//- CORRESPONDENCE BKTWEI5N Till tf[ommififjionenj of the ^t\U of ^o. Oliu (iOVKUXMKXT AT \VASI11X(;T()X THK IMIKSIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES; TOiSKTIfKR WtTM THK STATEMENT OF MESSRS. MILES AND KEITT. PRINTKI> IIY onHKR <»K THE «ON VKNTION. r II \ |{ \, HSTOX: KVANM k COOrtWKM., rRINTERJ* TO THK rOX VKNTIOJI, No. ;; Ilriiwl und m.T F4»»t Bay Ctiw-t. :2^ TREASimi ^CX)M George JVashitigton Flowers Memorial Collection DUKF. UNIVF.RSITY I.IHRARV ESTABLISHF.D BV THE rAMII.V or COLONEL K LOWERS ^ C0RRESP0NT3ENCE BETWEEN THE OtommiTifiiontrf) nf the ^tak 4 ^o. Ola. GOVERNMENT AT AVASIIINGTON THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES; TOGETUEU WITH THE STATEMENT OF MESSRS. MILES AND KEITT. riUNTED BY ORDER OF THE CONVENTION. (']1 .\ JILKSTON: KVANH k COGSWELL, PRINTERS TO THE CONVENTION, No. 3 BniaJ antl 103 Ea«t Bay i^trcit. 1861. • #) [lkttkr ok thk commissioners to the puesidicnt.] Washington, 28tli December, 1860. Sir: We have the honor to transmit to you a copy of tlie full powers from the Convention of the People of South Carolina, under which wc are "authorized and empowered to treat with the Government of the United States for tlu- delivery of the forts, magazines, light houses and other real estate, with their ap]turtenances, within the limits of South Carolina, and also for an apportionment of the pub- lic debt and for a division of all other property- lield hy the Government of the United States as agent of the confed- erated States, of which South Carolina was recently a member; and generally to negotiate as to all other meas- ures and arrangements proper to be made and adopted in the existing relation of the parties, and for the continuance of peace and amity between this connnonwealth and the Government at Washington." In the execution of this trust, it is our duty to furnish you, a.s Ave now^ do, with an official copy of the Ordinance of Secession, by which the State of South Carolina has resumed the powers she delegated to tlie Governmei\t/of the United States and has declared her perfect sovereignty and independence. It woidd also have been our duty to have ijijfoniied ^yon that we were ready to negotiate with you upon all such questions a,s are necessarily raised by the adoption of tlii'^ "rdinance, and that we were jirepared to enter upon ihi- negotiatifMi with the earnest desire to avoid all unnecessary and hostile collision, and so to inaugurate our new relations as to secure mutual respect, general advantage and a futun ■f good will and harmony beneficial to all the parties • oncerned. Hut tlio events of the la^i twenty-four liours render sueh im assurance impossible. We came liere tlie representa- tivcH of an authority wliich could, at any time within tlie |»jus from the harbor of Charles- ton. Under present circumstances, they are a standing njenace which renders negotiation impossible, and, as our recent experience shews, tlneatens speedily to bring to a bloody issue questions w liieli ought to be settled with tcm- j't-rance and judgment. We have the honor. Sir, to be, \'ery respectfully, Your obedient servants, ]{. W. r.AKXWKLL. J. 11. ADAMS. JAMES L. ORU, Cvmniissiontn's. ^7\j'(h l''liiiMm:NT of the United Sluh's. [RF.rr,Y OF TUF, PRKSIDKNT TO THE COMMISSIOXKUS.] Wasiiincjton C[ty, 30t.h December, 1800. Gentlemen : I liavc the lienor to receive your commnni- catioii of 28th inst., together with a copy of your "full powers from the Convention of the People of Honth Caro- lina," authorising you to treat with the Government of the United States on various important subjects therein men- tioned, and also a copy of the Ordinance bearing date on the 20th instant, declaring that "the Union nowsubsisting between South Caroliiia and other States under the name of 'the United St.ites of America,' is hereby dissolved." In answer to this communication, I have to say, that my position as President of the United States was clearly defined in the message to Congress of the 3d instant. In that t stated that, "apart from the execution of the laws, so far as this may l>e practicable, the Executive has n<> authority to decide what shall be the relations between the Federal Government and South Carolina. He has been invested with no such discretion. lie possesses no power to change the relations heretofore existing between them, much less to acknowledge the independence of that State. This would be to invest a mere executive officer with the power of recognizing the dissolution of the Con- federacy among our thirty-three sovereign States. It bears no resemblance to the recognition of a foreign dr facto government — involving no suresentatives of an authority which could, at any time, within the past sixty days have taken j^ossession of the forts in Charleston har- bor, but wliieh, upon ])ledgcs given in a manner that we lyou) cannot doubt, determined to trust to your (my) honor rather than to its own jiower." This brings me to a eonsideration of the nature of those alleged pledges, and in what manner they have been ob- served. In my message of tlie third of December last. I stated, in regard to the property of the United States in South Carolina, that it "has been purchased for a fair equivalent "by the eons\.iit of the Legislature of the State,' • for the ereetion of forts, magazines, arsenals,' &c., and over these the authority ' to exercise exclusive legislation* has been exjiressly granted by the Constitution to Congress. It is not believed that any attempt will be made to expel the United States from this prt>i>erty by force; but if in this I should prove to be mistaken, the otHcer in command of the forts has reeeived orders to act strictly ledge. liut I acted in the same manner I would have done hud I entered into a positive and formal agreement with parties capable of contracting, although such an agreement woidd have been, on myjiart, from the nature of my ofHcial duties, impossible. The world knows that I have never sent any reinforce- ments to tlje forts in Charleston harbor, and I have cer- tainly never authorized any change to be made " in their relative military status." Hearing upon this subject, I refer you to an oider issued by the Secretary of War, on the 11th inst., to^Iajor Ander- son, but not brought to my notice until the 21st instant. It is as follows : " Memorandum of verbal iii.structions to Major Anderson, \st Artillery^ Commamlhif) Fori Moultrie, S. C. You are aware of the great anxiety of the Secretary of War that a collision of the troops with the people of this State shall be avoided, and of his studied determination to pursue a course with reference to the military force and forts in this harbor, ■which shall guard against such a col- lision. He has, therefore, carefully abstained from increas- ing the force at this point, or taking any measures which might add to the present excited state of the public mind, or which would throw any doubt on the coniidence he feels that South Carolina Avill not attem])t by violence to obtain [•osscssion of the public works, or interfere with their occu- pancy. But as tlie counsel and acts of rash and impulsive persons may possibly disappoint these expectations of the Government, he deems it ^troper that you should be pre- ])ared with instnictions to meet so unhappy a contingency. He has, therefore, directed me, verbally, to give you such instructions. You are carefully to avoid every act which would need- lessly tend to provoke aggression ; and, for that reason, you are not, without evident and imminent necessity, to take up any position which could be construed into the assump- tion of a hostile attitude ; but you are to hold possession of the forts in this harl>or, and, if attacked, you are to defend yourself to the last extremity. The smallness of your force will not permit you, perhajts, to occupy more than one of the three forts; but an attack on, or attempt to take possession of either of them, will be regarded as an act of hostility, and you may then put your command into either of them which you may deem most proper, to increase its ])ower of resistance. You are also authorized to take simi- lar defensive steps whenever you have tangible evidence of a design to proceed to a hostile act. 1). r. IMJTLYAl, Assif^tani Adjutani General. Fort Moultrtk, S. C, Dec. 11, 1860." This is in contorniity to my instructions to Major Buell. JOHN B^'LOYD, .Secretory of War. 10 These were the last iiistructions traiiPmitted to Major Andereiin licfore his removal to Fort Sumter, with a single «x< it had ever been made in any communication between myself and any human being. But the inference is, that I am bound to witlidraw the troops from the only fort remaining in the possession of the United States in the harbor of Charleston, because the officer then in command of all the foiis thought proper, without instruc- tions, to change his position from one of them to another. I cannot admit the justice of any such inference. At tliis point of writing, I have received information, by telegram, from Ca[»tain Humphreys, in command of the Arsenal at Charleston, "that it has to-day (Sunday, the 80th) lieen taken l>y force of arms." It is estimated that the munitions of war l)elonging to the United States in thi-^ Arsenal are worth half a million of dollars. Comment is needless. After this information, I have only to add, that, whilst it is nn- duty to defend Fort Sumter, as a portion of the public jiroperty of the United States against hostile attacks from whatever quarter they may come, by such means as I may possess for this pur- pose, I do not [KTceive how such a defence can be con- strued into a menace against the City of Charleston. With great personal regard, I remain Yours, very respectfully, JAMES BUCHANAN. To Jlonorohff KoBERT W. Barnwell, James H. Adams, James L. Orr. 12 [bKPLY of THK COMMIS8IOXKU8 TO TIIK mtUilDKXT.] \\'ASIIINiiT«tN, D. C\, January 1st, 1861. Sir: Wo have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of vour letter of the 80th Doceiiiber, in ro\\\y to a note ad- dressed by us to you on the 2^th of the srinif month, as Commissioners from South Carolina. In reference to the declaration with whicli your reply commences, that "your position as President of the United States was clearly defined in the Messas^o to Cons^ress of tlie 3d instant," that you possess "no power to change the relations heretofore existinir" between South Carolina and the Tnited States, " much less to acknowledge the inde- pendence of that State;" and that, consequently, you could meet us only as private gentlemen of the highest character, with an entire willingness to communicate to Congress any jti'oposition we might have to make, we deem it only necessary to say, that the State of South Carolina having, in the exercise of that great right of self-government which underlies all our political organizations, declared herself sovereign and inde|iendent, we, as her representatives, felt no special solicitude as to the character in which you might recognize us. Satisfied that the State had simply exercised her unquestionable right, we were i)repared. in order to reach substantial good, to waive the formal con- siderations which your const it utiomil scrui>les might have prevented you from extciiding. We came here, llicicfore, expi'cting to be received as you did rcci'ive us, and per- fectly content with that entire willingness of which yoti assured us, to submit any iiroposition to Congress which we might have to make ujton the subject of the independ- ence of the State. That willingness was ample recognition of the condition of public afi'airs which rendered our pros- 13 dice necessary. In this position, however, it is our duty, huth to the State wliich we represent and to ourselves, to correct several important misconceptions of our letter into which you have fallen. You say, ''It was my earnest desire that such a diisposi- tion might he made of \hv w]u»le suhject hy Congress, who alone possesses the poAvcr to prevent the inauguration of a civil war hetween the parties in regard to the possession of the federal forts in the harbor of Charleston; and I, therefore, deeply regret that, in your opinion, 'the events of the last twenty-four hours render this impossible,' " Wo expressed no such opinion, and the language which you quote as ours, is altered in its sense hy the omission of a most important part of the sentence. What we did say was: "But tlie events of the last twenty-four hours render such an a5.SMra?ice impossible." Place tliat "assurance" as contained in our letter, in the sentence, and we arc prepared to repeat it. Again, professing to quote our language, you say : — "Thus the authorities of South Carolina, without waiting or asking for anj* explanation, and, doubtless, believing, as you have expressed it, that the officer had acted not only without, but against my orders," &c. AVe expressed no such opinion in reference to the belief of the people of South Carolina. The language which you have quoted, was applied solel\- and entirely to our assuraufc, obtained here, and based, as you well know, upon your own declara- tion — a declaration which, at that time, it was impossible for the authorities of South Carolina to have known. But, without following this letter into all its details, we propose only to meet the chief points of the argument. Some weeks ago, tlie State of South Carolina declared her intention, in the existing condition of [tublic affairs, to secede from the United Stiites. vShe called a Convention of her people, to put her declaration in force. The Con- vention met, and jiassed the Ordinance of Secession. All this you anticipated, and your course of action was thor- oughly considered. In your annual mcsnafc. y«tu declared 14 you had no rip:lit. ami would not attempt, to eocive a seced- inj: Stato, l»ut that yon wi-re hound hy your constitutional oath, and would dofc-nd the jiroporty of the I'nit* d States within the l>ordcrrt of J^outh Carolina, if an attempt was made to take it hy foree. Socinp: very early that this (jues- tion of pixjjierty was a difficult and delicate one, you nunii- feHtod a desire to settle it without collision* You did not reinfort'C the pirrisons in the harbor of Charleston. You removed a distiniruished and veteran officer from the com- mand of Fort Moultiie. l>ccause he attempted to increase hii* Pnpply of ammunition, ^'ou refused to send additional tro<»ps to the same pirrison when ajiplied for by the officer appointed to succeed him. You accepted the resii^nation of the oldest and* most eminent lueinher of your Cabinet, rather tlian allow these garrisons to he streiiiifthcned. You compelled an officer stationed at Fort Sumter, to return immediatel}' to the Arsenal, forty muskets which he had taken tressed not to one, but to many, of the most distiniruished of our public characters, whose testimony will be placed upon the record, whenever it is necessary, your anxiety for a peaceful termination of this controvei-sy, and your willinijness n<»t to disturb the military status of the forts, if Commissioners should bo sent to the (fovernmen4, whose coniiiiiiniostponed our meeting until half- past two o'clock, on Friday, in order that you might con- sult your Cabinet. On Friday we saw you. and we called upon you thon to redeem your pledge, ^'ou could not deny it. With the facts we have stated, and in the face of the crowning and conclusive fact, that your Secretary of AVarhad resigned his seat in the Cabinet, upon the publicly avowed ground that the action of Major Anderson had violated the pledged faith of the Government, and that un- less the pledge was instantly redeemed, he was dishonored; denial was impossible; you did not deny it. You do not deny it now, but you seek to escape from its obligation on two grounds: 1st, That irr terminated all negotiation by demanding, as a jirt'liniinarv. the withdrawal of the United States trodps from the harbor of Charlestrtn ; and 2d, Tliat the authorities of South Carolina, instead of asking expla- nation, and giving you the oppfirtunity to virdieate your- s«df, took possession of other ]^r<»]'eri\- <^«f tb<' Fi.it.-d States, \Kq will examine both. In the first place, we deny jKWtivcly, that we have ever, in any way, made any such demand. Our lettor is in your posse.s9ion ; it will stand by this on the record. In it, wc IG iufunn you of the objccte of our mission. Wc say that it would l);i . ' our dutv to have assured you of our read- iiu >s to . f negotiations willi the most earnest and aiixiuuK desire to settle all questions between us amiiahly, and t<» our mutual advantage, hut that events had rondc red thai UASuraneo imitossihle. We statrd the events, and we 8aid that, until some satisfactory exjdanation of these events was given us, we eouhl not proceed, and then, hav- ing made this request for explanation, we added, "and, in conclusion, we would urge upon you the immediate with- drawal of the troops from the harbor of Charleston. Under present circumstances they are a standing menace, which renders negotiation injpossible," &.c. "Under jiresent cir- cumstances !" tWhat circumstances? Why, clearly, the occupati»)n of Fort Sumter, and the dismantling of Fort Moultrie by Major Anderson, in the face of your jdedges, and without explanation or practical disavowal. And there is nothing in the letter, whieli would or C(»uld have }MVvent- ed you from declining to withdraw the troops, and oifering the restoration of the stiitus to which you were pledged, if such had been your desire. It would have l)een wiser and better, in our opinion, to have withdrawn the troojjs, and this opinion we urged upon you, but we iTcmanded nothing but such an explanation of the events of the last twenty- four hours as would restore our contidence in the spirit with which the negotiation should be conducted. In rela^ tii>n to this withdrawal of the troops from the harbor, we are compelled, however, tu notice oue passage of your let- ter. Referring to it, you say : "This 1 cannot do. This 1 will not di». Such an idea was never thought of by nie in any possiMe contingency. .\o allMsi(»n to it had ever been njaula- tion, not to make any change in the fort«, or to send rein- forcements to them, uidesa they were attacked, we of the delegation who were elected to the Convention, felt equally bound in honor to do everything on our part to ]»revent any ]>remature collision. This Convention can bear us witness as to whether or not we endeavored honorably to carry out our share of the agreement. The published debates at the very commencement of the session, contain the evidence of our good faith. We trusts ed the PresidtMit. We believed his wishes concurred with his polic}', and that both were directed to avoiding any inauguration of hostilities. We were confirmed in our confidence, and reassured in our belief by a significant event which t(tok place subsequent to our interview. lie alh)wed his premier Cabinet officer, an old and tried friend^ to resign, rather than yield to his solicitations for tlie rein- forcement of the garrison at Charleston. We urged this as a convincing proof of bis firmness and sincerity. But how have avc been deceived I The news of Major An