Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/cosmicconsciousn01buck COSMIC CONSCIOUSNESS Cosmic Consciousness A Study in the Evolution of the Human Mind Kdited by Dr. Richard Maurice Bucke V erily, verily I say unto thee, except a man be born anew he cannot see the kingdom of God 25104 INNES y SONS 1311 Sansom Street Philadelphia 1905 Edition Copyright, 1901, by Innes ^ Sons All rights reserved 3/?A ^ J, Z. C a ■’■C^ ^ /? ''>■■ iiy ig^-c.. / j =^ NOTICE It will be observed that this volume is printed in three types : in the larger is set up that portion of it which was written by the editor^ together with certain shorter quotations which will be indicated by inverted commas in the usual manner ; extracts from writers having Cosmic Consciousness and from other writers about them will be printed in medium sized type, and it will not be considered necessary to use quotation marks with it, since all matter in this type will be quoted and the writers of it will necessarily be credited each with his own part ; the smaller type will be used for parallel passages and for comment, and with this inverted commas will be used in the ordinary manner. ' <•. C > V, A LIST OF SOME OF THE WORKS QUOTED AND REFERRED TO IN THIS VOLUME Reference numbers in brackets in the text point to book in this list and page, except in the cases of the Bible, where they indicate book, chapter and verse, and “ Shakespeare’s ” Sonnets, when they indicate book and sonnet 2 . 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 . 7 - 8 . 9 - 10 . 11. 12 . 14. 15 - 16. 17 - 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23- 24. 25- 26. 27. Anderson, A. A. Twenty-five Years in a Wagon. Chapman & Hall, London, 1888. Arena, The. Boston, Mass., February, 1893. Atlantic Monthly, October, 1896. Balzac, Honore de. A Memoir of, by K. P. Wormley. Roberts Bros., Boston, 1892. Balzac, Honore de. Introduction to 5. Parsons. Balzac, Honore de. Introduction to 7. Parsons. Balzac, Honore de. Louis Lambert. Roberts Bros., Boston, 1889. Same volume but separate pagination. By George Fred. Seraphita. Roberts Bros., Boston, 1889. Same volume but separate pagination. By George Fred. The Exiles. In same volume with 7. Bible. Compared with the most ancient authorities and revised. Press, Oxford, 1887. Exodus, in 10. Judges, in 10. Matthew, in 10. Mark, in 10. Luke, in 10. John, in 10. Acts, in 10. Romans, in 10. I Corinthians, in 10. II Corinthians, in 10. Galatians, in 10. Ephesians, in 10. Philippians, in, 10. Colossians, in 10. I Thessalonians, in 10. Revelations, in 10. University X 28. Boniiann, Edwiil. The Shakespeare Secret. From the German. By H. Brett Wohlleben, London, 1895. 28a. Bucke, Richard Maurice. Man’s Moral Nature. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, 1879. 29. Burnouf, E. Introduction a I’Histoire du Buddhisme, Indien. Deuziene Edition. Maisonneuve et Cie, Paris, 1852. 30. Burnouf, E. Le Lotus de La Bonne Loi. L’Imprimerie Nationale, Paris, 1852. 30a. Bacon, Roger E. Sa vie ses ouvrages, ses doctrines. Par Emile Charles Hachette, Paris, 1861. 31. Butler, Alban. The Lives of Fathers, Martyrs and Other Principal Saints. D. & J. Sadler, New York, undated. Volume XL 32. Bacon, Francis, The Works of. Popular Edition by Spedding, Ellis and Heath, in two volumes. Hurd & Houghton, New York, 1878, Part I of Vol. II. 33. Part I of Vol. I of 32. 34. Part II (second pagination) of Vol. I of 32. 35. Part II of Vol. II of 32. 36. Baconiana (American), May, 1892. 37. Baconiana (English), November, 1893. 38. Bucke, Richard Maurice. Walt Whitman. David McKay, Philadelphia, 1883. 39. Behmen, Jacob, Works of, in four volumes. To which is prefixed the life of the author, with figures illustrating his principles, left by Rev. William Law. Printed for M. Richardson, London, 1764-1781. 40. The Life of Jacob Behmen, separate pagination, in Vol. I of 39. 41. Aurora, The Dayspring or Dawning of the Day in the East, separate pagination, in Vol. I of 39. 42. The Three Principles of the Divine Essence, separate pagination, in Vol. I of 39. 43. The Threefold Life of Man, separate pagination, in Vol. II of 39. 44. Forty Questions Concerning the Soul, separate pagination, in Vol. II of 39. 45. The Treatise of the Incarnation, separate pagination, in Vol. II of 39. 46. The Clavis, separate pagination, in Vol. II of 39. 47. Mysterium Magnum, separate pagination, in Vol. HI of 39. 48. The Four Tables, separate pagination, in Vol. HI of 39. 49. Signatura Rerum, separate pagination, in Vol. IV of 39. 50. The Way to Christ, separate pagination, in Vol. IV of 39. 51. Bucke, R. M. Shakespeare or Bacon? Canadian Magazine, September, 1897. Ontario Publishing Co., Toronto, Ont. 52. Blake, William. Poetical Works. Edited by William Rossetti. George Bell & Sons, London, 1891. 53. Burroughs, John. Notes on Walt Whitman as Poet and Person, second edition. J. S. Redfield, New York, 1871. 54. Browning, Robert, The Poetical Works of, in seventeen volumes. Smith, Elder & Co., London, 1889-1894, Vol. VI. XI 55 - Cyclopedia of Biography. Edited by F. L. Hawks. D. Appleton & Co., New York, 1856. 56. Carpenter, Edward. From Adam’s Peak to Elephanta. Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1892. 57. Carpenter, Edward. Civilization : Its Cause and Cure. Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1889. 58. Charles, Emile. Roger Bacon. Sa vie ses ouvrages ses doctrines. Hachette, Paris, 1861. 59. Carlyle, Thomas. Heroes, &c. In Complete Works, in twenty volumes. Estes & Lauriat, Boston, 1885, Vol. I. 60. Century Cyclopedia of Names. Edited by Ben. E. Smith. The Century Co., New York, 1894. 60a. Conservator, May, 1894. 61. Carpenter, Edward. Towards Democracy, third edition. T. Fisher Unwin, London, 1892. 62. Carpenter, Edward. In the Labor Prophet, May, 1894. 63. Carpenter, Edward. Private Letter. 64. Carlyle’s Cromwell. Vol. XVII of 59. 65. Comte, Auguste. Catechisme Positiviste. Paris, 1852. 66. Despine, Prosper. Psychologie Naturelle. F. Savy, Paris, 1868. 67. Darwin, Charles. Animals and Plants under Domestication. Orange, Judd & Co., New York, 1868, in two volumes, Vol. II. 68. Dante. The New Life. Translated by Charles Eliot Norton. Houghton, Mifflin & Co., Boston and New York, 1892. 69. Dante. Hell. Same translator, publisher and date. 70. Introduction to 69. 71. Dante. Purgatory. Same translator, publisher and date. 72. Dante. Paradise. Same translator, publisher and date. 73. Davis, T. W. Rhys. Buddhism. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, London, not dated. 74. Donnelly, Ignatius. The Great Cryptogram. R. S. Peale & Co., Chicago and New York. 75. Dixon, William Hepworth. Personal History of Lord Bacon. John Murray, London, 1861. 76. Ellis, Havelock. The Criminal. Walter Scott, London, 1890. 77. Encyclopedia Britannica, ninth edition. Adam and Charles Black, Edinburgh, 1875-1889. 78. Balzac, in Vol. Ill of 77. 79. Boehme, in Vol. Ill of 77. 80. Chronology, in Vol. V of 77. 81. Dante, in Vol. VI of 77. 82. London, in Vol. XIV of 77. XII 82a. Mohammedanism, in Vol. XVI of 77. 83. Neoplatonism, in Vol. XVII of 77. 84. Paul, in Vol. XVIII of 77. 85. Plotinus, in Vol. XIX of 77. 86. Shakespeare, in Vol. XXI of 77. 87. Schopenhauer, in Vol. XXI of 77. 87a. Swedenborg, in Vol. XXII of 77. 87b. Spinoza, in Vol. XXII of 77. 88. Elam, Charles. A Physician’s Problems. Field, Osgood & Co., Boston, 1869. 89. Fiske, John. The Discovery of America, in two volumes. Houghton, Mifflin & Co., Boston, 1892, Vol. II. 90. Fortnightly Review. Leonard Scott Publishing Co., New York, July, 1896. 91. Geiger, Lazarus. Contributions to the History of the Development of the Human Race. Translated by David Asher. Triibner & Co., London, 1880. 92. Galton, Francis. Hereditary Genius. D. Appleton & Co., New York, 1879. 93. Gibbon, Edward. Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, in six volumes. Crosby, Nichols, Lee & Co., i860, Vol. VI. 94. Gilchrist, Alexander. Life of William Blake. Macmillan & Co., London and Cambridge, 1863, in two volumes, Vol. I. 95. Vol. II of 94. 96. Hugo, Victor. William Shakespeare. Hachette et Cie, Paris, 1880. 97. Hartman, Franz. The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme. Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibner & Co., London, 1891. 98. Helps, Arthur. Life of Las Casas. 99. Holmes, Nathaniel. The Authorship of Shakespeare. Hurd & Houghton, New York, 1866. 100. Preface to 97, separate pagination. 10 1. Ireland, W. W. Idiocy and Imbecility. 102. Irving, Washington. Life of Mohammed. Bell & Daldy, London, 1869. 103. In Re Walt Whitman. Edited by his Literary Executors — H. L. Traubel, R. M. Bucke and T. B. Harned. David McKay, Philadelphia, 1893. 104. Finney, Charles G. An Autobiography, Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1892, 105. Jefferies, Richard. The Story of My Heart. Longmans, Green & Co., London, 1883. 106. James, Henry, Jr. French Poets and Novelists. Macmillan & Co., London, 1878. 107. Kennedy, John. Facts and Histories Illustrating the Divine Life. The Religious Tract Society, London, undated. 108. Kidd, Benjamin. Social Evolution. Macmillan & Co., London, 1894. 109. Lillie, Arthur. The Influence of Buddhism on Primitive Christianity. Swan Sonnenschien & Co., London, 1893. no. Preface to 109, separate pagination. iioa. Lloyd, J. William. Dawn Thought. Mangus Press, Wellesley Hills, Mass., 1900. XIII 111. Longfellow, H. W. Translation of Divine Comedy by Dante Alighieri. George Rutledge & Sons, London, 1867. — The Inferno. 112. Lewis, David. Life of St. John of the Cross, prefixed to 202 infra. 1 1 2a. Lelut, F. L’Amulette de Pascal. Bailliere, Paris, 1846. 1 1 3. Lyell, Sir Charles. The Geological Evidences of the Antiquity of Man. John Murray, London, 1863. 1 14. Lecky, W. E. H. History of European Morals. Longmans, Green & Co., London, 1869, Vol. II. 1 1 5. Mueller, F. Max. Lectures on the Science of Language, eighth edition, in two volumes. Longmans, Green & Co., London, 1875, Vol. I. 1 16. Mueller, F. Max. The Science of Thought. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1887, in two volumes, Vol. II. 1 17. Vol. I of 1 16. 1 19. Magee, Thomas. In California, May, 1893. 120. Macaulay, T. B. Critical Historical and Literary Essays, in six volumes. Hurd & Houghton, New York, 1875, Vol. HI. 121. Medical Record, New York, May ii, 1895. 122. Medical Record, New York, June 8, 1895. . , 123. Martensen, Hans Lassen. Jacob Behmen : His Life and Teaching ; or. Studies in Theosophy. Translated from the Danish by T. Rhys Evans. Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1885. 124. Morgan, Lewis H. Ancient Society; or. Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. Henry Holt 8 f. Co., New York, 1877. 124a. Notes and Fragments. Edited by Dr. R. M. Bucke, 1899. 125. Nineteenth Century, The. New York, August, 1896. 126. Pictet, Adolphe. Les Origines Indo-Europeennes. Sandoy et Fritchbacher, Paris, 1877, in three volumes, Vol. H. : 127. Plato. Jowett’s Translation. Clarendon Press. Oxford, 1875, five volumes, Vol. II. 128. Prescott, William Hickling. Conquest of Mexico. Routledge, Warne & Rout- ledge, 1863, in two volumes, Vol. I. , 128a. Peck, Harry Thurston. The Cosmopolitan, July, 1899. 129. Pott, Mrs. Henry. The Promus. By Francis Bacon. Longmans, Green & Co., London, 1883. 130. Pott, Mrs. Henry. Did Francis Bacon Write “Shakespeare?” Robert Banks & Son, London, 1893. 131. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, January, 1894. Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibner & Co., London. 132. Pink, Caleb. The Angel of the Mental Orient. William Reeves, London, 1895. 133. Pollock, Sir Frederick. Spinoza’s Life and Philosophy. Duckworth & Co., London, 1899. XIV 133 ^- PHelps, Elizabeth Stuart. The Story of Jesus Christ. Houghton, Mifflin & Co., Boston, 1897. 134. Romanes, George John. Mental Evolution in Man, Origin of Human Faculty. D. Appleton & Co., New York, 1889. 135. Reference Hand Book of the Medical Sciences. Edited by Albert H. Buck, in eight volumes. William Wood & Co., New York, 1885—1889, Vol. II. 136. Renan, Ernest. Etudes d’Histoire Religieuse. Calmann Levy, Paris, 1880. 137. Renan, Ernest. Histoire du Peuple d’lsrael, in five volumes. Calmann Levy, Paris, 1889-1894, Vol I. 138. Vol. II of 137. 139. Rossetti, W. M. Prefatory Memoir of William Blake, in 46 supra. 140. R P. S. Walk in the Light. 14 1. Rawley, William D. D. Life of Bacon, in 29. 142. Renan, Ernest. Les Apotres. Michel, Levy Freres, Paris, 1866. 143. Renan, Ernest. Saint Paul. Michel, Levy Freres, Paris, 1869. 144. Ramsay, W. M. St. Paul the Traveler and the Roman Citizen. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, 1896. 145. Ruggles, H. J. The Plays of Shakespeare Founded on Literary Form. Hough- ton, Mifflin & Co., Boston, 1895. 146. Sacred Books of the East. Edited by F. Max Mueller. The Clarendon Press, Oxford, in forty-eight volumes, 1879—1885. 147. Introduction to Vol. I of 146, separate pagination. 148. Khandogya, Upanishad. Translated by F. Max Mueller, in Vol. I of 146. 149. Talavakara, Upanishad. Translated by F. Max Mueller, in Vol. I of 146. 150. Vagasaneyi, Samhita Upanishad, Translated by F. Max Mueller, in Vol. I of 146. I 5 I. Part I of Qur’an. Translated from the Arabic by E. H. Palmer, being Vol. VI of 146. 152. Introduction to Qur’an. By E. H. Palmer, separate pagination, in Vol. VI of 146. 153. Part II of Qur’an. Translated from the Arabic by E. H. Palmer, being Vol. IX of 146. 154. Bhagavadgita. Translated by K. T. Telang, in Vol. VIII of 146. 155. Anugita. Translated by K. T. Telang, in Vol. VHI of 146. 156. Dhammapada. Translated by F. Max Mueller, in Vol. X of 146. 157. Sutta-Nipata. Translated from Pali by V. Fausboll, in Vol. X of 146. 158. Introduction to 157. By V. P'ausboll, in Vol. X of 146, separate pagination. 159. Dhamma-kakka-Ppavattana-Sutta. Translated from Pali by T. W. Rhys Davids, in Vol. XI of 146. 160. Introduction to 159. By T. W. Rhys Davids, in Vol. XI of 146. 161. Akankheyya-Sutta. Translated from Pali by T. W. Rhys Davids, in Vol. XI of 146. Introduction to 161. By T. W. Rhys Davids, in Vol. XI of 146. 162. XV 163. Maha Parinibbana-Sutta. Translalated from Pali by T. Rhys Davids, in Vol. XI of 146. 164. Saddaharina-Pundarika ; or, the Lotus of the True Law. Translated by H. Kern, in Vol. XXI of 146. 165. Introduction to 164. By H. Kern, in Vol. XXI of 146. 166. The Texts of Taoism. Translated by James Legge. Vol. XXXIX of 146. 167. Sharpe, William. Introduction to the Songs, Poems and Sonnets of William Shakespeare. Walter Scott, London, 1885. 168. Scott, Walter. Edited by Andrew Lang, in forty-eight volumes. Estes & Lau- riat, Boston, 1894. Vol. II of Waverley. 169. Introduction to Vol. XXXVIII of 168. 170. Stead, William Thomas. In Review of Reviews, number not noted, but imme- diately after Tennyson’s death, which took place October 6, 1892. 170a. Spinoza. Ethic. Translated from the Latin by A. H. Stirling, second edition. Macmillan & Co., New York, 1894. 17 1. Sutherland, Jabez Thomas. The Bible: Its Origin, Growth and Character. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, 1893. 172. Salt, H. S. Richard Jefferies: A Study. Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1894. 173. Sharpe, William. The Dual Image. H. A. Copley, London, 1896. 174. Spedding, James. Life and Times of Francis Bacon, in two volumes. Hough- ton, Osgood & Co., Boston, 1878, Vol. I. 175. Vol. II of 174. 176. Shakespeare’s Sonnets and a Lover’s Complaint. Reprinted in the Orthography and Punctuation of the original edition of 1609. John Russell Smith, Lon- don, 1870. 177. Spedding, James. Evenings with a Reviewer, in two volumes. Houghton, Mifflin & Co., 1882, Vol. I. 178. Vol. II of 177. 179. Symonds, J. A. The Study of Dante. Adam & Charles Black, Edinburgh, 1890. 180. Tyndall, John. Heat Considered as a Mode of Motion. D. Appleton & Co., New York, 1863. 181. Tyndall, John. Fragments of Science. D. Appleton & Co., New York, 1871. 182. Tennyson, Lord Alfred. A Memoir by His Son, in two volumes. Macmillan & Co., London, 1897, Vol. I. 182a. Vol. II of 182. 183. Tennyson, Lord Alfred. Works in ten volumes. Henry T. Thomas, New York, 1893. 184. Vol. HI of 183. 185. Vol. IV of 183. 186. Vol. VIII of 183. XVI 1 8/. Tyner, Paul. The Living Christ. Temple Publishing Co., Denver, Col., 1897. 188. Vaughan, Robert Alfred. Hours With the Mystics, sixth edition, in two vol- umes. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1893, Vol. I. 189. Vol. II of 188. 190. Ward, Lester F. Dynamic Sociology; or. Applied Social Science, in two vol- umes. D. Appleton & Co., New York, 1883, Vol. I. 191. Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Brooklyn, N. Y., 1855. 192. Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass, author’s edition. Camden, N. J., 1876. 193. Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. David McKay, Philadelphia, 1891-1892. 194. Whitman, Walt. Complete Prose Works. David McKay, Philadelphia, 1892. 195. Democratic Vistas, in 194. 196. Pieces in Early Youth, in 194. 197. Wigston, W. F. C. Francis Bacon, Poet, Prophet and Philosopher versus Phan- tom Captain Shakespeare. Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibner & Co., London, 1891. 198. Wordsworth, William. Poetical Works, seven volumes in three. Hurd & Houghton, Boston, 1877, Vol. II. 199. White, Alexander. Jacob Behmen : An Appreciation. Oliphant, Anderson & Ferrier, Edinburgh and London, 1894. 199a. Walden. By Henry D. Thoreau. Houghton, Osgood & Co., Boston, 1880. 200. Ward, Lester F. Relation of Sociology to Anthropology. The American An- thropologist, July, 1895. 201. Xenophon. The Anabasis and Memorabilia of Socrates. Translated from the Greek by J. S. Watson. Harper & Bros., New York, 1864. 202. Yepes, John, called St. John of the Cross. Life and Works, in two volumes, the former by, and the latter translated from the Spanish by, David Lewis (112 supra). Thomas Baker, London, 1889—1891. 203. Ascent of Mount Carmel, in Vol. I of 202. 204. The Dark Night of the Soul, in Vol. II of 202. 205. A Spiritual Canticle of the Soul and the Bridegroom Christ, in Vol. II of 202. 206. The Living Flame of Love, in Vol. II of 202. 207. Spiritual Maxims, in Vol. II of 202. 208. Poems, in Vol. II of 202. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Dedication v Notice vii List of Books Quoted ix Table of Contents xvii First Words PART I. I PART II. Evolution and Devolution. CHAPTER 1. To Self Consciousness 2. On the Plane of Self Consciousness 3. Devolution 17 19 45 PART III. From Self to Cosmic Consciousness 51 10 11 12 13 14 PART IV. Distances of Cosmic Consciousness. Gautama the Buddha Jesus the Christ Paul Plotinus Mohammed Dante Las Casas John Yepes ^^_^JFrancis^^B^^ . . • Jacob Behmen William Blake Honore de Balzac Walt Whitman Edward Carpenter • . 69 81 93 lOI 104 108 “S 118 130 149 159 165 XVIIl PART V. Additional — Some of Them Lesser, Imperfect, and Doubtful Instances. CHAITER PAGE 1. The Twilight 212 2. Moses 212 3. Gideon 214 4. Isaiah 215 5 - Li R 215 6. Socrates 221 7. Roger Bacon 222 8. Pascal 225 9. Benedict Spinoza 228 10. James ^ARDiNER^r* 233 11. Swedenborg 235 12. William Wordsworth 236 13. Charles G. Finney 237 14. Alexander Pushkin 239 15. Emerson 240 16. Tennyson 241 17- J. B. B 243 18. H. D. Thoreau 244 19. J. B 246 20. C. P 247 21. H. B 251 22. R. P. S 255 23- E. T 257 24. Ramakrisana Paramahansa 257 25- J. H. J 261 26. T. S. R ... 262 27. W. H. W 2 ^ 28. Richard Jefferies . 264 29. C. M. C 267 30. M. C. L 273 31. J. W. W 275 32. J. William Lloyd 284 33. Horace Traubel 286 34. Paul Tyner 291 35- C. Y. E 297 36. A. J. S 300 PART VI. Last Words . . 303 PART I. FIRST WORDS. I. What is Cosmic Consciousness? The present volume is an attempt to answer this question ; but notwithstanding it seems well to make a short pref- atory statement in as plain language as possible so as to open the door, as it were, for the more elaborate exposition to be attempted in the body of the work. Cosmic Conciousness, then, is a higher form of consciousness than that possessed by the ordinary man. This last is called Self Consciousness and is that faculty upon which rests all of our life (both subjective and objec- tive) which is not common to us and the higher animals, except that small part of it which is derived from the few individuals who have had the higher consciousness above named. To make the matter clear it must be under- stood that there are three forms or grades of consciousness, (i) Simple Consciousness, which is possessed by say the upper half of the animal king- dom. By means of this faculty a dog or a horse is just as conscious of the things about him as a man is ; he is also conscious of his own limbs and body and he knows that these are a part of himself. (2) Over and above this Simple Consciousness, which is possessed by man as by animals, man has another which is called Self Consciousness. By virtue of this faculty man is not only conscious of trees, rocks, waters, his own limbs and body, but he becomes conscious of himself as a distinct entity apart from all the rest of the universe. It is as good as certain that no animal can realize him- self in that way. Further, by means of self consciousness, man (who knows as the animal knows) becomes capable of treating his own mental states as objects of consciousness. The animal is, as it were, immersed in his con- sciousness as a fish in the sea; he cannot, even in imagination, get outside of it for one moment so as to realize it. But man by virtue of self conscious- ness can step aside, as it were, from himself and think : “Yes, that thought that I had about that matter is true ; I know it is true and I know that I know it is true.” The writer has been asked : “How do you know that ani- mals cannot think in the same manner?” The answer is simple and conclu- sive — it is : There is no evidence that any animal can so think, but if they could we should soon know it. Between two creatures living together, as dogs or horses and men, and each self conscious, it would be the simplest 2 Cosmic Consciousness matter in the world to open up communication. Even as it is, diverse as is our psychology, we do, by watching his acts, enter into the dog’s mind pretty freely — we see what is going on there — we know that the dog sees and hears, smells and tastes — we know that he has intelligence — adapts means to ends — that he reasons. If he was self conscious we must have learned it long ago. We have not learned it and it is as good as certain that no dog, horse, elephant or ape ever was self conscious. Another thing : on man’s self con- sciousness is built everything in and about us distinctively human. Lan guage is the objective of which self consciousness is the subjective. Self con sciousness and language (two in one, for they are two halves of the same thing) are the sine qua non of human social life, of manners, of institutions, of industries of all kinds, of all arts useful and fine. If any animal pos- sessed self consciousness it seems certain that it would upon that master fac- ulty build (as man has done) a superstructure of language; of reasoned out customs, industries, art. But no animal has done this, therefore we infer that no animal has self consciousness. The possession of self consciousness and language (its other self) by man creates an enormous gap between him and the highest creature possessing simple consciousness merely. Cosmic Consciousness is a third form which is as far above Self Con- sciousness as is that above Simple Consciousness. With this form, of course, both simple and self consciousness persist (as simple cosciousness persists when self consciousness is acquired), but added to them is the new faculty so often named and to be named in this volume. The prime characteristic of cosmic consciousness is, as its name implies, a consciousness of the cos- mos, that is, of the life and order of the universe. What these words mean cannot be touched upon here ; it is the business of this volume to throw some light upon them. There are many elements belonging to the cosmic sense besides the central fact just alluded to. Of these a few may be men- tioned. Along with the consciousness of the cosmos there occurs an intel- lectual enlightenment or illumination which alone would place the individual on a new plane of existence — would make him almost a member of a new species. To this is added a state of moral exaltation, an indescribable feel- ing of elevation, elation, and joyousness, and a quickening of the moral sense, which is fully as striking and more important both to the individual and to the race than is the enhanced intellectual power. With these come, what may be called, a sense of immortality, a consciousness of eternal life, not a conviction that he shall have this, but the consciousness that he has it already. Only a personal experience of it, or a prolonged study of men who have First Words 3 passed into the new life, will enable us to realize what this actually is ; but it has seemed to the present writer that to pass in review, even briefly and imperfectly, instances in which the condition in question has existed would be worth while. He expects his work to be useful in two ways : First, in broadening the general view of human life by comprehending in our mental vision this important phase of it, and by enabling us to realize, in some measure, the true status of certain men who, down to the present, are either exalted, by the average self conscious individual, to the rank of gods, or, adopting the other extreme, are adjudged insane. And in the second place he hopes to furnish aid to his fellow men in a far more practical and impor- tant sense. The view he takes is that our descendants will sooner or later reach, as a race, the condition of cosmic consciousness, just as, long ago, our ancestors passed from simple to self consciousness. He believes that this step in evolution is even now being made, since it is clear to him both that men with the faculty in question are becoming more and more common and also that as a race we are approaching nearer and nearer to that stage of the self conscious mind from which the transition to the cosmic conscious is effected. He realizes that, granted the necessary heredity, any individual not already beyond the age may enter cosmic consciousness. He knows that intelligent contact with cosmic conscious minds assists self conscious indi- viduals in the ascent to the higher plane. He therefore hopes, by bringing about, or at least facilitating this contact, to aid men and women in making the almost infinitely important step in question. II. The immediate future of our race, the writer thinks, is indescribably hope- ful. There are at the present moment impending over us three revolutions, the least of which would dwarf the ordinary historic upheaval called by that name into absolute insignificance. They are : (i) The material, economic and social revolution which will depend upon and result from the establish- ment of aerial navigation. (2) The economic and social revolution which will abolish individual ownership and rid the earth at once of two immense evils — riches and poverty. And (3) The psychical revolution of which there is here question. Either of the first two would (and will) radically change the conditions of, and greatly uplift, human life ; but the third will do more for humanity than both of the former, were their importance multiplied by hundreds or even thousands. 4 Cosmic Consciousness The three operating (as they will) together will literally create a new heaven and a new earth. Old things will be done away and all will become new. Before aerial navigation national boundaries, tariffs, and perhaps distinc- tions of language will fade out. Great cities will no longer have reason for being and will melt away. The men who now dwell in cities will inhabit in summer the mountains and the sea shores ; building often in airy and beau- tiful spots, now almost or quite inaccessible, commanding the most extensive and magnificent views. In the winter they will probably dwell in communi- ties of moderate size. As the herding together, as now, in great cities, so the isolation of the worker of the soil will become a thing of the past. Space will be practically annihilated, there will be no crowding together and no enforced solitude. Before Socialism crushing toil, cruel anxiety, insulting and demoralizing riches, poverty and its ills will become subjects for historical novels. In contact with the flux of cosmic consciousness all religions known and named to-day will be melted down. The human soul will be revolutionized. Religion will absolutely dominate the race. It will not depend on tradition. It will not be believed and disbelieved. It will not be a part of life, belong- ing to certain hours, times, occasions. It will not be in sacred books nor in the mouths of priests. It will not dwell in churches and meetings and forms and days. Its life will not be in prayers, hymns nor discourses. It will not depend on special revelations, on the words of gods who came down to teach, nor on any bible or bibles. It will have no mission to save men from their sins or to secure them entrance to heaven. It will not teach a future immortality nor future glories, for immortality and all glory will exist in the here and now. The evidence of immortality will live in every heart as sight in every eye. Doubt of God and of eternal life will be as impossible as is now doubt of existence ; the evidence of each will be the same. Religion will govern every minute of every day of all life. Churches, priests, forms, creeds, prayers, all agents, all intermediaries between the individual man and God will be permanently replaced by direct unmistakable intercourse. Sin will no longer exist nor will salvation be desired. Men will not worry about death or a future, about the kingdom of heaven, about what may come with and after the cessation of the life of the present body. Each soul will feel and know itself to be immortal, will feel and know that the entire universe with all its good and with all its beauty is for it and belongs to it forever. The world peopled by men possessing cosmic consciousness will be as far removed from the world of to-day as this is from the world as it was before the advent of self consciousness. First Words 5 III. There is a tradition, probably very old, to the effect that the first man was innocent and happy until he ate of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. That having eaten thereof he became aware that he was naked and was ashamed. Further, that then sin was born into the world, the miserable sense whereof replaced man’s former feeling of innocency. That then and not till then man began to labor and to cover his body. Stranger than all (so it seems to us), the story runs, that along with this change or immediately following upon it there came into man’s mind the feinarkable conviction which has never since left it but which has been kept alive by its own inherent vitality and by the teaching of all true seers, prophets and poets that this accursed thing which has bitten man’s heel (laming him, hin- dering his progress and especially making this halting and painful) should eventually be crushed and subjugated by man himself — by the rising up within him of a Saviour — the Christ. Man’s progenitor was a creature (an animal) walking erect but with sim- ple consciousness merely. He was (as are to-day the animals) incapable of sin or of the feeling of sin and equally incapable of shame (at least in the human sense). He had no feeling or knowledge of good and evil. He as yet knew nothing of what we call work and had never labored. From this state he fell (or rose) into self consciousness, his eyes were opened, he knew that he was naked, he felt shame, acquired the sense of sin (became in fact what is called a sinner), and learned to do certain things in order to encom- pass certain ends — that is, he learned to labor. For weary eons this condition has lasted — the sense of sin still haunts his pathway — by the sweat of his brow he still eats bread — he is still ashamed. Where is the deliverer, the Saviour ? Who or what ? The Saviour of man is Cosmic Consciousness — in Paul’s language — the Christ. The cosmic sense (in whatever mind it appears) crushes the ser- pent’s head — destroys sin, shame, the sense of good and evil as contrasted one with the other, and will annihilate labor, though not human activity. The fact that there came to man along with or immediately after his acqui- sition of self consciousness the inchoate premonition of another and higher consciousness which was yet, at that time, many milleniums in the future is surely most noteworthy though not necessarily surprising. We have in biology many analogous facts such as premonition of, and preparation for, by the individual of states and circumstances of which he has had no experience and we see the same thing in the maternal instinct in the very young girl. 6 Cosmic Consciousness The universal scheme is woven in one piece and is permeable to con- sciousness or (and especially) to sub-consciousness throughout and in every direction. The universe is a vast, grandiose, terrible, multiform yet uni- form evolution. The section which especially concerns us is that which extends from brute to man, from man to demigod, and constitutes the im- posing drama of humanity — its scene the surface of the planet — its time a million years. IV. The purpose of these preliminary remarks is to throw as much light as possible on the subject of this volume, so as to increase the pleasure and profit of its perusal. A personal exposition of the writer’s own introduction to the main fact treated of will perhaps do as much as anything else could to further this end. He will therefore frankly set down here a very brief outline of his early mental life and give a short account of his slight experience of what he calls cosmic consciousness. The reader will readily see therefrom whence came the ideas and convictions presented in the following pages. He was born of good middle class English stock and grew up almost without education on what was then a backwoods Canadian farm. As a child he assisted in such labor as lay within his power. Tended cattle, horses, sheep, pigs ; brought in firewood, worked in the hay field, drove oxen and horses, ran errands. His pleasures were as simple as his labors. An occa- sional visit to a neighboring small town, a game of ball, bathing in the creek that ran through his father’s farm, the making and sailing of mimic ships, the search for birds’ eggs and flowers in the spring, and for wild fruits in the summer and fall, afforded him, with his skates and handsled in the winter, his homely, much loved recreations. While still a young boy he read with keen appreciation Marryat’s novels, Scott’s poems and novels, and other similar books dealing with outdoor nature and human life. He never, even as a child, accepted the doctrines of the Christian church ; but, as soon as old enough to dwell at all on such themes, conceived that Jesus was a man — great and good no doubt, but a man. That no one would ever be con- demned to everlasting pain. That if a conscious God existed he was the supreme master and meant well in the end to all ; but that, this visible life here being ended, it was doubtful, or more than doubtful, whether conscious identity would be preserved. The boy (even the child) dwelt on these and similar topics far more than anyone would suppose ; but probably not more than many other introspective small fellow mortals. He was subject at times to a sort of ecstasy of curiosity and hope. As on one special occasion when about ten years old he earnestly longed to die that the secrets of the beyond. First Words 7 if there was any beyond, might be revealed to him ; also to agonies of anxiety and terror, as for instance, at about the same age he read Reynold’s “Faust,” and, being near its end one sunny afternoon, he laid it down utterly unable to continue its perusal, and went out into the sunshine to recover from the horror (after more than fifty years he distinctly recalls it) which had seized him. The boy’s mother died when he was only a few years old, and his father shortly afterwards. The outward circumstances of his life in some respects became more unhappy than can readily be told. At sixteen the boy left home to live or die as might happen. For five years he wandered over North Amer- ica from the great Lakes to the Gulf of Mexico and from the Upper Ohio to San Francisco. He worked on farms, on railways, on steamboats, and in the placer diggings of Western Nevada. Several times he nearly suffered ship- wreck by sickness, starvation, freezing, and once on the banks of the Hum- boldt River, in Utah, fought for his life half a day with the Shoshone Indians. After five years’ wandering, at the age of twenty-one, he returned to the country where his childhood had been passed. A moderate sum of money from his dead mother enabled him to spend some years in study, and his mind, after lying so long fallow, absorbed ideas with extraordinary facility. He graduated with high honors four years after his return from the Pacific Coast. Outside of the collegiate course he read with avidity many speculative books, such as the “Origin of Species,” Tyndall’s “Heat” and “Essays, ” Buckle’s “ History,” “ Essays and Reviews,” and much poetry, especially such as seemed to him free and fearless. In this species of literature he soon pre- ferred Shelley, and of his poems, “Adonias” and “Prometheus” were his favorites. His life for some years was one passionate note of interrogation, an unappeasable hunger for enlightenment on the basic problems. Leaving college, he continued his search with the same ardor. Taught himself French that he might read Auguste Comte, Hugo and Renan, and German that he might read Goethe, especially “Faust.” At the age of thirty he fell in with “ Leaves of Grass,” and at once saw that it contained, in greater measure than any book so far found, what he had so long been looking for. He read the “ Leaves ” eagerly, even passionately, but for several years derived little from them. At last light broke and there was revealed to him (as far per- haps as such things can be revealed) at least some of the meanings. Then occurred that to which the foregoing is preface. It was in the early spring, at the beginning of his thirty-sixth year. He and two friends had spent the evening reading Wordsworth, Shelley, Keats, Browning, and especially Whitman. They parted at midnight, and he had a long drive in a hansom (it was in an English city). His mind, deeply. 8 Cosmic Consciousness under the influence of the ideas, images and emotions called up by the reading and talk of the evening, was calm and peaceful. He was in a state of quiet, almost passive enjoyment. All at once, without warning of any kind, he found himself wrapped around as it were by a flame-colored cloud. For an instant he thought of fire, some sudden conflagration in the great city; the next he knew that the light was within himself. Directly after- wards came upon him a sense of exultation, of immense joyousness accom- panied or immediately followed by an intellectual illumination quite impos- sible to describe. Into his brain streamed one momentary lightning-flash of the Brahmic Splendor which has ever since lightened his life ; upon his heart fell one drop of Brahmic Bliss, leaving thenceforward for always an after taste of heaven. Among other things he did not come to believe, he saw and knew that the Cosmos is not dead matter but a living Presence, that the soul of man is immortal, that the universe is so built and ordered that without any peradventure all things work together for the good of each and all, that the foundation principle of the world is what we call love and that the happiness of every one is in the long run absolutely certain. He claims that he learned more within the few seconds during which the illumi- nation lasted than in previous months or even years of study, and that he learned much that no study could ever have taught. The illumination itself continued not more than a few moments, but its effects proved ineffaceable ; it was impossible for him ever to forget what he at that time saw and knew; neither did he, or could he, ever doubt the truth of what was then presented to his mind. There was no return that night or at any other time of the experience. He subsequently wrote a book (28a.) in which he sought to embody the teaching of the illumination. Some who read it thought very highly of it, but (as was to be expected for many reasons) it had little circulation. The supreme occurrence of that night was his real and sole initiation to the new and higher order of ideas. But it was only an initiation. He saw the light but had no more idea whence it came and what it meant than had the first creature that saw the light of the sun. Years afterwards he met C. P., of whom he had often heard as having extraordinary spiritual insight. He found that C. P. had entered the higher life of which he had had a glimpse and had had a large experience of its phenomena. His conversa- tion with C. P. threw a flood of light upon the true meaning of what he had himself experienced. Looking round then upon the world of man, he saw the significance of the subjective light in the case of Paul and in that of Mohammed. The secret First Words 9 of Whitman’s transcendent greatness was revealed to him. Certain conver- sations with J. H. J. and with J. B. helped him not a little. Personal inter- course with Edward Carpenter, T. S. R., C. M. C. and M. C. L. assisted greatly in the broadening and clearing up of his speculations, in the extension and co-ordination of his thought. But much time and labor were still required before the germinal concept could be satisfactorily elaborated and matured, the idea, namely, that there exists a family sprung from, living among, but scarcely forming a part of ordinary humanity, whose members are spread abroad throughout the advanced races of mankind and throughout the last forty centuries of the world’s history. The trait that distinguishes these people from other men is this : Their spiritual eyes have been opened and they have seen. The better known members of this group who, were they collected together, could be accomo- dated all at one time in a modern drawing-room, have created all the great modern religions, beginning with Taoism and Buddhism, and speaking gen- erally have created, through religion and literature, modern civilization. Not that they have contributed any large numerical proportion of the books which have been written, but that they have produced the few books which have inspired the larger number of all that have been written in modern times. These men dominate the last twenty-five, especially the last five, centuries as stars of the first magnitude dominate the midnight sky. A man is identified as a member of this family by the fact that at a certain age he has passed through a new birth and risen to a higher spiritual plane. The reality of the new birth is demonstrated by the subjective light and other phenomena. The object of the present volume is to teach others what little the writer himself has been able to learn of the spiritual status of this new race. V. It remains to say a few words upon the psychological origin of what is called in this book Cosmic Consciousness, which must not be looked upon as being in any sense supernatural or supranormal — as anything more or less than a natural growth. Although in the birth of Cosmic Consciousness the moral nature plays an important part, it will be better for many reasons to confine our attention at present to the evolution of the intellect. In this evolution there are four distinct steps. The first of them was taken when upon the primary quality of excitability sensation was established. At this point began the acquisition and more or less perfect registration of sense impressions — that is, of percepts. lO Cosmic Consciousness A percept is of course a sense impression — a sound is heard or an object seen and the impression made is a percept. If we could go back far enough we should find among our ancestors a creature whose whole intellect was made up simply of these percepts. But this creature (whatever name it ought to bear) had in it what may be called an eligibility of growth, and what happened with it was something like this: Individually and from generation to generation it accumulated these percepts, the constant repetition of which, calling for further and further registration, led, in the struggle for existence and, under the law of natural selection, to an accumulation of cells in the cen- tral sense ganglia ; the multiplication of cells made further registration pos- sible ; that, again, made further growth of the ganglia necessary, and so on. At last a condition was reached in which it became possible for our ancestor to combine groups of these percepts into what we to-day call a recept. This process is very similar to that of composite photography. Similar percepts (as of a tree) are registered one over the other until (the nerve center having become competent to the task) they are generalized into, as it were, one per- cept ; but that compound percept is neither more nor less than a recept — a something that has been received. Now the work of accumulation begins again on a higher plane: the sensory organs keep steadily at work manufacturing percepts ; the receptual centers keep steadily at work manufacturing more and yet more recepts from the old and the new percepts ; the capacities of the central ganglia are con- stantly taxed to do the necessary registration of percepts, the necessary elab- oration of these into recepts and the necessary registration of recepts ; then as the ganglia by use and selection are improved they constantly manufacture from percepts and from the initial simple recepts, more and more complex, that is, higher and higher recepts. At last, after many thousands of generations have lived and died, comes a time when the mind of the animal we are considering has reached the highest possible point of purely receptual intelligence ; the accumulation of percepts and of recepts has gone on until no greater stores of impressions can be laid up and no further elaboration of these can be accomplished on the plane of receptual intelligence. Then another break is made and the higher recepts are replaced by concepts. The relation of a concept to a recept is somewhat similar to the relation of algebra to arithmetic. A recept is, as I have said, a composite image of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of percepts ; it is itself an image abstracted from many images ; but a concept is that same composite image — that same recept — named, ticketed, and, as it were, dismissed. A concept is in fact neither more nor less than a named First Words 1 1 recept — the name, that is, the sign (as in algebra), standing henceforth for the thing itself, that is, for the recept. Now it is as clear as day to any one who will give the least thought to the subject, that the revolution by which concepts are substituted for recepts increases the efficiency of the brain for thought as much as the introduction of machinery increased the capacity of the race for work — or as much as the use of algebra increases the power of the mind in mathematical calcula- tions. To replace a great cumbersome recept by a simple sign was almost like replacing actual goods — as wheat, fabrics and hardware — by entries in the ledger. But, as hinted above, in order that a recept may be replaced by a concept it must be named, or, in other words, marked with a sign which stands for it — just as a check stands for a piece of baggage or as an entry in a ledger stands for a piece of goods ; in other words, the race that is in possession of concepts is also, and necessarily, in possession of language. i Further, it should be noted, as the possession of concepts implies the possession of lan- guage, so the possession of concepts and language (which are in reality two aspects of the same thing) implies the possession of self consciousness. All this means that there is a moment in the evolution of mind when the re- ceptual intellect, capable of simple consciousness only, becomes almost or quite instantaneously a conceptual intellect in possession of language and self consciousness. When we say that an individual, whether an adult individual long ago or a child to-day does not matter, came into possession of concepts, of language and of self consciousness in an instant, we, of course, mean that the indi- vidual came into possession of self consciousness and of one or a few con- cepts and of one or a few true words instantaneously and not that he entered into possession of a whole language in that short time. In the history of the individual man the point in question is reached and passed at about the age of three years ; in the history of the race it was reached and passed several hundred thousand years ago. We have now, in our analysis, reached the point where we each individ- ually stand, the point, namely, of the conceptual, self conscious mind. In acquiring this new and higher form of consciousness it must not for a moment be supposed that we have dropped either our receptual intelligence or our old perceptual mind ; as a matter of fact we could not live without these any more than could the animal who has no other mind than them. Our intellect, then, to-day is made up of a very complex mixture of percepts, recepts and concepts. Cosmic Consciousness I 2 Let us now for a moment consider the concept. This may be considered as a large and complex recept ; but larger and more complex than any recept. It is made up of one or more recepts combined with probably sev- eral percepts. This extremely complex recept is then marked by a sign ; that is, it is named and in virtue of its name it becomes a concept. The concept, after being named or marked, is (as it were) laid away, just as a piece of checked baggage is marked by its check and piled in the baggage-room. By means of this check we can send the trunk to any part of America without ever seeing it or knowing just where it is at a given moment. So by means of their signs we can build concepts into elaborate calculations, into poems and into systems of philosophy, without knowing half the time anything about the thing represented by the individual concepts that we are using. And here a remark must be made aside from the main argument. It has been noticed thousands of times that the brain of a thinking .man does not exceed in size the brain of a non-thinking wild man in anything like the pro- portion in which the mind of the thinker exceeds the mind of the savage. The reason is that the brain of a Herbert Spencer has very little more work to do than has the brain of a native Australian, for this reason, that Spencer does all his characteristic mental work by signs or counters which stand for concepts, while the savage does all or nearly all his by means of cumbersome recepts. The savage is in a position comparable to that of the astronomer who makes his calculations by arithmetic, while Spencer is in the position of one who makes them by algebra. The first will fill many great sheets of paper with figures and go through immense labor ; the other will make the same calculations on an envelope and with comparatively little mental work. The next chapter in the story is the accumulation of concepts. This is a double process. From the age, we will say, of three years each one accu- mulates year by year a larger and larger number, while at the same time the individual concepts are becoming constantly more and more complex. Con- sider for instance the concept science as it exists in the mind of a boy and of a middle aged thinking man ; with the former it stood for a few dozen or a few hundred facts ; with the latter for many thousands. Is there to be any limit to this growth of concepts in number and com- plexity ? Whoever will seriously consider that question will see that there must be a limit. No such process could go on to infinity. Should nature attempt such a feat the brain would have to grow until it could no longer be fed and a condition of deadlock be reached which would forbid further progress. First Words 13 We have seen that the expansion of the perceptual mind had a necessary limit ; that its own continued life led it inevitably up to and into the recep- tual mind. That the receptual mind by its own growth was inevitably led up to and into the conceptual mind. A priori considerations make it certain that a corresponding outlet will be found for the conceptual mind. But we do not need to depend on abstract reasoning to demonstrate the necessary existence of the supra conceptual mind, since it exists and can be studied with no more difficulty than other natural phenomena. The supra conceptual intellect, the elements of which instead of being concepts are intuitions, is already (in small numbers it is true) an established fact, and the form of consciousness that belongs to that intellect may be called and has been called — Cosmic Consciousness. Thus we have four distinct stages of intellect, all abundantly illustrated in the animal and human worlds about us — all equally illustrated in the indi- vidual growth of the cosmic conscious mind and all four existing together in that mind as the first three exist together in the ordinary human mind. These four stages are, first, the perceptual mind — the mind made up of per- cepts or sense impressions; second, the mind made up of these and recepts — the so called receptual mind, or in other words the mind of simple con- sciousness; third, we have the mind made up of percepts, recepts and con- cepts, called sometimes the conceptual mind or otherwise the self conscious mind — the mind of self consciousness; and, fourth, and last, we have the intuitional mind — the mind whose highest element is not a recept or a con- cept but an intuition. This is the mind in which sensation, simple conscious- ness and self consciousness are supplemented and crowned with cosmic consciousness. But it is necessary to show more clearly still the nature of these four stages and their relation one to the other. The perceptual or sensational stage of intellect is easy enough to understand, so may be passed by in this place with only one remark, namely, that in a mind made up wholly of per- cepts there is no consciousness of any sort. When, however, the receptual mind comes into existence simple consciousness is born, which means that animals are conscious (as we know they are) of the things they see about them. But the receptual mind is capable of simple consciousness only — that is, the animal is conscious of the object which he sees, but he does not know he is conscious of it ; neither is the animal conscious of itself as a dis- tinct entity or personality. In still other words, the animal cannot stand outside of itself and look at itself as any self conscious creature can. This, then, is simple consciousness : to be conscious of the things about one, but 14 Cosmic Consciousness not to be conscious of one’s self. But when I have reached self consciousness I am not only conscious of what I see, but I know I am conscious of it. Also 1 am conscious of myself as a separate entity and personality and I can stand apart from myself and contemplate myself, and can analyze and judge the operations of my own mind as I would analyze and judge anything else. This self consciousness is only possible after the formation of concepts and the consequent birth of language. Upon self consciousness is based all dis- tinctively human life so far, except what has proceeded from the few cosmic conscious minds of the last three thousand years. Finally the basic fact in cosmic consciousness is implied in its name — that fact is consciousness of the cosmos — this is what is called in the East the “ Brahmic Splendor,” which is in Dante’s phrase capable of transhumanizing a man into a god. Whitman, who has an immense deal to say about it, speaks of it in one place as “ in- effable light — light rare, untellable, lighting the very light — beyond all signs, descriptions, languages.” This consciousness shows the cosmos to consist not of dead matter governed by unconscious, rigid, and unintending law ; it shows it on the contrary as entirely immaterial, entirely spiritual and entirely alive ; it shows that death is an absurdity, that everyone and everything has eternal life ; it shows that the universe is God and that God is the universe, and that no evil ever did or ever will enter into it ; a great deal of this is, of course, from the point of view of self consciousness, absurd; it is neverthe- less undoubtedly true. Now all this does not mean that when a man has cosmic consciousness he knows everything about the universe. We all know that when at three years of age we acquired self consciousness we did not at once know all about ourselves ; we know, on the contrary, that after a great many thousands of years of experience of himself man still to-day knows comparatively little about himself considered even as a self conscious per- sonality. So neither does a man know all about the cosmos merely because he becomes conscious of it. If it has taken the race several hundred thou- sand years to learn a smattering of the science of humanity since its aqui- sition of self consciousness, so it may take it millions of years to acquire a smattering of the science of God after its acquisition of cosmic consciousness. As on self consciousness is based the human world as we see it with all its works and ways, so on cosmic consciousness is based the higher religions and the higher philosophies and what comes from them, and on it will be based, when it becomes more general, a new world of which it would be idle to try to speak to-day. The philosophy of the birth of cosmic consciousness in the individual is very similar to that of the birth of self consciousness. The mind becomes First Words 15 overcrowded (as it were) with concepts and these are constantly becoming larger, more numerous and more and more complex ; some day (the condi- tions being all favorable) the fusion, or what might be called the chemical union, of several of them and of certain moral elements takes place ; the result is an intuition and the establishment of the intuitional mind, or, in other words, cosmic consciousness. The scheme by which the mind is built up is uniform from beginning to end : a recept is made of many percepts ; a concept of many or several re- cepts and percepts, and an intuition is made of many concepts, recepts and percepts together with other elements belonging to and drawn from the moral nature. The cosmic vision or the cosmic intuition, from which what may be called the new mind takes its name, is thus seen to be simply the complex and union of all prior thought and experience — just as self consciousness is the complex and union of all thought and experience prior to it. PART II. EVOLUTION AND DEVOLUTION. Chapter i. To Self Consciousness. It will be necessary, in the first place, for the reader of this book to have before his mind a tolerably complete idea in outline of mental evolution in all its three branches — sensuous, intellectual and emotional — up to and through the status of self consciousness. Without such a mental image as basis for the new conception this last (that is, cosmic consciousness) to most people would seem extravagant and even absurd. With such necessary foundation the new concept will appear to the intelligent reader what it is : A matter of course — an inevitable sequel to what preceded and led up to it. In attempt- ing to give an idea of this vast evolution of mental phenomena from its beginning in far off geologic ages down to the latest phases reached by our own race anything like an exhaustive treatise could not, of course, be thought of here. The method actually adopted is more or less broken and frag- mentary, but enough (it is thought) is given for the present purpose, and those who desire more will have no difficulty in finding it in other treatises, such as the admirable work of Romanes [134]. All the present writer aims at is the exposition of cosmic consciousness and a barely sufficient account of the lower mental phenomena to make that subject fully intelligible ; any- thing further would only burden this book to no good purpose. The upbuilding or unfolding of the knowable universe presents to our minds a series of gradual ascents each divided from the next by an apparent leap over what seems to be a chasm. For instance, and to begin not at the beginning, but midway : Between the slow and equable development of the inorganic world which prepared it for the reception and support of living creatures and the more rapid growth and branching of vital forms, these having once appeared, there occurred what seems like the hiatus between the inorganic and organic worlds and the leap by which it was over-passed ; within which hiatus or chasm has heretofore resided either the substance or shadow of a god whose hand has been deemed necessary to lift and pass on the elements from the lower to the higher plane. Along the level road of the formation of suns and planets, of earth crust, of rocks and soil, we are carried, by evolutionists, smoothly and safely ; but i8 Cosmic Consciousness when we reach this perilous pit stretching interminably to right and left across our path, we pause, and even so able and daring a pilot as Lester Ward (190. 300-320) can hardly induce us to attempt the leap with him, so wide and dark frowns the abyss. We feel that nature, who has done all — and much greater things — was competent to cross and did cross the apparent break, although we may not at present be able to place a finger in each one of her footprints. For the moment, however, this stands the first and great- est of the so-called bars to acceptance of the doctrine of absolute continuity in the evolution of the visible world. Later in the history of creation comes the beginning of Simple Conscious- ness. Certain individuals in some one leading species in the slowly unfold- ing life of the planet, some day — for the first time — become conscious ; know that there exists a world, a something, without them. Less dwelt upon, as it has been, this step from the unconscious to the conscious might well impress us as being as immense, as miraculous and as divine as that from the inorganic to the organic. Again, running parallel with the river of time, we perceive a long, equa- ble and gradual ascent stretching from the dawn of Simple Consciousness to its highest excellence in the best prehuman types — the horse, the dog, the elephant and the ape. At this point confronts us another break comparable to those which in order of time preceded it — the hiatus, namely, or the seem- ing hiatus between Simple and Self Consciousness : the deep chasm or ravine upon one side of which roams the brute while upon the other dwells man. A chasm into which enough books have been thrown to have sufficed (could they have been converted into stones or pig iron) to dam or bridge a great river. And which has only now been made safely passable by the lamented G. J. Romanes, by means of his valuable treatise on the “ Origin of Human Faculty” [134]. Only a very short time ago (and even yet by most) this break in the line of ascent (or descent) was supposed to be impassable by ordinary growth. It may be said to be now known to be so passable, but it still stands out and apart from the even path of Cosmic development before our vision as that broad chasm or gap between the brute and the man. For some hundreds of thousands of years, upon the general plane of Self Consciousness, an ascent, to the human eye gradual, but from the point of view of cosmic evolution rapid, has been made. In a race, large brained, walking erect, gregarious, brutal, but king of all other brutes, man in appear- ance but not in fact, the so-called alalus homo, was, from the highest Simple Consciousness born the basic human faculty Self Consciousness and its twin. On the Plane of Self Consciousness 19 language. From these and what went with these, through suffering, toil and war ; through bestiality, savagery, barbarism ; through slavery, greed, effort ; through conquests infinite, through defeats overwhelming, through struggle unending ; through ages of aimless semi-brutal existence ; through subsist- ence on berries and roots ; through the use of the casually found stone or stick ; through life in deep forest, with nuts and seeds, and on the shores of waters with mollusks, crustaceans, and fish for food ; through that greatest, perhaps, of human victories, the domestication and subjugation of fire ; through the invention and art of the bow and arrow ; through the taming of animals and the breaking of them to labor ; through the long learning which led to the cultivation of the soil ; through the adobe brick and the building of houses therefrom ; through the smelting of metals and the slow births of the arts which rest upon these ; through the slow making of alphabets and the evolution of the written word ; in short, through thousands of centuries of human life, of human aspiration, of human growth, sprang the world of men and women as it stands before us and within us to-day with all its achievements and possessions [124. 10-13]. Is that all ? Is that the end ? No. As life arose in a world without life ; as Simple Consciousness came into existence where before was mere vitality without perception ; as Self Consciousness leaping widewinged from Simple Consciousness soared forth over land and sea, so shall the race of man which has been thus established, continuing its beginningless and endless ascent, make other steps (the next of which it is now in act of climbing) and attain to a yet higher life than any heretofore experienced or even conceived. And let it be clearly understood that the new step (to explain which this volume is written) is not simply an expansion of self consciousness but as distinct from it as that is, from simple consciousness or as is this last from mere vitality without any consciousness at all, or as is the latter from the world of inorganic matter and force which preceded it and from which it proceeded. Chapter 2. On the Plane of Self Consciousness. I. And in the first place it would be well to get a firm hold of the meaning of the words “self consciousness,” upon the definition of which an excellent writer and most competent thinker [200-255] has these remarks : “Self con- 20 Cosmic Consciousness sciousness is often referred to as a distinguishing characteristic of man. Many, however, fail to gain a clear conception of what this faculty is. Dr. Carpenter confounds it with the ‘ power of reflecting on their own mental states,’ while Mr. Darwin associates it with abstraction and other of the deriv- ative faculties. It is certainly something much simpler than introspection, and has an earlier origin than the highly derivative speculative faculties. If it could only be seized and clearly understood, self consciousness would doubtless prove to be the primary and fundamental human attribute. Our language seems to lack the proper word to express it in its simplest form. ‘ Think ’ approaches this most nearly, and man is sometimes described as a ‘ thinking being.’ The German language has a better word, viz., besinnen, and the substantive Besonnenheit seems to touch the kernel of the prob- lem. Schopenhauer says : ‘ The animal lives without any Besonnenheit. It has consciousness, i. e., it knows itself and its weal and woe ; also the objects which produce these ; but its knowledge remains constantly subjective, never becomes objective : everything that it embraces appears to exist in and of itself, and can therefore never become an object of representation nor a prob- lem for meditation. Its consciousness is thus wholly immanent. The con- sciousness of the savage man is similarly constituted in that his perceptions of things and of the world remain preponderantly subjective and immanent. He perceives things in the world, but not the world ; his own actions and passion, but not himself.’ ” Perhaps the simplest definition (and there are scores of them) would be : self consciousness is the faculty by which we realize. Or again : without self consciousness a sentient creature can know, but its possession is neces- sary in order that he may know that he knows. The best treatise so far written on this subject is Romanes’ book, already several times referred to [134]- The roots of the tree of life being deep sunk in the organic world, its trunk is made up as follows : Beginning at the earth level we have first of all the lowest forms of life unconscious and insensate. These in their turn give birth to forms endowed with sensation and later to forms endowed with Simple Consciousness. From the last, when the right time comes, springs self con- sciousness and (as already said) in direct ascent from that Cosmic Conscious- ness. It is only necessary in this place, as clearing the ground for the work to be done, to point out that the doctrine of the unfolding of the human being, regarded from the side of psychology, is strictly in accord with the theory of evolution in general as received and taught to-day by the foremost thinkers. This tree which we call life and its upper part human life and human On the Plane of Self Consciousness 21 mind, has simply grown as grows any other tree, and besides its main stem, as above indicated, it has, as in the case of other trees, thrown off many branches. It will be well to consider some of these. It will be seen that some of them are given off from the lower part of the trunk, as, for instance, contractility, from which great limb, and as a part of it, springs all muscular action from the simple movement of the worm to the marvelously co-ordi- nated motions made, in the exercise of their art, by a Liszt or a Paderewski. Another of these large lower limbs is the instinct of Self-preservation and (twin with it) the instinct of the continuance of the species — the preservation of the race. Higher up the special senses shoot out from the main trunk and as they grow and divide and again divide they become large and vitally important branches of the great tree. From all these main off-shoots spring smaller arms and from these more delicate twigs. Thus from the human intellect whose central fact is Self Consciousness, a section of the main trunk of our tree, spring judgment, reason, comparison, imagination, abstraction, reflection, generalization. From the moral or emo- tional nature, one of the largest and most important of the main limbs, spring love (itself a great branch dividing into many smaller branches), reverence, faith, fear, awe, hope, hate, humor and many more. The great branch called the sense of sight, which in its beginning was a perception of the difference between light and darkness, sent out twigs which we call sense of form, of distance, and later the color sense. The limb named sense of hearing has for branches and twigs the apprehension of loudness, of pitch, of distance, of direction and as a delicate twig just coming into being, the musical sense. II. The important fact to notice at present is that, true to the simile of the tree here adopted, the numerous faculties of which (viewed from the side of dynamics) man is composed are all of different ages. Each one of them came into existence in its own time, i. e., when the psychic organism (the tree) was ready to produce it. For instance : Simple Consciousness many millions of years ago ; Self Consciousness perhaps three hundred thousand years. Gen- eral vision is enormously old, but the color sense probably only about a thousand generations. Sensibility to sound many millions of years, while the musical sense is now in the act of appearing. Sexual instinct or passion arose far back in geologic ages — the human moral nature of which human sexual love is a young and vigorous branch does not appear to have been in exist- ence many tens of thousands of years. 22 Cosmic Consciousness III. To make what has been and what remains to be said more readily and more fully intelligible it will be well to go into some little detail as to the time and mode of becoming and developing of a few faculties as a sample of the divine work that has been going on within us and about us since the dawn of life on this planet. The science of human psychology (in order to illustrate the subject of this volume) should give an account of the human intellect, of the human moral nature, and of the senses. Should give a description of these as they exist to-day, of their origin and evolution and should forecast their future course of either decay or further expansion. Only a very few specimen pages of such a work can be here set forth — and first a hasty glance at the intellect. The intellect is that part of the mind which knows, as the moral nature is the part that feels. Each particular act of the intellect is instantaneous, whereas the acts (or rather states) of the moral nature are more or less con- tinuous. Language corresponds to the intellect and is therefore capable of expressing it perfectly and directly ; on the other hand, the functions of the moral nature (belonging, i. e., deriving, as they do, from the great sympa- thetic nervous system — while the intellect and speech rest upon and spring from the Cerebro-Spinal) are not connected with language and are only capable of indirect and imperfect expression by its agency. Perhaps music, which certainly has its roots in the moral nature, is, as at present existing, the beginning of a language which will tally and express emotion as words tally and express ideas [28a. 106] . Intellectual acts are complex, and decomposable into many parts ; moral states are either absolutely simple (as in the case of love, fear, hate) or nearly so ; that is, are composed of comparatively few ele- ments. All intellectual acts are alike, or nearly alike, in that regard ; moral states have a very wide range of degree of intensity. The human intellect is made up principally of concepts, just as a forest is made up of trees or a city of houses ; these concepts are mental images of things, acts, or relations. The registration of these we call memory, the com- parison of them one with another reasoning ; for the building of these up into more complex images (as bricks are built into a house) we have in English no good expression ; we sometimes call this act imagination (the act of forming a mental copy or likeness) — the Germans have a better name for it — they call it Vorstellung (the act of placing before), Anschauungsgabe (the gift of look- ing upon) and better still Einbildungskraft (the power of building up). The large intellect is that in which the number of concepts is above the average ; On the Plane Of Self Consciousness 23 the fine intellect is that in which these are clear cut and well defined ; the ready intellect is that in which they are easily and quickly accessible when wanted, and so on. The growth of the human intellect is the growth of the concepts, i. e., the multiplication of the more simple and at the same time the building up of these into others more and more complex. Although this increase in number and complexity is taking place con- stantly in every active mind during at least the first half of life, from infancy to middle age, and though we each know that we have concepts now that we had not some time ago, yet probably the wisest of us could not tell from ob- servation made upon his own mind just by what process these new concepts came into existence — where they came from or how they came. But though we cannot perceive this by direct observation either of our own mind or that of another person, still there is another way by which the occult process can be followed and that is by means of language. As said above, language is the exact tally of the intellect : for every concept there is a word or words and for every word there is a concept ; neither can exist apart from the other. So Trench says : “You cannot impart to any man more than the words which he understands either now contain or can be made intelligibly to him to con- tain.” Or as Max Mueller expresses it : “Without speech no reason, without reason no speech.” Speech and the intellect do not correspond with one another in this way by accident, the relation between them is inevitably in- volved in the nature of the two things. Or are they two things ? Or two sides of one thing? No word can come into being except as the expression of a concept, neither can a new concept be formed without the formation (at the same time) of the new word which is its expression, though this “ new word ” may be spelled and pronounced as is some old word. But an old word taking on another and a new meaning in reality becomes two words, an old and a new. Intellect and speech fit one another as the hand and the glove, only far more closely ; say rather they fit as the skin fits the body, or as the pia mater fits the brain, or as any given species in the organic world is fitted by its environment. As is implied in what has been said, it is to be especially noted that not only does language fit the intellect in the sense of covering it in every part and following all its turnings and windings, but it fits it also in the sense of not going beyond it. Words correspond with con- cepts, and with concepts only, so that we cannot express directly with them either sense impressions or emotions, but are forced always to convey these (if at all) by expressing, not themselves, but the impression they make upon our intellect, i. e., the concepts formed from the contemplation of them by 24 Cosmic Consciousness the intellect — in other words, their intellectual image. So that before a sense impression or an emotion can be embodied or conveyed in language a concept has to be formed (supposed more or less truly to represent it), which concept can, of course, be conveyed in words. But as a matter of fact ninety-nine out of every hundred of our sense impressions and emotions have never been represented in the intellect by concepts and therefore remain unexpressed and inexpressible except imperfectly by roundabout description and sugges- tion. There exists in the lower animals a state of matters which serves well to illustrate this proposition. These have acute sense perceptions and strong emotions, such as fear, rage, sexual passion and maternal love, and yet can- not express them because these have no language of their own, and the ani- mals in question have no system of concepts with corresponding articulate sounds. Granted to us our sense perceptions and our human moral natures and we should be as dumb as are the animals had we not along with these an intellect in which they may be mirrored and by which, by means of lan- guage, they can be expressed. As the correspondence of words and concepts is not casual or temporary but resides in the nature of these and continues during all time and under all circumstrnces absolutely constant, so changes in one of the factors must correspond with changes in the other. So evolution of intellect must (if it exist) be accompained by evolution of language. An evolution of language (if it exist) will be evidence of evolution of intellect. What then is here pro- posed is to study (for a few moments) the growth of the intellect by means of an examination of language, i.e., to study the birth, life and growth of con- cepts which cannot be seen, by means of words which are their co-relatives and which can be seen. Sir Charles Lyell, in the “Antiquity of Man” [113], pointed out the parallelism which exists between the origin, growth, decline and death of languages and of species in the organic world. In order to illustrate and at the same time broaden the present argument let us extend the parallel back- ward to the formation of the worlds and forward to the evolution of words and concepts. The accompanying table will serve this purpose as well as, or better than, an eleborately reasoned exposition, and will serve at the same time as a summary of the evolution argument which runs through this volume. On the Plane of Sell Consciousness 25 I. Nebula of Astral System . Nebula of Solar System N. N. N. N. System of Jupiter . Saturn Uranus -j Neptune Mars I Earth L Etc. 2. Eohippus . 1 Mesohippus f Anchitherium .... (Eocene) !■ (Early Mio- -< (Miocene) Size of sheep Size of Fox J cene) ( Miohippus Equus Caballus . . ‘ ‘ Asinus “ Hemionus “ Quagga “ Zebra Dauw Planet 1st Moon . - 2d Moon I 3d Moon 4th Moon Face Horse Carriage Horse Eng. Dray Horse Eng. Hunter Arabian Shetland Pony 3 - 4 - ? — Aryan Latin . . . , Greek Sanscrit Zend Armenian Lithuanian Old Sclavonic L Gothic Pre-root-Aryan root, Spac ^ Latin, Specio, To see, look . . Greek, Skeptomai, I look “ Skeptikos, An enquirer “ Episkopes, An overseer Sanscrit, Pas, To see “ Spasa, A spy ‘ ‘ Spashta, Manifest “ Spas, A guardian O. H. G., Spehan, To look, spy [ “ “ Speha, A spy I" Italian Spanish Portuguese French Wallachian . Rhaetian Expeit Specimen Respect (noun and verb) Spectator Respite Spectacle Despise, Despicable Respective Spite, -ful Spectrum Speculate, -ation Suspect, Suspicious Specious, -ly, -ness Specific, -ation - Inspect, -ion, -or Speculus Species Circumspect, -ion Spice, Spicy Prospect, -ive Special, -ly, -ty Auspicious, Auspices Spicular Respectable Spy (noun or verb) Aspect Prospectus Specify Spectre Venetian Sicilian Calabrian Arcolan Corsican Expecting Expectation Expected Unexpected Expectable Expectancy Expectant Expector 26 Cosmic Consciousness A short study of this tabular statement will make plain how orbs, species, languages and words branch, divide and multiply ; will make intelligible Max Mueller’s estimate that “ every thought that has ever passed through the mind of India” may be reduced to one hundred and twenty-one root con- cepts — that is, to one hundred and twenty-one root words [ii6. 401]; will make us agree with him that, probably, that number might be still further reduced. If we consider for a moment that this means that the millions of Indo-Europeans words now in use as well as many times the number long since dead and forgotten, nearly all sprang from about one hundred roots and that these in their turn probably from half a dozen, and at the same time remember that reason and speech are one, we shall obtain a glimpse of what the human intellect once was in comparison with what it is to-day ; and like- wise it becomes apparent at a glance that the evolution not only of species, languages and words is strictly parallel but that the scheme has probably a still wider, perhaps universal, application. As regards the present thesis the conclusion to be drawn from this comparison is that words, and that therefore the constituent elements of the intellect which they represent and which we call concepts, grow by division and branching, as new species branch off from older, and it seems clear that a normal growth is encouraged and an excess- ive and useless development checked by the same means in the one case as in the other — that is, by natural selection and the struggle for existence. New concepts, and words expressing them, which correspond with some external reality (whether this is a thing, an act, a state, or a relation), and which are therefore of use to man, since their existence places him in more complete relation with the outer world, on which relation his life and welfare depend, are preserved by the process of natural selection and survival of the fittest. Some again which either do not correspond at all, or only imper- fectly, with an objective reality are replaced by others which do correspond or correspond better with the reality which these aimed to express, and so in the struggle for existence fall into disuse and die out. For it is with words as with every other living thing, thousands are pro- duced for one that lives. Towards whatever object the mind is especially turned it throws out words often with marvelous profusion. When some thousands of years ago, Sanscrit being still a living language and the sun and fire looked upon either as actual gods or at least as especially sacred, fire had (instead of a very few names as now) thirty-five and the sun thirty- seven [115, 437]. But much more remarkable examples are those drawn from Arabic, as, for instance, the eighty names for honey, the two hundred for serpent, the five hundred for lion, the one thousand for sword, and the On the Plane of Self Consciousness 27 five thousand seven hundred and forty-four words all relating to the camel, these being subjects upon which the Arab mind is strongly and persistently bent [115. 438]. So again Max Mueller tells us ; “ We can hardly form an idea of the boundless resources of dialects. When literary languages have stereotyped one general term their dialects will supply fifty, though each with its special shade of meaning. If new combinations of thoughts are evolved in the progress of society, dialects will readily supply the required names from the store of their so-called superfluous words. There are not only local and provincial but also class dialects. There is a dialect of shepherds, of sportsmen, of soldiers, of farmers. I suppose there are few persons here present who could tell the exact meaning of a horse’s poll, crest, withers, dock, hamstring, cannon, pastern, coronet, arm, jowl and muzzle. Where the literary language speaks of the young of all sorts of animals, farmers, shepherds and sportsmen would be ashamed to use so general a term. The idiom of nomads, as Grimm says, contain an abundant wealth of manifold expressions for sword and weapons, and for the different stages in the life of cattle. In a more highly cultivated language these expressions become burthensome and superfluous. But in a peasant’s mouth the bearing, calving, falling and killing of almost every animal has its own peculiar term, as the sportsman delights in calling the gait and members of game by different names. Thus Dame Juliana Berners, lady prioress of the nunnery of Sop- well, in the fifteenth century, the reputed author of the ‘ Book of St. Albans,’ informs us that we must not use names of multitudes promiscuously, but we are to say : A congregcyon of people, a boost of men, a felyshyppynge of women, and a bevy of ladyes, we must speak of a herde of hartys, swannys, cranys, or wrennys, a sege of herons, or bytourys, a muster of peacockys, a watche of nyghtyngalys, a flyghte of doves, a claterynge of choughes, a pryde of lyons, a slewthe of beerys, a gagle of geys, a skulke of foxes, a sculle of frerys, a pontyfycalate of prelates, a bomynable syght of monkes, a dronken- shyp of cobblers, and so of other human and brute assemblages. In like manner in dividing game for the table the animals were not carved, but a dere was broken, a gose reryd, a chekyn frusshed, a cony unlacyd, a crane dyspla)"ed, a curlewe unjointyd, a quayle wynggyd, a swanne lyfte, a lambe sholderyd, a heron dysmembryd, a pecocke dysfygured, a samon chynyd, a hadoke sydyd, a sole loynyd, and a breme splayed” [115. 70]. These instances will serve to show how the human intellect feels along the face of the outer world presented to it, attempting a lodgment in each cranny it finds, however slight and precarious may be the hold that it gets. For the mind of man from age to age ceaselessly seeks to master the facts 28 Cosmic Consciousness of the outer world ; its growth indeed consists in tallying or covering these as ivy spreads over, tallies and covers the stones of a wall ; the twig that secures a hold strengthens and puts out other twigs ; that which does not secure a hold after a time ceases to grow and eventually dies. The main thing to notice for our present purpose is that just as in the case of the child learning to talk, the race began also with a few, or, as Geiger [91. 29] says, with a single word. That is to say, man began to think with very few or with a single concept (of course, at that time, and before, he had a large stock of percepts and of recepts [134. 193], otherwise he could have done little with his one or few concepts). From these few or that one the enormous number of concepts and words that have since come into existence have proceeded ; nor will the evolution of the entire human intellect from a single initial concept seem incredible or even very marvelous, to those who bear in mind that the whole complex human body, with all its tissues, organs and parts, is built up of hundreds of millions of cells, each one of which, however much it may differ in structure and function from those belonging to other organs and tissues than its own, is yet lineally descended from the one single primordial cell in which each one of us (and only a few years ago) had his origin As we reach back into the past, therefore, we find language, and with it the human intellect, drawing into a point, and we know that within a meas- urable distance from where we stand to-day they must have both had their beginning. The date of that beginning has been approximately fixed by many writers and from many indications, and we cannot be far astray in placing it (provisionally) about three hundred thousand years anterior to our own times. IV. Much more modern than the birth of the intellect was that of the color sense. We have the authority of Max Mueller [117. 299] for the statement that : “ It is well known that the distinction of color is of late date ; that Xenophanes knew of three colors of the rainbow only — purple, red and yel- low ; that even Aristotle spoke of the tricolored rainbow ; and that Democri- tus knew of no more than four colors — black, white, red and yellow.” Geiger [91. 48] points out that it can be proved by examination of lan- guage that as late in the life of the race as the time of the primitive Aryans, perhaps not more than fifteen or twenty thousand years ago, man was only conscious of, only perceived, one color. That is to say, he did not distinguish any difference in tint between the blue sky, the green trees and grass, the On the Plane of Self Consciousness 29 brown or gray earth, and the golden and purple clouds of sunrise and sun- set. So Pictet [126] finds no names of colors in primitive Indo-European speech. And Max Mueller [i 16 : 616] finds no Sanskrit root whose meaning has any reference to color. At a later period, but still before the time of the oldest literary composi- tions now extant, the color sense was so far developed beyond this primitive condition that red and black were recognized as distinct. Still later, at the time when the bulk of the Rig Veda was composed, red, yellow and black were recognized as three separate shades, but these three included all color that man at that age was capable of appreciating. Still later white was added to the list and then green ; but throughout the Rig Veda, the Zend Avesta, the Homeric poems and the Bible the color of the sky is not once mentioned, therefore, apparently, was not recognized. For the omission can hardly be attributed to accident ; the ten thousand lines of the Rig Veda are largely occupied with descriptions of the sky ; and all its features — sun, moon, stars, clouds, lightning, sunrise and sunset — are mentioned hundreds of times. So also the Zend Avesta, to the writers of which light and fire, both terrestrial and heavenly, are sacred objects, could hardly have omitted by chance all mention of the blue sky. In the Bible the sky and heaven are mentioned more than four hundred and thirty times, and still no mention is made of the color of the former. In no part of the world is the blue of the sky more intense than in Greece and Asia Minor, where the Homeric poems were com- posed. Is it possible to conceive that a poet (or the poets) who saw this as we see it now could write the forty-eight long books of the Iliad and Odyssey and never once either mention or refer to it ? But were it possible to believe that all the poets of the Rig Veda, Zend Avesta, Iliad, Odyssey and Bible could have omitted the mention of the blue color of the sky by mere acci- dent, etymology would step in and assure us that four thousand years ago, or, perhaps, three, blue was unknown, for at that time the subsequent names for blue were all merged in the names for black. The English word blue and the German blau descend from a word that meant black. The Chinese hi-u-an, which now means sky-blue, formerly meant black. The word nil, which now in Persian and Arabic means blue, is derived from the name Nile, that is, the black river, of which same word the Latin Niger is a form. It does not seem possible that at the time when men recognized only two colors, which they called red and black, these appeared to them as red and black appear to us — though just what the sensations were which they so named cannot of course be now ascertained. Under the name red it seems 30 Cosmic Consciousness they included with that color white, yellow and all intermediate tints ; while under the name black they seem to have included all shades of blue and green. As the sensations red and black came into existence by the division of an original unital color sensation, so in process of time these divided. First red divided into red-yellow, then that red into red-white. Black divided into black-green, then black again into black-blue, and during the last twenty-five hundred years these six (or rather these four — red, yellow, green, blue) have split up into the enormous number of shades of color which are now recognized and named. The annexed diagram shows at a glance the order in which the spectrum colors became visible to man. It can be shown in an entirely independent manner that if the color sense did come into existence as here supposed the successive order in which the colors are said (following ancient documents and etymology) to have been recognized by man is actually the order in which they must have been so recognized and the scientific facts now about to be adduced must be admitted to be remarkably confirmatory of the above conclusions, while being drawn from sources entirely separate and distinct. On the Plane of Self Consciousness 31 The solar or other light rays that excite vision are named red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet. These rays differ the one from the other in the length and amplitude of the waves which compose them, and both the length and amplitude of the waves diminish in the order in which the names have just been given. But the force or energy of a light wave — that is to say, its power of exciting vision, is proportional to the square of its amplitude [180. 272, and especially 181. 136]. According to this law the energy — the power of exciting vision — of the red rays is several thousand times as great as the energy of the violet, and there is a regular and rapid decrease of energy as we pass down the spectrum from red to violet. It is plain that if there has been such a thing as a growing perfection in the sense of vision in virtue of which, from being insensible to color the eye became gradually sensible of it, red would necessarily be the first color perceived, then yellow, then green, and so on to violet ; and this is exactly what both ancient literature and ety- mology tell us took place. The comparative modernness of the color sense is further attested by the large number of persons in all countries who are what is called color-blind — that is, persons who are at the present day entirely or partially without color sense. “Wilson’s assersion that probably one in five and twenty is color-blind long remained doubted because not proved in reference to suffciently large numbers. Till we had comparison methods, and principally Hohngren’s, no satisfactory data could be obtained. His in proper hands so quickly decides a case that tests have already been made in thousands of persons. Based on at least two hundred thousand examinations is the result that four per cent, of males are color blind in greater or less degree, and one-fourth of one per cent, of females.” [135. 242.] This would make one case of color-blindness to every forty-seven persons. The degree of universality of the color sense in a race is, of course, an im- portant fact in estimating its degree of evolution as compared with other races. In this connection the following facts are of interest [122. 716]: “In Japan among 1,200 soldiers 1.58 per cent, were red-blind, and 0.833 per cent, green-blind. Among 373 boys i per cent, were red-blind ; among 270 girls 0.4 per cent. Among 596 men examined by Dr. Berry, of Kyoto, 5.45 per cent, showed defective color sense. Among the Japanese, as a whole, the percentage of color-blindness is less than in Europeans or Americans. Among 796 Chinese examined in various places no cases of color-blindness were found, but there was a tendency often seen to mix green and blue. This peculiarity was brought out with much greater emphasis by Dr. Fielde, of Swatow, China, who examined 1,200 Chinese of both sexes, using Thomp- 32 Cosmic Consciousness son’s wool tests. Among the 600 men were 19 who were color-blind, and among 600 women only i. The percentage of color-blindness among Chi- namen is, then, about 3 per cent., and does not vary greatly from that of Europeans.” In color-blindness the general vision is not affected ; the individual dis- tinguishes light and shade, form and distance, as well as do other persons. This also goes to show that the color sense is more superficial, less funda- mental, and probably therefore acquired later than the other powers that belong to the function of sight. For a person could not lose one of the more fundamental elements of vision (the sense of visual form, for instance) and retain the other sight faculties unimpaired. Color-blindness is in fact an instance of what is called atavism, or relapse to a condition which was normal in the ancestry of the individual, but which does not properly belong to the species at the time in which he lives. The fre- quency of this relapse (estimated, as we have seen, to occur in one person out of every forty-seven) indicates that the color sense is comparatively modern ; for atavism is more frequent in inverse proportion to the length of time that has elapsed since the organ or function lost or improperly taken on (as the case may be) has (in the one case) normally existed in the race or (in the other) been discarded in the process of evolution. The rationale of this law (which will be again referred to) is obvious : it depends upon the simple fact that the longer any organ or function has been in existence in a race the more certainly will it be inherited. The existence of color-blindness, then, in so large a percentage of the population shows that the color sense is a modern faculty. The relative visibility of the different colored light rays makes it certain that if the color sense was acquired it would undoubtedly have been so in the order in which philologists claim it actually was acquired, and the concurrence of these two sets of facts, the one drawn from natural philosophy and the other from etymology, together with the fact of color- blindness, is so striking that it seems impossible to refuse assent to the con- clusions reached. V. Another recently acquired faculty is the sense of fragrance. It is not mentioned in the Vedic hymns and only once in the Zend Avesta. Geiger [91. 58] tells us that the custom of offering incense with the sacrifice is not yet met with in the Rig Veda, though it is found in the more recent Yadshur- veda. Among the Biblical books the sense of the fragrance of flowers first makes its appearance in the “ Song of Songs.” According to the descrip- On the Plane of Self Consciousness 33 tion in Genesis there were in Paradise all kinds of trees “ that were pleasant to the sight and good for food,” no mention being made of pleasant odors. The Apochryphal book of Henoch (of the first century B. C., or even later), extant in Ethiopian, likewise describes Paradise, but does not omit to extol the delightful fragrance of the Tree of Knoweledge, as well as other trees, in the Garden of Eden. Besides this evidence it is said to be capable of proof from language that no such sense as that of fragrance existed in the early times of the Indo- Europeans. And it is also worth mentioning in this connection that no ani- mal (although many of these so greatly surpass us in recognition by scent) possesses, so far as we know or can discover, any sense of fragrance, and that children do not acquire it until they are several years old — not, indeed, for several years after they have acquired, more or less perfectly, the sense of color ; thus corresponding in their mental development (as pointed out above) with the evolution of the general human mind, for the color sense probably came into existence in the race many thousand years before the sense of fragrance. VI. Instincts which are both human and animal, as the sexual and maternal, undoubtedly came down to man through long lines of descent and have been in possession of himself and his ancestors for millions of years ; but the human moral nature, though it is rooted in and has grown from these, is of comparatively recent origin. It not only does not go back behind the birth of self consciousness, but it is certainly very much more recent than this. Many that is. Self Consciousness, as has been said, must have come into being some three hundred thousand years ago when the first Alalus Homo uttered the first true word. In the individual to-day nia7i is born when the child becomes self conscious — at the average age of, say, three years. Among the Indo-European races not more than about one individual (so-called idiot) in a thousand grows to maturity without attaining to Self Consciousness. Self Consciousness having appeared in an individual, is only lost in great and rare crises — as in the delirium of fever and in some forms of insanity, notably mania ; on the other hand the human moral nature does not appear in the individual (on the average) until, say, half-way between three years old and maturity. Instead or one or two in a thousand, several times the same number in a hundred are born, grow up and die without a moral nature. In- stead of being lost in great and rare crises it is constantly being temporarily lost. All these indications go to prove that the human moral nature is a 34 Cosmic Consciousness much more recent birth of time than is the human intellect, and that if we suppose the latter to be three hundred thousand years old we cannot sup- pose the former to be anything like that age. VII. Primeval man, from whom we are all descended, has still upon the earth in these later days, two representatives — first, the savage ; second, the child. It would be true to say that the child is a savage and the savage a child, and through the mental state represented by these two, not only each individual member of the race, but the race itself as a whole, has passed. For, as in his intra-uterine evolution the individual man retraces and summarizes in a few brief months the evolution of the human race, physically considered, from the initial unicellular form in which individual life began through all inter- vening phases between that and the human form, resuming in each day the slow evolution of millions of years, so likewise does the individual man in his mental development from birth to maturity retrace and summarize the evolution of the psychical life of the race ; and as the individual physical man begins at the very bottom of the scale as a unicellular monad, so does the psychical man begin on the bottom round of the ladder of mind, and in his ascent of a few dozen months passes through the successive phases each of which occupied in its accomplishment by the race thousands of years. The characteristics of the mind of the savage and of the child will give us, when found, the characteristics of the primeval human mind from which has descended the average modern mind that we know, as well as the exceptional minds of the great men of history of the present day. The chief differences between the primeval, the infantile and the savage mind on the one hand and the civilized mind on the other, is that the first (called for the sake of brevity the lower mind) is wanting in personal force, courage, or faith, and also in sympathy, or affection ; and that it is more easily excited to terror or anger than is the second or civilized mind. There are of course other differences than these between the lower mind and the higher — differences in intellect, and even in sense perceptions ; but these, though great in themselves, have not the supreme significance of the basic, funda- mental, moral differences just mentioned. The lower mind then lacks faith, lacks courage, lacks personal force, lacks sympathy, lacks affection — that is (to sum up), it lacks peace, content, happiness. It is prone to the fear of things known, and still more to vague terror of things unknown ; it is prone to anger, rage, hatred — that is (to again sum up), to unrest, discontent, unhap- On the Plane of Self Consciousness 35 piness. On the other hand, the higher mind (as compared with the lower) possesses faith, courage, personal force, sympathy, affection ; that is, it pos- sesses (relatively) happiness ; is less prone to fear of things known and unknown and to anger and hatred — that is, to unhappiness. The statement thus broadly made does not seem at first sight to mean very much, but in fact it means almost everything ; it contains the key to our past, our present and our future, for it is the condition of the moral nature (thus briefly adverted to) that decides for each one of us, from moment to moment, and for the race at large, from age to age, what sort of a place this world in which we live shall appear to be — what sort of a place it is indeed for each one of us. For it is not our eyes and ears, nor even our intellects, that report the world to us ; but it is our moral nature that settles at last the significance of what exists about us. The members of the human race began by fearing much and disliking much, by loving or admiring little and by trusting still less. It is safe to say that those earliest men of the river drift, and the cave men, their successors, saw little beauty in the outer world in which they lived, though perhaps their eyes, in most other respects, were fully as keen as ours. It is certain that their family affections (as in the case of the lowest savages of to-day) were, to say the least, rudimentary, and that all men outside their immediate family were either feared or disliked, or both. When the race emerges from the cloud-covered past into the light of what may be called inferential history, the view men took of the government of the universe, of the character of the beings and forces by which this government was carried on, of the posi- tion in which man stood to the governing powers, of his prospects in this life and after it, were (as in the case of the lower races of to-day) gloomy in an extreme degree. Since that time neither the world nor the government of the world have changed, but the gradual alteration in the moral nature of man has made it in his eyes a different place. The bleak and forbidding mountains, the awe-inspiring sea, the gloomy forests, the dark and fearful night, all the aspects of nature which in that old time were charged with dread, have in the place of it become clothed with a new and strange beauty. The whole human race and all living things have put on (in our eyes) a charm and sacredness which in the old times they were far from possessing. The governing powers of the universe (obedient to the same beneficent influ- ence) have been gradually converted from demons into beings and forces less and less inimical, more and more friendly, to man ; so that in all re- spects each age has interpreted the universe for itself, and has more or less discredited the interpretations of previous ages. Cosmic Consciousness 36 Which is the correct interpretation ? What mind, of all the vast diversity of the past and present, in all this long series, pictures to itself most correctly the outer world ? Let us see. Let us consider for a moment our spiritual gen- ealogy, and dwell on its meaning. Our immediate ancestors were Christians. The spiritual proginator of Christianity was Judaism. Judaism, having its beginning in that group of tribes collectively called Terachite or Hebrew — Ibrim, those of the other side (i. e., of the Euphrates) — descended from the mythical Ab-orham or Abraham [137-91!] ; these tribes being themselves a twig of the great Semitic branch of the Caucasian race stock, sprang directly from Chaldean polytheism. Chaldean polytheism again in its turn was a development in direct descent of the Sun and Nature worship of the primitive undivided Caucasian family. The Sun and Nature worship again no doubt had its root in, and drew its life from, initial Fetishism, or the direct worship of individual earthly objects. In this long descent (although we apply different names to different parts of the continuous series, as if there were lines of demarcation between these different parts) there has been no break, and in all the thousands of years never such a thing as a new depart- ure. In these spiritual matters the maxim “ Natura non facit saltum” holds as firmly as it does in physics and geology. The whole affair is a simple mat- ter of growth strictly analagous to the unfolding of the branch from the bud, or of the plant from its seed. As has been well said : “La religion etant un des produits vivants de I’humanite doit vivre, c’est-a-dire, changer avec elle ’’ [136 : 45]. And on last analysis it will be found that under the vast di- versity of external appearance, from Fetishism to Christianity — underlying the infinite variety of formulas, creeds and dogmas resumed under these five heads — the essential element upon which all else depends, which underlies all and is the soul of all, is the attitude of the moral nature. And all changes in the intellectual form and outer aspect of religion are as obedient to the gradual change taking place in this as are the movements of the hands and wheels of the watch to the expansive force of its mainspring. The external world stands fast, but the spirit of man continually grows, and as it does so its own vast Brocken shadow (thrown out by the moral nature but shaped by the intellect), which it projects on the midst of the infinite un- known, necessarily (like a dissolving view) changes and changes, following the alterations in the substance (that is, the soul of man) which gives life and reality to the shadowy phantom which plain folk call their creed, and which metaphysicians call the philosophy of the absolute. But in thus interpreting, from age to age, the unknown universe in which we live, it is to be observed that we are (on the whole) constantly giving a On the Plane of Self Consciousness 37 better and better report of it. We attribute to our gods (as the ages pass) better and better characters, and we constantly expect at their hands better and better treatment, both in the present life and after death. That means (of course) that the quantity of trust or faith which we possess is steadily in- creasing and encroaching upon its opposite, fear, which is as constantly lessening. So equally it may be said of charity, sympathy, or affection, that the constant increase of that faculty is steadily changing to us the aspect of the visible world, just as the growth of faith is altering the image we form for ourselves of that greater world which is invisible. Nor is there any indi- cation that this double process has come to an end or that it is likely to come to an end. VIII. The length of time during which the race has been possessed of any given faculty may be more or less accurately estimated from various indica- tions. In cases in which the birth of the faculty took place in comparatively recent times — within, for instance, the last twenty-five or thirty thousand years — philology (as we have seen) may assist materially in determining the approximate date of its appearance. But for comparatively old faculties, such as the human intellect or simple consciousness, this means necessarily entirely fails us. We fall back, then, upon the following tests : 1. The age at which the faculty appears in the individual man at the present time. 2. The more or less universality of the faculty in the adult members of the race to-day. 3. The readiness, or the reverse, with which the faculty is lost — as in sickness. 4. The relative frequency with which the faculty makes its appearance in dreams. I. Of each of our mental faculties it may be predicated that it has its own normal or average age for appearing in the individual ; as, for instance, memory and simple consciousness appear within a few days after birth ; curi- osity ten weeks after ; use of tools twelve months after ; shame, remorse, and a sense of the ludicrous — all of them about fifteen months after birth. Now it is to be noted that in every instance the time of appearance of a faculty in an infant corresponds with the stage at which the same faculty appears (as far as can be at present ascertained) in the ascending animal 38 Cosmic Consciousness scale, just as in the case of later appearing faculties, their age of appearing in the individual corresponds with their period of appearance in the race ; for instance, memory and simple consciousness occur in animals as primitive as the echinodermata, while the use of tools is not met with below monkeys ; and shame and remorse and a sense of the ludicrous are almost if not entirely confined (among animals) to the anthropoid ape and the dog. So of purely human faculties, self consciousness, which appears in the individual at the average age of about three years, made its appearance in the race certainly more than a thousand centuries ago, while the musical sense, which does not appear in the individual before adolescence or puberty, cannot (to judge by the records) have existed in the race more than a very few thousand years. 2. The longer a race has been in possession of a given faculty the more universal will that faculty be in the race. This proposition scarcely needs proof. Every new faculty must occur first of all in one individual, and as other individuals attain to the status of that one they too will acquire it, until, after perhaps many thousand years, the whole race, having attained to that status, the faculty will have become universal. 3. The longer a race has been in possession of a given faculty the more firmly is that faculty fixed in each individual of the race who possesses it. In other words : the more recent is any given faculty the more easily is it lost. Authority for this proposition (which indeed it scarcely needs) will be quoted where it is stated in another connection. It is almost, if not quite, a self- evident proposition. 4. A study of dreaming seems to reveal the fact that in sleep such mind as we have differs from our waking mind, especially by being more primi- tive ; that, in fact, it would be almost strictly true to say that in dreams we pass backward into a prehuman mental life ; that the intellectual faculties which we possess in dreams are, especially, recepts as distinguished from our waking concepts ; while in the moral realm they are equally those faculties, such as remorse, shame, surprise, along with the older and more basic sense functions, which belonged to us before we reached the human plane, and that the more modern mental faculties, such as color sense, musical sense, self consciousness, the human moral nature, have no existence in this condi- tion, or if any of them do occur it is only as a rare exception. Let us now compare one with the other a few of the faculties which have been already mentioned in the light of the rules laid down. To do this will give us, more clearly than perhaps anything else could, a definite notion of the growth of mind by the successive addition of new functions. For this purpose let us take (as a few examples and to stand for all) simple conscious- On the Plane of Self Consciousness 39 ness, shame, self consciousness, color sense, the human moral nature, the musical sense, cosmic consciousness. Simple consciousness makes its appearance in the human infant within a few days after birth ; it is absolutely universal in the human race ; it dates far back before the earliest mammals ; it is lost only in deep sleep and coma; it is present in all dreams. Shame, remorse and a sense of the ludicrous are all said to be born in the human infant at about the age of fifteen months ; they are all prehuman faculties and are all found in the dog and in apes, and they undoubtedly ex- isted in our prehuman ancestors ; they are all almost universal in the race, being absent only in very low idiots ; they are all three common in dreams. Self consciousness makes its appearance in the child at the average age of three years ; it is not present in any species but the human ; it is, in fact, that faculty, the possession of which by an individual constitutes him a man. It is not universal in our race, being absent in all true idiots ; that is, it is permanently absent in about one in each thousand human beings in Europe and America.* There must, however, be many members of low races, such as the Bush- men of South Africa f and native Australians, who never attain to this faculty. * As regards the absence of self consciousness in idiots the examination of the inmates of a large idiot asylum revealed the fact that the faculty was absent in fully ninety per cent. The patients exam- ined were nearly all over ten years of age. Of course a few of them might attain to self conscious- ness later on. Dictionaries and works on idiocy [loi] define an idiot as “ a human being destitute of the ordinary mental powers ” ; but it would seem that “ a human being in whom, the usual age being past, in consequence of atavism, self consciousness has not been developed,” would be more accurate and better. While the definition of imbecile would be : “A human being, who, though self conscious, is, in consequence of atavism, to a large extent destitute of the ordinary mental powers.” -|-For the mental status of Bushmen see Anderson [1-9, 216, 217, 218, 227, 228, 232, 291], who gives the facts from actual observation without speculation or theory ; he is a close observer and evi- dently a faithful reporter. See also some remarkable pages by Olive Schreiner [90-2, 4] in which she describes these same Bushmen (as does Anderson) from personal observation. Along with much else she states, for instance, that : “ These small people had no fixed social organization ; wandering about in hordes or as solitary individuals, without any settled habitation, they slept at night under the rocks or in wild-dog holes, or they made themselves a curious little wall of loose bushes, raised up on the side from which the wind blew, and strangely like an animal’s lair ; and this they left again when the morning broke. They had no flocks or herds and lived on the wild game, or when that failed them, ate snakes, scorpions, insects or offal, or visited the flocks of the Hottentots. They wore no clothing of any kind, and their weapons were bows and arrows, the strings of the bows being made from the sinews of wild animals, and the arrows tipped with sharpened bones or flint stones, poisoned with the juice of a bulb or dipped in the body of a poisonous caterpillar : and these formed their only property. They had no marriage ceremony and no permanent sex relations, any man or woman cohabiting dur- ing pleasure ; maternal feeling was at its lowest ebb, mothers readily forsaking their young or dispos- ing of them for a trifle ; and paternal feeling was non-existent. Their language is said by those who 40 Cosmic Consciousness In our ancestry self consciousness dates back to the first true man. Thou- ands of years must have elapsed between its first appearance and its uni- versality, just as thousands of years are now passing between the first cases of cosmic consciousness and its universality. A race, we are told, unclothed, walking erect,* * gregarious, without a true language, to a limited extent tool- using, destitute of marriage, government, or any institution ; animal, but in virtue of its relatively high moral nature (making it gregarious) and its highly developed receptual intelligence, king of animals, developed self conscious- ness, and by that fact became man. It is impossible to say how long ago it was when this event occurred, but it could not have been less than several hundred thousand years. This faculty is lost much more easily than is simple consciousness. We lose it in coma and also often in the delirium of fever ; in certain forms of insanity, as in mania, it is often lost for weeks and months at a time ; lastly, it is never present in dreams. The color sense has been already considered. It remains to say a few words from the present point of view. It comes into existence gradually in the individual — at three or four years there may be a trace of it. At eight years of age it was found by Jeffries [135-242] still absent in a large per- centage of children. Twenty to thirty per cent, of schoolboys are said to be color-blind, while only four per cent, of adult males are so. Dr. Favre, of Lyons [135-243] reported in 1874 ^ the French Congress for the Advance- ment of Science, at Lille, “ some observations that seemed to him to prove that congenital color-blindness was curable ” [135-242], but it does not seem to have occurred to him that the color sense, being invariably absent in very have closely studied it to be so imperfect that the clear expression of even the very simplest ideas is difficult. They have no word for wife, for marriage, for nation ; and their minds appear to be in the same simple condition as their language. The complex mental operations necessary for the^ mainte- nance of life under civilized conditions they have apparently no power of performing ; no member of the race has in any known instance been taught to read or write, nor to grasp religious conceptions clearly, though great efforts have been made to instruct them.” It seems impossible to believe that as a race these creatures are self conscious. * Walking erect. If the view here taken of mental, and human, evolution should be accepted it would throw some light on our remote past. One corollary from it would be that our ancestors walked erect for hundreds of thousands of years before they became self conscious — that is, before they be- came men and began to speak. The age at which infants begin to walk is (mentally) the age of the dog and the ape. From fifteen or eighteen months to three years of age the child passes through the mental strata which lie between these animals and self consciousness. During that time the child’s receptual intelligence becomes more and more perfect, the recepts themselves become more and more complex, nearer and nearer to concepts, until these last are actually formed and self consciousness is established. It would seem that something like a half million of years of evolution must have elapsed between the status of the highest anthropoid apes and that of man. Perhaps this may be a comforting reflection to those people who do not like the idea of having descended from some Simian form. On the Plane of Self Consciousness 41 young children, and making its appearance at a variable age, as the child advances toward maturity, color blindness would necessarily appear to the teacher, watching the development of the child and exercising its sense of sight upon colors, to be “ cured.” We have seen above that the color sense in the race cannot be many tens a thousands of years old. Color sense is absent in one human being out of every forty-seven. It is seldom present in dreams, and when it does occur, that is, when any color is seen in a dream, it is generally that color which for good reasons was first perceived by man, namely, red. The following occurrence illustrates (in a striking manner) the usual ab- sence of the color sense during the partial consciousness which occurs in sleep. A man whose hair is white dreamed that he was looking in a glass and saw plainly that his hair was not only much thicker than he knew it to be in fact, but instead of being white, as he also knew it to be, it was black. Now he well remembered in his dream that his hair had never been black. It had, in fact, been a light brown. He wondered (it is worth mentioning here that wonder or surprise is a prehuman faculty, and is common in dreams) in his dream that his hair should be black, remembering distinctly that it had never been so. The important thing to note about the dream under consideration is that, though it was clear to the dreamer’s mind that his hair had never been black, yet he did not remember that it had been brown. For some reason there was a difficulty in calling up before con- sciousness any color. The same man dreamed that he had wounded with a knife an enemy who had attacked him ; the bleeding was profuse but the blood was white ; he knew in his dream that it should not be white, but no image of its true color or of any color presented itself. The human moral nature includes many faculties, such as conscience, the abstract sense of right and wrong, sexual love as distinguished from sexual desire or instinct, parental and filial love as distinguished from the corre- sponding instincts (man has both these instincts in common with the brutes as well as the higher feelings), love of our fellow men as such, love of the beautiful, awe, reverence, sense of duty or responsibility, sympathy, compas- sion, faith. No human nature is complete without these and others ; it is therefore a very complex function ; but for the purpose of the present argu- ment it must be treated as if it were a simple sense. Now at what age does this human moral nature appear in individual man ? It is never present in quite young children. It is often still absent at puberty and even at adoles- cence. It is a late acquired faculty. It would probably not be far wrong to say that the average age for its appearance in the individual is somewhere 42 Cosmic Consciousness about fifteen years. It would seem clear from a study of history that our human moral nature cannot be more than some ten or twelve thousand years old. For a careful consideration of the records that have come down to us from the early Romans, Hellenes, Hebrews, Egyptians, Assyrians and Baby- lonians would indicate unmistakably that as we go back into the past this faculty tapers down toward the vanishing point, and if it continues so to taper as we ascend the ages all of what we distinctively call our human moral na- ture would certainly have disappeared by the time we had got back the number of centuries mentioned — ten or twelve thousand years. In what proportion of the men and women of civilized countries does the human moral nature fail to appear ? There are so many men and women who have a partial moral nature, so many who, having little or none, wear (as well as may be) the outer semblance of one ; the judging of men and women in this regard is so difficult — the problem is so veiled and so compli- cated — that it is impossible to give more than an opinion. But let any one who is curious read a few such books as those by Despine [66] and Ellis [76] — then view the men and women among whom he lives by the light thus supplied, and he will be forced to the conclusion that the proportion of the adults who have little or no, or an undeveloped, moral nature is far greater than of those who have little or no, or an undeveloped, color sense. We prob- ably should not be far wrong if we said that at least forty men and women out of every thousand in America and Europe are in the position indicated. Then how many races of men are there still living upon the earth none or very few of the members of which have what could be called from the point of view of our civilization a human moral nature? Again, while self consciousness is lost, not of course always, but frequently, in insanity and fever, the moral nature is, we must all admit, subject to much more frequent lapses and absences and with far less cause. Self consciousness appeared in the race, as we have seen, about three hundred thousand years ago. The above considerations would point to a very much later date for the appearance of the moral nature. And do not all records and historic indications, so far as they go, support this inference ? Finally, the musical sense (a faculty which is now in act of being born) does not appear in the individual before adolescence. It does not exist in more than half the members of our race. It has existed less (perhaps con- siderably less) than five thousand years. It is never, or almost never, present in dreams, even in the case of professional musicians. While self conscious- ness in insanity is lost, as said, occasionally, the musical sense in that condi- tion might be said to be invariably lost — at least after an experience of PSYCHOGENESIS OF MAN— ILLUSTRATED BY A FEW FACULTIES On the Plane of Self Consciousness 43 ^5 *s Vi • Vi a 3 VI c« a Cl c 3 o o c 41 Vi *5 ’~^