Heralds By £. K D 3>£ Edited by the REV. PERCY DEARMER, D.D. Cf)e arts of tf)e (Biuret) Edited by the REV. PERCY DEARMER, D.D. i6mo. Profusely Illustrated. Cloth, 1/6 net. 1. THE ORNAMENTS OF THE MINISTERS. By the Rev. Percy Dearmer, D.D. 2. CHURCH BELLS. By H. B. Walters, M.A., F.S.A. 3. THE ARCHITECTURAL HIS= TORY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH. By A. G. Hill, M.A., F.S.A. 4. CHURCH MUSIC. By the Rev. Maurice F. Bell, M.A. 5. GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. By the Rev. E. Her- mitage Day, D.D., F.S.A. 6. RENAISSANCE ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. By the Rev. E. Hermitage Day, D.D., F.S.A. 7. SYMBOLISM OF THE SAINTS. By the Rev. P. H. Ditchfield, M.A., F.S.A. 8. THE CHANCEL AND THE ALTAR. By Harold C. King, M.A. 9. CHURCH EMBROIDERY. By Alice Dryden. 10. HERALDRY OF THE CHURCH. By the Rev. E. E. Dorling, M.A., F.S.A. OTHERS TO FOLLOW W&t arts of tfjc ©Ijurclj HERALDRY OF THE CHURCH A HANDBOOK FOR DECORATORS BY THE Rev. E. E. DORLING, M.A., F.S.A. WITH EIGHTT-TH%EE ILLUST7{JTI03^S A. R. MOWBRAY & CO. Ltd. London : 28 Margaret Street, Oxford Circus, W. Oxford : 9 High Street First printed, 191 1 EDITOR'S NOTE THE little volumes in the Arts of the Church series are intended to provide information in an interesting as well as an accurate form about the various arts which have clustered round the public worship of God in the Church of Christ. Though few have the oppor- tunity of knowing much about them, there are many who would like to possess the main outlines about those arts whose productions are so familiar to the Chris- tian, and so dear. The authors will write for the average intelligent man who has not had the time to study all these matters for himself ; and they will therefore avoid technicalities, while endeavouring at the same time to present the facts with a fidelity which will not, it is hoped, be unacceptable to the specialist. CONTENTS PAGE Arms of Sees in the Province of Canterbury 15 Arms of Sees in the Province of York - 71 Shields specially associated with the Holy Name - - - - - 93 The Four Evangelists - - - 105 Arms assigned to Saints - - - 115 Arms suggested for Saints - - - 157 Index - 193 &rts of tlje (ttijurdj Heraldry of the Church A Handbook for Decorators INTRODUCTION THIS little book is intended, as its sub-title implies, for the use of church decorators. It has been written, and illustrated by the writer, in the hope of inducing Church people of to-day to take a little more pains with the heraldry that is placed by them in painted windows and on carven stones, and of telling some- thing of what is implied by the use of heraldic ornament. With this aim, examples of the shields of arms that are most likely to be used B 2 Heraldry of the Church in the decoration of churches are here described in simple intelligible terms. The first part of the book is occupied with the arms of the dioceses of the Church of England ; the remainder of it comprises the shields, some devised in mediaeval times to typify certain of the saints, some designed by the writer to serve the same purpose for those saints whom the armorial writers of the middle ages omitted from their lists. It is hoped that this selection will be found useful and reasonably comprehen- sive. Though exigencies of space forbid the inclusion of all coats of arms that have been assigned to saints, there is here a shield for each saint in whose honour twenty churches and upwards have been dedicated in England. Of these by far the largest number, considerably over 2,000, have the Blessed Virgin as their patron saint. All Saints is the next most favoured dedication, more than 1,200 churches having this title. Then follow Introduction 3 S. Peter with over 900 ; and S. Andrew and S. Michael with more than 700 churches. Holy Trinity is the invocation of between 600 and 700 ; S. James, S. John the Evangelist and S. John Baptist give their names to over 500 churches. S. Ni- cholas follows with close on 400 ; Christ Church and S. Paul are the titles of nearly as many. S. Laurence, S. Mar- garet and S. Mary Magdalene respectively are the patron saints of over 200 churches, and between 100 and 200 are dedicated in honour of S. Bartholomew, S. George, S. Giles, S. Helen, S. Leonard, S. Luke, S. Mark, S. Martin, S. Matthew, S. Stephen and S. Thomas the Apostle. Holy Cross is the name of close on 100 churches ; S. Catherine, S. Cuthbert, and S. Saviour of nearly as many. Between 50 and 80 have the names of S. Augustine, S. Clement, S. Botolph, S. Oswald, S. Barnabas, S. Thomas of Canterbury and S. Anne. Ranging between 40 and 70 are the dedica- tions of churches in honour of Emmanuel, 4 Heraldry of the Church S. Chad, S. Philip, and S. Wilfrid ; while from 20 to 40 churches have the titles of S. Bridget (or S. Bride), S. David, S. Faith, S. Gregory, S. Hilda, S. Alban, S. Denys and S. Jude. This book makes no claim to be a manual of heraldry. The mysterious jargon of the science is, as far as possible, replaced by straightforward English which may be easily understood by readers ignorant of heraldic technicalities. It has been, of course, impossible entirely to avoid the use of technical terms ; but these will explain themselves when the descriptions in which they occur are com- pared with the drawings placed opposite to them. Heraldry is a matter which enters, and always has entered, very largely into the decoration of churches. Carvers in wood and stone, workers in metal and glass, painters, embroiderers and illuminators have all enriched our stores of heraldic art. But the heraldic art of the middle Introduction 5 ages is a very different thing from that of the last three hundred years. Even when to modern eyes the old examples seem crude and harsh it is impossible to deny their vigour and power ; when, as is most often the case, they attain to beauty their beauty is of a quality that must appeal to the modern craftsman who is trying to import into his own work something of the dignity and charm that distinguish the old. But for the most part the modern craftsman is trying to do nothing of the kind. Oblivious to what almost every old church has to teach him, he is content to reproduce the mistakes and the feeble- ness of other moderns as ignorant as himself. If he can be persuaded to study the old examples he copies and traces and measures them, not because he is too humble to try to work as the men of old time worked, trusting to a keen eye and a sure hand to give life and proportion and stateliness to his work, but because he is 6 Heraldry of the Church too idle to find out for himself the ways by which they reached to the success that is theirs. Let it be understood that I am speaking of heraldic work, and of that only. For the decorators of to-day can produce work that is every whit as fine in execution as that of the middle ages. It is their design that sadly needs improvement ; and the pity of it is that their patrons are satisfied with the poor stuff that issues every day from the workshops. When, as sometimes happens, the modern worker is neither humble nor idle, but merely a conceited and ignorant fellow who trusts to his own unaided genius to produce heraldic ornament, the result is usually ludicrous, and if it were not so fatuous would be distressing. What this little book aims at is to teach the decorator who is willing to learn that heraldry may be as beautiful to-day as ever it was ; that it may have distinction and grace and fitness akin to that of the Introduction 7 Middle Ages ; that if his work is to possess those qualities he must first study the armorial glass and the seals, the monu- ments and the illuminations of the olden time. If he will not do that, let him at least be guided by those who have gone for their inspiration to the work of the great periods. The question arises then — What are the elements of the beauty of ancient heraldic design ? I think they are three ; first, cleanness and firmness of line ; secondly, balance and proportion ; and lastly, splendour of colour. If modern work is to have the same beauty it must conform to the same rules. Let all your lines, then, be clean and firm and expressive. There must be no haziness or sketchiness of outline. You must get your effects with a strong sure stroke in which each touch of pen or chisel, needle or brush means something definite. Look at the leopards in the shield of Lincoln, page 43, or the cinqfoils 8 Heraldry of the Church in the arms of S. Davids, page 59. In the one case the simple drawing of the beasts attempts to show how roundness and strength and " go " may be expressed with economy of line ; in the other the cinqfoils placed on the cross seem, with- out being exactly formal and regular, to have their due value in the little scheme of decoration. Everyday experience shows only too plainly how qualities of that kind, which are the essence of ancient heraldic art, are lacking in most of the heraldry of to-day. The mediaeval armorists attained in an apparently instinctive and effortless manner to a quality of proportion which we can only reach after long and careful study of their draughtsmanship. Their secret ap- pears to be this ; that they made the amount of space covered by the charges rather less than the area of the field left visible. We, on the other hand, are apt either to make our charges far too small, when the shield looks poor and weak, or Introduction 9 too big, when it has a crowded and over- weighted appearance. Look at the Chester mitres, page 79, or at the birds in the shield of S. Thomas, page 153. In both instances there is some sort of balance between the charges and the field, and it may perhaps be claimed for each that the effect is lively and agreeable. The same sort of caution is necessary when dealing with large charges which have smaller objects upon them. S. George's cross, page 135, satisfies the eye, but it is considerably narrower than that of Carlisle, page 77, which must needs be wide be- cause of the mitre which it carries. Again, when a large charge is between smaller objects the same care must be exercised. Compare S. George's cross with that of Durham, page 75, and see how the latter is narrow to allow room for the four lions. Yet all three crosses are of sound heraldic type, the Carlisle cross being wide to allow the mitre to have its due effect in the scheme, that of Durham IO Heraldry of the Church being narrow to let the four lions do their share. Or compare the fesse in the arms of Oxford, page 49, with that of S. Barnabas, page 163. Each is a good fesse ; but the one is narrow because it has other charges above and below it, the other is wide because it has charges upon it. Beware of what are called "art colours. " If a thing is red, paint it red, a clear, bright, splendid scarlet. Do not use pink, or crimson, or terra-cotta. Hues such as those must be banished absolutely from the palette of the heraldic painter. For a blue thing use a clean and cool colour like Prussian blue. A hot, purply blue should be avoided. A vivid green of the colour of young spring grass is, in the same way, preferable to olive or emerald or bottle-green. The love of the mediaeval armorists for blue is noteworthy. The celestial colour is what we naturally expect to find in shields that typify the Blessed Virgin, Introduction such as the arms of Salisbury, of Lincoln, and the shield of Our Lady itself. But it appears also in the arms assigned to martyrs, such as S. Andrew, S. Clement, and S. Edmund ; in that of Edward the Confessor, of Hilda the abbess, of Guthlac the hermit. This fondness for blue is possibly a reflection of the devotion of the English Church for the Blessed Virgin, a devotion which is further exemplified in the enormous number of churches that are dedicated in honour of the Mother of our Lord. It remains to give some hints as to the drawing and placing of heraldic charges, and to explain a few technical terms. Swords should be so drawn as to look like real weapons, not like theatrical properties. Keys, when there is a pair of them (see Winchester, page 21) have a better appearance if their wards, which are always upwards, are of different patterns. When 1 2 Heraldry of the Church they are crossed that which is placed diagonally from top left to bottom right should be above the other. (See Glou- cester, page 37, and compare the croziers of LlandafF, page 45.) "Leopards" are lions walking and full- faced; "lions" are sidefaced and rampant. (See Lincoln, page 43, and Durham, page 75.) ^ The chief is the upper part of the shield. A chief is that same part cut off" by a horizontal line. The saltire is a difficult charge to draw satisfactorily, and it is well to get the four arms as nearly as possible of equal length and its upper and lower angles slightly less than right angles. Make your mitres of the simple early shape. Do not be lured into drawing the ugly bulbous objects which did duty for mitres in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Keep the angles of chevrons (see S. Botolph, page 165) somewhat acute. Introduction 13 A chevron with an obtuse angle is not a beautiful thing. All drapery should be expressed by simple lines. Shading by cross-hatching should not be attempted. (See Sodor and Man, page 89, and S. Matthew, page 107.) When a shield contains only three similar charges arranged two and one, the lowest of the three may be very slightly larger than the other two. (See S. Nicholas, page 1 83.) It is perhaps hardly necessary to explain that "gules " means red, " azure" is blue, " sable " stands for black, and " vert " is the heraldic name for green. It remains for me to express my great indebtedness to the monumental Ecclesias- tical Heraldry of the late Dr. Woodward, to Dr. Husenbeth's Emblems of Saints, to Mrs. Jameson's valuable works, Sacred and Legendary Art and their companions, Legends of the Monastic Orders and Legends of the Madonna, to the great Catalogue of Seals in the British Museum compiled by 14 Heraldry of the Church Dr. Walter de Gray Birch, and last but not least to Frances Arnold -Forster's Studies in Church Dedications. Without the aid which these writers have afforded me I could hardly have produced this little piece of work. If those who use it find it of any value and interest I shall be more than happy. E. E. D. ARMS OF SEES IN THE PROVINCE OF CANTERBURY 1 6 Heraldry of the Church Canterbury Azure an archbishop's crozier with its staff silver and its cross gold surmounted by a pall in its proper colours. Simon Islip (1349-66) was the first Archbishop of Canterbury who had these arms engraved upon his seal ; all his successors have employed them as the arms of the metropolitan see of England. The pall is white, edged and fringed with gold, and the four crosses upon it, which must have the shape drawn in the illustration opposite, are black. The arms of the See of Armagh are the same as those of Canterbury ; those of the Archbishopric of Dublin have five crosses on the pall, otherwise they are like those of Canterbury and Armagh. 1 8 Heraldry of the Church London Gules two swords gold of S. Paul crossed saltirewise with their points upwards. Ralph Stratford (1340-54) seems to have been the first Bishop of London to display these arms as those of the see, although several of his predecessors had introduced into their seals a figure of S. Paul, the patron saint of the cathedral and city, with his emblems of sword and book. After Bishop Stratford's time the use of the arms by Bishops of London became almost universal. The mediaeval heralds gave to S. Paul himself the same shield but with the swords silver. The Trovince of Canterbury 19 20 Heraldry of the Church Winchester Gules S. Peter s keys gold and stiver with S. Paul's sword thrust between them saltire- wise and having its blade silver and its hilt gold. This is the most usual form of these ancient arms, borne in memory of the saints in whose honour the cathedral is dedicated. The manner in which the charges are arranged has varied from time to time ; but the field is consistently coloured red ; the keys set back to back with their bows interlinked are always gold and silver ; and it is always the golden key which lies over the blade of the sword. The Trovince of Canterbury 21 22 Heraldry of the Church Bangor Gules a bend gold sprinkled with drops sable between two pierced molets silver. These are the colours used at present. In former days the bend was silver ; sometimes the drops were coloured blue. The red of the field is seen through the piercing of the molets. It is impossible to say what is the origin of these beautiful arms, or if they have any reference to the dedication of the cathedral or to a bishop of olden times. The seal of Bishop Roland Merrick (1559-66) is the earliest in the collection at the British Museum to show these arms impaling his own personal coat. The Trovince of Canterbury 23 BANGOR 2 4 Heraldry of the Church Bath and Wells Azure a saltire quartered saltiremse gold and silver. The arms are those of Wells, the seat of the bishop, the saltire being S. Andrew's cross in allusion to the dedication of the cathedral. The arms of Bath are not now used. The field is blue. Each arm of the saltire is divided lengthways into equal alternate strips of gold and silver, begin- ning with gold in the top left-hand corner. The gold is consequently above the divid- ing-line on the dexter side (that is the spectator's left), and below it on the sinister side of the saltire. \ The Trovince of Canterbury 25 26 Heraldry of the Church Birmingham Party indented gold and gules jive roundels with two crosses formy in the chief all counter- coloured. The field of these arms, divided by the zigzag line into two halves (that to the spectator's left being gold and the other side red), is derived from the ancient shield of the Berminghams, a powerful feudal family holding in the Middle Ages broad domains where the city now stands. The two crosses and the five roundels are added in memory of S. Philip in whose honour the cathedral church is dedicated. As the blazon indicates, these charges are countercoloured, that is those that are on the gold are red, and vice versa, the roundel in the foot of the shield where the zigzag line passes through it being itself partly red and partly gold. The meaning of these charges is ex- plained later under S. Philip, page 184. The Trovince of Canterbury 27 28 Heraldry of the Church Bristol Sable three crowns palewise gold. An early example of these arms has the field azure, and that is probably its original colour. When the field was blue there was a good reason for setting the crowns one under the other, for thereby this shield was distinguished from one of the many shields assigned to S. Edmund in which the golden crowns were arranged two and one. The date of the change of the colour of the field from blue to black is lost. It has been suggested that the three crowns refer to the dedication of the cathedral in honour of the Holy Trinity. The Trovince of Canterbury 29 30 Heraldry of the Church Chichester Azure our LORD clad in white with a golden girdle seated upon a throne gold and having a sword coming out of His mouth with its blade silver and its hilt gold. This design, evidently suggested by S. John's vision of our Lord in glory, appears in the seals of Sigefrid who ruled the see from 1 1 80 to 1204, and of Richard de la Wich and John Chipping,thirteenth-century Bishops of Chichester. In these seals, how- ever, the sword is omitted, and the figure is set between two candlesticks. The fifteenth- century seal of the dean and chapter omits the candlesticks, but has the sword. John Arundel, bishop from 1459 to 1477 was the first bishop to place the figure upon a shield as the arms of the see. The face of our Lord should be painted in its natural colours ; so should the hands and feet which show the wounds. The halo is gold with a red cross upon it. The throne may have a red cushion, and the footstool may be of the same colour. CHICHESTER 32 Heraldry of the Church Ely Gules three crowns gold. Bishop William de Luda is found using these arms as early as 1290. They are those assigned to S. Etheldreda, Queen of Northumbria and founder of the Abbey of Ely, in whose honour the cathedral church is dedicated. The reverse, Gold three crowns gules^ are the arms of S. Osyth, Queen of the East Saxons and founder of a nunnery at Chick in Essex, who was murdered by the Danes about the year 676. The Province of Canterbury ELY 34 Heraldry of the Church Exeter Gules a sword silver with its hilt gold sur- mounted by two keys gold crossed saltirewise. These arms assumed their present form in the episcopate of John Bopthe, Bishop of Exeter from 1465 to 1478. Edmund Lacy (1420-55) took two keys and a sword in saltire for the ai;ms of the see. Edmund Stafford, his predecessor, used two keys. The charges are borne in allusion to the ancient dedication of the cathedral to S. Peter and S. Paul. The Province of Canterbury 35 36 Heraldry of the Church Gloucester Azure two keys gold crossed saltiremse. The Abbey of Gloucester was under the protection of S. Peter, and the keys of the Apostle naturally appear in the blue shields of the monastic house and the see. When in later years the name of S. Paul was added to the dedication, S. Paul's sword was borne upright along with the keys, and is so engraved in the fifteenth-century seal of the abbey. The sword has, how- ever, been disused for a long time. The shield that the armorists of the Middle Ages assigned to S. Peter himself was Gules two crossed keys silver. The Province of Canterbury 37 38 Heraldry of the Church Hereford Gules three fleurs-de-lis coming out of leopards heads gold. This is the coat-armour of the powerful house of Cantilupe from which came Thomas de Cantilupe, Bishop of Hereford from 1275 to 1282. Adam Orlton, the next bishop but one after him, had two such fleurs-de-lis engraved in his seal, and after his time these arms came to be regarded as the arms of the see. The leopards' heads are usually drawn reversed, as in the illustration opposite, but there is good reason for believing that they are nothing more than a decorative elaboration of the ball or knop from which the leaves of the flowers spring. The earliest examples of the arms of Cantilupe show three golden fleurs-de-lis on red, and the seal of a fifteenth-century Bishop of Hereford gives them in the shield of the see with very large plain knops. But usage has decided that the knops shall be leopards' heads reversed, and it is as well, no doubt, to conform to the usual practice. The Province of Canterbury HEREFORD 4 o Heraldry of the Church Lichfield Party gules and silver a cross quadrate and potent between four crosses formy all counter coloured. No satisfactory explanation is known of these ancient and remarkable arms, which in the Middle Ages were devised for S. Chad, Bishop of Mercia, and patron of the cathedral. The shield is equally divided by the perpendicular line and coloured red and silver, the red being on the spectator's left hand. The large cross, similarly divided, is coloured red where it rests on the silver, and silver in its other half. The four small crosses are treated in the same way, those in the red half being silver while the two in the silver are red. The central cross is of unusual form. Its arms issue from a square and end in crutch-shaped pieces, whence its name " potent," from the French potence = a crutch. The Province of Canterbury 4i LICHFIELD 42 Heraldry of the Church Lincoln Gules two leopards gold and a chief azure with Our Lady enthroned with the Child all gold therein. These arms first appear in the seal of William Smith, Bishop of Lincoln from 1495 to 1 5 14. The lower part of the shield contains the traditional arms of the Dukes of Normandy in memory, it seems probable, of William the Conqueror, who in 1085 transferred the seat of the bishop of that vast diocese from Dorchester on the Thames to Lincoln. The figures in the chief refer to the dedication of the cathedral in honour of the Blessed Virgin. The Province of Canterbury LINCOLN 44 Heraldry of the Church Llandaff Sable two croziers crossed sajtirewise, the one gold, the other silver^ and a chief azure with three mitres gold therein. The golden crozier, laid diagonally with its head in the top left-hand corner of the black field, should pass over the other, which is all of silver. The three golden mitres in the blue chief shpuld be so arranged that with their pendent labels they occupy about half of the area of that upper part. This is not an easy shield to draw so that it presents a quite satis- factory appearance. The croziers especially require very careful treatment. They must be drawn boldly, even at the ex- pense of proportion, otherwise they will look very thin and make no show on their black background. The charges them- selves seem to have no special reference to the history of the see or to the dedica- tion of the cathedral. The Province of Canterbury 46 Heraldry of the Church Norwich Azure three mitres with their labels gold. These arms are found as early as 1 3 5 1 in the second seal of William Bateman, Bishop of Norwich from 1344 to 1355. Dr. Woodward {Ecclesiastical Heraldry \ :J p. 327) suggests that the" three mitres " may possibly refer to the union in the See of Norwich of the Bishoprics of Thetford, Dunwich, and Elmham." The Province of Canterbury NORWICH 48 Heraldry of the Church Oxford Sable a /esse silver between three ladies heads in the chief with their clothing silver and their crowns gold and an ox silver passing a ford in the foot. The lower portion of the shield contains the canting arms of the city ; the ford being represented by waved bars alter- nately silver and blue. The ladies' heads above the fess perhaps refer to S. Frides- wide, Abbess of Oxford and her two patron saints, S. Cecilia and S. Catherine. Dr. Woodward put forward the suggestion that the heads may be those of kings, referring to the tradition of the royal foundation of the University. The Province of Canterbury OXFORD 5