COL. GEORGE WASHINGTON FLOWERS MEMORIAL COLLECTION DUKE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY DURHAM. N. C. PRESENTED BY W. W. FLOWERS Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/miscegenationoraOOcoxs MISCEGEMTION OR AMALaAMATIOK ' FATE OF THIS TRliEDMAM'. J'\JU-v\ SPEECH OF HU^. SAMUEL S. COX, O F O H I O , DELIVERE.) m THE HOUSE OP REPRESEOTATIVES, FEBEUAEY IT5 1864, WASSrtTGTOlSr, D. C. : AT OiTICE OF "THS CONSTITUTIONAt UNION.'* NO 330 E Sl AciSf , 1864. V THE FATE OF THE FEEEDMxiN MISCEGENATION, OR AMALGAMATION. The House having under consideration the bill to establioh a Bureau of Freedmen's Affairs — Mr. COX said : Mr. Speakeb : I did net rise for tlie purpose of discussiog this measure — only to have it referred for discussion. The discussion of its details will be ably conducted by the mi- nority of the committee, the gentleraan from New York [Mr. Kalbfleisch] and the gentle- man from Illinois, [Mr. Knapp.] I shall only call attention to its general features. The member who introduced it [Mr. Eliot] com- mended it to this side for its humanity. He recalled to our minds the fact that vro opposed the confiscation bill for its inhumanity. He hoped that humane considerations would pre- vail as to this bill. I wish that he had set a better example, by his voice and vote upon the other measure. This bill is founded in part on the confiscation system. If that were inhuman, then this is its aggravation. The former takes the lands which are abandoned by loyal or disloyal whites, under the pres- sure of war ; while the present bill turns these abandoned lands over to the blacks. But motives of humanity, however pure, are not the motives that should prompt legislation altogether. I only refer to the confiscation part of the measura to show how comprehensive and all- reaching is this scheme. The industrious gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. Eliot] states that he is the author of the confiscation bill, of which this bill is the sequel. Mr. ELIOT. I did not say that I was the author of the confiscation bill. I said that I reported it from the select committee that had that matter in charge. Mr. COX. I misapprehended the tenor of the gantleman's remarks. I have no doubt that he had a good deal to do with getting it up. The gentleman's modesty will not permit him to claim the credit of it. I rather thick that all of these measures spring from the fertile brain of the Solicitor of the Treasury, ( Mr. Whiting. J He is the reservoir of all the Re- publican heresy and legislation proposed iii this House ; though he is often confounded, I think, with Divine Providence, to whom gen- tlemen are erroneously in the habit of attrib- uting these abolition measures. But to return to the ^member from Massa- chusetts. The f;fFect of former legislation has been, in his opinion, to bring under zhe con- trol of the Q-overnment large multitudes of freedmen who "had ceased to be slaves, but had not lesrced how to be fre?." To care for these multitudes he presents this bill, which, if not crude and undigested, yet is sweeping and revolutionary. It begins a policy for our Federal Government of limited and express power?, so latitudinarian that the whole sys- tem of our Government is changed. If the acts of confiscation and the proclamations, on which this measure is founded, be usurpations, how can we who have denounced them favor a maasure like this ? According to Mr. Whiting this system, to be complete, must include in its provisions all the abandoned lands, all lands forfeited for taxes, all confiscated lands, all derelict per- sonalty, all colored men free before the war in rebellious districts, and all fugitives there- to from loyal States, all legal proceedings of confiscation, all migrations of blacks to and trom rebel States, ail laws compensating mas- ters for slaves, and all other matters relating to the colored people, whether bond or free* This is a new system introduced into our Government. It opens a vast opportunity for greed, tyranny, corruption and abuse. It may be inaugurated in the name of humanityr but I doubt, sir, if any Government, much less our Federal Government of limited and delegated powers, will ever succeed in the philanthropic line of business, such as is contemplated by this bill. The gentleman from Massachusetts appeals to us to forget the past — not to inquire how these poor people have become free, whether by law or by usurpation — but to look the great fact in the face "that three millions- slaves have become and are becoming free." Before I come to that great fact let me first look to the Constitution. My oath to that is^ the highest humanity. By preserving the Constitution amidst the rack of war, in any vital part, we are saving for a better time" something of those liberties. State and per- sonal, which have given so much happiness for over seventy years to so many millions ;• and which, under a favorable Administration, might again restore contentment to our' afflicted people. Hence the highest hu- manity is in building strong the ramparts of constitutional restraint against such radical usurpations as is proposed to be inaugu- rated by measures kindred to this before the House. 4 If the gentleman cin sliow us warrant in tlie Constitution to establish this eleemosyna- ry system for the blacks, and for making the Government of the United States a grand plantation speculator and overseer, and the Treasury a fund for the helpless negro, I will then consider the charitahie light in which he has commended his bill to our sympathies. It does not follow that because (a.s General Butler once said) there were as naany poor in proportion to the people in the poorhouses of Massachusetts who were killed outright by bad treatment as were killed at the battle of Solferino in proportion to those engaged, that we are to interfere by Federal legislation for the victims of Massachusetts inhumanity. I would love to do something for the poor blacks who have been thrown houseless, clotheless, foodless, medicineless, and friend- less on the cold world by the improvident and barbarous philanthropy now in vogue ; but when my constituents ask me for my warrant thus to tax them, I wish to be able to point it out. If you can so frame your bill as to draw no money from the Treasury, and make your scheme self-supporting; or if you can so perfect the system as to connect it legally with the military without degrading the Army, and still discipline and care for the unfortunate blacks, male and female, old and young, strong and weak, then we may consider its propriety and legality with a view to aid its passage. We cannot and do not desire to ignore the fact that incalculable misery has been and will be the fate of the freed negroes ; but it is another and a difficult problem to reconcile the aid they require from the benevolent with our oaths and well-matured judgments as to the province of the Federal Government over matters like this. The gentleman refers us for the constitutionality of this measure to the war power, the same power by which he justifies the emancipation proclamation and similar measures. We upon this side are thoroughly- convinced of the utter sophistry of BHch reasoning. If the proclamation be un- toustitutioual, how can this or any measure based oiUt be valid f The gentleman says, "If the President had the power to free the slave, does it not imply the power to take care of hiia when freed?" Yes, no doubt. If he had any power under the war power he has all power. He is so utterly irresponsible that even Congress^cannot share bis monarch- ical despotism. Under the war power he is a tyrant without a clinch on his revolu- tions. He can spin in any orbit he likes, as far and as long as he pleases. He refers us also to that clause of the Con- stitution which authorizes Congress to de- clare war and make rules concerning captures on land." This latter argument squares with the theory of this war announced by the gen- tleman from Pennsylvania, [Mr. Stevens,] for the authority of Congress to declare war is of course only meant as against foreign na- tions, and Congress can make all rules con cerning captures in siicn a war. But ?inle-s the gentlemen on the other side arc ready to acknowledge the independence of the South, and recognize them as a separate nation o; bel- ligerents, then his argument proves nothing in behalf of this bill, except that he is a the- oretical secessionist. The constitutional ar- gument in favor of this bill is one that this side of this House cannot recognize, unless we are prepared to unsay and undo all that we have said and done to protect the Consti- tution since the abolition measures began to take the form of law. " But," it is urged, something must be done for the poor blacks. They are perishing by thousands. We must look the great fact of aui'l- slavery and its millions of enfranchised victims in the face and legislate for their re- lief." Such is the appeal to our kindlier na- tures. Something should be done. The hu- manity which so long pitied the plumage should not forget the dying bird. But what can be done without violating the Constitu- tion of the United States, or without intrench- ing upon a domain never granted by the States or the people in their written charter of powers ? What can be done ? Oh ! ye honey-toEgued humanitarians of New Eng- land, with your coffers filled from the rough hand of western toil, the beaded sweat of whose industry by the subtle alchemy of your inventive genius is transmuted into the jew- els of your parvenu and shoddy splendor, with your dividends rising higher and higher like waves under this storm of war ; I would be- seech you to go into the camps of the contra- bands, as the gentleman described them, who are starving and pining for their old homes, and lift them out of the mire into which your improvident and premature schemes have dragged them, pour the oil of healing into their wounds, and save a few of them at least from the doom of extirpation. Here is a fit- ting and legal opportunity for the exercise of a gracious humanity. I rejoice to know that many good men, even from New England, have embraced it. But the gentleman urges this legislation, because if it be not passed, the President's proclamation will be made "a living lie." He tl^Jnlcs that "neither the considerate judgment of mankind nor the gracious favor of God can be invoked upon the President's act of free- dom, unless the law shall protect the freedom which the sword has declared." Not merely has the President's proclamation been made a living lie, but the thousands of corpses daily hurried out of the contraband hovels and tents aleng the Mississippi prove it to have been a deadly lie. Neither the judgment of man nor the favor of God can be invoked with- out mockery upon a fanatical project so fraught with misery to the weak and whole- sale slaughter to its deluded victims ! But we are warned to look the great fact in the face that millions unfit for freedom are yet to become free. I know, Mr. Speaker, that we cannot change the fact by closing our 5 eyes. It is true. The revolution rolls on. No effort on the part of tlie Democracy to achieve' a peace through conciliation will now be listened to. The spirit of those in power is the spirit of extermination. The war with its revolutions goes on, and slavery as a polit- ical if not as a social institution may fall un- der its crushing car. It may be that all of the four million slaves will be thrown, like the one hundred thousand already freed, upon the frigid charities of the world. But, sir, if slavery be doomed, so, alas ! is the slave. No scheme like this bill can save him. The In- dian reserves, treaties, bounties, and agencies did not and does not save the red man. No Government farming system, no charitable black scheme, can wash out the color of the negro, change his inferior nature, or save him from his inevitable iate. The irrepressible conflict is not between slavery and Ireedom, but between black and white ; and, as De Tocquerille prophesied, the black will perish. Do gentlemen on the other side rely upon the new system, called by the transcendental abolitionists ^^Miscegenation," to save the ' black? This is but another name for amal- gamation ; but it will not save the negro. True, Wendell Phillips says it is ''God's own method of crushing out the hatred of racej and of civilizing and elevating the world," and Theodore Tilton. th^ editor of the Independent, („ paper publishing the laws of the United. States by authority,J) holds that hereafter the "negro will lose his typical blackness and be found clad in white men's skins." But, sir, no system so repugnant to the nature of our race — and to organize which doubtless the next Congress of Progressives, and perhaps the gentleman from Massachu- setts, will practically provide — can save the negro. Mr. ELIOT. I have no doubt that my friend understands all about it. Mr. COX. I understand all about it, for I have the doctrines laid down in circulars, pamphlets, and books published by your anti- slavery people. But it was not my intention to discuss it now and upon this bill. Mr. PRICE. If all the blacks are crushed out, how is amalgamation to ruin the coun- try ? Mr. COX. They will all run, according to the new gospel of abolition, into the white people, on that side of the House. [Laugh- ter.] Mr. ELIOT. Is that what the gentleman is afraid of ? Mr. COX. No, sir, for I do not believe that the doctrine of miscegenation, or the amalgamation of the white and black, now strenuously urged by the abolition leaders, will save the negro. It will destroy him ut- terly. The physiologist will tell the gentle- man that the mulatto does not live ; he does not recreate his kind ; he is a monster. Such hybrid races by a law of Providence, scarcely survive beyond one generation. I promise the gentleman at some future and ap- I propriate time, when better prepared to de- j velope that idea of miscegenation as now j heralded by the abolitionists, who are in the van of the Republican movement — I Mr. ELIOT. I hope that the gentleman ! will go into it. I Mr. COX. If such be the desire of the gen- i tleman I will attempt it, though reluctantly ; I for my materials, like the doctrine, are a little "mixed." Mr. GRINNELL rose. Mr. COX. I cannot yield to the gentleman. I want none of his impertinences in my speech. The other day when I was speaking he inter- rupted me with them without my consent. I do not recognize him as the member to whom I owe the courtesy of my attention. But since I am challenged to exhibit this doctrine of the abolitionists — called after some Greek words — miscegenation — to mingle and generate— I call your attention first to a circular I hold in my hand. It was circulated at the Cooper Institute the other night, when a female who, in the presence of the Presi- dent, Vice President, and you, Mr. Speaker, and your associates in this Hall, made the same saucy speech for abolition which she ad- dressed to the people of New York. It begins with the following significant quotation from Shakspeare : " The elements So mixed in him that Nature-migh stand up, And say to the world, ' ' This was a man !" [Laughter.] ''Miscegenation, the Theory of the Blending of the Races, applied to the American White Man and Negro. Among the subjects treated of are — " 1. The Mixture of Caucasian and African Blood Essen- tial to American Progress." [Laughter.] "2. How the American may become Comely. [Laugh- ter.] "3. The Type Man a Miscegen— The Sphynx Riddle Solved. " 4. The Irish and Negro first to Commingle, " [Laugh- ter.] " 5. Heart Histories of the Daughters of the South. " 6. Miscegenetic Ideal of Beauty in Woman. " 7. The Future— No White— No Black." If gentlemen doubt the authenticity of this new movement let them go to the office of publication, 113 Nassau street. New York, and purchase. The movement is an advance upon the doctrine of the gentlemen opposite, but they will soon work up to it. The more philosophical and apostolic of the abolition fraternity have fully decided upon the adop- tion of this amalgamation platform. I am informed that the doctrines are already in- dorsed by such lights as Parker Pillsbury, Lueretia Mott, Albert Brisbane, William Wells Brown, Dr. McCune Smith, (half and half — miscegen,) Angelina Grimke, Theodore D. Weld and wife, and others. But these are inferior lights compared with others I shall quote. When I name Theodore Tilton, an editor of the Government paper in Brooklyn called the Independent ; when I re- call the fact that the polished apostle of abo- lition, Wendell Phillips, whose golden-lipped eloquence can make miscegenation as attrac- tive to the ear as it is to the other senses; when I quote from the New York Tribune, the 6 centre and circumference of tlie abolition movement, and Mrs Stowe, whose writings have almost redeemed by tbeir genius the hate and discord which they aided to create ; when I shall have done all this, I am sure the Progressives on the the other side will begin to prick up their ears and study the new science of miscegenation with a view to its practical realization by a bureau. [Laughter. ] First hear the tealirciony of Wendell Phil- lips. He says : " Now I am goiug to say something that I know will make the New York Herald use its small capitals and notes of admiration, and yet no welt-iuformed man this side of Cbina but believes it in the very core of his heart. That is, ' amalgamation,' a word that the northern apolo- gist for slavery has always used so glibly, but which you never heard from a southerner. Amalgamation 1 Re- member this, the youngest of you, that on the 4th day of July, l8o3, you heard a man say that iu the light of all history, in virtue of every page he ever read, he was an amalgumatiouist to the utmost extent. I have no hope for the future, as this country has no past, and Europe.has no past but in that subiime mingling of races which is God's ov/n method of civilizing and elevating the world. God, by the events of His provideace, is crushing out the hatred of race which has crippled this country until to-day." I put it to gentlemen on the other side. Are you responsible for him ? Ah I you re- ceived him, how ardently in this city and Capitol last year. Mr. ELIOT. To whom does the gentleman refer? Mr. COX. Wendell Phillips. The Senate doors flew open for him; the Vice President of the United States welcomed him ; Senators flocked around him ; Representatives cheered his disunion utterances at the Smithsonian ; and you will follow him wherever he leads. He is a practical amalgamationist, and he is leading and- will lead you up to the platfrom on which you will finally stand. You may seem coy and reluctant now, but so you were about the political equality of the negro a year ago ; so you were about abolishing slave- ry in the States two years ago. Now you are in the millennial glory of abolition. So it will be hereafter with amalgamation I Here is what Theodore Tilton, editor of the Independent, says in the circ^ilar to which I have referred : " Have you not seen with your own eyes — ^no man can have eicaped it — that the black race in this couutry is losing its typical blackness? The Indian is dying out; the negro is only changing color 1 Men who, by and by , shall ask for the Indians will be pointed to their graves : 'There lis their asLaes.' Men who, by and by, shall ask for the negroes wid be told, ' There they go, clad in white men's skins.' A hundred years ago a mulatto was a ea- riosily ; now the mulatiocs are half a million. You can yourself predict the future 1" Mr. ELIOT. The gentleman will permit me to say that surely all this was under a state of slavery. Mr. COX. I will show the gentleman di- rectly that his friends and leaders propose to continue it in a state of freedom. It will be the freest kind of license. Mr. ELIOT. The gentleman will allow me to suggest whether the difficulty he labors wader is not that the Democratic party is ' afraid the Republicans will get ahead of them. Mr. COX. I am not afraid of anything of the kind while white people remain upon which we can center our affections and phil- anthropy. You can take the whole monopo- ly of " miscegenation . ' ' We abhor and detest it. The circular referred to has other in- dorsements, which I quote before I reach that Warwick of Republicanism, Horace Greely. The Anti-Slavery Standard of Januarji 30 says : "This pamphlet comes directly and fearlessly to the advocacy of an idea of which the American people are more afraid than any other. Assuredly God's laws will fulfill and vindicate themselves. It Is in the highest de- gree improbable tbat he has placed a natural repugnance between any two families of His children. If He has done so, that decree will execute itself, and these two will never seek intimate companionship togccher. If, on the contrary, He has made no such barrier, no such one is needful or desirable, and every attempt to restrain these parties from exercising their natural choice is in contraveulion of His will, and is an unjust exercise of power. The future must decide how far black and white are disposed to seek each other in marriage. The proba- bility is that there will bo a progressive intermiiagling, and that the nation will be benefitted by it." I hold in my hand the Anglo-AfMcan, of January 23, which discusses this subject from the purely African stand-point : " The author of the pamphlet befose us advances be- yond these lights of the days gone by. What they deemed a remote and undesirable probability he regards as a present and pressing necessity ; what they deemed to be an evil to be legislated against he regards as a blessing which should be hastended by all the legislative and po- litical organizations in the land I The v/ord—nay the deed — miscegenation, the same in substance with tho word amalgamation, the terror of our abolition friends twenty years ago, and of many of them* to-day — miscege- nation, which means intermarriages between whites and blacks — ' miscegenation,' which means the absolute prac- tical brotherhood or social intermingling of blacks and whites, ho would have inscribed on the banner of the Republican party, and' held np as the watchword of the next presidential platform !" ***** * * " We tfike a deep interest in the doctrine shad- owed forth, that to improve a given race of men. It is too late to begin with infant and Sunday schooling; at birth they have the bent of their parents, which we may slightly alter but cannot radically change. The education and improvement should begin with the marriage of par- ties who, instead of strong resemblances, should have contras s which are complementary each of the other. It is disgraceful to our modern civilization that we have societies for improving tho breed of sheep, horses, and pigs, while the human race is left t-o grow up without scientific culture." The editor of the Anglo-African confesses that he is a little staggered in bis theories by what he calls the evident deterioration of the mixed bloods of Central America, but he finds t|je solution of the difficulty in the fact that the races there mixed, Indian and Spanish, are not complementary of each other. This, to my observation, Mr. Speaker, is as absurd as it is untrue. But I am not now arguing the reasonableness of this doctrine of mixed races. I only propose to show what it is, and whither it is tending. The New York Tribune, the great organ of the dominant party, is not so firank as the Anglo-African, but its exposition of "miscege- nation" is one of the signs which point to the Republican solution of our African troubles by the amalgamation of the ra^ea. In indors- ing the doctrine of this pamphlet, Mr. Gree- ley holds that—!, " No statesman in his senses cares to prt morsels of cuticle under a microscopo before be determines upon 7 the prudence of a particular policy. Dvcersity of races is the condition precedent in America, G prcliibited bv the uousiituiioii ; thai, all eilortiS by 11 ibolitionists or others made to induce Congress to inter- utmest tO preserve what they can of local and S P«=«°-»l "f^'y of "^e chao, of this con. alarming and dangerous consequences, and tliat all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happi- ness of the people, and endanger the stability and per- manency of the Union, and ought not to be countenanced by any triendto our political institutions." The Democracy ever favored local sover- eignty as to slavery and every other domestic matter. They would have extended that sov- ereignty, and not slavery, from the States to the Territories. On that question of exten- sion, of non intervention, the Democracy North and South unhappily divided. The consequences are upon us. I accept events as they traaspire. Not re- sponsible for them, yet not unobservant of them, I call the attention of the House to the bold strides which have been made since we last met, by fraud and force, to crush out the institution of slavery. I need not point you to the black recruiting system in Maryland and Missouri. I need not rehearse the orders of generals and subordinates, all working to this end, regardless of the rights of property or local sovereignty. Slavery hangs precari- ously, by a hair, in Tennessee, Arkansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, and Florida. Even in old Kentucky, where her loyal peo- ple cared less for it and more for their State right over it, anti- slavery is at work. Wher- ever in our lines slavery yet^exists, it is com- paratively free and altogether profitless. It works at its own will, and not at the will of the master. Outside of our lines — within the Gulf States — slaves once worth $2,000 are now only worth their $100 in gold; and this depreciation will go on if our armies continue to penetrate the South. If it thus go on, where will it end ? In the grave of the slave ! Read the accounts of mortality among the blacks, especially those in the military. Each camp is a hospital. The deserted families per- ish by their removal from their homes, by vice and starvation. We of this side have no power to stop it. The war keeps it going. For this condition of the negro let the Aboli- tion party and its savage counterpart South answer to God and the country. To the horrors ond calamities of the whites growing out of this war is to be added the miseries and destruction of the blacks ; and this in- dictment of hi?;h crime will not be found against the northern Democracy, but against its revil- ers North, vv'ho divided our Union, audits ene- mies South, who divided our party. In the for 'hcoming election for Chief Mag- istrate you will find the Democracy making no issue about slavery. If it is dying or dead, BS you allege, you will find them striving their personal liberty ®ut of the chaos of this con- flict. We have been the champions of local and State liberty, not because slavery was guarantied by it. No, sir. We have not championed slavery. We never placed it in our northern constitutions. I would fain have seen slavery die, if die it must, by the un- forced action of the States, as it has died in the now free States, and not by the rough usages of war, which destroys the slave with slavery ; not by usurpations upon the rights of the States and the people, which destroy both freedom and slavery and slave, but by the sovereign intelligence of the people of the States, who alone are responsible for the ex- istence of their own domestic institutions. I am not insensible to the signs of the times. Judging fey what we daily see here in this House, the border States, through the blandishments of power, the fear of ruin, the tyranny of the bayonet, and the corruption of greenbacks, are, I think, gradually being persuaded to yield before the genius ot univer- sal emancipation! The music of the old tJnion is hushed in the bugles of war. The northern Democracy, in struggling to pre- serve the institutions of those States, and in doing which they have been and are yet in sympathy with their only proper representa- tives, have done so from no love of slavery ; but because, in the language of the Chicago platform, they would by preserving State institutions, "preserve the balance of power, on which the perfection and endurance of our political fabric depended." When the party in power, by edict and bayonet, by sham election and juggling pro- clamation, drag down slavery, they drag down in the spirit of ruthless iconoclasm iLie very genius of our civil polity, local seU-govern- ment. They strike constitutional liberty in striking at domestic slavery. Hence they must abolish habeas corpus when thtry stab the hated institution. They mwit invade bills of right when they invade State rights. When next you meet us at the polls yon shall answer for the perfection of our politi- cal fabric which you have marre(4, au 1 the en- durance of which you have imperiled. No more wrangling about pro-slavery or anti- slavery. The question shall be, the old order with Democracy to administer it, or continu- ed revolution with destructives to ^uide it; the old Union with as much Bf local sove- reignty as may be saved from the abi'\->i )n of war, or a new abolition and military uuity of territory, with debt, tyranny, and fanaticism as its trinity. ) .•^SOSFECTUS FOR THS NSW YEAR. TECE COMSTITXJTTOlSr^Xi UISriOl^T, A Daily and Weekly Democratic Conservative Union Newspaper. Tile Bold and Fearless Beifeiider of ConstitiaCioaial liiberity I Devoted earnestly to the maintenance of the Constitution as it is, and the restoration of the Union as it was. The CoJTSTiTUTioNAL Uxton" has won, since its establishment, the heartiest approval of all national and conservative men, for its able and fearless advocacy of Constitutional Liberty, Constitutional Eights, and Constitutional Principles. As the Tublisher desires to enlarge the field of its operations by an increase in its subscription list and a more extended circulation, he is encouraged in the belief that it may be made a means of vast and greater usefulness in the important work of the Preservation of the Union, which in His inscrutable wisdom, Providence has committed to the National Conservative De- mocracy ; and in which, if our free form of Constitutional Government is to be preserved there must be neither hesitation, timidity, or delay. The " Constitutional Union" will continue to exercise, as fearlessly as it has heretofore done, its constitutional right of the Freedom of the Press, while it will earnestly contend for the entire Freedom of Speech, and a free and untrammeled ballot for the people, unawed and undismayed by the inter- vention of bands of armed men at the polls', so as to secure a constitutional victory through the ballot-box, a restoration of law and order in the administration of the Government and the election in the autumn of 1864 of a President of the United States who will faithfully and constitutionally administer the duties of his great office. THE DAILY CONSTITUTIONAL UNION is sent to subscribers, by mail, at $8 a year. Clubs, for the daily, of twenty five persons, mailed to one address, $i50 per year. THE WEEKLY CONSTITUTIONAL UNION, for single copies, is furnished by mail a the low rate of a year, and at less prices for Clubs. Especial attention is solicited to our weekly paper, which is a mammoth sheet, filled v^^ith choice matter, and exceedingly desirable, in our judgment, as a periodical visitor at the hearthstone and in the family of every conservative man in the Union. It m.ay be had, considering the enormous price of paper and increased cost of labor and materials, at a very cheap rate, as the scale of prices will show. We suggest the union of effort among friends to form Clubs, by which a large reduciion in the price of the paper is attained. oust TERMS FOR CI. UBS : Single Copies, one year $2 00 Two Copies, one year 3 50 Ten Copies, to one address, with an extra Copy to the person sending the Club. ... 17 50 Twenty Copies, to one address, with an extra Copy to the person sending the Club. . 30 GO Additional names can be added to the Clubs, at any time, at the usual Club rates. SPECIMEN COPIES will be sent to the address of any one who may desire them. All subscriptions to be invariably in advance. Address THOMAS B. FLORENCE, 330 E street, Washington, D. C. The Constitutional Union Recommended and Indorsed. The Democratic and Conservative members of the Thirty-Eighth Congress, now in session, held a meeting at the Capitol, on Monday, January 12, 1864, when it was unani- mously '■'■Resolved^ That the Democratic members of Congress earnestly recommend The Con- stitutional Union, published in Washington, to the patronage and support of the Demo- cratic party of the United Spa tes, as the fearless exponent of sound Democratic doctrines." # Date Due UnnKcl ^ 1 I 1 Form 335— 35M— 9-34— C. P. Co. f I i