V ■ '■> «■ -?■■<> ■-* .|'6 .■■:... -v1 3 b! •• < k .. - • •* v • ,> C-v- T li E • :• y/ ■■. P EXECUTORS, ADMIN iSTBATDR'S, tV: ■ ■ A®. ■■ . 7jms*t*V ? Gl AKDIA3V S (iUIDE. R-feilNCy A COLLECTION OF ALL TM'C A "liiS OF GFOU' fA RLGULATINO THIS i fcjtlTttA'l i • %«&*'*• '/jM J & of Kcpreseiii'iliveo of Estates. > tfOUKTHMl VA Rial's ^>' BEARING ETON Tin: Mjitr'EMkNT OF Ksf| () '• -SUCH 1'OliMS OF iikiiOS, BONOS, OKMFk'T Ai •<•'"■ AS All K NKOFSSA . Y TO THE COO.R'likT :> o:> v ox 8 5 OX o A i) X ov -i V Ov Centpili'd lit a Clerk of the Conrt of | —j— ' OM'ATHUS rklk'TSlJ AT TUX 1 VQOTKTPv OI'FICS, 0 IS '15. •v ' «f ;:< V:."--O-OO--' 'Vi eral items, when and where purchased ; it should their be footed, up and inserted in the return to the Court as one item; to this item the aceount of the administrator, with his receipt, is received as a voucher : pro- vided the account be not so large as to shew neglect in obtaining vouchers. 54. Under the direction of the Court of Ordinary, the administrator may, at hisdis- cretion, manage the estate in such way as shall be by him deemed most advantageous i and upon the application of any person in- terested, suggesting mismanagement, the Court appoints three or more proper per- sons, to inquire into the state and condition of the estate, and report to the next Court* who shall take such order thereon as shall AND GUARDIAN'S GUIDE. 39 be deemed most advantageous to the estate. P. 249. Note.—This is a Statute.under which administrators some- times place themselves in a critical situation. 1st. By deciding to keep the lands of intestates for farming purposes, and working the slaves upon thetn, for the support of the family. It is clear that an executor can pursue this course,!/ so directed by the will, with perfect impunity; be- cause, in that case, it would be either the delivery to the de- visees of a life estate, or some course so closely analogous to this, as would in like mannerodischarge him from liability till the time arrived for him fully to execute his trust. But the liability of the administrator remains, while at the same tinje his business by this arrangement is rendered much more corn- plex and difficult. For it he be a faithful administrator, he should shew a strict account of every receipt and disburse- merit, as well when the estate is managed in this way as in any other. This is frequently rendered impossible, by the admin- istrator's committing the management of the farm to the widow and children ; while at the same time they can only act as his agents, and he is responsible for any waste committed by them. The followingis suggested as the piopercourse which should be followed by every administrator who wishes to manage the property'in this way. He should have an order drafted, which should specify pre- fisely the land, negroes, stock, and plantation tools, intended so to be kept together—this order being passed by the Court, would be his authority for keeping the property together—he should then enter in n book kept for that purpose, every re- ceipt and disbursement, however trifling ; and if he committed the business in any way to the widow, should leave with her blank receipts, correctly drawn, which might be filled out by those from whom she purchased—these repeipts should be drawn in favor of the administrator, and not the widow. He should also be careful to note the positive loss of any negro, horse, cow, or even tool, which was named in his order, and this loss should appear in his next return. 2d. Administrators sometimes purchase land and stock for farming purposes. This the statute gives them bo authority to do, nor does the statute of 1829—see P. 253—for that stat- ute refers only to guardians, and the estates of their wards— hence their only authority for purchasing, is contained in the order passed by the Court. The question is—whether, in the event of objection being'made by any person in interest, this order would be a good defence, there being no law authorizing the Court to pass such an order. 40 executor's, administrator's Promissory Kotes. 55. These come into the hands of the ad- ministrator from the following sources:—1. Such as are found on hand at the death of the intestate. 2. Such as are taken by him- self at the sale of perishable property; 3. Such as he takes for land or negroes sold under an order of Court. 4. Such as are taken by him for money loaned. Notes.—In making their annual returns, administrators sometimes find it difficult to decide, whether or not they should return such notes in their hands as are past due. He should not return the first class, because they are already charged to him in the inventory—the names and dates feeing appended, will inform the Court and those in interest, whether he has returned the full amount, when those notes having been paid, he returns the cash received. He should not return the second class, because the terms of sale, which are written in the caption of the sale bjll,"will shew the maturity of these. And so, also, of the third class. The fourth class he seldom has difficulty with,because he is aware that they have arisen upon a fund with which he stands fully charged, as cash received. Commissions. 56. Administrators are entitled to receive and retain two and a half per cent, on all money received by them—i. e., cash receiv- ed into hand from proceeds of sales or col- lection of debts due intestate. He is not en- titled to this commission on receiving in money which he himself has loaned out; AND GUARDIAN'S GUIDE. 41 but on all sums first coming into hand, he may retain.—P. 224. ' He is also entitled to two and a half per cent, on all sums actually paid out by him, excepting the delivering up the estate to such persons as are entitled to the same, or the retaining to himself any debt due to him from the estate.—Ibid. Me marks. A question sometimes arises on this part of the statute, whether an administrator, in settling with himself, or any other person who may have been appointed guardian for the minor heirs of deceased, can retain the two and a half per cent, as for money paid out, or whether the guardian, in such case, stands in the place of those entitled to re- ceive the estate, as mentioned in the statute. We have known settlements to be made both ways ; but from the following decisions, it would appear that the administrator is en- titled to retain the two and a half per cent, on money thus paid, though not on the value of property delivered. The executor's law allows two and a half per cent, on all sums which he receives, and the like sum of two and a half per cent, on all sums which he shall pay away in credits, debts, legacies, or otherwise; and ten per 42 executor's, administrator's cent, for all sums arising out of moneys let out at interest. " The intention of the act cannot, 1 think,"be misconstrued. The ten per cent, is evidently as a compensation for the trouble of managing the fund, while in the hands of the executor ; and the two and a half for paying away, refers to the final disposition of it, or in other words, to that point of time when the executor's powTer over it ceases."—Tateau et ux vs. John Ball, 1 McCord's' Chan. Rep. 456. This case was decided by the Court of Appeals S. C., in 1826—and the decision has direct Leferepce to the same statute un- der which executors, Ac., retain commission in this State. From this it would appear that the words " delivering up such estate, Ac." in that statute, are only intended to debar the administrator from calculating commissions on the value of the real and personal estate so delivered, while upon all sums paid in actual cash, it matters not to whom, so it be the final disposition of the fund, he is entitled to retain. The administrator is also allowed to re- tain ten per cent, on all interest accruing to the estate in his hands.—Ibid. 57. In cases of extraordinary trouble, the administrator, by an action of debt in the Superior Court, may recover two and a AND guardian'S GUIDE. 43 tialf per cent, more for his services.—P. 225. 58. Where there is more than one admin- istrator on the same estate, commissions are to be divided among them in proportion to their respective services.—P. 225. In case they disagree, the controversy is to be decided by the Court of Ordinary.— P. 239. Note.—The allowance granted by these statutes, is intend- -ed to cover all expenses which may be incurred by the admin- istrator, in the discharge of his duties. The Courts of Ordi- nary in this State, will sometimes grant to the administrator such current expenses as may be incurred by him while trav- -elling^on the business of the estate; but under a strict con- struction of the statute, these and all other expenses should be recovered in the way pointed out—i. e.-by action in the Supe- rior Court. In South Carolina, this statute is made to operate -strictly. See 1 Mc. Chan. '456—1 Desausure's Rep., 160, 542, and a case in 4 Desaus. Rep. 370, where an executor claiming wages for overseeing the farm was refused, his commissions (being considered all that could be allowed. See, also, on this subject, 1 Desaus., 542. It sometimes bappensthat executors and administrators who tbave the management of large estates necessarily and from ■various causes are obliged to ldse more time, and incur more expense, than they could possibly be remunerated for in an action before the Superior Court, as they-cannot recover more Than a certain sum. Vv ould it not be perfectly fair and equi- Table, for such an one by application to the Legislature, and opoo a good shewing, to be at least saved from actual loss, by ■an action of that body. See Laws 1843, .pp. 58, 59. Interest. 59. This is a subject of much importance to the administrator. In this State, there being no statute-upon that subject, but the 44 executor's, administrator's general one against usury, and but very few,, if any reported* decisions, the whole ques- tion, in all its various bearings, is governed by the decisions in England and the United States generally. The following answers, kindly given by an eminent member of the bar of our State, to an enquiry of the au- thor, will be found highly useful to the fidu- ciary, as they cover the whole subject, and are supported by the ablest and most mod- ern decisions, some of which will be found appended. Question.—How do the Courts of Georgia view and treat the matter of interest on an- nual balances in the hands of executors, ad- imnistrators, &c. ? Answer.—1. Interest is not djie, either simple or compound, as a matter of course, On sums in the hands of representatives of es- tales. 2. If interest be made-, then it is due from the representative,be it little or much, sim- pie or compound; the representative can- not be permitted to speculate and retain profits of trust funds. 3. When sums of money accumulate in the hands of representatives, for which it cannot be shown affirmatively that an imme- diate, or prospective demand near at hand ex- ists, interest is to be computed; unless always AND GUARDIAN'S GUIDE'. H appear (which, perhaps, in this country cannot be shown,) that the money could not fee loaned into good bands. 4. That while interest runs generally (by this rule) on sums on hand, yet compound interest is not due as matter of right, ex-" cept when shown to have been made, or when the money has been invested in trade by the representative ; or, perhaps, in cases- of very general negligence and inattention to the proper improvement and increase of the capital and moneys of the estate. 5. When compound interest is shewn to have been made ; when the trust funds have been invested in trade, or otherwise appro- priated to the individual use of the repre- sentative ; and, possibly, in a simple case of mere gross negligence and inattention, inter- est may be compounded against the admin- istratoror executor id settlement with him.* It is laid down by Chancellor Kent, 1 Johnson Chan. 620,that if the representa- live lets the moneys of the estate lie idle, ho- is chargeable with simple interest. This point the author has' found abundantly con- firmed by various decisions. It is the duty of the administrator to make the fund pro- ductive. *1 John-son's Chan. 13, 620—1 McCord's Chan. Rep. 456—a Desausure's Rep. 19-3—it Deaaus. Rep. 233—3 Desaus. 241—- 4 Desaas. Rep. 6-5. 46 executor's, administrator's 'Quere.—Tn cases where administrators are keeping up a farm, would not a shewing that their disbursements were frequent, and at uncertain times, be sufficient to relieve them from interest on their annual bal- ances ? • Administrators are allowed a reasonable time to look out for suitable and safe invest- ments. Six months has been given.* TJn- der this rule, supposing an administrator to have loaned money which has been again paid to him at maturity, arid he is not able immediately to re-invest it, he can only be charged with interest from the time he ae~ tually loans it, provided that be in a reason- able time. This rule applies to no amount in hand during the first twelve months, un- less it be ready mpney (if a large amount,) left by deceased, or such notes and other ob- ligations as may be past due at the death, or during the first year } on such the adminis- trator has to account for the interest. But it is not presumed that any Court would hold him to account for interest on such small collections as are obliged to be made in'fhe settlements of most estates. This obligation to render the fund pro- ductive, not unfrequently causes administra- tors to run great risks in letting it out, that *i MeCord's Chan. 456—2 JVJaddox'a Chan. 134, 135, . AND GUARDIAN'S GUIDE. 47 they may realize the interest. In England, the Courts of Equity make distinction be- tween the investment of the fund on mort- gage, or in the public stocks, and the loan of it upon personal security. If the adminis- trator have invested the money in either of the two first ways, he is not liable in the event of a loss, but if he lend upon bond, promissory note, or other personal security, he is held guilty of a breach of trust, and is personally responsible if the security prove defective. In this State, as we have no stat- ute regulating that question, and personal security is considered as good or better than real, because of the fluctuation of the latter, the Courts only hold the administrator to act prudently. See section 20, p. 18. As to how far an administrator is liable in respect of losses occasioned by not call- ing in money of the intestate already in- vested upon personal securities, i. e. by in- testate, the rule is, that they must let it re- main in that condition no longer than is ah- solutely necessary. The statute of 1764 says, sec. 7th, the administrator shall be obliged to sue; sec. $th, he shall within twelve months after date of letters make the first dividend ; at the end of the second year another, and three months thereafter another; thus it becomes every administra^ 48 executor's, administrator's tor to see to it, that he do not either «xer- cise too much lenity, or make private ar- rangements with the debtors of the estate. His only safe course is to follow the statute. A change of the security, in any way, ren- ders him liable, as to obtain an endorsement on a note left by testator, or to renew; to be discharged from any such private ar- rangement, he is obliged to make the show- ing. See sec. 20, p. 18. AND GUARDIAN'S GUIDE. 10 ^ t3!z!OT ® " 2 c -S £. P < « £ uuhh o r r ® ©,, ft - a 0 * ■> iU tn ; - a "CTQ N> lO (3 :j Cn pen . Z ^ 3 nj 2, • O- B j P . .DiS Sir ■ £.8 s-rt r? <; £ «-i i 5* » ' : 3 3-3! Si -S x Si 979 ft a> o^p o° o fcs 3 m 5 O Bo 2 5 g"-3 c3 3 _ P»P S8*? h> ^ Li 3 ® 2a.g S OD ET *i » ft p!]t og M * 3 00 ft ►*> O ft a* S. I a -! ft Cl. I ft < Cl p S.s* 2 O O) o (C CC -} ? ° tn £_, J* Co s • :. ■ o en en iM-1 Hi B. > ©»?© O *4 W CH •-• 3 o-o © CJi © *0 B CO p 3 •a hj 3 -«< .HJ- 3 » = ^coS^ I ?§' p- •"o W < tc s «c -■"? pj .-. o ft 0-* Sg: e- • § ™ 3: "■i I W ^3 ij --< W >o 13 « Z pj fia w s <1 » 5 .? On £ - S CO?5- g £§• o l» J . .» 3 3 3 ' ► "L s O ~ ? ® S. g : a-3" » 3 °3 <» M • 33 2: g s- o • 2 -t s- «-i O i"n b* 2! in S k—I H S3 &0 executor's, administrator's Separate return of the hire of the negroes, and rent of land belonging to the estate of William Brawn, from 1st January, to 25th December, 1846. John, a man, hired to J. Kitchen, for.-.'. $40 00 Sain, a man, hired to T. Simons, fori 60 00 Teter, a man, hired to L. Roberts, for 80 00 Peggy, a woman, hired to L. Roberts, for 60 (0 One lot of Land rented to J. Dix, for. 75 00 $015 00 CCr3 It is directed that the administrator annually make a separate return of the hire of the negroes, and rent of the land belong- ing to the estate ; this return is seldom made, at least in a separate form ; and when it is so made, it is of the hire and rent of the past year, which is wrong. It should be of the hire and rent of the year in advance of the return^ because the object of this return is to inform the Court that the administra- tor has neglected no part of his duty, but has done every thing in strict accordance with law; which he has not done, if he has neg- lected to hire the negroes, or rent the lands, at the season of the year that such things are done, and which Comes on in this State previous to the return falling due'. Remarks. It will be: observed that the form hero submitted covers one year and eight months, Which to some may seem to be wrongs AND GUARDIAN'S GUIDE. 51 b,ut it will be borne in mind that the law gives to the administrator twelve months in which to. ascertain the indebtedness of the estate j and should he distribute the estate* or part with the assets in any way during the first twelve months,, the law will not pro-- tect him, even against a debt, of which he had no, notice in that, time—{see note on pv 21)—unless, indeed,, it should be that the four first orders of debts had cansumed the estate, which is very unfrecptent. Again : the law directs that returns of account cur- rent shall be annual, and shew a settlement for each year.. It is, therefore, better that the administrator should withhold his fiist return a few months, and commence right, than for him to make his first return in the middle of the year, and continue on in that way, as most do. The difficulty might easi-. ly be obviated, by a return shewing the first settlements,.and a second one bringing up. the accounts to the proper time—and this latter would be the best course^ it. is, bow-- ever, seldom or never adopted. A mistake frequently made by those man> aging estates,and which occasions great de-- lay in making their returns, is, that the ad-- ministrator, before he can make bis return, must pay ©ff every debt which may have- been incurred for that year. This,, in thn 52 EXECUTOR?S, ADMINISTRATOR?S case of guardians, who are not allowed by law to spend the" principal of the estate, is correct; in feuch cases, it is important that the Court should know what the expendi- tures of each year amount to. But, where, as in the transactions of executors and ad- ininistrators, the estate is being settled up, there is no law which compels them to wait beyond the time when their returns are due, because they have, not settled every debt. The statute means what it says, that the re- turns of the administrator or executor shall contain all his transactions for that year ; but. it does not. compel him to make his transactions either more or less than is in his power j and we cannot see howthecase is made any better by withholding the re- turn until the debt can be paid, for in truth, the payment of the debt is the act of the administrator, and strictly, under the stat- ate, should not be returned until the sue- ceeding January. But many will payoff a debt (due in 1842,) in August or September of 1843, and return it to the Court as the transaction of 1842—and in this way the Jaw is doubly violated. Would it not be in more strict accordance with the statute, for the administrator regularly to return as much as he had done, up to the time his re- turn falls due ? -AND GUARDIAN'S GUIDE. 53 It is deemed unnecessary to give the form of return number 2—^-as it, and all future re- turns, differ in no wise from the first, except in one item, which is the balance found due. From the form here submitted, the balance of $318 02J, should be carried to return number 2, as the first item on the credit side; and if interest has been made upon it, that should be calculated and inserted in the return on the same side ; when the balance1 is in favor of the administrator, the same entries are made, vice versa. 61. Amending the record—this is an in- cident to all Courts—and it frequently be- comes necessary.in a Court of Ordinary. It is done on motion, by an order showing the mistake. The order must be specific as to every date and item. This is the only way by which the slightest mistake in a re- turn which has been recorded should ever be corrected; for a return of an administra- tor being made under oath, is analogous to an answer to a bill in equity where accounts are set forth ; and should never after be in any way contradicted by the party making it, but upon good cause shewn. D 54 executor's, administrator's Letters of Dismission. 62. Administrators, who may have com- pleted the administration of the estate com- mitted to them, may petition the Court of Ordinary, whereupon, the Court shall or- der citation to issue, which shall be publish- ed six njonths, at the expiration of which time, if no cause be shown to the contrary, and if it shall appear upon the examination of all the returns of such administrator, that he has faithfully administered his intestate's estate, the Court shall forthwith dismiss and release him front his liability as administra- tor.—P. 240. See Laws 1840, p. 161. In this statute, the administrator, &.c.", having in his hands funds of the estate which are unclaimed, may, by order of the Court of Ordinary, retain the same at four per cent, or deposite it in a solvent bank. 63. Letters of Dismission, fairly and le- gaily obtained, as effectually protect admin- istrators, &c., from all further liability, as a decree of the Court of Chancery could do.— Ibid, and Dudley's Hep. 190. Remarks. These letters, to be a complete protec-1 tion, must be fairly and legally obtained. Every administrator should, therefore, be careful so to keep his accounts with the AND GUARDIAN'^ GUIDE. 55 Court, as to enable him to bear the strictest scrutiny into all his acts and doings ; he should also be careful to follow exactly the directions of the statute in bis application for dismission, < And supposing publication to have been made, his final return ready, or passed by the Court, he should have an or- der passed by the Court for his dismission, in the following form :— Text. Talbot Court of Ord'y, July term, 1S11. Petition, to Dismiss Administrator and Rule Absolute. It appearing to the Court that at the Jan- uary term of this Court last past, John Smith, administrator of William Brown, deceased, petitioned for letters of dismission from his said administration, and that a rule ni si was passed at said term, ordering all per- sons concerned, to be and appear at this term of the Court, to shew cause (if any they have) why said letters should not be grant- ed.; which rule has been published for six months in the Columbus Enquirer, a public gazette of this State. ' And it further ap- pearing to the Court, upon a full and fair examination of the returns of said adminis- trator, as recorded in this office, that he has faithfully administered the estate of said in- testate, and there being no objection made to the contrary— 56, executor's, administrator's It is therefore ordered by the Court, that John Smitji, administrator as aforesaid, be and lie is hereby dismissed and released from his liability as administrator. And it is fur- ther ordered, that the Clerk do issue to him the said letters dismissory in terms of the law. Note.—In case the administrator is not ready to obtain his letters at the term of the Court to which the rule ni si is made returnable, the order should mention that said rule was contin- ued from term to term. , The administrator will notice that,for his letters to be legal, lie must apply to the Court, and not the Clerk, as in case of "getting His letters at first. 64. Administrators may have the receipts taken in final settlement, recorded by the Clerk of the Superior Court: provided, the same be attested by two witnesses, one of whom shall be a Judge of the Superior or Inferior Court, or Justice of the Peace.— And a copy of such receipt (whenever the administrator shall make it appear that the original is lost,) shall be taken as evidence in any of the Courts of law or equity in this State.—P. 255. ISeiiiarks. The administrator should be careful to make no private settlement about any por- tion of the estate with which he has been charged, but all property delivered by him should appear in his final receipt.—-4 De- saus. 60. AND GUARDIAN'S GUIDE. 57 The following should be the form of his final receipt :-r- Text. GEORGIA, Talbot County. Received, December twenty-ninth, A. D. eighteen hundred' and forty-four, of John Smith, administrator of William Brown, de- ceased,.one negro man by the name of Pe- ter, about thirty years of age, and two hun- dred dollars *in cash—the same being the whole of my distributive share of the estate of said William, Brown, deceased. Witness my hand and seal, this the day and date above written. JOHN BROWN, [l. s] Distributee of estate of William Brown. Signed, sealed and delivered in presence of f JOHN PALDING, ( RICHARD BECK, J. P. J NoTE.-^-Where the administrator has delivered a portion of the properly to the distributees, before the final settlement of the estate, and taken their receipts for the same, he should, on final settlement, deliver up those receipts, and have the prop- erty so delivered embraced in the one he takes last. By this means, the record of the receipt would furnish complete evi- dence. Where he has satisfied the distributees with notes, instead of money, and particularly in settling thus with a guar- dian, he should take a receipt for so much cash ; for if he is to be held responsible Ibr the notes, he had better manage them himself. 58 executor's, administrator's Removal of Estates. 65. Administrators who may remove from one county to another, may remove their proceedings to such county, by procuring a certified copy of all their proceedings on such estate, and having the same recorded in the proper office, and giving new bond and security in the county to which-they rc- move.—P. 241. 05^ For settlement with guardians where the minors have removed, and a guardian been appointed in another State, see title Guardians, section 114. Liabilities. 66. An administrator is liable for waste committed by his co-administrator, prov ided he assent to it. And shall be bound to make good the amount, which the other cannot pay. Qucrc.—Will not the Courts construe gross neglect, to be assent ?—4 Desausure's Hep. 65. 1 do. 567. 67. An administrator is clearly liable to pay out of his own estate, all costs which may be incurred by reason of his neglect.— 4 Desaus. 92.- 68. The husband of an executrix or ad- ministratrix, is liable for waste committed AND GUARDIAN'S GUIDE. 50 by her before marriage, only so far as the property he got by her will indemnify it— and he is liable for waste after the marriage, only so far as he actually has leceived the funds.—Ibid. 69. An administrator paying debts out of their legal order, is liable to creditors, as far as he has received assets.—2 Williams on Executors, 720. But not if he pay a debt of an inferior degree before one of a higher order, of which he had no notice.—Ibid, 1280. The debt being a debt of record, is consid- ered sufficient notice.—Ibid, 751. But see note page 21. 70. An administrator may be rendered liable for all monies retained by him, on a debt due to himself, over and above his pro- portionate share.—4 Desaus. 65. And must pay his own debt as soon-as any other, or lose the intei est which may accumulate by delay.—1 Desaus. 515. 71. An administrator becomes personally liable for the whole estate of his intestate, if he in any way mix the property with his own.—1 McCord's Chancery, 477—and on the following grounds : If he compound or release a debt, by taking for it any less than he could have recovered; if he submit to arbitration, and gain less by the award than the amount of the debt; if he pay (without co executor's, administrator's defence) usury, or any void contract; if he delay to bring an action, and so enable the debtor to plead statute of limitations; if he lend out the funds of the estate upon person- al security, and the security prove defective, he is liable at law to make good any loss that may accrue to the estate.—Williams on Executors, 1278—but see sec. 20, p. 18. Note.—As it is not the object of the author to attempt any thing more than to give to the administrator a plain and sim- pie rule, by which he may be guided in the practical duties that devolve upon him ; he has selected from the authorities only such parts of his duties and responsibilities as we are most familiar with in this country. There are many other points upon which it might be well for him to be informed, but as they are rather elementary than practical, their introduction into jhis work would be deemed aside from the original object. For the benefit, however,.of those who may be acting as ad- ministrators with others in the same estate, the- following ad- ditional points may be noticed :— 1. There is a general rule as to the transactions of each one separately, or both joining on the same act. If both sign are- ceipt, bond, or note, both are responsible ; but if the name of either be omitted, lie cannot be held bound, though it be pro- ved he was the co-administrator. For though the law consid- ers them bat one person, yet it does not mean that the act of one shall be the act of all, but r,atber that the act of all together shall be considered as the act of but one person ; all must act.*' 52. There is a general rule as to the delivery of property or assets of any kind. Whenever, by any act of one adminiftra* lor, any part of the estate comes to the hands of his co-adminis- Irator, the former will be answerable for the latter, in the same manner as he would be for a stranger, whom he had entrusted to receive it.t Thus, if by private agreement, after being qualified, one is suffered to take the whele management of the estate, the rest are equally liable with him, because he acts on- ly as their agent; or if one collects money and delivers it te *Except in a sale or release—here the act of one is good against the others. fBut the receipt of assets by one, does not charge the other,. Vr-here no act is done by the latter.-—Williams on Ex'rs, 1292; AND GUARDIAN'S GUIDE. 61 the other, to pay the debts of the estate, and he misapplies it;* or if one permits the other to purchase at the sale of the es- tate, without requiring security ; or if one lends to the other.— ,1 Desaus. '567 ; Williams on Executprs, 1287. 3. An administrator cannot, after being qualified and receiv- ing a portion of the estate, withdraw privately from the admin- istration by delivering over the assets to his co-administrator- In case such assets be misapplied, he will be responsible.— Ibid, 1298. 4. If one of two administrators receive notice of an outstand- ing debt, and conceal it from the other, it will not be consider- ed notice to both, so as to charge the one who had not received it, with waste, if he pay a debt of inferior degree. Though, perhaps, if notice to one be proved, and nothing more appears-, it will be presumed that he communicated it to his co-admin- isfrator.—Ibid, 1293. Administrators de bonis lion. 72. This office differs very slightly from that of the administrator, as he has only to continue or complete what the latter has commenced. The only points in which the laws governing them differ, are the follow- in o-:— 1. The administrator de bonis non makes no return of appraisement and sale, these being generally completed before his ap- pointment. The return of appraisement shoukTbe made by every administrator de bonis non, as without it, there is no correct data from which to shew the Court precise- *This rule is varied, where the administrators live in differ- ent countries, and we would suppose their living in different States would bring them under the same exception,. 62 executor's, administrator's ly the value of the estate he has received into his hands. This return being made under authority, would be unimpeachable by the distributees; but the return of ac- count current (usually the first kind of re- turn made,) is not. 2. Administrators de bonis non, may be made parties to a suit pending, at any time after he has obtained his letters, provided twelve months have expired after the date of the first administrator's letters.—Laws 184-3, p. 121. PART SECOND. Executors. 73. This office differs essentially from that of the administrator, only in this one partic- ular,—that so far as respects the distribution of the estate, the will under which he acts must be his supreme law. In all other re- spects,'they are somewhat analogous. His returns of appraisement, sale, and account current, follow the same rule ; he is allowed the same commissions, and is chargeable with interest in the same way. We shall not, therefore, repeat any of the laws alrea- dy laid down, as the executor will easily un- derstand such as^are written under the title Administratorsj by substituting in every in- stance the word Executor for that of Ad- ministrator. The following are points upon which a difference is made in the laws, to suit ex- ecutors. 74. It is the duty of any person or per- sons appointed executor or executors in a 64 executor's, administrator's will, to bring up said will for probate, to the next regular term of the Court of Ordina- ry, (in the county where the testator 'may have died,) after the death of the/ testator. In case any person so appointed shall fail or refuse to qualify, within one year after the decease of testator, their right to do so shall be considered abated and destroyed, and the Court are prohibited from admitting them to the same.—P. 238. Hut,provided one or more shall have been qualified under the will within twelve months of the decease of the testator, then those who may not previ- ously have qualified, may do so at any time within twelve months after the decease of those who were first qualified.—P. 239. Note.—The question as to what an executor may do before probate, is not settled by our statutes. From the books it ap- pears that for most legal purposes his power is incohate ; he may, however, where the exigencies of the case demand it, and the will, supposing probate to be had, is in accordance with the act. sell, or otherwise dispose of the estate, seize and take into his hands effects of deceased, pay debts or receive payment, and his acts will be confirmed.—Williams on Ex'rs, 172. Whether he has such control of an execution in favor of deceased as would authorize his ordering a levy, does not ap- pear ; but it would seem that in the event of serious appre- bension of loss by delay, he should proceed; as, though he cannot maintain an action, he may advance so far as that step where the production of the probate is necessary—as in ar- resting a debtor, &e. 75. The witnesses to a will may be com- pelled to attend and give evidence on the probate thereof.—P. 238. 76. If any person, having in possession AND GUARDIAN'S GUIDE. 65. the will of a deceased person, shall neglect to produce the same to be proved, upon ap- plication to the Superior Court of the coun- ty where such will ought to be proved, pro- cess as for contempt shall issue, and the per- son shall be fined and imprisoned until the will shall be delivered.—P. 227. 77. -A will may be proven before two Jus- tices of the Inferior Court at any time, but cannot be admitted to record, till a regu- lar term of the Court.—P. 240, ESeiia arlis. The executor is not usually qualified un- til the will is admitted to record ; he should come up to this Court, though he may have previously proven the will. lie should, also, at this term of the Court, come prepared with the names of five reputable freehold-, ers, and have the order pa'ssed by the Court for the appraisement of the estate. 78. If any person shall attest the execu- tjon of a will or codicil, to whom any bene- ficial devise, legacy, interest, gift, or appoint- ment of, or affecting any real or personal estate, except charges on real estate, (for the payment of debts,) such devise, &c., shall be void as respects such devisee ; and lie shall be admitted as a witness. But if such legacy, &c., be given to a subscribing 66 executor's, administator's . witness, (whether charged on real estate or not,) and before he gives his testimony, he " shall have been paid, or have accepted, or released, or shall have refused to accept, such legacy or bequest, upon tender made thereof," he shall be a competent witness; Or if he shall die before such acceptance or refusal, his attestation to the will shall be held valid. And in case of such acceptance of the legacy, he shall retain it, whether the will is established or not ; and in case ot refusal, he shall be forever debarred, and shall not, after having testified, receive the same, or any benefit thereof, or -compensa- tion therefor, on any pretence whatever.— P. 918. 79. Where any creditor, whose debt is charged on the real estate, is a subscribing witness, he shall be allowed to testify, not- withstanding. But the credit of every such witness, under all the circumstances of the case, shall be subject to the consideration of the Court and Jury, as in other cases.—lb. 80. If a testator shall appoint his debtor to be his executor, the debt is not thereby extinguished, unless it be clearly so express- ed in the wilL—P. 223. 81. Executors can have no beneficial in- terest under the will of their testator, (ex- cept it be expressly mentioned,) but theif AND GUARDIANS GUIDE* 6? commissions. They shall hold the residuum or undevised real and personal estate, as a trustee for the distributees or next of kin of the deceased.-—P. 252. 82. If a legacy be given to an executor, in that character, he cannot take it, unless he qualify, and make himself executor.—3 Ye- sey Jun., 148. 4 Desaus. Rep. 215. 83. An executor of a deceased executor,, shall manage the estate of the first testa- tor.-—Schley's Dig. 125, Of Legacies—General and: Specific. 84. All debts must he paid before any le- gacies are satisfied. It is obvious that, as the whole of the personal estate is liable, in the hands of the executor, to the payment of the debts of the testator, the executor must take care to discharge them before he satisfies any description of legacy. But a specific legacy is not liable to abatement for this purpose, until the general legacies are exhausted.—Williams on Ex'rs, 838, 958. 3 Desaus. Rep. 47. 85. If an executor, acting bona fde, and under a conviction that there are sufficient assets for the payment of debts, permits spe- 63 executor's, administrator's cific legatees to retain or possess themselves of the articles bequeathed to them, he will be answerable for the value of those arti- cles, with interest, if there should ultimately be a deficiency of assets, although the defi- ciency should be occasioned by subsequent events, which he had no reason to antici- pate.—Williams on Executors, 958. He is without remedy as against the creditors of such legatee.—1 Desaus. 557. 2 Desaus. 522. 86. Specific legacies arp of two kinds. 1. When a particular chattel is specifically described and separated from all other things of the same kind, as, my grey hbrsa Selim, or, all the stock on my farm in the county of Harris. This description of le- gacy must be satisfied by delivery of the identical thing. 2d. Something of a par-s ticular kind, which the executor may satisfy by delivering any thing of that kind, as a diamond ring, a horse, a bed, &c. It is material that the executor notice this differ- enee, because a specific 'pecuniary legacy of the first class is not subject to the"' general rule of ademption, which rule is applied to specific, but not to general legacies; as, if A bequeath to B $500, out of a particular stock, or fund, or debt, even if nothing of the particular kind mentioned be in exist- AND GUARDIAN'S GUIDE. 69 ence at the testator's death, the legatees will be entitled to satisfaction oat of the general estate, unless it can be shown that the tes- tator himself sold, called in, or in some way changed the nature of the thing bequeathed ; this will adeem the legacy ; but if its nature be changed by act of law, as when a fund is converted into ohe of a different kind by act •of the legislature, or where stock has been transferred into another fund by a trustee, without the knowledge or consent of the tes- tator, or where the stock is merely transfer- red, with the testator's consent, from the name of his trustee into his own.—Williams on Ex'rs, 950. 2 Vernon, 747. 87. Ademption, or a subsequent change •of a specific legacy, will cause all .specific legacies, with the single exception above stated, to fail. Thus, if a testator give his heir a gold chain, and he afterwards con*- vert the chain into a cup ; or he give him a diamond ring, and afterwards convert it into a gold watch ; the heir cannot have either the gold chain, or the diamond ring, out of the estate. The general rule is, that in order to complete the title of a specific'le- gatee to his legacy, the thing bequeathed must, at the testator's death, remain in specie, as described in the will.—Williams on Ex'rs, 946. E 70 executor's, administrator's 88. Specific legacies are considered as separated from the general estate,.. 13 Settlements with Creditors, laws regulating 18,19 Settlements with Debtors, laws regulating 25 INDEX. Page. ADMINISTRATORS, de bonis non 61 Executors. When they may qualify 64 Legacies. General and Specific, laws regulating....... 67 Interest on Legacies, laws regulating 70,71 Miscellaneous Laws 73 Probate of Wills, laws regulating ....64,65,97,98 Wills, Nuncupative, laws regulating 99 Witnesses to Will, who may be 65,97 Guardians. Guardians by Nature 75 " by Statute 76 " by Election of Orphan 77 "■ by Appointment Court of Ordinary 77 " of Lunatics, laws regulating.« 78 •' -bound to make annual returns..., 80 " may hire slaves under order court at discretion 80 " sell real estate or slaves under order of court 81 " may p-urchase or rent land under order court 81 " must bind out-orphans if estate is insufficient.. 81 " must pay militia fine of wards 81 " laws reg'ing settlement with, from other states 81 '' mu3t obtain rule ni si to be dismissed 84 Courts of Ordinary. Bonds of Administrators and Guardians 100 Jurisdiction. '87 Sessions -. 87t Appointment of Clerk........... 88 Duties of Clerk. 89 Fees of Clerk 92. Liabilities of Clerk. 90 , Manjtge,ment of .Estates, by the Court................. 93