I ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/rockinghanncastleOOwise Rockingham Castle from the North-Wei- Page 119. ^OG^JINGHAM GASTDE AND THE WATSONS. BY C. WISE, " Awake, awake, for whom these times were kept, O wake, wake, wake, as you had never slept I And are we then To live agen With men ? " — Ben Jonson. Xon5on : ELLIOT STOCK, 62, PAiiiRNOsxER Row. Ikcttering : W. E. & J. GOSS, Market Place. 1891, [all rights reserved.] " 'Tis not time wasted to talk -with antique lore, And all the labours of the dead ; for thence The musing mind may bring an ample store Of thoughts that will her labours I'ecompeuse. The dead held converse with the soul, and hence He that commuueth with them, doth obtain A partial conquest over time." BiM, Museum. TO THE MEMORY OF THE HONOURABLE RICHARD AND LAVINIA WATSON — WHOSE LOVING APPRECIATION AND CARE, AIDED BY THE KNOWLEDGE AND TASTE OF WILLING FRIENDS, RENOVATED IN ITS OLD AGE, AND ADDED FRESH BEAUTY TO, THE CASTLE OF WHICH IT TREATS,— THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED. PREFACE. LONGrSIDE of the feverish craving for change and for some- KK. thing new, characteristic of the latter part of the nineteenth •M century, there has grown up a very laudable endeavour to I preserve from oblivion the history of old family places by means of monographs, of which such books as " Dunster," " The Vine," and, of a much earlier date, " The Black Book of Breadalbane," are such interesting examples. In the pi'esent instance the original intention Avas merely to compile under one cover the greater part of what has already been written on the more ancient history of Rockingham, and to continue it briefly to the present day. But, on the valuable services of the author being called in to examine and tabulate a mass of papers preserved in the Castle, so much was found of considerable interest which had not yet seen the light, that the pi-esent form of narrative was adopted, which, it is hoped, may be of some value not only as a contribution to the Archaeology of Northampton.shire, but as one more side- light thrown on the bye-ways of English history. The close search which has been made among the documents at the Castle has brought to light several points connected with the history of the family which have hitherto remained in some obscurity. Certain erroneous ideas, founded upon tradition, respecting the taking of the Castle by the Parliamentary forces, and of Sir Lewis Watson's conduct at the time of the Great Rebellion, are hei-e corrected, and the actual facts for the first time placed before the public. G. L. W. Rockingham Castle, March, 1891. INTRODUCTION ATHER moi'e than a centnry has elapsed since Sir John Feun published that marvellous series of literary photographs of domestic, social, and national life in England, dui-ing the fifteenth century, known as " The Paston Letters." The avidity with which that work was purchased, — the whole edition having been sold in less than a fortnight, — proves that the general public appreciated that novel and graphic form of history. * And, notwithstanding the doubts which some reviewei's professed to I entertertain of the utility of such documents as materials for history, since that time the value of every letter, diary, or other personal i-ecord, written by our remote ancestors, has been more and more recognized by the historian, not only as affording him the surest insight into the manners and habits of the people of a given period, but also as giving him a firmer grasp of the history of that period by, as it were, placing him in the position of a spectator of the events he would record. Hence the laboi'ious researches amongst the manuscript treasures of the British Museum, the Public Record Office, &c., which our best modern historians have prosecuted before they ventured to write, and hence the greater breadth of view, and the greater minuteness and accuracy in details, which render the results of their labours so valuable. Impressed by the justice of this estimate of the value of documents contempor- aneous with the events of which it is proposed to compile a record, it occurred to the present wiiter, when he was called upon to look over and index the extensive collection of manuscripts at Rockingham Castle, that he had lighted upon a rich mine of materials from which to compile a monograph of the Watson Family, and of their historic residence. X. INTRODUCTION. Encouraged and assisted by Mr. "Watson in this somewliat daring undertaking, he has endeavoured, in the following pages, to give a succinct chronological account of Rockingham Castle, from the time of its erection, and of the family which has held it since it ceased to be a royal possession. The collection of manuscripts above referred to has furnished the basis of the history of the family, but, by the kindness of the Duchess Dowager of Buccleuch, the aiathor has been able to still further enrich his pages with interesting extracts from the manuscript collections of the late Lord Montagu, at Ditton Park. The generous readiness with which Earl Sondes gave access to the family documents preserved at Lees Court, and the facilities provided by Lady Sondes to make those documents available, are most gratefully acknowledged by the author. Some obscure points in the family history have been cleared up by the aid of the Lees Court Papers. Availing himself of the manuscript treasures thus placed at his disposal, the writer has endeavoured to bring the reader into personal communication with various members of the Watson family, by, as it were, making them live again in their letters and other contemporaneous documents. A large amount of supplementary information has been gained from those rich storehouses: — the British Museum, the Record Office, Somerset House, and the Bodleian Library. For the history of the Castle, the writer has relied chiefly upon two admirable papers upon the subject, which appeared in the Archteological Journal, — the earlier paper by the Revd. C. H. Hartshorne, the later by Mr. G. T. Clark. To Mr. Clark's paper, he acknowledges himself indebted for what may be called the architectural history of the Castle, as distinguished from its history as a royal residence ; and he gratefully acknowledges Mr. Clark's kindness in allowing him to copy the suggestive ground plan of Rockingham Castle, which appeared in his paper. For the details of the royal visits, &c., he has borrowed extensively from Mr. Hartshorne's paper, but he has been able to add other interesting items of information from the National Records. INTRODUCTION. xi. He has also to thank the Revd. H. J. Bigge, for the readiness with which he placed at the author's disposal the valuable results of his many years' research into the history of the Castle, and for several useful suggestions which he has made during the progress of the work. Chapter VI. has been contributed, over the signature " G. L. W.," in order to bring the history of the Castle down to the present day. The chapter on Rockingham Forest, has been compiled from " A Treatis uppon Forestes Parkes Chases & free Warrens " by William Fleetwood, Recorder of London, preserved amongst the manuscripts in the British Museum — from Manwood's Forest Laws ; from that exhaustive woi'k. The Forest of Essex, by W. R. Fisher (a perfect model for future historians of the Royal Forests) ; and from a mass of documents upon the subject in the Record Office. Interesting cases of illegal hunting have been added from the Rockingham Papers, and other sources. This chapter the writer believes to be the first attempt to give a connected history of Rockingham Forest ; and ho hopes the subject may hereafter be undertaken by a more competent hand, and be treated in the exhaustive manner it deserves. The sources which have furnished the materials for the history of the Hereditary Mastership of the Royal Buckhounds will be found noticed in the article itself, but the writer desires here to express his thanks to Professor Montagu Burrows for his valuable corrections in the earlier portions of the proof sheets of that article. The family documents, printed by Mr. Watson's permission amongst the Notes, will be found not the least interesting portions of this volume. To the Revd. Canon Yates the author acknowledges a deep debt of gratitude for his assistance in the correction of certain portions of the proof sheets of this work, and for many happy suggestions. The writer has also to thank the following gentlemen for lightening his labours : — Mr. Chas. H. Montagu Douglas Scott, by his untiring and valuable aid in elucidating some difficult points in heraldry, which have been encountered xii. INTRODUCTION. in the course of this work ; — the Revds P. M. Smythe, and M. W. Hay, of Rockingham; C. J. Percival, of Lyddington ; W. R. P. Waudby, late of Stoke Albany; H. C. Holmes, of Garthorpe ; H. H. N. Howard, of Weekley; W. S. Bagshaw, of Great Gidding ; and J. F. Mercer, of East Carlton, by granting him special facilities for searching the registers of their respective parishes. The Initial Designs, Tail Pieces, and the Plan of the Fortifications of the Keep are from clever pen-and-ink sketches kindly made for the anthor by Mr. S. Perkins Pick, A.R.I.B.A., of Leicester. The frontispiece is from a drawing by Mr. E. C. Frere, A.R.I.B.A. The photographs of the porti'aits were taken by Broadhead of Leicester, and the views are from photographs by Knighton of Kettering, and Drake of Uppingham. It is the hope of the writer that, in the following pages, the reader Avill find a pleasing panorama of the place and people brought under his notice, and not a mere bird's-eye view, as furnished by a dry historical record of events. In submitting the result of his labours to the keen eye of the critic, the author has the satisfaction of being able to say with Cicero : — " Mihi quidem ita jucunda hujus libri confectio fuit, ut non modo omnes absterserit senectntis molestias, sed effecerit mollem etiam et jucundam senectntem." Weekley, March, 1891. CONTENTS. Dedication Preface Intkoduction ........... Chapter 1. The Rockingham Castle of History .... „ 2. Three Edwards ,, 3. Sir Lewis Watson — Prosperity ..... Sir Lewis Watson (afterwards first Baron Rockingham, of Rockingham Castle), — Adversity F]dward, second Baron Rockingham, and the Went- worths ; the Earls of Rockingham; tlie Viscounts Sondes; the Marquises of Rockingham ; the Barons Sondes (Monson-Watson and Milles) ; and the ^ Rockingham Watsons. Rockingham Castle in 1891, a Chapter for the Tourist, by G. L. W. 4 7. Rockingham Forest, with a brief sketch of the Here- ditary Mastership of the Royal Buckhounds Notes and Documents — A. The Will of Edward Watson, Esq., of Lyddington B. The Three Bishops of Lincoln C. The Will of Mrs. Anne Digby D. Mrs. Anne Digby's Inventory E. The Will of Anne, Lady Watson . E2. The Inventory of Sir Edward Watson, of Stoke Park F. Fees paid on the Creation of Lewi.s, 1^' Baron Rockingham G. Some Manoinal Possessions of the Watsons — Bringhurst, Drayton, and Easton Magna . PAGE V. vii. ix. 1 18 48 60 86 118 128 183 191 I9i 197 208 ■ 210 212 213 213 xiv. CONTENTS. PAGE G-. Coton, or The Cottons 215 Garthorpe ........ .... 216 Great Gidding 217 Kettering 218 Lyddington . . . . . . " . . . . . 224 Rockingham ........... 225 Stoke Albany a-nd Wilbarston . , 226 Stoke Park 229 H. Statement of Sir George Sondes ........ 231 I. Rockingham Chiircli .......... 233 Additions and Coubections 255 Pedigrees — 1. Pedigree of the Watsons of Rockingham Castle. 2. Pedigree of the Montagus of Bough ton. 3. Pedigree of the Digbys of ]3ry Stoke. 4. Pedigree of Manners. 5. Pedio-ree of Wentworth. 6. Pedigree of Monson. 7. Pedigree of Sondes. Index. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE Frontispiece. Rockingliain Castle fi'om the North-West, from a drawing by E. C. Frere to face Title Page Initial Letter A, from design by 8. Perkins Pick ...... vii. Initial Letter R, from design by 8. Perkins Pick ...... ix. Ground Plan op Rockinguam Castle, from 0. T. Clark . . to face 1 Initial Design. — Doorway in Mural Towhr, from pen-and-ink sketch by 8. Perkins Pick .......... \ Tail Piece. — The Entrance Towers, from sketch by 8. Perkins Pick . . 17 Initial Design. — Mural Tower at Lyddington, from sketch by 8. Perkins Pick 18 Portrait of Edward Watson, cir. 1552, from Portrait by Holbein (?) photographed by Broadhead ....... to face 25 Portrait of Edward Watson (artist unknown), photographed by Broadhead .......... to face 32 Rockingham Castle from the Beech Thees, from photograjyh by Drake to face 42 Tail Piece. — Lyddington Church and Bishop's Palace, from sketch by 8. Perkins Pick ........... 47 Initial Design. — Entrance Court, from sketch by 8. Perkins Pick ... 48 Sir Lewis Watson cir. 1620, from portrait by Michael Wright, photographed by Broadhead ......... to face 55 Tail Piece. — North Front of Rockingham Castle, /rom sketch by 8. Perkins Pick 59 Initial Design. — Stoke Albany Manor House, from sketch by 8. Perkins Pick 60 Old Plan op Fortifications of the Keep, copied by 8. Perkins Pick . . 66 Sir Lewis Watson, First Baron Rockingham, cir. 1650, from portrait by Michael Wright, photographed by Broadhead . ... to face 78 Tail Piece. — The Terrace Front, from sketch by 8. Perkins Pick ... 85 Initial Design. — "Cavalier Relicks," from sketch by 8. Perkins Pick . . 86 xvi. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE Lady Catharine Sondes, from a portrait by Sir Feter Lely, photographed by Broadhead .......... to face 101 Grace Pelham, Wipe op Lewis, First Baron Sondes, from portrait by Angelica Kauffmann, photographed by Broadhead . . . to face 113 Tail Piece. — Walker's House, from sketch by S. Perkins Pick .... 117 Initial Desion — "The Street," /?'om sketch by S. Perkins Pick . . . 118 The Yew Hedge, from a photograph by Brake . .... to face 124 Tail Piece. — Ancient Chests, &c., from sketch by 8. Perkins Pick . . 127 Initial Design. — Woodland Scene, from photograph by Knighton . . . 128 Flanker and Remains op Keep, /rom photograph by Knighton . to face 160 Tail Piece. — Stocks and Whipping Post at Geetton, fro7)i sketch by S. Perkins Pick 179 Rockingham Castle prom the East, from photograph by Knighton . to face 213 Grohnd Plan of Rockingham Castlk, Copii'd hy pennU^idu from a Finn hij G. T. CJark. Chapter First. THE ROCKINGHAM CASTLE OF HISTORY. Tfieir engines eke they rearM, iuid witli irrcat art Repaired each bulwark, turret, port and tow'r, And fortify'd the plain and easy part To bide the storm of every warlike stour, Till as they thought, no sleight or force of mart To undermine or scale the same had pow'r. (Fairfax' Translation of Tasso, Book 18, Stan. 47.) 1 H E traveller by the Midland loop line from Nottiupfham to Kettering, when he leaches the Rutland end of that triumph of modern , engineering — the Seaton Viaduct, comes upon one of the most charming pastoral scenes that can be imagined. A broad and luxuriant valley, comprising some of the richest grazing land in the counti'v, lies spread out before him. Ages ago this valley doubtless formed the bed of iui estuai'y of the sea, which, following the immutable law of nature, that change, decay, and death in one age shall be the fountains of life for succeeding ages, has long since receded, and the rich alluvium it has de- posited is the source to which we are indebted for the unrivalled pasturage now found there. The only trace left of this once broad e.Kpanse of water is a narrow stream, tine Fatal Welland." the " Holv Welland " of 2 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. Michael Drayton, which gives its name to the valley through which it gently flows, with many windings. On the north of this vallej'^ lie the somewhat imposing hills of Rutland and Leicestershire, whilst in front of him, the traveller sees the gentle and well wooded slopes of the Northamptonshire hills. To add to the thoroughly English character of the scene, villag(> after village is seen dotted about the valley, and on the hill sides; sometimes standing boldlj^ out, like a sentinel upon a commanding height, as in the case of Bringhurst; sometimes hidden in a hollow, between suri'ounding slopes, as Lyddington ; or lying basking in the open champaign country, as are Caldecott and Great Easton ; or gently winding up the hill-side, like Rockingham. Over the whole of these villages, and the greatei- portion of the valley, the family whose history it is proposed to trace in the following pages, once held seigniorial rights ; and ovei- nnxch of the same district the pi'esent representative of the Rockingham branch of that family still wields a beneficent influence; and his home — the home of his ancestors foi- more than three hundred years, the statel}^ Castle of Rockingham — is seen standing upon the extreme northerly point of a bold pi-omontory above Rockingham, and commanding the valley and villages beneath. As this Castle was, during Ave centuries, a royal residence, and indeed was, for a considerable period, virtually the Windsor Castle of the Midlands, a sketch of its history will doubtless be acceptable to the reader.^ Some arch^ologists profess to find traces of a British fortress having occupied the site of the present Castle. Certainly the situation was one which a tribe of our rude forefathers would be likely to utilize for pui-poses of defence or aggression. There are tolerably clear evidences that their conquerors, the Romans, availed themselves of the commanding position to erect a fortress here, probably for the protection of a road which they had made across the valley beneath. Still more distinct are the traces of a Saxon stronghold having existed here. Indeed, Doomsday Book tells us that it was held by tlie warlike Bovi ; and it was, in all probability, his fortress which the Conqueror converted into a Castle. If the reader, who is unable to visit the place itself, will take an ordnance map of the north-eastern portion of Northamptonshire, and look at the spot where Rockingham is marked, he will be better able to understand the nature of the stronghold which so long served as a secure dwelling for the royal and other owners of the fertile valley below it, and as a sort of police station, from which to watch over the security of that part of the royal forest of Rockingham which extended to the south and east of it. 1 See Introduction for Authorities. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 3 As will be seeu, the pioniontoiy upon which the position of the Castle is indicated, juts out almost duly northwards towards the Welland valley. East and west of it are defiles, or ravines, deepening rapidly towards the north, while on the north is a very precipitous slope down to the valley. It is evident that even a sti'ong stockade on three sides of the summit would render this promontory tolerably secure against an attack in primitive warfare. The weakest point was on the south, abutting the extensive tableland on that side. To protect this side, a mound was, evidently in very early times, constructed towards the south-eastern edge of the promontory ; and this mound was further strengthened, probably at a later date, by two ditches, or moats, extending across the southern part of the promontory. It will thus be seen that the steep declivities on three sides gave a certain amount of natural strength to the position, while the south, or weakest side, was secured by a fortified mound and entrenchments. The constructor of the Castle evidently availed himself of these arrangements, and convei'ting the mound into a strong keep, he enclosed all the northern part of the promontory (a space of close upon fifteen thousand square yards, or about three aci'es), with almost impregnable walls, and dividing the space thus enclosed into three baileys, or courts, he proceeded to erect the various buildings necessary for the housing and protection of himself and his numerous retainers. As the keep was placed at the south-eastern angle of this enclosure, a poi'tion of it must have been outside the curtain walls. But this seems to have been made secure by a ditch. How early the Castle assumed this form is not known positively, but G. T. Clark, one of our safest authorities upon this subject, gives it as his opinion that there are no traces of masonry so old as the eleventh century. But, as the reader will sec further on, in the numerous repaii's and rebuildings recorded, ti-aces of the original buildings may have disappeared ; but we know, on the authority of Doomsday Book, that tlie Castle was ei'ected by order of the Conqueror. The space between the southern curtain and the moats, or ditches, is supposed to have served the purpose of a tilt-yard. Some idea of the sti'ength ultimately given to this royal fortress may be gathered from Leland's description of it, as he saw it in ruins, in Henry VIII. 's time, before it passed into the possession of the present owners. He says : " The Castelle of Rockingham standith upon the toppee of an hille, right stately, and hath a mighty diche, and bullwarks agayne without the diche. The utter waulles of it yet stond. The kepe is exceeding fair and strong, and in the waulles be certein strong towers. The lodgings that were within the area of the Castelle be discovered and faule to mine. One thing in the waulles of this Castelle is much to be noted, that is that they be embattelid on booth the sides, so that if the aiea of the Castelle were won 4 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. by cumming in at either of the two greate gates of the Castelle, yet the kepers of the waulles might defend the Castelle. I marked that there is a strong tower in the area of the Castelle, and from it over the dungeon dike is a drawbridge to the dungeon towx'e."! Such was the Castle which served the sovereigns of England, during several centuries, as a secure and agreeable place of retreat, where they could indulge in their favourite pastime of hunting. And having provided a royal residence, there is little doubt that the Conqueror resorted to it occasionally. Unfortunately, no records of his visits have yet been discovered, nor do we know with certainly that his irascible son, Rufus, visited it more than once ; but as that visit was on an occasion of great importance, and the historian who records it makes no comment upon the place of the meeting, as we might have expected him to do had the king not been in the habit of resorting there, we may safely infer this was not the first or only visit of the Red King to Rockingham. The circumstances connected with this visit furnish us Avith some idea of the extent of, and the accommodation provided by, the buildings within the Castle precincts at this date. The occasion was Sunday, lltli March, 1095 (Mid-lent Sunday), when William, in compliance with the request of Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury, summoned a council of British nobles, bishops, and clergy to meet him at Rockingham Castle, to decide the question, " Utrum salva reverentia et obedientia sedis Apostolicas posset Archiepiscopus (Anselmus) fldem terreno regi servare, annon ? " The chapel of the Castle must have been very extensive to receive so large an assemblage ; and as the consultation extended over more than two days, there must have been ample accommodation within the Castle to lodge the very numerous guests. A graphic account of this great meeting (too long to be transcribed here), will be found in the Rev. W. Turner's abridgement of Hasse's Life of Anselm, and in Freeman's Life of Eifus. It is }'elated of the Archbishop that twice in the course of the protracted deliberations, he, being left alone in the chapel, while the king and council retired to consult together, was found by the messengers quietly sleeping, with the wall for a pillow. While he thus sat alone in the chapel, a common soldier is said to have entered, " and embracing his knees, said ' Holy Father, thy children fervently entreat thee, through me, let not thine heart fail thee, whatever thou art obliged to bear, but think on Job who sat in the ashes, and yet was prepared for the Devil, and thus avenged Adam who had submitted to him.' " It is curious to meet, thus early in tlie liistory of this Castle, with a common soldier of the "godly and exhorting" type, 1 Lelaud, Itin 1, 14. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 5 somewhat like those who, five hundred years later, for a time had illegal possession of it. Notwithstanding the absence of records of royal visits here during the reigns of Henry I., Stephen, and Henry TI., we may safely infer those sovereigns did occasionally come to Rockingham, or why did Hemy I. spend twenty shillings upon a vineyard at the Castle, and allow an annual salary of thiity shillings for a vinedresser there ? or why was Stephen so particular about the appointment of a constable ? or Henry II. so careful that the due number of watchmen, &c., were kept there, and allow £4 lis. 3d. annually to pay their salaries? When the sovereign was not at the Castle, the care of it devolved upon a constable, generally a prominent partisan of the king, who seems to have held that honoui-able, but responsible position during the royal pleasure, by payment of an annual rent, or fine. His duties appear to have comprised the defence of the Castle, the guarding of all royal rights, the regulation of tournaments held at the Castle, protecting the property of the Church, and, as will be seen, the safe custody of all jnisouers sent to the Castle, and the assisting at the execution of traitors. In return, he enjoyed valuable perquisites and privileges. The garrison of the Castle appears to have been partly composed of men furnished by the holders of certain manors, whose tenure obliged them to send one or more men for that purpose. Thus the manor of Benefieid was held on condition of " providing one soldier to keep guard at Rockingham Castle." The names of the following manors, which were held by this service, are preserved by Clark, but the list is stated to be incomplete : Little Billing, Cottingham, Aldwinkle, Cogenhoe, Harwedon, Hanington, Horton, Isham, Uphall, Watton, and the barony of Chipping Wai-den. The Rockingham Papers enable us to add to this list Weston. Sutton, and Dingley. " The sums for which this service was commuted ranged from twenty pence to seventy-five shillings annually, and were assessed at five shillings for a knight's fee." ^ Berangarius le Moygne, who built Barnwell Castle, was bound to pay twenty pence annually towards the ward of Rockingham Castle. The manors of Lanton, Upanry, and Hole, and certain lands in Medbourne were each held on the condirion of jjroviding the king with one barbed arrow, when he came to Rockingham to hunt. The commutation money, under the name of Castle-guard rent, was collected by the Castle bailiff, an hereditar3- office seemingly held by men in a good position. This officer enjoyed several perquisites, amongist which was that of " his diet when the king or his constable was in residence." The names of the constables appointed by the two Williams and the first Henry 1 Clark. 6 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. have not yet been recovered, but we find Stephen appointed William Malduit to that office, and no other appointment is recorded until the last year of Richard I., when Robert Mauduit was made constable, for which honour' he paid an annual fine of one hundred pounds. As Richard I. spent so few weeks of his reign in England, we cannot suppose he visited this Castle on more than the one occasion of which a record remains. On his escape from captivity and return to England, he seems, immediately after taking Nottingham, to have visited his castles in the Midlands, for early in 1194 he and William the Lion, king of Scotland, were at Rockingham Castle, spent the Good Friday at Geddington Castle, and went on to Noi'thampton Castle. The reader of Ivanhoe will see from this fact in local histoi-y that the Great Romancist was, as usual, almost literally following the course of history in making the Midland counties the earliest part of his kingdom visited by Coeur de Lion upon his retm^n. It is very probable that his treacherous brother had already appropriated " the Ville of Rockingham," which had been given to Queen Berengaria, and was, after Richard's death, seized and given by John to his own queen, Isabella. To the restless John this Castle seems to have frequently been a passing place of refuge, for we find him here, in common with his other Midland Castles, after most of his serious reverses. Thus immediately after his reverses in France, and the loss of Normandy, he retired here, by way of Geddington, in August, 1204, to " spaciate " in the glorious forest, and to meditate on revenging himself upon Philiis, and regaining his lost dominions in France. Being thwarted early in the summer of the following year in his project of leading into France the army he had collected at Portsmouth, he, in Sejjtember of that year (1205) came on fi'om Preston to Rockingham to sulk, and to prepare himself for a fresh political leap, this time against the Pope. It is not unlikely that the ninepence recorded in the Rolls as having been paid in this year to the king's messenger, Scogernell, for going to Rockingham, was earned by that individual by bearing a notice of the intended royal visit. Finding his contest with Innocent to be like fighting the air, John came from Lamport to Rockingham, on Tuesday, the 20th Februaiy, 1207, and remained four days. During this stay he was occupied with much letter writing. He came again in the autumn of the same year, and received " in his chamber at Rockingham " from David, Earl of Huntingdon, one hundred pounds due on an impress. As if in derision of the Pojje's interdict just launched against his kingdom, he came to enjoy himself again at Rockingham in the delightful month of July, 1208, coming on from King's Cliff on Saturday, and remaining' until Tuesday. Again in November he sj^ent Advent Sunday here. He consoled himself for the sentence of excommunication, pronounced upon him the next year, by visiting this " happy ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 7 hunting ground " three times, in April, September, and November, spendino- some days here on the last occasion. During his visits this year, he is recorded to have " wandered among the forests and rivers," and indeed to have given himself up to pleasure, spending his time between his Castles of Rockingham, Clyve (King's Cliff), and Geddington. We have on record that playing " tables " with the Earl of Salisbury at Clyve, he lost at one time 4s. 10|d., and at another time 4s. lid. The sentence of excommunication evidently had no terrors for him. He was here again in 1210. And in 1212, having at Northampton listened with insolent contempt to Pandulf proclaiming his deposition by the Pope, he figuratively snapped his fingers at him, and on 10th July came to enjoy himself at Rockingham, from whence he wrote to acknowledge the receipt of a coat of mail, formerly belonging to the Earl of Chester. The next year, 1213, he changed his constable, replacing Hikjo de Nevil by Roger de Nevil, who, two days after the appointment, was entrusted with the custody of nine pi'isoners. And in Septembei- of the same year John came again, but was probably too much occupied in counterplotting against his barons to spend much time here. His military enterpi-ises on the continent during 1214 occupied so much of his time, that he did not pay one visit to this Castle ; but that he was careful for its safety, and for his own comfort when he should come again is evidenced by his spending £127 8s. 6d. on a new tower and chamber, and his ordering one cask of the best wine that could be found in London to be sent to Rockingham for his own di'inking. It is probable that the present gateway is referred to in the entry above given, foi- Clark assigns it to the year 1200. In April of 1215, the year of the Great Charter, he sent Peter de Barr and Nicholas de Hugeville, foot cross-bowmen, to be placed in Rockingham Castle for its defence, and commanded them to be paid six peiice ii day each as long as they remained. 'J'his was a good sum in those days, and indicates that they must have been trusted men. It would appear from this strengthening of the garrison that John felt some anxiety about the safety of the Castle in his strained relations with his subjects. His desire to please some of his barons is seen in a command issued next month to the constable that he is to receive William de Harcourt at the Castle, if he comes thither, and treat him hospitably. Suspicions of the loyalty of the then constable, Roger de Neville, iiiav have seized the king, for in June the same year, he orders him to give up the command of the Castle to William de Mauduit. In March of this year a man who afterwards made himself consj)icuous in connection with Rockingham Castle came upon the scene. On the 18th of that month, Robert de Veti Ponte was commanded to yield up to William, Count of Albemarle, the manor of Rockingham and all his 8 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. rights. Of this Earl of Albemarle we shall see more presently. In December of this year John came to Rockingham for one day only, probably in the course of his march. He went on to Melton Mowbray. In the year of his final disaster, I2I5, he early took measures for the safety of this Castle. In February he ordered William Malduit, the constable, to fortify it, and "provide men of war" for its defence. On the 3rd March he, while at Bedford, received one hundred marks, the amount of ransom paid by nine prisoners who had been detained at Rockingham since 1213, and the next day sent there four other prisoners. The constable seems again to have been changed, for a receipt for the above ransom is made out to William Aindre, who, the same day, was ordered to pay the garrison at the rate of three pence a day. Bent upon defeating the invading Louis, and avenging himself upon his rebellious barons, John was here on the 20th and 21st September of this year, probably on his way to Berwick, for the next day, 22nd September, he went to Lincoln. This is his last recorded visit to, but not his last act in connection with, the Castle, for on the 16th October, just two days before his death, he issued a pei'emptoi-y order to the constable to pay the garrison. One act of John's deserves mention here as bearing upon some property, now part of the possessions of the Watson family. In the sixteenth year of his reign, he granted a license to William d'Albini to enclose Stoke Park^ and take foxes and hares there. ^ This nobleman was, two years afterwards, taken prisoner while defending Rochester Castle against the enraged king. Doubtless the young king, Henry III., had visited Hockingham during his father's life. It is evident that the Earl Marshal, Pembroke, while he held the reins of government, and aftei' his deatli, the equally great Justiciary, Hubeft de Burgh, undeistood the value of this Castle, and took care that it should not suffer from neo'lect. William Aindre was continued in the office of constable, and was insti-ucted not to molest the property of the Abbey of Peterborough, but to excuse the conti'ibution it paid to the Castle, and to make peace with the abbot. In this year, 1217, the unfortunate mistake was made of appointing William, Eail of Albemarle, to be constable of the Castle. He quickly forfeited the confidence of one good man, William Longespee, Earl of Salisbury, who, next year, wrote that the alliance between him and the Ear-1 of Albemarle was at an end, and that he did not hold himself responsible for the Earl's misdeeds.^ He, however, retained the voya\ favour, to the disgust of the justices itinerant of Lincolnshire, who wrote in 1219 to 1 See Note G, Manorial Possessions of the Watsons. 2 Eockingham Papers. 3 Cal. of Letters, Henry III., vol. 1, p. 19. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 9 complain that " they had received a royal letter on behalf of tlie Earl of Albemarle,' which in their opinion put a public affront upon them." ^ The constable I'eceived the king's command to allow Walter Preston to catch forty deer in Rockingham Forest for the royal larder. Whether he opposed this, or whether he had a suspicion of what was impending is not known, but he seems to have thrown ofE his allegiance, for the 30th November the same year (1219) the king writes " The Earl of Albemarle has rebelled against us." ^ Eai'ly in May the following year the young king's mother writes to tell him she has married the Earl of March, and earnestly entreats him to render to her her just rights, including Rockingham Castle, which his father had bequeathed to her. Of course Albemarle refused to surrender the Castle, and the after history of the place might have been altogether different had not the Justiciary conceived the happy thought of " setting a thief to catch a thief." Fawkes de Breaute, who proved himself a most tenacious holder of royal castles, was brought to assist in expelling the rebellious Albemarle. He laid siege to Rockingham Castle, which seems to have offered a strong resistance to the battering-rams, catapults, and other engines of war then in use, and probably it would not have fallen had not the astute de Breaute discovered a means of taking it by surprise, which he did on the 28th June. The capture may have been facilitated by the fact that the gariison was found absolutely without food. Only three loaves were found in this Castle and that of Sauvey together. The young king was bi'ought to witness the .siege on the 26th June, and stayed until the surrender of the Castle. As the king allowed three bucks to William de Albini, and two to William de Insula on the occasion, it is probable they had assisted at the siege. The forty bucks allowed to William de Preston and Richard de Waterville were no doubt for the royal use, but we may hope the half-starving, captured garrison were allowed to taste the venison. This is the first recorded visit of Henry III., who probably did not get a favourable impression of the place, for he is only said to have come once more, and that not till six years afterwards. The siege caused considerable damage to the Castle, and for some years afterwards we read of constant repairs and re-buildings going on. If Albemarle was in the Castle at the time of its capture, he must have been suffered to escape, for in January, 1221, Henry writes to Geoffrey Neville, " The Earl of Albemarle has seized Fotheringhay Castle." After which he seems to have carried on a sort of guerilla warfare, for in February, Robert de Lexinton writes that he has 1 Cal Letters, Henry III., Vol. 1, p. 20. 2 Cal. Letters Henry III., vol. 1, p. 56. 3 Ibid, p. 115. 10 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. *' constant information of the route of tlie Earle of Albemarle, and has provided for the safety of the border." In November of the year of the siege, a grant of one hundi'ed pounds was made to De Breaute for conducting it. A singular instance of the tips and downs which marked the career of the nobles of that lawless pei-iod is presented to us in the fact that shortly after his expulsion from Rockingham Castle, and his subsequent marauding expedition, Albemarle was pardoned, and replaced in court favour, while de Breaute incurred the royal displeasure, and one of his strongest castles, that of Bedford, was besieged by the king in person, and taken, and his brother William and twenty-three knights hanged. De Breaute himself was banished after his wife (an heiress whom he had carried off by force) had been divoi'ced from him ; and seven years after his capture of Rockingham Castle for the king, he was poisoned at St. Cyriac. ^ After 1220 the history of Rockingham Castle is chiefly a record of repair-s and re-buildings. The roofs had been damaged during the siege, and in 1221 twenty marks were spent upon repairing them, and the constable had permission to make rafters, and cleft wood in Rockingham Forest for that purpose, and in the following year ten more marks were spent on these repairs. In 1223 five marks were allowed for repairs to the gutters of the king's chamber. Symptoms of an impending royal visit began now to shew themselves, and in 1224 ten casks of wine were sent to the Castle, and a second supply followed shortly afterwards. Certainly the Rockingham vineyai-d had proved a failure. The next year the repairs were hurried on, the sheriff being ordered to take with him certain men skilled in carpentry and masonry, and see to the repairs of the king's chamber. The timber for this purpose was selected by the foresters, who took a receipt for it. The same energy in restoration was displayed during the early part of 1226, and towards defraying the expenses thus incurred, the sheriffs of Northamptonshire and Bedfordshii'e were each required to furnish twenty marks ; and a load of lead jvas ordered for the roof. At length, on the 16th July of this year, Henry III. came again to the (.Vstle, but his stay was very short, and unless some of the royal family had made it their home, one wonders what was done with all the wine sent to the Castle during the past five years, for in 1230 four more casks were required. Was wine ad lihitum one of the perquisites of the constables ? 1 York Powell. This Falk, or Fawkes de Breaute was a Norman adventurer who proved himself of much service to John in his contests with the barons. He was made governor of several castles and sheriff of six counties. " Although outwardly acting for the king (Henry III J, Falkes abetted the revolt of the Earl of Albemarle in 1220, and secretly supplied him with forces." — " Die. of National Biography." It is therefore possible that the capture of Rockingham Castle by surprise was an ai-ranged thing between de Breaute and Albemarle. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 11 The list of constables is rather confused about this time, but William de Insula and Brian de Insula appear to have filled the office from the time of the siege to about 1231, when William de Ral was appointed, and continued in authority until the appointment of Robert Passelawe in 1245, who. pei'haps rendered indifferent by the infrequency of the royal visits, seems to have allowed things to go from bad to worse, for in 1250 he is reported to have left the towers, the walls and battlements, in a ruinous condition, and the chapel destitute of fittings for divine service. Indeed the laxity of discipline at the Castle at this time is seen in the fact that Simoji le Wayte, whose duty it was to see to the safety of the Castle and to chant the hours, committed a theft and fled for safety. During the remainder of the reign of Henry III., no records of the Castle of interest to the reader have been recovered. Geoffrey de Langley, John Mansel, Hugh de Goldingham, Robert Waleraund, Alan la Zoucli, Peter de Montfort, junioi', Nicholas de Segiave, and Matthew de Columbariis each in succession held the office of constable within the space of fifteen years, n constant change indicating the king's mistrust, but nothing marks the rule of any one of them, unless the fortifying the Castle again in the time of Alan la Zouch may be held to do so. This renewal of anxiety for the safety of the Castle is no doubt to be ascribed to the nnsati.sfactory relations then existing between the king and his barons. But brighter times were in store for our Castle. The new king, the illustrious Edward I., made his fii'st recorded visit here in August, 1275, just a year after his coronation. He probably looked forward to jjuying frequent and prolonged visits to this delightful home in the forest, and bringing with him his queen and her train of ladies, for he at once directed extensive alterations and repairs to be made in the buildings, the execution of which extended over many yeai's. The first work appears to have been the ei-ection of ii new hall, and the walls of this hall, then begun, are supposed to be those which arc now standing, and form the walls of the vestibule, the hall, and dining rooni.i Edwai'd a])pears to have paid a flying visit here in 1277, for in that year the following etitiy appears in the miscellaneous I'oll : " Paid to Thomas de Blathestone for his expenses in taking the greyhounds with the king ninepence, with two pence in bread foi- the same, cm that day which the sniiie Thomas departed from Rokyngham." He was certainly at the Castle again in 1279, once more iu the month of August. He no doubt found the new works well advanced. They included, amongst many other things mentioned in the rolls, a passage and door to the (jueen's chamber, walls about the grass plot near the same chamber, carpentry in the queen's wardrobe, 1 Clark. 12 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. and plumber's work on the gutter of the same (for which the plumber received twenty pence, with an allowance of five pence halfpenny for grease.) There were also extensive repairs made in the "little chamber of the king" and in the "great chamber of the king." The stone was brought from Weldon and Stanion, and the slates from Harringworth. All this preparation for the king and queen indicates at least their intention to visit the Castle. Amongst the items paid for woz'k at this time is the following : " To Rose, the daughter of Alexander the baker, Agnes de Coleville, Avicia Cooke, Avicia, the daughter of the plumber, John Scot, Ivota, the wife of Adam le Chapman, and John Cooke, workpeople, moving the earth with shovels and harrows towards the granary, 5s. 3d. ; each per week, 9d." What would the English sovereign of our time think, if when visiting one of her royal residences, she saw five women busily engaged with shovels and wheelbarrows ? And why is it that names so redolent of poetry are no longer common among our countrywomen ? Some readers may ask " How could these people live on their ninepence a week ? " As a quarter of wheat could then be bought for about four-and-sixpence, a whole bullock for eight-and-sixpence, and a pig for sixpence, and the style of living amongst every class was much less expensive than now, we see that Rose, the Avicias, and Ivota were rich compared with their sisters of the present day. The following year, 1280, Richard de Holbroc was appointed constable for three years, for which honour he paid eighty pounds annually. He seems to have carried on the repairs with great vigour, and probably completed the new hall and other buildings which he found in the course of erection. The Rev. H. J. Bigge has calculated that during the time of this constable more than £20,000, at the present value of money, were spent on the Castle. Absorbed in his project of conquering Wales, and for three yeai'S absent from his kingdom, engaged in a continental struggle, Edward seems to have had no leisure to visit Rockingham for eleven years. In 1290, the year rendered memorable by the death of his devoted queen, he came on the 2nd September, and spent five days at the Castle. Unluckily the records of these royal visits are drawn from the least romantic of all sources, the Patent, Close, and other Rolls, which notice the king's movements only as they connect themselves with public acts, or the national expenditure. We therefore look in vain for any intimation of the presence of the queen, but as it has been beautifully said of her that " She lived his wife in lovely participation of all his troubles and long voyages," and as we know that she was accompanying him in his journey towards Scotland when the illness seized her which terminated fatally at Harby, in Nottinghamshire, on the 28th November, not three months after this visit to Rockingham, we may safely conclude she was at the Castle with him. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 13 What a pageant rises before the imagination ! One can almost see the royal cavalcade as, with all the splendour of armed knights, richly attired ladies on their gorgeously caparisoned horses, and a train of bowmen and falconers, it enters at one of the strongly protected gates of the Castle ; and on the spot where now, at almost the same period of the year, we are accustomed to see crowds assemble to witness a beautiful display of flowers, there ■we can, in fancy, see assembled on an early day in September, six hundred years ago, a crowd of barons, yeomen, and villagers to witness a grand tournament. Again a long interval with no royal visit recorded until the year 1300, when the king is said to have passed the following days at the Castle, i.e. August 20th, 21st, 25th, 26th, and 28th. These dates seem to indicate that he was then spending his time partly at Rockingham, and partly at some other of his royal castles in the forest, probably King's Cliif and Geddington, ^ where the beautiful cross to the memory of his late queen had recently been erected. The year 1290 also proved fatal to one Walter de Levy, a retainer of John de Brabant, who had come to the Castle in the king's train and died there. He ajipears to have been buried with considerable pomp, for the constable, Richard de Holbroc, was allowed £8 lis. lid. for the expenses of his funeral, which took place at Pipewell, his bowels being buried at Rookingliani. The monks of Pipew^ell were allowed twenty shillings, fifty shillings were spent on cloth for the poor, and a banquet was given on the day of his burial. Evidently he was a man of importance. Amongst the prisoners taken at Dunbar in 1294, William, son of John de Moravia, knight, Herbert de Moreham, Alexander le Fitz-Gley, and Gregory Fitz-Owen were committed to Rockingham Castle, and two keepers were assigned for their safe custody. They were detained there 323 days, during which time an allowance of four pence per day was made for the knight, and three pence per day each for the others. As £1 16s. Od. was spent at the same time on repairs of the chamber in the tower and the chamber near the gate, these were probably their respective places of confinement. The hall and kitchen also underwent some repairs. In 1299, Edward settled that Rockingham Castle, A'ilie, and Forest should form part of the dower of his son's affianced bride, Isabelle. At that time the value of the Castle and manor of Rockingham, with the forest from " Oxendon to Stamford," was only estimated at £80. Nothing of interest is left on record relating to Rockingham Castle during the reign of Edward II. That feeble and pleasure loving prince appeals to have visited it twice during 1315, the year succeeding the murder of his favourite, Gaveston ; and 1 The loyal viKits to Rockingham in 1279, 1290, nnrt 1300 are given on the suthority of the Rev. C. H. Hartshorn, who was at the i)aiu8 to draw up an itinerary of King Edwiird I. 14 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. once in April, 1323, four years before his own feai'ful death. It was probably owing to what he saw at his last visit that he issued ipstructions for fortifying the Castle and furnishing it with provisions and ai'iiis. How lax was his rule, and how little attention was paid to his orders, may be seen from a letter of Archbishop Melton to Robert de Woodhouse, three years afterwards, in which he says that, in a letter he had just received from the king, reference is made to the king's having given such instructions, but "quod quidem breve nunquam vidimus nec ejus intelleximus tenorem."^ The names of five constables occur during this reign, and a good deal of disafforesting went on. The Abbot of Peterborough and some others were allowed to enclose portions of the forest, and to " empark." The Friday market at Rockingham, which had been gi-anted by Henry III. to Edward, Earl of Cornwall in 1271, was in 1315 changed to Saturday. Edward III. appears to have used this Castle not only as a pleasure resort but also as a place for the transaction of important state business, and as a stage in his journoyings np and down his kingdom. Thus in 1334, during a lull in his Scottish enterprises, he came here at Easter-tide, on Friday, 25th March, and remained until the 5th April. On Saturday, the day after his arrival, he was occupied in state affairs, and attested four documents. On Easter Sunday, 27th March, by royal command, Simon de Eye, Abbot of Ramsey, pi'eaclied before him in the chapel at Rockingham, an event of which the chronicler of that abbey seems to have been not a little proud. He says : " Item hoc anno ex precepto Regis idem Abbas celebravit missam regis in capella sua apud Rokyngham in die Paschae et ibidem piaedicavit laudabiliter y ^ Easter Monday and Tuesday he devoted to leisure, and possibly to pleasure. On Wednesday, the 30th, he was again busy with affairs of state, and attested no less than six documents of importance, and on the last day of the month two more, and on Friday, 1st April, one. From that day to the following Tuesday, there is no ti'acc of him, but as on the 5th he put his name to another document at Rockingham, he had probably been enjoying himself in the forest and neighbourhood. This is the longest sojourn at Rockingham of any king of which we possess a record. He came here the 9th December, the year before his great French campaign, and again on 28th August, 1354, the year preceding his renewal of the war with France. His last recorded visit was on the 24th August, 1375, in the midst of his trovibles, and he then signed here the truce which had been concluded at Bruges. ^ The names of five constables are found during this reign, and in 1347 two Scotch 1 Letters from Northern Registers, p. 331. 2 Chronicon Abbatiae Ramseiensis, p. 352. 3 Rymer's Foedera. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 15 prisoners (not unlikely from amongst those captured at Neville's Cross the previous year) were sent from the Tower of London to this Castle. This is the last record yet recovered of an English monarch visiting Rockingham Castle while it remained absolutely in the possession of the crown. When in later times the sovereign came here, he came as a guest. After this time we simply find occasional notices of repairs, and from them we learn that from the year 1381 to the year 1385 between three and four hundred pounds were spent on repairs ; and judging from the interesting list of items included in this ex|)enditure, the doors and windows must have been in a very dilapidated condition. Nearly every fastening required renewal, even the vessels of every day use, as the bucket for drawing water, the royal " forkes and stoups," had fallen into decay. A convincing proof that tlie Castle had been neglected by the king. No records connected with the Castle during the reigns of Henry IV. and V. seem to have been discovered, .lud the only notice of it during the reigns of the six succeeding kings, from 1399 to 1485, nearly a centixry, is that the vineyard still existed, and was worth four shillings per annum. Robert de Ross was appointed constable in 1442. The Castle was granted to Margaret, queen of Henry VI., and afterwards taken from her by Edward IV., and settled upon his own queen, Elizabeth. In 1475 a new constable appeared upon the scene for a very brief period, the unfortunate William, Lord Hastings. It is most probable that this Castle loas utilized by one or both parties during the veiy im{)erfectly recorded struggle between the two rival houses, although no evidence to that effect has been found. On the accession of the Tudors there were symptoms of the Castle coming again into royal favour, for immediately after he assumed the crown, Henry VII. granted to his uncle, " .lohn Wells, Viscount Wells, the office of constable of the Castle, steward of the Castle, lordship and manor, and master of the game of Rockingham, &c. ; and appointments were also made to the rangership of the several bailywicks of the forest. At the same time a " New Park " was enclosed on the south and west of the Castle demesnes, and the Castle having become too dilapidated for the royal use, a lodge was erected in the New Park for the accommodation of the sovei'eign when hunting in that part of the forest. On 21st September, 1485, Henry VII. granted to Sir William Stokke, knight, the office of " Keeper of the New Park at Rockingham for life." ^ This lodge iii mentioned in coimection with the few royal visits paid to Rockingham during the century and a half following its erection, and it appears to have been 1 Materials for the History of the Reign of Henry VII., vol. 1, p. 26. 16 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. much used by the Watsons afterwards. Traces of it are still visible to the righh of the drive through the park to Cottingham, where, amongst a plantation of trees, the situation of the moat which surrounded it is clearly discei'nable. The New Park, under the care of its successive owners, has become one of the most lovely parks in Northamptonshire. The renewal of interest in the Castle and Forest seems to have extended into the next reign, for Henry VIII., besides making several appointments to the rangership, &c. in 1523 granted to Sir William Parr "the keepership of Rockingham Castle, and other offices connected therewith."^ And in 15.30 the King appointed Sir Richard Sacheverall and Sir William Pitzwilliam to be Justices in Byre (see chapter 7). They, amongst other duties, had the following rather startling ones to attend to, " widows marrying without licence to be fined, and to make obligation " (that is to give a bond that " they wouldn't do it again.") " Widows sueing to marry to pay a fine," which fines were to be paid to the justices in Eyre. ^ This grotesque union of duties in the same office to guard the safety of " The King's Majesty's wild beastes," and to keep an eye upon widows matrimonially inclined, would perhaps seem still more ludicrous to us were we not accustomed to as great an incongruity in the title of our own court of "Probate Divorce, and Admiralty.'" Evidence is furnished us of the total disorganization of govei"nment, consequent upon the long internecine war, which had desolated England, by the fact that Henry VII. found that the fees, or castle-guard rents for the Manors of Weston, Sutton, Dingley, and part of Blathe-Wyk, had been unlawfully withheld, and that the Castle tenants at Rockingham were enormously in arrears, and he issued peremptory orders to the sheriif to compel payment of all the dues to Lord Wells. Notwithstanding this seeming revival of interest in the Castle, the Tudors appear to have taken no care for the repair of it. Henry VIII. 's brother-in-law, his " fidelity," Lord Parr, did not reside in it, and the building was allowed to fall into that ruinous condition in which it was seen and described by Leland, somewhere between 1533 and 1540, just when a yotith, who was destined to rescue the castle from total destruction, had come into possession of a manor in Rockingham, bequeathed to him by his father. In all probability this, like so many of our fine old castles and abbeys, would have served the purpose of a handy quarry, whence the materials for building the substantial dwellings, then springing up on every side, could be obtained at little cost, had it not been rescued from that fate by circumstances to be narrated in the following chapter. As it is, there are few inhabited ' castles in England which retain so much of the ancient fabric as this does. Compared to it, in this respect, Windsor Castle is an infant. 1 Ca!. of Letters, Henry VIII., vol. 4, p. 3073. 2 Letters Henry VIII., vol. 4, p. 3073. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 17 An account of the restorations necessary to render it again habitable will be found under the lives of the successive owners, and the reader will thus be enabled to trace the growth of the Rockingham Castle of to-day, of which he will find, in chapter six, a description written by one who, knowing every part of it most intimately, has been able to furnish not only a guide to assist the visitor to discover the principle points of interest, but also to enable him to form a mental picture of the old Castle, when, in all its glory, it was inhabited by the sovereign and his court. Chapter Second. THREE EDWARDS Armiger hie situs est Edwardus Watson hononis Justiciae cultor, arteq : Causidicus. Hunc Lincolnice liabuit praesul dignissimna olim Scribam, et causarum hunc legit ad ofRcium. Ferre inopi auxiliiim, longas componere lites, Consilio prom.ptuf! quosq : juvare fuit. Quid memorcm dotes anirni ? quid munera Fortis ? In Patriam clarum quid pietatis opus ? Parce virum conjux proles ter quina parentem, Parce precox- lacrimis solicitare tuum. Ingenium, Mores, Virtus et Fama, Fidesq : Nunc illi ad superos concomitantur Iter. (Epitaph in the Chancel of S. Andrew's Church, Long Lyddirigton, Rutland.) HERE are families whose history may be compared to the course of a river like the Thames, which, rising in a humble and obscure spring-, flows as a modest brook, until gradually augmented in its course by the influx of othei- rivulets, it becomes an important river. There are other ^ .. families whose histoiy rather re- ^pgr^ sembles the Nile, which, issuing from a lake, is an important I'iver fi'om the first. The family of the Watsons of Rockingham Castle belongs to the latter class. Just within the southern boundary of the county of Rutland, and nestling amongst ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 19 some small hills, lies the fossilized Tudor village of Long Lyddington : a sort of miniature Herculanetim of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, a perfect treasure for the archiBologist and the antiquary. As he enters the long straggling street of this village at its southern end, the first object which attracts the traveller is a curious octagonal tower, like a watch-tower^ projecting into the roadway. ^ A nearer view shews this to be a portion of a system of fortifications that once surrounded the bishop's palace, the fine remains of which are seen abutting upon the chui'chyard. The combined view of the palace and the church, with its massive tower and insignificant spire, is very fine. ^ This palace was for centuries, according to Lcland, "The Aunciente Manor-place" of the Bishops of Lincoln, and continued to belong to them i;ntil the reign of Edwai'd VI., when Henry Holbeth, the then bishop, yielded it to the king, who gave it first to his aunt, the Lady Cromwell, and afterwards to William Cecil, Lord Birleigh, who coiivei'ted part of it into a hospital foi' a warden, twelve poor men, and two women, and called it Je.sus' Hospital. " In the Hall of which Hospital, being a fair chamber, and (as reported) part of the Bishop's own Lodgings hci'etofore, is still to be seen in the windows in gi'eat capital letters, Dominus exaltatio mca ; and in almost every quarry, Delectare in Domino." ^ This quaint and beautiful building will well repay a visit from the members of an archaeological society, and so will the fine old church, Avith its many points of interest, amongst which may be noticed the unusual arrangement of the altar, which stands on a kind of raised dais, I'ailcd all round in such a manner that communicants are able to api^roach it on any of the four sides. On a slab in the floor of the chancel, jnst below the altar steps, is to be seen a brass tablet beai-ing the efiigics of a man and woman, and of apparently five sons and five daughters, with the Latin epitaph which is j)laced as a motto to this chapter. This brass marks the resting place of Edwaed Watson of Lyddington, and of Emma Smith his wife. Two centuries ago the following inscription surrounded the tablet : " Of your Charity praye for the soule of Mr. Edwai-d Watson, Esqr., Justice of Peace, and ' Surveyor General ' to three Reverend Fathers in God, that is to say, to my Lord William Smith, to my Lord William Attwater, to my Lord John liongland, late successively beying Bishops of Lincoln. Wliich Edward deceased the X day of October, the year of oui- Lord MV*^ XXX., on whose soule and on the soule of Mistress Emma his wife Jcsu have Mercy." The brass bearing this inscription has been torn away, and the mai-k of its original 1 Sec initial letter of this cliiipter. 2 See tail-piece to this chni)ter. 3 Wriffht's Rutlnna. 20 ROCKTNGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. place alone remains, but the inscription lias been preserved in James Wright's history of Rutland (London, 1684), and copied from him by Nichols, in his history of Leicestershire, under " Garthorp." The family of this Edward Watson was of considerable antiquity, and had occupied a prominent position in the counties of Cambridge and Huntingdon long before his time. ^ We learn from his will that he himself was born at Sledmer, in Yorkshire ; 2 and he appears to have attained to a position of great wealth and influence. His large possessions were partly inherited from various family connections, and were partly the result of his own labours. Most of his possessions in Lyddington, which were considerable, were derived from an ancestor, probably his father, who was living there in 1460. The manor of Garthorp and some other property in Leicester he inherited from his uncle, Lewis Watson.'' Extensive possessions in Great Gidding, &c., in Huntingdonshire, appear to have been in the family for several generations. Amongst the Rockingham Papers are found numerous most interesting rolls of courts held at Great Gidding for the Watsons as far back as the reign of Henry VI. But doubtle.ss a good deal of his wealth, and certainly of his influence, was gained by his marriage with Emma Smith, daughter and coheir of Anthony .Smith, Esq., a brother of William Smith, Bishop of Lincoln. We may be sure that the Bishop, who was a great favourite of Henry VII., would use his court influence on behalf of his niece's husband. And the enormous extent of the diocese over which he ruled must have furnished him with abundant opportunities of enriching his Surveyor General. At the time of his death, Edward Watson of Lyddington held leases of, at least, half a dozen parsonages, besides leases of several " Lordships, Lands, and Tenements," and was lord of some fourteen manors. From him issued, in the full tide of prosperity, like a river from a lake, the family of the Watsons of Rockingham Castle. The actual number of the children of this Edward Watson and of his wife, Emma Smith, is involved in some obscurity. According to his monumental brass, and the few references made to the subject by genealogists (who probably derived their information from his tomb), he had fifteen children. But in his will, dated three months before his death, he names only seven children living, and another one expected, who is made the subject of several hypothetical provisions. ^ If, therefore, his wife did bear him fifteen children, seven of them must have pi-e-deceased their father. 1 Collins. 2 See Note A, will of Edward Watson of Lyddington and " Note^to the Pedigree of the Watsons." 3 Nichols. 4 See Note B, The Three yuocessive Bishops of Lincoln. 5 Note A. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 21 His eldest son, Henry, appeai-s to have puzzled the genealogists. Nichols dismisses him thus : " Leaving Henry Watson, his son, a minor, fifteen years old. Edward Watson, Esq., who married &c., . . . was the next possessor of this manor" (Gaithorp). Collins boldly ignores him, and says : " He (Edward Watson of Lyddington), had fifteen children, and was succeeded by his eldest son Edward Watson Esq." And one or other of these statements has been followed by later writers. The fact, as gathered from his will, is that, for some reason he had placed this son Henry in a religious house, and according to the custom of those times, he simply refers to him in his will in the following terms : " Item I beqaetlie nnto Henrye Watsonne my soune at Newstede XX£, and will that he have no moore of my goodes and landes." This reads like a cruel act, and akin to the modern angry father's cutting ofE an oifending son with a shilling; but when religious houses flourished, and served as quiet homes for some of the highest in the land, it was the usual custom for a testator to state expressly that those of his children who " cntei'ed into religion " were to receive a smaller portion than those who did not, and to leave a donation to the house into which such child should enter. We see therefore that the amount he bequeathed to his eldest son was really handsome. Why he placed him in a religious hou.se at all we are, of coui'.se, left to conjecture. Henry may have shewn strong proclivities towards a monastic life, or possibly he may have shewn no capacity, no proclivities in any direction, and his father may therefore have thought him safer in a monastery, and his extensive possessions safer in the hands of his second son, Edward. However this may have been, the elder son is henceforth lost to view. An account of his second son, Edward, heir aid successor, will be found below. His third son, Kenelm, on the death of his mother, inherited the Lyddington and other Rutland property. By his will, dated the last of December, 1597. and proved 10th April, 1598, he gave his eldest son, Anthony Watson, ^ everything, " onlie six hundred pound in a bagge ensealed and delivered to Ursula Watson, my daughter, and five hundred pounds in an other bagge ensealed and delivered by me to Kenelm Watson my younger son." Anthony, who was left sole executor, was to distribute £20 in charity. Ursula was to have also "one bedde with all the furniture." It is highly probable that from these two sons of Kenelm are descended many of the numerous families of Watson, found in different parts of England, who use the same arms as the Rockingham Watsons. Unluckily the wonderful old parish register of Lyddington gives no assistance towards the solution of this question. The early pages are so injured by damp, and two leaves at the beginning are so mutilated, that 1 This Anthony Watson mnrned Elizabeth, daughter of Thomas Andrews, of Charwelton. 22 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. althougli the name of Watson frequently occurs there, nothing can be made out with certainty during this important period. The earliest recognisable date in it is 1563. Ursula Watson remained unmarried, and appears to have led a life of active piety, making a good use of her wealth. She assisted her poor neighbours by lending them small sums of money to help them at a pinch, and in her will she directs that Goodman Edmunds, and three others of that name are to keep the £6 they had borrowed, and Richard Borrow (good name !) was to retain the £7 he had borrowed, aLso " Goodwief Price " was to keep the £3 her husband had borrowed, and one " Wenefride " was to keep the 30/- which Edward Ireland had borrowed. Altogether the debts owing to her are thus stated, " Summa totale fEower hundred Thirtie and Two pounds per me Robertus Rudd scriptor." She provided for the continuance of this admirable system of helping the poor, by lending instead of giving, in the following quaint bequest. Out of certain property willed for that purpose " My brother Anthony and Master Rudde, minister of Liddington, shall lend fourth yearly" (without interest) "to ffyve of the poorest couples in Liddington ffyve pounds (20/- to each couple) putting in good security for repayment at the end of 12 months. This to be done so long as my brother and Master Rudde shall live, then by their assigns for ever so long as the world endureth." To Master Rudd she gave £3 and her bible, to each of her god- children 10/-, "except Goodwiefe Walls her child," she is to keep the 40/- she has, and use it "for her child's good." Her brother, Anthony, had seven score pounds, and Keuelm, her " estate of land in Eson." Amongst numerous other bequests made by this sensible woman, ai'e the following, which may interest some lady readers. Her maid, Grace, was to have £5 and her " workaday gown." Her " bulfin gown " was to go to Dorothy ffowler. Mistress Mary Andrewes was to have " one of my rufE bands and a head tue of the best." Aprons of holland were to be given to four widows she names, while " Johan Browne, als Goodier of Tansworth, " was to have one of my best smockes," and to Barbara ffreeman " my straight bodied petticote." May not many of these articles of dress have been objects of envy to her fair neighbours during the wearer's life ? She provides that " Nurse Haccut shall be contented for watching with me." Her brothers were to share her two bracelets, Kenelra was to have a gold ring and chain, and her sister, Watson (no doubt Anthony's wife), her " Tablet " and her " Carker," and ten pounds in money. She did not forget the church in which she had doubtless been a devout worshipper, but left 20/- " towards the makeing of a cawsey between the church gates and the church porch." These three, Henry, Edward, and Kenelm, are the only sons named in Edward Watson's will. The daughters are Barbara, Mary, Bridget, and Susan. Of these it is known that Mary married Thomas Dudley, of Clopton, in Northampton- shire, and thus came about one of those instances of double alliance which occur ROCKINGHAM CASTLPJ AND THE WATSONS. 23 so frequently in this family. The Dudley.s, who appear to have been very wealthy, were descended from a Staffordshire famil}'-, and settled in Barnwell and Clopton towards the end of the fifteenth century. Agnes, the sister of the great grand- father of Mary Watson's husband married Thomas Montagu of Hemington, and their granddaughter, Dorothy Montagu of Boughton, married Mary Watson's brother, Edward. In other words this Mary Watson's husband was second cousin once removed to her brother Edward's wife. Edward Dudley, the great grandson of Thomas Dudley and Maiy Watson, married Catherine, a daughter of Sir Christopher Hatton. As Edward Watson of Rockingham refers in his will to his sister, " Bridget Ellyott," the third daughter evidently married, and was living the 20th October, 1578. No reference can be found to either of the other daughters, or to the child whose birth had been so much looked forward to by the father. The character of Edward Watson of Lyddington is no doubt fairly presented to us in his epitaph. The words italicized mark a trait which has more or less distinguished cdl his successors. Indeed, a generation or two back, the spirit of unbounded liberality, and the generous impulse to help others assumed in the family almost the form of a disease, and seriously impaired the estates. We maj' therefore feel certain that the founder of the family was " Ferre inopi auxilium promptus." Robert Kirton, the fifth mitred Abbot of Peterborough, in a document dated loth March, 1520, conveys the thanks of himself, and of the chapter of his abbey to that "Venerabili viro Edwardo Watson generoso " for some special act of liberality he he had shewn towards their abbey. ^ And in the gi'ant of arms to him, dated 17th October, 1519, it is stated that : " Non pas seulement par co'mune renommee maiz aussi par le rapport et tesrnoignage de plusieurs nobles ho'mes digues de foy (nous) so'mes pour vray aduertiz et infourmez que Edwarde Watson de lidyngton en la conte de Rutland gentil ho'mo a loiiguement ponrsuy les faitz de vertu et tant en ce que aultres ses affaii'es sest ])orte vertueusement et honoi'ableme t gonueriie tellement quil a bien deseruy et est digne que doresenauant p'petuellement luy et sa posterite so^'ent ea toutes places honorables admiz renomez comptez nombrez et receupz ou nombfey et en la compagnie des autres anciens gentilz et nobles hommes." The arms granted to him were : Ar. on a chev. engr., az. between three martlets sa. as many crescents or. each charged with a torteau. ^ In the absence of any known portrait of him, Ave arc left to conjecture what his pei'sonal appearance may have Ihmmi. His constitution must have been excellent, or he could not so long have borne the long journeys on horseback, which the great 1 Bnckinnrhnm Papers. 2 See note to Pedigree of the Watsons. 24 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. extent of the diocese over whicli he was surveyor necessitated, and traces of which are seen in the large number of hack horses he possessed. The following extract from a letter from John Longland, Bishop of Lincoln, to Cardinal Wolsey, written at Lyddington, 30th September, 1528, well illustrates the perils the diocesan ofEcials had to encounter. Where the chancellor was not spared it is not likely the surveyor would be spared : " I have both written and sent to the Prior of Spalding by my Chancellor . . for the loaters in the Fens are now great and dangerous.''^ We get a slight glimpse of him in a letter from Richard Croke (" John of Flanders," the celebrated Greek scholar, who taught Greek to Henry VIII.) It is dated 1525, and is addressed to Gold. In it he says : " By great good luck met in London Watson, ' tristi vultu et ferme jam omnibus fabulae habito ' " The following extract from another letter of Croke's, dated about the same time, shews that the rather numerous family of Smiths, with which the diocesan surveyor was matrimonially allied, contained at least one somewhat objectionable member. "After I left I could not forbear visiting the master of my college in order to understand the lies Smith had been telling. . . . However muc;h I have been maligned to the bishop to whom I owe so much, I have resolved to bear it all with equanimity. I have always been really friendly to Smith, but he is a false friend or an active enemy, for he has traduced me to the bishop. What could have been worse than when I had, according to his advice, opened the way to the favour of the Bishop of Lincoln, than to have acted contrary to all his previous engagements ? " He then goes on to complain of the " ill services Smith has done him with Watson." Although Edward Watson's principle residence was at Lyddington, he had a manor house at " Much Gidding," in Huntingdonshire, and another at Garthorp, in Leicestershire, and a " town house " as well, at which he frequently resided Not a trace, not a tradition of his house at Lyddington now remains. It stuod probably on the left hand, about half way up the village, whei'e is a long wall, topped with a very old coping of stone, and which is said once to have surrounded the grounds of "the Hall." Od the 10th day of October, 1530, the day on which he added the codicil to his will, and just one month before the death of the great fallen cardinal, died Edward Watson of Lyddington, honoured and respected by some of the greatest men of his time, leaving all his children apparently in their nonage. We know at any rate that it would be some time before his son Edward would have occasion to use the " two best shaving clothes " bequeathed to him. He must have been well advanced in years when he married Emma Smith. How long she survived him is not known. His affection for her is shewn in the terms in which he refers to her in his will. And the confidence he reposed in her Edward Watkox, cir. 1552. Page 30. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 25 judgment is seen by his leaving so much to her absolute decision. His executors were his wife, his cousin, Miles Perkyns of Landon (his brother-in-law;, Henry Sapcott, and Sir Laurance Hogeson, vicar of Lyddington ; with " Maister Doctur Payne and Thomas AValdrum gent to be Sup'uisors." Having thus placed before the reader all the particulars respecting the life of the founder of this family that can be gathered from documents at present available, I will proceed to an account of his son and successor, Edward Watson, Esq., of Rockingham Castle, who may be regarded as the Jacob of his family, for, like that patriarch, he not only supplanted his brother, but he also added greatly to the family wealth and influence, and in a similar manner, i.e. by a judicious marriage. One of his earliest acts, on attaining his majority, was to form an alliance with Sir Edward Montagu of Boughton, the great Chief Justice of England, by marrying his eldest daughtei', Dorothy (or Dowse). He thus secured the countenance and support of one of the most influential men in the court of Henry VIII. But he seems to have had another equally influential, if less conspicuous, friend at that court. If the reader will refer to the will of Edward Watson of Lyddington (Note A), he will find mention made more than once of Thomas Webster, one of his clerks, who also witnessed the will. At the Record Office is preserved the following letter, mutilated and injured by damp : "(Tho) mas Webster to . . . (Cromwell) . was asked by Master Covert to go with young Master Watson to his place, about which I desire to know your Mastership's pleasure. Yet on my knees I implore you to be a good master unto my (n o)wlde master, Mr. Watson, his children : for if the young man be acc ... is warde to the Kynges grace, thre of his sisters be utterly undooii. His land is held to the performance of Mr. Watson's will, by which each of the daughters should have £100, and two of the sons £200, besides other bequests. The child offers himself of his own motion to give himself, body, goods, and lands to your goodness, and hopes you will accept him as your servant to go to the temporal law." The writer goes on to complain that " when in the country by your Mastei'ship's commandment Mr. Swillington's servants, with their master's approbation called him heritic and spoke shameful words of him, as if he had been a heathen and not your Mastership's servant, and provoked him to fight with daggers and swords di'awn in Swillington's own house. No one in the country loves him, not even his own servants : h(owbeit) . . . d fauch so, by your mastershipp contrary, I think your ... be afrayed on him, and he I'eports your Mastershipp . . . Crumwell." From this we see that at least one old sei'vant was found faithful to his young 26 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. master, and that this humble clerk possessed some influence with the now all powerful Thomas Cromwell. Is it too much to suppose that the clerk to the Surveyor General had in earlier days come into contact, and even formed an intimacy with Cromwell, when the latter was himself in the humble position of a clerk ? It is evident from the latter part of the letter that Thomas Webster had, like Cromwell, to a certain extent adopted the tenets of the Reformation, and was employed by the king's secretary upon some service. At any rate his letter bore fruit, and Cromwell wrote to Henry Sapcote desiring him " to come up to him with all convenient celerity as he is executor of Edward Watson deceased who is in danger to the king." Matters seem to have been satisfactorily arranged, and the young heir to have passed into the guardianship of Cromwell, for the following letter (also preserved in the Record Office), written in a bold, distinct hand, shews that with him rested the decision of a most important event in the life of young Edward Watson : " Right honoi^abuil and my singular good master I hartely recom'end me unto yow yowr s'uant mast' Watson and my doughter doo lyke eche other well and if it please yow to be contente I intend to have them maryd before the feast of all Sayntes next com'yng or shortly after and as for your monaye is redy and if I liadd byn suer of yo' being at London I would have wayted upon you my selff And iff your pleasure be to have the monaye before thys terme begyun after ye feaste of all sayntz I wyll wayte upon you my selff at suche daye and place as you shall appoynte and not ffayle And what your pleasure is herein it may please yow that I may be aduertesyd by thys berer beseachyng yow to contynew good master to me and to hym and of owr s'uice yow shalbe assuryd to the best of my powre by the grace off J'hu who p's'ue yow in honor. At Bougliton the Second daye of October^ by yowr assuryd and at yr commandment. Ed. Mountagu. To the Right Honorabull Master Crumwell Secretary to the Kings Maiesty thys be de." The singularity of the learned Chief Justice's English is attributable to the fact that Latin was still the language of the educated classes. A full account of this branch of the great family of Montagu will be found in the author's book on " The Montagus of Boughton." It will be sufficient here to state that, on her father's side, the bride was descended from King Edward I. In the gallery at Rockingham Castle are portraits of the Chief Justice Montagu, and of his daughter. Dowse, ascribed to Zuchei'o. The young lady is represented as rather hard-featured, and the impression gathered from her portrait is that she had a strong will, and was ^^hysically capable of enforcing it. 1 There is no yenr, but the authorities of the Record Office have assigned this letter to 2nd October, 1536. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 27 It was probably through the Montagu influence that Edward Watson obtained from the crown an easy lease of the Castle and Park at Rockingham, in which parish his father had bequeathed him a certain Manor, lands, and tenements. The first grant to be traced was made in the first and second years of Philip and Mary, two years before the death of Chief Justice Montagu. It included the keepership of Corby Woods, and was the commencement of that long period of authority which this family wielded over that portion of the extensive Forest of Rockingham known as " Rockingham Baylywick." At the expiration of this lease Queen Elizabeth granted a lease of the same possessions to the " Ladie Dorothy Stafford, widow, one of her Masties Privie Chaumber," for the sum of £4 annually, " with the right to tak and kill Six Bucks and six Dooes, and them to give or dispose by her or their discretion to tlie Inliabytants neare the Parke and Woodes aforesaid for the better preservation of her Mastie's Deere and Wilde beasts." Six days afterwards Lady Stafford assigned her lease, in consideration of a certain lump sum of money, to William Neale, Esq., of London, who, twenty- five days later, assigned the lease to Edward Watson, who was thus again established for a period of thirty years at Rockingliam. It is interesting to note that, in one of the witnesses to tliis assignment we are first introduced to the learned Dupup, who seems to have been a secretary, or man of law, connected with two generations of Watsons, for his name appears as the writer of many documents, I'emarkable for the free and easy style of orthography adopted by him. ^ Edward Watson seems to have led the life of an active country gentleman, and to have been very diligent in the management and supervision of his estates. In the early part of his connection with Rockingham there is no doubt he resided in the Lodge, in the New Park. But fortunately for his posterit}', and for archajology, he seems early to have discerned the capabilities of the old ruin, and one of his first cares, on securing his lease of the royal demesne, was to make the Castle inhabitable. He repaired, and evidently where necessary, rebuilt those portions which now form the large hall, and the dining room (or smaller hall). According to G. T. Clark's admirable paper on Rockingham Castle, he found the walls of this part of the Castle standing, as also the fine gate towers, and the massive curtain wall extending southwards to the ruins of the keep. He divided the hall as we now see it, and added chambers above. The date on the beam of the ceiling shews that this portion of the restoration was completed in 1579, the year after he made his will, and the sentence he has inscribed on those beams exhibits the spirit of 1 The Rockinslinm Pnpers. 28 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. devout reliance upon Providence in which he set about building up his house and family. ^ His share in the restoration of the Castle terminated in the j^ear of his death, with the completion of the newer portion, now forming that part between the hall and the curtain wall, including the housekeeper's room, &c. Thus to him is due the finest front of the modern building. 2 By Royal licence he, in 1578, fenced in with rails 30 acres of park "for hay for the Deere." ^ The latter half of the sixteenth centary is conspicuous in the history of the domestic architectux-e of Northamptonshire. As we have seen, the i-estoration of Rockingham Castle was begun about the middle of that century, at the same time Sir Edward Griffin was building Dingley Hall. And towards the time of the completion of Edward Watson's share in the restoration of Rockingham Castle Sir T. Tresham commenced his additions to Rushton Hall, and began to build his Market House at Rothwell ; also Kirby Hall was completed. By judicious sales he was enabled to purchase property which considerably augmented the family revenues, especially in the next two generations. He sold the manor, &c., of Dingley, and possessions he had in Brampton Ash to Sir Edward Griffin, and purchased the advowsons of Kettering, Stoke, and Wilbarston, and the manor of Rockingham, and Sandgate Castle in Kent. He also added largely, by purchases, to his property in Great Gidding and Garthorp. Up to this period the manors and rich lands of Stoke and Wilbarston, which now form a no inconsiderable item in the Rockingham pioperty, had been in the possession of the Earls of Rutland (Manners), to whom they had descended, by marriage, from the de Rooses, of whom we shall have to speak in a future chapter. But in 1554 they were purchased of the Earl of Rutland by Sir Edward Griffin, and this purchase paved the way for their transfer, at a, later date, to the Watsons, as will be presently shewn. The following is a singular instance of Edward Watson's energy, and of his promptitude in business transactions. On the 2nd April, 1567, while riding over his estate, a letter was brought to him from a_ Mr. Smally, of Holt, giving him notice of the day fixed by the sheriff of Leicestei'shire for the hearing of a dispute about some cattle impounded at Garthorp. He immediately wrote the following characteristic note at the bottom of the letter, and forwarded it to his man of business at Garthorp. " To my loving friend Mr. Whiting at Garthorp. '*Mr. Whyting, regarde you well of thes contents, and as I gave you myne 1 See Chapter 6. 2 See tail piecs to this chapter. 3 Rockingham Papers. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 29 advice at Rockingham doo accordingly. Kepe the Days above written, and cawse declaration to be made, as of a frehulde whereby that courte shall holde no longer or further plea, and bring nie a true copye of yr p'cedings you told me you had declared, but it seemyth not so, wch mouid me thence to will you bringe a copie of the avvnswer ; be well advised and let the declarac"on in eny wise be substantyally hand wuh shuld have bene i-eily done to yr hand apon instructions, if you had not mysenformed me. " Yr L. freend E. Watson." " for hast I was constrayned to wryte thes fewe lynes of horseback." ^ The writing in this note is perfectly steady and even throughout, and the signature shews the rudiments of that wonderful terminal flourish afterwards brought to such perfection by the writer's son, E J ward. We have known a modern bishop sketch the outlines of his charge while travelling in an easy first-class railway carriage, btit it may be doubted whether the readiest scribe on the Episcopal Bench could write a letter " of horseback." To be a good rider was an absolute necessity for an English country gentleman in those days. It' his estates lay scattered in different counties, and he wished to pass from one to another, he had the choice between i-iding or walking. Carriages were not, — and roads were not, — in the sense in which we understand roads and carriages. Every country gentleman's house, therefore, had a well stocked stable attached to it, and in old inventories, the value of the contents of the stable often exceeded that of some of the principal apartments of the mansion itself. Edward Watson adopted the motto " Patience is a cure for every trouble," and he appears to have needed whatever consolation he could derive from it, for, notwith- standing his active habits, and the immense quantity of outdoor exercise he took, he seems to have had either some secret trouble, or to have been afflicted with a constitutional melancholy, which caused a vein of sadness to appear throughout his life. Amongst the manuscript collections of the late Lord Montagu, at Ditton Pai-k, is a copy of a letter, in which Sir Henry Percy (who was under the conimand of the Duke of Norfolk in his expedition into Scotland, cir., 1.560), gives an interesting account of that expedition, and a list of offi^-ers in the Duke's Armj'. This copy was made by Edward Watson, and sent to his brother-in-law, Sir Edward Montagu, of Boughton, ac(;ompanied by a letter which shews him in a more cheerful mood. He jocularly begins " Mr. Shcrif ^ ye shall understand that the comyssion for the Lewten'cy ys co . (me ?) downe where the old Lewtenant remayne and you nowe 1 Rockingham Papei'S. 2 Sir Edward Montagu was Slieriff of Northamptoiisliire 13 of Elizaljeth. 30 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. are one (in the com'ission) , but ye shall have sutch a pass of wk (work ?) in hande as in my tyme the lyke never was in this shyre. ******* " Your Louing brothr. Ed. Watson." In the drawing room at Rockingham Castle, is a very fine portrait, ascribed to Holbein, on which is the following inscription — " Cvivis - Dolori - Remedium - Paciencia. A. Dni 1552. Secundum Forma - et Habitum Aetatis Suae XXXIII." It represents a rather tall, thiia gentleman, with a handsome, grave and meditative cast of features. He wears a flat cap, and is dressed in the costume of Henry VIII. 's or Edward VI. 's time — which gives him the appearance of a student. Near him are several books, and from one in his right hand depends a letter shewing the address :— " To my Loving friend Mr. Watson." This is reputed to be the earliest known portrait of Edward Watson, Esq., of Rockingham Castle. At the top of the front staircase is the portrait of a gentleman in the posture of prayer, on which is the insciiption : — " Cvivis Dolori Remediv — Patiencia Vera effigies Edwardi Watsoni Armiger in hunc Modu depicta, Genibus flexis inter preces. Aetatis suae quinquagesimo sexto, et Ao. Di. 1567." Now if the fifteen years between the dates of these two portraits be added to the age of the subject of the earlier of them, they will make him to have been 48 years old in 1567. Either, therefore, the two portraits do not represent the same individual, or there is an error in the dates. Over the doorway in the Long Gallery is a portrait representing a stout gentle- man with a white beard. On this portrait is " Aet 67." In the old inventories this is referred to as a portrait of " Edward Watson, Esq., aged 67." But he whose life we are now considei^ing, and his father at Lyddington, were the only Edward Watsons who were Esquires at the age of 67, and it is difficult to imagine that the Ed. Watson represented in the portrait of 1567 in the attitude of prayer could, in eleven years, have developed into the figare represented in the gallery portrait. The difficulty therefore of fixing upon either of these portraits as giving an idea of his personal appearance is very great. In each of them there is to be seen more or less of the " Tristi Vultu " noticed by Croke as marking the father's features. ^ 1 The writer is disposed to think there is an error in the dates, and that these three portraits are representations of Edward Watson, of Rockingham, as he appeared at three periods of his life. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 31 In the codicil to his will he explains the omission of certain items by a reference to the " gfievous troubles and suffeiings " which had caused him to forget them. What his trouble was cannot now be known. His life covered what, to a thoughtful and conscientious man, must have been one of the most agitating periods of English History. Daring his minority he witnessed the dissolution of all the monasteries, Ac, which his father had charitably remembered in his will. He lived through all the various changes of doctrine which agitated the Church from the deposition of Wolsey to the time of his own death. Few high-minded men could have witnessed the havoc made amongst the fine old Abbeys — Fineshade, Pipwell, Ramsey, &c. (with all of which he must have had more or less intimate relations), without experiencing a considerable shock. His will, written by the phonetic Edward Dupup, is dated 20th October, 1578. The copy in Somer.set House occupies ten very closely written large pages, and commences in a strain of piety similar to that of his father's. Black gowns are to be provided for Sir Ed. Montagu (his brother-in-law), Thos. Brooke, George Lynne (who had married his wife's sister Amy), Thos. ffurthoo, Arthur Brooke, George fflowers, Elizabeth flPui'thoo, Katherin Brooke, Ellyn fflowers, and Anne Watson, and a "gown of black" to each of twelve poor persons in Rockingham. Like his father-in-law, the Chief Justice Montagu, ho forbad the customary distribution of a " common dole " on the day of his burial, but "to every town within the hundred of Corby 10s. to be divided by the Clearke and Churchwardens of each town to the poorest inhabitants, and eveiy poor cottager in the same towns to receive 5s." And 5s. or lO.s. were to be distributed in every town where he had property. He had built in Rockingham " a house for the residence and relief of foui- poor lame and ympotent persons," for the support of which house he left a rent-charge of .£8 per an. on his manor of Cotton." ^ To his servant Christopher Grentham he gives " one parcel of copyhold land in Kettering, which he rents " ; and to several others of his servants he gives small parcels of land for their lives. And to " Christopher Roberts my servaunt and butler, the house at Eston wherein he now dwelleth for the terme of his natural life paying yearly for the same the sum of one penny onely." William Martin, the son of his daughter Mary, was to have an annuity of " fourtie shillings"; and his daughters, " ffurthoo. Brook, fflower, Anne Watson, and Mary Videll " were each to receive " a bason and ewer of sylver each to be worth twenty pounds." For his " good and loveinge wife Dorothie Watson " he provides, " if she live sole, &c., conveniente meate and drinke meete for her estate, and Vacation for herself and for two servaunts, viz., a mayde and a maun with conveniente chamber 1 See Ohap. 4 for the fate of this hospita,!. 32 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. room . . . with all mariner of necessaries of houseliolde stuffe for her and them in my dwelling-house, at Rockingham, with fourty pounds a yeare. Yf she shall happen obstinately or willfully to seek by any othei waye or means to gett, recover or to have any more or furthei- estate . . . then all this my Legacie and devise, shalbe utterly voyde and of none effecte." The reversion of his estates, after the death of his son, was left for the benefit of his seven grand-daughters. But if a brother should be born to them, then the estates were to devolve upon him, with provision for the seven sisters. The Codicil, as mentioned above, states that " grievous sufferings, &c., had caused him to omit, amongst other things, to notice, " That Elizabeth Skynner the wyfe of Johm Skynner dydd by many years serve my sonne Watson and his wyfe in nui'sing and nurishing of dyveis of his children. And whereas also sithence that tyme she hath by the space of ffourteen or ffifteen years s'ved me daylye and contynually as a household servant, leaving (with the consent of her husband), in hope of my good will, the care and oversight of her own things at home, to whome (I take God to record), that I did not gyve her to my remembrance one penny in recompence of her paynes and wages other than sometimes a peticote and sometimes a Coate, beinge so much indebted unto her I cannot and dare not in discharge of my conscience but-p'vide for her some such recompence and consideration as she has deserved." She was, therefore, to have " the howse where she dwelleth " and the " hoi-semylne " which he brought from the Castle to set up there, and an acre of meadow, with three acres of land at Cottingham ''ffrankley and freely to be bestowed upon her wth out anything or rent thereof during her natural life." He was not so forgetful of his scribe as he was of the faithful old nurse, for in his will he says, " I give and bequeath unto my Servaunt Edward Dupup the mesa' or fferme with thappurtenaunces in Rockingham wherein he now dwelleth during the terme of his lyfe wth out any rente payinge therefore. And also one meadow close lying beyonde Rockingham Brydge." The usual gold ring, with a death's head on it, was to be given to each of his executors. Sir Edward Montagu and Sir Thomas Tresham. Wherever he might die he was to be buried in Rockingham Church, and "a /air Monument of Stons" to be erected there within twelve months of his death." Amongst the early entries in the Rockingham parish register is the following: 1584 Edwardus Watson sepultus fuit decimo tertio Maii. Had he lived three months longer he would have welcomed the birth of his grandson, Lewis, destined to become a conspicuous figure in the family. 4 Presumably in " The Lodge, in the New Park." The date of Mrs. Dorothy Wiitson's death has not been ascertaitied. Eii\vAi;ii Watsox, cir. 1567. Vaue 30. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 33 He left one son and six daughters. A preponderance of daughters is observable in almost every generation of this family. The fortunes of the son will be followed presently. The eldest daughter, Catherine, married Arthur Brooke, of Great Oakley, in Northamptonshire, which alliance proved of service to the Watsons during the Civil Wars. This family of Brooke had a common origin with the Brookes, Lords Cobham, in a Cheshire family of that name, and from this alliance is descended the family of the Bx'ookes of Great Oakley, &c. Of the remaining daughters, Mary was married ta Videl, Elizabeth to Thomas ffurtho, of Fortho, in Northamptonshire, and Elleyn to Geo. fflower. The foi'tunes of Anne and Emma have not been traced. Edward Watson, his only son and heir, was, according to genealogists, but thirty- five yeai-s of age when his father died. If so he must have married very j-oung, for in April, 1567, he married Anne Digby, a daughter of Kenelm Digby, of Stoke Dry, in Rutland, and their seven daughters were all born during the life of Edward Watson, the elder. He enjoyed the estates and family honors 32 years, and, as will be seen, the records of his life during that period are full of interest, containing as they do accounts of his active administration of forest and other, now obsolete, laws of the Tudor and early Stuart periods, and thus bringing us into toucli with the daily life of the rural population of the age. By the settlement made on his marriage witli Anne Digby, his father gave him, in possession, the Manor, Ac, of Knipton, in Leicestershire, and in reversion, the advowsons of Kettering, Stoke Albany, Wilbarston, and Rockingham, and the Manors in Rockingham, Garthorp, Barrow (in Rutland), Great Giddiug, Sawtry, &c., and a considerable accession of wealth and influence accrued to him by this alliance with the Digbys, an ancient, honourable, and wealthy family. An ancestor of his bride had distinguished himself as a partisan of Henry VII., at Bos worth Field. Her father had filled the office of sheriff of Rutland several times, and was during many years, M.P. for that county. Her mother was a daughter of Sir Anthony Cope, Knt., vice-chamberlain to Queen Catherine. Indeed many members of this Digby family have been so conspicuous that the reader will, I hope, pardon a digression, in order that I may put before him some of the facts (and fictions ?) recorded about them. Their celebrated family pedigree ^ traces them back to one ^dmar, living at Tilton, in Leicestershire, at the time of the Conquest. It is refreshing to find that he was already there, and did not come over with the Conqueror. His name savours of a Saxon origin, and he may have tilted at William's knights, in defence of his possessions. At any rate he produced a very warlike, adventurous, and pushing 1 For a descni)tion of it .«ee Nichols' Leicestershire, Vol. 3, p. 473. 34 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THK WATSONS. progeny. His great-great-grandson, who died in 1269, married Arabella, a daughter of Sir William Harcourt, thus introducing into the family the blood of another I'ace addicted to "doughty deeds." And in the ninth generation we find that Sir Everard Digby, of Tilton and Drystoke (which seems to have come into possession of his father) was slain, with three of his sons, fighting for Henry VI., at Towton. He and his son and heir, Everard Digby, Esq., rejoiced in the appropriate alias of " Greenleaf." From this Everard Digby, Esq., descended the Digbys of Stoke Dry, and some half dozen other noted families of Digbys. His grandson Kenelm, of Stoke Dry, was the father of Anne Watson. Her eldest brother, Everard, married Mary, daughter and heiress of Francis Nele of Keythorpe. If Nichols' account of this lady may be credited, she must have been a very extraordinary woman. He says she was born in 1513, and was living in 1632. This would make her to have attained the age of at least 119 years. Surely here is a fiction ! She married three husbands. The first was Everard Digby, Esq. of Drystoke, and their eldest son was Sir Everard Digby, of gunpowder- plot notoriety. Her second husband was Sampson Brdeswick of Sandon, Stafford- shire ; and her third, Thomas Digbj'^, a relative of her first husband. According to Doctor Plot she was a sort of female Cagliostro, and came near to discovering the elixir of life. He says she was " A most accomplished lady, and by her most exquisite and perspicuous insight into the most hidden recesses of nature, she discovered the restorative properties of the well in Willoughbridge Park, where three score springs are found within the space of ten square acres, and enclosed them for bathing and drinking, with divers appartments for lodging the poorer sort of diseased and impotent folk." , , Their son, the unfortunate Sir j^cnolm Digby, Anne Watson's fi^se-asctnsia, is described as one of the "most beautiful" men of his time, and " by the accomplishments of his mind, reported one of the finest gentlemen in England." The early death of his father, who was a zealous member of the Roman branch of the Church, left him entirely under the control of the Jesuits, and to their influence is ascribed the part he took in the gunpowder plot. In 1603 he was knighted by James I. at Belvoir Castle. We are told that " To him Maria, daughter and sole heiress of William Mulsho, Esq. of Gothurst, Bucks., resigned herself and her great fortune, but Eumenides tenuere faces de funere raptas Eumenides stravere torum. " She had not been married three years before her husband was snatched from her by an ignominious and merited death." His fate is a matter of history. I will only refer the reader to the notices of him contained in his grandmother's will. ^ 1 See Note C, Will of Mrs. Anne Digby. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 35 His son was tlie celebrated Sir Kenelm Digby, wbose cbaracter is so well given by Clarendon in his " Life." Owing to the active part he took as a Royalist in the Civil War, he was compelled to spend much of his life in France, but returning to England at the Restoration, he died here in 1665. He was noted as an admiral, an author, and philosopher. In the latter capacity he seems to have entertained some singular theories. Unluckily he made his wife (Venetia Anastasia, daughter of Sir Edward Stanley, of Tongue Castle, in Shropshire) the subject of some of his experiments. She was remarkable for her extraordinary beauty, and he was so proud of her that, as we read, " To preserve her health he fed her on capons fed with the flesh of vipers." To joreserve her lovely complexion he was continually inventing new cosmetics for her use, and it is suspected that this too great love for her was the cause of her death, for one morning she was found dead in her bed at the early age of thirty-three. There exist two portraits of her by Vandyke, one in the possession of the family, and one in Windsor Castle. She is represented in a " Roman habit, holding doves in one hand, symbolical of her innocence, and a serpent in the other to mark her triumph over the envenomed tongues of the times." What she was accused of remains in obscurity. The Rockingham Papers shew that Edwai-d Watson, the younger, had for some time assisted his father in the management of the estates. He seems, immediately after his father's death, to have entered upon that energetic discharge of his duties as a magistrate, a verderer of the forest, and a large landed proprietor, which, while it brought him prominently into notice, and ultimately led to a large increase of wealth, honour and influence, evidently, at times, caused some friction between himself and his neighbours. Evidence of his activity as a verderer is furnished by the numerous records of cases of "Unlawful hunting " tried by him, which are found amongst the Rockingham Papers. From them tlie following case is selected because it so well illustrates the operation of the forest laws in their then milder form, and brings us closely into touch with the rural population of the forest districts three hundred years ago. The unblushing effrontery with which the " examinate " tells his first story is thoroughly typical of the poacher in all ages. The circumstantial details of the landlord's wife riding behind iiim on a pillion, and the account of his four or five miles walk from Rushton to Geddington, between half-past seven and nine o'clock on an August evening, without meeting a single person, bring vividly before us the homely and early habits of that age. The cheerful confidence with which the writer skirmishes with the alphabet sufliciently reveals the hand of Dupup in this document, without the Latin attestation of his shai'e in the transaction : 36 KOCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. " The Examynacon of Thomas Sargent of Geddington in the conntie of Northt'. laborer taken before Edward Watson Esquire one of the Yerderors within the fforeste of Rockingham w*Mn the Balyweeks of Brigstocke and Rockingham the XVI*'! daie of August in the XXVII.*'^ yere of her ma^^^^ raigne. " ImjDrimis this Examynate saieth that one Sondaie beinge the Eighte Daye of Auguste he was requested by his Landlord Thomas Walker to carrye the wyfe of the saide Thomas to Rushtou that daie to Dynner w"^ he Did uppon a blacke Mai-e of his own she behynde him uppon a pillyon, where he Dynned and supped that Daie and at after supper he this Examynate turned his mare into a close at Rushton aforesaide emongheste other horses and ymedyatlye wente whome to his owne howse at Geddington and lefte his mare behynde him for the wyfe of the saide Thomas Walker to ryde whome of. And further he saiethe that he Dep'ted from Rushton aboute the sonne settinge and came to his own howse at Geddington aboute IX of the clocke, and wente in at the backe syde of his howse where he founde his mayde sitting up for him and his boye in Bede and he him selfe wente ymedyatlie to Bede and there contynned until the sonne ryseinge of the nexte Daie, And further he this Examynate saithe that he was not in the launde of Benyfeilde nor in the foreste of Rockingham that nighte but in his owne howse, neither yete knewe of any stealers that were there, And beinge Examyned how his mare came into the fforeste brydled and sadeled and who ride upon her this Examynate cannot tell nether yet Dothe he remember that he mete eny betwene Rushton and Geddington nor that eny sawe him at his Dep'ture from Rushton nether yet at his comeinge into Geddington, and more than this he cannot sale. " Sig Thome W sargent." ^ So far the " examinate " appears to have the best of it. But the verderer and his keepers were evidently not to be taken in by him — for, Thomas Sargent was re-arrested, and, having at hand a "learned writer to set down their excommunication," they, like the immortal Dogberry, proceeded to " go about with him " with the remarkable result here narrated. " This Examynate upon his reexamynacon saiethe that of Sondaye beinge the VTlI.th daye of August he was at Russheton at Sr Thomas Treshams howse wheare he dyned and Supped, and after Supper at the Requeste of Mr. button the Parson of Russheton aforesaid he went to the same p'sons Chamber, and took upp his Mare aboute Mydnighte, and rode with the same Parson accompanyed with one Willm Burbage of Rothwell, and a man of on Thomas Treshams of Gedington nowe remayninge in the howse of S'" Thomas Tresham at Russheton whose name he knoweth not to a Reekplace in Pypwell 1 Rockingham Papers. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 37 Closes where they all lighted and left there horses without any body w''^ them, and from thence they went all together w'*^ a brace of Grayhoundes ledde by the said Mr. Treshams man (the one a blacke and the other a dune) into the Launde of Benyfeilde wheare the Dogges were letten slypp and at the ffirste Coui'se they Kylled a Buck or a Sore, at w*^^ Course they loste one of there Grayhoundes, and yet notwithstanding they coursed agayne w'^ the odde Dogge and kylled an other Buck or another male Deei'e. Whiche done this Examynate and Mr. Treshams man carryed the one and the Parson and Burbage carryed the other to the Sheepe Penne wheare they thoughte to have founde their horses, but from thence they were taken, wherupon they carryed the said Deere to a Barne in the Easte graunge in Pipwell and shaked a little heye upon them. And so this Examynate parted fi-om their companye, and went home to his howse at Geddington. Synce w<^^ tyme he sawe not any of his said Company but the Parson, who at the ffirste badde hym not to confesse anythinge, but when he harde his mare was taken upj) by the Kepers he tolde the Parson thereof who then badde hym doe what lie woldc hym selfe, and more than this he cannot sale. " signn Thome — Sakgkaunt "Ed. Watson " In presencia mei Edwardi Dui'UP." Unluckily no record has been found of the punishment which overtook this offender, but according to the forest laws of that date he, having by his offence " put himself in the King's mercie," would be required to " putt in maynprise of fower sureties that he shalbe ever after of goode abearinge in the King's fforests." The following example of a recognizance, given two months later in the same year, by another offender and his four sureties, will serve to illustrate the proceedings in similar cases : " Northt. Memorand qd primo die Octobris Anno regni Dnc nre Elizabeth Dei gi*a Anglic ffraunc et Hibnic Regine fidei Defensor &c. Vicesimo Septimo venerunt coram nobis Thome Brudenell et Edwardo Watson Ai'. Duobz viridiar Dee Dne Rne ad pacem in com pd couservand Assignat Henricus Petche Edwardus Dycher Robertus Myller et Willms fl'oster de Wilbarston in com Northt. yeomen et manuceperunt p Willmo Paynes de eisdem villa et com Glover viz. : quilbt eor sub pcna Quinq librar ac idem Willms Paynes assump sib p seipso sub pena Quadraginta librar Quasquidem sepales sumas tam p'dcus Willms Paynes qua predci manucaptores recognoverunt et quilibt eor se recognovit se debere Dee Dne Rne et concessar De terr tentis bonis et Cattail suis ad opus et usu Dee Dne Rne tier et levar ubicunq invent fuint infra I'cgnni Anglie p preseutes sub condicione sequen. 38 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. " The condicon of this recogBizaunce h suche That if the above bounden Willm Paynes be and p'soiiallie appeare at the nexte Justice seate to be holden within the fforeste of Rockingham and then and there Doe answer to all suche thinges as one the p'te and behalf of our said sov'aigne Ladie the Quenes ma*^'' shalbe obiectcd against him for and concerneinge the uulawfull killinge of a Deere he hathe alreadie confessed, And in the mean tyme doe well and honestlie behave himself againste her Ma'*'^'* Verte venyson and game within all her Ma^'^s fforests Parkes Chaces and Warrens within the said fforest of Rockingham And further Doe at all tymes and from tyme to tyme hereafter within tenu Daies warninge gyven at the howse of the aforesaid Edward Dycher seytuate in Wilbarston aforesaid yealde his bodie prisoner to the prison of Rockingham made and p'vidcd for ofEenders within the said fforest and there doe contynew untill he be thence Delyvered by Due order of her Mat^*^^ lawes That then this present recognizaunce to be voyde and of no effecte or ells to stande remayne and abyde in full force strengthe and virtue. "Ed. Watson." This would seem to be superior to the modern plan of police supervision. For the sureties being liable to forfeit the whole of their belongings in case the offender relapsed, would naturally keep a sharp look out upon him. The vigorous action of the verderer does not appear to have deterred the poachers, for amongst the Rockingham Papers are preserved no less than six similar recog- nizances given in poaching cases, heard by Edward Watson during the ensuing year — 1586 ; but only in one case have I found recorded a repetition of poaching by the same offender, who seems to have been too much for the verderers, and whose case was, accordingly, relegated to a higher cornet. The reader will find an account of this, and of some other cases of unlawful hunting recorded in the Chapter on Rockingham Forest. They possess considerable historical interest. As may be supposed the verderer's activity was resented, and certain persons appear to have lodged a complaint of some kind against him, but they were quickly brought to their senses, as the following document shews : — " fforasmuch as uppon the sight of the certificate from Thomas Shavington, Thomas Cave, William Cave, and Thomas Oveamounte (?) Esquires. It appeereth that the complainte of Thomas Bringhurse, William Lambert, and Laurence Cooper of Easton in the Countie of Leicester against Edward Watson Esquire, is untrue and that the same proceeded rather of malice then good matter, And that they have made offer to submit them selves to the said Edward Watson in the jD'sence of the said gentlemen, acknowledging their misdemeanours in the same. It is therefore thoughte meete that the said Thomas Bi'lnghursCj William Lambert, and Lauience ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 39 Cooper with tlieir confederates, shall before five credible persons of the said Towne of Easton wtliin T wen tie dayes after notice thereof given unto them, confes their slanderous dealings against the said Edward Watson whch if they or anie of them shall refuse to doe. Suche further order shall be taken therein as well for their correcon as the satisfaction of the said gentlemans charge as in this case shall be fitt and conveniente. " Given at London the XXVth of October 1589. " Chr Hatton " 1 Annoyances in connection with his duties as verderer came also from quai-ters whence they might have been least expected. Amongst the manuscripts at Ditton Pai-k is a letter fi'oni Edward Watson to " The Right Worshippful (my) verye good unckeil Sir Edward mountagew Knight," in which he complains that " Jniustic vexations and wrongs " ai*e done daily to him and liis men by Mr. Lane. He sends his uncle Montagu a " bill of chai'ges " (accusations) against the offender, but leaves it to his discretion to act as he thinks best in the matter, as he esteems the continuance of his fi'iendship far above Mr. Lane's. He says he (Lane) " Shamfastly beaves himself soo high of Sir Robt Lane & yourself that manefast wrong is as comra' Avith him as harvest." ^ To the husband of a lady whose family was noted for its strong attachment to the Roman Catholic faith, the performance of the extraordinary duties described in the following letter must have been in the highest degree painful. Tlie extremely matutinal appointment for the " Swaun Inn " merits notice. " To the Righte Honorable my very good Loide S'" John Puckeringe Knighte lorde Keeper of the greate seale of England and one of her Ma"'^* Most honorable privy council. " My bounded dutie unto your I'ighte honorable good Lo : most liumblie premised may it ])lease you to understand : Tlie beai'er hei-eof Mr. Newhall one of the Messingers of her Ma'^''=^ Chamber acquainted me w''* a warrant directed from your Its. (lord.ship) and others the lords of her mat'<^* most honorable privie Councell foi' the searche of Jesuytes, Semynaries, Massingpriests, Masse books and other supersticious thinges thereunto appertayning w*^ whom according to another warrant he shewed me signed with your lip. hande. I went earlie this morning to a house in little Okeley wherein Mr. Bentley his wyfe and famelye now inhabite to searche 1 Rockingham Papers. 2 The Mr. Lane referred to in this letter was probably Mr. Lane, of Gleudon Hall, a descendant of the second son of William Lane, of Orlingbury, who purchased jiart of Glcndon of the Gritlius in 1547. If so he was closely connected by family ties with Edw. Watson, whose maternal grandmother. Cicely, was a daughter of Wm. Lane, of Orlingbury ; and the " Sir Robt. Lane " was also a near kinsman, being descended from the eldest son of Wm. Lane, of Orlingbury. He was Lord of the Manor of Hortiin. For the connection between the Montagus and the Lanes, see "The Montagus of Boughton." 40 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. for one . . . Ohickyn And upon om' present coming thither the Doores were shutt upon us. The Gentleman himself found in his garden att his Booke (by ?) Mr. Newhall who verie carefulie and Dilligentlie behaved himself in this (business ?) And after we made show to breake into the howse. The doores were opened by the Maydes and passing the hawle and the parlour deserous to goe into the Gentlewomans Chamber wee founde her in Bed and after some searche in Deskes Trunkes and Coffers wee founde a Challice and Mr. Newall going nere the Bed founde aboute the same a lyttle Coifer w'^'^ att the first she refused to open : But aferwardes her husband secretly telling him that Massing stuff was therein, Delyuered the keys to Mr. Newhall : wylling him to keepe yt secret from me : who caryed the same from thence to the towne of Kettering, and in my presence there opened yt, wherein there was an other Challice of sylluer, a Crucyfix of Jett, a Surplisse a Masse-booke and diners other vayne thinges belonging thereunto. There were no men in the house wee sawe at our first coming in But himself : He said he hadd a man called Thomas Coste who was gon to Kettering market : we searched his Studdie allso where there is a great many Bookes, and because the tyme was to short to take view of them, I did by the Messinger's directions lock up the Dore and seale the same w'^ my owne scale, meanyng to keepe the keye thereof until I heare further of your lips, pleasm^e therein. Mr. Bentley being unprovyded presentlie to travell he (by the messengers direcion) acknowledged a recognizance to me to her ma"^^ use of a thousand pounds to be at Kettering w''^ his man att the signe of the Swanne ^ there by VI of the clock the next morning, and they two as prisoners to goe from thence w*^ Mr. Newall to your right h° good lip : and the rest of the lords of her ma'-'*'^ most h° privye Councell. and in meane tyme to contynue true Prisoners. Bat Chickin wee colde not fynde. Neuertheles, upon enquyrie made by the messenger at Kettering he was informed by ffraunces Cater a yeoman of her ma'i^** harte houndes that a man by that name had frequented the house of Mr. Bentley and as he harde he was there aboute Easter laste, after whom (as in dutie bounde) I meane to make inquyrie : The rest I refer to the reporte of the Bearer hereof And as in all dutie I most humblie take my leave. Ketering the XXth of June 1595. " Your ho : most humble and at commandm'- "Ed. Watson."2 That the writer of the foregoing letter had no ill will to a Romanist as such, and rejoiced in his escape from persecution, is proved by the fact that, amongst 1 " The Swanne " was an important inn m Kettering at that date, and occupied the corner of Market Street, where now stand the Capital and Counties Bank, and the premises of Messr.s. Goss. 2 See Harl Manuscripts in British Museum. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 41 the interesting papers which were foand concealed in a wall at Rushton Hall, is a letter from him to his friend Sir Thomas Tresham, congratulating him upon his son, Francis Tresham's escape. And amongst the Rockingham Papers is a copy of a similar letter (possibly of the same letter), dated 4th of May, with no year, but probably 1601 or 2 — addressed : " To the right worshippfuU my assured good freind S"" Thomas Tresham Knight ddn these," and which thus begins : " I most heartily thank you for y'' adv'tisments and I am glad to heare of her Ma'*<^^ most gracious lenity. I sh' rest very willing to joyne in bonde with you againe if it be for twice as much for soe good a purpose as this is even when j-ou will w''^out respect of a counterbonde for I hold yr word sufficient for a greater matter." The remainder of this letter refers to the proposed union of two benefices, and the writer thinks "The motion to her Ma*'^ will be most easily effected by a Ladie of the Privie Chamber," and that the benefices " are none so feeble that tliey are not able to maintaine one honest Pai'sou as kiioweth the Almighty to whose p'tection with my most heai'ty com'enduc'ons to y'" selfe and my Ladie 1 leave you. Rockingham this iiij"' of Maj'. "Yours faithfully assured evtry way to use "Ec. Watson." ^ In that brilliant meteoi-ic shower of kniglithoods which, in 16(^8, marked the pi'Ogrcss of the royal comet, James 1., from north to south of the island, Edward Watson had the good foftuiie to be at The Cliartei'liousc on 11th May, in the midst of the stream; and, one falling upon iiiin, he is thenceforth known to biogra2)hy as Sir Edward Watson, and perhaps upon no one more worthy of the iionour did a kniglitliood fall in that memorable year. In August the year following King James was hunting in Rockingham Forest, and a " dyning house" was erected for his accommodation at Sir Edward's Lodge, in Rockingham Park. And on the 9th of August the following year (1605) the King went to Rockingham Castle, and was the guest of Sir Edward for the sjiace of six days, the Queen staying at Kirby Hall, as the guest of Sir Christopher Hatton. 2 In 1608 the King did him the further honour to knight his eldest .son, Lewis, at Grafton. 1 In Stryi>e8' Annals, Vol.3., Piirt 2, p. 449, i.s a letter dated 17th Oct., 1587, from Howlrtnd, Bishop of I'etcrboroush, to the Lord Treasurer, who had asked for notes on some iirominent Justices of the Pence in his diocese. From this letter it appears the bishop considered " Edward Gritlin, Arm., a man of no great capacity or religion, and whose wife was a gi-eat recusent," and " Edward Watson, Ann., a man suspected in religion," that is, inclined to favour the Papists. 2 Nichols' Progresses of James I., Vol. 1, p. 524. If the sprightly Lady Anne Clifford may be credited, to receive a visit from the sapient James and his Court whs not altogether agreeable. She says in her Diary: " From North-hall we all went to Tibbal's to see the King, who used my mother and my Aunt very gi-aciously, but wo all saw a great change between the fashion of the Court as it was now and yt in yc Queen's for we were all lowzy by sittinge in Sir Thomas Erskine's Chamber." 42 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. In connection with the progresses of this King the following extract may interest the reader, from the reference it contains to Sir Edward Watson, which indicates the high social position he held : — " About this time my aunt of Warwick went to meete the Queene (of James I.) haveing Mrs. Bridges w'^ her, and my (cousin) Anne Vauisor; my mother and I should have gone w'^ them, but that hir horses, w^^ she borrowed of Mr. Blmes and old Mr. Hickley, weare not ready; yet I went the same night and overtooke my aunt at Tittenhanger, my Lady Blunt's house, whei'e my mother came to me the nexte day about noone, my aunt being gone before. Then my mother and I went on o"" iorney to ouertake hir, and killed thi'ee horses that day w'''^ extremitie of heate, and came to Wrest, my Lord of Kent's house, where we found the doores shutt, and none in the house but one servaunt Avho only had the keys of the hall, so that we were enforced to lie in the hall all night, till towards morneinge, at tyme came a man and lett us into the higher rooms whei-e we slept three or fower bowers. This morning (?) we hasted away betyme, and that night to Rockingham Castle, where we overtook my aunt of Warwick, and hir compaiiie, when we continued a day or two with old S"^ Edward Watson and his Lady." ^ This journey was in June, 1603, and the party joined the queen at Dingley. In 1612 Sir Edward suffered the loss of his wife, who was buried at Rockingham, 17th February, 1611 (12). She had lived to see her eldest son, Lewis, a knight, a happy husband, and a widower mourning the death of wife and child. Her will, evidently dictated when she felt herself to be dying, is given as an index to her character.2 After his bereavement, Sir Edward does not appear to have taken much interest in his estates. On the 24th January, 1613, he executed a deed by which he gave "absolutely " to Sir Lewis, his " son and heir apparent all and singular the Manuors Lordshipps Rectories Castles Mesiiages landes ten'mnts tithes advowsons Rentes Reversions Services Woodes " &c., &c., " lying and being in Garthorpe Wilbarston Weston Rockingham Cotton Sutton Kettering " &c., &c. ; that is, all that had not already been given to him. With all " the goodes Cattell Chattells Plate ymplements and utensyles of household and husbandry Hangings and j^eaces of Arras and Tapestrie . . . being at or near Rockingham Castle." " Saving and excepting to the said Sir Edward Watson all and singular his wearing app'ell and the furniture of his bedd and chamber." Sir Lewis binds himself that " he shall and will allow to the said Sir Edward Watson yearly out of the issues and p'ffitts aforesaid for his private and p'ticular expense the yearly sum'e of fhftie pounds 1 Diary of Lady Anne CliSord, quoted in Nichols' Progresses of King James I., vol. 1, page 173. 2 Note E, Will of Anne, Lady Watson ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 43 of lawfull money of England to be paid unto the said Sir Ed. Watson nppon the feaste daies of the annunciation of the blessed Virgin St. Mary, of St. John Baptiste St. Michaell tharchAngell and St. Thomas Th'app'le or w"^in tenn Daies after anie and every of the said feast daies by even and equall porc'ns the first payment thereof to begin uppon the feaste of the annunciation next coming, and also shall allow and finde unto the said Sr. Edward Watson during his life for himselfe and Tow servaunts and three Geldings or horses convenient meate drink lodging and keeping." ^ Sir Lewis also binds himself to pay his father's debts, which amounted to £1,842. One item was £540 to his uncle, William Montague, of Little Oakley ; another was £60 to his London tailor. There is one " Valentine Deepupp, of Rockingham, mercer," to whom £5 were due, —was this a son of the Dupup ? Sir Edward had already given ample portions to his daughters, and had made a suitable provision for his other son Edward. In thus disposing of the whole of his possessions, and trusting the care of his declining years to the dutiful affection of his children, he evidently had no apprehension of meeting with the fate of King Lear. His trust was well founded, and he passed the last three years of his life in peace, and was buried at Rockingham, the 4th March, 1616. Shortly afterwards his son erected in the chancel of the church, to the memoiy of both of his parents, an altar tomb, bearing their effigies.2 Some idea of the chai'acter of Sir Edward Watson will have been formed by the reader of the foregoing particulai's of his life. His personal appearance we cannot know in the absence of any portrait. He was evidently another rider, or he would not have made the stipulation about the geldings in his old age. This hereditary love of horse exercise has shewn itself in the family in almost every generation. During his tenure of the estates he and his two sons (9th James I.) sold the Manor, and some other jjossessions in Knipton, Leicestershire, to Roger Earl of Rutland. He bought the AdvoAvson of Stoke Albany, and a property there called the " Ould," of Sir Edward Griffin, the Advowsons of Lutton and Great Gidding. Also a manor there which had belonged to the Vaux, together with several lands and tenements, thus considerably increasing his estate at Gidding.'' He obtained from Mr. Simon Norwich a lease of the Manor, &c., at Bringhurst, and gave it to his son Edward.'* He also evidently began negotiations for the absolute parcliase of Rockingham Castle ; but liis declining years probably hindered a final arrangement, and it was left to his son. Sir Lewis, to complete that purchase. 1 Rockingham Papers. 2 See note at the euil of this chapter. 3Rockiugham Papers. 4 Rockingham Papers. 44 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. Amongst the lands sold by Sir Edward were some in Rothwell, which were purchased by Owen Ragsdall,^ and afterwards bequeathed by him as part of the endowment of his fine hospital there. During his life still further additions were evidently made to the castle buildings, but it is difficult to distinguish between his share in the work and that of his son. We will now follow the fortunes of his children. As shewn by the will of his father, seven daughtei's were born before 1578, and it seemed possible that with him would lapse the male line of the Watsons of Rockingham. But on the 14th July, 1584, six years from the birth of the youngest daughter, " Ludovicus Watson, filius Edwardi," was baptised in Rockingham Church, and eighteen months later Sir Edward's wife presented him with another son who, on the 25th Jnnuary, 1585 — G, was baptised " Edwardus." Thus the male succession was i-endered tolerably secure for another generation. The eventful life of the eldest son. Sir Lewis Watson, will form the subject of the two following chapters, and as his brother seems to have been in some haste to follow him into the world, and to have kept close to him, alike in his prosperity and in his adversity throughout his life, we may conveniently treat their biographies conjointly, and proceed here to considei' the alliances formed by the daughters. The eldest daughter, Anne, baptised at Rockingham, 22nd September, 1569, married Sii- Charles Norwich, son and heir of Simon Norwich, Esq., of Brampton Ash, in Northamptonshire. By his mother he was grandson of Edward Griffin, of Dingle^-, second son of Sir Nicholas Griffin, of Braybrooke Castle.^ The following bequest, from the will of Sir Charles' father, deserves to be preserved : " ff urthermore for as much as the more part of the Inhabitants of the said town of Brampton are very poore for theyr better comfort and relefe for ever hereafter I give (&c.) . . . one yearly rente of ffive marks of Lawfull English money to be issuing . . . out of the said closes . . . called Highfelde als milnfelde, and Rudder Close." These rents were to be paid quarterly, to the trustees whom he appoints, at the north porch of Brampton Church, and the trustees were to distribute the charity at the testator s tomb every Good Friday, amongst the poor inhabitants of Brampton.-^ There ai-e some fine brasses in Brampton Church to the memory of some members of the Norwich family ; and on the east wall of the church, over the sedillia, is a monument to Sir Charles and his lady, Anne Watson. They are represented kneeling, with their hands joined in prayer. Sir Charles died in 1605.'' 1 Rockingham Papers. 2 In Braybrooke church, in Northants, may be seen a monument to this family, upon which are represented quite a menagerie of gi'ifflns, and other heraldic animals. 3 Rockingham Papers. 4 An old pedigree of the Watson family, found amongst the Rockingham Papers, states that Sir Charles Norwich's widow married, as her second husband. Sir William Price, of Washingley, co. Huntingdon. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 45 Their only son, Sir Simon Norwich, was baptised at Rockingham, 20th August, 1594, and died in 1624, leaving a son. Sir John, who will appear later on. Tradition relates that the Norwich estates, in Brampton were, eai-ly in the last century, "lost by one throw of the dice" to Sarah Jennings, Duchess of Marlborough. They still form part of the extensive Northamptonshire possessions of the Spencers of Althorp, who are descended from the great Marlborough's second daughter Anne. The last male representative of this Norwich family is said to have died in extreme poverty in Kettering Union, not long since. ^ The second daughter, Emma, married John Graunte, Esq., of North Bucks, CO. Warwick. The tJdi-d daughter, Mary, married Sir Anthony Maney, of Lutton, in Kent. The fourth daughter, Catherine, mai'ried Sir Thomas Palmer, of East Carlton, Northants. According to the epitaph to their memory in Carlton Church, they had live sons and seven daughters. From them are descended the Palmers of Cai'lton, the Maunsolls of Thorpe Malsor, and other pi'ominent families. The fifth daughter, Elizabeth, was twice mai'ried. First to Sir John Nedham, of Lichborough, who died in 1618. Some years after his death, his widow erected to his memory an altar tomb in Lichborough Church, with an epitaph beginning : " This worthy Knight, subdued by death, Is happe made by losse of breath." Her second husband was Sir Edward Tyrrell, of Thornton, Bucks. He was descended from Sir William Tyrrell, of South Okenden, and Elizabeth, a daughter of Sir Thomas Bodley, founder of the Bodleian Library. It is a singular coincidence that the grandmother of Elizabeth Watson's second husband was Eleanor, daughter of the Loi-d Chief Justice Montagu, of Boughton, and half-sister to her (E. Watson's) own grandmother. This family of Tyrrell must have been very wealthy, for Sir Edwai-d's great-grandmother, Jane Ingleton, is said to have brought thirty manors into the family. According to the old pedigree, above mentioned, the sixth daughter, "Temper- aunce," married Thomas Dolman, Esq. The seventh, " ffrancys " married Rowland Vaughan, Esq., of London, who settled upon her, amongst other property, " The house let to the Venecian Embassado," which formed part of the Priory of the Blessed Virgin Mary, in the parish of St. Botolph, Bishopsgate Without.^ The old pedigree mentions an eighth daughter, Dorothy, married to Sir George 1 See Notes and Quei ries, 7th Ser., Vol. 9, p. 197. 2 Rockingham Piipers. 46 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. Tlii'ogmorton, of Fulbrook. She must have been born after Lewis and Edward, as her name does not appear in her grandfather's wilL Nor is she mentioned in the Rockingham Register, nor in the mother's wilL It will thus be seen that the Watson family, itself a factor of no mean import- ance in the state, had, during the three generations whose history we have been considering, formed alliances with many families of wealth and influence in the kingdom. Note. — Before closing this chapter the author thinks it desirable to state some facts which may help to throw light upon the altar tomb now to be seen in the Mortuary Chapel of Rockingham Church. In his little book on " The Montagus of Boughton," the writer, following Bridges and tradition, refers to it as the tomb of Edward Watson and his wife Dorothy Montagu. Having since carefully examined the tomb, he finds that theory untenable. For the Edward Watson who married Dorothy Montagu was not a knight, and would not have been so represented in his efSgy. We learn from the will of Edward Watson, Esq., of Rockingham, that his executors were enjoined to erect in Rockingham Church, "a fair monument of stone" to his memory within twelve months of his death, and we shall see from the will of Sir Lewis Watson that, during the Civil War, that church was greatly damaged, in fact it appears to have been almost destroyed. This would imply the demolition of the family monuments. From the Rockingham Papers it seems that Sir Lewis Watson spent a considerable sum upon some kind of memorial to his father. There were, therefore, evidently originally tivo'^ monu- ments in the church, which were thrown down and partly demolished by the Parliamentary troops. When Edward, second Lord Rockingham, some years afterwards restored the church, the available fragments seem to have been collected and put together to form one general monument to the memory of his ancestors. The writer believes this theory to be confirmed by the fact that the male figure on the monument now to be seen weai\s the spurs of a knight. It is therefore the effigy of Sir Edward Watson, knight, ob. 1617. But the dress and general appearance of the female figure shew it to be of an eai'lier date, and that is probably the effigy of Dorothy Watson, once on the earlier of the two tombs. The two panels having figures of children palpably do not match, and indeed they do not correspond with the number of children in either of the families of the two Edwards. They are also doubtless remnants of two distinct monuments. A further confirmation of this theory is found in the fact that the shields of arms, now seen over the principal entrance of the castle, were some years since removed 1 In Sir Lewis' account of losses sustained by the Piirliamentnry troops mention is made of the destruction of the family "monuments." ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 47 from the walls of the church. The arms of Watson and Montagu, and Watson and Digby, were no doubt originally on the two tombs. It seems then almost certain that the effigy of Edward Watson, ob. 1584, of the first monument, and that of Lady Watson (Anne Digby) ob. 1611, of the second monument, with portions of the sides in relief, of both the tombs, perished beyond restoration at the time of the wilful destruction of tlie church. What vandalism ! Lyddincjion Church and Remains of Bishop's Palace. Chapter Third. SIR LEWIS WATSON.-PROSPERITY. " He is complete in feature and in mind Witli all s;ood »raco to grace a gentleman." — Shakspere. F all methods of studying histoiy, biography, Avhile it is admitted to be the most profitable, is undoubtedly the tnost pleasant. As the astronomer recognizes the position of a constellation by those stars of greater magnitude which form its rude outline, and afterwards by the aid of the less conspicuous stars fills in the figure of the constellation, and is thus enabled to map out the whole expanse of the heavens, and to realize more perfectly the complicated motions of the planetary bodies ; so the student of history can, by studying the lives of the more prominent men of a particular period in the history of a nation, and afterwards those of men of less note, and applying this method to other periods, obtain a clearer insight into the actual course of events, and into the condition of the nation at each particular period, than by simply studying its history in the ordinary way. As the life of Sir Lewis Watson covered the period of the Great Rebellion, and ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 49 he was tossed up and down, and all but swept away by that destructive wave of social anarchy, his biography will be found to famish a strong side-light for the study of that desolating period. We have seen that he was born in 1584, three months after the death of his grandfather, and we can imagine the joy the birth of an heir, so long deferred, caused in the family at the Castle: a joy certainly not lessened by the birth of his brother Edward eighteen months later. The place and manner of his early education are not known, but as his father occupied a foi-emost position in the county, we may be certain that he educated his son to fit him for the place he was destined to fill. We know that Lewis matriculated at Magdalen College^ Oxford, on the 24th May, 1599, when he was about fifteen years of age ; and that his brother Edwax'd entered the same college on the 29th February, in the following year, at a still earlier age.^ Sir Edward Watson, besides the numerous powerful family connections already mentioned, numbered amongst his friends the Treshams of Rushton,^ the Hattons of Kirby, the Mildmays of Apethorp, the Mordaunts of Drayton, &c. ; and in the society of the families of such friends the two young Watsons reached manhood. Of Sir Lewis we liiive three portraits preserved in Rockingham Castle, all ' attributed to the Scottish artist, Michael Wright.' The portrait on the atairs, probably the earliest of the three, represents him as a handsome man, with regular features and very beautiful eyes. This no doubt shews him as he appeared at the court of James I., after he had been knighted, and before his marriage. At this time he probably formed the acquaintance of George Villiers, afterwards the celebrated but ill fated Duke of Buckingham. We know that a more or less intimate friendship existed between them, for we learn from the Rockingham Papers that some years later Sir Lewis bound himself to a considerable amount as security for the lavish Villiers, at that time probably raising funds. This acquaintance may have been formed at the house of their common friends the Mildmays, with whom Villiers was intimate, and where he had the good fortune to atti'act the notice of King James. The king seems also to have taken a liking to the young heir of the Watsons, as he knighted him at the early age of twenty-four. Sir Lewis' second cousin, Elizabeth, eldest daughter of Sir Edward (afterwards first Baron) Montagu of Boughton, and of his first wife, Elizabeth Jeffery, had 1 Clark, Roijister of the University of Oxford, vol 2., part IT, pp. 234 and 239. 2 In a drawing in raonoclirome of Sir T. Tresliam's nnfinished Market House at Rothwcll, cir. 1720, preserved in the British Muaeiim, the extreme shield on the right himd in the cornice on the east front shews the Watson Arms, a proof, if any were needed, of the close friendship existing between the two families. 3 For a favourable criticism on this artist's work, see Evelyn's Diary, 3r(l October, 1662. 50 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. married Robert, Lord Willouglibj of Eresby, ^' afterwards Earl of Lindsey^) ; and it was probably at Boughton that Sir Lewis first met the Honourable Catherine Bertie, the beautiful sister of that nobleman. Having conceived a mutual attach- ment, they were married in 1609, and the union promised many years of happiness, but the lady died the following year after giving birth to a son. The child was baptised on the 5th February, 1610, by the name of Edward, but survived only four days, and was buried at Rockingham on the 9th February. Lady Catherine died on the 15th of the same month, and was, by her own desire, buried in the Willoughby Chapel, in Spilsby Church, Lincolnshire, where may be seen a monument to her and her father. This monument bears " the figure of a lady veiled resting on her right side : at her feet is an Infant in a cradle covered with a mantle. Behind her are two arches, above which is a nitch containing an inscription to Sir Peregrine Bertie, as follows : — " ' This presents to you the worthy memory of the R''- Hon^^'*^- Sir Peregrine, Knight, Lord Willoughby of Willoughby, Bucks, and Eresby, deservedly employed by Queen Elizabeth as General of her forces in the Low Country and in France^ as Embassador into Denmark, and lastly as Governor of Berwick, where he died in the 47th year of his age, anno 1600, leaving issue by his wife, Lady Mary Vere, daughter of John, Earl of Oxford, five sons and a daughter, viz. : Robert h^- Willoughby, General of the English Forces in Denmark, Peregrine. Henry, Vere, and Roger, and this virtuous Lady Catherine, wife of Sir Lewis Watson of Rockingham, where she died in childbed the 15th of February, I6I0, desiring to be here buried with her father, for whom at her request and for herself in his own affection the said Sir Lewis has erected this monument as a mark of both their virtues to all posterity. Anno Domini 1612.' " The family of Bertie is of great antiquity, and has held a prominent place in English history. One of the ea.rly Saxon kings gave to the ancestor of this family a " castle and town " in Kent, called after them " Bertiestad," now Bersted. The early annals of this family are full of romantic interest, recounting their quarrels with the monks at Canterbury, their flight to the Continent, their i-eturn to Bersted with Henry II., &c. But it must suffice here to notice only the Lady Catherine's grandfather, Richard Bertie, who, educated at Corpus Christi College, became a most accomplished gentleman, " skilled in Latin, French, and Italian." He entered the household of Thomas Wi-iothesley, Earl of Southampton, where he gained the affections of the great Duchess Catherine, widow of Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk. She was in her own right Baroness Willoughby of Eresby. 1 See "Tlie Montagus of Boughton." ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS 51 They were married, and shortly afterwards went through a series of most romantic adventures, a relation of some of which cannot fail to interest the reader. In the reign of Edward VI. the Duchess was a zealous supporter of the Reformation. When Gardiner was restored to power by Queen Mary, he sent for Richard Bertie, and asked " Whether the Lady, his wife, was now as ready to set up Mass as she had been to pull it down, when in a progress she caused a Dog, in a Rochet, to be carried and called by his (Gardiner's) name ? " Bertie saw his wife's danger, and by the advice of his friends, obtained the Queen's licence to travel beyond the sea, upon pretence of collecting some debts due from the Emperor to the late Dake of Suffolk. He sailed from Dover in June. His wife disguised herself, and secretly followed him a few months later, sailing from Leigh, in Essex. After many dangers she joined her husband at Sancton, in Clevesland, but they were soon compelled to hurry away from thence on foot, with her daughter (a child) and two servants, as they learned that the Bishop of Arras had received instructions to question them upon their religion. They reached Wesel, a Hanse town in the same Dachy. "But being got there, extremely weather-beaten with Rain, and going from Inn to Inn to obtain lodging it was refused them by reason he was suspected to be a Lance Knight, and she his woman." They resolved therefore to take refuge in the church porch for the night, and he, going to buy coals to warm them there, heard two young men speak Latin, and enquired of them in that language, "Where they might go to some Walloon's house, they were liappily brought where Mr. Perusel lodged, who had received some favours from the Dutchess in England. They were kindly entertained, and for safetj', changed clothes with the good man and his wife." They obtained a protection from the magistrate, and lived in a house, in the town, when the Duchess was brought to bed of a son, born 12th October, 1555, who, from the circumstances under which he was born, was baptised " Peregrine." But their adventures were not ended. They heard a plot was on foot in England to seize them. They therefore took sudden flight to the Palgrave's Dominions, where, when they were almost starving, they received from the King of Poland (who had heard of their distress) an invitation to come to his country. They set out from Winheim, April, 1557, the Duchess, her children, and servants riding in a waggon. She had with her a Spanish dog. The Landgrave's soldiers, quarrelling about it, thrust their spears into the waggon where the Duchess was, and would have killed her husband, had he not taken refuge in a garret, when a Burgh-Master came to him bringing a person who coixld speak 52 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. Latin, he was thus enabled to send a letter to the Earl of Erbagh, whose kind treatment of the distressed refugees greatly alarmed the soldiers when they found that, in their ignorance, they had insulted people of so high a rank. But all seems to have ended happily. The Duchess and her husband returned to England on the death of Mary. Sir Peregrine died 1582. Their daughter Susan married first Reginald Grey, Earl of Kent ; secondly Sir John Wingfield. The monumental inscri'iition at Spiisby records Peregrine's career. He assumed the title of Lord Willoughby of Eresby, during his father's life time, in 1580, in right of his mother, who died in that year. Sir Robert Nannton, in his Fragmenta Regalia, describes him as " One of the Queen's best swordsmen, and a great master of the Art-Military." ^ At Uffington is a painting representing the incident of the Church Porch.2 As stated above, the eldest son Robert married Elizabeth Montagu, was created Eai'l of Lindsey, and was killed at the battle of Edgehill. By his mari-iage with this lady Sir Lewis Watson gained a considerable accession to his wealth.-^ The early death of his wife was a great blow to him, and in the hope of mitigating his grief by change of scene, he, in compliance with the passport system of that time, obtained the king's permission to " travel beyond the seas, with horses and servants.'"* In the will of his mother, who as stated in the previous chapter, died the following year, the reader will find a touch of romance in the reference to a ring which had belonged to Sir Lewis's lady.^ The -reference made in the same will to her son Edward shews him still in his bachelor estab- lishment at Bringhurst. Rockingham Castle had evidently by this time altogether fallen out of favour as a royal residence, and the king, wanting money as usual, seems to have been glad to find a purchaser for it. By a patent dated the 21st 1[ July, in' the 13th year of his reign, he, for a good round sum of money, paid down, granted the Castle and certain royal demesne lands in Rockingham, Easton, Gretton, &c., to Sir Lewis Watson, "to hold of us our heirs and successors las of our manor of 1 See the Rockingham Papers. 2 Tradition asserts that Peregrine was born in the church porch. In Rockingham Castle is a portrait representing him in armour, and wearing a jewel in his ear. This picture is apparently a half-length copy of a full length portrait in the dining-room at Uffington. 3 One of the Shields of Arms over the principal entrance to Rockingham Castle (see chap. 6), is Watson impaling Bertie with these eight quarterings : — 1, Bertie ; 2, Willoughby ; 3, Beke ; 4, Ufford ; 5, Fitzalan and Maltravers; 6, Welles; 7, Engayne ; 8, Watertor.. (Everard Green, F.S.A.) 4 A writer in Bailey's Magazine, presently referred to, in ignorance of Sir Lewis's bereavement, describes this as " doing the grand tour." 5 See note E. Will of Anne, Lady Watson. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 63 East Greenwich ... by fealty only in free and common Socage and not in chief or by Knights service. Rendering yearly . . . 28s. 5d." This rent was shortly after compounded for, and the Castle and other royal possessions adjacent (but 7iot the New Park) were granted to Sir Lewis in fee simple.^ Having thus become the absolute possessor of the Castle, Sir Lewis entered with energy and great judgment upon the improvement of the surrounding pleasure grounds. He obtained the royal sanction to divert the public road more towards the east, and thus included within his grounds that glen, or ravine (formerly the old road)^ which now forms the sheltered and i^omantic entrance towards the Castle from the south, having to the east of it that high ridge of land traversed by the fine avenue of lime trees. Upon this ridge are certain small mounds, or undulations which some antiquaries have pronounced tumuli, but it is more probable that they simply mai'k the site of .some cottages, which,- accoi'ding to the map referred to, once stood thei'eabouts. Sir Lewis, however, was not so entirely absorbed in the alterations and impi-ove- ments he was making in his domains, as altogether to neglect the Court. Early in 1619 he was in London, and we thus get a little Court news. Amongst the manuscripts collected by the late Lord Montagu, at Ditton Park, are several letters from Sir Lewis Watson to his cousin, Edward, first Baron Montagu of Boughton. These letters shew what a olo.se intimacy existed at that time between the Boughton and Rockingham families, and also how highly Sir Lewis was esteemed by his relatives. A rather serious dispute had arisen between Charles and Sidney, the younger sons of Sir Edward Montagu, and their eldest brother, B aron Montagu, respecting .some property. This, we learn, was in time settled by arbitration. Sir Lewis was evidently the mediator employed by the pacific Baron Montagu, to reconcile his brothers. In the course of a letter written in April, 1619, Sir Lewis says, " I have had another bout with Sir Sidney and Sir Charles ... I hope we shall conclude it before you hear from me again." He then launches into public matters : — " We have been so long about this Business that I have no Tyme leaft me to write you the Newes as I would. You shall heare nothing this Terme of the great Business of the Starr Chamber. They will scarce be ready for the next Terme. The King is pretty well recovered and come Last night to Ware, so to Tiballs dureing Pleasure. The gout is gotten into one of his knees w'^^ make him to be carried all the way in a Chare. The States gee away without doeing any Thing 1 See Bockinghtim Papers ami Patents of James I. 2 See old map in Rockingham Castle. 54 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. wliicli most are glad of. They would Tye the king to such hard conditions. " So S'^ for thys tyme 1 leave you " Your sure loving cousin to dispose L. Watson." A few days later he writes to Lord Montagu : " I did not write to you Last week, because T had not brought my endeavours to so good ways as now I hope they are, (I mean with your brother S'' Sidney). Yet I must tell you that I had brought the Endes so neare to gether, that I thought to see them touche, by cause I did never so much as suspect that He would stand uppon those Leases w'^'^ He had made Himself . . . The King doth recover his strength every day better. The Ambassador for France is com : a very brave gentleman, and hath been, receaved with that State as never yet I see any from thence. My Lord of Southampton was sworn a Counsellor on Friday Last. The King cometli to White Hall on Fryday next day to Greenwich, It was expected that the Master of the Wardes should have beane also a counsellor but I rather thinke you will heare some other Newes shortly. So S'" for this Tyme I com'itt yon to God resting. I am told by divers that a Last of Powder is 24| barrells, your ready cousin to dispose. L. Watson." " To my Worthy and Respected Cousin S"" Edward Montagu of the Honourable order of the Bath this at Boughton." The conclusion of this letter is somewhat obscure. The information respecting a last of powder was probably intended for a postscript, but somehow got mixed with the text, producing what has the appearance of a cryptogram. Although King James sold this hunting seat, he reserved his right of hunting, and came once more to the Castle as the guest of Sir Lewis, on the 29th July, 1619. On this occasion he knighted his entertainer's brother, Edward.^ This is the last recorded visit of an English sovereign to Rockingham Castle. But so far as Sir Lewis and his dependants were concerned, a far more precious visitor was shortly to grace the Castle with her presence. Sir Lewis, having lived a widower for ten years, took a second wife on the 3rd October, 1620. This Lady was Eleanor, second daughter of Sir George Manners, of Haddon, co. Derby, and sister to John, eighth Earl of Rutland. This alliance again brought the Watsons into touch with the Montagus of Boughton, for the 1 In connection with this Icnighthood, a curious blunder is made by the writer of an article upon " The Royal Buckhounds " in Bailey's Magazine for February, 1887. The writer, ignorant (as genealogists also appear to have been) of the existence of this brother of Sir Lewis, grows very sarcastic, and speaking of this visit of the king, says : " He then and there knighted his host's oldest sou, Edward, who must have been, at this time, a child of tender years. What a mania James had for dubbing ! " This is amusing, knowing as we do that Sir Lewis was a widower, and that his " oldest son " had been dead seven j'ears. yiii Liswis Watson, cir. 1620. Pace 55. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 55 bride's brother bad married Frances, daughter of Edward, first Baron Montagu of Boughtoii, and of his second wife, Frances Cotton.^ This family of Manners was for some centuries settled at Ethale, in Northum- berland, in which county some of its members rose to distinction. In the 15th century Sir Robert Mannei'S, of Ethale, marr'ied Eleanor, daughter and heiress of Thomas, Lord Ros, who bi'ought her husband her father's extensive possessions, amongst which were Belvoir Castle, co. Leicester, and Stoke Albany, and Wilbarston, with other property in Northamptonshire, which the Lords de Ros (or Roos) had inherited from the de Albinis by the marriage of the daughter of William de Albini with Robert de Roos in the 13th century. Thomas, 13th Lord de Ros, the grandson of Sir Robei't Manners, of Ethale, and Eleanor de Ros, was created Earl of Rutland by Henry VIII., and his gi-andson. Sir George Manners, of Haddon, co. Derby, was the father of Lady Eleanor Watson. 2 Thus once again we find Sir Lewis in the enjoyment of that domestic life for which he seems to have been so eminently fitted, and of which he had so transient a taste ten years before. About this time was probably painted Wright's second portrait of Sir Lewis shewing a handsome, intellectual looking man, in a suit of armour. This is a very good picture.^ Perhaps a slight cloud overshadowed this otherwise happy union. Some disap- pointment would be felt on account of the delayed bii'th of an heir. As usual daughters came in abundance. Grace was born in 1623, Anne in 1625, Frances in 1626, Elizabeth in 1627, Eleanor in 1629. But it was not until 1630, neariy ten years after their marriage, that Lady Eleanor presented Sir Lewis with his fiist son, who was baptised at Rockingham on the 30th June, in that year, by the name of Edward. On the 13th May tlic following year another son was baptised by the name of Lewis, and buried the same day. In 1637, after an interval of six years, another daughter, Catherine, was born. This was the last child. In the meantime King James had further ennobled the father by creating him a Baronet in 1621. Noble, wealthy, a happy husband and father, the possessor of a splendid home, with all the gifts of a courtier, Sir Lewis might have been expected to take a prominent part in public affairs. On the contrary, he seems to have shunned the 1 An interesting letter (which was found concealed with other papers in the roof of Boughton House) from this Countess of Rutland to her father is preserved in the " Montagus of Boughton." 2 See Pedigree of Manners. 3 See portrait. 56 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. Coart (of whicli lie may have seen too mucli), and to have settled down in the bosom of his family, amongst his dependants, and to have spent his time in the improvement of his estates, and in the exercise of the hospitable duties of a country gentleman. He filled the office of High Sheriif of the County of North- ampton during the year 1634, and was early made a Justice of the Peace, and was a Deputy Lieutenant of the county of Northampton. The following letter probably refers to one of the stringent orders respecting the forest, which were issued early in the new reign. " My Lord, " If this cold Morning Both of Fi'ost and Snow did not hinder me (being full of Cold already) I would have waited on your Lo : Ship my Self. Yesterday my Lord of Westmorland sent unto me by his Servant young Bellamy That I would give him Meeting at Welldon : where I Little Thought to have seen such an Order as you will perseave by this Inclosed being a Copy thereof. Which I thought good to send to your Lo : Ship bycause it may be you have not seen It as yet. The Order it Self not being sent to Mr. Sheriif sooner than yesterday. Intending to waight on your Lo : Ship so soone as I dare stirr abroad I take my Leave and rest " Your Lo : Ships Kynsman very assuredly to Com'and "Rockingham 3 Jan? 1625(6) " L. Watson " For the right honb'"^ & very good Lord Edward Lord Montagu." ^ Besides the demesne immediately surrounding the Castle, there was to the south and west of it, that extensive park, described in the first chapter, called the New Pai-k, containing a royal hunting lodge. This must have been a sort of Nabuth's Vineyard to Sir Lewis, possessing as he did the whole of the surrounding property. But fortunately for him King James, in 1619, presented this park to his favourite, the Marquis of Buckingham, who immediately sold it to Sir Lewis Watson for a considerable sum.^ Besides this purchase of Rockingham Park, Sir Lewis made large additions to his property. In 1634 he purchased the fairs, markets, and bakehouse in Kettering of John Sawyer and others.^ The same year he purchased of -Str Brocas 1^4'xall; Hunter's Manor in Little Weldon, with the Mastership of the 1 Ditton Manuscripts. 2 See Rockingham Papers. The deed provides for the purchase money to be paid "at the Temple Church." 3 Twenty seals are attached to this deed. See Rockmgham Papers. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE AVATSONS. 57 Royal Buckliounds.i In 1638 he purchased of Sir Edward Griffin and others the Manors of Wilbarston and Stoke Albany,^ and the following year other lands in the last named lordship. In IGil he jim-chased of Charles Cotterell the Manor of Wilsford, in Lincolnshire. This last purchase ijitroduces us to a delightful letter from his wife. He being at Wilsford about the time of this puzchase, received the following letter : " To my Loueing husband Sir Lewis Watson at Wilsford " Sweet harte "I thanke you for 3'oure plouar the which ar very great daynties to us indeede for the sweet sauce which is your kindnes in sending them and will procure us doctai- diat and doctar meoriman (? mcrriman) at the eateing of them, writing to you so Lately, I have no more to say now but that I will pray for your good health and reraayne " Your ever loueing " Rockingham Wife Novem : 23 " Ei-k.\nok Watson." ^ " I have given the bearer only i**-" The affectionate playfulness of this letter shews how little a married life of twenty years had weakened the love between husband and wife. As the distance between Rockingham and Wilsford was considerable the doulit suggested in the postscript of the adequacy of the remuneration given to the bearei- was natural. We here reach the culminating ])oint of Sir Lewis' prosperity and see him the possessor of the Castle, Park, &c., and whole township of Rockingham, with the manorial rights, ])rofits of fairs, markets, there ; the Manor of Cotton (in Grettoii), Hunter's Manor in Little Weldon, with the Mastership of the Royal Biickhounds, the Manors of Wilbai-ston and Stoke Albany, the Manor of Lutton, the fairs, markets, &c., at Kettering, the Advowsons of Rockingham, Kettering, Stoke Albany, Wilbarston, Weston and Sutton, and Lutton, all the above being in Northamptonshire ; whilst in Leicestershire he was Lord of the Manor of Garthorp, held long leases from the Uean and Chapter of Peterborough of the Manoi-s of Easton, Bringhurst, and Drayton, with the Advowsons of those four parishes. And in Huntingdonshire he owned the three manors in Great Gidding, the Manor of Sawtry, and the Advowsons of those two parishes. And in the 1 See Chapter 7. 2 See Chapter 2, and Note G, Manorial Pcssessioiis of the Watsons. 3 Hockingham Papers 68 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. county of Lincoln lie possessed the Manor and Advowson of Wilsfoi'd. We see him occupying a high social position, surrounded by family connections, many of whom were men of influence in the State, and by a circle of friends which included the leading county families. By birth he was closely allied to the Montagus of Boughton, to the powerful Earl of Manchester, to the founder of the distinguished family of the Earls of Sandwich, and to the Digbys of Stoke Dry. By the marriage of his aunts he was connected with the Brookes of Great Oakley, &c. By his own marriages, he had contracted close family ties with Rob. Bertie, first Earl of Lindsey, and with the Earl of Rutland. The marriages of his sisters gave him for brothers-in-law, amongst others, Sii* Charles Norwich, of Brampton Ash (which allied him to the Griffins, of Dingley), and Thomas Palmer, of East Carlton. The Mastership of the Royal Buckhounds, a post of honour, although of no great emolument, while it cemented his connection with the Court, added considerably to his dignity in the county. In 1626 Sir Lewis assisted his brother to purchase Stoke Park of Sir Edward Griffin and his wife, which thenceforth became the residence of Sir Edward Watson,i who seems to have been associated with his brother in most of the family transactions. Thus his name appears as trustee in a deed for the augmentation of the dower after Sir Lewis' marriage with Eleanor Manners, and in many other family deeds. When, some years later, the Griffins sold the Manor of Stoke Albany to Sir Lewis Watson, Mr. Conyers Griffin and his sister Lucy continued to reside in the fine old Manor House there, and a close intimacy appears to have existed between the bachelor at the Park and the brother and sister at the old Manor House, an intimacy which seemed likely to lead to a closer bond between the two families. But Sir Edward Watson's affections were evidently too much wrapped up in his brother's family to permit him to contract family ties of his own. Sir Lewis appears to have completed the works commenced by his grandfather and carried on by his father, and to him is doubtless due the Jacobean finish given to the gables, &c., at the Castle. He spent a large sum upon the pleasure grounds, and probably replaced the curtain wall on the north and west by the present revetment, and thus threw open the fine views of the Welland valley on those sides. To him has also been ascribed that wonderful yew hedge which now separates the lawn from the flower parterre. But this seems more in the stiff style of landscape gardening which found favour later in that century. 1 See Note G, Manorial possessions of the Watsons. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 59 Having followed the life of Sir Lewis to the fifty-seventh year of his age, and seen him at the summit of his prosperity, there remains the painful task of following him iu his advei'sity. The consideration of his reverses, and of the alliances formed by his children, is reserved for the next chapter. Chapter Fourth SIR LEWIS WATSON, (Afterwards First Bahon Rockingham of Rockingham Castli;.) ADVERSITY. " But if Authority grow wanton, woe To him that treads upon his free-born toe." -Cowper. " As the sun Thou did'st rise gloriously, kept'st a constant course In all thy journey ; and now, in the evening, When thou should'sc pass with honor to thy rest Wilt thou fall like a meteor ?"— Massivger. " You have fed upon my seignories, Disparked ray parks, and felled my forest woods, From mine own windows torn my household coat, Raz'd out my impress, leaving me no sign — Save men's opinions, and my living blood — To shew the world I am a gentleman." — Shahspere. OTWITHSTANDING the ominous symptoms of a fearful eruption of the long smouldering social volcano, which had for two or three years manifested them- selves, there were many men at the commencement of the tiftli decade of the seventeenth century, who evidently did not realize what a terrible convulsion was then impending. Few were gifted with the pre- science which enabled Evelyn, at that time less than twenty-one yeai's of age, to wr-ite in June, 1641, ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THK WATSONS. 61 that lie had presented his sister with his " picture in ojle, being her request, on my resolution to absent myself from this ill face of things at home, -which gave umbrage to wiser than myselfe, that the medaill was reversing, and our calamities were but yet in their infancy." The reader does not need reminding of the series of misunderstandings, and open ruptures, followed by patched up truces between the King and his Parliaments, which preceded the assembling of the ill-omened Long Parliament in November, 1640 ; nor of the strong measures at once adopted by that body to curtail the royal prerogative, nor of the murder of the ill-fated Strafford early the following year. These measures, together with the singling out in each county of those officers who remained loyal, and presenting a list of their names to Parliament as " delinquents," must liave alarmed many country gentlemen. But still, amongst the noble and county families, many were found to espouse the parliamentary side, actuated, we may pi'esume, by a belief in the honesty of the professions made by the leaders of the popular party that their sole object was to check the encroachments of the crown upon the liberties of the people. Had they foreseen that they were aiding to set up a tyranny as great as, if not greater than, that which they feared, we may suppose the names of such men as Essex, Manchester, and even Fairfax, would not have been found on that side. On the other hand many countiy gentlemen did not hesitate at once to throw in their lot with the King, and remained devotedly loyal to him to the end: forfeiting their fortunes, and in many instances their lives, in defence of his cause. In the Midlands " amongst the earliest of these adherents to the royal cause may be reckoned Sir Gervase Lucas, wlio raised a legiment of hoi-se in 1642; Baptist Noel, Viscount Campden, who also i-niscd and maintniued, at his own expense, a troop of horse and a company of foot ; and Mr. Mason, the Rector of Ashvvell, who appeared personally in ai'uis in command of fin independent company."^ But many prominent men throughout England must have found themselves, like Sir Lewis Watson, hampered by the close family ties which bound them to leading men on the pai'liamentary side, and who were thus induced to delay taking that active part on tlie side of the King which their inclinations dictated. They probably trusted to matters righting themselves without their active interference. That Sir Lewis Watson was at heart a Royalist may be seen from the following : Mary, Countess of Westmoreland (second wife of Mildmay, second Earl of Westmoreland), made several applicatitms that her son, Vere, might be made 1 Nichols' Leicestershire. 62 ROOKINGHiVM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. a deputy of the Forest of Rockingham; and on the 1st April, 1631, she wrote to Secretary Dorchester beseeching that " If her son have not the deputation of the Forest alone, Sir Lewis Watson may have no command over him." Against Sir Lewis' name the secretaiy has made this note, "A gentleman very able and always ready in his Majesty's service." ^ The following sketch of the part taken by various family connections of his, during this period of social anarchy, will give the reader an idea of the difficulties by which Sir Lewis was surrounded. His father's cousin, the first Baron Montagu of Boughton, although during the earlier misunderstandings between the king and his Parliament, he had supported every measure which tended to enlarge or secure the liberty of the subject, yet when the great question of the control of the militia — the culminating point in the dispute between King and Parliament — ai'ose, at once, as lord lieutenant of the county, sided with the King, and proceeded to carry out his duties of a Commissioner of Array. He was consequently seized by the Parliament, and committed to the Tower, where he died in 1644).2 On the other hand Lord Montagu's son-in-law, the Earl of Rutland (Sir Lewis' brother-in- law), was a sti^ong partisan of the Parliament ; so was Lord Montagu's bi'other, the Earl of Manchester. The Brookes of Gi-eat Oakley wei^e also Parliamentarians. We thus see that Sir Lewis was pulled both ways by family influence, and he seems, like many men of that period, to iiave temporised; and although he attended the committee meetings at Kettering in his capacity of a deputy lieutenant, he does not appear to have put his name to any document. This was doubtless the snui'ce of the suspicion of disloyalty which afterwards foi- a time attached to him. We can understand the reluctance a man of Sir Lewis' peaceful, home-loving disposition would feel to precipitate a lupluve with these influential family CDnnections by hastily declaring himself an active partisan of the opposite side. Moreover he had doubtless heard of the numerous well authenticated acts of wanton destruction, committed even upon the property of their friends, which disgraced some of the royalist soldiers. Such for instance as that recorded by Whitelock, who says that " Pi-ince Rupert ranged about with great Parties, who committed strange Insolences and Violences upon the Country," and that " At Fawley Court about 1000 of the King's horse was quartered with Sir John Biron and his brother, who gave strict orders that they should committ no Insolences, . but Soldiers are not easily governed against their plunder," and he says that, notwithstanding the pledges given, they littered their horses with sheaves 1 Cal. State Papers, Domestic, Charles I, This letter indicates a breach in the old friendship between the Westmoreland and Watson families. 2 See " The Montagus of Boughton." ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 63 of wheat, tore up important writings left in his study, and valuable books to light their pipes ; thus destroying many important family documents and manuscripts of his father and others ; broke down the park palings, killed many of the deer and let out the rest, took away his fine hounds, broke open boxes, chests, &c., and took away the linen, and, in pure wantonness, ripped open the feather beds ; and all this havoc was committed in a house which seems to have been placed at their disposal by the owner ! Truly Sir Lewis might well hesitate to admit a garrison of such men into his house. However, after the battle of Edgehill, fortune seemed so to favour the Royal cause, that there was a prospect of the King's speedy triumph. The chief strength of the Parliamentarians, out of London, lay in the Eastern and Midland counties, but even in these latter they evidently began to despair, for we read in one of the organs of that party " Special Passages and Certain Liformation from Seuerall Places," for January, 1643, " This week past some thousaiuls of horse from Oxford to Brackley and so over the Bast Pai-t (and best affected) of Northampton- shire, he hath plundered Tossiter and will certainly undo the people if relief come not to them."^ And in " The Kingdom's Weekly Intelligence," of the same month and year, we read, " Prince Rupert with his horse has plundered divers small towns in North-Hampton-Shire and seized tlieir horses and committed great outrages. And in a letter in " Special Passages," dated 28th January, 1643, it is stated that " The parliamentary party is in a sad condition, taking refuge in Northampton," and the writer suggests " a flying ai-my of 3 or 4000 horse under wise active and faithful commanders to disturb the enemy" {i.e. the Royalists.) ^ This feeling of apprehension dictated, no doubt, the following report of the result of a street brawl (taken from the same pamphlet). The passage shews that the practice of giving a distorted and misleading account of the actions of the opposite pai"ty is not an invention of the more disreputable pai-ty papers of this age. " From Kettering, in Northamptonshire, we understand that there is in the Town and the Parts about such a Malignant Partie " (the Royalists again !) " that they hire men to murther men as they go along the streets, and in Particular a servant of the late deceased worthy Gent Mr. Sawyer."^ Other extracts might be given to shew how the activity and increasing strength of the Royalists in Northamptonshire, in the early part of 1643, caused the parliamentary party to tremble for the safety of one of their chief strongholds. In proportion as the Parliamentarians saw cause to despair, the Royalists grew 1 Kings's Pnmphlcts, in the British JhiReiim. (54 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE ANJ) THE WATSONS. more hopefal, and Sir Lewis evidently expected his party would utilize Rockingham Castle ; and the manner in which he prepared to receive a royalist garrison illustrates the apprehension excited at that time by the approach of friend and foe alike. He sent his plate and other articles of great value to his brother-in-law, the Earl of Rutland, whose castle at Belvoir was at that time one of the chief strongholds of the Parliament, and served as a convenient centre from which their troops could harass and control the neighbouring counties. Here the treasures were supposed to be protected from the Roundheads by the influence of the Earl, and from the Cavaliei's by the strength of the Castle. But the latter trust proved delusive. The reader will remember the three gentlemen who, as stated on page 60, were amongst the first in the Midlands to espouse the Royal cause ; and we live told that " By these gallant associates, (whose standard on this occasion was blue and gold, with the motto ' Ut Rex Sit Rex') the Castle of Belvoir was very early taken possession of.''^ Both royalist and parliamentary papers of the day report the capture of this castle by the king's friends. We give the parliamentary version on account of the ingenious fable of the measuring of the table by " one Lucas," evidently introduced to detract from the credit the opposite party gained by their dashing action. " A Perfet Diurnal &c. 9 Feb : 1643. It is informed for certain that some of the King's forces have gotten possession of Bever Castle which is the Earl of Rutland's which was betrayed in this manner, viz : The Cavaliers having made some attempt to get it, and being repulsed by the earl of Rutland's servants which were in it though they rather came to view tlie strength of it, than having any hopes to take it, and after fair words and royal entertainment brought out to them (but not admitted to come into the Castle) at last they applyed themselves in soliceting one Lucas, which hath long served the same Earl, to betray the Castle unto them, who lived about a mile from thence, which he did in this manner : viz : the said Lucas having full ingresse and regresse at the Castle, he came very subtlely thither and desired to take measure of a Table in one of the Rooms of the Castle, pretending that his wife desii'ed to have one of the same size, which being granted him, he took occasion when he was in the Castle, to open a window, which not being perceived, or at least (nothing being suspected) not taken notice of, was left open all night, and in the dead time of night, the Cavaleers were brought by him unto the window, where they crept in privately in such abundance, and before they were discovered, that they became masters thereof : and it is reported that they have spoiled the said Bail's goods 1 Nichols' Leicestershire. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 65 plundered the Castle, and put out liis men, and are fortifying it for the King."^ But the ascendency of the royalists in Northamptonshire was only temporary. In December, the previous year, a young man had been made Sergeant Major General of eight thousand men raised in Northamptonshire and some adjacent counties, and his dashing attacks quickly changed the aspect of matters. This was Lord Grey of Groby, son of the Earl of Stamford. Although, owing to the opposition of the Earl of Suffolk and Lord Cranborne, his commission appears to have been held back for a tirae,^ he entered at once upon a series of rapid movements that took the Cavaliers by surprise. Thas early in 1643 we find him in the neighbourhood of Harborough, shortly afterwards near Oundle, and on the 19th March, 1643, he appeared suddenly at Rockingham, when Sir Lewis was looking for a visit from the King's troops, and taking possession of the Castle he the same night conveyed Sir Lewis and all his family to his brother. Sir Edward Watson's house at Stoke Park. Thus a clean sweep appeared to have been made of all Sir Lewis' household goods, plate, and treasures. We can imagine his misery as, in his enforced retirement at Stoke Park, he thought of the devastation the parliamentary gari-ison was causing upon his estate at Rockingham, and trembled for the safety of those treasures he had committed to the safe keeping of his brother-in-law, which were now exposed to the tender mercies of the King's soldiers. But he was to have an earlier opportunity than he anticipated of ascertaining for himself the fate of those treasures, for the Royalists possessed a leader as active in skirmishing warfare as was Lord Grey — this was Colonel Hastings. He with his troops swept the county of Northampton, by way of Wellingborough to Kettering, thence to the neighbourhood of Rockingham, disarming " malignants " on the way. Coining to Stoke Park in May, 1643, he pounced upon the unfoi-tunate Sir Lewis and. his brother, and. conveyed them as jirisoners to Belvoir Castle, upon the charge that no real attempt had been made to hold Rockingham Castle for the King. They were kept at Belvoir for a short time, and then, for greater security, sent to Lord Campden's ca.stle at Ashby de la Zouch, a very strong garrison of the Royalists. They wei'e detained here until August of the same year, when in compliance with frequent petitions of Sir Lewis, they were taken to the King at Oxford, that Sir Lewis might clear himself of the charge of disloyalty. Here we will leave him for a while, and follow events at Rockingham. 1 King's Pamphlets (large quarto), British Museum. 2 See King's Pamphlets, British Museum. This Lord Grey was one of the most active of the parliamentary commauclers, and was one of the judges upon the trial of the king, and his name appears amongst the siguatui'es to the death warrant. 66 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. Having taken possession of the Castle, Lord Grey at once fortified it very strongly. He surrounded the keep Avith a stockade and planted cannon upon it, so as to command the easier approaches to the Castle. A curioi;s and interesting j^lan of these fortifications, preserved amongst the Rockingham Papers, is given here. From this plan the reader will gain a clearer idea of the strength which the parliamentaiy garrison gave to the Castle, than from any description. He remained in supreme command there for a time, but his services being required to clear the neighbourhood of the royalist troops, the command of the Castle was transferred to Sir John Norwich of Brampton Ash, who had espoused the parliamentary cause. It must have been very galling to Sir Lewis Watson to learn that the grandson of his eldest sister, Anne, was ruthlessly destroying the beautiful grounds on which he had spent so much money, and was holding Rockingham for the King's enemies. The parliamentary generals evidently considered the Castle a valuable acquisition, and spared no pains to retain possession of it, which they succeeded in doing until the end of the struggle. Sir John Norwich was, for a time, superseded in the governorship by Robert Horseman, but we find him as governor again in 164-5, and he appears to have remained in command till the Castle was given back to the owner. The Royalists made many unsuccessful attempts to take the Castle, and it is no doubt in connection Avith these attempts that the followino- incident may be supposed to have occurred. This is the one solitary tradition relating to the siege of the Castle which the writer has been able to gather on the spot. The tradition is that " one night the sentinels within the castle walls were alarmed by sounds which indicated the stealthy approach of a body of besiegers. . Their challenge not being answered, the sentinels fired. The awakened garrison rushed to their aid, and a general fusillade ensued. Instead of the return fire they anticipated, they were answered by a succession of most unearthly sounds, which increased their alarm, and made them fancy themselves confronted by something diabolical. Not daring to venture on a sortie until daylight, they passed some very uncomfortable hours, until the dawn revealed to them the fact that the supposed besieging force was a herd of swine strayed thither from the neighbouring forest." The following passages, copied from pamphlets, &c., of the period, are the only authentic references the author has found to incidents connected with the holding of the Castle by the parliamentary garrison. In a letter from Za. Dale to Mr. H. Noel, son of Lord Campden, March, 1643, it is stated that " Sir Edward Hartop and Captain Wayte are in Rockingham Castle" (5th Report of Royal Hist. Com. on MSS. p. 79). ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 67 The following specimen of sarcasm is from a royalist source : " Sunday, May 7, 1643. This day also we had advertisement what barbarous acts have been committed by the I'ebels there (in Northamptonshire) especially how one Master Reinolds being asleep in his own house, one of these plundering rebels set a pistoll to his mouth and shot him dead as he lay asleep. And the reader may observe, that though there be two Garrisons the one in Northampton, the other at Rockingham Castle, which are maintained there (as themselves say) to preserve the peace of the county and keep it from plundering, yet Cromwell must be permitted to run over all the Country and plunder all the Cheife Gentry and such others as he pleases. So that to keep a Country in Peace and free from Plundering is to awe it with garrisons and armed men, that when the appointed plunderer shall come he may find the people tame and more easie to be pillaged." -3/ercMrms Aulicusy (Printed at Oxford.) From the same paper we take the following as an illustration of the activity of the Royalists against the garrison at Rockingham: " Friday, June 9, 1643. This day we had intelligence that upon Friday last certain of his Majesty's forces to the number of five hundj'od horse or thei'eabouts came to Rockingham Castle in the county of Northampton, and understanding that Major Mole (the governor there) was then sitting with a sub-committee at Weldon, about three miles distant, about imposing a new tax upon the eastern parts of Northamptonshire, which he required should always be paid a month beforeliand, u))on ])ain of being presently plundered. His Majesty's said forces placed some about the castle close under the wall, and marched Avith the rest towards Weldon, to have taken the Mole as he was working. But he who had often before made himself to be swifter of foot than vermin of that kind used to be, betook himself to his wonted ai-t of running, and recovered the woods : wherefore his Majesty's forces fell to beating up all the coppices and quarters in hope to have found him, but he lay hid as close as when last he ran from Banbury, whereupon the soldiers were enforced after they had killed and taken some few of his foUowei-s to rest satisfied with only a thousand oxen, cows and sheep, which they found in Rockingham forest and Stoke park, and with some special horses which were kept near the castle (secure as they supposed) within command of their cannon, some of them within musket shot, which cattle were many of them stolen from the country people to supply the rebels in the Castle ; which his Majesty's forces dravo towanls their rendezvous at Belvoir Castle : but withal made proclamation that if any of them were the Catle of any commoners in Rockingham forest, or were hired to be jo3-sted in Stoke park, let the owners repair to them and tell their marks each man shall 1 King's Pamphlets, British Museum. 68 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. tave his own again : for they had no commission to take any thing from any of his Majesty's loyal subjects, but from the I'ebels only : whei-eupon many adjoining country people resorted to them, and had restitution accordingly ; yea some of them got some cattle which had been stolen formerly from them by the rebels. The rebels after the king's forces were gone out of those pai'ts returned to the castle in the night, and upon Saturday, June 3rd, they went to Master Nevill's grounds of Holt, in Leicestershire, about three miles distant from the castle, and to some other grounds adjoining, from whence they plundered all the gentlemen's cattle which depastured there, and then returned in triumph, and reported that they had recovered their own cattle from the cavaliers, whom indeed they durst not look in the face." — Mercurius Aulicus} What a picture of the times is here presented to us ! From the following it appears that doubts were entertained of the tidelity of the governor : " 28 Dec. 1643. This day we nndei-stood my Lord Grey had ordered the outing of Colonel Horseman out of Rockingham Castle, but the House of Commons having good assurance of his fidelitie thought good to order his continuance for the present. "2 Indeed during the early months of their tenure of Rockingham Castle, there seems, from the following extract, to have been considerable dissension amongst the Roundhead officers concerning the governorship. " A Letter from Captain Horseman, Governor of Rockingham Castle, to Sir Gilbert Pickering, of the Ninth March, touching his being arrested by the Marshal of the Lord Grey's Brigade, and summoned, by a Wai-rant under the Hand of Isaac Dorisla, Advocate to his Excellency's Army : The Letter was read : The Warrant was read, And an Order of the House of Commons of December 23 made concei-ning Captain Horseman's continuing Governor of Rockingham Castle : and the Copy of a Letter from Colonel Wayte to the Lord Grey, were both Read. . . Ordered that the Whole Business concerning the Governor and Government of Rockingham Castle ; Colonel Wayte, the County of Rutland, and the Lord Grey, be referred to the Consideration of the Committee for Leicestershire Business, appointed on Saturday, January 20th, 1643(4), to comjiose all diffei'ences if they can; or otherwise to report to the House ; and that the Lord General be desired that all Proceedings by the Council of War against the Governor of Rockingham Castle, in the mean time be staid."'^ Both parties relied much upon their cavalry, and we find in the following extracts 1 King's Pamphlets in British Museum. 2 King's Pamphlets. 3 Journals of House of Commons, 1643. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 69 evidence of the care taken for that branch. We see Colonel Horseman still in command. " Jany 20, 1644. Acknowledgement (signed Robert Horseman) that 25 quarters of oats and five horses belonging to Mr. Barker of Hambleton were taken to Rockingham Castle " for the service of the King and Parliament," " by- virtue of a warrant from Lord Grey of Groby." (First Report of Royal Com. on MSS.) "25th May, 1644. To write to the Committee at Northampton to send to Rockingham so many of their horses as can be spared."^ In the year which witnessed the death blow given to the Royal cause both parties appear to have been exceedingly active in Northamptonshire. Thus, early in June, 1645, we read in Mercurius Civicus, " Sir John Noi-wich the governor of Rockingham Castle conceiving that Burleigh House was not tenable, commanded our forces to draw off with their ordnance, arms and amunition to Rockingham, which accordingly they have done, and fii/ed the house at their departure."^ And in The Exchange InieUigcnccr for 5th June, 1645, it is stated that " Sii- John Norris (Norwich) governor of Rockingham Castle in Northamptonshire, hath taken many of the King's Life Guards and of the Queen's regiment, and forced the rest to flight. "2 We get some idea of the King's movements during the fortnight preceding the battle of Naseby from the following account written at Northampton.^ "Upon Tuesday, June 3rd, the King's horse advanced southwai-ds, and kcjjt his general rendezvous at Newton, five miles on this side Leicester ; on Wednesday lie removed to Kibworth, five miles from Harborough; and on Thursday morning (the 5th), his horse came to Maidwell, eight miles from Northampton; and in the afternoon they came to Brixworth and othci- adjacent towns: and sent out their wari'ants all over the north-east parts of the county, and taxed eveiy town, some at £100, some at £200, some less and some more, upon penalty of being pluiidei'ed of their goods, and their houses fired, and by this means they have gathered great sums of money: and some of the towns having paid the sum first .set, another company comes and chargeth them again at a second, and after that a third, and all have been enforced to be paid. On Thursday night, about eight o'clock, a party of their horse came within two miles of Northampton. We took that day divers pi'isoners, who all agree that the whole body of horse and foot were drawing up this way, which gave us timely alarm. On Friday and Saturday they continue their taxing of the country towns, and their horses lie in several ])Iaces in great bodies to collect tlieir tax, we daily take of their men in towns, and our troopers skirmish with them. Sir John Norwich, governor of Rockiugliam Castle, hath sent out his troops daily, Avho have taken many prisoners, he sent thirty at 1 Cal. Domestic Papers, 1644. 2 King's Pamphlets, British Museum. 70 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. one time to be kept here (Northampton ?) On Saturday, 7th, the King with all his foot and carriages marched from Harborough to Daventry in Northamptonshire."^ A glimpse of the internal economy of the Castle, during the time it was held by the parliamentary troops, is fui'nished by the following, fi'om the Calendar of State Papers, 1650 : " Certified by R. Massey, that it appears by the accounts of Wm. Tompson, late tren surer at Rockingham Castle, during the time Sir John Norwich was governor, exhibited before the late Committee of Account, county Northampton, that Major Wm. Butcher was in actual service under the said governor in the Castle, from 19 July, 1645, to 9 May, 1646, that he received £48 8 1 as his pay, and that there is due to him as major on half-pay, £298 1 lld."2 The prolonged presence of the garrison in the Castle, their foraging expeditions, and the frequent attacks by the Royalists, caused terrible destruction in the neighbourhood of the Castle. The various governors found it necessaiy for stT'ategical and other reasons, to cut down or top all the trees, and to remove all the buildings in the vicinity of the Castle, which might afford cover to an attacking party. Thus Sir John Norwich not only pulled down the almshouse for four poor men (see p. 31), and the building which had been used as a prison for poachers (see p. 38), but also many cottages, and — can it be credited — the Church, because they presented favourable shelter to the opposite party ! In this way damage to the extent of several thousand pounds was done immediately outside the fortifications. One very deplorable result of the capture of the Castle is the irretrievable loss of many valuable papers. Traces of the entrenchments made by both parties are still visible in various directions around the Castle, and many oak and other trees may still be seen in the Park, which were evidently 23ollarded long since. In a " Particular " drawn up by Sir Lewis Watson in 1646, of his losses by the Parliamentary forces before sequestration, are the following curious items : "54 Warpes of habberdine ... ... ... 426 guilt voiders Venice glasses | 10 0 0 and other things in a closett ) " A Cabbinett wherein was a box \ of Massy gold w^^ other Jewills [ ... ... 100 0 0 in it to the value of ' " 10 ffeather bedds, 8 Matterices, 6 pillowes, 8 BouLsters, 16 Blanketts & 17 Coverletts." The Roundheads do not appear to have been very fastidious in their 1 King's Pamjihlets, British Museum. 2 Cal. of State Papers, 1650. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 71 plundering. Probablj^, some of the oflBcers, besides the cabinet, &c., mentioned above, appropriated the 36 jiictures, the dozen " Turkey worke Cushions," the t-wo dozen and a half " New damaske Chaii"es," the two dozen " Turkey worke Chaires," and the " 28 damaske stooles," and they no doubt heljjed to drink the " 10 y)ypes and 36 hogsheades of sti'onge beere," and, as a morning " pick me up," probably they took, now and then, a drauglit from the "eleaven hogesheades of ordinary beere." But one wonders who cared to ti'ouble himself with the " Jacke to turn the Spitte," or the " thi-ee ii'on gi'atcs," or with the "kitchen gi^ate one fier shouell and one fiere forke one diippinge pann and Andirons," or the "six potthookes and 4 spittes." Some one took the " warmeinge p.ann " and three indispensable vessels, valued together at the same sum as a hog.shead of old ale, namely at 13s. 4d. The garrison appear to have kept up a supply of ale, for they used the whole of " nineteen quarter and seaven strikes of malte," but they evidently did not intend any brewing should be done in the Castle after their departure, for they stripped the brew-house of the copper, of " one Cooler Loaded, 5 ffatts 3 tubbes and other thinges." Indeed, they must nearly have stripped the Castle. Not much furniture could have been left, for we find that, besides the chairs, &c., already mentioned, they took 14 tables, 23 bedsteads, 10 cupboards, 2 "fformes," 14 "stooles," 4 leather "chares," and 12 "stooles suitable," 6 great chests, 3 great presses, and an immense numbei- of other articles. The pillage and destruction outside the Castle wei-e on a scale equally extensive. Com of all kinds, hay, timber, coals, all disappeared. The total value of all the items enumerated in the long list from which the above are taken, is estimated at £3,903 10s. Od. Sir Lewis estimates the damage done by Sir John Norwich, by pulling down the " Chancel], Steeple, Chappies, and monuments " in the church at Rockingham, ^ in 1645, at one thousand pounds ; the pulling down, the same year, of the alms- house for four poor peo^ile at one hundred and fifty pounds, " Eleaven cottages with out-houses belonging to them," also, pulled down in 1645, are valued at three hundred pounds ; and " one greate Barne, 2 Stables a Coach house Slaughter Howse and other Howses," at one hundi-ed and thii-ty pounds. The " prison house demolished and lumber taken away," in 1643, is appraised at twenty pounds. The same year the garrison threw down and took away " divers ffence walls of stone," to the value of another twenty pounds. They were no doubt too useful to the Royalists. The " Spoile and defaceing of the Parke Lodge "2 is estimated at 1 1 See uotc oil Monumuut, )). 46, nud note I. RockiugUam Church, 2 See Chapter 3. 72 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. £13 6s. 8cl. ; and the "defaceing" of the house at Wilsford, with other damage there, at one hundred pounds. After the King had surrendered himself to the Scots, the Parliament appears to have thought so strong a garrison at Rockingham unnecessary, and accordingly it was resolved : " That the Horse belonging to Rockingham Castle be forthwith disbanded . . . That during such Time as the Castle of Rockingham shall continue a Oan-ison the Charge thereof be borne, and paid by the three Coiinties of Northampton, Leicester, and Rutland Equally to be laid upon each County. Ordered, That it be referred to the Committee of Northampton to slight the "Works about Rockingham Castle, in the County of Northampton, and forthwith to make it untenable."^ This was accordingly done, and the strong keep was thrown down, and the debris cast into Leland's "mighty diche;" and in the place it once occupied we now see the lovely I'ose garden. We can imagine the feelings of Sir Lewis as, from time to time, intelligence I'eached him at Oxford, of what was going on at Rockingham. His wife, with her family, seems to have lived at his brother's house, at Stoke Park, during the time of his banishment from the Castle, and she doubtless kept him well informed of what was passing. To him we will now turn our attention. During the early months of his stay at Oxford, he seems to have been a sort of state prisoner, waiting an opportunity to clear himself from the charges made against him. Amongst the Rockingham Papers is the following exceedingly interesting document, evidently in Sir Lewis' own hand-wi'iting. It appears to be a memorandum for the guidance of some one who was to bring his case before the King, or some other influential person. " The first thing which in order you are to consider is the Attestation of M'" Duport Secretary to General Hastings (now Lo : Loughboz'ough) by which it appears that his Ma*y was petitioned by me and that by that petition Secretary Nicholas was appointed to write to General Hastings as in the Letter is expressed, whereof this I send you is a true copy, and is the same which Duport delivered unto me to be sent to Colonell S'' Charles Cavendish who during my Imprisonment at Ashby had plundered fourteen score sheep of mine at Willford in Lincolnshire, about the same time that my Lo : Campden's forces took four hundred sheep and fourteen Bullocks from Rockingham. This hard usage occasioned a second complaint to his Ma*y (expecting nothing less (if not tymly prevented) than utter destruction) Uppon this his Ma*y was pleased by a warrant under his own hand 1 Journals of House of Commons, 3 July, 1646. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 73 to com'and my removal to Oxford, a Copy whereof I also send you herewith, and is for your better understandinfr to be perused in the second place. My coming to Oxford was when his Ma'^y was at the Siege of Glocester, from whence he was no sooner returned, than receiting all the former Passages I petitioned to be heard and to I'eceive my Triall and accusation. Hereunto I received a Reference dated 17 Aug: 1643 to the right Honorable the Lord Com'issioners, which also you shall receive herewith to follow in the third place. At the day of hearing M"" Secretary Nicholas took up the Charge, and alledged divers Particulars as, first that I refused to take M'^ Neville into the Castle when He and his Forces offered to stand with me in the defence of it. 2'^^^ That I did iuvite the Pailiaraentary Forces to come take it, and that my Wife did Lead in my Lord Gray by the hand. 3^^ That I should have divers Conferences with S'' R: S' John at a place called dissembling Lane near Brigstock Park, and all for the delivering up the Castle. 4'*^ that divers Lords and Gentlemen of Northamptonshire had offered to asist me in the defence of the Castle as well as M"" Nevill, and that I had given a deniall to them all, some thinges els was aledged, of which and the rest I was appointed by the Lordes to receive a Copy from M'' Secretary and to make answer another day, which day is so farr of, that I could never yet (allouding to that ordei') receive a Copy of these Articles neither know my Accusers, though 1 often sued for satisfaction therein. Nor can recover one penniworth of my Plate, money or Household stuff at Bclvoir, or of my Sheep and Beasts (as above said) taken from other places to the value of two or three and twenty hundred pounds. What my Loses have bin by the Garrison at the Castle, your Self can wittncss witli me being you know what you want. As all sorts of Corne and other provisions for howskeeping for at least half a year beforehand. 40'^ Hogshead of Beer, Beef, Fish, Bacon, Waren of Conies, Park of Deer all made use of by them, besides householdstuff, and two hundred loads of Hay, at the Least, standing in the pasture grounds about the House, which grounds together with the Meadows amounting to 40'''^ acres, They have for this two summers eaten and converted to their owne use. But above all is the spoile of my dwelling House and Gardens, which you know is but Lately, that I made fitt with a great deale of Cost, though that be not so much as the utter defaceing the Seate of the House, by Cutting downe so many goodly great Ashes, of Age not to be guessed at, and of valew so much the moie as that they cannot be had againe Standing as they did for nere so much money and were worth to be sold one thousand pounds. Besides all this (if it be true which I hear) my Estate is sequestered in all other places, little of my Rents having bin paid, but all behind for this two yeares and half. Good God give us patience. 74 ROCONGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. " I had allmost forgotten two years woole amounting to 20*y score or thereabouts (Redshaw knows the certainty) besides fifty pounds of Hay and Coale taken and caried away by the Forces of the Duke of Manchester from my Howse at Wilsforde."! By what proofs Sir Lewis cleared himself from the serious charges made against him cannot unfortunately be discovered. The author has searched in vain amongst the documents at the Record Office, and the manuscripts, &c., in the British Museum, and has caused inquiries to be made in the Bodleian Library, and other places for any documents which could throw light upon the subject. Gardiner, in his history of the Civil War, states that the King's Privy Council, preparing to treat for the surrender of Oxford, burnt all the records of the Oxford Parliament. In this holocaust of documents doubtless perished not only the letters and petitions to which Sir Lewis refers in the above memorandum, but also the i-eport of his trial and acquittal. That he cleared himself most honourably from every charge is manifest. Indeed the King seems to have been touched by his unmerited sufferings, for, as a mark of his confidence in his loyalty, he, in January, 1644, elevated him to the peerage with the title of Baron Rockingham, of Rockingham Castle. In the Bodleian Library is preserved a list of fees paid by Lord Rockingham, on the occasion of his creation. As this is of interest to the antiquary, it is given amongst the notes. ^ Owing to the destruction of the records of the Oxford Parliament, we have no knowledge of the part which Lord Rockingham took in its deliberations. His intimate acquaintance with the county would make his advice on local matters exceedingly valuable. Oxford surrendered to General Fairfax on the 24th June, 1646, upon terms certainly generous towards the garrison. The following is a copy of the general's "pass" for Lord Rockingham. " Sir Thomas Fairfax Knight Generall of the forces raised by the Parliament. Suffer the bearer hereof Lewis Lord Rockingham who was in the City and Garrison of Oxford, at the Surrender Thereof, and is to haue the full benefit of the Articles agreed unto vpon the Surrender, quietly and without let or interruption, to passe your Guards with his Servants, Horses, Armes, Goods, and all other necessaries, and to repaire unto London or elsewhere upon his necessary occasions And in all Places where he shall reside, or whereto he shall remove to be protected from any Violence to his Person, Goods, or Estate, according to the said Articles, & to have full Liberty at any time within six Months to goe to any convenient Port, and to 1 Rockingham Papers. 2 Xntc F. Fees due to liis Mut.vs servants upon crenc'on iif the Lo : Rockingham. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 75 Tra'sport himselfe with his Servants, Goods, and Necessaries beyond the Seas, And in all other things to enjoy the Benefit of the said Articles. " To all Officers and Soldiers under my command and to all others whom it may concerne. Hereunto due obedience is to be given, as they will answer the contrary. " Given under my Hand and Seale the 22 Day of June, 1646. "T. Fairfax." Sir Edward Watson's pass, dated two days later, on the very day of the surrender, is in similar terms, and the two brothers appear to have returned together to Stoke Park. There is no evidence of Lord Rockingham's I'e-establishment at the Castle until the following year, 1647, in October of wliicli year he made his last will there. The " delinquent " gentlemen of property were given the choice of leaving the kingdom within six months, or of compounding for their estates at one-tenth of their estimated value. Lord Rockingliam decided to remain in England, and to compound. Accordingly, we find amongst the Royalist Composition Papers, the following petition : " To the Hon*''^ Com'ittee for Compositions sitting at Goldsmith's Hall. "The humble pet' of Sir Lewis Watson, of Rockingham, Knight. " Their Pef humbly sheweth " That he being carried Prisoner to y^ Gamson at Ashby there held against y'' Houses of Parliament and from thence removed to Oxford Being there, about a year and halfe since, had the Title of Bai-on conferred u|)on him, and afterwards did sitt in y^ Assembly att Oxford and did there contribute to y*^ maintenance of that Garrison. " That y'' Pef^® estate is sequestered for his delinquancy against the Parliament of England. "Yo"" Pef therefore humbly praieth this Hon'^'^ Com'ittee to admitt him to favorable Composic'on And in the meane tyme bee receaved. & his name entred as a Compounder in pursuance of y^ said Articles. " And yo'" Pef shall praye &c " Lewis Watson." This petition was granted as the following extract shews: " Lewis Watson of Rockingham in the County of Northampton Knight. " His delinquency that he deserted his dwelling and went to Oxford and lined in that Garrison while it was holden against the Parliament and contributed towards the maintenance of those fforces raised against the Parliam' and was there in Oxford at the tyme of the Surrender and is to have the benefit of those Articles 76 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. as by Sir Thomas Fairfax Certificate of the 22 of June doth appeare, he hath neither taken the negative oath nor Couenant but prajes to be exempted upon the said Articles and vote of the house of Com'ons pursuant" &c. According to this document Lord Rockingham had furnished a " particular," in vv'hich he returned the annual value of his estates, with debts due to him, at nearly four thousand pounds, and a fine of £4,312 was imposed upon him. This was duly paid; but his troubles as a "compounder" were not to end here, it was the rule of the Commissioners to give a percentage to any one who proved a " delinquent " had understated his income. Needy neighbours, accordingly, at once set to work to ferret out such further delinquency on the part of Lord Rockingham. One Captain Stephen Tory seems to have stuck to him like a leech ; and notwithstanding, that Lord Rockingham endeavoured to forestall these informers, by furnishing the commissioners with timely "additions" to his former " particular as of his own discovery," he was condemned in several additional sums which brought his fine up to a total of about £5,000. The pertinacious Stephen Tory obtained £111 6s. 7d. as his share of this additional plunder.^ The correspondence respecting this compounder occupies many folios of the Royalist Composition Papers. In one of them Lord Rockingham prays he may be no more " molested " upon Stephen Tory's account. It is pleasing to note that, while one " Snooke " and other seemingly evil disposed neighbours at Great Easton were prompt to give evidence against Lord Rockingham, the names of many of his old faithful servants are found in these papers as witnesses in support of him. These papers furnish many interesting particulars of the estates, &c., of the wealthy supporters of_]the King. Lord Rockingham does not appear to have ever thoroughly recovered his elasticity of spirits. The murder of the King must have been a great shock to him. He never entirely submitted to the new order of things, and was consequently an object of suspicion to the temporary masters of the state. The Council of State ordered all malignants to report themselves to the ministers of their respective parishes. In the register at Stoke Albany is the following enti-y : " A Record to be kept in y® Parish of Stoke Albany for the purpose appoynted by y^ Act of Parleiment bearing date feb : 26. 1649 entituled : an Act for y^ remoueing all Papists and all Officers and Souldiers of fortune and other delinquents fro' London and Westminster &c. " Mem-i that uppon y" first day of April 1650 S"* Edward Watson of Stoake Parke in y^ parish of Stoake Albany p'sented himself and gave in his true name in 1 Rockingham Papers. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 77 writing to us Thomas Balgay Minister of Stoake Albany aforesayd, & John Ward Constable of y'' sayd towne according to y^ appoyntment of y^ abovenientioned Act of Parleiment in y' case."^ Sir Edward seems also to have "taken the national Covenaiite ;"2 but Lord Rockingham, as stated in the extract from the Royalist Composition Papers given above, took neither the oath nor the covenant. And there is no trace in the Rockingham register of his having complied with the order requiring him to report himself — serious and suspicious omissions no doubt, in the eyes of the Council of State. Amongst the Rockingham Papers is the following letter, wliicli shews how little he was ti-usted. Tiie reader will remember that at the date of this letter, the rising master spirit of the age, Oliver Cromwell, was in Scotland, watching the movements of the young King and his supporters there ; and the Council of State seem to have feared that the old Royalists would embrace the opportunity to rise in favour of Charles II. "ffor my honored Cosin the L'^ of Rockingham These " Sr " Haueing receued instructions from the counsell of state an aspeciall order from the commissioners of the Militia for this count3% for the disarming and securing both of the persons, and hoi'ses, of those disafected to the present goernmeut; Now S^' you beeing in my List nominated to bee one, and beeing my duty to be faithful to the state yett desirous to shew myselfe civill to your L''ship : I have sent an officer in whom I repose trust to put in execution y® sayd order from whom you shall I'cceive y* ciuill respect as if I were present, and therefox's desire y' hee may search with out disturbance y' 1 may faithfully perform the trust imposed on mee S'' This is all I have to treble you with save y' I take leave to underwrite my Selfe " Your L'^shipp's affectionate Cosin and Servant " Thqs Brooke."3 " Oakley mag' 8 Decemb' 1650." 1 Sir Edward's frieud, Mr. Couyern Griffin, gave in his name to the same authorities the next day. 2 See Rockinghnm Papers. 3 Bocltinghain Papers. 78 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. The tie existing between tlie two families evidently made this duty painful to Mr. Brooke, although he was enabled to execute it in a manner less offensive to his cousin, than a stranger might have done. The difficulties between Lord Rockingham and the State upon the compounding question were still causing him trouble, and only terminated with the spring of the next year. We may infer from the following letter, preserved in the Bodleian Library, that he was settling down again in tolerable quietude at Rockingham in the autumn of 1651, although from the allusion towai^ds the end of the letter, he does not even then aj^pear to be quite free from apprehension that his liberty of action may still be interfered with by the authorities. " Sonne, " You have done me a speciall Favour in sending this Bearer. Wee All Here wer in an extrem Longing to hear from you. How you wer There, and how you got through your Jorney. The Reason of our not sending, was the Hope I had fi'om the Keepers of accompanying my Letter with some good Venson, which held me in expectation ten dais at the Least, and being at Length performed 1 desii'e to have my Service to Sir Edward and my Lady, with much HapjDines to all the rest of the good Company. Frauk^ takes your Remembrance of hir very Kindly, and so do I. That you wish so hartely for a meeting with us at London, where I intend (God willing) to be within a few days after the first of November : if 1 be not prevented you know by what means. So I pray God to bless you and my daughter resting. " Your Affectionate Father "24 Oct. 1651. "Rockingham. " For my very good Sonne "Mr. Edward Barkham Esqr2 " This, at Walton." Whether Lord Rockingham was allowed to make his purposed journey to London, we do not know. The anxieties of the last ten years of his life were calculated to try the most vigorous constitution. He died 5th January, 1652(.3), and was, in compliance with his directions, buried in Rockingham Church, but there is no memorial there, of any kind, to his memory, except the registry of his burial, which is the only entry in the parish register for that year. The last of his three portraits, that in the gallery of the Castle, representing him in buff, was probably painted by Mi eha o l Wr igJit sometime after his return 1 Probabl3' his daughter Frances, maiTied to Edward Dingly, of Charlton, in Worcestershire. 2 Afterwards Sir Edward Barkham, of Wastacre, co. Norfolk, married to Lord Rockingham's eldest daughter, Grace. Sii: Ltwis Watson, 1''iksi' 1}ai!(in Rockingham. cm. hrrnO. Pagk 78. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 79 to Rockingham. What a change his troubles wrought in his appearance ! In this portrait, he is represented as an aged gentleman, with scarcely a feature of the two earlier portraits recognizable. The bright intelligence of the eyes alone remains. His countenance ajopears to have gained a stronger resemblance to that of his grandfather, as it lost the features shewn in his earlier portraits. The season of adversity through which he had passed was enough to imbitter the most amiable disposition. In addition to the terrible destruction of his property, the church demolished, cottages and other buildings destroyed, the valuable timber cut down, the pleasure grounds ruined, he had the mortification of losing, by the Royalists and Parliamentarians together, money, plate, jewels, &c., to the value of nearly twelve thousand pounds ; besides his contributions in support of the royalist garrison at Oxford. His last will is dated 19th October, 1647. In it he makes this pathetic allusion to the desecration of the burial place of his ancestors : " And I will that my Body be buried in the Chancel within the Parish Church of Rockingham, wherein my Father and Grandfather doe lye buried, in such decent manner as my E.Kecutors hereafter named .shall think fitt. Not doubting but that Place, though it have Lately undergon the rude Treatment of a rash hand, yet that in due Tynie, by God's good Blessing, either by my Selfe or soon (some ?) of mine, the same may come to be rebuilt againe." He gives to each of his six daughters a marriage portion (or portions on attaining their majority) of three thousand pounds ; — to be forfeited if they marry without their mother's consent. His wife (if she remains unmai-ried), was to have the use of the Castle the Park and Lodge, &c., until his heir attained his 21st year.^ "Item I do give to my wife all the Jewels which were hir owno before I mai'ried hir, and which were not my first Wives ; and I give hir my Coach and Coach horses, and four of my Hackney Geldings " . . . " Item 1 do give to my Brother, Sir Edward Watson, the best Horse 1 have, to be taken at his Choice and Election" . . . "Item I do give to my Sister the Lady Vaughan (being all the Sisters I have Living) a Cup of Ten Pounds " . . . " Item I do pfive all other my Jewells of what sort soever, as also all the little plate and Furniture of my Howses, that these unhappy Tymes have left and not taken from me, as Hangings Linnen and other household-stuff and utensills of Household whatsoever, to my sonne Edward Watson." Upon this same son Edward devolved the whole of his estates. His executors were his " dearly Beloved Wife Dame 1 Lady Rockingham's jointure house was Easton Park. 80 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. Elenor Rockingham," and his " wellbeloved Brother S'' Edward Watson of Stoke Park." The will occupies exactly four pages of large folio paper, and the codicil, referring to later purchases bequeathed to his son Edward, occupies a quarter page. The whole is written on one side of the paper only, and is entirely in the hand-writing of Lord Rockingham. The witnesses were Jonathan Cox, Clerk, Edward Bradshaw, Watson Bradshaw, and Richard Almond. Probate was granted to the heir 14th May, 1653. His brother Edward survived him five years. He died at Stoke Park the last week in January, and was buried by the side of his brother in Rockingham Church, on the 2nd February, 1658. During his life he was a helper and comforter to his brother, and since his death he has been a will-o-the-wisp to genealogists and to writers of magazine ai'ticles. Of his once fine house at Stoke Park nothing remains.^ The only "footprints" he has left "on the sands of time" are the registers of his baptism and burial ; his matriculation at Magdalen College, the records of his knighthood, and of his compounding for his estates, and the presence of his name in wills, and many other legal documents connected with his own and his brother's affairs. His will is dated IGth March, 1657. He bequeathed £20 towards the building of a Steeple to the " New Church at Rockingham," and more than £30 to the poor of Rockingham, Stoke, and six other parishes. To his dear sister, the Lady Rockingham, £10. "To my neece and Goddaughter M" Grace Barkham £100," and to his four other " neeces Mrs. Dimock, Anne, ffrances, and Elizabeth Watson £100 a peece." The absence of Katharine's name is sufficient proof that she did not survive until 1660, as stated on the tablet to her memory, (vid. infra.) To his " Loveing Nephew Sir John Norwich " he gives the £20 the latter had borrowed of him. This looks as if the breach between the two families was healing. After several bequests to other relatives and to servants: "The rest and residue of my Goods Chatties and personal Estate whatsover I do hereby will devise and give unto my deere and Loveing Nephew the Right Hon'^'^ Edward Watson, Baron, commonly called Lord Rockingham, whom I make and ordayne sole executor of this my last Will and Testament." Probate was granted to Lord Rockingham 19th December, 1658. The mother-in-law of Lord Rockingham, the Lady Grace Manners, also fell ander the harrow of the Parliamentary Committee ; and the pertinacity with which they dragged a suspected Royalist about the compounding field, until they tore something out of him, is well illustrated by her case. 1 See Note G. Manorial possessions of the Watsons. ROCKmGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 81 In the sixth report of the Royal Commissioners on Historical MSS. is found the following " Petition of Lady Grace Manners to the House of Commons. In May 1642 she borrowed of S'^' Lewis "Watson, her son-in-law the sum of £2000, and was by him desired to pay the same to Mr. Lambert, and others, and accordingly so paid £1700, not knowing that she was doeing anything contrary to any ordinance of Parliament but now finding that she has offended because Sir Lewis is at Oxford, she is exceedingly sorry, and entreats compassion, as she is seventy two years of age and has constantly lived in the Parliamentary quarters, and has contributed 890£ for public service, and her house is now a garrison of Parliament, and so long as she lived thei'e, she received 300£ a year, but has since received nothing." " 28 May, Draft order for Lady Grace Manners to be excused on payement of 500£ for reduced officers." The above extract makes this ti-ansaction appear tolerably simple. But the following from the " Calendar of the Committee for Advancement of Money" shews us that it extended over some years, and that it must have been most harassing to so aged a lady : " 24 March 1646. Lady Grace Manners, Southampton Buildings, Gray's Inn Lane, London, and Ayleston, co. Leicester. Information that she has sent (so.) 2000£ to Sir Lewes Watson a delinquent now at Oxford, 1700£ being paid to Rob : Lambert, linendi'aper of Temple Bar, and 300£ remaining in her hands. "31st March, Assed at 300£. " 18 April Note that she shews aquittance for 320£. " 1 May 1650. Information that she gave the late Ki ug 1000£ the year before Leicester was taken by his foi'ces. " 22 May. The county commissioners for co. Leicester to take examinations and to send them up. " 24 ,, Information repeated stating that the money was sent to General Hastings, who was in arms at Ashby de la Zouch. " (same date) Order that she give in an answer to the charge. " ? May. She states that she is 77 years old, has always resided in Parliamentary Quarters, and never gave money or anything whatsover for the service of the late King. " 19th June 1650. On Statement that the County Commissioners of Nots have issued their warrants to bring in her rents, order that they sieze and secure her personal estate, and detain her rents in the tenants hands, but do not dispose of anything till further order. 82 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. " 5 July 1650. Witnesses to be examined, but slie allowed to take exception to any, and copies of the exceptions to be given to the Prosecutor. " 21 Aut. 1650. She accusing John Coates of tampering with the witnesses to swear against her, and then oifering to bring her clear for a sum of money, the exception is allowed, but she is to prove it, and have liberty to bring a farther exception. " 25 Oct : 1650. Order on full hearing of the case, that she is not within the ordinance of sequestration and that therefore she is to be discharged further attendance, and the seizure of her estate taken off." Thus for five years was this poor old lady harried for having paid her debts ! Worn out and wearied, Lady Maimers survived the settlement of this vexatious business only three months. Amongst the Rockingham Papers is preserved the following graphic account of her death bed. It is endorsed "My Lady's Words at her death," and on the other side '■ This concernes y'' Lady Rockingham." " M''^ Cartwright's Expression Concerning y*^ Lady Manners hir Coddicill." " Vpon friday the 14<^^ of March 1650(1) between ten and leven of the clock at night my Aunt Manners was taken with a Palsey, she lay as if she had been a sleep almost all that night, a bout seven of the clock the next morning she tooke me by the hand and said a great deale to me which I could not vnderstand, I asked her if she would have my Lord of Rutland sent for, she said no, my Lady of Rutland, she said no, my Lady Rockingham, she said no, my Lady Crow, she said no, then I asked her if she would have my Cousen Pierrepont sent for, she said I, I. I sent for him, before he came she said something of a box, M^'s Ryth fetched the box where her Jewels was, she let it stand upon her bed till my Cousen Pierrepont came, as soun as she saw him she looked very cherfully, and said something of an other box, then M.^^ Ryth fetched the box that had her will in it, she tooke it in her hand a gave it to my Cousen Pierrepont, and then made signes to hev the box where her Jewels was opened, when it was she offered to looke in itt, I then opened the papers as the lay lapt vp and held them to her, she tooke the pearle cheane, and the two pearle braclets and the three pendant pearls, and put them in one paper and held them towrds my Cousen Pierrepont. Mrs. Ryth asked her if my Lord of Rutland should have them, she said no, if my Lady of Rutland, she said no, my Lord Ross she said no, my Lady Rockingham she said I. "Katharine Cartwright. " I can witness the truth hereof " ElJZABETT RiTHE." ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 83 " I hold it fitt for the satisfaction of my Lord Rosse when he comes of age, or any other that may be interressed in ray lady Manners estate, that Mr. Pierrpont, Mr. Savill nor Mr. Gra (?) doe not deliver the pearls to y*' lady Rockingham without a Bill in Equity where these witnesses may be examined upon oath. "Will Ellys."i Lady Rockingham survived her husband twenty-six years, residing chiefly at her dower house at Easton. She died 23x'd Octobei-, 1679, and was buried by the side of her husband on the 8th November. Her portrait by Michael Wright, in the Gallery at Rockingham Castle, shews us the features of a kind, motherly lady. Her dark hair is arranged in ringlets, in the style rendered familiar to us by Vandyke's portraits of Queen Henrietta Maria, and by Hollar's portraits about 1640. Of their six daughters only three married : Gi-ace married Sir Edward Bai'kham, of Westacre, in Norfolk. Frances married Edward Dingley, of Charlton, in Worcestershire. Eleanor married Sir Charles Dymock, of Scrivelsby, in Lincolnshire. The Dymocks have for many centuries held the hereditary office of King's Champion. They sprang from Robert de Marrayon, Lord of Fountney, in Normandy, temp. Will I. Of this nobleman the following legend is i-elated : Having expelled the nuns from Polesworthy, within his territory of Tamworth, he was, one night, warned by a vision of St. Edith, who appeared to him as a veiled nun with a crosier in her hand, that unless he restored the Abbey of Polesworth, he should liave an evil death, and go to liell. To impress this warning upon him she struck liim with the crosier, leaving a mark where the blow fell, and then vanished. The pain was so great that he cried out, and being advised to confess and restore the lands, be did so, when the pain ceased, and the mai'k of the blow disappeared I His son, Robert, iindeterred by his father's ])nnislnnent, appears to have entered upon a similar course of impiety, and to have furnishetl a practical illustration of the words of the Psalmist He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made ; " for it is recorded that he expelled the monks from the Priory at Coventry, turned their Priory into a fortification against the Earl of Chester, with whom he had a deadly feud. To make it the sti'onger lie dug deep ditches and covered them with turf. Riding out, he fell into one of these ditches himself, and a common soldier cut oif his head. Through the youngest of the four daughters of Philijj de Marmyon (temp. Henry III.), the championship passed to Sir John Dymock, who mariied her 1 Rockingham Papers. 84 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. granddaughter Margaret. The office was claimed by Sir Baldwin de Treville, descended from the second daughter of Philip de Marmyon, but was decided in favour of Sir John Dymock, in whose family the high honour has remained to the present day. Eleanor "Watson's husband, Sir Charles Dymock, filled the office of Champion at the Coronation of James II. Her third son, Charles, was Champion to William and Mary, and to Queen Anne, and her fourth son, named after his grandfather, Lewis, at the Coronation of George I. and George 11.^ At the Coronation of George IV., the Dymock being Rector of Scrivelsby and Prebend of Lincoln, deputed his son Henry to the office. Of the unmarried daughters: Elizabeth was buried at Rockingham, 1657(8), and Anne was buried in the same Church, Ilth December, 1697. The youngest daughter, Katherine, is distinguished as being the only member of the first Lord Rockingham's family to whose memory a record remains in Rockingham Church. On the floor of the Mortuary Chapel is a lozenge-shaj^ed slab, evidently comparatively modern, bearing this inscription : " Here Lyeth Katherine Youngest of Six Daughters to Lewis Lord Rockingham, Obiit June 26, 1660 Aged 13 years and 23 days by Eleanor Sister to John Earl of Rutland." Bridges, towards the end of the last century, copied the year " 1640." The Rockingham register says she was baptized 6th June, 1637, therefoi'e, neither of the above inscriptions gives the true year of her death if the age is correctly stated. The register is unfortunately, like most others, defective at the date 1650, but it is most probable she died in that year, in which case the age will coi-respond. There is no record of her burial, either in 1640 or in 1660. The point is of some interest because if she died, as the writer believes, in 1650, it proves that Lord Rockingham had himself commenced to rebuild the Church, and that it was, in 1650, sufficiently advanced to allow of her interment, and of the erection of a memorial to her. We have seen that she was not living at the date of her uncle, Sir Edward Watson's will, 1657, and that the new Church was then well advanced. Bridges, and the mason who cut the pi-esent inscription may each have found it impossible to decipher the partially obliterated inscription on the original slab, and so each has given us a hypothetical reading of an important figure. 1 The reader of Sir Walter Scott's " Redgauntlet," will rcraember the incident (founded upon tradition) of the lifting of the Champion's Pledge by an unknown female at the Coronation of George III. John Dymock was the Champion at this Coronation. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 85 It is hoped tliat the foregoing biogi'aphy of Sir Lewis Watson, first Baron Rockingham, unavoidably imperfect as it is, will have served to widen the historical horizon for the general reader, so far as it regards the period of the great Civil War ; and that it will have furnished matter, both interesting and wezt', for the genealogist and the antiquary. As the records of the succeeding generations of the Watsons are fairly accessible, it will be unnecessary, in the following chapters, to dwell so fully upon each life. Chapter Fifth. EDWARD, SECOND BARON ROCKINGHAM, And the Wentwokths; the Earls of Rockingham; the Viscounts Sondes; THE Marquises op Rockingham ; The Barons Sondes (Mon son- Watson, AND MiLLES) ; AND THE ROCKINGHAM WaTSONS. " There the most dainty paradise on ground Itself doth offer to the sober eye, In which all pleasures plenteously abound. And none does others happiness envy; The painted flowers, the trees upshooting high. The dales for shade, the hills for breathing space, The trembling groves, the crystal running by ; And that which all fair works doth most agrace The art, which all that wrought, appeareth in no place."— -BdmuTid Spenser. " Jock, when ye hae naething else to do, ye may be aye sticking in a tree ; it will be growing, Jock, when ye're sleeping." — Sir Walter Scott. DWARD, SiX'OND Baron Rockingham, of Rockingham Castle, succeeded to his father's estates in 1653, wlicn he was twenty-three years of age. The father had spent the last six years of his life, the years which followed his restoration to his beloved Rockingham, in labouring to restore to the home of his grandfather and father — to the home he had made his very own, some of the comfort and beauty of which the hand of the spoiler had robbed it. This work was taken up by his successor, and carried on by him with great ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 87 energy, throughout his retirement at Rockingham, during the seven years which elapsed before the Restoration of the Monarchy. The results of his building are seen in the continuation northwards, of the gallery, and the rooms beneath it ;i in the block extending westward from the curtain wall, now used as a laundry (on one of the gables of which is the date 1669), and in that building north of the gate-to wei-s, known as Walker's house. He pi'obably felt with Shenstone that " The works of a person who builds begin at once to decay, while those of him who plants begin at once to improve." And accordingly, some of the results of his judicious planting are seen in the noble avenues crowning the ridges of the heights to the right and left of the entrance drive, in that other fine avenue of lime trees, between the flower parterre and the kitchen garden, and in many parts of the New Park. We see in these buildings and plantings, a great similarity of taste in the father and son. Notwithstanding his secluded life, the second Lord Rockingham also fell under the suspicion of the fluctuating rulers of that time. During the brief reign of the resuscitated Long Parliament, under the date 30th July, 1659, Wliitelock records " Information of a new plot to bring in the King," and the next day, " Many persons were examined by the Council about a new Conspiricy, which was evidently proved," and that " the Council sat all Day and all Night for a good while together." In their panic they evidently felt they could not trust Loi'd Rockingham, and accordingly we find that on the " 16''^ Au*- 1659 The Council hearing that Rockingham Castle is strong and without a gai'rison, desire you to quarter in it a sufficient force of your soldiers to guard it from being taken by the enemy, (from President Vane to Major Boteler at Northampton. ")2 Happily, the dissensions between the Pai'liaraent and the Army delayed the execution of this order, and the expulsion of the Parliament, by Lambert, two months later, followed by the restoi-ation of the King in 1660, took away all apprehension of a second occupation of the Castle by parliamentary soldiers ; and from thenceforth, all dangex% alike to the Castle and its owners, was at an end ; and Edward Lord Rockingham, and his descendants continued, uninterruptedly, to develop the beauties of the Castle and the grounds, until they realize the description of the "Bower of Bliss," by Spenser, at the head of this chapter. On the restoration of the monarchy. Lord Rockingham hastened to welcome 1 This was most probably a rc-buibUnsr of pnrt of an enrUer erection, destroyed by the Parliamentarians, for in the old map already referred to, this jiortion of the (Jastlo is represented as extending to the cnrtain wall on the north. 2 Cal. State Papers, 1659. 88 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. the King, and was restored to various offices lield by liis ancestors, in connection with Rockingham Forest, &c. He regained the grant of the horse, and other fairs at Rockingham, and of the ancient fair at Kettering.^ He added to his estates by the acquisition of certain manorial rights at Ketteinng, and made extensive pui-chases of property in Sutton, Weston, Drayton, Wilbarston, Great Gidding, &c. On the re-assembling of the House of Lords, after its long suspension, Lord Rockingham took his seat and became a diligent attendant. His capacity for business was evidently recognised by his contemporaries. His name appears on a large number of committees. His attendances at the House were so unremitting during the years 1660 and 1661 that he could only have paid the briefest flying visits to Rockingham. After this his attendances became much less frequent. During the memorable year of the Great Plague, 1665, he attended no sitting, either at Westminster or Oxford. This year was marked in his family by the birth of his third son, Thomas, to be noticed hereafter. Daring the following year he was again assiduous in the discharge of his parliamentary duties ; but in 1669, he appears to have been busy with his improvements at Rockingham, and only visited the House six times ; nor does he seem to have gone very frequently to London during the following eight years ; but in 1678, the year of Oats' plot, he attended no less than seventy-eight sittings, but he was not present during the month of October. It is, no doubt, to his absence from the House at this time that allusion is made in the following letter, found amongst the Rockingham Papers. Although no year is given, it is evident, from the account of the " accusations against the Barle of crerrenton " (Lord Carrington, one of Bedloe's victims), that it was written in 1678. Unfortunately, only the writer's initials are given, and the first of these is very doubtful. Possibly some readers of this volume will be able, from the allusions contained in the letter, to identify both the writer and the recipient. " Southampton Place, Oct : 26. (1678 ?) " I receued yours this weake, and am mightily obliged to your Lp^ for the concerne you are pleased to have for my princess, I believe before this you will be inghtly informed concerning her, for I writ this day sennit to my Lady Vernor (or Vernon ?) and directed to M'"'^ Roopert, concluding shee would bee with you, and desired you to open it if shee was not, and I think I spoke something concerning her, but I am shure Mr. Pen writ to his cosen on tewesday last and he cleared that business concerning this princess. I wonder you should accuse mee 1 Rookingham Papers, and note G, Manorial Possessions of the Watsons. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 89 of conplimeiid you, for in the first place that is not to be don to you, and in the next I should doe my self a great ingary for I know I am the worst at it in the world. I read your Ij^^ compliments to Mor de Kennrie (?) and hee tels mee that hee is extremly pleased when hee receius a letter from you, but he would not give you the trouble often, but is very glad to heare you are very well, I eather see him at his owne house or at court every day, and when my Brother Ashley and hee visit I am the interpreter, hee concluds (?) hee shall stay here all this winter, and doubts not but hee shall see you before hee quits England, my Sister crafts is still at Saxton (?) shee is so well with her hand that I received a letter from her to day, hee sais hee will goe doune for her within thas few dais and will biing her up if shee will please for com, and I am confidend shee will not bee so hard hearted as for deny him, my Sister Ashley told mec shee would write too you to night if shee could, but shee bid me present you with her most humble service, pray be pleased to pi-eseiit mine most humbly to my Lady, and to my Godfather and his Lady and tell him that if I could have immagiued he would have bin so ill a patriot, I would have reproched him by every post both for my self and my Lord Keeper, who does it most hily, hee giving him warning of it so long agoe, and hee being the last now that is to be there and is not I desire hee will bring his stole (stool ?) a long with him, for if on com after nine (?) of the clocke there is no seat to be had in the house, for your uncle Staing all on morning till ten I was faine to sit upon tlie steps all that morning, and M"" Solissetur him self stood above an hour in the passige this day and could not get a place to sit, most part of this day was spent in our house in accusations against the Earle of crerrenton, and ther was a committy apointed to bring us an account on tousday of the former presedeuts of impeaching pears in our hous, M"" Ned Seymour was the furst that accused him and many others seconded him, severall of the heads were so hoi-red that I tremble to repete them, but since they most (must?) quickly com to publicke vcw (?) I will give you an account of som of them, first hee was accused to have advised the King too have desolved this ])arlimcnt and to have governd by his Army, and when hee was asked who should pay them hee aiiswered that they might live upon free quarter & plunder as his ffathers did at Oxford, then hee was accused of saing that the King was uncapable of gouerniug and that his Majesty was a papest in his heart, and a faveror of them, tliat his Lori't^ uscrpt the office of the tresuror, and all other great offices in the land, and that hee so underlet the custums (?) that hee hath thurty thousand pounds for himself, besids ten thousand pounds a year as long as their farmc lasted toowards the building of his house, that hee had four- tousande pounds for that Illegall Patent of the 90 ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. Canarycompaiiy, that he maniged this unlucky war, and that he mad this disadvantageous peace, iu tine that hee mad all the miscarriges since the King cam into England of all the three Kingdoms this will be the heads of the impeachment if hee cant cleare him self with out doubt hee will lose his life, I wish he may prove (as his childeren say) an honest man, with out doubt hee will a peare a very unwise man, in this accusation it has bin often said that hee was Treasurar, but there was a Gentilman said to day that your good ffather that is in heaven should complaine, that hee carrid only the Whit Staf, (?) my Lord Chancelor disposed of all the mony, but though it be not my tallent to speake in pablicke, yet I could not heare that worthy man ai'ained of such a last saing and stand silent, I told the house in short that that Gentilman was misinformed of my Uncle for hee was too wise and generos a person to beare the sine of an Ofice and let another execute it, and that I was sure that hee would wrather have quited his seat then liave keepe it upon thos termes. I told them also that Sir Phillip War (?) could answer this better than my self, the which he did immediately, and by this tim it is best to make an end of this long scribble, and to aske your pardon, hoping you will for give this and many other falts of freadom your Lp^ most affectionat obedient and faithful humble servant " P.S."i At the Coronation of Chai'les IL, Lord Rockingham claimed the right to be present at that ceremony, in his character of Master of the Royal Bxickhounds, but his claim was not allowed. He seems, however, in his quiet way, to have been somewhat of a courtier. In a letter from Sir Wm. Coventry to Lord Arlington, 1st August, 1665, preserved amongst the Public Records, is an account of a Progress of the Duke of York and his Duchess to Leicester. After giving an account of a panic, into which the party was thrown, at St. Albans, by the sudden illness of one of the Duke's pages ; when the inn-keeper, thinking it was the plague, was on the point of sending him, without permission, to the pest house ; and of the amusing pertinacity of Lord Banbury, who, in his eagerness to induce the Duke to breakfast at his house, grasped him so tightly by the leg, that he nearly "pulled off his shoe," and of his at last persuading the Duke and Duchess to partake of " Sweetmeats and Fruit," notwithstanding that Lady Banbury was .still too ill, from her confinement, to see them; the writer goes on to say " Their Highnesses have dined and been well treated at M'' Griffins" (at Dingley), "where came the Duke and Duchess of Buckingham, Lords Cardigan, Rockingham, Brudenell, the Attorney General, and other gentlemen of those parts." 1 Kiickiii;;hflin Tapers. ROCKINGHAM CASTLE AND THE WATSONS. 91 The very few manuscripts of the second Baron Rockingham, which have yet come to light, indicate that his education had been somewhat neglected; a natural consequence, perhaps, of the troubled times dui^ing which he grew to manhood. Amongst the Add : MSS. in the British Museum, is a letter from him to Lord Hatton, recommending one Bradshaw to his notice. In this letter the hand- wi'iting is atrocious, as is tlie case in the few of his business memoranda found at Rockingham Castle. On the 24th November, 1654, Lord Rockingham married Anne, eldest daughter of Thomas Wentworth, the unfortunate Earl of Strafford. The life and character of this nobleman have been so often given to the world, that it is unnecessary here to enter into details of them ; but the writer cannot forbear to express his opinion that, until quite I'ccently, no adequate effort has been made to clear his chai-acter from the odium cast upon it by pai'tisan writei'S. There is in the Gallery at Rockingham Castle, a fine ])ortrait of liim by Van Dyck, representing him in armour ; and in another room is a i"