5 en Qa * oe oe ——~ ee as cy a a wa SN ee — Siena et ee ee Se Ee arte gene, Fe ee ne mt — — ee shea pone oe ae a NS — ee nn a Oy ON BEM Lali age we - ees a a — Sg tr A ag ae re ara = er nae a eT ry oe rere S . : : ae fey Cuarp. XXX.—On 2 wise we May come to be beyond and above all Custom, Order, Law, Precepts and the like oe TOR Cuap. XXXI.—How we are not to cast off the Life of Christ, but practise it dili- gently, and walk in it until Death . 108 Cuap. XXXII.—How God is a true, simple, perfect Good, and how He is a Light and a Reason and all Virtues, and how «~~ what is highest and best, that is, God, ought to be most loved by us Piel} ¢- Ixxiv Theologia Germanica Cuap. XXXIII.—How when a Man is made truly Godlike, his Love is pure Va and unmixed, and he loveth all Creatures, and doth his best for them . Cuap. XXXIV.—How that if a Man will attain to that which is best, he must for- “swear his own Will ; and he who help- V eth a Man to his own Will helpeth him to the worst Thing he can . Cuap. XXXV.—How there is deep iad true Humility and Poornesgof Spirit in a Man who is “made a Paffaker of the Divine Nature” Cuap. XXXVI. rae nasties is eae to God but Sin only ; and what Sin is ne in Kind and Act : Cuarp. XXXVII.—How in ae as Gad there can neither be Grief, Sorrow, Dis- on pleasure, nor the like, but how it is ’ > otherwise in a Man who is “made a SS vad Partaker of the Divine Nature” Y Cuarp. XXXVIII.—How we are to put on Wi the Life of Christ from Love, and not for the sake of Reward, and how we must never grow careless concerning it, or cast it off , ‘ : : CuHap, XXXIX.—How God will have Order, Custom, Measure, and the like I2I 127 130 135 —— _ a Contents in the Creature, seeing that He cannot have them without the Creature, and of four sorts of Men who are concerned with this Order, Law, and Custom Cuap. XL.—A good Account of the False Light and its Kind . Cuar. XLI.—How that he is to be alla and is truly, a Partaker of the Divine Nature, who is illuminated with the Divine Light, and inflamed with Eternal Love, and hew Light and Knowledge are worth nothity without Love ; Cuap. XLII—A Question: whether we can know God and not love Him ; and how there are two kinds of Light and Love,—a true and a false Cuap. XLIII.—Whereby we may know a Man who is made a Partaker of the Divine Nature, and what belongeth unto him; and further, what is the token of a False Light and a False Free- Thinker x : Cuap. XLIV.—How Beds is contrary to God but Self-will, and how he who seeketh his own Good for his own sake, findeth it not ; and how a Man of him- self neither knoweth nor can do any good Thing Ixxv PAGE 160 Ixxvi Theologia Germanica PAGE Cuap. XLV.—How that where there is a Christian Life, Christ dwelleth, and how Christ’s Life is the best and most admir- able Life that ever hath been or can be 181 Cuap. XLVI.—How entire Satisfaction and true Rest are to be found in God alone, and not in any Creature; and how he who will be obedient unto God, Vg must also be obedient to the Creatures with all Quietness, and he who would love God, must love all Things in One 184 Cuap. XLVII.—A Question : Whether, if we ought to love all a we ought to love Sin also? ; 187 Cuar. XLVIII.—How we must belted certain Things of God’s Truth before- hand, ere we can come toa true Know- ledge and Experience thereof. 190 Cuap. XLIX.—Of Self-will, and — Lucifer and Adam fell away from God through Self-will : : : ee LOM Crap. L.—How this present Time is a Paradise and Outer Court of Heaven, a and how therein there is only one Tree forbidden, that is, Self-will . ; 2 gz Cuap. LI.—Wherefore God hath created Self-will, seeing that it is so contrary to Him. : é : : : a HOH Contents * Ixxvii Cuap. LII.—How we must take those two Sayings of Christ: “No Man cometh unto the Father, but by me,” and “ No Man cometh unto Me, except the Father which hath sent Me draw him” : Cuap. LIII.—Considereth that other Say- ing of Christ, “No Man can come unto Me, except the Father, which hath sent Me, draw him” Cuap. LIV. i a Man shall not ot his own, either in Things spiritual or natural, but the Honour of God only ; and how he must enter in by the right Door, to wit, by Christ, into Eternal life “CVO” PAGE 208 212 222 A \Preface This little Wook hath the Almighty and Eternal Gov spoken bp the mouth of a wige, understanding, faithful, righteous man, Wis friend, tho aforetime twas of the ~ GWeutonic orver, a Priest and a CHarden in the house of the Weutonic order in jfrankfort: and it giveth much precious ingight into Dibine truth, and espe- cially teacheth bot and tohereby wwe map Discern the true and upright friends of God from those unrighteous and false free- thinkers, toho are most Hurt- ful to the Woly Church. = Theologia Germanica Theologia Germanica CHAPTER |! Of that which is perfect and that which is in part, and how that which is in part is done away, when that which is perfect is come. SS gj). PAUL saith, “ When. that iS which 1s perfect is come, then DEA that which is in part shall be done away.”! Now mark what is “that which is perfect,” and “that which is in » . part “That which is perfect” is a Being, who hath comprehended and included all 1 1 Cor. xiii. 10. § B 2 Theologia Germanica things in Himself and His own Substance, and without whom, and beside whom, there is no true Substance, and in whom all things have their Substance. For He is the Substance of all things, and is in Himself unchangeable and immoveable, and changeth and moveth all things else. But “that which is in part,” or the Im- perfect, is that which hath its source in, or springeth from the Perfect; just as a brightness or a visible appearance floweth out from the sun or a candle, and ap- peareth to be somewhat, this or that. And it is called a creature; and of all - these ‘“‘ things which are in part,” none is the Perfect. So also the Perfect is none of the things which are in part. The things which are in part can be - apprehended, known, and expressed; but the Perfect cannot be apprehended, known, or expressed by any creature as Theologia Germanica 3 creature. Therefore we do not give a name to the Perfect, for it is none of these. The creature as creature cannot know nor apprehend .it, name nor con- ceive it. “ Now when that which is Perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.” But when doth it come? I say, when as much as may be, it is known, felt and tasted of the soul. [For the lack lieth altogether in us, and not in it. In like manner the ~ sun lighteth the whole world, and is as near to one as another, yet a blind man seeth it not ; but the fault thereof lieth in the blind man, not in the sun. And like as the sun may not hide its bright- ness, but must give light unto the earth (for heaven indeed draweth its light and heat from another fountain), so also God, who is the highest Good, willeth not to 4 Theologia Germanica hide Himself from any, wheresoever He findeth a devout soul, that is thoroughly purified from all creatures. For in what measure we put off the creature, in the same measure are we able to put on the Creator; neither more nor less. For if mine eye is to see anything, it must be single, or else be purified from all other things; and where heat and light enter in, cold and darkness must needs depart ; it cannot be otherwise. | But one might say, ‘ Now since the Perfect cannot be known nor apprehended of any creature, but the soul is a creature, how can it be known by the soul?” Answer: This is why we say, “by the soul as a creature.” We mean it is impossible to the creature in virtue of its creature-nature and qualities, that by which it saith “I” and “ myself.” For — Theologia Germanica 5 in whatsoever creature the Perfect shall be known, therein creature - nature, qualities, the I, the Self and the like, must all be lost and done away. This is the meaning of that saying of St. Paul : “ When that which is perfect is come” (that is, when it is known), “then that which is in part” (to wit, creature-nature, qualities, the I, the Self, the Mine) will be despised and counted for nought. So long as we think much of these things, cleave to them with love, joy, pleasure or desire, so long remaineth the Perfect unknown to us. But it might further be said, ‘“ Thou sayest, beside the Perfect there is no Substance, yet sayest again that some- what floweth out from it: now is not that which hath flowed out from it, something beside it?” Answer: This is why we say, beside it, or without it, 6 Theologia Germanica there is no ¢rue Substance. That which hath flowed forth from it, is no true Substance, and hath no Substance except in the Perfect, but is an accident, or a brightness, or a visible appearance, which is no Substance, and hath no Substance except in the fire whence the bright- ness flowed forth, such as the sun ora candle. CHAPTERS Of what Sin is, and how we must not take unto ourselves any good Thing, seeing that it belongeth unto the true Good alone. Ar HE Scripture and the Faith and the Truth say, Sin is nought else, but that the creature turneth away from the unchangeable Good and betaketh itself to the changeable; that is to say, that it turneth away from the Theologia Germanica 7 Perfect to “that which is in part” and imperfect, and most often to itself. Now mark: when the creature claimeth for its own anything good, such as Substance, Life, Knowledge, Power, and in short whatever we should call good, as if it were that, or possessed that, or that were itself, or that proceeded from it,—as often as this cometh to pass, the creature goeth astray. What did the devil do else, or what was his going astray and his fall else, but that he claimed for himself to be also somewhat, and would ° have it that somewhat was his, and some- what was due to him? This setting up of a claim and his I and Me and Mine, these were his going astray, and his fall. And thus it is to this day. 8 Theologia Germanica CHAPTER Ait How Man’s Fall and going astray must be amended as Adam's Fall was. (Fay/ HAT else did Adam do but Ni ‘lege i ae e v\ ~| this same thing? It is said, f\ 225. it was because Adam ate the apple that he was lost, or fell. I say, it was because of his claiming something for his own, and because of his I, Mine, Me, and the like. Had he eaten seven apples, and yet never claimed anything for his own, he would not have fallen: but as soon as he called something his own, he fell, and would have fallen if he had never touched an apple. Behold! I have fallen a hundred times more often and deeply, and gone a hundred times farther astray than Adam; and not all ’ Theologia Germanica 9 mankind could amend his fall, or bring him back from going astray. But how shall my fall be amended? It must be healed as Adam’s fall was healed, and on the self-same wise. By whom, and on what wise was that healing brought to pass? Mark this: man could not without God, and God should not with- out man. Wherefore God took human nature or manhood upon Himself and was made man, and man was made divine. Thus the healing was brought to pass. So also must my fall be healed. I cannot do the work without God, and God may not or will not without me ; for if it shall be accomplished, in me, too, God must be made man; in such sort that God must take to Himself all that is in me, within and without, so that there may be nothing in me which striveth against God or hindereth His 10 Theologia Germanica work. Now if God took to Himself all men that are in the world, or ever were, and were made man in them, and they were made divine in Him, and this work were not fulfilled in me, my fall and my wandering would never be amended except it were fulfilled in me also. And in this bringing back and healing, I can, or may, or shall do nothing of myself, but just simply yield to God, so that He alone may do all things in me and work, and I may suffer Him and all His work and His divine will. And because I will not do so, but I count myself to be my own, and say “I,” ‘“ Mine,” “Me” and the like, God is hindered, so that He cannot do His work in me alone and without hindrance; for this cause my fall and my going astray remain unhealed. Behold! this all cometh of my claiming somewhat for my own. Theologia Germanica Il CHAPTER IV How Man, when he claimeth any good Thing for his own, falleth, and toucheth God in His Honour. OD saith, “I will not give My & glory to another.”* This is as much as to say, that praise and honour and glory belong to none but to God only. But now, if I call any good thing my own, as if I were it, or of myself had power or did or knew anything, or as if anything were mine or of me, or belonged to me, or were due to me or the like, I take unto myself somewhat of honour and glory, and do two evil things: First, I fall and go astray as aforesaid: Secondly, I touch God in His honour and take unto my- 1 Tsaiah xlii. 8. 12 Theologia Germanica self what belongeth to God only. For all that must be called good belongeth to none but to the true eternal Goodness which is God only, and whoso taketh it unto himself, committeth unrighteous- ness and is against God. CHAPTERa How we are to take that Saying, that we must come to be without Will, Wisdom, Love, Desire, Knowledge, and the like. ERTAIN men say that we ought to be without will, wisdom, love, desire, know- ledge, and the like. Hereby is not to be understood that there is to be no knowledge in man, and that God is not to be loved by him, nor desired and Theologia Germanica ha longed for, nor praised and honoured ; for that were a great loss, and man were like the beasts [and as the brutes that have no reason]. But it meaneth that man’s knowledge should be so clear and perfect that he should acknowledge of a truth [that in himself he neither hath nor can do any good thing, and that none of his knowledge, wisdom and art, his will, love and good works do come from himself, nor are of man, nor of any creature, but] that all these are of the eternal God, from whom they all proceed. [As Christ Himself saith, “‘ Without Me, ye can do nothing.”? St. Paul saith also, ‘‘ What hast thou that thou hast not received? ”? As much as to say— nothing. ‘‘Now if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory as if thou hadst not received it?” Again he saith, “‘ Not 1 John xy. 5. 2 1 Cor. iv. 7. 14 Theologia Germanica that we are sufficient of ourselves to think anything as of ourselves, but our sufficiency is of God.”"] Now when a man duly perceiveth these things in him- self, he and the creature fall behind, and he doth not call anything his own, and the less he taketh this knowledge unto himself, the more perfect doth it become. So also is it with the will, and love and desire, and the like. For the less we — call these things our own, the more perfect and noble and Godlike do they become, and the more we think them our own, the baser and less pure and perfect do they become. Behold on this sort must we cast all things from us, and strip ourselves of them; we must refrain from claiming — anything for our own. When we do this, we shall have the best, fullest, 1 2 Cor. iii. 5. Theologia Germanica 15 clearest and noblest knowledge that a man can have, and also the noblest and purest love, will and desire; for then these will be all of God alone. It is much better that they should be God’s than the creature’s. Now that I ascribe anything good to myself, as if I were, or had done, or knew, or could perform any good thing, or that it were mine, this is all of sin and folly. For if the truth were rightly known by me, I should also know that I am not that good thing and that it is not mine, nor of me, and that I do not know it, and cannot do it, and the like. If this came to pass, I should needs cease to call any- thing my own. It is better that God, or His works, - should be known, as far as it be possible to us, and loved, praised and honoured, and the like, and even that man should 16 Theologia Germanica vainly imagine he loveth or praiseth God, than that God should be altogether unpraised, unloved, unhonoured and un- known. For when the vain imagination and ignorance are turned into an under- standing and knowledge of the truth, the claiming anything for our own will cease of itself. Then the man says: “Behold! I, poor fool that I was, imagined it was I, but behold! it is and was, of a truth, God!” wet oe Theologia Germanica 17 SHAPTER VI How that which is best and noblest should also be loved above all Things by us, merely because it is the best. MASTER called Boetius saith, “Tt is of sin that we do not love that which is Best.” He hath spoken the truth. That which is best should be the dearest of all things to us; and in our love of it, neither helpfulness nor unhelpfulness, advantage nor injury, gain nor loss, honour nor dishonour, praise nor blame, nor any- thing of the kind should be regarded; but what is in truth the noblest and best of all things, should be also the dearest of all things, and that for no other cause than that it is the noblest and best. c 18 Theologia Germanica Hereby may a man order his life - within and without. His outward life : for among the creatures one is better than another, according as the Eternal Good manifesteth itself and worketh more in one than in another. Now that creature in which the Eternal Good most manifesteth itself, shineth forth, worketh, is most known and loved, is the best, and that wherein the Eternal Good is least manifested is the least good of all creatures. Therefore when we have to do with the creatures and hold converse with them, and take note of their diverse qualities, the best creatures must always — be the dearest to us, and we must cleave to them, and unite ourselves to them, above all to those which we attribute to God as belonging to Him or divine, such as wisdom, truth, kindness, peace, love, justice, and the like. Hereby shall we Theologia Germanica 19 order our outward man, and all that is contrary to these virtues we must eschew and flee from. But if our inward man were to make a leap and spring into the Perfect, we should find and taste how that the Perfect is without measure, number or end, better and nobler than all which is imperfect and in part, and the Eternal above the temporal or perishable, and the fountain and source above all that floweth or can ever flow from it. Thus that which is imperfect and in part would become tasteless and be as nothing to us. Be assured of this: All that we have said must come to pass if we are to love that which is noblest, highest and best. 20 Theologia Germanica CHAPTER VII Of the Eyes of the Spirit wherewith Man /ooketh into Eternity and into Time, and how the one is hindered of the other in its Working. sJET us remember how it is written and said that the soul : of Christ had two eyes, a right and a left eye. In the beginning, when the soul of Christ was created, she fixed her right eye upon eternity and the God- head, and remained in the full intuition and enjoyment of the Divine Essence and Eternal Perfection; and continued thus unmoved and undisturbed by all the accidents and travail, suffering, tor- ment and pain that ever befell the out- ward man. But with the left eye she beheld the creature and perceived all Theologia Germanica 21 things therein, and took note of the difference between the creatures, which were better or worse, nobler or meaner ; and thereafter was the outward man of Christ ordered. Thus the inner man of Christ, accord- ing to the right eye of His soul, stood in the full exercise of His divine nature, in perfect blessedness, joy and eternal peace. But the outward man and the left eye of Christ’s soul, stood with Him in perfect suffering, in all tribulation, affliction and travail ; and this in such sort that the inward and right eye remained unmoved, unhindered and untouched by all the travail, suffering, grief and anguish that ever befell the outward man. It hath been said that when Christ. was bound to the pillar and scourged, and when He hung upon the cross, according to the outward man, yet His inner man, or soul 22 Theologia Germanica according to the right eye, stood in as full possession of divine joy and blessed- ness as it did after His ascension, or as it doth now. In like manner His outward man, or soul with the left eye, was never hindered, disturbed or troubled by the inward eye in its contemplation of the outward things that belonged to it. Now the created soul of man hath also two eyes. The one is the power of - seeing into eternity, the other of seeing into time and the creatures, of perceiving how they differ from each other as afore- said, of giving life and needful things to the body, and ordering and governing it for the best. But these two eyes of the soul of man cannot both perform their work at once; but if the soul shall see with the right eye into eternity, then the left eye must close itself and refrain from working, and be as though it were dead. Theologia Germanica 23 For if the left eye be fulfilling its office toward outward things; that is, holding converse with time and the creatures; then must the right eye be hindered in its working ; that is, in its contempla- tion. Therefore whosoever will have the one must let the other go; for “no man can serve two masters.” CHAPTER VIII How the Soul of Man, while it is yet in the Body, may obtain a Foretaste of eternal Blessedness.