COL. GEORGE WASHINGTON FLOWERS MEMORIAL COLLECTION DUKE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY DURHAM, N. C. PRESENTED BY W. W. FLOWERS OBITUARIES, FUNERAL i AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE BAR IN MEMORY OF THE LATE HON. WM. H. BATTLE. I$0 % " ? 9 RALEIGH, N. 0.: UZZELL & WILEY, PRINTERS AND BINDERS. 1879. IN MEMORIAM HON. WM. H. BATTLE. | From the Kaleigh Observer of March 15th, 1879.) DEATH OF JUDGE BATTLE. One of the truly good men of North Carolina died at Chapel Hill yesterday, full of years and full of honors. In the death of Judge Battle, which event occurred at one o'clock yesterday, the State sustained the loss of one of her sons than whom no purer in character has lived or died in any age. William Horn Battle was born in the county of Edgecombe, on the 17th day of October, 1802, and was consequently in the seventy-seventh year of his age at the time of his death. He was the eldest of six sons of Joel Battle, one of the earliest cotton manufacturers of the State; and the Rocky Mount Mills, at the Falls of Tar River, are still in operation under the management and ownership of a member of the Battle family. The paternal ancestor of the subject of this sketch came from Virginia, and his mother was a daughter of Amos Johnston, of Edgecombe. He was descended on both sides from Revolutionary stock, and his forefathers and their descendants have always been among the foremost people of Edgecombe. At the age of sixteen William H. Battle entered the Univer- sity at Chapel Hill, and in two years graduated, having the honor of delivering the valedictory oration, then a prize of the second scholar in the class, in which was the late Bishop Otey of Tennes- see, the late Hon. B. F. Moore, and the venerable William Hill P33572 4 Hardin, late of Fayetteville, and now of Raleigh, and the only surviving member of the class. It is not yet two years since Judge Battle, Mr. Moore, and Mr. Hardin met together in this city, the then surviving members of the class of 1820. On leaving the University, Mr. Battle entered the office of Chief Justice Henderson, where he prepared himself for the Bar, reading for more than three years, during which time he acted as amanuensis for that distinguished jurist ; and so proficient was this young student of law found at the time of his examina- tion for County Court license that the Supreme Court departed from an established rule, and granted him both County and Supe- rior Court license at the same time. On the first of June, 1825, he married Miss Lucy M. Plummer, daughter of Kemp Plummer, Esq., a distinguished lawyer of Warrenton, and in January, 1827, settled for the prac- tice of his profession at Louisburg. The early years of his profes- sional life were not full of promise, and it was always his pleas- ure, and with becoming pride, to attribute the success of his life to the encouraging influences and superior character of his wife He represented Franklin county in the House of Commons in 1833- 7 34, and associated with Thomas P. Devereux, Esq., re- ported the Supreme Court decisions from December, 1834, to December, 1839, inclusive. In 1835 he was associated with Governor Iredell and Judge Nash in preparing the Revised Stat- utes of North Carolina, and personally superintended the printing of that work in Boston. He removed to Raleigh in 1839, and the same year was a delegate to the convention which nominated William Henry Harrison for President of the United States. In politics he was a Whig, but he was never a partisan, and his career as a politician ended with his elevation to the judiciary. Upon the resignation of Judge Toomer, in August, 1840, William H. Battle was appointed by Governor Dudley, and in the following winter elected by the Legislature, one of the Judges of the Superior Court of North Carolina. In 1843 Judge Battle removed to Chapel Hill to superintend the collegiate edu- cation of his sons, and in 1845 he was elected by the Trustees to the Professorship of Law, without any regular salary, however. 5 attaching to the position, and he being charged with no part of the government of the institution. This position he continued to occupy until the University went down in 1868, subsequently to which he abandoned his law school at Chapel Hill, and came to Raleigh to associate in the practice of the law with his sons, Hon. Kemp P. and R. H. Battle, Jr. On the death of Hon. Joseph J. Daniel, Governor Graham, in May, 1848, appointed Judge Battle a Judge of the Supreme Court in his place, but the appointment was not confirmed by the Leg- islature ; although by the same body and within a very few days he was, without opposition, elected a Superior Court Judge, to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Hon. Augustus Moore. He was the choice of both the Whig and Democratic parties, and members united in a letter to him requesting his acceptance of a judicial office tendered without distinction of party, and that he might deem it no reflection to have failed of confirmation for the bench of the higher court, they said : — " The preference of an- other to you for a still higher judicial station, was owing princi- pally to your residing in a county where there are already three Judges, a Governor, and a Senator in Congress." This letter bears date January 9, 1849, and Judge Battle had that day ar- rived in Raleigh to argue a case before the Supreme Court. Urged by Chief Justice Ruffin, as well as the members of the Legislature, to accept the position, he did so, and again went on the Superior Court Bench, from which he was called to the Su- preme Bench in 1852, and continued to preside as an Associate Justice of that court until the inauguration of the Reconstructed State government in July, 1868. The Legislature of 1872-'73 selected Judge Battle to again re- vise the statutes of North Carolina, under the title of Battle's Revisal, and while it was a conspicuous honor thus conferred, it was an act of injustice to devolve such a labor upon one man, and such criticisms as may have been indulged on the work might well have been spared in view of the fact that it w T as the labor of one mind. His peculiar fitness for the revision of our statute laws was made manifest in the Revised Statutes of 1838, and if the General Assembly had seen fit to give Judge Battle associate P33572 6 commissioners, Battle's Revisal would, instead of unjust criticism in some quarters, have received the commendation which the Re- vised Statutes and Revised Code met with at the hands of the Bar. As it is, it is by no means an inferior work to the revisions of other States, but North Carolina having been accustomed to the superior revisions of Iredell, Nash and Battle, in which the latter performed the principal labor, and the Code of Biggs, Moore and Rodman, it is not at all remarkable that the work of one unaided mind should fail to come up to the high standard of that of three such superior legal minds as were employed on each of the two previous revisions. During the last year of Judge Battle's residence in this city he was President of the Raleigh National Bank. In the spring of 1874 he lost his wife, and thus left alone to support the weight of declining years, the lonely old man, leaning upon his children, made his home in Raleigh with his eldest son, Kemp; and he followed that son back to Chapel Hill when he took upon himself the office of re- storing the University, and in that home found all the compan- ionship, comfort and solace that earth could afford him, until worn out at the end of a long life-journey, throughout which every duty to God and man had been religiously and conscientiously performed, he fell asleep to wake in the presence of her who counseled and guided his footsteps from the morn of early man- hood to the eve of an honored and honorable life. Judge Battle was the father of ten children, six sons and two daughters of whom reached their majority. All have died but three sons, Kemp, William and Richard. Two sons, Junius and W. Lewis, were slain in battle. Mrs. Van Wyck, and the other daughter, Susan, have both died since the war. Upon all, the character of the mother, combined with the gentleness of the father, was deeply impressed, and no home was happier in wife and children than that of Judge Battle throughout his long life. He was a Christian gentleman in the fullest meaning of the term. If human perfection were possible, Judge Battle would have attained it. " Jesus saw Nathanael coming to Him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!" 7 For forty years Judge Battle was a communicant member of the Episcopal Church. He was a member of the General Con- ventions of the Church continuously for twenty-five years, save the interruptions of the war, and during that period he was a member of the General Council of the Confederate States, and attended its only session, held at Augusta. The funeral services will be held at Christ Church on Sunday, the church in which he was confirmed, and his remains will re- pose in Oakwood Cemetery, beside those of his wife. A good man and a great man has fallen, for no man is great who is not good. Judge Battle was great in the goodness and simplicity of his character. For modest excellence, unstained and unobtrusive morality, unwavering courtesy, uniform kind- ness, extensive learning, and a judgment firm and impartial, he will be remembered by all who knew him. (From the Raleigh Observer of March 16th, 1879.) MEETING OF THE SUPREME COURT BAR. On yesterday at one o'clock P. M., the following members of the Supreme Court Bar assembled in the Supreme Court room, pursuant to a call of Attorney General Kenan, to adopt resolu- tions in regard to the death of the Hon. William H. Battle, late a Justice of the Supreme Court, and a reporter of the decisions of the Court : Chief Justice W. X. H. Smith, Justice Thomas S. Ashe, Justice John H. Dillard, Hon. E. G. Reade, Hon. A. S. Merrimon, Hon. D. G. Fowle, Hon. Geo. V. Strong, Maj. H. A. Gilliam, Attorney General T. S. Kenan, Hon. W. R. Cox, A. M. Lewis, Esq., Jos. B. Batchelor, Esq., Hon. T. C. Fuller, W. H. Bagley, Esq., Hon. Montford MeGehee, Theo. F. Davidson, Esq., R. T. Gray, Esq., S. G. Ryan, Esq., Capt. S. A. Ashe, T. M. Argo, Esq., Col. Walter Clarke, Geo. M. Smedes, Esq., Geo. H. Snow, Esq., Sam'l F. Mordecai, Esq., Jno. A. Moore, Esq., B. B. Lewis. Jr., Esq., Wm. Bledsoe, Esq., E. R. Stamps, Esq., R. B. Peebles, 8 Esq., W. C. Bowen, Esq., Jno. W. Hinsdale, Esq., A. W. Hay- wood, Esq., and Jno. Devereux, Jr., Esq. On motion of Hon. E. G. Reade, Chief Justice W. N. H. Smith was called to the chair. On motion of Hon. E. G. Reade, John W. Hinsdale and Jno. Devereux, Jr., Esqs., were appointed secretaries. On motion of Hon. A. S. Merrimon, it is Resolved. That the members of the Supreme Court Bar have learned with feelings of deep regret of the death of Hon. William H. Battle. Upon motion of Hon. E. G. Reade, it is Resolved. That the chairman appoint a committee of eight members of the Bar to meet the remains at the depot, and to make the necessary arrangements for the part to be taken by the Bar in the funeral and burial services of the Hon. William H. Battle. Upon motion of Hon. E. G. Reade, it is Resolved. That the chairman appoint a committee of three members of the Bar to prepare resolutions, to be reported to a future meeting of the Bar, to be called by the chairman. The chair appointed the following gentlemen upon the com- mittee to meet the remains at the depot: Maj. Henry A. Gilliam, Capt, R. B. Peebles, Hon. M. McGehee, E. R. Stamps, Esq., John A. Moore, Esq., Maj. R. C. Badger, Jno. W. Hinsdale, Esq., Capt. S. A. Ashe. Upon the committee to prepare resolutions, the chair appointed Hon. E. G. Reade, Hon. D. G. Fowle, and Hon. T. C. Fuller. The chair announced the following gentlemen as having been selected by the family of the deceased to act as pall-bearers : Chief Justice W. N. H. Smith, Justice John H. Dillard, Justice Thomas S. Ashe, Hon. E. G. Reade, Hon. Geo. V. Strong, Hon. D. G. Fowle, Hon. A. S. Merrimon, Hon. T. S. Kenan, Maj. A. M. Lewis, W. S. Mason, Esq., Hon. W. R. Cox, and Hon. Jos. B. Batchelor. Upon motion of Hon. D. G. Fowle, it is Resolved. That the meeting do now adjourn to re-assemble in this Chamber at 4J o'clock to-morrow afternoon, to hear the 9 report of the committee, as to the part to be taken by the Bar in the funeral and burial services. W. N. H. SMITH, Chairman. John W. Hinsdale, John Devereux, Jr., Secretaries. ( From the Raleigh Observer of March 18th, 1879.) THE FUNERAL. As the sun came up out of the forests on the Sabbath morning the old College bell tolled its solemn notes, and the Professors, students and subordinates of the University, and all the villagers, assembled in the Chapel to pay a last honor to a learned teacher, a useful citizen — an old man full of honors and ripe for his re- ward. After the Rev. Joseph B. Cheshire, Jr., had concluded the services, the pall-bearers chosen from the Faculty and citizens, and the committee of escort, consisting of five members from each of the Societies, took up the sorrowful burden and proceeded to Durham. On the outskirts of the village the long line halted and stood uncovered as the small company passed by and went on its way. At Durham they were met by a delegation of citizens who joined the funeral train and acted as a guard of honor until the body was put on the Eastern bound train. Professors Winston and Grandy of the Faculty, the Society committees, and a num- ber of gentlemen from Durham accompanied the remains to Raleigh. At the depot they were met by the following gentle- men, the committee of arrangements appointed by the Bar: Maj. Henry A. Gilliam, Capt. R. B. Peebles, Hon. M. McGehee, E. R. Stamps, Esq., John A. Moore, Esq., Maj. R. C. Badger, John W. Hinsdale, Esq., and Capt. S. A. Ashe, who took charge of the body, and had it placed in the rotunda of the Capitol, where it lay in state for several hours. 2 10 Promptly at 5 o'clock, the hour appointed for the funeral, the pall-bearers, Chief Justice W. N. H. Smith, Justice Thomas S. Ashe, Hon. E. G. Reade, Hon. Geo. V. Strong, Hon. D. G. Fowle, Hon. A. S. Merrimon, Hon. T. S. Kenan, Maj. W. H. Bagley, Maj. A. M. Lewis, W. S. Mason, Esq., Hon. W. R. Cox and Hon. Jos. B. Batchelor, repaired to the Capitol, and in the following order the procession moved to the south entrance of Christ Church : The pall-bearers, the committee of arrangements, the Bar, State officers, citizens of Chapel Hill and Durham, the family, citizens. At the South entrance the body was met by the Rector, who preceded it, repeating the solemn promises of the service. The church was densely crowded and the aisles and galleries were full. The Rev. Dr. Marshall was assisted by the Rev. Mr. Rich, and the Rev. Mr. Cheshire. After the echoes of the last prayer had died away in the gray old church where the venerable man had worshiped for many years, all that was left of him was carried to the city of the dead, that lies along- side the city of the living. Troops of friends followed in car- riages and on foot, and the cemetery was populous with us of to-day honoring us of yesterday They laid him away in his family lot, by the side of her who made life almost as peace- ful and happy for him as the rest to which God has called him. His life was gentle and his death was peace. (From the Raleigh Observer of April 3d, 1870.) THE LATE JUDGE BATTLE. In pursuance of a notice given by the Chief Justice, there was a large meeting of the Bar yesterday, to engage in the ceremo- nies commemorative of the life and services of the late Judge Battle. Chief Justice Smith presided. There were present Mr. Dil- lard and Mr. Ashe, of the Supreme Court, Mr. Kenan, the Attorney General, Messrs. Merrimon, Fowle, Reade, Cox, Gil- 1 1 Ham, C. M. Busbee, Fuller, Ashe, Gray, W. H. Bagley, Fab. H. Busbee, Clark, A. M. Lewis, Harris, Stamps, R. G. Lewis, Mason, Pace, Ryan, Smedes, Overman, W. P. Batchelor, Mon- tague, B. B. Lewis, W. H. Bledsoe, John Devereux and Gudger. Mr. Reade read the resolutions adopted by the committee ap- pointed at a previous meeting. They were as follows: The committee appointed at a meeting of the Bar on the 14th of March, to prepare resolutions commemorative of the life and services of the late Hon. William H. Battle, respectfully report: William Horn Battle was born on the 17th of October, 1802. He was the eldest of six brothers. His father was Joel Battle, and his mother was a daughter of Amos Johnson. They were of the first families in Edgecombe county. William H. Battle graduated at the University of North Caro- lina, at the age of about eighteen, with distinction, delivering the valedictory address. Soon after graduating he began the study of the law with Chief Justice Henderson, and some three years thereafter was so well prepared that the Supreme Court gave him license for both the County and Superior Courts at his first examination, which was unusual at that time. He married Miss Lucy Plummer, the daughter of Kemp Plummer, a distinguished lawyer of Warren, and soon after located at Louisburg. He had not the qualities to push him early to the front in his profession. He was modest and retiring, and won his way to public confidence by industry and fidelity. He represented his county for a few years in the Legislature, but his public services were almost entirely professional. From 1834 to 1839, he was, in conjunction with Thomas P. Devereux, Reporter to the Supreme Court. In 1835 he and Governor Iredell and Judge Nash were ap- pointed to revise the statutes of the State, and to his learning and industry the Revised Statutes owed much of its excellency. After he was seventy years of age the Legislature again appointed him alone to revise the statutes, allowing him but little time for the work. This was a high compliment, but it was too much 12 for any man to perform, and he did not complete it to his own satisfaction. He republished some of the older Supreme Court Reports, with annotations, and at different times published four volumes of digests of the Reports, which are the only digests now in use. In 1840 he was appointed by the Governor, and during the same year was elected by the Legislature, a Judge of the Supe- rior Court, which office he filled with great acceptability until 1848, when he was appointed by the Governor to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court Bench. The Legislature, however, did not elect him to that position, solely on account of his location, in a county where there were already three Judges and a Sena- tor in Congress; but he was, however, by the same Legislature, reinstated in a very complimentary manner upon the Superior Court Bench. In 1852 he was elected to the Supreme Court Bench, which place he occupied until 1865, when all the State offices were declared vacant. He was then again elected to the Supreme Court Bench, and occupied that position until the new organization of the Court in 1868. The discharge of his duties on the Supreme Court Bench w r as entirely satisfactory. His de- cisions were just and his opinions plain and learned. He was for many years Professor of Law at the University, and many of the lawyers of the State were his pupils. After he left the Supreme Court Bench in 1868, he associated himself with his sons, Kemp and Richard, in the law firm of Battle & Sons, and prepared and argued cases in the Supreme Court. Judge Battle gave not a few years of worn-out life, but his whole manhood of a half a century, to the service of God; not a cold, formal service, but a warm, active, useful service, to which everything else was subordinate. And he died supported by the Christian faith, on the 14th of March, 1879, without fear and without reproach. The following resolutions are recommended: The members of this meeting will wear the usual badge of mourning during the present term of the Supreme Court, That a copy of these resolutions be sent to the family of the deceased by the chairman. 13 That a copy of the resolutions and report be presented to the Supreme Court, with the request that they be entered on its minutes. E. G. READE, D. G. FOWLE, T. C. FULLER, Committee. HON. A. S. MERRIMON's SPEECH. Mr. Merrimon, addressing the Chairman, said : Mr. Chairman: I was acquainted a long while with the late Judge Battle. I came to understand very well and to appreciate highly his character and worth as a man and as a citizen in pri- vate and public life. I entertained for him while living pro- found respect and an unusual warmth of friendly feeling. Now that he has passed away from our midst forever, I venerate his memory. My recollections of him will ever be fresh and of the most pleasing and agreeable character. I experience a mourn- ful satisfaction in joining in these solemn ceremonies, and am glad to have this opportunity to pay a brief and imperfect tribute to the worth of my departed friend. Judge Battle's was a high type of personal character. He possessed a vigorous and well developed intellect, and took large and clear views of every subject that came within the range of his thought. His mind was well stored with general and varied information. He had decided convictions upon most questions interesting to him, and when necessary, acted upon them with becoming firmness; but he was singularly free from bigotry. He was catholic, just and tolerant in his views of men and things. His moral nature predominated in his character. He had a high moral sense. He thought that the happiness of society, collect- ively and individually, depended upon the rectitude of human conduct in all the relations of life. He loved the right and to promote all its ends. It was always his purpose to think and act rightly; he did no intentional wrong. If sometimes he made mistakes, he generally gave his support to the right side 14 of all questions involving doubt. He was foremost in the advo- cacy of such measures as his judgment approved and he deemed important. His nature and his conduct were alike gentle, affable and kind — he was just and charitable, generous and merciful, cour- teous and honorable — he was polite and paid due regard to his fellow-man in every condition of life; he was justly beloved by everybody who knew him, of all classes. I do not think he had an enemy in the world. He was not insensible to praise; he appreciated commendation, and he did not withhold it from the meritorious. He had deep religious convictions. He believed firmly in God and the Christian religion, and earnestly and consistently laid hold of the Cross as the sure foundation for his hopes of im- mortality and eternal blessedness. His physical stature was not large; it was well proportioned; he had a manly presence and bearing, but he was not obtrusive; on the contrary he was modest and retiring. His face was usually lit up with a pleasant smile, and good will beamed forth in every feature. Judge Battle was an earnest and true patriot. He sincerely loved his country and her institutions. He was ever the firm and unyielding friend of civil liberty. I never saw him more earnest and determined than in a protracted struggle in behalf of public liberty some years ago, in which he bore a leading part. His views on political questions and measures were decided, and he quietly identified himself with some political party, but he was never a politician in the ordinary acceptance of that term. He was a well-read, painstaking and sound lawyer. He was well grounded in the great principles of the law, and was espe- cially familiar with the laws and judicial decisions of our own State. Indeed, there has been no lawyer more learned than he in the laws of this State. He was exceedingly fond and proud of his profession, he upheld its honor always and everywhere, and he was an honor to it. 15 He was a learned, patient and upright Judge. In this capac- ity, he was much identified with the public and most distinguished. He sat upon the Superior Court Bench for many years, and for a much longer period on the Supreme Court Bench. His deport- ment as a Judge was orderly and dignified, always commanding the confidence, respect and affection of the legal profession and the people. His judicial opinions were well considered and able, some of them strikingly so, and they afford an enduring monu- ment to his memory, while they reflect high distinction on the Bench of our State. I shall not say that Judge Battle was a great man in any single respect, but he was great in the unity, symmetry, good- ness and beauty of his character. His whole record is stainless. It is a long one, alike honorable to himself, to his profession, the Bench and the State. His life was a long and eminently useful one. In the order of things, he died peacefully, full of consola- tion, and crowned with blessings and honor. It affords me pleasure to say these plain words, because they are true and just. Let us ever remember and endeavor to emu- late this noble example. May my end of this life be that of our departed friend ! MR. S. A. ASHE'S SPEECH. Me. Chairman: — Although my acquaintance with Judge Battle was of comparatively recent date, my association with him was so agreeable that I cannot remain silent on this occasion, when we have assembled to do honor to his memory. To portray the virtues of departed citizens who have worthily filled high station in the State, has been the custom among men in all ages and all countries, and the practice is no less honorable to human nature than it is beneficial in its tendencies to the social condition of man. By presenting to public view the characteristics of men emi- nent for noble qualities of mind and heart, and tracing the relation which these characteristics have borne to an honorable career, we recommend them to those who would profit by human experience and convert the illustrious dead into living influences 16 even more potent for good than while they yet moved in their accustomed places among the homes of men. By this means men survive their material annihilation, and live through time as bright examplars, or as beacon lights to warn posterity against the defects of human character. In the lapse of years as the period of their activity recedes in the obscurity of the past, what they had in common with man- kind is utterly forgotten, and they are known only in an action or a sentiment which elevates their names above the stagnant waters of oblivion. Thus the virtue of Cato, the patriotism of Cincinnatus, the heroism of Leonidas, are now the ideas these names evoke, the lessons they teach to each succeeding genera- tion of distant nations. Fortunate then is that land where monuments are erected to the memory of its illustrious dead, where the lesson of their lives is constantly enforced and where their great actions, noble qualities and their virtues are not buried away out of sight with the useless dust that once was vivified by the immortal parts of departed worth. There was little about Judge Battle to dazzle the fancy, excite the imagination or inflame ambition, but yet the story of his life is one of the most valuable to be found in the history of our State. The heroes of our battles, it is true, have not engaged in car- nage either for conquest, plunder, or lust of glory. Our states- men are honored in proportion as they devote themselves to se- curing the rights of man, to ameliorating the condition of their fellow-citizens and establishing society on the eternal principles of justice. But these are actors in exciting scenes; their lives feverish; their success uncertain and subject to varying vicissi- tudes; their triumphs oftentimes mingled with bitterness; their pathways beset with dangers and full of snares. Courageous, patriotic, virtuous, wise as they may be, their career not unfre- quently terminates in disaster, and their sun goes down with lowering clouds obscuring its effulgence, while envy, jealousy and repining augment the evils that have overtaken them. But when we consider the life of Judge Battle we feel emo- 17 tions of pleasure similar to those which affect us on viewing some lovely and picturesque landscape. The awful chasm, the stu- pendous and grand mountain, the sublime and majestic ocean moved by an unseen and mysterious power, are absent from the picture. All is placid, serene and harmonious, and we are sensible of a lively gratification whether the eye rests upon any particular part or we take in the entire scene at one general view. Here are displayed great amiability, joined with firmness and decision of character; unusual modesty, associated with self-re- liance and courage of opinion ; learning and high station, adorned by a gentle carriage and polite courtesy ; a laborious life, uncan- kered by scheming ambition ; virtue and honor, fostered by manly sentiments, and resting on the simple faith that the source of all virtue, and the fountain of all honor, is that Supreme Being to whom he ascribed his creation, preservation, and all the bless- ings of his life. There was a roundness and completeness about Judge Battle's character that accords well with the symmetry of his life. In every relation he was a true and lawful man. Assuming duties he discharged them zealously and to the best of his ability. As a lawyer, he w r as studious, conscientious and faithful, and never deviated from that honorable deportment whose general observance has exalted our profession above all other secular employments. The Bar has ever been the mainstay of popular liberty. It has long been its traditionary office to hold the mean between license and oppression ; to preserve the liberties of the people, to conserve the just pow r ers of government on whose efficacy de- pends the whole fabric and structure of our civilization and social polity. Knowing the limits of lawful power, it is our glory to have ever interposed to check by peaceful means its un- lawful exercise. From generation to generation the story repeats itself. And in our own day we have witnessed Bragg, Graham and Battle (and another still living) standing side by side in a doubtful contest for the supremacy of law and the right of the citizen to freedom and personal liberty. 3 18 It would hardly become me to pass even favorable judgment on this distinguished jurist, who served most acceptably upon the Bench for more than a quarter of a century. His opinions as written in the reports speak for themselves. They will go down to posterity an enduring monument of his judicial excellence and juridical attainments. It is enough for me to say that his fellow-citizens placed him on the Bench with Ruffin and Pearson — noscitur a sociis! As a Judge he was upright, learned and full of veneration for the sages of the law. In the administration of justice he was patient, prompt, firm and courageous. A trivial incident recently narrated to me by one who wit- nessed it, illustrates a phase of his character. It was many years ago, when he was riding the circuit in a distant county. A Solicitor, who was a man of desperate resolution and unbridled will, not unfrequently appeared in Court greatly under the in- fluence of drink. His high spirit and determined and reckless bearing had apparently deterred some of the Judges from enforc- ing decorum on these occasions. Indeed, it was supposed that he would not submit to interference or rebuke on the part of any Judge. When, however, Judge Battle rode that circuit and the Solicitor appeared in Court intoxicated, the Judge promptly told him he was in no condition to perform his duties, and directed another lawyer to take charge of the docket, and then added : "And if you, sir, appear before me intoxicated again, I will put you in jail for contempt/ 7 It is said that after that, other Judges found no difficulty in making the same order. It was my fortune to have been associated with this distin- guished citizen, not only at the Bar, but in some other relations. And I may be pardoned for making a brief allusion to the fervor with which he discharged his religious duties. A person of his cast of mind and singleness of purpose might well be presumed to have strong religious convictions. His faith was indeed a part of his daily life. Believing, he accepted Christianity, and the principles of the Gospel became his principles, and its pre- cepts, as far as may be, his practice. Speaking after the manner 19 of men, he was an ornament to the Church with which he was connected, and his Christian faith and walk in life adorned and ennobled his character, enlarged and refined his virtue, and gave him an indefeasible title to be known as a Christian gentleman, the worthiest appellation that can be earned by mortal man. It is said that when Judge Battle first came to the Bar, he was, like Blackstone, so unsuccessful in obtaining business, that for years no case was committed to his charge. And yet he achieved the highest honors in his profession! Truly in his case may it be said, that labor conquers all things. Possessed of no dazzling qualities, not gifted with splendid genius, unversed in the art of pushing one's fortunes to a suc- cessful issue, by his shining virtue, by his high character, by his solid learning, by his industry and professional attainments, he won for himself the respect and admiration of a noble people, and gained without solicitation the measure of a worthy ambition. Little could he have anticipated when year after year passed and left him as it found him, briefless, despairing, hopeless of professional preferment, that in his after life there would be full compensation for all the despondency of that gloomy period. But a cold winter brings its hot summer, and with him the thaws of spring gave way to a warm sunshine that lasted far into the autumn of his life, until indeed he was in the sere and yellow leaf, ready to fall when nature should do its kindly office and transfer his immortal soul to another sphere. Such is the record of this man's life! Many days well spent; many duties well performed; a life of labor high in judicial station; a life of courtesy and stainless honor; a life devoted to his country and his God ! Than this, lawful ambition hath no higher mark ! REMARKS OF HON. WM. R. COX. Mr. Chairman: — In placing a garland upon the tomb of our distinguished brother, I do not propose to linger upon his early struggles, his triumphs at the Bar, nor dwell upon his ac- complishments as a Judge. For those matters have been com- prehensively and appropriately epitomized by those who have 20 preceded me, some of whom have known him longer, but not more intimately than myself. The few remarks I propose to submit, shall be confined chiefly to his distinguishing characteristics as a private citizen and as a public man. From our first acquaintance he impressed me with his great purity and simplicity of character, and though then in the zenith of his fame, there was nothing ostentatious, nothing pretentious in his manner or bearing. I readily perceived that his promotion had not been in any respect meretricious, and sought to discover by what means his success had been achieved, and the task was not a difficult one. It arose from a zealous economy of his time; a methodical manner; great purity of character and a conscientious and punctilious observance of every duty required of him. He was steadfast, but not obtrusive in his opinions, charitable to all, firm and unswerving in his personal and political integrity. And thus he furnished to the young men of the profession, to whom he was ever kind and considerate, a living example of what may be accomplished without brilliant talents, by a rigid adhesion to principle and a diligent improvement of those oppor- tunities which may be enjoyed by all. He took much pleasure in attending the general and Diocesan Conventions of his Church, and in these bodies of distinguished men ever occupied a prominent, yea, a leading part, and here- after his absence will be greatly lamented. His Christian char- acter at all times was hopeful, cheerful and conspicuously exemplary, and was the crowning glory of his old age. There was nothing ascetic in his nature. In every enterprise calculated to promote the welfare of his State, he took an active interest, as well as in those matters which were intended to benefit the com- munity in which he lived, and in discharging the duties then imposed upon him through committees, without demurrer on his part he moulded the thought and performed the chief part of the labor. Wielding a ready pen, I assert with confidence, without enu- merating his various memorials, that he contributed more to the legal and biographical literature of our profession than any man 21 in the State. He was a friend to popular education and sensitive to calls of poverty and distress, which he relieved with a gener- ous hand, according to his ability. "Take him for all in all," he came nearer employing usefully all the talents with which he was endowed than any man with whom I was ever brought into intimate relations. On the Bench his uprightness and integrity of character caused even the humblest to feel that justice would be administered without prejudice or favor, and his courtesy to the Bar restrained and controlled those ebullitions of feeling which will occasionally arise in the trial of important causes. When Sir Matthew Hale died, his friend Baxter purchased a Bible, in which he placed a print of the deceased, and underneath wrote these words: "Sir Matthew Hale — the pillar of justice, who would not have done an unjust thing for any worldly prize or motive." This eulogium to England's great judge may be truthfully applied to our distinguished friend, and those who knew him intimately and his conduct in regard to his elections can most fully appreciate its appropriateness. However coveted the prize of the ermine, no assurance of success could tempt him to veer from what he believed to be right to secure it; he considered that a judgeship should be a free-will offering, and the same purity and independence which ought to distinguish its possessor should regulate the action of those by whom it was conferred. And thus able, amiable, courteous, unselfish and just, true to his country, endeared to his friends, respected by all his neigh- bors, tender and exemplary in his family relations, he closed a long life of usefulness and ended his mission surrounded by his child- ren, after having participated in the baptism of a descendant of the third generation. After such a life, who would not desire that his last days might be such as his? Thus departing, he has left e'en upon the mountain top of death a light which gives assur - ance of a blessed immortality. " Light be the sod which rests upon his breast; green be the grass that grows upon his grave; eternal be the laurels that flourish round his tomb." 22 SUBSTANCE OF THE REMARKS OF MR. F. H. BUSBEE. Mr. Chairman: — It will be difficult to add aught to the well considered eulogies we have just heard, but my own grati- tude to my dead friend will not permit me to keep silent. My first lessons in the law were learned at his feet, and as a student at the University, of slender means, I received kindnesses at his hands which I shall never forget. A recent newspaper has sneeringly commented upon the reso- lutions and addresses of meetings of the Bar in honor of deceased brethren, and suggests that our admiration of, and love for, these gentlemen was never suspected while living. The shaft falls hurtless to-day. It is true, that while our brethren are with us, there is no occasion for an expression of our estimates of their lives and characters, and it is only when they have passed "over to the great majority beyond," that we are called upon to place on record the memorial of their life-work. I have been struck to- day with the moderation, and, as far as I can judge, the accuracy with which Judge Battle's character has been portrayed. He was no splendid genius, no thrilling orator; he was a laborious and learned jurist; he lived and died a Christian gentleman. Who could desire a n6bler epitaph ? I desire simply to point a single moral from his life for the instruction and encouragement of the younger members of the profession. The leading features of Judge Battle's career were his unwearied industry, and his unbending integrity; wherever these characteristics came into prominence his success was sure. At the University he stood among the first in a class of great intellectual ability ; as a law student his preparation was so thorough that the Supreme Court gave him both Superior and County Court licenses upon a single examination. And then, when he had settled in the quiet village of Louisburg, came the days of doubt and despondency. Possessed of a small library, his studies were for the most part confined to the old text-books, and to the North Carolina decisions, the latter especially. Not a popular orator, with no art of the demagogue, daily seeing men, his inferiors, attaining a success in the smaller Criminal and 23 County Court practice beyond his own, how he must have wearied in his work, and have asked himself what good will all this labor accomplish? The temptation to follow in their easier pathway must have been strong. Yet he was then laying the foundation for his future success in life; but for the struggling years of slender practice at Louisburg, his familiarity with the decisions of North Carolina could never have been attained, and his subsequent career would have been totally different. When the opportunity came, an opportunity so gratefully and gracefully acknowledged in the preface to his Digest, he showed in his work upon the Reports the stuff that was in him, and his future was assured. Step by step, laboriously he rose until he received the highest professional honors in the gift of his State, and won them by the divine right of labor and of merit. I shall not trespass upon the time of the meeting by adding my appreciation of Judge Battle's Christian character. It per- meated the whole man. You cannot view him as a lawyer, as a judge, or as a citizen, without seeing everywhere his perfect faith in Christianity, his stainless delicacy of thought and expression, his unswerving honor and honesty If he be not a fit exemplar for the young men of North Carolina, I know not w T here one can be found. He crowned a long life of usefulness with a peaceful death among his kindred, and in sound of the college bell that had called the best youth of the State around him for so many years. I join Mr. Lewis in congratulating his sons upon the manner and the time of his death. Felix non solum vitce claritate, sed etiam opportunitate mortis. SUBSTANCE OF THE REMARKS OF MR. E. R. STAMPS. Mr. Chairman : — I only ask the indulgence of the brethren of the Bar for one moment. I have seen somewhere that a certain Englishman had such reverence for the character of Sir Philip Sidney that he said he wanted no prouder epitaph upon his tomb than this: " Here lies the friend of Sir Philip Sidney," and so I arise simply that I may be recorded as a friend and ad- mirer of our honored brother. A man is never great, Mr. Chairman, unless he is good. Judge Battle was good and true, 24 and his death, unlike that of most of us, causing but a slight shadow upon our own family hearthstone, casts a sombre gloom across our whole State. I will mention but one trait of his character that has come to my notice, and which has not been touched on by the gentlemen who have preceded me, that is, he never used his tongue to back-bite his fellows, he never "took up a reproach against his neighbor," but was always kind and courteous, and ever ready to cheer and encourage his younger professional brother. Mr. Chairman, no man should desire a nobler heritage than that which Judge Battle has left, the glory of a life of toil, and an unsullied name. (Obituary by Mrs. C. P. Spencer in the Churchman of April 12th, 1879.) JUDGE BATTLE OF NORTH CAROLINA. One of the representative men of North Carolina and of the Church of Christ has been laid to sleep and gathered to his fathers. The Hon. Wm. H. Battle, LL. D., late Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, departed this life March 14th, 1879, in Chapel Hill, at the residence of his son, the Hon. Kemp P. Battle, President of the State University. He was born October 17th, 1802, in Edgecombe county, where his an- cestors were among the earliest settlers, and where the Battle family has always been numerous, prominent and respected. Judge Battle graduated at the University of North Carolina in 1820, having the honor of the valedictory oration. He read law in the office of Chief-Justice Henderson, and entered upon the practice of his profession in 1823. In 1825 he married Lucy Martin, daughter of Kemp Plummer, Esq., a prominent lawyer of Warrenton — a union which largely determined the advantage and happiness of his future life. His rise in his pro- fession was at first slow, and those early years of probation were cheered and stimulated by the unfaltering devotion, cheerful- 25 ness and energy of his admirable partner. In later life, when many and well-deserved honors had crowned his labors, Judge Battle was fond of recalling that time and ascribing, with no ungraceful pride, much of his perseverance and success to the gentle but powerful influences of his home. Between the years 1827 and 1840, Judge Battle resided in Louisburg. He represented Franklin county in the Legislature, and was engaged in reporting the Supreme Court decisions from 1834 to 1839. In 1835 he was associated with Governor Ire- dell and Judge Nash in preparing the Revised Statutes of North Carolina. He removed to Raleigh about 1840, and was elevated to the Superior Court Bench in that year. In 1843 he removed to Chapel Hill, the seat of the University, for the purpose of educating his sons in an institution which was an object of life- long affection to him as an Alumnus and as a Trustee, where his father and five brothers, and where, finally, all of his own six sons were educated. Here he was elected to the Professorship of Law, conducting for many years a successful law school. In 1852 he was called to the Supreme Court Bench, and sat as Asso- ciate Justice till the reconstruction of the State government at the close of the war. The University going down in the same revolution, he again moved to Raleigh, and, associating his sons, Kemp P. and R. H., with him, built up a leading and lucrative practice at the Bar. In 1866 he was elected President of the Raleigh National Bank. Two years before, he lost his devoted wife. Upon the revival of the University, his eldest son, K. P. Battle, was elected President of the institution, and the Judge, having made his home with him, in 1877 accompanied the family back to Chapel Hill, to close his wearied eyes among old friends and well-beloved scenes, soothed by the tender care of children and grandchildren, and sustained by an unfaltering trust in that Saviour in whose love he said emphatically he believed, to whose Cross he clunOSS CIHCOLAT*