Derby Technical College. THE WILLIAM R. PERKINS LIBRARY OF DUKE UNIVERSITY Rare Books Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/ofqueensgardensOOrusk OF QUEENS' GARDENS. BY JOHN RUSKIN t -BE THOU GLAD, OH THIRSTING DESERT j LET THE DESERT BE MADE CHEERFUL, AND BLOOM AS THE LILY > AND THE BAR- REN PLACES OF JORDAN SHALL RUN WILD WITH WOOD.'-ISAIAH XXXV. 1 (SEPTUAGINT) V OF QUEENS^GARDENS fT will, perhaps, be well, as this Lec^j ture is the sequeh of one previously given, that I should shortly state to youj my general inten* ition in both. The questions specially j proposed to you in^ f the first, namely, How and What to Read, rose out of a far deeper one, which it was myl ^endeavour to make you propose earnestly to yourselves, namely, WHY to Read* I want you to feel, with me, that whatever advan* tages we possess in the present day in thel ►diffusion of education and of literature, can* only be rightly used by any of us when we ►have apprehended clearly what education is' to lead to, and literature to teach. I wish youl to see that both well-directed moral training' land well'chosen reading lead to the posses* Ision of a power over the ilkguided and illiter* |)|/ ate, which is, according to the measure of it,! in the truest sense, KINGLY; conferring in< ^/deed the purest kingship that can exist amongi m men: too many other kingships (however \mr/Vfi\]]i distinguished by visible insignia or material Wmj Will power) being either spectral, or tyrannous ; — \vt/^ spectral — that is to say, aspects and shadowsf^C^ only of royalty, hollow as death, and which only the "likeness of a kingly crown have on " : or else — tyrannous — that is to say, sub- stituting their own will for the law of justice and love by which all true kings rule* HERE is, then, I repeat — and as I want to leave this idea with you, I begin with it, and/ shall end with it — only one' pure kind of kingship; an inevitable and eternal kind,^ crowned or not ; the kingship, namely, which [consists in a stronger moral state, and a truer thoughtful state, than that of others ; enabling you, therefore, to guide, or to raise them. Observe that word 44 State "; we have got k into a loose way of using it. It means liter (ally the standing and stability of a thing ; and you have the full force of it in the derived word " statue " — 44 the immovable thing." A king's majesty or 44 state," then, and the right 'of his kingdom to be called a state, depends on the movelessness of both : — without tre^ .mor, without quiver of balance; established^ m MM and enthroned upon a foundation of eternal | law which nothing can alter, nor overthrow, ELIEVING that all literature and all education are only use^j ful so far as they tend to con* firm this calm, beneficent, and THEREFORE kingly, power, — first, over ourselves, and, through ourselves, over all around us, — I ami now going to ask you to consider with me far* ther, what special portion or kind of this royaL authority, arising out of noble education, may, rightly be possessed by women ; and how far they also are called to a true queenly power ,( not in their households merely, but over all within their sphere. And in what sense, if they rightly understood & exercised this royal] or gracious influence, the order and beauty in* duced by such benignant power would justify^ us in speaking of the territories over which ach of them reigned, as " Queens' Gardens/ ND here, in the very outset, wel are met by a far deeper question/ which — strange though this may seem — remains among] many of us yet quite undeci* ded in spite of its infinite im> portance. €EWe cannot determine what thei m m I queenly power of women should be, until we I are agreed what their ordinary power should be. We cannot consider how education may fit them for any widely extending duty, until l^sg: we are agreed what is their true constant v-S^ duty. And there never was a time when wilder words were spoken, or more vain imagina^ tion permitted, respecting this question — quite 'vital to all social happiness. The relations of the womanly to the manly nature, their ^different capacities of intellect or of virtue, seem never to have been yet estimated with entire consent. We hear of the "mission" •and of the 44 rights " of Woman, as if these could ever be separate from the mission and the rights of Man — as if she and her lord were [creatures of independent kind, and of irrecon* cilable claim. This, at least, is wrong. And 'not less wrong — perhaps even more foolishly wrong (for I will anticipate thus far what I k hope to prove) — is the idea that woman is 'only the shadow and attendant image of her JjjjjfrXt. lord, owing him a thoughtless and scrv ^ e /^Pffj >obedience, and supported altogether in her™ weakness by the pre-eminence of his forti' ftude. fCThis, I say, is the most foolish of all errors respecting her who was made to be ihe helpmate of man. As if he could be helped m effectively by a shadow, or worthily by a slave ! j ET us try, then, whether we cannot get at some clear and harmonious idea (it must bel harmonious if it is true) oft what womanly mind and virtue are in power and office, with respect to man's; and how their relations, rightly accepted, aid and increase the vigour! and honour and authority of both. €EAnd now I must repeat one thing I said in the/ last lecture : namely, that the first use of edu* cation was to enable us to consult with the wisest and the greatest men on all points oii earnest difficulty. That to use books rightly, was to go to them for help : to appeal to them, when our own knowledge & power of thought j failed : to be led by them into wider sight,- purer conception, — than our own, and receive 1 from them the united sentence of the judges and councils of all time, against our solitary ( and unstable opinion. €C Let us do this now. Let us see whether the greatest, the wisest,' the purest'hearted of all ages are agreed in any wise on this point : let us hear the tes* timony they have left respecting what theyi held to be the true dignity of woman, and ^her mode of help to man. iND first let us take Shake* speare* €E Note broadly in the outset, Shakespeare has no heroes ; — he has only heroines* There is not one entirely heroic figure in all his plays, except the slight sketch of Henry the Fifth, exag* gerated for the purposes of the stage ; and the 'still slighter Valentine in The Two Gentle* men of Verona* In his laboured and perfect .plays you have no hero* Othello would have been one, if his simplicity had not been so great as to leave him the prey of every base ^practice round him ; but he is the only ex* ample even approximating to the heroic type* Coriolanus — Caesar — Antony stand in flawed [Strength, and fall by their vanities ; — Hamlet is indolent, and drowsily speculative ; Romeo an impatient boy; the Merchant of Venice languidly submissive to adverse fortune; 'Kent, in King Lear, is entirely noble at heart, 'but too rough & unpolished to be of true use at the critical time, and he sinks into the office of a servant only* Orlando, no less noble, is yet the despairing toy of chance, followed, 'comforted, saved by Rosalind. Whereas there is hardly a play that has not a perfect i woman steadfast errorless purpose : Cordelia, Desdemona, Isa* bella, Hermione, Imogen, Queen Catherine^ Perdita, Sylvia, Viola, Rosalind, Helena, and last, and perhaps loveliest, Virgilia, are alii ^faultless; conceived in the highest heroic^ type of humanity. HEN observe, secondly, fEThej catastrophe of every play is caused always by the folly or| fault of a man ; the redemption, if there be any, is by the wis* dom and virtue of a woman,, and, failing that, there is none. The catas* trophe of King Lear is owing to his own( iwant of judgment, his impatient vanity, his misunderstanding of his children ; the virtue of his one true daughter would have saved! 'him from all the injuries of the others, unless! ,he had cast her away from him ; as it is, she! all but saves him. €E Of Othello I need not rtrace the tale ; — nor the one weakness of his' so mighty love; nor the inferiority of his! perceptive intellect to that even of the second 1 nwoman character in the play, the Emilia who, [dies in wild testimony against his error : — II/ " Oh, murderous coxcomb ! what should such a fool Do with so good a wife ? 99 |€E In Romeo and Juliet , the wise and brave stratagem of the wife is brought to ruinous issue by the reckless impatience of her hus^ |band. In Winter's Tale, and in Cymbeline, >the happiness and existence of two princely households, lost through long years, and imperilled to the death by the folly and obsti* Inacy of the husbands, are redeemed at last 'by the queenly patience and wisdom of the wives* In Measure for Measure, the foul hv justice of the judge, and the foul cowardice ,of the brother, are opposed to the victorious truth and adamantine purity of a woman. In loriolanus, the mother's counsel, acted upon in time, would have saved her son from all evil ; his momentary forgetfulness of it is his iruin ; her prayer, at last granted, saves him -not, indeed, from death, but from the curse W living as the destroyer of his country. fEAnd what shall I say of Julia, constant against the fickleness of a lover who is a (mere wicked child ? — of Helena, against the petulance and insult of a careless youth ? — of the patience of Hero, the passion of Beatrice, and the calmly devoted wisdom of the "un^ 'lessoned girl/' who appears among the help< lessness, the blindness, and the vindictive passions of men, as a gentle angel, bringing courage and safety by her presence, and de< f eating the worst malignities of crime by what women are fancied most to fail in, — precision r^^/and accuracy of thought ♦ further, among aft the principal figures in Shaken speare's plays, there is onlyi one weak woman — Ophelia; and it is because she fails' Hamlet at the critical moment, and is not, and cannot in her nature be,( a guide to him when he needs her most,j that all the bitter catastrophe follows* Fin* ally, though there are three wicked women' among the principal figures — Lady Macbeth, Regan, and Goneril — they are felt at once to be frightful exceptions to the ordinary laws] of life; fatal in their influence also, in pro* portion to the power for good which they^ have abandoned. €E Such, in broad light, is { Shakespeare's testimony to the position and, character of women in human life. He re^; presents them as infallibly faithful and wise counsellors, — incorruptibly just and pure, examples — strong always to sanctify, even| |/when they cannot save. OT as in any wise comparable in knowledge of the nature of vu man, — still less in his under^\Wy* standing of the causes and(p^f^ courses of fate, — but only as^^ the writer who has given us the broadest view of the conditions and modes | of ordinary thought in modern society, I ask you next to receive the witness of Walter Scott €E I put aside his merely romantic prose (Writings as of no value, and though the early romantic poetry is very beautiful, its testis mony is of no weight, other than that of a ►boy's ideal. But his true works, studied from Scottish life, bear a true witness ; and in the whole range of these, there are but three men who reach the heroic type, See Appendix, Note A. J* — Dandie Dinmont, Rob Roy, and Claverhouse; of these, one is a border farmer; another a freebooter; the third a soldier in a bad cause. And these touch the 'ideal of heroism only in their courage and faith, together with a strong, but uncultivated, ll/ffifik or mistakenly applied, intellectual power; while his younger men are the gentlemanly [playthings of fantastic fortune, and only by aid (or accident) of that fortune, survive, not vanquish, the trials they involuntarily sustain. Of any disciplined, or consistent character,! » earnest in a purpose wisely conceived, or *\sxy<* dealing with forms of hostile evil, definitely T^j^challenged anc * resolutely subdued, there isj no trace in his conceptions of young men^ a * k young Whereas in his imaginations of women, — in the characters of Ellen Douglas, of Flora Maclvor, Rose Bradwardine, Catherine Sey- ton, Diana Vernon, Lilias Redgauntlet, Alice! Bridgenorth, Alice Lee, and Jeanie Deans,- with endless varieties of grace, tenderness, andj ^Vyi,jintellectual power, we find in all a quite in^ i ^^^rfallible sense of dignity and justice ; a fearless, instant, and untiring self-sacrifice, to even thd appearance of duty, much more to its real claims; and, finally, a patient wisdom of deeply^restrained affection, which does in- finitely more than protect its objects from a| momentary error; it gradually forms, ani- mates, and exalts the characters of the un- worthy lovers, until, at the close of the tale/ we are just able, and no more, to take patience! in hearing of their unmerited success. 9L So that, in all cases, with Scott as with Shake- speare, it is the woman who watches over,j M teaches, and guides the youth; it is never,] Lby any chance, the youth who watches over, 0or educates, his mistress. EXT take,though more briefly, graver testimony — that of the great Italians and Greeks* You know well the plan of Dante's l^^Ss great poem — that it is a love^^ poem to his dead lady ; a song [of praise for her watch over his soul. Stoop* ing only to pity, never to love, she yet saves him from destruction — saves him from hell* He is going eternally astray in despair ; she (comes down from heaven to his help, and ^throughout the ascents of Paradise is hisi teacher, interpreting for him the most diffi^ 'cult truths, divine and human ; and leading him, with rebuke upon rebuke, from star to^ star* €E I do not insist upon Dante's concept ition; if I began I could not cease: besides,! you might think this a wild imagination of one poet's heart. So I will rather read to< you a few verses of the deliberate writing of a knight of Pisa to his living lady, wholly [characteristic of the feeling of all the noblest rm men of the thirteenth, or early fourteenth, Un^^ century, preserved among many other suchi records of knightly honour and love, which! 'Dante Rossetti has gathered for us from among the early Italian poets. \3&- \9&- 3& 44 For lo ! thy law is passed That this my love should manifestly be To serve and honour thee : And so I do ; and my delight is full, Accepted for the servant of thy rule* Without almost, I am all rapturous, Since thus my will was set To serve, thou flower of joy, thine excel* lence : Nor ever seems it anything could rouse A pain or a regret* But on thee dwells my every thought and 1 sense ; Considering that from thee all virtues spread , As from a fountain head, — THAT IN THY GIFT IS WISDOM'S BEST AVAIL AND HONOUR WITHOUT FAIL,i With whom each sovereign good dwells | separate, Fulfilling the perfection of thy state* " Lady, since I conceived Thy pleasurable aspect in my heart, MY LIFE HAS BEEN APART IN SHINING BRIGHTNESS AND THE PLACE OF TRUTH ; Which till that time, good sooth, Groped among shadows in a darkened place, Where many hours and days It hardly ever had remembered good* But now my servitude Is thine, and I am full of joy and rest A man from a wild beast Thou madest me, since for thy love I lived/' [OU may think perhaps a Greek knight would have had a lower estimate of women than this Christian lover. His spiritual subjection to them was indeed i not so absolute ; but as regards ^their own personal character, it was only be* cause you could not have followed me so ^easily, that I did not take the Greek women instead of Shakespeare's; and instance, fori chief ideal types of human beauty and faith, j [the simple mother's and wife's heart of Andro* mache; the divine, yet rejected wisdom of 1 Cassandra; the playful kindness and simple" princesS'life of happy Nausicaa; the house* wifely calm of that of Penelope, with its watch 1 'upon the sea ; the ever patient, fearless, hope' /M lessly devoted piety of the sister, and daughter, Ijfj^^ in Antigone; the bowing down of Iphigenia,f ' lamb4ike and silent ; and finally, the expecta^l ftion of the resurrection, made clear to the soul of the Greeks in the return from her grave of. [that Alcestis, who, to save her husband, hadl^ 8p passed calmly through the bitterness of death, OW I could multiply witness 1 upon witness of this kind upon you if I had time, I wouldj take Chaucer, and show you< why he wrote a Legend of Good Women ; but no Legend of Good Men* I would take Spenser, and] show you how all his fairy knights are some* times deceived and sometimes vanquished ; but the soul of Una is never darkened, and< the spear of Britomart is never broken. Nay, I could go back into the mythical teaching oJ the most ancient times, and show you howl the great people, — by one of whose princesses it was appointed that the Lawgiver of all the earth should be educated, rather than byj his own kindred ; — how that great Egyptian people, wisest then of nations, gave to their Spirit of Wisdom the form of a Woman ; and into her hand, for a symbol, the weaver's' shuttle ; and how the name and the form of! that spirit, adopted, believed, and obeyed by' the Greeks, became that Athena of the olive* helm, and cloudy shield, to faith in whomj you owe, down to this date, whatever youj hold most precious in art, in literature, or in types of national virtue. )UT I will not wander into this distant and mythical element; I will only ask you to give its legitimate value to the testis mony of these great poets and men of the world, — consistent, as you see it is, on this head, I will ask you whether it can be supposed that these men, in 'the main work of their lives, are amusing themselves with a fictitious and idle view of [the relations between man and woman ; — nay, I worse than fictitious or idle ; for a thing may be imaginary, yet desirable, if it were possible ? 'but this, their ideal of woman, is, according to our common idea of the marriage relation, wholly undesirable* The woman, we say, is [not to guide, nor even to think for herself* The man is always to be the wiser ; he is to be the thinker, the ruler, the superior in know* ledge and discretion, as in power* ~~*>S it not somewhat important to make up our minds on this matter? Are all these great men mistaken, or are we ? Are Shakespeare and ^schy* lus, Dante and Homer, merely dressing dolls for us ; or, worse than dolls, unnatural visions, {he realization of which, 'were it possible, would bring anarchy into all) households and ruin into all affections? Nay, if you can suppose this, take lastly the evi* y dence of facts, given by the human heart itself, y In all Christian ages which have been remark* able for their purity or progress, there has been absolute yielding of obedient devotion, by the lover, to his mistress* I say OBEDIENT ; — not merely enthusiastic and worshipping in imagination, but entirely subject, receiving from the beloved woman, however young, not only the encouragement, the praise, and the reward of all toil, but, so far as any choice is open, or any question difficult of decision, the DIRECTION of all toil That chivalry, to the abuse and dishonour of which are attri* butable primarily whatever is cruel in war, unjust in peace, or corrupt and ignoble inj domestic relations ; and to the original purity and power of which we owe the defence alike of faith, of law, and of love ; that chivalry, I say, in its very first conception of honour* able life, assumes the subjection of the young knight to the command — should it even be the command in caprice — of his lady. It as- sumes this, because its masters knew that the first and necessary impulse of every truly taught and knightly heart is this of blind I service to its lady: that where that true faith' and captivity are not, all wayward and wicked passion must be ; and that in this rapturous (obedience to the single love of his youth, is^|^| >the sanctification of all man's strength, and * the continuance of all his purposes* And this,i not because such obedience would be safe, or [honourable, were it ever rendered to the un*L 'worthy ; but because it ought to be impossible^ for every noble youth — it IS impossible for |every one rightly trained — to love any one i whose gentle counsel he cannot trust,or whosej prayerful command he can hesitate to obey* DO not insist by any farther argument on this, for I think it 4 should commend itself at oncel to your knowledge of what has] been and to your feeling of what should be* You cannot" think that the buckling on of the knight's armour by his lady's hand was a mere caprio 'of romantic fashion* It is the type of an eternal truth — that the soul's armour is never well set to the heart unless a woman's hand has braced it ; and it is only when she braces it loosely 'that the honour of manhood fails* Know you not those lovely lines — I would they were learned by all youthful ladies of England: — vs m [Iffrri^ffll " Ah, wasteful woman ! — she who may Hjjll Jjjjy On her sweet self set her own price, Knowing he cannot choose but pay — ^kjgjj How has she cheapened Paradise ! Vlif How given for nought her priceless gift, How spoiled the bread and spill'd the wine, Which, spent with due respective thrift, Had made brutes men, and men divine ! 99 See Appendix, Note B. j+\ |HUS much, then, respecting the relations of lovers I believe you| will accept. But what we too, often doubt is the fitness of the continuance of such a relation' throughout thewhole of human llife. We think it right in the lover and mis*- [tress, not in the husband and wife. That is toj say, we think that a reverent and tender duty 4s due to one whose affection we still doubt, and whose char icter we as yet do but partially k and distantly discern ; and that this reverence i and duty are to be withdrawn when the affec- tion has become wholly and limitlessly our own, and the character has been so sifted and, tried that we fear not to entrust it with the happiness of our lives. Do you not see how! .ignoble this is, as well as how unreasonable ? ^yy ^Do you not f eel that marria ge, — w hen it is (marriage at all, — is only the seal which marks the vowed transition of temporary into un* tiring service, and of fitful into eternal love ? ^^^^j^^^jUT how, you will ask, is the idea of this guiding function of the woman reconcilable with a true wifely subjection ? Simply in that it is a GUIDING, not a determining, function. Let me try to show you briefly how these powers i seem to be rightly distinguishable* €E We are foolish, and without excuse foolish, in speaks ing of the "superiority" of one sex to the Mother, as if they could be compared in similar things* Each has what the other has not: each completes the other, and is completed by ithe other : they are in nothing alike, and the happiness and perfection of both depends on each asking and receiving from the other what the other only can give* |OW their separate characters are briefly these. The man's power is active, progressive, defensive* He is eminently the i doer, the creator, the discoverer, i the defender. His intellect is for speculation and invention ; his energy for i adventure, for war, and for conquest, wherever war is just, wherever conquest necessary. But the woman's power is for rule, not for battle, — and her intellect is not for invention or creation, but for sweet ordering, arrange- ment, and decision. She sees the qualities* of things, their claims, and their places. Her great function is Praise; she enters into no, contest, but infallibly adjudges the crown of j contest. By her office, and place, she is pro- tected from all danger and temptation. The man, in his rough work in open world, must- encounter all peril and trial ; — to him, therefore,^ must be the failure, the offence, the inevitable error : often he must be wounded, or subdued ;! often misled ; and ALWAYS hardened. But he guards the woman from all this ; within his house, as ruled by her, unless she herself] has sought it, need enter no danger, no temp* tation, no cause of error or offence. This^ is the true nature of home — it is the place of i Peace ; the shelter, not only from all injury, but from all terror, doubt, and division. In! so far as it is not this, it is not home ; so far' as the anxieties of the outer life penetrate into it, and the inconsistently-minded, unknown, unloved, or hostile society of the outer world' is allowed by either husband or wife to cross the threshold, it ceases to be home ; it is then/ only a part of that outer world which YOu\w/?j