Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/englishgraphicsaOObuss_0 LECTURES ON ENGLISH COMIC & SATIRIC ART, By Mr. R. W. BUSS, (Painter, Designer on Wood, and Etcher,) 46, Camden Street, Camden Town, London. The Empire, Oct. 23, 1853. Comic and Satiric Aet.— On Thursday evening, Mr. 11. W. Buss, the well-known Artist, delivered at the Whittington Club, the first of a series of Lectures on English, Comic, and Satiric Art. The object of Mr. Buss in thus introducing himself to the public, is to enlighten them upon a branch of art which he says has not yet been duly appreciated. He has been many years occupied in collecting materials, pictorial and otherwise, for his Lectures, and the information he imparts is abundantly sufficient to show that he was not only well qualified for his task, but that he knew all the most available sources from whence information and assistance could be procured. He traces the history and progress of caricature and comic art, from the earliest periods to the present time ; and illustrates in a graphic and instructive manner the principle upon which he starts as the basis of his lecture, viz., that artists who have delineated human nature in its merriest aspect have won for themselves a higher position than the world has been pleased to accord to them. He points out the true end and aim of pictorial satire, and shows with considerable humour how much of what is generally called caricature, is produced by the efforts which fashion makes to distort the works of nature. This species of caricature he terms " unintentional," and he explains that an artist may sometimes produce a very ludicrous design, without intending it to be so. All his positions are demonstrated by pictorial illustrations, conceived and executed in the true spirit of genial humour, and the gene- ral effect of the lecture is that the audience are excited to merriment, whilst they arc- receiving instruction in a most interesting branch of art. Morning Herald, Oct. 28, 1853. English Comic and Satiric Art.— Mr. Ii. W. Buss, last night gave the second of a series of lectures at the Whittington Club, on English Comic and Satiric Art. The Lecturer reviewed the period when caricature was first identified with the higher order of Satire, with the works of Pope, Swift, and Arbuthnot. Then came political caricature, the spirit for which is still retained in this free country ; for it was an established fact ihat caricature. could not flourish under a despotism. It would be impossible to enumerate the many highly interesting illustrations given. As establishing the character of Hogarth, as superior to all his contemporaries the Lec- turer brought forward his " Gin Lane," "Beer Street," " the Landscape in False Per- spective," "the Beggars' Opera," &c. The keen wit and marvellously fine satire of Hogarth, render liis compositions perfect studies, for they may be repeatedly viewed before the numberless points they display, politically or morally, can be really appreciated. Tracing the progress of caricature, the lecture ended with the works of Bunbury, which in humour, are perhaps not surpassed. The next lecture will commence with Gillray, and George Cruikshank, and the course will close with the Artists of the present day. HB.&c. The arrangement of the discourse was extremely pleasing, and Mr. Buss certainly shews a perfect knowledge of the very interesting subject which he so admirably illustrates. Eastern Star, November 5, 1853. Comic and Satiric Art at the Whittington Club. — Mr. Ii.W. Buss, well-known as a humorous painter and designer, on Thursday last gave the second of a course of four lectures on English Comic and Satiric Art, in the large room of the above club- house. In a brief review of the progress of the fine arts from ancient times, he con- tended that the merry phase of art, like that of literature, possessed especial claims to the sympathies of all civilized communities ; for although not so exalted in its aim as the serious and the epic, still the vivid images of weakness, folly and vice, which it re- flected upon society, not merely provoked us to a merry laugh, but was found to be a more efficient corrector of folly and wickedness, than Papal Bulls, Koyal Decrees, or Acts of Parliament. The lecturer stated that he had devoted several years to the pre- paration of his lectures, and the numerous illustrations. He clearly pointed out and illustrated by his original designs the difference between comic art and caricature, both of which were important auxiliaries to Satire. Many ancient and odd signs were al- luded to, and their meaning explained. He was very happy in tracing the transitions from ideal beauty into character, from character to caricature, and from caricature into the grotesque. Fac-similes of numerous rare old MSS. were exhibited, and copies of curious old wood cuts, made by permission from the originals in the possession of Mr. Hawkins, and other private collectors. The political points which had provoked the satirical attacks on Walpole, AVilkes, Pitt, and their contemporaries, were revived in the many graphic satires selected. The drawings are all large, to be seen at a distance, and are very carefully done. The lecture was delivered with great distinctness and humour. It is evident that the lectures have been got up with great research and care. To say that the entertainment was amusing throughout, would, though true, be not sayins enougli ; for indeed it was full of points of great political and biographical interest from beginning to end. 2 Preston Chronicle and Lancashire Advertiser, Nov. 12, Mr. It. W. Buss, the painter of the picture, so well known by the popular engraving of it, of James Watt's first experiment on Steam, has lately been delivering a scries of four lectures on "Comic and Satiric Art." Mr. Buss Is himself an etcher of humorous sub- jects of no mean order, and he has taken up the history of humorous art con amore. He traces the act of caricature In England from its beginning down to the present time— gives one at least, sometimes as many as twenty examples, of the different artists who have obtained a reputation in this department of art. Those who have not yet made the subject their study will be agreeably surprised to find how largely a knowledge of its main features contributes to the elucidation of the history of our own country. An abler or more amusing exponent of this history than Mr. Buss, could not be easily found. Manchester Examiner and Times, Nov. 23, 1853. Lectures of Mr. K. W. Bum on Comic Art.— The course of four lectures, on the History and Progress of "English Comic and Satiric Art," delivered by Mr. K. W. Buss, at the Mechanics' Institution, began on Monday afternoon, the first lecture being given at two o'clock, and repeated to a popular audience at eight o'clock in the evening. It WUS pleasingly Illustrated by means of numerous magnified copies of the pictures, en- gravings, or other specimens of art to which the lecturer directed attention. Mr. Buss divided the early specimens generally, into the two classes of unintentional and inten- tional caricature. Among the former he showed the hideous idols of savage I'acific ocean islanders ; the distortions of the human body, caused by pernicious fashions ; he included also the rude productions of incipient art and Illuminated MSS. done by monkish scribes in the middle ages. With the commencement of the Reformation contest, began the more general use of pictorial satire, as a weapon of party warfare. A great many inventions, of an allegorical kind, were exhibited, equally instructive and entertaining. The caricatures on Cromwell and Fairfax, on the one hand, and those directed against James II, and the Pretender on the other, suggest the most interesting reflections that can occur in the study of that critical epoch of our English history. Mr. Buss's second lecture will Include the times of the three Georges, and our pictorial Shakspere— at least the Shakspere of ordinary life — William Hogarth. Manchester Guardian, Nov. 23, 1853. Lectures on Comic and Satiric Art.— On Monday afternoon, and again on the same evening, Mr. It. W. Buss delivered in the lecture theatre of the Mechanics' Insti- tution, Cowper Street, the first of a course of four lectures on "English Comic and Satiric Art." After stating the reasons which had induced him to undertake this course of lectures, the principal of which was a desire to vindicate comic art from the imputation of caricature, and describing the aim of satire, whether of the pen or pencil, to be to restrain the vices and follies of all classes of society ; Mr. Buss explained the derivation of the word caricature, and exhibited a great number of caricatures, some of which had been copied from old MSS. and others had been published at various times between the invention of printing and the reign of Queen Anne. They Included copies of prints published in England at the time of the Reformation, the Civil Wars, the Resto- ration, and the Revolution of 1088. The lecture was very favourably received. Manchester Guardian, Nov. 30, 1853. Lectures on Comic and Satiric Art.— On Friday evening, Mr. It. W. Buss, de- livered in the lecture theatre of the Mechanics' Institution, the second of his course of four lectures, on " English Comic and Satiric Art." In this lecture, Mr. Buss continued his notice of caricatures, and traced them from the Revolution of 1688 to the death of Hogarth. The third lecture was delivered on Monday evening, and included notices of Caricatures and caricaturists from James Gillray to George Crulkshank. The cari- caturists whose works were noted, wero Gillray, Captain Grose, (author of the only- practical work on caricature). James Saver, Itowiandson, Woodward, Isaac Crulkshank, and George Cruikshank. Both these lectures were abundantly illustrated with copies of the caricatures referred to, or portions selected from them, and they were both well received by numerous audiences. The Western Courier. DEvosroRT Mechanics' Institute. Lectures on Caricature Art. The first of these was delivered to a large nudlence.last evening. In this novel subject, as treated by the lecturer, we were surprised at the vast fund of humour stored up In a few private collections of prints executed by our old graphic humourists. This art of caricature, is one thoroughly identified with the peculiarities of John Bull, who growls at and sati- rizes everybody and everything. To the student of history, these lectures are particularly interesting, shedding new light upon important passages of English history ; while In an artistic point of view, there is a mass of Comic and Satiric productions of the pencil, of which, In fact, very few, even of those who have studied the arts, have the remotest conception. The lecture was listened to with marked attention by a very large audience, who frequently expressed their opinion of Its value by hearty rounds of applause. The Sheffield Times, Jan. 28, 1853. As on the occasion of his previous lecture at the Philosophical Institution, Mr. Buss was listened to with deep attention by a discriminating and Intellectual audience, who were evidently delighted with his graphic and pleasing style of description. Leeds Mercury. Leeds Mechanics' Institute and Literary Society. — Mr. E. W. Buss, (the artist) of London, gave, on Monday evening, the first of four lectures on " English Comic and Satiric Art." Mr. Buss's great experience as an illustrator of popular works, enabled him to present a most excellent series of copies from examples of a ludicrous character, whether they derived it from involuntary absurdity or designed ridicule. The lecturer gave a very lucid sketch of the various styles of art, and both defined the proper pro- vince of the graphic satirist, and showed how he could do good service in the cause of common sense, morals, and decorum. Amongst the specimens were two, one which represented a wooden idol from the British Museum, with a most attenuated bit of tim- ber in the place of the waist, and the other a lady of most exact fashion, which excited in the audience a most provokingly ludicrous analogy, and which was cleverly and judiciously improved by Mr. Buss. Leeds Mercury, Jan. 4, 1854. On Wednesday evening Mr. R. W. Buss delivered his fourth lecture on Comic and Satiric Art, the intermediate lectures having been delivered on Saturday and Monday. In his second lecture Mr. Buss arrayed before his audience that masterly series of satiri- cal allegories, which exposed the intrigues of the days of Walpole, Chatham, and Wilkes and those pictorial morals which have immortalized the name of Hogarth. The third lecture did ample Justice to the racy pencil of Gillray and the drollery of Rowlandson, and on Wednesday evening Mr. Buss reviewed the more refined, and, as he believed, not less powerful, productions of cotemporary artists. These lectures have given an admi- rable coup d'leU of the leading events which have been rendered laughable by the graphic satirist during two centuries. The illustrations have been eminently effective. The lecturer's style is vivacious and full of point, and his matter replete with informa- tion, historical and artistic Wakefield Journal and Examiner. Lectures on Comic and Satiric Art. The first of a series of lectures on an entirely novel subject in the arts, at least as far as our experience of art-lectures serves us, was delivered last evening by Mr, R. W. Buss, at the Church Institution in this town, the Vicar in the chair. Of the subject every one who reads history attentively can judge, for, in fact, the art of which Mr. Buss treats is a record of important political events, written down, as it were, by the etching point of the designer of satirical woiks, and familiar to our great grandfathers and their fathers as popular caricatures. The numer- ous preliminary observations, and the comical illustrative drawings with which the lecturer prefaces his history of English Satiric Art, may be considered as an essay on that subject as novel as it is interesting and original. An immense number of enlarged drawings were exhibited during the lecture, all of them copied with scrupulous fidelity from curious MSS. and other authorities, although many of the illustrations of the prin- ciples of caricature were entirely original designs, made by Mr. Buss. The subject is amply illustrated, and described with that humour and zest for comic art which might be expected of the painter of the comic works contributed by him to the London and provincial exhibitions of works of art. During the delivery of the lecture, Mr. Buss was cheered enthusiastically by a very numerous and respectable audience. Wakefield Journal and Examiner, Jan, 2, 1854. Wakefield Church Institution. — Mr. R. W. Buss, of London, delivered his second lecture on English Comic and Satiric Art, last night, at the above institution. The Vicar presided. The subject matter of the second lecture was, if possible, even more in- teresting than that of the previous one. Amongst them was the first caricature, we be- lieve, ever published upon bribery at elections. Hogarth's caricatures succeeded, then Parley's (a new name to us), concluding with the rich works of Bunbury. Mr. Buss has traced the progress of Comic Art and Satire in England with great judgment, by his selecting from a large mass of materialsjmportant specimens, both as regards the artist and the subject, conveying at the same time the exact style of the artist, and a record of some great political or social event, thus rendering these lectures most interesting to the amateur of fine art, as well as to the student of English history. They were atten- tively listened to by numerous audiences, who expressed;!!! the usual manner their obli- gations to Mr. Buss. The Sheffield Times. The first of a series of lectures on Comic and Satiric Art was delivered on Tuesday evening at the Music Hall, before the members of the Sheffield Literary and Philosophi- cal Society, by Mr. R. W. Buss. The lecturer stated that he wished to vindicate comic art from the sneering charge of caricature too frequently brought against it. He then defined ideal beauty, character, caricature, and grotesque, and divided caricature into intentional and unintentional. Of intentional caricature, the lecturer gave instances from Greek and Roman art, and then proceeded to trace its rise and progress in England, beginning at a time antecedent to the invention of printing, and tracing it down to the reigns of the Georges. The lecturer, who was listened to with much attention by a select and highly respectable audience, concluded amidst applause. His remarks were illustrated by an extensive series of drawings, many of which are taken from very scarce works. 4 Leeds Times, January 28, 1854. Leeds Mechanics' Institution and Literary Society. — Mr. Buss, well known from a variety of clever productions as a painter and illustrator of popular works, is now giving four lectures on Humorous and Satiric Art ; tlie first of wliich was delivered to a crowded room on Monday last. In discriminating between the several kinds of Art, Mr. ISuss save a good scientific classification of their aims and attributes. Journal of the Society of Arts, Feb. 17, 1854. Mr. It. W. Buss, the artist, lias been giving his four lectures on Humorous and Satiric Art, with great eclat at the Leeds Mechanics' Institution and Literary Society. The idea of e xamining this branch of Art, which in a certain sense, is truly historical, both aestheti- cally, and in relation to the events the several sketches introduced in illustration are de- signed to render ludicrous, has a great deal of originality, and, as developed by Mr. Buss, yielded much instruction, both as regards the principles of art, and its use as a powerful corrective of vice, affectation, and folly. Art Journal, Feb. 1845. Mr. R. W. Buss, the painter of humorous pictures, has recently enrolled himself on the list of public lectures, by delivering a series of Essays on " Comic and Satiric Art in England," from the earliest period to the present time ; illustrated by examples of I lie styles of the great caricaturis's Gillray, Rowlandson, G. Cruikshanlc, &c, &c. Thts ■ lectures have been delivered in London, Manchester, Sheffield, Leeds, Wakefield, Plymouth, Devonport, and Exeter, and at Wimpole Hall, before a large party, guests of the Earl of Hardwicke. The subject he has taken in hand is one that is very amusing, and not uninstructive. The Sheffield Free Press. On Tuesday evening Ii. W. Buss, Esq., delivered, at the Music Hall, Sheffield, before the members of the Literary and Philosophical Society, the first of a series of four lec- tures on Comic and Satiric Art. There was a numerous attendance. The lecture was of a highly interesting character, and illustrated by numerous drawings. Mr. Buss delivered his second lecture on Friday evening. He stated that satire was ably wielded by Pope, Swift, and other great minds, to aid the cause of reform ; and that from thc3e, caricature obtained its political personifications. The first bribery caricature appeared in 1727, on the occasion of the great Whig majority being returned during the ministry of Sir Robert Walpole. In noticing Hogarth's Gin Lane, Beer Street, Beggar's Opera, &c, the lecturer compared that great painter to Charles Dickens, the bosom friend of the multitude, who responded to the efforts of both to elevate and improve them. The lecture was highly interesting. Sheffield Examiner. On Tuesday and Friday evenings in the present week, two lectures on Comic Satiric Art, were delivered in the Music Hall, by R. W. Buss, Esq., of London. The lecturer traced tiie school of Comic and Satiric Art from Gillray to the present time, illustrating his remarks by numerous well executed and graphic illustrations, exhibiting the peculi- arities of all the great masters in this style of art. He concluded a course of interesting and instructive lectures with some well-timed observations on the importance of carica- ture, aud pointed out many instances in which it had proved of the highest service to public morality. The Plymouth and Devonport Weekly Journal. Mr. R. W. Bess on Caricature. On Saturday evening last, R. W. Buss, Esq., deli- vered the first of a course of lectures at the Mechanics' Institute, Plymouth, on the his- tory of Comic and Satiric Art in England, with illustrative exhibitions of Cartoons. The subject was one of a highly interesting character, and must have cost the lecturer a vast deal of time in its preparation, as it was richly illustrated with copies of many of the most famous caricatures of olden time, all of which he graphically described with much of that quaint humour which is so valuable, and really necessary to the right treatment of such a subject. To the literary man and the intelligent reader, these lec- tures are full of interest, for the lecturer has delved in a mine of pictorial wealth ; he has worked with success, and has drawn from almost hidden sources, an immense va- riety of pictorial illustrations of satiric and comic art, such as it has been the good fortune of few persons to have had the pleasure of seeing before. Leeds Intelligencer. Mr. Buss of London, the productions of whose pencd and etching needle are well- known to the readers of many of our popular illustrated works, gave an excellent lecture the first of a course of four, on English Comic and Satiric Art, on Monday evening, at the Mechanic's Institution. The Sheffield Times. Mr. Buss concluded the fourth of his excellent lectures on Comic Art and Caricature, at the Sheffield Literary and Philosophical Society, by an able description of the politicaPfcnd^social importance of caricature. ! AND ITS RELATION TO DIFFERENT STYLES OF Painting, Sculpture, and Engraving A CONTRIBUTION TO THE HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH SCHOOL OF ART THE NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS SELECTED AND DRAWN FROM THE ORIGINALS BY ROBERT WILLIAM BUSS fainter, ^fsigncr, ani> (Etcher AND REPRODUCED BY PHOTO-LITHOGRAPHY PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR BY VIRTUE & CO. For Private Circulation only 1874 ( DEDICATION. / N England it has been, and still is, customary to dedicate, or to inscribe a new production of the pen to Somebody ; that Somebody being most frequently a royal, noble, wealthy, or learned personage. But in the present day " a change has come o'er the scene." This magnificent Somebody has now in a great measure given way to the more humble but affectionate friend of the author, selected from the circle of those most dear to him — a custom so fraught with affection I deem worthy of imitation. My " Somebody'''' I therefore select from that small but dear circle formed by my own childre?i ; and I dedicate this work on English Graphic Satire to my only daughter, Frances Mary. From an early period she has shared my hopes and fears while I was pursuing an arduous and uncertainly remunerated profession. Without her this book, whatever may be its merits or demerits, would have never existed. It tvas "Dear Fanny'''' who, foremost among a large group of kind and admiring friends, urged me to commence the work, and cheered me on to its completion. Therefore to her belongs all that can be fitly and affectionately comprised in a dedication. By an unusual combination of talent and energy she has won for herself an honourable position as an educator. I join my hopes, with those of numerous and attached friends, that her useful life may be prolonged, and that she may be granted health to enjoy it. ROBERT WILLIAM BUSS. 14, Camden Street, Camden Town, London , June 1874. PREFATORY AND EXPLANATORY REMARKS. HIS Essay differs materially from other works similar in title, and with apparently a similar object. The !$ difference consists in the fact, that I have not included political history in my view of the progress of Graphic Satire in England ; nor have I entered upon the antiquarian ground so ably occupied by other writers on this subject. I consider Graphic Satire, or, in the ordinary sense of the term, Caricature, as an important branch of the Fine Arts in this country, however contemptuously an art so popular may • be regarded by some inconsiderate critics. Nor can the history and progress of the English school of art be complete without much more than a mere mention, or slight notice of Satiric Art. I believe no work upon the history of art in England com- prehends any notice whatever of the efforts of artists in Caricature whose talents and energies have at various times exercised a powerful influence on public opinion — indeed, far more so than the works by professors of the grand style of art in their mightiest efforts. Henry Fuseli, a Royal Academician, professor of painting and teacher of drawing at the Royal Academy of England, an undoubtedly great artist, lived with his head so high up in the clouds of poetic and heroic art, that in his lectures on the English vi PRE FA TOR F A ND EXP LAN A TOR Y REM A RES. school he scarcely condescended to notice an artist of such world- wide renown as William Hogarth ! The notice he does give of this great painter is in dispraise of his works, speaking of them as low and vulgar — " mere chronicles of scandal ! " It is curious to mark the contrast of public estimation of works by Fuseli and by Hogarth. Fuseli's works are so repulsive to the general taste that, with all his learning and talent, no picture of his has a place on the walls of our National Gallery. On the other hand, Hogarth and his pictures (he was also a caricaturist) are as household gods to the public, and of all English artists he is the one most known and most esteemed on the Continent and in the New World. Numerous volumes of criticism have been written upon the great dramatic pictures of this truly English painter, whose works have been described by all our celebrated essayists since his time. But Caricature, although of humbler pretensions to art than the works of Hogarth or of England's historical painters, surely deserves some notice. Therefore, as this popular branch of art is disregarded by writers on the English school, the present little work seeks to give this phase of art some consideration. Its object is also to show how Graphic Satire has descended from antiquity to a thoroughly appreciative age in a free country like England, what materials caricaturists had to work with, how those materials were most felicitously employed, how ancient bequests of art have been most ingeniously adapted by modern artists, and how they have superadded invention, composition, light and shade, and a power of drawing far superior to the efforts of the caricaturists of antiquity. Caricature has so wide a range that there is no mode of execu- tion in art that has not at one time or other been employed un it. These various modes of executing caricatures I endeavour to explain, and I give, wherever it is practicable, a fac-simile of the artist's work, line for line, dot for dot. Thus it will be evident that this work differs essentially from all those whose object PREFATORY' AND EXPLANATORY REMARKS. vn is simply to illustrate political events by means of outlines from designs by our celebrated caricaturists. I view the art of Caricature from an artist's stand-point, and criticise efforts in it by the same rules as guide us in our judg- ment of pictures or drawings ; for, after all, Caricature is really the slighter exercise of art by men whose more elabo- rated works have been, and are, duly chronicled in the annals of art. In some cases the peculiar gift of a perception of the ludicrous may induce a painter in oil or water-colours to devote more of his attention to comic and slight productions of the pencil or etching- needle than to pictures. Such is the case with Hogarth, Gillray, George Cruikshank, John Doyle, John Leech, and our present comic artists. This view of the art of Caricature, or " English Comic and Satiric Art," I held many years ago, and, in order to help in popu- larizing it and explaining its art-principles, I prepared a series of four lectures, illustrated by three hundred examples selected from works by our most celebrated Graphic Satirists. These examples were drawn by my own hand on cartoons, each measuring between six and seven feet. There were sixty of these cartoons, which, passing over rollers, were thus displayed behind a hand- some portable frame. The illustrations, being of a large size, were visible to a numerous audience. To avoid confusion in the subjects, all the speeches supposed to be uttered by the intro- duced figures were omitted. The success of these lectures was great, as I had engage- ments at almost every literary and scientific institution in London, its suburbs, and the principal towns in the provinces. Amongst the most gratifying results of my lectures was the fact that they secured me many excellent friends wherever I visited, and that the recollection of my lectures still dwells in their memory. These kind friends have recently urged me to re-deliver my viii PREFATORY AND EXPLANATORY REMARKS. lectures on " English Comic and Satiric Art," now that the mere lapse of time would impart a novelty to the subject. The weight of years and failing health, however, compelled me to decline an invitation so kindly given ; for only those who have travelled hundreds of miles single handed, with two large unwieldy and heavy packing-cases, on a lecturing tour, can appreciate the fatigue and distress of mind caused by the delay, ignorance, inso- lence, and blundering of railway servants, and of stupid country carriers. Nevertheless, a grateful feeling to my excellent friends for repeatedly expressed kindness in regard to my lectures has induced me so far to meet their wishes as to put together in this unpretending book the substance of the four lectures alluded to. Since the delivery of them — more than twenty years ago — changes have taken place. Death has been seriously busy amongst our comic artists ; new aspirants have arisen, and new processes in the arts of engraving and printing have been invented. These changes are described in the present form of my lectures. Again, the greatly reduced size of the illustrations consequent upon the book-form, has enabled me, in numerous instances, to give, by the aid of photography, reproductions of the original caricatures with the utmost fidelity. The process here employed is called photo-lithography. A photographic negative picture is taken from any painting, print, drawing, or original object, and then superposed on a film of gelatine prepared with bichromate of potash, and exposed to the action of light. By a delicate chemical manipulation this film of gelatine is made fit to be transferred to a lithographic stone. That done, the work is nothing more than ordinary lithographic printing. The ink, being the usual printer's ink, remains abso- lutely permanent ; consequently all fear of fading, or sulphurizing, an occurrence too frequent with prints taken upon salts of silver by the usual photographic method, is removed. To produce even such a book as the present one would involve a very large sum of money for the illustrations only, PREFATORY AND EXPLANATORY REMARKS. ix were they reproduced either by wood-engraving or by engraved steel-plates. Photography, and its attendant processes, whether by silver or by carbon, reduce this outlay considerably; still, a great degree of uncertainty prevails, consequent upon English anti-photographic weather, and careless manipulation in fixing and washing all prints taken upon paper prepared with silver. Photo -lithography, while it still more reduces the cost of production, has the great merit of fidelity of detail, rapidity of printing, and unquestionable permanency. Moreover, by its close approximation to the usual appearance of prints for book illustration, the hostility of publishers, and of the public also, to the smoky results of ordinary photography is not provoked. The illustrations to the present book are in some cases taken from photographs of my own, from the original cartoons by myself ; in other cases, from original engravings on wood or metal, and the whole transferred to stone by Mr. Griggs, of Elm House, Peckham, whose photo-lithographic productions are well known in connection with works on East Indian architecture and costume, as well as in various ingenious applications of the above art to general book illustration. The Autotype, Heliotype, Woodbury-type, and other similar processes, have the same object as photo-lithography, namely, to reduce the cost of book-illustrations and to secure absolute fidelity in reproduction. These various ingenious and scientific processes are secured to their inventors by patents, and have certain secrets and peculiar manipulation connected with them necessary to ensure success. The great desideratum in book-illustration and economic printing still remains to be discovered. It is this : a metal block obtained from a photographic nega- tive of any subject whatever, which will work up with type, and print as readily as a wood-engraving when thus mixed. It is only of late years that Caricature, as a record of political b x PREFA TORY AND EXPLANA TORY REM A RES. events, has been taken up by able writers, and public attention thereby drawn to this popular and interesting art, not in London alone, but in most of the great continental cities. Collectors have preserved many specimens of this phase of art. The British Museum folios are indebted to Miss Banks, Mr. Hawkins, Mr. Smith, and some minor contributors, to the general collection. In the Print Room a very curious, extensive, and interesting mass of caricatures has been formed from various sources, such as sales, bequests, and gifts. In addition to these are the works of Hogarth, Sayer, Gillray, Bunbury, George Cruikshank, John Doyle, and John Leech, also Punch, and a quantity of miscellaneous caricatures by artists since the inven- tion of engraving. An enormous mass of satirical prints, broad-sheets, and caricatures in the British Museum remained, till very recently, buried in the departments of printed books, MSS., and that of the prints ; but owing to public attention being directed to the truly popular subject of English Graphic Satire, these are now being gradually brought to light, and an elaborate and voluminous catalogue being prepared by Mr. G. Reid and Mr. Stephens. Any future writer on this subject will find his labours much shortened by this aid ; without it, it was next to impossible to hunt out or to examine the many curious, interesting, and unique examples of Pictorial Satire existing in the Museum Library. In the present work I have consulted all the complete works of English caricaturists, as well as those written by Strutt, Malcolm, J. R. Planche, F.S.A., Thomas Wright, M.A., and occasional contributors to various periodicals ; also the "Catalogue of Satirical Prints," as far as its present state will admit. In addition to the above, many friends, mindful of my former lectures, have presented me with some valuable specimens of Caricature, which have considerably augmented a collection made by me in a long course of years. PREFATORY AND EXPLANATORY REMARKS. xi I beg to offer my best thanks to the officers of the British Museum for their kind assistance and attention to my wishes while I was engaged upon the present Essay. The numerous illustrations to this book require some brief notice, as being the result of a very ingenious, difficult, and delicate process in applied photography. For the purpose of the present book, no other process with which I am acquainted could accomplish what Mr. Griggs has done in this case. Many of the groups have been photographed from the original cartoons made twenty years ago, and, by hard work during my lectures, much torn, creased, and stained ; but, by his care and attention, these defects are removed from the prints. The specimens of etching and line-engraving introduced are absolutely faithful, line for line, dot for dot ; but the process of photo-lithography, like all those in applied photography, being one for surface-printing only, the light grey tones from shallow lines and dry-point, belonging to prints from incised plates, cannot always be obtained ; but the patience, skill, and perseverance Mr. Griggs has brought to bear upon this ingenious process have satisfactorily diminished this difference. This explanation will be readily understood by those of my readers who are acquainted with the details of printing. I have spared neither labour nor research to make this Essay as correct as I possibly could, strictly within the limits assigned to my former lectures. A complete history of the art would, of course, require volumes ; nor can it be thoroughly accomplished until the enormous mass of matter in the British Museum has been examined, arranged, and catalogued. Into the present work some inaccuracies may have crept unperceived by me. Should such exist, I hope they may be excused, as my work has been produced while suffering under a serious and prolonged illness. CONTENTS. FOLIO I. Early Attempts at Delineation by Children and Savages.— Delineation dating from Pre-historic Times. — Greek Fiction of the Origin of Painting. — Modelling in Clay. — The Grotesque in Drawing and in Modelling. — Origin of the Term. — Ornamentation in Architecture. — Ancient Manuscripts. — Heraldic Monstrosities. — Illustrations of the Grotesque from Chinese, Heraldic, Egyptian, Byzantine Examples FOLIO II. Caricature. — Invention and mere Delineation. — Invention of Michael Angelo. — Leonardo da Vinci and Raffaelle. — Grand Art. — Social Art. — Reforms in Society greatly aided by Satire. — Effects of Ridicule. — Laughing Animals. — Fescjnnine Verses. — Satura. — Horace. — Juvenal. — Belief in Metempsychosis. — Natural Features and Dispositions of Men. — Pure Satire not necessarily Comic. — Duelling. — A Satirical Subject by R. W. Buss. — Example of Mezzotinto Engraving. — W. Hogarth and Pure Satire. — Origin of Caricature : the Term Explained. — The Dilettanti, W. Hogarth, and Henry Fielding the Novelist. — Sir George Beaumont and his Dictation to Artists. — Hogarth on Caricature. — Examples of Etching and Illustrations of Caricature, from Leonardo da Vinci, Ghezzi, Raffaelle, and Annibale Caracci. — Hogarth's Explanation. — Fielding's Explanation. — The Bench. — Principles of Caricature. — The Antique, Nature, Caricature. — Caricatures of Pitt and C.J. Fox, after J. Gillray. — Exaggeration of Face, of Figure, illustrated from Gillray's Works 6 CARICATURE DIVIDED INTO INVOLUNTARY OR UNINTENTIONAL, AND VOLUNTARY OR INTENTIONAL. FOLIO III. INVOLUNTARY OR UNINTENTIONAL CARICATURE. Involuntary Caricature. — Illustrations. — Savage and Fashionable Monstrosities. — Classical Monsters. — Christian Monsters. — Bayeux Tapestry. — False Art of Watteau, Boucher, Thornhill, &c. — Stage Dandyism : Mrs. Siddons, J. Wallack, Charles Kean, H. Fuseli, R.A 19 FOLIO IV. VOLUNTARY OR INTENTIONAL CARICATURE. Voluntary or Intentional Caricature from the Earliest Period to the Invention of Printing. — Satire, an Aid to Reforms in Political or Social Matters. — Means of Drawing and Modelling in a Rude State of Society. — Colour. — Egyptian Painting. — True Fresco compared to Tempera. — Pictures on Papyri. — Etruscan Vases. — Dwarfs. — Examples of Caricature. — Original of Punch. — Dark Ages. — Christian Art. — Carvings in Wood and Stone. — Manuscripts. — Tapestry . 29 xiv CONTENTS. FOLIO V. CARICATURE FROM THE INVENTION OF WOOD ENGRAVING TO THAT OF LINE ENGRAVING. PAGE Invention of Printing. — Chinese Origin. — Playing Cards. — Earliest Woodcut. — Value of MSS. — Printing by Gutenberg, Fust, Schceffer and Coster. — Earliest known Political Caricature. — Printing in England by Caxton, Pynson, and Wynkyn de Worde. — Wood Engraving as practised by the Chinese. — Present mode of Preparing the Blocks and of Engraving. — Colouring.— " Tittle Tattle " stencilled 38 FOLIO VI. EARLY CARICATURE IN ENGLAND. Invention of Engraving on Metal. — Nielli. — Thomaso Einneguerra. — Artists of the 15th Century. — First Book published with Prints from Metal Plates. — Pure Graver Work. — Invention of Etching. — Date, 1515, of Earliest Etching. — "Biting In" and "Stopping Out," applied. — Etched Example. — "Batman's Doom," 15 18. — Holbein's "Dance of Death" (facsimile). — Nobody. — Coarse Wood-cuts. — The English in 161 7. — "Mad Fashions," 1642. — W. Hollar, 1626. — James I. — Gunpowder Plot. — Laud. — Charles II. with his Nose to the Grindstone. — J. Callot, 1592. — His Influence on the Art of Etching 42 FOLIO VII. Engravings in Line, and Etchings by Dutch Artists. — Romayn de Hooghe. — Caricatures on Cromwell.— W. Marshall, 1648.— Dutch Hostility.— Admiral Blake.— The Pope and Satan. — Enactments against Caricatures. — Richard Cromwell. — Chailes II. restored. — Charles II. by Gaywood. — England as a Cow. — Whig and Tory. — Death of Charles II., 1685. — Prince Rupert learns Mezzotint from Louis von Siegel. — James II. — The Popish Successor. — Faithorne, 1680. — Landing of the Prince of Orange, November 5, 1688. — Caricatures on Mary of Modena, Father Petre, and the Pretender. — "Peikin's Triumph," by Mosley. — Flight of James II. — His Death in 1 701 52 FOLIO VIII. ENGLISH CARICATURE TO THE DATE OF W. HOGARTH. William and Mary proclaimed King and Queen. — Battle of the Boyne ; Caricatures on it. — Dutch taste introduced in England. — Death of Mary, 1694. — Hemskirk. — Francis le Piper. — Death of William III., 1704. — Accession of Anne. — Dr. Sacheverell. — Scriblerus Club. — History of John Bull. — Death of Anne. — George I., 1 7 14. — Robert Harley. — South Sea Swindle. — Reproduction of Hogarth's Caricature. — Bubble Cards. — Picture by E. M. Ward, R.A.— Picart's Caricature. — Bad Mezzotints used for Caricature . . .64 FOLIO IX. Decline of " The Legitimate Drama " under Charles II. — Amusement and Excitement afforded by Italian Opera, Masquerades, and Pantomimes. — Gay's Beggars' Opera. — Hogarth's Caricature. — Expected Invasion by the Pretender. — Military Fever. — Camp in Hyde Park. — Death of George I., 1727. — Hogarth's Patriotic Caricatures. — Reproduction of Calais Gate. — England and France — Accession of George II. — War with France. — Retirement of Sir Robert Walpole. — " March to Finchky " . 73 FOLIO X. Hogarth's " Gin Lane " (facsimile). — Criticisms on this Work by Charles Lamb and Charles Dickens. — " Beer Street " (facsimile). — "Enraged Musician" (facsimile). — Street Noises. — Errors caused by Ignorance of Perspective (facsimile). — Line of Beauty. — Paul Sandby, R.A. — " The Caricaturist Caricatured " 80 CONTENTS. xv CARICATURE FROM HOGARTH TO GILLRAY. FOLIO XI. PAGE Etchings of Dr. Meagre or St. Andre". — "Tartuffe's Banquet." — Gravelot. — First Caricature on Bribery. — Sir Robert Walpole and George II.— Walpole's Indifference to Ridicule. — King George and the Lion. — Caricatures of G. F. Handel, of Cuzzoni and Farinelli. — John Wilkes, Churchill, Dr. Johnson, Smollett, Lord Chatham, Pope. — Lords Sandwich and Melcombe. — Lord Chatham, his Death. — J. S. Copley's Picture, " Prelude to the Death of the Earl of Chatham " 9' FOLIO XII. W. H. Bunbury, Esq., an amateur : his rich style of caricature. — Commences drawing and etching at Westminster School.— Caricatures the "Dons" at Cambridge. — Travels in Italy and Germany.— His drawings in Pencil, or black or red chalk, engraved in dot and aquatint. — These methods of Engraving described. — Ridicules awkwardness in Riding or Dancing.— Death in 1811. — Portrait of Bunbury.—" Geoffrey Gambado." — Illustrations of his style of Caricature. — James Sayer, born at Great Yarmouth. — Pitt's own Caricaturists. — Feeble Draughtsman. — Etchings very weak. — Pitt gives him four appointments under Government.— Hostility to Fox and his Party. — Attacks the " Coalition." — Examples of his style of Caricature.— French Revolution. — " The Night Mare."— Reproduction of one of his Etchings. — Death of Sayer, 181 1 101 FOLIO XIII. George Darley, caricaturist of fashions. — Rich Comic Vein. — Avoids Political Subjects. — Specimens of his Style. — Monstrous Head-dresses. — Mrs. Cosway — Mrs. Robinson — "The Perdita." — Gambling.— Fribbles. — Beaux and Macaronis. — Their Monstrosities. — The Macaroni Mania. — Foote's Stage Caricatures. — An opening for a Caricaturist of Pitt and his Party. — James Gillray enters the Field of Caricature 108 FOLIO XIV. CARICATURE FROM GILLRAY TO GEORGE CRUIKSHANK. James Gillray, a true Caricaturist, born 1757 at Chelsea. — Apprenticed to a Writing Engraver. — Runs away and joins a Company ot Strolling Players. — Studies at the Royal Academy, and with Bartolozzi. — Draws, Etches, and Engraves with great talent. — Imitates Sayer. — Portrait. — Adopts Caricature as a Profession. — Examples of his Style. — Caricatures Pitt, Dundas, and Lord Thurlow. — " French Liberty and British Slavery." — Reproduction of his Etching for the Anti-Jacobin. — Ridicules Fox and his Supporters. — Sir F. Burdett. — "The Gout." — "The Assessed Taxes." — "Pitt in the Salt-box." — "George III. andBoney." Reproduction of his " Truth.". — Enthusiasm when at Work. — Impending Insanity. — Last Original. Work on William Cobbett. — Last Engraving, "The Barber's Shop," after Bunbury, 181 1. — Attack of Insanity. — Care of Miss Humphrey. — Gillray's Death in 1815. Buried at St. James's Church, Piccadilly 113 FOLIO XV. Mezzotint Engraving erroneously attributed to Prince Rupert. — Adopted by Caricaturists. — This mode of Engraving described. — Caricaturists coeval with Gillray and Rowlandson. — Thomas Rowlandson, bom 1756. — Talented but idle. — Political Caricatures by him. — Reproduction of his Style of Etching. — Fall of Napoleon. — Tinted Drawings by Rowlandson popular. — His Death in 1827. — Caricaturists between Rowlandson and Robert Seymour. — Robert Seymour, born 1798. — Apprenticed to a Pattern Draughtsman. xvi CONTENTS. — Paints "Diablerie" in Oil. — Designs Caricatures for Bell's Life in London and Figaro (the first). — Etches Designs for the Book of Christmas. — Draws on Stone. — Reproduction of Seven Sketches. — " A Volume of Sketches." — Originates the celebrated Pickwick Club. — Sad quarrel with the satirist, Gilbert a Beckett. — Commences the Pickwick Club with Charles Dickens. — Mental Distress and Suicide, 1836 130 FOLIO XVI. CARICATURE FROM GEORGE CRUIKSHANK TO THE REVIVAL OF WOOD ENGRAVING. George Cruikshank, bom 1792. — His artistic career commenced with assisting his father. — Early Caricatures. — Strong Anti-Gallic feeling expressed by all English Caricaturists. — Bitterly satirizes the Prince Regent and the Old Tory Party. — Derrydown Triangle : Old Bags and the Doctor. — Queen's Matrimonial Ladder. — The Dandy of Sixty. — Political House that Jack Built. — Non mi Ricordo. — Political Showman. — Slap at Slop. — Wood Engraving. — His friend, William Hone, tried fur Blasphemy and Sedition. — Abandons Political Caricature and produces numerous capital Etchings on Copper and Drawings on Wood. — "Points of Humour." — "Mornings at Bow Street."- — "Sketches by Boz." — "Life in London." — "Life in Paris." — Etchings for "Oliver Twist," for "Jack Sheppard," " Tower of London," &c. — Facsimile of his style of Etching. — Apostle of Temperance. — Glyphography. — " The Bottle." — "The Triumph of Bacchus." Presented to the National Gallery. — Colonel of a Temperance Corps of Volunteers. — Royal Pension. — Robert Cruikshank. — Percy Cruikshank. — Lithography invented by Sennefelder, r 795— 1798. — Description of the Process. — Adopted by John Doyle, 1830. — Popularity of HB's Sketches. — Mysterious Artist ! — Triumphant career of HB during Twenty Years. — Examples of Life-like Sketches. An elegant Pictorial Record of Political History, from 1829 to 1842 • 143 FOLIO XVII. FROM THE REVIVAL OF WOOD-ENGRAVING TO THE PRESENT TIME, 1 874. Party Questions Quieted. — Serenity of the Political Atmosphere. — Progress of Wood-Engraving under W. Harvey, John Jackson, Orrin Smith, Samuel Williams. — " Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge." — Cheap and Good Literature. — Penny Magazine and similar Periodicals, Published by Charles Knight and John Parker. — Club of Wits and Artists originate Punch. — Rapid Progress in Caricature and Wood-Engraving. — Thomas Hood. — His Rhymes and his Drawings. — Death in 1845. — Figaro (the first).— The Wag. — Punchinello, 1832. — Asmodeus in London. — The Devil in London, 1832. — The Penny Trumpet. — The Schoolmaster at Home, 1832. — The Whig-Dresser. — Paul Pry. — Peeping Tom. — Imitators of Punch. — The Squib. — Puck. — Chat. — Man in the Moon. — Diogenes. — Punchinello (the second). — Judy (the first). — Town Talk. — London. — The Puppet Show. — Will-o'-the-wisp. — Tomahawk. — Judy (the second). — Figaro (the second). — Hornet. — Junius. — Vanity Fair . . . . . . . . . 159 FOLIO XVIII. Fun, a clever Rival to Punch. — Tom Hood, Editor ; Gordon Thomson, E. G. Dalziel, Ernest Griset, Frazer, Caricaturists upon it; Engravers, Brothers Dalziel. — Vanity Fair. — Illustrated by Chromo-Lithography. — The Process Described. — Judy (the second). — Edited by C. H. Ross. — Facsimile of Powerfully drawn Caricatures by W. Bowcher. — "The Ballot-Box." — Stupidity of Voters. — Miss Adelaide Claxton.— H. K. Browne (Phiz). — Beauty in Caricature. — Charles Dickens. — His Influence on his Circle of Artist- Friends. — John Leech.— John Tenniel. — Du Maurier. — H. K. Browne. — Marcus Stone. — Gillray. — Hogarth. — Ugliness not Interesting. — Gordon Thomson. — Fun Almanack for 1873' l6 7 CONTENTS. xvn FOLIO XIX. PAGE John Tenniel.— Reproduction of Clever Cartoons for Punch. — Prize for a Cartoon at "West- minster Hall. — Fresco Picture by Tenniel. — Constant Contributor to Punch. — John Leech. — Reproduction of his Caricatures. — Early connection with Punch. — Capital Comic Designs. — His volume of Sketches. — Early works in BeWs Life in London. — His Death. — Lithography (facsimile), big-headed Portraits in the Hornet introduced. — Lord Selborne. — C. Mathews. — The Tomahawk, very personal. — Matt Morgan. — Wood-engraving with a tint over it, cleverly drawn. — Collapse of the Tomahawk. — Figaro (the second). — Zincography. — Philander Smiff. — Importance of Caricature as a teacher and an exponent of National Freedom 176 Captain Grose, F.S.A., "the Facetious." — His Essay on Caricature. — His Portrait, Rules, and Illustrations of Caricature. — Beauty. — Anachronisms and Contrast contribute to the Ludicrous. — Practice of Hogarth, of Gillray, of George Cruikshank. — Sketches from Memory, and Classifying of Sketches. — Tail-pieces. — The Monopolist, a "Coat Tail- piece," by R. W. Buss. — Reproduction of Mezzotint. — The celebrated "Tail-piece," by Hogarth (facsimile), concluding this "Essay on English Graphic Satire " . . . . 187 FOLIO XX. PRACTICE IN CARICATURE. C LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. GROUP PAGE I. The Grotesque. (Lithography.) 4 II. "Satisfaction!" (Mezzotint.) 13 III. Principles of Caricature. (Etching.) 16 IV. Principles of Caricature. (Tinted Etching.) 17 UNINTENTIONAL CARICATURE. V. Savage Monsters. (Etching.) 21 VI. Classical Monsters. (Etching.) 23 VII. Christian Monsters. (Wood-cuts and Etching.) 24 INTENTIONAL CARICATURE. VIII. Ancient Caricatures. (Drawing.) 34 IX. MSS. and Early Caricatures. (Wood Engraving.) 37 X. Time Carrying off the Pope. (Graver Work.) 43 XI. " Batman's Doom." (Etching.) 45 XII. Early Caricatures. (Wood Engraving and Etching.) .... 47 XIII. Caricatures on Cromwell. (Etching.) 56 XIV. Caricatures on the Stuarts. (Etching.) 61 XV. South Sea Bubble. (Hogarth. Etching.) 70 XVI. The Beggars' Opera. (Hogarth. Etching.) 75 XVII. "O! the Roast Beef of Old England!" (Hogarth. Line Engraving.) 76 XVIII. England. (Hogarth. Etching.) 77 XIX. France. (Hogarth. Etching.) 78 XX. Gin Lane. (Hogarth. Line Engraving.) 80 XXI. Beer Street. (Hogarth. Line Engraving.) 82 XXII. The Enraged Musician. (Hogarth. Line Engraving.) .... 83 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. xix OBOUP YkQ-Z XXIII. Errors in Perspective. (Hogarth. Line Engraving.) .... 85 XXIV. Caricatures on Hogarth. (Etching.) 87 XXV. Etchings by Gravelot. (?) 9 1 XXVI. Caricatures by Hogarth : Goupy, Lady Burlington, Hon. G. Townshend. (Etchings.) 93 XXVII. Designs by W. H. Bunbury, Esq. (Etching) 103 XXVIII. Caricatures by J. Sayer. (Etchings.) 104 XXIX. The Nightmare. (Facsimile of Sayer's style of Etching.) . . . .106 XXX. Macaronis, by G. Darley. (Etching.) 108 XXXI. Political Caricatures and Portrait by James Gillray. (Etching.) . 116 XXXII. Political Caricatures by Gillray. (Etching.)' 120 XXXIII. "The Gout," "Assessed Taxes," "Pitt in the Salt-Box," &c, by Gillray. (Etching.) 123 XXXIV. Truth. (Facsimile of Gillray's Etching.) 125 XXXV. Doublures. (Facsimile of Gillray's Etching.) 126 XXXVI. Large Example of Gillray's Etching for the " Anti- Jacobin Magazine." (Facsimile.) 126 XXXVII. Large Etching by T. Rowlandson for the " Anti- Jacobin Magazine." (Facsimile.) 134 XXXVIII. Two Illustrations to "Tom Jones." (Facsimile of Rowlandson's style of Etching.) 135 XXXIX. Political Subjects selected from Rowlandson's Caricatures. (Etching.) 135 XL. "Facsimile" Examples of Robert Seymour's Caricatures. (Litho- graphy 140 XLI. "Facsimile" Examples of Robert Seymour's Caricatures. (Litho- graphy.) 141 XLII. Political Caricatures by George Cruikshank, with Early Portrait. (Wood Engraving.) 145 XLIII. " Ignorance is Bliss," — the Boulogne Steamer, by G. Cruikshank. (Etching.) .... 148 XLIV. Two Subjects from "the Bottle," by G. Cruikshank. (Facsimile examples of Glyphography.) 150 XLV. Two Examples of G. Cruikshank's Drawing on Wood for "the House that Jack Built; " also a Recent Portrait of G. Cruik- shank. (Lithography and Wood Engraving.) 151 XLVI. Two Political Sketches by HB (John Doyle) : Lord J. Russell, D. O'Connell, Right Hon. B. Disraeli and John Bull. (Litho- graphy.) 155 XLVII. Dan O'Connell between Wilkes and Lovat, by HB. (Lithography.) . 157 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. GROUP PAGK XL VIII. Grotesque Designs by Thomas Hood. (Wood Engraving.) . . . 162 XLIX. Mr. Forster, Duke of Argyll, by Ape (A. Perugino). (Chromo- Lithography.) 167 L. Two Caricatures for "Judy," by W. Bowcher. (Wood Engraving.) 169 LI. Examples of Beauty in Caricatures. (Wood Engraving.) . . .170 LII. Political Caricatures by G. Thomson. (Wood Engraving.) . . 172 LIII. Political Caricatures by Tenniel. (Wood Engraving.) . . .176 LIV. Political Caricatures by John Leech. (Wood Engraving.) . . 179 LV. Lord Selborne, C. Matthews. (Lithography.) " The Real Guardian of the Poor," Matt. Morgan. (Wood Engraving.) .... 183 LVI. Captain Grose's Rules for Drawing Caricatures. (Etching.) . 187 LVII. " The Monopolist," " A Coat-tail Piece," by R. W. Buss. (Mezzotint.) 193 LVIII. Hogarth's "Tail Piece," Finis! (Facsimile Etching.) ... 193 These groups contain above two hundred and fifty examples of Caricature, showing the various methods in use from the earliest to the present time. ERRATA. Page 9, line 29, for "satire art" read "satiric art." Page 34 should have Group 8 of the Illustrations. Page 6o, line 22, for '"urn" read '"em." Page 112, line 17, for "raise" read "rise in." Page 157, Illustration 47, for "B" read "IB." Page 166, bottom line, /^r "years" read "months." Page 167, in the contents of Folio xviii. omit " Marcus Stone." Page 168, in Illustration 49, read "(A. Pe)rugino." FOLIO r. Early Attempts at Delineation by Children and Savages. — Delineation dating from Pre-historic Times. — Greek Fiction of the Origin of Painting. — Modelling in Clay. — The Grotesque in Drawing and in Modelling. — Origin of the Term. — Ornamentation in Architecture. — Ancient Manuscripts.— Heraldic Monstrosities. — Illustrations of the Grotesque on Group 1st from Chinese, Heraldic, Egyptian, Byzantine Examples. NY one possessing the least habit of observation must have frequently noticed the rude scrawlings of children ; either in books, or on slates, on walls, or on the smooth pavements. This is nothing more than the manifesta- tion of that imitative faculty which all children possess, in a greater or lesser degree. Merely to scrawl some distant resemblance to the human form does not of itself indicate a particular talent for drawing, any more than speaking indicates a talent for oratory. Doubtless, the very first efforts of children are about alike in point of talent ; it is in after efforts that the latent Giotto or Hogarth is revealed. Unless the mind is in advance of the hand, no improvement can take place, and the subsequent scrawlings of the child approach no nearer to truth of resemblance than those at the outset. The rude drawings by savages are of this kind, as regards the expression of human or animal forms ; but in ornamentation they appear to manifest talent of a better sort ; for while the human form is sadly distorted, a surprising degree of variety and symmetry is to be found in the ornamenting of canoe-paddles, war- clubs, and such instruments, whether of wood, of bone, of shell, or of stone. A visit to our museums and an examination — even a slight one — of the war weapons, and other instruments, produced by what we call savage nations, will convince any inquirer of the truth of these observations. A slight advance upon the childish efforts in art is found in the drawings and sculpture of savage nations, whose powers in B 2 AN ESSAF ON this rude, but seriously intended art, are displayed in their idols, and in their leathern articles, whether intended for dress, or for tents, or any other purposes. So universal is this imitative faculty that very few places on the face of the earth have been found by travellers entirely destitute of attempts at painting or sculpture, rude as the art may be. At the Royal Academy dinner, May 1873, Professor Owen, when returning thanks for the toast " The Prosperity of Science," stated it had been recently discovered that a certain amount of art existed in pre-historic times, for sketches of heads of rein- deer had been found done on the reindeer's antlers; and more curious still, a sketch of the mammoth with his long hair, traced in the same way. These efforts at delineation must have been made centuries before the age of Homer or of Agamemnon, and demolish entirely that beautiful fiction invented by the Greek poets of the origin of the art of painting, which according to them, and on the authority of Pliny, is attributable to a beauteous maiden named Corinthia, a native of Sicyone. She being in love with a certain youth, and finding him asleep near a lamp that was burning, saw that the shadow of his face, which appeared on the wall, was so like the beloved face, that she traced the outline, and thus produced a portrait of her lover. The painter is continually doomed to disappointment by these pretty stories in history proving to be, on investigation, mere fictions. But the Greeks aimed at monopolizing all the virtues and all the arts of man, and cast such beautiful veils of poetry over everything, that it is a source of regret to find how baseless are these poetical figments, when inquired into. Much the same are the grand historical sayings and doings handed down to us with an air of authen- ticity ; on inquiry they are found to have existed only in the fertile imagination of a romancing historian. A step in advance from the rude scrawlings of a child, or a mere savage, would be the imitation of the forms of objects in nature, so as to express particular wants by delineation of these objects, in the absence of a knowledge of writing. In this way drawing or painting has been applied by various peoples from the earliest times for the expression of their wishes. So also with sculpture. A lump of plastic clay in the untutored hands of a child or a barbarian would even by chance manipulation assume forms more or less resembling human or animal forms. The natural shapes of rocks, clouds, mount- ains, blocks of stone, or stunted trunks of trees frequently partake ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 3 of some resemblance to the human form, and might undoubtedly suggest the endeavour to produce at pleasure similar results. Efforts of this kind, necessarily rude, are nevertheless the originators of a higher development of art, such as we see in the nations of the civilised part of the world. But at all times, and however high may be the state of art, there has been, and always must be, a rude state of art running parallel with its highest development, just as infants are born, while mature and aged manhood exist. Rude art, either adapted to represent men or animals, or combining different parts of animal and human forms, would arise, as a desire for ornamentation increased. Such monstrous combinations with no satiric aim at all, but conceived in a really serious and religious sense, have been found in all ages, and are properly designated and classified amongst gro- tesque objects. The Grotesque. Group r. The similarity already alluded to, found in natural blocks of stone, rocks, stalactites, stalagmites, old stumps of trees, and their gnarled trunks, to particular forms of the human being or those of animals, must in all ages have attracted man's observation. Caves and secluded places, whether affording shelter to man from the fury of a storm, or offering cool retreats to him from the scorching rays of the sun, would, especially in a rude state of society, be much visited, if indeed they were not permanently adopted as dwelling-places. Thus those suggestive natural forms would in time be imitated, and certain incongruous combinations be the result. In this way a man's head might appear to be joined to the massive trunk of some animal, such as that of a bull, or of a lion, or an elephant, just as the natural forms might chance to be, and just as the imaginative power of the spectator might be exercised at the time. Such places of retreat, whether natural or artificial, are called " Grots," or " Grottoes," from the French word " Grotte," or Italian " Grotta ; " thence by a common method of termination, "Grotesque" is easily obtained. The term " Grotesque " then is employed to denote any effort of art with odd or monstrous combinations of form, resembling in any degree those curious assemblages of forms, found by chance in caves or grottoes. It has often happened that Nature's curious work has been imitated in artificially constructed grottoes, wherein the ornaments 4 AN ESS A Y ON have been of a monstrous kind, rude or elegant, according to the means and art-education of the owner. Such ornamentation is also called grotesque. Thus we see that any naturally impossible combination of forms may be classed with the grotesque. Examples of these grotesques may be found in the works of painters and sculptors, and abound in ancient Gothic cathedrals amongst the carvings of the stalls, and such parts as are susceptible of ornamentation, while the illuminated manuscripts of all ages teem with grotesque ornaments. Heraldry, with its pompous nonsense, as it appears to us in the present day, is the great field for grotesque subjects. Here we have fish, flesh, and fowl mixed up in the most absurd manner possible, besides monstrosities that never existed except in the brain of an insane herald. Wyvernes, griffins, dragons, are here capering and leaping about in impossible attitudes, in company with unicorns, lions, tigers, leopards, wild cats, and foxes. As if in ridicule of the herald's imaginings, we find in the works of Callot, Delia Bella, Peter Breughel, and Teniers the most heterogeneous assemblages of forms, all pure grotesque, but intended to be "diabolic." In Peter Breughel's "Tempta- tion of St. Anthony" are demons which could be created only by a wildly grotesque imagination revelling in funny absurdity. One of his designs consists of a horse's head stuck upon a pair of human legs, which are encased in armour. A man crawling spider-like by means of his hands and feet, aided by supplemental legs, is another instance. Teniers has cats, dogs, bats, and monkeys, in all imaginable attitudes ; horses' skulls joined to a rhinoceros's body ; skele- tons, and all sorts of queer "joint-stock companions," to tempt poor old St. Anthony, and to terrify him. Grotesques such as these have supplied the popular periodical Punch, as well as other comic works, with ideas for the initial letters used in their various witty articles. At the same time, the grotesque ornamentations found in ancient illuminated manuscripts have suggested the ornamental title-pages and marginal designs in the above, and for numerous other illustrated books of the present day. One of the most recent examples of the grotesque is afforded by an amusing work neatly drawn in pencil by Mr. E. W. Cooke, R.A., and beautifully reproduced by the process patented by the Autotype Company. In this curious work are found the GROUP 1. (Page J^. DRAWN AND ETCHED BY R. W. BUSS. GROTESQUE. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 5 most extraordinary combinations of fish, flesh, and fowl, joined in such a ridiculous, and yet, to a certain extent, scientific manner, as to surprise all who have not studied the grotesques of monkish illuminators and the old masters in art. The illustrations on Group i. are given as examples of the grotesque. The large shield is copied from one designed by a Chinese artist, and borne by Chinese warriors. It is suffi- ciently ugly and extraordinary to produce risibility, but not to make our "Jack Tars" take to their heels in a terrible fright, even when aided by the clashing of swords and frantic yells of the Chinese " braves." Our "Jacks," on the contrary, caught these tremendous "braves," and tied together four or five of them tightly by their long tails, thus securing the celestials as prisoners. On each side is a monstrous combina- tion of man and fish fighting each other in the water. These examples are selected from a MS. in the Harleian Collection at the British Museum. Below is an ornament copied from an illumination in another ancient manuscript also in the British Museum (Harleian MS.) A cat and a hawk are joined together by the tails, with a grinning mask between them. The bird has a monk's head, and may be a portrait of the Superior of the ecclesiastical fraternity to which the waggish illuminator be- longed, while the cat bears a suspicion of being a sly hit at some lady greatly admired by the worthy abbot, but of a capri- cious and quarrelsome temper. The various heads beneath are copied from Egyptian mummies or embalmed animals in the antiquities at the British Museum. The curious male and female figures are of Byzantine date, and become grotesque from the monstrous heads and diminutive limbs, added to a general feeble execution of the sculptured group. Above are two heraldic animals, the unicorn and the wyverne. The unicorn, so familiar to us in our national coat-of-arms, appears to have a very ancient origin, as well as his companion, the lion, for in Mr. Wright's interesting history of the "grotesque" we find them comfortably seated playing at chess, — delineated by an ancient Egyptian artist, on a papyrus now preserved in the British Museum. These remarks and the illustrations given will enable the reader to classify properly drawings of this kind. It sometimes happens that the comic designer strays into the grotesque when national personification is required, this being for the most part symbolical. Such as the lion for England ; the Gallic cock for France ; the eagles, single and double, 6 AN ESSAY ON ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. for Germany and Austria, while the Polar bear is awarded to Russia. When Hanover became annexed to the British Empire, this nationality was represented by a white horse, galloping at full speed, and drawn in various extraordinary attitudes — accord- ing to the caricatures of the day, many of which are strongly suggestive of Jacobite tendencies. FOLIO II. Caricature. — Invention and mere Delineation. — Invention of Michael Angelo. — Leonardo da Vinci and Raffaelle. — Grand Art. — Social Art. — Reforms in Society greatly aided by Satire. — Effects of Ridicule. — Laughing Animals. — Fescennine Verses. — Satura.— Horace. — Juvenal. — Belief in Metempsychosis. — Natural Features and Dispositions of Men. — Pure Satire not necessarily Comic. — Duelling. — Illustration on Group 2nd.— A Satirical Subject by R. W. Buss. — Example of Mezzotinto Engraving. — W. Hogarth and Pure Satire. — Origin of Caricature : the Term Explained. — The Dilettanti, W. Hogarth, and Henry Fielding the Novelist. — Sir George Beaumont and his Dictation to Artists. — Hogarth on Caricature on Group 3rd. — Examples of Etching and Illustrations of Caricature, from Leonardo da Vinci, Ghezzi, Raffaelle, and Annibale Caracci. — Hogarth's Explanation.— Fielding's Explanation. — The Bench, Group 3rd. — Principles of Caricature. — Group 4. The Antique, Nature, Caricature. — Caricatures of Pitt and C. J. Fox, after J. Gillray. — Exaggeration of Face, of Figure, illustrated from Gillray's Works. AVING disposed of the senseless scrawlings of children and the closely allied feeble attempts at delineation by the ignorant savage ; also of those whimsical and ' capricious combinations produced by the pencils of trained artists, by putting them into the class of Gro- :sque ; we are now enabled to enter upon the consideration f the art displayed in, and the object of, that highly popular branch of the fine arts called Caricature. Design or drawing being an effort to delineate the apparent forms of man, animals, or inanimate objects, in its simplest aspect, does not aim at more than the mere representation of such objects. When, however, numerous efforts have been made, the eye has repeatedly examined these natural forms, and become familiar with them. Concurrently the hand has received a certain amount of training. Then the state of the representative art in the juvenile student has greatly advanced, and the truth of resemblance is much closer than heretofore. At this point the majority of art-amateurs stop ; they are like a person able to write, that is, to trace the written character, but wanting inven- tion or imagination upon which these written characters may be employed. To invent, to imagine incidents or events, capable AN ESSAF ON of being presented to the eye by delineation on a flat surface, is an important step in art, from the mere representation of the forms of objects. This invention is an active agent in the mind of an art- student, and of the utmost importance to him, for without this faculty the power of reproducing images or scenes once presented to the mind through the eye cannot exist. The power of reproducing events by the "mind's eye" is called invention. It is invention that gives importance to the works of the great masters in art ; and according to its mental excellence and facility, stamps the possessor as a man of genius. This quality it is which elevates the educated artist above the rude and savage delineator of mere outward form. By selecting and combining natural forms in harmonious compositions, the artist creates new sources of enjoyment for himself and for his fellow-men. This power of re-creating events it is which has justly elevated the art of design, or of painting, to the high position it occupies in civilised nations. Invention, however, is compounded of memory, of imagina- tion, and of judgment, the latter quality controlling the two former. In the works of the greatest masters, such as Michael Angelo, Raffaelle, Leonardo da Vinci, Rubens, Titian, Flaxman, and of other great artists, ancient and modern, we see this faculty of invention fully displayed. The true occupation of the artist is to delight, to interest, and to elevate the mind of man. Such object is properly sought in the representing of subjects drawn from sacred sources, or from the great events of history, or poetry, which require the most exalted taste and skill to convey the peculiar sentiments intended to be inculcated, in a manner corresponding to the dignity of the subject selected. Such are the wonderful inventions of Michael Angelo in the Sistine Chapel, of Raffaelle in the Vatican, and in the cartoons, and of Rubens in his great work, illustrating the marriage of Henri Ouatre with Marie de Medicis, now in the Louvre at Paris. The amateur or art-student may verify for himself these propositions, as at the Kensington Museum of Art are reproductions in photography of these intellectual treasures from the Sistine Chapel and other art sources. Over these the advanced lover of art may pore, and with the greatest ease minutely examine, and connect these mighty productions in a regular series, in a manner far more agreeable and effective than in an exceedingly uncomfortable examination of the great originals in Rome. Here, by means of photography, the student ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 9 may appreciate the intense depth of thought and feeling- infused by Michael Angelo into these works, and rendered with a gigantic power of drawing. The object of these pictures is to display the system of the divine government of the world from its creation, with that also of the elements which surround and uphold it, to its final destruc- tion ; including the conduct and eternal fate of man as deduced from the sacred records and understood by Christians, a theme so elevated as to be parallel only to the great poems of Dante and of Milton. The Museum at Kensington possesses the original cartoons of Raffaelle, and excellent copies of his works in the Vatican, which sufficiently attest the intellectual elevation attained by the " Divine Raffaelle." The legitimate objects of art are, however, not confined necessarily to the sublime efforts of these and other great artists, but a style of art more closely allied to the feelings, events, and imagery of common life is highly to be esteemed and admired, exciting, as it does, emotions at once amiable and agreeable by the display of parental or social affection, and of pure and inno- cent enjoyment. Such is the aim of the numerous easel-pictures and designs contributed to the annual displays of modern art in the great capitals of Europe and America. Thus it appears that the true artist aspires to be a teacher of his fellow-mortals. This legitimate and laudable aspiration may, however, be effected by a class of art which adopts the agency of ridicule and satire to the exposition of the follies of fashion, the indulgences of vice, or the more agreeable display of virtuous conduct. Such is the intention of comic and satire art, ex- emplified in England by the works of Hogarth, Collett, North- cote, Wilkie, G. Cruikshank, Rippingille, E. M. Ward, R.A., W. P. Frith, R.A., and many of the excellent artists of the present day. This latter department of art is also in close connection with that slighter style called caricature, for most comic painters now, as in former times, wield the etching needle, as well as the brush. Their lighter and more rapid productions are caricatures evoked by passing events, while their elaborated compositions are devoted to placing on canvas, by the aid of colour, events of a more important and permanent character. The very nature of the subjects often requires materials low in character, yet, by humour and pathos, they become admirable by their application to moral purposes ; examples of this are to be c AX ESS A IT OX found in the works of William Hogarth, of Wilkie, and of nume- rous artists of the English school. It is a great mistake to sup- pose that the representation of persons in the lower ranks of life constitutes caricature. True tragic feeling may be displayed by a man in a fustian coat as powerfully as by a nobleman clad in velvet. Hood takes a poor starving seamstress for the subject of his " Song of the Shirt." A dead pauper "rattled over the stones" is the ignoble theme chosen by Hood for the " Pauper's Funeral." Yet tragic feeling is preserved in these celebrated poems. At all times and in all ages there are existing ample proofs of the desire and the fact of ridicule being exercised freely by mankind. From the rudest state of society to that of the most polished, a tendency to ridicule and a love of it appear to have existed. Not only has the humorous vein been indulged in by those individuals who possess a keen sense of the ludicrous, but a corre- sponding sensitiveness to ridicule on the part of the object of it has been found, giving rise too frequently to personal encounters of a deadly nature, still existing under the name of duelling. Catlin, the Indian traveller, and illustrator by pen and pencil of the native American Indians, relates that, having painted a chief in profile, an ill-natured but witty fellow-chief said the sitter was only half a man, for the painter had been too true in thus repre- senting him. This sarcasm on a savage warrior was instantly resented by the wit being called out. A duel fought with loaded rifles left the wit dead on the field. In rude ages, the chieftain and his ruder warriors indulged in sarcasms and jokes upon their enemies or their dependants for their mental or physical weaknesses ; in fact, ridicule is so in- herent in mankind that it must have existed in the first family circle. Ridicule indulged in by the King of France at the cor- pulence of William the Conqueror provoked a war with that country, and the death of William. Laughter has ever been considered as a necessary element in human enjoyment ; and why not ? seeing that mankind is the only portion of the Almighty's works furnished with the efficient muscular apparatus for this especial purpose. The gift of speech and the power of laughing constitute man's superiority over our great Simian progenitor so scientifically described by Mr. Darwin. It may be objected here that animals do laugh. The keeper of the hyaenas at the Zoological Gardens would maintain that the horrible noise made by these repulsive animals is a veritable cachinnation ; but such hilarity, however, would be far from cheer- ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. ing to the ears of a traveller. Horses are said proverbially to laugh ; in old pictures and prints there is a comic risible expres- sion represented very frequently, it may be admitted ; but whoever really saw a horse laugh ? Again, a cat is said to laugh ; cats, in nature, are certainly not much given to risibility. Monkeys make a noise which even Darwinian love for the Simian quad- ruped cannot really be called laughing, though the antics of this libel on mankind never fail to cause laughter. This faculty of laughing, therefore, being pre-eminently the property of man, has been employed variously in all ages. As a mere innocent pastime, pleasantries have been indulged in, even in the most loving circles. Ridicule has been employed to warn indi- viduals of any ludicrous habit or vicious indulgence, and thus has assumed a didactic aspect. Too often ridicule has been employed in a malignant feeling, merely to give pain to its object. The agent in these different states of feeling has been named " satire." Fescennine verses are the originators of satirical works. On the occurrence of the festivals of Ceres and Bacchus, certain pantomimists amused the people with a coarse kind of per- formance wherein verses indulging in great licence were repeated or sung. Such verses, from being brought from Fescennia, in Etruria, were called Fescennine. This species of composition has prevailed in Italy from the earliest times to the present day, and is indulged in at various festivals, but especially at the time of the vintage. This rude extempore versification had no dramatic construction, but was simply an effusion of verse by the satirists, having no other qualities but raillery and fun at the expense of their neighbours. Such productions also were called " satum" or " satira" a word signifying a collection of various things, of food composed of various ingredients, and it was also applied to such laws as consisted of many enactments of a different nature. The object of these rough verses by the peasantry was to ridicule each other, and that not in the most delicate way possible. In the course of time such species of poetry became peculiar to the Romans, and was successfully cultivated by Ennius, whose works, written on a variety of subjects, and in many different metres, were therefore called satires. Lucilius was the first writer who constructed satire upon true principles ; in his works he not only satirises the vices and follies of men in general, but frequently private individuals. They formed the model on which Horace wrote his satires. By Horace the foibles and follies of mankind are attacked in a style of playful raillery. AN ESSAY ON Juvenal's satires are of a more severe and vigorous character, provoked by the corruption of morals under the early emperors, and the cruel punishments inflicted by Domitian on the wise and good. The object of such efforts of art is to hold up to ridicule certain vices or follies ; being similar to that of the Roman satirists, the term thus became permanently established in the language of art, and satiric pictures have been produced by numerous artists, but by none so completely and so felicitously as by William Hogarth. Juvenal by his pen, and Hogarth by his pencil, chastised vice with severity, and at the same time encouraged virtue ; both also lie open to the objection of descending too minutely into the details of vice, although with a virtuous intention. In this pictorial satire the persons represented are drawn true to the life, such as we find in the works of our classical authors, and in our comedy. The satire consists in the ludicrous nature of the scenes in which they move, and the incongruous actions in which the figures are engaged. Of personal exaggeration there is very little, not more than we find in Shakspere's comedies or in Dickens's novels ; in fact, this pictorial satire, like dramatic satire, has for its object " to hold the mirror up to nature," and " to shoot folly as she flies ;" therefore, the more truthful the picture, drama, or novel may be in the representation of the personages employed, the more completely will this object be accomplished. Truth of representation may be adhered to, and yet the satire be strong and biting, for Nature herself in numerous instances anticipates the satirist, by presenting us with men and women whose features and figure resemble those of animals to such a degree as to suggest the possibility of the "transmigration of souls." This belief in the metempsychosis has been greatly aided, if not originated, by the correspondence of features and actions found in mankind. We all, in the circle of our acquaint- ances and friends, can cite instances of this animal resemblance. A thick-set, bull-necked, broad-faced man may be a brave struggler with the adverse waves in life, a great and profound author, a celebrated mathematician, or a prize-fighter, with the soul of a bull. A thin-faced, sly man, with a cruel expression, may be a cynical author, a savage critic, a swindler, or a murderer, with the soul of a tiger or a cat. A long-nosed face, with large slanting eyes and furtive expression, may represent a clever anonymous satirist, or an amateur in petty larceny, with the soul of a fox or a hyaena. A little, flippant, trickish, shallow fellow may be a fop or a pickpocket, with the soul of a ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 13 monkey ; while a big, burly, bold, white-headed man may be a great author or artist, or a warrior, with the soul of a lion. Instances of this kind may be cited by all of us, but for our purpose these will suffice. The satirist in such cases has simply to adhere to truthful personal delineation ; but satire is also produced by placing - the actors in ridiculous situations or engaged in incongruous actions. To illustrate my argument of truthful personal representation made satirical, I, at the risk of an accusation of egotism, take leave to introduce an engraving from one of my original pictures. The object I had in view was to show up the extremely foolish, the irreligious, the illegal, illogical, and wicked practice of duelling. This wretched remnant of barbarous and superstitious ages sup- poses that a bullet or a sword can decide the justice or the injustice, the truth or the falsehood, of any question between man and man. That superiority of bodily strength or skill in the use of a weapon may thus be ascertained, is probable ; but that a bullet or a sword has the power of discriminating between right and wrong, is an assumption as false as it is wicked. This genteel game of " homicide," however, our English law calls murder, and happily for society the practice is now abandoned in England. But as gentility and barefaced murder have so frequently been associated by noble lords, persons in the lower ranks of life have aped this privilege of the upper classes; consequently a linendraper, quarrelling on a racecourse with a blackleg, challenged the latter, and on fighting a duel, one was shot in the brain, the other fear- fully wounded. This scene I depicted soon after the murder and mutilation, and named the picture " Satisfaction ! " Group 2. Here, there is no personal exaggeration whatever ; the satire lies in the injuries both sustain ; while the real question of truth, of right or wrong, remains utterly unsettled, unless we consider both combatants as idiots properly punished. This I humbly submit is an example of true pictorial satire. Of this stupendous folly a remarkable instance has been afforded at this present time by a duel fought on Monday, July 7th, 1873, at Essanges, on the Luxembourg frontier, between the Bonapartist, M. Paul de Cassagnac, and M. Ranc, a noted Communist. Cassagnac received a wound from his adversary's sword which penetrated his arm as far up as the elbow. The seconds allowed the duel to proceed, when in the second encounter M. Ranc was severely »4 AN ESS AF ON wounded in the upper part of his arm. This entirely disabled M. Ranc. Ill blood had existed between the parties for seven or eight years, and nothing would appease the anger of those gentle- men but a senseless appeal to cold steel. The intended duel was trumpeted forth in the Paris press, and got up in the best theatrical style, this silly proceeding being dignified as a struggle between the Bonapartist and the Communist principles ! The grand battle came off in the presence of a very large crowd, and the police officers ! and with what result ? That each combatant was wounded, decided nothing, except that in skill with the murderous weapons they were on an equality. As for honour, for political honesty, for pure patriotism, for right or wrong, this duel leaves everything of this kind as before. Exaggerated personal peculiarities with a satirical intention, although indulged in by artists and sculptors of all ages, appears not to have been practised to any great extent or classified in England until the latter part of the eighteenth century, when the term "caricature" was applied to such pictorial and personal exaggeration. Like many other terms in art it has been derived from Italy, and imported into this country by our amateurs of art, but the earliest mention of the word occurs in Sir Thomas Brown's "Christian Morals," where he uses the word " caricatura repre- sentations." Indeed, the word itself did not appear in Italy until the latter half of the seventeenth century ; but that it was current soon after, in English educated society, is clear from the notice given by W. Hogarth and Henry Fielding, dated 4th September, 1 758. When a vessel or vehicle is overloaded or overcharged, the act of doing so is termed " caricare," an Italian verb to charge or load. Now a portrait in which a feature or the features are exaggerated, overdrawn, or overloaded, is said to be "carica- tured," or " overcharged." In this way, when diameter or the true likeness of any one is overdrawn, it becomes " caricature" Outre is also a synonymous term used by French artists. The popular explanation of this art "caricature" I consider due to Hogarth and Fielding, both of whom, by the dilettanti of that day, were accused of caricaturing society in their works. Since the publication of Hogarth's print of " The Bench," and Fielding's preface to his novel of " Joseph Andrews," the term has been understood and universally applied to any exaggerated pro- ductions of pen or pencil. From the fastidious Horace Walpole, down to the modern twaddle in art heard in any ordinary drawing-room, art is but superficially understood. As one example, the late Sir George ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. '5 Beaumont, an amateur of great pretension, and one highly- esteemed " in exceeding soft society" as a great authority in art, had in his collection a few pictures by " Artois," a mannerist of the French school. These Sir* George copied and bored over, till he believed that Artois' pictures were better than nature. Con- sequently, all landscape painters with whom he came in contact were in a manner over-persuaded to copy his valuable Artois pictures as a sure guide to nature. The writer was one of his victims on the altar of Artois. Fancy such a man as Turner or Constable being beset by such nonsense ! A brown tree with grey and a blue sky should always be present ! Rule first ! The true colour of landscape foliage was that of rich brown wood, highly polished. Rule second ! Because George Morland had a white horse in many of his pictures, therefore a white horse, or some similar amount of white, should be ever introduced. Sir George, in one of his artist-dictatorial fits, took Constable (nature's own child in landscape) to see the true colour of landscape foliage, namely, a brown Cremona fiddle lying on a fresh green grass plot ! Such dilettantism as this it was that chafed the great Hogarth and equally great Henry Fielding. Arraigned for truth to nature at the bar of these dilettanti, let us hear the two cele- brated culprits in defence of themselves. Of Hogarth's lighter productions the examples of heads on Group 3, " The Bench," are here introduced. While the question of "character" compared to "caricature" was being argued, Hogarth, in furtherance of his views, took up two of his etchings and had a strip of work in each plate burnished out, so as to admit of his illustration of caricature being etched upon the blank part. At the bottom of this Group 3 is an overcharged head, in fact a caricature by Leonardo da Vinci; with that is a silly looking head by Annibale Caracci, and a rudely drawn face produced by childish efforts in art. The larger head is by a contemporary Italian artist, Ghezzi, famous for caricatures. The illustrations on the right are from Raffaelle's cartoon "Paul preaching at Athens," the beggar being introduced from "the Beautiful Gate at the Temple." These are specimens of cha- racter, whilst the head of the beggar is caricatured on the left side of the print. In his engraving entitled "The Bench," pub- lished on the 4th of September, 1758, Hogarth endeavours to explain the different meaning of the words character, caricature, and outre in painting and drawing. " There are hardly any two things more essentially different than character and caricature ; nevertheless, they are usually confounded and mistaken for each 16 AN ESSAY ON other, on which account this explanation is attempted. It has ever been allowed that when a character is strongly marked in the living face, it may be considered as an index of the mind ; to express which, with any degree of justness in painting, required the utmost efforts of a great master." Such is Hogarth's definition of character. Outre signifies the exaggerated outlines of a figure, all, or in part, overcharged or caricatured. A giant or a dwarf may be called a common man outre. So any part, as a nose or a leg, made bigger or less than it ought to be, is that part outre. The other accused satirist, Henry Fielding, thus' defends his friend in his preface to the satiric novel, "Joseph Andrews." " He who should call the ingenious Hogarth a burlesque painter, would, in my opinion, do him very little honour; for sure it is much easier, much less the subject of admiration, to paint a man with a nose or any other feature of a preposterous size, or to expose him in some absurd or monstrous attitude, than to express the affections of men on canvas We shall find the true excellence of comic painting consists in the exactest copy of nature, whereas in caricature we allow all licence in distortions and exaggerations whatever." Henry Fielding must be admitted to be a great authority, not only as a novelist, but as a master of burlesque. In the print of "The Bench," Group 3, by Hogarth, we find a wonderfully characteristic portrait of a judge be-wigged and be-robed. His pomposity is alarming, and his profundity un- fathomable. His lordship on the right is either thinking very hard indeed, or else has a dozing fit upon him ; whilst his neigh- bour unmistakably gives up the cause, and resigns himself to sleep. The judge in the dark wig appears to be accompanying the chief baron in his portentous summing-up. As in the other case, Hogarth has had a part of the work burnished out, so as to allow him still further to illustrate his argument in respect to caricature. In the centre of the top is an exaggerated etching of the sleepy judge, wherein his naturally sharp features are rendered still sharper, while the likeness is preserved throughout the cari- cature. The three heads next are specimens of character from "The Last Supper," by Leonardo da Vinci; the head to the extreme right is another caricature of our sharp and sleepy judge. A caricature of one of Leonardo's heads also introduced in " The Last Supper," with one illustration of character from Raffaelle's "Sacrifice at Lystra," caricatured excellently well in the etching at the side, complete this plate, and Hogarth's illustration of the GROUP 3. (Page 16. HOGARTH. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. subject. Although Hogarth thoroughly understood and, as we see, clearly illustrated the principles of caricature, his engravings which come under this denomination are not so exaggerated in drawing as one might suppose they would be. The principles he laid down were carried out subsequently more completely by W. H. Bunbury Esq., a man of a good county family, and a really clever amateur, but it was under the pencil of James Gillray that they attained a complete and full development. The illustrations on Group 4 are given by way of 'showing the treatment of forms by the prince of caricaturists, James Gillray. On the upper part of the plate are three heads, drawn by myself. One is from the antique, representing the beau-ideal of manly beauty in the Apollo Belvidere ; the next represents the same style of features in a living individual, or in nature ; while the third has all the original points exaggerated. Thus they form a regular sequence, Art, Nature, and Caricature. Doubtless, the third head might be still more exaggerated, and thus assimilate more closely with Gillray' s practice. The central head on Group 4 is an example of character. It is a faithfully drawn and carefully etched head of the great William Pitt, by his admirer and own caricaturist James Sayer, of whose caricatures notices will appear in the course of this work. Pitt is here represented in his place in the House of Commons, replying to his great political opponents, Charles James Fox and Lord North. The object of introducing this drawing by Sayer is to exemplify as before "character" as contrasted with "carica- ture." On each side is an example of what became of the features of the "Heaven-born minister," when under the exaggerating influence of Gillray's satirical touch. Adhering closely to his wig and bag, Pitt's nose has been seized by Gillray and pulled out to a ridiculous extent in both instances. Here we have the true exemplification of caricature. The head to the left is from Gillray's print, "Pitt uncorking old Sherry," alluding to an expose of Sheridan's political conduct. The slender figure of Pitt and his thin neck are also under caricature influence. The illustration on the right is from " The Garden of Eden," where the slender figure of the great minister and his prominent nose are comically rendered by Gillray. Beneath the head of Pitt is an exaggerated likeness of his great political opponent, Charles James Fox. The likeness is well preserved, but by a few skilful touches the massive, swarthy, hirsute head of Fox becomes perfectly demoniacal. He wears the detested " cap of liberty," D 18 AN ESSAY ON ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. with the tricoloured cockade of the Paris revolutionists. Fox's projecting eyebrows and two locks of hair are ingeniously made to represent horns. This is from a caricature in which Fox is said to reveal his true character as a diabolical traitor to his king and country. The group of legs on the right is an example of Gillray's richest style of caricature. The corpulence of the Marquis of Salisbury, Lord Chamberlain to King George III., is here ridiculed in the balustrade - shaped legs, and general contour of the noble lord's understanding. On the right is a caricature of Pitt's naturally slender limbs, here represented spider-like in shape. These are the legs belonging to the head of Pitt, when " Un- corking old Sherry," copied from the popular caricature by J. Gillray. These illustrations of " nature, or character," and of the application to them of the principles of caricature, it is considered will be amply sufficient to guide the reader to a correct judgment of the efforts of caricaturists, especially if he should confine his investigation of this subject to its development in " Free England." DRAWN AND ETCHED BY R. W. BUSS. PRINCIPLES OF CARICATURE. CARICATURE DIVIDED INTO INVOLUNTARY OR UNINTENTIONAL, AND VOLUNTARY OR INTENTIONAL. FOLIO III. Involuntary Caricature — Illustrations. — Savage and Fashionable Monstrosities — Classical Monsters. ' Christian Monsters. — Bayeux Tapestry. — False Art of Watteau, Boucher, Thornhill, &c. — Stage Dandyism : Mrs. Siddons, J. Wallack, Charles Kean, H. Fuseli, R.A. ,HE principles of caricature thus laid down apply to all the comic or satiric productions from the earliest period to the present hour. But a satiric intention is not always present in these instances, whether ancient or modern. Comicality may and does exist in early efforts in art ; but on examination this ludicrous appearance will be found not due to a desire to ridicule or to satirise any individual, but simply to a feeble power of drawing. Ex- aggeration or over-charged drawing does not necessarily involve a satiric intention, although one quality of caricature may be present. Thus ludicrous efforts of art, devoid of satiric intent, form one large class of examples, and may be described as, "Involuntary or Unintentional Caricature" whilst such efforts as, combined with exaggerated forms, have a satiric intention, fall under the head of " Voluntary or Intentional Caricature.' 1 '' These two broad divisions of ludicrous efforts in art, or of comic appearances, such as those effected by the adoption of absurd yet fashionable eccentricities, as wry necks, wasp-like waists, the Grecian bend, affected lameness, pigtails, monstrous loads of false hair, and other absurdities, will embrace a large number of instances of unsuspected caricature ; while the student can readily place all intention to ridicule, or satirise, in the other broad division of avowed caricature. Involuntary or Unintentional Caricature. Involuntary or unintentional caricature results whenever an untrained hand essays in any manner to imitate human or brute 2 0 AN FSSAF ON forms. To obtain a specimen of this class of art it is only necessary to place a black-lead pencil, a piece of chalk, or a slate pencil in the hand of a child, and ask for a delineation of a man, a horse, or a ship ; if the child have the slightest idea of drawing, there will be produced something in the way of art quite monstrous and ludicrous. Exaggeration, and consequent caricature, will be inevitable, and this exaggeration will be greater or less according to the practice of hand and the power of observation. The uncivilised man, or savage, or barbarian, or heathen (according to our civilised ideas), will in regard to art be on a par with a child. Of this involuntary caricature, thousands of specimens are being daily produced by children of all nations, wherever any material for delineation exist. Uncivilised nations, however, appear to be more used to model forms in clay or carve them in wood, than to delineate them ; hence we see these attempts to imitate the human form assume extraordinary aspects. This unexpected and ludicrous amount of exaggeration arises not merely from art-ignorance, but from a natural and laudable desire to present even in a rude way the figure of a god, and this with a truly serious intention, not in the most remote degree satirical. To illustrate this point of unintentional caricature, on Group 5 are several examples selected almost at random from the practices of savage nations, as well as from those wherein a high degree of civilisation has been attained. The most prominent subject on this group is an idol from the South Seas. In this example we have a very rude imitation of the human figure, hardly superior to that of a child's first scrawling in regard to truth of resemblance ; but by way of compensation the invention of the sculptor has given a large head to the figure ; and, as vigilance to watch an enemy, or to catch prey, is a great desideratum in savage life, these qualities are supposed to be represented by a pair of wonderfully exaggerated eyes, reaching backwards, and descending to the heels of the figure ; an enormous mouth fitted with rows of savage-looking teeth indicate a masticating power essential to tough anthropophagy. As the poor uneducated heathen has fashioned this log of wood to be an object of worship, he has naturally bestowed upon his god those qualities which in his ideas are most useful and desirable, and we may suppose according to some obscure idea of beauty he may possess. A similarly disordered sense of beauty is exemplified in the head of an idol brought from the Pacific Islands. It is an imitation of what is a godlike form according to the creed of a savage ; as in the previous example, the eyes and the mouth are hideously exaggerated for doubtless the same reasons. GROUP 5. (Page £1; ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. This model is made of framework covered with small red feathers closely and ingeniously laid, the eyes are formed of two black balls fastened on oval plates of mother-of-pearl, and the teeth are of white wood. This is also an example of unin- tentional caricature. The other strange-looking head is from a portrait of a savage chief, drawn for and engraved in an edition of Captain Cook's Voyages. It is the head of an "exquisite" of Prince William's Sound, and is an example of serious exaggeration under a mistaken idea of the beautiful. The physiognomy of this savage chieftain is not naturally handsome according to European ideas of beauty, yet this repulsive aspect is ren- dered still more so by the tattooing process, and the paint in which he has indulged. But the most extraordinary caricature proceeding is his desire to have two mouths instead of one. In civilised society one mouth is considered as ample provision of this kind for beauty, for sustenance, and for the pecuniary means of individuals ; but these savage nations of the Pacific insanely insist upon having two mouths. For this desirable end, an incision is made in the chin, just below the lower lip, and for a time kept open by plugs ; when the part has healed, this additional mouth is still farther improved by having one or more iron nails inserted by way of ornament on " court days " and "presentations" to their savage majesties. This is an instance of unintentional personal caricature by exaggeration of what is considered as beautiful. Since Captain Cook's time, however, civilisation has done its work in the South Seas, so that in regard to this illustration it is a thing of the past. Another example of personal caricature is given in this drawing of a Chinese lady's foot. In the insane wish to produce a style of beauty, the natural and exquisite organ of locomotion is, according to Chinese custom, cramped by bandages and other means in such a way as to prevent free movement, and that beautiful action of the toes upon the foot, which free and unrestrained nature would permit. To venture upon venerable jokes, it would seem that Chinese gentlemen were determined "to limit the understanding of their ladies," and to insist that they do " stand upon trifles." Distortion produced by false notions of beauty are common enough amongst uncivilised nations, and of these modern travellers give us numerous instances. The "Botucados" of South America insert large plugs of wood into the lower lip, producing a most frightful aspect ; others enlarge the lobe of the ear by inserting shells. But while we ridicule these barbarous practices, we must 22 AN ESSAY ON not forget that civilised nations are open to adverse criticism on this point. What excuse can be offered for the insane practice of compressing- the delicate organs of respiration by tight lacing, a constriction of the waist which absolutely produces deformity, reduces the waist to half its natural and proper size, and some- times reverses the action of the heart, lungs, liver, and stomach. Health is destroyed, the circulation of the blood impeded — hence cold feet, and the ladies' horror, red noses. The example of tight lacing here given bears a close analogy to the form of the savage god above, and contrasts with the natural form of the female trunk. The waist is by nature placed a little below the ribs ; but fashion, idolatry, and dressmakers have persisted in caricatur- ing the female form, by placing this part in the most absurd manner, ranging from the arm-pits down low upon the hips ! Nor need we ridicule the Chinese lady's foot very much, while our "dear girls" destroy the beautiful action and form of their feet by wearing stupid bits of wood called heels, which forces the weight of the body down in front, crushes the toes into a bunch, pro- duces corns and bunions, and makes the votaries of fashion walk on the points of their toes. Nor is the skull distortion of savages confined to them, for as regards external appearance, the modern lady's skull is ap- parently as violently distorted as any of the heads of savages exhibited in the Museum of the College of Surgeons. Lumps of wool, horse hair, and hair cut from the heads of hospital patients or from paupers, are made up into chignons, and, stuck on our "dear creatures'" heads, produce an external shape of skull sufficient to drive a phrenologist stark mad. Fashion has in all ages been the great agent in producing personal caricature, from the ridiculous waggle, called the "Grecian bend," to holding of the head awry, and other such absurdities. Nature, when developed by air and exercise, always shows more real beauty than conceited man will readily permit. He docks his horses, deprives them of their beautiful flowing manes and tails, nicks their tails, and reverses their right position ; he docks his poodle-dogs to imitate in ridiculous fashion the tufts and manes of lions ; and, not content with that, he in himself imitates the dog's tail, tuft and all, but he hangs the tail on to his head, instead of its right place, according to the Darwinian theory and the brute anatomy. Numerous other fashionable monstrosities, equally absurd, and many other modes of caricature, might be ad- duced, but for the present purpose the examples given on Group 5 are sufficient as specimens of unintentional personal caricature. GROUP 6. (Page 2,3. Jlnubis. Centaur. Janus. R W BUSS DEL. ■ C LASSICAL MONSTERS. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. *3 Classical Monsters. The subjects on Group 6 lead us on delicate ground, as it is that of classical lore ; nevertheless, if exaggerated forms and extraordinary combinations constitute caricature, degenerating into the Grotesque, here we have ample illustration of involuntary or unintentional caricature. True it is, the forms are in better drawing, better chosen, and better combined than those of the preceding examples ; yet these classical monsters, or minor gods of the ancients, are as much caricatures as the hideous wooden deities of the savages. What can we say of a god with two faces and one brain, or two halves of that cerebral organ joined together back to back ? Yet this is the god Janus, to whose honour a temple was reared, and who figured to great advantage in peace and war ! True, this combination expressed a poetical and classical belief or tradition ; yet the symbol is nothing more in art than a monstrosity. In the centre of Group 6 is a chubby boy blindfolded, with wings to fly, but without the proper and necessary muscles to move them ; this pretty little monster is no other than Cupid, so dear to love-sick mortals ! Flying in Paphian bowers, gathering sweets from flowers, and aiming darts at mortals' hearts, may be all very pretty and very sentimental, but cannot remove the dear little juvenile out of the category of caricature. The bull - headed man, the Minotaur, is another monstrosity, as is also the one of a bull's body with a man's head, symbolizing a cannibal taste on the part of* the Minotaur, yet it is a caricature so violent as to verge upon the Grotesque. Then again we have the Satyr, a hook-nosed, bearded, and horned man, joined at the waist to the half of a goat, to which animal the head on Group 6 bears a great resemblance. The mermaid again is another absurdity, a beautiful woman to the waist, but below, instead of legs, joined to the tail and fins of a fish. The Centaur, half a man and half a horse. The Triton also, a human head and trunk joined to a horse's legs, fitted with large flaps for water-progression. The dog-headed god of Anubis is another monster. Now let us remark a little upon these " monsters made easy " by classical authors, and accepted by the civilised world. Here are combinations far more impossible and absurd than those in the wildest " freak of nature." Bodies joined to bodies with different and double vital systems and digestive organs, human to brute forms, with double or single brains assigned to one head, and so on. These symbols of classical beliefs, AN ESSAY ON absurd as they are, have nevertheless descended, ad infinitum, to us from antiquity, and formed the principal stock of ideas for caricaturists, even to the present hour, as will be manifest on an examination of their works. The Satyr of antiquity has been adopted by Italian and German artists to represent the Satan of Christian belief. The examples here given are but a few amongst an immense number of classical monsters belonging to the coins and sculptured gems of antiquity. Christian Monsters. On Group 7, the principal illustration is our old friend the classical Satyr with a new face. The early illustrators of Christian subjects drew upon the remains of classical art for many of their impersonations, and at once pressed into their service the Satyr of antiquity, and christened him Satan. The figure of Satan was modified in the wildest way by German artists, who added to the classical Satyr, grim faces on the arms, breast, and shoulders of his figure, and expanded the hand into a tiger's paw embellished with long claws. Large bat-like wings, a long serpent-like tail, with a savage sting in the end of it, completed the toilette of the Author of Evil. They had not the advantage of modern discoveries by which the gorilla might have fairly been taken as the representative of the Enemy of Man. This serious exaggera- tion on Group 7 is taken from an old German block engraved in the early days of engraving and printing. Numerous different examples of Satan are dispersed over the works of the early Italian and German artists, in which curious fanciful forms appear. The abode of the wicked is by them depicted as an immense dragon's mouth vomiting flames, into which Satan and his fiends are driving sinners. Death, another Christian impersonation, is derived from the invention of early artists. This idea has been represented in various ways, all of them being skeletons of the human form, or the bony structure partly covered with muscles. Such.are the " Danse Macabre" of early monkish times, and the more modern treatment of the subject by Hans Holbein in his celebrated "Dance of Death." These representations of Satan became modified by the pecu- liarities of Fauns of antiquity, blended with a sensual expression, derived from living examples of licentiousness. Such are the fiends introduced by early artists, adopted by Luca Signorelli, and by Michael Angelo in his gigantic picture of "The Last Judgment," OR AW N AND ENGRAVED BY R. W. BUSS. CHRISTIAN MONSTERS. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 25 painted on the wall of the Sistine Chapel, in Rome. In the forms of these fiends we find elongated ears, horns, and a hideous gorilla-like expression in the face ; a sort of rudimental tail to the body, while the nails of the hands and feet are improved into formidable claws, to assist their canine fangs in flesh-tearing. Examples of this exaggeration are given in Group 7, from Luca Signorelli, Michael Angelo, and Rubens. In all three they are engaged in the interesting occupation of feasting on the flabby flesh of voluptuous sinners. I believe the only idea really originating in Christian art or legend is that of a cherub, and an outrageous little monster it is, in spite of our art-education teaching us to admire such a violent exaggeration. Here is a baby's head, with a pair of duck's wings, flying about — a brain, with no body, no spine, no arms, no legs ; nor has the cherub any respiratory or digestive organs. The monstrous combinations of human and brute forms are incongruous enough, but in the cherub we reach the highest or the lowest point. of absurdity. No symbol has been more freely used than this caricature, even by our greatest artists ; yet, not- withstanding, fond mammas gaze delighted on this absurdity. When applied to portraits of their departed babes the monstrosity is unquestionable. In the class of involuntary or unintentional caricature may be included all the feeble efforts in art found in illuminated MSS., in early sculpture, and in coins. The illustrations of this class of art are taken from that important and very venerable piece of needlework, known and valued so highly as the Bayeux tapestry. This work is not tapestry at all, but simply a large sampler worked in different coloured worsteds, on canvas ; but by no less a personage than Queen Matilda, the wife of William the Conqueror. While his Dukeship came over to England and settled our business in "our tight little island!" Mrs. Duke William amused herself by stitching this historical caricature. It is twenty inches wide, two hundred and fourteen feet long, and was intended as decora- tive drapery for a church, frequented by Queen Matilda. It is, as it deserves to be, most carefully preserved in the museum of the grand old Norman city of Bayeux. Outlined upon canvas by some monk of very humble art-power, her own being still less, she no doubt made the originally bad drawing much worse ; the result is the largest, the most valuable, the most historical, the most national, and the most funny caricature in the whole world ! E 26 AN ESSAY ON King Edward the Confessor is represented herewith his fingers near his nose, executing that optical feat known vulgarly as " taking a sight," a proof, by-the-bye, of the antiquity of this popular and facetious amusement of boys in general. Duke William, in mail, with the nasal defence on his iron skull-cap, is haranguing his Norman robbers ; but it must be confessed, under his lady wife's needle, he seems to possess neither sense nor spirit. While smiling at Queen Matilda's involuntary carica- ture, however, it must not be forgotten that it preserves to us a mass of information on historical, political, and military affairs of the Norman period, unattainable from any other source. So highly prized is it, and has been for many years, that Napoleon I., when contemplating, in 1803, the invasion and conquest of England, had it brought to Paris from Bayeux, and exhibited with great state, for the purpose of stimulating the French to the expedition against "perfidious Albion." The illustrations given are sufficient to enable the student to classify under the head of involuntary or unintentional caricature, nearly the entire mass of early drawings contained in the old illuminated MSS. and feeble art of early date. Before taking leave of this division of the subject, it may be well to refer to instances of personal involuntary caricature, and applications of exaggerated form to many works which would bring these beautiful efforts of art under the class of involuntary cari- cature. Greek sculptors, for example, sought by combining all the fine points of the male or female figure, to embody in the "Apollo," the "Venus," the "Hercules," and other antique statues, an ideal beauty of form surpassing that possessed by any individual. " A faultless monster which the world ne'er saw ! " is the description given by a poetical critic on antique beauty. Here is an undoubted case of exaggeration, the leading quality of caricature ; yet, as it may be deemed heretical to classify under that head the beautiful statues of antiquity, we must withhold such an apparently condemnatory verdict. If exaggeration or overcharging produces caricature, the antique overcharges or elevates nature ; while what we commonly understand by cari- cature debases nature. Be it so, for the comfort of classical enthusiasts ! If we recognise the principle that exaggeration of forms or of incidents constitutes caricature, then we have an immense mass of involuntary caricature in directions where it would be little sus- ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 2 7 pected. What else than caricatures are the shepherds and shep- herdesses of Watteau and Boucher, whether in the flesh or merely on canvas? Courtiers of both sexes, patched and powdered, attired in satins, leading a fictitious pastoral life, tending sheep with well- washed and scented fleeces, gilt horns, and hoofs ! and pretending to be country lads and lasses ! What can be more absurd than opera-house shepherds decked out in gay ribbons and velvet, silk stockings, and shiny shoes ! rings on their fingers and diamond buckles on their shoes ! All this is false, for real shepherds wear smock frocks, corduroys, and hobnailed boots ; eat hunks of fat bacon on bread, and drink small beer ; while instead of playing on their pipes, they smoke them ! Again, the gods and goddesses of Verrio, of Thornhill, and other ceiling painters, tricked out in velvets, satins, and shot silks, like ordinary mortals, and playing on big and little fiddles, flutes, and trumpets ! All this is absurd. It is in fact nothing more nor less than involuntary caricature ! What else can be said of the excruciating beauty of the musical pictorial embellishments, and of the exaggerated charms of the ladies who figure in the magazines of fashion published for dressmakers ? A pompous style and attitude assumed by an ugly little man or woman, becomes a caricature. A soldier fleeing from battle — a fat, unwieldy man or woman dancing and aping the elastic step of youth : all such are instances of caricature, although un- intentional. Of a similar nature are all delineations or paintings in which great displays of learning are used to accomplish ridiculously easy results. Horace Twiss declared that Mrs. Siddons stabbed the loaf when she cut bread and butter ! and in deep tragic tones said, " Give me the bowl," when she wished for some salad ! " Taking a sledge-hammer to kill a fly," "Much ado about nothing," are quotations illustrative of the intrinsic qualities of many works of art, and of our daily experiences. Henry Fuseli, R.A., one of the most learned members of the Royal Academy of London, was sometimes engaged to illustrate domestic subjects, for which his anatomical and peculiar study totally unfitted him. Respectable country gentlemen under his pencil appeared like maniacs ; little boys and girls like angels or fiends in his pictures from Milton or Dante. Of a similar kind was the absurdity committed by James Wallack, a leading actor, who dressed a farmer, in one of Jerrold's pieces dramatized from Sir David Wilkie's admirable and natural picture of "The Rent Day." This sturdy clodhopper, a simple 28 AN ESSAY ON ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. farmer, Wallack dressed in a beautifully made coat, waistcoat, and breeches, silk stockings, and black patent leather shiny boots ! brilliant rings on his fingers, and a black wig in full curl. So with our actresses, no matter what may be the proper costume, all must be sacrificed to the prevailing fashion, so that they may prove attractive on the stage. Such ideas, whether in painting, acting, or in writing, are senseless exaggerations, altogether out of place, and are neither more nor less than caricature. Carica- ture effects, before the reform in costume on the stage had been accomplished, were abundant. How ridiculous must Macbeth have appeared, attired in a red coat trimmed with gold lace, powdered wig, with a long tail tied round with ribbon, a long sword, military boots, and spurs ! Again, Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, whose costume belongs to an early period of Danish history, was played in a Court suit of black velvet, bag-wig — well powdered — ruffles, lace cravat, buckles, and dress sword ! Then think of the absurd trick of kicking down a chair to express astonishment when the ghost of the murdered king appears to Hamlet in the closet scene. Othello, the Moor of Venice, costumed like a modern flunkey, with his face blacked and his hair powdered ! These and many other instances might be adduced to show how fruitful a source of caricature were barn- representations, as well as those of our national theatres, even when the great works of our dramatists were presented, and sup- ported by our greatest actors. To John Kemble, Charles Kemble, and the antiquary, J. R. Planche, the reform in stage costume and its accessories is due. The late Charles Kean, during his management of the Princess's Theatre, placed many plays on his stage with so much antiquarian accuracy that each scene was a study for historical painters. In this he was assisted by the eminent antiquary the late Henry Shaw, F.S.A., &c. FOLIO IV. VOLUNTARY OR INTENTIONAL CARICATURE. Voluntary or Intentional Caricature from the Earliest Period to the Invention of Printing. — Satire, an Aid to Reforms in Political or Social Matters. — Means of Drawing and Modelling in a Rude State of Society. — Colour. — Egjptain Painting. — True Fresco compared to Tempera. — Pictures on Papyri. — Etruscan Vases. — Examples of Caricature. — Original of Punch. — Dark Ages. — Christian Art. — Carvings in Wood and Stone. — Manuscripts. — Tapestry. [E have seen that feeble drawing, or delineation, in- WJWiM ev ^ ta ^y sm k s into caricature, whether intended so s f <§^f j§£ or not. Examples of various kinds have been adduced ; ^||^§| DU t in all these cases it must be borne in mind that fthe exaggeration arises simply from defective art- education, is one of the earliest stages of delineation, and one in which for a time all early efforts may be considered equal in talent. But after several efforts, the individual who has a power of observing forms has his eye and hand trained : therefore, the results are better. Ridicule, that quality so common to mankind, now, in many instances, comes into play ; hence arises a satirical vein so essential to real or voluntary caricature. The habit of observation, grafted on to improved practice in drawing, perceives at once a mouth very capacious or of extremely limited extent ; a long or a short nose, or a snub ; eyes large or small, dark or light ; vision straight or oblique ; hair long and lank, or short and curly. Peculiarities such as these become, in the satirist's hands, exaggerated wholly or partly; thus arises the class of voluntary or intentional caricature, what- ever may be the degree of power indicated by the delineation. This vein of satire, although employed to ridicule the personal appearance of an individual, may be associated with a higher aim, that of ridiculing or satirising his actions. Then comes the caricaturing of his figure and general demeanour. A still higher AN ESSAY ON aim is that of satirising political delinquents, and lashing- the vices or ridiculing the follies of the individual, or of a class of which he is the type. This is the quality which originates social or political caricatures, and may itself be pungent and well directed, even when expressed by feeble delineation ; when, however, to a close, observant power, a keen sense of ridicule, a just insight into the moving springs of action in individuals or in classes, is added rapid and correct delineation of the figure, caricature then becomes an art at once difficult in invention and execution. Under the head of "voluntary caricature" a wide range presents itself, as it embraces the art of caricature and the various modes of executing works of this kind, from the creation of man to the invention of printing. What instruments would, in a rude state of man, be available for delineating form ? Chalks of various colours, burnt wood or charcoal, earths dissolved in water, the juices of plants, would supply means to the juvenile painter. Clay, in a plastic state, would afford the incipient sculptor means of practice in his art. In this way, both unintentional and intentional caricatures must have been executed. A more advanced degree of observation would suggest the covering of surfaces, with colour between the outlines. The colour, however, might easily be rubbed off: this would suggest some mode of binding it to the surfaces on which it might be applied, and thus render pigments adhesive and durable. This step in art, so far as linear drawing and colouring are concerned, is one of easy accomplishment, and common to nearly every nation, civilised or savage. Modelling would also run parallel to drawing and painting ; for soft clay, or earth, and the finger are means ever present. The earliest known specimens of drawing date before the heroic ages. At an early date brushes had been invented, and colours ground to a fine powder, so as to mix freely with water. Egyptian painting shows that the colours employed were simple earths, which in the course of time have remained unchanged. These colours, or earths, were white, black, yellow, red, blue, and green, either used in their natural hues, or blended together as might be required. Wood, canvas, or a wall, was the material upon which large pictures were executed ; for smaller efforts, the leaves of the papyrus were employed, whence comes our word " paper." The outline sketched in charcoal was then re-drawn in red colour, and when the design was completed, the spaces between covered with the required colours. These colours, ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. if mixed with animal gelatine, would adhere to the surfaces on which they were applied. A binding material is also found in the juices contained in the shoots of certain plants, gums and other exudations from trees furnish such a means, also the albuminous part of birds' eggs, and isinglass. These various means are all included in the general term "distemper" similar to scene- painting, or by the Italian term "tempera." In one or other of these methods, the Egyptian paintings were executed, which exist to the present hour. But a freshly plastered surface, such as a wall or other superficies, would contain lime in its caustic state. Now, if on a surface so prepared colours be laid, the lime absorbing the colours would, combining with the oxygen of the air, produce a thin skin, or coating of carbonate of lime ; that is, simply marble, which would fix the colours without employing gums or gelatine. This process is real "fresco," or "fresh" painting, and is so named by Italian artists. If the wall becomes dry before the work is finished, the pellicle of carbonate of lime is formed ; then, any colour applied not being absorbed, will rub off, unless fixed by one or other of the binding materials mentioned above. Now upon this showing, the praise of Egyptian fresco pictures rests upon very questionable grounds, unless the entire subject was such as could be readily executed on the fresh, active plaster, and completed in the course of four or five hours. In the majority of cases, Egyptian pictures would be simple tempera or distemper, seldom fresco. Such, then, were the materials employed by artists upon caricatures, unintentional or intentional. Specimens of both kinds are preserved in various European museums, especially in the British Museum, and are copied in various books of travel. Of these, in many instances, the satirical animus is evident. We find in Assyrian bassi-relievi and sculptured or incised pictures evident intention to exaggerate or underrate with a satirical aim. The warriors are all of preposterous size, quite out of proportion to their enemies in this respect, so that the gigantic captain is carica- tured, or, what is more likely, his enemies are ridiculed, by being represented as mere pigmies. Their prisoners are also made diminutive for the same reason. The muscular development of Assyrian figures is of a remark- ably extravagant character. Gigantic winged bulls of exag- gerated form, or lions with human heads, guarded the entrances to Assyrian palaces or temples. An eagle-headed human being is frequently introduced, probably emblematical of the Sun. This 3 1 AN ESSAY ON caricature art of Assyria dates several hundred years before the Christian era, and appears to have symbolised strength and swiftness. Mr. Thomas Wright, in his " History of Caricature," quotes, from Sir Gardner Wilkinson's " Manners and Customs of the Ancient Egyptians," passages which show them to have had a strong sense of humour. On one of the great monuments at Thebes, a wine party is painted, in which both sexes are repre- sented. Some of the ladies have partaken so freely of the juice of the grape as to require support ; in modern times, they would have been fined five shillings " by the worthy magistrate," had they ventured into London streets. This fact is remarkable as being the earliest pictorial satire on a fearful vice, whose victims have been lashed by Hogarth, by E. V. Rippingille, and our veteran teetotaller, George Cruikshank. The celebrated Etruscan vases have been discovered in abundance in Sicily, Southern Italy, and ancient Etruria. They are formed of dried or baked clay, and are elaborately painted. They are almost invariably found in tombs, but do not appear to have contained the ashes of the dead. In beauty of form and propriety of decoration, they are models to potters. The paintings on them were produced about from 200 to 500 years before the Christian era. The immense number of vases, the variety of their size, form, and decoration, has employed the antiquary fully to classify them. Our purpose is not to do this, but to assign the two given specimens to the so-called severe style, though comic in intention. The red colour is the natural one of the clay ; the outlines are drawn with a brush and black pigment. Behind the figures, the background is a solid black, and the whole is covered with a fine varnish. Comic scenes are more frequently introduced in the designs of a later date, than in those of the earlier period. Our designs in Group 8, being intended merely to show the caricature draw- ing, have not the black background, which has therefore been purposely omitted. Many of the designs on the vases are very beautiful, lively in composition, free in action, and the draperies arranged with great taste. The faces of the figures are mostly of beautiful form, and in fine proportion. Our great sculptor Flaxman studied closely the designs on Etruscan vases, and in a similar style designed his Homeric subjects, as well as his illustrations to Dante's " Inferno," all so celebrated for their high qualities in art. These celebrated vases exhibit design and painting to great advantage ; indeed, the art in many ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 33 instances is of the most elevated style of design and execution. They vary greatly in merit, and also in the mode of applying the colours, but the majority of them have the designs traced in black vitreous pigment upon the yellowish red body of the vase. The figures thus outlined are then thrown up from the body of the vase by the solid black background ; this black is also a vitreous pigment which, by being baked, becomes indelible, and fused into the body of the vessel itself. The art of Etruria affords examples of decidedly intentional caricature, two examples of which are given in Group 8. One is an exaggeration worthy of James Gillray, of modern times, and is full of fun and caricature drawing. A poor stupid creature is here represented utterly and absolutely unfit to be a warrior, corpulency and weak limbs unite to deprive him of the liberty and power of free action so essential to a soldier, in addition to which he wears a crushing helmet, a tremendous crest, shield, and spear. At whom this caricature is levelled does not appear, but it is an unquestionable satire upon that large class of empty boasters so numerous in this world, whether in ancient or modern times. The other example is that of a dwarf, himself a caricature of humanity. It possesses all the unamiable appear- ance of these ill-favoured and ill-natured specimens of stunted manhood. It may be merely a portrait of some pet-dwarf, or it may, by a few ridiculous touches, be intended as a satire on the fashion of keeping dwarfs for amusement, much as monkeys or pet-dogs are kept in modern times. Classical times were famous for the keeping and petting of dwarfs by wealthy and eminent personages. The Emperor Theodosius kept a " homun- culus," who was so diminutive that he resembled a partridge and could sing a tune ! Alypius of Alexandria was said to be only one foot five and a half inches high ; though little in stature he was great in mind, for he was an excellent logician and a great philosopher ! This practice of keeping dwarfs, beginning in classical days, has but recently been discontinued in European courts. The large figure is a caricature, engraved in the Etruscan antiquities, published in the great French Encyclo- paedia. It represents a philosopher thinking his hardest ; the artist has happily hit off the mock gravity and affectation of deep and penetrating thought. Such a mountain of pretended intellect could only produce a " ridiculus mus." The lower illustration is from a bronze figure of an ass, clothed in the Roman toga, and is an unquestionable caricature of a Roman consul, or other public man. It was discovered by the F 5 4 AX ESSAF ON Count de Caylus, and is interesting as an example of fun and satire in art existing in classical times. The centre illustration in Group 8 is peculiarly an object of interest, as it is supposed to be the original of our " guide, philosopher, and friend" Punch! The large nose and comical expression in this bronze figure certainly suggest to us the highly popular tyrant of domestic life, and model wife-beater. This head, drawn from the bronze figure, was first published by Ficorini, and would appear to settle the contested question as to the origin of Punch. This figure is a caricature of a Roman actor called Marcus. There is also an antique gem, having engraved upon it a head with the exaggerated features, now so well known as those of Mr. Punch. The comic personages of the Italian stage ex- travaganzas are considered to be derived from caricatures of Roman actors. Pulcinello, the Neapolitan Punch, is attributed to the invention of Silvio Fiorelli, an actor, about the beginning of the seventeenth century. Dr. Johnson, however, gives it as his opinion that Punch is an exaggeration of the character in the old moralities, called "Vice," itself a satire on the doings of mankind, and also preserving to us the puppet or "motion," recently revived in England as the "Marionettes." The remaining example is a drawing from an ancient figure of Sar- dinian origin. It is evidently of early date, is strangely exag- gerated in drawing, and decidedly comic in effect ; but it still admits of a doubt whether this results from feebleness in the artist, or an intention to satirise an ancient general or other officer. These are but a few examples of ancient caricature, sufficient for our purpose, which is to hang on a thread, as it were, instances of "voluntary or intentional caricature" before the so-called "dark ages." When the dense cloud which for centuries hung over art gradually passed away, it disclosed a new style of art in its various branches, founded upon the ruins of that of classical ages, but still bearing a distinctive character from that which preceded it. Christianity had now become the acknowledged belief of those who held power. Cathedrals, churches, baptisteries, abbeys, monasteries, and other religious edifices, now appeared, instead of pagan temples, dedicated to a host of immoral and fabulous gods and goddesses. In many instances, heathen temples were appropriated by the Christians, and refitted for the ceremonials of the new faith. In the decorations and architectural details of the cathedrals, wonderful constructive power was shown by the architects, and a prodigality of invention and design by the Etruscan. Etrusaan. Ifoman. DRAWN AND ETCHED BY R. W. BUSS. ANCIENT CARICATURES. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 35 ornamentists. It is in this department of art that satire abounds. Hardly a gargoyle or boss exists that has not some satirical allusion. The misereres, the stalls, and other ornamental portions are highly satirical. Nor is this result to be wondered at, when we know that sculptors, carvers, and common workmen were entrusted to compose figures or groups, and to execute them in stone or wood. Themselves uneducated, except in the art-routine of manipulation, they thus slily revenged themselves on the well- fed jolly priests, who domineered over them in true lordly style, and rebuked the men for their slightest transgressions against the ordinances of the Romish Church. Henry III., in England, a timid and pious ruler, founded many cathedrals, and enriched them with ornamental sculpture and painting. This king imported a number of foreign artisans, and to them the details of the ornamentation of the cathedrals were entrusted. A "saint manufactory" was set up on a large scale, and legends carved or depicted, with but a minimum of taste or talent. As might be expected, the figures were rude, clumsy, and ungraceful, having ill-proportioned bodies to which strangely distorted limbs were joined ; the expres- sion on the faces was comic, if not satirical. It is certain that the art of painting, on a scale larger than that of illuminated manuscripts, was introduced in England under Henry III., and practised by foreign artists. Almost inces- sant wars, famines, and pestilences, drove artists and other studious men to seek the quiet of the cloister, so that painting, after a time, there found refuge from the violence of Northern hordes. Mosaics and some MSS. show that the arts were not extinct. The vellum books of monkish scribes being embellished with designs of various kinds, showing different degrees of talent, some ridiculously feeble in execution at first, through numerous stages, to elaborate and beautifully painted miniature pictures. The art of painting, applied to walls and canvas, or wood, was now adopted by religionists as pictorial expositions of the articles of the Christian faith. The acts of the Saviour, his apostles, and of the early fathers, were the chief subjects executed. For MSS. the vellum was carefully prepared from calfskins, then roughened by pumice-powder, and thus it became a ready surface to receive the outline and finish of colour. A black liquid or pigment was used for the outline, and, when required, colours ground very fine, and well washed, to free them from impurities, were diluted with animal or vegetable 36 AN ESSAV ON gluten, and water. In numerous manuscripts wonderfully elaborated ornament was introduced, exquisitely drawn and coloured, the gorgeous effect of colour heightened by gold in low relief. The embossed forms were modelled in solid white paint, and, when hardened by drying, were gilt, and bright- ened to a brilliant metallic lustre by the process of burnishing. The text, written with quill or reed pins, was in red, black, or other colour, according to the ink employed. Such were the means of art for some ages, and during the early times of Christianity. When so much depended on the single unassisted hand of the artist, cleric, or layman, it was inevitable that works of art, good or bad, must have been scarce, and valuable, more or less, according to circumstances. Caricature, therefore, with or without satirical intention, must have been confined within very narrow limits during these early times, and the satirist's vocation but imperfectly understood. Still the percep- tion of the ridiculous and the love of satire, so fully developed in man, were, as we see, freely exercised, though fated to circulate amongst but few admirers. Every national museum, every col- legiate library in all European capitals and other parts of the world, possesses many, or a few, of these beautifully illumin- ated manuscripts. These remnants of early ages are considered of inestimable value, and are most carefully preserved and jealously guarded. Painting in churches was freely applied to the walls, vaulted ceilings, mouldings, and round the massive columns. Of these pictures, many specimens exist, where the eternal whitewash pail of " Church wardenism " has been superseded by pure water. As works of art, they are in themselves contemp- tible, and on a level with the MSS. of the time, but doubtless, when viewed in connection with the architecture and coloured mouldings, contributed to a splendid effect of colour, light, and shade. Strong in good intentions, but weak in art-education, these pious monks produced, it must be confessed, but ludicrous pictures. The same may be said of all the tapestry of the time, used in the much-vaunted good old times to cover the bare, cold, and comfortless walls of houses. Early tapestry, with its grim horrors, exists in many old English castles and halls. The specimens in the smaller Banqueting Hall at Hampton Court exhibit the ludicrous drawing and grimly grotesque combinations of figures so characteristic of early efforts in art. This first epoch in caricature may be concluded by three illustrations selected from ancient manuscripts. One is a satire GROUP 9, Page 87. DRAWN BY Ft. W. BUSS. M. S. S. AND EARLY CARICATURES. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 37 on the preposterous height of ladies' head-dresses in the reign of Edward IV. (See Group 9.) The waggish illuminator has drawn the pig upon stilts, in the margin of a MS. copy of Froissart's Chronicle, now in the Harleian collection at the British Museum. The other example is selected from a MS. in the King's Library, also at the Museum. It is called the horned head-dress, and shows to what absurdities fashion will lead " the gentler sex." It is a satire on ladies more fond of dress and display than of feminine virtue. A famous monk, Thomas Conecte, attacked this monstrosity so vigorously, that in the middle of his sermon many of the women tore off their horned caps and made a bonfire of them within sight of the pulpit ! Even the rabble were so roused by his preaching, that they pelted with stones any fair one wear- ing this absurd head-dress. But alas ! for religion and common sense when opposed to fashion ! No sooner had his reverence departed, " than the women who, like snails in a fright, had withdrawn their horns, shot them out again as soon as the danger was over." The centre illustration is a very curious one, as it belonged to Mary Tudor, and is selected from her psalter. Her Majesty, bigot as she was, must have been insensible to satire or she could not have endured this caricature. It is drawn on vellum, in outline, and but slightly coloured. The subject is a satire on the clergy. A fox, personating a bishop, addresses a cunning discourse to an assemblage of stupid birds, who listen to him in perfect innocence, while the wily fox debates within himself which of them shall be his first victim, and in what way he may accomplish the destruction of the whole lot. This phase of caricature art, of which numerous examples are given in Mr. Wright's exhaustive work, was succeeded by the great invention which was to revolutionise society, to distribute knowledge over the civilised world, and in its more humble capacity to prove a wonderful aid to the art of caricature and the general diffusion of these satirical productions. FOLIO V. CARICATURE FROM THE INVENTION OF WOOD ENGRAVING TO THXT OF LINE ENGRAVING. Invention of Printing. — Chinese Origin. — Playing Cards. — Earliest Woodcut. — Value of MSS. — Pr.nting by Gutenberg, Fust, Schceffer and Coster. — Earliest known Political Caricature. — Printing in England by Caxton, Pynson, and Wynkyn de Worde. — Wood Engraving as practised by the Chinese. — Present mode of preparing the Blocks and of Engraving. — Colouring. — Tittle Tattle stencilled. ^HE invention of the art of printing, like most other great inventions, was the concentration or accumulation by one powerful mind of many previous steps in one direction. It consists of the employment of a sister art, that of sculpture, for the production of a matrix or means of multiplying any particular design or inscription. The idea of multiplying designs, by means of sculptured stamps, appears to have been of very early origin in China, and it is probable that Chinese block-books may have been brought to Europe by travellers or mariners. This point, however, remains to the present hour, an unsettled one. The new invention appears to have been first applied in Europe, about the year 141 8, to the production of the pips or ornaments for playing-cards. The mere outlines were printed, consisting of bells, vases, flowers, or other devices for the suites ; these were filled in with colour applied by the hand. A great trade in cards soon arose, as Nurnberg, Augsberg, and Ulm produced them in great quantities for exportation. The first woodcut with a date to it appeared in 1423, not very long after the date of printed playing- cards. The subject is St. Christopher carrying the infant Saviour across a river. As a work of art it is simply ridiculous, — an in- voluntary caricature ; but funny as it may be in this respect, it is very valuable as an example of the first separate subject engraved on wood. The only known copy is now in Lord Spencer's library. AN ESSAY ON ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 3^ From the existence of seals, signets, coins, and stamps for various purposes from the earliest times, it appears extraordinary that impressions from these matrices never suggested the applica- tion of stamps to the multiplying of books or of designs, especially as the labour of the scribe was expensive and tedious, when employed on manuscripts of the best kind. It is very possible that printing, like many other arts and inventions known to modern times, may have been stumbled on by individuals ; but for want of discernment, perseverance, money, or other favourable circumstances, as repeatedly lost. At this time, manuscript books were very valuable, and only to be obtained by wealthy men ; add to this the coloured or illuminated designs they contained, and the possession of a manuscript book will be seen to have been indeed amongst the most highly prized property. The Bible and numerous works of devotion must have been locked up at this time in the cabinets of royal, noble, or wealthy personages, and, except from passages read by the clergy, the mass of the people remained in ignorance of the contents of this gift of God to man. A natural result of this state of things was a desire to imitate these costly books by some means, through which copies could be multiplied at pleasure. Honesty compels the confession, that to a desire to pass off imitative manuscripts as real ones, civilisation owes one of its greatest blessings — Printing. At this date playing-cards were printed and in use, and possibly Chinese block-books were occasionally met with. The idea of transferring a portion of manuscript to a wooden block, and then cutting away all the white part so as thus to procure a stamp, which when blacked with a greasy material would give an impression on vellum or paper, appears to have been self-suggestive, and lying ready for adoption. The great honour of having acted on this idea is divided between John Gutenberg of Strasburg, John Faust of Mayence, Peter Schoeffer of Gernsheim, and Lawrence Coster of Haarlem. These may at first have been block-printers, for the " Biblia Pauperam," or " Poor Man's Bible," dates from 1423, and is a block-book, printed only on one side. The designs cut on wood are intensely funny, and are unintentional caricatures. Gutenberg began to print about 1436, and has the honour of inventing movable letters, cut in wood. Metal types are attributed to Faust and Gutenberg ; but Peter Schceffer is the inventor of casting movable letters in moulds. These early printed books are beautiful specimens of imitative manuscripts and of designs, which by the after appli- cation of colour resembled the illuminations in MSS. AN ESS A Y ON Caricature as an art may be said to have only been awaiting the wonderful and glorious invention of printing to burst forth into immense popularity. Upon the authority of Mr. Thomas Wright, the earliest known intentional political caricature dates from 1499. ^ was drawn on a block and engraved with much ability. The subject is called the " Political Game of Cards." The Pope, Louis XII., Henry VII., the Swiss Representative, the King of Spain, the Doge of Venice, the Duke of Milan, and other per- sonages, are seated at table, trying to outwit each other at cards. William Caxton has the great honour of introducing the blessing of printing into England in 1467. The illustration of early printing in Group 9 is from the press of Caxton, and is selected from his " Polychronicon," a small folio dated 1482. Neither the name of the designer nor of the engraver is known, but the comic intention is evident. The design illustrates this passage in the " Polychronicon." These strange fellows " lye down ryghte in the somer time, and defende themselves with the shadow of their feet from the hete of the sonne." A copy of this curious little book realised ^365 at the sale of Mr. Perkins's library. Under this caricature is one from Brandt's " Ship of Fools," date 1494. This cut is selected from an English version, printed by Pynson in 1509 ; a copy brought ^130 at Mr. Perkins's sale. The satire consists of a wealthy fool, who buys books for show, not being able to read one word in them. Another fool with cap and bells is being puffed up by Satan, who uses the common domestic machine, the bellows, for the purpose. This is from an old book, printed by Wynkyn de Worde, date 15 17. Caxton's types indicate their purchase in Holland or Flanders ; doubtless these illustrations were procured in one of those countries, and brought by him to his printing office in Westminster. As at that time no designer on wood, or wood engraver, was to be found in England, these rude cuts must have been executed by Dutch or Flemish artists. Engraving on wood was greatly advanced by Italian and German artists, Ugo da Carpi, and even Raffaelle, Louis Cranach, and Hans Burgmair. Their designs were freely drawn, and very superior to those rude engravings in Caxton's books. The new art of printing was of essential use to caricature, from the ease with which copies of books could be multiplied ; conse- quently, books of this date are found profusely illustrated with designs of a rude kind of execution. The earliest wood engravers, the Chinese, pursue this method. The required inscription or design is painted or written on ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 41 thin paper, then pasted down on a smooth block of pear-tree wood ; on removing the paper the block is impressed with the original writing, but reversed. By using sharp chisels, called gravers, the white parts of the block can be easily removed, leaving the black letters standing up, or in relief. Now, if a black greasy pigment be dabbed over this engraved block, and a piece of damped paper laid on it, and pressure applied, an impression of the black letters reading in the right way, from left to right, will be obtained. This mode of engraving by excision of the white parts gives an impression from the surface, and is, therefore, called surface-printing. Designs can be transferred in a precisely similar manner to the block, and then engraved. The present method consists of a very smooth block of box- wood, of the thickness called " type height," that is, on a level with type. A little powdered Flanders brick and white chalk are spread in a damp state over the block ; when dry, the super- fluous powder is rubbed off by the finger. The design is then made on the block, using an HH. black-lead pencil. The wood engraver removes the white parts by the use of different gravers, and finishes the work. In the present book examples of rude wood- engraving are given in Groups 1, 7, 9. This kind of engraving was to a great extent disused in England about 1600, except for the rudest work, such as ballads, broadsheets, and the lowest productions of the press. For its revival in England reference must be made to Folio 1 i. In the collection of satirical prints at the British Museum is a curious example of many coarse woodcuts upon one broad-sheet. It is entitled "Tittle Tattle," date 1604 ; it satirises the mischievous habit of gossiping on every possible occasion — births, marriages, deaths, marketing, dining, drinking, at church, in fact always and everywhere. This scarce and well-directed caricature has traces of rude colour applied to it by stencilling, that is, by having holes cut in parchment, of shapes and sizes corresponding to the forms of the print. The required colour was then spread with a soft brush passed over the parchment, and only applied where the cut spaces permitted it. Colour was thus employed for the early times of wood-engraving, especially for the decoration of playing- cards and books of devotion, as a substitute for illumination in MSS. G FOLIO VI. CARICATURE FROM WOOD-ENGRAVING TO LINE-ENGRAVING. Invention of Engraving on Metal. — Nielli. — Thomaso Finneguerra. — Artists of the 15th Century.— First Book Published with Prints from Metal Plates. — Pure Graver Work. — Invention of Etching. — Date, 1 5 1 5, of Earliest Etching. — "Biting In," and "Stopping Out," applied. — Etched Example. — "Batman's Doom," 1518. — Holbein's "Dance of Death." — Nobody. — Coarse Wood-cuts. — The English in 161 7. — "Mad Fashions," 1642. — W. Hollar, 1626. — James I. — Gunpowder Plot. — Laud. — Charles II. with his Nose to the Grindstone. — J. Callot, 1592.— His Influence on the Art of Etching. ARICATURE, or design generally, drawn and engraved on blocks, received a severe blow by the invention of engraving on metallic plates. This enormous step in art, though almost superseding separate prints from wood blocks, wonderfully aided the progress of carica- ture, and of the entire arts of design. Monumental brasses, executed by means of gravers and chisels, appeared much earlier, or about 1284, and were introduced in the walls and on the pavements of English and continental churches. These early works are all so comic as to belong to unintentional caricature. Vessels of gold or silver had been engraved for ages with various designs ; and wood engraving and printing had been invented a few years before, all leading to a result which seemed to invite and to provoke discovery; yet it was not until 1460 that Thomaso Finneguerra, a Florentine goldsmith, accidentally discovered that the lines of an engraving on a silver dish or vessel he had just completed would, on being filled in with a black greasy pigment, yield a beautifully clear impression. This is neither more, nor less than line-engraving. Impressions from such engravings on silver and gold are collected, and bound in several volumes, lettered " Nielli," from the peculiar black and hard composition with which AN ESSAY ON ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. +3 the lines were filled. These are in the Print Room at the British Museum, and are full of fancy in invention, but rather formal in execution, being pure "graver-work." This novel application of the graver created a sensation amongst the artists of the fifteenth century ; and Marc Antonio, Baccio Baldini, Botti- celli, and Andrea Mantegna, engraved numerous designs more or less successfully. The first book, ornamented with designs, engraved on copper plates, was an edition of Dante's " Inferno," dated 1481. Engraving on metal plates is a totally reverse process to engraving on wood. The impression or print is obtained in the former case, from furrows or lines cut in the metal. These lines hold the ink, and when the face of the plate is polished, damped paper laid over the plate, and the whole forced under a roller, the ink is absorbed by the paper, and the result is a print with black lines, the surface of the plate white or dark according to the nature of the work. This is called " incised''' or " cut in," engraving ; while the other, wood-engraving, is called " excised,'' 1 or " cut out," engraving, the impression being, obtained from the surface of the letters in relief, and called " surface-printing." The newly applied art of engraving in line on metal, besides requiring gravers to cut the lines more or less deep and wide, was greatly aided by the "dry point," which is merely a sharp steel point used to make scratches on the metal. Skies, delicate grey tints, and general softening of effect are produced by a judicious use of the "dry point." Engravings, caricatures, or other works executed in metal between 1461 and 15 15, may be classed as pure line engraving, which style has, more or less, always been adhered to by artists having great command over that difficult instrument, the graver. Group 10, engraved by John Vickars, date 1641, is an example of a caricature on the Pope. It is executed in the clear style which indicates the use of the graver only. Time is here quietly carrying off the Pope, loaded with his ecclesiastical paraphernalia; nor does his holiness appear much troubled by his transit, as he is simply going home, after in vain trying to settle down with his Romish doctrines in England. This couplet is inscribed under the print : — " This burden back to Rome I'll beare again. From thence it came, there let it still remain." . 44- AN ESS AT ON Invention of Etching. The year 1 5 1 5 is an important one to the student of caricature or pictorial satire, as well as to art generally. This was the date of the invention of etching, by which the difficult and laborious use of the graver could be entirely superseded. By means of etching, any designer unskilled in the management of the graver could produce effects quite adequate to his wishes. It permitted the introduction of numerous figures, variety and quantity of detail, gradations of tone, and entire freedom of drawing. To etching, the art of caricature owes almost all its success, in later times ; for its reign in regard to graphic satire lasted three hundred years. Its importance to caricature can be judged of by the fact, that any graphic satirist could, without employing a line-engraver, produce his satiric work in perfect freedom, and with the freshness and spirit ever belonging to original efforts. Michael Wolgemut, the master of Albert Diirer, is said to have invented the art of etching ; but this is doubtful. The celebrated "cannon landscape" by Diirer is the earliest etching, with his signature, dated 15 18. Two others, dated 15 15 and 1 5 1 6, are attributed to him ; all show an infant state of this art. The following sketch of the practice of etching will explain its great importance to the subject of caricature. The satirist having made his design on paper, must transfer this design to the metal- plate. The plate of iron, steel, or copper being highly polished, is warmed and smeared over with "etching ground," a mixture of wax, asphaltum, gum mastic, and resin, tied up in a small bag of silk, about the size of a walnut. This is equally and smoothly distributed over the plate by means of a " dabber," which is made by enclosing some wadding in a piece of silk, tied tightly up, the part so tied being used as a handle. While the plate is warm, its surface is blackened by four or five wax tapers, twisted together. On cooling, the plate presents a black, varnished appearance, and is ready to receive the transfer ; this can be done in various ways, but the simplest is to rub the back of the drawing with vermilion ; the reddened side should be laid on the plate, and secured at the corners with wax. If, with an ivory point, the outlines be traced over, they will, on removing the original drawing, be found transferred to the varnished plate. The " etching " now properly begins, by drawing on the transferred lines with a steel point, quite through the etching ground, and then putting in the shadings ENGLISH GRAPHIC SA TIRE. 45 with lines, single or crossed, as may be required. This part of the work is most important, and requires a considerable amount of practice in doubling" the line where great strength is required, and in regulating the force applied to the steel-point or etching-needle. The etching completed, the next process is to corrode the lines, or " bite" them, as it is called. This may be done by immersing the plate in a flat dish filled with nitric acid, diluted with one half of water. Corrosive action imme- diately begins, bubbles arise, which should be swept away with a feather. How long the corroding or " biting in " should continue, depends upon the kind of work etched, and the effect required : here also great practice is necessary. To remove the etching ground, the plate should be washed with water and dried ; on applying heat the varnish can be wiped off, the plate cleaned with spirit of turpentine, and polished with whiting. The plate is then ready to be "proved " at the copper-plate printing-press. This account of etching and " biting-in "is of the most simple kind, and represents the art as it was practised at its first inven- tion. Albert Diirer, and other artists of his time, thus produced designs resembling in a great degree those executed by the graver. Very pretty and delicate effects can thus be obtained, but strength and variety of line require an after process, which was soon discovered, and is called " stopping out." This consists in covering overall those parts of the etching sufficiently "bitten" with a varnish, which will resist the action of the acid ; this varnish is named "Brunswick black." The part not "stopped out," on being again exposed to the acid, will be again corroded, and the uncovered lines made deeper and wider, according to the strength intended ; by again covering up or " stopping out " other parts, and again exposing the plate to the action of the acid, still greater sirength of line can be obtained, and by repeating this process, very beautiful and powerful results may be secured without one touch of the graver. This is the mode of execution by which, for more than two centuries, thousands upon thousands of caricatures and other pictorial satiric efforts have been pro- duced. Etching, combined with lines cut and finished by the graver and " dry point," constitutes the practice of line-engraving in its highest state. The example of caricature by the aid of etching (on Group 1 i) is free in its drawing and invention, and clearly shows the appli- cability of this process to produce satirical prints. " Batman's Doom" is the name of the print, its date is 1581, its object evident. It is curious, also, as being one, if not the earliest, 46 AN ESSAY ON instance of various vessels and other objects so grouped as to form a head or portrait. In this fancy-portrait of the Pope are introduced the papal artillery, bell, book, censer, and candle, for anathematizing nations or individuals. A fish forms the nose, the holy wafer an eye ; the lips and cheek are formed by vessels used by the priests. The tiara is a bell, the other parts are books, a throne, and portions of ecclesiastical vestments ; thus far is mere symbolism. Satire appears by a bishop-wolf devouring a lamb, emblematic of papal cruelty ; a serpent holding a rosary denotes cunning and superstition. The ornaments on the left side consist of an ass in spectacles, poring in vain over a book — Igno- rance ; a hog decked out with a college-cap — Gluttony ; but the great point of the design is below, on the platform ; where, in clouds, appear the wounded feet of a crucified Saviour, the only part not hidden by the Popish implements. The evident intention of this caricature is to show how the traditions, doctrines, and ceremonials of the Romish Church have obscured, from the sight of men, the true and pure gospel of Christ. The feet of our Lord rest upon the royal heraldic supporters, a lion and a dragon, symbolizing the support of Protestantism by Queen Elizabeth. At this time attacks on the Romish Church were permitted in England and other countries which had protested against the doctrines of that Church. But Protestant supporters and caricaturists did not carry everything their own way, for satiric hits flew about from Romanist to Protestant, and vice versa, like snowballs amongst boys on a wintry morning. Luther was caricatured, to an extraordinary extent in German}', as a fat, jolly monk, decked out with a fool's cap and bells. In another example, Satan is playing the bagpipes, the bag being a head of Luther, and the pipe his nose, upon which the demon discourses diabolic music. Luther and his wife were also mercilessly caricatured and satirised. One of the most remarkable inventions of the caricaturist is that of " Nobody ; " Group 12 ; its date is 1600, when political matters had been sadly muddled, and this celebrated personage was punished. This is one of the happiest and most original inventions, and from its capability of fun became at once adopted by satirical writers and artists. An anonymous comedy was published, called Somebody and A r obody, in which this gentleman makes his appearance. This important personage is a great favourite with all of us, high or low ; whether in the " Circumlocution Office," or where the study is " How not to GROUP 12. (Page 47. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE 47 do it." " Nobody " has existed, and still exists, not merely in old- fashioned England, but in all countries, to " meddle and muddle." " Nobody " became the rage ; he was painted on sign-boards, and figured in masques and masquerades. " Nobody" has had his life and actions celebrated principally by the etching-needle. So much has he been delineated by pen and pencil, that we almost persuade ourselves that he must be " Somebody." However, an examina- tion of his peculiar conformation undeceives us. Legs and thighs joined on to a head, and arms surmounting a huge pair of trunk hose, convince us that he is indeed " nobody." This is the original of a large family of " Nobodies " produced by subsequent carica- turists. This whimsical idea has been adopted more frequently than many others, because the idea is applicable to all times and to all countries, simply by changing or modernising the costume. In Group 12 is presented a design much used by artists, serious and satirical, ancient and modern. It is a personifi- cation of Death, by a skeleton complete, or one partially covered with muscles. It belongs to the Middle Ages, and originated about the beginning of the thirteenth century, in a legend relating an interview between three living and three dead men. Saint Macarius is supposed to have invented the legend. About the early part of the fifteenth century, some satirist applied the idea to all ranks of society ; skeletons, as the emblems of death, were dancing off wildly with the living ; this became known as " The Dance of Death," or " The Danse Macabre," from St. Ma- carius' s name. The idea became extremely popular, skeletons being painted on the walls of churches, and even on covered bridges. The illustration selected is from the series called " The Dance of Death." It represents a wealthy German nobleman and his newly-married wife ; he appears greatly enamoured of her ; but her gaze is directed to a grotesque skeleton beating a drum, indicating that the death of the lady is near. The engraving is beautifully executed in line by the Chevalier de Mechel, after Holbein's design. The entire series consists of forty-seven subjects, in the course of which Death is present with emperors, kings, statesmen, warriors, merchants, thieves, drunkards, gamblers, monks, nuns, lovers, old men, and children. The coarsely-executed wood block is curious as a violent caricature on the fashions and ideas current in 1642 or 1643. As a work of art in drawing and execution it is simply contemptible, but its invention is remarkable and original. It is entitled " Mad Fashions, or, Fashions all out of Fashion," or an "Emblem of 4 3 AN ESSAY ON these distracted Times; " it would appear to have been designed and engraved by John Taylor. The idea is that the world is turned upside down, and that everything is wrong and contrary to its natural order. It is a caricature upon the acts of the Republicans, in their endeavours to make Charles I. keep his promises, by which, according to the caricaturist's ideas, the world was turned upside down. In these " Mad Fashions," an unfortunate wight has lost his eyes, or rather these necessary organs of vision are wrongly placed, being at the side of his head instead of in front, so that he cannot see his way straight- forward ; this is a sly satire at the English people, who, blinded by rage at the false promises of their king, could not see their way in a truly loyal course. Civil war, or rather uncivil war, had broken out, and the order of society reversed ; this the caricaturist indicates by the man's legs being where his arms should be. The insecurity of his position is shown by his walking on his hands, his shoulders growing from the lower part of the body. No doubt this rude woodcut was an emanation from the Cavalier side of the warlike question then agitated between Charles and his Parliament. To the adherents of " Sacred Majesty" of course all went wrong, so in this graphic squib, the cart goes before the horse, the horse drives the cart. The barrow wheels the man, the man rolls along with a wheel under his head. The hare hunts the hounds, the mouse pursues the cat. Fishes fly in the air, and the flame of a candle burns downwards — which crowns these absurdities. Our native caricaturists at this time appear to have possessed but very little talent in design or in execution, their efforts for the most part being confined to very rough woodcuts intended for illustrations to the broadsheets then published. Of this kind is a rude woodcut copied from a curious satirical work entitled " Coryat's crudities," dated 15 17. The illustration ridicules the numerous changes of fashion, which then took place. The "gents" of that period seemed to have been sadly puzzled how to make them- selves sufficiently conspicuous and ridiculous in dress. These votaries of fashion, unable to determine upon the next absurdity, are said by the caricaturist to stand naked while they are deliber- ating upon the cut of their clothes. These lines are also supposed to be uttered by the naked gentleman : — " I am an Englyshman and naked I stand here, Musing in my mynde what rayment I shall weare ; For now I will weare this, and now I will weare that, Now I will weare I cannot tell what ! " The gentleman stands shivering, and presents a ridiculous ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 4*< picture of uncertainty. He holds a pair of shears in one hand, and has a roll of good woollen-cloth on his arm. In the back- ground are rolls of cloth, and an attempt to represent the flax or the cotton plant. The caricaturist is supposed to be Andrew Borde, of merry reputation, and jester to Henry VIII. Caricature in England during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries scarcely existed, except by the importation of carica- tures and caricaturists from Germany, Holland, and France. Wenceslaus Hollar, a native of Prague, in Bohemia, was born in 1607, and brought by the Earl of Arundel to England, where he became a permanent resident. For delicacy and finish he was unrivalled as an etcher and engraver. His works amount to two thousand four hundred subjects. He caricatured, or rather savagely satirised, King James L, accusing the King of poison- ing the young prince by the agency of a quack, Dr. Lambe, date 1626. This appears to be a vile calumny on James I. The scandal of the time asserted that Carr, on his trial, was expected to accuse the King of attempting to murder his son, and that two men with cloaks were stationed behind Carr ready to stifle him, if he uttered one word of the accusation. The " British Solomon " was bad enough, but not so bad as to murder his own child. "Gunpowder treason and plot!" presented a glorious and never-ending subject for caricatures, pictures, burlesques, satires, lampoons, and novels, from the time of Martin Droeschuet, to our own George Cruikshank. The press teemed with caricatures or symbolic representations of the political events of that date, November 5, 1605. Of course the Pope and his great supporter, Satan, with an array of priests, and the Kings of France and Spain, are all engaged in their plot, while Guido Fawkes, or poor old Guy, sneaks off with matches and a dark lantern to the cellar under the old Houses of Parliament. W. Marshall, date 161 7, engraved a plate caricaturing the practice of smoking. Group 12 contains the caricature head of a wolf, dressed in the highest style of fashion, 1646. It is called "England's Wolfe," a satire on the successes of Prince Rupert, and is very well drawn. On the other side, dated 1647, the head of Folly is given, from a print in the British Museum called the picture of "an English Persecutor," being ridden by Folly; it is freely drawn. In the centre of the lower part of this group is a repre- sentation of " The Pope Ass." It is a German print, and states that the pope can expound Scripture as well as an ass can play on the bagpipes. 11 AN ESSAY ON About this date appeared a personal caricature of the notorious Sir Giles Mompesson, the original of Sir Giles Overreach in Massinger's play of A New Way to Pay Old Debts. He appears to have been a greedy monopolist and a bad man. Parliament condemned him to be publicly degraded from his rank, March 17, 1620. It is a line engraving well and firmly executed. On Group 1 2 is a caricature of William Laud, the notorious Archbishop of Canterbury, a greedy pluralist and persecutor of the Puritans. His insolence, cruelty, and bigotry brought him to the block in 1645. His Grace of Canterbury delighted in having men's ears cropped, noses slit, and foreheads branded, besides inflicting fine and imprisonment on his unfortunate victims. Conduct so vile raised the popular indignation against him to such an extent that an enraged mob attacked him in his palace at Lambeth, when he ran great risk of being killed. The coarse woodcut on this group is one of a set of four ; they are entitled " Lambeth Faire," a new play, called " Canterbury," in four acts. The artist's name is unknown, nor does it matter, for the cuts are very bad. In " Act I. the Archbishop of Can- terbury having variety of dainties, is not satisfied till he be fed with tippetts of men's ears;" in "Act II. he hath his nose to the grindstone;" in "Act III. he is put into a birdcage with his con- fessor;" in "Act IV. the jester tells the King the story." The illustration is from Act II. He hath his nose to the grindstone truly enough when the Archbishop was a state prisoner in the Tower of London. "He hath his nose to the grindstone" is inscribed on the print. This grindstone idea, "grinding the noses of the poor!" is a popular one, and has been many times repeated. Another instance is given in the same Group, No. 12. The design is etched in an open style, and tolerably well ; it forms the top of a broadsheet, with letterpress doggerel lines beneath, published July 14, 1 65 1. The original is in the collection of caricatures at the British Museum. Before the Presbyterians in Scotland offered the young Prince Charles the crown, they compelled him to consent to many humiliating conditions, ridiculed in this caricature. The title of the print is, " The Scots holding their young kinge's nose to the grindstone." Here Jack Presbyter holds the nose of the young King on to the grindstone, while the Scots, or Jockie, turns it. Jockey. I, Jockey, turn the stone of all your plots, For none turnes faster than the turne-coat Scots. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 5< Presbyter. We for our ends did make thee king, be sure, Not to rule us, we will not that endure. King. You deep dissemblers, I know what you doe, And for revenge's sake, I will dissemble too. The remaining design is an etching of considerable merit ; it represents, after the antique, Janus, a double-faced god — a com- pound of Romanism and Protestantism. Satan, the fiend of Signorelli and of Michael Angelo, pleased at the meeting, grins horribly a ghastly smile and prepares to seize the Romanist at once, leaving the Protestant. On the continent Callot, 1592, achieved great fame as an etcher and engraver of caricature and burlesque. He at first confined his practice to the graver alone, but afterwards he etched with wonderful rapidity and freedom. With great power as an artist, a vagabond feeling, caught during a sojourn of seven or eight weeks with a band of gipsies, so completely overcame him, that he vainly essayed serious art, and produced instead extraordinary comic and burlesque designs. His talent was quite wonderful for this capricious style of art, and he is considered as one of the most eminent French artists. His death took place in 1635. FOLIO VII. Engravings in Line, and Etchings by Dutch Artists. — Romayn de Hooghe.— Caricatures on Cromwell. — W. Marshall, 1648. — Dutch Hostility. — Admiral Blake. — The Pope and Satan. — Enactments against Caricatures. — Richard Cromwell. — Charles II. restored. — Charles II. by Gaywood. — England as a Cow. — Whig and Tory. — Death of Charles II., 1685. — Prince Rupert learns Mezzotint from Louis von Siegel. — James II. — The Popish Successor. — Faithorne, 1680. — Landing of the Prince of Orange, November 5, 1688. ■ — Caricatures on Mary of Modena, Father Petre. and the Pretender. — "Perkin's Triumph," by Mosley. — Flight of James II. — His Death in 1701. W5IP%HE great improvement in engraving- and etching on (y*y5w co PP er or ' ron plates* and the ease by which satiric vf^ll&l designs could be executed, gradually supplanted design- ^^y^sl in S and engraving on wood, consequently this formerly W&) very popular mode of illustration declined in talent till m** it became so bad, that it was only applied to coarse broad- sheets and the cheapest productions of the press. The exile of the Stuarts, the sympathy of their supporters, and the resi- dence of Charles II. in Holland, gave employment in caricature to Dutch artists. Hundreds of elaborate and well-engraved caricatures appeared in London, emanating from numerous clever Dutch artists, but these works were generally published anony- mously, or with fictitious names. Their object was to support the exiled King and to satirise Cromwell. The school of Callot produced Delia Bella and Romayn de Hooghe, whose works contain crowds of figures engaged in war- tumults and in public processions. For years the works of these great masters had found their way into England, yet very little effect, if any, was produced on our native art, for it still remained in a very low state. During the seventeenth century, Hollar lived permanently in this country. A fine portrait engraver, Faithorne, though a native of England, studied his art in France, but as he engraved no caricatures a longer notice of this fine AN ESSAY ON ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 53 engraver of portraits is not needed in this place. All the real art at this time emanated from Hollar. He lived in Gardiner's Lane, Westminster, working for the booksellers at the rate of fourpence per hour, measuring his time by an hour-glass. In spite of his great popularity and the immense number of his works, he fell into distress, and died on March 28, 1677. A badly-engraved anonymous print, satirising the Romish party, alludes to the Gunpowder Plot. It presents the regular idea, the Pope and his priests concocting the Plot under a tent. An elaborately-etched plate appeared in 1649. The artist's name is not put, but it is doubtless by a Dutch engraver, engaged by the Cavalier party in the interest of the exiled Prince Charles. In this satiric production, Oliver Cromwell, who was thoroughly hated by the Dutch, is represented standing near a large oak-tree. Clouds open over his head, and he is struck by lightning. A motto, " Sero sed serio," appears. Cromwell orders the tree to be felled; his Ironsides pull it down, and apply an axe to its root. The tree is loaded with the royal emblems, such as the crown, a Bible, Magna Charta, royal coat of arms, and the celebrated book, " EIKON BASIAIKH." Acorns are shaken off the tree and hogs eat them greedily. This elaborated work is entitled " The Royall Oake of Brittayne." A very large engraving, entitled " Magna Brittaniae Divisa," 1642, was published under the name of " Plans Vander-pill " — an assumed name, and the first of a long list of whimsical assumed names of artists. Caricature, or rather satiric symbolism, was exercised not only by W. Hollar, but by Bickham, Loggan, Herricks, Vaughan, Cross, R. White, W. Marshall, and others, who published under assumed names. Some little talent is shown by native etchers, but it must be conceded that for elaborate composition, freedom of drawing, excellent touches of personal caricature, and richness of light and shade, the works of Dutch artists were superior to those of England. W. Marshall, 1648, etched a design called " England's Miracles." Charles I. is represented in a boat ; the print is interesting to the student of graphic satire as being the original idea of introducing the heads of public men as crests to the waves of the sea. This idea was adopted in after times by Gillray, by Sey- mour, and other modern caricaturists. In one of the caricatures circulated at this period, Cromwell is represented as an ape, with the British Lion asleep in a cradle ; date 1649. "The Coming Descent of England" is the title. This subject is well designed, and etched on copper ; the lines 5 + AN ESSAY ON have been polished up, and deepened by the subsequent use of the graver. The Pope, in 1649, nas a novel appearance imparted to him by caricaturists, for in a print of this date he has three heads. Another caricature represents a head of the Pope as far as the mouth, the chin being - joined by a head of Satan. This idea has been used by subsequent caricaturists. Caricature, from the death of Charles I. to the latter part of Cromwell's career, was not very active; but still the Royal party occasionally and quietly indulged in attacks on the Lord Protector. It would appear that the principal subjects of the satirical prints of the time were suggested by supporters of the Royal party, and confided to Dutch artists. These works were then printed at Amsterdam, imported here, and clandestinely circulated by booksellers favourable to the Royal cause. Crom- well, by his firm and decided action with the Dutch, who took advantage of the English on every occasion, brought down upon his head a torrent of invective and savagely-conceived carica- tures. The Dutch, having espoused the Royal cause, treated the supporters of the Commonwealth, with Cromwell at its head, with marked disrespect ; the consequence was, that Crom- well commenced hostilities against Holland, and, in 1652, the Dutch Admirals Van Tromp, De Ruyter, and De Witt, met the English Admirals Blake and Ayescue. In one ' action Van Tromp was defeated by Blake and lost eleven ships. This caused the Dutch to sue for peace, and to be, if possible, more virulent against Cromwell than they were before. We may here allude to a new form of caricature. The old idea of playing-cards, designed originally for amusement, was now extended to the diffusion of political opinions. One set of these caricature cards was published in England, and most probably engraved in Holland. The object was to ridicule the principal parliamentary leaders. Another pack related to the Popish Conspiracy and the Rye House Plot ; one to the Mississippi Scheme ; and one to the South Sea Bubble. Most of these, doubtless, were by Dutch artists. Owing to the lapse of time and the general neglect of carica- tures, because it was customary then, as in the present day, to regard those productions as worthless, caricatures of the date of the Stuart and Cromwellian periods have become scarce, and can only be met with in a few private collections, and the large one at the British Museum. For this reason the specimens here given will possess an interest independent of their merits of execution. On Group 13 is a well -executed portrait of that great ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 5 5 Brewer of political storms and strong beer, Oliver Cromwell. He is represented in full armour, with the baton of military command. His sword is labelled " Rex terrse ;" his position is a difficult one to maintain, standing, as he does, on a slippery globe, inscribed " Locus lubricus." This bubble or globe is produced by Satanic agency, and, issuing from flames, indicates an origin by no means complimentary to the great Protector. This portrait of Cromwell is taken from a large print, entitled " The Royall Oake of Brit- tayne." The portrait of Oliver is not overcharged in the draw- ing, but the satirical element is found in the emblems of Satan, and the allusion to the uncertain or slippery foundation of the Protector's power. As might be expected, at this period of political earthquakes, when Englishmen of different parties were deadly foes to each other, satire was freely used, and, in its nature, was coarse, savage, and malignant. The faithlessness of King Charles I., and his high-handed acts, drove his Parliament into rebellion and brought him to the scaffold. Although the unfortunate King Charles had suffered the penalty of death for his political errors, the satirists, no longer having a live king to satirise, blackened his memory to their hearts' content. A caricature, called " The Kingdom's Monster Uncloaked from Heaven," appeared about 1648; in which the unfortunate King was savagely attacked. This effort had far more malignity of feeling than wit or humour. Amongst other violent effusions of the caricaturists of that period is a malicious print, which appeared three years after the King's execution ; its title is " The King of the Dead " — a cruel and low attempt to desecrate the memory of Charles. Cromwell himself, and his principal officers, however, came in for their full share of abuse and ridicule from the witty Cavaliers, and the Dutch artists they retained as caricaturists. Like all men who forcibly seize the reins of government, Cromwell could but ill brook the satirical truths in songs, lam- poons, and graphic satires put forth by the press in a manner by no means delicate. He therefore found it expedient to enact severe penalties against all persons who published libels or satires on his Highness. The consequence of this was, that a large number of satirical and libellous pamphlets and prints were written in English and Dutch, accompanied by caricatures, at the cost of the Royal party in England, and the intimates of the exiled princes in Holland, but cautiously sold in London. Some of these graphic satires were engraved on wood in a very coarse style of art, others etched upon copper with more care. As may 56 AN ESSAY ON be supposed, caricatures personally offensive to the Protector were secretly imported from Holland, and privately circulated amongst the friends of the dead King and the exiled one. The curious illustration on the upper part of Group 13, is part of a larger sub- ject published by the partisans of Cromwell, having an inscription in Dutch and another in English. Readers of history know that Cromwell delivered a rigmarole, called a speech, most unparlia- mentary in its tone and decidedly personal. Pointing to the door with his cane, he said "Begone!" after which his Ironsides entered the House of Commons, and Cromwell performed the coup d'etat imitated in France ; after which the members sneaked out one by one. Oliver ordered the mace to be removed, and locking the doors of the legislative chamber, quietly pocketed the keys and walked away ! The spectacled owle bearing a candle, may be taken as a symbol of parliamentary sagacity, and an allusion -to some speech or act which does not appear in the history of the times. The spectacles and owle are introduced into one or more caricatures subsequent to this date. The peacock holds a Diogenic lantern, and a broom by which the Commons House was clean swept ! Such was Oliver's short way of dissolving the Long Parliament. A large and well-engraved portrait of the Protector is on Group 13 ; it is by a Dutch artist, and selected from a broad- sheet of the time. Cromwell here figures as a Pope, wearing a triple crown, indicating the kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland. The crown is put on his head, and held there by a heraldic monster — a griffin ! Peacock's feathers are added, to ridicule the vanity which placed the great Protector on the throne of the heaven-born Stuarts. At this period, England, by the firmness and daring of Crom- well, had reached a high point of national glory. At no part of England's history was this country more respected abroad, and Hallam states, in his "Constitutional History," "that the maritime glory of England may first be traced from the era of the Common- wealth, in a track of continuous light." The great Admiral Blake made the Dutch tremble in their shoes, and the English flag every- where respected. Cromwell's courage, resolution, and total independence of any foreign sovereign, made him also act with promptitude, and strike with force, on any slight or insult offered to England. As might be expected, a host of talented Dutch artists exerted their utmost abilities in reviling the great Protector, and accusing him of the most abominable cruelty. In these cari- catures, Cromwell is represented as trampling upon some writhing human form, symbolic of England, Ireland, Scotland, France, or GROUP 13. (Page 56. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 57 Holland. Sometimes he is drawn in the act of disembowelling' his victim. Perfidy crowns him with vipers in one print, while in another he is associated with a wolf, or some other savage beast of prey. No names of artists appear" to these attacks, as it was decidedly unsafe to put any. Boldness and freedom of execution vie with the audacity of the satire. The feelings entertained abroad of Cromwell's continental policy are forcibly expressed in a freely- executed etching, in which he is represented squeezing a French- man to death under his left arm, while, with his right arm, he is drawing out the bowels of a Dutchman ! This is an allusion to the chastisement the Dutch had received at sea, and the heavy fine of ^300,000 sterling which they had to pay. In this carica- ture, Cromwell tramples on a Scotchman, while an Irishman crouches between his legs. A halter and an axe are hanging up ready for him, and two larg-e bags, crammed full of gold squeezed out of the malignants, are assigned to the Protector. A curious state of a serious portrait of Cromwell is in the British Museum collection. To suit the temper of the time, the artist has turned this portrait into a caricature, by adding spectacles, reddening his nose, and adorning his mouth with a pipe ; an owl sits on Crom- well's shoulder, and on his hat is a fine display of stag's horns. Cromwell's death, at the age of sixty, on September 3, 1658, the anniversary of his victories at Dunbar and Worcester, was the commencement of a total change in the political state of England. His son Richard ruled as Protector but for a short time. A caricature of Richard Cromwell represents him as a cooper, breaking up a cask with a sledge-hammer. The cask is a very large one, and is so shattered that it allows the escape of a multitude of spectacled owls bearing candles ; a symbol, doubtless, of the sagacity of members of the House of Commons alluded to on page 56. Richard Cromwell, on the death of his father, Oliver, became Lord Protector, but unable, by his quiet, amiable disposition, to cope with the restless men by whom he was sur- rounded, resigned his high position April 22, 1659. This weak son of a great man lived in honourable retirement, at Cheshunt, until 171 2, when he died, at the age of eighty-six. A struggle for power by a few political adventurers now produced so much disorder, that General Monk marched from Scotland at the head of a considerable army, and was instru- mental in the election of a new Parliament. After much delibe- ration, the members decided to invite the King Charles II. to the throne of his father, and on May 29, 1660, his Sacred Majesty arrived in England. Then came the bonfires, drunken- 1 5» AN ESSAF ON ness, obscenity, and servility of the glorious Restoration ! The Merry Monarch graciously permitted the decaying bodies of Cromwell, Ireton, and Bradshaw, to be dragged from their graves and gibbeted at Tyburn ! In Pennant's " London," one of the valuable books in the Print Room of the British Museum, is a print of which a copy is given on Group 13. A decayed head of Cromwell is here represented, crowned with laurel but impaled on a. spike, as if ready for Temple Bar. It reposes on an axe, and is decorated with a halter joined to a reversed crown and sceptre ; a sword and pair of scales indicate that justice has at last been done. The etched centre head on Group 13 is a portrait of Charles II., by Gaywood, a pupil of the celebrated Hollar ; the date is 1660. This portrait is selected from a print which is remarkable for representing England as a cow. His Majesty is feeding her, while some bishops and a king are riding on her back and whip- ping her. In this way the caricaturist records the restoration of the bishops, and the infamous degradation of England to the King of France. The execution of the print is laboured, and it has but small claims as a work of art. The remaining illustration is a cleverly-etched design representing Sir Thomas Fairfax. He was accused of permitting himself to become a tool in the hands of Cromwell. The satirist has placed him under a gibbet, and he holds up the bleeding head of Charles I. ; in his right hand he grasps a blood-stained axe ; behind him is a tiger, emblematic of savage feelings. One of the caricatures of this period represents Charles II. sitting on his throne, the crown falling off his head; a sly hit by the puritanical party, alluding to his licentiousness and his degraded position as a pensioner of the French King. Charles, the hero of a so-called glorious Restoration, by his accession to the throne of England, quieted the Cavalier party, was on friendly terms with France and Holland, and had in a great measure silenced the Puritans. It would appear that little encouragement was given to native caricaturists, as these pro- ductions were mostly obtained from Holland. Few motives were found by the Dutch artists for the exercise of their talents, as the funds at the disposal of the Royal supporters were otherwise engaged, the Cavalier party now being in the ascendant. When we think of the rampant and barefaced vice exhibited by the King and the whole court, it can scarcely be believed that caricature did not attack actions and events so tempting to the graphic satirist. Caricatures in abundance must have been produced ; but from the ephemeral nature of these designs, they were probably laughed at for a time, then thrown aside and allowed to be destroyed. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 59 The blessings of Whiggism and Toryism originated in this delightful reign. Whig was a term applied to the country party ; it was also a name for sour milk, and for the conventicles in Scot- land. Tory was derived from the name given to Irish banditti in 1679. Finding a Parliament rather troublesome, Charles tried his hand on his father's fatal experiment, and for four or five years ruled despotically without one. How long this might have continued it is useless to inquire, as apoplexy settled the question on February 6, 1685. To Prince Rupert, the impetuous captain of Charles I., and the wiser counsellor of Charles II., is wrongly attributed the invention of a style of engraving called mezzotint. He was appointed governor of Windsor Castle, and in that ancient palace devoted himself to chemical experiments, painting, and engraving. It is said that on cleaning the barrel of his gun, the white rag, when drawn out, was found to be quite black with the powder and corrosion of the barrel, and that the thought struck him that some kind of engraving might be similarly produced. This pretty story about mezzotint being invented by Prince Rupert is very doubtful ; but probably a blackened gun rag suggested to Von Siegel the possibility of that style of engraving. Prince Rupert died on November 29, 1682. He engraved about twelve plates in mezzotint. One of these (which is the decollation of St. John, after a design by Spagnoletto) bears the date of 1658. The real inventor of this beautiful style of engraving was Louis von Siegel, a lieutenant -colonel in the service of the Landgrave of Hesse Cassel, from whom Prince Rupert learned the secret when in Holland, and brought it with him to England when he came over the second time in the suite of Charles II. This style of engraving will be described in the place where its application to caricature is mentioned. The introduction of mezzotint engraving, and the very beautiful portraits by Sir Peter Lely, are almost the only facts worth remembering in art during this licentious reign. The Merry Monarch having passed away, bigotry succeeded licentiousness ; for his brother James, no better in morals than his departed majesty, added to a loose life gloomy fanaticism. The open en- couragement of Romish priests by James roused the fears of Protestants, and renewed hostility broke out between the two parties. The Commons had in Charles II. 's reign brought into their House a Bill of Exclusion, which, after more than one warm debate, 6o AN ESSAY ON the House of Lords rejected; therefore, at Charles's death, James became King. To promote the passing of the above Bill, the first illustration on Group 14 was executed. It would seem that the entire work is done with the graver. It is clever in its invention, and free in its drawing. It is entitled " The Prospect of a Popish Successor ! " London is represented as on fire; the principal figure, James Duke of York, is selected on this occasion for the example of caricature. The ancient idea of double-headed Janus is here adopted and carried through the entire figure. The Duke of York is divided vertically — half devil, half papist. He wears the costume of the time, varied only by a wooden sword. He has "put his foot" into the English Crown. With vipers for hair, his face is represented blowing a fiery blast through a trumpet decked with a rosary and a cross. The other half is our old friend the Satyr of antiquity, dished up as Satan, finished off with horns, tail, sting, proper to the arch- enemy. Holding a flaming torch, and bent upon incendiarism, he spreads conflagration and destruction all around him, which is indicated by skulls and thigh bones. Near the incendiary torch is this inscription, "This is a hopeful successor, is it not?" A legend on the print is this: "Thus I'll govern Hereticks, or Godfrey 'urn "—an allusion to the murder of Sir Edmondsbury Godfrey at Primrose Hill in 1677, a f° u l deed, attributed as a matter of course to the Roman Catholic party. This murder gave rise to intense public excitement at the time. The body of Sir Edmondsbury Godfrey was carried through the streets in procession, preceded by seventy clergymen, and attended by a vast multitude. Caricatures on this event issued from the press. The Pope was represented in bed, the ghosts of the devil, Godfrey, and other victims of Papal persecution, haunting him. The engraver is Faithorne, date 1680. Its title, " Hellish Plot ! " Another of similar title has twelve compartments relating to Pickering's Plot. The scoundrel, Titus Oates, of meal-tub notoriety, is repre- sented favourably in a line engraving done by T. Dudley, 1680. Another engraving satirically represents Madame Cellier sitting under the pillory and defending her face with a board from the missiles. This woman was fined ^1,000 and pilloried, on account of her participation in the Meal -tub plot, 1679. These circumstances being fresh in the public mind, were referred to whenever political changes were indicated. The inscription on the print: "Thus I'll govern Hereticks, or Godfrey GROUP 14. (Page 61. fi catholic family. (P r - Sacheverell. ETCHINC. CARICATURES ON the STUARTS. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 6i 'em," had, therefore, great point at that particular time. Meta- phorically, this prophecy of the caricaturist was fulfilled, for the unfortunate James, prompted by the Jesuit Petre, and the infamous Jeffreys, spread far and wide the most rancorous feelings and incendiary measures during the three years of his disastrous reign. The legal scoundrel, Jeffreys, was a disgrace to any reign, and most worthily was he gibbeted by the pencil of the caricaturist. Disgraced, despised, and abhorred by all, this hell-born villain fled from an infuriated mob ; but in his flight he received such injuries, that he died in prison of his wounds. He is represented in the disguise of a sailor, fleeing from a mob. Satan is quite ready to give him a warm reception, and claims him as an especial favourite. On June 10, 1688, was born the celebrated and unfortunate Prince of Wales, James Francis Edward, styled the "old Pre- tender." He died at Rome, December 30, 1765. The central head on Group 14, tells a volume of events which happened only four months after the birth of this ill-fated prince. It is a portrait of James II., selected from a large and elaborate print entitled, " England's memorial of its wonderful deliverance from French oppression, performed through the Almighty's infinite goodness and mercy, by His Highness William Henry of Nassau, the High and Mighty Prince of Orange." In this celebrated cari- cature, a large orange-tree, decorated with shields bearing coats- of-arms, drops an orange on the head of the King and his infamous chancellor, Jeffreys. The orange knocks the crown off the head of James, and this, by a felicitous piece of invention, cuts a long story short. A speech supposed to be uttered by James runs thus: " I may thank France for this ! " The King, Queen, the Pretender, and Father Petre, are in another part leaving England. The eye of Heaven watches the Protestant Church and keeps it from falling. The King of France is shown trampling on his sub- jects, and threatening them with sword and pistol. The date of this print is 1688. It is no doubt the work of a Dutch artist in the pay of his Dutch Majesty, preparing to be William III. Louis XIV., an extravagant, overrated, bad king, drove from France all men who could not patiently abide his tyranny. Indeed, Holland then, like England now, was the great place of refuge from persecution on account of politics or of religion. At that time, Holland possessed some of the most celebrated painters and most skilful engravers in the world of art. Of these, Romayn de Hooghe was the most eminent amongst caricaturists. William of Nassau found him, as well as other artists, ample employ- 62 AN ESSAY ON ment in caricaturing Louis XIV. and James II. The " Grand Monarque," however much he despised the Dutch and their arms, was far more sensitive to the bitter satire from the pencils of the Dutch caricaturists. November 5, 1688, is the great day of Protestantism in England. After preparing his way by secret diplomacy and open caricatures, the Prince of Orange landed on that day at Torbay, and soon after ascended the throne of England as William III. " My friends, I come for your goods," said his highness. " Ay, and for our chattels too," growled a Papist. Good, however, did result to England from the advent of the Dutch- man — albeit, his taste at Hampton Court was not for high art, as we can see to this day. One of William's great objects was to cast doubts upon the legitimacy of the Prince of Wales ; and to this end numerous caricatures were as usual imported from Holland, in which the relations between Mary of Modena, James's queen, and the Jesuit Father Petre, are handled with more malignity than truth. Another of his highness's points was to add to abuse of the Romish practices of James, the accusation of the King of England living under the protection of Louis XIV. In 1685, a caricature was published in which the Queen, Mary of Modena, is represented in a confessional, to whose confidences a wolf in the garb of a priest is listening with great pleasure and satisfaction ; no doubt intended for Father Petre. The inscription is in English ; but the work of the print is evidently Dutch. Another design on Group 14 gives a portrait of Queen Mary of Modena rocking the Prince of Wales in a cradle; her confessor, Father Petre, is whispering confidentially into her ear. On the table lies the symbolic orange. The print is named " A Catholic Family." The illustration on the right of Group 14 is taken from a caricature called " Perkin's Triumph; or, the Jacobite's Hope." The design is freely etched, and is by Mosley. Perkin, the Pretender, is seated in a chariot drawn by two tigers (typical of cruelty), two dragons (symbolic of arbitrary power). Imper- sonations of liberty, toleration, moderation, and property, are trampled on by a crowd of Papists led by the Pope, his Cardinals, and Inquisitors, carrying a gibbet, a pillory, and the usual em- blems of torture. The date of this caricature is 1709. According to the emissaries' reports and the Protestant belief, the paternity of the Prince of Wales was assigned to Father Petre, and therefore, by William's partisans, the young prince was called " Peterkin," the son of Petre, and by abbreviation " Perkin." According to another statement, the prince was really the son ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 6 3 of a miller, and surreptitiously introduced into the palace to be passed off as the child of King James II. This latter bit of scandal caricaturists have introduced by a toy windmill for the young prince to play with. One of De Hooghe's caricatures consists of a lobster carrying Father Petre, who holds the young Prince of Wales in his arms; on the top of the child's head is a windmill. On the lobster's tail is a Papal crown, with relics and indulgences. The lobster has seized with one claw the English Prayer-book, and with the other the law-book of England. In this print, described in Dutch, the little prince is called " the new-born Anti-Christ." Under William and Mary, England enjoyed comparative quiet. The exiled James died at St. Germains, on September 16, 1701. FOLIO VIII. ENGLISH CARICATURE TO THE DATE OF W. HOGARTH. William and Mary proclaimed King and Queen. — Battle of the Boyne ; Caiicatures on it. — Dutch taste introduced in England. — Death of Mary, 1694. — Hemskirk. — Francis le Piper. — Death of William III., 1704. — Accession of Anne. — Dr. Sacheverell. — Sciiblerus Club. — History of John Bull. — Death of Anne. — George I., 1 714. — Robert Harley. — South Sea Swindle.— Hogarth's Caricature. — Bubble Cards. — Picture by E. M. Ward, R.A.— Picart's Caricature. — Bad Mezzotints. HE landing of the Prince of Orange at Torbay on November 5, 1688, took place amid the usual hand- kissing, grasping of legs, hanging on at the coat tails, and tugging affectionately at the cloak skirts, which form the ordinary demonstrations of affectionate fi|p loyalty towards any new object who can bid tolerably high ^ for it. The worthy son-in-law of James II. having seen his ex-majesty safe out of Whitehall, disguised in humble attire, took up his residence at St. James's Palace, where he received the com- pliments of the nobility, and the Lord Mayor of London — with the usual fulsome addresses, ever producible when a royal nose is to be seen. James, though a fanatic, was brave, and could act with dignity, as in the instance when sitting to Sir Godfrey Kneller for his portrait, news was brought of the landing of William. The painter, confounded at the information, laid down his brush, upon which the King quietly said, " Go on, Kneller, and finish your work, I wish not to disappoint my friend Pepys." Princess Mary arrived February 12, 1689, in London, and at the banqueting-house sat in state with her Dutch husband. Here the members of the two Houses read the celebrated " Bill of Rights," and made a solemn tender of the crown to their Highnesses. This pretty toy the Prince received in his most AN ESSAY ON ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. gracious manner, and the next day William and Mar}'- were pro- claimed King and Queen jointly, but the active partner in the firm was to be William III. How the crown business was managed does not appear ; whether William wore it on Mondays, and Mary on Tuesdays, whether it was divided and made into two crownlets or no, is not on this record. William's activity and pugnacious disposition soon had play, for in 1690, he, at the head of his army, had to fight his father-in-law in Ireland. James was entirely defeated in an action known in history and President West's picture as the Battle of the Boyne. This event gave rise to a vulgar caricature, published in France in 1690. The Jacobite party spread false reports at this time, one of which was that William had been killed. In this caricature the corpse of William is followed by Queen Mary and the supporters of their cause; on the left-hand side of the picture is a view of Satan's fiery palace, the occupier getting ready to give his Dutch Majesty a warm reception. King William having succeeded in his objects — that of ascend- ing the throne of England and vilifying the exiled Stuarts — there appears to have been a lull in the production of caricatures. Hating most cordially the French King, William's great aim was to wage war with him, consequently the satiric vein was now directed to France, and Romayn de Hooghe produced caricatures on Louis le Grand in a very bitter spirit, so much so, as to raise the indignation of civilised Europe against " Le Grand Monarque." In one of these Louis XIV is seated, costumed like Harlequin, on a wild Ass. James II. in the Rabelaisian character of Panurge, keeps him company. The two royal friends have their heads joined together under one Jesuit's cap. " Panurge seconde par Arlequin Deodaat a la croisade dTrlande," 1689, * s tne title of a satiric print representing James II. and his adherents marching to the place of embarkation. Father Petre heads the procession, carrying Peterkin, the Pretender, in his arms. William had little taste for anything but war, and that only in a small way. His Majesty's taste for art maybe seen at Hampton Court, in the closets furnished with Dutch pictures, Dutch monsters, and hideously-formed Dutch china. His worth has been thus summed up by a witty satirist : "William III. did not add much to the reputation of British royalty in former days, for then sovereigns were so bad that they would never have been allowed to pass in times like these, when we examine the weight and quality of the metal. He was by no means popular when alive, and bad characters do not, like old port, improve by keeping." It was K 66 AN FSSA Y ON at this time that the term "Jacobite" was first applied to any supporter or friend of James II. and his family. Queen Mary died in 1694, so that William now reigned sole monarch of England. The blessings of a standing army in and a national debt on England, are due to the government of this King, and his hostility to Louis XIV. In 1701, James II. died in exile at St. Germains, leaving his son, a boy of thirteen years of age, to carry on the Stuart interest ; he was generally known in England as the Pretender. William, though no great patron of art, attracted to England many of his countrymen, who practised art in its numerous branches, caricature or satiric works included. Egbert Hemskirk was eminent for painting drolls, wakes, quakers' meetings, and comic subjects in imitation of the style of Brouwer. Francis le Piper was an eccentric gentleman, who travelled much on foot, sketching on the way. He produced numerous works at taverns, where he spent nearly all his time, giving away to his boon companions whatever he did. He etched many comic designs, generally on oval silver-plates, with a firm hand and free execution. Of these engraved plates his friends made lids for their tobacco-boxes. The death of William III. by a fall from his horse Sorrel, by which he broke his collar-bone, called to the throne of England the Princess Anne, wife to Prince George of Denmark, of "Est il possible!" reputation. William's death took place on March 8, 1704. His horse stepping on a mole-hill became frightened and threw the King. The injury he received was not of itself dangerous, but from his emaciated state, fever set in, and death ensued soon after. The Jacobite toast now became " The little gentleman in black velvet !" alluding to the mole. The reign of Anne produced numerous great satirists and men of letters. Caricatures were at that time not abundant, however ; some were imported from Holland, others copied in England, De Hooghe still being pre-eminent. Queen Anne is represented in caricatures holding down the Gallic cock, that is France, with one hand, while with the other she clips its wings. The example selected from this date is on Group 14, and is a caricature of the notorious Dr. Sacheverell ; it was engraved in 1 7 10. This renegade Whig parson attacked the Lord Treasurer Godolphin, under the assumed name of Volpone, in a sermon preached before the Lord Mayor at St. Paul's in 1709. For this he was prosecuted and became a political martyr — a lucky thing for him, as his sermon sold to the number of 40,000, and he was ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. subsequently appointed to the good living of St. Andrew's, Holborn. The caricature is not badly executed, it being in fact a portrait ; the satire is introduced by the devil and a popish priest influencing the Doctor while composing his sermon. This is only one of seventeen caricatures on this political parson. The illustration at the upper part of Group 14, dated 1709, and called " Perkin's (Peterkin's) Triumph," has been already described. The subject of it was, unfortunately for the Stuarts, applicable to the events of many ensuing years. Chronologically, this is the right place for it, as well as for the caricature on Dr. Sacheverell, for both belong to the reign of Queen Anne. One of the caricatures by the eminent Romayn de Hooghe was copied in London, and commemorated the eclipse of the sun, May 12, 1706. Queen Anne's jolly countenance in the moon eclipses that of the sun (Louis XIV.) on terra firma. The Queen, surrounded by her counsellors and generals, is seated on her throne, and, firmly holding down the Gallic cock, deprives this pugnacious bird of its plumage. In 17 10 an English engraver named Bickham published a curious print which soon obtained great popularity. The idea was that of small prints, cards, portions of written letters partly overlying each other. By the aid of the graver and etching- needle he produced an imitation so closely resembling the original group, that it was regarded as something quite surprising. These curiosities may even now be seen in some old farmhouses. 1711 is the date of the same idea applied to political carica- ture. Four knaves in the playing-card suits are placed over a portrait in such a manner as to partly show it. The print is care- fully etched, and the imitation of the original grouping of cards over a print well carried out. Anne's reign was brilliant in military annals and in literature. During her rule, native art progressed considerably, and sub- sequently shed lustre on the fame of England. The satires from William and Mary's reigns to the date of 1733 were innumerable, for not merely was the want supplied by French and Dutch artists, but numerous able native caricaturists were now in full practice. To this period may be referred the gradual abandonment of systematically encouraging foreign artists to the injury of native talent. Caricaturists derived great aid from the contributions of those wits forming the celebrated " Scrib- lerus Club." Its members undertook to write a satire on the abuse of human learning in every branch. The humorous style of Cervantes was to be adopted. Pope wrote the first book of the 63 AN ESSAY ON "Memoirs of Martinus Scriblerus." "Gulliver's Travels" was Swift's contribution, also the "Art of Sinking in Poetry," the " Virgilius Restauratus," and " Stradling versus Stiles." But to the humorous pamphlet entitled " Law is a Bottomless Pit, or the History of John Bull," caricature owes the origin of several most popular impersonations. In this burlesque history, the war is described which broke out on the accession of a branch of the house of Bourbon to the throne of Spain in 1700, and was termi- nated by the peace of Utrecht in 1 7 1 1 . Dr. Arbuthnot, the author, has treated it wittily as a law-suit between England, Holland, and Austria against France and Spain. John Bull re- presents England in this pamphlet, and we all know how his sturdy form has been adopted by caricaturists from that period to the present hour. How many fanciful variations John has passed through, though still remaining the same honest straightforward burly fellow, with a particular liking for beef! Louis Baboon is a pun upon Bourbon, and signifies Louis XIV. ; Holland is called Nick Frog; Charles II. of Spain as Lord Strut; the Duke of Marlborough is called Hocus the lawyer, who ate the oyster and gave each of his clients a shell ; Mrs. Bull is the English Parlia- ment ; John Bull's mother is the Church of England ; Sister Peg, the Scottish Kirk ; Lord Peter is the Pope ; Martin the Lutheran party, Jack the Calvinistic party. Similar to this, in intention, is Swift's celebrated " Tale of a Tub," and Dickens's witty paper in Household Words, upon the disputes at John Bull's fireside, about the High and Low Church question. On the death of Anne, the first George, Elector of Hanover, came to the throne of England, September 28, 17 14, and was at once absorbed by the Whig party. Obstinate, but tolerably sagacious in the management of affairs, he contributed to the happiness of England by maintaining a comparatively serene atmosphere in religion and politics. Possessing but little taste for literature, science, or the fine arts, he gave no encouragement to their professors, but the impetus they had received in Anne's reign carried them on through this dull period. Freedom of the press, however, gave a stimulus to comic art, and especially to caricature, until these productions became almost indispensable to the public enjoyment. Robert Harley, Earl of Oxford, Speaker of the House of Commons, Secretary of State, Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Lord High Treasurer at various times, was the first victim of the caricaturist. A great political intriguer and devoid of principle, he, through Mrs. Masham, gained favour and place under Queen ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 69 Anne. Upon a charge of fraud he was committed to the Tower, but tried and acquitted in 1720. Harley is called " Robert the political juggler," and is represented as a hump-backed, ill-made, bandy-legged fellow. The Tories now revenged themselves on the Whigs, who were basking in the Royal sunshine; so they flooded London and the country with multitudes of caricatures, low libels, and seditious papers, sold at a halfpenny or a penny each. High Church and Dissent were at war with each other, and mixing up politics with religion. The name of the notorious Dr. Sacheverell became a war-cry for the mob. They attacked the houses of Dissenters, and did very serious mischief to their property and to their persons. Rioting of this kind went on for a long time, only thinly covering the real plot, which was for a bold dash by the Pretender and his party to recover the English crown from the Hanoverian King. Horace Walpole assures us that nothing could be more gross than the ribaldry vomited out in lampoons, libels, caricatures, and abuse of all kinds against the Sovereign and the new Court. An event now took place which may be considered as the true basis of the really English school of caricature — the terrific smash- up of the South Sea Scheme in 1720. Shares in this Company paid at first 10, 20, 50 per cent., then 126, after that 325, and at last 1,000 per cent. This tremendous rise was effected by gigantic lies, spread widely, about the inexhaustible wealth in the countries of the South Seas. The public went mad in their anxiety to obtain shares in this wonderful company. The Prince of Wales ; the King's mistresses, Erengard de Schulenberg, Duchess of Kendal, and Charlotte Kilmansegge, Countess of Platen, in Germany, and Darlington, in England ; the Duke of Marl- borough ; Sir Robert Walpole ; Harley Earl of Oxford, and a long list of nobility and gentry made many thousands in this gigantic swindle. Doubts arising respecting the stability of the South Sea Company, a committee was appointed to examine and report upon the Company's accounts, when the books were proved to be full of false entries, blanks, erasures, and numerous altera- tions, while some of the books were missing, either by robbery or destruction. A universal panic ensued, banks stopped payment, and ruin was everywhere. Some of the unfortunate victims fled from the country, others committed suicide, and a hideous state of public credit ensued. To cover up this villainy, the treasurer ran away with the most important book, and sought refuge in Brabant, where he was arrested, but, by the influence of the King's mistresses, he was not given up to the English Government. In 7° AN ESSAV ON this awful state of social ruin, every one being affected by it, a sensational state of feeling ensued, which sought relief in satire. Caricatures by English, French, and Dutch artists abounded. "The Brabant Screen" was a favourite mode of expressing the screening or protecting influence of the King's women in withhold- ing the great robbers from just punishment. Hogarth made his talent useful on this occasion, and etched with great care a caricature on this atrocious swindle. There is much clever invention in this early work by Hogarth, its execution is rather laboured, and in its drawing there is an evident study of the style and works of the famous Callot, the great French caricaturist. Group 15 contains a photographic reproduction of this design. A roundabout set up in the city has wooden horses all well supplied with riders, among whom are a divine, a shoellack, and a peer. An eager crowd keeps the wheel revolving ; a ladder stands ready for fresh adventurers ; at its foot an aged man advises caution to his son who is desirous to mount and try his luck. Satan sets up a golden stall near Guildhall. Fortune is hung up, her body consists of gold. Satan cuts off lumps of the precious metal and flings them to the eager crowd. On the left of the subject a Roman Catholic priest, a Jewish rabbi, and a Methodist parson, play together a game of chance for riches. Honour personified, is tied up to a whipping-post and scourged by a scoundrel, who has a mask and pistol. An ape decorated with an ancient cap and flenrs de lis, indicates the Mississippi Scheme in Paris ; the ape covers himself with the robe of Honour, and exposes him to the lash of villainy. The South Sea Scheme was but an imitation of one pro- pounded in Paris by a Scotch financier named Law, in 17 17-19. The object of this scheme was to monopolize for the French the trade of the River Mississippi, in North America. Law, " The Paper King" as he was named, soon fell into difficulties, and before long his reign closed, the scheme collapsed, and, like the South Sea Bubble, spread ruin far and near. Honour and Honesty, represented by Hogarth in this pictorial satire, are sacrificed to the public greed for gold. Honesty is being broken on the wheel by Self-interest armed with a bludgeon ; at his girdle are a fishing-net, an empty file for receipts, and pick-locks ; an apparently devout clergyman is reading the service for persons at the point of death. Trade starved, has dropped down merely to die. A large building is opened as a raffling-office for husbands with fortunes, and the staircase is crowded with fair applicants. The pedestal of the r- AN ESSAY ON South Sea Bubble, and its collapse, are well depicted by Mr. E. M. Ward, R.A., in his picture of the grand smash of this company. It is painted in the true Hogarthian feeling, and is one of the most interesting pictures in the National Gallery. The history of this disgraceful swindle, the pamphlets, squibs, songs, lampoons, and caricatures published about it, would make a good and interesting volume. Farces were also played to suit the temper of the times ; in fact, the Legislature, Pulpit, Bar, Stage, and society generally were so painfully interested in the collapse of the many schemes of the day, that hardly any other subject was listened to. French, Dutch, and English caricaturists were all hard at work, some inventing, others copying, to supply the demand for caricatures upon these numerous bubble-schemes. In talent, the French were the best. Picart was an engraver of great talent. His large engraving on the public mania for schemes of all kinds, including that of the Mississippi and South Sea, evinces great power of invention, drawing, and engraving. Fortune and Folly are drawn in a triumphal car by a wooden- legged Mississippi governor, a lame-legged governor of the South Sea Scheme, the agents of the companies, having tails like foxes, turn the wheels, each spoke representing a company. Of course Satan is active here, blowing soap-bubbles. Nume- rous well-designed groups are placed conveniently in this large engraving. This was but poorly copied in England by the engraver. It however forms one of a large number of the cari- catures published in 1720. These, with satirical plays and songs, were collected and published in folio, under the title, " The Great Picture of Folly." The avidity for caricatures was so great that, in several instances, old woodcuts were re-published, old plates touched up and altered, with fresh descriptions engraved on them, and issued to the public as recent productions applicable to passing events. Sir Robert Walpole, who profited by the South Sea Scheme, and had opposed it in Parliament, now came with wise measures to gradually alleviate the distress in society caused by the villainy of the South Sea officers, and the people high up in power and influence surrounding the King. FOLIO IX. Decline of " The Legitimate Drama" under Charles II. — Amusement and Excitement afforded by Italian Opera, Masquerades, and Pantomimes. — Gay's Beggars' Opera.— Hogarth's Caricature. — Expected Invasion by the Pretender. — Military Fever. — Camp in Hyde Park. — Death of George I., 1727. — Hogarth's Patriotic Caricatures. — Calais Gate. — England and France. — Accession of George II. — War with France. — Retirement of Sir Robert Walpole. — " March to Finchley." k HE Legitimate Drama," as it is called, suffered great moral and literary debasement under Charles II., from which it had been but slowly rising, when the South-Sea Bubble, and numerous other similar schemes, by unduly raising their shareholders to sudden wealth, and more lddenly reducing them to destitution, unhinged the public mind and public morality ; hence a craving arose for sensa- tional and novel amusements, by those whom fickle Fortune had not left penniless. Italian opera had begun to steal into England, and though in a lame style of libretto and of music, yet found supporters for the mere love of novelty. Added to this gradual innovation of music on the English stage were masquerades, managed by John James Heidegger. These saturnalia had special immoralities which commended them to the votaries of pleasure, and were carried to such a pitch of licentiousness that an attempt was made in Parliament to suppress them. Harlequinades and Newgate dramas added to the general disorder, and it was in this state of society that Hogarth seized his etching-needle and produced several caricatures. Hogarth, in a caricature with but shallow invention and slightly etched, ridiculed Wilkes, Booth, and Cibber, for pandering to the taste for opera, pantomime, and plays, founded upon incidents supplied by the Newgate Calendar. Rich, the manager of the theatre in Lincoln's Inn, produced, in 1723, L 74 AN ESSAY ON " Harlequin Dr. Faustus." The following year was brought out " Harlequin Jack Slieppard." This worthy had just been hanged, so the play proved to be a great success. Horses, wild beasts, dragons, tumblers, wire and rope-dancers, and all kinds of mon- strous theatrical personages and effects, were resorted to by the managers of that day to gratify the vitiated taste of the public. To ridicule the rage for operas, pantomimes, and masque- rades, with their accompanying immoralities, Hogarth etched his plate of "Masquerades and Operas;" Burlington Gate, date 1727. Curious enough, Hogarth, in introducing the well- known gate of Burlington House, inscribed as an " Acfademy of Arts," with Raffaelle and Michael Angelo on the angles, while that pretender to taste, Kent, towers above them, has anticipated that which has actually taken place, for Burlington House is now partly occupied by the Royal Academy ! The fore- ground of the masquerade ticket is occupied by two crowds ; that to the left consists of a motley crowd, led by Satan and Folly to the masquerade and opera ; a soldier on duty indicates royal presence. Heidegger, the ugliest man then known, who conducted these musical entertainments, is welcoming the crowd from the window. A large show-cloth represents the Earl of Peterborough, and two other noblemen, on their knees, beseeching Cuzzoni and Farinelli to accept of eight thousand pounds ! The crowd on the right hand appears more respectable ; they are hurrying in to see the pantomime of " Dr. Faustus." A soldier on duty gives royal sanction to the performance. In the centre, a large barrow, wheeled by a woman, is conveying away a load of rubbish : this is formed of plays by Shakspeare, Ben Jonson, Dryden, Otway, Congreve, and other celebrated authors. The figures are neatly drawn and etched, in imitation of the style of Callot, whose works greatly influenced the comic productions of this date. These plates are lightly-etched works, intended only as a transient hit at the follies of the day; they have not much invention, nor are they examples of Hogarth's best style even of caricature. About 1727, the public taste, or rather the taste of the " upper ten thousand," ran wild upon Italian opera and masquerades, to the discomfiture of the managers of our national theatres, who then, as now, were obliged to resort to pantomime, scenery, dresses, and other spectacular means of keeping their houses open. Hogarth took the part of the " legitimate drama," and ridiculed this Italianised taste for opera and ballet. A dispute arose, in 1728, between two of the Italian idols; consequently opera, for a time, was under a cloud. In this state of exotic ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 75 singing, Gay, the poet, wrote his caricature opera — the well-known "Beggars' Opera." With smart and witty dialogue, aided by Dr. Arne's music, it drew the fashionable world to the theatre in Lincoln's Inn Fields. Its subject, robbery and debauchery; its characters, thieves and loose women, instead of disgusting the nobility and gentry, as might have been expected, proved to be one of the most complete successes ever known in theatrical affairs. This caricature-opera was acted all over the kingdom. The songs and designs of the characters were printed for ladies' fans, and skreens were ornamented with prints of a similar kind. Lavinia Fenton, the first Polly Peachum, became celebrated in songs and prints, and soon after her successful debut became Duchess of Bolton. Such was the rage for this stage caricature, that at last public morality became alarmed, the " Beggars' Opera " was denounced from the pulpit, the press abused it, until the Court at length discountenanced it. This opera, as a caricature upon the ever over-estimated Italian opera, is conceived and carried out by Gay in a spirit truly resembling the satire of Fielding and Ho- garth. The latter, however, finding a perfect mania had taken possession of the public, high and low, for this questionable but pleasing production, caricatured the absurd adulation, and the noble and wealthy supporters of the mock-opera. On Group 16 is a caricature upon the stage caricature of Italian music, and its pretentious professors of both sexes. Hogarth, in this satirical print, has hit the true point between free, etching and line-engraving. The invention is good, the composition also, and the drawing free ; the execution is unre- strained, the shadings light, the whole effect clear and brilliant, with no aid from the graver. As an etching it is greatly superior to that of " The South Sea Bubble." Captain Macheath, the gay superficial highwayman, has the head of an ass. Pretty Polly Peachum figures as a cat, and Mrs. Peachum' s vulgarity is well satirised by a pig's face. Old Peachum has a bull's head ; and the other worthy, Lockit, has the face and head of a calf. Lucy, the other chere amie of the Captain, has the head of a parrot. A gibbet in the scene indicates the tone and character of the piece. The orchestra is composed of great professors of the Jew's harp, the salt-box from Bartholomew fair, the bagpipes, dulcimer, and bladder-and-string. In a compartment to the right, Cuzzoni, the idol of that day, dips her hands into bags of guineas, offered to her on all sides. Under the stage, Apollo is packed away, with his lyre broken. The rest of the print consists of admiring noblemen, amongst a crowd of persons of a lower rank in life. AN ESSAV ON The angel flying, and bearing off " Harmony," is borrowed from one of Rembrandt's etchings. On the stage, the pretty music by Arne, and the bustle of the scene, drown the caustic wit of the dialogue. Its popularity exists to this hour ; for the part of Polly is generally selected by a vocalist of power, and the dashing, gay, thoughtless Macheath, is almost always one of the favourite parts of a tenor singer. Doubtless, the success of the " Beggars' Operas suggested the idea, in subsequent years, of dramatising much of the choice literature found in the Aeugate Calendar. By reference to Hogarth's illustrations of the principles of caricature, in the previous pages, it will be seen that he also had great command over the etching-needle and the process of " biting in, "such as this print proves. The year 1722 was one of alarm, on account of an intended invasion by the Pretender. This prince had left Rome, and the Duke of Ormond had left Spain to join the Pretender in his descent upon England. A military fever took possession of every one, to such an extent that a camp was formed in Hyde Park, and all Papists, or suspected Papists, were ordered away, by royal proclamation, from London. This preparation proved to be needless, as no invasion was attempted. George I. died in 1727, and was succeeded by his son, George II., who trusted to his minister, Sir Robert Walpole, the administration of affairs. An opportunity offering to make war on France, the King gladly availed himself of it, in consequence of which Walpole retired from office in 1742. AtDettingen, George II. showed to advantage, by cheering the British troops on to the attack ; this last appearance of a King of Great Britain on the field of battle, was therefore creditable to royal courage. The Pretender, and the Jacobite cause, with the French alliance, kept England in a ferment at various times, and, by consequence, the anti-Gallic hatred at boiling point. " No Pretender ! No Popery ! No Slavery ! No Arbitrary Power! No Wooden Shoes ! " was the creed of every true Englishman. Hogarth, no lover of George II., was, never- theless, an Englishman back and bone, so he helped, as far as he could, to keep up the hatred and contempt for France by his " Calais Gate," and two freely-etched caricatures on Group 18 and 19. " Calais Gate ; or, The Roast Beef of Old England," Group 17. Hogarth, Hayman, both painters, and Cheere, a sculptor, made ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 11 up a party to pass over from Dover to Calais, and very jolly they were, until Hogarth was arrested as a spy, and taken before the Governor. Hogarth, thinking himself as free to act in France as in England, began to sketch the Old Gate at Calais, and to be rather too independent and satirical in his manner, when he was stopped by a sentinel. The Governor, however, decided that he should quit France immediately, upon which Hogarth was escorted by two guards on board a vessel about to sail to Dover. These two soldiers twisted him round and round on the deck in an insolent manner, and then told him he might go. Hogarth took his revenge by ridiculing the French on every opportunity. In this work, " The Roast Beef of Old England ! " he laughs at the lean figures of the French soldiers, produced by "soup maigre," and he contrasts meat of a "cag-mag" sort, with the magnificent sirloin of British beef, under which the skinny cook is staggering ; a fat friar casts longing eyes on the delicious mass. Hogarth represents himself as being arrested ; the likeness is good, and his arrest is indicated by the hand on his shoulder. In the foreground, a poor half-starved Scotchman, gnawing a head of garlic, indicates the condition of many deluded supporters of the Pretender. The fishwomen, on the left side, are ludicrously comparing the likeness of each other to that of some fish, fresh caught. This incident of Hogarth's arrest has been well painted by W. Frith, R.A. Hogarth disliked even the very mention of his adventure at Calais. " England," Group 18. This is a specimen of the true anti-Gallic feeling, con- sidered at one time to be perfectly natural and proper to be possessed by a genuine Englishman. Hogarth is the first of a long roll of caricaturists who have developed completely this contemptuous dislike of our clever neighbours. A recruiting party is regaling at an inn, bearing the sign of the Duke of Cumberland, who, by a cross-reading, is " roast and boiled every day." The table bears a round of fine English beef and a pot of English beer, also the grand national song of "Rule Britannia." A sailor with one lass, and a soldier with another, make merry over a hideous caricature of the King of France, touched in by a soldier in the Foot Guards. The girl measures the width of British bone and muscle by her apron. The fifer in the fore- ground reclines on his drum, and evidently enjoys the recumbent attitude after a glorious beef dinner ; he plays, for his own delight, 78 AN ESSAY ON " God save great George our King!" To the right, a recruit, just caught, stands on tiptoe in order to rise to the required height, so anxious is he to serve his King and country. In the background active drill is going on. "France," Group 19. The companion subject to "England" is "France," also etched by Hogarth. In a comfortless barn or stable, entitled " Sabot Royal," — famous for that " soup maigre " — hangs a wretched apology for a sirloin of beef, the best that poor France can produce. A shabby lot of knock-kneed scarecrows bearing firelocks, prepare to embark for old England to invade the country, to take "vengeance, and the Bon bier et le bon Beuf de Angleterre." Truly Hogarthian French ! Why should he, William Hogarth, every inch an English- man, bother his brains with the lingo, only used by slaves who wear wooden shoes ? A rather lanky, but elegant officer, while animating his men, with the prospect of good English beef and beer, contents himself for the present by cooking four frogs, which he has spitted on his sword. A monk, fat and sleek, feels with pleasure the edge of an axe made ready to chop off heretic heads; his pleasure also extends to the contemplation of a sledge, wheel, spiked-collar, thumbscrews, gibbet, and cat-o' -nine-tails, nicely prepared for the English. Images are also included ; and these the insular heretics are to be forced to worship. The barren soil of France is being ploughed up by miserable cattle, assisted by women. Soldiers unwilling to embark on this perilous enterprise, are being prodded forward by their officer. This pair of prints is brimful of invention, is well composed, and etched with great freedom. The light and shade in both subjects is distributed with good effect. It was just about this time that Hogarth, standing at the inter- section of the Hampstead Road, by the now-called Euston Road, witnessed the march of the royal troops past that spot, marked by the old Adam and Eve inn on one side, and the old King's Head on the other. His keen eye and ready pencil booked for posterity the confusion attending the rear of the regiment on its march to Finchley. To describe it in detail would take too much space, nor does it quite come into the class of caricature art ; it is, indeed, comic and satiric in the highest degree. A baggage-waggon is lumbering on its way, loaded with women, babies, knapsacks, and camp-kettles, surrounded with drunken, disorderly soldiers, entirely FOLIO X. Hogarth's " Gin Lane." — Criticisms on this Work by Charles Lamb and Charles Dickens.—" Beer Street." — "Enraged Musician." — Street Noises. — Perspective Ignorance. — Line of Beauty. — Paul Sandby, R.A. — " The Caricaturist Caricatured." "Gin Lane," Group 20. -^N Hogarth's time drunkenness was, as it still is, the curse of England. In his day, gin-drinking prevailed to a frightful extent; but while deploring this vice amongst the lower orders, it ought not to be forgotten that drunkenness produced by gin, differs not in its moral aspect from that produced by wine, in the higher orders. What made a five-bottle- man more respectable in his drunken- fit, than a poor half-starved wretch, who could only afford a dram or two ? But gin is vulgar, while champagne is genteel ! So the wine-bibbing legislators set to work as usual "to meddle and muddle" the question. It must be admitted that a dreadfully depraved state of drunkenness had been reached, when the keeper of a gin-shop in Southwark had the impudence to paint this horrible announcement on his shop-front — Drunk for I penny. Dead-drunk for 2 pence. Clean straw for nothing ! Sir Joseph Jekyll proposed an enactment by which a heavy duty should be laid on gin, and that it should only be sold in small quantities. This bill passed with little opposition ; upon this the caricaturists set to work, and a lively time they had of it. The downfall of Madam Gin was celebrated in verse and exhibited in numerous caricatures. Mock funerals of " Madame Geneva," I ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. who died September 29, 1736, took place. A figure dressed up as Madame Geneva was lying in state surrounded by mourners in liquor shops : which were put into mourning ; of course the mourners drank themselves out of their senses, got together in mobs, committed excesses, and finished by being sent to prison. Like all such Acts of Parliament, it effected little, if any good, for the Act was evaded in every possible manner. Gin was sold under all kinds of false names, some very coarse, some witty ; in this way, gin was to be procured from bottles in the public streets, and drunkenness prevailed in spite of law and informers. In 1743, this Act was repealed. Amongst the flood of caricatures of all degrees of merit, Hogarth's "Gin Lane," published in 1736, floated to the top, and to this hour retains its immense reputation as an exponent of the horrible consequences of drunkenness. The subject "Gin Lane," possesses all the inventive power displayed so emi- nently by Hogarth. A horrible phantom of a man starved and all but dead, can scarcely sell the maddening liquor to others. Above him, one of "the fair sex," intoxicated, drops her child from her drunken clutch down a cellar. The wretched child itself is a victim to drink and disease, and may perhaps be only maimed by its fall. Its death, indeed, would be the most merciful visitation for the unhappy child of such a depraved and disgusting mother. Above this drunken wretch, a father and mother hasten to pawn their cooking utensils and the father's saw, while their starving children and a dog, gnaw a bone. A fearful row is going on at Killman's (note the name !) liquor-shop, where are two charity girls drinking gin, and a horrible woman forcing gin into a baby's mouth. In a fit of drunken insanity, a man has spitted his own child, and is dancing about frantically, with a pair of bellows on his head. The houses are tumbling down, disclosing a wretched barber, who in a drunken fit has hanged himself. In the middle of the street, a beadle, quite in a business-like style, places the corpse of a gin-poisoned woman in a coffin ; her orphan child is weeping. Mourners in the distance indicate that a funeral has just passed by. Charles Lamb, the celebrated " Elia," has written an elaborate criticism on this appalling scene. Of this extraordinary produc- tion, Lamb says, truly : — " Some persons confuse the ideas of a painter of common or vulgar subjects with the being a vulgar artist. The quantity of thought which Hogarth crowds into every picture would alone unvulgarise any subject he might choose. Let us take the lowest of his subjects, ' Gin Lane.' Here is plenty of poverty and low stuff to disgust, on a superficial view. M 82 AN ESSAF ON I have seen many turn away from it, not being able to bear it. The same persons would have perhaps looked with great com- placency upon Poussin's celebrated picture of the ' Plague at Athens.' Disease and death, and bewildering terror, in Athenian garments, are endurable, and come, as the delicate critics express it, ' within the limits of pleasurable sensation.' But the scenes of their own St. Giles's, delineated by their own countryman, are too shocking to think of ! " To transcribe all that has been written upon this great work of Hogarth is not within the object of this book ; yet the opinion of an eminent moralist and judge of character, Charles Dickens, may be given in regard to the subject itself, and its treatment : — " The scene in Gin Lane is that just cleared away for the extension of Oxford Street — an awfully foul-smelling and horrible mass of thieves' dens, existing from Hogarth's own time. It is a remark- able trait of Hogarth's picture, that while it exhibits drunkenness in the most appalling forms, it also forces on attention a most wretched, indecent, abject condition of life that might be put as a frontispiece to our sanitary report of a hundred years later date. But beyond the ' reeling houses ' mentioned by Charles Lamb, as sympathising in the general drunkenness, we have indication quite as powerful of what leads to it, among the neglected classes. The best of the wretches are pawning the commonest necessaries and tools of their trades ; and the worst are homeless vagrants, who give us no clue to their having been otherwise in bygone days. All are living, and dying, miserably ! Nobody is interfering for prevention or for cure in the generation going out before us, or the generation coming in. The beadle is the only sober man in the composition, except the pawnbroker, and he is mightily indif- ferent to the orphan child crying beside its parent's coffin. The little charity girls are not so well taught or looked after but they can take to dram-drinking already ! The church, indeed, is very prominent and handsome, but quite passive in the picture ; it coldly surveys these things in progress under shadow of its tower." Charles Dickens was an intense admirer of Hogarth's great productions, and at Gad's Hill had the staircase hung with a fine set of impressions from his engravings. Many were the hours the great novelist passed in contemplating the works of the great English satirical painter. "Beer Street," Group 21. In this subject Hogarth exhibits the beneficial effects of ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 85 a draught of good, sound, wholesome English beer, when it could be obtained. Had Hogarth lived to the present time, and seen the analysis of his vaunted liquor, compounded of water, coriander seed, cocculus indicus, tobacco, salt, sulphate of iron, gentian, and other ingredients supplied by the beer-doctor to adulterate malt liquor, it is doubtful whether he would have commended this beverage by the aid of his powerful pencil. No doubt a draught of good, honest, home-brewed beer is far prefer- able to the burning stuff, miscalled gin. Such was Hogarth's opinion, and consequently he expresses it by the present composi- tion in praise of beer. A jolly butcher laughs heartily at the strong feat of a blacksmith, who, invigorated by beer, lifts bodily a lean French postillion, jack-boots, portmanteau, and all ! A sign-painter, said to be Liotard, a French artist, in a happy state of beer, touches in the sign of the "Barley Mow." Two pretty fishwomen read a ballad in praise of beer. At the right side of the composition, a ticket porter rests his load, and refreshes himself with a draught of honest beer. He has a heavy load to carry. Hogarth here slily satirises the authors of certain heavy books, consigned to Mr. Past' em, the trunk-maker. These are " Lauder on Milton ; " " Hill on Royal Societies ; " " Turnbull on Ancient Painting," tracts on politics, and modern tragedies. As beer has driven away gin, the pawnbroker can carry on no longer; so his shop is shut up, and his house and sign are falling down. The distant composition shows indubitable marks of industry, the result of beer-drinking. Houses are finished, church bells are ringing, everywhere are signs of well-doing. Beer has always been upheld by our legislators as an antagonist of gin. "The Enraged Musician," Group 22. This subject is introduced not merely on account of the humour displayed by Hogarth, but because it illustrates the application of complete line engraving, preceded by etching, to that style of art which in common " parlance" is classed as caricature. Hogarth not only etched with the greatest freedom, but he also handled the graver with great skill. Who cannot, on looking at this composition, sympathise with the persecution the late Mr. Babbage underwent in his mathematical studies, by the organ-grinding of Italian beggars, and by horrible German bands. Charles Dickens, with all his animal spirits, in vain tried to write while suffering the infliction of street-music. To such an extent was this the case, that when engaged upon one of his admirable AN ESSAF ON novels he was forced to abandon his sea-side residence, as Broad- stairs was invaded by German bands, organ-grinders, and Nigger singers, keeping up an incessant din from morning till night. Sweeps' cries, and other street noises, such as " Dust ho !" and the bell ; horn blowers with newspapers, and some other noisy occu- pations, have, thanks to Parliament, been abolished, others have been partially silenced ; still street noises are curses to all the occupiers of houses, who have mental work to do. Here is poor Festin, a musician, interrupted in the moment of inspiration by an aggregate of noises enough to madden any student. The only redeeming point is that presented by the pretty milkmaid. This head has been re-engraved several times from the interesting figure here introduced. One might hope that so pretty a face might have a sweet voice, and " milk below" be a charming sound, even to a Babbage, especially if a voice and countenance so artless announced pure unadulterated milk ! Well may poor Festin stop his ears, and look daggers at the hautboy player ! The wretched ballad singer and her brat, howl immediately in Festin' s ears, while the boy's trumpet, the girl's rattle, and the dog's yell, all help the accursed din. The old-young gentleman, in bag-wig and wooden sword, beats a drum to his own intense delight. Hogarth, in selecting a knife-grinder setting a butcher's cleaver, has given an example of one of the most discordant, nerve-punish- ing noises in existence, not excepting the horrid screech of the railway whistle. Of course a dog — dogs seem highly susceptible of noises — tries with all his might to yelp down these extraordinary sounds. The pavior, with his rammer, and emphatic " Ha !" as he delivers the blow; the dustman, with " Dust ho !" and a bell accompaniment ; the fish-hawker, itinerant cattle-doctor and farrier, with his horn, contribute to the bewildering noise. Cats "cussing and swearing" on the roof of a house, from whence a sweep issues to bawl "Sweep!" and rattle the chimney-pot, all help the general confusion of sounds. The flag flying on the church tower indicates a peal being rung. The inscription "Long, Pewterer," suggests a delightful and prolonged addition to the general and deafening din. By the playbill, the "Beggars' Opera" appears triumphant; possibly Hogarth intended to hint that the scene before us resembled the orchestral effects of that renowned opera. Ireland, one of Hogarth's biographers, states that this celebrated picture originated in a story told him by Mr. John Festin. As a musician, he was celebrated for playing on the hautboy and German flute. While waiting to give a lesson to a nobleman, he opened the parlour window and sat down on the ¥ ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 8 5 window-seat. Before the rails was a wretched fellow playing on the hautboy. A man with a barrow full of onions offered the piper an onion if he would play him a tune ; that ended, he offered a second for a second tune ; the same for a third, and was going - on. This was too much; so he bawled out — "Zounds! stop here. This fellow is ridiculing my profession ; he is playing on the hautboy for onions !" In this celebrated work Hogarth does not appear as a caricaturist in regard to the faces or figures. Character indeed there is to the fullest extent, no doubt derived from careful sketches and close observation. The hautboy player and the milkmaid are doubtless the result of sittings, so of the boy with the drum. The musician is probably a vivid recollection, if not of Festin himself, of some musician similarly annoyed. The other figures seem to be designed from street sketches. The object of the present work, dealing only with the lighter pro- ductions, that is, with the caricature portion of the great works of William Hogarth, precludes any criticism of his wonderful serial pictures, by which the name of our illustrious countryman is revered in all the cities and towns throughout the world where art is understood. "Frontispiece to Brook Taylor's Perspective," Group 23. One entirely original production by our great satirist is his introduction to Brook Taylor's "Treatise on Perspective." In this " Frontispiece" he has ingeniously contrived to bring together all the vulgar errors committed by persons attempting to draw without a knowledge of the laws of perspective. Here we have a good-natured old gentleman indulging in that sport cynically described by Dr. Johnson " as consisting of a rod, with a worm at one end, and a fool at the other." The angler's figure is very freely drawn, and he stands firmly. His attention is directed towards two ill-drawn trees instead of the fish he has just caught. Placed as he is with regard to the fish, the rod must be an uncommonly long one, as it extends beyond the rival angler many yards away, and actually crosses his tackle. This is an error of perspective depth, great indeed, but not very apparent until it is explained. The old gentleman stands on an impossible pave- ment, for the vanishing lines are here entirely reversed. Tubs are drawn indicating the tops to be visible as well as the bottoms. The boards, the courses of brick, the windows, the tiles on the roof, the roof itself, are all wrong — the vanishing lines tending to various points. The sign has one part of its wooden frame 86 AN ESS AT ON attached to the house in the foreground, while the other is fixed in a house on the opposite side of the street ! The sign — the Half Moon — itself is partly hidden by trees a half-mile distant. The old man on the hill far off, is too large, and too dark. The woman at the window is the right size for the wrong house, and the man's pipe, which he is lighting from the woman's candle, must be at least half a mile long. The trees become larger as they are more distant, exactly the reverse of what would be the fact. The crow on the tree is bigger than any created bird, while the church is totally wrong in perspective. The water runs uphill, and flows into the church. The bridge has one end in the water, and has .a large tree growing out of its masonry. The boat is sailing on to the top of the bridge, while the sportsman in the boat, shooting at the swan, must see quite through the stonework, as well as shoot through it ! The nearest sheep is too small, the farthest as big as an elephant. The waggon and horses are going into the first-floor window. Altogether, this perfectly original design presents us with a mass of absurdity most ingeniously culled from works by artists or amateurs innocent of the common rules of perspective. Under this useful and amusing caricature Hogarth inscribed "Whoever makes a design without the know- ledge of perspective, will be liable to such absurdities as are shown in this Frontispiece." William Hogarth was born December 10, 1697, in the parish of St. Bartholomew the Great, London. After an education of a limited description, he was apprenticed to Elias Gamble, an eminent silversmith, of Cranbourn Street, Long Acre. Here, in engraving coats-of-arms, cyphers, crests, and various devices customary on articles of gold or silver, he acquired a free use of the graver. But the natural genius in Hogarth prompted him to sketch from nature, and to essay original designs ; for the neces- sary study, and in order to draw from the antique and the living model, he became a student at an academy, held by the painter, Sir James Thornhill. Marrying Sir James's daughter, at the age of 32, he fell under her father's displeasure ; but the rapidity with which he rose to eminence, as a great satirical painter, reconciled papa to the marriage. As a portrait painter, he was not suc- cessful, for he could no more flatter his sitters than can photo- graphy; but as a graphic satirist he held a deservedly high position in society, moved in intellectual circles, kept a large house in Leicester Square, a carriage, and servants. After a prosperous career, chequered by occasional want of patronage and jealousies cherished by his brother artists, he retired to ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 87 Chiswick for his failing health, but returned to Leicester Square, where he died on October 26, 1764, aged 67 years. Between Hogarth and cur great novelist, Charles Dickens, there existed a great similarity in style, thought, and in power of description. Dickens had studied deeply the great works of Hogarth, the thought displayed in them, their touches of humour, and their truth of delineation. His talk about Hogarth was delightful. Had Hogarth's genius led him exclusively to litera- ture, he would have written as forcibly as Dickens ; and, on the other hand, had Dickens adopted the pencil, he would have painted like Hogarth. In delicate sentiment, Dickens has touches in his. works distinct from the most tender passages in those of Hogarth ; but it must be remembered that Hogarth lived at a time when refinement was not carried to the extent that it is at present. Hogarth belonged to no formal school of art ; no academy rules made him the artist he was; no man, living or dead, had any share in forming his mind, or in rendering his hand skilful. He was the spontaneous offspring of the graphic spirit of England, and native as the independent feeling cherished by his countrymen. Seeing a way of his own to fame he followed it, scorned all imitation, and, by words and works, ever held up Nature, as an example, and a monitress in art. "The Caricaturist Caricatured!" Group 24. The subjects of this Group are selected from some rare and valuable etchings in the Print Room of the British Museum. They are caricatures by a very clever artist, painter, and etcher, Paul Sandby, R.A., and one or two other artists, contemporary with Hogarth. In the centre is Hogarth's " Crime, surrounded by its punishment." No doubt can exist that Hogarth was a profound thinker, his works prove it. It is possible, nay, probable, that Hogarth may have met with an old folio, dated 1598, by Richard Haydock, entitled " The Artes of Curious Paintinge, Carvinge, Building," &c. This is a translation from the Italian of Lomazzo, and is one of the earliest works on Art in English. Lomazzo was an Italian author in the sixteenth century, and in a treatise on Art he propounded this theory of the Beautiful : " that if a wire be laid upon a cone at its apex, and bent round it until it reached the base, the serpentine line thus produced would, by its varied curves, be one of beautiful proportions." Now, whether Hogarth had read this English translation, or had its purport explained in conver- sation, or whether he had really made for himself this discovery, 88 AN ESSAY ON this is certain, that he first drew the attention of the modern artistic world to it. He painted the well-known portrait of himself and his dog, " Trump." Under his portrait he drew a palette, and upon that a waving- line, inscribing it as the " Line of Beauty and of grace!" Completely mystified by this diagram, his brother artists anxiously inquired the explanation of this puzzle ; but this Hogarth did not vouchsafe, until some years after, when he published his "Analysis of Beauty," in which the puzzle is explained, and the diagram applied in numerous ways. It was then found that the mysterious line was, in fact, an old acquaint- ance of theirs, and, like Monsieur Jourdain, who had spoken prose all his life without knowing it, so English artists had been applying the Line of Beauty without knowing it. Hogarth, according to President West's account, was a strut- ting, consequential little man, not very tender, either with pen or pencil, towards his contemporaries ; and therefore, when his book, " The Analysis of Beauty," appeared, a storm burst upon him. He was assailed in verse, prose, and caricature ; his satirists spared neither his works, his person, nor his fireside. Among his caricaturists is Paul Sandby, an original member of the Royal Academy. Sandby drew landscape beautifully, etched skilfully, and produced many engravings in aqua-tint, a style imitative of monochromic drawings in Indian ink or sepia. The illustrations on Group 24 consist of caricatures of Hogarth by Paul Sandby, R.A., and other contemporary artists. In the centre is a cone, with the line round it ; on the palette is the wire or line repre- sented — the cause of all this disturbance. The upper caricature was published in 1762. A donkey's body is fitted with a portrait of Hogarth ; no name is given. Some ill-natured verses accom- pany this design. One of the best is by Paul Sandby, R.A. It is entitled, " The Author run mad ! " and is beautifully drawn and etched. In this, poor Hogarth figures as a Bedlamite ; for cap he has a large inkstand decorated with peacock's feathers — vanity ! His palette hangs round his neck ; the blanket from his truckle-bed is pinned over his shoulders like a mantle; in one hand he holds the terrible " Line of Beauty," with his other hand he draws more lines of beauty on the bare walls of his cell. Straw is bound round one leg, to the other is a chain attached by a ring, the chain being labelled " the precise line;" a magic circle is drawn on the floor. Under this is another etching by Paul Sandby. It is named " The Burlesquer Burlesqued. 2nd edition. Done for ye French!" It has a second title, " The Pug Dog," alluding to GROUP 24. (Page 87. THE CARICATURIST CARICATURED. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 89 Hogarth's favourite pug, " Trump." Here Hogarth figures as Trump, in regard to lower extremities ; the upper part is the painter himself. A cupid whispers in Hogarth's ear while he paints. On the folio is a triangle, with the line of beauty inscribed within. The lowermost subject is entitled " An Unfortunate Analyst." Hogarth is holding his " Analysis of Beauty," sup- ported on his famous " Line of Beauty and of grace." Copies of his book are being consigned to the caves of Dulness and Oblivion. "The Combat" (1762) represents Hogarth's excessive vanity by mounting him on a gigantic peacock, lance in hand, ready to do battle with his brethren of the brush. Hogarth had had a bitter quarrel with his old friend, the celebrated John Wilkes ; so he and Churchill, a disreputable parson, set to work to abuse Hogarth. Lord Bute, a Scotch peer, one of the most unpopular men of his time, and odious to the people from his influence at Court, had appointed Hogarth " Sergeant Painter to the King," an office which carried a good pension. Hogarth here figures as a white- washer, seated on a plank, washing an immense Jack Boot, the popular name and symbol applied to Lord Bute. The design is well etched, and is called, by a pun, "The Butyfier" — a good hit, as it ridicules the peer and the painter both at once. Hogarth's whitewash is in a tub, labelled "Pension;" while whitewashing the jack-boot, he clumsily splashes it over Pitt and Temple, who are standing beneath the plank on which Hogarth is sitting. Besides these specimens introduced, numerous other carica- tures were published against Hogarth. In one, the ghost of Lomazzo accuses him of theft, in appropriating his " Theory of the Beautiful," and terrifies him by holding up " The Line of Beauty and of grace." Another represents Hogarth as Eros- tratus setting fire to the Temple of Art. Hogarth in another design is caricatured as a mountebank, curing hump-backed beggars, by making them conform their backs to his Line of Beauty. In fact, a volume might be filled with caricatures, pamphlets, prose attacks, songs, and ill-natured, some of them disgusting, doggerel verses, in which he is made to paint deformed figures from his models, while his name was twisted into "Hog," "Pug," "Ass," and all possible forms of petty annoyance. Hogarth, however, had to some extent exposed himself to these attacks, by excessive vanity in his art. His success as a great moral-painter, and the interest taken in his works by the sound thinkers of his day, puffed him up, and induced him to N 90 AN ESSAY ON ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. speak in terms of contempt of all his brother artists, some of whom he had caricatured. As for his contemporaries, his pictures satirised many men in various professions, and though his satire might be viewed as applied to classes, yet he introduced so many portraits of living persons that he naturally provoked a host of enemies. An unsuccessful portrait -painter, wanting the grandeur and dignity necessary to succeed in poetic or in historical painting, he became vulnerable, in this way, to the shafts of ridicule directed at him, by those artists who had succeeded where he had failed. Then, his sturdy independence of character, and self-reliant principles, became somewhat doubtful when he accepted a pension from Lord Bute ; added to which was the unfortunate discovery of the work by Lomazzo, wherein, it was contended, Hogarth had found a theory which he tried to pass off as one originating with himself. Nevertheless, " The Analysis of Beauty" is a valuable work, and Hogarth himself, in spite of his failings, was an artist whose original pictures do honour to Art and to England. Of all artists' works in this country, no others have received so much honour in foreign schools and from foreign art critics as the great serial pictures by William Hogarth. They still remain the strong point by which the English school of painters is estimated abroad. GROUP 25. (Page 91 G RAVE LOT? FOLIO XI. Etchings of Dr. Meagre or St. Anclie. — "Tartuffe's Banquet." — Gravelot.— First Caricature on Bribery. — Sir Robert Walpole and George II. — Walpole's Indifference to Ridicule. — King George and the Lion. — Caricatures of G. F. Handel, of Cuzzoni and Farinelli. — John Wilkes, Churchill, Dr. Johnson, Smollett, Lord Chatham, Pope. — Lords Sandwich and Melcombe. — Lord Chatham, his Death. — J. S. Copley's Picture, "Prelude to the Death of the Earl of Chatham." Y^jjH^HE present Group, 25, presents us with a remarkably K^m^> well -executed etching of Doctor St. Andre. It is with- yf^lli| out ^e artist's name, but from the free style of draw- *K^^^tl m g is most probably by Gravelot, a designer and Map) engraver of eminence. A thin figure, a thin face, and p^f long legs, procured for him the nickname of Doctor Meagre and Merry Andrew. A gross imposition had been practised on the medical profession, and unfortunately he had lent the weight of his name to it. For this the doctor became the butt of carica- turists and lampooners. This Doctor St. Andre seems to be the same as the lean physician disputing with the fat one, in the death- scene of " The Harlot's Progress." However that may be, there is in this figure a boldness of drawing, of etching, and of personal exaggeration which, with the other example called " Tartuffe's Banquet," date 1736, might well have furnished Gillray with the idea of style in caricature for which he subsequently became so famous. The selection is from that part of the print which represents the two poor half-starved curates ; the other portion of it has the burly, well-fed rector entertaining them with great pomp and condescension. It attacks the pluralists in the English Church, which at that date was sadly abused by grasping men, having influence with church patrons. George I. died on June 11, 1727, and was succeeded by his son, George II., who retained Sir Robert Walpole in the 92 AN ESSAY ON Treasury. A new parliament being elected in 1727, was found to have a large Whig majority returned, upon which the Tories and Patriots, overflowing with political virtue, vented their rage in wholesale accusations of bribery and corruption. The principal figure, and the ingenious invention of costume for it, is here selected from an etching called " Ready Money the Prevailing Candidate," a caricature of the time. The virtuous elector has pockets in the back of his coat, so contrived that he cannot behold the agent who would corrupt him. He exclaims aloud " No bribery ! " adding, in an undertone, " but pockets are free ! " An equally virtuous agent puts money into these back pockets, and says, " Sell not your country!" This caricature would appear to be the first satirical hit at the abominable corruption then pre- valent at elections for members of parliament. After more than a hundred years, this abuse is attempted to be remedied by the repeatedly fought question of "vote by ballot," which became law on August 18, 1872. Sir Robert Walpole possessed great power ; he was more than respected by the king, even beloved by him. His Majesty and Queen Caroline were entirely guided by Walpole' s advice. An influence so great as this was sure to raise a host of enemies. Lampoons, songs, political squibs, and caricatures of Walpole and his acts, issued daily from the press. "Bob the Juggler," "Sir Blue String," "Sir Robert Brass," " Sir Robert Lynn," " Robin and Bob," are amongst the names bestowed upon this favoured minister. The caricature on Group 25 at the lower part, uses the classical monstrosity known as Janus. It is named " Touch Me Not, or Bob's Defiance." There is but one brain between the King and his portly minister ; the expression of his Majesty is mild and humble, while that ot Walpole is haughty and defiant. The date of the print is 1742 ; it is also anonymous. Under this design is a small etching of the execution of a traitor on Tower Hill. The large subject on Group 25 records "the fall upstairs" of Walpole. Walpole, finding his majorities gradually decrease in the House of Commons, was aware that his power was departing, and in 1742, defeated by a majority of one, he tendered his resignation to the King. Ihe King was so overcome by the event as to shed tears. Soon after Walpole was created Earl of Orford. The Champion newspaper of February 16, 1742, thus records the event: — " Sir Robert his merit, or interest to shew, Laid down the red ribbon, to take up the blue , By two strings already, the Knight hath been ty'd, But when twisted at Tyburn the third will decide." ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 93 The childish game of see-saw furnishes the subject of a freely- etched caricature, called "Bob, the Political Balance Master." Justice sits at the lower end of the plank, trying in vain to weigh down the portly and heavy form of the newly-made peer, loaded with his treasure, and decorated with the coronet. Afraid of his position, he, with terror in his looks, appeals to Satan, "Oh! help thy faithful servant, Bob," who sternly answers, " This is thy due!" and holds out to him an axe. This much-abused minister deserves our grateful thanks for the manly bearing he exhibited throughout a long administration, opposed by the brilliant talents of Bolingbroke, Chesterfield, Swift, and Pope, all of whom kept up a tremendous fire of wit and sarcasm at him and his measures. Conscious of meaning well to his country, and feeling the necessity of a safety-valve to the irritated state of political parties, he endured bravely the storm of caricatures, songs, and lampoons, with which he was daily pelted. Instead of seizing presses, breaking up types, fining and imprisoning the satirists, like a true John Bull, he said, " Let them scribble and point their satirical artillery against the State ; the discharge is noisy enough, but it is mere brutum fulmen — harmless thunder." This view of a free press has been adopted by the most enlightened ministers since Walpole's time, and when it has occasionally been forgotten, has only brought down upon the government contempt and public indignation. The remaining illustration represents very ingeniously, King George at the Battle of Dettingen. Here the Hanoverian badge, the "white horse," is emblematic of George II., booted and spurred, ready for fighting. The King rode along the lines in the hottest fire to encourage the soldiers. Here he is supposed to be pursuing the defeated French, seated on that noble animal, the British Lion. As the English troops were badly provided, it was stated that England was starved to fatten Hanover. Consequently the British Lion is in an ill temper, with a bit forced into his mouth, and being borne down by the weight of Hanoverian Majesty. The selection made is the most important part of a clever caricature published October 22, 1743, and called "The Hanoverian Confectioner-General." The battle of Dettingen was the last action in which a King of England was in the field. Owing to the peculiar nature of photographic work certain selections have necessarily been made to appear on one sheet, whereby the chronological arrangement is slightly disburbed. Thus, in Group 25, well-known personages are caricatured ; the examples are selected from prints with dates varying from 1727 94 AN ESSAY ON to 1765. The centre illustration is from an elaborately executed caricature, etched by M. Goupy, who was drawing- master to George III. In this the immortal musician, G. F. Handel, is caricatured as a hog playing on the organ. His corpulence was attributed to indulgence in the pleasures of the table, and under the title of " The Charming Brute," he becomes the subject of a graphic satire, published in 1745. As a kind of frame to this caricature are festoons of fish, flesh, fowl, vegetable, and fruit, all arranged with great care, excellently engraved, and grouped evi- dently in recollection of the beautiful wood carvings by Grinling Gibbons. Handel and Bononcini — the latter a musical composer petted by the Whigs— divided the fashionable world at this time, and with no small degree of acrimonious party spirit. Swift's well-known epigram, in this concluding couplet, expresses his idea of the controversy: — "Strange that such difference should be 'Twixt Tweedledum and Tweedletfo?." This giant in music, George Frederic Handel, a native of Halle, in Saxony, was born February 24, 1684. In 17 10, Handel came to London, and was soon patronised by Queen Anne. The royal favour extended through her successors, the two Georges, until his death, on Good Friday, April 13, 1759. Caricature at this time was much indulged in by amateurs, some of them being of the gentler sex. Of these satirical sketches, one example is given, an etching by Goupy, after a caricature by the Countess of Burlington. The eternal legitimate drama was at that period (1726) in a terribly depressed state, similar to its condition in the present year (1873). Tragedy and comedy were neglected by the public, whose taste had been vitiated by Italian opera, pantomimes, harlequinades, masquerades, tumblers, rope-dancers, and wild beast performances. Faustina, Cuzzoni, and Farinelli, the then favourite Italian opera singers, amassed large sums of English money, and returned home to build palaces. The airs these Italian singers indulged in, surpassed all belief, and their graceless impertinences knew no bounds. Lady Bur- lington sketched the dumpy impertinent Cuzzoni, in contrast to the immensely tall and awkward Farinelli, accompanied by the face of the ugliest man of that time, Count Heidegger. Of this design the heads are selected as examples of amateur carica- ture, date 1727. On the left of this design is Hogarth's celebrated etching of John Wilkes, the notorious demagogue, and thorn-in-the-side of King George III. Wilkes, in the year 1763, GROUP 26. (Page 93. JOHN WILKES, BY HOGARTH. ; FARINELLI, CU2Z0NI, HEIDEGGER, BY LADY BURLINGTON. CHURCHILL AS A BEAR, DR JOHNSON, DR. SMOLLETT, ALEXANDER POPE, BY HOGARTH LORD CHATHAM, LORD MELCOMBE, LORD SANDWICH, G. F. HANDEL, BY GOUPY. BY THE HON. G. TOWNSHEND. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. and No. 45 of the North Briton, an abusive periodical, in con- junction with the satiric writer Churchill, published some severe strictures on the King's speech at the close of the Parliament, and also violently attacked the Earl of Bute. The Secretary of State issued his warrant, upon which Wilkes's papers were seized and sealed up, and Wilkes himself committed to the Tower of London. In this publication Hogarth was also attacked, so when Wilkes was brought from the Tower to the Court of Common Pleas at Westminster Hall, Hogarth sketched his face, and with a few magic touches bequeathed to posterity the squinting sensualist and "friend of an ill-fashion" to Liberty. It is said, that, re- membering their former friendship, Hogarth threw this sketch into the fire, but that his wife snatched it from the flames. The quarrel thus established between Wilkes and Hogarth was embittered by the Rev. Charles Churchill, who, in his " Epistle to William Hogarth," savagely attacked the painter. Hogarth's anger being again roused, he took up an old cast-aside engraved portrait of himself and his favourite dog Trump, "and patched it up as a portrait of Master Churchill in the character of a bear," wearing torn clerical bands round his neck, hugging a pot of beer with one paw, and a huge club in the other, the knots on it being inscribed "lie 1st," "lie 2nd," "lie 3rd" and so on. This quarrel only terminated with the death of Hogarth, at which Churchill was base enough to show pleasure, and to boast, that, by the bitterness of his satire, he had killed him. The clerical-looking personage, with a weathercock on his shovel-hat, a huge pen in his hand, and a large volume inscribed ^300 per annum under his arm, is a caricature of our ponderous friend, Dr. Johnson. The Doctor's antipathy to Scotland and Scotchmen is well known, yet Lord Bute, the much-abused minister of the day, to his honour, recommended George III. to grant a pension of ^"300 per annum to the literary Colossus. The weather- cock indicates a supposed change of opinion on the part of the Doctor, but it is well known, that, throughout his life, he possessed great independence of character. Dr. Johnson was greatly disliked by the political writers of the time, on the popular side ; was accused of time-serving and of depreciating talent in other authors, and consequently became a mark for ill-natured satire, and caricature. One of these, entitled " Old Wisdom Blinking at the Stars," gives the Doctor's face to the body of an owl, perched upon " Johnson's Lives of the Poets," and " Johnson's Dictionary," while he views contemptuously the stars represented by Milton, Pope, and other poets. These caricatures are tolerably well 96 AN ESSAY ON etched, and the invention, as far as it goes, sufficient for the end proposed. In 1762, Lord Bute, in his endeavours to encourage literature and art, made some unfortunate selections from the men of the time, as recipients of the Royal favour ; his encouragement seemed only to place prominently before the public two classes of personages especially odious, Scotchmen and Jacobites. Hogarth and Dr. Johnson we have seen were, in fact, pensioners upon the Crown, and suffered accordingly. Smollett, himself a Scotchman, and an advocate of his countrymen, was furiously attacked. A caricature, dated 1762, named "The Mountebank," represents Lord Bute as a quack doctor, loaded with bags of guineas, ready for distribution among Scotchmen. Behind the curtain is caricatured the Princess Dowager of Wales, with whom scandal had been busy. Her popular name was the "Witch," and she wears the orthodox steeple-crowned hat, supposed to be proper for such an odious personage. Dr. Smollett, the novelist, and defender of Bute's policy, is here figured as the Jack Pudding, or mountebank to quack Dr. Bute ; he is supposed to be delivering a comic speech to the crowd, the burden of which is the efficacy of English gold to give relief to the Scotchman's "itch" for money. The figure of Smollett is conceived in the true spirit of fun, is freely drawn, and is by far the best part of the caricature. It not only gives an example of the style of caricature prevalent at this date, but records the graphic attack upon one of our great novelists, whose works are second only to those of Henry Fielding. Pope, in 1728, deservedly became the subject of numerous acrimonious attacks by pen and pencil. His mean personal appearance, his vanity, and his ill -temper, were points seized by clever satirists and caricaturists ; added to which, in his satirical poem, "The Dunciad," he engaged upon a wholesale attack on his contemporaries in art and literature, rendering this act of aggression still more offensive, by the great merit of the poem, and the pungency of the satire. The uproar amongst men of letters at that time is now inconceivable. Ambrose Phillips, one of his victims, hung up a rod at Button's Coffee-house, to be ready for inflicting punishment on Pope, when he should first make his appearance there. Poor Pope lay for many years on a bed of nettles, prepared for him by "The Dunciad." Curll, a book- seller, who had been victimised in "The Dunciad," revenged himself by publishing repeated attacks on Pope, ridiculing his personal appearance, his private character, and sneering at his works. In a pamphlet called " Pope Alexander's Supremacy and Infallibility Examined," a caricature is introduced named ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 9 7 "Poet Pug;" in this Pope's face is placed, on the body of a monkey, date 1728. Henceforth, Pope went by the nick-name of "Poet Pug." Leaning on a pile of books, Pope holds in his right paw an arrow, which is supposed to be envenomed, thus alluding to the deadly point of his satire, while by the monkey, Pope's mean person is ridiculed, as well as his power and dis- position to work mischief. " Meager and wan, and steeple crown'd, His visage long, and shoulders round. His crippled corpse, two spindle pegs Support ; instead of human legs. His shrivell'd skin of dusky grain, A cricket's voice, and monkey's brain." These lines are quoted from Curll's book "The Martiniad." Curll published within a short time " The Popiad," "The Cur- liad," "The Female Dunciad." Besides these, many epigrams were written and published, all pointed at Pope. Hogarth, un- able to resist the stimulus to ridicule Pope's habit of universal bespattering, has introduced him in his caricature called " Bur- lington Gate," whitewashing and bespattering anybody that came in his way. Pope persisted to the last in raising enemies by his violent temper. In 1742 he published an additional book of "The Dunciad." In 1744 his health declined; and on May 30 he died of asthma and decay of nature. Amongst the amateur caricaturists of that day was the Hon. George Townshend, one of whose caricatures is here given. Mr. Fox, unable to form a Cabinet in 1757, tried to persuade Lord Winchelsea to accept the Admiralty, and Lord Sandwich, with Lord Melcombe, to take office. This plan, however, failed, and Mr. Pitt was again in office. This caricature was called " The Recruiting Sergeant." Lord Sandwich, being thin, is called "a lean follower." Jemmy Twitcher was his nickname, and as he was fond of playing at cricket, he is represented with his bat on his shoulder, and his light shoes hanging from it. Lord Melcombe, or Bubb Dod- dington, alias "Silly Bubb," follows Jemmy Twitcher, but being extraordinarily corpulent and overcome with fatigue, cries out, " I can't follow this lean fellow much longer, that's flat!" The etching is tame and poor, but the contrast between the panting fat man and the light-going leader is well contrived. Horace Walpole, writing of this caricature, in a letter to Sir Horace Mann, thus expresses his opinion of it : — " Pamphlets, cards, and prints swarm again. George Townshend has published one of o 9 S AN ESSAY ON the latter, which is so admirable in its kind that I cannot help sending it to you. His genius for likenesses in caricaturing is astonishing. Your friends Doddington and Lord Sandwich are like; the former made me laugh till I cried !" The remaining caricature is a pictorial joke upon the first William Pitt, created Earl of Chatham, whose popularity was such that he was named "the friend of the people." It is called "A Peep into the Garden at Hayes," the residence of this great statesman. The figure is a thorough caricature, all the personal peculiarities of Lord Chatham being exaggerated. The etching itself is spirited and freely drawn. Increasing years brought infirmities with them ; besides which he was a martyr to the gout ; so much so that he was frequently unable to attend in Parliament. He was accused of shamming fits of this sad com- plaint whenever puzzling or difficult political subjects were under the consideration of Parliament. King George III., on Pitt's retirement, offered him a pension of ^3,000 per annum, which he accepted; in addition, his wife was created Baroness of Chatham. Out of office, Pitt became the victim of newspapers, pamphlets, songs, and caricatures. One of the latter represents him, in a desponding state, holding his political programme, inscribed "it will not do." The title is "The Distressed Statesman." In 1765 Pitt's popularity revived, and the Duke of Cumberland, the King's uncle, was sent to Hayes to persuade him to join a new ministry : but he refused to do so. A caricature represents the duke on horseback about to visit a village inn, the sign of " The Blown Bladder." In front of the inn is a table, on which a gigantic gouty foot appears, while a pair of crutches stands against the wall. The title of the print is " The Courier." The re-opening of Parliament in 1766 cured Pitt of the gout. He again appeared in his place, speaking of political affairs with his usual power and eloquence. After a few months, Pitt patched up a Cabinet of curious and varied politicians, reserving to himself the sinecure place of Lord Privy Seal, besides " falling up-stairs," as Lord Chesterfield termed it, into the Upper House, as Viscount Pitt and Earl of Chatham. In 1778, he denounced the conduct of the American War; but his strength failing, he dropped sense- less into the arms of friends beside him. He was carried home to Hayes, in Kent, where he died on May 11, aged 70 years. The scene of Lord Chatham's sudden seizure is the subject of a large and finely-executed picture, by S. Copley, R.A., now in ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 99 the National Gallery, called " Prelude to the Death of the Earl of Chatham." The painter of this fine picture was himself the father of a dis- tinguished son, the Lord Chancellor Lyndhurst. Hayes, in Kent, celebrated as the residence of the Earl of Chatham, was also the birthplace of another William Pitt, one of England's greatest statesmen. He was the second son of Lord Chatham, and born on May 28, 1759. Caricatures on the political events of the period, possessing more or less point, swarmed from the press. As works of art, many were etched with considerable freedom. Social subjects were frequently designed, some of them grossly improper in sentiment, and as devoid of art-talent as of wit. French fashion and French morality had been imported, with other continental usages, by the young men of family, who went on the "grand tour" of Europe, and came home frivolous and demoralised, indulging in riot and debauchery. Swords being commonly worn at this time, drunken brawls were frequent, and out came the sword always to shed blood, too frequently leading to murder. Associations were formed simply for indulgence in riot and debauchery, such as the " Hell-fire Club," and the notorious brotherhood at Medmenham, of which Lord Le Despencer, Lord Sandwich, John Wilkes, and Thomas Potter, M.P., were leading members. The caricaturists of this period were John Collett, S. H. Grimm, Bickham, Captain Minshull, Captain Topham, W. Bamfylde, Esq. In the meantime one of our most original caricaturists was pre- paring to enter the field of fun. Boitard, Ravenet, Grignion, Gravelot, French artists, etched many plates with great talent. As at the present time (1874) the press teems with comic publications, illustrated by clever designers and wood engravers, so in 1774, magazines and similar periodicals were freely issued, but devoid of similar talent. Political magazines supplied inflam- mable materials to the public mind, and coarse caricatures aided the excitement. These caricatures varied in talent, some of them being contemptible as works of art, others were freely drawn and etched. Assumed names were attached to those productions, such as "Stuart," "Murray," " Yanky," " Hyder," Sam Sharp- eye," "Bitehard," " O'Garth," "Hog Ass," " Hogart," &c. Added to political caricatures were many on social events, pub- lished with the magazines, in some of which scandalous articles abounded, aided by wretched attempts at comic design. These I 00 ENGLISH GRAPHIC SA TIRE. efforts were merely pointed at passing events, and too frequently overstepped the limits of propriety ; nor did the pretended wit palliate the licentious feeling or desire to give pain to individuals in private life. As regards the art displayed in the latter, neither the history of caricature, nor examples of it, would lose much, were these scandalous records consigned to the flames. . FOLIO. XII. CARICATURE FROM HOGARTH TO GILLRAY. W. H. Bunbury, Esq., an amateur: his rich style of caricature. — Commences drawing and etching at Westminster School.— Caricatures the "Dons" at Cambridge.— Travels in Italy and Germany. — His drawings in Pencil, or black or red chalk, engraved in dot and aquatint. — These methods of Engraving described. — Ridicules awkwardness in Riding or Dancing. — Death in 1811. — Portrait of Bunbury. — " Geoffrey Gambado." — Illustrations of his style of Caricature. — James Sayer, born at Great Yarmouth. — Pitt's own Caricaturists.— Feeble Draughtsman. — Etchings very weak. — Pitt gives him four appointments under Government. — Hostility to Fox and his Party. — Attacks the "Coalition."— Examples of his style of Carica- ture. — French Revolution. — "The Night Mare." — Reproduction of one of his Etchings. — Death of Sayer, 181 1. W. H. Bunbury, Esq. ^^^H^NE of the funniest and most original of English cari- f'% ',■':<§! caturists is Bunbury. Mis works are remarkable for If^PIll!^ their humour, and that of a rich, unctuous kind. William Henry Bunbury, born 1750, was the youngest Wwr son of Sir William Bunbury, of Mildenhall in Suffolk. Sent to Westminster school, he appears to have preferred drawing caricatures on his exercise books to studying the classics. He even went so far in art as to etch " a boy riding on a pig." Matriculating at Catherine Hall, Cambridge, he still adhered to his love of pictorial fun, and improved much in his power and style of drawing. Most of his drawings were made in chalk, either black or red. At college he amassed a great store of points of humour, and sketched dons and undergraduates. Many of these drawings were subsequently retouched, engraved and published. A visit to the Continent furnished him with droll figures and costumes, especially those in Italy and Germany. Riding and dancing were two accomplishments which afforded him some of his broadest points of humour. He absolutely 102 AN ESSAV ON revelled In fun at the expense of cockneys, awkward horsemen, and clumsy dancers. Ludicrous points in society also engaged his taste for ridicule. He delighted in exaggeration of face and figure, so essential to caricature. Ponderous old gentlemen in wigs and buckles ; queer old maids, stiff and prim ; beaux in ridiculous costume ; coats cut in the oddest fashion, the wearers in the most awkward attitudes conceivable, and queer wigs dis- torted by the village barber, were all put down by Bunbury's pencil with an effect irresistibly ludicrous. Mr. Bunbury died in May, 1 8 1 1 , aged 61, at Keswick in Cumberland. His works are numerous, that is, engravings after his cari- catures are numerous, for his powers of etching, though begun early in life, never were matured, his etchings being scratchy, thin, and devoid of effect. In the hands of Ryland, Gillray, Rowlandson, Watson, and Bartolozzi, Bunbury's comic subjects or caricatures became very popular, selling in large numbers. Being engraved from Bun- bury's chalk drawings, the stipple or dot style was employed, as it imitated chalk in the closest way. The point of a round-bellied graver is used to make the dots shallow or deep, as may be re- quired. By a succession of these dots, aided also by " the biting in" used in etching, very fine effects can be obtained. In other cases the etching was assisted by " aquatint," applied to the half tints and shades. Common resin is dissolved in alcohol ; according to the quantity of resin and the quantity of alcohol so the ground is fine or coarse, resembling a tint of water colour : hence aquatint. The theory is, that particles of resin, fine or coarse, resist the action of the acid ; thus the metal is bitten into minute holes, near or far apart. To lay the ground the plate should be polished, the dissolved resin be poured on it and allowed to drain off, the evaporation of the spirit leaves a thin coating of resin, leaving in it countless minute cracks, into which the acid runs and "bites." The acid is applied as described in etching, page 45. Light tints require the acid to be poured off very soon ; darker tints require it to remain longer, and so on till the effect required is produced. Bunbury's talent for humour was highly appreciated in the aristocratic circles of which he himself was a member. Sir Joshua Reynolds was one of his warmest admirers, speaking highly of his talent in caricature. Bunbury was not a political caricaturist, so his works have no malignity or party venom in them. His satirical shafts are aimed at social customs ; no personality is introduced, nor are they offensive to any one in respect to their religious or GROUP 27. W. H. BUN BURY, ESQ. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. moral tendency. There is in them much originality and good- humoured ridicule, almost, in some instances, of a didactic nature. One remarkable set of designs is called " The Propagation of a Lie." It consists of a series of single figures, each one receiving in turn "the lie," which has been set going by the first figure. The figures are but slightly sketched, yet the character and feeling of each as " the lie" is passed, are admirably marked. On Group 27 is a portrait of Bunbury, from a drawing by Sir T. Lawrence, engraved by Ryder. The specimens of horsemen are from his celebrated drawing of the riding-house, and exhibit the firmly-seated horseman, con- trasted with the cockney tailor, who has been cajoled into trusting his valuable carcass on a vicious brute, which is certain to throw him ! Three subjects are introduced from Bunbury' s illustrations to "Tristram Shandy," in the time when Sterne's eccentric book had a popularity like that of Dickens's " Pickwick." One re- presents Uncle Toby and Corporal Trim ; the other Obadiah on the coach-horse, upsetting Dr. Slop in the mud. The clerical personage is Dr. Johnson enjoying his chop. The woe-begone head is that of a loser in a race ; he exclaims " Cleaned out, egad ! " and very expressive is the face produced by three or four touches. These are characteristic of Bunbury' s style, and are the models upon which Woodward, Rowlandson, and other caricaturists formed their style. The horseman on the right of Group 27 is, with his steed, accomplishing in an easy manner the descent of a hill on a frosty day. The title is " How to travel on two legs in a frost." This droll incident is from a series, at one time famous as " Geoffrey Gambado's Horsemanship." Here we have a timid and bad rider, sticking anyhow on a brute of a horse, which, determining not to walk, sticks out his forefeet and slides on his haunches down the frosty declivity. Of Bunbury' s extravagant yet highly comic design is an ex- ample called "Chloe," from a design of the courtship of Strephon and Chloe. The examples here are in imitation of various modes of exe- cution adopted by engravers after Bunbury' s designs, in pen and ink, chalk, or blacklead pencil. Bunbury also drew illustrations to Shakespeare's comedies, but they are not amongst his happiest productions. The collected works of this aristocratic caricaturist form a large folio volume, a copy of which is in the Print Room of the io4 AN ESSAF ON British Museum. The last work upon which poor Gillray was engaged was a plate from Bunbury's drawing of " A Barber's Shop." The interval between Hogarth and Gillray was occupied by Bunbury, Sayer, Darley, Gravelot, Ravenet, Grignion, Vander- gucht, and other etchers and engravers more or less eminent. Of these Sayer, as a political caricaturist, is by far the best known. J. Sayer. James Sayer was a native of Great Yarmouth, where his father was a skipper, or by a stretch of courtesy, captain of a ship. James received a tolerably good education, and was articled to a solicitor, but competent means, a taste for sketching, and a talent for writing political squibs, enabled him to take up caricature. Sayer had no regular training as an artist, consequently his drawing is uncertain, and feeble, but a considerable amount of elaboration in the execution of his etchings appears to have been accepted in lieu of an average degree of power in design. Invention he had, of a lumbering, heavy kind, but vigour of imagi- nation at that time was but slightly appreciated by the upper classes, and not at all by the public. Sayer, nevertheless, obtained a considerable reputation, especially as he became William Pitt's own caricaturist. The Rockingham administration, 1782, was his first butt, about the same time that Pitt, then a young man, was aspiring to power. Lord Shelburne, " Malagrida," became premier, with Pitt as Chancellor of the Exchequer, while Fox and Burke had to retire. From this time neither Burke nor Fox, the latter especially, were free from Sayer' s satirical hits. The " Coalition " ministry, under Lord North and Fox, came in for as much virulence of attack as Sayer, prompted by Pitt's party, could bring to bear upon it. Group 28 gives examples of Sayer' s practice, and the ridicule cast upon the "Coalition." The India Bill by Burke, Fox, and Lord North is the subject of the large illustration. Fox acknow- ledged that Sayer's caricature of "Carlo Khan's triumphal entry into Leadenhall Street," was mainly instrumental in demolishing his India Bill. The invention of this subject is tolerably clever, but the figures are ill-drawn. An elephant with a head of Lord North, or " Sir Oliver Blubber," instead of his natural one, is supporting Fox dressed like an Indian nabob. Edmund Burke, GROUP 28. (Page 104. J. SAYER. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. '05 also in Oriental costume, blows the trumpet, and leads the beast to the door of the India House. As it was thought to invest Fox with an undue share of power, the India Bill was rejected. Beneath this, dated 1794, is a satirical record of the separation of the Prince of Wales from the Whig party. " Citizen Bardolph refused admittance at Prince Hal's," is its title. Sheridan, one of the principals of that party and hitherto boon companion of the Prince of Wales, is supposed to go to Carlton House to make his customary call, but to his dismay he finds a hoarding erected in front of the door. A gigantic porter informs Sheridan that there is " no admittance," as all have become loyal in that house! The joke of the play-bills " Henry IV." "The Manager in Distress," "Venice Preserved, or a Plot Discovered," played at Drury Lane and Covent Garden, not only twits Sherry as to his managerial capacity, but hints at the Royal reformation. The invention though simple is effective, and the figures being in attitudes easy to draw, give a favourable impression of Sayer's style. The two pairs of " unmentionables," 1784, having the heads of Lord North and Fox, is a hit at the coalition ministry, and the idea borrowed from the "Nobody" in Group 12, the "Mask" is also a caricature on the "coalition" ministry; in this Fox's black hair and swarthy complexion contrast with Lord North's powder, and fat white face ; date 1783. On Fox moving an adjournment of the consideration of the Mutiny Act, it was resolved by the house " that the heads of the Mutiny Act be brought in and suffered to lie on the table." Sayer caught at the suggestion, and drew two heads just cut off, and lying on the table. The heads were of course those of Lord North and Fox. On the destruction of the "Coalition" Pitt became First Lord of the Treasury and Chancellor of the Exchequer. One of Sayer's works was called " Outlines of the Opposition," pictorial parodies on well-known works of art. Fox in the attitude of the celebrated antique statue, " The Fighting Gladiator," aims a blow at Royalty, indicated by the Royal coat-of-arms. Fox's notorious pecuniary difficulties were sometimes met by gifts of money from his supporters ; he is therefore represented standing on a subscription book, and close by is a money-box ; title " Good grounds of Opposition." On the right of the Group is a caricature by Sayer, very fairly drawn. Here we find in full action, the strong anti-Gallic feeling possessed by all io6 AN ESSAY ON English graphic satirists. This is the principal figure in a cari- cature called "England and France, or Loyalty against Levelling," date 1792. A "sans culottes," half-starved, triumphantly bestrides the decapitated body of a French lady of rank, and bears aloft on a pike her bleeding head — a sanguinary fact in this terrible phase of French history and of frequent occurrence in those lamentable times ! A special interest attaches to the upper subject on this Group, as it is a true portrait of the great minister, William Pitt, replying to his political opponent, Fox, who seems to be receiving a par- liamentary castigation from the youthful premier. The date is 1785, and doubtless is a pictorial record of scenes then frequent in the House of Commons. Pitt is addressing one of his cold, cutting sarcasms to the " Coalition " ministers. Fox tries to con- ceal his emotion, while Lord North buries his head in a news- paper. No doubt, from Sayer being patronised by Pitt, the cari- caturist was frequently in the House and witnessed such passages of arms between those two great statesmen. The print is entitled " Cicero in Catilinam." The heads are engraved in the dot style, and probably by a practised dot engraver. This style of engrav- ing applied to caricature is described in the account ot W. H. Bunbury and his works, page 102. Sayer' s works are numerous, and have been collected and bound up in a folio volume, now in the Print Room of the British Museum. Another of Sayer' s political caricatures is here reproduced by the aid of photography, and in this way the student can judge of his talents of invention and execution. It is entitled " The Night Mare," published May 1, 1799, b y T. Whittle, Peterboro' Court, Fleet Street, for the Anti- Jacobin Review. J. Chapman, aq : fe. Amongst the shadows are J. S. 1799. This is one of the cari- catures furnished to that clever but short-lived publication, Group 29. The great statesman, orator, and gambler, full of admiration of French revolutionary doings, lies stretched on a humble bedstead, which by his bulk and contortions, has broken down under him. Liberty, according to French ideas, is repre- sented as a demoniacal, tricoloured, cockaded "sans culottes," bestriding an unruly beast, the " night mare," lying heavily on Fox's chest. The idea seems to have been suggested by an extraordinary picture from the pencil of Henry Fuseli, a Royal Academician. This picture created a sensation in art-society. It was called " The Night Mare," and represented a diabolical ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. animal lying heavily on the bosom of a young girl, who has supped too freely on solids and novels. The flag-staff of liberty is so placed, in the caricature, on Fox's chest as to be productive of the greatest discomfort. An imp, personifying the military aggres- sion of the French, as well as gout, is racking savagely the thumb and finger-joints of the statesman's hand. His head, decorated with the cap of liberty and its tri-coloured cockade, betokens in the face hard breathing and hard drinking. A diabolical little wretch, with dragon's wings and a girdle of daggers, has lifted the sheet from off the bed. In front are the capacious habiliments of the bulky orator, who has evidently been studying a book of the time, " Godwin's Political Justice." On the floor lie a work "On Ancient Republics," a paper by Wakefield, a part of the Morning Post, and one of a set of dice. The print is an imitation of a chalk drawing, of course by James Sayer, and doubtless etched by him, but from the name of Chapman on it, it would seem that " the biting in " and general finish were by a thoroughly practised engraver. The management of the acid, as before mentioned, is one of difficulty, and is frequently confided by designers to the experienced hands of a line engraver. This caricature bears the evidence of a reaction in his art. At first Gillray was influenced by the style and success of Sayer. Afterwards Gillray' s great powers of invention and freedom of drawing being proverbial, then Sayer' s style was influenced by that of Gillray. James Sayer died in 1806, shortly after Pitt, his great friend and patron. FOLIO XIII. George Darley, caricatuiist of fashions. — Rich Comic Vein. — Avoids Political Subjects. — Specimens of his Style. — Monstrous Head-dresses. — Mrs. Cosway. — Mrs. Robinson "The Perdita." — Gambling. — Fribbles.— Beaux and Macaronis. — Their Monstrosities. — The Maca- roni Mania. — Foote's Stage Caricatures. — An opening for a Caricaturist of Pitt and his Party. — James Gillray enters the Field of Caricature. cature, George Darley. ROUP 30 is remarkable, as it presents a record of ex- travagant and absurd fashions in use by both sexes, between 1773 and 1780. They are examples, selected from caricatures principally by G. Darley. Darley had a decided talent for caricature ; his designs were conceived in the true comic vein. Like Bunbury, he avoided the troublous field of political cari- and devoted his talents to satirizing the inconceivable heights of folly reached in his day, by persons wishing to be con- sidered fashionable. Darley' s drawing was free, and he was quite at his ease with the etching needle. A light effect seems to have been his desire, consequently the process of " biting in " was not carried so far as in the caricatures by his contemporaries, which are firmer and have a deeper effect. His works are very numerous, as in many instances they were of slight and rapid execution, requiring but little time to do. His mission was to cast ridicule upon the monstrosities of fashion, indulged in by both sexes, and truly he spared them not ! The centre subject on Group 30 exhibits the mountains of hair, frills, and feathers, under which our grandmothers or great grand- mothers as the case may be, groaned, in the latter part of the last century. The hair-dressers of the time must have been inventive and of skilful manipulation. The " cabriolet " head-dress, the GROUP 30. (Page 108. MONSTROSITIES OF FASHION, GEO. DARLEY, ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 109 "post-chaises," "chairs and chairmen," "broad-wheeled wag- gons," were all terms in use to denote particular fashions. Artificial flowers and imitative fruit converted a lady's head into a flower or a kitchen garden. Until the present fashion of piling false hair, tow, horse-hair, and imitations of human hair, with little hats, feathers, flowers, and lace on the head, our hair- dressers had become a degenerated race compared with the grand conceptions of a "coiffeur" of the last century. To construct a head-dress towering far above the dear creature's own skull, must have been a great work of art, requiring patience on both sides, and no small amount of money for the wire, wool, curls well powdered and pomatumed, lace, feathers, flowers, and the "professor's" fee for the work! Ladies of limited means could not afford to have their " heads," as it was called, made up every week, or even " opened " to " freshen up ! " So that fre- quently, especially in summer-time, an uncomfortable amount of vitality existed in them. This necessitated the invention of an ingenious little instru- ment called a " scratch-back." It consisted of a miniature carving in ivory of a hand, the ends of the fingers being sharp; this was fastened to a long slender handle, and thus the irritated back or shoulders could be conveniently scratched ! Curiosity dealers and old families preserve this confirmation of our great grand- mothers' irritated skins, under the dominion of an absurd, uncom- fortable, not to say "disgusting" fashion. The centre illustration not only satirises the then prevailing fashion, but a habit of gambling, which formed a lamentable feature of the times, leading its victims to ruin, to fighting of duels, and to suicide ! The fair ones, intent upon cards, venture upon a " leetle " cheating, the accused lady in a fit of virtuous indignation, hurls a candlestick at her accuser, and in this way settles the question. The etching is cleverly done ; its date is 1778, and its title " Settling the Odd Trick ! " The artist, Darley, lived in the Strand, and announced that " any sketch brought to him that was fair game should have due honour shown it." In this way, doubtless, he was much assisted in his invention by numerous amateur caricaturists. A rival caricaturist and publisher named Austin quarrelled with Darley, on which they abused each other and afforded the town some little sport. As amateur caricaturists, Captains Minshull and Topham ac- quired reputation. Grignion, a well-known engraver, with the above amateurs I 10 AN ESSAY ON and artists, attacked that contemptible class of nondescripts who assumed the name of " Macaronis." The lady with the enormous side-curls and extensive head-dress and cap, is said to represent the too-famous Mrs. Robinson, an actress known as " Perdita," and associated with the early history of the Prince of Wales, afterwards George IV. The "calash" was rather a clever invention, and had some idea of utility connected with it. It is said to have originated with the Duchess of Bedford in 1765. The enormous quantity of hair and lace then worn was intended to be protected from the sun or rain by this whalebone hooped hood, strings before and behind enabled the wearer to cover the face or to shield the entire mass of hair. It still exists, but in a degenerated state in the well- known " Ugly." Cosway, the visionary and frivolous miniature painter, had a charming and accomplished wife, whose pretty face is almost hidden under the preposterous cap in which she is represented on Group 30. Satirists and scandal-mongers had about this time ample scope in the hoop-petticoat of the ladies. This was an imitation of the " bombasted " style of dress under Elizabeth and James. Its introduction, in the reign of George II., and during a great part of that of George III., caused this part of ladies' attire, the petti- coat, to assume first a circular form, then an oval, when — fashion by way of variety — added an immense projection on each side of the body. Over this extent of whalebone and canvas, yard after yard of silk or other costly material was stretched, and orna- mented with festoons of lace, ribbons, or artificial flowers, in a manner which has been imitated in the present period, 1869 — 1874. The extravagances of dress on the part of the ladies were out- done by the monstrosities affected by the Macaronis," who made their appearance in 1772 and 1773. Devotees of fashion had passed by the name of " Beaux" in the time of George II., but a rising frivolity on their part procured them the appellation of "Fribbles" under the first portion of George Ill's, reign. Young men having made the "tour" under disreputable tutors or "bear- leaders" as they were then called, on their return to England formed themselves into an association or club. The vices they had im- ported from Italy they determined to add to the original English stock. Preposterous costume, excessive debauchery, and a con- temptible affectation of effeminacy and ignorance appeared to be the sole aim of these precious idiots ; unless, indeed, their object ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 1 1 1 was to show into what depths of frivolity it was possible for men to sink. As Macaroni, served in various ways, was a leading dish at the club table of these exquisites, the members were called " Macaronis." As might be expected, their folly created a great sensation, especially amongst the gentler sex, who immediatedly " maca- ronified " their dress and manner to harmonise with that of the men. Even the clergy were affected by this foolery, and grave divines adopted " macaronism " in the cut of their clothes, and in the style of their sermons and wigs. As it is ever, when the public adopts any fashion, macaronism became a mania. Ever}' thing eatable, or drinkable, or usable was macaronified. Darley published a great number and variety of macaronic caricatures, in which nearly every occupation of life had its maca- ronic representative. Four of these specimens are selected from a collection of macaronic caricatures. The upper example is the " Illiterate Macaroni " learning his A B C at the age of 21. He certainly seems stupid "enough for anything. The gentleman with the bed bolster hanging from his head, and balancing a great stick, is called the " Pantheon Macaroni." On the left appears the " Riding Macaroni." He wears an apology for a hat, but an immensely thick and large tail ; befrilled and beruffled ; this ex- quisite takes snuff from a miniature box. The fourth specimen is difficult to describe as to sex, for the head-dress is evidently imitated from that in fashion for ladies, but on the summit of the monstrous pile of hair is found a miniature cocked hat, thereby indicating the masculine gender. An immense nosegay stuck in his coat, satin shoes, and white rosettes complete the effeminate appearace of this puppy. The press teemed with macaronic songs, poems, and music. Before very long the Macaronis had exhausted their follies, and above all, their credit. The absurdity of the whole thing was now visible, and, macaronism rapidly declining, soon became a thing of the past. Amongst other extravagant fancies was that of wearing enormously large buttons, designs for which Darley caricatured. Some of these buttons were of costly materials, some had pictures on them, but all were of an extravagantly large size. In 1777, Darley published a caricature called " Modern Shields, or the virtue of Steel Buttons ! " Two gentlemen are engaged in a duel. One of them, the figure selected, wears the large polished steel buttons. His adversary presents a pistol, but the gentleman with the buttons directs the reflected sunlight of his mirrors on to I 12 ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. his opponent's face ; dazzled thus, he cannot take aim, and may be supposed to be vanquished by the lightning-flash of steel buttons. This idea, " The Coup de Bouton," is worked up in a variety of ways. The principles of caricature had been explained and practised by Hogarth and Collett. Foote had personally caricatured classes and individuals on the stage of the Haymarket Theatre. Others, of whom Bunbury and Darley were the most prolific in works and richest in fun, had prepared the way for James Sayer, whose vein of humour was not of the richest, nor his invention very varied. Yet about this time, 1779, he as a political caricaturist was the leading man. His prints, feeble as they were, nevertheless were very popular, and a good property. As his mission was to glorify " Billy Pitt" and his doings ; it seemed that an opening remained for a rival caricaturist, by whom the " Opposition," headed by Fox, Sheridan, Burke, and others might raise public esteem. Such being the case, the way was prepared for the Colossus of English political caricature, James Gillray, who soon after stepped into the troublous arena of political strife, and proved himself a very giant at this kind of warfare. FOLIO XIV. CARICATURE FROM GILLRAY TO GEORGE CRUIKSHANK, James Gillray, a true Caricaturist, born 1 757 at Chelsea. — Apprenticed to a Writing Engraver. — Runs away and joins a Company of Strolling Players. — Studies at the Royal Academy and with Bartolozzi.— Draws, Etches, and Engraves with great talent. — Imitates Sayer. — Portrait. — Adopts Caricature as a Profession. — Examples of his Style. — Caricatures Pitt, Dundas, and Lord Thurlow. — " French Liberty and British Slavery." — Reproduction of his Etching for the Anti-Jaabin.— Ridicules Fox and his Supporters.— Sir F. Burdett. — Gout. — The Assessed Taxes — Pitt in the Salt-box.— George III. and " Boney." — Reproduction of his ''Truth."— Enthusiasm when at Work. — Impending Insanity. — Last Original Work on Wdliam Cobbett. — Last Engraving, "The Barber's Shop," after Bunbury, 181 1. — Attack of Insanity.— Care of Miss Humphrey. — Gillray's Death in 1815. — Buried at St. James's Church, Piccadilly. James Gillray. HE etching needle and its accompanying process of cor- rosion or "biting in" of the etched lines, as applied to political caricature or social satire, was never wielded by a more powerful hand than that of James Gillray. The true principles of caricature were first made known in England by our own immortal Hogarth. Yet in practice this great artist did not always carry out his own laws ; probably his veneration for nature was too strong to allow him a latitude of violent and extravagant drawing, such as essentially belongs to caricature. In a farce or a burlesque presented on the stage, however ridiculous may be the incidents and the situations of the actors, or absurd and extravagant their costume, their persons, as regards face and figure, remain generally unaltered. Exaggeration, one of the essentials of caricature, it is true, exists in crowding together a greater number of incidents and in concentrating action to a greater extent than is possible under any ordinary circumstances. Satire may thus result by the ridiculous employment of the 0 AN ESSAY ON figures, but it stops short of its full measure of caricature for want of personal exaggeration. Such a point as this most of the caricaturists before and after the promulgation of Hogarth's principles aimed at reaching. Such a point is also that of many of Hogarth's lighter productions, but full range of exaggeration in incident, costume, expression, and personal delineation implied by the term caricature, was never, in England at least, reached by any artist until it was completely displayed in the works of James Gillray, the greatest of all English caricaturists, and, when the political effect of his works be considered, the greatest cari- caturist of ancient or modern times. The introductory explanation of caricature in this work is based on Gillray' s satires, those of William Hogarth, and of other great artists. Born of humble parents in 1757, Gillray's father being but a maimed out-pensioner of Chelsea Hospital, and sexton to the Moravian burial-ground at Chelsea, James was by him apprenticed to a writing engraver, an employment possibly con- sidered as congenial to artistic aspirations evinced by the boy. A mere uninteresting drudgery like this soon disgusted him, so he ran away and took up with some strolling actors. The adventures, poverty, fun, hardships, makeshifts, dressing and make-up of theatrical character he experienced in this way, enabled him in his career as a caricaturist to seize points of dress, carriage, and ludicrous incident, which render his etched designs so vigorous, original, and remarkable. After a time his feeling for art induced him to return to London and obtain admission as a student in the then infant institution, the Royal Academy, where he became acquainted with various artists, and amongst them with Ryland, a good engraver in the dot or chalk style, who taught him the use of the etching needle and the graver. Gillray was for some time an assistant to the great historical engraver, F. Bartolozzi, in which capacity he matured his hand, and gained knowledge in art generally. When his engagement with Bartolozzi ceased he began to engrave on his own account, from pictures by artists to whom he was known. As an engraver and designer he had much employment from the print publishers ; he also made some progress as a miniature painter. At this time James Sayer was high in public estimation as a political caricaturist, and moreover enjoyed the patronage of William Pitt. For invention, perception of the ludicrous, power of drawing, skill in etching, and dexterity with the graver, Gillray felt himself more than the equal of Sayer, and determined on a trial of strength with the favoured caricaturist. His first efforts in ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. "5 this new direction, were in imitation of Sayer's works, and were signed with the initials J. S. Publishing anonymously for some time, Gillraywas first known by name in 1779, by a caricature called " Paddy on Horseback," the "horse" being a bull ! In 1782 he published a caricature on Admiral Rodney's victory. This is considered as the true com- mencement of Gillray's triumphant career as a political carica- turist. From this time until January, 181 1, a period of about thirty years, Gillray enjoyed deservedly an immense reputation. In this time he produced more than one thousand five hundred caricatures, which fill several volumes. Hardly a library exists without possessing at least one copy of this great satirist's works. In the space permitted in this " Essay on English Graphic Satire," it is quite impossible to do more than to give a general idea of his style of work, invention, and peculiar merits as a caricaturist. Beyond this, the student must consult one of the numerous copies of his works, collected in folio, to which is added a book, with explanatory notes of the subjects and the personages introduced. A folio volume, subse- quently published by Bohn, contains seven hundred selected examples from Gillray's caricatures. In the British Museum Library, and in the Print Room, are copies of this great caricaturist's works. Group 31 has in the centre a portrait of Gillray, etched after a miniature painting by himself. In it a considerable amount of determination is evident, as well as a disposition to cynicism, such as might betoken a man who watched with no small amount of vigilance the actions of public men, and delineated their persons and deeds with an unflinching pencil. In 1788, on the 5th of November, the distressing malady under which the poor King George III. had been suspected to suffer, mani- fested itself in a manner so decided as to call for Parliamentary action. Pitt, whose lofty and cold manner had disgusted the Prince of Wales, foresaw a change of Ministry, and that the Whigs headed by the Prince, would come into office, with his Royal Highness as Regent. Little cordiality could exist between these personages, and this was soon shown by Pitt's endeavours to restrict the Prince's power within the narrowest limits. Numerous caricatures on both sides of the question issued from the press, but by far the best for invention, point, and execution, were Gillray's. One of these was entitled " The Vulture of the Constitution." A vulture having the head of Pitt, and a gorged stomach 1 1 6 AN ESS AT ON labelled " Treasury," is represented as tearing a second feather from the well-known heraldic insignia in the Prince's coronet, one claw has seized the coronet, the other grasps the crown, sceptre, and " Magna Charta." Group 31. Pitt at this time was Chancellor of the Exchequer and First Lord of the Treasury, besides exercising an almost entire control over the opinions of his Royal Master. The subject in its inven- tion is original, and its drawing, etching, and general effect admirable. Queen Charlotte, being by Parliament appointed guardian to the King, the public were much amused at the complimentary language used in regard to her Majesty by Pitt, Dundas, and Lord Thurlow, who suddenly became particularly civil to her. Gillray ridiculed this conduct by a large caricature called " Minions of the Moon ! " a parody on Fuseli's celebrated picture of the "Witches in Macbeth." "The Weird Sisters" here are Pitt, Dundas, at that time Treasurer of the Navy, and the old swearing Chancellor, Lord Thurlow. The bright side of the moon has the profile of Queen Charlotte, on the obscured side is the profile of the King. On the 10th of March, 1789, it was announced in Parliament, that his Majesty had recovered from his illness. The Regency question was consequently laid aside, and universal rejoicing ensued. A grand thanksgiving took place at St. Paul's Cathedral, while in the evening, the illumina- tions were more brilliant than usual. The mental slumber, however, from which the King awoke, made him a witness to one of the most fearful revolutions known in history. France had laboured for years under the yoke of titled oppressors, supported by priestcraft. A school of philosophy arose, concentrating all the discordant elements of society, and like a fearful thundercloud settled on the devoted country. At length the storm burst, sweeping before it, with the fury of a hurricane, every landmark erected by society. This terrific out- burst in France was hailed with joy by many distinguished friends of liberty in England ; but the acts of atrocity committed by the leaders of the French Revolution shocked all well-directed minds. Burke separated from his party, and denounced in Parliament the democratic clubs, and the revolutionary tone of sermons by Dr. Priestley, the celebrated philosopher, Dr. Price, and Dr. Lindsey. This state of things gave rise to one of Gillray' s most whimsical and original caricatures, called " Smelling out a Rat !" Burke's nose and spectacles, to the inventive mind of Gillray, suggested the extraordinary and grotesque combination in this well-known J. GILL RAY. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. "7 pictorial satire. Enveloped in mysterious clouds, the fearfully long nose of Burke supports a huge pair of spectacles and enormous eyes staring at and poking up Dr. Price in his study, who is composing a sermon on the " Benefits of Anarchy and Atheism." Burke with one hand holds aloft the English crown, and in the other the cross surrounded by a halo of light, while between them is his book, " Reflections on the Revolution in France." Gillray's popular mode of placing a question before the public eye no doubt influenced in a great degree the public opinion upon it. Gillray's anti-Gallic feelings found expression in two caricatures on one plate, imitated, as will be remembered, from Hogarth's "England and France." "French Liberty," and "British Slavery," published Dec. 21st, 1792. " Jas. Gillray, del : et fecit : pro bono publico." A half-starved Frenchman, " sans culottes," proud of his cap of liberty and tricoloured cockade, is regaling himself on a head of garlic ; a perfect picture of poverty, he boasts of his liberty — to live on potato- parings ! on the floor lie a fiddle and a sword ; his speech is " Ah ! ah ! vat blessing be de liberte, vive l'Assemblee Nationale, no more tax ! no more slavery ! all free citizens, how ve vill svim in de milk and honey!" As a contrast, we have that ill-used grumbling individual, John Bull, slaving away at a sirloin of roast beef, the table-cloth tied round his neck by way of napkin. His wig reposes upon the arm of his well-stuffed easy-chair. To enable him to support the hard work on which he is engaged, John requires a glass of fine old port, or a draught from a foaming tankard. Abundance is seen everywhere, even the statuette of Britannia is marked "solid gold." Under these heart-breaking circumstances, poor John grumbles thus, "Ah! this confounded Ministry ! they'll ruin us with their taxes. Why, zounds! they're making slaves of us all, and starving us to death." B. R. Haydon, years after, borrowed this idea for his picture of the " Old Tory." Parliament issued a proclamation hoping to improve public morals. Upon this Gillray published a caricature in four divi- sions, viz., Avarice, Drunkenness, Gambling, and Licentiousness. This print was inscribed as "Vices overlooked in the Royal Proclamation," and exhibits them as indulged in by the Royal Family. Our selection is that of Avarice, in which " Old George," and " Old Snuffy," his queen, are hugging their bags of gold, gorged with millions of guineas. On the table lies a book of interest calculations. AN ESSAF ON The lamentable derangement of George III., his peculiarities, and those of Queen Charlotte, the escapades of the Royal Family, and the extravagant and reprehensible conduct of the Prince of Wales, all occupy a considerable part of this great collection of Gillray's works in folio. The sympathisers in this country with the French Revolution and its consequences formed an important party, headed by Burke, Fox, Sheridan, Lords Erskine and Derby, the Dukes of Bedford and Norfolk, and Sir Francis Burdett, all of whom were more or less satirised. Social events also are freely introduced, but the political partisanship of Gillray is obscure, excepting only in the case of the French question — there his anti-Gallic feeling is violent, and ever unmistakable. In some of his productions, Pitt is remorselessly ridiculed, as well as his measures and associates. In others, Fox, his great political opponent, is treated in the same unceremonious style ; so are Burke, Sheridan, and others of that political party. It would therefore appear that he worked to order, or upon impulse, irre- spective of any settled political opinions. Gillray was fortunate in making the acquaintance of Miss Humphrey, the print publisher of St. James's Street. In her house he resided for many years, her trade in prints being mainly if not entirely supported by Gillray's great reputation as a caricaturist. Their mutual interests thus bound together, it was but natural that marriage would ensue, and it is stated as a fact that Gillray and Miss Humphrey actually started from their residence with this intention. On their way to the church, it appears that both the proposed victims to the conjugal yoke, reflecting deeply on their awful position, mutually agreed not to marry, and joyfully returned in single blessedness ! Her shop was one well suited for Gillray's purpose, his victims were unconsciously walking daily to and fro along the street, and under cover of the shop window, Gillray, pencil in hand, took off the heads of Ministers and the Opposition. In this way he became so familiar with their features, that he could drolly exaggerate the nose and lank figure of the Heaven -born Minister, William Pitt, almost out of humanity ; and yet preserve so much likeness, that the portrait was immediately recognised. So with the bulky figure of Fox, the Bardolphian nose of Sheridan, and the personal peculiarities of other public men. This means of satiric art was but seldom practised by any English caricaturist before Gillray. The severity and fearful amount of ridicule at his command ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. 119 exposed him to threats of personal chastisement, and sometimes to the probability of a prosecution. Fox was more than once disposed to enter an action against the artist or the publisher, but thought better of it. Burke was severely attacked, generally as a Jesuit priest, but he knew that by prosecuting the carica- turist the sale would be enormously increased. The good nature even of Sheridan was put to a severe test by the unsparing pencil of Gillray. In the end, they considered it better to let the offensive prints pass by, without taking any steps to restrain their publication, which latter plan would only have become an excellent advertisement : so the satirised senators sat down, and gratified themselves by enjoying a hearty laugh at each other ! Gillray' s imagination was constantly on the rack for subjects, requiring the exercise of invention. The rapidity with which the operations of drawing, etching, biting-in, finishing, printing, and finally publishing while any particular event was fresh on the public mind, all depending on the energy of the artist, proved eventually to be a great strain on his intellect. Political events arose quickly at this time, and party-spirit was very bitter. To keep pace with the public demands for satire, Gillray had scarcely any time left for recreation, therefore he indulged in stimulants. George III. was himself one of the most constant customers of Miss Humphrey, for he had ordered that every caricature by Gillray should be delivered at the palace, even wet from the press. While the poor King was in possession of his right senses, he even took hints in domestic matters from the satirist.' Queen Charlotte, full of German bombast and etiquette, set up the royal babies at first as objects of devotion, by their holding a sort of levee for the Court ladies. Gillray gave a comic repre- sentation of this absurd proceeding. So utterly ridiculous did he make it appear, that the King was induced to put an end to the royal nonsense, and was reported to have said to the Oueen, " Won't do ! won't do, Charlotte ! " In 1792 the expensive war with France placed the Government in a position of financial difficulty, requiring all the commanding eloquence of Pitt to defend it. Revolutionary principles were spreading widely. Great dissatisfaction was manifested. Serious riots had occurred, and a rebellion broke out in Ireland. In this state of public affairs, it was deemed necessary in 1797 to order the Bank of England to suspend cash payments, and to pay dividends with paper, notes for £1 and £2 being a legal tender. A proceeding so detrimental to public credit caused 120 AN ESSAY ON intense disgust, and was of course used by the Opposition party to annoy and damage the Government. Gillray fell foul of Pitt and his party in a clever caricature, of which the two principal heads are here given. Group 32 presents us with two versions of John Bull, by Gill- ray. The one dated 1797 gives our old friend John in a fix, as well he might be, at receiving tissue paper instead of gold, when he went to the Bank for his dividend. In the entire caricature Pitt tenders the notes to John Bull, while Sheridan and Fox strongly dissuade him from taking anything but gold. The issue of a paper currency alluded to took place on March 1st, 1797. John has pushed his hat on the back of his head, having duly stimulated his thoughts by scratching his long flaxen hair. Simple Farmer John has a terribly puzzled expression, for Sheridan (the next head) is looking over his shoulder, saying to him, " Don't take his notes! Nobody takes notes now; they won't even take mine/" This clever hit at Sheridan's notoriously bad faith in money matters, strange to say, again roused his indignation. He complained bitterly of this caricature, and even threatened legal proceedings against the publisher. The head dated 1803 presents poor John in a bad way, quite a contrast to his usual jolly condition. Napoleon, then Consul, made demands upon our Government, which Mr. Addington, alias the Doctor, seemed inclined to grant. This provoked much in- dignant feeling in the country, so Gillray seized his etching needle and caricatured the party favourable to this step. The print was named " Doctor Sangrado curing John Bull of repletion," May 2nd, 1803. Poor John, with his head bandaged, is being bled, almost to the point of fainting, by Doctor Adding- ton, the Prime Minister; the blood issuing from his arm is marked " Malta," " Cape of Good Hope," and other places pro- posed to be ceded, Bonaparte receiving it in a tremendous cocked hat, while Fox and Sheridan bring warm water! This head is a curious variation on the well-known jolly farmer-like expression of John Bull. A hollow peace had been patched up between France and England, so the leading Liberals rushed off to Paris to pay their respects to the First Consul. The party consisted of Fox, lords Erskine, Holland, Grey, and a great number of their supporters, all of whom became food for Gillray' s satiric appetite. The diabolical-looking head to the right of Group 32 is an example of Gillray' s power of personal exaggeration. By a few GROUP 32. 'Page J2Q DRAWN BY R. w. BUSS. SELECTIONS from GILLRAY. ENGLISH GRAPHIC SATIRE. I 2 I magic touches Fox's massive features became fitted for those of Satan. Gillray's powerful imagination and facile hand have given a wonderful representation of the bloody Reign of Terror. The demon of revolution, with horribly distorted and mysterious features, crowned with the insatiable guillotine, and clad in an ensanguined coat, sits fearfully triumphant on the well-known cap of liberty. The monster is of course " sans culottes." His boots indicate the strides taken by this demon throughout unhappy France. Though grotesque and extravagant, it produces a powerful effect upon the imagination, and really combines the comic element with the truly horrible which characterise the events of the great French Revolution. On the left is a caricature of Lord Salisbury, as the Lord Chamberlain in attendance on the marriage of the King of Wur- temberg with Princess Charlotte, daughter of George III. This is one of the richest specimens of personal caricature amongst the many produced by Gillray. The illustration on the right of this group is curious, as it represents the "Heaven-born" Billy Pitt as the victim of a tender passion for the Hon. Miss Eden. Pitt is said to have been much attached to this lady, and it was with great pain that he felt obliged to sacrifice his affection for her in consequence of the incessant demands upon him by the all-important political events of the time. A marriage between them was considered as likely to take place, and became the talk of the public. So tempting an opportunity for the exercise of Gillray's comic powers was not to be lost, consequently this caricature, called "The Garden of Eden," was executed by him. The lady is handsome and graceful in her attitude, but the lover! — never was lover more unlovely, more awkward, more ridiculous than is the Prime Minister, William Pitt, under the whimsical pencil of our great pictorial satirist. The complete subject has Cupids abound- ing, carrying blue ribbons and orders, while coronets spring up like mushrooms from the earth. The French landed in Pembrokeshire, Feb. 14th, 1797, but were warmly received, for those of the invaders who were not killed on the spot were made prisoners. The caricature represents Pitt as having caught the invading demon round the waist, when the fiend is discovered to be Fox ! In 1799 Sir Francis Burdett, then a young and liberal member of the Commons moved for an inquiry into the state of Coldbath Fields prison. His habit of wearing a very large lock of hair over R I 122 AN ESSAY ON his forehead offered a tempting opportunity to the caricaturists, of which they availed themselves to the utmost. Gillray, in one of his morbid fits of patriotism, etched a savage caricature of Fox, entitled " A Democrat," March ist, 1793. He is represented as a brutal monster, besmeared with blood, roaring out " ca ira," and frantically dancing amidst scenes of bloodshed. The head of the figure is selected for the illustration. Poor Fox was deeply wounded in his feelings by this caricature, as it held up to public execration undeservedly one of the kindest natures ever possessed by man. A death's head, crowned with the cap of liberty, is one of Gillray's grim inventions. A crimsoned skeleton, mounted on stilts, stalks over a scene of desolation and murder, amidst which are the roast beef of Old England, crown, sceptre, and other insignia of royalty and nobility. Gillray too frequently lent his powerful talents to attack private character in a manner not justifiable. In this print, Alderman Boydell, who had expended no less a sum than ^400,000 in fostering the arts of painting and engraving, and had repeatedly commissioned all the great painters and engravers of the English school to illustrate Shakspeare and Milton, is ruthlessly attacked. Some low-minded, malicious person had damaged a few of the pictures exhibited at the " Shakspeare Gallery in Pall Mall," by gashing them with a knife. This act was by a base insinuation attributed to Boydell himself, as a means of puffing off his specu- lation ; so he is represented as cutting the pictures purposely. Boydell, who had done so much for art, might at least have been spared by an artist's hand. One of Gillray's most popular caricatures was " Pitt uncork- ing Old Sherry," in which the Opposition Members were repre- sented as bottles. The great statesman uncorks a bottle of old sherry, which bounces sadly and is full of froth. Sheridan was so tickled by this idea that he immediately sent to Miss Humphrey's for half-a-dozen copies, and, more extraordinary, he paid for them, the receipt for which is now preserved, as a great curiosity, at the British Museum. Pitt's head, selected from this caricature, is introduced in the group illustrating the "Principles of Carica- ture," page 16. Gillray was the first artist who endeavoured to symbolise that terrible ill "to which flesh is heir," the gout, and it must be admitted that he has succeeded marvellously (Group 33). The sufferer's foot, swollen and inflamed, lies completely at the mercy of a horrible fiend, furnished with powerful and sharp claws, which GROUP 33.