REMARKS ON GUSH CHURCH 8fC. 8fC. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/remarksonenglishOOmark MONUMENT IN COLYTON CHURCH, DEVONSHIRE. REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, AND ON THE EXPEDIENCY OF RENDERING &£pultf)ral JWemonab SUBSERVIENT TO PIOUS AND CHRISTIAN USES. BY J. H. MARKLAND, F.R.S, & S.A. Man. is a noble animal, splendid in ashes, and pompous in the grave, solemnizing nativities and deaths with equal lustre. Sib T. Browne, Hydriotaphia, ch. v. THE THIRD EDITION, ENLARGED. OXFORD. JOHN HENRY PARKER ; G. F. AND J. RIVINGTON, LONDON ; SIMMS AND SON, POCOCK, AND COELINGS, BATH. MDCCCXLIII. WHAT ADVANTAGETH A GORGEOUS TOMB — COSTLY OBSEQUIES LAVISH EXPENSE ! BEFOREHAND THEN ARRAY THYSELF FOR THY BURIAL — GODLINESS IS A COMELY SHROUD — DECK THY- SELF IN ALL THY ROBES ERE THOU DEPARTEST HENCE — CONVERT THY WEALTH INTO AN ENDURING ORNAMENT — CARRY IT ALONG WITH THEE. ST. BASH,, Homilia in Ditescentes (folio), Parisiis, 1638, torn. i. p. 348. Oxford : printed by I. Shrimpton. TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE EDWARD HERBERT, EARL OF POWIS, VISCOUNT CLIVE OF LUDLOW, BARON HERBERT OF CHERBURY, AND BARON POWIS OF POWIS CASTLE : IN MUNIFICENCE, IN ZEAL, IN STEADFASTNESS, A FAITHFUL AND DEVOTED SON OF THE CHURCH : THESE PAGES ARE INSCRIBED, WITH DEEP FEELINGS OF RESPECT AND ESTEEM, AND WITH THE FERVENT HOPE THAT HEALTH, AND PEACE, AND LENGTH OF DAYS, MAY BE THE PORTION OF HIS INHERITANCE. b THE PRESENT EDITION. In giving another Edition of these Remarks to the Public, the Author has endeavoured to fortify his opinions by additional arguments, as well as by new proofs and illustrations. No one can rejoice more than himself, that the solicitude for the care and restoration of our Ecclesiastical Edifices has now become so general and so earnest. It must be a matter of congratulation to all, that the highest Dignitary of our Church regards with favour and approval this increase of intelligence and good taste a . So long as they are subsidiary to the a " I am glad to find, that the feeling in respect to this important subject, (Church Architecture,) which has of late years revived in Eng- land, has been awakened in Ireland. It is naturally connected with a strong religious feeling, combined with attachment to the Church. " That such feelings, in regard to essentials, may continue to increase, and produce their natural effect in drawing attention to matters, which, though altogether subordinate, can never be considered as unimportant, whilst they promote reverence for holy things, is my constant prayer."— Letter, addressed by his Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury to the Lord Bishop of Down. Nov. 19th, 1842. c o Viii PREFACE. two great objects, for which Christians assemble in the House of Prayer — devotion and instruction — the wise and good can refuse neither their sanction nor support, to any efforts, which are made for the attainment of those most important ends. England, — let it be thankfully said, — is again a Church- Building Country : and may she so continue, until she shall have provided the means of Divine Worship for every son and daughter of her immense population, who wish to abide in the Faith of her Apostolic Church. Amongst many gratifying results, which have attended the publication of this Work, the Author cannot omit to mention, that the Bath and Wells Diocesan Church Building Association have, in their last Report, cordially expressed their approval of his suggestions. The more effectually also to promote their adoption, the Committee have stated their readi- ness to receive, and appropriate, any sums, which may, in furtherance of these views, be placed at their disposal. The Author has to renew his especial acknow- ledgments to his excellent Friend, the Archdeacon of St. Alban's, for the patient kindness, and the judg- ment, which have been again exercised by him in C o O— — — o PREFACE. ix revising this Work. His thanks are also due to the Rev. William Sewell, B.D., of Exeter College, for the loan of a large Collection of Engravings of Monu- ments, and still more for his valuable counsel. To Mr. Wailes, of Newcastle on Tyne, he is in- debted for a Print of the Monumental Window in Chichester Cathedral, erected at the expense of the Dean of Chichester. From the list of similar Works, which either have been erected, or are in prepara- tion, the reader will perceive, that this good example has been extensively followed in that and other Churches b . To the Friends, who have contributed several of the Drawings, which have been engraved for this Volume, the Author's thanks would have been indi- vidually expressed, were he not aware, how little acceptable so public a tribute would have proved to the Contributors themselves. Bath, Easter, 1843. b Memorial Windows have also been executed by that excellent Artist Mr. Willement, and many more are in preparation by that gentleman, and others, who are distinguished for their skill in this beautiful branch of art, I CD- CD The Plates, in a great measure/ speak for themselves, and require little explanation. Frontispiece. — An Altar-tomb in the parish Church of Colyton, Devonshire, upon which are placed the effigies of a young female, with a coronet on her head, her pillow sup- ported by an Angel, and a dog at her feet. Of this Monu- ment, and the Lady to whom it is dedicated, Cleveland, in his Genealogical History of the family of Courtenay% gives the following account : — " The Lady Catherine, (seventh) daughter of Edward IV., b had, by her husband William Courtenay Earl of Devonshire, one son named Henry, who was, after his father, Earl of Devonshire, and afterwards Marquess of Exeter, and one daughter named Margaret, who was choaked with a bone of a fish, and died at Colecomb very young ; and there is a Monu- ment of an antique figure still remaining for her in the Parish Church of Coliton, where her Effigies is put at full length, in a niche of the north wall, with an Angel at her 3 Exeter 1735, folio. b This Lady is described upon her seal as " filia, soror, et amita regum." — Sandford's Genealogical History, p. 419. O o Q— di ILLUSTRATIONS. head, and another at her feet c ; and over are 1st. the Arms of Courtenay, impaled with the Arms of England ; 2nd. the Arms of Courtenay, of themselves ; 3rd. the Arms of England of themselves ; and the He where this Monument is placed, is called Choke Bone He to this day." The Cornice on this Monujfcnt, is modern, and in bad taste, and, in the engravin^nt has been replaced by one better harmonizing with the original design. The same restoration has been effected on a. tomb, which has been lately erected in the Church of Powderham ; this beautiful specimen of a sepulchral memorial, having been selected, most appropriately, as the model. Page 5. — The venerable Pulpit at ColdAshton, in Glou- cestershire, is one of the small number still remaining of this class of antiquities, to which attention has here been directed. The pulpit itself is of wood, the canopy of stone ; it is not only disused, but the very access to it is closed up. Why is it not carefully repaired, and restored to its original use ? Tradition says, and not without much probability, that it was occasionally filled by Latimer. While he held the Benefice of West Kington, in Wiltshire, his labours were not confined to his own Parish ; — for we are told, that "the pulpits every where were gladly opened for him," and that he often preached at Bristol. In journey- ing from West Kington to that City, Latimer would necessarily pass through Cold Ashton. The print at p. 29, is taken from a work, entitled, " True information of the beginning and cause of all our Troubles, how they have bin hatched, and how pre- c On either upright, is an angel in flowing drapery, waving a censer ; to these the writer probably alludes, when he speaks of angels at the head and feet. O -o o o ILLUSTRATIONS. xtii vented. — London, 1648." — It is thus noticed under the year 1640 d — "The Soldiers, in their passage to Yorke, turn unto Eeformers, pull down popish pictures, hreak down rayles, turn Alters into Tables, and those popish Commanders, that were to command them, they forced to eat flesh on Fridayes, thrusting it downe their throats, and some they slew." We have here a graphic, and not very agreeable, picture of the proceedings of the advocates for civil and religious freedom in the seventeenth century ; — or, as we might, with greater truth, style them, of " the adversary, and the enemy, when they entered into the Gates of our Jerusalem" — Lamentations, iv. 12. The print at p. 41, represents the modernized Chancel of the fine Church of St. Cuthbert, at Wells. The east window is entirely blocked up, and the transmutations in the Chancel, from good to bad, have been complete. When we contrast the panelled oak roof, that remains in the Nave, of which a specimen is here given, with the d For this communication I am indebted to M. H. Bloxam, Esq. o XIV ILLUSTRATIONS. ceiling in the Chancel, and reflect, that the extensive injury to this part of the Church, must have heen at- tended with considerahle labour and expense, we cannot but feel amazed, that, in a literary and refined age, the eyes of our forefathers should, in works of Architecture, have been so thoroughly blinded. It has been stated, that, had the funds been sufficient, the roof of the Nave would have shared the fate of that in the Chancel. Surely we ought, in candour and fairness, to shift the date of " the dark ages," as they have been termed, from the days, when Cathedrals were built, to much later periods. During large portions of the 17th and 18th centuries, bad taste was exhibited not only, as we shall see, in the de- signs, and in the position, of monuments, but in a total absence of feeling for all, that was truly beautiful and sublime. To take one instance, not connected with Churches — Bishop Kennet, when speaking, in 1707, of that fine specimen of Baronial splendour, Haddon Hall, in Derbyshire, describes it, — " as a house of no front, no uniform figure, no good avenue on any side, no manner of prospect, no walks or gardens, and, to all appearance, nothing but strength and privacy : — no manner of beauty in it e ." Our thanks are due to the noble possessor of this most interesting structure, that, whilst it is carefully pre- served in essentials, the hand of the improver is not per- mitted to mar its original character. It is to be wished that the inside of the Chapel should not be longer per- mitted to remain in its present neglected state. At the eastern extremity of the north aisle of Bristol Cathedral was an Altar-screen, which is given amongst Mr. Skelton's Etchings of the Antiquities of Bristol. The e Restituta, by Sir E. Brydges, vol. iii. p. 362. O o c ILLUSTRATIONS. XV monument of the Codrington Family (p. 60), which was formerly placed in the Choir, has been intruded into this beautiful series of niches. It is but justice to say, that it was not the original cause of the mischief, as its present place was occupied by a lofty, pyramidal monument, erected in 1789. When the latter was removed, it is much to be regretted, that the same good taste, which directed the restorations, effected in the Choir, was not extended to this part of the Cathedral. The monument of Sir John Young (p. 61), erected about 1603, has probably destroyed the ancient Sedilia in the south wall of the Choir of Bristol Cathedral. At p. 62 is given an existing portion of one of the small Chapels, surrounding the eastern extremity of Henry the Seventh's Chapel, that we may be the better aware of the ravages committed by the erection of the Duke of Buck- inghamshire's monument. The sculptor, doubtless, re- garded the niches, the statues, brackets, &c, &c, which he was permitted to destroy, with the same feeling of con- tempt, that Evelyn f expressed, when speaking of the "Lace, and other cutwork, and crinkle-crankle" of this building, and considered, that these appropriate and beautiful orna- ments were wisely sacrificed to receive the Koman General, — the weeping Duchess, and the allegorical Group. At p. 66, a proof is exhibited, that the injury, occasioned by the erection of monuments, is not confined to the in- terior of a Church. This Chapel terminates the northern aisle of the Church of Lacock, Wilts. It is a highly deco- rated building of a late period. The walls and roof were richly painted, and the edifice, generally speaking, is in f Evelyn's Miscell. Works, p. 266. This expression has been attri- buted erroneously to the younger Wren. •0 o -o Xvi ILLUSTRATIONS. good preservation, but two large monuments occupy nearly the whole of the north wall, and, in order to receive them, two of the three windows in this small Chapel have been entirely blocked up. These monuments were raised to the memory of Sir William Sherington, Knt., who died in 1566, and of John Talbot, who died in 1713. We may hope, that these intruders will, ere long, be placed in some other part of the Church. The mullions, which still remain in one of these windows, will enable the restoration of both to be effected with little difficulty. P. 82. This plate presents a glimpse into the north Tran- sept of Bath Abbey Church. It has been given, not to ridicule, whatever the hand of affection may have placed there, but as a striking illustration of that which has been, not incorrectly, described as " Monumental patchwork on the walls of Churches ; — marble excrescences ; — sepul- chral fungi; — stone tumours*." We see here how the fair proportions, symmetry, and effect of a fine Church may be diminished, and injured by the indiscriminate accumula- tion of monuments and tablets, when its walls become " tesselated with closely packed slabs of many colours V The monument of the Moore Family (p. 90), erected in 1613, in the north aisle of the Nave of Worcester Cathedral, is comparatively a slight blemish, but it affords an early instance of the small regard, paid to windows in Churches. Their partial, or entire obstruc- tion has been little heeded, if a convenient space was thus created for the reception of a monument. The Plate at p. 224 represents the Bible used by the officiating Minister, in the Chapel of the Holy Evangelists, at Killerton, Devonshire ; and it is accompanied by a b Brit. Critic, No. xxxiii. p. 79. h Ibid. p. 101. ILLUSTRATIONS. Prayer Book, similar to it in all respects. These Books are bound in boards of three quarters of an inch in thick- ness, each with two clasps, and eight corner pieces, simple in character, and of great solidity. They were bound, — as the kind friend to whom I owe this drawing informs me, — by Mr. Tuckett (binder to the British Museum) chiefly after the model of a copy of Bartholomeus, De proprietatibus rerum. The gophering, on the edges, cor- responds, in pattern, with the tooling on the sides. Such is the massiveness of the binding, that the Bible weighs 391bs. Might not Church Furniture, like these volumes, be occasionally selected as more durable and useful me- morials of the dead, than Tablets ? c o Page Remarks on English Churches, and on Sepulchral Memo- rials 1 Appendix: — I. Epitaphs 141 II. Monuments. Interments in Churches 173 III. Church-yard Crosses 187 Church Building and Endowments for Churches . . . .191 Provision for the Repair and Improvement of Churches . . 200 Alms-giving in Churches 206 Substitutes for Sepulchral Memorials 224 Index 239 o o- •o ENGLISH CHURCHES, Turrets, spires, And windows, climbing high from base to roof In wide and radiant rows, bespoke its birth Coeval with those rich Cathedral fanes, (Gothic ill-named,) where harmony results From disunited parts ; and shapes minute, At once distinct and blended, boldly form One vast majestic whole. No modern art Had marr'd with misplac'd symmetry the pile. Mason's English Garden, B. iii. Amongst the glories of our native land our Cathe- drals and Churches claim the most distinguished rank, whether we regard their magnificence — their variety — their numbers, — and still more the sacred uses, to which they are devoted. Which of the works of o o 2 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, man awakens in the mind so many holy and solemn, yet soothing recollections? Which adds so impres- sively to the beauties of a landscape ? I n cities the Cathedral Church rises in awful majesty, and is the absorbing object, to which the delighted eye per- petually returns, while the buildings around it seem but as humble vassals in the presence of their mighty lord. If less considerable in magnitude and splen- dour, scarcely less beautiful and attractive is the Village Church, with its taper spire, pointing to that Heaven, whither it would conduct us ; or, with its massive well-proportioned Tower, its Chancel, Aisles, and Porch gracefully projecting from the lofty Nave, its windows filled with delicate and beautiful tracery, and the whole structure crowned with light well- executed pinnacles. These are not uncommon fea- tures in our Ecclesiastical edifices, and never should we gaze upon them but with the devoutest feelings of gratitude and veneration. Thomson, when enu- merating the nobler works of creation, specifies the Church as the sole work of art, worthy of. being united to them : The forest darkening round, the glittering spire, The ethereal mountain, and the distant main a . :1 Spring, p. 531. — The reader may remember the picture, which is presented to the eye in the grounds of Wilton, where the Cathedral of Salisbury, with its lofty spire, has been most judiciously introduced. AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 3 With shame and sorrow we must confess, that, during the largest portion of the last two centuries, the greater number of these fabrics has been grossly- neglected ; and, in the concern for their preservation, our piety and our taste alike slumbered. Until late years how few of those, who assembled within the walls of our Churches, have appeared to appreciate these precious gifts of their ancestors ! How few have been mindful to cherish with care and reverence the " goodly fanes," which the munificence of former days has bequeathed to them ! To men, zealous for the honour of God, there are few sadder sights than the neglected Church, presenting, amidst vestiges of its former splendour, and of the holy purposes of its dedication, plain proofs of tasteless ignorance, if not of indecent disrespect, enough to " sear the eye and grieve the heart." A chill oftentimes per- vades the building, so that " the tender and delicate woman" amongst us may, with reason, hesitate to " adventure to set the sole of her foot" upon the damp ground, or broken pavement. Not now to speak of the Font and the Altar, when we look around us, where shall we not find cause for cen- sure and regret? We see the mullions of the win- dows broken, the few remaining relics of painted glass disjointed or obscured, and the windows them- selves partially filled with brick and common case- o o 4 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, ments b . Whatever of sculptured ornament once existed has been industriously clogged by successive coats of whitewash, and the outline of the arches and windows has been picked out with yellow or black borders. Large unmeaning monuments and tablets are seen partially intercepting the light, or covering panels, pillars, and pilasters. Where the Commandments, Creed, and texts of Scripture have found their place, no attention to propriety has been observed, but the village painter has smeared the Chancel-arch, and other portions of the walls, with vulgar lettering, extravagant borders, and ornaments fitted only for the sign-post. When we cross the threshold, and pass into the area of the building, we are made too sensible that the world is not shut out. The original massive oak benches, on which the rich and poor could once sit together, have been either entirely swept away, or mutilated, past repair, to admit mean and high unpainted deal pews, the unhappy legacy of our Puritan forefathers. These inclosures, sometimes small in themselves, embody, alas! too much of pride, exclusiveness, and sloth. b Mr. Streatfeild, speaking of the glass in Hawkhurst Church, Kent, says that an examination of it cost him some labour, " for its constituted guardians had found the bricklayer less chargeable than the glazier, and had shut out the weather with mortar, applied by no delicate hand to the once storied heads of its windows."— Prospectus of a History of Kent, p. 4. O ■ — O o- o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 5 They become still more unsightly, from being occa- sionally dislocated when burials are improperly per- mitted to take place beneath them. The reading and clerk's desks, often of gigantic size and of paltry materials, obscure the chancel, and form a striking contrast to the ancient grave coloured pulpit of carved stone, sometimes remaining, and which, if properly restored, would be an ornament to the building. To point out these defects is an ungrateful, but not a useless, theme, but, before the mischief and neglect of past years can be remedied, the whole extent of the evil must be fully and clearly de- tailed. From the days, when Inigo Jones prefixed a Roman portico, magnificent as it was, to the old Cathedral of St. Paul, and thrust a screen of the same style into the Cathedral of Winchester, to a very recent period, purity of design and character in our Ecclesiastical buildings, seems to have been well- nigh banished from the land. Batty Langley made bad worse ; for he, that could admire and adopt his barbarisms, would not have scrupled to deface York Minster, had it been entrusted to his hands . Justly is it remarked by Dr. Ingram, that "the modern o " Many a fine Minster has, from bad taste, been robbed of its native character, and many a parish Church degraded beneath the level of the barns that surround it." See the valuable observations of the Rev. Gr. A. Poole, in his useful work on Church Architecture, page 11. O O o o 6 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, mode of adorning our ancient edifices has done more, under injudicious management, to disfigure and obli- terate the memorials of past ages, than the slow ravages of time, or the barbarous devastations of popular fury d ." Time was, when a building, con- secrated to God, was considered as an object of the deepest religious veneration. The good work was eagerly promoted by munificent gifts or by personal exertion. Land, stone, and timber, as well as money, were freely given ; workmen and carriages were no less freely provided. These contributions should be estimated as money, for it is idle to say, that such structures could be erected with ease, because wages in those days were low e . If our ancestors wanted our science and our numerous aids for curtailing labour, we must contrast the purer taste and the more liberal spirit, which animated the builders of old, with the cold and selfish calculation too often manifested in modern times. Our profusion has been freely lavished on schemes and undertakings, which are to yield us a profitable return, or to conduce to our individual comfort, too rarely on works of charity or devotion. In examining a fine Church of the thirteenth or four- teenth century, where we mark the enduring (might d Memorials of Oxford, vol. i. p. 7. e Whitaker's Richmondshire, Preface, p. vi. o ; O AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 7 we not almost say the eternal) workmanship of those periods, nothing strikes us more than the ample space, allotted to the several portions of the building, or the minute and painful labour, which was bestowed upon every part of the edifice, whether the material was wood or stone. This labour was not confined exclusively to those portions of a Church, that were most important and conspicuous ; but it extended to parts, which can only be discovered, and properly appreciated after the closest investigation. "The roofs of Cathedrals generally deserve quite as narrow an inspection as the interiors ; and the inspection is often as full of wonder as that of the inside f ." Even in the crypts, architectural propriety and beauty pre- vail ; the extent of which cannot, perhaps, be fully known, " till the ruin of the incumbent edifice shall have exposed its subterranean foundation to the light of day s." In the Chapel of St. Joseph at Glaston- bury, not only are the pillars and fine groining of the crypt deserving of minute examination, but the very arch that covers the well in the lowest depth, and the obscurest corner, is gracefully formed and ornamented with a moulding of good character. There is a win- dow in Exeter Cathedral, which can only be viewed from the roof, but it is finished with as much care, as f Faber's Foreign Churches and Peoples. g Transactions of the Cambridge Camden Society. Pt. i. p. 21. o 6 o o 8 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, if it were exposed on one of the main fronts of the Church. When we find in a petty village, a substantial spa- cious Church, with its noble tower, and, though in decay, still bearing evidence, that no pains or suitable embellishment was spared in its construction; it might be asked, by whom, at whose expense, for whom, and for what useful object was all this cost ? Such questions, natural to the utilitarian of our own days, were never put by our forefathers, — They knew that the act was one of grateful homage on their part to the Giver of all Good; that the building must be beneficial to the inhabitants of the District, how- ever few and scattered they might be ; and would confer blessings on generations yet unborn ; they knew that they had " wrought a good work ;" — this truth was enough to silence every enquirer — to satisfy every doubt : They dreamt not of a perishable home, Who thus could build. Where the hand of man has not been mischievously busy, and only ordinary attention has been paid to the repair of accidental injury, we may contemplate, in one of these fabrics, what their Founders themselves beheld, and much in the same state. " Let us then be grateful for such works, the ornaments and the o -o o- o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 9 pride of our country ; to that Church, which, however great its defects, or rather its superfluities, neither grudged expense, nor toil, nor privations, in pro- viding these durable and magnificent buildings h ." When a Church was completed, not only each Chan- try, but every principal part of the edifice, had its appointed guardian. These feelings of devotion were too often mingled with superstition : yet well would it have been, had the good part been spared, and that, whilst the tares were gathered, the wheat had not been rooted up also ! At the Reformation, the condition of the Churches themselves was, probably, excellent ; and here it may not be irrelevant to point out the actual extent of injury, which they then sustained. Much misconcep- tion prevails by confounding the proceedings, w T hich occurred at this period, with that ruthless violence, to which Churches were subjected in a subsequent cen- tury. A short statement will shew, that the spolia- tion at these two periods of our history, differed widely both in kind and degree. As regards the Churches themselves, the object of the Reformers was, generally speaking, to purify, not to desecrate, while, on the other hand, the Puritans were not satisfied, unless desecration was accompanied by demolition. But when we turn to the Monastic h Whitaker's Richmondshire, vol. ii. p. 128. O O o — o 10 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, houses, it is to be lamented, that at their Dissolution, they were not only stripped of their lands and re- venues, but their roofs were shamefully dismantled, and the lead, bells, and whatever other property or articles of value they possessed, were seized upon or destroyed. The Certificate of the Commissioners for the Suppression of the Monastery of Tewkesbury, will give the reader a clear insight into the usual mode of proceeding on such occasions. The Abbot's lodging, and other buildings of a domestic character were " assigned to remain undefaced," doubtless, as a re- sidence for the Grantee or his dependants. The Church, Chapels, Cloisters, Chapter- House, &c, were " deemed to be superfluous " The lead and bells ' l were estimated by weight for sale. The jewels, plate, and ornaments, were "reserved to the use of the King's Majesty k ." Instances also occur, where individuals, like the Protector Somerset, actually destroyed a Church for selfish purposes; and vast ' " England had been largely replenished with bell-metal since the Dissolution, and vast quantities of it were shipped off for gain." In 1547 this was prohibited, lest the enemy might be supplied with it "for great guns against ourselves, and our own country and army want." Strype's Mem., vol. ii. pt. i. p. 71. t Burnet's Reformation, vol. i. pt. ii. p. 234. The purchasers of Reli- gious Houses delayed not often in pulling down the edifices, " particularly the Churches and Chapels, that they, no longer subsisting in the eyes of the people, might be the sooner forgotten by them." Bentham's Ely, p. 190. O : O o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 11 Conventual Churches, even when preserved and granted to the use of the parish, were diminished in size. No friend of his country could desire, that the monastic estates should have remained in mortmain. Had such been the case, would England, at this day, have stood higher amongst European nations than Spain or Portugal ? But of the £161,000 per annum, (the revenue of the greater Abbeys,) how very small a portion was reserved for objects of public utility ! A limited part of their revenues might have been re- tained for the support of some of the fabrics them- selves, or of portions of them, and these might have been rendered subservient to pious and charitable uses. We should not have deemed " a glut of Pre- bendaries and Schoolmasters essential for the benefit of religion or learning V' hut are we not now made fully sensible that the nation would have been mate- rially benefited had the twenty additional Sees m , once 1 Hallam's Constit. Hist., vol. i. p. 107. m The number of places for the intended Bishoprics, made out in the King's own hand, and amounting to twenty-one, will be found in Strype's Memorials, vol. i. pt. ii. No. cvi. Of these, Peterborough is the only place that now possesses a Bishop. The other four Sees, Glouces- ter, Bristol, Oxford, and Chester, erected out of the ruins of dissolved monasteries, are not included. These would have made a total of twenty- five additional Sees. The king also made out a list of new deaneries and colleges, No. cvii. Strype justly observes, that the Church, having more Bishops, "the flock of Christ would be the better regarded. — But alas! these many new Bishoprics and Deaneries, at first so well intended, Q O o -o 12 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, designed by Henry VIII, been erected out of the and solitary, as Malvern, Whalley, and Glastonbury, retained their Priories and Abbeys as seats of educa- tion and religious retirement, under prudent manage- ment and judicious regulations 11 ? From such semi- naries scholars might have emanated widely differing from the ignorant and unlettered Clergy, who, at a most critical moment, were called upon to uphold the Anglican Church, in the eyes of a people, not too well disposed to regard it with favour. Why Libraries should have been recklessly de- stroyed at the Reformation does seem astonishing ; classical literature was then extending itself ; our dwindled away at last to six (five?) Bishoprics only,'' (Strype's Memo- rials, vol. i. p. 540.) a striking proof how widely men often vary in their promises, and in the performance of them, when their own interests are concerned. u Latimer "moved the Lord Cromwell in behalf of the priory of Malvern, to continue not in Monkery, God forbid ! but to main- tain preaching, study with praying, and good house-keeping. The country is poor, and full of penury." — Strype's Memorials, vol. i. pt. i. p. 400. ° A reference to the Life of Richard Coxe, Dean of Christ Church, (Wood's Athen. Oxon., Ed. Bliss, vol. i. p. 466,) may suffice to shew us the ravages then committed in libraries. Old chronicles were mutilated, as the portraits of kings and warriors were supposed to represent saints and popes. At Malmsbury, which possessed some of the finest manuscripts in the kingdom, broken windows were actually patched with portions of them, and for many years after the dissolution bakers had not consumed the stores, which they had accumulated for heating their ovens. — Bodl. Letters, vol. i. p. 279. Abbey lands, and had places, comparatively secluded o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 13 Universities were not only spared but enlarged, and Professorships were founded in them. "The same reverence, says Sir J. Mackintosh, which spared their monastic regulations, happily preserved their rich en- dowments from rapine P." What would we now give, had Bale's wish been realized, that " in every shire of England there had been one solemn library for the preserving the noble works of men, godly-minded, and lively memorials of our nation 1." In a sensible letter from Hearne to Browne Willis r (which, as the Editor justly remarks, does no less credit to Hearne's heart than his head), the writer observes, that the Reformation " extirpated those gross errors, which had, by degrees, crept into the Church/' but that " the nation groans to this day" by the demolition of the religious houses, and by the mode in which their lands and revenues were seized upon. We must readily admit the truth of this last observation, when we look at the miserable manner in which the existing Conventual Churches are endowed. The most important changes, that were effected in Churches at the Reformation, were within the build- ings. The interior of them, accordingly, it may be p History of the Reformation, p. 135. i Strype's Life of Parker, vol. ii. p. 521. * Bodleian Letters, vol. i. p. 272. 14 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, remarked, is often more mutilated than the outside, which has been exposed to less rude treatment. The stone Altars, especially those in Mortuary Chapels, were destroyed. " Images, shrines, and candlesticks, were to be removed everywhere, wheresoever they had been abused by pilgrimages, censings, and offer- ings. " As the first Injunctions had been but partially obeyed, Inquiries were to be made in 1547, "whe- ther there do remain, not taken down in Churches, Chapels, or elsewhere, any misused images, with pilgrimages, cloths, stones, shoes, offerings, kiss- ings, candlesticks, trindals of wax, and such other like ? And whether there do remain, not defaced and destroyed, any shrines, coverings of shrines, or any other monuments of idolatry, superstition, and hypo- crisy 8 ?" Again, it was subsequently enjoined that all images graven, carved, or painted, should be re- moved. Thus we see, that image-worship was the besetting sin, so far as respected externals, against which our Reformers chiefly, and w 7 isely, directed their attacks. This was the foul abuse to be extirpated, and the de- struction of whatsoever fostered it was with them the primary object. Our ancestors could not be blinded, any more than we at the present day, to the truth, that the Virgin, the Saints, and Angels, constitute, s Strype's Memorials, vol. ii. pt. i. p. 77. 124. o -o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 15 as it were, a polytheism most popular in the Romish Church * ; and that acts of worship and adoration were paid to them, justifying the charge of superstition and creature-worship u . " Had images and relics been in themselves as sacred, as venerable, and as authentic as the Brazen Serpent in the wilderness, yet when they became, like that most holy relic, objects of supersti- tious adoration, the fathers of our Reformation piously and wisely followed the example of the good King 1 There can be no misunderstanding the following passages from the work of an Augustine Friar of the fifteenth century : Theophyl — " So folwyd hys mastrysse dorothye And cam to cryst in blysse regnynge Whedyr thorgh hyr merytys he mote us bryg." . . . " Now blyssyd Agas wych in hevene on hy Crounyd as a quene wyth joye and blys Lyvyst and regnyst as wurthy ys And eve more shait wy* owtyn ende Purchace us gee or we hens wende." . . . " She put hyr (viz. Elizabeth of Hungary) in our ladyis pteccyoun Hyr mekely besechyng hyr advocate to be." Lyvys of Seyntys, translated by Osbern Bokenam, circa 1447, [printed from a MS. in the Arundel Collection, No. 327, and presented to the Roxburghe Club by the Earl of Powis], pp. 143, 256, 276. u Consult Hallam's Constit. Hist. Engl., vol. i. p. 116; Southey, Vind. Eccles. Angl., p. 450. " The Council of Trent (says Bossuet) endeavoured to guard against this danger by their doctrine, but our Church acted more piously and charitably in removing a practice, which we knew by expe- rience could not be generally purified from idolatry, though the better informed might use it without committing that dreadful sin." Palmer on the Church, vol. i. p. 518. O- o 16 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, Hezekiah, in destroying them x ." But although it must be admitted, that, in too many instances, the Royal Order for destruction was exceeded, and " was executed with a rigour, which lovers of art and anti- quity have long deplored V still the fabrics of Cathe- drals and Churches were generally respected. So far was Elizabeth from encouraging any needless de- molition in the interior of the Churches, that, in the second year of her reign, (1560,) Archbishop Parker procured Letters under the Great Seal to certain Commissioners, "to take remedies about decays of Churches and the unseemly keeping of Chancels, and for the comely ordering the east parts of the Churches. " The Archbishop animadverts on the neglect "in many Churches, and especially Chancels, in keeping them decent, which betrayed so much want of re- verence for the places, where God is served." Amongst the Articles to be enquired of in the Me- tropolitan Visitation in all Cathedral and Collegiate Churches in 1560, the following queries occur: " Whether you have necessary Ornaments and Books for the Church ? Whether your Church be sufficiently x "A few Thoughts on the Interior Arrangement of Churches, by the Dean of Exeter," p. 24. y Hallam ut supra. True it is, that oftentimes the Injunctions, given to the Commissioners in the reigns of Henry VIII., Edward VI., and Elizabeth, for removing shrines and superstitious relics, were carried to excess more from sacrilegious avarice, than from zeal for the glory of God, and the advancement of true religion. Bentham's Ely, p. 42. ■0 o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 17 repaired in all parts ? What stock or annuity is there toward the reparation of the Cathedral Church 2 ?" Elizabeth ascended the throne under trying cir- cumstances. The great object with herself and her most confidential advisers was, as Burnet states, "to unite the whole nation into one way of religion and the Queen and her Ministers must not be hastily ac- cused of temporizing policy, either because she re- tained a large number of Romanists in the Privy Council, or opposed sudden and violent innovations in the work of reformation. In protesting against the gross errors of the Church of Rome, Elizabeth's sincerity is placed beyond all doubt by the general correspondence of her measures, with those adopted by her deceased brother. The Proclamation issued by the Queen, on her Accession, was most judicious. Preaching, by which " unfruitful disputes in matters of religion among the common sort" arose, was for- bidden. The resistance of the Romanists to the pro- posed changes, and the discontent of those who held extreme opinions on the other side, were clearly fore- seen. The latter, " when they shall see, per adven- ture, that some old Ceremonies shall be left still, or that their doctrine is not allowed and commanded only, and all other abolished and disproved, shall be 2 Strype's Life of Parker, vol. i. p. 148. 18 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, discontented, and call the alteration a cloaked papistry or a mingle mangle a ." The wisdom of those, who chiefly guided the mighty movement of the Reformation, and achieved this great blessing, was in many respects most con- spicuous. Knox, indeed, emphatically says, that " what was then done, was wisdom itself. The actors were Cranmer and Ridley, both amazingly formed for their respective purposes, the former the man of power at court, the latter of business in the study ; but even that will not sufficiently account for what they accom- plished. He, who destined them to their work, most evidently guided them in it b ." " The Reformers puri- fied religion of all the gross corruptions, with which Rome had polluted it, and retaining only that which, as they thought, could allowably be retained, offered so little violence to old feelings, that more outcry was raised against them by the zealots of the Reforma- tion, than by the Roman Catholics themselves. In reality the effect of the outward and visible forms, which were retained, was such, that, during the first years of Elizabeth, the Roman Catholics very gene- rally frequented the English Service; and of what advantage this must have been to the new Establish- ment, will be apparent to all, who know how much a Strype's Annals, vol. i. pt. ii. pp. 391, 394. b Knox's Remains, vol. iii. p. 53. o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 19 more we are the creatures of habit than of reason ." It was, to use the language of Bishop Hall, "the overcasting of the ancient stones, with untempered mortar of new inventions, that displeased us/' in re- moving which we happily neither disturbed the foun- dation, nor injured the walls. Still, the Queen herself, though she avowed her own conscientious preference of the Reformed Church, might think that the Refor- mation was, in some points, carried too far. One of her most marked qualities, according to Dr. Cardwell, was, "a reverence for old observances. Her judg- ment and her passions were equally engaged in resist- ing the progress of innovation d ." She considered that in the Romish system there were many good institu- tions and practices and feelings which might have been advantageously retained e , and that the remains of original Catholicity within that Church should not have been offensive to any sound Churchman. Would that our scrupulous Sires had dared to leave Less scanty measure of those graceful rites And usages, whose due return invites A stir of mind too natural to deceive ; c Quarterly Review, vol. x. p. 94. Heber's Life of Jer. Taylor, p.cxx. d Hist, of Conferences, Introd., p. 16. e A late distinguished writer has given it as his opinion that " it would be most desirable to restore many of these institutions, practices and feelings, amongst ourselves." Arnold's Sermons on Christian Life, Introduction, p. lvi. [But, in doing so, how much of wisdom and prudence should be exercised !] O O 20 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, Giving the memory help, when she would weave A crown for Hope ! I dread the "boasted lights, That all too often are hut fiery blights, Killing the hud, o'er which in vain we grieve £. According to Neal, Elizabeth " affected a middle way between Popery and Puritanism, though more in- clined to the former ; disliking the secular preten- sions of the Court of Rome over foreign States, though she was in love with the pomp and splendour of their worship ; on the other hand, she approved of the doctrines of the foreign Reformed Churches, but thought they had stripped religion too much of its ornaments V Time and frequent communication with her sound- est Divines were required to reconcile her to many of the recent changes, to the abandonment of some venerable and Jong- cherished practices, and to the adoption of others, that might, without due expla- nation, appear to her to be novelties. Naturally, therefore, at the outset, some things, which were loudly condemned by grave Divines, and afterwards generally censured as abuses, did not, to the Queen herself, seem equally obnoxious. The impressions, made in early life, could not be at once effaced. For a while she retained in her private Chapel the s Wordsworth's Eccles. Sonnets, pt. iii. p. 23. h History of the Puritans, vol. i. p. 383. O O AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 21 Crucifix, and Images of the Virgin and St. John 1 . She was also disinclined to substitute Tables for Altars, and Archbishop Parker was engaged in many struggles with her on the subject of the Priest's apparel. In a letter to Peter Martyr, dated 1560, Sandys, then Bishop of Worcester, well describes the progress made towards bringing the Queen nearer to the opinions, entertained by the more determined Re- formers. " Eucharistise doctrina hactenus Dei beneficio non impugnata, nobis salva et incolumis manet, mansu- ramque speramus. Pro viribus enim et ipse, et alii fratres Co-episcopi, illam, quoad vixerimus, Deo juvante, tuebimur. De Imaginibus, jampridem non- nihil erat controversiae. R. Majestas, non alienum esse a Verbo Dei, iramo in commodum Ecclesise fore putabat, si Imago Christi crucifixi, una cum Maria, et Joanne, ut tales, in celebriori Ecclesise loco poneretur, ubi ab omni populo facillime conspiceretur. Quidam ex nobis longe aliter judicabant ; prsesertim cum omnes omnis generis Imagines, in proxima * Images, she had been taught, " were representee of virtue and good example, especially the images of Christ and our Lady. It was meet that they should stand in the Churches, but be none otherwise esteemed." — Articles of Religion, 1536, Strype's Cranmer, vol. i. p. 61. Bishop Parkhurst writes to Bullinger, in 1562, that the Crucifix and Candlesticks in the Queen's Chapel were broken in pieces, but, in the following year, that they were restored, " to the great grief of the godly." — The Zurich Letters, pp. 122, 129. o o 22 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, nostra Visitatione, idque publica authoritate, non solum sublatse, verumetiam combustse erant. — At Deus, in cujus manu corda sunt Regum, pro tempes- tate tranquillitatem dedit, et Ecclesiam Anglicanam ab hujusmodi offendiculis liberavit : tantum manent in Ecclesia nostra vestimenta ilia papistica, Capas in- tellige, quas diu non duraturas speramus k ." — A Proclamation, issued in 1559, " against breaking or defacing of monuments of antiquitie is well wor- thy of notice, and, if Archbishop Parker had, as Strype conjectures, " a great hand in it, (being so great a lover of antiquity, and so sore an enemy against the spoil of the monuments of our forefathers and of the Churches,") the obligations which we owe to him are, indeed, manifold. It first set forth, that ancient monuments of metal and stone, and Churches also, were " spoiled, broken, and ruinated, to the offence of all noble and gentle hearts, to the injury of the public, and of private families, and to the slander of such, as had charge to deface monuments of idolatry, * Burnet's Reform., vol. iii. pt. ii. p. 383. The Queen, in her defence, might have quoted a book, published by her father's authority, under the immediate superintendence of Cranmer. " Therefore, although Images of Christ and his Saints be the works of men's hands only ; yet they be not so prohibited, but that they may be had and set up, both in Churches and in other places, to the intent, that we (in beholding and look- ing upon them as in certain books and signs) may call to remembrance the manifold examples of virtues, which were in the Saints, whom they do represent." A Necessary Doctrine and Erudition for any Christian man, (Oxford, 1825,) p. 299. O AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 23 and false famed Images in Churches and Abbeys." It directed, that no Images, set up for the only re- membrance of individuals to posterity, and not for any religious honour, nor any Image in glass windows 1 should be broken or defaced, upon pain of the wrong doer being committed to the next gaol. Presentments were to be made of such as had ob- tained spoils of these, and they, or their Executors, were to repair the same, under pain of Excommuni- cation, or, if unable to do so, open Penance was en- joined. The removal of bells and lead from Churches and Chapels, which had caused " a slanderous desola- tion of the places of prayer," was also prohibited under pain of Fine and Imprisonment m . The feeling of the reigning Monarch being such as has been described, it is impossible, but that some re- verence and respect would be entertained by that large portion of her subjects, who had abjured the Church of Rome, for Monuments of Antiquity, so long con- sidered sacred, as the Crucifix, Images, and Shrines. The work of spoliation would, in numerous in- stances, be committed to trembling and reluctant 1 It is to be observed, that' in the Injunctions of Edward VI. (1547) where " glass windows" are directed to be destroyed, those are pointed out as obnoxious, which represent " feigned miracles, idolatry, and super- stition." Other windows, therefore, which represented sacred personages or passages of Holy Writ, we may presume, would be spared. m Weever's Funeral Monuments, p. 52. o -o 24 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, hands, which would execute the painful, and sacrile- gious task, with forbearance, if not with aversion : at all events, needless violence in operations, which, to them were little less than profane, would rarely be exhibited n . On this point we have a strong admis- sion in a publication devoted to the interests of the Church of Rome. "It is beyond even a doubt, that the rural population of England were ardently attached to the faith of their Fathers, and that but trifling changes were made in the internal decoration of our Churches, till the ascendancy of the Calvinists and Fanatics under Cromwell ; and even in the present day, many of these ancient and holy edifices may be found tolerably perfect in their original internal ar- rangement °." In the Cathedral of Durham, we are told, that, at the Reformation, " little was destroyed excepting the Shrines/ ' Dean Whittingham, being a rigid Calvinist, " perhaps being sharpened by the hope of plunder,' ' pushed matters further by de- facing Monuments, yet " still in the reign of Charles L n " The rooting out of this Priory [Christ Church, Aldgate, the first that was dissolved] wrought a middle effect in people, for they were neither dumb nor clamorous thereat, but grumbled out their discontent- ment for a time, and then returned to their former temper. However at first they were so abstemious, that, whereas the Priory, Church and Steeple were proffered to whomsoever would take them down, no man would undertake the offer. Whereupon Sir Thomas Audley, the Grantee, was fain to be at more charges than he could make of the materials." Fullers Ch. Hist., b. vi. p. 307. Dublin Review, No. xx. p. 311. o — — o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 25 such was the splendour of Divine Worship in this Cathedral, as to excite in the Puritans extreme indig- nation p." It is admitted by Milner, "that the Church of England was perfectly satisfied, among other things, with the form and disposition of the Cathedrals, which she found ready built to her hands. These venerable edifices, and, more particularly, the position of the Altar, together with the respect due to it, she zealously maintained against the exceptions of the Puritans Notwithstanding King Edward's Letter to Bishop Ridley, L'Estrange considers, that some Altars were left in their former state, about which i( much strife and contention arising in several places, some eager to pull them down, others as earnest to continue them Elizabeth ordered, that ' ' the Steps, which be as yet at this day remaining in any of our Cathedral, Collegiate, or Parish Churches be not stirred nor altered, but be suffered to continue r ." p History of the Cathedral of Durham, published by Soc. Antiq., p. 5. q Dissertation on the Modern Style of Altering Ancient Cathedrals, (1811,) p. 21. Another accomplished Antiquary of the same Communion (long to be regretted as a loss to literature, and still more by those, who enjoyed his friendship), has expressed his gratitude to our Church for enjoining, " that the Chancels shall remain as they have done, in times past." A Letter, addressed by John Gage (Rokewood), Esq., to Francis Cholmeley, Esq., on the alterations proposed in York Minster. (1831.) r Alliance of Divine Offices, third edition, pp. 72, 73. o 6 o o 26 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, Such, then, were the proceedings, which took place at the Reformation. To them, evidently, we cannot with justice attribute the whole extent of mutilation, and the melancholy air of desolation and baldness, observable in too many of our Churches. These were the fruits of a subsequent period s . The Puritans had throughout alleged, that the Reformation was in many respects materially defective : the time had arrived, when power was unhappily placed in their own hands, and they had free scope to hunt and destroy. It was during the Great Rebellion, (temporibus nequissimis,) when men, says South, " used to express their honour to God, and their allegiance to their Prince the same way, demolishing the palaces of the one and the tem- ples of the other in short, when fanaticism lent its fierce and pitiless spirit to the work of spoliation, that its triumph was complete. " Whate'er the Popish hands have built, Our hammers shall undoe ; "We'll break their pipes, and burn their copes, And pull down Churches too. s See Paget's Tales of the Village, (First Series,) chap. vii. The author refers with great satisfaction to these Volumes ; profitable to all ; but to the young invaluable ; conveying to them a body of useful information in a most pleasing shape, and affording them the means of forming a sound judgment upon points of the highest importance. * Sermons, vol. i. p. 252. O O o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 27 " We'll exercise within the groves, And teach beneath a tree, We'll make a pulpit of a cask, And hey then ! up go wee u ." The Ordinances of 1643, 1644, enjoined, that all Altars and tables of stone should be taken down and demolished ; that all Communion-tables should be removed from the East end of every Church and Chancel; that all tapers, candlesticks, and basins, crucifixes, crosses, images, and pictures, organs and their frames or cases, should be taken away and defaced ; and that no rood-lofts, or holy-water fonts, should remain. From these Directions it is obvious how many of these relics of antiquity had survived the Reforma- tion x . Thus, at Winchester we are told, " all crosses, crucifixes, representations of Saints and Angels, copes, &c, were, by virtue of the Ordinance of 1643, carried out of the Cathedral and other Churches. The rail- ings and Altars were also everywhere destroyed, the raised Chancels levelled, and a variety of other de- u Song by Francis Quarles. ChappeH's Coll. of English Airs, 4to. 1840. * Mr. Bloxam confirms this statement: "The Injunctions, issued in the latter part of the 16th century, for the removal of the ancient stone Altars out of our Churches, were but partially carried into operation? — So effectually was the Ordinance of 1643 for their demolition obeyed, that they " are now of very rare occurrence, and I am not aware of any Church in this country, in which the ancient high Altar still remains." Transactions of the Cambridge Camden Society, pt. i. p. 9. Mr. Parker informs me that one still exists in Arundel Church, Sussex. o o 28 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, predations committed, particularly in the Cathedral, which is even said to have been actually turned into a stable for Cromwell's cavalry, during the short time that he remained in Winchester V" At Canterbury, Exeter, Durham, Lichfield, and in other cities, the Cathedrals suffered much. But the Vandalism of this unhappy period has left too many traces, and the history of almost every Church in the land records acts of savage violence, disgraceful to civilized beings. Great, indeed, must have been the madness of the people, when every species of depre- dation and indecency was committed in the courts of the Lord's house, and all this was represented as " doing the work of God." It was no short-lived impulse, which actuated these parties : years were spent in the work of destruc- tion. "What occurred in the French Revolution happened here ; an age of impiety ! Society itself seemed dissolved : for every tie of private affection and of public duty was unloosened. Even nature was strangely violated. From the first opposition to the decorous ceremonies of the national Church by the simple Puritans, the next stage was that of ridicule, and the last of obloquy. They actually baptized horses in Churches at the fonts; and the jest of that day was, that the Reformation was now y Milner's Hist. Winch., vol. i. p. 412. o 6 CROMWELL'S SOLDIERS DEMOLISHING A CHURCH. (Frora a Contemporary Print.) O o o — o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 29 a thorough one in England, since our horses went to Church 2 ." If we turn to Bishop Hall's " Hard Measure," we shall find what a scene of devastation was displayed in his own Cathedral of Norwich. « What clattering of glasses, what beating down of walls, what tearing up of monuments, what wresting out of irons and brass from the windows and graves, what defacing of arms, what demolishing of curious stone work, that had not any representation in the world, but the cost of the founder, and skill of the mason, &c." (p. lxxxviii.) The Journal of William Dowsing, (Parliamentary Visitor for demolishing the superstitious pictures and ornaments of Churches, &c., within the County of Suffolk, in the years 1643, 1644,) presents details, painful, not to the antiquary alone, but to every one, who holds the House of Prayer in reverence. It fur- nishes proofs of the extent, to which the decorations of our Churches had been preserved up to that period, and of the ferocity with which they were then swept away. Take the following as instances of the abundant materials, which Dowsing boastfully enumerates as objects of destruction by himself and his myrmidons. " At Sudbury we brake down ten mighty great angels in glass ; in all eighty. At Allhallows, we brake about twenty superstitious pictures, and took up thirty bra- 1 D'Israeli's " Curiosities of Literature." Second series, vol. iii. p. 335. O O o o 30 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, zen superstitious inscriptions. At Clare, we brake down one thousand pictures superstitious ; I brake down two hundred; three of God the Father, and three of Christ, and the Holy Lamb, and three of the Holy Ghost, like a dove with wings ; and the twelve Apostles were carved in wood on the top of the roof, which we gave orders to take down; and twenty Cherubims to be taken down ; and the sun and moon in the east window, by the King's Arms, to be taken down." On the same day, (January 6, 1643,) Dowsing visited four other Churches, in each of which similar outrages were perpetrated. It is evident, that the powers, granted to the Commissioners, were greatly overstrained, and that all ornaments of Churches were considered by them as " superstitious/ ' In the same Journal, we find orders given for " levelling the chan- cell," and " levelling the steps and considering the spirit, in which those orders would be executed, we can well imagine in what manner, if at all, these acts of sacrilegious violence would be " amended," as was sometimes subsequently enjoined. The soldiery, em- ployed on these occasions, seem to have taken Nebuzar-adan as their example, (2 Kings xxv. 9,) who, after burning and destroying the House of the Lord, took away the vessels of gold and silver, and all the other treasures it contained. " What pity it o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 31 was to see the Holy of Holies now thronged with Pagans, the vails rent, the tables overturned, the Altars broken down, the pillars demolished, and the pavements digged up a ." Well might Bishop Hall, after himself witnessing similar enormities, break forth in his comments on Holy Writ, with this pathetic exclamation ! From this period we must date the whitewashed walls of our Churches. Whitewashing was the easiest mode of erasing whatever was offensive. The practice has unhappily continued to this day. Mr. Bloxam compares these ravages to those of the ancient Danish invaders ; and there can be no ques- tion, as he observes, that the beauty of the Cathedrals and Churches was injured, under colour of the Ordi- nances of 1643, 1644, to an extent hardly credible b . The proceedings at Magdalene College shall be the last of these melancholy notices: " On the 19th of May, 1649, Fairfax, Cromwell, and the other Parlia- mentary Commanders dined in the Hall, by invitation of the President ; and, in return for this undeserved hospitality, the greatest outrages were committed by the soldiers. An attempt was made, by some of the well-disposed members of the Society, to save the most valuable specimens of painted glass by conceal- a Contemplations, (edit. 1626,) vol. viii. p. 321. b Principles of Gothic Architecture, p. 247. O O o o 32 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, ing them ; but this provident caution served only to exasperate these puritanical barbarians ; and though the more recent windows seem to have escaped, the rest were trampled under foot without remorse on the pavement of the Cloister c ." Independently of these acts of sweeping violence, the hand of time would in many buildings produce its customary effects, and, combining with accidental causes, hasten decay. In some cases, when the great tithes were in lay-hands, a miserable stipend only was left for a Vicar with a cathedral-like structure to be supported. Its roof becoming pervious to the rain, and its walls weakened, the whole, or a part of the fabric, would ere long be in ruins. Avarice would next step in, and stone and timber be conveyed away surreptitiously for private uses : wantonness, again, would destroy merely for the sake of mischief. " About every Conventual Church, still used for pub- lic worship, which I have seen (with a single excep- tion), there is an appearance of something between a Cathedral and a Ruin. Damp floors, green walls, and rotting beams, shelter just sufficient for owls and bats, and light, augmented by broken panes, are the connecting links between the high and finished repair of the one, and the total abandonment of the other. Where the praises of God were once chanted by a c Ingram's Memorials of Oxford, vol. ii. p. 21. O O AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 33 splendid choir, a stipendiary, with £40 or £70 per annum, can have little spirit to maintain the dignity of a much better and purer Establishment d ." When, on the Restoration, the deprived Clergy returned to their dilapidated and forlorn Churches, very many of them, not only worn down by years of inquietude and distress, but impoverished by suc- cessive misfortunes, what means had they to restore the defiled temple to the " beauty of holiness/ ' when, perhaps for years, they had been unable to allow their own children the benefits of education e ? Repairs alone, which were urgently required for the safety of the fabric, could then be effected. These in- jured men were not permitted to feel that divine joy, described by Eusebius, of seeing " those places, which tyrannous impiety had laid waste, adorned with far more beauty in their restoration, than their founders before had given them f ." We find, indeed, about this period, a Clergyman bequeathing a sum to be laid out in the most necessary repairs of the Church, that is, " in strengthening and securing such parts, as seem decaying and dangerous s." These works were often entrusted to incompetent men ; the strictest economy d Whitaker's Hist, of Whalley, third edition, p. 557. e Walker's Sufferings of the Clergy, passim. f Hooker's Eccl. Pol., vol. ii. p. 70. s White's Selborne, p. 325. edit. 1813. o— 34 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, -O was needful, and where the ancient roof called for repair, low ceilings of lath and plaster were substi- tuted, and the whole, or a portion, of the original oak roof, with its beams enriched by painting and carving, was concealed. Other gross instances of ignorance and bad taste were committed, which, by maiming the fair proportions, and the general beauties of the build- ing, still offend our eyes. A mass of incongruities was now also introduced. Pews, or enclosed seats, which had been altogether unknown in some Churches, or which in others had been confined to the use of the Lord of the Manor, or other influential Parishioners, or visitors of rank, became general. Weever was amongst the first (1631) who complained of these formidable encroachments on our Churches as " cover- ing many monuments/' the great objects of his notice, and he fails not to remark, that they are " made high and easie for Parishioners to sit or sleepe in : a fashion of no long continuance and worthy of re- formation.' ' After a long interval, Warton, we find, observes, that pews, " according to the modern use and idea, destroy the beauty of our parochial Churches h ," but, from not possessing the information, which has re- cently been gathered on the subject 1 , he expresses b History of Kiddington, p. 12. i History of Pews, published by the Cambridge Camden Society, 1841. AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 35 himself in too sweeping terms, when he states, that "they were not known till long after the Reforma- tion." It would seem, from recent inquiries, that our early writers, in speaking of Pews, meant little more than the rows of benches, of which vestiges still remain in many places k . A few stalls were also placed in Chancels, and these were sometimes actually appro- priated. Fabyan, the well-known chronicler, in his Will, dated 1511, directs, that, if he dies at his " mansion, called Halstedys, my corps be buried atwene my pewe, and the high Awter within the qwere, in the Church of Theydon Garnon 1 ." Fabyan appears to have been a considerable landed proprietor in Essex, perhaps the Lord of the Manor, in which he resided. This direction in his Will points out the prominent place in the Church, which his pewe occupied. Again, Richard Hedworthe, of Whick- ham, in the county of Durham, by his Will, dated 1565, directs his body to be buried in Whickham k From a Survey, made about 1795, it appeared, that in the Church of Leighton, partly rebuilt and restored by George Herbert, the seats and pews both in the nave, the cross aisle, and the Chancel, somewhat resembled " the stalls in Cathedrals, very simple, with little or no orna- ment, nearly alike, and formed of oak. It was evidently the intention of Herbert, that in his Church there should be no distinction between the seats of the rich and those of the poor." Walton's Lives by Zouch 2nd edit. p. 305. 1 Sir H. Nicolas's Test. Vetusta, vol. ii. p. 500. o o 36 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, Church, "nyghe vnto myne owen stall m ." In the parish Church of Whalley, there is stated to be a pew which bears the date of 1534, belonging to the Lord of a Manor ; but, having been materially altered in 1610, what it was in its original state cannot now be ascertained n . The following is the earliest notice of Church seats, that I have met with, and it is worthy of remark, that, even in the thirteenth century, they appear to have been the cause of strife. In a Synod of the diocese of Exeter, held under its Bishop, Peter de Quivil, 1284, the following Regulations were made. " Item audivimus, quod propter sedilia in ecclesia rixantur multoties parochiani, duobus vel pluribus unum sedile vendicantibus ; propter quod grave scandalum in ecclesia generatur, et divinum ssepius impeditur offi- cium ; statuimus, quod nullus de csetero quasi pro- prium sedile in Ecclesia valeat vendicare, nobilibus m Wills and Inventories, published by the Surtees Society, pt. i. p. 272. n When Sir John Towneley, the principal person in the parish, was called to give evidence in an existing dispute, regarding the sittings, he stated, " My man Shuttleworth, of Hacking, made this form, and here will I sit, when I come." He then prescribed where certain families should sit, (if they pleased to make other forms,) and added, " for the residue the use shall be, — first come, first speed, and that will make the proud wives of Whalley rise betimes to come to Church." Whitaker's Hist, of Whalley, third edition, p. 249. Sir John Towneley died in 1539. O O AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 37 personis et ecclesiarum patronis dimtaxat exceptis ; si qui orandi causa primo ecclesiam introierit juxta pro- prise voluntatis arbitrium sibi eligat orandi locum °." The history of pews having been so recently inves- tigated, it would be needless here to pursue it ; but it may be observed, that, more than 300 years after Bishop Quivil's decree, another Prelate was called upon to interfere in a like vexata questio. From a Letter, addressed in 1625, by Bishop Buckeridge, to the Mayor of Rochester, and the Vicar and Churchwardens of the parish of St. Nicholas, in that city, it appears, that his opinion had been asked as to placing certain Knights, and Ladies, and others from the neighbouring parishes, "who, out of devotion to the preaching of the Gospel," resorted to that Church, but who could not claim seats. The Bishop, ° Archaeologia, vol. xii. p. 103. I find that Archdeacon Goddard has referred to this judgment in his Charge, delivered in 1839. His remarks upon it are as follow : — " One would think, antecedently to experience, that there was no place, whence worldly pretensions would be so completely banished as from the House of G-od; and that, at its threshold, the spirit of litigation, and the pride and vanity of life, would, for a time at least, be abandoned: and yet the fact is otherwise. It is a mistake to suppose, that this temper and spirit began to exhibit themselves in Churches, contemporaneously only with pews : for these date only from about the time of the Reformation: whereas, among other instances, as early as the 15th of Edward III., in a Synod, held at Exeter, it was complained of, ' quod propter sedilia in Ecclesia rixantur multoties Parochiani.' Seats within and without pews have equally supplied matter for contentious spirits to work upon." p. 26. See also, Hist. Pews, p. 13. o o 38 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, as we may suppose, was not desirous to adjudicate on a matter of so much delicacy and importance, and tells his Correspondents, that he " coulde have bin content, that yo r selfes amongst yo r selfes, should have disposed therein," but, sad to say, he held it fit, that, when the intruders did come to the Church, " they should have places answerable to their rank and quality." He did not " thinke it fitt, that men and women should be placed in the same seats, neither that women should be allowed to sitt in the Chancell, which was instituted for Clerkes. If you thinke good, you may dispose of such knights in the seats in the quier. And it had bin fitt (for the avoyding all con- tenc'on about higher roomes in such publique as- semblies) that you had reserved two of the prin- cipall and highest pewes, on one side of the Church, where such ladies, and others, that are straungers, might sett. 1 forbeare further to intermeddle, not doubtinge, but that herein you will observe decency and order, accordinge to all mens' states and quality p." Pews naturally produced wainscoting against the walls, which concealed sedilia, niches, and much fine carved work in Chancels, and in other parts of the building. Galleries and lofts, or scaffolds as they were called, were raised by officious Churchwardens, p Archseologia, vol. xii. pp. 103, 104. o o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 39 though frequently needless from the abundant space below ; arches were blocked up, and the long perspec- tives broken. Well might Bishop Montague enquire, " Are the seats and pews built of an uniformitie ; or do they hinder and incumber their neighbours in hearing God's word and performing Divine Ser- vice 1 ?" Fruitful have they been as sources of many an evil thought, word, and work, — of vanity to their possessors, — of envy to those, who coveted them, — and of bitterness and litigation throughout a parish. Isaac Walton tells us, " I knew one with a wife, that nature had made peevish, and her husband's riches had made purse proud ; and must, because she was rich, and for no other virtue, sit in the highest pew in the Church ; which being denied her, she engaged her husband into a contention for it, and at last into a lawsuit with a dogged neighbour, who was as rich as he, and had a wife as peevish and purse proud as the other, and this lawsuit begot higher opposi- tions r ." Often have they precluded the humbler ranks from a due participation in the Services of the Church, and, as such, they have been instrumental in promot- i See the excellent Note on this passage in the recent edition of Bishop Montague's Articles of Inquiry, p. 100. r Lives of English Laymen, by the Rev. W. H. Teale, M.A., p, 162. The graphic paper on pews, in a late Number of the British Critic, is sufficient to make us eschew the very name. May the day come, when the close high square pew will only be known by name ! o o 40 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, ing schism and dissent by driving individuals to Meet- ing-houses, where the " chief places" can be more easily obtained. Before quitting a subject, which now engages much attention, let me remark, that we must cordially unite in the feeling, that in the House of God, as elsewhere, the poor are indeed our brethren, and that we must gladly " be neighboured by the coarse frieze and homely garment, when kneel- ing in His sight, Who taught us to be humble by washing His disciples' feet s ." But, whilst we would most readily assist in clearing away vast, square, parlour-like pews, and high boxes *, (in which even tall persons are so far buried, as to render it difficult for them to join in the prayers, or listen to the ser- mon,) wherever these selfish nuisances are found ; whilst, also, we would render every seat in a Church, as nearly uniform in appearance, as they can be, and would devote to the aged poor the seats nearest to the reading-desk and pulpit ; — still we must require, that » Alms-giving, or the Duties of the Rich, a Visitation Sermon, by the Rev. Folliott Baugh, M.A. (1842.) p. 25. 4 It has been stated that there is a gain of at least 20 per cent, or one fifth, by the use of benches. (See Hist, of Pews, p. 59.) This is an impor- tant consideration, especially for those who contemplate the building or enlarging a Church in a dense population. The lamentable loss of space in Churches, unquestionably arises from the exclusive possession of a large pew, by one, two, or three individuals. AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 41 the residue of the seats, or the largest portion of them, should be duly appropriated amongst those of the Parishioners, who are members of the Church, and who would constantly use them. There must not be, on each succeeding Sunday, a scramble for seats ; nor must the old, the feeble, and the timid, be kept away from the apprehension of a crowd, or other anticipated difficulties. In placing a Congregation, as in the whole Service of the Sanctuary, let the Apostolic in- junction 11 be scrupulously observed. Let peace, and not confusion, prevail "as in all Churches of the SaintsV To return to other obstructions in our Churches. Many of the ugly wooden Altar- screens, erected in the reign of Charles II., were, doubtless, so placed to hide the devastation and violence, which had been committed during the Rebellion upon the beautiful screens of stone. In other instances, rich canopies and shrine work, instead of being renewed, were chipped away to receive Corinthian pillars, pilasters, alcoves, frames for the Command- ments, and carvings of every heterogeneous shape x . Wherever wainscoting is found in Churches, it is most desirable, that it should always be taken down n 1 Cor. xiv. 40. ▼ lb. xiv. 33. x Dallaway's Discourses on Architecture, p. 187, o ■o 42 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, in order to ascertain, whether some stone-work of ornamental character is not concealed behind it. There is little question, but that such would often be dis- covered, and, in that case, good taste would suggest the removal of the wainscoting altogether y. In Here- ford Cathedral, by the recent removal of the Grecian Altar- screen of oak, with its urns and painted drapery, three beautiful Norman arches, on either side, with the triforium, are presented, and a view has been obtained, through a Norman arch of splendid work- manship, into the Lady Chapel. The contrast be- tween the altered state of this part of the Cathedral, and its former barbarisms, is decided, "and wonder is the consequence at the infatuation, which had produced the exchange of sound architectural composition, for v Let us hope, that this will be done in the noble Church of Redcliffe, Bristol, should the efforts for its restoration, which are now making, be even partially carried into effect. A low wainscot runs along the two sides of the Chancel, concealing arches or panels, which should be laid open. The Lady Chapel, east window, and Altar-screen would be dis- closed, if another situation were selected for Hogarth's large picture, and some " rude daubings" below it were removed. On taking down some boards in the south side of the Chancel of Chatham Church, Kent, in 1785, three stalls were discovered of extraordinary richness and beauty, as appears by the Drawings, taken by Schnebbelie. They are engraved, together with some from Tiltey Church, Essex, and Rochester Cathedral, in the third vol. of " Vetusta Monumenta." " Few persons," says the Artist, "saw them, and they were again hid from the eye by being plastered over, which greatly damaged the upper part." In 1788 they were wholly destroyed! O -o o- AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 43 the most paltry and inappropriate incumbrance z ." To the same century, which generally adopted the use of high, enclosed pews, we may trace the relinquishment of many Catholic practices and arrangements, and the corresponding reception of others, totally opposite both in character and effect. An important change was also introduced in the pre- vailing style of Sepulchral Memorials. As persons, less distinguished by rank or fame than those of the earlier ages, were now recorded, in this manner, monuments became not only more numerous, but more common-place in design and execution, and were admitted into parts of a Church, which had been previ- ously held sacred from such intrusion. The more rigid practice of our ancestors is one amongst many others, where we may shew our wisdom by imitating their example. Monuments and tombs were rarely erected by them, but to commemorate the most illustrious of mankind, and they were at once magnificent and appropriate. Were the same rule and practice now observed, these erections would be so much diminished in number, as, in some measure, to lessen the evils, of which we complain. ■ The speaking marbles shew What worthies form the hallow' d mould below ; * Statement by the Dean of Hereford of the condition of Hereford Cathedral, 1842. o o o 44 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, Proud names, who once the reins of empire held, In arms who triumph' d ; or in arts excel? d : Chiefs, grac'd with scars, and prodigal of blood; Stern Patriots, who for sacred freedom stood ; Just men, by whom impartial laws were given ; And Saints, who taught, and led the way to Heaven 3 . The history of Monuments deserves our atten- tion, for "it is a history of religion, and, in the Christian period, a history of the Church b ;" a his- tory also, it may be added, of mankind, of their piety, their superstition, their weakness. Strange it is, that human vanity should be associated so closely with our mortality and nothingness. Without attempt- ing to do imperfectly that, which has been already executed so well by Gough, Stothard, and Bloxam, still more recently, and most ably in the periodical work, which has just been quoted c ; a rapid sketch of the most material changes, which have occurred in the fashion or designs of Sepulchral Monuments in this country, will constitute a fitting portion of these Remarks. a Had not Tickell, when he wrote these lines, the following passage in his memory ? " Hie manus, ob Patriam pugnando vulnera passi, Quique Sacerdotes casti, dum vita manebat, Quique pii Vates, et Phoebo digna locuti, Inventas aut qui vitam excoluere per artes, Quique sui memores alios fecere merendo : Omnibus his nivea cinguntur tempora vitta." — iEneid, vi. 660. b Quarterly Review, vol. lxx. 421. c Ibid. O O o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 45 The earliest form of Monument remaining in our Churches, and amidst the ruins of Religious Houses, is the simple lid of the stone coffin; flat, coped, or ridge- shaped in the centre, placed on the same level with, or a few inches above, the pavement, oftentimes decorated with a cross or some sculptured ornament, and with a few words surrounding the margin. " The very perfection of monumental architecture," it has been beautifully observed, " was attained by the ad- dition of the Cross ; nothing can more eloquently ex- press the quiet, unobtrusive piety of those ancient days, when this was the only ornament on the tomb, when to sleep near the Altar was the highest honour d ." Next we have a representation of the coffin opened, and the effigy of the deceased is given, lying within the coffin ; either the entire body is shewn, or the head only. When effigies were first introduced, they were commonly placed on the ground, as those of the Knights in the Temple Church, but the recumbent statue was afterwards raised upon a tomb e . By d British Critic, vol. xxxiii. p. 71. e At Milan, in the Church cf S. Giovanni we find an equestrian statue of the fourteenth century, in white marble, the size of life. (Archaeol., vol. xviii. p. 191.) This may be regarded as a proof of the superiority at that period of foreign Sculptors, (owing to the difficulty of the attitude represented,) or of our better taste, in not introducing a figure otherwise than in a posture of devotion. The monument of R. L. Cecina at Volterra, (as given in Mrs. Gray's Sepulchres of Ancient I O O o o 46 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, degrees, when the elevated tomb was constructed for an individual of high rank, the monument, surmounted by a gorgeous canopy, attained all the splendour and perfection, which the union of Sculpture and Architec- ture could impart. We have few relics more magnifi- cent or elegant than these Altar- tombs in many of our Cathedrals and Churches, though alas ! they are rarely found unmutilated or unspoiled, either by violence or wantonness, or by injudicious attempts at restoration. These tombs strike the mind of the spectator with a feeling of solemnity and awe. The supplicating attitude of the ecclesiastics and warriors, who sleep below, awaiting their awful summons, associates well with our hope to be " numbered with the saints in glory everlasting;" and as the eye glances on them in the hour of prayer, thoughts are awakened which ought not to be hastily dismissed. The Knight's bones are dust, And his good sword rust ; His soul is with the Saints, I trust f . Etruria, page 492,) might, had our Artists been aware of its existence, have served as the prototype of many of our monuments, with recumbent statues. f Coleridge. Tasso, in describing the dead body of a Knight, as dis- covered on the field of battle, has faithfully drawn the figure of one upon a tomb. The passage is thus rendered by Fairfax : He lay not groveling now, but as a Knight That ever had to heavenly things desire, O O o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 47 Walpole says, that these tombs " admitted no grace, nor required any yet how many of them actually possess it, and that to a high degree ! A judge of purer taste than Walpole, speaking of one of these monuments, dwells with feeling on the solemn repose of the principal figure as in the very act of his last prayer for mercy to the Throne of Grace ; on the delicacy of thought in the group of Angels bearing the soul, and the tender sentiment of concern, vari- ously expressed in the relations, ranged in order round the basement, and carrying the thoughts not only to other ages, but to other states of existence s. Modern sculptors of the highest celebrity may be quoted, as having evinced their admiration of this style of monument, by a successful adoption of it ; amongst them we may number Banks, Westmacott, and Chantrey. On comparing the Altar-tomb, which prevailed so generally in this country, with foreign specimens of a somewhat similar character, we must be struck with the superiority of our own. A monument, of the date 1359, in one of the chapels of the Campo Santo Like him, that upward still sought to aspire, His right hand closed held his weapon bright, His left upon his brest was humbly laid, That men might know, that while he dide he praid. Jerusalem Delivered, Book viii. St. 33. g Flaxman's Lectures, p. 42. 6 o o- -o 48 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, at Pisa, which is described by Mr. Sydney Smirke h , is supported on three brackets, and, however graceful in itself, the figure has too much the appearance of being placed on a shelf. Another monument also of Matteo Visconti, in the Church of St. Eustorgio, at Milan, mounted very high on six pillars, which stand upon the backs of three lions \ is extravagant and unpleasing in design. Brasses form an important class of our monumental antiquities. They were introduced about the com- mencement of the thirteenth century, became general about the close of the following century, and con- tinued until the middle of the seventeenth, although then rapidly falling into disuse k . Affixed as they h Archseologia, vol. xxiii. p. 23. 1 Archaeologia, vol. xviii. p. 191. k A Brass, one of the latest, records the name of Jeremiah Markland. It was placed in Dorking Church by his friend and pupil Mr. Strode, in 1776, who stated, that he preferred brass to marble from its preserving an inscription more legibly. But a very modern specimen, and of a more finished character, may be referred to in the Ante-Chapel of Caius College, Cambridge, over its late Master, Martin Davy, D.D., who died in 1 839. It is described as small, but well executed, and an excellent portrait of the deceased, who is habited in his academic dress. It may be a question how far the revival of Brasses should be re- commended. Much of their interest depends upon their antiquity, and as presenting to us authentic specimens of costume. The dresses of the present day are ill adapted to the purpose, so that unless talent of a high order should be employed in the design, the attempt would disappoint us. Can we hope to rival the exquisite Brass of Prior Nelond, in the Church of the Holy Trinity, at Cowfold, in Sussex? o- o O ■■ o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 49 usually were to the pavement of a Church, they did not interfere with the arrangements of the building, or mar its beauties ; and being also of a simple devo- tional character, the few that remain will always be regarded by Christian antiquaries as memorials of great interest. From the strength of the material itself, which was imbedded in pitch, and riveted into marble or stone, our ancestors naturally considered them as permanent records. " Let fame, that all hunt after in their lives, Live register' d upon our brazen tombs V Here, we have another proof of the uncertainty of all human expectations. No class of monuments has been subjected to greater violence, or treated with more dishonour. The prayer, that implored the charity of the passer-by, instead of obtaining his for- bearance, furnished him with a pretence for destruc- tion ; and the pavements of many Cathedrals and Churches, from which Brasses have been rent, present a spectacle enough to " scald with tears" other cheeks than those of Leland, Camden, and Dugdale m . We are told by the last-named Writer, Where the stone and a drawing or engraving of the lost Brass still exist, an attempt might be made to restore the latter. This is con- templated by my friend the Dean of Chichester, over the grave of an ancestor, one of the Bishops of that See. 1 Love's Labour Lost, Act I. Sc. 1. '« Thomas Warton, Humourous Epistle from Thomas Hearne to the Author of the Companion to the Oxford Guide. O O E o o 50 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, that, in the time of King Edward VI., and at the beginning" of Queen Elizabeth's reign, "under color of pulling down those images, which had been superstitiously worshipped by the people, the beautiful and costly portraitures of brass, fixed on several mar- bles, escaping not sacrilegious hands, were torn away, and for a small matter sold to copper-smiths and tinkers n ." Amongst the Brasses, which remained in 1641 in the Old Cathedral of. St. Paul, there were two re- markable for their superior beauty : — the one of Thomas de Eure, Dean of St. Paul's, 1400, — and that of John Newcourt, " Dean of the Collegiate Church of Aukeland," 1485. Particulars of the mode, in which the figures were prepared, and some other details may be found in a useful Article in the Glossary of Architecture, and in Mr. Hartshorne's instructive " Discourse on Fune- ral Monuments in Northamptonshire." Amongst the most decorated and highly wrought of those, which still exist , it maybe sufficient hereto invite attention n Dugdale's Hist, of St. Paul's, edit. 1818, p. 31. ° Two works, devoted to Brasses, are now in the course of publication, both well deserving our notice, one by the Cambridge Camden Society, and the other by Messrs. Waller. Some of the Prints in the latter Work are of extraordinary beauty. In the " Hints on the Study of Ec- clesiastical Antiquities," some valuable facts and instructions relating to Brasses are contained. 6- o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 51 to Bishop WyvilFs Brass (1375) in Salisbury Cathe- dral : to that of a Priest, in a dress of peculiar rich- ness and beauty, in Wensley Church, Yorkshire (1360) : and to that of Brian Roucliff and his Lady, in Cowthorpe Church, Yorkshire, (1494). Nor must we omit the grand and elaborate Brass of Thomas de la More (1396) in the Abbey Church of St. Alban's, the thirtieth Abbot of that Monastery, and one of its most munificent benefactors. The following minute Directions, given by Fabyan to his Executors, in his will, before referred to, with respect to his Tomb, will convey some insight as to the mode of preparing a memorial of this description. If buried in London, the Testator wills, that, within three years after his decease, his Executors " doo make in the walle, nere unto my grave, a litell tumbe of freestone, upon the which I will be spent liiis. ivd. att the moost, and in the face of this tumbe, I will be made in too plates of laten ii figurys of a man and a woman, with x men children and vi women children P, and over the said figurys I will be made a figure of the Fader of Heven, inclosed in a Sonne ; and from the man figure I will be made a rolle toward the said figure of the Fader, and in hit to be graven © pater tn tdi$, and from the figure of the woman another lyke rolle, whereyn to be P As Fabyan mentions in his will only four sons and two daughters, these numbers, doubtless, include the children which he had lost. 52 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, graven iJlog tecum paScm bcltg : and, at the feete of the said figurys, I will be graven thes ix verses folowingV* &c. &c. Every one, who has carefully examined these monuments, must have been struck with the peculiar force and distinctness of the style of the letter in which the inscriptions are engraved. In the original agree- ments for executing a Tomb, in the Beauchamp Chapel, Warwick, we find the following terms em- ployed. The artist is to " make, forge, and worke in most finest wise, and of the finest Latten, one large plate to be dressed, and to lye on the overmost stone of the tombe under the image, that shall lye on the same tombe ; and two narrow plates to go round about the stone. In the two long plates they shall write in fine manner all such Scripture of declaration, that may be conteined in the plates ; all the champes about the letter to be abated and hatched curiously to set out the letters," all to be gilt with the finest gold r . On the introduction of the Anglo-Italian style, the tomb, with the simple effigy, gave place to piles of marble and stone, as offensive to the eye of taste, as the monument of Sir Cloudesley Shovel in later times, on which Addison so justly animadverts s . A descrip- q Testamenta Vetusta, Nicolas, p. 510. r Britton's Architectural Antiquities, vol. iv. p. 12. s Spectator, No. xxvi. O : O AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 53 tion of their more striking features will sufficiently explain their deformity. It cannot be more accu- rately given than in the words of Mr. Bloxam, from his useful work on the Monumental Architecture and Sculpture of Great Britain. " Altar-tombs with re- cumbent effigies beneath circular arcades, the soffits of which are richly panelled, surmounted by highly- finished entablatures, which are supported at the angles by columns of the different orders ; above these, other arcades and entablatures of smaller dimensions, supported also by columns, often arise ; the whole is finished with obelisks and escutcheons, surrounded with scroll work. These stately memorials are composed of various coloured marbles, fancifully decorated with painting, gilding, and sculpture, and present a combination and infinite variety of arches, columns, tablets, pyramids, obelisks, escutcheons, arabesques, and scroll work V To exemplify the unsightliness of these structures, we may contrast two monuments, closely adjoining each other in the Church of Stratford-upon-Avon ; the one of Sir Hugh Clopton, recently restored in a most skilful manner, and the overcharged and taste- 1 Page 227. " The architectural solecisms, committed in the attempt to preserve the original Gothic features of the Altar-tomb, with the recumbent figure and canopy, in the altered elements of Grecian or Italian art," are admirably described in the Article (Quarterly Review, vol. lxx. p. 437.) cited above. O O o o 54 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, less one to the memory of George Carew, Earl of Totness, who died in 1628. Let us also compare the tomb of Richard Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick, in his own beautiful Chapel at Warwick, with that, in the same Chapel, of Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, quoted by Mr. Bloxam, as " a gorgeous specimen" of the debased style. " The figures on the former tomb," says Flaxman, " are so natural and graceful, the architecture so rich and delicate, that they are not excelled by any sculpture in Italy of the same kind at this time, although Donatello and Ghiberti were living u ." The latter monument, on the con- trary, rather resembles a mountain of confectionary x than a solemn sepulchral memorial In almost all monuments, prior to the Reformation, where the effigy is found, (with occasional ex- ceptions amongst those of warriors,) the attitude is u Lectures, p. 44. 1 This expression is not an extravagant one, as it may at first appear. It was remarked in 1758 that " If the present taste continues, Rysbrach, and other neglected Statuaries, who might have adorned Grecian saloons, though not Grecian desserts, may come into vogue. It is known, that a celebrated confectioner complained, that, after having prepared a middle dish of gods and goddesses, 18 feet high, his Lord would not cause the ceiling of his parlour to be demolished to facilitate their entree." World, No vi.1753. y " The pride of this Minister never appeared so conspicuous, as in the legends and ornaments of his tomb. These funeral honours en- gaged us in some common reflections on the folly of such expedients to perpetuate human grandeur." Hurd's Dialogues, (4th Ed.) vol. i. p. 143. O o o •0 AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 55 that of prayer ; and, even amidst the deformities of a later age, this attitude was for a while retained. For instance, Sir Christopher Hatton's tomb, in Old St. Paul's, and Sir Thomas Gorge's tomb, in Salisbury Cathedral (1610); the latter of which exhibits two figures in prayer, but above them we have all the in- congruities, which then came into fashion, viz., pedi- ments, globes, obelisks, and statues, supported by twisted columns and pilasters. In the Church of Willington, Bedfordshire, Sir William Gostwick, who died in 1615, appears in the same becoming posture, so do also the effigies on the monument of Rowland Berkeley and his wife, in Spetchley Church, Worces- tershire, of the date of 1611 or 1629, and the statue of Accepted Frewen, Archbishop of York, as late as 1664. The change, which first ensued in the posture of the figure, was from prayer to meditation. Lord Bruce, of Kinloss, in the Rolls Chapel (1610), leans his head on his right hand, while his elbow rests upon a cushion. Graphically true to the words of the In- scription, "sic sedebat," is the posture of the fine statue of Lord Bacon, in St. Michael's Church, St. Alban's (1626), who thus sits in contemplation, one hand supporting his head, and the other hang- ing carelessly over the arm of the chair in which he is placed. The statue of Sir Thomas Thornhurst, an o o o- o 56 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, officer killed at the siege of the Isle of Rhee, 1627, in Canterbury Cathedral, is represented as leaning on his right elbow ; in the left hand he holds his shield. The use of the Roman habit had, unquestionably, its influence, in leading to the adoption of attitudes which might be considered classical, and that of devotion would necessarily be discarded. This conceit, so ill adapted to Englishmen and English feelings, was of course accompanied by emblems equally ill-suited to both ; and if an angel or cherub descended, he brought in his hands to the warrior, not the crown, for which the Apostle looked, as his reward for having " fought the good fight," but a wreath of laurel, or an earthly coronet. About the middle of the 17th century, some ex- traordinary designs were introduced. The tomb of Henry Bouchier, Earl of Bath, at Tawstock, Devon, (1654), is almost unequalled in singularity and absurdity. A huge sarcophagus rests on the backs and shoulders of four wolves, or nondescript animals. Equal in deformity is the monument of Waller, in Beaconsfield Churchyard, where an obelisk, sup- ported by four skulls, stands upon a tomb, and the upper part of the obelisk is broken to receive armorial bearings. For military men, it became a fashion to display the ensigns of their profession, and Sir Bevil Granville's monument, in Kilkhamp- 6 — o o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 57 ton Church, Cornwall, is described as being orna- mented " with swords and spears, murdering engines, and instruments " These decorations, most inappli- cable in the House of God, so far from having been discountenanced in a more enlightened age, have been frequently adopted by eminent sculptors of our own time. About the beginning of the last century, the heavy monuments, which had prevailed for a number of years, occasionally yielded to something smaller and lighter, but certainly not more beautiful. Slabs of white marble, with Inscriptions, were placed be- tween small columns or pilasters ; the architrave was surmounted by weeping Cupids, urns, Roman lamps, heraldic devices, and warlike ensigns — seldom, if ever, do we find a religious emblem, or, if we except the skull, an appropriate one 2 . The figure of Lady Mary Newdigate, who died in 1710, and is buried at Harefield, is placed under a splendid tester with curtains, in an easy, lolling attitude, challenging ad- miration for the grace and beauty which she may have possessed. z We are told, that Crewe, Bishop of Durham, erected a monument . to his second wife, in Stene Chapel, in which " a very ghastly, grinning alabaster skull," was introduced. This not pleasing the Bishop, the Artist was requested to convert it into a soothing, instead of a painful, object. After some consideration, he declared, that the only thing, into which he could convert it, was a bunch of grapes ! and which it is believed, yet remains. Quarterly Review, vol. xxxix. p. 398. C o 58 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, "Princes' images on their tombs do not lie, as they were wont, seeming to pray up to heaven : but with their hands under their cheeks — their minds were wholly bent upon the world, the self-same way they seem to turn their faces a ." A class of a distinct character may here be men- tioned, where the bust only of the individual is given, as in the monuments of Dean Nowell, and William Aubrey (in Old St. Paul's), of Shakspeare, Camden, and Speed. These rarely possess any merit as works of art, though valuable, probably, from bearing some resemblance to the deceased. Some- times the bust is placed as if in a cupboard, with the doors thrown open, or looking through a window. The ornaments also are tasteless, but as these memorials occupy, comparatively, little space, their introduction into Churches was attended with less mischief than the huge structures, which we have described. The monuments of Sir H. Saville, and Sir Thomas Bodley, at the east end of the beautiful Chapel of Merton College, may be adduced as specimens of the style of that period, which Dr. Ingram properly terms " semi-barbarous/ ' The former contains, in two square compartments, views a Webster, Duchess of Main. Act IV. Sc. 2. For this appropriate quotation, I am indebted to Mr. Peter Cunningham; see his Hand- Book to Westminster Abbey, Introd. xx. In the same little work will be found many judicious remarks on Monumental Sculpture. AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 59 of Merton and Eton Colleges, as they existed in the time of Queen Elizabeth, and are, on this ac- count, curious and interesting ; but we have to lament, that by the erection of these two monuments in the most sacred part of the building, much heedless injury has been caused, and their removal to the Ante- Chapel will, we trust, hereafter be effected. Descending to later days, we approach that favour- ite ornament, the pyramid, which, for a series of years, was the prevailing characteristic. This appears to have originated with Bernini, and, for this viola- tion of taste and judgment, Flaxman has bestowed upon him a well merited censure. The representa- tion of a building, intended from its immense size, and its solid base, to last thousands of years, indi- cated by a little slab of marble, an inch thick, "to be the back ground of sculpture, belonging to none of the ancient classes, foisted into architecture, with which it has neither connection nor harmony b ," does appear to be the very climax of absurdity, were it not heightened by making the pyramid rest upon four round balls, or, as we have already seen, upon four skulls. As a specimen of the age, let us take the large, expensive, glaring monument, in Worcester Cathedral, erected about 1766, to the memory of Bishop Maddox. Here we have the pyramid, the b Flaxman's Address on the death of Banks. o — o 60 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, tomb, the sarcophagus, and the u^ji, (shewing four distinct modes of sepulture at the same time,) and we have also the mourning widow, with an inverted torch, and the Arms of the See. Another specimen of the same period (1759), shall be given in the words of a county historian. " On the wall is an elegant monument of black, white, and grey marble, the lower part of which re- presents the front of a tomb, on which sits a weeping Cupid, wiping his eyes, with an urn on his right hand, and emblems of mortality on his left. Above this, and supported by a neat cornice, is a white truncated cone, on a back ground of black marble veined with yellow TC ." Colman, in his sportive sally on Johnson's Dictionary, has denned " Higgledy-Piggledy ; Con- glomeration and Confusion.'' Have we not, in these instances, visible and lively illustrations of the term ? To receive the walls of stone, constituting many of these monuments, — for such, from their vast dimen- sions, they may be termed d , — what havoc has been c Collinson's Somersetshire, vol. i. p. 114. d The reader may recollect the monuments of Edward, Earl of Hert- ford, in Salisbury Cathedral, of Villiers, Duke of Buckingham, in Henry the Seventh's Chapel, and of Sir George Manners, and his family, in Bakewell Church: rivalling each other in size and ugliness. It would seem that, according to the higher rank of the party, the mass of marble and masonry became the more overwhelming. Perhaps the ne plus ultra of absurdity may be found in Swinbrook Church, Oxfordshire. The Monuments of the Fettiplace family, erected in the reigns of o- o MONUMENT OF SIR JOHN AND LADY YOUNG BRISTOL CATHEDRAL. o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 61 produced in our Churches by wilful and reckless muti- lations ! sometimes the whole, or the greatest part of a window, full of graceful tracery and painted glass, or a portion of the chancel, filled with fine carved- work, was destroyed or blocked up ; incisions were made into columns ; capitals of the most delicate foliage, decorated panelling, niches, and canopies ; all these fell sacrifices, when they interfered with human vanity. Several of our Churches, once models of beauty and of fair proportion, have been, as it were, hacked to pieces, to give space for a succession of these monuments, many of which, as we have seen, rank amongst the very poorest specimens of art. Of the extent of this evil, even our Cathedrals present but too many instances. The beautiful Lady- Chapel at Wells may be especially noticed. In two cases, monu- ments of surpassing ugliness, and on one of which, the name of the party recorded is barely legible, (a fitting requital,) have actually been obtruded into the windows, the mullions of which have been broken, Elizabeth and James II., consist of two separate series of recessed com- partments, three in number, one above another, wherein the effigies of three of the family are placed, and the same attitude is preserved in the respective sets of figures. The shelves of a library, or the berths in a cabin, might have suggested the design. How slow must have been the progress in art, which, in the course of nearly a century, had not ad- vanced, or rather, which had not caused a scrupulous avoidance of de- fects so strikingly ludicrous ! Q o o o 62 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, and portions of the fine old painted glass have, of course, been removed. Fanaticism itself, in its most ruthless moments, could scarcely exceed the acts, which respectable men perpetrated in our Churches, in the course of the last century, with perfect apathy, nay, with seeming self-complacency. Amongst smaller build- ings, the Temple- Church might once have been cited as an instance. But the better taste of these days has banished all the monuments from the body of the Church into the Triforium, and repaired the injuries, which they had occasioned. " Their re- moval, (according to a Report of the Committee, appointed for restoring that beautiful edifice,) has disclosed the great damage done to the walls, and especially to the pillars, by their fixture. It is not possible to affix them to the wall and pillars, with- out anticipating, that similar damage will occur. They had accumulated to such an extent, as greatly to impair the beautiful effect of the building." The misdeeds of the Iconoclasts did not give birth to a greater outrage, than that, which was committed, under the auspices of the Duchess of Buckingham- shire, and of Pope, as her adviser, so late as the year 1720, in the erection of the monument to Sheffield 6 , e It is somewhat singular, that this Nobleman is said to have obtained permission to remove certain cancelli in the Abbey of Westminster, in o 6 ■ MONUMENT OF SHEFFIELD. DUKE OF BUCKINGHAM. c ■o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 63 Duke of Buckinghamshire, in Henry the Seventh's Chapel. Three statues, with their highly- wrought niches, were destroyed, in order to receive the incon- gruous medley, which is thus described ; " The por- traiture of his Grace, habited like a Roman General ; and at his feet that of the Duchess, weeping. On the top of the basis of the column is seen in relievo, Time bearing away the four deceased children of the Duchess, whose effigies are represented in prohle- bustos, supported by Cupids lamenting f ." The Ro- man General, Time, and Cupids ! Low, indeed, must the piety and the taste of an age have fallen, when anachronisms and mythology were thus obtruded into the holiest of buildings. Here was enough to puzzle the ignorant, and to grieve the judicious. Appropriate symbols are intelligible, but allegory on Sepulchral Memorials is in most cases a sealed lan- guage s. This group might have ornamented a pavilion order to make room for Dryden's tomb, which was erected at his expense. This tomb stands upon the spot, where Nicholas Brigham in 1555 was desirous of placing a monument to the memory of Chaucer, but permis- sion was then refused, the building being more vigilantly protected from injury in the sixteenth, than in the eighteenth century. See Urry's Life of Chaucer. f Pope's Works, Bowles's edition, vol. x. p. 145. g Some valuable observations on this subject will be found in the Quarterly Review, vol. xxvii. p. 324. Ralph, the Architect, censured the tomb of Henry VII. especially for the Artist's " stupidity in laying statues on their backs in such a situation ! 1" Statues of the King and Queen, he observes, " ought to have been in living attitudes, erect 64 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, in her Grace's park, but it is utterly unsuited to its present situation, and at what a costly sacrifice must it have been admitted. To judge from corresponding portions of the Chapel, where we find niches filled with statues, " masses of panelling," and the richest architectural ornaments, all these must have been torn away for the reception of this monument. The statues were of no common order. Flaxman speaks of those, which are left, as " very superior in natural simplicity, and grandeur of character and drapery/' Westminster Abbey h itself, — certainly one of the most beautiful Churches of which England can boast, — has been converted, in appearance, into a Statuary's yard, and any real improvement, in its present con- dition, is confessedly hopeless. An express interdict should be passed against the admission, within its walls, of any more statues. It should serve as a and bold." He considers all faults to have been avoided in the Duke of Buckinghamshire's Monument. After commending all its defects, he concludes, " in a word, I have yet seen no ornament, that has pleased me better, and very few so well !" Critical Review of Public Build- ings &c. by James Ralph, 1736, pp. 63, 64. h In traversing its aisles and looking at the incrusted walls, how for- cible and how true is Goldsmith's irony : "In Westminster Abbey, I am told, I shall see justice done to deceased merit ; none, I am told, are permitted to be buried there, but such, as have adorned, as well as improved mankind. There no intruders, by the influence of friends or fortune, presume to mix their unhallowed ashes with philosophers, heroes, and poets. Nothing but true merit has a place in that awful sanctuary." Works, vol. ii. p. 43. AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 65 beacon to those, who have a control over fine Eccle- siastical edifices. Jealous care and superintendence should be exercised in placing every monument, which may hereafter be erected within their hallowed precincts. "The temporary guardians of these extra- ordinary structures should bear in mind, that every good specimen of the Pointed style of architecture forms an important link in its history, and that the present generation and posterity have a national claim to their preservation V It would have been well, had the vigilance, exercised by Pope Pius V., (or his successor, Gregory XIII.,) been more often evinced, both here and abroad, in regulating the introduction into Churches of tombs, even for the illustrious dead. We are told, that William, Duke of Mantua, in order to honour the remains of Bernardo Tasso, caused his body to be buried in the Church of St. Egidio, at Mantua, " et l'ayant fait placer dans un tombeau d'un tres beau marbre, il y fit graver cette noble et simple inscription : Ossa Bernardi Tassi." Plain and inoffensive as was this monument, with its inscription, it was not exempted from the Order which was issued by the Pope, " de detruire dans les i Wild's Description of Worcester Cathedral, p. 14. 66 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, eglises tous les tombeaux eleves au-dessus de terre ou incrustes dans les murs ; celui du Tasse etant dans le premier cas, son fils Torquato fit transporter ses cendres a FerrareV But not only was great judgment exercised by our ancestors, prior to the reign of Henry the Eighth, in the style and form of their monuments, but likewise in the choice of their situation 1 . Surely attention should always be paid in adapting a monument to the charac- ter of the building, which is to contain it. We ought not to find, in a Cathedral, as we now do, the model of a Grecian temple, a specimen of Attic taste amongst massive Norman pillars and ponderous arches. Care- lessness in these matters has led, in later times, to the intrusion of absurd and fantastic sepulchral memo- rials into several of our noblest Churches, and reflects severely upon those, who ought to have proved themselves more vigilant and more faithful to k Ginguene Histoire Litteraire d'ltalie, vol. v. p. 59. l Mr. Hunter, in his valuable communication on Eleanor of Castile, (Archaeol. xxix. 188,) observes, that "the Chapel of Edward the Confes- sor is one of singular beauty, and designed with great architectural inge- nuity." The shrine of the Confessor occupies the centre. If the Chapel were entered, as was the original intention, from the west end, there would be, on the left hand, the tombs of Edward I., Henry III., and Queen Eleanor; opposite, on the right, the tomb of Queen Philippa, Edward III., Richard II., and his Queen. At the east end is the tomb of Henry V., with its appendages ; "a more august spectacle," he adds, " can hardly be conceived ; so many renowned sovereigns sleeping round the shrine of an older Sovereign, the holiest of their line." CHAPEL ADJOINING LAYCOCK CHURCH. 3 AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 67 their sacred trust. Sculpture is " really inseparable from Architecture ; why should the professors of the two arts be so completely divorced in practice ? They were not disjoined in the good days of Italy, and we have sufficient genius in England to tempt us to wish for their union m ." If we select examples of monuments from periods antecedent to the reign of Henry the Eighth, we seldom find any thing incongruous ; a harmony, propriety, and fitness, are discernible, which put to shame the productions of more modern times. Sculptors worked in subordination to the plans of the Architects, and the most ingenious of the latter dis- played all their talents in the suitable decoration of shrines and tabernacles, applied to Mortuary Chapels or Sacella. The Chapels and tombs were erected en- tirely upon architectural principles n . Where the Altar-tomb is insulated, and brought forward con- spicuously, as those of King John, in Worcester m Quart. Rev., vol. xxvii. p. 324. n Callaway's Discourses on Architecture, p. 61. One prevailing evil is, that the Clergyman is either not consulted at all as to the design, or position, of a monument, intended to be erected in his Church, or not until it be too late. The judgment and good taste of a man of education, which might possibly have influenced a Family, and in some degree guided a Sculptor, are neglected. If due deliberation were employed, ingenuity might be exercised in adapting compartments, and panels, to memorials of this kind, but vanity intervenes, and forbids the submitting a favourite preconceived design to one, who might prove the fittest adviser, 68 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, Cathedral, and of Thomas Beauchamp, Earl of War- wick, in the choir of St. Mary's Church, Warwick, no part of the walls is obscured ; and by the in- troduction of so beautiful and appropriate a feature, the general effect of the building itself is greatly heightened, specially when viewed in perspective. With the introduction of the debased Italian style, taste in Monumental Sculpture, and judgment in the choice of situation, were almost, if not altogether, banished. Let the chantries in Winchester Cathe- dral, the monuments of Edward the Second at Gloucester, and of the Black Prince at Canterbury, the exquisite Percy monument in Beverley Minster, the Kirkham monument in Paignton Church, Devon- shire, and the splendid series of tombs in Tewksbury Church, (a fitting receptacle for them,) be compared with even the best of the degraded specimens — alas ! a most prolific class which were produced throughout nearly two centuries, dating from the middle of the sixteenth p. On each side of the Lady-Chapel, at Engraved in Lysons' Magna Brit. This monument has been shame- fully mutilated. p I am not forgetful of the splendid specimens of genius, which during the latter part of this period were produced by the chisels of Roubiliac, and a few other Artists. To whatever censures the Works of the former may be open, (and I have heard severe ones from a Master in the art,) the mind, which could conceive, and the hand, which could execute, the statue of Newton, and the figures of Bishop Hough and Lady Elizabeth Nightingale, will always by me be regarded with reverence. AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 69 Exeter, for example, we view the exquisite Altar- tombs of Bishops Bronscombe and Stafford, and at the same moment, what have been styled the " fair," but are, in fact, the frightful tombs of Judge Dod- deridge, and his wife, of the reign of James the First. Again, whilst standing in the south aisle of the choir of Winchester Cathedral, the spectator may contrast, at one glance, the Altar-tomb of De Vaux, the chantry of Fox, and the clumsy statue of Sir John Clobery (the friend of General Monk), encum- bered with all kinds of warlike trophies. A long interval elapsed between the erection of the first and last of these monuments ; but what a retrograde movement will be observed in the arts both of design and sculpture ! It has been already urged, that a suitable design for a monument, and next, a proper site for it, as regards the sacred building destined to receive it, claim our best consideration^. Amongst the works of modern times we shall find, that there has been a grievous departure from the better practice of former ages, and that feelings of reverence and humility have been alike forgotten. In the south aisle of Henry the Seventh's Chapel, Horace Wal- i Have not the wishes of the Artist in securing the best light, and the most ample space for the due exhibition of his labours, been too often the primary objects of attention? o 70 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, pole, placed, in 1754, a statue to the memory of his mother. It was executed at Rome by Valory, and was taken from the Livia, or Pudicitia, in the Villa Mattei. Spence, in his Polymetis, (page 55), speaks of the original statue, as that of the Empress Sabina, "dressed and ornamented exactly like the Juno Matrona." Such compliments were not unfrequently paid to the Roman Empresses, on the reverses of their medals, and occasionally in their statues : surely this filial memorial was more fitted for the gallery of Strawberry Hill than for the aisle of a Chapel r . No statue was ever more disadvantageous^ placed than that of Watt, by Chantrey, in the Chapel of St. Paul, in Westminster Abbey. From its colossal size and the limited dimensions of the Chapel, it is almost overpowering, and it is impossible that the spectator can properly mark its beauties, especially the simpli- city and repose of this fine composition. It also forms the strongest contrast to the objects by which it is surrounded, the recumbent and kneeling figures, the tattered banners, and other relics of antiquity. » Walpole's taste in Monuments was not elevated above that of his age, low as that may be placed. While he censures Kent for his monuments of Shakspeare and Sir Isaac Newton, he speaks of " a genteel tomb" in a country Church, " with a Cupid and pretty urn in the Roman style." (Letter to Bentley, 1753, vol. i. p. 305.) C O o- o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 71 Ev'n in an ornament its pla:e remark, Nor in an Hermitage set Dr. Clarke s . But there are graver objections to its admission here. Watt, with his compasses and paper in his hands, is sedulously engaged in giving birth to one of those conceptions, which, in its effects, has added so largely to the resources of the empire, and most justly secured to himself both fame and wealth. This statue, therefore, emblematical of science and genius, by which the com- forts and enjoyments of human life have been greatly increased, was especially fitted for the Exchange, or some other public edifice, in one of our chief com- mercial towns. It should not have been placed in a temple, where one of the most important lessons taught is, " love not the world, nor the things of the world." With regret I allude to another monument from the same chisel ; that to the memory of Northcote, in Exeter Cathedral. " Under the chilling influences of the age, he is merely represented with his pallet ; he gives no sign of his true calling. And the figure, which is sitting, is placed in a position, singularly out of keeping with all that is around it, particularly with the majestic tombs of Bishops Bronscombe and Stafford, (of which we have spoken before), to which it is contiguous. What a strange contradiction it is, s Moral Essays, Ep. iv. 77. O •o o o 72 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, that we, who are perpetually railing at the 'dark ages,' should exhibit ourselves as deficient in those very qualities, which indicate spiritual illumination, reverence, and humility V With these monuments, considered merely in the light of appendages to Churches, I would, as a fa- vourable contrast, remind my readers of the one in Chichester Cathedral, to the memory of Collins, from the hand of Flaxman. The gifted poet reclines with his left arm on a table, seeking consolation from the Volume, where in life he had found it : Sought in one book his troubled mind to rest, And rightly deemed the Book of God the best. I may also allude to another modern monument. In the Church of St. Thomas, at Exeter, there has lately been placed an Altar-tomb, with a recumbent female figure, the hands joined in prayer, perfectly beautiful both in design and execution. It is of a simple and devotional character, heightened by all the grace, which refined art, warmed by the tenderness of a father's love, could breathe into the work. No one, who gazes upon it, can but feel, or wish to feel, the truth of those few, yet consolatory words, which form the touching Inscription — " I believe in the Com- munion of Saints. " Amidst the host of unmeaning * British Magazine, April, 1842. O O o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 73 monuments that every year produces, we may fear- lessly point to this, as to a bright exception, which in elegance, still more in its religious spirit, furnishes an exquisite model for the Artist's imitation, and may induce him to recur more frequently to the purer examples of Ecclesiastical antiquity. It is not the object of these pages to suggest the banishment of sepulchral monuments, altogether, from our Churches, deeply reverencing, as we must, the antiquity of the custom, and the feelings of love and respect for the dead, " as the last work of charity we can perform for them u ," which, in most instances, prompt their erection, and also believing, that they have often been the means of producing a salutary impression upon the living. " The sensations of pious cheerfulness, which attend the celebration of Sunday,'' says Wordsworth, " are profitably chastised by the sight of the graves of kindred and friends, gathered together in that general home, towards which the thoughtful, yet happy, spectators them- selves are journeying." The descendant of a noble house, who, in his family mausoleum, " sees his steel- clad sires and mothers mild," reposing on their marble tombs, and the peasant, who saunters among the mouldering heaps of the forefathers of his hamlet, Lord Coke. O- -O o o 74 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, are alike susceptible of that mournful pleasure, which arises from the contemplation of " these relics of veneration ; " and are alive to the sentiments, so beautifully expressed by Gray, in a stanza, which ought never to have been expunged from his Elegy : — " Hark ! how the sacred calm, that hreathes around, Bids every fierce tumultuous passion cease ; In still small accents whisp'ring from the ground A grateful earnest of eternal peace." A simple stone, to mark the spot, where the loved ashes of our relations and friends repose, and inscribed with their names, a date, and a text of Scripture, is a record of affection, and reverence, and hope : it has received the sanction of ages; finds " an echo in every bosom," and is consonant with all the best feelings of the heart : — who would desire that such tributes should be abandoned ? Tombs of various periods, and of styles characteristic of those periods, (provided they do not offend in point of taste,) collected in, and around, a place of worship, must promote the feeling, which some of them, at least, were intended to excite. The lesson on mor- tality is most striking, when we see the earthly pomps of age after age, in the outward fashion of each separate time, all gathered within the same precinct ; o o o •0 AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 75 the dead, small and great, of all generations, waiting alike the Resurrection. Victorious men of earth, no more Proclaim how wide your empires are ; Though you bind in every shore, And your triumphs reach as far As night or day, Yet you, proud monarchs, must obey, And mingle with forgotten ashes, when Death calls ye to the crowd of common men x . But, it cannot be denied, that commonplace monu- ments and tablets have been, and still continue to be, most needlessly multiplied, and that this excess might be wisely restrained. On the walls of many Churches, instead of contributing to the beauty of the fabric, they are little better than unsightly excres- cences. Not only has every vacant place been seized upon, but portions of the original structure have been, and are, shamefully mutilated to receive them. A long catalogue of enormities might be given, as instances of gross carelessness, and depraved taste. For ex- ample : Mr. Rickman, speaking of the ancient Altar- screen at Beverley, " unrivalled in its description of work," states, " that some remarkably fine and in- tricate tracery has been cut away, to put in some poor modern monumental tablets V The beautiful Altar - * Shirley, — Cupid and Death. Works, vol. vi., p. 355. y On the Styles of Architecture in England, fourth edition, p. 268. O o o o 76 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, screen in the Lady- Chapel of York Minster, and the screens, in various other Cathedrals and Churches, have equally suffered. In the majority of cases, why is not the simple gravestone allowed to suffice ? Perhaps the very in- dividual, whose name is to be engraved on an ex- pensive tomb, was so averse to notoriety, that the distinctive excellence of his character consisted in those retiring qualities, which never sought to travel out of the domestic circle. " It is my will, (Bishop Sanderson directs,) that no costly monument be erected for my memory, but only a fair flat marble stone to be laid over me. — And I do very much desire my will may be carefully ob- served herein, hoping it may become exemplary to some or other : at least, however, testifying at my death — what I have so often earnestly professed in my lifetime — my utter dislike of the vast expenses laid out in funeral solemnities, with very little benefit to any ; which, if bestowed in pious and charitable works, might redound to the public or private benefit of many persons 2 . " Dr. Wells requested "to have no stone set up to his memory," but he did leave a monument in his parish, for he rebuilt the Parsonage at his own cost. Mr. Newman, in his well-timed 7 Extract from Bishop Sanderson's Will. — Walton's Lives. O ! O o -o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 77 republication of a work a by this learned Divine, justly observes, that "it is always a satisfaction to have evidence, that an author is writing under the practical influence of his own principles.' ' Sir Henry Wotton directed his executors to " lay over his grave a marble stone, plain and not costly — considering, that time moulders even marble to dust, for monuments them- selves must die." Of Sir Matthew Hale it is said, that " his tombstone was like himself, decent and plain, with a bare and humble inscription." Again ; how frequently does it happen, that on an expensive marble tablet, all that is mentioned, is no- thing more than what the parish-register could tell us. " Most inscriptions record nothing else of the buried person, but that he was born upon one day, and died upon another ; the whole history of his life being com- prehended in those two circumstances, that are com- mon to all mankind. I could not but look upon these registers of existence, whether of brass or marble, as a kind of satire upon the departed persons ; who had left no other memorial of them, but that they were born, and that they died b ." Collins, in his exquisite lines on the death of Colonel a The Rich Man's Duty to contribute liberally to the building, &c. of Churches. Advertisement. b Spectator, No. 26. O O o o 78 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, Ross, gives to that brave soldier a grave covered with turf, and tells us, that Aerial hands shall build his tomb, "With shadowy trophies crown' d. But men "of meaner mould, Life's common clods c ," are not to be thus easily satisfied. By their own testamentary directions, or by the mistaken kindness of surviving friends, tombs of a costly and substantial character are prepared for numbers, whose claims to sepulchral honours could not well be classed with those of the hero of Fontenoy. The poet's lamentation d applies not to them, for, after a vast expense, and waste of talent and labour, the "polish'd marble," in the shape of a statue or bust, is placed upon its pedestal. It is difficult, in many cases, to connect the me- morial with the person, to whose honour it was raised. Instead of a statue or bust, forming, as it ought to do, the main feature in the design, the space is occupied by allegorical figures, or by emblems, or by both. The hero himself, as Milner justly remarks 6 , is lost in the motley group, and the application of the whole to the distinctive qualities of the dead of either sex, often c Shee's Rhymes on Art. «i " What, though no weeping loves thy ashes grace, Nor polish'd marble emulate thy face." — Pope. e Milner's Hist. Winch., vol. ii. p. 101. o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 79 requires an interpreter. As one instance, let us take Sir Eyre Coote's monument in Westminster Abbey. " The basement is composed of a large square- shaped sarcophagus, within the pediment of which is an elephant, thus introduced to mark the scene of action ; above the sarcophagus, in the central part, is raised a commemorative trophy, consisting of a palm-tree entwined by a branch of laurel, with ensigns behind, and in front, a Roman vest and helmet, inclosing the club of Hercules, with a bow, shield, and quiver of arrows. On the right is the statue of Victory, sus- pending a medallion of the deceased from the palm- tree ; and on the left is a very fine sitting figure of a Mahratta captive, naked, mournfully reposing his brow on his right hand ; his left arm is placed over an inverted cornucopia, the rich contents of which are pouring into a British shieldV In this com- position the captive, which is beautifully executed, is far more prominent than Sir Eyre Coote himself, of whom, in this vast structure, there is only a medalhon. Lady Miller's monument in Bath Abbey Church is another instance of this great fault. Two full-length female figures, the principal features of the monument, first strike the eye, and the spectator would suppose, that it was raised to the memory of f Neale's Westminster Abbey, vol. ii. p, 212. O o 80 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, two sisters, or that daughters or sisters were mourn- ing over the ashes of a deceased relative. These figures, are however, merely allegorical, and the resem- blance of Lady Miller herself is comprised in a small medallion, placed upon the shaft of a column, over which the two figures are reclining. We cannot be sur- prised, that such things are, when ready-made monu- ments, like the tombs among the Egyptians of old, may now be purchased ; of which we are told " a suf- ficient number being always kept ready, the purchase was made ' at the shortest notice/ nothing being re- quisite but the insertion of the deceased's name, and a few statements respecting his family and profession s." A monument ought to be a book, open for the perusal of the multitude. Unless it declare its meaning fully, plainly, and sensibly, the object, for which it was raised, has failed. In walking through St. Paul's and Westminster Abbey, how forcibly are we re- minded, that this self-evident principle has been unheeded 11 . Some monuments are improperly termed Memo- rials : — what names, what acts, what events, do they commemorate ? In many Churches we pass by a long series of tablets, frequently falling from the wall, or covered with dust and dirt, inscribed with 5 Wilkinson's Manners of the Ancient Egyptians, vol. v. p. 392. h Quarterly Review, vol. xxvii. p. 325. AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 81 names of so little importance, — so totally destitute of interest, — that we should naturally ask, why they appeared there, had not "Wisdom answered by antici- pation, "Vanity of vanities, all is vanity." Prior, though he had written " Solomon on the Vanity of the World," yet, by his will, set apart £500 for a monument in Westminster Abbey, or, as he properly terms it, for " the last piece of human vanity." The works and the tomb of " one Prior," as Burnet spoke of him, are, perhaps, in these days, equally neglected, although, amongst the former, there are lines, which well deserve remembrance; still it is by them, and not by the joint performance of Gibbs and Rys- brach*, that Prior has a chance of descending to posterity. Your very fear of death shall make ye try To catch the shade of immortality ; A fancy' d kind of being to retrieve, And in a book, or from a building live. False hope ! vain labour ! let some ages fly : The dome shall moulder, and the volume die k . Whilst the obscure man can never be raised to dis- tinction by his tomb, however sumptuous it may be, or however beautiful his epitaph, for that may be recol- i See p. 90. k Solomon, B. III. vol. ii. p. 67. [edit. 1779.] 82 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, lected, when his name is forgotten 1 ; so those, who have deserved celebrity, need no record of this description. What could be more absurd than to decorate the private Chapel at Blenheim with a mag- nificent monument to the memory of John, Duke of Marlborough ; when every stone of the Palace, and every acre around it, declare his fame ? Si monumentum requiris, circumspice, surely applies in this case. Equally unnecessary was it, that, in the Chapel of Charter House, " the masterpiece of Protestant Eng- lish Charity/ ' according to Fuller, there should have been a profuse expenditure upon an elaborate monu- ment, executed by Nicholas Stone, in honour of Sutton, the Founder 111 . A few years ago, the Abbey Church of Bath con- tained, it is said, at least four hundred and fifty monu- ments, from the colossal figure to the most diminutive slab : " mural tablets, every size, That woe could wish, or vanity devise n ." i Michael Angelo gave to one of the least worthy of the Medici family a splendid tomb, and Ariosto celebrated his memory in some of his most beautiful verses. " Like the Egyptians," adds Roscoe, "who embalm a putrid carcase with the richest odours, the artist and the poet too often lavish their divine incense on the most undeserving of mankind." — Life of Lorenzo de Medici, vol. ii. p. 400. m Stone's statement of the charges for this tomb deserve notice ; they will be found in Knight's London, vol. ii. p. 129. " Crabbe, The Borough, Letter II. NORTH TRANSEPT, BATH ABBEY CHDRCH AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 06 If any one could have the patience to go through them, how small would be the proportion of those, who merit posthumous notice ! From such undis- tinguishing accumulations of sepulchral trifling, taste, and, we may add, both piety and good feeling, revolt. On the other hand, was it necessary to inscribe, on petty and perishable tablets, the names of Melmoth, Anstey, and Malthus ? Genius, like Egypt's monarchs, timely wise, Constructs his own memorial ere he dies ; Leaves his best image in his works enshrin'd, And makes a mausoleum of mankind °. Eustace, when speaking of the Medicean Chapel in the Church of St. Lorenzo at Florence, describes the unfinished state of this mausoleum, which "was in- tended to surpass every sepulchral building in the world." But alas ! before this superb monument, (or, as Henry Matthews terms it in his Diary, " this splendid piece of nonsense,'') was finished, the Medi- cean line failed ! The precious materials remained in store, and the dome, which was to have been in- crusted with mosaics, (at first with lapis lazuli,) pre- sents nothing to the eye but its inanimate form. Eustace indeed conjectures, that, " stripped of its rich decorations, it may be abandoned to oblivion, Shee's Rhymes on Art, p. 155. o o 84 REMARKS ON ENGLISH CHURCHES, until, undermined by time, it shall one day bury under its ruins the remains, which it was commissioned to preserve as a sacred deposit enshrined in pomp and magnificence p." Has it never occurred to individuals, that the me- morials thus raised, and on which so much money and labour have been expended, may, in the course of time, even if they have not decayed, give place to usurpers ? In many of our Churches the effigy of ancient days has been mutilated, and thrown aside to accommodate some modern piece of sculpture, totally unworthy to occupy its place. In the Church of Doncaster the statue of Eleanor, Countess of West- moreland, mentioned by Leland, is no longer to be p Classical Tour, vol. iii. p. 351. Lord Byron's reflections on visiting this Chapel, shall be given in his own words. " I also went to the Medici Chapel : fine frippery in great slabs of various expensive stones ; to commemorate fifty rotten and forgotten carcases. It is unfinished; and will remain so. The Church of Santa Croce contains much illustrious nothing. The tombs of Machiavelli, Michael Angelo, Galileo Galilei, and Alfieri, make it the Westminster Abbey of Italy. I do not admire any of these tombs beyond their contents. That of Alfieri is heavy ; and all of them seem to me overloaded. What is necessary but a bust and name, and perhaps a date? The last for the unchronological, of whom I am one : but all your allegory and eulogy is infernal, and worse than the long wigs of English numskulls upon Roman bodies in the Statuary of the reigns of Charles the Second, William, and Anne." Works, vol. iv. p. 12. Eustace, speaking of Michael Angelo's tomb in this Church, says " it is graced with many figures ; perhaps the name alone would have been its best decoration." Classical Tour, vol. iii. p. 354. o- ■o o AND ON SEPULCHRAL MEMORIALS. 85 found ; and the tomb of the Founders of St. Catharine's Chantry, has made room for some tasteless tablets of their late descendants