ve if p x 1 , M I T I V E ' T ^P T H o*> Or*’ " ; th Ones Delivered to the Saints, •' k By ROBERT K. GREEN, SANDY HOOK, CARTER CO ., A 1. Catlettsburu. Ky. : PRINTED BY THE HERALD PRINTING COMPANY, 1 1869. n y\« l C* P I^I JA I T I V E T I^U T H , Ox the Faith Or.ee Delivered to the Saints, By ROBERT K. GREEN, SliXDY HOOK, CAE TEE CO., KY. Catlettsbckg. Kt. : FEINTED BY THE HERALD PRINTING COMPANY 1869. PEEFACE. To the American People: The-sword having been brought upon the land of profess;:: ~ Is- rael, the author of this Address considers himself called upon (as is actually so that the professional religion of our Lord, Jesus Chris: has made an arm of flesh the God of its salvation) to notify the pe pie to disconnect themselves from its support, or in other words to come out of her my people ; that ye be not partakers of her sins, ar. 1 that ye receive not of her plagues. Your duty is laid down in the 33d Chapter of Ezekiel and 11th verse. Bead the whole Chapter. — Also the S4th. To walk in the statutes of life as recorded in the l';u verse of the 33d is for us to walk in the commandments of the New Testament. Let the injunctions, therefore, of our great leader, Jesus Christ, be strictly observed and you will be granted a right to the tree of life, and a permit to enter in through the gates into thejCity. Read with care eur Lord’s sermon upon the Mount; fail not to notice the injunctions laid upon the Apostles when sending them forth to preach the word. ROBERT K. GREEN. Sandy Hook, Carter Co., Ky. PRIMITIVE TRUTH, OR THE FAITH OHCE DELIVERED TO THE SAINTS. Not having the money to pay for the printing of a publication; which I deemed myself called upon to lay before the people, and which I desired might be read by the whole people, I went to the Ironton Register, Ohio, and prevailed upon him to. give it a place in his paper, hoping that the Editors ot his exchange papers would pay it some attention ; but in this I was disappointed, as T. could not learn that it ever had appeared in any other but the Register. I was then made to present my case to the Editor ol the Cincin- nati Enquirer, hoping that he would admit it into his weekly, which I supposed was a paper of wide circulation. If my request reached him, he paid it no atteniion, or, at least, I could never learn that it ever had been seen in his paper. T did think that if I could succeed in getting before the public the address, having within it a disserta- tion upon the two Chapters of Ezekiel, XXXIII and XXXIV, which was given to me, and which in the address is slightly explained, my duty in respect to that, would be acconiplished. But I am now con- vinced that the dormant, dead state of the public mind, the unwilling- ness of the people-to receive the truth, makes itpecessary that a more extensive comment upon these Chapters should be made. ; I will cen- ter my explanations mainly on the 4th verse of the XXXXVth Chap- ter above quoted : “The diseased have ye not strengthened, neither : have ye healed that which was.sick, neither have ye bound up that which was broken, neither have ye brought again that which was driven away, neither have ye sought that which was lost, but with force and with cruelty have ye ruled them.” This is an index upon the Protestant religion, which J will, how- ever, pass' by at present, and take the Catholic faith first into consid- eration. These people profess to be in practical possession of the word as preached by Christ.and his first followers. Declaring themselves able to show .an unbroken priesthood from the Apostle Peter up to the present time, they, also, life® all other 4 professional followers of Christ, lay claim to the blee'sihg Of Jacob Since a tree is to be known by its fruits, and since' it is unreasonable, unjust and dishonorable to make a profession of religion in one name,/ and walk in the spirit and laws of another ; and further, as it is not right to be halting between two opinions, if the Lord be God follow him ; but if Baal, then follow hM, the truth, therelore, of these pro- fessions will be brought forward, uncovered, and tried by the word. Jacob, like Esaiw, received in his blessing the dew of heaven and the fatness of the earth ; but inasmuch' as niian is not to live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God, therefore, because of a willing heart to' take upon himself the yoke of the command, corn and wine, an emblem of joy and comfort in the Holy Ghost, was added to his portion. But this is not all a gift of dominion over nations and brethren was moreover added, concluding as follows: “Cursed be every one that cursetb thee, and blessed be he tb at bless'eth fhe£.” Ifl EsAu the whole is reversed. We find him a man of the world, sword in hand, forcing his Way or riding in triumph over the heads of his felloivmen — his incitements to action being riches, honor, power and facte ; in the meantime rejecting the word and endeavoring to live by bread alone, tbrohgh the power of the sword, either to defend or obtain it. The question Cow arises, when did tbfe’yoke of Jacob come upo'n the neck of ESau, and V/hen did Esau succeed in breaking it off. I an&wer ffbeh the flesh denying commandments of our Lord Jesus Christ was acknowledged, and obeyed by his first disciples. — Then it w'as that the yoke of Jacob whs fixed upon the neck of Esau. Again, when the Church of Christ departed from its first faith, fell or went into perdition, which took place about four hundred years after Christ, Esau made' himself sufficiently strong to break it off. To return to Jacob, see Matthew X, 10; Mark VI, S, 9. These two Evangelists, VJ-ith reSpeCttorthe transportation of the word, when taken together (ahd this is the manner they should be taken, as they were both present when the order wasSiven,) would read thus : Nor scrip for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, but be shod with sandals, nor yet stave's but & Staff or one only other deprivations are mentioned, which I will leave for the consideration of the reader. Thus it is, we have the first practical sign of the yoke Jof Esau at the beginning of the kingdom of Chri'st. We see him here in a stript, destitute state williuly yielding his neck, harnessed, and sent forth in the gears of Jacob to preach the Word. Let not the reader flatter him- self, or be flattered, that the order respecting the sandals and staff was repealed in the second tnission. It waS to these disciples the five talents were given, with the promise of adding Other five. With them there was no hesitation to count up the cost when a Command was given. Neither did they see Aaekims in the land of Canaan, but they at once obeyed the order, when the wails 0 ? Jericho gave way before them. Or, in other words, 'injunctions of the most disheartening kind wei;e, by them, with ease, surmounted. From the five talents the Church fell |to two, and from the two 3 he fellto one, which she went and digged andilpd in t he earth. Through the love of earthly things, the Ckptcli permitted her tal- ent, the knowledge of the word, to be slighted, neglected, rejected and forgotten, or she made it her chief concern, by the help of carnal weapons, to;feed, cherish, honor and glorify this man of earth only. The slide of the Church .commenced at a veryeai^y day, but her final fall did pot take place until four hundred years after Christ, as has been affirmed, 2 Esdras vii, 26-3;0. Behold the tipie shall come that these tokens which I have told thqeshall come to pass, and the bride shall appear qnd the corpjng .forth shall be seen that now is withdrawn from the earth. Ami yfhp.sqever is delivered from the aforesaid evils .shall see my wonders. For my son Jesus shall be revealed with those that be with him, and they that ^empin shall rejoice within four hun- dred years. After these years shall my son, Christ, die, and all men that have life. A n( i the world shall be turned unto the old silence, seven days like agin the former judgments, so ,tkat po man shall re- main. This book,, by ,a great part of Christendom, is put in the Apocrypha. Isaiah, however, an undisputed prophet, points out the fall with near- ly the same simplicity, saving only he does not name the time, see XXII, 22, 23, 2.4, and 25 : “And the key of the house of David will I lay upon his shoulder, so he shall open, and none .shall .shut, and he shall shqt and none shall open. And I will fasten him as a nail in a sure piace, and he shjiU be for a glorious throne to his father’s house. And they shall. hapg upon him all the glory of his father’s house, the offspring and the issue, all vessels of small quantity, from the vessels of cups e veu. .to all the vessels of flagons. In that day saith the Lord of Hosts shall the nail that is fastened in the sure place be removed, and be cut down and fall, and the burden that was upon it. shall be cut off, for the Lord fyath-spokenit.” Amos VIII, 11, 12 : “Behold the days come, saith the Lord God, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord. And they shalj wander from sea to sea, and frorp the nqrth evep to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek ; the word of the Lord apd shall not find ■it.” Daniel, in his predictions respecting the promised Messiah said, chapter IX, 26 : “After three score and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself.” To make the rejoicing within, as related by the prophet Esdras, to have its beginning after the resurrection of Christ, and the sixty- $!W0 weeks or 434 years (rpbkonipg each day for a year) as mention- 6 ed by the prophet Daniel,- to Commence with thebirth or first coming of Christ, tne two prophet's will be found distinctly harmonizing in pointing to the fall of the Church. These words of Daniel just quot- ed, viz : “But not for himself’ may be explained by taking other Scripture into consideration, Psalms LXXXIX,- 36, 37 : “His seed shall endure forever, and his throne as the sun before me, it shall be established forever as the moon, and as a faithful witness in heaven.” This Seed is the word preached by Christ and his Apostles.” Mat- thew XIII, 22; Mark IV, 14; Psalms CYII, 36, 37. There he mak eth the hungry to dwell that they may prepare a city for habitation, anpsow the fields and plant the vineyard, which may yield fruits of increase. I will here put a question to the reader: have you ever been hungry ? if so, any kind of diet, notwithstanding at other times it might not be very palatable to your taste, would be relished as a dainty. The Apostles were hungry for the truth, and therefore did not hesitate to obey and injunctions their master thought proper to lay upon them. In Isaiah VI, 10, is foreshown the obstinate, unwilling disposition of the Jewish people to receive the word, Our Lord. Matthew XIII, 15, quotes this predietion, and applies its fulfillment to the rejection of himself Isaiah proceees, VI, 11, 12, to foreshadow the destitute, desolate state of the Jewish Church with respect to the truth on their rejection ot the promised Messiah. But yet in It shall he a tenth : verse 13. This tenth, the prophet declares, shall return and shall be eaten as a teil tree, and as an oak whose substance is in them when they cast their leaves. So the holy seed shall be the substance there- of. It is well known that there cannot be a returning until there is a departing or falling away. He first calls it a tenth, which he com- pares to the substance or sap of a tree, when casting or producing its leaves. He concludes by declaring, the holy seed to be the sub- stance or sap of the tree. Let the reader take into' consideration the state of an oak tree during the winter, and he will perceive that so long as the bark cleaves to its branches and trunk, that he cannot very easily distin- guish it from any other tree of the forest, but ’when Spring arrives, the fruit is produced and life is known to be there. This tree, this seed, is the New Testament ; its winter has been between fourteen and fifteen hundred years long. Let us hope that the lime of deliverance is near; that the voice of the turtle may soon be heard in our land. In conclusion, respecting the seed, see Psalms XXII, 30, 31, “A seed shall serve him, it shall be accounted to the Lord ; for a generation the}' shall come and declare his righteousness unto a people that shall be born that he hath done this.” Having devoted some little time and space towards the consid- eration of the seed, the glorious promise to the house of David, let us return to Psalms LXXXIX,- 30,, 31,- 32, “If his children forsake- 7 my law and walk notin my judgments, if they break my statutes and keep not my commandments, then will I visit their transgressions with the rod and their iniquity with stripes. We have before us, not his obedient, faithful seed, but his obsti- nate, transgressing children. THE EALL AND FINAL RESTORATION OF THE JEWS TO' THE TRUTH. First let us take into consideration the case of the Jewish peo- ple. It will appear strange to any one that is acquainted with the writings of the prophets, to see their simple and plain predictions re- specting the looked for Messiah, so distinctly,, so faithfully, and so pointedly verified in the person of our Lord Jesus Christ, that the Jews did not receive and acknowledge him as the Messiah. These, however, may be assigned as the principal leading causes of his re- fection. He offered himself to them, not in the spirit of Esau, but in the spirit of Jacob. There was nothing in his doctrine that was flat- tering to the flesh. He was to the JewS as a root out of the dry ground, Isaiah LIII, 2, “And he hath no form nor comeliness, and when we shall see him there is no beauty that we should desire him.” They were probably looking for something like a Bonaparte, a Caes- ar, or an Alexander, with the colors of Esau flying at the front of his conquering hosts. But the doctrine he insisted on them to receive was to the very re- verse. He waged war, not upon the persons or bodies of men, but directed his assaults upon their hearts, for proof see Matthew V. {43, 44, “Ye have heard that it hath been said thou shalt love thy neigh- bor, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, love your enemies, bless them that curse you and persecute you.” He who justifies a war of defence should read with care the following quotations, same book, XYI, 21-26. For other proof see XXVI, 52, Romans XII, 19, 20, 21, John XVIII, 36, and XI, 48, Second Corinthians, X, 4. Sfheir singular ideas with respect to his coming would not allow them to give him a natural birth. John VII, 27, “They were also offended at the place of his residence. Can anything good come out of Nazareth.” Their high and exalted idea of his august appearance must have been, in a great degree, the cause of his rejection, since in its stead his coming was in the dust of humilitjn His doctrine, as we have already assert- ed, had nothing within it to- please or flatter the flesh, but all to the contrary : whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased, and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted. In settling a dispute which took place between his disciples as to which of them should be called the greatest, he decided their contentions in these words: “If any man desire to be first, the same shall be last of all,” at the same time- taking a little child for an example to show them that the spirit of hu- 8 mility was to take the rule iu his approaching kingdom. The singu- larity of Christ, his flesh denying statutes, his opposition to the world, his denouncing everything in the shape of earthly honor, to- gether with his unusual manner of defending his kingdom without the help of carnal weapons, caused them not to reoeive him, but to reject and crucify him. Often had these people been given up into the hands of the ene- my as -a penalty for transgressing God’s commands, but never, until they took the life of him that never knew sin, but desired the release of a murderer in his stead, crying away with him, crucify him, his blood be on us and our children, did they know what it was to suffer for transgression. It had not been exceeding a half century after the •crucifixion of 'Christ that the Jewish nation, by the power of the Ro- mans, was completely desolated, and they led away captive into all nations, as'Christ himself predicted, Luke XXL 24. Nearly 1800 years have passed away and they are yet under the heel of oppres- sion. Notwithstanding having been in nearly all the strife of con- tending kingdoms, and in all the commotions of struggling and per- ishing empires, dispersed into nearly every clime, and without having a national goverment, continue a separate and distinct people. Will the deist alter having read the history of these much afflicted people, together with the XXVIII of Deuteronomy, showing them the con- sequences that must follow disobedience, and yet maintain his infidel- ity? Is the time not short when the}’ will acknowledge him whom they once rejected? They will find him, though a lamb in the flesh, in their great deliverance, a lion in the spirit. The predictions are many pointing to the great deliverance of Israel, a few of which will now be quoted, Hosea III, 4, 5 ; Zephaniah III, 20; Isaiah XI, 12 ; LXIII, 17, 18, 19. In this quotation may be found the prayers of re- turning Israel. Isaiah XTV, 1, 2, “For the Lord will have mercy on. Jacob, and will yet choose Israel, and set them in their own land, and the strangers shall be joined with them, and they shall cleave to the house of Jacob, and the people shall take them and bring them to their^lace, and the house of Israel shall possess them in the land of the Lord for servants and hand maids, and they shall take them cap- tives, whose captives they were, and they shall Tule over their oppres- sors. Doubtless the Jewish people, from this and other predictions, are of the opinion that they will be returned to the land of Judah, now called Palestine, and that they will yet be empowered to rule over those who have been their oppressors, and all this to be accomplished through the carnal weapons of Esau ; but they need not flatter themselves with any such hope. The land of Israel is the doctrine preached by Christ and his Apostles. Land in this quotation is afij- urative term, borrowed from the idea of cultivating the earth for the support of the body, whereas this means a spiritual land, from which is to "be drawn cannons, rules, laws or precepts for the maintenance of a spiritual body, or man’s existence in society. And they shall rule over their oppressors. This sentence is not to be considered in a literal light; verse 7 at once decides that. The whole earth is at rest and is quiet; they break forth into singing. — Who would consider any people at rest when under the iron rod of oppression ? Happy slavery indeed is that which breaks forth into sing- ing. As an explanation upon the meaning of the prophet, see chap- ter XIX, 24, 2b. “In that day shall Israel be the third with Egypt and Assyria, even a blessing in the midst of the ’land whom the Lord of hosts shall bless, saving, -‘Blessed be Egypt, my people, and Assy- ria, the work of my handstand Israel, mine inheritance.’ ” This be- comes plain when we come to see that through Christ the inheritance •comes to Israel as he was out of the tribe of Judah ; therefore, by thi3 means, will thej r be made able to take them captive, whose captives they were; and through the doctrine -of our Lord Jesus Christ, they will rule over those who once oppressed them. THE MANNER IN WHICH THE FIRST CHURCH DEPARTED FROM THE TRUTH. Having noticed, in a limited manner, the -stripes of David’s mhr- muring ; obstinate Jewish children ; and also their final restoration, let us now take into consideration the stripes of the apostatizing, er- ring Christians, the relation which the. Jews and Christians now bear to Christ — one murmuring not, being suited in his manner of person and doctrine, and in the way he made his appearance.; the other re- ceiving him and then apostatizing from his holy word, which he cal- led the spirit, was distinctly foreseen by the prophet 'Isaiah, XXIX, 24. They also that erred in spirit shall come to understanding, and they that murmured shall learn doctrine. Before ad-verting to the visitation of God’s wrath ppoa the Church for disobeying his command, it will not be out of place, in order to strengthen what has been already quoted relating to the fall, to com- ment in part upon the XII and XIII chapters of Revelations, showing the manner of her slide from the truth, and then the-consequences that inevitably followed. In the 7th verse of the XU chapter we find the 'history of a war in heaven, “Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, and •the dragon fought, and his angels.” The subject of this war wasthe gospel -of Christ and the law of Moses — Christ and his first disciples being arrayed on one side, and the Jewish nation, led by the Pharisees, on the other. The order of attack on the part of the former was to do good for evil : if thy ene- -my hunger, feed him, &c., and to plant their whole art'llery. not up- iGX the bodies, but upon the spirits or hearts -of men. But the .order 10 of the latter vras to the reverse r if persuasion would not do, they di- rected their attacks upon the flesh, with a determination to force the opponent off of the field, or at once crush him out of existence. The dragon made a very early attempt, iu the person of Herod, to defeat the kingdom of Christ, by slaying all the children from two years old and under. It was the same dragon afterward that nailed him to the cross, and it was also the same dragon that stoned the martyr Stephen. Indeed every attempt to extinguish the truth, by acts of violence, is the works of a dragon spirit. The Catholics, and nearly all the Protestants, contend that they are justifiable to fight under particular considerations in the defence of their religion. I agree they have the right if the weapons of their warfare are not carnal but spiritual, to the pulling down of strongholds, i; 1 g, we find the Apostle rebuking his Gallatian 1 ,\ : er < ing of clays, together with other Jewish rites : but it < I hie nature of things that their observance was 1 f.bority of some binding precept made after the will of . - < inds. W. — You have labored to give the Sabbath day a : the shadows, and have attempted to give in Cl. .ap. r v lie Apostle Paul as your testimony. If in this you nr. C i has undergone a change o' company. It was or; - • the ] of the moral law, and with it proclaimed fro m AT innt a upon tables of stone, placed in what was called the Ai k C nt, and carried upon the shoulders of the Levites. — Your history is true, and v. hat you have related • - not to 1 ; ] nit it was nevertheless a shadow, and formed ore of th } parts of the Covenant. It had consolation for the ol a itbful, figuratively pointing to a day of rest for them i ] 1 Messiah. Heb. 4 chap., 3d, 4th verses. Col. is not the ] is found in company with the new moons. Seel h. !. c 4th and Cth verses. A shadow cannot exist as a law t ich it typified, has made its appearence. Gal. 3d :-hr _ . : . . . a. h verses. > Sabbath paragraph, in the 31st chap. Exodus, d. ; iocs it. s ity the design and nature of the Sabbath. This, howeve t : uage of the 16th and 17th verses : “Wherefore th :• childix .. 1 tall keep the Sabbath to observe the Sabbath thr: -._v.out ... g ions for a perpetual covenant. It is a sign between me i . t Iren of Israel forever, for in six days the Lord m ole Hr- . r . a chi and on the seventh day rested and was refreshed. - ' 1 h be seen that the Sabbath was not written as a law to b. s iy any of the Gentile nations, but it was peculiar only to th u.; f the Israelites. It was written to be observed by them • s . s. if the Covenant forever throughout their generations. Ti s f time indicated by the word forever and the phrase through- out their generations, must now be the enquiry. As a scriptural defi- nition cannot be objectionable, let the 15th. verse of the 40th chap, be read. (Same book). “And thou shaltanuoint them as thou didst annoint their father, that the}- may minister unto me in the priest’s of- fice : for their annointing shall surely be an everlasting priesthood throughout their generations.” Siuce the Levitical priesthood did terminate with the coming of Christ, and since the language used in relation to it was also used with respect to the Sabbath, must not therefore the law of the Sab- bath terminate at the same time. Heb. 7th chap., 12th verse, “For the priesthood being changed there is made of necessity a change also of the law.” The above quotations, together with the accompanying remarks, ma.y serve to explain the 2nd chap, of Mark, 27th verse, viz The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. “Matthew leaves upon record a history of the same facts ; 12th chap., 1, 8, only he handles the subject more in detail. It was an act of Sabbath breaking on the part of our Lord’s disciples, which introduced the conversation, as we find it upon record. After noticing the circum- stances of David and the Shew bread, He says in the 5th and 6th ver- ses, “or have ye not read in the law how that on the Sabbath days the priests in the Temple profane the Sabbath and are blameless. But I say unto you that in this place is one greater than the Temple.” Must this not be the inference : If the priest have the right because of their being in the temple to profane the Sabbath much more have these my disciples the right to profane it, as they are in me, for I am. great- er than the temple. By what laws of logic are we to find the right to take the langu- age of Christ, used by him in the defence of his Sabbath-breaking dis- ciples, and with it maintain the ordinance of Sabbath keeping. In the course of his remarks, when engaged in the act of acquitting his dis- ciples of crime, he declared, as recorded by Mark, That the son of rnan was Lord even of the Sabbath day. All the power and authority our Lord ascribed to himself, in this sentence, over the ordinance of the Sabbath, the same claim of authority he intended for his disciples, from the fact that it was an act of Sabbath-breaking charged against them, which gave rise to the whole discourse. Some must conclude, as they refer to this Scripture in support of Sabbath-keeping, that our Lord had reference to his power as a crea- tor ; but if they will take into consideration the root of his discourse, (Thy disciples do that which is not lawful for them to do on the Sab- bath day), they will perceive that it was an effort of him to convince the Pharisees that the Sabbth had no controlling authority over his disciples ; therefore, let the consideration be what it might with re- spect to his creative powers, the whole design was to show his ruling authority, and that this authority not only belonged to him over the Sabbath, but that his disciples were likewise clothed with the sam’e M power, since his whole conversation pointed to their defence. The 19th chap, of Matthew, 16th and 20th verses, must also be taken as proof against the Sabbath : “And behold one came and said unto him, Good roaster, what good thing shall I do that I may have eternal life ? And he said onto him, Why callestthou me good ? there i3 none good but one : that is God ; but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the com- mandments.” For some cause,- he desired to know which. Our Lord, then, in reply, pointed to the commands of the decalogue : “Thou shalt do no murder ; Thou- shalt commit no adultery ; Thou shalt not steal ; Thou shalt not bear false witness ; Honor thy father and thy mother ; Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thy self.” Is- it not strange, that iJ the Sabbath is a duty obligatory ’upon the Christian Church, that he failed to point it out as such to this man, since he professed to mark out for him the way to eternal Mfe. The Apostle Paul,- in his Letter to the Romans, 13th chap., 9th v., in quoting the decalogue, likewise fails to pay any attention to the Sabbath as one of the duties of the Church. His concluding language was as follows: if there be any other commandment- it is briefly comprehended in this saying, name- ly, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. Inasmuch as we find that the duties of the Church are to be weigh- ed in the scales of love between man and man, those preeepts taken from the decalogue by Christ and the Apostle, and engrafted into His spiritual kingdom, let us first throw into the scales. Where is the man that loves his neighbor as himself, that would take ki3 life (Thou shalt not kill) ; or if he loved him as himself, would commit adultery with his wife (Thou shalt not commit adultery) ; or if be loved him as himself, would he take his goods by theft (Thou shalt not steal) ; or if beloved him as he loved himself, would he testify falsely against him (Thou shalt not bear false witness) ; or if he loved his father and mother as he loved himself, would he fail to give them that honor due to them (Honor thy father and thy mother) ; or who is the man who loves his neighbor as himself, that would covet any thing which just- ly belongs to him (Thou shalt not covet). When we turn to the Sabbath day, what do we find ? Is there anything to be seen in the keeping of it resembling love between man and man. The man that keeps a Sabbath day does that which is neither an advantage nor a disadvantage to his neighbor, therefore the Apostles rule of love tor trying the acceptable commands of the decalogue, will not admit it a place in the kingdom of Christ. FAITH AND WORKS. In the following we propose to take into consideration what it takes to make living faith. In the meantime some of Paul’s episto- lary writings with respect to works will be explained. Not by any works of righteousness which we have done, but ac- m cording to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration and) renewing of the Holy Ghost. Upon these and a few other Scriptural quotations of a similar meaning, they seem to content themselves- that the heart must perform all the labors that are required to- ward God; leaving us, therefore, of course, to conclude that as the hands, feet, &c., are not to be honored for obedience to- the Saviour, they are at liberty to follow after the things of the- world. How un- reasonable is the doctrine ? It is not only un scriptural, but unnatu- ral, for it is evident that the body can perform nothing without first gaining over the consent of the heart unless forced or compelled. It is the office of the head to dictate to the heart, the heart to receive and to consent or deny, and the body to act perform as the two di- rects. The body then proves to be under the control ot the head and heart, and whatever it does we may take it for granted that the heart has first yielded its consent ; therefore, if the body refuses to comfort the widow, clothe the naked, and feed the hungry, the heart agrees. — - And for the same reason if the body is found to- be actively engaged in following up the commandments of Christ, we may be eertain that the heart is perfectly willing. It was for this cause that the Apostle James tells us tha “Faith without works is dead, being alone and re- fuses to the obedience of Abraham in the offer of his son as a proof of the fact ; for the Apostle knew that whenever the body failed to perform, if in its power to perform, that faith or encouragement in tho heart no longer existed. Having, however, proposed to take especially into consideration the works mentioned by Paul in some of his Epistles, we will make our commencement with the verse preceding the last quotation nam- ing works, which reads as follows : “For we ourselves also were some- times foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleas- ures, living in malice and envy, hatefoljand hating one another.” Now comes the words to which our opponents refer as proof that obedi- ence to the commandments of our Saviour alone is not sufficient to justify us before God. “But after that the kindness and love of God, our Saviour, toward man, appeared — not by any works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost.” The doc- trine contained in the verses quoted, the Apostle desired Titus |to teach, for which it seems that Paul had his fears that the people whom he expected Titus to instruct, might probably come to the con- clusion that the favor bestowed upon them by the crucifixion of the Saviour, was a debt which God naturally bestowed upon them in con- sequence of their superior virtues or good works, for he was careful to have them informed in regard to their ignorant and sinful state previous to the light of the Gospel, and that it was not any gooc^ works on their part previous to his crucifixion that merited his death and sufferings, for he elsewhere says, while we were yet sinners,Christ 26 died for us. Tbe illustration# just made may be taken as a commen- tary upon our other quotation, to-wit: “Not of works lest an}' man should boast,’* for it is plain the Apostle had the same subject under consideration; and it is further evident that if any sect or denomina- tion of people had by their good works merited the atonine mood of Christ, they could, with great propriety, have boasted. But in or- der that this should not be the case, he in both cases was particular to have them informed that the redemption ol the fallen race of Adam was a matter totally consisting of favor graciously bestowed upon them by the eternal God. This boasting spirit was discovered by John the Baptist in the hearts of the Pharisees that came to his bap- tism. For he said unto them, think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father, for I say unto you that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham. Paul, in the fourth chapter of Romans, expressed himself upon faith and works as follows : “What shall vre say then that Abraham our father as pertaining to the flesh hath found ; for if Abraham were justified by works lie hath whereof to glory, but not before God. For what saith the Scripture, Abraham believed God and i' was counted unto him for righteousness. Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace but of debt. But to him that w , but believeth him that justifieth the' ungodly, his faith i- 1 for righteournes3. Even as David also describeth the ‘ uess of this man unto whom God irnputeth righteousness with works, saying. Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, an.: ' ose sins are covered ; blessed is the mau to whom the Lord will u impute sin. Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also ; for wo say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness.” The Apostle, in the verses quoted, very plainly condemns works and lends his whole aid and support to faith. We will therefore at- tempt to make some enquiry after the meaning he intended to convey by the term works. It, however, could not have been the obedience of Abraham in the offer of his son, for to this the Apostle James re- ferred as the making of Abraham's faith, perfect - . See the general Epistle of James, 2d chap., 21st and 22d verses, “Was not Abraham, onr father, justified by works when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect.” From this it appears that James, when alluding to the works of Abraham, meant his three days travel to the mount, his preparation ot wood to consume the sacrifice, and finally ids obedience to God in the offer of his only son. But this could not have been the meaning of Paul, for it is certain that if Abraham had failed to have obeyed God in the offer of his son. the Apostle, in like manner must have failed to have boasted of his faith. For a failure pf obedience on the part of Abraham would evidently have proven 27 li'is want of iaith. Paul’s meaning, therefore, in regard to the works we have quoted in the 4th chap, of Romans, could not be obedience to the commaudraents of Christ, but his reference was to circumcision ; for the Apostle, after commenting upon works at some length, comes out in the 9th verse in such a manner as to clear it of all doubt that the works of circumcision was what he meant. Cometh this blessed ness, says he, then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircum- eidon also. For we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness. It is to be remembered that the Apostle, notwith- standing after having exchanged the term works for that of circnm- cision, continues his subject without any alteration as to substance, tli v. s proving that he was aiming at the same idea in both words. — Moreover, in the 5th verse we find him, when contending in opposi- tion to works, declaring that it was the faith of Abraham that was counted for righteousness ; whereas, in the 9th verse, to this same faith he refers as proof in opposition to circumcision, which makes it evident that yet in the 9th verse he had the same subject under con sideration. Therefore, from the whole, it becomes an undeniable fact that the word circumcision and works were synonymous terms in the mind of the Apostle. I n the 6th verse he calls attention to a prophecy of David in these wo: ds : Even as David also describes the blessedness of the man unto Go. i aputeth righteosness without works. The man here spoken ot was the Gentile people, who was endeavoring to be saved through faith in Christ, without having any connection ' with the Abrahamic circumcision or the ceremonial law of Moses. Our opponents tell us, taking, as they conceive, their authority from the 4th verse, that to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace but of debt, supposing the works spoken of by the Apostle to mean obedience to the commandments of Christ* they contend that it would be danger ous for a person to depend upon them for the safety or salvation of his soul ; from the fact, say they, that it would not be of' grace but ot debt. But these erroneous ideas would not be entertained for a mo- ment if they would first take into consideration the Apostolic day. and the religious character of the people wite whom the Apostle had to do. They should consider that many of the disciples under the care of Paul were Jews, newly converted from a faith or confidence in the law, tc a confidence or faith in the Lord Jesus Christ; and that they proved to be unwilling, even after they had; attached themselves to the Church, to part with the traditions of the Fathers. Hear the re- lation of the elders to the Apostle on his arrival at Jerusalem ; And when they heard it the}’ glorified the Lord and said unto him, Then seest brother how many thousands of Jews there are which believe, and they are all zealous of the law. And they are informed of thee that thou teaehest all the Jews which are amoug the Gentiles to for- 28 sake Moses, saying they ought not to eircumcise their children, neith- er walk after their customs. From what we can gather here, the disciples at Jerusalem were not only the professional followers of Christ, but also kept the law of Moses; especially circumcision. Such conduct being therefore at war with the doctrines of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. The Apostle used every exertion in his power to convince them that the law should be longer observed since the Messiah, the promised Sa- viour had truly come; telling them that he was the end of the law for religiousness to every one that believed. He moreover contended thafthe law was a schoolmaster, to bring them to Christ, but after Christ he said had come, they were no longer under a schoolmaster. He however, continued his argument as follows: (all of which may be found in his epistle to the Galatians,) “a child differeth nothing from a servant though he be Lord of all; but it is under tutors and governors until the time appointed of the father.” Now the tutors here named are of course the same which he a few verses back men- tioned as being a schoolmaster to bring us or the Jewish people to Christ ; for it was to that people only he was offering these arguments. Who then were these tutors and governors, must be the enquiry. — We without hesitation say that from every circumstance, the tutors most certainly were the prophets : for it was by these predictions as teaches that the promised Messiah was to be known. That is, they foresaw him to be a man of sorrow and acquainted with grief, so he was despised and rejected of men. So He was. He was to be wound- ed for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities. So he was. The chastisement of our peace was to be upon him. So it was. He was to be brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep be- fore his shearer. So He was. Upon his vesture were they to cast lots. So they did. And for thirty pieces of silver was He to be sold. So he was. These, however, are but a few of the predictions that were written by the prophets concerning Him, all of which were by them recorded, in order that those who had eyes to seee and ears to hear might know their great Redeemer when He made his appear- ance. We will secondly offer a short commentary upon the term gov- ernors, from the fact that it seems to have constituted a part of the schoolmaster that brought the Jews, at least the believing Jews, to Christ,. The a-oveniing or ruling parts of the law we give as the meaning of the Apostle in the use of this term, which consisted in burnt offerings, circumcision, &c., for the law not only called its vota- ries to circumcise their children, but they were also to offer the first- lings of their flocks as a manifestation of their love and faith towards God. These offerings, however, had other allusions : they also point- ed forward to the blood of the atonement, or to the great sacrifice that had yet to be made for the redemption of the fallen race of Adam. 29 Therefore they, together with the Prophets, most certainly made a complete schoolmaster to bring Israel to Christ. We are now ready more especially to consider the latter part of a quotation already taken from the 4th chapter of Paul’s Epistle to the Romans, viz : To him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace but of debt. The address of the Apostle was made 10 the beep- ers of the law of Moses, which law exacted a tax or debt from them. This debt, as is well known, had to be discharged in lambs, bullocks, &c., not for the family use of any person, but to be totally consumed upon their altars, satisfying the demands of the law. That the read- er, however, may be better informed in regard to the nature of this debt, it would be probably necessary to quote the sixth chapter of Ez- ra, 8th, 9th and 10th verses, “Moreover I make a decree what ye shall do to the elders of these Jews for the building of this house of God that the kings goods even of the tribute beyond the river, forthwith expenses be given unto these men that they be not hindered. And that which they had need of, both young bullocks and rams, and lambs for the burnt offerings of the God of heaven, wheat, salt, wine and oil, ace ording to the appointment of the priests which are at Je- rusalem, let it be given them day by day without fail ; that they may offer sacrifices of sweet savors unto the God of heaven, and pray for the king and his sons. We here discover a foreign prince lending his support in the pur- chase of animal sacrifices for the Jewish people, which probably would not have been done had they been able of themselves to have made the purchase; thus showing that the ceremonial part of Ihe law must have been to the Jews a considerable tax. It was for this cause that the Apostle Paul, in his Epistle to the Galations, encourages his Jew- ish brethren to stand fast to the liberty wherewith Christ has made them free, and be not, says he, again entangled with the yoke of bond- age. Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing. For I testify, says he again, to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. That is, he would have them to know, if they circumcised their children, prov- ing that they preferred the law to Christ, that they also obligated themselves to pay the debts or demands of the law, resorting to every reasonable argument to prove that Christ was the end of the law, and that he had come to redeem them from under its curse, being made, eays he, a curse for us. For this reason was the reward to him that worketh not, to be reckoned of grace butjof debt. Now mark the dif- ference when we come to the Gospel of our glorious redeemer, for we find all that he demanded of his disciples in the room of this grievious tax, was love to one another. Ah! but says one, might it not be cal- led a debt when it is expected that the richer brother will convey a part of his substance to supply the wants of his poorer brethren ? To such we would -say that it would if it can be made appear that the hand 30 has any right to make out a bill of expenses against the foot for the conveyance of ointment, &c.,to a wound inflicted, there. But such ■.» charge we hardly think reasonable, from the fact that the hand, bei.ny a member of the body, must be au equal sufferer with the foot, an. <- v s A ■ ? j- - . si : - ^ v e < 7 - , ? £ -€ <# t/ X ,-t /*Ir A ! A*0 &i_ CL-<2 xsLXXf^ vx- ^£_C ^ 6^ / ^> r jCs-7 ,1 v isx/y- <* < £ £2- i si & sJ -( sC -ft r .:/ '■ ' . x '/ / _ /yt t ss ^ i / A <. // t-" . sA-stA Uon< *-/ 9,. .... Ax. {ST V / ( s ^0L. £^*-C \ z5 A- V <-J /sl^O^SKA-s ' s) &- / _ yr\st v *S\/ ^ K. ?T_^-.y A Jt t T.X ^ XX . • / X 5 < .< 3 *. ^ ,-v/-- /i Asd J A* l yd ^ ~ . ., * - /X^f <$ l \ ft, SLoy-i. / / / JL ' i . ~v f e e y < J < /t o~ ^ / /7 V " ' /. ez■ < £ ' /,/„ f^/t* y\ *- . A 9 ^ ^ //£ JaZ- ff-14. Yi, & te ~- ’ ft, V ^ -tflA- A * , _. ■e*ri A ^ v c < 4 ? i tv < 7 * -y y/Yt* q v-, / ^O-TTL-A t.«ff'e.v /Z~- a* *■<''<**< m ^ c r (A/ ^ jr ^ ^ A V ^ ^^7 7 jh ^YolYaY < (? -■_ -7 / 4/ * A XsifdJt--' //JY 7 ^A<- -w«* A * t -L & m Kv' ' -< / 7 ^ 4 -&Y<\Ya> (f {*- '/Ar*a i er, and where you know it. will be found. Do not despise theday of small things: is there not a cause? We have passed through a disastrous four years war, and if reports be true, some 700,000 or i-00,000 of our fellow men have fallen as victims to its destructive rage. I ask, Where lies the fault? Sir, I think if you will make an investigation, you Will find the cause winding its way up to the pulpit. Our Lord in his sermon on the Mount, notifies us to beware of false prophets, and lays down a solemn truth that if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch. He. however, leaves us a manifest token of his fatherly care by bringing to our notice a telling sign by their fruits, ye shall know them. Sir, both Catholic and Protes- tant have departed from the faith’once delivered to the saints. We are not justified even to lollow them through the baptismal ordinance. God makes a choice, rather to take for act of performance, a willing heart than a violation of his commands, as quoted above. In conclusion, I will say that I belong to no church or sect, nor ever did, my only motive is to bring to the light a hypocritical priesthood. DR. NEWTON ON it ES UR RECTI ON. The New York Episcopal Divine Advances Some Striking Theories. New York, May 6. — In the Church of All Souls yesterday the Rev. Dr. Heber New- ton delivered the third of his series of ser- mons on the resurrection of Jesus. During the course of his sermon he said: "If we read the story of the resurrection of Jesus Christ we shall see in it a type of every other resurrection that is -to. follow. The life to come cannot be a bodiless existence. Nature knows no bodiless existence; every- thing that lives clothes itself in some form or other. There is more or less fine matter composing these forms, but matter of some sort or other there is clothing everything living. We may be sure that the dead, liv- ing still, live not merely in some disem- bodied existence — they have bodies of their own though our eyes may not ordinarily see them. That is clear in the story of the risen Jesus. The body that shall be will not be some wholly new body, else the continuity of rife will be broken. It is an absolute necessity that in the life beyond personal identity shall continue. -That means that in some way cr other there shall be a continuance of that which is truly vital and essential in our present ex- istence. There is within us each a spirit- ual body. The mysteries of clairvoyance or mind reading— these and other well authen- ticatefi powers of men are not powers of outer powers, . but powers of some inner organization transformed by the mind. This again we see illumined in the storie.s of the risen Jesus. At the touch of death the outer fleshly body falls away and the en- tire spiritual body is freed for a new life. It may draw around itself, from the body which it leaves, or from the spiritual ele- ments in the encompassing ether the ele- ments of a new and finer material body, or in ways in which we cannot even dream of, the mystery of being ‘clothed upon’ may accomplish itself. At the moment of death it seems to me the spirit passes out of its earthly house into the ‘house 'not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.’ Every death is a resurrection. From every sepul- cher the stone is already rolled away. This again I think we see in the stories of the risen Jesus.”