MM HANDBOOK OF THE PRACTICE AM ART Of BY DR. HERMANN VOGEL, TEACHER OF PHOTOGRAPHY AT THE ROYAL TECHNICAL ACADEMY AT BERLIN; PRESIDENT OF THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF PHOTOGRAPHY AT BERLIN ; EDITOR OF THE “ PIIOTOGRAPHISCHEN MITTHEILUNGEN MEMBER OF THE INTERNATIONAL JURY OF THE PARIS EXHIBITION OF 1867 ; HONORARY MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES. REVISED AND CORRECTED BY THE AUTHOR, AND ESPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE UNITED STATES. TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN BY EDWARD MOELLING. PHILADELPHIA: BENERMAN & WILSON, PUBLISHERS. 1871 . Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1871, By BENERMAN & WILSON, In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. CAXTON PRESS OF SHERMAN & CO. PREFACE TO THE GERMAN EDITION. Three years have elapsed since the first part of the work which has now reached its conclusion appeared before the public. Many things combined to retard its completion. Particularly the void which I found in our knowledge of Photo-Chemistry, Photographic Optics, Practice, and ^Esthetics. These very cir- cumstances cause in me the desire to attempt, so far as is in my power, to remedy this defect. I laid aside my pen, after a few sheets had been written, in order to carry on, for several months, experiments in chemistiy and optics, and investigations of a technical and aesthetic character. I had to create first the material for many chapters of this book before I could write them. I need only refer to my works on Sensitizers , on the Photo- Chemistry of Chlorine , Bromine , and Iodide of Silver , on their Changes in the Bath , on Silver Tritu- ration, on Collodion , on Microphotography , on Testing Object Glasses , on the Carbon Printing Process , on Photometry , on the Principles of Illumination, on the Construction of the Atelier, and on Perspective in Portrait Photography, not to mention many smaller publications ; and this must be my excuse for requiring so much time in laying my book before the public. On the other hand, I was frequently interrupted in ny labors. The International Exhibition of 1861 called me to Paris; the ex- pedition to observe the solar eclipse of 1868 called me to Aden, in Arabia ; the Photographic Archaeological Expedition of the same year required my presence in Upper Egypt. The manuscript of IV PREFACE TO THE GERMAN EDITION. ray book was my companion. Some chapters were written in Paris, others on the Red Sea; some on the Nile, and before the last sheet leaves the press, I follow the kind invitation of the American photographers and cross the Atlantic. The correction of the proof I had to leave to others. Many errors in printing and in the arrangement remained necessarily under these circumstances uncorrected. I crave for them the leniency of the public. Want of space prevented the discussion of the Photolithographic and Woodbury Processes, as well as Positive and Negative Re- touch. For the study of the latter, I recommend the excellent little work on Retouching, by Grasshoff. For the third part, The Photographic ^Esthetics, I implore the mild judgment of the professional artist. It is not my purpose to enter into discussions whether photography is an art or not. I start from the fact established by experience, that a sharp and faultless portrait or landscape picture does not satisfy us, when the laws of art, the observance of which is the cause of our pleasure in the works of the drawing artist, have been neglected. So far as these laws are applicable to photography, I have en- deavored to illustrate them by examples. In this branch the pro- duction of proper illustrations offers great difficulties. Only a few could be taken from the articles of Robinson, published in the “ Mittheilungen.” For the majority I am indebted to the art establishment of A. Seemann, in Leipzig. Dr. H. YOGEL. Berlin, April 15, 1870. PREFACE TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. I have endeavored to lay down in this book not only the formulae, a description of the different apparatus and manipula- tions which are necessary for the mechanical production of a pho- tographic picture, but I have tried also to elucidate those art principles which we must follow when we wish to make an artistic- ally beautiful picture. Unless we treat the pose and illumination in an artistic manner, the best of chemicals and the most exquisite lenses will fail to pro- duce a beautiful picture. To speak of these principles is for a Photographic Handbook a necessity, particularly as at present portraiture is the most important branch of photography, and is likely to remain so. The description of positive and negative retouching I omit, as they have been treated in so excellent a manner by Mr. Ayres.* In the American edition I have tried to adapt the Handbook to the wants of the American photographic public, and prize it indeed as a great favor that, thanks to the honorable invitation which I received to visit this country, I was enabled to inspect personally the American photographic establishments, and to appreciate them. I shall feel happy if my work should receive as many friends as I had the good fortune to meet during my brief stay in the United States. Dr. H. VOGEL. Philadelphia, August 12, 1870. * How to Paint Photographs. INTRODUCTION. A careful study of the history of invention will show but few periods as rich in new ideas and facts as the past hundred years. With the rise of the explaining natural sciences — chemistry and natural philosophy — commenced a new era by applying the dis- coveries to actual life and industrial pursuits. Thus originated the steam engine , gas , sulphuric acid , the manufacture of soda , beet-root sugar , the manufacture of ultramarine , not to mention numerous other things in which the physical or chemical action of heat was used in a new form. In an analogous manner we see another of the natural forces, formerly unused, enter as an active agent into our industry, — elec- tricity. Weber created the electro-magnetic telegraph; Jacoby the galvanoplastic process. Finally, the present age brought forth an art in which the chemi- cal action of light is the principal agent. This art is Photography. It has existed only twenty-five years, and still we ma} r say that no invention of this century has since its first appearance experienced such a gigantic development and exercised so powerful an influ- ence on our social, artistic, and scientific relations as this one. At first a mere method of taking portraits, its application has now extended to almost all the branches of human knowledge and science. It supplies a natural self-print in the widest sense of the word, — it furnishes the naturalist with faithful representations of animals, plants, and minerals ; the geographer obtains from it the basis from which to develop his maps ; it makes for the engineer in a few moments faithful copies of the most complicated machinery, and reproductions of his drawings and plans, which would occupy Vlll INTRODUCTION. the time of the most skilful draughtsman for weeks ; it supplies him with an authentic foundation for the construction of plans and maps ; it is employed successfully in lithography, and porcelain painting ; it serves the artist for multiplying his productions, and places copies of inimitable truthfulness at a moderate price within the reach of all; it is as important an auxiliary for developing a taste for art in the people as the invention of printing is for the dissemination of knowledge. Let us briefly consider how this art developed itself. There are many inventions which originated by accident, by the favor of the moment ; as instances, we may mention gunpowder, the deflection of the magnetic needle by the galvanic current, and the telescope ; but others required years of thoughtful study and experiment be- fore they could take their place amongst the inventions. Photog- raphy belongs to the latter class. It was long known that chloride of silver would turn dark on being exposed to light. It was also known that paper, the skin, &c., when wetted with a solution of silver, would be discolored by the light of the sun. But only in the beginning of this century the idea was conceived to use these facts for the production of pictures by the agency of light. Two Englishmen, Davy and Wedge wood, made the first experi- ments of the kind in the year 1802. They placed a piece of paper in a solution of silver, brought it into contact with an opaque ob- ject — for instance, a silhouette — and exposed it to sunlight. All that part of the paper not covered by the silhouette turned brown by the action of light ; the balance of the paper remained white ; thus a white picture on a brown ground was produced. This was the first light picture. Unfortunately these pictures were not permanent. The part which remained white soon darkened by the action of diffused light, and finally the picture disappeared by the influence of the same agency to which it owed its origin. Davy photographed in this manner the image of the solar microscope. Almost simultaneously with Davy and Wedgewood, a French- INTRODUCTION. IX man, by the name of Niepce, entertained the idea of making pic- tures by the agency of light. • From the year 1814 he worked incessantly; he experimented for years, but approached only step by step to the desired end, — the production of permanent pictures by the agency of light. While by the method of Wedgewood and Davy only flat objects, which could be placed in close contact with the sensitive paper, such as leaves, drawings, &c., permitted of being copied by the process, M. Niepce aimed to obtain representations of all kinds of objects in nature, — portraits, landscapes, &c. By the aid of the camera obscura, which the physicist Porta invented in the six- teenth century, he succeeded in this. Wedgewood had already the idea to fix the charming pictures of this instrument on his paper, but it was not sensitive enough. Niepce resorted to another preparation sensitive to light, — namely, a solution of asphaltum in oil of lavender. With such a solution he coated a metal plate and exposed it for hours in the camera. The places which had been exposed to light became insoluble, and in the after-treatment with ethereal oils remained on the plate and formed a picture. By this process Niepce produced imperfect light pictures as far back as 1826 — the so-called heliographs — but the production was too difficult and complicated to give it great practical value. In the year 1829 Niepce joined Daguerre, who was working in the same direction. The two labored together until the year 1833, when Niepce, full of grief over his twenty years of unsuccessful toil, died. Daguerre became the sole heir of his ideas, and a few years after Niepce’s death the great problem, to produce by the agency of light a permanent picture in an easy and practical man- ner, was solved. In the year 1838 he placed the first proofs of his process before the three members of the French Academy, — Hum- boldt, Biot, and Arago. The excitement was immense ; everybody was anxious to learn how these pictures were made. Arago induced Daguerre to pub- lish his invention, and the Government granted him a pension of six thousand francs. At the same time a pension of four thousand X INTRODUCTION. francs was granted to the son of M. Niepce. On the 19th of August, 1839, tfie secret of the production of these pictures -was given to the world in the public session of the Academy. The con- course was enormous. All the votaries of science and art of Paris were assembled in the Palais Mazarin. Thousands, who could not gain admission, besieged the doors. The busy newspapers soon spread the news of this discovery throughout the world, and in a few years disciples of the new art could be found in all the princi- pal cities of Europe and America. Daguerre accomplished his purpose in a way very different from Niepce and Wedgewood. He employed as the sensitive substance the iodide of silver, which he produced by exposing a plate of silver to the vapors of iodine. The light impression which such a plate receives in the camera is at first invisible, but as soon as the plate is exposed to the vapors of mercury the picture appears with all its details. This is a cardinal point in Daguerre’s invention. While all the preceding experimenters tried to obtain a visible picture through the action of light only, he impressed the plate with a latent image, which only became visible by a secondary operation, — the develop- ment. In this manner light was only required for a short time to obtain a picture, and now it became possible to apply photography to living or moving objects. While the new art — called Daguerreotypy, in honor of its in- ventor — held its triumphal march through Europe, there lived in England a rich private gentleman, by the name of Fox Talbot, who pursued the same object as Daguerre, but in a totally different manner. About the time when Daguerre presented his first pic- ture to the members of the Academy, Talbot made a communica- tion to the London Royal Society about a method to reproduce pictures by the aid of light. Following the experiments of Wedge- wood, he took paper impregnated with common salt, and allowed it to float on a solution of silver. This paper, containing chloifide of silver and the nitrate of the oxide of silver, was placed in con- tact with a copper-plate engraving and exposed to sunlight; it proved much more sensitive than that employed by Wedgewood. INTRODUCTION. XI The light penetrated the white places of the engraving and dark- ened the corresponding parts of the underlying sheet. A white picture on a dark ground was the result, — a negative. The operation was then repeated ; the negative took the place of the engraving, a piece of prepared paper was placed under it,* and by exposing them to the sunlight a fac simile of the original print was produced. This operation can be repeated at pleasure, and thus a number of positive copies can be obtained from a single negative. By this invention of Talbot photography entered the ranks of the reproducing arts. After the discovery of Daguerre had become known, Talbot also tried to take pictures on paper by means of the camera. He floated the paper on a solution of iodide of potassa, and again on one of nitrate of silver ; when it had become impregnated with iodide and nitrate of silver, it was exposed in the camera. In this manner a latent picture was obtained in a short time, which could be made visible by employing a development ; for this purpose Talbot took a mixture of gallic acid and a salt of silver. The gallic acid re- duces the salt of silver, and metallic silver finely divided forms a black precipitate, covering all the parts which have been exposed to light. A negative was thus obtained from which positives could be made in the manner described above. This process was pub- lished in 1841. Talbot’s pictures, however, compared with those of Daguerre, were so primitive and imperfect, that his process was merely con- sidered as a curiosity, and attracted little attention. The rough texture of the paper was fatal to the delicacy which could be pro- duced on the polished and mirror-like plates of Daguerre. Soon, however, this was changed. Niepce de St. Victor, a nephew of Nicephore Niepce, the friend of Daguerre, following the example of Herschel, substituted for the paper, glass plates, and made them the bearers of the sensitive film of iodide of silver. He coated these with albumen containing iodide of potassium, immersed them in a silver bath, and thus ob- tained a very sensitive and homogeneous film on which he could Xll INTRODUCTION. take pictures much more delicate than those on paper ; but still this process offered great difficulties. In the meantime gun-cotton was discovered by Schoenbein and Boettcher. It not only proved itself a substitute for gunpowder, but was also employed in the healing art. It was found that this substance was soluble in a mixture of alcohol and ether, and that the solution, called collodion, left a transparent film after evapora- tion, which rendered important services as a sticking-plaster. Legray, in 1850, was the first who tried to use this solution of gun-cotton, as bearer of the sensitive salts of silver, in place of albumen, after the manner of Niepce, but did not succeed. Archer and Fry, in England, were more fortunate. Their experiments were rewarded with complete success, and in 1851 Archer pub- lished a complete description of his new collodion process , which as to the beauty of its results was in no way inferior to the albu- men process of Niepce, but far surpassed it in simplicity and cer- tainty. Archer covered plane glasses' with collodion containing salts of iodine in solution, immersed them in a silver bath, and thus obtained on the glass a delicate film saturated with sensitive iodide of silver. This plate, when used in the same manner as Talbot’s paper, gave a negative of extreme sharpness and delicacy, and excellent positive pictures on paper could be produced in any quantity desired by the method described above. The discovery of Daguerre was now completely superseded. The collodion pro- cess spread rapidly, and in course of time was more and more im- proved, and is at present the one exclusively used. Its rapid introduction is due partly to its delicacy, its easy exe- cution, and partly to the advantage that the collodion pictures can be multiplied in a much simpler manner than the plates of Daguerre. These circumstances alone, however, would not have been suf- ficient to give it the precedence over the process of Daguerre, as the collodion plates produce at first only a negative picture. It became necessary, therefore, to find a simple and easy way of printing positives with all the details contained in the negative, and this was finally reached through a special preparation of the INTRODUCTION. Xlll. Talbot paper. The latter was covered with albumen, which Niepce had already successfully employed in the preparation of negative plates, and thus the albumen paper was made a medium for the production of excellent positives. Collodion for the negative and albumen paper for the positive process form now the most im- portant bases of our photographic pictures. Besides these successive improvements other circumstances con- tributed materially to the rising importance of photography. The optical apparatus which served to produce the pictures in the camera were improved. Petzval invented the double objective in 1841 , which combines extreme intensity of light with correct drawing. It permitted the taking of objects with vei’y short exposure, and now portraiture w T as brought to its high state of perfection. Simultaneously with this, photographic chemicals were produced of great purity and cheapness. The qualities of those already in use became better known, and the imperfect ones were replaced by more efficient ones. Fizeaut, Claudet, and Gaudin discovered the greater sensitive- ness of the mixtures of iodide and bromide of silver. Goddard also introduced mixtures of iodide and bromide of silver into the collodion process. Herschel suggested the use of hyposulphite of soda, which re- moves the sensitive salts of silver from the photographs, and thus fixes the picture in a permanent manner. Fizeaut introduced the gold toning bath, which removes the un- pleasant color and makes them more permanent. It is owing to these and other numerous discoveries that photo- graphic operations have become so easy and practical, that any moderately skilful person can become an expert in a short time. The consequence has been that an immense number of people de- voted themselves to the new art in the expectation of making money rapidly and without trouble. The introduction of the carte de visite style made photography popular, and the public rushed to the galleries, which sprang up everywhere like mushrooms. In the same manner did the manu- XIV INTRODUCTION. facture of photographic apparatus and chemicals gain in im- portance. Optical establishments were started for the exclusive production of photographic lenses. Cabinetmakers devoted their whole at- tention to the making of photographic cameras, picture frames, and pi’esses ; and other accessories required special factories to supply the growing want. At present millions enjoy directly and indirectly the fruits of the beneficial invention of Daguerre and Talbot. Many of their followers are now simultaneously investigating the hitherto unexplained physical and chemical processes of this art, to find new branches for its use, and to do away with the im- perfections which still exist. Every day new suggestions are made, and a large number of photographic journals are published to register the new discoveries and to announce them to the world. It is not at all impossible that a new and more perfect process may supersede that of Talbot in the same manner as he supplanted Daguerre. Quite a number of interesting experiments have already been made by Niepce de St. Victor, Becquerel, and Poitevin, to produce photographs in their natural colors, the fixing of which, however, has not yet been accomplished. More important and suc- cessful are the experiments to replace the expensive salts of silver required by the present process by cheaper materials. Herschel employed first the salts of iron, Niepce de St. Victor and Burnett the salts of uran, and Mungo Ponton the chromates, as sensitive substances. The trials hitherto made have already produced remarkable results. Poitevin’s Carbon Printing Process particularly deserves in our opinion the greatest consideration of all the recent methods of printing. It is based on the sensitiveness of chromate of potash. The aim is now to increase the productiveness of photography to an unlimited extent by combining it with lithography and metal plate printing. Fizeaut was the first who tried to prepare a da- guerreotype plate with acid, and thus make it suitable for copper- plate printing. As early as 1844 he furnished such heliographs. Fox Talbot succeeded in transferring the photographic picture on INTRODUCTION. XV steel, and made a photographic steel-plate engraving. Poitevin tried to produce photolithographs, a process which has recently been highly improved by Osborne, Toovey, James, Asser, Lemer- cier, Burchardt, and others. The problem to reproduce line drawings has been solved and is already generally employed. The rendering of the half tones, however, still offers difficulties, for the removal of which numerous investigators are zealously at work. While this work is leaving the press, we are informed of a new and important discovery in this respect — the Woodbury Photo- Relief Printing Process — which seems to pave the way for a great revolution in our photo-mechanical printing processes. At the same time we receive samples of new photographic optical instru- ments, invented by Busch, Steinheil, Ross, Dallmeyer, and Zent- mayer, which increase the usefulness of photography in a wonderful manner. An appendix to the Handbook will report the particulars of these new discoveries. In these pages I only intended to give a com- prehensive picture of the gradual development of photography. H. YOGEL. CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction, vii PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. CHAPTER I. The Arrangement of the Gallery, 17 The Glass-house, 24 Criticism of the Tunnel Atelier, 25 Size of the Atelier, 34 Of the Glass — Ventilation, ......... 36 CHAPTER II. OF THE MANIPULATIONS THE NEGATIVE PROCESS. SECTION I. Preparatory Manipulations 37 Rules of Precaution, .......... 37 A. Preparations in the Glass-house, 38 The Camera, .......... 43 Use and Construction of the Camera Tube, .... 49 Description of Photographic Lenses, ...... 51 1. Spherical Aberration, ........ 55 2. Chromatic Aberration and Dispersion of Color, ... 55 Curve of the Surface of the Picture, 56 Distortion, ........... 57 Field of View and Amount of Light of a Lens, .... 59 Description of Photographic Objectives, 62 1. The Simple Achromatic Objective, or the so-called Landscape Lens, 63 2. The Portrait Objective, 65 3. The Orthoscopic Lens, ......... 70 4. The Triplet Lens, 70 5. Steinheil’s Aplanatic Lens, ........ 72 6. The Globe Lens, the Pantoscope, and the Zentmayer Lens, . 73 On Testing Objectives, .......... 76 The Stereoscope, ........... 79 The Panoramic Apparatus, 81 Preliminary Work in the Laboratory, ..... 84 1. Preparation of the Collodion, 84 Pyroxyline and Plain Collodion, 85 Iodizing Salts, 87 B xviii CONTENTS. PAGE Action of the Iodizing Salts, Permanence, .... Solubility, .... Photographic Qualities, Preparation of Salted Collodion, a. Ordinary Collodion, . b Equivalent Collodion, 2 The Nitrate of Silver Bath, 3. The Developer, .... 4. The Intensifier, .... 5. The Fixing Solution, . 6. The Varnish, .... 7. Glass Plates, .... SECTION II Photographic Operations, 103 1. The Cleaning, .......... 104 2. The Dusting, 106 3. The Collodionizing, ......... 106 4. The Sensitizing, .......... 108 a. The Sensitizing in the Bath, ...... 108 b. The Sensitizing in Dishes, 110 5. The Exposure, 112 6. The Development, 113 7. The Intensification, ......... 115 8. The Fixing, 116 8a. The Intensifying after Fixing, 117 9. The Varnishing, 117 Succession op the Different Operations in the Negative and Positive Processes, . • 119 91 91 92 93 95 96 97 97 98 100 100 101 SECTION III. The Care of the Photographic Apparatus and Chemicals, . . . 121 “ Photographic Lenses, 121 “ Cameras, 122 “ Glass Plates, 123 “ Collodion, 124 “ Silver Bath, 126 “ Developer, ......... 130 “ Intensifier, ......... 130 “ Fixing Bath, 130 “ Varnish, 131 “ Finished Negative, 131 The Positive or Printing Process, 132 A. The Silver Printing Process, 133 Preparations, . . . . . . . . . . .134 The Positive Silver Bath, . . 134 The Toning Bath, 136 CONTENTS. XIX PAGE Normal Gold Solution, and the Consumption of Gold, . . . 139 1. Alkaline Gold Toning Baths 139 a. Borax and Phosphate of Soda Bath, .... 139 b. Chloride of Lime Bath, ....... 140 2. Neutral Gold Baths, 140 a. With Chalk (after Davanne), 140 b. With Carbonate of Soda, 140 3. Acid Toning Bath, ........ 141 Acetate of Soda Bath, ........ 141 4. Bhodan Gold Bath, 141 The Fixing Bath, 142 The Paper, ........... 142 The Practice of the Silver Printing Process, 143 Sensitizing the Paper, ........ 143 The Printing, 145 The Printing of Vignettes, ....... 146 The Printing of Imperfect Negatives, ..... 146 The Washing, 147 The Toning, 147 The Fixing, 148 The Washing after Fixing, 149 The Finishing, 151 Care of the Utensils and Chemicals in the Positive Process, . . 153 Care of the Negative, ........ 153 “ Paper, 156 “ Positive Silver Bath, 157 “ Sensitized Paper, 162 “ Toning Bath, ........ 163 “ Fixing Bath, ........ 163 B. The Carbon Printing Process, ....... 163 The Use of Dr. Vogel’s Photometer, 169 Johnson’s Improved Pigment Printing Process, .... 175 Different Photographic Processes, 178 Permanent Sensitive Negative Plates and Positive Papers, . . 178 a. Permanent Negative Plates (Dry Plates), .... 180 1. The Process with Gallic Acid and Gum, . . . 181 2. The Resin Dry Plate Process 184 b. Permanent Positive Papers, ....... 186 Collodio-chloride of Silver, 187 Collodion Paper, 188 Transfer Paper and Transfer Pictures, .... 189 Positive Pictures Printed Directly on Glass, Porcelain Pictures, and the Reproduction of Negatives, 192 Printing by Development, ........ 195 Enlargements , ............ 196 1. The Indirect Copying Process, 196 2. The Direct Copying Process, ...... 199 Enlargement by Development, 201 Microphotography , ........... 203 XX CONTENTS. PAGE Stereoscopic Pictures , .......... 206 Instantaneous Pictures , . . . . . . . . . .211 Tent Work and Photographic Excursions, . . . . . .213 Applied Photography, 218 I. Photographic Reproductions, 219 II. Photographing of Models, Ornaments, Statues, Works of Art, Machinery, &c., 227 THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY, OR PHOTOGRAPHIC AESTHETICS. Photography and Truth, 232 On Light and Illumination, ......... 239 Of the Perspective, 251 Arrangement, ............ 265 Lines and Outlines, ........... 275 Dresses and Draperies, .......... 280 The Arrangement of Human Figures, 286 Characteristics, ........... 291 The Treatment of the Public, 298 I illing up the Picture, Accessories, and Backgrounds, .... 302 APPENDIX. I. WAodbury Photo-Relief Printing Process, ..... 315 II. Albert’s Process (Lichtdruck), 315 III. Photographic Optics, 316 On the Absorption of Light in Wet or Dry Plates, . . . 316 IY. Practice of Photography, ........ 316 Reproduction of Drawings Without the Camera, .... 316 The Reduction of Silver Residues, ........ 318 On Technical Errors, 319 Errors in the Negative Process, ....... 320 Original Errors, 320 Faults in Cleaning and Polishing, 320 Faults in the Collodion, 321 Faults in the Nitrate Bath, 322 Errors in Exposure, .......... 323 Errors in Development, ......... 323 Errors in Intensifying, 323 Errors in Fixing, .......... 324 Faults that Appear in Drying, 324 Faults in Varnishing, 324 Errors in the Positive Process, 324 Errors in Printing, .......... 324 Errors in Washing, 325 Errors in Toning, 325 Errors in Fixing, 325 Errors in Washing After Fixing, 326 Errors in Finishing, 326 . 327 Index, THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. CHAPTER I. THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE GALLERY. The photographer, like every other artist or mechanic, requires for his labors a place where he is protected against the influences of the weather. These labors are of various kinds, — partly mechanical, as the cutting and cleaning of plates ; partly chemical, as the prepara- tion of collodion, silvering of paper, developing, intensifying, fixing, and washing ; partty physical and optical, as the focussing and exposing; and, finally, partly artistic, as the posing of the sitter, the arrangement of the drapery, the illumination, and the negative and positive retouching. It is evident that these opera- tions cannot all be carried on in the same room, particularly as some of them demand diametrically opposite conditions for their success. The taking of the model requires much light, while the preparation of the plates must be carried on in almost total dark- ness. Every photographer needs therefore a suite of rooms, which however frequently appear reduced to two, — the studio and the dark-room. In assigning proper localities to the different work to be per- formed, particular attention should be paid to separating those branches which are in their nature antagonistic. The silver bath should not be evaporated in a room where prints are being mounted. The plate while being fixed must not be ex- posed to the danger of being sprinkled with the developer, not to mention a hundred other precautions. 2 18 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. The necessity for a division of labor and space increases with the magnitude of the establishment, in order that each particular kind of work may be carried on independently. A drawback to the proper arrangement of photographic ateliers is generally met with in the fact that they are located in the upper stories of houses, which were originally designed for other pur- poses. The consequence is that they must accommodate them- selves to the already existing proportions, and this can only be done by sacrificing many advantages. We find therefore the greatest diversity in the arrangement of photographic galleries. Only one principle in the above stated necessity of a division of labor seems to be persistently carried out, namely, the separation of the negative and positive processes. As examples of the arrangement of a gallery, we will give two practical illustrations. The one is the photographic atelier of the Royal Academy of Industry at Berlin, the other the atelier of Rabending & Moncklioven at Vienna. Any one who desires to arrange an establishment will find in these descriptions a guide, although local conditions will often compel a modification of these plans. The photographic atelier at Berlin (Fig. 1) consists of a glass- Fig. i. ffftfflffff x T - T ' house, A, 32 feet long by 22 feet in width. The height of the front glass wall or sash is 10 feet 6 inches ; the rear wall is 16 feet high. THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE GALLERY. 19 The roof is only glazed for a distance of 16 feet. The atelier itself does not face exactly north, but north-northwest, conforming to the building on which it is erected. In the summer-time the afternoon sun shines on the glass-house, an evil which can only be partially remedied by awnings and curtains. The curtains are arranged according to the system of Loescher & Petsch, which appears the most rational and has already been adopted by several Berlin photographers. It consists of side curtains which can be moved in a vertical direction, and top-light curtains which move parallel to the inclination of the roof. A section of the side curtain is represented in Fig. 2, and Fig. 3 represents one of the top-light curtains with the cords for moving it. Fig. 2. The curtains are 2 feet wide and overlap each other like the shingles of a roof, in order to exclude the light completely (see Fig. 2.) The guides are thin wires, df, on which the iron rods, E, which carry the curtains, slide. It is easy to darken the whole atelier, to make openings of 2, 4 T or 6 feet in width, and of any suitable length, and to modify the direction of the entering rays in various ways. 20 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. The cords for the side curtains pass over the rollers r, r, r, r, which are fastened near the roof to the board M, and at the floor to L ; the cords can be tightened by the screws g, g. The wires d , d, of the side curtains, hang down loosely, while those of the roof admit of tightening by the screws q , q (see Fig. 3). The cords of the top curtains pass through porcelain rings, Z, Z, which are fastened to M and L. The curtains are made of very opaque double blue material. The above system was especially designed for portraiture, which however is not the class of work done at the Academy ; still it does excellent service in the taking of plastic objects. Fig. 3. Immediately adjoining the glass-house, and on the same floor with it, is the copying-room, K (see Fig. 1), with a window facing N. N. W., and a top-light one-half the size of that which covers the atelier. A sliding door leads to the latter, which is opened when it becomes necessary to remove the camera to a great distance from the object which is to be taken ; by this arrangement the apparatus can be removed 45 feet from the opposite wall of the glass-house. THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE GALLERY. 21 The width of the copying-room is only 14 feet ; the length and height are those ,of the atelier. The top-light is, for copying pur- poses, a little too high. In order to bring the frames nearer to the light a movable platform of wood has been constructed, which by mechanical means can be elevated to a height of 8 feet, or lowered at pleasure. The copying-room is divided in two parts. The back part, i?, serves as a dark-room, where the papers are placed in the frames, and where the progress of printing is examined. The fresh copies are also kept in this room. The front part serves for exposure. A side door, t , leads to the roof, where, when necessary, the work can be carried on in the open air. Immediately adjoining the copying-room, but a little higher situated than the latter, and connected with it by a staircase, are the rooms for the further manipulation of the paper prints. 1st. The wash-room, V. 2d- The finishing-room, B. The former con- tains two troughs lined with asphaltum. They are 5 feet long by 2^ feet wide. They rest on the tubs, T. One of these troughs is for washing the fresh copies ; the other for washing the fixed prints. An opening carries the wash water with the silver con- tained in solution into the tub, T. Another opening, which can be closed, leads the waste water into the street. The tub T receives the water containing soda, and T' those which are free from this substance. The tables, S, $, are for silvering paper ; the toning is done in the light part of the copying-room. The adjoining space, A, is used for mounting, retouching, and rolling the pictures, and also serves as a store-room for paper, chemicals, &c. We now proceed to describe the apartments devoted to the negative processes. Here we have, first, a small laboratoty with top-light, A, in which the chemicals are mixed, the baths and other substances tested. Evaporations, and all other chemical processes are also carried on here. In the room next to the furnace are two places for evaporation, G , G ; the one for liquids containing silver in solution, the other for the solutions containing chlorine (gold solutions, &c.). The reduction of the silver residues of the different melting pro- cesses is finally done in the lai’ge laboratory of the Institution. D , D is the dark-room for the preparation of the plates. By a curtain, M, it is divided in two parts, and a space, T , T, is par- titioned off in the centre for the preparation of dry plates. 22 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. In D' the plates are cleaned, and all the work connected with it is done here. (7, 0 is the table with the silver bath, H the developing, and R' the fixing trough. They are separated by a partition, and each trough consists of two parts. From the left part the rinsing waters, which are rich in silver, are carried in a tub underneath the table ; the right hand part serves for the final washing, and the waste water is carried off 1 into the gutter. The width of each of the four troughs, which are lined with asphaltum, is 2^ feet. Gas and water-pipes run of course through the whole establishment. P are shelves for plates. The dark-room communicates with the atelier by the entry, 0, 0. Perhaps it would have been better if the laboratoiy, L , had been taken for the dark-room, but the arrangement of the building would not permit it, and the peculiar construction of the basis on which the atelier was constructed caused unusual difficulties in the proper distribution of the different localities.* Fig, 4. a, Rctouching-room for positives; 6, staircase; c, saloon; d, counting-house; e, negative- room; /, room for negative retouching; g, waiting-room for the servants; h, mounting-room; n, laboratory ; o, entry ; v, copying-room ; w, glazed gallery. The gallery of Rabending & Monckhoven has the advantage of being built for photographic purposes. * It will be noticed in Fig. 1 that the various rooms are not on the same level, and communicate by steps with one another. THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE GALLERY. 23 It is a two-story building, in the second story of which the glass- house is situated. It stands perfectly free, being surrounded on all sides by a spacious yard. Fig. 5. a, Toilet room ; 6, staircase ; c, store-room for paper ; d, plate-room ; e, dark-room ; /, entry ; g, enlarging-room ; h, glass-room ; n, tunnel. On entering the building, the elegant corridor, o, leads to the waiting-room, c, next to which is a smaller waiting-room for ser- vants, g. To the left is a room, ??, the laboratory, next to which the staircase leads into the second story to the glass-house, h. Back of the glass-house and facing south is a room, g , for enlargements ; next to it is a dark space in which the apparatus is placed. In the same room is a closet for the small unvarnished negatives in- tended for enlargement. The ordinary work of the positive process is carried on in an adjoining building which is connected with the main edifice by the glazed gallery, w. Probably an enlargement of the establishment made this addition necessary. The glazed gallery, which is open on one side, can be used for copying in the open air in bad weather. Not far from the positive- room is a smaller one, /*, for negative retouching. The retouching- desk, p (Fig. 6), which is placed near the window, is made of a large plate of ground glass as wide as the window. Below this plate is a mirror, s, almost of the same size, and placed nearly horizontal ; the mirror reflects the light of the skjr on to the ground- glass on which the negatives are laid. The plate is covered with suitable boards in such a manner that only that part of the nega- 24 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. tive which is to be retouched is illuminated. The mirror is sur- rounded by a transparent casing. The other apartments on the first floor, the separate purposes of which can be seen from the description, are all devoted to the different branches of the positive process. The laboratory for the negative pro- cess, e (Fig. 5), adjoins the atelier in the second story. The light enters through reddish yellow windows. Next to it is the store room for negatives. THE GLASS-HOUSE. The glass-house is that part of the pho- tographic establishment in which the picture is taken. We have given our readers in the foregoing descriptions the ar- rangement of the gallery in two different kinds of glass-houses, which in their construction differ materially, and are, so to say, the Fig. 7. Fig. 6. types of two different systems. The one is the atelier with north front, of which the Berlin atelier is a specimen ; the other the so- called tunnel atelier. In the former the apparatus is placed with TIIE ARRANGEMENT OF THE GALLERY. 25 the model in the same glazed space. The visional direction of the apparatus generally coincides with the longest diameter of the room. The principal glass wall runs exactly from east to west, and serves as a support for a more or less steep and wider glass roof. The model is generally seated at the side. Fig. *1 represents the interior of such an atelier, after the Ameri- can and Berlin model. The tunnel atelier consists of two essentially different parts, — a dark one in which the apparatus is placed, and a glazed one for the model. Fig. 8 represents the exterior of Monckhoven’s tunnel atelier. It is a peculiar structure, with a very wide glass front facing north, about 26 feet in length, and an eastern glass side of about 11 feet in width. Adjoining the glass roof is a covered Fig. 8. a space for the background, and a low and rather dark space, the tunnel, for placing the apparatus. The person is placed in such a manner that the part which is to be portraj^ed is turned towards the north — i. e., the face is turned towards the broad glass roof. The steepness of the roof facilitates the running down of rain and snow, and the high back wall acts as a protection from the sun. CRITICISM OF THE ATELIER TUNNEL. Experience has proven that in all constructions of ateliers the principle of excluding direct sunlight, and of working with the diffused light of heaven, is found to be the best. 26 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. The reasons for this we shall explain in the second part of this book. To exclude direct sunlight the glass surfaces face the north as much as possible, and to obtain the largest amount of diffused light the glass-houses are erected on the tops of high buildings, or in places where the horizon on the glass side is free from objects which would obstruct the light. In cities this is not always pos- sible, and frequently a considerable portion of the vault of heaven is cut off from view. The light which is reflected from buildings is not always useless, but its intensity is a different one. Sometimes it is lighter (when reflected from a white wall) or darker, and this circumstance becomes an annoyance when the light is to be dis- tributed properly by an arrangement of curtains. Not only the quality and quantity of light is essential in the use of a glass-house, but also the direction in which it strikes the sitter has to be taken into consideration. In the second part we shall give three photographic portraits as illustrations, taken with front-light, top-light, and side-light, and it will be noticed that front-light is the most unfavorable, while side- light is the most favorable. Leaving the explanation of this point for the aesthetic portion of our work, we will only mention that nobody should take a portrait exclusively with side-light, but that in the best portraits from the most celebrated ateliers this light pre- dominates. From this standpoint we cannot advocate a construc- tion like Monckhoven’s in which the front-light predominates ; it would appear more useful when, as shall be explained further on, the side-light could be widened and the front-light made narrower. For the better understanding of the distribution of light in an atelier, we must explain the main principles of illumination in a glazed space. We take for instance a room which receives its light through a window from the clear blue sky. Experience teaches us that the light in such a room is very unequal in different places ; the further an object is removed from the window the darker it will appear, and vice versa; but, besides the distance from the window, the position towards it becomes of importance. A point close to the window will appear darker than one equally far removed, but opposite to it. Let us explain the cause of this appearance. Excluding direct sunlight, the sky is the only source of light which illuminates the objects in the room, and an object will be lighter in proportion to the number of rays it receives from the sk}\ THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE GALLERY. 27 Taking for instance the point a (Fig. 9), which is opposite a circular window, the latter receiving a cone of rays of the size of the diameter of the window. We take a second point, a'; this point is illuminated by the cone 6, a r , c, which is considerably smaller. Still more pointed appears the cone which illuminates the point e, and thus it is explained why a will appear brighter than a', and a ' Fig. 9. brighter than e. The opening of the cones of rays, or the angle which is formed by drawing lines from the point in question to- wards the window, gives us a criterion of its relative brightness. I call this angle the angle of light. When we take a point on the wall containing the window, the angle will be reduced to a line,' and would be absolutely dark if it did not receive light by reflection. It is evident that not only the wall in which the window is, but also every other point in the room receives this reflected light from walls, floor, and ceiling. Every point in the room, the wall with the window excepted, is struck by two different masses of light. ls£. The direct light of the sky, the quantity of which is pro- portionate to the extent of the effective spherical surface of the vault of heaven. 2d. The reflected light of the walls, &c., &c., the nature of which is more complicated. 28 THE PRACTICE OP PHOTOGRAPHY. Let us look aside for the present from the reflected light and consider the action of direct sunlight. The illumination produced from this source wo will call, for the sake of brevity, the direct brightness. The direct brightness of a point in the room is, as has been ex- plained above, dependent on its position to the window, and on the size of the latter. For the better explanation of this point we will start from the plainest proposition, and consider the brightness of a point directly opposite to a small round window. The larger the window, the larger will be the angle of light. Suppose the angle of light should be small, then the brightness of a point will be proportionate to the surface of the window. In similar figures, the surfaces are proportioned as the squares of similar lines, and accordingly the brightness would be proportioned as the squares of the diameters of the windows. A window twice as large, be it round or square, will give for the same point four times as much light, and one of tlmee times the size nine times as much. With larger window openings the increase of brightness by increasing the opening is not so marked. We take for instance a point, a (Fig. 10), which is opposite the opening, c, &, in the otherwise darkened glass-house. Half the angle of light would be, in this case, a, and when we increase the opening succes- sively to twice the size, o or three times, o b ", and four times, TIIB ARRANGEMENT OP THE GALLERY. 29 Fig. 11. 0 b the angle of light at a will be increased by the piece a', a", a'", which, as will be seen by the figure, increases less rapidly than the size of the window-opening. We can draw from this at once a practical conclusion. If in a glass-house of 32 feet in length, a person, a (Fig. 11), is placed 5 feet from the glass side and 4 feet from the background, and the glass side is open from g to /i, we will have a criterion of the amount of light which the person receives b} r con- structing the angle h, a, g. The portion of the vault of heaven which is cut by the angle h , a, g , determines the brightness of the point a. If the length of the atelier should be 24 feet instead of 32 feet, that is, if it terminated at i, then the brightness would be determined by the angle i, <2, <7, all other circumstances being equal. A glance at the figure will show that the angles t, a, g , and ft, a , gr, are not very different — i. e., that in this es- pecial case the extension of the glass wall by 8 feet beyond 1 (by the piece f, h) would not secure any great advantages, particularly as the light which strikes the glass side h , t, under a very oblique angle, is for the most part reflected. Suppose we take two points, a and a ' (Fig. 8), the distances of which from the small window are different. As we increase the distance from the window we decrease the angle of light. A simple mathematical consideration leads to the result that the brightness of two points, which are located opposite a window, de- creases at the same ratio as the distances from the window increase. When we remove an object twice as far from the glass side of the atelier, we must, in order to secure the same brightness, open the curtains twice as wide, in order that the light-giving glass sur- face be four times as large as when the object is near the glass 30 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. side, or we must extend the time of exposure fourfold in order to secure the same result. When the window is very large the bright- ness will not decrease quite as rapidly with an increase of the dis- tance — i. e., at twice the distance the brightness will be a little more than one-fourth, at three times a little more than one-ninth. From the above considerations we may draw a practical conclu- sion and answer a question which of late has been asked quite frequently, namely : “ Which is the most practical , a high or a low atelier ?” But we have to answer another question first: For what purposes is the atelier intended? An atelier may be perfectly adapted to the taking of single portraits, while it may be unsuited to the taking of groups or re- productions, and vice versa. Ateliers like Tteutlinger’s or Adam Salomon’s, are excellent for taking single portraits, while they are unsuited to taking groups. The reason of this is easily explained. In copying large paint- ings or drawings we require a uniform illumination over the whole of the original, while with a single portrait the reverse is the case. The head, which is the principal object, should be lighter, while the other less characteristic parts should be kept in half shadow. These are ai’tistic qualities which in a high degree are visible in the portraits of Adam Salomon, and less strikingly in those of Carl V. Jageman in Vienna. If we should try to take a group under the same conditions of illumination, onty one person would appear properly lighted, w T hile all the rest would be in half shadow and scarcely visible. To answer therefore the above question we must consider first the purpose for which the atelier is constructed; and I will take the simplest case first, — the construction of an atelier for single portraits. Suppose we have an atelier (Fig. 12) about 25 feet high, and in it an object, for instance a person, a', h\ 5 feet high. Above the person is an opening, 5, c, in the glass roof of a given size. The distance of the head from the roof would be equal to 20 feet, and the distance of the floor = 25 feet ; hence the brightness of the two would be as 400 to 625 = 16 to 25, or nearly as 2 to 3. Suppose, further, we have an atelier 10 feet high, all other con- ditions being equal. In this case the head, k , would be 5 feet dis- tant from the floor, and the feet, a y = 10 feet ; the brightness of the two would be as 1 to 4. It shows how important these differences are. In the first case, in a bright atelier, the head receives only one and a half times as THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE GALLERY. 31 much light as the feet; in the second case four times as much. What is the consequence? In the former case we have slight con- trasts of light and shade, while in the latter they are very strong. In a portrait the head is the principal object ; the head should receive the main light. A con- trast of light and shade between hands and feet in the proportion of 2 to 3 is not sufficient to mark brilliant contrasts in the picture. A difference of 1 to 4 gives much more effect. From this stand- point a low atelier has the advantage for taking single portraits. As an example of such low ate- liers I would mention those of Adam Salomon and Reutlinger in Paris. The case is quite different when we take groups or drawings ,. where an illumination which is equally divided over the whole sur- face is desired. High ateliers are in this case desirable. But we can, in a low atelier, produce the same effect when the glass roof is sufficiently wide, or of a width equal to the group. When, on the other hand, we wish to obtain in a high atelier the same effects as in a low one, we will do well to place the persons under screens or curtains, which are placed at a height of about 10 feet above them. While explaining these principles we, for the present, do not take into account the light which is reflected from the walls, nor the amount of light lost by reflection in passing through the win- dows. Any one who has read the preceding directions attentively will find no difficulty in solving different problems in regard, to the brightness of a given point in the atelier. For small openings of light it is easy to calculate the brightness of a point in the room according to the formulae given hereafter, but with larger glass surfaces the construction of the angle of light will give the best criterion. For this purpose a drawing of the atelier (or a part of the same 32 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. containing the point in question, and the area of glass surface transmitting the light) is made in ground-plan and vertical section, and the angle of light is constructed both in the vertical and hori- zontal plane. From the above principles a criticism on the construction of the atelier follows as a matter of course. Let us take as an example the atelier (Fig. 11) which has a northern front. It is 32 feet long and 16 feet wide; it shows closed walls and a glass front, h , g. The scale is given. Suppose a person be at a, 5 feet from the window and 4 feet from the rear wall, the glass side to be open from g to h, or 28 feet. We will get the effect of the 28 feet glass side by constructing the angle A, a, g. Suppose we take instead of the long glass side, g , /i, an inclined one, g, k, of only 8 feet in length. The angle, k, a, g, will be exactly as large as the angle /?,«,, which are placed in the slit at X; the flange, i?, is screwed to the front of the camera-box. The back lens is at H, and the front lens at r. With the cap, ( 7 , the lens is covered or uncovered. By the rack and pinion movement, T , the fine ad- justment in focussing is made. The front piece, which is screwed on at r, serves not only for carry- ing the cover, but excludes also side-light. The fault of this con- struction is the detached slops , which easily get lost. Fig. 25 represents a landscape tube, by Ross, without cover. The simple lens is placed at H; the stops are permanently fixed and consist of a disk, $, with different sized apertures. By turning the same, the dimensions of the stop are easily changed ; a black disk, r, with an open- ing equal to the size of the largest stop, closes the tube in front. There are other tubes in the market, where the front lens can be used as a landscape lens. To this class belong the “ cone ” objectives, as shown in Fig. 26. 4 Fig. 25. H Fig. 24. 50 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. The back lens, H, is as large as the front lens. This lens has a movable mounting, and can either be entirely drawn out or brought more or less closely to the other lenses, to lengthen and shorten the focus. The stops consist of rings, which are placed inside the tube at D, the front part, (7, having been previously removed. This front part, by being screwed in a reversed position to the mounting, forms, when all the other parts are removed, a landscape lens at D (see Fig. 26), with stops and cover. Fig. 26. JJ The inside of the tubes should be perfectly black. When these surfaces reflect light, we will have spots on the plate at once. The tubes are generally screwed to separate boards or fronts, which are easily detached from or placed on the camera. For the purpose of exact adjustment of focus, the stop with the largest opening is generally used. Only a part of the picture be- comes sharp, and to remedy this, stops with smaller openings are introduced after the focussing has been done. When we wish to extend the sharpness as far as possible to the margin of the plate, we use a very small stop. To see the image on the ground-glass more distinctly, a cloth, which is thrown over the head, is of ad- vantage. A focussing-glass enables the operator to focus with much more certainty. To what degree of fineness the ground-glass has been ground is of much importance, for all imperfectly ground glass is frequently a source of error. Focussing is much easier with an objective giving fine illumination and in clear weather. In cloudy weather, and with lenses that do not have much light, it is sometimes rather difficult. A precautionary measure, which, particularly in bright weather, should be observed, is the exclusion of all extraneous light from the objective. Every objective acts not only as a lens, but also as OF THE MANIPULATIONS. 51 a window, and admits a great deal of diffused light, and this causes either fogging of the whole plate or interferes with the brilliancy of the picture. This diffused light is easily discovered by placing the head under the focussing-cloth, the ground-glass having pre- viously been removed. The camera, with lenses of large opening, will appear very light. To exclude this foreign light a box is used which surrounds the objective, and has only an opening in front, which can be opened and closed by a lid. Claudet and Bingham place the whole apparatus in a kind of tent which moves on rollers. The arrangement appears very clumsy. DESCRIPTION OF PHOTOGRAPHIC OBJECTIVES (TUBES) AND LENSES. The form of lenses which are used in the optical department of photography will be explained by the following figures. Fig. 27. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Numbers 1, 2, and 3, are thicker in the centre than on the margin. They are called convex lenses. Numbers 4, 5, and 6, are thinner in the centre than on the margin, and are called concave or dis- persing lenses. We distinguish biconvex (No. 1), plano-convex (No. 2), concavo-convex (No. 3), also biconcave (No. 4), plano-con- cave (No. 5), and concavo-convex (No. 6). The connecting lines of the centres of the spherical surfaces, which form the surfaces of the lenses, are the axis of the lens. Any plane which is placed through the axis of the lens, is called a main section. The collecting lenses have, within certain limits, the faculty of collecting to a point the rays, which proceed from a point, provided that these points are situated on the axis or near it, and provided that the angle which the rays form with the axis is not too large. When, under these conditions, a bundle of rays, parallel to the axis of the lens, falls on a lens, the rays will be united in a point back of the lens, and this point is called the focus, and the distance between the focus and the lens is called the focal distance. The 52 THE PRACTICE OP PHOTOGRAPHY. rays, which proceed from a point on the axis or near to it, are also united in a point hack of the lens, and it is easy to calculate its distance from the lens. If, for instance, the focus is = P, the dis- tance of the point of light = a, and the distance of its image = x , it follows that — -1 = 1 __ 1 x P - a For instance, a lens has a focal length of 10 inches and is 120 inches distant from an object, then — a = 120 inches, P = 10 inches ; hence — ap 120 X 10 1200 a—P ~ 120 — 10 ~ TTO = 10 -9 inches ; hence x is, i. No 1, j 32 to. 18.5 to. 207 70° 40' 44° 30' 0.027 Slight distortion. Busch’s 1 Universal V Triplet, j 64 to. 50.5 to. 390 72° 45° f Full -< open- ly ing. Draws correctly. The middle lens is in the older triplets smaller than yL of the focal length, and in the Universal larger than £ of the focal length. The Universal cannot be used without the middle lens. 5. steinheil’s aplanatic lens. We possess, in the Triplet lens, an objective which combines, with correct drawing properties, a tolerably flat field and consider- able intensity of light ; but we cannot deny that these results are reached by a rather complicated process. The three.lenses consist each of two glasses, each of which has two surfaces, so that in all we have twelve surfaces, to be ground and polished. The large num- ber of surfaces reflects or absorbs a considerable quantity of light. Steinheil, in Munich, attempted the construction of a lens which, being simpler in composition, should, in regard to its intensity of light, flatness of field, and correctness of drawing, equal the Triplet. Thus originated the Aplanatic objective, which, in a remarkable manner, fulfils all these conditions. Steinheil’s Aplanatic consists of two flatly curved symmetrical lenses, A , B (Fig. 33). Each separate one is composed of two cemented meniscus lenses, consisting however of glasses of differ- ent refracting power. The construction is the result of careful cal- culations by Dr. Steinheil, which so far, however, have not been pub- lished. The Aplanatic gives, with the full opening of the focal length), a sharp picture of the size of § of the focal length, and can, with good light, be used for portraiture, the same as the Universal Trip- let ; but it is slower than an ordinary portrait combination. What the lens is capable of doing will be best explained by a statement of the result of an examination by a committee of the Photographic Society of Berlin. OF THE MANIPULATIONS. 73 SteinheiVs Aplanatic Lens , No. 3. Diameter. Focus. Size of picture for portraits. Land- scape. Field of view. Practical size of pic- ture with 0.026 stop. Kemarks. 19'" 10K" 6J2" 10 w - - ( According to the state- j ment of price-list. 43 m. 296.6 m. 6" 65° 20' 43° 20' t According to the report } of the commission. 6. THE GLOBE LENS AND THE PANTOSCOPE. The lenses which we have described so far, have only a moderately laro-e field, which, under very favorable circumstances, may extend to 60°. Such a field may be sufficient for most landscape and architectural purposes, but it is inadequate when the photographer has only a short distance between the lens and object at his dis- posal, a case of frequent occurrence in streets or interiors. Harrison & Schnitzer, in New York, constructed a lens which is distinguished from former lenses by a very large field of view. The lens is a double objective, A B , with symmetrical, strongly curved crown and flint glass lenses, the outer curves of which form a sphere; the lens is pro- vided with stops, D. The stops are a necessary part of the objective. While the pre- viously described lenses, Portrait lens, Triplet, and Aplanatic, will give sharp pictures without any stop, the Globe lens will show so much spherical aberration as to make the picture useless. The consequence is that it is inferior in light to the previously described lenses, but excellent in other respects. The small stop excludes a large quantity of light which strikes the open front lens, and only a small portion which falls nearly vertical on the lens is able to exercise any effect. The annexed figure will illustrate the course of such a bundle 74 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. Fig. 43. of rays. The oblique bundles, L 7, and N J, after being refract- ed by the front lens, pass through the centre of the ob- jective and strike the points B and E ; being here again refracted, they leave the lens parallel to their line of inci- dence. The original Globe lens of Harrison showed only an angle of 75°. The Ross Doublet shows equal capabilities; its con- struction-, however, is different from that of the Globe lens. Busch, in Rathenow, has constructed an instrument similar to the Globe lens, which surpasses the latter lens in the size of the picture, and the picture shows the astonishing angle of 90° (field of view 105°). The picture which such a lens furnishes is twice as long as the focus of the lens. The arrangement of the lens is similar to the Globe, but the ex- ternal surfaces are not in the same sphere. In a still more perfect manner Mr. Zentmayer has accomplished the same object by a combination of two strongly convex simple crown-glass lenses. This Zentmayer lens is, particularly in America, whore it originated, very generally employed where a short distance and large field of view are required. The back lens is smaller than the front lens; the front lens can be used again as back lens of the next larger combination, an advantage which landscape photographers will fully ap- preciate. Any variety of combinations and series of f° ca I lengths might be constructed on the above principle; but the plan adopted is as follows: The most complete set consists of six lenses, the focal lengths of which Fig. 44. are — I, II, III, 5.333 inches. 8 “ 12 “ IV, V, VI, 18 inches. 27 “ 40.5 “ These may all be successively arranged in the same mounting, OF THE MANIPULATIONS. 75 giving combinations with focal lengths and circular fields at 90°, as follows : Lenses I and II give a focal length of 3.55 inches, and field 1 inches diameter. Lenses II and III give a focal length of 5.33 inches, and field 10£ inches diameter. Lenses III and IV give a focal length of 8 inches, and field 16 inches diameter. Lenses IV and V give a focal length of 12 inches, and field 24 inches diameter. Lenses V and VI give a focal length of 18 inches, and field 36 inches diameter. Thus, with six lenses and one mounting, five different instru- ments may be successively adjusted in as many minutes, the mounting being so arranged as to fit in the camera either way. To pass from one focal length to the next longer in the series, it is only necessary to take out the smaller lens and put in its place the second size above. Thus, to change 8 inches into 12, lens No. Ill is replaced by No. V, and the mounting reversed. A little shutter, close to the central diaphragm, serves for “exposing” in place of a cap; and a diaphragm plate is arranged with three holes for each combination, a large one for focussing, a middle one for quick work, and a small one to secure extraordinary sharpness ; for it is one of the merits of this lens that a large stop may be used for focussing, and a small one thrown in for the exposure, with not only good, but the very best effect. The decrease in the intensity of light towards the margin is a great disadvantage of the objectives with a very large field of view; the margins are frequently under exposed when the centre has re- ceived its full exposure ; this becomes particularly apparent when the centre of the field contains bright objects, while the margins are occupied by darker ones. In employing these instruments we have to observe, also, that the perspective is frequently exaggerated ; the nearer objects ap- pear too large, while those at a distance are too small. As the latest in this line we must mention Dallmeyer’s Recti- linear lens. This lens consists of two achromatic meniscus lenses, A and B, with a stop between them. The position of the stop has been selected in such a manner that the bright spot in the centre (ghost) is avoided. 76 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. The Rapid Rectilinear lens, lately constructed by Pallmeyer, re- sembles the older Steinheil lens so much that it may be considered Fig. 45. Ary a copy of the latter, in which Dallmeyer has only made a few changes. ON TESTING OBJECTIVES. The general method amongst photographers is to take with a new objective a few trial plates. Such trials are very valuable ; still the result is always one-sided, as it gives information only in regard to the size of the picture, the sharpness towards the mar- gin, and the difference between visual and chemical focus, also in regard to distortion. The intensity of light is only superficially ascertained, and as for the size of the picture, this in itself forms no criterion of the value of an objective. We often hear the remark, that a portrait objective, which gives a figure twice as high as the diameter of the lens, must be a good one. It is only necessary to examine the price-list of the opticians in order to find out that the size of the picture, with objectives of the same opening, varies considerably. So, for instance, the 3-inch lens by Busch (page 67) gives in Focus. Price. System I, a picture of 7 X 9 inches, 12 inches, 46 dollars. “ II, u 6 X7i tt 1 o 7 tt 51 tt “ III, tt 4f X 6£ it q 2 tt 60 tt “ IV, tt H X 51 ti >7 7 it ‘ 1 0 70 tt If we would take the size of pictures as the test, the first should be the best. The last, however, which gives the smallest picture, is the most expensive. In what consists the difference? It is in the focus. With equal opening , the shorter the focus the greater will he the intensity of light of a lens. This shows how im- OF THE MANIPULATIONS. 11 portant it is to ascertain the focal length of an objective when we wish to judge of its quality. When the focal length is known, we can form an opinion of the intensity of light. The intensities of light are , with equal opening , the reverse of the squares of the foci. When we take, for instance, No. IY and No. I for comparison, the strength of light is proportioned as 12 2 to Iff — i. e., as 144 to 59 t 2 6 9 0 , or almost as 2| to 1. Hence System IY has 2^ times the intensity of light of Sys- tem I, and in this consists its superiority (see table, page 67, on the relation of intensity of light in the different systems, and the time of exposure necessary for each one). The focal lengths, how- ever, are generally only approximately stated in the different price- lists. Many persons think that focal length is the distance between the ground-glass and the back lens, when the system stands in focus, or what is the same, projects a sharp picture on the ground- glass. This is correct only for the simple lens, but not for a com- pound combination. For a combination of lenses, the focus, and the distance of the ground-glass from the back lens, are two entirely different things. For an example, I will select the Steinheil lens. Its focus, ac- cording to the price-list, is 10£ Parisian inches, or 0.276 metre. According to my measurements it was 0.296 metre. Similar dis- crepancies happen frequently, and as it happens very often that one does not know, by the focus, whether the distance of the back lens from the ground lens, or the actual equivalent focus, is meant, the importance to determine the length of focus becomes evident. Dif- ferent methods have been recommended. I have tried them all, and consider the following the simplest and most reliable. The objective which is to be tested, is placed on a long camera; a strip of black paper, of about four inches in length, with parallel sides, is cut out, and afterwards divided again lengthways. The one piece is pasted on a board, or on a piece of Bristol board ; the other piece is pasted on the ground-glass ; both are pasted in a vertical direction. The objective is now focussed on the black strip, and the camera is moved backward and forward until the image on the ground-glass corresponds exactly in size with the piece pasted on to it. To make the upper line of the image exactly correspond with the same line on the ground-glass, it will only be necessary to fasten with a string the board carrying the black paper to a nail in the wall, and to raise and lower it until the lines coincide ; when the lower lines likewise coincide, the instrument is 78 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. removed from the camera without changing the position of the latter, and the distance between object and ground-glass is ex- actly ascertained ; by dividing this distance by four we get at the equivalent focus of the lens. It is advisable to paste a piece of paper with small print on it upon the black strip, as it facilitates focussing. When we know the focal length, we can draw a very nearly cor- rect conclusion in regard to the intensity of light. The opening is divided by the focal length, and the square of this figure is found. So is, for instance, the fraction for — Voigtlander C. de Visite. 68.5 230.4 Auzoux 3 inch. Busch’s Portrait Triplet. Steinheil. 76 64 43.5 350.5 390 303.06 Or expressed in simple figures — 1 1 1 3 7 < t 4* 6 The squares of these figures are — I 1 J_ 11.3 21 36 7 1 49 Theoretically, the intensity of light of the different objectives will bear the same relation. Practically, there are many exceptions to this rule ; the more or less fine polish, the color and form of the glass, play an important part. The author had two Dallmeyer stereoscope lenses of the same focus and opening, but the one had much less intensity of light than the other. But, until we possess an exact process for deter- mining the intensity of light, the above calculation will give ap- proximately this important factor. As important as the determination of the focal length is for finding the intensity of light, so also it serves to determine the ex- tent of the field of view. The lens is screwed to a very large camera in order that the circle of light may be completely visible on the ground-glass. The diameter of the circle should be exactly measured, and trans- ferred to a piece of paper (see a, 5, Fig. 35). In the centre a ver- tical line should be erected, d, c, its length being the same as the focal length of the lens, and we next construct the triangle, a, d, b . The angle at d is the field of view of the lens. This angle is easily measured with a protractor. OF THE MANIPULATIONS. 79 The possessors of trigonometrical tables do not require this construction, but can determine the angle from the radius of the circle of light and the focus. The tangent of half the angle of the field of view is equal to the radius of the circle of light divided by the focus. When we take a picture in which the whole circle of light is visible, we will find that only the central part is sharp and fit for use ; but by substituting smaller stops the sharpness will extend further and further towards the margins. How far the sharpness is useful for practical purposes depends entirely on individual opinion. Some photographers are in this respect extremely pedantic, while others are satisfied with moderate results. The nature of the object also (whether portrait, landscape, or reproductions) plays an important part. When we desire to deter- mine how large the actual practically useful field of a lens is, we have to find out the extreme points where the sharpness is still suf- ficient, and then apply a rule and ascertain the diameter of the practically useful surface. When we execute the same construction as above, we will find the practical angle of the field of the picture. The introduction of stops has of course a considerable influence in extending the field ; and in comparing the performance of two objectives, the sizes of the stops must not be overlooked. It is, however, incorrect to measure the size of the stop only. In order to get a correct guide, the size of the stop should be divided by the focal length of the respective objective. The size of the picture is only to be considered when the instru- ment is nearly in focus with the ground-glass. It is quite different when the picture is removed from the focus. A carte de visite lens, for instance, will give in its focus a picture of about three inches ; but an object three inches long, placed in the focus of the lens, would if projected on a screen, or on the ground-glass, be five feet long. The size of the picture is, hence, only relative, when expressed in definite terms, while the angle of the picture re- mains, under all circumstances, the same. To test for focal differences, see the chapter on microphotography. THE STEREOSCOPE. When we look with both eyes at a near object, the view which each eye obtains of the object will be different. The left eye will see more of the left side, and the right eye will see more of the right side of a body. Both views combined produce the effect of 80 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. solidity. In 1838, Wheatstone tried to produce a similar effect by looking at two pictures, one of which represented the object as it would appear to the left eye, the other gave the right-eyed view : and his experiment was successful. He saw the plain figures solid. The figures employed by him w r ere drawn by hand, and consisted of lines and circles. The construction of pictures representing complicated objects, as landscapes and persons, offered greater difficulties ; and such pictures became only possible by means of photography. At the same time a handy instrument for viewing these pictures was invented by Brewster, which he called the stereoscope, an instrument which, at the present day, is found in every drawing-room. Stereoscopic pictures and cartes de visite rival each other, and both of these articles have become an incen- tive for the photographer to furnish the most perfect productions for the lowest price. Brewster’s stereoscope consists of two prismatic pieces of glass, L L ' , which, when attached to each other by their bases, would form a biconvex lens. Both the prismatic glasses are mounted in a piece of wood in such a man- ner that the points are opposite to each other, and that both correspond to the position of the eyes. When we now look at a stereoscopic picture, through these glasses, by bringing them close to the eye, and placing the picture at a distance where the objects appear plainest, the two pictures will appear as one, and give a per- fectly plastic impression. The coalescence is explained by the fact that the lenses act like prisms — i. e., divert the lenses of the eye in the direction of the refracting edges. Suppose that a and a' are two corresponding points in the stereo- scopic picture, and L and L' the lenses (Fig. 46), then the rays a b and a b' will be so diverted that they will appear as if they pro- ceeded from a single point, a". In order that this appearance may take place in a normal man- ner, it is necessary that the pictures should be mounted at a proper distance from each other. A trial will soon establish the necessary distance. As the stereoscopic glasses are lenses, they act at the same time as magnifiers ; they enlarge the picture. Lenses have the effect of placing the objects at the distance of most distinct vision, and as this distance is different in different individuals, it follows Fig. 46. OF THE MANIPULATIONS. 81 that the distance of the glasses from the picture depends on the individuality of the observer. For this purpose stereoscopes have been made where the glasses can be moved, or where the picture can be brought nearer to or removed further from the glasses. Generally the picture is near the focus of the lens with which we view it ; it is essential also that the focal length of the lenses with which we view a stereoscopic picture, should be of nearly the same length as those with which the picture was taken. When this is not the case a wrong stereoscopic effect will be produced, and this causes the exaggerated perspective in pictures which have been taken with lenses of very short focus, and are viewed with lenses of only slight magnifying power. Stereoscopic pictures are either taken with a camera with two objectives, the distance between them being about the same as the distance between the eyes (2^ inches), or they are taken with a single objective by placing the camera first in the position of the right eye, and then the left. For very distant objects, the distance has to be increased in order to recover the plastic effect; in landscapes this amounts sometimes to as much as several feet. For near objects excessive distance exaggerates the prominent points, and in case of a person, the nose or hands seem to project several feet from the body. THE PANORAMIC APPARATUS. The generality of photographic apparatus has only a very limited field of view, and does not admit of taking a view of con- siderable lateral extension, such as we frequently meet with at the seashore or in the mountains ; for instance, the panorama of the Rigi, or the Faulhorn. Martens, an engraver in Paris, conceived the idea of taking such pictures with a rotating camera, which would successively take in the whole horizon. He constructed, in 1847, a camera with a cylindrical daguerreo- type plate ; the plate remained stationary while the camera with the objective revolved ; the light acted on the plate through a small slit. It is easily demonstrated that, in spite of the revolving motion of the camera, the picture of the same object must always be projected on the plate in the same spot. The image of a point lies always on the straight line which is drawn from the point through the centre of the lens. When a is such a point, and o the centre of the objective, P, P, 6 82 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. Fig. 47. the cylindrical plate, then the image of the point will be on a line, a 6, drawn through the plate from o. When now the objective is moved around its centre (as is indicated in the figure by the dotted lines), then the image of a, according to the prin- ciple stated above, will still remain on the same line, a b (because a and o do not change their positions), and will fall again on the point b of the plate, and notwithstanding that the objective moves constantly, all the points of the object will be sharply defined in the picture. The above holds good only, of course, when the rays do not form too large an angle with the axis. To prevent this, a diaphragm with a narrow slit is placed opposite the lens, the opening of which is parallel to the axis of rotation, and which moves simul- taneously with the objective. The fault of Martens’ apparatus is the cylindrical plate, the prep- aration of which in the ordinary collodion process offers great difficulties. Brandon introduced in its place a plane plate, which, during the rotation, rolls itself, so to speak, off the cylindrical surface of the image, following the motions of the objective. The mechanism, to execute the motion in an exact manner, differs widely, and the opinions vary considerably as to which manner of construction is the most practical. Generally the camera, C, Fig. 48, with the objective, o, is placed on a horizontal metallic plate, 8, S; the camera rests on small wheels and revolves around an axis which passes through the op- tical centre of the objective. The wheels are moved by clock-work. The plate-holder runs in a movable groove, as in a carte de visite camera. A cord wound around the disk, 8, S , the ends of which run off in the direction of the tangent, and which are fastened to the ends of the plate-holder at a, causes the latter to move, and to occupy successively the positions which, in the annexed figure, are illustrated in three phases, — beginning at K\ K', centre at A, K , end of motion at K", K". OF THE MANIPULATIONS. 83 The pictures obtained with this apparatus are evidently projec- tions on a cylinder unrolling itself. The vertical lines are repro- duced vertical, but the horizontal ones, unless they coincide with the horizon of the apparatus, are represented as curves. Fig. 48. When we take a house front or a street with this apparatus, the top lines will appear as an upward curved line, while the base lines will be curved in the opposite direction, which effect becomes more unpleasant when the line is very long and far removed from the horizon. For architectural views this apparatus can only be used to a very limited extent, and a wide-angled lens is decidedly preferable. PRELIMINARY FORK IN THE LABORATORY. The chemicals necessary for the different photographic processes are generally mixed beforehand ready for use. The especially im- portant mixtures are the collodion , the silver bath , the developer , the intensifier, and the fixing solution. These fluids are absolutely necessary before one can commence to work, and they must be in such a condition that we can rely on their good qualities. In their preparation, preservation, and treatment the greatest care is neces- 3 r ed, but depend also on the qualities of the solvents that have been used. The more rapidly they evaporate the more firm will he the film, and with slow evaporation the film will be correspondingly soft. With an excess of ether the film becomes strong and cohesive, contracts easily, and does not adhere firmly to the glass ) it can often be removed entirely from the plate without tearing it. With an excess of alcohol the film is tender and tears easily. This is the case to a still greater extent when the collodion contains water. When to a good collodion water is added, a precipitate will be formed, which will redissolve on shaking. The collodion is now slimy ; the film seems transparent, netted, and very tender. These faults will show themselves when we employ an alcohol contain- ing much water ; to obviate it, we have to increase the proportion of alcohol. Here, however, another drawback manifests itself very soon : the ether evaporates and the remaining collodion yields as 86 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. tender films as before 5 such a collodion can be improved again by adding ether to it. How much alcohol and ether are necessary depends on the raw material. For cotton which shows a tendency to give a slimy and rotten film, much ether and £ — T > 3 alcohol should be taken. For cotton which has been prepared at a high temperature, and with a mixture containing much sulphuric acid, and which, in consequence, gives a firm, structureless, rapidly drying, and easily contracting film— i. e., a parchment-like collodion— more alcohol than ether should be used. The strength of the alcohol is very important. For slimy collo- dion the alcohol should be absolute, while for a pai’chment-like sample the alcohol may contain water. Hardwich recommends for the latter, when the alcohol is absolute, 2 parts alcohol to 1 ether. For hot seasons and climates a collodion with alcohol is to be recommended, as it will otherwise dry too rapidly. Sutton recom- mends, for hot countries, a pyroxyline which will dissolve in pure alcohol, the so-called alcolen. It is made at a high temperature (80°), but, according to Hardwich, the alcohol not only acts physi- cally, but also photographically. It increases the sensitiveness and the intensity. r J he former is only up to a certain limit increased by the addition of alcohol; when this limit is exceeded a diminu- tion takes place ; but it is different with the intensity, which, par- ticularly in warm weather, with a collodion containing much ether, is very feeble. The porous character of the film certainly exercises an influence here. In Germany we generally take for plain collodion one-half alcohol and one-half ether. Both must be neutral and free from essential oils. The cotton is weighed out, say, for instance, 20 grammes ; to this is added 500 grammes alcohol of at least 95°; better still is absolute alcohol ; and when the cotton is perfectly saturated with alcohol, 500 grammes ether, of a specific gravity of 0.125, is added; the bottle is now well shaken, until all the cotton has dissolved ; it is now placed for at least a week in a cool place for settlement ; when the collodion has become perfectly clear, it is decanted off. I generally keep on hand plain collodion containing two and four per cent, of gun-cotton. The former is for ordinary collodion; the latter is added to give any desired consistency. When all has dis- solved, this mixture is tested with litmus paper, to see if it has an acid reaction ; should the latter be the case, it has to be neutralized with a pinch of carbonate of soda. PRELIMINARY WORK IN THE LABORATORY. 87 Collodion must be kept in the dark in well-corked bottles. Ac- cording to its preparation it will keep for a shorter or longer space of time. Its keeping qualities depend in a great measure on the nature of the cotton. Half-decomposed pyroxyline, which has been made from old linen at a high temperature, will not keep long even if it should work well at first. To test plain collodion for its keeping qualities, it should be well shaken with dry carbonate of potash; if it is good, it must remain colorless for the first two hours ; if it turns lapidly brown, it will not keep long. The ether also has something to do with its permanence. It is often ozonized, and liberates iodine from the metals ol iodine that have been added. Such collodion will work very intense at first, but it will not keep. In oxidizing, aldehyde and acetic acid will be produced, which also act injuriously. IODIZING SALTS. The plain collodion, which is the bearer of the picture, may be mixed at once with the sensitive salts of silver, which in this case remain suspended in the collodion. This, however, is not generally done, but the iodide and bromide of silver are formed in the film by adding the iodine and bromine metals to plain collodion, and by dipping the plate coated with this mixture into a solution of nitrate of silver, by double decomposition iodide and bromide of silver are precipitated in the film itself. The addition of the metals of iodine and bromine to plain collodion is called iodizing, and the salts which are employed are called the iodizing salts, and the collodion, after being mixed with these substances, is called iodized collodion, or often simply salted collodion (the former expression is, in so far, incorrect, as not only iodine, but also bromine metals, are added to the collodion).* We will now consider a little more closely the properties of the iodizing salts and the salted collodion. It is evident that of the numerous iodine and bromine metals only those can be used for salting collodion which are soluble in alcohol and ether. The following are employed : Iodide of potassium (K I), atomic weight = 166.12, is a salt free from water, which crj r stallizes in cubes ; it melts easy at glowing * The reason why the salts of bromine are be explained further on. also added to the collodion will 88 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. heat; when the temperature becomes higher it evaporates; it is easily soluble in water; at 12° C, 1 part of iodide of potassium is dissolved in 0.135 water. The solution of iodide of potassium dis- solves iodine in considerable quantities. It does not dissolve readily in alcohol; 1 part KI requires from 40 to 60 parts of strong alcohol, according to Hardwich 180 parts of absolute alcohol. In its crystallized state, it does not change in the light ; dissolved in HO, it soon turns yellow in the light, and iodine is liberated. Its reaction is alkaline. Dissolved in 5 to 10 HO, no reaction is perceptible ; but when a piece is moistened with HO, and placed on violet litmus paper, the latter will after a while as- sume a wine color (that this change of color does not take place at once is probably owing to a decomposition). Hardwich states that the pure salt changes color in the light ; when this is not the case, it is owing to the presence of a free alkali. Bromide of potassium, atomic weight 119.12, crystallizes, free from water, in cubes, the same as iodide of potassium ; is perma- nent in the air ; melts at a red heat ; dissolves very readily in water, but very slowly in alcohol, so much so that it will pre- cipitate under double decomposition, when a saturated alcoholic solution of iodide of potassium is replaced by the solution of one of the bromine metals, for instance, bromide of cadmium. Accord- ing to Hardwich, an ounce of collodion, containing ether and 3^ alcohol, will only dissolve £ grain of bromide of potassium. Iv Br dissolved in 10 parts of water has a neutral reaction; but when pieces of it are moistened with water, and laid on pieces of litmus paper, its reaction is decidedly alkaline. The difficulty with which iodide and bromide of potassium dis- solve in water renders their employment in iodizing collodion rather difficult; it happens not unfrequently that they will crys- tallize out of the solution, particularly at low temperature, and form precipitates, which in the photographic practice give rise to spots. I employ them only exceptionally. Iodide of sodium (Nal + 4 HO), atomic weight = 186, crys- tallizes with 4 atoms of water in small spear-shaped crystals ; de- composes in the air. It dissolves very easily in water, and quite freely in alcohol; 100 parts of alcohol of 95 per cent, will dissolve at 15° C, 8.33 parts of iodide of sodium. On account of its solu- bility, it is preferable to iodide of potassium. In its other qualities it is very similar to iodide of potassium. A great deal of the Nal of commerce is almost free from water. Bromide of sodium (NaBr -f 4 HO), atomic weight = 139, PRELIMINARY WORK IN THE LABORATORY. 89 crystallizes containing a certain amount of water ; it is not influ- enced by exposure to the air ; dissolves readily in water, slightly in alcohol, but better than bromide of potassium. The solubility of the pure salt is not known. In the presence of iodide of cad- mium 100 parts of alcohol at 95° will dissolve (according to the amount of cadmium) 0.8 to 1.3 iodide of sodium. Unfortunately iodide of sodium, as well as bromide of sodium, when purchased commercially, are very seldom pure, and occasion, when employed photographically, many inconveniences. Iodide of ammonium (NH 4 I), atomic weight = 145, is a very unstable salt, which generally is half-decomposed when purchased ; it readily parts with iodine and becomes yellow. When fresh its reaction is alkaline; it dissolves in alcohol much more readily than K I and Nal, and must be kept in a dark place. Its impurities are very often Am OCO, and S 0 3 . The yellow mass is made white again by shaking with ether, or by adding a drop of sulphate of ammonia; its solubility in alcohol has caused its general em- ployment in photography. Bromide of ammonium (NH 4 Br), atomic weight = 98; it is made by the direct action of ammoniacal gas on bromine ; nitrogen escapes and NH 4 Br remains. It is a more constant salt than KH 4 I, and dissolves more readily in alcohol than KI and Nal. 100 parts of alcohol at 95° will dissolve 3 parts of N H 4 Br. Iodide of lithium (Li I -f 6 HO) contains, according to Ram- melsberg, 6 equivalents of water ; is deliquescent in the air, and turns yellow ; dissolves readily in water and alcohol. It is only rarely employed for iodizing. Bromide of lithium (Li Br 2 ) ; its qualities are not very well known. It dissolves, like Li I, readily in alcohol, and is only ex- ceptionally employed. Iodide of calcium (Cal) and Bromide of calcium (CaBr) form salts easily soluble in water, which readily decompose in the air by parting with carbonate of lime. Iodide of zinc and Bromide of zinc form white crystals, which become liquid when exposed to the air; are soluble in water and alcohol, and decompose readily. They are not often employed in photography. The inclination which Zn I possesses to form double salts is interesting; we mention the N H* + Znl and Kal + 2 Zn I. Iodide of cadmium (Cdl), atomic weight = 182.7 ; it is obtained by heating cadmium foil with iodine and water ; the solution yields, on evaporating it, large six-sided plates. It can be fused, and is 90 THE PRACTICE OP PHOTOGRAPHY. free from water ; under the influence of light it easily turns yellow ; dissolves readily in alcohol and water, and forms plates which have a lustre like mother of pearl; its reaction in solutions is acid ; ex- posure to the air does not change it ; it shows a tendency to forming double salts. Ka I Cd I + 2 HO} Am I Cd 1 + 2 HO C according to Croft. Na I Cd I + 6 HO) Combined with oxide of cadmium, it forms iodic oxide, which is decomposed l^y alcohol. Bromide of cadmium (Cd Br + 4 HO), atomic weight — 171.7; it is obtained in the same way as iodide of cadmium ; crystallizes with four equivalents of water in needle shape, which decompose in the air; is easily soluble in water and alcohol, and melts and sublimes at a high temperature; it is apt to form double salts. K Br + 2 Cd Br + HO also Ka Br + Cd Br and Na Br + 2 Cd Br + 5 HO (Croft). These double salts have not been exactly determined as yet, but the photographic practice seems to indicate that great solubility in alcohol and greater permanence are the characteristic features. This is the reason why mixtures of cadmium and alkaline salts are preferred for iodizing collodion. Of all the iodizing salts those of cadmium are the most permanent. They would be employed ex- clusively if their acid reaction would! not somewhat impair the sensitiveness of the preparations^ ACTION OF THE IODIZING SALTS. When different kinds of collodion are mixed with different iodizing salts in equivalent proportions, we find very marked dif- ferences in their action, which we cannot expect a priori , and which relate, on the one hand, to the fluidity, on the other hand, to the permanency and sensitiveness of the preparation. Of im- portance are: 1, the physical actions which the salts exert on the collodion. It has been found that the alkaline iodizing salts (potassium, sodium, ammonium, and lithium) make the collodion limpid, while the others (Cd I, Zn I, Cd Br) make the collodion thick (some collodions, which have been prepared with an excess of sulphuric acid, become, on the addition of iodide of potassium, first very thick, and then all at once very limpid). PRELIMINARY WORK IN THE LABORATORY. 91 We notice a similar tendency of making collodion very fluid in some of the alkline carbonates, which are frequently added to the iodizing salts. There are only four salts used in photography which have an acid reaction, namely, iodide and bromide of cad- mium, and iodide and bromide of zinc. The others, which have been mentioned above, have an alkaline reaction. It is self-evident that for the former a thinner, for the latter a thicker collodion should be selected — i. e., one which contains more or less pyroxy- line. 2. Permanence In regard to permanence, collodion prepared with cadmium stands at the head of the list; it keeps a long time without turning yellow, while alkaline iodizing salts, in solution, decompose rapidly, and the collodion turns first yellow, next red, and becomes very limpid. The least stable salt of the kind is ammonium, next follows iodide of lithium, and finally iodide of cadmium. The bromine metals do not decompose as easily. The cause of the red color is the oxidation of the alkaline metals, on the one hand by ozone, which is frequently contained in the ether, on the other hand by nitrous acid from the pyroxyline. Sometimes the impurities of the salts are the cause, because they contain alka- line carbonates. The permanency of the collodion is increased when several salts are used for iodizing it; it is probably due to the formation of double salts, which resist decomposition longer (see above, iodide of cadmium). In a similar manner do the salts of bromine promote permanence (Hardwicli) ; the effect is particularly good with collodion containing iodide of ammonium.* 3. A third point is the solubility of the salts. Iodide of potas- sium, for instance, dissolves only very sparingly, and can only be used under certain conditions. A collodion containing equal parts of alcohol and ether (the former of 0.816) will bear for every 120 parts, 1 part of iodide of potassium (Hardwicli); but when we add iodide of cadmium, a more soluble double salt will be formed, consisting of almost equal parts by weight of both the salts. Bromide of potassium dissolves still more sparingly. Collodion * Concerning the preserving action of the salts of bromine, the author had a curious experience. He prepared two samples of collodion ; both contained the same amount of iodide of cadmium and iodide of sodium, but to the one he added bromide of sodium ; the collodion containing bromine turned red in a few days, while the collodion containing iodine only, preserved its yellow color for three months. On examination it was found that the bromide of sodium contained sulphuric acid. The same collodion prepared with bromide of cadmium kept splendidly. 92 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. containing 4^ ether and 3? alcohol will not take more than £ grain per ounce of bromide of potassium (Hardwich). A precipitate is easily formed when we add bromide of cadmium to collodion con- taining iodide of cadmium. This is a second reason for rejecting K I and taking the more soluble sodium and ammonium salts. Li I and NH 4 I dissolve very readily ; but their tendency to decomposition destroj’s the permanence of a preparation containing them ; and they are not very easily obtained pure. Of the salts of bromine, the best and most soluble is bromide of cadmium ; the next is bromide of ammonium, to which the author gives the preference.* 4. Finally, the photographic qualities have to be considered. These differences do not show themselves much with freshly iodized and pure collodions, which have been mixed with equivalent quan- tities of different iodine and bromine salts. Observe that a fresh iodide of potassium gives a stronger picture than iodide of am- monium, and the latter gives apparently a stronger picture than iodide of cadmium. The inferior intensity of the iodide of cadmium collodion pictures is probably explained by the acid reaction of the nitrate of cadmium oxide, formed in silvering. In course of time, however, the collodions will change, those containing K I and N II 4 I changing the most rapidly ; they become less sensitive and turn red and limpid, but will give, with extended exposure, suffi- ciently intense pictures. The change in photographic sensitiveness takes place much more rapidly, simultaneously with an increase of the intensity , in the presence of organic substances, such as nitro-glucose, grape-sugar ; also with collodion which has been prepared at a high temperature and in a very diluted state. One often finds that a collodion at first turns red, but becomes afterwards lighter. This is explained by the formation of organic reducing bodies, which absorb the iodine, which causes the yellow color. It only remains to explain why generally a mixture of iodine and bromine salts is employed for salting the collodion. In order to get a clear understanding about the main point — the * The solubility of bromide of sodium is much increased by the presence of cadmium salts. According to two experiments, 30 parts of alcohol contain- ing 0.7 iodide of cadmium and 0.7 iodide of sodium dissolved 0.233 bromide of sodium. While 80 parts of alcohol, containing 1.0 iodide of cadmium and 0.4 iodide of sodium, dissolved 0.317 bromide of sodium. With 1.4 iodide of cadmium 0.4 bromide of sodium was dissolved. PRELIMINARY WORK IN THE LABORATORY. 98 sensitiveness of the collodion — I undertook a number of special experiments. I prepared three different kinds of collodion, to which were added equivalent quantities of chloride of cadmium, bromide of cadmium, and iodide of cadmium. They were sensitized as usual, and a white plaster of Paris cast, partially covered with black drapery, was “taken” with the different collodions. All the three plates w r ere exposed equally long and developed with a solu- tion of sulphate of iron. The collodion containing iodine gave a very intense picture of the white plaster, but the drapery looked weak, and the outlines were indistinct. The collodion containing bromine gave a clear but weak picture of the plaster, and did not show a trace of the drapery. The chlorine collodion did not show a trace of the picture.* According to the above the pure iodide collodion is photographic- ally the most sensitive. To complete the experiments a mixed collodion was examined. Three different kinds of collodion were prepared: 1, a pure iodine collodion ; 2, a collodion containing as much iodine as No. 1, and besides 1 of a bromine salt; 3, a collodion with as much iodine as No. 1, and also ^ of a chlorine salt. With these chemicals the plaster of Paris cast and drapery were taken under similar circumstances. The iodine collodion gave again a very intense but rather “ washed ” picture of the plaster, and very little detail in the black drapery. The bromo-iodized collodion and the chloro-iodized collodion gave a less intense, but a clearer picture of the plaster, and much more detail in the black drapery. Some dark folds in the latter, which were scarcely visible in the picture taken with iodized col- lodion, became plainly visible with the mixed collodion. Hence, it follows, Pure collodion mixed with iodine is more sensitive for strong lights (plaster, &c.); mixed collodion is more sensitive for feeble lights. The latter is consequently employed when we wish to secure details in the shadows. PREPARATION OF SALTED COLLODION. The plain collodion must be mixed with the metals of iodine and * This does not prove the photographic insensibility of the chloride of silver collodion, as with longer exposure a picture would certainly be the result. 94 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. bromine. Many photographers add the latter to the oily liquid. This is impractical; generally the salts contain small traces of im- purities, which settle only very slowly from the collodion and necessitate a tedious decantation. It is therefore much more practical to dissolve the salts of iodine and bromine by themselves in alcohol, and to add them after a care- ful, if possible, double filtration, to the decanted plain collodion. Such a solution of the salts of iodine and bromine in alcohol is called an iodizer or sensitizer. Of especial importance is the selection of the sensitizing salts. As for the formulae that have been recommended for this purpose, their name is legion. It is not my intention here to furnish a col- lection of formulae, although amongst the many recipes there are a great many good ones. When we try the collodions of different manufacturers and photographers, we will notice in their qualities very perceptible differences. Some work soft, others weak — i. e., they furnish pictures with much detail in the shadows, but few high lights; others work hard, but brilliant. Some will yield an intense, others a thin picture. And still all these widely different collodions will give good results in the hands of a person who knows how to handle them. It is possible to secure with a feeble working collodion a brilliant picture by an illumination rich in contrasts ; and, vice versa , when we have a collodion which yields too much contrast, we may, by proper illumination, secure a harmonious picture. Also by the proper selection of the developer many errors may be equalized. But any one who intends to apply the same manner of working to all the different collodions, will condemn much as bad which, in more skilful hands, would secure good results. On the other hand, we cannot deny that, especially in this article, considerable capital has been made out of the ignorance of pho- tographers, and collodion with the strongest sensitizers — lately even casein and rubidium — have been recommended as the pho- tographer’s “philosopher’s stone.” On the presence of bromine depends the sensitiveness for dark rays — i. e., details in the shadows and softness ; while on the presence of the salts of iodine depends the sensitiveness for bright rays — i. e ., the intensity of the high lights ; from this the conclusion has been rather rashly drawn that collodion works softer according to the proportion of bromine which it contains; but this is cer- tainly not the case. PRELIMINARY WORK IN THE LABORATORY. 95 Late experiments of the author have demonstrated that a collo- dion containing two equivalents of iodide of cadmium and one equivalent of bromide of cadmium works softer and is more sensitive than a collodion containing double and four times the quantity of bromide of cadmium in proportion to the iodide of cadmium employed. When the amount of bromine was still further increased (three equivalents Cd Br and one equivalent Cd I), the resulting collodion showed great sensitiveness for feeble rays, but the high lights were pale ; it worked soft, but very weak.* But, according to my own experiments, the quantities of the iodizing salts act just as strange. I have made two collodions, the one twice as stronglj 7 iodized as the other was ; the former proved more sensitive and gave a more intense picture than the latter. For testing collodion nothing is better than a plaster of Paris cast surrounded by black drapery. For comparative experiments , the most exact coincidence in regard to light , silver bath , and developer , is of the greatest importance. The following is the formula most generally used by myself: a. ORDINARY COLLODION. j* 15 grains, 1 part of iodide of cadmium, 7£ “ £ “ iodide of sodium, 7J “ £ “ bromide of ammonium, 465 “ 30 “ alcohol, are dissolved and filtered. After filtration, 1 part, by measure, of the filtrate is mixed with 3 parts, by measure, of plain collodion, containing 2 per cent, of pyroxyline. When the raw collodion has been left to settle until it becomes perfectly clear, and the sensitizing solution has been well filtered, the collodion may be used after three days. The time which iodized collodion will keep is variable. When the pyroxyline which has been employed has a tendency to decomposition, the collodion will soon turn red ; so also when the salts are impure. It is most difficult to obtain the iodide of sodium pure. * 1 equivalent of iodide of cadmium corresponds with about 18 parts by weight. 1 equivalent of bromide of cadmium corresponds with about 17 parts by weight. f This is the collodion which is known as “ Dr. Vogel’s Collodion.” 96 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. b. EQUIVALENT COLLODION. 1 can recommend, on the strength of my latest investigations, as a collodion of good keeping qualities, the following : 18 parts of iodide of cadmium are dissolved in 270 parts alcohol. 17 “ bromide “ “ “ “ 270 “ “ 2 parts, by measure, of the iodide of cadmium solution, are mixed with 1 part, by measure, of the bromide of cadmium solu- tion, and 9 parts of plain collodion containing 2 per cent, of pyroxyline. This collodion contains for 2 equivalents of iodine 1 equivalent of bromine ; hence its name. It will keep for years. Generally, freshly mixed collodion will soon turn yellow, even if the sensitizing salts are colorless. Collodion containing salts of cadmium remains white longer than an}*- other. Some collodions have a tendency to fogging previous to their turning yellow. This can be avoided by making the nitrate bath acid, or by adding to the collodion a few drops of tincture of iodine (which will at once impart a yellow color to it). A collodion rich in alcohol is more apt to fog than a collodion rich in ether. Some collodions will settle very slowly; after standing for months they will still give streaked and spotted plates. This is particularly the case when they have been made at a low temperature. Such collo- dion must be filtered: this is a tedious operation, which has to be performed with an apparatus especially designed for this purpose. The apparatus has a funnel, T , Fig. 49, which fits exactly into the neck of the bottle ; the funnel can be closed by a ground-glass stopper, s ; washed cot- ton is loosely packed around the glass tube, r. The collodion is placed in the funnel and drops slowly into the lower bottle, while the air from the same es- capes into the upper one by the small glass tube. The upper stopper, s, prevents the evaporation of the collodion. How to use and how to take care of the collodion will be explained in a subsequent chapter. Fig. 49. * PRELIMINARY WORK IN THE LABORATORY. 97 2. THE NITRATE OP SILVER BATH. The functions of the bath are to make the collodion film “ sensi- tive ” — i. e ., to change the iodine and bromine metals into iodide and bromide of silver. In former times a diluted solution of silver 1 : 16 to 1 : 20 was used for the sensitive bath, and it is in fact suitable for that pur- pose still. But it is not advisable, however, to work with so weak a solution of silver, for the perfect sensitizing of the plates pro- gresses only very slowly, and if the collodion contains a great deal of iodine and bromine, this will retard it still more ; besides the bath loses with every plate a certain quantity of silver, and will soon be exhausted when the original percentage is very small. Another point is to be observed, — the solubility of iodide of silver in a solution of nitrate of silver. This causes the so-called “eating away ” of the film in a newly made bath, and to prevent that, we either place into a freshly made bath a coated plate, and let it re- main in it over night, or we add at once a salt of iodine, which causes the formation of iodide of silver, and lessens the capacity of the bath to dissolve it out of the film. I alwaj^s use for the bath the neutral crystallized nitrate of silver ; I never employ the fused nitrate, as it frequently contains silver combined with nitrous acid, which often gives rise to great annoyances. I dissolve 100 parts of nitrate of silver in 1000 , of the box is closed, a spring,/, presses the strips against the transparent scale. The scale is fastened to the glass lid, D, and can be held in contact with the box, I 7 , by the hook, Z. Fig. 62. When the apparatus is exposed the light will pass through the scale and darken the strip of paper underneath it. This darken- ing progresses from the most transparent to the least transparent end of the scale, and the progress increases in rapidity with the increase of the intensity of the light. On the scale black numbers are painted, in order to ascertain how far the action of the light has extended. The opaque num- bers do not permit the light to pass through them ; the chromate paper, which gets darkened around them, will show a white number on a brown ground. When the photometer is now examined by lamplight it will be easy to ascertain (by examining the strip of chromate paper) how far the action of the light has extended , as the last visible number on the chromate paper will indicate it. To ascertain the proper printing time of a negative we must proceed in the following manner : A plate containing, for instance, four cartes de visite negatives is exposed to the light simultaneously with the photometer ; when the instrument has, for example, reached the number 10, one of the four pictures is covered with a piece of black paper, which is placed between the negative and the pigment paper; the same operation is repeated when the number 12 has THE POSITIVE OR PRINTING PROCESS. 171 impressed itself on the chromate paper, and so on when it has reached 14 and 16 ; in this manner the different pictures have been respectively printed to 10, 12, 14, 16. The picture is developed and examined to see which part shows the proper intensity. The degree of the photometer, for this part of the picture, is the proper degree for the whole negative. Sometimes the proper printing degree lies between two of the numbers employed, for instance at 13 or 15 ; when this is the case the picture marked 12 will be a little too light, while 14 is a little too dark ; if all the pictures are either over or under printed, the experiment has to be repeated again with respectively higher or lower numbers. With large pictures, landscapes, &c., a similar experiment as with a carte de visite negative is made by covering successively pai'ts of the landscape, taking care, however, that characteristic parts — bright lights and dark shadows — occur in every part. A number of negatives are arranged according to their density; the practical photographer will easily classify them by looking through them ; they are assorted in three classes — weak, medium- dense, and dense ; the photometer degree for each class is deter- mined by actual experiment, and all the pictures are printed ac- cording to the result. A new negative is closely examined with the eye, and compared with a negative the printing degree of which is known, and the printing time is regulated accordingly. When a negative should offer difficulties in determining its den- sity, an experiment is easily made ; a characteristic part of the picture, under which a strip of sensitive paper has been placed, is exposed to the light simultaneously with the photometer ; the strip is gradually covered, when the photometer has respectively shown the numbers 10, 12, and 14; the strip is then transferred and de- veloped, and examined, in order to see which part has been exposed the proper length of time. After a few experiments of this kind, and after working for a short time with the photometer and the pigment printing pi-ocess, the e}"e becomes so well trained that a glance at the negative is sufficient to indicate the necessar}' photometer degree. For the purpose of printing on a larger scale the following method is the most practical : All the printing-frames which one intends to use are filled in the dark-room with paper ; they are exposed to the sunlight simultaneously with the photometer; when this instru- ment indicates the printing degree of the weak negatives, the latter 172 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. are taken up and carried into the dark-room, or they are reversed and covered up; and so on with the medium-dense ones and the dense ones. The whole operation will in fine weather only take a few minutes. The photometer must be watched very closely, in order to arrest the printing process at the very moment when it has progressed far enough. When all the frames have been taken into the dark-room they are refilled with fresh paper, and the pro- cess begins anew. When the saving of time is an object, and where not a minute is to be lost, three photometers, one for each class of negatives, should be employed. The next thing to be taken into account is the sensitiveness of the pigment paper; American paper, for instance, is twice as sen- sitive as English paper. When the photographer receives a paper the sensitiveness of which differs from that with which the photometer degrees have been determined for his negatives, a new experiment becomes necessary, and the result — the difference in sensitiveness expressed in photometer degrees — can easily be added to or deducted from the negatives, as the case may be. By a single trial (as described above), the degree of a single negative is determined for the new paper. When for the old paper the degree of a negative is, for instance, 12, and for the new paper, say 14, it only remains to add simply the difference, 14 — 12 = 2, to all the known degrees of the old negatives, and they will by this simple process be correctly timed for the new paper. When the new paper has a lower degree, 10 for instance, then the difference, 12 — 10, is deducted from all the known degrees. The photometer paper is prepared in the following manner : A sheet of plain Rives or Steinbaeh paper is cut up into eight equal parts, and immersed by lamplight for three minutes in a solution of 1 part of bichromate of potash, 30 parts of water. It is the same solution with which the pigment paper is sensitized. The strips are completely immersed, and hung up to dry. Paper prepared in this manner, kept in dry, clean wooden boxes, from which the light is excluded, will keep for at least four weeks without change. The photometer paper should be made before the pigment paper is sensitized in the liquid ; after it has served for the latter purpose, it is no longer fit for the photometer. THE POSITIVE OR PRINTING PROCESS. 178 The paper is cut into strips of suitable size to fit into the pho- tometer box; the fingers should be perfectly dry while handling it. The first and last strips are thrown away. The strips are laid one by one into the open photometer box ; the press board is placed in position, and the lid is closed with the spring. The upper glass lid is now opened, by lamplight, in order to ascertain if everything is smooth and even. The papers must be firmly pressed between the strips of tin. When everything is not smooth and even, it is easy to make it so by means of a piece of white paper, which is in- troduced from the glass lid, and smoothed with the finger. All this must of course be done by lamplight. When everything is in proper order the box is closed and hooked. So prepared, the photometer with the lid closed is placed in po- sition simultaneously with the covered printing-frames ; next the cover is removed from the frames, the lid of the photometer is opened, and the exposure begins. After a short time, say from one to five minutes, according to the -weather, the frames are covered again, the lid of the photometer is closed, and the latter is carried into the dark-room, where a lamp is burning. The instrument is here opened and examined, in order to see which figures have appeared. No. 2 appears first, bright on a brown ground, next 4, then 6, &c.; the higher figures of course much paler. In order to ascertain how far the action of the light has progressed, it is necessary to protect the eyes against bright light. The open instrument is held below or at the side of a bright flame, at about the distance of eighteen inches, in such a manner that the rays fall vertically upon the yellow paper. With the eye pro- tected against the light, -we glance over the paper (in the direction of the figures from 2 to 25). When held in this position it is easy to discern the figures. But not only should the attention be di- rected to the figures, but also to the index hands and letters, as they materially facilitate the recognition of the slightest light effect on the paper. Turning the instrument gently from side to side will soon enable one to ascertain the most advantageous position. After a few experiments the necessary expertness is readily ac- quired. It must be observed that when one steps from a light room into a dark one, that at first nothing will be noticed, but the eye soon accommodates itself to the dim light, and we are able to recognize all the details. Similar things occur when we try to read the photometer, and when the eyes are dazzled by bright light. 174 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. When the observation is over, the photometer is returned to its place amongst the printing-frames ; the lid is opened, the frames are uncovered, and the exposure is continued. After one or more minutes, the photometer is carried back into the dark-room, and re-examined, having previously covered the frames, observing all the precautions enumerated above. When the desired degree has not been reached, the exposure is continued. The time which has so far elapsed, and the figures which have been observed, serve as a guide for calculating how much more time may be necessary to finish the print. Exceeding the number by a single degree does not amount to much, as the error is easily remedied by longer development. Under-exposure is worse. When we have negatives of different degrees, we have first to remove those of lower degree, or we may cover them up, and con- tinue the exposure of the balance until their proper degrees have successively been reached. When all the prints have been made, the frames are carried into the dark-room ; the frames are supplied with fresh paper, and the upper yellow colored strip is taken from the photometer by press- ing upon it loith the thumb of the left hand; this lowers the spring lid; both ends of the strip are now pulled from under the tins; the remaining strips are smoothed down, and after closing the instru- ment, it is ready for another exposure. The upper yellow strip is thrown away. Photometer observations require the same qualities, which every silver printer should have when he wants to make silver prints: 1. An eye which can discern slight light effects. 2. Care in regard to the photometer paper. The latter is more sensitive than silvered paper, and should be treated with the same cleanliness ; it must not be exposed to bright daylight. Particularly in clear weather great care is necessary. If, through carelessness, the paper becomes affected by daylight, it loses part of its sensitiveness. We must also remark that in the lower degrees the instrument rises very rapidly; in the higher ones much slower. It is further to be observed that the paper scale must be firmly pressed against the yellow strip, as much so as the silvered paper has to be firmly pressed against the negative. The paper scale must not be touched with the fingers, and must be kept dry. The glass should always be cleaned previous to using the instrument. THE POSITIVE OR PRINTING PROCESS. 175 I mention the following degrees, for a negative of medium den- sity, as determined by trial, for different kinds of pigment paper : Paper by Swan (brown-black), “ Rowell (gray-black), “ Beyrich (purple-black), . “ Beyrich (purple-brown), . 15 degrees. 11 “ 12 “ 16 “ Johnson’s improved pigment printing process. Until recently the process of Swan was considered the most per- fect in use, and justly so when the results which it produced were taken as a criterion. Only one thing remained desirable,— a greater simplicity in the manipulations. This has been accomplished by the very interesting method of J. R. Johnson. The first advantage which this method offers is the lessening of the number of the necessary pieces of apparatus, and simplifying them. A box 14 inches square and 12 inches deep contains all the apparatus necessary for making pictures 9x1 inches. It contains two dishes of japanned tin provided with grooves, two flat dishes of the same material, a stand for plates, several plates of opal glass, some plates of tin or zinc, a bottle with bichromate solution, another with cement (see below), a thermometer, and a japanned box with pigment papers. No strong pressure or rolling press is necessary ; neither a large assortment of dishes, &c. The trough or the plate box is filled with water of a temperature of about 100° Fahr., which temperature can be maintained by placing an alcohol lamp under the dish ; a flat dish is next filled with cold water. An exposed sheet is placed for a few seconds in the cold water, with the picture side downward. At first it will curl inwardly, next it will become flat, and would, if left in the water for a longer period, hurl outward. At the moment when it has become perfectly flat , and before it has time to curl outward , it must be removed from the water. In the meantime a metal or glass plate (ground-glass is the handiest, as with it it is easier to test the result) is rubbed with a solution of wax, or better, stearine in alcohol •, on this plate is laid the sheet with the picture side downward. Jo avoid air-bubbles, this operation is best performed under water. The paper is next brushed over with a wet, soft camel’s hair brush, in order to bring it in perfect contact with the plate. All the plates are prepared in this manner. When we proceed in the above-described manner, 176 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. the sheet will remain a little less than one minute in the cold water, which is not sufficient time for the gelatine to become completely soaked with water. After the paper has been placed on the plate, it will absorb all the adhering water, and will adhere firmly to the glass without the aid of a caoutchouc solution. The wet paper will, however, adhere with the same facility to any other smooth surface which is impenetrable to water , as, for instance, canvas prepared for oil paintings, wood, stones, metals, &c. If the glass has not been coated with wax or stearine , the pic- ture will remain attached after development , and form a charming transparency or opalotype. The fatty film prevents, however, a perfect cohesion of both parts, and makes a future separation pos- sible, which takes place at the second transfer. The reader will already notice several advantages: the expensive caoutchouc solution, which has to be coated on two different sur- faces, is omitted ; also the unpleasant benzine vapor is avoided. The operations are easier and more rapid, and the press is useless. I must mention another great advantage. As the surface of the paper which is attached to the glass is afterwards the picture surface, it will present either a dull or glossy appearance. The former when ground-glass, the latter when polished glass has been used ; and it is, therefore, in any one’s power to produce dull or glossy prints at his pleasure. However, let us return to our subject. The pigment paper, which has been laid on the glass in the above-described manner, will in a few minutes be ready for development. The plates are placed one after the other in the grooves of the trough containing warm water, until the latter is completely filled. In the meantime the paper on the first plate has separated itself from the gelatine film. The paper is lifted off with great care, in order that the gelatine film may remain firmly attached to the glass, and the latter is returned to its groove. When the paper has been removed from all the twelve plates, the development of the first plate will be complete ; it is washed in cold water, placed in another box also provided with grooves, and left to dry. When the last plate has so far progressed, the first one will be ready for transfer. For this purpose the plate is dipped in cold water, and under the surface of the plate a piece of gelatine paper is laid, which thus comes in contact with the picture on the glass. Both are now lifted out of the water ; the paper is brushed over, as described above, in order to make the contact perfect, and is now left to dry for an hour. Commencing at one THE POSITIVE OR PRINTING PROCESS. 177 corner, the paper is carefully detached, and as the picture readily separates from the glass, a perfect picture is obtained. Instead of empk>3 T ing gelatine paper, which in order to make it insoluble has to be treated subsequently with alum, the plate may be dipped at once into a weak solution of gelatine to which has been added a small quantity of chromate of alum. Swan has also recommended this for the last transfer of his prints ; or a resinous cement can be substituted for the gelatine, as will be described in the simple transfer process. Within one hour a dozen plates can be got ready for the final transfer, and all the operations may be carried on in an ordinary room, the windows of which have been darkened. Sufficient has been said now about the simplified process, with double transfer, by which with ordinary negatives a picture is ob- tained in the proper position. I will now describe a simplified process, with single transfer, by which with correct negatives we obtain pictures in a reversed position. It is evident that for a number of existing negatives this process is inadmissible ; but its extraordinary simplicity and effectiveness recommends it w T hen negatives are particularly taken for this purpose, or where the re- version is of no importance. The pigment sheet is sensitized and exposed, as has been de- scribed above. A sheet of fine paper is dipped in a solution of white shellac in liquid ammonia. This is the above-mentioned cement. This paper is next laid on a glass plate, a piece of block tin, or any other similar surface, and pressed to it with a camel’s- hair brush. When this is partially diy, the exposed pigment sheet, which has to be a quarter of an inch smaller than the transfer paper, is dipped in water to which a little ammonia has been added, and laid on the transfer paper, which remains on the plate. It is brushed fast, partially dried, and developed as before ; next it is washed and dried. The margin is loosened with a pen-knife, and the perfect picture lifted off. Nothing can be more simple and effective than this process. Simpson, in speaking of it, says: “ The method is in fact simpler, easier, and much quicker than the ordinary silver printing process.” It is further interesting to know that Johnson employs an ingenious method of sensitizing the paper and quickening its drying by simply floating it for a short time on a five per cent, solution of chromate. 12 178 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. PIGMENT PRINTS ON ALBUMEN PAPER. Instead of employing shellac, transfers can be made with coagu- lated albumen paper. Grasshoff and Jean Renaud coagulate it themselves by dipping it for a few minutes in strong alcohol, and drying it. It is self-evident that for this process a very cheap paper may be used. The moist coagulated albumen paper is placed on a glass plate, albumen film uppermost. Next the exposed pigment paper, which has been soaked in cold water, is pressed to it in order to expel air-bubbles. The pictures are placed for an hour in a press ; finally they are dipped in hot water in order to separate the sheets. The picture adheres to the albumen paper. The picture sheets are placed at once in lukewarm water, and developed in it. The development must be done by lamplight. The dried pictures are tanned, washed, and finished as usual. Jean Renaud has recently published a communication on the coagulation of the albumen film with alcohol. Experience has de- monstrated that alcohol dissolves the resinous sizing of the paper. Marbled stains are thus formed on the transfer paper, and when, after the transfer, the operation was carried on in water of too high a temperature, blisters would form on the picture. Jean Renaud has removed this difficulty in a simple manner. The exposed pigment sheet is placed in a package of slightly moistened blotting-paper. While the sheet becomes pliable, the albumen paper is placed in a large cylindrical glass filled with strong alcohol. It is instantly pulled out again, and placed, drip- ping wet with alcohol, on a glass plate, the albumen film being up- permost. The pigment sheet, which in the meantime has become pliable, is placed on the albumen paper, gone over with a roller, and is for a few moments pressed well in a press. It is next devel- oped in hot water. This method has many advantages : a saving of alcohol, which can be used to the last drop; the facility of preparing the albumen paper at the moment when it is needed; the prevention of blisters, even when boiling water is employed ; the saving of time, for when the sheets have only been moistened completely with water, we may place them one above the other and press them so as to be able to develop them immediatel}*. If pigment paper has been over-exposed, or become insoluble by too long-continued drying, the prints may still be saved by placing the pressed papers, previous to the development, for a short time, in a solution of cyanide of potassium (one part cyanide of potas- sium to one hundred parts of water). DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSES. PERMANENT SENSITIVE NEGATIVE PLATES AND POSITIVE PAPERS. In the previous chapters we have thoroughly discussed the collodion negative and the silver and pigment positive printing processes. These methods are sufficient for carrying on the most essential photographic objects. There are, however, circumstances under which the execution of these processes offers difficulties. The negative process requires a dark-room for the preparation of the sensitive plates, which the travelling photographer has not always at his disposal. It furnishes wet plates, which dry rapidly, and after a short time become useless. It has been tried to obviate this difficulty by making permanent sensitive dry plates, which can be prepared at home, and carried along on an excursion. Such plates should retain their sensitiveness for a long period, and should not require development until after the return home. Permanent sensitive positive paper has also been prepared, which, when bought ready made, obviates the unclean work of silvering, and is not liable to the danger of turning yellow in the printing-frame. Very great efforts have been made to produce permanent dry plates and permanent sensitive papers, which, as regards certainty and beauty of the results, should be equal to the wet process. Every day new dry processes and new sensitive papers make their appearance. It is doubtful which method is the best. So much, however, is certain, that the production of dry plates, as well as sensitive paper, is still very unreliable, and in spite of the greater expenditure of care and time, which the preparation of these bodies makes necessary, success cannot be guaranteed in the same measure as with the wet process. While in practicing the latter a truly pedantic cleanliness is a conditio sine qua non , it is still more so in the dry process. 180 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. a. PERMANENT NEGATIVE PLATES (DRY PLATES). The above-mentioned common fault of negative plates getting spoiled by the drying of the silver solution is obviated by simply washing the plates after silvering. It is best to use distilled water for this purpose, which must be absolutely pure and particularly, free from alkaline reaction. We obtain in this manner, after letting them stand for a short time, plates coated with a dry film of yellow iodide of silver, which, when exposed and developed in the manner described below, will yield a picture. It has been noticed that the degree of sensitiveness of such plates is very small, and an exposure four times as long as in the wet process is necessary. The cause of this is the great transparency of the dry plates. A plate saturated with a solution of nitrate of silver absorbs almost all the actinic light which falls upon it, while a washed plate allows a considerable portion to pass through it, which of course is lost for the formation of the picture. It is, therefore, necessary to pre- pare the plates with .a strongly iodized collodion, which, on account of the large quantity of salt contained in it, will form a denser film of iodo-bromide of silver; this absorbs the light more completely; or else the back of the plates should be covered with an opaque pigment. It should further be observed, that with such washed plates the sensitizer is deficient ( i . e., the body which imparts sen- sitiveness to the slightly sensitive pure iodide of silver), and that from this cause alone the action on iodide of silver is of less inten- sity. For this purpose it has been tried to replace the wet sensitizer of the silver salts by a dry one. As such, all bodies absorbing iodine can be used. Particularly tannin, gallic acid, and certain resins have been recommended. I distinguish, therefore, amongst dry processes, the tannin, resin, gallic acid, and other processes. With solutions of these sensitizing bodies the washed plates are coated and left to dry. By coating the plates with such a preserva- tive they not only become more sensitive, but also more permanent. The necessary washing, and coating of dry plates w ith a preserva- tive make the labor somewhat complicated. The development is still more troublesome ; the dry plate must first be prepared for receiving the fluids by soaking in w'ater respectively in a silver solu- tion. The too energetic sulphate of iron developer is apt to give rise to fogs and spots, and the preference is given to the slower acting pyrogallic acid, respectively a solution of sulphate of iron with the addition of organic substances, which have the peculiarity of retarding the chemical reducing process, — for instance, gelatine. DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSES. 181 The oldest dry process is that of Taupenot; it consists in the employment of an albumen film, which is silvered afterwards. The albuminate of silver takes here the part of the sensitizer. It is not my purpose here to give a description of all dry pro- cesses which have been practiced. So I shall confine myself to the description of two which I have worked successfully. 1. THE PROCESS WITH GALLIC ACID AND GUM, BY RUSSELL MANNERS GORDON. Well-cleaned plates should be selected and coated, previous to collodionizing them, with a solution of albumen ; 1 part albumen and from 12 to 15 parts of water are well shaken, left to settle, filtered, and sufficient ammonia is added, until it smells slightly of this substance ; the plate is placed horizontal, the fluid is poured on it, and the albumen distributed over it with the aid of a piece of card-board, in such a manner that a clear margin of the glass about a sixteenth of an inch wide remains. The excess of fluid is poured off on one corner. The plates which have been coated in this manner have little tendency to become spotted. Such a coating has also been recom- mended for the ordinary wet process, particularly when the plates are old, and have been used repeatedly. The albumenized and dried plates can be kept for a long time in a place free from dust. To convert them into dry plates they are coated with a good collodion, such as is used in the wet process (I use my equivalent collodion, see page 96). Gordon recommends the following especially : Ether, Alcohol, . Iodide of cadmium, Iodide of ammonium, Bromide of cadmium, Gun-cotton, 240 parts. 240 “ 3 “ 1 “ 3 “ 6 “ at most. The silver bath must, under all circumstances, be of a strength of at least one to twelve, and should be as neutral as possible. The time of immersion in this bath is ten minutes, or when the collodion containing the largest percentage of dry salts is employed, the time should be fifteen minutes. The washing is done in two upright baths filled with distilled water, and placed side by side. Plates that are washed under a running stream are apt to become streaky. When the plates are 182 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. taken out of the second bath they should be placed for two hours in a comparatively large quantity of distilled water, or they may be dipped successively in four baths filled with distilled water. After- wards thejr are washed again with ordinary hydrant water under the spigot. r I hey are then rinsed with distilled water from a wash- bottle, and coated with the following solution : I. Gum arabic, Rock candy, Water, II. Gallic acid, Water, 20 parts. 5 “ 120 “ 3 « 360 “ No. II should be prepared in a warm place ; it is mixed with No. I in the given proportions, and filtered before use. Air-bubbles must be avoided. Every plate requires 15 grammes (23 4 grains) of the gum pre- servative. 4 grammes (62 grains) of it are taken to remove the water, the remaining 11 grammes (110 grains) are left on the plate for about a minute ; the liquid is then poured off, and the plate is drained. 1 he latter operation is much more easily performed bj^ placing the corners in small glass tubes which are fastened to boards. The tubes are filled with blotting-paper, which can easily be re- newed without injury to the plates, as they rest only with one cor- ner on the tubes. The latter should have a diameter of about a quarter of an inch. When these glass stands are not at hand small tumblers may be employed, which, in order to give them more firmness, are fastened to the table of the drying-room ; the upper corners of the plate rest against glass surfaces ; it is well to num- ber the plates after they have been placed in position. The drying-room is a large wooden box or a kitchen closet, which can be closed against the light, provided with shelves so as to per- mit the placing of several rows at the same time. On the top is a chimney, bent twice at right angles, similar to the chimney of a magic lantern. In damp weather a tin vessel containing hot water is placed in the centre of the drying-room ; in summer-time this is generally unnecessary. The usual time for drying the plates is from ten to twelve hours ; the film will then appear transparent, and the backs of the plates must be coated with a film of pigment. To prepare eight stereoscopic plates it is necessary to take : Burnt terra sienna, divided in water, 100 grammes (3 oz., 231 gr. avoirduDois.) Dextrine, 30 grammes (1 oz., 25 grains). Glycerine, 2 grammes (31 grains). DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSES. 183 A trace of carbolic acid or creosote will prevent the mixture from spoiling. It is filled in tin tubes, such as are used for artists’ colors, so as to be always ready for use. The backs of the dry plates are brushed over with this color. It is always well to leave a narrow margin around the plate, in order to prevent the pigment from touching the picture side. After drying, the plates can be packed away. Exposure in the Camera . — The dry plates are exposed two or three times as long as the wet plates. Dry plates can stand long exposure without detriment. Generally, want of success is caused by too short an exposure. Too long an exposure can be remedied by a suitable development. Development . — The pigment is removed from the back of the plate with a wet sponge ; the margin of the negative is coated for about one-eighth of an inch with a thick solution of caoutchouc in ben- zole or chloroform 5 it is then immersed in a bath of ordinary watei, and rinsed twice with distilled water in order to remove the pxe- servative. It is now developed with the following developei . I. Gelatine, Glacial acetic acid, Water, II. Sulphate of iron, Water, 10 parts. 160 “ 1120 “ 25 “ 500 “ For use, one part of the gelatine solution is mixed with three parts of the iron solution. For every plate take about 30 gi amines (I oz., 25 gr.),and add two drops of a solution of nitrate of silver (1 : 16). The percentage of silver is increased by always adding two drops more until all the details make their appearance. Intensify with an ordinary citric and pyrogallic acid solution. For instance : Pyrogallic acid, ^ parts. Citric acid, ^ Water, 480 “ The fixing is done with hypo. The negative is subsequently subjected to a supplementary treatment with pyrogallic and acetic acids (and silver) ; the object of this is rather to change the color of the precipitate than to increase its thickness. Fog can be reduced to a minimum when to every ounce of so- lution of gum ten drops of glycerine are added. By this modi- fication the film does not become transparent after drying, and 184 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. works almost like a wet plate. It has, however, the drawback that it will only keep for two weeks. Ihe leader will notice that this is rather a tedious and laborious process. Ihe lesin dry process is simpler. The preservative (any resin, for instance colophonium) is added directly to the collodion, and the plate is silvered and washed. Abbe des Pratz was the first who introduced this process. Mr. England practiced it afterwards, and lately Mr. Harneclcer, in Briezen, has made it a specialty. 2. THE RESIN DRY PLATE PROCESS OF HARNECKER. A well-cleaned glass plate is coated with common collodion, to which for every 100 grammes (3 oz., 231 gr.) one-half a gramme of resin gr.) is added. When the last drop, after pouring off the excess, has become dry, the plate is dipped in a good working silver bath : bllver > 15 parts. Water, . . , . 130 “ Nitric acid, .... 2 drops for every 4 oz. of solution.* The most suitable temperature is 65° Fahrenheit; the time of sensitizing 5, 8, and 10 minutes. The medium time is generally the best. The silver plate is first well washed with filtered distilled watei, and next thoroughly washed with ordinary water. Finally it is linsed with distilled water, and placed on one corner to dry, at a temperature of not less than 70° Fahrenheit nor more than 100°. When dry the plates are ready for use. The exposure is, according to the intensity of the light or the age of the plate, twice or three times that of a wet plate. Fresh plates are much more sensitive than old ones. Ihe plate is, previous to the development, placed into a dish containing filtered distilled water (it is best to make the water slightly acid). The dish should be moved to and fro, and the plate soaked in it for from five to ten minutes. It is then taken out and placed in the same silver bath in which the plate has been origi- nally sensitized. It is raised and lowered from eight to nine times, and developed like any other wet plate. * I give above the original receipt, but believe it would be well to add to the silver bath one-quarter per cent, of the dry salt of iodide of potassium. DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSES. 185 The developer consists of: Sulphate of iron, . "Water, . Glacial acetic acid, Alcohol, . . 1 part. . 220 parts. 3 “ . 4 to 5 parts. Intensified with the following solutions : a. Pyrogallic acid, . . 5 parts. Water, . . 2560 “ b. Nitrate of silver, . . 15 “ Water, . 720 “ Glacial acetic acid, . . 32 “ Fixed with a solution of hyposulphite of soda. The develop- ment can also be made by pouring the above iron solution over the soaked plate. It is moved for a few seconds over the plate, poured back into a glass, and then are added two, or at most three, drops of a silver solution, consisting of: 30 parts of silver dissolved in 120 parts of water, and mixed with the following fluid : 30 parts of citric acid dissolved in 720 parts of water. 60 “ alcohol. The picture becomes visible at once, and the plate can be washed after the fluid has been poured over it several times, and the image appears clear and perfect. After washing with ordinary water, the picture is reintensified with p}Togallic acid ; but the acid must be used without the addition of silver in order to avoid fogging. After the pyrogallic acid has been poured off and on several times, citrate of silver is added for intensifying. If care has been taken in the preparation of the plate, not to have the collodion too dry before the plate is dipped in the bath, and it is left immersed suf- ficiently long, and afterwards well washed, a satisfactory result is certain, particularly when pictures in the open air and landscapes are taken. The development can be made at any time after the exposure. As regards the numerous other dry processes, such as the tan- nin, gelatine, coffee, tea, which are always tried over and over again, and always recommended, I must refer the reader to the photographic periodicals whose province it is to report the progress made in this direction. To any one who desires to work any of these processes, I must recommend once more the greatest care and cleanliness in the 186 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. treatment of the preparations. A slight impurity, which in the wet process would perhaps be passed by unnoticed, may cause a perfect failure in the dry process. Many dry plate pictures owe their ill success solely to the employment of distilled water which was not perfectly pure. But apart from this, the tedious mode of preparing dry plates will frighten a great many. Time is money ; and very often the packing and unpacking for an excursion of the necessary apparatus and chemicals of the wet process offers much less dif- ficulty and loss of time than the preparation of a number of dry plates. The dry plate process will only then become practically useful, when such plates can be prepared at not too high a price for the trade, so as to save the photographer the trouble of making them himself. b. PERMANENT POSITIVE PAPERS. Mr. G. Wharton Simpson, of London, the well-known editor of the “Photographic News,” recommended a paper four years ago, which had been coated with a collodion containing chloride of silver, in place of the albumen paper. Such paper yields prints as beautiful as those on silvered albumen paper, and has besides a peculiarity which escaped the notice of the inventor — i. e., that it keeps for an unusual long time. Papers which are made in this manner, provided they have been properly prepared, have been kept for weeks without change, while silvered albumen paper turns yellow in from one to three days. Obernetter, in Munich, was the first to make such a chloride of silver collodion paper for the trade. It yielded excellent results, but unfortunately the surface proved very delicate, and the paper had a tendency to curl in the wash water. Later, Carrier, in Paris, and Ost, in Vienna, have furnished similar preparations; the latter has published his process in a pamphlet, an extract of which I will give below. Quite recently a permanent albumen paper of different composition has been brought out by Schaeffner & Mohr, in Paris. It is called carbonate of silver paper, and is made sen- sitive by fuming with ammonia.* The treatment it requires is the same as ordinary silvered albumen paper, while the collodion papers require a somewhat different management. The carbonate of silver paper has the advantage over collodion paper on account of its being cheaper, more durable, and offering greater resistance to mechanical injuries. * Probably this paper of Schaeffner & Mohr is nothing but silvered and washed albumen paper. DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSES. 187 It is evident that a chloride of silver collodion film can be used not only on paper, but also on glass, wood, enamel, &c., and this circumstance enables us to produce the pictures on almost any given materials, either by preparing their surfaces directly with collodio-chloride of silver, and then passing them through the copying process, or by finishing the picture on the collodion paper, detaching the film, and transferring it to the desired object. COLLODIO-CHLORIDE OF SILVER. Ost uses two kinds of collodio-chloride of silver in the prepara- ' tion of his papers : Collodion No. 1. Plain collodion (containing 1J to 2§ per cent, of gun-cotton), 500 parts. Chloride of magnesium, 4.5 “ To this collodio-chloride of magnesium the following solution is added : Nitrate of silver, II parts. Water, 16 “ Alcohol, 40°, 16 “ The nitrate of silver is first dissolved in the given quantity of water, the alcohol added, and the solution thus formed is poured into the bottle containing the collodio-chloride of magnesium. This must be done in a dark-room, and the solution well shaken. To the milky collodio-chloride of silver thus obtained, the following substances are added while it is being constantly shaken : Citric acid, ....... 4 parts. Dissolved in water, 8 “ Alcohol, 40°, 8 “ Collodion thus prepared will keep for weeks. Collodion No. 2. Plain collodion (as above), . . . 625 parts. Chloride of magnesium, .... 3.75 “ To which is added the following solution of silver : Nitrate of silver, 16 parts. Water, 16 “ Alcohol, 40°, 16 “ To this is added the same solution of citric acid as above. 188 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. Both collodions are left to stand quietly for a few days ; they are then decanted from the sediment and ready for use. COLLODION PAPER. As a foundation for this collodio-chloride of silver, a kind of glazed paper had better be used, which Ost prepares as follows : A gelatine albumen solution is spread with a broad brush as evenly as possible on plain photographic paper. This is brushed away with a badger’s-liair pencil, and left to dry. The dried sheet is coated a second time, dried, pressed, and finally brushed, after which it shows a fine and glossy surface. The gelatine albumen solution is prepared as follows : The white of twenty eggs is beaten to a froth and cleared by settlement. The clear solution is mixed with an equal volume of a lukewarm gela- tine solution, which has been cleared by settlement (1 part gelatine, 4^ parts of water), and in this mixture 3 to 4 pounds of white of baryta and one-half a pound of (feather white ?) must be stirred. The solution must be poured on while it is warm. The coating of the paper with collodion is very easily done by fastening the paper with two drawing pins to a smooth wooden foundation, and pouring the collodio-chloride of silver on it in the same manner as on a glass plate. The paper is first coated with collodion No. 1, and left to dry by suspending it with slips; it is next coated with collodion No. 2, the excess of which is poured off on the corner opposite to the one from which the first solution has been poured off; after it has been dried again the paper is ready for use. Obernetter’s prepared paper is an article of trade. The time of printing with this paper is but half as long as for albumen paper, and is therefore particularly recommended for winter use, and also for enlargements. Before toning, the prints are washed with ordinary water (5 to 10 minutes) in order to remove the greater part of the free oxide of nitrate of silver. I. Dissolve in 1$ litre (8^ pints) of distilled water, Sulpho-cyanide of ammonium, 40 grammes (1 oz., 180 gr.), Hyposulphite of soda, 4 grammes (62 gr.). II. Dissolve in 1J litre (3^ pints) of distilled water, Chloride of gold, 2 grammes (31 gr.), or in place of it 3 grammes (46 gr.) of gold salt. These two solutions will keep for any length of time. For use, DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSES. 189 equal portions by volume of the two solutions are* mixed and may be used at once for toning. In this way one is enabled to make without scales, quickly, a small quantity of gold toning bath, suf- ficient for a few pictures. An exhausted bath is strengthened by adding a few drops of chloride of gold solution. When the copies have reached the desired tone (2 to 10 minutes), they are washed and fixed in the following carefully compounded solution : Hyposulphite of soda, 40 parts. Common water, 1000 “ From 5 to 10 minutes are sufficient for fixing it. The washing is done as described above. It is advisable to moisten the prints previous to mounting, as this will prevent curling ; or it is still better to mount them while moist. Ity passing them through the rolling press, with strong pressure, they obtain their full beauty. To make these pictures less liable to mechanical injury, Ost recommends the following varnish as a covering for the finished pictures : Benzine, 2 pounds. India-rubber, £ ounce. Mastic, ........ 1 “ Canada balsam, i “ TRANSFER PAPER AND TRANSFER PICTURES. As foundation for the transfer a photographic paper which has been coated with a gelatine solution of 1 : 13 serves well. The paper is coated with collodio-chloride of silver in the same manner as a negative plate is coated with negative collodion, with this dif- ference, however, that the coating is repeated when the first film has become dry ; the excess is allowed to run off from the corner which in the first draining was uppermost. In this way greater evenness is obtained. The paper will keep for months. To produce a picture, the paper is exposed under a negative, washed, toned in a bath of Rhodan gold, after Obernetter’s process, and fixed. These operations are no doubt well known and handy to most photographers. It is different with the transferring opera- tions, which Mr. Ost describes as follows: The Transferring . — After the last washing, the pictures, owing to the contraction of the rather strong collodion film, show a tend- ency to curl, which would be rather inconvenient for the transfer. 190 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. This inconvenience is easily obviated by drawing the pictures singly and rapidly through warm water ; they become flat at once, and will remain in this condition if they are placed in a second dish filled with cold water. Such an operation will require, for several hundred pictures, but a few minutes. When we wish to transfer to glass or paper, the photograph is laid with the picture side on glass-paper,* and immersed for half a minute in tolerably warm water; the paper can then with the greatest ease be drawn off the collodion film (which contains the picture). The glass-paper with the collodion film is placed on a plate of glass, which should be a little larger than the paper, and with a broad varnish-brush the gelatine which still adheres to the collodion is removed, by the aid of warm water. The operation occupies but a few seconds. A Bristol boardf is laid on a piece of clean blotting-paper, and about a teaspoonful of thin boiled gelatine of the following proportions is poured upon it : Fine gelatine, 1 ounce. “Water, k . 25 “ The glass-paper with the collodion picture is lifted from the glass and pressed, with the picture side towards the Bristol board, on the surface of the gelatine ; the varnish-brush is passed several times over the glass-paper, by which operation the excess of gela- tine will be squeezed out, and by seizing carefully the glass-paper at one corner, it is gently lifted from the Bristol board. The col- lodion picture has now been transferred to the board. Slight wrinkles which the film may still show will disappear after drying. For this purpose the finished pictures are laid on large sheets of paper, which have previously been saturated with a hot solution of one part of lard and one part of wax ; the sticking of the glazed Bristol board, to the corners of which the gelatine solution adheres will thus be prevented. Such sheets prepared with fat can be used for years. The transferring to glass is done in the same mannejj only sub- stituting glass for Bristol board, and selecting strongly exposed pictures. In the transfer great care is necessary in order to avoid air- bubbles between the collodion film and its foundation (Bristol * Glass-paper is a paper which has been brushed with a good copal varnish, which imparts to it a glass-like transparency. t If glazed Bristol board is used, the picture will show after drying a glass-like lustre. Ordinary board interferes with the beauty of these prints. DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSES. 191 board, glass, porcelain plates, &c.). After a short practice the necessary skill is acquired. It must further be remarked, that, in order to have warm water constantly at hand during transferring, the following arrangements must be made : An iron tripod of about three inches in height is placed on the work-table, and on the former is put a glazed kettle (such vessels can be obtained at any house-furnishing establish- ment) ; the kettle should have a diameter of from nine to ten inches, and a depth of about three inches ; it is half filled with water, and is heated by an alcohol lamp. The water is used for the drawing off, for the cleaning of the pictures from gelatine, for keeping the broad brush warm and wet, and also for heating the gelatine. Transferring to oval or round Porcelain Plates . — Transferring to oval or round porcelain plates differs in so far as the binding me- dium is not gelatine, but copal varnish. When we wish to make a brooch on porcelain or an enamelled plate, the picture intended to be transferred is cut in such a man- ner that on every side it will be a quarter of an inch larger than the plate. It is placed with the picture side on the glass-paper, and is now freed from paper and gelatine by means of warm water, in exactly the same manner as in the previous process ; the mar- gins and surface of the porcelain plate are now brushed with light copal varnish, which has been considerably diluted with chloroform ; about one part of varnish to five or six parts of chloroform. This so- lution is kept in a well-corked bottle. Only small quantities should be taken out for use, as the chloroform evaporates very rapidly. The varnish is laid on with a medium sized fish-brush ;* it should be done in quick and even strokes ; the brush must contain only very little varnish, and not be more than half wet. The varnished plate is placed on the corner of the table; the collodion film is pressed on and freed from the glass-paper; the protruding end of the film is laid around the edge of the plate, and by drawing it tight the wrinkles are removed as much as possible. A further smoothing is produced by rubbing first gently, and afterwards firmer, with fine cotton, such as is used for filtering collodion. It cannot be denied that a certain amount of practice is requisite in order to be able to transfer with varnish on medallions, and in the beginning the attempts will frequently result in failure ; if, how- ever, the operator has overcome the first difficulty and gained some * The above expression refers probably to the shape of the brush, being similar to that of a fich tail. — Translator. 192 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. experience, it will be found that the process works rapidly and without trouble. Ost sa} 7 s : “ I transfer about forty medallions in an hour without spoiling a single one.” On the unsuccessful plates the collodion film adheres firmly to the porcelain, and can only be removed perfectly with great difficulty. The best way of cleaning these is to let them lay over night in caustic soda. Objects whose form prevents stretching cannot be transferred with copal varnish, as the collodion film is contracted by the varnish, and gets full of wrinkles. The transferring on vases, dishes, goblets, glasses, cups, bottles, &c., which have to be frequently washed while in use, cannot be done with gelatine, as this dissolves readily in water. An insoluble transfer photograph can be obtained on them if albumen is em- ployed in the place of gelatine. For this purpose the white of seve- ral eggs is beaten to a froth and cleared by settlement ; the de- canted and limpid albumen is used instead of the gelatine solution. The collodion film adheres very well to this substance. Objects ornamented in this manner with photographs are finished by gradually heating them to about 190° Fahrenheit, at which temperature the albumen coagulates and becomes insoluble in water. POSITIVE PICTURES PRINTED DIRECTLY ON GLASS, PORCELAIN PIC- TURES, AND THE REPRODUCTION OF NEGATIVES. The white of four eggs is beaten to a froth with four ounces of water, left to clear, filtered through a cloth, and spread on well- washed glass plates. The coating is made more even by the aid of a glass rod, and the plates are left to dry in a place free from dust. They will keep for months. In order to prepare them, they are first coated with Collodion No. 1, and after they are dry, with Collodion No. 2 (see page 187) ; they are dried again and printed in a printing-frame under a negative, which is backed by black cloth. It is easy to control the printing, as the picture becomes visible through the glass. The prints must be vigorous. The plates are washed, toned, and fixed in the same manner as collo- dion paper (see above), and thus a fine transparency will be ob- tained which resists mechanical injury without varnish.* If this operation is repeated, a new negative can easily be made from the positive. For this purpose, however, a very intense print * This process can of course only be used with flat negatives. DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSES. 193 is required, and the best way will be not to tone at all a positive prepared with this intention, but to fix it at once, by which it ob- tains a brown and non-actinic color. If an enlarged print is desired, the positive is to be treated as stated below. Monckhoven published a short time ago some extremely im- portant remarks about the reproduction of negatives b} r means of collodio-chloride of silver. He says: u I have latterly paid a great deal of attention to the chloride of silver process, and will now give some of my discoveries, which will enable the photographer to successfully produce new negatives. “ I formerly believed that plates prepared with collodio-chloride of silver ought to be over-exposed in order to obtain vigorous re- sults. But I soon found out my error, and at the same time I made a discovery the practical importance of which will be evident to every one. “The same unforeseen phenomenon of solarization appears with the chloride of silver plates as with the iodide of silver plates, and in such a manner that if a plate of this kind has been exposed too long to the action of light, all the shady parts acquire by reflection the well-known metallic lusti'e, while by looking through them the red tint will be noticed, in which all the details will gradually dis- appear. This is the beginning of solarization or over-exposure. “The light acts on chloride of silver (with excess of nitrate of silver) in exactly the same manner as it does under the same con- ditions on iodide of silver, i. e., up to a certain point. When that point has been reached a retrograde action sets in. “ I have now tried to avoid the solarization of the chloride of silver plates, or at least to defer it, and I succeeded in this by ex- posing them to the vapors of ammonia. “ If a chloride of silver plate is cut in halves, the one exposed to the vapors of ammonia , and both printed under a negative, the difference is very perceptible ; the one will be solarized very soon, while the other will give a vigorous picture without the appearance of solarization. “ After these theoretical explanations, I will now state my mode of working. “ I prepare separately the following solutions : a. Normal collodion — Gun-cotton, 1 part. Ether, . . . . . . . . 32 “ Alcohol, 32 “ 13 194 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. I let it settle thoroughly, ancl only use the portion that is entirely clear. b. Chloride of magnesium, .... 1 part. Alcohol, 38°, 8 parts. After the chloride has dissolved, the solution must he filtered. c. Nitrate of silver in powder, .... 20 parts. Distilled water, 30 “ Alcohol, 56 “ The silver is first dissolved in water, the alcohol then added, and finally filtered. d. Citric acid in powder, . . . . .18 parts. Boiling water, 18 “ Alcohol, 128.6 “ The citric acid is first dissolved in boiling water and the solution filtered after the alcohol has been added. “For compounding the collodion a brown Rhine wine bottle is taken, for in such it will keep white in open light. It is filled with 600 parts by measure of normal collodion (a), and 50 parts by measure of chloride of magnesium solution (5). This is well shaken, and 60 parts by measure of silver solution (c) added ; the bottle is closed and shaken for a few minutes. 40 parts by measure of the citric acid solution ( d ) is now poured in; it is shaken again, and the collodion put away for eight or ten days, for it improves with age. “ I must call the attention of the reader to the fact that he must strictly observe the above-mentioned formulse, for the preparation of collodio-chloride of silver must be carried on with exactness. If too little silver is present, the collodion is insensitive to light ; too much' silver produces crystals on the surface of the plate. In the former case silver, salt is added ; in the latter chloride of mag- nesium. “ This collodion has an opalescent color. It will not form a pre- cipitate if it has been correctly prepared. “ The plates, after being carefully cleaned, are coated with albu- men which has been diluted with its own volume of water ; they are then well dried and collodionized. The collodion must be poured on very slowly in order to obtain a thick film. This is much better than to provide the plates with a double film of collodion, as, unless this is done with extraordinary skill, the second application of col- DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSES, i 195 lodion will partially dissolve the first. Before exposing the chlo- ride of silver plates, they are subjected to the vapors of ammonia. “ The ammonia is placed in a watch-crystal, which is placed at the bottom of a box provided with horizontal grooves. The plates are laid three or four inches above the glass containing the am- monia ; they are exposed for three minntes to the vapors, left for half an hour in the air, and placed in a printing-frame with the negative. “ Toning and fixing is done according to the directions given above.” About the reproductions of negatives by means of the camera, see the chapter on Enlargements. PRINTING BY DEVELOPMENT. As we have before observed, the direct printing process has, by the excellence of its results, maintained its precedence over the printing with development, in spite of its slowness. There are however, cases where, under certain circumstances, a preference is given to a sensitive process. For instance, in making enlarged pictures with feeble light, also for the production of prints in great quantity, where cheapness is of more importance than beauty. For such purposes several methods have been tried, and specially prepared papers have been employed. Very beautiful results are obtained on collodion paper. It is, however, only suitable when freshly prepared. Such a preparation does not offer any difficulty now, as the ready made pollodio-ehloride of silver, as well as gela- tine paper, are easily obtained through the trade. For the production of developed pictures on collodion paper , Obernetter recommends : Printing until the outlines of the picture become visible ; next immersion in the following solution : Water, 1000 parts. Pyrogallic acid, ...... i “ Citric acid, i to J “ When the picture has developed with sufficient vigor, it is washed, toned, and fixed, the same as ordinary collodion paper pictures. (Monckhoven’s printing process and printing by development fol- lows below, under the chapter “Enlargement with Development.”) ENLARGEMENTS. The photographer is often called upon to furnish an enlarged positive from a small negative. This can be accomplished by dif- ferent methods. Every lens forms a reduced image of an object when it is removed further from it than twice the focal length. When an object is nearer to the lens than twice its focal length, the image formed by the lens will be enlarged. A person five feet high, placed at the distance of twenty feet from a carte de visite lens, will have an image of three inches in height projected on the ground-glass, and vice versa , this same lens can produce a life-size picture from the small negative at a distance of twenty feet. The brightness of such an enlarged image decreases with the increase of surface, and it is evident that the negative which is placed at the focal distance from the lens must be bril- liantly illuminated if we wish to obtain a bright optical image, and this illumination should be the more intense the larger the desired picture is to be. For a moderate enlargement, six to eight times. 1. THE INDIRECT COPYING PROCESS Will be sufficient. With the ordinary chemicals a transparent positive is made of the size of the original; this can either be done with the camera or with collodio-cliloride of silver.* From the positive an enlarged negative is taken. Two cameras are used for this purpose ; the fronts are placed to face each other, and from one of the cameras the lens is removed. The objective of the second camera will project into the first camera; the latter serves merely as a proper receptacle for placing the negative and to exclude side-light. The negative, which has already received the necessary retouch, is placed in the plate-holder of the first camera, and kept in position by small pieces of wax, * Honckhoven gives the preference to collodio-chloride of silver. ENLARGEMENTS. 197 and the plate-holder is placed in the camera. The whole system is best placed on a long and very solid stand, opposite to a window, with an unobstructed view of the sky. I generally make such work in the glass-house. The base of the stand is placed in an inclined position, and the light, with the ex- ception of a space ten feet square, is excluded. I place the stand with the cameras opposite this opening. It is advisable to exclude all superfluous light. When the back of the negative receives light, it will look partially positive, owing to reflection. This of course may give rise to a false effect, and it is better to cover a black cloth over the space where the two cameras are joined together. And the light which passes through the transparent margins of the negative also exercises an injurious influence. The negative acts like a kind of window admitting diffused light into the camera, and disturbs the clearness of those parts which should remain transparent in the picture which we de- sire to produce. To obviate this, an opaque mask is placed in front of the negative, in which an opening has been made sufficiently large to illuminate the picture. Window bars and other dark objects in the visual line of the apparatus are disturbing elements ; to make them harmless, a piece of fine ground-glass is placed in front of the negative in order that the light must first pass through the former before reaching the negative. The back shutter of the plate-holder, in which the negative rests, is prevented from shutting by some simple contrivance. A correct drawing lens of short focus is selected as an objective. Carte de visite lenses of four inches focus, triplets, or aplanatic lenses, answer for this purpose. The bellows of the back camera must of course admit of sufficient extension when a large picture is desired. Card and triplet objectives should be fastened in a reversed position to the camera (the back lens being front). If we desire, for instance, a picture nine times magnified, we place the apparatus in such a manner that we receive a positive which has been magni- fied three times ; by repeating the operation without changing the position of the apparatus, and substituting the magnified positive in place of the original negative, we will get a picture which is 3 x 3, or nine times as large as the original negative. It is only necessary to focus once, after which the proper stops can be in- serted. The exposure should not be too short. The developed positive should show by transmitted light the same delicate details 198 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. in light and half tone as a fine paper print taken from the same negative would represent. A fully exposed positive, soft and very sharp , is absolutely necessary for enlargements. The beginner must not think that he has succeeded when a clean positive plate has been produced. Before proceeding further, he should examine it very carefully in order to ascertain if it is rich in detail. Sir H. Davy says, expose the positive until it shows a slight precipitate in the bright parts. Intensifying is unnecessary. When a good positive has been obtained, the enlarged negative is made from it in the same apparatus. Another way is to make a positive on collodio-chloride of silver by the direct process, which has been described above. But aside from focussing, which with enlargements requires some patience, the work with the camera is the most convenient. It is of much advantage to know the equivalent focus of the objective for the purpose of focussing (see directions). If this is known the negative and ground-glass can be placed at about the dis- tance of the equivalent focus, which will save a tedious adjustment. For pictures of original size the distance of the original (negative) as well as the collodion plate, for instance, is about equal to twice the length of the focus. For enlargements the distance of the original is less than twice the focus. Meagher, in London, has constructed a camera with long bellows, which, in the centre of the bellows, has an arrangement for placing the objective, and in the front part of which the negative is easily inserted. All the parts are easily brought nearer or further removed by endless screws, and sharp focussing causes no trouble. Any one who has to work much in this branch will do well to make marks on his camera, which indicate how far the same has to be drawn out for different enlargements. The avoidance of any shaking of the apparatus during exposure is absolutely necessary. Any, even the slightest motion shows in the enlargement in a heightened measure, and produces a want of sharpness. Care should be taken to have a solid basis, and run- ning about, and opening and shutting doors, &c., must be avoided. Sometimes a vibration is caused by the opening of the objective. I am in the habit of altogether dispensing with a cap, and admit or exclude the light with a small piece of blackened pasteboard, which is placed in front of the negative, and can easily be taken away for the purpose of exposure. I have still to remark that it is advisable to subject the transparent positive, which has been ob- tained in the first operation , to careful retouching before we take a new negative from it. In this manner negatives can be made, ENLARGEMENTS. 199 which, even in an artistic view, surpass the original. From an en- larged negative the positive is made in the usual manner. 2. THE DIRECT COPYING PROCESS. The enlarged image is projected at once upon sensitive paper , and either printed completely or brought out by development. In the latter case a feeble light will suffice ; in the foimei a "very in- tense illumination of the negative is necessary, and this is accom- plished by the rays of the sun , which either directly, or with the aid of a reflector, fall vertically upon the negative. In both cases the rays are concentrated with the aid of a large condensing lens. Enlarging apparatus has been constructed for this purpose. Dependence upon solar light is generally a great drawback to this kind of work, particularly in northern latitudes, wheie the ia^s of the sun possess but feeble power. For such regions the em- ployment of a printing process with development will recommend itself. In selecting the negatives for enlargement it must be observed that every, even the smallest, fault is magnified, and hence such negatives must be real ne plus ultras as regards sharpness, clear- ness, softness, and purity of the glass. It is customary to employ negatives for the direct copying process, which have not been var- nished, as the delicate impurities which are suspended in the var- nish exercise an injurious influence, besides the great heat of the concentrated solar rays is apt to soften the varnish. For moderate enlargements a long camera of large dimensions is sufficient ; for larger sizes it is better to use a dark-room which has especially been constructed for this purpose, but unless there is a great demand for these pictures its construction will not pay. In order to give the reader an idea of an enlarging establishment I will publish below the description of Monckhoven’s apparatus. The same is placed in a dark-room of from 13 to 16 feet in length ; the window faces almost south ; in front of it is a mirror constructed entirely of iron. By a rack and crank movement such a position can be given to the latter that the reflected lays will fall almost horizontally on the condensing lens of the solar camera. The movement of the mirror is very convenient. It is only neces- sary to move it about every 20 seconds, in order to keep the rays constantly in the same direction. Fig. 63 represents the solar camera with the sideboards removed so as to show the interior arrangement. 200 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY The lens A B is the condenser, the diameter of which varies ac- cording to the power of the apparatus. Its curve is so calculated that its spherical aberration is reduced to a minimum. At the distance of its diameter a second lens is placed, very thin and of the form of a watch crystal, which compensates perfectly the spherical aberration of the first lens. It follows that the field of illumination is not, as in the old apparatus, stronger on the margins of the negative than in its centre, but perfectly even over the whole surface of the original ; for every separate point of the margin is penetiated only by a single bunch of rays, and thus, in the dialytical apparatus, the margins of the enlarged pictures are rendered as sharp as the central parts, which is not the case in the old apparatus. Ihe oiiginal picture, II /, is so cut down that only the part which is to be enlarged remains, and is placed into the conus of rays. Formeil) the great heat which was concentrated on the negatives was apt to break them. By introducing the arrangement illustrated in the figure this is obviated. The negative may be of an} r size, and its enlargement on a sheet of given dimensions, sensitized with chloride of silver, always requires the same space of time. Hence, when we have a negative of one- fourth, one-third, or card size, and wish to enlarge it to a bust pictui e of life size, on a double sheet of one metre, the time re- quited will be the same as if the whole figure were enlarged on a sheet double the size. The objectives are of peculiar construction, and are provided with central or back stops, which intercept the diffused light with- out detriment to the light of the condenser. The objectives are movable, and admit of the enlargement of any negative between one-fourth and one-half size, on albumenized, Fig. 6ft. ENLARGEMENTS. 201 or salted paper, &c., as well as on collodion. Other objectives can be combined with the apparatus, which admit of the enlarge- ment of negatives of {, &c., sizes, with the same rapidity and completeness. The American enlarging apparatus is much simpler than Monck- hoven’s. It consists of a large box, which, by a rack and pinion Fto. 64 . movement, is directed towards the sun. The condensing lens is placed at d; the rays of the sun fall vertically upon the latter. The mirror (which alwa 3 7 s absorbs light) is, therefore, omitted as useless. The objective is placed in the box at b in such a manner that a cone of light is concentrated upon it. 1 he negative c is placed in a frame in front of the objective (between d and &). This frame can be moved with a rack movement for the purpose of focus- sing. The picture is projected on a movable drawing-board at the back of the box. Through a small door at the side the printing process can be watched. Mr. Roettger, in Philadelphia, manufac- tures these. ENLARGEMENT BY DEVELOPMENT. There are two different ways of obtaining a large positive from a small negative. The direct enlargement , and the production of a large negative on collodion or paper, which is well retouched and printed in the ordinary manner. The small negative which is to be enlarged is placed in the appa- ratus ; the enlarged image is projected on sensitized bromo-iodized 202 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. albumen paper. The exposure in the apparatus requires from fif- teen seconds to several minutes, in fact until the feeble outlines of the picture appear. The following bath is necessary: White of egg, beaten to a froth, and cleared, . 100 parts. Distilled water, . 1000 “ Iodide of potassium,. . 15 “ Bromide of potassium, . 15 “ Or, Se ™ m . 1 ounce. Iodide of potassium, 10 grains. Bromide of potassium, 6 “ The paper is floated on this bath for three minutes, dried, and pre- served in a closed portfolio. For sensitizing it is floated for three minutes on the following silver bath : Distilled water, 1000 parts. Nitrate of silver, 70 “ Glacial acetic acid, 70 “ While still moist, the paper is dipped in a bath of: Distilled water, , 1000 parts. Citric acid, 4 “ Pyrogallic acid, 2 “ The picture develops in a few minutes ; it is then placed in a bath of hyposulphite of gold, and left in it for five minutes, and washed. The composition of the fixing bath is : Water, 1000 parts. Hyposulphite of soda, 100 “ Chloride pf gold, ^ “ Generally speaking enlarged pictures are inferior in beauty to those which have been taken directly. In America I have seen the best solar enlargements. MICROPHOTOGRAPHY. Every naturalist knows how tedious it is to draw the enlarged pictures of different objects which we see under the microscope, and how much such copies often vary from the originals. These circumstances have for a long time induced such men as Bertsch in Paris, Highley in London, Curtis in America, and Kellner in Germany, to employ photography for making pictures of microscopic objects, and they have succeeded in producing splendid “ microphotographs.” The process which these gentlemen employ has only partly be- come known to the public. Bertsch and Highley used a kind of solar microscope or magic lantern, where the screen is replaced by a sensitive plate. Such apparatus was exhibited in the Industrial Exhibition in London. The price was about three hundred and fifty dollars. Although such apparatus produces excellent results, still its use is attended by many difficulties. One is compelled to carry the object from the observing apparatus to the photographic apparatus, and it is often extremely difficult to find the place of the object which had previously been observed. The author tried to dispense entirely with the expensive appa- ratus, and to take directly the pictures which the observing micro- scope reveals. As an example, he placed the mica of South Burgess, which is so curious on account of its Asterismus, on the stage of a Schick microscope, and placed the instrument horizontal. In this position he combined it with a small photographic camera; the latter had a simple achromatic lens (a so-called landscape lens) of about four inches focus. The two instruments were so placed that their optical axes coincided , and the object glass of the camera almost touched the eye-piece of the microscope. When, with the concave mirror attached to the microscope, the solar rays were thrown on the object, a clear picture of the crystals contained in the mica appeared on 204 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. the ground-glass. With the rack adjustment of the microscope, a sharp image was obtained and a photographic picture taken. The experiment succeeded perfectly, and furnished, after twenty-five seconds exposure, a sharp picture of the crystals, magnified five hundred times. This method of making microphotographs is so simple that any one can piactice it who is at all familiar with photographic opera- tions. It requires no other apparatus than a simple camera with a landscape lens. It can be adapted to any microscope which is suf- ficiently strong in light, and gives, accordingly as the ground-glass is more or less removed from the object, views which are equal, or laigei 01 smaller, than the directly observed image. Two precautions should be observed in making such pictures : The lens of the camera must not have a chemical focus, and the pictuie should be taken in a room which is not exposed to any vibration. The picture may also be taken when the instrument is placed in a vertical position. In that case the camera must also be placed vertically in order that the two optical axes coincide. I published this method in November, 1862 , and have frequently practiced it. The illumination offers some difficulty in so far as a quantity of unnecessary light is easily thrown into the object-glass of the mi- croscope, which materially disturbs the purity of the picture. The best way to concentrate the light is by placing the object at the apex of a cone of rays, the axis of which coincides with the axis of the microscope. With opaque objects this danger does not exist. The illumination is made with a condensing lens (bull’s eye). The abo\ e stated simple combination of the microscope and the camera has the other advantage, that the cobweb lines are visible in every picture, and that a difference in the chemical and optical foci of the microscope itself does not amount to much, provided that the camera lens is free from this error. But when the cobweb lines are not necessarily required, we can operate with the microscope alone. The lens of the camera is re- moved ; the tube of the microscope is placed in the opening of the camera ; all extraneous light is excluded by means of a cloth, or a sleeve, which is nailed on to the camera, and its other end tied to the tube of the microscope. When the micrometer screw of the microscope is now gently turned in a direction to remove the object from the object-lens, the image will suddenly appear on the ground-glass as the image pro- MICROPHOTOGRAPHY. 205 duced by the objective of the microscope is enlarged and projected on the ground-glass by the ej^e-piece. Unfortunately a chemical focus becomes rather annoying with this method. By removing the ground-glass further from the object, we enlarge the image. The extent of the chemical focus is easily ascertained. I employed a microscopic photograph by Dancer of Konigsberg. The picture itself was an albumen positive, about the size of a pin’s head, and placed between thin glass ; under a microscope with a power of one hundred diameters, it appears as a plain, legible in- scription — the inscription on the tombstone of General Dickson — which is arranged in about the following order: To the memory of William Francis Dickson, Major in Her Majesty’s 62d Regiment of Foot, and eldest son of General Sir Jeremiah Dickson, K. C.B. He died a soldier’s death before Sebastopol, June 8, 1855, having been killed early in the morning of that day, whilst gallantly holding the quarries against repeated attacks of the Russians, &c., &c. I laid this photograph on the stage of the microscope, not flat, but inclined by placing pieces of wood under one end. The di- rection of the lines remained horizontal, but the line vertical to it formed with the horizontal plane an angle of 30°. By this arrange- ment the distance of the lines from the combination of lenses was a different one for each line, and it was not possible to focus sharply more than one or, at most, two lines. With the Schick combina- tion of lenses, 1 + 2 + 3, I focussed sharply on line 8, and took two pictures. On both pictures line 5 appeared black and sharp instead of line 8. This demonstrated a chemical focus. To measure this difference, and to compensate for it, I used the micrometer adjustment of Schick’s instrument, by which the stage of the in- strument can be elevated or depressed, and by which the fine ad- justment is made. From the above experiments it becomes evident that in order to obtain a sharp picture of line No. 8, I must focus on line No. 5 ; or if I focussed on line 8, I must turn the micrometer screw until line 5 appeared sharply defined in the field. I have measured the ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 3 ) ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 ) CO ( 8 ) ( 9 ) ( 10 ) 206 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. revolutions, and found that with G. Rose’s microscope it amounted to 50°, and with Dove’s microscope to 35°, for the combination 1 + 2+3. These measurements are easily made by placing under the head of the micrometer screw a paper circle, which is divided by radii from 5° to 6°, in such a manner that the centre of the circle coin-' cides with the prolongation of the axis of the screw, and by filing on the head of the screw a line with a file. By placing the eye vertical over the head of the screw, it is not so very difficult to note the change on the divided paper circle. After having measured the focal difference, two new pictures were taken ; line No. 8 was sharply focussed, the micrometer screw was sufficiently turned to compensate for the chemical focus, and now line 8 appeared sharp in both pictures. Another picture of the whole slide placed horizontally and taken wdth a magnifying power of 25, and the above correction gave a sharp picture of all the lines. With the microscope the focal difference of every combination must be ascertained by experiment. For low powers the differ- ence is small ; a six-fold magnifying power (lens 1 of Schick) shows scarcely any chemical focus. I would recommend this simple method of ascertaining the chemical focus, not only to persons who photograph with the mi- croscope, but also to all practical photographers. For the latter, a sheet of clear printed matter, placed on a board, will suffice. The board is placed opposite to the camera, not at right angles to it, but at an inclination of from 60° to t f0°. The camera is placed at such a distance that the resulting picture is about natural size. Ihe lens is focussed on one of the middle lines, and we examine afterwards which line appears the most sharply defined. STEREOSCOPIC PICTURES. To obtain stereoscopic pictures two different views of an object are necessary, — one a little more from the right than the other, the second a little more from the left. 1 hese pictures can be made (1), the simplest way, with an ordi- nary camera, which is placed on a stand with a broad top-board. Ihe board, B (Fig. 65), is placed vertical to a line which is drawn from the observer to the object. We either take a camera with a movable plate-holder, with which two pictures can be taken in succession, or we employ a camera STEREOSCOPIC PICTURES. 207 with a movable object-lens and internal divisions (it, Fig- 65). Such a camera is first placed on the right side of the board towards the groove. The right-hand picture is taken on the left side of the plate, looking at it from the rear. Next the camera is placed on Fig. 65. the other side from 5, and we take the left side of the object on the right side of the plate. That the camera retains exactly the same distance from the object is very necessary, and the boaid should be placed very firm. The binding-screw, /v, of the camera passes through holes bored in the board, or runs in a groove, in order that the position of the camera may be fixed at any time. The length of the board for distances of about twenty-five feet is about a & foot. With nearer objects it is less. With great dis- tances we take four to five feet and even more. When too much length has been given to the board for near objects, they will appear unnaturally solid, while the reverse produces pictures that are flat. This method will not do for moving or living objects, as these are apt to change their position, and the second picture, even if it should be sharp, would not be in its proper place, and would appeal- distorted in the stereoscope. Even in landscape photography this method has great drawbacks, as the illumination will sometimes change between the taking of the first and second picture. The second method is with a camera with two tubes. With it both pictures are taken at the same time. A change in posi- tion or illumination has no influence here, as both pictures are taken simultaneously ; but as the tubes cannot be very far removed from one another the right and left view differ very little, and the dis- tances do not appear very solid. In Germany we use the German and English boxes for this work. A very practical camera for stereoscopic work is the one called the u Philadelphia Box,” made by the American Optical Company, 208 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. New York, and one of which was presented me by the Scovill Manufacturing Company. It consists of a rigid front part (Fig. 66), and the back part Z>, which moves back and forth on the platform. It also has fronts for the tubes. The focussing is done by moving the back part over the brass guides, G G , and securing the ex- act focus by using the fo- cussing screw, F. The opening and shutting of the tubes is done with a cloth, the common method, I find, in America. Some of the foreign boxes have an instantaneous front, which moves around an axis, and which can be rapidly raised and depressed by turning a knob. The exposure can, ot course, be lengthened at pleasure. The whole arrangement fits only loosely on the objective, and is easily removed. The front board with the stereoscopic lenses is also easily detached and re- placed by another board carrying a single lens. This same arrange- ment may be applied to the American boxes when necessary. The inside of the camera is divided by a movable piece or dia- phragm A (Fig. 66), which moves in a groove, and which doubles on itself in shortening the camera, and lengthens when the camera is pulled out, so as always to completely divide the camera into two parts. Fig. 66 represents the box as it is used for ordinary stereoscopic woik. The platform is hinged so that it may fold up compactly; the bellows is rubber ; the swing-back, which is indispensable for land- scape work, is attached ; the front raises and lowers, and the holder is made to fit on pins, which is far preferable to a holder which slides. I he ground-glass is hinged fast. Fig. 61 represents the box turned over on its side, for the purpose of making an upright single view with one tube, as recommended by Wilson. The partition or dia- phragm A (Fig. 66) is removed, so the plate is not obstructed or divided. C is a clasp which holds the holder in place when the exposure is being made, and at E is a clasp and screw, which keep STEREOSCOPIC PICTURES. 209 the holder at a proper swing or angle when it is necessary to use the swing-hack. G G are the metal guides; D D screws which bind the platform to the box when in use ; F the focussing screw. The plate-holders have corners of solid glass on which the sensi- tive plate rests. Drawings of them will be found on page 47. The lenses which may be used with this camera have an opening of 1 \ and 1^ inches, and from 3^ to 6 inches length of focus (cal- culated from the back lens). They should be provided with stops ; the sizes so ar- ranged that with each one twice as long a time of ex- posure is required as with the next larger one. But stops are only necessary for very near objects. Long distances we can work with the full opening. The above-described screen for taking instantaneous pictures offers some difficulties. Great care has to be observed that in moving it neither the tubes nor the camera are shaken. The taking of instantaneous pictures requires steadiness and skill. Lately another instantaneous shutter has been invented, which is warmly recommended by Remele.* It consists of a wooden box which is placed over the tubes. In the box is a curtain which, by being pulled over the tubes, shuts out the light. This can be done rapidly or slowly, as circumstances may require. This arrange- ment admits also of giving different lengths of exposure to different parts of the same picture; for instance, the sky and distant parts of the landscape may receive a very short exposure, and the fore- ground considerably more without interrupting the pulling of the curtain-string a moment. With many landscapes for the longer exposure of the foreground, and the shorter time given to the sky, it is of great importance, particularly with distant views. With a lid the illumination would have to be an average one, or the middle parts of the picture would be correctly timed, while the background * Remele’s Handbook of Landscape Photography. 14 210 THE PRACTICE OP PHOTOGRAPHY. and sky would be completely over-exposed, and the foreground, which generally shows some foliage, would be wanting in detail. By giving a short exposure to the sky the most beautiful cloud effects can be obtained. The pictures which are made with the above curtain arrangement show a beautiful harmony, and many faults in the illumination which we see on other pictures are entirely avoided. Rouch has constructed a screen for instantaneous pictures which has two shutters instead of one, as in the other arrangement. These shutters turn around a small axis, which is provided with teeth which connect them with a swivel on the centre of the box at each side. It is evident that when the upper shutter is turned with the knob the lower shutter will have to turn also, and that both must move in the same direction. When the arrangement is closed by the upper shutter then both shutters will stand verti- cal above their axis ; when the knob is turned backwards the lower shutter will be depressed, and the tubes will be opened, but will be closed again immediately when the upper shutter places itself in front of them. The movements of the apparatus are simpler than those of the Dallmeyer instantaneous shutter, but it requires skill and steadi- ness to operate them. Braun, in Dornach, manages the opening and shutting of the tubes in a peculiar manner. He closes both tubes with a black cloth which he holds flat in the hand ; he removes it rapidly, and replaces it as rapidly again. This movement, however, requires much practice. For portraiture the lenses should be 2£ inches distant (the dis- tance of the eyes). For landscapes a greater distance is desirable. English mechanics have placed the lubes on boards which can be moved in a horizontal direction , which admit of their being placed a little closer together or a little further apart. Of course the shut- ter arrangement is not always applicable to this arrangement. All kinds of lenses are used for taking stereoscopic pictures : 1. Portrait lenses, where a quick-working lens is desired (for moving objects, portraits, instantaneous views, &c.). 2. Doublets, aplanatic lenses, correct wide-angled lenses, where correct drawing and a large field of view is desired. Vertical po- sition of the camera is necessary. The tube must have an arrange- ment by which it can be raised and lowered, in order that the pic- ture on the ground-glass may be centred. By raising the tubes; STEREOSCOPIC PICTURES. 211 the sky will become larger, by lowering them the foreground will increase in size. 3. Landscape lenses, where a little distortion does not amount to much. The methods of operation are in no way different from the ordi- nary methods. Plates should be selected which are a little larger than the picture is to be. In this way spots at the corners are easier avoided. It should also be observed that plates taken in the double camera show, when seen from the glass side in an upright position, the right side to the left, and the left side to the right. They must, therefore, be cut apart, and their positions reversed. When this is done at once with the plates it will afterwards no longer be necessary to do it with the prints. When, however, the pictures are farther apart than 2^ inches, which is the ordinary stereoscopic distance, it is better to print them together, and to re- verse them when ready for mounting. The difference in the amount of light in two different lenses is often a great drawback, as they will yield pictures of different in- tensities, and one is compelled in such cases to stop the one lens until it corresponds in intensity with the other. INSTANTANEOUS PICTURES. There was a time when instantaneous pictures were the theme of every-day conversation, and when they gave rise to the most wonderful illusions. The representative Faucher made, in the Prussian Chamber of Deputies on July 1, 1869, the following re- marks : “ We have now instantaneous pictures. By this process por- traits can be stolen, and perhaps the most extraordinary precau- tionary measures will be necessary to guard against such a theft ; perhaps it will finally be necessary to wear a mask.” These rumors probably owed their origin to the splendid stereos of Braun and Ferrier with walking figures, carriages in motion, horses, &c. The public as well as photographers considered it possible to produce instantaneous pictures in the atelier. Even photographers advertised themselves in the papers as “ instanta- neous photographers,” and very often we heard in those days the exclamation, “ Yes, if I had his collodion,” as if everything de- pended on the collodion. I have already mentioned in another place that the production of instantaneous pictures is only possible under certain favorable conditions : (1) a good collodion ; (2) bright light ; (3) a lens that 212 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. gives a great deal of light ; (4) a new and pure silver bath ; (5) a strong developer. But even to this day we hear of instantaneous portraits. “ There must be something in it,” say a great many; and here we must refer to an episode in the Berlin Photographic Society, when Mr. Ahrens put the question, “ What is a photographic moment ?” The answer was, “ Three seconds.” Of course, instantaneous pictures have been taken in much shorter time than this, but what are they like ? In a good portrait we want modulation. This can only be ob- tained by a skilful direction of the light, which must not pour in from all sides, but must be excluded here and there. But this diminishes the quantity of light, and does not suffice for condition No. 2. On the other hand, clearness in the shadows is demanded ; this can only be obtained by long exposure. Hence, the real instantaneous pictures, taking for instance a space of time not more than one-tenth of a second, are reduced to landscapes with their accessories in clear, sunny w 7 eather. And for this purpose we recommend 1. Collodion made by any reputable party, or, when the pho- tographer wishes to prepare it himself, make it according to formula on page 96.* 2. Apparatus — a double objective of short focus giving much light, 'with an instantaneous shutter. 3. Bath, 1:10, freshly made of crystallized silver and one-quarter per cent, of the salt of iodide of potassium. 4. Developer after Remele: viz., 5 iron, 11 glacial acetic acid, 100 water (alcohol is not always necessary). Some “instantaneous collodions ” of commerce are apt to work foggy with this developer. In that case more acid should be added. 5. Intensifying and fixing as usual. The same conditions apply to taking portraits with a short exposure in the atelier. To any one who wishes to make instantaneous pictures, I would recommend to place himself in such a position that the majority of the movable objects approach or move away from the apparatus. In this case the change of position is apparently the smallest ; in taking a view of a street we should look into the street lengthways, and marching soldiers we should take in the direction of the march. * When the following conditions are observed, a less sensitive collodion will suffice. PHOTOGRAPHIC EXCURSIONS. 213 TENT WORK AND PHOTOGRAPHIC EXCURSIONS. In the previously described operations, the existence of a labora- tory in which the plates are prepared and developed has been con- sidered as a matter of course. But there are plenty of cases where such a laboratory does not exist, and where pictures have to he taken at a distance from the atelier of the photographer. A dark- room has to be prepared before the photographer can commence to work. In case of necessit}' anj r inclosed space that can he made light-tight, can be used as a dark-room. Braun, in Dornach, does not hesitate to use cellars, stables, outhouses, &c., as dark-rooms, but it always depends on how far we can work here without being molested by dust or stench. As such a space cannot always he improvised, the travelling photographer will do well to carry his own dark-room along. For such a portable room nothing is better than a tent, which, above everything else, must be light-tight, solid, easily put up, and sufficiently comfortable. As one of the most useful dark-rooms, we can recommend those of Rouch, in London (Fig. 68). It consists, when folded up, of a square box, which, in Fig. 68. the annexed figure, is visible as a simple box. When opened, the lid forms the horizontal base of the tent, and the box, the sides. To the latter, the tent cloth, consisting of double black and yellow 214 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. material, is nailed ; two iron rods are fastened in the box, and the tent cloth is thrown over it ; it hangs down as an open bag, in which the operator ha§ to creep. The whole is supported by a firm tripod. The bath is put in a black bag, which descends in front. A square hole, covered with double oiled silk, serves for a window. The best way of arranging this is to make a window which can easily be opened. On the top of the tent a water box is placed, which communicates with the interior by means of India-rubber hose ; the latter is provided with a stop-cock. The sides of the tent are best provided with pockets to receive small articles, such as plate-holders, dippers, &c., &c. The base is a folding rubber dish, which has an outlet to the exterior. The tent is placed in a shady place, protected from the wind. In very warm countries sprinkling the tent cloth, and the bag containing the silver bath, with water is an excellent way of keeping both cool. A similar tent construction, and one which is very solid, is de- scribed by Ph. Remele in his excellent Handbook of Landscape Photograph}^. The tent is the invention of L. Herzog, in Bremen. The most essential part of the whole tent is the box necessary for the transport of apparatus and chemicals. The box is opened and four strong wooden legs are attached ; on the top a folding iron rod, a, is pushed in the correspond- ing holes and fastened by the rods, &, b ; over the rods a tent cloth is thrown, and with hooks it is fast- ened to the e} T es, c, c, c, above, below, and on both sides. The tent cloth should be double at the sides, that it may be hooked in the interior of the box in a similar manner. At the lower extremity the tent cloth has an opening ; the operator creeps into it and ties it light-tight around his waist. At b there is a door in the box, which can be opened and shut, and here a window of oiled silk is fixed in. The best material for a tent is the so-called India-rubber cloth ; the hooks are fastened to it with gum bands. Overhead a yellow window of oiled silk is placed. This tent is remarkably solid, PHOTOGRAPHIC EXCURSIONS. 215 offers much space for working, and has, finally, the advantage that one can work in it without wasting a drop of silver or any other solution on the floor. For excursions all the other objects necessary for operating have to be taken along. I carry a basket with a lid, which is divided in squares ; in such a basket all the requisites are easily packed, and the bottles are much less exposed to breakage, owing to the elasticity of the basket, than they would be in a wooden box. Four-cornered bottles are preferable to round ones. The packing of the bottles requires the stuffing in between of some soft mate- rial ; the best for this purpose is rags or paper. (Tow or hay will make too much dust.) The following articles are necessary for a photographic excursion : (a.) For short excursions. 1. Tent. 2. Camera box. 3. Tripod for same. 4. Connecting screw for 2 and 3. 5. Plate-holder, with frames. 6. Tubes, with camera box fronts. T. Focussing glass. 8. Plate box. 9. Cleaned plates. 10. Duster. 11. Dipper. 12. Two focussing cloths. 13. Water-can and rinsing- water. 14. Bath or dish. 15. Alcohol lamp. 16. Photogenic lamp. IT. Negative bath. 18. Collodion. 19. Developer. 20. Silver for intensifying. 21. Alcoholic pyrogallic solu- tion. 22. Distilled water. 23. Cyanide of potassium. 24. Some empty bottles and corks. 25. Yarnish for negatives. 26. Graduate. 2T. Two funnels. 28. Alcohol. 29. Filtering paper. 30. Writing paper for scum- ming the bath. 31. Matches. 32. Scissors and knife. 33. Twine and pins. 34. Developing glasses. 35. Bottle of nitric acid for acidifying the bath. 36. Bottle of bichloride of mer- cury* for removing stains from clothing. 3T. Towels. For longer excursions, all the above articles should be taken o > * The sublimed mercury is excellent for this purpose, as it does not destroy color 216 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. along in duplicate, so that in case of loss they may be replaced, besides, 1. Scales with horn dishes. 2. Weights. 3. Nitrate of silver. 4. Sulphate of iron or sulphate of iron and ammonia. 5. Glacial acetic acid. 6. Pyrogallic acid. 7. Citric acid. 8. Plain collodion. 9. Iodizer. 10. Salts of iodine for sensitiz- ing. 11. Alcohol and ether. 12. Nitric acid. 13. Rags for cleaning. 14. Cleaning vice. 15. Tools (screws, screw-driver, diamond for cutting glass). 16. Permanganate of potash for restoring the bath. The quantities of the articles must depend on the length of the excursion. For excursions it is to be recommended to test all the mixed chemicals at home, and only to take them when they are in perfect working order. All the articles should be compared with the list before starting, as it often happens that thoughtless people arrive at their destination and have to go home again because some simple article was left behind. That working in the field or tent requires much more circum- spection than in the atelier is self-evident. The difficulties become sometimes insurmountable. Rust, heat, and the want of suitable water, wind, cold, and unfavorable weather. These very often put the patience of the photographer to the severest test. Another point is of great importance, namely, solid apparatus, which can easily be reduced to a small compass. I will describe some such here. Meagher's Travelling Camera .— This camera* (Figs. 70 and 71) which was first constructed by a celebrated joiner, consists of a rigid front piece, u, which is supplied with grooves for the reception of the board carrying the tubes ; the back piece, H, H, is movable, and receives the ground-glass and plate-holder. The focussing is done by the screw adjustment, consisting of an endless screw, s s, and the handle, g. The camera board, which carries the whole arrangement, is divided ; the back piece, B , R, is at x connected with the front by hinges ; a folding support, S, with a screw, r, gives firmness to the whole. For the transport, the bellows is screwed together, that H and v touch each other; the screw at v * The same and similar constructions are furnished in America by the American Optical Company in New York, one of whose boxes I have had groat pleasure and satisfaction in using. PHOTOGRAPHIC EXCURSIONS. 217 is loosened, 5, B is turned upward, and S is folded on the back. The folding up and setting up of this camera is done very rapidl}-. The arrangement at H is very peculiar. The ground-glass is neither Fig. 70. Fig. 71. II removed nor folded back, but the plate-holder is pushed in the slit, m, m; the movable ground-glass, which is kept by the spring/ in its place, is pushed back, but immediately resumes its position when the plate-holder is withdrawn. The camera can be used for a focal length of from four to twelve inches, has a movable division in the centre for taking stereos, and one of them served the Egyp- tian Expedition with best success. The only point to be com- plained of is the want of firmness of the piece S, which is apt to crack when very dry. Besides the ordinary plate-holder, this camera is pi'ovided with an extra one for dry plates. The arrange- ment is fully explained by Fig. 12. Travelling Bath . — This bath, which can be bought of any stock- dealer, consists of an ordinary glass bath, which is placed in a wooden box, and provided with a rubber covered lid, which by tightening a screw fits water-tight. For short excursions this arrangement does very well, but a long contact of the silver solution with the rubber of the lid is apt to exercise an injurious effect on the bath. The methods of operating do not vary from those which I have described heretofore. On Fig. 72. 218 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. account of its keeping qualities, I use in travelling the equivalent collodion (see page 96); the sulphate of iron and ammonia for developing and intensifying ; for fixing, on account of its more rapid action, and because it requires less washing, I use cyanide of potassium. When the last drop which runs from the washed plate has no bitter taste, the plate has been perfectly washed. APPLIED PHOTOGRAPHY. In the previous part of my work, I have explained the opera- tions which are necessary for the production of a negative or posi- tive picture by means of light, without reference to the nature of the object to be taken. Any one who will follow exactly the directions given, may take whatever object he pleases, and will always get a picture, but very seldom a perfect one. Even the beginner will soon find out that the nature of the object has a great deal to do with success, and that this should not be overlooked when we wish to obtain a satis- factory result. Let us attempt to copy an oil painting, or a copper plate print, with an exposure which would be sufficient for a portrait, or the reverse ; let us apply the intensification which is necessary for such reproductions to a portrait, or let us copy a large drawing with an illumination suitable for a portrait. In either case we will be hor- rified at the result. The nature and the succession of the operations remains gener- ally speaking the same, and still every one of them, pose, illumina- tion . | selection of the model , sharp focussing , time of exposure , development , intensification , must in some measui'e be modified ac- cording to the nature of the object to be taken, and unless we pay strict attention to these circumstances the resulting picture will not be satisfactorj^. It is erroneous to think that photography always draws truly. Nothing can be less true than a photograph, when it has been made under circumstances which are not suitable for the object. (See chapter on Aesthetics.) We must therefore go a little more into detail concerning photo- graphic operations as applied to different objects. The field is endless. Sun, moon, and stars, animals, plants, minerals, products of art, and products of nature, the microcosmus, and the macrocosmus, all, all belong to .the realm of photography. So I am excusable when from the multitude of things I only make a selection. To treat of all exceeds the limit of oiy work. REPRODUCTIONS. 219 I will select those objects the representation of which is prin- cipally the work of the practical photographer — drawings, paint- ings, models, machinery, architectural objects, landscapes, and portraits. I will speak first of the more mechanical work of “ reproductive photography ” and the copying of technical objects, and I will re- serve the consideration of portrait and landscape photography, which is more of an artistic character, for the second part ot my work. I. PHOTOGRAPHIC REPRODUCTIONS. ( Copying of drawings, prints, oil paintings, &c ., &c.) 1. PREPARATION OP THE ORIGINAL. Care should be taken to get a clean original. A drawing with dirty finger-marks will yield a dirty negative. Lead-pencil lines in India-ink drawings are also annoying, and unequal color of India- ink is objectionable. Photography reproduces everything, the most trifling thing, and the latter very often in an unpleasant de- gree. Drawings and prints should first be rolled in the press, to do away with the inequalities of the paper. Pictures which are framed under glass should be taken out of the frames, as the glass is apt to produce disturbing reflections of light. It is well known how much difficulty some yellow prints or spotted drawings will cause. To overcome this, we should resort to retouch- ing the original. Mr. Scamoni, photographer in the imperial print- ing establishment, at St. Petersburg, writes about it as follows : Every yellowish or otherwise disturbing spot is carefully covered in the spaces between the lines with flake white, and the shadows are wherever it is possible intensified. When the paper is rumpled and not smooth, it should be firmly pressed in a frame against a piece of plate-glass, through which, when it is carefully placed, and with a steady light, very good photographs can be taken. That the ob- ject is absolutely plane is always necessary, otherwise the picture will show distortion. 2. ARRANGEMENT. The reproduction of drawings is the simplest of photographic work. Elaborate arrangements are unnecessary. Perfectly smooth stretching on the drawing-board, perfect parallelism between the board, the ground-glass, and the apparatus, are the principal con- 220 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. ditions of success. When these conditions are not observed, dis- tortions in the drawing will necessarily be the consequence. The lines, wdiich are parallel amongst themselves, converge towards the top or the sides, when the apparatus, instead of being absolutely vertical to the axis of the drawing, is turned a little upwards, or downwards, or sideways. To secure this parallelism in the position, larger establishments have made arrangements to keep drawing-boards and apparatus always parallel to one another. Such an apparatus (Fig. 73) consists of a strong support, which rests lengthways on four or more feet. On one end the drawing- Fig. 73. board is attached at right angles to the metal guides which are fastened to the sides of the support, and along which the camera moves. When necessary, one end can be left open to admit the operator for the purpose of focussing, and the support can be made rigid by uniting the feet near the floor, and strengthening the guides on which the camera moves, by iron braces. On the copying- table, in the Royal Technical Institute, in Berlin, the drawing- board is moved by cords, which run over rollers underneath the camera. The drawing-board should be divided into square inches, which, combined with the square inches which are marked on the ground- glass, will be a great help in determining whether the picture is exactly square and of the right shape, and it affords at the same time a means for determining the proportion, whether or It is also very practical to provide this apparatus with a scale at the sides divided into inches, by which the distance between the draw- ing lens and ground-glass can be determined beforehand. The distance (with a given lens) necessary for making a natural size, double natural size, or half size picture, can be marked down once and forever, and all the trouble of finding out the position is avoided in the future. REPRODUCTIONS. 221 The dimensions of these supports must necessarily depend on the extent of business of the atelier. It must be observed that for natural size drawings, the ground-glass must be removed from the lens the distance of twice its focal length. Smaller supports of this kind should be placed on rollers, as it facilitates their removal from place to place. In an atelier where reproductions are an exception, simpler arrangements will answer every purpose. In this case the drawing is simply placed on a stand as de- scribed (page 42), and the camera is placed opposite. The distance necessary for getting the correct size of the picture is first found approximately ; next the board and camera are placed as nearly vertical as possible by placing the sides exactly parallel with some vertical architectural part, as, for instance, the corner of a room ; finalljq to get the camera and board parallel to one another, the lines of the boards of the floor will serve as guides. It requires some patience, but the result is better than with a spirit-level. With oil paintings a different course has to be taken ; to avoid glaring reflections, they have to be inclined forward in the same way as they are generally hung on the walls of galleries. 3. ILLUMINATION. For copying of drawings, the illumination is of the simplest kind ; nothing is necessary but an even light over the whole sur- face. This takes place only when the angle of light is nearly the same for every point of the picture. Any one who has studied the principles of illumination, as laid down on page 27, will easily satisfy himself on this point. A front light, which passes over the camera on to the drawing, is the best. Care should be taken that the camera does not throw its shadow on the drawing. Sometimes the paper is rough ; each fibre or each depression will cause a shadow. When this is the case, the drawing should, if possible, be passed through the rolling press, or else a sheet of white paper should be laid in front of it and used as a reflector. More annoying than unevenness is gloss, as with varnished pictures, and particularly oil paintings and photographs. The easel with the picture should be placed where this disturbing reflec- tion does not appear. Opening and closing of the curtains some- times gives material advantages. To be quite sure that it does not disturb, the eye should be placed in front of the lens and the picture examined. This will show the exact effect of illumination. Oil paintings are placed at an angle, as stated above; the axis of 222 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. the apparatus is placed vertical to its surface. Sometimes direct sunlight is of advantage, particularly when age has darkened the picture. The illumination should be so arranged that, besides the gloss, the shadows of heavy layers of paint are avoided. 4. THE LENS. All kinds of lenses are used for reproductions. With art sub- jects, copper-plate prints, oil paintings, a slight distortion does not matter much, particularly when only the central part is used. For mathematically correct pictures, however, an absolutely correct drawing lens is required, and as such a one I recommend the Stein- heil Aplanatic Lens, or the Ross Doublet (see page 72). Portrait lenses which have a great deal of light are only neces- sary for dark oil paintings to shorten the time of exposure. Objectives of feeble light, as the pantoscope (which also draws cor- rectly), can only be employed with a bright light. With the full opening, the lens is focussed on the centre of the picture (with Steinheil lens), or half way between centre and margin (with the Doublet lens) ; after this has been done the stops are inserted. For line drawings, a stop should be used so small that the picture is sharp to the edge. For oil paintings, larger stops should be used, to gain light. 5. PROTECTION OF THE OBJECTIVE AGAINST FOREIGN LIGHT. This protection is absolutely necessary for drawings, where it is the object to obtain clear lines. A black box, and a piece of paste- board in which a hole has been cut, just large enough to show the drawing, but excluding everything else, is placed in front of the lens. A wide tube placed over the objective, in which another tube moves, like a telescope, is also of advantage. Landscape lenses do not require this protection as much as portrait lenses. The whole field of view of the lens should not be used, as this would expose one to a considerable loss of light towards the margins. 6. TIME OF EXPOSURE. The correct time of exposure is not so easily determined in reproductions. We must distinguish between black line drawings without half tones, copperplate prints, and pictures with half tone. When the former are exposed too short a time, the picture develops slowly and looks pale ; all the lines are transparent, and REPRODUCTIONS. 228 it requires long intensifying, and the film is apt to become brittle and to split. When the exposure is too long, the black lines will finally exert some action, and will appear, after development, weak and foggy ; they will print gray instead of black. Generally speak- ing, in line drawings, over-exposure is worse than under-exposure ; just the reverse from landscape or portraits. Drawings with half tones require longer exposure than line drawings, in order to get details in the shadows. Drawings with half tones and lines give the greatest difficulty. When we expose for half tones , we get partially veiled lines ; when we expose a shorter time, the lines will be black, but the half tones will be hard, and the shadows will be wanting in detail. Of the two evils, we should choose the least. Draughtsmen, who work for photogra- phers, should accustom themselves to drawing with deep black lines on white paper. Gra} 1- lines give the most trouble ; for instance, the glossy lead-pencil line. Copperplate prints also cause some difficulty; generally they are only medium black, and we often get copies which are blacker or weaker than the original. To copy oil paintings correctly was formerly considered an im- possibility. The colors, of course, cause much difficulty ; a sun of chrome yellow will appear as a black spot, an ultramarine blue sky will appear white, not to speak of other colors. The most obstinate color is brown, and brown photographs are only with great diffi- culty reproduced. Fortunately the reflected light from the colored surface acts a little, but generally speaking a longer exposure will be necessary with oil paintings than any other pictures when we wish to get detail in the shadows and in the inactive working colors. Every picture should be examined most carefully after development. When the details in the shadows are insufficient,, the time of exposure should be increased ; sometimes this does not insure success with such colors as umber and dark green. Under these circumstances nothing remains but to replace the missing tones by negative retouch. Clouds and sky have often to be strengthened by negative retouch, as they will be visible in the negative, but do not offer sufficient contrast. In regard to the technicalities of negative retouch, I would refer to the chapters on that subject in the splendid work of Mr. Ayres, entitled “ How to Paint Photographs.” 7. METHODS OF OPERATION FORMULAS. The different operations should be carried on with the formulae given above. For half tone pictures and oil paintings, I use a 224 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. strong developer; for line pictures, I take a feeble developer (see page 98). For long exposures particularly, precautionary measures are necessary. The repelling action of the collodion film is very apt to produce marbled stains. Collodions from which the bath runs off in greasy lines are not suitable for long exposure. On the other hand there are “ moss stains ” caused by particles of dirt from the plate-holder which become imbedded in the film, and finally drying spots, by actual drying of the silver solution on the plate, in which case the iodide of silver is dissolved by the concentrated bath. To prepare wet plates for a long exposure, Carej^ Lea recom- mends, in the “Philadelphia Photographer,” the following: 1. Marbled stains, which show themselves particularly in the centre of the plate, are best avoided by dipping the plate into the silver bath immediately after collodionizing. 2. Spots, which in spite of these precautions will appear, and particularly at the lower corners, are best avoided a. By the use of two baths — an old one for sensitizing, and a new one for dipping the sensitized plate after it has been taken from the first bath. b. By placing a thick strip of blotting-paper, which is bent over lengthways in such a manner that one part is about one-eighth of an inch wide, and the other one inch wide ; the part which is one- eighth of an inch wide is placed under the plate, when it is placed in the plate-holder, in such a manner that the plate rests on the thick and narrow layer of paper. The wider part is then placed on the back. To keep the plate-holder clean is a matter of course. By follow- ing these directions an exposure of half an hour or more is possible. Covering the back of the plate with wet blotting-paper, and em- ploying a spongy collodion, rich in bromine, is also a remedy which is to be recommended.- Jabez Hughes recommends, besides the above-named remedies , the employment of washed wet plates. The plates, after they have ■been sensitized, are placed in a large dish with very pure distilled w r ater ; they are moved for about three minutes, the superfluous water is allowed to drip off, and then they are used. Before devel- opment they are returned to the silver bath, and moved in it for at least one minute. In the development, the rapid or slow appearance of the picture is a criterion whether the picture has been over or under-exposed. Intensification is, particularly with line drawings, a point of great REPRODUCTIONS. 225 importance. The plate must be intense enough to offer a consider- able obstruction to the passage of light, otherwise we will get a re- production in which the ground is gray instead of white. Photolithographers and photogeographers require very thick and opaque prints. For this purpose Waterhouse recommends the following method of intensifying: After the solution of pyrogallic acid has been completely removed, the plate is dipped into a saturated solution of bichloride of mercury, and remains in it until it appears almost white (like porcelain) ; as soon as glossy lines appear, the operation should be stopped, and not be carried beyond a dark gray tone. After this the plate is washed, and a solution of sulphate of ammonia is poured over it, which changes the color into a reddish brown, verging on black. When the plate has been well washed, it is varnished in the ordinary manner. After many experiments in India, I found that when citric acid has been employed in the developer, the film shows great inclina- tion to split as soon as the plate is dipped in the bath of chloride, of mercury. I tried to find a substitute for the mercury bath, which, for many reasons, is unpleasant. I employed the following formula, recommended by Mr. M. Carey Lea: Cold saturated solution of bichromate of potash, . 3 fluid drachms. Hydrochloric acid, 1 drachm. Water, 6 ounces. This solution is poured upon the plate after it has been intensi- fied with pyrogallic acid. The color of the film changes rapidly into a splendid lemon-yellow 7 , and the lines seem to become a little clearer. When the solution has been removed by washing, a solu- tion of sulphate of ammonia is employed, and this changes the color into a deep chocolate-brown. The only point which requires particular attention is the washing of the plate after each operation, for when this has been neglected the lines will run together, be covered with precipitates, and the negative will be spoiled. 8. THE PRINTING. Perfect negatives will print easy, and do not require any artificial help. The printing is carried a little into excess, that the high lights may show a little color. In toning, the high lights will become white. Negatives, in which some parts are too thin, others too thick, have to be copied with a mask. The thin parts are copied first ; when ready they are covered with suitably cut pieces of paste- 15 226 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. board, and the dense parts are printed until they reach the neces- sary amount of color. The tone of the picture should be kept very black by employing an alkaline or chloride of lime bath. See page 139. 9. CRITICISM OF THE RESULT. To judge of the result, the severe and critical comparison be- tween the copy and the original is not very difficult with drawings and prints, as both are monochromatic. It becomes more so with oil paintings. With these the effect of color has to be repro- duced by the mere graduation of tone between light and dark. We have to observe at the start that in photography the cold colors (blue) are reproduced too light, while the warm colors (yellow and red) are rendered too dark. This contrast has to be equalized if the picture is to be true. We have, so to say, to analyze the colored original. We have to ignore the color, and have to observe what should be light, half shadow, and dark ; what should be prominent and what not. When, in a photograph, the proper gradation between light and shade is wanting, the figures will not separate ; the picture, in short, lacks character, and is worthless. Whoever wishes to photograph works of art correctly must be an artist himself, or else submit to the superior judgment of an artist. There are hundreds of reproductions of oil paintings in the market which show light where the original is dark, and vice versa; or where the several figures which in the original are properly separated by contrast of color, appear in the copy as an undefined mass ; or large surfaces show nothing but shadow where the origi- nal is full of delicate detail. All these several points have to be observed, and only by exercising a sound criticism can a satisfac- tory result be secured. Oil paintings, which have become dark by age, and in which the eye does not recognize any details, of course cause more difficulty than new ones. Reproductive photography is a branch which stands on the border between the purely mechanical and artistical activity of the pho- tographer. So far as it is based on artistic principles, it belongs to the chapter on Photographic JEsthetics ; practical considerations induced me, however, to treat of it in the purely technical part of my book. PHOTOGRAPHING OF MODELS, ORNAMENTS, ETC. 227 II. PHOTOGRAPHING OF MODELS, ORNAMENTS, STATUES, WORKS OF ART, MACHINERY, Etc. 1. PREPARATION OP THE OBJECT, AND ARRANGEMENT. It is difficult to find general rules for the parti-colored medley of objects which have been arranged in this chapter, as these have to be modified by every especial case, and I will only try to develop those principles which one dare not neglect in taking the picture of such objects as are placed at the head of this chapter. The rules which are laid down for reproductions also hold good here. Everything which does not belong to the object-proper should be removed, and no pains should be spared to make the object as elegant as possible before proceeding to the taking of the picture. The objects which come under this head are either easily removed (can be transported to the atelier) or not. The latter have to be taken at the spot where they are located, with all the accidental surroundings — landscape background, spectators, &c.; sometimes with an unsuitable or even impossible illumination — in dark cellars, &c. Objects which can be placed in the atelier are best placed in front of a monotonous background (see page 40). According to the nature of the object different shades are necessary. As a general rule, we may state that the object must contrast with the background. They must not be equally light or dark. It will be observed that the background becomes darker by moving it away from the object. This enables us to make a completely black background on the picture with a screen which naturally is only gray. A background which is too dark can be lighted up by a suitable illumination. As a basis we should select a dark table or a support of a sombre color. All other things should be removed. A vertical position is almost a matter of course. The selection of the position of the camera is of much importance. The camera has to be placed at the spot where an expert, but not a photographer, would place himself to get a full view of the whole object. The direction in which the camera is placed should correspond with the direction of the eye of such an observer. It is therefore necessary that the photographer should perfectly know his subject if he wants to select the proper standpoint. Of what use is the most brilliant picture of a piece of machinery when the main things are hidden by secondary matters. Sometimes this may depend on a single wheel or a single screw. It is the same with objects of art. The pho- 228 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. tographer has to study his subject, exactty as the actor has to study the character which he is to represent. Whoever wishes to take pictures of plastic figures must under- stand the plastic ; he must be possessed of artistic judgment, or he will commit gross errors. The same holds good for technical objects, as stores, machinery, tools, and reliefs. Any one, not being an expert in these matters, should at least consult some one who understands it thoroughly. In taking works of the plastic art, he should consult the sculptor ; in taking technical objects, he should consult a mechanic, who will point out to him which parts are essential, and which are not. The engraver has to do the same when he desires to make an engraving of an intricate piece of machinery. The advantages of photographic pictures of technical objects have often been estimated as being of very little value. The reason is that the pictures were made by photographers who did not un- derstand their subject. Not photography but its disciples are to be blamed. My space does not permit me to give detailed instruc- tions to every one who wishes to photograph statues, or machinery, or architectural objects. Fortunately our literature is not deficient in such works, and it is the duty of every one to instruct himself in these matters.* The cultivation of these specialties is the reason why we have nowada}-s portrait photographers, landscape photographers, and architectural and technical photographers. The practical manipulations are nearly always the same ; but the particular success in any one of these branches is based on par- ticular knowledge of the subject-matter. It is not unusual to find that a skilful portrait photographer will make a poor hand at land- scape photography, and a good worker at reproductions will fail completely in portraiture. When the proper side from which the picture should be taken has been found, the distance is the next important subject. When the camera has been placed too near, perspective exaggerations are apt to take place ; even with the best of lenses the nearer parts ap- pear too large. When the camera is removed too far, the relief is apt to seem too flat. The photographer will be very apt to make the former mistake from want of distance, and (when working in a contracted space) he often has no other choice. Vertical position of the camera is generally necessary, particularly when taking tech- nical objects (models, &c.). Under certain circumstances, however, * We would recommend Lflbke’s History of Architecture, also Liibke’s History of Plastics. ILLUMINATION AND EXPOSURE. 229 an inclined position of the camera has to be selected. Take, for instance, a statue on a high pedestal, which we are accustomed to see from below, and which has been constructed by the artist with reference to this position. It would be absolutely faulty if we would copy such a statue in the atelier on a level with the camera. On the contrary, it should be placed high, and the apparatus should point upwards ; by doing so we will only conform to the natural conditions for which the statue has been constructed. We know works of art, as, for instance, the George’s Head, by Kiss, which, when seen from a level, looks indifferent, and only makes a startling impression when viewed from below. We often sin against these principles. Portrait photographers, who are accustomed to incline their cameras on the sitter, too fre- quently apply this position for all other objects. I would here call the attention of the photographer to what will be said in the article on Perspective. 2. ILLUMINATION AND EXPOSURE. T1 e selection of the proper illumination is as important as the selection of the proper standpoint. Artistic objects require analo- gous considerations to portraits (see -(Esthetics) ; technical objects must appear distinct in all particulars ; dark shadows, which are apt to obliterate some details completely, should be avoided. The light of a high atelier, which pours in uniformly, is preferable. Objects which have to be taken in a given locality can of course not be brought into a suitable illumination. We have to w r ait for the suitable moment, and very often we have to assist with mirrors, magnesium light, or other artificial means. By the aid of a mirror sunlight is thrown on the object (it is best to follow the direction of the camera) ; and by slightly moving the mirror the light is passed to and fro over the whole object. Objects which are much hidden can often only be reached by two mirrors, and the light proceeding from the first has to be caught by a second one, and is from it reflected on the object. Of course, with such a process, much light is lost. The time of exposure, for such an illumination, in July, with a Steinheil lens, and third largest stop, is, with a single mirror, about six minutes ; with two mirrors, from nine to twelve minutes ; the object being dark. The following principles of illumination and perspective refer to all objects. The specially noted lifeless models are very different in their character ; sometimes purely artistic, as plaster models, 230 THE PRACTICE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. marble figures, &c. ; sometimes purely technical, as models of ma- chinery ; sometimes of a dark color (cast iron) ; sometimes white (plaster of Paris), How extremely different the treatment of such bodies must bejs self-evident. A white figure requires a dark background, a dark one (bronze or iron) requires a light one ; the former a short ex- posure, the latter a long one. Remember, too, that high lights often make their appearance on metallic objects, and require to be modified by suitable illumination, or by dusting the respective parts with gra}’’ chalk. Still more annoying are colors ; very often we have to distinguish between red cast (copper) and bronze ; both act photographically alike. W e must resort to negative retouch for separating parts which should be kept apart, but which will run together on account of color. For taking buildings in the open air, a light falling from the front at an angle of 45° is the most advantageous. The exposure should be continued until all the details in the shadows appear. 3. LENSES. In the selection of lenses freedom from distortion should be looked for. For objects that give out very little light, portrait lenses should be used ; where correctness of drawing is the main object (machinery), doublets or aplanatic lenses are the best ; with a large angle and short distance, the pantoscope is preferable. I repeat that acquaintance with the object is necessary for the proper selection of the lens. The same refers to stops. It is advantageous to place over a piece of machinery white graduated marks lengthways, perpendicular, and horizontal ; they should be included in the photograph, as with a knowledge of the perspective the dimensions can be reduced from them. The negative and positive process are practiced according to the rules given in previous chapters. A strong developer, however, should be used. THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY, OR PHOTOGRAPHIC AESTHETICS. The photographic pictures, which are obtained by the previously described processes, are made for very different purposes. They are either of a purely scientific or technical nature, such as pictures of microscopic objects, representations of machinery or buildings, architectural plans, &c. In such cases their object is to instruct. Again, a real practical use is made of them when they furnish the basis for measurements, when used as aids in the construction of maps, or when buildings are erected according to the delineations which they represent. Finally, some of the pictures obtained are of an artistic nature, and then they have no other object than the one to please; and amongst representations from nature we have to class portraits and landscape pictures in this category. The question whether photography is an art or not is an idle one. Experience has demonstrated that a sharp and spotless, or in short a technically perfect photograph, be it portrait or landscape, may appear on the one hand untrue, or it may displease w'hen the observance of the laws of the beautiful (which are the cause of our pleasure in thq works of the plastic art or paintings) have been disregarded. That these laws in their generality are not applica- ble to photography, which more than any other art is “ glued to the substance,” is evident. The photographer cannot follow his mind’s ideal flight. The children of his creative fancy enchant us not in marble, nor do they charm us with brilliant hues on the canvas, but his aim is to portray nature ; and the most which can be demanded of him is a beautiful reality, — truth in a pleasing form. Let us see now how nearly photography gives us truth. 232 THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY. PHOTOGRAPHY AND TRUTH. Admirers of photography assert so often that this young art represents the pure truth, the true counterpart of nature. Pho- tography can, indeed, when rightly applied, produce truer pictures than any other art, but they are not absolutely true, and because they are not absolutely true it becomes important to learn the sources of error, and they are manifold. Let us first consider the optical errors. A picture which has been taken with a lens that does not de- lineate correctly, and causes the marginal lines which should be straight to appear curved, can certainly not be called a correct one. Many persons may not notice these distortions, nevertheless they exist. Some will say that a correctly drawing lens will avoid these errors. True, very true ; but let us examine the pictures of high buildings which have been taken with such a lens from a low stand- point. The lines which should be vertical will converge towards the top. Can this be called correct ? But you will say the reason of this is that the camera was not placed level. "Very good ; but let us now try a Globe or pantascopic lens, and take a view of a long street: how the perspective deepens ; how enormously large the nearer houses appear, and how very small are the objects in the distance. Houses that are a hundred feet distant look as if they were half a mile away. Is this truth? No, certainly not; and yet the lens draws correctly, the camera has been placed exactly on a level, and the perspective is mathematically correct. A draughtsman could not make it any better. But where lies the mistake? The angle of vision is too large. Unfortunately, this cannot always be avoided, and curious enough it affects straight lines as w r ell as curved ones. Take, for instance, a pile of cannon-balls. An artist would represent the balls circles. Now take a picture of them with a wide-angle lens, in such a man- ner that they will appear at the edge of the picture, and instead of circles we will have ellipses. Mathematically, this is easily ex- plained. From every ball (A B G , Fig. 14), a conus of ra} r s pro- ceeds to the optical centre of the lens, o, and the plane of the pic- ture intersects them as an ellipse, when it falls in any other direc- tion but at right angles (see the chapter on perspective). A photographer showed me the view of a castle which had been taken with a Globe lens. In front of the castle was a row of statues, and it was really comical to notice how the bodies and faces grew PHOTOGRAPHY AND TRUTH. 233 broader towards the edge of the picture, and the slender Apollo de Belvidere, who unfortunately happened to be at the extreme edge of the plate, had such a broad face, and his body showed such a remarkable rotundity, that he looked like Dr. Luther. Now, is this truth ? Unfortunately these are not the only sources of error ; there are a great many more. Further on in this book, I publish four hea , portraits of the same person. They were taken by Loescher & Petsch, of Berlin, with front-light, top-light, side-light, and oblique-light. In the first picture the man looks dull and stupid ; the second gives him an angry and savage expression ; the third gives him a cunning look; which of the three named pictures is the true one ? Not one of them. The truest representation is No. 4, where a combination of light effects has been employed, and we see that the mode of lighting can also become a source of error. This not only holds good for portraits, but refers to landscapes also. The view from the Rock- usberg, in Bavaria, had often been described to me as most beau- tiful. Accompanied by friends, I visited the spot several times, but we could not see any beauty in the view. At last I visited it again, not as before in the morning, but in the evening, and then the view was charming. But besides the direction of the light being a source of error, there is another circumstance which has much influence on the correctness of photographic pictures. Generally speaking the lights are too white and the shadows are too black in photographic representations. This is a radical error, which has its origin in the nature of the art, and the avoidance of which becomes sometimes very difficult. The error is most strik- Fig. 74. a c l 234 PHOTOGRAPHIC ESTHETICS. ing in taking the picture of an object on which the sun shines with full force, for instance a statue. If we expose for a short time only we get the details of the light parts, but the shadow is a black spot without any design. If we expose for a long time we will get some detail in the shadows, but the lights will be over-exposed to such an extent that all the finer shades will be missing. Is this truth ? These are the reasons why we have so much difficulty in our stu- dios when we wish to produce a properly lighted picture. We keep the lights more diffused and the shadows lighter than what painters would do, and the latter are often surprised when they see a model in the gallery, under such artistically faulty illumination, yield a picture correct in lights and shadows. In taking landscapes, architectural objects, and particularly in- teriors, we cannot control the light with the same ease as in por- traiture. I once photographed a chemical laboratory. The room was large, with an arched ceiling. In the picture you can see the tables, furnaces, retorts, lamps, &c., everything perfectly plain ex- cept the arched ceiling ; this was too dark. I made other attempts with twenty, thirty, and even forty min- utes’ exposure ; at last I saw a trace of the ceiling, but now the objects near the windows were so much over-exposed that all the details were lost. The result was four pictures, not one of which was true. Finally I resorted to throwing reflected sunlight on to the ceiling. This circumstance, that photography reproduces the dark parts too dark, makes itself felt in very simple operations, for instance in the reproduction of prints. A photographer reproduced Kaul- bach’s “Battle of the Huns.” The copy was an excellent one, but the background was too dark, too thick, not hazy enough. The copy was refused, and another picture demanded. The photographer now gave a longer exposure. The background had the hazy appearance of the original, but unfortunately the fig- ures in the foreground, which should have been bold and black, had a dusky gray look. Is this truth ? The artist succeeded finally by retouching the negative. • I have purposely selected simple examples to prove my assertion, that it is difficult to make truthful photographs. But now comes the worst point of all, the different colors. In photography the cold tones will be rendered too light, while the warm ones, such as red and yellow, will be reproduced too dark. As an illustration I may mention the photographic copy of Hildebrand’s painting, PHOTOGRAPHY AND TRUTH. 235 “ Sunset on the Ganges ” — a glowing red sun with burning clouds of chrome yellow on an ultramarine blue sky. And now what does the photograph show ? A black disc surrounded by black thunder- clouds. The sun looks like the solar eclipse at Aden. Is this truth ? Still more striking becomes the lack of truthfulness in photography when the artist attempts the solution of a higher ar- tistical problem. Perhaps the reader knows the pretty little picture called “ A Mother’s Love.” A young mother, in modern costume, sits in an arm-chair reading ; her little son approaches from behind, and, standing on a chair, embraces her. Surprised and delighted the mother drops her book and kisses the child. A photographer took it into his head to reproduce the picture from living models. He easily found a pretty girl suitable to rep- resent the mother. A boy, a chair, some decorations, and furni- ture, were not hard to procure, and the group was placed in position. The mother in effigy readily complied with the direc- tions of the artist, and made a face which perhaps might express motherly affection. The boy, however, had different ideas. He did not feel himself drawn towards his pseudo mother, and pro- tested energetically against any familiarity. It required a good, sound thrashing to bring him to terms. With these preliminaries time had been lost. The mother begins to feel uncomfortable in her forced position, with the head partially turned backwards, and finally the photographer “fires away.” The picture is shai*p, fully exposed, without spot or blemish. The models, to their great joy, are discharged. A print is made, and what is the result ? The boy embraced the mother with a face in which the thrashing is plainly visible, and with a look that seems to indicate a desire to choke her, while the mother looks much more like saying, “ Charley, you are very naughty to interrupt my reading,” instead of “ Dear little pet.” Can any one say that such a picture expresses the in- tention of the photographer ? Is the above-described an expression of the title “A mother’s love?” Any one will fail to see the in- tention of such a picture. The whole, although a true copy of the group as placed before the camera, is, as an expression of a mother’s affection, a photographic lie. Such pictures we find by the thousand. Ten years ago these sins were committed over and over again by the makers of stereo- grams, and when such pictures meet with approval we can only blame the corrupted taste of the public for it. But it will be said that the photographer cannot be blamed for the lack of truth in such a picture. His models should be censured for it. Still it is 236 THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY. the fault of the photographer. Pictures in which the models do not absolutely come up to the intentions of the artist should not be made at all. Tbejr do not lie within the province of photography. But there are other characteristic cases of photographic untruth for which the models cannot be blamed. Stimulated by the beautiful pictures of Claude, Scliirmer, or Hildebrandt, a photographer at- tempts to take a sunset. Of course the brilliant glowing sun requires only a very short exposure ; what kind of a picture will he get ? A round, white spot surrounded by some glowing clouds will be all that is visible. All the objects in the landscape — trees, houses, men — are all totally under-exposed. The road, the village, the wood, and the meadow, all so beautiful to the eye, are nothing but a confused black mass without any outline. Is such a pictui'e true ? Even the enthusiast in photography will not dare to say yes. Cases where glaring contrasts in light and shade make the pro- duction of a true picture impossible are very numerous. Most of the photographs of the Ro}'al Monument in the “ Thiergarten ” belong to this class. The monument is beautiful, but the back- ground of the trees is without detail, without half tones, an unde- fined mass, anything but a representation of the splendid foliage which charms the eye at this spot. Still more numerous are the photographs of rooms, where the corners in which objects are plainly visible to our eye are repre- sented by pitch-dark night. Other cases of photographic untruth are still more characteristic. Observe that mountain scene. A village inclosed on either side by wooded hills occupies the middle ground. Houses are pictur- esquely scattered amongst the trees on the hillside. A chain of finely-curved mountains in the distance, the peaks of which are glowing in the evening sunshine, forms the background of this wonderful picture. Only one thing is annoying. A dilapidated pigsty, and next to it a heap of straw, are in the immediate fore- ground. A painter who would paint this picture would either omit the objectionable feature altogether, or keep it so subdued that it would barely be noticed. How is it with the photographer ? He cannot remove the sty*. He looks for a different standpoint; but now the trees cover a large portion of the landscape. He takes the view, sty and all, but what kind of a picture will he get ? The sty, which is in the immediate foreground, on account of its proximity, appears of gigantic size. The distant landscape, the main object , is small and insignificant. PHOTOGRAPHY AND TRUTH. 237 Still worse is the effect of the pile of straw in front of the sty. It occupies one-fourth of the whole picture. Being the most brilliant object in the whole picture, it draws at once the eye of the spectator and calls it away from other more im- portant points. The effect is unpleasant. It annoys the photog- rapher, and does not appear to be a representation of the landscape for which it was intended, but a picture of the pigsty. The secondary matter has become the main object, and if any one writes under such a picture “A Yiew of Dornburg,” it is simply untrue. It is untrue, not because the objects represented do not exist in nature, but because the secondary matter is represented too plainly, too glaring, and too large, and the principal objects appear dim and unimportant. We now touch a sore spot in photography ; it draws the main objects and secondary matters with equal distinctness. To the plate everything is indifferent, while the true artist, in producing pictures of nature, will give prominence to the characteristic points, and subdue and moderate the secondary matters. With artistic free- dom he can act and do as he feels best, and he is fully justified in doing so ; for as he gives the characteristic points only, and sup- presses what is secondary, his work will appear more true than photography, which reproduces everything with equal distinctness, and sometimes gives the greatest prominence to the most trifling matter. Reynolds, in speaking of the portrait of a lady, where an elabor- ately painted apple tree forms the background, says, it is the picture of an apple tree, and not of a lady. The remark is applicable to a great many photographs. It is a cardinal fault that they elevate secondary matter to the most prominent position. We see a con- glomeration of bright furniture, and only on close inspection we will find that a man is placed amongst it, for whose portrait the picture is intended. We notice a Avhite-spotted dress, and finally discover that it belongs to a girl whose head is just visible. We see a park with fountains and other fixings, and on very close inspection we notice the black coat of a man dimly contrasting with a piece of dark shrubbery. Perhaps some will raise a great outcry when I ascribe greater truthfulness to the unrestrained art of painting than to photography, which generally is considered the most truthful of all the picture- producing methods. That I refer only to the works of first class artists is a matter of course, and it is one of the greatest merits of photogi*apliy that it has made the daubs of art, which were for- 238 PHOTOGRAPHIC ESTHETICS. merly sold at every corner, an impossibility. I consider it my duty to call attention to the sources of untruth in photography. Only when we have learned to know them, and to appreciate them, will we learn also to avoid them ; and those who have been taught to watch for them feel surprised and astonished how problems of the most simple nature offer difficulties in regard to truth. It is the duty of the photographer to weigh well the difficulties which he has to encounter in the production of a truthful picture. His picture to be true must give prominence to the characteristic points, and such as are secondary must be made subordinate. The insensible plate of iodide of silver cannot do this. Controlled by immutable laws, it delineates everything that is presented. The photographer accomplishes his purpose partly by a suitable preparation of the original, partly by a proper treatment of the negative. It is necessary, however, that he should know the char- acteristic and secondary points of his model. He that has not got an eye for these is not a photographic artist. As the sculptor and painter, in order to produce a life-like and beautiful picture, must pay attention to the minutest details of every feature of the face, every effect of light and shade, every fold in the drapery, so must the photographer study his model as closely as possible in features, carriage, and dress. The forte of the two arts, painting and photography, is however entirely different. The object of both is to produce a beautiful picture on a plane surface, which must not appear flat, but round and real. The painter can produce upon his canvas from an imperfect model an artistically beautiful picture, and improve upon the original by idealizing. The photographer has to work differently. He cannot, like the draughtsman, make changes in his picture (a few trifles excepted). To secure beauties in his picture, thej^ must be present in the original. It is therefore his object to beautifully pose and light his model, and in short to arrange a living picture. Not until this has been done is the mechanical process put into operation. It is by no means true that only beautiful originals will furnish artistically perfect pictures. Every original has its faults. The photographer must reproduce his original from the point where it shows the least faults, or he must cover them by artifices. If he fails in this, the very best of chemicals, apparatus, and formulae, will fail to produce an artistically beautiful picture. ON LIGHT AND ILLUMINATION. Light is the element of life, the drawing-pencil of the photog- rapher. It is the brush with which he paints. For him a thorough knowledge of this element is as important as it is for the painter to possess an exact knowledge of his colors. At Resent it is our object to explain the aesthetic principles of illumination. Like the painter or draughtsman the photographer has for his purpose the production of a picture on a plane surface which shall give the beholder the impression of a reality. The figures must not appear flat like the paper which bears them, but plastic, with foreground, middle, and background. There are two ways of producing this apparent solidity. The first of them is by means of perspective. All objects of equal size appear smaller in nature when seen at a distance; the draughtsman, bearing this in mind, decreases the proportions of his figures with the distance. He succeeds thus in producing the impression that the objects are both near and distant, although all the figures in his picture are equidistant from our eyes. Pictures, in which these laws of perspective have been neglected, for instance, old pictures of Van Eyk, Kranach, &c., appear flat. Hence arises the importance of a knowledge of perspective both to the painter and draughtsman. The second method of giving a plastic appearance to flat objects is the proper distribution of light and shade. * We draw two right-angled triangles alongside each other, and both will appear as flat figures. As soon, however, as we shade the one with India ink, so that the shadow will gently decrease from the side towards the centre, the triangle, although always re- maining a plane, will appear like a cone, and*On the other hand round objects will often appear flat when these contrasts of light and shade are wanting. 240 THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY. The principal method of making plastic pictures is, therefore, by the proper employment of contrasts, and the artist has them in his power, but he must know how to use them. We will now proceed to the special consideration of these contrasts. Let us consider first the raw material with which we paint, — the light. This ink, in its original purity, is so powerful that we can- not w r ork with it in our studios when we wish to produce real half- tones. In direct sunlight we will get a portrait glaring white on one side, and sharply defined, not gently shaded, and black on the other. Even when the sunlight does not strike the model directly, the reflections from windows and other objects would become a source of great annoyance. Even curtains afford only a partial protection against this direct sunlight. A considerable portion of it pene- trates, destroys the shadows, and makes the picture weak. For this purpose we not only exclude the direct sunlight from the model, but also from the atelier itself, by making the latter face towards the north. We go further and construct sunshades, work- ing only with the diffused light of the clear or clouded sky. While, generally speaking, the rays of sunlight may be consid- ered as being parallel, those which emanate from the sky take all possible directions ; horizontal when they come from the horizon, vertical when they come from the zenith. These circumstances are important. While in consequence of the parallelism of the sun’s rays, a body on which the sun shines will show sharply defined con- trasts of light and shade, a body illuminated by diffused light will show these contrasts obliterated. This is the reason why, under such circumstances, full and round bodies appear flat, as can easily be observed by looking at an intricate building on a dull day. It is no wonder that photographs taken on such a day always have a flat appearance. The portrait of a person would have an equally flat appearance if it received light from all sides of the atelier. This shows the necessity of employing a one-sided light when we wish to produce plastic pictures. To make such pictures we supply our glass-houses with curtains, which we can raise or lower at pleasure. Such a one-sided light gives a living variation of light and shade. It does not follow, however, by any means, that the shaded side of a picture should not receive any light at all. On the contrary, it must be slightly illuminated, so that by chemical action too strong contrasts may ON LIGHT AND ILLUMINATION. 241 be modified, that the details may become visible, and that there may be a gentle transition from light to shadow. In which direc- tion then must the principal mass of light strike the person ? Different cases are possible. The light may strike the person from the front, i.e ., coming from the direction towards which the point of the nose is directed; or sideways, i.e., horizontally at right angles to the previous direction, and finally from above or in the direction of the longest axis of the body. We have to discriminate, therefore, between front-light, top-light, and side-light. Let us suppose now that the glazed side of the atelier is hung with curtains, and that a small slit is opened at the side of the person. If the person itself stands with its front at right angles to the glazed side, it is evi- dent that it will be struck by the side-light. Turning now the chest and the head towards this light, it will be changed on the person to front-light. This shows that the direction of the light re- quired depends on the position of the person, and it becomes neces- sary to define the expressions top-light, side-light, and front-light, in order not to be misunderstood ; and as I shall in future fre- quently use these terms I will give the following explanation : Fig. 75. L S Suppose the paper be the floor of the atelier, and the square A the photographic apparatus, P the person. The direction of the head and chest is a matter of indifference. We call the light which strikes the person in the direction of the line V V (the connecting line with the apparatus) Front-light ; the light which is horizontal at right angles to this, in the direction of S S, we call side-light ; the vertical light from above the top-light. Besides these three principal directions the light can strike the person in other directions, for instance obliquely in the direction of the line L L, as front side-light, or obliquely from above, as front top-light, &c., expressions which are easily understood. It is now my object to describe the effect of these three principal direc- 16 242 THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY. tions of light, — Front-light, Side-light, and Top-light. I give three photographs, one of which has been taken with front-light only, the other with direct side-light, and the last with top-light. With . Fig. 76 . 0 S V 0 S V the aid of these pictures we will see what a powerful effect the direction of the light has on the relief , the color of the picture, the resemblance of the features , and the whole character of the phys- iognomy. V was taken with front-light : the size of the opening opposite the sitter was 7 square feet; the distance from the model 15 feet.* S was taken with side-light : size of opening 5 square feet ; dis- tance from the object 8 feet. 0 was taken with top-light : size of opening 3 feet 8 inches wide, and 5 feet long ; the distance from the head of the object was 6 feet. 1 consider it necessary to remark that the three pictures are portraits of the same individual, that they were taken immediately one after the other, and excepting the light, under circumstances as nearly identical as possible. I make this remark because the surprising difference which these three pictures exhibit — only in consequence of the different illumination — has caused many who have seen them to express doubts that they really were pictures of the same person. The pictures were taken with a “Postage-stamp apparatus” for twelve heads, an apparatus which is very convenient for the pro- duction of quantities of pictures of this kind, and which is similar to the American Optical Company’s Gem Camera. * The person was placed on the southern side of the atelier, the face turned towards the northern glazed side, at which the apparatus was placed. ON LIGHT AND ILLUMINATION. 243 Now let us first consider the effect of the different lights on the relief of the face. We notice in 0 that the eyes are deeply sunk in their sockets, the nose is sharp and projecting, and casts a deep shadow ; the fleshy parts below the cheek bones recede downwards, the mouth is large and sharply cut, while the beard projects thick and bushy. In S the beard appears thinner, the parts under the cheek bones are much more flat, the roundness of the cheeks is wanting, the eyes do not appear so sunken. On the other hand we notice wrinkles above the nose, on the forehead and also below it, which in 0 are almost entirely obliterated. In S the wrinkles under the ej-es and at the sides of the nose are less clearly defined than in 0. The whole face in S has, owing to the rather sharply defined limits of the shadows, the appearance of a box illuminated from one side, and the edge of which is turned towards the eye ; the whole middle line of the face projects much more than in 0. The face is goat- like. V is like a box seen from the flat side ; the sockets of the eyes are scarcely indicated. Of the characteristic lines, which in 0 and S start from above, below, and at the side of the nose, not a trace is left. The beard and the clothing appear as flat as the face. The nose is gently lost in the eyebrows, and forms with these two sym- metrical hooks. The mouth appears small when compared with 0. The whole is like a board on which the main outlines have been drawn. This shows that with the aid of illumination we can obliterate wrinkles and canities in the face , or can make them ap- pear more prominent. When we consider the effect of the illumination on the color of the different parts, we will notice at once the great difference in the color of the hair and the beard. They appear strikingly gray in the photographs 0 and S, where the light falls on them (the most so in 0), while in V the color is black. In 0 we recognize each individual hair, and also on the light side of S , while in V the hair and beard form a homogeneous black spot, with very little detail. The cause of this want of detaifis the equal illumination which every hair receives from the front, so that we can only see the light side. It is quite different with side-light, where we see on every hair its bright and its shaded side, and thus each hair becomes dis- tinct from the other. The hair in V appears much darker. The reason of this is that the model was much further removed from the light when the picture was taken. This is also the reason why 244 PHOTOGRAPHIC AESTHETICS. the coat appears much darker, and why the background in V ap- pears much lighter than in S and 0, simply because it received as much light as the sitter (except where the background is shaded by the person), while in 0 and S the background stands a few feet back of the light opening, and receives only that part of the light which either vertically or horizontally strikes the person. The bright color of the coat in 0 (the coat of the sitter was black) must be noticed. The top-light acts with the greatest chemical in- tensity ; hair and forehead are unusually bright with this light, while the shadows are very deep. This demonstrates that with the aid of illumination we can modif y to a considerable degree the color of hair , background , and clothing. The next point to be considered is the effect of illumination on the character of the picture; and the most superficial observer must admit that a great many, who believe that a clean and neatly exe- cuted picture must always be a good likeness, are grossly in error. The eyes in 0 look dark and threatening, and this sinister ex- pression is increased by the sharp projecting nose, the dark-colored compressed corners of the mouth, the prominent cheek bones and nostrils, which throw deep shadows. How harmless and even sleepy the picture in V appears. The shadeless eyes look fishlike and expressionless, the lines which give energy to the face are wanting, and the mouth is without expression. The picture S is intermediate between the two. It is not so in- sipid as F, nor so sinister as 0. The contrasts of light and shade give a lively expression to the face, in which the two wrinkles on the forehead look as if they were produced by a cunning thought ; only the shaded side appears still a little too threatening when compared with the light side. The picture is more characteristic ON LIGHT AND ILLUMINATION. 245 than the other two, but it does not show us the man as he is ; it is too angular, and he looks too much like a goat. We see from the above how the whole character of a face may be varied consider- ably by illumination. We can make a gruff and unhappy-looking face appear to look cheerful and pleasant, and we can give an energetic expression to a sleepy-looking countenance. But my readers will ask, Which of the three pictures shows the true character of the man ? and I answer, None of them. That every one may get an idea how the man actually does look, and form an idea how the three different modes of illumination have changed the expression of his countenance, I add the portrait which all his friends consider a perfect likeness, and a true repre- sentation of his character. (Fig. 77.) What I have said above will, I think, be sufficient to impress the reader with the importance of illumination in photographic pictures. Each of the three different modes of illumination — front-light, top-light, and side-light — gives a different character to the model. It is the duty of the photographer to make pictures in which the true character is reproduced. How may this be accomplished ? The best results are secured by a combination of all the three different modes of illumination — i. e., top-light, front-light, and sidelight, or what is the same thing, a front top-light from an oblique direction. In this case the main quantity of light which strikes the person proceeds from an open- ing which is a few feet in front, above, and either to the right or left, in such a manner that the light strikes the sitter at an angle of about 45°.* This method of illumination produces the rotundity and relief of the model in the richest manner, and painters make it the founda- tion of their shadow constructions. We find this illumination also in most of the pictures of our prominent portrait painters, simply because it appears to our feel- ings as being the most natural, and there are many photographers who will, as if by instinct, place their model in exactly that corner of the atelier where this mode of illumination is produced by local * In an atelier which is hung with curtains as illustrated in Fig. 78, such an arrangement of the light is easily managed by removing some of the top curtains, L , L , and the adjoining side curtains, L ' , L ,f , a few feet in front of the person, K. The other openings, 0, 0, S, S, are for lighting the shadows. See below. 246 THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY. causes. Others, again, have put up curtains and removed them again, have changed their glass-houses, until finally their pictures assumed that natural appearance which depends altogether on the illumination. With such a light, and with the combination of the three different methods, the fourth head, in Fig. IT, is taken, and an attentive study of the same will soon demonstrate this to a careful observer. When we consider the effect of such a normal light on the model, we will find that on the forehead (for instance, on the right), the strongest light, while on the opposite side, on the lower jaw, we will find the deepest shadows. There are a number of ateliers where this mode of illumination is employed with every model, without exception. The model is placed in a spot from which the side and top- light is excluded by curtains and masonry ; consequently he will receive light mainly from the front. Such an arrangement may suffice for a great many faces, but it cannot be denied that by employing the same mode of illumination invariably, the pictures will become monotonous. In photographs this monotony is even more objectionable than in oil paintings, as the painter by the aid of colors has the means to produce a great variety of effects. It is quite different with the photographer. In his hands light and shade have to replace the effects of color. He can replace variety only by a skilful man- ipulation of the illumination, and the more or less inclined angle under which the light strikes the object is here of primary im- portance. We have to mention that a top-light, 0, or a side-light, S (Fig. 18), proceeding from a gi’eat distance, produces a similar effect to that of a front-light. A top-light of large dimensions, immediately above the sitter, is in its effects similar to a side-light, a circum- stance which must be borne in mind in an atelier which is wide, but comparatively low, and vice versa. A very high side-light will pro- duce similar effects to a top-light, as can easily be noticed in any very high atelier. It follows that as we increase or diminish the size of the opening, L , A, or as we approach it or remove the sitter from it, we can give to the light more or less the character of front-light, top-light, or side-light, and modify the character of the model to a consider- able extent. Suppose we have a well-marked, energetic, and expressive face. By removing the sitter from the source of light, we give the char- ON LIGHT AND ILLUMINATION. 247 acter of front-light to it, and infuse mildness and softness into the harsh features. And so the other way, when we have a flat, sleepy, and otherwise little-marked face, we should give to the light more of the character of top-light, and the face will get more energy and life. With certain small-cheeked faces, the employment of side-light is to be fecommended. It lights up the cavities under the cheek bones on the light side, makes these concave parts appear more rounded and full, while the details on the other side are lost in shadow. For ladies of a “ certain age,” who sometimes become very an- noying to the photographer, the employment of a gentle front-light is to be recommended. It will light up the wrinkles and remove the unpleasant shadows. Yes, we can place the whole face in the shadow (which of course must not be too dark), only throwing a few light-effects over the most prominent parts, and still get good effects. Generally speaking, we may lay down the rule that we must illu- minate all the elevations and depressions which we wish to modify, in such a manner that they throw no shadow, or only a very small one, and vice versa. It is self-evident that we dare not go too far in this respect. We can modify the shortcomings of the original, but we must not ob- literate them altogether, for in that case character and likeness would be lost. How far we may go in this respect cannot be deter- mined by any rule, but the thinking artist must be guided b} 7 his sight and the gift of observation. The observing artist will also notice a slight difference in the brightness of the hands and the face. In every portrait the face is of paramount importance. It must receive the principal light , and all the other parts must he kept subdued and subservient to it. Nothing can be more repulsive than those pictures where the arms and hands appear as prominent white spots, strongly con- trasting with the drapery and clothing. The upper part of the body should be kept lighter than the lower parts. With dark screens , which are placed a few feet from the sitter , and partially shade the hands and feet , this is easily accomplished. Loescher & Petsch use such a shade-screen with great advantage, particularly in avoiding over-exposure of white dresses. The screen is a frame five feet wide, covered with dark cloth, and moves on rollers. The upper part is movable around a horizontal axis, so as to give more 248 PHOTOGRAPHIC ESTHETICS. or less inclination. It is self-evident that the production of such light-effects requires a skilled eye, which will appreciate the slightest gradations from light to dark. For training the eye in this respect, I would recommend the photographer to practice on plaster of Paris busts. Such a bust should be placed in the atelier on the same spot where the sitters are placed. All the light should be excluded by closing all the curtains, and now, by admitting the light first from one direction, then from another, now from above, and next sideways, the effect on the face should be carefully watched. The variations are not only surprising, but entertaining and in- structive, and whoever will take the trouble to photograph them, and make a short memorandum of the mode of illumination, can make for himself an album of studies that will materially assist him in selecting the proper mode of illumination for the living model. But he must not forget that one effect is not suitable for all, and the illumination should be adapted to the sex, age, and physiognomical peculiarities of the sitter.* All that I have shown as taking place on the human face repeats itself on all other forms. Just as cavities or prominences on the human head can be obliterated or exaggerated by the mode of illu- mination, so also can we modify the appearance of other plastic objects, as buildings, bas-reliefs, machinery, &c. It is the rule to illuminate in such a way that the details ivhich we desire to show prominently in the picture are by the illumination brought to the proper prominence. Art objects make the choice of illumination easy, in so far as all artists place their models under a light which strikes the object at an angle of 45° obliquely from above. Whether the obliquity is from the right or the left side is still a question, and when the artist himself does not give the direc- tion, experiment must show from which side the light acts the most favorably. W ithout subjecting oneself to examination and criticism, we will never obtain a satisfactory result. This oblique light with an inclination of 45 degrees will, under most circumstances, be the most suitable. Two more points have to be considered, — the size of the object and the distance of the source of light, i. e., the window of the atelier. Suppose we have two pillars, one of large diameter, a, and * About certain light-effects, such as the popular “Rembrandt” effects, I will speak further on in the chapter on Backgrounds. ON LIGHT AND ILLUMINATION. 249 a small one, 5, placed at equal distance from a window. It wall be easily seen that the first will show a different illumination from the second. The light plays more around the smaller pillar on the shady side than on the large one. The shad} r side contracts while the light side expands. If we wish to photograph the smaller pillar, un- der similar conditions of light and shade, we have to decrease the light opening. This is the reason why an illumination which has been arranged for a life-size model is unsuited for a smaller object. The second point is the distance from the glass wall. We have shown above that the brilliancy of a point, which re- ceives the light of the sky through a window, decreases as the square of the distance from the window increases. With a very large window opening this decrease is not so strong, but still very perceptible (see page 21) when we consider that the shady side of a model is only illuminated by the light reflected from the back wall of the atelier. It becomes evident that the contrast between light and shade will be stronger as we approach the model to the glass wall ; we have it in our power, therefore, to increase or decrease these contrasts by placing the model in different positions. It must not be overlooked that, generally speaking, contrasts are stronger in photographic pictures than they appear to our eyes. Very often the shaded side, which to our eye represents all the de- tails, appears on the photograph as a pitch-black spot. I his is most striking with yellow, green or red objects, less so with white ones, or cobalt and ultramarine blue. A plaster bust will generally, even without artificial arrange- ments, show good details in the shadows, but it is different with human beings, and still worse with dark-colored objects, such as iron and bronze. When it is intended that the shadows of such objects shall not appear altogether black, we must either introduce direct light on the shadow side or arrange reflectors to throw the light in that direction. In an atelier with a north front the illumination of the shadows by direct light is an easy matter. Generally the model is placed near the glazed wall, in the place where in Fig. 15, the white pillar has been placed. By opening the curtains, L' L" V" (Fig. 78), to the right, we get an illumination that would be suitable for the painter. Fig. 79. 250 THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY. In order to illuminate the shadows properly we open on the other side of the atelier part of the top-light curtains, 0 0, and side cur- tains, S S, Fig. 78. A quantity of top front-light pours in upon the model, which by itself would produce a picture like V, page 242, but combined with suitable side-light produces the result on page 244. To the eye the effect is visible on the model. By increasing the amount of front-light the time of exposure becomes relatively shortened. The light and shade contrasts become more and more decided by approaching the model to the glass side of the house. The illumination by reflecting screens is very generally employed. When the atelier is small and the rear wall light, the latter will act as a reflector, and many photographers will only notice this fact when they are suddenly placed in another larger atelier with a dark rear wall. The floor of the atelier acts similarly to a reflector. It lights the lower shadows of the model. This effect is also very often overlooked. Every object in the atelier, provided it is not absolutely black, acts more or less as a reflecting screen. Those photographers who boast that they work without reflecting screens may make a note of this. For a movable reflecting screen I would recommend a frame, B, which revolves around the horizontal axis, a b, and is moved from place to place on rollers. Others are so arranged that they can be placed high or low. One side of the frame should be covered with tin foil, the other with white paper. This secures two surfaces of different reflecting power. The frame is placed on the dark side of the model, and moved in different directions until the eye ob- serves that the shadows become lighter. To the beginner 1 would recommend experiments with a plaster bust. The effectiveness of the screen increases the nearer we place it to the model. As regards the most suitable position of the re- flecting surface we soon notice that, even with a dull surface, such as paper, the action is analogous to a mirror, i. e., the angle of in- cidence is like the angle of reflection. Besides such reflecting screens the thinking artist can employ many other accessories for the same purpose ; a sheet of white paper, an open book placed upon the table, a hidden mirror, and other trifles, will often produce very favorable effects. Fig. 80. OF THE PERSPECTIVE. 251 OP THE PERSPECTIVE. Fig. 81 . When we look at a cube (Fig. 81), the sides of which being of equal length, we will find that they appear to our eye of very dif- ferent length. The surface fronting our eye appears as a square ; the others become shortened in a remarkable manner. The sur- faces appear quite irregular ; the parallel lines converge towards the point o. Similar appearances we notice on all other bodies. The human arm hanging down along the side of the body, or the pillar, S, standing upright, appear of full length, while the arm stretched towards us, or a pillar lying in a horizontal position, L , appear u foreshortened.” The parts appear contracted, and finally we see, instead of the shaft of the pil- lar, only the circular base, 6, which either appears circular when we face it directly, or as an ellipse (which it is not in fact), and the parallel sides of the pillar con- verge to a point. The reason why we do not notice this falsehood (for such it is) is simply because we are used to it. We know from experience that the arm pointing towards us only appears short, and that it is longer than it appears to us. We know also that the apparently converging railroad tracks run ac- tual ty parallel. We constantly correct, by our experience, the ap- pearances of our vision. A child without experience will try to feeize the moon. It is the duty of the painter and the photographer to represent the foreshortening correct!}', i. e., as they appear to our eyes ; and when this is not done the picture will be untrue. The perspective teaches us the laws of foreshoi'tening. Our eye is a camera obscura with a simple landscape lens. We know from optics that the image of a point lies on the straight ray which is drawn from the point through the centre of the objective. Where this line, which is called the principal ray, cuts the plane of the pic- ture (the ground-glass in the camera or the retina in the eye), we will find the picture of the point in question. The image of a straight line is where the rays which proceed from the different points of the line, after passing through the centre of the lens, intersect the ground-glass. These lines form a plane in the optical centre. This plane cuts the plane of the ground-glass in a straight line. The 252 PHOTOGRAPHIC AESTHETICS. image of a straight line is, therefore, in our eye a straight line, and the image of a plane triangle is a plane triangle. When the plane figure on the retina, or the ground- glass, is parallel to the object, then, according to well-known stereometrical laws, the image will appear similar to the original figure. Suppose that a plate of glass has been placed in front of the eye vertical to its axis. Then the rays which proceed from an object, abed , will intersect the plate in the figure a' b' c' d' (Fig. 82). When we con- struct such a figure for a given point of intersec- tion and a given plane, then the drawing, when it is brought to the correct position and distance in front of the eye, will give exactly such an image as the objects themselves. This explains the de- ception that a correctly constructed plane picture appears in relief. A picture drawn in the above- described manner we call a perspective drawing. It is self evi- dent that we must look at it under the same conditions under which it was drawn. Suppose that A B CD, Fig. 83, is the ground plan of a house, B the ground-glass, 0 the focus of the rays, abed the image of A B CD; then it is necessary that I should place my eye at 0 in order to see the perspective picture, abed, exactly as the object itself. When I move the ground-glass closer to the eye, for instance to B' , it is easy to see that the rays must cross each other in the eye under an entirely different angle from those which proceed from A B CD; and they cannot produce a correct impression. The same would take place if I should remove the picture-plate away from the eye (for instance to B"). Hence it follows that every perspective drawing should be looked at from the standpoint from which it was taken in order to produce a cor- rect impression. Photography is a perspective drawing where the point of sight lies in the object-lens ; and hence the eye must be placed at the same distance as the object-glass (i. e ., its focus). When this is not done the impression is untrue. Fig. 83. OF THE PERSPECTIVE. 253 There are, however, lenses of four inches focus and less ; at so short a distance it is impossible for the naked eye to see a draw- ing, or anything else. Generally we look at them at a distance of at least eight inches, and the consequence is that the photograph Fig. 84. produces an unnatural impression. This is very often the case with pictures taken with wide-angle lenses. When we look at these from too great a distance, O' f, we will notice the too great expansion of the marginal parts. The fore- ground and the sides appear disproportionately large. When they are placed at the correct distance, 0 /, which is equal to the focus of the lens, then the angle of vision, G A 0, of the too wide mar- ginal parts, A C, B D, will shrink considerably, as they will be seen considerably foreshortened (see above), and the picture will make a correct impression. These errors do not show themselves in so striking a manner with pictures that have been taken with lenses of a smaller field of vision. When, for instance, the angle is equal to 60°, it does not make much difference whether we look at the picture from the single or double focal length, as a glance at the small marginal piece, A g, of a field of vision of 60°, will demonstrate. This is the reason why we do not notice the false perspective, so com- mon in portraits which have been taken with lenses of a short focus, as the field of vision of these lenses is less than 60°. But other abnormities will manifest themselves which we must not overlook. When we take from the point P (Fig. 85), the picture of a pillar, the ground section of which is, A B C D, the lens to have a focus of seven inches, we obtain a picture in which the sides A B and G D are visible. When we substitute, however, a lens of three and a half inches focus we would have to approach the object in order 254 THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY. to obtain a picture of the same size as with the 7 inch lens. For instance, from the point O', the sides A B and G D are no longer visible ; the whole character of the picture becomes changed. When we substitute a human face for the pillar it is evident that, with the lens near to the object, the cheeks will contract and appear too narrow in proportion to the length of the face. Fig. 85. The correctness of this conclusion the following tw r o illustrations will demonstrate. They represent two pictures of the bust of Apollo. The bust was placed exactly vertical, the camera likewise, and the direction of the line of vision carefully adjusted. The picture, No. I, was taken with a small patent Dallmeyer lens, at a distance of 47 inches ; the picture, No. II, was taken with a Stein- heil A plan at ic lens, at a distance of 112 inches. The difference is striking. In No. I the figure appears slender, the chest is almost feeble, while the same model yields in No. II a full-faced, robust figure. That this slenderness does not depend on an illusion a measurement of distances will best illustrate. The distances between the eye and the point marked on the chest with a cross are exactly alike. The greatest expansion of the chest, however, including the stumps of the arms, amounts in No. I to 56 millimetres, and in No. II to 59 millimetres. Looking aside from this dissimilarity, the character of the two faces will reveal to the attentive observer other striking differences. A line, a, a, applied to the hair of the figure will run horizontal in No. II, while in No. I it inclines to the left of the figure. The pedestal, P, differs like- wise. In I, the rings are strongly inclined ellipses, while in II they are quite flat. The stump of the arm, A, A, shows hardly any surface in I, while in II it becomes quite prominent. The support of the back extends in No. II, at u, further to the right. The head is in II more between the shoulders (see the angle of the neck at U 7 ), and the whole figure seems to elevate the head more in No. I than in No. II. In II the head seems almost to incline forward, and yet the figure was immovable, the lenses were free from dis- OF THE PERSPECTIVE. 255 tortion, the direction and height was in both identical; nothing was different but the distance. Fig. 86. Besides the two pictures above described, two others were made under exactly similar circumstances at a distance of sixty and eighty inches, and when we place the four heads alongside of each other, we notice that with increasing distance the figures appear stouter and more robust, the head line inclines more and more, the ellipses of the pedestal become flatter, the chest increases in breadth, and the stumps of the arms become more prominent. T hese dif- ferences will show themselves when we take the same head with the same lens and only change the distance from the object. The author took the Apollo head with a Dallmeyer stereoscope lens at distances of five and ten feet. The latter picture is of course only half the size of the former. Differences were not visible to the naked eye on account of the smallness of the pic- tures, but they became quite evident by magnifying them, and showed the same differences as shown above in the illustrations. 256 PHOTOGRAPHIC 2ESTHETICS. We thus see how different distances yield different pictures of the same object, exactly as a different direction of the light will give a different character to a portrait of the same person. Some will say that all this is trifling, and that it does not make mnch difference whether the Apollo is a little stouter or a little more slender. So far as the Apollo is concerned this may be a matter of indifference (most people do not know how the Apollo looks at all) ; but the case is quite different in portrait photography, and where the customer’s own dear self is concerned. For their own physiognomy even inartistic people have an exceedingly keen eye. The most trifling things — a line, a wrinkle, a curl is criticized, and differences, which are not noticed in the Apollo, are easily observed in the counterfeit presentment of themselves. It is the duty of the photographer to pay attention to distance. To the photographer who only works mechanically this may be an inconvenience ; but the intelligent and ambitious artist will know how to take advantage of it. He will not make a thin person appear still thinner by taking a photograph at a short distance, nor will he increase the circumference of a stout one by placing a con- siderable distance between the camera and the model. This is particularly the case with bust pictures, but still more so with large heads, where on the one hand the distances are short, and where on the other hand the breadth of the body is almost equal to the height of the figure (so far as the same is visible in the picture). With standing figures, where the breadth is comparatively small in proportion to the length, these errors caused by distance are not so apparent. Perhaps many will wish to know which distance is the proper one, and which gives the most correct picture. This depends upon the individual, I might say, and refer to the example of the stout and slender person, which I gave above, and where entirely different distances are proper. Generally speak- ing, painters recommend, for making a drawing, a distance which is at least twice as great as the height of the object. For a person five feet high, the distance would be ten feet ; for a bust (half the length of the body), a distance of about five feet. The painter, however, has greater freedom. He can add, or leave off, or change, just as he chooses. His guide is his artistic feel- ing. I think that the photographer needs this feeling also. The opticians have furnished him with different lenses, that he may make pictures of the same object and of the same size from different OF THE PERSPECTIVE. 257 distances. A portrait photographer should be provided with lenses of different focal length.* Everything is proper when employed in the right place. And thus the question is answered : Which portrait apparatus furnishes the most correct picture, particularly when the negative has to serve for enlargement. The preceding chapter will demonstrate that even a correct drawing lens will give different pictures at different distances. I obtain a different result when 1 take a picture at five or ten feet distance. With small sized pictures, these differences are not very striking ; but when we enlarge to life size, they become very no- ticeable, and every one will observe them. Let us suppose that the original is five feet high, then it will require, according to the above academical rule, a distance of ten feet to give a proper standpoint for the contemplation of the same. But in order that the picture should make a correct impression at this distance, it is necessary that the negative be taken at the same distance, no matter with what objective, provided it draws correctly and defines sharply. If it has been taken at a shorter distance, the life-size picture will appear, under the given proposi- tions, untrue. These circumstances are modified by the nature of the object. Let us take as an object an artistically sculptured chalice. In drinking out of it or in looking at it we take it in our hands and place it at a distance of about two feet from our e} r es. We will get a true picture of such an object only by making a photograph at such a short distance, and the truth of this assertion becomes quite evident when we magnify a picture which has been taken at a greater dis- tance. The untruth of the latter becomes evident at once by com- paring the picture with the original, particularly when the width of the latter is large in comparison to its height. Cavities are different from prominences. When A B, G D (Fig. 87), is the interior of a box, we will see the side A B from P much more foreshortened than from O' or N. If, therefore, a picture is taken under like circumstances from near or far, it will appear in the former case broader in proportion to * For large heads of carte de visite size, which are now in so much demand, he should have three numbers of sufficient light (a point of great importance) at his command : 1 portrait head of about 24 lines and 4 inches focus at about 5 feet distance. 1 << a 30 “ 7 “ “ 7 “ 1 « “ 36 “ 12 “ “ 11 “ In most cases the second one will be sufficient. 17 258 THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY. the height. This relation becomes evident in taking a perspective street view. At a short distance, with a wide-angled instrument, the nearer parts will appear unusually broad. The same will happen when we suppose that A G represents the body and C D the lap or Fig. 87. the feet of a sitting person. The lap will appear much broader in proportion to the body. It would be the same if G D represented the feet of a person facing the camera. They would appear larger from N. Finally, let us imagine that C D represents the carpet or the floor of a room ; it would appear broader or with a steeper ascent from N. When we take a picture of one and the same per- son from two different standpoints, P and A, with two lenses of different focal lengths, in such a manner that the height of the body shall remain the same in both pictures, we will find in the pictures taken at a short distance that the projecting parts (hands, feet, lap, &c.) are too wide, while the receding ones, as the cheeks, are too small; the floor and chair ascend- too much (Fig. 88). For com- parison, look at the picture, Fig. 89, which has been taken from a greater distance. When we suppose that A B (Fig. 87) is the Fig- 88. Fig. 89. ground-plan of a house or a window, then it will appear broader when taken from O' than if taken from P. OF THE PERSPECTIVE. This is the reason why windows and doors appear too broad when taken at a short distance with a lens of a wide field of view, and hence look compressed, as will be noticed in many pictures taken with a pantoscope apparatus. This is also the reason why the distance of the apparatus and the size of the field of vision are of so much importance in giving a true picture of an object. How, under these circumstances, and even with a perfectly correct perspective, quite abnormal figures are produced, the an- nexed picture of balls will demonstrate. Balls will always appear round to us, or circular; but when they are located at the margin of the field of vision — i. e., when the rays intersect the plane of the picture under a very oblique angle, then the perspective figure, even when mathematic- ally correct, will be an ellipse. (See page 233.) Such a figure we will not consider a true one, as our eye has been accustomed to seeing a ball under any circumstances as a circle, and we cannot blame the painter when he ignores the rules of perspective and draws them always as circles. Unfortunately the photographer cannot do the same; he must reproduce the figure which the lens, constructed according to mathematical principles, furnishes. Distortions similar to those described on the balls will always manifest themselves with lenses of comparatively small fields of vision. The balls B and D are on the margin of a field of only about 35°. The balls A and E are at the edge of a field of 64£°. The former angle is nothing unusual with portraits, particularly with groups. The latter is frequently em- ployed in landscape and architectural photog- raphy. The marginal figures will easily appear too thick when taken at a short distance with a wide field of view. Look at the two figures (Fig. 91, Fig. 92) ; they are the marginal figures of the same bas-relief; the one taken at a distance of 3 1 feet, the other at 8| feet. The head in Fig. 92 appears twisted, thick, and the left foot turned outwards, while Fig. 91 is more correct. 260 PHOTOGRAPHIC AESTHETICS. In taking groups a long distance should be chosen, and stout persons should not be placed at the margin, but in the centre, and we should only employ a large field of vision when circumstances admit of no other. Still another point is the height of the apparatus and its direction. The normal position of the apparatus is the horizontal one. In that position the eye-point — i. e., the point where the continuation of the axis of vision would intersect the plane of the picture — would fall in a line exactly in the horizon — i. e ., in the line where, on a large sheet of water, the water and the sky appear to meet. This normal position, however, is maintained by photographers only in taking architectural views. When it is neglected, in such cases the vertical lines of the buildings will not appear vertical, but inclined — L e., converging at the top when the apparatus is turned upwards, and converging at the bottom when the apparatus is turned downwards.* Such pictures look very ugly. With portraits and simple land- * The explanation is easy. The rays proceeding from a straight line will form a plane at the point of crossing, and this will intersect the plane of the ground-glass in a straight line. When we imagine a succession of lines parallel to the ground-glass, the planes of rays proceeding from them will in- tersect the ground-glass in parallel lines according to well-known stereomet- rical laws. When, however, the ground-glass is inclined, the intersecting lines will converge. Fig. 91. Fig. 92. OF THE PERSPECTIVE. 261 scapes we very often deviate from this horizontal position. The eye-point must be looked for either in the ground or in the sky. In this case we will see in the former instance more of the ground, and in the latter more of the sky. Under some circumstances this may be an advantage. In rows of trees, where we wish to avoid an excessive foreground in order to get an insight into the splendid mass of foliage, we must direct the apparatus upwards. Bedford has done this. That the stems of the trees converged did not matter much. What influence the inclination of the appa- ratus exerts in portrait photography is shown most strikingly by taking the picture of a bust with an apparatus pointing upwards, and then from the same standpoint with the camera pointing down- wards, as the annexed figure (93) shows. In the first figure the head appears to incline forward, like that of an old man ; in the second the person stands perpendicular, like a soldier; while in the third instance the head is thrown backwards and the eyes are turned heavenward. The effect becomes still more striking with antique statues. Generally they sire calculated and executed for a high standpoint. They must be copied with a camera turned upwards, while with re- clining figures (Bndymion, Cleopatra, or Queen Louisa) the appa- ratus should be turned downwards. The elevation of the apparatus above ground is of still more im- portance. Many mistakes are made in this respect. The normal height is the height of the eyes above ground, which for a standing figure is about four and three-quarters feet. When the apparatus is placed higher,, we will see the objects from above (bird’s e} r e view) ; when we go lower, we will see the objects in what is called a frog perspective. For a sitting figure, we may assume the ob- server to be in a sitting posture — i. e., the eye or the camera at a height of about four feet. For a sitting person the apparatus is generally placed on a level with the head of the model and inclined forward, while for a standing person the height of the chest and the horizontal position is adopted. In the former case we can ele- vate the head of the model ; in the second case we can depress it to equalize errors. When the apparatus is placed too high the person will appear more in a bird’s eye perspective, and we see a larger part of the top of the head. The eyes appear depressed, the throat is covered by the chin,