m:m>. '•■•■\: x: A<^ kj^^ ^K»-^ /.-, K l.;^ bifi • a,/(ni.x>t,M, Ki^cii'imAi^riK T'l)^ Til II IK ]LiVKmr.;u f^ tat ion. AN ACCOUNT LIVERPOOL AND MANCHESTER RAILWAY, COMPRISING A HISTORY OF THE PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS, PREPARATORY TO THE PASSING OF THE ACT, A DESCRIPTION OF THE RAILWAY, IN AN EXCURSION FROM LIVERPOOL TO MANCHESTER, POPULAR ILLUSTRATION of the MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO RAILWAYS. ALSO, AN ABSTRACT OF THE EXPENDITURE FROM THE C03IMENCEMENT OF THE UNDERTAKING, WITH OBSERVATIONS ON THE SAME. BY HENRY BOOTH, TREASURER TO THE COMPANY. LIVERPOOL : PRINTED BY WALES AND BAINES; AND SOLD BY THEM AND THE BOOKSELLERS IN LIVERPOOL; BANCKS AND CO. MANCHESTER J CAOELL AND CO. EDINBl'RGH ; AND HIIRST, CHANCE AND CO. LONDON, Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Duke University Libraries http://www.archive.org/details/accountofliverpoOOboot B1S.^R AN ACCOUNT, &c. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION— PARLIAMnXTARV PROCEEDINGS. The adoption of Railways as a means of inland communication, for the transit of merchandise and passengers, forms an era no less remarkable than the first introduction of Canals, and constitutes a change in the long-established modes of conveyance no less striking and important. The Railway, however, is by no means a recent invention : nearly two centuries have elapsed since the first partial introduction of Tram-roads, rudely constructed of wood, at a trifling outlay of capital and still smaller expenditure of scientific arrangement. The substitution of iron for wood was a great improvement ; but the form of the rail continued for a long time very objectionable, con- B sisting of flat pieces of cast-iron laid on the ground, with a side flange rising two or three inches to confine the wheel to its proper track. The rails thus resting on the ground, were unavoidably covered with soil or sand ; and it was not till the adoption of the edge-rail, raised above the ground, that Railways attained those advantages over common roads which they are now acknowledged to possess. In the last quarter of a century Railways have multiplied rapidly, especially in the neighbourhood of Newcastle and Sunderland ; and a large amount of capital and skill have been employed in their con- struction, and in the erection and adaptation of the different kinds of machinery with which many of them are worked. Still these Railways are comparatively of small extent ; detached, isolated and private undertakings, and appropriated exclusively to the conveyance of coals to the shipping wharfs on the Tyne and Wear. The first public Railway, established by Act of Parliament for the conveyance of general merchandise and passengers, as well as coals, was the Stockton and Darlington. This Railway is about twenty-five miles in length, extending from the Witton Park Collieries, in the neighbourhood of West Houghton, in the county of Durham, to Stockton-upon-Tees, and passing within a few hundred yards of Darlington, which is situate about midway between the two extremities of the line. This Railway consists of a single road, with sidings every quarter of a mile, to allow carriages to pass one another. A small quantity 3 of merchandise, and 300 or 400 passengers weekly, are conveyed along this line between Darlington and Stockton ; but here, as in the neighbourhood of Newcastle, Coal is the staple commodity, the tolls on this article alone being six or seven times the amount derived from the aggregate of all the other sources of revenue. The subscribers to this undertaking had originally to encounter a long and strenuous opposition on the part of land-owners, whose property was affected, and of coal-proprietors, whose pecuniary interests were interfered with. The first application to Parliament was unsuccessful ; but in 1823 the Act for the present line was obtained ; and the 27th of September, 1825, has become memorable as the day on which the Stockton and Darlington Railway was opened to the public. The project of the Liverpool and Manchester line was first discussed as early as 1822. Mr. Wilham James, of London, Engineer, having witnessed the powers of the Locomotive Engine in the neighbourhood of Newcastle-on-Tyne, conceived that it might be successfully employed on a Railway for commercial purposes. He brought a letter of introduction to Mr. Sandars, a gentleman who, having had practical experience of the insufficiency of the existing modes of conveyance from Liverpool to Manchester, was prepared to give all due consideration to any plan which proposed a remedy for a tried grievance. Mr. Sandars adopted the scheme, and became father to the present undertaking. A preliminary survey was made of the country between the two towns, Mr. Sandars being guarantee for the estimated cost. The line of road recommended in this survey was not ultimately adopted, but the project, after some inter- mission, went forward. A combination of striking and favourable circum- stances evidently belonged to a line of communication between the towns of Liverpool and Manchester : the one a commercial sea port, second in importance only to London; the other a large manufacturing town, and the centre and focus of a populous manufacturing district. Looking, indeed, at the intimate and neces- sary connection between the two places — foreign produce of every description passing daily from Liverpool to Manchester, and manufactured goods finding their way from Manchester to be shipped at Liverpool to every quarter of the globe ; considering this incessant interchange of commodities, comprising at that period upwards of 1000 tons per day conveyed between the two towns, and this large traffic being rapidly on the increase— one should reasonably have expected to find the utmost facility of conveyance subsisting between the two towns, or at least that no •very serious delays or difficulties would be found to impede the actual transit of commodities from the one place to the other. But how did the fact correspond with this reasonable expectation, and how far had the means of conveyance for goods and merchandise kept pace with the mighty commerce of the two towns? The great canal proprietors, which for nearly a century had taken charge of the conveyance of mer- chandise between Liverpool and Manchester, are the Mersey and Irwell Navigation (commonly styled the Old Quay) Company, and the Trustees of the Duke of Brid ge water s Canal. The flats or barges, in both cases, have to navigate the River Mersey from Liver- pool to Runcorn, a distance of about twenty miles, according to the ordinary track which vessels are able to pursue, and thence by separate routes, the Duke of Bridgewater's navigation by canal terminating in Castle-field, Manchester, and that of the Old Quay Company consisting alternately of canals and the Rivers Mersey and Irwell, till it reaches the same great depot; the whole distance being about fifty miles. The Old Quay Company obtained their first Act of Parliament in 1733, and the Duke of Bridgewater in 1760. We shall take it for granted that, at this latter period, the trade of Liverpool had so far increased as to render expedient the establishment of a second means of conveyance, namely, the Bridgewater Canal. We have now, therefore, to ascertain whether, since the period of 1760, there has been such an increase in the trade and commerce of this district, as to render it probable that even a third line of communication might be desirable and beneficial to the public ; and a few leading facts in the comparison will be abundantly sufficient to determine this point. In 1760, the number of vessels which paid dock duties at Liverpool was 2560. In 1824, when the Railway Company was formed, it was 10,000; the tonnage of the port Jiaving more than doubled in the ten preceding years, namely, since ISH. In 1784, twenty years after the establishment of the 6 second canal, an American vessel arrived in Liverpool, having on board for part of her cargo eight bags of cotton, which were seized by the officers of Customs, under the conviction that they could not be the growth of America ! In 1824, there were imported into Liverpool, yVom America, 409,670 bags of cotton. In 1 760, the population of Li verpool was about 26000. In 1824, the population was 135,000. The same stupendous increase is to be found in the trade and population of Manchester. In 1760, the population was about 22,000. In 1824, it was 150,000. The first steam-engine used in Manchester was in the year 1 790, thirty years after the Act was obtained for the second canal. In 1824, upwards of 200 steam-engines were at work. In 1824, there were nearly 30,000 power-looms employed, while only ten years previous there was not one* " Though the present argument required that I should show the great increase of trade up to 1824, it may not be amiss briefly to notice the augmentation of our commerce since that period. In 1824, year ending 24th of June, the number of vessels paying dock dues in the port of Liverpool is stated above, at 10,000 In 1829,it was 11,383 In 1824, year ending 31st of December, the cotton imported into Liverpool was 447,083 bags. In 1829, the importation was 640,998 „ In 1824, the quantity of goods passing daily between Liverpool and fllanchester was estimated at 1000 tons. It is now (1830) about 1300 tons per day; in the proportion of 1000 tons passing from Liverpool to ]Manchestcr, and 300 tons passing from Manchester to Liverpool. But the trade which has increased with perhaps the greatest rapidity is the It m«y be replied, however, to this statement, that admitting this vast increase in the population and commerce of the two towns, still, by increasing the number of boats, with facilities of loading and dis- charging, ample accommodation might be afforded to the public. But what are the facts as they existed in 1824? Mr. Sandars, in a pamphlet published in that year, expresses himself as follows : — " Notwith- standing all the accommodation the canals can offer, the delays are such that the spinners and dealers are frequently obliged to cart cotton on the public high road, a distance of 36 miles, for which they pay four times the price which would be charged by a Rail- road, and they are three times as long in getting it to hand. The same observation applies to manufactured goods, which are sent by land carriage daily, and for which the rate paid is five times that which they would be subject to by the Rail-road. This enormous sacrifice is made for two reasons — sometimes because conveyance by water cannot be promptly obtained, but more frequently because speed and certainty as to delivery are of the first importance." — P. 17. importation into Liverpool of live stock from Ireland, to be attributed mainly to the establishment of steam conveyance. The following is an authentic account of the import into Liverpool, principally from Ireland, for 30 months ; and of this large supply no small portion it is calculated will seek a conveyance to Manchester and the neighbourhood by the Railway : — Large Cattle Calves. 1 Sheep. Pigs. From June, 1827, to June, 1828 „ „ 1828, to „ 1829 „ „ 1829, to Dec. 1829, \ six months J "' 33,164 49,674 32,816 3,875 133,567 6,786 125,197 15,846 91,589 107,066 155,319 82,561 Total in 30 months, ending Dec. 1829. 115,654 26,507 1 350,353 344,946 About the same period also, the following- Public Declaration was signed by upwards of 150 of the most respectable merchants of Liverpool : — " We, the undersigned merchants and brokers resident in the port of Liverpool, do hereby declare that we have for a long time past experienced great difficulty in obtaining vessels to convey goods from this place to Manchester, and that the delay is highly prejudicial to the trading and manufacturing interest at large. That we consider the present establishments for the transport of goods quite inadequate, and that a new line of conveyance has become absolutely necessary to conduct the increasing trade of the coun- try with speed, certainty and economy." — (Sandars, p. 29.; Considering it, therefore, as undeniable that an increased facility of conveyance between the two towns was highly desirable, it became a question whether a Railway would best combine the essential requisites of safety, economy and despatch. In order the better to be enabled to form a judgment on this point, a deputation, consisting of Mr. Sandars, the late Mr. Lister Ellis, Mr. Kennedy, of Manchester, and the writer of this account proceeded to Darlington, where the Railway was then unfinished, and afterwards to the neighbourhood of Newcastle and Sunderland, where various Railways were in operation, and where both Locomotive and Fixed Engines were employed for the conveyance of coals from the pits to the respective places of shipment. This deputation made their Report to a Committee of Gentlemen in Liver- 9 pool, of which John Moss, Esq. was Chairman, on the 20th of May, 1824, when it was finally determined to form a Company of Proprietors for the establishment of a double Railway between Liverpool and Man- chester. A subscription list was opened and speedily filled, principally with names connected with the towns of Liverpool and Manchester. A permanent Committee was afterwards appointed, of which Chas. Lawrence, Esq. at that time Mayor of Liverpool, was elected Chairman. Mr. Geo. Stephenson, of Newcastle-on-Tyne, was appointed Engineer. The necessary surveys were undertaken, and every prepa- ration made for soliciting an Act of Incorporation in the ensuing Session of Parliament. On the 29th of October, 1 824, the Committee issued their Prospectus, which, as the first public announce- ment of the objects of the Company and the nature of the undertaking, I insert in this place: — " LIVERPOOL & MANCHESTER RAIL-ROAD COMPANY. COMMITTEE. CHARLES LAWRENCE, Esq. Chairman. LISTER ELLIS, Esq. ^ ROBERT GLADSTONE, Esq. f Deputy JOHN MOSS, Esq. C Chairmen. JOSEPH SANDARS, Esq. ) ROBERT BENSON, H. H. BIRLEY, JOSEPH BIRLEY, HENRY BOOTH, THOMAS SHAW BRANDRETH, JAMES CROPPER, JOHN EWART, PETER EWART, WILLIAM GARNETT, Parliamentary Agent, Thos. Moulded Sherwood, Kni.— Engineer , Geo. Stephenson, Esq. —Solicitors, Messrs. Pritt and Clay. — Bankers, Messrs. Moss, Rogers and Moss. Liverpool. RICHARD HARRISON. THOMAS HEADLAM, ADAM HODGSON, ISAAC HODGSON, JOSEPH HORNBY, JOHN KENNEDY, WELLWOOD MAXWELL, WILLIAM POTTER, WILLIAM RATHBONE, WILLIAM ROTHERAM, JOHN RYLE, THOMAS SHARPE, JOHN WILSON, Esquires. PROSPECTUS. The Committee of the Liverpool and Manchester Rail-road C 10 Company think it riglit to state, concisely, the grounds upon which they rest their claims to public encouragement and support. " The importance, to a commercial state, of a safe and cheap mode of transit, for merchandise, from one part of the country to another, will be readily acknowledged. This was the plea, upon the first introduction of canals : it was for the public advantage ; and although the new mode of conveyance interfered with existing and inferior modes, and was opposed to the feelings and prejudices of landholders, the great principle of the public good prevailed, and experience has justified the decision. " It is upon the same principle that Rail-roads are now proposed to be established; as a means of conveyance manifestly superior to existing modes : possessing, moreover, this recommendation in addition to what could have been claimed in favour of canals, namely, that the Rail-road scheme holds out to the public not only a cheaper, but far more expeditious conveyance than any yet established. " The Livei'pool and Manchester Rail-road is proposed to com- mence near the Prince's Dock, Liverpool, thence to Vauxhall-road, then through Bootle, Walton, Fazakerley, Croxteth, Kirby, Knows- ley, Eccleston, Windle, Sutton, Haydock, Newton in Mackerfield, Golborn, Lowton, Leigh, Pennington, Astley, Irlam, Worsley, Eccles, Pendlebury, Salford, Hume, to the neighbourhood of the westerly end of Water-street, Manchester : in the whole, a distance of about thirty-three miles. By a reference to the plan it will be perceived that the road does not approach within about a mile and a half of the residence of the Earl of Sefton, and that it traverses the Earl of Derby's property over the barren mosses of Kirby and Knowsley, passing about two miles distance from the hall. In deciding upon the proposed route, the Committee have been anxious, at considerable inconvenience and expense, to select a line which may not only be eligible, considered in itself, but may be as little objectionable as possible, with reference to individual and local interests. " The ground has been surveyed by eminent Engineers, and the estimated expense of a Rail-road, upon the most improved construc- tion, including the charge for Locomotive Engines, to be employed on the line, and other contingencies, is £400,000, — which sum it is proposed to raise in 4000 shares of £lOO each. 11 " The total quantity of merchandise passing between Liverpool and Manchester, is estimated, by the lowest computation, at one thousand tons per day. The bvdk of this merchandise is transported either by the Duke of Bridgewater's Canal, or the " Mersey and Irwell Navigation." By both of these conveyances goods must pass up the river Mersey, a distance of 1 6 or 18 miles, subject to serious delays from contrary winds, and not unfrequently to actual loss or damage from tempestuous weather. The average length of passage, by these conveyances, including the customary detention on the wharfs, may be taken at 36 hours, longer or shorter, according to the favourable or unfavourable state of the winds and tides. The average charge upon merchandise, for the last fourteen years, has been about 15s. per ton. " By the projected Rail-road, the transit of merchandise between Liverpool and Manchester will be effected in four or five hours, and the charge to the merchant will be reduced at least one-third. Here then will be accomplished an immense pecuniary saving to the public, over and above what is perhaps still more important, the econotny of 'time. Nor must we estimate the value of this saving merely by its nominal amount, whether in money or in time: it will afford a stimulus to the productive industry of the country, it will give a new impulse to the powers of accumulation, the value and importance of which can be fully understood only by those who are aware how seriously commerce may be impeded by petty restrictions, and how commercial enterprise is encouraged and promoted by an adherence to principles of fair competition, and free trade. " The Committee are aAvare that it will not immediately be under- stood by the public, how the Proprietors of a Rail-road, requiring an invested capital of j6 400,000, can afford to carry goods at so great a reduction upon the charge of the present water companies. But the problem is easily solved. It is not that the water companies have not been able to carry goods on more reasonable terms, but th^ strong in the enjoyment of their monopoly, they have not thought proper to do so. Against the most arbitrary exactions the public have hitherto had no protection, and against the indefinite continuance or recurrence of the evil, they have but one security : it is compe- tition THAT IS WANTED ; and the proof of this assertion may be 12 adduced from the fact, thai shares in the Old Quay Navigation, of which the original cost was £70. have been sold as high as £l250. each ! " But it is not altogether on account of the exorbitant charges of the water carriers that a Rail-road is desirable. The present Canal establishments are inadequate to the great and indispensable object to be accomplished, namely, the regular and punctual conveyance of goods at all periods and seasons. In summer time there is frequently a deficiency of water, obliging boats to go only half loaded, and thus occasioning great inconvenience and delay; while in winter, they are sometimes locked up with frosts for weeks together, to the manifest hindrance of business. From these impediments a Rail-road would be altogether exempt. There is still another ground of objection to the present system of carriage by Canals, namely, the pilferage, an evil for which there is seldom adequate redress, and for which the privacy of so circuitous and dilatory a passage affords so many facilities. Whereas a conveyance by Railway, effected in a few hours, and where evei-y delay must be accounted for, may be expected to possess much of the publicity and consequent safety of the King's highways. " In addition to the transport of goods between Liverpool and Manchester, an important branch of revenue may be expected to result to the Proprietors of the projected road, from the conveyance of Coals from the rich mines in the vicinity of St. Helens; an advan- tage which the water companies do not possess, and which, from its importance and extent, may probably enable the Proprietors to reduce their rates of carriage still lower than now contemplated. These coals at present pass along the Sankey Canal and down the Mersey to Liverpool, a distance of about 30 miles. By the Railway, the distance will be shortened one-half, and the charge for transit very materially reduced. ^ " Amongst the widely diffused benefits to be expected from the proposed Rail-road must especially be enumerated, no inconsiderable advancement in the commercial prosperity of Ireland. TJie latent energies of that country, her capabilities as a manufacturing power, will be developed by being brought into easy contact and communi- cation with the manufacturing districts of this kingdom : w hile every 13 article of her agricultural industry will experience an increased demand from the cheapness and facility with which it Avill be intro- duced into the populous counties of Lancaster and York. Whatever shortens the time of con\ eyance practically diminishes the distance, and whatever is saved in the cost of carriage is a gain to Ireland. " In the present state of trade and of commercial enterprise, despatch is no less essential than economy. Merchandise is frequently brought across the Atlantic from New York to Liverpool in twenty- one days; while, owing to the various causes of delay above enumerated, goods have in some instances been longer on their pas- sage from Liverpool to Manchester. But this reproach must not be perpetual. The advancement in mechanical science renders it unnecessary: the good sense of the community makes it impossible. Let it not, however, be imagined, that were England to be tardy, other countries would jiause, in the march of improvement. Appli- cation has been made, on behalf of the Emperor of Russia, for models of the Locomotive Engine: and other of the continental governments have been duly apprized of the important schemes for the facilitating of inland traffic, now under discussion by the British public. In the United States of America also, they are fully alive to the important results to be anticipated from the introduction of Rail-roads; a gentleman from the United States having recently arrived in Liver- pool, with whom it is a principal object to collect the necessary information in order to the establishment of a Railway, to connect the great rivers Potomac and Ohio. " The immediate and prominent advantages to be anticipated from the proposed Rail-road, are increased facilities to the general operations of commerce, arising out of that punctuality and despatch which will attend the transit of merchandise between Liverpool and Manchester, as well as an immense pecuniary saving to the trading community. But the inhabitants at large of these populous towns, will reap their full share of direct and immediate benefit. Coals will be broughttto market in greater plenty, and at a reduced price ; and farming pro- duce, of various kinds, will find its way from greater distances, and at more reasonable rates. To the landholders, also, in the vicinity of the line, the Rail-road offers important advantages in extensive markets for their mineral and agricultural produce, as well as in a 14 facility of obtaining lime and manure at a cheap rate in return. Moreover, as a cheap and expeditious means of conveyance for travellers, the Railway holds out the fair prospect of a public accom- modation, the magnitude and importance of which cannot be imme- diately ascertained. " The Committee do not tliink it necessary to dwell upon probable and contingent sources of revenue to the Proprietors, and of benefit to the community : but it is impossible entirely to overlook the ten- dency of increased economy and despatch to extend the commercial intercourse, not only upon the immediate line of road, but diverging in ramifications to the north and the south, and especially towards the rich and populous town of Bolton ; a short branch line being sufficient to bring that extensive manufacturing district into rapid and direct communication with this port. " Such is a brief view of the scheme in which the Liverpool and Manchester Rail-road Company have embarked, and which, while it promises such manifold advantages to the public, the Committee feel confident will afford a fair and liberal return for the capital invested by the Proprietors. " Charles Lawrence, Chairman. " Liverpool, 2dth October, 1824." Such, then, was the scheme of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway, requiring, however, the sanction of the legislature before it could be carried into effect. Parliament met early in the ensuing year, and a por- tion of tlie Railway Committee attended in London, in the first week of Feb. 1825, to watch the progress of the Bill through the House of Commons — an undertaking by no means a sinecure, as those who have had the good or ill fortune to be concerned in carrying forward contested bills will readily admit. The Committee anticipated a strenuous opposition, and they were not disappointed. The Proprietors of 15 three Canals (the Duke of Bridgewater's, the Mersey and Irwell, and the Leeds and Liverpool,) each in itself no despicable opponent, forgetting their mutual jealousy and former disagreements, appeared in for- midable array, acting on one impulse for the common safety, and prepared at all hazards to put down so intolerable an innovation on established modes and vested rights. This was to be expected. But the opposition did not end here. Two noble Lords, the Earls of Derby and Sefton, a part of whose estates the Railway crossed, made common cause with the Canals to prevent the establishment of a Railway. On the part of these noblemen, it was contended that the sanctity of their domains would be invaded, and the privacy of their residences destroyed, by thus bringing into their neighbourhood a public highway, with all the varied traffic of coals and merchandise and pas- sengers, that would be the consequence of such an establishment. The question being fairly brought before the House of Commons, the proceedings were briefly asfollow: • On the 8th of Feb. 1825, the petition for the Bill was presented to the House of Commons, and on the 9th the Committee on Standing Orders resolved that the "orders" had been complied with. On the 18th of Feb. the Bill was read a first time in the House of Commons. On the 2d of March the Bill was read a second time, after a debate of about an hour and a half, on which occasion Sir John Newport, Mr. Huskisson, Mr. W. Peel, Mr. Doherty, Mr. Calcraft, and Mr. Brougham, spoke in favour of the measure — \G Mr. Green, Member for Lancaster, and Mr. George Philips against it. The second reading was carried without a division. In the Committee on the Bill, General Gascoyne was requested to act as Chairman, an office which he kindly undertook, and which he fulfilled with infinite patience and perseverance during a protracted contest of nearly three months. On the 21st of March (all preliminary forms having been complied with), Mr. Counsellor Adam, on behalf of the Railway Company, made his opening speech in Committee, and on the following days evidence was heard in favour of the Bill, or in Parliamentary lan- guage, in proof of the preamble — the general tenor of the evidence being in confirmation of the statements and arguments put forth in the Company's Prospectus. Mr. Adam was supported by Mr. Sergeant Spankie, Mr. Joy, and Mr. Wm. Brougham. On the 2d of May, Mr. Spankie summed up for the Railway, and on the 3d Mr. Counsellor Harrison led on the hostile van, supported by Mr. Alderson, Mr. Parke, Mr. M'Donald, Mr. Earle, and Mr. Cullen. He did not deny that great inconvenience and delays had arisen from the defective system of Water conveyance, nor that occasionally it took as long a time to transport merchandise from Liverpool to Manchester as it did to bring it from America to Liverpool ; nor that a direct line of 30 miles on a Railway would present a speedier conveyance than a circuitous route of near 30 miles through Canals and tide-way. But it was contended that the Canals and River were capacious enough for all the traffic of the port ; that, moveover, 17 our levels and sections were erroneous; that the Locomotive Engine was an unsightly object ; and that the formation of the Railway would cost three or four times as much as the estimate : nay, Mr. Francis Giles, Civil Engineer, was produced to record his opinion that it would cost upwards of oG'200,000. to carry the Railway across Chat Moss alone : — from all which it followed, that, from considerations of kind- ness to the Proprietors of so wild and impracticable a scheme, the Bill ought to be rejected by the legis- lature.* On the subject of the levels and sections, the opponents of the Bill were correct in their animad- • I subjoin an abstract from Mr. Giles's evidence before the Committee of the House of Commons, on the 5th IMay, 1823, taken from an official copy : — Q. Be so good as to tell us whether in your judgment a Rail-road of this descrip- tion can be safely made over Chat Moss, without going to the bottom of the Moss ? A. I say certainly not. Q. Will it be necessary, therefore, in making a Rail-road which is to stand, to take out, along the whole line of the road, the whole of the JMoss to the bottom ? A. Undoubtedly. Q. Will that make it necessary to cut down the 33 or 34 feet of which you have been speaking ? A. Yes. Q. And afterwards to fill it up with other soil ? A. To such a height as the Rail-road is to be carried ; other soil mixed with a portion of the Moss. Q. But suppose they were to work upon this stuff, could they get their carriages to the place ? A. No carriage can stand on the Moss short of the bottom. Q. What would they do to make it stand — laying planks, or something of that sort ? A. Nothing would support it. Q. So that, if you could carry a Rail-road on this fluid stuff— if you could do it- it would still take a great number of men, and a great sum of money. Could it be done, in your opinion, for £6000. ? A. I should say £200,000. would not get through it. Q. My Learned Friend wishes to know what it would cost to lay it with diamonds ? &c. &c. D 18 versions : a considerable error had been committed by the Surveyors for the Railway; which, when discovered, was acknowledged in Committee. The rectifying of this error was to the advantage of the Railway Company, inasmuch as the cost of the cor- rected line would have been less than that of the erroneous section. The impression on the Committee, however, was unfavourable; and some degree of doubt and uncertainty was necessarily thrown on the whole of the surveying department. On the 30th of May, Mr. Harrison concluded the case for the opponents of the Bill. On the 31st, Mr. Adam replied ; after which, the Committee divided on the preamble, which was carried by a majority of one, 37 members being in favour of the Bill, and 36 against it. Such a result, after a three months' Parliamentary campaign, and after 37 working days spent laboriously in Committee, was far from encouraging to the pro- moters of the Bill. All the clauses and detail of the Bill had still to be discussed, scrutinized, and opposed; and it was hardly to be expected, after so protracted an opposition, that Members of Parliament, without that strong personal and pecuniary interest, in defence of which the Canal Proprietors might be supposed to make every effort, would still persevere in what, to many at least, might now be considered a hopeless contest. Accordingly, on the 1st of June, the first clause of the Bill, empowering the Company to make the Railway, was lost, on a division, by a majority of 19 to 13. The clause to take land was then put to 19 the vote and also lost; whereupon Mr. Adam, on behalf of the Railway Company, withdrew the Bill. Such was the result of the first attempt in Parliament to obtain the sanction of the legislature to the formation of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway. Scarcely, however, was the fate of the Bill decided for the passing Session before the first movement was made, and the first steps taken, for a renewed effort in the succeeding year. In the course of Parliamentary proceedings it has been observed, that where a Bill is vehemently opposed, whether with a view to the public good or from the impulse of private interests, still the measure is seldom carried the first year. The ground is broken ; the arguments on both sides are stated, and probably exaggerated ; the heat of parties is displayed, and in some measure exhausts itself. In another Session the subject is more likely to be dis- cussed with calmness and temper ; and if some public benefit be included in the scheme proposed, the chances of success are much increased in the second year. The promoters of the Railway felt confident that their failure was not to be attributed to any lack of public opinion in favour of the great work in which they had engaged ; and understanding that many Members of Parliament were strongly impressed with the importance of the measure in question, considered as a national undertaking, it was thought desirable that a meeting should take place between the Railway Committee and such of the Parliamentary supporters of the Bill as could conveniently attend, to record some expression of opinion on the then posture of affairs, and especially with reference to proceedings in future. Accordingly, the following Members of Par- liament met the Railway Committee (by invitation) on the 4th of June, 1825, at the Royal Hotel, St. James'- street, viz. : — General Gascoyne. Marcus Beresford, Esq. The Lord Viscount Forbes. Richard Hart Davies, Esq. Sir Philip Musgrove. W. H. Trant, Esq. Sir Robert Wilson. Robert Price, Esq. Right Hon. W. Huskisson. General Hart. Right Hon. W. Bagwell. Colonel Cawthorne. The Hon. General King. Colonel Crosbie. The Hon. Col. Lowther. Alderman Bridges. Thomas Spring Rice, Esq. Robert Downie, Esq. W, Y. Peel, Esq. N. Sneyd, Esq. William Holmes, Esq. General Gascoyne was called to the chair, and after some desultory conversation, Mr. Huskisson said, that he perceived nothing connected with the discussions on this Bill in the Committee of the House of Commons, or in the rejection of the measure, after the preamble of the Bill was proved, which should deter the subscribers froip renewing their application to Parliament another Session. Looking at the immense traffic between Liverpool and Manchester — taking into consideration the well-being of Ireland, which required the utmost facilities of introducing her produce into the great manufacturing districts — he had no hesitation in saying that, in his opinion, some additional and improved 21 means of conveyance between Liverpool and Man- chester wonld be highly desirable. It was, therefore, that he considered the measure now under discussion of great public importance ; and whatever temporary opposition it might meet with, he conceived that Parliament must ultimately give its sanctioa to the undertaking. Sir Robert Wilsoii expressed a wish that, as regarded the opponents of the measure, every dis- cussion and proceeding might be carried on in the spirit of conciliation. Mr. Spring Rice said, he could state that almost all the commercial bodies in Ireland were favourable to the measure ; and he thought Hon. Members would render a great service to that country by sup- porting the Bill when again brought forward. He considered the Railway would be particularly im- portant in facilitating the intercourse between Man- chester and those districts in Ireland which were already engaged in certain processes of the cotton manufacture. Mr. Holmes read a letter from Lord Lowther, regretting his inability to attend ; also a favourable opinion of Mr. 31' Adam, on the facility of carrying- roads over bogs and mosses ; a question which had occasioned much discussion in the Committee of the House. After some further conversation, 3Ir. Laiurencey as Chairman of the Railway Deputation, having ex- pressed his conviction that the subscribers would be disposed to renew their application to Parliament in 22 the next Session, the following resolution, moved by Mr. Huskisson, and seconded by Mr. W. Peel, was unanimously adopted : — " That it is the opinion of this meeting, that for the purpose of insuring increased facility, cheapness, and despatch in the very extensive intercourse in mer- chandise and manufactured goods between the towns of Liverpool and Manchester, and also in the general trade between this great manufacturing district and Ireland, it is expedient to provide additional and improved means of conveyance between Liverpool and Manchester." The second resolution was proposed by Mr. Spring Rice and seconded by Mr. Bagwell^ " That the failure of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway Bill during the present Session, in conse- quence of the rejecting of two enacting clauses, after the preamble of the Bill had been proved, does not appear to this meeting an event which ought to dis- courage the subscribers from renewing their application the next Session of Parliament, should it appear to the subscribers advisable to carry this important measure." After this resolution was agreed to, the meeting broke up ; and thus terminated the proceedings of the Railway Committee, in connection with their appli- cation to Parliament in the Session of 1825. The interval was short between the labours of this Session and the preliminary steps requisite to be takeu preparatory to the ensuing l^arliamentary campaign. 23 The Committee of the Railway, on the return of their Deputation from London, advertised their intention of adopting " measures for a renewed application to Parliament the ensuing Session :" and on the 1st of July, it was resolved that Mr. John Rennie be re- quested to undertake the office of Engineer to the Company. After some correspondence, it was agreed that Messrs. George and John Rennie should be the Engineers of the Railway ; and Mr. George Rennie, pursuant to instructions, undertook a new survey of the country between Liverpool and Manchester, in order " to report to the Committee the best line for a Railway." On the 12th of August, the Committee, on the recommendation of the Engineers, determined to adopt a new line of way, passing considerably to the south of the former route. In furtherance of this resolution, Mr. Charles Vignoles, on behalf of Messrs. Rennie, was appointed to prepare the necessary sections and plans of the projected undertaking. As these advanced towards completion, it became evident that the cost of the new line would much exceed the former estimate of j^400,000. It became a question, therefore, with the Committee, in what way to raise such additional sum as might be requisite. In an early stage of the undertaking it was proposed to R. H. Bradshaw, Esq. M. P. as Trustee for the Pro- prietors of the Duke of Bridgewater's Canal, to become a shareholder in the Railway. It appeared reasonable that the Proprietors of the Canal Navigations, whose property might be considerably aflected by the estab- 24 lishment of a new mode of conveyance, should have the option of taking part in the projected scheme. Mr. Bradshaw, however, decHned the proposition. If it be inquired why the same offer was not made to the other great Navigation Company (the Mersey and Irwell), the answer is obvious. The Duke of Bridge- water's Canal is private, entailed, and indisposable property ; whereas a Proprietor of the Mersey and Irwell Company had the power, any moment, to reduce his interest in the Water conveyance, and take a share in the Railway, if he so thought fit. The Committee of the Railway, at the present juncture, determined to renew the overture which they had formerly made, but not through the intervention of Mr. Bradshaw. A communication was opened more directly with the Marquis of Stafford, the party beneficially interested in the Duke's Canal, through the medium of James Loch, Esq. M.P. his Lordship's confidential adviser. The proposal was met in the spirit in which it was made ; and, after the discussion of various preliminary points, it was agreed that the Marquis should become a subscriber to the new line of Railway, to the extent of 1000 shares. This arrangement being completed, the Committee lost no time in issuing their second Prospectus, in which the circumstance is made known to the Proprietors and to the public. The following is a copy : — 25 '' LIVERPOOL & MANCHESTER RAILWAY COMPANY. NEW LINE. COMMITTEE. CHARLES LAWRENCE, Esq. Chairman. ROBERT GLADSTONE, Esq.) _ , JOHN MOSS, Esq. ! ^f /'"'^ JOSEPH SANDARS, Esq. J C'"^"-'«^"- ROBERT BENSON, Esq. Liverpool. H. H. BIRLEY, Esq. Manchester. JOSEPH BIRLEY, Esq. Ditto. BEN. BOOTH, Esq. Ditto. HENRY BOOTH, Esq. Liverpool. THOMAS S. BRANDRETH, Esq. Ditto. JOHN EWART, Esq. Ditto. PETER EWART, Esq. Manchester. R. H. GREGG, Esq. Ditto. R. HARRISON, Esq. Liverpool. THOS. HEADLAM, Esq. Liverpool. ADAM HODGSON, Esq. Ditto. ISAAC HODGSON, Esq. Ditto. JOSEPH HORNBY, Esq. Ditto. JOHN KENNEDY, Esq. Manchester. AARON LEES, Esq. Ditto. W. MAXWELL, Esq. Liverpool. WILLIAM POTTER, Esq. Ditto. WILLIAM RATHBONE, Esq. Ditto. WILLIAM ROTHERAM, Esq. Ditto. JOHN RYLE, Esq. Manchester. THOMAS SHARPE, Esq. Ditto. JOHN WILSON. Esq. Liverpool. Parliamentary Agent, Thomas M. Sherwood, Esq. — Engineers, Messrs. George and John Revnie Solicitors, Messrs. Pbitt and CLAy.—Bankeri, Messrs. Moss, Rogers and Moss, Liverpool. CAPITAL £510,000. PROSPECTUS. " The Committee of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway, before entering upon the labours which a renewed application to Parliament will impose upon them, are desirous to advert to the causes which led to the unsuccessful termination of their late efforts ; and, at the same time, briefly to explain the grounds upon which they rest their anticipations of success in the ensuing Session. " A very prominent objection, taken by the opponents of the Bill, was founded on the errors in the section and levels, as exhibited before Parliament. These errors the Committee at once acknowledged and regretted ; and, to avoid all chance of similar complaint in future, theyhave engaged the professional services of most eminent Engineers, aided by assistants of undoubted talents and activity, whose combined efforts justify the fullest assurance, not only of the correctness of the plans and sections, but that the whole line will be laid down and arranged with that skill and conformity with the rules of mechanical science, which will equally challenge approbation, whether con- sidered as a national undertaking of great public utility, or as a magnificent specimen of art. " A second objection to the measure (which, however, was insisted upon out of doors more than in Parliament) was the inter- ruption and inconvenience anticipated from the line of road crossing E 26 various streets in Liverpool and Manchester. This difficulty has been completely obviated. In the new line^ recommended by Messrs. Remiie, the Railway enters Liverpool by means of a tunnel and inclined plane, thus effecting a direct and most desirable communi- cation with the King and Queen's Docks, without interfering with a single street. It does not enter the town of Manchester at all, the line terminating near the New Bailey Prison, in the township of Salford. " A third objection to the measure was taken by the Old Quay Company, on the ground that the Railway interfered with their navigation, by reason of a bridge in the neighbourhood of Manchester, over the River Irwell. The Committee are happy to state that this difficulty is avoided, inasmuch as the new line does not cross the Irwell at all. " A fourth manifestation of opposition was on the part of the Leeds and Liverpool Canal Company, on the ground that the Railway passed under their Canal, in its way to the Prince's Dock. However futile such an objection, it is satisfactory to be enabled to state, that even this assumed ground of opposition is altogether avoided, as the line does not go near the Canal in question. " Another and more plausible objection was founded on the employment of the Locomotive Engine. It was contended, in the first place, that this new and peculiar power was incompetent to perform the task assigned to it ; in the second place, that it was unsafe; and lastly, that in its operation it would prove a public nuisance. By the evidence, however, it was proved that it was perfectly com- petent to perform all that was proposed to be accomplished ; and, before the evidence was closed, the Counsel for the opponents of the Bill admitted that it was safe. Upon the third point of objection, the Committee are confident such improvements will be made in the construction and application of this effective machine, as will obviate all objection on the score of nuisance ; and, as a guarantee of their good faith towards the public, they will not require any clause empowering them to use it, — or they will submit to such restrictions in the employment of it as Parliament may impose, for the satisfaction and ample protection both of proprietors on tlie line of road and of the public at large. 27 " The last, but not the least important objection which the Railway had to encountei*, was on the part of several land-owners on the line. Amongst their opponents, on this ground, the Committee regret they were obliged to number the noble Earls of Derby and Sefton, whose estates the Railway crossed for a considerable distance, as well as others, whose property the line unavoidably intersected. " The Committee most fully admit that the opinions and personal convenience of proprietors on the line of road are entitled to every consideration, and they have been most anxious, by all practicable means, to meet the wishes or to remove the objections of every land- owner on the road. They are happy to be able to state, that they can no longer, in this respect, find an opponent in Lord Sefton, as they do not, in the line of road they are about to apply for, cross any portion of his Lordship's estate. And with reference to the Earl of Derby, they conceive they are entitled to apply the same observation, inasmuch as the new line crosses only a few detached fields of his Lordsliip's property, far removed from the Knowsley domain, and the great turnpike road from Liverpool to Manchester intervening. " With reference to the land-owners generally upon the new line, the Committee have to state, that they have spared no pains to accommodate the exact route to the wishes of propi'ietors whose estates they cross ; whether, on the one hand, by removing the road to a distance from the mansions of proprietors, and from those portions of estates more particularly appropriated to game preserves, or, on the other hand, by introducing it more immediately into the vicinity of districts abounding with coal, which, by this means, will be brought into a cheap and expeditious communication with the Liver- pool and Manchester markets. And they are happy to state, that their efforts in these respects have been in a great measure successful. In an important national undertaking, where a road has to be carried through a populous country for thirty miles, it will hardly be ex- pected that every proprietor will assent, or that no individual will consider himself aggrieved. The Committee have used every effort to render the measure not only unobjectionable, but advantageous to every land-owner on the line. In all cases they are prepared to give a full value for the land they may require ; and, should there be instances where unavoidable inconvenience is occasioned, they 28 are most anxious to admit, that peculiar damage must be met by- peculiar compensation. " In regard to the existing means of conveyance, the Committee are desirous to state, that they are actuated by no hostile feeling to their interest and pi'osperity. They have felt that the increased and increasing trade of the two great towns of Manchester and Liverpool, and the rapidly increasing intercourse with Ireland, demanded ad- ditional facilities in the means of transit ; and the professed and sincere desire of the Committee has been confined to supply this want. The Committee have the satisfaction of being able to state, that, in accordance with this feeling, the opposition of the most powerful of the existing establishments has been removed, by the Marquis of Stafford having, for himself and those of his family who are bene- ficially interested in the profits of the Duke of Bridgewater's Canal, become a subscriber to the Railway to the extent of One Thousand Shares. Being satisfied that the proceedings of last Session of Par- liament have removed the misapprehensions which existed, both in regard to the nature and the management of the Bridgewater Canal, they felt it would be unfit to continue their opposition to the pro- posed measure in its improved form. " Having thus disposed of the objections and difficulties which the Committee have had to encounter, they will briefly advert to those prominent and unequivocal advantages of the measure upon which they rest their claim to the favour of the public, and the sanction of Parliament. " In their prospectus of last year, the Committee stated ' the total quantity of merchandise passing between Liverpool and Man- chester at one thotisaiid tons per day." This quantity, it would seem, is underrated, the whole traffic being admitted, on all hands, in Committee of the House of Commons, to be 1200 tons per diem; which immense aggregate tonnage is, at present, subject to all the delays incidental to the river navigation. " The Committee of the Railway pi'opose to effect the transit of merchandise in a few hours, with uniform regularity, and at such reduced rates as will secure to the towns of Liverpool and Man- chester a pecuniary saving, which, whether estimated in proportion to the expenditure upon which it is efl'ected, or v;ith reference to the 29 aggregate amount, has seldom been equalled in any scheme of im- provement submitted to the public. " Neither is the immediate pecuniary saving to the towns of Liverpool and Manchester to be estimated with reference merely to the cost of conveying merchandise between the respective towns. The travelling between Liverpool and Manchester is upon the most extensive scale ; and the economy to be effected in this branch of expenditure, though impossible to be estimated with accuracy, must be considered as most important, and, of itself, no small recommenda- tion of the undertaking. " The advantages, however, above enumerated are only a part of the beneficial results which this scheme proposes. The line of Railway, as now laid down, passes through a rich and extensive coal district, in full working, for the supply of Liverpool, and requiring only a facility of transport to be brought into requisition for the supply of Manchester. At a moderate computation, Liverpool requires for its local consumption gOO tons of coal per day, besides what is re- quired for foreign commerce, and for the numerous steam-packets which sail dally through the season between Liverpool and various ports in Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. An aggregate consumption of 500,000 tons per annum may be taken as under the mark. Of this large quantity, a considerable proportion is brought to market by land carriage ; extensive fields of coal in the direct line of the Railway having no other means of access to Liverpool. With reference to Manchester, the ordinary consumption for domestic purposes maybe considered the same as in Liverpool, and the quantity used in the extensive factories of that town may be computed as equivalent to the demand for the steam vessels, and for the export trade at Liverpool : the aggregate consumption, therefore, of the two towns may be estimated, with sufficient accuracy, at one million of tons per annum. " The importance to the community of a moderate price to be paid for an article of such extensive and universal consumption is imme- diately apparent ; and some idea of the benefit to be derived from such a facility of transport as may ensure a more enlarged and effectual competition may be formed from the circumstance, that in Manchester the price of coals was advanced Is. Cd. per ton imme- diately upon the Railway Bill being withdrawn in the last Session of 30 Parliament ; while in Liverpool, within the last thirty-five years, the price of the best coal has been advanced upwards of 7s. per ton, that is, nearly 100 per cent. But, estimating the reduction in the price of this article at 2s. per ton, here is a saving of £100,000. per annum (an amount equal to the whole assessed taxes of the two towns) effected upon a single article, not of luxury, and confined to the higher or mercantile classes of the community, but an article of the first necessity, of daily and hourly consumption, and forming no small item in the expenditure of eveiy poor man's family. " Moreover, it would be to take a very narrow and imperfect view of the great question now under discussion, to limit our con- sideration to the immediate accommodation of the mercantile classes, to the pecuniary saving proposed to the travelling community, or even to the still more important saving to the consumers of coals, and of every desci'iption of goods conveyed between Liverpool and Man- chester. The question demands a wider survey and the consideration of more distant results. We must contemplate the important effects upon the commerce of the nation, which are to be anticipated, on the one hand, from affarding, or, on the other hand, from denying facilities to the commercial operations of this great county. Above all, we must look to Ireland, the natural granary of the manufac- turing districts of this country. To the sister kingdom a facility of intercourse and conveyance between Liverpool and the interior of Lancashire and Yorkshire is of paramount importance ; in the first place, for the cheap and regular transport of her agricultural produce; and secondly, for the rapid transit of cotton and woollen goods in different stages of their manufacture, which alone seems wanting to foster the growing industry of Ireland; to give to her some pro- portionate advantage for her clieap labour, and thus render her an auxiliary and an helpmate to the more stable manufacturing estab- lishments of this country. " But the subject does not end here. It becomes a question of serious import whether this country, which is indebted for so much of her wealth, and power, and greatness, to the bold and judicious application of mechanical science, shall noAv pause in the career of improvement, while it is notorious that other nations will adopt the means of aggrandisement which we reject, — whether England shall 31 relinquish the high vantage ground she at present possesses,, not more with a reference to the direct operations of commerce and manufactures, than, generally, in the successful application of the most important principles of science and of art. " The Committee feel that it is unnecessary to dwell at greater length on the question they have thus brought before the public. They are about to apply for the sanction of the legislature ; and they are determined to relax no efforts on their part to bring about the honourable and speedy accomplishment of the great work in which they have engaged. " Charles Lawrence, Chairman. " Liverpool, December 2C, 1825." The time was now arrived when the question was again to be brought under the consideration of the legislature. A Deputation from the Railway Com- mittee accordingly assembled in London in the first week in February, 1826. On the 7th of February, the Petition for the Bill was presented to the House of Commons by General Gascoyne. On the 9th, the compliance with the standing orders was proved in Committee. On the 10th, the Bill was read 2i first time in the House of Commons. On the 20th, it was read a second time, without discussion. On March 6, Mr. Counsellor Adam made his opening speech in Committee, and on the same side were Mr. Sergeant Spankie, Mr. Joy, and Mr. W. Brougham. After the estimates and other evidence in the En- gineering department had been recorded, the general evidence in favour of the Bill, and with reference to 32 the trade and commerce of the two towns, occupied two days. On the 9th of March, Mr. Spankie summed up, and Mr. Counsellor Earle opened his case on behalf of the opponents. The injury to be apprehended to certain land-owners on the line of Railway, and the competency of the Canal Companies to carry on the trade between Liverpool and Manchester, were the topics principally enforced. On the 15th of March, Mr. Harrison, for the Canals, summed up, in a speech of two hours, the burden of -which was, that the Railway, as a conveyance, would be neither cheap nor expeditious ; that it would be a grievous injury to the land-owners on the line, and at the same time ruinous to the projectors themselves. On the 16th of March, Mr. Adam replied; after which the room was cleared, and on the division, the Preamble of the Bill was voted to be proved^ by a majority of 43 to 18. On the Gth of April, the Bill was read a third time in the House of Commons. The debate on this occasion was spirited ; General Gascoyne moved the third reading, seconded by Mr. W. Peel ; the Hon. Edward Stanley moved that the Bill be read that day six months, and was seconded by Sir Isaac Coffin. Mr. Huskisson and Sir John Newport spoke in favour of the Bill ; and Mr. Philips (now Sir Geo. Philips) and Capt. I. Bradshaw against it. On the division, the numbers were 88 in favour, 41 against — majority 47. On the 7th of April, the Bill was read a first time in the House of Lords. On the 10th of April, Lord Dacre moved the second 33 reading, when the Earl of Derby declared his intention to oppose the Bill in Committee, though he should not object to the second reading. On the 13th of April, Mr. Adam opened the case for the Railway in the Committee of the Lords, thirty- three Peers being present, Lord Kenyon having con- sented to take the chair. The evidence, on both sides, was similar in effect to that offered to the House of Commons. On the subject of the Locomotive Engine, however — a machine which had been represented to the House of Commons in so formidable a light, — evidence was brought forward by the opponents of the Bill ; but so poor a case was made, and so little objec- tionable did the Engine appear to be, even from the testimony of the opponents, that the Lords did not think it necessary to hear any evidence on the other side, although it was tendered by the Counsel for the Bill. On the 20th of April, Mr. Sergeant Spankie summed up, on behalf of the Railway, and Mr. Alderson opened in opposition. On the 27th of April, Mr. Harrison summed up for the opponents, and Mr. Adam replied ; after which, the Committee adjourned till the 1st of May. On that day the Committee of the Lords re-assem- bled, thirty-two Peers being present. On a division, the preamble was declared to be proved, the numbers being 30 in favour — 2 against. Amongst the Peers in favour of the Bill were Lord Kenyon, the Earl of Lonsdale, the Bishop of Bath 34 and Wells, the Bishop of Chester (now Bishop of London), the Marquis of Salisbury, Earl of Cassiliis, Lord Dacre, Earl of Caernarvon, &c. &c. The Earl of Derby and the Earl of Wilton were the opposing parties. The Bill was then read a third time in the Lords, and passed without a division. Such is a brief outline of the Parliamelitary pro- ceedings on the Liverpool and Manchester Railway Bill ; a measure which called into activity very power- ful and conflicting interests. It could not, indeed, be expected that wealthy and long-established Companies, exercising their joint monopolies by prescriptive right and undisputed usage, could contemplate with the liberality of advocates for free trade the establish- ment of a Company great and powerful as themselves, for the avowed purpose of carrying on, by land, that mighty traffic and interchange of commodities between Liverpool and Manchester, which had been so long and so profitably carried on by water. To put down, in limine, a scheme so startling in its character, and withal so full of unknown consequences, was an object worthy of a strenuous and combined effort. The attempt was accordingly made : no labour was spared, no expedient left untried, no expenditure withheld. The greatness of the effort, however, on the one side, called forth proportionate exertion on the other. The aggregate pecuniary cost entailed on the parties con- cerned in the contest, was not less than from sixty to seventy thousand pounds : it has been estimated much higher. But the contest is over, and the result will be satisfactory to all who contemplate with pleasure the 35 commercial prosperity of the country, or who take an interest in marking those great steps in the progress of mechanical science, the successful study and varied application of which, to arts and manufactures, have contributed in no small degree to raise this country to its present pre-eminence in wealth, power, and civilization. 36 CHAPTER II. rORMATION OF THE RAILWAY AND EXPENDITURE. The first General Meeting of Subscribers, under the authority of the Act, was held in Liverpool on the 29th of May, 1826, when twelve Directors were chosen by the Proj)rietors, in conjunction with three Directors nominated by the Marquis of Stafford, to carry into effect the formation of the projected Railway. The first meeting of Directors was on the following day, when Charles Lawrence, Esq. was elected Chairman, and John Moss, Esq. Deputy Chairman ; and the Board immediately took into consideration the choice of a Principal Engineer. It was obvious, that in aa undertaking of such magnitude, ?l resident l^w^meev oi experience and ability was indispensable ; and the Directors naturally turned their attention to Mr. Stephenson, of Newcastle, a gentleman thoroughly ac- quainted with practical mechanics, and possessing more experience in the construction and working of Railways than perhaps any other individual. The Directors, at the same time, wrote to Messrs. Geo. and John Rennie, requesting them to undertake the professional super- intendence of the undertaking On the 17th of June, Mr. Geo. Rennie had an interview with the Directors, on which occasion the subject was discussed ; and, in conclusion, Mr. Rennie proposed to the Directors to 37 superintend the execution of the work, making six visits per annum, and remaining on the ground seven or ten days at each visit, but stipulating, at the same time, that the resident Engineer should be of his own appointing. On the 19th of June, the Directors took Mr. Rennie's proposition into consideration. They would have been glad of the professional assistance of Mr. Rennie, but it was their duty to take advantage of the best practical knowledge within their reach. The trust reposed in them, and the responsibility attaching to its due fulfilment, were too weighty to allow of their being much influenced by ordinary punctilios. Their course was direct to the great object they had in view. Mr. Ronnie's proposition was respectfully declined, and Mr. George Stephenson was elected Principal Engineer to the Company. The first point of actual operation was on Chat Moss, where the draining was commenced in June, 1826. The first shaft of the Liverpool Tunnel was opened in September of the same year, but very little progress was made in either of these departments of the work during 1826; and the earth-work (com- prising the cuttings and embankings along the whole line) was not commenced till January, 1827. It will not be surprising that some delay should take place in the first instance, before a sufficient quantity of waggons, implements, and materials could be con- structed or collected, to enable the Engineer to make much progress in the execution of the work. In Mechanics, it is found that it is not easy to put great weights speedily into rapid movement ; and a variety 38 of impediments must generally be encountered at the commencement of great undertakings. In the case of the Railway, the purchase of land was a preliminary step, requiring time and consideration to accomplish. Early in 1827, however, the machine was fairly in motion ; the necessary arrangements were made ; assistant Engineers were appointed ; and operations in various parts of the line were in progress. One of the objects of the Directors, in the summer of 1826, had been to make arrangements to obtain a loan of ^100,000. from the Exchequer Loan Com- missioners, appointed by the authority of Parliament to aid the completion of public works by the loan of money, under proper securities for its repayment by instalments, in a series of years. On a correspondence with the Commissioners, it was considered necessary to have the authority of a special Act of Parliament for the purpose ; and accordingly, a General Meeting of Proprietors, on the 11th of December, 1826, em- powered the Directors of the Railway to apply to Parliament for an Act to authorise the loan in question. The Act was obtained in the spring of 1827, and in June of the same year 5^100,000. was received from the Commissioners. With the aid of this loan, in addition to the several calls on the Subscribers, the Directors were enabled to push forward the work with more than ordinary vigour, and consequently to give employment to an increased number of labourers, which, at the period in question, and under the cir- cumstances of the time, was an object of no small importance. 59 During the whole of the year 1827, the formation of the Tunnel under Liverpool was carried forward with spirit and perseverance. Night and day the excavation proceeded, and many difficulties in the execution of the workhad to be overcome. In someplacesthe substance excavated was a soft blue shale, with abundance of water ; in other places a wet sand presented itself, re^ quiring no slight labour and contrivance to support till the masonry which was to form the roof was erected. In passingunderCrown-street, neartheBotanicGarden, for want of sufficient props the superincumbent mass fell in from the surface, being a depth of 30 feet, of loose moss-earth and sand.* On some occasions the miners refused to work, and it not unfrequently required the personal superintendence and encouragement of the Engineer to keep them at their posts. Nor is this surprising, considering the nature of the operation 1 boring their way almost in the dark, with the water streaming around them, and uncertain whether the props and stays would bear the pressure from above till the arch-work should be completed. Those who visit the Tunnel in its present state, illuminated with gas-lights, and traversed by horses, carriages, and crowds of passengers, will not easily picture to them^ selves the onginal dark and dangerous cavern, with the roof and sides supported by shores, while the miners pursued their arduous task by the light of a few candles, whose feeble glimmer glancing on the water which ran down the sides, or which spread out • This happened while the Engineer was absent from Liverpool. 4P in a sheet below, was barely sufficient to show the dreariness of the place. But while some portions of the Tunnel were excavated under circumstances of no little difficulty and danger, and requiring all the skill and energy of the Engineer to accomplish, other portions were hewn through a fine red sand-stone, clean, dry, and substantial, and requiring neither props nor artificial arching; the natural rock forming the roof of the excavation. The Tunnel was constructed in seven or eight separate lengths, communicating with the surface by upright shafts, through which the substance excavated was conveyed away. The exact joinings of these different lengths, so as to form one complete whole, as now exhibited, was, of course, from time to time an object of considerable interest, and to the Directors of some anxiety ; and the accuracy with which this was effected is highly creditable to the Engineer, and to Mr. Locke, the Assistant Engineer for that department. Nearly two-thirds of the Tunnel were completed in 1827, at an expense of twenty thousand pounds; and about the same money was expended in the cuttings and embankings along the line. The total expendi- ture of the Company on the 31st of December, 1827, including the cost of obtaining the Act of Parliament, and other preliminary disbursements, was ^212,855. 19s. 8d. Early in the year 1828, it became evident, notwith- standing this large expenditure, that the progress of the works was not advancing with that celerity which was to be desired. On the earth-work, the estimate 41 of which amounted to £138,000., only ^20,000. had been expended at the close of 1827. The Directors became fully sensible of the importance of expediting the whole work. The interest on the capital expended, and the loss of all income till the Railway, or at least a considerable portion of it should be completed, afforded motive sufficient to induce the Company to push forward the operations with still increasing speed. In the spring of this year (1828) the Directors obtained an Act of Parliament for altering the line of roadjimproving the curves, and shortening the distance, by avoiding several circuitous routes, as laid down in the Parliamentary plan. The improved parts of the road are comprised between certain lands in the township of Sutton, near Rainhill, and that part of the line situate in Culcheth, near Bury-lane. On the 9th of June, 1828, it was reported to the Directors that the last joining between the several lengths of the Tunnel was effected, and at that time all very serious difficulties in the execution of this branch of the undertaking were surmounted. In this year principally, was effected the piling for the foundations of the piers of the great Viaduct over the Sankey valley, a business of much labour and cost, but indispensable for the security of the superstructure. About two hundred piles, varying from 20 to 30 feet in length, were driven hard into the foundation site of each of the ten piers. The heavy ram employed to impart the finishing strokes, hoisted up with double purchase and snail's pace to the summit of the Piling Engine, and then falling down like a thunderbolt on the head G 42 of the devoted timber, driving it perhaps a single half inch into the stratum below, is well calculated to put to the test the virtue of patience, while it illustrates the old adage of — *' slow and sure." The Viaduct com- prises nine arches of 50 feet span each, stretching across the valley of the Sankey, over which the Railway was to be carried, at a height of nearly 70 feet above the level of the Sankey Canal. During the present year (1828), was completed the Company's bridge over the turnpike road and the old Mill Dam at Newton, and the operations on Chat Moss were carried on without intermission, embanking at each end, and draining, levelling, &c. on the centre portions. On the .315^ of December, 1828, the total expendi- ture was j^46I,899. 19s. 6d., which included the following items : — On account of Chat Moss ^17,503 7 3 „ Cuttings &Embankings 84,565 19 3 Tunnel 33,937 14 2 Sankey Viaduct 32,223 6 9 Land 101,962 9 11 „ Iron Rails, Chairs, &c. 63,010 3 10 Early in the year 1829, the Directors, with the sanction of the Proprietors, applied to Parliament and obtained their fourth Act, the purport of which was — first, to improve the termination of the line at the Manchester end, by carrying the Railway in a more direct course over the Irwell into Manchester, instead of allowing it to terminate near the New Bailey, in Salford, as set out in the original plan. This alteration was a great improvement, as it brought the Railway 43 to a station in Water-street, in the centre of the great Carrying Companies' Establishments ; affording, at the same time, convenient access to the different parts of Manchester, whether with a view to merchandise laden in the Railway waggons, or passengers arriving in the Railway coaches. Another important object of the Act of the present year was to authorise the Company to raise an ad- ditional capital of ^127,500. by 5100 £25. shares, each holder of an original b^IOO. share being entitled to one i§'25. share. The purpose of this new fund was to enable the Company to provide depots, machinery, waggons, carriages, &c. with all appurtenances be- longing to a Carrying Department ; for it is to be observed, that the original Railway Act requires the Company to be carriers, though it does not provide the means of carrying. That the raising of this additional capital was deemed expedient by the Pro- prietors at large, may be inferred from the circumstance that only fifteen of the new shares (out of 5100) were declined by the parties entitled to them, under the Act. In the spring of 1829, the Directors were still anxious for increased despatch in the execution of the work, and the Engineer, in consequence, was instructed to order the Contractors at the principal cuttings throughout the line, to employ two sets of labourers, and to work by night as well as day. The operations accordingly proceeded still more rapidly than here- tofore, though it must be allowed at considerably increased expense ; and had it not been for an extra- ordinary wet summer and autumn, the earth-work for 44 a complete line of communication between Liverpool and Manchester might have been accomplished by the end of 1829, or the beginning of 1830, and the Railway laid down for operations within a few months from that period. As it was, very considerable delay was occasioned by the heavy and long-continued rains, besides no triflingexpense to the Company, in pumping the water from the deep cuttings, which were too apt to assume the appearance of a Canal rather than a Railway. The principal structure completed in 1829, was the Company's bridge to carry the Liverpool and War- rington turnpike road over the Railway at Rainhill. The line of the public road at this place, crosses the Jlailway in an oblique direction, at an angle of 34 degrees, the span of the arch being 54 feet, while the breadth of the Railway under the bridge is only 30 feet. It is called a Skew Bridge, in popular phraseology, and is a very fine specimen of this kind of building, every stone of the arch being shaped with angles and curve adapted to the position in which it is placed. The Winton bridge, over the public road, nearEccles, is a very neat specimen of the same style of arch, but \yithout the massive grandeur of the bridge at Rainhill. In the present year, one road-way was laid along the whole extent of Chat Moss, and the Rocket Steam Engine, with a carriage and company, passed over it on the first day of 1830. The practicability of carrying the Railway over this Moss was seriously questioned in the House of Comnions, and was honestly doubted hy numbers who were acquainted with the soft and 45 pulpy state of this huge bog — in some places 30 to 35 feet deep — and so fluid, that an iron rod would sink through the Moss by its own gravity. The Railway, indeed, for the most part, floats on the surface, its compactness and buoyancy in the most fluid places being assisted by hurdles of brushwood and heather, laid under the wood sleepers which support the rails. The portion of the Moss which presented the most difficulty in its completion was about half a mile on the east border, where an embankment of about 20 feet had to be formed above the natural level. The weight of this embankment resting on a semi-fluid base, pressed down the original surface: many thou- sand cubic yards gradually and silently disappeared, before the line of road made any approach to the proposed level. By degrees, however, the whole mass beneath and on each side of this embankment became consolidated by the superincumbent and lateral pressure, and a little perseverance finally com- pleted the work. In September, 1829, was commenced the Company's bridge over the Irwell, in the improved line of road authorised by the Act of that year. This was the last great structure on the line of Railway from Liverpool to Manchester. In the appendix will be found a general abstract of the total expenditure of the Railway, showing the cost of the different branches of the undertaking. This document may not be without interest to those who shall hereafter embark in similar adventures ; though it will be evident that no very exact rule of com- 46 parison can be laid down, whereby to estimate the cost of different Railways; for not only have the wages of labour and the expense of materials to be taken into the account, but especially, the time and circumstances under which the work has to be accom- plished — whether, notwithstanding unfavourable sea- sons, considerations of the earlier opening of the road, and more speedy acquisition of a profitable income, may still justify the prosecution of the work with una- bated vigour— by night as well as by day — even at the increased expense which will thereby unavoidably be incurred. The Liverpool and Manchester Railway is a magnificent work ; but it will be useful to keep in mind that such works cannot be executed except at an expenditure of no ordinary magnitude. This Railway will cost above ^800,000., including the charge for stations and depots at each end, and machinery, engines, waggons, &c. for a carrying department. The immense traflfic between Liverpool and Manchester amply justifies this outlay. But with reference to any similar scheme, in extension of the Railway system, it is desirable the projectors should impartially calculate the cost of the work, as well as the income it may be expected to produce; and especially that they should make an ample allowance beyond the first estimate of the expenditure, before they embark in the undertakijig. 47 CHAPTER III. DESCRIPTION' OF THE RAILWAV—EXCURSIOX FROM LIVERPOOL TO MANCHESTER. There is so little in scenery that is interesting on the turnpike road from Liverpool to Manchester, that a formal description of the way between the two towns may appear to be rather an unpromising undertaking. The traveller along the Railway, however, will speedily admit that there is little similitude between the two routes ; the whole character, structure, and appearance of the Railway being altogether different from the general aspect of the turnpike road. Instead of a uniform, flat, and uninteresting country, the line of Railway is diversified continually by hill and dale, offered to the contemplation of the traveller in a sort of inverse presentment ; the passenger by this new line of route having to traverse the deepest recesses, where the natural surface of the ground is the highest, and being mounted on the loftiest ridges and highest em- bankments, riding above the tops of the trees, and over- looking the surrounding country, where the natural surface of the ground is the lowest, — this peculiarity and this variety being occasioned by that essential requisite in a well-constructed Railway — a level line- imposing the necessity of cutting through the high lands and embanking across tlie low ; thus, in effect, 48 presenting to the traveller all the variety of mountain and ravine in pleasing succession, whilst in reality he is moving almost on a level plane, and while the natural face of the country scarcely exhibits even those slight undulations which are necessary to relieve it from tameness and insipidity. To accomplish a complete survey of the Railway, we should commence our journey of observation at the Liverpool end, in the Company's yard, in Wapping. Here the lower entrance of the great Tunnel is acces- sible through an open cutting, 22 feet deep and 46 feet wide, being space for four lines of Railway, with pillars between the lines to support the beams and flooring of the Company's warehouses, which are thrown across this excavation, and under which the waggons pass to be loaded or discharged through hatchways or trap doors communicating with the stores above; waggons loaded with coal or lime passing underneath the warehouses to the open wharfs at the Wapping end of the station. Proceeding along the Tunnel, the line of Railway curves to the right, or south-east, till it reaches the bottom of the inclined plane, which is a perfectly straight line, 1980 yards in length, with a uniform rise of three-quarters of an inch to a yard. The Railway from Wapping to the commencement of the inclined plane is level ; the whole rise, therefore, from Wapping to the Tunnel mouth, at Edge-hill, is 123 feet. The Tunnel is 22 feet wide and 16 feet high, the sides being perpendicular for five feet in height, surmounted by a semicircular arch of 1 1 feet radius : the total 4,0 length is 2250 yards. It is cut through various strata of red rock, blue shale and clay, but principally through rock of every degree of hardness, from the softest sand-stone to the most compact free-stone, which the axe or the chisel will with difficulty penetrate. It frequently was found necessary, in the progress of the work, to make an artificial vault of masonry, which has been effected by brick arch-work in those places where the natural rock could not be trusted to support the superincumbent mass. The height from the roof of the Tunnel upwards to the open surface of the ground, varies from 5 feet to 70, the greatest mass of superstratum being in the vicinity of Hope-street and Crabtree-lane. The whole length of this vast cavern is now furnished \\ith gas-lights, and the sides and roof are tv/iiteivas/ied, to give better effect to the illumination. The different colours and peculiar ap- pearance of the varying strata through which the Tunnel passes are thus hidden from view, and the attention is no longer attracted to those faults or slips in the solid rock, which indicate that the whole mass has been rent asunder by one or more of those terrible convulsions of nature, of which the traces are so fre- quently visible, but of v^hich no other record remains. The geologist will be disappointed, in traversing this subterranean vault, to find the natural varieties con- verted by lime-water into one uniform and artificial appearance; but the principle of utility is paramount in a commercial undertaking. At the upper or eastern end of the Tunnel, the traveller emerges into a spacious and noble area, 40 H 50 feet below the surface of the ground, cut out of the soiid rock, and surmounted on every side by walls dnd battlements. From this area there returns a small funnel, 290 yards in length, 15 feet wide, and 12 feet high, parallel with the large one, but inclining upwards in the opposite direction, and terminating in the Company's premises in Crown-street, at the upper and eastern boundary of Liverpool ; being the principal station for the Railway coaches, and the depot for ^als for the supply of the higher districts of the town. Proceeding eastward from the two Tunnels, the road pMSses through a Moorish archway, at present un- finished, which is to connect the two Engine-houses, and will form the grand entrance to the Liverpool stations. Tliis structure is from a spirited design of Mr. Foster's, a representation of which I have placed as a suitable Fn ntispiece to this account of the Railway. The tra- veller now find shimselfontheopen road to Manchester, and has an opportunity of contemplating the peculiar fearures of a well-constructed Railway, the line in this pla ;e being perfectly level ; the slight curve, which was uni voidable, beautifully set out; the road-way clean, dr} ,and free from obstructions; and therailsfirmly fixed on Massive blocks of stone. Crossing Wavertree-lane, the Railway descends for 5^ miles at the rate of four fee in the mile, — a declivity so slight and uniform as vot to be perceived by the eye, but still sufficient to give a mechanical advantage and facility of motion to 1 load passing in that direction. The road a little be; end Wavertree-lane is carried through a deep raarle cutting, under several massive stone archways, 51 thrown across the excavation to form the requisite communications between the roads and farms on the opposite sides of the Railway. Beyond the marie cutting is the great rock excavation through Olive Mount, about half a mile to the north of the village of Wavertree. Here the traveller passes through a deep and narrow ravine, 70 feet below the surface of the ground, little more space being opened out tian sufficient for two trains of carriages to pass each other ; and the road winding gently round towards the south- east, the j)rospect is bounded by the perpendicular rock on either side, with the blue vault above, relieved at intervals by a bridge high over head, connecting the opposite precipices. The sides of the rock exhibit already the green surface of vegetation, and present altogether far more of the picturesque in their appear- ance than might be expected from so recent an excavation. At night, when the natural gloom of the place is further deepened, the scene from the bridge ; above will readily be imagined to be novel and striking The light of the moon illuminating about half tb^ depth, and casting a darker shade on the area below— the general silence interrupted at intervals by a noise like distant thunder — presently a train of carriages, led on by an Engine of fire and steam, with her lamps like two furnaces, throwing their light onward in dazzling signal of their approach — with the strength and speed of a war-horse the Engine moves forward with its glorious cavalcade of merchandise from all countries and passengers of all nations. But the spectacle is transient as striking; in a moment the 52 pageant is gone — tlie meteor is passed ; tlie flaring of the lamps is only seen in the distance, and the observer, looking down from the battlement above, perceives that all again is still and dark and solitary. Emerging from the Olive Mount cutting, you approach the great Roby embankment, formed of the materials dug outof the excavation we have described. This embankment stretches across the valley for about two miles, varying in height from 15 to 45 feet, and in breadth at the base from 60 to 135 feet. Here the traveller finds himself affected by sensations the very reverse of what he felt a few minutes before. Mounted above the tops of the trees, he looks around him over a wide expanse of country, in the full enjoyment of the fresh breeze, from whatever quarter it may blow. This vast embankment strikingly exhibits how much may be accomplished when our efforts are concen- trated on one grand object. There is a feeling of satisfaction by no means common-place, in thus over- coming obstacles and surmounting difficulties, in making the high places low and the rough places plain, and advancing in one straight and direct course to the end in view ; while the pleasure afforded by the contemplation of this great work is further en- lianced, when considered in contrast with ordinary and every-day impressions. After passing the Roby embankment you cross the Huyton turnpike road, leaving liuyton Church and village on the left hand, and proceed in a slightly curved direction to the bottom of the inclined plane at Whistou, between seven and eight miles from the 53 Company's station in Liverpool. This plane rises in the ratio of three-eighths of an inch in a yard, (or 1 in 96.) It is a mile and a half long in one straight line, and the inclination (being so slight) would scarcely attract observation, did not a decrease in the speed of the carriages indicate that an important change had taken place in the level of the way. At the top of the Whiston inclined plane there is a portion of the road (nearly two miles in length) on the exact level. About half a mile from the top of the inclined plane, the turnpike road from Liverpool to Manchester crosses the line of the Railway at an acute angle of 34 degrees, and is carried over the Railway by a substantial stone bridge, of very curious and beautiful construction, being built on the diagonal or skew principle, each stone being cut to a particular angle to fit into a par- ticular place, the span of the arch, measured at the face, being 54 feet, while the width of the Railway underneath, measured from wall to wall, is only 30 feel, — each face of the arch extending diagonally 45 feet beyond the square. Rainhill bridge is nine miles from the Company's yard in Wapping, and it was underneath and on each side of this bridge that the experiments took place with the Locomotive Engines which contended for the premium ofX'500. in October, 1829. Passing over the summit level at Rainhill, we come to the Sutton inclined plane, which descends in the opposite direction, and is similar in extent and incli- nation to the Whiston plane, the top level being 82 feet above the base of each plane. Par Moss is the 54 next object of attention, the road-way across the principal part of it being formed by the deposit of heavy material (clay and stone) dug out of the Sutton inclined plane. This Moss is about 20 feet deep, and the material forming the Railway, as it was deposited, sank to the bottom, and now forms an embankment in reality 25 feet high, though only four or five feet appears above the surface of the Moss. The borders of this waste are in a state of increasing cultivation, and the carrying of the Railway across this Moss will hasten the inclosure of the whole area. Leaving Par Moss, we soon approach the great valley of the Sankey (about half way between Liver- pool and Manchester), with its Canal at the bottom, and its flats or barges in full sail passing to and fro, between the River Mersey, near Warrington, and the great Coal districts near St. Helen's. Over this valley and Canal, and over the topmasts and high peaks of the barges, the Railway is carried along a magnificent viaduct of nine arches, each 50 feet span, built princi- pally of brick, with stone facings, the height from the top of the parapets to the water in the Canal being 70 feet, and the width of the Railway between the parapets 25 feet. The approach to this great structure is along a stupendous embankment, formed principally of clay, dug out from the high lands on the borders of the valley. Looking over the battlements, there is a fine view down the valley to the south — Win wick spire rishig in the distance, and below you, the little stream of the Sankey running parallel with the Canal ; while the masts and sails of the vessels, 55 seen at intervals in the landscape ^vhere the Canal is no longer visible, present a vivid specimen of inland navigation. Immediately below you, the barges, as they approach the bridge, escape from view for a few minutes, till, having sailed under your feet, they become again visible on the opposite side of the viaduct. On leaving the Sankey, we speedily approach the town of Newton, or rather the borough ; for this ancient and loyal place sends two representatives to Parliament, under the auspices of Colonel Legh, M. P. A few hundred yards to the south of the town, the Railway crosses a narrow valley by a short but lofty embankment, and a handsome bridge of four arches, each 40 feet span. Under the eastern arch the turn- pike road passes from Newton to Warrington, and beneath another arch flows a stream which turns all old corn mill, immediately below the bridge. Adjacent also, is situate one of those antique mansions, built in the ancient baronial style, whose white exterior, with black oak crossings and pointed gables, harmonizes well witli the rude scenery around. A few miles beyond Newton is the great Kenyotl excavation, from which about 800,000 cubic yards of clay and sand have been dug out, part being carried to form the line of embankment to the east and west of the cutting; and the remainder,deposited as spoil banks, may be seen heaped up, like Pelion upon Ossa, towering over tlie adjacent land. Near the end of this cutting, tlieKenyon and Leigh Junction Rail way joins the Liver^ pool and Manchester line by two branches, pointing to the two towns respectively. This Railway joins the 56 Bolton and Loic^h line, and thus forms the connectinjr link between Bolton, Liverpool, and Manchester. From the Kenyon excavation the transition is easy to the Brosely embankment, formed of the material dug- out of the cutting, as before described. Moving onward, we pass over Bury-lane and the small River Gless, or Glazebrook, being arrived on the borders of the far-famed Chat Moss. This barren waste com- prises an area of about twelve square miles, varying in depth from 10 to 35 feet, the whole mass being of so spongy and soft a texture that cattle cannot walk over it. The bottom is composed of clay and sand, and it is not an uninteresting, if not a very profitable specu- lation, to carry our ideas back to that remote period when the sea flowed over the basin of this huffefunjjus. There are they who profess, by examining the vege- table fibre of the Moss, to calculate its age; as the fortune-teller will cast your nativity by the furrows in your hand. No doubt this mass of vegetable matter is still increasing. The flower and the leaf of the heather still bud, grow to maturity, and fall ; and the process of decomposition amalgamates the new and the old fibre ; but what is thus deposited has been previously extracted from the Moss, save what has been supplied from the hydrogen and other gases absorbed and combined in this great laboratory. At a very moderate calculation, Chat Moss comprises sixty millions of tons of vegetable matter; and we shall leave to philosophers to calculate in how many centuries this weight could be drawn from the clouds and the air. Northward of the Moss, in the distance, 57 is Tildsley Church, one of the modern Parliamentary edifices ; and as we approach the eastern boundary, conspicuous on a gentle eminence to the left, is Worsley Hall, the seat of R. H. Bradshaw, Esq. M.P. so well known as Trustee for the management of the Duke of Bridgewater's Canal. Beyond Chat Moss we traverse the Barton embank- ment, crossing the low lands for about a mile between the Moss and the Worsley Canal, over which the Railway is carried by a neat stone bridge. At this spot it is evident you are approaching a manufacturing district. On the banks of the Canal a great cotton factory rears its tall sides, with its hundred windows, and the fly-wheel of its steam-engine pursuing its continuous and uniform revolutions, as if symbolical of that eternal round of labour and care, of abundant toil and scanty remuneration, of strained exertion and insufiicient repose, which, through day and night, through seed time and harvest, through years of civili- zation and ages of barbarism, have been the condition and tenure on which the existence of so large a portion of mankind has depended. From the Barton embankment we soon arrive at Eccles, four miles from Manchester, leaving to the right the vicarage and parish church of that village. Between this place and Manchester the Railway passes at no great distance from several country seats and villas, whose rich lawns and flourishing plantations afford an agreeable variety, after the great sand hills at Kenyon, or the wide waste of Chat Moss. The immediate approach to Manchester, by the I 58 Railway, is through a portion of Salford, as little inter- esting as can well be imagined. Over the River Irwell the Railway is carried by a very handsome stone bridge, and then over a series of arches, into the Com- pany's station in Water-street and Liverpool-road, Manchester; from which the traveller whose object is pleasure rather than business, will probably make his way, without loss of time, to the more genial attrac- tions of the Albion Hotel, or New Bridgewater Arms. 59 CHAPTER IV. MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES AND PROPERTIES. A3 APPLICABLE TO RAILWAYS. The most obvious mechanical advantage which a Railway possesses over a common turnpike road, is to be found in its superior hardness and smoothness of surface. This comparative advantage, it is evident, can be measured by no fixed standard ; though it is common to estimate it in the proportion of seven to one. It should constantly be borne in mind, however, that this ratio of superiority in favour of a Railway can only exist on an exact level. Let there be a very moderate ascent — such as on an ordinary road would scarcely attract observation — one foot in fifty for instance, and the effect of a horse on a Railway is at once reduced to about one-fifth of its effect on a horizontal plane; and on arriving at such an inclination, with a load calculated for a level, the horse would be unable to move a single yard with the utmost exertion of its strength ; while on a common road, undulations such as I have stated are of ordinary occurrence — a horse being able to exert a sufficiently increased power as he ascends the eminence, and relieving himself as he descends on the opposite side. But let it not be imagined that the absolute resistance occasioned by a certain inclination, is more on a Railway than on a turnpike road : it is precisely the same, and this peculiarity in the comparative result may be easily 60 explained. The resistance on a Railway to the progress of the carriage wheels (sometimes called the rolliiig friction) being only about one-seventh what it is on common roads, the ordinary load on a level Railivay is seven times as great as the load on a turnpike road. Consequently, when the force of gravity is brought into operation by an ascending plane, this opposing force (of gravity) being proportioned to the load, will be seven times as great as on a turnpike road. Most of the Railways hitherto constructed have had an inclination downwards, being for the conveyance of coal from the pits to the river side. For purposes of general traffic, however, and where there is any thing like an equality of tonnage passing in both directions, it cannot be too constantly kept in view, that to render the moving power uniformly eflfective, and to maintain for the Railway its fall comparative advantage over the common roads, it must, as far as practicable, be level. In the Liverpool and Manchester line, this object has been in a great measure attained, as will appear from the annexed section. From tlie top of the Liverpool Tunnel to Manchester, with the exception of two inclined planes at Rainhill (one ascending and the other descending at an inclination of J in 90, and where some assistant power must be used), there is no greater inclination than in the ratio of about 1 in 880 ; and since the advantage on the descending side will nearly counterbalance the disadvantage in ascending so gradual a slope, the Railway may be regarded, for practical purposes, as nearly horizontal. SKCTION OK iH..; LlNi; ,„■ MAIL WAV Fi,<,.>, Li\-i:KI'(K»L TO .M A .\ ( ' II KS I K IJ ■ ^ '■ ■ A/V L,,,/ r . ,/ '/^/ /. '.'■ /'■'■/ ' ./ - y . A- / />...- /-*////// ,^^ ,/.. ,/, TrJ , . / /r, ?/.'/0. .Vi. Tfie SiiTfarc ,)/ fjtf /;,/,/.< at the /o^ o/' ///,- Tminf/ / f, fv c I /.t M /h'f ,^/>rr'/' //n /fa ■/(r,n ,,,' M„n, /„:- £35,538 at the Liverpool end ...) Expended at the Manchester Station 6,159 Side Tunnel, being the approach to the Crown-street \ 9 iR- n n Station J "' Gas Light Account, including cost of Pipes, 1 i nic n n Gasometer, &c J ^'"■*'' " " Engines, Coaches, Machines, &c 10,991 11 4 56,219 11 4 Formation of Road 20,568 15 5 Iron Rail Account 67,912 2 Interest Account (balance) 3,629 16 7 Land Account 95,305 8 8 Office Establishment 4,929 8 5 Parliamentary and Law Expenditure 28,465 6 11 Stone Blocks and Sleepers 20,520 14 5 Surveying Account .". 19,829 8 7 Travelling Expenses 1,423 1 5 Tunnel Account 34,791 4 9 Tunnel Compensation Account 9,977 5 7 Waggon Account 24,185 5 7 Sundry Payments for Timber, Iron, Petty Disbursements, &c. "^ c, 9.,^ 1- » not included in the foregoing Accounts J ->— / / £739,165 5 M SCHEDULE OF BRIDGES ON THE NAMES OF BRIDGES. Commencing at the Liverpool end. "a — ai -I o o c ^ •^^ 1= Parks' Bridge Old Lane Bridge Wright's Bridge Rathbone's Lane Bridge Sandown Bridge Mill Lane Arcnway Waveitree Nook Bridge Ainsworth's Bridge Case's Bridge, No. 1 Ditto, No. 2 Childwall Lane Bridge Pilch Lane Bridge Jamieson'a Bridge Lord Derby's Bridge Baron's Bridge Ball's Bridge Huyton Hey Bridge Seel's Bridge Lee's Bridge, No. 2 Ditto, No. 1 Whiston Bridge, No. 1 Ditto, No. 2 Makin's Occupation Bridge Cumber Lane Bridge Stone Lane Bridge Spring Lane Bridge Rainhill Bridge Bourne's Tunnel Marshall's Cross Bridge Sutton Bridge Sankey Viaduct Legh's Cattle Archway 'Sandy Main's Bridge Newton Bridge Parkside Bridge Lockingstump Lane Bridge Kenyon Tunnel Hardman's Bridge Newton's Bridge Broseley Bridge Withington's Bridge Duckinfield's Bridge Bury Lane Bridge Glazebrook Bridge Ht)dgkinson's Cattle Bridge Chat Moss (Frame) Bridge Legh's Brick Arch Worsley Brook. Great Culvert.. Trafford's Bridge Sandy Lane Bridge M'^inton Skew Bridge Canal (Duke's) Bridge 3Ionks' Hall Bridge Eccles Bridge Whitaker's Mill Dam Stothard's Occupation Bridge .. (tore Booth's Bridge Cross Lane Bridge Jones's Bridges — No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 Oldfield Lane Bridge Irwell Bridge Sundry Culverts, Foot Bridges, and Square. Square. Square. Askew. Square. Askew. Askew. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Askew. Unfshd. Square. Square. Square. Askew. Askew. Square. Square. Square. Square. Askew. Square. Askew. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Square. Askew. Square. Square. Sq. & Aslcew Under. Under. Under. Under. Under. Lender. Under. Over. Over. Over. Over. Over. Over. Over. Over. Over. Over. Over. Over. Over. Lender. Under. Under. Under. Under. Under. Over. Under. Under. Over. Over. Over. Over. Under. Under. Under. Under. Under. Under. Over. Over. Over. Ov.Brook Over. Over. Over. Ov.Brook Over. Over. Over. Over. Under. Under. 38 47 15 32 6 Square. Square' Askew. Askew. Askew. Askew. Askew. Askew. Under. Under. Under. Under. Under. Under. Lender. Ov. River 31 34 Ashler with brick ftrch^faoed with itone. Brick-work. Brick-work. Atbler with brick arrh, faced with ttou*. Ashler. Brick -work. Ashler. Ashler. Ashler. Ashler. Brick arch and ashler quoins. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Rubble, with ashler quoins. Brick arch andashlerquoins. Ditto. Ditto. Ashler with brick arch. faced withtton*. Timber on stone piers. Ashler. Wood with stone piers. Afhicr with brick arch, faced with stone. Ashler. Ashler and rubble. Ashler. Ashler. Brick with stone face, quoins & parapets. Brick-work. Brick-work. Brick-work,with stone facing Brick-work. Brick -work. Brick-work. Brick-work. Brick-work. Brick-work. Brick-work. Brick-work. Brick, with stone quoins. Bnck. with stunequoiiis&.^tonepiUaster». Brick. Brick and timber. Brick. Brick. Brick. Brick and stone quoins. Brick and stone pilasters. Dressed ashler. Brick. Brick and stone quoins. Brick-work and Masonry ... Brick. Brick. Biiek and stone quoins to arch. Brick. Brick. Brick and stone quoins. Brick and stone quoins. Ashler. compensation in lieu of Occupation Bridges LIVERPOOL AND MANXHESTER RAILWAY. C s 1! |l III '. A 1- i ?■' ' CO -3. ■a = S .2 " 1^. = 0. « 2 ii gas C J, ■a s COST. 0-2 s2 OS K 3si 25 i. j. a g _c a 3 3 a < ^•^ ^ s en 35 z z Ft. In. Ft. In. Ft. In. Ft. In. Ft. In. £. S. D. 1 Stone. Masonry. 28 30 26 9 Level. _ 741 5 9 2 Stone. Brick. 12 30 18 Level. _ Unfthd. 156 10 3 Stone. Brick. 15 30 18 Level. 184 5 6 4 Stone. Masonry. 23 6 30 24 3 Level. __ Unfshd. 973 14 2 fi Stone. Masonry. 15 8 40 40 6 Level. __ 765 13 1 6 None. Rock. 60 25 35 Level. ^_ 91 3 11 7 Stone. Rock. 20 37 6 18 Iin20 __ 5 __ 274 9 4 8 Stone. Masonry. 34 6 12 13 6 Level. 418 5 10 9 Stone. Masonry. 34 6 12 16 _^ Level. 418 2 10 Stone. Masonry. 34 6 12 16 , Level. 493 3 11 Stone. fllasonry. 66 6 14 16 _ Level. _ 346 12 1 12 Stone. Masonry. 34 6 16 16 ^_ lin 30 5 6 270 1 13 Stone. Masonry. 34 6 12 18 ^^^ Level. __ 202 7 14 Stone. Masonry. 34 6 12 20 ,., Level. ^ 241 16 1 15 Stone. 3Iasonry. 34 6 12 16 _ Level. _, 240 9 11 16 Stone. Masonry. 34 6 12 19 _ Level. __ _ 204 6 6 17 Stone, Masonry. 34 6 12 12 4 — Level. _ 302 3 2 18 Stone. 3Iasonry. 34 6 12 14 .^ lin 30 _ 1 6 215 3 19 Stone. Masonry. 34 6 12 14 10 — Level. 215 8 10 20 Stone. Masonry. 34 6 12 21 10 ,.. , Level. __ _ 282 9 21 Stone. Masonry. 47 6 22 18 linl3 _ 14 960 5 22 Stone. Masonry. 24 30 18 lin20 _^ 15 — 1174 1 23 __ _ _ 30 , _ — 74 15 2 24 Stone. Masonry. 16 30 18 lin20 __ 12 .• 636 13 26 Stone. Masonry. 9 45 18 Level. - - 193 15 3 26 Stone. Masonry. 16 30 18 1 in 30 e~ ,__ 418 19 8 27 Stone. Masonry. 30 30 18 lin26 12 ... 3735 6 7 28 Stone. 3Iasonry. 104 7 7 __ _ __ ,_ 165 5 a 29 Stone. Masonry. 24 30 18 lin20 _ 5 , 864 13 10 30 Stone. Masonry. 26 6 30 23 Level. ^ _ , , 470 8 9 31 Stone. Brick-work. 25 50 eO'oCanal __ 45,208 18 6 33 None. Brick. None. 12 6 _^ „, , 257 18 5 33 Stone. Brick. 35 12 15 . , „ 429 I 34 Stone. Brick. 25 30 27 _^ - ,, 6340 12 5 35 Stone. Rock. 20 30 18 6 1 in 18. _^ 8 ^ , 316 19 6 36 Stone. Brick. 20 30 18 Level. ■ ,, , 491 14 9 37 Stone. Brick. _ 30 19 Level. ,^^ , ,, , , 1703 19 1 38 Stone. Brick. 12 '0 30 20 lin 9 ,^_ , 3 6 434 7 9 39 Stone. Brick. 12 30 18 1 in 12 ^^ 7 369 12 2 40 Stone. Brick. 20 30 18 1 in 18 __ 7 __ 663 4 10 41 Stone. Brick. 35 12 14 Level. __^ 419 15 4 42 Stone. Brick. 35 12 14 __ Level. ^^ 323 10 3 43 Stone. Brick. 35 16 16 I in 20 3 621 1 7 44 Stone. Brick. 35 30 30ab.Biv. _^ , , 1758 8 6 45 Stone. Brick. 35 9 10 .^ _ _ UnfThd. 13 9 46 Stone. Brick. 25 12 13 _^ _ __ 466 19 6 47 Stone. Brick. 25 16 16 __ Level. . 613 9 6 48 Stone. Brick. 125 13 13 to Wat. 1598 6 8 49 Stone. Brick. 69 12 13 _^ Level. ■ ._^ 689 6 50 Stone. Brick. 25 16 21 Level. 1098 18 4 51 Stone. Masonry. 25 22 20 _^ Level. ^_ 1725 10 5 52 Stone. Masonry. 25 25 12 to Wat. , Level. 1158 8 11 S3 Stone. Red Rock. 36 30 18 lin 13 6~ 453 19 11 54 Stone. Red Rock. 48 30 18 lin 24 6 954 1 55 631 10 2 5fi Stone. "Brick."" "12" 0" "30" 0" 16" "6" iin 14" "5 "o" Unfshd." 31 19 57 Stone. Brick. 18 8 30 18 lin 18 5 417 13 7 58 Stone. Brick. 48 30 18 1 in 30 6 801 12 3 59 Stone. Brick. 42 30 18 lui20 6 60 Stone. Brick. 42 30 18 6 ( ) 559 14 5 61 Stone. Brick. 48 30 18 lin 20 6 J Onfi- f S Dished r 62 Stone. Brick. 48 30 18 lin 13 7 988 15 11 63 Stone. Masonry. 53 63 30 to Ri' (. J 8795 4 4 4296 16 £ 1 99,065 11 9 100 OBSERVATIONS. Bhickmaking Accounts. — The greater part of these Bricks are fast using in the building of the Manchester Warehouses, Offices, &c. and some in completing the Bridges at each end of the line. Bridges. — The foregoing description of the several Bridges in a tabularform, I have thoughtwould not be uninteresting, as affording a popular view of the kind of structures that may be expected to occur in similar undertakings. It will be seen that several of the Bridges are still unfinished, though fast approaching their completion — for this purpose a fund is reserved, as per the estimate below. Chat Moss. — Under this head is comprised the earth-work from Bury-lane Bridge to Legh's Occupation Bridge, on the east border of the Moss, a distance of 4 ':.'.vft»..'il*;»-_.r''.<'i?:;