Laiv Reports — Criminal Caifse. THE GREAT RAPE CASE. A complete History of the Remarkable Charge of Rape against .] . D. WEAVER : WITH THE Verbatim Report of the Testimony of CATHARINE E. LAHENNY AND SARAH McNJEIL. 0}« orlicr tlic low and groveling haunts of sensuality. In publishing the details of the "Great Weaver Rape Case,' it is willi no view of ministering to a depraved public appetite : on the contrary it is for the pur- pose, of pointing out the corruption which exists in our social system in order that the statesman and moralist may apply a remedy. That there are men wlto de- light in virtue and find no bondage in morality, proves at least that before our race is a high goal of possibility. But it is necessary, in order to have a c^ear comprehension of the position and relationships which men and women Itold to- wards each other, that we shall know something of why^ is evil as well as what is good, for though the one be life's polar star, the other may serve as a perpetual beacon. To guide us we want the pillar of cloud by day as well of flame by night. Of all crimes iu the catalogue of human frailty, tliere is none al which a pro- perly organized manhood more instinctively revolts than that of a fovoed com- merce between the sexes. To woo ''as the lion woos his bride.' is foreign enough to the geiitle endearments by which the ties of human love arc tisually cemented, but to use more than beastly violence in the gratiiicatiou of passion's fever, is worse than fiendish. Commerce, unless reciprocal, i.s unnatural, and the love which degenerates into lust is unworthy of t!ie name. The Weaver Kapc Case is interesiing, as it illustrates phases ol' liumau frailly and degradation which are usually hidden by the social mantle. In it there are three conspicuous cliaracters — J. D. Weavei", the debauchee : Catharine K. La- henny, the alleged victim; and Sarah McNeil, Weaver's house-keeper and princi- pal witness. The first figures l)cfore the world as a t^. AVkaveii on a charge of rape awnkiMicd ilic lecollcctioiis of the past against him and stirred the tongues of scandal to his prejudice. Him name, in connection with another, who has been equally notorious in the walks of libertinism — has long been familiar to the public car. Strange rumor? are abroad of liille girls who arc decoyed into his premises — as was the unblushing girl who now acknowledges herself his mistress — to become the ministers of an unholy passion. In consequence of his licentious partiality lor little girls, he liis won for himself the title of r.hicken Fancier. He is ii man ^f medium height, rather inclined lo corpulaiicy. and about fifty years of age. His face has a somewliat bloated look and over his cheeks and chin the skin hangs loosely, while his protruding eyes seem striving in vain to liide themselves («mid the pur. ?iy folds by which they are surrounded. When speaking on amatory subjects his •eyes beam out with a gleam of sensuality, and nt other times they are mnrked (! imply by — •' .\ fidi'long, never ceasing gl.iuoi'. !iy doubt ami ciinniiifr marked at one. " His hair is brown. On bis lip he wears a dark moustache, which is tr:iined with something of a coxcomb's care, and his whole appearance is that of a man who had prematurely passed his prime, and is condemned to imaoinr. when ht* would read the excesses of his youth. Possessed of considerable means, variou-ly estimated at from ^100,000 In .$000,000, he has for years past occupied the upper portion of a neat three story Louse nt the North-east corner of Magazine and Natchez streets. Broad balco- nies, the whole width of '4he side v/alk, extend along both front and side of the dwelling, which has an open, airy, attractive appearance, as if no ■wrong or vio- lence had ever been committed beneath its roof. Into the upper Vooms sis win- dows open, and when the watchman passes to and fro in the Auietyide of night, the slightest scream could be heard if uttered by one who shrank ftom ,h. hated embrace, or prayed to be relieved from a deadly wrong. In tlie heat of summer niglits our windows and shutters in New Orleans are not closely fastened, and the winds of heaven are always ready to carry a report bursting from the lips of v,T,mau, fs the lightning from the oloml. THE VICTIM. Turn wo now to the complainant in the case, Catharine li. Lahenny. • In her testimony, Catharine sets down her age as twenty-three, but her appearance would indicate ;i somewhat more lengthened experience in the realities of life. Though far from being a beauty, she is not lacking in intellect, and her i)hysica] powers are considerably above the usual average. If fairly tested, her strength, we are inclined to imagine, would be found superior to that of many men. Her muscles are compact and apparently' vigorous in tone, and it seems difficult to bidievc that Weaver could have mastered hor in any effort, physical or mental.**^ Ireland, we understand, is Catharine's native place, but she spent many j-ears ia Scotland, and after her arrival in this country, she lived for a while in New '/ork- Her New Orleans experience extends back about three years, and her ro- putation here, ns far ns preseuted to tlie public, has been Invariably good. St« gave lier testimony in a straight forward, independent manner, as if she hud only the truth to say, and was determined that neither maidenly modesty, nor the wilcy snares of experienced counsel, could induce her to swerve one jot or tittle. Questions of the most delicate n.iture were answered without a blush, and beinjc without beauty she appeared to be equally lacking in that modesty which is beau- ty's chief ornament. Though Weaver is wholly without sympathy and under public ban, it is but justice to sny thai muny s\ispect tlio action of Oatharino (m ihc outworkings of a deep laid conspiracy. THE YOUNG IIOUSE-KEEPEH. The girl, Sarah JNIcNcil, stands before tlie world a.i "one more unfortunate," who ;-ccms to hug her chains^ind glory in lii'e profligacy which has blasted her young life. During the terrible epidemic of IS.jC, both her parents died, leaving her a waif upon the surface of society. At the ago of seven she became the child of Charity., and for (he kindnesses then and since extended to her, she appears to retain a proper feeling or gratitude. With regularly moulded features and « quick intelligence, she — but for the misfortune which settled on her infancy — might have become an ornament to society and the "observed of all observers" among fashionable circles. There was a rich promise in her childhood, but be- ing left without proper guardiaui^liip or maternal counsel, she ve'dily yielded in the temptations which beset her path, and appears lo be .scarcely capable of it- alizing (he condition of shame tn which she Has fallen. While mo condemn, let us be just ; pity her misfortuu* and reserve our ire for the heartlc.«>' profligaff who in jveaving the weT) of her destruction, blighteil so fair a tlower. As the principal witness for the defence, this girl — ^.iu.st now^ in her ^«ixtt•enlll fummer — attracted i\n little of attention. Admitting herself to be the mistresM i>;' Weaver, she told the story of how Catharine came to the hou.-e, and with ki^s>.vs, not coyly yielded, encouraged the advances which he veeuiel by no means unwil- ling to make. Considering the comparative physical power.-" of the prosecutrix and the accuseil, Sarah's stoi-y is much more in consonance with the theory "f probabilities than that detailed by Catharine. In some things however, Sarah does overstep the bounds of probability, and particularly in her assertion Ihut since the arrest of Weaver she has had no conversation with him relative i>i the case. Uy some this will be set down as a mark of that fidelity which is constant in the midst cf wrong — a fidelity which even (lie deceived can snmetimo! fntcr- taiu towards a deceiver. rurULAU FEELING. \n soon as rumors of the case were noised abi'oad, popular fc«ling became aroused to a high pitch against Weaver. It was indeed feared that he would b" seized and become the victim of jmblic vengeance, for even )iien of wealth an! standing in society joined in the hue and cry against him, and demanded thr.t n. slop be put at once and forever to the licentious improprieties which common ru- mor charged against him. Popular indignation Eeemeut ho must liave been either such a poor render as to have to spell out every ivord or else he thought very little of what was on the paper for lie never once turned it over. And occasionally he would forget to keep his eyes on the p.iper wliilo lie wns listening to the testimony, bui would suddenly raise them to the witness chair. When Catharine came to thai part of her testimony where she wns lollowed by him on the street, she knew where he was sitting although his head n-as then below the top of the clerk's desk and pointing directly to the spot .xhe signified him by the words: " That litth- man oyer there with spectacles onl" Of course every one in the court room stretched their necks to see him, at once, for it was the first reference tliat had been made to him, and he became the cynosure of every eye. For a moment he pretend*d to be perfectly absorbed in his paper and then suddenly looking up he gazed at Catherine with mild wonderment as much as to say: " (Ih, my dear, there nin^t hr- c.i ii(» mistake about it." -VLLEGED INTIMIDATION OF SARAH. Sarah did not remain in the court-room during the examination of Catharine, although she had come there to give her testimony against her for Catharine's counsel, fearing that Sarah would frame lier rebutting evidence according to the testimony for the State, asked the Court to have her kept in a separate room where she could not be approached or hold conversation with any one. Recorder l^mersou accordingly ordered her to be kept in officer Robinson's office, on the tioor below, and here she seated lierself and remained during Wednesday, after- noon and evening there not being an opportunity that day for calling lier to the chair. Officer Jloj-nan, one of the executives of the Court, "had charge of her. Several persons came into the room at difi"erent times while she was therC; and it has l)cen alleged, though without cause probably, tliat an attempt was made to in- timidate her. Certainly, officer Moj'nan would not have permitted sucli a thing. The Daily Bek, of the 4th of Jul}', in its local column, had the following words on this subject : "We are informed that Mr. Beggs also entered the room where Sarah was being kept, preparatory to her giving evidence in favor of Weaver, and among other remarks said Mr. AVeaver. and every one who testified in his favor, were going to be hung. This was highly wrong, and Lieut. Boylan told us if he had licen present either time he would liavc arrested Mr. Beggs.'' Mr. Blocker sat next to Col. I'ield at the lawyers' table, on his right, and Mr. Coleman was seated next to him. AVhile Catharine Avas in the witness chair she sat as calmly and unmoved as though she were among a party of friends re- lating to them something that did not concern her hardly at all. .Vt first both the counsel and the coi;rt liad to enjoin lier repeatedly to speak louder as her words could hardly be heard wifh any distinctness at a radius of six feet, but this did not appear to arise from any timorousness but from weakness of voice or from having accjuired the habit, at home, of speaking in a soft and light tone. Every once in awhile she would lean over, resting lier arms ou her lap, to give the words of her relation clearly to the clerk who was taking them down in writing. During no part cf the time did she appear the least agitated or even mored by the recital of her wrongs .and when she was being cross-questioned regarding the minutest details of the violation of her person she did not blush or lower her gaze from tlio counsers penetrating eye, nor did her lips quiver or her voice tremble. These facts are merely record^il as an integral portion of the historj' of the Lase ; not by any means to furnish an inference that it formed an indication of lewdness or brazeness of disposition. She gave her testimony clearly, boldly, and without the lea-ignirieJ thnt thoy wore tlirouxli with th«i witness. Col. Field pi'occcded to THE CROSS FA'AMINATION. Col. F. Where do j'OU live ? Witness. At No. 17 St. Louis street, bdwecu Chartrcs street r.vd the Leven. Col. F. llow old ai-e you ? Witness. I am twenty-three years of ago. as* mxirly as I nn tPtnembcr. Col. F. 11 ov,' much do you weigh ? Witness. 1 cannot ssiy; I was weighed htst Minimor hut do nut recoilecf ho^r much 1 weighed Tho cousel m^csscd this qusction verv closely upon her, asking severally,'- do you weigh 10(f pounds, 110, 120, 130.' 110, 150,? ' to cnch and all of 'which I be answered that she could not saj-. . Col. Field. How long since you caiue't II this city V Vv'itness. About three years ago. Col. F. Where did you come from? W. New York. Col. F. Who did you live with when you fist came hern? W. With the family of Mr. Cooler, on Bnronnc street. Col, F. Where did you go next ? W. I went to live with the family I live with now. Col. F. Did you live nowhere except witli (hose two families? W, I boarded for about a fortnight witii a lady downtown, opposite .V,'a?h:ng ton Square. Counsel questioned her very coscly ns lo the name of the lady, her bueiuees and how v.'itnes3 got acquainted with her, and to a variety if questions with this tendency she answered to the following effect: OVEUirAULING THE I'AST. Witness. I do not recollect the name of the, lady. 1 biicamo acquaiuie i with her through a lady and genlleman, Mr. .and Mrs. ytciger from New York, whom I had known in that city. 1 met Mr. and Mrs. Steiger on the street. Do not know the name of the street, having been a stranger in the city at that time. I do uoc know where I was going at time as it is so long since. It was in the afternoon I met them, as near as [ can recollect. I saw them once or iwico afterwards. 'Dicy came to sctf mc at this lady's house. They took rce lo tbo house the first timar 1 met them and 1 then engaged board there. 1 do not know where they staid. Mr. Steiger was a carpenter by trade. As well us I can recoiicct it was in September, two years ago, that I went to the house. 1 got ricquaiuted with Steiger in Fifth Avenue, New York. They came to sec me in '-'"ith street, near Fifth Avenue. I lived at Mr. lather's, who kept a carpet store .1 I'roadway. I lived in New York, nliout twelve months. 1 lived in Fifth \ venue before I wenb to i!Gth street. 1 lived at no other place in. New York. I have been .ill through New York but never lived in any other place. 1 know where the St. Nicholas hotel is. 1 boarded there last summer with a fnnii'y thai I wri-i I rivaling with. ^ Till-: STEIGER^ IN NEW VOllK I got acquainted with the Steigors through some friend*! in New York. Thfv lived in the lower part of the city. It was a dress maker Avho made me ac- quainted with the Steiger:". I do'uot know where the dress maker lived. 1 wnn made acquainted witli this drc?s maker through sonin ecrvAr.t Rirl?, being a pfranccr in Iho country. I suppose Mrs. Stcigcr wns an intimato friend of the 'Ircrs tn ikcr. wlio corifeidercd hor vcry.rospcctnh e. I wa"* in company uith Mr. nnd Mrs Stcigcr and tlic drc^j^-niukcr oei t';iihuriiie etrcct when we were introduced. The Louse en Washington pf|U!irc. where I boarded, was a email ivucment riioh /in poor pcojile are iu the habit of occupyinj:. Thi- hou^c waaon i!ie Icit hand rf'idc of the equirc as you go to the Conrthoubc. * The Kubjoct of this boardiiif; hou-.e and c.'atharinc'a ucquainluuce with the Steigcrs and her previous life was investigated in this searching mannfr apparently with tiio view (o lay bnrc her past IjJMory and thercbj' obtain a <-lue if possible to some cvtut or circumsiances ili:it might throw a doubt upon her purity and virtue, even if not to prejudice her case in the preliminarj- examination to furnisii grounds for learuiug eouicthiug of her derogotary in its nature that might be brouglit >ignin«t her on a jury trial. The regular orosb- ijucEfioning wa^ then resumed. LEGAL riT-FALL^ AND WITXCiS TUArS. Col. Field. How and where did ^W-avcr first accost you ' ^ Witness. He came by my Bide on Chartres street, about one or two o'clock and spoke to me. It was between Vicinville and St. Louis pirccts, as I believe. There was* no one with me. Col. F, V>'hcro were you going? W. I wa3 going home. 1 had been in iho Intelligence Ufifice kept by a Mr. Murphy. Col. F. Did he walk with you 'L W. lie only spoke to nic. lie did not walk with nic ; he walked on before mo. Col. F. What were his words ? W. lie asked mo did I require a eituation or did I know a respectable girl who did. He told me he lived at the Corner oT Magazine and Natchez streets, at)07e the drug store. He told me if I made up my mind, to come there at three o'clock. Col. F. Did you tell the woman where you went? W. I didn't tell her where I wa:i going. She was in delicate health and had company with her at the time. She had a child about a month old. Col. F. Did you find the place without any trouble ? W. I did not know where Natchez street was but I knew where Magazine street was and I found the place easily because 1 can read. Col. Field. Can you write also? Witness. Yes sir. Col. F. When you met Mr. Weaver did you ask him hiii name 1 W. No sir. I went right up stairs as he had given mc the dii-ection, into his ofBce. I found Mr. Weaver in hii> office. Col. F. AVhat time was it?/ , W. It was about three o'clock. CoL F. How many pair of stairs are there above the ofBoo ? W. I think there are two short flights. Col. F. Did he go up stairs with you ? W. No, he sent his colored boy up with me, and th. rr I saw the girl. Col. F. Did you go inside of a Voom ? W. The girl took mc into the bed-room? CuL F. How many bed rooms were there ? W. I saw two bed rooms. It was the front room the girl took mc into. There is a large verandah in front of the room on Magazine street. It affords a view of Natchez street. 1 walked out on the gallery after it was dark. I went out through tli^window accompanied by the girl. There arc six windows in the rootn I think. This is the room I went to bed in. These answers were given in reply to close intorogatories coDCcrDing the po- sition of everything in the rooms. The witness answered with great promptness and collectedness. 18 RECOXXOITRISG THE MAIN FACT.-=. Col. Field. What time did you go to bed? V/ituess. I do not kuow -wliiit fiiuc it wns: 1 liu'l n time with fh»' girl, and n part of the time in the dining room. Col. Field. When did you get through tea ? Witness. It was not dark when I got through. Col. Fie!'!. Did Weaver come into the room Hl'tcr you can)o in i'lom tb" gallery ? Witness. Ves, he came in after it was dark. COMING DOWN INTO PAllTICULAKii. Col. Field. When you came in, did you sit down on the sofa f Witbeas. When I first came in, I sat down on the sola. I do not know vibfsf I sat down on when I camo in from tlic gallerj'. Col. Field. Did not Weaver and you ait on the .sofa together ? "Witness. No sir. Col. Field. Did you not undress in that room ? Witness. Yes, and so did the girl. Col. Field. Did you have a night-gown there with you f Witness. No, I had on a chemise and petticoat. Col. Field. Did the girl sleep in a night gown ? Witness. No, she did not. Col. Field. IIow does the bed stand ? Witness. The foot of the bed was towarda the windows i]iut open upon the gallery. Col. Field. Were the windows up ? AVitness. They were not up at the time I ^vent lo bed. I -uw the girl ihnt them down. Col. Field. lIov» are tlicy let down ? J'.y liaiid i>r by weight ? Witness. I am not certaiu which. Col. Field. Was there a light in the room when you went to bod ? Witness. There was a candle light. Col. Field. Did you not engage in singing with Weaver before you went to bed? Witness. No sir, 1 did not. SKIRMISHING DETWEEN TllK OUTPOSTy. Col. Field. How long after you j:;ot into bed was it that Weaver got in "i Witness. About an hour after. Col. F. Was the light still burning? Witness. I think the girl had taken the caudle out. Col. F. Did not Mr. Weaver ask you if you. wished a liglit burning in liic room? Witness. No sir. 14 Col. I". Were you uwaki- when Weaver come into tic room to go to bed? Witness. I was. Col. F. Did you f^ec liim yuU "11" liis clothes? Witness. No sir. Col. F. Was the bed Miiull '.' Witness. No, it wtis a large one. Col. F. Did you tec him ivhcu be came to ihc bed? Witness. No, he was on the opposite fcido of the gir! Col. F. Did you see him wlien he threw himself into tbp ''cd ' Witness. I did. Col. F. Was there a inosr|uito bar lo ilic bed ? Witne-3. There was. CoL F. Did you see Weaver raise the bar ? Witncs.s. I did not fee him raise the bar until ho threw himself int'> tlip br.l UNDEll THi; MOSQUITO IJAR. Col. Field. AVas there room enough for liim betweeu you and the girl 7 Witness, lie pulled the girl away and threw Iiimsclf in the middle of iho bed Col. F. Which side vrere you on '.' Witncsc?. 1 laid ou the side of tlie bed next to the hali. Col. F. Was he undressed when he threw Jiimtclf into bed .' Witness. 1 don't know, he laid quiet tlicn. Col. F. Did he cover liimself ? Witness. No there was only ouo sheet on the bed. , Col. F. Did he get under that? Witness. 1 don't know whether he did or not. fjol. F. How long did he lay quiot '.' ♦ Witness. About an hour. • Col. F. Did he not take anj* liberties during th^t timo ? Witness. No sir. Col. F. What was your position in the bed ? Witness. I was lying on my side vrhcu he jjoi iuto the hcd ; oy fa5f> wns to- ward the hall, and my back toward him. Col. F. And how was Weaver lying ? Witness. I think he was lying on his side, facing lau. Col. F. Did he change his position during that time ? Witness. Not as far as 1 kuow. WEAVER'S JJIGI| rRlNCIPLFS. Col. Field. During that time did he put his bands over yc-i rJ ai] '.' Witness. He did not. Col. F. Was he touching you at that time ? Witness. He was not exactly touching me. ' Col. F. How long did you lie iu that position t Witness. For about three cju;ii'ters of an hour. Col. F. .\t the expiration of tlic hour what did Vrca-rcr do? Witness. He put his hands under my clothes. Col. F. AVhcn Weaver got into bed did you git out '.' Witness. No sir. Col. F. What did you do tlieu ? Witness. T said to him, go to the .St. James. He replied, you must think me very unprincipled to do you anything wrong v.itli another woman in bed with you, and he swore by everything sacred he would do nothing wrong to mc. Col. F. Did j'ou not know tlierc w;is a bed in another room ? Witness. 1 did. Col. F. What did you do when -Weaver put his liand.s under your clu'hcs 1 Witness. I started up in bed and struck him. 16 WEAVER APOLOGISES. Col. Field. What did he do then •; Witness. IIo apologised. T was afraid to get ohl oI bed tor t'oui- he would take mfl away from the girl. Col. V. Did you see any nnn- or wi'apona in I he room ? Witness. No sir. Col, F. Did he th'cateu you '.' Witness. Ni t then. Coi. F. Did he tell you you t.houi.i imt gn out of the bed? Wimrss. No, but he held me by tbo i'igh( arm, his arm being around m». Col. F. How longdid you sit up in bed? Witness. About fifteen minutes. Col. F. Then what did he do? Witness, lie put his right arm nrotmd mo ;ind pull.d me down into the bed. Col. F. How did you lie then ? Witnes.'s. 1 laid on my side when he jmlled uk- down but ho lurned me toward him so that I laid with my face to him. CoL F. Did hn still have his right :n"m around you ? Witness. Yes sir. Col. F. What was ho doing with his left arm ? Witness. IIo was doing nothing with it at that time. Col. F. How long did jou lie that waj' ? Witness I laid with my face to his face about twenty minules. THE FIRST ATTEMPT AT RAPE. Col. Field followed -with a series of questions having for their purpose to ob- tain from the witness an explici* account of the first and unsuccessful attempt of Weaver to effect his purpose. Her answer.s to thfsc were to the following effect : Alter the expiration of these twenty minutes. Weaver threw himself on top of me. lie then turned me upon my back. I don'i remember whether he used his hands in turning nie, I was so much excited. He lifted up Jiiw clothes with one .. ihrew mo down. Col. Y. Was tliat after he got on you ? Witne*^.-. No. it was then that ho got ou me. conjsumm.vtion of the OCTR.VGK. A series of pointed interrogatories from the coini.s» 1 then elicited the following description of the rape from the witnee.s. He could not do much for some time, lie laid straiglit ou me. He h.id hi.s arm around me and kept luy lelt hand to one side of me. He lifted up my clothes with his left h;ind. I put down my hand but had not tlic power to pul down my clothes. I put down my hand again, but he laid so close 10 my person that 1 had no use ol it. When he threw himself down on me lie went between my leg.s. He opened mj' legs with his left hand in getting on me. .Vfier he waijon me for some time I Install presence of mind. It was at this time the rape was committed, 1 halloed for the girl. 1 Avas in such agony and )i!iin I do not know how long hti remained on me. I had halloed lor the girl before iliai. Ho told ine I might hallo as phe had gone to the adjoining buildiiig. Col. Field. What time elapsed before tlic return "f the girl to the room? Witness. I cannot tell what time as I had lost ray presence of mind. "Col. F. HoAV did she return? Witness. Air. Weaver laid in bed awhile, yud then go( u]i nud brought the girl into the room. Col. F. What was it ;)oii were halloing.' Witnes.-. I halloed for the girl and I hnllocl ; •• For God's f^ake lei mc out 1 " I recollect nothing alter this. At thi.^ stage of the proceedings, about three oclocU, the Recorder remarked that it was getting pretty late and it did not appear to him that the ooun«el would get through with the witness for soiiie time. Col. Field said h-:» thought he could finish his questions in a short time. Recorder Ernerson paid that he had been sitting since nine o'clock in the morning and was very much fatigued ; the examination might be postponed until five o'clock in the evening and then, having eeveial hours })eforc them, the}' couM go on with it until was completed. The counsel assented to this yirnpositiou -.md the llecorder declared the case continued until five o'clock 1'. M. 1'0PI;LAR INDICNATION. , The crowd in the court-room now slowly unwound itsolf i.ui uf the door and down the .stairs. When it had ncarl\ dispor'-ed into the street and while there was but about half a dozen people standing in the hall on the ground floor, Weaver came down stairs a short distance in advance of his counsel. There had been some very animated conversation among the people in the court room after the adjournment, an^I sentiments of deep indignation expressed against Weaver, btit it was not loud enough to attract particular attention and the object of if himself was perhaps unaware of its oxistence or strength. AVeaver had reached the bottom of the stairs and was passing through a knot ■jf three or lour gentlemen in the side hall, at the Lafayette street doorway, when <.ne of theiii, Air. .lames Beggs, confronted him and exclaiming; "Take that, you damned old scoundrel ! "' slappeil him across the face with the back of his hand, just as Weaver had looked up to see Avho it was addressing him in that manner. Weaver staggered back one .step, a look of wild alarm crossing his features, as if the thought had flashed upon him that it was the intention of the crowd to execute lynch law upon him. Then turning quickly he started for the door and a.s he did eo Mr. Beggs advanced two or three "Jteps and give him a vigorous kick in IT the seat of his pnnts that seemed almost to lilt him off of hia feet. Weaver darted out of tho door, turned quickly to tlio right and rau up to St. (.Charles street at the lop of his speed, t'ol. Field adranced toward Mr. liegps and m\d to him: " I observed you, sir." Mr. Beggs replied to him: "Very Avell, ."sir, I suppose you did, " aud tlicu turning to the other gentlemen, who wcro laughing at the ludicrous nature of Weaver's discomfiture, he remarked, rather excitedly : " The villain I lie follows married ladies about the streets." (Heferriug, of course, to Weaver.) Shortly after five o'clock in the evening Weaver w.i.'j in his neat in the court- room, and his counsel were present. Cjitharinc anv' her coimSel came in and iSarah returned io her seat in the clerk's room. The Recorder was somewhat lata aud the examination did not go on until nearly six o'clock. The court-room was iust 83 crowded if not more so than in the morning and tlic audience consisted of pretty nearly tiie same persons. Col. field rcKumcd his cros3-cx.imination Ri follows : Col. F. What lime did you get out oJ' bed .' Witnees. It was about five o'clock in the morning, a^ we!l as^l cm rcoolicct. Col. F. Did you go to bed after that'.' Witness. No, sir. Col. F. Did 30U dress yourself at once .' Witness. 1 lialf dressed myself in the ucil room, and then ?at down, crying;. C.\TIIAlUNIi; AND SAI!AK. ( ol. Field. Where was tiie girl ? Witnesi'. She was fanning Mr. Weaver in tlie bed. Oil. F. Did you return to the room where Mr. Weaver was in bed after that? Witness. I was several times in the room after my clothes before I left. Col. F. Wiiat time did you leave ? Witne*:.''. 1 left tlie house about two o'clock in tlie iift<'rnoon. Col. F. Where were you during all that time .' Witness. I remained most of tlie time in the room ih^il the ;:irl lirpt told r^ie I Bhould sleep in. f .ol. F. Did yon cat breakfast in that room'.' V.'itness. The girl and myself took coffee in the diidng room, the one next to the bed room. Col. F. Did you not eat breakfast there '.' Witness. 1 ate soda crackers, but did not eat anv meat, because it v.".ts Fridnv. .\t this i>oint District .\tlorney M. M. Reynolds, wlio had come into liic couri- rooui but a feW minutes before and ^at near the counsel for the prosecution, watching the case with some interest, arose and after excusing himself to counsel for the mtertiption proceeded to address the court in vindication of tlie witness from the extent to which counsel had gone in cro?3-qucstionin<» lior. He had n-> intention, lie said of taking part in the ca«e, in fact he knew notliing about it and had dropped in out of mere curiosity, as "a looker on in Venice," but he hod observed the tendency of the defendant's counsel to go beyond legal limits in hi;" interrogations. Uf what moment to this case was it wliether the girl ale only ^oda crackers because it was Friday ? Was tlierc a religious fjuestion to be made? l! was the right of the counsel to interrogate the witness upon all rautiiial jjoints involved in the case but he had no right to push them farther merely to wound her sensibilities and embarass and annoy her. Lawyers arc too apt to go beyond their limits with witncss.ses and it is the duty of the court to interfere for ;l)rir protection. This speech, which was a spirited one aud timely to tho feelings of the auditory caused them to forget the proprieties of tiie place and they gi-ceted Reynold's words With two successive rounds of npplau.se whieii made tho officers (vy out, "order I order!" indignantly. Col. Field replied in a calm and measured tone. It was far from his inlenliun or ilesire, he said, to wound tlie most seii'^itive nature or to !i>^k a Hinglo question 18 thai was uot nccessnry aud pertinent to the case, but ho had his duty inwards his client to perform and he should do it unflinchingly nnd claim every right that belongs to counsel in a court of law. His client appenrod to be very unpopular nt the present time; he had acted wrongly, inexcusably; he might be a very bad man; but it does not follow from that, by ilny course of rcasoniug, that he was guilty of this charge of rape, and he was entitled to as fair nnd a full trial and to all the advantages for acquitting himself that would be accorded to anj- other citizen of the community. Mr. Blocker now arose and took every one in the court by surprise by denying the right of Col. Field to be present at all; denying the right to cross question the State's witnesses or to introduce witnesses for the defence. He went into an elaborate, able and very interesting argument to prove that a comniittinj; magistrate's duty was simply to take cx-parte testimony and to judge upon tiiat whether there was sufficient evidence against an accused party to warrant his commital for trial before a competent court of jurisdiction. Up to the time of Philip and JIary, said he, the defendant had no right to counsel in his bel^alf, the court being considered his counsel. A Recorder's court is a statutory court and its duties and powers arc fixed and limited by the legislative enactments on the subject. Ho read from the 8tatc Statutes to pi'Qvc that nothing was said about admitting; testimony for the defence in preliminary examinations and therefore, as this court has no powers except those fixed bylaw, it could not admit exculpatory evidence. Coming down t'j the case in (juestion, Mr. Blocker referred to its features digressively and li\unclicd forth into a severe philippic against the accused, which brought forth a storm of applause from the auditory. The officers of the court shouted, "order! order 1 " and Lieutenant Boylan directed the arrest of one of the applauders as an example to the rest and a warning to them to observe decorum for the future. The party arrested was Mr. M. J. Brcuau. He Avas taken down stairs and locked up but in a few minute.", afterwards, upon the application of several of his friends, llecorder Emerson wrote an order for his release and he was set at liberty. This 'little incident had the desired effect and after that, throughout the whole proceedings, there was perfect order maintained and no uttered exprc.'^sion of feeling. AYhen Col. Field arose to reply, Mr. Blocker denied even liis right to speak in answer because he claimed that under the law he had no right to be there at all. This led to sharp and spicy interchanges between the counsel which are no part of the history of the case at issue. Recorder Emerson decided that Col. Field could reply to the law quoted against him and he did so in a speech of considerable length, quoting as his main point Justice Preston's decision on the appeal to the Supreme Court from Judge Bright's Court, in which that magistrate had refused to take down the testimony for the defence in writing but was required to do so by the decision of the Supreme Bench. The District Attorney had left the court-room and did not take part in this argument but Mr! Blocker replied to Col. Field, taking the ground that a new constitution had been framed since the decision of Justice Preston had been given, and that anyhow it could only govern Justices of the Peace and had no relation to Recorders' Courts which had been organized for special purposes in the parish of Orleans only, by the State Legislature. It was now about nine o'clock and it was agreed that as Col. Field had but a few more questions to ask the witness he coidd do so then. The cross-questioning then continued. CO^ICLUSION OF HER TESTIMONY. Col. F. After you left the room where did you go ? Witnes.s. To tlie dentist's on Canal street, being followed by Mr. Ueavcr's brother. Col. F. Bid you say anything about this aflair to the dentist ? Witness. No, sir. lie insisted upon my telling him what was the matter Avith me, but 1 refused. 19 » Col. r. Did you look ia at Mr. Weaver's office in going out 1 Witness. I passed the office of Mr. Weaver in going out of the house. 1 saw ;;entlemen in the office next to his ? t.'ol. F. Were you never in Mr. Weaver's office before that Thursday T AVitness. Never, sir. Col. Field. Why did you go into the dentist's office '.' Witness. I went in there to avoid the brother of Mr. Weaver. 1 was afraid of him. I did not want him to follow rae to where I lived. I did. not wish to he disgraced. Col. F. Did you know at the time that the man following you was Mr. Weaver's brother? Witness. I did not know it was Mr. Weaver's brother until the officer pointed him out to me. Col. Field. Did you not borrew a chemise from the girl who staid in tJie house ? Witness. No sir. Col. Field. Did you show your chemise or tmderclothing to any of your female acquaintances that day ? •Witness. I did not. Col. Field. W^ho washed your clothes ? Witness. I washed my own clothes. Col. Field. Where did you wash them ? Witness. At the place where I lived, on St. Louis street. Col. Field. Did you not ask Mr. Weaver for some money * Witness. Xo sir, I did not. Col. Field. Have you ever spoken wiih any person whatever on tlie lubjeet of obtaining money from Mr. Weaver '' Witness. No sir, never. The Court now adjourned to Friday, July oth, at five o'clock. P. M. The Weavers and Sarah, it appears, were afraid to trust themselves again among the crowd in going home from court after Weaver's little contretemps in the lowei- hall that afternoon. They passed down by the back staircase into the lockup and applied to Lieutenant Boylan for protection. \ number of officers offered to escort them home, and did so, although there was no sign o!' any demonstration against their safety. On Friday evening all parties were again in the court room and this time tlie crowd and their intense eagerness to hear every word of the testimony were greater than ever. They could not be kept in their seats but edged up toward the witness stand until the front rank were leaning against Jhc back;* of the lawyers' chairs. The case for the State being concluded Sarah McNeil was brought up to give her testimony for the defense. She was as cool, collected and unmoved as Catharine and gave her testimony in as straight-forward and assured a manner. She was quite as prompt and ready, only hesitating when she was pressed as to what she was hired for and what she Avas doing for Weaver, evidently not wishing to acknowledge so directly tliat she was his mistress. Deinp; duly sworn s!ie deposed as foWows : S.VRAPI'S ID?: A OF THE CASE. Col. Field. What is y«ur name V Witness. Sarah McNeil. (She writes ii •• Sarah M^ackueal,' hu evidence tC its not being genuine, as even illiternte persons who can write iheir own namn, .almost invariably write it correctly.) Col. F. Where do you livo? Witness. .\t the corner of Natchez and Magazine fct reels. Col. F. How long have you lived there ? Witnelg. Hince March last. 20 * Col. F. Do you know the prosecutrix in this cnse !■ Witness. I do. Col. F. When did jou eee her lirst ': Witness, it wa.s on a Thursday, nhout thn-o •» cKn-k, ni ihc coriu'i- vi' Niitchei Slid MftRftzine sirccts, up stairs, when' T live. Col. F. What did she sny there? Witness. 8hc said to me that shi' was j^oin;/ id «(;iy ^iih a jtoiiiloraan who v.anted .1 jrirl, Col. 1'. I'id (she take dinner and .•»iipper tiiere '. Witness. She did. The pfcntleinnn •vvns in and out on several occnMioi:?. Col. F. What pentlenmn V WitneH.M. Mr. Weaver. Col. ¥. Dill you observe tlie conduct ol' .Mr. Weaver and Cathariue I.nlienny tlint eveninc'.' If you did, state to the court what you saw. WHAT SAli.Vn SAYS OF CATilARINi:. Witness. .Mr. Weaver sat oa the sofa and Catharine sat beside him, and he »ang a little song, .lud she leaned her head on his shoulder, and she put her arm around his neck, and he put his arm around her waist. Air. Weaver asked Cath- .irinc tn kiss him and .she kissed him. Mr. Weaver kis.sed Catharine. They were laughinj; and fooling on the sofa till about dark. About dark .Mr. Weaver went out and did not conic home until about nine o'clock. We were both in bed and left- the light burning. Mr. Weaver sat down, conversed a little while and san.r^ another little song. Wiicn he was ready to come to his bed he asked Kate if he would ])lov> out the light. She said yes, she preferred sleeping in a dark room. Jle came to bed and got in the middle. Catharine made no objection, but was tickled to deatli. In the morning I got up and left theja both in bQd. They were lying close together, face to face, and in each other's arms. They staid in bed until about twelve o'clock; then they both got up. Kate and mo ate breakfast together. .\t the breakfast tabic Kate said to mo she would get seven dollars out of the old bugger. She told me not to stay there, to go with her. She told me she was acquainted with a young man who told her he would take a house up town if she would live with him. That she would not sleep with any ihan for less than I wo dollars and a half, as it. vould spoil the business of other girl.". Col. Field. IIow long did she slay ? Witness. 8he staid until about two o'clock on Fridav, bid me good evening and left. Col. F. In which room did you slcv'p .' Witness. I slept in the front room on the corner of Magazine and Natchez streets. W'c all slept there. Col. F. llow^ many widdows has that room 7 Witness. Six. Col. F. Do the windows open on the gallery ? Witness. They do. Col. r. Were the windows down or up that night ? Witness. They were up. Col. F. Where was Mr. AVcaver when the girl went awny ? , Witness. He was down stairs in his ofiice. This concluded the examination in cliief and the wUno.-a wni turned over to the counsel for tlie prosecution for the purpose of a CKOSS-EXAMINATION.* Mr. Coleman. How old arc you, Sarah V Witness. I am sixteen years of age. Mr. C. Have yo)i any parents or guardians in the I'ity ' Witness. No, sir. j\Ir. Coleman. Have you not an aunt or an uncle '/ \S'itnes3. Neither aunt nor uncle. X h.avo a Bister living »omcwherfe, but I don't knov.' where ehe ie. I have not Eecn her since I was six years old. 21 Mr. C Where were you born ". Witness. I was born and raised in this ciiy. Mr. C. Where were you living before you went to Mr. Weavers .' Witness. I lived at the corner of Bacchus and Thalia streets, with Mrr?. Arm?: -Mrs. Amies stays Avith her mother. I -^a there as one of the fnmilj'. ^Ir. C. llow long did you remain there ? Witness. Eight weeks. Mr. C. Where did you live before that '.' Witnes". On Felicity road, between liarchwK and Uryadex' streel-j with Mrs. French. Mr. ('. Wliat were you doing there .' Witness. I was doing house work. Mr. C. How long were you there .' Witnes.''. Three months. Mr. C. Where were you liefore that. Witness. I was with Mrs. and Mr. Creusiiaw fin- ciyht yenv in Jetfer.^on City. Mr. C. What business is Mr. Prenshaw in '.' Witness. lie is r., carpenter. •Mr. C. What were you doing there . Witness. I was living there as one of the family. Mr. C. Were you there under wages ? Witness. No, I was onlj- getting my clothes. Mr. C. How old were you when your molher and father died f Witness. I w.as seven years old. Mr. C. .\re these the only jjlaces you were ever in .' Witness. The only ones except Mr. AVeaver's. -Mr. C. Were you ever in the House of llefuge ? Witness. No. HOW S.VRAH (.;0T INTO Wli.WKRS HOUSE. Mr. C. How did you come to go to Mr. Weaver's ? Witness. I met a woman named Jane on (he street while I was looking tor u place, and she lirst brought me there. Mr. C. Where did j-ou meet this woman '.' Witness. It was about .Second street. Mr. C. Did she accompany j-ou to Weaver' ,s house ! Witness. She did. Mr. C. Did she go into the hou.se with you '.' AVitness. Yes. Mr. C. Did she introduce you to Mr. Weaver? Witness. She took me up stairs into the room acd f saw Mr. Weaver there. She remained there with me. Mr. C. How long did she remain there 'i Witness. She remained there for two weeks :Mter 1 went (o the house and then left. Mr. C. Was the girl living there? Witness. She was. Mr. C. What was her name V Witness. The only name I ever knew for her wa.^ Jane. Mr. C. Where is she now ? Witness. I do not know. Mr. C. How old was she ? Witness. She was a woman, I think, of aboui thirl}' years of age. Mr. C. What was she doing there? Witness. She was living in the house and doing the work of Mr. Weaver Ml". C. What kind of work. did she do for Mr. Weaver? Witness. She cooked two meals a day for him while she was thera. Mr. C. Is that all the work oho did for him V „ { 22 Witness. That's all the work slie did lor Mr. Weaver t'x<'0|.i wiiii she did lor herself. Mr. ('. Who did yoiir .sewing'.' Wiiuess. I sewed my own clot lie.-. Mr. ('. Did you have a great deal to ^i .' Witness. No, I did not have much to ". WHAT .S.VR.VII IS HIUKD IttU. Mr. <'. Wliat are you hired for '.' Witness I am liircd to cook two meals a day and to dean up the liou.-ie. Mr. C. When the Avoman Jane was there, where did yon .'deep ? W'itness. She slept in the kitchen I Mr. C. Where did you sleep '.' Witness. I slept witli Mr. Weaver. Mr. C. Are you married to Mr. Weaver ? Witness. No, I am not. Mr. ('. IIa,ve you slept in the same be'l ever siiun-? Witness. I have. -Mr. C. Have other women subseqnenlly slejit in tlie same hod witli Mr. Weaver and yourself? Witness. Yes, two or three have. Mr. C. Did j'ou goto bed voluntarily v.iih Mr. Wcuvi-r tlie first iin;e, or were you forcey him ? Witness. I went voluntarily into bed witli hiui. Mr. C. Have you staid witli any other man before you did witli Mr. Weaver'.' I'ol. Field. 1 object to that question. Mr. ('. I waive it then. (To the witness:) When Cathniliie came to tlie house did she not enquire of you the character of the place? Witness. No. She told me she was going to stay there. .She did not ask if ii w as a proper liouse. Mr. C. Have you not feltjoalou.s towards the oilier girls wliom Weaver brought into bed with you? Witness. Yes, I was jealous of Kate (meaning the prosecutrix ) and aiiolhei- girl. Mr. C. Now tell me, liavc you not had conversation with Mr. Weaver since liis arrest about this case? licraember, j'ou are under a solemn oath ! The witness glanced around towai'd Weaver, who was sitting in front and a littlo 10 the right of her, beside liis counsel, but Mr. Coleman at once perceived her straying glance and qurckly and empliatically said :•' Don't look at Mr. Weaver. Answer me that (jueslion, and remember (hat you are under oath 1"' Sarah im mediately returned her g.ii-.e steadly upon Mr. Coleman's eyes and answered lirmly :" No I" SHE NEYEll SI'OKK OF TllH ("ASK. Mr. C. Have you ever lind any conversation with any other person about this case ? Witness. (For the first time appearing annoyed, and in n slightly peevisli tone.) No ! I tell you. Mr. C. Since the arrest of Weaver have you been st.ayiiig Willi liim? Witness. Yes, I liave, Mr. C. And sleeping in the same bed with him ? Witness. Yes. Mr. C. And has he never referred to this ca.so or mentioned a word about it to you while you were in bed together ? Witness. No. Mr. C. Since his arrest lias he nouleyou any prcoiils or promised you any, or offered you any reword ? Witness. No. 23 Mr. (.'. Uns be given you any money whatever, or an\' jeweli y or flresFoa ? Witness. No. Mr. C. Do you intend to continue staying with him? ("ol. Field, i object to that question. Mr. C. Well, I waive it of course. (To the witness. :) ifavc you ever stated to any one that you were bound to testify to whatever Mr. Weaver directed you to do? ' Witness. No. Mr. C. Did you not tell Cnthariue that she was not the first woman ruined in that house ? Witness. No, Mc did not speak of anything of the kind. Mr. C. Have you not stated to Mr. Aleck Moynan, an officer of this court, that you were bound to tell anytliing that Mr. Weaver told you to, that would get him out of this difficulty ? AMtncss. No. Tho cross-examination of Sarali being concluded, Recorder Emerson announceil that he .should continue the case until Monday, July 8th. at four o'clock, ]\ M.. punctually. Monday afternoon cnnic and the ci'owd in the llccorder's Court was greater than ever. It was useless to attempt to hold the outer gate after the seats were all occupied: so man}' poured up against it accosting the officer with the swcctesi of smiles and the most insinuating pica for admittance one by one that liis heart melted before them ami soon the whole room was packed with the people, while a militarj' company, in full strength and accoutrements, blocked up the upper win- dow that opens upon the passage leading to the drill room above stairs. The weather Avas of tho hottest description imaginable, and the perspiration almosi steamed otf of the curious ci'owd and arose to the ceiling in any but fragrant clouds. Handkerchiefs were decidedly at a premium and they could be seen in every style and variety through the swaying, living mass, traversing and re-traversing the sweaty brows, checks and necks of their boiling owners. AVifh their quickly accumulating moisture they were soon iu the same state that Catharine describes her night clothes after flying all night in Weaver's fiery embrace. Allhough the case had been set for four o'clock, it was after five when Recorder Einerson made his appearance and took his seat. The counsel for the prosecution had given the court a long list of witnesses, including some of our first citizens, to be subpoanad, that their evidence could be taken ou this occasion as rebutting testimony, to prove that Sarah was nothing more than a common little strumpet, and thus destroy any weight that might attach to her storj'. AYliich of these witnesses were to prove such a character for Sarah or whether any or all of them were to do it will not be positively asserted here. The nature of their evidence will be seen when they are called up in in court to testify. The Recorder having directed their names to be called they were told off by the clerk, as follows : Mr. Finley, Mr. Bloom, Mr, X. Lambert, Mr. ('ommagero. Mr. D. E. Morphv, Mr. M. J. Brenau, Mr. Crickard, Lieutenant Eoylan, Mr. Couris, Dr. Moss, Mr. T. yi. PeMott, Mv. Montgomery W'atson, Mr. Joseph Ross, Mr. Robt. Meyer, Mr. Victor Savage, .Mr. Robert Ayles," Mr. A. McMahon, Mr. L. Fillev, Mr. F. Ciieler, :Mr. N. M. Benechi. Of this number only three, Messrs. Finlej', ]>renan and Ross, answereiK \ general look of surprise was evident upon the countenances of the auditors. That one or two should be absent would not have seemed strange, but that out of twenty witnesses summoned seventeen sliould have refused to obey the order was really surprising. AVhat reason could they have had for i-taying aAvay? It was a case in which a man's life hung upon the result. After some explanation between Mr. Coleman, tlic Recorder and the clerk as lo the manner in which the witnesses had been served with the subpoena, Mr. Colemau .asked for attachments to bring into court Messrs. F. Cooler and N. M. Benechi, as he said they were very important witnesses for him. The Recorder directed the clerk to make out the necessai-y attachment, when Col Field arose. 24 Ue remarkeil that he had certainly understood the prosecutiou had closed with their evidence on Friday evening, and consequently it would not be proper to ad- mit more teatimony in chief for them. They could only introduce rebutting tes- timony at this stage of the caao. If the witnesses whose names had been called were for the purpose of contradicting or invalidating Sarah's evidence, then they would be ndmissuble. Mr. Coleman replied ihat they had a right to introduce rebutting testimony at nuy btagc of the case, and lhat all of the witnesses who«c names he had handed in were for that purpose. WEAVER .VB.VNDONS THi: CONTEST. (.^ol. Field tiieu arose and spolcc to the following eflcct : "To make a short story out of a long one ; and to relieve your Honor from b'ing further taxed in this case, which has been prot railed to f-uch an unexpected length, and which it. .'•ppears the gentlemen propose to make still more lengthy, I will ask your Honor 10 commit (he accused for trial before the First District Court. This will place the case at once before the final tribunal in the matter, and 1 do it to save lime, not that 1 have the least doubt of what the i-esult would be in this- court." This unexpected and sudden termination of the examination took every one by •uprise and there was a dead pause for about a minute which was broken by Mr. Coleman" .s remarking: '• AVell, wc are satisfied, of course. " The Recorder said:" Well, I suppose if there is probable cause I am bound t) commit him for trial.' Mr. Coleman intcr]iOsed that if the accused v.ns isnxious to avoid the re- liuttiiig testimony, whicli would crush out every vestige and hope of the defence, they were perfectly at liberty to waive a further examination. Col. Field replied that he was not at all alarmed at the array of witnesses bi-oughl forward by th',* prosecution but the accused would bo more s.atisficd by a complete vindication of himself before the hnal tribunal. Mr. Blocker remarked that he approved of his friend's coui-se highly in bringing to a close this investigation which wa? exciting the public mind to so high a pitch against his client as every further dcvelopc- mcnt came out. Col. Field answered rather tartly that he did not. care one iol;i v.hat the opinion of the gentleman was in the matter : he had ncfed without any regard to the obtaining of that gentleman's approval. WEAVER HAS TO GO TO PRISON. ■Jhe Recorder here obsei'ved : "I commit the accused for trihl before the First District Court." Col. Field rem.arked : " Please endorse the paper as having done so at the request of the counsel for the accused." Mr. Coleman then inter- posed : "If your honor does so, please add: and with the consent of the counsel for the prosecution." Col. Field did not see what their consent had to do -with it. If he chose to waive the examination he rould do so. Mr. Colciftau said it had all to do with it. They had rebutting evidence to olf..-r and it was their right to present it then if they chose. They had three witnesses present but have waived the examination ot' them. The Fiecorder endorsed (he aftldavil as requested by both parties. • Col. F. What is the amount of bail your honor deems tiocr^-sary : llecorder E. 1 cannot admit Mr. Weaver to bail. (.'ol. F. (with a slight exhibition ol astonishment. ! Wliy, yuiir hi.nur linKth" wax'rant of Judge Collens to do so. • Recorder E. " I will read you tlie order of tlie First District Court, i He reads it) Now if I commit him for trial it is evident that there must be presumption sufficient, therefore 1 do not feel authorized to admit him to bail. He must go tn prison to-night and you can take means for his release by habeas corpus or