SPECIMENS or ANTIENT SCULPTURE, ^EGYPTIAN, ETRUSCAN, GREEK, AND ROMAN: SELECTED FROM DIFFERENT COLLECTIONS IN GREAT BRITAIN, BY THE SOCIETY OF DILETTANTI. VOL. II. LONDON: PRINTED BY W. NICOL, FALL MALL, FOR PAYNE AND FOSS. 1835. mm SOCIETY OF DILETTANTI. AN. soc. cn. 178?. JAMES DAWKINS, Esq. 1799. JOHN HAWKINS, Esq. JOHN B. S. MORR1TT, Esq. The DUKE of SOMERSET. 1802. The LORD NORTHWICK. 1803. The EARL of CARLISLE. 1805. The EARL COWPER. The EARL of MORLEY. Rt. Hon. CHARLES W. WYNN. The EARL OF ABERDEEN. Sir WATKIN W. WYNN, Bart. 1807. HENRY PHILIP HOPE Esq. Sir WILLIAM CELL. The EARL of CHARLEVILLE. 1808. WILLIAM DICKINSON, Esq. 1809. FREDERICK FOSTER, Esq. WILLIAM WILKINS, Esq. 1811. WILLIAM R. HAMILTON, Esq. 1812. PEREGRINE E. TOWNELEY, Esq. 1813. WILLIAM FITZHUGH, Esq. 1814. Lt. Colonel LEAKE. The EARL of SURREY. 1815. Rt. Hon. JOHN HOOKHAM FRERE. The MARQUESS of LANSDOWNE. The EARL of CHARLEMONT. 1817. RICHARD WESTMACOTT, Esq. The LORD DUNDAS. Sir JOHN SWINBURNE, Ban. H. GALLY KNIGHT, Esq. 1818. The EARL of ROSEBERY. 1819. HENRY HALLAM, Esq. The DUKE of BEDFORD. Hon. ROBERT H. CLIVE. 1821. Hon. WILLIAM PONSONBY. 1822. WILLIAM JOHN BANKES, Esq. 1823. The MARQUESS of CHANDOS. 1826. ROBERT HENRY WOOD, Esq. Hon. GEORGE VILLIERS. The EARL of REPON. 1828. The EARL of MUNSTER. PHILIP PUSEY, Esq. 1829. Sir GEORGE STAUNTON. Bart. 1830. DA VIES GILBERT, Esq. JOHN P. DEER1NG, Esq. TERRICK HAMILTON, Esq. Sir MARTIN A. SHEE, P. R. A. 1831. The EARL of CALEDON. Hon. MOUNTSTUARTELPHINSTONE. BARTHOLOMEW FRERE, Esq. 1832. Rt. Hon. CHARLES R. VAUGHAN. The EARL of BEVERLEY. The LORD BURGHERSII. Rt. Hon. Sir ROBERT GORDON. CHARLES B. SHERIDAN, Esq The MARQUESS of NORTHAMPTON. 1833. The MARQUESS of DOUGLAS. GEORGE W. AYLMER, Esq. 1834. The DUKE of BUCCLEUCH. CAPTAIN CHARLES SOTHEBY, R. N. HENRY T. HOPE, Esq. Rt. Hon. ALEXANDER BARING. The LORD PRUDHOE. JOHN FULLER, Esq. Rt. Hon. Sir CHARLES BAGOT. The LORD HEYTESBURY. 1835. JOHN MANSFIELD, Esq. GEORGE ROBERT SMITH, Esq. MARCH 1st, MDCCCXXXV. PREFATORY REMARKS ON THE HISTORY AND PRINCIPLES OF ANTIENT SCULPTURE. 1. In the Dissertation prefixed to the first volume of the present work, Introduction, we have endeavoured to trace the rise, progress, and decline of sculpture in the nations of antiquity, as connected with the technical principles of the art recorded in their histories, and illustrated by existing specimens. The distinguished member of our Society, under whose auspices that Dissertation was drawn up, intended, in our second volume, to have embraced in his Inquiry the systematic style and principle of imitation adopted by the polished nations, and the meaning of those symbols, which were employed for embodying abstract ideas in visible representations. The treatise, which the learned author first printed for private circulation, and afterwards allowed to be communicated to the public in the pages of vol. ii. b 11 Introduction, a periodical journal, we have thought it our duty to annex to this volume in a more permanent form; and we refer to it for much that is most valuable in erudition and ingenious in conjecture. His lamented death, and the unavoidable delay of our present publication have prevented us from adopting as our own, opinions which more recent discoveries, and maturer investigation might possibly have induced him to modify or retract ; nor would we lessen the value of his suggestions by alterations which can no longer receive the sanction of his approbation. We there- fore give in our appendix the essay as he wrote it ; reserving to ourselves in this preface the task of extending our inquiry further into those peculiarities of religion and mythology, by which the arts of design were first encouraged and afterwards modified, into the causes which led to the perfection which they attained, and into the nature as well as the reality of their superiority in Greece beyond all the surrounding nations of antiquity, and beyond those of the moderns, who have deviated from their principles. Origin of 2. The writers, who have treated of the origin of sculpture, have some- sculpture. times confounded the invention of the art itself, with the introduction of some improvement more or less important in the processes subsequently adopted by different nations. The subject is necessarily attended with obscurity, but taking the word Sculpture in its widest acceptation, as including the various methods of representing in plastic materials the forms of visible objects, it is obvious that no nation has any exclusive Vol. I. p. ]|, claim to such a discovery, and that, as we have already observed in Prelim. Diss. our remarks on primitive art, it was probably known to the rudest, long before the records that we now possess were composed, and even before the knowledge of letters or civil institutions had given any perma- nence to tradition. The natural love of imitation and the delight produced by it in early life, in savages no less than in civilized communities, must have introduced the rudiments of imitative art into every country, where tractable materials were found and applied to the purposes of life. We still may see in the huts of Tartar hordes, in the islands of the Pacific, in the heart of Africa, and in the wigwains of the American Indian, such grotesque and imperfect models of human and animal forms as every nation instinctively frames for itself long before any principles of art could be supposed to influence or guide such productions. Ill 3. It is perhaps more worthy of observation, that wherever these pro- idolatry, ductions are found, they have been, almost invariably, the objects of idolatry, or at least the instruments of superstition. We do not at this moment recollect a single instance in any country, where such rude attempts have been encouraged from the mere pleasure afforded by their resemblance to the object represented. Dolls are dolls to children only; but the developed imagination of man even in his least cultivated state has always led him, through associations and analogies readily conceived, to endow his EiqqXz with mysterious and supernatural attributes. The forms of living creatures, however imperfect, were connected in the imagination with sentient beings, their deformity was not always without expression, and even their staring ugliness would give them the power of exciting terror. " Primus in orbe deos fecit timor" is emphatically true of idol worship, and the savage who talked to his puppet made of wood, clay, or feathers, would infallibly be brought by his excited fancy to connect its appearance or accidents with the fortunes of his life, or the phenomena of nature. His images, if not actually adored as Gods, have always been revered as Talismans or Obis, possessing supernatural power over present events, or supernatural prescience of the future. Thus far, we think, many nations have arrived ; there the rudest and simplest have remained ; but the further progress of the invention has been modified by the various institutions of other communities. 4. In ^Egypt, and in iEgypt only, we possess the actual monuments of Egyptian art. a finished style of art, anterior even to the oldest records of profane history; or rather perhaps the monuments themselves are records of more antient date than any which are yet known to us. Without dis- cussing the minutise of the chronological system of Mons. Cliampollion, we find from his interpretation of the hieroglyphics on the walls of the /Egyptian temples, that under the conquering dynasty of the kings, who expelled the shepherd race from that country as early as the nineteenth century before the Christian aera, the walls and tombs of Thebes were decorated with durable sculpture, as well as with paintings representing historical and personal events, equal or rather superior in design and execution to any of their later productions. 5. The more recent researches of our countrymen, and the con- temporary labours of literary foreigners, have enabled us to authenticate Egyptian art. in a great degree, as well as to appreciate the superior merit of the more antient ^Egyptian relics. Beside the statues we possess from the Memnonium, one of which is engraved in our first plate from the original in the British Museum, we lay before the reader, in the next engraving, one of the two colossal Lions of red granite brought by Lord Prudhoe from the interior of Nubia, bearing on it the name in hieroglyphic characters of Amenoph the third, the ^Ethiopian sovereign, who was called Meimion by the Greek historians. Our remarks upon these interest- ing monuments will be found in their place, but their style and execution are so important both to the corroboration of the Grecian records, as to the progress of civilization from ^Ethiopia to iEgypt, and also to the history of sculpture, as an early art, that we may be allowed to advert to the following facts gathered from Lord Prudhoe's journal. (i. On the south-east side and near the foot of Gebel Birkel, a mountain in Nubia, are the extensive remains of an antient city lying about eighty miles beyond Dongola, and above the upper cataracts of the Nile. The antient name of this town has not been ascertained, but it would appear to have been the capital of Tirhakah, who is called in the Bible king of ^Ethiopia, since some of his finest buildings are found here, and are still in good preservation. The necropolis is marked by the remains of seven- teen pyramids, and in the ruins of the city six temples are distinctly traceable. The largest of these, including the propria, chapels and sanctuaries, is about 495 feet in length and 120 feet wide. It includes in its vast circumference an older temple built by Amenoph the third, whose wall on the north-east has been faced with another outward wall built by one of his successors and inscribed with a more recent name. The great altar of beautiful grey granite was dedicated by Tirhakah. Another grey granite altar, of workmanship not much inferior, has on it the name of another sovereign ; while that of Amenoph the third remains on the grey granite rams at the entrance of the propylon, and on a pedestal within the temple, of far superior work. 7- The same name of Amenoph the third was inscribed on one of the Lions of red granite which were found at a short distance in front of another ruined temple dedicated by Anion Asro, and the other Lion was also inscribed by Anion Asro with a dedication to Amenoph the third with his own name, but the hieroglyphics on this were of a sculpture far 2d Kings, xix. 9. V inferior to the other. They might probably belong originally to the /Egyptian art. temple erected, as we have seen, by that earlier sovereign. 8. We are well aware of the obscurity which, in spite of the successful elucidation of some most ancient inscriptions, still continues to throw a shade on the meaning of early hieroglyphic writing ; but if the results from the attempts which have hitherto been made shall be admitted as at least approaching to the truth, the inferences they suggest are very important. We have now been furnished with inscriptions from various monuments deciphered by Champollion and others, which correspond in a very remarkable degree with a part of the catalogue of iEgyptian kings recorded by Manetlio, and extracted by him from sources not always deemed worthy of historical credit. These reach in general to the mo- narchs indicated by him as reigning in the seventeenth or eighteenth of the dynasties enumerated. In the most ancient documents of the Jewish and Grecian histories where we find iEgyptian and ^Ethiopian monarchs mentioned, and their actions recorded, we can now turn to corresponding traces of their existence and exploits commemorated on the durable materials of their temples, tombs, and palaces. We have certainly much reason from this coincidence, not only to infer the truth of the narratives so unexpectedly confirmed, but also the correctness of that mode of in- terpretation which has led to such satisfactory results. It is at least fair, when we have found it accurate in all that was previously known from the more recent records of the Caesars and Ptolomies, up to the most casual mention of the Pharoahs in the sacred annals of the Hebrews, to conclude that in hieroglyphic inscriptions of still higher antiquity the same exactitude prevailed, though we possess no longer the same means of estimating it. 9. We have, therefore, less hesitation in ascribing to Sesostris and his predecessor Amenoph the high antiquity which is attested by then- inscribed monuments, whether in Nubia or in iEgypt. The situation of these inscriptions coincides with all that is known from the traditions of their lives which have been handed down to us by Manetho, and by Grecian writers ; and the combats and events represented on their walls in painting and relief indicate facts corresponding with the general tenour of their supposed history. 10. Amenoph the third was one of the later monarchs of the eigh- VOL. II. C vi ./Egyptian art. teentli dynasty of Manetho ; as tlie nineteenth begins with the conquering monarch, whose exploits decorate many of the walls at Thebes, and who appears to have been the Sesostris, Sethos, or Serooses of the early Grecian writers. The buildings and monuments of princes of the eigh- teenth dynasty attest their dominion, and residence in the country above the second Cataracts of the Nile, known to the Greeks by the general name of ^Ethiopia. The sculpture of this and the subsequent period evinces a knowledge of design, and a truth of representation, not often observed by the artists of iEgypt under the government of later kings. We attribute this superiority to a probable cause, when we suppose it to have been directed by an active and powerful dynasty of warriors and conquerors to the decoration of their palaces and temples, or the cele- bration of their achievements. The more feeble character of their suc- cessors, and the more settled form of their institutions, encreased the ascendancy of the great lnerarchal aristocracy of the priesthood ; and the patronage of art seems to have been transferred from the court and the camp, to the colleges of Mgypt. The earlier monuments, whether of good or defective composition, seem to have aimed at the representation of actual nature, and to have been studied from living forms ; but those which have been transmitted to us of later date, by ^Egyptian rulers, and even after the arts of Greece were transplanted into that country with the Ptolomies, exhibit but the improvement of mechanical skill in copying forms long prescribed by custom, and consecrated in older sculptures, as the fixed and hereditary methods of pourtraying similar objects. 11. We possess then, in the sculptures of the Thebaid and of Nubia, specimens of the highest and most perfect style of imitative art, which the artists of those countries were ever able to attain. Few works of any earlier period have been authenticated, by which their gradual progress to this degree of excellence can be estimated ; and from hence their subsequent efforts appear slowly but regularly to decline in character, if not in execution. All that is clearly ascertained of ^Egyptian history, whether in art or empire, begins with the eighteenth dynasty ; which after so many successful struggles, at last fixed the fortune of their nation. The reader will find, in Cuvier's Essay on the Theory of the Earth, remarks which invalidate the conclusions drawn by Champollion from the more ancient authority of Manetho ; and the existence of contemporaneous vii governments with similar institutions at Meroe, Thebes, and Memphis, /Egyptian art. renders the long succession of dynasties at least suspicious. The catalogue was probably extended by many lists of contemporary rulers, whether of ^Ethiopia, the Thebaid, or the Delta, if not invented by the ingenuity of the priesthood, who appear to have furnished similar but inconsistent catalogues to Herodotus, and to many succeeding enquirers. The general tradition preserved by some of these historians, that the arts and religion of lower iEgypt were derived from ^Ethiopia, and that the higher region of the Nile was the cradle of their nation, is consistent with all that is extant of their monuments, and may safely be admitted. One seat of government appears to have been at Memphis, when Moses led the Hebrews out of captivity; but still in the subsequent age of Homer Thebes retained its supremacy, and furnished him with an illustration more forcible than he could probably have drawn from the city which was nearer and more accessible. 12. Whatever may be the result of further enquiry on these, and on other disputable conjectures, it is certain that at a remote and early period the religion of iEgypt had assumed the form, which it afterwards wore, when the writers of Greece first made themselves acquainted with the country ; a great and powerful hierarchy had been established, the members of which were the interpreters and ministers of a complicated mythological idolatry, as well as the guardians, rivals, or controllers of a despotic monarchy, according to the power of the prince, or the disposi- tion of the people to obey him. On the monarchs high sounding titles were already lavished ; divine honours were bestowed ; their descent was traced to the gods, the sun and moon ; and they themselves are styled gods the sons of gods. At this early period the art of writing or of representing articulate sounds by alphabetical conventional forms already existed ; and from its imperfect and complicated structure it appears to have been originally invented by this hierarchy. It seems to have consisted in employing, as a letter expressive of the sound required, the figure of some animate or inanimate object, whose name in the iEgyptian language began with a similar sound. Hence a multiplicity of signs were used for each individual letter in various inscriptions; and hence also a neat and dexterous style of sculpture was required to express clearly and intelligibly the forms of such objects as were selected for the ■Egyptian art. purpose. As these inscriptions were executed on granite, basalt, and other materials of great hardness and difficulty of execution, they must have been well acquainted with the art of fusing and tempering metals, and with the various modes of preparing materials and tools for their operations. No monuments or records of ruder dr more imperfect times in /Egvpt have yet been discovered, though from this period the art remained stationary, or rather seems to have become more and more mechanical, and less dependent on characteristic imitation. But though we are unable, from the extreme obscurity and imperfection of our his- torical materials, to trace the steps by which jEgypt attained its early civilisation, the analogy of its progress in eveiy known community would still lead us to infer, that the unhewn pillar was older than the obelisk, and that gods of clay, of palm trees, or wild fig trees, were known and worshipped before stones could be subjected to the chisel. Worship of 13. The worship of the creator and disposer of all things was, as we nom""a. Th!C ' learn from the authentic records of Scripture, revealed to man in the earliest stage of his existence. That of the hidden power or powers which preside over the great phenomena of nature is so natural to him in social life, and the worship of the phamomena themselves so obvious to the untutored feeling of the savage, that some religion has probably been found wherever man was settled. The earliest, most natural, and consequently most general defection from the purer worship of the first ages of the world, was into that which has since been called the purer Sabasism, the adoration of the heavenly bodies and the elements of nature. These afforded no temptations to idolatry, and were probably worshipped directly, and not under the forms of substituted representatives, or at least under such only as were analogous to their prototypes in their effects and terrestrial operations. The earliest records of almost every nation, and the earliest names of their divinities, proclaim this worship to have been nearly universal, with the exception of that race to which the primeval religion was preserved by a series of divine revelations. The sun and moon were accordingly reverenced, as the beneficent causes of life and happiness ; and the thunder, as the author of destruction, in every country ; and the titles of the Baalim and Ashtaroth, of Phre and Isis, of the oldest gods of Greece, of Syria, India and yEgypt alike bear witness to the prevalence of this superstition, no less than those of Mithras and Arimanes. IX But, as we have already observed, a new source of superstitious venera- Worship of * Natural Ph. tiou was opened to the imagination of man as soon as his own ingenuity nomena. had enabled him to imitate the forms of living agents. That these imita- tions have been the objects of worship in almost every country, whether barbarous or civilised, is a remarkable fact ; and we think also that it is scarcely less remarkable, that they were almost invariably identified with objects so dissimilar in their appearance, as those of the purer and more obvious, if not more rational, worship of the elementary bodies. 14. Wherever indeed the progress of elementary religion, and the civil Symbolic Attributes. constitution of the country, had separated from the rest of the community a caste of Brahmins or a sacred college of priests exclusively charged with the service of the national deities, they would soon apply to their own purposes these new and powerful incentives of emotion. The casual forms given by the potter to his charmed clay, or resulting- from the clumsy effort of the carver to imitate men and animals in wood, were probably identified by the priesthood, through some forced or fanciful analogy, with the beings already worshipped. Gods would then be classed, monsters symbolically explained, terrible and perhaps sensual attributes would be added, the people terrified, and the art established. We think it still possible to recognise much of this process in the early and long continued fo nils of sacred sculpture which prevailed in iEgypt, China and Hindos- tan, as well as in the less permanent monsters, which were similarly worshipped in Greece, Asia or Etruria. The general resemblance of these pristine efforts of art may be perhaps more naturally accounted for by the common principle of them all, than by any very authentic record of early mutual communications; and there are certainly" observable differences in the style of each, which would lead us to infer their original independence of each other. We know little of the state of art in Assyria or Babylonia, the great depositories of primitive civilisation in Asia ; but from the records we possess of the Jewish and Greek historians, we have ■ The elongated limbs and attenuated forms on many Egyptian monuments, and some of the early Greek and Italian vases, may be contrasted with the figures of Elephanta and Ellora, with the coloured metopes of Selinus, and the fictile vases of the real Etrurians, ft is singular how nearly the rudeness and imperfection of these early Etruscan works resemble that of the degenerate Roman sculpture in the lower empire , were it not for the inscriptions which occasionally occur they would be classed with the barbarisms executed under the. successors of Constantine. (See some of those which have been brought from Volterra.) vol. n. ( \ X Symbolic Attributes. Worship of Images. no reason to suppose that Bel or Dagon were less hideous than their contemporary deities of .iEgypt and iEthiopia. That such images retained their influence, and were adored by communities of civilised men ; and that they still continue to retain it in many parts of the world, present a phenomenon in the history of the human mind as strange and extraordi- nary as it was then familiar, and all but universal ; for these nations, at an early period, in fact included all that could pretend to any degree of refinement. In consequence of their institutions they each arrived at a regulated system of superstition : they symbolised in monstrous repre- sentations the supposed attributes of their gods ; they improved the mechanical means of representing them ; and they introduced new or more costly materials for the purpose : but where hereditary or hierarchal institutions were established, they soon consecrated particular forms and modes of treatment, which became too sacred for innovation, and con- sequently for improvement. Invention in such subjects was soon limited to increased dexterity in mere mechanical execution ; or not being en- couraged to vary the established design of their figures, it was only directed to enhance their terrors, or to introduce new symbols expressive of the dreams of religious and sacerdotal metaphysicians. From such sources however the art derived its earliest encouragement, and from such insti- tutions no nearer approach to the resemblance of actual nature could be expected. 15. As we have already observed, the worship of images began pro- bably in the vague terror of a rude people at their hideous resemblance to humanity; but in countries where a certain progress had been made, and in which a priesthood had been consecrated to the elementary religion, their influence was soon directed in aid of the primeval adoration. Man made his gods after himself ; and the likeness was adopted by the priests in the progress to a more visible and lucrative superstition. Astronomy became fraught with signs and wonders ; and the priests were not less ingenious in applying symbolically the casual figures of sculpture to the ed deities of their country, than antiquaries and philosophers have been found, in reconciling to their own preconceived ideas the fortuitous system of ancient mythology. The sun migrated through a hundred human forms in various countries ; was adored as the bull Apis, as a lion, a cock, a ram, a wolf, and in half the monsters of the zodiac ; recogms since xi the moon and stars and lightning made a similar masquerade ; hut Worship of j i -i i i Images. conjecture and philosophy nave not always been very successful, though often very positive, in deciding on the causes why these particular forms were preferable to others. We cannot but suspect that many of them were casually adopted, explained, symbolised, and gradually systematised by the priests, who, especially in Mgypt, formed a community apart powerfully influencing the rest of the society. Once adopted and recog- nised, such forms acquired a meaning, and became permanent wherever there were similar institutions. Still we can everywhere trace in the names of their deities the worship of the heavenly bodies, and in their forms the prevalence of idolatry. In part of Syria, in Palestine at least, it was superseded at an early period by the purer doctrine of the revealed religion ; and the divine prohibition of the Jewish laws, established by their conquests, left the idols of Canaan in the obscurity to which it reduced their adorers. The earlier and simple worship of Sabaiism had also still maintained itself in some of the hardier and more warlike tribes, who continued to worship the sun and moon, and fire, as their terrestrial emblems. Among these arose the Magian ritual, and the religion promulgated by Zoroaster. Before them, under the conquering army of Cyrus and the Persians, " Bel bowed down, and Nebo stooped," the altars and images of Chaldam and of central Asia were overthrown, and sculpture became extinct ; for in these countries its representations were an abomination. Such, in the civilised nations of antiquity, was the fate of art, before the peculiar circumstances and character of the Pelasgic and Hellenic tribes had given it an impulse, till then unknown, and a perfection, which it has been the object of subsequent societies to imitate. 16. A religion derived from such an origin, and professed by tribes The Sim and and nations independent of each other, and under very different circum- M ° 0 "' stances, would naturally diverge into a variety of forms ; and this we know took place. The great visible and beneficent agents of nature, the sun, " that looks from his dominion like the god of this new world" — the moon, " rising in clouded majesty, apparent queen of heaven," with her starry host, became the primary objects of adoration to the nomadic or agricultural tribes in mild and genial climates. Of this system the sun was naturally the supreme, and was adored under a thousand names in xii The Sim and many districts of Asia and the south. The Bacchus of one local ritual was the Bel us of another, and the Adonis or Thammuz of a third, and was endowed with attributes analogous to the effects he was known or supposed to produce. Those most generally assigned to him, as well as to the moon, the bow and arrows were suggested by the solar and lunar rainbows, which sometimes accompany their course. The Phoenician Hercules, the Delphic Apollo, and many other personifications of the same deity have these weapons assigned to them. But a god superior to other deities, when men became civilised, and the human mind enlarged, was also esteemed the father and first cause of all the subordinate divi- nities ; and from being originally the ruler of the sun became invested with supposed omnipotence more or less rudely conceived, and presenting a train of different imaginary associations. Personification 17- Less favoured nations and ruder tribes in the recesses of the o un er. mountam anf | t ] ie gl 00m 0 f primeval forests learned naturally to fear, and tried to propitiate the more destructive agents of nature. The thunderbolt has seldom fallen on the hut of the savage, or riven the trees around it without suggesting to his imagination the imagery, though not the noble expression, which occurred to the poet of Augustus : — Ipse Pater, medid nimborum in nocte, corusc& Fulmina molitur dextr& To him his vows wei'e paid — Mortalia cord a Per gentes humilia stravit pavor anil thus the god, whose darkness overshadowed the sun itself, the cloud- compelling Jove, the thunderer of heaven, was enthroned on Lycieus, Gargarus, the Cretan Ida, the Thessalian Olympus, and on other less celebrated mountains, with many legendary names and local rites of various observance but homogeneous origin. In Greece his supremacy was the theme of their earliest poetry ; but with the Greeks Hyperion and Phuebe and their Titanian brethren, the beneficent rulers of a golden age, acknowledged as older though less powerful deities, had been banished from their worship by his superior might. We see in the fol- lowing words of the chorus of antient Argives in the Agamemnon of iEschylus (v. 162, Ed. Wellauer) how much the sentiment of successive dethronements of the supreme deity until the establishment of the reign of J.upiter, was a part of the religious creed of the antients. xx[tya%ta Sqctffu ftmav, ouSsv olv ztiiv av. Of 8 ZXUT E$U, TOIOL- xn^oc oiyjmi TV%pti. Zwx 8: tk s^p^ovaQ mpma xXotZav, TmhlOLl fy£VG>l> TO XXi>. Jupiter consequently became father of gods and men; and in that capa- city shared in the common attributes of other supreme deities as his votaries acquired faith in such metaphysical abstractions. 18. The confusion thus made between the primary attributes of the personified Tliunder, and those which belong to Jupiter as the Supreme God, with other and similar confusions, gave rise to the popular and poetical mythology of the Iliad; and the same causes produced like effects through all the regions of polytheism. The dominant tribes of Pelasgi and Hellenes were worshippers of Jupiter, and probably of that Jupiter whose throne was on Olympus, and his most antient worship at Dodona. The gods of other tribes, though essentially as great, yet with various names were admitted only in subordination to his power, and honoured as local or as limitary deities, as his children, or as assessors of his throne, or in the departments of ocean, earth, or air. Thus the Bacchus, Apollo and Hercules of Greece were yet in more eastern climates themselves supreme ; as the sun with whom they were identical ; and the mighty mother adored in Phrygia, as well as Astarte queen of heaven, shrunk into the Ceres and Diana or Venus of the poets and mythologists. The rank they thus lost in the popular religion was yet locally retained in the mysteries, which seem to have originated in these proscribed superstitions. The early civilization and system of iEgypt was available to give plausibility and consistence to these for the most part foreign rituals, and to account by ingenious abstractions for whatever was in its literal and direct application contradictory or unintelligible. The mysteries seem to have been founded on the original worship of the sun, moon, and earth, the beneficent and productive powers of nature, and gradually to have been directed to the higher and invisible source of these great effects. The popular religion proceeded as it began, enrolling new deities from every local tribe that acceded to the federal worship of Personification of Thunder. r