,) I < ] i '1 I I 1 i i i i j i I ) ! I ] i I i \ i i .i j \ \ I I i Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/catalogueofloaneOOpatt Catalogue of Ik Loan Exhibition of Important Worlds ty George Inness Alexander lV\)ant Ralph Blakelock Held at the Chicago Galleries of Moullon & Ricl(ells March Tenth to March Twenty-Second - MCMXUI With An Apfirecialion of the Life and IVorks oj These Masters by James IVilliam Pattison Elliot! Daingerfield George W. Stevens Harriett Monroe This Bool^ Is Dedicated to those who perceive the beauty of American Art, and appreciate the genius of its maimers; who believe there is no Art in the Dwrld which better expresses the sentiment of landscape in all its moods; who perceive that the exact painting of individual objects is of less impor- tance than the massing together of larger parts; that the light which envelops all things, that the atmosphere which permeates them, and the trembling vibration which suggests life is the reality of landscape; that George Inness, A. H. Wyant and Ralph Blakelock were the men who best appreciated these great truths and the greatest exponents of them. MOUL TON and RiCKETTS Born 1825 Died 1894 George Inness, N. A. An Appreciation By Elliot! Daingerfield HE constantly growins^ interest in the work of George Inness, the wider and better understanding of the master's aims in his art, and the splendid awakening to our patriotic privilege in claiming him as our very own, seem warrant enough, if warrant were needed, for giving again and again to this public all the information and thought of him that one can assemble. We shall, ere long, acclaim him, as Holland her Rembrandt, Spain her Velasquez, or France her Corot, and with equal justice of claim. In his art there is nothing ephermeral. It is sound in its logic, based, as all great art must be, upon knowledge, and bears in its bosom the deep secret of Nature's beauty as he saw and understood it. Somewhere I have said that we shall not know the Art of Inness unless we place ourselves squarely on the platform of his religious convictions, because it was through the influence of his deeply religious nature that he could eliminate the gross, could put aside all clamor or vainglory in technique and seek the spiritual which is the intent and the success of his highest effort. Yet not for a moment must any student of his work believe there was disdain for technical achievement, or haphazard in his execution. Such an opinion would be very far from the truth. He was forever seeking to settle "principles" of treatment that he might be quite free for the higher expression, and further, one may point to certain of the earlier things and ask if in the art of any master there is more certainty of touch, more excellence of drawing, or more bravura of brush handling than these works show. That he chose to broaden it later, chose to fill great planes with simple tones, chose to find the secret of plumed elm or gnarled oak with a rul) of color, is precisely the reason we must see the master in such work. "How," asked a painter one day, "Can you make a foreground so full of detail, so suggestive of growth, of weeds and grass and all the thousand things which the rest of us have to do separately and in detail, and you achieve with what is little more than a rub of color?" "I have a method of handling my brush that is all my own," replied the old master. If then you are only interested in technique, you must look in (George Inness for a technique that is all his own. Nowhere else will you find it, and it is not of the schools. Contrast, which is drama, tone which is feeling, color which is religion — the all in all when made to express form — light which is immortality, these are to be found in the art of George Inness. Freedom! was ever man more free than he? Can we look, unmoved, with this great doctrine in our hearts, at a storm swept canvas of his? Does he not bend the trees to his will and fling vast curtains of cloud across a scene which but a moment later he makes to glow with the warmth and glory of sunshine ? A Spiritualist ? Yes, and sometimes a Spiritist, because he was always an investigator. Why else did he spend long days and destroy picture upon picture to verify for himself the theory he had adduced, that the greatness of color must be found in the middle tone? That he could not for long conform to any particular creed or method of religion was because of his impatience with restraint. Xor was he always con- sistent. \Vhat emotional artist ever is? If (leorge Inness could have set down in rule formula the thmgs he dreamed of, and did express in his painting, a miracle would have been accomplished. We should, then, to hear his message, to love his work in the right way, listen for what he has to say to us in that work, and we shall breathe the flower filled atmosphere of the Spring, we shall see the orchards in blossom, and the passing days will bring us the full leaf of green, June-green Summer, and pres- ently the thunder will roll over the hills, the clouds stoop low. and darkness steal upon the land — until indeed the master hand breaks again the empyrean blue and bathes a dripping world in sunshine. We shall go into the deep and silent places of the woods, make acquaintance with giants of the forest, and steal upon the shy heron in his haunt. More, much more has he given us, and the long note in his art as in his life is Sincerity. He pronounced anathema upon all sham or wicked effrontery, and gave intense love to the beauty of nature, whicli he interjireted and made permanent in splendid art. J \7 A Appreciation vjcorge inness^ ly./i. By james mn iam Pattison I F HAS been written that Inness became attached to Swedcnborgian faith in "later years." It was, however, at an earlier period than this indicates. Through the influence of his stepmother, he joined the Baptists very early in life, when scarcely more than a boy. But this society dropped him because of nonconformity with the strict practices, and his independent way of think- ing. Among the Baptists, of that day, there could be no exercise of inde- pendent thought. In fact, he was already, at that early time, carried away by the beauties of Swedenborg's doctrines, especially the charming theories regarding the relationships of colors. He attempted to weave these captivat- ing ideas into his pictures. One of his troubles was to realize the theories while attempting to render Nature truthfully. The Lord did not always sustain the pretty schemes of the religionists. It was in midlife, about twenty years after the opening of his audit existence, that an efl:'ort was made to give him an opportunity to fully express his many-times announced theories. A party of his friends, impressed by the artist's earnestness, pledged a sum of money amounting to $10,000, which he was to freely use, during one year, for the production of any sort of pictures to illustrate Swedcnborgian theories. Inness being thus relieved of the trammels of poverty worked with ex- altation and greater freedom. He secured three large canvasses, and designed on them mystical subjects: "The Valley of the Shadow of Death," "The New Jerusalem," and another which I never saw and know nothing of. "The Val- ley of the Shadow of Death" grew out of his own fancy, as he found no model for it in Nature. The larger part of the canvas was occupied by huge masses of gray rock and bluish purple clouds, piling up on either side of a narrow passage which penetrated the confused mass dov/n hill. Down in the depth a solitary figure, in white, was disappearing to involve itself in "The Shadow of l^eath." He frequently repeated that phrase — "Not Death, you know, but the Shadow of Death." Did he make masterpieces of these i)ictures? No. Inness was your true "Impressionist." While taking all sorts of liberties with the Nature he saw and painted so superbly, he could only express himself well when he had actually seen it. He had to have the inspiration of a true impulse, an actual impression in order to start the workings of his imagination. For these great allegories he could find no actual motive. His pathos became bathos, and the colors which he intended to be clear were killed down by overworking. It was a case of a man mistaking the nature of his genius. As we study Inness' exquisite ]iaintings. nothing is more evident than their truth to Nature. His earliest work was in a certain degree "hard." It was wonderfully true and often tender; but rarely lovable. But as we all know the hardness disappeared and very soon his pictures were enveloped in poetry as the hills are in glorious mystery, nor do any of us regret that the artist's Swedcnborgianism, however much he may have loved it, was, for the major part of his life, but little manifest. GEORGE INNESS — "Path Thru Florida Pines," Size 42 x 32.— raintcd in 1 of this sort we see Inness far aloni;- in tlie path which leads to greatness. In liis entire oiit])Ut of iiaintinjjs it is rare to tind sucli breadth of treatment, hirgeness of out- doors, and fine combinations of lines. 'Tlie picture certainly is a threat master])icce. — Loaned by the ()\vncr. i Plate II GEORGE INNESS— "Home of the Heron." Size 42 X 36. The picture is in the artist's best ])eriod ; it was painted in 1891. All the facts are ])lain!y rendered while the mystery of the woodland is delightfully maintained. Sunshine falls upon the monumental tree trunk and scat- ters itself about on many objects. This light is repeated in the sparkling autumnal foliage and upon a dignified heron, standing upon a fallen log amid a tangle of flowering weeds. — Loaned by J. G. Siiydacker, Chicago. > ) Plate III GEORGE INNESS — "Summer— Montclair," Size 42 \ 3i. — I'lic artist's home was in a coun- try with fine trees, jriving u])ri<'ht lines and luxuriant foliaestively laid-in land- scape, with a hand of clear dark tureens stretch- ing across the niid-foregroiind. ( )n a cain as of this size many objects may l)e introduced, but Wyant has ke])t it all in reserxe and in tender tints of i^rcx- and <;reen. It is a no])le exam|)le of the artist's ])oetical paintinj^. —Loaned hv W \' Kcllcy. A. H. WYANT— "The Marshes." Size 3f) x 5(). \\ yant could make a lovaI)le i)icture, of impor- tant dimensions, with loss material than almost any other painter. We have here one of his best and its quiet tones are distinctlv colorful. These long, flowinj;- lines seem restful, and the lakelet makes a fine center, under the luminous sky. The soft medley of clouds also sus^tjcst restfulness. — Loaned by Edward I-'. Swift, Chicago. A. H. W Y A N T— " Silver Birches. " Size 20 X 16. 'rii.e well drawn forms of this tangle of trunks and branches sngfjests that the canvas went outdoors with the artist and the clever use of subdued silver tints seems more accept- able than bright colors. .All these little tonal pictures, by W'vant, are high art. — Loaned by S. C. Scotten, Chicago. A. H. W Y A N T— "After the Storm." Size 10 X 14. A marshy rcacli trembles vai^nely next the foreground, and is l^ordered 1)y slight- ly rising land with trees, where figures are hinted at. y\ll these forms melt together ten- derly and keep eonii)any with the cloucly sky. Like all landsca])es hy W'yant, the eolors are subdued, though produced with a variety of pigments. — Loaned by l-'rank C. Stone. C'liica.ii;o. Plate XXX 1 11 A, H. WYANT— "Fishing." Size 8'4 x lO-M- Wyaiit painted many little pictures, experi- ments in coU)r, or worked off to relieve his feelin7 x 27 — 'i liis is one of two pic- tures almost exactly alike except that this ap- pears to he painted from nature. The colors are normal for late summer, there being no bright colors whatsoever. There is a coolness about this overshadowed spring, and the locali- ty invites to repose. — Loaned by the Owner. RALPH BLAKELOCK— "Autumn," Size 16 >^24 — In the middle of his career this artist painted many pictures of tliis minutely detailed style. They were wonderfully luminous, in- tensely sui^gestive and in no way servile imi- tations of actuality. It is (|uite possil)le to de- clare this his best period. —Loaned by .Albright Art Gallery. Buffalo. Plate LI I RALPH BLAKELOCK— "The Ghost Dance. " Size 21 X 39. — Like all this artist's presenta- tions this is a Hoatinij tui;ether of forms and colors to sui^f^cst light, space and mystery. It is a series of vil^rating sjjots ; a mystery in which we detect wild movements, but no indi- vidual personages. 'The forms in the land- scape are dancing an accouipaninieut to the fig- ures. This ])ainting properly entitled "l)a\\ n,"" but widely known as "The (Ihost Dance. " i-- one of Blakelock's most famous pictures and probably exemplifies his indi\idual vie\v])oint more than any other single canvas. — LoMiicd by ("lias. P. Piin-kanl. Chica.s»o. RALPH BLAKELOCK— "T h e Running Brook," Size 10 x 10— The artist lias iiululj^ed himself in cc)niI)iiiiii,L;- a series of dark jrreens. From otit of the mystery and confusion steals a tran(|uil ])rook and the sky ])eeps tliroiij^h the trees in a c2 — This is another l)cautiful com- bination of rich tone, heavy trees and a gleam- ing sky behind. It is a note of great richness and very exciting to the inagination. Loaned liy tlif Owner. RALPH BLAKELOCK— "Early Moon," Size 16x23 — The simple atmosj)heic permeating every part of tliis little canvas gives us a strange feeling of restfulness. There is scarce- ly anything here but luminosity and airy space at this early evening moment. All forms are blended and obscured but certain forms be- come strangely visible. There is but one thing can come to our minds, and that is the poetry going through every part of the scene. — Loaned by L. C. Eastman, Clinton, Iowa. RALPH BLAKELOCK— "Indians Camp- ing," Size 16 X 2A — Ac^ain lilakclock lias made concessions to the love of detail in pictures, but the treatment is so simple and atmos])hcric that we do not trouble ourselves aliout sim- plicities. There are few I)rilliant colors but much fine tone in the picture. The broad shin- inq- sky serves to make the tent. Iialf lost in the foliage, look inviting and restful. — Loaned Uy the Owiut. RALPH BLAKELOCK— "The Golden Hour," Size 8x 11 — \\ liat is better than a pic- ture made simply to express a tonality and a few forceful forms? if there is anything- that we may thank I'.lakelock for it is his insistence u])on simple jioetry and no interference by c(jmmon place literalisms. — Loaned 1)> d. W. Duck, New York. nil- t;il(f plraaurf in prrBPiitinn jum th lit" Ihr liiaii r.vhiliit uf uinrkr. Iiii .iIuupb. iiilakriiuli. Iirlft at our (Ehiraiju (Sallpripa' munlli uf ifflarrl!. 1913. (£lijrai|ii Ifliliiiaitlirr Woura rpapprtfullg, Hltntltun an^ iSirUptta \rui IJorlt Jlariii Coiirimi