/t nt-b Duke University Libraries Charge delivere Conf Pam 12mo #121 #/i/ George Washington Flowers Memorial Collection DUKE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ESTABLISHED BY THE FAMILY OF COLONEL FLOWERS :XEY HILL, I 'rate Court ibr > :rict uf Texas. ) GRAND JUKY KOOM. Houston FcS. ,::iO. 1^(33. Hou. WILLIAM PINKXEY HILL, Judge of the Coiifeder; the Easteni Distri Sir : I am requested Ijy the uuauimoub voice of tlu^ rirniul Jury of the Confederrac Court, no^v iu session, to return you tlieir respects and highest compliments for the lucid as well as patriotic charge you de- livered to them on Tuesdny last. And further, as th«^ Bentiments and opinions of your Honor are so just, so timely, so honor.ihie and so in- spiring, in tiiis day of uar and trial, Ave respectfully ask of you a copy for publication. In closing this request, allou the Avriter to subscribe himself, in the highest respect, Your humble and devoted friend, JAS. W. BARNES, Foreman, &c. Houston, February 20, 1862, JAMES W. BARNES, Esq., Foreman of the Grand Jmj : Sir: Y'our note in behalf of the Grand Jury, requesting for publication a copy of my charge, is received, and I submit herewith a copy, as requc'sted, to be disposed of as the Grand Jury may think best for the public interests. It is, and will always bo to my mind, a cause of gratification, that the spirit and sentiments of my charge meet the approval of a body of citizens so intelligent, patriotic and honorable as your official body. I feel assured that in your hands the rights of the Government and the citizen alike are safe, and that from you the Government and the country will receive most valuable aid in the administration of the laws. Be pleased to assure the Grand Jury of my high regards, and r.ccept for yourself, dear sir, the assurance of my cordial esteem and friendship. With great respect, Y^our obedient servant, W\M. PINKNEY HILL. ij, l^' GE.N'TLKMrX OF THE GrAXD JuRY : On this occasion, it is proper to notice the interesting fact, that yesterday, Ava.s thment ; and, in some respects, iliere are material differences in the definition. 21 There are, however, a f;nv propositions wlilch are ^eiierrlly nct-ep'oxl as jiostidates, and are not required to be supported by reasoni;)^ or by authority. Every person must have a domicil Sv^mewhere. A person can jiavo but one domicil at one and tlie same time. Fact and ifite??t must concur to constitute domicil — tliat is to sr.y — residence and the inteniion of making- it the home of the pra-ty. Applying these tests to each particular case, the questions tliey in- volve may, most generally, be correctly solved. A sim.ple and comprehensive detinition is as follows : " That place is properly the 6?c>»7?«?r//of a person in which his habitation or residence is fixed, without any present intention of removing therefrom. " In the Roman law, is the following admirable deiinition : *' rhore is no doubt that every person has his domicil in that jdace which lie makes his family residence, and principal place of his business ; from which he is not about to depart unless some business requires; when he leaves it he deems himself a wanderer ; and when he returns to it he deems himself no longer abroad." It is said that "it is sometimes a matter of no small diHiculty to decide in what place a person has his true or proper domicil. His residence is often of a very equivocal nature ; and his intention r>3 to tliat residence is often still more obscure. Both are sometimes to be gathered from yiight circumstancfs of mere presump- tion, and from equivocal and conflicting ^'cts. " All the facts and cir- cumstance tending to shovr that a man has his home or domicil in one place, and all the facts and circumstances tending to establish it in an- other place, are to be considered and weighed against eachoiher-lhus in- volving a comparison of proofs. But there are soma facts which the law deems decisive unless controlled and counteracted by other facts, of more power and efiect. To illustrate this : — The place where a person lives, is 7y?'m, to be tahen as his domicil. Or, the place where a married man's family resides is generally to be deemed his domicil. But (his presumption may be counteracted by showing that the resi- dence of the party or of his f\imily, at a particular place, is only tempo- rary, for transient business purposes and objects, or for pleasure, or for health, and that, therefore, such place is not his domiril. Again : If a person leaves his former home, and takes up his abode a(t another place, it raises the presumption of an abandonment of the old domicil. But if it is proven that this absence is only for temporary purposes, but Avith an intention to return when the purposes of this absence are accomplished, there is no abandonment of the old domicil. Another illustration: A person may leave his old domicil and re- move to another place for temporary purposes, with the honajide in- tention of returning, but he may afterwards change his mind and de- termine to remain at his \\^^\^ place of inhabitancy — thus engrafting upon an inhabitancy originally taken for special and temporary purpo- ses, an intention of permanent residence. In such a case the domicil is fixed at the new place of residence as soon as the intention of returning is abandoned* ^^-ti-f^^^ 22 Ag.iiu : To pres.'i ve tlio domicil, a persoi) Itavinj^ it inut;t liave a per- sistent, certain and definite and continvirrr intention of retnrninvlio are earnest, ardent well-wishers to us, and Avould rejoice to know that AV(; had triumphed in the contest, and Avho may have a fixed or a floating intention to remove to tln^ Confederate States Avhen the Avar is end(>d. and the time of singing birds has come again; and if this be so, and it Avas all proven conclusively, it would still leave them in the condition of alien enemies. Still another class of ])ersons may come to your knowledge : that of those Avho Avcre here on the 21si of May last, but avIio sul)sequently abandoned the Confederate States and removed their domicil to th(! I'nited States. If such there are, they are not the less alien enemies, because they A^er(.' once citizens of the Confederate States. If you find property and debts within your jurisdiction belonging to persons who Avere, on the 21st of May last, alien enemies accor- ding to the rules and principles before stated, but Avho have since that time removed to the Confederate States, their property is subject to your inquiry and report ; and the opportunity Avill be given tliem to shoAV Avhy judgment of sequestration shall not be rendered against their property. * # # # ^^^^j jj^ ^j^jg connection, it is Avell to remark, that if any person Avas domiciliated in the United States on the 21st of May last, or since that time, and Avas then an alien enemy, and afterwards r<'mov<3d into the Confederate States, for the purpose of thereby shielding his property, from the consequence of being an alien enemy, such removal does not protect his property from sequestration. It is to be observed, that the status of the person, as to his domicil is the test of the liability of his property to sequestration. He must be, not only an enemy, but an alien enemy. The property of a domes- tic orehizen iMiemy, if any snch then*- be. is not by reason of his ho?- tility to tlio Gov(n-iiin('iit, subject to si'uiR'stration s(j long as he is domi- ciliitcfl, or has liis home ainoiia; us. He may be guilty of treason, and punished ibrit, ])ut his jjroperty is not tlien-for to be contiscatcd under this law. The abddc or domicil of the party determines the question of alienage, and the luvr estai)lishes his character as an c//?/tr//, as .'i corollary from the fact of his being an alien resident in the United States. ]3y the lav.' of nations, it is a necessary but terrible conse- quence of the war, tliat every man, woman and child in the United tStates is th(^ emiuy of every man, woman and child in the Confeder- ate States. Fix his domicil there, and friendship, affection and kin- ship can interj)ose no shield against this law. If you cannot iix the domicil there, the propertA'is safe from the law. liut, gentlemen, while you must not spare alien enemies — while tlu'ir property must be sequestrated for the beneiicent and just j)ur- poses of the law, you are instructed to exc^rcisc great care and cauiion 111 your inquiries and conclusions as to the fact of alien I'liemyship in every case where doubts are to be solved.. In some cases there may be conflicting facts ; a good citizen may have become entangled in a net of circumstances, that, without due investigation, would Iix upon liim the infamy of infidcdity to his country ; but when explained, would leave his patriotism untarnished. The citizen is as much enti- tled to exemption from the operation of the law, as is an nliini enemy to be puisued with all the energy and eiFect of its provisions. It is important to consider, that the mere fact of l)eing in the United States on the 21st of May last, or since that time, does not in itself constitute a ptn-sou an alien enemy. But in addition to that, the inten- tion to remain there must exist. In ascertaining the intention of the party as to his continuing permanently there, you may give much weight to the. consideration that he continues there voluntarily and without constraint, when it is the duty of every citizen of the Confederate States to be at hom*.^. ; but in every case you ought to consider every fact and circumstiince that may come to your knowledge, as well for him as against him ; and from the whole case, you must decide whether his domicil. is in the Unitt^d States, or in the Confederate States. Having determined this question, if against him, the law makes him an alien eiK'iny, and you will proceed to inquire into and report his property. Length of residence in the United States is not material, except as a fact tending to show the hdcntion of the })arty. We morereadily infer an intention ofdomiciliation from a long continued than from a short residence. We more readily mfer it in time of war, than in time of peace. An inhabitancy of one day, coupled with the intention to make it the home of the party, oven for an indefinite time, at once fixes the domicil. Of course, as to tliat large class of cases, in which there is no doubt or question as to the domicil of a })arty, you can have no difficulty. W. P. HILL, Hollinger Corp. pH8.5