'. .1 f;,>' .■ : ;A: DUKE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Treasure "Room i c^l ^•^ iSLX \-J PARAPHRASE yA A N D ^ N0"0:s O N T H E Epiftles of St. Paul T O T H E Galatians^ ^Romans^ \i\Cormthiam^ ^Ephejiam. To which is Prefix'd, An ESSAY F O R T H E Underftanding of St. PauPs Epistles, by Confulting St. Paul Himfelf. LONDON, Printed by J. H. for Avcnfhatn and John Churchill^ at the Bldch^Swan in Fater-mfler-Korv. 1707. I ! f'. ^..M » KbK BOOKS Written by Mr. John Lock. AN Eflay of Humane Undcrftanding, in Folio. Two Trcatifes of Government •, in the former, the falfe Principles and Foundation of Sir Robert Filmer and his Followers are deteftedand overthrown. The latter, an Eflay concerning the true Original, Extent, and End of Civil Government, ivo. Letter concerning Toleration, ^to. Second Letter concerning Toleration. 4*0. Third Letter for Toleration, to the Author of the Third Letter concerning Toleration, ^to. The Reafonablenefs of Chriftianity, as delivered in the Scriptures. Svo. Firll Vindication of the Reafonablenefs of Chriftianity. Svo. Second Vindication of the Reafonablenefs of Chriftianity. Svo; Some Thoughts concerning Education, S-z/o. Several Papers relating to Money, Intereft and Trade, Svo. Letter to Edward Lord Biftiop of Worcejier- 8 w. Reply to the Bifliop of Worcejier. ivo. Reply to the Bilhop of Wmefter's Anfwer to his Second Letter, where, be- fides other incident Matters, what his Lordlhip has faid, concerning Certainty of Reafon, Certainty by Ideas, and Certainty of Faith •, The Refurreftion of the fame Body •, The Immateriality of the Soul ^ The Inconfiftency of Mo LocFs Notions of the Articles of the '^hriftian Faith, and their Tendency to Scepticifm, is examined. Svo. f:ir! r/Hio .v1<. Digitized by \[\e internet Arciiive in 2011 witii funding from Duke University Libraries littp://wvvw.archive.org/details/paraplirasenotesoOOIock A N ESSAY FOR THE UNDERSTANDING OF PAULS EPISTLES. By Confulting St. Paul himfelf. LONDON, Printed for y^ivn/ham and Jof)n ChurchiU, at the Black Swan in Pater-noJier-Row^ ^1^7- (iii) THE PREFACE. TO go about to explain any of St. PaulV EpifiieSy after fo great a Train of Expo ft or s and Comment a-> torSy might feem an Attempt of Vanity^ cenfurabk for its heedlejfnefs^ did not the daily and approas undertaking I need make no Apology. Though 1 had been converfant in thefe Epijiles^ as well as in other Farts of Sacred Scripture y yet I found that 1 under jiood them not j [mean the doBrinal and difcurfitfe parts of them : Though the praBical Di- reSionSy which are ufuallydrop'd in the latter Fart of each Epijile, appeared to me 'very plain, intelligible, and in^ruSii've. I did net, when I refleBed on it, iJery much wonder that this part of Sacred Scripture had Difftcttfties in it^ many Caufes of Obfcurity did readily occur to me. The I^ature of Epiftolary lFritin{rs in general, difpofes the IP' r iter to pafs by the mentioning of manv Things, as well known to him to whom his Letter is addrejs'd, which are necejfary to be laid open to a Stranger, to make him comprehend what it faid : And it not fetdom falls out, that a well Fennd Letter which is 'very eafy and intelligible to the Keceii/er, is i>ery obfcure to a Stranger^ who hardly hjiows what to mak^ of A3 it. iv The PREFACE. it. The Matters that St. Paul rvnt about ^ were certawJy things well kiwrvn to thofe he writ to^ and which they hadfome peculiar Concern in, which made them eafily apprehend his Meaning, and fee the Tendency and Force of his Difcourfe. But we hazung now at this dijiance no Information of the Occaficn of his writing, little or no Knowledge of the Temper and Circumfiances thofe he writ to were in, but what is to be gather d out of the Epijiles themfel'ves, it is not Jhrangc that many things in them lie con- ceal' cl to us, which no doubt they who were concern d in ihe Let- ter underjiood at jirji fight. Add to this^ that in many places 'tis nfanifeji he anjwers Letters fent, and Quefi/ons propos'd to him, which if we had, would much better clear thoje f^affiges that relate to them, than all the learned h'otes of Criticl^s and Commentators, who in after-times fill us with their ConjeBures ; for 'very often, as to the Matter in hand, they are nothing elfe. The Language wherein thefe Epijiles are writ, are another ; and that no fmall occafion of their Obfcurity to us now The Words are Greek '■, a Language dead many A^ei fuice : A Lan- guage of a 'Very witty 'volatile Feople, Seel^ers after Nozielty, and abounding with Variety of Notions and beSis, to which they ap- plied the Terms of their common Tongue ivith great Liberty and Variety: And yet this mah^s but one f nail part of the Difficulty in the Language of thefe Lpijiles ; there is a Peculiarity in it, that much more obf cures and perplexes the Meaning of thefe Wri- tings, than what can be occafion d by the Loofenefs and Variety of the Creeks Tongue. The Terms are Greek, but the Idiom or Turn of the Thrafes maybe tndyfaidtobe Hebrew or Syriack. The Cu- Jiom and Familiarity of which TonQ^ues do fometimes fo far in- fiuence the Exprejpons in thefe Epijiles, that one may obfer've the Force of the Hebrew Conjugations, particularly that of H\p\u\ gi- 'ven to Greek^ Verbs, in a way unh^iown to the Grecians them- f elves. Nor is this all i the SubjeSi treated of in thefe Epijiles is The PREFACE. is fo wholly nerp^ ajti the Doctrines contained in them fo perfeSi- ly remote from the Notions that Manh^ind were acquainted jvith, thai mcji of the important terms in it h-i've quite another Si<^nijica- tion from what they have in other Diicourjes: So that putting ail together, ive may truly jay, that the New Tejiament is a Bool^writ- ten in a Language peculiar to it felf. 'to thefe Caiijes of Obfcnrity common to St. Paul, with moji of the other Penmen of the fei/eral Books of the New tejiament, we may add thofe that are peculiarly his, and owing to his Stile and Temper. He was, as 'tis i/ifible, a Man of qnick^ Thought, warm Temper, mighty ivell'vers'd in the Writings of the Old iejiament, and full of the DoBrine of the New: All this put together, fug- gejicd Matt er to him in abundance on thofe SubjeBs which came in his way ; So that one may confider him when he was writing, as befet with a Crowd of Thoughts, all Jiri'uing for 'Utterance. In this Fvjiure of Mind it was almofi impojpble for him to h^ep that flow Pace, and obferve minutely that Order and Method of ran' ging all he faid,ffom which rejults an eafie and ob'vioiisPerjpicui-' ty. To this Plenty and Vehemence of his may be imputed thofe many large Parenthefes which a careful Reader may obfcrz/e in his Epifiles, "Vpon this account aljo it //, that he (ften breaks off in the Middle of an Argument, to let infome new Thought fugg^fial by his own IVords ; which halving pur fmd and explained as far as conduced to his prefent Purpofe, he nuffumes again the Thread of his Difcourfe, and goes on with it, without taking any notice that he returns again to what he had been before faying, thcuijj fome- times it be fo fur off, that it ma^ well have (Jipt out of Im Mind, and requires a "very attentive Header to objerve, and fo bringthe disjointed Members together, a^- to make uptheConneSii- on, and fee how the feat terd Parts of the Dijcourje hans, toge* ther in a coherent well- agreeing Senje, that mahi it all of' a Piece. Befides vi The PREFACE. Be/ides the difii'rhance in ferujing St PaulV Epifiles^ from the Plenty and Vivacity of his Thoughts^ whiih may ob- jcure his Method^ and often hide his Senf' from an unwary^ or cuer-hafly Reader; the frequent changing of the Perfon- age he fpeaks in^ renders the ^enfe vtry uncertain^ and is apt ■ to mijlead one that has not Jome Clue to guide him ; Jome- times by the Pronoun I, he means himfelf j fometimes any Chrifiianh fometimes a Jew^ and fometimes any Man^ &c, Jf Jpeaking of himfelf in the fir ft Perfon Singular has fo ■various meanings ; his ufe of the fir ft Perfon Plural is with a far greater Latitude^ fometimes dejigning himfelf alone^ fometimes thofe with himfelf whom he makes Partners to the Epiftle ; fometimes with himfelf^ comprehending the other A- poftles^ or Preachers of the Go/pel^ or Chrifiians : Nay^ fometimes he in that way fpeaks of the Converted Jews, o- ther times of the Converted Gentiles, and fometimes of o- thers^ in a more or lefs extended Senf^ every one of which varies the meaning of the Place^ and makes it to he diffe- rentiy underftood. I have forborn to trouble the header with Examples of them here. If his own Obfervation hath not already furni/hed him with them^ the following Paraphrafe and Notes I fuppofe will fatisfie him in the point. In the current alfo of his Difcourfe.^ he fometimes drops in the Obje&ions of others.^ and his Anfwers to them^ without any Change in the Scheme of his Language., that might give Notice of any other [peaking be fides himfelf. This requires great Attention to ob/erve.^ and yet if it be mgle&ed or over- look'd.^ will make the Reader very much miflake.^ and mifun^ derftand his Meanings and render the Senfe very perplex'' d. Tueje are intrinjick difficulties arijing from the Text it felf rphereof there might be a great many other named.^ as the un^ certaintyy fometimes^ who are the Perfons he fpeaks to^ or the Opinions The PREFACE. vii Opinions or Pra&ices xvhich he has in his Eye^ fometimes in aUuding to them^ fometimes in his Exhortations ami Rtproofs. But thofe above mentioned being the chiefs it may fuffice to have opened our Ejes a little upon them^ which, well ezamind^ may contribute towards our Difcovery of the refi. To thefe we may fubjoyn two external Caufes that have made nofmaU increafe of the Native and Original Dijfficulties that keep us from an eafie and ajjurd Difcovery of St. PaulV Senfe^ in many parts of his Epiftles^ and thofe are^ Fir^^ The dividing of them into Chapters and Verfes^ as we have done^ whereby they are fo chop^d and minc'd^ and as they are now Printed^ fiand fo broken and divided., that not only the Common People take the Verfes ufiially for diftintf A- phorifms^ but even Men of more advanced Knowledge in read- ing them, lofe very much of the flrength and force of the Co- herence, and the Light that depends on it. Our Minds are fo weak and narrow, that they have need of all the helps and affiances can be procurd^ to lay before them undijiurbedly^ the Thread and Coherence of any Difcourfe ; by which alone they are truly improved and lead into the Genuine Senfe of the Author. When the Eye is conftantly difturKd with looje Sentences.^ that by their ftanding and feparation, appear as fo many diftinSl Fragments ; the Alind will have much ado to take in.^ and car- ry on in its Memory an uniform Difcourfe of dependent Rca- Jonings, efpecially having from the Cradle been ufed to wrong Impreffions concerning them, and conftantly accHftom''d to hear them quoted as diftinSi Sentences^ without any limitation or ex- plication of their precife Meaning from the Place th--y ftand in^ and the nelation they bear to what goes before.^ or follows. Thefe Drvifions aljo have given occafion to the reading thefc Epifi Us by parcels ami in fcraps., which has farther confirm'^d the E'vil arifing from fach partitions. And I doubt not but every viii The PREFACE. every one mv// confejs it to be a 'very wdih^ely rr>ay to come to the Z)?jder]ia7idi?ig of any other Letters^ to read them Peice- meal^ a Bit to day^ and another Scrap to morrow^ andfo on by broken [ntcr'vah ; Efpecially if the Faufc and Cejfatiou fhoiild be made as the Chapters the Apojlles €pr(l/es are dihatfoei/er. If Tully'x Epi flies were fo printed^ and fo ujedy I ask^n hither they would 7iot be much harder to be undcrflood, icjs eafy and lejs plcafant to be read by much than now they are ? How plain foevcr this Abufe is^ and what Prejudice foever it does to the 'Vnderflanding of the Sacred Scripture^ yet if a Bible was printed as it fljould be, and as the fever al Parts of it xvere writ, in continued Difcourfes where the Argument w continued, I doubt not but the fe'veral Parties would complain of it, as an Inno'vation, and a dangerous Change in the pub' li^j-ing thofe holy Books. And indeed thofe who are for main- taining their Opinions, and the Syflcms of Parties by Sound of Words, with a "Negledl of the true Senfe of Scripture, would ha've reajon to make and foment the Outcry. They would mojl of than be immediately dijarm'd of their great Maga'zine of Artillery wherewith they defend themjel'ves, and jail ttpon others, if the Holy Scripture were but laid before the Eyes of Chriftians in its due Conne5iion and Confifiemy, it would not then be Jo eajy to jnjtch out a few I Fords, as if they were fepa- rate fiom ihe r.fl, to jerve a Purpoje, to which they do not at all belong, and with which they ha've nothing to do. But as the matter now flands, he that has a wind to it, may at ^d cheap rjte be a notable Champion for the 1 ruthy ttjat js, for the Do- 5iri ines The PREFACE. ix Brines rftbe Scff that Chance or Interefl has caft him into. He ne^d but he furnilhtd with Vtrfes of Sacred Scripture^ containing Words and Erpreffions that are but flexible (as all general ob- fcure and doubtful ones are) and his Syftem that has appropria- ted them to the Onhodorie of hi/s Churchy makes them immedi- ately firong and irrefragable Arguments for hU Opinion. This U the Benefit of loo e Sentences^ and Scripture crumbled into Verfes^ which quickly turn into independent Aphorifms. But If the QjxOtation in the Verfe ptoduc^d^ were confider'd as a part of a continued coherent F'ifcourfe^ and jo its Seufe were limited by the Ttnour of the Context^ mo§} of thefe forward and warm I)if put ants would be quite (Iripd of thofe^ which they doubt not now to call Spiritual Weapon s^ and they would have ofttn nothing to jay that would not Jh.w their Weaknefs^ and manifejily fly in their Faces. I crave leave to fet down a Saying of the Learned and '^uJiciom Mr. Selden, " In interpreting the " Scripture^ fays k-^ many do as if a Man fJjould fee one have " Ten Founds^ which he re^kpn^d by i , a, ^, 4., 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, " 10. meaning Four was bt<: four V nit es.^ and five jive V~ '' nites^ &c and that he had in all but Ten Pounds : The " other that fes hiii^ tales not the Figures together.^ as he doth^ but picks here and there ; and thereupon reports that " he had five Pounds in one Bag^ and fix Pounds in another " Bag^ and nim Pounds in another Bag^ &c. when as in *■' truth he has but ten Pounds in all. So we pick out a Text *' here and there.^ to make it jerve our turn ; whereas if we take " it altogether.^ and con fidtr what went brfore.^ and what fol- " lowed after .J we /hould find it meant no f'tch thing, i have heard fober Chrijiians very much admire why ordinary illiterate People.^ who were Profejfors.^ that flotxod a Concern for Religi- on^ feem'd much more converfant in St. VauVs EpijiUs.^ than inthe plainer.^ and as it jeem^d to them much more intelligible a Parts X The PREFACE. Parts of the New Teftament ; They confejjed that thd* thev read St. Paul'j Epiftleswith their beU Attention^ yet they generally found them too hard to be mafterd^ and they labour''d in uain (o far to reach the Apoftle's Meaning all ilong in the Train of what he [aid ^ as to read them with that SatUfa&ion that arifes from a feeling that we under ft and and fully corner ih mi the Force and Reasoning of an Author', and therefore they could not imagin what thofe faw in them^ whofe L\es they thought not m'lch bet- ter than their own. But the Cafe was plain^ Thefe foher in- q-'ifitive Readers had a mind to fee nothing in St. Paul'i £p/- ftles but jii§i what he meant; whereas thofe others of a guicker and gayer Sight could fee in them what they pleajed. N-Ahiiig h more acceptable to Phanfie .ban plyant Terms and E.rpreJ/ions that are not objiinate^ in fiich it can find its account with De- light^ and with them be illuminated.^ Orthodox^ infallible at pleafur?^ and in its ownvpay. But where the Senfe of the Au- thor goes ui/ibly in its (^la^n Train^ and th.' Words.^ receiving a determined Senfe from their Cor pinions and A Ijacents^ will not confent to give Countenance an i Colour to what is agreed to hi' right.^ and muft be fupported at anyrate.^ there Men of eftj^ blijh\l Orthodoxie do not fo well find th ir SatUfaciion. And perhaps if it were well examind.^ it worild be no very extrava- gant Paradox to fay ^ that there are fewer thit bring their Opi- nions to the Sacred Scripture to be tried by that infallible Rule^ than bring the Sacred Scripture to their Opinions^ to bend it to them^ to make it as they can a Cover and Guard of them. And to this Purpofe its being divided into Verfes.^ and brought as much OA may be into loofe and general Aphorifms.^ makes it mo^ ufeful and ferviceable. And in this lies the other great Caufe of Obfcurity and Pcrplexednefs^ which has been ca§l upon St, Paul'j Epifiles from without. St. The PREFACE. xi St. VnuVs Epijilef, as they ftand tranflated in our Etiglijh Bibles^ are non> by long and conjiant Z^fe become a pan of the Engiifh Language^ and common Phrafeology, efpecially in Mat' ters of Religion j this ei/ery one ufes familiarly, and thinh^s he underjiandsy but it mufi be obferved, that if he has a di(iin6i meaning when he ufes thofe Words and Phrafef, and h^nows him' felf what he intends by them, it is alway according to the Senfe of his own Syjiem, and the Articles or Interpretations of the So^ ciety he is engaged in. So that all this Knowledge and 'Under' fianding which he has in the %)fe of thefc Faffages of Sacred Scripturi', reaches no farther than this, that he l\nows (and that is oidably to all but one of the dij^erent Syfiem Si in all thofe Faffages that any way relate to the Foints in Controijerpe between them. This is a Mif chief which^ however frequent and almoH na- tural, reaches fo far, that it would jiffily make all thofe who depend upon them, wholly diffident of C omwentators, and let them fee, how little Help was to he expeSied from them in rely- ing on them for the true Senfe of the Sacred Scripture, did they not tak^ care to help to coi^en themfel'ves, . by choofing to ufe and pin their Faith on ftuh Expofttors as explain the Sacred Scripture in fa'vour of thofe Opinions that they before-hand hai>£ (voted Or- thodox, and bring to the Sacred Si rtpture not for i rial, but Con- firmation. No body can thinl^that any lext of St. PaulV Epi- a 2 pijiles xii The PREFACE. pijiles has two rorptritry Meanings ^ and yet [ok mujl ha've to two diff^crent Men^ who fal^h/g two Commcrtators of di^^rcnt ScBs for their rcfpeSiiz'c Guides into the Senfe of any one of the Epi- filcs^ fha/l huild upon their rejpeSii've Expofnions. We need go no further for a Proof of it. than the Notes of the two Ce- lebrated Commetttators on the "New hjijfncnt^ Dr. Hammond and Bcza, both Men of Parts and Learnings and both thought by their Followers Men nnghty in the Sacred Scriptures. So that here we fee the hopes of great Benefit and Light from Ex- poftors and Commentators .^ w in a great part abated.^ and thofe who ha've moH need of their Htdp, can recei've but little from them, and can ha've 'very little Affurance of reaching the Apo- jiUs Senfe by what they fnd in them, whiiji Matters remain in the fame State they are in at prefent. For thofe, who fnd they need Help, and would borrow Eight from Expofitors, ei- ther confult only thofe who ha've the good luch^to be thought found and Orthodox, a'voiding thofe of dijferent Sentiments from them- fel'ves i?i the great and approved Points of their Syflems, as dan{ie.roHf and not ft to be medled with ; or elfe with Indiffe- rency lool\ into the Notes of all Com>nentators promifcnonfly. the frU of thefe taks Pains only to confirm themfel'ves in the Opini- ons and Tenents they have already^ which whether it be the way to ours^ as to thinh^it worth while to be informed, what was the Clue I guided my felf by through all the dari^ Faffages oftheje Epiflles^ 1 ^jall minutely tell him the Steps by which I wcps brought into tlm way, that he ■ may judge whether I proceeded rationally, upon right Grounds or no, if jo be tstiy thingin fomean an Example as mine may be worth his notice. After I had found by long Experience, that the reading of the Text and Comments in the ordinary way proi^ed not fo fuccefsful as I wifh'd to the end propos'd^ I began to jujpeB that in reading a Chapter as was ujual, and thereupon jometimes confultii/g Ex- pofitors upon fome hard Flaces of it, which at that time moU af- feSiei me, as relating to Feints then under Conjidcrat/on in my own Mind, or in Debate amongli others, was not a right ^iethod to get into the true Senfe of thefe Epiflles. I faw plainly, after I began once to refleB on it, that if any one now fjoidd write me a Letter, as long as St. Paul'/ to the Romans concerning fuch a Matter as that is, in a Stile as Foreign, and Expreffions as du- bioHS as his feem to be, if I fhould dwide it into ff teen or fixteen Chapters, and read of them one to day^ and another to mor^ row, &c. it was ten to one I fmdd nei/er come to a full and clear Comprehenfion of it. The way to under fland the Mind of him that writ it, e'uery one would agree, was to read the whole Letter through from one end to the other, all at once, to fee what was the main SubjeSl and Tendency of it : or if it had fe'veral Views and Furpofes in it, not dependent one of another, nor in I The PREFACE. xv in a Subordination to one chief Aim and End^ to difccver what thoje different Matters werCj and tvhere the Author con- cluded one^ and began another ^ and if there were any Necef- Jity of di'viding the Epijile into Parts^ to fnake the Boundaries of them. In Profecutim of this Thoughty I concluded it neceffary^ for the und tjianding of any one of St. FaulV Eptftles., to read it all through at one Siting.^ and to ebjer've as well as I could the Drift and Defign of his writing it. If the frji readu g gaje in writing the Epifile^ the chief Branches of his Dijco rye wherein be prosecuted it^ the Arguments he «- jed. a:d the Dijpofition of the whole. Tis^ I confejs^ w n t to be obtained by one or two hajiy Readi'gs ^ it muji be repeated again and again^ with a clufe At tint ton to the Tenour of the Dijcourje^ and a perfeSi Ne- glcB of the Di'viftons into Chapters and Ferfes. On the con- trary., the jafeji way is to jttppoje, that the Epifile has but one tufiKcfs., and tne Aim., till by a frequent Per ujal of it ^ you are forced to jee there are dijiinSi independent Matters in ity which will forwardly enough fhew themjel'ves. It requires jo much more Paws .^ Judgment and Application.^ to find the Coherence of objcure and abftruje Writings ^ and makes them jo much the more unfit to jeri>e Prejudice and Pre-occupation when found^ that it is not to be wondered that St. Paul/ l:pijiles have with many p a jfed rat her for disjointed ^ loofe pious DijcourjeSy full of Wor/ith and TLeal^ and O'ver- flows of Light y rather than for calm jirongcoherent Keajenings^ that carried a Thread of Argument and Conjijiency all through them. But xvi The PREFACE. But this vmttenng of I jx.)/ or ill di pojed Kea'Jcrs^hin-^ered hie not from perfijii>7g in the Courfe I had bsgan , i coiitinued to read the jame tpiJlL oi/er ando'ver^and O'ver again ^ till I came to difcover^ a^ appeared to me^ what n\i.f the Drift and Aim of it^ and by what Steps and Arguments St. Paul pro- jecnted his Purpoje. 1 remembred that St. Paul was mira- culoujly called to the Mimjlry of the Gojpcl^ and declared to be a chojen Vejfel ;, that he had the rvh le DoSirine of the Cofpel from Cod by immediate Ke'velation^ and was appoin- ted to be the Apojile of the Gentiles, for the propagating of it in the Heathen // orld. This war enough to perjwade me^ that he was not a Man of looje and fJjattcred Parts^ uncapa- hie to argue., and u tft to conjelcfs^ in a jumbled and con fujed Head , nor ha've laid up juch a Store of admirable and ujeful Knowledge in a Man, who for want of Method and Order, Clearnejs cf Conception, or Pertinency in Dijcourfe, could not draw it out into Z^fe with the greateji Adi^antages of Force and Coherence. That he kiiew how to profuute his Purpofe with Strength of Ar- gument and cloje Keaj ning, without incoherent tallies, or the intermixing of things foreign to his bufinejs, was ees in the next Verfe, and in other places. But tho Foliteneff of Language^ Delicacy of Stile ^ Finenefs of Exprejp- on, laboured Periods, artifcial 7ranfitions, and a 'very methodical ranging of the Parts with fitch other Imbelli/lw/ents as make a Di- fcourfe enter the Mind fmoothly^ and flrike the Phanfie at frji hear- ings ha've little or no place in his Stile, yet Coherence of Difcourfe^ ancladireSi Tendency of all the Parts of it, to the Argument in handy are moft eminently to be found in him. 1 his I take to be his Chara- Ber, and doubt not but he will be found to be fo upon diligent £x« amination. And in this if it be fo, we have a Clue, if we will take the Pains to find it, that will conduB us with Surety through thofe feemingly darli^ Places, and imagined Intricacies in which Cbrijiians have wander' d fo far one from another, as to find quite contrary Senfes. Whether a fuperficial Reading, accompanied with the common- Opinion of his invincible Obfcurity, has k^pt off fome from fetlqng in him the Coherence of a Difcourjc tending with clofe fiiong reafoning to a Point ', Or a feemingly more honourable Opinion of one that hud been wrafd up into the Third Heaven, as if from a Man fo ivarm'd and illuminated as he had been, nothing could be expc6ied but lla/hes of Light, and Raptures of Zeal, hinder d others to look for a I rain of Reafoning, proceeding on regidar and cogent Argumentation from a Man rais'd above the ordinary pilch of humanity to an higher and brighter way of Illumination ', Or elfe whether others were loth to beat their Heads about the Tenor and Coherence in St. PaulV Difcour/es, which if found out, pojpbly might Jet him at a manifeji and irncon- lileable The PREFACE. xix cikahle Dij^erence with their Syflems^ 'ti^ certain that rvhate'ver hath been the Cattje, this way of getting the true Scnfc of St. Paul'/ EpiJileSy feems not to ha've been much made ufe of, or at leaH fo throughly purfited as I am apt to think^it defer'ves. For-, granting that he was full jicrd with the Knowledge of the things he treated of : For he hud light from Hea'ven, it was God bimjelf furnifhed him., and he coidd not want : Allowing alfo that he had Ahiiity to make ufe of the Knowledge had been gi'ven him for the end for which it was gi'ven him., viz. the Information., Con- 'vidiion., and Converfvm of others ; and accordingly that he kf^cw ho7V to dire5t his Dijconrje to the Point in hand., we cannot nidely mijial^e the Parts of hk Difcourje imployd about it., when we ha've any whe^e found out the toint he dri'ves at : U here ever we ha've got a View of hts Pefi^n., and the Aim he propofed to himfelf in Writing., we may be fure that juch or fttch an Interpretation does not gienuine Senje, it being nothing at all to his prefent purpoje Nay an'ong 'variotts' Meanings gi'ven a Text, it fails not to direti us to the beji, and 'very often to affure us of the true. For it is no frefunipiion, when one fees a Man arguing for this or that tropofit/on, if he be a fober Man, Majier of Keafon or common Senfe, and takes any care of what he fays, to pronounce with Con- jidence in fe'veral Cafes, th,it he could not talk thus or thus. 1 do not yet fo magnifie this Method of fludying St. PauIV Fpi- files, as well as other tarts of Sacred Scripture, as to think 'twill per* feSily clear every hard Place, and leave no Doubt unrefol-ved. I h^now Exprefpons now out of ufe. Opinions of thofe times, not heard of in oitr days, Allufwns to Cu flunks !oJi to us, and various Circum- fiances and Particulariti s of the Parties, which we cannot come at, &c. mtiji needs continue jei'eral Pajfagcs in the dark, now to us at this diflance, whiih fl.'On iiith full Light to thojc they were diteSied to. But for all that ti e jiudying of e therefore faid that 7ve fhould compare together Places of Scripture treating of the jame Point. Thfts indeed one part of the Sacred Text could not fail to give light unto another. And fince the Profidefice of Cod hath fo order d it., that St. Paul has writ a great Number of Epifiles^ which tho upon diff^erent Occafions^ and to federal Puipojes^ yet are all confined within the Bufinefs of his Ap)jilefhipy and fo contain tiothing but Points of Chrijii- an InJiruBion.y amongU which he jeldom fails to drop in, and often to inlarge on the great and dijiinguijhing Doctrines of our holy Religion :, which., if quitting our own Infallibility in that Analogy of Faith which we have nrade to our jel'ves, or ha've im- plicitly adopted from fome other, we would carefully lay togC' ther, and diligently compare and Jiudy, I am apt to thinh^would gi've us St. Paul'/ Syfiem in a clear and indifput able Senfe, which e'very one muji ackfiowledge to be a better Standard to interpret his Meaning by, in any olfcure and doubtful Parts of his Epijiles^ if any juch fJjould fiill remain, than the Syfiem, Confefpon, or Articles of any Church or Society of Chrijiians yet k^own, which however pretended to be founded on Scripture, are vifibly the Contrivances of Men (^fallible both in their Opinions and Inter- pretations) and as is vifble in mofi of them, made with partial Views, and adapted to what the Occafions of that time, and the prejent Circumfiances they were then in, were thought to require for the Support or Jufif cation of thcmjelves. Their Philojophy alfo hits Its part m mij-leading Men from the true Senje of the Sacred Scripture. He that Jhall attentively read the Chrijiian ^Fri' xxii Tfe'^P^lEFAeE. Writers after the Age of the Apoflles^ will cafily jind hotv much the Phil jophy they n>ere tinSinred n>ith^ influenced then; in their 'Vnde. fiandt?j^of the Books if the Old and New Tejiawefit. In the Agtis wherein PJatonijm prei/ailed^ the Converts to Chrijiia- mty of that School^ on all occafions, interpreted Holy Writ ace r- ding to the Notions they had imb>hd from th.tt Philofophy. Ari- ftotie' s Do6ir me had the jame effeti in its tttrn^ aad when it de- generated into tlye PeripJteticijm of the Schools^ that too brou(r^ht Its Notions and Diftin6iioas into Di'vinity\ and affixed then/ to the Terms of the Sacred Scripture. And we max jee ftill how atthis day every ones Philojophy regulates e'vcry ones Interpreta- tion of the It ordof God. 'Ihoje who arc poffeffed with t,jc Do- Slrine ef Aerial and Mthcrial Vehicles., ha've thence borrowed an Interpretation of tlje tour frji Veries of 2 Cor. :; without ha-- 'ving any Ground t > thinh^that St. Paul had ti-e leaji Notion of 'any juch FehicLs.'Tis plain thafth: teaching of Mai Philofophy^ was no part of the Defign &f Di'vim Ke-velation ; but that the Exprejfions of Scripture are commonlv juited in thole Matters to the Vulgar Apprehenfions and Conceptions of the Place and Peo- ple where they were deliifered. And as to the DoSirine therein direSily taught by the Apofiles^ that tends wholly to the feting up the Kingdom of J ejus Chriji in this World., and the Salz>a- tton of Mens Souls .^ and in this 'tis plain their Fxpreffions were conformed to the Ideas and Notions which they had received front Revelation., or were confequent frum it. We p-^all therefore in vain go about to interpret their Words by tie Notions of our Philojophy., and the DoSirines of Men deliver d in our Schools, This is to explain the Apojiles meaning b\ w jat they never thought of whilfi they were writing.^ which is not tue way to Jind their Senle tn what they deliver'd^ but our own., and to tai^e up from their Writings not what they left there for us\ but what we bring aLng with us m our j elves. He that would under jiand St, The PREFACE.' xxiii St. Paul rtght., mitft under jiand his Terms in the Senje hi ufes them^ and not OA they are appropriated by each Mans particular Philof^phx'^ to Conceptions that ne'uer entered the Alindof the Apo- flle. For Example^ he that /hall brin^ the Philofophy now taught and receii/d to the explaining of Spirit, Soul, and Body, men- tioned I Theff. 5^:?. voill i fear hardly reach St. Paul'j Senfe^ or reprefint to himfelf the Notions St. Paul then had in his Mind. That is what we fijould aim at in reading him., or any other Author .^ and ^till we from his Words paint his 'Very Ideas and Thoughts in our Minds., we do not underjiand him. In • the Divijions I haue made^ 1 have indea'vour d the be§i I could to ^^ovirn my felf by the Diver fit y of Matter. But in a Wri- ter like St. Paul, it is not fo eafie always to find precifely where one Suh'jeB: ends., and another begins. He is full of the Atatter he treats and writes with Warmth.^ which up.ially negle&s Mfthody and thofe Partitions and Paiifes whith At n eduated inth Schools of Rhetoricians ufualty obfeyve. Thofe Arts of Writing St. Paul, as well out of Dejign as Temper.^ wholly laid by : The Shb'jetl he had in hand.^ and the Grounds upon which it ftood firm^ and by which he inforced it., was what alone he minded^ and without fo- lemnly winding up one Argument., and intimating any way that he began another., let his Thought s.^ which were fidly pvffefs'd of th& Matter., run in one continued Train., wherein the Parts of his Dif" courfe were wove one into another. So that it is feldom that the Scheme of his Difcourfe makes an\ Gap; and therefore without breaking in upon the Conneclion of his Language., ^tis hardly pcjfible to feparate his Vifcouif,'.^ and give a dijiin& View of his feveral Argument^-. in difiinid e&ijns. I am, far from pretending Infallibility in the Senfe I have any where given in my Paraphrafe or Not^s }, That would be to ereSi my felf intci an Apolile., a Prefiaiption. ef the highefi Nature in any one that cannot confirm what he fays by Miracles. I have for my own Information fought the true. Meaning as far as my poor A- bilities xxiv The PREFACE. bilities would reach. And I have unbiajfedly imbraced rvhat upon a fair Enquiry appear d fo to me. Thi/, I thought my Duty and Interest in a Matter of fo great Concernment to me. If I mu§i be- lieve for my felf^ it k unavoidable that 1 mu§i imderfiand for my felf. For if I blindly and with an Implicit Faith take the Pope^s Interpretation of the Sacred Scripture., without examining whether it be Chrifi's Meaning.^ ^tU the Pope I believe in., and not in Chrifl ; Vm his Authority I re^ upon ; 'tis what he fays I imbrace : For what "'tis Chri§l fays^ I neither know nor concern my felf. ^Tis the fame thing when I fet up any other Man in Chrifl' s place., and make him the Authentique Interpreter of Sacred Scripture to my felf. He may po/J/bly underhand the Sacred Scripture as right ds any Man.^ but I Jhall do well to examin my felf., whether that which I do not know.^ nay {which in the way I take) I can never know., can jufii- fie me in making wv felf his Difciple^ infiead of Jefus Chri§i., who of hight is alone and ought to be my only Lord and Mafer : and it will be no lefs Sacrilege in me to fubftituteto my felf any other in his room.^ to be a Prophet., to me., than to be my King or Prieii. The fame Reafons that put me up n doing what I have in thefe Papers done.^ will exempt me from all S/ffpition of impojing mv In- terpretation on others. The Reafons that lead me into the Meaning -which prevailed en my Mind., are fet down with it.^ as far a& they carry Light and ConviBion to any other Alans Zlndsrftanding^ fo far I hope my Labour may be of fome Vfe to him., beyond the Evi- dence it carries with it^ I advife htm not to follow mine.^ nor any Man's Interpretation- ^Ve are all Men liable to Errors.^ and in- fe^ed with them ; but have this fure way to prefer ve our fehes every one from danger by them., if laying a fide Sloth, Careleffnefs.^ Prejudice.^ Party., and a Reverence of Men^ we betake our fives in earned to the Study cf the way to Salvation^ in thofe holy Wri' tings wherein God hoA reveafd it from Heaven., and proposed it to the Worhf fet: king our Religion where we are fure it is in Truth to he found., comparing fpiritual things with fpiritual things. PARAPHRASE AND NOTES ON T HE EPISTLE of St. ?K\JL T O T H E GALATIANS. %\\t Xl)irD €lJit!OU» LONDON: Printed for William Churchill at the Black Swan in Pater-nojier-row. 1 7 1 8. THE PUBLISHER TO T !i E READER. THere is nothing certainly of greater Concernment to the Peace of the Church in general^ nor to the Dire&ion and Edification of all Chriflians in particular^ than a right Vnderftan- ding of the Holy Scripture. This Confideration has fet fo many learned and pious Men amongji us of late Tears upon Ezpo/iti-' ons^ Paraphrafes and Notes on the Sacred Writings ; that the Author of thefe hopes the Fajhion may ezcufe him for endeauour- ing to add his Mite^ believing^ that after all that has been done by thofe great Labourers in the Harvefl^ there may be fome Glea* nings left^ vphereof he prefumes he has an Inftance^ Ch. III. 'uer, 10. and fome other Places of this Epiftle to the Galatians, rvhich he looks upon not to be the hardefi of St. Paurj. If he has given a Light to any obfcure Paffage^ he fhaJl think his Pains well em- ploy d : If there be nothing elfe worth notice in him^ accept of his good Intention- A 2 THE 5; THE EPISTL E of St. PAUL Writ from Eptitfus, the Tear of _ ear Lord T O T H E ,7. c^f iNero 3, . A L A T I A N S, s r N T S 1 s. THE Subjed and Defign of this Epiftle of Sr. Paul is much the fame with that of his Epiftle to the Romans^ but treated in fomewhat a different manner. The Bufinefs of it is to dehort and hinder xht GaUtians fvom bringing themfelves under the Bondage of the Mofaical Law. St. Paul himfelf had planted the Churches ofGalatia, and therefore referring (as he does Ch. I. 8, 9.) to what he had before taught them, does not in this Epiftle lay down at large to them the Dodrine of the Gofpel, as he does in that to the Romans, who having been converted to the Chriftian Faith by others, he did not know how far they were inflruded in all thofe Particulars, which, on the occafion whereon he writ to them, it might be neceliary for them to underftand. And therefore, writing to the Romans, he fcts before them a large and comprehenfive View of the Chief Heads of the Chriftian Religion. He alfo deals more roundly with his Difciples the G/ilatians, than, we may obferve, he does with the Romans, to whom, he being a Stranger, writes not in fo familiar a Style, i?or in his Reproofs and Exhortations ufes fo much the Tone of a Mafter, as he does to ihs Galatians. St. Paid had converted the Galatians to the Faith, and eredcd fc- veral Churches among them in the Year of our Lord 51, between which, and the Year 57, wherein this Epiftle was writ, the Disor- ders following were got into thofe Churches. 6 GALATIANS. Chap. I. Tirft^ Some Zealots for the ''jeroijh Conftitution, had very near per- *^^'^/'^^ fuaded them out of their Chriftian Liberty, and made them vviHing to fubmit to Circumcifion, and all the ritual Obfcrvancesof the Jev-^ iff) Church as necefFary under the Gofpel : Ch. I. 7. III. 3. IV. 9, io,» 21. V. !, 2, 6,g, 10. SeconJl)\ Their DifTentions and Difputes in this Matter, had raifcd great xA-nimofitiesaraongfl them, to the difturbance of their Peace, and the fetting them at Strife one with another : Ch. V. 6, 1 3 1 5. The reforming them in thefe two Points feems to be the main Bufi- nefs of this Epillle, wherein he endeavours to eftablifh them in a Re- folution to (land firm in the Freedom of the Gofpel, which exempts them from the Bondage of the MofaJcal Law : And labours to reduce ihem to a fincere Love and Affeftion one to another 5 which he con- cludes with an Exhortation to Liberality, and general Beneficence, efpecially to their Teachers 5 Ch. VI. 6, 10. Thefe being the Matters he had in his Mind to write to them about, he feems here as if he had done. But upon mentioning v. 1 1. what a long Letter he had writ to them with his own Hand, the former Argument concerning Circumci- fion, which filled and warmed his Mind, broke out again into what we find, V. 12 17. of the Vlth Chapter. S E C T. 1. CHAP. I. I 5. IntroditElion. CONTENTS. THE general View of this Epiftle plainly /hews St. P^iiiPs chief Defign in it to be,to keep the Galatians from hearkning tothofe Judaizing Seducers, who h^d almofl perfuaded them to be Circumcifed. Thefe Pcrverters of the Gofpel of Chrifl, as St. Paul liimfclf calls them, V. 7. had, ^s may be gather'd from v. 8, and 10. and from Ch. V. 1 1, and other Padages of this Epifile, made the Galatians believe that St. Paul himfclf was for Circumcifion. Till St. Paul himfelf had fet them right in this matter, and convinced them of the Fal- Giood of this Afperfion, it was in vain for him by other Arguments to attempt GALATIANS. attempt the re-eflablifhing the Galatians in the Chriflian Liberty, and Chap. i. in that Truth which he had preached to them. The removing therefore ^-^'"^ of this Calumny was his firft Endeavour 5 and to that purpofe this In- troduflion, different from what we find in any other of his Epiftlc', is marvelloufly well adapted. He declares here at the entrance very ex- prefly and emphaticslly, that he was not fent by Men on their Er- rands ^ Nay, that Chrill in fending him did not fo much as convey his Apoftolick Power to him by the Miniltry, or Intervention of any Man ; but that his CommifTion and Inftrudions were all intirely from God, and Chrift himfelf, by immediate Revelation. This of it felf was an Argument (ufficient to induce them to believe, i. Thnt what he taught them when he firft preached the Gofpel to them, was the Truth, and that they ought to flick firm to that. 2. That he chan- ged not his Doftrine, whatever might be reported of him. He was Chrift s chofen Officer, and had no dependance on Men's Opinions, nor regard to their Authority, or Favour, in what he preached 5 and therefore 'twas not likely he fhould preach one thing at one time, and another thing at another. Thus this Preface is very proper in this Place to introduce what he is going to fay concerning himfelf, and adds Force to his Difcourfe, and the account he gives of himfelf in the next Section. TEXT. PARAPHRASE. , pA F L an Apo«ie (not j^^ jj L (an Apoflle not of Men f^J to ferve I of men, neither bv 1-^ ^u ; c j „ .. ..i- r» V man, but by jefus JJ their Ends,or Carry oti their Defigns,nor re- Chrift , and God the ceiving his Call, or CommifTion by the interven- &m"fro„,"'the dead' tionof any Man C^)to whom he might be thought to owe any refped, or deference upon thnt ac- count; but immediately from Jefus Chrift, and from God the Father, who raifed him up from NOTES. 1 (a) OJx itr ii^ejnrui, not of Men, i. c. not fent by Men at their Pleafure, or by thefr Authority ; nor inftrufted by Men what to fay or do, as we fee Timothy and Titus were when fent by St. Paul ; and Judat and SiJiu fent by the Church of ^erufaUm. (b) Ovi\ li' dy^igiTTu, nor by Mam, i. e. His Choice and Separation to his Miniftry and Apofllefliip, was fo wholly an Aft of God, and Chrift, that there was no Intervention of any thing done by any Man in the Cafe, as there was in the Eleftion of Matthias, All this we may feeexplain'd atlarge, V. 10— 12. andv.16,17, and Cb, II. 6«i . . 9. the 8 Chap. 1. GALA TIANS. PARAPHRASE. TEXT. 2. the Dead') nnd all the Brethren that are with mc, unto the Churches (0 of G^/^rirf.- Favour be 3. to you, and Peace (J) (roin God the Father, and 4. from our Lord JerusChrilt,who gave himfeJf for our Sins, that he mic,ht take us out of this prefent evil Woild, (d") according to the Will and good ■5. I'leafure of God and our Father, to whom be Gloiy for ever and ever. Anietu NOTES. And all the brethren 2 which are with me unto the Churches of Gala- tia ; Grace be to you, j and Peace from God the Father, and from our Lord Jefus Chritt : Who gave himfelf for ^ our lins , that he might deliver us from this prefent evil world, ac- cording to the will of God and our Father. To whom be glory for 5 ever and ever. Amen. 1 (t) Churches -f Gslatia. This was an evident Seal of his Apoftlefliip to the Gentiles j (ince in no bigger a Country than Galatia, a fma 11 Province of the LeflervJ/ja, he had, in no long liay among them, planted feveral dirtinft Churches. 3 li) react. The willing of Pt^aire in the Scripture- Language, is the wiftiing of all man- tier oi Good. 4 (e) ''O'jra; SE,im1ou ijutif c« T? Ims'cot^ cdi!v®- •ortDHfa. That he might takl m out of thit prefent evil IVcrld, or Af!,c, fo the Greek Words fignife. Whereby it cannot be thought, tli.it St. Vaul meant, that Chridians were to be immediately removed into the other World, Therefore iifrjr«-c«'«v mult (ignihe fomething elfe than p'efent IVorld, in the ordinary Im- port of tbofe Words in Englid). AlavsT^, I Cor. 2. 6, 8. and in other Places plainly (ig- ' nifes the Jewi fl] N ation, under the \lofaical Conllitution ; and it fuits very well with the Apollle's Uedgn in tliis Epillle, that it fl:ould do fo here. God has in this World but one "XingdoiTi, and one People. The Nation of the Jews were tlie Kingdom and People of God, whilll the Law Hood. And this Kingdom of God under the Mofaical Conftitution Tvascnlled «-, thit Ap/i or as it is commonly tranflated, thitWorli, to which ou'i'v 'r^'S-2;i the prefent Wcrli, or y?^ff, here anfwers. But the Kingdom of God, which waste •be under the Mtdi.ih, wherein the Oeconomy and Conftitution of the jffiT///; Church, and the Nation it felf, that in oppolition to Chrilt adhered to it, was to be laid afide, is in the Nev; TeRament called ojJi f^Mav, the World, or Jge to ccnie ; fo that Chrift's taVing them ■cut "f the prefent ll'orld, may, without any Violence to the Words, be underllood to lignihe his fetting rhem free from the Mofiical Conllitution. This is fuitable to the Delign ot this Epillle, and whn Si. Faul has dec!:ired in many other Places. SeeO/.H.i^ — 17, and 20. which agrees to this pl.ice, and Rom. VII. 4. 6. The Law is faid to be contrary to us, Col. II. 14. and to work Wrsth, R tn. IV. 1 ■;, and St. Paul fpcaks very diminiftiingi)- of the ritual part? of it in many places : But )et if all this may not be thought diflicientto juilifie the JDplvingot' the Epithet cjonip?, Evil^ to it, th.it Scruple will be removed, if we take c/verc',- cu'i'i', this prefent IfVrl/, here, for the JennJJ) Conllitution and Nation together, in which "Senfc it may very well be called F.vil, tho' tlie Apollle, out of hi.s wonted Tenderneis to his Nation, forbears to name them openly, and ufcs ;< doubtful E.vprertion, which might cotn- Wtehend the "Heathen World alio, tho' he chiefly pointed at the Jetvs. SECT. GALATIJNS. 9 Chap. 1. SECT. IL "-^^ CHAP. I. 6 II. 2 1. CONTENTS. WE have above obferved, that St. Paul's firft Endeavours in this Epiftle was to {^nsfie the Galatians, that the Report fprcad of him, that he preached Circumcifion, wasfalfe. Till this Obftrudi- 011, that lay in his way, was removed, it was to no purpofe for him to go about to difTuade them from Circumcifion, though th it be what he principally aims at in this Epiftle. To (hew them that he promo- ted not Circumcifion, he calls their hearkening to thofe who perfua- ded them to be circumcifed, their being removed from him ^ and thofe that fo perfuaded them, ?erverters of theGofpelsf Cbrift^ v. 6, 7. He farther afTures them, thnt the Gofpel which he preached every where was that, and thit only, which he had received by immediate Reve- lation from Chrift, and no Contrivance of Man, nor did he vary it to pleafe Men ; That would not confifl: with his being a Servant of Chrift, V. 10. And he exprefTes fuch a firm Adherence to what he had received from Chrift, and had preached to them, that he pro- nounces an Anathema upon himfelf, v. 8, 9. or any other Man or Angel, that (hould preach any thing elfe to them. To make out this to have been all along his Condud:, he gives an Account of himfelf for many Years backwards, even from the time before his Converfion. Wherein he (hew?, that from a zealous perfecuting Jew, he was made a Chriftian, and an Apoftle by immediate Revelation, and that ha- ving no Communication with the Apoftlcs, or with the Churches of Jwlea, or any Man for fome Years, he had nothing to preach, but what he had received by immediate Revelation. Nay, when fourteen Years after he went up to Jerufalem, it was by Revelation^ and when he there communicated the Gofpel, which he preach 'd amon^ the Gftttiles, Peter^ James^ and John approved of it without adding any thing, but admitted him as their Fellow Apoitle. So that in all this he was guided by nothing but Divine Revelation, which he in- flexibly ftuck to, fo far, that he openly oppofed St. Peter for his Ju- daizingat Antioch. All which Account ot himfelf tends clearly to (]iew^ that St. Paul made not the leait ftep towards complying with the J'ews in Favour of the Law, nor did out of regard to Man, devi- B ate lo G ALATI ANS. C^-p- I- ate from the Doflrine be had received by Revelation from God. ^^■'""^^'^^^ AH the Parts of thisSeclion, and the Narrative contained in it, nn- n\^t[\\y concenter in this, as will more fully appear, as we go through th^:m, and take a clofer view of them, which will (hew u? tiiat the whole is fo skilfully man.iged, and the Parts To gently flid into, that it is a ftrong, but not feeiningly labour'd Juftification of hiuifelf, from the Imputation of Preaching up Circumcifion. TEXT, I Marvel that ye are fo foon removed from him that called you in- to the grace of" Chrilf, unto another gofpel : Which is not another ; but there he fome that trouble )ou, and would pervert the gofpel of FAR APHRASE, I Cannot but wonder that you are fo foon (f) re- move d from n"ie,(^i^) (who called you into the Covenant of Grace which isinChrift; unto ano- ther fort of Gofpel -^ which is not owing to any thing elfe,(/?) but only this, that you are troubled by a certain fort of Men, who would overturn the Gofpel of Chrift, by making Circumcifion, and the keeping of the Law necellary (i^ under the NOTE S. 6 (f) So foon. The firft place we find GaUtia mentioned is AUs XVI. 6. And there- fore St. Paw/ may be fuppofed to have planted thefe Churches there, in his Journey men- tioned, Aiis XVI. which was Anno Domini 51. He vilitcd them again, after he had been at ycrufalem, Afts XVIII. 21 23. An. Dom. 54. From thence'he returned to Epkefus, and ftaid there about two Years, during which tinip this EpiiHe was writ, fo that counting from his laft Vifit, this Letter was writ to them within two or three Years from the time he was lait witb them, and had left them confirmed in the Doarine he had taught them, and therefore he might with Reafon wonder at their forfaking him fo foon, and that Gofpel he had converted them to. (£) From him that called yea. Thefe Words plainly point out himfelf. But then ore might wonder how St. ?au\ came to ufe them ; fince it would have founded better to have faid Removed from the Gofpel I preached to you, to another Gofpel, than removed from me that prea^ (hed to you, to another Gofpel. But if it be remembred that St. Paul's Delign here is to vin- dicate himfelf from the Aiperfion caft on him, that he preached Circumcifion, notbifig could be more iuitable to that purpofe, than this way of cxprefling himfelf. 7 f /) ) "O B K Uit oi'mo- I tske to fignifie, which i« not any thing elfe. The Words themfelves the Context, and the Bulmefs the Apo(Ue is upon here, do all concur to give thefe Words the Senfe 1 have taken them in. For, i. If"0 had referred XalvAyy'iua^^ it would have been more natural to have kept to the word »T«yf and not have changed it into awo. 2. It can fcart« be fuppofed by any ene who reads what St. ?auI fays, in the following Words of this Verfe, and the two adjoyning •, and alfo Ch. HI. 4. and Ver. 2 —-4, and 7, That St. Vaul fliould tell them, that what he would keep them from, it not another Gofpel. 3. It is fuitable to St. Paufi Defign here to tell them, that to their being removed to another Gofpel, no body tlfe had contributed, but it was wholly owing to thofe Judaizing Seducers. (ij See AUsXW. 1,5, 23,24. Gofpel. G ALATIANS. TEXT. PARAPHRASE. 8 Chrift. But though we or an angel from hea- ven preach any other go- fpel unto you, than that which we have preached unto you, let him be ac- 9 curled. As we faid be- fore, to fay I now again, if any man preach any other gofpel unto you than that ye have recei- ved, let him be accurfed. to For do I now perfuade men, or God ? or do I feek to pleafe men ? for if I yet pleafed men, I (hould not be the fervant 11 of Chrift. But I certifie you, brethren, that the gofpel which was prea- ched of me, is not after 8. Gofpel. But if even I my feIf,or an Angel from Heaven fliould preach any thing to you for Go- fpel, different from the Gofpel 1 have preach 'd unto you, let him be accurfed. I fay it again 9. to you, if any one, under pretence of the Gofpel, preach any other thing to you thin what you have received from me, let him be accurfed (k). For can it be doubted of me, after having done and fuffer'd fo much for the Gofpel of Chrifl, whe- ther I do now (I) at this time of day make my court to Men, or feek the favour (;;j) of God > If I had hitherto made it my Bufinefs to pleafe Men, I fhnuld not have been the Servant of Chrift, nor taken up the profefiion of the Gofpel. But I cer- tifie you,Brethren,that the Gofpel which has been NOTES. 9 ft) Accarfei. Tho' we may look upon the Repetition of the Anathema here to be for the adding of force to what he fays; yet we mayobferve, that by joyninghimfelf with an Angel in the foregoing Verfe, he does as good as tell them, that he is not guilty of what de- ferves it, by skilfully inlinuating to the Galatians, that they might as well fufpeft an Angel might preach to them a Gofpel different from his, i.e. a falfe Gofpel, as that he himfelf (hould ; and then in this Verfe lays the Anathema wholly and folely upon the Judaizing Seducers. 10 (/) "AfTi now, and 'in yet, cannot be underllood without a Reference to fjmething in St. Paul's part Life ; what that was which he had particularly then in his Mind, we may fee by the account he gives of himfelf in what immediately follows, i/>. That before hisCon- verlion he was employ 'd by Men in their Deligns, and made it his bufinefs to pleafe them, as may be feen, AUs IX. 1,2. But when God called him, he received his Commiffion and Inftruftions from him alone, and fet immediately about it without confulting any Man what. foever, preaching that, and that only, which he had received from Chrift. So that it would be fenfelefs Folly in him, and no lefs than the fbrfaking his Mafter Jcfus Chrift, if he fhould now, as was reported of him, mix any thing ofMens with the pure Doctrine of the Gofpel, which he had received immediately by Revelation Irom Jefus Chrift, to pleafe the ^eivs, after he had fo long preached only that ; and had, to avoid all appearance or pre- tence to the contrary, fo carelully fliun'd all communication with the Churches of ^uiea; and had not til! a good while after, and that vt-ry fparingly, converfed with any, and thole but a tew of the Apoftles themfelves, feme of whom he openly reproved for their Judaizing. Thus the Narrative fubjoyn'd to this Verfe explains the nato and jiet in it, and all tends to the fame purpofe. (m) HeiSii) tranflated perlwaie, is fometimes uled for making application to any one to ob- tain his good Will or Friendflup, and hence y4.'7i 12,20. wfiVix>?(f BMtVof is tranflated lia- virg made Tilaflm their Friend; The Senfe here is the fame which the i Thejf 2. 4. heex- prelies in thefe words, e';^ cJ>- iy'iifjmoii a'fia)tov?6> etvi* tw Qiu, not as plea/ing Men but God. 10. IT. B every !2 CliJ.p. I. G JLJTIJNS. 'PARAPHRASE. TEXT. every where («) preac bed by me, is not fuc li as is pl'ant to h'linatie Interen",orcan beaccoininoila- 12. tei^ to t!ie pli^afin^ of M n. (For I neither recei- X'ed it from Man, nor was I taught it by any one ashisScIiohir) but it is the pure and unmixed im- mediate Revelan'oii of Jcfus Chrift to me. To 1^. fatisfie Nou of this my Ijehu'iour, vvhilft I was of thejeu'ifh Religion, is fo well known, that I need not tell you, how exceflive violent I was in Fer- fecuting the Church of GoJ, and deftro)ed it all 14, I could 5 and that being carried on by an extra- ordinary Zeal for the Traditions of my Forefa- thers, I out-flripp'd many Students of my own 15. Age and Nation, in "JuJaifin. Bur when it plea- fed God (who feparated (0) me from my Mot he r's \Vo;iib, and by his efpecial Favoir called (/?) me to be a Chrifiian, and a Preacher of the Gofpel) i5. toreveil his Son tome, that I might preach him among x\\tGentiles, I thereupon applied nor my In felftoany Man (^) for advice what to do (r): Nei- ther went 1 up to 'JentfaleWj ro rhofc who were A po files before me, to fee whether they approved my Doftrine, or to have farther Inftrudions from NOTES. II (n) ToUin^yiM^'iiua'i/nx, lohicb hig been preached by me : This being fpoken indefi- nitely, muil be underrtood in general every where, and lb is tlie import of the forcgoine Verle. 15 (0) Separated. This may be underftood by jfer. I. ^. (p) Called. The Hiftory of this Call, fee Ms I X. i. iSc. 16 (q) fkjh and Bloid, is ufed for Man, fee Eph. VI. 12. (.r) i\r advice : This, and what he fays in the following Verfe, is to evidence to the Galatians, the full Afl'urance he had of the Truth and Perlciftion of the Gofpel, which he bad received from Chrill by immediate Revelation ; and how little he was difpofed to have any regard to the pleating ot Men in preaching it, that he did not fo much as communicate 01 advife with any of the Apoftles about it, to fee whether they approved ot it. man. For I neither re- 12 ceived it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the Revelation of Jefus Chrilf. For ye have heard 1 3 of my converl'ation in time paff, in the Jews religion, how that be- yond meafure I perfecu- ted the Church of God, and wafted it : And pro- J4 hted in the Jews religi. on, above many my c- quals in mine own nati- on, being more excee- dingly zealous of the tra- ditions of my fathers. But when it pleafed God 15 who feparated me from my mother's womb, and called me by his grate, To reveal his Son in me, jg that I might preach him among the heathen : immediately 1 conferred not with fieffi and blood : Iseither went I up to Je- ,7 rufalem, to tiicm which were Apoftles before me, Init I went into Arabia, and returned again unto them : QALATIANS. TEXT. PARAPHRASE. i8 Damafcus. Then after three )ears I went up to Jenifdlem to fee Peter, and abode with him fif- 19 teen da^s. But other of the apolUes faw I none, fave James the Lord's 20 brother. Now the things which I write unto you, l^hold, before God, I 21 lie not. Afterwards I catne into the regions of llSyui and Cilicia : And was unknown by face unto the churches of Judea, which were in 23Chrilt, But they had heard only. That he which perfecuted us in times pal>, now preach- eth the faith which once he 2A dellroyed. And they glo- rified God in me. 17 0) EJSfitos-, imtnediauly, tho' placed juft before «' and la^acivtJ.'^iZui, I conferred not, yet it is plain by the Senle and Defign of St. Paul here, that it principally relates to, / roent inio Arabia; his Departure into jtfraWa, prefently upon his Converfion, before he had con- lulted with any body, being made ufe of, to /hew that the Gofpel he had received by im- mediate Revelation from Jefus Chrift, was complcat, and fufhciently inftrufted and ena- bled him to be a Preacher and an Apoftle to the Centilet, without borrowing any thing from any Man, in order thereunto, no not with any of the Apoftles, no one of whom he faw till three Years after. 18 («) Tiree Tears, i.e. from his Converfion. 22 (u) In Chrifl, i.<. Believing in Chrifl, ke Horn. 16.7. (vo) This which he fo particularly takes notice of, does nothing to the proving that he was a true Apoitle, but ferves very well to fhew, that in what he preached, he had no Commu- •nication with thofe of his own Nation, nor took any care to plcafe the jfewf. 18. them : Butlwentinimecliarely (s) unto Arabia^ and from thence returned again to Dam a feus. Then after thrte Years (0 1 went up to Jerufahm., to fee Peter.,Ani abode with him fifteen days. But other of the Apolfles ffiw I none but James^^xh^ i9> Brotherof our Lord. Thefe things thati write 20. to you, IcallGodtowitnefs, arealltrue ^ there is no FaKhood in them. Afterwards 1 came into the Regions of .Syrirt andOIicM. But with the Churches of Chrift (^u) in Judea, I had had no Communication, they had not fo much as feea my Face (wX only they had heard that I who formerly perfecuted the Churches ofChrifl, did now preach the GyfpeJ, which I once endeavou- red to fupprefs and extirpate. And they glori- fied God upon my account. ?/ r £ 5. 21. 22, 2?. 24. CHAP H Chap. ir. GALATIANS. CHAP. II. I. 2. 3. ? ARATHRASE. THen foiirteen years after I went up again to Jgrufalem with Barnabas, and took Titus alfo with me. And I went up by Revelation , and there laid before them the Gofpel which I (jf)preached to the G^nf?/iv(t>)tti.'o&n is rightly trandated, -WM not compelled, a plain Evidence to the G<«. Utians, that the circumcifing of the convert Gentiles was no part of the Gorpel which he laid before thefe Men of Note, as vvhat he preach'd to the Gentiles. For itit had, Jitiu mu(i have been circumcifed; forno part of hisGofpel was blamed or altered by them, wr. 6. Of what other ufe his mentioning this of Titui here can be, but to flicw to the Galatians, that what he preach'd contain'd nothing of circumcifing the convert Ge»«j/M, it is hard to find. If it were tofhew that the other Apoftles and Church at jfer«/K Ti- tus compelled; nor did we yield to them a moment. ~ (cj Tn ■(jwWf. bySub]e[lim. The Point thofe falfe Brethren contended for was. That the Law! of Mo/w was to be ke^ t, fee ^fli i<;. <;. St. ;><»«/, who on other Occafions was fo ^^ fomplaifant, that to the Jens he became as a jew, to thofe under the Law as under the Law^ (fee I Cor. 9. i ; 22.) yet when Subjeaion to the Law was claimed as due in any cafe, he | would not yield the leaft matter ; this 1 take to be his meaning of «JJ «'E,af/J5u T>T-csr!Ta>ir,^ for where compliance was defired of him upon the account of Expedience,andnot ot Subjeftion to the Law, we do not find him ftiff and inflexible; as may be (ten Alls 21. 18— 26. which was after the writingof this Epil^le. (ij Bonding. What this Bondage was, ieeA^t \<,. I. <, 10. V. CC'do Truth i' re of Repu- tation, and juftly efteem'd to be Pill.iis, percei- ving that the Gofpel which was to be preached to the Gentiles., was committed to me, as that which was to be preach'd to the jfervs ^ was com- NOTES. (i) Every hody fees that there is fomething to be fupplied to make up the Senfe ; moll Commentators that I have feen add thefe Words ; / learned nothing. But then that enervates the Reafon that follow;; ; For in conference they added ndhiiig to me ; giving the fame thing as a Reafon for it ielf, and making St. Paul talk thus ; / learnt nothing if them ; for they taught me nothing. But it is very good reafoning, and fuited to his purpofe, that it was nothing at all to him, how much thofc great Men were ibrmerly in ChriIVs Favour : This hinder'd not but that God who was no Refpefter of Perfons, might reveal the Gofpel to him alfo ; as 'twas evident he had done, and that in its full Perfeftion. For thofe great Men, the moll eminentof the ApolHes had nothing to add to it or except againll it. This was pro. per to perfiiade the Gatatians, that he no where in his preaching receded from that Doiftrine of Freedom from the Law,which he had preached to them ; and was fatisfied it was the truth, the Difliculty is removed ; and St. Paul having in the foregoing Verfe ended the Narrative of his Deportment towards the Falfe Brethren, he here begins an Account of what palled between him and the Chief of the Apoftlcs. 7 (it) Peter, James znd John, who 'tis manifeft by ner. 9. are the Perfons here fpoken of, feem of all the Apoftles to have been moft in El>eem and Favour with their Mailer during his Converfation with them on Earth. See Mark i^. ^jy. & 9. 2. & i 4. 33. " But yet that " fays St. Paul, is of no moment now to me. The Gofpel which I preach, and which God " who is no Refpefter of Perfons, has been pleated to commit to me by ijnmediate Reveh- »' lion, is not the lefs true, nor is there any reafon for mc to recede from 'it in a Tittle. For " thefe Men of the firll Rank could find nothing to add, alter, or gainfay in it. This is fui- table to St. Paul's Delign here, to let the Galatians fee that as he in his Carriage had never favour'd Circumcilion, lb neither had he any rc.ifon by preaching Circumcifion to forfake the Dovtrine of Liberty from the Law ; which he had preached 10 them as a part of that Gofpel which he had received by Revelation. mit- i8 CTiap. IT. GALATIANS. PARAPFIRASE. TEXT. 8. 10. II. wrought effeiftually in Pe- g ter to the apolllefliip of the circumcilion, the fame was mighty in me towards the G(rn»//f^}.And when James, g Cephas, and John, who fccmed to be pillars, per- ceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands ot fcllowlhip ; that we fliould go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcilion. Only the) jq would that we /liould re- member the poor ; the fame which I alfo was forward to do. But when Peter was n mitted to Peter. (For he that had wroup;ht powerfully f /Jin Peter to his executing theOffice of ;in Apoftle to the Jeivs, had alfo v.rought powerfully in me in my Application and Apoftjc- fliip, to the Gentiles). And knowing (^rii) the Fa- vour that was bellowed on me, gave me and Bar- fi.zl'as the right Hand fw) of Fellow fliip,that we fliould preach the Gofpel to the Gentiles^nnd they to the Children of Ifrael. All that they propofed was, that wefhonld remember to make Collecti- ons among the Gentiles for the poor Chriftians of 'JtiJea,v,'hkh was a thing that of my felf 1 was forward to do. But when Peter came to Antioch I openly oppofed (p) him to his Face. For indeed he Is' OT E S. 8 0) 'Evsfj-KtTijif, working in, may be underftood here to fignife both the Operation of the Spirit upon the Mind of St. Peter and St. Paul, in fending them, the one to the ^cws the o- ther to the Gentiles ; and alfo the Holy Gholl beftowed on tlieni, whereby they were enabled to do Miracles tor the Confirmation of their DoArine. In neither of which St. Pa«/ as he Ihews, was inferior ; and lb had as Authentick a Seal of his Miflton and Doftrine. ' 1} im) Kou and, copaUt.es yiiyns knowing, in this Verfe, with I'io'iTef/ee/W ve'r. 7. and makes Ijothof them to agree with the Nominative Cafe to the Verb eloAavfavc, which is no other but James, Cephas and John ; and fo juftifies my transferring thofe N.imes to ver. 7. }or the more ealie Conftruftion and LJnderftanding of the Text; tho' St. Pau/ defers the na- ming of them till he is, as it were, againll bis Will forced to it before the end ofliisDifcourfe (n) The giving the right Hand was a Symbol amongli the Jews, as well as other Nati- ons, of Accord, and admitting Men into Fellowfhip. II (0)1 ifpofed. him- From this Oppofition to St. Peter, which they fuppofe to be before the Council at Jerufalem 5 fbme would have it that this Epilfle to the Calatians was writ before that Council ; as if what was done before the Council could not be mentioned in a Letter writ i'";er the Council. They alfo contend, that this Journey mentioned hereby St. P«a 1? ^uttfj-fA^, Tk Truth cf the Gofpel is put here for that freedom from the Law of Mofes, which was a part of the true Doarine of the Gofpel. For it was in nothing elfe but their undue and timorous obferving fome of ihe Mcfaical Rites, that St. Pa«/ here blames St. Peter, and the other Judaizing Converts it Antioch. In this Scnfe heufcs the word Trutfc, all along thro' this EpilUe, as C/;. 1 1. 5, l+. & 3. i. & 5. 7. inlilUng on it, that this Doftrine of freedom from the Law, was the true Gofpel. T'j (^) ^vaii'laicuoi, Jews by 'Nature. What the y^w thought of thcmfelves in contra- diftinftion to the Centiks, See Rom. 2. i?, 23. C 3 by come to Antiocb, I with- flood him to the face, be- caufe he was to be blamed. For before that certain came from J:imes, he did eat with the Gentiles : but when they were come, he withdrew, and feparated himfelf, fearing them which were of the circum- , cifion. And the other ^Jews diffembled likewife with him ; infomuch that Barnabas alfo was carried away with their diffimu- '*lation. But when I faw that they walked not up- rightly, according to the truth of the gofpel, I faid unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, liv- efl after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compelleil thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews ? We who 'are Jews by nature, and not finners of the Gentiles, ^Knowing that a man is not julHhed by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jefus Chrifl, even we have believed lat 20 Chip. II. G ALATIANS. PARAPHRASE. TEXT. *7. ^18. 19. in JeHis Chrifl ; that we might be julHfied by the faith of Chrift, and not by the works ol the law : for by the works of the law rtiall no fiefli be juftified. But it while 17 we jt'ck to be jultified by Chrift, we our lelves alio are fbund finnerSj is therefore Chrift the niinifter of fin ? God forbid. For if I build 18 again the things which I deftroyed, I make my felf a trapfgreffour. For '9 f through the law am dead to the law^ that by Faith in Chrift, and not by the Works of the Law : But if we feck to be juRified in Chrift, even we our fclves alfo are found unjuftified Sin- ners (rj, (for fuchare all thofe who are under the Law, which admits of no Remifiloii nor Juftifi. cition) is Chrid therefore the Minilter of Sin } Is the Difpenfation by him a Difpenfation of Sin, and not of Righteoufnefs ? Did he come into the World, that thofe who beheve in him fhould flili remain Sinners, i. e. under the Guilt of their Sins, without the benefit of Juftification.> By no means. And yet certain it is, if I (jj who quitted the Law, to put my felf under the Go- fpel, put my felf again ui;dcr the Law, I m-ike my felf a I'ranforclTor, I re- affume again the Guilt of all my Tranfgreffions : which by the Terms of that Covenant of Works, I cannot be juftified from. For by the it) tenor of the Law it felf, I by Faith in Chrift am difcharged (u) NOTES. 17 (r) Sinners. Thefe who are under the Law, having once TranfgrelTed, remain al- ways Sinners unalterably fo in the Eye of the Law; which excludes all from Jultification. The Apoftle in this pLice .irgues thus; " We ^ews, who are by birth God's Holy Peo- " pie, and not as the profligate Gentiles, ahandon'd to all manner of pollution and unclean- *' nefs, not being nevertlielefs able to attain Righteoufnefs by the deeds of the Law, have " believed in Chrill, that we might be juftified by Faith in him. But if even we who have " betaken our felves to Chrift for JulHhcation, are our felves found to be iinju!lified Sirrers, " liable ftill to Wrath, as alfo under the Law, to which we fubjeft our felves ; what deli- " verance have we from Sin by Chril^ ? None at all : We are as much concluded under Sin " and Guilt, as if we did not believe in him. So that by joyning him and the Law to- " eether for Juftification, we fhut our felves out from Juttification, which cannot be had " under the Law, and make Chrift the Minilter of Sin, and not of Juftihcation, which «' God forbid 18 (s) Whether this be a part of what St. Paul faid to St. Peter, or whether it he addref- fed to tiie Galatians, St. Paul, by fpeaking in his own Name plainly declares, that if he fets up the Law again, he muft neceffaril,' be an Offender; whereby he ftrongly inlinuates to thj O iliiians, that he was no Promoter of Circumcifion, efpecially when what he fays, Ch. 5. 'i \- is added to it. 19 it) By the tenor of the Lav) 't felf. See Rotn. 3. 21. Gal 3. 24, 2<;. & 4. 21, CJc. («) Being difchargei from the Law, St. Paui exprefles by Vead. 10 the Law, compare Rom. <. 14. with 7. 4. from 1 G AL ATI ANS. T EXT. PARAPHRASE. I might live unto God. I •) to God, and live acceptably to him in his King- dom which he has now fet up under his Son. I a Member of Chrifl's Body am crucified (a-) with him, but tho' I am thereby Dead to the Law, I neverthelefs Jive, yet not I but Chrifl: Jiveth in me, i. e. the Life which I now live in the Flefii, is upon no other Principle, nor under nny other Law, but that of Faith in the Son of God (^), who loved me, and gave himfelf for me. And in fo doing I avoid fruftrating the Grace of God, Laccept of the Grace (s:-) andForgivenefsofGod, as it is offered through Faith in Chrift in the Gofpel : But if I fubjed my fclf to the Law, as ftill in force under the Gofpel, I do in effed fru- ftrate Grace. For if Righteoufnefs be to be had by the Law, then Chrift died to no purpofe, there was no need of it (a). NOTES. (to) Live 10 God. What St. Paw/ fays here, feems to imply, that livingunder the Law, was to Tve rot .icceptablv to God ; a itrange Docftrine certainly to the ^ews, and yet it was true now under the Gofpel. For God having put his Kingdom in this World wholly under his Son, when he rnifed him from the dead, all who after that would be his People in his Kingdom, were tu live by no other Law, but the Gofpel, which was now the Law of his Kingdom. And hence we fee God caft off the ^ems, becaufe Ricking to their old Conftitu- tion, they would not have this Man reign over them : So that what St. Paul fays here, is in effeft this. " By believing in Chrift, I am difcharg'd from the Mofaical Law, that I may «' wholly conform my felf to the Rule of the Gofpel which is now the Law, which muft be *' owned and obferved by all thofe w no, as God's People, will live acceptably to him'. This I think isviliblyhis meaning, though tlie acculloming himfelf to Antithefes may poflibly be the rcafon why, after h.iving faid, J am dead to the £arv, he exprefles his putting himfelf under the Gofpei by Living to God. 20 fx) Crucified with Chrifl, See this explain'd Row.7. 4. and 6.2 14, (y) i.e. The whole management of my felf is conformable to the Doftrine of the Gofpel of Juflit^cation :n Chrift alone, and not by the Deeds of the Law. 1 his and the former Vcrie feems to be fpoken in oppofition to St. Peters owning a Subjedion to the Law ofMofes, by his Walking mentioned v. 14. 21 ix) Grace of God, See Ch.1. 6,7. to which this feems here oppofed. («) In vain. Read this explain'd in St. Pai^rs own Words, Ch. 5.3. - ■•6. 20. 21, SECT, 02 Chap, III. GALATIANS. SECT. III. CHAP. III. I — 5. CO N T E N T S. I. .2. 2. BY the Account St. Paid has given of himfelf in the foregoing Se- dion, the Gdattans being furnifhed with Evidence fufficientto clear him in their Minds from the Report of his preaching Gircuracifi- on, he comes now, the way being thus open'd, diredlly to oppofe their being circumcifed, and fubjecling themfelves to the Law. The firft Argument he ufes is, that they received the Holy Ghoft,and the Gifts of Miracles by the Gofpei, and not by the Law. TEXT, OFooliffi Galatians , who hath bewitched you, that you (hould not obey the truth , before whofe eyes Jefus Chrift hath been evidently let forth, crucified among you ? This only would I learn of you , Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law , or by the hearing of faith ? Are ye fo fooliih ? Having TARAPHRASE. OYefoolifiiG^tei^nj,whohathcaftaMifl:be- fore your Eyes, that you fhould not keep to the Truth {b) of the Gofpei, you to whom the Suf- ferings and Death of Chrift {c) upon the Crofs, hath been by me fo lively represented, as if it had been actually done in your fight > This one thing I defire to know of you, did you receive the mira- culous Gifts of the Spirit, by the Works of the Law, or by the Gofpei preach'd to you ? Have you fo little Underftanding,that having begun in the Reception of the Spiritual Doftrine of the Gofpei, you hope to be advanc'd to higher degrees NOTES. 1 (i) Obey the Truth, i. c Stand faft in the Liberty of the Gofpei, Truth being ufed intliis Epiftleas v/e have already noted,C/j. 2. 14. for the Doftrine of being free from the Law, which St. Paul had delivered to th?m. The Reafon whereof he gives Ck. 5 3 5. (c) St. Paul mentions nothing to them here but Chrijf Crucified, as knowing that when for- jnerly he had preached Chrift crucified to them, he had /hewn them, that by Chrift's Death on the Crofs, Believers were fct free firom the Law, and the Covenant of Works was remo- ved to make way for that of Grace. This we may find him inculcating to his other Gentile Converts. See Eph. 2. !■;, 16. Col. 1. 14, ao. And accordingly he tells the Galatians, Ch. 5. 2,4. that if by Circumcifion they put themfelves under the Law, they were fallen from Grace and Chrift fliould profit them nothing at all. Things which they are fuppofed to un- derftand at his Writing to them. of GALATIANS. TEXT. PARAPHRASE. begun in the fpirit, are ye now made perfeft by the flefh ? Have ye fuffered fo many things in vain ? If it be yet in vain. He there- fore that miniftreth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith ? nf Perfeftion, nnd to be compleated by the Law (d) } Have you fuffered fo many things in vain, if at leaft you will render it in vain, by fal- ling off from the Profeffion of the pure and un- corrupted Dodrine of the Gofpel, and Apoflafi- fing to Judaifm? The Gifts of the Holy Ghoft that have been conferr'd upon you, have they not been conferred on you asChriftians,profeffing Faith m Jefus Chrift-, and not as Obfervers of the Lrw ? And hath not he (e) who h.ith convey'd thefe Gifts to you, and done Miracles amongft you, done it as a Preacher and ProfcfTor of the Gofpel, the jFifipj who ftick in the Law of Mofes^ being, not able by virtue of that to do any fuch thing ? NOTES. 3 (d) It is a way of fpeaking very familiar to St, Paul, in oppofing the Law and the Go- fpel, to call the Law fkjh, and the Gofpel Spirit. The Reafon whereof is very plain to any one converfant in his Epiftles. 5 (e) He. The Perfon meant here by o iirv^^yteii hi that minifireth, and Ci. i. 6. by o xttAvVctf, he that called, is plainly St. Paul himleU, though out of Modefty he declines na- ming himfelf; SECT. IV. CHAP. III. 6-— 18. CONTENTS. HIS next Argument againfl Circumcifion and Subjedion to the Law, is, that the Children of Abraham^ entitled to the Inhe- ritance and Bkfling promifed to Abraham and his Seed, are fo by Faith, and not by being under the Law, which brings a Curfe a^on thofe who are under it. But 24 C p. I IT. GALATIANS. PARAPHRASE. T E XT. 6' "But to proceed. As Ah abarn believed in God, and it was accounted to him for Righteoufnefs^ So 7. know ye, that thofe who are of Faith, i. faith iky. Bat the Law fays not fo, the Law gives not Life to thofe who believe (/):but the Rule of the Law is,^,? thatJoth 35. themfljalllivL' in thern(m).Qh.n^ hath redeemed us from the Cuife of the Law, being tnade a Curfe for us.For it is written (n) Citrfed is every one that ?!^. han^eih on a 3>i?^.That the Blefling (o)promiftd NOTES. Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accoun- ted to him for righteouf- nels. Know )e therefore, 7 that they which are of Faith, the fame are the Children of Abraham. And the Scripture forefee- 8 ing that God would jufti- fie the Heathen through faith, preached betore the gofpel unto Abraham, fay- ing, In thee fliall all nati- ons be ble/Ied. So then 9 they which be of faith are blefied with faitlUul -Vbra. ham. For as many as are lO of the works of the law, are under the curfe : for it is written , curfed is every one that continueth not in all things which are writ- ten in the book of the law to do them. But that no n man is juftified by the law in the light of God, it is e- vident: for the juft fjiall live by faith. And the law jj is not of faith , but, The man that doth them fliall live in them. Chrift hath redeemed us from la 8 (f) Gen. 12. j. 9, 10 (g; Of Faith, diTiA of the WorliS of the l.a-m. as the genuine Polkrity of Abraham, Heirs of the {h) Bkfjii, and under the Curfe. Heie again there is another Vivifcn (viz.) into the Spoken as of two Races of Men, the one Promife; the other not. Uleffei, and thofe under the Curfe ; whereby is meant fuch as are in a Stati' of Lite, or accep- tance with God ; or fuch as are cvpofed to his Wrath, and to Death. See Vcttt. 30. 19. JO fO Written Deut. 27.26. 11 a) Iiab.2.^. 12 (I) See jiBs 13. 39. 13 (n) Deut. 21. 7->,- 14. io) Blefftng. That Blefling, v. 8, 9, 14. Judilication, v. 1 1 ' Righteoufnefs, v. 21. Life, i;. 11,12, 21. Inheritance, t;. i 8. Being the Children of God; v. 26. areineffeftall the fame on the one fide: And the Curfe, v. 1 3. the direft contrary on the other fide ; (o plain in5t. Vaul's Difcourfe here, that no body who reads it with the leail attention will be in any -doubt about it. 10 GALAT IJNS. TEXT. PARAFHRASE. 25 ch, iir. to Abraham might come on the Gentiles throUj*h Jefus Chrift ^ that we who are Chriftians might, beJicving,Tecei\ ethe Spirit that was promis'd (/?). Brethren, this is a known and allowed Rule in humane Affairs, that a Promife or Compad, thu* it be barely a Man's Covenant, yet if it be once ratified, fo it muft ftand, no Body cnn render it void,or make any Alteration in it. Nowto^^^^-tf- ham and his Seed were the Fromifes made. God doth not fay,<»«^^o S^^r/2jb* "V". ^H' "f ''" .^'"'*' "/ '** ^f "' 'P"''^" °' *^^'> »'• 9, 10. A» tw« iiftinft Seeds, or Defendants claiming from Abraham. {r) And t3 th Seed. See Gen. ia.7. Repeated again in the following Chapters. O) Afy/iical Body, See v. 27. D III theftirfeof the law, being made a curfe for us : for it is written, Curled is every one thathangeth on a tree: ** That the blelTing of Abra- ham might come on the Gentiles through Jefus Chrift ; that we might re- ceive the promife of the *5 Spirit through faith. Bre- thren, I fpeak after the manner of men ; Though it be but a man's cove- nant, yet if it be confir- ^ med, no man difannulleth * or addeth thereto. Now to Abraham and his feed were the promifes made. He faith not, And to feeds, as of many ; but as of one. And to thy feed , which is Chrifl. «7 And this I fay, that the covenant that was con- firmed before of God in Chrift, the law which 15. l5. 17. 25 Ch. 111. GALATI ANS. PARAPHRASE. TEXT. to fet afide the Promife. For if the Right to the Inheritance be from the Works of the Law, it is plain that it is not Founded in the Prcinife to Abraham^ as certainly it is. For the Inheritance was a Donation and Free Gift of God, fettled on Abraham and his Seed by Promife. was four hundred and thir- ty years after, cannot dif- annul, that it /l.Ould make the promife of" none effect. 1 8. 19. SECT. V. CHAP. III. 19-.. CONTENTS. ■25. IN Anfwer to this Objedion, To what then ferveth thg Law ^ He fhews that the Lviw was not contrary to the Promife 5 But fince all Men were Guilty of TranfgrelTjon, v. 77. the Law was added to {hew the IfraelHes the Fruit and inevitable Confequence of their Sin, and thereby the neceflity of betaking themfelves to Chrift : Bar as foonasMen have received Chrift, they have attained the end of the Law, and fo are no longer under it. 1 his is a farther Argument againft Circumcifion. If the Blefling and Inheritance be fettled on A- I'or if the inheritance be of ig braham^^n^ Believers,asafreeGiftbypromife,and f,l^Z\ ^J\^:aZV^ was not to be obtained by the deeds of the Law, to what pyrpofe then was the Law? Ii was added, becaufe the Ifraelites, the Pofterity of Abraham, were TranfgrefTors (0, as well as otb r Men, to fhew them their Sins, and the Punilbmci^t and Death they incurred by them, till Chrift fliould NOTES. ig (t) Thatthis is the meaning of, iw«a/"f(>/ri'an/^rf^fl«,the following partofthfsSeftion ftews, wherein St. Taul argues to this piirpofe . yUe^evis were Sinners as well as other Men, ■v. 22. TbeLawdenouncingDeathtoallSirtnrrs, could f.ivenone^ v. 21. but was thereby ufe. ful to bring Men to Chrift, that they might be jullified by Paith, w. z^. 5ee Cb. 2. 15, 16. come. to Abraham by promife. Wherefore then ferveththe 1 j law? It was added becaufe of tranfgrelTMns, till the GALATIANS. Text. paraphrase. 27 Ch. Til. feed ftiould come, to wliom the promife was made; and it was ordained by angels in the han ' of a mediator. 20 Now a mediator is not a oiediator of one; but God 2 1 is one. Is the law then a- giinft the promifes of God ? God forbid; for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteouf- come,who was that Seed into whom both JevstMid Gtfwri/i-j, ingrafted by b.dieving, become the Peo- ple of God, ^nd Ch t 'vsi:ofJhabaw,thatSeedto which the Fromife\'. ;^ made. And the Law was ordained by Angels i' .be H.^nd of a Mediator(«), whereby it is manir-i:, thu the Law could not difannul the ProiDirc ^ Becaufe a Mediator is a Mediator between twoFrirricsconcern'd, but God is but one (w) of rhofe coricern'd m the Promife. If then the promiiV.d Inhcri' -mcecome not to the Seed of Abrnham v the Liw, is the Law "» oppolite, by the Cu: ^ it denounces againft TranfgreHbrs, to the \ ... nifes that God made of t\\t'^hi{^ngxo Ab' akarn- i-^oby nomeans. For if there had been a Law given v<,hich could have pur NOTES. («) Mediator. See Deut. ^. <;. Lev. 26. 4.6. Where it is faid, the Law made between God and the Children of Ifrael, by the Hani of Mofes. ; 20 (w) But God it one. To underftand this Verfe, we muft carry in our Minds what St, ' Paul is here doing, and that from v. 17. is manifeft, th.it he is proving that the Law could not difannul the Promife, and he does it upon this known Rule, that a Covenant or I'romife once ratified, cannot be alter'd or difannull'd by any other,but by both the Parties concern'd. Now, fays he, God is but one of the Parties concern'd in the Promife ; the Gentiles and JJraelites to- gether made up the other, v. 14. But jMj/m at the giving of the Law was a Mediator only be- tween the Ifraelites and God, and therefore could not j-- -.nfaft any thing to the difannuilingthe Promife which was between God and the Ifraelites and Gentiles together, becaufe God was but one of the Parties to that Covenant ; the other, which was the Gentiles as well as Ifrae- lites, Mofes appeared or tranfafted not for. And fo what was done at Mount Sinai, by the Mediation of jMi/t-f, could not a ffe A a Covenant made between Parties ; whereof one only was there. How necelfary it was for St. ?<»«/ toadd this, we fliail fee, if Wf,^.bn/ider 'that' without it his Argument of 430 Years diftance would have been dehcient an,'_. 'lordly conclu- fire. For if both the Parties concerned in the Promife haj Cranfaftea by M.-fes the Mediator i fas they might if none but the Nation of the //rae/rfei had been concerned in the Promife •nailp V.V C\c\A tn /thral>atn\ fhpv miffht hv mutual ronfenr havp alrf^forl nr Car nCJ^ »i,. r 20. 21. uidiiuii at jTiuuiit .j<'«a«, vjwu tTiiu »y the law. But the Scripture 21 hath concluded all under Gn, that the promil'e by faith of JefusChrilt might be given to them that be- lieve. But belbre faith 23 came, we were kept under the law, fliut up unto the faith which fhould after- wards be revealed. Where- 24 2 2. fhoul'i have been bv Law (y). Bur we find the quite cnntrnry by x\v'. Scripture, which mnkesno diftindion betwixt Jew and GetiriU in thisre- fpcft, bur has fhut up together all Mankind ("), Jevus ^nd Gentiles under Sin (rt) and Guilt, that the Blefiing uhich was promifcd to that which is Abraham ?< true and intended Seed by Faith {b: in Chrift, might be given to thofe who believe. But ^re the law was our fchooi 23' before Chrifl and the doclrine of Juflification by chri", °that'we^m^gh"t"be Faith (c) in him came,we Jews were fhut up a"; a j^ftified by faith. But after 25 company of Prifoners together, under the cuftody .tlong^i 'VTr\ lUZ and inflexible rigor of the Law, unto the coming mafter. of the Meffiah, when thedodrineofjuftilication ^4' by Faith 0/j in him fhould be reveal'd.So that the Law by its fcvcrity ferv'd as a Schoohnafter to bring us to Chrift, that we might be juflified by ^5' Faith. But Chrift beingcomc,and with him the Doftrinecfjuftification by Faith, we are fe; free from this Schoolmafter, there is no longer any Deed of him. 'NOTES, 11 (xl Zi'^jroiKTau, Tut into a State of life. The Greek Word Tgnifies to malie alive. St. Paul f onCders all Men here as in a Mortal State ; and to be put out of that Mortal State into a rate of Lite, he calls being «»aif o//rf. This he fays the Law could not do, beeaufe it could not confer Righteou&efs. (y) "ticvo^s, iji Lav), i. c by Works or Obedience to that Law, which tended towards Righteoufnefs as well as the Promife, but was not able to reach or confer it. See Horn. 8. 3. i. e. Frail \irr were not able to attain Righteoufnefs by any exaft Conformity of their A- ftions to the La*.« of Righteoufnefs. 22 ;?) ToioaFT*, A'J\ is ufcd here for ./4tf iM«ff._ The Apoille, Ra«w.3. 9.and 19. expref. fes the fame thing by waira?, all Men \ and , v. 21. and fometimes i;/e v 11,21. ($) By Faith. See v. 'A- 23 (d) ^uftifitation bj F^tth. See v. 24. SECT. GALATIANS. SECT. VI. 29 Ch. lil. CHAP. IlL 16 09. CO t} TENTS. AS a farther Argument todifTuadethem from Circamclfion, he tellstheG/7//7r/<7nJ, th^t byFaith inChrift, aJ], whether 7^^«'-f or Gentiles, are made the Children of God, and fo they flood, in no need of Circumcifion. TEXT. dren of God by faith in 2^ Chrift Jefus. For as many of you as have been bapti- zed into Chrift, have put jjon Chrift. Thert is nei- ther Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female : for ye are all one 29 in Chrift Jefus. AnJ if ye be Chrift's, then are ye A- braham's feed, and heirs according to the promife. 26 CO AD, i.e. PARAPHRASE. For ye are {ej all the Children of Goj by 26. Faith in Chrift Jefus. For as many of you as 27.. have been baptized into Chrift, have put on f/'J Chrift. Thereisnodiftindionof Ji-Tr/orGffrtt/Vi?; 28;'. of Bond or Free 5 of Male or Female. For ye are 25?.. all one Body, making up one Perfon in Chrift Jefus. And if ye are all one in Chrift Jefus Ci^* ye are the true ones. Seed oi Abraham^ and Heirs - according to the Promife. NOTES. (e) AH, i. c. Both Jevt and Gentiles. 27 \f) Put oa Chrift. This, which at firft fight may feem a very bold Metaphor, if sre conlider what St. Pa«/hasfaid, v. 16. and 26, is admirably adapted to exprefs his Thoughts - in few Words, and has a great grace in it. He fays, v. 16. that the j'ffj to which the Pro- - mife was made, was but one, and that one wm Chrift, And v. 26. he declares, that by Faith in Chrift they aU become the Sons cf God. To lead them into an eafie Conception how this is done, he he<-e tells them, thai by taking on them the Profeffion of the Gofpel, tl!ie/*J»e as - it were fus on Chrift ; fo that to God, now looking on them, there appears nothing but : Chrift. Tliey are, as it were, covcr'd all over with him, as a Man is with the Cloaths he hath put on: And hence he fays in the next Verfe, that Jhey are aU one in Chrift fefus, as if there were liut that one Perfon. 29 (^) The Clermont Copy reads « 3 vfiUs fie isl iv'X.^fS 'Ivicd'' jind if ye are one in Chrift Jefus, more fuitable, asitfecms, to the Apoftle's Argument. For v. 28. he ^ays, they are ail one in Chrift Jefia ; from whence the Inference in the following Words of the CUrtfiont Copy is Natural. And if ye bt me in Chrift Jefiu, then are yt Abraham' f Seed^ and Hein atcording to Promife, SECT. 50 I. '4- GALATIANS. SECT. VII. CHAP. IV. I II. CONTENTS. IN the firft part of this Sed:ion he farther (hews, that the Lnw was not ag.iinfl the Promife, in that the Child is not difinherited by be- ing under Tutors. Rut the chief Defign of this Seftion is to (hew, that tho' bnrh Jeivs and Gentiles were intended to be the Children of God, and Heirs of the Prcmife by Faith in Chrift, yet they both of them were left in Bondage, the jews to the Law, v. ^. and theG^;- Zilcs to falfe Gods, v. 8. till Chrilt in due time came to redeem them both; and therefore it was Folly in the Galatians, being redeemM from one Bondage, to go backwards, and put themfelves again in a State of Bondage, though under a new Mafter. PARAPHRASE. NO W I fay that the Heir, as Jong as he is a Child, difFereth nothing from a Bondman (hj, tho' he be Lord of all, but is under Tutors and Guardians, until the time prefix'd by his Fa- ther. So we CO Jews,wh'dO: we were Children, were in Bondaj^e underthc Lavv(i^).But when the time appointed for the coming of the Meffias was accompliflied, God fent forth his Son made of a NOTES. 1 (h) Bond/nan, (o j'Jj\S>"i^gnifies ; and unlefs it be fo trann.ited, v.^,7, 8. Bondage, v, 3. y, will fcarce be under Oood by an Englifh Reader ; but St. Paul's Senfe will be loll to onc^ who bv Servant undcrftands not one in a State of Bondage. 3 (i) We. 'Tis plain St. Paul fpeaks here in the Name of the Jem or JewilTi Church, which, though God's peculiar People, yet was to pals its Nonage (fo St. Paul calls it) under the reliraint and tutorage of the Law, and not to receive the PoirelTion of the promifed In- heritance till Chrili came. TEXT. Now 1 fay, that the heir as long as he is a cliild, ditfereth nothing fromafervant, tho' he be lord of all ; But is under tu- tors and governours, until the time appointed of the father.Even fo we,when we were children, were in bon- dage under the elements of the world : But when GALATIANS. TEXT. T AKAFHRASE. 31 Ch. IV. the (ulnefs of the time was come, God fent Ibrth his Son made of a woman, made under the law, to re- deem them that were un- der the law, that we might receive the adoption of Tons And becaufe ye are fons, God hath fent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father. Wherefore thou art no more a fervant, but a fon ; and if a fon,theiJ an heir of God throughChrift. Hcwbeit, then when ye knew not God, ye did fer- vice unto them which by nature are no gods. But now after that ye have J:nown God, or rather Woman, and fubiefted to the Law : That he might redeem thofe whp were under the Law,^nd fet them free from it, that we w ho believe might be put out of the ftate of Bondmen into that of Sons. Into which flateof Sons, it is evident th;it you Gdat'tans, who were heretofore Gentiles^ are put i forafmuch as God hath fent forth his Spirit (I) into your Hearts, which imbles you to cry Abbay Father ; fo that thou art no longer a Bondman but a Son: And if a Son, then an Heir (m) of God, or of the Promife of God through Chrift. Burthen, i.e. before ye were made the Sons of God by Faith in Chrift, now under the Gofpel, ye, not knowing God, were in Bondage to thofe who were in truth no Gods. But novxr that ye know God, yea rather, that ye are known (n) and taken into Favour hy him, how I^ OT E S, 6 (I) The fame Argument of proving their Sonfhip from their havingthe Sptrtt,St, Taut u- fcs to the Xowanj, Rom. 8. 16. And he that will read 2 Cur. 4. 17— "5, 6. and £p6. 11 — 14.. will find, that the Spirit is look'd on at the Seal and Aflurance of the Inheritance of Life to thofe veho have received the adoption of Sans, as St. Paul fpeaks here, v. 5. The Force of the Argument feems to lie in this, that as he that has the Spirit of a Man 'n him, has an Evi» ■dence that he is the Son of Man ; fo he that hath the Spirit of God, has thereby an AflTu- ranee that he is the Son of God. Conformable hereunto the Opinion of the ^evu was, that the Spirit of God was given to none but themfelves, they alone being the i cople or Chil- dren ot God ; tor God calls the People ofJfrael his Sons, Exod. 4. 2», 23= And heme we fee^ that when, to the Allonifhment of the yevts, the Spirit was given to the Gentiles, the jfewr no longer doubted that the Inheritance ot Eternal Life was alfo conferred on the Gentiles. Compare >4aj 10. 44 48. vthh AUs ii.i';-— 18. 7 [m) St. Paul from the Galatians having received the Spirit (as appears Ch. 3. 2.) argues that they are the Sons of God without the Law, and conlequentiy Heirs of the Promife with- out che i,aw. For fays he, v. 1 — 6. the ^ews then-felves were tain to be redeem'd frojn the IBondage of the Law by Jtfus Chrift, that as Sons tht)- might attain to the Inheritance. But yoa Galatians, fayshe, have, by the ," pirit that Is j!,iven you by the Minitiry oftheGofpel, an Evidence thatGod is your Father ; and being Sons.arc free from the Bondage of the Law, and Heirs without iu The lame fort ot realbning St. Paul ufes to the Romans, ch. 8.1 4 - 17. 9 (■«; Kn nn. It has been betore obferved, how apt St. Foul is to repeat his Words, tho* . fomethi/ig, K-iiied in thfir Signif cation We have here another infiance ot it, having faid Ye have known God. hefibjoyns, or rather are inorva of him, in the Hebrew latitude of the Word inowif in which Language it fometimes lignifies luojving with Choice and Approba- tion. See jimot y i. 1 Cor. 8. 3. caa 5. 6. B, 32 la ffi. GALATIANS. PARAPHRASE. TEXT. are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements , whereunto ye defirc again to be in bondage ? Ye ob- lO i'erve days, and months, and times, and years. In am afraid of vou, left I have beltowed upon you labour in vain. ■ can it be that you hi\vc been put out of a State of Bondage into the Freedom of Sons, fliould go backwards, and be willing to put your felves under the ((?) weak and beggarly Elements (p) of the World, into a State of Bondage again? Ye obferve Day?, and Months, and Times, and Years, incompliance with the Mofaical Inftitution. I begin to be afraid of you, and to be in doubt, whether all the Pains I have taken about you, to ftt you at Liberty in the F reedom of the Go- fpeJ, will not prove loft Libour. NOTES. (o) The Law is here called weak, becaufe it was rot able to deliver a Man from Bondage and Death, into the glorious Liberty of the Sons of God, Rem. %. i — 3. And it is called biggarly, becaufe it kept Men in the poor Eftate of Pujiils, from the full pofleflion and enjoy meat of the Inheritance, v. 1— — 3. Cp) The Apoftle makes it matter of Aftonifhment, how they who had been in Bondage to falfe Gods, having been once fet free, could endure the thoughts of parting with their Li- berty, and of returning into any fort of Bondage again, even under the mean and beggarly Rudiments of the Mofaical Inflitution, which was not able to make them Sons, and inftal them in the Inheritance. For St. Paul, v. 7. expredy oppofes Bondage to Sonlhip ; fo that all who are not in the State of Sons, are in the State of Bondage. Uxm, a^ain, cannot here refer to roix"*) Elements, which the Galatiam had never been under hitherto, but to Sob- dagCy which he telh them, v. 8. they had been in to Falfe Gods. S E C T. VIII. C HAP. IV. 11 ao. CONTENTS. HE i^xtffcs them with the Remembrance of the great Kindnefs they had for him when he was amongft them, and afTures them, that they have no Reafon to be alienated from him, tho" that be it which the Judaizing Seducers aim at. I GALATIANS. TEXT. PARAPHRASE. 33 Ch. IV. I bcfeech you, Brethren, let you and I be as if we were all one. Think your felves to be very me 5 as I in my own Mind put no difference at ail between you and my feif 5 you have done nie no manner of Injury ^ On the contrary ye know, that through Infirmity of theFlefh, I heretofore preach'd the Gofpei to you, and yet ye defpifed mc not for the trial I underwent in the FJeft (^), you treated me not with Contempt and Scorn ; But you received me as an Angel of God, yea as Jefus Chrift himfelf. What Benedidions (r) did you then pour out upon me ? For I bnre you wit- ners,had it been pradicable, you would have pul- led out your very eyeS, and given them me. But is it fo that I am become your Enernie, fj-J in continuingto tell you thetruth? They whowould make you of that ri»ind,fhew a warmth of Affedi- ontoyou: But it is not well. For their bufinefs is to exclude me, that they may get into your Affc- dion. It is good to be well and warmly affeded to- wards a good Man (r) at all times, and not bare- ly NOTES. 14 C^) What this vaalnefs and trial In the Flejh was, fince it has not plea fed the Apoftle to mention it, is importible for us to know : But may be remarked here as an inftance once for all, of that unavoidable Obfcurity of fome Paflages in Epiitolary Writings, without any Fault in the Author. For fome things receflary to the underftanding of what is writ, are ufually of courfe, and juftly omitted, becaufe already known to him the Letter is writ to and it would be fometimes Ungraceful, oftentimes Superfluous, particularly to mention them. 15 (ri The Context makes this Senfe of the Words fo necefiary and vifible, that 'tis to be wonder'd how any one could overlook it. 16 (s) Tour Enemkt See Ch. 1.6- 18 (t) That by M?,a he here means a Perfon and himfelf, the Scope of the Context evin- ces. In the (ix preceding Verfes he fpeaks only of himfelf, and die cliange of their AfTedi- on to him (ince he left them. There is no other thing mentioned as peculiarly deierving their affeftion, to which the Rule given in this Verfe could rcfiir. He had (aid ver. 17. '(\ixSmy v/^cii, they affeit lou; and Wa. cwTK^-^-.ty^S-ri, that you mi^'ht ^ffefl the/u ; this'is only of Perfons, and therefore ^ii;,i'o9«i mi xa^«, which immediately follows, may bed be underflcod of a Peribn, elfe the following part of the Vcrfe, tho' joyn'd by the Copulative J,, and, will •^ make *2 Brethren, I befeech you, be as I am ; for I am as ye are : ye have not injured * 3 me at all. Ye knov» how through infirmity of the flefh, I preached the gofpei 14 unto you at the dti}. And my temptation which was in my flefh yedefpifed not, nor rejeifled ; but received me as an angel of God,even *' as Chrift Jefus. Where is then the Blelfednefs you fpake of ? for I bear lou record, that if it had been poflible, ye would have plucked out your own eyes and have given them to i^me. Am I therefore be- come your enemy, becaufe 17 I tell you the truth ? They zealoufly affeft you, but not well ; yea, they would exclude you, that you ^8 might affeft them. But it is good to be realoufly afFefted always in a good thing, and not on- ly when I am prefent 13. 14. 15- 16, 17* iB. 34- Ch. IV, GALATI ANS. PARAPHRASE. TEXT. 19. Ivn'henlamprefentwithyou.My littleChildren withyou. My little chii- 19 dren, of whom I travail in birth again until Chriii be formed in you : I delire to 20 be prel'ent with >ou now, and to change my voice, for I ftand in doubt ot you. for \vhom I have again the Pains of a Woman in Childbirth tiU Chriftbe formed in you (n), i. e. till the true Dodrineof Chrifti.mity be fettled in 20. your Minds. But I would willingly be this very moment with you, and change (w) ray Difcourfe as 1 fhould find occafion. For I am at a fland about you, and know not what to think of you. NOTES. make but a dif-joynted Senfe with the preceding. But there can be nothing plainer, nor more coherent than this, which feems to be St. Paul's Senfe here. Tou mere very ajjeSionate to tne vohenltoiu XBithycu. Tou are fince e/frangedfrorn me ; it U the Arti^ce of the Seducers that have cooledyoutome.Eutif I am the^ood Manycu took me to be,youv>iUdowellto ccntinue the Warmth cffour AffeSion to me, vihen I am absent, and not to be well affeSed towards me only when lam prefent among you. Though this be his meaning, jet the way he hat taken to exprefs it is ■much more Elegant, Modeft and Graceful. Let any one read the Original and fee whether it be not fo. 19 («; If this Verfe be taken for an entire Sentence by it felf, it will be a Parenthefis, and that not the moft neceffary or congruous that is to be found in St. Paul's Epiftles ; or il. But, muft beleftout, as wefeeit isin ourTranflation. ButU'TinuiiLf^S, my little Children, be joyn'd on by A ppofition to v/a^i, Tuu, the lall word of the foregoing Verfe, and fo to the two Verfes 18 & 19, be read as one Sentence, the 20tiuer, with d I, but, in it follows very Naturally. But as we nowread in our Englifh Bible j (, but, is forced to beleftout, and the 20tfcvfr. llands alone by it felt, without any Connexion with what goes before, or Ibllows. 20 (w) 'A^difiu (fStlw, to change the VJci, feems to (ignilie the fpeaking Higher or Low* er ; changing the Tone of the Voice fuitably to the Matter one delivers, v.g. whether it be Advice, or Commendation, or Reproof, &c. For each ofthefe have their diftinft Voices. St, Paul wiflies himfeU' with them, that he might accommodate himfelf to their prefent Condition and Circumftanies,which he confeffes himfell to be ignorant ot,andin doubt about. SECT. IX. CHAP. IV. a I— -v. I. CONTENTS. HE exhorts them to fhnd faft in the Liberty with which Chrilt hath made them Free, (hewing thofe who are fo zealous for the Law, that if they mind what they read in the Law, they will there G ALATIANS. 35 there find, that the Children of the Promife, or of the New Jerufa- ^^|^ lem, were to be Free 5 but the ChiJdren after the Flefli, of the Earth- "^"^ ly 'jerufaletn^ were to be in Bondage, and to be caft out, and nor to have the Inheritance. TEXT. 21 Tell me, ye that defire to be under the law, do ye 22 not hear the law ? For it is written, that Abraham had two fons j the one by a bond- maid, the other by 23 a free- woman. But he who was ot the bond woman, was born after the flerti ; but be of the free-woman 24. was by promife. Which things ar-5 an allegory ; for thefe are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendreth to bondage, which is Agar. 25 For this Agar is mount Si- nai in Arabia, and anfwe- reth to Jerufalem which now is, and is in bondage 26 with her children. But Jerufalem which is above, is free, which is the mother 27ofusall. For it is written, Rejoycc thou barren that beareft not; break tbrth and cry, thou that travail- eft not: tor the defolate hath many more children than (he which hath an 25 Husband. Now we bre- thren, as Ifaac was, are the children of promife. PARAPHRASE. 21. 2 2.. 23. TelJ me, you that would To fain be under the Law, do you not acquaint your felves with what is in the Law, either by reading (x) it, or having it read in your Ailemblicsi' For it is there written (7 J, Ahaha^n h^d two Sons, one by a Bond-maid, the other by a Free Woman j but he that was of the Bond-woraan was born acrcrding to the Flefh, in the ordinary courfe of Niture; but he that was of the Free Woman, Ahr/jham had by Virtue ot" rhe Promife, after he ar:d liis Wife were pall the hopes of another Child. Thefe things have an Allegorical mean- ing : For the two Women are the two Cove- nants, the one of them delivered from Mount 5/«//i, ,ind is reprefented by Aga)\ who produces her llilie into Bondag-'.f'For Agar is Mount Sin li in Arabia) and anlwers to jfcrr/y^z/fw/ th.it now is, and is in Bondage with her Children. But the Heavenly 'Jerufalem which is above, and anfwers to Sarah the JMothcr of the promis'd S':ed, is free, the Mother of us all, both jeivs tniGentiles^who believe. For it was of her that it is written fcj, Rejoyce thou barren that bareft not - break out into loud Acclamations ofjoy^ thou that haji not the travails of Childbirth, for more are the Chil- dren of the defolate than of let that has an Huf- band. And 'tis we, my Brethren, who, 2^?, Ifaac 28 24. 25- 27. NOTE S. 2j (x) The Vulgar has, after fome Greek Manufcripts, Read. 22 (^) ^(^ritten there Cviz.) Ccn. 16.15. and 21. 1. The term idivin the impreliends th^live Books oi' Mofes. tomprehends th^ hve aooV-sot Moft 27 (x) '.nit tin (vix.) JJ'ai- 54- ' E foregoing Verier was. GALATIANS. PARAPHRASE. TEXT. 29. \\M?, are the Children of Proinife. But as then IjbmaeU who was born in th^ ordinary Courfe of Nature (a)^ perfecuted Ifaac^v'wo was born by an exrr^.ordimry Power from Heaven, working mi- .9c. raculouOy ^ foisir now. Bur what faith the Scri- pture (^), Ca[i out the B'nd ivorfuin tind her Son. For the Son of the Bon l-wovianfi:all not fjure the 51, Inht'Vtt^nce ivHh the Son of the Free-ivoman. So then, Brethren, uewho believe in Chrift are not the Children of the Bond-woman, butof the Ver. I. Free (f% Stand faft therefore in the Liberty wherewith Chrift hath made yoit Free, and do not put on again a Yoke of Bondage, by putting your feives under the Law. NOTES. But as tlien he that was 29 born after the ftelh, pcril'- cuted hiin that was born a'ter the Spirit, even lb it is now. Neverthekis.what 30 faith the fcripture ? Calt out the bond- woman and her fon : for the fon of the bond-woman Iball not le heir with the fon of the free woman. So then, bre-31 thren, we are not children oftlie bondwoman, but of the free. Stand fall therefore in i the liberty wherewith Chri'i hath made us free, and be rot intangled again with the yoke of bondage. 29 {a) 'O KdTct cai^xtt. y.m^eii, Born after the Flejh ; and to; xaxct ^ivT^ix, Bom after the rit. Thefe Expreflions have in their Original brevity, with regard to the whole view Spirit, Xhele txpreillOna ikiyw m luvh v^ii^mai uitvil-y, WILU JCMdru LU LliC WIJUIC viOTf wherein St. ?aul ufes them, an admirable Beauty and Force which cannot be retained in a Paraphrafe. 30 (b) Scripture, (viz.) Gen. 20.10. S E C T. X. CHAP. V. 2 13. COI^TENTS. IT is evident from Verfe 1 1. that the better to prevail with the Ga- latians to be circumcifed, it had been reported, that St. Paul him- ieU preached up Circuracilion. St. Paul, without taking exprefs no- tice GALATIANS. 57 ticeof this Calumny, C/?. 1.6. (3c 2. 31. gives .an Account of his part Ch, v. Life in a lara,e train of particulars, which all concur to make fuch a '^"''^'^ Charaifter of him, as renders it very incredible, that he (hould ever de- clare for the Circunicifion of the Gentile Convert?, or for their Sub- miffion to the Law. Having thus prepared tlie Minds of the Galatians^ to give him a fair hearing, as a fair Man. (^»Aat^ iv xocAui, he goes o!i to argue againft their fuhjeding themfelves to the Law. And liavjug eftabliflied their Freedom from the Law by many flrong Arguments, he cotaics here at lafl openly to take notice of the Report had been raifed of him, that he preached Circumcifion, and direciiy confutes n. 1. By pofitively denouncing to them himfelf, very folemnly, that they who fuffer'd themfelves to be circumcis'd, put themfelves into a. perfe<9: legal State, out of the Covenant of Grace, and could receive no benefit by Jcfus Chrift, ver. 2 4. 2. By ailuring them, that he and thofe that followed him, expe- ded Juflification only by Faith, v. 5 6. 3. By telling them, that he had put them in the right way, and that this new Perfuafion came not from him that converted them to Chriftianity, v. y — 8. 4. By infinuating to them, that they fhould agree to pafs Judg-- ment on him that troubled them with this Dodrine, a 9 10. 5. By his being perfecuted for oppofing the Circumcifion of the Chriftians. For this was the great Offence which ftuck with the Jews^ even after their Converfion, v. 11. 6. By wiftiing thefe cut off that trouble them with this Dodrine^ V, 12. This will, 1 doubt not, by whoever weighs it, be found a very skil. ful Management of the Argumentative part of this Epiflle, which ends here. For tho' he begins with fapping the Foundation on which the Judaizing Seducers feem'd to have laid their main ftrefs (v'lZ.J the Report of his Preaching Circumcifion ^ yet he referves the dired and open Confutation of it to the end, and fo ieaves it with them that it may have the more forcible and lafting fmprdlfllion on their Minds, Take ^8 Ch. V. GALATIANS. PARAPHRASE. T E XT. Behold, I Paul fay ant» you, that ifyebecircumci- fed, Chrift ihall profit you nothing. For I telUfie a- gain to every man that is circumcifed, that he is a debtor to the whole law. Chrift is become of no efkSt unto you, wholbevcr of you are juftified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righ- teoufnefs by faith. For in Jefus Chrilt, neither cir- cumcifion availeth any thing, nor uncircumcilion, but faith which worketh by love. Ye did run well, who did hinder 2. ' I ""Al^e notice that I Paul (J) who am falfly re- J|[ ported to preach up Circumcifion in other places, fayuntoyou, that if you are circumcifed, 3. Chrift lliall be of no advantage to you. For I re- peat hereagain what I have always preach'd, and folemnly teftifietoeveryonewbo yields to becir- cumcifed, in compliance with thofe who fay that now under the Gofpel he cannot be faved without it (yfta.i ircLMt ■atti'll dr^(^o>, v. 3. U'/tnefs again, continue m) TelHmon}- »» every Man, to you and all Men. This fo emphatical way of I'peaking, may very well be un- Jeritood to have regard to what he takes notice, v. 1 1. to be caft upon him, vi^i his ■preach- ing Circumtilion, and is a very (ignificant Vindication of himfclf 2 (e; Caiin.t bi faved. This was tlie Ground upon which the "Jews and yudai^itig Chri- ^■ans urged Circumcifion. See >4 (n) If it be fo that the Gentilt; Converts are to be circumcifed, and fo fubjeded to the Law,the great NOTES. ? («) This Expreflion of him that called, or calleth you, he ufed before, Ch. i. 6. and in both places means himfelf, and here declares, that this weicr/^ori Cwhether taken for Pt;)/«i3/icn or for Sub jeBion, as it may be in St. PrtJ^/'s Style, confidering OTHSeoSou, in the end of the l"ore.» going Verfe^ came not from him, for he called them to liberty from the Law, and not fub- jeftion to it ; Sec t». 1 3. Tou xvere going on well in the Liberty of the Ccfpel, wh. fi p d you i /, yoa may he fure, had no hand in it •■, I, you tncw, call'd you to liberty, and not to Subjcilion to the Law ; and therefore you can by no means fupfofe that 1 Jhould preach up Circumciftcn. Thus St, Paul argues here. 9 fi) By this and the next Verfe, it looks as If all this Diforder arofe from one Man. 10 (I) Will not be otherxvij'e minded, will beware of this Leaven, fo as not to be put into a Ferment, nor fliaken in your Liberty, which you ought to Hand fali in, and to fccure it, I doubt not (fuch confidence I have in you) will, with one accord, caft out him that troubles, you. For, as for me, you may be fure I am not lor Circumcilion, in that the ^ews continue toperfecute me. This is evidently his meaning, though not fpoken out, but managed wa- rily, with a very skilftil and moving Inlinuation. For as he fays himfell, Ch. 4. 20. he knew not at that diftance what temper they were in, (m) Kgiyu*, Judgment, feems l>ere to mean Expullion by a Church-Cenfure, fee v, t2. We rfiall be the more inclined to this if we conlider, that the Apolile ufes the fame Argu- ment of a little Leaven leaveneth the rvhole Lump, i Cor. 5. 6. wliere he would perfuade the Corinthians to purge out the Fornicator. 11 (n) Perfecution. The rer/a'Mf/on St. P<»«/ was ftil] under, was a convincing A rgumen;, that he was not tor Circumcilion and Subjeftion to the Law, for it was from the Je-ws, upon that account, that at this time rofe all the Perfecution which the Chriftians fuffered, as may be feen through all the Hillory of the A^s. Nor are there wanting clear Footlieps of it in feveral places of this EpilUe bclides this here, as Cb, 3.4. and 6. 12. offence 3. 10. II. 40 Ch. V. 12, GALATIANS. PARAPHRASE. TEXT. offence of the Gofpel io) in relying folely on a ceafed.i would they were 12 . ^ , ^ . r (-. 1 • ■'. ^ 1 r» ^ even cut off which trouble crucmed Saviour for balvation, 19 removed. But you. For, brethren, ye 13 I nm of another mind, and wifh that they may be ^*ve been called unto u- cut off who trouble you about this matter, and ^'*^* they fliall be cut off. For, Brethren, ye have been call'd by me unto Liberty. NOTE S. (c) Offence of the Crofs, See Ck. 6. i2. ■ . 14. SECT. XI. CHAP. V. 13 a6, CONTENTS. FRom the mention of Liberty, which he tells them they are called to under the Gofpel, he takes a rife to caution them in the ufe of it, and fo exhorts them to a Spiritual or true Chriftian Life, (hew- ing the difference and cotitrariety between that and a Carnal Life, or a Life after the Fiefli. Thouoh the Gofpel to which ye are called, be a '^"')' "fe not liberty for an tateof Libertyfrom the Bondageof the L.w, yet Srv'^oJeatVr"''' all the law is ful- 1. in one word, even the ADuleor ir,ro laiisne uie Luiior lue r n;m,out ferve(/^)one another in Love. For the whole Law NOTES. 13 (p) Aa^A'«T£, Sine, has a greater Force in the Greek, than our Engli/hWord Serve does in the common Acceptation ot it exprefs. For it fignifies the oppofke to hd-^ic^O; Free- dom. And fo the ApoOIe elegantly informs them, that though by the Gofpel tliey are called to a State of Liberty from the Law ; yet they were IHll as much bound and fubjefted to their. Brethren in all the Oflkes and Duties of Love and Good-will, as if in that refpeift they were their Vaflals and Bondmen. con- TEXT. QALATIANS. PARAPHRASE. 41 Chap. V. in this; Thou flialt love thy neighbour as thy felf. 15 But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not confumed one of 16 another. This I fay then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye fhall not fulfil the lull 1 7 of the flefli. For the flefli lufteth againft the Spirit, and the Spirit againft the flefli : and thefe are con- trary the one to the other ; fo that ye cannot do the things that ye would. iSBut if ye be led by the concerning our Dutytoothers,is fulfilled inobfer- vingthis ov.tV'[zct^x.X^)Thou(l}aU love thy Neigh- hour as rhjfelf. But if you bite and tear one ano- ther, take heed that ye be not deftroy'd and con- fumed by one another. This 1 fay to you, conduct your felves by the Light that is in your Minds(r), and do not give your felves up to the Lufts of the Fleflijto obey them in what they put you upm.For the Inciinationsand Defires of the Flcfh, are con- trary to thofc of the Spirit: AndtheDicbtcsand Inclinations of the Spirit, are contrary to thofe of the Flefli 5 foth^t under thefe contrary Impuifcs you do not do the things that you purpofetoyour felves(j).But if yougiveyour felves uptotheCon- N T £ 5. 14 c^) Lev. 19. 18. 16 Ir) That which he here, and in the next Verfe, calls Spitii, he calls, Rom, 7. 22. the intvard Man ; v. 23 . the Law of the Mini ; x;. 25. the Mind. 17 (j) Do not \ So it is in the Greek, andours is theonly TranQation that I know which renders it, cannot. 16, 17. There can be nothing plainer, than that the State St. Pda/defcribes here in thefe twoVerfes, he points out more at large, Rom. 7. 17, ^c. Speaking there in the Perfon of a jfem. This is evident, that St. Paul luppofes two Principles in every Man which draw him different Ways, the one he Ci\\% Flejhy t\\e other Spirit. The.'e, though there be other Appellations given them, are the mod common and ufual Names given them in the NewTeftament: By flejh is meant all thofe vicious, and irregular Appetites, Inclinations and Habitudes, whereby a Man is turn'd from his Obedience to that eternal Law of Right the Obfervance whereof God always requires, and is pleafed with. This is very properly called Flejh, this bodily State being the Source from which all our Deviations trom the firaight Rule of Reftitude, do for the moil part take their Rife, or elfc do ultimately ter- minate in : On the other lide. Spirit is the part ot a Man which is endowed with Light from God, to k;iow and fee what is Righteous, Juft, and Good, and which being con fult- ed and hearken'd to, is always ready to direft and prompt us to that which is good. The Flejh then, in the Gofpel Language, is that Principle which inclines and carries Men to 111 ; the Spirit that Principle which diaates what is Right, and inclines to Good. But becaul'e, by prevailing Cufiom and contrary Habit*, this Principle was very muth'weak- ned, and almoft extinvTcu is' V. 13. The Apolfle in both Places meaning the fame Thing, (v»^.) Gior\ing in another in having brought him to Circumcilion, and other ritual Obfervances of the Mofaical Law For thus it. Paw/ feems to me to difcourfe in this SeAion. "Bretliren, there be feme among *' )ou that would bring others under the ritual Oblervances of the Mofaical Law a Yoke *' which was too heavy tor us, and our Fathers to bear. They would do much better to eafc " the Burdens of the Weak ; this is fuitahle to the Law of Chrill which they are under " and is the Law which they ought llridly to oVey. If they think, becaufc of their Spi- " ritual Gilts, that they have Po\'.-er to prefcrihe in fuch Matters, I tell them that they " Inve not, but do deceive themfelves. Let them rather take circ of'their own particular *' Anions, that they be right, and fuch as they ought to be. This will give them matter of ■" Glorying in thenifclves, and not vainly in others, as they do when they prevail with »» them to be Circumcifed. For every Man fhall be anfwer.-9/j'>i nttntt. Xg^r^, that are called Chrifiians ; thefe Greek Words being a Pe- riphrafis for Chriftians, as is plain from the Dclign of this Verfe. But he that is not fa- tisfied with that, may fee more Proofs of it in Dr. Hammond upon the place. (f ) What the ApolUc means by Lord, when he attributes it to Chrift, Vid. 8. 6. and I. 2. ICORINTHIANS. An.Ch.e,T. 6. 8. INTRODVCTIOK and all extriordinary Gifts, as at firft by thofe miraculous Gifts the Gofpel of Chrift was con- firmed among you : So that in no fpirituaJ Gift are you fliort or deficient, f/) waiting for the coming of our L.)rd Jefut Cbrifi, who alfo fliall confirm you unto the end, that in the day of fhe Lord Jefm Chrift there may be no charge asainft you. For God who has c;illed you unto the Fellowfhip of his Son "jefiu Chrift our Lord, may be relied on for wh it is to be done on his fide. l^ OT E S. 7 f/) Vid, 2 Cor. 12. 12, 13. T EXT, Even as the teftimony of 6 Chrift was confirmed in )ou. So that ye come be- -j hind in no Gilt ; waiting for the coming of our Lord Jefus Chrift : Who fhall 8 alio confirm you unto the endjthat ye may be blame- lefs in the Jav of our Lord Jefus Chrift. God ^ is faithful, by whom ye were called unto the fel. lowftiip of his Son Jefus Chrift our Lord. SECT. 11. C H A P. I. 10. VI. ao. CONTENTS. THere were great Diforders in the Church of Gor'mth^ caufcd chiefly by a Faction raifed there againft St. Pmil : The Par- ■ tifans of the Fadion mightily cried up and gloried in their Lea- der.'^, who did all they could to difpnagc St. P^z properly fignilies ;«»o, fo the FrencTi tranflate it here: The. Phrafe fxt.it'it^i- vou «',-, to be baptised into any one% Name, or into any one, is folemnly by that Ceremony to enter himfelF a Difoiple of him into whole Name he is baptized, with Protefliou to re- ceive his Doftrine and Rules, and fubmit to his Authority : A very good Argument here why they fliould be called by no one's Name but Cbrifl's. Now this I fay, that e-l2 very one of you faith, I am of Paul, and I of A» polios, and I of Cephas, and I ofChrift. IsChrifti? divided ? was Paul cruci- fied for you ? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul ? 1 thank God that 1 14 baptized none of you, but Crifpus and Gaius; Left 1 5 any (hould fay that I had baptized in mine own name. And I baptized al- 16 fo the houfhold of Ste- phanas : belides, 1 know not whether I baptized any other. ■ SECT. 11. N. 2. CHAP. I. 17 51. CONTENTS. TH K next Argument of St. Paul to flop their Followers from glorying in thefe faife Apoftles, is, that neither any Advan- tage of Extradion nor Skill in the Leaning of the Jews, nor in the Philofophy and Eloquence of the Greeks was that for which Go 1 chofe Men to be Preachers of the Gofpel. Thofe whom he made choice of for overturning the Mighty and the Learned, were mean plain illiterate Men. For ICORINTHIANS. 9 Jin. T E XT. PARAPHRASE. An.Ch.<,J. Neronis 3. 19 17 For Chrift Tent me not to baptize, but to preach the gofpcl : not with wiWom of words, lefl; the crofs of Chrift fliould be made of 1 3 none effeft. For the prea- ching of the crofs is to them that perifli, fooli/h- nefs : but unto us which are faved, it is the power of God. For it is writ- ten , I will dei^roy the wifdom of the wife, and will bring to nothing the underftanding of the 20 prudent. Where is the wiie ? where is the fcrihe ? where is the dif- puter of tliis world ? hath not God made foolifti the wifdom of this world ? 2 1 For after that, in the wif- dom of God, the world by wifdom knew not God, it pleafed God by the foolirtinefs of preaching to fave them that be- lieve. For Chrrjl fent me not to baptife, but tc preach 17. the Gorpel -^ not with learned and eloquent Ha- rangues, lefl thereby the Virtue and Efficacy of Chrift's Sufferings and Denth fhould be o- verlooked and negleded, if the ftrefs of our Perfwafion fhould be laid on the Learning and Quaintnefs of our Preaching. For the plain in- 1 8. fifling on the Derith of a crucified Saviour is by thoff, who perifh, recaved as a foolifli con- temptible things though to us, who are faved, it be the Power of God, conformable to w!iat is prophefied by Ifaiah : I will dellroy the Wif- 19. dom of the Wife, and I will bring to nothing the Underftanding of the Prudent. Where is the Philofopher skill'd in the Wifdom ofthe Greeks? Where the Scribe {k) ftudied in the Learning of 20, the Jews ? Whtre the Profelibr of humane Arts and Sciences .> Hath not God rendred all the Learning and Wifdom of this World foolifh and ufelefs for the Difcovery of the Truths of the Gofpel > For fince the World by their natural 21. Parts and Improvements in what with them paHed for Wifdom, acknowledg'd not the one only trueGodjthoughhehad manifefled himtclf to them in the wife Contrivance ,-ind admirable Frame of the vifible Works of the Creation, it pleafed God by the plain, and ('as the World efteems it) foolifh Doftrine of the Gofpel, to fave NOTES. 20 (I) Scribe was the Title of a learned Man amongft the ^ns ; one vcrfed in their Law and Rites, which was the Study of their Doftors and Rabbies. It is likely the falfe Apolile fo much concerned in thefe two Epillles to the Corinthians, who was a Jew, pretended to Ibmethingof this kind, and magnified himfelf thereupon, otherwifc it is nor probable that St. Paul Sould name to the Corinthians, a fort of Men not much known or valued among the Creeks. This therefore may be fuppofed to be faid to take off their glorying in their falfc ApolUe. B thofe lo I CORINTHIANS. PARAPHRASE. TEXT. NeronU 3. 24 25 2 2. thofe who receive and believe ir. Since (l") both the Jews demand extraordinary Signs and Mi- racles 5 and the Greeks feek VVifdom 3 but I 23. have nothing elfe to preach to them but Chrift crucified, a Dodlrine ofFenfive to the Hopes and Expedations of the Jews -^ and foolifh to the acute Men of Learning, the Greeks:^ but yet it is tothefe, both Jervs and Greeks fwhen they are convertedj Chri^ the Power of Cod, and ChriJI the Wifdom of God : Beciufethit which feems Fooh'fhnefs in thofe who came from God, furpalles the Wifdom of Man ^ and that which 26. feems Weaknefs in thofe fent by God, furpalFes the Power of Men. For refled upon your felves, Brethren, and you may obfcrve, that there are not many of the wife and learned Men, not many Men of Power or of Birth among you that are called. But God h^^th chofen the foolifh Men in the account of the World, to confound the wife ^ and God h.ith chofen the weak Men of the World to confound 27 For the Jews require a 22 fign, and the Greeks feek after wif.^om : But we 23 preach Chrift crucified, unto the Jews a flumbling block, and unto the Greeks, fooliilincrs ; But unto them 24. which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Chrift, the power of God, and the wifdom of God, Becaufe 25 the fooliihnefs of God is wifer than men; and the weaknefs of God is ftrong- er than men. For ye fee 26 your calling, brethren, how that not many wife men after the fielh, not many mighty, not many noble are called. But God 27 hath chofen the foolifli things of the world, to confound the wife ; and God hath chofen the weak things of the world , to confound the things whtcl) are mighty ; NOTES. 22 (1) 'E-TTtfJi K,, fime both. Thefe Words ufed here by St. Paul are not certainly idle and infignificant, and therefore I cannot fee how they can be omitted in the Tranllation. 'F.-/r«i5i is a word of Reafoning, and it minded, will lead us into one of St. Pawn's Rcalbn- ings here, which the negleift of this word makes the Reader overlook. St. Paul in ver. 21, argues thus in general. " Since the World by their natural Parts and improvements did not " attain to a right and faving Knowledge of God, God by the preaching oi' the Gofpel, " which feems Fool i/hnefs to them, was pleafed to communicate that Knowledge to thofe who believed. In the three following Verfes he repeats the fame Reafoning a little more exprefly ap- plied to the People he had here in his view, vi:^. Jew and Greeks : and his Senfe feems to be this; " Since the "Jevs, to make any Doflrine go down with them, require e.xtraordi- " nary Signs of the Porver of God to accompany it, and nothing will pleafe the nice Palates *' of the learned Greeks hut Wifdom, and though our preaching of a crucified Aff/^<»A be a «' Scandal to tlie Jems, and Foolidintlj to the Creeks; yet we have what we both ieek; for " both Jew and Gentile, when they are called, find the Mejfiah whom wc preach to be the *' Power of God, and the (F//"rfo/n of God. the I CORINTHIANS. r EXT. 23 And bafe things of the world, and things which arc defpifed , hath God chofen, yea, and tilings which a.e not, to bring to nought things that are : 29 That CO flefli fliould glory join his prefente. But of him are ye in Chrift Je- fus, who of God is made unto us wifdo'ii, and righ- teoufnefs, and fanftificati- -, I on, ; nd redemption : That according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord. II ylnCh.'jJ. Neronis 3. PARAPHRASE. the mighty: The me^n Men of the World, 28. and conteinptible, has God chofen, and thofc that are of no account, are nothing fw J to dif- place rhofe that are : That fo there might be 29. no rroin or pretence for any one to glory in his Frefence : N;tural humane Abilities, Parts 30« or Wifdom, could never have reach'd this way to Happincfs: 'Tis to his Wifdom alone that ye owe the Contrivance of it: To his reveal- ing of it that ye owe the Knowledge of it, and 'tis from him alone that you are in Chr?Ji Jefxts^ whom God has made to us Chyijtuuis WifdoiH, and Righteoufnefs, and SanQification, and Re- demption, which is all the Dignity and Pre- eminence, all that is of any vjilue amongfl: us Chriflians ; That as it is written, He that glo- 3r. rieth fliould glory only in the Lord. NOTES. 25, 27, 28. He that will read the Context, cannot doubt but that Si. Paul, by what he exprefle in thefe Verfes in the Neuter Gender, means Perfons, the whole Argument of the Place being about Perfons, and their glorying, and not about things. 28 (m) Tft/u*' o'T*, Things that are not, I think mi!oi\ By the foolijhand weak things, j/t(ToCfy'>]^ i, e. by limple, illiterate and mean Men, God iliould"/»aie ajham'd the learned I'hilofophers and great Men of the Nations : But by the /^>j otTtn, the things that are not, he would abo- !i(h the things that are, as in effeft he did abolifli the Jewijh Church by the ChriiHan, taking in the Gentiles to be his People, in the place of the reje(?ted Jev>s, who till then were his People. This St. Paul mentions here not by chance, but purfuant to his main Delign to flay their glorying in their falfp Apoflle, who was a Jew ; by (hewing that whatever that head of the FaAion might claim under that Pretence, as it is plain he did Hand upon it. (See 2 Ct. 11. 21, 22.) He had not any the leaft T'tle to any Effeemor Refpeft upon that account, lince the yero'fi Nation was laid afide, and God had chofen the Gentiles to take their Place, and to be liis Church and People inflead of them : Vid. Note on Chap. 2. v. 6. there one may fee, whoare thex«T(tf>/,cd5"i'i, the abcUjIied, whom God fays here, KarapiiJij, he will