3 , Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/compendioussyste01fyfe I I A COMPENDIOUS SYSTEM O F ANATOMY. IN SIX PA.RTS. Part I. Osteology. II. Of the Muscles, ETC. III. Of the Abdomen. Part. IV. Of the Thorax. V. Of the Brain and Nerves. VI. Of the senses. ILLUSTRATED WITH TWELVE LARGE COPPERPLATES. EXTRACTED from the American CBlsition OF THE ENCYCLOP.(E,DlA. NOW PUBLISHING, BY THOMAS DOBSON, AT TllE STONE HOUSE, N® 41, SECOND STREET, PHILADELPHIA. M DCCilCII. J- e / i 9 . I A SYSTEM! O F ANATOMY. z A natomy is the art of difle^ting, or arti- ficially feparating and taking to pieces, the different parts of the human body, in order to an exa£t difcovery of their fituation, ftrudure and oeconomy. The word is Greek, derived from to diffed, or feparate by Cutting. INTRODUCTION. § I. Hijlory of Anatomy. This art feems to have been very ancient; though, for a long time, known only in an im- perfedt manner. — The firft men who lived muft A 2 have 4 INTRODUCTION, have foon acquired fome notions of the ftrudure of their own bodies, particularly of the external parts, and of fome even of the internal, fuch as bones, joints, and finews, which are expofed to the examination of the fenfes in living bodies. This rude knowledge mull have been gradu- ally improved, by the accidents to which che body is expofed, by the neceffities of life, and by the various cuftoms, ceremonies, and fuper- ftitions, of different nations. 'I'hus, the obferv- ance of bodies killed by violence, attention to wounded men, and to many difeafes, the vari- ous ways of putting criminals to death, the fune- ral ceremonies, and a variety of fuch things, muft have fhown men every day more and more of themfelves ; efpecially as curiofity and felf-love would here urge them powerfully to obfervation and reflection. The brute-creation having fuch an affinity to man in outward form, motions, fenfes, and ways of life ; the generation of the fpecies, and the effect of death upon the body, being obferved to be fo nearly the fame in both ; the conclufion was not only obvious, but unavoidable, that their bodies were formed nearly upon the fame model. And the opportunities of examining the bodies of brutes were fo eafily procured, indeed fo ne- ceiTarily occurred in the common bufmefs of life, that the huntfman in making ufe of his prey, the priefl in facrificing, the augur in di- vination, and, above all, the butcher, or thofe who INTRODUCTION. 5 who might out of curiofity attend upon his ope-= rations, muft have been daily adding to the little flock of anatomical knowledge. Accordingly we find, in fa£t, that the South-fea-iflanders, who have been left to their own obfervation and rea- foning, without the alfiftance of letters, have yet a confiderable lhare of rude or wild anatomi- cal and phyfiological knowledge. -Dr Hunter informs us, that when Omai was in his mufeum with Mr Banks, though he could not explain himfelf intelligibly, they plainly faw that he knew the principal parts of the body, and fome- thing likewife of their ufes ; and manifefled a great curiofity or defire of having the funftions of the internal parts of the body explained to him ; particularly the relative functions of the two fexes, which with him feemed to be the moft interefting objed; of the human mind. We may further imagine, that the Philofo- phers of the moft early ages, that is, the men of curiofity, obfervation, experience and reflec- tion, could not overlook an inftance of natural organization, which was fo interefting, and at the fame time fo wonderful, more efpecially fuch of them as applied to the ftudy and cure of difeafes. We know that phyfic was a branch of philofo- phy till the age of Hippocrates. Thus the art muft have been circumftanced in its beginning. We lhall next fee from the tef- timony of hiftorians and other writers, how it adually appeared as an art, from the time that writing 6 INTRODUCTION, writing was introduced among men ; how it waf improved and conveyed down to us through a long feries of ages. Civilization, and improvements of every kind, would naturally begin in fertile countries and healthful climates, where there would be leifure for reflection, and an appetite for amufement. Accordingly, writing, and many other ufeful and ornamental inventions and arts, appear to have been cultivated in the eaftern parts of Afia long before the earlieft times that are treated of by the Greek or other European writers ; and that the arts and learning of thofe eaftern people were in fubfequent times gradually communi- cated to adjacent countries, efpecially by the me- dium of traffic. The cuftoms, fuperftitions, and climate of eaftern countries, however, appear to have been as unfavorable to practical anatomy, as they were inviting to the ftudy of aftronomy, geometry, poetry, and all the fofter arts of peace. Animal bodies there, run fo quickly into nau- feous putrefaction, that the early inhabitants muft have avoided fuch offenfive employments, as ana- tomical inquiries, like their pofterity at this day. And, in fad:, it does not appear, by the writ- ings of the Grecians, or Jews, or Phoenicians, or of other eaftern countries, that anatomy was particularly cultivated by any of thofe eaftern na- tions. In tracing it backwards to its infancy, we cannot go farther into antiquity than the times of the Grecian philofophers. As an art in the ftate INTRODUCTION. 7 ftate of fome cultivation, it may be faid to have been brought forth and bred up among them as a branch of natural knowledge* The sera of philofophy, as it was called, be- gan with Thales the Milefian being declared by a very general confent of the people, the moft wife of all the Grecians, 480 years before Chrift. The philofophers of his fchool, which was called the Ionian, cultivated principally natural know- ledge. Socrates, the feventh in fucceffion of their great teachers, introduced the ftudy of morals, and was thence faid to bring down philofophy from heaven, to make men truly wife and hap- In the writings of his fcholar and fuccelfor Plato, we fee that the philofophers had carefully ccmfidered the human body, both in its organi- zation and funfhions ; and though they had not arrived at the knowledge of the more minute and intricate parts, which required the fucceffive la- bour and attention of many ages, they had made up very noble and comprehenfive ideas of the fubjeft in general. The anatomical defcriptions of Xenophon and Plato have had the honour of being quoted by Longinus (§ xxxii.) as fpeci- mens of fublime writing : and the extract from Plato is ftill more remarkable for its containing the rudiments of the circulation of the blood. “ The heart (fays Plato) is the centre or knot of the blood-veifels ; the fpring or fountain of the blood which is carried impetuoufly round ; the blood 8 INTRODUCTION. blood is the pabulum or lood of the flefh ; and, for the purpofe of nourifhment, the body is laid out into canals, like thofe which are drawn through gardens, that the blood maybe conveyed, as from a fountain, to every part of the pervious body.” - Hippocrates was nearly contemporary with the great philofophers of whom we have been fpeak- ing, about 400 years before the Chriftian- aera. He is faid to have feparated the profeflion of philofophy and phyfic, and to have been the firft who applied to phyfic alone as the bufmefs of his life. He is likewife generally fuppofed to be the firft who wrote upon anatomy. We know of nothing that was written exprefsly upon the fubjedt before ; and the firft anatomical dilfedHon which has been recorded, was made by his friend Democritus of Abdera. If, however, we read the works of Hippo- crates with impartiality, and apply his accounts of the parts to what we now know of the human body, we muft allow his defcriptions to be im- perfect, incorrect, fometimes extravagant, and often unintelligible, that of the bones only ex- cepted. He feems to have ftudied thefe with more fuccefs than the other parts, and tells us that he had an opportunity of feeing a human fkeleton. From Flippocrates to Galen, who fiourifhed towards the end of the fecond century, in the decline of the Roman empire, that is, in the fpace INTRODUCTION. 9 fpace of 600 years, anatomy was greatly im- proved ; the philofophers ftill confidering it as a moft curious and interefting branch of natural knowledge, and the phyficians, as a principal foundation of their art. Both of them, in that interval of time, contributed daily to the com- mon ftock, by more accurate and extended ob- fervations, and by the lights of improving philo- fophy. As thefe two great men had applied very par- ticularly to the ftudy of animal bodies, they not only made great improvements, efpecially in phyfiology, but raifed the credit of natural knowledge, and fpread it as wide as Alexander’s empire. Few of Ariftotle’s writings were made public in his lifetime. He affected to fay that they would be unintelligible to thofe who had not heard them explained at his ledtures : and, ex- cept the ufe which Theophraftus made of them, they were loft to the public for above 130 years after the death of Theophraftus j and laft came out defedtive from bad prefervation, and corrupt- ed by men, who, v/ithout proper qualifications, prefumed to corredl and fupply what was loft. From the time of Theophraftus, the ftudy of natural knowledge at Athens was forever on the decline ; and the reputation of the Lycseum and Academy was almoft confined to the ftudies which are fubfervient to oratory and public fpeaking. The lO INTRODUCTION. ITe other great inftitution for Grecian edu- cation, was at Alexandria in Egypt. The firft Ptolemies, both from their love of literature, and to give true and permanent dignity to their empire, and to Alexander’s favorite city, fet up a grand fchool in the palace itfelf, with a mufeum and library, which, we may fay, has been the moT famed in the world. Anatomy, among other fciences, was publicly taught ; and the two diftinguidied anatomifts were Erafiftratus the pu- pil and friend of Theophraftus, and Herophilus. Their voluminous works are all loft ; but they are quoted by Galen almoft in every page. Thefe profeffors were probably the firft who were au- thorized to difTed; human bodies ; a peculiarity which marks ftrongly the philofophical magnani- mity of the firft Ptolemy, and fixes a great sera in the hiftory of anatomy. And it was, no doubt, from this particular advantage which the Alex- andrians had above all others, that their fchool not only gained, but for many centuries pre- ferved, the firft reputation for medical education. Ammianus Marcelliims, who lived about 650 years after the fciiools w^ere fet up, fays, they were lb famous in his time, that it was enough to fe- cure credit to any phyfician, if he could fay he had ftudied at Alexandria. Heroi^hilus has been laid to have anatomized i • 700 bodies. W e mull allow for exaggeration. Kkiy, it was faid, that both he and Erafiftratus made it a common practice to open living bodies, that INTRODUCTION. ii that they might difcover the more fecret fprings of life. But this, no doubt, was only a ^'Tligar opinion, rifmg from the prejudices of mankind ; and accordingly, without any good reafon, fuch tales have been told of modern anatomifts, and have been believed by the vulgar. Among the Romans, though it is probable they had phyhcians and furgeons from the founda- tion of the city, yet we have no account of any of thefe applying themfelves to anatomy for a very long time. Archagathus was the hrft Greek phyfician eftablifhed in Rome, and he was banifhed the city on account of the feverity of his operations. — Afclepiades, who flourifhed in Rome I o I years after Archagathus, in the time of Pompey, attained fuch a high reputation as to be ranked in the fame clafs with Hippocrates. He feemed to have fome notion of the air in res- piration acting by its weight ; and in accounting for digeftion, he fuppofed the food to be no far- ther changed than by a comminution into ex- tremely fmall parts, which being diftributed to the Several parts of the body, is affimilated to the nature of each. One Caffius, commonly thought to be a difciple of Afclepiades, accounted for the right fide of the body becoming paralytic on hurting the left fide of the brain, in the fame manner as has been done by the moderns, viz. by the croffing of the nerves from the right to the left fide of the brain. From the time of Afclepiades to the fecond centurv. 12 INTRODUCTION, century, phyficians feem to have been greatly encouraged at Rome ; and, in the writings of Celfus, Rufus, Pliny, Coelius, Aurelianus, and Arseteus, we find feveral anatomical obfervations, but moftly very fuperficial and inaccurate. To- wards the end of the fecond century lived Clau- dius Gallenus Pergamus, whofe name is fo well known in the medical world. He applied him- felf particularly to the ftudy of anatomy, and did more in that way than all that went before him. He feems, however, to have been at a^ great lofs for human fubjedts to operate Upon ; and therefore his defcription of the parts are moftly taken from brute animals. His works contain the fulleft hiftory of anatomifts, and the moft complete fyftem of the fcience, to be met with any where before him, or for feveral cen- turies after ; fo that a number of paftages in them were reckoned abfolutely unintelligible for many ages, until explained by the difcoveries of fuc- ceeding anatomifts. About the end of the fourth century, Nimefi- us bifhop of Emifia wrote a treatife on the na- ture of man, in which it is faid were contained two celebrated modern difcoveries ; the one, the ufes of the bile, boafted of by Sylvius de la Boe ; and the other, the circulation of the blood. This laft, however, is proved by Dr Friend, in his Hiftory of phyfic, p. 229. to be falfely afcribed to this author. The Roman empire beginning now to be op- prefted INTRODUCTION. 13 prefTed by the barbarians, and funk in grofs fu- peritition, learning of all kinds decreafed ; and when the empire was totally overwhelmed by thofe barbarous nations, every appearance of fcience was almofl extinguiflied in Europe. The only remains of it were among the Arabians in Spain and in Afia. — -The Saracens who came into Spain, deftroyed at firft all the Greek books which the Vandals had fpared : but though their government Wc s in a conftant ftruggle and fluc- tuation during 800 years before they were driven out, they received a tafte for learning from their eountrymen of the eaft ; feveral of their princes encouraged liberal ftudies ; public fchools were fet up at Cordova, Toledo, and other towns, and tranflations of the Greeks into the Arabic were univerfally in the hands of their teachers. - Thus was the learning of the Grecians trans- ferred to the Arabians. But though they had fo good a foundation to build upon, this art was ne- ver improved while they were mafters of the world ; for they were fatisfied with commenting upon Galen ; and feem to have made no diflec- tions of human bodies. Abdollaliph, who was himfelf a teacher of anatomy, a man eminent in his time (at and before 1203) for his learning and curiofity; a great traveller, who had been bred at Bagdad, and had feen many of the great cities and prin- cipal places for ftudy in the Saracen em.pire ; who had a favourable opinion of original obfer- vation, 14 INTRODUCTION, vation, in oppofition to book-learning ; who boldly corrected fome of Galen’s errors, and was perfuaded that many more might be detect- ed ; this man, we fay, never made or faw, or feemed to think of a human diffeCtion. He dif- covered Galen’s errors in the ofteology, by going to burying-grounds, with his ftudents and others, where he examined and demonftraced the bones ; he earneftly recommended that method of Itudy, in preference even to the reading of Galen, and thought that many further improvements might be made ; yet he feemed not to have an idea that a frefh fubjeCl might be diffeCted with that view. Perhaps the Jewiih tenets, which the Maho- metans adopted, about uncleanlinels and pollu- tion, might prevent their handling dead bodies ; or their opinion of what was fuppofed to pafs between an angel and the dead perfon, might make them think difturbing the dead highly fa- crilegious. Such, howxver, as Arabian learning was, for many ages together there was hardly any other in all the weftern countries of Europe. It was introduced by the eftablifhment of the Saracens in Spain in 7 1 1 , and kept its ground till the reftoration of learning in the end of the 15th century. The ftate of anatomy in Europe, in the times of Arabian influence, may be feen by reading a very fhort fyftem of anatomy drawn up by Mundinus, in the year 1315. It was ex- traded principally from what the Arabians had preferved of Galen’s doClrine ; and, rude as it is, in INTRODUCTION. 15 in that age, it was judged to be fo mafterly a performance, that it was ordered by a public decree, that it Ihould be read in all the fchools of Italy ; and it actually continued to be almoft the only book which was read upon the fubjedt for above 200 years. Cortefius gives him the credit of being the great reftorer of anatomy, and the firft who diffecled human bodies among the moderns. A general prejudice againft difledtion, howe- ver, prevailed till the i6th century. The em- peror Charles V. ordered a confultation to be held by the divines of Salamanca, in order to determine whether or not it was lawful in point of confcience to diffedt a dead body. In Muf- covy, till very lately, both anatomy and the ufe of fkeletons were forbidden, the firft as inhu- man, and the latter as fubfervient to with- craft. In the beginning of the 15th century, learn- ing revived confiderably in Europe, and parti- cularly phyfic, by means of copies of the Greek authors brought from the fack of Conftantinople; after which the number of anatomifts and ana- tomical books increafed to a prodigious degree. — The Europeans becoming thus pofteffed of the antient Greek fathers of medicine, were for a long time fo much occupied in corredling the copies they could obtain, ftudying the meaning, and commenting upon them, that they at- tempted i6 INTRODUCTION. tempted nothing of their own, efpecially in ana- tomy. And here the late Dr. Hunter introduces in- to the annals of this art, a genius of the firft rate, Leonardo da Vinci, who had been formerly overlooked, becaufe he was of another profeffion, and becaufe he publifhed nothing upon the fub- jedl. He is confidered by the Doctor as by far the beft anatomift and phyfiologift of his time ; and was certainly the firft man we know of who introduced the pradice of making anatomical drawings. Vaflare, in his lives of the painters, fpeaks of Leonardo thus, after telling us that he had com- pofed a book of the anatomy of a horfe, for his own ftudy : “ He afterwards applied him- felf with more diligence to the human anatomy; in which ftudy he reciprocally received and communicated affiftance to Marc Antonio della Torre, an excellent philofopher, who then read ledures in Pavia, and wrote upon this fubjed ; and who was the firft, as I have heard, who began to illiiftrate medicine from the dodrine of Galen, and to give true light to anatomy, which till that time had been involved in clouds of darknefs and ignorance. In this he availed himfelf exceedingly of the genius and labour of Leonardo, who made a book of ftudies, drawn with red chalk, and touched with a pen, with great diligence, of fuch fubjeds as he had him- felf difieded ; where he made all the bones, and 3 to INTRODUCTION. 17 to thofe he joined, in their order, all the nerves, and covered them with the mufcles. And con- cerning thofe, from part to part, he wrote re- marks in letters of an ugly form, which are written by the left hand, backwards, and not to be underftood but by thofe who >know the method of reading them ; for they are not to be read without a looking-glafs. Of thefe pa- pers of the human anatomy, there is a great part in the poifeffion of M. Francefco daMelzo, a Milanefe gentleman, who, in the time of Leo- nardo, was a mofl; beautiful boy, and much be- loved by him, as he is now a beautiful and gen- teel old man, who reads thofe writings, and care- fully preferves them, as precious relid-s, toge- ther with the portrait of Leonardo, of happy memory. It appears impoffible that that divine fpirit fhould reafon fo well upon the arteries, and mufcles, and nerves, and veins ; and with fuch diligence of every thing, &c. &c.” Thofe very drawings and the writings are happily found to be preferved in his Britannic Majefty’s great colledtion of original drawings, where the Dodior was permitted to examine them ; and his fentiments upon the occafion he thus exprelTes : “ I expeded to fee little more than fuch defigns in anatomy, as might be ufe- ful to a painter in his own profeffion ; but I faw, and indeed with aftonifhment, that Leonardo had been a general and a deep ftudent. When I confider what pains he has taken upon every B part i8 INTRODUCTION, part of the body, the fuperiority of his univer- fal genius, his particular excellence in mecha- nics and hydraulics, and the attention with which fuch a man would examine and fee objects which he was to draw, I am fully perfuaded that Leo- nardo was the heft anatomift at that time in the world. We muft give the 1 5th century the cre- dit of Leonardo’s anatomical ftudies, as he was 55 years of age at the clofe of that century.” In the beginning of the 1 6th century, Achil- linus and Benedidfus, but particularly Beren- garius and Maffa, followed out the improvement of anatomy in Italy, where they taught it, and publifhed upon the fubjedt. Thefe firft im- provers made fome difcoveries from their own diffedbions ; but it is not furprifing that they ihould have been diffident of themfelves, and I lave follovred Galen almoft blindly, when his authority had been fo long eftabliffied, and when the enthufiafm for Greek authors was rifmg to fuch a pitch. Soon after this, we may fay about the year 1540, the great Vefalius appeared. He was Itudious, laborious, a.nd ambitious. From Bruf- fels, the place of his birth, he went to Louvain, and thence to Paris, where anatomy was riot yet making confiderable figure, and then to Louvain to teach ; from which place, very for- tunately for his reputation, he was called to Italy, vrhere he met with every opportunity that fuch a fuch genius for anatomy defire, that is, books, fubjedts. INTRODUCTION. 19 fubje(?LS, and excellent draughtlinen. He was equally laborious in reading the ancients, and in dilTedting bodies. And in making the compa- rifon, he could not but fee, that there was great room for improvement, and that many of Ga- len’s defcriptions were erroneous. When he was but a young man, he publifhed a noble fyf- tem of anatomy, illuftrated with a great num- ber of elegant figures. — In this work he found fo many occaficns of correcting Galen, that his contemporaries, partial to antiquity, and jealous of his reputation, complained that he carried his turn for improvement and criticifms to licentiouf- nefs. The fpirit of oppofition and emulation was prefently roufed ; and Silvius in France, Colum- bus, Fallopius, and Euftachius in Italy, who were all in high anatomical reputation about the middle of the 1 6th century, endeavoured to de- fend Galen at the expence of Vefalius. In their difputes they made their appeals to the hu- man body : and thus in a few years the art w'as greatly improved. And Vefalius being deted;- ed in the very fault which he condemned in Ga- len, to wit, defcribing from the difl'eCiions of brutes, and not of the human body, it expofed fo fully that blunder of the older anatomifts, that in fucceeding times there has been little reafon for fuch complaint. — Befides the above, he pub- lifhed feveral other anatomical treatifes. He has been particularly fervdceable by impofmg names on the mufcles, moft of which are retain- B 2 ed 20 INTRODUCTION, cd to this day. Formerly they were diftinguifh- ed by numbers, which were differently applied by almoft every author. In 1561, Gabriel Fallopius, profeflbr of ana- tomy at Padua, publifhed a treatife of anatomy under the title of Obfervatio?ies Anatomicce. This was defigned as a fupplement to Vefalius ; many of whofe defcriptions he corrects, though he always makes mention of him in an honourable manner. Fallopius made many great difcoveries, and his book is well worth the perufal of every anatomift. In 1563, Bartholomseus Euftachius publifh- ed his Opujcula Anatomlca at Venice, which have ever fince been juftly admired for the ex- adlnefs of the defcriptions, and the difcoveries- contained in them. He publifhed afterwards forne other pieces, in which there is little of ana- tomy ; but never publifhed the great work he had promifed, which was to be adorned with copperplates reprefenting all the parts of the human body. Thefe plates, after lying buried in an old cabinet for upwards of 150 years, were at laft difcovered and publifhed in the year 1714, by Lancifi the pope’s phyfician ; who added a fhort explicatory text, becaufe Euftachius’s own writing could not be found. From this time the ftudy of anatomy gradu- ally diffuled itfelf over Europe ; infomuch that for the laft hundred years it has been daily im- proving by the labour of a number of pro- feffed INTRODUCTION. 21 •feffed anatomifts almoft in every country of Eu- rope. We may form a judgment about the ftate of anatomy even in Italy, in the beginning of the I yth century, from the information of Cortefius. He had been profeffbr of anatomy at Bologna, and was then profelTor of medicine at Maflana ; where, though he had a great defire to improve himfelf in the art, and to finifh a treatife which he had begun on practical anatomy, in 24 years he could twice only procure an opportunity of diflediing a human body, and then it was with difficulties and in hurry ; whereas he had ex- pected to have done fo, he fays, onct eve?y year, according to the ciijiom in the famous academies of Italy. In the very end of the 1 6th centry, the great Harvey, as was the cuftom of the times, went to Italy to ftudy medicine ; for Italy was ftill the favourite feat of the arts : And in the very be- ginning of the I yth century, foon after Har- vey’s return to England, his mafter in anatomy, Fabricius ab Aquapendente, publiffied an ac- count of the valves in the veins, which he had difcovered many years before, and no doubt taught in his ledures when Harvey attended him. This difcovery evidently affeded the eftabliffi- ed dodrine of all ages, that the veias carried the blood from the liver to all parts of the body for nouriffiment. It fet Harvey to work upon the ufe of the heart and vafcular fyftems in ani- mals ; 22 INTRODUCTION, mals ; and in the courfe of fome years he was fo happy as to difcover, and to prove beyond all poflibility of doubt, the circulation of tl^e blood. He taught his new dodlrine in his le^ures about the year i6i6, and printed it in 1628. It was by far the moll important Hep that had been made in the knowledge of animal bodies in any age. It not only refledled ufeful lights upon what had been already found out in ana- tomy, but alfo pointed out the means of further inveftigation. And accordingly we fee, that from Harvey to the prefent time, anatomy has been fo much improved, that we may realbna- bly quellion if the ancients have been further outdone by the moderns in any other branch of knowledge. From one day to another there has been a conftant fucceffion of difcoveries, relating either to the ftrudlure or fundlions of our body ; and new anatomical procelTes, both of inveftiga- tion and demonftration, have been daily invent- ed. Many parts of the body, which were not known in Harvey’s time, have hnce then been brought to light : and of thofe which were known, the internal compofition and fun£tions remained unexplained ; and indeed muft have remained unexplicable without the knowledge of the circulation. Harvqy’s dodrine at firft met with confider- able oppofttion ; but in the fpace of about 20 years it was fo generally and fo warmly embrac- ed, that it was imagined every thing in phyfic would be explained. But time and experience have INTRODUCTION. 23 have taught us, that we ftill are, and probably mufl long continue to be, very ignorant ; and that in the ftudy of the human body, and of its difeafes, there will always be an extenfive field for the exercife of fagacity. After the difcovery and knowledge of the circulation of the blood, the next queftion would naturally have been about the paflage and route of nutritious part of the food or chyle from the bowels to the blood-veflels : And, by good for- tune, in a few years after Harvey had made his difcovery, Afellius, an Italian phyfician, found out the la