DUKE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY DURHAM, N. C. Form 934—20M-—7-35 OF NEW-ENGLAND, ON THEIR OPPOSITION TO THE RULERS OF THE UNITED STATES. | BY A LAYMAN. _ Ye are departed out of the way—ye have caused many to stumble—therefore have I made you contemptible and base before all the people.” Matacut. ———eD 31> GD => ee - CONCORD, N. H- PRINTED BY I. AND W. R. HILL. i 1814. f Lee Az eae Fy ee * eR, ce . a ey eds ees sf a dt ae de ea ede & 5 rh, ‘ i) the 4 by es b 5 oy ‘PREFACE. — : eR ag tae Pb y / % +f * a % onllip)' Agee? pence ie uy a ees a wear - a +h THE subject of the following Address, printed ori Hamesuiae Pararor, having excited considerable attention, induced to give it a more permanent ferm than that in which - appeared. His object in this address was not to effect any : party politics ; but to attract the attention of the Clergy to a sense of th real interest, and to a course of conduct-comporting with the reli; profess, and to the duty they owe-society. He has done this, by ex the impropriety of their mingling with the factions ef the times, impolicy and wickedness of reviling rulers. He has septied a ss and positive injunctions of the Scrijtures on them, to “support, not F the civil magisurates, whom God in his providence has placed in aut . over them, The exposition of the duties of a christian pastor, dedu zvom the explicit deciarations of Christ and his Apostles, wus oan ee and certrasted with the proofs, neither few in number or trivial in eh -" ier, of a-course of conduct deliberately afd systematically puted hae - ny of the Clergy of New-England, directly the reverse ef that en che New Testament. ar Bp ‘Vhe conclusion resulting not merely from the reasoning of but from the incontrovertible facts he adduced, was humilia ; of men, who, not content with directing our ‘spiritual concern the ghastly confessors of ether ages and countries, grasping ¥ ble avidity at the control of our temporal affairs—-at the go the present ag wellas future world. ‘This view of thei exhibited by the Layman to expose them as a spectacle of derision, but to induce them to return to their duty—that moral aud religious instruction—a duty for whieh their o ally instituted, and the performance of which can alone r nently. useful and respectable. That no adequate motive might be: to such a course of conduct, the Layman after peinting out their d clergymen -procecded te Jay before them a view of their ii proved that they had not only violated the sacred i ju but were sacrificing their own ease and satety by attach political party. ' Lhe We have too much reason to believe it is the design of s to procure fur themselves a religious establishment, im people. An alliance between Church and State would fruitful of mischief to both. The Layman has’ warr tomer such a project; it can only be effected by 1 { jigious freedom, and that ina country where above all o highly prized. A country, in which the number andd s° aries are not only numerous, but where all of them e munities to a much greater degree than any natio’ ave the doctrines and opinions in the following a y sir behalf an elaborate answer has been gether foreign from the subject. Theonly are = PREFACE. if th adduced by that writer, and which, from its frequent use and apparent suc- cess With the uninformed, seemed deserving of any reply, has been noticed “by the Layman in his last number. There is another topic usual on such occasions, and’ which has been te- sorted to on the present. Whenever the clergy are admonished ef their faults, a hue and ery is raised through the land, ihst “ Religion is in dan- ger—the ordinances of God are despised—and the holy things of the church are profaned.” From the clamor thus raised against the Layman, one who had not read his address would conclude he had declared hostilitw against Christianity itself. But he has only attempted, and that in the spir- itof friendship, to reclaim the clergy from intermeddling with degrading contentions, about which they aretoo ignerant to decide, and with which they have no concern. He thinks they ought to be confined to the strict discharge of their clerical duties. When thus employed, he would least of all men withhold from them their just share of respect and esteem. But the moment they resign the sacred character —the moment they attempt to fight the battles of party with the weapons of religion, he will regard them is every honest man must regard them, with uo portion of that respect or affection which the pastoral character sonaturalcy inspires. A clengyman Preaching party politics, merits Jess attention than the meanest of his heayers. Before hecan submit to become the toal of party, he must Imave » lost much of the temper and of the feelings of a minister of the meck Re- deemer.. If hewill wallow in the mire of fuctiovs apposition, he cannot expect his cassock and band will protect him from the filth and slander which he delights in handling. The Rowan CathdMeipyiests of the middie ages often led their flocks to battle, and frequently, were! most forward in deeds of blood and slaughter. The history of those martial prelaics is worthy of the attention of our modern pulpit warriors. The, Bishep of Beayais was taken prisoner in battle by Richard 1, king of England, (tim- self an enemy to priests) and thrown into prison, loaded with irons. When the Pope demanded his liberty, claiming him asa.sen of the church, the king sent to His Holiness the ceat of mail which the bishop had worn inbattle, and which was all besmeared with’ blood, with the words:of the sens of Ja- cob to that patriarch, “This have we found ; knew now whether it be thy - son’scoatorno?” It-Joes notappear that the Pope afterwards renewed his demand for that worthy son of the Church. Have our Clergymep, in he situation they have placed themselves, any right to expect na kg treatment? If they are pierced through with many weunds, can they blame any one but themselves ? : ee." y I cannot omiton this occasion adding a quotation fiom Mr, Burne. If the subject required great names.in its support, it would be difficult to se- lect one from modern times more eminent. ‘ Politics)” says he, “and the pulpit are terms that have little agreement. No scund ought to be iieard in the.church but the healing voice of christiancharity. The cause of civil liberty and: civil government gains little as that of religion by this confu- sion of duties. Those who quit their proper character to assume what does not belong to them, are, for the greater part, ignorant both of the charac- ter they leave, and of the character they assume. Wholly unacquainted with the World in which they are so fond of meddling, and inexperienced :n all its affairs,on which they pronounce with so much confidence, they have nothing of politics but the passions they excite. Surely, the church is a place where one day’s truee ought to be allowed to the disseations and animosities of mankind”. But if the clergy should still pursue a course so contrary both to their ‘duty and. interest, there remains. only one other remedy to be applied. If P63596 iv PREFACE. reason and remonstrance prove unavailing, an cP es motives. The clergy will be ' to feel ee of their preposterous conduct. If Pl 2 will eer sel nig bhi ee as ‘this procedure alread mr people Le their rights en this es aig i 2 aml a te na : eee hi ke of ey. cessions and promises psn of New-England beware how they tax the the people There is a point of suflerance beyon not, and ought nottoendure, _ " é April 18, 1814, ud eae eette eth a 4 Sees, on ’ é ncoemnly Ae ee iaradit ee cing ‘ ik LLL ide i 5 4 ie { + x ae ‘ u\ , r “ a” ry \\ “f ee oe 7 2 ‘ wal a oe Be if ' Cw. rez Y Ae. ORG. Sarria er dy Luda Key res Pia eeT 6 “Whe. ae vi e He ‘af CS ie ¢ d 43 eh aS Sty > Riis ry PY Se Po Fis c ‘ ‘ + Gakn ty yi i . *, 7 «& % v7 é By 4 - i » 8h a e ¢ /, ASA & / \ : feo x {. { | \ : rh fe if ALGF | Ti fl e He sa at ie j 4 Sport eka . o— : TO THE. : CLERGY OF NEW-ENGLAND. ; . NO. 4. REVEREND GENTLEMEN, DO not consider a Newspaper as the most proper me- & dium for diseussing either the principles or the cere-. monials of religion : I shall therefore in this address avoid, as far as I ean with propriety, the investigation of either the one or the ether. My designis to examine your con- duct in relation to the civil government and the secial and natural rights ef our eountry—to compare your reeent practice with that of the clergy of 1775 and 17763 withr that of your ewn in 4797, ’8 and ’9 ; and with the positive injunctions of the religion of which you are tlie professed teachers. As your rank and influence on society on the one hand, demanda course marked with cander and frank- ness, a respect to our injured country and to myself, equal- ly require on the other, that, like a faithful witness; I should tell the whole truth. And as a particular faver, I request that you would with candor and deliberation con- sider what I write, and not become-my enemy because I tell you the trwilt. ‘It is a fact that cannot be eontroverted, that a great ma- jority of you for the last twelve years. have entered the ranks of oppositien-against those whom tho nation elected both to legislate and to administer their General Govern- ment. And since that Government, which is the only tri- -bunal to whom the people have intrusted the power of peace and of war, has by the injustice ef Britain been compelled to declare war in vindication of our essential rights, many of you have often repeatedly and publicly declared the war whjust and unnecessary, and that those who engage in it are murderers. You have used every mean in your power te prevent enlistments into the army and subscriptions to loan money to supportit--and many of you, without eyi- “ -P63596 Mf _ iddress to the Clergy. , ; | dence, have with unblushing effrontery deela the Administration of our country was governed