with forty-one bordars, have eleven teams. A Church there. And six fisheries of three shillings and four pence. Two acres of meadow there. And wood of six hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth six pounds. Now, sixteen pounds and seventeen shillings and six pence. IN THE HUNDRED OF WI. 19-38 The same Archbishop holds one Manor, which answered for one suling in the time of King Edward. And now, for half. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one. And three villans, with four bordars, have two teams and a half. A Church there. And one mill of two shillings. And two slaves. And seven acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, fifty shillings. Now, four pounds. IN ROMENEL MARSH. 19-43 The same Archbishop holds Asmeslant. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of three teams. There are twenty-one villans there, having seven teams. It is worth, and was worth, fifty-three shillings. Of this land, William Folet has one yoke. And it is worth to him ten shillings a year. 19-47 SANDWIC,—it is written above,—pertains to the demesne of the Monks. KENT. 109 THE LAND OF THE BISHOP OF ROVECESTRE. IIII. The Bishop of Rochester holds Sudfleta. It answered for six sidings. There is the arable land of thirteen 20—2 teams. In demesne, there is one team. And twenty-five villans, with nine bordars, having twelve teams. Seven slaves there. And twenty acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. Now, it answers for five sulings. There is a Church there. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth eleven pounds. Now, twenty-one pounds. And yet, it renders twenty-four- pounds, and an ounce of gold. Of this Manor, there is in TONEBRIGE, as much of wood and of land as is appraised at twenty shillings. The same Bishop holds Estanes. In the time of King Edward, it answered for six sulings. And now, 20—9 for foui- sulings. There is the arable land of eleven teams. In demesne, there are two. And twenty villans, with twelve bordars, have eleven teams. A Church there. And four slaves. And seventy-two acres of meadow. And one mill of six shillings and eight pence. And one fishery of three shillings and four pence. Wood of sixty hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth thirteen pounds. And now, sixteen pounds. And yet, it renders twenty pounds, and one oimce of gold, and one Marse. Richard de Tonebrjge holds of that Manor as much wood as is worth fifteen shillings. 20-15 The same Bishop holds Fachesiiam. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of . 20-17 In demesne, there is one team. And fifteen villans, with three bordars, have four teams. A Church there. And 1 three slaves. And two mills of fifteen shillings. And four acres of meadow. Wood of thirty hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth seven pounds. Now, eight pounds. The same Bishop holds Laagafel, and Anschitil (the Presbyter) of him. It answers for one suling. There 20-22 is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And nine villans, with seven bordars, have two teams. It was worth seventy shillings. And now, a hundred shillings. IN BRONLEI HUNDRED. The same Bishop hold Bronlei. It answered for six sulings in the time of King Edward. And now, for 20-25 three. There is the arable land of thirteen teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And thirty villans, with twenty-six bordars, have eleven teams. One mill there of four shillings. And two acres of meadow. Wood of one hundred 'hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twelve pounds and ten shillings. Now, eighteen pounds. And yet it renders twenty-one pounds, less two shillings. The same Bishop holds Oldeham. It answered for six shillings in the time of King Edward. And now, for 20-31 three. There is the arable land of five teams. In demesne, there are two. And eighteen villans, with sixteen bordars, have six teams. Six slaves there. And one fishery. And sixty acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. A Church there. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth eight pounds. Now, twelve pounds. The same Bishop holds Mellingetes. It anwered for three sulings in the time of King Edward. And now, 20-36 for one and a half. There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there is one. And five villans, with six bordars, have two teams. A Church there. And one mill of two shillings. Wood of twenty hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth forty shillings. And now, four pounds. The same Bishop holds Totescliye. In the time of King Edward, it answered for three sulings. And now, 20-41 for one suling. There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there is one suling. And one team there. And ten villans, with two teams. A Church there. And one slave. And two acres of meadow. And wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth sixty shillings. And now, seven pounds. The same Bishop holds Esnoiland. In the time of King Edward, it answered for six sulings. And now, for 20-46 three. There is the arable land of six teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And ten villans, with six bordars, have six teams. A Church there. And five slaves. And three mills of forty shillings. And thirty acres of meadow. Wood of four hogs. • In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth six pounds. Now, nine pounds. 1 E 21-25 21-34 110 KENT. IN ESSAMELE HUNDRED. The same Bishop holds Coolestane. It answered for two sidings and a half in the time of King Edward. And now, for two only. There is the arable land of six teams. In demesne, there are two. And fifteen villans, with nine bordars, have five teams. A Church there. And two slaves. And one mill of thirty pence. And twenty acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth four pounds and ten shillings. And now, ten pounds and ten shillings. The same Bishop holds Danitone. It answered for two sulings in the time of King Edward. And now, for half a suling. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one. And six villans have there one team. A Church there. And four slaves. And four acres of meadow. Wood of fifteen hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth one hundred shillings. And now, seven pounds and fifteen sh illing s, The same Bishop holds HALLINGES. In the time of King Edward, it answered for six sulings. And now, for two and a half. There is the arable land of seven teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And fifteen villans, with nine bordars, have six teams. A Church there. And two slaves. And thirty acres of meadow. And Wood of five hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth seven pounds. Now, sixteen pounds. What Richard holds in his Lowy, is worth seven shillings. The same Bisnop holds Frandesberie. It answered for ten sulings in the time of King Edward. And now, for seven. There is the arable land of fifteen teams. In demesne, there are five teams. And forty villans, with twenty-eight bordars, have eleven teams. A Church there. And nine slaves. And one mill of twelve shi lling s And forty acres of meadow. Wood of five hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth eight pounds. And now, twenty-five pounds. What Richard holds in his Lowy, is worth ten shillings. IN THE HUNDRED OF ROVECESTRE. The same Bishop holds Borchetelle. In the time of King Edward, it answered for two sulings. And now, for one suling and a half. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And six villans, with three teams. Fifty acres of meadow there. And two mills of twenty shillings. In the time of Kin g Edward, and afterwards, it was worth six pounds. And now, ten pounds. In Rovecestre, the Bishop had, and still has, four score messuages of land, which pertain to Frandesberie and Borcstel, his own proper Manors. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, they were worth three pounds. Now, they are worth eight pounds. And yet they render eleven pounds and thirteen shillings and four pence a year. IN HOW HUNDRED. The same Bishop holds Estoches. In the time of King Edward, it answered for five sulings. And now, for three. There is the arable land of five teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And ten villans, with five bordars, have four teams. A Church there. And four slaves. And four acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth eight pounds and twenty pence. And yet, the Tenant renders thir¬ teen pounds and twenty pence. I his Manor was, and is, of the bishoprick of Rochester; but Earl Godwin, in the time of King Edward, bought it of two Men who were holding it of the Bishop; and this sale was made without his knowledge. But, afterwards, during the reign of King William, Archbishop Lanfranc dereyned it against the Bishop of Baieux ; and thence, the Church of Rochester is now seised of it. KENT. 11L THE LAND OF THE BISHOP OF BAIEUX. IN THE LATH OF SUDTONE. IN ACHESTAN HUNDRED. V. Of the Bishop of Baieux, Hugh de Porth holds Hagelei. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams. And fourteen villans, with three bordars, have four teams. Three slaves there. And twelve acres of meadow. And one mill of twenty shillings. And one denn of Wood, of five hogs. The entire Manor is now worth fifteen pounds, of twenty to the ore. In this Manor one Man holds twenty acres of arable land worth five shillings a year,—he is called Vluret, —he neither pertains to that Manor, nor could have a lord other than the King. Helto holds Svinescamp, of the Bishop. It answers for ten sulings. There is the arable land of fourteen teams. In demesne, there are three. And thirty-three villans, with three bordars, have thirteen teams. One Knight there. And ten slaves. And forty acres of meadow. Wood of three hogs. And five fisheries of thirty pence. And a sixth which owes service to the hall. And one Hythe of five shillings and four pence. Of the Wood of this Manor, Richard holds, in his Lowy, what is worth four shillings. The entire Manor was worth twenty pounds. And now, it is worth thirty-two pounds. Ralph Son of Turald holds, of the Bishop, ERCLEI. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams. And nine villans, with six cotars, have three teams. Three slaves there. And wood of ten hogs. The entire Manor was worth three pounds. And now, one hundred shillings. A certain woman held it. Ralph holds of the Bishop Eddintone. for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there. With four bordars. And two slaves. And one mill there of twenty-three shillings. The entire Manor is appraised at four pounds. In the time of King Edward, it was little worth. Lestan held it of King Edward. And, after his death, he turned himself to Alnod (Gilt). And now it is in claim. Ansgot de Rouecestre holds, of the Bishop, Mapledescam. for half a suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. With one villan. And four bordars. And four slaves. One acre of meadow there. And Wood of eight hogs, and sixteen pence more. It was worth four pounds. And now, one hundred and ten shillings. Eustan held it of King Edward. Adam Son of Hubert holds, of the Bishop, Redlege. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams. And six villans, with five bordars, have two teams. Five slaves there. And half an acre of meadow. And one denn of Wood, which Richard de Tonebrige holds. The Manor was worth three pounds. And now, four pounds and ten shillings. Siward held it of King Edward. Hugh de Port holds, of the Bishop, ElSSE. It answers for three sulings. There is the arable land of . Li demesne, there is one team. And twelve villans, with eight bordars, have three teams. A certain Knight there, having eight slaves, male and female. And land for one team. Besides this, Hugh has two Men holding half a suling, who, in the time of King Edward, could go whither they pleased without license. One land is called Didele, and the other SONINGES. There is arable land there for one team. And it is appraised at twenty shillings. The entire Manor was appraised at seven pounds. And now, likewise. What Richard de Tonebrige holds, is appraised at forty shillings. The King has two denns of it, which are appraised at seven shillings. Godric held it of King Edward. Goisfhid de Ros holds LOLINGESTONE. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of In demesne, there is one team. And four villans, with one cotar, have two teams. Seven slaves there. And six acres of pasture. Wood of twenty hogs. When he received it, it was worth sixty shillings. And now, one hundred shillings. The King has in his own hands what is worth ten shillings. Brixe Celt held it of King Edward. 112 KENT. Malger holds, of the Bishop, LOLESGESTONE. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of In demesne, there is one team. And three villans, with six bordars, have one team. Five acres of meadow there. The entire Manor was worth sixty shillings. Is' ow, seventy shillings. The King holds of that Manor what is worth ten shillings. Bruning held it of King Edward. The same Malger holds, in Ferlingeham, half a yoke of land. There is the arable land of three oxen. There are two oxen there. With one bordar. And two acres of meadow. It was worth, and is worth, fifteen shillings. Brunesune held it, and could turn himself, with his land, whither he chose. Of this Manor the King holds what is worth eight shillings. The same Malger holds, in PlNNEDENE, half a suling, of the Bishop. There is the arable land of seven oxen. There is one team there. With six villans. And six acres of meadow. It was worth, and is worth, sixteen shillings. Aluret held it in the time of King Edward, and could turn himself whither he chose. Osbern Pastforeire holds, in Lolingeston, half a suling, of the Bishop. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And three villans, with one bordar, and one slave, have one team. Five acres of meadow there. Wood of five hogs. And one mill of fifteen shillings, and one hundred and fifty eels. The King has Wood, of the new gift of the Bishop, and it is worth three shillings. The entire Manor was worth sixty shillings. Now, seventy-seven shillings. Sewart Sot held it in the time of King Edward, and could turn himself, with his land, whither he chose. Wadard holds, of the Bishop, half a suling in FERNINGEHAM. There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there are two teams. With one villan. And two cotars. And five slaves. Half a mill there of five shillings. And four acres of meadow. Wood of five hogs. Besides that half suling, Wadard holds, in the same ville, half a yoke, which never quitted itself to the King. Altogether, it was worth four pounds. And now, six pounds. Estan held it of King Edward, and could turn him¬ self whither he chose. The same Wadard holds, of the Bishop, MAPLESCAMP. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of two teams. They are there. With one villan. And four bordars. And five slaves. And one acre and a half of meadow. Wood of eight hogs and sixteen pence. It was worth three pounds. And now, six pounds. Ultan held it under Herald. Ernulf de Hushing holds FerninGEHA il. It answers for three yokes. There is the arable land of two teams. There are now there six oxen. With two villans. And three bordars. One mill there of ten shillings. And eight acres of meadow. Pasture for one hundred sheep. Wood of ten hogs and fourteen pence. The King has of the Wood of this Manor what is worth eight shillings. The entire Manor was worth three pounds. And now, forty shillings. Dering held it, and could turn himself whither he chose. Anschitil de Eos holds Tarent, of the Bishop. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team and a half. In demesne, there is one. And four villans, with four bordars, have one team. Three acres of meadow there. And two mills of eighteen shillings. Wood of three hogs. The King has of that Manor, of the new gift of the Bishop, what is worth ten pence. The entire Manor was worth, and is worth, one hundred shillings. Aluric held it of King Edward. In the same ville, the same Anschitil has one Manor, of the Bishop. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team and a half. Five villans. And five bordars there. And one mill of twenty shillings. Three acres of meadow there. And one slave. The entire Manor was worth sixty shillings. And now, seventy shillings. Osiert held it of King Edward. The same Anschitil holds, of the Bishop, Hortune. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of three teams. And there are four bordars there. And one mill of five sulings. And six acres of meadow. There is a Church there. And Wood of three hogs. The King has, of the new gift of the Bishop, as much Wood of this Manor as is worth five shillings. KENT. 113 The entire Manor was worth four pounds. And now, six pounds. Goran, held it of Bum, and could turn himself, with his land, whither he chose. The same Anschitil holds, of the Bishop, half a suling in the same Manor. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there in demesne. And eight villans, with six borders, have one team. One mill there of fifteen shillings. And nine acres of meadow. Wood of fire hogs. The entire Manor was worth forty shillings. And now, sixty shillings. Orbing held it of the King. The same Anschitil holds, of the Bishop, one suling in the same Manor. There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there is one team. And eight villans with two teams. One slave there. And eight acres of meadow. And half- a mill of five shillings. Wood of fifteen hogs. The entire Manor was worth four pounds. And now, one hundred shillings. Alward held it of Harold. These four Manors are now for one Manor. IN LITELAI HUNDRED. Robert Latinn holds, of the .Bishop, Loisnes. There is the arable land of seventeen teams. In demesne, there is one. And sixty villans, with three bordars, have fifteen teams. Two slaves there. And three cotars. And three fisheries of four shillings. And thirty acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. In the time of Kino- Edward, it was worth twenty pounds. When the Bishop received it, eighteen pounds. And now, twenty-two pounds. And yet the Tenant renders thirty pounds. This Manor, in the time of King Edward, answered for ten sulings. And now, for four sulings. Azor held it.. Ansgot holds, of the Bishop, Hov, which answers for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And five villans, with one team and a half.' And one mill of ten shillings. Two cotars there. And one slave. And twelve acres of meadow. Wood of three hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. When he received it, as much. And now, four pounds. Anschil held it of King Edward. The Abbot of St. Augustine holds, of the Bishop of Baieux, Plumestede. It answers for two sulings and one yoke. There is the arable land of five teams. In demesne, there is one team. And seventeen villans, with three bordars, have four teams. Wood there of five hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. When he received it, eight pounds. And now, as much. And yet the Tenant renders twelve pounds. Brixi Cilt held it of King Edward. IN HELMESTREI HUNDRED. Malger holds, of the Bishop, Rochelie. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of In demesne, there is one team and a half. And ten villans, with nine bordars, have two teams and a half. One mill there of twelve shillings. Wood of three hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. When he received it, three pounds. And now, one hundred shillings. Aluuard held it of King Edward. Ernulf de Hesding holds, of the Bishop, Ciresfel. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams. And twenty villans, with four bordars, have eight teams. Four slaves there. And one mill of ten shillings. And ten acres of meadow. And Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixteen pounds. And afterwards, twelve pounds. And now, twenty-five pounds. And yet, the Tenant renders thirty-five pounds. Tochi held it of King Edward. Adam Son of Hubert holds, of the Bishop, SUDCRAI. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams. And fourteen villans, with one bordar, have four teams. Six slaves there. And ten acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth six pounds. And afterwards, four pounds. And now, ten pounds. Toli held it of King Edward. The same Adam holds, of the Bishop, WiCHEHAM. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there, are two teams. And twenty-four villans have four teams. Thirteen slaves there. And one Church. And one mill of twenty pence. And one Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. And afterwards, six pounds. And now, thirteen pounds. Godric (son of Carle) held it of King Edward. 24-4 24-6 24-10 24-ig 24-23 24-28 24-34 24-39 24-45 24 - 50 25- i 2 F 114 KENT. 25-5 Goisfrid de Eos holds, of the Bishop, LaSELA. It answers for seven snlings. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are three teams. And thirty-one villans, with fourteen bordars, have sixteen teams. Ten slaves there. And one fishery of four score eels and ten. Wood of seventy-five hogs. The entire Manor, in the time of King Edward, was worth thirty pounds. When he received it, sixteen pounds. And now, what Goisfrid holds, twenty-four pounds. 25-9 What Bichard de Tonebrige holds, in his Lowy, is appraised at six pounds. 25-10 What the King holds of this Manor, twenty-two shillings. Brixi Celt held it of King Edward. 25-12 Anschitil de Eos holds, of the Bishop, Craie. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And seven villans, with six bordars, have one team. A Church there. And one acre of meadow. And three acres of pasture. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth four pounds. And now, three pounds. Leuric held it of King Edward. 25-16 The same Anschitil holds, of the Bishop, another Craie. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And seven villans, with five bordars, have one team. One mill there of forty-two pence. And five slaves. Wood of seven hogs. In the time of King Edward, and after¬ wards, it was worth four pounds. And now, three pounds. 25-20 These two lands were two Manors, in the time of King Edward. And now, they are in one Manor. Aluuen held it of Alnod Celt. IN THE HALF LATH OF SUDTONE. IN GEENVIZ HUNDEED. 25-22 The Bishop of Lisieux holds, of the Bishop of Baieux, GRENVIZ. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams. And twenty-four villans have four teams. And three bordars. And one cotar. And five slaves. Four mills there of seventy shillings. And twenty-two acres of meadow. And forty acres of pasture. And Wood of ten hogs. 25-26 These two sulings, in the time of King Edward, were two Manors. (Earl) Harold held one, and Brixi the other. And now, they are in one. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and together, they were worth eight pounds. And now, they are appraised at twelve pounds. 25-29 Haimo (the Sheriff) holds, of the Bishop, Alteham. It answers for one suling and a half. There is the arable land of twelve teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And forty-two villans, with twelve bordars, have eleven teams. Nine slaves there. And twenty-two acres of meadow. Wood of fifty hogs. In the time of Kin g Edward, it was worth sixteen pounds. When he received it, twelve pounds. And now, twenty pounds. Aluuold held it of the King. 25-34 The Son of Turald of Eochester holds, of the Bishop, Witenemers. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And eleven villans, with two cotars, have two teams. Four acres of meadow there. Wood of fifteen hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth one hundred shillings. When he received it, four pounds. And now, one hundred shillings. Anschel held it of King Edward. 25-39 Walter of Douai holds of the Bishop, Lee. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And eleven villans, with two cotars, have two teams. Two slaves there. And five acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, and when the Bishop received it, it was worth three poimds. Now, one hundred shillings. Aluetin held it of the King. William Son of Oger holds, of the Bishop, Cerletone. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of five teams. In demesne, there is one team. And thirteen villans have three teams. Two slaves there. And eight acres of meadow. Wood of five hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth seven pounds. Two brothers held this land of the King, for two Manors. Godihn and Aluuard. IN HELMESTEEI HUNDEED. 25-48 The same William holds, of the Bishop, Crai. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And eight villans, with one team and a half. And four cotars. And KENT. 115 one mill of ten shillings. One slave there. And Wood of six hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. And afterwards, three pounds. Now, four pounds. Goduin (Sot) held it of King Edward. Ansciiitil holds, of the Bishop, CROCTUNE. It answers for one suling and one yoke. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is nothing. But there are three villans, and four bordars there. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth one hundred shillings. And now, six pounds. Aluuin held this land of King Edward for two Manors. Gislebert Maminot holds, of the Bishop, Codeham. It answers for four sulings. There is the arable land of ten teams. In demesne, there are four. And fifteen villans, with six bordars, have six teams. A Church there. And eleven slaves. And two mills of fourteen shillings and two pence. Wood of forty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty pounds. And afterwards, sixteen pounds. Now, twenty-four pounds. The same Gislebert holds, of the Bishop, CilESTAN. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of ■ In demesne, there is one team. And four villans with one team. Wood of five hogs there. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth sixty shillings. Now, forty shillings. Sberne Biga held it of King Edward. Hugh, the nephew of Herbert, holds, of the Bishop, Sentlinge. It answers for one suling and a half. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams. And twenty villans with two teams. A Church there. And nine slaves. And six acres of meadow. And twenty acres of pasture. Wood of eight hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. And afterwards, six pounds. Now, eight pounds. Bonde held it of the Archbishop. IN BRUNLEI HUNDRED. Ansgot of Rochester holds, of the Bishop, Bacheham. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of eight teams. In demesne, there are two. And twenty-two villans, with eight bordars, have eight teams and a half. Twelve acres of meadow there. And four slaves. And one mill. And Wood of sixty hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth nine pounds. Now, thirteen pounds. Anschil held it of King Edward. IN THE LATH OF ELESFORD. IN LAVROCHESFEL HUNDRED. Adam holds, of the Bishop, Leleburne. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of In demesne, there are three teams. And sixteen villans, with two bordars, have seven teams. A Church there. And ten slaves. And one mill of seven shillings. And twelve acres of meadow. Wood of fifty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. When he received it, seven pounds. Now, eight pounds. Richard de Tonebrige holds, in his Lowy, what is worth twenty-four shillings. The King holds, of the new gift of the Bishop, what is worth twenty-four shillings and two pence. Turgis held this Manor of Earl Goduin. Anschitil holds, of the Bishop, EleNTUN. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there are two. And fifteen villans, with two bordars, have one team and a half. A Church there. And two slaves. And half a mill. And one denn of fifteen shillings. Wood of eight hogs. And one acre of meadow. In the time of King Edward, it was worth one hundred shillings. When he received it, sixty shillings. Now, one hundred shillings. Vluric held it of Alnod Celt. Haimo (the Sheriff) holds, of the Bishop, DlCTUNE. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there are two. And twenty villans, with five bordars, have three teams. A Church there. And six slaves. And one mill of ten shillings. And eight acres of meadow. And thirty-five acres of pasture. Wood of six hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. When he received it, one hundred shillings. Now, eight pounds. Sbern held it of King Edward. Vital holds, of the Bishop, SlFLETONE. It answers for three yokes. There is the arable land of one team. In demesne, there is one team and a half. And six villans, with one bordar, have half a team. Six slaves there. 26-1 26-3 26-8 26-13 26-17 26-22 26-28 26-32 26-36 26-42 26-48 116 KENT. 27-14 And one mill of ten shillings. Ten acres of meadow there. And thirty acres of pasture. In the time of King Edward, it was worth forty shillings. When he received it, four pounds. Now, one hundred shillings. In the time of King Edward, two Men, Leuuin and Vluuin, held this land in parage, and could turn themselves, with their land, whither they chose. Ralph Son of Turold holds, of the Bishop, AlGLESSA. It answers for three yokes. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And seven villans, with fourteen bordars, have one team. One slave there. And eleven acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth three pounds. Now, four pounds. What Richard holds, in his Low)', fifteen pence. The King, eight shillings and five pence, of the new gift of the Bishop. And in Rouecestre, the Bishop had three houses of thirty-one pence, which he took from that Manor into his own hands. Alnod Gilt held this Manor. Hugh de Port holds, of the Bishop, Pellesorde. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And one villan, with four bordars, have three oxen. A Church there. And two slaves. And five acres of meadow. And one acre of pasture. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty shillings. When he received it, thirty shillings. Now, forty shillings. Godric held it of Kin o- 27-20 Edward. The same Hugh holds, of the Bishop, RlESCE. It answers for two sulings and a half. There is the arable land of five teams. In demesne, there are two. And ten villans, with two bordars, have three teams. A Church there. And ten slaves. And one mill of ten shillings. And nine acres of meadow. Wood of five hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. When he received it, one hundred shillings. Now, six pounds. 27-2G Aluric held it of King Edward. The same Hugh holds, of the Bishop, Ofeiiam. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, nothing. Six villans there, with one bordar, have two teams. One mill there of fifty pence. And three slaves. And four acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth 27-31 forty shillings. When he received it, twenty shillings. Now, thirty shillings. Godric held it of King Edward. Rannulph de Columbels holds, of the Bishop, Essedene. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land °f ■ In demesne, there is one team. And nineteen villans, with three bordars, have three teams. Three slaves there. And eight acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, it was worth three pounds. 27-36 When he received it, four pounds. Now, five pounds. {Earl) Lewin held it. Rotbert Latin holds at farm, of the King, Totintune, of the new gift of the Bishop oe Baieux. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team and a half. In demesne, there is one. And three villans, with nine bordars, have half a team. Four slaves there. And five acres of meadow. Wood of two hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth thirty shillings. When he received it, twenty shillings. Now, forty shillings. 27-42 Ulnod held it of King Edward. The same Botkbkt holds in Totintune, at farm of the King, one yoke; and that is of the new gift of the Bishop op Baieux. And there is nothing there hut two acres of meadow. It is worth, and always was worth, ten 27-45 shillings. Goduin held it of King Edward. Ralph Son of Turald holds, of the Bishop, Eddintune. It answers for two sulings and a half. There is the arable land of five teams. In demesne, there are two. And six villans, with nine bordars, have one team. A Church there. And ten slaves. And two mills of eleven shillings and two pence. And twelve acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. When he received it, one hundred shillings. Now, six pounds. Agelred held it of King Edward. KENT. 117 IN TOLLENTREV HUNDRED. 28-1 Ralpii Son of Turold holds, of the Bishop, Meletune. It answers for one suliug and three yokes. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there is one. And twenty-one villans, with two bordars, have two teams. A Church there. And one mill of forty-nine pence. And a Hythe of twenty shillings. And three slaves. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. And afterwards, three pounds. Now, six pounds. What Richard holds, in his Lowy, five shillings in one Wood. Earl Leuuin held it. The same Ralph holds, of the Bishop, Ledesdune. It answers for two sulings and a half, and half a yoke. 28-7 There is the arable land of six teams. In demesne, there are two. And seventeen villans, with four bordars, have five teams. A Church there. And one slave. And three acres and a half of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth six pounds. And afterwards, a hundred shillings. Now, eight pounds. That which Richard has in his Lowy, twenty pence. The Bishop holds in his own hands, within the City of Rouecestre, four houses pertaining to this Manor, from which he has nine shillings and ten pence. (Earl) Lewin held it. Herbert Son of Iuo holds, of the Bishop, Gravesiiam. It answers for two sulings aud one yoke. There is 28-15 the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there is one. And four villans, with seven slaves, have two oxen. A Church there. And one Hythe. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. When he received it, as much. Now, eleven pounds. This Manor had been three Manors. In the time of King Edward, Leuric, and Uluuin, and Goduin held it. Now it is in one. Wadard holds, of the Bishop, Notestede. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of two 28-21 teams. In demesne, there is one. And four bordars there. And a Church. And four slaves. Wood of three hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. When he received it, three pounds. Now, five pounds. Vlstan held it of King Edward. IN LAVROCIiESFEL HUNDRED. 28-25 Ansciiitil holds, of the Bishop, Ofeham. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of In demesne, there is one team. And six villans, with two bordars, have one team. Four slaves there. And one mill of ten shillings. And seven acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. And, in the City of Rouecestre, one house rendering thirty pence. In tlie time of King Edward, the Manor was worth one hundred shillings. When he received it, four pounds. Now, four pounds and nine shillings. What Richard de Tonebrige holds is worth eleven shillings. Vluric held it of Alnod Cilt. Ralph de Curbespine holds, of the Bishop, BERLINGE. It answers for six sulings. There is the arable land 28-33 of . In demesne, there is one team. And ten villans, with fourteen bordars, have six teams. A Church there. And six slaves. And one mill of ten shillings, and three hundred and thirty eels. And a fisheiy of sixty eels. Twelve acres of meadow there. And pasture for fifty animals. Wood of forty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twelve pounds. When he received it, six pounds, Now, twelve pounds. Sbern Biga held it of King Edward. The same Ralph holds, of the Bishop, Borham. It answers for six sulings. There is the arable land of eight 28-40 teams. In demesne, there are two. And fifteen villans, with twenty bordars, have six teams. A Church there. And seven slaves. And one mill of six shillings. And ten acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. And when he received it, as much. Now, twelve pounds. I he Bishop of Rouecestre has houses of this Manor; and they are worth seven shillings. (Earl) Lewin held this Manor. IN LITEFELLE HUNDRED. Corbin holds, of the Bishop, Pecheiiam. * It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of six teams. 28-47 In demesne, there is one. And twelve villans have five teams. And eight bordars, And five slaves. And three acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twelve pounds. Now, eight pounds. And yet it renders twelve pounds. The King has of this Manor three denns, where four 29-1 villans dwell, and they are worth forty shillings. (Earl) Lewin held it. 2 G 118 KENT. 29-2 Richard de Tonebrige holds, of the Bishop, HasLOW. It answers for six sidings. There is the arable land of twelve teams. In demesne, there are three. And forty-seven villans, with fifteen bordars, have fifteen teams. A Church there. And ten slaves. And two mills of eleven shillings. And twelve fisheries of seven shillings and six pence. And twelve acres of meadow. Wood of sixty hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth thirty pounds. Eddeua held it of King Edward. 29-7 Ralph Son of Turold holds, of the Bishop, half a suling in ESTOCHINGEBERGE. In the time of King Edward, two free Men held it. And now, likewise. And it is worth twenty shillings. IN THE LATH OF ELESFORD. IN WACHELESTAN HUNDRED. 29-io Richard de Tonebrige holds, of the Bishop, Tivedele. It answers for one yoke. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there in demesne. And a Church. And Wood of two hogs. It is worth, and always was worth, fifteen shillings. Eddeua held it of the King. IN AIHORDE HUNDRED. 29-13 Hugh Nephew of Herbert holds, of the Bishop, HarIARDESHAM. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of six teams. In demesne, . Eighteen villans, with ten bordars, have four teams. A Church there. And eleven slaves. And two mills of eleven shillings and six pence. And seven acres of meadow. Wood of fifteen hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. When he received it, eight pounds. Now, ten pounds. Osward held it of King Edward. 29-19 The same Hugh holds, of the Bishop, Fereburne. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, . Four villans, with one team and a half. And two mills of forty pence. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. Afterwards, and now, three pounds. Aluuin held it of (Earl) Goduuin. 29-23 The same Hugh holds, of the Bishop, a yoke of free laud in Selesburne. And has there half a team. With one bordar. And five slaves. And one acre and a half of meadow. It is worth, and always was worth, twenty shillings. Aluuin held it of Earl Goduuin. 29-20 The same Hugh, and Adelold, the Chamberlain, hold, of the Bishop, Fredenestede. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, . Three villans have seven oxen. A Church there. And two acres and a half of meadow. And Wood of two hogs. It is worth, and always was worth, twenty shillings. Lewin held it of King Edward. 29-30 Adelold holds, of the Bishop, Esledes. It answers for three sulings. There is the arable land of twelve teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And twenty-eight villans, with eight bordars, have seven teams. A Church there. And eighteen slaves. Two arpends of vineyard there. And eight acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. And five mills of the villans. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixteen pounds. Likewise, when he received it. Now, twenty pounds. And yet it renders twenty-five pounds. (Earl) Lewin held it. 29—36 Ot this Manor the Abbot op St. Augustine has half a suling, which is worth ten shillings, in exchange for the Bishop of Baieux’s park. The Earl of Ow has four denns of that Manor, which are worth twenty shillings. 29-39 Ansgot de Rouecestre holds, of the Bishop, Audintone. It answers for two sidings. There is the arable land of three teams and a half. In demesne, there are two. And seven villans, with five bordars, have one team and a half. A Church there. And four slaves. And six acres of meadow. And one mill of three shillings and two pence. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth four pounds. Now, seven pounds. Goduuin and Aluuin held it of King Edward for two Manors. 29-44 The same Ansgot holds, of the Bishop, Stochingeberge. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land . In demesne, there is one team. And five villans, with nine bordars, have two teams. A Church there. And two slaves. And one mill of sixty-four pence. Wood of fifteen hogs. In the time of Kino- Edward, and afterwards, it was worth four pounds. Now, six pounds. Elueua held it of Kin g Edward. 29-48 Hugh de Port holds Alnoitone. It answers for three sulings. There is the arable land of eight teams. In KENT. 119 demesne, there are two teams. And eighteen villans, with six bordars, have six teams. A Church there. And eight slaves. And two mills and a half of seventeen shillings. Five acres of meadow there. Wood of forty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth nine pounds. And as much when he received it. Now, ten pounds. And yet it renders twelve pounds. To this Manor are adjoined three mansions of land in Rouecestre, and they render five shillings a year. Osuuard held it of King Edward. Adam Son of Hubert holds, of the Bishop, Sudtone. It answers for four sulings. There is the arable land of seven teams. In demesne, there are two. And eighteen villans, with five bordars, have four teams. A Church there. And four acres of meadow. And one mill. Wood of fifty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twelve pounds. When he received it, ten pounds. Now, fourteen pounds. And yet it renders eighteen pounds. {Earl) Lewin held it. The same Adam holds, of the Bishop, Certh. It answers for three sulings. There is the arable land of eight teams. In demesne, there is one. And twenty villans, with five bordars, have six teams. A Church there. And eight slaves. /And six acres of meadow. Wood of fifty hogs. Three arpends of vineyard there. And a park of beasts of the forest. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth twelve pounds. Alnod ( Gilt) held it. The same Adam holds, of the Bishop, Sudtone. It answers for one suling and a half. There is the arable land of eight teams. In demesne, there are two. And fifteen villans, with nine bordars, have four teams. A Church there. And ten slaves. And eight acres of meadow'. Wood of fifty hogs. In the time of Kin g Edward, and afterwards, it was valued at ten pounds. Now, twelve pounds. And yet it renders eighteen pounds. Leuenot held it {of King Edward). The same Adam holds, of the Bishop, Bogelei. It answer for two sulings. There is the arable land of two teams and a half. In demesne, there is one team. And two villans, with two bordars, have half a team. A Church there. And four slaves. And one mill of five shillings. And six acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. Of that Manor, one Man, Adam, holds one suling, and it is called Meelea. And he has there one team. And four villans with one team. And a Church. And two slaves. And wood of four hogs. The entire Manor, in the time of King Edward, was worth six pounds. And afterwards, as much. Now, seven pounds. Turgis held it of King Edward. The same Adam holds, of the Bishop, Langvelei. It answers for one suling and a half. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there are two. And seven villans, with five bordars, have three teams. A Church there. And seven slaves. And three acres of meadow. Wood of twenty-five hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. When he received it, fifty shillings. Now, nine shillings. Turgis held it of King Edward. The same Adam holds, of the Bishop, Otringedene. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one. And two villans, with four bordars, have half a team. Two slaves there. And one acre of meadow. Wood of five hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was valued at ten shillings. Now, thirty shillings. To this Manor pertain two messuages of land in Canterbury of twelve pence. Aluuard held this Manor of King Edward. The same Adam holds, of the Bishop, East Selve. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there in demesne. With one villan. And one bordar. And five slaves. Four acres of meadow there. Wood of four hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth twenty sliillings. Godric held it of King Edward. William Son of Robert holds, of the Bishop, WEST Selve. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of three teams and a half. In demesne, there are two. And a certain Frenchman, with ten villans, and one bordar, have one team and a half. Five slaves there. And one acre of meadow. And one mill of fifteen pence. Wood of fifteen hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth four pounds. Eddid held it of King Edward. To this Manor there pertained in Canterbury, in the time of King Edward, one house, rendering twenty-five pence. 30-1 30-5 30-io 30-is 30-so 30-21 30-33 30-39 30-43 120 KENT. Hugh Nephew of Herbert holds, of the Bishop, BOLTONE. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, nothing. But five villans have one team there. And two acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. A Church there. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth eight pounds. Now, six pounds. Aluuin held it of (Earl) Goduin. The same Hugh holds, of the Bishop, GODESELLE. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one. And five villans have one team and a half. A Church there. And two slaves. And two acres of meadow. And wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth four pounds. Edwin held it of King Edward, and could go, -with his land, whither lie chose. The same Hugh holds, of the Bishop, WlNOHELESMERE. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there in demesne. With three slaves. And a Church. And wood of five hogs. And, in the time of King Edward, three houses in Canterbury pertained to this manor, rendering forty pence. The whole, in the time of King Edward, was worth one hundred shillings, and afterwards, and now, forty shillings. Vluiet held it of King Edward, and could go whither he pleased. The same Hugh holds, of the Bishop, Estselve. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there in demesne. With one villan. And one bordar. And two slaves. Four acres of meadow there. And wood of four hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth forty shillings. Vluiet held it of King Edward. Goisfrid de Ros holds, of the Bishop, Oteiiam. It answers for one suling and one yoke. There is the arable land of two teams and a half. In demesne, there is one. And nine villans, with three bordars, have one team. A Church there. And two slaves. And one mill of five shillings. And three acres of meadow. Wood of eight hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. When he received it, three pounds. Now, four pounds. Aluuin held it of King Edward. Rotbert Latin holds at farm HERBRETITOV. Adelold held it of the Bishop. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And two villans, with one bordar, have two animals. And four acres of meadow there. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth and now is worth sixty shillings. And yet it is at farm for four pounds. Aluric held it of (Earl) Goduin. The same Rotbert holds at farm Brunfelle. Adelold held it of the Bishop. It answers for one suling There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams. And five villans, with ten bordars, have one team and a half. One mill there of six shillings and eight pence; And pasture of fifteen shillings. Twelve slaves there. And eight acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth four pounds. Now, one hundred shillings. Aluuin held it of (Earl) Goduin. To this Manor pertains certain free arable land, enough for three oxen, and it is worth five shillings. Ralph Curbespine holds, of the Bishop, Ttjrneham. It answers for three sidings. There is the arable land of eight teams. In demesne, there is one. And sixteen villans, with eighteen bordars, have four teams. A Church there. And six slaves. And one mill of six shillings. And four acres of meadow. Wood of forty hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth ten poimds. Now, twelve pounds. And yet it renders fourteen. Sbern Biga held it of King Edward. The same Ralph holds, of the Bishop, Fereburne. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And two villans. With one bordar. And two slaves. And one acre and a half of meadow. Wood of six hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth thirty shillings. Sbern Biga held it of King Edward. Odo holds, of the Bishop, GELINGEHAM. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team. In demesne, there are two. And six bordars have half a team. One mill there of sixteen shillings and seven pence. And thirteen acres of meadow. And eight acres of pasture. In the time of King Edward, it was worth forty shillings. When he received it, thirty shillings. Now, sixty shillings. KENT. 121 IN CETEHAM HUNDRED. Rotbert Latin holds at farm, of the Bishop, Ceteham. It answers for six sulings. There is the arable land 32-2 of sixteen teams. In demesne, there are three. And thirty-three villans, with four bordars, have ten teams. A Church there. And fifteen slaves. And one mill of thirty-two pence. And twenty acres of meadow. And six fisheries of twelve pence. Wood of one hog. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twelve pounds. Now, fifteen pounds. And yet it renders thirty-five pounds. (Earl) Godwin held it. IN THE LATH OF EILESFORD. IN ROVECESTRE HUNDRED. 32-10 The Son of William Tahum holds, of the Bishop, Delce. It answers for one suling and one yoke. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And five villans have two teams. Twelve acres of meadow there. Wood of one hog. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth three pounds. And now, seventy shillings. Godric held it of King Edward. Ansgot de Rouecestre holds, of the Bishop, Delce. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two 32-15 teams. And they are there, in demesne. And with one villan and five bordars. And six slaves. Twelve acres of meadow there. And sixty acres of pasture. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth one hundred shillings. Osuuard held it of King Edward. IN HOV HUNDRED. 32-id The same Ansgot holds, of the Bishop, Stoches. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of two teams. And they are there, in demesne. With seven bordars. One fishery there of two shillings. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth one hundred shillings. Now, one hundred and ten shillings. Ansciiil held it of King Edward. The Bishop of Baieux himself holds in demesne Hoy. It answered for fifty sulings in the time of King 32-23 Edward. And now, for thirty-three. There is the arable land of fifty teams. In demesne, there are four. And one hundred villans, less three, with sixty-one cotars, have forty-three teams. Six Churches there. And twelve slaves. And thirty-two acres of meadow. Wood of thirty hogs. The entire Manor, in the time of King Edward, was worth sixty pounds. When the Bishop received it, likewise. And now, as much. And yet, the tenant renders one hundred and thirteen pounds. To this Manor pertained nine houses in the City of ROUECESTRE, and they rendered six shillings, neither are 32-30 they taken away. Earl Goduin held this Manor. Of this Manor Richard de Tonebrige holds half a suling. And Wood of twenty hogs. In the time of King 32-32 Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth forty shillings. Adam, Son of Hubert, holds of the same Manor one suling, and one yoke, of the Bishop. And one Man of his 32-34 has in demesne half a team. And four villans with half a team. And one cotar. It is worth, and was worth, thirty shillings. Anschitil de Ros holds, of the same Manor, three sulings. And has there in demesne one team. And five 32-37 villans, with twelve cotars, have one team and a half. Five slaves there. And one mill of ten shillings. And twelve acres of meadow. And two fisheries of five shillings. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth six pounds. Now, six pounds and five shillings. IN TVIFERDE HUNDRED. Adam holds, of the Bishop, one yoke in Pinpa. There is the arable land of . He has there half a 32-41 team, with two slaves. And four acres of meadow. And half a fishery without rent. Wood of six hogs. In the time of King Edward it was worth six shillings, and afterwards five shillings. Now, ten shillings. And yet, it renders fifteen shillings. Godric held it of King Edward. Rannulf de Columbels holds, of the Bishop, FerlaGA. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land 32-40 of four teams. Rannulf does not hold more than three yokes. And has there in demesne one team. And ten a h 122 KENT. villans. With four cotars. They have three teams. A Church there. And seven slaves. And one mill of five shillings. And ten acres of meadow. Wood of fifteen hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth seven pounds. Alnod held it (of the King). 32- 51 Of that suliug, Rayneii holds one yoke, of the Bishop, in the Manor of PiNFE. And has there one team. With 33 - 1 nine slaves. And three acres of meadow. Wood of four hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twenty shillings. Now, forty shillings. Alnod ( Cilt) held it of King Edward. 33-9 Haimo holds, of the Bishop, Nedestede. It answers for three sulings. There is the arable land of six teams. In demesne there is one. And fourteen villans have five teams. A Church there. And fourteen slaves. And two mills of fourteen shillings. And a fishery of two shillings. And seven acres of meadow. Wood of thirty-five hogs. In the time of King Edward it was worth eight pounds. And afterwards, six pounds. Now, eight pounds and five shillings. Norman held it of King Edward. Of that Manor, the Bishop has thirty shillings for two haughs. 33-3 Pat, pu Son of Turald holds Otringeberge. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of five teams. In demesne there are two. And six villans, with eight bordars, have three teams. A Church there. And two mills of three shillings. And two acres of meadow. And a fishery of thirty eels. Wood of two hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth forty shillings. Now, six pounds. Leoeua held it of King Edward. To this Manor are attached three haughs in the City, rendering three shillings. 33 15 Hugh de Braiboue, holds of' the Bishop, Otrixberge. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne there is one. And nine villans, with four bordars, have two teams. Three slaves there. And one mill of sixteen pence. And three acres of meadow. Wood of two hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth four pounds. Now, one hundred shillings. Godil held it of King Edward. 33-20 Adelold held, of the Bishop, Testan, and Robert now holds it at farm. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams and a half. And seven villans, with three bordars, have one team. Twelve slaves there. And one mill of three shillings. And eight acres of meadow. Wood of twenty hogs. In the time of King Edward it was worth one hundred shillings. And afterwards, sixty shillings. Now, one hundred shillings. Eduuard held it of King Edward. In the time of King Edward, three brothers held this land for three Manors. Now, it is in one. 33-26 The same Adelold held, of the Bishop, Benedestede. And Robert holds it at farm. It answers for one yoke. There is the arable land of .In demesne, there is one team. With five slaves. And one acre of meadow. Wood of six hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twenty shillings. Now, forty shillings. Godric held it of Alnod (Gilt). 33-30 The same Adelold holds, of the Bishop, Bermelie. It answers for one yoke. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. With five slaves. And four acres of meadow. Wood of three hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth fifteen shillings. When he received it, twenty shillings. Now, forty shillings. Godric held it of Alnod (Gilt). IN MEDESTAN hundred. 33-31 Rotbert Latin holds at farm Boselev. It answered for seven sulings, in the time of King Edward. Now, for five sulings. There is the arable land of twenty teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And forty-seven villans, witli eleven bordars, have sixteen teams. Three mills there of thirty-six shillings and eight pence. And sixteen slaves. And twenty acres of meadow. Wood of fifty hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twenty-five pounds. Now, thirty pounds. And yet, Robert renders fifty-five pounds. Alnod (Gilt) held it. 33-39 Of this Manor, Helto held half a suling. And has there one team. With one bordar. And one Frenchman. And two acres of meadow. And Wood of six hogs. And it is worth forty shillings. Ralph Son of Turald holds, of the Bishop, Litelbrotehail It answers for one suling and a half. There is the arable laud of • In demesne, there is one team. And four villans, with four bordars, have 33-41 KENT. 123 two teams. Two slaves there. And two mills of four shillings. And two acres of meadow. Wood of five hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth forty shillings. Now, sixty shillings and fifty- four pence. Richard de Tonebrige has, in his Lowy, what is worth thirteen shillings. And Wood of fifty hogs. And the King has of the same Manor what is worth sixteen pence. In the time of King Edward, Goduin and Eduin held this land for two Manors. Adam holds, of the Bishop, Celca. It answers for three sulings. There is the arable land of seven teams. In demesne, there are two. And fourteen villans, with six bordars, have five teams. A Church there. And four slaves. And one mill of five shillings. And sixteen acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, it was worth seven pounds. And afterwards, one hundred shillings. Now, ten pounds. And yet, the tenant renders fourteen pounds. Of this Manor, there is in the King’s hands what is worth seven shillings, of the new gift of the Bishop. The Bishop retained in his own hands, in the City of Rochester, three haughs, which are worth fifty pence. In Exesse, there is one hide which justly pertains to this Manor. Goduin, Son of Dudeman, held it. Now Ranulf Peurel holds it. The same Adam holds, of the Bishop, Heciiam. It answers for five sulings. There is the arable land of twelve teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And twenty-four villans, with twelve bordars, have six teams and a half. Twenty slaves there. And thirty acres of meadow. A Church there. And one mill of ten shillings. And a fishery of three shillings. And, in Exesse, Pasture for two hundred sheep. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twelve pounds. And afterwards, six pounds. Now, fifteen pounds. In the time of King Edward, Goduin Son of Carle and Toli, held this land, for two Manors. The same Adam holds, of the Bishop, in Colixge, one suling and a half. There is the arable land of one team and a half. In demesne, there are two teams. And five villans have half a team. Four slaves there. And seven acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth forty shillings. Now four pounds. What Richard de Tonebrige holds, in his Lowy, is worth seven shillings. Yluuin held it of Earl Leuuin. The same Adam holds, of the Bishop, Biohelei. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of half a team. In demesne, there is half a team. And one villan with half a team. And two bordars. One mill there of five shillings. Vluuin held it of Earl Leuuin. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth ten shillings. Now, fifteen shillings. IN ESSAMELE HUNDRED. Ralph Son of Turald holds, of the Bishop, Arclei. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of half a team. And there are thirty acres of arable land there besides. In demesne, there is one team. And six villans have half a team. Twelve acres of meadow there. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth forty shillings. Now, four pounds. Honef held it of (Earl) Harold. Ansgot de Rouecestre holds HanEIIEST. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team In demesne, there is one team. And two villans. With four slaves. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty shillings. When he received it, thirty shillings. Now, forty shillings. Goduin held it of (Earl) Goduin. Ernulf de Hesding holds, of the Bishop, Clive. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, half a team. And two villans. And ten acres of meadow. And pasture of one hundred sheep. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth thirty shillings. Two brothers, Aluric and Okdric, held it of King Edward. 33-40 33- 40 34- i 34-6 34-s 34-12 34-15 34-19 34-21 34—25 34-30 34-31 KENT. 124 The same Ernulf holds, of the Bishop, HADONE. It answers for three yokes. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there, in demesne. And six villans, with one bordar, have one team. Six acres of meadow there. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth fifty shillings. Now, sixty shillings. Osuuard held it of King Edward. Odo holds, of the Bishop, in the same HADONE, one yoke. There is the arable land of half a team. In demesne, there is nothing. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards and now, it is worth twenty shillings. The same Odd holds, of the Bishop, Colinges. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of half a team. It is there. With one bordar. And four acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, and after¬ wards, it was worth twenty shillings. Now, thirty shillings. God held it of King Edward. Helto holds, of the Bishop, MELESTUN. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there. With five villans. And one acre of meadow. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth ten shillings. Now, thirty shillings. Vluuard ( Wit) held it of King Edward. IN THE HALF LATH OF MIDDELTONE. IN MILDETONE HUNDRED. Hugh de Port holds, of the Bishop, Tunestelle. It answers for three sulings and a half. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And nine villans with one team. And nine slaves. Wood of ten hogs. And a salt-work of twelve pence. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was ■worth seven pounds. Now, eight pounds. Osuuard held it of King Edward. The same Hugh holds, of the Bishop, CERCE. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one. And with five bordars. And one slave. And one mill of six shillings and eight pence. It is worth (six pounds) twenty shillings. Osuuard held it. The same Hugh holds, of the Bishop, Stepedoxe. Osuuard held it in the time of King Edward. And then it answered for one suling, less half a yoke. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is . With one slave. And five bordars. It is worth thirty shillings. The same Hugh holds, of the Bishop, Tangas. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there are two. And five villans with one team. A Church there. And four slaves. And one mill of eight shillings. Wood of four hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth seven pounds. Now, ten pounds and ten shillings. Osuuard held it. Of those sulings which Hugh de Port has, Osuuard held five at gafol. And three sulings, and one yoke and a half, which he took away from the King’s villans. IN BORWART LATH. IN BRIGE HUNDRED. Richard Son of William holds, of the Bishop, Borne. It answers for six sulings. There is the arable land of eight teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And forty-four villans, with three bordars, have ten teams. A Church there. And one slave. And four mills of sixteen shillings and eight pence. A fishery of six pence. Pasture, from which foreign men have ploughed eight acres of arable land. Wood of four hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eighteen pounds. When he received it, ten pounds. Now, nineteen pounds. The Bishop of Baieux himself holds in demesne, ILardes. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there is one. And nine villans with two teams. A Church there. And five slaves. Wood of twenty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth seven pounds. And afterwards, one hundred shillings. Now, seven pounds. And yet it renders ten pounds. Eduin held it of King Edward. The same Bishop holds in demesne STELLINGES. It answers for one yoke. There is the amble land of one team KENT. 125 and a half. In demesne, there is, nothing but one bordar. A Church there. Wood of two hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings, and afterwards, and now, forty shillings. Alret held it of King Edward. The same Bishop holds in demesne BuRNES. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of six 35-30 teams. In demesne, there are two. And twenty-five villans, with four bordars, have seven teams. A Church there. And six slaves. And one mill of thirty-eight pence. And one Salt Work of thirty pence. And half a fishery of four pence. From Pasture, forty pence. Wood of six hogs and a half. Lf.uinc held it of King Edward. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twelve pounds, and afterwards, seven pounds. Now, twelve pounds. And yet it renders eighteen pounds. When Hugh de Monfort held it, it was worth five shillings. These three Manors of the Bishop of Baieux, Rannulf holds at farm. 35-37 Rannulf de Columbels holds of the Bishop, Hardes. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of 35—38 four teams. In demesne, there is half a team. And nine villans have two teams. A Church there. And eight slaves. And thirteen acres of meadow. Wood of four hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth six pounds. And afterwards, four pounds. Now, one hundred shillings. Azor held it of King Edward. IN DONAMESFORD HUNDRED. The Bishop himself holds, in demesne, WlCKEHAM. It answers for four sulings. There is the arable land of 35-43 eleven teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And thirty-six villans, with thirty-two cotars, have nine teams. A Church there. And one Presbyter, who gives forty shillings a year. One Park there. And two mills of fifty shillings. And two Saltworks of thirty-two pence. And three fisheries of four shillings. And thirty-two acres of meadow. Pasture for three hundred sheep, and for thirty-one animals. Wood of fourscore hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty-five pounds. When he received it, twenty pounds. Now, thirty pounds. To this Manor there pertain, in CANTERBURY, three messuages, rendering six shillings and eight pence. Alured (Biga) held this Manor of King Edward. There is besides half a suling of free land attached to this Manor, which Sired held of Alured Biga. And 36—l now, Goisfrid the Son of Mala Terra holds it of the Bishop of Baieux. And it is worth, and always was worth, sixty shillings. In the Hundred and City of Canterbury. Adam Son of Hubert has, from the Bishop, four houses, and two 36-3 without the City,—which render eight shillings. IN THE SAME HUNDRED. Haimo, the Sheriff, holds, of the Bishop, Latintone. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of 36-6 a team and a half. In demesne, there is one team, with two bordars. A small grove there of twelve acres of pasture. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth three pounds. The same Haimo holds, of the Bishop, half a suling. And there is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, 36-10 there are two teams. And eleven bordars, with three teams. And sixteen acres of small wood. In the time of King Edward, it was worth one hundred shillings. And afterwards, six pounds. And now, nine pounds. In the time of King Edward, the Burgesses of Canterbury held this land, and down to the time of the Bishop of Baieux, Avho took it from them. IN LIMOWART LATH. IN FULCHESTAN HUNDRED. William de Arcis holds Fulciiestan. In the time of King Edward, it answered for forty shillings. And 36-16 now, for thirty-nine. There is the arable land of a hundred and twenty teams. In demesne, there are fourteen teams. And two hundred and nine villans. And fourscore and three bordars. Among them all, they have forty- five teams. Five Churches there, from which the Archbishop has fifty-five shillings. Three slaves there. And seven mills of nine pounds and twelve shillings. One hundred acres of meadow there. Wood of forty hogs. Earl Godwin held this Manor. Of this Manor, Hugh Son of William, holds nine sulings of the arable land of the Villans. And has there, in 36-23 demesne, four teams and a half. And thirty-eight villans, with seventeen bordars, who have sixteen teams. Three 2 I 12G KENT. Churches there. And one mill and a half of sixteen shillings and five pence. And one Saltwork of thirty pence. Wood of six hogs. It is worth twenty pounds. 36-29 Walter de Appeuile holds of this Manor three yokes and twelve acres of arable land. And has there one team in demesne. And three villans. With one bordar. It is worth thirty shillings. 36—30 Alured holds one suling, and forty acres of arable land. And has there, in demesne, two teams. With six bordars, and twelve acres of meadow. It is worth four pounds. 36-32 Walter Son of Engelbert holds half a suling and forty acres; and has there, in demesne, one team. With seven bordars. And five acres of meadow. It is worth thirty shillings. 36-34 Wesman holds one suling, and has there, in demesne, one team. And two villans, with seven bordars, having one team and a half. It is worth four pounds. 36-36 Alured the Sewer holds one suling and one yoke, and six acres of arable land. And has there, in demesne, one team. With eleven bordars. It is worth fifty shillings. 36-38 Eudo holds half a suling. And has there, in demesne, one team. With four bordars. And three acres of meadow. It is worth twenty shillings. 36-40 Bernard de S t Audoen four sulings. And has there, in demesne, three teams. And six villans, with eleven bordars, have two teams. Four slaves there. And two mills of twenty-four shillings. And twenty acres of meadow. Wood of two hogs. Three pounds issue out of one deun, and out of the land which is given to farm from these sulings. Altogether, it is worth nine pounds. 36-45 Baldric holds half a suling. And has there one team, and two villans, with six bordars. They have one team. And one mill of thirty pence. It is worth thirty shillings. 36-47 Richard holds fifty-eight acres of arable land. And has there one team. With five bordars. It is worth ten shillings. 36- 4S The whole of Fulciiestan, in the time of King Edward, was worth a hundred and ten pounds. Wien he received it, forty pounds. Now, what he has in demesne is worth one hundred pounds. What the above-said Knights hold, is together worth forty-five pounds and ten shillings. IN HONINBERG HUNDRED. 37- 1 The Bishop of Baieux holds, in demesne, Alham. It answers for six sulings. There is the arable land of twenty-four teams. In demesne, there are five teams. And forty-one villans, with eight bordars, have eighteen teams. A Church there. And eight slaves. And two mills of six shillings. And twenty-eight acres of meadow. Wood of one hundred hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth thirty pounds. And now, forty. And yet it renders fifty pounds. Ederic held this Manor of King Edward. IN ROVINDEN HUNDRED. 37-8 Adam Son of Hubert holds, of the Bishop, one denn, of half a yoke, which remained without the division of Hugh de Montfort, and lay in Belice. He has there two villans, with half a team. This is worth, and always was worth, ten shillings. IN STOTINGES HUNDRED. 37-11 Ansfrid holds, of the Bishop, in Bociielande, half a suling. And has there, in demesne, one team. With one villan. There is the arable land of two teams. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty shillings. When he received it, thirty shillings. Now, forty shillings. KENT. 127 IN ESTREA LATH. IN eSTRE HUNDRED. Ralf de Curbespine holds, of the Bishop, one yoke in Berfrestone. One poor woman there rendering three 37-15 pence and one halfpenny. This yoke is worth, and always was worth, ten shillings. Rannulf de Columbels holds one yoke there, which scotted in Hardes, and up to this day has not paid 37—is King’s Scot. Adelold held, of the Bishop, EsWALT. It answers for three sulings. There is the arable land of . 37-20 In demesne, there is one team. And six villans, with two bordars, have three teams. Two slaves there. And a small wood for fencing. In the time of King Edward, it was worth nine pounds. Now, fifteen. Alnod Cit held it of King Edward. Osbern Son of Retard holds, of the Bishop, one suling in Selinge. He has there one villan rendering two 37-24 shillings. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, and now, thirty shillings. Aluuin held it in the time of King Edward. The same Osbern holds, of the Bishop, Popeselle. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of 37-27 . In demesne, there are two teams. And one villan, with four bordars, have half a team. Two free Men held this land of King Edward. One, his Knight, holds half a yoke. And has there one team in demesne. The whole, in the time of King 37-30 Edward, was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, one hundred shillings. IN BEVSBE11GE HUNDRED. Ralph de Curbespine holds half a yoke in POFESSALE. And has there three oxen. In the time of King Edward, aud afterwards, it was worth four shillings. Now, eight shillings. Yluric held it of King Edward. IN BERHAM HUNDRED. Fulbert holds, of the Bishop, Beriiam. It answers for six sulings. There is the arable land of thirty-two teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And fifty-two villans, with twenty cotars, have eighteen teams. A Church there. And a mill of twenty shillings and four pence. Twenty-five fisheries there of thirty-five shillings, less four pence. From average, that is service, sixty shillings. From herbage, twenty-six shillings. And twenty acres of meadow. From pannage, a hundred and fifty hogs. From that Manor, the Bishop gave one Berewich, which is called IIuilAM to Herbertin, Son of Ivo. And lie has there one team, in demesne. And twelve villans with nine teams. And twenty acres of meadow. From the same Manor, the Bishop gave one suling to Osbern Paisforere. Aud two mills of fifty shillings. And there is one team, in demesne, there. And four villans with one team. The whole of Beriiam, in the time of King Edward, was worth forty pounds. When the Bishop received it, likewise. And yet it used to render him one hundred pounds. Now, by itself, Beriiam is worth forty pounds. And Hucham, ten pounds. And this which Osbern has, six pounds. And the land of one Rannulf, a Knight, is worth forty shillings. Stigand, the Archbishop, held this Manor; but it was not of the Archbishoprick ; but it was of the demesne farm of King Edward. IN WITENESTAPLE hundred. Vital holds, of the Bishop, SOANECLIVE. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of a team and a half. In demesne, there is one team. With eight cotars who render four shillings and six pence. W ood of twenty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty-one shillings. When Vital received it, twelve shillings. Now, thirty shillings. Eduuard held it of King Edward. 37-32 The same Vital holds, of the Bishop, one yoke in the same hundred. And has there half a team in demesne. 128 KENT. With four bordars rendering six shillings. There is the arable land of half a team. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edwabd, and afterwards, it was worth ten shillings. Now, twenty shillings. Vlsi held it of King Edward. IN THE LATH OF WIWARLET. IN FAVRESHANT HUNDRED. 38-10 Adam holds, of the Bishop, Ore. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there is one. And ten villans, with ten bordars, have two teams. Half a Church theie. And one mill of twenty-two shillings. And two fisheries without rent. And one Saltwork of twenty-eight pence. Wood of six hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds, and afterwards, sixty shillings. Now, one hundred shillings. Turgis held it of King Edward. 38-15 The same Adam holds, of the Bishop, Stanefelle. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there is one team. And ten villans have two teams. A Church there. And six slaves. And two acres of meadow. Wood of sixty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, forty shillings. Now, one hundred shillings. Turgis held it of {Earl) Goduin. 38-19 Hugh de Porth holds, of the Bishop, Nortone. It answers for four sulings. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And eighteen villans, with six bordars, have five teams. Three Churches there. And three mills without rent. And two fisheries of twelve pence. Wood of forty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. And afterwards, six pounds. Now, twelve pounds. Osuuard held it of King Edward. IN FELEBERGE HUNDRED. 38-25 Fulbert holds, of the Bishop, ClLLEHAM. It answers for five sulings. There is the arable land of twenty teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And thirty-eight villans, with twelve cotars, have twelve teams. A Church there. And six mills and a half, of six pounds and eight shillings. And two fisheries of seventeen pence, and pasture of eighteen shillings and seven pence. In the City of Canterbury, thirteen messuages pertain to this Manor, rendering fifteen shillings. And nine acres of meadow. Wood of fourscore hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth forty pounds. And afterwards, thirty pounds. Now, likewise, thirty pounds. And yet it used to render to the Bishop of Baieux fourscore pounds and forty shillings. Sired held it of King Edward. IN FAVRESHANT HUNDRED. 38-34 Hugh Nephew of Herbert holds, of the Bishop, Osfringes. It answers for seven sulings and a half. There is the arable land of twenty teams. In demesne, there are no teams. Twenty-nine villans there, with six bordars, have eleven teams. A Church there. And one mill of eleven shillings and eight pence. And a fishery of ten pence. And a Saltwork of four pence. And thirteen acres of meadow. Wood of fourscore hogs. 38-39 Of the lord of this Manor Herbert holds half a suling and three virges. And has there, in demesne, one team. And one villan, with ten bordars, having one team. 38-41 Richard de Maris holds half a suling of this Manor. And has there six villans, and one bordar, with one team. And one Turstin holds one yoke which renders five shillings. The entire Manor, in the time of King Edward, was worth twenty poimds. When Herbert received it, fifteen pounds. Now, twenty pounds. To this Manor, there pertains in Canterbury one messuage of thirty pence. held this Manor. 38- 46 Ansfrid holds, of the Bishop, Cildresham. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there is one. And four villans, with two bordars, have one team and a half. Five slaves there. And two acres of meadow. There is wood, but it renders nothing. Of this Manor, a certain Knight holds land for one team. Altogether, in the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, forty shillings. Now, four pounds. 39- 1 The same Ansfrid holds, of the Bishop, Ernoltun. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there is one. And eight villans, with two teams and a half. Two Saltworks there. And, in the City of Canterbury, one messuage of twenty-one pence. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. And afterwards, forty shillings. Now, one hundred shillings. Burnod held this Manor of King Edward. KENT. 129 Of that Manor, Rannulf holds ten acres, which lie next the City. He rendered forty-two pence, in the time of King Edward. The same Ansfrid holds, of the Bishop, MACHEHEVET. It answers for one yoke. There is the arable land of half a team. There are two villans there, rendering fifty pence. In the time of King Edward, it was worth fifty pence. Now, it is worth sixty pence. Seuuold held it, in the time of King Edward. The same Ansfrid holds, of the Bishop, BADELESMERE. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two teams and a half. In demesne, there is one. And ten villans have one team and a half. A Church there. And two slaves. And a fishery of twelve pence. Wood of four hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, sixty shillings. Now, four pounds. The Abbot of St. Augustine reclaims this Manor, because he had it in the time of King Edward. And the Hundred attest to him. But the son of the Man says that his father could turn himself where he chose. And the Monks do not assent to this. The same Ansfrid holds, of the Bishop, Peiiie. It used to answer for one yoke. There is one bordar there rendering five pence. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth sixteen shillings. Wlui held it of King Edward. The same Ansfrid holds, of the Bishop, Peiiie. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team. Three bordars there. And in the City one messuage of sixteen pence. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth twenty-four shillings. Vleueua held it of King Edward. Osbern holds, of the Bishop, Bociieland. It answers for three yokes. There is the arable land of one team. In demesne, there is one. And three villans, with two bordars, have half a team. Eight slaves there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. And afterwards, three pounds. And now, seventy shillings. Seuuard held it of King Edward. The same Osbern holds one yoke, of the Bishop, in the same Manor. And it answers for one team. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty shillings. And afterwards, and now, it is worth ten shillings. Leuuard held it of King Edward. Hugh de Porth holds, of the Bishop, Herste. It answers for three yokes. There is the arable land of one team. It is in demesne. With two bordars and two slaves. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth ten shillings. Now, thirty shillings. Osuuard held it of King Edward. Adam holds, of the Bishop, one yoke in Ore. And it answers for one yoke. There is the arable land of one team. Three villans now hold this at farm. And they render twenty shillings. And it has always been worth as much. There is a Church there. Leuuold held it of King Edward. Herfrid holds Trevelai. It answers for three sulings. There is the arable land of eight teams. In demesne, there is one. An d twenty-four villans, with five bordars, have six teams and a half. A Church there. And five slaves. Wood of twenty hogs. And in the City, three haughs of thirty-two pence. In the time of King Edward, it was worth seven pounds. And afterwards, six pounds. Now, eight pounds. Vlnod held it of King Edward. Herbert held, of the Bishop, NORDESLINGE. There is the arable land of one team. It answers for half a suling. Two bordars there render two shillings. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twenty shillings. Now, twenty-five shillings. Turgod held it of King Edward. Herbert Son of Iuo held these two Manors of the Bishop of Baieux. Turstin de Girunde holds, in Bociielande, one yoke, of the Bishop. And it answers for one yoke. I here is one villan there, rendering six shillings. It is worth, and always has been worth, twelve shillings. I urgot held it of King Edward. 89-6 39—s 89-11 39-15 39—is 39-21 39-25 39-29 39-32 39-36 39-40 39-40 39- 50 40 - 1 2 Iv 130 KENT. 40-4 Roger Son of Ansciiitil holds, of the Bishop, ESLINGES. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of one team. It is there in demesne. And one bordar has half a team. A Church there. And one mill of ten shillings. And two acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And after¬ wards, twenty shillings. Now, forty shillings. Vnlot held it of King Edward, and could go whither he chose with his land. 40-9 Fulbert holds, of the Bishop, ESLINGES. In the time of King Edward, it answered for five sulings. And now, for two. And so it did, after the Bishop gave the Manor to Hugh Son of Fulbert. There is the land of six teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And thirty villans have three teams. A Church there. And twenty-eight slaves. And one mill of ten shillings. Wood of thirty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. And when he received it, six pounds. Now, four pounds. And yet the Bishop had eight pounds. Sired held it of King Edward. 40-is The same Fulbert holds, of the Bishop, Dodeilvm. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And seventeen villans, with ten bordars, have two teams. A Church there. And six slaves. And half a fishery of three hundred herrings. And in the City of Canterbury five haughs of seven shillings and ten pence. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. The Bishop demised it to farm for ten pounds. When Fulbert received it, six pounds. And now, likewise. Sired held it of King Edward. 40-21 Richard holds, of the Bishop, RonGOSTONE. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of Two villans there have two teams. And they render six shillings. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards and now, is worth forty shillings.' Yluiet held it of King Edward. IN FERLEBERGE hundred. 40-25 Ansfrid holds, of the Bishop, Hortone. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team. It is there in demesne. And thirteen villans have half a team. One slave there. And two mills of one mark of silver. And eight acres of meadow. And one hundred acres of small wood. In the time of King Edward, it was worth.Afterwards, thirty shillings. Now, one hundred shillings. Godric held it of Kino- Edward. IN HUNDRED. 40-30 Adam holds, of the Bishop, Fanne. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team and a half. In demesne, there are two teams. And three villans. And three slaves. And a Church. And thirteen acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. Afterwards twenty shillings. Now, four pounds. Hugh de Montfort holds of it what is worth twenty shillings. 40-35 Wadard holds, of the Bishop, Berchyelle. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team. It is there in demesne. And three villans. And three slaves. And one mill of forty pence. And ten acres of meadow. And one alder-bed. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twenty shillings. Now, forty shillings. Werelin held it of the King. 40-40 The same Wadard holds, of the Bishop, CuHBE. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one. And nine villans,. with five bordars, have one team and a half. Fourteen acres of meadow there. Wood of five hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And after¬ wards, fifty shillings. Now, four pounds, and the service of one Knight. Leuret de Rochinge held it of Kin" Edward. 40- 45 Kalfs de CmiBESPiEE holds, of the Bishop, Betmontestun. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of six teams. In demesne, there are two. And twelve villans, with one bordar, have three teams. Thirty- three acres of meadow there. And Wood of forty hogs. Hugh de Montfobt holds of that Manor, in Wood and Pasture together, what, in the time of King Edward, was worth six pounds. And afterwards, and’now, as much. Ailrio held it of King Edward. 41- 1 Adei.old held, of the Bishop, Dene. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two teams. In KENT. m demesne, there is one team. And four bordars. And two slaves. And one acre of meadow. And Wood of seven hogs. Of that suling, Ralph de Curbespine holds one yoke and a half, which is worth, and always has been worth, ten shillings. Adelold had half a suling and half a yoke. And, in the time of King Edward, it was worth forty shillings. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, forty shillings. This land is in the King’s hands. Vlnod, and Waua, and Aluuard, and Vlueron, held this land of King Edward. And it was divided in three places. IN CALEHEVE HUNDRED. Ralph de Curbespine holds PrVENTONE, of the fee of the Bishop; and Hugh, of him. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of five teams. In demesne, there is one and a half. And seven villans, with seven bordars, hav6 three teams and a half. A Church there. And nine slaves. And* one mill of fifty-five pence. And twenty acres of meadow. Wood of sixty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. And afterwards, one hundred shillings. Now, six pounds. Sbern {Riga) held it of King Edward. The same Ralph holds three denns, which remained without the division of Hugh de Montfort, of Pistinges Manor. And there is one yoke of land there, and one virge. And there are three villans there. It is worth, and always has been worth, fifteen shillings. IN FERLIBERG HUNDRED. Herfrid holds, of the fee of the Bishop, ESSAMELESFORD. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team. In demesne, there is one team. And four villans, -with one bordar, have one team. Three slaves there. And eight acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And after¬ wards, forty shillings. Now, sixty shillings. Alric held of King Edward. IN BILISSOLD HUNDRED. Osbert holds, of William Son of Taum, Aldelose. Half a suling lies there. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one team. And three villans have half a team. In the time of King Edward, it was worth thirty shillings. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, forty shillings. This land is of the fee of the Bishop of Baieux, and remained without his division. Godric held it of King Edward, witli Bradeburxe Manor. IN LIMOWART LATH. IN OXENAI HUNDRED. Osbern Paisforer holds, of the Bishop, PALESTREI. It answers for three yokes. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one. And nine bordars have half a team. A Church there. And two slaves. And ten acres of meadow. And five fisheries of twelve pence. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth forty shillings. Now, sixty shillings. Eduui (the presbyter ) held it of King Edward. IN THE LATH OF ESTREI. IN BEVSBERGE HUNDRED. The same Osbern holds, of the Bishop, twelve acres of land which are worth four shillings a year. Hugh de Forth holds, of the Bishop, PESIXGES and Piiiam. They answer for two sulings. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams and a half. And six villans, with fourteen bordars, have one team. In the time of King Edward, they were worth a hundred shillings. And afterwards, nothing. Now, six pounds. Lefstan, and Leuuin, and Eluret, and Sired, and two others, held them in the time of King Edward, and could go whither they pleased with their lands. IN LIMOWART LATH. IN NEVCERCE. The Bisnop of Baieux holds, in demesne, BiLSVlTONE. It answers for four sulings. There is the arable land of fifteen teams. In demesne, there are five. And forty-seven villans, with twenty-seven bordars, have fourteen teams. A Church there. And ten saltworks of a hundred pence. And ten acres of meadow. Wood of fifty hogs. And two fisheries of five pence. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. And afterwards, thirty 132 KENT. pounds. Now, fifty pounds. And yet it renders seventy pounds of farm. Alnod (Gilt) held it. In this Manor the Bishop placed three denns which remained without the division of the Earl of Ow. IN LANTPORT HUNDRED. 41-45 Rotbert de Romenel holds, of the Bishop, Afettune. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there is one. And nine villans, with three bordars, have three teams and a half. Two slaves there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth one hundred shillings. And afterwards, fifty shillings. Now, four pounds. 41-49 The same Rotbebt holds, of the Bishop, in the Marsh, half a suling. And it answers for as much. There is the land of two teams. Eleven villans, with two bordars, have three teams there. And a fishery of two shillings. 41- 51 The same Robert has fifty burgesses in the burgh of ROMENEL. And of these, the King has all the service. And, in return for the service of the sea, they are quit of all custom but the three,—Robbery, breach of the peace, 42- 1 and forstel. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth forty shillings. Now, fifty shillings. Alsi held it [of Earl Goduin). 42-2 The same Robert holds, of the Bishop, half a suling in the Marsh. And it answers for as much. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is half a team. And fifteen villans, with two bordars, have three teams and a half. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth thirty shillings. Now, forty shillings. Six socmen held it in the time of King Edward. IN ROVINDENE HUNDRED. 42-6 The same Rotbert holds, of the Bishop, Benixdexe. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one team. And four villans, with nine bordars, have two teams. Wood there of five hogs. And one Church. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth forty shillings. Now, fifty shillings. Osier held it of King Edward. IN ADILOVTESBRIGE HUNDRED. 42-10 The same Rotbert holds, of the Bishop, half a yoke. And it answers for as much. One widow dwells there rendering'thirteen pence a year. It is worth, and always has been worth, ten shillings. Two socmen held it of Kin o- Edward, without halls and demesnes. 42-13 The same Rotbert holds, of the Bishop, half a denn of the Manor of Titentone, which Hugh de Montfort holds. And has there arable land for half a team. And one villan, with three bordars, and half a team. And two fisheries of five shillings. All this is worth, and has been worth, fifteen shillings. This land is without the division of Hugh. IN THE LATH OE ESTREI. in ESTREI HUNDRED. 42-18 Herbert holds, at farm, of the King, Rixgetone. It is of the fee of the Bishop. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams. And four villans, with seven bordars, have two teams and a half. One mill there of forty shillings. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. When he received it, one hundred shillings. Now, eight pounds. And yet it renders thirteen pounds. Eduuahd held it of King Edward. 42-23 Adam holds, of the fee of the Bishop, in Haholde, half a yoke. Ricule holds it of Adam.' And another half-yoke of Arnold*, Hekbebt holds of Huou the Nephew of IIeebeet. Each of these is worth twenty shillings. IN HEVSBERG HUNDRED. 42-26 Hugh holds Ewelle, of the .Bishop. It answers for three sulings. There is the arable land of In demesne, there is one team. And fifteen villans, with twelve bordars, hare two teams. Two mills there of forty- six shillings. And four acres of meadow. Wood of four hogs. In the time of King Edwaed, it was worth twelve pounds. And afterwards, one hundred shillings. Now, ten pounds. And yet it renders twelve pounds and twelve shillings. Edeic de Alham held it of King Edwaed. Of that Manor, Hugh de Mokwoet holds seventeen acres of arable land, and one denn and a half, which is appraised at seven shillings. KENT. 133 The same Hugh holds, of the Bishop, Wescliye. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And seventeen villans have two teams. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. When he received it, six pounds. Now, eight pounds. Of this Manor Hugh de Montfort holds two mills of twenty-eight shillings. Edric held it of King Edward. The same Hugh holds Soltone, of the Bishop. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And three villans, with one bordar, render four shillings and seven pence. In the time of King Edward, it was worth fifteen pounds. And afterwards, and now, thirty shillings. In this Manor dwelt Godric, and held twenty acres of his own Alod. The same Hugh holds in Dovere one mill, which renders forty-eight ferlingels of corn, and does not pertain to any Manor. Ansfrid holds, of the fee of the Bishop, in Leueberge, half a yoke. And has there one villan and one bordar. It is worth five shillings. Lewtn held it of King Edward. In the same place, there dwelt one Altet, who held two acres of King Edward in Alod; and held them of Ansfred. And it is appraised at six shillings. Ralph de Curbespine holds COLRET, of the Bishop. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team and a half. And six villans, with seven bordars, have two teams. Two slaves there. And four acres of meadow. It answers for two sulings. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, six pounds. Molleuf, held it of King Edward. The same Ralph holds Ewelle. It answers for three sulings. There is the arable land of In demesne, there is one team. And five villans, with four bordars, have two teams. Wood there of ten hogs. Of this Manor a certain Knight holds one suling of Ralph. And has there one team, with three bordars. The whole Manor, in the time of King Edward, was worth twelve pounds. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, forty shillings. And yet, what Ralph has renders four pounds. Hugh de Montfort has the Chief Lordship of the Manor. And five mills and a half there of six pounds. Molleue held it of King Edward. The same Ralph holds, of the Bishop, SvANETONE. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And two bordars with half a team. Of this land, Robert de Barbes holds one suling. And has there three villans, with half a team. And One Hugh holds one suling, and has there one team in demesne. And one bordar. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. When he received it, thirty shillings. Now, forty shillings. And yet it renders four pounds. Coloen held it of King Edward. The same Ralph holds, of the Bishop, Apletone. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of In demesne, there are two teams. With six bordars. In the time of King Edward, it was worth one hundred shillings. And afterwards, ten shillings. Now, forty shillings. Ascored held it of King Edward. Herfrid holds, of Hugh, BROCIIESTELE, and it is of the fee of the Bishop. In the time of King Edward, it answered for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And two slaves. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, sixty. Now, forty. When Herbert received it, three yokes. Now, two yokes. Vlnod held it of King Edward. Tursten Tinel, and his wife, hold to farm, of King William, one yoke and five acres in LEUEBERGE. And there are two villans, with two bordars, there. It is worth, and always has been worth, eight shillings. Boche held it of King Edward. IN THE LATH OF ESTREI. IN ESTREI HUNDRED. Ansfrid holds, of the Bishop, Gollesberge. It answers for two sulings and three yokes. There is the arable 42-33 42-3S 42-43 42-45 42-47 42-49 42- 54 43- i 43-4 43-ii 43-15 43-19 43-23 KENT. IU 43-26 land of In demesne, there are two teams. And twenty-four villans. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twelve pounds. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, nine pounds. In Sanduuic the Archbishop has thirty-two messuages pertaining to this Manor. And they render forty-two shillings and eight pence. And Adeluuold has one yoke which is worth ten shillings. held Thanes held this Manor in the time of King Edward, and then constantly dwelt there. two sulings of it in parage ; but they do not dwell there now. When Ansfrid received it, it made one Manor. 43-33 Turstfn holds, of the Bishop, GhenoltonE. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of In demesne, there are two teams. With two bordars. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, four pounds. Now, seven pounds. And yet it renders eight pounds. Eduuard held it of King Edward. 43-36 Osbert Son of Letard holds, of the Bishop, BEDESHAM. It answers for one yoke and a half. There is the arable land of In demesne, there is one team. With one villan, and four bordars. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, thirty shillings. Now, fifty shillings. Godesa held it of King Edward. 43-40 In the same Manor, ten Thanes hold of the same Osbern one suling and half a yoke. And the same have there four teams and a half. In the time of King Edward, it was worth one hundred shillings, and afterwards, thirty shillings. Now, sixty shillings. 43-43 Ansfrid holds, of the Bishop, Soles. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of In demesne, there are two teams. And eight villans, with half a team. In the time of King Edward, it was worth one hundred shillings, and afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, six pounds. Elmer held it of King Edward. 43-47 Ralph Son of Robert holds, of the Bishop, Hertange. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land In demesne, there is one team. And five villans, with two bordars, have two teams. In the of time of King Edward, it was worth forty shillings. And afterwards, ten shillings. Now, sixty shillings. Eddid held it of King Edward. 43-51 Osbern holds, of the Bishop, one yoke and a half in the same Hundred. He has seven bordars there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. And afterwards, ten shillings. Now, thirty shillings. Ernold held it of King Edward. IN BEVSBERGE HUNDRED. Hugh de Montfort holds, of the Bishop, one suling of waste land without his division, and he has laid it into the Manor of Neventone which he has within his division. And he has there one bordar. It is worth and always has been worth sixty shillings. IN ESTREI HUNDRED. Wibert holds half a yoke which he has laid into the gild of Dovere. And now it answers with the land of Osbert Son of Letard. And is worth four shillings a year. Osbern Son of Letard holds, of the Bishop, Hama. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of In demesne, there is one team. With one villan and two bordars. And two slaves. In the time of King Edward, it was worth fifty shillings. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, sixty shillings. Three Thanes held it of King Edward. 44-12 The same Osbern holds, of the Bishop, Cilledene. It answers for one suling and one yoke and ten acres. . In demesne, nothing now. But nine villans have there two teams and a half. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, thirty shillings. Now, forty shillings. Goduin held it of King Edward. And five other Thanes. Osbern placed their lands in one Manor. 44-17 Alured holds, of the Bishop, Midelea. It answers for three yokes and twelve acres. There is the arable KENT. 135 land of three teams. In demesne, there is one team and a half. And five villans, with nine bordars, have one 44-] 9 team. A Church there. And ten acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, forty shillings. Now, sixty shillings. Godric held it of King Edward. IN SUMMERDENE HUNDRED. Rotbert Latin holds six acres of land. And has there half a team. One Socman held this land. And, of 44-22 the new gift of the Bishop, he has, in the King’s hands, of Richard Son of Gislebert, ten villans with three teams. And wood of fifty hogs. And therefrom Rotbert renders six pounds of farm. Turstin holds, of the Bishop, Ticiieteste. It answers for one suling and a half. There is the arable land of 44-26 In demesne, there is one team. With four bordars. And a small coppice. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. And afterwards, forty shillings. Now, one hundred shillings. Edric de Aliiam held it of King Edward. The same Turstin holds, of the Bishop, one yoke in Wanesberge. And there are two bordars there. Tochi 44-30 held it of King Edward. The same Turstin holds, of the Bishop, one yoke in Ece. And there are four bordars there. 44-32 These two yokes, in the time of King Edward, were worth fifteen shillings. And afterwards, ten shillings. Now, twenty shillings. Osbert holds, of the Bishop, one yoke and ten acres in Masseberge. And there are two villans there with 44-34 half a team. Goduin held it of King Edward. The same Osbert holds, of the Bishop, fifteen acres in ESMETONE. And one presbyter dwells there. Each of 44-36 these, in the time of King Edward, was worth thirty shillings. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, thirty shillings. Sired held it of King Edward. IN ESTREI HUNDRED. Ralph de Curbespine holds, of the Bishop, two sulings in Walwalesere. There is the arable land of 44-40 . In demesne, there is one team and a half. And fourteen villans, with two teams and a half. Of this land, Robert has half a suling. And one team there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth three pounds and ten shillings. And afterwards, fifty shillings. Now, seven pounds. Wluuard held it of King Edward. Osbert Son of Letard holds, of the Bishop, one yoke in Ece. And there are three villans there. In the 44-45 time of King Edward, it was worth twelve shillings. And afterwards, six shillings. Now, sixteen shillings. Beknolt held it of King Edward. Ralph de Curbespine holds, of the Bishop, Essewelle. It answers for three sulings. There is the arable 44-48 land of . In demesne, there are three teams. And one villan, with seven bordars, have half a team. One slave there. It is worth six pounds. Molleue held it of King Edward. Osbern holds, of the Bishop, one Manor, which three free Men held of King Edward. It answers for one 45-1 suling and a half. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And one villan, with one bordar, have half a team. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth four pounds. Ralph de Columbers holds, of the Bishop, Selinges. It answers for one suling and a half. There is the 45-5 arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And four villans, with three bordars, have half a team and one team and a half. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. And afterwards, forty shillings. Now, a hundred shillings. Vluuic held it of King Edward. Ralph de Curbespine holds, of the Bishop, Danetone. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable 4 0-10 land of three teams. In demesne, there is one. And four villans, with two bordars, have one team. A Church there. And four messuages in Canterbury rendering six shillings, less one penny. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, sixty shillings. Molleue held it of King Edward. 130 KENT. 45-15 The same Ralph holds, of the Bishop, one yoke in BrocheSTELE. Which Molleue held of King Edward. And there is one villan there rendering thirty pence. IN BEVSBERGE HUNDRED. 45-17 Ralph de Curbespine holds forty acres of land, which Molleue held of King Edward. And there is one villan there, rendering six shillings. And it is worth as much. 45-20 Rannulph de Valbadon holds half a yoke in Hamestede, which two free Men held of King Edward, in BochelajS t de. And now, Rannulph says, that the Bishop of Baieux gave it to a certain brother of his. There is one villan there, rendering thirty pence. It is worth ten shillings. IN NUNN1BERG HUNDRED. 45-24 Anscihtil de Ros holds, of the fee of the Bishop, Acres, which two brothers held. And each had a hall. Now, it is for one Manor. And it answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one team and a half. And five villans, with five bordars, have one team. Wood of ten hogs. And a Church. In the time of King Edward, it was worth forty shillings. And afterwards, thirty shillings. Now, sixty shillings. IN BRICEODE HUNDRED. 45-29 Roger Son of Anschitil holds, of the fee of the Bishop, Hastingelai, which Ylnod held of King Edward. And it then answered for one suling. And now, for three yokes; because Hugh de Montfort holds the other part within his division. There is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there are two. And two villans, with six bordars, have one team. Four slaves there. And Wood of one hog. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, thirty shillings. Now, sixty shillings. VI. THE LAND OF THE CHURCH OF LABATAILGE. 45-36 The Abbot of St. Martin of TnE Place of the Battle, holds the Manor that is called Wl, which, in the time of King Edward, and now, answers for seven sulings. There is the arable land of fifty-two teams. In demesne there are nine teams. And one hundred and fourteen villans, with twenty-two bordars, have seventeen teams. A Church there. And seven slaves. And four mills of twenty-three shillings and eight pence. And one hundred and thirty-three acres of meadow. And the Wood of three hundred hogs from pannage. In the time of King Edward, it was worth fourscore pounds and one hundred shillings and eight pence. When he received it, one hundred and twenty-five pounds, and ten shillings, of twenty to the ore. Now, one hundred pounds, by tale. And if the Abbot had Sacs and Socs, it would be appraised at twenty pounds more. 45-46 Ralph de Curbespine holds one denn and one yoke of fhe land of the Socmen of this Manor, rendering six pence of Custom. And Adelulf two parts of one suling, rendering twelve pence. And Hugh de Montfort has two yokes, rendering three hundred eels and two shillings. And, in the time of King Edward, they rendered Sac and Soc. 45- 50 The Sac and Soc of twenty-two hundreds pertain to this Manor, and all forfeitures which justly pertain to the King. 46- 1 THE LAND OF THE CHURCH OF ST. AUGUSTINE. VII. IN THE HALF LATH OF SUDTONE. IN LITELAI HUNDRED. 46-3 The Abbot of St. Augustine has one Manor named Plumstede, which answers for two sulings and one yoke. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And seventeen villans, with six cotars, have six teams. Wood there of five hogs, from pannage. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth ten pounds. Now, twelve pounds. And yet it renders fourteen pounds and eight shillings and three pence. IN THE LATH OF ELESFORT. IN HAIHORNE HUNDRED. 46-10 The same Abbot holds Leiitiiam, which answers for five sulings and a half. There is the arable land of eighteen teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And forty villans, with seven bordars, have sixteen teams. KENT. 137 One slave there. And two mills of six shillings and eight pence. And eight acres of meadow. And Wood of 46-12 forty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty-eight pounds. And afterwards, sixteen pounds. Now, twenty-eight pounds. Of this Manor, Robert Latin holds one yoke, which is worth five shillings. IN BOROART LATH. IN BRIGE HUNDRED. 46-17 The same Abbot holds BORNE, which answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one. And nine villans, with one bordar, have one team. Two mills there of nine shillings and six pence. And four acres and a half of meadow. Wood of five hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth one hundred shillings. And afterwards, forty shillings. Now, one hundred shillings. The same Abbot holds the Manor of Lanport. And there is one suling and one yoke there. And it has 46-22 always been acquitted, and without Custom. And one yoke lies in another hundred which pertains to this Manor. And there were seventy burgesses in Canterbury pertaining to this Manor. In this Manor, there are two teams and a half in demesne. And twenty-eight villans, with sixty-three bordars, 46-26 have six teams. Seventeen acres of meadow there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty pounds. And afterwards, eighteen pounds. Now, twenty-five pounds and four shillings. IN DVNAMESFORT HUNDRED. The same Abbot holds Litebyrne, which answers for seven sulings. There is the arable land of twelve teams. 46-30 In demesne, there are three teams. And thirty-five villans, with fourteen cotars, have six and a half. A Church there. And thirty-eight acres of meadow. Wood of four hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty-five pounds. And afterwards, twenty pounds. Now, thirty-two pounds. Of that Manor, the Bishop of Baieux has in his park, as much as is worth sixty shillings. The same Abbot holds WARWINTONE. And the Bishop of Baieux gave it to him in exchange for his park. It 46-36 answers' for half a suling and forty-two acres of land. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there in demesne. With three cotars. And sixteen acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. And afterwards, forty shillings. Now, four pounds. Edric held this Manor of Sbern Biga. And now, Ralph holds it of the Abbot. IN ESTURAI HUNDRED. The same Abbot holds Esturai, which answers for five acquitted sulings. There is the arable land of twelve 46-41 teams. In demesne, there are‘two teams. And thirty-nine with thirty-two bordars, have twelve teams. A Church there. And ten mills of eight pounds. And seven fisheries of five shillings. And twenty-eight acres of meadow. From pannage, thirty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth fifty shillings. When the Abbot received it, forty-five pounds. Now, fifty pounds. And yet it renders fifty-four pounds. IN TANET HUNDRED. ST. MILDRED’S. The same Abbot holds Tanet Manor, which answers for forty-eight sulings. There is the arable land of sixty- 46-4S two teams. In demesne, there are two. And one hundred and fifty villans, with fifty bordars, have sixty-three teams. A Church there. And one presbyter, who gives twenty shillings a year. One saltwork there. And two fisheries 47-1 of three pence. And one mill. In the time of King Edward, it was worth fourscore pounds. When the Abbot received it, forty pounds. Now, one hundred pounds. Of that Manor, three Knights hold as much of the land of the villans as is worth nine pounds, when there is peace in the land. And they have there three teams. IN CISTELET HUNDRED. The same Abbot holds ClSTELET, which answers for twelve sulings. There is the arable land of thirty teams. 47—6 In demesne, there are five teams. And seventy-two villans, with sixty-eight bordars, have thirty-nine teams. A Church there of twelve shillings. And fourteen slaves. Fifty acres of meadow there. And forty-seven saltworks of fifty seams of salt. From pannage, a hundred and thirty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth fifty-three pounds. And afterwards, forty pounds. Now, seventy-eight pounds. There are three arpends of vine¬ yard there. 2 M 138 KENT. Of that Manor, four French Knights hold what is worth twelve pounds a year. IN FOREWIC HUNDRED. 47-13 The same Abbot holds one little burgh, which is called FOREWIC. King Edward gave two parts of this burgh to St. Augustine. But the third part, which had been Earl Goduin’s, the Bishop of Baieux granted to the same Saint, with the assent of King William. It answers for one yoke. There were a hundred messuages of land, less three, there, rendering thirteen shillings. Now, there are seventy-three messuages rendering as much. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth one hundred shillings. Now, eleven pounds and two shillings. 47-20 In the same place, there are twenty-four acres of land which St. Augustine always had; where there were, and are, six burgesses rendering twenty-two shillings. In that Burgh, Archbishop Lanfranc holds seven messuages of land, which, in the time of King Edward, paid service to St. Augustine. Now, the Archbishop takes the service away from it. 47—24 Near the City of Canterbury, St. Augustine has half a suling which was always acquitted. And there is one team there in demesne. With fifteen bordars. And seven acres of meadow. And, in the same place, there are four acres of land which four Nuns hold of the Abbot in alms, and render two shillings and one seam of meal. All this, in the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, is worth four pounds. IN THE LATH OF WIWARLET. IN FAVRESHANT HUNDRED. 47-30 The same Abbot holds WlRENTONE, which answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one. And nine villans, with one team. Two acres of meadow there. And five hogs from the pannage of the Wood. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. When he received it, forty shillings. Now, four pounds. IN AVI HUNDRED. 47-34 The same Abbot holds Esmerefel, and Ansciiitil of him. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there in demesne. With five bordars. And six acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, forty shillings. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, forty shillings. 47-37 In Darenden, Adam holds of the Abbot, half a suling. There is the arable land of half a team. There are two slaves there. And seven acres of meadow. It is worth, and always has been worth, twenty shillings. IN BOLTONE HUNDRED. 47-39 The same Abbot holds Setlinges Manor, without a hall, which answers for six sulings. There is the arable land of eleven teams. Nothing in demesne. Thirty villans there have ten teams. A Church there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth fifteen pounds. When he received it, eight pounds. Now, thirteen pounds and five shillings. IN CALEHEVE HUNDRED. 47-43 The same Abbot holds half a yoke in Rotinge, which, in the time of King Edward, answered for half a suling. There was, and is, there in demesne, one team. It is worth, and always has been worth, fifteen shillings. IN CERT HUNDRED. 47-46 The same Abbot holds one yoke, Rapentone, and Ansered of him. And it answers for one yoke. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one. With four bordars. Eleven acres of meadow there. And the fourth part of a Mill of fifteen pence. And Wood of ten hogs. And he has besides two yokes, which the Abbot gave him out of his demesne. And two villans there, with eight bordars. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth three pounds. Now, four pounds. IN FERLEBBERG HUNDRED. Ansfrid holds of the Abbot CHERINOHEHELLE. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one 48-1 KENT. 139 team. In demesne, there are two. And eight villans have one team and a half. In the time of Kang Edward, and afterwards, it was worth twenty shillings. Now, thirty shillings. IN THE LATH OF ESTREA. IN CORNELEST HUNDRED. The same Abbot holds Norborne. It answers for thirty sulings. There is the arable land of fifty-four teams. In demesne, there are three. And seventy-nine villans, with forty-two bordars, have thirty-seven teams. Forty acres of meadow there. And wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth fourscore pounds. When he received it, twenty pounds. Now, seventy-six pounds. Of the land of the villans of this Manor Oidelard holds one suling. And has there two teams. With eleven bordars. It is worth four pounds. Of the same land of the villans, Gislebert holds two sulings, less half a yoke. And has there one team. And four villans, with one team. It is worth six pounds. Wadard holds of that Manor, of the land of the villans, three sulings, less sixty acres. And has there one team. And eight villans, with one team. And two slaves. It is worth nine pounds. But he renders no service to the Abbot except thirty shillings, which he pays yearly. Odelin holds, of the same land of the villans, one suling. And has there one team. With three bordars. It is worth three pounds. Marcher holds, of the same land of the villans, what is worth eight shillings. Osbert Son of Letard holds, of the land of the villans, half a suling, and eleven acres of meadow, which is worth twenty-five shillings. He renders to the Abbot fifteen shillings. Rannulph de Columbers holds one yoke. It is worth fifty pence. Rannulpii de Valbadon holds one yoke, and renders fifty pence. Item, the abovesaid Oidelard holds, of this Manor, one suling, and it is called BEVESFEL. And he has there two teams. With ten bordars. It is worth six pounds. The same Abbot holds Mundingeham. It answers for two sulings and a half. There is the arable land of five teams. In this Manor, the land which the Monks hold never paid geld. And Wadard holds there, land which, in the time of King Edward, always paid geld. And, at that time, the Manor was in one. Now, the Monks have in demesne four teams. And twenty bordars with one team. And one Mill of sixteen shillings. And Wood of four hogs. A Church there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty-two pounds. And afterwards, ten pounds. The Abbot’s part, twenty-six pounds. Wadard holds in demesne there one team. And eight villans, with two bordars, having four teams. It is worth, and was worth ten pounds. He renders no service therefrom but thirty shillings a year to the Abbot. IN BEVSBERG HUNDRED. The same Abbot holds SiBERTESWALT. It answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there is one and a half. And eleven villans, with six bordars, have two teams and a half. A Church there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. When he received it, forty shillings. Now, six pounds. And yet it renders eight pounds. The same Abbot holds Platenout. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of In demesne, nothing. But four villans, with three bordars, have a team and a half. A small Wood there. Ralph de Curbespine has twenty-five acres of this land. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth twenty shillings. Yet it is appraised at forty shillings, because it is at farm. 48-2 48-5 48-io 48-12 48-u 48-18 48-20 48-21 48-23 48-24 48-25 48-27 48-35 48-38 48-43 48-45 140 KENT. IN PRESTETUN HUNDRED. 48- 48 The same Abbot holds Prestetune. It answers for five sidings. There is the arable land of eight teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And twenty-five villans, with seventeen bordars, have nine teams. A small wood there. 49- 1 Of this Manor Vital holds one siding and half a yoke. And has there in demesne two teams. And seventeen bordars with half a team. The entire Manor, in the time of King Edward, was worth ten pounds. When he received it, six pounds. Now, what the Abbot has is worth fourteen pounds. What Vital holds is worth one hundred shillings. 49-5 Ansfred holds, of the Abbot, tElvetone. It answers for half a suling and half a yoke. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And three villans, with three oxen in a plough. In that Manor, Ansfrid holds half a suling of the demesne of the Monks. And renders therefrom to St. Augustine one hundred pence a year. Godessa held it in Alod, and gave therefrom to St. Augustine, in alms, twenty- five pence in every year. In the time of King Edward, it was worth forty shillings. And afterwards, ten shillings. Now, sixty shillings. 49-13 -In the Lath, and in the Hundred of Estrei, St. Augustine has three virges of land. And there is one team in demesne. With five bordars. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten shillings. And afterwards, five shillings. Now, twenty shillings. IN LIMOWART LATH. IN STOTINGES HUNDRED. 49-17 Geoffrey holds Bodesham, of the Abbot. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two teams. And they are there. With eight bordars. Wood of fifteen hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, four pounds. A certain villan held it. 49-20 The same Abbot holds in Lanport two sulings and one yoke. There is the arable land of six teams. There are nine villans there, with four bordars, having six teams. Ten acres of meadow there. And Wood of two hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth six pounds. And afterwards, four pounds. Now, eight pounds. IN THE LATH OF WIWARLET. IN LANGEBRIGE HUNDRED. 49-25 The same Abbot holds Chenetone. In the time of King Edward, it answered for four sulings. And it lay in Borchemeres. There is the arable land of ten teams. There are thirty villans there, having ten teams. A Church there. villans held it in the time of King Edward. With these four sulings, St. Augustine has one yoke, quit of all king’s scot. And as much wood there as yields a produce of forty hogs, or fifty-four pence and one halfpenny, from pannage. All this, in the time of King Edward, was worth ten pounds. And afterwards, eight pounds. Now, twelve pounds and ten shillings. IN THE MARESS OF ROMENEL. 49-33 The same Abbot holds Bvrwar Maresc. It answers for two sulings and three yokes. There is the arable land of twelve teams. In demesne, there are four. And forty-four villans, with five bordars, have ten teams. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty pounds. And afterwards, ten pounds. Now, thirty pounds. 49-37 The Shire testifies that Bedenesmere belonged to St. Augustine, in the time of King Edward, and from him who held it, the Abbot had Sac and Soc. VIII. THE LAND OF ST. PETER OF GAND. IN GRENVIZ HUNDRED. 49-40 The Abbot of Gand holds, of the King, Levesham. And he held it of King Edward. And then, and now, it answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of fourteen teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And fifty villans, with nine bordars, have seventeen teams. Three slaves there. And eleven mills, with the gafol of the rustics, rendering eight pounds and twelve shillings. From the produce of the Port forty shillings. Thirty acres of meadow there. Of Wood, fifty hogs, from pannage. The entire Manor, in the time of King Edward, was worth sixteen pounds. And afterwards, twelve pounds. Now, thirty pounds. KENT. 141 IX. THE LAND OF HUGH DE MONTFORT. Hugs de Mostfort holds one Manor, Estwelle, which Frederic held of King Edward. And it answers for one suling. There are three yokes within the division of Hugh, and a fourth yoke is without. And it is of the fee of the Bishop of Baieux. Altogether, there is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And five villans, with five bordars, have one team and a half. Ten slaves there. And twelve acres of meadow. And Wood . In the time of King Edward, it was worth seventy shillings. And afterwards, thirty shillings. Now, seventy shillings. The same Hugh holds Haintone of the King. Which Ulsi, the Presbyter, held of King Edward. And it answers for one suling. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there. With one villan, and four bordars. And three acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, and now, it is worth twenty shillings. IN THE LATH OF WIWAKLET. IN LANGEBRIGE HUNDRED. Maigno holds, of Hugh, Seiyetone. Bresibalt held it of King Edward. And it answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there in demesne. With one villan, and six bordars. A Church there. And a Presbyter. And one mill of ten pence. And eight acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, it was worth thirty shillings. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, thirty shillings. The same Maigno holds, of Hugh, Estefort. Turgis held it of (Earl) Godwin. And it answers for one suling. There is the arable land of half a team. Yet, in demesne, there is one team. And two villans have one team. Two slaves there. And eight acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty- five shillings. When he received it, twenty shillings. Now, thirty shillings. The same Hugh holds Essella. Three Men held it of King Edward, and could go whither they pleased with their lands. It answers for three yokes. There is the arable land of one team and a half. Now, four villans, with two bordars, have one team there. And six acres of meadow. The whole, in the time of King Edward, was worth twenty shillings. And afterwards, fifteen shillings. Now, twenty shillings. Maigno holds another Essetesford, of Hugh. Wirelm held it of King Edward. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, there are two. And two villans, with fifteen bordars, have three teams. A Church there. And a Presbyter. And three slaves. And two mills of ten shillings and two pence. In the time of King Edward, it was worth seventy shillings. And afterwards, sixty shillings. Now, one hundred shillings. IN LIMOWART LATH. IN NEWCERCE HUNDRED. The same Hugh holds, in ROMNEY Marsh, one yoke. There is the arable land of . Two socmen held one half of this land. And two villans the other. Now, there are four villans there, having one team. This land was worth, and is worth, twelve shillings. The same Hugh holds half a yoke, which one socman held. There are two bordars there now. This land is appraised in TiTENTONE, because it is ploughed there with the demesne teams. The Hundred and the Burgesses of Doure, and the Men of the Abbot of St. Augustine and Estrealath, testify this. That the land of Etretone,- which the Canons of St. Martin of Doure claim against Hugh de Mont- fort, that Vlwile Wilde held it in alod, in the time of King Edward. And it answers for one yoke. And he has there one team in demesne. And five bordars with one team. And one mill of twenty shillings. It is worth, and has been worth, ten pounds. IN WERDE HUNDRED. The same Hugh holds ESTBRIGE in demesne. Alsi held it of (Earl) Godwin. And it answers for one suling. There is the arable land of six teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And two villans, with thirty-six bordars, have four teams. Eight saltworks there, with the third part of a ninth saltwork, of twenty shillings. Half a fishery of eight pence. Wood of three hogs from pannage. Two Churches there. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth ten pounds. Now, fifteen pounds. 50-2 50-8 50-12 50-ie 50-20 50-24 50-30 50-34 50-36 50-41 2 N 142 KENT. 50—47 Bertrann holds, of Hugh, half a yoke and half a virge. It answers for as much. Adelelm held it of King Edward. There is arable land for one team. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty shillings. 50- 49 Herue holds, of Hugh, Blachemenestone. Blacheman held it in the time of King Edward. There is the 51— 1 arable land of two teams. They are there in demesne. And three villans, with ten bordars, with one team. A Church there. And one slave. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. And afterwards, three pounds. Now, six pounds. 51-s The same Hugh holds, in Romney Marsh, one suling, less one virge. It answers for as much. There is the arable land of three teams. Fourteen socmen have three teams there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. And afterwards, three pounds. Now, one hundred shillings. 51-8 Roger holds, of Hugh, one yoke in Romney Marsh. It answers for one yoke. Two socmen held it. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there. With three bordars. In the time of King Edward, it was worth thirty shillings. And afterwards, fifteen shillings. Now, thirty shillings. 51-ii Rotbert holds, of Hugh, in the same Marsh, the sixth part of one yoke. One socman held it. It is worth, and was worth, five shillings. IN HEN HUNDRED. 51-14 Roger holds, of Hugh, Postinges. Sbern (Riga) held it. It answers for two sulings and a half. There is the arable land of thirteen teams. In demesne, there are three. And sixteen villans, with seven bordars, have seven teams. Two Chapels there. And two mills of six shillings. And forty acres of meadow. Wood of forty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. And afterwards, one hundred shillings. Now, fourteen pounds. Of that Manor Ralph de Curbespine holds three denns. They are without the division. And are worth fifteen shillings. 51-22 The same Hugh holds half a suling, which Aldred (Hot) held of King Edward, without a Hall. It answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of three teams. One villan dwells there, with four bordars. No team there. One mill of twenty-five pence. And five acres of meadow. 51-26 The same Hugh holds Belice. Turgis held it of King Edward. And it answers for one suling. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there is one team. And two villans, with one bordar, have one team. Three acres of meadow there. These two lands, in the time of King Edward, were worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, sixty shillings. IN NEWECERCE HUNDRED. 51-30 The same Hugh holds one land, which Azor (Rot) held of King Edward, without a Hall. It answers for one suling. There is the arable land of five teams. Eight villans, with three bordars, have two teams there. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth eight pounds. Now, nine pounds. 51-34 The same Hugh holds half a suling in Romney Marsh. It answers for as much. There is the arable land of four teams. Twelve socmen held it, and hold it, having four teams. It is worth, and was worth, sixty shillings. IN ADELOVESBRIGE HUNDRED. 51-37 The same Hugh holds, in the same Marsh, one yoke. It answers for as much. There is the arable land of two teams. There are twelve socmen there, with eight bordars, having two teams. 51-40 These two lands, in the time of King Edward, were worth one hundred and sixty shillings. And afterwards, and now, likewise. IN BLACHEBVRNE HUNDRED. 51-42 The same Hugh holds 'liNTENTONE. Vlnod held it of King Edward. And then it answered for one suling. Now, for half; because it is without the division. There is the arable land of five teams. In demesne, there are KENT. 143 two teams. And twenty-one villans, with six bordars, have seven teams. A Church there. And nine slaves. And 51-45 three fisheries of five shillings. And thirty-eight acres of meadow. Wood of .forty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twelve pounds. And afterwards, six pounds. Now, seven pounds. The same Hugh holds half a yoke, which five socmen held, and now hold, having one team there, with four 51—49 bordars. It is worth, and always has been worth, five shillings. IN ESTRAITES HUNDRED. Herue holds, of Hugh, Sedlinges. Osuuard held it of King Edward. It answers for one suling. There 52—1 is the arable land of seven teams. In demesne, there are three teams. And eight villans, with twenty-five bordars, have four teams, lwo Churches there. And one mill of thirty pence. And thirty-six acres of meadow. And Wood of six hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. And afterwards, one hundred shillings. Now, seven pounds. IN STOT1NGES HUNDRED. Alnod holds, of Hugh, Hortone. Leuuin held it of King Edward. And it answers for half a suling. There 52-8 is the arable land of three teams. In demesne, there are two teams. And five villans, with six bordars, have one team and a half. A Church there. And one mill of twenty-five pence. And twenty-four acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth forty shillings. And afterwards, twenty. Now, sixty shillings. In the same place, Alnod holds one yoke of Hugh. But there is nothing there. In the same Lath, the same Hugh holds three virges and a half, which three socmen held of King Edward. 52-15 Now, one villan has half a team there, with three bordars. It is worth, and always has been worth, ten shi llin gs, IN HAME HUNDRED. William holds, of Hugh, three yokes and half a virge, in Orlavestone. Eleven socmen held this land. 52-19 There is the arable land of three teams. Two teams there now in demesne. And fifteen villans, with nine bordars, have three teams and a half. Two Churches there. And twenty acres of meadow. Wood of six hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was w'orth sixty shillings. And afterwards, thirty shillings. Now, one hundred shillings. Ralph Son of Richard holds, of Hugh, half a suling in Rochinges, which Leuret held of King Edward. It 52-24 answers for half a suling. There is the arable land of two teams. Now, twelve villans have there one team and a half. From Wood, one hog. In the time of King Edward, it was worth fifty shillings. And afterwards, thirty shillings. Now, fifty shillings. IN STOTINGES HUNDRED. Ralph holds, of Hugh, Hortvn. Two socmen held it of King Edward. And it answers for one yoke and a 52-29 half. There is the arable land of one team and a half. In demesne, there is one. With four villans. And one mill of thirty pence. And ten acres of meadow. From Wood, six hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth forty shillings. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, thirty shillings. IN ESTRAITES HUNDRED. Hugh de Manneuile holds, of Hugh, Estraites. Vlnod held it of King Edward. It answers for two 52-34 sulings. There is the arable land of eight teams. In demesne, there are two. And eleven villans, with twenty- five bordars, have five teams. A Church there. And seven slaves. And thirty acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten shillings. And afterwards, four shillings. Now, eight pounds. Ansfrid holds, of Hugh, one yoke, which one socman held of King Edward, in the same Hundred. And it 52-39 answers for one yoke. There is the arable land of one team. It is there. With one villan, and two bordars. And one mill of twenty-six pence. And eight acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, and now, it is worth forty shillings. Rotbert Coc holds, of Hugh, one yoke, which one socman held. And it answers for as much. There is one 52-43 team there. With one bordar. And four acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, and now, it is worth thirty shillings. 144 KENT. IN LANGEBRIGE HUNDRED. 52-46 Gislebert holds, of Hugh, one yoke, which a certain socman held of King Edward. It is worth, and has been worth, four shillings. Nothing was or is there. 52- 49 Of Etwelle, which Herbert Son of Iuo holds without the division of Hugh, the same Hugh holds fourteen acres of land within his division. And it is worth two shillings. IN ESTREA LATH. IN BEVSBERGE HUNDRED. 53- 2 The same Hugh de Montfort holds Etwelle. Molleue held it. It answered for three sulings. And now, for one suling. There is the arable land of one team. And it is there in demesne. And nineteen bordars have one team. A Church there. And four mills and a half, of four pounds, and seventeen shillings, and four pence. And four acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eleven pounds. And afterwards, four pounds. Now, eight pounds. 53-7 The same Hugh holds Neventone. Ederic held it of King Edward. And it then answered for two sulings. And now, for one; because there is another without the division. There is the arable land of two teams. And they are there, in demesne. A Church there. And twenty-one bordars, and three slaves, with three teams. Three mills and a half, of one hundred and five shillings, there. The whole, in the time of King Edward, was worth twelve pounds. And afterwards, three pounds. Now, What Hugh has within his division, twelve pounds. 53-13 Within this division, there is one socman holding sixteen acres of land. And the same himself held it of King Edward. 53-15 In the same hundred, the same Hugh holds one portion of Broom Land, which neither renders, nor rendered, anything; nor has it been laid into any Manor; but is within his division; and was of the King’s demesne. Axuuin (the Presbyter) held it. 53-18 In the same hundred, Fulbert has, of Hugh, one mill, and renders twenty-four shillings. 53—19 Herfred holds, of Hugh, Poltone. Vluuin held it of King Edward. And it answers for one suling. There is the arable land of two teams. There are three villans there. And a Chapel. In the time of King Edward, it was worth forty shillings. And afterwards, fifteen shillings. Now, thirty shillings. IN WIWART LATH. IN BERISOUT HUNDRED. 53-23 The same Hugh holds Breburne. Godric de Buenes held it of King Edward. And it then answered for seven sulings. And now, for five sulings and a half, and half a yoke, because the other part is without the division of Hugh, and that the Bishop of Baieux holds. There is the arable land of fifteen teams. In demesne, there are two. And thirty-one villans, with ten bordars, have ten teams. A Church there. And eight slaves. And two mills of seven shillings. And twenty acres of meadow. Wood of twenty-five hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty pounds. And afterwards, eight pounds. Now, sixteen pounds. 53_30 In the Hundred of CERTH, a certain woman holds of Hugh, one virge, which one socman held of King Edward. It is worth three shillings. IN BLACHEBVRNE HUNDRED. 53-32 The same Hugh holds half a yoke, in Tepindene, which Norman held of King Edward. And it answers for half a yoke. There are two villans there, with half a team. It always has been worth, and is worth, an hundred pence. IN LIMOWART LATH. in ESTRAITES HUNDRED. 53—36 The same Hugh holds SiBORNE. Osiar held it of Bang Edward. And it answered for one suling, then, and now. There is the arable land of two teams. In demesne, there is one. And one villan, with four bordars, have KENT. N. 145 one team. And one slave there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, 53-38 twenty shillings. Now, four pounds. The same Hugh has half a suling, SVANETONE. There is the arable land of one team. Norman held 53-40 it of King Edward. And it answers for as much. Four villans, there, have one team. Wood of five hogs there. In the time of Kong Edward, it was worth twenty-five shillings. And afterwards, fifteen shillings. Now, thirty shillings. Nigell holds, of Hugh, one yoke. And, in Aia, seven acres. One socman held it of King Edward. There 53-44 is the arable land of one team. In demesne, is half a team. And six bordars. And two slaves. And five acres of meadow. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty shillings. And afterwards, ten shillings. Now, twenty-five shillings. William Son of Grosse holds, of Hugh, Bonintone. Norman held it of King Edward. And it answers for 53-48 one suling. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, is one. And nine villans, with four bordars, have two teams. A Church there. And eight slaves. And Wood of eight hogs. In the time of King Edward, it 54-1 was worth four pounds. And afterwards, three pounds. Now, one hundred shillings. Herue holds, of Hugh, Obtrepole. Alrebot held it of King Edward. And it answers for one suling. '^~ 3 There is the arable land of six teams. In demesne, is one. And eleven villans, with two teams. And one slave. And ten acres of meadow. And Wood rendering five pence from pannage, in the time of the King. In the time of King Edward, it was worth fifty shillings. And afterwards, twenty shillings. Now, four pounds. IN BLACHEBVRNE HUNDEED, AND IN NEVCERCE HUNDRED. Heraldus holds half a suling, less one virge. Six socmen held it of King Edward. And it answers for as 54-9 much. There is the arable land of five teams. In demesne, there are two. And thirty-one bordars have three teams. One slave there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth sixty shillings. And afterwards, thirty shillings. Now, four pounds and fifteen shillings. And he has, besides, one denn which lay in Fane, Adam’s Manor. There, there are two bordars rendering 54-13 thirty pence; It is worth, and always has been worth, five shillings. IN BERISCOLT HUNDRED. The same Hugh holds half a suling in HASTINGELIE. Vlnob held it of King Edward. And it answers for as 54-15 much. Now, a certain Man holds it of Hugh. And has there two bordars rendering four shillings. It always has been worth, and is worth, ten shillings. IN LANGEBRIGE HUNDRED. The same Hugh holds, in demesne, one yoke and a half, in Tevegate. God held it of King Edward. There 54-19 is one villan there now, with one team. And eight acres of meadow there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty shillings. And afterwards, ten shillings. Now, twenty shillings. In the same Hundred, is one virge of arable land in SvESTONE, which one socman held of King Edward. 54-23 There is one bordar there now, rendering twelve pence. In the time of King Edward, it was worth thirty pence. And afterwards, eighteen. Now, three shillings. THE LAND OF EARL EUSTACE. IN THE HALF LATH OE SUDTONE. IN OSTREHAM HUNDRED. Earl Eustace holds, of the King, Oistreham. (Earl) Godwin held it of King Edward. And it answered 54-28 for four s nlin gs, then, and now. There is the arable land of . In demesne, there are two teams. And forty-two villans, with seven bordars, have thirty teams. Ten slaves there. And one mill of five shillings. And sixteen acres of meadow. And, from Wood, an hundred hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth thirty pounds. When he received it, twenty-four pounds. Now, forty pounds. i o 146 KENT. IN THE LATH OF WIWARLET. IN WI HUNDRED. 54- 35 The same Earl holds BOLTVNE. Earl Goduin held it. And it answered for seven sulings, then, and now. There is the arable land of thirty-three teams. In demesne, there are three slaves. And sixty-seven villans, with five bordars, have thirty teams. A Church there. And seventeen slaves. And two mills of seven shillings and two pence. And twenty-six acres of meadow. Wood of two hundred hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twenty pounds. And. afterwards, thirty pounds. Now, forty pounds. XI. THE LAND OF RICHARD SON OF GISLEBERT. IN TVIFERDE HUNDRED. 55- 2 Richard de Tonebrige holds Hallinges. And Aldret held it of King Edward. And then, and now, it answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of sixteen ploughs. In demesne, there is one and a half. And sixteen villans, with twelve bordars, have six teams. Two Churches there. And fifteen slaves. And two mills of twenty-five shillings. And four fisheries of one thousand and seven hundred eels, less twenty. Five acres of meadow there. And Wood of one hundred and fifty hogs. In the time of King Edward, and afterwards, it was worth thirty pounds. Now, twenty pounds, because the arable land has been laid waste by cattle. IN MEDESTAN HUNDRED. 55-10 The same Richard holds Bermelinge. Axret held it of King Edward. And then, and now, it answers for one suling. There is the arable land of four teams. In demesne, two teams. And five villans, with eight bordars, have five teams. Thirteen slaves there. And one mill of five shillings. And four acres of meadow. Wood of ten hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth four pounds. And afterwards, one hundred shillings. Now, four pounds. THE LAND OF HAIMO THE SHERIFF. XII. IN THE LATII OF WIWARLET. IN WIT HUNDRED. 55_17 IIaimo, the Sheriff, holds, of the King, one Manor, which, in the time of King Edward, answered for two sulings and a half. And now, for one suling and three yokes. There is the arable land of eight teams. In demesne, five ploughing oxen. And sixteen villans, with fifteen bordars, have ten teams. A Church there. And seven slaves. And one mill of nine shillings, and sixty eels. Twenty acres of meadow there. And Wood of thirty hogs. In the time of King Edward, it was worth ten pounds. And afterwards, seven pounds. Now, fourteen pounds, and six shillings, and six pence. Of that Manor, Hugh de Montfort holds three yokes and a half. They are worth sixty shillings. IN THE HALF LATH OF SUDTONE. IN GRENVIZ HUNDRED. 55_2o ITaimo has there sixty-three acres of land which pertain to Hulviz. William, the falconer, held it of King Edward. There are eleven bordars there, rendering forty-one pence. The whole is worth three pounds. IN THE LATH OF ELESFORD. IN LITEFEL HUNDRED. 55-30 The same Haimo holds Marourde. Norman held it of King Edward. And then, and now, it answers for two sulings. There is the arable land of nine teams. In demesne, there are two. And twenty-eight villans, with fifteen bordars, have ten teams. A Church there. And ten slaves. And two mills of ten shillings. And two fisheries of two shillings. Twenty acres of meadow there. And as much wood as produces a rent of sixty hogs from pannage. In the time of King Edward, it was worth twelve pounds. And afterwards, ten pounds. Now, nineteen pounds. IN THE LATH OF BOROWART. IN WITESTAPLE HUNDRED. 55-37 The same Haimo holds Blehem. Norman held it of King Edward. And then, and now, it answers for one suling. There is the arable land of four teams. And twelve villans have there two teams. In demesne, there is one team. And two acres of meadow. And, from pannage, sixty hogs. One fishery there. In the time of King Edward, it was worth eight pounds. And afterwards, and now, it is worth six pounds. KENT. 147 THE LAND OF ALBERT THE CHAPLAIN. IN THE HALF LATH OF MILDETONE. IN MILDETONE HUNDRED. Albert, the Chaplain, holds of the King, NEWETONE. Sidgar held it of Queen Eddid. And then, and now, it answers for seven sulings and a half. There is the arable land of . The arable land which was in demesne, is at farm for sixty shillings. In the same Manor, ten villans, with forty-eight bordars, have five teams. Twelve acres of meadow there. And four denns of wood, rendering thirty hogs from pannage. One fishery there serving the hall. And two slaves. A small wood for fencing. To this Manor, there pertain, in the City of Canterbury, four haughs. And two in Rochester, which rendered sixty-four pence. And, from the Manor of Mildentone is rendered in NEUUETONE, one custom, that is, twenty-eight weys of cheese. And from twenty-eight sulings of MILDENTONE, there pertain, in NEUUETONE, ten pounds and ten shillings. And, from another part, from nine sulings of Meddeltone, there pertain, in Neutone, twenty-eight weys and a half of cheese, and fifty-eight shillings of gafol from these nine sulings. And, from these nine sulings, Sigar rendered average at MILDETONE. Of this Manor, there are, away from it, four denns, which were there, in the time of King Edward, as the Hundred testifies. The whole Manor, in the time of King Edward, was worth forty pounds. And afterwards, thirty-six pounds. Now, thirty-four pounds. The Archbishop has, from it, six pounds. And the Bishop of Baieux has three denns. They are worth forty shillings. Of the land of this Manor, Goisfrid (de Hos) holds one yoke. And it is worth ten shillings. Adam Son of Hubert as much wood as produces a rent of forty pence a year. XIII. 56-3 56-n 56-13 56-14 56-is 56-19 56-21 56-23 56-24 NOTE S. p.) Extension, p. 2,1. 1,— “ Douere.” Translation, p. 93,1. 1,— “Douere.” Our first note may well be employed in drawing attention to tbe fact, that Dover {Douere) is one of those few towns which retain their British name unchanged. The little river, the Dour, which rises at Ewell, and, after a short course, enters the sea here, gives its name to the port, and that name is a genuine British one. Dur, Duvr, Dyvr, in the language of the Ancient Britons, signified water. The Portus Dubris of Antoninus, is nothing more than Duvr Latinized, i. e. the port of Duvr, or The Water Port. Baxter, in his Glossary, derives Dubris from the British Duvr-isc, a ivater- course; but Diir or Duvr is our precise name, and we need not trouble ourselves with any fanciful origin of the Latin termination. Without any violent stretch of the imagination, let us see before us, in those primaaval days. Ere “ Home’s imperial eagle, borne on bigh, Had spread her pinions in our northern sky,” —let us see before us, in that deep valley among the chalk-hills, a little sparkling stream, as it approaches the sea, widening into a little natural harbour, sufficient to shelter the boats of those whose huts dotted its banks, or clustered into stockaded villages on the heights above it. "The Stream,-” “The Water,” sufficient name for themselves in speaking of the river of their homes and its haven. It was left for the invader, whose experienced eye early caught at the importance of the spot in a military point of view, to widen this little prirmeval natural port into a haven for war-boats, to crown the heights which overhung it, with fortifications, and then to dignify that which was formerly known as “ Our Stream ” with the grander title of “ Portus Dubris.” (20 Extension, p. 2, 1. 1,— “ Tempore Regis Edwardi.” Translation, p. 93, 1. 1,— “In the time of King Edward.” These words, “ In the time of King Edward, 5 ' (for which, in the original, we have, all through the Survey, the form T.R.E., i.e. “ Tempore Regis Edwardi, 55 ) require a passing notice. It was the Conqueror’s policy, from the first, to make his appearance in this country as the rightful successor of Edward the Confessor, ignoring any interregnum, or the possession of the Crown by any individual but himself since the death of Edward. He comes to England to enter upon his inheritance, and in the Domesday Survey his object of inquiry, in the first instance, was the state of property, its ownership, and taxation, in the time of his predecessor. These details are always carefully recorded, as though he wished it to be particularly marked, that he desired no needless change in the con¬ tents of the manors, or in their taxation. “ They were thus in the time of my predecessor •” they are subjected to no new taxation beyond such as their improved value might justly expect. All is dated from Tempore Regis Edwardi. And here I cannot resist quoting the lucid and admirably expressed remarks of Sir Francis Palgrave on this view of the Conqueror’s policy:— “ Whatever aspects William’s policy assumed, he never departed from T. E. the principle, that he had placed himself in the position of a legitimate sovereign asserting legitimate rights. William did not present himself as a barbarian stranger, a Swetne or a Canute, wielding his battle-axe, slaying old and young, thirsting for blood, greedy of gold, seeking rapine, pursuing revenge; but as a lawful claimant, contesting the inheritance withheld by an unjust adversary; and it is hardly possible to deny but that, on constitutional grounds, he had a better title than he who was van¬ quished by the battle-trial at Hastings. When therefore William, as such lawful claimant, obtained the dominion, the reign of the usurper was blotted out from the legal and constitutional annals of England. In the same manner as the ordinances of the Commonwealth have no place in our Statute-Books, and the Patents of the Protector are expunged from our Records, so was the reign of Harold passed over, and never recog¬ nized by the law. Even as King de facto he was not acknowledged. “ Domesday, which was to establish the territorial rights of the Con¬ queror, the record by which he was willing to be concluded,—that great memorial, not of an arbitrary power, but of the principle of establishing the rights of the Crown, so far as property was concerned, by an immut¬ able law,—always dates them ‘ Tempore Regis Edwardi.'' William wanted nothing more than what King Edward had. He would take nothing as from Harold. He ascended the throne not as the victor of the son of Godwin, but as succeeding the Confessor. Therefore he was to be bound to the responsibility of the monarch of whom he claimed to be the adopted son, the constituted heir.” (Palgrave, 1 Normandy aud England,’ vol. iii. p. 622, s. 15.) The Rubric prefixed to the Laws of Edward the Confessor (see Thorpe, vol. i. p. 442) testifies to the anxious care of William, that these laws should continue in force and unchanged. It is as fol¬ lows :— “ Post quartum annum adquisicionis Regis Willelmi istius terre, sci¬ licet anglie, consilio baronum suorum, fecit summoniri per universos patrie comitatus, anglos nobiles, sapientes, et in lege sua eruditos, ut eorum con- suetudines ab ipsis audiret. Electis, igitur, de singulis tocius patrie comi- tatibus, xii, jurejurando in primis sauxerunt, ut quoad possent, recto tramite ineedentes, legum suarum ac consuetudinum sancita edicerent, nil preter- mittentes, nil addentes, nil prevaricando mutantes.” I. e., loosely rendered:— “After the fourth year of William’s acquisition ofEngland, by the advice of his barons, he caused the nobles and wise men of England, and those who were learned in their laws, to be summoned from all the counties of the land, that he might hear from their own lips what their customs were. Twelve, therefore, being elected from each of the counties of the land, they, in the first instance, bound themselves by the sanction of an oath, that, in a straightforward course, they would declare the established ordinances of their laws and customs, omitting nothing, adding nothing; without pre¬ varication, changiug nothing.” And, again, it is enacted, among the Conqueror’s own laws, ch. lxiii., as given by Wilkins (or, according to Thorpe, ‘ Carta Regis Willelmi Conquestoris de Quibusdam Statutis, 5 vol. iii. cb. xiii.)— “Hoc quoque precipimus, ut omnes habeant et teneant leges Edwardi Regis, j u omnibus rebus, adauctis his quas constituimus ad utilitatem an- glorum.” I. e., “ This also is our precept, that all hold and keep the laws of King Edward in all things, with those additions which we have established for the benefit of the English.” 150 NOTES. E. He thus left the laws of England as he found them, making no changes but such as the great and wise of England themselves de¬ sired. The “ technical principle of his government ” was “ to support his own authority, by respecting the law of Edward the Con¬ fessor,” whose lawful successor he claimed to be. In fact, to use Sir Francis Palgrave’s own words (‘ Normandy and England,’ vol. iii. p. 620, s. 14), “ Every prescriptive right was to be held as it had been in the days of the Confessor. The laws of Edward the Confessor were to be observed in all respects, except so far as he had caused them to be amended, for the benefit of the English people, and, at first sight, there was no intentional innovation, or no change.” (See Appendix , I.) We are here speaking solely of William’s policy with regard to the Laws. He had succeeded to the Crown of England, and, with it, to the duty of maintaining the Laws of the Kingdom unchanged. With regal'd to property, it was another question. After such a convulsion as was forced upon him by the Saxon Chiefs who refused to acknowledge his authority, a vast amount of Manors and Lands were necessarily left at his disposal, and, as a natural consequence, he largely endowed his Norman followers with those which had been previously held by those Saxon Lords who had been in arms against him, and who, by the existing institutions of the country, were treated as rebels against their lawful King, thus forfeiting their estates to the Crown, and causing an almost universal change in the ownership of the Manors. Not that I would be supposed as attempting, for one moment, to gloss over the fact that William was, to all intents and purposes, an usurper. He certainly had as good a claim to the Crown as Harold had; but still was usurping it to the prejudice of the rightful heir. It is his wisdom and policy that I am justifying, not his glaring usurpation. And yet, while we condemu his usurpation, we cannot close our eyes to the boundless benefits of which that usurpation laid the foundation. “ William,” says Sir F. Palgrave, “ was not a wild, a cruel, or a bloodthirsty conqueror, with but a small share of moral principle; he had no love for evil or sin, as such.. Historical parallels, though frequently very delusive from the efforts made to overstrain the resemblance or the antithesis of the respective characters, do, nevertheless, afford much help to the student; and, excepting in the violence of his temper, which, however, he could well restrain when it was his interest so to do, I should say that there was as near a resemblance between him and his third namesake as could well exist between two different individuals placed so widely apart. It is, I believe, the popular opinion, as expressed by the words of Hume, that it would be difficult to find any revolution more destruc¬ tive, or attended with a more complete subjugation of the ancient inhabitants. Unquestionably the cup of bitterness was presented to the English, but it was not deep ; and, amongst the many provi¬ dences which so singularly and specially mark the destiny of the English Nation, it is impossible to doubt but that the effect of the Conquest was, in every respect, to increase its powers of good, to strengthen the national intellect, and also, if they be blessings, to give the greatest impulse to its worldly prosperity and glory.” Normandy and England,’ vol. iii. p. 621, s. 14.) ( 3 .) Extension, p. 2, 1. 2 ,—“ Reddebat.” Translation, p. 93, 1. 1,— “Rendered.” It may be well here to cite a few passages from Madox as to the render issuing from towns, and the parties to whom such render was payable. They will supply a useful illustration of the passage before us, and will be valuable for reference, when we come to the descrip¬ tion of Canterbury and other towns in the Survey. (i.) First, as to the issues from which the render was supplied:— “ Tlie yearly Ferine of Towns arose out of certain locate, or demised things that yielded issues or profits; insomuch, that when a Town was committed to a Sheriff, Fermer, or Gustos, such Former or Gustos well knew how to raise the Ferme out of the ordinary Issues of the Town, with an overplus of profit to himself.” These issues consisted of divers things, according to the situation or productions of each particular Town,—such as Housegavel,— Amends for breaking Assize of Bread and Beer,—Fisheries,—Profits of Mills,—Assised Rents,—Pleas and Perquisites of Courts,—Cus¬ tom of Goods,—Fairs,—Markets,—Stallage,—Aldermanries,—Tolls, Firma W harfage, etc. etc. (See Madox, ‘Firma Burgi,’ p. 251, and the Bcugj. numerous cases cited by him from the Plea and Pipe-Rolls, Memo¬ randa, etc., in which all these sources of Issues occur.) (ii.) Next, as to the parties who owned the render . “ All towns in ancient times were vested either in the Crown, or else in the clergy, or great men of the layety-: that is to say, the King was immediate Lord of some towns, and particular persons, either of the clergy or layety, were immediate Lords of other towns. “ Of the cities, towns, and burghs which the King had, some were vested in him by one title, others by another title. “ Of some he was possessed, antiguo jure Gorone, that is, as part of the original inheritance of his Crown. Of others, by ancient Escheat. The former were called ancient demeans, Antiquum Dominicum Regis, or Corona, to distinguish them from ancient Escheats. “ These Escheats may have occurred from various causes, such as Want of Heirs,—by Attainder,—Forfeiture,—Feoffment,—Exchange,—Dissolu¬ tion of Religious Houses, etc. etc.” “When the King was seized of a city or town in demesne it was commonly called Givitas Regis, —or Villa, Regis, —or Burgum Regis, i. e. the King’s City,—Town,—or Burgh, as the case might be. (Madox, ‘Firma Burgi,’ pp. 4, 15.) (iii.) Those towns which were in the hands of the King were usually let by him to the townsmen to ferm, either for a Term of Years or at Fee-Ferm, i.e. in perpetuity, at a specified Ferme or Rent; and this last was called Burgage Tenure. “ The Ferine was answered to the Crown, either by the Sheriff of the county wherein the towns lay, as included in the Corpus Comitatus, or euperadded to it, or else by the townsmen themselves, per manum suam, either by the name of Homines, or Cives, or Burgenses of such a town, burgh, or villate, or under the name of the Provost ( Praposiius ) or other particular Custos or Fermer.” (Madox, ‘History of the Exchequer,’ p. 226.) (iv.) “Sometimes the Crown thought fit to grant some part of a city or town, or some profit or appurtenant thereof, to a private Man, or to a Religious House; by which means it sometimes came to pass that the property- of a city or town was divided into a half, a third, or other part or parts; or, perhaps, certain of the profits or appurtenants of the city or town became severed from the Corpus Civitalis.” (Madox, ‘Firma Burgi,’ p. 14.) (v.) Although involving much repetition, I will add one extract more from the works of Madox, but little different, perhaps, from No. iii.; yet serviceable to complete the elucidation of the subject before us. “ The yearly profits which the King made of his cities, towns, or burghs were commonly raised and paid to him in a sundry manner. For example, the Issues of some of them were included in the General Ferm rendered for the county wherein they lay; and then, the Ferm or Issues of them were answered to the King by the Sheriff of the same county. “ Sometimes the Sheriff of the County held a town, as Custos or Fermer of it, and answered to the King for the Issues or Ferm of it, apart from the Ferme of the County. “ Sometimes the King committed his town to a Fermer, Custos, or Ap¬ prover, distinct from the Sheriff of the county. “ lu brief, the King was sometimes pleased to demise or let his town to the townsmen thereof at Ferm; that is to say, either in Fee-farm or at Ferm for years.” (Madox, ‘ Firma Burgi,’ p. 18.) Dover, evidently, was not one of those thus let to Ferm to the Townsmen; for, in the time of the Confessor, we have the King’s Reeve ( Prepositus Regis) there, superintending the peace of the Town (see p. 2, 1. 15 “Extension,” and p. 93, 1. 9, “Translation”). Again, in the very next paragraph (“Extension,” p. 2, 1. 17, “Translation,” p. 93, 1. 10), we have “Whoever resided constantly in the Town, and rendered custom to the King,” —almost deciding the question. And, a little lower down, in Odo’s time, we have the Reve ( Prepositus ) apportioning the Render between the King and the Earl (Odo). This Prepositus, therefore, must have been the King’s officer, and, though not here specifically styled Prepositus Regis, must have held that office, indicating thereby, that, “when the Bishop of Baieux received ” the Town, it was only as “ Custos,” the demesne being still in the King. Then, again, we have such expressions as these—“The King’s Water,” “The King has lost NOTES. 151 Firm*. Bubgi. Dknarios Tertius. Tiielonecm the Custom/ 5 “ Damage done to the King’s Men /’ all evidencing that Dover was then of the King’s Demesne. We need not here enter into the question, whether the King had, or not, as yet, separated the towns constituting the Five Ports from their respective counties, and thus placed them exclusively under his own jurisdiction, as represented by his Lord Warden. From the re¬ cital of the Confirmation Charter, granted 6 Ed. I., it would appear almost certain that it was so, for in that charter, the words “ quieti a Shins et Hundredis i. e. quit of Shires and Hundreds, appear among the franchises confirmed, and Edward the Confessor is enume¬ rated among the Grantors of the charters which Edward I. confirms. We must, however, confine ourselves to the account of Dover, as we find it in the passage of Domesday before us. It certainly is not enumerated among the possessions designated as “ Terra Regis,” i. e. as of ancient demesne ; and yet it would seem to have been always specially of the demesne of the Crown. The first three pages of the Survey are devoted exclusively to Dover and to Canterbury, the an¬ cient capital of the Saxon Kings, and to a slight notice of Rochester. These two cities, and the town of Dover, seem to be separated by the Commissioners from the Corpus Oomitatus. They are not described in the body of the Survey. Indeed, it is only after the minute details of these, that the Survey of the County, headed, according to the usual course of the Record, by a list of the Tenants in Chief, begins. In fact, the exclusiveness so specially given to Dover and Canter¬ bury, seem to mark them as of the King’s special demesne; of course, always excepting franchises and alienations made by the Crown. And the descriptions of the two in the Survey confirm this view. If I am correct in these conclusions, Dover, from the time of the Confessor, was always vested in the King; Godwin, and, after him, Odo, being, each in turn, Custos of the Town and Castle. (See Ap¬ pendix II.) Of its franchises, and the portions of its render alien¬ ated by the Crown, we shall treat in subsequent annotations. (See Notes 4, 16, 17, 26, infra.) (*■) Extension, p. 2,1. 4,— “ Comes Godwinus tei’ciam.” Translation, p. 93,1. 2,— “Earl Godwin the Third.” Of the Fines and Profits of the County Courts (i. e. The Pla- cita et Perquisita Curiarum—The Pleas and Perquisites of Courts), two parts were l’eserved to the King, and a third part to the Earl [Comes) of the County ( comitatus ). This was called the “Third Penny” ( Denarius tertius Comitatus), and the Earl (Comes) either received it from his Deputy (Vice-Comes), the Sheriff, in specie, at the assizes and trials, or had an equivalent composition for it out of the Exchecquer. (See Jacob and Appendix III.) Godwin having been Earl of Kent, in the time of the Confessor, it might, at first sight, be supposed that the third part of the render of Dover, thus apportioned to him, was his, jure suo, as the Earl of the County; but it must be remembered, that the Survey is here treating of the Render of Dover, not the Pleas and Perquisites of its Courts, to which last source alone, and not to the Render of a Town the third Penny applied. It is more probable, that, in accordance with the practice men¬ tioned in Note 3 (iv.), the Crown had made a grant of this third part to Godwin, as Custos of the Castle; and it appears afterwards to have been transferred to Odo, who was the first Earl after the Con¬ quest. They, each of them held it then, not jure suo, as Earl of the County, and thus owner of the “ Third Penny,” but by virtue of a grant from the Crown. It will subsequently appear that Odo’s grant had been forfeited before the enrolment of the survey. (See Note 26, infra.) The title of Ealdorman, which was formerly given to the Governor, or Chief of a County was, in these later times, superseded by that of Comes, or Earl, and was, in the time of the Confessor, held by God¬ win. A few remarks on this change of title, and the nature of his rank and office, will be found in the Appendix. (See Appendix III.) (5.) Extension, p. 2,1. 4,—“ Contra hoc.” Translation, p. 93, 1. 2,—“ On the contrary.” This extraordinary expression necessarily leads to much discussion. To a casual observer, it might, at first sight, appear, that “ contra hoc ” was merely the representation of the modern form “per contra,” Thkloneom i. e. “as an offset to this receipt, they had to pay the Canons of St. DE Dover. Martin a moiety.” But the Canons neither had, nor claimed, a a moiety of the Render of Dover. Their claim was for half the Toll of the Port, i. e. a moiety of a portion of the sum divided between the King and Godwin. The expression is “ aliam medietatem”—a moiety of some other render than that here named. The words “contra hoc ” seem rather to imply a disputed claim, and I believe that, in strict correctness, it ought to be rendered, “ In contradic¬ tion to this statement,” or, paraphrastically, “ This statement is not strictly correct, because it appears that a moiety of one of the issues of the town belonged to the Canons of St. Martin.” In cases of adverse claims advanced by any party, the usual form of recording such in the Survey, is “ Canonici calumniantur,” “ Modo est in calumpnia,” etc.; but here, after accounting for the apparent entirety of the issues, viz. two-thirds as belonging to the Kong, and one-third to Earl Godwin,—it is positively asserted, “ The Canons of St. Martin had another moiety.” If I may be permitted a con¬ jecture on this singular entry, I would suggest, that from whatever sources the Commissioners collected their evidences, whether from the Doni-boc of the Castle or Town, or from oral testimony, it had been proved to them, that, in the time of the Confessor, the King had two-thirds of the issues of Dover, and Earl Godwin, one-third, no notice being, at the time, taken that of the issues thus apportioned, a certain part had, in former times, been alienated to the Canons of St. Martin, and that, subsequently, before the actual enrolment of their returns, these Canons had produced evidence that their house had formerly been in the possession of a moiety of one of the issues of the Port. The information, perhaps, was not, at the moment, suffi¬ ciently detailed for them to reconstruct the paragraph relating to this apportionment, they deferred this, therefore, awhile, and, in the in¬ terim, merely made a note of it in the margin of their return; some-, thing, perhaps, to this effect:—“ This is wrong; on the contrary, the Canons of St. Martin had another moiety.” On enrolment, the gloss crept from the margin into the text, and, by inadvertence, no attempt was made at any adaptation of the new paragraph to the one to which it was now incoherently attached. Be this as it may, it is of prime importance that the true history of this moiety be clearly ascertained, because, upon it, the correct¬ ness of the date usually assigned to the completion of the Survey will very much depend. In a MS. Chronicle of the Priory of St. Martin (Cotton: Vespa¬ sian, B. xi. f. 73), it is recorded, that Wihtred, King of Kent, cir- citer a.d. 696, removed the Canons from the Castle to the Town, where he founded a new Priory for them, endowing them with half the Toll of the Port, in addition to the Prebends and Franchises which they had hitherto possessed. (See Appendix IV.) On the other hand, among the National Records ( Treasury of Receipt of the Exchequer, Miscellanea, Jtj) is an Exemplification of a Plea de Quo Waranto, 30 June, 34 Ed. I. (a.d. 1306), in which it is certified, that it was King Henry I. who endowed the Priory with this Half Toll; and that his Charter of Endowment had been car¬ ried away, a few years previously, by the French, in a piratical at¬ tack on the town, when they burnt the Priory. (See Appendix IV.) Now, if King Henry I. was the first Grantor of this Half Toll, the paragraph under discussion, as well as that wherein the Toll of Dover is enumerated among the Possessions of the Priory (Exten¬ sion, p. 7,1. 21; Translation, p. 97, 1. 16), must have been inserted subsequently to the year 1100, that being the first year of his reign; and, in that case, the date usually assigned to the completion of the Survey, viz. 1086, must be erroneous, unless we resort to the very improbable supposition, that the enrolment of the Survey was not made till at least fourteen years after its completion,—that the Commissioners’ returns were subjected to alterations, and that the Scribe antedated the completion of the work, when, on finishing it, he subjoined the following colophon :— “ Anno milleBimo octogesimo sexto ab Incarnatione Domini, vigesimo quinto Regui Willelmi, facta est ista descriptio. Non solum per bos tres comitatus sed etiam per alios.” The Tres Comitatus being those contained in the Second Volume, viz. Essex, Norfolk, and Suffolk. It would be a short and easy method of dealing away all the difficulties that are involved in the 152 NOTES. necessary that they should obtain a Charter of Confirmation from Theloneum Henry I. The following passage from Ordericus Yitalis will remove DE Doveb - any difficulty we may have in assenting to the possibility of Odo’s connivance at a continued spoliation:— “ Quid loquar de Odone, Baiocesiuo Prsesule, qui Consul Palatinus erat et ubique cunetis Anglia; habitatoribus formidabilis erat, ac, veluti secundus Res, passim jura dabat ? Principatum super omnes Coraites liabuit et cam thesauris anti quorum Cantiam possedit .Ccenobia Sanctorum valde conqueruntur, quod multa eis Ono detrimenta fecerit, et fundos sibi antiquitus datos a fidelibus Anglis, violenter et injuste abstulerit.” I. e., “ What shall I say of Odo, Bishop of Baieus, who was Earl Palatine, and generally dreaded by the English people, issuing his orders everywhere like a second King ? He had the command over all the earls and barons of the realm, and, with the treasures collected from ancient times, was in pos¬ session of Kent .The Monasteries of the Saints made great complaints of the injuries they received at the hands of Ono, who with violence and injustice robbed them of the estates with which the English had piously endowed them in ancient times.” (Book iv., ch. 7.) Odo, then, had both the power and the will for the work. Whe¬ ther or no he had exercised them in this case, must be matter of conjecture; but there is amply sufficient evidence for grave suspicion. The fact, however, that the Priory possessed this moiety, the Commissioners do not hesitate to record, not only in that singular paragraph which has led to these discussions, but also, by-and-by, in the enumeration of the Possessions of the Priory of S l Martin, they record— singular entry which we are discussing, if we could persuade our¬ selves that we havo hitherto been in error as to the date of the Sur¬ vey, and that it was not really completed till after the grant of this Half Toll to the Priory by Henry I. Assuredly, at first sight, such a conclusion seems to follow as a matter of course; and, in that case, the gloss “ contra hoc,” etc., is a natural and almost necessary entry; but we must not permit ourselves to dismiss too hastily opinions that have been long received, and that rest on the highest authority. A much more probable conjecture is this, viz. that the grant of Henry I. was a Charter of Confirmation to the Priory of the old grant made by Wihtred. Henry was, at the time, conferring various endowments upon them, and it was in the ordinary course that he should begin with a confirmation of Wihtred’s grant, to which they could probably, at that time, produce no other right than that of prescription. It has been objected to me, that, if the endowment was conferred by Wihtred, the original grant might readily have been produced before the Commissioners, or that, at least, it would have been found recorded in the Dombocs of the Castle or Town, from which books probably, to a certain extent, they compiled their returns; or, at all events, if the Priory were in actual receipt of this moiety at the time of the Survey, the oral evidence to this fact must have been such, that these Commissioners could not have avoided giving a more correct and clear assignment of the different portions of the render of Dover, than that which appears in this paragraph of their Record. The form of the entry, it is objected, is vague, and hesitatingly made, indicating that they were hardly satisfied with the evidence before them, whether oral or documentary, and that Wihtred’s grant must still remain an unsolved problem; yet, methinks, the state of England during the fifty years immediately preceding the Conquest (nay, we might almost say, for more than a century before that event), might well account for the loss of legal rights, and the absence of legal records. “ The sword and the torch, plague, pes¬ tilence, and famine, are very effectual checks” to the rightful pre¬ servation of property. We have only to turn to the Conqueror’s Survey, as printed in these pages, to satisfy ourselves of the count¬ less violations of rights that had been long practised with impunity, and of the disorganized state in which England had long lain,—that “ Lawless force was there.” To say nothing of the hopeless turmoil and confusion, and almost chaotic ruin that must have been caused, again and again, to private property, specially to that of religious houses, during the period when England’s cradle— “ Was rocked by many a rough Norwegian blast. And Danish bowlings scared her as they passed.” And then came the Conqueror’s invasion to complete the chaos. Albeit, his was the hand that, by the masterly stroke of policy in¬ dicated in this Survey, first attempted to restore order, and right, and justice. We need not, then, be staggered at the absence of any recorded evidence of Wihtred’s grant to the Priory. It might have been lost, or the subject of spoliation for many years, the memory of it only existing in the traditions of the Canons themselves. It was little likely that Godwin, in his time, would have made any volun¬ tary effort to restore to them a mere traditional right, by a reduc¬ tion of his own third, and his successor, Odo, was still less likely to make such a sacrifice. The very form in which the entry appears is, I repeat, indicative that, after this part of the Survey was made, the Canons persuaded the Commissioners that they had a right to a moiety of one of the issues of Dover, and caused them to note it iu the vague form in which it appears. In that case, the grant of Henry I. was merely a restoration of their former rights, though drawn up in the form of an original endowment. On this last sup¬ position alone can we avoid interference with the generally received date of the Domesday Survey. I cannot divest myself of a strong impression, that, whatever may have been the case in the time of the Confessor, the Priory, since the arrival of the Conqueror, for a certain portion of that time, had been deprived of this portion of their revenues: nay, the evi¬ dences of their claim to it may have been suppressed by the King’s officials, or by Odo himself; and they endeavoured to secure a re¬ establishment of their rights, by having it recorded in the Survey, that they had formerly been in receipt of this Half Toll. Indeed, it was this suspension of their just rights which made it the more I “ Theloneum de Doure, T.R.E., valebat viij libras, modo xxij libras ” ( Extension , p. 7,1. 21). I. e., “ The Thol of Doure, in the time of King Edward, was worth eight pounds; now, twenty-two pounds.” ( Translation , p. 97,1. 16.) “ The Toll,” i. e. that portion of it which belonged to the Priory of St. Martin. We might almost fancy, that, in the act of recording this entry; from evidence produced before them by the Priory, the Commis¬ sioners, remembering their note of the apportionment between the King and Godwin, which would therefore now require correction, turned back to it, and jotted down in the margin that the Canons had a portion, intending afterwards to introduce it in proper form into the text. This was afterwards overlooked, and now we have their mere marginal note instead of their intended correction. However singular, then, the form of the first paragraph in ques¬ tion may be, and however difficult it be to account for its want of proper connection with the text preceding, still, there it stands, and it is thereby distinctly recorded, that the Canons of St. Martin were the rightful owners of this Half Toll in the time of the Con¬ fessor; and, even supposing, as I have suggested, that their rights had been for awhile in abeyance, yet, in this latter paragraph cited from the enumeration of their possessions, it seems to be recorded that they were also in the receipt of it at the time that the Survey was enrolled. Be it remembered, also, that, ere then, Odo had been banished and deprived of his possessions, and, perhaps, the Priory, thereby, restored to their rights. Some information on the origin and precise nature of their claim was assuredly lacking, or the form in which it is recorded would have necessarily been very different from that in which it now appears. The great length of this discussion will be pardoned, when its im¬ portant bearing on the correct date of the Survey is duly considered. If Henry I. were the original grantor of the Half Toll to the Priory, then the usually assigned date (viz. 1086) is incorrect; but if, as I have conjectured in these discussions, the Charter of Henry I. was a confirmation of a former Royal Charter of Endowment, ren¬ dered more necessary, perhaps, by the conjectured interruption in their receipts, then, the grant of such a Charter furnishes no argu¬ ment against the usually received opinion as to the date of this great National Record. Letters Patent of “ Inspeximus” of former endowments, with Charters of Confirmation of the same, were almost necessarily sought for, and granted, at the commencement of every new Reign, and specially in cases like the present, where the Crown was grant¬ ing additional endowments to those already possessed. In recapitulation,—whatever the words of this Charter of Henry I. may have been, their verification is beyond our reach. It was carried off by the French in their piratical attack on the Priory, t. Ed. I. (see p. 151); and unfortunately, in the recital of it, in the pleadings NOTES. 153 Theloneom de Dover. Quinque PoRTUS. Saca et De Quo Waranto (see Appendix IY.) the Priory plead it as an origi¬ nal Grant, not as a Charter of Confirmation, which still I have no doubt that it was. That Wihteed was the original Grantor, we have no evidence but that of the Chronicler, cited above; but still, there is the Record of the Commissioners that the Priory were en¬ titled to the Half Toll. Surely we may be satisfied with the evi¬ dence which satisfied them, and, therefore, conclude this long note by expressing a conviction that, notwithstanding the form of the pleadings in the cited Quo Waranto, the grant of the Half Toll had been made to the Priory by Wihteed, and that, if not actually receiving it, in the time of the Confessor, they were, nevertheless, entitled to it,—that, although it may have been temporarily in abeyance, they were in full possession of it ere the Survey was com¬ pleted,—and that we have no sufficient ground to question the re¬ ceived date of that completion. (See Appendix IY.) ( 6 .) Extension, p. 2,1. 6,— “ Burgenses dederwnt xx naves regi.” Translation, p. 93,1. 3,— “ The Burgesses gave the King twenty ships.” Here, then, we have a Record of the origin of the Cinque Ports and their privileges. Dover, it seems, was bound to furnish twenty ships, each with a crew of twenty-one men, for fifteen days, once a year, and, in return for that service, were endowed with the franchise of Saca and Soca. Sandwich, as wo afterwards read, was charged with the same service: “ Reddit simile servitium sicut Dovere i. e. renders to the King the like service as Dovere. (See Extension, p. 10, 1. 7 j Translation, p. 99, 1. 17.) And, although the franchise which it receives in return for the service is not actually specified, we may conclude that it was similar to that of Dover. Again, it is recorded of Romney (Extension, p. 16, 1. 37; and Translation, p. 105,1. 30) : “ Ipsi habent omnes consuetudines, et alias forisfacturas, pro servitio maris,” i. e. they themselves have all the customs and other forfeiture, in return for sea service. "Which, after all, amounts to the franchise of Saca and Soca. (See Appendix Y.) CO- Extension, p. 2,1. 8,—“ Pro eo quod eis perdonaverat sacam et socam.” TYanslation, p. 93, 1. 4,— “In return for his having endowed them with Saca and Soca.” First, as to the expression “ perdonaverat.” It is not used here in the sense of “ pardoned,” but in its primary meaning, “ made a grant; ” per being intensive. The word was commonly used thus in early Royal Charters, “ perdono,”—I entirely give, I f ully grant. It is used in this sense in the Charter of Henry II., relating to the Half Toll of the Port of Dover granted to the Priory of St. Martin; and again in the Charter of King John, both cited in the Appendix; and, each of them, entitled, “ Carta de nemini perdono/' 1 (See Appendix III.) Next, as to the Franchise of Saca et Soca. The privilege of holding their own Courts, and of administering justice therein, between their own tenants, and of levying fines, and of executing the law upon their offences, was frequently granted by the Crown to Lords of Manors, and thus the tenants of these ma¬ nors were within the jurisdiction of the Courts of their own Lord; and the same privilege was often granted to towns which were thus severed from the Corpus Comitatus, and had their own exclusive jurisdiction, instead of being subjected to that of the Sheriff, or of the Hundred or Tithing Courts. A Charter of Saca and Soca would imply a grant of the privilege of holding Pleas within the precincts of the specified Manor or Town, as the case might be. The word Saca signifying, in its primary sense, a plea or suit, and thence the privilege of holding pleas; and Soca, the Sole, or .territory wherein this privilege was exercised. (See Appendix V.) The precise powers and franchises of Privileged Courts were, of necessity, specifically set out in the Charters conferring them, by the introduction of the words “ Saca et Soca,” “ Tol et Team/ 5 “ Infangenethef,” et ea ratione “ Fureas,” etc. etc., “ ut sint quiete Saca et de Shiris de Hundredis,” etc. etc.; and, of course, the parties to Soca. whom the Charters were granted could claim no franchises or powers, but such as were named specifically therein, as we find it again and again evidenced in the “ Placita de Quo Waranto.” Thus, in the case of Henry, Earl of Lancaster, 3 Edw. III., con¬ cerning his franchises in the villes of Bothenushall, etc., in Notting¬ hamshire, we have it among the pleadings thus :— “ William de Dene, who sues for the King, says, that all Royal “ Liberties are merely the right of the Crown, which by no means “ can, or ought to be, lessened from the Crown, or alienated to any “ one, unless by certain words which make express mention of the “ grant of these liberties. 55 On the Pipe Rolls we have frequent entries of fines paid by parties ut haberent Socam et Saca/m in terra sua. Did our limits permit it, wo would gladly enter more fully into the nature of these Charters, and the specific powers granted by them, very frequently including that of life and death. At present, we are only concerned with the text before us, viz. the Charter of Saca and Soca granted to the Bxirgesses of Dover ; and this, by itself, would be the power of holding Courts for de¬ termining disputes, taking cognizance of assaults, trespasses, etc., and all offences other than capital felonies, levying fines and for¬ feitures, and administering justice to all residing within the liberties, —the Soca of the Town,—the same privileges as were enjoyed by Lords of Manors in their Courts. We know, indeed, that the Franchises of Dover, in common with those of the other Cinque Ports, included the power of life and death; but of these powers it is beside our purpose to treat in this Note. (See Appendix YI.) ( 8 .) Extension, p. 2, 1. 14,— “ Treitua Regis.” Translation, p. 93,—“ The King’s Peace.” I. e. There was immunity from arrest for debt, and from civil ac- Trkdva tion of any kind, to all, from whatever part of the kingdom they ^ KGIS ' might have come. A truce was granted to them. They were under the King’s protection, and none might touch or molest them. (9.) Extension, p. 2, 1. 15,— “Inde.” Translation, p. 93, 1. 9,— “Thereupon.” For that cause, — On that occasion, — Thereupon. It might, perhaps, Inde. be rendered Thence, i. e. From the Town ; but the position of Inde in the sentence would rather point to the rendering which I have adopted. Here, and in nearly all the subsequent occuiTences of the word, Thereupon, i. e. for that cause, seems to be the proper trans¬ lation. In modem records and pleadings we find whereupon taking the place of the unde of ancient pleadings, c. g. in ancient Feet of Fines we have the formulary— Unde placitum ConvenUonis ; but, in more modern usage, when in our Law Courts English was substituted for Latin, we have it ivherevpon a Plea of Covena/nt. On the same prin¬ ciple, thereupon seems to be the proper representative of Inde in this place. Still, I am far from positively determining it to be so. In line 23, without controversy, “inde 55 should be rendered “there- ft-om,” “ from it, 55 i. e. from the Town. ( 10 .) Extension, p. 2, 1.15,— “ Preepositvs Regis.” Translation, p. 93, 1. 9,—“ The King’s lieve.” “ Praspositus,” i. e. Provost, Reve, Port-Reve, Town-Revc, Mayor, Piuepositi or other Head-Officer of a Hundred, or Town, or Lord’s Manor. The rendering in English would vary according to the commu¬ nity, or property, or district under his charge. Corresponding to it, in Anglo-Saxon, we have the official called “Gerefa,” who is sim¬ ply Gerefa, i. e. Reve, or else Scirgerefa, Portgerefa, Tungerefa or, Wicgerefa, etc., according to the subject of his charge. I have adopted Reve, as the most generic term. In the Survey, except in one single instance, “ Prapositus ” always represents the 154 NOTES. Phspositus. King’s Officer, viz. as his Portgerefa or Governor in his Town of Dover and Cities of Canterbury and London, or as his Tungerefa or Chief Officer in his ancient Demesne Manors of Dartford and Milton. The only other occurrence of the term Prcepositus is as the Archbishop’s Revo of the Manor of Newenden. (See Appendix VII.) (ii.) Extension, p. 2, 1. 16,— “ Oommwnem emendationem.” Translation, p. 93,1. 9,— “A common emend.” Emenda. “ Emendatio.” An amend, or satisfaction. Emendam facere is a common term in manorial and other Courts for paying a fine, i. e. the final satisfaction, compensation, or amends, for default, trespass, or other offence; and in this sense emenda, emendatio, emendabit, etc., seems generally to be used in the Survey. Wilkins (see Leges Anglo-Saxonicce, Glossary) and Spelman agree in distinguishing between a mulct, a bare penalty, and an emend, an indemnification. Mulcta jud/ici; emenda, autem, parti Icesce datum, i. e. a mulct is given to the judge, but an emend to the injured party or accuser. I doubt, however, whether this distinction is always strictly ob¬ served in the Survey. In the case before us, we need not pause to inquire whether the emendatio was in the nature of a fine to be paid to the King, or as an amends to the party more immediately injured. The destination of the emend is not recorded. Indeed, in a certain sense, if the law were broken, the King himself would be the injured party, the offence being an outrage on his peace—on his protection—trusting ' to which the parties would have come into the town. Be this as it may, the emend was, in this case, to be made by the whole commonalty. The King, in granting his “ peace ” to the town, during those two months, converted it, for that time, into a sanctuary. To make this sanctuary more sure, all the Burgesses were responsible for its strict observance; no individual could break it, without involving every other member of the community in the consequent penalty. The King’s Reve was to levy “ a common emend,”—to fine the entire commonalty for the offence. No private interest or spite, therefore, was likely to cause a breach of the peace, and “ the King’s peace ” was secure. It was an old principle of Saxon polity, as evinced in the PriSborg, or frankpledge system, by which the mem¬ bers of tho Titliings were mutual securities, each for the other. (See Appendix VIII.) Even to this hour, in cases of riot, the entire Hun¬ dred is liable for the damages caused thereby ; and also for losses by highway robberies. It has to pay communem emendam, a com¬ mon emend. ( 12 .) Extension, p. 2,1. 7,— “ Reddebat Regi consuetudincm Translation, p. 93,1.10,— “Rendered custom to the King.” Consue- Oonsuetudo, customary rent or service, i. e. the service of rent in tudo. money, or in some produce, or the render of personal service, as the case might be. At page 150, note 3, supra, are enumerated many of the ordinary payments for which the Burgesses of Towns were liable to the Crown. These would be comprehended in the term “ consuetudo.” To which of these specifically, the Burgesses of Dover were liable, we have no record in the Survey. All that we have there is a note of the ex¬ traordinary services to which they were bound, viz. to find twenty ships with twenty-one men in each, for fifteen days once a year; and to find the pilot and his assistant in the transport of the Kinu-’s messengers, when they might happen to arrive at Dover, and require passage. Any constant resident in the town, who had regularly paid his share of these and other dues to the Crown, was thereby free of toll throughout the whole of England. ( Appendix lift) ( 13 .) Extension, p. 2,1.17,— “Quietus erat de Theloneo per totam Angliam .” Translation, p. 93,1.10,— “Was quit of Thol throughout all England.” Quietus he That is, they might merchandise, buy and sell in any market, fair, town, or city, throughout the realm, without being liable to the cus¬ tomary toll, which others had to pay for their traffic therein. This was a privilege enjoyed by all tenants in ancient demesne. At page 150, supra, are some observations on Dover being of the Demesne of the Crown. This privilege of freedom from toll would, to a certain extent, confirm a conjecture there hazarded, that it was in Ancient demesne; though I will not go so far as to avouch this as positive proof that it was so j at all events, it had, in this respect, the same privilege as other manors and towns that were of Ancient demesne. (See Appendix X.) Quietus de Thelonio. ( 14 .) Extension, p. 2,1. 19 ,—“Qucvndo Willebnus Rex in Angliam venit.” Translation, p. 93,1.11,— “When King William came into England.” This, and the very next paragraph, In ipso primo adventu ejus in In Angliam Angliam, on Ids very first arrival in England, are remarkable ex- VENIT - pressions demanding special notice in passing. Mark, it is not as in the form used in the time of the Edwards, “ post conquestum Anghe,” but simply “ on his arrival in England,” “ when he came to England.” It was, throughout, William’s policy to appear among the English as the lawful successor of the Con¬ fessor. The authority which he assumed was not be called the prize of conquest, but his own legal right; “ Quando venit in An¬ gliam,” i. e. when he came, as it were, to take up his inheritance—to assume the Crown which was his own. (See Note 2, page 149, supra.) ( 13 .) Extension, p. 2,1. 20, —“Fuit ipsa villa combusta.” Translation, p. 93, 1. 12,— “The said town was burnt.” Ordericus Vitalis gives the following account of William’s move- Dover ments after the Battle of Hastings. combusta. “ Suis, autem, prout tunc deeuit, sepultis, Romaneium accessit, et, expugnatis his qui intus erant, cladem suorum vindicavit, quos illuc errore appulsos fera gens adorta pradio fuerat, et, cum maximo utriusque partis detrimento, fuderat. " Deinde Dux contendit Doueram, ubi multus populus congregatus erat pro iuexpuguabili, ut sibi videbatur, munitione; quia id castellum situm est in acutissima rupe mari contigua. “ Castellani, autem, dum obsidentem Ducem metuerent, supplieesque deditionem pararent, Normannoruin armigeri, pro cupidine pried®, ignem iniecerunt, et, voraci flamma leviter volitante, pleraque correpta et com¬ busta sunt. “ Dux, autem, danmo eorum qui sibi subdere se volebant compassus est, preciumque restituendarum tedium dedit, aliaque amissa recompensavit.” (See * Ordcriei Vitalis TIticensis monctchi Eeclesiasticce Histories, liber Hi. apud ‘Duchesne Historic Normmnorum Scriptores Antigui;' Ed. Paris. 1619, p. 502.) I e. “ After providing for the decent interment of the dead, the Duke marched to Romney, and, taking it by assault, revenged the slaughter of a party of his troops, who, having landed there by mistake, were fiercely attacked by the inhabitants, and cruelly butchered, after great loss on both sides. “ The Duke then continued his march to Dover, where there was a large body of people collected, because they thought the position impreg¬ nable, the castle standing on the summit of a steep rock overhanging the sea. The garrison, however, struck with panic at the Duke’s approach, were preparing to surrender, when some Norman squires, greedy for spoil, set the place on fire, and the devouring flames spreading around, many parts were ruined and burnt. “ The Duke, compassionating those who were willing to render him their submission, ordered them to be paid the cost of rebuilding their houses, and their other losses.” (See ‘ The Translation of Ordericus Vitalis,’ by Thomas Forester, A.M., in * Bohn’s Antiquarian Library,’ vol. i. p. 488.) The burning of Dover, thus related, by the historian, who wrote the account little more than half a century after the events which he narrates, is, doubtless, that same destruction which is recorded in the text. ( 16 .) Extension, p. 2,1. 22,— “Quando Episcopus Baiocensis earn recepit." Translation, p. 93,1. 13,— “ When the Bishop of Baieux received it.” Early in tho year following his coronation, viz. in March, 1067, Odo Custos William visits Normandy,—first, however, committing his strong ^°' EB ' forts and castles to the care of his own followers. He left his kinsman, William Fitz-Osbem, in charge of the whole kingdom. “ Castrum vero Doveram (says William of Poictiers) Odoni fratri suo commisit, cum adjacente ord australi.” I.e. “ But the Castle of NOTES. 155 Odo Costos Dover, with the adjacent south shore, he committed to his brother Dovee. Qdo.” The following are the words of Ordericus Yitalis (who, by the way, professes to be putting forth nothing but the history of William of Poictiers) relative to the same transaction :— “ Doveram, vero, tctamque Cantiam fratri suo comraendavit, qui multa liberalitate et industria seculari pollebat.” (See Ordericus Vitalis, ut supra, lib. iv. ch. i.) I e. “ Dover and all Kent he committed to his brother Odo, Bishop of Bayeux, a prelate distinguished by great liberality and worldly activity.” (Translation, tit- supra, vol. ii. p. 5.) Odo, then, was made Earl of Kent, and also Custos of Dover; in other style. Lord Warden. ( 17 .) Extension, p. 2,1. 23,— “ Modo appreciatur xl libris, et tamen pree- positus inde reddit liiij libras. Translation, p. 93, 1. 13,— “Novi it is appraised at forty pounds, and yet the Reve renders fifty-four pounds from it.” Bun n i tits It appears, by the text, that the render of Dover must have been db Dover. more than doubled since the time of the Confessor. It is now appraised at £40, and the Eeve actually pays in £54, instead of the £18 formerly paid, and yet the town had been meanwhile burnt. Grave suspicions here of the hand of Odo. Let us investigate the figures a little more closely, taking as the basis of our calculations the original apportionment of the render between the King and the Earl, viz. two-thirds to the former, and one-third to the latter. According to this division, the total render being now £54, the King should have received £36, and Odo £18; instead of which the former has £24 only, certainly far less than two-thirds, even though we allow for the difference in amount between money paid by stan¬ dard weight and that paid ad numcrum (see Appendix XII.) ; and, on the other hand, Odo is represented as receiving £30 instead of £18. In the next paragraph we read of the King’s loss of the “ custom ” of twenty-nine “ mansurm,” and of Odo being now the Lord of them. This statement readily suggests some clue to the deficiencies in the King’s receipts, and the augmentation in those of Odo (see Note 20, p. 155). The appropriation of the “custom” of the “ mansura) ” will go far to account for it. It is true that the spoils of the Priory may have swelled Odo’s share. The entry at p. 7, 1.21, “Extension,” and p. 97, 1. 16, “Translation,” records that the Priory’s share of the Toll of Dover, which, in the time of King Edward, had been only £8, amounted afterwards to £22,—an immense increase,—of which the Priory, according to that entry, afterwards received the full benefit, however Odo may have previ¬ ously wronged them. But the appropriation of the custom of the “mansura)” will, of itself, go far to account for the great increase in Odo’s receipts. In whatever light we view the case, we have abun¬ dance of room for conjecture as to the causes of the preponderating amount of Odo’s portion. Indeed, the enormous increase of the en¬ tire render may, perhaps, be ascribed to his able administration of the revenue of the port while Custos, even though his services were not entirely disinterested. ( 18 .) Extension, p. 2, 1. 24,— “De denariis qui sunt xx li in ora.” Translation, p. 93, 1. 14,— “In pence of twenty to the ore.” Oba. It must be remembered that, at the time of the Survey, the only coin known in circulation was the silver penny—the “ denarius; the standard value of which was the twentieth part of an Ora. The Ora was not a coin, but merely a measure of computation by weight; it was the same as our ounce, and twelve of these ounces, Orce, were equal to a pound weight; hence, the silver penny of actual currency being equal to one twentieth part of an Ora, two hundred and forty, if of standard weight, should weigh one pound; and this pound must, therefore, have been exactly equal, in money value, to our pound sterling. (See Appendix XI.) The King’s Exchequer would admit only of payments tested by weight, or by combustion. In this case, then, the claim of the King would be for twenty-four pounds in standard pennies of twenty to the ounce or Ora. He was to receive payment ad scalam or ad pensum. Whatever depreciation the coin might have sustained, he was to suffer no loss thereby, but receive the compensation for deficiency as established by the Rules of the Exchequer. (See Appendix XII.) (19.) Extension, p. 2,1. 26,—“ In Douere sunt xxix mansnrcc.” Translation, p. 93,1.16,— “InBouere there are twenty-nine messuages.” “ Mansura,” or as it is sometimes written, “ Masura.” It is not Mansurte. easy to decide the precise meaning of this word, as used in the Survey, because, although it is generally applied to houses with or without land, yet there are instances whero it seems to designate land alone, without a house upon it, as in Extension, p. 47,1. 22. I believe our word “ Messuage,” as ordinarily used, is, as near as may be, the proper representative of Mansura, or Masura. Literally, Mansura would imply an “ abiding place,” a “ residence.” As such, it may be either, simply a house, or a house with land adjoining; in common parlance, a “ detached mansion.” Blomefield states it to be, “ a mansion-house in decay, or a place where a mansion-house formerly stood, or a place convenient to make a house in,” (Norfolk, 402, vol. ii. p. 13,) and this interpre¬ tation seems to correspond with “ Mansura,” in the passage imme¬ diately before us; for, in the preceding paragraph, the Town is stated to have been burnt on the arrival of the Conqueror. The Mansurce, then, of this passage were, probably, the plots where houses had stood; and the King’s loss of Custom may rea¬ dily be ascribed, in the first instance, to the burning out of the Occupiers. On the whole, I have selected “ Messuage” as the most convenient rendering of Mansura or Masura. ( 20 .) Extension, p. 2,1. 26,— “Be quibus Rex perdulit consuetudincm.” Translation, p. 93,1. 16,—“ Of which the King has lost the custom.” In the context, such expressions as “erat Gihalla,”—the introduc- Bex fer- tion of the word dorms in one part of the enumeration of the mes- suages, and its omission in others,—would imply that these Mansura; were the plots of groimd on which houses, and, among them, the Gihalla stood, before the burning of the town; and that such houses as were there were of recent erection. The King, as I have before remarked, may have lost his custom by the burning out of the resi¬ dents ; still, it is difficult to account for the occupiers who now had houses there being free of rents and services. It may have been so, by special grant of the King, to compensate, as far as might be, the losses of the owners in the destruction of their property by the wantonness of his “Norman Squires;” but, then, perdidit, lost, the custom, would hardly seem to be the appropriate term to use. Ponder it as we will, were it not for the concluding sentence of this entry, relatmg to these twenty-nine messuages, we should have nothing but very vague conjecture to guide us to any safe opinion. That sentence, however, that these all, in respect of these houses, avouch the Bishop of BaAeux, as their protector and liveror and donor, at once explicitly records that Odo had become the actual Lord of the Fee; and, inasmuch as this is accompanied by the recorded statement that the King had “ lost the custom,” there is only one inference to be drawn, and that is, that Odo had contrived to filch them from the King. The entry probably is made in the Survey, in order to record that the King’s rights, though in abeyance, are not surrendered. I will not, however, venture upon further conjectures, leaving the case open to the acuteness and research of students. ( 21 .) Extension, p. 2,1. 31,—“ Olhalla Burgensium.” Translation, p. 93,1.18,—“ The Gihalla of the Burgesses.” I. e. The Guild-Hall of the Burgesses. In the valuable Glossary Gihalla— which Mr. Thorpe has appended to his collection of ‘ The Ancient ® UILI,,S ' Laws and Institutes of England,’ vol. ii., we have the following ex¬ planation of the word Gild. “ Gild. —A Club or Association of Persons, instituted for mutual pro¬ tection and benefit. Of these institutions there were various kinds, viz. Fritwilds (see sub voce). Trades Gilds (the original of our civic companies), Merchants’ Gilds, Ecclesiastical Gilds, etc.” And of FriiSgild he gives this account— « BriSgxld. —A gild for the maintenance of peace and security. This name was given to certain gilds or clubs, established during or before the rei^n of King Athelstan, for the repression of theft, the tracing of stolen cattle, and the indemnification of parties robbed, by means of a common fund raised by subscription of the members ( yeylldan). The statutes of 15G NOTES. Guilds, these'gilds are contained in the Judicia Civitatis Lundonije (see Laws of ^Ethelstan Y.), set forth, under royal authority, by the Bishop and Beeves of the City.” Kemble (‘ Saxons in England,’ vol. i. 238-254) almost identifies them, in earlier times, with the Institution of the Tithings, and, as such, hardly concedes that they could have been originally altogether voluntary associations. He admits, however, the existence of certain Gilds, in the more social character of Clubs; but, after all, leaves the question in much uncertainty. For the satisfaction of those who wish to study it more carefully, I have collected his observa¬ tions, and printed them in the Appendix, with the documentary evidences which he adduces, including a Translation of the Judicia Civitatis Lundonie and the Institutions of the Guilds of Abbotsbury, Exetek, and Cambridge. (See Appendix XIII.) The Gild of “ the Burgesses” of Dover, collectively, must almost necessarily have been of the nature of the Frrbgild, described in the Judicia Civitatis Lundonue ; and the Gihalla of the text must have been the Hall in which they held their Courts, and (we may add) their social festivities. We are justified in making this addition by the eighth clause in these “ Judicia,” viz. “ That these twelve men have their refection together, and feed themselves according as they may deem themselves worthy.” We can hardly doubt that their estimation of their own worth was not so niggard, but that they provided a liberal symposium for themselves and their friends. Festivities were certainly not precluded by these “ Judicia,” for we have here an actual clause providing for them. In speaking of the Gilds in general. Turner says :—“ They seem, on the whole, to have been friendly associations made for mutual aid and contribution, to meet the pecuniary exigencies which were perpetually arising from burials, legal exactions, penal mulcts, and other payments or compensations.” (Turner, Hist. Anglo-Saxons.) If this statement be correct, we can easily account for the forma¬ tion of separate Gilds by the different trades and professions. The national institution of the “ FriSborga ” (see Appendix VIII.) as part of the Common Law of the land, seems to have been the natural parent of the “ FrtfSgilda; ” and thence, of the other Gilds formed by the different trades, mutual protection and responsibility being the prin¬ ciple of them all,—a principle that pervades the whole Saxon polity, and which meets us at every turn in all their institutions. ( 22 .) Extension, p. 2, 1. 34 ,—“ Revocant Episcopum Baiocensem adprotec- torem, et liberatorem, et datorem.” Translation, p. 93, 1. 20,— “Avouch the Bishop of Baieux as their protector, and liveror, and donor." Odo. In all feoffments the grantor of the house or estate, the party who had given livery and seisin, the liveror {liberator et da,tor) to the feof¬ fee, in case of litigation, was called to warranty, to vouch it to him; but the introduction of the word “ protector ” seems to imply something more in this case. In fact, it amounts to a direct asser¬ tion that the Bishop, and not the King, was now the Lord of the Fee of these twenty-nine messuages. The King had lost the con- suetudinem, the rents and services, and the tenants now owed alle¬ giance and service, as far as these messuages were concerned, to the Bishop only. The Lord was bound to protect those who owed him fealty in all suits in which they had to appear in other courts than his own. “ Those,” says Kerable, “ who, in a more or less stringent degree, were dependent, could not be members of the tithing, the hundred, or the folc- mot (i.e. the Scyremot, or County Court). They stood to right among themselves, in their Lord’s Court, not in the people’s; and, in the latter, they could not appear for themselves. The institution, therefore, which provided that the Lord might maintain a Comitatus, £>r following, provided also that its members should all be in his mund (protection) and borh (surety), and that he should make answer for them in the Courts from which they were themselves excluded.” (Kemble, ‘ Saxons in England,’ vol. i. 256.) “ The several lords were reciprocally bound, in their respective grada¬ tions, to protect the possessions which they had given.” (Blackstone, book ii. ch. iv. 46.) The Lords of Manors frequently commended their tenants to another Lord, that is, placed them under his protection , numerous instances of which are cited by Mr. Morgan, who further observes, “ The commended “men of a great lord formed a compact body of retainers, sureties, and i in the Court f Wri f t . “ et hoc paratus sum probare per liunc liberum meum, A. B., which was a Odo. “tender of battle.’ (Selden on Fortescue.).The engagements “ of commendation were reciprocal. (Glanvil, vol. ix. c. 4.) In Domesday, «when a man’s title is disputed, he appeals to his chief, he calls Kobert “ Malet to warrant (‘ Domesday,’ vol. ii. 311), or declares the King to be “his advocate (‘Domesday,’ vol. i. 227 b) ; and when Brungar was accused “of stealing horses, ltobert Fitzwimarc, who had commendation over him, “ and the Abbot of Edmuudsburg, who had sac and soc, attended the plea “ in the Hundred Court on his behalf.” (‘ Domesday,’ vol. ii. 401.) (Mor- “gan, ‘ England under the Normans,’ pp. 122-125.) The passage in Glanvile, to wliicli Mr. Morgan here refers, is the following:— “ Beciprocal, indeed, ought to be the relation of fidelity between domi¬ nion and homage. Nor does the tenant owe more to his lord, in respect of homage, than the lord owes to the tenant on account of dominion, rever¬ ence alone excepted. Hence, if one person give to another any land in re¬ turn for service and homage, which is afterwards recovered against the tenant bg a third person, the lord shall be bound to warrant such land to him, or to return him an adequate equivalent .” (Glanvile, book ix. ch. 4.) On these principles, constituting the reciprocal obligations of the Lord and his tenant, it is evident, from the context, that the King had lost his claim to the services of the tenants of these twenty-nine messuages, and that Odo was the Lord to whom these services were now due. (23.) Extension, p. 2, 1. 36,— “ Bimidia terra est Regis." Translation, p. 93, 1. 23,— “Half the land is the King’s." Here we have two more instances of spoliation. In the ‘ Laws of Odo. Canute,’ ch. xiii., we have this enactment with regal’d to “ whoever does a deed of outlawry: ”—“ If he have hoc-land (i. e. land of per¬ petual inheritance, held by an actual charter or deed of grant), let that be forfeited into the King’s hand, be he man of whatever man he may.” It appears that in the case of the messuage of Bannulph de Columbels, it had been the property of an outlaw, and, as such, for¬ feited to the King. The claim of the King here registered is only to one-half of it; and, in like manner, Humfridus Loripes holds a messuage, to half of which the King laid claim by forfeiture. We have no evidence how the King’s claim became limited to one-half only in these forfeitures. It is not impossible that he may have made a grant of one-half, in each instance, to Odo, who then appro¬ priated the whole, which he consigned to B-annulph and Humphrey, to hold of himself as though he were Lord of the Fee. The state of property in Dover (for we shall presently have more instances of spoliation) seems to have been a very precarious one during the rule of Odo ; and it was high time for an investigation of title, and for a Quo Warrranto to restore the King to his rights. (24.) Extension, p. 2,1. 37,— “Humfridus Loripes." Translation, p. 93, 1. 23,— “Humphrey tlio Bandylegged." “Loripes,”—Bandylegged. This is a decided nickname. No Nicknames. ridicule was probably intended by this designation. Before the established use of surnames, a recourse to nicknames was almost necessary, and certainly of very frequent occurrence. (25.) Extension, p. 2,1. 39 ,—“ Et tenuit hue usque consuetudinem Regis." Translation, p. 93, 1. 25,— “Has to this day kept to Imnsef the King’s custom." Hero is another act of spoliation. Roger de Ostreliam seems to Odo. have bridged a house over the King’s Water, probably over the Dour, the stream which fed the harbour; or it may have been an encroach¬ ment upon the harbour itself, which, at that time, must have run up between the cliffs or hills,—all the different harbours, as now exist¬ ing, having been formed at different periods from the reign of Henry VIII. downwards. Whatever the house or building was, it was a palpable encroachment; it was a new erection, where no house had existed in the time of the Confessor; and not only was it an encroachment on the King’s Water-Highway, but, after it was built, it appears that the King’s right, as Lord of Dover, to cus- ...... ignored by tl builder nother r f NOTES. of the disorganized state of property i: say nothing of his own spoliations. Dover under Odo’s rule, to Mitt at Mouth of Harbour— Odo. Extension, p. 2,1. 41 ,—“ In mtroitu portus do, Douere,” etc. Translation, p. 93, 1. 27,— “In the entrance of the Fort, of Douere.” Here again we have another instance of encroachment on the King’s rights and property, and again Odo appears as the prin¬ cipal aggressor. Episcopus Ba/iocensis concessit ilium fieri; “The Bishop of Baieux granted leave for its erection.” The very form in which this complaint is recorded proves that it was made after Odo’s banishment and disgrace. There is no appeal to him or the subject, no reply on his part, but an unanswered charge that, when he was in power at Dover, he had sanctioned this encroach¬ ment and outrage on the King’s lieges there. It is not easy to conjecture how this mill could have been situated to cause such damage to the shipping in entering the port, even though we carry ourselves back to the straitened harbour then run¬ ning up between the hills. If turned by the river Dour on its course to the harbour, no damage could have been inflicted on the ship¬ ping in entering, it could have caused no swell there. Even if we suppose that the turmoil of the milltail was met by the rushing in of the tide, and a dangerous swell to boats caused thereby, yet this could hardly have been so near the mouth of the harbour as to damage ships on entering it. Something of this kind, however, must have caused the complaint. In illustration of this aggression of Odo, I would refer to p. 7 of the Extension, and 97 of the Translation. We have there Rannulph de Columbels, Robert de Romenel, Wadard, Ralph de Cdrbespine, and this Herbert Fitz Ivo, all of them his creatures and tenants (as may be seen, again and again, in the enumeration of the Bishops’ Manors)—all of them paying him bribes for the plunder of the possessions of St. Martin’s Priory—all of them in the list of those whom he had located in the King’s Demesne of Dover, in those twenty-nine messuages of which the King is described as having “ lost the custom; ” or, in plain English, as having been plundered of their rents and services by this lordly thief. Among the Bishop’s spoliations, it is stated in the Extension, p. 7, 1. 42, and Translation, p. 97, 1. 35,— Herbertus filius Ivonis dedit episcopo Baiocensi marrhajm auri pro uno molino eorum, nolenti- busillis; i.e. Herbert, son of Ivo, game the Bishop of Baieux a ma,rlc of gold for one of their mills, against their will. It very possibly may have been an extension of the buildings and works of this very mill, of which the complaint is made in the text; buildings and works which were not there “in the time of King Edward.” (See Ap¬ pendix XIV.) (27.) Extension, p. 3, 1. 1,—“ Has infra scriptas Leges Begis concordant homines de iiij Lestis.” Translation, p. 93,1. 31,—“ The men of four Laths agree that these underwritten are the King’s Laws.” It is important to observe, that the grammatical construction of these words will hardly admit of the supposition that the men of the four Laths are recorded as assenting to, i. e. giving : a their adhesion or submission to new Laws imposed upon them by the Conqueror. On no principle of grammar can the passage be so rendered. On the contrary, the form of expression here used, nay, the entire con¬ tents of this page of the Survey, seem rather to indicate that it is an actual transcript from an ancient Book of Record. Indeed, as I have observed in the Introduction, it is palpable that the Commissioners, in almost every instance, had the Court Books of the Manors, or Hundreds, or Tithings, before them, and thence made their transcripts, correcting or enlarging them, according to the oral evidence produced before them. The forms of the entries throughout the Survey, and the varied style which they assume, according to the district at the time under review, forbid any doubt upon the subject; and, if we examine a little more closely the page be¬ fore us, we shall find incontestable evidence, if such were needed, that it has been copied from a Record of the time of the Confessor. The list of the alodiaries exempted from Relief to the King con¬ tains the names of the powerful Saxon Nobles, or Thanes, who sub¬ sequently appear in the Survey, as formerly Lords of Manors holding Feai.tt c of King Edward ; but not one of them now possessing any estate. ^ Their lands had been seized by the Conqueror, or else had escheated to him,—their names and grandeur are things of the past; yet here they are entered as of the present,—and we cannot doubt that we have before us the actual enrolment of the rights of the Crown, and of their own privileges and customs, as it was made during their lives, and as it was still to remain. Here, then, we have indisputable evidence, that, at least, the Men of these four Laths were left in the enjoyment of them ancient Laws and Customs. But, one word in passing, as to this Territorial division, here called “ Lesta.” Sir Henry Ellis says (Int. to Domesday, 4°, p. 98) “ The Lest, Last, or Lathe, is stated, in the Laws of Edward the Confessor, to have been the same with the Riding. It could not, however, have comprised the third part of the Shire, as, in Kent, the only county in which it is named, no less than seven distinct Laths occur. It derived its name from the Saxon JelalSian, to assemble: and Spelman cites a passage in his Glossary, from the ‘ Ordinatio Marisci Romeneiensis,’ p. 73, where it has a simi¬ lar signification, Si aUqwis super hoc convincatur per testimonium ballivi et juratorum in com,muni Lasto, amercietur in x solidis.” Bishop Kennett, in a MS. Glossary among the Lansdowne MSS. n. 1098, p. 235, says, “ The annual Court at Dimchurch, in Romney Marsh, held for the election of a Bailiff and other officers, is called Dimchurch Lath.” The four Laths specified are those which constitute the Eastern Division of the County, viz.:— “ Borwar Lest,” and Estre Lest, now united, aud forming the modern Lath of St. Augustine,— “Liwart Lest,” now, the Lath op Shipway, “ Wiwart Lest,” now, the Lath op Scray. (See Appendix.) How is it, that the Two Laths of West Kent, viz. “ Aylesford,” and “ Sutton at Hone,” do not here come upon the scene ? It is true that in the next page of the Survey, forming, as it were, the closing paragraph to the chapter before us, we have the list of all the Saxon Nobles, constituting the strength of these two Laths, all of them, in the time of the Confessor, powerful Lords of Manors, and specially recorded as holding their own courts, endowed with the franchise of Sac and Soc; but not one word of their acknow¬ ledgment of the king’s privileges, as in the case of the other four Laths. There seems, iu this respect, to have been no bond of union be¬ tween them, any more than if they had belonged to two different coun¬ ties. Indeed Kemble, on the authority of ancient charters, tells us that the division of the county into East and West Kent was then most distinctly marked. In a note (‘ Saxons in England,’ vol. i. p. 78), he says, “ The division of Kent into East Centingas and West Centingas is retained by the charters till late in the eleventh century.” The two divisions of the county seem almost to have been as dis¬ tinct as they are at present, and it is difficult to account for the omis¬ sion of the two laths of West Kent in this passage; indeed they seem to be completely ignored. It may be, that their Books of Record were lost, or not forthcoming. Whatever the cause, it is impossible to pass it by without notice. The fate of the Lords of this Western Division differed not from that of the Alodiaries in the Eastern Division. We find the names of all of them as having held manors of King Edward, and all of them now dispossessed,—like their compeers of East Kent, things of the past. In both cases, either these great lords had refused submission to the Conqueror, and he had thereupon seized their estates; or, they were among the host of nobles who fell at Hastings, and their lands, in consequence, had escheated to the Crown. Had we time and space to follow out the fortunes of those whose names are here recorded, we should be able to show that one or other of those fates befell several of those among them whose his¬ tories are known to us. I confess that, on my first perusal of this paragraph, I was unable to resist the temptation of deeming it, in some degree, confirmatory of the tradition in which Men of Kent delight, viz. that their ancestors, with Stiqand at their head, met the Conqueror at Swanscomb, and refused submission to him unless they were guaranteed their ancient ~h 158 NOTES. Fealty of laws and customs,—tendering him the choice between the oak-boughs ENT ’ which they each bore in one hand, as an emblem of peace, or the sword which they carried in the other. But, unfortunately, a very little reflection shows that the evidence of this chapter has a tendency exactly the reverse to a confirmation of the story. It is mentioned only by one chronicler, Sprot, who wrote as late as the time of Edward I.; while not the slightest allu¬ sion to it is made by any of the chroniclers who lived nearest to the time of its occurrence,—nay, some of them actually contempo- We have just seen that all the lords of manors, enumerated as the great chiefs of the Western Division (those who themselves, or their heirs, must have been with Stigand at Swanscomb, had the tale been true), so far from being left in the enjoyment of their ancient laws and customs, were actually disinherited,—their estates seized, and conferred by the Conqueror on his followers. If there be any shade of evidence, in this chapter, that the Men op Kent obtained a grant of the enjoyment of their ancient customs, it is in favour of this privilege having been given to the men of East Kent,—the “ men of the four Lathes,”—rather than to those of West Kent; for we have it here actually recorded of this district, that the King’s rights, and those of the Alodiaries and Churches, remained as they were in the time of the Confessor. Golielmus Pictavensis, in his account of William’s proceedings after the surrender of Dover, describes him as staying there eight days to strengthen the fortifications, and that then— “ Custodiam inibi relinquens, et dysenteria languentes, ad perdo- mandum quos devicit proficiscitur.” “ Occurrunt ultro Cantuarii baud procul a Dovera, jurant fideli- tatem, dant obsides. Contremuit etiam potens metropolis metu, et ne funditus caderet ullatenus resistendo, maturavit impetrare, statum obediendo.” I. e., “ Leaving a garrison there, and those who were suffering from dysentery, he marched on, to complete the subjugation of those he had vanquished.” “ The Kentish Men, of their own accord, met him, not far from Dover, and swore fealty to him, delivering hostages for their alle¬ giance. The powerful metropolis {i. e. Canterbury), also, trembled with fear, and lest, by further resistance, it should be utterly de¬ stroyed, hastened by submission to obtain leave for it to stand.” We can hardly avoid noticing here the adoption of the term “ Can- tuakii ” for Kentish men, instead of the usual “ Cantiani.” It is only the Saxon Canhvaro, Cantwaru, Latinized. Now it is not at all impossible but that at this conference with the Conqueror, when the “ Kentish men swore fealty to him,” he, on his part, pledged himself that, inasmuch as he came to England to enter upon his inheritance, and not as a foreign usurper, he would leave the country’s laws and customs undisturbed; but this is very different from a specific grant to the Men op Kent, that these privileges should be theirs alone. They were, in due course, the first of the kingdom who had conference with him ; and it is pos¬ sible that this circumstance led to the retention of their ancient customs; how it happened that similar results were not obtained in other parts, it is beside our purpose here to inquire. Thus, the accident of this conference between the Men of Kent and William, as he began his march onward, furnishes, perhaps, a shadowy foundation for the tale of Sprot, which Somner, with good reason, rejects as a mere fiction. (28.) Extension, p. 3,1. 3,—“ Si quis fecerit sepem . . . pro quo,” etc. Translation, p. 93, 1. 33 ,—“ If any one shall make a hedge,” etc. Tile King’s “ Pro quo.”—I will just observe in passing, that in various pas- LiWS ' sages of the survey, “pro ” is used in the sense of “by” as here we have “ pro quo ” for “ by which.” Obstructions of the King’s Highway were cognizable at the Lords’ Courts, and it was important to define the respective rights of the Crown and the Lord. The chief point to be noticed in this clause is, that a double penalty is incurred by the party who throws a tree across the road, and then removes it. The obstruction to the King’s Highway by throwing a tree across it is punishable by a fine of five pounds. The tree, before it was felled, was the property of the Lord on whose soil it grew; but once fallen into the King’s Highway, it would seem as though the Crown then claimed it, and punished with another fine of five pounds auy one, even the Lord himself, who should presume to ap¬ propriate it or carry off the smallest portion of it. This was one of the three customs reserved to the King, his rights thereto, even in the estates of the Church, being specifically acknowledged to him, in the celebrated Penenden Controversy. (See Appendix XIV.) (29.) Extension, p. 3,1. 7, —“Pro unaquaque hanim forisfacturarum.” Translation, p. 93,1. 34, —“For each of these forfeitures.” “ Forisfactura ” sometimes means a crime, or fault, as in this Foeisfac- instance. TURA ' So also in the laws of Edward the Confessor. (Thorpe, vol. i. 454, ch. xxviij.) “ Secundum quod forisfacture erant, emendationes et ordinaciones faciebant.” I. c. “According to what the crimes were, they made amends and ordinances.” So again in the same laws. (Thorpe, vol. i. 457, ch. xxxiij.) “Major emendacio forisfacture Saxonum erat qnater xx libere et iiij.” I. e. “ The larger amend for crime among the Saxons was four¬ score and four pounds.” More generally, however, forisfactura was a fine, or penalty, as in the Laws of William the Conqueror. (Thorpe, vol. i. p. 485, ch. xlij.) “ Qui legem equam et justum judicium subire renuit, forisfactu- ram reddat ei eujus erat juris illam accipere. Si adversus Begem, vj libras, si adversus Comitem, xl solidos, si in hundredo, vol in cujuscumque Curia, qui earn ex libertate habere debet, xxx solidos Anglicos.” I. e. “ He who refuses to submit to equal law and just judgment let him pay a penalty to him whose right it is to receive it. If against the King, six pounds. If against the Earl, forty shillings. If in the Hundred, or in the Court of any one who, by franchise, ought to hold it, thirty shillings English.” And, in this sense of a penalty, forisfactura is almost universally used in the survey. (80.) Extension, p. 3,1. 8,—“ Si abierit domum,” etc. Translation, p. 93, 1. 35,—“ If he shall have gone home.” This offence was not to be tiled in the Lords’ Court. The offender Amenable was amenable to the King alone, and the King’s officer, if he were not apprehended on the spot, and bailed, could follow him home, and summarily inflict a penalty of five pounds. Other offences, it will be seen, were not liable to the direct or summary punishment here ordained. ( 81 .) Extension, p. 3,1. 10,— “He Gribrige vero.” Translation, p. 90, 1. 37, —“Concerning Gribrige.” Gribrige, or Grithbrech, was Breach of the Peace. “ Grithbrech, Pacis fractio, seu violentia, a Sax jju' 5, id est Pax, et bpych,/racfio.” (Spelman.) In the Laws of Henry I. (ch. xii. 2; Thorpe, vol. i. p. 523) we have : “ Hec emendantur c solinis, gripbreche, stretbreche, etc. etc.” I. e. “ The emend for the following crimes, is one hundred shillings; gripbreche, stretbreche, etc.” At line 12, Extension, and of Translation 1. 38, in the continuation of the penalties and consequences of Gribrige, occurs a passage which seems to require a passing note. “ Sin autem“ If not accused on the spot, then his Lord, and not the King, takes cognizance of the offence. Perhaps this may be taken as an explanation of the “tamen,” (“yet the King’s officer shall follow him home,”) of the preceding paragraph. In that case, even if he reach home, neither apprehended nor bailed, unattached, yet still the King’s prerogative reaches him though within his own Lord’s precinct, the King 5 s officer follow him home and fines him; NOTES. 159 but, m the case of Gribrige, if he reach home unchallenged he is amenable to his Lord and not to the King, (32.) Extension, p. 3,1. 15,— “ Super omnes alodiarios .” Translation, p. 93, 1. 41,— “ Over all the alodiaries.” Alodiaries. The alodiaries were the possessors of free hereditary estates. " The tenure of alodium, in the Survey, refers to the tenants and possessors chiefly before the Conquest. It signifies an hereditary and perpetual estate free and in the power of the possessors to dis¬ pose of by gift or sale, but subject to the common and constant land-tax of Hidage; and in Kent the King, on the commission of particular offences, was entitled to pecuniary mulcts from all the alodial tenants and their men. He was also, on the death of an alodial tenant, entitled to relief/’ (Kelham, p. 154.) (33.) Extension, p. 3,1. 16,— “ Qiiando moritur alodiarius, Rex inde habet relevationem terree.” Translation, p. 93, 1. 42,— “ When an alodiwry dies, the King there¬ upon has relief of his land.” Relief A!iD “ vdleviiim, from relevare, to lift or take up again. It is a sum paid by the heir to the Lord on taking, or lifting up again the inheritance of an estate which has, as it were, fallen to the ground by the death of the ancestor.” (Kemble, * Saxons in England/ note, vol. i. p. 79.) The ancient writers frequently confounded tho relief with the heriot, but they were essentially different. Kemble most clearly de¬ scribes the distinction between them thus :— “ The horse and arms which, in the strict theoi'y of the comitatus, had been the gift, or, rather, the loan of the chief, were to be re¬ turned at the death of the vassal, in order, according to the same theory, that they might furnish some other adventurer with the in¬ struments of service. These, technically called heregeatwe, arma- tura hellica, have continued, even to our own day, under the name of heriot, and, strictly speaking, consist of horses and weapons. In later imitation of this, the unfree settlers on a Lord’s land who were not called upon by their tenure to perform military service were bound, on demise, to pay the best chattel ( melius catallum, best head, in German beste hawpte, heriot-custom, as opposed to heriot-service) to the Lord, probably on the theoretical hypothesis that he, at the commencement of the tenancy, had supplied the necessary imple¬ ments of agriculture. And this differs entirely from a relief, because heriot is the act of the leaving, relief the act of the incoming tenant or heir; and because, in its very nature and amount, heriot is of a somewhat indefinite character which relief is not.” (Kemble, ‘ Saxons in England,’ vol. i. p. 178.) “ Relief” was a Saxon heriot, but the Normans seem to have con¬ ceived it to be the same that their Norman relief was; and there¬ fore translated the word heriot, by releviamentum, or relevvum, and raising the form of their feudal law in England, drew the Saxon customs to cohere therewith as much as might be. But there is a great difference between heriots and reliefs ; for heriots were iniUUce apparatus, which the word signifieth, and devised by Canute, to keep the conquered nation in subjection, and to support the public strength and military furniture of the kingdom; the reliefs for the private commodity of the Lord, that he might not have imitilem proprietatem in the seignory.” (Kelham, p. 312. See Appendix XY.) (34.) Extension, p. 3,1. 19,— “ Exceptis Ids, Godric de Burnes,” etc. Translation, p. 93,1. 43,— “Except these, Godric de Bwrnes," etc. Excepted It must not be forgotten that the passage before us is evidently Lakds. the copy of an older record than the Survey, else we may be un¬ consciously beguiled into the supposition that these great Saxon lords were at this time in possession of their hereditary estates. (35.) Extension, p. 3,1. 21,— “Be capitibus corum tantummodo.” Translation, p. 93,1. 45,— “From their chattels only.” CnlrrE 1 am indebted to Mr - Thorpe, the learned editor of the ‘ Antient Laws and Institutes of England,’ for this rendering. In a letter which he kindly wrote to me iu answer to my application to him for Capita. assistance in explaining the passage, he says:— Chattels. “ I believe the rendering of capita by chattels is correct, at all events “it is etymologically legitimate; still I should be very glad if, before “ adopting it, you would look into such authorities as you possess, to see “ whether any corroboration of my suggestion is to be found, e. g. “Spelman’s ‘ Glossarium,’ ‘The Law Dictionary,’ Kelham, aud others; “ for it would be lamentable to incur the expense of a cancel, and, after “ all, to find something better than what I propose.” On referring to Spelman, in accordance with Mr. Thorpe’s ad¬ vice, I find the most complete confirmation of his kind suggestion, thus:— Capitol—Capital—Captale—Cafitalia. “ Bona qufecunque mobilia et immobilia. Proprie, tamen, ea bonorum “pars qiue in animalibus consistit, a quorum capitibus, res ipsa3, alias “ capita, alias capitalia, dicta sunt per syncopen captalia et catalia, unde “ forense nostrum vocabulum catalia, Anglice chattels.'" (Spelman in verbo.) (36.) Extension, p. 3,1. 23 ,—“ Be terns eorum habet rcleocumen, cpd habent svam saccvm et socam.” Translation, p. 93,1. 46 ,—“ And from the lands of those who have their own Saca and Soca, he has Relief.” I have felt bound, upon principle, to translate relevamen literally, *■ relief ” — relief; but I have not the smallest doubt that it here implies F0B Heriot. heriot. The Normans (as observed in Note 33, supra) used to con¬ found the Saxon heriot with their own relief. The case before us is a signal instance of the practice, for here relevcmnen must almost necessarily be heriot. Those who had their own Saca and Soca held by military service (as explained by Brady, Note 45, infra); and, if not, at this time, liable to all the incidents of knight-service which were imposed upon such tenants in days very closely following the Conquest, were at least liable to the payment of a heriot—militice apparatus, on a demise; while relief alone was the claim upon the heir of a tenant who was not called upon to perform military service. (See Note 33, supra.) (37.) Extension, p. 3,1. 29 ,—“ llandsoca, Gribrige, Foristel.” Translation, p. 93, 1. 50, —“ Handsoc, Gribrige, Foristel.” Handsoc was a breach of the peace by forcible entry into a man’s jtandsog house. It is explained at length in the Laws of Henry I. ch. lxxx. BTa 2 :—“ Hamsocna est, si quis alium in sua vel alterius domo, cum haraido, assaliaverit vel persequatur, ut portam vel domum sagittet, vel lapidet, vel colpum ostensibilem undecunque faciat.” I. e. Eam- socn is, if any one, with an array, assail or pursue another, in his own or another’s house, so as to shoot arrows, or cast stones at tho door or house, or inflict visible injury in any part.” Gribrige has been already explained. (See Note 31.) Foristel is the obstructing or assaulting another in the highway. (38.) Extension, p. 3, 1. 30 ,—“Be adultcrio wo.” Translation, p. 93, 1. 51,— “ Concerning adultery.” Among the Laws of Henry I. ch. xi. 5, we have “ Qui uxoratns Adultery. faciet adulterium, habeat Rex ejus superiorem, episcopus inferiorem.” I. e. “ If a married man commit adultery, let the King have the superior, the Bishop the inferiorwhich, in fact, is to the same purport as the passage iu the text :—“ Concerning adultery, through the whole of Kent, the King has the man, and the archbishop the woman.” I. e. as their slaves. (See Appendix XYI.) (39.) Extension, p. 3,1. 36,—“ A lnodi Gilt et similium ejus.” Translation, p. 9 4,1. 1,—“ Alnod Gilt, and, his peers.” If we refer back to the list of these “ Alnodi Cilt et similium,” we Lands sur- shall find that they had been all among the mthelings and great king’s T, ' B lords of the county. And the record here states that it was from Guard. their lands that the King’s guard was to be supplied. Perhaps it was in return for this service that they were exempted from the payment of Relief on a demise. 160 NOTES. Alnod Cim. It appears, by the next paragraph, that these were the great nobles of the County who assembled at the Sliiremot. This Alnocl Cilt was Ui.noth, fourth son of Earl Godwin, and younger brother to King Harold. When Godwin was recalled from banishment Denote was sent into Normandy as a hostage, and re¬ mained there till after the Conquest, when he was brought back to England, and kept a prisoner at Salisbury till his death. The term Cild, or Cilt, was a “Title nearly synonymous with iE-Seling, though unlike it in being given not only to the younger branches of royalty, but to those of the highest families; as ‘ Wulf- noth Cild/ 'Eadric Cild.’ Even Edgar 2Etheling is sometimes called ' Eadgar Cild.’ So, in France, under the old regime, we have Fnfants de France; also in Spain.” (Thorpe’s ‘ Glossary to Anglo- Saxon Chronicle.’) (40.) Extension, p. 3, 1. 40,—“ JJt conveniant ad sciram Translation, p. 94,1. 4,—“ To meet at a Shir emote.” Swremote. The Laws of Henry I. enter fully into the details of the Shire- mote, and the rank of those who constituted the Court. In cli. vii. (Thorpe, vol. i. p. 513), it is ordained that the Bishops, Earls, Sheriffs, etc., Ealdormen, Provosts, etc. etc., shall attend,— and that the Scyremot shall be held twice a year. And in ch. xxix. 3, the penalty for non-attendance, as far as Wessex is con¬ cerned, is set at 20 marks. In Kent, as appears by the context, the penalty was five pounds. The Court was “usually held” says Kemble, “under the pre¬ sidency of the Ealdorman and Bishop, and of the Sirgerefa, who, from his later title of Vicecomes,—Vicedominus, was probably looked upon as the Ealdorman’s deputy.In a celebrated trial of title to land at Wouldham in Kent, where Archbishop Dimstan himself was a party concerned, the case seems to have been disposed of by Wulfsige, the Shireman, or Sheriff, alone (Cod. Dipl. n. 1288). The Bishop of Rochester being, in some sort, a party to the suit, could, probably, not take his place as a judge; and the Ealdorman is not mentioned at all. Again, in an important trial of title to land at Snodland, in Kent, there is no mention whatever of the Ealdor¬ man. The King’s writ was sent to the Archbishop; and the Sheriff Leofric, and the thanes of East and West Kent met to try the cause at Canterbury (Cod. Dip. n. 729). It may, then, be concluded, that the presence of the Sheriff was necessary in any case, while that of the Ealdorman might be dispensed with. By the provisions of our later Kings, it appeal’s that the Scirgemot, or Sheriff’s court for the county, was to be holden twice in the year, and before this were brought all the most important causes, and such as exceeded the competence of the hundred.” (Kemble’s ‘ Saxons in England,’ vol. ii. p. 158-160.) In accordance with the laws, as above cited, it appears that Alnod Cild and his peers, the AEthelings and great Thanes of Kent, were bound to attend the Scirmot, when summoned, under a penalty of five pounds. (See Appendix XVII.) (41.) Extension, p. 3, 1. 40,—“ Tbant usque ad Pimiedennan non longius.” Translation, p. 94,1. 4,—“ They shall go as far as Pinnedenn, not further." Pe.n-e.ndkx. Penenden Heath then was, even before the Conquest, the ap¬ pointed place for holding the Sciremot,—and County Meetings,—as it is to this hour. Thither, still, the Sheriff summons the Free¬ holders to meet and nominate their Knights of the Shire. Thither are summoned, on all occasions, the men of Kent, to hold their meetings for public and political purposes. There is a lofty mound there, at the meeting of the roads from Maidstone, now enclosed within the grounds of Foley House, which has a very suspicious look as having been the mote, or hill on which the Gemot was held. (42.) Extension, p. 3,1. 45,—“ ij caretas et ij sticas angmllarum.” Translation, p. 94, 1. 8,—“ Two crates and tivo sticks of eels.” Caketa, a Crate, from Carex, a Rush, of which material the Crate was made. Du Cange quotes a passage:—“ Ad quandam insulam Careta. diversis nemoribus, stagnis et carectis variis devenit, nomine Croy- landiam.” I. e. “ He came to a certain island called Croyland, with various woods, pools, and rushes.” So again,— Caretdm, “ Locus ubi crescunt carites (earices) vel ubi reponuntur.” I.e. “A place where rushes grow or are stored.” And again, under Oaratus, he quotes :— “ Interea agricola) insistunt, frugesque futuras Sepibus aut fossis properant munire caratis.” I. e. “ The farmers pause, meanwhile, and set about fencing their future crops with hedges and ditches and crates.” Stica, a stick of eels. Every stick was to have 25 eels (Kelham). g TICK Among the Surrenden MSS. was a small quarto volume of the Eei -s. time of Ed. I., containing the then existing Statutes of the Realm. It was one of those collections of the. Statutes which it is supposed the Judges carried with them on their Circuits. In one of these Statutes, viz. “ Statutum de ponderibus et men- suris,” is the following clause:— Binda anguillarum constat ex x stikes, et quodlibet Stick ex xxv angwilUs. I. e. A Bind of Eels consists of 10 Stikes,—and each Stick of 25 Eels. The same measures are given in the ‘ Statutes of the Realm,’ vol. i. p. 205. (43.) Extension, p. 3, 1. 45,—“ Pro umo Ineuuwrdo.” Translation, p. 94,1. 9,— “In lieu of one Ineward.” “ Inewardi ” were men appointed to guard the person of the Ineward. King, when he lodged in a city. Also, those who attended the sheriff. Others who were to do servile works about the King’s de¬ mesnes. (Kelham.) By the context, it seems that the specified lands in Wye were liable to the customary service of one guard each, for three days, when the King came to Canterbury or Sandwich; or certain pay¬ ments in lieu thereof. (44.) Extension, p. 3,1. 46,—“ De nno jugo de Northhurg.” Translation, p. 94, 1. 9, —“From one yoke of Northhurg.” Among all the difficulties which occur in the interpretation of Jugum. Domesday, none are greater than those connected with the mea- ’ surements of land; all arising from the fact that, in those days, measurements were not made by graduated lines and rods, but by a much more practical standard, viz. the actual work done by the plough or the labourer in a given space of time; which, of course, must necessarily have varied in varying soils. Thus it is, in the few early records in which comparative calculations are made, we have the carucate assessed in one and the same Record at rates varying from one to two hundred acres, according to the locality. “ Land,” says Sir F. Palgrave, “ was measured by a compromise between superficial extent and productive value. Instead of trund¬ ling the theodolite, they yoked the oxen, and sped the plough. The carucate ’ consisted of so much land as the ploughshare could furrow in the course of the season; the half-drowned plashes which sunk beneath the tread, or the soil studded with jutting rocks, where the husbandman could not turn up the glebe, were no portion of the plough-land. The bents and sedges where the ox could not feed, were excluded from the ox-gang ( Bovata ). The ridges and balks over which the scythe could not mow the grass, were not reckoned in the day-math, and, generally speaking, no land uncultivated, at the time of the Domesday survey, was included in the calculation of the hides. Hence the very unequal admeasurement of the plough¬ land, carucate, or hide, in subsequent times, when, by usage, it be¬ came a regular sum total of acreage : the same denomination of measure, a ‘ Hide-la/nd,’ or its synonyms, being applied to 60, 80, 100, 112, 120, or 150 acres.” (‘History of Normandy and Eng¬ land,’ vol. iv. 60.) These observations of Sir Francis Palgrave are equally applicable to the smaller denominations of measurement. Thus, it is very dif¬ ficult to pronounce with anything like precision what the real mea¬ sure of the “ jugum ” was. Like the admeasurement of the larger quantities, it varied, probably with the locality and soil,—and, la¬ bour as we will, we cannot hope to obtain more than an approxima¬ tion to the truth. > NOTES. 101 Jugum. If we translate the word “jugum” literally, we obtain "yoke” as the result, and may suppose, therefore, that, generally speaking, it represents as much land as a yoke of oxen, i. e. two beasts, would cultivate in a year,—always adding in the amount of land necessary for their pasture and support; for in calculations of land thus ad¬ measured, this is always a necessary element. Now, as we shall find when we come to speak of a team, the full plough-team for the heaviest lands consisted of eight oxen, i. e. four yokes. We may, therefore estimate one yoke of oxen, as a quarter of a team,—and this seems to help us much in arriving at a correct conclusion as to the quantity of land supposed to be represented by the term "jugum” or "yoke.” At p. 12,1. 39, Extension (Translation, p. 101, 1. 37), under the manor of Pitefiam, we have Be hoc manerio tenent Godefridus et Ni- gellus de Archiepiscopo uwum Solin et dimidium et jugum. I. e. “ Of this manor, Godefridus and Nigellus hold, of the Archbishop, one suling and a half, and a yoke.” “ Jugum,” a “ yoke,” therefore, is less than half a suling. At p. 41, 1.1, Extension (Translation, p. 130, last line), wo have : Adeloldus tenuit de episcopo Bene. Fro wno Solin sc'defend'd. . . . Be isto Solino tenet Radulfus de Curbespine Jugum et dimidium. . . . Adeloldus habuit dimidium Solin et dmadiwm Jugum. I. e. “ Adelold held, .of the Bishop, Dene. It answers for one Suling. . . . Of that Suling, Ralph de Curbespiue holds one yoke and a half. . . . Ade¬ lold had half a Suling and half a yoke.” According to this entry, then, four yokes were equal to one suling. Again, p. 50, 1. 1, Extension (Translation, p. 141, 1. 1), we have : Hugo de Montfort tenet urmm mamerium, Estwelee, quod tenuit Fre¬ deric de R'ege E. Et pro uno solin se defend'd. Triajuga sunt infra dmisionem Hugonis, et qua/rtum jugum est extra. Here, again, it is distinctly evidenced, that the “jugum,” or “ yoke,” was one-fourth of a suling. Now, if the suling, as its name imports, be identical with " caru- cata ” (Sul, according to Bosworth, is a plough, and Sulung a plough¬ land, as much land as could be tilled with one plough), we confirm our conjecture that a “ yoke of oxen ” constituted a quarter of a full team,—and may fairly conjecture that a yoke (jugum) of land was one-quarter of a carucate or suling, each of these latter representing as much land as one plough could till in the year, with the addition of such quantity as might be necessary for the pasturage and suste¬ nance of the animals. At p. 7, 1. 31, Extension (Translation, p. 97, 1. 25), there is a passage which, as far as the locality there described is concerned, will enable us to reduce these measurements to actual acres. “In commmmi terra Sancti Martini, sunt cccc acrce et dimidia, quce fiunt ij solinos et dimidium .” I. e. " In the common land of St. Martin there are four hundred acres and a half, which make two sulings and a half.” By which it appears that, near Doveb, the suling, in round numbers, was equal to 160 acres; and, if our preceding conjectures be correct, a jugum or yoke there, on the same principle, would have equalled about 40 acres. The number of oxen required in one plough must necessarily have varied,—four oxen in some soils being sufficient for a plough or team, which in others would require eight, according to the soil on which they worked. The subject will be found fully discussed in a future note on the terms Garuca and Gantcata. (45.) Extension, p. 4,1. 1,—" Habuerwnt isti Sacham et Socam." Translation, p. 94,1. 13,—" These had Sacha and Soca." Lords who The franchise of Sacha and Soca is fully discussed in Note 7 and and Soca in ’ n -^-PP en d lx IV. With respect, however, to these great lords, it thk Laths may be well to append a note from Kelharn, p. 249 :— and^Ayles “ these must have been military thanes, and held their lands ford. by military service, for Sacha and Soca, a liberty and privilege to try causes, with a peculiar jurisdiction between the lord and tenants, or his men and tenants, as the words import, was, and is, a most certain argument of dominion and seignurie, which was first ob¬ tained from the prince, and an infallible mark of military service due from him that enjoyed it,—and an obligation upon him to per¬ form it.” (Brady’s Hist. p. 69.) Brady’s view as to the knight-service of those who had the fran - chise of Saca and Soca is somewhat confirmed by the passage (Ex¬ tension, p. 3,1. 23, and Translation, p. 93, 1. 46): Et de ter ris eorum liabet relevamen qui habent suam sacam et socam. And from the lands of those who have their own Saca and Soca he has relief; i. e. he can claim a Heriot, for such is the meaning of “Relevamen” in this passage. (See Notes 33 and 36.) (46.) Extension, p. 4,1. 8,—" Terra cmionicorum Sancti Martini." Translation, p. 94,1,17,—“ The Lands of the Canons of St. Martin’s." Here are entered in the Survey, in long detail, all the prebends Priory of belonging to St. Martin’s Priory. They are given with such sin- ® T ‘ Maetik gular minuteness and exactness, as to excite a suspicion of favouritism in the Commissioners. Perhaps they were hospitably lodged at the Priory, during the period of their sojourn at Dover, and had more leisure and opportunities for examining records there than they had in their visits to other districts; however this may be, the Prior and Canons of St. Martin seem to have exercised some paramount in¬ fluence over them. To this assertion, the first three pages, of the ‘Domesday Survey’ bear conclusive testimony. No individual te¬ nant, in any part of the Survey,—no other religious house—had their possessions, actual or supposititious, and their claims, how¬ ever slight might be the foundation on which they rested, so mi¬ nutely recorded as those of St. Martin. Every individual prebend, every wrong or robbery inflicted upon them by Norman or Saxon violator, is recorded in fullest detail. Indeed, these first three pages of the Survey demand something more than a mere passing remark; and we may safely assert that, at least, the claims of the Priory of St. Martin, and the rights and franchises of the men of Dover were not overlooked by the Commissioners. Although hardly becoming the gravity of an historical research, I cannot resist the introduction here of a little anecdote relative to another body of travelling Commissioners, the recollection of which, perhaps, first caused my suspicions of the friendly attentions flowing from the hospitalities of St. Martin’s. Nearly fifty years ago, when certain Commissioners were travel¬ ling through the kingdom, charged with an investigation of various public trusts, I was on a visit to the Encumbent of a very large parish, endowed with more than one of these foundations. My friend’s wine- cellar happened to be stored with some marvellously fine port, which had been sent as a present from a nunnery in Oporto to a titular Archbishop of Cashel, who had had the charge of the Roman Ca¬ tholics in that district. At his death, my friend had purchased this wine, and, in commemoration of its former owner, familiarly desig¬ nated it by the name of “ The Archbishop.” The two Commis¬ sioners came in due course to visit my friend’s parish, and were hospitably entertained at his table,—•“ The Archbishop” adding largely to its fascinations. Towards the close of the evening, my friend asked the Commissioners, how many long years their investi¬ gation was likely to occupy them. " I cannot tell exactly,” replied one of them (who still survives, and retains in age all the sociable cheerfulness of his youth); " but I will take good care that it lasts as long as the Archbishop.” I cannot divest myself of the idea that some similar attraction retained long our Domesday Commissioners at the Priory of St. Martin, to their own comfort and the benefit of all posterity. But, to return to graver reflections. This minute and exact detail of their possessions evidences a conviction on the part of the Priory, that the Conqueror’s survey was made, not so much for the purpose of enriching his coffers by taxation, as to re¬ store right to the injured, and to ensure to all a secure title to their possessions, by a careful investigation and registration of their lawful claims. (47.) Extension, p. 4, 1. 10,—“ xxi Solin." Translation, p. 94, 1. 18,—“ Twenty-one Sulings." In Note 44,1 have already expressed my belief, that the " Solinus” Soling. — Suling —was identical with the Carucata, the plough-land. Kel- StJLI ^ G ~ ham is of the same opinion. In his ‘ Domesday Book Illustrated,’ p. 337, he says:— “ Solinus, Solin, Suling, Swolling. This word is peculiar to Kent, and is supposed, in general, to contain the same quantity of land as a carucate 162 NOTES. or plough-land. Terrain trium aratrorum quam Qantiani Anglice dicmt, three Swolinges. Som. Gav. 58,117. Cowell.” + m Extension, p. 4, 1. 10,— “In Hmdredo de Cornell/.” Translation, p. 94, 1. 19,— “In the Hundred of Comely.” Hundred. Tug name of Hundred here first occurs in our Survey, and neces¬ sarily calls for a few observations, though but few additions can be made to the volumes that have been written upon the subject, all, however, ending in little more than conjecture. Mr. Thorpe, in his ‘ Glossary to the Anglo-Saxon Laws, 5 writes thus:— “ Hundred, a subdivision of the country the nature of which is not known with certainty. In the ‘ Dialogus de Scaecario,’ it is said that a Hundred, ex lydarum aliquot centenariis, sed non determinalis, constat; quidam enim ex pluribus, quidam ex paucioribus constat (/. e. the Hundred consists of some centenaries of Hides, not, however, any determinate number, for one consists of more, and another of fewer). Some accounts make it consist of precisely a hundred hides, others of a hundred tithings, or of a hundred free families. Certain it is that, whatever may have been its original organization, the hundred, at the period when it became known to us, differed greatly as to extent in the several parts of England. This division is ascribed to King Alfred, and he may possibly have introduced it into England, though in Germany it dates from a very remote period, where it was established among the Franks in the sixth century. In the Capitularies of Charlemagne we meet witli it in the form known among us.” (See Capit. lib. iii. c. 10, et passim.) “ To Alfred’s claim as the author of this division in England it may be objected that the 1 hundred ’ is named in the Penitential of Ecgbert; but this objection is not fatal. It is there mentioned in the rubric only, to which it seems attached as an afterthought, and does not appear in the text, between which and the rubric there is little accordance; and, more¬ over, it is evident from its dialect that the Penitential has not reached us in its original state, being bereft of every vestige of its Northumbrian origin, and, in its present dress, is most probably much later than the time of Alfred. “ An interesting schedule, in Saxon, of the Hundreds of Northampton¬ shire is given in (Ellis’s) ‘Introduction to Domesday,’ vol. i. p. 185.” (Thorpe, vol. ii. * Glossary,’ in verbo.) In introducing this schedule. Sir Henry Ellis observes:— “ In a very ancient Leiger-book of Peterborough Abbey, preserved in the Library of the Society of Antiquaries, is the following enumeration of the Hundreds of Northamptonshire, and their contents, referring to the time of King Edward the Confessor, in which every Hundred is made to con¬ sist of a hundred hides; the hides paying geld being particularly dis¬ tinguished from those in the royal occupation, and the waste or unculti¬ vated land.” In an earlier part of the same introduction, Sir Henry Ellis ob¬ serves :— “ The names of the Hundreds in the respective counties have undergone a great change.' 1 ' An observation which we shall find, as we proceed, to be specially applicable to Kent. (See Appendix XVIII.) (49.) Extension, p. 4, 1. 14 ,—“ Ercmt prehendte communes.” Translation, p. 94, 1. 22 ,—“ The prebends were in common.” Prebends This would seem to signify that the prebends belonging to the of St. Mae- p r j or y 0 f St. Martin were held as the common stock of the esta¬ blishment, the produce being evenly divided among the brethren, as was the case, till recently, with the Chapter of Canterbury. The Bishop of Baieux alters this arrangement, and assigns to each par¬ ticular brother his particular prebend. It is difficult to understand by what authority he effected this change, though there is no difficulty in gathering from the subsequent details that his own personal in¬ terests were advanced thereby; in fact, this was another specimen of his spoliations. But, if our interpretation of this passage be correct, how happens it that, in the enumeration of the prebends, individuals are named as holders of individual prebends in the time of the Confessor, which apparently contradicts the statement that they were then held in common ? I cannot see how we are to get over the difficulty in any other way than by supposing that the holders were not themselves Canons of St. Martin’s but tenants of the Canons. Of course, there was nothing to preclude a Canon from being himself a tenant, but then Prebends ho was tenant of the body corporate of the priory, and did not hold Mae ' in demesne, as it were, his own specific prebend. This explanation, when compared with the context, is, I confess, far from satisfactory; but, without some such explanation, there is palpably a contradic¬ tion between the statement that the prebends were in common in the time of the Confessor, and the assertion afterwards that individuals held particular prebends at that period. (See Appendix XIX.) ( 50 .) Extension, p. 4, 1. 17,— “Tenet i Mcmennm.” Translation, p. 94,1. 25,— “ Holds one Manor.” It is important that we here define the characteristics of an ancient Manebium. Manor, limiting our inquiries as much as possible to the period of the Domesday Survey:— “ Manors,” says Sir Henry Ellis, “ although in substance, perhaps, as ancient as the Saxon constitution, are considered by our best writers on English antiquities as of Norman introduction. Dugdale says the reign of Edward the Confessor is the first in which they are mentioned, a cir¬ cumstance which is easily accounted for by the fondness of Edward for Norman institutions. “ Tenuit de rege H. pro manerio (i. e. He held it of King Edward as a manor) occurs frequently in the early part of the Survey. The name is either from the French manoir, or from the Latin manendo, as the usual residence of the owner on his land. (Sir H. Ellis, ‘ Introduction to Domes¬ day,’ vol. i. p. 224.) Cruise, in accordance with all other writers, assigns the same ety¬ mology to the word “ manor.” ‘‘Every estate of this kind had a capital mansion on it, as of which, the “ lands granted out to the tenants were held; and, being the residence of “the lord, it was called, in old French, manoir, a manendo, from which the “ whole acquired the name of ‘ manor.’ ” (See Cruise on ‘ Dignities,’ p. 24.) Whatever the etymology of the word may have been, the entries in the Survey prove that, whether the Lord actually resided or not, he reserved a portion of the lands of the manor to his own use, and these were called the Demesne Lands, or the Inland of the Manor. The rest were apportioned among the tenants, called “Villani,” i. e. the tenants of the Lord of the “ Ville,” whose rent was paid chiefly in agricul tural services, “Bordarii,” and other descriptions of tenants, of whom we will speak in the proper place. The manor was essentially a seignory, or lordship, and if the Lord had the franchise of Sac and Soc, he held the pleas of his tenants in his own court. Cruise, indeed, asserts that, “ in all the grants made by the Con- “ queror and his sons, to be held of the Crown in capite, a civil and “ criminal jurisdiction was always given.” He afterwards adds, with regard to this jurisdiction, “ This Court, “ in which the Lord of a Manor exercised his jurisdiction, was called “ Curia BarOnis, the Court Baron j” and cites Lord Coke, in assert¬ ing that these Court Barons were as ancient as manors themselves, and that, in them, the Lords had power to “redress misdemeanors “ within their precincts, punish offences committed by their tenants, “ and decide and debate controversies arising within their jurisdic- “ tion.” (See Cruise on 1 Dignities,’ p. 24.) Many instances occur in the Survey of Submanors holding of the principal manors, and though not actually called manors, the holders are entered as having their lands in demesne, and villans under them, which at once gives them a manorial character. It is, in fact, evident, from the entries in the Survey, that all actual owners of lands held these lands almost always as manors, and necessarily held of some mesne Lord, if not in chief of the King. Before the passing of the Statute entitled Quia Emptores, a.d. 1290, “ Any man that was possessed of freehold lands of inheritance might have converted them into a manor whenever he pleased, by granting two or more portions of them to two or more other persons, to be kolden to them and their heirs for ever, of him and his heirs for ever, either by the tenure of military service, or in free and common socage.” (Baron Maseres. See Appendix XX.) This usage will readily account for the existence of a very large amount of manors which we knew to have existed in the twelfth and thirteenth centu- NOTES. 108 Manebium. ries, several often within the limits of a singlo parish, but which are utterly unnoticed in the Domesday Survey. They, had been carved out, in fact, from the head manors during those two centuries. With regard to this practice of subinfeudation, Blackstone makes the following remarks:— “In the early times of legal constitution, the King’s greater barons, "who had a large extent of territory held under the Crown, granted out “ frequently smaller manors to inferior persons to be holden of themselves. "... In imitation whereof these inferior Lords began to carve out and “ grant to others still more minute estates to be held as of themselves, and “ were so proceeding downwards in infinitum, till the superior Lords ob- “ served that, by this method of subinfeudation, they lost all their feodal “ profits of wardships, marriages, and escheats, which fell into the hands of “those mesne or middle Lords, who were the immediate superiors of the “ terre-tenant, or him who occupied the land; and also, that the mesne Lords “ themselves were so impoverished thereby that they were disabled from “ performing their services to their own superiors. This occasioned, first, “ that provision in the thirty-second chapter of £ Magna Carta,’ 9 Hen. III. “ which is not to be found in the first Charter granted by that Prince nor “ in the great Charter of King John, viz. that no man should either give or “ sell his land, without reserving sufficient to answer the demand of his “ lord; and afterwards the Statute of W estmiuster, 3, or Quia Employes, “ IS Edw. I. c. 1, which directs that upon all sales or feoffments of land, “ the feoffee shall hold the same, not of his immediate feoffor, but of the “ chief Lord of the fee, of whom such feoffor himself held it.” (See Black- stone’s * 1 Commentaries,’ p. 91.) In the Introduction to the 1 Domesday of St. Paul’s/ my kind and amiable friend Archdeacon Hale has furnished us with a most learned, and yet most lucid and popularly described account of the state of manors and their Lords at the time of the Conquest, and, the two succeeding centuries, that, were I to follow my own inclination, I would gladly, with his permission, transfer the whole to these pages; but it may not be: I can only presume to copy a few of the most illustrative passages here,—adding, perhaps, a few in the Appendix,—with a regret that the whole had not been left to his master-hand, before I ventured to touch the subject. “ Manorial property,” be observes, “ was a possession differing in many respects from what is now called landed estate. It was not a breadth of land which the Lord might cultivate, or not, as he pleased, suffer it to be inhabited, or reduce it to solitude or waste; but it was a dominion or em¬ pire, within which the Lord was superior over subjects of different ranks, his power over them not being absolute, but limited by law and custom. The Lord of a Manor, who had received, by grant from the Crown, Saca and Soca, Tol and Team, etc., was not merely a proprietor, but a prince ; and his Courts were not only courts of law, but, frequently, of criminal justice. The demesne, the assised, and the waste lands were his; but the usufruct of the assised lands belonged, on conditions, to the tenants; and the waste lands were not so entirely his, that he could exclude the tenants from the use of them. It was this double capacity, in which the Lord stood to his tenants, as the arbiter of their rights, as well as the owner of the land, which rendered it necessary to the due discharge of the duty of his station! that the Lord of a Manor should be such a person as Fleta describes,— book ii. cap. 71, § 2,—“ Truthful in his words, faithful in Ms action’s, a lover of justice and of God, a hater of fraud and wrong ; since it most con¬ cerns him not to act with violence, or according to his own will, lut, to follow advice, not being guided bg some young hanger-on, some jester or flatterer ; but by the opinion of persons learned in the laic,—men faithful and honest, of much experience. Manors were petty royalties; the court and household of the Lord resembling, in some degree, that of the King. In Fleta 1 (ii. § 2-18) an account is given of the officers of the royal household, the Senescallus Hospitii Regis, who held his court in the palace, the Mares- callus, the Camerarius, the Clericus coquina;, and Clericus panetarii; but, m the latter part of the book, which treats of the management of Manors, we find the Lord of the Manor attended by the Senescallus, who held his Courts, by the Marescallus, who had the charge of his stud, and by the Coquus, who rendered an account of the daily expenditure to the Senes- ca,lus .For tlie management of the legal business of a Manor, the collection of the revenue, and the cultivation of the demesne, the Lord required three officers,—the Senescallus, the Ballivus, and the Propositus. .appears, then, that a Manor was both a seignory, and also a farm ; a seignory, as respected the occupiers of the lands held by the pay¬ ment of services, rents, reliefs, and heriots; and a farm, as respected the demesne lands; the senescallus, or steward, being the representative of the Of course, m these cases the Lord of the Manor mast have been actually resident, eta wrote, be it remembered, nearly two centuries after the time of Domesday, and in l Ln?, m ireow (*. e. his slave). 1 The Christian clergy, indeed, did all they could to mitigate its hardships, but when has even Christianity itself been triumphant over the selfishness and the passions of the mass of men ? “ In [the] contemplation of [the] law, in fact, the slave is the absolute property of his lord, a chattel to be disposed of at the lord’s pleasure, and having a value only for the benefit of the lord, ‘or of some public authority in his place. The serf cannot represent himself or others: his interests must be guarded by others, for he himself has no standing in any public court. He is not in any frifiborh, or association for mutual guarantee, for he has nothing of his own to defend, and no power to defend what another has. If he be slain by a stranger, his lord claims the damages, and not his children : if the lord himself slay him, it is but the loss of so much value, —a horse, an ox, gone—more or less. 1 Out of his death no feud can arise, for the relatives who allowed him to fall into, or remain in slavery, have renounced the family bond. . . . “ But yet there was a gleam of hope: one solitary ray that made even the surrounding darkness tolerable, and may have cheered the broken¬ hearted serf through years of unrequited toil and suffering. The law that reduced him to slavery made it also possible that he should be restored to freedom. It did not shut from him this blessing, however distant it might seem.It was the especial honour and glory of Christianity, that, while it broke the spiritual bonds of sin, it ever actively laboured to relieve the heavy burthen of social servitude. We are distinctly told that Bishop Wilfrifi, on receiving the grant of Selsey from Csedwealha of Wessex, im¬ mediately manumitted two hundred and fifty unfortunates, whom he found there attached to the soil,—that those, whom by baptism he had rescued from servitude to devils, might, by the grant of liberty, bo rescued from servitude to man. (Bed. H. E., iv., 13.) Iu this spirit of charity, the clergy obtained respite from labour for the Jieow (the slave) on the Sab¬ bath, on certain high festivals, and on the days which preceded or followed them. (Laws of Wihtrasd, 9, 10—Thorpe, voL i. p. 30 ; Laws of Ine, 3, p. 105 ; Laws of Edward and Guthrum, 7, p. 171; Laws of Ethelred, viii. 2, p. 337). “ The Lord wdio compelled his }>eow (slave) to labour between the sunset on Saturday and the sunset on Sunday forfeited him altogether. (Laws of Ine, 3—Thorpe, i. p. 105).to their merciful intervention it must also be ascribed, that the will of a Saxon proprietor, laic as well as clerical, so constantly directs the manumission of a number of serfs, for the soul's heal of the testator. .“ From what has been already cited, it must be evident that there was a constantly growing tendency in favour of freedom, that the clergy suggested every motive, and the law made every possible effort, at least to diminish the more grievous circumstances of servitude. It is, moreover, to be borne in mind, that a very large proportion of the Jieowas (slaves), at any given time, were, in reality, criminal serfs—convicts expia¬ ting their offences by their sufferings. “ Taking all the circumstances into consideration, I am disposed to think, that the mere material condition of the unfree population was not necessarily, or generally, one of great hardship. It seems doubtful whe¬ ther the labour of the serf was practically more severe, or the remuneration much less, than that of an agricultural labourer in this country at this day: his lord was bound to feed him for his own sake, and if, when old and worn out, he wished to rid himself of a useless burthen, he could by an act of emancipation, hand over his broken-down labourer to the care of a Church which, with all its faults, never totally lost sight of the Divine pre¬ cepts of charity. We are not altogether without the means of judging as to the condition of the serf, and the provision made for him. Although the instances which we may cite are not all, either of one period, or one .country, or, indeed, derived from compilations having the authority of law, they show sufficiently what opinion was entertained on this subject among the ruling classes. In the prose version of Salomon and Saturn, it is said, that every serf ought to receive yearly seven hundred and thirty loaves, that is, two loaves a day, beside morning meals and noon meals; this can¬ not be said to be a very niggardly portion. Again, the valuable document entituled, Bectitudines singularum personarum, gives details respecting the allowances made to the serfs in various prsedial or domestic capacities, which would induce a belief, not only that they were tolerably provided for, but even enabled, by the. exertion of skill and industry, to lay up funds of their own towards the purchase of their freedom, the redemption of their children, or the alleviation of their own poverty.” (‘ Saxons iu England,’ vol. i. pp. 193 to 215.) 1 But soe p. 176, infra, the note from Bracton, cited by Sir II. Ellis. 174 NOTES. Sebti. It is difficult to pass over without remark tlie suggestion here made by Kemble that the “ Servus” of tbe time of which we are speaking was, after all, in no worse position than is tbe agricultural labourer of the present day. The experience of nearly half a century in watching over the privations and hardships and sufferings of this class, enables me to confirm the assertion,—ay, to the very letter. The agricultural labourer is, to all intents and purposes, a slave; though happily, ignorant of his bondage. The very Poor Laws of which we make our national boast, are often converted into engines to rivet his fetters. Removing all conscientious responsibility from the employer (according to his own interpretation of them), the heart even of many an otherwise benevolent man becomes as it were steeled against the labourer who, when his master fails him, can claim parochial relief; the employer feels that the man is not destitute, for the entire parish is bound to maintain him; upon them lies the responsibility, not upon himself. Even under the immense changes that have been made in the Poor Laws by recent Acts of Parliament, mitigation of this evil there is none; nay, the hand of the oppressor, should any such arise, is rather strengthened than otherwise. In proof of the correctness of this assertion, I will state a few facts that have come under my own observation. The first case that I shall adduce was one that occurred during the existence of the old Poor Law system. A hard-working man, with a numerous family dependent on him for maintenance, applied to the oc¬ cupier of a large farm for employment, asking the then market price of daily labour for his wages. The farmer offered half this amount, which was at once very naturally refused, as insufficient to keep the unfortu¬ nate applicant from starvation. The only reply he received was, “Then, you can go to the workhouse.” The poor fellow, of necessity, applied for parochial relief. It was granted him because it could not, in his circumstances, be legally refused; but the hard-hearted employer of labour summoned him before the magistrates for the offence of throwing himself and his family upon the parish, when he might have obtained employment, had he chosen to take it, and he was committed to prison accordingly. It is difficult to conceive any part of the bondage endured by the ancient “ Servus” as more complete slavery than this. Assuredly, the former was in the best position of the two. Another case I will name, as having occurred since the “ amend¬ ment,” as it is called, of the Poor Laws. A poor labouring man was attacked by sickness, and disabled from work. On applying to the Board of Guardians for relief, his petition was rejected, on the plea that his family was not sufficiently numerous to entitle him to parochial assistance. From his employer he could get nothing but “ Go to the relieving officer.” This official could only report from the Board, that there was no hope of his being allowed relief in his own home; that, if any were given him, it must be in the Union House, to which, in that case, he must be removed, with his wife and children, not to live together there, but the wife parted from her husband, and the children from their parents,—their home, meanwhile, broken up, and their little miser¬ able furniture seized and sold from them by the parish. There was no resource but the miserable prospect of the Union House, or such alms for immediate relief as the minister of the parish could give or procure for him from the charitable; his employer,meanwhile, revelling in the abundance of a large farm, and sheltering himself under the hy¬ pocritical subterfuge that the duty of relieving his disabled workman rested with the parish, not with himself, and that if the poor fellow was pitilessly driven from pillar to post, the law alone was to blame. No “ Servus” of old could have fallen into this state of helpless wretchedness, for his lord was bound to feed and maintain him in sickness and in health. But the days of chivalry have passed away; and, instead of the generous impulses which (notwithstanding the tyranny natural to almost boundless power) moved the lordly owner of countless manors towards his dependants and serfs, we have the agricultural population almost entirely in the employ and power of individuals, any one of whom, if he happen to be selfish and hard-hearted,—deeming the acquisition of money to be the sole object of life,—may display this hateful spirit to his poor, helpless workman, as in the instance cited above. In justice, however, to the employers who have come under my own cognizance, I gladly assert that such instances as those which I have adduced are of very rare occurrence. My only object has been to illustrate the comparative positions of the ancient “ Servus” Servi. and the agricultural labourer of the present -day, and to show that the machinery is still extant to make the latter the worse of the two. Tn one respect, the appointment of a Board of Guardians to take care of the poor operates banefully against them, inasmuch as it saves the conscience of the ratepayer or overseer, by transferring all responsibility to a body of men unknown, individually, to the poor of any parish, and therefore they are secure in their exemption from personal censure and the reproaches of their suffering parishioners. The conscience of a corporation is prover¬ bially of a most elastic nature ; any one individual among them, if it be his inclination to do so, may boast in public of his charitable and benevolent disposition;—forgetting his exactions and niggardly treatment of his own labourers, and the scenes which occur between him and these his dependants at home; he may attend public meet¬ ings, and advocate eloquently the cause of the poor, thereby obtain¬ ing an influential and popular name; but follow this individual to his seat at the Board, whero the character that he has acquired by his public display of sympathy for the poor gives him great authority and power, and these he now uses in precisely an opposite direction to that which might naturally have been expected from him. Here, at the Board, there is no stern-heartedness, no mean evasion, of which he is incapable. Here he can throw the responsibility upon others, without injuring his own popularity. He will here relentlessly rivet the chains of the poor, and return home with tears in his eyes, bewailing the sternness of the law which has compelled him to a cruel and adverse decision, and forbad the indulgence of all the kindlier feelings of his nature. Let me not be supposed to be casting reproach on the parties usually constituting these Boards. Such cases as that which I have adduced are of very rare occurrence; but being fully cognizant of the truth of this one (albeit the existence of such a contemptible character is hardly credible), I record it here as evidence of Kemble’s assertion that the “ Servus” in f Domesday’ was not subjected to greater hardships than may sometimes be inflicted on the agricultural labourer of the present day; and as proof that prodigious power of persecution and tyranny over the poor is still left, should any evil-minded, artful, designing individual, like the one that I have put forth, devote himself, by duplicity and dissimulation, to the acquisition of such influence and power, as enable him to reduce the agricultural labourer to a state of serfdom more intolerable than that of the ancient “ Servus.” The machinery is there, and the wicked will use it; though, happily, men capable of such iniquity are rarely to be found. If we may judge of the real feelings of the “ Servus” of the Saxon period by comparing it with those frequently exhibited by the actual slave of the present day, in countries where slavery is recognized, we may well suppose that their sense of bondage did not lie heavily upon them. Again and again I have been told by those long i-esi- dent in Turkey and Egypt, that if an offer of freedom be made to the slave, he is reluctant to accept it, and feels far happier under the shelter and protection of his master than he can expect to be, if sent forth to the world free, to form such connection and earn such liveli¬ hood as his new state of freedom might permit. After all, is not the following the ethical elucidation of that which to ordinary minds appears a singular and unaccountable fatuity ? The free labourer, as he calls himself, enters into a contract with his master, each naturally striving to make the best terms in his power; and, in forming this contract, the employer has a fearful advantage over the individual seeking employment, in the threat of the work- house to one unwilling to accept his terms. The contract concluded,the labourer makes the best he can of his bargain; his heart is not with his employer; all his care is to spare his strength as much as possible, and to do no more work than can be rigidly required of him. The master, on the other hand, is ever fretting and fumi ng at being badly served; there is constant hostility between them, and no bond of affection can ever bind them together. Nay, more, when the labourer of the present day, free man as he deems himself to be, is treated with a tyranny that makes his.service to his master little else than actual bondage, assuredly “the iron enters into his soul” with keener pang than any ever felt by the man who knows himself to be nothing but a Slave. Now, take the case of the real “ Servus.” There is no money NOTES. 175 Servo bargain between him and bis master, to engender doubts and jea¬ lousies ; the mere impulse of human nature induces the master to • have a feeling of compassion for the being that is entirely in bis power. Thence ensues much kindness,—never thrown away upon, the friendless,—the slave feels that he has a friend and protector in his master, and therefore attaches himself strongly to him. A mutual affection and regard hence springs up between them.—Verily, "there still remaineth a Soul of good amidst things evil.” In exemplification of this, let us here recall two instances that occur in Holy Writ. First, that touching passage from the Second Book of Kings, chap, v.:— “Now Naaman, captain of the host of the King of Syria, was a great man with his master, and honourable, because, by him the Lord had given deliverance unto Syria; he was ako a mighty man in valour, but he was a leper. And the Syrians had gone out by companies, and had brought away captive out of the land of Israel a little maid; and she waited on Naaman’s wife. And she said unto her mistress, would God my lord were with the prophet that is in Samaria! for he would recover him of his leprosy. And one went in and told his lord, saying, thus and thus said the maid that is of the land of Israel. And the King of Syria said, Go to, go, I will send a letter unto the King of Israel.” Here, assuredly, is most touching and resistless evidence that the captive maid of Israel had been treated kindly by her mistress, for whom, in return, she felt a tender interest. Take, again, the tale of the lordly centurion, in the Gospel (Luke vii. 2), whose servant (SouXo?— Slave) was “ Dear unto him, sick, and ready to die. And when he heard of Jesus, he sent unto him the elders of the Jews, beseeching him that he would come and heal his servant. And, when they came to Jesus, they besought him instantly, saying that he was worthy for whom he should do this, for he loveth our nation and hath built us a synagogue.” Their prayer is at once heard— “ And they that were sent, returning to the house, found the servant whole that had been sick.” Here is another instance of the affection subsisting between a master and his slave—“he was dear unto him.” The former, a man high in authority and of lordly power, full of love and compassion for his servant, and sparing no pains to see him restored to health. Contrast the conduct of this centurion with the heartless reply of the master to his labourer, as cited above,'—“Do not pester me; go to the relieving officer,”—knowing all the time that this was mere mockery, it not being in the power of that official to grant any relief; and we may well cease to boast of what is called modern freedom, or to deceive ourselves with the idea that the position of the “ Slave” in ancient times was one of unmitigated misery, or that he suffered more hardships than the agricultural labourer of the present day. But it is time that I close this long digression. I should not have attempted it, had it not seemed to me of real historical importance that, in comparing the state of ancient serfdom with the so-called free labour of the present day, I should record the results of my own experience for the use of those who have never been behind the scenes, and, consequently, have little conception of what is daily passing unobserved around them,—even of the fact that the " Servus” still exists, however he may strive to conceal from himself the real position in which he passes his life. And now let us close these comparisons by reverting, once more, to Kemble’s elaborate discussion. To sum up their result, we gather that the “ Servus,”—or “Nativus,” as he is called in the Conqueror’s laws,—the “ ]>eow” of the Anglo-Saxons, had become a slave, either by the chances of war, or by sale or delivery into that state by those who had the legal power so to dispose of him,—or by his own voluntary sale of himself,—or as being the child or descendant of those who had, by any of those means, become slaves—and that there was always a hope before him of manumission. Having thus explained' the origin and prospects of the servile condition, we will say a few words as to the duties imposed upon the Servi on the demesne lands of the Manor:— “From the same authority” (the Bectitudmes) , says Kemble, “we may conclude that on an estate in general, serfs discharged the functions of Servi. ploughman, shepherd, goatherd, swineherd, oxherd, and cowherd, barn-mau, sower, hayward, woodward, dairymaid, and beadle or messenger. (See Ap¬ pendix XXIH). While the Geneat, Cotsetla, Gobur, Beocere, 1 and Gafol- swau, 2 were probably poor freemen, from whom a certain portion of labour could be demanded in consideration of their holdings, 3 or a certain rent (gafol) reserved out of the produce of the hives, flocks, or herds committed to their care: and these formed the class of the Lcet and Esne, 4 poor mer¬ cenaries, serving for hire or for their land, but not yet reduced to so low a scale as the ]>eow (the servus).” (‘ Saxons in England,’ vol. i. p. 215.) I cannot resist inserting here a most graphic picture of the tone of feeling incident to the life and occupations of the Servus, as disclosed to us most vividly in that interesting MS. called f -ZElfric(s Dialogue,’ for the publication of which, in the ‘Analecta Anglo- Saxonica,’ we are deeply indebted to Mr. Thorpe. A Master is supposed to be questioning his scholars on their various occupation in life. Among the rest he asks— “ M. What do those your comrades know ? “ vas very gradually effected, and it is difficult to name the pi-ecise date or Council at which the prohibition from matrimony was finally and successfully established. The first Pope that forbad the Clergy to marry was Siricius, who died a.d. 399; but his injunctions were of little avail. Throughout the tenth and eleventh centuries there were Synods without end, repeating vainly the same ordinances,—all were disregarded. Gregory VII. (Hilde¬ brand) was, from the first, the most violent and determined oppo¬ nent of the marriage of Priests. At the very commencement of his Pontificate he assembled a Council at Rome, a.d. 1074, at which it was peremptorily decreed that the Clergy should abstain from matri¬ mony ; but the publication of this decree was fiercely opposed by the Priests, who excited great commotions thereon throughout Europe, and it was disobeyed to a great extent, especially in Noimandy and England. At the Council of Plaisance ( Placentmvm ) in 1095, and at numerous Councils and Synods that followed, the decree was again and again repeated,—and this assuredly proves the reluctance with which it was obeyed. At the Council of Rheims (Remense), A.D. 1119, it was deemed necessax-y again to repeat it. Ordericus Vitalis, who was probably present at this Council, gives us long and full details of all that passed there ; and, at the Synod of Rouen, in November of the same year, on the promulgation of this decree, the most violent com¬ motions ensued, instigated by the Priests and then- wives. “At that time,” says the biographer of St. Bernard, NOTES. 177 Celibacy of While upon the subject of the celibacy of the Clergy, I may be Clbbgf. allowed to state that very numerous charters have passed through my hands, proving that the marriage of Priests was of common occurrence in England during the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth centuries. It would be beside our purpose to prolong the discussion in these pages,—it belongs to an Ecclesiastical History, rather than to the subject of our labours. I have stated sufficient to satisfy us that we need not be staggered at the record of a Prebendary of St. Martin’s being a father T.R.E.,—and of his son’s succeeding him in his Prebend. (59.) Extension, p. 5,1. 3,—“ Et ibi dimidiam ca/rucam in dominio .” Translation, p. 95,1. 6,—“ And half a team there in demesne, and five bordars.” Doubtful In the unextended original it is thus—“ et ibi dimid car in dnio, Extension. e fc v bordj” and therefore, it is possible that these words should have been extended et ibi dimidia caruca in dominio, et v bordarii, and that they should have been translated thus,— and there is half a team there in demesne, and five bordcurs. But collating this entry with previous parallel passages, it seemed to me that they should be taken as the conclusion of the paragraph which precedes them, viz. habet dimidium solin in Gornilai hundredo, and that the habet of that • paragraph governs the entire'passage. ( 00 .) Extension, p. 5,1. 5,—“ Dimidium solin, et adhne xxv acras.” Translation, p. 95, 1. 8 ,—“Half a suling, and twenty-five acres besides. Acha. It may be well, on this first occurrence in our Survey of the term Acre, to assure ourselves as to its real measurement. From all the authorities to which I have had access, I conclude that the Acre of those days differed but imperceptibly from our modern Statute acre. Kemble (‘ Saxons in England,’ vol. i. p. 96) arrives at the same con¬ clusion—to which he is led by the following passage in HUlfric’s * Dialogue’ (edited by Mr. Thorpe in his ‘ Analecta Anglo-Saxonica’), whore the ploughman is made to say—“ Having yoked my oxen, and fastened my share and coulter, I am bound to plough every day a full acre or more.” “Now, experience proves that a plough drawn by oxen will hardly exceed this measure, upon average land, at the present day; an acre and a quarter would he a very hard day’s work for any ploughman under such circumstances. Hence, for all practical purposes, we may assume our actual acre not to differ very materially from the Anglo-Saxon.” And he repeats this assertion, vol. i. p. 492, as cited in Note 63, infra (p. 178). On this authority, we may consider the acra of the Survey as generally equivalent to our modem Statute acre. (61.) Extension, p. 5, 1. 17,—“ Tenet Willelmm Pictavensis dimidimi solin” etc. Translation, p. 93, 1. 22,—“ William of Poitiers holds half a suling,” etc. William of Poitiers. William of Poitiers, Archdeacon of Coventry, was the Con¬ queror’s Chaplain, and wrote a history of his life and actions, entitled ‘ Gesta Gulielmi Ducis Normannorum et Regis Anglorum.’ This history is in Duchesne’s Collection, ‘ Recueil des Historiens Normands.’ Some account of this William of Poitiers is given in ‘ Ordericus Yitalis,’ vol. ii., ed. London, 1853, as translated by Mr. Forester, p. 46:— “ He was by birth a Norman, being a native of the Town of Preaux, where his sister was Abbess of a Convent of Nuns, dedicated to S' Leger. He is called William of Poitiers, because in that city he drank deeply at the fountain of learning. Returning into his own country, he became eminent as the most learned of all his neighbours and fellow-students, and made himself useful to Hugh and Gislebert, Bishops of Lisieux, in eccle- William siastical affairs, as Archdeacon of that diocese. He had served with PolTIE “ s - courage in a military career before he took orders, fightiug bravely for his earthly sovereign, so that he was the better able to describe with precision the scenes of war, from having himself been present and encountered their perils. As ago came on, he devoted himself to seieuce and prayer, and was more capable of composing in prose or verse, than of preaching. ’ He frequently wrote clever and agreeable poems, adapted for recitation, sub¬ mitting them, without jealousy, to the correction of his juniors.” With regard to his history, Ordericus acknowledges that up to the period of which he was then writing, viz. a.d. 1071, he had been indebted to William of Poitiers for his materials:— “ I have briefly followed, in many parts, his narrative of King William and his adherents, without copying all he has written, or attempting to imitate his elegant style.” (62.) Extension, p. 5,1. 18,— “Dimidium solin zij acras minus.” Translation, p. 95, 1. 22,—“ Half a suling less twelve acres.” In many passages parallel to this there may well arise a question. Minus. whether the extension should not be xij acris minus, rather than xij acras minus; but, in the original here, it is decidedly acras. And, throughout the entire Survey of all the counties, in the majority of the instances where this form occurs, it is in the accusa¬ tive. Still there are many passages where it is written in the ablative, acris. In our Kent Domesday we have the following varieties:— Facsimile, p. 1% col. 2, 1. 18,—"dimid solin xij ac a s minus.” „ p. 5 b , col. 1,1. 30,—“ xxj lib, ij 08 solid minus.” ,, p. 8 b , col. 1, 1. 25,—“ c uiffi iij mini cu lxi cot hnt.” „ p. 9 a , col. 2, in margin,—“ p i solin dimidio iugo m.” „ p. 12 b , col. 1,1. 12,—“ij solins dimid iugu min.” ,, p. 12 b , col. 1,1. 14,—“iij solins lx ac“s miS.” ,, p. 13 a , col. 2,1. 5,—“un solin dimid uirga mini.” ,, p. 14 a , col. 1, 1. 9,—“ten dimid solin una uirga mini.” Among the ‘Pedes Finium’ of Kent, No. 108, 8 Jo., we have dis¬ tinctly this form in extenso, — quinque denarios, uno guadrante miwus. It is evident, therefore, that in these formulas the ancient scribes used the ablative and accusative indiscriminately. It is not for the scholar to pronounce either form to be erroneous, however fastidious he may be in his ideas of correct grammatical construction. (63.) Extension, p. 5,1. 21,—“ Tenet Adeloldus iij virgas.” Translation, p. 95, 1. 26,—“ Adelold holds tlvree virges.” Three questions arise here, viz.— Virga. 1st. Should virg be extended virga or virgata ? 2nd. Should it be rendered virge or virgate ? 3rd. What was the precise measurement of this quantity of land? 1. With regard to the first question, a reference to the original facsimile will be our best instructor. The word occurs twelve times in the Kent Survey, viz. at— Facsimile, p. l b , col. 2,1. 21,—“ Ten Adelold 9 iij uirg” (no mark of contraction). ,, p. 4 n , col. 1,1. 21,—“ Jacet in Limes dimid iugu et dimid uirga” (no mark of contraction). ,, p. 10% col. 1,1. 39,—“ Ten dimid solin et iij uirg 1 .” ,, p. 10% col. 2,1. 15,—“ Ibi e un iugu t?re et una uirga” (no mark of contraction). ,, p. 12% col. 2,1. 13,—“ Habet iij uirg 1 ¥re.” ,, p. 13% col. 1, 1. 47,—“ Ten dimid iug & dimid uirga.” „ p. 13% col. 2, 1. 6,—“Ten un solin dimid uirga miS” (no mark of abbreviation). ,, p. 13% col. 1,1. 15,—“Ten iij uirg 1 et dimid.” ,, p. 13% col. 1, 1. 19,—“Ten iij a iuga & dimid uirga” (no mark of abbreviation). 2 y 178 NOTES. Vibga. Facsimile, p. 13 b , col. 2,1. 30,—“ Ten qumdam femina j uirga.” „ p. 14“, col. 1,1. 9 ,—“ Ten dimid solin una uirga mi3.” „ p. 14°, col. 1, 1. 23 ,—“ Est una uirga tre in Suestone (no mark of abbreviation over uirga). From these examples, we may gather that virga is the proper extension of virg, not virgata. The 2nd, 4th, 7th, 12th examples indicate this most clearly,—the 4th and 12th most decisively. 2. The answer to the second question follows of necessity, viz. that virge is the proper rendering in English. 3. The third question, as to the precise measure of the virge, is involved in much doubt. I will adduce such instances of its occur¬ rence as may throw some light on the question, when taken in con¬ nection with their respective contexts :— (i.) Extension, p. 5,1. 21, the context is,— “ Tenet Adeloldus iij uirgas. Et ibi habet iij uillanos et viij bordarios cum j caruca.” (ii.) Extension, p. 14,1. 21,— “ Dimidium iugum et dimidia uirga. ... Ibi babet j carucam, et unum villanum, cum xviij bordariis, babentes j carucam et dimidiam.” (iii.) Extension, p. 38,1. 39,— “ Tenet dimidium solin et iij virgas et ibi babet in dominio j carucam et j villanum cum x bordariis, habentes j carucam.” (iv.) Extension, p. 41,1. 15,— “ Ibi est unum Jugum terra, et una uirga. Et ibi sunt iij villani. Yalet et valuit semper xv solidos.” (v.) Extension, p. 49,1. 13,— “ Habet iij virgas terre. Et ibi est in dominio j caruca, cum v bordariis.” (vi.) Extension, p. 50, 1. 47,— “ Tenet dimidium jugum et dimidiam virgam. . . . Terra est ad j carucam.” (vii.) Extension, p. 51,1. 6,— “ Tenet unum solin dimidia virga minus. Terra est iij carucarum. Ibi xiiij sochmanni habent iij earucas.” (viii.) Extension, p. 52,1. 15,— “Tenet iij virgas et dimidiam. . . . Ibi, modo unus villanus habet dimidiam carucam cum iij bordariis.” (ix.) Extension, p. 52,1. 19,— “ Tenet iij juga et dimidiam virgam. . . . Terra est iij carucarum. Ibi modo ij caruca; in dominio. Et xv villani, cum ix bordariis habent iij carucas et dimidiam.” (x.) Extension, p. 53,1. 30,— “ Tenet quaadam fcemina j virgam, valet iij solidos.” (xi.) Extension, p. 54,1. 9,— “ Tenet dimidium solin unam virgam minus. . . . Terra est v caruca¬ rum—In dominio sunt ij”. Et xxxj bordarii habent iij carucas.” (xii.) Extension, p. 54, 1. 23,— “ Est una virga terra in Suestone. ... Ibi modo est unus bordarius xij denarios reddens. T.B.E. valebat xxx denarios. Et post xviij. Modo, iij solidos.” (See Note 54, p. 171, supra, as to the proper meaning of the expression Yalet.) From these materials, let us see what inferences we can draw as to the true measurement of the Virge. But first, as a valuable guide to us in our investigations, I will here insert a few passages from Kemble’s ‘Saxons in England,’ vol. i. Appendix, p. 489 :— “ It is necessary to bear in mind, that the Hid is exclusively arable land, and that in the case where the number of Hides equalled the whole acre¬ age, there could have been neither forest, nor meadow, nor pasture. . . . Sometimes; these bear a very small proportion to the arable, and to the number of cattle owned,—a fact perhaps to be explained by the existence of extensive commons. “ Let us now endeavour to settle the amount, as well as the proportions of the Hid and its several parts. As I have said, the Hid consisted of four Virgates ,—the Virgate of four ferlings. (Erom fcower, four; Feorling, or Feorling, are similar formations, and denote a fourth, or farthing, in money or land, also in corn.) I do not give examples, because they may be found in every other entry in Domesday; but I may add that the gyld, or tax, payable to the King from the land, is based upon precisely the same calculation. The Hid paid 6 shillings (worth now about 18s. Gd.), the Virgate Is. 6<7., and the ferling or 4 \d. . . . Now, if we can obtain the value of any one of these denominations, we can calculate all the rest with security. The value of the Virga, of Tardland, we can obtain,—it consisted of ten Norman agri, acra, or acres , perhaps eight, or eight and a third Saxon. “In the Exeter Domesday, fol. 48 (vol. iii. p. 42), we find ten hydes of VinoA. land to be made up of the following parcels: “4 hides + 1 virg + 10 agri, + 5h hides, + 4 agri. 1 Then 10 h. = 9b h. + 1 v. + 10 a. Or 10—9b h. = 1 v. + 10 a. Or j h. = 1 v. + 10 a. But | h. = 2 v. .-. 2 v. = 1 v. + 10 a. 2-1 v. =10 a. .-. 1 v. = 10 agri. But 1 hyd = 4 virg = 1G ferling. 1 hyd = 40 acres = 33| Saxon. 2 1 ferl. = 2\ acres = 2^ Saxon. “It will now be seen why I have given a column in which the whole acreage was measured by a calculation of forty acres to the Hid. ... I do not believe that one ager was less than half a ferling. It was either more than half a ferling, or equal to it. But half a ferling = lb Norman acre, which is more than one Statute acre; therefore, we may conclude that the ager, or acre, was equal to half a ferling. The way I understand this is by the assumption that the Saxon acre was somewhat larger than the Norman; we know that they differed in point of extent, and it is possible that the original Saxon calculation was founded upon multiples of eight, while the Norman was reduced to a decimal notation. If this were so, we may believe that the Hid was the unit, and that its principal subdivisions remained, being familiar to the people, but that the value of the acre was slightly changed. Hence, that the “ Saxon Hid = 32 Saxon acres = 40 Norman acres. Saxon Virga = 8 Saxon acres = 10 Norman acres. Saxon Ferling = 2 Saxon acres = 2b Norman acres. “ The document entitled ‘ Eectitudines singularum personarum ’ sdys that the poor settler, on first coming in, ought to have seven acres laid down for him in seed, out of his Tardland; and the same authority implies that his grass-land was usually short of his need. This it might be, if he had only one acre to support the two oxen and one cow with which his land was stocked on entry. ... It is obvious that all these calculations are ultimately founded upon the value of the acre relative to our own Statute measure, in which the Survey of 1841 is expressed. That ager and acra are equivalent terms appears from their being used interchangeably in various entries of Domesday. Nor is there any good reason to suppose that the Normans made any violent change in the values of these several denominations, although they might adopt more convenient subdivisions of the larger sums. They did just the same thing in respect to the Saxon money. Besides, as it was from the Saxons that they derived the informa¬ tion which the Survey contains, it is reasonable to believe that the Saxon values were generally adopted, at least, as far as the Hid was concerned. The minute subdivision of land consequent upon the Conquest probably rendered it necessary to pay special attention to the smaller units, and I can conceive nothing more likely than a slight change in the value of the acre, while the Hid and Virgate remained unaltered. Then, where an estate comprised only one Saxon acre, it might readily be considered equal to half a ferling, or lb Norman measure, for it would have been difficult and complicated to express it in other terms. In fact, where small frac¬ tional parcels of land were to be subtracted, the Commissioners were generally glad to avoid details, and enter A. has so much in demesne, and the Villani have aliam terrain, the rest of the land. If the Saxon ager paid for half & ferling in the time of the Confessor, it was likely to be taken at that value in the Survey; for the law, guce de minimis non cwat, could hardly notice so trifling a deviation. The approximate value of the Saxon acre, however, I have given;—it was one day’s work for a plough and oxen, in other words, very nearly our own Statute acre.” These elaborate investigations of Kemble assuredly may be deemed almost decisive that the Virgp. or Virgate should be taken generally as equal to 10 Norman (or Statute) acres, and therefore were one- fourth of a Hide. Webb, as cited by Sir H. Ellis (vol. i. p. 155) from a consideration of the Ely and Exeter MSS., arrives at the same conclusion; and, for our own immediate purpose, we may reject for the present the various measurements assigned to it by Agard and Nash. (See Sir H. Ellis, vol. i. pp. 155, 156.) In Note 44, p. 160, supra, I have endeavoured to prove that a Jugum was equal to one-fourth of a Suling or Carucate; and in Note 53, p. 171, supra, that, although no fixed measurement could 1 Kemble, in his subsequent calculations, seems to have overlooked these 4 agri. The amount of the omission, howover, is so small tliat it will not materially affect the general - In the table below ho makes the 40 Norman ncres equal to 32 Saxon j but, in this tublo, he makes 40 Norman acres equal to 33b Saxon. NOTES. 179 Vi boa. be universally assigned to the Carucate, yet that, as a general rule, we may considor 160 acres as an approximation to the truth. If this be the case, the Jugum and Hide were identical; and this seems to have been the opinion of Matthew Paris, Ealph de Diceto, Bromton, and the annalist of Dunstable. The only passage in which the term Hide accurs in the Kent Domesday is the following:— “T.B.E. se defendebat pro iij solins. Et modo, pro ij Hidis et dimidia. Terra est . . . In doininio sunt ij”. Et six Villani cum v Bordariis babent vij carucas.” (Extension, p. 18,1. 43.) Now, nine teams, and a tenantry of nineteen villans and five bordars, seem vastly out of proportion for either the old assessment of 3 Solins or the present estimate of 2 Hides and a half; and cer¬ tainly these numbers do not well accord with our valuation of the Hide at 40 acres. Still, the number of teams actually found on the Manors, in several instances, in our Kent Domesday, appear equally out of proportion, and I hesitate to accept this single instance as contradictory to Kemble’s deductions that the Hide consisted of 40 acres. (See p. 178, supra, column 1, last 5 lines.) The fact that the term Jugum is of frequent occurrence, and that Hide appears but once in the Kent Survey, furnishes a fair argument that the former was used instead of the latter in Kent, and that they were identical, and that therefore the Juodm consisted of 40 acres; and if so, as a necessary inference,- the Virga was equal to ten acres. If we test this measurement with the 12 passages quoted above (pp. 8, 9,10) from our Extension, we shall find that, with the excep¬ tion of Nos. vii, ix, xi, there is strong confirmation of the correctness of our measurement; and these exceptions are of no great force, when we take into the account the disproportion frequently occurring, as already stated, between the number of teams actually on a Manor, as compared with its apparent acreage, and I think that sufficient arguments have been adduced for us to estimate the Virga, as a general rule, at 10 acres. (64.) Extension, p. 6, 1. 1,— “In Oivitate Ganiuaria habuit Hex Ed- war dus.” Translation, p. 96, 1. 6,— “In the City of Canterbury King Ed¬ ward had.” City of Tlio page of the Survey on which we are now entering is devoted, Canterbury. almost entirely, to a detailed account of tenures in the City of Can¬ terbury, and furnishes a valuable exemplification of the statements made by Madox in the passages which I have cited from his ‘ Emma Burgi’ (Note 3, p. 150, supra). A careful perusal of the details set out in the Survey, as compared with these statements, will well repay the labour of the student. They clearly develope that the City' was originally held in demesne by the Crown,—that different portions had been thence granted to individuals or religious houses,— how much it stiff retained in its own hands,—what was let to ferai to the townsmen,—and for how much the Sheriff was answerable. In noticing these details as we proceed, I shall illustrate them by reference to the Corpus Comitatus accounts on the early Pipe Eolls, and such other evidences as I can collect from original Kecords. The one important fact, however, of which we must not lose sight is, that the City of Canterbury is here clearly proved to have been of the demesne of the Crown,— Civitas Regis (the King’s City), for such was the title given to a City that was vested in the King—(see Madox, ‘Firma Burgi,’ p. 15)—who, being seised of it in demesne— “Had a complete seisin of it in all its parts and adjuncts. He was Lord of tbe soil—to wit, of all the land within the site and precinct of the town, as proved in the case of the Priour of Canterbury, posthac, cap. 11, sect. 3, of all the burgage-houses, sheds, stalls, and buildings erected on the said land. He was lord and proprietor of the profits, if any, of aldermanries,— the herbage and product of the earth,—profits of fairs and markets,—pleas and perquisites of courts; in a word, of all issues, profits, and appurtenances of the City or Town, of any kind, which had not been aliened by the King or some of his ancestors. But sometimes the King thought fit to grant some part of a City or Town to a private Man, or to a Religious House.” (See Madox, ‘ Firma Burgi,’ p. 14.) I forbear to cite more of this passage, because I have already given the remainder of it in p. 150, supra, Note 3, No. 10, q. v. Various pleadings and documents bearing upon the above state¬ ments will be found in the Appendix. (See Appendix XXIV.) (65.) Extension, p. 6, 1. 2 ,—“ L etj Burgenses reddentcs gabhm.” Translation, p. 96, 1. 6,— “Fifty-one Burgesses rendering gafol.” Among the Records of the Exchequer, there is still preserved a Gablum, — Chartulary of St. Augustine’s, Canterbury, in which is entered an- Hqusegave other version of the Domesday enrolment relating to Canterbury. Judging from the handwriting, it must have been a work of the end of the thirteenth or beginning of the fourteenth century, but may have been copied from one of an earlier date. The accounts of the respective possessions and jurisdictions of the King and the Bur¬ gesses, as set out in the two Records, correspond nearly, though not exactly, as to their amount and extent; but in the Chartulary they are given with more precise detail, and we are thereby furnished with materials for elucidating much that seems to require explanation in the Domesday account, especially in relation to the terms Gablum, — Census, — Theloneum, etc., and other sources of revenue, and their respective amounts. It is desirable, therefore, to give here a trans¬ lation into English of such portion of this entry in the Chartulary as relates to these points. The entire Record, as transcribed literatim from the original, will be found in the Appendix. (See Appendix XXIV.) “ Of the City of Canterbury, King Edward had in demesne Fifty-one Burgesses, who used to render Three pounds, fifteen shillings, and five pence of gafol (de gablo ); and in the same City were two hundred and twelve homagers (homines), from whom the King used to have Saca and Soca; and three mills, which used to render to the King forty-two shillings of gafol (de gablo); and eight acres of meadow, from which were fed the King’s horses, going and returning; and a thousand acres of small wood (? scrubwood), from which the countrymen and the Burgesses of the City used to render to the King’s Propositus twenty shillings; and the toll of bread used to render twenty shillings.” In Note 3, p. 150, supra, I have named Housegavel as one of the locata, or sources of revenue issuing from a town to the owner or farmer of such town. Of this nature must have been the Gablum, or Gafol, which forms the subject of this Note. It must have been Housegavel, —not a regular rent, as for the hiring of their residences, paid by the Burgesses, but more in the nature of a due to the Lord, —a tax, or quit-rent. The amount paid by these 51 houses is not recorded in Domesday, but the Chartulary represents it as having been £3. 15s. 5 d .,—that is, on an average, about eighteen pence for each house,—evidencing at once that it was not a real tenant’s rent, but an assised rent, to which all inhabited houses within the demesne of the town were liable. In fact, it was one of the incidents of Burgage tenure, as appears by a reference to Madox’s ‘ Firma Burgi,’ p. 253, note w; the term Housgavel there occurs in the ac¬ counts of John de Byroun, late “Gustos” of York, rendered 22 Ed. I. Although these refer to a period two hundred years subsequent to the enrolment of the Domesday Record, yet I may fairly cite a pas¬ sage from them, as confirmatory of the opinion which I have ven¬ tured to advance, that Housegavel was an assised rent, not the hiring rent of a tenant. Rendered into English, the passage is as follows:—- “ And 60s. 2 %d. from a certain rent which is called Housegavel, for the same time (i. e. for one year), to wit, from some houses which are inhabited, one penny; from some, one halfpenny; from some, a farthing; and not more, because many houses in the aforesaid City from which the said rent ought to come are fallen down and in ruin, so that they cannot be inhabited.” The inhabitants of our Burgesses of Canterbury must have en¬ joyed houses in better trim than these unfortunate dwellings in York, the inhabitants of which City, and others in Yorkshire, seem to have been sorely impoverished by the Scotch wars of this period. Sufficient, I trust, has been advanced in elucidation of the nature of this Gafol (Gabhm). The modern “ ground-rent ” paid by owners of houses to the Lord of the soil, even where no Burgage tenure exists, is an analogous charge to this of Housegavel. In p. 155, supra, Note 20,1 have remarked upon the Consuctudines of certain houses in Dover, of which the King had been despoiled; and at p. 154, Note 12,1 have made a few observations on the mean¬ ing of the word, as used in those passages. The Housegavel which we are now discussing was doubtless one of these Consuctudines. 180 NOTES. ( 66 .) Extension, p. 6,1. 2,— “FA alios cc et xij, super quos habebat Sacam et Socam.” Translation, p. 96,1. 6 ,—“ And two hundred and twelve others, over whom, he had Saca and Soca.” Thf. Kino’s The terms Saca and Soca have been fully explained in former Saca & Soca. notes. Their occurrence here, subsequent to the assertion that the King had Gablwm from fifty-one Burgesses, by no means implies that these fifty-one were a distinct body, exempt from the jurisdic¬ tion of the King’s Court. The very tax imposed upon them was, in fact, a manorial tax, and proves them to have been within the King’s Soca ; indeed, it could hardly have been otherwise, the very houses in which they lived, and for which they paid Housegavel, boing part of the King’s own possessions. Perhaps the “ two hundred and twelve others” were only holders of small tenements. The Canterbury Char- tulary calls these two hundred and twelve Homines, — i. e. Homagers, —“ Burgesses,” nevertheless, they were within the King’s Soca, and subject to the suits and services of his Court. They may, perhaps, have held of the King small patches of land, or gardens, but appa¬ rently they were not actual householders,—or, at least, of houses of sufficient quality to be charged with Housegavel, or they would, almost necessarily, have been liable to that charge; and this view of the case is strongly confirmed by the Record of the altered state of the City at the time of the Survey; “ rnodo,”— now, as it affirms, the Burgesses rendering Housegavel are nineteen, instead of the fifty-one in the time of the Confessor; but still there are two hundred and twelve Burgesses over whom the King has Saca and Soca. After recording that the houses of the other thirty-two had either been destroyed in making the City Ditch, or alienated to the Archbishop and the Abbot of St. Augustine’s, it adds, “Adhuc sunt cc et xij Bwrgenses super quos hahet Rex Sacam et Socam.” None of their messuages or residences, there¬ fore, however small, had been sacrificed to the formation of the City Ditch,or alienated to religious houses—they remained intact as before. (67.) Extension, p. 6,1. 5 ,—“ Modo Burgenses reddentes gablum stmt xur.” Translation, p. 96,1. 7,— “ Now the Burgesses rendering gafol are nineteen .” Only 19 Just a few words in passing, to call the attention of the reader to Burgesses a f ew f ac fc s 0 f considerable interest as regards the history of Cantee- to House- bury. We have it evidenced here that the defences of the City— gavel. the City Ditch, Fossatum Oivitatis, —was completed between the time of the Confessor and the date of the Survey; of course, it must have been by command of the owner of the City,—the Lord of the Demesne,—the Conqueror himself,—and this, at the sacrifice of eleven houses; and not only so, but it appears that, in order to complete the defences of the City, he sacrificed not only the value of these eleven houses, but that of fourteen more, in securing to him¬ self the Castle from the possession of the Abbey of St. Augustine’s, and other seven to the Archbishop; doubtless not as a gift, but either to obtain laud out of his own demesne, which was necessary for the purposes of his fortifications, or to secure spiritual influence to complete his purposes. Be this as it may, we have now the number of houses paying Gafol reduced from fifty-one to nineteen; the sacrifice of Housegavel, however, taking it at an average, amounting to a sum not worth a moment’s thought in such an undertaking as the fortification of the City—at the utmost a revenue of fifty shillings,—the King’s manorial rights, however, still remain¬ ing intact, and his two hundred and twelve homagers still amenable to his Courts, as they were to those of the Confessor. The Rent of his three mills seems to have risen, since the time of the Confessor, from forty shillings to one hundred and eight shillings. With regard, however, to these mills, I would refer the reader to much interesting information in the Chartulary of St. Augustine’s, as printed in the Appendix. (See Appendix XXTV.) ( 68 .) Extension, p. 6,1. 9,— “ Theloneum reddens Ixviij.” Translation, p. 96,1. 11,—“ Thol rendering sixty-eight shillings.” Tuol. The Survey gives us no particulars of the constituent parts of this Thol. The Chartulary of St. Augustine’s states that the Thol of bread used, T.R.E., to render twenty shillings. From whence the sixty-eight shillings of Thol, in the time of the Conqueror, arose, we Thol. have no details, either in the Survey or in the Chartulary. They were probably market tolls, and such as arose from the privilege of buying and selling. (69.) Extension, p. 6. 1. 9,—“ Yiij acrce prati, quee solebant esse legatorum Regis, modo reddunt de censu xv solidos.” Translation, p. 96, 1. 12,— ■“Eight acres of meadow, which used to belong to the King’s legates, now render fifteen shillings of rent.” It would seem by this entry that the Confessor had reserved these King’s eight acres for feeding the horses of his messengers; but that, M |:ad - since his time, the reservation was at an end, and that now they were let to farm for fifteen shillings— i. e. about two shillings per acre. The Chartulary of St. Augustine’s names these eight acres merely as lands from which “were fed the King’s horses, going and returning;” that is, as if they were in the King’s own hands, and used by himself—no allusion whatever to any rent arising from them. The solebant of the Survey, in reference to the time of the Confessor, coupled with the expression, modo reddunt de censu xv solidos, would imply that, instead of feeding the King’s horses there, as on his own land, the Burgesses were now charged with a rent of fifteen shillings per annum for the use of the meadow. Thorpe, in the Glossary to his edition of the ‘Anglo-Saxon Chronicle,’ cites Roquefort as representing “ Census ” to be manorial Census. or quit-rent. Rente seigneuriale etfonciere dont un heritage est charge envers le Seignewr clu fief d’ou il depend. But it should hardly be limited to that interpretation. In the passage before us, the amount is certainly too large for a mere quit-rent; it can hardly be other than a bond fide rent. In our Kent Survey there are only four other passages in which the word occurs, viz.— “j ruolendinum sine censu”— (See Extension, p. 18,1. 23.) “Dimidiam piscariam sine censu”— (See Extension, p. 32,1. 43.) “ ij piscarite sine censu ”— (See Extension, p. 38,1. 12.) “ iij molini sine censu ”— (See Extension, p. 38,1. 21.) In all of these it certainly seems to represent a toll or cess due to the Lord, rather than an actual rent paid by a tenant for the hire of the mill or fishery. But in the case of these eight acres the amount, fifteen shillings, seems to represent the full letting value of the land at that time; though I will not presume to pronounce dogmatically that it is so. It certainly may have been a Signoral Rent; but, if so, it was one of unusually high amount. This meadow, called King’s Mead, continued, until very recently, to be property of the Corporation, who sold it some years since. They used to let it at a nominal rent, a fine being charged on every renewal. It is situated in St. Stephen’s parish, close to the river. (70.) Extension, p. 6, 1. 12,— “ Ta/ntundem quando Haimo Vicecomes recepit Translation, p. 96,1. 14,— “ As much when the Sheriff Haimo received it.” As this is the first instance of the occurrence of the term “ Vice- Vicecomes comes ” in the Kent Survey,—it will not be out of place to offer a —>Sheriff. few remarks on the position which he held in the County, and the duties which he was called upon to perform. His position was the same as that of the Scirgerefa of the Saxons; in fact, he was the same officer under a new title. The Scirgerefa, or Sheriff, says Kemble (under the Saxon rule in England)— “is, as liis name denotes, the person who stands at the head of the shire, payus, or County. He is called Scirman, or Scirigman. He is, properly speaking, the holder of the Couuty-Court, Scirgemot, or Folcmot, and probably at first was its elected chief; but, as this Gerefa was, at first, the people’s officer, he seems to have shared the fate of the people, and to have sunk in the scale as the royal authority gradually rose. During the whole ol our historical period, we find him exercising only a concurrent jurisdiction, shared in and controlled by the Ealdorman on the one hand, and the Bishop on the other. The latter interruption may, very probably, have existed from the very earliest periods, and the heathen priest have NOTES. 181 Vicecomes enjoyed the rights which the Christian Prelate maintained; but the inter- Sheriff. ven ti 0 n of the Eaedorman appears to be consistent only with the establish¬ ment of a central power, exercised in different districts by means of resident superintendents, or occasional commissioners especially charged with the defence of the royal interests. In the Anglo-Saxon legislation, even of the eighth century, the Ealdorman is certainly head of the shire; but there is, as far as I know, no evidence of his sitting in judgment in the Folcmot without the Sheriff, while there is evidence that the Sheriff sat without the Ealdorman (as in the instances cited, p. 160, supra, Note 40; L. B. L.).—Usually the Court was held under the presidency of the Ealdorman and Bishop, and of the Scirgerefa, who from his later title of Vicecomes, Vicedominm, was probably looked upon as the Ealdorman’ s deputy—a strange revolution of ideas.”.“ The presence of the Sheriff was necessary in any case, while that of the Ealdorman might be dispensed with. By the provisions of our later kings, it appears that the Scirgemot, or Sheriffs Court for the County was to be holden twice in the year, and before this were brought all the most important causes, and such as exceeded the competence of the hundred.” (See Appendix XVII. L. B.L.) “.But the judicial functions of the Scirgerefa were by no means all that he had to attend to. It is clear that the execution of the law was also committed to his hands.He was also the principal fiscal officer of the county.There is, of course, every probability that the Sheriff was charged with certain disbursements, required by the public service, and that he rendered a periodical account both of receipts and expenditure to the officers who then represented the royal exchequer; —but upon this part of the subject, we are unhappily without any evi¬ dence.” (‘ Saxons in England,’ vol. ii. pp. 158-164.) The want of evidence here lamented by Kemble, is amply sup¬ plied, in the twelfth and following centuries, by the Pipe Rolls, in which the Sheriff, as the principal fiscal officer of the Crown, rendered yearly accounts of receipts and expenditure into the Exchequer. I have hitherto been describing the position and duties of the Sheriff in Saxon times, deeming such description to be an important pre¬ liminary to the inquiries we are making relative to the same subject in the Norman era. We will, therefore, now turn to Madox, and ascertain from his researches, what the office and duties of the Sheriff were, after the Conquest, and we shall find them little if at all changed from the state in which they were through the three preceding centuries, as described by Kemble, excepting that the jurisdiction of the Ealdorman as his superior officer was now entirely at an end. “ It was the Sheriff’s duty (says Madox) to do the justice of the county, —to keep the public peace,—to stock and improve the King’s lands,—and to collect the King’s revenue. There may, perhaps, be some other things pertaining to his duty, which, though not here mentioned, are not designed to be excluded. It is not my business to speak of the Sheriff here as an officer of justice, or a Conservatour of the Peace. I am to speak of him as he was the King’s Farmer or Bailiff, and his Collector of Rents and other Revenue.” (Madox, Hist, of Exchequer, ed. London, 1711, p. 643.) It is with his character of principal fiscal officer of the county that we also are principally concerned in discussing the passage before us. In that capacity, he received the rents of the King’s cities or towns, when let either for a term of years, or in fee-farm—and he made his returns thereof to the Exchequer yearly, accounting for them on the Great Roll, or Pipe Roll. (See Appendix II.) We have him here, then, in the passage before us, recorded as receiving the rent of Canterbury, which was then let to a private individual (qv/i tenet nunc), and accountable, therefore, to the King’s Exchequer for the amount—and this was, at that time, the practice usually adopted by the Crown. Madox tells us :— “ The towns, burghs, and villates of England, which were in the hands of the King, were commonly let to farm; and the farms of them were answered to the Crown, either by the Sheriff of the county wherein the towns lay, as included in the Corpus Oomitatus, or superadded to it, or by the Townsmen themselves, per manum suani," etc. etc. (See ‘History of Exchequer,’ ed. London, 1711, p. 226, as already cited in full p. 150, supra, Note 3, No. iij.) And again, he says:— “In the early times, after the coming in of the Normans, the towns and burghs were, most of them (if I have observed right) let out at the King’s pleasure. In the succeeding ages, some of them were let out in Fee, or, as they called it, in Fee-Farm, particularly to the men or Burgesses of the respective towns.” Before we proceed further, it will be well to explain the meaning Vicecomes of this term, Fee-Farm, ; and we cannot do so better than in Madox’s Sheriff. own words:— “ By Fee-Ferme is meant perpetual Ferm or Rent. In ancient time, both in England and France, Ferm signified Sent .When land, or other desirable estate was granted to an aggregate body, or to any persons or person having perpetual succession, or to a man and his heirs, it was sometimes granted in Feudi jirma. This was called, in the bald sense of the word, Feudum, or Feodum, to wit, as it denoted a perpetual estate. For, ever since Feodum, Fee, was, by usage in England, applied to signify a perpetual estate or inheritance in land, it hath been also used to signify perpetuity in an office, and in a Rent or Ferm. Thus, inheritable offices have been called offices in Fee, and perpetual Ferms, Fee-Ferms . Thus, the King, if he pleased, demised his town to the townsmen, or others in like manner as he demised any of his manours to the tenants thereof .... aud when a town was put to Fee-Ferra, the tenure of it was Burgage —as well particular Burgage-tenements lying in the town, as also the town itself, were said to be so holden.” (Madox, ‘ Firraa Burgi,’— 3, 4, 21.) In 22. Oar. II. an Act was passed, by which the Fee-Ferm rents of the Crown were sold to trustees, with power of alienation, to such parties as might be willing to purchase them. • Canterbury was not regularly demised in Fee-Farm till the 18. H. III. At the time of the Survey, as we have seen, it was let to a private individual,— gwi tenet mine ,—and that, probably, “at the King’s pleasure.” For many years subsequent to this period, the Sheriff, in his annual return on the Pipe Rolls, regularly accounts for the rent paid for it by a private individual, as will presently be shown by extracts from these Rolls. By the following Charter, bearing date the 19th October, 18. H. III. ( i.e . a.d. 1234), it appears that then, for the first time, the King demises the City to the Bur¬ gesses, in Fee-Farm at a rent of £60 per annum,—and that they were thenceforth endowed with the privilege of self-government— They were, for the future, to elect their own bailiffs. The enrolment of the original Charter is no longer extant, but, on the Patent Roll, 3. H. VI., there is the following “Inspeximus” and confirmation of it,—by which we are enabled to give it in its entirely:— “ Do Confirmacione j Rex omnibus ad quos, etc.—Salutem. Inspeximus Cantuarie / Carfcam quam bone memorie Dominus Henricus, quondam Rex Anglie, Proavus noster, fecit Civibus nostris Cantuarie, in htec verba: “Henricus, Dei gracia, Rex Anglie, Dominus Hibernie, Dux Nor- mannie, Aquitanie, et Comes Andegavie, Arehiepiscopis, Episcopis, Abbati- bus, Prioribus, Comitibus, Baronibus, Justieiariis, Vicecomitibu3, Prepositis, Ministris, et Omnibus Ballivis et fidelibus suis,—Salutem. “ Sciatis,—quod concessimus, et hac carta nostra confirmavimus, Civibus nostris Cantuarie, —quod ipsi, et heredes eorum, habeant et teneant, do nobis et heredibus nostris, imperpetuum, Civitatem nostrum Cantuarie, ad firmarn pro sexaginta libris sterlingorum, singulis annis, per manum suam, ad Seaccarium nostrum, nobis, et heredibus nostris, reddendis,—videlicet, ad Seaccarium Pasche,' triginta libras, et ad Seaccarium Sancti Michaelis, triginta libras. Concessimus, eciam, et hac carta nostra confirmavimus, eisdem Civibus, et heredibus suis, pro nobis et heredibus nostris, quod de se ipsis ballivos suos Civitatis Cantuarie eligant imperpetuum. Quare volumus et firmiter precipimus, pro nobis et heredibus nostris, quod pre¬ dict cives, et eorum heredes, habeant et teneant, de nobis et heredibus nostris imperpetuum predictam Civitatem Cantuarie, ad firmarn, per pre- dictas sexaginta libras nobis reddendas ad Seaccarium nostrum;—et quod de se ipsis ballivos suos Civitatis Cantuarie eligant imperpetuum, sicut predictum est. “ His testibus, Venerabilibus Patribus, R. Dunelmensi,—R. Bathoniensi, H. Roffensi, et W. Karliolensi, Episcopis;—J. Comite Cestrie et Ilun- tyngdonie,—H. de Bohun, Comite Herefordie,—Hugone Dispensario,— Henrico de Alditheleg,—Radulpho filio Nicholai Godefridi de Craucomb, Galfrido Dispensario,—Henrico de Capella, et aliis. “ Datum per manum Venerabilis Patris R. Cicestrensis Episcopi, Can- cellarii nostri, apud Westmonasterium, deeimo nono die Octobris, anno regni nostri deeimo octavo." (See Rot. Pat. 3. Hen. VI., p. 2, m. 7.) It appeal's by this Charter that their rent was to be paid in future “ by the townsmen themselves,per manum suam;’’ they, and not the Sheriff, were to account for it to the Exchequer. The amount of the rent was nearly the same as that which the King is recorded in the Survey as receiving through the Sheriff, quando Haimo Vice¬ comes recepit. Now let us turn to the Pipe Rolls, and see what returns were therein mado by the Sherifi, relative to the Ferm of 182 NOTES. VlCECOMES —SUEEIFF. Ceevequeb. Brasted, Eltham, Dttton, Mereworth, Bleane, etc. etc., and wo Hamot>e know, from other sources, that on tho disgrace of Ono, he was Ceevequf endowed with the Barony of Chatham and its dependencies, Leeds, etc., and numerous other estates. He seems to have continued Sheriff to the end of his life—for in 1111 we have him restoring to tho Abbey of St. Augustine tho town of Fordirch, styling himself, in the Charter thereof, 1Tamo Oamtii Viceconies, et Eenrici Regis Anglorum Da/pifer. Canterbury, in the century immediately following the Survey. In the earliest of these documents, viz. the Roll for 31. H. I. (a.d. 1130—1)—Rualonus the Sheriff— “'Reddit Compotum de firma Civitatis Cantuarie. In thesauro, xxvij u et viij*, et x d , ad peusani, et Quietus est.” But, according to the Survey, the Sheriff was accountable for £30 assayed and weighed (see Appendix XII.), and £24 by tale, as due from the tenant,—besides 110s. from other sources. Now, as he accounts in this Pipe Roll for only £27. 8s. 10c£. as tho Ferm, and receives his Quietus, (thus clearly proving that he had paid all that the King claimed from him,) we arc at fault to account for these differences in the amount of the rent due to the King from Canter¬ bury. Then, again, in the next Roll, viz. that of 1. H. II. (a.d. 1155), the Sheriff, Ralph Pichot, returns the Ferm as xxiiij u hlanc (i. e. assayed by Combustion), and names William de Ypra as the tenant. In the next year, he returns xxix 1 ' blcinc, and William de Ipre as tenant ; and in the next year, xiiij 1 ' x 8 for the half year in which William de Isfre held it. (See the transcripts from the Pipe Rollsj in Appendix II. p. 2, etc.) Whence did these discrepancies in the amount of the issues of Canterbury arise ? The paragraphs below that which wo are considering, evince much confusion in the details of the Survey. Odo steps in to add to the perplexity. It is evident that he has filched much from the King, or from the King's Tenant, in Canterbury; and, in these spoliations, two of his creatures, with whose proceedings we are already intimate, are again prominent, viz. Rannulph de Columbels and Ralph de Curbespine. In the Sheriff’s returns on the Pipe Rolls, after the entries which I have just cited, there is, on each of these Rolls, a distinct clause— Reddit Computum de Firma Terrce Fpiscopi Baiocensis, in which the sum of xx u per annum seems to be the charge relating to Canterbury. If this be added to the sums with which the Sheriff charges himself for the Ferm of Canterbury, we obtain a result very little different from that recorded as the value of the Issues of the City, quando Eaimo Vicecomes recepit, the deficiency not being much more than might have arisen if the Crown had exemplified, in this instance, the de¬ scription given by Madox, that its wearer was generally “ a kind and equitable Lord, making abatement or allowance to his fermers, when unable to pay their whole tax.” On this point, however, I hardly dare venture to give a decided opinion. The page of Domes¬ day which we are discussing, is full of perplexities, as we always find to be the case when Odo’s name appears,—resulting, I am inclined to believe, from the changes that had taken place between the time when the Commissioners first collected their materials, and the enrolment of their returns. During that period had occurred, apparently, the disgrace and forfeitures of Odo. By them many of his encroachments had been brought to light, and thence arises much confusion; nay, even apparent contradiction between their first notes, and the completion of them on enrolment. In the Chartulary of St. Augustine's (for which see Appendix XXIV.) more particulars of these spoliations are recorded. Before the conclusion of this Note, it will be right to state that this Haimo was probably Hamo de Crevequer, and the same indi¬ vidual who appears in various deeds of the time as Hamo Dapifer,— and, in our Kent Survey as holding numerous manors in the county. Madox ( c History of Exchequer,' p. 634) tells us that— “ In ancient times, the Sheriffs of Counties were usually men of high rank and great power.” And Kemble (‘ Saxons in England,' ii. p. 166) says— “ He (the Sheriff) was, we may presume, always a considerable landowner in the Shire; indeed, several of those whom we know, to have held the office, were amongst the greatest landowners in their respective districts. It is even possible that there may have been some provision in land, attached to the office, for I meet occasionally with such words as geref-land, gerefmod, where the form of the composition denotes, not the land or meadow of some particular Sheriff, but of the Sheriff generally.” Now in the list of the thirteen " Tenentes terras in Chent,” given at p. 7, Extension, we have the name of Haimo Vicecomes, whereby he is distinctly declared to be, as Tenant in capite, one of the great lords of manors in the county. If we turn to the details of the Survey, we shall find that, besides those which he seems to have held merely as the King’s officer in the lands in “ ancient demesne,” he held (71.) Extension, p. 6, 1. 14,— “xxx libras areas etpensatas, et xxiiij libras ad numemm. Translation, p. 96,1.16,— Thirty pounds assayed by fire and weighed, and twenty-four pounds by Tale. All payments into the Exchequer were tested by weight or com- Arsa et bustion, and certain rules were established regulating the eompensa- Bensata. tion required for deficiencies in the standard. Madox, in his ‘ History of the Exchequer,' tells us that “In the most ancient times next after the Norman Conquest, pay- “ ments at the Exchequer were made ad scalam, and ad pensim; and “in Blank silver and money, numero, or by Tale. . . . The payment “ ad scalam was payment by weight, and so was the payment ad pensim. “When money was paid by weight, and the King’s officers accepted “ vj d over and above each Pound of xx 9 of silver paid in, it was called Pay- “ raent ad scalam. This kind of payment was very ancient. And in those “ early times, when there was but little of the Silver species running, and “ the arts of depraving it were not yet invented, it was thought sufficient “ that yj d advance should be paid for every pound, or xx", to make good “ the weight. This vj a per pound seems to have been of the like nature “ with the Trebuchet used in France, that is, Vantage-money, or so much “ added to turn the Scale. “ When Payment was made adpensum, the person paying was to make “ good the deficiency of Weight, though it was more than vj d per xx 8 . “ But, in regard to Money paid in by the King’s Fermers, which might Arsa, Com- “ happen to be deficient in Fineness as well as Weight, it was found neces- bustion. “ sary to use another method of Trial in payments, and that was by Com- “ bustion, or melting down part of the money paid in, and reducing it to “ Vessel or Plate of the due Fineness. “ The Payment by Combustion was twofold. Real and Nominal;—Real, “ when a Sample of the Ferm paid was put into the Furnace and melted:— “ Nominal, when a twentieth part, or j" per xx“, was paid and accepted, in “ lieu of actual Combustion. This latter seems to have been admitted, to pre- “ vent the trouble, charge, and inconvenience of actual Combustion. When “ the Ferm paid in was melted down, or the supplement made by adding “ j" to each xx 8 , the Ferm was said to be dealbated or blanched. As, sup- “ pose a Ferm of C 1 was paid into the Exchequer; after the Combustion, “ it was said to be C 1 Blank. Nevertheless, it is (I conceive) to be under- Blank. “ stood, that, in some particular times, if there was cause, namely, if the “ Ferm paid in happened to be of baser alloy than ordinary, the King’s “officers at the Exchequer required more than j 8 per xx 8 for Combustion- “ money. “ The payment made Numero, or by Tale, needs no explication, it being Numero “according to modern usage.” It was as the word imports, in money By Tale. counted down. Madox adds, “ It shall be left to the Reader to judge what “ the difference in some cases was between the payment Blank, and the “ payment Numero. I suppose it cannot well be adjusted. For the money “ was at sometimes more corrupt than it was at other times; So it is likely “ the Difference varied, in some measure, after that proportion.” He proceeds to cite numerous cases, one of which is sufficient for our purpose here, viz. That the City of London (11th Hen. II.), in an Aid, were allowed xlj 1 v s ij d Numero, for xxxix 1 v s x d Blank. (See Madox, Hist, of the Exchequer, ed. 1721, p. 187, Chap. IX. Sect. II.) (72.) Extension, p. 6,1. 18,— ec Burgenses habuerunt xlv manswras extra eivitatem, de quibus ipsi habebant gablum et consuetudinem ; Rex autem liabebat Sacam et Socam.” Translation, p. 96,1. 20 ,—“ The Burgesses had forty-five messuages without the Git/y, of which they themselves had the gafol and custom j but the King had the Saca and Soca.” I have already made a few remarks on the terms manswra and Mansuea. masura. (See p. 155, supra, Note 19.) In the passage before us, manswa can hardly designate anything but an actually inhabited NOTES. 183 Mansuba. house,—and the declaration that the Burgesses themselves had the gablum et consuetudinem of these houses, while the King, as Lord of the Demesne, has the Saca and Soca, is a most satisfactory confirma¬ tion of the interpretation which I have given in Note 69, that Gdblvm in that passage must necessarily have meant Housegavel. Since that note was sent to press, Mr. Jones’s most valuable pub¬ lication, the ‘ Domesday for Wiltshire,’ has issued from the press. In the very first entry therein, there is a passage which so strongly confirms my observations in Notes 19 and 69, that I cannot resist transcribing it here. “ In Burgo Malmesberie babet Bex 26 masuras hospitatas, et 25 ma- suras in quibus sunt domus quse non reddunt geldum plusquam vasta terra. Unaquasque harum masurarum reddit 10 denarios de gablo; hoc est simul 43 [sic] solidi et 6 denarii.” And a few lines lower down the following paragraph occurs :— “ Rex babet uuam vastam masuram de terra quam Azor habuit.” House- In these passages, the distinction between an actually inhabited gavee. house and the site whei’e one once stood is marked with precision, and the term masura is used in both instances. Then with regard to Gablum, Housegavel: it appeal's that each house paid 10d., al¬ though the Imegeld on 25 of them was only charged as on waste land,—these 25 being assessed to that tax at a less amount, proba¬ bly, as being in a state falling into decay, if not actually arrived at that state; but the “ Housegavel ” remained at its former amount. Perhaps these 25 houses had been built since the adjustment of the Danegeld Tax for the land on which they had been erected; at all events, if we view Housegavel as analogous to “Ground-Rent” claimed by all Lords of the Soil, there need be nothing to stagger us in this state of things then existing in the town of Malmesbury, and nothing to impugn the correctness of our suggestions as to the terms Masura and “ Gablum,” as far as regards the City of Can¬ terbury. (73.) Extension, p. 6, 1. 20,—“ Ip si quoque Burgenses habebcunt de Bege xxxiij acras terre in gildam sua/m,.” Translation, p. 96,1. 21,— “ The sanne Burgesses also had of the King thirty-three acres of land for their guild.” Guilds. At p. 155, supra, Note 21, I have spoken of the establishment of Guilds in Towns, and have entered fully into the subject in Appendix XIII.,—but this case, in which the Burgesses, as a body, had their Guild, it may be well to quote a few words from Madox, who says, in explanation of the origin of Corporations : — “ In former times, there were many Gilds in England. Some of them were Religious, others Secular. . . . The Religious Gilds were founded chiefly for Devotion and Alms Deeds. The Secular chiefly for Trade and Alms Deeds. ... In London, there were several ancient Lawful Gilds, to wit, of Weavers, Bakers, etc. The Gild of Sadlers of London was also an ancient Gild. There was also, in former times, a Secular Gild called Gilda mercatoria, a Merchant Gild, or Gilda Mercatorum, a Gild of Merchants, Tradesmen, and Artisans. . . . Peradventure, from these Secular Gilds, or in imitation of them, sprang the method or practice of gildating and embodying whole Towns. The ancient Kings of England, in their Charters or Patent Letters, did many times grant to the men of a Town or Burgh, amongst other Franchises, quod hdbeant gildam mercato- riam, that they should have a Merchant Gild. ... In, or near about the reign of Henry VI., the Kings began to use other terms in their Charters or Letters Patent of Grant of Franchises. They granted to the men of a Town or Burgh, that they should be a Communitas perpetua et Corporate, —a Corporate and Perpetual Community. Thus, the Terms Corporating and Corporation came in.” (‘ Firma Burgi,’ 23-30.) These Guilds were frequently endowed with Land, as Madox re¬ cords of the Cnihtengild of London (p. 23) ; and it is here recorded that the Burgesses of Canterbury were similarly endowed for their Guild, although, as we shall see by our next Note, the ruthless hand of Odo had grasped their lands. ( 74 .) Extension, p. 6, 1. 21,— “Has domos et hanc terrain tenet Bannulphs de Columbels. Hahet etiam ,” etc. etc. Translation, p. 96,1. 22,—“ These houses and this land Banmdph de Columbels holds. Besides these he has,” etc. etc. In this passage, Rannulph de Columbels is recorded as holding 45 Odo. manswes “ extra civitatem,” formerly belonging to the Burgesses,-^ 33 acres which they held of the King for their Guild,—and, besides these, 80 acres of land which Burgesses used to hold of the King in alodia ,—and 5 acres, which belong to a Church,—and that for all these he avouches the Bishop of Baieux as his Protector:—No small amount of spoliation on the part of Odo is here recorded. (See also Note 22, p. 156, supra.) The Term in alodia seems to call for a few explanatory words. According to the cursory remarks which I have made on the Tenure of Alodium, p. 159, supra, Note 32, these 20 acres must have been granted by the Crown to the Burgesses before the Conquest, and they must have held them of the Kang, free from all services, and subject only to the universal land-tax of Hidage. We next read that Ralph de Curbespine has 4 messuages in the City, which used to belong to a Concubine of Harold, —of which the Saca and Soca belongs to the King, who, however, up to this hour had never had it;—and further, that the same Ralph holds 11 'other messuages of the Bishop or Baieux in the City which had belonged to Sbern Biga. We know from previous entries that this Ralph de Curbespine was one of Odo’s creatures, and that he had tenanted messuages in Dover, part of Odo’s spoils. The tale of spoliation is here continued, and the long catalogue of the Bishop’s appropria¬ tions in Canterbury is here completed. ( 75 .) Extension, p. 6,1. 31,—“ Excepta terra ecclesice Sandas Trinitatis,” etc. Translation, p. 94, 1. 29,— “Except the land of the Church,” etc. Our Kentish Readers need hardly be reminded that St. Trinity was Alodiaries. the ancient Title of the Priory of Ch. Canterbury, whose lands, inter alias, are here declared to be free from the jurisdiction of the King’s Saca et Soca. At p. 3,1.18 to 21 of the Extension, there is a list of those alodiaries from whose lands the King could claim no Belief (? Heriot). Among them, as a matter of course, are the names of those holders of land in Canterbury which are here stated to be ex¬ empt from the King’s Manorial Rights of Saca and Soca. They held by the Tenure of alodiwn (see Notes 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, p. 159, supra ) —and though, as a general rule, even alodiaries were liable to the King’s claim for Belief (? Heriot )—yet it appears that all those com¬ prised in the list given at p. 3 of the Extension were exempt even from this charge,—and, more than this: For any forfeitures or mulcts that they had incurred, the King could not levy upon their lands, but only on their chattels. One name appears in this Canterbury list, which is absent from the other, viz. Queen Eddeva. Those Queen holding the lands in Canterbury which had been hers during her Eddeva. lifetime are represented as not being within the jurisdiction of the King’s Saca and Soca; who they were does not appear on the face of the Record. Most probably these lands were among those possessed by the Church of St. Trinity alias the Priory of Christ Church, to which foundation she had been a most munificent Benefactor.—She was the wife of Edward I., The Elder—and is sometimes called Edgiva, or Ediva, and Eddid. By King Edward she was mother of Edmund and Edred, successively Kiugs of England. She died a.d. 953 and was sumptuously buried in the Cathedral. Dr. Ducarel contributed to Hasted’s History, an engraving from her supposed Portrait in the Library of the Cathedral. ( 76 .) Extension, p. 6, 1. 37,—Usque ad unam leugarn et iij perticas, et iij pedes. Translation, p. 96,1. 33,—As far as one Leuga and three perches and three feet. As usual, when we attempt to assign the precise value of any of the Leuca. measurements of laud, etc., in the Surveys, our efforts are abortive. In this case, as in all others, we are compelled to satisfy ourselveB with approximate conjectures. 184 NOTES. Leuca. In the Begister of Battle Abbey (MSS. Cott. Domitian, A. ii. f. 14) dating in the twelfth century, we have the following passage:— “ Leuga autem Anglica duodecim quaranteines conficitur. Quarantena vero quadraginta perticis. Pertica habet longitudinis sexdecim pedes.” I. e., “ The English Leuga is made up of twelve Quaranteines,—but the Quaranteiue, of forty Perches. The Perch has sixteen feet in length.” The Term Quarantena, i. e. Forty Long, is the origin of our term Furlong. According to the above estimate, the Leuga would consist of 2560 yards. But, if we calculate the Pertica at 161 feet, the usual estimate,—we shall obtain 2640 yards as the contents of the Leuga, i. e. as nearly as possible a mile and a half of our present standard. Among the Cotton MSS., Galba, E. iv. is a Chartulary of Christ Church, Canterbury, of the fourteenth century. Though this period dates more than 200 years from the time of the Survey, yet, inasmuch as it is a Kecord of the Priory itself', its evidence may by some be supposed to claim a certain amount of confidence, in arriving at a proximate estimate of the value of the Lexica in the eleventh century. The possible changes, however, that might have taken place in the interval must never be forgotten in such investigations as are now before us. At f. 21 b of this Chartulary, there occurs the following passage:— “ CERTA Mensura unius Leuca:. “ Memorandum quod Virga communis continet xvj pedes et dimidium, videlicet, quinque ulnas et dimidiam, secundum standardum Begis.—Item, xl Virgatas continent j Quarentenam. Item, vij Quarentenro et dimidia, iij Yirgataj, et ij Palm® continent unum milliare. Item, ij milliaria continent j Leucam." According to this calculation, the mile (taking the Palm as 3 inches) consisted of 5000 feet—and thence, if 2 miles made up the Leuca, it consisted of 10,000 feet, or 3333^ yards, i. e. 773 yards longer than that set out in the Battle Abbey Begister, and about 200 yards less than our modern 2 miles. Blomefiold, 'in his ‘ History of Norfolk/ renders Leuua a league, and considers it as of a length not exceeding two miles ; and this measurement appears to have corresponded generally with the length of the individual cases which he actually examined and measured. Putting together all the evidence furnished by these quotations and references, I think we shall arrive at a fair approximation to the truth if we deem the Leuga, as a general rule, to have represented a length rather less than 2 miles; and, accordingly, taking the Can¬ terbury Chartulary as our guide in this instance, the 1 Leuca, 3 Perches, and 3 Feet assigned as the extent of the City’s Jurisdiction over the Eoads were 3351 yards, i. e. about 170 yards less than 2 miles of our modern standard. (77.) Extension, p. 6,1. 43,—“ Qwidam preepositus, Prumannus nomine,” etc. Translation, p. 96,1. 36,— “A certain Reve named Brumann,” etc. Propositus, I have here, again, translated Preepositus as Reve, —such being. Portreeve. ag j j laye observed in Note 10, p. 153, supra, the most generic term to represent the officer styled Preepositus. In the instance before us, he must have been the King’s Beve—the King’s Governor of his City of Canterbury. With regard to the position of the Preepositus, or Reve, under varying circumstances, I would refer the Beader to Append'ux VII. It will there be seen that the Preepositus of Can¬ terbury was styled the Portgerefa or Portreeve, for which statement Kemble produces abundance of evidence. It might, therefore, have been more correct to have used the term Portreeve, instead of Reve, in this passage; but I have preferred using the latter throughout the Translation of the Survey, leaving the explanation of the Title in any particular instance to such note as may be required. This Brumann, then, was the King’s Portreeve, or Governor of Canterbury, —and assuredly he had stretched his powers to a great encroachment on the franchises and possessions of the Church. Al¬ though it is stated in the Text that these encroachments had been made T.B.E.,—I cannot divest myself of the impression that Odo’s hand was there. The entries at p. 6, 1. 20 to 30 of the Exten¬ sion, show how busy that hand had been in despoiling the King in Canterbury, and there is little difficulty in the supposition that it had been at work in the encroachments before us. In line 44, it is stated that these were disputed and judicially rectified, in tho pre¬ sence of Lanfranc and Odo. They were, therefore, among the ques¬ tions adjudicated at the Penenden Controversy. (See Appendix XIV.) In the Chartulary of St. Augustine’s, already cited (see Appendix XXIV.), there is the following passage which perhaps explains more fully than our text the nature of these transactions :— “ Si extranei mercatores veniebant in Civitatem, et aecipiebant hospicium in terra Sanctje Trinitatis vel Sancti Augustini, tune habebant sui prepositi (sic). Sed fuit quidem (sic) propositus, nomine Brimannus, qui per totam terrain civitatis accepit omnes consuetudines, et teloneum injuste de quo fecerunt monachi clamorera Begi Willeumo, qui precepit ut inde fuisset ante Episcopum Baiocensem, et ante Hugonem de Mundfort, et Comitem Ow, et Bicardum filium Gisleberti, qui eum jurare fecerunt, utde bac reverum dieeret, quibus, post jusjurandum, dixit, quod verum teloneum habebat aceeptum per totam Civitatem; sed injuste, de terra Sancte Tei- nitatis vel Sancti Augustini.” PltJEPOSTTCS, Portreeve. Although, neither in this passage nor in the Text is it actually stated that these claims were adjudged at the Penenden Controversy, yet, from the names mentioned as among the Judges, and the ex¬ pression in the Text, Judicio Baronum Regis qui plaeitmn tenuenmt, it can hardly be doubted that these formed part of the business be¬ fore that Controversy; and, if so, it strengthens the suggestion I have ventured to advance—that Odo was tho Prime Mover in the aggressions. (78.) Extension, p. 6,1.47 ,—“ Judicio Ba/ronvm Regis, qui placitum tenue- * runt.” Translation, p. 96, 1.40,— "By judgment of the King’s Barons, who held the Plea.” The Term Barones Regis, at the time of the Survey, was generally Barones applied to the nobles of various rank, who were Lords of Manors, ^ EOIS - held of the King in capite. From these the King used to summon his great Councils to deliberate on the affairs of the kingdom, and to act as his Justiciaries in administering right between his subjects. We have already seen (p. 160, supra, Note 40) that, for the ordinary administration of justice, these magnates of the county were bound to assemble twice a year to hold a Shiremote for that purpose (see Appendix XVII.); but there arose occasionally extraordinary claims for adjudication, which required the gathering of extraordi¬ nary assemblies of those learned in the laws and customs of the kingdom, to decide between the disputants. Such was the great Penenden Controversy, which had been necessitated by the spolia¬ tions of Odo, and to which, in order to decide between two such disputants as Lanfranc, on behalf of the holders of the Metropolitan See of England, and Odo, the great plunderer of the Church, it seemed imperative to summon all the eminent men of the kingdom. Accordingly, as we read in Selden’s account of this controversy (see his Notce et Spicilegmm, at the end of his edition of Eadmer’s History, p. 197), that, when the King had learned from the repre¬ sentations of Lanfranc, that boundless encroachments upon the pos¬ sessions and liberties of the Archbishopric had been made by Odo— “ Pneeepit Bex Comitatum totum absque mor& considere, et homines Comitatus omnes, Francigenas, et prmcipue Anglos, in antiquis legibus et Consuetudinibus peritos, in unum convenire. Qui, cum eonvenerunt apud Pinendenam, omnes pariter consederunt. Et quoniam multa placita de diratiocinationibus terrarum, et verba de consuetudinibus legum inter Archiepiseopum et prmdictum Baiocensem Episcopum ibi surrexerunt, et etiam inter consuetudines Begales et Archiepiscopales, qua) prima die ex- pediri non potuerunt, ea causa totus Comitatus per tres dies fuit ibi de- tentus.” In these three days, the Archbishop recovered not only all the lands of which his See had been despoiled, but also all his franchises “ within the City and without”—and, as the chronicler proceeds (see Appendix XIV.)— “And by all those just and wise men who were present, it was thus there dereyned, and also by the whole County recorded and adjudged, that, as the King himself holds his lands free and quit in his own Demesne, so, the Archbishop of Canterbury holds his lands altogether free and quit in his own Demesne. “ At this Plea were present, Goisfeid, Bishop of Constance, who was there in the King’s place, and held the Court; Lanfranc, the Archbishop, NOTES. 185 Barones who, as it has been stated, pjeaded, and dereyned the whole; The Earl Regis. Kent, viz. the foresaid Odo, Bishop of Baieux; Ernost, Bishop of Rochester ; JEqeliuc, Bishop of Chichester, a very aged man, and most learned in the laws of the land (who, by the King’s command, was conveyed there in a carriage, to discuss and teach the said ancient laws and customs); Richard de Tunebregge ; Hugh de Montfort ; Wil¬ liam: de Arces; Haymo, the Sheriff; and many others the King’s Barons; and many Homagers of the said Archbishop and of those Bishops; and other Homagers of other counties, also, with all that county,—many, both French and English, of great authority. In the presence of all these, it was demonstrated by many and most clear reasons, that the King of England has only three customs in any of the lands of the Church of Can¬ terbury!’’ (See Appendix SIV.) These three customs are then specified; for the particulars thereof see Appendix XIV. This extract from the history of the Penenden Controversy, is al¬ most decisive that the complaint against Brumann’s encroachments on the franchises of the Churches of St. Trinity and St. Augustine, were among those there adjudicated;—and, if so, it almost follows of necessity, that Odo had been the instigator. The whole contro¬ versy was between Lanfranc and Odo. Before we quit this page of the Survey, it seems desirable that I should give a summary of our observations on the City of Canter¬ bury, deduced from the Record itself and such other documentary evidences as have been touched upon in the previous Notes. From all of these, we collect that the City was of the demesne of the Kings of England; that previously to the Survey, grants of many portions of it had been made to the Church (and this will be still further evidenced when we come to discuss the chapter devoted to Terra Archiepiscopi Cantuariensis) and to religious houses ; that the Conqueror had added to these grants, and, by covenants with the Archbishop and the Abbey of St. Augustine’s, had made over thirty- two houses to them, securing for himself in return the possession of the Castle and the completion of the fortifications of the City; that the number of Burgesses paying him Housegavel was thus reduced to nineteen; that he retained his Signoral Rights over the entire City, with the exception of a few specified possessions of the Church; that at the time of the Survey he had let to Ferm the issues of the City to a private individual ;* that Odo had despoiled the King and the Church of much possession and many franchises; that all of these were dereyned and restored to their right owners at the Penenden Controversy; and, finally, that the City was let to the citizens, in Fee Farm, for £60 per annum, in the year 1234, 18 H. III. (79.) Extension, p. 6,1.48 ,—“ Civitas Rovecestre T.R.E. valebat c solidos,” etc. Translation, p. 96, 1.41,— "The City of Rochester in the time of King Edward was worth a hundred shillings.” City of The rapid rise in the value of Rochester, as recorded in this para- Rochester. graph, requires something more than a passing notice. The city seems to have been granted by the Crown to Odo, who lost no time in exacting all its dues. It at once rises in value from 100s. to £20, and then it is added that the present tenant pays even double this sum, viz. £40. To what cause can we attribute it, that the tenant pays twice as much as the value at which it is assessed (valet) ? He had, doubtless, found means of adding to the exactions by which Odo had already raised the amount of the issues of the city. And here another question arises : Of whom did this tenant hold,—of Odo or of the King? If of the latter, this part of the entry, ille qui tenet, must have been added to the Commissioners’ returns after they were delivered for enrolment, and after the con¬ fiscation of Odo’s estates. I have already noticed that this difficulty always meets us wherever the subject of Odo’s estates comes before us. There is every appearance throughout the Survey, that, when the Commissioners were pursuing their inquiries and collecting their returns, the Bishop of Baieux was in possession of his estates; that these returns had been delivered in after his disgrace; and that the enrolling scribes could only take the returns as they found them, and therefore entered the estates as though still in Odo’s possession, 1 It lias been suggested to me that the expression (“ Extension,” p. 6. 1. 12) guando Saimo Vice comes recepit would indicate that the City had been consigned to Hnimo, not merely as fiscal officer of the Crown, but that he had himself actually held it to berm before it was let to the present tenant, qui tenel nunc. (See more on this subject, pp. 190-191 infra.) —whereas, if not yet actually seized into the King’s hands, they City of were, at least, under sequestration: hence the anomalies that cross Rochester. us whenever the possessions of Odo appear in the returns. Pal¬ pably there are frequent after-thoughts jotted down, and these words ille qui tenet have very much the appearance of being one of them. Still, taking them as they stand, we can only interpret them as speaking of an individual who held them of Odo. But to revert to our first question,—whence arose this sudden increase of value ? We know from the Survey (Extension, p. 21,1. 29) that Godwin and Odo had successively despoiled the Bishop of Rochester of the manor of Stoke, and the history of the Penenden Controversy divulges other spoliations from the Church and Priory of Rochester. The Survey also tells us (Extension, p. 21, 1. 25) of eighty messuages in Rochester, possessed by the Bishop, offering a temptation to Odo, which he was little likely to resist, in the shape of unjust exactions for housegavel, etc. Then there were the different Locata of the city, pontage, or (supposing the bridge to have not yet been built) toll for passage of the rivei’, tolls of passage from travellers towards the sea, and numerous other sources from which unjust demands, in the shape of Maltolt, such as an unscrupulous exactor like Odo or his tenant, under his sanction, might have made; above all, there were the Archbishop’s franchises within the city, which Odo, from his special and implacable hatred to that Prelate, was little likely to have overlooked, and which—from indications on the Pipe Roll and Memoranda Rolls, as we shall presently cite—he had not overlooked. The first citation which I shall make, as illustrating these sugges¬ tions, is from the Pipe Roll, 9 H. III., as follows :— “ Homines de Rouecestria reddunt compotum de yj u et is', de rema- nenti firme ville sue :—In Thesauro nichil. Eb in quietancia paagii Cru- cesignatorum transeuucium per Rofam versus mare, quod antiquitus capi solebat, scilicet de homine equite j' 1 , et de homine pedite j obolus, quos Rex, de cetero, quietos clamavit, ix', per breve Regis quod est in i'orulo marescalli, in quo etiam continetur, quod, secundum quod paagium illud fuerit, vel majus vel minus per annum, allocetur predictis hominibus in firma sua, secundum quod talliatum fuit per Ballivum Vicecomitis et Bal- livos Ville. “ Et debent Homines vj" qui sunt super Libertates Hominura archiepi¬ scopi.” Next, on the Memoranda Rolls, t. H. III., are the following en- i tries recording the King’s writ to the citizens of Rochester, com- | manding the Barons of the Exchequer to make allowance to them in | their Ferm for this Maltolt, levied on the Orucesignati in their passage through the city towards the Holy Land; and, likewise, vj u yearly for the liberties of the Archbishop of Canterbury within the city:— “ Baronibus, pro hominibus Roffe. Rex eisdem. Computate Ballivis nostris Roffe, in firma Ville sue Roffe, quantum capi cousuevit de Mala | Tolta a Crucesignatis transeuntibus per predictam Viliam Roffe, antequam Rex Ricardus, avunculus noster, Malam Toltam illam abolevit, per Car- tam suam quam homines eiusdem Ville habent, sicut computari solet ante¬ quam Viliam ipsain concederemus hominibus nostris predictis ad Feodi Firmam. “ Item, computate Ballivis nostris Roffe, singulis annis, vj", pro Liberta- I tibus Cantuariensis archiepiscopi in Villa Roffe, sicut eis allocari consue. verunt antequam Viliam nostram Roffe Civibus nostris Roffe commisi- | mus ad Feodi Firmam, per Cartarn nostram quam eis inde fieri fecimus." ! (Memoranda, 22 H. HI., Rot. 10 a.) From these entries of the Maltolts, exacted by the citizens them- j selves after they had their city in Fee Farm, there is less difficulty I in imagining similar exactions, at an earlier period, on the part of Odo and his tenant. Indeed, if we examine closely these extracts from the Pipe and Memoranda Rolls, there are very strong indica- 1 tions that Odo had, at all events, usurped the franchises of his hated enemy, the Archbishop. The annual sum of £6 for these franchises was to be allowed the citizens in accounting for their Fee Farm rent, i These franchises, therefore, must have come into the King’s hands, ! by escheat, probably on Odo’s forfeiture, as part of his possessions, and, as such, were included in the grant of Fee Farm to the citizens; but when the rights of the Archbishop had been afterwards proved and admitted, they were always regularly deducted from the citizens’ rent inasmuch as they no longer enjoyed them, and therefore could not justly be required to pay for the issues therefrom. With regard to the Maltolt (i. e. the unjust toll) demanded of the “ Orucesignati ” passing through the city on their way to the Holy Land for which the citizens had to account to the King before they had their city in Fee Farm: although, at first sight, it might seem that 3 A 18G NOTES. City of this extortion had been the invention of Odo or his tenant, and also Rochester. esc i iea t e d to the King, yet we are debarred from such conclusion, inasmuch as the earliest attempts at a Crusade were only made by Peter the Hermit in a.d. 1095, i. e. ten years later than the com¬ pletion of the Survey. Still the practised hand of Odo’s tenant, ille qui tenet, may possibly have still had power. At all events, we may gather from this infliction of an unjust toll on Crusaders passing through the city, that general travellers had previously been sub¬ jected to exactions for passage-money, and that this toll probably formed part of the increase in the issues of the city which we are here discussing. Hitherto we are assuming that the tenant held of Odo, but if the city was now in the King’s hands and he was holding of the Crown, a few more words may be necessary. The exactor, in this case, must have been the King’s Prcepositus, taking the rent as he found it on Odo’s forfeiture. How long this unjust Maltolt, or whatever it was, continued, wo have no evidence. Hasted speaks of a very early grant of the city to the citizens in Fee Farm at £20 per annum, i. e. the same sum that it is described as worth, raodo valet, in the Survey ; but he gives no authentic re¬ ferences. The earliest record that I can find is an entry on the Patent Rolls, 1 Ric. n., of Letters Patent, in which that King con¬ firms a charter of " Inspeximus,” 4 Ed. III., inspecting and con¬ firming a charter of 50 H. III., in which the King (H. III.) says that whereas he had formerly granted the city of Rochester to the citi¬ zens at a Fee-Farm rent of £20 per annum, and had also granted them divers liberties (which are recited), he now, for their faithful service, and for the loss and damage which they have sustained in his service, remits £8 of the Ferm, so that they shall in future render £12 per annum at the Exchequer. He confirms former liberties, and grants others. This charter is dated at Westminster, 6 Feb., anno 50 H. III., i. e. a.d. 1265. All this confirms the idea that the tenant alluded to in the Survey, ille qui, tenet, was paying double the real value of the city, and that the sum assessed in the Survey, modo valet, was its fair value,—one, however, to which Odo, by good management or wrong, had contrived to raise it. The diminished rent of £12 per annum, according to numerous records at subse¬ quent periods, remained unchanged. It agrees also with the extract given above from the Pipe Rolls, 9 H. III. On the whole, the best conclusion at which I can arrive is, that £20 was the real value of the city at the time of the Survey, and that this value was afterwards maintained when let at Fee Farm, and subsequently reduced, 50 H. III., to £12 per annum; the fran¬ chises of the Archbishop being included therein, but satisfied by the Crown always allowing the citizens a deduction of £6 per annum on that account. (SO.) Extension, p. 7,1. 1,— “Item, Possessio Sancti Martini .” Translation, p. 96, 1. 43,— “ Item, the Possession of St. Man-tin.” Community Notwithstanding the copious details already given of the posses- of St. _ sions of the Priory of St. Martin, we have here another page de¬ voted to the registration of their property. In both instances, the entries appear to be singularly misplaced. In ordinary course, those on pp. 4 and 5 of the Extension should have been included in the chapter devoted to Dover, instead of which they are omitted alto¬ gether there, and not entered till after the record of the King’s sig- nories and rights—the Leges Regis —in different parts of the county; and here again, after a full description of the Burgage Tenures in the cities of Canterbury and Rochester, the remainder of the possessions of the Priory, and a statement of the spoliations to which they had been subjected by Odo are fully recorded. The desultory mode in which all these details are noted, would seem to imply that they were jotted down at intervals by the Commissioners in the course of different visits to the Priory at the instigations of the Canons, whose anxious care for the restoration of their rights was continually on the watch,—and whose influence with the Commis¬ sioners, from whatever cause arising (see Note 46, p. 161, supra), was sufficient to secure them a more complete registration of then- rights than was allotted to any others in the Kent Survey. Besides this, as I have before remarked, wherever Odo had been busy with his plundering hands, there we are sure to find perplexity and con¬ fusion in the Record. In fact (and this is especially evident in the case before us) when the returns of the Commissioners were de- Community livered in for enrolment,—nothing was left for the enrolling clerks M.m Ws but to enter them in the form in which they received them,—metho¬ dical arrangement was beyond their powers ; thus it is that we have them in their present desultory state. The most experienced ac¬ countant, even in these days, would find it no easy task to draw up a well-ordered and lucid statement of the particulars enumerated in these accounts of the possessions of the Priory. Still, a certain amount of responsibility rests upon an editor, to furnish the public with the best suggestions that he can offer, albeit he feels but im¬ perfect confidence in their correctness. Under this conviction I will endeavour to put together the various parts of these records relating to the Priory in as intelligible a form as I can devise. The general summary of the Terra Ga/nonicorum Scmcti Martini de Dome (Extension, p. 4,1.10-15) gives the whole amount as 24 solins, viz. 21 in the hundreds of Comely and Beusberg, and 3 in the hundreds of Estret, Belissolt, and Blacheborn. Then follow the particular details of these lands, it being first premised that they had been originally held by the Community, i. e. the Chapter in one fund; but that Odo had separated them into distinct Prebends, to be held by the Canons individually. Of these Prebends 22 are enumerated as lying in the hundreds of Comely and Beusberg. The quantity of land in each of these Prebends is distinctly set out, and when added together (calculating the solin at 160 acres, the jugum at 40 acres, and the virge at 10 acres, as suggested in Notes 44 and 63, supra) the sum of them is 19 solins plus 45 acres; we shall still, therefore, have to account for 4 solins and 115 acres, or thereabouts (for of course we must not expect minute accuracy in acreage measurement), to make up the total amount of the 24 solins, the estimated extent of the Terra Canoniconim Sancti Martini. Now let us turn to page 7 of the “ Extension,” and we shall there find (1. 1 to 16) a record of the holders of lands amounting to some¬ thing more than 4 solins; but, with regard to these, there are a few circumstances which must not be passed over without special notice. I have already alluded, in Note 49, supra, to the contradictions that appear in page 4 of the “ Extension,” viz. that Odo had been the first to divide the Oommunitas, i. e. the common possessions of the Chapter, into individual Prebends,—and yet, notwithstanding that assertion, numerous particular prebends are set out as having been so held 'l’.R.E.; and now, again, we have notes of the Gommunitas of St. Martin as still existing. This last statement may be readily explained by the necessity that always exists in the management of chapter property, of reserving a considerable portion of the estates for the common requirements of the establishment—for Domus. The nature, also, of some parts of their possessions, such as Tithes, the “ Theloneum ” of Dover, etc., must be borne in mind as incapable of being divided into separate prebends. It was pal¬ pably so in the case before us, and thus it is that on pages 4 and 5 of the “ Extension ” are recorded the lands already divided into dis¬ tinct prebends, while the registration of the possessions assigned to the maintenance of the community is reserved for this page 7. Yet here, at the very threshold, we are met by a most contradictory entry,— De Oommumtate Samcti Martini habent simul iij canonici unvm solin et xvj acras. If this land were of the Communia of the chapter, how can it be consistently described as possessed by three individual canons? I can only conjecture that this small portion was assigned to these three canons for some particular object or services important to the maintenance of the establish¬ ment ; what these were being passed over without notice. Be this as it may, they clearly form part of the 4 solins and 115 acres for which we have yet to account. Three of these are unmistakably set out (“ Extension,” p. 7, 1. 5 to 11) as those which at p. 4, 1. 12, are described as lying in the hundreds of Estret, Belissolt, and Blacheburne, and here represented as lying in the same hundreds; and to these 3 solins we may add the 5 denns named as belonging to them, and thus, apparently, we make up our comple¬ ment of the 24 solins constituting the Terra Canoniconim Sancti Martini. It is well to note in passing that Staxestede is the manor of Polton Stansted, in Aldington, as proved by the Surrenden MS., cited infra, in which there is an entry of payment made to the Steward of the Court of Polton Stansted, in Aldington. Taking up the very next paragraph of Survey, we at once en¬ counter fresh difficulty in the entry Terra Nordeuuode, Terra Ripe, et Ten-a Brandet, which are represented in No. XII, infra, as con- NOTES. Community of St. Martin's. taining 250 acres, i.e. ratlier more than li solin,—thus exceeding by that quantity the 4 solins for which we have to account, and ex¬ tending the entire possessions of the Priory to nearly 26 solins, in¬ stead of 24, at which they were assessed. It is true that a few small portions of pasture, still further extending their acreage, are enume¬ rated in the present page of the “ Extension,” but these portions are so very minute that we need not pause to make any difficulty about them. This excess, however, of 1^ solin seems to require more notice. This land, it appears, was appropriated to the almonry of the Priory, and therefore it is just possible that it escaped enumeration among the lands supplying revenue to the canons; but it was called to the notice of the Commissioners on the revision and supplementary record of the possessions at the Priory registered at page 7 of the “ Extension.” I cannot pretend to offer any better suggestion than this, regretting to leave the question in so much uncertainty; but there is one most peculiar circumstance to be noted in reference to this page of the “Extension” (lines 1 to 16), viz. that for all these lan ds, as well as for the 5 denns attached to them, the “ Villani ” and “Bordarii” are represented as paying specific money-rents, not mere prcedial services, amounting altogether to £4. 8s. Id .,—a large decrease upon the estimated value of the rental “ T.R.E. et modo,” which seems to have been set at £10. This payment of actual money- rents by Villans and Bordars is of rare occurrence in our Survey, and the amount paid by them being so much less than the estimated value is a fact which the Record leaves unexplained. The only sug¬ gestion I can make is, that the difference was made up by the prm- 'dial services of these tenants. To confirm the view which we have taken that the 1 solin and 16 acres possessed by the three Canons, added to these other 3, with their 5 denns made up the complement of the 24 solins of p. 4, Extension, 1. 9 to 13, and that these 4 had, as yet, been undivided into distinct Prebends, but were part of the possessions of the Priory yet re¬ maining in “Communia,”—the Record states, p. 7, Extension, 1.15— “ Ilia quatuor solina supradicta habent Canonici Sancti Martini in com- munitate inter nemus etplanuin.” We must necessarily, therefoi’e, take these 4 solins and their denns (to speak in round numbers),—the complement of the entire 24, constituting their possessions,—as being still in Communia, i. e. the property of the Chapter in common, and the exceptional circumstance of the three Canons possessing between them 1 solin and 16 acres of this Communia must remain unexplained. Perhaps it was only a temporary arrangement, and at their deaths these lands were to revert to the Commu/nia. The expression inter nemus et -planum, and the addition of the 5 denns, might pos¬ sibly indicate that these 4 solins were but partially cultivated and that they consisted mainly of wood, pannage lands, and pasture,— the term denn signifying a low ground of wood, or wooded slope, reserved by the Lord of a manor for pannage or pasturage, or as¬ signed to his tenants for the same purposes. It was generally an outlying portion of the manor, perfectly detached, and often at a great distance from it, but we will reserve a more particular account of these Denns for discussion in a future page. Having given full details of the 24 solins, the Record proceeds to note the miscellaneous possessions of the Priory, which have not yet been specifically set out:— I. There are lands at Northwode, River, and Brandet charged with 20s. per annum to the Almonry of the Priory. By a manu¬ script in the Surrenden Collection,—viz. the accounts of the Priory for one year, from a.d. 1530 to a.d. 1531,—I am enabled to identify Nordeuuode as a manor in Whitstable belonging to the Priory. There is entered therein a payment made to the steward. Curie de Northiuood apud ty-liitstaple. Indeed, an¬ ciently the manor of Whitstable was called Northwood alias Whitstaple. Brandred was a manor in Ac,rise, and appears in the same accounts. Ripa was River, the manor of which was part of the possessions of the Priory (see Appendix, p. 4, col. 2). II. Then it is recorded that on the Inland, i. e. the demesne land, there are 7 Bordars with half a team, who are charged with 60s. per annum to provide sandals for the Canons. III. Then, St. Margaret is represented as producing a rent of £7 per annum. In the Surrenden MS. just cited there is among the receipts, De decimis Bcctorie de Sancta Margareta per 187 annum x“ vj‘ viij d . The £7, therefore, here must be for the Community annual produce of the Rectory, of which the Priory were owners. It is stated, by interlineation, that there is one Busticus there. This expression “ liusticus ” is new to us. It only occurs in one other instance in our Kent Survey, viz. in Extension, p. 49, 1. 43, where we read “xi molini cum gablo rusticorum” clearly indicating the tenants on the manor, Villans and Bordars, who were subject to gafol for their corn ground at the Lord’s mill. If this be so, the Busticus at St. Margaret’s must have been the Bordar em¬ ployed on the glebe there. By the quotation which I have given from the Surrenden MS. it is evident that the record here refers to the Rectory of St. Margaret, not only because the Communia forms the subject of this page, but also because the specific Prebends in that parish have been already set out, and their aggregate value amounts to much more than this £8. IV. Next appears on the Record the Theloneum de Doure which we have already fully discussed in Note 5, p. 151, supra, and on which more information will be found in Appendix IV. It will be remembered that the only actual allusion to this Toll hitherto made, has been a very obscure entry in the fifth line of our Survey, which forms the subject of our discussions. Note 5, and in the Appendix. Here, however, the Commissioners distinctly enter it as having been really worth £8, T.R.E., and now £22. V. Next, we have recorded, as part of the common possessions of St. Martin, three churches rendering 36s. and 8cZ. per annum. VI. Next, a pasture in Medreclive, and certain orchards or gardens in Dover, producing 9s. 4 d. per annum. VII. Next, a pasture in Shedber-tswell producing 16fZ. per annum. VIII. Next, 10i mills, the rent of which is £7, although appraised at £12, but from this the Canons are represented as deriving no profit; no cause, however, is assigned for this deficiency. It is added that eight homagers ( Homines ) dwell in these mills. IS. Next, there is a note of one pasture at Scortebroc rendering 2s. per annum. X. In the next entry it is recorded that “de hac communi- tate ” the Archbishop receives, evory year, 55s.; apparently a Signoral Tax on all the lands of the Communia of St. Martin, though this is after all but obscurely indicated. XI. The next entry, Ibi sunt vj homines cum j Cornea, et dimidia, i. e. There are six homagers with one Team and a half, is most difficult of satisfactory explanation as to the place designated by Ibi. It cannot refer to the 10£ mills, because eight homagers are already enumerated as residing there; neither is it pro¬ bable that it refers to Scortebroc, because that is described as pasture; and, therefore, any team would be useless there, except for the mere feeding of the animals constituting it. Besides which, the entry is disconnected from Scortebroc by the note recording the Archbishop’s claim upon the Com¬ munity for 55s. per annum. Neither can we connect it with hac Commimitate, because the homagers and their teams have all been already distinctly enumerated in the details of the Communia. It is vain to attempt any satisfactory elucida¬ tion of this entry. XII. We now come to a paragraph suggestive of many questions. Are the lands enumerated from 1. 30 to 1. 37 distinct and separate lands from those recorded 1. 1 to 18, or are they the same, recapitulated here in order to introduce the statement that they were exempted from Scot and Custom ? I think there can be little doubt that this is the true interpretation of the paragraph, otherwise we extend the possessions of the Priory to nearer 30 solins than the amount at which they are assessed in page 4 of the “ Extension.” The entry seems, indeed, to be made for the express purpose of recording that of the lands previously registered, 400£ acres (or 2J solins, according to the suggestions in Note 44, supra), and 250 acres more at Ripa, Nordeude, and Brand are not liable to any Scot or Custom, inasmuch as they are acquitted therefrom by the general charges on the 24 solins constituting the pos¬ sessions of the Priory. These terms, Scolns and Gonsuetndo, are not frequent in our Survey. There is a passage in the account of the Archbishop’s lands at Pecheham (see “ Exten- 188 NOTES. Community sion,” p. 17, 1. 9 to 14), in which Scot is named as a totally Martin's distinct charge from Geld or Danegeld. The precise words are these:— “ Pro vj solins se defendebat T.R.E... . De terra hujus manerii tenet unus homo Archiepiscopi dimidium solin. Et cum his vj solins geldabat T.R.E., quamvis non pertineret manerio,wm de Scoto, quia libera terra erat.” And so again in the Conqueror’s charter conferring the manor of Wi on Battel Abbey (quoted p. 189, infra), he grants it “cum omnibus libertatibus et regalibus Consuetudinibus ,” and free ab oirvni Geldo et Scoto et Hidagio, et Danegeldo, et opere Pentium, etc. Now if we suppose that the expression Consuetudinis vel Scoti of the paragraph we are discussing does not refer to Danegeld, but to other casual claims of the King, we may feel justified in such supposition by the above cited passages, for assuredly in them Scot and Danegeld are distinct charges, and then there will be little difficulty in un¬ derstanding the statement that 24 solins—constituting, in round numbers, the possessions of the Priory—covered or acquitted the lands enumerated in the paragraph before us from any other charge than those to which they were them- | selves liable. Indeed, the expression hcec omnia adquietant seems to prove that this is a correct interpretation. The en- I tire passage is Hcec terra minquam reddidit illiquid Consuetu- | dims vel Scoti, quia xxiv Solini hcec omnia adquietant. Had ] this statement referred to Hcec terra, it would have been written illam adquietant, instead of which we have hcec om¬ nia, — i. e. acquit (not this land, but) all such casual charges as these, viz. Scotus et Oonsuetudmes, —and thus, accordingly, I have rendered the passage in the “ Translation.” All the above observations on this paragraph tend to confirm the view that I have taken, viz. that it is not an entry of lands distinct from those which have been previously named in this page of the “ Extension,” but merely a record of such of them as claimed exemption from certain charges. XIII. We now come to a summary of the legal claims of the Priory for the lands, etc., which they held in Gommunia, and the unjust deficiencies in their receipts: Hcec omnia, si Ganonici haberent sicut jus esset, valerent illis lx libras singulis annis; rnodo non habent nisi xlvij libras, et vj solidos, et iiij denarios. Now let us collect the different particulars recorded in this page, and we shall find that Nos. XII. and XIII. do not refer to different lands from those before named, but are, in fact, a summary of all that precedes them in the accounts of the Gommunia of St. Martin. The account stands thus:— Actual Receipts. Value. Deficiency. £. s. d. £. £. " The 4 solins, with their 5 denns Terra Nordeuuode et Ripas et 4 8 1 . 10 . 6 Brandet. 1 0 6 Inland, for Sandals . . . . 3 0 0 Rectory of St. Margaret. . . 8 0 0 Toll of Hover. 22 0 0 Three Churches. 1 16 8 Orchards. 0 9 4 Pasture in Sibertesuualt . . 0 1 4 Mills. 7 0 0 . 12 , 5 Scortebroc. 0 2 0 47 17 11 22 11 Add the deficiency . . 11 0 0 — — 58 17 11 Their actual receipts, according to these details, were about £48, and their lawful claims amounted to about £59, corre- sponding with sufficient precision to the respective amounts named in the text. XIY. We next have a list of the spoliations to which the Canons had been subjected at the hands of Harold, and Odo and his crea¬ tures, and it is recorded that they do not resign their claims for restitution. And thus closes this unsatisfactory and ill-connected record of the present and former possessions of the Canons of St. Martin. I will not offer any further explanations than such as have already suggested Community themselves in the discussion of this page of the Survey, and which I Martin's. have advanced with the greatest diffidence and distrust,—so much so, that I should have left the page without remark, but that I felt it was a duty incumbent upon me to offer the best elucidation in my power; and I can only conclude by repeating again here that all our perplexity arises from the fact that the entries here made iu the Survey of the possessions of St. Martin are a confused collection of miscellaneous memoranda, jotted down at intervals and never re¬ duced into systematic order. ( 81 .) Extension, p. 7,1. 49,—“ Hie annotantur Tenentes Terras in Ghent.” Translation, p. 97,1. 40,—“ Here are noted the holders of Lands in Kent.” After seven pages devoted principally to those possessions which Tenants in had been most subjected to Odo’s spoliations, and which, perhaps IN for that very reason, had been first separately and distinctly noticed __- by the Commissioners, inasmuch as numerous questionable and dis¬ puted claims had thence arisen therein (to say nothing of vast en¬ croachments on the rights of the Crown that had been made by this spoliator and which necessarily demanded their first attention), we come to the ordinary course pursued in the Survey, viz. that of com¬ mencing the returns of each county, with a tabular list of all the owners of manors therein. This list is always headed by the King himself, and then follow the names of his different tenants in capita, viz. those who held their estates immediately of the Crown. It appeai-s by the list before us that all the manors of Kent were ap¬ portioned among twelve of these tenants in chief, viz. the Arch¬ bishop of Canterbury, with his Knights and Monks of Christ Church; the Bishop of Rochester; the Bishop of Baieux; the Abbeys of Battle, St. Augustine, and Ghent; four of his Norman Barons; and his Chaplain Albert. Among these, then, he had distributed all the lands of the county previously held by those Saxon chiefs who had not made their submission to him. When we come to investigate the estates of the Church, we shall find that a very large portion of them remained in the same hands that held them before the Con¬ quest. There had been little interference with these estates on the part of the Conqueror, except in the restoration of property of which they had been despoiled and in additional grants; Those which he conferred on the Bishop of Baieux and on his Norman barons were the forfeited estates of the Saxon chiefs. These tenants in capita granted their manors to other chiefs or lords to hold of themselves, as we shall find when we come to examine the details of the different possessions of the twelve great tenants in capite above noted. It may not be amiss, before I conclude this note, to insert a few particulars as to the list before us. 1. First, there is the King himself,—his lands being those of the Lands in ancient demesne of the Crown; to the tenants of these, peculiar pri- vileges were attached, many of which remain to this day. These_ lands were generally put in charge of the King’s own Prmpositus or in that of the Sheriff. When we come to examine in detail the history of these Terre Regis in Kent, we shall find that the sheriffs, when in charge, had been guilty of gross spoliations; and we can well understand why the Crown in very early days, as testified by the Pipe Rolls, granted them to different individuals in Fee Farm. 2. The next name is that of the Archbishop of Canterbury. As I Archbishop have already observed, most of his lands stood as they were T. R. E., 0F Canteb- with the exception of subsequent grants to the Archbishop. 3. The next on the list are the Monks of the Archbishop, and his Monks of men,—that is, the lands of the Holy Trinity (i. e. the Priory of Christ THE Ahch- Church) and St. Martin, in Canterbury,—and those who held of him hitmen* D by knight-service; to these last a distinct chapter is assigned in the Survey (see “Extension,” p. 15). They seem to consist of Norman chiefs, and, if so, it must have been by grants from the Crown that they thus held their lands; but we will leave this question till we come to investigate the details of the different manors thus held. 4. Next we have the Bishop of Rochester, of whose tenants it BisHor of may be said, as of those belonging to the Archbishop, that they E ’ ochesteb - stood as they were T. R. E. In the record, however, numerous spoliations of them and the restoration of the Bishop’s rights are recorded. NOTES. 189 Bishop op 5. Tlie next named is the Bishop op Baieux, all of his lands being Baieux. grants from the Conqueror, increased by his own spoliations. The reader of English History need hardly be reminded that he was uterine brother to the Conqueror,—the son of Herluin de Contaville and Harleta, the concubine of Robert, Duke of Norm an dy. The Earl of Moretaine and Adeliza, or Adelaide, Countess of Aumarle, were his brother and sister. He was created Bishop of Baieux in a.d. 1049. “ He was Earl of Kent” (says Kelliam, in his compendious account of Odo’s life,) “ and also Count Palatine, and J•isticiarius Anglie, and had the high titles of Totius Anglie Yicedominus sub Bege, — Princess Palatii ,— Curia Palatines regnique negotiis specialis Prapositus, et a Bege secimdus, given him by historians; and, what was of more eminence, he was at that time reputed the wisest man in England. He had 184 lordships in Kent alone, and 255 in other counties, and looking upon himself as rich enough to purchase the Papacy when it should become vacant, be, in 1082, col¬ lected his treasures together, sent part of them over to Rome, and was preparing, with a great retinue, to follow them ; but William having intel¬ ligence of his design, hastened over from Normandy, surprised him in the Isle of Wight just as he was going to sail, seized him, as Earl of Kent, with his own hands, and sent him to prison in Normandy. His treasure was seized and his estates confiscated, and he did not regain his liberty till William Rufus ascended the throne. This King restored Ono to his Earldom; but Ono finding he had not the same sway and power as in the former reign, he headed the conspiracy in favour of his nephew Robert, Duke of Normandy, against Rufus; this last, however, prevailing, he was obliged to abjure the realm for ever and went into Normandy, where he was received by Duke Robert, and had the whole care of the Province committed to him. He died at Palekmo, in Sicily, in 1096-7, in his journey to Rome with his nephew, and was buried in the Church of Our Lady at Palermo.” (Kelham, pp. 25, 26.) Ordericus Vitalis tells us that wben he died at Palermo, he was on his way—with his nephew, Duke Robert—to Jerusalem on a pil¬ grimage. In describing the arrest of Odo by his brother, King Wil¬ liam, William of Malmesbury gives a most characteristic anecdote of the Conqueror in these proceedings. “ He commanded the guards to seize him ; but no one daring to touch him in regard he was a Bishop, the King himself laid hands on him. Whereupon he said, ‘That he was a Clerk, and a minister of God; and ‘that he was not to be sentenced by any but the Pope.’ But the King replied, 1 1 neither sentence any Clerk or Bishop, but my own Earl, whom ‘ I made my Vicegerent in my kingdom, resolving that he shall give account ‘ of that his trust.’ ” I cannot conclude tbis bistory of Odo without adding a descrip¬ tion of tbe scene which Ordericus Vitalis presents to us from his history of the last moments of the Conqueror. “Meanwhile, the physicians and royal attendants in charge of the dying Prince, together with the nobles who had come to visit him, took an oppor¬ tunity of speaking in favour of the captives who were detained in prison, humbly entreating him to have pity on them and grant their release. The King replied to them :—‘ I have long kept in captivity Morcar, the noble ‘ English Earl; in this I have been unjust; but my fear has been that, if * he were liberated, he would raise disturbances in the kingdom of England. ‘ I threw into prison Roger de Breteuil, who opposed me with bitter animo- ‘ sity, and stirred up against me his brother-in-law, Ralph de Guader, and ‘ many others, and I swore that he should not be set free as long as I lived. In ‘ like manner I confined many persons to punish them for their own offences, ‘and others to prevent their causing future rebellions. Justice requires ‘ this, and the divine law, through Moses, commands the rulers of the world ‘ to restrain the guilty, that the innocent may not perish. Being now, ‘ however, at the point of death as I hope to be saved, and, by God’s mercy, ‘ absolved from my sins, I order that the prison doors shall be forthwith ‘ thrown open, and all the prisoners, except my brother, the Bishop of ‘ Baieux, be released and suffered to go free for the love of God, that he ‘ also may have mercy upon me.’ . . . “ When Robert, Earl of Morton, heard that, by the King’s decision, his brother was condemned to perpetual imprisonment, he was much dis¬ tressed, . . . and by his own supplications and those of his friends on be¬ half of his brother, wearied the suffering Prince. The King was exhausted by the numerous solicitations from so many quarters for the release of the Bishop of Baieux; but at length he said,— “ ‘ I wonder that your penetration has not discovered the character of ' the man for whom you supplicate me. Are not you making petitions for ‘ a prelate who has long held religion in contempt, and who is the subtle ‘ promoter of fatal divisions ? Have I not already incarcerated for four ‘ years the Bishop, who, when he ought to have proved himself exemplary ( ' u t * ie J ust government of England, became a most cruel oppressor of the Bishop of ‘ people and destroyer of the convents of monks ? In desiring the libera- Baieux. ‘ tion of this seditious man you are ill advised, and are bringing on your- ‘ selves a serious calamity. It is clear that my brother Odo is a man not to ‘ be trusted,ambitious, given to fleshly desires, and of enormous cruelty; and ‘ that he will never be converted from his whoredoms and ruinous follies. ‘ I satisfied myself of this on several occasions, and therefore I imprisoned, ‘ not the Bishop, but the tyrannical Earl. There is no doubt that if he is • released he will disturb the whole country and be the ruin of thousands. ‘ I say this, not from hatred, as if I were his enemy, but as the father of ‘ my country, watching for the welfare of a Christian people. It would, ‘ indeed, give me inexpressible and heartfelt joy to think that he would ‘ conduct himself with chastity and moderation, as it always becomes a ‘ priest and minister of God.’ “ All the friends of the Bishop pledging themselves for his reformation, the King further said,— Whether I will or not, your petition shall be granted, but after my ‘ death there will immediately be a violent change in affairs. It is against my own judgment that I permit my brother to be released from confine¬ ment, for be assured that he will cause the death or grievous injury of ‘ many persons.’ ’’ (See Ordericus Vitalis, ed. Forester, 1854, vol. ii pp 414-417.) The King himself died a very few days after these scones. Not¬ withstanding this promise of William, Odo was, after all, excepted from the general amnesty, and the “sequel of his history will show how well his brother had penetrated the real character of this voluptuous and turbulent prelate.” 6. Next on the list appears the Abbey of Battel. Their lands Abbey of consisted of the royal manor of Wye, part of the ancient demesne BatteIu of the Crown, and were granted to that Abbey by the Conqueror in these words:— “Huic iterum Ecclesie Sancti Martini de Bello, do resale manerium quod vocatur Wi, cum omnibus appendiciis suis, ex mea dominica corona, cum omnibus libertatibus et regalibus consuetudinibus, ita liberum et quietum, sicut liberius et quietius tenui, vel ut Rex dare potui; scilicet, ab omni Geldo, et Scoto, et Hidagio, et Danegeldo, et opere pontium, et Castellorum, et Clausuris, et Parcorum, et Exercitibus, et omnibus auxiliis, et Placitis, et Querelis, et Siris et Hundredis, cum Saca et Soca, et Tol, ec Thearn, et Infangentheof, et Warpeni, et Lestagiis, et Hainsocne, et Forstal, et Blodwite, et Cildwite, et Latrocinis, si acciderit. Similiter do duos de- narios de omnibus forisfacturis et placitis omnium Hundredorum que per¬ tinent ad summonicionem de Wi. In Dengemareis vero, quod est unum membrum de Wi, concedo eidem ecclesie omnes maritimas consuetudines quas illic habui cum omni Wrec. Et si piscis qui adspeis vocatur illic ad- venerit, abbatis et monachorum sit totus : si vero intra terminos de Blacke- ware, et Horsemede, et Brudelle usque Withiburne appulerit, duas partes ejusdem piscis, et linguam, habeat Ecclesia, sicut ego semper habui.” (See Harleian Collection of Charters, 83, A 12.) 7. Next, the Abbey of St. Augustine,—of whose lands it may be Abbey of said, as of those of the Archbishop,—they stood as they were T.R.E., St - Augus- with the exception of subsequent grants. This appears from the Ifj entries of the different manors belonging to this Abbey in the de¬ tails of the Survey, wherein are occasionally named those who held them T.R.E., or those who had made grants to the Abbey. 8. Next comes the Abbey of Gand, i. e. the Abbey of St. Peter Abbey of of Ghent, in Flanders. Their lands consisted of the manor of Gue ‘ nt - Lewisham, which, with its appendages, Greenwich and Combe,— according to Tanner and Dugdale,—was granted to the Abbey by Elthruda, King Alfred’s niece. 9. Next on the b'st appears the name of Hugh de Montford. He Hugh de accompanied the Conqueror to England, fighting on his side at the Montfobd. battle of Hastings. He was one of William’s most trusted and valued servants, being often employed by him in high places of trust, and was one of the barons assembled at the Penenden Con¬ troversy to adjudicate between Lanfranc and Odo. The King re¬ warded him for his continued and faithful services by grants of more than a hundred lordships in different parts of England, fifty of them being in Kent. He was son of Thurston de Bastenbergh and an¬ cestor of the Lords of Montfort-surrRisle, and lost his life in a combat with Vauquelin de Ferrieres. 10. Next on the list is Eustace, Earl of Boulogne. He, too, was Eustace, at the battle of Hastings, where, according to Ordericus, he appears ^ AI,L °* to have been somewhat over-cautious and was severely wounded. The Conqueror conferred upon him grants of lands and honours. In Kent he had Westerham and Boughton Aluph, formerly held by Godwin. Differences having arisen between him and the King, the 3 B 190 NOTES. Eustace, Kentish men, groaning under the tyranny and oppressions of the Eabl of Normans, sent messengers to him to cross the sea and aid them in wresting Dover Castle from the King’s garrison. He accepted the invitation and crossed over in the dead of the night. On his arrival, he was strenuously supported by the men of Kent, and made a vigorous attack on the castle; but the garrison offered a determined resistance, and the result was a most disastrous defeat for Eustace and the slaughter of an immense amount of his followers, escaping himself, says Ordericus,— lowy of Tunbridge. His own actual manors, according to the Sur- Richard de vey, seem to have been only Valding (called there Hallinges) and ^ 0NEBBIGIi - Barmin o'; but there were probably others which the King had dis¬ charged from the liability to Danegeld, and therefore they are not named in the Survey; but he had, as I have stated, large signoral rights in numerous other manors. He was slain in an ambush in Wales, shortly after the death of Henry I. His title of Richard de Tonebrige he acquired from his seat at that town, which, with its castle, he obtained from the Archbishop of Canterbury in exchange for the castle of Brion; being possessed at the same time, according “ By having the advantage of a fleet horse, his knowledge of the road, and finding a ship ready to put to sea. . . . Not long afterwards Count Eustace effected a reconciliation with King‘William and enjoyed his friend¬ ship for many years afterwards. The Count’s origin was most illustrious, as he was a descendant of Charlemagne, the mightiest King of the Franks. His power, also, was very great, he being Sovereign Prince of the three counties of Boulogne, Guines, and Terouanne. He married Ida, a noble and religious woman, who was sister of Godfrey, Dube of Lorraine. She bore him three sons,—Godfrey, Baldwin, and Eustace,—and a daughter, who married Henry IV., Emperor of Germany.” to Dugdale, of thirty-eight lordships in Surrey, thirty-five in Essex, three in Cambridgeshire, two in Kent (viz. Yalding and Banning), Herefelde in Middlesex, Sudtune in Wiltshire, Levestone in Devon¬ shire, and ninety-five in Suffolk,—besides thirteen burgesses in Ipswich, whereof Clare was one, whence he was sometimes called Ricliwrd de Glare. There is one remarkable circumstance attached to his possession of the castle of Tunbridge which must not be passed over without notice, viz. that it is not mentioned in the Survey, further than that Of these sons, Godfrey was the celebrated Godfrey of Boulogne, the conqueror and King of Jerusalem. To this passage which I have cited from Ordericus Vitahs, Mr. Forester appends a note that he was “indeed descended from Charlemagne by his mother, Maud of Louvain. As to his being Count of Terouanne, no such title ap¬ pears, and Guines belonged to Baldwin I., Count d’Ardres. Eustace’s first wife was Goda, sister of Edward the Confessor, whom he mar¬ ried in 1050. Ida of Ardenne (his second wife), daughter of Godfrey le Barbu, Duke of Lower Lorraine, was married to Eustace II. in December, 1057, and died in the odour of sanctity, the 13th of August, 1113. Her only children were Godfrey de Bouillon, Eus¬ tace III., and Baldwin I., King of Jerusalem after his eldest brother.” Richard de 11. The next on the list is Richard de Tonebrige, sometimes Tonebbige. ca p ei j Richard do Benefacta, from his residence at Benfield, in Northamptonshire, or Richard Fitz Gislibert, being eldest son of Gilbert, Earl of Brion, in Normandy, who was son of Geoffrey, natural son of Richard, the first Duke of Normandy of that name. He is also sometimes called Richard de Clare. He, too, was present at the battle of Hastings, and for his services there, and his near alliance to the King, had large estates and honours conferred upon him. His name occurs again and again in the Kent Domesday as holding lands and signoral rights in nearly twenty different parishes, many of these probably being detached appendants of his manor or in the description of various manors, there are occasional statement that portions of them, or rights of pannage, etc., and signoral rights, belong to Richard de Tonebrige, as in his leuga , i.e. the franchises attached to his castle. It is difficult to say why the castle itself and the town or manor of Tonebrige thus escaped valuation in the Survey, unless it be that when in the possession of the Archbishop, they were exempted from Danegeld , and still continued to enjoy that privilege, and therefore, as in numerous other instances, they were not noticed by the Commissioners in their returns. Richard de Tonebrige was succeeded by his son and heir, Gilbert, first Earl of Clare, direct ancestor of the Barons Bergevenny and Despencer, now represented by the Earl of Abergavenny and Vis¬ countess Falmouth, who is jure suo Baroness Despencer. The second son of this Gilbert was Gilbert, surnamed Strongbow, Earl of Pem¬ broke, and father of the celebrated Richard de Clare, also surnamed Strongbow, second Earl of Pembroke—the conqueror of Ireland. 12. The next on the list appears “ Haimo the Sheriff,” an account Hatmo the of whom and of his large possessions I have given in Note 70, supra. Sheriff. 13. The last of these tenants in ccvpite named in the list is Albert Albert, the the Chaplain; with regard to whom, Kelham observes that the office Chaplain. “ Capellanus may be likewise interpreted both secretary and chan¬ cellor, for these offices and that of King’s Chaplain were, in early times, one and the same, being always filled by an ecclesiastic, who had also the care of the King’s chapel.” APPENDIX I. WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR AND THE CONFESSOR. Wiixtam the The account of William’s confirmation of the Laws of the Confessor 2T5ST ' s a ' so vividly described in those Laws ch. xxxiv., and this description is Confessor. followed by a concise history of the descent of the Saxon Kings from Edgar to the Confessor himself, and his reasons for adopting William as his successor, all of which may well find a place here, as illustrative of the Conqueror’s conduct on assuming the Crown. “ Quod a Rege Anglorum Willelmo auctorizata est Lex Regis Fdwardi. [“ XXXIV. Quam cum ipse Willelmus rex audivit et alias leges de “ regno, maxime appreciatus est earn, et voluit ut ipsa observaretur per “ totum regnum; quia dicebat, quod autecessores sui, et omnium de Nor- “ mannia, de Norweia venerunt, et legem eorum, cum houesta erat, bene “ deberent sequi, cum profundior et honestior sit omnibus aliis, scilicet, “ Britonum, Anglorum, Pictorum.—Sed omnes compatriote qui leges nar- “ raverunt summopere precati sunt eum, ut permitteret eis leges et consue- “ tudines habere cum quibus vixerant antecessores eorum, et ipsi nati sunt, “ quia durum erat eis suscipere leges, et judicare de eis quas nesciebant. “ Et hoc eciam precati sunt eum, pro anima regis JEdwardi, qui sibi cou- “ cesserat regnum, et cujus erant leges, nec aliorum exterorum. Tandem “ consilio et precatu baronum adquievit, et sic auctorizate sunt leges regis “ JEdwardi, que prius adinvente et constitute fuerunt tempore regis “ -Edgari, avi sui; sed, post mortem ejus dimisse sunt annis lx et viij. “iEdwardus, filius ejus, natus de uxore, regnavit quatuor annis, xyj “ ebdomatibus minus. Quo occiso innocente, dolo noveree sue, propter innocentem vitam suam castam, et elemosinis plenum, interfeccionem “ ejus pro martirio reputaverunt, ei et vocaverunt Sanctum. Post, “ ASldredus, frnter ejus, regnum suscepit, regnavitque in multis periculis “ xxx et viij annis. Post iEldredum, filius ejusiEdmundus, cui cognomen “ erat Hirenside, i. latus ferreum, ix fere ruensibus regnavit, in quibus “ viriliter quinquies contra Danorum regein Chnutum dimieavit. Pacto “ vero ultimo bello coneordiam inter se fecerunt. Regnum quoque Anglie “ diviserunt; diinidium Clinuto, et dimidium .Edtnundo, ea condicione, ut “ si quis eorum superviveret, alius eorum totum possideret, nec interim “ aliquis eorum coronaretur. Sed hac couveneione, cunctis primatibus “ Anglie consencientibus, firmata, post priinum mensem, _2Edmuudus ex “ hac luce, proh dolor, subtrahitur.—Chnutus vero totum suscepit Anglie “ regnum, regnavitque fere x et viij annis. Quo mortuo, Haraldus, i'also, “ peue ab omnibus filius ejus putatus, successit, et v annis regnavit. Post “quern Hardechnutus, filius Chnuti ex Alfueua Imrae, sorore Roberti “ comitis Normannie, et matre Edwardi regis, ij annis, xij ebdomatibus “ minus, regnavit; et sic completi sunt lx et viij anni dimissis legibus. “ Sed, postquam JEdwardus rex venit ad regnum, consilio baronum regni, “ legem omissam, quia houesta videbatur eis, et quia avus ejus earn consti- “ tuerat, fecit earn reparare et confirmare, et sic voeata est lex regis “./Edwardi, que prius dimissa erat a morte JSdgari avi sui usque ad “ tempus suum. “ Re adventu Sancte. Margarnte Matris Regis Scocie, et JEdgari AEthe- “ ling, Fratris ejus, in Anglian, Re quo Sanctus Edwardus Rex “ Ileredcm suum facere noluit; et posted Willelmum Rucem Ilere- “ dem suum fecit, eo quod Re AEdgaro facere nequivit. “XXXV.—Iste supradictus Edmundus liabuit filium quendam qui “ vocatus est iEdwardus ; qui, mortuo patre, timore aufugit de ista terra “ usque ad terram Bugorum, quam nos vocamus Russciam, quern rex “ ipsius terre, Malesclodus nomine, ut audivit, et intellexit quis esset, et “ unde esset, honeste eum retinuit. Et ipse Edwardus accepit ibi uxorem “nobili genere, de qua ortus est ei JEdgarus iEtheling, et Margareta Wiixiam the “ regina Scocie, et Christiana soror ejus; cui Christiane rex Edwardus Conqueror “ dedit terrnm quam habuit postea Radulfus de Limeseia, propter quem confessor. “ misit Rex Edwardus, avunculus ejus, et fecit eum ad se venire. Ipse “ autem et uxor ejus non multo tempore vixeruut post adventum eorum. “ Edgarum filium eorum seeum retinuit et nutrivit pro filio. Quia vero “ heredem putabat eum facere, nominavit eum /Etheling, quod nos dicimus “ domicellum; sed nos de pluribus, quia filios baronum vocamus domi- “ cellos; Angli autem nullum printer filios regum vocant. Quod si expres- “ sius volumus dicere, dicemus, quod in quadam parte Saxonie ling “ ‘imago’ dicebatur, AEdela, Anglice ‘nobilis,’ quod conjunctum Ethling, i. “ ‘ nobilis imagounde eciam occidentales Saxonici, scilicet, Execestre “ habent in proverbio summi despectus, quod, summa ira commotus, unus “ vocat alteram Kinderling, i. ab omni honestate dejectum. Rex, autem “ Edwardus, quia cognovit uequiciam gentis sue, et maxime filiorum Godu- “uini, scilicet, Haraldi,—Tosti,—Gurthi, Leofwini,—comperit quod non “posset esse stabile vel firmura de ASdgaro,— et adoptavit Willelmum “ ducem Normannorum, filium Roberti, avunculi sui, qui postea, auxiliante “ Deo, conquisivit rectum suum bello contra predictum Haraldum.”] (Leges Edwardi Confessoris, xxxiv., xxxv., apud Tliorpe, vol. i. pp. 458, 459,4(30.) II. KEDDITUS DE DOVOR. In many instances, and more especially in that of Doyor, it is important Reddttus de to the complete understanding of our Domesday Survey, that we should Dovob. know with certainty by whom the Town or Manor was actually held at the time, and how, whether by the King himself, or by others, at Ferm or Fee Ferm, or by the Sheriff or other officer, as Gustos. The question is one of much difficulty, even in later times, when we have the Pipe Rolls to aid us in the investigation. Having, in the Notes, raised the question with regard to Dover, I will take the opportunity of discussing it fully in all its bearings on this and other Towns and Manors which we shall have before us in the progress of this Work. I have already quoted largely from Madox, with reference to the assign¬ ment of Towns to Fermors or Custodes thereof. I will now extract a few passages from the same learned author as to the Sheriffs’ Office, their Ferm or custody of Counties, and the form in which their accounts were rendered, and I will follow these up by actual transcripts of portions of these accounts from the earliest Pipe Rolls, those, for instance, that date within little more than half a Century from the time of the Survey. Although it might seem at first sight that these extracts belong more appropriately to counties than to towns, yet (as indicated in Note 3, iii. and v.) the Issues of Towns were often necessarily included in the accounts of the Sheriff, as the proper officer to deliver them. They will hardly, there¬ fore, be out of place here, since they will enable us to explain more satis¬ factorily the position of the King’s Towns and Manors, and specially of Dover itself, than we could without the aid of these documents. “Another branch of the Crown Revenue,” says Madox, “consisted of «the Ferms of the Counties of the Realm (when they were letten to Ferm) “ or the issues of the Custody of them (in case they were put into Custody). “ From the reign of King William down to the succeeding times, the King “ (who was Lord of the Great Seiguurie of the Realm) used to let out the “ several Counties of England, upon a yearly Ferm or Rent, concerted ), and Index). If tliis conjecture of Madox bo correct, that William Cade was an officer of the Exchequer, it furnishes almost conclusive evidence that Dover was now in the King’s own hands, by escheat on Odo’s forfeiture, since the accounts were not to be rendered by tho Sheriff, but by an officer of the Exchequer, to whom the Sheriff paid ovor the money. APPENDIX. Pirs Eon., “ Et Tarenteford c" Wane, quaa idem Willelmus liabet. 1156-7. “Et in Einesford, 1 xxxij", hlanc, quas idem Willelmus habet. “ Et in Terris Datis.—Monachis de Eaueesham e“, hlanc. “ Et Abbati de Angeli x“, hlanc. “ Et Mainabdo Camerario vj", nume.ro. “ Et Militibus de Templo xx a , per breve Regis. In Chingeswud. “ Et in ltestauro de Chemesing x u , nwnero. “ Et Eogeko Ostiario j mareara argenti, precepto Episcopi Eliensis. “ Et Gaufrido Monacuo xlviij 11 et x s . In corredio Comitis Flan- “ DEESSIS. “ Et in Camera Curie Warini Filh Geeoldi, x". “Et Baldwino de Witsant iiij" ad Corrodium ejusdem Comitis per “ breve Regis. 2 “ Et debet xi u et vij s et vj d , hlanc. “Et idem Vicecomes reddit eompotum de Firma Terra Episcopi “ Baiocensis. In Thesauro xlvij" et vj v et viij d mmero. “Etin Dottba xxx" numero, de quibus Willelmus Cade debet reddere “ eompotum. “ Et in Cantuaria xx" numero, quas Willelmus de Ipbe habet. “ Et eidem lv“ in Boxeleia, numero. “ Et eidem c" et lxviij 8 et vij d in numero in Hou. “ Et in Wasto ejusdem Manerii quod filius Regis Stephani habuit, c et “ vij s numero. “ Et debet xij 11 et iij s et x d numero." Pipe Bou., 1157. The next Pipe Roll extant is that for the year 3 Hen. II. a.d. 1157._ It commences thus:— “ Chest. Radulpiius Picot reddit eompotum de xi 11 et vij s et vj d , de “ Yetebi Firma, hlanc. —In Thesaurum liberavit. Et Quietus est. “Idem Vicecomes reddit eompotum de xij 11 et iij 8 et x d , de Veteri “ Pibma numero. —In thesaurum liberavit. Ed Quietus est. “ Et idem Vicecomes reddit eompotum de Noya Firma. “ In thesauro lxvij 11 et ij d , blane. “ In Elemosinis Constitutis. Militibus de Templo, ij marcas argenti. “ In Decimis Constitutis Monachis de Sancto Augustino x u numero. “ Et Monachis de Roeeeo 1x s numero. “ Et Infirmis Roffec xij 8 et v d . “Et in Liberatione Portarii Civitatis xx s , quia tacit Justitiam Comi- “ tatus. “ Et in Soltis per breve Regis Petbo Turco vj n , pro j marca auri que “ cnpte fuerunt de firma ipsius. “ Et pro clxxix summis et dimidia frumenti et j summa faborum xxiij" “ et xi 8 et v d . “ Et Gubernatori et Nautis Suecce Regis vj" et xiij 5 et iiij d . “ Et Willelmo Folcardi xl marcas argenti, pro Dextrariis per breve Regis. “ Et in {sic). “ Et in Dodra xxiiij", hlanc, de quibus Willelmus Cade debet reddere “ Compotura. “ Et in Cantuaria xiiij 11 et x 8 , hlanc, de dimidio anno quo {sic) Willel- “ mbs de Ispre habuit. “ In Miodeltun 1", hlanc, de dimidio anno quas (sic) idem Willelmus “habuit. “ Et in Tarenteford 1", hlanc, quas idem Willelmus habuit. “ Et in eadem villa xliiij" et xij 8 , hlanc, quas Willelmus, frater Regis, “ habet. “ Et in eadem villa. In Terris Datis Radulpuo Prcox c et viij 8 , hlanc. “ Et in Eilesford xxxij", hlanc, quas Estrangia habet. “ Et in Terris Datis Monachis de Faurf.sham c", hlanc. “ Et Abbati Sancti Johannis de Angeli x", hlanc. “ Et Mainabdo Magistro filii Regis vj" mmero. “ Et Militibus de Templo xx 8 numero, in Ckingeswuda. “Et Roberto filio Radulpui lxx 8 et vj d , in Suttun meinbro de “ Tarenteford, numero. “ Et debet xiiij" et xvij 8 et iiij d et obolum, hlanc. “ Et idem Vicecomes reddit Compotum de firma teme Episcopi Baio¬ censis. “ In thesauro Quater xx et iiij" et xij 8 et x d . “EtinDouRA xxx" numero, de quibus Willelmus Cade debet red¬ dere compotum. Et in Cantuaria x" numero, quas Willelmus de Ipbe habuit. 1 I.e. Aylesford, which was of the ancient demesne of the crown. • It is possible that I may not have correctly extended the last entries. They stand in the original thus:— “Et Gaufrido Monaeho xlviij 11 et x*. In corred. Com. Flandr. “Et in Cam’a Curie War. Fil. Ger. x». “ Et Bald, de Witsant iiij" ad Corr. ejusdem Comitis per breve Ilcgis.” “ Et in Boxelega lv" numero, quas Monacbi de Bo'xelega tenent. Pipe Boll, “ Et in Ho li" et xiiij* et iij d numero, quas Willelmus de Ipba habuit. 1157 - “ Et in eadem villa lj" et xiiij 8 et iiij d numero, quas Willelmus frater Regis habuit. “ Et iu firma de Ho lxv 8 , quas Will elm us frater Regis liabuit. “ Et iu Shornis ix" et xj 8 et iij d , quas idem frater Regis habuit. “ Et habet de Superplusagio, vij" et iiij 8 .” In dorso of this Kent Pipe Roll of 3 Hen. III., we have William Cade’s account rendered thus:— “Doura. “ Willelmus Cade reddit Compotum de ij annis et dimidio, de “ firma de Douea. “ In thesauro, xiiij" et xix 8 , hlanc. “ Et in transfretationibus per breve Regis, xxviij" et ij 8 et viij d . “ In soltis eidem Willelmo Iiij" numero, per breve Regis. “ Et debet xxxviij" et iiij 8 et iiij d , hlanc." The above extracts from the Pipe Roll, taken in connection with the evidences cited in Rote 3, prove that Dover had not been let to Ferm to the Townsmen. It always remained in the King’s hands, as part of his demesne,—consigned awhile to Godwin and afterwards to Odo, as “ Cus- todes,”—and from the time of Odo’s disgrace, when his possessions were seized by the King, and down to 3 Hen. II., a period of some seventy years, it continued in the King’s own hands. III. COMES ET TERTIUS DENARIUS. Witli regard to the old Saxon title of Ealdorman, and its more modern CoMEg ET representatives, Gomes or Earl, it will not be out of place here to quote Tertius the observations of Thorpe and Kemble. Denarius. “ Eoel, in Danish Jarl, Earl, Gomes, a title of honour which, though “ in early use among us, particularly among the Jutes of Kent, may, as “ designating an office, be regarded as a Danish innovation, and to have “ been substituted by Cnut for the Saxon title of Ealdorman, or governor “ of a shire or province.In the Kentish Laws the title of JEldorman “ does not occur, its place being supplied by that of Earl; a difference “arising, probably, from its being unknown to the Jutish followers of “ Hengist, to whom the dignity of Eorl was, no doubt, native and familiar.” (Thorpe, ‘ Glossary to Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.’) “ The internal regulation of the Shire” (says Kemble, 1 Saxons in England,’ ii. 138), “as well as its political relation to the whole kingdom, were under “ the immediate guidance and supervision of the Ealdorman,- the Scir- “gerefa, or sheriff, was little more than his deputy.” In later times the Latin representatives of these two titles being Comes and Vicecomes. “The new Constitution introduced by Cnut reduced the Ealdorman to “ a subordinate position. Over several Counties was now placed one Eorl, “ or Earl, in the Northern sense a Jarl, with power analogous to that of “ the Frankish Dukes. The word Ealdorman itself was used fay the “ Danes to denote a class, gentle indeed, but very inferior to the princely “ officers who had previously borne that title. It is under Cnut and the “ following Danish kings that we gradually lose sight of the old Ealdorman : “ the King rules by his Earls and his Hiisearlas, and the Ealdormen vanish “from the Counties. From this time the King’s writs are directed to the “ Earl, the Bishop, and the Sheriff of the County; but in no one of them “ does the title of The Ealdorman any longer occur.” (Kemble, ‘ Saxons in England,’ ii. pp. 149, 150.) The Earl, as remarked in Note 4, had a right to the Third Penmy (Tertius Denarius) arising from the Pleas and Perquisites of Courts in the County, which he had by Charter on his creation. “ The most ancient way of creating Earls was by Charter; the King “ thereby granted him tertius denarius comitatm, the third penny of the “ County, and then girded him with the sword of the County or Earldom.” (Kelham, p. 193, citing Madox Baron, p. 137.) “The dignity of Earl," says Cruise, “was originally annexed to the “ possession of a particular tract of land ; and there appear to have been “ three different kinds of earldoms. The first was where the dignity was “ annexed to the seisin and possession of an entire county, with jura regalia. “ In that case the county became palatine, and the person created Earl “thereof acquired royal jurisdiction and royal seignory. By reason of the “ royal jurisdiction the Earl Palatine had all the high courts and officers of “justice which the King had, with a civil and criminal jurisdiction; and, “by reason of his royal seignory, he had all the royal services and royal “ escheats which the King had ; so that, in fact, a county palatine was, in “every respect, a feudal kingdom in itself, but held of a superior lord.” After citing the instances of the counties of Chester and Pembroke and 3* APPENDIX. Comes et Denarius. the Bishopric of Durham, as instances of ancient Counties Palatine, Cruise proceeds thus:— “ The second kind of earldom was, where the King created a person Earl “ of a County, without granting him the seisin and possession of the “ county itself, or any of the franchises of an Earl Palatine ; but only the “ third part of the profits, or tertium denarium, arising from the Pleas of “the County Court.” He then cites two charters of grants to that effect, which will be found in Eymer’s ‘ Fcedera.’ First, the grant of the Earldom of Essex to Geffrey de Maundeville by Q. Matilda, daughter of Henry L, in these words:— 1. Ego Matildis,flia Regis Henrici, et Anglorum Domina, do et concedo Gaufredo de Magna Villa, pro servitio suo, et heredibus sins post enm, here- ditaMliter, ut sit Gomes Essexie, et habeat tertium denarium vicecomitatus, de placilis, sicut Comes habere debet in Comitatu suo. (‘Fcedera,’ t. 1, p. 18.) 2. Next, the grant of the Earldom of Oxford to Alberic de Vere, by Henry II., in these words:— Henricus, Rex Anglie, etc. Scialis me dedisse et coneessisse Comiti Alberico, in feodo et hereditate, tertium denarium de placilis Comitatus Oxenfordscgre, ut sit inde Comes. Quare volo, etfrmiter precipio, quod ipse et heredes sui kabeant inde Comitatum suum ita libere et quiete et honorijice sicut aliquis Conutum Anglie liberius et quietius et honorificenlius habel. (‘Fcedera,’ t. 1, p. 41.) “ By these charters,” Cruise adds, “ the grantees became Earls of Essex “and Oxford, though they had not Counties Palatine.” (‘ Cruise on Dignities,’ 53-56.) Of course we are not to forget that Cruise is writing of a period some¬ what though very little later than the date of the Survey; but sufficiently near that date to form a valuable illustration of the point we are dis¬ cussing. In the ‘Fcedera’ we have also another charter by Matilda, a.d. 1141, creating Milo, Earl of Hereford, with the grant of the third penny, in these words:—J Matilda Inperatrix, Henrici Regis Filia, et Anglorum Domina, Archi- episcopis, etc. etc. Salutem. Sciatis me fecisse Milonem de Glouces/ria, Comitem de Hereford, et dedisse ei Motam Hereford, cum toto Castello, in Eeodo et Hereditate, sibi et heredibus suis, ad tenendum de me et heredibus Dedi ctiam tertium Denarium redditus Burgi de Hereford, quicquid un- quam reddat, el tertium Denarium Placitorum totius Comitatus Hereford. (‘ Fcedera,’ t. 1, p. 64.) We must here observe, in passing, that in this instance the grant is not merely of the Third Penny of the Pleas of Court; but there is, iu addition, a special grant of the third of the Bender of the Burgh of Hereford. If Godwin had a similar grant in the case of Dover, as we have suggested in Note 4, it must have been assigned to him in palpable violation of the rights of the Priory of St. Martin, unless a special reserve were, at the same time, made to them of their portion. Madox, in discussing the term Placita ad Scaccarium, as used in the Sheriff’s Pipe Iloll Eeturus, says:— “ These Placita were fines and amercements sett, or entered into, upon “ the occasion or ground of Pleas depending, as may be collected from “ the Becord [i.e. the Pipe Bolls] here cited, touching the Placita ad “ Scaccarium, and likewise, from the ordinary import of the word Placitum, “ which signified primarily, not a pecuniary pain, but a Plea. Hence, in “ the Bevenue Bolls, by Nova Placita, and De Plaeitis, is meant the “ Bevenue, or Profit that arose from Pleas, aud in that sense, Placita is “ used iu other cases. Thus, by the phrase Tertius Denarius (that is, de “ Placilis ) Comitatus, is meant the third part of the profit that arose from “ Pleas in the County ; and by Placita et Perquisite Curiarum is meant, “ the Profit arising by Pleas, and the other Perquisites of Courts.” (Hist. “ Exchequer, 1711, p. 142.) Aud again, at pp. 650, 651 of the same work, after citing from the Pipe Bolls of various Counties, the entries made by the Sheriffs of the Third Penny paid by them to the respective Earls thereof, t. Hen. II., etc., he says, “ If the Tertius Denarius was withheld, or not duly paid by the “ Sheriff, the Earl to whom it was due might have a writ ordering payment “ of it—and proceeds to give instances of such writs as recorded on the Memoranda Boll. IV. THELONEUM DE DOVEK. Dugdale (‘ Monasticon,’ ed. London, 1823, vol. iv. p. 535), among the documentary evidences which he produces relative to the Priory of St. Martin, Dover, cites a MS. in the Cotton Library (Vespnciun, B. xi. fol. 73), entitled Chronicon Sancti Martini de Dovor a Bruto ad Reaem 4* Henricim II., as furnishing much information on the early history of this monastery. In enumerating the Boyal Grauts made to it, it states inter alia ,— “ Iste With red ns ecclesiam Sancti Martini veterem in villa Dovorrie, “ fundavit et feliciter consummavit; et canonicos seculares de Castro Do- “ vobrie removit, et in eandem ecclesiam Sancti Martini introduxit, et “ eisdem omnes prebendas possessions ac libertates quas prius habuerunt “ in Castro, cum medietate thelonii Portus maxis, plene contulit;—dictique “ Canonici morabantur ibidem in villa Dovorrie, per cccc annos et “ amplius.” Whatever be the authority of this MS. or the veracity of its author, it is the only evidence I have been able to discover of the possession of this Half Toll by the Priory anterior to the singularly worded record of it in the Domesday Survey. The interesting questions that have presented themselves in discussing the history of the Toll of Dover seem to call for all the evidences of ori¬ ginal documents bearing upon the subject which we can produce. I will therefore adduce all that I have been able to discover, and will commence with the following extract from the ‘ Bed Book of the Exchequer — “ Certificatio Portus Dovor, et quid et quantum Domino Begi debetur, “ et quid ab eodem alienatur, et quomodo. “ De Teloneo transfretancium et applicancium Dovor, Prior Sancti “ Martini recepit dimidium. “ Et de dimidio Teloneo de foro, die Sabbati, idem Prior recepit terciam “ partem, et Dominus Bex duas partes. “ Et de parte Domini Begis, magister Hospitalis Sancte Marie recipit “ decimum denarium, de douo Domini Begis. “Et iterum, de novem partibus Domiui Begis, idem Prior recipit “ xxij 11 x‘, de dono eiusdem Begis, piaster malam toltam qua> valere (sic). “ singulis aunis ix libras. “ Et maneriuin de la Biuere, quod valere solet, annuatim, xxviii 1 ' aut “ plus, quod idem magister habet de dono Domini Begis. Et prisa vinorum “ apud Sanwic, quod valere solet, singulis annis, xx‘, aut plus. “ Et omnia ista integra pertiuebant ad Castrum Dovorrie, tempore “ Comitis Kancie, que modo alienantur, ut patet superius.” Here, then, we have it most distinctly recorded that Godwin (as sug¬ gested in Note 5) had appropriated to himself the share in the Toll of Dover, which, by right, belonged to the Canons of St. Martin’s, for he was “ Custos ” of the castle at that time. Then follows a list of those who have privilege of passage without Toll, thus:— “Istisuntqui habent transitum sine teloneo, apud Dovor, cum tota “ eorum familia. “ Quinque Portus, cum ipsorum membris omnibus,” etc. etc., [a large number of Bishops and Ecclesiastics enumerated, whom it will be unne¬ cessary to name here; the list ending with] “ Comes Marescallus,—Comes “ Kancie,—Hamo Peche,—Dominus de Chilham, Comitissa Augi,—Comes “ de Gisnes,—Willelmus de Fesnes,—Engelramus de Merk. “ Sciendum, omnes pnenominati sunt quieti de teloneo apud Dovor, ‘•penes Dominum Begem, cum tota familia sua, in transfretacione et ap- “ plicacioue.” (From the Transcript of the Bed Book of the Exchequer, preserved in the General Becord Office at the Bolls, vol. v. p. 277.) The occurrence of the names of the Earl of Kent (i. e. Hubert de Burgh, for he was the first Earl after Stephen’s reign), the Count de Guisne, Countess d’Ewe, and William de Fesnes simultaneously fix the date ot this Becord as about the middle of the thirteenth century, t. Hen. HI. My next note shall be the transcript of an entry on the Lord Treasurer’s Memoranda Boll, being the Becord of a search made by the Barons of the Exchequer (in obedience to the King’s mandate) among the Bolls and memoranda and other books in the Exchequer, for evidiences as to the claim of the Prior aud Convent of St. Martin, Dover, to the half Toll of the Port of Dover and the third part of the Tolls of the Market held at Dover on every Saturday. It is as follows :— ‘ Becorda, coram Barouibus de Seaccario, de termiuo Sancte Trinitatis, “ anno xxxiiij" Begis Edwardi filii Begis Henrici. “ Kancia do I g ® ex mandavit breve suum Thesaurario et Baronibus “ Priore Douorr. | ' j u l iec verba. “Edwardus, Dei gracia, etc., Anglie, Thesaurario, et Baronibus suis de “ scaccario. Salutem. “ Ex parte Priorts et Conventus Sancti Martini Dovorie, nobis “ est ostensum, quod, licet ipsi, per cartas progenitorum nostrorum, quon- “ dam Begum Anglie, que in conflictu inter Angligenas et Francigenas “ nuper apud Dovorriam Imbito, 1 capte fuerant et asportate, percipere et 1 This piratical attack by a French fleet with 15,000 men, who sacked and burned a large part of Dover, in the space of a few hours, is described by Knyghton in full detail. It occurred “ circa festum Sancti Petri ad Vincula,” ad. 1295, i. c. about 1st August, 23 Ed. I. (See Ttoysden, X Scriplores, p. 2503.) APPENDIX. Theioneum “ habere debeant; et ipsi, et predecessores sui, Priores et Conventus ejusdem on Dover. ,, j oe j ) sem per hactenus, a tempore confectionis cai-tarum predictarum, per- “ eipere et habere consueverunt medietatem exituum Portus Dovorrie, et “ terciam partem theolonii provenientis de mercato ville Dovorrie, sin¬ gulis diebus Sabbati. Vos nichilominus, jam de novo, ipsos Priorem et “Conventum, super percepcionem medietatis dictorura exituum dicti “ Portus, et eciam dicte tereie partis theolonii, in ipsorum grave dampnum “ et exheredacionem ecclesie sue Sancti Martini Dovorrie, inquietare “ et impedire, ac Robertum de Burghersshe, Custodem Quinque Portuum “ in compoto suo, quern ad Seaccarium predictum, de exitibus ballive sue, “est redditurus, tarn de prefatamedietate exituum dicti Portus, et predicta “tercia parte theolonii, quam alia medietate eorum exituum, et de residuo “ dicti theolonii, ad nos pertiueutibus, onerare, et illas de profato Roberto “ad opus nostrum levare intenditis, minus iuste. Et quia eisdem Priori “et Conventui iniuriari, seu dictum Robertum indebite pregrauari nolu- “mus in bac parte. Vobis mandamus, quod si per inspectionem librorum, “ aut aliorum memorandorum de dicto Scaccario, seu per legalem Inquisi- “cionem inde per vos, si necesse fuerit, faciendam, vobis constare possit, “prefatos Priorem et Conueutum dictam medietatem exituum dicti Portus, “et eciam dictam terciam partem theolonii, ut predicitur, pereipere et “ habere debere; ipsosque, et predecessores suos predictos, eas, semper “hactenus, a tempore confectionis cartaruin predictarum, percepisse et “ habuisse, tunc vos ab hujusmodi inquietacione et impedimento inde pre- “fatis Priori et Conventui faeiendis desistatis, ipsos medietatem et terciam “partem predictas pereipere et habere permittentes prout pereipere et “habere debent, et ipsi, et predecessores sui predicti, eas, semper hac- “ tenus, a tempore predieto, precipere et habere consueverunt, prefatum “Robertum, iude, compoto suo predieto, totaliter exonerantes. “ Teste mo ipso, apud Wyntoniam x° die Maii, anno regni nostri xxxiiij" 1 . “Et, pretextu istius mandati, scrutatis libris et memorandis, compertum “ est in rubeo libro quidam Certificacio Portus Dovorrie, in qua continetur, “inter cetera, quod de theloneotransfretanciuin etapplicantium Dovorrie, “ Prior Sancti Martini recepit dimidium. Et de dicto theloneo de foro “ die Sabbati, idem. Prior recepit terciam partem, et Rex duas partes ; et “non est aliud inde compertum in libris seu memorandis ad presens scru- “ tatis ex hac causa. “ Et predictus Prior, super hoc, dicit, quod predecessores sui Priores “loci predicti, et ejusdem loci Conventus, temporibus suis, ac ipse tempore “ suo, a tempore quo non extat memoria, pacifice habuerunt medietatem “exituum Portus predicti, et terciam partem telonii fori, die Sabbati, etc., “ usque nunc. “ Et quod Carte progenitorum Regis, quas inde habuerunt, capte fuerunt “ et asportate per Erancigenas, etc., ut in ostensione sua facta domino “ Regi, que in mandato Regis supradicto expremitur, ad plenum continetur. “ Et hoc dicit se paratum esse verifieare per Patriam, etc. “ Et habito inde tractatu per Thesaurarium et Barones, visum est eis, “ quod ex quo continetur in mandato Regis predieto, quod si per inspec- “ tionem librorum, aut aliorum memorandorum de Scaccario, seu per le- “ galem inquisicionem inde per ipsos, si necesse fuerit faciendam, reperiri “ poterit quod per ipsum Priorem superius est ostensum, etc., quod tunc “ eidein Priorem inde facerent quod, etc. Et non est suffieienter compertum “ in libro predieto, etc., qualiter predictu3 Prior habere debeat medietatem “ et terciam partem predictas, procedendum est ad inquirendum, etc. “Et super hoc, assignantur Willelmus de Carltone, et Rogerus de “ Hegham, Barones, quod ipsi, vel eorum alter, inquirant, etc. “Et preceptum est Vicecomiti Kancie, quod venire faciat coram eisdem “ Willelmo *et Rogero, vel eorum altero, ad certos diem et locum, quos “ iidem Willelmus et Rogerus, vel eorum alter, ei scire faciat tot et tales, “tain milites quam alios, etc., ad certiSeandum in premissis, etc. “ Postea, capta fuit inde Inquisicio, apud G-renewyeum, die .Tovis, in “ festo apostolorum Petri et Pauli, hoc anno, coram prefato Willelmo de “Carltone, quam Inquisicionem ipse modo, ad Octabas Sancti Johannis “ Baptiste, liberavit hie, per quam compertum est, quod Henrtcus Primus, “ quondam Rex Anglie, Progenitor Regis nunc, per cartam suam, dedit et “concessit Priori et Conventui Sancti Martini Dovorrie medie- “tatem exituum Portus Dovorrie, et terciam partem theolonii proveni- “ entis de mercato ville sue Dovorrie, singulis diebus Sabbati. Habendas et “ teuendas ipsis Priori et Conventui, et eorum successoribus imperpetuum. “Et quod Prior et Conventus loci predicti qui nunc sunt, et eorum pre- “ decessores, a tempore quo non extat memoria, pretextu Carte predicte, “ pacifice, et sine aliquo impedimento, semper hactenus habuerunt et per- “ceperuut medietatem et terciam partem predictas. “ Et quod, in principio guerre inter Regem nunc, et Regem Erancie, “huper suborte, quidam hostes Regis, de partibus transmarinis apud “ Dovorriam applicuerunt, et Prioratum Dovorrie hostiliter iuvaseruut “ depredarunt, et spoliarunt, et cartam predictam simul cum aliis bonis I “ ipsorum Prioris et Conventus, ceperunt et asportaverunt. “Et quod constauit Juratoribus predicte Inquisicionis de predicta carta, “eo quod quidam eorum aliquando earn viderunt et inspexerunt, et inve- “ nerunt earn continentem ad plenum donum Regis predictum. “ Et, ideo, concordatum est, quod predicti Prior et Conventus habeant Theloxeum “ et percipiant, absque ullo impedimento, etc., medietatem exituum dicti dbDoter - Portus Dovorrie, et terciam partem theolonii provenientis de mercato “ ville Dovorrie singulis diebus Sabbati, prout eas hactenus perceperunt “ et habuerunt, etc. Salvo, semper inde Jure Regis, cum aliud inde, etc. “ Et mandatum est Roberto de Burghhessh, Constabulario Castri Do- “ vourie, et Custodi dicti Portus, quod prefatos Priorem et Conventum “ pereipere et habere permittat medietatem et terciam partem predictas, “ in lorma predicta, etc.” (Lord Treasurer’s Memoranda, Trin. Term, 34 Ed. 1., Recorda.) Among the Records of the Treasury of the Exchequer (Miscellanea, if) is a bundle of copies of original documents relating to this Half Toll of Dover. They are in a very imperfect and tattered state, in a hand of the latter part of the fourteenth century, on several membranes stitched together in one fascicle. It will not be necessary to transcribe them all here, some being exemplifications or inspeximus of the others; to give them all, there¬ fore, would be a task involving needless repetition. The first of them is a copy of the Inquisition “ de quo warranto ” held at Greenwich on 34 Edward I. (a.d. 130G), as cited in the preceding ex¬ tract from the Lord Treasurer’s memoranda; it need not, therefore, be here repeated. The next three are the Writs to the Barons of the Exchequer to search the Records and to hold the Inquisition, and their certificate in return thereto; neither, therefore, need these be repeated, as we have them in full in the extract aforesaid from the Memoranda Rolls. The fifth is a charter “ de nemini perdono ” of Henry II., securing their share of the Toll to the Prior and Convent of St. Martin, as follows:— “ Carta Regis Henrici Secundi de nemini perdono.partem “ Thelonei pertinentem ad monachos. “ Henricus, Dei Gracia, Rex Anglie, et Dux Normannie et Aquitannie, “ et Comes Andegavie, Preposito et ministris suis de Dovorria, Salutem. “Sciatis, quod nemini perdono illam partem de theloneo que pertinet ad “ monachos Sancti Martini de Dovorria, nisi tautummodo illam partem que “ ad me ipsum pertinet de dominio meo. Quia elemosinam Sancti Martini “ nolo diminuere. “Teste Magistro Waltero Constabulario Arclndiacono Oxoniensi.” The sixth is King John’s charter “ de nemini perdono ” to the same effect. .... Johannis de ne.Thelonei pertinentem. . . . Johannes, Dei Gracia, Rex Anglie.et Comes Andegavie. Prepositis et ministris suis de Dovorria Salutem. Sciatis, quod nemini perdonamus illam partem de theloneo que pertinet ad monachos Sancti Martini de Dovorria, nisi tantummodo illam partem que ad nos ipsos pertinet de dominio nostro. Quia elemosinam Sancti Martini nolumus diminuere. Sicut Littere Patentes Domini et Patris nostri Henrici Regis testantur. Teste H. Cautuariensi Archiepiscopo, Cancellario nostro, apud Shorham septimo decimo die Junii. The seventh is a Confirmation Charter of Hen. III. This, and the others, of subsequent dates, it will be beside our purpose to notice, as they throw no more light upon the early history of the grant of this Half Toll to the Prior and Convent of St. Martin. y. QUINQUE PORTUS. There is so much of local and historical interest attached to the Cinq Quinque Ports and the origin of their peculiar services, that we may well seize the Bobtus. occasion of this entry in the survey to enlarge upon them. As far as the notice before us will allow us to form a conjecture, they originated in a covenant between the King and the Ports, the former granting them franchises which made them independent of any jurisdiction but their own, in return for which they were to render various services, the most prominent thereof being their obligation to supply the King with naval forces; and, as far as appears on the record, this covenant dates from the time of the Confessor. In the case of Dover, it is stated that that port, in return for their en¬ dowment with the franchise of saca and soca, were bound to provide the king with twenty ships, each with a crew of twenty-one men, once a year, for fifteen days, at which standard, as near as may be, according to all the records to which we have access, it remained for many centuries. Jeake, in his invaluable work on the Cinq Ports, their privileges and services, atp. 25, gives a detailed statement of the proportions which each port had to supply, in order to complete the full complement of fifty-seven ships yearly, for fifteen days, laid upon the ports collectively, “ as by the “ memorandum thereof among the Records of the Town of Rye, fol. 55, of “ their old Custoraal, and specified as an ordinance of the king, touching «the service of shipping, a.d. 1229, circiter 14 Hen. III.” 5* APPENDIX. Quinque PoBTUS. T adopt his plan of printing the original Latin and English in parallel columns. “ Isti sunt Portus Regis Anglie, haben- tes Ubertates quas alii portus non habent , viz 1 , prout plenius palet in carlis hide factis. Hastyng, Ad quam pertinent tanquam membra unus vicus litus maris in Seford, Pe- wymse, Bulwarlieth, Hydonye, Ill am, Bekysborn, Greneche, et Nortbye. Servieia inde debita Domino Eegi, xxi naves (‘), et in qualibet nave xxi ho¬ mines, cum uno gartione, qui dicitur gromet ( 2 ). Wynchiclsey et Eye, tanquam mem- Viz. Wynchelsey x naves, et Eye quinque naves, cum hominibus et gar- tionibus, ut supra. Eomone, ad quam pertinent, Promhell, Lyde, Oswarstone, Denge- marsh, et Vetus Eomone, quinque naves cum hominibus et gartionibus, ut supra. Hethe, ad quam pertinent, Westhethe, quinque naves cum ho¬ minibus et gartionibus, ut supra. Dovebb, ad quam pertinent, Folkston, Feverysliam, et Mergate, non de solo ( 3 ), sed de catallo, xxi naves, ut Hastyng, cum hominibus et gartionibus, ut supra. Sandwich, ad quam pertinent, Fordwych, Eecolver, Sarre, Storey, et Dale, non de solo, sed de catallo, quinque naves, cum hominibus et gar¬ tionibus, et supra. Summa navium—lvij naves. Summa liominum (•') in eisdem, mcxl homines, exceptis gartionibus. Summa gartionum lvij. Summa totalis personarum mcxcvij persome. Servieium quod Barones Quinque Por- tuum recognoscunt facere Eegi, ad summouitionem servitii, per xl dies ante exitum, scilicet, per annum, si contigerit, est per xv dies ad custum eorum proprium, ita quod primus dies computetur a die quo vela navium erexerint, ad siglandum ad partes ad quas tendere debent, et ulterius, quam diu Eex voluerit ad custodiendum Eegis ordinationem. Anuo Domini “ These are the Ports of the King of England, having liberties which other ports have not, that is to say, as more fully appearelh in the char¬ ters thereof m ade. Hasting, To which pertaineth as members one town on the seashore in Seaford, Pe- vensea, Bulvarhithe, Hydney, Iham, Beaksborne, Grench, and Northye. The services thereof due to our Lord the King 21 ships, and in every ship 21 men, with one boy, which is called a Gromet. Winchelsea and Eye, as members. That is to say, "Winchelsea 10 ships, and Eye 5 ships, with men and boys as above. Eomney, to which pertaineth, Promhill, Lyd, Oswardstone, Denge- marsh, and Old Eomney, S ships, with men and boys, as above. Hithe, to which pertaineth, "Westhitke, 5 ships, with men and boys, as above. Doveb, to which pertaineth, Folkstone, Feversham, and Margate, not of soil, but of cattle, 21 ships, as Hasting, with men and boys, as above. Sandwich, to which pertaineth, Fordwieh, Eeculver, Sarre, Storey, and Deale, not of soil, bnt of cattle, 5 ships, with men and boys, as above. Sum of the ships—57 ships. Sum of the men in them 1140 men, ex¬ cept boys. Sum of the boys, 57. Sum total of the persons, 1197 persons. The service which the Barons of the City Ports acknowledge to do to the King, at the summons of the service by 40 days before the going out, viz. yearly, if it shall happen for 15 days, at their own cost, so that the first day be reckoned from the day in which they shall hoist up the sails of the ships, to sail to the parts to which they ought to go, and further, as long as the King will, to be kept by ordinance of the King. Anno Domini 1229.” It is well to note that I give Jealie’s translation in his own words, for iu some instances his rendering is palpably wrong. Jeake states that he copied his account of the services of the ports from records at Eye, because ‘ The Ports Domesday Book,’ in which they were originally enrolled, is now lost, though, as he takes pains to prove, that book was once existiug among the records of the castle. As I happen to be in a position to give some account of this book and its whereabouts in the seventeenth century, and to offer a conjecture that it is possibly still in existence, I will not lose the opportunity of placing these circumstances upon record. 1 “ Hero is added in the copy, modo xx naves, nodo unam, which words seem to be inserted by the scribe, wherefore I omitted them.” (Jeake.) 2 “ Grom,—Dutch for a stripling,—from whonce our word Groom." (Jeake.) 3 “ Non de solo sed in catallo, both in Doveb and Sandwich, I found not in some other copies. It seems to note as much as, that their lands then were not charged to the shipping in those members, but their chattels only.” (Jeake.) 4 “The sum of the persons I found false, and have altered here.” (Jeake.) 6 N.B. “ The ten ships found by Winchelsea, and the five by Rye, are to be taken “inclusively for part of the twenty-one to be found by Hasting and its members, “because, otherwise, the total of the ships will be seventy-two, that is, fifteen more than “ they were to find; so as, besides Winchelsea and Rye, Hasting and her members “ were to find only six ships.” (Jeake.) G* From about the year 1630 to 1636, Sir Edward Dering had been Lieu- Quinque tenant of Dover Castle. On his retirement from that office, he carried ■ PoETUS - away with him to Surrenden a large number of the records of the castle, and among them was evidently this ‘ Ports Domesday Book,’ the loss of which is so much regretted by Jeake. Sir Edward, during the period of his lieutenancy, had transcribed into books all the correspondence which had passed between himself and the Council, the Lord Warden, and other public officers and departments. It appears from this correspondence that the Earl of Suffolk, the Lord Warden in 1636, had demanded the restoration of this Domesday Book and other records that Dering had carried off to Surrenden; for I find in the last volume of that correspondence the copy of a letter from Sir Edward Dering to the Earl of Suffolk, from which I transcribe, verbatim, the following extract:— “ Surrenden-Dering, 14th Nov., 1636. “ When I returned from that service under your lordship, my servant “that packed up all within my study, did not divide all papers so precisely, “but that some belonging to the castle were brought away with mine “owne. Most of them, if not all (for I do not know of any remayning), I “ did long since send backe. If I have any more, I have not seene them “since they were heere; but whensoever I doe order the confusion which “I am now in, I do humbly pledge my creditt they shall be carefully re- “ turned, as they ought. “ This booke called Domesday, being torne, defaced, and unbound, I took “ care to have renewed as it is, resolving to have added in the end thereof, “ the names and armes of all your Lordshipp’s Honourable and some Eoyal “Predecessors in Office, with their Lieutenants; but I could not gett the “ Paynter downe this sommer, nor could I gett Mr. Somersett’s 1 helpe “ for the perfecting of this Catalogue. The eldest and hardest halfe I “ have gone through. For deteyning it so long I begg your Lordshipp’s “ pardon,—and, if it stand with your Lordsbipp’s good liking, I will see “ the other halfe also finished. If any of the number be left out (as I sup- “ pose some omissions are) the reason is, because I durst not insert any “thing that was doubtfull.’ , Notwithstanding Dering’s “ pledge of his creditt,’’ a very large mass of the ancient Dover Eecords never found their way back from Surrenden. In 1844,1 discovered there a vast number of them, and although this ‘ Ports Domesday Book ’ was not among them, I found portions of very elaborate transcripts from it, inter alia, Stephen de Pencestre’s Laws for the Government of the Castle, and others which I have printed in ‘ Archteo- logia Cantiana.’ The compiler of a work on Dover Castle recently pub¬ lished, to whom 1 lent them, not for private publication, but for the ser¬ vice of the Kent Archieological Society, has nevertheless made free use of them. He gives no authority for them, nor names the sources whence he obtained them. It will add largely to the value of his compilation, should it reach a second edition, if he be enabled to state whence they were derived. I have, therefore, much gratification in here recording for him that I copied them from Sir Edward’s transcripts from the Dover Castle Domesday. About the year 1811, Sir Edward Dering the Grandfather, and imme¬ diate predecessor of the present Baronet, bequeathed his personalties to his younger son, to whom the ancient Library and vast store of MSS. collected by his ancestor in the time of Ch. I. thus passed in due course of Law. They were shortly afterwards sold. The late Mr. Thorpe was the largest purchaser, and they were soon dispersed. The most valuable portion of the MS. Chartularies, and similar MSS. have, I am informed, been secured for the collection of Sir Thomas Phillipps. If this infor¬ mation be correct, there, in all probability, is now deposited the ‘Ports Domesday Book’ of which we are speaking. The collection which I found at Surrenden was still large and valuable—it consisted almost en¬ tirely of ancient Eolls and Charters which the legatee of the personalities had suffered to remain at Surrenden, the books only attracting his atten- * tion. All have since been sold by auction by Messrs. Puttick and Simpson, in three several sales, the last of which took place about a month since, viz. in July, 1865, when the Official Letter Book to which I have alluded was sold with the other remnants of this once grand collection. The Sale Catalogues of Messrs. Puttick and Simpson for Eeb. 7, 1863, and J uly 15, 1865, will testify to the large amount of Dover Castle muniments which had remained at Surrenden. But to return to the Services of the Five Ports. In the ‘Ked Book of the Exchequer ’ is the following Eecord, which must, of course, be deemed the most official and authentic document to which we can refer:— “ Quinque Poetus, et eorum membra, cum serviciis Eegi debitis de “ portubus predictis annuatim, cum necesse fuerit. “ Memorandum quod in octabis Sancti Hillarii, anno regni Eegis Ed- “ wardi, filii Eegis Henriei, vicesimo primo (sic). Stepiiano de Pencestbe, “tunc Constabulario Dovoeeie, et Constabulario Quinque Portuum ex- “istente, in Scaccario, super Compoto suo Ballive sue predicte, coram 1 I. e. Philipott, Somerset Herald, a great friend and fellow-labourer of Derm APPENDIX. Quinque “Magistro Willelmo de March, tunc Thesaurario Scaccarii, et Baroni- Pobtus. “ bus ejusdem Scaccarii; ipsoque Stepiiano plenius allocuto de predietis “ quinque portubus, videlicet, Qui fuerunt portus, et que eorura membra, “et que seruicia ipsi portus Regi debeant, et qualiter, et quo modo. “ Idem Stefhanus, predictos Thesaurai'ium et Barones de premissis cer- “tificabat, in hunc modum. “Sussex, 1 Hasting est capitalis portus, cujus membra sunt, videlicet, “ Kascia. j Winchelse, Rye, Leucata de Peuenesse, et Bulwareheth, “ in Comitatu Sussexie ; Bekesburne, et Grencth, in Comitatu Kancie ; “ qui portus, cum suis membris predietis, debet invenire, ad sumonitionem “ Regis, viginti et unam naues. Et, in qualibet naui debent esse viginti “et unus homines, fortes, et apti, bene armati, et parati ad seruicium “ Eegis; Ita, tamen, quod sumonitio inde fiat, ex parte Eegis, per xl dies ante. “ Et, cum predicte naues, et homines in illis existentes, ad locum ilium “ uenerint, ad quern fuerint sumoniti, morabuntur ibidem in seruicio “ Eegis per quindecim dies, ad custus suos proprios. Et si Eex seruicio “ illorum post predietas xv dies indiguerit, seu ipsos ibidem amplius mo- “ rari voluerit, erunt naues ille, cum hominibus in illis existentibus, in “seruicio Eegis morantes, ad custus Eegis, quamdiu Eegi placuerit;— “videlicet, magister capiet yj d per diem, et Constabularius vj d per diem, et “ quilibet aliorum capiet iij d per diem. “Kancia. ROMENHALE, Portus Capitalis,—Y etds Romenhale, “ et Lyde, membra eiusdem; Qui Portus, cum suis membris, inueuiet Eegi “ quinque naues, in forma predicta. “Portus de HETH debet Eegi quinque naues, in forma predicta.” “DOTJORR est Portus Capitalis, cuius membra sunt,—viz. Fauer- “ sham, Folkestane, et Meegate. Debet portus iste, cum suis membris predietis xxi naues, in forma predicta. “SANDWICH’S est Portus Capitalis, cuius membra,—F ordwiz, “ Stonore, et Serre. Qui Portus, cum suis membris, debet Eegi, quinque “ naues, in forma predicta. “ Summa Seruicii Quinque Portum lvij naues.” On the Patent Roll, 33 Ed. III. pt. 3, m. 6, is an “Inspeximus ” of this certificate, to which is subjoined another certificate that Stephen de Peu- cestre had, in the 31 Ed. I. (sic, 31 JEd. J.), delivered into the Exchequer a Book in which the services of the 5 Ports are set out, corresponding with the above, but the respective portions of the Ports and their limbs are i given more in detail, from which it appears that the numbers assigned to j each were as follows:—Hastings, 3 ships; Pevensey, 1 ship; Bulwareth, Pette, and Iham, 1 ship; Bekesburne, 1 ship; Grencth, 2 men, with 2 oars ( auirons ); Rye, 5 ships; Winchelsea, 10 ships; Old and New Eomnev, 5 ships (on the Roll it is qatre, a clerical error for cinq, as the sum total proves); Heth, 5 ships; Dover, 19 ships; Folkestone, 1 ship; Faversham, 1 ship; Sandwich, Stonor, Fordwich, Dele, and Serre, 5 ships,—Total, 57. VI. SAGA et SOCA. With regard to the precise meaning of the words Saca and Soca, I have collected together from various authors all that seems necessary for their elucidation, and have set out in order their opinions, as follows:— g ACA “SACA.—(i.) “Libertatem sive potestatem significat, alicui a Domino “ Eege concessam, causas et querelas tractandi, sive cognoscendi,—audi- “endi, scilicet; et judicandi, forisfacturas sive mulctas exinde proventuras “ capiendo, intra Socam, vel Dominium, ejus.— Saca, enim, fluit a Saxonico “ pae, i. e. causa, lis, dissensio, accusatio .” (Wilkins in the Glossary at the end of his Leges Saxonica, p. 426.) (ii.) “ Sacha est, quod si quidlibet aliquem nominatim de aliquo calum- “niatus fuerit, et ille negaverit, forisfactura probationis, vel negationis (si “evenerit) sua erit.” (Laws of Edward the Confessor, No. 22.) After citing this law, Wilkins (Glossary, p. 426) adds— (iii.) “ Multo rectius, ni fallor, Clemens Eegnercs, in onomastico, apo- “ stolatui Benedictiuorum iu Anglia prefixa. “ Sacca vel Saccha est regale privi-leghorn, quo qiois gaudet in suo Manerio, “ circa placita et correctiones delinquentim." (iv.) “ Cognitio quam domiuus habet in Curia sua de causis litibusque “inter vassallos suos exorientibus.” (Spelman.) (v.) “Amongst the Franks or Saliques, certain Lawyers were called “ Sachibarones; because they were (say the Glossarists) saoharum, i. e. “ causarum, perili. Men skilful in Causes or Pleas. Scech, sive Sack, “ causa est de qua collitigatur. Sunt, ergo, Sachibarones, Jurisperiti, viri “ cordati ac prudentes, sacharum, seu controversinrum dirimendarum “seientes.” (Madox, History of the Exchequer, p. 133, note d— citing Wendelin. Glossar. Salicum, p. 175.) (vi.) “ The Jurisdiction of holding Pleas.” (Kelham.) (vii.) “The power and privilege of hearing and determining causes and “ disputes, levying forfeitures, and fines, executing laws, and administering “justice within a certain precinct.” (Sir H. Ellis, Introduction to Domesday Book.) Which observations are, iu fact, an almost literal rendering of the passages cited above from Wilkins. (viii.) “The privilege called Sake is, for a man to have amerciaments of “ his Tenants in his own Court.” (Les Termes de La Ley—citing Keloway', Casus incerli temp or is, f. 145 a.) SOCA.—(i.) “Territorium, prmcinctum, in quo Saca, et emtera privi- “legia exercentur.” (Wilkins in Glossary, ut supra, p. 427.) Among the Laws of Edward the Confessor—xxiij. “ Quid sit Soche et “ Sache &c.,” we have— (ii.) “ Soche est, quod si aliquis qu&rit aliquid in terra sua, etiara fur- “ turn, sua est justicia, si inventum fuerit an non.” (iii.) Again, among the laws of Edward the Confessor, in the chapter “ Do animalibus et alia re inventa,” there is this clause:— "Si Dominus, in cujus terra inventum est, non habet consuetudines “ suas, scilicet Sake et Soke, omnia tradat Priefecto Ilundredi (si habere “ voluerit) cum bonis testibus.—Sed si Dominus habuerit consuetudines “suas, in Curia Domini rectum teneatur.” (Wilkins, ‘Leges Edwardi,’xxviii. p. 202.) Wilkins, in his Glossary (p. 427), citing this Law, observes— “ Vocis igitur expositionem in Legibus Edwardo Confessori attributis, “ cap. 23, ut nimis arctam, ne dicara incongruam, rejiciendam puto. Multo “rectius meo quidem judicio, Fleta, lib. i. cap. 47. So7ce (inquit) signi- “ ficat libertatem Curiee tenentium, quam Solcam appellamus. Cui convenit “ Codex quidam MS. Ecclesiaj Gantuariensis, Soke auer framiche court de “ ses hommes, i. e. liberam habere Curiam de suis homiuibus. Vel, ut “alter Codex antiquus MS., Not a,—quod Sok est queedam libertas, per “ quam Domini tenebunt Curias suas, et habebunt seclam homagiorum ."— “Nonne, autem, hinc confunduntur Soca et cousors ejus Saca? —Minime, “ cum in hoc ni fallor, signanter differunt, quod territorium, prmcinctum “in quo Saca et emtera privilegia exercentur, Soca prmcipue sonat;— Saca, “ autem, cum emteris, scilicet, Tol, — Tim, — Infangthefe, etc., privilegia ipsa, “ sive privilegioruin species, intra idem territorium exercendas. “A Soca autem hac, sensu quo privilegium, immunitatem, libertatem, “ signat, venit terraruin ilia apud nos possessionis species Sockagium alias “ Socagium dicta, sumpto hinc nomine, quod terra eo modo possessa (sub “certis, scilicet, et nominatis servitiis, in pacto inter Dominum et Vassal- “lum ejus conventu, contentis) a quibuscuuque aliis oncribus immunis sit “ et libera.” Thus far Wilkins on the confusion of the terms Soca and Saca. They | certainly are used indifferently by many writers to imply the Franchise | granted to the Lord, to hold Pleas of Court within his Manor, and so they j well may be used;—for, although it appears from the numerous authorities cited in this Note, that, strictly speaking, Saca is the privilege of holding Pleas, and Soca, the district wherein this privilege is exercised, yet the one, of necessity, implies the other. The Saca, the privilege, could not be exercised elsewhere than within the Manor or precinct of the Lord to whom it was granted;—and the Soca, the precinct itself, within which the privi¬ lege was to be exercised, necessarily implied the existence of that privilege; and so it was, that Soca was almost as often used as Saca, to denote the privilege itself. (iv.) “ Archiepiscopi, Episcopi, Comites, Barones, et Milites suos, et “proprios servieutes suos, scilicet, Dapiferos, Pinceruas, Camerarios, “ Cocos, Pistores, sub suo fridborgo habebant; et ipsi suos armigeros, vel “ alios servieutes suos, sub suo fridborgo; quod si ipsi forisfacerent, et “ clamor viciuorum iusurgeret de eis, ipsi baberent eos ad rectum in Curia | “ sua, si baberent Sacham et Socha-m, tol et theam.” (Leges Eegis Edwardi ! Confessoris, cap. xxi. apud Thorpe; Descriplio Liberlatum Diversarum, vol. i. p. 451.) For explanation of Fridborga, see Appendix, sub Gilda, infra. (v.) “The district over which the jurisdiction of Saca was exercised.” (Kelham.) (vj.) “The territory, or precinct, in which the Saca and other privileges “ were exercised.” (Sir H. Ellis, Introduction to Domesday Book, i. pp. 151, 273.) This, again, is a literal translation of the passage cited above from Wilkins. (vij.). “It signifies power or liberty to minister justice and execute ii j aw g_ a i SOj _the circuit or territory wherein such power is exercised; “ whence our law-Latin word Soca is used for a Seignory or Lordship en- “ f ra nchised by the King, with the liberty of holding or keeping a court of “ his Sole men.” (Jacob.) APPENDIX. (viij.) “ Soca vero placitormn alia prop vie pertinet ad fiscum regium, et “ singulariter; alia participaeione; alia pertinet Vieecomitibus et Ministris “ Eegis, in firma sua; alia pertinet Baronibus SocJtam et Sacharn htiben- “ tibus.” Leges Henrici Primi, apud Thorpe, cap. ix.; De qualitale causa- rum, yoI. i. p. 518.) (ix.) “ Archiepiscopi, Episcopi, Comites, et alie potestates, in terris “potestatis sue, Sacam et Socam habent, Tol et Theam, et infongentheaf.” (Leges Henrici Primi, apud Thorpe, cap. xx.; De Socna et Thol et Theam, vol. i. p. 52S.) (x.) “ Si exurgat placitum inter hominus alicujus Baronum, Socnam ha- “bentium, traetetur placitum in curia domini sui, de causa communi. Si “ est inter homines duorum dominoruin Socnam habendum, respondeat ae- “cusatus in Curia domini sui, de causa communi.” (Leges Henrici Primi, apud Thorpe, cap. xxv.; De privilegiis Proceruin Angiie, vol. i. p. 530.) (xi.) Eadweard of Wessex, in 90-1, transferred his royal rights in Taunton, to the See o'f Winchester. “ He says, ‘ Concessi, ut episcopii homines, tarn nobiles quam ignobiles “ [i. e. xii. hynde and ii. hynde) in praifato rure degentes, hoc idem jus in “ omni haberent dignitate (bad) quo llegis homines perfruuntur, regalibus “ fiscis eommorantes: et omnium siccularum rerum judicia ad usus prse- “ sulum exerceantur eodem modo quo regalium negotiorum discutiuntur ‘‘judicia.—Preediet® etiam vilke mercimonium quod Anglice clas tunes “ (typing appellatur, censusque omnis civilis, sanctse dei mcclesi® in Win- “touia civitate sine retractionis obstaculo, cum omnibus commodis “mternaliter deserviat.’” (Cod. Dipl. No. 1084.) “He had previously granted au immunity from regal and eomitial inter¬ ference; the result of which was to place all judicial and fiscal functions “ in the hands of the Bishop’s Eeeve, instead of the Sheriff or the King’s “ Burgreeve. “ The document furnishes an admirable example of an immunity, or, as “ it is technically called in the Anglo-Saxon law, a grant of Sacn and Socn.” (Kemble, The Saxons in England, vol. i. p. 177, note.) (xij.) “Manerium, dominium, locus privilegio et immuuitate Socce do- “natus.” (Ducange in verbo.) (xiij.) “ Soca, pro manerio vel dominio. Eegistr. Pr. Lewes, p. 1. Hi “ sunt reddilm de Socha de Hecham. Et mox ibidem sequuntur, redditus “ totius manerii de Hecham. Item, p. 16— Pertinent ad Socliam de He- “ chant, tarn in Sernebruna et Etune et Ringstede, quam in ipsa villa de He- “ chain. Et, p. 17. In Soca de Hecham sunt 24 Lancetce. Denique, “ p. IS. Et faciet alias consuetudines cum Socha, quod quispiam forte in- “tellexerit, cum aratro; nobis, autem, videtur significare secundum con- “ suetudinem manerii , scilicet, uti omnes alii tenentes faciunt. “ Soca. —Id quod francbisiam dicimus, id est, locusprivilegiatus, libertas, “ mmunitas, refugium, asylum, sanctuarium. Hinc, maneria et dominia, “ qu;c aliis potestates appellautur, Socce, etiam, antiquis dicta; sunt,—ut “ jam supra indicaviinus. Hoc sensu, maneriorum partes, qua; a capitali “sunt disjunct®,— Socas et Sobies multis, bodie, in locis nomiuantur, “illud, scilicet, denotantes, quod sunt illius libertatis partes, cujus deuo- “minationem pr® se ferunt. Sic villa; in comitatu Norfolcie, qua; dicun- “ tur in Soca de Oressenhal, sunt de libertate illius manerii:—et sic de “reliquis.” (Spelman in verbo.) xi v. “ Soca is always distinguished from demesne land, inland, or thaneland. “The Conqueror, directing that invaded lands should be restored to Ely “ minster, says, Let those who hold the inlandes which undoubtedly should “ be held of the Church, malce the best agreement which they can with the “ Abbot ... let the same be done concerning those holding Soo AND Sac. “ (Hist. Elien. ii. 120.) These strange syllables ‘Soc and Sac ’ had a shade “ of difference in their meaning. Our ancestors were fond of alliteration; “and some of their jingles aro still used; for example, health and wealth, “ wear and tear. Sac appears to be our common word sake, with the force “ of placitum or causa, and to mean the correction of offences, or power of “ imposing penalties. ‘ Dioit quod rations de Sok, intend'd habere sectam “ ‘ omnium tenentium suorum, tarn liberorum quam villanorum ; et ratione de “ * Sak, intendit habere emendationem omnium delictorum.’ ” (Quo Warranto 3 Ed. III.)—(Morgan, ‘ England under the Normans,’ p. 129.) All the authorities, then, after all, confirm the statement made in Note 7, p. 153 supra, —that the term Saca signifies the privilege of holding pleas; and that Soca was the territory within which the privilege was exercised; and that the franchise of “Saca et Soca” was a grant made by the Crown to Lords of Manors, authorizing them to hold their own Courts and administer justice therein. Indeed, in early times, a manor was rarely, if ever, grauted without the annexation of a civil and criminal jurisdiction. Thence, doubtless, arose the term “ Socage tenure,” whereby the tenants within the Soc, i. e. the Lord’s territory, held of their Lord by fealty, Saoa homage, suit of court, etc., and certain specified services, such as money rents, or fixed prmdial services, etc., as distinguished from military or knight service, wherein the render was precarious and uncertain, besides the liability to the further incidents of aids, primer-seisin, wardships, marriages, etc. etc.; and they stood to right among themselves in their lord's court (see notes iii. and iv., p. 7*, supra). But it would be out of place to enter further into these subjects here; nor should. I have at all alluded to them had not our discussions on the terms Sac and Soc led us to notice that of Socage. It seems as though this tenure by free and common Socage had remained a relic of Saxon liberty after the Conqueror had established feudal tenures; and to have been retained, as Blackstone remarks, by such persons as had neither forfeited their estates to the King, nor been obliged by him to exchange their tenure for the more honourable, as it was called, but, at the same time, more burthensome tenure of knight-service. New grants, after the Conquest, were almost invariably made of lands and manors to be held by this latter service. In the text, Note 7, p. 32,1 spoke, in passing, of other powers than those of Saca and Soca which were probably granted to Dover in this Charter It is evident by the Custumal of Dover, printed by Lyon, that from time immemorial, the burgesses had had committed to them the power of life and death,—a power which properly belonged only to the Scyremot, i. e. the county court. When that power was conferred dees not appear; probably by this very charter in which the franchise of Saca and Soca was given to them. According to Jealce, citing the Custumals and Eecords of Hastings and Wlnchelsea, those two ports had always had the right of trying felons; and, in the original Custumal of Pevense, lately among the MSS. at Surrenden, not only is it recorded that its burgesses had the power of life and death, but the very form of passing the sentence of death is set out,—aud also, the manner of carrying it into execution,—in these words, which I have copied from the MS.:— “Item, en cas [de jugment] de eoronne, si homme soit ateynt, e for- “ fait la vye, le portreve, come coroner, dirra le jugement, e sera assys “juxte le senescal, e dirra cestez paroles, scilicet: * Wypdrajp and axe “ 1 pane prest.’ E si cely qest dampne soit de la franchise, il sera amene “au pount de la ville, a la pleigne meer, e outr le pount botu en le havene. “ E sil soit del Geldable, sera suspendez deyns la Lewe, en certain lui “appelle le Wrhjtrew.” Indeed, it appears from all the Custumals of the five ports, and their limbs, that all of them had the power of life and death. It is true that, in the Charter of Edward I. confirming the franchises enjoyed by the Five Ports in the times of Edward the Coneessor, ■William I., William II., Henry II., Eichard I., John, and Henry III. (“ per cartas eorundem, sicut cart® ill® quas iidem barones nostri “ inde habent, et quas inspeximus, rationabiliter testantur; ” i. e. by their “ charters, as the same charters, which the same our barons thereof have, “ and ice have seen, do reasonably testify ”), there is this reservation:— “ Salva semper in omnibus regia dignitate, et salvis nobis, et hmredibus “ nostris, placitis eoronis nostra;, vit® et membrorum; ” i. e. saved always, in all things, our kingly dignity, and saved to us and our heirs pleas of our crown, life, and members. But Jeake satisfactorily determines it, that the pleas of life and mem¬ bers here mentioned are, not all capital offences, but only those special ones which, before this charter of King Edward I., had been determinable at the Court of Shepway, and no other. In the Confirmation Charter, 5 Ed. IV., there are actually these words:— “ Ac insuper concessimus, pro nobis et h®redibus nostris, quantum in “ nobis est, prcedictis baronibus et probis hominibus ac eorum hmredibus et “ successoribus, quod ipsi furcas, infra quemlibet portura, et merabrum “ portuum et membrorum priedictoruin erigi, et judicium de malefactoribus, “quos ididein capi et deprehendi contigerit, juxta dictam libertatem de “ iufangtheff et utfangtheff, ac juxta consuetudinem in portubus et menibris “prcedictis ab antiquo usitatam facerepossint,” etc. I. e. “ And moreover, we have granted for us and our heirs, as much as “ in us is, to the aforesaid barons and good men, and their heirs and suc- “ cessors, that they may erect gallows, within every port and member of “ the P° rts . and members aforesaid, and judgment cause to be done of ma¬ lefactors which there shall happen to be taken and apprehended, “ according to the said liberty of iufangtheff and utfangtheff, and ac¬ cording to the custom iu the ports and members aforesaid, of ancient “ time used.” Even so, there are those living now in Dover who remember public executions within the liberties of the town, after trial before their own Eecorder and Mayor, and by the sentence of their own court. APPENDIX. I’ltKPOSITOS — GeBEFA- Eeve. Gebefa. Heahge- BEFA. . VII. PREPOSITUS—GEREFA—REVE. For the better understanding what the office of “ Prepositus ” (the Anglo-Saxon Gerefa, Angliee Reve) was, I will here collect together the opinions of different authors who have discussed the subject. Mr. Thorpe, in his Glossary, says—“ Of Prtepositi there were evidently “ two kinds; viz. the ‘ Prepositus Regius,’ who seems to have been next in “authority to the Alderman of the Hundred; and the ‘ Prepositus’ of a “ lord, who was a Steward or Bailiff of an estate, answering to the Anglo- “ Saxon ‘ Wicnere.’ ” Of “ Gerefa ,” he says, “ Of Reeves, mention of the following classes oc- “ curs in these laws:— “ 1. The Gerefa, by which simple denomination the same official seems “ to be meant who is elsewhere called the ‘ Scir-gerefa,’ or Sheriff. He “ was the fiscal officer of the Shire or County, or City, under the Ealdor- “ man, or Comes. His duties were many, as a reference to the places “ where his name occurs will abundantly testify. The King's ‘ Gerefa’ was “ probably identical with the ‘ Scir-gerefa.’ The Court of the Reeve was “ held monthly. In the Anglo-Norman times he is usually styled Vice- “ comes. “2. TheTun-greviu3— Tun-gerefa; 3. ThePort-gerefa— Port-Reeve; 4. “ The Wie-gerefa— Wick-Reeve; inferior classes of fiscal officers employed, “ as their names imply, in the Towns, Ports, and Wicks (Hamlets) of the “ Kingdom.” (Thorpe, ‘ Glossary to Anglo-Saxon Laws,’ vol. ii.) In the Laws of Edward the Confessor there is a chapter expressly de¬ voted to the explanation of these terms, as follows:— “ Cap. xxxii.— Quid sit Prepositus et Prefegtura, et quid Al¬ derman, qui Latine Senior Pofuli sonat, et quam xiultipliciter “VOCABULUM pREPOSITI DISTENDITUIt. “ Greve autem nomen est potestatis; apud nos autem nichil melius “ videtur esse quam prefectura. Est enim multiplex nomen; greve enim “ dicitur de scira, de wapentagiis, de hundredo, de burgis, de villis; et vide- “ tur nobis compositum esse e gri'5 Angliee, quod est pax Latine, et ve “ Latine, videlicet, quod debet facere griS, i. e. pacem, ex illis qui iuferunt, “ in terram ve, i. e. miseriam, vel dolorem, summa auctoritate Domini nostri “ Jesu Christi dicentis ‘ ve tibi Bethsaida, ve tibi Corozaim.’ Frisones et “ Flaudrenses comites suos meregrave vocant, quasi majores, vel bonos “pacificos; et sicut modo vocantur groves qui habent prefecturas super “ alios, ita tunc temporis vocabantur elderemen, non propter senectutem, “ sed propter sapienciam.” In reference to this chapter, Kemble well observes:— “ The laws of Edward the Confessor show at how early a period the word “ was unintelligible.” He devotes a chapter to the subject, from which it may be advisable to transcribe a few passages. He commences his observa¬ tions thus:— “ The most general name for the fiscal, administrative, and executive “ officer among the Saxons was * Gerefa,’ or, as it is written in very early “ documents, 1 Geroefa,’ but the peculiar functions of the individuals com- “ prehended under it were further defined by a prefix compounded with it, “ as ‘ Scirgerefa,’ the Reeve of the Shire or Sheriff, ‘ Tungerefa,’ the Reeve “ of the Farm, or Bailiff. The exact meaning and etymology of this name “ have hitherto eluded the researches of our best scholars, and yet, per- “ haps, few words have been more zealously investigated. . . . Whatever “ were the original signification of the word, I cannot doubt that it is of “ the highest antiquity, as well as the office which it denotes. In all pro- “ bability it was borne by those elected chiefs who presided over the free- “ men of the Ga in their meetings, and delivered the law to them in their “ districts. RUguntur in iisdem conciliis et principes, qui jura per pagos “ vicosque reddunt. (Tac. Germ, xii.) Some tribes may have called these “principes by one name, some by another,—‘ Ealdorman,’ c vEsaga,’ ‘ Lah- “ mon,’ are all legitimate appellations for a ‘ Gerefa.’—Throughout the “ Germanic constitutions, and especially in this country, the ‘ Gerefa’ “ always appears in connexion with judicial functions. He is always the “holder of a Court of Justice. . . . Upon this point it is unnecessary to “multiply evidence, and I shall content myself with saying that wherever “ there was a Court there was a Reeve, and wherever there was a Reeve “ he held some sort of Court for the guidance and management of persons “ for whose peaceful demeanour he was responsible. From this it is to be “inferred that the ‘ Gere fan’ were of very different qualities, possessed “ very different degrees of power, and had very different functions to per- “ form, from the ‘ Gerefa’ who gave law to the Shire, down to the ‘ Gerefa’ “ who managed some private landowner’s estate. It will be convenient to “ take the different classes of ‘ Cerefan’ seriatim, and collect under each “ head such information as we can now obtain from our legal or historical “ monuments.” I. Heahgerefa, or High Reeve.—Kemble expresses himself as unable to speak witli certainty on this subject. “ I am inclined to believe,” he says, “ that they are exceptional, and, perhaps, in some degrees, similar to the Missi of the Franks. Officers dispatched under occasional commis¬ sions to perform functions of supervision, hold courts of appeal, and dis- “ charge other duties, as the necessity of the case demanded ; but that they “are not established officers found in all the districts of the kingdom, and “ forming a settled part of the machinery of government. In this par- “ ticular sense, our judges going down upon their several circuits, under a “ commission of jail delivery, are the Heahgerefan of our day.” .... II. Scirgerefa, or Sheriff.—“ The Scirgerefa is, as his name denote^ Scirgerefa. “ the person who stands at the head of .the Shire.He is, properly Sheriff. “ speaking, the holder of the County Court, Scirgemot, or Folcmot, and, “ probably, at first, was its elected chief. But, as this Gerefa was, at first, “ the people’s officer, he seems to have shared the fate of the people, and to “ have sunk in the scale ns the royal authority gradually rose. During the “whole of our historical period, we find him exercising only a concurrent “jurisdiction, shared in, and coritrolled by, the Ealdorman, on the one “ hand, and the Bishop on the other.In the Anglo-Saxon legisla- “ tion, even of the eighth century, the Ealdorman is certainly head of the “ Shire; but there is, as far as I know, no evidence of his sitting in judg- “ ment in the Folcmot, without the Sheriff'; while there is evidence that “ the Sheriff sat without the Ealdorman.” The remainder of Kemble’s remarks on this office I defer till we come to speak of the “ Vicecomes,” as he is called in the Survey, and of the Scir- mote itself. III. Cyninges Gerefa, or Royal Reeve.—“There is some difficulty Ctninges “ with regard to this officer, because, in many cases where the Cyninges Gerefa. “ Gerefa is mentioned, it is plain that the Scirgerefa is meant. For ex- “ ample, iElfred twice mentions the Cyninges Gerefa as sitting in the Folc- “ mot, and administering justice there, which is hardly to be understood “ of any but the Sheriff. However, it is consistent with the general prin- “ ciples of Teutonic society, that, as there was a Scirgerefa to do justice “ between freeman and freeman, so also there should be a Cyninges Gerefa, “before whom the King’s tenants should ultimately stand to right, and “ who more particularly administered the King’s Sacu and Socn in his own “ private lands. To this officer, under the Ealdorman, would belong the “ investigation of those causes which the King’s manorial courts could not “ decide; perhaps, he might possess some sort of appellate jurisdiction ; and “ it cannot be doubted, that it was his duty to superintend the management “ of the King’s private domains, and to lead the array of the King’s private “ tenants in the general levy. It is, therefore, not unlikely that this officer “ may be identical with the Heahgerefa already noticed. But, in many “ cases where a King’s Reeve is mentioned [Regis Pnepositus] and where “ we cannot understand the term of the Scirgerefa, it is clear, that a Wie- “gerefa, or Burli, or Tun-gerdfa, are intended; and that they are called “ royal officers merely because the "Wic, Burh, or Tun, happened to be “ royal property.” .... IV. The Burhgerefa.—“ In a fortified town, which I take to be the Burhge- “ strict meaning of Burh, there was an officer under this title. We know befa. “ but little of bis peculiar powers; but there is every reason to conclude “ they were similar to those of other 1 Gerefan,’ according to the eircura- “ stances in which he was placed. If the town were free, it is possible that “ he may have been the popular officer, a sort of Sheriff where the town “itself is a county. But this is improbable, and it is much more likely “ that the ‘ Burhgerefa’ was essentially a royal officer, charged with the “ maintenance and defence of a fortress.It was this officer’s duty “ to preside in the Burhgemot, which was appointed to be held thrice in “ the year, and he was most likely the representative of the townspeople, “ so far as these were unfree, in the higher courts. It is also probable that “ he was their military leader, and that he was expected to be present at “ sales and exchanges, in order to be able to warrant transactions if im- “ peached. Lastly, he was to see that tithes were duly rendered from his “ fellow-citizens.The ‘ Burhgerefa’ may, perhaps, be said to have “ had some of the rights of the JEdile and Prietor Urbauus under the old, “ or those of the Duumvir under the later, provincial constitution of Rome. “ Still, he seems to have been, in some degree, subject to the supervision “ of the Ealdorman. . . . We have no means now of ascertaining the dura- “ tion of his office, the nature of his appointment, or the actual extent of “ his powers.” V. “ The Portgerefa is, in many respects, similar to the ‘ Burhgerefa’: Pobt- “ but, as it appears that Port is applied rather to a commercial than a gebefa. “ fortified town, there are differences between the two officers. In some “ degree, these will have depended upon the comparative power, freedom, “ and organization of the citizens themselves. ... In London he holds “ the place of the Sheriff, and the King’s writs are directed to the Earl, “ the Bishop, and the Portreeve. There are two cities in which we hear « of ‘ Portreeves,’ viz. London and Canterbury. In the former, we have “ Swetman, uElfsige, Ulf, Leofstati, and the great officer of the royal « household, Esgar the Steallere, which alone would be sufficient evidence “ of the importance attached to the post. In Canterbury, we read of “ yEthelred, Leofstan, and Godric, occupying the same station. “ In the smaller towns especially, it must have been a principal part of the 9* APPENDIX. “ Portreeve’s duty to witness all transactions by bargain and sale. A “ portion of his subsistence at least was probably derived from the pro- “ eeeds of tolls and fines levied within his district.” Wicgerefa. VI. Wicoerefa.—“ The Wicgerefa was a similar oflicer in villages,” etc. I am not aware of any mention of this officer in our Kent Survey, and, therefore, need not follow out Mr. Kemble’s observations on his rank and jurisdiction. Tungerefa. VII. Tungerf.fa.—“ The Tungerefa is, literally, the reeve of a tun, en¬ closure, farm, vill, or manor; and his authority, also, must have fluctu- “ ated with that of his lord. He is the villicus or bailiff of the estate, and, “ on the royal farms, was bound to superintend the cultivation and keep “ the peace among the cultivators,” etc. Swan- VIII. Swangerefa.—“ The Swangerefa, as his name denotes, was Eeeve gebefa. “ o( that forest-court which, till a late period, was known in England as the “ Swainmoot. It was his business to superintend the swanas, or swains, “ the herdsmen, and foresters, to watch over the rights of pasture, and re- “ gulate the use which might be made of the forest.” We need not, however, proceed further in the description of this officer, as we do not meet with him iu the Kent Survey. Wealhge- IX. We Aim gerefa, or IVelsh Eeeve.—Eor the same reason we are befa. U0 ); ca ]l e d U pou to discuss the duties of this officer. “ The Gerefa was not necessarily a royal officer; on the contrary, we “ find Bishops, Ealdorraen, nay, simple nobles with them upon their esta- “ blishinent. Of course, the moment an immunity of Sacu and Soon existed “ upon any estate, the lord appointed a Gerefa to hold his court, and do “ right among his men, as the Scirgerefa held court for the freemen in his “ shire.Of course, iu many cases, these Gerefan would be merely “ stewards: but, in nearly all, we must consider them to have been judges “ iu various courts of greater or less importance, public or private, as it “ might chance to be. This one original character distinguishes all alike; “ whether it be the Scirgerefa of a county court, the Burhgerefa of a cor- “ poration, the Swangerefa of a woodland moot, the Motgerefa of any court, “ in which plea could be holden, or the Tungerefa of a vill or indepen- “ dent settlement, the ancient Steward of a manorial court.” (Kemble’s “ ‘ Saxons in England,’ vol. ii. p. 151 to p. 181.) Of the above different classes, the one with which we are ordinarily most familiar is the Tungerefa, the Eeeve or Bailiff of a manor. “ The Gerefa or Grieve. — Propositus villee was an important officer in “ those days, and it would seem that the tillage of the bordlands, as well “ as of the villenage, was often under his superintendence.” “ One of Chaucer’s pilgrims to Canterbury was a Eeeve, whose person, “ character, and abode, are minutely described by the poet:— “ The Eeeve was a slendre colerike man. . . . Wei coude he kepe a garner and a binne: There was non auditour coude on him winne. Wei wiste he by the drought, and by the rain, The yelding of his seed and of his grain. His lordes shepe, his nete and his deirie, His swine, his hors, his store, and his pultrie, Were holly in this reves goueruing. . . . His wonning was ful fayre upon an heth, With grene trees yshadewed.” . . . “ The claims and independent proceedings of the Beeves are occasionally “ noticed in Doomsday. In one case, we are told that the Eeeve, after an “ exchange, had kept possession of both objects of the transaction (p. 38 b). “. . . . Other passages relate to disputes between the Beeves and the “ Eoresters (p. 38 b). Still, it is not clear that all such entries refer to “ the Eeeve of the villenage, because 1 Prepositus,’ in Doomsday, is a name “ common to various officers; we meet with Prepositus Eegis, Prepositus “ Bwgi, Prepositus Bundrcdi, just as there are Shire Beeves, Portreeves, “ andWoodreeves now.” (Morgan, ‘England under the Normans,’ p. 92.) We have an instance of the dishonest exactions of the Portreeve of Canterbury. See Extension, p. 5,1. 42. And now, having fully discussed the offices held by the different classes of “ Gerefa,” during the Saxon era, we ought not to close the inquiry without a few words on the position of a lower class of Propositus, viz. the individual who, under the Custos or Steward, had the superintendence of the prsedial labour of his fellow-villans. We find no notice of this office in our Kent Domesday, but in later manorial rolls it is of constant occur¬ rence ; and, as many writers have confounded it with the office of Eeeve, and thence deemed that the Propositus of Domesday was always one of the Yillans, we will pause awhile to describe the nature of the office. When w r e have the Pnepositus named in ancient records as one of the Yillans, he assuredly was not the Eeeve, but merely a sub-officer of the manor, an elected foreman of his class, serving under the Senescallus, or even under the Ballivus. I have remarked, Note 10, p. 153 supra, that in the few instances which we have of the term Propositus in the Kent Survey, that officer could not have been a Villan. There are only eight passages in which the term 10 * occurs, which I here adduce in proof of my assertion as to the rank or position of the official therein named :— 1. Extension, p. 2, 1. 15,— hide Propositus Regis accipiebat emenda- tionem. 2. Do. p. 2, 1. 23,— Propositus inde reddit liiij libras. 3. Do. p. 6, 1. 39,— Sequitur ilium Propositus Regis. 4. Do. p. 6, 1. 42,— Quidam Propositus Brumannus nomine. In each of these eases the Propositus must have been the official de¬ scribed above as the Portgerefa, or Portreeve. 5. Extension, p. 8, 1. 10,— Propositus vero Francigena. Here he must have been the official described above as Tungerefa, tiie Eeeve of the Manor, or, as this manor was of the ltoyal Demesne, he would perhaps have been styled Cyninges Gerefa. (See supra, No. III.) 6. Extension, p. 8, 1. 20,— Alestan Proposito Lundunio. Unquestion¬ ably the Propositus of this passage was a Portgerefa, or Portreeve. 7. Extension, p. 9, 1. 12,— Vicecomiti dal Propositus xij libras. In this passage, the Propositus must have been a Tungerefa, or, as in the case of Dnrtford, this being a Eoyal Manor, he may have been styled Cyninges Gerefa. 8. Extension, p. 14, 1. 47,— Tamen Propositus reddit, etc. This must have been the Reeve of the Archbishop’s Manor of Newenden —his Tungerefa. He could hardly have been one of the Villan Propositi whom we shall presently describe—a mere foreman of the Villans—but must have been the head officer and manager of the manor— The Reeve. It is probable that, in these instances, the Propositus could not by any possibility have been a Villan. He was either the head officer in the government of a Town or Port, or The Reeve, i. e. the Steward of the Manor, holding its Courts, and presiding over all its Officials and Tenants. It will give us a clearer iusight into the real position of a Villan Pro¬ positus, if I adduce a few Eecords, aud other evidences, wherein such an officer is apparently intended to be described. 1. Baron Maseres, in his IListorite Anglicano Monumenta, p. 382, gives a transcript of the grant of the Manor of Spalding in Lincolnshire, a.d. 1051, with all the rents, services, etc. The following passage occurs as part of the grant:— “ Scilicet, Colgrinum Praposilum meum, et totam sequelam suarn, cum “ omnibus bonis et catallis quas habet in dicta Villa, et in campis ejus et “ mariscis, absque aliquo de omnibus retinemento.” 2. But, as this is a quotation from Ingulphus, whose authority we have been taught to question, it may be more satisfactory to furnish one from undoubtedly authentic sources. Dugdale cites, from the Registry of Burton Lazars in Leicestershire, a charter of Confirmation of Sir William Burdet K‘ of grants made by his ancestors to the hospital of Burton Lazars, aud among them one granting— “ Totam terram quam habui, vel habere potui; vel quse ad me, vel ad “ lucredes meos de jure possit de cretero deseendere, in villa et in territorio “ de Neuton juxta Louseby cum omnibus pertinentiis suis, scilicet eapitale “ mausum meum in eadem villa cum quatuor virgatis terras, de dominico “ meo, cum pertinentiis suis, et totum boscum meum, quod vocatur Swine- “lond, et Kobertum Proposi/uni, —Eicardum de la Lane,—Willielmum “ de Barkeby, et Agnetem relictam Galfridi Hert, custumarios meos, cum “totis eorum sequelis, et omnibus catallis eorum, cum quatuor virgatis “ terras, quas dicti custumarii, cum toftis suis, de me tenuerunt in villen- “ agio, cum omnibus redditibus, homagiis, serviciis, et sectis Curife libere “tenentiuin ineorum in dicta villa de Neutou, wardis, releviis, maritagiis, “ escaetis, pratis, pascuis, pasturis,” etc. This recited charter bears no date. The Confirmation is dated at Louseby, “ die Lume proximo ante festum S. Margaret® Virginia, anno regni Eegis Edwardi xxvi.”—i. e. 1298. (See Dugdale’s ‘ Monasticon,’ ed. 1849, vol. vi. pt. 2, p. 633.) It is clear that the Propositus in the above quotations from Baron Maseres and Dugdale, who is represented as sold, with his rents and chat¬ tels, etc., held a very different office from that of the Reeve or Steward of the Manor. In fact, he was a Villan, the foreman of his class by election, as we shall presently see. The alienator of the manors in question is giving the list of the tenants who are bound to the customary services of the Demesne, in agricultural labour, and begins with their foreman. 3. In the Survey of the Manor of St. Paul’s, a.d. 1279, as described by Archdeacon Hale ( Domesday of St. Paul's, p. xxxvi.), it appears that a foreman of the labourers was annually elected by the Villata, and he was styled “ Propositus ,” i. e. the foreman placed over them. This, I conceive, was the official who is so designated iu these alienations. The real “ Eeeve,” the Steward or Manager of the Manor, receiver of the rents, as powerful as the Lord himself, and infinitely more arbitrary, could never by any possibility have been a “Villan;” and the designation “Propositus,” in these passages, merely signifies one placed over the others of his class, a position not much, if at all, higher than that of our modern Bailiff. Eleta, who wrote tempore Edw. I., thus describes the Propositus of his day:— “ Pnepositus, autem, tanquam appruator et cultor optimus, per villatam APPENDIX. “ electus ad praposituram, Domino, vel ejus Senescallo, pnlam debet pra- “ sentari, eui injungatur offieium illud indilate. Non, ergo, sit piger vel t; Bomnolentus, sed efficaciter et continue commodum Domini adipisci nita- “ tur, et exarare, carucasque intrinsecas et extrinseeas mane conjungi, “ terrasque conjunctim et pure arari, puroque semine, nec minus sparse “ dispergi faciat et seminari, fimum etiam nutriri et eoadunari, ad stereu- “ linium cum terra fiinumque (sic) mixtum faciat exaltari.” (Fleta, lib. ii., cap. 76, s. 1.) As far as tbe duties of liis office are concerned, according to this passage, they are such as belong to our modern Farm-Bailiff. For the remainder of the different duties which be has to perform, I refer the reader to Appendix NX., sub tit. “ Manerium.” 4. Similar to the duties here set out by Fleta, are those which appear to have been assigned to the Prcepositus in the following quotation from a Kegistry of the Priory of Christ Church, Canterbury, tempore Edw. I., in the British Museum :— “Item injungatur Prceposito, quod omnes minutos defectus, tarn in “ co-operturis domorum et murorum, quam clausuris circa domos et curias “ nemora, campos, pasturas, et alia reparari faciat, sumptibus Conventus “ infra terminum competentem eis assignandum, alioquin, Custodes liujus, “ termino elapso, omnes tales defectus reparari faciant sumptibus Prmpo- “ sitorum.” (See Additional MSS. 6160. Pegistrum Prioris Eeelesie Christi Canluarie f. 101. b.) The above is from a series of Instructions, ( ordinaiiones ) to the “ Custodes” of their manors, drawn up at an audit held at Easter, a.d. 1300. Inasmuch as the Prcepositus was to receive orders from the Custos, he was certainly no Peeve. From the nature of the duties assigned to these Custodes themselves in the Instructions before us, such as seeing to the fattening of stock, marling the land, etc., per totarn cuslodiam suam, it would seem that even they were hardly in the position of Peeves, but rather of Bailiffs; and this accords with the gradations in office assigned by Fleta {ibid. cap. 72), viz.(1) the “ Se?iescallus,” or Beeve; (2) under him the Pallivus, and (3), under him the Prcepositus, who, in this case also, was elected by the tenants of the Ville as foreman of his class. From a reference made by Archdeacon Hale to a Survey of the Manors of St. Paul’s, a.d. 1279 (see Introduction to the Domesday of St. Paul's, p. xxxvi.), it would seem that “ certain of the tenants were compelled to “ accept this office, that it was an annual office, and that, while performing “ its duties, the tenant was exonerated from other services.” To avoid this compulsory appointment, on the part of the tenant, or to secure himself against the loss of his tenant’s pradial services, special agreements were sometimes made between the lord and his tenant to pro¬ vide against such contingencies, as appears by an entry on an original Court Boll of the Manor of Tregarrek, in the parish of Boche, in Cornwall, a.d. 1372, now open before me, in which Stephen Elde, Lord of Tregarrek, lets to John Guy, of Trefrank, three ferlings of land for fourteen years, at a rent of 12s. per annum, suit of court and mill, with three days’ work as “my” conventionary tenants are accustomed to do; and “the said John “ Guy shall not serve the office of Propositus, or Bedell, or Tollonarius." Among the Cotton MSS. is a Begister of the Priory of Bochester, in which are recorded the customs of their different manors ( circiter 13th cent.) From the Cunsuetudines de liedenlam et de Cudintune I extract the fol¬ lowing passage, as bearing upon the question before us:— “ Dominus faciet Prcepositum de illo qui tenet unarn virgatam terra, in “ die Sancti Martini. Et idem Prcepositus tenebit terram suam quietam “ ab omnibus, et habebit victum suum in Curia Domini. Et quaudo vadit “ in servieium pro villa de Hedenham extra quadrnginta hidas, habebit “ prebendam equo suo. Item habebit iiij boves in pastura Domini. “ Prapositus de Cudintune habebit unam virgatam terra, et defendet “ illam per prefecturam, et habebit iiij boves in pastura Domini. Et a “ festo Sancti Petri ad Vincula, usque ad festum Sancti Miehaelis, habebit “ octo bussellos frumenti, et octo denarios, et prebendam equo suo ad pre. “ dictum terminum.” These were clearly Villan Preepositi, and in accordance with Arch¬ deacon Hale’s statement, while executing their office, they were exonerated from any other Servitia. Although we find in the passage a regulation that the Lord of the Manor shall appoint this Prcepositus — Dominus faciet Prcepositum —it can hardly be taken as militating against the rule that that official should be elected by the Ville. Faciet, probably, signifies no more than the ratifying the choice of the Ville. Some apology is, perhaps, due to the reader, for the great extension of these remarks, ranging, as they do, through a period of more than three centuries, viz. from the Saxon era to the latter part of the fourteenth century. I hesitated long before I committed myself to this course, and only adopted it from the apparent necessity of exhausting the subject, owing to the countless and contradictory explanations of the term Prcepositus, that have been given by various writers. Indeed, Kemble’s remark, which I have cited above, in reference to the word Gerefa, that, at a very early period, it had become unintelligible, may well be applied]to its representative Prcejmsitus in later periods. On each occasion, when we meet with the term, much, in the interpretation of it, must be left to our own judgment, on comparing it with the context. We shall seldom err in assigning the term Prcepositus to its proper class among the nine different varieties of the office Gerefa, described by Kemble, unless it be in the class Tmgerefa. I believe that the best rule for our guidance will be to consider the term Prcepositus as one of very wide and general application,—to take it as a word primes intentionis, Prce-Fositus, one placed before, or above, or over any other official, or office; the office of which he has the superintendence, or the official over whom he may be placed, depending entirely on the case that may be under consideration. This rule will be decidedly applicable in the nine classes of Gerefa, described by Kemble; and when we descend to the lower classes of Prcepositus, the strict observation of it mil be found of prime importance; else the Tun- gerefa, the Peeve, will be confounded with the Villan Prcepositus, the mere foreman of his fellows; and there will be found many instances in which the term Prcepositus is used even for the Peeve himself, or even a higher official. The term should, therefore, be taken, as I have observed, in first intention —the presiding official ,—and the determination what that official may be must depend on the passage under consideration. In those eight in¬ stances of its occurrence in our Kent Survey, there can be no mistake; they are all clear and distinct, as high officials. We need hardly, therefore, perplex ourselves with the varieties of the Villan Prcepositus, unless it be to caution ourselves against confounding any one of these eighty with such lower office as that implies. FBITHBOBGA—FKANKPLEDGE. With regard to the FriSborg alluded to in Note 21, it will, I hope, be not Fhithborg; deemed out of place, if I here introduce a few passages from Mr. Kemble’s Fkank- 1 earned remarks on the Institution of the Tithing :— pledge. “ The form and nature of the Institution long known in the English law, “ under the name of ‘ Frankpledge,’ (*) may be compendiously described in “ the words of the laws called Edward the Confessor’s. ( 2 ) According to that “ document,— “ Another peace, the greatest of all, there is, whereby all are maintained “ in firmer state, to wit, in the establishment of a guarantee, which the “English call ‘FriSborgas,’ with the exception of the men of York, who “ call it ‘ Tenmannetale, 5 that is, the number of ten men; andjit consists in “ this, that, in all the vills throughout the kingdom, all men are bound to “ be in a guarantee by tens, so that if one of the ten men offend, the other “ nine may hold him to right. But, if he should flee, and they allege that “ they could not have him to right, then should be given them by the “ King’s Justice a Bpace of at least thirty days and one; and if they could “ find him, they might bring him to justice. But, for himself, let him out “ of his own restore the damage that he had done; or, if the offence be so “ grave, let justice be done upon his body. But, if within the aforesaid “ term he could not be found, since in every Frifiborh there was one head- Feith- “ man whom they called ‘ Fritiborgheved,’ then this headman should take bobh. “ two of the best men of his FriSborh, and the headman of each of the “ three I’riSborhs most nearly neighbouring to his own, and likewise two of “ the best in each, if he can have them ; and so, with the eleven others, he “ shall, if he can, clear both himself and his Fri'Sborh, both of the offence “ and flight of the aforesaid malefactor; which if he cannot do, he shall “ restore the damage done out of the property of the doer, so long as this “ shall last, and out of his own, and that of his Fri'Sborh ; and they shall “ make amends to the Justice, according as it shall be by law adjudged “ them. And, moreover, the oath which they could not complete with the “ venue, the nine themselves shall make, viz. that they had no part in the “ offence. And if at any time they can recover him, they shall bring him “to the Justice, if they can, or tell the Justice where he is.” (Kemble's ‘ Saxons in England,’ vol. i. pp. 249-251.) For the satisfaction of the learned, I here give this chapter of Edward the Confessor’s Laws, in the original Latin:— “ De Frithboegis, et quod soli Eboracenses tocant Frithborch, “ Tenmenne Tale ; i. e. Sermo Decem Hominum.” “ xx. Alia pax maxima est, per quam omnes firmiori statu sustentantur; “ scilicet, fidejussiouis stabilitate, quam Angli vocant Fri'Sborgas, preter “ Eboracenses, qui vocant earn tenmanne tale, hoc est, numerum x homi- 1,1 An early confusion gave rise to the reading of ‘Freoborh’ liberum plegium, free “ pledge, frankpledge, for ‘ Fri'Sborh,’ the pledge or guarantee of peace, pads p/egium. “ This distinction is essential to the comprehension of this institution.” 3 “This is here given only as the most detailed account ; the principle was as old as “ the Anglo-Saxon monarchy itself, or older.” 11* APPENDIX. Fkioboro. “ nurn. Et hoc esfc, quod de omnibus villis tocius regni sub decennnli fide- “juspione debeant omnes esse, ita quod, si unus ex decern forisfecerifc “ novem haberent eum ad rectum. Quod si aufugeret, et dicerent quod “ non possent eum habere ad rectum, daretur eis ad minus, a justicia regis “ spacium xxx dierum et unius diei. Et, si possent eum invenire, adduee- “ rent eum ad justiciam. Ipse quidem de suo restauret dnmpnum quod “ tecerat, et de corpore suo fiat justicia, si ad hoc forisfecerit. Si autem, “ ' n *' ra supradictuin terminum inveniri non poterit, quia in omni FriSborge “ unus erat capitalis quem ipsi vocabant FriSborgheued, ipse capitalis acci- “ P er et duos de melioribus in suo FriSborge, et de tribus Fri'Sborgis pro- “ pinquioribus vicinis suis accipiat de unoquoque capitalem, et, similiter, “ duos de melioribus, si poterit eos habere, et se duodecimo expurget se et “ FriSborgum suum, si facere poterit, de forisfacto et fuga supradicti male- “ fnctoris. Quod si facere non poterit, restauraret dampnutn quod ipse “ fecerat de proprio forisfactoris quantum duraverit, et de suo; et erga jus- “ ticiam emendent, secundum quod legaliter judicatum fuerit eis. Et tamen 1 saeramentum quod non potuerunt coraplere per vicinos, per se ipsos “ novem jurent se esse immunes. Et si aliquem potuerint recuperare, ad- “ ducent eum ad justiciam, si potuerint, aut dicent justicie ubi sit.” (Anglo- Saxon Laws—Leges Regis Edwardi Confessoris, cap. xx.—Thorpe, vol. i. p. 450.) IX. CONSUETUDO—CUSTOM. It will help to illustrate the meaning of the word Consuetudo in this place, if I introduce here a few of Madox’s remarks upon it:— “ The Customs paid to the King was anciently wont to be called in Latin, “ Consuetudo and Custuma. Consuetudo was used in an extensive sense, “ for Payments or Duties of many kinds. For instance, King ‘William I. granted to the Abbey of Westminster eight hides of his Demesne Land “ belonging to the Manor of Piriford, free and quit db omni uiea Consue- “ tudine et Censu pecunice qua Geld vocatur anglice [quit of all manner “ of Custome or Tribute], “ Kbig Stephen remitted to Richard Fitz-William x“,—a duty payable “ out of Richard’s Land [de Consuetudine terra sure], “ In the 9th year of King Henry III., an accompt was rendered to the “ Crown of certain yearly duties, Consuetudines annua, which accrued in “ the Manour of Linlee, and were turned into money. [See Pipe-Roll, 9 “ lien. III., Berks:— De aratura et aliis Consuetudinibus annuis ejusdem “ Manerii conversis in denarios .] “ In an accompt of the Issues of the Bishoprick of Winchester, during “ avoidance, there was answered to the Crown the sum of xvij" vii* viij d “ °b-> arising out of a certain Payment or Duty [de quadam Consuetudine], “ called Kirlcetliet, by sale of three thousand fourscore and seven hens. “ [De iij mills quater xxv ii gallin is pro venien tib us de quadam Consuetudine “ qua vocatur Kirlcetliet per Maneria ejusdem Episcopatus venditis per idem “ fempus. — Mag. Hot. 12 Edw. I. Comp. Episcopat. Winton. rn. 1. a.] “ In fine, Consuetudines signified Regal Dues (Salvo nobis jure et consue- “ tudinibus nostris. — Pat. 5. Joh. m. 2. Ex omni exaclione et Consuetudine “ Kegia. Eorm. Angl. n. Ixiv.), and Episcopal or other Ecclesiastical Dues. “ and Dues or Payments and Exactions of many kinds.” (Hist, of Excheq. p. 525.) We need not cite any of Madox’s observations relating to Prisage of Wines, Disme of Merchandise, and Customs Duties on importation; for these are not in question in the passage before us. At page 3, line 44, we have a specific instance of Custom— Consuetudo — paid to the King, in Briseuuei, viz. 2 Crates and 2 Sticks of Eels, in lieu of an Ineward—and the Inewards themselves, as personal services, or money payments in lieu of them, are Consuetudines due to the King—Regal Dues, out of the enumerated Manors. In the last page of the Domesday of Kent, two instances occur of spe¬ cific Consuetudines, due from the Manor of Milton to the Manor of New¬ ington, viz. a certain number of Weys of Cheese. X. QUIETUS DE THELONIO. Quietus The privilege of freedom from Toll was a franchise enjoyed by the inha- lonTo E " bitants of various towns and manors. In the customal of Pevensey, we have the following entry:— “Item, si ascoygn homme de la franchise de Pevenese veyne ala cite de “ Londrs, ou en qele ville, ffaire, ou marche, ou nostre Seigneur le Roy “ ath p . . . ou seignorie, pour marchandize vendre ou acatre, soit de- 12 * “ streynt pour custume, tohel, pichage, panage, stallage, morage, ou asceyn q 0IETUi “ autre manere poynt en contre lor ffranchise. Deyveut les dits llessevour de The “ et Jures, et soleient mander les lettres a cely qi tiel extorcion lor ath L0NI °- “fait, en priaunt qils facent deliverance a lor combaron ses destre ensi “pris; et si ils ne voillent, soit Wythername (‘) pris du segneur don . . . “ il estoit distre, et de son tenant, de jour en autre, tanqil ath fait delive- “ ranee de la destre ensy pris, ove les amendes.” ( From the Original among the Charters at Surrenden.) “Where the citizens or burgesses of any city or borough have been quit “ of toll throughout the realm by grant of the King’s progenitors, or by “ prescription, then, if such citizens, or any man of such cities or boroughs, “ come with their merchandises unto any fair or market, and there sell “ them, or buy any merchandise, if the King’s officer will demand toll of “ them against the King’s charter, or against the usage or custom, they “ may sue forth this writ, viz.:— “ The King to his bailiff's of A., greeting: Whereas we granted by our “ charter to the burgesses of our town of E. that they, and their heirs and “ successors, burgesses of the same town, should be for ever quit of Toll “ throughout our whole realm and dominion; we command you that you per- “ mit those burgesses to be quit of yielding Toll to you in our said town “ according to the tenor of our charter aforesaid, not molesting or in any wise “ aggrieving them contrary to the tenor thereof. “ If the grant to be quit of Toll be of the grant of the King’s progenitors, “ then the form of the writ is such:— “ The King to the bailiffs of I., greeting: Whereas, amongst other liberties “ granted to the burgesses of our town of G., by the charters of our progenitors “ Kings of England, it is granted to them that they and their heirs for ever “ should be quit of Toll throughout our ivhole realm ’’ etc. etc. “ Tenants of ancient demesne, by the custom of the realm, ought to be “ quit of Toll, etc. in every market, fair, town, or city, throughout the “ realm; and, therefore, every one of them may sue to have letters patent “ under the King’s seal, to all the King’s officers, and to the mayors, “bailiffs, etc.; and the form of the patent is such. [Then follows the “ form.] “ Also, they may have a writ directed to the bailiffs or mayor, or others “ who may compel them to pay Toll, that they suffer them to go quit, etc., I “ and the form of the writ is such.” [Then follows the form.] (Fitzherbert, 1 De Natura Brevium,’ ed. London, 1794, p. 22G to 228.) XI. ORA. Fleta, in his chapter on weights and measures, says :—“ Denarius Anglia; Oba. “qui sterlingus appellatur, et fit rotundns, qui debet ponderare triginta “ duo graua frumenti mediocria, et unde viginti denarii faciunt unciam, et “ duodecim unci® faciunt libram viginti solidorum in pondere et nurnero.” (Fleta, lib. ii. c. 12.) Spelman—sub voce Oba —says :—“ Nummus apud Saxones nostros, qui “ valebat 16 denarios, dute Or© 32 denarios; iE. Miscel. 15 Or® libram “ faciunt juxta alium Codicem, et quandoque poni videtur pro uncia, ut 20 “ denarii in Ora. . . . “ Nota quod Ora significat Uncia; sic enim reperi in antiquo Registro. “ MS. nuper Abb. de Burton in Com. Staff’, expositum. Ex hoc tempore “ unci© valor numerabatur aliquando pro 16d., aliquando pro 20 mesuagium, et iiij acras de Wareland ; et debent per annum xxvij d et ‘ obolum. Et iij gallinas, et dimidium gallum. Et xvj oua. Et arrare di- * midiam uirgam. 2 Et metere j uirgam 2 terre. 1 Sic in the original, “uirg’. 1 ’ 3 In original it is “ u’g’.” 3 In original it is “ u’ge.” 4 In original “oirg”’ anil “uirg." “ Simon Bolle, et Walterus filius 1 Amfelote, et Albretha tenent ij Addington “ mesuagia. Et iij acras et j uirgam 2 terre. Et debent per annum xvij d . ^ I!NT H°ll. ! ‘ Et ij gallinas. Et xiij oua. Et metere dimidiam uirgam 1 terre. Et sextam ‘partem j vomeris, ad festum Sancti Michaelis. Et arrare j daywerbam 3 1 terre. " Rogerus de Corulo tenet j mesuagium, et viij acras et iij uirgas 2 de ‘Wareland. Et debet per annum vj 8 . Et iij gallinas et dimidiam, etj ‘gallum. Et "Willelmus Bruning aliam dimidiam gallinam. Et idem ‘ Rogerus xxvj oua. Et ipse et participes j homiuem ad falcanda prata. Et ‘ metere j acram et ij day werkas et dimidiam. “ Idem Rogerus, et Galfridus atte Wodegate, et Mabilia de Burgo 1 debent xxv d quadrantem, de terra que fuit Eldrich atte Wodegate. Et 'j gallinam. “ Robertus de Aqua tenet duas acras de Wareland. Et debet xvj d , et ‘ j gallinam, et viij oua. “ Orgarus filius Henrici, et Aldred et Galfridus Textor tenent j ‘ mesuagium. Etvj acras de Warland; et debent per annum iiij 8 iij d . Et 1 sextam partem j vomeris, ad festum Sancti Michaelis. Et ij gallinas, etj 1 gallum; et xviij oua. Et arrare sextam partem j uirge 2 terre. Et metere 1 dimidiam uirgam. 1 “ Simon Franceys et Johannes frater eius tenent ij mesuagia, et j ‘ acram et dimidiam de Warland. Et debent per annum xj d . Et j gallinam. ‘ Et yj oua et dimidium. Et terciam partem j vomeris. Et arrare sextam 1 partem j uirge 2 terre. Et metere dimidiam uirgam 2 terre. “ Johannes le Webbe tenet j mesuagium, et j acram de Warland. Et ‘ debet per annum vj d . Etj gallinam. Et iiij oua. Et sparget fena domini. “ Ricardus le Myre tenet ij mesuagia, et vj acras et dimidiam de War- ‘ land. Et debet per annum iiij®—iii d obolum. Et iij gallinas, et terciam ‘ partem j galline. Et j gallum. Et xxij oua. Et arrare ij day werkas et ‘ dimidiam, et quartam partem j dawerke. Et metere v daywerkas et dimi- 1 diain. Et idem et Willelmus Bruning, et participes sui, debent falcare ‘ per j diem. “ Egidius de Monte tenet iij acras et dimidiam de Warland. Et debet ‘ per annum xxj d . Et iiij gallinas. Et xiiij oua. “ Walterus atte Done tenet ij mesuagia, et vj acras, et iij uirgas 4 de 1 Warland. Et debet per annum ij 8 -v d obolum. Et idem, et Walterus, ‘ Johannes et Radulphus, filii Hereberti, debent iij gallinas, et j gallum. ‘ Et idem debet xxvij oua. Et idem et participes sui j hominem per diem ‘ ad prata domini falcanda. “Petrus de Corulo, et Willelmus de la Lyminne, et Walterus de ‘ Corulo, tenent j mesuagium et vij acras de Warland. Et debent per 1 annum iij s -vj d . Et j vomerem ad Natiuitatem Sancti Johannis Baptiste. ‘ Et iij gallinas, et j gallum, et xxviij oua. Et arrare dimidiam uirgam. 2 Et ‘ metere j uirgam. 4 Et j hominem ad fena falcanda per j diem. “Adam de Campo, et Willelmus frater eius, tenent j mesuagium, et v 1 acras de Warland. Et debent per annum ij 8 vj d . Et ij gallinas, et j ‘ gallum, et xx oua. “Thomas Ricard tenet j mesuagium, et v uirgatas 5 de Warland. Et ‘ debet per annum vij d obolum. Et j gallinam in j anno, et dimidiam gal- ‘ linam in alio anno,—et v oua. Et arrare ij daywerkas et dimidiam. Et ‘ metere v daywerkas. “Robertus Burel tenet j mesuagium, et ij acras et dimidiam de War- 1 land. Et debet per annum xv d . Et idem et Randulphus Leaflelle ij ‘ gallinas et j gallum. Et debent xxiiij oua. Et debent arrare dimidiam ‘ uirgam. 4 Et debent metere j uirgam B et j daywerkam et dimidiam. “ Ricardus Lotekyn tenet j mesuagium et iij acras de Warland. Et ‘ debet per annum iij 8 v d . Et j vomerem ad Natiuitatem Sancti Johannis ‘ Baptiste. Et iij gallinas et dimidiam, et j gallum et xviij oua. Et dimi- ‘ dium operis j hominis ad prata spargenda. Et metere dimidiam uirgam. 4 ‘Et arrare dimidiam uirgam. 4 Et dimidium operis j hominis ad prata ‘ falcanda. “ Willelmus filius Turgeys tenet v uirgas 4 de Warland. Et debet per ‘ annum x d . Et j gallinam. Et in tercio anno j gallum et quinque oua. “Radulphus filius Hereberti de la Done et Walterus tenet v ‘ uirgas 4 de Warland. Et debent per annum vj d obolum. Et predicti, ‘ et Eld red filius Henrici, debent j gallinam. “ Idem Eadulphus, Walterus, et Johannes, fratres tenent j mesuagium, et ‘ x acras de Warland. Et debent per annum vj 8 xi d obolum. Et ij gallinas ‘ et ij gallos, et xl oua. Et iij homines ad prata domini colligenda. Et ‘ dimidium hominem ad prata domini falcanda. Et j hominem in secundo ‘ anno ad fena spargenda. Et metere dimidiam acram de gauelrep. 7 “Dauid Leaflell tenet j mesuagium, et ij acras et dimidiam de Wau- 1 land. Et debet per annum xv d . 1 In original it is “ fil,” and therefore may perhaps bo for “ filii.” 2 In original it is “ u’g 1 .” 3 A daywork of land, as stated by Sir Roger Twysden, in his Commonplace Book, was equal to four perches. 4 In original “ oirg’ ” and “ uirg.” fi “IFgat’.” s “TFiga.” 7 Z. e. Reaping Tax, or the customary service of reaping, due to the lord. APPENDIX. Addington “ Waltekus de Burgo tenet j mesuagium et dimidium et v acras et Rent Roll. “ dimidiam de Warland. Et debet per annum xliij d . Et iij gallinas. Et “ in tercio anno j erit gallus, et unum pullum gallinarum ad festum Sancti “ Michaelis et xxij oua, et j horainem ad falcanda prata dornini. Et metere “ ij daywerkas et dimidiam. Et arrare j daywerkam et quartam partem “ j daywerke. Et dimidium vomeris. “ Clemens de Burgo, et partieipes sui, tenent j mesuagium et iiij acras “ de Warland. Et debent per annum xxxij' 1 . Et ij gallinas, et xvj oua. “ Et metere vj daywerkas frumenti vel siliginis. Et arrare v daywerkas. “ Et j hominem ad falcanda prata dornini. “Petrus, Elyas, Robertus, et Radulfhus, beredes Willelmi de “ Burgo, tenent j mesuagium. Et ij acras de “Warland. Et debent per " annum xij d . Et j gallinam, et viij oua. Et ipsi et partieipes eorum inue- “ nient j bominem ad falcanda prata dornini. “ Elyas Pope tenet j mesuagium et dimidium et iiij acras et iij virgas 1 de “ Warland. Et debet per annum xxiij d et iij quadrantes. Et j vomerem “ ad Natiuitatem Sancti Jobannis. Et ij gallinas et ij gallos, et xix oua. “ Et arrare j daywerkam, et quartam partem unius daywerke. Et metere ij “ daywerkas et dimidiam. Et j hominem et dimidium ad fenum colligen- “ dum. Et j hominem et dimidium ad prata falcanda. “ Willelmus Brunig tenet j mesuagium et vij acras de Warland. Et “ debet per annum iij 3 xj d . Et ij gallinas et dimidiam, et j gallum et xxviij “oua. Et arrare j day werlcam. Et metere dimidiam acram. “ Walterus et Robertus, filii Randulphi de Broca, tenent j mesua- “ gium, et viij acras de Warland. Et debent per annum iiij 3 . Et iij “ gallinas et j gallum, et xxxij oua. Et j hominem ad prata falcanda per j “ diem. “ Johanna et Agnes filie Mathei de Hopton tenent j mesuagium et ij “ acras et dimidiam de Warland. Et debent per annum xv d . Et j gallinam “ et dimidium gallum, et x oua. Et arrare ij daywerkas et dimidiam. Et “ metere dimidiam virgam 1 frumenti siue siliginis. Et predicte, et Lucas “ et Euerardus, et Clemens Pirich j bominem ad falcanda prata per j “ diem. “Walterus Denger tenet j mesuagium, et iij acras et dimidiam de “Warland. Et debet per annum ij 3 obolum. Et ij gallinas et j gallum, et “ xiiij oua. Et arrare quartam partem j virge.® Et metere dimidiam uirgam. 1 “ Et idem et partieipes sui de terra Wariner j hominem ad prata falcanda “ per j diem. “ Matilda Denger tenet dimidium mesuagium et j acram et dimidiam de “ Warland. Et debet per annum ix d . Et j gallinam, et vj oua. Et dimi- “ dium hominem ad prata falcanda per diem. Et dimidium vomerem ad “festum Sancti Michaelis. “Galfridus de Broc, et Petrus de la Bercii, et Hugo filius “ Cristine, tenent ij mesuagia, et vij acras de Warland. Et debent per “ annum iij 3 iiij d . Et ij gallinas, et viij oua. “Idem Galfridus tenet j acram et dimidiam de Warland. Et debet “ per annum xiiij d . Et j gallinam et vj oua. Et dimidium hominem ad “ fena dornini spargenda. “Thomas Strephing et Juliana de la Berch, et partieipes sui, tenent j “mesuagium, et v acras et dimidiam de Warland. Et debent per annum “ xxxj d , et iij gallinas et j gallum. “Eadem Juliana tenet iij uirgas 1 terre de Warland. Et debet per “ annum iiij d obolum, et iij oua. Et metet j daywerkam et dimidiam. “ Hugo filius Cristine tenet j mesuagium, et j perticatam de Warland. “ Et debet per annum iij obolos. “Rogerus Brun etRADULPHUs, cum particibus, tenent j mesuagium, et “ iij acras de Warland. Et debent per annum xxv d obolum. Et j galli- “ nam, et j gallum, et xij oua. “ Rogerus Grant, et Simon, fratres, tenent j mesuagium, et ij acras de “ Warland. Et debent per annum xij d . Et j gallinam, et viij oua. Et “metent dimidiam acram. Et predicti, et partieipes sui, inuenient j “ hominem ad prata falcanda. “Johannes et Ricardus, filii Ysabelle, tenent j acram et dimidiam de “ Warland. Et debent per annum v a , et j gallinam. “ Nicholaus de Walda, XX s . “ M d quod dominus tenet j acram de Warland, que vocatur Iselyland, “ et debet per annum iiij d , et sunt in defectu. 3 “ Heredes Chantrel tenent j mesuagium apud Rapham. Et debent per “ annum vj d . Et sunt in defectu. “ Dominus Robertus de Creuquer tenet j acram et dimidium prati. Et “ debet per annum j d quadrantem. Et sectam Curie. Et est in defaltu. “ Redditus in vomer^bus. “Petrus de Corulo, et partieipes sui, j vomerem, ad Natiuitatem “ Johannis. “Walterus de Burgo et Matilda Denger j vomerem ad festum Sancti “ Michaelis. 1 “ Yirg’.” 5 Sic in extenso, “virge.” 3 Probably this, a piece of barland, which the Lord had taken into his own hands, on default or escheat of his tenant. (See Note 4.) “ Elyas Pope, j vomerem, ad Natiuitatem beati Johannis Baptiste. Addington “ Ricardus Lotekyn, j vomerem, ad Natiuitatem beati Johannis Baptiste. P° LL - “ Radulphus Campiun, et partieipes sui, j vomerem ad festum Sancti Michaelis. “ Willelmus de Reyerssf . 4 j vomerem, ad natiuitatem beati Johannis Baptiste. “ Heredes Radulfi Godwyne j vomerem, ad festum Sancti Michaelis. “ Orgarus, et partieipes sui j vomerem ad festum Sancti Michaelis. “ Surnma vomerum, viij. De quibus, iiij ad festum Sancti Michaelis. Et iiij ad Natiuitatem Sancti Johannis Baptiste. lib s d. “ Summa tocius redditus, in denariis, vj ix xi. “ Summa ouorum delxxvj oua et dimidium. “ Summa gallinarum iiij iiij galline et diraidia et xxv galli.” [Then in a somewhat later hand]— “ Summa metendi,vj acras et dimidiam iiij deywercas et quartam partem j deywerce.” [Then in a hand t. Ed. III.]— “ Summa arurarum per annum, i acram dimidiam. “ M d . Q.uod tenentes debent inuenire viij homines et viij curtanas fimam “ dornini extrahendam, et dominus inueniet ij plaustra vel iiij curtanas. “ Et debent domino Iij homines ad ij precarias messionum, et Iij homines “ ad prata.] “ Liberi tenentes soluentes scutagium ad xl de acra j quadrantem. “ Rogerus atte Hesele tenet ij acras. “ Walterus Godwyne, dimidiam acram. “ Johanna de Burgo et Bartholomeus atte Broke ij acras. “ Johannes de Burgo et G. Alyndon i uirgam. 8 “ Johannes le Webbe i acram. “ Summa acrarum, v acre iij uirge.” 6 I will just remark, in passing, that the lands in this Manor are very poor, little more than mere sandstones and sandbanks, almost worthless for cultivation. In my own memory a very large portion of it lay unculti¬ vated in Goss and Broomland rabbit warren, which might have remained in that state till this day but for the requirements of the present owner in creating a park round his mansion, for which purpose he has enclosed a large number of acres, planting some, and converting the rest into grass¬ land, an observation fully borne out by the returns of the jury in the next ensuing inquisition, viz.:— That taken by the Escheator, on the death of Roger de Coleynagne, 8 December, 35 Ed. III., a.d. 1361.—The jury in their return:— “ Dicunt, quod predictus Rogerus tenuit in dominico suo, ut de feodo, “ die quo obiit, Manerium de Adyngton, cum pertinenciis, in eodem Comi- “tatu Kancie, de herede Rogeri de Mortuo Mari, nuper Comitis “ Marchie, defuncti infra etatem, et in Gustodia Regis existente, ut de “ Manerio de Swannescompe, per seruicium tercie partis unius feodi “ militis, et per seruicium reddendi ad predictum Manerium xxxvj 3 per “ annum ; scilicet, ad festum Sancti Andree, et faciendi duos aduentus, ad “ festa Pasche et Sancti Michaelis. “ Et dicunt, quod est ibi unum Capitale Mesuagium, quod nil ualet per “ annum ultra reprisas. “ Et est ibi unum Columbarium, et ualet per annum iij 3 iiij d in seisina, “ et non plus, quia non est bene stauratum. “ Et sunt ibidem lx acre terre arabilis, de quibus due partes inde pos- “ sunt seminari per annum, si bene coluntur ; et tunc ualet acra inde “ per annum iiij d , ultra reprisas; et quando non seminantur, tunc ualet “ acra inde per annum ij d , ut in pastura et bestiis pasturandis. Et pre- “ diete due partes seminabantur ante mortem predicti Rogeri ; et tercia “ pars de predictis lx acris terre, uidelicet xx acre, iacet in warecto; set “ tamen ualet acra inde j d , ut in pastura pro bidentibus, et non plus, quia “ est terra sicca et sabulosa; set jam seminantur inde xij acre terre cum “ semine yemali, et ualet acra inde ultra reprisas iiij d . “ Et sunt ibi vj acre prati, que ualent per annum vj 3 , precium acre xij d , “ tempore falcacionis, et alio tempore anni, ualet acra inde per annum iij d , “ ut in pastura, et faleabantur ante mortem predicti Rogeri, ut dicunt “ super sacramentum suum. “ Et sunt ibi xxiiij acre pasture in bruera in scobis, que ualent per “ annum ij 3 , precium acre i d , et non plus, quia est sicca et sterilis, ut patet “ per uisum. “ Et sunt ibi vj xx acre pasture separalis, que ualent per annum x 3 , pre- “ cium acre j d , ut iu pastura pro bidentibus, et non plus, quia predicta “ pastura est sicca et petrosa, et iacet in montanis, ut dicunt super sacra- “ inentum suum. “Et est ibi unum molendinuin aquaticum, quod ualet per annum “ xiij 3 iiij d , et non plus, quia est totum dirrutum et ruinosum, et non “ potest bene molare per defectum lapidum. 4 There is interlined here, “ Et Robertus Godewyn cst debitor de terra Yslyn.” 6 “U'ga.” « « U’g,” and this entry proves to conviction, that the “ virga ” or “ virgata of the roll is a rood, for the sum of the acreage of the free tenants is 5$ acres. 23* APPENDIX. Addington “ Et es *' >bi de redditibus assisis liberorum teuencium 1 per annum 1 Rent Bolt.. “ lx 8 viij* 1 , soluendis ad iiij or anni terminos principales equis porcionibus. “Et dicunt, quod perquisifca Curiarum ibidem ualet per annum xviij 8 “ iuxta uerum ualorem eusdem.” (See Esc. 35 Ed. III. No. 52.) The next Roll which I adduce of this Manor is one of a century later than the preceding. It is a record of the First Court held by the Lord of the Manor, Edmund Watton, on the 17th December, 12th Ed. IV., a.d. 1472, as follows:— “ Adyngton. —Prima Curia Edmundi Watton tenta ibidem die Jovis proxima post festum Sancte Lucie Virginia, auno regui Regis “ Edwardi quarti post eonquestum, duodecimo. “ Essonia. —Nulla ad hunc diem. >j d “Defulta. —Tenentes ibidem presentant, quod Efisoofds Ruffensis, ij 4 ij d “ Georgius Browne, miles, Jodannes Clerk, unus Baronum, I >j 'j d “Scaccarii domini Regis, Ricardus Eggyock, Johannes Irere, ,ij d >j d >j d . “ Ricardus Borgh, Johannes Osbarne, Johannes Cotton, Wil- ijd _ ij d ij 4 “ lelmus Stevynson, senior, Johannes Hokeby, Willelmus Cul- ij 4 “ peper, Willelmus Loperham, faeiunt defaltum—Ideo “ in miserieordia. “ Finis.—Johannes Hassell dat domino pro fine pro seeta Curie relax- “ anda de hoc anno iiij a . “ Distrahere. —Et preceptum est distrahere Thomam Pykenham, pro j “ secta Curie et Releuio domino faciendis. “ Alienaoio. —Item presentant, quod Johannes Frere, Senior, de “Adyngton, alienauit Jouxnni William, Johanni Serch, et “ Johanni Clerk, unam peciam terre vocatam Mille Lone, “ continentem per estimacionem iij acras et dimidiam terre, et “ reddentem per annum vij d . Ideo, preceptum est distrahere “dictum Johannem William, pro secta Curie, Releuio, et “fidelitate domino faciendis, erga proximam Curiam. “Alienacio. —Et quod Ricardos Borgh alienauit unam peciam terre “vocatam Bealde, Johanni William, Johanni Serch, et “ Johanni Clerk. Ideo, preceptum est distrahere eos erga “ proximam Curiam pro secta Curie, Releuio et fidelitate “ domino faciendis. “ Alienacio. —Et quod predictus Johannes Frere, Senior, alienauit unam “ peciam terre vocatam Litilstone, prefatis Johanni William, “ Johanni Serch, et Johanni Clerk. Ideo, preceptum est “ distrahere eos erga proximam Curiam, pro secta Curie, Re- “ leuio, et fidelitate domino faciendis. Alienacio. —Et quod Johannes Hasill alienauit prefatis Johanni “ William, Johanni Serch, et Johanni Cleric, unum mesua- “ gium, cum certis terris adiacentibus, quondam Thome Hasill “ atte Wodgate. Ideo, preceptum est distrahere eos erga “ proximam Curiam, pro secta Curie, Releuio, et fidelitate “ domino faciendis. “Alienacio. —Et quod Johannes William, alienauit unum mesuagium in “ quo inhabitat, iacens in.cum certa terra eidem mesua- “gio pertinente Johanni Carpynteu, Johanni Serch, Jo- “ hanni .Deysye. Ideo, preceptum est distrahere eos, “ erga proximam Curiam, pro secta Curie, Releuio, et fidelitate “ domino faciendis. “Alienacio. —Et quod Ricardus Paktrych, perquisiuit de Johanne “ Elyott, unam peciam terre in Northfelde, continentem “ per estimacionem j acram et dimidiam terre. Ideo, precep- “ turn est distrahere predictum Ricardum pro secta Curie, “ Releuio, et fidelitate domino faciendis. “ Alienacio. —Et quod Johannes Cherch, perquisiuit de Thoma Frere, “unum mesuagium cum crofto adiacente, quondam vocatuin “ Bokeherst. Ideo, preceptum est, distrahere predictum Jo- “hannem, pro secta Curie, Releuio, et fidelitate domino “ faciendis. “Alienacio. —Et quod Willelmus Lopham perquisiuit de Johanne “ Clerk, uno Baronum Scaccarii domini Regis, eertam terrain “ et boscum jacentes atte Compe, quondam Galones et Johan- “ Nis Hexstaple. Ideo, preceptum est distrahere eum, erga “ proximam, etc., pro secta Curie, Releuio, et fidelitate domino “ faciendis. 1 The services of the “ villani,” then, must now have been commuted to money pay¬ ments, and themselves become “ Liberi Tenentes ” by payment of assised or fixed rents, which rents consisted partly of money, and partly of eggs, hens, a specified number of men to sow, reap, etc. It is true they are not distinctly enumerated in the inquisition, nor are they in later ones, but they nre regularly set out in the Court Rolls down to the end of the seventeenth century, of which I have a large number, and it is important to notico the continuance of these services even down to modern times; they are regularly detailed in all the Rolls. 24* “Alienacio.—E t quod Johannes Delton, perquisiuit de Johanne Wil- Addington “ liam, unum mesuagium, cum certis terris adiacentibus, quou- ® Ef,T Eoi.l “ dam Thome Hasill, atte Wodegate, nunc Johannis Hasill. “ Ideo, preceptum est distrahere predictum Johannem Delton, “ pro secta Curie, Releuio, et fidelitate domino faciendis.” Then follows the record of another Court held at the ensuing Epiphany, but it developes no new feature, and its insertion will not furnish any in¬ formation requisite to be inserted here. The above is sufficient to evidence the complete change that had taken place in the Manor as to the nature of the tenure. There is now not a single “ Villanus ” bolding as that class seems to have held at the time of the Survey. All are now “ Liberi Te¬ nentes,” and alienations in freehold seem to have been made them in that capacity for many years past. They still, however, hold of the Lord by assised rents, and services of Suit of Court, Heriot, Relief, etc.; and as it appears throughout this series of Rolls, by providing the service of labour at fixed periods, the Bederips or Precari®, and certain rents in eggs and poultry, as the “ Villani ” used to do of old. The next document to introduce is a roll containing a list of the services due from the tenants of the Manor to the Lord. I found it in the collec¬ tion of Mr. Dudlow described above. It has no date, but, judging from the handwriting, I would assign it to the middle of the sixteenth Century. It is as follows:— Servyces due to the Manour of Adyngton. “ In primis, off Mr. Clarke, viij men to every worke. “ Item, off Patche, for old John Godyn, one man. “ Item, off Gamox, ij men. “ Item off Sage, for Buschopp, j man. “ Item, off Bartholomews Smyth, one halfe man. “ Item, off Vydnan, ij men et dimidius. “ Item, off Buysenden, for Mr. Sydley, j man. “Item, off Tong Gamble, for Mr. Sydley, ij men. “ Item, off Alyxaundek Fulcicam, for Palleyz heirs, j man. “ Item, off Wymble, for old John Goden, ij men. “Item, off John Dan, and old Gamble, for the lands sumtyme Wel- “ beck’s, iiij men. “ Item, off Richahd Clarice, for Pyckener’s tenement, dimidius man. “ Item, of hym, for the tenement that Homewodde dwellyth in, j man. “ Item, of hym, for the iandds callyd Heme’s landds, j man. “ Item, off hym, for Pyrchotts. “ Item, off Nycholas Howell, for Bensanz tenement, i man. “ Item, off old John Godyn, for the Brokeffelds, j man. “ Item, off hym for the tenement that Eye dweyllyth in, hytt was parcell “ of the Upperhowse lands, whyche Thomas Godyn holdyth, whiche “ Thomas is alowyd for hytt the payment of hys seruyees. “Item, off hym for Pyckenur’s tenement, sumtyme one John Hasell, “ij men. “ Item, off Wyllard, for old John Godyn, j man. “ Item, off Thomas Godyn, for the Hpperitowse lands, j man. “ Item, off hym, for the tenement att East streete, and the landd “thereunto belougyDg, sumtyme one John Amphell, j man. “ Item, off Margerye Walsyngham, ij men. “Item, off Syr Mathewe Browne, for Underwoddes Bromes, j man. “ Item, of Rychard Clarke, for the Pyiiohotts. “ Item of George Clarke, and of hys mother, for Tomlyns and Lover “ and other landds. “Item, of Nyciiolas Howell, for the tenement that he dwellyth in, “ and the lands thereunto belongyng. “Item, of my Lorde of Burgeyvennie, for Carpenters lande, nowe in the Parke, and Lawnder’s Mede, lyyng to the pale. “ Item, of Thomas Godyn, for Edward’s feld, Monefeld, Byrchotte, “ and the ij Midll Croftez. “ Item, tor the landd callyd Goftes Land, in the occupyeing of Mr. “ George Clarke. “ Item, of old John Godyn, for Womanffeld, Erakalands, Burgh “ mede, the Lyttyl mede, and other lands. “ All theyse paye no servyces, for that they have agreeyyd with the L, “ Mr. Watton, to paye for theyr landd, after iiij 8 the acree by the yere, as “ long as hytt shall please hym,” etc. We will now pass on to the Court Roll of a Century later, viz. a.d. 1657. It begins with “ A view of Frank Plege with Court Baron,” at which the appointment of officers, and the presentments of different nuisances and offences are made. It is beside our purpose to transcribe these here, although I cannot avoid noticing the heading of the Inquisition, as a most extraordinary one for the year 1657. It is thus :— “ The Inquisition for the King’s Majestie.” Pass we on then to that which more concerns us in our present investi¬ gation, “ The Surveyit is as follows:— APPENDIX. Addington Rent Roll. “Addington. —The Court Baron of William: Watton, Esq., of his “ Mannor of Addington aforesaid, holden there the viij th daie “ of October, Anno Domini, 1657. “Essoynes. —The heires of S r William Clarke, essoyned by Thomas “ Young. George Lux ford, essoyned by Thomas Haryy. “Thomas Godden, essoyned by Thomas Young. William “ Btng, essoyned by Richard Hastelyn. “Homage f Thomas Young, ~\ John Gosling, i- Jurati. Edward Croewrst.J “ Which said Homage being sworne and charged upon theire oathes, pre- “ sent, that the late Busiiop of Rochester, John, Baron of Aberge- “venny, Christofer Morland, Gent., Augustine Morland, Gent., “ Nevell Savage, Gent., the heires of Lambard Kitchill, Thomas “Brigden, Thomas Stacy, the heires of George Elfick, Martha “Vavaser, widow, John Neaue, and George Savage, are tenants of “ this Mannor, and do owe theire suite and service at the Court holden “ heere this daie, and have made default. Wherfor, they have forfeited “ unto the Lord of the said Mannor, every of them, severallie, ij' 1 . “ A Survey of all and singular the lands and tenements within “the Mannor of Addington aforesaid, with the rents, “ customes, and services due, and of right belonging to the “ Lord of the Mannor aforesaid, for the same. And also, “ the severall tenants which clayme to hold of the said “ Mannor. Taken and presented by the Homage aforesaid, “ at this Court, as followe:— “Busiiop “Inprimis, they present, that the late Bushop of Rochester “ holdeth of the Lord of this Mannor as of his Mannor of “Addington aforesaid, by fealtie,—suite unto his Court of “ the Mannor aforesaid from three weeks to three weeks, “ harriott, and relief, when it shall happen, and by the yeerlie “ rent heer under written, one parcell of meadow land, lying “ neere Frowdforth bridge, alias Erow'dbridge, conteyning “ by estimacion one acre and an half. The rent wherof by the “ yeere is ii d ob. "Lord -.“Item, they present that John, Baron of Abergevenny, Abebga- I “holdeth of the Lord of this Mannor, by fealtie,'—suite unto venney, hisj «jjj a Courte, etc., Harriott and Releif, when it shall happen, Tenure. ,< |jy fcjj 0 yearlie rent of certeine lands, called Carpen- “ ter’s Land, lying within the late parke, called Birling Parke, “ and part of a parcell of meadowe land, called Lawnder’s “ Meade, lying on the west side of the said [sic]. He holdeth “ also one other parcell of land, called Mantles, conteyning “ by estimacion three acres, for all which lands no rent is paid, “ bycause the Lord of this Mannor holdeth certeine lands of “ the said Baron of Abergevenny, as of his Mannor of “ Ryarsh, for which the Lord of this Mannor paieth no rent. ■ “ S r Wit 1 “ Item, they present that the heires of S r William Clarke, T .nw [ “ knight, bold of the Lord of this Mannor, by fealtie, suite Claeke, [“unto his Court, etc., Harriott, and Releif, when it shall IS enure. «) ia pp en> certaine lands which were his antecessors, for which “ the yeerlie rent is xyj s iiij d ; fora plough-share, ij s viij d ; and “ for the service and labour of viij men yeerlie at all workes, “ v 3 iiij d ; for viij hens, ij 3 ; for iiij cocks, viij 3 ; and for Ixxxxix “ eggs, x 3 . The said ij 3 viij d for the henns and cocks ought to “ be paid at Christmas, yeerlie, and the said x 3 for eggs to be “ paid at the feast of Easter yearlie. They hold also one tene- “ ment, and certeine lands purchased by W illiam Clarke, “Esq., grandfather of the said Sir WIlliam Clarke, of James “ Godden, of Cuckstone, and late in the tenure of Robert « Ellis, by fealtie, suite unto his Court, etc., Harriott and “ Releif, when it shall happen, and by the yearlie rent of ij 3 vj d ; “ and for a plough-share, iiij d ob.; and for suite unto his Court “ for the last mencioned lands, yeerlie iiij 3 ; and by the service “ of one man, for one daie yeerlie, at every worke, and ij henns, “ and xiiij eggs. “Thomas - “ Item, they present, that Thomas Brigden holdeth of the Brigden’s l “ Lord of this Mannor, by fealtie, sute unto his Court, etc. Tenure. J « Harriott and Releif, when it shall happen, vij pieces of laud “ and wood, called Tomlyns, conteyning by estimacion xxxij “ acres late the lands of Samuell Cooke, Clerke, deceased “ and purchased by him of Sir John Howell, Knight. For “ these lands the yeerlie rent is xij d . “Lambert “Item, they present, that the heires of Lambard Kitchill Kitcuill’s L« hold of the Lord of the Mannor, one Messuage, and certeine Tenure. J «] anc [ S) w Mch w-ere the lands of Thomas Kitchill, grand- “ father of the said Lambert, by fealtie, suite unto his Courte, “ etc., Harriott and Releif, when it shall happen, and by the “yeerlie rent of iiij 3 vj d ; and for a plough-share viij 3 , iij hens, “ and xxiiij eggs; and by the service of ij men for one daie “ TnoMAS Kitcii ill’s T enure. “ William Tenure. “George Elfick's Tenure. “ Thomas Godden, liis Tenure. “ yeerlie, at two bedrips, one of wheate and the other of rye, Addington “belonging to the Lord of the said Manner; and by the Kent Koli - “ service of ij men, for one daie yeerlie, to turne, gather together, “ and cock the hay belonging to the Lord aforesaid; and by the “ service of ij men, for one daie yeerlie, to scowre the water- “ course belonging to his mill; and by the service of ij men, ‘one daie yeerlie, to carry out and spread the dung of the said “ Lord, which shall yeerlie arise and be made upon his demeasne “ lands. “Item, they present, that Thomas Kitchill, unkle unto the “ said Lamberd, claymeth to hold of the Lord of this Manner “a cottage, with the garden and backside thereunto belonging' “ and also tenn acres of land, by estimacion, called “ which said cottage and lands were part of the lands of Thomas “Kitchill, grandfather unto the said Lamberd, and were “purchased of the said Lamberd by the said Thomas Kit- “ chill, his unkle, and hold by fealtie, suite of Court, Harriott, “ and Releif, when it shall happen, and by the yeerlie rent of “ iij 3 iiij d , iiij hens, and xxiiij eggs, for which alienacion there “ happeneth unto the Lord of the said Mannor, for a Releif, “ iij s iiij d , which Releif is not paid. Therfore it is ordered, “ that a distresse be taken for the same, and that the said “ Thomas shall appears at the next Courte to be holden for “ this Manner, to do his fealtie, and paie the Releif, upon paine “ to forfeit unto the Lord of the said Manner x d . “Item, they present, that William Byng, gentleman,holdeth “of the Lord of this Manner, by Fealtie, suite unto his Court, “ Harriott and Relief, when it shall happen one messuage and “ xxx acres of land and one parcell of woodland, conteyning “ by estimacion one acre. And by the yeerely rent of iiij 3 xj d , “ ij hens and xxv eggs, and by the service of ij men and an “ half for one daie yeerlie at every of the workes above men- “ eioned, which messuages and lands were sometyme the lands “ of George Scott. “ Item, they present, that Christofer Morland, gentleman, “and Augustine Morland, gentleman, Lord of the Manner, “one messuage, situate at Woodgate within the Manner afore- “ said, and certeine lands thereunto belonging, late the lands of “Anthony Attwood, deceased, and formerlie the lauds of “ James Attwood, gentleman, by Fealtie, suite unto his Court, “etc., Harriott and Releif when it shall happen, and by the “ yeerlie rent of vj 3 , For sharesilver iiij d , For the service of iiiij “ men at the several workes aforesaid ij 3 viij d , and iiij hens and “ xliiij eggs. Also, they hold certeine woodland purchased of “ James Willard by the yearlie rent of ij d , and one other “ parcell of land, lying neere Gallows Leaze, late purchased “ of Edmund Clarke, gentleman, by the yeerlie rent of viij d . “Item, they present, that George Elfick holdeth of the “ Lord of this Manner one Messuage, called The Fell, and “ xx acres of land, with the appurtenances, late the lands of “ Anthony Godden, andformerlieof William BooREMAN,pur- “ chased by the said George of William Faireman, by Fealtie, “ suite unto his Courte, Harriott and Releif when it shall “ happen, and by the yeerlie rent of ij 3 iiij d , for share silver j d , “ one hen, and xij eggs, and by the service of ij men for one “ daie yeerlie at all the severall workes aforesaid. Also, he “ holdeth one Messuage and certeine lauds thereunto belong- “ing, conteyning by estimacion vj acres, late purchased of “Anthony Godden, and formerlie the lands of William “ Booreman, by the yeerlie rent of iiij 3 , For share silver viij, “ iij henns, and xxiiij eggs, and by the service of j man for one “ daie yeerlie at everie severall worke aforesaid. Also, two “ parcels of land, called Brookefeilds, conteyning v acres, “purchased of the heires of James Faireman, by the yeerlie “ rent of ij 3 , and the service of j man for one daie yeerlie at “ the severall workes aforesaid, j hen, and x eggs. “Item, they present, that Thomas Godden, gentleman, “ holdeth of the Lord of this Manner, by Fealtie, Suite unto “ his Court, etc., Harriott and Releif, when it shall happen, “divers lands and tenements hereafter named. That is to “ saie,—One Messuage or Tenement, called Woodgate, within “ the Manner aforesaid, and one parcell of Meadow to the “same adioyning, and by the yeerlie rent of xij d , for Share “ silver ij d , iij hens, and xxij eggs. And certeine lauds which “late were the lands of John Godden and his unkle, and by “ the yeerlie rent of iij 3 , j hen, and xij eggs. And by the ser- « vice of ij men.at the severall workes aforesaid. Also “ certeine lands called IIorsleaze and IIorsleaze Meade, “ late the lands of George Godden, by the yeerlie rent of ij 3 , “ for Share silver ij d , and the service of one man for one daie 25* APPENDIX. Addington Kent Roll. “ Martha Vauaser’s Tenure, bought of Stbbven Godden. “Augus- "1 tineMor- ! land, liis | Tenm-e. J Young's > Tenure. J “ Laurence- Fisher’s Tenure. “ George -i Savage, > liis Tenure. J “ Nevh.l Savage’s i Tenure. } Tenure. ■».} “yeerlio at every of the severall workes aforesaid, all which “the premises were, t.yme out of mind, the lands of John “ Godden, of Woodgate aforesaid. Also one Messuage or “ Tenement, and three parcels of land, late purchased of Wil- “ liasi Clarke, of Ford, Esq., called Pottit’s Croft and “ Pottit’s Tenement, by the yeerlie rent of sx' 1 . Also, certeine “ lauds called Spirchetts, couteyning, by estimacion, xxx acres, “ purchased of Edmond Clarke, Gentleman, by the yeerlie rent “ of x s . Also, one parcell of land called Brookefeild, pur- “ chased of John Clarke, Gentleman, by the yeerlie rent of “ ij s viiij d . “ Item, they present, that Martha Vayaser holdeth of the “ Lord of this Manner certeine lands called Hasells, by . “ Fealtie, Suite unto his Court, etc., Harriott, and Releif “ when it shall happen, and by the yeerlie rent of ij 8 iiij d , and “x eggs. Also, one Messuage and certeine lands at East- “ streete, by the yeerlie ren tof ij 3 vj a , For Share silver ij 11 , and “ the service of ij men for one daie yeerlie at all the severall “ workes aforesaid, and iij hens, and xv eggs. Also certeine “ lands called Pettams, late the lands of James "Willard, by “ the yeerlie rent of iij 8 , and one parcell of Meadowe, called “ Borrowe Meade, by the yeerlie rent of v d . And lastlie, one “ Mesuage or Tenement, formerlie in the tenure of Ralfe May, “ by the yeerlie rent of ij d ob., and the service of one man for “ one day yeerlie at everie of the severall workes aforesaid. “Item, they present, that Augustine Morland, Gentleman, “ holdeth of the Lord of this Manner certeine lands called “ Upperhouse Land, by Fealtie, Suite unto his Courte, etc., “ Harriott, and Releif, when it shall be due, and by the yeerlie “ rent of ij a vij d , for a Share iiij d . And one Messuage, situate “at Eaststreete, by the yearlie rent of iij d , iij hens, and “ xv eggs, and the service of ij men yeerelie at every of the “ severall workes aforesaid. “ Item, they present, that Thomas Young holdeth of the “ Lord of this Manner certeine woodland, called Gallows “ Leaze, by Fealtie, Suit of Courte, etc., Harriott, and Releif, “ when it shall happen, and by the yeerlie rent of iij 3 , for a “ Share iiij", ij hens and one cock, and xviij eggs, and by the “ service of j man, for one daie yeerlie, at everie of the severall “ workes aforesaid. Allso, one Messuage, wheriu Doe formerly “ inhabited, and certeine lands thereunto belonging, by the “ yeerlie rent of ij* iij 4 , j hen, and xiiij eggs, and the service “ of one man for one daie yeerlie at everie of the severall “ workes aforesaid, find likewise one little Meadow lying neere “Frowdeu’s Bridge, by Fealtie, Suite unto his Court, etc., “ and by the yeerlie rent of iiij' 1 . “ Item, they present, that Laurence Fischer holdeth of the “ Lord of this Manner one Messuage, scituate in Eaststreete, “ and v parcells of land and wood, conteyning, by estimacion, “ xviij acres, called by the severall names of Moonefield, “ Edwardsfeild, and Birchetts, by Fealtie, Suite unto his “ Court, Harriott, and Releif, when it shall happen, and by the “yeerlie rent of v s , j hen, and x eggs, and by the service of one “ man yeerlie for one daie, at every severall worke. “ Item, they present, that George Savage holdeth of the “ Lord of this Manner one parcell of land, called TJnder- “ wood’s Broome, and one little Croft, conteyning, by estima- “ cion, one acre, by Fealtie, Suite unto his Courte, etc., Har- “ riott, and Releif, when it shall happen, aud by the yeerlie “ rent of ij s viij d , j hen, and x eggs, and by the service of one “ man, for one daie, yeerlie, at euery of the said works. “Item, they present, that Nevell Savage, sonne of the “ said George, holdeth of the Lord of this Maimer five acres “ of land, with the appurtenances, called Horslees, late pur¬ chased by the above said George Savage of Isabell Sher- “ wood, sister and next heire of John Cost, the younger, who "was heire of the said John Cost, the elder, deceased, by “ Fealtie, Suite of Court, etc., Harriott, and Releif, when it “ shall happen, and by the yeerlie rent of xxij 3 . “Item, they present, that the above-named Augustine “ Morland holdeth also of the Lord of this Manner one Mes- “suage, with the appurtenances, formerlie the Messuage of “Robert Lynch, by Fealtie, Suite unto his Court, and by the “ yeerlie rent of iij 3 . “Item, they present, that the said Augustine Morland “ holdeth lykewise of the Lord of this Manner one cottage, “formerlie purchased by Robert Lynch, of Collyar, and late “ the cottage of Thomas Cooper, by Fealtie, Suite unto his “ Court, and by the yeerlie rent of j s , which cottage was “ sometyme the cottage of Frauncis Daucke. Item, they present, that John Gosling holdeth of the Addington “ Lord of this Manner one Messuage, one Barne, one Orchard, -^ ENT Roll. “one Gardine, and seaven parcels of land, with th’appurte- “ nances, conteyning, by estimacion, xviij acres, by Fealtie, “Suite unto his Courte, etc., Harriott, and Releif, when it “ shall happen, and by the yeerlie rent of vij 3 . j “Item, they present, that Thomas Stacy claymeth to hold of the Lord of this Manner one parcell of land, called Lynk- “ reeds, conteyning, by estimacion, vij acres, late the lands of “ Baker, alias Heath, by Fealtie, Suite unto his “ Courte, etc., Harriott, and Releif, when it shall happen, and “ by the yeerlie rent of ij a iiij 4 . “Item, they present, that John Neaue holdeth of the Lord ■ “ of this Manner ij cottages, late purchased of Richard Lynch, “by Fealtie, Suite unto his Court, etc., Harriott and Releif, “ when it shall happen, aud by the yeerlie rent of j 3 . “Item, they present, that Edward Crowerst holdeth of ' “ the Lord of this Manner one parcell of woodland, called “Horslees Spring, by Fealtie, Suite unto his Court, etc., “ Harriott, and Releif, when it shall happen, and the yeerlie “ rent of vj 3 . “ Afferred by the Homage above said, “ By mee, Laur. Byng, Steward of the Mannor aforesaid.” The last Roll which I shall adduce is a Survey of the Manor in the year 16S0, at which late period the rent of Eggs and Poultry, and Labour service, as by the “ Villani ” of old, is still claimable from the Freeholders of the Manor. The Survey is as follows:— “Addington.—A Rentall of the said Manor renewed att a Court there “ holden, the 12th day of October, Anno Domini, 1GS0, with “ Tenements held by fealty, suite of Court, Harriott, and Re- “ lief, as well after alienation as after Death. “ The Bishoppe of Rochester, for a Meadow att Frowder’s Bridge, “ per annum ... 2JJ. “ The Lord Abergeuenney, for Carpenters Lands, and a parcell of Land “ called Launder’s Meade, and also for a parcell of Land called “ Mantles, per annum. 1 “John Clerke, Esq., for Lands in Addington, which were his ancestors, “per annum ... £1. 11s. 2 Id., 2 hens and 14 eggs. “Ralph Petley, Esq., for two Messuages att Woodgate, and severall “ lands in Addington, which hee purchased of Thomas Godden, per “ annum ... £1. 2s. Sd., 4 hens and 24 eggs, aud the service of 6 men “ at all workes. “ Robert Topps, Clerke, for a Messuage and lands purchased of Phillippe “ Boddenham, Esq., per annum ... Is. 2 d., 1 man and an half. “ William Bing, Gent., for a Messuage and divers lands in Addington, “per annum ... 6s. id., 3 hens, 34 eggs, and the service of 3 men “ and an half at all workes. “Phcebea Smyth, for a Tenement called Birch Hall, and for a parcell of “land called Westfield, per annum ... 3s. 6 d. “ Lambert Kitchell, for a Messuage and certaine lands in Addington “ 4s. 10d., 3 hens, 24 eggs, and the service of one man. “ The heires of Thomas Kitchell, for a cottage and tenne acres of land in “Addington, per annum ... 2s. 3nf., 2 hens aud 16 eggs, and the “ service of one man for half a day att all workes. “ Thomas I-Iarrison, Gent., for two Messuages and divers lands in Ad- “dington, purchased of Mr. Elficke, per annum ... 9s. Id., 4 hens “ and 36 eggs. “Anthony Chamberlaine, for the Moyety of seaven parcells of land and “ wood called Tomlins, per annum ... 6s., and the service of one man. “Thomas Stone, for the Moyety of the said seaven parcells of land ... 6s., “ and the service of one man. “William Robins, for Lands purchased of Thomas Hooker, the elder, “att severall tymes, per annum ... 2s. 3d. "Thomas Hooker, Junior, for a Messuage at Eaststreete, and certine “ lands thereunto belonging, purchased of Thomas Hooker, his “father ... 6s. id., 3 hens, 25 eggs, and the service of 3 men. “ Robert Dixon, D r in Divinity, for a Messuage and lauds thereto belong¬ ing, per annum ... 5s. 2d., the service of two men, 2 hens, 22 eggs. ' Marke Hubble, for a Messuage and certaine lands att Woodgate, for- “rnerly Valentine Nicholas, per annum ... 4s. 2d., 2 hens, 22 eggs. “Marke Hubble, for a Messuage and seaven parcells of land, formerly “John Goslings, per annum ... 7s. “Thomas Golding, for a parcel of Woodland, purchased of Thomas “ Young, called Gallon Leaze, per annum 3s. id., 3 hens, 1 cock, 18 “ eggs, and the service of one man at all worke. Gosling’. Tenm-e. “ Thomas Stacy’s Tenure. Ne ACE'S Tenure. “Edward his Tenure. APPENDIX. Addington “ Thomas Yoong, for a Messuage, and certain lands thereunto belonging, Kent Hold. “ per annum ... 1 hen, 24 eggs, and the service of one man. “The heires of Laurence Fisher, for a Messuage at Eaststreete, and “ the lands thereunto belonging, per annum ... 5s., 1 hen, 10 eggs, “ and the service of one man. “ Thomas Tresse, for lands lately purchased of Christopher Burston, “ per annum ... 4s. Qd., 1 hen, 10 eggs, and the service of one man. “MARYCARNOLD.for lands which'were John Austin’s called Linkereede’s, “ per annum ... 2s. 4 d. “James Godden, Gentleman, for two Cottages, which were Mr. Edmund “ Attwood’s, and before, John Neame’s, per annum ... 2d. “ The inhabitants of East Streete, for the Common there, 20 egges, viz., “of every of the five Tenements, there, 4 egges, per annum ... 20 “ eggs. “ Roger Tomlyn, Gentleman, in the right of Mary, his wife, for a Messuage “att East Streete, and certaine lands thereunto belonging, per “ annum, 2s. 10 d., for Sharesilver 4 d., 3 hens and 15 egges, and the “ service of two men. “ Also, for a Cottage att Addington Greene, and a little parcell of “ Land thereto belonging, formerly the lands of Cooper and Lynch, i, 1 d. “Also for a Messuage and lands in the occupacion of Henry “ Martyn, per annum, 3 d. “ And for another Cottage att Addington Greene, formerly “Nicholas Whiting’s, per annum, M—3s. Id., 3 hens, 15 eggs, “ and the service of two men. “ The Totall in Money . “ Hennes , G 19 4 thirty and one Cocke. 318.” Charter by Gaufridus Prior et Couventus Ecclesie Christi, Cantuarie, uni- Gaufeidus versis Christi fidelibus, ad quos presens scriptum pervenerit, eternam in bdby ASTBK ' Christo salutem. Sciatis, nos, uuanimi voluntate, concessisse terras de dominiis nostris et eschatis, (') salvis consuetudinibus quas solebant facere, apud Parlege, et Lose, et Peciiam, jure hereditario tenendas, hominibus quorum nomina, cum numero acrarum, et annua pensione, (sic) presenti carte inserta sunt; videlicet:— Geroldo Carpentario, is acras, pro xij d et obolo. Edit la Paumere, j acram pro ij vomeribus. Otuel de Lose, iij acras pro iiij d . Gunnobe de la Dene, xj acras et dimidiam, pro x' 1 2 et ij vomeribus. Ade, dimidiam acram, pro ij d et obolo. Frethesent, dimidiam acram, pro j vomere. Roberto filio Elfegi, j percatam, pro j vomere. Elfstan Le Fullere, j acram, pro vj d . Radulpho Clerico, et Jacobo, Fratri ejus, j deiwerc, pro j d . Siwordo, dimidiam acram, pro iij obolis. Eadwordo Clerico, iij acras, pro ij vomeribus. Radulpho Le Boise, ij acras, pro iij d . Adword Le Beane, j percatam, pro j vomere. Otuel Clerico, j acram de Eschart, ( s ) pro iij obolis, Godefrido Gilde, j acram et dimidiam, pro vij d . Simon de la Helle et Orgar, iiij acras et dimidiam, pro v d , et j qua¬ drante et ij vomeribus. Otuel Clerico, xlviij acras, pro ix solidis, et ix d , et obolo. Juleen de Lose, xvij acras, pro iiij solidis et ij d . Johanni de la Hoke, xvij acras, pro iiij solidis et ij d . Willelmo Forester, iij acras et iij percatas, pro x d . Ade et Julien, iiij acras, pro xv' 1 . Hereberto, ij acras, pro v d . David, ij acras, pro v d . Simun de Wrstede, ij acras, pro v d . Ordelino, et fratribus ejus, v acras et iij percatas, pro xv' 1 . Gileberto, j acram, pro v d . Hamun de Pirefeld, et fratri ejus, iiij acras et j percatam, pro xi d , et j quadraute. Thome, v acras, et j percatam, pro xv d . Thome de Pirefelde, iiij acras, pro x d . 1 “ Escheats ” is used sometimes for the places or circuit, in which the King, or other Lord, hath escheats of his tenants. (Jacob, citing Bracton, lib. iii. tract. 2, cap. 2.) 2 Eschart, i. q; assart. It means “assarted lands,” i. e. wild or forest lands broken up for culture. “ Assartum est quod redactuin est ad Culturam.” (Fleta, lib. iv. cap. 21.) In the Bed Book of the Exchequer we find the following:— “ Assurta, vero, ilieuntur, que apud Isidorum oeeisioncs nuncupautur, quando Eoreste, "nemora, vol Duineta, pnscuis et latibulis fcrarum opportuna, succiduntur; quibus suc- “ cisis et radicitus avulsis, terra subvertitur et excolitur.” Elfwine le Cau, i Simun de la Helle, \ , pro vj“ et j quadrante. Charter by , vj acras et j percatam, pro xv d . ^Canter Willelmo, et Elfego, fratri ejus, iij acras et dimidiam, pro x d . bury. * Hereui, j acram et j percatam, pro iij ' 1 et iij quadrantibus. Ade Worde, ij acras, pro v d . Orgar, ij acras et dimidiam percatam, pro v d . Elredo, ij acras et dimidiam, pro vij d et j obolo. Elueue, Vidue, iiij acras, et iij percatas, pro xij d et obolo. Radulpho de Chelested, iiij acras et iij percatas, pro x d . Dyonisio Filio Gocelini, xxxij acras, pro viij solidis, et iiij d . Marice Stabulario, viij acras, pro xx d . Heredibus Albini, ij acras et dimidiam, pro vj d et j quadrante. Elfwine le Cau, iiij acras, pro x d . Radulpho Filio Ade de Chelested, iiij acras, pro x d . Ade et Julien, ix acras et dimidiam, pro xij d . Willelmo et Deiungo, ij acras et dimidiam, pro vj d . Radulpho Filio Rocelini, j percatam, pro j obolo. Eadwino Pikinden, iiij acras, pro iiij d et ij vomeribus. Radulpho et Austin de Chillenden, ij acras, pro iiij d . Reginaldo de Hundeshate, vj deiwers, pro j d . Radulpho Fabro, deiwerc, pro j obolo. Willelmo de Chillenden, xx acras, pro iij solidis, et iiij d . Rogero de Patinden de Lose, dimidium jugum, pro vj solidis. (Here probably begin the Lose Tenants, the previous ones being of Farlegh.) JEdwine et Wlfklrin, j acram, pro ij' 1 . Nicholao, j acram et j percatam, pro ij d et obolo. Heredibus Deringi, vj acras, pro xij d . Eluord, ij acras, pro iij' 1 . Ricardo et Clriche , 1 x acras, pro iiij solidis. Gromet, ij acras et dimidiam, pro xij' 1 . Ricardo se 1 Blake, ij acras et dimidiam, pro xv d . Julien de Lose, ij acras, pro vj d . Wluard, j deiwerc, pro j d . Clement Dod de Pecham,x acras et dimidiam, pro ij solidis et iij' 1 . (Here probably begin the Peckham Tenants.) Gerard, j acram et iij deiwercs, pro ix d . Heredibus Johannis, ij acras et iij percatas, pro xij d . Heredibus Radulphi Cobbe, dimidiam acram, pro vj d . Wlstan, ij acras et ij deiwercs, pro iiij d . Gileberto de uia, j acram et j percatam, pro vj d et iij vomeribus. Irilde, Vidue, ij acras, et iij percatas, pro x d . Heredibus Johannis, v acras et dimidiam, et dimidiam percatam, pro xviij d et j vomere. Cecilie, Vidue, j percatam et vij deiwercs, pro ij d . Gileberto de uia, x acras de eschart, pro ij solidis et iij d . Radulpho Ane, j percatam, pro j vomere. Volumus vero, ut ii predicti homines nostri, et heredes eorum, prefatas terras, in pace, per constitutas pensiones et consuetudines, in perpetuum teneant. [Endorsed in the handwriting of Sir E. Dering, “ T, ut puto, H. II. vel “ Steph. R.,” and, afterwards, iu pencil, “unus Jaufridus Prior fuit, 5 “ Joh’is.”] Sir F. Madden, finding, by the Monasticon, that “ Gosfridus ” was Prior 1126 to 1128, dates this Charter 26 to 28 H. I. I rather call it temp. Ric. I., in the time of the Galfridus, who was Prior 1191 to 1205, i. e. 3 Ric. I. to 6 John. I think this date suits the character of the writing better than that assigned by Sir F. Madden. We have only one instance of the use of iE diphthong, which rather points to the 13th century than the 12th, when the diphthong was generally used. On the other hand, the following note of documents would imply that some of the parties named in this Charter, or rather their descendants, were considerable holders of Free Rents in 1200 to 1235, making grants them¬ selves to Christ Church, Canterbury, in “pure and perpetual alms,” out of lands held of them by other parties, and thereby indicating that their own tenancies from Christ Church were of an earlier period; yet, perhaps, 1191, forty years before these grants, would be sufficiently early to reconcile the difficulty, and I still abide by the opinion that the Charter is of temp. Ric. I.:— a.d. 1200, June 12.—Emma, widow of Richard de Loses, quitclaims to Thomas Fitz-Geflrey aud Haino Fitz-Mathew, all right in half the Ville of Pirifeld, which she claimed as Dower from her late husband, Richard de Loses. (‘Arcbfeologia Cantiana,’ Pedes Finium, vol. ii. p. 248, no. lxi.) a.d. 1204, November 25.—William de Lose acknowledges the whole Ville of Lose to be the right of the Prior and Convent of Christ Church, Canterbury, who, in return, iuter alia, grant him, in fee farm, for Ss. 4 et teloneus panis reddebat xx solid. Et si extrauei mercatores “ veniebant m civitatem et aeeipiebant hospicium iu terra Sc’e Trinitatis “ vel Sc,i Augustini, tunc habebant sui prepositi.i Sed fuit quidam prepositus “ nom ' ne Brimanuus, qui per totam terram civitatis accepit omnes consue- “tudines et teloneum injuste, de quo fecerunt monachi clamorem Regi “AVillielmo, qui precepit ut iude fuisset ante Episcopum Baiocensem, et “ an te Hugonem de Mundfort, et Comitem Ow, et Rieardum filium Gisle- “berti, qui eum jurare fecerunt ut de hac re verum diceret, quibus post “jusjurandum dixit quod verum toloneum habebat acceptum per totam “ civitatem, sed injuste de terra Sc’e Trinitatis vel Sc’i Augustini. Do “molendiuis vero que sunt infra muros civitatis, si ex utrisque partibus “aque ambe ripe sunt unius senioris, tunc exclusam et molendinum potest “ mutare quo voluerit, ita tamen ut alterius molendino non noceat • et de “ rota moleudini in spatio ij perticarum potest deliberare vi animantes vel “retro, propter emendationem molendini, et ut dictum est alterius senioris “ molendino non noceat. Et si ex una parte aque est ripa unius senioris, “et alterius ex altera, tunc non potest ulla edificacio vel mutacio excluse “ sine licencia illius cujus est altera pars ripe, et ex spacio duarum partieu- “ larum, nisi antea est aqua in dominio Regis. Et si panis aut servicia “ esset iauta alio modo quam constitutum est in antiquo tempore, volebant “inde moi- h’re forisfacturam. Sed Brimannus supradictus prepositus “ accepit lianc forisfacturam sicut ptholoneum. Et omnes vie civitatis que “ habent duas portas, hoc est introitum et exitum, ille sunt de consuetudine “Regis. Et si aliquis facit forisfacturam aliquam unam leucam, et in “ spatio trium perticarum et trium pedum, illam habebunt prepositi Regis 1 buos prepositos ? 2 Sic. “ Solebant inde in communi habere forisfact.”? de civitato. Et si aliquis in hoc supradicto spacio fossam fecerit vel sudem “ miserit vel callem Regis cinxncerit, 8 sine licencia prepositi Regis, quo- “ cumque ierit, ille qui hoc fecerit secuturus erit donee Rex habeat inde “forisfacturam suarn. Regina E. et Alnoth aid. et Osbern Bigga et Sir’d de Chileham, isti habuerunt in civitate consuetudines suns de suis “hominibus. Tholoneus panis reddebat lx s.; et quando Hamo recepit ministerium hujus civitatis erant omnes consuetudines Regis sicut prius, ‘sed modo sunt xxxij burgenses minus, propter escambium castelli, qui u reddebant Regi xl s. et ij d. Ex hiis habet modo Archiepiscopus vij, et ^ Abbas Sc i August, xiiij, et xj sunt perditi infra fossatum castelli. Et “ adhuc sunt cc et xij liberi homines, de quibus habet Rex sacam et socam. “Sutores et draparii reddunt xxx s., et porcarii v s. Molendinum lxv s. “ Tholoneus panis reddit viij sol. plus solito. Et de minutis debitis x s. in tempore Regis Edwardi est appreciatum ministerium lj li. Et quando ‘Harao recepit, similiter; sed t’n qui nunc tenet reddit xxxli. turn in cen- “ slone et pensa. Extra portam civitatis in calde Regis erant due domus, una foris et alia intus, de quibus monachi Sc’e Trinitatis unam destruxe- “ runt, et aliam prohibuerunt ne fuisset facta, que reddebant Regi xvj d. de “gablo. Et in alio loco tantum terre que reddebat iij d. Item deraon- strant burgenses civitatis xlv mansiones terre, unde habebant liij s. de gablo tempore Regis Edwardi, et ipse Rex habebat in sacam et socam. “ Sed omnia nunc tenet Ranulfus de Columbeles et Vitalis de Canterbire “de feuodo Episcopi Baiocensis; sed illi non cognoscunt nisi de xxvj. “ Adhuc tenet idem Rauulfus v agros terre cum una ecclesia, que pertinent “ ad monasterium Sc'i Augustini. Item dicunt burgenses quod idem “ Ranulfus teuet quatuor viginti agros de allodiis eorum, et ipse dicit se eos “ tenere de Episcopo Baiocensi. Adhuc idem Ranulfus tenet xxxiij agros “ terre, quos burgenses semper habuerunt in gilda eorum de donis omnium “regum.” 3 Sic. 35* TABULAE VIEW OF MANORS, ALPHABETICALLY ARRANGED. Ancient Name of Modern Name of Place. In what Hundred, City, or Burgh, Name of Tenant in Chief. Tenant, T. R. E. Under Tenants and other Persons or Depen- Reference to Extens on and Translation. doncies mentioned. Extension; Translation. Acres . . • Acrise . . . Nunnib erg . . Fee of Bishop of Baieux Two Brothers . . . p. 45,11. 24-28. p. 136, 11. 10-14. Addelam Deal .... (Jornelai. . . Bishop oi Baieux, appa- Archbishop Stigand Anschitil the Archdeacon, 1 suling in, p. 5,11.11-16. p. 95, 11. 16-20. rently, or else merely and 50 acres at Deal, and 50 acres Addelam . • Deal .... Cornelai. . . Gustos Bishop of Baieux, appa- Adelold, 3 virges in, as in St. Margaret’s, as a prebend Adelold, 3 virges in, as a prebend p. 5,11. 21-29. p. 95,11. 25-34. rently, or else merely a prebend Abbot of St. Augustine, 1 suling in, Custos Abbot of St. Augustin, as a prebend one suling in, as a pre- William, son of Tedald, half a suling Lantport . . Bishop of Baieux . . bend Derinc, son of Sired, ap¬ parently as a prebend and half a yoke in, apparently as a prebend Al'ETTUNE . . p. 131, 11. 4-7. Aiglessa . . Eccles . . . Laurockesiel . Bishop of Baieux . . Alnod Cilt .... Ralph Fitz-Turold. p. 27,11. 6-13. p. 116,11. 5-12. Bishop of Baieux . . Richard de Tonebrige The King, as of the new gift of the Bishop 3 houses in Rochester Aldelose . . Aldglose, in Bilissold. . . Godoric, in chief . . Osbert holds of William Fitz-Taum . p. 41,11. 21-25. p. 131,11.24-27. HastingLeigh Aldintone . . Aldington . . Belicolt . . . Archbp. ol Canterbury, p. 102, 1. 46. in demesne 25 Burgesses in Romney p. 14,1.19. p. 103,1. 13. 7 Presbyters in Limne p.14,1. 21. p. 103,1. 16. Earl of Ow, Stowting p. 14,1. 26. p. 103, 1. 19. Alham . . . Elham . . . Homnberg . . Bishop of Baieux, in de- Edric, in chief . . . In Demesne. p. 37,11. 2-7. p. 126,11.27-31. mesne Alnoitone . . Elnotmington, Aihorde Bishop of Baieux . . Osuuard, in chief . . Hugh de Port. p. 118,1. 45, to in Hoiling- 3 mansions of land in Rochester “ ad- p. 30, 1. 4. p. 119,1. 6. bourne join" this manor Eltham . . . Grenviz . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Aluuold, in chief . . Haimo. p. 25, 11. 29-33. p. 114,11.26-30. Apeldres . . Appledobe . . BLachebome Archbp. of Canterbury. The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 19,1. 33. p. 108,1. 30. Apletone . . Apdlton, in Bewsberg . . Bishop of Baieux . . Ascored, in chief . . Ralph de Curbespine. p. 43,11. 11-14. p. 133,11. 33-35. W aidenshaw. Arclei . . . Hartley . . Essamle . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Bari Harold, and Hunef held of him Ralph Fitz-Turald. p. 34, 11. 25-29. p. 123,11.33-36. Asmeslant . . In Maresco do Archbp. of Canterbury. The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 19,11. 43-46. p. 108,1.41. Komenel William Folet Aldington . . Aiborde . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Goduuin and Aluuin, in Ansgot of Rochester. p. 29, 11. 39-43. p. 118,11.36-4.0. chief as 2 manors Bacheham . . Beckenham . . Brunlei . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Anschil, in chief . . Ansgot of Rochester. p. 26, 11. 22-26. p. 115,11.21-25. Badelesmere . Badlesmere Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux . . Abbot of St. Augustine Ansfrid. Abbot of St. Augustine p. 39, 11. 11-17. p. 129,11.6-12. Bedenesmere . Maress de Ro- Abbey of St. Augustine No name . p. 140,11.35-36. menel Bedesham . . liistrei . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Godesa, in chief . . Osbert Fitz-Letard. X Thanes p. 43,11. 36-42. p. 134,11.11-17. Belice . . . 1 denn in Rovinden . . Bishop of Baieux . . Adam Fitz-Hubert. Hugo de Montfort p. 37, H. 8-10. p. 51, 11. 26-29. p. 126,11.33-35. p. 142,11.26-29. Beeice . . . Bircholt (Has- Hen .... Hugh de Montfort . . Turgis, in chief . . . ted) but ?Bilcli- erst, in Hawk- Bishop of Baieux . . Alnod Cilt, and Godric Adelold held it of the Bishop . . p. 33, 11. 26-29. p. 122,11.27-30. held of him Robert holds it at farm Benenden . . Rovindene . . Bishop of Baieux . . Osier, in chief . . . Rotbert de Romenel. p. 42,11. 6-9. p. 131,11.19-22. Werelin, in chief . . Wadard. p. 40, 11. 35-39. p. 130,11. 31-34. Berewic . . Archbp. of Canterbury. William de Eddesham (one of the p. 16,1. 25. p. 105,1.20. Archbishop’s Knights) p. 127,11.2-5. Bishop of Baieux . . One poor Woman Rannulf de Coliunbels, but charged to scot in Harden Berham . . . Barham . . Bcrliam . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Stigand, in chief . . Fulbert.. • • Herbei’t Fitz-Ivo, and Berewich, called Huham or Hucham Osbern Paisforeve Rannulf, a Knight p 37,11. 35-50. p. 127,11.22-36. p. 117,11.30-35. Bishop of Baieux . . Sbern Biga, in chief Ralph de Curbespine. p. 28,11. 33-39. Bermelie . . Bishop of Baieux . . Alnod Cilt, and Godric Adelold. West Banning Medestan . . Richard de Tonebrige . held it of him Alret, in chief . . . Ralph de Curbespine. Hugh de Montfort p. 55,11. 10-14. p. 146,11.15-19. Betmontestun . Beamonston, or Beamston-in- Bishop of Baieux . . Ailric, in chief . . • Bevesfel . . W estwell Bewsfleld, alias Comelest . . Abbey of St. Augustine Oidelard. p. 139,11.22-23. Whitfield, beld ofNorthborae 37* TABLE OF MANORS. Ancient. Name of Modem Name of In what Hundred, City, or Burgh, Under Tenants and other Persons or Depen¬ dencies mentioned. Reference to Extension and Translation. (Ancient Name). Extension. Translation. Biohelei . . Bekele, alias Beccles - in - Chalk Medestan, but ? rather not named Bishop of Baieux . . Earl Leuuin, and Vluuin held of him Adam. p. 34, U. 21-24. p. 123,11.28-31. Bilsvitone . . Bilsington . . Nevcerce Bishop of Baieux, in de¬ mesne Alnod Cilt .... In Demesne. Count of Ow p. 41,11. 37-44. p. 131, 1. 41, to p. 132, 1. 2. Bix .... Bexley . . . Helmestrei . Archbp. of Canterbury p. 10, 1. 40. p. 99, 1. 47. Blachemene- STONE Blackmanstone Werde . . . Hugh de Montfort . . Blacheman. Hervey. p. 51, 1. 4. p. 142,11. 3-6. Blehem . . . Bleane . . . W itestaple . . Haimo the Sheriff . . .Norman, in chief . . p. 55,11. 37-41. p. 146,11.41-44. Bocheland . . 1 Yoke in Buck- Favreshant. . Bishop of Baieux . . Leuuard, in chief . . Osbern . p. 39,11. 29 31. p. 129,11. 23-25. Bocheland . . Buckland . . Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux . . Seuuard, in chief . . Osbem. p. 129,11.19-22. Bocheland . . Bbckland, near Dover Beusberg . . Bp. ofBaieux apparently, or else merely Custos Godric, one suling in, apparently as a prebend p. 5, 11. 41-43. p. 96, 1. 1-2. Buckland . . Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux Turgot, in chief . . . Turstin de Girunde. p. 40, 11. 1-3. p. 129,11.40-42. Bochelande Bochelande Buckland, near Dover Beusberg . . Bishop of Baieux, appa¬ rently, or else merely Custos Bishop of Baieux Aluin, one suling in, as a prebend Aluin, one suling in, as a prebend p. 4, 11. 26-28. p. 94,11. 32-34. Bochelande Buckland, near Stotinges . . p. 37,1. 11. p. 126,11. 37-39. Bocoland . . Buckland . . Estrei . . . Archbishop of Canter¬ bury Osbern Fitz-Letard (one of the Arch¬ bishop’s Knights) p. 16,1. 10. p. 105,1. 4. Bodesham . . Bottsham, in Elmsted Stotinges Abbey ot St. Augustine A Yillaner. Gaufrid. p. 140,11.18-20. Bogelei . . . Bewley, in Bougkton Malherb Aihorde . Bishop of Baienx . . Turgis, in chief . . . Adam Fitz-Hubert, a Tenant {homo) Adam has a suling called Mevlea p. 30,11. 20-26. p. 119,11. 21-23. Boltone . . . Boughton Mal¬ herbe Hai borne . . Archbishop of Canter¬ bury Ralph Fitz-Turald, one of the Arch¬ bishop’s Knights p. 15,1. 37. p. 104, 1. 25. Boltone . . . Boughton Mon- chensei Aihorde . . . Bishop ot Baieux Earl Godwin,and Aluuin held of him Hugh, nephew of Herbert .... p. 31,1. 1-5. p. 120,11. l^t. Boltdne . . . Boughton un¬ der the Blean Boltun . . . Archbishop of Canter¬ bury, in demesne p. 102,1. 10. Boltdne . . . Boughton Aluph Wi .... Earl Eustace .... Earl G-odwin, in chief . p. 146,11. 2-6. Bonintone . . Bonnington. . Estraites . . Hugh de Montfort . . Norman, in chief . . William Fitz-Grosse. p. 53,11. 50-54. Boechetelle . Borstall . . Rovecestre . . Bishop of Rochester 80 messuages in Rochester belong to Borchetelle and Fraudesberie p. 21,1. 25. p. 110,1. 22. p. 110,1. 26. Borham . . . Burham . . . Laurochesfel . Bishop of Baieux . . Earl Leuuin .... Ralph de Curbespine. Bishop of Rochester p. 28,11. 40-46. p. 117,11.36-40. Borne . . . Patrixborne Brige. . . . Bishop ot Baieux . . Richard Fitz-William. p. 35, 1. 16. p. 124,11. 32-37. Borne . . . (?) Patrixborne or Littleborne Brige.... Abbey of St. Augustine, Themselves Demesne. p. 46,11. 16-21. p. 137, 11. 6-9. Boseleu . . . Boxley . . . Medestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . Alnod Cilt. Rotbert Latin, at farm. Helto One Frenchman p. 33,11. 34-40. p. 122,11.36-43. Bradeburne Braborne . . Bilissold. . . Bishop of Baieux . . Godric, in chief . . . Beebdene . . Braboene . . Berisovt. . . Hugh de Montfort part. Bishop of Baieux part Godric de Burnes, in chief p. 53,11. 23-29. p. 144,11. 27-32. Briestede . . Brasted . . . Achestan . . Archbishop of Canter¬ bury Haimo, the Sheriff, one of the Arch¬ bishop’s Knights Abbot Alnod formerly held it of the Archbishop p. 15,11. 23-30. p. 104,11.13-18. Brochestele . Temple or Bos¬ well Banks in Ewell (j Hasted) Bevsberg . . Fee of Bishop of Baieux, now Hugh V Inod, in chief . . . Herfrid. p. 43,11. 15-18. p. 133,11.36-39. Brochestele . Temple, or Bos¬ well Banks in Ewell Estrei, but surely Bevs- berge Bishop of Baieux Molleue, in chief. . . Ralph de Curbespine. p. 136,11. 1-2. Bronlei . . . Bromley. . . Bronlei . Bishop of Rochester Rrotettam . . Wrotham . . Broteham . Archbishop of Canter¬ bury William Despencer (Dispensator) Goisfrid Farman Richard de Tonebrige p.100,11. 24-39. Brunfelle . . Broomfield . . Aihorde . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Earl Godwin, and Aluuin held of him Rotbert Latin, at farm. Adelold held it of the Bishop A piece of free land belongs to this Manor p. 31,11. 31-38. p. 120,11.27-32. Burgum de Ro- MENEL Burgh of Rom¬ ney Lantport . . Bishop of Baieux (?) Rotbert de Romenel Earl Godwin, and Alsi held of him Rotbert de Romenel, who has 1 bur¬ gesses in Romney, the king having all their service p. 41,11. 51-53. p. 131,11.10-13. Bhenes . . . Bishofsbourne . Berham . . Archbishop of Canter¬ bury, in demesne p. 182, 1. 4. Boenes . . . Bekesborne . . Brige.... Bishop of Baieux, in demesne Leuinc, in chief . . . Hugh de Monfort once held it. . . Rannulf, at farm p. 35, 11. 30-37. p. 125,11. 4-10. Burwar Maresc Burmarsh . . Maress de Ro- menel Abbey of St. Augustine, Themselves p. 140,11.32-34. Canthaeia . . 38* Certain Bur¬ gesses and Mansures,and a mill in Can¬ terbury Oivitas Can- tuaria Archbishop of Canter¬ bury 12 Burgesses The Clergy of the Town for their Guild p. 10,11. 2-4. p. 99, 11.14-15. TABLE OF MANORS. Ancient Name of Place. Modern Name of Place. In what Hundred, City, or Burgh, (Ancient Name). The hundred Hundret et Ci- D0MUS and City ot Canterbury vitas Cantuarite Celca • • • Chalk . . Medestan, but (?) rather “not named ” (?) Eastchurch Mildetone . . Cerletone . . Charlton . . Grenviz . . Cerlentone . Charlton, near Dover Beusberg . . Certeham . . Chartham . . Feleberg . . Great Chart . Cert .... Chart Sutton . Aihorde . . Ceteham . . Chatham . . Ceteham. . . Chenetone, et Kennington (?) Langebrige jacuit in Bor- chemeres ( L.B.L .) Chenoxtone Knowlton . . Estrei . . . Cherinche- ? (perhaps h'erleberg . . IIEXXE Charing Hill) Cheringes Charing . . Gale Helle . . Chestan . . Keston . . . Helmestrei . . Cildresham . . Luddenham (?) (Hasted) Eavresliant . Cileham . . Chilham . . Feleberge . . Cixxedene . . Chillenden . . Estrei . . . ClRESPEX . . Chelsfield . . Helmestrei . . Cistelet . . Chislet . . . Uistelet . . . Civttas Cantu- City op Canter- City of Canter- bury bury Ciyitas Rove- City op Roches- City of Roches- cestre ter ter Clive . . . Cliffe . . . Essamels . . Clive . . . Cliff . . . Essamle . . COOLESTANE Cuxton . . . Essamele . CoDEHAM Cudham . . Helmestrei. . COLINGE . . Cowling . . Medestan, but (?) rather not named Colleges . . COWLTNG . . Essamle . . COLRET . . COLDRED . . Bevsberg . . Crai .... Boot’s Cray Helmestrei . . Craie . . . Paul’s Cray . Helmestrei . . Craie . . . North Cray . Helmestrei . . Croctune . . Crawton, alias Crofton - in - Orpington Helmestrei . . CcMBE . . . Combe-in-Bra- Danetone . . Denton . . . Estrei . . . Danitone . Denton . . . Essamele . . Darenden . . Derrington-in- W i (surely Delce . . . Barham (L.B.L.) Bridge) Great Delce, with Lower Delce Rovecestre . . ie of Tenant in Chiof. Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux, appa¬ rently, or else merely Gustos Archbp. of Canterbury Archbp. of Canterbury Bishop of Baieux . . Bishop of Baieux . . Abbey of St. Augustine, Themselves Bishop of Baieux . . Abbey of St. Augustine Archbp. of Canterbury, in demesne Bishop of Baieux . . Bishop of Baieux . . Bishop of Baieux . . Bishop of Baieux . . Bishop of Baieux . . Abbey of St. Augustine, Themselves King William . . . Archbp. of Canterbury Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Rochester Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Baieux Bishop of Rochester Abbey of St. Augustine Bishop of Baieux Tenant, T. R. E. Under Tenants and other Persons or Depen- Reference to Extens on and Translation. Extension. Translation. Adam Fitz-Hubert. p. 36,11. 3-5. p. 127,11.27-28. Adam. p. 33,1. 49, to p. 123,11. 7-14. The King to value of 7 shillings of p. 34,1. 7. the new gift of the bishop 8 Haughs in Rochester In Exesse a hide belonging to this Manor, held by Goduin, son of Dude- man, and now Rannulf Peurel holds Osuuard . . . it (? in Essex) Hugh de Port. p. 35,11. 6-8. p. 124,11.18-20. Goduin and Alard, 2 William Fitz-Oger. p. 25,11.43-47. p. 114,11.40-43. brothers, in chief, as 2 manors Leuuin, as a prebend . Ralph de St. Sanson, as a prebend . p. 4,11.17-25. p. 94,11. 25-31. Sired, one suling in William, Son of Oger, one suling, etc. The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 18,1. 26. p. 107,1.21. Alnod Cilt .... The Arch bishop’s Monks .... p. 18,1. 37. * p. 107,1. 32. Adam Fitz-Hubert. p. 30,11. 10-14. p. 119,11.12-15. Earl Godwin . . . Rotbert Latin, at farm of the p. 32,11. 2-8. p. 121,11. 2-6. Bishop p. 140,11.25-30. Eduuard, in chief . Turstin. p. 43,11. 33-35. p. 134,11. 8-10. Ansfrid. p. 48,11.1-3. p. 138,1. 43, to p. 139,1.2. p. 102,1.17. Sbeme Biga, in chief . Gislebert Maminot. p. 26,11.13-16. p. 115,11.11-14. A Knight p. 128,11. 37-41. Sired, in chief.... Fulbert. 13 messuages in Canterbury p. 38,11.25-33. p. 128,11.19-25. Godwin, in chief, and 5 Usbern Eitz-Letard. p. 44,11.12-16. p. 134,11.39-42. other Thanes . . . Tochi, in chief . . . Krnulph de Hesding. p. 24,11. 39-44. p. 113,11. 32-36. 4 French Knights . p. 47,11. 6-12. p. 137,1. 42, to p. 138,1.1. King Edward . . Haimo, the Sheriff. Bishop of Baieux The Archbishop of Canterbury p. 6,11.1-47. p. 96,11. 6-40. Abbot of St. Augustine Rannulph de Columbels Ralph de Curbespine,4 messuages for¬ merly held by Harold’s Concubine Churches of St. Trinity, St. Augustine, and the land of Queen Eddeva, and Alnod Cilt and Esber Biga and Siret de Cilleham A Reeve called Brumen, in King Edward’s time, cited as having been out of King Edward’s Soc. Bishop of Baieux. p. 6,11.48-49. p. 96,11.41-42. The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 17,11.41-45. p. 106,11.36-40. Aluric and Ordric, two Ernulf de Hesding. p. 34,11.34-37. p. 123,11.41-44. brothers, in chief p. 110,1.1. Gislebert Maminot. p. 26,1. 8. p. 115,1. 7. Earl Leuuin, and Yluuin Adam. p. 34,11.15-20. p. 123,11.22-29. held of him Richard de Tonebrige Odo. p. 34,11.44-46. p. 124,11. 7-9. Molleue, in chief . . Ralph de Curbespine. p. 42,11.49-53. p. 133,11.15-18. William Fitz-Oger. p. 114,11. 44, to 26,1. 2. p. 115,1. 2. Anschitil de Ros. p. 25,11.12-15. p. 114,11. 8-11. Alnod Cilt, and Aluuin Anschitil de Ros. p. 25, li. 16-30. p. 114,11.12-17. held of him Aluuin, in chief, as 2 Anschitil. p. 26,11. 3-7. p. 115,11. 3-6. Manors Leuret de Rochinge, in Wadard. p. 40,11. 40-44. p. 130,11.35-29 chief Molleue, in chief . . Ralph de Curbespine. p. 45,11.10-14. p.21,1. 6. p. 135,11.40-44 p. 110,1.6. Adam. p 47,11. 37, 38. p. 138,11.26,27 Godric, in chief . . . The Son of William Tahum . . . p. 32,11.10-14. p. 121,11; 7-10. 39* TABLE OE MANORS. Modem Name of In wliat Hundred, City, or Burgh, (Ancient Name). Name of Tenant in Chief. Tenant, T. B. E. Under Tenants and other Persons or Depen- Beference to Extension and Translation. Place. Place. denoies mentioned. Extension. Translation. Deloe . . . Little Delce, alias Upper Deice Rovecestre . . Bishop of Baieux . . Osuuard, ir chief . . Ansgot of Rochester. p. 32,11.15-18. p. 121,1L11-14. Dene . . . Dean Court, in Westwell Bishop of Baieux . . Vlnod, ' Waua, Aluuard, Vlueron, in chief. Adelold. Ralph de Curbespine Now in the King’s hands p. 41,11.1-8. p. 130,1.45, to p. 131,1.8. Dictune . . Ditton . . . Laurochesfel . Bishop of Baieux . . Sbern, in c lief . . . Haiino, the Sheriff. p. 26,11. 42-47. p. 115,11.39-43. Dodeham . . Doddington Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux . . Sired, in chief . . . Fulbert. 5 Haughs in Canterbury p. 40,11.15-20. p. 130,11.12-17. Douere . . . Dover . . . V ilia do Douere King William (appa¬ rently) King Edward (appa¬ rently) Bishop of Baieux, Gustos .... Robert de Romenel. Ralph de Curbespine William, son of Tedald William, son of Oger William, son of Tedold Robert Niger William, son of Goisfrid Hugh de Montfort Durand Rannulph de Columbels W adard The son of Modbert Humphry Loripes Roger de Ostrehan Herbert, son of Ivo p.2,11.22,35,45. p. 2,11. 26-45. p.93,11.13,20,29. p. 93, 11. 22-30. Dovere . . . Laid into the guild of Dover Estrei . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Wibert. Osbert Fitz-Letard p. 44,11. 5-7. p. 134,11.33-34. Dovere . . . A mill in Dover Devs berg . . Bishop of Baieux . . Hugh. p. 42,11.43, 44. p. 133, 11. 9, 10. Ece .... 1 yoke in Ash, next WlNGHAM Summerclene (?) surely Estrei Turstin. p. 44,11. 32, 33. p. 135,11.14-16. Ece .... Ash, near Sand¬ wich Estrei . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Bemolt, in chief . . Osbert Fitz-Letard. p. 44, 11. 45-47. p. 135,11.27-29. Edesham . . Ad is ham . . . Estrei . . . Archbishop of Canter¬ bury The Archbishop’s Monks .... 2 of the Archbishop’s Knights p 19,11.18-27. p. 108,11.16-23. Eddintone . . Addington . . Achestan (?) . Bishop of Baieux . . Lestan, in Alnod Gilt Agelred, in chief . . Ralph Fitz-Turald. p. 22,11. 21-25. p. 111,11.19-22. Eddintone . . Addington . . Laurochesfel Bishop of Baieux . . chief . . Ralph Fitz-Turald. p. 27, 11.45-50. p. 116,11.39-43. Eisse .... Ash .... Achestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . (ioclric, in chief . . . Hugh de Port.[slaves A Knight, having 8 male and female 2 Tenants of lands called Didele and Soninges, who, T. R. E., could go where they chose Richard de Tonebrige p. 22,11. 36-44. p. Ill, 11. 31-39. Elentun . . . Allington . . Laurochesfel . Bishop of Baieux . . Alnod Gilt held of hi and Vluric n Anschitil. p. 26,11. 36-41. p. 115,11.34-38. Elesford . . Aylesford . . Laurochesfel . King William. . . . King Edward.... Haimo, the Sheriff’. Ansgotus Bishop of Rochester p. 8, 11. 32-41. p. 98, 11. 25-33. Elesford . . Eynsford . . Achestan . . Archbishop of Canter¬ bury Ralph Fitz-Unspac, one of the Arch¬ bishop’s Knights Richard de Tonebrige p. 15,11. 9-16. p. 104, H. 1-7. Erclei . . . Hartley . . . Achestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . A certain Woman, but (?) in chief Ralph Fitz-Turald. p. 22,11. 17-20. p. 111,11.15-18. Erhede . . . Crayford . . Litelai Archbp. of Canterbury. Ansfrid. j messuage in Canterbury Rannulf p. 10,1. 46. p. 100,1. 6. Ernoltun . . Elwerton, in Stone, next Faversham Favreshant . Bishop of Baieux . . Burnod, in chief. . . p. 39,11. 1-7. p.128,11.42-129, 1. 2. Esledes . . . Leeds . . . Aihorde . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Earl Leuuin .... Adelold. Abbot of St. Augustine, half a solin in, in exchange for the park of the Bishop of Baieux Earl of Ow, 4 denns p. 29, 11. 30-38. p. 118,11.29-35. Eslinges . . . Easling . . . Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux . . Ynlot, in chief . . . Roger Fitz-Anschitil. p. 40,11. 4-8. p. 130, 11. 1-5. Eslinges. . . Easling . . . Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux Sired, in chief. . . . Fulbert. Hugh Fitz-Fulbert p. 40,11. 9-14. p. 130,11. 6-11. Esmerefel . . Eshmerfleld alias Ashen- fiel, in Wal¬ tham (Hasted) Wi . . . . (surely Bridge) Abbey of St. Augustine p. 47,11. 34-36. p. 138,11. 23-25. Esmetone . . Elmington, in Eythorne ( Hasted) Summerdene (?) surely Estrei Bishop of Baieux . . Sired, in chief . . . Osbert. One Presbyter p. 135,11.19-21. Esnoiland . . Snodland . . Wot named, for it cannot be Bronte Bishop ot Rochester p. 109,1. 40. Essamelesford. Shalmsford, in Chartham Ferliberg . . Bishop of Baieux . . Alrec, in chief . . . Herfrid. p. 41,11.17 20. p. 131,11.19-22. Essedene . . Nashenden . . Laurochesfel . Bishop of Baieux . . Ear l Leuuin .... Rannulf de Columbels. p. 27, 11. 31-35. p. 116,11.27-30. Essella . . . Hugh de Montfort . . 3 men who could go with their lords whither they chose, in chief p. 50, 11. 20 23. p. 141,11.19-22. Essetesford (alia) Another Ash¬ ford Langebrige. . Hugh de Montfort . . Wirelm, in chief. . . Maigno. p. 50, 11. 24-28. p. 141,11. 23-27. 40 * TABLE OF MANORS. Ancient Name of Place. Modem Name of Place. In what. Hundred, City, or Burgh, Name of Tenant in Chief. Tenant, T. R. E. Under Tenants and other Persons or Depen- Reference to Extension and Translation. (Ancient Name). dencies mentioned. Extension. Translation. aElvetone . . Elmstone . . Prestetum . Abbey of St. Augustine Godessa, alodiary . . Ansfrid. p. 49,11. 5-12. p. 140,11. 8-13. Essewelle . . Eastwell (Has¬ ted); (?) Wells Estrei (but if Eastwell, not Bishop of Baieux . . Molleue, in chief. . . Ralph de Curbespine. p. 44,11. 48-51. p. 135,11.30-32. in Eastry so) Estanbs . . . Stone . . . Not named . . Bishop of .Rochester p. 109,1. 8. Werde . . . p. 20,1. 15. p. 109, 1. 14. Estbrige . . Eastbridgk . Hugh de Montfort, in Earl Groduuin, and Alsi p. 141,11.41—45. demesne held of him Estefort . . Ashford . . . Langebrige. . Hugh de Montfort . . Earl Goduin, and Turgis Maigno. p. 50,11. 16-19. p. 141,11.15-18. held of him Estenberge . . Statenborodgh Hstrei Archbishop of Canter- William Folet (one of the Archbishop’s p. 16,1. 14. p. 105,1. 8. How .... bury Knights) Estoches . . Stoke . . . Bishop of Rochester Earl Goduin, by fraud . 2 Men, tenants of the Bishop, T. R. E. Bishop of Baieux p. 21,11. 29-38. p. 110,11.31-39. Estochinge- Stokenbdry, in Litefelle . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Ralph Fitz-Turold. p. 29,1. 7. p. 118,11. 6,7. East Peckham Estotinghes . Stowting . . Belicolt . . . Archbp. of Canterbury. Earl of Ow. p. 14,1.26. p. 103,1. 19. Street, in Limne Estraites Hugh de Montfort . . Vlnod, in chief . . . Hugh de Manneuile. p. 52,11. 34-38. p. 143,11. 36-39. Estrei . . . Eastry . . . Estrei . . . Archbp. of Canterbury . The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 19,1. 8. p. 108,1. 8. Estselve . . East Shelve, al. Shelve Cobham, in Lenliam Aihorde . . . Bishop ol Baieux . . Vluiet, in chief . . . Hugo, nephew of Herbert .... p. 31,11.17-20. p. 120,11.14-17. Est Selve . . Old Shelve, in Aihorde . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Godric, in chief . . . Adam Fitz-Hubert. p. 30,11. 39-42. p. 119,11. 38-41. Lenliam (?) Estdrei . . Sturrey . . . Esturai . . . Abbey of St. Augustine, p. 46,11.41-47. p. 137,11.28-32. Themselves Estdrsete . . Westgate . Estursete Archbp. of Canterbury, p.101,1. 39, to in demesne 25 Messuages in Canterbury (for¬ merly 52) Five of the Archbishop’s Men Haimo, the Sheriff p. 13,1. 8. p. 102,1.2. Estwellf. . . Eastwell . . Hugh de Montfort . . Part of the Fee of the Frederic, in chief . . p 50,11. 1-7. p. 141,11.1-6. Bishop of Baieux Eswalt . . . St. Alban’s, in Nonington Estre . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Alnod Cilt, in chief . . p. 127, 11. 6-9. Newcerce . . Hugh de Montfort, but Vluuile W ilde, in chief, p. 141,11. 35-39. claimed by Canons of St. Martin, Dover in alodio p. 144,11. 7-11. Ewell . . . Bevsberge . . Hugh de Montfort . . Molleue. p. 53,11.1-6. Etwelle, xiiij Ewell ( Hasted ) Langebrige Hugh de Montfort . . Herbert Fitz-Ivo held “Etwelle,” p. 52, 11. 49, 50. p. 144,11. 3, 4. acrte de but?in Hering- hill, see f Has- (? Beusberge) • ‘ Infra divisionem suam” extra divisionem Hugonis p. 132,11.40-46. Bevsberg . . Bishop of Baieux . . Edric de Aiham, in chief Hugh. p. 42,11. 26-32. Hugh de Montfort Bishop of Baieux . . Molleue, in chief . . Ralph de Curbespine. p. 133,11.19-25. Hugh de Montfort now A Knight p. 43,1. 4. p. 109,1.15. JSot named . . Bishop of Rochester Pane, una A denne inVAN- Blacheburne, Hugh de Montfort, in p. 145,11. 24,25. Adam’s Manor Adam. Hugh de Montfort p. 40,11. 30-34. Fanne . . . Yanne, or Vannes, in Bishop of Baieux . . p. 130,11. 2 7-30. Crundal King Edward . . . Tenants of 3 Haughs in Canterbury p. 9,1.19-26. p. 99,11. 5-10. Aihorde . Bishop of Baieux . . Earl Goduuin, and Hugh, nephew of Herbert .... part of Har- Aluuin held ot him Ferebdrne . . rietsham West Farborn, Aihorde . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Sbern Biga, in chief . Ralph Curbespine. p. 31,11. 44-47. p. 120,11.38-41. Ferlaga . . in Harrietsham East Farleigh . Medestan . . Archbp. of Canterbury. The Archbishop’s Monks .... Godefry, in fee Abel Richard de Tonebrige p. 17,11. 31-41. p. 106,11. 26-35. Ferlaga . . West Farleigh Tviferde . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Aluod, in chief . . • Rannulf de Columbels, 3 yokes of it . Rayner, 1 yoke of it in Pimpe Manor p. 32, 1. 46, to p. 33,1. 2. p. 121, 1.41, to p. 122,1. 6. Ferlingeham . Farningham Achestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . Brunesune, and could change, with his land, Malgerius. The King holds to the value of 8s. p. 23, 11. 6-10. p. 112, 11. 5-8. Ferlingelai Beusberg . . Bishop of Baieux, appa- Sired, one suling in, as William, son of Geoffrey, one suling in, as a prebend p. 5,11. 33-38. p. 95, 11. 42-44. V enson Dane, in rently, or else merely a prebend Ferningeham . Hougham Farningham Achestan . . Custos Bishop of Baieux . . Estan, and could change at his pleasure Dering, and could Wadard. p. 23,11. 22-28. p. 112,11.18-23. Ferningeham . Farningham Achestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . Ernulph de Hesding . The King has wood to the value of 8s. p. 23,11. 33-38. p. 112,11.28-33. Flengdessa . . Finglesham Estrei . . . Archbp. of Canterbury. William Folet (one of the Arch- p. 16,1. 12. p. 105,1. 6. Fletes . . . Fleet . . . Wingeham . . Archbp. of Canterbury. William de Arcis .. p. 13,1. 41. p. 102,11.34-36. Forewfc . . Fordwich . . Forewic . . . Abbey of St. Augustine, Themselves . Earl Goduin. Bishop of Baieux King Edward p. 47,11.13-28. p. 138,11. 3-16. King William Archbishop Lanfranc has 7 messuages 41* TABLE OE MANORS. In wlmt Hundred, City, or Burgh, (Ancient Name). Name of Tenant in Chief. Tenant, T. R. E. Under Tenants and other Persons or Depen- Place. Place. dencics mentioned. Extension. Translation. Forningeham . Farningham Achestan . . Archbp. of Canterbury. Ansgotus, one of the Archbishop's p. 15,11. 2-8. p. 103,11.42^.6. Knights Richard de Tonebrige The Monks of Canterbury Frandesberie . Frindsbdry Bssamele . . Bishop of Rochester p.110,11.15-19. Richard de Tonebrige p.21,1. 19. p. 110,1. 20. 80 messuages in Rochester belong to p.21,1. 25. p. 110,1. 26. Frandesberie and Borchetelle Fredenestede . Frinstead . . Aihorde Bishop of Baieux . . Leuuin, in chief Hugh, nephew of Herbert, and Ade- p. 29,11. 26-29. p. 118,11.25-28. lold, the Chamberlain Fulchestan Folkestone Fulchestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . Earl Uoduin . . . . William de Arcis. p. 125,1. 39, to The Archbp. has 55s. from 5 Churches Hugh Fitz-William p. 126,1. 25. Walter de Appeuile Alured Walter Fitz-Engelbert Wesman Alured Dapifer Eudo Bernard de St. Audoen Baldric Richard Gecham . . . IcKHAM . . . ilunehaml'ort . Archbp. of Canterbury. The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 18,11. 3-8. p. 106, 1. 49, to William, the Archbishop’s Man p. 107, 1. 3. Gelingeham Gillingham . . Ceteham. . . Archbishop of Canter- bury A Certain Frenchman (Francigena) Gelingeham Gillingham . . Aihorde, but(?) Ceteham (for “ Ceteham ” is at end of it as much as at be- ginningofnext) Bishop of Baieux Odo. p. 120, 1. 42. Getinge . . . Geddinges . . Estrei . . . Archbp. of Canterbury. The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 19,1. 13. p. 108, 1. 12. Gocistone . . Guston . . . Beusberg . . Bishop of Baieux, appa- Elric, one yoke in, as a Ulric, one yoke in, as a prebend, with 25 acres in Cornilai hundred p. 4, 11. 29-32. p. 94, 11. 35-37. rently, or else merely Gustos prebend Godeselle . . Goldwell in Aihorde (?) . . Bishop of Baieux Eduuin, in chief, and Hugo, nephew of Herbert .... p. 31, 11. 6 10. p. 120, 11. 5-8. Great Chart, but (?) {Wasted) could go with his land where he chose Gollesberge . Estrei . . . Bishop oi Baieux . . . . . Thanes, in chief Ansfrid. p. 43, 11. 23-32. p. 133, 1. 44, to xxxij messuages in Sandwich Adeluuold p. 134,1. 7. Gomersham . . Godmersham . Feleberg . . Archbp. of Canterbury. The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 18,1. 32. p. 107, 1. 26. Gravenel . . Graveney . . Boltone . . . Archbishop of Canter- Richard, the Archbishop’s man p. 15, 11. 46-50. p. 104,11.34-37. bury (Knight) The Monks of Canterbury Gravesham . . Gravesend . . Tollentrev . . Bishop ol Baieux . . Leuric, ~| Vluuin, >in 3 manors Herbert Fitz-Ivo. p. 117,11.14-18. Goduin, J Grenviz . . . Greenwich . . Grenviz . . « Bishop of Baieux . . Earl Harold, (then in Brixi, J 2 manors Bishop of Lisieux. p. 25, 11. 21 28. p. 114,11.19-25. Hadone . . . Haydon, alias Essamle . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Osuuard, in chief . . Emulf de Hesding. p. 34, 11. 37-43. p. 124, 11. 1-6. The Mount, in Cobham Odo Hagei.ei . . . Hawley, in Set- Achestan . . Hugh de Fort . . . King Edward.... Hugh de Port. p. 98, 11.17-24. ton-at-Hone Osuuard the Sheriff The Bishop of Rochester Hagelei . . . Hawley . . . Achestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . Hugh de Forth. Uluret p. 22, 11. 3-8. p. Ill, 11. 3-8. Haintone . . Heyton, in Stanford (L. B. L.) Yalding . . . Hugh de Montfort . . Vlsi, presbytei’, in chief p. 50,11. 8-10. p. 141,11. 7-9. Hallinges . . Tviferde. . . Richard de Tonebrige . Aldret, in chief . . . Hallinges . . Halling . Fssamele Bishop ot Rochester Ham .... Estrei . . . Bishop of Baieux Three Thanes, in chief Osbern Pitz-Letard .... Hamestede . . Bevsberge . . Bishop of Baieux 2 Free Men, in Boche- land Rannulf de Valbadon. . . . p. 136,11. 6-8. Hamolde alias Hamwolde, in Estrei . . . Fee of Bishop of Baieux Riculf, tenant of Adam, and Herbert, p. 42,11. 23-25. p. 132,11. 37-38. Aimolde WoODNES- now, Adam and Hugh tenant of Hugh, nephew of Herbert BOROUGH nephew of Herbert Hanehest . . Henhurst . . Essamle . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Earl Goduin, and Goduin Ansgot of Rochester .... held of him ITardes . . . Upper Hardres Brige.... Bishop of Baieux, in de- Eduin, in chief . . . Rannulf, at farm .... p. 35, 11. 22-25, p. 124,11.38-41. mesne Azor, in chief . . . Hardes . . . Nether, alias Brige.... Bishop ot Baieux . . Ranulf de Columbels. p. 125,11.11-14. LowerHardres ITariardesham . Harrietsham . Aihorde . . . Bishop ot Baieux . . Osuuard, in chief . . Hugh, nephew of Herbert . . . Haslow . . . Hadlow . . . Litefelle . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Eddeua, in chief . . . Richard de Tonebrige .... p. 29, 11. 2 7. Hastingelai HASTINGLEIGn . Briceode . . Fee of Bishop ot Baieux Vlnod, in chief . . . Roger, son of Anschitil . . p. 45, 11. 29-35. Hugh de Montfort, a part Hastingelie, 4 Snling in Beriscolt . . Hugh de Montfort Vlnod, in chief . . . A certain Man . . . p. 145,11. 27-29. Dimidium So- HASTINGLEIGn 42 * TABLE OE MANORS. Ancient Name of Place. Modern Name of Place. In what Hundred, City, or Burgh, (Ancient Name). Name of Tenant in Chief. Tenant, T. R. E. Under Tenants and other Persona or Depen- Reference to Exten ion and Translation. Extension. Translation. Hecham . . . Higham ,. . . Medestan, but ? rather not Bishop of Baieux . . Goduin, son of 1 as 2 Carte, and Toli J manors Adam . In Exesse, pasture for 200 sheep p. 34,11. 8 14. p. 123,11.15-21. Herbretitov . Herste . . . Harbilton in Harrietsham ?HERS' rHALL,an outlying piece Aihorde . . . Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux . . Bishop of Baieux . . Earl Godwin, and Aluric held of him Osuuard, in chief . . (? for Essex) Robert Latin, at farm. Adelold held it of the Bishop Hugh de Portli . p. 31, 11. 26-30. p. 39, 11. 32-35. p. 120,11. 23-26. p. 129,11.26-28. of Murston, surrounded by Loddenham Hertange . . Hartanger, in Baeprestone Estrei . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Eddid, in chief . . . Ralph Fitz-Robert ...... p. 43,11.47 50. p. 134,11.21-24. Hicham . . . Hougham . . Beusberg . . Bp. of Baieuxapparently, Eduin, one siding in, ap¬ parently, as a prebend Baldwin, one suling in, apparently as p. 5, 11. 39-40. p. 95, 11. 45-47. Hoilingebordk . Hollingboorne Aihorde . . . or else merely Gustos Archbp. of Canterbury . a prebend The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 17, 11.19 24. p. 106,11.11-16. Hortone . . . Horton, in Chartham Ferleberge . . Bishop of Baieux . . Godric, in chief . . . The Bishop of Baieux Ansfrid . p. 40, 11. 25 29. p. 130,11.22-25. Horton e . . . Monks Horton Stotinges . . Hugh de Montfort . . Leuuin, in chief . . Horton . . . Monks Horton Stotinges . . Hugh de Montfort . . 2 Sochmen, in chief Hortune. . . Horton . . . Achestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . Godel held it of Brixi, Anschitil de Ros . p. 112, 1. 43, to and could go, with his The King has wood to the value of 5 p. 24, 1. 5. p. 113,1. 2. Horton, £ a So- land, where he chose Hortcne . . Achestan . . Bishop ot Baieux . . Ording, in chief . . . Anschitil de Ros . p. 24,11. 6-9. p. 113,11. 3-6. Hortcne . . Horton, 1 Solin Achestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . Harold,and Aluuardheld Anschitil de Ros . p. 24,11. 10-15. p. 113,11. 7-10. in of him Hov .... Howbery . . Litelai Bishop of Baieux . . Anscliil, in chief . . . Ansgotus . p. 24,11. 23-26. p. 113,11.18-21. Hov .... Hoo, St. War- Hov .... Bishop of Baieux, in Earl Goduin .... 9 houses in Rochester pertain to it . p. 32,11. 23—40. p. 121,11.19-35. burgh demesne Richard de Tonebrige Adam Fitz-Hubert Anschitil de Ros Huham alias A Berewick in JBerham . Bishop of Baieux . . Hubertin Fitz-ivo. p. 37,1. 42. p. 127,11.27-28. Hu chain Barham (.? Hougham) Hulviz, lxiij 63 acres in Wool- Grenviz . . . Haimo, the Sheriff . . William the Hawker, p. 55,11. 25 27. p. 146,11. 30-32. acrffi in wich in chief Lamport . . Langport . . Lamport . . Archbp. of Canterbury . Robert de Romenel (one of the Arch- bishop’s Knights) 21 Burgesses in Romney p. 16,11. 30-38. p. 105, 11.25-31. Langafel . . Longfield . . JSIot, named . . Bishop ot Rochester p. 109,1.19. Langvelei . . Langley . . Aihorde Bishop of Baieux Turgis, in chief . . . Adam Fitz-Hubert . p. 30,11. 28 31. p. 119,11. 28-32. Lanport . . . Longport, Bo- Brige . . . Abbey of St. Augustine, p.46,11. 22 29. p. 137,11.10-15. rough and Ma¬ nor in Canter¬ bury Longport, in Themselves Lanport . . . Stotinges (?) . Abbey of St. Augustine, Themselves p. 140,11.21-23. Canterbury Lasela . . . Langley, in Helmestrei . Bishop of Baieux . . Brixi Cilt, in chief . . Goisfrid de Ros. p. 25,11.5-11. p. 114,11. 1-7. Beckenham, Richard de Tonebrige according to Hasted; but (?) Seale, though The King it is another Hundred Haimo, the Sheriff. Latintone . . Hackington, al. St. Stephen’s Lgddesdowne . Cantuariensis . Bishop of Baieux . . Burgesses of Canter bury p. 36,11. 6-14. p. 125,11.30-37. Ledesdone . . Tollentrev . . Bishop of Baieux . . Earl Leuuin .... Ralph Fitz-Turold . 4 houses in Rochester p. 28,11. 7-14. p. 117,11. 7-18. Lee .... Lee .... Bishop of Baieux . . Aluuin, in chief . . . Walter de Douuai . p. 25,11. 39-42. p. 114,11.36-39. IjELEBURNE . . Laurochesfel . Bishop of Baieux . . Turgis, of Earl Goduin . Adam . p. 26, 11. 27-35. p. 115,11.27-33. Richard de Tonebrige The King, as of the new gift of the Bishop, to value of 24s. 4rt. Leminges . . Lyminge . . Moniberge . . Archbp. of Canterbury, in demesne 6 Burgesses in Hythe 3 of the Archbishop’s Men p. 103,11.25-34. Lerham . . . Lenham . . . Calehelle . . Archbp. of Canterbury . Godfrey Dapifer (one ot the Arch¬ bishop’s Knights) p. 16, 1 . 2. p. 104,1. 38. Lertham . . Lenham . . . Haihorne Abbey of St. Augustine, Robert Latin. p. 46,11.10-15. p. 136, 1. 45, to p. 42,11. 45-48. Leueberge . . Fee of Bishop of Baieux, Leuuin, in chief . . . Altet . p. 133,11. 11-14. p. 43,11. 19-21. p. 133,11.40-42. Leoeberge . . Bevsberg . . Bishop of Baieux, now Boche, in chief . . • Turstm Tinel, at farm of the King . Levelant . . Leveland . . in the King's hands Archbp. of Canterbury . Abbey of St. Peter’s, Richard, the Archbp.’sMan (Knight) p. 15,1.43. p. 104,11.30-33. Levesham . . Lewisham . Abbey of St. Peter’s, Gaud p. 103,1.15. Limes, land in, Limne . . . Belicolt . . . Archbp. of Canterbury . belonging to Aldington Manor Liteburne . . Littleboorne . Dunamesfort . Abbey of St. Augustine, Themselves p. 46,11. 30-35. p. 137,11.17-21. 43* FABLE OE MANORS. Ancient Name of Modem Name of In what Hundred, City, or Burg'll, (Ancient Name). Name of Tenants in Chief. Tenant, X. R. E. Under Tenants and other P ersoiis or Depen- Reference to Extol sion and Translation. dcncies mentioned. Extension. | Translation. Litelcert . Little Chart . Calelielle Arcbbp. of Canterbury. The Archbishop’s Monks . . . . William, tenant of the Archbishop p. 18,11. 42-50. p. 107,11. 38-45. Litelbroteham . Little W rot- ham Medestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . Goduin and Lduin, as 2 manors Ralph Fitz-Turald. Richard de Tonebrige The King to the value of 16<2. p. 33,11. 41^18. p. 122,1.44, to p. 123,1. 6. TjOISNES . . . LESNES,ftZ.Eritli Litelai . . . Bishop of Baieux Azor. p. 113,11.12-17. Lolingestone . Lullingstone . Acliestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . Brixe Cilt, in chief .. . Goisfrid de Ros. The King has in his own hands land worth 10s. p. 22,11. 46-50. p. 111,11.40-44. LOLINGSTONE Lullingstone . Acbestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . Bruning, in chief Malgerius. The King has to the value of 10s. p. 23,11.1-5. p. 112,11.1-4. Lolingston . . Lullingstone . Acliestan . . Bishop of Baieux Seuuart Sot, and could change with his land at pleasure Osbern Pastforeire The King has wood as the Bishop a new gift of p. 23,11.15-21. p. 112,11.12-17. Machehevet . Make made, in Preston, next Faversham Favreshant . Bishop ot Baieux . . Seuuold. Ansfrid. p. 39,11. 8-10. p. 129,11. 3-5. Mapledescam . Maplescombe . Acliestan Bishop of Baieux . . hlustan, in chief . . . p. 22, 11. 26-30. p. 111,11.23-26. Maplescamp Maplescombe . Acliestan . . Bishop of Baieux Wadard. Vltan held it under Harold p. 23, 11. 29-32. p. 112,11. 24-27. Maresous de Romenel Romney Marsh, \ a snling in. Lantport . . Bishop of Baieux . . Rotbert de Romenel . p. 41, 11.49, 50. p. 131,11. 8, 9. Marescus de Romenel Romney Marsh, i a suling in, Lantport . . Bishop of Baieux . . Six Sockmen .... Rotbert de Romenel . p. 42, 11. 2-5. p. 131,11.14-17. Marourdk . . Mereworth Litefel . . Haimo the Sheriff . . .Norman, in chief . . p. 55, 11. 30-35. p. 146,11. 34—39. Massebekgf, . . Marshborough, in Woodnes- borough, 1 yoke and 10 acres in, Bummerdene '( surely Bstrei Bishop of Baieux . . Goduin, in chief . . . Osbert. p. 44, 11. 34, 35. p. 135,11.17,18. Meddestane Maidstone . . Meddestan . . Archbishop of Canter¬ bury Three Knights The Monies of Canterbury p. 11, 11. 36-19. p. 100, 1. 40, to p. 101,1. 4. Meleston . . Milton, next Gravesend, ? for Parrock Lssamle . . . Bishop ol Baieux . . V luuard, in chief Helto. p. 34, 11.47-50. p. 124,11.10-12. Meletune . Milton, next Gravesend Tollentreu . . Bishop of Baieux . . Lari Leuuin .... Ralph Litz-Turoid Richard de Tonebrige p. 28,11. 1-6. p. 117, 11. 2-6. Mellingetks . West Malling . Lot named, for it cannot be Bromlei Bishop of Rochester p. 109, 1. 32. Mepeham . . Meopham . . Tolientrev . . Archbishop of Canter¬ bury The Archbishop’s Monks .... Richard de Tonebrige p. 17, 11. 25-30. p. 106,11.18-24. Merlea . . . MARLEY,UlHAR- RIETSHAM, but held of Bewley Manor, in Haugliton Malherb Aihorde . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Turgis, in chief . . . A Tenant (homo) Adam p. 30, 1. 24. p. 119,11.24-27. Merseham . . Mersham . . Lingebrige . Archbishop of Canter¬ bury, in demesne p. 102,1. 40. Metlinges . . Last Malling . Laurochesfel . Archbishop of Canter¬ bury, in demesne p. 11,1. 6. p. 100,1. 12. Middei.tqne Milton . . . Middeltun . . King William. . . . King Ldward.... The Men of the Weald Haimo the Sheriff Hugh de Port Wadard Alnold Cild Abbot of St. Augustine p. 8, 1. 43, to p. 9,1. 17. p. 98, 1. 34, to p. 99,1. 4. Midelea . . . Midley? {Has- ted) Lstrei ? Bishop ol Baieux . . Godric, in chief . . . Alured. p. 44, 11.17 21. p. 134, 1. 43, to p. 135,1. 3. Monocstunb Monkton . . Tanet . . . Archbp. of Canterbury The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 17,1. 47. p. 106,11.42—46. Mdndingeham . Little Monge- ham Cornelest . . Abbey ot St. Augustine, Themselves Wadard, part . . . p. 48, 11. 27 34. p. 139,11.24-32. Nedestede . . Nettlestead . Tviferde. . . Bishop of Baieux Norman, in chief . . Haimo. 2 Haughs p. 33,11. 3-8. p. 122,11. 7-11. Neventone . . Newington, 1 suling laid into Bevsberge . . Bishop ol Baieux Hugh de Montfort p. 44, 11. 2-4. p. 134,11.29-31. Neventone . . Newington, near Hythe Bevsberge . . Hugh de Montfort . . Ederic, in chief . . . p. 53, 11. 7-12. p. 144,11.12-16. Newedene . . Newenden . . Selebrist . . Arch bp. of Canterbury p. 103, 1. 36. Nkwetone . . Newington, near Sitting- borne Mildetone . . Albert the Chaplain. . Sidgar hold ol Queen Eddid (alias Editha, wife of the Confessor) 4 Haughs in Canterbury .... 2 Haughs in Rochester Mildetone Manor Archbishop of Canterbury Bishop of Baieux Goisfrid de Ros Adam Fitz-Hubert p. 56, 11. 1 24. p. 147, 11.1-23. Norborne . . 44* Northborne Cornelest . . Abbey of St. Augustine, Themselves Oidelard. Eislebert Wadard Odelin Marcherius Osbert Fitz-Letard Ranulph de Columbers Ranulph de Yalbadou The Villan’s lands p. 139, 1. 4-21. TABLE OE MANORS. Ancient Name of Place. Modern Name of Place. In what Hundred, City, or Burgh, Name of Tenant in Chief. Tenant, T. R. E. Under Tenants and other Persons or Depen- Reference to Extcns on and Translation. (Ancient Name). deneies mentioned. Extension. Translation. Nordeslinge . Easling . . . Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux Turgod. p. 129,11. 36-39. Nordeodb . . Little .Barton . Cantuana Archbishop of Canter- The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 18, 11. 9-14. p. 107,11. 5-9. Norflvet . . Northfleet Tollentreuv. . bury Archbishop of Canter- 97 Burgesses in Canterbury p. 106,11.17-23. Roculf . . . bury, in demesne Nortone . . . Norton . . . Arclibisbop of Canter- p. 101,11.21-30. bury, in demesne The Archdeacon of Canterbury Norton® . . . Norton, near Favreshant . . Bishop ot Baieux . . Osuuard, in chief . . Hugh de Porth. p. 38, 11. 19-24. p. 128,11. 14-18. Faversham Notestede . . Norsted, alias Toilentrev . Bishop of Baieux . . Ylstan, in chief . . . Wadard. p. 28, 11. 21-24. p. 117,11.19-22. Ndtsted Obtrepole . . Otterpoole . . Estraites . . Hugh de Montfort . . Alrebot, in chief . . p. 54,11. 3-7. p. 145,11.15-18. Ofeham . . . Offham . . . Laurochesfel . Bishop ot Baieux . . Godric, in chief . . . p. 27, 11. 26-30. p. 116,11.23-26. Ofeham . . . Offham . . . Laurochestel Bishop of Baieux . . Alnod Gilt, and Vluric Anschitil. p. 28, 11. 25-32. p. 117,11. 24-29. Westerham . . Oistreham . . held of him A house in Rochester Richard de Tonebrige OlSTREHAM . . Earl Eustace .... Earl Goduin, in chief . p. 54, 11. 28-33. p. 145,11. 39—13. WOULD HAM . . Not named . . Bishop of Rochester p. 109,1. 28. Olecu.mbe . . Ulcomb . •. Achestan, or (?) Archbp. of Canterbury. Earl of Ow, one of the Archbishop’s p. 15, 11. 30-35. p. 104,11.19-23. Haiborne . . Knights Alfer formerly held it of the Arch- bishop Ore .... Ore .... Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux . . Turgis, in chief . . . Adam. p. 38,11.10-14. p. 128,11. 5-9. Ore (i jugum in) Ore, 1 yoke in Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux . . Leuuold, in chief . . Adam. p. 39, 11. 36-39. p. 129,11.29-31. Orlavestone, iij Orlestone, 3 Hame . . . Hugh de Montfort . . 11 Sochmen .... William. p. 52,11. 19-23. p. 143,11. 22-25. juga et dixnidia yokes and ^ a virga in virge in Orpinton . . Orpington . . Achestan Arch bp. ot Canterbury. Malgerius, one of the Archbishop’s p. 15,1.17. p. 104,1. 8. knights Oupintun . . Orpington . . Helmestrei . . The Archbishop’s Monks . . . p. 17,1.1. p. 105,1. 35. OsPRINGES . . Ospringe . . Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux . . Hugh, nephew of Herbert .... Herbert Richard de Maris Turstin 1 Messuage in Canterbury p. 38,11. 34-45. p. 10,11.23-32. p. 128,11.27-36. p. 99,11. 30-39. Otefort . . Otford . . . Achestan . . Archbp. ot Canterbury, in demesne Three Thanes Richard de Tonebrige Otham . . . Aihorde . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Aluuin, in chief . . . Goisfrid de Ros. p. 31,11.21-25. p. 120.11.18-22. Otringeberge . Wateringbury . Tviferde. . . Bishop of Baieux . . Leueua, in chief . . . Ralph Fitz-Turald. 4 Haughs in the City (Rochester) p. 33,11. 9-14. p. 33,11.15-19. p. 122,11.12-16. p. 122,11.17-20. Wateringbury . Tviferde. . . Bishop of Baieux Godil, in chief . . . Hugh de Braiboue. Otringedene . Otterden . . Aihorde . . Bishop of Baieux . . Aluuard, in chief Adam Fitz-Hubert. 2 Messuages of Land in Canterbury p. 30,11. 33-38. p. 119,11.33-37. p. 131,11.29-32. Palestrei . . PALSTERjin Wit- Oxenai . . . Bishop of Baieux Eduin Fresbyter, in Osbem Paisforer. p. 41,11. 27-30. tersham chief p. 17,11.9-18. p. 105,1.42, to Pecheham . . Fast Peckham . Litefelle . . . Arch bp. of Canterbury. The Archbishop’s Monks .... An Archbishop’s Man Richard de Tonebrige p. 106,1. 9. West Peckham Litefelle . . Bishop of Baieux . . Earl Leuuin .... Corbin. p. 117,11.42^6. The King has 3 denns p. 29,1.1. Paddlesworth . Laurochesfel Bishop of Baieux . . Godric, in chief . . . Hugh de Port. p. 27,11.14-19. p. 116,11.13-17. Perie . . . Perry OouRT,in Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux . . Wlui. Ansfrid. p. 129,11.13-15. Preston, next p. 39,11. 21-24. p. 129,11.16-18. Perie . . . It is impossible to say which of the two is Perry Favreshant . . Bishop of Baieux . . Vlueua, in chief . . . Ansfrid. . Court, perhaps both, now in Pesinges and one (Seep. 3) Pising, in East Beusberge . . Bishop of Baieux . . Lefstan, -)1n chief, and Hugh de Porth. p. 131,11. 35-39. Piham Langdon Leuuin, could go, Eluret, /with their Sired, and lands, where Pesinges PlNNEDENE . . Pinden . . . Achestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . 2 others J they chose Aluret, and could change at his pleasure Godric, in chief . . . Malgerius. p 23,11.11-14. p. 112,11. 9-11. p. 121,11.37-40. Adam. p. 41,11. 14-16. p 12,11.32-42. PlSTINGES . . PlTEHAM . . ? in Pluckley . Petham . . . Caleheve . . Piteham . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Archbp. of Canterbury. Ralph de Curbespine. Godfrey and Nigell The Monks p. 131,11.15-17. p. 101,11.31-38. PlVENTONE . . Peyington . . Caleheve . . Bishop of Baieux . . Sbern Biga, in chief . Ralph de Curbespine. p. 41,11. 9-13. p. 131,11.10-14. Platenovt . . Bevsberg . . Abbey of St. Augustine, Ralph de Curbespine, a part . . . p. 48,11.43-48. p. 139,11.38—42. p. 102,1. 23. Plughelei . . Pluckley . . Cale Helle . . Archbp. of Canterbury, Plumestede Plumstede . . Plumstead . . Plumstead . . Litelai . . . Litelai . . . in demesne Bishop of Baieux . . Abbey of St. Augustine, Themselves Hugh de Montfort . . Brixi Cilt, in chief . • Abbot of St. Augustine. p. 24,11. 27-33. p. 113,11.22-26. p. 136,11. 39—43. POLTONE . . POLTON . . . Bevsberge . . Vluuin, in chief . . • Herfrid. p. 53,11.19-21. p. 144,11.23-25. 45* TABLE OF MANORS. Ancient. Name of Modern Name of In what Hundred, City, or Burgh, Name of Tenant in Chief. Tenant, T. R. E. Under Tenants and other Persons or Depen- Reference to Ex ten ion and Translation. Extension. Translation. POPESELL . . POPESHALL, in Estre .... Bisbop of Baieux . . Two Freemen, in chief . Osbem Fitz-Letard. p. 37,11. 27-31. p. 127,11. 13-17. Coldred A Knight of his POPESSALE . . Popes gall, in Beusberge . . Bishop of Baieux . . Vluric, in chief . . . Ralph de Curbespine. p. 37,11. 32-34. p. 127,11.19-20. POSTINGES . . PoSTLING . . Hen ... . Hugh de Montfort . . Sbern Biga .... Rogerius . Ralph de Curbespine p. 51,11.14-21. p. 142,11.16-22. Prestetone . . Preston . . Favreskant . Archbp. of Canterbury . The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 18,1.21. p. 107,1. 15. Prestetune Preston . . Prestetun . Abbey of St. Augustine, Vitalis. p. 140, 11.1-7. Themselves p. 49,1. 4. Rapentone . Repton in Ash- Cert .... Abbey of St. Augustine Ansered . p. 47, 11. 46-50. p. 138,11. 37-41. Redlege . . . Ridley . . . Ackestan . . Bishop of Baieux . . Siuuard, in chief . . Adam Fitz-Hubert. Richard de Tonebrige p. 22, 11. 31-35. p. 111,11.27-30. Riesce . . . Ryarsh . . . Eaurockesfel Bishop of Baieux . . Aluric, in chief . . Hugh de Port. p. 27,11. 20-25. p. 116,11.18-22. Ringetone . . Ringletone in Estrei . . Fee of Bishop of Baieux, Eduuard, in chief . . Herbert, at farm of the King . . . p. 42, 11.17-22. p. 131,11. 32-36. W OODNES- now the King BOROUGH Rochelei . . Rcxley . . . Helmestrei . . Bishop of Baieux Aluuard, in chief . . Malgerius. p. 113,11.28-31. Rockinges, di- Rucking, i a Hamo . . . Hugh de Montfort . . Leuret, in chief . . . Ralph Fitz-Rickard. p. 52, 11. 24-28. p. 143,11.26-29. midium solin in, suling in. Roculf . . . Reculver . . Roculf . . . Arch bp. of Canterbury. p. 101, 1. 14. Romenel unum 1 yoke in Rom- Newcerce . Hugh de Montfort . . 2 Socmen and 2 V illans p. 50, 11. 30-34. p. 141,11. 29-31. jugum in Ma- NEY MARSH RESCO DE Romenel unnm Une suling, less W erde . . . Hugo de Montfort . . 14 Socmen. p. 51,11. 5-7. p. 142,11. 7-9. solin, dimidia one virge, in virga minus, in Maresco DE Romney Marsh Romenel j ju- One yoke in Werde . . . Hugh de Montfort . . 2 Socmen. Rogerius. p. 51,11. 8-10. p. 142,11.10-12. gum in Ma- Romney Marsh RESCO DE Romenel sexta Tlie 6tli part of Werde . . . Hugh de Montfort . . 1 Socman. Rotbert. p. 142,11.13-14. parsunius jug'i 1 yoke, in Rom- in Maresco de ney Marsh Romenel dimi- £ suling, in Rom- Newcerce . Hugh de Montfort . . 12 Socmen .... 12 Socmen. p. 51, 11. 34—36. p. 142,11.34,35. dium solin, in Maresch de ney Marsh Romenel 1 1 yoke, in Rom- Adelovesbrige . Hugh de Montfort . . 12 Socmen. p. 51, 11. 37-40. p. 142,11.37-40. jugum in Ma- ney Marsh resch de Rongostone . . Ringelstone in ? Hollingbourn Favreshant . . Bisbop of Baieux . . Vluiet, in chief . Richard. p. 130,11.18-20. (Hasted) Rotinge . . . Rotinq in Ualekeve . . Abbey of St. Augustine, In Demesne. p. 47, 11.43-45. p. 138,11.34-35. Pluckley Themselves Salteode . . Saltwood . . Hen .... Archbishop of Canter- Hugh de Montfort (one of the Arch- p. 16,11.17-24. p. 105,11.12-18. bury bishop’s Knights) 225 Burgesses in Hytlie Sancta Marga- St. Margaret’s Beusberg Bishop of Baieux, appa- Sired, the father, one Sired, son of Sired, one suling in, as p. 4, 11. 33-48, p. 94,11. 38-47, RITA rently, or else merely suling in, as a prebend a prebend. and p. 5, 11. and p. 95, 11. 1 Custos Alric, one suling in, as Ralph, one suling in, as a prebend 1-10. to 14. a prebend Aired, one suling in, as a prebend The father ol Aired, one Robert Niger, one suling in, as a suling in, as a prebend prebend Esmellt, Chaplain of Walter, one suling in, as a prebend King Edward, one su- Turbatus, half a suling in, as a pre- ling m bend Sigar, one suling in, as Eduuin, halt a suling and 25 acres. a prebend and 85 acres in Cornilo hundred, as Golstan, half a suling a prebend in, as a prebend Alan, Clerk of the Bishop of Baieux, Eduuin, hall a suling, 8 acres etc., as a prebend V luric de Oxenford, 8 acres Sancta Marga- St. Margaret’s Beusberg . . Bp. of Baieux, apparent- Spirites, one yoke and Nigell, the physician, one yoke and a p. 5, 11. 33-36. p. 95, 11. 39-41. RITA ly, or else merely Custos a half in, as a prebend half in, as a prebend Sancti Martini Yille op St. Estursete . . Archbishop of Canter- p. 103,11. 6-8. VILLA . . . Martin bury 7 Burgesses in Canterbury Ralph Sandwice . . Sandwich . . Hundredum de Archbishop ol Canter- King Edward.... The Monks of the Holy Trinity . . p. 10,11. 5-14, p. 99, 11. 16-22, Sandwice bury and p. 19,1.47. and p.108,1.43. Scape . . . ? Sheppey . . Therham ? for Archbishop of Canter- Godfrey Dapifer (one of the Arch¬ bishop’s Knights) p. 16,1. 7. p. 104,1. 44. Tenham bury Sedlinges . . Sellindge . . Estraites . . Hugh de Montfort . . Usuuard, in chief Heruey. p. 52,11. 1-7. p. 143,11. 7-11. Seivetone . . Sevington (L. Langebrige Hugh de Montfort . . Bresibait, in chief . Maigno. p. 50,11.11-15. p. 141,11.11-14. Selesbdrne . . partof Harriet- Aihorde . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Earl Goduin, and Aluuin Hugh, nephew of Herbert .... p. 29, U. 23-25. p. 118,11.22-24. sham ? held of him Selinge . . . W OODNES- Estre.... Bishop of Baieux . . Aluuin. Osbem Fitz-Letard. p. 37, 11. 24-26. p. 127,11.10-12. BOROUGH alias Shelving Selinges . . V Shelving alias Estrei . . . Bishop of Baieux . . V luuic, in chief . . . Ralph de Columbers. p. 45,11. 5-9. p. 135,11. 36-39. Woodnesbo- rough ? Shelv¬ ing in Barham 46 * TABLE 01' MANORS. In what Hundred, Name of Tenant in Chief. Tenant, T. R. E. Reference to Extension and Translation. Place. Pluce. (Ancient Name). deneics mentioned. Extension. Translation. Tewa . . . Newcerce . . Hugh de Montfort . . Azor Rot, in chief . p. 51,11. 30-33. p. 142,11.31-33. Ticheteste . . Tickenhurst, in Northborne Summerdene ? butsurelyEstrei Bishop of Baieux . . Edric de Alham, in chief p. 135,11. 8-11. Tilsmanestone . Txlmanstone . Lamport Arclibp. of Canterbury. William Folet (one of the Archbp.’s p. 16,1.3y. p. 105,1. 32. Tintentone . . Tinton, in Ware- Blacheburne . Hugh de Montfort . . Ylnod, in chief . . . p. 51,11. 42-48. p. 142,1.42, to p. 143,1.3. Titf.ntone . . \ a denne of Tinton, in Adilovtesbrige Bishop of Baieux . . Rotbert de Romenel. Hugh de Montfort, Lord of Titentone p. 42,11. 13—10. p. 131,11.27-30. Titentone, dimi- 1 diumjugumixi raaresco, ap- preciatum in | a yoke in the Marsh, tilled with the de¬ mesne ploughs of Tinton-in- Warehorne, and therefore appraised in Tinton Newcerce . . Hugh de Montfort . . 1 Socman .... p. 50, 11. 34—35. p. 141,11.32-34. Tivedele . . Tudeley . . W achelestan . Bishop of Baieux . . Eddeua, in chief . . Richard de Tonebrige. p. 118,11. 9-11. Totesolive . . Trottisclifke . Not named, for it cannot be Bishop of Rochester p. 109,1. 36. Totintone . . Tottington . . Laurochesfel . The King, as of new gift of Bishop of Baieux Vlnod, in chief . . . Rotbert Latin, at farm of the King . p. 27,11. 36-41. p. 116,11. 31-35. Totintune . . Tottington, 1 yoke in Laurochesfel . The King, as of new gift of the Bishop Goduin, in chief . . . Rotbert Latin, at farm of the King . p. 27, 11.42—44. p. 116,11.36-38. Trevelai . . Throwley . . Eavreshant . . Bishop of Baieux . . Vlnod, in chief . . . Herfrid. iij Haughs in Canterbury Herbert Fitz-Ivo (?) p. 39,11. 40-45. p. 39, 1. 50. p. 129,11. 32-35. Tunstall . . Mildetone . . Bishop of Baieux . . Osuuard, in chief Hugh de Port. p. 35,11.1-5. p. 124,11.14-17. Turneham . . Thhrnham . . Aihorde . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Sbern Biga. in chief . . Ralph Curbespine . p. 31,11. 38-43. p. 120,11. 33-37. Walwalesere . Waldershare . Estrei . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Wluuard, in chief . . Ralph de Curbespine. Robert p. 44,11.40-44. Wanesberge . W00DNESB0- rough, 1 yoke in Summerdene (?) but surely Estrei Bishop of Baieux Tochi, in chief . . . Turstin. p. 44,1. 30, 31. p. 135,11.12-13. Warwintone . Garwinton, in Littlebourne JJunamesforb . Abbey of St. Augustine Sbern Biga, and Edric held of him Bishop of Baieux gave it him in ex¬ change for his park Ralph The Archbishop’s Monks .... The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 46,11. 36-40. p. 137,11. 22-26. Welle . . . Westwell . . Calehelle . . Archbp. of Canterbury. p. 19,1. 1. p. 108,1.1. Werahorne Warehorne Hame . . . Archbp. of Canterbury. p. 19, 1. 28. p. 108,1. 25. Wesclivb . . Westcliffe. . Bevsberg . . Bishop of Baieux . . Edric, in chief . . . Hugh. Hugh de Montfort p. 42,11. 33-37. p. 133,11.1-4. West Selve West Shelve, in Lenham Aihorde . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Eddid, in chief . . . William Fitz-Robert. A certain Frenchman (Francigena) A house in Canterbury p. 30,11. 43-50. p. 119,11.42-47. Wi . . . . Wye . . Not named . . Battle Abbey . . . Ralph de Curbespine. Socmen Adelulf Hugh de Montfort p. 45, 11. 37-45. p. 136,11.22-36. WlCHEHAM . . West Wickham Helmestrei . . Bishop of Baieux . . Godric Eitz-Carle, in chief Adam Eitz-Hubert. p. 24,1. 50, to p. 25,1. 4. p. 113,11.41-45. WlCHEHAM . . WICKHAMBREAUX Uonamesford . Bishop of Baieux in demesne Alured Biga, in chief . Sired held 4 a suling of him A Presbyter who gives 40s. per ann. 3 Messuages in Canterbury Goisfrid, son of Mala Terra p. 35,1. 43, to p. 36,1. 2. p. 125,11.16-26. WlNCHELESMERF WlCHLING . . Aihorde . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Vluiet, in chief, and could go where he chose Hugo, nephew of Herbert .... p. 31,11.11-16. p. 120,11. 9-13. WlNGEHAM . . WlNGHAM . . Wingeham . Archbp. of Canterbury, in demesne William de Acris. In Fletes. 5 of the Archbishop’s men p. 13,11. 35-44. p. 102,11.29-38. WlRENTONE . . Wilrinton, at. Wilderton-in- Throwley {L.B.L.) Eavreshant . . Abbey of St. Augustine, Themselves p. 47,11. 30-33. p. 138,11.18-21. WlTENEMERS Wricklesmarsh, in Charlton Grenviz . . . Bishop of Baieux . . Anschil, in chief. . . Eitz-Turald de Rouecestre .... p. 25, 11. 34-38. p. 114,11.31-35. “ A Manor’' Brooke (?) . . Wi. Archbp. of Canterbury The Archbishop’s Monks .... p. 19, 1. 38. p. 108,1. 36. i jugum in eodem hundredo i yoke in Whit- stable hundred Witenestaple . Bishop of Baieux . Vlsi, in chief . . . . Vitalis. p. 38,11. 6-8. p. 127, 1. 42, to p. 128,1. 3. Bishop of Baieux ■ Osbern Paisforer, 12 acres .... p.41,1. 32. p. 131,1. 34. Adilovtesbrige Bishop of Baieux • Two Sockmen . . . Rotbert de Romenel, £ a yoke . . A Widow p. 42,11.10-12. p. 131,11.24-26. i yoke and a half in Estrei Bishop of Baieux . Ernold, in chief . Osbern . p. 43,11. 51-54. p. 134,11.25-27. 6 acres, etc. in ? Summerdene ? Bishop of Baieux, ? now Richard Fitz-Gislebert, in King’s hands Rotbert Latin. Richard, son of Earl Gislebert p. 135,11. 5-7. Unum Mane- A Manor . . Estrei . . . Bishop of Baieux . . 3 Freemen, in chief Osbern . p. 45,11.1-4. p. 135,11.33-35. UUUl Bevsberge . . Bishop of Baieux . . Molleue, in chief. . . Ralph de Curbespine. p. 45,11.17-19. p. 136,11. 4-5. iij virgas . . 48* 3 virgates . . Estrei . . . Abbey of St. Augustine, Themselves p. 49,11.13 15. p. 140,11.14-16. TABLE OE MANORS. Wnm „ „f In wliat Hundred, Place. Place. City, or Burgh, (Ancient Name). Name of Tenant in Chief. Tenants, T. E. E. Under Tenants and other Persons and Dcpen- Ileterenco to Extension and Translation. r i 1 T Dimidium ju- gumet diraidia i a yoke and J a verge (in Werde . . --- | 11.0. ala u. Hugh de Montfort . . Adelelm, in chief Bertrann. p. 50, 11. 47, 48 p. 142,11. 1, 2. virga (in Est- brige ?) Eastbrige ?) Dimidium solin (?in Post- £ a suling (?in Postlino) Hen . . . Hugh de Montfort . . Aldred Bot, in chief . linge) Dimidium ju- gum (? in Tin- £ a yoke (Fin Tinton, inVARE- Blaclieburne . Hugh de Montfort . . 5 Socmen . 5 Socmen .... p. 143,11. 4, 5. tentone) HORNE) Tres virgas et dimidia in Li- Stotinges . . Hugh de Montfort . . 3 Socmen, in chief . p. 143,11.18,19. howart Lath j jig 11111 (? m Estraites) 1 yoke (in Street ?) Estraites . . Hugh do Montfort . j Socman, in chief . . Ansfrid. p. 143,11.40-43. j jugom ( ? m Estraites) 1 yoke (in Street ?) Estraites . . Hugh de Montfort . 1 Socman . . . Robert Cook. p. 52, 11. 43-45. p. 143,11.44-46. ljugnm? . . xvj aerie (in Neventone ?) 1 yoke ? where 16 acres (in Newington ?) Lange brige Bevsberge . . Hugh de Montfort . . Hugh de Montfort . . 1 Socman, in chief . 1 Socman, in chief . . Gislebert. 1 Socman .... p. 52, 11. 46-48. p. 144,11. 1,2. p. 144,11.17,18. Una parsJAONEi nec ad ullum manerium j acuit ApieceofBitooM- land belonging to no manor Bevsberge . . Hugh de Montfort . . The King’s demesne . Aluuinus presbyter held p. 144,11.19-21. Unum molinum 1 virga . . . Unum jugum, et in Aia vij A mill . . . 1 virgate . . 1 yoke, and in Aia 7 acres Bevsberge . . Certh.... Estraites, but ? Hugh de Montfort . . Hugh de Montfort . . Hugh de Montfort . . i Socman. 1 Socman. Fulbert. A certain Woman. Sligell. p. 53,1. 18. p. 53,11. 30, 31. p. 53,11.44-47. p. 144,1. 22. p. 144,11.33,34. 1.145, 11. 7-10. | Dimidium solin j virga minus A suling less 1 virge Blacbeburae et Nevcerce ? Hugh de Montfort . . 6 Socmen, in chief . . Jerald ?. c. 54,11. 9-12. p. 145,11.20-23. UnumManerium Wit ... . Haimo the Sheriff . . p. 55,11.17-24. p. 146,11.22-28. J 49 * NAMES OF PLACES, ANCIENT AND MODERN. Aerise—Acres. Addington—Eddintune. Aldglose, in Hastingleigh—Aldelose. Aldington, next Thurnliam —Audinton. Allington—Elentun. Aloesbridge Hundred—Adilovtesbrige. Apulton, in YVnldenshaw—Apletone. Ash, near Sandwich—Ece. Ashford—Estefort. Another Ashford—alia Essetesford. Badlesmere—Badlesmere. Barfrestone—Berfrestone. Barham—Berliain. Barming, East—Bermelinge. Banning, West, alias Barnjet—Ber- melie. Barnjet, alias West Banning—Ber- melie. Beaiuonston, or Beamston-in-West- well—Betmontestun. Beecles in Bekele, alias Chalk—Bi- chelei. Beckenham—Bacheham. ?—Bedesham. Bekele, alias Beccles, in Chalk—Bi- chelei. Bekesborue—Burnes. Benenden—Benindene. Benstede, in Hnnton—Benedestede. Bewley, in Boughton Malherb—Bo- Betvsfield, alias Whitfield—Bevesfd. Bilclierst, in Hawking (A. B. L .)—Be- lice. Bilsington—Bilsvitone. Bircholt—Belice. Bireholt (Hasted) —Belice. Billing—Berlinge. Blackmanstone—Blachemenestone. Bleane—Blehem. Bonnington—Bonintone. Bottshara, in Elmsted—Bodesham. Boughton Aluph—Boltune. Boughton Monchensei—Boltone. Boxley—Boseleu. B raborne—Bradeburne. Braborne—Breburne. Brandred, in Aerise—Brand. Brooke—?“A manor in the hundred of Wi.” Broomfield—Brunfelle. Broomground—Jaoneum. Buckland—Bocheland. Buckland, near Dover—Bocheland. Burham—Borliam. Burmarsh—Burvvar Maresc. Chalk—Celca. Charlton, near Dover—Carlentone. Chart Sutton—Certh. Chatham—Ceteham. Chilham—Cilehain. Chillenden—Cilledeu. Chislet— Cistelet. Cliff—Olive. Coldred—Colret. Combe-in-Brabourne—Cumbe. Cowling—Colinge. Cowling—Colinges. Cravvtou, alias Crofton, in Orpington— Croctuue. Cudham—Codeham. Deal—Addelan. Dean Court, in Westwell—Dene. Deice, Little, alias Upper Deice—Deice. Deice, Great, with Lower Deice—Deice. Denton—Danetone. Derrington, in Barham (L. B. L), but this is in Bridge hundred, not Wye— Darenden. Ditton—Dictune. Doddington—Dodeham. Dover—Douere. Easling—Nordeslinge, also Eslinges. Eastbridge—Estbrige. Eastchurch ?—Cerce. East Sutton—Sudtone. Eastvvell, but ? Wells, in Eastry— Essewelle. Eccles, in Aylesford—Aiglessa. Elham—Alhara. Elmington, in Eythorne—Esmetone. Elmstone—ASlvetone. Elnothington, in Holliugbourne—Al- noitone. Elwerton, in Stone, next Eaversham— Ernoltun. Eshmerfield, alias Ashenfield, in Wal¬ tham (Hasted), but that is in Bridge hundred, not Wye (L. B. L.) —Es- merefel. Evegate, or Thevegate, in Smeetli—• Tevegate. Ewell (Hasted) —Etwelle. Ewell—Ewelle. Panues, or Yannes, in Crundal— Pane. Parborn, East, part of Harrietsham— Fereburne. Parborn, West, in Harrietsham—Fere¬ burne. Parleigh, West—Ferlaga. Parthingloe, alias Yenson Dane, in Hougham—Ferlingelai. Folkestone—Pulchestau. Pordwicli—Forewic. Prinstead—Predenestede. Garwinton, in Littlebourne—Warwin- ton. G illi ngham— Gelingeham. Goldwell, in Great Chart, but?— Godeselle, but? Gravesend— Gravesham. Greenwich—Greenviz. Guston—Goristone. Hackiugton, alias St. Stephens—La- tintoue. Hadlow—Ilaslow. Ham—Hama. Hamwolde, in Woodnesborough—Hai- molde, alias Aimolde. Harbilton, in Harrietsham—Herbre- titov. Hardres, Upper—Hardes. Hardies, Lower and Nether—Hardes. Harrietsham—Hariardesham, Fere¬ burne, and Selesburne. Hartanger, in Barfrestone—Hertange. Hartley—Arclei. Hastingleigh—Hastingelai. Hastingligh—Hastingelie. llaydon, alias The Mount, in Cobham —Hadone. Henhurst in Cobham—Handiest. ? Herste Hall in Herst, in Murston Parish, but outlying and surrounded by Luddenham—Herste. Ileyton in Stamford (L. B. L .)— Haintone (L. B. L.) Higham—Hecham. Hoo, St. Warburgh—Hov. Horton, in Chartham—Hortone. Hougham — Huham, alias Hucliam Berewicka, in Berham. Hougham—Hicham. Kennington—Chenetone. Keston—Chestan. Knowlton—Chenoltone. Langley—Langvelei. Leeds—Esledes. Lenham—Lertham. P—Leueberge. Levbourne—Leleburne. Longport, Borough and Manor in Can¬ terbury—Lanport. Luddenham ?—Cildresham. Luddcsdownc—Ledesduue. Makenade, in Prestou, next Paver- sham—Macliekevet. Malmaynes, in Stoke—Stoches. Marley, in Harrietsham—Merlea. Marsbborough?, in Woodnesborough— Masseberge. Mereworth—Marourde. Midley ?—Midelea. Milton, next Gravesend—Melestun. Milton, next Gravesend—Meletune. Minster, in Thanet—Tanet. M ongeham, Little—Mundingeham. The Mount, alias Haydon, in Cobham —Hadone. Nashenden, in St. Margarets, Roches¬ ter—Essedene. Nettlested—Nedestede. Newington, near Hythe—Neventone. Newington, near Sittingbourne—Newe- tone. N ewington—Neventone. N orthborue—N orborne. Norton, near Faversliam—Nortone. Nursted, alius Nutsted—Notestede. Ofeliam—Offham. Ore—Ore. Orlanstone—Orlavestone. Ospringe—Ospringes. Oth am—Oteham. Otterden—Otringedene. Otterpoole, in Limne—Obtrepole. Paddlesworth, next Snodlaud — Pelle- sorde. Palster, in Witteusliam—Palestrei. Parrock, in Milton, next Gravesend (?) Melestun. Patrixbourne—Borne. Patrixbourne ? Littlebourne—Borne. Peckham, West—Pecheham. Perry Court, in Preston, next Paver- sham—Perie. Another Perry—Perie. Pevington—Piventone. Pimpe-in-Nettlested, and part in West Farleigh—Pinpa. Pinham, in East Langdon—Piham. Pising, in East Langdon—Pesinges. ?—Pistinges. PI umst ed—Plum stede. Polton—Poltone. Popesliall, in Coldred—Popesell and Popesall. Postling—Postinges. Preston—Prestetune. Repton-in-Ashford—Rapentone. Ringlestone, in Holliugbourne—Ron- gostone. Ringletone, in Woodnesborough — ffingetone. Romney—llomenel. Roting-in-Pluckley—Rotinge. Rucking —Roehinges. Ryarsh—Riesce. St. Albans, in Nonington.—Eswalt. St. Margarets—Saucta Margarita. St. Stepheus, alias Hackingtou—Latin- tonc. St. Warburgh, Hoo—Hov. Sellindge—Sedlinges. Selling—Setlinges. Seviugton (L. B. L.) —Seivetone. Skalmsford, St., in Chartham—Es- samelesford. Shebbertswell—Sibertesuualt. Shelve, West, in Lenham—West Selve. Shelve, Old, in Lenhain—Est Selve. Shelve, East, alias Shelve Cobham, in Lenham—Estselve. Shelving, alias Woodnesborough, ? Shel¬ ving in Barham—Seliuges. Sibertswould, or Shebbertswell—Si- berteswalt. Sifletone, in Ditton and Aylesford— Sifletone. Soles, in Nonington—Soles. Solton, in Westcliffe—Soltone. Stalisfield—Slanefelle. Stelling—Stellinges. Stockbury—Stoekingebcrge. Stoke, Malmaynes in—Stoches. Stokenbury, in East Peckham—Esto- chingeberge. Street, in Limne—Estraites. Stuppington, in Norton—Stepedone. Sturrey—Esturai. Swalecliffe—Soaneclive. Swanton, in Lidden (Hasted) —Svane- tone. Temple, or Boswell Banks, in Ewell— Broches tele. Teston—Testan. Tkrowley—Trevelai. Thurnham—Turneliam. Tickenhurst, in Northborne—Tich- teste. Tiffenden, in Halden—Tepindene. Tinton, in Warehorne — Titentone and Tintentone. Tonge—Tangas. Tottington, in Aylesford—Totintune. Town Sutton, alias Sutton Valence— Sudtone. Tudeley—Tivedele. TunstaU—Tunestelle. Vanne, or Vannes, in Crundal— Yenson Dane, alias Parthingloe, in Hougham—Ferlingelai. Waldershare—Walwalesere. Wateringbury — Otringebergc and Otringberge. Westcliffe—Wesdive. Westerham—Oistreham. Whitstable—Witenestaple. Wichling—Winchelesmere. Wickhambreaux—Wicheliam. Wilrinton, alias Wilderton, in Throw- ley? (L.B.L.) —Wirentone. Woodnesborough, alias Shelving—Se- linge. Woodnesborough—Wanesberge. Woolwich—Iiulviz. Wrotham, Little—Litelbroteham. Wye—Wi. Yalding—Hallinges. ?—Cherinchelle. ?—Bedenesmere. ?—Etrelone. ?—Aia. ?—Svestone. ?—Borchemerea. ?—Siborne, possibly Siberstone, in Haigham (L. B. L) ?—Essella. ? in Buckland, or Buckland in Wood¬ nesborough—Hamestede. ?—Platenont. ?—Gollesberge. ?—Berchvelle. 50 * NAMES OF PLACES. Aeon, Hospital of St. Thomas of, ii. 215. jEisce, i. e. Ash, q. v. Alkerdin, alias Combe, Manor in Swanscomb, ii. 414. Alteham, i. e. Eltham, i. 459. Anderida, i. 65. Andredcaster, Anderida. Andredsweald Forest, i. 63. Apulderfield, Manor in Cowdham, ii. 68. Ash Parish, near Wrotham, ii. 463. Ash, South, Manor in Ash, ii. 467. Axstane, Hundred of, ii. 343. Aynsford, i. e. Eynsford, q. v. Bacheham, i. e. Beckenham, i. 527. Baford Castle, i. 87. Baldwin’s Manor, in Hartford, ii. 314. Bankers in Lee, i. 473. Bankers, Little, in Lee, ii. 563. Bankwell, in Lee, i. 493. Barkfield, in Southfleet, ii. 423. Barkhart, a seat in Orpington, ii. 101. Barn End, a hamlet in Wilmington, ii. 330, 331. Baston, Manor and Court in Hayes, i. 22, 23, 568. Bayliam Abbey, ii. 75. Bean, Hamlet of, in Stone, ii. 384. Beceeham, i.e. Beckenham, i. 527. Beckenham, i. 527; Appendix, ii. 565, 566. Bedemvell Hamlet, in Erith, ii. 246. Bedeshain, i. e. Betsham, q. v. Begham Abbey, ii. 75. Bekesley, i. e. Bexley, q. v. Belvidere House, in Erith, ii. 248. Bertrey, Manor of, in Cowdham, ii. 72. Betsham, alias Bedesham, Manor in Southfleet, ii. 164, 422. Bexley, Parish, ii. 162. Bickley, in Bromley, i. 551. Bignors Manor, alias Portbridge, in Dartford, ii. 308, 309. Billingham Manor, in Lewisham, i. 515; ii. 564. Bix, i. e. Bexley, q. v. Bixle, i. e. Bexley, q. v. Blackfen Manor, in Bexley, ii. 163. Blackball, in Erith, ii. 247. Blackheath, i. 374. Blackheatli, Chapel on, ii. 565. Bladindon Court, i. e. Blendon, q. v. Blendon Hall, in Bexley, ii. 170. Borstable Manor, ii. 413. Borstall, Manor and Hamlet in Plum- sted, ii. 214. Bostoll, i. e. Borstall, q. v. Bourne Place, in Bexley, ii. 176. Bowton’s Docks, in Woolwich, ii. 560. Bramblebury, in Plumsted, ii. 216. Brampton Manor, in Nockholt, ii. 79. Brampton Hall, in Bexley, ii. 173. Bl asted Green, in Farnborough, ii. 46. Bridgen Place, in Bexley, ii. 172. Brockhall, in Horton, ii. 508. Brockley, in Deptford, i. 356. Brockley, alias Forest Place, in Lewis¬ ham, i. 514. Brockley, Upper, in Deptford, ii. 554. Bromleng—Bromleah and Bromlega, i. e. Bromley, i. 550. Bromley, l. 550. Bromley Parish, Appendix ii. 566. Brook, alias Sutton Place, q. v. Bucklers, in Orpington, ii. 107. Bulbeck Street, in Crayford, ii. 279. Burrish Court, i.e. Burwash Court, q.v. Bunvash Court, in Plumsted, ii. 212. Camden Place, in Chesilhurst, ii. 13. Castle Ruff, near Milton, i. 87. Catford Manor, in Lewisham, i. 513. Ceorletone, i. e. Charlton, i. 420. Chalkside, in Erith, ii. 228. Charles Manor, in Hartford, ii. 309. Charlton, i. 420. Charlton Parish, Appendix ii. 558. Chartons Manor, in Farnino-hara ii 518, 520, 525. Chellesfeld, i. e. Chelsfield, q. v. Chelsfield Parish, ii. 83, and Appen¬ dix 569. Chepsted Manor, in Kingsdown, ii 482. Cherrygarden Farm, at Charlton, ii 401. Chesilhurst Parish, ii. 2; and Appen¬ dix, 568. Chestan, i. e. Keston, q. v. Chimbhams, in Farningham, ii. 521. Chislelmrst, v. Chesilhurst, q. v. Cilesfeld, i. e. Chelsfield, q. v. Cillesfelle, i. e. Chelsfield, q. v. Ciresfel, i. e. Chelsfield, q. v. Ciselhvrst, i. e. Chesilhurst, q. v. Cleyndon Manor, in Darent, ii. 375. Clockhouse, in Darent, ii. 368. Cockleshell Bank, in Stone, ii. 385. Codeham, i. e. Cowdham, q. v. Cokerhurst, in Shoreham, ii. 542. Coldham, i. e. Cowdham, q. v. Combe, East, in Greenwich, Appen¬ dix ii. 557. Combe Manor, in Greenwich, i. 383, 386. Combes, alias Alchardin, Manor, in Swanscombe, ii. 414. Corbye, alias Corbyn Hall, in Eltham. i. 476. Cotton Manor, in Stone, ii. 392, 576. Courthawe, alias Crockerhill, in Eyns- ford, ii. 533. Cowdham Parish, ii. 60. Crai Sud, i. e. St. Mary Cray, q. v. Crauford, Stream of, ii'. 287. Crawton, alias Crofton, in Orpington, q. v. Cray Foots, v. Foot’s Cray, ii. 135. Cray, North, v. North Cray, ii. 141. Cray, Paul’s, v. Paul’s Cray, ii. 125: 130. Cray, St. Mary, v. St. Mary Cray. Cray, South, i. e. St. Mary Cray, q. v. Crayford Parish, ii. 263; and Appen¬ dix, 573. Crecanford, i. 59. Crecanford, i. e. Crayford, q. v. Creccanford, i. e. Crayford, q. v. Crofton Manor, in Orpington, ii. 101, and 569. CrokenhiU Manor, and Hamlet in Eynsford, ii. 532. Cudham, v. Cowdham. Cypenliam, now Sydenham, in Lewis¬ ham, i. 504. Danson Hill, in Bexley, ii. 172. Darent Parish, ii. 367; and Appen¬ dix, 575. Darent, South, Hamlet in Horton, ii. 373, 375, 494. Darenti Vadum, i. e. Dartford, q. v. Darn, i. e. Darent, q. v. Hartford Parish, ii. 286 ; and Appen¬ dix, 574. Dartford, in Wilmington Hundred, ii. 286. Dartford Manor, ii. 3; 345. Dartford Place, ii. 307. Dartford Priory, ii. 303, 308, 316, 336, 358, 415, 532. Daunsingtou, i. e. Danson, q. v. Deadman’s Dock, in Deptford, ii. 554. Deanbottom Hamlet, in Horton, ii. 494. Delight, House of, in Greenwich Park, i. 399. Denton Parish, mentioned, ii. 438. Deorwent, i. e. Darent, q. v. Deptford, i. 340. Deptford Parish, Appendix ii. 553. Dorpentune, i. e. Orpington, q. v. Downe Parish, ii. 54. Downe Court, Manor of, ii. 55. Downe Hall, ii. 56. Draper’s Place, in Erith, ii. 247. Eard, mu Jo Crayford, q. v. East Combe, in Greenwich, i. 386; Appendix, ii. 557. Easthall Manor, in Orpington, ii. 105. Easthorne Manor, in Eltham, i. 470. East Wickham Parish, v. sub Wick¬ ham. Ebbafleet, in Thanet, i. 53, 58, 63. Eglantine Farm, in Farningham ii ^ 519, 520. Eisse, i. e. Ash, q. v. Ellam, in Crayford, ii. 279. Elmsted Wood, in Bromley, i. 557. Eltham, i. 455. Eltham Parish, Appeudix, ii. 561. Eltham Palace, Appendix, ii. 562. Ensford, i. e. Eynsford, q. v. Erclci, i. e. Hartley, q. v. Erhede, modo Crayford, q. v. Erith Parish, alias Leslies, ii. 227 ; and Appendix, 572. Estanes, i. e. Stone, q. v. Euere, i. e. Hever, q. v. Eynsford Parish, ii. 527, and Appen¬ dix, 578. Fachesham, i. e. Fawkhnm, q.v. Fairy hill, in Mottingham, i. 480. Fakeham, i. e. Fawkhnm, q. v. Falkham, i. e. Fawkham, q. v. Pants Manor, in Erith, ii. 253. Farnborough Parish, ii. 46. Farnborough, Duchy Court of, ii. 31.413. Farningham Parish, ii. 510, and Ap¬ pendix, 578. Fawkham Parish, ii. 444. Fearnberga, i. e. Farnborough, q. v. Ferlingeham, i. e. Farningham, q. r. Ferningeham, i.e. Farningham, q.v. Flamsteed House, in Greenwich Park i. 401. Fleotis, i. e. Southfleet, q. v. Fletis, i. e. Southfleet, q. v. Foots Cray Parish, ii. 135, and Ap¬ pendix, 570. Foots Cray Place, ii. 138. Forest Place, alias Brockley, in Lewis¬ ham, i. 514. Foxgrove Manor, in Beckenham, i. 536. Franks, in Horton, ii. 500. Freelands, in Bromley, ii. 567. Fremingham, i.e. Farningham, q.v. Frendsbury, i. e. Frindsbury, q. v. Freningham, i.e. Farningham, q.v. Frindsbury (Frendsbury), cited ii. 427, 438. Froguall, in Chiselhurst. ii. 10. Fulham’s Place, in Plumsted, ii. 15, 217. Gilden Hill, i. e. Gilton Hill, q. v. Gills, Hamlet in Darent, ii. 373, 375, 381, and 576. Gilton Hill, in Sutton, ii. 358. Goddingtou Manor, in Chelsfield, ii. 89.413. Gore, a seat in Darent, ii. 369. Grandisons, alias 'Wilmington Manor, in Wilmington, ii. 332. Greenstreet Green, Hamlet in Chels¬ field, ii. 84, 569. Greenstreet Green, Hamlet in Darent, ii. 368, 373, 375, 381. Greenstreet Hundred, ii. 485. Grecnhithe Hamlet, in Swanscomb, ii. 400. Greenwich, i. 372. Greenwich, East, i.e. Greenwich, i. 372. Greenwich, West, Manor, alias Sayes Court, q. v. Greenwich Parish, Appendix, 555. Grenawic, i.e. Greenwich, i. 372. Grenovicum, i.e. Greenwich, i. 372. Gretenersce, i. e. Greenhithe, q. v. Hackstaple, in Sutton, ii. 359. llagelei, i. e. Hawley, q. v. Halgel, i. e. Hawley, q. v. Hall Place, in Bexley, ii. 173. Halywell, alias Hodsoll, Manor, in Ash, ii. 467. Halywell Nunnery, in Shoreditch, cited, ii. 467. Hartley Parish, ii. 452, and Appendix, 577. Hatchfield, Great, in Lewisham, i. 515. Hatchfield, Great, in Lee, ii. 563. Haultham, i.e. Eltham, i. 4S5. Hawley Hamlet and Manor, in Sutton, ii. 345, 353. Haw Sawters, alias Sapters, a Manor subordinate to Hawley, in Sutioii, ii. 353. Hayes Parish, ii. 22, and Appendix, 568. Helles St. Margaret, alias St. Mar¬ garet Hills, Chapel of, in Darent., ii. 371, 3S0. Helles St. Margaret, alias St. Mar¬ garet Hills, Hamlet, in Daren!, ii. 373. Helmestrei Hundred, modo Ruxley, ii. 1. Heuleys, in Eltham, i. 470. Herdei, i. e. Hartley, q. v. Hering H01, in Erith, ii. 247. Hermitage, in Deptford, i. 358. Hermitage, in Plumsted, ii. 217. llese, i. q. Hayes, q. v. Hever Manor,' in Kingsdown, ii. 4S0, 490. 1-Iewit’s Farm, in Chelsfield, ii. 91. Hewit’s Manor, in Chelsfield, ii. 90. Higham Parish, Dairy Farm in cited ii. 413. High Elms Farm, in Downe, ii. 54. Highlands Manor, in Sutton, ii. 357. Highstreet House, in Bexley, ii. 167. Ililtesbury Manor, in Evnesford, ii. 533. Illiesnes, i. q. Lesnes, modo Erith, q. v. Hockenden Manor, i. e. St. Mary Cray ii. 119. Hodsoll Street, Hamlet in Ash, ii. 463, 577. Ilollwood House, in Keston, ii.43, 569. Ilolwood House, v. Hollwood. Holly Hill, a seat in Erith, ii. 228. Hoo, Little, alias Hoobery, in Cray¬ ford, ii. 277. Hoobery, alias Little IIoo, in Crayford, ii. 277. Hook Green, Hamlet in Wilmington, ii. 331. Hook Place, in Southfleet, ii. 435. Horuscross Hamlet, in Stone, ii. 384. llorsman’s Place, in Dartford, ii. 311. Hortou Kirby, Parish, ii. 494. Howberry Manor, in Crayford, ii. 277, and 573. Hulviz, i.e. Woolwich, i. 441. Idley Farm, in Ash, ii. 463. Ingress, in Swanscombe, ii. 415, 576. Ippedsfleet, v. Ebbesfleet. Jacket’s Court, in North Cray, ii. 154. Jeffrey's Manor, in Woolwich, i. 449. Joyden’s Wood, in North Cray, ii. 157. Joyden’s Wood, in Wilmington, ii. 331. Kecbyngrove, in Paul’s Cray, ii. 130. Kelseys, in Beckenham, i. 538. Kent House, in Beckenham, i. 545, ii. 565. Keston Parish, ii. 37, 569. Kevington, in St. Mary Cray, ii. 117. Kidbrooke, in Charlton, i. 436. Kilburne Priory, cited, ii. 75. Kiugesdune, i. e. Kingsdown, q. v. Kingledune, i e. Kingsdown, q. v. Kingsdown Parish, ii. 475, and Ap¬ pendix, 577. Kirby Court, v. Kirkby Court. Kirkby Court, in Horton, ii. 499. Knockholt, in Swanscombe, ii. 401. Laga, i. e. Lee, i. 492. Lambard’s Hospital, in Greenwich ii 558. Lambeth, Manor of, cited, ii. 371, 378. NAMES OE PLACES. Lameby, v. Lmnienby. Lamienby, in Bexley, ii. 168. Langnfel, i. e. Longfield, q. v. Langefeld, i. e. Longfield, q. v. Langley Park, in Beckenham, i. 541. Langley, House of Briars at, ii. 306. Leason Heath, in Erith, ii. 228. Leaves Green, in Cudham, ii. 60. Leaves Green, in Keston, ii. 37. Lee, i. 492. Lee, Parish of, Appendix, 562, 563. Legheart, i. e. Lee, i. 492. Leslies, morlo Erith, q. v. Lesnes Abbey, in Erith, ii. 249, 592. Lesnes Manor, alias Erith, ii. 231. Lcvesham, i.e. Lewisham, i. 503. Lewisham, i. 503. Lewisham Manor, cited, ii. 358. Lewisham Parish, Appendix, ii. 563. Linckhill, Borough of, cited, ii. 2. Lisna, i. q. Lesnes, modo Erith, q. v. Litelai Hundred, modo Little and Lesnes, ii. 184. Little and Leslies Hundred, ii. 184. Littlcbrook Manor, in Stone, ii. 386, 388. Little Hoo, v. Hoo. Littlemote Manor, in Eynsford, ii. 533. Loisnes, i. e. Lesnes, modo Erith, q. v. Lolingestone, i. e. Lullingstoue, q. v. Longfield Parish, ii. 440, and Ap¬ pendix, 577. Lullingstone Parish, ii. 539-540. Mapledescam, i.e. Maplescombe, q.v. Mapeldreskampe, i. e. Maplescombe, q.v. Maplescap, i. e. Maplescombe, q. v. Maplescombe, near Kingsdown, ii. 483. Mares Place, in Cowdham, ii. 74. Marshall’s Court, in Crayford, ii. 275, 573. Mayfield Place, Manor, in Orpington, ii. 103. May Street, in Crayford, ii. 279. Mayvil, alias Mayfield Place. Milton Street, Hamlet in Swanscombe, ii. 401. Moated Place, in Deptford, i. 357. Morden College, in Charlton, i. 429. Mote, Little, Manor, in Eynsford, ii. 533. Moltingham Hamlet, in Chesilhurst, ii. 19. Mottingham Hamlet, in Eltham, i. 478. Mount Mascall, North Cray, ii. 154, and 571. Mount Pleasant, in Bexlev, ii. 176, 572. Mount Pleasant, in Wilmington, ii. 330. Nethercombe, in Greenwich, i. 3S6. Newbery, in Crayford, ii. 574. Newell, in Orpington, ii. 97. Nightingale Hall, on Shooter’s Hill, i. 457. Nockholt Parish, ii. 78. Norsted Manor, in Chelsfield, i. 91. North Court, in Kingsdown, ii. 476. North Cray Parish, ii. 141, 571. Northend, Hamlet, in Crayford, ii. 264. Northlleet, lloman station near, cited, ii. 423. Northumberland Heath, in Crayford, ii. 264. Noviomagus, ii. 39, 267. Ockholt, alias Schott’s Manor, modo Shelleys, in Nockholt, ii. 80. Ockmere, St. Mary Lyng, Ockmere Manor, olim 2 manors, viz. Ackmere and Sentling, in St. Mary Cray, ii. 114. Old Court, in Greenwich, i. 385, 387. Oldcourt House, in Cowdham, ii. 60. Orkesden Manor, in Eynsford, ii. 531. Orpington Parish, ii. 97, and Appen¬ dix, 569. Orpintun, i. e. Orpington, q. v. Ospringe Manor, cited, ii. 115. Park Place, in Eltham, i. 477. Patten Grove, in Orpington, ii. 570. Paul’s Cray Parish, ii. 125. Paul’s Cray Hill Seat, ii. 126, 130. Penge Green, in Beckenham, i. 528. Perry Street Hamlet, in Crayford, ii. 264. Perry Street, in Lewisham, i. 504. Perry Street Hamlet, in Orpington, ii. 570. Petham Place, in Earninghara, ii. 521. Petham Court, in Eynsford, ii. 521, 533. Petley’s Place, in Downe, ii. 54. Pickerdav, in Erith, ii. 228. Pickhurst Manor, in Hayes, ii. 22, 568. Place Green, in Chesilhurst, ii. 2. Place House, in Lewisham, i. 504; ii. 564. Placentia Manor, in Greenwich, i. 394. Plaistow Hamlet, in Bromley, i. 551. Pleazance Manor, in Greenwich, i. 394. Plumsted Parish, ii. 203. Pole Manor, in Southfleet, ii. 432. Portbridge, alias Bignors, q. v. Porteslade Church, i. 142. Pratt’s Bottom, a e.Spratt’s Bottom, q. v. Ravensbourne River, ii. 39. Red House, in Deptford, i. 342. Redlege, i. e. Ridley, q. v. Redlegh, i. e. Ridley, q. v. Reynolds’ Place, in Horton, ii. 502. Reynold Smiths, Hamlet of, in St. Mary Cray, ii. 570. Ridley Parish, ii. 458, 577. Rochester, Priory of, ii. IS, 76, 323, 336, 339, 362, 369, 378, 386,425, 434, 437, 441, 491, 565. Rochester Castle, cited, ii. 412,413. ltokesley, alias Ruxley Hundred, ii. 1. Roman Camp at Keston, ii. 38. Roman Road, ii. 267, 292, 384, 402, 422. Rowehill Manor,in Wilmington, ii. 335. Rufferth Chantry, in Orpington, ii. 103. Ruxley Parish, ii. 141. Ruxley Manor, ii. 142. Rye House, in Otford, ii. 70. St. John’s Manor, in Sutton, ii. 347, 365. St. Margaret Hills, alias Helles St. Margaret, Hamlet and Chapel, in Darent, q.v., ii. 373-381. St. Mary Cray Parish, ii. 112, 570. St. Mary Lyng, Ockmere Manor, olim 2 manors, viz. Ackmere and Sent¬ ling, in St. Mary Cray, ii. 114. St. Thomas’s Hospital, in London, cited, ii. 103. Savoy Hospital, in Loudon, ii. 103. Saye’s Court, alias West Greenwich Manor, in Deptford, i. 350, 351, 353. Scadbury Manor, in Chesilhurst, ii. 7. Schottis, Manor of, alias Ockholt, q. v. Scotgrove Manor, in Ash, ii. 469. Sedcop, i. e. Sidcup, q. v. Sentling Manor, St. Mary Lyng, Ock¬ mere, ii. 114. Shawfield House, in Bromley, i. 551. Shelleys, Manor of, olim Ockholt, alias Schottis, in Nockholt, ii. 80. Shere Hall, in Wilmington, ii. 330. Shooter’s Hill, i. 456. Shorue Parish, cited, ii. 428. Shottis Manor, alias Ockholt, modo Shelleys, in Nockholt, ii. 80. Shrawfield, in Lee, i. 494. Sidcup, Hamlet, in Foots Cray, ii. 139. Simpsons, in Bromley, i. 560, ii. 567. Sipeham, now Sydenham, in Lewisham, i. 504. Skinner’s Place, in Deptford, i. 358. Southall, alias Woolwich Manor, i. 446; ii. 561. South Ash Manor, in Ash, ii. 467. Soutliborough Hamlet, in Bromley, ii. 567. South Court Manor,in Eynsford, ii. 5 30. South Darent Hamlet, in Horton, ii. 373, 375, 494. Southend Hamlet, in Eltham, i. 477. Southend Hamlet, in Lewisham, i. 504. Southend, Lewisham, Mustard Mill at, ii. 564. Southfleet Parish, ii. 421, 576. Southwark, St. Mary Overy’s Priory in, cited, ii. 217, 420. Spratt’s Bottom, Hamlet in Chelsfield, ii. 84. Stampit Chantry, in Dartford, ii. 326, 376. Stanes, i. e. Stone, q. v. Stanham Hamlet, in Dartford, ii. 316, 574. Stanhill Hamlet, in Wilmington, ii. 331, 336, 339, 441. Stantunc, i. e. Stone, q. v. Stockbery Manor, cited ii. 277, 413. Stoke Manor, cited, ii. 427. Stone Parish, ii. 384, 576. - Stone Castle, ii. 390. Stone House, alias Moated Place, in Deptford, i. 357. Stone Place, ii. 394. Stonewood Hamlet, in Stone, ii. 384. Stratford Abbey, in Essex, cited in Erith, ii. 253. Strode, Hospital of, cited, ii. 341. Sud Crai, i. e. St. Mary Cray, q. v. SuffolkPlace Farm,in Plumsted,ii. 216. Suinescamp, i. e. Swanscombe, q. v. Sundridge Manor, in Bromley, i. 559. Suthfleta, i. e. Southfleet, q. v. Suthtuna, i. e. Sutton at Hone. Sutton at Hone Lath, ii. 1. Sutton at Hone Parish, ii. 343. Sutton at Hone Manor, ii. 348. Sutton at Hone Place, ii. 352. Swaneslcampe, i. e. Swanscombe, q. v. Swanley Hamlet, in Sutton, ii. 359. Swanscombe Parish, ii. 399,576. Swegenscomp, i. e. Swanscombe, q. v. Sydenham Hamlet, in Lewisham, i. 504. Sydenham Manor, in Lewisham, ii. 564. Tang Court, alias Tong Court, modo Town Court Farm, in Chesilhurst, ii. 15, 217, 568. Tarent, i. e. Darent, q. v. Tarentefort, i. e. Dartford, q. v. Temple Manor, in Dartford, ii. 301. Temple, Seat in Lewisham, i. 528. Tong Court, alias Tang Court, modo Town Court Farm, in Chesilhurst, ii. 15, 217, 56S. Tower Hill, Abbot and Convent of, cited, ii. 460, 461. Town Court Farm, olim Tang Court, alias Tong Court, in Chesilhurst, ii. 15, 217, 56S. Trinity House, in Deptford, i. 358. Trinity Priory, in London, cited, ii. 181, 260. ^ Trowmers, a Seat in Downe, ii. 54. Trundle Down, in Darent, ii. 369. Tubbendens, a Seat in Farnborougli, ii. 50. Yagniacaj, cited, ii. 423. Vale Mascall, in North Cray, ii. 156. Votes Cray, i. e. Foots Cray, q. v. Waklins, alias Walkins, in Paul’s Cray, ii. 131. Waldens Manor, in St. Mary Cray, ii. 121 . Walkins, alias Waklins, in Paul’s Cray, ii. 131. Wantsum Farm, in Bexley, ii. 164, 572. Washers, in the Woods, alias Sun¬ dridge, in Bromley, i. 560. Watlande, i. e. Woodland, in Kings¬ down, ii. 488. Well Hall, in Eltham, i. 470. Welling Hamlet, in East Wickham, ii. 163, 185. Westcombe, in Greenwich, i. 386, 387. Wested Farm, in Eynsford, ii. 527. Westminster Abbey, cited, ii. 214, 249. Weston Cross Hamlet, in Swans¬ combe, ii. 401. Westwood, in Erith, ii. 250. Westwood Abbey, i. q. Leslies Abbey, q. v., ii. 249. West Wickham Parish, ii. 29, 569. West Yoke Hamlet, in Ash, ii. 463. Wicheham, i. e. West Wickham, q. v. Wick, alias Woodlands Manor, in Kingsdown, ii. 488. Wickham East Parish, ii. 184. Wickham West Parish, ii. 29, 569. Wilmentuna, i. e. Wilmington, q. v. Wilmington Parish, ii. 328, 574, 575. Wilmintune, i. e. Wilmington, q. v. Wingfield Bank, in Southfleet, ii. 422. Wippedsfleet, v. Ebbsfleet. Wlewic, i. e. Woolwich, i. 441. Woldham Parish, cited, ii. 427. Woodlands, Seat in Greenwich, ii. 558. Woodlands, alias Wick Manor, in Kingsdown, ii. 488. Woollet Hall, in North Cray, ii. 142. Woolwich, i. 441. Woolwich Parish, Appendix, ii. 560. Wrieklesmarsh, in Charlton, i. 426. Wrotham, cited, ii. 489. Yoke, West, Hamlet in Ash, ii. 463. 52 ' INDEX TO HUNDREDS, MANORS, Etc., WITH REFERENCES TO HASTED. Acliestau Hundred—Axstane, ii. 343. Acres—Acrise, viii. 112. Addelan—Deal, x. 2, 4. Adilovtesbrige Hundred—Aloesbridge, viii. 375. .Mvetone—Elmstone, ix. 132. yEslingham — Triads bury (? is it in Domesday), iii. 525, 531. Agene—Old Romney, viii. 441. Aiglessa—Eccles, iv. 433. Aihorde Hundred—Eyhorne, v. 323. Aimolde — Haimvold, in Woodnes- borough, x. 133. Aldelose—Aldylose, in Hastingligh, viii. 30. Aldintone—Aldington, viii. 317. Alhnm—Eleham, viii. 97. Alkliain—Alkebam, not in Domesday (in Barony of Folkestone), viii. 134. Alnoitone—Elnothington, in Holling- borne, v. 405. Alteham —Eltham, i. 459-460. Apeldres—Apeldore, vii. 255. Apletone — Apulton, in Waldenliam, x. 57. Asliurst, not in Domesday, v. 276. Audintone—Aldington, in Tlnmham, v. 525. Bachebam—Beckenham, i. 529. Badelesmere, vi. 470. Bapehild, not in Domesday (Milton, paramount Manor), vi. 125. Barfrestone—Barfreston, x. 72. Basmere, see Badelesmere. Belice, i.e. Bircholt, viii. 11. Benedestede—Benstede, in Hunton, v. 149. Benindene—Benenden, vii. 175. Berham—Barham, ix. 351. Berisolt Hundred—Bircholt. viii. 1. Berisout Hundred—Bircholt, viii. 1. Berlinge—Birling, iv. 475. Bennelie—West Banning, or Bamjet, iv. 393. Bermelinge—East Banning, iv. SS6. Bersted, not in Domesday (in other Manors, v. 506), v. 505. Bethersden, not in Domesday (in several Boroughs, etc.), vii. 485. Betmontestun—Beamonston, or Beam- ston, in Westwell, vii. 417. Betshanger.not in Domesday (in North- borne Manor), x. 44. Bevesfel—Bewsfield, ix. 394. Bieknor, not in Domesday, v. 565. Bidborough, not in Domesday, v. 272. Biddenden, not in Domesday (chiefly dens and other parishes), vii. 130.' Bilissold Hundred—Bircholt, viii. 1. Bilsvitune—Bilsington, viii. 346. Birchington, not in Domesday (in Monckton paramount), x. 297. Bix—Bexley, ii. 165. Blacheinenestone—Blackmanstone,viii. 273. Blehem—Bleane, viii. 525. Bobbing, not in Domesday (Milton paramount Manor), vi. 194. Bocheland — Buckland, next Faver- sham, vi. 397, bis. Bochelande—Buckland, near Dover, ix. 464, and 466, bis. Bocolmul — Buckland, in Woodues- borough, x. 130. Bodesham — Bottsham, in Elmsted, viii. 40. Bogelei—Bewley, in Boughton Mal- herb, v. 411. Boltone Hundred, i. e. Boughton, vii. 1. Boltone—Boughton Malherb, v. 399. Boltone — Boughton Moncheusie, v. 338. Boltune—Boughton Aluph, vii. 386. Boltune—Boughton under Blean, vii. 5. Bonintone—Bonnington, viii. 332. Borden, not in Domesday (Milton pa¬ ramount Manor), vi. 69. Boreham—Burham, iv. 410. Borne—Pntrixboume, ix. 278. Borownot and Estrei Lnths, St. Augus¬ tine’s, viii. 498. Boseleu—Boxley, iv. 331. Breburne—Braborne, viii. 16. Bredgar, not in Domesday (Milton paramount Manor), vi. 99. Bredhurst, not in Domesday (in Hol- lingbourne Manor), v. 585. Brenchly, not in Domesday, v. 280. Brenset, not in Domesday (part of Newington), viii. 389. Bridge, not in Domesday (large part Patrixbourne paramount), ix. 287. Briestede, i.e. Brasted, iii. 147. Briseode Hundred—Bircholt, viii. 1. Brochestele — Temple, or Boswell Banks, in Ewell, ix. 434, bis. Bronlei—Bromley, i. 555. Brooke, in Wi, q. v. vii. 381. Brookland (not in Domesday), in several Manors, viii. 382. Broteham Hundred, i. e. Wrotham, v. 1. Broteham, i.e. Wrotham, iii. 10. Brunfelle—Bromfield, v. 503. Burnes—Bekesborne, ix. 268. Burnes—Bishopsborne, ix. 330. Burwarmaresc—Burmarsh, viii. 259. Camesing, in Testa de Nevill, i.e. Kem- sing, not in Domesday, iii. 32. Canterbury, xi. 4. Capel, not in Domesday, v. 193. Capell le Ferae, not in Domesday (be¬ longing to Alkham), viii. 142. Celca, i.e. Chalk, iii. 457, 458. Cerlentone—Charlton, near Dover, ix. 471. Cerletoue—Charlton, i. 422. Cert, see Litelcert, vii. 456. Certeham, i.e. Chartham, vii. 302. Certh—Chart Sutton, v. 354. Certh—Great Chart, vii. 499. Ceteham—Chatham, iv. 204. Challock, not in Domesday (Godmer- sliam and Wye paramount), vii. 322. Chart, see Litelcert, vii. 456. Chenoltone—Knolton, x. 88. Cheringes—Charing, vii. 433. Cheriton, not in Domesday (Barony of Folkestone), viii. 190. Chesilhurst — (Ciselhyrst), not in Domesday, ii. 3. Chestau—Keston, ii. 41. Chevening, not in Domesday, iii. 105. Chidingstone, in Textus Cidingstane, not in Domesday, iii. 210. Cildresham, i.e. Luddenham, vi. 387. Cilledene—Chillenden, x. 95. Cilleham—Chillmm, vii. 269. Ciraieinga, in Textus, i. e. Kemsing, not in Domesday, iii. 32. Ciresfel—Chelsfield, ii. 84. Ciselhyrst—Chesilhurst, ii. 3. Cistelet—Chistlet, ix. 102. Clive, i.e. Cliff, iii. 503, 508. Cobham, not in Domesday (but Hen- hurst in Cobham and Hadone), iii. 404. Coclestane, i.e. Cookstone, iii. 391. Codeham—Cowdham, ii. 61. Colinge, i.e. Cowling, iii. 517. Colret—Coldred, Lx. 387. Cowden (Cudena, in Textus), not in Domesday, iii. 203. Crai—Foots Cray, ii. 135. Craie—Paul’s Cray, ii. 126. Cranbrook, not m Domesday, pro¬ bably in the paramount of Seven Hundreds, vii. 90, and vii. 89. “ Cray, another”—North Cray, ii. 142. Crecean Ford, i.e. Crayford, in Domes¬ day Erhede, ii. 263. Croctune—Crawton or Crofton, in Or- pingto.n, ii. 101. Crundal, i. e. Dromwod or Tremworth, vii. 368. Cumbe—Combe, in Braborne, viii. 21. Cypenham—Sydenham, i. 504. Danitone. i.e. Denton, near Gravesend, iii. 473. Danitone—Denton, near Barham, ix. 359. De La Sele; see Seale. Davington, not in Domesday, vi. 372. Deice, Great and Little, it. 168, 171. Delge, i. e. Deice, Great and Little, iv. 168, 171. Dene—Dean Court, in Westwell, vii. 420. Deptford, not in Domesday, i. 340. Detling, not in Domesday. Dictune—Ditton, iv. 456. Dimchurch, not in Domesday (in East- bridge), viii. 264. Dodeham—Doddington, vi. 308. Downe (Dune), not in Domesday, in Manor of Great Orpington, iii. 54. Dromwod; see Crundal, vii. 368. Dunehafort Hundred—Downhamford, ix. 142. Dunkirk Ville, not in Domesday (the King’s Forest of Blean), ix. 2. Ealdinges—Yalding, v. 158. Eurd; see Erhede. Ebeney, not in Domesday (Aldington paramount), viii. 494. Ece—Ash, near Wingham, ix. 191. Eddintune—Addington, iv. 544 bis. Edenbridge (Eatonbridge, Eddelnes- brege, Edilnebrigg, Pons Edeleni), Manor of Westerham is paramount over it, not in Domesday, iii. 179, 181. Edesham—Adisham, ix. 182. Egerton, not in Domesday (Charing paramount), vii. 449. Eisse—Ash, next Wrotham, ii. 464. Elentun—Allington, iv. 449. Elesford—Aylesford, iv. 423. Elmsted, not in Domesday, viii. 35. Ensford—Evnsford, ii. 528. Erclei—Hartley, ii. 452 bis. Erhede or Eard—Crayford, ii. 268. Eritli, formerly called Leslies, ii. 227. Ernolton, i. e. Elwerton, in Stone, near Faversham, vi. 395. Esledes—Leeds, v. 479. Eslinges—Easling, vi. 423, ter. Esmerefel—Ashenlield, in Waltham, ix. 324. Esmetone—Elmington, in Eythorne, Esnoilaud—Snodlaud, iv. 466. Essamele Hundred, i.e. Sliainel, iii. 375. Essamelesford—Shalmsford Street, in Charlton, vii. 308. Essedene—Nashenden, iv. 167. Essela—Ashford, vii. 527. Essetisford—Ashford, vii. 527. Essewelle—Eastwell, vii. 401. Estanes—Stone, ii. 387. Estbridge—Eastbridge, viii. 276. Estefort—Ashford, vii. 527. Estoches—Stoke, iv. 35, 39. Estochingebenre — Stockingbury, in Peckham, v. 102. Estotinges—Stowting, viii. 47. Estraites Hundred—Street, viii. 281. Estraites—Street Manor, in Limtie, viii. 294. Estrei—Eastrv, x. 103. Estrei and Borownot Laths, St. Au¬ gustine’s, viii. 498. Est Selvc (Selve)—Shelve, in Lenham, v. 431 ter. Esturai—Sturrey, ix. 77. Estursete, viii. 318. Estursete Hundred—Westgate Hun¬ dred, ix. 1. Estursete—Westgate, Canterbury, ix. 29, xii. 140. Estwelle—Eastwell, vii. 401. Eswalt—St. Alban’s, in Nonington, ix. 254. Etwelle—Hinxhill, vii. 560. Etwelle—Ewell, ix. 430. Ewelie—Ewell, ix. 429, 430, bis. Eythorne, not in Domesday (? in Adisham), x. 62. Fnchesham—Fawkham, ii. 445. Fairfield, not in Domesday, viii. 379. Panne—Vanne, or Vannes, in Crundal, vii. 374, bis. Famborough — (Feainberga), not in Domesday, ii. 46. Favreshant—Faversham, vi. 324. Fearnberga—Farnborough, ii. 16. Felberge Hundred, i. e. Felborough, vii. 263. Fereburue—West Farborn, in Harriet- sham, v. 453. Ferlaga— East Farleigh, iv. 373. Kerlagu—West Farleigh, v. 138. Ferleberge, Hundred, i.e. Felborough, vii. 263. Ferlingelai—Farthinghoe, or Venson Dane, in Hougliam, ix. 45S. Ferningehain—Faruinghmn, four Ma- ^ nors, ii. 512. Flengeressa—Finglesham, in North- borne, ix. 595. Fletes, i.e. Fleet, in Ash, ix. 209. Forewic—Fordwich, ix. 56. Frandesberie, i.e. Frindsbury, iii. 529, bis. Fredenestede—Frinsted, v. 554. Fritlienden, not in Domesday ( ? hun¬ dreds paramount). vii. 113. Fulchestan—Polkstone, viii. 154. Gecham—Ickham, ix. 168. Gelingeham—Gillingham, iv. 229, and 233. Gelingehain (East Court Manor in)— Gillingham, iv. 233. Getinge—Geddings, in Wotton, ix. 369. Goc.stone—Gaston, near Dover ix 406. Godeselle—Godwell, in Great Chart vii. 503. Gomevslmin—Godmersham, vii. 321. Goodnestone, near v\ ingham, not in Domesday (Wingham 0 paramount), ix. 241. Goodnestone, next Faversham, not in Domesday, vi. 549. Goudhunt, iiot in Domesday, but full of dens, etc., belonuing' to otner Manors and Hundreds, vii. 38. Graiue, not in Domesday, Grean, Grven, and Gren, in old ‘MSS., iv. 250. Graveney (Gravenal in Domesday), Gravenea, Gravenel, etc. vii. 2s.' Gravesham, i.e. Gravesend, iii. 326. Grenvig Hundred, Blackheath Hun¬ dred, ii. 339. Grenviz—Greenwich, i. 392. Hackington, alias St. Stephen's; see Latiutone. Hadone, i. e. Haydon, in Cobham, iii. 427. Hagelei, i. e. Hawley, ii. 294. Hagene—Old Romney, viii. 441. Haglei, i. e. llawlev, in Sutton, ii. 353, 354. Haihorne Hundred, v. 323. Halden, High, in Seven Hundreds juris¬ diction, vii. 220. Hallinges, i.e. Hailing, iii. 378. HaLted, not in Domesday, iii. 13. Halslow, not in Domesday (Milton paramount Manor), vi. 36. Hama—Ham. x. 38. Hamolde — Haimvold, in Woodnes- borough, x. 133. Hanehest, j. e. Henhurst, in Cobham, iii. 425. Harbledowne, not in Domesdav (Ma¬ nor of Westgate Hundred’ para¬ mount), ix. 8. Ilardes—Upper Hardres, ix. 304. Hardres—Lower Hardres, ix. 300. llariardeshain—liarrietsham, v. 446. •5B* INDEX TO HUNDBEDS, MANOBS, Etc., WITH BEEEBENOES TO HASTED. Hnrtlip, not in Domesday (Milton the paramount Manor), vi. 23. Haslow—Hadlow, v. 17S. Hastingelai—Hastingligh, viii. 28. , llathewolden, i.e. High Halden, q. v. Hawkhurst, not in Domesday (its prin¬ cipal Manors probably appendages to Wye), Vii. 143. Hawking, not in Domesday (Barony of Folkestone), viii. 148. Hayes (Hese), not in Doinesdav, ii. 22 . Ilechani, i. e. Higham, iii. 484. Hedcorne, not in Domesday, v. 324. Hede—Hythe, viii. 232. llelmestrei Hundred, i. e. Ruxley Hun¬ dred, ii. 2. Hengestefell—Hinxhill, vii. 560. Herbretiton—Harbilton, in Harriet- sham, v. 454. Herne, not in Domesday (Reculver paramount), ix. 86. Hernehill, not in Domesday (The Arch¬ bishop’s Manor of Bougliton Hun¬ dred paramount), vii. 19. Hertange—Hartanger, in Barfrestone, x. 74. Hese—Hayes, ii. 22. llever (Heure, Evere), not in Domes- dav, iii. 190. Hicham—Hougham, ix. 458. High Halden; see Halden. • Hinxhill; see Hengestefelle, vii. 558. Hoilitigeborde—Hollingbornc, v. 463. Hoo—Allhallows, not in Domesday (“Deremannes circe de Hou,” in Textus), iv. 20. Hoo St. Mary's, not in Domesday (“Ordraor circe de Hou,” in Textus), iv. 20. Hope, All Saints’, not in Domesday (Romney jurisdiction), viii. 415. Horsmonden, not in Domesday, v. 311. Hortone—Horton Kirby, ii. 495. Hortoue, i. e. Horton l’arva, in Cbart- Hortone—Monks’ Horton, viii. 53. I lortun—Monks’ Horton, viii. 54. llothe, not in Domesday (a borough of Reculver). ix. 96. Hothefield, not in Domesday (included probably in Chilham Manor), vii. 516. Hou, i.e. Hoo St. Warburgb, iv. 3. Hou, i. e. Howberv, in Crayford, ii. 277. Hacking, not in Domesday (in Hol- lingborne Manor, iv. 570), v. 569. Hulviz—Woolwich, i. 447. II unton, not in Domesday (see Bcne- destede), v. 146. Hurst, not in Domesday (in Alding¬ ton probably), viii. 327. Hythe, West; see West Hythe, viii.254. lfield (Iuelda, in Textus, Yelesfelde), not in Domesday, iii. 347. Ightham, not in Domesday, v. 33. Iveclmrch, not in Domesday (New Romney, and paramount), viii. 400. Iwade, or Warde, not in Domesday (Milton paramount Manor), vi. 203. Kemsing, not in Domesday; see Game- sing and Cimicinga. Kenardington, not in Domesday (in jurisdiction of Blackborne Hun¬ dred, Ilam Hundred, and Romney Marsh, and Apledore Manor), vii. 244. Kennington, not in Domesday, vii. 545. Kingsdown, next Sittingbourne, not in Domesday, vi. 112. Kingsdown, next Wrotham, not in Domesday, but Maplescombe, q. v. is, ii. 475, 4S3. Kingsnoth, not in Domesday (Wye Manor paramount), vii. 5S3. Kingston, not in Domesday (in Barony of Chilham), ix. 341. Lamberhurst, not in Domesday, v. 294. Lamport—Old Langport in Lid, viii. 425, 447. Langafel—Longfield, ii. 441. Langdon, East, not in Domesday (but some of its manors are, viz. Pising and Piuham), ix. 552. 54 * Langdon, West, not in Domesday (Barony of Folkestone), ix. 401. Langebrige Hundred, 1 Yoke in Hinx- liill, vii. 560. Langport—Longport, a Borough in eastern suburbs of Canterbury, xii. 228, 229. Languelei—Langley, v. 347. Lasela—Langley, in Beckenham (as conjectured by Hasted; but surely it is Seal), i. 541. Latintone—Hnckington, alias St. Ste¬ phen’s, ix. 44. Ledesdune, i.e. Luddesdown, iii. 368. Lee, i. 493. Leigh, see Lyghe. Leleburne—Ley borne, iv. 497. Lelevant—Leveland, vi. 462. Leminges—Liminge, viii.83. Lenham—Lenham, v. 428. Lerham—Lenham, v. 415. Lerthum, v. 415, 420. Lesnes—Erith, ii. 230. Levesham—Lewisham, i. 507. Lid, not in Domesday (limb of Barony, Aldington named, 424), viii. 421. Liddon, not in Domesday (in Barony of Folkestone), viii. 127. Limes, see Wellope, viii. 297, 298. Limne, not in Domesday (Aldington paramount), viii. 288. Limowart and Linuuart, i.e. Lath of Shipway, vii. 262. Linsted, not in Domesday, vi. 296. Linton, not in Domesday, iv. 367. Liteburne—Littlebourne, ix. 149. Litelai Hundred, “ Little and Lesnes,” ii. 184. Litel Wroteham, i. e. Little Wrotham, v. 13. Litlefelle Hundred, i. e. Littlefield. Lolingestone — Lullingston, three manors, ii. 540. Lore, not in Domesday, probably in¬ cluded in East Farleigh, iv. 362. Lyghe (Leaga, in Textus, La Lye), not in Domesday, iii. 258. Machehevet, i. a. Makenade, in Preston, next Faversham, vi. 538. Mapledescatu—Maplescomb, in Kings- dowu, ii. 4S4. Marden, not in Domesday, but an ap¬ pendage to the King’s Manor of Milton, vii. 53. Marley, appended to Bogelei or Bew- ley, in Marrietshain, v. 455. Maroimle—Mereworth, v. 72. Meddestan—Maidstone, iv. 285. Melestun—Milton, next Gravesend, iii. 337. Meletune, Milton, next Gravesend, iii. 337. Mellingetes, West Mailing, iv. 523. Mepeham—Meopham, iii. 359. Mersehan—Mersham, vii. 595. Mcrston (in Textus, Merestun), not in Domesday, iii. 477. Metlinges—East Mailing, iv. 510. Middeltune — Milton, next Sitting- bourne, vi. 171. Midelea—Midley, viii. 410. Milsted, not in Domesday (Milton paramount Manor), vi. 107- Milton, next Canterbury (included in Estnrsete, or Wcstgate), ix. 29. Molash, not in Domesday (Chilham honour paramount), vii. 292. Monocstune—Monkton, in Thanet, x. 255. Mundingeham — Great and Little Mongcham, ix. 573, 580. Murston, ? in Domesday, vi. 143. Nackington, not iu Domesday, ix. 291. Nedestede, i.e. Nettlestcd, v. 120. Neucerce Hundred—Newchurch, viii. 337. Neuentone—Newington, next Folk- stone, viii. 200. Neventoue—Newington, next Folk- stone, viii. 199. Nevvecerce—Newchurch, viii. 339, bis. Newedene—Newendon, vii. 166. Newetone—Newington, next Sitting- bourne, vi. 47. Newnhain, not in Domesday, vi. 413. Nockholt, in Great Orpington Manor, not in Domesday, ii. 78. Nonington, not in Domesday (Wing- ham paramount), ix. 251. Norborne — Northbourue, near Deal, Nordende—Little Barton, in Canter¬ bury, xi. 163. Nordeslinges—Easling, vi. 423. Norfluet, i. e. Northlleet, iii. 302. Nortone—Norton, vi. 402. Notestede—Nutsted, iii. 352. Obtrepole—Otterpoole, iu Limne, viii. 290. Ofeham—Offham, iv. 536, 537. Oistreham, i.e. Westerham, iii. 162. Oldehaan—Wouldham, iv. 401. Olecumbe—Ulcomb, v. 388. Ore, vi. 382. Orgarswike, not in Domesday, viii. 270. Orlavestone—Orlastone, viii. 361. Orpington—Little Orpington, alias Mayfield, ii. 103, 104. Orpintun—Orpington, ii. 99. Ospringes—Ospringe, vi. 504. Ostrehara Huudrecl, i.e. Westerham, iii. 158. Oteford—Otford, iii. 22. Oteham—Otham, v. 514. Olringeberge, i. e.Watringbury, v. 108, 109. Otringedene—Otterden, v. 534. Oxenai—Oxney, viii. 479. Qxney, near St. Margaret-at-Cliffe, not in Domesday (Barony of Folkestone), ix. 409. Padlesworth, not in Domesday (per¬ haps included in Lyminge or New¬ ington), viii. 119. ' Palestrei—Palster, in Wittersham, viii. 488. Pambury,.not in Domesday, v. 260. Pecheham—East Peckham, v. 93. Pecheham—West Peckham, v. 57. Pellesorde—Paddlesworth, iv.' 471. Penshurst, not in Domesday (Pennes- herst, in Textus), iii. 227. Perie—Perry Court, in Preston, next Faversham, vi. 540. Pesinges—Pising, in East Langdon, ix. 552. Piham—Pinhnm, in East Langdon, ix. 552. Pirnpa (in Nettlested ?), v. 120, 121. Pimpe (in West Farleigh), v. 139. Pinnedene—Pinden, in Horton Kirby, ii. 504. Piteham—Petham, ix. 311. Piventone—Pevington, in Pluckley, vii. 473. Pluchelei—Pluckley, vii. 464. Plumstede—Plumsted, ii. 205. Poltone—Polton, ix. 445. Popeselle—Popeshall, in Coldred, ix. 389. Postlinges—Postling, viii. 212. Presteutune, i.e. Presteton, q. v. Prestetone, i.e. Preston, next Faver¬ sham, vi. 533. Prestetune—Preston, next Wingliam, ix. 136. Rainham, not in Domesday (Milton the paramount Manor), vi. 4. Rapentone—Great and Little ltepton, in Ashford, vii. 531. Redleye—Ridley, ii. 459. Ricsce—Ryarsh, iv. 489. Ringetone—Ringletone, iu Woodnes- borough, x. 156. Ringwold, not in Domesday (part of Barony of Chilham), x. 30. Ripa, and ad Ripam, River, ix. 437. Ripple, not in Domesday (St. Augus¬ tine’s land), ix. 565. Rochinges—'Rucking, viii. 354. Roctdf—Reculver, ix. 116. Rodmersham, not in Domesday (Mil- ton paramount Manor), vi. 117. Rolveuden, not in Domesday (in juris¬ diction of Seveu Hundreds), vii. 1S2. Romenel—New Romney, viii. 447 bis, 448 bis. Romney Road, not in Domesday, viii. 439. Rongostone—Ringlestone, in Holling- borne, vi. 5.6S. Rovecestre—Rochester, iv. 165. St. Dunstan’s, next Canterbury, not in Domesday (in Westgate Manor), ix. 34. Si. John’s, Margate, not in Domesday (? in Dover), x. 312. St. Lawrence, Thanet, not in Domes¬ day (Minster paramount), x. 380. St. Margaret-at-Clifle, ix. 414. St. Marie’s Church, not in Domesday (Romney jurisdiction), viii. 406. St. Martin’s Ville, in Aldington, viii. 317. St. Mildred’s, Minster, Thanet, x. 272. St. Nicholas, Thanet, not in Domes- day. St. Peterls, Thanet, not in Domesday (? in Dover), x. 355. St. Stephen’s, alias Hackington (see Latintone). Salteode—Saltwood, viii. 221. Sandhurst, not in Domesday (Alding¬ ton Manor and Acrise Manor claim Sanduuic—Sandwich, x. 155. Saudwice—Sandwich, x. 155. Schorham, not in Domesday, but in Textus—Shoreham, iii. 2. Seale (La Sele and De La Sele), not in Domesday according to Hasted, iii. 51. Sedlinges—Sellindge, viii. 305. Sele, La; see Seale. Selinge—Shelving, alias Woodncs- Sellinges—Selling, vii. 41. Selve, v. 431, ter. Sentlinge and Sudcrai, 2 Manors (now 1 Manor, viz. St. Mary Lyng, Oek- mere), St. Mary Cray, ii. 114. Seouenacca, i.e. Sevenoke, q. v. Sesaltre—Scasaltcr, viii. 500. Seven Hundreds, always in Crown (viz. hundreds of Cranbrook, Barkley, Blackborne, Tenterden, Rolveuden, Selbrithede, Bromfield), vii. 89. Sevenoke, not in Domesday (Seoue¬ nacca, in Textus), iii. 60. Sevington, not in Domesday (Conings- brook Manor paramount), vii. 577. Shadoxhunt (Seven Hundreds para- _ mount), vii. 238. Sheldwick, not in Domesday, vi. 481. Shepey Isle, none of its parishes in Domesday, vi. 206-285. Shipborne (Scriburna, in Textus), not in Domesday, v. 45. Sholdon, not in Domesday (North- borne paramount), ix. 605. Shoreham, not in Domesday; see Schor¬ ham. Shorne (Scorene—Somes), not in Domesday, iii. 443. Siberteswalt—Shebbertswell, ix. 376. Sibertsuualt, Westcourt Manor, in Shebbertswell, ix. 379, 380. Sifletone, in Ditton, iv. 456. Sipehara—Sydenham, i. 504. Sittingborne, ? in Domesday (Milton paramount Manor), vi. 155. Smarden, not iu Domesday (Shurland, Otterden, Throwley claim over it), vii. 478. Snargate, not in Domesday (in para¬ mount Aldington?), viii. 376. Snave, not iu Domesday (in several hundreds), viii. 394. Soaneclive—Swaycliffe, viii. 521. Soles, in Nonington, ix. 256. Soltonc, Solton in West Cliife, ix. 423. Soinerden Hundred, none of the parishes in it, or wholly in the Weald —named in Domesday, iii. 189. Sondresse, i.e. Sandridge, iii. 128. Speldhurst (Spelehurst — in Textus, Speldhurst), not in Domesdav, iii. 275. Stanefclle—Stalisfield, vi. 438. Stanford, not iu Domesday, viii. 63. Stansted, not in Domesday, v. 1. Staple, not in Domesday (Adisham paramount), ix. 185. Staplehurst, not in Domesday (pro¬ bably Seven Hundreds paramount), vii. il9. Stellinges—-Stelliug, viii. 92. INDEX TO HUNDREDS, MANORS, Etc., WITH REFERENCES TO HASTED. Stepeiulone—Stuppington, in Norton, vi. 40S. Stoches—Stoke, iv. 39. Stochingeberge—Stockbury, v. 574. Stodmarsh, not in Domesday (within Wickham), ix. 142. Stonar, not in Domesday (Minster pa¬ ramount), x. 414. Stone, in Oxney, not in Domesday (Aldington paramount), viii. 481. Stourmouth, not in Domesday, ix. 120. Strodes, i. e. Stroud, not in Domes¬ day, iii. 546. Stroud, not in Domesday, iii. 546. Stursete—Westgate, Canterbury, xii. 140. Suanetoue—Swanton, in Liddon, viii. 129, bis. Sudcrai and Sending, two manors (now St. Mary Lyng, Ockmere, one manor)—St. Mary Cray, ii. 114. Sudlleta—Southfleet, ii. 420. Sudtone—Town Sutton or Sutton Va¬ lence, v. 364, 366. Sudtone—East Sutton, v. 376. Suestone, in Hinxhill, vii. 560. Suineseamp—Swanscombe, ii. 404. SuttonatHone, notinDomesday,ii.343. Sutton, near Walmer, not in Domes¬ day, ix. 558. Svanetone—Swanton, in Liddon, viii. 129, bis. Swingfield, not in Domesday (in Ba¬ rony of Folkestone), viii. 122. Tangas—Tong, vi. 136. Tarent—Darent and St. Margaret Hills, ii. 370, 373, bis. Tarenteford—Hartford, ii. 294. Tenham, not in Domesday, Arch¬ bishop’s Land, vi. 285. Tenterden, not in Domesday (in Seven Hundreds), vii. 200. Tepindene, i.e. Tiffendeu, in High Malden, vii. 222. Testan—Teston, v. 129. Teuegate—Evegate or Thevegate, in Smeeth, viii. 3. Thanington, not in Domesday (part of Westgate Hundred Manor), ix. 22. Ticheteste — Tickenhurst, in North- bourne, ix. 593. Tilemanestoue—Tilmanstone, x. 79. Tintenlone—Tinton, in Warehorne, viii. 368, 369. Titentone—Tinton, in Warehorne, viii. 339. Tivcdele—Tudeley, v. 257. Tollentru Hundred, i. e. Toltingtrow, iii. 301. Tonebriga, not in Domesday—Tun¬ bridge, v. 19G. Tout intune—Tottington, iv. 431. Trernworth; see Crundal, vii. 368. Trevelai—Throwley, vi. 449. Trotesclive—Trottesclive, iv. 550. Tuiferde Hundred, i. e. Twyford, v. 91. Tunbridge, not in Domesday, v. 196. Tunestelle—Tunstall, vi. 82. Turneham—Thunham, v. 521. Upchurch, not in Domesday (Milton the paramount manor), vi. 27. Walmer, not in Domesday (? part of Folkestone Manor), x. 25. Waltham, not in Domesday (in differ¬ ent hundreds), ix. 319. Walwaresere—Waldershare, x. 51. Wauesberge — Woodnesborough, x. 125. Warchelestan Hundred — Wachling- stone, v. 255. Warde; see Iwade. Warwintone, i.e. Upper Garwmton, in Littleboume, ix. 153. Welle—Westwell, vii. 413. Wellop, belonging to Aldington, in Limne (“ Limes,” in Domesday), viii. 298.- Werde Hundred—Worth, viii. 253. Werehome—Warehone, viii. 367. Westbere, not in Domesday (Westgate and Chislet paramount), ix. 69. Westclive—West Cliffe, ix. 419. Westgate Hundred Ville, alias Dun¬ kirk Ville, q. v., ix. 2. West Hythe, not in Domesday, viii. 254. Whitfield, alias Bewsfield; see under Bevesfel. Whitstaple, not in Domesday (Barony of Chilham?), viii. 509. Wi (Brooke), vii. 382. Wi—Wye, vii. 345. TAYLOR AND CO., PRINTERS, LITTLE QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN’S INN FIELDS. Wicheham—West Wickham, ii. 31. Wicheham—Wickham Breaux, ix. 159. Wickham, East, not in Domesday. Willesborough (Wye paramount), not in Domesday, vii. 566. Wilmington, not in Domesday, but included in Dartford, ii. 332. Wimlingswold, not in Domesday (Wingham paramount), ix. 262. Winchelesmere—Wielding, v. 550. Wingeham—Wingham, ix. 226. Witenemers—Wricklesmarsh, in Charl¬ ton, i. 426. Witherskam, not in Domesday (Al¬ dington paramount), viii. 486. Wiwarlet—Lath of Scray, vi. 1. Wood, not in Domesday (part of Bir- chington), x. 310. Woodchurch, not in Domesday (Seven Hundreds, Apledore, and Wye, all have jurisdiction), vii. 226. Woodland (united to Kingsdown), not in Domesday, iii. 145. Word, not in Domesday (? in Eastry), x. 145. Wormsall, not in Domesday (appended to Boughton Malherb, v. 562), v. 561. Wotton, not in Domesday (? in Bo¬ roughs of Shelving and Gedding), ix. 364. Wulwiche (in Domesday, Ilulviz)— Woolwich, i. 447.