Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/expressionofemotOOdarw_0 THE EXPRESSION OF THE EMOTIONS IN MAN AND ANIMALS. By CHAKLES DABWIN, M.A., F.K.S., &o. WITH PHOTOGRAPHIC AND OTHER ILLUSTRATIONS. m DZZ NEW TOEK: D. APPLETON AND COMPANY, 649 & 651 BROADWAY. 1873. THE GETTY CENTER LIBRARY CONTENTS. Introduction .. Pages 1-26 CHAP. I. — General Principles of Expression. The three chief principles stated — The first principle — Serviceable actions become habitual in association with certain states of the mind, and are performed whether or not of service in each par- ticular case — The force of habit — Inheritance — Associated habitual movements in man — Reflex actions — Passage of habits into reflex actions — Associated habitual movements in the lower animals — Concluding remarks 27-49 CHAP. II. — General Principles of Expression — continued. The Principle of Antithesis — Instances in the dog and cat — Origin of the principle — Conventional signs — The principle of anti- thesis has not arisen from opposite actions being consciously performed under opposite impulses 50-65 CHAP. III. — General Principles of Expression — concluded. The principle of the direct action of the excited nervous system on the body, independently of the will and in part of habit — Change of colour in the hair — Trembling of the muscles — Modified secretions — Perspiration — Expression of extreme pain — Of rage, great joy, and terror — Contrast between the emotions which cause and do not cause expressive movements — Exciting and depressing states of the mind — Summary .. .. 66-82 CHAP. IV. — Means of Expression in Animals. The emission of sounds — Vocal sounds — Sounds otherwise pro- duced — Erection of the dermal appendages, hairs, feathers, &c, under the emotions of anger and terror — The drawing back ot the ears as a preparation for fighting, and as an expression of anger — Erection of the ears and raising the head, a sign ot attention 83-115 iv CONTENTS. CHAP. V. — Special Expressions of Animals. The Dog, various expressive- movements of — Cats — Horses — Ruminants — Monkeys, their expression of joy and affection — Of pain — Anger — Astonishment and Terror .. Pages 116-146 CHAP. VI. — Special Expressions of Man : Suffering and Weeping. The screaming and weeping of infants — Form of features — Age at which weeping commences — The effects of habitual restraint on weeping — Sobbing — Cause of the contraction of the muscles round the eyes during screaming — Cause of the secretion of tears 147-177 CHAP. VII. — Low Spirits, Anxiety, Grief, . Dejection, Despair. General effect of grief on the system — Obliquity of the eye- brows under suffering — On the cause of the obliquity of - the eyebrows — On the depression of the corners of the mouth 178-197 CHAP. VIII. — Joy, High Spirits, Love, Tender Feelings, Devotion. Laughter primarily the expression of joy — Ludicrous ideas — Movements of the features during laughter — Nature of the sound produced — The secretion of tears during loud laughter — Gradation from loud laughter to gentle smiling — High spirits — The expression of love — Tender feelings — De- votion 198-221 CHAP. IX. — Eeflection— Meditation — Ill-temper — Sulkiness — Determination. The act of frowning — Reflection with an effort or with the per- ception of something difficult or disagreeable — Abstracted medi- tation — Ill-temper — Moroseness — Obstinacy — Sulkiness and pouting — Decision or determination — The firm closure of the mouth .. .. 222-238 CONTENTS. CHAP. X. — Hatred and Anger. Hatred — Rage, effects of on the system — Uncovering of the teeth — Rage in the insane — Anger and indignation — As expressed by the various races of man — Sneering and defiance — 'The uncovering of the canine tooth on one side of the face .. Pages 239-253 CHAP. XI. — Disdain — Contempt — Disgust — Guilt — Pride, etc. — Helplessness — Patience — Affirmation and Negation. Contempt, scorn and disdain, variously expressed — Derisive smile — Gestures expressive of contempt — Disgust — Guilt, deceit, pride, &c. — Helplessness or impotence — Patience — Obstinacy — Shrugging the shoulders common to most of the races of man — Signs of affirmation and negation 254-277 CHAP. XII. — Surprise — Astonishment — Fear — Horror. Surprise, astonishment — Elevation of the eyebrows — Opening the mouth — Protrusion of the lips — Gestures accompanying surprise — Admiration — Fear — Terror — Erection of the hair — Contrac- tion of the platysma muscle — Dilatation of the pupils — Horror —Conclusion v 278-309 CHAP. XIII. — Self-attention — Shame — Shyness — Modesty: Blushing. Nature of a blush — Inheritance — The parts of the body most affected — Blushing in the various races of man — Accompanying gestures — Confusion of mind — Causes of blushing — Self- attention, the fundamental element — Shyness — Shame, from broken moral laws and conventional rules — Modesty — Theory of blushing — Recapitulation .. 310-347 CHAP. XIV. — Concluding Remarks and Summary. The three leading principles which have determined the chief move- ments of expression — Their inheritance — On the part which the will and intention have played in the acquirement of various expressions — The instinctive recognition of expression — The bearing of our subject on the specific unity of the races of man — On the successive acquirement of various expressions by the progenitors of man — The importance of expression — Conclusion 348-307 i LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Fig. Page. 1. Diagram of the muscles of the face, from Sir C. Bell .. .. 24 2. „ „ „ Henle .. 24 3« 5) 55 5) )> 25 4. Small dog watching a cat on a table 43 5. Dog approaching another dog with hostile intentions . . . . 52 6. Dog in a humble and affectionate frame of mind 53 7. Half-bred Shepherd Dog 54 8. Dog caressing his master 55 9. Cat. savage, and prepared to fight 58 10. Cat in an affectionate frame of mind 59 11. Sound-producing quills from the tail of the Porcupine .. .. 93 12. Hen driving away a dog from her chickens 98 13. Swan driving away an intruder 99 14. Head of snarling dog 118 15. Cat terrified at a dog 128 16. Cynopithecus niger, in a placid condition 136 17. The same, when pleased by being caressed 136 18. Chimpanzee disappointed and sulky 141 19. Photograph of an insane woman 296 20. Terror 299 21. Horror and Agony 306 Plate L to face page 148. Plate V. to face page 255. ,, IL ,, 180. ,, VI. „ 264. ,, III. 202. ,, VII. ,, 300. ,, IV. ,, 250. N.B. — Several of the figures in these seven Heliotype Plates have been reproduced from photographs, instead of from the original negatives; and they are in consequence somewhat indistinct. Nevertheless they are faithful copies, and are much superior for my purpose to any drawing, however carefully executed. ON THE EXPKESSION OF THE EMOTIONS IN MAN AND ANIMALS. INTEODUCTIOJST. Many works have been written on Expression, but a greater number on Physiognomy, — that is, on the recognition of character through the study of the per- manent form of the features. With this latter subject I am not here concerned. The older treatises, 1 which I have consulted, have been of little or no service to me. The famous ' Conferences ' 2 of the painter Le Brun, published in 1667, is the best known ancient work, and contains some good remarks. Another some- what old essay, namely, the 'Discours,' delivered 1774-1782, by the well-known Dutch anatomist Cam- per, 3 can hardly be considered as having made any marked advance in the subject. The following works, on the contrary, deserve the fullest consideration. 1 J. Parsons, in his paper in the Appendix to the 1 Philosophical Transactions ' for 1746, p. 41, gives a list of forty-one old authors who have written on Expression. 2 ' Conferences sur l'exprcssion des differents Caracteres des Passions/ Paris, 4to, 1667. I always quote from the republication of the • Con- ferences ' in the edition of Lavater, by Moreau, which appeared in 1820, as given in vol. ix. p. 257. 3 'Discours par Pierre Camper sur le moyen de representer les diverses passions,' &c. 1792. 2 INTRODUCTION. Sir Charles Bell, so illustrious for his discoveries in physiology, published in 1806 the first edition, and in 1844 the third edition of his ' Anatomy and Philosophy of Expression.' \ He may with justice be said, not only to have laid the foundations of the subject as a branch of science, but to have built up a noble struc- ture. His work is in every way deeply interesting; it includes graphic descriptions of the various emotions, and is admirably illustrated. It is generally admitted that his service consists chiefly in having shown the intimate relation which exists between the movements of expres- sion and those of respiration. One of the most im- portant points, small as it may at first appear, is that the muscles round the eyes are involuntarily' • contracted during violent expiratory efforts, in order to protect these delicate organs from the pressure of the blood. This fact, which has been fully investigated for me with the greatest kindness by Professor Honders of Utrecht, throws, as we shall hereafter see, a flood of light on several of the most important expressions of the human countenance. The merits of Sir C. Bell's work have been undervalued or quite ignored by several foreign writers, but have been fully admitted by some, for instance by M. Lemoine, 5 who with great justice says : — " Le livre de Ch. Bell devrait etre medite par " quiconque essaye de faire parler le visage de l'homme, " par les philosophes aussi bien que par les artistes, " car, sous une apparence plus legere et sous le pretexte " de l'esthetique, c'est un des plus beaux monu- 4 I always quote from the third edition, 1844, which was published after the death of Sir C. Bell, and contains his latest corrections. The first edition of 1806 is much interior in merit, and does not include some of his more important views. 5 ' De la Physionomie et de la Parole/ par Albert Lemoine, 1865, p. 101. INTRODUCTION. 3 " merits de la science des rapports du physique et du " moral." From reasons which will presently be assigned, Sir C. Bell did not attempt to follow out his views as far as they might have been carried. He does not try to explain why different muscles are brought into action under different emotions ; why, for instance, the inner ends of the eyebrows are raised, and the corners of the mouth depressed, by a person suffering from grief or anxiety. In 1807 M. Moreau edited an edition of Lavater on Physiognomy, 6 in which he incorporated several of his own essays, containing excellent descriptions of the movements of the facial muscles, together with many valuable remarks. He throws, however, very little light on the philosophy of the subject. For in- stance, M. Moreau, in speaking of the act of frowning, that is, of the contraction of the muscle called by 6 ' L'Art de connaitre les Hommes,' &c, par G. Lavater. The earliest edition of this work, referred to in the preface to the edition of 1820 in ten volumes, as containing the observations of M. Moreau. is said to have been published in 1807 ; and I have no doubt that this is cor- rect, because the ' Notice sur Lavater ' at the commencement of volume i. is dated April 13, 1806. In some bibliographical works, however, the date of 1805-1809 is given ; but it seems impossible that 1805 can be correct. Dr. Duchenne remarks (' Mecanisme de la Physionomie Humaine,' 8vo edit. 1862, p. 5, and 'Archives Generales de Me'decine,' Jan. et Fe'v. 1862) that M. Moreau " a compost pour son ouvrage un article important," &c, in the year 1805 ; and I find in volume i. of the edition of 1820 passages bearing the dates of December 12, 1805, and another January 5, 1806, besides that of April 13, 1806, above referred to. In consequence of some of these passages having thus been com- posed in 1805, Dr. Duchenne assigns to M. Moreau the priority over Sir C. Bell, whose work, as we have seen, was published in 1806. This is a very unusual manner of determining the priority of scientific- works; but such questions are of extremely little importance in com- parison with their relative merits. The passages above quoted from M. Moreau aid from Le Brun are taken in this and all other cases from the edition of 1820 of Lavater, torn. iv. p. 228, and torn. ix. p. 279. 4 INTRODUCTION. French writers the sour oilier (corrugator supercilii), remarks with truth : — " Cette action des sourciliers est " un des symptomes les plus tranches de Pexpression " des affections penibles ou concentrees." He then adds that these muscles, from their attachment and position, ar,e fitted " a resserrer, a concentrer les princi- rt paux traits de la face, comme ilconvient dans toutes " ces passions vraiment oppressives ou profondes, dans " ces affections dont le sentiment semble porter l'orga- " nisation a revenir sur elle-meme, a se contracter et " a samoindrir, comme pour offrir moins de prise et de " surface a des impressions redoutables ou importunes.' , He who thinks that remarks of this kind throw any- light on the meaning or origin of the different expres- sions, takes a very different view of the subject to what I do. In the above passage there is but a slight, if any, advance in the philosophy of the subject, beyond that reached by the painter Le Brun, who, in 1667, in de- scribing the expression of fright, says: — "Le sourcil " qui est abaisse d'un cote et eleve de l'autre, fait voir " que la partie elevee semble le vouloir joindre au " cerveau pour le garantir du mal que l'ame apercoit, " et le cote qui est abaisse et qui parait enfle, nous fait " trouver dans cet etat par les esprits qui viennent du " cerveau en abondance, comme pour couvrir l'ame et u la defendre du mal quelle craint ; la bouche fort g< ouverte fait voir le saisissement du coeur, par le * sang qui se retire vers lui, ce qui l'oblige, voulant " respirer, a faire un effort qui est cause que la bouche " s'ouvre extremement, et qui, lorsqu'il passe par les * organes de la voix, forme un son qui n'est point " articule ; que si les muscles et les veines paraissent " enfles, ce n'est que par les esprits que ^e cerveau " envoie en ces parties-la." I have thought the fore- INTRODUCTION. 5 going sentences worth quoting, as specimens of the surprising nonsense which has been written on the subject. * The Physiology or Mechanism of Blushing/ by Dr. Burgess, appeared in 1839, and to this work I shall frequently refer in my thirteenth Chapter. In 1862 Dr. Duchenne published two editions, in folio and octavo, of his ' Mecanisme de la Physionomie 'Hurnaine,' in which he analyses by means of elec- tricity, and illustrates by magnificent photographs, the movements of the facial muscles. He has generously permitted me to copy as many of his photographs as I desired. His works have been spoken lightly of, or quite passed over, by some of his countrymen. It is possible that Dr. Duchenne may have exaggerated the importance of the contraction of single muscles in giving expression ; for, owing to the intimate manner in which the muscles are connected, as may be seen in Henle's anatomical drawings 7 — the best I believe ever published — it is difficult to believe in their separate action. Nevertheless, it is manifest that Dr. Duchenne clearly apprehended this and other sources of error, and as it is known that he was eminently successful in elucidating the physio- logy of the muscles of the hand by the aid of electricity, it is probable that he is generally in the right about the muscles of the face. Jn my opinion, Dr. Duchenne has greatly advanced the subject by his treatment of it. No one has more carefully studied the contraction of each separate muscle, and the conse- quent furrows produced on the skin. He has also, and this is a very important service, shown which muscles 7 ' Handbuch der Systematischen Anatomie des Menschen.' Band I. Dritte Abtkeiluug, 1858. 6 INTRODUCTION. are least under the separate control of the will. He enters very little into theoretical considerations, and seldom attempts to explain why certain muscles and not others contract under the influence of certain emotions. A distinguished French anatomist, Pierre Gratiolet, gave a course of lectures on Expression at the Sorbonne, and his notes were published (1865) after his death, under the title of * De la Physionomie et des Mouve- ments d'Expression.' This is a very interesting work, full of valuable observations. His theory is rather complex, and, as far as it can be given in a single sen- tence (p. 65), is as follows : — " II resulte, de tous les " faits. que j'ai rappeles, que les sens, l'imagination et " la pensee elle-meme, si elevee, si abstraite -qu'on la " suppose, ne peuvent s'exercer sans eveiller un senti- " ment correlatif, et que ce sentiment se traduit " directement, sympathiquemenf, symboliquement ou " metaphoriquement, dans toutes les spheres des or- " ganes exterieurs, qui le racontent tous, suivant leur " mode d'action propre, comme si chacun d'eux avait " ete directement affecte." Gratiolet appears to overlook inherited habit, and even to some extent habit in the individual ; and therefore he fails, as it seems to me, to give the right explanation, or any explanation at all, of many ges- tures and expressions. As an illustration of what he calls symbolic movements, I will quote his remarks (p. 37), taken from M. Chevreul, on a man playing at billiards. " Si une bille devie legerement de la direc- " tion que le joueur pretend lui imprimer, ne l'avez-vous " pas vu cent fois la pousser du regard, de la tete et " meme des epaules, comme si ces mouvements, pure- " ment symboliques, pouvaient rectifier son trajet ? Des " mouvements non moins significatifs se produisent INTRODUCTION. 7 " quand la bille manque d'une impulsion suffisante. Et, " chez les joueurs novices, ils sont quelquefois accuses " au point d'eveiller le sourire sur les levres des speo " tateurs." Such movements, as it appears to me, may be attributed simply to habit. As often as a man has wished to move an object to one side, he has always pushed it to that side ; when forwards, he has pushed it forwards ; and if he has wished to arrest it, he has pulled backwards. Therefore, when a man sees his ball travelling in a wrong direction, and he intensely wishes it to go in another direction, he cannot avoid, from long habit, unconsciously performing movements which in other cases he has found effectual. As an instance of sympathetic movements Gratiolet gives (p. 212) the following case : — " un jeune chien a " oreilles droites, auquel son maitre presente de loin " quel que viande appetissante, fixe avec ardeur ses " yeux sur cet objet dont il suit tous les mouvements, " et pendant que les yeux regardent, les deux oreilles " se portent en avant comme si cet objet pouvait etre " entendu." Here, instead of speaking of sympathy between the ears and eyes, it appears to me more sfmpJe to believe, that as dogs during many gene- rations have, whilst intently looking at any object, pricked their ears in order to perceive any sound; and conversely have looked intently in the direction of a sound to which they may have listened, the movements of these organs have become firmly asso- ciated together through long-continued habit. Dr. Piderit published in 1859 an essay on Expression, which I have not seen, but in which, as he states, he forestalled Gratiolet in many of his views. In 1807 he published his ' Wissenschaftliches System derMimik und Physiognomik.' It is hardly possible to give in a few sentences a fair notion of his views; perhaps the 8 INTRODUCTION. two following sentences will tell as much as can be briefly told : " the muscular movements of expression " are in part related to imaginary objects, and in part " to imaginary sensorial impressions. In this propo- " sition lies the key to the comprehension of all " expressive muscular movements." (s. 25.) Again, " Expressive movements manifest themselves chiefly " in the numerous and mobile muscles of the face, i( partly because the nerves by which they are set into " motion originate in the most immediate vicinity of " the mind-organ, but partly also because these muscles " serve to support the organs of sense." (s. 26.) If Dr. Piderit had studied Sir C. Bell's work, he would pro- bably not have said (s. 101) that violent laughter causes a frown from partaking of the nature of pain ; or that with infants (s. 103) the tears irritate the eyes, and thus excite the contraction of the surrounding muscles. Many good remarks are scattered throughout this volume, to which I shall hereafter refer. Short discussions on Expression may be found in various works, which need not here be particularised. Mr. Bain, however, in two of his works has treated the subject at some length. He says, 8 " I look upon the " expression so-called as part and parcel of the feel- " ing. I believe it to be a general law of the mind that, w along with the fact of inward feeling or conscious- " ness, there is a diffusive action or excitement over " the bodily members." In another place he adds, " A " very considerable number of the facts may be brought "under the following principle: namely, that states of " pleasure are connected with an increase, and states * of pain with an abatement, of some, or all, of the I 4 The Senses and the Intellect,' 2nd edit. 1864, pp. 96 and 288. The preface to the first edition of this work is dated June, 1855. See also the 2nd edition of Mr. Bain's work on the ' Emolions and Will.' INTKODUCTION. 9 •< vital functions." But the above law of the diffusive action of feelings seems too general to throw much light on special expressions. Mr. Herbert Spencer, in treating of the Feelings in his 'Principles of Psychology ' (1855), makes the fol- lowing remarks : — tc Fear, when strong, expresses itself " in cries, in efforts to hide or escape, in palpitations " and tremblings ; and these are just the manifestations " that would accompany an actual experience of the " evil feared. The destructive passions are shown in a " general tension of the muscular system, in gnashing of " the teeth and protrusion of the claws, in dilated eyes " and nostrils, in growls ; and these are weaker forms of " the actions that accompany the killing of prey." Here we have, as I believe, the true theory of a large number of expressions ; but the chief interest and difficulty of the subject lies in following out the wonderfully complex results. I infer that some one (but who he is I have not been able to ascertain) formerly advanced a nearly similar view, for Sir 0. Bell says, 9 " It has been maintained that what are called the ex- " ternal signs of passion, are only the concomitants of " those voluntary movements which the structure ren- " ders necessary." Mr. Spencer has also published 10 a valuable essay on the physiology of Laughter, in which he insists on " the general law that feeling " passing a certain pitch, habitually vents itself in " bodily action ;" and that " an overflow of nerve-force '* undirected by any motive, will manifestly take first " the most habitual routes ; and if these do not suffice, * will next overflow into the less habitual ones." This 8 ' The Anatomy of Expression,' 3rd edit. p. 121. 10 « Essays, Scientific, Political, and Speculative,' Second Series, 1863, p. 111. There is a discussion on Laughter in the First Series of Essays, which discussion seems to me of very inferior value. 10 INTRODUCTION. law I believe to be of the highest importance in throw- ing light on our subject. 11 All the authors who have written on Expression, with the exception of Mr. Spencer — the great expoun- der of the principle of Evolution — appear to have been firmly convinced that species, man of course included, came into existence in their present condition. Sir C. Bell, being thus convinced, maintains that many of our facial muscles are " purely instrumental in ex- " pression;" or are "a special provision " for this sole object. 12 But the simple fact that the anthropoid apes possess the same facial muscles as we do, 13 renders it very improbable that these muscles in our case serve exclusively for expression ; for no one, I presume, would be inclined to admit that monkeys have been endowed with special muscles solely for exhibiting their hideous grimaces. Distinct uses, inde- pendently of expression, can indeed be assigned with much probability for almost all the facial muscles. Sir C. Bell evidently wished to draw as broad a distinction as possible between man and the lower animals ; and he consequently asserts that with " the 11 Since the publication of the essay just referred to, Mr. Spencer has written another, on " Morals and Moral Sentiments," in the ' Fort- nightly Review,' April 1, 1871, p. 426. He has, also, now published his final conclusions in vol. ii. of the second edit, of the 1 Principles of Psychology,' 1872, p. 539. I may state, in order that I may not be accused of trespassing on Mr. Spencer's domain, that I announced in my 'Descent of Man,' that I had then written a part of. the present volume : my first MS. notes on the subject of expression bear the date of the year 1838. 12 'Anatomy of Expression,' 3rd edit. pp. 98, 121, 131. 13 Professor Owen expressly fctates (Proc. Zoolog. Soc. 1830, p. 28) that this is the case with respect to the Orang, and specifies all the more important muscles which are well known to serve with man for the expression of his feelings. See, also, a description of several • of the facial muscles in the Chimpanzee, by Prof. Macalister, in ' Annals an 1 Magazine of Natural History,' vol. vii. May, 1871, p. 342. INTRODUCTION. 11 " lower creatures there is no expression but what may " be referred, more or less plainly, to their acts of " volition or necessary instincts." He further maintains that their faces " seem chiefly capable of expressing " rage and fear." 14 But man himself cannot express love and humility by external signs, so plainly as does a dog, when with drooping ears, hanging lips, flexuous body, and wagging tail, he meets his beloved master. Nor can these movements in the dog be explained by acts of volition or necessary instincts, any more than the beaming eyes and smiling cheeks of a man when he meets an old friend. If Sir C. Bell had been questioned about the expression of affection in the dog, he would no doubt have answered that this animal had been created with special instincts, adapt- ing him for association with man, and that all further enquiry on the subject was superfluous. Although Gratiolet emphatically denies 15 that any muscle has been developed solely for the sake of ex- pression, he seems never to have reflected on the principle of evolution. He apparently looks at each species as a separate creation. So it is Avith the other writers on Expression. For instance, Dr. Duchenne, after speaking of the movements of the limbs, refers to those which give expression to the face, and remarks : 16 " Le createur n'a done pas eu a se " preoccuper ici des besoins de la mecanique ; il a '•' pu, selon sa sagesse, ou — que Ton me pardonne " cette maniere de parler— par une divine fantaisie, u mettre en action tel ou tel muscle, un seul ou plu- " sieurs muscles a la fois, lorsqu'il a voulu que les * signes caractenstiques des passions, meme les plus 14 'Anatomy of Expression,' pp. 121, 138. 15 'De la Physionomie,' pp. 12, 73. 16 4 Mecanisme de la Physionomie Humaine,' 8vo edit. p. 31. 12 INTRODUCTION. " fugaces, fussent ecrits passagerement sur la face de * l'homme. Ce langage de la physionomie une fois " cree, il lui a suffi, pour le rend re universel et im- " muable, de donner a tout etre humain la faculte " instinctive d'exprimer toujours ses sentiments par H la contraction des memes muscles." Many writers consider the whole subject of Expression as inexplicable. Thus the illustrious physiologist Mnller, says, 17 " The completely different expression of the " features in different passions shows that, according to " the kind of feeling excited, entirely different groups " of the fibres of the facial nerve are acted on. Of the " cause of this we are quite ignorant." No doubt as long as m'an and all other animals are viewed as independent creations, an effectual stop is put to our natural desire to investigate as far as possible the causes of Expression. By this doctrine, anything and everything can be equally well explained ; and it has proved as pernicious with respect to Expression as to every other branch of natural history. With mankind some expressions, such as the bristling of the hair under the influence of extreme terror, or the un- covering of the teeth under that of furious rage, can hardly be understood, except on the belief that man once existed in a much lower and animal-like condition. The community of certain expressions in distinct though allied species, as in the movements, of the same facial muscles during laughter by man and by various mon- keys, is rendered somewhat more intelligible, if we believe in their descent from a common progenitor. He who admits on general grounds that the structure and habits of all animals have been gradually evolved, will look at the whole subject of Expression in a new and interesting light. 17 4 Elements of Physiology,' English translation, vol. ii. p. 934. INTRODUCTION. 13 The study of Expression is difficult, owing to the movements being often extremely slight, and of a fleeting nature. A difference may be clearly per- ceived, and yet it may be impossible, at least I have found it so, to state in what the difference consists. When we witness any deep emotion, our sympathy is so strongly excited, that close observation is forgotten or rendered almost impossible ; of which fact I have had many curious proofs. Our imagination is another' and still more serious source of error ; for if from the nature of the circumstances we expect to see any ex- pression, w r e readily imagine its presence. Notwith- standing Dr. Duchenne's great experience, he for a long time fancied, as he states, that several muscles contracted under certain emotions, whereas he ulti- mately convinced himself that the movement was confined to a single muscle. In order to acquire as good a foundation as possible, and to ascertain, independently of common opinion, how far particular movements of the features and gestures are really expressive of certain states of the . mind, I have found the following means the most serviceable. In the first place, to observe infants; for they exhibit many emotions, as Sir C. Bell remarks, " with extraordinary force whereas, in after life, some of our expressions " cease to have the pure and simple " source from which they spring in infancy." 18 In the second place, it occurred to me that the insane ought to be studied, as they are liable to the strongest passions, and give uncontrolled vent to them. I had, myself, no opportunity of doing this, so I applied to Dr. Maudsley, and received from him an intro- duction to Dr. J. Crichton Browne, who has charge ' ? ' Anatomy of Expression,' 3rd edit. p. 198. 14 INTRODUCTION. of an immense asylum near Wakefield, and who, as I found, had already attended to the subject. This excellent observer has with unwearied kindness sent me copious notes and descriptions, with . valuable sug- gestions on many points ; and I can hardly over-esti- mate the value of his assistance. I owe also, to the kindness of Mr. Patrick Nicol, of the Sussex Lunatic Asylum, interesting statements on two or three points. Thirdly, Dr. Duchenne galvanized, as we have al- ready seen, certain muscles in the face of an old man, whose skin was little sensitive, and thus produced various expressions which were photographed on a large scale. It fortunately occurred to me to show several of the best plates, without a word of explana- tion, to above twenty educated persons of various ages and both sexes, asking them, in each case, by what emotion or feeling the old man was supposed to be agitated; and I recorded their answers in the words which they used. Several of the expressions were instantly recognised by almost everyone, though de- scribed in not exactly the same terms ; and these may, I think, be relied on as truthful, and will hereafter be t specified. On the other hand, the most widely different judgments were pronounced in regard to some of them. This exhibition was of use in another way, by convin- cing me how easily we may be misguided by our imagi- nation ; fur when I first looked through Dr. Duchenne's photographs, reading at the same time the text, and thus learning what was intended, I was struck with admiration at the truthfulness of all, with only a few exceptions. Nevertheless, if I had examined them with- out any explanation, no doubt I should have been as much perplexed, in some cases, as other persons have been. Fourthly, I had hoped to derive much aid from the great masters in painting and sculpture, who are such INTRODUCTION". 15 close observers. Accordingly, I have looked at photo- graphs and engravings of many well-known works; but, with a few exceptions, have not thus profited. The reason no doubt is, that in works of art, beauty is the chief object; and strongly contracted facial muscles destroy beauty. 19 The story of the composi- tion is generally told with wonderful force and truth by skilfully given accessories. Fifthly, it seemed to me highly important to ascer- tain whether the same expressions and gestures prevail, as has often been asserted without much evidence, with all the races of mankind, especially with those who have associated but little with Europeans. Whenever the same movements of the features or body express the same emotions in several distinct races of man, we may infer with much probability, that such expressions are true ones, — that is, are innate or instinctive. Con- ventional expressions or gestures, acquired by the individual during early life, would probably have dif- fered in the different races, in the same manner as do their languages. Accordingly I circulated, early in the year 1867, the following printed queries with a request, which has been fully responded to, that actual observations, and not memory, might be trusted. These queries were written after a considerable interval of time, during which my attention had been otherwise directed, and I can now see that they might have been greatly improved. To some of the later copies, I appended, in manuscript, a few additional remarks : — (1.) Is astonishment expressed by trie eyes and mouth being opened wide, and by the eyebrows being raised ? (2.) Does shame excite a blush when the colour of the skin allows it to be visible ? and especially how low down the body does the blush extend ? 19 See remarks to this effect in Lessing's ' Laocoon,' translated by W. Ross, 1836, p. 19. 16 INTRODUCTION. (3.) When a man is indignant or defiant does he frown, hold his body and head erect, square his shoulders and clench his fists ? (4.) When considering deeply on any subject, or trying to under- stand any puzzle, does he frown, or wrinkle the skin beneath the lower eyelids ? (5.) When in low spirits, are the corners of the mouth depressed, and the inner corner of the eyebrows raised by that muscle which the French call the " Grief muscle " ? The eyebrow in this state becomes slightly oblique, with a little swelling at the inner end ; and the forehead is transversely wrinkled in the middle part, but not across the whole breadth, as when the eyebrows are raised in surprise. (6.) When in good spirits do the eyes sparkle, with the skin a little wrinkled round and under them, and with the mouth a little drawn back at the corners? (7.) When a man sneers or snarls at another, is the corner of the upper lip over the canine or eye tooth raised on the side facing the man whom he addresses ? (8.) Can a dogged or obstinate expression be recognized, which is chiefly shown by the mouth being firmly closed, a lowering brow and a slight frown ? (9.) Is contempt expressed by a slight protrusion of the lips and by turning up the nose, with a slight expiration ? (10.) Is disgust shown by the lower lip being turned down, the upper lip slightly raised, with a sudden expiration, something like incipient vomiting, or like something spit out of the mouth ? (11.) Is extreme fear expressed in the same general manner as with Europeans ? (12.) Is laughter ever carried to such an extreme as to bring tears into the eyes ? (13.) When a man wishes to show that he cannot prevent something being done, or cannot himself do something, does he shrug his shoulders, turn inwards his elbows, extend outwards his hands and open the palms ; with the eyebrows raised ? (14.) Do the children when sulky, pout or greatly protrude the lips ? (15.) Can guilty, or sly, or jealous expressions be recognized? though I know not how these can be defined. (16.) Is the head nodded vertically in affirmation, and shaken la- terally in negation ? Observations on natives who have had little communication with Europeans would be of course the most valuable, though those made on any natives would be of much interest to me. General remarks on expression are of comparatively little value ; and memory is so deceptive that I earnestly beg it may not be trusted. A definite description of the countenance under any emotion or frame of mind, with a statement of the circumstances under which it occurred, would possess much value. INTRODUCTION. 17 To these queries I have received thirty-six answers from different observers, several of them missionaries or protectors of the aborigines, to all of whom I am deeply indebted for the great trouble which they have taken, and for the valuable aid thus received. I will specify their names, &c, towards the close of this chapter, so as not to interrupt my present remarks. The answers relate to several of the most distinct and savage races of man. In many instances, the circumstances have been recorded under which each expression was observed, and the expression itself described. In such cases, much confidence may be placed in the answers. When the answers have b^en simply yes or no, I have always received them with caution. It follows, from the information thus acquired, that the same state of mind is expressed throughout the world with remarkable uniformity; and this fact is in itself interesting, as evidence of the close simi- larity in bodily structure ana mental disposition of all the races of mankind . Sixthly, and lastly, I have attended, as closely as I could, to the expression of the several passions in some of the commoner animals ; and this I believe to be of paramount importance, not" of course for deciding how far in man certain expressions are characteristic of certain states of mind, but as affording the safest basis for generalisation on the- causes, or origin, of the various movements of Expression. In observing animals, we are not so likely to be biassed by our imagination ; and we may feel safe that their expressions are not conventional. From the reasons above assigned, namely, the fleeting nature of some expressions (the changes in the features being often extremely slight) ; our sympathy being easily aroused when we behold any strong emotion, 18 INTRODUCTION. and our attention thus distracted ; our imagination deceiving us, from knowing in a vague manner what to expect, though certainly few of us know what the exact changes in the countenance are ; and lastly, even our long familiarity with the subject, — from all these causes combined, the observation of Expression is by no means easy, as many persons, whom I have asked to observe certain points, have soon discovered. Hence it is difficult to determine, with certainty, what are the movements of the features and of the body, which commonly characterize certain states of the mind. Nevertheless, some of the doubts and difficulties have, as I hope, been cleared away by the observation of infants, — of the insane, — of the different races of man, — of works of art, — and lastly, of the facial muscles under the action of galvanism, as effected by Dr. Duchenne. But there remains the much greater difficulty of understanding the cause or origin of the several ex- pressions, and of judging whether any theoretical explanation is trustworthy. Besides, judging as well as we can by our reason, without the aid of any rules, which of two or more explanations is the most satis- factory, or are quite unsatisfactory, I see only one way of testing our conclusions. This is to observe whether the same principle by which one expression can, as it appears, be explained, is applicable in other allied cases ; and especially, whether the same general prin- ciples can. be applied with satisfactory results, both to man and the lower animals. This latter method, I am inclined to think, is the most serviceable of all. The difficulty of judging of the truth of any theoretical explanation, and of testing it by some distinct line of investigation, is the great drawback to that interest which the study seems well fitted to excite. INTRODUCTION. 19 Finally, with respect to my own observations, I may state that they were commenced in the year 1838 ; and, from that time to the present day, I have occa- sionally attended to the subject. At the above date, I was already inclined to believe in the principle of evolution, or of the derivation of species from other and lower forms. Consequently, when I read Sir C. Bell's great work, his view, that man had been created with certain muscles specially adapted for the expression of his feelings, struck me as unsatisfactory. It seemed probable that the habit of expressing our feelings by certain movements, though now rendered innate, had been in some manner gradually acquired. But to dis- cover how such habits had been acquired was perplexing in no small degree. The whole subject had to be viewed under a new aspect, and each expression de- manded a rational explanation. This belief led me to attempt the present work, however imperfectly it may have been executed. I will now give the names of the gentlemen to whom, as I have said, I am deeply indebted for information in regard to the expressions exhibited by various races of man, and I will specify some of the circumstances under which the observations were in each case made. Owing to the great kindness and powerful influence of Mr. Wilson, of Hayes Place, Kent, I have received from Australia no less than thirteen sets of answers to my queries. This has been particularly fortunate, as the Australian aborigines rank amongst the most distinct of all the races of man. It will be seen that the observa- tions have been chiefly made in the south, in the out- lying parts of the colony of Victoria ; but some excel- lent answers have been received from the north. 20 INTRODUCTION. Mr. Dyson Lacy has given me in detail some* valu- able observations, made several hundred miles in the interior of Queensland. To Mr. R. Brough Smyth, of Melbourne, I am much indebted for observations made by himself, and for sending me several of the following letters, namely : — From the Rev. Mr. Hagenauer, of Lake Wellington, a missionary in Gippsland, Victoria, who has had much experience with the natives. From Mr. Samuel Wilson, a landowner, residing at Langere- nong, Wimmera, Victoria. From the Rev. George Taplin, superintendent of the native Industrial Settle- ment at Port Macleay. From Mr. Archibald G. Lang, of Coranderik, Victoria, a teacher at a school where aborigines, old and young, are collected from all parts of the colony. From Mr. H. B. Lane, of Belfast, Vic- toria, a police magistrate and warden, whose observa- tions, as I am assured, are highly trustworthy. From Mr. Templeton Bimnett, of Echuca, whose station is on the borders of the colony of Victoria, and who has thus been able to -observe many aborigines who have had little intercourse with white men. He compared his observations with those made by two other gentlemen long resident in the neighbourhood. Also from Mr. J. Bulmer, a missionary in a remote part of Gippsland, Victoria. I am also indebted to the distinguished botanist, Dr. Ferdinand Muller, of Victoria, for some observations made by himself, and for sending me others made by Mrs. Green, as well as for some of the foregoing letters. In regard to the Maoris of New Zealand, the Rev. J. W. Stack has answered only a few of my queries ; but the answers have been remarkably full, clear, and distinct, with the circumstances recorded under which the observations were made. INTRODUCTION. 21 The Kajah Brooke has given me some information with respect to the Dyaks of Borneo. Respecting the Malays, I have been highly successful ; for Mr. F. Geach (to whom I was introduced by Mr. Wallace), during his residence as a mining engineer in the interior of Malacca, observed many natives, who had never before associated with white men. He wrote me two long letters with admirable and detailed observa- tions on their expression. He likewise observed the Chinese immigrants in the Malay archipelago. The well-known naturalist, H.M. Consul, Mr. Swinhoe, also observed for me the Chinese in their native country ; and he made inquiries from others whom he could trust. In India Mr. H. Erskine, whilst residing in his official capacity in the Admednugur District in the Bombay Presidency, attended to the expression of the inhabitants, but found much difficulty in arriving at any safe con- clusions, owing to their habitual concealment of all emotions in the presence of Europeans. He also obtained information for me from Mr. West, the Judge in Canara, and he consulted some intelligent native gentlemen on certain points. In Calcutta Mr. J. Scott, curator of the Botanic Gardens, carefully observed the various tribes of men therein employed during a con- siderable period, and no one has sent me such full and valuable details. The habit of accurate observation, gained by his botanical studies, has been brought to bear on our present subject. For Ceylon I am much indebted to the Rev. 8. 0. Glenie for answers to some of my queries. Turning to Africa, I have been unfortunate with respect to the negroes, though Mr. Winwood Reade aided me as far as lay in his power. It would have been comparatively easy to have obtained information in 22 INTRODUCTION. regard to the negro slaves in America ; but as they have long associated with white men, such observations would have possessed little value. In the southern parts of the continent Mrs. Barber observed the Kafirs and Fingoes, and sent me many distinct answers. Mr. J. P. Mansel Weale also made some observations on the natives, and procured for me a curious document, namely, the opinion, written in English, of Christian Gaika, brother of the Chief Sandilli, on the expressions of his fellow-countrymen. In the northern regions of Africa Captain Speedy, who long resided with the Abyssinians, answered my queries partly from memory and partly from observations made on the son of King Theodore, who was then under his charge. Professor and Mrs. Asa Gray attended to some points in the expressions of the natives, as observed by them whilst ascending the Nile. On the great American continent Mr. Bridges, a catechist residing with the Fuegians, answered some few questions about their expression, addressed to him many years ago. In the northern half of the con- tinent Dr. Kothrock attended to the expressions of the wild Atnah and Espy ox tribes on the Nasse Kiver, in North-Western America. Mr. Washington Matthews, Assistant-Surgeon in the United States Army, also ob- served with special care (after having seen my queries, as printed in the ' Smithsonian Eeport ') some of the wildest tribes in the Western parts of the United States, namely, the Tetdns, Gros ventres, Mandans, and Assina- boines; and his answers have proved of the highest value. Lastly, besides these special sources of information, I have collected some few facts incidentally given in books of travels. % , INTRODUCTION. As I shall often have to refer, more especially in the latter part of this volume, to the muscles of the human face, I have had a diagram (tig. 1) copied and reduced from Sir C. Bell's work, and two others, with more accurate de- tails (figs. 2 and 3), from Henle's well-known ' Handbuch der Systematischen Anatomie des Menschen.' The same letters refer to the same muscles in all three figures, but the names are given of only the more important ones to which I shall have to allude. The facial muscles blend much together, and, as I am informed, hardly appear on a dissected face so distinct as they are here repre- sented. Some writers consider that these muscles con- sist of nineteen pairs, with one unpaired ; 20 but others make the number much larger, amounting even to fifty-five, according to Moreau. They are, as is ad- mitted by everyone who has written on the subject, very variable in structure ; and Moreau remarks that they are hardly alike in half-a-dozen subjects. 21 They are also variable in function. Thus the power of un- covering the canine tooth on one side differs much in different persons. The power of raising the wings of the nostrils is also, according to Dr. Piderit, 22 variable in a remarkable degree ; and other such cases could be given. Finally, I must have the pleasure of expressing my obligations to Mr. Kejlander for the trouble which he has taken in photographing for me various expressions and gestures. I am also indebted to Herr Kindermann. of Hamburg, for the loan of some excellent negatives of crying infants; and to Dr. Wallich for a charming one 20 Mr. Partridge in Todd's • Cyclopaedia of Anatomy and Physiology,' vol. ii. p. 227. 21 ' La Pliysionomio,' par G. Lavater, torn. iv. 1820, p. 274. On the number of the facial muscles, see vol. iv. pp. 209-211. 22 'Mimik und Pliysiognomik/ 1867, s. 91. INTRODUCTION. Fig. 1. Diagram of the muscles of tbe lace, from Sir C. Bell. Fig. 2. Diagram from Henle. INTRODUCTION. 25 A ... Fig. 3. Diagram from Henle. A. Occipi to-frontal is, or frontal muscle. b. Corrugator supercilii, or corrugator muscle. c. Orbicularis palpebrarum, or orbicu- lar muscles of tbe eyes. i>. Pyramidalis nasi, or pyramidal muscle of the nose. k. Levator labii superioris alajque nasi. f. Levator labii proprius. g. Zygomatic. H. Malaris. i. Little zygomatic. k. Triangularis oris, or depressor an- guli oris. L. Quadratus menti. m. Kisorius, part -of the Flatysma myoides. of a smiling girl. I have already expressed my obliga- tions to Dr. Duchenne for generously permitting me to have some of his large photographs copied and reduced. All these photographs have been printed by the Helio- type process, and the accuracy of the copy is thus guaranteed. These plates are referred to by Roman numerals. I am also greatly indebted to Mr. T. W. Wood for the extreme pains which he has taken in drawing from 26 INTRODUCTION. life the expressions of various animals. A distinguished artist, Mr. liiviere, has had the kindness to give me two drawings of dogs — one in a hostile and the other in a humble and caressing frame of mind. Mr. A. May has also given me two similar sketches of dogs. Mr. Cooper has taken much care in cutting the blocks. Some of the photographs and drawings, namely, those by Mr. May, and those by Mr. Wolf oT the Cynopithecus, were first reproduced by Mr. Cooper on wood by means of photography, and then engraved: by this means almost complete fidelity is ensured. CHAPTER I. General Principles of Expression. The three chief principles stated — The first principle — Serviceable actions become habitual in association with certain states of the mind, and are performed whether or not of service in each par- ticular case — The force of habit — Inheritance — Associated habitual movements in man — Reflex actions — Passage of habits into reflex actions — Associated habitual movements in the lower animals — Concluding remarks. I will begin by giving the three Principles, which appear to me to account for most of the expressions and gestures involuntarily used by man and the lower animals, under the influence of various emotions and sensations. 1 I arrived, however, at these three Prin- ciples only at the close of my observations. They will be discussed in the present and two following chapters in a general manner. Facts observed both with man and the lower animals will here be made use of ; but the latter facts are preferable, as less likely to deceive us. In the fourth and fifth chapters, I will describe the special expressions of some of the lower animals ; and in the succeeding chapters those of man. Everyone will thus be able to judge for himself, how far my three principles throw light on the theory of the subject. It appears to me that so many expres- sions are thus explained in a fairly satisfactory manner, 1 Mr. Herbert Spencer ('Essays,' Second Series, 1803, p. 138) has drawn a clear distinction between emotions and sensations, the latter being " generated in our corporeal framework." He classes as Feelings both emotions and sensations. 28 THE PKINCIPLE OF Chap. I. that probably all will hereafter be found to come under the same or closely analogous heads. I need hardly premise that movements or changes in any part of the body, — as the wagging of a dog's tail, the drawing back of a horse's ears, the shrugging of a man's shoul- ders, or the dilatation of the capillary vessels of the skin, — may all equally well serve for expression. The three Principles are as follows. I. The principle of serviceable associated Habits. — Certain complex actions are of direct or indirect ser- vice under certain states of the mind, in order to relieve or gratify certain sensations, desires, &c. ; and when- # ever the same state of mind is induced, however feebly, there is a tendency through the force of habit and association for the same movements to be performed, though they may not then be of the least use. Some actions ordinarily associated through habit with certain states of the mind may be partially repressed through the will, and in such cases the muscles which are least under the separate control of the will are the most liable still to act, causing movements which we recog- nise as expressive. In certain other cases the checking of one habitual movement requires other slight move- ments ; and these are likewise expressive. II. The principle of Antithesis. — Certain states of the mind lead to certain habitual actions, which are of service, as under our first principle. Now when a directly opposite state of mind is induced, there is a strong and involuntary tendency to the performance of movements of a directly opposite nature, though these are of no use ; and such movements are in some cases highly expressive. III. The principle of actions due to the constitution of the Nervous System, independently from the first of the Willy and independently to a certain extent of Habit — Chap. I. SERVICEABLE ASSOCIATED HABITS, 29 When the sensoriuni is strongly excited, nerve-force is generated in excess, and is transmitted in certain definite directions, depending on the connection of the nerve-cells, and partly on habit : or the supply of nerve-force may, as it appears, be interrupted. Effects are thus produced which we recognise as expressive. This third principle may, for the sake of brevity, be called that of the direct action of the nervous system. With respect to our first Principle, it is notorious how powerful is the force of habit. The most complex and difficult movements can in time be performed with- out the least effort or consciousness. It is not posi- tively known how it comes that habit is so efficient in facilitating complex movements; but physiologists admit 2 u that the conducting power of the nervous " fibres increases with the frequency of their excite- " ment." This applies to the nerves of motion and sensation, as well as to those connected with the act of thinking. That some physical change is produced in the nerve-cells or nerves which are habitually used can hardly be doubted, for otherwise it is impossible to understand how the tendency to certain acquired move- ments is inherited. That they are inherited we see with horses in certain transmitted paces, such as can- tering and ambling, which are not natural to them, — in the pointing of young pointers and the setting of young setters — in the peculiar manner of flight of cer- tain breeds of the pigeon, &c. We have analogous cases with mankind in the inheritance of tricks or unusual gestures, to which we 'shall presently recur. 2 Miillor, 1 Elements of Physiology,' Eng. translat. vol. ii. p. 939. See also Mr. H. -Spencer's interesting speculations on the same subject, and on the genesis of nerves, in his 'Principles of Biology,' vol ii. p. 346 ; and in his ' Principles of Psychology,' 2nd edit. pp. 511-557. 30 THE PRINCIPLE OF Chap. I. To those who admit the gradual evolution of species, a most striking instance of the perfection with which the most difficult consensual movements can be trans- mitted, is afforded by the humming-bird Sphinx-moth (Macroglossa) ; for this moth, shortly after its emer- gence from the cocoon, as shown by the bloom on its unruffled scales, may be seen poised stationary in the air, with its long hair-like proboscis uncurled and in- serted into the minute orifices of flowers ; and no one, I believe, has ever seen this moth learning to perform its difficult task, which requires such unerring aim. When there exists an inherited or instinctive ten- dency to the performance of an action, or an in- herited taste for certain kinds of food, some degree of habit in the individual is often .or generally requisite. We find this in the paces of the horse, and to a certain extent in the pointing of dogs ; although some young dogs point excellently the first time they are taken out, yet they often associate the proper inherited attitude with a wrong odour, and even with eyesight. I have heard it asserted that if a calf be allowed to suck its mother only once, it is much more diffi- cult afterwards to rear it by hand. 3 Caterpillars which have been fed on the leaves of one kind of tree, have been known to perish from hunger rather than to eat the leaves of another tree, although Uiis afforded them their proper food, under a state of nature ; 4 and so it is in many other cases. 3 A remark to much the same effect was made long ago by Hippo- crates and by the illustrious Harvey ; for both assert that a young animal forgets in the course of a few days tiie art of sucking, and cannot without some difficulty again acquire it. I give these assertions on the authority of Dr. Darwin, 4 Zoonomia,' 1794, vol. i. p. 140. 4 See for my authorities, and for various analogous facts, ' The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication/ 1868, vol. ii. p. 304. Chap. I. SEKVICEABLE ASSOCIATED HABITS. 31 The power of Association is admitted by everyone. Mr. Bain remarks, that "actions, sensations, and states " of feeling, occurring together or in close succession, " tend to grow together, or cohere, in such a way that " when any one of them is afterwards presented to the " mind, the others are apt to be brought up in idea." 5 It is so important for our purpose fully to recognise that actions readily become associated with other actions and with various states of the mind, that I will give a good many instances, in the first place relating to man, and afterwards to the lower animals. Some of the instances are of a very trifling nature, but they are as good for our purpose as more important habits. It is known to everyone how difficult, or even impossible it is, without repeated trials, to move the limbs in certain opposed directions which have never been practised. Analogous cases occur with sensations, as in the com- mon experiment of rolling a marble beneath the tips of two crossed fingers, when it feels exactly like two marbles. Everyone protects himself when falling to the ground by extending his arms, and as Professor Alison has remarked, few can resist acting thus, when voluntarily falling on a soft bed. A man when going out of doors puts on his gloves quite unconsciously ; and this may seem an extremely simple operation, but he who has taught a child to put on gloves, knows that this is by no means the case. When our minds are much affected, so are the move- ments of our bodies; but here another principle be- 5 'The Senses and the Intellect/ 2nd edit. 1864, p. 332. Prof. Huxley remarks (' Elementary Lessons in Physiology,' 5th edit. 1872, p. 30G), " It may be laid down as a rule, that, if any two mental states " be called up together, or in succession, with due frequency and vivid- " ness, the subsequent production of the one of them will suffice to call " up the other, and that whether we desire it or not." 32 THE PRINCIPLE OF Chap, t sides habit, namely the undirected overflow of nerve- force, partially conies into play. Norfolk, in speaking of Cardinal Wolsey, says — *' Some strange commotion Is in his brain ; he bites his lip and starts ; Stops on a sudden, looks upon the ground, Then, lays his finger on his temple : straight, Springs out into fast gait ; then, stops again, Strikes his breast hard ; and anon, he casts His eye against the moon: in most strange postures We have seen him set himself." — Hen. VIII., act 3, sc. 2. A vulgar man often scratches his head when per- plexed in mind ; and I believe that he acts thus from habit, as if he experienced a slightly uncomfortable bodily sensation, namely, the itching of his head, to which he is particularly liable, and which he thus re- lieves. Another man rubs his eyes when perplexed, or gives a little cough when embarrassed, acting in either case as if he felt a slightly uncomfortable sensation in his eyes or windpipe. 6 From the continued use of the eyes, these organs are especially liable to be acted on through association under various states of the mind, although there is mani- festly nothing to be seen. A man, as Gratiolet remarks, who vehemently rejects a proposition, will almost cer- tainly shut his eyes or turn away his face ; but if he accepts the proposition, he will nod his head in affirma- tion and open his eyes widely. The man acts in this latter case as if he clearly saw the thing, and in the former case as if he did not or would not see it. I have noticed that persons in describing a horrid sight often shut their eyes momentarily and firmly, or shake 6 Gratiolet (' De la Physionomie,' p. 324), in his discussion on this subject, gives many analogous instances. See p. 42, on the opening and shutting of the eyes. Engel i3 quoted (p. 323) on the changed paces of a man, as his thoughts change. Chap. L SERVICEABLE ASSOCIATED HABITS. 33 their heads, as if not to see or to drive away some- thing disagreeable ; and I have caught myself, when thinking in the dark of a horrid spectacle, closing my eyes firmly. In looking suddenly at any object, or in looking all around, everyone raises his eyebrows, so that the eyes may be quickly and widely opened ; and Duckenne remarks that 7 a person in trying to remember something often raises his eyebrows, as if to see it. A Hindoo gentleman made exactly the same remark to Mr. Erskine in regard to his countrymen. I noticed a young lady earnestly trying to recollect a painter's name, and she first looked to one corner of the ceiling and then to the opposite corner, arching the one eyebrow on that side ; although, of course, there was nothing to be seen there. In most of the foregoing cases, we can understand how the associated movements were acquired through habit ; but with some individuals, certain strange gestures or tricks have arisen in association with certain states of the mind, owing to wholly inexplicable causes, and are undoubtedly inherited. I have elsewhere given one instance from my own observation of an extraordinary and complex gesture, associated with pleasurable feel- ings, which was transmitted from a father to his daughter, as well as some other analogous facts. 8 7 1 Me'canisme de la Physionomie Humaine,' 18G2, p. 17. 8 1 The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication/ vol. ii. p. 6. The inheritance of habitual gestures is so important for us, that I gladly avail myself of Mr. F. Galton's permission to give in his own words the following remarkable case: — "The following account " of a habit occurring in individuals of three consecutive generations is " of peculiar interest, because it occurs only during sound sleep, and " therefore cannot be due to imitation, but must be altogether natural. " The particulars are perfectly trustworthy, for I have enquired fully " into them, and speak from abundant and independent evidence. A •' gentleman of considerable position was found by his wife to have " the curiuus trick, when he lay fast asleep on his back in bed, of 34 THE PRINCIPLE OF CnAr. I Another curious instance of an odd inherited move- ment, associated with the wish to obtain an object, will be given in the course of this volume. There are other actions which are commonly per- formed under certain circumstances, independently of habit, and which seem to be due to imitation or some sort of sympathy. Thus persons cutting anything with a pair of scissors may be seen to move their jaws simultaneously with the blades of the scissors. Children learning to write often twist about their tongues as their fingers move, in a ridiculous fashion. When a public singer suddenly becomes a little hoarse, many of those present may be heard, as I have been " raising his right arm slowly in front of his face, np to his forehead, " and then dropping it with a jerk, bo that the wrist fell heavily on " the bridge of his nose. The trick did not occur every night, but " occasionally, and was independent of any ascertained cause. Some- " times it was repeated incessantly foT an hour or more. The gentle- " man's nose was prominent, and its bridge often became sore from the " blows which it received. At one time an awkward sore was pro- " duced, that was long in healing, on account of the recurrence, n'ght •* after night, of the blows which first caused it. His wife had to remove •' the button from the wrist of his night-gown as it made severe scratches, 14 and some means were attempted of tying his arm. Many years after his death, his son married a lady who had never " heard of the family incident. She, however, observed precisely the " same peculiarity in her husband ; but his nose, from not being par- " ticularly prominent, has never as yet suffered from the blows. The " trick does not occur when he is half-asleep, as, for example, when " dozing in his arm-chair, but the moment he is fast asleep it is " apt to begin. It is, as with his father, intermittent ; sometimes " ceasing for many nights, and sometimes almost incessant during a part " of every night. It is performed, as it was by his father, with his right " hand. " One of his children, a girl, has inherited the same trick. She per- " forms it, likewise, with the right hand, but in a slightly modified " form ; for, after raising the arm, she does not allow the wrist to drop " upon the bridge of the nose, but the palm of the half-closed hand " tails over and down the nose, striking it rather rapidly. It is also " very intermittent with this child, not occurring for periods of some f months, but sometimes occurring almost incessantly." Chap. I. SERVICEABLE ASSOCIATED HABITS. 35 assured by a gentleman on whom I can rely, to clear their throats ; but here habit probably comes into play, as we clear our own throats under similar circumstances. I have also been told that at leaping matches, as the performer makes his spring, many of the spectators, generally men and boys, move their feet; but here again habit probably comes into play, for it is very doubtful whether women would thus act. Reflex actions. — Reflex actions, in the strict sense of the term, are due to the excitement of a peripheral nerve, which transmits its influence to certain nerve- cells, and these in their turn excite certain muscles or glands into action ; and all this may take place without any sensation or consciousness on our part, though often thus accompanied. As many reflex actions are highly expressive, the subject must here be noticed at some little length. We shall also see that some of them graduate into, and can hardly be distinguished from actions which have arisen through habit. 9 Coughing and sneezing are familiar instances of reflex actions. With infants the first act of respiration is often a sneeze, although this requires the co-ordinated movement of numerous muscles. Respiration is partly voluntary, but mainly reflex, and is performed in the most natural and best manner without the interference of the will. A vast number of complex movements are reflex. As good an instance as can be given is the often-quoted one of a decapitated frog, which cannot of course feel, and cannot 9 Prof. Huxley remarks (' Elementary Physiology,' 5th edit. p. 305) that reflex actions proper to the spinal cord are natural; but, by the help of the brain, that is through habit, an infiniiy of artificial reflex actions may be acquired. Virehow admits (* Sammlung wisseiischaft. Yortrage,' &c, " Ueber das Riickenmark," 1871, ss. 24, 31) that some reflex actions can hardly be distinguished from instincts ; and, of the latter, it may be added, some cannot be distinguished from in- herited habits. 36 THE PRINCIPLE OF Chap. I consciously perform, any movement. Yet if a drop of acid be placed on the lower surface of the thigh of a frog in this state, it will rub off the drop with the upper surface of the foot of the same leg. If this foot be cut off, it cannot thus act. " After some fruitless efforts, " therefore, it gives up trying in that way, seems " restless, as though, says Pfluger, it was seeking some " other way, and at last it makes use of the foot of the " other leg and succeeds in rubbing off the acid. Notably " we have here not merely contractions of muscles, but " combined and harmonized contractions in due sequence " for a special purpose. These are actions that have " all the appearance of being guided by intelligence and " instigated by will in an animal, the recognized organ " of whose intelligence and will has been removed." 10 ' We see the difference between reflex and voluntary movements in very young children not being able to perforin, as I am informed by Sir Henry Holland, certain acts somewhat analogous to those of sneezing and coughing, namely, in their not being able to blow their noses (i. e. to compress the nose and blow violently through the passage), and in their not being able to clear their throats of phlegm. They have to learn to perform these acts, yet they are performed by us, when a little older, almost as easily as reflex actions. Sneezing and coughing, however, can be controlled by the will only partially or not at all; whilst the clearing the throat and blowing the nose are completely under our command. When we are conscious of the presence of an irritating particle in our nostrils or windpipe — that is, when the same sensory nerve-cells are excited, as in the case of sneezing and coughing — we can voluntarily expel the 19 Dr. Maudsley, ' Body and Mind/ 1870, p. 8. Chap. I. SERVICEABLE ASSOCIATED HABITS. 37 particle by forcibly driving air through these passages ; but we cannot do this with nearly the same force, rapidity, and precision, as by a reflex action. In this latter case the sensory nerve-cells apparently excite the motor nerve-cells without any waste of power by first communicating with the cerebral hemispheres — the seat of our consciousness and volition. In all cases there seems to exist a profound antagonism between the same movements, as directed by the will and by a reflex stimulant, in the force with which they are performed and in the facility with which they are excited. As Claude Bernard asserts, " L'influence du cerveau tend " done a entraver les mouvements reflexes, a limiter " leur force et leur etendue." 11 The conscious wish to perform a reflex action some- times stops or interrupts its performance, though the proper sensory nerves may be stimulated. For in- stance, many years ago I laid a small wager with a dozen young men that they would not sneeze if they took snuff, although they all declared that they in- variably did so; accordingly they all took a pi neb, but from wishing much to succeed,.not one sneezed, though their eyes watered, and all, without exception, had to pay me the wager. Sir H. Holland remarks 12 th t attention paid to the act of swallowing interferes with the proper movements ; from which it probably follows, at least in part, that some persons find it so difficult to swallow a pill. Another familiar instance of a reflex action is the involuntary closing of the eyelids when the surface of the eye is touched. A similar winking movement is caused when a blow is directed towards the face ; but 11 See the very interesting discussion on the whole subject by Claude Bernard, 1 Tissus Vivants,' 18G6, pp. 353-356. 12 ' Chapters on Mental Physiology,' 1858, p. 85. 88 THE PRINCIPLE OF Chap. I. this is an habitual and not a strictly reflex action, as the stimulus is conveyed through the mind and not by the excitement of a peripheral nerve. The whole body and head are generally at the same time drawn suddenly backwards. These latter movements, however, can be prevented, if the danger does not appear to the imagi- nation imminent ; but our reason telling us that there is no danger does not suffice. I may mention a trifling fact, illustrating this point, and which at the time amused me. I put my face close to the thick glass- plate in front of a puff-adder in the Zoological Gardens, with the firm determination of not starting back if the snake struck at me ; but, as soon as the blow Avas struck, my resolution went for nothing, and I jumped a yard or two backwards with astonishing rapidity. My will and reason were powerless against the imagination of a danger which had never been experienced. The violence of a start seems to depend partly on the vividness of the imagination, and partly on the con- dition, either habitual or temporary, of the nervous system. He who will attend to the starting of his horse, when tired and fresh, will perceive how per- fect is the gradation from a mere glance at some unex- pected object, with a momentary doubt whether it is dangerous, to a jump so rapid and violent, that the animal probably could not voluntarily whirl round in so rapid a manner. The nervous system of a fresh and highly-fed horse sends its order to the motory system so quickly, that no time is allowed for him to consider whether or not the danger is real. After one violent start, when he is excited and the blood flows freely through his brain, he is very apt to start again ; and so it . is, as I have noticed, with young infants. A start from a sudden noise, when the stimulus is Chap. I. SERVICEABLE ASSOCIATED HABITS. 39 conveyed through the auditory nerves, is always accom- panied in grown-up persons by the winking of the eye- lids. 13 I observed, however, that though my infants started at sudden sounds, when under a fortnight old, they certainly did not always wink their eyes, and I be- lieve never did so. The start of an older infant appa- rently represents a vague catching hold of something to prevent falling. I shook a pasteboard box close before the eyes of one of my infants, when 114 days old, and it did not in the least wink; but when I put a few comfits into the box, holding it in the same position as before, and rattled them, the child blinked its eyes violently every time, and started a little. It was ob- viously impossible that a carefully-guarded infant could have learnt by experience that a rattling sound near its eyes indicated danger tp them. But such experience will have been slowly gained at "a later age during a long series of generations ; and from what we know of inheritance, there is nothing improbable in the transmis- sion of a habit to the offspring at an earlier age than that at which it was first acquired by the parents. From the foregoing remarks it seems probable that some actions, which were at first performed consciously, have become through habit and association converted into reflex actions, and are now so firmly fixed and in- herited, that they are performed, even when not of the least use, 14 as often as the same causes arise, which originally excited them in us through the volition. In such cases the sensory nerve-cells excite the motor cells, 13 Miiller remarks (' Elements of Physiology,' Eng. tr. vol. ii. p. 1311) on staiting being always accompanied by the closure of the eyelids. 14 Dr. Maud.slcy remarks ('Body and Mind,' p. 10) that "reflex movements which commonly effect a useful end may, under the changed circumstances of disease, do great mischief, becoming even the occasion of violent suffering and of a most painful death." 40 THE PRINCIPLE OF Chap. I. without first communicating with those cells on which our consciousness and volition depend. It is probable that sneezing and coughing were originally acquired by the habit of expelling, as violently as possible, any irri- tating particle from the sensitive air-passages. As far as time is concerned, there has been more than enough for these habits to have become innate or converted into reflex actions ; for they are common to most or all of the higher quadrupeds, and must therefore have been first acquired at a very remote period. Why the act of clearing the throat is not a reflex action, and has to be learnt by our children, I cannot pretend to say ; but we can see why blowing the nose on a handkerchief has to be learnt. It is scarcely credible that the movements of a headless frog, when it wipes off a drop of acid or other object from its thigh, and which movements are so well co-ordinated for a special purpose, were not at first per- formed voluntarily, being afterwards rendered easy through long-continued habit so as at last to be per- formed unconsciously, or independently of the cerebral hemispheres. So again it appears probable that starting was originally acquired by the habit of jumping aw r ay as quickly as possible from danger, whenever any of our senses gave us warning. Starting, as we have seen, is accompanied by the blinking of the eyelids so as to protect the eyes, the most tender and sensitive organs of the body ; and it is, I believe, always accompanied by a sudden and forcible inspiration, which is the natural preparation for any violent effort. But when a man or horse starts, his heart beats wildly against his ribs, and here it may be truly said we have an organ which has never been under the control of the will, partaking in the general reflex movements of Chap. I. SERVICEABLE ASSOCIATED HABITS. 41 the body. To this point, however, 1 shall return in a future chapter. The contraction of the iris, when the retina is stimu- lated by a bright light, is another instance of a move- ment, which it appears cannot possibly have been at first voluntarily performed and then fixed by habit ; for the iris is not known to be under the conscious control of the will in any animal. In such cases some explanation, quite distinct from habit, will have to be discovered. The radiation of nerve-force from strongly-excited nerve-cells to other connected cells, as in the case of a bright light on the retina causing a sneeze, may perhaps aid us in understanding how some reflex actions originated. A radiation of nerve- force of this kind, if it caused a movement tending to lessen the primary irritation, as in the case of the con- traction of the iris preventing too much light from falling on the retina, might afterwards have been taken advantage of and modified for this special purpose. It further deserves notice that reflex actions are in all probability liable to slight variations, as are all corporeal structures and instincts ; and any variations which were beneficial and of sufficient importance, would tend to be preserved and inherited. Thus reflex actions, when once gained for one purpose, might afterwards be modifie I independently of the will or habit, so as to serve for some distinct purpose. Such cases would be parallel with those which, as Ave have every reason to believe, have occurred with many instincts ; for although some instincts have been de- veloped simply through long-continued and inherited habit, other highly complex ones have been developed through the preservation of variations of pre-existing instincts — that is, through natural selection. I have discussed at some little length, though as I 3 • • 42 THE PRINCIPLE OF Chap. L am well aware, in a very imperfect manner, the acquire- ment of reflex actions, because they are often brought into play in connection with movements expressive of our emotions ; and it was necessary to show that at least some of them might have been first acquired through the will in order to satisfy a desire, or to relieve a disagreeable sensation. Associated habitual movements in the lower animals. — I have already given in the case of Man several instances of movements, associated with various states of the mind or body, which are now purposeless, but which were originally of use, and are still of use under certain circumstances. As this subject is very impor- tant for us, I will here give a considerable number of analogous facts, with reference to animals ; although many of them are of a very trifling nature. My ob- ject is to show that certain movements were origi- nally performed for a definite end, and that, under nearly the same circumstances, they are still pertina- ciously perform e 1 through habit when not of the least use. That the tendency in most of the following cases is inherited, we may infer from such actions being performed in the same manner by all the individuals, young and old, of the same species. We shall also see that they are excited by the most diversified, often circuitous, and sometimes mistaken associations. Dogs, when they wish to go to sleep on a carpet or other hard surface, generally turn round and round and scratch the ground with their fore-paws in a sense- less manner, as if they intended to trample down the grass and scoop out a hollow, as no doubt their wild parents did, when they lived on open grassy plains or in the woods. Jackals, fennecs, and other allied animals in the Zoological Gardens, treat their straw in Chap. L SERVICEABLE ASSOCIATED HABITS. 43 this manner; but it is a rather odd circumstance that the keepers, after observing for some months, have never seen the wolves thus behave. A semi- idiotic dog — and an animal in this condition would be particu- larly liable to follow a senseless habit — was observed by a friend to turn completely round on a carpet thirteen times before going to sleep.* Many carnivorous animals, as they crawl towards their prey and prepare to rush or spring on it, lower their heads and crouch, partly, as it would appear, to hide themselves, and partly to get ready for their rush ; and this habit in an exaggerated form has become here- . clitary in our pointers and setters. Now I have noticed scores of times that when two strange dogs meet on an open road, the one which first sees the other, though at the distance of one or two hundred yaids, after the first glance always lowers its head, generally crouches a little, or even lies down ; that is, he takes the proper attitude for concealing himself and for making a rush or spring, although the road is quite open and the distance great. Again, dogs of all kinds when intently watching and slowly approaching their prey, frequently keep one of their fore-legs doubled up for a long time, ready for the next cautious step; and this is eminently cha- racteristic of the pointer. But from habit they be- have in exactly the same manner whenever their attention is aroused (fig. 4). I have seen a dog at the foot of a high wall, listening attentively to a sound on the opposite side, with one leg doubled up ; Fig. 4. Small dog watching a cat on a table. From a photograph iakeu by Mr. llejlander. 44 THE PKINCIPLE OF Chap. L and in this case there could have been no intention of making a cautious approach. Dogs after voiding their excrement often make with all four feet a few scratches backwards, even on a bare stone pavement, as if for the purpose of covering up their excrement with earth, in nearly the same manner as do cats. Wolv«es and jackals behave in the Zoo- logical Gardens in exactly the same manner, yet, as I am assured by the keepers, neither wolves, jackals, nor foxes, when they have the means of doing so, ever cover up their excrement, any more than do dogs. All these animals, however, bury superfluous food. Hence, if we rightly understand the meaning of the above cat-like habit, of which there can be little doubt, we have a purposeless remnant of an habitual movement, which was originally followed by some remote progenitor of the dog-genus for a definite purpose, and which has been retained for a prodigious length of time. Dogs and jackals 15 take much pleasure in rolling and rubbing their necks and backs on carrion. The odour seems delightful to them, though dogs at least do not eat carrion. Mr. Bartlett has observed wolves for me, and has given them carrion, but has never seen them roll on it. I have heard it remarked, and I believe it to be true, that the larger dogs, which are probably descended from wolves, do not so often roll in carrion as do smaller dogs, which are probably descended from jackals. When a piece of brown biscuit is offered to a terrier of mine and she is not hungry (and I have heard of similar instances), she first tosses it about and worries it, as if it were a rat or other prey ; she then repeatedly rolls on it precisely as if it were a piece of 15 See Mr. F. H. Salvin's account of a tame jackal in ' Land and Water,' October, 1869. Chap. L SERVICEABLE ASSOCIATED HABITS. 45 carrion, and at last eats it. It would appear that an imaginary relish has to be given to the distasteful morsel ; and to effect this the dog acts in his habitual manner, as if the biscuit was a live animal or smelt like carrion, though he knows better than we do that this is not the case. I have seen this same terrier act in the same manner after killing a little bird or mouse. Dogs scratch themselves by a rapid movement of one of their hind feet; and when their backs are rubbed with a stick, so strong is the habit, that they cannot help rapidly scratching the air or the ground in a use- less and ludicrous manner. The terrier just alluded to, when thus scratched with a stick, will sometimes show her delight by another habitual movement, namely, by licking the air as if it were my hand. Horses scratch themselves by nibbling those parts of their bodies which they can reach with their teeth; but more commonly one horse shows another where he wants to be scratched, and they then nibble each other. A friend whose attention I had called to the subject, observed that when he rubbed his horse's neck, the animal protruded his head, uncovered his teeth, and moved his jaws, exactly as if nibbling another horse's neck, for he could never have nibbled his own neck. If a hor?e is much tickled, as when curry-combed, his wish to bite something becomes so intolerably strong, that he will clatter his teeth together, and though not vicious, bite his groom. At the same time from habit he closely depresses his ears, so as to protect them from being bitten, as if ho were fighting with another horse. A horse when eager to start on a journey makes the nearest approach which he can to the habitual move- ment of progression by pawing the ground. Now when horses in their stalls are about to be fed and are eager for their corn, they paw the pavement or the straw. 4G THE PRINCIPLE OF Chap. I. Two of my horses thus behave when they see or hear the corn given to their neighbours. But here we have what may almost be called a true expression, as pawing the ground is universally recognized as a sign of eagerness. Cats cover up their excrements of both kinds with earth; and my grandfather 16 saw a kitten scraping ashes over a spoonful of pure water spilt on the hearth ; so that here an habitual or instinctive action was falsely excited, not by a previous act or by odour, but by eyesight. It is well known that cats dislike wetting their feet, owing, it is probable, to their having aboriginally inha- bited the dry country of Egypt; and when they wet their feet they shake them violently. My daughter poured some water into a glass close to the head of a kitten; and it immediately shook its feet in the usual manner ; so that here we have an habitual movement falsely excited by an associated sound instead of by the sense of touch. Kittens, puppies, young pigs and probably many other young animals, alternately push with their fore-feet against the mammary glands of their mothers, to excite a freer secretion of milk, or to make it flow. Now it is very common with young cats, and not at all rare with old cats of the common an 1 Persian breeds (believed by some naturalists to be specifically ex- tinct), when comfortably lying on a warm shawl or other soft substance, to pound it quietly and alternately with their fore-feet ; their toes being spread out and claws slightly protruded, precisely as when sucking their mother. That it is the same movement is clearly shown by their often at the same time taking a bit of 16 Dr. Darwin, ' Zoonomia,' 1794, vol. i. p. 160. I find that the fact of cats protruding their feet when pleased is also noticed (p. 151) in this work. Chap. I. SERVICEABLE ASSOCIATED HABITS. 47 the shawl into their mouths and sucking it ; generally- closing their eyes and purring from delight. This curious movement is commonly excited only in associa- tion with the sensation of a warm soft surface ; but I have seen an old cat, when pleased by having its back scratched, pounding the air with its feet in the same manner ; so that this action has almost become the expression of a pleasurable sensation. Having referred to the act of sucking, I may add that this complex movement, as well as the alternate protrusion of the fore-feet, are reflex actions; for they are performed if a finger moistened with milk is place I in the mouth of a puppy, the front part of whose brain has been removed. 17 It has recently been stated in France, that the action of sucking is excited solely through the sense of smell, so that if the olfactory nerves of a puppy are destroyed, it never sucks. In like manner the wonderful power which a chicken possesses only a few hours after being hatched, of picking up small particles of foorl, seems to be started into action through the sense of hearing; for with chickens hatched by artificial heat, a good observer found that " making a noise with the finger-nail against " a board, in imitation of the hen-mother, first taught " them to peck at their meat." 18 I will give only one other instance of an habitual and purposeless movement. The Sheldrake (Tadorna) feeds on the sands left uncovered by the tide, and when a worm-cast is discovered, " it begins patting the "ground with its feet, dancing as it were, over the "hole;" and this makes the worm come to the surface. Now Mr. St. John says, that when his tame Sheldrakes 17 Carpenter, 'Principles of Comparative Physiology,' 1854, p. COO and Mailer's ' EL m< nts of Physiology,' Eng. translat. vol. ii. p. 03G. 19 Mowbniy on ' Poultry,' Gth edit. 18o0, p. 54. 48 THE PRINCIPLE OF Chap. I. *' came to ask for food, they patted the ground in an " impatient and rapid manner." 19 This therefore may almost be considered as their expression of hun- ger. Mr. Bartlett informs me that the Flamingo and the Kagu (Bhinochetus juhatus) when anxious to be fed, beat the ground with their feet in the same odd manner. So again Kingfishers, when they catch a fish, always beat it until it is killed ; and in the Zoo- logical Gardens they always beat the raw meat, with which they are sometimes fed, before devouring it. We have now, I think, sufficiently shown the truth of our first Principle, namely, that when any sensation, desire, dislike, &c, has led during a long series of generations to some voluntary movement, then a ten- dency to the performance of a similar movement will almost certainly be excited, whenever the same, or any analogous or associated sensation &c, although very weak, is experienced ; notwithstanding that the move- ment in this case may not be of the least use. Such habitual movements are often, or generally inherited ; and they then differ but little from reflex actions. When we treat of the special expressions of man, the latter part of our first Principle, as given at the com- mencement of this chapter, will be seen to hold good ; namely, that when movements, associated through habit with certain states of the mind, are partially repressed by the will, the strictly involuntary muscles, as well as those which are least under the separate control of the will, are liable still to act; and their action is often highly expressive. Conversely, when the will is tempo- rarily or permanently weakened, the voluntary muscles 19 See the account given by this excellent observer in * Wild Sports of the Highlands,' 1846, p. 142. Chap. I. SERVICEABLE ASSOCIATED HABITS. 49 fail before the involuntary. It is a fact familiar to pa- thologists, as Sir C. Bell remarks, 20 " that when de- " bility arises from affection of the brain, the influence " is greatest on those muscles which are, in their natural " condition, most under the command of the will." We shall, also, in our future chapters, consider another proposition included in our first Principle ; namely, that the checking of one habitual movement sometimes requires other slight movements; these latter serving as a means of expression. 'Philosophical Translations,' 1823; p. 182. CHAPTER II. General Principles of Expression — continued. The Principle of Antithesis — Instances in the dog and cat — Origin of the principle — Conventional signs — The principle of anti- thesis has not arisen •from opposite actions being consciously performed under opposite impulses. We will now consider our second Principle, that of Antithesis Certain states of tne mind lead, as we have seen in the last chapter, to certain habitual move- ments which were primarily, or may still be, of service ; and we shall find that when a directly opposite state of mind is induced, there is a strong and involuntary tendency to the performance of movements of a directly opposite nature, though these have never been of any service. A few striking instances of antithesis will be given, when we treat of the special expressions of man ; but as, in these cases, we are particularly liable to confound conventional or artificial gestures and ex- pressions with those which are innate or universal, and which alone deserve to rank as tiue expressions, I will in the present chapter almost confine myself to the lower animals. When a dog approaches a strange dog or man in a savage or hostile frame of mind he walks upright and very stiffly; his head is slightly raised, or not much lowered ; the tail is held erect and quite rigid ; the hairs bristle, especially along the neck and back; the pricked ears are directed forwards, and the eyes have a fixed stare : (see figs. 5 and 7). These actions, as will hereafter be explained, follow from the dog's Chap. II. THE PRINCIPLE OF ANTITHESIS. 51 intention to attack his enemy, and are thus to a large extent intelligible. As he prepares to spring with a savage growl on his enemy, the canine teeth are uncovered, and the ears are pressed close back- wards on the head ; but with these latter actions, we are not here concerned. Let us now suppose that the dog suddenly discovers that the man whom he is approaching, is not a stranger, but his master ; and let it be observed how completely and instantaneously his whole bearing is reversed. Instead of walking upright, the body sinks downwards or even crouches, and is thrown into flexuous movements ; his tail, instead of being held stiff and upright, is lowered and wagged from side to side ; his hair instantly becomes smooth ; his ears are depressed and drawn backwards, but not closely to the head; and his lips hang loosely. From the drawing back of the ears, the eyelids become elongated, and the eyes no longer appear round and staring. It should be added that the animal is at such times in an excited condition from joy ; and nerve-force will be generate 1 in excess, which naturally leads to action of some kind. Not one of the above movements, so clearly expressive of affection, are of the least direct service to the animal. They are explicable, as far as I can see, solely from being in complete opposition or antithesis to the attitude and movements which, from intelligible causes, are assumed when a dog intends to fight, and which consequently are expressive of anger. I request the reader to look at the four accompanying sketches, which have been given in order to recall vividly the appearance of a dog under these two states of mind. It is, however, not a little difficult to represent affection in a dog, whilst caressing his master and wagging his tail, as the essence of the expression lies in the con- tinuous flexuous movements. 54 THE PRINCIPLE OF ANTITHESIS. Chap. II. ClIAP. II. THE PRINCIPLE OF ANTITHESIS. 55 Fig. 8. The same caressing bis master. By Mr. A. May. 56 THE PRINCIPLE OF ANTITHESIS. Chap. II. We will now turn to the cat. When this animal is threatened by a dog, it arches its back in a surprising manner, erects its hair, opens its mouth and spits. But we are not here concerned with this well-known attitude, expressive, of terror combined with anger ; we are concerned only with that of rage or anger. This is not often seen, but may be observed when two cats are fighting together; and I have seen it well exhibited by a savage cat whilst plagued by a boy The attitude is almost exactly the same as that of a tiger disturbed and growling over its food, which every one must have beheld in menageries. The animal assumes a crouching position, with the body extended ; and the whole tail, or . the tip alone, is lashed or curled from side to side. The hair is not in the least erect. Thus far, the attitude and move- ments are nearly the same as when the animal is prepared to spring on its prey, and when, no doubt, it feels savage. But when preparing to fight, there is . this * difference, that the ears are closely pressed backwards ; the mouth is partially opened, showing the teeth ; the fore feet are occasionally struck out with protruded claws ; and the animal occasionally utters a fierce growl. (See figs. 9 and 10.) All, or almost all, these actions naturally follow (as hereafter to be explained), from the cat's manner and intention of attacking its enemy. Let us now look at a cat in a directly opposite frame of mind, whilst feeling affectionate and caressing her master ; and mark how opposite is her attitude in every respect. She now stands upright with her back slightly arched, which makes the hair appear rather rough, but it does net bristle ; her tail, instead of being extended and lashed from side to side, is held quite stiff and perpendicularly upwards; her ears are erect Chap.. II. THE PRINCIPLE OF ANTITHESIS. 57 and pointed; her mouth is closed ; and she rubs against her master with a purr instead of a growl. Let it further be observed how widely different is the whole bearing of an affectionate cat from that of a dog, when with his body crouching and flexuous, his tail lowered and wagging, and ears depressed, he caresses his master. This contrast in the attitudes and movements of these two carnivorous animals, under the same pleased and affectionate frame of mind, can be explained, as it appears to me, solely by their movements standing in complete antithesis to those which are naturally assumed, when these animals feel savage and are prepared either to fight or to seize their prey. In these cases of the dog and cat, there is every reason to believe that the gestures both of hostility and affection are innate or inherited ; for they are almost identically the same in the different races of the spe- cies, and in all the individuals of the same race, both young and old. I will here give one other instance of antithesis in ex- pression. I formerly possessed a large dog, who, like every other dog, was much pleased to go out walking. He showed his pleasure by trotting gravely before me with high steps, head much raised, moderately erected ears, and tail carried aloft but not stiffly. Not far from my house a path branches off to the right, leading to the hot-house, which I used often to visit for -a few moments, to look at my experimental plants. This was always a great disappointment to the dog, as he did not know whether I should continue my walk ; and the in- stantaneous and complete change of expression which came over him, as soon as my body swerved in the least towards the path (and I sometimes tried this as an experiment) was laughable. His look of dejection was known to every member of the family, and was called 58 THE PRINCIPLE OF ANTITHESIS. Chap. II. Fig. 10. Cat in an affectionate frame of mind, by Mr. Wood. 60 THE PRINCIPLE OF ANTITHESIS. Chap. II. his hot-house face. This consisted in the head drooping much, the whole body sinking a little and remaining motionless ; the ears and tail falling suddenly clown, but the tail was by no means wagged. With the fall ng of the ears and of his great chaps, the eyes became much changed in appearance, and I fancied that they looked less bright. His aspect was that of piteous, hopeless dejection ; and it was, as I have said, laughable, as the cause was so slight. Every detail in his attitude was in complete opposition to his former joyful yet dignified bearing; and can be explained, as it appears to me, in no other way, except through the principle of antithesis. Had not the change been so instantaneous, I should have attributed it to his lowered spirits affecting, as in the case of man, the nervous system and circulation, and consequently the tone of his whole muscular frame ; and this may have been in part the cause. We will now consider how the principle of antithesis in expression has arisen. With social animals, the power of intercommunication between the members of the same community, — and with other species, between the opposite sexes, as well as between the young and the old, — is of the highest importance to them. This is generally effected by means of the voice, but it is certain that gestures and expressions are to a certain extent mutually intelligible. Man not only uses in- articulate cries, gestures, and expressions, but has invented articulate language ; if, indeed, the word invented can be applied to a process, completed by innumerable steps, half-consciously made. Any one who has watched monkeys will not doubt that they perfectly understand each other's gestures and ex- pression, and to a large extent, as Rengger Chap. II. THE PRINCIPLE OF ANTITHESIS. 61 asserts, 1 those of man. An animal when going to attack another, or when afraid of another, often makes itself appear terrible, by erecting its hair, thus increasing the apparent bulk of its body, by showing its teeth, or brandishing its horns, or by uttering fierce sounds. As the power of intercommunication is certainly of high service to many animals, there is no a priori im- probability in the supposition, that gestures manifestly of an opposite nature to those by which certain feelings are already expressed, should at first have been volun- tarily employed under the influence of an opposite state of feeling. The fact of the gestures being now innate, would be no valid objection to the belief that they were at first intentional ; for if practised during many generations, they would probably at last be inherited. Nevertheless it is more than doubtful, as we shall imme- diately see, whether any of the cases which come under our present head of antithesis, have thus originated. With conventional signs which are not innate, such as those used by the deaf and dumb and by savages, the principle of opposition or antithesis has been par- tially brought into play. The Cistercian monks thought it sinful to speak, and as they could not avoid hob ling- some communication, they invented a gesture language, in which the principle of opposition seems to have been employed. 2 Dr. Scott, of the Exeter Deaf and Dumb Institution, writes to me that * opposites are greatly '•used in teaching the deaf and dumb, who have a lively " sense of them." Nevertheless I have been surprise d how few unequivocal instances can be adduced. This 1 ' Naturgesehichte der Saugethiere von Paraguay,' 1830, s. 55. 2 Mr. Tylor gives an account of the Cistercian gesture-language in bis 'Early History of Mankind' (2nd edit. 1870, p. 40), and makes some remarks on the principle of opposition in gestures. 62 THE PRINCIPLE OF ANTITHESIS. Chap. II. depends partly on all the signs having commonly had some natural origin ; and partly on the practice of* the deaf and dumb and of savages to contract their signs as much as possible for the sake of rapidity. 3 Hence their natural source or origin often becomes doubtful or is completely lost ; as is likewise the case with articulate language. Many signs, moreover, which plainly stand in oppo- sition to each other, appear to have had on both sides a significant origin. This seems to hold good with the signs used by the deaf and dumb for light and darkness, for strength and weakness, &c. In a future chapter I shall endeavour to show that the opposite gestures of affirmation and negation, namely, verti- cally nodding and laterally shaking the head, have both probably had a natural beginning. The waving of the hand from right to left, which is used as a negative by some savages, may have been invented in imitation of shaking the head ; but whether the opposite movement of waving the hand in a straight line from the face, which is used in affirmation, has arisen through anti- thesis or in some quite distinct manner, is doubtful. If we now turn to the gestures which are innate or common to all the individuals of the same species, and which come under the present head of antithesis, it is extremely doubtful, whether any of them were at first deliberately invented and consciously performed. With mankind the best instance of a gesture standing 3 See on this subject Dr. W. R. Scott's interesting work, ' The Deaf and Dumb/ 2nd edit. 1870, p. 12. He says, "This contracting of " natural gestures into much shorter gestures than the natural expres- " sion requires, is very common amongst the deaf and dumb. This " contracted gesture is frequently so shortened ns nearly to lose all " semblance of the natur.il one, but to the deaf and dumb who use it, " it still has the force of the original expression." Chap. II. THE PRINCIPLE OF ANTITHESIS. 63 in direct opposition to other movements, naturally assumed under an opposite frame of mind, is that of shrugging the shoulders. This expresses impotence or an apology, — something which cannot be done, or cannot be avoided. The gesture is sometimes used consciously and voluntarily, but it is extremely im- probable that it was at first deliberately invented, and afterwards fixed by habit ; for not only do young children sometimes shrug their shoulders under the above states of mind, but the movement is accompanied, as will be shown in a future chapter, by various subor- dinate movements, which not one man in a thousand is aware of, unless he has specially attended to the subject. Dogs when approaching a strange dog, may find it useful to show by their movements that they are friendly, and do not wish to fight. When two young dogs in play are growling and biting each other's faces and legs, it is obvious that they mutually understand each other's gestures and manners. There seems, indeed, some degree of instinctive knowledge in puppies and kittens, that they must not use their sharp little teeth or claws too freely in their play, though this sometimes happens and a squeal is the result ; otherwise they would often injure each other's eyes. When my terrier bites my hand in play, often snarling at the same time, if he bites too hard and I say gently, gently, he goes on biting, but answers me by a few wags of the tail, which seems to say " Never mind, it is all fun." Although dogs do thus express, and may wish to express, to other dogs and to man, that they are in a friendly state of mind, it is incredible that they could ever have deli- berately thought of drawing back and depressing their ears, instead of holding them erect, — of lowering and wagging their tails, instead of keeping them stiff and 64 THE PRINCIPLE OF ANTITHESIS. Ciiaj>. II upright, & All these signs of rage are probably in large part, and some of them appear to be wholly, due to the direct action of the excited sensorium. But animals of all kinds, and their progenitors before them, when attacked or threatened by an enemy, have exerted their utmost powers in fighting and in defending themselves. Unless an animal does thus act, or has the intention, or at least the desire, to attack its enemy, it cannot pro- perly be said to be enraged. An inherited habit of muscular exertion will thus have been gained in asso- ciation with rage ; and this will directly or indirectly affect various organs, in nearly the same manner as does great bodily suffering. The heart no doubt will likewise be affected in a direct 9 I am much indebted to Mr. A. H. Garrod for having informed me of M. Lorain's work on the pulse, in which a sphygmogiam of a woman in a rage is given ; and this shows much difference in the rate and other characters from that of the same woman in her ordinary state. Chap. III. ACTION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM. 75 manner ; but it will also in all probability be affected through habit; and all the more so from not being under the control of the will. We know that any great exertion which we voluntarily make, affects the heart, * through mechanical and other principles which need not here be considered; and it was shown in the first chapter that nerve-force flows readily through habitu- ally used channels, — through the nerves of volun- tary or involuntary movement, and through those of sensation. Thus even a moderate amount of exertion will tend to act on the heart; and on the principle of association, of which so many instances have been given, we may feel nearly sure that any sensation or emotion, as great pain or rage, which has habitually led to much muscular action, will immediately influence the flow of nerve-force to the heart, although there may not be at the time any muscular exertion. The heart, as I have said, will be all the more readily affected through habitual associations, as it is not under the control of the will. A man when moderately angry, or even when enraged, may command the movements of his body, but he cannot prevent his heart from beating rapidly. His chest will perhaps give a few heaves, and his nostrils just quiver, for the movements of respiration are only in part voluntary. In like manner those muscles of the face which are least obedient to the will, will sometimes alone betray a slight and passing emo- tion. The glands again are wholly independent of the will, and a man suffering from grief may command his features, but cannot always prevent the tears from coming into his eyes. A hungry man, if tempting food is placed before him, may not show his hunger by any outward gesture, but he cannot check the secretion of saliva. Under a transport of Joy or of vivid Pleasure, there is a 76 THE PRINCIPLE OF THE DIRECT Chap. III. strong tendency to various purposeless movements, and to the utterance of various sounds. We see this in our young children, in their loud laughter, clapping of hands, and jumping for joy ; in the bounding and barking of a dog when going out to walk with his master ; and in the frisking of a horse when turned out into an open field. Joy quickens the circulation, and this stimulates the brain, which again reacts on the whole body. The above purposeless movements and increased heart-action may be attributed in chief part to the excited state of the sensorium, 10 and to the consequent undirected over- flow, as Mr. Herbert Spencer insists, of nerve-force. It deserves notice, that it is chiefly the anticipation of a pleasure, and not its actual enjoyment, which leads to purposeless and extravagant movements of the body, and to the utterance of various sounds. We see this in our children when they expect any great pleasure or treat ; and dogs, which have been bounding about at the sight of a plate of food, when they get it do not show their delight by any outward sign, not even by wagging their tails. Now with animals of all kinds, the acquirement of almost all their pleasures, with the 10 How powerfully intense joy excites the brain, and how the brain reacts on the body, is we ll shown in the rare cases of Psychical Intoxica- tion. Dr. J. Crichton Browne (' Medical Mirror,' 1865) records the case of a young man of strongly nervous temperament, who, on hearing by a telegram that a fortune had been bequeathed him, first became pale, then exhilarated, and soon in the highest spirits, but flushed and very restless. He then took a walk "with a friend for the sake of tranquil- lising himself, but returned staggering in his gait, uproariously laugh- ing, yet irritable in temper, incessantly talking, and singing loudly in the public streets It was positively ascertained that he had not touched, any spirituous liquor, though every one thought that he was intoxicated. Vomiting after a time came on, and the half-digested contents of his stomach were examined, but no odour of alcohol could be elett cted. He then slept heavily, and on awaking was well, except that he suffered from headache, nausea, and prostration of strength. Chap. III. ACTION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM. 77 exception of those of warmth and rest, are associated, and have long been associated with active movements, as in the hunting or search for food, and in their courtship. Moreover, the mere exertion of the muscles after long rest or confinement is in itself a pleasure, as we ourselves feel, and as we see in the play of young animals. Therefore on this latter principle alone we might perhaps expect, that vivid pleasure would be apt to show itself conversely in muscular movements. With all or almost all animals, even with birds, Terror causes the body to tremble. The skin becomes pale, sweat breaks out, and the hair bristles. The secretions of the alimentary canal and of the kidneys are increased, and they are involuntarily voided, owing to the relaxation of the sphincter muscles, as is known to be the case with man, and as I have seen with cattle, dogs, cats, and monkeys. The breathing is harried. The heart beats quickly, wildly, and violently ; but whether it pumps the blood more efficiently through the body may be doubted, for the surface seems bloodless and the strength of the muscles soon fails. In a frightened horse I have felt through the saddle the beating of the heart so plainly that I could have counted the beats. The mental faculties are much disturbed. Utter prostration soon follows, and even fainting. A terrified canary-bird has been seen not only to tremble and to turn white about the base of the bill, but to faint; 11 and I once caught a robin in a room, which fainted so completely, that for a time I thought it dead. Most of these symptoms are probably the direct result, independently of habit, of the disturbed state of the sensorium ; but it is doubtful whether they ought to be wholly thus accounted for. When an animal is alarmed 11 Dr. Darwin, ' Zoonomia,' 1794, vol. i. p. 148. 78 THE PKINCIPLE OF THE DIRECT Chap. III. it almost always stands motionless for a moment, in order to collect its senses and to ascertain the source of danger, and sometimes for the sake of escaping detection. Bat headlong flight soon follows, with no husbanding of the strength as in fighting, and the animal continues to fly as long as the danger lasts, until utter prostration, with failing respiration and circulation, with all the muscles quivering and profuse sweating, renders further flight impossible. Hence it does not seem improbable that the principle of asso- ciated habit may in part account for, or at least augment, some of the above-named characteristic symp- toms of extreme terror. That the principle of associated habit has played an important part in causing the movements expressive of the foregoing several strong emotions and sensations, we may, I think, conclude from considering firstly, some other strong emotions which do not ordinarily require for their relief or gratification any voluntary movement ; and secondly the contrast in nature between the so-called exciting and depressing states of the mind. No emotion is stronger than maternal love; but a mother may feel the deepest love for her helpless infant, and yet not show it by any outward sign; or only by slight caressing movements, with a gentle smile and tender eyes. But let any one intentionally injure her infant, and see what a change ! how she starts up with threatening aspect, how her eyes sparkle and her face reddens, how her bosom heaves, nostrils dilate, and heart beats; for anger, and not maternal love, has habitually led to action. The love between the opposite sexes is widely different from maternal love;, and when lovers meet, we know that their hearts beat quickly, their breathing is hurried, and their faces Chap. III. ACTION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM. 79 flush ; for this love is not inactive like that of a mother for her infant. A man may have his mind filled with the blackest hatred or suspicion, or be corroded with envy or jealousy; but as these feelings do not at once lead to action, and as they commonly last for some time, they are not shown by any outward sign, excepting that a man in this state assuredly does not appear cheerful or good-tempered. If indeed these feelings break out into overt acts, rage takes their place, and will be plainly exhibited. Painters can hardly portray suspicion, jealousy, envy, &c, except by the aid of accessories which tell the tale ; and poets use such vague and fanciful expres- sions as " green-eyed jealousy." Spenser describes suspicion as "Foul, ill-favoured, and grim, under his " eyebrows looking still askance," &c. ; Shakespeare speaks of envy "as lean-faced in her loathsome case;" and in another place he says, " no black envy shall " make my grave ;" and again as " above pale envy's " threatening reach." Emotions and sensations have often been classed. as exciting or depressing. When all the organs of the body and mind, — those of voluntary and involuntary movement, of perception, sensation, thought, &c, — perform their functions more energetically and rapidly than usual, a man or animal may be said to be excited, and, under an opposite state, to be depressed. Anger and joy are from the first exciting emotions, and they naturally lead, more especially the former, to energetic movements, which react on the heart and this again on the brain. A physician once remarked to me as a 1 proof of the exciting nature of anger, that a man when excessively jaded will sometimes invent imaginary offences and put himself into a passion, unconsciously for the sake of rein vigora ting himself; and since 80 THE PKINCIPLE OF THE DIEECT Chap. HI. hearing this remark, I have occasionally recognized its full truth. Several other states of mind appear to be at first exciting, but soon become depressing to an extreme degree. When a mother suddenly loses her child, sometimes she is frantic with grief, and must be con- sidered to be in an excited state; she walks wildly about, tears her hair or clothes, and wrings her hands. This latter action is perhaps clue to the principle of antithesis, betraying an inward sense of helplessness and that nothing can be done. The other wild and violent movements ma) r be in part explained by the relief experienced through muscular exertion, and in part by the undirected overflow of nerve-force from the excited sensorium. But under the sudden loss of a beloved person, one of the first and commonest thoughts which occurs, is that something more might have been done to save the lost one. An excellent observer, 12 in describing the behaviour of a girl at the sudden death of her father, says she " went about the house " wringing her hands like a creature demented, saying " 'It was her fault;' 'I should never have left him;' " 'If I had only sat up with him,' " &c. With such ideas vividly present before the mind, there would arise, through the principle of associated habit, the strongest tendency to energetic action of some kind. As soon as the sufferer is fully conscious that nothing can be done, despair or deep sorrow takes the place of frantic grief. The sufferer sits motionless, or gently rocks to and fro ; the circulation becomes languid ; respiration is almost forgotten, and deep sighs are drawn. All this reacts on the brain, and prostration soon follows with collapsed muscles and dulled eyes. As 12 Mrs. Olipbant, in her novel of ' MUs Majoriianks,' p. 362. Chap. III. ACTION OF THE NEKVOUS SYSTEM. 81 associated habit no longer prompts the sufferer to action, he is urged by his friends to voluntary exertion, and not to give way to silent, motionless grief. Exer- tion stimulates the heart, and this reacts on the brain, and aids the mind to bear its heavy load. Pain, if severe, soon induces extreme depression or prostration ; but it is at first a stimulant and excites to action, as we see when we whip a horse, and as is shown by the horrid tortures inflicted in foreign lands on ex- hausted dray- bullocks, to rouse them to renewed exertion. Fear again is the most depressing of all the emotions ; and it soon induces utter, helpless prostration, as if in consequence of, or in association with, the most violent and prolonged attempts to escape from the danger, though no such attempts have actually been made. Nevertheless, even extreme fear often acts at first as a powerful stimulant. A man or animal driven through terror to desperation, is endowed with wonderful strength, and is notoriously dangerous in the highest degree. On the whole we may conclude that the principle of the direct action of the sensorium on the body, due to the constitution of the nervous system, and from the first independent of the will, has been highly influential in determining many expressions. Good instances are afforded by the trembling of the muscles, the sweating of the skin, the modified secretions of the alimentary canal and glands, under various emotions and sensations. But actions of this kind are often combine 1 with others, which follow from our first principle, namely, that actions which have often been of direct or indirect service, under certain states of the mind, in order to gratify or relieve certain sensations, desires, &c, are still performed under analogous circumstances through mere habit although 82 ACTTON OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM. Chap. 111. of no service. We have combinations of this kind, at least in part, in the frantic gestures of rage and in the writhings of extreme pain ; and, perhaps, in the increased action of the heart and of the respiratory organs. Even when these and other emotions or sensations are aroused in a very feeble manner, there will still be a tendency to simi- lar actions, owing to the force of long-associated habit ; and those actions which are least under voluntary control will generally be longest retained. Our second principle of antithesis has likewise occasionally come into play. Finally, so many expressive movements can be ex- plained, as I trust will be seen in the course of this volume, through the three principles which have now been discussed, that we may hope hereafter to see all thus explained, or by closely analogous principles. It is, however, often impossible to decide how much weight ought to be attributed, in each particular case, to one of our principles, and how much to another ; and very many points in the theory of Expression remain inex- plicable. Ch\p. IV. MEANS OF EXPKESSION IN ANIMALS. 83 CHAPTER IY. Means of Expression in Animals. The emission of sounds — Vocal sounds — Sounds otherwise pro- duced — Erection of the dermal appendages, hairs, feathers, &c, under the emotions of anger and terror — The drawing back oi the ears as a preparation for fighting, and as an expression of anger — Erection of the ears and raising the head, a sign of attention. In this and the following chapter I will describe, but only in sufficient detail to illustrate my subject, the expressive movements, under different states of the mind, of some few well-known animals. But before considering them in due succession, it will save much useless repetition to discuss certain means of expression common to most of them. The emission of Sounds. — With many kinds of ani- mals, man included, the vocal organs are efficient in the highest degree as a means of expression. We have seen, in the last chapter, that when the sensorium is strongly excited, the muscles of the body are generally thrown into violent action ; and as a consequence, loud sounds are uttered, however silent the animal may generally be, and although the sounds may be of no use. Hares and rabbits for instance, never, I believe, use their vocal organs except in the extremity of suffering ; as, when a wounded hare is killed by the sportsman, or when a young rabbit is caught by a stoat. Cattle and horses suffer great pain in silence , but when this is excessive, and especially when asso- ciated with terror, they utter fearful sounds. I have 84 MEANS OF EXPKESSION Chap. IV. often recognized, from a distance on the Pampas, the agonized death-bellow of the cattle, when caught by the lasso and hamstrung. It is said that horses, when attacked by wolves, utter. loud and peculiar screams of distress. Involuntary and purposeless contractions of the muscles of the chest and glottis, excited in the above manner, may have first given rise to the emission of vocal sounds. But the voice is now largely used by many animals for various purposes ; and habit seems to have played an important part in its employment under other circumstances. Naturalists have remarked, I believe with truth, that social animals, from habitually using their vocal organs as a means of intercommunica- tion, use them on other occasions much more freely than other animals. But there are marked excep- tions to this rule, for instance, with the rabbit. The principle, also, of association, which is so widely extended in its power, has likewise played its part. Hence it follows that the voice, from having been habitually employed as a serviceable aid under certain conditions, inducing pleasure, pain, rage, &c, is commonly used whenever the same sensations or emotions are excited, under quite different conditions, or in a lesser degree. The sexes of many animals incessantly call for each other during the breeding-season ; and in not a few cases, the male endeavours thus to charm or excite the female. This, indeed, seems to have been the primeval use and means of development of the voice, as I have attempted to show in my * Descent of Man.' Thus the use of the vocal organs will have become associated with the anticipation of the strongest pleasure which animals are capable of feeling. Animals which live in society often call to each other when separated, and evidently feel much joy at meeting ; as we see with a Chap. IV. IN ANIMALS. 85 horse, on the return of his companion, for whom he has been neighing. The mother calls incessantly for bet lost young ones ; for instance, a cow for her calf ; and the young of many animals call for their mothers. When a flock of sheep is scattered, the ewes bleat incessantly for their lambs, and their mutual pleasure at coming together is manifest. Woe betide the man who meddles with the young of the larger and fiercer quadrupeds, if they hear the cry of distress from their young. Eage leads to the violent exertion of all the muscles, including those of the voice; and some animals, when enraged, endeavour to strike terror into their enemies by its power and harshness, as the lion does by roaring, and the dog by growling. I infer that their object is to strike terror, because the lion at the same time erects the hair of its mane, and the dog the hair along its back, and thus they make themselves appear as large and terrible as possible. Eival males try to excel and challenge each other by their voices, and this leads to deadly contests. Thus the use of the voice will have become associated with the emotion of anger, however it may be aroused. We have also seen that intense pain, like rage, leads to violent outcries, and the exertion of screaming by itself gives some relief; and thus the use of the voice will have become associated with suffering of any kind. The cause of widely different sounds being uttered under different emotions and sensations is a very obscure subject. Nor does the rule always hold good that there is any marked difference. For instance with the dog, the bark of anger and that of joy do not differ much, though they can be distinguished. It is not probable that any precise explanation of the cause or source of each particular sound, under different states of the mind, will ever be given. We know that 86 MEANS OF EXPRESSION Chap. IV. some animals, after being domesticated, have acquired the habit of uttering sounds which were not natural to them. 1 Thus domestic dogs, and even tamed jackals, have learnt to bark, which is a noise not proper to any species of the genus, with the exception of the Cants latrans of North America, which is said to bark. Some breeds, also, of the domestic pigeon have learnt to coo in a new and quite peculiar manner. The character of the human voice, under the in- fluence of various emotions, has been discussed by Mr. Herbert Spencer 2 in his interesting essay on Music. He clearly shows that the voice alters much under different conditions, in loudness and in quality, that is, in resonance and timbre, in pitch and intervals. No one can listen to an eloquent orator or preacher, or to a man calling angrily to another, or to one expressing astonishment, without being struck with the truth of Mr. Spencer's remarks. It is curious how early in life the modulation of the voice becomes ex- pressive. With one of my children, Tinder the age of two years, I clearly perceived that his humph of assent was rendered by a slight modulation strongly emphatic ; and that by a peculiar whine his negative expressed obstinate determination. Mr. Spencer further shows that emotional speech, in all the above respects is intimately related to vocal music, and consequently to instrumental music ; and he attempts to explain the characteristic qualities of both on physiological grounds, — namely, on " the general law that a feeling is a sti- " mulus to muscular action." It may be admitted that 1 See the evidence on this head in my ' Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication,' vol. i. p. 27. On the cooing of pigeons, vol. i. pp. 154, 155. 2 ' Essays, Scientific, Political, and Speculative,' 1858. ' The Origin and Function of Music,' p. 359. Chap. IV. IN ANIMALS. 87 the voice is affected through this law ; but the expla- nation appears to me too general and vague to throw much light on the various differences, with the excep- tion of that of loudness, between ordinary speech and emotional speech, or singing. This remark holds good, whether we believe that the various qualities of the voice originated in speaking under the excitement of strong feelings, and that these qualities have subsequently been transferred to vocal music ; or whether we believe, as I maintain, that the habit of uttering musical sounds was first developed, as a means of courtship, in the early progenitors of man, and thus became associated with the strongest emotions of which they were capable, — -namely, ardent love, rivalry and triumph. That animals utter musical notes is familiar to every one, as we may daily hear in the singing of birds. It is a more remarkable fact that an ape, one of the Gibbons, produces an exact octave of musical sounds, ascending and descending the scale by half-tones; so that this monkey "alone of brute mam- " mals may be said to sing." 3 From this fact, and from the analogy of other animals, I have been led to infer that the progenitors of man probably uttered musical tones, before they had acquired the power of articulate speech ; and that consequently, when the voice is used under any strong emotion, it tends to assume, through the principle of association, a musical character. We can plainly perceive, with some of the lower animals, that the males employ their voices to 3 ' The Descent of Man,' 1870, vol. ii. p. 332. The word3 quoted are from Professor Owen. It has lately been shown that some quadrupeds much lower in the scale than monkeys, namely Rodents, are able to pro- duce correct musical tones : see the account of a singing Ilesperomys, by the llev. S. Lockwood, in the ' American Naturalist,' vol. v. De- cember, 1871, p. 7G1. 88 MEAN'S OF EXPRESSION Chap. IV please the females, and that they themselves take pleasure in their own vocal utterances ; but why par- ticular sounds are uttered, and why these give pleasure cannot at present be explained. That the pitch of the voice bears some relation to certain states of feeling is tolerably clear. A person gently complaining of ill-treatment, or slightly suffer- ing, almost always speaks in a high-pitched voice. Dogs, when a little impatient, often make a high piping note through their noses, which at once strikes us as plaintive; 4 but how difficult it is to know whether the sound is essentially plaintive, or only appears so in this particular case, from our having learnt by experience what it means ! Ilengger, states 5 that the monkeys (Cebus azarae), ^which he kept in Paraguay, expressed astonishment by a half-piping, half-snarling noise ; anger or impatience, by repeating the sound hu hu in a deeper, grunting voice ; and fright or pain, by shrill screams. On the other hand, with mankind, deep groans and high piercing screams equally express an agony of pain. Laughter may be either high or low ; so that, with adult men, as Haller long ago remarked, 6 the sound partakes of the character of the vowels (as pronounced in German) and A; whilst with children and women, it has more of the character of E and I ; and these latter vowel-sounds naturally have, as Ilelmholtz has shown, a higher -pitch than the former ; yet both tones of laughter equally express enjoyment or amusement. In considering the mode in whi :*h vocal utterances express emotion, we are naturally led to inquire into 4 Mr. Tylor ('Primitive Culture,' 1871, vol. i. p. 166), in Ids discus- sion on this subject, alludes t;> the whining of the dog. 5 ' Naturgeschichte der Saugethiere von Paraguay,' 1830, s. 46. e Quoted by Gratiolet, ' De la Physionomie,' 1865, p. 115. Chap. IV. IN ANIMALS. 89 the cause of what is called " expression " in music. Upon this point Mr. Litchfield, who has long attended to the subject of music, has been so kind as to give me the following remarks : — r* The question, what is the "essence of musical 'expression' involves a number " of obscure points, which, so far as I am aware, are as " yet unsolved enigmas. Up to a certain point, how- " ever, any law which is found to hold as to the expres- * sion of the emotions by simple sounds must apply to " the more developed mode of expression in song, \\hich " may be taken as the primary type of all music. A " great part of the emotional effect of a song depends " on the character of the action by which the sounds " are produced. In songs, for instance, which express " great vehemence of passion, the effect often chiefly " depends on the forcible utterance of some one or two " characteristic passages which demand great exertion " of vocal force ; and it will be frequently noticed that u a song of this character fails of its proper effect when " sung by a voice of sufficient power and range to give " the characteristic passages without much exertion. " This is, no doubt, the secret of the loss of effect so " often produced by the transposition of a song from " one key to another. The effect is thus seen to depend " not merely on the actual sounds, but also in part on " the nature of the action which produces the sounds. " Indeed it is obvious that whenever we feel the ' ex- t edition of my ' Origin of Species.' Since the passages in the text above have bucu printed, 1 have been pleased to find that Mr. Henderson ('The American Naturalist/ May, 1872, p. 2G0) also takes a similar view of the use of the rattle, namely " in preventing an 4 - attack from being made." 4 J 10 MEANS OF EXPRESSION Chap. IV. been specially developed to serve as an efficient sound- producing instrument, there can hardly be a doubt ; for even the vertebrae included within the extremity of the tail have been altered in shape and cohere. But there is no greater improbability in various structures, such as the rattle of the rattle-snake, — the lateral scales of the Echis, — the neck with the included ribs of the Cobra, — and the whole body of the puff-adder, — having been modified for the sake of warning and frightening away their enemies, than in a bird, namely, the won- derful Secretary-hawk (Gijpogeranus) having had its whole frame modified for the sake of killing snakes with impunity. It is highly probable, judging from what we have before seen, that this bird would ruffle its feathers whenever it attacked a snake ; and it is certain that the Herpestes, when it eagerly rushes to attack a snake, erects the hair all over its body, and especially that on its tail. 32 We have also seen that some porcupines, when angered or alarmed at the sight of a snake, rapidly vibrate their tails, thus producing a peculiar sound by the striking together of the hollow quills. So that here both the attackers and the at- tacked endeavour to make themselves as dreadful as possible to each other ; and both possess for this purpose specialised means, which, oddly enough, are nearly the same in some of these cases. Finally we can see that if, on the one hand, those individual snakes, whicE were best able to frighten away their enemies, escaped best from being devoured ; and if, on the other hand, those individuals of the attacking enemy survived in larger numbers which were the best fitted for the dangerous task of killing and devouring venomous snakes; — then in the one case as in the other, bene- 3 2 Mr. des Vceux, in Troc. Zool. Soc. 1871, p. 3. Chap. IV. IN ANIMALS. Ill ficial variations, supposing the characters in question to vary, would commonly have been preserved through the survival of the fittest. The Drawing bacJc and pressure of the Ears to the Head. — The ears through their movements are highly expressive in many animals ; but in some, such as man, the higher apes, and many ruminants, they fail in this respect. A slight difference in position serves to express in the plainest manner a different state of mind, as we may daily see in the dog; but we are here concerned only with the ears being drawn closely backwards and pressed to the head. A savage frame of mind is thus shown, but only in the case of those animals which fight with their teeth; and the care which they take to prevent their ears being seized by their antagonists, accounts for this position. Conse- quently, through habit and association, whenever they feel slightly savage, or pretend in their play to be savage, their ears are drawn back. That this is the true explanation may be inferred from the relation which exists in very many animals between their manner of fighting and the retraction of their ears. All the Carnivora fight with their canine teeth, and all, as far as I have observed, draw their ears back when feeling savage. This may be continually seen with dogs when fighting in earnest, and with puppies fighting in play. The movement is different from the falling down and slight drawing back of the ears, when a dog feels pleased and is caressed by his master. The retraction of the ears may likewise be seen in kittens fighting together in their play, and in full- grown cats when really savage, as before illustrated in fig. 9 (p. 58). Although their ears are thus to a large extent protected, yet they often get much torn in old 112 MEANS OF EXPRESSION Chap. IV. male cats during their mutual battles. The same movement is very striking in tigers, leopards, &c., whilst growling over their food in menageries. The lynx has remarkably long ears; and their retraction, when one of these animals is approached in its cage, is very conspicuous, and is eminently expressive of its savage disposition. Even one of the Eared Seals, the Otaria pusilla, which has very small ears, draws them backwards, when it makes a savage rush at the legs of its keeper. When horses fight together they use their incisors for biting, an 1 their fore-legs for striking, much more than they do their hind-legs for kicking backwards. This lias been observed when stallions have broken loose and have fought together, and may likewise be inferred from the kind of wounds which they inflict on each other. Every one recognises the vicious appear- ance which the drawing back of the ears gives to a horse. This movement is very different from that of listening to a sound behind. If an ill-tempered horse in a stall is inclined to kick backwards, his ears are retracted from habit, though he has no intention or power to bite. But when a horse throws up both hind- legs in play, as when entering an open field, or when just touched by the whip, he does not generally depress his ears, for he does not then feel vicious. Guanacoes fight savagely with their teeth ; and they must do so frequently, for I found the hides of several which I shot in Patagonia deeply scored.- So do camels; and both these animals, when savage, draw their ears closely backwards. Guanacoes, as I have noticed, when not intending to bite, but merely to spit their offensive saliva from a distance at an intruder, retract their ears. Even the hippopotamus, when threatening with its widely-open enormous mouth a comrade, draws back its small ears, just like a horse. Chap. IV. IN ANIMALS. 113 Now what a contrast is presented between the foregoing animals and cattle, sheep, or goats, which never use their teeth in fighting, and never draw back their ears when enraged ! Although sheep and goats appear such placid animals, the males often join in furious contests. As deer form a closely related family, and as I did not know that they ever fought with their teeth, I was much surprised at the account given by Major Ross King of the Moose-deer in Canada. He says, when "two males chance to meet, laying back their ears and gnashing their teeth together, they "rush at each other with appalling fury:' 33 But Mr. Bartlett informs me that some species of deer fight savagely with their teeth, so that the drawing back of the ears by the moose accords with our rule. Several kinds of kangaroos, kept in the Zoological Gardens, fight by scratching with their fore-feet and by kicking with their hind-legs; but they never bite each other, an I the keepers have never seen them draw back their ears when angered. Rabbits fight chiefly by kicking and scratching, but they likewise bite each other ; and I have known one to bite off half the tail of its antagonist. At the commencement of their battles they lay back their ears, but afterwards, as they bound over and kick each other, they keep their ears erect, or move them much about. Mr. Bartlett watched a wild boar quarrelling rather savagely with his sow ; and both had their mouths open and their ears drawn backwards. But this does not appear to be a common action with domestic pigs when quarrelling. Boars fight together by striking upwards with their tusks; and Mr. Bartlett doubts whether they then draw back their ears. Elephants, which in 83 ' The Sportsman and Naturalist in Canada.' 18G6, p. 53. 6 114 MEANS OF EXPRESSION Chap. IV. like manner fight with their tusks, do not retract their ears, but, on the contrary, erect them when rushing at each other or at an enemy. The rhinoceroses in the Zoological Gardens fight with their nasal horns, and have never been seen to attempt biting each other except in play ; and the keepers are convinced that they do not draw back their ears, like horses and dogs, when feeling savage. The following statement, therefore, by Sir S. Baker 34 is inex- plicable, namely, that a rhinoceros, which he shot in North Africa, " had no ears ; they had been bitten off " close to the head by another of the same species " while fighting; and this mutilation is by no means " uncommon." Lastly, with respect to monkeys. Some kinds, which have moveable ears, and which fight with their teeth — for instance the Cereopithecus ruber — draw back their ears when irritated just like dogs; and they then have a very spiteful appearance. Other kinds, as the Inuus ecaudatus, apparently do not thus act. Again, other kinds — and this is a great anomaly in comparison with most other animals — retract their ears, show their teeth, and jabber, when they are pleased by being caressed. I observed this in two or three species of Macacus, and in the Cynopithecus niger. This expression, owing to our familiarity with dogs, would never be recognised as one of joy or pleasure by those unacquainted with monkeys. Erection of the Ears. — This movement requires hardly any notice. All animals which have the power of freely moving their ears, when they are startled, or when they closely observe any object, direct their ears to S4 ' The Nile Tributaries of Abyssinia,' 1867, p. 443. Chap. IV. IN ANIMALS. 115 the point towards which they are looking, in order to hear any sound from this quarter. At the same time they generally raise their heads, as all their organs of sense are there situated, and some of the smaller animals rise on their hind legs. Even those kinds which squat on the ground or instantly flee away to avoid danger, generally act momentarily in this manner, in order to ascertain the source and nature of the danger. The head being raised, with erected ears and eyes directed forwards, gives an unmistakeable expression of close attention to any animal. 116 SPECIAL EXPKESSIONS: Chap. V. CHAPTER V. Special Expressions op Animals. The Dog, various expressive movements of — Cats — Horses — Ruminants — Monkeys, their expression of joy and affection — Of pain — Anger — Astonishment and Terror. The Bog. — I have already described (figs. 5 and 7) the appearance of a dog approaching another dog with hostile intentions, namely, with erected ears, eyes intently directed forwards,, hair on the neck and back bristling, gait remarkably stiff, with the tail upright and rigid. So familiar is this appearance to us, that an angry man is sometimes said " to have his back " up." Of the above points, the stiff gait and upright tail alone require further discussion. Sir C. Bell remarks 1 that, when a tiger or wolf is struok by its keeper and is suddenly roused to ferocity, "every *' muscle is in tension, and the limbs are in an attitude " of strained exertion, prepared to spring." This ten- sion of the muscles and consequent stiff gait may be accounted for on the principle of associated habit, for anger has continually led to fierce struggles, and con- sequently to all the muscles of the body having been violently exerted. There is also reason to suspect that the muscular system requires some short pre- paration, or some degree of innervation, before being brought into strong action. My own sensations lead me to this inference; but I cannot discover that it 1 ' The Anatomy of Expression,' 1844, p. 190. CilAP. V. DOGS. 117 is a conclusion admitted by physiologists. Sir J. Paget, however, informs me that when muscles are suddenly contracted with the greatest force, without any preparation, they are liable to be ruptured, as when a man slips unexpectedly ; but that this rarely occurs when an action, however violent, is deliberately performed. With respect to the upright position of the tail, it seems to depend (but whether this is really the case I know not) on the elevator muscles being more powerful than the depressors, so that when all the muscles of the hinder part of the body are in a state of tension, the tail is raised. A dog in cheerful spirits, and trotting before his master with high, elastic steps, generally carries his tail aloft, though it is not held nearly so stiffly as when he is angered. A horse when first turned out into an open field, may be seen to trot with long elastic strides, the head and tail being held high aloft. Even cows when they frisk about from pleasure, throw up their tails in a ridiculous fashion. So it is with various animals in the Zoological Gardens. The position of the tail, however, in certain cases, is determined by special circumstances ; thus as soon as a horse breaks into a gallop, at full speed, he always lowers his tail, so that as little resistance as possible may be offered to the air. When a dog is on the point of springing on his antagonist, he utters a savage growl ; the ears are pressed closely backwards, and the upper lip (fig. 14) is retracted out of the way of his teeth, especially of his canines. These movements may be observed with dogs and puppies in their play. But if a dog gets really savage in his play, his expression immediately changes. This, however, is simply due to the lips and ears being drawn back with much greater energy. If a dog only 118 SPECIAL EXPRESSIONS: Chap. V. snarls at another, the lip is generally retracted on one side alone, namely towards his enemy. The movements of a dog whilst exhibiting affection towards his master were described (figs. 6 and 8) in our second chapter. These consist in the head and Fig. 14. Head of snarling Dog. From life, by Mr. Wood. whole body being lowered and thrown into flexuous movements, with the tail extended and wagged from side to side. The ears fall down and are drawn some- what backwards, which causes the eyelids to be elon- gated, and alters, the whole appearance of the face. The lips hang loosely, and the hair remains smooth. All these movements or gestures are explicable, as I believe, from their standing in complete antithesis to those naturally assumed by a savage dog under a Chap. V. DOGS. 119 directly opposite state of mind. When a man merely speaks to, or just notices, his dog, we see the last vestige of these movements in a slight wag of the tail, without any other movement of the body, and without- even the ears being lowered. Dogs also exhibit their affection by desiring to rub against their masters, and to be rubbed or patted by them. Gratiolet explains the above gestures of affection in the following manner : and the reader can judge whether the explanation appears satisfactory. Speaking of animals in general, including the dog, he says, 2 " C'est toujours la partie la plus sensible de leurs corps " qui recherche les caresses ou les donne. Lorsque " toute la longueur des flancs et du corps est sensible, " l'animal serpente et rampe sous les caresses; et ces " ondulations se propageant le long des muscles analo- " gues des segments jusqu'aux extreiuites de la colonne u vertebrale, la queue se ploie et s'agite." Further on, he adds, that dogs, when feeling affectionate, lower their ears in order to exclude all sounds, so that their whole attention may be concentrated on the caresses of their master ! Dogs have another and striking way of exhibiting their affection, namely, by licking the hands or faces of their masters. They sometimes lick other dogs, and then it is always their chops. I have also seen dogs licking cats with whom they were friends. This habit probably originated in the females carefully licking their puppies — the dearest object of their love — for the sake of cleansing them. They also often give their puppies, after a short absence, a few cursory licks, appa- rently from affection. Thus the habit will have become associated with the emotion of love, however it may 2 De la Physionomie,' 1 8G5, pp. 187, 218. 120 SPECIAL EXPRESSIONS: Chap. V. afterwards be aroused. It is now so firmly inherited or innate, that it is transmitted equally to both sexes. A female terrier of mine lately had her puppies de- stroyed, and though at all times a very affectionate creature, I was much struck with the manner in which she then tried to satisfy her instinctive maternal love by expending it on me ; and her desire to lick my hands rose to an insatiable passion. The same principle probably explains why dogs, when feeling affectionate, like rubbing against their masters and being rubbed or patted by them, for from the nursing of their puppies, contact with a beloved object has become firmly associated in their minds with the emotion of love. The feeling of affection of a dog towards his master is combined with a strong sense of submission, which is akin to fear. Hence dogs not only lower their bodies and crouch a little as they approach their masters, but some- times throw themselves on the ground with their bellies upwards. This is a movement as completely opposite as is possible to any show of resistance. I formerly possessed a large dog who was not at all afraid to fight with other dogs; but a wolf-like shepherd-dog in the neighbourhood, though not ferocious and not so powerful as my dog, had a strange influence over him. When they met on the road, my dog used to run to meet him, w T ith his tail partly tucked in between his legs and hair not erected; and then he would throw himself on the ground, belly upwards. By this action he seemed to say more plainly than by w r ords, "Behold, I am " your slave." A pleasurable and excited state of mind, associated with affection, is exhibited by some dogs in a very peculiar manner ; namely, by grinning. This was noticed long ago by Somerville, who says, Chap. V DOGS. 121 " And with a courtly grin, the fawning hound Salutes thee cow'ring, his wide op'ning nose Upward he curls, and his large sloe-back eyes Melt in soft blandishments, and humble joy.' The Chase, book i. Sir W. Scott's famous Scotch greyhound, Maida, had this habit, and it is common with terriers. I have also seen it in a Spitz and in a sheep-dog. Mr. Kiviere, who has particularly attended to this expres- sion, informs me that it is rarely displayed in a perfect manner, but is quite common in a lesser degree. The upper lip during the act of grinning is retracted, as in snarling, so that the canines are exposed, and the ears are drawn backwards ; but the general appearance of the animal clearly shows that anger is not felt. Sir C. Beli 3 remarks "Dogs, in their expression of fond- " ness, have a slight eversion of the lips, and grin " and sniff amidst their gambols, in a way that re- sembles laughter." Some persons speak of the grin as a smile, but if it had been really a smile, we should see a similar, though more pronounced, movement of the lips and ears, when dogs utter their bark of joy ; but this is not the case, although a bark of joy often follows a grin. On the other hand, dogs, when playing with their comrades or masters, almost always pretend to bite each other ; and they then retract, though not energetically, their lips and ears. Hence I suspect that there is a tendency in some dogs, whenever they feel lively pleasure combined with affection, to act through habit and association on the same muscles, as in .playfully biting each other, or their masters' hands. I have described, in the second chapter, the gait and 3 ' The Anatomy of Expression,' 1844, p. 140. 122 SPECIAL expressions: Chap. V. appearance of a dog when cheerful, and the marked antithesis presented by the same animal when dejected and disappointed, with his head, ears, body, tail, and chops drooping, and eyes dull. Under the expectation of any great pleasure, dogs bound and jump about in an extravagant manner, and bark for joy. The ten- dency to bark under this state of mind is inherited, or runs in the breed : greyhounds rarely bark, whilst the Spitz-dog barks so incessantly on starting for a walk with his master that he becomes a nuisance. An agony of pain is expressed by dogs in nearly the same way as by many other animals, namely, by howling, writhing, and contortions of the whole body. Attention is shown by the head being raised, with the ears erected, and eyes intently directed towards the object or quarter under observation. If it be a sound and the source is not known, the head is often turned obliquely from side to side in a most significant manner, apparently in order to judge with more exactness from what point the sound proceeds. . But I have seen a dog greatly surprised at a new noise, turning his head to one side through habit, though he clearly perceived the source of the noise. Dogs, as formerly remarked, when their attention is in any way aroused, whilst watching some object, or attending to some sound, often lift up one paw (fig. 4) and keep it doubled up, as if to make a slow and stealthy approach. A dog under extreme terror will throw himself down, howl, and void his excretions ; but the hair, I believe, does not become erect unless some anger is felt. I have seen a dog much terrified at a band of musicians who were playing loudly outside the house, with every muscle of his body trembling, with his heart palpitating so quickly that the beats could hardly be counted, and panting for breath with widely open mouth, in the same manner CilAP. V. DOGS. 123 as a terrified man does. Yet this dog had not exerted himself; he had only wandered slowly and restlessly about the room, and the day was cold. Even a very slight degree of fear is invariably shown by the tail being tucked in between the legs. This tucking in of the tail is accompanied by the ears being drawn backwards ; but they are not pressed closely to the head, as in snarling, and they are not lowered, as when a dog is pleased or affectionate. When two young dogs chase each other in play, the one that runs away always keeps his tail tucked inwards. So it is when a dog, in the highest spirits, careers like a mad creature round and round his master in circles, or in figures of eight. He then acts as if another dog were chasing him. This curious kind of play, which must be familiar to every one who has attended to dogs, is particularly apt to be excited, after the animal has been a little startled or frightened, as by his master suddenly jumping out on him in the dusk. In this case, as well as when two young dogs are chasing each other in play, it appears as if the one that runs away was afraid of the other catching him by the tail ; but as far as I can find out, dogs very rarely catch each other in this manner. I asked a gentleman, who had kept foxhounds all his life, and he applied to other experienced sports- men, whether they had ever seen hounds thus seize a fox ; but they never had. It appears that when a dog is chased, or when in dal%er of being struck behind, or of anything falling on him, in all these cases he wishes to withdraw as quickly as possible his whole hind- quarters, and that from some sympathy or connection between the muscles, the tail is then drawn closely inwards. A similarly connected movement between the hind- quarters and the tail may be observed in the hyaena. 124 SPECIAL EXPRESSIONS: Chat. V. Mr. Bartlett informs me that when two of these animals light together, they are mutually conscious of the won- derful power of each other's jaws, and are extremely cautious. They well know that if one of their legs were seized, the bone would instantly be crushed into atoms ; hence they approach each other kneeling, with their legs turned as much as possible inwards, and with their whole bodies bowed, so as not to present any salient point ; the tail at the same time being closely tucked in between the legs. In this attitude they approach each other sideways, or even partly backwards. So again with deer, several of the species, when savage and fighting, tuck in their tails. When one horse in a field tries to bite the hind-quarters of another in play, or when a rough boy strikes a donkey from behind, the hind- quarters and the tail are drawn in, though it does not appear as if this were done merely to save the tail from being injured. We have also seen the reverse of these % movements ; for when an animal trots with high elastic steps, the tail is almost always carried aloft. As I have said, when a dog is chased and runs away, he keeps his ears directed backwards but still open ; and this is clearly done for the sake of hearing the footsteps of his pursuer. From habit the ears are often held in this same position, and the tail tucked in, when the danger is obviously in front. I have repeatedly noticed, with a timid terrier of mine, that when she is afraid of some object in front, the nafcire of which she perfectly knows and does not need to reconnoitre, yet she will for a long time hold her ears and tail in this position, looking the image of discomfort. Discomfort, without * any fear, is similarly expressed : thus, one day I went out of doors, just at the time when this same dog knew that her dinner would be brought. I did not call her, but she wished much to accompany me, and at the same Chap. V. DOGS. 125 time she wished much for her dinner; and there she stood, first looking one way and then the other, with her tail tucked in and ears drawn back, presenting an unmistakable appearance of perplexed discomfort. Almost all the expressive movements now described, with the exception of the grinning from joy, are innate or instinctive, for they are common to all the indivi- duals, young and old, of all the breeds. Most of them are likewise common to the aboriginal parents of the dog, namely the wolf and jackal ; and some of them to other species of the same group. Tamed wolves and jackals, when caressed by their masters, jump about for joy, wag their tails, lower their ears, lick their master's hands, crouch down, and even throw themselves on the ground belly upwards. 4 I have seen a rather fox-like African jackal, from the Gaboon, depress its ears when caressed. Wolves and jackals, when frightened, certainly tuck in their tails ; and a tamed jackal has been described as careering round his master in circles and figures of eight, like a dog, with his tail between his legs. It has been stated 5 that foxes, however tame, never display any of the above expressive movements; but this is not strictly accurate. Many years ago I observed in the Zoological Gardens, and recorded the fact at the time, that a very tame English fox, when caressed by the keeper, wagged its tail, depressed its ears, and then threw itself on the ground, belly upwards. The black fox 4 Many particulars are givdi by GuelcL nst'adt in his account of the jackal in Nov. Comm. Acad. Sc. Imp. Petrop. 1775, torn. xx. p. 449. See also another excellent account of th. 45. 12 "258 DISGUST. Chap. XL there is of course nothing disgusting in the soup itself. I presume that this follows from the strong association in our minds between the sight of food, however circum- stanced, and the idea of eating it. As the sensation of disgust primarily arises in con- nection with the act of eating or tasting, it is natural that its expression should consist chiefly in movements round the mouth. But as disgust also causes annoyance, it is generally accompanied by a frown, and often by gestures as if to push away or to guard oneself against the offensive object. In the two photographs (figs. 2 and 3, on Plate V.) Mr. Kejlander has simulated this ex- pression with some success. With respect to the face, moderate disgust is exhibited in various ways ; by the mouth being widely opened, as if to let an offensive morsel drop but ; by spitting ; by blowing out of the protruded . lips; or by a sound as of clearing the throat. Such guttural sounds are written ach or ugh ; and their utter- ance is sometimes accompanied by a shudder, the arms being pressed close to the sides and the shoulders raised in the same manner as when horror is experienced. 7 Extreme disgust is expressed by movements round the mouth identical with those preparatory to the act of vomiting. The mouth is opened widely, with the upper lip strongly retracted, which w 7 rinkles the sides of the nose, and with the lower lip protruded and everted as much as possible. This latter movement requires the contraction of the muscles which draw downwards the corners of the mouth. 8 It is remarkable how readily and instantly retching 1 See, to this effect, Mr. Hensleigh Wedgwood's Introduction to the ' Dictionary of English Etymology,' 2nd edit. 1872, p. xxxvii. 8 Duchenne believes that in the e version of the lower lip, the corners are drawn downwards by the depressores anguli oris. Henle (Hand- buch d. Anat. des Menschen, 1858, 13. i. s. 151) concludes that this is effected by the musculus quadratus menti. Chap. XI. DISGUST. 259 or actual vomiting is induced in some persons by the mere idea of having partaken of any unusual food, as of an animal which is not commonly eaten ; although there is nothing in such food to cause the stomach to reject it. When vomiting results, as a reflex action, from some real cause — as from too rich food, or tainted meat, or from an emetic — it does not ensue immediate ly, but generally after a considerable interval of time. Therefore, to account for retching or vomiting being so quickly and easily excited by a mere idea, the suspicion arises that our progenitors must formerly have had the power (like that possessed by ruminants and some other animals) of voluntarily rejecting food which dis- agreed with them, or which they thought would disagree with them; and now, though this power has been lost, as far as the will is concerned, it is called into involuntary action, through the force of a formerly well- e.tablished habit, whenever the mind revolts at the idea of having partaken of any kind of food, or at anything disgusting. This suspicion receives support from the fact, of which I am assured by Mr. Sutton, that the monkeys in the Zoological Gardens often vomit whilst in perfect health, which looks as if the act were volun- tary. We can see that as man is able to communicate by language to his children and others, the knowledge of the kinds of food to be avoided, he would have little occasion to use the faculty of voluntary rejection ; so that this power would tend to be lost through disuse. As the sense of smell is so intimately connected v th that of taste, it is not surprising that an excess' ely bad odour should excite retching or vomiting in some persons, quite as readily as the thought of revolting food does ; and that, as a further consequence, a moderately offensive odour should cause the various 260 DISGUST. Chap. XI. expressive movements of disgust. The tendency to retch from a fetid odour is immediately strengthened in a curious manner by some degree of habit, though soon lost by longer familiarity with the cause of offence and by voluntary restraint. For instance, I wished to clean the skeleton of a bird, which had not been suffi- ciently macerated, and the smell ma rl e my servant and myself (we not having had much experience in sucli work) retch so violently, that we were compelled to desist. During the previous days I had examined some other skeletons, which smelt slightly ; yet the odour did not in the least affect me, but, subsequently for several days, whenever I handled these same skeletons, they made me retch. From the answers received from my correspondents it appears that the various movements, which have now been described as expressing contempt and disgust, pre- vail throughout a large part of the world. Dr. Kothrock, for instance, answers with a decided affirmative with respect to certain wild Indian tribes of North America. Crantz says that when a Greenlander denies anything with contempt or horror he turns up his nose, and gives a slight sound through it. 9 Mr. Scott has sent me a graphic description of the face of a young Hindoo at the sight of castor- oil, which he was compelled occa- sionally to take. Mr. Scott has also seen the same expression on the faces of high-caste natives who have approached close to some defiling object. Mr. Bridges says that the Fuegians "express contempt by shooting '* ut the lips and hissing through them, and by turning " u A * the nose." The tendency either to snort through the nose, or to make a noise expressed by ugh or ach, is noticed by several of my correspondents. Spitting seems an almost universal sign of contempt 9 As quoted by Tylor, ' Primitive Culture,' 1871, vol. i. p. 169. Chap. XI. DISGUST. 261 or disgust ; and spitting obviously represents the rejec- tion of anything offensive from the mouth. Shakspeare makes the Duke of Norfolk say, " I spit at him — call " him a slanderous coward and a villain." So, again, Falstaff says, " Tell thee what, Hal, — if I tell thee a " lie, spit in my face." Leichhardt remarks that the Australians " interrupted their speeches by spitting, and " uttering a noise like pooh ! pooh ! apparently express- " ive of their disgust." And Captain Burton speaks of certain negroes " spitting with disgust upon the " ground." 10 Captain Speedy informs me that this is likewise the case with the Abyssinians. Mr. Geach says that with the Malays of Malacca the expression of disgust " answers to spitting from the mouth ; " and with the Fuegians, according to Mr. Bridges " to spit " at one is the highest mark of contempt." I never saw disgust more plainly expressed than on the face of one of my infants at the a*ge of five months, when, for the first time, some cold water, and again a month afterwards, when a piece of ripe cherry was put into his mouth. This was shown by the lips and whole mouth assuming a shape which allowed the contents to run or fall quickly out ; the tongue being likewise protruded. These movements were accom- panied by a little shudder. It was all the more comical, as I doubt whether the child felt real disgust — the eyes and forehead expressing much surprise and considera- tion. The protrusion of the tongue in letting a nasty object fall out of the mouth, may explain how it is that lolling out the tongue universally serves as a sign of contempt and hatred. 11 10 Both these quotations are given by Mr. H. Wedgwood, 1 On the Origin of Language,' 186G, p. 75. II This is stated to be the case by Mr. Tylor (Early Hist, of Mankind, 2nd edit. 1870, p. 52); and be adds, " it is not clear why this should be so." 262 GUILT. Chap. XI. We have now seen that scorn, disdain, contempt, and disgust are expressed in many different ways, by move- ments of the features, and by various gestures ; and that these are the same throughout the world. They all consist of actions representing the rejection or exclu- sion of some real object which we dislike or abhor, but which does not excite in us certain other strong emo- tions, such as rage or terror ; and through the force of habit and association similar actions are performed, whenever any analogous sensation arises in our minds. Jealousy, Envy, Avarice, Revenge, Suspicion, Deceit, Slyness, Guilt, Vanity, Conceit, Ambition, Pride, Humility, (Sec. — It is doubtful whether the greater number of the above complex states of mind are revealed by any fixed expression, sufficiently distinct to be described or delineated. When Shakspeare speaks of Envy as lean- faced, or Mack, or pale, and Jealousy as " the green-eyed monster;" and when Spenser describes Suspicion as "foul, ill-favoured, and grim," they must have felt this diffi- culty. Nevertheless, the above feelings — at least many of them — can be detected by the eye ; for instance, con- ceit ; but we are often guided in a much greater degree than we suppose by our previous knowledge of the per- sons or circumstances. My correspondents almost unanimously answer in the affirmative to my query, whether the expression of guilt and deceit can be recognised amongst the various races of man ; and I have confidence in their answers, as they generally deny that jealousy can thus be recognised. In the cases in which details are given, the eyes are almost always referred to. The guilty man is said to avoid looking at his accuser, or to give him stolen looks. The eyes are said " to be turned askant," or " to waver from " side to side," or " the eyelids to be lowered and partly Chap. XI. PRIDE. 2G3 44 closed." This latter remark is made by Mr. Hagenauer with respect to the Australians, and by Gaika with re- spect to the Kafirs. The restless movements of the eyes apparently follow, as will be explained when we treat of blushing, from the guilty man not enduring to meet the gaze of his accuser. I may add, that I have observed a guilty expression, without a shade of fear, in some of my own children at a very early age. In one instance the expression was unmistakably clear in a child two years and seven months old, and led to the detection of his little crime. It was shown, as I record in my notes made at the time, by an unnatural brightness in the eyes, and by an odd, affected manner, impossible to describe. Slyness is also, I believe, exhibited chiefly by move- ments about the eyes ; for these are less under the control of the will, owing to the force of long-continued habit, than are the movements of the body. Mr. Herbert Spencer remarks, 12 " When there is a desire to " see something on one side of the visual field without " being supposed to see it, the tendency is to check the (i conspicuous movement of the head, and to make the 44 required adjustment entirely with the eyes ; which 44 are, therefore, drawn very much to one side. Hence, 44 when the eyes are turned to one side, while the face is 44 not turned to the same side, we get the natural 44 language of what is called slyness." Of all the above-named complex emotions, Pride, per- haps, is the most plainly expressed. A proud man exhibits his sense of superiority over others by holding his head and body erect. He is haughty (haut), or high, and makes himself appear as large as possible ; so that metaphorically he is said to be swollen or puffed up 12 1 Principles of Psychology,' 2nd edit. 1872, p. 552. 2G4 HELPLESSNESS : Chap. XI. with pride. A peacock or a turkey-cock strutting about with puffed-up feathers, is sometimes said to be an em- blem of pride. 13 The arrogant man looks down on others, and with lowered eyelids hardly condescends to see them ; or he may show his contempt by slight movements, such as those before described, about the nostrils or lips, Hence the muscle which everts the lower lip has been called the musculus superbus. In some photographs of patients affected by a monomania of pride, sent me by Dr. Crichton Browne, the head and body were held erect, and the mouth firmly closed. This latter action, expressive of decision, follows, I presume, from the proud man feeling perfect self-confidence in himself. The whole expression of pride stands in direct antithesis to that of humility ; so that nothing need here be said of the latter state of mind. Helplessness, Impotence: Shrugging the shoulders. — When a man wishes to show that he cannot do some- thing, or prevent something being done, he often raises with a quick movement both shoulders. At the same time, if the whole gesture is completed, he bends his elbows closely inwards, raises his open hands, turning them outwards, with the fingers separated. The head is often thrown a little on one side ; the eyebrows are elevated, and this causes wrinkles across the forehead. The mouth is generally opened. I may mention, in order to show how unconsciously the fea- tures are thus acted on, that though I had often inten- tionally shrugged my shoulders to observe how my 13 Gratiolet (De la Phys. p. 351) makes this remark, and lias some good observations on the expression of pride. Ste Sir 0. Bell (' Anatomy of Expression,' p. Ill) on the action of the musculus superbus VI. 2G4 with pride. A with puffed-up blem of pride, others, and wit see them ; or movements, su nostrils or lips lower lip has some photogra of pride, sent and body wer closed. This follows, I presu self-confidence pride stands in that nothing r mind. Helplessness, When a man \ thing, or pre^ raises with a the same tim( he bends his hands, turning The head is c eyebrows are e the forehead, mention, in or< tures are thus tionally shrugs 13 Gratiolet (De good observations c of Expression,' p. 1 Chap. XI. SHRUGGING THE SHOULDERS. 265 arms were placed, I was not at all aware that my eye- brows were raised and mouth opened, until I looked at myself in a glass ; and since then I have noticed the same movements in the faces of others. In the accom- panying Plate VI., figs. 3 and 4, Mr. Rejlander has suc- cessfully acted the gesture of shrugging the shoulders. Englishmen are much less demonstrative than the men of most other European nations, and they shrug their shoulders far less frequently and energetically than Frenchmen or Italians do. The gesture varies in all degrees from the complex movement, just described, to only a momentary and scarcely perceptible raising of both shoulders ; or, as I have noticed in a lady sitting in an arm-chair, to the mere turning slightly outwards of the open hands with separated fingers. I have never seen very young English children shrug their shoulders, but the following case was observed with care by a medical professor and excellent observer, and has been communicated to me by him. The father of this gen- tleman was a Parisian, and his mother a Scotch lady. His wife is of British extraction on both sides, and my informant does not believe that she ever shrugged her shoulders in her life. His children have been reared in England, and the nursemaid is a thorough English- woman, who has never been seen to shrug her shoulders. Now, his eldest daughter was observed to shrug her shoulders at the age of between sixteen and eighteen months ; her mother exclaiming at the time, " Look at " the little French girl shrugging her shoulders ! " At first she often acted thus, sometimes throwing her head a little backwards and on one side, but she did' not, as far as was observed, move her elbows and hands in the usual manner. The habit gradually wore away, and now, when she is a little over four years old, she is never seen to act thus. The father is told that he sometimes 266 HELPLESSNESS : Chap. XI. shrugs his shoulders, especially when arguing with any- one ; but it is extremely improbable that his daughter should have imitated him at so early an age ; for, as he remarks, she could not possibly have often seen this gesture in him. Moreover, if the habit had been ac- quired through imitation, it is not probable that it would so soon have been spontaneously discontinued by this child, and, as we shall immediately see, by a second child, though the father still lived with his family. This little girl, it may be added, resembles her Parisian grandfather in countenance to an almost absurd degree. She also presents another and very curious resemblance to him, namely, by practising a singular trick. When she impatiently wants something, she holds out her little hand, and rapidly rubs the thumb against the index and middle finger: now this same trick was fre- quently performed under the same circumstances by her grandfather. This gentleman's second daughter also shrugged her shoulders before the age of eighteen months, and afterwards discontinued the habit. It is of course pos- sible that she may have imitated her elder sister ; but she continued it after her sister had lost the habit. She at first resembled her Parisian grandfather in a less degree than did her sister at the same age, but now in a greater degree. She likewise practises to the present time the peculiar habit of rubbing together, when im- patient, her thumb and two of her fore-fingers. In this latter case we have a good instance, like those given in a former chapter, of the inheritance of a trick or gesture ; for no one, I presume, will attribute to mere coincidence so peculiar a habit as this, which was com- mon to the grandfather and his two grandchildren who had never seen him. Considering all the circumstances with reference to Chap. XI. SHRUGGING THE SHOULDERS. 267 these children shrugging their shoulders, it can hardly be doubted that they have inherited the habit from their French progenitors, although they have only one quarter French blood in their veins, and although their grandfather did not often shrug his shoulders. There is nothing very unusual, though the fact is interesting, in these children having gained by inheritance a habit during early youth, and then discontinuing it ; for it is of frequent occurrence with many kinds of animals that certain characters are retained for a period by the young, and are then lost. As it appeared to me at one time improbable in a high degree that so complex a gesture as shrugging the shoulders, together with the accompanying move- ments, should be innate, I was anxious to ascertain whether the blind and deaf Laura Bridgman, who could not have learnt the habit by imitation, practised it. And I have heard, through Dr. Innes, from a lady who has lately had charge of her, that she does shrug her shoulders, turn in her elbows, and raise her eyebrows in the same manner as other people, and under the same circumstances. I was also anxious to learn whether this gesture was practised by the various races of man, espe- cially by those who never have* had much intercourse with Europeans. We shall see that they act in this manner ; but it appears that the gesture is sometimes confined to merely raising or shrugging the shoulders, without the other movements. Mr. Scott has frequently seen this gesture in the Bengalees and Dhangars (the latter constituting a dis- tinct race) who are employed in the Botanic Garden at Calcutta ; when, for instance, they have declared that they could not do some work, such as lifting a heavy weight. He ordered a Bengalee to climb a lofty tree ; but the man, with a shrug of his shoulders and a lateraJ 268 HELPLESSNESS ! Chap. XL shake of his head, said he could not. Mr. Scott know- ing that the man was lazy, thought he could, and in- sisted on his trying. His face now became pale, his arms dropped to his sides, his mouth and eyes were widely opened, and again surveying the tree, he looked askant at Mr. Scott, shrugged his shoulders, inverted his elbows, extended his open hands, and with a few quick lateral shakes of the head declared his inability. Mr. H. Erskine has likewise seen the natives of India shrugging their shoulders ; but he has never seen the elbows turned so much inwards as with us ; and whilst shrugging their shoulders they sometimes lay their un- crossed hands on their breasts. With the wild Malays of the interior of Malacca, and with the Bugis(true Malays, though speaking a different language), Mr. Geach has often seen this gesture. I presume that it is complete, as, in answer to my query descriptive of the movements of the shoulders, arms, hands, and face, Mr. Geach remarks, " it is performed " in a beautiful style." I have lost an extract from a scientific voyage, in which shrugging the shoulders by some natives (Micronesians) of the Caroline Archipelago in the Pacific Ocean, was well described. Capt. Speedy informs me that the Abyssinians shrug their shoulders, but enters into no details. Mrs. Asa Gray saw an Arab dragoman in Alexandria acting exactly as describe 1 in my query, when an old gentleman, on whom he attended, would not go in the proper direction which had been pointed out to him. Mr. Washington Matthews says, in reference to the wild Indian tribes of the western parts of the United States, "I have on a few occasions detected men using " a slight apologetic shrug, but the rest of the demon- " stration which you describe I have not witnessed." Fritz Muller informs me that he has seen the negroes Chap. XI. SHRUGGING THE SHOULDERS. 269 in Brazil shrugging their shoulders ; but it is of course possible that they may have learnt to do so by imitating the Portuguese. Mrs. Barber has never seen this ges- ture with the Kafirs of South Africa ; and Gaika, judging from his answer, did not even understand what was meant by my description. Mr. Swinhoe is also doubtful about the Chinese ; but he has seen them, under the circumstances which would make us shrug our shoulders, press their right elbow against their side, raise their eyebrows, lift up their hand with the palm directed towards the person addressed, and shake it from right to left. Lastly, with respect to the Australians, four of my informants answer by a simple negative, and one by a simple affirmative. Mr. Bunnett, who has had excellent opportunities for observation on the borders of the Colony of Victoria, also answers by a " yes," adding that the gesture is performed " in a more "subdued and less demonstrative manner than is the " case with civilized nations." This circumstance may account for its not having been noticed by four of my informants. These statements, relating to Europeans, Hindoos, the hill-tribes of India, Malays, Micronesians, Abyssinians, Arabs, Negroes, 'Indians of North America, and appa- rently to the Australians — many of these natives having had scarcely any intercourse with Europeans — are suffi- cient to show that shrugging the shoulders, accompanied in some cases by the other proper movements, is a ges- ture natural to mankind. This gesture implies an unintentional or unavoidable action on our own part, or one that we cannot perform ; or an action performed by another person which we cannot prevent. It accompanies such speeches as, " It " was not my fault ;" " It is impossible for me to grant i( this favour ;" " He must follow his own course, I can- 270 HELPLESSNESS t Chap. XI. " not stop him." Shrugging the shoulders likewise ex- presses patience, or the absence of any intention to resist. Hence the muscles which raise the shoulders are some- times called, as I have been informed by an artist, " the " patience muscles." Shylock the Jew, says, " Signor Antonio, many a time and oft In the Rialto have you rated me About my monies and usances ; Still have I borne it with a patient shrug." Merchant of Venice, act i. sc. 3. Sir C. Bell has given 14 a life-like figure of a man, who is shrinking back from some terrible danger, and is on the point of screaming out in abject terror. He is represented with his shoulders lifted up almost to his ears ; and this at once declares that there is no thought of resistance. As shrugging the shoulders generally implies " I " cannot do this or that," so by a slight change, it sometimes implies " I won't do it." The movement then expresses a dogged determination not to act. Olmsted describes 15 an Indian in Texas as giving a great shrug to his shoulders, when he was informed that a party of men were Germans and not Americans, thus expressing that he would have nothing to do with them. Sulky and obstinate children may be seen with both their shoulders raised high up; but this movement is not associated with the others which generally accompany a true shrug. An excellent ob- server 16 in describing a young man who was deter- mined not to yield to his father's desire, says, "He " thrust his hands deep down into his pockets, and " set up his shoulders to his ears, which was a good 14 1 Anatomy of Expression,' p. 166. 15 ' Journey through Texas/ p. 352. 16 Mrs. Oliphaut, ' The Brownlows,' vol. ii. p. 206. Chap. XL SHRUGGING THE SHOULDERS. 271 " warning that, come right or wrong, this rock should " fly from its firm base as soon as Jack would ; and " that any remonstrance on the subject was purely " futile." As soon as the son got his own way, he " put his shoulders into their natural position." Kesignation is sometimes shown by the open hands being placed, one over the other, on the lower part of the body. I should not have thought this little gesture worth even a passing notice, had not Dr. W. Ogle re- marked to me that he had two or three times observed it in patients who were preparing for operations under chloroform. They exhibited no great fear, but seemed to declare by this posture of their hands, that they had made up their minds, and were resigned to the inevi- table. We may now inquire why men in all parts of the world when they feel, — whether or not they wish to show this feeling, — that they cannot or will not do something, or will not resist something if done by another, shrug their shoulders, at the same time often bending in their elbows, showing the palms of their hands with extended fingers, often throwing their heads a little on one side, raising their eyebrows, and opening their mouths. These states of the mind are either simply passive, or show a determination not to act. None of the above movements are of the least service. The explanation lies, I cannot doubt, in the principle of unconscious antithesis. This principle here seems to come into play as clearly as in the case of a dog, who, when feeling savage, puts himself in the proper attitude for attacking and for making himself appear terrible to his enemy; but as soon as he feels affectionate, throws his whole body into a directly opposite attitude, though this is of no direct use to him. Let it be observed how an indignant man, who resents, 272 HELPLESSNESS : Chap. XI. and will not submit to some injury, holds his head erect, squares his shoulders, and expands his chest. He often clenches his fists, and puts one or both arms in the proper position for attack or defence, with the muscles of his limbs rigid. He frowns, — that is, he contracts and lowers his brows, — and, being determined, closes his mouth. The actions and attitude of a helpless man are, in every one of these respects, exactly the reverse. In Plate VI. we may imagine one of the figures on the left side to have just said, "What do you mean by " insulting me?" and one of the figures on the right side to answer, " I really could not help it." The help- less man unconsciously contracts the muscles of his fore- head which are antagonistic to those that cause a frown, and thus raises his eyebrows ; at the same time he re- laxes the muscles about the mouth, so that the lower jaw drops. The antithesis is complete in every detail, not only in the movements of the features, but in the position of the limbs and in the attitude of the whole body, as may be seen in the accompanying plate. As the helpless or apologetic man often wishes to show his state of mind, he then acts in a conspicuous or demonstrative manner. In accordance with the fact that squaring the elbows and clenching the fists are gestures by no means uni- versal with the men of all races, when they feel indig- nant and are prepared to attack their enemy, so it appears that a helpless or apologetic frame of mind is expressed in many parts of the world by merely shrug- ging "the shoulders, without turning inwards the elbows and opening the hands. The man or child who is obstinate, or one who is resigned to some great mis- fortune, has in neither case any idea of resistance by active means ; and he expresses this state of mind, by simply keeping his shoulders raised ; or he may possibly fold his arms across his breast. Chap. XL SIGNS OF AFFIRMATION, ETC. 273 Signs of affirmation or approval, and of negation or disapproval: nodding and shaking the head. — I was curious to ascertain how far the common signs used by us in affirmation and negation were general throughout the world. These signs are indeed to a certain extent expressive of our feelings, as we give a vertical nod of approval with a smile to our children, when we approve of their conduct ; and shake our heads laterally with a frown, when we disapprove. With infants, the first act of denial consists in ^refusing food ; and I repeatedly noticed with my own infants, that they did so by withdrawing their heads laterally from the breast, or from anything offered them in a spoon. In accepting food and taking it into their mouths, they incline their heads forwards. Since making these observations I have been informed that the same idea had occurred to Charma. 17 It deserves notice that in accepting or taking food, there is only a single movement forward, and a single nod implies an affirmation. On the other hand, in refusing food, especially if it be pressed on them, children frequently move their heads several times from side to side, as we do in shaking our heads in negation. Moreover, in the case of refusal, the head is not rarely thrown backwards, or the mouth is closed, so that these movements might likewise come to serve as signs of negation. Mr. Wedgwood remarks on this subject, 18 that " when the voice is exerted with closed " teeth or lips, it produces the sound of the letter n or " m. Hence we may account for the use of the particle " ne to signify negation, and possibly also of the Greek " fjurj in the same sense." 17 1 Essai sur le Langage,' 2nd edit. 1846. I am much indebted to Miss Wedgwood for having given me this information, with an extract from the work. 18 ' On the Origin of Language,' 18G6, p. 91. 274 SIGNS OF AFFIRMATION Chap. XI. That these signs are innate or instinctive, at least with Anglo-Saxons, is rendered highly probable by the blind and deaf Laura Bridgman "constantly accom- " panying her yes with the common affirmative nod, " and her no with our negative shake of the head." Had not Mr. Lieber stated to the contrary, 19 I should have imagined that these gestures might have beer, acquired or .learnt by her, considering her wonderful sense of touch and appreciation of the movements of others. With microcephalous idiots, who are so de- graded that they never learn to speak, one of them is described by Vogt, 20 as answering, when asked whether he wished for more food or drink, by inclining or shaking his head. Schmalz, in his remarkable dis- sertation on the education of the deaf and dumb, as well as of children raised, only one degree above idiotcy, assumes that they can always both make and under- stand the common signs of affirmation and negation. 21 Nevertheless if wo look to the various races of man, these signs are not so universally employed as I should have expected ; yet they seem too general to be ranked as altogether conventional or artificial. My informants assert that both signs are used by the Malays, by the natives of Ceylon, the Chinese, the negroes of the Guinea coast, and, according to Gaika, by the Kafirs of South Africa, though with these latter people Mrs. Barber has never seen a lateral shake used as a nega- tive. With respect to the Australians, seven observers agree that a nod is given in affirmation ; five agree about a lateral shake in negation, accompanied or not 19 4 On the Vocal Sounds of L. Bridgman Smithsonian Contribu- tions, 1851, vol. ii. p. 11. 20 * Memoire sur les Microcephales,' 1867, p. 27. 21 Quoted by Tylor, ' Early History of Mankind,' 2nd edit. 1870, p. as. Chap. XI. AND NEGATION. 275 by some word; but Mr. Dyson Lacy has never seen this latter sign in Queensland, and Mr. Bulmer says that in Gipps' Land a negative is expressed by throwing the head a little backwards and putting out the tongue. At the northern extremity of the continent, near Torres Straits, the natives when uttering a negative "don't ' 4 shake the head with it, but holding up the right " hand, shake it by turning it half round and back " again two or three times." 22 The throwing back of the head with a cluck of the tongue is said to be used as a negative by the modern Greeks and Turks, the latter people expressing yes by a movement like that made by us when we shake our heads. 23 The Abys- sinians, as I am informed by Captain Speedy, express a negative by jerking the head to the right shoulder, together with a slight cluck, the mouth being closed ; an affirmation is expressed by the head being thrown backwards and the eyebrows raised for an instant. The Tagals of Luzon, in the Philippine Archipelago, as I hear from Dr. Adolf Meyer, when they say " yes," also throw the head backwards. According to the Kajah Brooke, the Dyaks of Borneo express an affirmation by raising the eyebrows, and a negation by slightly con- tracting them, together with a peculiar look from the eyes. With the Arabs on the Nile, Professor and Mrs. Asa Gray concluded that nodding in affirmation was rare, whilst shaking the head in negation was never used, and was not even understood by them. With the Esquimaux 24 a nod means yes and a wink no. The New Zealanders " elevate the head and chin in place " of nodding acquiescence." 25 22 Mr. J. B. Jukes, 4 Letters and Extracts,' &c. 1871, p. 248. 23 F. Lieber, ' On the Yocal Sounds,' &c. p. 11. Tylor, ibid. p. 53. 24 Dr. King, Edinburgh Phil. Journal, 1845, p. 313. 25 Tylor, 'Early History of Mankind,' 2nd edit. 1870, p. 53. .276 SIGNS OF AFFIRMATION Chap. XI. With the Hindoos Mr. H. Erskine concludes from inquiries made from experienced Europeans, and from native gentlemen, that the signs of affirmation and negation vary — a nod and a lateral shake being some- times used as we do ; but a negative is more commonly expressed by the head being thrown suddenly back- wards and a little to one side, with a cluck of the tongue. What the meaning may be of this cluck of the tongue, which has been observed with various people, I cannot imagine. A native gentleman stated that affirmation is frequently shown by the head being thrown to the left. I asked Mr. Scott to attend par- ticularly to this point, and, after repeated observations, he believes that a vertical nod is not commonly used by the natives in affirmation, but that the head is first thrown backwards either to the left or right, and then jerked obliquely forwards only once. This movement would perhaps have been described by a less careful observer as a lateral shake. He also states that in negation the head is usually held nearly upright, and shaken several times. Mr. Bridges informs me that the Fuegians nod their heads vertically in affirmation, and shake them laterally in denial. With the wild Indians of North America, according to Mr. Washington Matthews, nodding and shaking the head have been learnt from Europeans, and are not naturally employed. They express affirma- tion "by describing with the hand (all the fingers " except the index being flexed) a curve downwards " and outwards from the body, whilst negation is ex- " pressed by moving the open hand outwards, with the " palm facing inwards." Other observers state that the sign of affirmation with these Indians is the fore- finger being raised, and then lowered and pointed to the ground, or the hand is waved straight forward from the Chap. XI. AND NEGATION. 277 face ; and that the sign of negation is the finger or whole hand shaken from side to side. 26 This latter movement probably represents in all cases the lateral shaking of the head. The Italians are said in like manner to move the lifted finger from right to left in negation, as indeed we English sometimes do. On the whole we find considerable diversity in the signs of affirmation and negation in the different races of man. With respect to negation, if we admit that the shaking of the finger or hand from side to side is symbolic of the lateral movement of the head ; and if we admit that the sudden backward movement of the head represents one of the actions often practised by young children in refusing food, then there is much uniformity throughout the world in the signs of negation, and we can see how they originated. The most marked exceptions are presented by the Arabs, Esquimaux, some Australian tribes, and Dyaks. With the latter a frown is the sign of negation, and with us frowning often accompanies a lateral shake of the head. With respect to nodding in affirmation, the excep- tions are rather more numerous, namely with some of the Hindoos, with the Turks, Abyssinians, Dyaks, Tagals, and New Zealanders. The eyebrows are some- times raised in affirmation, and as a person in bending his head forwards and downwards naturally looks up to the person whom he addresses, he will be apt to raise his eyebrows, and this sign may thus have arisen as an abbreviation. So again with the New Zealanders, the lifting up the chin and head in affirmation may perhaps represent in an abbreviated form the upward movement of the head after it has been nodded forwards and downwards. 26 Lubbock, ' TJie Origin of Civilization/ 1870, p. 277. Tylor, ibid, p. 38. Liebcr (ibid. p. 11) remarks on the negative of (he Italians. 278 SURPRISE. Chap. XII. CHAPTER XII. Surprise — Astonishment — Fear — Horror. Surprise, astonishment — Elevation of the eyebrows — Opening the mouth — Protrusion of the lips — Gestures accompanying surprise — Admiration — Fear — Terror — Erection of the hair — Contraction of the platysma muscle — Dilatation of the pupils — Horror — Conclusion. Attention, if sudden and close, graduates into sur- prise ; and this into astonishment ; and tin's into stupefied amazement. The latter frame of mind is closely akin to terror. Attention is shown by the eye- brows being slightly raised ; and as this state increases ' into surprise, they are raised to a much greater extent, with the eyes and mouth widely open. The raising of the eyebrows is necessary in order that the eyes should be opened quickly and widely; and this movement produces transverse wrinkles across the forehead. The degree to which the eyes and mouth are opened corre- sponds with the degree of surprise felt ; but these movements must be co-ordinated ; for a widely opened mouth with eyebrows only slightly raised results in a meaningless grimace, as Dr. Duchenne has shown in one of his photographs. 1 On the other hand, a person may often be seen to pretend surprise by merely raising his eyebrows. Dr. Duchenne lias given a photograph of an old man with his eyebrows well elevated and arched by the galvanization of the frontal muscle ; and with his 1 ' Me'canisme de la Physionomie,' Album, 1862, p. 42. Chap. Xli. SURPRISE. 279 mouth voluntarily opened. This figure expresses sur- prise with much truth. I showed it to twenty-four persons without a word of explanation, and one alone did not at all understand what was intended. A second person answered terror, which is not far wrong; some of the others, however, added to the words surprise or astonishment, the epithets horrified, woful, painful, or disgusted. The eyes and mouth being widely open is an expres- sion universally recognised as one of surprise or aston- ishment. Thus Shakespeare says, " I saw a smith stand " with open mouth swallowing a tailor's news." ('King John,' act iv. scene ii.) And again, "They seemed " almost, with staring on one another, to tear the cases " of their eyes ; there was speech in their dumbness, " language in their very gesture ; they looked as they "had heard of a world destroyed." (< Winter's Tale,' act v. scene ii.) My informants answer with remarkable uniformity to the samB effect, with respect to the various races of man ; the above movements of the features being often accompanied by certain gestures and sounds, presently to be described. Twelve observers in different parts of Australia agree on this head. Mr. Winwood Eeade has observed this expression with the negroes on the Guinea coast. The chief Gaika and others answer yes to my query with respect to the Kafirs of South Africa ; and so do others emphatically with reference' to the Abyssinians, Ceylonese, Chinese, Fuegians, various tribes of North America, and New Zealanders. With the latter, Mr. Stack states that the expression is more plainly shown by certain individuals than by others, though all endeavour as much as possible to conceal their feelings. The Dyaks of Borneo are said by the Rajah Brooke to open their eyes widely, when aston- 280 ASTONISHMENT. Chap. XII. ished, often swinging their heads to and fro, and beating their breasts. Mr. Scott informs me that the workmen in the Botanic Gardens at Calcutta are strictly ordered not to smoke; but they often disobey this order, and when suddenly surprised in the act, they first open their eyes and mouths widely. They then often slightly shrug their shoulders, as they perceive that discovery is in- evitable, or frown and stamp on the ground from vexa- tion. Soon they recover from their surprise, and abject fear is exhibited by the relaxation of all their muscles ; their heads seem to sink between their shoulders ; their fallen eyes wander to and fro ; and they supplicate forgiveness. The well-known Australian explorer, Mr. Stuart, has given 2 a striking account of stupefied amazement together with terror in a native who had never before seen a man on horseback. Mr. Stuart approached unseen and called to him from a little distance. " He " turned round and saw me. What he imagined I " was I do not know ; but a finer picture of fear and " astonishment I never saw. He stood incapable of " moving a limb, riveted to the spot, mouth open and " eyes staring. . . . He remained motionless until our " black got within a few yards of him, when suddenly " throwing down his waddies, he jumped into a mulga " bush as high as he could get." He could not speak, and answered not a word to the inquiries made by the black, but, trembling from Jaead to foot, " waved " with his hand for us to be off." That the eyebrows are raised by an innate or instinc- tive impulse may be inferred from the fact that Laura Bridgman invariably acts thus when astonished, as I have been assured by the lady who has lately had 2 'The Polyglot News Letter,' Melbourne, Dec. 1858, p. 2. Chap. XII. ASTONISHMENT. 281 charge of her. As surprise is excited by something unexpected or unknown, we naturally desire, when startled, to perceive the cause as quickly as possible; and we consequently open our eyes fully, so that the field of vision may be increased, and the eyeballs moved easily in any direction. But this hardly accounts for the eyebrows being so greatly raised as is the case, and for the wild staring of the open eyes. The explanation lies, I believe, in the impossibility of opening the eyes with great rapidity by merely raising the upper lids. To effect this the eyebrows must be lifted energetically. Any one who will try to open his eyes as quickly as possible before a mirror will find that he acts thus; and the energetic lifting up of the eyebrows opens the eyes so widely that they stare, the white being exposed all round the iris. Moreover, the elevation of the eyebrows is an advantage in looking upwards ; for as long as- they are lowered they impede our vision in this direction. Sir C. Bell gives 3 a curious little proof of the part which the eyebrows play in opening the eyelids. In a stupidly drunken man all the muscles are relaxed, and the eyelids consequently droop, in the same manner as when we are falling asleep. To counteract this ten- dency the drunkard raises his -eyebrows ; and this gives to him a puzzled, foolish look, as is well represented in one of Hogarth's drawings. The habit of raising the eyebrows having once been gained in order to see as quickly as possible all around us, the movement would follow from the force of association whenever astonish- ment was felt from any cause, even from a sudden sound or an idea. With adult persons, when the eyebrows are raised, the whole forehead becomes much wrinkled in traris- 8 ' Tl.c Anatomy of Expression,' p 106. 13 282 ASTONISHMENT. Chap. XII. verse lines ; but with children this occurs only to a slight degree. The wrinkles run in lines concentric with each eyebrow, and are partially confluent in the middle. They are highly characteristic of the expression of surprise or astonishment. Each eyebrow, when raised, becomes also, as Duchenne remarks, 4 more arched than it was before. The cause of the mouth being opened when astonish- ment is felt, is a much more complex affair ; and several causes apparently concur in leading to this movement. It has often been supposed 5 that the sense of hearing is thus rendered more acute; but I have watched persons listening intently to a slight noise, the nature and source of which they knew perfectly, and they did not open their mouths. Therefore I at one time imagined that the open mouth might aid in dis- tinguishing the direction whence a sound proceeded, by giving another channel for its entrance into the ear through the eustachian tube. But Dr. W. Ogle 6 has been so kind as to search the best recent authorities on the functions of the eustachian tube ; and he informs me that it is almost conclusively proved that it remains closed except during the act of deglutition ; and that in persons in whom the tube remains abnormally open, the sense of hearing; as far as external sounds are con- cerned, is by no means improved; on the contrary, it is impaired by the respiratory sounds being rendered more distinct. If a watch be placed within the mouth, but not allowed to touch the sides, the ticking is heard much less plainly than when held outside. In persor.f, 4 ' Me'canisme de la Physionomie,' Album, p. 6. 5 See, for instance, Dr. Piderit (' Mimik und Physiognomik,' s. 88), who h is a good discu-sion on the expression of surprise. 6 Dr. Muiie has also given me information leading to the same con- clusion, derived in part from comparative anatomy. Chap. XII. ASTONISHMENT. 283 in whom from disease or a cold the eustachian tube is permanently or temporarily closed, the sense of hearing is injured ; but this may be accounted for by mucus accumulating within the tube, and the consequent exclusion of air. We may therefore infer that the mouth is not kept open under the sense of astonish- ment for the sake of hearing sounds more distinctly ; notwithstanding that most deaf people keep their mouths open. Every sudden emotion, including astonishment, quickens the action of the heart, and with it the respiration. Now we can breathe, as Gratiolet remarks 7 and as appears to me to be the case, much more quietly through the open mouth than through the nostrils. Therefore, when we wish to listen intently to any sound, we either stop breathing, or breathe as quietly as possible, by opening our mouths, at the same time keeping our bodies motionless. One of my sons was awakened in the night by a noise under circum- stances which naturally led to great care, and after a few minutes he perceived that his mouth was widely open. He then became conscious that he had opened it for the sake of breathing as quietly as possible. This view receives support from the reversed case which occurs with dogs. A dog when panting after exercise, or on a hot day, breathes loudly ; but if his attention be suddenly aroused, he instantly pricks his ears to listen, shuts his mouth, and breathes quietly, as he is enabled to do, through his nostrils. When the attention is concentrated for a length of * time with fixed earnestness on any object or subject, all the organs of the body are forgotten and neglected ; 8 7 ' De la Pbysionomie,' 18G5, p. 234. 8 See, on this subject, Gratiolet, ibid. p. 254. 284 ASTONISHMENT. Chap. XII. and as the nervous energy of each individual is limited in amount, little is transmitted to any part of the system, excepting that which is at the time brought into energetic action. Therefore many of the muscles tend to become relaxed, and the jaw drops from its own weight. This will account for the dropping of the jaw and open mouth of a man stupefied with amazement, and perhaps when less strongly affected. I have noticed this appearance, as I find recorded in my notes, in very young children when they were only moderately sur- prised. There is still another and highly effective cause, leading to the mouth being opened, when we are astonished, and more especially when we are suddenly startled. We can draw a full and deep inspiration much more easily through the widely open mouth than through the nostrils. Now when we start at any sudden sound or sight, almost all the muscles of the bddy are involuntarily and momentarily thrown into strong action, for the sake of guarding ourselves against or jumping away from the danger, which we habitually associate with anything unexpected. But we always unconsciously prepare ourselves for any great exertion, as formerly explained, by first taking a deep and full inspiration, and we consequently open our mouths. If no exertion follows, and we still remain astonished, we cease for a time to breathe, or breathe as quietly as possible, in order that every sound may be distinctly heard. Or again, if our attention continues long and earnestly absorbed, all our muscles become relaxed, and the jaw, which was at first suddenly opened, remains dropped. Thus several causes concur towards this same movement, whenever surprise, astonishment, or amaze- ment is felt. Although when thus affected, our mouths are gene- Chap. XII. ASTONISHMENT. 285 rally opened, yet the lips are often a little protruded. This fact reminds us of the same movement, though in a much more strongly marked degree, in the chim- panzee and orang when astonished. As . a strong ex- piration naturally follows the deep inspiration which accompanies the first sense of startled surprise, and as the lips are often protruded, the various sounds which are then commonly uttered can apparently be accounted for. But sometimes a strong expiration alone is heard ; thus Laura Bridgman, when" amazed, rounds and pro- trudes her lips, opens them, and breathes strongly. 9 One of the commonest sounds is a deep Oh ; and this would naturally follow, as explained by Helmholtz, from the mouth being moderately opened and the lips pro- truded. On a quiet night some rockets were fired from the ' Beagle,' in a little creek at Tahiti, to amuse the natives ; and as each rocket was let off there was absolute silence, but this was invariably followed by a deep groaning Oh, resounding all round the bay. Mr. Washington Matthews says that the North American Indians express astonishment by a groan; and the negroes on the West Coast of Africa, according to Mr. Winwood Keade, protrude their lips, and make a sound like heigh, heigh. If the mouth is not much opened, whilst the lips are considerably protruded, a blowing, hissing, or whistling noise is produced. Mr. R. Brough Smith informs me that an Australian from the interior was taken to the theatre to see an acrobat rapidly turning head over heels : " he was greatly " astonished, and protruded his lips, making a noise " with his mouth as if blowing out a match." Accord- ing to Mr. Bulmer the Australians, when surprised, utter 9 Lieber, ■ On the Vocal Sounds of Laura Bridgman,' Smithsonian Contributions, 1851, vol. ii. p. 7. 286 ASTONISHMENT. Chap. XII. the exclamation korki, "and to do this the mouth is " drawn out as if going to whistle." We Europeans often whistle as a sign of surprise ; thus, in a recent novel 10 it is said, " here the man expressed his aston- " ishment and disapprobation by a prolonged whistle." A Kafir girl, as Mr. J. Mansel Weale informs me, " on " hearing of the high price of an article, raised her " eyebrows and whistled just as a European would." Mr. Wedgwood remarks that .such sounds are written down as whew, and they serve as interjections for sur- prise. According to three other observers, the Australians often evince astonishment by a clucking noise. Euro- peans also sometimes express gentle surprise by a little clicking noise of nearly the same kind. We have seen that when we are startled, the mouth is suddenly opened; and if the tongue happens to be then pressed closely against the palate, its sudden withdrawal will produce a sound of this kind, which might thus come to express surprise. Turning to gestures of the body. A surprised person often raises his opened hands high above his head, or by bending his arms only to the level of his face. The flat palms are directed towards the person who causes this feeling, and the straightened fingers are separated. This gesture is represented by Mr. Rejlander in Plate VII. fig. 1. In the * Last Supper,' by Leonardo da Vinci, two of the Apostles have their hands half uplifted, clearly expressive of their astonishment. A trust- worthy observer told me that he had lately met his wife , under most unexpected circumstances : " She started, " opened her mouth and eyes very widely, and threw " up both her arms above her head." Several years 10 ' Wenderholrae,' vol. ii. p. 91. Chap. XII. ASTONISHMENT. 287 ago I was surprised by seeing several of my young children earnestly doing something together on the ground ; but the distance was too great for me to ask what they were about. Therefore 1 threw up my open hands with extended fingers above my head ; and as soon as I had done this, I became conscious of the action. I then waited, without saying a word, to see if my children had understood this gesture ; and as they came running to me they cried out, " We saw that you were astonished '* at us." I do not know whether this gesture is common to the various races of man, as I neglected to make inquiries on this head. That it is innate or natural may be inferred from the fact that Laura Bridgrnan, when amazed, " spreads her arms and turns her hands with extended fingers upwards ; " 11 nor is it likely, con- sidering that the feeling of surprise is generally a brief one, that she should have learnt this gesture through her keen sense of touch. Huschke describes 12 a somewhat different yet allied gesture, which he says is exhibited by persons when astonished. They hold themselves erect, with the fea- tures as before described, but with the straightened arms extended backwards — the stretched fingers being separated from each other. I have never myself seen this gesture; but Huschke is probably correct; for a friend asked another man how he would express great astonishment, and he at once threw himself into this attitude. These gestures are, I believe, explicable on the prin- 11 Lieber, 1 On the Vocal Sounds,' &c, ibid. p. 7. 12 Huschke, 'Mimiees et Physiognomices/ 1821, p. 18. Gratiolet (De la Phys. p. 255) gives a figure of a man in this attitude, which, however, seems to me expressive of fear combined witli astonishment. Le lirun also refers (Lavater, vol. ix. p. 2D9; to the hands of an astonished man being opened. 288 ASTONISHMENT. Chap. XII. ciple of antithesis. We have seen that an indignant man holds his head erect, squares his shoulders, turns out his elbows, often clenches his fist, frowns, and closes his mouth ; whilst the attitude of a helpless man is in every one of these details the reverse. Now, a man in an ordinary frame of mind, doing nothing and thinking of nothing in particular, usually keeps his two arms sus- pended laxly by his sides, with his hands somewhat flexed, and the fingers near together. Therefore, to raise the arms suddenly, either the whole arms or the fore-arms, to open the palms flat, and to separate the fingers, — or, again, to straighten the arms, extending them backwards with separated fingers, — are move- ments in complete antithesis to those preserved under an indifferent frame of mind, and they are, in conse- quence, unconsciously assumed by an astonished man. There is, also, often a desire to display surprise in a conspicuous manner, and the above attitudes are well fitted for this purpose. It may be asked why should surprise, and only a few other states of the mind, be exhibited by movements in antithesis to others. But this principle will not be brought into play in the case of those emotions, such as terror, great joy, suffering, or rage, which naturally lead to certain lines of action and produce certain effects on the body, for the whole system is thus preoccupied ; and these emotions are already thus expressed with the greatest plainness. There is another little gesture, expressive of astonish- ment, of which I can offer no explanation; namely, the hand being placed over the mouth or on some part of the head. This has b?en observed with so many races of man, that it must have some natural origin. A wild Australian was taken into a large room full of official papers, which surprised him greatly, and he Chap. XII. FEAR. 289 cried out, cluck, cluck, cluck, putting the back of his hand towards his lips. Mrs. Barber says that the Kafirs and Fingoes express astonishment by a serious look and by placing the right hand upon the mouth, uttering the word mawo, which means ' wonderful.' The Bush- men are said 13 to put their right hands to their necks, bending their heads backwards. Mr. Winwood Reade has observed that the negroes on the West Coast of Africa, when surprised, clap their hands to their mouths, saying at the same time, " My mouth cleaves to me," t. e. to my hands ; and he has heard that this is their usual gesture on such occasions. Captain Speedy informs me that the Abyssinians place their right hand to the fore- head, with the palm outside. Lastly, Mr. Washington Matthews states that the conventional sign of astonish- ment with the wild tribes of the western parts of the United States " is made by placing the half-closed hand " over the mouth ;' in doing this, the head is often bent " forwards, and words or low groans are sometimes " uttered." Catlin 14 makes the same remark about the hand being pressed over the mouth by the Mandans and other Indian tribes. Admiration. — Little need be said on this head. Ad- miration apparently consists of surprise associated with some pleasure and a sense of approval. When vividly felt, the eyes are opened and the eyebrows raised ; the eyes become bright, instead of remaining blank, as under simple astonishment ; and the mouth, instead of gaping open, expands into a smile. Fear, Terror. — The word ' fear ' seems to be derived 13 Huschke, ibid. p. 18. 14 ' North American Indians,' 3rd edit. 1842, vol. i. p. 105. 290 FEAR. Chap. XII. from what is sudden and dangerous ; 15 and that of terror from the trembling of the vocal organs and body. I use the word ' terror ' for extreme fear ; but some writers think it ought to be confined to cases in which the imagination is more particularly concerned. Fear is often preceded by astonishment, and is so far akin to it, that both lead to the senses of sight and hearing being instantly aroused. In both cases the eyes and mouth are widely opened, and the eyebrows raised. The frightened man at first stands like a statue mo- tionless and breathless, or crouches down as if instinc- tively to escape observation. The heart beats quickly and violently, so that it pal- pitates or knocks against the ribs; but it is very doubt- ful whether it then works more efficiently than usual, so as to send a greater supply of blood to all parts of the body ; for the skin instantly becomes pale, as during incipient faintness. This paleness of the surface, how- ever, is probably in large part, or exclusively, due to the vaso-motor centre being affected in such a manner as to cause the contraction of the small arteries of the skin. That the skin is much affected under the sense of great fear, we see in the marvellous and inexplicable manner in which perspiration immediately exudes from it. This exudation is all the more remarkable, as the surface is then cold, and hence the term a cold sweat ; whereas, the sudorific glands are properly excited into action when the surface is heated. The hairs also on the skin stand erect; and the superficial muscles shiver. In connection with the disturbed ^action of the heart, the breathing is hurried. The salivary glands act im- 15 H. Wedgwood, Diet, of English Etymology, vol. ii. 1862, p. 35. See, also, Gratiolet (' De la Physiononrie,' p. 135) on the sources of fcucb words as ' terror, horror, rigidus, frigidus,' &c. Chap. XII. FEAR. 291 perfectly ; the mouth becomes dry, 16 and is often opened and shut. I have also noticed that under slight fear there is a strong tendency to yawn. One of the best- marked symptoms is the trembling of all the muscles of the body ; and this is often first seen in the lips. From this cause, and from the dryness of the mouth, the voice becomes husky or indistinct, or may alto- gether fail. " Obstupui, steteruntque comae, et vox " faucibus haesit." Of vague fear there is a well-known and grand de- scription in Job : — " In thoughts from the visions of the " night, when deep sleep falleth on men, fear came upon " me, and trembling, which made all my bones to shake. " Then a spirit passed before my face ; the hair of my " flesh stood up. It stood still, but I could not discern " the form thereof : an image was before my eyes, there " was silence, and I heard a voice, saying, Shall mortal " man be more just than God? Shall a man be more " pure than his Maker ?" (Job iv. 13.) As fear increases into an agony of terror, we behold, as under all violent emotions, diversified results. The heart beats wildly, or may fail to act and faintness ensue ; there is a death-like pallor ; the breathing is laboured ; the wings of the nostrils are widely dilated ; " there is a gasping and convulsive motion of the lips, a " tremor on the hollow cheek, a gulping and catching of " the throat ; " 17 the uncovered and protruding eye- balls are fixed on the object of terror ; or they may roll 10 Mr. Bain (' The Emotions and the Will,' 1865, p. 54) explains in the following manner the origin of the custom " of subjecting criminals " in India to the ordeal of the morsel of rice. The accused is made to " take a mouthful of rice, and after a little time to throw it out. If " the morsel is quite dry, the party is believed to be guilty, — his own " evil conscience operating to paralyse the salivating organs." 17 Sir C Bell, Transactions of Royal Phil. Soc. 1822, p. 308. ' Anatomy of Expression,' p. 88 and pp. 104-109. 292 FEAR. Chap. XII. restlessly from side to side, hue illuc volvens oculos totumque pererrat. 18 The pupils are said to be enor- mously dilated. All the muscles of the body may become rigid, or may be thrown into convulsive movements. The hands are alternately clenched and opened, often with a twitching movement. The arms may be protruded, as if to avert some dreadful danger, or may be thrown wildly over the head. The Eev. Mr. Hagenauer has seen this latter action in a terrified Australian. In other cases there is a sudden and un- controllable tendency to headlong flight ; and so strong is this, that the boldest soldiers may be seized with a sudden panic. As fear rises to an extreme pitch, the dreadful scream of terror is heard. Great beads of sweat stand on the skin. All the muscles of the body are relaxed. Utter prostration soon follows, and the mental powers fail. The intestines are affected. The sphincter muscles cease to act, and no longer retain the contents of the body. Dr. J. Crichton Browne has given me so striking an account of intense fear in an insane woman, aged thirty- five, that the description though painful ought not to be omitted. When a paroxysm seizes her, she screams out, " This is hell ! " " There is a black woman!" " I " can't get out ! " — and other such exclamations. When thus screaming, her movements are those of alternate tension and tremor. For one instant she clenches her hands, holds her arms out before her in a stiff semi- flexed position ; then suddenly bends her body forwards, sways rapidly to and fro, draws her fingers through her hair, clutches at her neck, and tries to tear off her 18 See Morcau on the rolling of the eyes, in the edit, of 1820 of Lavater, tome iv. p. 263. Also, Gratiolet, De la Phys. p. 17. Chap. XII. FEAR. 293 clothes. The sterno-cleidomastoid muscles (which serve to bend the head on the chest) stand out pro- minently, as if swollen, and the skin in front of them is much wrinkled. Her hair, which is cut short at the back of her head, and is smooth when she is calm, now stands on end ; that in front being dishevelled by the movements of her hands. The countenance expresses great mental agony. The skin is flushed over the face and neck, down to the clavicles, and the veins of the forehead and neck stand out like thick cords. The lower lip drops, and is somewhat everted. The mouth is kept half open, with the lower jaw projecting. The cheeks are hollow and deeply furrowed in curved lines running from the wings of the nostrils to the corners of the mouth. The nostrils themselves are raised and ex- tended. The eyes are widely opened, and beneath them the skin appears swollen ; the pupils are large. The forehead is wrinkled transversely in many folds, and at the inner extremities of the eyebrows it is strongly fur- rowed in diverging lines, produced by the powerful and persistent contraction of the corrugators. Mr. Bell has also described 19 an agony of terror and of despair, which he witnessed in a murderer, whilst carried to the place of execution in Turin. " On each " side of the car the officiating priests were seated ; " and in the centre sat the criminal himself. It was " impossible to witness the condition of this unhappy " wretch without terror; and yet, as if impelled by " some strange infatuation, it was equally impossible " not to gaze upon an object so wild, so full of horror. " He seemed about thirty-five years of age ; of large " and muscular form ; his countenance marked by 19 ' Observations on Italy,' 1825, p. 48, as quoted in ' The Anatomy of Expression,' p. 168. 294 FEAR. Cuap. XII. " strong and savage features ; half naked, pale as death, " agonized with terror, every limb strained in anguish, " his hands clenched convulsively, the sweat^ breaking a out on his bent and contracted brow, he kissed in- " cessantly the figure of our Saviour, painted on the " flag which was suspended before him ; but with an " agony of wildness and despair, of which nothing ever " exhibited on the stage can give the slightest con- " ception." I will add only one other case, illustrative of a man utterly prostrated by terror. An atrocious murderer of two persons was brought into a hospital, under the mistaken impression that he had poisoned himself; and Dr. W. Ogle carefully watched him the next morning, while he was being handcuffed and taken away by the police. His pallor was extreme, and his prostration so great that he was hardly able to dress himself. His skin perspired : and his eyelids and head drooped so much that it was impossible to catch even a glimpse of his eyes. His lower jaw hung down. There was no contraction of any facial muscle, and Dr. Ogle is almost certain that the hair did not stand on end, for he ob- served it narrowly, as it had been dyed for the sake of concealment. With respect to fear, as exhibited by the various races of man, my informants agree that the signs are the same as with Europeans. They are displayed in an exaggerated degree with the Hindoos and natives of Ceylon. Mr. Geach has seen Malays when terrified turn pale and shake ; and Mr. Brough Smyth states that a native Australian " being on one occasion much " frightened, showed a complexion as nearly approach- " ing to what we call paleness, as can well be con- " ceived in the case of a very black man." Mr. Dyson Lacy has seen extreme fear shown in an Australian, Chap. XII. ERECTION OF THE HAIR. 295 by a nervous twitching of the hands, feet, and lips ; and by the perspiration standing on the skin. Many savages do not repress the signs of fear so much as Europeans; and they often tremble greatly. With the Kafir, Gaika says, in his rather quaint English, the shaking " of the body is much experienced, and the eyes " are widely open." With savages, the sphincter muscles are often relaxed, just as may be observed in much frightened dogs, and as I have seen with monkeys when terrified by being caught. The erection of the hair. — Some of the signs of fear deserve a little further consideration. Poets continual ly speak of the hair standing on end ; Brutus says to the ghost of Caesar, " that mak'st my blood cold, and my " hair to stare." And Cardinal Beaufort, after the murder of Gloucester exclaims, " Comb down his hair ; " look, look, it stands upright." As I did not feel sure whether writers of fiction might not have applied to man what they had often observed in animals, I begged for information from Dr. Crichton Browne with respect to the insane. He states in answer that he has repeatedly seen their hair erected under the influence of sudden and extreme terror. For instance, it is occa- sionally necessary to inject morphia under the skin of an insane woman, who dreads the operation extremely, though it causes very little pain ; for she believes that poison is being introduced into her system, and that her bones will be softened, and her flesh turned into dust. She becomes deadly pale ; her limbs are stiffened by a sort of tetanic spasm, and -her hair is partially erected on the front of the head. Dr. Browne further remarks that the bristling of the hair which is so common in the insane, is not always associated with terror. It is perhaps most frequently 296 •FEAR. Chap. XII. seen in chronic maniacs, who rave incoherently and have destructive impulses ; but it is during their paroxysms of violence that the bristling is most observable. The fact of the hair becoming erect under the influence both of rage and fear agrees perfectly with what we have seen * in the lower animals. Dr. Browne adduces several cases in evidence. Thus with a man now in the Asylum, before the recurrence of each maniacal paroxysm, " the hair " rises up from his forehead like the mane of a Shetland " pony." He has sent me photographs of two women, taken in the intervals between their paroxysms, and he adds with respect to one of these women, " that the " state of her hair is a sure and convenient criterion * of her mental condition." I have had one of these photographs copied, and the engraving gives, if viewed Fig. 19. From a photograph of an insane woman, to show the condition of her hair. from a little distance, a faithful representation of the original, with the exception that the hair appears rather too coarse and too much curled. The extraor- dinary condition of the hair in the insane is due, not Chap. XII. ERECTION OF THE HAIR. 297 only to its erection, but to its dryness and harshness, consequent on the subcutaneous glands failing to act. Dr. Bucknill has said 20 that a lunatic " is a lunatic to " his finger's ends ; " he might have added, and often to the extremity of each particular hair. Dr. Browne mentions as an empirical confirmation of the relation which exists in the insane between the state of their hair and minds, that the wife of a medical man, who has charge of a lady suffering from acute melancholia, with a strong fear of death, for herself, her husband and children, reported verbally to him the day before receiving my letter as follows, " I think " Mrs. will soon improve, for her hair is getting " smooth ; and I always notice that our patients get " better whenever their hair ceases to be rough and " uq manageable." Dr. Browne attributes the persistently rough condi- tion of the hair in many insane patients, in part to their minds being always somewhat disturbed, and in part to the effects of habit, — that is, to the hair being frequently and strongly erected during their many recurrent paroxysms. In patients in whom the bristling of the hair is extreme, the disease is generally per- manent and mortal ; but in others, in whom the brist- ling is moderate, as soon as they recover their health of mind the hair recovers its smoothness. In a previous chapter we have seen that with animals the hairs are erected by the contraction of minute, un- striped, and involuntary muscles, which run to each separate follicle. In addition to this action, Mr. J. Wood has clearly ascertained by experiment, as he informs me, that with man the hairs on the front of the head which slope forwards, and those on the back 20 Quoted by Dr. Maudsley, ' Body and Mind,' 1870, p. 41. 298 FEAR. Chap. XII. which slope backwards, are raised in opposite directions by the contraction of the occipito-frontalis or scalp muscle. So that this muscle seems to aid in the erec- tion of the hairs on the head of man, in the same manner as the homologous panniculus carnosus aids, or takes the greater part, in the erection of the spines on the backs of some of the lower animals. Contraction of the jplatysma myoides muscle. — This muscle is spread over the sides of the neck, extending downwards to a little beneath the collar-bones, and upwards to the lower part of the cheeks. A portion, called the risorius, is represented in the woodcut (M) fig. 2. The contraction of this muscle draws the corners of the mouth and the lower parts of the cheeks downwards and backwards. It produces at the same time divergent, longitudinal, prominent ridges on the sides of the neck in the young ; and, in old thin per- sons, fine transverse wrinkles. This muscle is some- times said not to be under the control of the will ; but almost every one, if told to draw the corners of his mouth backwards and downwards with great force, brings it into action. I have, however, heard of a man who can voluntarily act on it only on one side of his neck. Sir C. Bell 21 and others have stated that this muscle is strongly contracted under the influence of fear; and Duchenne insists so strongly on its importance in the expression of this emotion, that he calls it the muscle of fright. 22 He admits, however, that its con- traction is quite inexpressive unless associated with widely open eyes and mouth. He has given a pho- 21 * Anntomy of Expression,' p. 168. 22 Mecanisuie de la Phys. Humaine, Album, Legende xi. CHAP. XII. CONTRACTION OF THE PLATYSMA. 299 tograph (copied and reduced in the accompanying woodcut) of the same old man as on former occa- sions, with his eyebrows strongly raised, his mouth opened, and the platysma contracted, all by means Fig. 20. Terror, from a photograph by Dr. Duchenne. of galvanism. The original photograph was shown to twenty-four persons, and they were separately asked, without any explanation being given, what expression was intende d : twenty instantly answered, " intenso 300 FEAR. Chap. XII. " fright " or " horror ; " three said pain, and one ex- treme discomfort. Dr. Duchenne has given another photograph of the same old man, with the platysma contracted, the eyes and mouth opened, and the eye- brows rendered oblique, by means of galvanism. The expression thus induced is very striking (see Plate VII. fig. 2) ; the obliquity of the eyebrows adding the appear- ance of great mental distress. The original was shown to fifteen persons ; twelve answered terror or horror, and three agony or great suffering. From these cases, and from an examination of the other photographs given by Dr. Duchenne, together with his remarks thereon, I think there can be little doubt that the con- traction of the platysma does add greatly to the expres- sion of fear. Nevertheless this muscle ought hardly to be called that of fright, for its contraction is certainly not a necessary concomitant of this state of mind. A man may exhibit extreme terror in the plainest manner by death-like pallor, by drops of perspiration on his skin, and by utter prostration, with all the muscles of his body, including the platysma, completely re- laxed. Although Dr. Browne has often seen this muscle quivering and contracting in the insane, he has not been able to connect its action with any emotional con- dition in them, though he carefully attended to patients suffering from great fear. Mr. Nicol, on the other hand, has observed three cases in which this muscle appeared to be more or less permanently contracted under the influence of melancholia, associated with much dread ; but in one of these cases, various other muscles about the neck and head were subject to spas- modic contractions. Dr. W. Ogle observed for me in one of the London hospitals about twenty patients, just before they were put under the influence of chloroform for operations. pi, r/i. Chap. XII. CONTRACTION OF THE PLATYSMA. 301 They exhibited some trepidation, but no great terror. In only four of the cases was the platysma visibly contracted ; and it did not begin to contract until the patients began to cry. The muscle seemed to contract at the moment of each deep-drawn inspiration ; so that it is very doubtful whether the contraction depended at all on the emotion of fear. In a fifth case, the patient, who was not chloroformed, was much terrified ; and his platysma was more forcibly and persistently con- tracted than in the other cases. But even here there is room for doubt, for the muscle which appeared to be unusually developed, was seen by Dr. O^le to con- tract as the man moved his head from the pillow, after the operation was over. As I felt much perplexed why, in any case, a super- ficial muscle on the neck should be especially affected by fear, 1 applied to my many obliging correspon lents for information about the contraction of this muscle under other circumstances. It would be superfluous to give all the answers which I have received. They show that this muscle acts, often in a variable manner and degree, under many different conditions. It is violently contracted in hydrophobia, and in a somewhat less degree in lockjaw ; sometimes in a marked manner during the insensibility frum chloroform. Dr. W. Ogle observed two male patients, suffering from such diffi- culty in breathing, that the trachea had to be opened, and in botli the platysma was strongly contracted. One of these men overheard the conversation of the surgeons surrounding him, and when he was able to speak, declared that he had not been frightened. In some other cases of extreme difficulty of respiration, though not requiring tracheotomy, observed by Drs. Ogle and Langstaff, the platysma was not con- tracted. 302 FEAK. Chap. XII. Mr. J. Wood, who has studied with such care the muscles of the human body, as shown by his various publications, has often seen the platysma contracted in vomiting, nausea, and disgust; also in children and adults under the influence of rage, — for instance, in Irishwomen, quarrelling and brawling together with angry gesticulations. This may possibly have been due to their high and angry tones ; for I know a lady, an excellent musician, who, in singing certain high notes, always contracts her platysma. So does a young man, as I have observed, in sounding certain notes on the flute. Mr. J. Wood informs me that he has found the platysma best developed in persons with thick necks and broad shoulders ; and that in families inheriting these peculiarities, its development is usually associated with much voluntary power over the homo- logous occipito-frontalis muscle, by which the scalp can be moved. None of the foregoing cases appear to throw any light on the contraction of the platysma from fear ; but it is different, I think, with the following cases. The gentleman before referred to, who can voluntarily act on this muscle only on one side of his neck, is positive that it contracts on both sides whenever he is startled. Evidence has already been given showing that this muscle sometimes contracts, perhaps for the sake of opening the mouth widely, when the breathing is ren- dered difficult by disease, and during the deep inspira- tions of crying-fits before an operation. Now, when- ever a person starts at any sudden sight or sound, he instantaneously draws a deep breath; and thus the contraction of the platysma may possibly have become associated with the sense of fear. But. there is, I believe, a more efficient relation. The first sensation of fear, or the imagination of something dreadful, com- Chap. XII. DILATATION OF THE TUPILS. 303 monly excites a shudder. I Lave caught myself giving a little involuntary shudder at a painful thought, and I distinctly perceived that my platysma contracted ; so it does if I simulate a shudder. I have asked others to act in this manner ; and in some the muscle con- tracted, but not in others. One of my sons, whilst getting out of bed, shuddered from the cold, and, as he happened to have bis hand on his neck, he plainly felt that this muscle strongly contracted. He then voluntarily shuddered, as he had done on former occasions, but the platysma was not then affected. Mr. J. Wood has also several times observed this muscle contracting in patients, when stripped for exa- mination, and who were not frightened, but shivered slightly from the cold. Unfortunately I have not been able to ascertain whether, when the whole body shakes, as in the cold stage of an ague fit, the platysma con- tracts. But as it certainly often contracts during a shudder ; and as a shudder or shiver often accompanies the first sensation of fear, we have, I think, a clue to its action in this latter case. 23 Its contraction, however, is not an invariable concomitant of fear ; for it probably never acts under the influence of extreme, prostrating terror. Dilatation of the Pupils. — Gratiolet repeatedly insists 24 that the pupils are enormously dilated whenever terror is felt. I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of this statement, but have failed to obtain confirmatory 2t Duchenne takes, in fact, this view (ibid. p. 45), as he attributes the contraction of the platysma to the shivering of fear (frisson de lu peur); but ho elsewhere compares the action with that which causes thti hair of frightened quadrupeds to fctand erect ; and this Can hardly be considered as quite coirect 24 * De la Physionomie,' pp. 51, 25G, 346. 304 HORROR. Chap. XII. evidence, excepting in the one instance before given of an insane woman suffering from great fear. When writers of fiction speak of the eyes being widely dilated, I presume that they refer to the eyelids. Munro's state- ment, 25 that with parrots the iris is affected by the pas- sions, independently of the amount of light, seems to bear on this question ; but Professor Donders informs me, that he has often seen movements in the pupils of these birds which he thinks may be related to their power of accommodation to distance, in nearly the same manner as our own pupils contract when our eyes converge for near vision. Gratiolet remarks that the dilated pupils appear as if they were gazing into profound darkness. No doubt the fears of man have often been excited in the dark ; but hardly so often or so exclusively, as to account for a fixed and associated habit having thus arisen. It seems more probable, assuming that Gratiolet's state- ment is correct, that the brain is directly affected by the powerful emotion of fear and reacts on the pupils ; but Professor Donders informs me that this is an ex- tremely complicated subject. I may add, as possibly throwing light on the subjpct, that Dr. Fyffe, of Netley Hospital, has observed in two patients that the pupils were distinctly dilated during the cold stage of an ague fit. Professor Donders has also often seen dilatation of the pupils in incipient faintness. Horror. — The state of mind expressed by this term implies terror, and is in some cases almost synony- mous with it. Many a man must have felt, before the blessed discovery of chloroform, great horror at the thought of an impending surgical operation. He who dreads, as well as hates a man, will feel, as Milton As quoted in White's ' Gradation in Man.' p. 57. Chap. XII. HORROR. 305 uses the word, a horror of him. We feel horror if we see any one, for instance a child, exposed to some instant and crushing danger. Almost every one would experi- ence the same feeling in the highest degree in witness- ing a man being tortured or going to be tortured. In these cases there is no danger to ourselves ; but from the power of the imagination and of sympathy we put ourselves in the position. of the sufferer, and ft el som - thing akin to fear. Sir C. Bell remarks, 26 that "horror is full of energy ; " the body is in the utmost tension, not unnerved by " fear." It is, therefore, probable that horror would generally be accompanied by the strong contraction of the brows ; but as fear is one of the elements, the eyes and mouth would be opened, and the eyebrows would be raised, as far as the antagonistic action of the corrugators permitted this movement. Duchenne has * given a photograph 27 (fig. 21) of the same old man as before, with his eyes somewhat staring, the eyebrows partially rais d, and at the same time strongly con- tracted, the mouth opened, and the platysma in action ; all effected by the means of galvanism. He considers that the expression thus produced shows extreme terror with horrible pain or torture. A tortured man, as long as his sufferings allowed him to feel any dread for the future, would probably exhibit horror in an extreme degree. I have shown the original of this photograph to twenty- three persons of both sexes and various ages ; and thirteen immediately answered horror, great pain, torture, or agony ; three answered extreme fright ; so that sixteen answered nearly in accordance with Du- chenne's belief. Six, however, said anger, guided no 26 ' Anatomy of Expression,' p. 109. 2 ' ' Mecauisnie de la Physionomie,' Album, pi. 65, pp. 44, 45. - 14 306 HORROR. Chap. XII. doubt, by the strongly contracted brows, and overlooking •the peculiarly opened mouth. One said disgust. On the w hole, the evidence indicates that we have here a Fig. 21. Horror and Agony, copied from a photograph by Dr. Ducherme. fairly good representation of horror and agony. The photograph before referred to (PL VII. fig. 2) likewise exhibits horror; but in this the oblique eyebrows in- dicate great mental distress in place of energy. Chap. XII. CONCLUSION. 307 Horror is generally accompanied by various gestures, which differ in different individuals. Judging from pictures, the whole body is often turned away or shrinks ; or the arms are violently protruded as if to push away some dreadful object. The most frequent gesture, as far as can be inferred from the acting of persons who endeavour to express a vividly-imagined scene of horror, is the raising of both shoulders, with the bent arms pressed closely against the sides or chest. These movements are nearly the same with those commonly made when we feel very cold; and they are generally accompanied by a shudder, as well as by a deep expira- tion or inspiration, according as the chest happens at the time to be expanded or contracted. The sounds thus made are expressed by words like u~h or ugh. 2 * It is not, however, obvious why, when we feel cold or express a sense of horror, we press our bent arms against our bodies, raise our shoulders, and shudder. Conclusion. — I have now endeavoured to describe the diversified expressions of fear, in its gradations from mere attention to a start of surprise, into extreme terror and horror. Some of the signs may be accounted for through the principles of habit, association, and inheritance, — such as the wide opening of the mouth and eyes, with upraised eyebrows, so as to see as quickly as possible all around us, and to hear dis- tinctly whatever sound may reach our ears. For we have thus habitually prepared ourselves to discover and encounter any danger. Some of the other signs of fear may likewise be accounted for, at least in 28 See remarks to this effect by Mr. Wedgwood, in the Introduction to his ' Dictionary of English Etymology,' 2nd edit. 1872, p. xxxvii. lie shows by intermediate forms that the sounds here referred to have piobably given rise to many words, such as ugly huge, &c. 308 FEAR AND HORROR. Chap. XII. part, through these same principles. Men, during numberless generations, have endeavoured to escape from their enemies or danger by headlong flight, or by violently struggling with them ; and such great exertions will have caused the heart to beat rapidly, the breathing to be hurried, the chest to heave, and the nostrils to be dilated. As these exertions have often been prolonged to the last extremity, the final result will have been utter prostration, pallor, perspiration, trembling of all the muscles, or their complete relaxa- tion. And now, whenever the emotion of fear is strongly felt, though it may not lead to any exertion, the same results tend to reappear, through the force of inheritance and association. Nevertheless, it is probable that many or most of the above symptoms of terror, such as the beating of the heart, the trembling of the muscles, cold perspiration, &c, are in large part directly due to the disturbed or interrupted transmission of nerve-force from the cerebro-spinal system to various parts of the body, owing to the mind being so powerfully affected. We may confidently look to this cause, independently of habit and association, in such cases as the modified secretions of the intestinal caifel, and the failure of certain glands to act. With respect to the involuntary bristling of the hair, we have good reason to believe that in the case of animals this action, however it may have originated, serves, together with certain voluntary movements, to make them appear terrible to their enemies ; and as the same involuntary and voluntary actions are performed by animals nearly related to man, we are led to believe that man has retained through inheritance a relic of them, now become useless. It is certainly a remarkable fact, that the minute unstriped muscles, by which the hairs thinly scattered over man's almost naked body Jhap. XII. CONCLUSION. 309 are erected, should have been preserved to the present day ; and that they should still contract under the same emotions, namely, terror and rage, which cause the hairs to staud on end in the lower members of the Order to which man belongs. 310 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. CHAPTER XIII. Self-attention — Shame — Shyness — Modesty : Blushing. Nature of a blush — Inheritance — The parts of the body most affected — Blushing in the various races of man — Accompanying gestures — Confusion of mind — Causes of blushing — Self- attention, the fundamental element — Shyness — Shame, from broken moral laws and conventional rules — Modesty — Theory of blushing — Eecapitulation. Blushing is the most peculiar and the most tuman of all expressions. Monkeys redden from passion, but it would require an overwhelming amount of evidence to make us believe that any animal could blush. The red- dening of the face from a blush is due to the relaxation of the muscular coats of the small arteries, by which the capillaries become filled with blood ; and this de- pends on the proper vaso-motor centre being affected. No doubt if there be at the same time much mental agi- tation, the general circulation will be affected; but it is not due to the action of the heart that the network of minute vessels covering the face becomes under a sense of shame gorged with blood. We can cause laughing by tickling the skin, weeping or frowning by a blow, trembling from the fear of pain, and so forth ; but we cannot cause a blush, as Dr. Burgess remarks,^ by any physical means, — that is by any action on the body. It is the mind which must be affected. Blushing is not only involuntary; but the 1 ' The Physiology or Mechanism of flushing,' 1839, p. 156. I bhall have occasion often to quote this work in the present chapter. Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 311 wish to restrain it, by leading to self-attention actuall) increases the tendency. The young blush much more freely than the old, but not during infancy, 2 which is remarkable, as we know that infants at a very early age redden from passion. I have received authentic accounts of two little girls blushing at the ages of between two and three years ; and of another sensitive child, a year older, blushing, when reproved for a fault. Many children, at a somewhat more advanced age blush in a strongly marked manner. It appears that the mental powers of infants are not as yet sufficiently developed to allow of their blushing. Hence, also, it is that idiots rarely blush. Dr. Crichton Browne observed for me those under his care, but never saw a genuine blush, though he has seen their faces flush, apparently from joy, when food was placed before them, and from anger. Nevertheless some, if not utterly degraded, are capable of blushing. A microcephalous idiot, for in- stance, thirteen years old, whose eyes brightened a little when he was pleased or amused, has been de- scribed by Dr. Behn, 3 as blushing and turning to one side, when undressed for medical examination. Women blush much more than men. It is rare to see an old man, but not nearly so rare to see an old woman blushing. The blind do not escape. Laura Bridgman, borri in this condition, as well as completely deaf, blushes. 4 The Rev. B. H. Blair, Principal of the Worcester College, informs me that three children • 2 Dr. Burgess, ibid. p. 56. At p. 33 he also remarks on women blushing more freely than men, as stated below. 3 Quoted by Vogt, ' Me'moire sur les Microcephales,' 18G7, p. 20. Dr. Burgess (ibid. p. 56) doubts whether idiots ever blush. 4 Lieber 'On the Vocal Sounds,' &c. ; Smithsonian Contribu.ions, 1851, vol. ii. p. G. 812 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. born blind, out of seven or eight then in the Asylum, are great blushers. The blind are not at first conscious that they are observed, and it is a most important part of their education, as Mr. Blair informs me, to impress this knowledge on their minds ; and the im- pression thus gained would greatly strengthen the ten- dency to blush, by increasing the habit of self-attention. The tendency to blush is inherited. Dr. Burgess gives the case 5 of a family consisting of a father, mother, and ten children, all of whom, without excep- tion, were prone to blush to a most painful degree. The children were grown up ; " and some of them were " sent to travel in order to wear away this diseased " sensibility, but nothing was of the slightest avail/' Even peculiarities in blushing seem to be inherited. Sir James Paget, whilst examining the spine of a girl, was struck at her singular manner of blushing; a big splash of red appeared first on one cheek, and then other splashes, variously scattered over the face and neck. He subsequently asked the mother whether her daughter always blushed in this peculiar manner ; and was answered, u Yes, she takes after me." Sir J. Paget then perceived that by asking this question he had caused the mother to blush ; and she exhibited the same peculiarity as her daughter. In most cases the face, ears and neck are the sole parts which redden ; but many persons, whilst blushing intensely, feel that their whole bodies grow hot and tingle ; and this shows that the entire surface must be in some manner affected. Blushes are said sometimes to commence on the forehead, but more commonly on the cheeks, afterwards spreading to the ears and neck. 6 In two Albinos examined by Dr. Burgess, the blushes 5 Ibid. p. 182. 6 Moreau, in edit, of 1820 of Lavater, vol. iv. p. 303. Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 313 commenced by a small circumscribed spot on the cheeks, over the parotidean plexus of nerves, and then increased into a circle ; between this blushing circle and the blush on the neck there was an evident line of demar- cation ; , although both arose simultaneously. The retina, which is naturally red in the Albino, invariably increased at the same time in redness. 7 Every one must have noticed how easily after one blush fresh blushes chase each other over the face. Blushing is preceded by a peculiar sensation in the skin. According to Dr. Burgess the reddening of the skin is generally succeeded by a slight pallor, which shows that the capil- lary vessels contract after dilating. -In some rare cases paleness instead of redness is caused under conditions which would naturally induce a blush. For instance, a young lady told me that in a large and crowded party she caught her hair so firmly on the button of a passing servant, that it took some time before she could be extricated ; from her sensations she imagined that she had blushed crimson ; but was assured by a friend that she had turned extremely pale. I was desirous to learn how far down the body blushes extend ; and Sir J. Paget, who necessarily has frequent opportunities for observation, has kindly at- tended to this point for me during two or three years. He finds that with women who blush intensely on the face, ears, and nape of neck, the blush does not com- monly extend any lower down the body. It is rare to see it as low down as the collar-bones and shoulder-blades ; and he has never himself seen a single instance in which it extended below the upper part of the chest. He has also noticed that blushes sometimes die away down- wards, not gradually and insensibly, but by irregular 7 Burgess, ibid. p. 38, on paleness after blushing, p. 177 314 BLUSHING. Cuap. XIII. ruddy blotches. Dr. Langstaff has likewise observed for me several worn en whose bodies did not in the least redden while their faces were crimsoned with blushes. With the insane, some of whom appear to be particularly- liable to blushing, Dr. J. Crichton Browne has several times seen the blush extend as far down as the collar- bones, and in two instances to the breasts. He gives me the case of a married woman, aged twenty-seven, who suffered from epilepsy. On the morning after her arrival in the Asylum, Dr. Browne, together with his assistants, visited her whilst she was in bed. The mo- ment that he approached, she blushed deeply over her cheeks and temples ; and the blush spread quickly to her ears. She was much agitated and tremulous. He unfastened the collar of her chemise in order to ex- amine the state of her lungs; and then a brilliant blush rushed over her chest, in an arched line over the upper third of each breast, and extended downwards between the breasts nearly to the ensiform cartilage of the sternum. This case is interesting, as the blush did not thus extend downwards until it became intense by her attention being drawn to this part of her person. As the examination proceeded she became composed, and the blush disappeared ; but on several subsequent occasions the same phenomena were observed. The foregoing facts show that, as a general rule, with English women, blushing does not extend beneath the neck and upper part of the chest. Nevertheless Sir J. Paget informs me that he has lately heard of a case, on which he can fully rely, in which a little girl, shocked by what she imagined to be an act of indelicacy, blushed all over her abdomen and the upper parts of her legs. Moreau also 8 relates, on the authority of a celebrated 8 See Lavater, edit, of 1820, vol. iv. p. 303. Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 315 painter, that the chest, shoulders, arms, and whole body of a girl, who unwillingly consented to serve as a model, reddened when she was first divested of her clothes. It is a rather curious question why, in most cases the face, ears, and neck alone redden, inasmuch as the whole surface of the body often tingles and grows hot. This seems to depend, chiefly, on the face and adjoining parts of the skin having been habitually exposed to the air, light, and alternations of temperature, by which the small arteries not only have acquired the habit of readily dilating and contracting, but appear to have become unusually developed in comparison with other parts of the surface. 9 It is probably owing to this same cause, as M. Moreau and Dr. Burgess have remarked, that the face is so liable to redden under various circumstances, such as a fever-fit, ordinary heat, violent exertion, anger, a slight blow, &c. ; and on the other hand that it is liable to grow pale from cold and fear, and to be discoloured during pregnancy. The face is also particularly liable to be affected by cuta- neous complaints, by small-pox, erysipelas, &c. This view is likewise supported by the ^act that the men of certain races, who habitually go nearly naked, often blush over their arms and chests and even down to their waists. A lady, who is a great blusher, informs Dr. Crichton Browne, that when she feels ashamed or is agitated, she blushes over her face, neck, wrists, and hands, — that is, over all the exposed portions of her skin. Nevertheless it may be doubted whether the habitual exposure of the skin of the face and neck, and its consequent power of reaction under stimulants of all kinds, is by itself sufficient to -account 9 Burgess, ibid. pp. 114, 122. Moreau in Lavater, ibid. vol. iv. p. 293. 316 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. for the much greater tendency in English women of these parts than of others to blush ; for the hands are well supplied with nerves and small vessels, and have been as much exposed to the air as the face or neck, and yet the hands rarely blush. We shall presently see that the attention of the mind having been directed much more frequently and earnestly to the face than to any other part of the body, probably affords a suffi- cient explanation. Blushing in the various races of man. — The small vessels of the face become filled with blood, from the emotion of shame, in almost all the races of man, though in the very dark races no distinct change of colour can be perceived. Blushing is evident in all the Aryan nations of Europe, and to a certain extent with those of India. But Mr. Erskine has never noticed that the necks of the Hindoos are decidedly affected. With the Lepchas of Sikhim, Mr. Scott has often observed a faint blush on the cheeks, base of the ears, and sides of the neck, accompanied by sunken eyes and lowered head. This has occurred when he has detected them m a falsehood, or has accused them of ingratitude. The pale, sallow complexions of these men render a blush much more conspicuous than in most of the other natives of India. With the latter, shame, or it may be in part fear, is expressed, according to Mr. Scott, much more plainly by the head being averted or bent down, with the eyes wavering or turned askant, than by any change of colour in the skin. The Semitic races blush freely, as might have been expected, from their general similitude to the Aryans. Thus with the Jews, it is said in the Book of Jeremiah (chap. vi. 15), "Nay, they were not at all ashamed, " neither could they blush." Mrs. Asa Gray saw an Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 317 Arab managing his boat clumsily on the Nile, and when laughed at by his companions, " he blushed " quite to the back of his neck." Lady Duff Gordon remarks that a young Arab blushed on coming into her presence. 10 Mr. Swinhoe has seen the Chinese blushing, but he thinks it is rare; yet they have the expression "to " redden with shame." Mr. Geach informs me that the Chinese settled in Malacca and the native Malays of the interior both blush. Some of these people go nearly naked, and he particularly attended to the downward extension of the blush. Omitting the cases in which the face alone was seen to blush, Mr. Geach observed that the face, arms, and breast of a Chinaman, aged 24 years, reddened from shame; and with another Chinese, when asked why he had not done his work in better style, the whole body was similarly affected. In two Malays 11 he saw the face, neck, breast, and arms blushing; and in a third Malay (a Bugis) the blush extended down to the waist. The Polynesians blush freely. The Rev. Mr. Stack has seen hundreds of instances with the New Zea- landers. The following case is worth giving, as it relates to an old man who was unusually dark-coloured and partly tattooed. After having let his land to an Englishman for a small yearly rental, a strong passion seized him to buy a gig, which had lately become the fashion with the Maoris. He consequently wished to draw all the rent for four years from his tenant, and consulted Mr. Stack whether he could do so. The man 10 ' Letters from Egypt,' 1865, p. G6. Lady Gordon is mistaken when she says Malays and Mulattoes never blush. 11 Capt. Osborn (' Quedah,' p. 199), in speaking of a Malay whom he reproached for cruelty, says he was glad to see that the man blushed. 318 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. was old, clumsy, poor, and ragged, and the idea of his driving himself about in his carriage for display amused Mr. Stack so much that he could not help bursting out into a laugh ; and then " the old man blushed up to the " roots of his hair." Forster says that " you may easily "distinguish a spreading blush" on the cheeks of the fairest women in Tahiti. 12 The natives also of several of the other archipelagoes in the Pacific have been seen to blush. Mr. Washington Matthews has often seen a blush on the faces of the young squaws belonging to various wild Indian tribes of North America. At the opposite extremity of the continent in Tierra del Fuego, the natives, according to Mr. Bridges, " blush much, but " chiefly in regard to women ; but they certainly blush " also at their own personal appearance." This latter statement agrees witli what I remember of the Fuegian, Jemmy Button, who blushed when he was quizzed about the care which he took in polishing his shoes, and in otherwise adorning himself. With respect to the Ay- mara Indians on the lofty plateaus of Bolivia, Mr. Forbes says, 13 that from the colour of their skins it is impossible that their blushes should be as clearly 12 J. K. Forster, ' Observations during a Voyage round the World,' 4to, 1778, p. 229. Waitz gives (' Introduction to Anthropology,' Eng. translat. 1863, vol. i. p. 135) references for other islands in the Pacific. See, also, Dampier 4 On the Blushing of the Tunquinese ' (vol. ii. p. 40) ; but I have not consulted this work. Waitz quotes Bergmauu, that the Kalmucks do not blush, but this may be doubted after what we have seen with respect to the Chinese. He also quotes Both, who denies that the Abyssinians are capable of blushing. Unfortunately, Capt. Speedy, who lived so long with the Abyssinians, has not answered my inquiry on this head. Lastly, I must add that the Kajah Brooke has never observed the least sign of a blush with the Dyaks of Borneo ; on the contrary, under circumstances which would excite a blush in us, they assert " that they feel the blood drawn from their faces.'' 13 Transact, of the Ethnological Soc. 1870, vol. ii. p. 16. Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 319 visible as in the white races ; still under such circum- stances as would raise a blush in us, " there can always " be seen the same expression of modesty or confusion ; " and even in the dark, a rise of temperature of the " skin of the face can be felt, exactly as occurs in the "European." With the Indians who inhabit the hot, equable, and damp parts of South America, the skin apparently does not answer to mental excitement so readily as with the natives of the northern and southern parts of the continent, who have long been exposed to great vicissitudes of climate ; for Humboldt quotes without a protest the sneer of the Spaniard, " How can " those be trusted, who know not how to blush ?" 14 Von Spix and Martius, in speaking of the aborigines of Brazil, assert that they cannot properly be said to blush ; " it was only after long intercourse with the " whites, and after receiving some education, that we u perceived in the Indians a change of colour express- " ive of the emotions of their minds." 15 It is, however, incredible that the power of blushing could have thus originated ; but the habit of self-attention, consequent on their education and new course of life, would have much increased any innate tendency to blush. Several trustworthy observers have assured me that they have seen on the faces of negroes an appearance resembling a blush, under circumstances which would have excited one in us, though their skins were of an ebony-black tint. Some describe it as blushing brown, but most say that the blackness becomes more intense. An increased supply of blood in the skin seems in some manner to increase its blackness; thus certain exan- thematous diseases cause the affected places in the 14 Humboldt, ' Personal Narrative,' Eng. tmnslat. vol. iii. p. 229. 15 Quoted by Prichard, Phys. Hist, of Mankind, 4th edit. 1851, vol. i. p. 271. 320 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. negro to appear blacker, instead of, as with us, redder. 16 The skin, perhaps, from being rendered more tense by the filling of the capillaries, would reflect a somewhat different tint to what it did before. That the capil- laries of the face in the negro become filled with blood, under the emotion of shame, we may feel confident ; because a perfectly characterized albino negress, de- scribed by Buffon, 17 showed a faint tinge of crimson on her cheeks when she exhibited herself naked. Cica- trices of the skin remain for a long time white in the negro, and Dr. Burgess, who had frequent opportu- nities of observing a scar of this kind on the face of a negress, distinctly saw that it " invariably became red " whenever she was abruptly spoken to, or charged with "any trivial offence." 18 The blush could be seen pro- ceeding from the circumference of the scar towards the middle, but it did not reach the centre. Mulattoes are often great blushers, blush succeeding blush over their faces. From these facts there can be no doubt that negroes blush, although no redness is visible on the skin. I am assured by Gaika and by Mrs. Barber that the Kafirs of South Africa never blush ; but this may only mean that no change of colour is distinguishable. Gaika adds that under the circumstances which would make a European blush, his countrymen " look ashamed to " keep their heads up." 16 jSee, on this head, Burgess, ibid. p. 32. Also Waitz, 4 Introduc- tion to Anthropology,' Eng. edit. vol. i. p. 135. Moreau gives a detailed account (• Lavater,' 1820, torn. iv. p. 302) of the blushing of a Mada- gascar negress-slave when forced by her brutal master to exhibit her naked bosom. 17 Quoted by Prichard, Phys. Hist, of Mankind, 4th edit. 1851, vol. i. p. 225. 18 Burge.ss, ibid. p. 31. On mulattoes blushing, see p. 33. I have received similar accounts with respect to mulattoes. Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 321 It is asserted by four of my informants that the Australians, who are almost as black as negroes, never blush. A filth answers doubtfully, remarking that only a very strong blush could be seen, on account of the dirty state of their skins. Three observers state that they do blush; 19 Mr. S. Wilson adding that this is noticeable only under a strong emotion, and when the skin is not too dark from long exposure and want of cleanliness. Mr. Lang answers, " I have "noticed that shame almost always excites a blush, which frequently extends as low as the neck." Shame is also shown, as he adds, "by the eyes being turned " from side to side." As Mr. Lang was a teacher in a native school, it is probable that he chiefly observed children ; and we know that they blush more than adults. Mr. G. Taplin has seen half-castes blushing, and he says that the aborigines have a word expressive of shame. Mr. Hagenauer, who is one of those who has never observed the Australians to blush, says that he has " seen them looking down to the ground on " account of shame ;" and the missionary, Mr. Bulmer, remarks that though " I have not been able to detect " anything like shame in the adult aborigines, 1 have " noticed that the eyes of the children, when ashann d, " present a restless, watery appearance, as if they did " not know where to look." r lhe facts now given are sufficient to show that blush- ing, whether or not there is any change of colour, is common to most, probably to all, of the races of man. Movements and gestures which accompany Blushing. — Under a keen sense of shame there is a strong desire 10 Barrington also says that the Australians of New South Wales blush, as quoted by Waitz, ibid. p. 130. 322 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. for concealment. 20 We turn away the whole body, more especially the face, which we endeavour in some manner to hide. An ashamed person can hardly endure to meet the gaze of those present, so that he almost invariably casts down his eyes or looks askant. As there generally exists at the same time a strong wish to avoid the appearance of shame, a vain attempt is made to look direct at the person who causes this feeling ; and the antagonism between these opposite tendencies leads to various restless movements in the eyes. I have noticed two ladies who, whilst blushing, to which they are very liable, have thus acquired, as it ap- pears, the oddest trick of incessantly blinking their eyelids with extraordinary rapidity. An intense blush is sometimes accompanied by a slight effusion of tears; 21 and this, I presume, is due to the lacrvmal glands partaking of the increased supply of blood, which we know rushes into the capillaries of the adjoin- ing parts, including the retina. Many writers, ancient and modern, have noticed the foregoing movements; and it has already been shown that the aborigines in various parts of the world often exhibit their shame by looking downwards or askant, or by restless movements of their eyes. Ezra cries out (ch. ix. 6), " 0, my God ! I am ashamed, and blush to " lift up my head to thee, my God." In Isaiah (ch. 1. 20 Mr. Wedgwood says (Diet, of English Etymology, vol. iii. 1865, p. 155) that the word shame " may well originate in the idea of shade " or concealment, and may be illustrated by the Low German scheme, " shade or shadow." Gratiolet (De la Phys. pp. 357-362; has a good discussion on the gestures accompanying shame ; but some of his re- marks seem to me rather fanciful. See, also, Burgess (ibid. pp. 69, 134) on the same subject. 21 Burgess, ibid. pp. 181, 182. Boerhaave also noticed (as quoted by Gratiolet, ibid. p. 361) the tendency to the secretion of tears during intense blushing. Mr. Buhner, as we have seen, speaks of the "watery eyed " of the children of the Australian aborigines when ashamed. • Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 323 6) we meet with the words, " I hid not my face from " shame." Seneca remarks (Epist. xi. 5) " that the " Koman players hang down their heads, fix their eyes " on the ground and keep them lowered, but are unable " to blush in acting shame." According to Macrobius, who lived in the fifth century ('Saturnalia,' b. vii. c. 11), " Natural philosophers assert that nature being moved " by shame spreads the blood before herself as a veilj " as we see any one blushing often puts his hands before " his face." Shakspeare makes Marcus (' Titus An- dronicus,' act ii. sc. 5) say to his niece, "Ah! now " thou turn'st away thy face for shame." A lady informs me that she found in the Lock Hospital a girl whom she had formerly known, and who had become a wretched castaway, and the poor creature, when approached, hid her face under the bed-clothes, and could not be persuaded to uncover it. We often see little children, when shy or ashamed, turn away, and still standing up, bury their faces in their mother's gown; or they throw themselves face downwards on her lap. Confusion of mind. — Most persons, whilst blushing intensely, have their mental powers confused. This is recognized in such common expressions as " she " was covered with confusion." Persons in this con- dition lose their presence of mind, and utter singularly inappropriate remarks. They are often much distressed, stammer, and make awkward movements or strange grimaces. In certain cases involuntary twitchings of some of the facial muscles may be observed. I have been informed by a young lady, who blushes excessively, that at such times she does not even know what she is saying. When it was suggested to her that this might be due to her distress from the consciousness that her 324 BLUSHINU. Chap. XIII. blushing was noticed, she answered that this could not be the case, " as she had sometimes felt quite " as stupid when blushing at a thought in her own " room." I will give an instance of the extreme disturbance of mind to which some sensitive men are liable. A gentleman, on whom I can rely, assured me that he had been an eye-witness of the following scene : — A small dinner-party was given in honour of an extremely shy man, who, when he rose to return thanks, rehearsed the speech, which he had evidently learnt by heart, in absolute silence, and did not utter a single word; but he acted as if he were speaking with much emphasis. His friends, perceiving how the case stood, loudly applauded the imaginary bursts of eloquence, whenever his ges- tures indicated a pause, and the man never discovered that he had remained the whole time completely silent. On the contrary, he afterwards remarked to my friend, with much satisfaction, that he thought he had succeeded uncommonly well. When a person is much ashamed or very shy, and blushes intensely, his heart beats rapidly and his breathing is disturbed. This can hardly fail to affect the circulation of the blood within the brain, and per- haps the mental powers. It seems however doubtful, judging from the still more powerful influence of anger and fear on the circulation, whether we can thus satis- factorily account for the confused state of mind in persons whilst blushing intensely. The true explanation apparently lies in the intimata sympathy which exists between the capillary circula- tion of the surface of the head and face, and that of the brain. On applying to Dr. J. Crichton Browne for information, he has given me various facts bearing on this subject. When the sympathetic nerve is divided Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 325 on one side of tbe head, the capillaries on this side are relaxed and become filled with blood, causing the skin to redden and to grow hot, and at the same time the temperature within the cranium on the same side rises. Inflammation of the membranes of the brain leads to the engorgement of the face, ears, and eyes with blood. The first stage of an epileptic fit appears to be the contraction of the vessels of the brain, and the first outward manifestation is an extreme pallor of countenance. Erysipelas of the head commonly in- duces delirium. Even the relief given to a severe headache by burning the skin with strong lotion, depends, I presume, on the same principle. Dr. Browne has often administered to his patients the vapour of the nitrite of amyl, 22 which has tbe sin- gular property of causing vivid redness of the face in from thirty to sixty seconds. This flushing re- sembles blushing in almost every detail : it begins at several distinct points on the face, and spreads tilt it involves the whole surface of the head, neck, and front of the chest ; but has been observed to extend only in one case to the abdomen. The arteries in the retina become enlarged ; the eyes glisten, and in one instance there was a slight effusion of tears. The patients are at first pleasantly stimulated, but, as the flushing increases, they become confused and bewildered. One woman to whom the vapour had often been administered asserted that, as soon as she grew hot, she grew muddled. With persons just commencing to blush it appears, judging from their bright eyes and lively behaviour, that their mental powers are somewhat stimulated. It is only when the blushing is excessive that the mind grows 22 See also Dr. J. Crichton Browne's Memoir on this subject in. t&o West Kiding Lunatic Asylum Medical Keport,' 1871, pp. 95-98. 326 BLUSHING. Chap. XIIi. confused. Therefore it would seem that the capillaries of the face are affected, both during the inhalation of the nitrite of amyl and during blushing, before that part of the brain is affected on which the mental powers depend. Conversely when the brain is primarily affected, the circulation of the skin is so in a secondary manner. Dr. Browne has frequently observed, as he informs me, scattered red blotches and mottlings on the chests of epileptic patients. In these cases, when the skin on the thorax or abdomen is gently rubbed with a pencil or other object, or, in strongly-marked cases, is merely touched by the finger, the surface becomes suffused in less than half a minute with bright red marks, which spread to some distance on each side of the touched point, and persist for several minutes. These are the cerebral maculse of Trousseau; and they indicate, as Dr. Browne remarks, a highly modified condition of the cutaneous vascular system. If, then, there exists, as cannot be doubted, an intimate sympathy between the capillary circulation in that part of the brain on which our mental powers depend, and in the skin of the face, it is not surprising that the moral causes which induce intense blushing should likewise induce, independently of their own disturbing influence, much confusion of mind. The Nature of the Mental States which induce Blush- ing. — These consist of shyness, shame, and modesty; the essential element in all being self-attention. Many reasons can be assigned for believing that originally self-attention directed to personal appearance, in relation to the opinion of others, was the exciting cause ; the same effect being subsequently produced, through the force of association, by self-attention in relation to moral conduct. It is not the simple act of reflecting ClIAP. XIII. BLUSHING. 327 on our own appearance, but the thinking what others think of us, which excites a blush. In absolute solitude the most sensitive person would be qu.te indifferent about his appearance. We feel blame or disapprobation more acutely than approbation ; and consequently depreciatory remarks or ridicule, whether of our appearance or conduct, causes us to blush much more readily than does praise. But undoubtedly praise and admiration are highly efficient : a. pretty girl blushes when a man gazes intently at her, though she may know perfectly well that he is not depreciating her. Many children, as well as old and sensitive per- sons blush, when they are much praised. Hereafter the question will be discussed, how it has arisen that the consciousness that others are attending to our personal appearance should have led to the capillaries, espe- cially those of the face, instantly becoming filled with blood. My reasons for believing that attention directed to personal appearance, and not to moral conduct, has been the fundamental element.in the acquirement of the habit of blushing, will now be given. They are separately light, but combined possess, as it appears to me, con- siderable weight. It is notorious that nothing makes a shy person blush so much as any remark, however slight, on his personal appearance. One cannot notice even the dress of a woman much given to blushing, without causing her face to crimson. It is sufficient to stare hard at some persons to make them, as Cole- ridge remarks, blush, — " account for that he who " can." 23 With the two albinos observed by Dr. Burgess, 24 23 In a discussion on so-called animal magnetism in ' Table Talk,' vol. i. 24 Ibid. p. 40. 328 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. " the slightest attempt to examine their peculiarities " invariably" caused them to blush deeply. Women are much more sensitive about their personal -appearance than men are, especially elderly women in comparison with elderly men, and they blush much more freely. The young of both sexes are much more sensitive on this same head than the old, and they also blush much more freely than the old. Children at a very early age do not blush ; nor do they show those other signs of self-consciousness which generally accompany blush- ing; and it is one of their chief charms that they think nothing about what others think of them. At this early age they will stare at a stranger with a fixed gaze and unblinking eyes, as on an inanimate object, in a manner which we elders cannot imitate. It is plain to every one that young men and women are highly sensitive to the opinion of each other with reference to their personal appearance; and they blush incomparably more in the presence of the opposite sex than in that of their own. 25 A young man, not very liable to blush, will blush intensely at any slight ridicule of his appearance from a girl whose judgment on any important subject he would disregard. No happy pair of young lovers, valuing each other's admiration and love more than anything else in the world, probably ever courted each other without many a blush. Even the barbarians of Tierra del Fuego, according to Mr. Bridges, blush " chiefly in regard to u women, but certainly also at their own personal " appearance." Of all parts of the body, the face is most considered _ — _ 25 Mr. Bam (' The Emotions and the Will,' 1865, p. 65) remarks on " the shyness of manners which is induced between the sexes .... u from the influence of mutual regard, by the apprehension on either " side of not standing well with the other." Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 329 and regarded, as is natural from its being the chief seat of expression and the source of the voice. It is also the chief seat of beauty and of ugliness, and throughout the world is the most ornamented. 26 The face, there- fore, will have been subjected during many generations to much closer and more earnest self-attention than any other part of the body ; and in accordance with the principle here advanced we can understand why it should be the most liable to blush. Although exposure to alternations of temperature, &c, has probably much increased the power of dilatation and contraction in the capillaries of the face and adjoining parts, yet this by itself will hardly account for these parts blushing much more than the rest of the body ; for it does not explain the fact of the hands rarely blushing. With Europeans the whole body tingles slightly when the face blushes intensely ; and with the races of men who habitually go nearly naked, the blushes extend over a much larger surface than with us. These facts are, to a certain extent, intelligible, as the self-attention of primeval man, as well as of the existing races which still go naked, will not have been so exclusively confined to their faces, as is the case with the people who now go clothed. We have seen that in all parts of the world persons who feel shame for some moral delinquency, are apt to avert, bend down, or hide their faces, independently of any thought about their personal appearance. The object can hardly be to conceal their blushes, for the face is thus averted or hidden under circumstances which exclude any desire to conceal shame, as when guilt is fully confessed and repented of. It is, however, probable that primeval man before he had acquired 28 See. for evidence on this subject, ' The Descent of Man/ &c., vol. ii. pp. 71, 341. 15 330 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. much moral sensitiveness would have been highly sen- sitive about his personal appearance, at least in refer- ence to the other sex, and he -would consequently have felt distress at any depreciatory remarks about his appearance ; and this is one form of shame. And as the face is the part of the body which is most regarded, it is intelligible that any one ashamed of his personal appearance would desire to conceal this part of his body. The habit having been thus acquired, would naturally be carried on when shame from strictly moral causes was felt ; and it is not easy otherwise to see why under these circumstances there should be a desire to hide the face more than any other part of the body. The habit, so general with every one who feels ashamed, of turning away, or lowering his eyes, or rest- lessly moving them from side to side, probably follows from each glance directed towards those present, bringing home the conviction that he is intently regarded; and he endeavours, by not looking at those present, and especially not at their eyes, momentarily to escape from this painful conviction. Shyness. — This odd state of mind, often called shamefacedness, or false shame, or mauvaise honte, ap- pears to be one of the most efficient of all the causes of blushing. Shyness is, indeed, chiefly recognized by the face reddening, by the eyes being averted or cast down, and by awkward, nervous movements of the body. Many a woman blushes from this cause, a hundred, perhaps a thousand times, to once that she blushes from having done anything deserving blame, and of which she is truly ashamed. Shyness seems to depend on sen- sitiveness to the opinion, whether good or bad, of others, more especially with respect to external appear- ance. Strangers neither know nor care anything about Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 331 our conduct or character, but they may, and often do, criticize our appearance : hence shy persons are particularly apt to be shy and to blush in the presence of strangers. The consciousness of anything peculiar, or even new, in the dress, or any slight blemish on the person, and more especially on the face — points which are likely to attract the attention of strangers — makes the shy intolerably shy. On the other hand, in those cases in which conduct and not personal appearance is con- cerned, we are much more apt to be shy in the presence of acquaintances, whose judgment we in some degree value, than in that of strangers. A physician told me that a young man, a wealthy duke, with whom he had travelled as medical attendant, blushed like a girl, when he paid him his fee ; yet this young man probably would not have blushed and been shy, had he been paying a bill to a tradesman. Some persons, however, are so sensitive, that the mere act of speaking to almost any one is sufficient to rouse their self-conscious- ness, and a slight blush is the result. Disapprobation or ridicule, from our sensitiveness on this head, causes shyness and blushing much more readily than does approbation ; though the latter with some persons is highly efficient. The conceited are rarely shy ; for they value themselves much too highly to expect depreciation. Why a proud man is often shy, as appears to be the case, is not so obvious, unless it be that, with all his self-reliance, he really thinks much about the opinion of others, although in a dis- dainful spirit. Persons who are exceedingly shy are rarely shy in the presence of those with whom they are quite familiar, and of whose good opinion and sympathy they are perfectly assured; — for instance, a girl in the presence of her mother. I neglected to inquire in my printed paper whether shyness can be detected 332 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. in the different races of man; but a Hindoo gentle- man assured Mr. Erskine that it is recognizable in his countrymen. Shyness, as the derivation of the word indicates in several languages, 27 is closely related to fear ; yet it is distinct from fear in the ordinary sense. A shy man no doubt dreads the notice of strangers, but can hardly be said to be afraid of them ; he may be as bold as a hero in battle, and yet have no self-confidence about trifles in the presence of strangers. Almost every one is extremely nervous when first addressing a public assembly, and most men remain so throughout their lives ; but this appears to depend on the consciousness of a great coming exertion, with its associated effects on the system, rather than on shyness; 28 although a timid or shy man no doubt suffers on such occasions infinitely more than another. With very young children it is difficult to distinguish between fear and shyness ; but this latter feeling with them has often seemed to me to partake of the character of the wildness of an untamed animal. Shyness comes on at a very early age. In one of my own children, when two years and three months old, I saw a trace of what certainly appeared to be shyness, directed towards myself after an absence from home of only a week. This was shown not by a blush, but by the eyes being for a few minutes slightly averted from me. I have noticed on other occasions that shyness or shamefacedness and real shame are exhibited in the eyes of young children before they have acquired the power of blushing. 27 H. Wedgwood, Diet. English Etymology, vol. iii. 1865, p. 184. So with the Latin word verecundus. 28 Mr. Bain (' The Emotions and the Will/ p. 64) has discussed the " abashed " feelings experienced on these occasions, as well as the stage-fright of actors unused to the stage. Mr. Bain apparently attri- butes these feelings to simple apprehension or dread. Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 333 As shyness apparently depends on self-attention, we can perceive how right are those who maintain that re- prehending children for shyness, instead of doing them any good, does much harm, as it calls their attention still more closely to themselves. It has been well urged that " nothing hurts young people more than to " be watched continually about their feelings, to have " their countenances scrutinized, and the degrees of their « " sensibility measured by the surveying eye of the un- " merciful spectator. Under the constraint of such " examinations they can think of nothing but that they " are looked at, and feel nothing but shame or appre- hension." 29 Moral causes : guilt. — With respect to blushing from strictly moral causes, we meet with the same funda- mental principle as before, namely, regard for the opinion of others. It is not the conscience which raises a blush, for a man may sincerely regret some slight fault committed in solitude, or he may suffer the deepest remorse for an undetected crime, but he will not blush. " I blush," says Dr. Burgess, 30 " in the presence " of my accusers." It is not the sense of guilt, but the thought that others think or know us to be guilty which crimsons the face. A man may feel thoroughly ashamed at having told a small falsehood, without blushing ; but if he even suspects that he is detected he will instantly blush, especially if detected by one whom he reveres. On the other hand, a man may be convinced that God witnesses all his actions, and he may feel deeply conscious of some fault and pray for forgiveness ; but 29 ' Essays on Practical Education/ by Maria and R. L. Edgeworth, new edit. vol. ii. 1822, p. 38. Dr. Burgess (ibid. p. 187) insists strongly to the same effect. 30 Ibid. p. 50. 334 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. this will not, as a lady who is a great blusher believes, ever excite a blush. The explanation of this difference between the knowledge by God and man of our actions lies, I presume, in man's disapprobation of immoral conduct being somewhat akin in nature to his depre- ciation of our personal appearance, so that through association both lead to similar results ; whereas the •disapprobation of God brings up no such association. Many a person has blushed intensely when accused of some crime, though completely innocent of it. Even the thought, as the lady before referred to has observed to me, that others think that Ave have made an unkind or stupid remark, is amply sufficient to cause a blush, although we know all the time that we have been com- pletely misunderstood. An action may be meritorious or of an indifferent nature, but a sensitive person, if he suspects that others take a different view of it, will blush. For instance, a lady by herself may give money to a beggar without a trace of a blush, but if others are present, and she doubts whether they approve, or suspects that they think her influenced by display, she will blush. So it will be, if she offers to relieve the distress of a decayed gentlewoman, more particularly of one whom she had previously known under better circumstances, as she cannot then feel sure how her conduct will be viewed. But such cases as these blend into shyness. Breaches of etiquette. — The rules of etiquette always refer to conduct in the presence of, or towards others. They have no necessary connection with the moral sense, and are often meaningless. Nevertheless as they depend on the fixed custom of our equals and superiors, whose opinion we highly regard, they are considered almost as binding as are the laws of honour to a Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 335 gentleman. Consequently the breach of the laws of etiquette, that is, any impoliteness or gaudier ie, any impropriety, or an inappropriate remark, though quite accidental, will cause the most intense blushing of which a man is capable. Even the recollection of such an act, after an interval of many years, will make the whole body to tingle. So strong, also, is the power of sympathy that a sensitive person, as a lady has assured me, will sometimes blush at a flagrant breach of etiquette by a perfect stranger, though the act may in no way concern her. Modesty. — This is another powerful agent in exciting blushes ; but the word modesty includes very different states of the mind. It implies humility, and we often judge of this by persons being greatly pleased and blushing at slight praise, or by being annoyed at praise which seems to them too high according to their own humble standard of themselves. Blushing here has tlje usual signification of regard for the opinion of others. But modesty frequently relates to acts of indelicacy ; and indelicacy is an affair of etiquette, as we clearly see with the nations that go altogether or nearly naked. He who is modest, and blushes easily at acts of this nature, does so because they are breaches of a firmly and wisely established etiquette. This is indeed shown by the derivation of the word modest from modus, a measure or standard of behaviour. A blush due to this form of modesty is, moreover, apt to be intense, because it generally relates to the opposite sex ; and we have seen how in all cases our liability to blush is thus in- creased. We apply the term 'modest,' as it would appear, to those who have an humble opinion of themselves, and to those who are extremely sensitive about an indelicate word or deed, simply because in both cases 33(3 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. blushes are readily excited, for these two frames of mind have nothing else in common. Shyness also, from this same cause, is often mistaken for modesty in the sense of humility. Some persons flush up, as I have observed and have been assured, at any sudden and disagreeable recol- lection. The commonest cause seems to be the sudden remembrance of not having done something for another person which had been promised. In this case it may be that the thought passes half unconsciously through the mind, " What will he think of me ?" and then the flush would partake of the nature of a true blush. But whether such flushes are in most cases due to the capillary circulation being affected, is very doubtful ; for we must remember that almost every strong emo- tion, such as anger or great joy, acts on the heart, and causes the face to redden. The fact that blushes may be excited in absolute solitude seems opposed to the view here taken, namely that the habit originally arose from thinking about what others think of us. Several ladies, who are great blushers, are unanimous in regard to solitude ; and some of them believe that they have blushed in the dark. From what Mr. Forbes has stated with respect to the Aymaras, and from my own sensations, I have no doubt that this latter statement is correct. Shakspeare, therefore, erred when he made Juliet, who was not even by herself, say to Borneo (act ii. sc. 2) : — " Thou know'st the mask of night is on my face ; Else would a maiden blush bepaint my cheek, For that which thou hast heard me speak to-night." But when a blush is excited in solitude, the cause almost always relates to the thoughts of others about us —to acts done in their presence, or suspected by them; Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 337 or again when we reflect what others would have thought of us had they known of the act. Nevertheless one or two of my informants believe that they have blushed from shame at acts in no way relating to others. If this be so, we must attribute the result to the force of inveterate habit and association, under a state of mind closely analogous to that which ordinarily excites a blush ; nor need we feel surprise at this, as even sym- pathy with another person who commits a flagrant breach of etiquette is believed, as we have just seen, sometimes to cause a blush. Finally, then, I conclude that blushing, — whether due to shyness — to shame for a real crime — to shame from a breach of the laws of etiquette — to modesty from humility — to modesty from an indelicacy — depends in all cases on the same principle ; this principle being a sensitive regard for the opinion, more particularly for the depreciation of others, primarily in relation to our personal appearance, especially of our faces ; and secondarily, through the force of association and habit, in relation to the opinion of others on our conduct. Theory of Blushing. — We have now to consider, why should the thought that others are thinking about us affect our capillary circulation? Sir C. Bell insists 31 that blushing " is a provision for expression, as may be " inferred from the colour extending only to the surface " of the face, neck, and breast, the parts most exposed. " It is not acquired ; it is from the beginning." Dr. Burgess believes that it was designed by the Creator in " order that the soul might have sovereign power of " displaying in the cheeks the various internal emotions 31 Bell, ' Anatomy of Expression,' p. 95. Burgess, as quoted below, ibid. p. 49. Gratiolet, Do la Pkys. p. 94. 338 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. " of the moral feelings; " so as to serve as a check on ourselves, and as a sign to others, that we were violating rules which ought to be held sacred. Gratiolet merely remarks, — "Or, comme il est dans l'ordre de la nature " que letre social le plus intelligent soit aussi le plus " intelligible, cette faculte de rougeur et de paleur qui " distingue l'homme, est un signe naturel de sa haute " perfection." The belief that blushing was specially designed by the Creator is opposed to the general theory of evolu- tion, which is now so largely accepted ; but it forms no part of my duty here to argue on the general ques- tion. Those who believe in design, will find it difficult to account for shyness being the most frequent and efficient of all the causes of blushing, as it makes the blusher to suffer and the beholder uncomfortable, with- out being of the least service to either of them. They will also find it difficult to account for negroes and other dark-coloured races blushing, in whom a change of colour in the skin is scarcely or not at all visible. No doubt a slight blush adds to the beauty of a maiden's face; and the Circassian women who are capable of blushing, invariably fetch a higher price in the seraglio of the Sultan than less susceptible women. 32 But the firmest believer in the efficacy of sexual selec- tion will hardly suppose that blushing was acquired as a sexual ornament. This view would also be opposed to what has just been said about the dark-coloured races blushing in an invisible manner. The hypothesis which appears to me the most pro- bable, though it may at first seem rash, is that atten- tion closely directed to any part of the body tends to 32 On the authority of Lady Mary Wortley Montague ; see Burgess, ibid. p. 43. Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 339 interfere with the ordinary and tonic contraction of the small arteries of that part. These vessels, in conse- quence, become at such times more or less relaxed, an I are instantly filled with arterial blood. This tendency will have been much strengthened, if frequent attention has been paid during many generations to the same part, owing to nerve-force readily flowing along accustomed channels, and by the power of inheritance. Whenever we believe that others are depreciating or even con- sidering our personal appearance, our attention is vividly directed to the outer and visible parts of our bodies; and of all such parts we are most sensitive about our faces, as no doubt has been the case during many past generations. Therefore, assuming for the moment that the capillary vessels can be acted on by close attention, those of the face will have become eminently susceptible. Through the force of associa- tion, the same effects will tend to follow whenever we think that others are considering or censuring our actions or character. As the basis of this theory rests on mental attention having some power to influence the capillary circula- tion, it will be necessary to give a considerable body of details, bearing more or less directly on this subject. Several observers, 33 who from their wide experience 33 In England, Sir H. Holland was, I believe, the first to consider the influence of mental attention on various parts of the body, in his ' Medical Note3 and Keflections,' 1839, p. 64. This essay, much en- larged, was reprinted by Sir H. Holland in his * Chapters on Mental Physiology,' 1858, p. 79, from which work I always quote. At neaily the same time, as well as subsequently, Prof. Laycock discussed the same subject : see ' Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal,' 18139, July, pp. 17-22. Also his ' Treatise on the Nervous Diseases of Women,' 1840, p. 110; and 'Mind and Brain,' vol. ii. 18G0, p. 5327. Dr. Car- penter's views on mesmerism have a nearly similar bearing. The great physiologist Muller treated (' Elements of Physiology,' Eng. translat. 340 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. and knowledge are eminently capable of forming a sound judgment, are convinced that attention or con- sciousness (which latter term Sir H. Holland thinks the more explicit) concentrated on almost any part of the body produces some direct physical effect on it. This applies to the movements of the involuntary muscles, and of the voluntary muscles when acting involuntarily, — to the secretion of the glands, — to the activity of the senses and sensations, — and even to the nutrition of parts. It is known that the involuntary movements of the heart are affected if close attention be paid to them. Gratiolet 34 gives the case of a man, who by continually watching and counting his own pulse, at last caused one beat out of every six to intermit. On the other hand, my father told me of a careful observer, who certainly had heart-disease and died from it, and who positively stated that his pulse was habitually irre- gular to an extreme degree ; yet to his great disap- pointment it invariably became regular as soon as my father entered the room. Sir H. Holland remarks, 35 that " the effect upon the circulation of a part from the " consciousness suddenly directed and fixed upon it, " is often obvious and immediate." Professor Lay cock, who has particularly attended to phenomena of this nature, 36 insists that " when the attention is directed " to any portion of the body, innervation and circula- " tion are excited locally, and the functional activity of " that portion developed." vol. ii. pp. 937, 1085) of the influence of the attention on the senses Sir J. Paget discusses the influence of the mind on the nutrition of parts, in his ' Lectures on Surgical Pathology,' 1853, vol. i. p. 39 : I quote from the 3rd edit, revised by Prof. Turner, 1870, p. 28, See, al-o, Gratiolet, De la Phys. pp. 283-287. 34 De la Phys. p. 283. 35 ' Chapters on Mental Physiology,' 1858, p. 111. 36 ' Mind and Brain,' vol. ii. 1310, p. 327. Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 341 It is generally believed that the peristaltic move- ments of the intestines are influenced by attention being paid to them at fixed recurrent periods ; and these movements depend on the contraction of unstriped and involuntary muscles. The abnormal action of the voluntary muscles in epilepsy, chorea, and hysteria is known to be influenced by the expectation of an attack, and by the sight of other patients similarly affected. 37 So it is with the involuntary acts of yawning and laughing. Certain glands are much influenced by thinking of them, or of the conditions under which they have been habitually excited. This is familiar to every one in the increased flow of saliva, when the thought, for in- stance, of intensely acid fruit is kept before the mind. 38 It was shown in our sixth chapter, that an earnest and long-continued desire either to repress, or to in- crease, the action of the lacrymal glands is effectual. Some curious cases have been recorded in the case of women, of the power of the mind on the mammary glands ; and still more remarkable ones in relation to the uterine functions. 39 37 1 Chapters on Mental Physiology,' pp. 104-106. 38 See Giratiolet on this subject, De la Phys. p. 287. 39 Dr. J. Crichton Browne, from his observations on the insane, is convinced that attention directed for a prolonged period on any part or organ may ultimately influence its capillary circulation and nutrition. He has given me some extraordinary cases ; one of these, whieh cannot here be related in full, refers to a married woman fifty years of age, who laboured under the firm and long-continued delusion that she was pregnant. When the expected period arrived, she acted pre- cisely as if she had been really delivered of a child, and seemed to surfer extreme pain, so that the perspiration broke out on her forehead. The result was that a state of things returned, continuing for three days, which had ceasid during the six previous years. Mr. Braid gives, in his ' Magic, Hypnotism,' &c, 1852, p. 95, and in his other works, analogous cases, as well as other facts s!. owing the great in- fluence of the will on the mammary glands, even on one breast alone. 342 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. When we direct our whole attention to any one sense, its acuteness is increased; 40 and the continued habit of close attention, as with blind people to that of hearing, and with the blind and deaf to that of touch, appears to improve the sense in question per- manently. There is, also, some reason to believe, judging from the capacities of different races of man, that the effects are inherited. Turning to ordinary sensations, it is well known that pain is increased by attending to it ; and Sir B. Brodie goes so far as to believe that pain may be felt in any part of the body to which attention is closely drawn. 41 Sir H. Holland also remarks that we become not only conscious of the existence of a part subjected to concentrated attention, but we experience in it various odd sensations, as of weight, heat, cold, tingling, or itching. 42 Lastly, some physiologists maintain that the mind can influence the nutrition of parts. Sir J. Paget has given a curious instance of the power, not in- deed of the mind, but of the nervous system, on the hair. A lady " who is subject to attacks of what is " called nervous headache, always % finds in the morning " after such an one, that some patches of her hair " are white, as if powdered with starch. The change " is effected in a night, and in a few days after, the " hairs gradually regain their dark brownish colour." 43 40 Dr. Maudsley has given (' The Physiology and Pathology of Mind,' 2nd edit. 1868, p. 105), on good authority, some curious statements with respect to the improvement of the sense of touch by practice and atten- tion. It is remarkable that when this sense has thus been rendered more acute at any point of the body, for instance, in a finger, it is likewise improved at the corresponding point on the opposite side of the body. 41 'The Lancet,' 1838, pp. 39-40, as quoted by Prof. Laycock, ' Nervous Diseases of Women,' 1840, p. 110. 42 ' Chapters on Mental Physiology,' 1858, pp. 91-93. 43 'Lectures on Surgical Pathology,' 3rd edit, revised by Prof. Turner, 1870, pp. 28, 31. Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 343 We thus see that close attention certainly affects various parts and organs, which are not properly under the control of the will. By what means attention — perhaps the most wonderful of all the wondrous powers of the mind — is effected, is au extremely obscure subject. According to Muller./ 4 the process by which the sensory cells of the brain are rendered, through the will, susceptible of receiving more intense and dis- tinct impressions, is closely analogous to that by which the motor cells are excited to send nerve-force to the voluntary muscles. There are many points of analogy in the action of the sensory and motor nerve-cells ; for instance, the familiar fact that close attention to any one sense causes fatigue, like the prolonged exertion of any one muscle. 45 When therefore we voluntarily concentrate our attention on any part of the body, the cells of the brain which receive impressions or sensa- tions from that part are, it is probable, in some un- known manner stimulated into activity. This may account, without any local change in the part to which our attention is earnestly directed, for pain or odd sen- sations being there felt or increased." If, however, the part is furnished with muscles, we cannot feel sure, as Mr. Michael Foster has remarked to me, that some slight impulse may not be uncon- sciously sent to such muscles ; and this would probably cause an obscure sensation in the part. In a large number of cases, as with the salivary and lacrymal glands, intestinal canal, &c, the power ol attention seems to rest, either chiefly, or as some phy- siologists think, exclusively, on the vaso-motor system being affected in such a manner that more blood is 44 { Elements of Physiology,' Eng. translat. vol. ii. p. 938. 45 Prof. Laycock has discussed this point in a very interesting manner. See his ' Nervous Diseases of Women,' 1840, p. 110. 344 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. allowed to flow into the capillaries of the part in ques- tion. This increased action of the capillaries may in some cases be combined with the simultaneously in- creased activity of the sensorium. The manner in which the mind affects the vaso- motor system may be conceived in the following manner. When we actually taste sour fruit, an im- pression is sent through the gustatory nerves to a certain part of the sensorium ; this transmits nerve- force to the vaso-motor centre, which consequently allows the muscular coats of the small arteries that permeate the • salivary glands to relax. Hence more blood flows into these glands, and they secrete a copious supply of saliva. Now it does not seem an improbable assumption, that, when we reflect intently on a sensa- tion, the same part of the sensorium, or a closely con- nected part of it, is brought into a\ state of activity, in the same manner as when we actually perceive the sensation. If so, the same cells in the brain will be excited, though, perhaps, in a less degree, by vividly thinking about a sour taste, as by perceiving it; and they will transmit in the one case, as in the other, nerve- force to the vaso-motor centre with the same results. To give another, and, in some respects, more appro- priate illustration. If a man stands before a hot fire, his face reddens. This appears to be due, as Mr. Michael Foster informs me, in part to the local action of the heat, and in part to a reflex action from the vaso-motor centres. 46 In this latter case, the heat affects the nerves of the face; these transmit an impression to the sensory cells of the brain, which act on the 46 See, also, Mr. Michael Foster, on the action of the vaso-motor system, in his interesting Lecture before the Eoyal Institution, as translated in the 1 Revue des Cours Seientifiques,' Sept. 25, 1869, p. 683. Chap. XIII. FLUSHING. 345 vaso- motor centre, and this reacts on the small arteries of the face, relaxing them and allowing them to become filled with blood. Here, again, it seems not improbable that if we were repeatedly to concentrate with great earnestness onr attention on the recollection of our heated faces, the same part of the sensorium which gives us the consciousness of actual heat would be in some slight degree stimulated, and would in conse- quence tend to transmit some nerve-force to the vaso- motor centres, so as to relax the capillaries of the face. Now as men during endless generations have had their attention often and earnestly directed to their personal appearance, and especially to their faces, any incipient tendency in the facial capillaries to be thus affected will have become in the course of time greatly strength- ened through the principles just referred to, namely, nerve-force passing readily along accustomed channels, and inherited habit. Thus, as it appears to me, a plausible explanation is afforded of the leading pheno- mena connected with the act of blushing. Recapitulation. — Men and women, and especially the young, have always valued, in a high degree, their personal appearance ; and have likewise regarded the appearance of others. The face has been the chief object of attention, though, when man aboriginally went naked, the whole surface of his body would have been attended to. Our self-attention is excited almost exclusively by the opinion of others, for no person living in absolute solitude would care about his appearance. Every one feels blame more acutely than praise. Now, whenever we know, or suppose, that others are depreciating our personal appearance, our attention is strongly drawn towards ourselves, more especially to our faces. The probable effect of this will be, as has just been ex- 346 BLUSHING. Chap. XIII. plained, to excite into activity that part of the senso- rium which receives the sensory nerves of the face ; and this will react through the vaso-rnotor system on the facial capillaries. By frequent reiteration during numberless generations, the process will have become so habitual, in association with the belief that others are thinking of us, that even a suspicion of their depreciation suffices to relax the capillaries, without any conscious thought about our faces. With some sensitive persons it is enough even to notice their dress to produce the same effect. Through the force, also, of association an 1 inheritance our capillaries are relaxed, whenever we know, or imagine, that any one is blamiug, though in silence, our actions, thoughts, or character ; and, again, when we are highly praised. On this hypothesis we can understand how it is that the face blushes much more than any other part of the body, though the whole surface is somewhat affected, more especially with the races which still go nearly naked. It is not at all surprising that the dark- coloured races should blush, though no change of colour is visible in their skins. From the principle of inheritance it is not surprising that persons born blind should blush. We can understand why the young are much more affected than the old, and women more than men ; and why the opposite sexes especially excite each other's blushes. It becomes obvious why personal remarks should be particularly liable to cause blushing, and why the most powerful of all the causes is shyness; for shyness relates to the presence and opinion of others, and the shy are always more or less self-conscious. With respect to real shame from moral delinquencies, we can perceive why it is not guilt, but the thought that others think us guilty, which raises a blush. A man reflecting on a crime committed in Chap. XIII. BLUSHING. 347 solitude, and stung by his conscience, does not blush ; yet he will blush under the vivid recollection of a detected fault, or of one committed in the presence of others, the degree of blushing being closely related to the feeling of regard for those who have detected, witnessed, or suspected bis fault. Breaches of con- ventional rules of conduct, if they are rigidly insisted on by our equals or superiors, often cause more intense blushes even than a detected crime ; and an act which is really criminal, if not blamed by our equals, hardly raises a tinge of colour on our cheeks. Modesty from humility, or from an indelicacy, excites a vivid blush, as both relate to the judgment or fixed customs of others. From the intimate sympathy which exists between the capillary circulation of the surface of the head and of the brain, whenever there is intense blushing, there will be some, and often great, confusion of mind. This is fre- quently accompanied by awkward movements, and some- times by the involuntary twitching of certain muscles. As blushing, according to this hypothesis, is an in- direct result of attention, originally directed to our personal appearance, that is to the surface of the body, and more especially to the face, we can understand the meaning of the gestures which accompany blushing throughout the world. These consist in hiding the face, or turning it towards the ground, or to one side. The eyes are generally averted or are restless, for to look at the man who causes us to feel shame or shy- ness, immediately brings home in an intolerable man- ner the consciousness that his gaze is directed on us. Through the principle of associated habit, the same movements of the face and eyes are practised, and can, indeed, hardly ' be avoided, whenever we know or believe that others are blaming, or too strongly praising, our moral conduct. 348 CONCLUDING REMARKS Chap. XIV. CHAPTER XIV. Concluding Eemarks and Summary. The three leading principles which have determined the chief move- ments of expression — Their inheritance — On the part which the will and intention have played in the acquirement of various expressions — The instinctive recognition of expression — The bearing of our subject on the specific unity of the races of man — On the successive acquirement of various expressions by the pro- genitors of man — The importance of expression — Conclusion. I have now described, to the best of my ability, the chief expressive actions in man, and in some few of the lower animals. I have also attempted to explain the origin or development of these actions through the three principles given in the first chapter. The first of these principles is, that movements which are ser- viceable in gratifying some desire, or in relieving some sensation, if often repeated, become so habitual that they are performed, whether or not of any service, whenever the same desire or sensation is felt, even in a very weak degree. Our second principle is that of antithesis. The habit of voluntarily performing opposite movements under opposite impulses has become firmly established in us by the practice of our whole lives. Hence, if certain actions have been regularly performed, in accordance with our first piinciple, under a certain frame of mind, there will be a strong and involuntary tendency to the performance of directly opposite actions, whether or not these are of any use, under the excitement of an oppo- site frame of mind. Chap. XIV. AND SUMMARY. 349 Our third principle is the direct action of the excited nervous system on the body, independently of the will, and independently, in large part, of habit. Experience shows that nerve-force is generated and set free whenever the cerebro-spinal system is excited. The direction which this nerve-force follows is necessarily determined by the lines of connection between the nerve-cells, with each other and with various parts of the body. But the direction is likewise much in- fluenced by habit ; inasmuch as nerve-force passes readily along accustomed channels. The frantic and senseless actions of an enraged man may be attributed in part to the undirected flow of nerve-force, and in part to the effects of habit, for these actions often vaguely represent the act of striking. They thus pass into gestures included under our first principle ; as when an indignant man unconsciously throws himself into a fitting attitude for attacking his opponent, though without any intention of making an actual attack. We see also the influence of habit in all the emotions and sensations which are called ex- citing; for they have assumed this character from having habitually led to energetic action; and action affects, in an indirect manner, the respiratory and circulatory system ; and the latter reacts on the brain. Whenever these emotions or sensations are even slightly felt by us, though they may not at the time lead to any exertion, our whole system is never- theless disturbed through the force of habit and asso- ciation. Other emotions and sensations are called depressing, because they have not habitually led to energetic action, excepting just at first, as in the case of extreme pain, fear, and grief, and they have ulti- mately caused complete exhaustion ; they are con- sequently expressed chiefly by negative signs and by 350 CONCLUDING BEMAEKS Chap. XIV. prostration. Again, there are other emotions, such as that of affection, which do not commonly lead to action of any kind, and consequently are not exhibited by any strongly marked outward signs. Affection indeed, in as far as it is a pleasurable sensation, excites the ordinary signs of pleasure. On the other hand, many of the effects due to the excitement of the nervous system seem to be quite independent of the flow of nerve-force along the chan- nels which have been rendered habitual by former exertions of the will. Such effects, which often reveal • the state of mind of the person thus affected, cannot at present be explained ; for instance, the change of colour in the hair from extreme terror or grief, — the cold sweat and the trembling of the muscles from fear, — the modified secretions of the intestinal canal, — and the failure of certain glands to act. Notwithstanding that much remains unintelligible in our present subject, so many expressive movements and actions can be explained to a certain extent through the above three principles, that w r e may hope hereafter to see all explained by these or by closely analogous principles. Actions of all kinds, if regularly accompanying any state of the mind, are at once recognised as expressive. These may consist of movements of any part of the body, as the wagging of a dog's tail, the shrugging of a man's shoulders, the erection of the hair, the exuda- tion of perspiration, the state of the capillary circu- lation, laboured breathing, and the use of the vocal or other sound-producing instruments. Even insects express anger, terror, jealousy, and love by their stimu- lation. With man the respiratory organs are of especial importance in expression, not only in a direct, but in a still higher degree in an indirect In an ner. Chap. XIV. AND SUMMAEY. 351 Few points are more interesting in onr present sub- ject than the extraordinarily complex chain of events which lead to certain expressive movements. Take, for instance, the oblique eyebrows of a man suffering from grief or anxiety. When infants scream loudly from hunger or pain, the circulation is affected, and the eyes tend to become gorged with blood : conse- quently the muscles surrounding the eyes are strongly contracted as a protection : this action, in the course of many generations, has become firmly fixed and in- herited : but when, with advancing years and culture, the habit of screaming is partially repressed, the muscles round the eyes still tend to contract, when- ever even slight distress is felt : of these muscles, the pyramidals of the nose are less under the control of the will than are the others, and their contraction can be checked only by that of the central fasciae of the frontal muscle : these latter fasciae draw up the inner ends of the eyebrows, and wrinkle the forehead in a peculiar manner, which we instantly recognise as the expression of grief or anxiety. Slight movements, such as these just described, or the scarcely perceptible drawing down of the corners of the mouth, are the last remnants or rudiments of strongly marked and intelligible movements. They are as full of signifi- cance to us in regard to expression, as are ordinary rudiments to the naturalist in the classification and genealogy of organic beings. That the chief expressive actions, exhibited by man and by the lower animals, are now innate or inherited, — that is, have not been learnt by the individual, — is admitted by every one. So little has learning or imi- tation to do with several of them that they are from the earliest days and throughout life quite be- yond cur control ; for instance, the relaxation of 352 CONCLUDING REMARKS Chap. XIV. the arteries of the skin in blushing", and the increased action of the heart in anger. We may see children, only two or three years old, and even those born blind, blushing from shame; and the naked scalp of a very young infant reddens from passion. Infants scream from pain directly after birth, and all their features then assume the same form as during subsequent years. These facts alone suffice to show that many of our most important expressions have not been learnt ; but it is remarkable that some, which are certainly innate, require practice in the individual, before they are per- formed in a full and perfect manner; for instance, weeping and laughing. The inheritance of most of our expressive actions explains the fact that those born blind display them, as I hear from the Rev. R. H. Blair, equally well with those gifted with e esight. We can thus also understand the fact that the young and the old of widely different races, both with man and animals, express the same state of mind by the same movements. We are so familiar with the fact of young and old animals displaying their feelings in the same manner, that we hardly perceive how remarkable it is that a young puppy should wag its tail when pleased, depress its ears and uncover its canine teeth when pretending to be savage, just like an old dog; or that a kitten should arch its little back and erect its hair when frightened and angry, like an old cat. When, how- ever, we turn to less common gestures in ourselves, which we are accustomed to look at as artificial or conventional,— such as shrugging the shoulders, as a sign of impotence, or the raising the arms with open hands and extended fingers, as a sign of wonder, — we feel perhaps too much surprise at finding that they are innate. That these and some other gestures are in- Chap. XIV. AND SUMMAIIY. 353 herited, we may infer from their being performed by- very young children, by those born blind, and by the most widely distinct races of man. We should also bear in mind that new and highly peculiar tricks, in association with certain states of the mind, are known to have arisen in certain individuals, and to have been afterwards transmitted to their offspring, in some cases, for more than one generation. Certain other gestures, which seem to us so natural that we might easily imagine that they were innate, apparently have been learnt like the words of a lan- guage. This seems to be the case with the joining of the uplifted hands, and the turning up of the eyes, in . prayer. So it is with kissing as a mark of affection ; but this is innate, in so far as it depends on the plea- sure derived from contact with a beloved person. The evidence with respect to the inheritance of nodding and shaking the head, as signs of affirmation and nega- tion, is doubtful; for they are not universal, yet seem too general to have been independently acquired by all* the individuals of so many races. We will now consider how far the will and conscious- ness have come into play in the development of the various movements of expression. As far as we can judge, only a few expressive movements, such as those just referred to, are learnt by each individual ; that is, were consciously and voluntarily performed during the early years of life for some definite object, or in . imitation of others, and then became habitual. The far greater number of the movements of expression, and all the more important ones, are, as we have F6en, innate or inherited ; and such cannot be said to dep; n I on the will of the individual. Nevertheless, all those included under our first principle were at first volun- 1C 354 CONCLUDING REMARKS Chap. XIV. tarily performed for a definite object, — namely, to escape some danger, to relieve some distress, or to gratify some desire. For instance, there can hardly be a doubt that the animals which fight with their teeth, have acquired the habit of drawing back their ears closely to their heads, when feeling savage, from their progenitors having voluntarily acted in this manner in order to protect their ears from being torn by their antagonists ; for those animals which do not fight with their teeth do not thus express a savage state of mind. We may infer as highly probable that we ourselves have acquired the habit of contracting the muscles round the eyes, whilst crying gently, that is, without the utterance of any loud sound, from our progenitors, especially during infancy, having expe- rienced, during the act of screaming, an uncomfortable sensation in their eyeballs. Again, some highly ex- pressive movements result from the endeavour to check or prevent other expressive movements ; thus the obli- quity of the eyebrows and the drawing clown of the corners of the mouth follow from the endeavour to prevent a screaming-fit from coming on, or to check it after it has come on. Here it is obvious that the con- sciousness and will must at first have come into play ; not that we are conscious in these or in other such cases what muscles are brought into action, any more than when we perform the most ordinary voluntary movements. With respect to the expressive movements due to the principle of antithesis, it is clear that the will has intervened, though in a remote and indirect manner. So again with the movements coming under our third principle ; these, in as far as they are influenced by nerve-force readily passing along habitual channels, have been determined by former and repeated exer- Chap. XIV. AND SUMMARY. 355 tions of the will. The effects indirectly due to this latter agency are often combined in a complex manner, through the force of habit and association, with those directly resulting from the excitement of the cerebro- spinal system. This seems to be the case with the in- creased action of the heart under the influence of any strong emotion. When an animal erects its hair, as- sumes a threatening attitude, and utters fierce sounds, in order to terrify an enemy, we see a curious combi- nation of movements which were originally voluntary with those that are involuntary. It is, however, possible that even strictly involuntary actions, such as the erection of the hair, may have been affected by the mysterious power of the will. Some expressive movements may have arisen spon- taneously, in association with certain states of the mind, like the tricks lately referred to, and afterwards been inherited. But I know of no evidence rendering this view probable. The power of communication between the members of the same tribe by means of language has been of paramount importance in the development of man; and the force of language is much aided by the expres- sive movements of the face and body. We perceive this at once when we converse on an important sub- ject with any person whose face is concealed. Never- theless there are no grounds, as far as I can discover, for believing that any muscle has been developed or even modified exclusively for the sake of expression. The vocal and other sound-producing organs, by which various expressive noises are produced, seem to form a partial exception ; but I have elsewhere attempted to show that these organs were first developed for sexual purposes, in order that one sex mi^ht call or charm the other. Nor can I discover grounds for believing that 356 CONCLUDING REMARKS Chap. XIV. any inherited movement, which now serves as a means of expression, was at first voluntarily and consciously performed for this special purpose, — like some of the gestures and the finger-language used by the deaf and dumb. On the contrary, every true or inherited move- ment of expression seems to have had some natural and independent origin. But when once acquired, such movements may be voluntarily and consciously em- ployed as a means of communication. Even infants, if carefully attended to, find out at a very early age that their screaming brings relief, and they soon voluntarily practise it. We may frequently see a person volun- tarily raising his eyebrows to express surprise, or smiling to express pretended satisfaction and acqui- escence. A man often wishes to make certain gestures conspicuous or demonstrative, and will raise his ex- tended arms with widely opened fingers above his head, to show astonishment, or lift his shoulders to his ears, to show that he cannot or will not do something. The tendency to such movements will be strengthened or increased by their being thus voluntarily and repeatedly performed ; and the effects may be inherited. It is perhaps worth consideration whether move- ments at first used only by one or a few individuals to express a certain state of mind may not sometimes have spread to others, and ultimately have become universal, through the power of conscious and uncon- scious imitation. That there exists in man a strong tendency to imitation, independently of the conscious will, is certain. This is exhibited in the most extra- ordinary manner in certain brain diseases, especially at the commencement of inflammatory softening of the brain, and has been called the " echo sign." Patients thus affected imitate, without understanding, every absurd gesture which is made, and every word which Chap. XIV. AND SUMMARY. 357 is uttered near them, even in a foreign language. 1 In the case of animals, the jackal and wolf have learnt under confinement to imitate the barking of the clog. How the barking of the dog, which serves to express various emotions and desires, and which is so remark- able from having been acquired since the animal was domesticated, and from being inherited in different degrees by different breeds, was first learnt, we do not know ; but may we not suspect that imitation has had something to do with its acquisition, owing to dogs having long lived in strict association with so loqua- cious an animal as man ? In the course of the foregoing remarks and through- out this volume, I have often felt much difficulty about the proper application of the terms, will, consciousness, and intention. Actions, which were at first volun- tary, soon become habitual, and at last hereditary, and may then be performed even in opposition to the will. Although they often reveal the state of the mind, this result was not at first either intended or ex- pected. Even such words as that " certain movements serve as a means of expression " are apt to mislead, as they imply that this was their primary purpose or object. This, however, seems rarely or never to have been the case; the movements having been at first either of some direct use, or the indirect effect of the excited state of the sensorium. An infant may scream either intentionally or instinctively to show that it wants food ; but it has no wish or intention to draw its features into the peculiar form which so plainly indicates misery ; yet some of the most characteristic expressions exhibited by man are derived from the act of screaming, as has been explained. 1 See the interesting facts given by Dr. Bateman on 'Aphasia,' 1870, p. 110. 358 CONCLUDING REMARKS Chap. XIV. Although most of our expressive actions are innate or instinctive, as is admitted by everyone, it is a dif- ferent question whether we have any instinctive power of recognising them. This has generally been assumed to be the case ; but the assumption has been strongly controverted by M. Lemoine. 2 Monkeys soon learn to distinguish, not only the tones of voice of their masters, but the expression of their faces, as is asserted by a careful observer. 3 Dogs well know the difference between caressing and threatening gestures or tones ; and they seem to recognise a compassionate tone. But as far as I can make out, after repeated trials, they do not understand any movement confined to the features, excepting a smile or laugh ; and this they appear, at least in some cases, to recognise. This limited amount of knowledge has probably been gained, both by monkeys and dogs, through their associating harsh or kind treatment with our actions ; and the knowledge certainly is not instinctive. Children, no doubt, would soon learn the movements of expression in their elders in the same manner as animals learn those of man. Moreover, when a child cries or laughs, he knows in a general manner what he is doing and what he feels; so that a very small exertion of reason would tell him what crying or laughing meant in others. But the question is, do our chil- dren acquire their knowledge of expression solely by experience through the power of association and reason ? As most of the movements of expression must have been gradually acquired, afterwards becoming instinc- 2 * La Physionomie et la Parole,' I860, pp. 103, 118. 8 Kengger, 1 Naturgeschichte der S'augethiere von Paraguay,' 1830, 8. 55. Chap. XIV. AND SUMMARY. 359 tive, there seems to be some degree of a priori proba- bility that their recognition would likewise have become instinctive. There is, at least, no greater difficulty in believing this than in admitting that, when a female quadruped first bears young, she knows the C|V of dis- tress of her offspring, or than in admitting that many animals instinctively recognise and fear their enemies ; and of both these statements there can be no reasonable doubt. It is however extremely difficult to prove that our children instinctively recognise any expression. I attended to this point in my first-born infant, who could not have learnt anything by associating with other children, and I was convinced that he understood a smile and received pleasure from seeing one, answering it by another, at much too early an age to have learnt anything by experience. When this child was about four months old, I made in his presence many odd noises and strange grimaces, and tried to look savage ; but the noises, if not too loud, as well as the grimaces, were all taken as good jokes ; and I attributed this at the time to their being preceded or accompanied by smiles. When five months old, he seemed to under- stand a compassionate expression and tone of voice. When a few days over six months old, his nurse pre- tended to cry, and I saw that his face instantly assumed a melancholy expression, with the corners of the mouth strongly depressed ; now this child could rarely have seen any other child crying, and never a grown-up person crying, and I should doubt whether at so early an age he could have reasoned on the subject. There- fore it seems to me that an innate feeling must have told him that the pretended crying of his nurse ex- pressed grief; and this through the instinct of sympathy excited grief in him. M. Lemoine argues that, if man possessed an innate 3(50 CONCLUDING REMARKS Chap. XIV knowledge of expression, authors and artists would not have found it so difficult, as is notoriously the case, to describe and depict the characteristic signs of each particular state of mind. But this does not seem to me a valid argument. We may actually behold the expression changing in an unmistakable manner in a man or animal, and yet be quite unable, as I know from experience, to analyse the nature of the change. Tn the two photographs given by Duchenne of the same old man (Plate III. figs. 5 and 6), almost every one re- cognised that the one represented a true, and the other a false smile ; but I have found it very difficult to decide in what the whole amount of difference consists. It lias often struck me as a curious fact that so many shades of expression are instantly recognised without any conscious process of analysis on our part. No one, I believe, can clearly describe a sullen or sly expres- sion; yet many observers are unanimous that these expressions can be recognised m the various races of man. Almost everyone to whom I showed Duchenne's photograph of the young man with oblique eyebrows (Plate II. fig. 2) at once declared that it expressed grief or some such feeling ; yet probably not one of these persons, or one out of a thousand persons, could beforehand have told anything precise about the obliquity of the eyebrows with their inner ends puckered, or about the rectangular furrows on the fore- head. So it is with many other expressions, of which I have had practical experience in the trouble requisite in instructing others what points to observe.' If, then, great ignorance of details does not prevent our recog- nising with certainty and promptitude various expres- sions, I do not see how this ignorance can be advanced ' as an argument that our knowledge, though vague and general, is not innate. Chap. XIV. AND SUMMARY. 361 I have endeavoured to show in considerable detail that all the chief expressions exhibited by man are the same throughout the world. This fact is interesting, as it affords a new argument in favour of the several races being descended from a single parent-stock, which must have been almost completely human in structure, and to a large extent in mind, before the period at which the races diverged from each other. No doubt similar structures, adapted for the same purpose, have often been independently acquired through variation and natural selection by distinct species ; but this view will not explain close similarity between distinct species in a multitude of unimportant details. Now if we bear in mind the numerous points of structure having no rela- tion to expression, in which all the races of man closely agree, and then add to them the numerous points, some of the highest importance and many of the most trifling value, on which the movements of expression directly or indirectly depend, it seems to me improbable in the highest degree that so much similarity, or rather identity of structure, could have been acquired by independent means. Yet this must have been the case if the races of man are descended from several abori- ginally distinct species. It is far more probable that the many points of close similarity in the various races are due to inheritance from a single parent-form, which had already assumed a human character. It is a curious, though perhaps an idle speculation, how early in the long line of our progenitors the various expressive movements, now exhibited by man, were successively acquired. The following remarks will at least serve to recall some of the chief points discussed in this volume. We may confidently believe that laughter, as a sign of pleasure or enjoyment, was 1 practised by our progenitors long before they deserved 362 CONCLUDING REMARKS Ciiap. XIV. to be called human ; for very many kinds of monkeys, when pleased, utter a reiterated sound, clearly analogous to our laughter, often' accompanied by vibratory move- ments of their jaws or lips, with the corners of the mouth drawn backwards and upwards, by the wrinkling of the cheeks, and even by the brightening of the eyes. We may likewise infer that fear was expressed from an extremely remote period, in almost the same manner as it now is by man ; namely, by trembling, the erec- tion of the hair, cold perspiration, pallor, widely opened eyes, the relaxation of most of the muscles, and by the whole body cowering downwards or held motionless. Suffering, if great, will from the first have caused screams or groans to be uttered, the body to be con- torted, and the teeth to be ground together. But our progenitors will not have exhibited those highly expres- sive movements of the features which accompany screaming and crying until their circulatory and respi- ratory organs, and the muscles surrounding the eyes, had acquired their present structure. The shedding of tears appears to have originated through reflex action from the spasmodic contraction of the eyelids, together perhaps with the eyeballs becoming gorged with blood during the act of screaming. Therefore weeping probably came on rather late in the line of our descent; and this conclusion agrees with the fact that our nearest allies, the anthropomorphous apes, do not weep. But we must here exercise some caution, for as certain monkeys, which are not closely related to man, weep, this habit might have been developed long ago in a sub-branch of the group from which man is derived. Our early progenitors, when suffering from grief or anxiety, would not have made their eyebrows oblique, or have drawn down the corners of their mouth, Chap. XIV. AND SUMMARY. 363 until they had acquired the habit of endeavouring to restrain their screams. The expression, therefore, of grief and anxiety is eminently human. Rage will have been expressed at a very early period by threatening or frantic gestures, by the reddening of the skin, and by glaring eyes, but not by frowning. For the habit of frowning seems to have been acquired chiefly from the corrugators being the first muscles to contract round the eyes, whenever during infancy pain, anger, or distress is felt, and there consequently is a near approach to screaming; and partly from a frown serving as a shade in difficult and intent vision. It seems pro- bable that this shading action would not have become habitual until man had assumed a completely upright position, for monkeys do not frown when exposed to a glaring light. Our early progenitors, when enraged, would probably have exposed their teeth more freely than does man, even when giving full vent to his rage, as with the insane. We may, also, feel almost certain that they would have * protruded their lips, when sulky or disappointed, in a greater degree than is the case with our own children, or even with the children of* existing savage races. Our early progenitors, when indignant or moderately * angry, would not have held their heads erect, opened their chests, squared their shoulders, and clenched their fists, until they had acquired the ordinary carriage and upright attitude of man, and had learnt to fight with • their fists or clubs. Until this period had arrived the antithetical gesture of shrugging the shoulders, as a sign of impotence or of patience, would not have been developed. From the same reason astonishment would not then have been expressed by raising the arms with open hands and extended fingers. Nor, judging from the actions of monkeys, would astonishment have been 364 CONCLUDING REMARKS Chap. XIV. exhibited by a widely open mouth ; but the eyes would have been opened and the eyebrows arched. Disgust would have been shown at a very early period by movements round the mouth, like those of vomiting, — that is, if the view which I have suggested respecting the source of the expression is correct, namely, that our progenitors had the power, and used it, of volun- tarily and quickly rejecting any food from their stomachs which they disliked. But the more refined manner of showing contempt or disdain, by lowering the eyelids, or turning away the eyes and face, as if the despised person were not worth looking at, would not probably have been acquired until a much later period. Of all expressions, blushing seems to be the most strictly human ; yet it is common to all or nearly all the races of man, whether or not any change of colour is visible in their skin. The relaxation of the small arteries of the surface, on which blushing depends, seems to have primarily resulted from earnest attention directed to the appearance of our own persons, especially of our faces, aided by habit, inheritance, and the ready flow of nerve-force along accustomed channels ; and afterwards to have been extended by the power of as- sociation to self-attention directed to moral conduct. It can hardly be doubted that many animals are capable of appreciating beautiful colours and even forms, as is shown by the pains which the individuals of one sex take in displaying their beauty before those of the opposite sex. But it does not seem possible that any animal, until its mental powers had been developed to an equal or nearly equal degree with those of man, would have closely considered and been sensitive about its own personal appearance. Therefore we may con- clude that blushing originated at a very late period in the long line of our descent. Chap. XIV. AND SUM MAE Y. 365 From the various facts just alluded to, and given in the course of this volume, it follows that, if the struc- ture of our organs of respiration and circulation had differed in only a slight degree from the state in which they now exist, most of our expressions would have been wonderfully different. A very slight change in the course of the arteries and veins which run to the head, would probably have prevented the blood from accu- mulating in our eyeballs during violent expiration; for this occurs in extremely few quadrupeds. In this case we should not have displayed some of our most characteristic expressions. If man had breathed water by the aid of external branchia3 (though the idea is hardly conceivable), instead of air through his mouth and nostrils, his features would not have expressed his feelings much more efficiently than now do his hands or limbs. Rage and disgust, however, would still have been shown by movements about the lips and mouth, and the eyes would have become brighter or duller according to the state of the circulation. If our ears had remained movable, their movements would have been highly expressive, as .is the case with all the animals which fight with their teeth ; and we may infer that our early progenitors thus fought, as we still uncover the canine tooth on one side when we sneer at or defy any one, and we uncover all our teeth when furiously enraged. The movements of expression in the face and body, whatever their origin may have been, are in themselves of much importance for our welfare. They serve as the first means of communication between the mother and her infant ; she smiles approval, and thus encourages her child on the right path, or frowns disapproval. We readily perceive sympathy in others by their expres- 366 CONCLUDING REMARKS Chap. XIV. sion ; our sufferings are thus mitigated and our plea- sures increased ; and mutual good feeling is thus strengthened. The movements of expression give vivid- ness and energy to our spoken words. They reveal the thoughts and intentions of others more truly than do words, which may be falsified. Whatever amount of truth the so-called science of physiognomy may contain, appears to depend, as Haller long ago re- marked, 4 on different persons bringing into frequent use different facial muscles, according to their disposi- tions ; the development of these muscles being perhaps thus increased, and the lines or furrows on the face, due to their habitual contraction, being thus rendered deeper and more conspicuous. The free expression by outward signs of an emotion intensifies it. On the other hand, the repression, as far as this is possible, of all outward signs softens our emotions. 5 He who gives way to violent gestures will increase his rage ; he , who does not control the signs of fear will experience fear in a greater degree ; and he who remains passive when overwhelmed with grief loses his best chance of recovering elasticity of mind. These results follow partly from the intimate relation which exists between almost all the emotions and their outw T ard manifesta- tions ; and partly from the direct influence of exertion on the heart, and consequently on the brain. Even the simulation of an emotion tends to arouse it in our minds. Shakespeare, who from his wonderful knowledge of the human mind ought to be an excellent judge, says : — " Is it not monstrous that this player here, But in a fiction, in a dream of passion, ♦ Quoted by Moreau, in his edition of Lavater, 1820, torn. iv. p. 211. 5 Gratiolet (' De la Physionomie,' 1865, p. 66) insists on the truth of this conclusion. Chap. XIV. AND SUMMARY. 367 Could force his soul so to his own conceit, That, from her working, all his visage wann'd ; Tears in his eyes, distraction in 's aspect, A broken voice, and his whole function suiting "With forms to his conceit? And all for nothing ! " Hamlet, act ii. sc. 2. We have seen that the study of the theory of ex- pression confirms to a certain limited extent the con- clusion that man is derived from some lower animal form, and supports the belief of the specific or sub- specific unity of the several races; but as far as my judgment serves, such confirmation was hardly needed. We have also seen that expression in itself, or the language of the emotions, as it has sometimes been called, is certainly of importance for the welfare of mankind. To understand, as far as is possible, the source or origin of the various expressions which may be hourly seen on the faces of the men around us, not to mention our domesticated animals, ought to possess much interest for us. From these several causes, we may conclude that the philosophy of our subject has well deserved the attention which it has already received from several excellent observers, and that it deserves still further attention, especially from any able physio- logist. INDEX. ABSTRACTION. A. Abstraction, 228. Actions, reflex, 35 ; coughing, sneez- ing, &c., 35 ; muscular action of decapitated frog, 35 ; closing the eyelids, 37 ; starting, 38-40 ; con- traction of the iris, 41. Admiration, 289. Affirmation, signs of, 273. Albinos, blushing in, 313, 327. Alison, Professor, 31. Ambition, 262.^ Anatomical drawings by Henle, 5. Anatomy and Philosophy of expres- sion, 2. Anderson, Dr., 107, n. 26. Anger, 246 ; in monkeys, 137. Animals, special expressions of, 116. See Expression. , habitual associated movements in the lower, 42—45 ; wolves and jackals, 44 ; horses, 45 ; cats, 46 ; chickens, 47 ; sheldrakes, 47 ; fla- mingo, kagu, and kingfisher, 47, 48, Annesley, Lieut., R.A., 125, n. 4. Antithesis, the principles of, 50 ; dogs, 50, 57 ; cats, 56 ; conventional signs, 61. Anxiety, 178. Ape, the Gibbon, produces musical sounds, 87. Arrectores pili, the, 101, 103. Association," the power of, 31 ; in- stances of, 31, 32. Astonishment, 278 ; in monkeys, 144. Audubon, 98, n. 14. Avarice, 262. Azara. 126, n. 6, 129, n. 7. Baboon, the Anubis, 96, 134, 138. Bain, Mr., 8, 31, 200, w. 4, 291, ». 16, 328, n. 25. Baker, Sir Samuel, 114. Barber, Mrs., 22, 108, n. 28, 269, 289. Bartlett, Mr., 44, 48, 113, 124, 138. Behn, Dr., 311. Bell, Mr., 293. , Sir Charles, 2, 9, 49, 116, 121, 158, 173, 213, 220, 222, 305, 337. Bennett, G., 140, n. 16. Bergeon, 169, n. 21. Bernard, Claude, 37, 68, 70, n. 5. Billiard-player, gestures of the, 6. Birds ruffle their feathers when angry, 97 ; when frightened adpi ess them, 100. Blair, the Rev. R. H., 311, 352. Blind, tendency of the, to blush, 312. Blush, the tendency to, inherited, 312. Blushing, 310; inheritance of, 312; in the various races of man, 316; movements and gestures which ac- company, 321 ; confusion of mind, 323; the nature of the mental states which induce, 326 ; shyness, 330 ; moral causes : guilt, 333 ; breaches of etiquett e, 334; modesty, 335 ; theory of, 337. , the physiology or mechanism of, 5, 310, n. 1. Blyth, Mr., 97. Bowman, Mr., 160, n. 14, 161, n. 16, 171, 227. Brehm, 96,129, 138, n. T4, 139, n. 15. Bridges, Mr., 22, 248, 261, 318. Bridgman, Laura, 198, 214, 267, 274, 285, 311. Brinton, Dr., 159, n. 13. Brodie, Sir B., 342. Brooke, the Rajah, 21, 209. Brown, Dr. R.,' 108, n. 29. Browne, Dr. J. Crichton, 13, 76, n. po, 155, 185, 199, 205, 244, 292, 295, 314, 341, n. 39. Bucknill, Dr., 297. Bulmer, Mr. J., 20, 209, 251, 285 321. BUNNETT. INDEX. EXPRESSION. 309 Bunnett, Mr. Templeton, 20, 178, 269. Burgess, Dr., 5, 310, 320, 337. Burton, Captain, 261. Button, Jemmy, the Fuegian, 216, 318. C. Camper, Pierre, 1 and n. 3. Canine tooth, uncovering the, 249. Carpenter on the principles of Com- parative Physiology, 47, n. 1 7. Cat, the, 46, 126 ; preparing to fight, 56 ; caressing her master, 56 ; drawing back the ears, 111; lash- ing the tail, 126; movements of affection, 127 ; when terrified, 128 ; erecting the tail, 129 ; purring, &c, 129. Catlin, 289. Caton, the Hon. J., 97, n. u. Cebus azarae, the, 133. Chameleons, 105. Cheerfulness, 212. Chevreul, M., 6. Chimpanzee, the, 95, 132. Cistercian Monks, the, 61 ; gesture- language of, 61. Cobra-de-capello, the, 105. Conceit, 262. Contempt, 254 ; snapping the fingers, 257. Cooke, the actor, 250. Cooper, Dr., 105, n. 22. Cope, Professor, 109, n. 31. Coughing. 164. Crantz, 260. D. Darwin, Dr., 30, n. 3, 46, n. 16, 40. Deaf and dumb, opposites used in teaching them, 61, 62, n. 3. Deceit, 262. Decision, or determination, 235 ; closing of the mouth, 236. Dejection, 178. Defiance, 249. Depression of mind, 80. Dermal appendages, erection of, 95; in the chimpanzee and orang, 95 ; lion, &c, 96 ; dog and cat, 96 ; horses and cattle, 96 ; elk, 97 ; bat, 97 ; birds, 97 ; under the influence of anger and fear, 1 00. Despair, 178. Devotion, the expression of, 220, 221. j Diagrams of the muscles of the face, 24, 25. ! Dickens, Charles, 243. I Dilatation of the pupils, 303. ! Disdain, 254. I Disgust, 257; spitting a sign of, 261. Dog, the, sympathetic movements of, 7 ; turning round before lying down, 42 ; pointing, 43 ; scratching, &c, 45 ; various gestures of, 63 ; bark- ing a means of expression, 85; whining, 88 ; drawing back the ears, 111; various movements of, 116; gestures of affection, 119; grinning, 120; pain, 122; atten- tion, 122; terror, 122; playing, 123. Donders, Professor, 160, 166, 229, 304. Duchenne, Dr., 5, 11,14, 133, 150, a. 4, 182. E. Ears, the, drawing back, &c, 111 ; in fighting, dogs, cats, tigers, &c, 111; horses, 112; guanacoes, &c, 112; moose-deer, 113; rabbits, 113; wild boars, 113: monkeys, 114; erection of the, 114. Edgeworth, Maria and R. L., 333. Elephants, 113; weeping, 167. Emission of sounds, 83. See Sounds. Engelmann, Professor, 229. Envy, 262. I Erection of the dermal appendages, 95-104. Erskine, Mr. H., 21, 33, 187, 268, 276. Etiquette, breaches of, 334. Expression, anatomy and philosophy of, 2. , general principles of, 27 ; the three chief, 27 ; of serviceable asso- ciated habits, 29 ; of ant ithesis, 50 ; action of the nervous system, 67. , means of, in animals, 83 ; emis- sion of sounds, 83-94 ; erection of the dermal appendages, 95-104; 370 EXPRESSIONS. inflation of the body, 104-111; drawing back the ears, 111-114; erection of the ears, 114. Expressions, special, of animals, 116; dogs, 116-126; cats, 126-129; horses, 129-131 ; ruminants, 131- 132 ; monkeys, baboons, chimpan- zees, 132-146. , special, of man, 147 ; suffering, 114; weeping in children, 148; contraction of the muscles round the eyes during screaming, 158 ; secretion of tears, 163 ; grief, 178 ; obliquity of the eyebrows, 179 ; grief-muscles, 181 ; depression of the corners of the mouth, 193 ; joy, 198 ; high spirits, cheerful- ness, 212; love, tender feelings, 215 ; devotion, 220. Eyebrows, obliquity of the, 179. Eyes, the, contraction of the muscles during screaming, 158. F. Fear, 81, 289 ; description of, by Job, 291. Feelings, tender, 216 ; excited by sympathy, 217. Fighting, mode of, in animals, 111 ; all carnivora fight with their canine teeth, 111; dogs, cats, 111 ; horses, guanacoes, &c, 112; moose-deer, 113; rabbits, 113; boars, 113; elephants, 113; rhinoceros, 114; monkeys, 114. Forbes, Mr. D., 232, 318, 336. Ford, Mr., 95. Forster, J. R., 318. Foster, Mr. Michael, 343, 344. Fox, the, 125. Freycinet, 175. Frogs, 35, 104. Frowning, the act of, 3, 223 ; men of all races frown, 224 ; in infants, 225 ; to assist vision, 226 ; to ex- clude the bright light, 227. Fyffe, Dr., 304. G. Gaika, Christian, 22, 209, 255, 295, 320. Galton, Mr. F., 33, n. 8. HIPPOCRATES. Garrod, Mr. A. H., 74, n. g. Gaskell, Mrs., 151, n. 5. Geach, Mr. F., 21, 187, 252, 261, 268, 317. Gesture-language, 61. Gestures, 32, 62 ; inheritance of ha- bitual, 33, n. 8 ; accompanying blushing, 321. Glenie, the Rev. S. O., 21, 167, 252. Goose-skin, 101, 103. Gordon, Lady Duff, 317. Gorilla, the, 95, 143. Gould, 100, n. 14. Gratiolet, Pierre, 6, 32, 119, 227, 229, n. 6, 236, 243, n. 9, 338. Gray, Professor, and Mrs. Asa, 22, 268, 316. Green, Mrs., 20. Grief, 80; expression of, 178; obli- quity of the eyebrows, 179 ; depres- sion of the corners of the mouth, 193 ; in monkeys, 135. Grief-muscles, 181-193. Gueldenstadt, 125, n. 4. Guilt, 262 ; causes blushing, 333. Gunning, Dr., 162. Gunther, Dr., 100, 105, 108, n. 30. H. Habit, force of, 29. Hagenauer, the Rev., 20, 194, 26 r 321. Hair, change of colour in the, 67 342; erection of the, 101, 295. Haller, 88. 'Handbuch der Anatomie des Men- schen,' 5, n. 7. Hares, 83. Harvey, 30, n. 3. Hatred, 239 ; rage, 240 ; anger, indig- nation, 246 ; sneering, defiance, un- covering the canine tooth, 249. Heart, the, sensitive to external emo- tions, 68 ; re-acts on the brain, 69 ; affected by rage, 74. Helmholtz, 88, 91. Helplessness, 264. Henderson, Mr., 409, n. 3 r. Henle, 149, n. 2, 193, n. 6, 203. Herpestes, the, 98, 108, 110. High spirits, 212; definition of, by a child, 212. Hippocrates, 30, ». 3, 72. INDEX. HOLLAND. INDEX. MECANISME. 371 Holland, Sir Henry, 36, 37, 71, n. 8, 339, n. 33, 340. Homer's description of laughter, 198. Horror, 304. Horse, the, 45 ; nibbling, pawing of, 45 ; scream in distress, 84 ; fight- ing, 112; expression of fear, plea- sure, &c, 130. Humboldt, 137, 319. Humility, 262. Huschke, 287. Huxley, Professor, 31, n. 5, 35, n. 9. Hyaena, the, 123. I. Idiots, expression of joy in, 199 ; blushing, 311. Ill-temper, 230. Impotence, 264. Indignation, 246. Infants, expression in, 13 ; crying of, 148 ; weeping, 153. Inflation of the body, &c, 104 ; in toads and frogs, 104 ; chameleons, &c, 105; snakes, 105-111. Inheritance of habitual gestures, 33, n. 8 ; blushing, 312. Innes, Dr., 267. Intercommunication, power of, with social animals, 60 ; deaf and dumb, 61 ; dogs and cats, 63. J. Jealousy, 79, 262. Jerdon, Dr., 108. Job, description of fear by, 291. Joy, expression of, 75, 198 ; in young children, 76 ; dogs, horses, 76 ; monkeys, 132 ; laughter, 198 ; high spirits, cheerfulness, 212 ; love, tender feelings, 215. Jukes, Mr. J. B., 275. K. Kangaroos, 113. Kindermann, Herr, 23, 148, n. 1. King, Major Ross, 113. Kissing, 216. Kolliker, 101. L. Lacy, Mr. Dyson, 20, 232, 243. Lane, Mr. H. B., 20. Lang, Mr. Archibald G., 20. Langstaff, Dr., 148, 152, 314. Language, gesture, 611. Laughter, 93, 133,164; in monkeys, 132 ; joy expressed by, 198 ; in children, 198; in idiots, 199; in grown-up persons, 199 ; caused by tickling, 201 ; sparkling eye, 206 ; tears caused by excessive, 208 ; among Hindoos, Malays, &c, 209 ; to conceal feelings, 214; incipient, in a baby, 211. Lavater, G., 3, n. 6. Laycock, Professor, 340. Le Brun, 1, 4, 247, w. 13. Leichhardt, 261. Lemoine, M., 2, 359. Lessing's Laocoon, 15 n. 19. Leydig, 101, 103. Lieber, Mr. F., 198, n. 2, 274. Lister, Mr., 101, 201, n. 6. Litchfield, Mr., 89. Lizards, 105. Lock wood, the Rev. S., 87, n. 3. Lorain, M., 74, n. 9. Love, maternal, 78 ; of the opposite sexes, 78 ; expression of, 215 ; kiss- ing, a mark of, 216 ; excites tears, 216. Low spirits, 178. Lubbock, Sir John, 155, 216, n. 22. M. Man, special expressions of, 147. See Expression. Mankind, early history of, 257, n. 6. Marshall, Mr., 155, n. 9, 199, n. 3. Martin, W. L., 133, 137, 140, n. 17. Martius, 319. Matthews, Mr. Washington, 22, 230, 257, 268, 276, 289. Maudsley, Dr., 36, n. 10, 39, n. 14, 245, 342, n. 40. Mauvaise honte, 330. May, Mr. A., 26. ' Me'canisme de la Physionomie Hu- maine,' 33, n. 7. 372 MEDITATION. INDEX. RUMINANTS. Meditation, 228 ; often accompanied by certain gestures, 230. Meyer, Dr. Adolf, 275. Mind, confusion of, while blushing, 323. Modesty, 335. Monkeys, 60 ; power of intercommu- nication and expression of, 60, 88, 96; their special expressions, 1 32 ; pleasure, joy, &c, 132 ; painful emotions, 135 ; anger, 137 ; redden with passion, 138 ; screaming, 140 ; sulkiness in, 140 ; frowning in, 143 ; astonishment, terror in, 144. Moose-deer, the, 113. Moreau, M., 3, 314. Movements, symbolic, 6 ; sympa- thetic, 7. , associated habitual, in the lower animals, 42 ; dogs, 42-45 ; wolves and jackals, 44 ; horses, 45 ; cats, 46 ; chickens, 47 ; sheldrakes, &c, 47, 48. Mowbray on Poultry, 47, n. 18. Muller, Dr. Ferdinand, 20. , Fritz, 12, 29, n. 2, 68, n. 2, 71, n. 6, 268. Music 219. N. Negation, signs of, 273. Nervous system, direct action of the, *66 ; change of colour in the hair, 67, 342 ; trembling of the muscles, 67 ; secretions affected, 68 ; perspi- ration, 73; rage, 74; joy, 75; terror, 77 ; love, 78 ; jealousy, 79 ; grief, 80. Nicol, Mr. Patrick, 14, 185, 300. 0. Ogle, Dr. W., 256, n. 3, 271, 294, 306. Oliphant, Mrs., 80, n. 12, 270. Olmsted, 270. Owen, Professor, 10, n. 13, 87, n. 3, 143, n. 18. P. Paget, Sir J., 68, 117, 312, 342. Pain, outward signs of, in animals, 69 ; in man, 69 ; in the hippopota- mus, 70 ; induces perspiration, 73 ; depression, 81. Parsons, J., 1, n. r. Perspiration caused by pain, 73. Physiology of laughter, 9. ' Physionomie, de la, et des Mouve- ments d'Expression,' 6. Piderit, Dr., 7, 23, 152, 206, 223, 237, 256. Pigs employed to destroy rattlesnakes, 108. Platysma myoides muscle, contraction of the, 298. Plautus, 230. Porcupines, 93. Pouchet, M. G., 67, n. 1. Pride, 263. Psychology, principles of, 9. Puff-adder, the, 105. Pupils, dilatation of the, 303. Q. Queries regarding expression, &c, 15. R. Rabbits, 83, 93, 113. Rage, 74, 240; trembling a conse- quence of, 241 ; Shakespeare's de- scription of, 242 ; snarling with the teeth, 243. Rattlesnake, the, 107, 109. Reade, Mr. Winwood, 21, 279, 289. Reflection, 222 ; deep, generally ac- companied with a frown, 224. Reflex actions, 35. Rejlander, Mr., 23, 148, n. 1, 183, 202, 250. Rengger, 60, 88, 133, n. 11, 137. Resignation, 271. Retching or vomiting, 159. Revenge, 262. Reynolds, Sir J., 208, n. 15. Rhinoceros, 73, 114. Riviere, Mr., 26, 121. Rothrock, Dr., 22, 232, 252, 260. Ruminants, their emotions, 131. SALVIN. INDEX. VOICE. 373 s. Salvin, Mr. F., 44, n. 15. Sandwich islanders, 175. Savage and Wyman, Messrs., 143. Schmalz, 274. Scorn, 254. Scott, Sir W., 121. , Mr. J., 21, 187, 248-250, 260, 267. , Dr. W. R., 62, 3. Scream, as a call for assistance, 91. Secretary-hawk, the, 110. Secretions, affected by strong emo- tions, 68. Senses, the, and the Intellect, 8, n. 8, 31. Shaler, Professor, 107, 109. Shame, gestures of, 321; description of, in Isaiah, Ezra, &c, 322. Sheldrake, the, 47. Shrugging the shoulders, 264. Shyness, 330. Signs of affirmation and negation, 273 ; conventional, 61. Slyness, 263. Smiling, 204, 211; in infants, 212; in savages, 213. Smith, Sir Andrew, 209. Smvth, Mr. Brough, 20, 285, 294. * Snakes, 105-111. Snapping the fingers, 257. Sneering or snarling, 249. Sobbing,, peculiar to the human species, 157. Somerville, 121. Sounds, the emission of, efficient as a means of expression, 83 ; between the sexes, 84 ; to animals when separated, 84 ; of rage, 85 ; the bark of a dog, 85 ; tamed jackals, 86 ; pigeons, 86 ; human voice, 86 ; as a means of courtship, 87 ; music, 89 ; in young infants, 92 ; of sur- prise, contempt, and disgust, 92 ; rabbits, 93 ; porcupines, 93 ; in- sects, 94 ; birds, 94. Speedy, Captain, 22, 261, 268. Spencer, Mr. Herbert, 9, 10, n. 11, 27, n. 1, 71, 86, 200, 227, rc. 5, 263. Sphinx-moth, the humming-bird, 30. Spitting, a sign of disgust, 261. Spix, von, 319. St. John, Mr., 47. Stack, the Rev. J. W., 20, 233, 248. 317. Stuart, Mr., 280. Suffering of body and mind, 147. Sulkiness, 232 ; expression of, prevails throughout the world, 233; in mon- keys, 140; in young orangs, &c, 234. Summary, 348. Surprise, 278. Suspicion, 262. Sutton, Mr., 95, 139, 145, 167, 259. Swinhoe, Mr., 21, 208, 248, 317. Sympathy, 217. T. Taplin, the Rev. George, 20, 187, 247, 321. Taylor, the Rev. R., 156. Tears, cause of the secretion of, 163; laughing, coughing, 164; yawning, 165; reflex action, 170. Tegetmeier, Mr., 100. Tendencies, inherited or instinctive, 30. Tennent, Sir J. Emerson, 167. Terror, 77, 289 ; in an insane woman. 292 ; in murderers, 293 ; dilatation of the pupils, 303. Thwaites, Mr., 167. Tickling, 201. Toads, 104. Trembling, induced by fear, 67 ; by delight, 67 ; by fine music, 68; by rage, 68 ; by terror, 77. Turner, Professor W., 101, n. 18. Tylor, Mr., 61, n. 2, 257, 261, n. 11. V. Vanity, 262. Variation of animals and plants under domestication, 33, n. 8. Vaso-motor system, the, 69. Virchow, 35, n. 9. Voeux, Mr. des, 110, n. 32. Vogt, C, 206, n. 12, 274. Voice, the human, 86. 374 WALLICH. INDEX. YAWNING. w. Wallich, Dr., 23, 202. Weale, Mr. J. P. Mansel, 22, 230, 233, 286. Wedgwood, Mr. Hensleigh, 104, 164, n. 18, 221, 232, n. 10, 241, n. 6, 273. Weeping, 147 ; the period of first shedding tears in infants quite un- certain, 153 ; in savages, 155 ; in the insane, 155; checking or in- creasing the habit of, 156 ; scream- ing and sobbing of infants, 157. See Tears. Weir, Mr. Jenner, 98. West, Mr., 21. Wild-boar, 113. Wilson, Mr., 19. , Mr. Samuel, 20, 320. ' Wissenschaftliches System der Mi- mik und Physiognomik,' 7. Wolf, Mr., 26. Wood, Mr. J., 181, n. 3, 297, 302. , Mr. T. W., 25. Wrinkles, 204. T. Yawning, 134, 165. THE END. THE DESCENT OF MAN, AND SELECTION IN RELATION TO SEX. BY CHAS. DARWIN, M, A., F. R. S. • Two Vols., 12mo. WITH ILLTJSTR ATIOITS. Price, $4.00 In these volumes Mr. Darwin has brought forward all the facts and arguments which science has to offer in favor of the doctrine that man has arisen by gradual development from the lowest point of animal life. He had originally intended this work as a posthumous publication, but the extensive acceptance of the views unfolded in his book on the " Origin of Species " induced him to believe that the public were ripe for the most advanced deductions from his theory of " Natural Selection." Aside from the logical purpose which Mr. Darwin had in view, his work is an original and fascinating contribution to the most interesting portion of natural history. From the London Spectator. "For our part, we find Dr. Darwin's vindication of the origin of man a far more wonderful vindication of Theism than Paley's ' Natural Theology,' though we do not know, so reticent is his style, whether or not he conceives it himself." From the Citizen and Round Table. " Even the charge of atheism, which was so violently urged against Mr. Dar- win, is now rarely heard, and theologians, whose orthodoxy is unquestioned, have ventured to admit that it is possible to believe both in Christianity and the Dar- winian theory at the same time." From the Charleston Courier. "No one can rise from an ordinarily attentive consideration of Mr. Darwin's treatise, without being impressed, not only with the extent and depth of the knowledge which he has attained upon the subject under treatment, and his lomj, unwearied labor in collecting facts, but also with his possession of qualities equally rare— the true scientific temper, the transparent candor, and the truth- eeeking soberness, with which he expresses to you his conclusions, and the pro- cesses by which he reaches them. " Whether you like his discourse or not— though you may refuse to acquiesce In his conclusions — still you are compelled to bear your witness, that this man *ias not been laboring to find facts to support a preconceived theory, but that the 'Jieory is the irrepressible outgrowth of his accumulated facts.' 1 '' From the Evening Bulletin. " This theory is now indorsed by many eminent scientists, who at first com- bated it, including Sir Charles Lyell, probably the most learned of living geolo- gists, and even by a class of Christian divines like Dr. McCosh, who think that certain theories of cosmogony, like the nebular hypothesis and tLe law of evolu- tion, may be accepted without doing violence to faith." Sent free, by mail, to any address in the U. S., on receipt of the price. D. APPLETON & CO., Publishers. JOURNAL OF RESEARCHES INTO THE NATURAL HISTORY AND GEOLOGY Ol" THE COUNTRIES VISITED DURING THE VOYAGE OF H. M. S. BEAGLE BOUND THE WOBLD, UNDER THE COMMAND OF CAPTAIN FITZROY, R. N. By CHARLES DARWIN, M.A., F.R.S., Author of "Origin of Species," etc., etc. One vol., l£2mo. 519 pages. Frice, clotli, $S.OO. " This volume contains, in the form of a journal, a history of our voyage and a sketch of those observations in Natural History and Geology which, I think, will pos- sess some interest for the general reader. 1 '— From the Author's Preface. • " I have too deeply enjoyed the voyage not to recommend any naturalist, although he may not expect to be so fortunate in his companions as I have been, to take all chances, and to start on travels by land if possible, if otherwise, on a long voyage. He may feel assured he will meet with no difficulties or dangers, except in rare cases, nearly so bad as he beforehand anticipates." — Extract. " An intensely interesting work, written in a style that is a model of brevity and clearness."— Wisconsin State Journal. " Darwin was nearly five years on board the Beagle. A keen observer and a genu- ine philosopher, he has brought back to us a precious freight of facts and truths. The work has been some time before the public, and has won a high place among read- ers of every class. It is not so scientific as to be above the comprehension of intel- ligent readers who are not scientific. Some facts and species, new even to the scien- tific, are brought to light. Darwin's transparent, eloquent style richly illuminates his observations. The weightier matters to which we allude are interspersed among more familiar observations, such as would naturally be made by a traveller passing through new and wonderful scenes. It is an instructive and interesting book."— Northwestern Christian Advocate. J>. AFPLETOJN & CO., 549 & 551 Eroadway, New York. THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, By CHARLES DARWIN. A new American edition of "The Origin of Species," from the latest Eng. lish edition, and from an entirely new set of stereotype plates, has just been published, with the author's most recent corrections and additions. In the whole history of the progress of knowledge there is no case so re- markable of a system of doctrines, at first generally condemned as false and absurd, coming into general acceptance in the scientific world in a single decade From the following statements, the reader will infer the estimate that is now placed upon the man and his works by the highest authorities. "Personally and practically exercised in zoology, in minute anatomy, in geology ; a student of geographical distribution, not on maps and in museums only, but by long voyages and laborious collection ; having largely advanced each of these branches of science, and having spent many years in gathering and sifting materials for his present work, the store of accurately-registered facts upon which the author of the 'Origin of Species' is able to draw at will is prodigious." — Prof. T. H. Huxley. "Far abler men than myself may confess that they have not that untiring patience in accumulating, and that wonderful skill in using, large masses of facts of the most varied kind — that wide and accurate physiological knowl- edge — that acuteness in devising, that skill in carrying out experiments, and that admirable style of composition, at once clear, persuasive, and judicial, qualities which, in their harmonious combination, mark out Mr. Darwin as the man, perhaps of all men now living, best fitted for the great work he has undertaken and accomplished." — Alfred Russell Wallace. In Germany these views are rapidly extending. Prof. Giekie, a distin guished British geologist, attended the recent Congress of German Natural- ists and Physicians, at Innspruck, in which some eight hundred savant* were present, and thus writes : "What specially struck me was the universal sway which the writings of Darwin now exercise over the German mind. You see it on every side, in private conversation, in printed papers, in all the many sections into which such a meeting as that at Innspruck divides. Darwin's name is often men- tioned, and always with the profoundest veneration. But even where no al- lusion is specially made to him, nay, even more markedly, where such allusion is absent, we see how thoroughly his doctrines have permeated the scientific mind, even in those departments of knowledge which might seem at first sight to be farthest from natural history. 'You are still discussing in Eng- land,' said a German friend to me, ' whether or not the theory of Darwin cun be true. We have got a long way beyond that here. His theory is now our (jommoD starting-point.' And, so far as my experience went, I found it to be so." D. APPLETON