-••<•» c/\. |CZ3|CT3|[=3|IZZHl IKHWKHS for &0tf%&**-& -:---- -'^ *#&jf£^ Head Master ©^ Clerk to the Boards -J r-J r-> r-J ?3 r-l rJ rJ iO r^l n. LITERARY CELEBRITIES BIOGRAPHIES OF WORDS WORTH — CAMPBELL MOORE — JEFFREY QRASMERE W. & R. CHAMBERS LONDON AND EDINBURGH 1887 The four biographical and critical papers of which this volume is composed appeared originally in Chambers's Papers for the People. CONTENTS. PAGE WILLIAM WORDSWORTH 7 THOMAS CAMPBELL 74 THOMAS MOORE 149 FRANCIS JEFFREY 217 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. william Wordsworth Frontispiece RYDAL MOUNT 7 WINDERMERE PROM ABOVE AMBLESIDE 12 ROBERT SOUTHEY 25 SAMUEL TAYLOR COLERIDGE 33 THOMAS CAMPBELL 74 YE MARINERS OF ENGLAND 98 LORD ULLIN'S DAUGHTER 110 THOMAS MOORE 148 LORD BYRON 163 THE VALE OP AVOCA 174 FRANCIS JEFFREY 216 CRAIGCROOK CASTLE 258 Etdal Mount. LITERARY CELEBRITIES. WILLIAM WORDSWORTH. HIS poet, whose works now occupy so large a space in English literature, was born at Cockermouth in Cumberland, April 7, 1770. His father was law-agent to the Earl of Lonsdale, and that noble family in after-years always kept a kindly watch over the welfare of the son. One of his brothers, Christopher, was afterwards well known as Dr Wordsworth, the master of Trinity College, Cambridge. The poet dedicated the Sonnets to the 8 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. Duddon to him, and at his death committed to his son the preparation of his biography. Another brother was commander of the Abergavenny East Indiaman, and perished in that ill-fated vessel. He seems to have been a man of susceptible tempera- ment, and of a gentle and affectionate disposition, and his untimely fate was among the heaviest blows William ever experienced. His sister Dorothy was the constant companion of the poet, and has left one or two of her poetical effusions mingled among his. She was a woman of exquisite sensibility, and of pure and well-stored mind, and was a great favourite not only with her brother, who has com- memorated her in numerous beautiful pieces, but of all with whom she came in contact. Coleridge, one of the finest judges of female character, was charmed with her, and has left in one of his letters a delightful sketch of her manners and appearance. She kept a journal of a tour made in Scotland, in 1803, with her brother, which was published in 1874, and which threw a new and illustrative light on Wordsworth's Scottish poems, and supplied a faithful commentary on the character of the poet, and his mode of life. Wordsworth seems to have considered the domestic hearth too sacred for defined por- traiture, and he has left no picture of his father, and, except in the Prelude, only a single one of his mother. It depicts her watching him with fluttering heart, as he appeared before the vicar with t his companions — ' a trembling, earnest com- pany :' How fluttered then thy anxious heart for me, Beloved mother I Thou whose happy hand WILLIAM WOKDSWOKTH. 9 Had bound the flowers I wore with faithful tie : Sweet flowers, at whose inaudible command Her countenance, phantom-like, doth reappear ; Oh lost too early for the frequent tear, And ill-requited by this heartfelt sigh. It was into the bosom of this cultivated English family that the old English spirit chose to descend in one of its noblest and purest forms. In due time the young poet was sent to Hawkshead Grammar School, which was then under the master- ship of a relative. We have few notices of his schoolboy life, but it is stated that he prosecuted with great zeal the study of the classics; and there can be no doubt, from such poems as Dion and Laodamia, that the stately and sculptural spirit of the highest classic poetry must have entered into and become a part of his very being. It is not unlikely that this would combine, with his passionate devotion to nature, to heighten his radical disinclination to join in the e very-day occupations and sympathise with the ordinary interests of the world. If there be no high moral law by which a great poet is produced in immediate contact with the scenes most fitted to develop his peculiar genius — a law in no degree more inconceivable than that by which the camel is located among the sands of Arabia — it was, at all events, a happy accident which cast Wordsworth's lot among the lakes of Cumberland and Westmoreland. That whole district may be said to stand single in the world, and to have in the peculiar character of its beauty no parallel elsewhere. It is in the concentration of every variety of loveliness into a 10 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. compass which in extent does not greatly tax the powers of the pedestrian, that it fairly defies rivalry, and affords the richest food to the poetical faculty. There every form of mountain, rock, lake, stream, wood, and plain, from the conformation of the country, is crowded with the most prodigal abundance into a few square miles. Coleridge characterises it as a ' cabinet of beauties.' ' Each thing,' says he, ' is beautiful in itself ; and the very passage from one lake, mountain, or valley to another is itself a beautiful thing again.' Words- worth, in his own Description of the Country of the Lakes, dwells with the zest and minuteness of idolatry upon every feature of that treasury of landscape. The idea he gives of the locality is very perfect and graphic. If the tourist were seated on a cloud midway between Great Gavel and Scafell, and only a few yards above their highest elevation, he would look down to the westward on no fewer than nine different valleys, diverging away from that point, like spokes from the nave of a wheel, towards the vast rim formed by the sands of the Irish Sea. These vales — Langdale, Coniston, Duddon, Eskdale, Wastdale, Ennerdale, Buttermere, Borrow- dale, and Keswick — are of every variety of char- acter ; some with, and some without lakes ; some richly fertile, and some awfully desolate. Shifting from the cloud, if the tourist were to fly a few miles eastward, to the ridge of old Helvellyn, he would find the wheel completed by the vales of Wythburn, Ullswater, Haweswater, Grasmere, Bydal, and Ambleside, which bring the eye round again i^^slBMs^^B^mSi^2ZL 2 JUak WINDERMERE, FROM ABOVE AMBLESIDE. WILLIAM WORDSWORTH. 13 to Windermere, in the vale of Langdale, from which it set out. From the sea or plain country all round the circumference of this fairy-land, along the gradually swelling uplands, to the mighty mountains that group themselves in the centre, the infinite varieties of view may be imagined — varieties made still more luxuriant by the different position of each valley towards the rising or setting sun. Thus a spectator in the vale of Windermere will in summer see its golden orb going down over the mountains, while the spectator in Keswick will at the same moment mark it diffusing its glories over the low grounds. In this delicious land, dyed in a splendour of ever-shifting colours, the old customs and manners of England still lingered in the youth of Words- worth, and took a firm hold of his heart, modifying all his habits and opinions. Though a deluge of strangers had begun to set in towards this retreat, and even the spirit of the factory threatened to invade it, still the dalesmen were impressed with that character of steadiness, repose, and rustic dignity, which has always possessed irresistible charms for the poet. Their cottages, which, from the numerous irregular additions made to them, seemed rather to have grown than to have been built, were covered over with lichens and mosses, and blended insensibly into the landscape, as if they were not human creations, but constituent parts of its own loveliness. In this old English Eden, all his schoolboy days, Wordsworth wandered restlessly, drawn hither and thither by his irresistible passion for nature, and receiving into his soul 14 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. those remarkable photographs which were after- wards to delight his countrymen. There can be no doubt that the charms of this lake scenery- added still more strength to the poet's peculiar tendencies, and developed a conservative sentiment, which, though temporarily overcome, afterwards reared itself up in haughtier majesty than before. The poet was naturally led to indulge much in out-of-door wanderings and pastimes, such as skating, of which he has left a picture unapproachable in its vividness and precision. Considering the effect of Wordsworth's subsequent theories upon his style, it is remarkable how pure, unaffected, and dignified it was at this time. Indeed, so far as style is concerned, he never, even in the vigour of manhood, excelled his juvenile productions. In 1786 he wrote some verses in anticipation of leaving school, which are chaste and sweet. Thus, in illustration of the idea that, wherever he might be, he would ever turn his look backward to his native regions, he says : Thus while the sun sinks down to rest Far in the regions of the west, Though to the vale no parting beam Be given, not one memorial gleam, A lingering light he fondly throws On the dear hills where first he rose. Among his sonnets there is one written in very early youth, which is remarkable for precocious maturity of diction : Calm is all nature as a resting wheel : The kine are couched upon the dewy grass ; WILLIAM WORDSWORTH. 15 The horse alone, seen dimly as I pass, Is cropping audibly his later rneal : Dark is the ground ; a slumber seems to steal O'er vale and mountain and the starless sky. Now in this blank of things a harmony, Home-felt and home-created, comes to heal That grief for which the senses still supply Fresh food, for only then when memory Is hushed am I at rest. My Friends ! restrain Those busy cares that would allay my pain ; Oh leave me to myself, nor let me feel The officious touch that makes me droop again ! In the year 1789 also, two small pieces were produced which in simplicity and melody he never afterwards surpassed. The one is that beginning, ' Glide gently, thus for ever glide/ which has been always much admired ; the other is brief enough for quotation. It is entitled, Lines written while Sailing in a Boat at Evening : How richly glows the water's breast Before us, tinged with evening hues, While, facing thus the crimson west, The boat her silent course pursues ! And see how dark the backward stream ! A little moment past so smiling ; And still perhaps with faithless gleam Some other loiterers beguiling. Such views the youthful bard allure ; But heedless of the following gloom, He deems their colours shall endure Till peace go with him to the tomb. And let him nurse his fond deceit ; And what if he must die in sorrow ? Who would not cherish dreams so sweet, Though grief and pain may come to-morrow ? 16 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. In 1787 Wordsworth went to Cambridge, but at every convenient opportunity he seems to have made his escape, and walked about among his beloved lakes and mountains. Even at this early date he had fixed on Grasrnere as his future place of abode. In the Evening Walk, which he was engaged in composing during this and the two following years, and which consisted of a series of very striking pictures of the Lake country, he thus alludes to this darling object of his life : Even now she decks for me a distant scene (For dark and broad the gulf of time between), Gilding that cottage with her fondest ray (Sole bourne, sole wish, sole object of my way ; How fair its lawns and sheltering woods appear ! How sweet its streamlet murmurs in mine ear ! ) Where we, my friend, to happy days shall rise, Till our small share of hardly paining sighs (For sighs will ever trouble human breath) Creep hushed into the tranquil breast of death. He varied these trips by a tour among the magnificent mountains of Wales with Mr Jones, afterwards a clergyman of the Church of England ; and in 1790 the two made a pedestrian journey through France and Switzerland to the north of Italy. The Descrip- tive Sketches arose out of this ramble. It is strikingly illustrative of the effect of the first French Revolu- tion on the European mind, that even the inflexible intellect of Wordsworth was carried away in the general whirl. Indeed he seems at this time to have been subject to a subdued melancholy, or even misanthropy, in looking on the ordinary ways of men, and particularly of politicians. The uprising WILLIAM WORDSWORTH. 17 of the French stirred his blood like 'the sound of a trumpet ; ' and in common with all the young and ardent spirits of the time, he looked for the advent of a new and more blessed era. He seems by the tone of his Sketches to have thought with Kousseau, that the ' state of nature ' is the condition most favourable to virtue and dignity; and with Shelley, that it is the rulers of the world who ' blast the human flower in its bud.' Southey and Coleridge, no less eagerly than Byron, were gazing across the Channel on the great drama enacting before the eyes of an excited world ; while Wordsworth, strange to say, more impetuous than any of them, placed his knapsack on his back, and with staff in hand, set out on his pilgrimage to the promised land. All France was in a delirium of enthusiasm : everywhere the rattle of arms and the • flapping of the tri-coloured banner. Every warlike sound was music to Wordsworth's ear as he plodded along the endless avenues of elms. To him it seemed that From every cot the watchful bird Crowed with ear-piercing power till then unheard. The following prayer shows how deeply the youth- ful poet had imbibed the revolutionary infec- tion: Grant that every sceptred child of clay Who cries, presumptuous, ' Here the flood shall stay ! ' May in its progress see thy guiding hand, And cease the acknowledged purpose to withstand ; Or swept in anger from the insulted shore, Sink with his servile bands to rise no more. B 18 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. In this wild exultation of feeling he ascended among the mists and cataracts of the Swiss mountains; and the style and language in which he has embodied his recollections are totally unlike those usual to him, and sometimes remind one of flames crackling and forcing upward through the narrow crater of a volcano. Still, however, his exquisite poetical taste enabled him to extract from his tour more pleasure than is possible to the ordinary pedestrian. He has recorded his experiences and ideas 'of such perambulations in lines which ought to be learned by rote, as the poetic manual of all travellers on foot. Thus between desultory study and perpetual wandering his college time was spent. He has him- self recorded, in his posthumous work the Prelude, the development of his mind at Cambridge, so far as it was possible to do so with accuracy, looking back from a more mature period of life. In his first session he seems to have given himself up with all the zest of a novice to the boatings, the drivings, the fetes, and the frivolities that enlivened the banks of the Cam. These unusual gaieties relaxed to some extent the tone of his imagination; and even the delight he felt on first revisiting the scenes of his boyhood scarcely reawakened the poesy within him. But the old familiar objects, and the impres- sive changes that had passed during his brief absence over many dear friends among the mountains, tended to solemnise his thoughts; and when he returned to the university, it was with a deeper love towards the spiritual world of books. His studies, however, do not appear to have been pursued WILLIAM WORDSWORTH. 19 on any rigid system. He affected, as his inclinations led him, occasionally the classics, and occasionally the abstract sciences ; and even in his riper years he felt it difficult to determine whether this care- less roving of the intellect tended more to strengthen or to debilitate. In 1793 he published his first poetical venture, The Evening Walk, and Descriptive Sketches, already referred to. These works contained no trace what- ever of any tendency to that theory which after- wards led him to adopt a style sometimes bordering on the mean. On the contrary, the style was remarkably dignified and forcible, the faults being too much luxuriance and splendour rather than meagreness and vulgarity. The matter consisted merely of descriptions of scenery, intermingled with a few pensive reflections, and some crude and juvenile theories, if they merit so dignified a title, of man and the world. The best criticism on these pieces in the smallest compass is by Samuel Taylor Coleridge. That extraordinary man laid his hands on them in 1794, while spending his last session at Cambridge, and at once discovered the indisputable marks of an original poetic genius. 'There is,' says he in his Biographia, f a harshness and acerbity connected and combined with words and images all aglow which might recall those products of the vegetable world where gorgeous blossoms rise out of a hard and thorny rind or shell, within which the rich fruit is elaborating. The language is not only peculiar and strong, but at times knotty and con- torted, as by its own impatient strength; while 20 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. the novelty and struggling crowd of images, acting in conjunction with the difficulties of the style, demand always a greater attention than poetry, at all events than descriptive poetry, has a right to claim/ A few lines will exemplify the golden splendour of the diction, and prove that their writer did not adopt the meagre phraseology of one or two of the lyrical ballads from poverty of fancy : Here half a village shines in gold arrayed, Bright as the moon ; half hides itself in shade ; While, from amid the darkened roofs, the spire, Restlessly flashing, seems to mount like fire : There, all unshaded, blazing forests throw Rich golden verdure on the lake below. Slow glides the sail along the illumined shore, And steals into the shade the lazy oar ; Soft bosoms breathe around contagious sighs, And amorous music on the waters dies. After leaving the university in 1791, when he had taken his degree of B. A., Wordsworth, who was uneasy about his future lot, planted himself down in the midst of the metropolis. He had often heard of it in his schoolboy days as of some city paved with gold, and peopled with princes. Even now he plunged amid its crowds with the eagerness and delight of a child. He rushed to every sight, and frequented every spectacle and every place of public resort. His imagination was deeply im- pressed with London ; and he found an unlimited field of thought in its endless variety of character. It is curious how little its wonders permanently affected or modified his mind, and how few con- WILLIAM WORDSWORTH. 21 tributions to his poesy appear to be drawn from this era in his activity. Perhaps this may be partly explained by the fact, that his whole soul was now riveted on the scenes that were rapidly succeeding each other on the other side of the Strait — the drama of France was fast rising into breathless interest. The Royalist legions were mustering in masses on the far bank of the Rhine, and the fate of the new-born Liberty trembled in the balance. The suspense was too great for the poet. He could not breathe in England. Its atmosphere was too stagnant for his wild hopes, and he hurried across the strip of water that severed him from the Revolution. He fixed his abode on the banks of the Loire, where he resided for two successive winters. During all this time he was lapped in a delicious day-dream. He believed that the old world was passing away, and that all things were to become new. His unsuspecting faith is affecting even in the mere faint description of it given by himself when its ardour had passed away before the stern realities of the world. He principally associ- ated with some Royalist officers, and was favoured with their confidences. But he only smiled at their menaces and their prayers for the destruction of the patriots. All Wordsworth's sympathies were with the latter ; and one military man, a patriot, of whom he has left a charming picture, was frequently the companion of his walks. The delighted pair talked in rapt language of the approaching millennium. One day they met a poor half-starved and half- naked girl ; the patriot pointed to the sad object, and 22 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. said it was their mission to banish such spectacles. Wordsworth believed it, and his heart warmed. The old and new systems were now in the death- grapple. The crisis speedily came. The Royalists were driven over the frontier. The imprisonment of the king and the September massacres followed. Wordsworth hurried up to Paris while the blood of the unhappy victims was scarcely yet dried upon the streets. He had never anticipated such libations to freedom. His mind was at this period wrought up to a kind of half-frenzy. He listened to all the street orators as well as to the orators of the Legislature. He saw what kind of men were at the head of affairs, and divined too truly what was to come. He felt in his solitary attic as if the air of Paris was too stifling for him to breathe. Yet he never once faltered in his republican faith ; and he has himself solemnly left it on record, that if he had had even ordinary qualifications as an orator, or as a political writer, he would have plunged at once into the heat of the struggle as the enemy of the faction of Robespierre, and probably have perished obscurely in that terrible convulsion. Fortunately, it was otherwise ordained ; and the poet fled from the blood-stained soil of France back to his own country. He did not, how- ever, abandon one jot of his creed. The Girondins perished ; things went into utter confusion ; horror followed horror, yet still Words- worth, afterwards so conservative, clung with undiminished fervour to the fortunes of the republic. The intervention of Great Britain filled him with abhorrence. He retired more deeply into his inner speculations, and fell into a state of utter doubt, in William Wordsworth. 23 which the best-establishecl maxims and doctrines were subjected to a merciless scrutiny. This painful condition proved very prejudicial to his higher poetical powers ; and it was long till the conversa- tion of his sister, and communion with his beloved nature, produced a renovating process of reaction in his spiritual frame. He then turned himself from his excited dreams to investigate the heart of man, and examine what true hope it might afford him of a more glorious future, and thus gradually attained that firm faith in mankind, and in the pro- gress of the people, to which he may be said, through his posthumous publications, to give melodious utter- ance from the sepulchre. This whole episode in Wordsworth's inward history is worthy of attention, both morally and psychologically. Coleridge's Gallo- mania had subsided before 1793 ; Wordsworth's lasted for some years afterwards. Indeed his mind appears, if we are to trust his Prelude, to have been in a continual mood of gloomy discontent with established institutions : I rejoiced, Yea afterwards — truth most painful to record ! — Exulted in the triumph of my soul, When Englishmen by thousands were o'erthrown, Left without glory on the field, or driven, Brave hearts, to shameful flight. It was a grief- Grief call it not, 'twas anything but that — A conflict of sensations without name, Of which he only, who may love the sight Of a village steeple as I do, can judge, When in the congregation bending all To their great Father, prayers were offered up, Or praises for our country's victories ; And 'mid the simple worshippers, perchance 24 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. I only, like an uninvited guest, Whom no one owned, sat silent — shall I add ? Fed on the day of vengeance yet to come. But his somewhat scholarly distrust and dislike of the current ways of the world were perhaps the very influences that turned his hopes to the abnormal force of the Revolution, and the spectacle of its miserable results must in time have tended to con- firm this distrust and dislike beyond the possibility of eradication. By-and-by he emerged the constant advocate of a strong government, which should rigidly administer the institutions matured in a long course of ages, and only suffer them to be altered slowly and gradually according to the dictates of experience. It may be anticipating matters a little to say how Wordsworth was delivered from that 'eternal want of pence ' which vexes public men as well as poets. In 1795 he received a legacy of £900 from Raisley Calvert, a young friend whom he had attended in his last illness. 'Upon the interest of the £900/ he says, '£400 being laid out in an annuity, with £200 deducted from the principal, and £100, a legacy to my sister, and £100 more which the Lyrical Ballads brought me, my sister and I contrived to live seven years, nearly eight.' In 1794 the step was taken by which those remarkable men, afterwards known in popular par- lance as the Lake Poets, were brought into con- tiguity. In that year Coleridge, Southey, Robert Lovell, and George Burnet came down to Bristol, as the most convenient port from which they could embark for the wild banks of the Susquehanna. On William Wordsworth. 25 that remote river they were to found a Platonic Republic, where everything was to be in common, and from which vice and selfishness were to be for ever excluded. These ardent and intellectual adven- turers had made elaborate calculations how long it .Robert Southby. would take them to procure the necessaries of life and to build their barns, and how they should spend their leisure in what Coleridge sang as Freedom's undivided dell, Where toil and health with mellowed love shall dwell; Far from folly, far from men, In the rude romantic glen. Yet, it is supposed, they knew nothing of the Susquehanna more than of any other American river, except that its name was musical and sonorous; and far from having anything wherewith to convey themselves and their movables across the Atlantic, 26 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. they had to borrow five pounds to make up their lodging bill. This sum was advanced them with unalloyed pleasure by Mr Cottle, a bookseller in the town, a benevolent and worthy man, who seems almost to have been located there for no other purpose than to introduce the three chief Lake Poets to the world. The bubble of the Susquehanna, or, as it was called, Pantisocracy, was exploded by Southey, Coleridge, and Lovell all getting into the bonds of matrimony, which have a miraculous virtue in test- ing the solidity of schemes of life. They married three sisters of the name of Fricker. It was the perpetual restlessness of Coleridge which first brought him and his companions into contact with Words- worth. The former wonderful man, in capabilities perhaps the mightiest of that illustrious group, and in his mental constitution one of the most puzzling- psychological phenomena which human nature has ever presented, was the originator of the Pantiso- cratic proposal. He was of luxurious imagination, strong emotions, various learning, and an exquisite nervous susceptibility. In the year 1795 he was making excursions through the lovely and tranquil scenery of Somersetshire, when he became acquainted with a most excellent man, Mr Poole, resident in the quiet village of Nether Stowey. On his return to Bristol, where he got married, he still exhibited his usual uneasiness. First he removed to his immortal rose-bound cottage at Clevedon, then back to the pent-up houses of RedclifF Hill, and from these again to the more open situation of Kingsdown. WILLIAM WORDSWORTH. 27 Nothing would then satisfy him but he must set up a political serial, to be called The Watchman ; and his own sketches of his travelling canvass for that periodical might take rank with some chapters of Quixote. Take, for instance, this picture of a great patriot at Birmingham, to whom he applied for his magnificent patronage : He was ' a rigid Calvinist, a tallow-chandler by trade. He was a tall, dingy man, in whom length was so predominant over breadth, that he might almost have been borrowed as a foundry poker ! Oh that face ! — a face «t' s> tion, radiant with the light and vital with the breath of poetry ! With respect to the somewhat objectionable char- acter of Moore's earlier productions, much excuse is to be found in the heartless, soulless, withered state of society — not in which he was born, that was sound and healthy, if somewhat perverse, but in which he chiefly passed his youth and prime of manhood. The debased and debasing tone of 'good' Irish society, at a time when such men as Toler and others of the same stamp could rise by dint of unblushing subserviency and hair-trigger pistols to the highest and most dignified offices in the state, and when corruption in its unveiled loathsomeness was the admitted principle of govern- ment, can only be truly estimated by those who, for their sins doubtless, have been compelled to rake in the private histories of that altogether disreputable period. This fetid atmosphere neces- sarily affected the imitative and impressionable genius of Moore, and his juvenile songs may be said to have been but a reflex — a refined one too — of the reckless, bacchanalian, sensuous tone of senti- ment and manners then so fatally prevalent. The air of the regent's court was scarcely healthier or more purifying ; and exposed to such influences — poor, and ambitious of applause, intoxicated by the smiles of exclusive fashionable circles, in which he was not indeed born, but which gradually became a necessity of his existence, and whose continued favour could only be purchased by ministering to their tastes — Moore, under such circumstances, should be forgiven much. As public sentiment acquired 210 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. a healthier tone, so did his writings ; and his last considerable effort, The Epicurean, is as distinguished for the reticence of its language and the purity of its sentiment as for the absence of the fanciful genius which threw a glittering veil over the pro- ductions of his earlier life. This excusatory sugges- tion has been forestalled by Moore himself, and is well expressed in the following verse of one of his songs : Oh blame not the Bard if he fly to the bowers Where Pleasure lies carelessly smiling at Fame : He was born for much more, and in happier hours His soul might have burned with a holier flame ! Turning from Moore the poet to Moore the politi- cian, there is not much to remark upon; neither certainly is there place for two opinions. Moore wrote politics at times — pointed, bitter, rankling politics — but he was really at heart no politician. There was no earnestness in what he did in this way, and it was early and abundantly evident from his alternate eulogies and vituperation of democratic institutions, that he had no firmly based convic- tions. His love for Ireland was a sentiment only: it never rose to the dignity of a passion. Not one of his patriotic songs breathes the fiery energy, the martyr zeal, the heroic hate and love, which pulsate in the veins of men who ardently sympathise with a people really oppressed, or presumed to be so. But let us hasten to say, that if there was little of the hero or martyr, there was nothing of the renegade or traitor, about Thomas Moore. The pension of three hundred a year obtained for him THOMAS MOORE. 211 of the crown by his influential friends was not the reward of baseness or of political tergiversation. It was the prize and reward of his eminence as a writer, and his varied social accomplishments. If he did not feel strongly, he at all events felt honestly ; and although he had no mission to evoke the lightning of the national spirit, and hurl its consuming fire at the men who, had they possessed the power, would have riveted the bondage of his people, he could and did soothe their angry paroxysms with lulling words of praise and hope, and, transforming their terribly real, physical, and moral griefs and ills into picturesque and senti- mental sorrows, awakened a languid admiration, and a passing sympathy for a nation which could boast such beautiful music, and whose woes were so agreeably, so charmingly sung. Liberal opinions Moore supported by tongue and pen, but then they were fashionable within a sufficiently extensive circle of notabilities, and had nothing of the extremes and downrightness of Radicalism about them. The political idiosyncrasy of Moore is developed in the same essential aspect in his memoir of Lord Edward Fitzgerald as in his national songs. There is nothing impassioned, nothing which hurries the pulse or kindles the eye — but a graceful regret, a carefully guarded appreciation of the acts and motives of that unfortunate and misguided noble- man run throughout. Moore was what men call a fair-weather politi- cian — which means, not that storms do not fre- quently surround them, but that by a prudent fore- thought, a happy avoidance of prematurely com- 212 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. mitting themselves, they contrive to make fair weather for themselves, however dark and tem- pestuous may be the time to other and less sagacious men, and who, when their sun does at last shine, come out with extreme effulgence and brilliancy. Moore, therefore, as a politician, was quite unexcep- tionable, though not eminent. He was at once a pensioned and unpurchased, and, we verily believe, unpurchasable partisan ; an honest, sincere, and very mild patriot; a faithful, and at the same time prudent and circumspect lover of his country, its people, and its faith. There are very high-sounding names in the list of political celebrities, of whom it would be well if such real though not highly flattering praise could be truly spoken. Moore's prose works require but little notice at our hands beyond that incidentally bestowed upon them in our passage through his works. None of them that we are acquainted with adds at all to the reputation for genius acquired by his poetry. The flow and rhyme of verse are indispensable to carry the reader through stories without probability or interest, and to render men and women, not only without originality — that frequently happens — but destitute of individualism, decently tolerable. Moore's contributions to the Edinburgh Review could scarcely have much enhanced the power and attractiveness of a periodical which in his time numbered amongst its contributors such names as Jeffrey, Brougham, Sydney Smith, Hallam, Macaulay, and others of that mint and standard. We give, however, Moore's description of the per- sonal appearance of Lord Byron, as a specimen of THOMAS MOORE. 213 his prose style : ' His eyes, though of a light gray, were capable of all extremes of expression, from the most joyous hilarity to the deepest sadness, from the very sunshine of benevolence to the most concen- trated scorn or rage. But it was in the mouth and chin that the great beauty as well as expression of his fine countenance lay. " Many pictures have been painted of him," says a fair critic of his features, " with various success ; but the excessive beauty of his lips escaped every painter and sculptor. In their ceaseless play they represented every emotion, whether pale with anger, curled in disdain, smiling in triumph, or dimpled with archness and love." His head was remarkably small — so much so as to be rather out of proportion with his face. The forehead, though a little too narrow, was high, and appeared more so from his having his hair (to pre- serve it, as he said) shaved over the temples, while the glossy dark-brown curls, clustering over his head, gave the finish to its beauty. When to this is added, that his nose, though handsomely, was rather too thickly shaped, that his teeth were white and regular, and his complexion colourless, as good an idea perhaps as it is in the power of mere words to convey may be conceived of his features. In height he was, as he himself has informed us, five feet eight inches and a half, and to the length of his limbs he attributed his being such a good swim- mer. His hands were very white, and — according to his own notion of the size of hands as indicating birth — aristocratically small. The lameness of his right foot, though an obstacle to grace, but little impeded the activity of his movements.' 214 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. It is, after all, in the home-life of individuals that their true character must be read and studied. The poet and the politician — the latter more especi- ally — dwell, as regards their vocations, apart from the household tests which really measure the worth, the truth, the kindliness, of individual men and women. Moore, we are pleased to be able to repeat, as a son, a husband, a father, a friend and neighbour, bore, and deservedly, the highest character. His domestic affections were ardent, tender, and sincere, and the brilliant accomplishments which caused his society to be courted by the great ones of the world shed its genial charm over the quiet fire- side at which sat his wife, and in whose light and warmth the children whose loss bowed him to the grave grew up only to bloom and perish. There have been much greater poets, more self- sacrificing, though perhaps no more sincere lovers of their country ; but in the intimate relations of domestic life, and the discharge of its common, every-day, but sacred obligations, there are few men who have borne a more unspotted and deservedly high reputation than Thomas Moore. One word as to the music — the airs of the melodies. They were for the most part, it is well known, arranged, and the accompaniments generally written, by Sir John Stevenson. The changes in the melody which not unfrequently occur, whether hurtfully or otherwise individual taste must deter- mine, were, Moore himself emphatically assures us, invariably his own. FRANCIS JEFFREY. HE national importance of Lord Jeffrey's career; his eminence as a man of letters, as a lawyer, and as a politician ; the public positions he occupied ; the influence on contemporary literature of his work as a critic ; and the permanent value of the political reforms which he assisted in carrying through, entitle him to perennial remem- brance. And certainly the most durable and fitting memorial of such a career is an impartial record of its leading events, the personal good qualities of its subject shining through it all. It will be found that the history of Francis Jeffrey is of interest to all classes. It furnishes one of those examples which are the peculiar glory of a free state ; for it exhibits talents, integrity, and per- severance — without extrinsic aid, and without one shade of subserviency or moral debasement — con- ducting its. possessor to the highest professional rank, to opulence and fame. It is instructive to note the stages in his onward march, as difficulties disappear, and honours gather round his name, and to perceive that, though endowed by nature with various and exquisite powers, he was no less remarkable for indefatigable study and patient application. It was by the union 218 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. of those intellectual gifts and acquirements with inflexible principle, with energy, and with the graces of private life, that he won his way to public and social distinction. His course was long and prosperous. Another race hath heen, and other palms are won. His work was accomplished. His early and courage- ous championship of toleration and freedom had been crowned with success ; the school of criticism, which he had founded and built up with such incessant care, was crowded with new and worthy disciples, and its essential principles had spread into all lands. He was still able, however, to serve his country on the judicial seat as a most upright, laborious, and penetrating judge. He was still able to counsel and direct, and to dispense a generous but not ostentatious hospitality. There was a sunset brilliancy and benignity in his later days that made his age beloved as well as venerable. It is to the honour of the profession of the law that some of its most eminent members have been great also in literature and science, and have dignified their legal career with important public services. The names of Sir Thomas More, of Bacon, Coke, and Selden — of Clarendon and Somers — of Mans- field, Blackstone, and Sir William Jones — the unrivalled forensic oratory of Erskine and the enlightened humanity of Romilly and Mackintosh — form a splendid bead-roll. The Scottish list is less brilliant; but we may instance, not without pride, Viscount Stair, whose Institutes form the text- book of the Scottish lawyer, and who was also a FRANCIS JEFFREY. 219 philosopher and statesman ; Lord Fountainhall, who resisted the tyranny of the Stuarts, and vindicated the independence of the bar ; Sir George Mackenzie, who, though the persecutor of the Covenanters, was an elegant author, the friend of Dryden, and the founder of the Advocates' Library; Duncan Forbes, the upright and intrepid judge, the scholar, and the pure self-sacrificing patriot ; and Lord Hailes, the early and accurate explorer of Scottish history, and the opponent of Gibbon. We may notice the meta- physical acuteness and learning of Karnes and Monboddo, and the accomplished associates of the Mirror and Lounger, with their chief, Henry Mac- kenzie, the ' Man of Feeling.' The world is slow to admit that a man can excel pre-eminently in more than one pursuit, but even the proverbial severity of legal studies need not exclude from more elegant attainments, and extensive legal practice need not extinguish taste or patriotism. Francis Jeffrey was born in the city of Edin- burgh on the 23d of October 1773, at 7 Charles Street, off George Square. He could boast of no high lineage. His family was one of humble industrious Edinburgh citizens ; but his father, Mr George Jeffrey, being bred to the law, had attained to the position of a depute-clerk of Session. He has been described as a writer or attorney in respectable practice, chiefly from the northern counties. His wife's name was Henrietta Loudon, and she was a native of Lanarkshire. This worthy, careful, and respected couple had several children, of whom Francis was the eldest. The 220 LITERARY CELERRITIES. family afterwards removed to Buchanan's Court, Lawnmarket, which some accounts wrongfully give as being the birthplace of Jeffrey. The Lawn- market is one of the upper sections of that great line of buildings extending about a mile in length from Holyrood Palace to the Castle, and which, from the stupendous height of the houses, their air of antiquity, the steepness of the ascent, the crowded and various population, and the historical associations connected with the Old Town, is perhaps the most remarkable and unique street in Europe. The lines of Scott — which it is impossible not to recall — give a glowing yet accurate picture of the outline of this great thoroughfare : Such dusky grandeur clothed the height Where the huge castle holds its state, And all the steep slope down, Whose ridgy back heaves to the sky, Piled deep and massy, close and high — Mine own romantic town ! Francis Jeffrey was of a slight and delicate frame. From his infancy he evinced the greatest quickness of apprehension and lively curiosity ; and he could read well when only in his fourth year. Alexander Smellie, printer (son of William Smellie the naturalist, and correspondent of Burns), used to relate the story of Jeffrey's debut at school. It took place at a seminary situated in a den of the Old Town, called Bailie Fyfe's Close. Smellie was in the Collection Class, so called from the book taught being a Collection of the Beauties of English Authors, and which was usually intro- FKANCIS JEFFREY. 221 duced about the third year of an ordinary English course. Jeffrey came, a small creature in petticoats, and was put into the lowest class. From the mar- vellous quickness of parts shown by the tiny scholar, he was soon transferred to the Collection Class, the top of which he gained in half an hour. Cockburn, the schoolmaster, prophesied that the little fellow would come to something ; and Smellie cried heartily at being so completely beaten by a child not yet deemed fit for male attire. Having made rapid progress at a day-school, he was sent to the High School of Edinburgh, and in October 1781 (when he had about completed his eighth year) was entered in the second Latin class, then taught by Mr Luke Fraser. He remained under Mr Fraser four years, until October 1785, when, according to the usual routine, he was trans- ferred to the class of the rector, Dr Adam, the author of the Roman Antiquities, where he con- tinued two years. In Fraser s class Jeffrey dis- tinguished himself; although in the higher depart- ment of the rector he never attained the honour of dux. He was, however, a good Latin scholar; and in 1825, when the High School was rebuilt, chiefly by public subscription, he signified his gratitude to the institution by contributing the sum of fifty pounds. It was during his last session at the High School that he saw Robert Burns. He was walking along the High Street, when he was attracted by the appearance of a man standing on the pavement. Some one standing at a shop door tapped him on the shoulder, and said: 'Ay, laddie, you may weel look at that man: that's 222 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. Robert Burns.' He never saw the poet again, but he used to dwell with pleasure on the incident. From the High School of Edinburgh Jeffrey pro- ceeded to the university of Glasgow. He matricu- lated as a student of the logic class, under Pro- fessor Jardine, in the session of 1787-8, having just completed his fourteenth year. Glasgow was then famous for its professors. Mr Young, who held the Greek chair, was one of the most eminent philologists of his day, and a highly successful teacher. Professor Jardine was not less able in his department of logic and belles lettres; and Jeffrey said he owed to the judicious instructions of this gentleman his taste for letters, and any literary distinction he had attained. Dr John Millar was then professor of law ; and being him- self a zealous Whig, he seems to have instilled his own opinions into the minds of his admiring pupils. 'By his learning, sagacity, and wit,' says Thomas Campbell, ' John Millar made many converts.' Jeffrey has also borne testimony to Millar's exten- sive learning and penetrating judgment, and to the 'magical vivacity' which he infused into his lectures and conversation. The chair of moral philosophy was held by Professor Arthur, but his great predecessor, Dr Thomas Reid, still super- intended the progress of the class — 'hallowing,' as Jeffrey has finely remarked, 'with the sanctity of his venerable age, and the primitive simplicity of his character, the scene over which his genius has thrown so imperishable a lustre.' With such able and congenial instructors, it is to be regretted that Jeffrey did not remain longer FRANCIS JEFFREY. 223 than two sessions. His academical career was desultory and incomplete; but he was always pre- paring himself for the profession of the law, to which he was early destined. In December 1789, his name appears in the records of the university of Edinburgh as a student in the Scots Law Class, taught by Professor Hume. The following winter he was again at the university of Glasgow. In 1791 he proceeded to Oxford, and was entered of Queens' College. His journey southwards had been very leisurely performed, for he was twelve days in getting to London, and he remained a week in the metropolis. He seems to have entered Oxford with no prepossessions in favour of that ancient seat of learning ; and its classical renown had no inspiration for the young metaphysical law- student. It was a jocular remark of Johnson that much might be made of a Scotchman if he was caught young; but Jeffrey would not be caught. In a letter written six days after his arrival, and addressed to one of his college companions in Glasgow, he says : ' Separated as I am from all my friends, and confined to the society of the students of one college, I shall not cease to regret the liberty and variety of intercourse which was permitted, and I hope not abused, at Glasgow. I have been too much in the company of ladies and relations to be much interested with the conversa- tion of pedants, coxcombs, and strangers.' In a second letter to the same friend, without date, but apparently about a month after the former, the young student writes : ' You ask me to drop you 224 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. some English ideas. My dear fellow, I am as much, nay, more a Scotchman, than I was while an inhabitant of Scotland. My opinions, ideas, prejudices, and systems, are all Scotch. The only part of a Scotchman I mean to abandon is the language, and language is all that I expect to learn in England. And indeed, except it be prayers and drinking, I see nothing else that it seems possible to acquire in this place.' He then describes the scenes of uproar and dissipation which took place among the students, and the fragments, of broken doors, windows, and stairs, which lay scattered about. Of the fellows and heads of colleges he gives a very unfavour- able account. ' They are men,' he says, ' who had in their youth, by dint of regular, persevering, and indefatigable study, painfully acquired a con- siderable knowledge of the requisite branches of science, which knowledge served only to make them pedants, and to render still more austere and dis- gusting that torpid insensibility and awkwardness which they had contracted in the course of their painful retirement from the world — men who accus- tomed themselves to a vile and sycophantical rever- ence to their superiors while they had them, and now insist upon a similar adoration and observance to themselves. If you add to this a violent attach- ment to the game of whist, and to the wine called port, you will have a pretty accurate conception of the venerable men to whose hands I am now committed.' In a third letter he indulges in the same querulous and lachrymose strain: the home- sickness was evidently strong upon him : FRANCIS JEFFREY. 225 'As for the times, I know little more of them than that they are such as have succeeded to the past, and must pass away before the future can come on; that they are measured out by hours, and days, and years ; and that people observe their lapse with the same testifications of joy and sorrow as have divided their sensations from the creation of the world. To say the truth, I know less of the world than almost any man alive in it. I hardly ever see a newspaper, politics are banished from our conversation, and a man may spend ten years in Oxford without hearing anything but the history of foxes and fox-chases, and riots and trials. Such an institute as your Juridical Society, which seems to occupy so much of your time, would have no more chance of succeeding here than an institution which required a sermon from each of its members once a week. The collected and accu- mulated study of an Oxonian in a whole year is not in general equivalent to the reflection you bestow upon one of your orations. But I would labour to no purpose to give you an idea of the indolence which prevails here. For my own part, I would attempt to persuade you that I am an exception; but I hate to tell lies, and I had better say nothing at all about it.' These graphic sketches are probably a little exaggerated. The writer, like most young artists, may have been more intent on force and liveliness of colouring than on correctness of outline or literal truth. His opportunities for observation had at least been too limited to justify such wholesale censure of the fellows and heads of colleges. It o 226 LITERAEY CELEBRITIES. is clear that the atmosphere of Oxford did not agree with his Scottish tastes and feelings. He might not have been prepared to appreciate the importance which is attached to classical learning at that university, and his patience would be sorely tried by the syllogisms of Aristotle and the system of college tutors, so different from popular lectures in natural and moral philosophy, and from the social studies to which he had been accustomed. That there was at that time, and long previously, as well as afterwards, no small share of bigotry and careless discipline in the colleges and halls of Oxford, has been proved from various sources. Jeffrey's statements agree in a remarkable manner — even to the port-wine potations — with the experiences of Gibbon, which he could not have seen (for the Memoir by Lord Sheffield was not published till 1795); and it is obvious, from the constitution of the colleges, that, along with the quiet and retire- ment of the monastic life, a considerable portion of its indolence and prejudice had descended to those venerable institutions. The letters of Jeffrey at this early period evince his acuteness and discrimination, his love of intel- lectual pursuits, and that strong attachment to home and friends which marked him throughout life. Even the style of his composition seems to have been formed. Its flexibility, vigour, and copiousness are already there, and no small portion of the polish which afterwards more highly dis- tinguished it. In nearly all of his letters he makes apologies for writing so much at length, and this was another peculiarity in his character. He was FRANCIS JEFFREY. 227 always a voluminous letter-writer, and was seldom a day absent from his family or familiar friends without communicating with them in long and lively epistles. It is a tradition at Queen's College that Jeffrey left Oxford in disgust at the intense idleness which prevailed at the time. He remained only one session, and consequently did not graduate at the university. On his return to Edinburgh he resumed his legal studies. In the session of 1791-2 he again attended the Scots Law Class under Professor Hume. In the session of 1792-3 he repeated his attendance at this class, adding to it the study of civil law under Professor Wilde, and that of civil history and Greek and Koman antiquities under Professor Tytler. He is not entered as having attended any of Dugald Stewart's classes, which is the more remark- able, considering his partiality for ethical studies, and the high reputation of the professor. He may, however, have been present occasionally at the lectures without being enrolled as a student. In December 1792 Jeffrey became a member of the Speculative Society — an extra-academical school of oratory and debate, and of literary composition, connected with the university of Edinburgh, and sanctioned by the Senatus Academicus. Institu- tions of this kind have long been popular with young and ambitious students, as affording a ready mode of trying their scarce-Hedged powers in generous rivalry with their fellows, and of pre- paring them for a higher flight. Of all our modern orators or statesmen, the second William Pitt was perhaps the only one who, when barely of age, 228 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. started into full maturity as a public speaker. The flower and the fruit were of simultaneous growth. But his rivals and compatriots, Burke, Sheridan, Curran, &c, were early members of Debat- ing Clubs. The Speculative Society of Edinburgh is an institution of a higher class : the members are nearly all, or have been, students at the university. They are required to produce written essays, as well as take part in debates on questions of political economy, legislation, and philosophical history ; and the rules with regard to attendance, the selection of topics, and the conduct of the proceedings, are judicious and rigid. The society has been in exist- ence since the year 1764, and many of the greatest Scottish lawyers and professors disciplined their minds in its exciting discussions. There Dugald Stewart, the most accomplished and eloquent of all commentators on moral 'philosophy, read his first essay; there Sir James Mackintosh made his first speech ; there Playfair, so distinguished in physical science, and the classic Dr James Gregory, found a fitting audience. Divines mingled with lawyers and philosophers ; theologians, such as Professor Hill and Sir Henry Moncreiff, were members of the Speculative. Baron Hume the able lecturer on Scots law, John Clerk (Lord Eldon), Malcolm Laing the historian, Benjamin Constant the French economist and statesman, and Sir Astley Cooper the eminent physician, participated at the same period in its debates ; and when Jeffrey entered, to add new attraction and celebrity to the society, he found Walter Scott officiating as its secretary. FRANCIS JEFFREY. 229 In a few years he was joined by Henry Brougham, by Francis Horner, John Archibald Murray, James Moncreiff, and Henry Cockburn. Three students destined to eminence as British statesmen — the Marquis of Lansdowne, Lord Glenelg, and Lord John Kussell — were subsequently members of this society. An institution boasting such an array of varied and commanding talent, and enriched with historical associations, might well breathe an in- vigorating spirit and generous emulation into all its members. Its fame and importance imposed the necessity for careful preparation ; knowledge was acquired in its debates ; and the practice it gave in the mechanical part of public speaking was of inestimable importance to the future advocate or senator. The meetings of the Speculative Society were held once a week in the evening, during the winter session of the university, from November to May. At the meeting when Jeffrey first saw Scott, who was for several years secretary and treasurer, the future prince of novelists read an essay on ballads, which so much interested the new member, that he requested to be introduced to him. Jeffrey called on him next evening, and they adjourned to a tavern and supped together. ' Such,' says Lockhart, 'was the commencement of an acquaint- ance, which by degrees ripened into friendship, between the two most distinguished men of letters whom Edinburgh produced in their time.' The secretary must have been gratified by the kindred ardour which his new acquaintance evinced in the business of the society. He was a frequent speaker, 230 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. and during four sessions, from 1794-5 to 1797-8, he was annually elected one of the presidents. We find he brought forward the following ques- tions : 1793, Feb. 12. Is a System of influence necessary to the Support of a Free Government ? Carried in the affirmative by 8 to 3 votes. ii Dec. 17. Is the National Debt to be considered as a Grievance ? Carried unanimously in the affirmative. 1794, Jan. 21. Is Monarchy more favourable than Demo- cracy to Excellence in the Arts and Sciences ? Carried in the affirmative by 3 to 1. ii Feb. 3. Whether is Theism or Polytheism most natural to a rude state ? Carried by a majority of 3 that polytheism is most natural. The essays contributed by Jeffrey were on the following subjects : 1. Nobility ; 2. Effects derived to Europe from the discovery of America ; 3. Authen- ticity of Ossian's Poems (a subject on which he had already produced two essays) ; 4. Metrical Harmony ; 5. The Character of Commercial Nations. The titles of these early prelections indicate the writer's prevailing tastes and studies. In the discussions of the Speculative Society questions of party politics and religion were pro- hibited ; and in 1798, when the celebrated Irish barrister, Thomas Addis Emmet, became a member of the Executive Directory of the Irish Union, and was privy to the carrying on a treasonable corre- spondence with France, his name was expunged from the records of the society. This was done FRANCIS JEFFREY. 231 at the instance of Henry Brougham. But notwith- standing the prudent caution and abstinence of the members, the Speculative Society fell under the ban of one of the political parties of the day. The French Kevolution had roused the fears and jealousies of men in authority. The Reflections of Burke, followed by the Vindicice Gallicce of Mackintosh, had made political discussion the favourite exercise of young and ardent minds. Then came the stormy debates in parliament, the secret associations, and state trials throughout the kingdom — all filling the minds of the timid and anxious with suspicion and alarm. These were years of agitation and doubt, during which the constitu- tion was in danger both from the excesses of revolu- tionary zeal and the uncontrolled exercise of arbitrary power. The crisis passed, but parties were not reconciled : They stood aloof, the scars remaining, Like cliffs that had been rent asunder. Jeffrey was no unmoved spectator of the rapidly shifting scenes of this great drama. He had been present at the trials of Muir, Palmer, and Gerald (1793-4-5), and was deeply affected by what he witnessed. The lofty bearing of the accused parties, their romantic enthusiasm, and the severity of the sentences inflicted on them, deepened his convictions in favour of reform. Another eminent Scotsman — Thomas Campbell, then a youth of six- teen — had walked from Glasgow to Edinburgh to witness the trial of Gerald, and from that day was a sworn enemy to oppression. Jeffrey was less 232 LITERAEY CELEBRITIES. of a democrat than Campbell. He was a Whig of the school of Fox and Burke, before Burke had receded from his ancient principles, scared by the horrors of the French Revolution. His leanings were all towards the popular branch of the con- stitution, but without the slightest tincture of demo- cratic violence. He conceived that the prerogatives of the crown had encroached on the rights of the commons, and required to be curtailed. He saw state prosecutions conducted with oppressive rigour, and he contended for freedom of opinion, and the impartial administration of justice. There was a native independence in his character, and a jealousy of all power and control, which kept him apart from the slavish adherents of party and the unscrupulous dispensers of patronage. The suspicion that the Speculative Society, under the guise of academical debate, had been converted into a political club, led to the secession of above twenty of its members. Jeffrey exerted himself to protect the institution. He joined in drawing up an earnest appeal ; and committees of the Senatus Academicus and the town-council having investi- gated the charge, it was found to be groundless. The society soon regained its popularity and influ- ence; and from 1797 to 1805 — with the exception of the temporary cloud we have alluded to — has been considered the most splendid period of its history. Long afterwards, Jeffrey delighted to recall his connection with the society. He was present at two great anniversary dinners of the old members — one in 1814, and another in 1835. At the latter he presided. Several of his early associates were FRANCIS JEFFEEY. 233 gone — dropped through the broken arches of the Bridge of Life. Horner had been cut off in his prime, and the unrivalled genius of Scott had been extinguished. Mackintosh also had departed. But around him were Cockburn, Murray, and Moncreiff — judges — and he had risen to be a judge himself. Henry Brougham was a peer, and had been chancellor of England. These were examples of the advantages of such institutions in training men at an early period of life to vigorous exertion and to the use of their minds. ' For my own part/ said Jeffrey, ' in looking back to that period of my life when I had experi- ence of this society, I can hardly conceive anything in after-life more to be envied than the recollection of that first burst of intellect, when, free from scholastic restraint, and throwing off the thraldom of a somewhat servile docility, the mind first aspired to reason and question nature for itself; and half wondering at its own temerity, first ventured with- out a guide into the mazes of speculation, or tried its unaided flight into the regions of intel- lectual adventure, to revel uncontrolled through the bright and boundless realms of literature and science.' Having duly qualified himself by his studies in the classes of Scots and Civil Law, Jeffrey passed his trials, and was called to the bar. The official record bears, that on the 13th of December 1794 Francis Jeffrey was 'publicly examined on Title 7, Lib. 50, Pand. de Legationibus, and was found suffi- ciently qualified.' The minute is signed by the 234 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. witty and famous Henry Erskine, then dean of the Faculty of Advocates. The study of the Pandects and Institutes — Roman jurisprudence and Scots law — would now be varied by attendance at the Parlia- ment House and the drudgery of Session papers. Jeffrey applied himself with his usual energy to his profession. Success at the bar, however, is seldom attained until after years of dreary toil and per- severance. Sir Walter Scott, though assisted by business from his father — a Writer to the Signet, in good practice — was four years an advocate ere his professional earnings amounted to £100 per annum. He ascribed his failure mainly 'to the prejudices of the Scotch solicitors against employ- ing, in weighty cases at least, any barrister supposed to be strongly imbued with the love of literature ; ' and he instanced the case of his friend Jeffrey as almost the solitary instance within his experience of such prejudices being entirely overcome. Overcome they were at last, but not without a tedious and disheartening probation. The really valuable part of the practice was engrossed by his seniors, who had toiled up the steep ascent, or by plodding junior counsel, who never diverged into the flowery paths of literature, or presumed to meddle with politics. So late as 1803, in writing to his brother in America, and discussing the possible effect which literary pursuits might have on his business, Jeffrey expressed indifference on the sub- ject, because, he said, he had never in any one year made £100 by his profession. His indifferent success, however, did not prevent him from assuming the dignity of a housekeeper, and giving, as Lord Bacon FRANCIS JEFFREY. 235 has said, 'hostages to fortune.' On the 1st of November 1801, Jeffrey was married to Miss Catherine Wilson, daughter of the Rev. Charles Wilson, professor of ecclesiastical history in St Mary's College, St Andrews. This lady (described by Mrs Grant of Laggan as a 'beloved and very deserving wife ' ) survived the union only a few years : she died August 8, 1805. Their social circle had received a valuable addition by the arrival in Edinburgh, in the year 1797, of an accomplished Englishman — the Rev. Sydney Smith, one of the most original and genial of wits, with the classical learning of an Oxford M.A. ; and with a fund of natural sagacity, toleration, and manly simplicity, which kept him free from the slightest tinge of pedantry. Sydney Smith had been a curate, as he has humor- ously told the world, 'in the middle of Salisbury Plain ' — at Netheravon, near Amesbury. ' The squire of the parish,' he adds, ' took a fancy to me, and requested me to go with his son to reside at the uni- versity of Weimar. Before we could get there, Ger- many became the seat of war; and in stress of politics we put into Edinburgh, where I remained five years. Among the first persons with whom I became acquainted were Lord Jeffrey, Lord Murray, and Lord Brougham ; all of them maintaining opinions upon political subjects a little too liberal for the dynasty of Dundas, then exercising supreme power over the northern division of the island. One day we happened to meet, in the eighth or ninth story, or flat, in Buccleuch Place, the elevated residence of the then Mr Jeffrey. I proposed that we should 236 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. set up a Review ; this was acceded to with acclama- tion. I was appointed editor, and remained long- enough in Edinburgh to edit the first number of the Edinburgh Revieiv. The motto I proposed for the Review was : Tenui musam meditamur avena (We cultivate literature upon a little oatmeal). But this was too near the truth to be admitted ;. and so we took our present grave motto from Publius Syrus* of whom none of us had, I am sure, ever read a single line. And so began what has since turned out to be a very important and able journal. When I left Edinburgh, it fell into the stronger hands of Lord Jeffrey and Lord Brougham, and reached the highest point of popularity and success.' We are happy at being able to produce a still more interesting and detailed statement of the cir- cumstances attending the commencement of the Review — a document written by Lord Jeffrey, at the request of the late Robert Chambers, in November 1846. It is as follows : ' I cannot say exactly where the project of the Edinburgh Review was first talked of among the projectors. But the first serious consultations about it — and which led to our application to a publisher — were held in a small house, where I then lived, * [Judex damnatur cum nocens absolvitor. Literally : 'The judge is condemned when the guilty is absolved.' This famous motto was much canvassed at the time. The adventurers, it was said, had hung out the bloody flag on their title-page. ' It was a sort of imprecation on themselves and their infant publication, if they withheld their arm from battle for pity, need, or respect of persons.' — Scott.] FRANCIS JEFFREY. 237 in Buccleuch Place (I forget the number). They were attended by S. Smith, F. Horner, Dr Thomas Brown, Lord Murray, and some of them also by Lord Webb Seymour, Dr John Thomson, and Thomas Thomson. The first three numbers were given to the publisher — he taking the risk, and defraying the charges. There was then no individual editor ; but as many of us as could be got to attend used to meet in a dingy room of Willison's printing- office in Craig's Close, where the proofs of our own articles were read over and remarked upon, and attempts made also to sit in judgment on the few manuscripts which were then offered by strangers. But we had seldom patience to go through with this; and it was soon found necessary to have a respon- sible editor, and the office was pressed upon me. About the same time Constable was told that he must allow ten guineas a sheet to the contributors, to which he at once assented ; and not long after, the minimum was raised to sixteen guineas, at which it remained during my reign. Two-thirds of the articles were paid much higher — averaging, I should think, from twenty to twenty-five guineas a sheet on the whole number. I had, I might say, an unlimited discretion in this respect, and must do the publishers the justice to say that they never made the slightest objection. Indeed, as we all knew that they had (for a long time at least) a very great profit, they probably felt that they were at our mercy. 'Smith was by far the most timid of the con- federacy, and believed that, unless our incognito was strictly maintained, we could not go on a day ; 238 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. and this was his object for making us hold our dark divans at Willison's office, to which he insisted on our repairing singly, and by back approaches or different lanes ! He also had so strong an impression of Brougham's indiscretion and rashness, that he would not let him be a member of our association, though wished for by all the rest. He was admitted, however, after the third number, and did more work for us than anybody. Brown took offence at some alterations Smith had made in a trifling article of his in the second number, and left us thus early: publishing at the same time in a magazine the fact of his secession — a step which we all deeply regretted, and thought scarcely justified by the pro- vocation. Nothing of the kind occurred ever after.' In this document the distinguished writer has made no mention of his own emoluments as editor of the Review. The principal publisher was Archibald Constable — a liberal and enterprising bookseller, the Maecenas of Scottish authors, whose highest pride it was to elevate the literary repu- tation of his country, and associate his name with all its triumphs. Constable remunerated the editor of the Edinburgh Review on a scale of what must then have appeared princely liberality. From 1803 to 1809 a sum of 200 guineas was given for editing each number. The account-books are missing for three years after 1809, but from 1813 on to 1826 Jeffrey is credited 'for editing' £700 a number, so that his salary appears to have been more than trebled. The youth of the Edinburgh critics was at first a fertile subject of comment and ridicule. The Review FRANCIS JEFFREY. 239 was pronounced to be the result of ' a conspiracy of beardless boys,' and the veteran Richard Cumberland wrote against the young gentlemen of the Edinburgh Review. It may be as well, therefore, for the sake of accuracy, to note the respective ages of the lead- ing contributors. The youngest of the band, it will be seen, was about as old as Pitt when he became a cabinet minister and chancellor of the exchequer. In 1802 Sydney Smith was in his 31st year, Jeffrey was 29, Dr Thomas Brown 24, Horner 24, Brougham 23, Allen 32, Dr John Thomson 38, and Thomas Thomson 32. The title of the work, and some parts of its general plan, were most probably suggested by a periodical of a superior class, bearing the name of The Edinburgh Review, which was started in 1755 under the auspices of Adam Smith, Robertson, and Blair, but which was discontinued for want of encouragement after two half-yearly numbers had been issued. As a medium between the half-yearly plan and the ordinary monthly term, the quarterly form of publication was a happy and judicious arrangement. It allowed the critics a greater variety of selection than the shorter period could furnish, as well as more time and space for their lucubrations. They were not under the necessity of noticing the trivial and ephemeral works which the press throws off in the summer months when publishers rarely launch their important ventures, but which were indispensable towards filling the pages of the monthly miscellany ; and they had no occasion, within their enlarged bounds, to continue any article from one number to another. Thus a fenerally crave and permanent character was given 240 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. to the work, distinguishing it from all its critical contemporaries of that period. The liberal copy- right allowance made to the writers was also a novel and judicious feature in the scheme. It tempted and rewarded study, and no contributor could be degraded by what was one of the con- ditions of authorship imposed upon all. A still more favourable circumstance for the new adventurers was the low state into which periodical criticism had then fallen. The Monthly Review was the principal critical journal of that day, and it had been much improved in its management since the time that poor Goldsmith groaned under the tyranny of Griffiths and his wife. Sir James Mackintosh, William Taylor of Norwich, Southey, and other men of talent, made it the repository of their political and literary theories. There were other respectable literary journals, but none of an independent or commanding character, none supported by an organ- ised body of able well-paid contributors, working on a regular plan, and exempt from bookselling influence and control. The general complexion of the whole was that of insipid compliment and tame uniformity, and both writing and quotation were dealt out in scanty measure. The advent of the northern Khadamanthus in the midst of this rose- water criticism was an event startling to authors and booksellers, but sure to arrest in a strong degree the attention of the public, who have a malicious satisfaction in witnessing high pretensions brought low, or drowsy learning and gentle dullness routed by the lively forces of wit and satire. The first number of the Edinburgh Review FRANCIS JEFFREY. 241 appeared on the 1st of November 1802. The greater part had been written, and even printed, some months previous, but it was suggested by Constable that the publication should be deferred until the commencement of the winter season. The number of copies printed was 750. The demand, however, exceeded this limited supply : 750 more were thrown off, and successive editions still more numerous were called for. In 1808 the quarterly circulation of the Review had risen to about 9000 ; and it is believed to have reached its maximum about 1813, when 12,000 or 13,000 copies were printed. Before the poems of Byron and the novels of Scott had taken the public, as it were, by storm, this success was unprecedented. Never again perhaps will one generation of critics have such a splendid harvest to reap — such a magni- ficent vintage to gather in. Could the editor have surveyed the thirty years' produce that lay before him, awaiting his critical distribution, he must have been overwhelmed by its prodigality and richness. There was the poetry of Crabbe, of Campbell, Moore, Southey, Coleridge, and Wordsworth — types of different schools; there was the gorgeous chivalry of Scott, with his long file of novels and romances, like an endless procession of the representatives of all ages, conditions, and countries; there was the oriental splendour and grace of Byron, alternating with his fierce energy and gloomy philosophy — the still more erring and extravagant genius of Shelley — and the youthful bloom of Keats ; there were the tales of Maria Edgeworth, of Miss Austen, Gait, Wilson, and other not unworthy associates; the 242 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. histories of Hallam, and the historical pictures of Macaulay; innumerable biographies of great con- temporaries who had gone before — the Sheridans, Currans, Wilberforces, and Hebers ; innumerable books of travels, that threw open the world to our curious gaze ; the gossiping treasures of Strawberry- Hill and other family repositories, that revived the wits, and poets, and beauties of a past age; the diaries of Evelyn and Pepys ; the inimitable letters of Cowper drawn from their sacred privacy; the policy and intrigues of courts laid bare ; the whole world of literature and the living world of Europe stirred to their inmost depths. What rich materials in the wars and politics of the times — in the rise and fall of Napoleon — in the overthrow of kings and dynasties — in the perturbations even of the mighty heart of England throbbing to be free ! What discoveries in science and the arts — steam, gas, railways, and all that facilitates and sweetens social intercourse ! Over such vast and interesting fields had the Edinburgh Review to travel, moving firmly under the guidance of its editor, with elate and confident step, and attended by thousands who caught its enthusiasm, and echoed its sentiments and opinions. We have traced some of the circumstances which imparted interest and novelty to the plan- of the Review. Its grand distinction, however, and the genuine source of its success, was the ability and genius it displayed, coupled with the perfect independence and boldness of the writers. Within the small circle of its projectors were men qualified to deal with questions in physical science, in political FKANCIS JEFFKEY. 243 economy (the chosen field of Horner), in politics (the favourite ground of Brougham), in law, poetry, and the belles lettres. They had wit, irony, and sarcasm at will, with the higher attributes of eloquence, correct principles of reasoning and analysis, strong sense, and a love of freedom. They were free from all external restraint ; they were young, and had both fortune and reputation to achieve. To give consistency and stability to the scheme, the editor laboured with unceasing attention and judgment. No other member of the fraternity could have supplied his place. His own contribu- tions were also from the first the most popular and effective in the work. He selected the departments of poetry, biography, and moral philosophy, with occasional excursions into the neighbouring domains of history and politics. The first number of the Keview displayed the leading characteristics of his style and manner. It could not show the whole extent and richness of the vein, but we saw its peculiar quality, and could form an estimate of its probable value. The opening paper is a critique on the now-forgotten work of M. Mounier on the Causes of the French Revolution, and it is dis- tinguished by great ability in tracing and com- paring political events, and trying them by the tests of history and philosophy. Some of the reviewer's distinctions and illustrations are very happy, and a high moral tone is preserved throughout the whole. This first effort is a key-note to much of Jeffrey's reasoning and to his clear and pointed expression. Subsequently his style became more loose and oratorical — from his increased practice at the bar, 244 LITEEARY CELEBRITIES. and the haste with which he wrote many of his reviews — but it gained also in power and copious- ness. To the state of society and literature in France at this period he paid much attention ; and his admirable articles on Marmontel, on Grimm, on Madame du Duffand, &c. are invaluable for the moral lessons they inculcate, and the earnestness with which the importance of our social and domestic duties is portrayed and recommended. The reviewer penetrated through the gaiety and glitter of the salons of Paris, and showed how little of real worth or of real happiness was contained amidst all their splendour. He delighted to expatiate on the superiority of those humble virtues which are of daily use and benefit, which brighten the domestic hearth, and shed contentment and joy on all the private and ordinary relations of life. And in this respect the example of the critic was in beautiful accordance with his precepts. He was the most affectionate relation — 'not in the least ambitious of new or distinguished acquaintances, nor by any means fond of large parties or the show and bustle of life ; there was no one to whom all the charities of home and kindred were more endeared/ In the first number of the Review Jeffrey also propounded his canons of poetical criticism, and began his warfare with the Lake Poets. He pro- duced an elaborate critique on Southey's Thalaba, prefaced with observations on the perverted taste for simplicity, which he considered as the dis- tinguishing mark of the modern school of poetry, of which Wordsworth, Coleridge, Southey, and Lamb FRANCIS JEFFREY. 245 were represented as the masters or disciples. The gauntlet was thus thrown down. It was obvious that the great critic of the Edinburgh Review had taken his stand on certain limited principles of taste, and that, however tolerant he might be of political innovation, he was to be strongly conserva- tive in poetry. His rules were calculated to make correct poets, not great ones. He forgot that The native bards first plunged the deep Before the artful dared to leap. The same circumstances which had convulsed society, and laid bare the whole organisation of governments, gave an impulse to the powers of creative genius, and led it into new fields free from the convention- alism of the old regime. Notwithstanding all the errors and puerilities of the modern school — aided by importations from the German dramatists — it had infinitely more of nature, of originality and boldness, than the artificial system it sought to supplant. The critic's severe and restricted standard of poetical excellence was further illustrated by his criticism on Scott's poetry. He concluded that the popularity of the Lay of the Last Minstrel would be obstructed by the locality of the subject, while this very circumstance was in reality one great cause of its success. The old Border country was consecrated to song and romantic traditions. The aged minstrel, the chivalrous and superstitious incidents, and the feudal manners of the poem, were all native to the ' Braes of Yarrow,' and familiar to the lovers of poetry. Marmion was still more unmercifully dealt with. Its errors were dwelt 246 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. upon with iteration and emphasis, and little or no sympathy was evinced with respect to the nobler passages which redeem the work, and which rendered it so universally popular. The miscalculations of the critic as to the probable success of Scott's poems, and the effect of such minute painting of ancient manners, arose from the limited faith he had in the power of genius to mould the national taste and awaken enthusiasm. Scott broke through the rules of criticism in writing a modern romance of chivalry, but he infused into it the life and fire of genius, and many of the popular elements of poetry. In the same number of the Review which con- tained the depreciatory critique on Marmion, appeared one not less elaborate on the poems of Crabbe. The simultaneous publication of the two articles was an unlucky combination, for the prin- ciples laid down in one cannot be well reconciled with those in the other. If the ingenious critic be right in condemning the minute descriptions of Scott as deficient in interest and dignity, the same rule must be applicable to Crabbe, who is still more prolix and minute, and whose descriptions are of the humblest and lowest character. The account of Lord Marmion, with his mail of Milan steel, the blue ribbons on his horse's mane, and his blue velvet housings — even the attire of his men-at-arms — was as natural and necessary to the poet of chivalry as the cottage furniture, the cock-fights, the dirt and squalor of village life, were necessary to enable the poet of the poor to complete his pictures. The critic was inconsistent. Scott had not profited by his former schooling, and the lash, therefore, was FRANCIS JEFFREY. 247 laid on without mercy. In Crabbe, too, there was more of real life, of keen observation, and simple pathos, which possessed a greater charm for the mind and feelings of Jeffrey than the warlike chivalry and tournaments of the middle ages. He saw and felt the truth of these village paintings, and he forgave their Dutch-like minuteness in con- sideration of their reality. The works of Campbell and Eogers Jeffrey was peculiarly qualified to feel and appreciate, and friendship for the authors may have led to a warmth of praise unusual with the stern reviewer. Poetry has many mansions, and even Francis Jeffrey had not then a key to all, or else he wilfully refused to enter some of its most select and august chambers. In the epic creations of Southey, and particularly in his Curse of Kehama, there are sublime conceptions, and an affluence of poetical resources, which the critic did not rightly estimate ; the fine imagination and rich diction of Coleridge he neglected or contemned; and to Wordsworth he was uniformly unjust. It required some courage to reprint in 1844 the critique on The Excursion, beginning 'This will never do,' after the world had decided that it would do, and had reversed his judgment by calling for successive editions of the poem. The purity and elevation of Words- worth's poetry, his profound sympathy with external nature and humanity, and the consecration of his whole mind and genius to his art, would have formed a noble and congenial theme for Jeffrey; but he saw only the puerilities and ridiculous theories of some of the Lyrical Ballads, which no more repre- 248 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. sent the great body of Wordsworth's poetry than the weeds of a garden represent its flowers and fruits. In his disquisitions on the old masters of our literature Jeffrey did good service. His reviews of the writers of the Elizabethan age and of later periods are generally excellent. He revelled among the creations of Shakspeare, Massinger, and Beaumont and Fletcher, and dwelt with cordial delight on the ornate graces of Jeremy Taylor, or Sir Thomas Browne, as on the milder charms of Addison, the sweep of Dryden's versification, and the pointed brilliancy of Pope. The modern revival of a taste for those great authors may be partly ascribed to the Edinburgh Review. And for the critic's severity in assailing those on the lower slopes of Parnassus who departed from such models, he had this excuse — that he conceived it to be his duty to punish all sins of irregularity and conceit, that he might keep the public taste from corruption, and reform the offender. He had another apology common to periodical writers, and which, in his genial frankness and acknowledged supremacy, he could afford to produce. When recanting some of his strictures on the character of Burns, he said : ' A certain tone of exaggeration is incident, we fear, to the sort of writing in which we are engaged. Beckoning a little too much per- haps on the dullness of our readers, we are often unconsciously led to overstate our sentiments in order to make them understood ; and when a little controversial warmth is added to a little love of effect, an excess of colouring is apt to steal over FRANCIS JEFFREY. 249 the canvas, which ultimately offends no eye so much as our own.' He seems also to have aimed at blending a conversational freedom and careless- ness with his criticisms, as if ambitious, like Con- greve, to be more of the gentleman than the author. This contributed to the tone of superiority which the Review assumed from its commencement, and which the suffering authors felt to be peculiarly galling. It unquestionably made the articles more piquant; and when the reviewer rose above the conventional level, the contrast afforded by his finer passages was the more conspicuous and effective. If he had been more profound in imagination or feeling, he must have lost some of that airy elegance, and fancy, and spontaneous grace, which con- tributed so much to his success. Another distinctive quality was the great taste with which Jeffrey made selections from the works he reviewed. What- ever was new or striking, solemn, picturesque, or figurative in language or matter, was sure to be extracted. The finest scenes in a new novel, the best passages of a poem, a book of travels, or a work of biography, were generally to be found in the Edinburgh Review, and the criticism with which the whole was linked together, or the manner in which the plot was described by the acute and lively critic, rivalled, if it did not excel, the work of the author. The setting was as precious as the jewels. One of the most memorable incidents in the critical and personal history of Jeffrey was his duel with Moore the poet, of which an account has already been presented in the life of the 250 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. latter. We now give more minutely Jeffrey's side of the affair. In this case the sentiment that no man should write with his pen what he is not prepared to defend with his sword, was substantially verified ; for though in the modern duello the instrument of warfare has been changed, the danger has not thereby been lessened. Liter- ary duels, common in France, have always been rare in this country. The effusion of ink sufficed to revenge even the truculent satires of Dryden and the stinging sarcasms of Pope. Dr Johnson laughed at the Drawcansir threats and hostile message of Macpherson, though he seems to have considered duelling a species of self-defence that might be justified on the same grounds as public war. Happily the force of opinion has now abolished the practice. When literary men have been prompted to manifestations of this kind, it will generally be found that the demon of politics was present ; and this, we suspect, was the case in the misunderstanding between Moore and Jeffrey. In the spring of 1806, the former published his Epistles, Odes, and other Poems. The poet enjoyed considerable social and fashionable celebrity. He was supposed to be a boon companion of the Prince of Wales. His poems were dedicated to the Earl of Moira ; one of the epistles was addressed to Viscount Strangford, and others to the Lady Charlotte Rawdon, to Viscount Forbes, the Hon. William Spencer, &c. In all of these really grace- ful and sparkling poetical offerings, democratic America, with its ' piebald polity ' and its ' fustian flag,' was heartily anathematised — French philosophy FRANCIS JEFFREY. 251 and liberty were denounced as unclean things — England was warned to beware of the mob mania — and over every page of the handsome hot-pressed quarto volume was spread an air of courtly fastidious- ness and superiority. All this must have grated on the popular sympathies and Whiggish feelings of the Edinburgh reviewer ; but he had a still more serious ground of offence. Many of the poems were tainted with immorality. Youthful flesh and blood — and particularly Irish flesh and blood — could hardly refrain from resent- ing a charge of mercenary immorality. Moore resorted to the mode then sanctioned as the blind arbiter of quarrels. He sent a challenge to his critic, who happened to be at the time in London, and the parties met at Chalk Farm, as before related. Some wag circulated a report that both pistols were leadless ! Hence the sarcastic allu- sion in Byron's English Bards and Scotch Reviewers, which was afterwards nearly causing a duel between the noble poet and Moore, but ultimately led to their acquaintance and friendship : Health to great Jeffrey ! Can none remember that eventful day, That ever-glorious, almost fatal fray, When Little's leadless pistol met his eye, And Bow Street myrmidons stood laughing by ? This was of course a false representation of what occurred, but it served as a subject of raillery, not the less we may believe, because Moore was known to be sensitive on the subject, and had even taken the trouble to contradict the report in the news- papers. In a letter written a few days after the 252 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. occurrence, addressed to the editor of the Morning Chronicle, Moore vindicated his conduct. 'The quarrel/ he said, ' was not to be considered as literary. Though by no means indifferent to the decrees of criticism, I am aware that they are not to be reversed by an appeal to the pistol. The review, however, which Jeffrey had written appeared to me to contain more personality than criticism ; to impute to me motives which my heart disclaims and detests ; and to assail me altogether much more as a man than as a writer. Conceiving, therefore, that in the present state of manners no gentleman can hold such language to another with impunity, I returned a contradiction to the assertions of Jeffrey in terms too plain to be misunderstood, and the meeting of which the public has heard was the consequence/ The poet then anxiously explains that the pistol which the officer took from him was found to be regularly loaded, though, from some accident in the carriage of the pistols, that of Jeffrey was certainly without a ball ! In this ridiculous affair the public was generally on the side of the critic. It was acknowledged that Moore's muse required to be checked and rebuked, and that though the moral censor might have gone too far, he went in the right direc- tion. There was, however, too much wit, talent, and real worth on both sides for the estrange- ment to continue long. Habits of intimacy com- menced shortly afterwards, and Moore himself became an Edinburgh Reviewer. To the number for September 1814 he contributed a critique on Lord Thurlow's poetry, in which he almost rivalled FRANCIS JEFFREY. 253 the editor in critical severity. In one of the pre- faces to his collected works, Moore has said: 'In the most formidable of all my censors — the great master of the art of criticism in our day — I have found since one of the most cordial of all my friends ; ' and on the occasion of his visiting Scotland in 1825, the poet passed some days with Lord Jeffrey at 'his agreeable retreat, Craigcrook,' where he sang his last new song, Ship Ahoy ! and was called upon to repeat it so often, that 'the upland echoes of Craigcrook ought long to have had its burden by heart.' The famous critique on Lord Byron's Juvenile Poems (January 1808) was still more remarkable in its results than that on Moore. The merciless severity of the attack was intended to crush the minor poet, but it only nerved him for further exertion, and impelled him on in that poetical career which was destined to be so fertile and glorious. Had Byron's first critic not pronounced his poetry to be a dead fiat, which the author could neither get above nor below, and had he not counselled him to abandon poetry, we should never have had that vigorous satire, English Bards and Scotch Reviewers, and might have waited long even for Childe Harold. There was some danger at this period that Byron would sink into the idle dissi- pation and frivolity of a town life; and from such a descent the reviewer called him, though with no friendly voice, and added his name to the proud roll of our national poets. Byron's diaries and letters afford evidence that he considered the critique in the Edinburgh Review to be the work of Lord 254 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. Brougham. Jeffrey afterwards made amends to the noble poet's feelings by his criticism on his greater works. If Sir Walter Scott's critiques on Byron in the Quarterly Review be compared with those of Jeffrey in the Edinburgh, it will be seen that, beautiful as the former are in style and spirit — approaching almost to feminine tenderness, and overflowing with illustration — the professional critic has greatly the advantage in force, discrimination, and eloquence. The early crudities of his poetical faith and opinions had been mellowed down by time and reflection; the range of his poetical emotion was extended; and in the poetry of Byron he had subjects worthy of all his powers and sensibilities. The poet felt the generosity of his critic. He had heard Jeffrey, he said, most highly commended by those who knew him for things independent of his talents, and he admired him for his liberality towards himself. 'None but a great soul dared hazard it; a little scribbler would have gone on cavilling to the end of the chapter.' In the tenth canto of Don Juan, written at Pisa in 1822 — when all his ' little feuds ' were over, and his brief career was drawing to a close — Byron paid a noble tribute to his former antagonist, blended with rich allusions to Scotland, to auld langsyne, and to his boyish feelings and dreams, as must ever render the passage one of the finest and most interesting episodes in his poetry and his life. As the Beview advanced in public favour, it assumed a bolder tone in politics. The war in Spain ranged the nation into two parties — one, FRANCIS JEFFREY. 255 like Scott, animated with a strong anti-Gallican spirit; and another, like Jeffrey, predicting that we should reap nothing but disaster and disgrace from the struggle. An article by Brougham on the 'French Usurpation in Spain/ being a review of a work by Don Cevallos (1808), seemed to induce a crisis in the affairs of the Review. ' The Tories,' said Jeffrey in a letter to Horner, 'having got a handle, are running us down with all their might, and the ghosts of all the miserables we have slain are rising to join the vengeance. Walter Scott, and William Erskine, and about twenty-five persons of consideration, have forbidden the Review to enter their doors. The Earl of Buchan, I am informed, opened his street-door, and actually kicked it out !' The editor resolved to eschew party politics, and to practise exemplary moderation for the future ; but this could not well be done. The public events were too exciting to be passed over in silence. Brougham and Horner were now in parliament, and connected with the Opposition. The editor him- self was become too conspicuous to preserve an obscure neutrality. Friends required to be sup- ported, and opponents encountered ; and it was almost inevitable that the Review, to keep its ground, and preserve consistency, should become the recognised organ, defender, and exponent of the Whio- party. A cry of infidelity was also raised against the Review, and it was grounded on articles written by Sydney Smith, who had commented in 1807 on Foreign Missions. Durino- all this time Jeffrey was steadily advanc- 256 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. ing in his practice and reputation at the bar. In assiduity he rivalled the dullest plodder; for he took no fee without conscientiously studying the case, and he spared no pains to procure a verdict for his client. His fluency and vivacity, and the constant stream of his illustrations, poured out with the rapidity of a cataract, were sometimes too elevated and recondite for a common jury, but in important criminal trials he was highly effective. In political cases he was the intrepid defender of constitutional freedom. In the trials for sedition between 1817 and 1822 he was ever in the front rank. He also took part in public meetings, con- demning the system of intimidation which was then adopted to repress the evils of discontent ; he spoke at the Fox anniversaries; he wrote for the in- struction of the discontented mechanics ; and on all occasions, when oppression or slavery was to be stigmatised, or toleration and liberty promoted, he was ready with his displays of high eloquence, intermingled with effusions of wit or fancy. We need not dwell on those party conflicts; on the meetings in the Pantheon or county-halls; on the dinners to Hume or Brougham (in the latter case he disappointed his auditory, as if paralysed by the fierce invectives and tremendous power of Brougham) ; or attempt to depict the glowing scenes of rivalry and contention that have hap- pily passed away. In 1816 the institution of the court for the trial of civil cases by jury in Scotland threw a vast accession of business into the hands of Jeffrey. He was engaged in almost every case; his knowledge, acuteness, and subtle ifiiy FRANCIS JEFFREY. 259 argumentation having there an appropriate field for exertion. In the intervals of his busy toils he made occasional excursions to the Highlands or to the English lakes. In 1811 he made a pilgrimage on foot through the wilds of Inverness-shire, and by the parallel roads of Glenroy. In 1815 we find him in France, noting in his journal that Cambrai was famed for 'its cambric, its league, and its Fe'nelon/ He had about this time taken a country-house — his residence of Craigcrook — 'an old turreted mansion, much patched in the whole mass of its structure,' beautifully situated at the foot of Corstorphine Hill, near Edinburgh. His windows looked out upon a wooded hill : he had a good garden, and some fields for rural occupation and pleasure. The charms of this old chateau and summer retreat were enhanced by the presence of a lady who added much to his happiness, and who lived to mourn his loss. In 1811 M. Simond, a French author, his wife, and niece, visited Edinburgh. Jeffrey saw much of them during their stay, and some time after- wards the intercourse was renewed in London. In 1813 Jeffrey followed his visitors to America, and was there married to the young lady, Miss Wilkes, a grand-niece of the celebrated John Wilkes. The following anecdote is related of his Trans- atlantic marriage-journey: 'He met in America a large and brilliant party, who endeavoured to extort political opinions from him. The paltry and unnecessary war between the United States and Great Britain was then in progress, and one 260 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. American statesman, in a very marked manner, asked : " And now, Mr Jeffrey, what is said of the war in Great Britain ? " Jeffrey was determined to mortify the national vanity of the Americans, and he replied : " War — war ? yes, I did hear some talk of it in Liverpool ! " ' A few personal traits and anecdotes may be here given. It was the custom of Jeffrey, when review- ing the works of his friends, to give them the perusal of the proof-sheets before publication. In doing this to Mrs Grant of Laggan, he remarked : ' I let them know what I say of them before they are led out to execution. When I take up my review- ing pen, I consider myself as entering the temple of truth, and bound to say what I think.' He courageously sent the proof-sheets of his critique on Marmion to Scott, having to dine with the poet the same day. Scott preserved his equanimity, as may be seen from the detail in Lockhart's Life ; but Mrs Scott could not help saying in her broken English, when her guest was departing : ' Well, good night, Mr Jeffrey ; dey tell me you have abused Scott in de Review, and I hope Mr Constable has paid you well for writing it.' Willison, the early printer of the Review, in sending one of the proofs to the editor, wrote on the margin that 'there appeared to be some obscurity in it.' The sheet was returned with this reply : ' Mr J. sees no obscurity here, except such as arises from the great number of commas, which Mr W. seems to keep in a pepper-box beside him for the purpose of dusting all his proofs with.' Jeffrey was somewhat peculiar in the punctuation FRANCIS JEFFREY. 261 of his writings, as in his handwriting, which was wretched. It has been confidently stated that Jeffrey sent William Hazlitt a sum of £50, to relieve him from difficulty in his last illness. This generosity is alluded to in the Life of Charles Lamb. William M'Gavin, a Glasgow merchant, and author of a series of letters entitled The Protestant, was tried and convicted for a libel on a Catholic priest at Glasgow. Jeffrey was retained for the pursuer, and brought his eloquence to bear with a very lively effect on M'Gavin. The latter sat, in mute astonishment, gazing on Jeffrey, while, minute after minute, there rolled forth periods of the fiercest invective against himself. At length the mortified ' Protestant ' took out his watch, and calculated how many words Jeffrey spoke in a minute. He afterwards published that, having compared Johnson's Dictionary with Jeffrey's speech, he found that the voluble gentleman had in two hours spoken the English language three times over ! As so much has been said about Jeffrey and the Lake Poets, we may mention that the critic had little personal intercourse with them. He had met Southey in Edinburgh and Keswick, and Coleridge once only at Keswick. Wordsworth and his critical antagonist had one meeting. This was in June 1828, at an evening party in the house of Sir James Mackintosh in London. It was at his own request that the critic was introduced to the poet by their courteous and benevolent host. The exuberant fancy and imagery scattered throughout Jeffrey's essays and speeches, and which 262 LITERAEY CELEBRITIES. were constantly sparkling up like a perennial fountain in his conversation, led many to believe that nature had marked him out for a poet, and that, as in the cases of Lord Mansfield and Sir William Blackstone, the goddess Themis, so jealous of her rights, had defrauded the Muses. Rarely have rhetoricians had such command of the elements of poetry as was possessed by Jeffrey. Oh ! many are the poets that are sown By nature ; men endowed with highest gifts, The vision and the faculty divine, Yet wanting the accomplishment of verse. The Excursion. This is the declaration of a high authority, but of one who would not perhaps have included the brilliant reviewer among his own silent brethren. To epic or tragic power, indeed, Jeffrey could have made no approach : the divine afflatus was want- ing. But in that middle class of poetry of which Horace was the great master and exemplar — uniting knowledge of the world and shrewd observation with pictures of manners, just senti- ment, wit, and elegance — Jeffrey, we think, might have attained to a respectable rank. We do not know that he ever attempted translation. The following stanzas from his pen appeared in one of the Annuals in the year 1829, entitled Verses inscribed in a Lady's Album. They belong to the higher class of vers-de-socie'te : Why write my name 'midst songs and flowers To meet the eye of lady gay ? I have no voice for lady's bowers, For page like this no fitting lay. FRANCIS JEFFREY. 263 Yet though my heart no more must bound At witching call of sprightly joys, Mine is the brow that never frowned On laughing lips or sparkling eyes. No, though behind me now is closed The youthful Paradise of Love, Yet I can bless, with soul composed, The lingerers in that happy grove. Take, then, fair girls, my blessing take, Where'er amid its charms you roam, Or where, by western hill or lake, You brighten a serener home. And while the youthful lover's name Here with the sister beauty's blends, Laugh not to scorn the humbler aim That to the list would add a friend's. There is more poetry in the following specimen of his prose. In treating of the beauty of land- scapes, as connected with the law of association, in a critique on Alison's Essay on Taste (1811), Jeffrey draws this parallel : 'Take, for instance, the case of a common English landscape — green meadows, with fat cattle — canals or navigable rivers — well-fenced, well- cultivated fields — neat, clean, scattered cottages — humble antique church, with churchyard elms, and crossing hedgerows — all seen under bright skies, and in good weather : there is much beauty, as every one will acknowledge, in such a scene. But in what does the beauty consist? Not certainly in the mere mixture of colours and forms — for colours more pleasing, and lines more graceful (according to any theory of grace that may be preferred), might be spread upon a board, or a 264 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. painter's palette, without engaging the eye to a second glance, or raising the least emotion in the mind — but in the picture of human happiness that is presented to our imaginations and affections — in the visible and unequivocal signs of comfort, and cheerful and peaceful enjoyment — and of that secure and successful industry that insures its con- tinuance — and of the piety by which it is exalted — and of the simplicity by which it is contrasted with the guilt and the fever of a city life — in the images of health and temperance and plenty which it exhibits to every eye — and in the glimpses which it affords to warmer imaginations, of those primitive or fabulous times when man was un- corrupted by luxury and ambition, and of those humble retreats in which we still delight to imagine that love and philosophy may find an unpolluted asylum. At all events, however, it is human feeling that excites our sympathy, and forms the object of our emotions. It is man, and man alone, that we see in the beauties of the earth which he inhabits ; or, if a more sensi- tive and extended sympathy connect us with the lower families of animated nature, and make us rejoice with the lambs that bleat on the uplands, or the cattle that ruminate in the valley, or even with the living plants that drink the bright sun and the balmy air beside them, it is still the idea of enjoyment — of feelings that animate the existence of sentient beings — that calls forth all our emotions, and is the parent of all the beauty with which we proceed to invest the inanimate creation around us. FRANCIS JEFFREY. 265 'Instead of this quiet and tame English land- scape, let us now take a Welsh or a Highland scene, and see whether its beauties will admit of being explained on the same principle. Here we shall have lofty mountains, and rocky and lonely recesses — tufted woods hung over precipices — lakes inter- sected with castled promontories — ample solitudes of unploughed and untrodden valleys — nameless and gigantic ruins — and mountain echoes repeating the scream of the eagle and the roar of the cataract. This, too, is beautiful ; and to those who can inter- pret the language it speaks, far more beautiful than the prosperous scene with which we have contrasted it. Yet lonely as it is, it is to the recollection of man and of human feelings that its beauty also is owing. The mere forms and colours that com- pose its visible appearance are no more capable of exciting any emotion in the mind than the forms and colours of a Turkey carpet. 'It is sympathy with the present or the past, or the imaginary inhabitants of such a region, that alone gives it either interest or beauty; and the delight of those who behold it will always be found to be in exact proportion to the force of their imaginations and the warmth of their social affec- tions. The leading impressions here are those of romantic seclusion and primeval simplicity; lovers sequestered in these blissful solitudes, "from towns and toils remote ; " and rustic poets and philosophers communing with nature, at a distance from the low pursuits and selfish malignity of ordinary mortals; then there is the sublime impression of the Mighty Power which piled the massive cliffs 266 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. upon one another, and rent the mountains asunder, and scattered their giant fragments at their base — and all the images connected with the monuments of ancient magnificence and extinguished hostility — the feuds, and the combats, and the triumphs of its wild and primitive inhabitants, contrasted with the stillness and desolation of the scenes where they lie interred — and the romantic ideas attached to their ancient traditions and the peculiarities of their present life — their wild and enthusiastic poetry — their gloomy superstitions — their attachment to their chiefs — the dangers, and the hardships, and enjoyments of their lonely huntings and fishings — their pastoral sheilings on the mountains in summer — and the tales and the sports that amuse the little groups that are frozen into their vast and trackless valleys in the winter. Add to all this the traces of vast and obscure antiquity that are impressed on the language and the habits of the people, and on the cliffs and caves, and gulfy torrents of the land — and the solemn and touching reflection per- petually recurring of the weakness and insignificance of perishable man, whose generations thus pass away into oblivion with all their toils and ambition, while nature holds on her unvarying course, and pours out her streams, and renews her forests, with undecaying activity, regardless of the fate of her proud and perishable sovereign.' In 1820 Jeffrey was elected Lord Rector of the university of Glasgow. The principle of election for this high academical distinction is of a popular character. By the original statutes, dated so far back as 1450, the suffrage is vested in the whole FRANCIS JEFFREY. 267 of the matriculated students, with whom are joined the dean and principal professors. In the earlier periods of our history, before civil rights were extended and denned, the rector possessed vast powers civil and criminal. His court was almost as absolute as the Star Chamber. The duties and powers of the office are now, however, almost nominal. The appointment is an honorary distinc- tion, and is generally bestowed on some eminent public character with whose political sentiments, genius, or learning, the majority of the students sympathise. Burke filled the office in the year 1784: Adam Smith was installed in 1787. At a later date the names of Sir James Mackintosh, Brougham, Campbell, Peel, and Macaulay, shed honour on the office of Lord Bector, and on the choice of the young students. Jeffrey was elected in a time of consider- able excitement by an overwhelming majority, and his appointment was a graceful tribute to his talents and political consistency, rendered the more appro- priate by his having studied at Glasgow University. He delivered his inaugural address on Thursday, December 28, and spoke warmly of the grateful and nattering honour conferred upon him. ' It was here,' he said, ' that, now more than thirty years ago, I received the earliest and by far the most valuable part of my academical education, and first imbibed that relish and veneration for letters which has cheered and directed the whole course of my after-life ; and to which, amidst all the distractions of rather too busy an existence, I have never failed to return with fresh and unabated enjoyment. Nor is it merely by those distant and 268 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. pleasing recollections — by the touching retrospect of those scenes of guiltless ambition and youthful delight, when everything around and before me was bright with novelty and hope, that this place, and all the images it recalls, are at this moment endeared to my heart. Though I have been able, I fear, to do but little to honour this early nurse of my studies since I was first separated from her bosom, I will yet presume to say that I have been, during all that interval, an affectionate and not an inattentive son. For the whole of that period I have watched over her progress, and gloried in her fame ; and at your literary Olympics, where your prizes are distributed, and the mature swarm annually cast off to ply its busy task in the wider circuit of the world, I have generally been found a fond and eager spectator of that youthful prowess in which I had ceased to be a sharer, and a delighted chronicler of that excellence which never ceased to be supplied. And thus the tie which originally bound me to the place was never allowed to be broken ; and when called to the high office which I this day assume, I felt that I could not be considered as a stranger, even by the youngest portion of the society over which I was to pre- side/ Jeffrey, according to the usual custom, was re- elected Lord Rector at the expiration of his first year of office. He delivered a second inaugural address on the 3d of January 1822, in which he announced that he had determined to give a prize, ' to be awarded by the young men themselves, to the individuals who shall excel in recitation and FRANCIS JEFFREY. 269 declamation — a science in the study and knowledge of which we are so much behind our southern neighbours : the prize, a gold medal, to be confined to the two classes where such an excitement seems more particularly called for — the Greek and Latin classes — to each of which it will be given alternately, commencing with the Greek.' By a subsequent arrangement on the part of the Lord Rector, this prize was confined to the most distinguished student in the Greek class, the award to be made by the votes of his fellow-students. In order to place the medal on a permanent footing, the generous donor, in 1849, remitted to the college factor the sum of £120, of which ten guineas were to be applied in procuring two medal dies, the remainder to be invested by the faculty for the purpose of 'pro- viding and engraving annually, in all time coming, a gold medal, of such value as can be obtained for the amount of the yearly interest.' Jeffrey received a notable addition to his staff of contributors in 1827. Thomas Carlyle had married and was settled at Comely Bank, a northern suburb of Edinburgh, and was engaged in miscel- laneous literary work, chiefly translations from the German. Some years before, he had volunteered an article to the Edinburgh Review, which had been neither acknowledged nor returned. He hesitated before making another advance, when an oppor- tunity occurred in the shape of a letter of introduc- tion from Procter, the poet. Carlyle called on Jeffrey at his George Street residence, presented his introduction, and had a successful conversation with him; the latter opened the pages of the 270 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. Edinburgh Review to Carlyle, who contributed to it his famous essay on Burns in 1828, and various papers on German literature. Jeffrey called on the Carlyles at Comely Bank, and the intimacy in- creased ; he even visited them in their rural retreat at Craigenputtock. But his interest and kindness did not end here, for he acted as the firm friend and prudent adviser of Carlyle when comparatively unknown, and at one time proffered him an annuity. In 1829 Jeffrey was chosen Dean of the Faculty of Advocates, an honour unanimously conferred upon him by his brethren of the bar, and which was justly regarded not only as a token of personal confidence and respect, but as an unequivocal recog- nition of his having reached the summit of his profession as an advocate. On his election to this office he resigned the editorship of the Edin- burgh Review into the hands of Mr Macvey Napier. He still, however, took a lively interest in its management, and was consulted by his successor whenever any difficulty occurred. The year 1830 brought Jeffrey prominently into public life. It was truly an annus mirabilis. We had the revolution in France agitating all Europe, and the scarcely less decided revolution in England, which began with the overthrow of the Duke of Wellington's administration (considered as impreg- nable as the lines of Torres Vedras), and the acces- sion of the Whig party to power. Jeffrey was now to reap the honours of the well-fought field, and to receive the plaudits of the nation as one FEANCIS JEFFEEY. 271 of the victors. With the French success he cordially sympathised, and he joined with his fellow-citizens in publicly commemorating the valour, moderation, and heroism of the people of France. A few months afterwards, he was appointed Lord Advocate in the administration of Earl Grey. This office must always be one of high responsibility, as including the functions of crown lawyer and public prosecutor, and the exercise of political influence and patron- age. The Lord Advocate is the minister for Scot- land. The duties of the appointment were also rendered more arduous and delicate at this time, when a party had acceded to power on popular principles, and pledged to extensive reforms. To charm the popular voice into submission and contentment after a period of such unbounded excite- ment and expectation, required more energy and prudence than were ' necessary at first to secure success. Jeffrey said he accepted office with sincere reluctance; for he had to leave the retirement of private life, in which he had his chief solace and delight. He did not covet the office; it had come to him from no solicitation on his part, but from the circumstance that the new government formed by the crown professed all the most important principles it had been the study of his life to assert and maintain. It was necessary that the Lord Advocate should have a seat in parliament. He became a candidate for the representation of the district of burghs including Perth, Dundee, St Andrews, Cupar, and Forfar, for so many important towns were then linked together in unnatural union to return one member to parliament! The three 272 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. first mentioned voted for the Lord Advocate ; the last two for his opponent, Captain Ogilvy of the ' noble House of Airly ; ' and as Forfar was the returning burgh, and had a casting vote, both candidates claimed to be elected. Jeffrey was declared the sitting member, and Captain Ogilvy petitioned against his return. Jeffrey took his seat in the House of Commons on the opening of parliament in February 1831. He had thus an opportunity of aiding his friends in the great debate on the second reading of the Reform Bill, which after a four-nights' discussion, was carried on the 2 2d of March. Four days after- wards, the election committee decided in favour of Captain Ogilvy. The Lord Advocate, however, found refuge in the small borough of Malton in Yorkshire, where the influence of Earl Fitzwilliam predominated. Sir James Scarlett, who had opposed the Reform Bill, retired ; and Jeffrey succeeded him as member for Malton on the 12th of April. In less than a fortnight the House of Lords had rejected the Reform Bill, and parliament was dis- solved. Jeffrey then solicited the suffrages of his native city, and no less than 17,400 of the inhabit- ants petitioned the elective body, the town-council, in his favour. He was, however, destined to be defeated by the narrow majority of three — fourteen members of council voting for him, and seventeen for his opponent, Mr R. A. Dundas. So indignant were the populace at the rejection of their favourite candidate, that serious riots took place, and the Lord Provost had to be escorted home by a party of dragoons. FRANCIS JEFFREY. 273 The Lord Advocate was again returned — and on a valid election — for the Forfar burghs, his seat in Malton being at the same time kept open till his election was secured. He again co-operated in carrying the Reform Bill through the Commons. The peers gave way, the bill became law ; and under the new constituency, Jeffrey and his friend Mr Abercrombie (afterwards Lord Dunfermline) were almost unanimously elected the representatives for the city of Edinburgh. The Lord Advocate retained his seat until May 1834, when he gladly exchanged the turmoil of party politics for the duties of a judge. He was appointed to the bench on the retirement of an aged judge, Lord Craigie; his parliamentary career having thus extended over a period of three years and three months. The impression was universal that Jeffrey had failed in parliament. The case of Erskine was cited as a parallel one, and we were reminded of the saying, that the floor of the House of Commons was strewed with the wreck of eminent lawyers' reputations. All such broad unqualified statements must be received with caution. With the examples of Mansfield and Wedderburn, of Thurlow, Scarlett, and Brougham, before us, it is idle to say that eminent lawyers do not succeed in the House of Commons. Erskine's failure was only comparative. He could not rival Pitt, or Fox, or Sheridan; and he did not apply himself sedulously to cultivate the arts necessary to success in debate. His previous reputation as a forensic orator was so great, that scarcely any appearance could have realised the expectations formed by his friends. R 274 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. Jeffrey laboured under the same disadvantage. His fame was already high — filled to the brim. He had to contend not only with practised rivals, who waited for his halting, but with the pre- possessions and hopes created by his own genius. He made one brilliant speech in support of the Reform Bill — one of the best which the discussion called forth; but he made no attempt to shine as a debater, and this is the most attractive and valuable accomplishment in a popular assembly. A clever retort or sarcasm, a personal sally, or a strain of witty exaggeration directed against an opponent, will always meet with a better reception in the House of Commons than a speech which deals with the first principles of a question, though abounding in the finest analysis or illustration, and appealing to history and reason. A familiarity with the forms and personnel of the house, a knowledge of parties, and a certain style of masculine plainness and vigour, are also requisite ; and these can rarely be acquired except by early practice and long perseverance. A gentleman who sat with the Lord Advocate in parliament, and was a strenuous supporter of his principles, wrote as follows on the impression made on the House by his distinguished friend : 'That Jeffrey failed in securing the attention of the House of Commons in a manner commensurate with his extraordinary genius, and his talents as a public speaker in other respects, is, I believe, certain. As to the causes of his being imperfectly listened to, I may begin by saying that his voice was far from clear and distinct, and that he was subject FRANCIS JEFFREY. 275 to a tendency to bronchitis. His utterance was also extremely rapid. His pronunciation, though not broad, was not easily followed by an English ear. The shape in which he clothed his thoughts was not very intelligible to an English audience. There was a spontaneous flow of imagery in his ordinary language which it was not easy for him to restrain. There was a good deal of meta- physical theory, and a considerable sprinkling of technical phraseology, which, though quite familiar to his audiences in Edinburgh, was very imperfectly understood in the House of Commons. Besides all this, he did not enter the House till on the borders of sixty, at which no eminent speaker ever com- menced his career.' These physical impediments could never have been wholly got over; but at this time Jeffrey laboured under severe indisposition and debility, which disqualified him for active exertion. He was often confined to his house, or could only exchange it for the purer air of the country, free from the stir and noise of the Great Babel. While looking after the Scots Reform Bill, too, he suffered much. If we glance at the few and imperfectly reported speeches delivered by the Lord Advocate in the debates on the Reform Bill, we shall find no trace of mental weakness, or any cause of parlia- mentary failure. How few men in the House could have struck off the following brief and philosophical summary ! ' It could not be denied that if they looked back to the career of glory which England had run during the reigns of the Tudors and Stuarts, they 276 LITEEAEY CELEBRITIES. found that England during those periods held a high rank among nations for wealth and splendour, and even then was regarded by other nations as the country where the principles of liberty were best understood and practised. But could it be argued that because England held that rank among the nations during the reigns of the Tudors and Stuarts, the country was now to be satisfied with the institutions of those days ? Why, this was an argument contrary to all history ; and, independent of history, it was contrary to all principle. In infant states, the first things in order were wealth and prosperity, and these might exist for a short time without either liberal institutions or freedom : but the fruit of wealth and prosperity was necessarily freedom. The first stage of what might be called civilised society was generally that in which a munificent and prudent tyrant ruled the destinies of a state, and encouraged those persons described in the book of Ecclesiasticus, as men who wrought with their own hands, and were cunning in works of wood, and brass, and iron. When wealth increased, liberty followed; for liberty was the daughter, not the mother, of wealth. This was the case with the Italian republics, with the free towns of Germany, with the ancient state of Corinth, and other Grecian republics ; and, latterly, with the towns and corporations of England. Works of the utmost splendour and genius rendered England as proud a name then as it had been since ; but was that any reason that when society became enlarged, and the various links of it became more multiplied, the basis of the constitution should not be widened, FRANCIS JEFFREY. 277 and room be found for the multiplied children of freedom ?' He argued that the greatest of all dangers was, that the really distressed or aggrieved in the country- should be led to tolerate doctrines of anarchy in despair of legitimate redress. 'If the reasonably discontented were propitiated and satisfied, would they not feel themselves the stronger, and be the better able to deal with the unreasonable ? He wanted, amid the political chaos, to establish a firmament which should separate the waters above from the infernal. Stygian below.' In advocating the Scots Reform Bill, which it was his official duty to prepare and superintend in its progress through the House, Jeffrey gave a lucid and effective exposition of the anomalous and illusory system of representation which then pre- vailed. We may quote his account of Bute as a happy and remarkable illustration : 'All the voters in the county of Bute were twenty-one, and it was ludicrous to state that twenty out of those twenty-one had no property whatever in that county; so that in that county there was only a single voter connected with it by property, who, like a sovereign, was uncontrolled within it. At one election there, within the memory of man, when the day of election came, only one person qualified to vote attended; and that person was the sheriff. He read the writ to the meeting as sheriff. Then he constituted the meeting. Then, having constituted the meeting, he called over the names on the roll. Then he answered to the names himself. Then he put the vote for a preses to 278 literary celebrities. the meeting ; he elected himself preses ; he read over the minutes of the last meeting; he moved that they should be confirmed ; he confirmed them himself ; and, last of all, he put the representation to the vote ; and being himself the whole meeting, made a unanimous return.' If Jeffrey retired from parliament without one additional leaf of laurel — harassed with party tactics, and worn out with late divisions — he retired also without one stain on his honesty or disinterestedness as a politician. He was welcomed to the Supreme Court by all the legal profession and by the public; for all had confidence in his learning, his discernment, and his industry. He earned a high reputation as a judge. Suitors were anxious that their cases should be decided by him. He devoted the most careful consideration to every question that came before him ; consulting autho- rities and maturing his opinions in private, and stating fully in court, with his usual candour and precision, the various grounds of his decisions. His quickness in detecting sophistry and error some- times led him to interrupt the counsel with signifi- cant and puzzling questions ; and there was at times an over-solicitude and over-refinement in his mode of handling a case ; partly arising from his conscientious sense of duty, and partly from -his intellectual habits of subtle investigation and nice inquiry. This, however, was counteracted by the alacrity with which he could set to any amount of labour, and his aversion to the accumulation of arrears. No better monument to his legal skill FRANCIS JEFFREY. 279 and perseverance need be given than the records of cases decided in the Court of Session during his term of office. His judicial labours were relieved by his unabated love of literature. He contributed a few articles to the Edinburgh Review, including critiques on the Lives of Mackintosh and Wilberforce; and at length he consented to the publication of a selection from the whole of his contributions, similar collec- tions having been made and published with great success from the writings of Macaulay and Sydney Smith. Lord Jeffrey's work appeared in 1844, in four volumes, being only about a third of what he had actually written for the Review. The volumes were accompanied by a graceful, half- apologetic preface, and by explanatory notes couched in a gentle and subdued spirit. All traces of the keen invective and caustic irony had disappeared. The 'lord of the unerring bow' had sheathed his arrows. There was a full admission of the errors and indiscretions of the earlier numbers of the Review, and of its 'excesses both of party zeal, overweening confidence, and intemperate blame.' Lord Jeffrey acknowledged that he had said 'petulant and provoking things' of Southey, and that he had in many places spoken 'rather too bitterly and confidently of the faults' of Words- worth's poetry. But in these cases, though regret- ting the manner of his strictures, he still adhered substantially to the judgments he had given. Having acknowledged his faults, he intimates his claim to the merit of having more uniformly and earnestly than any preceding critic made the moral 280 LITERAEY CELEBRITIES. tendencies of the works under consideration a lead- ing subject of discussion. The praise to which he aspired was, ' that of having constantly endeavoured to combine ethical precepts with literary criticism, and earnestly sought to impress his readers with a sense both of the close connection between sound intellectual attainments and the higher elements of duty and enjoyment, and of the just and ultimate subordination of the former to the latter.' The great critic realised all he aspired to, and much more. He made good his claim to 'titles manifold.' His four volumes, though not contain- ing all his most original or striking essays, are a repertory of sound and valuable maxims, fine conceptions, and correct definitions. The actual writings, however, afford no just criterion of the benefits which Jeffrey conferred upon his country. Who can calculate the impulse which he gave to thought and opinion, to the whole current of our literature, to correct principles of taste and reason- ing, to enlarged views of government, of public duty, and private morality ! Much that is valuable and instrumental in periodical writing perishes in their use. The arguments necessary to help on any great cause become to a certain extent super- fluous and antiquated when that cause is won, as elementary dissertations on law or morals cease to interest in an advanced state of society. During his twenty-six years of active duty as editor and reviewer, Jeffrey had stored the public mind with principles and opinions which we have seen reduced to practice, and which no party would now dispute, but which were violently assailed FRANCIS JEFFREY. 281 when presented in the pages of the Edinburgh Review. To appreciate him aright, we must go back to the times in which he wrote, when literary- criticism was low and servile, and political independ- ence a rare and dangerous quality — when he had to contend with discouragements on every hand, and to inspire or cherish the taste and feelings of which we now reap the advantages. Some of the reviews in his collected works devoted entirely to political questions — to Ireland, the nature of our relations with America, the state of parties in England, and the subjects of parliamentary reform and criminal jurisprudence — are solid and valuable constitutional treatises. He not merely lightens up his subject — he reasons closely on it, and is logical as well as brilliant. He loved to play with metaphysical abstractions ; and this, which was one of his early triumphs, now impedes instead of advancing his popularity. He was just in time to catch the last gleams of metaphysical science from Eeid, Stewart, and Alison ; but the 'shadowy tribes of mind' retreated before the certain light of physical science, and the delineation of human passions and manners. The vivacity and ability with which Jeffrey could expound these mental theories astonished his con- temporaries, and certainly have never been exceeded. He had an exhaustless armoury of language of all descriptions, to suit every shade of meaning, and he was always as definite and exact as he was copious and animated. Yet the adventurous critic was very sceptical as to the utility of meta- physical speculations. 282 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. Instead of endeavouring to bring out a theory of his own, he set himself to investigate critically all the theories most prevalent in his day — to dis- entangle them from what he deemed doubtful and obscure, and to exhibit within the smallest possible compass what is satisfactory to our reason, or what bears in any degree on practical purposes. Thus he considers the principle of veracity and the principle of credulity, which Reid held to be original prin- ciples in human nature, to be merely excrescences on that philosopher's system, and unnecessary to carry out his views. He also cut off from Alison's theory of association the notion of long trains of ideas and sensations, which he held to be equally superfluous. Jeffrey's exposition of Alison's theory is one of his most elaborate and complete meta- physical dissertations, and it is enriched with some of his most picturesque and beautiful writing. He enlarged the article, and reprinted it as an essay on Beauty in the Encyclopaedia Britannica. He evidently regarded it as the corner-stone of his fame. His great superiority consists in the versatility of his powers, and the perfect command he had over his faculties and acquirements. There was scarcely a region of the intellectual world that he had not explored, yet his natural endowments were greater than his acquisitions. The demands of a laborious profession precluded any profound knowledge in the sciences or abstruser branches of learning. He was more a man of the world than an erudite scholar — more of a popular orator and lawyer than an author; yet how few have been able to rival FRANCIS JEFFREY. 283 him in mental philosophy or polite literature ! His perceptions were so quick as to seem intuitive, and his sensibilities so keen as to include every species of emotion. No poet could have a greater admira- tion of the beauties of external nature, yet his fertile imagination was but the handmaid of his clear and powerful understanding. His reasons and arguments on any subject were as strong and distinct as his illustrations were rich and fanciful. When these were aided by the fire of his eye, the animated expression of his countenance, and that flow of language which seemed as if it were never to cease running and sparkling, and which never made one abrupt or half -formed sentence, the impression made by his genius and acquirements on all minds of the slightest susceptibility was indescribable. Mrs Hemans compared the effect of his conversation to drinking champagne. But Jeffrey aimed at higher things than these. Both by his voice and his pen he sought to make men better, and wiser, and happier. He had a deep sympathy with his kind in all its joys and sorrows — a love of whatever was fair and good, and a scorn of whatever was base, or mean, or hypocritical. His candour was as trans- parent as his truth. His highest flights as an orator or writer were connected with the best feelings and interests of humanity. Jeffrey was an admirable letter-writer, and the following epistle to a grandchild, from Craigcrook, 20th June 1848, shows his character in an amiable light, and how he could unbend from severer studies and duties: 'My sonsy Nancy !— I love you very much, and think very often of your dimples, and 284 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. your pimples ; and your funny little plays, and all your pretty ways ; and I send you my blessing, and wish I were kissing, your sweet rosy lips, or your fat finger tips ; and that you were here, so that I could hear, your stammering words, from a mouthful of curds; and a great purple tongue (as broad as it's long) ; and see your round eyes, open wide with surprise, and your wondering look, to find yourself at Craigcrook ! To-morrow is Maggie's birthday, and we have built up a great bonfire in honour of it; and Maggie Rutherfurd (do you remember her at all ? ) is coming out to dance round it ; and all the servants are to drink her health, and wish her many happy days with you and Frankie ; and all the mammys and pappys, whether grand or not grand. We are very glad to hear that she and you love each other so well, and are happy in making each other happy ; and that you do not forget dear Tarley or Frankie, when they are out of sight, nor granny either — or even old granny pa, who is in most danger of being forgotten, he thinks. We have had showery weather here, but the garden is full of flowers ; and Frankie has a new wheelbarrow, and does a great deal of work, and some mischief now and then. All the dogs are very well ; and Foxey is mine, and Froggy is Tarley 's, and Frankie has taken up with great white Neddy — so that nothing- is left for granny but old barking Jacky and Dover when the carriage comes. The donkey sends his compliments to you, and maintains that you are a cousin of his ! or a near relation at all events. He wishes, too, that you and Maggie would come, for he thinks that you will not be so heavy on his back as FRANCIS JEFFREY. 285 Tarley and Maggie Rutherfurd, who now ride him without mercy Grannie and I [are] taking care of j Frankie, and he is now hammering very busily at a corner of the carpet, which he says does not lie flat. He is very good, and really too pretty for ^a boy, though I think his two eyebrows are growing into one — stretching and meeting each other above his nose ! But he has not near so many freckles as Tarley — who has a very fine crop of them — which she and I encourage as much as we can. I hope you and Maggie will lay in a stock of them, as I think no little girl can be pretty without them in summer. Our pea-hens are suspected of having young families in some hidden place, for though they pay us short visits now and then, we see them but seldom, and always alone. If you and Maggie were here with your sharp eyes, we think you might find out their secret, and introduce us to a nice new family of young peas. The old papa cock, in the meantime, says he knows nothing about them, and does not care a farthing ! We envy you your young peas of another kind, for we have none yet, nor any asparagus either, and hope you will bring some down to us in your lap. Tarley sends her love, and I send mine to you all ; though I shall think most of Maggie to-morrow morning, and of you when your birth morning comes. "When is that, do you know ? It is never dark now here, and we might all go to bed without candles. And so bless you ever and ever, my dear dimply pussie — Your very loving Grandpa.' At a late period of his life Lord Jeffrey was called upon, in his judicial capacity, to deliver judgment in 286 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. a case connected with the political reformers, Muir, Palmer, and Gerald. It was proposed in the year 1845 to erect a monument to their memory, but the scheme was objected to chiefly on political grounds. The Court of Session, by a majority of its body, overruled the objection, Lord Jeffrey concurring. 'The thoughts/ he said, 'which such a monument should suggest, even to those most opposed to the views and opinions of its founders, are naturally of a solemn and sobering character. And if, in some, they may still be too much mixed up with feelings of anger at supposed injustice, and in others of unmerciful reprobation of offences, of which the mischief and the penalties have been long ago con- summated, I can only say that the blame will be with those who continue, on either side, to cherish sentiments so uncharitable ; and that, if there be any place where the influences of the scene in which they are suggested are likely to soften them down to a more humane and indulgent standard, it is when that scene is laid where the wicked cease from troubling, and the weary rest; and where every- thing should remind us of our own frail mortality and of that awful Seat of Judgment before which none of us can hope to be justified — except through mercy.' This solemn and touching admonition may prepare us for the , fast-approaching sequel of our narrative. Lord Jeffrey's health had been shaken by several severe attacks. His cheerfulness and clearness of intellect, however, were undiminished. He scarcely seemed old even at seventy-six. His evening parties at Craigcrook, or at his house in Moray Place, were FEANCIS JEFFKEY. 287 the special delight of his friends; his acts of generosity and charity and unaffected kindness were still more numerous. Kecent circumstances had revived^ his interest in the Edinburgh Review. His only child, a daughter, was married to Mr Empson, professor of law in the East India College at Haileybury; and in 1847, on the death of Mr Macvey Napier, Mr Empson succeeded to the editor- ship of that journal from which his illustrious relative had derived such solid and lasting honours. Lord Jeffrey might now be seen in his leisure hours turning over the leaves of a critique destined for publication, and perhaps suggesting some golden thought or happy illustration to be set like a ' coigne of vantage ' in the text. He was so engaged within one week of his death ! Within four days of that event he sat in court, not having missed a day during the season ; and one of his last writings was a letter, full of tenderness, addressed to the widow of his early friend, Sydney Smith, who had sent him a printed copy of the Lectures on Moral Philo- sophy delivered by Smith so far back as 1806. His early associates and occupations — the names and the duties so long familiar — were thus vividly before him at the last ! The closing hours were linked in beautiful sequency and uniformity with the morn- ing splendour. On returning from the court on Tuesday, January 22, 1850, Lord Jeffrey had a slight accession of cold, which brought on his constitutional complaint, bronchitis ; fever followed, and at six o'clock on Saturday afternoon, while his medical attendant was in the act of feeling his pulse, life became extinct. His remains were interred in the 288 LITERARY CELEBRITIES. Dean Cemetery, without any funereal pomp, as was his own desire, but mourned deeply and widely with no common sorrow. He had lived and died among his own people ; and his native country, amidst her grief, rejoiced in his fame. More extended information about the subject of our notice will be found in the Life of Lord Jeffrey, by his friend Lord Cockburn ; in the Selected Corre- spondence of Macvey Napier; in Carlyle's Reminis- cences; and in Froude's Life of Thomas Carlyle. There is also a good deal that is interesting about Lord Jeffrey in Trevelyan's Life and Letters of Lord Macaulay. THE END. Edinburgh : Printed by W. & R. Chambers. BOOKS PUBLISHED BY w. & R GHAMBEES SUITABLE FOK $xz8znt&tion8, ^txzzs, nnb ^xft-books. 47 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON; AND EDINBURGH. March 1890. i - ! BOOKS PUBLISHED BY chambers's Encyclopedia A DICTIONARY OF UNIVERSAL KNOWLEDGE, WITH MAPS AND WOOD-ENGRAVINGS. In 10 Vols. Imperial 8vo. ENTIRELY NEW EDITION. VOLS. I. II. III. and IV. are now ready. Price 10s. each, cloth ; 15s. each, half -morocco. Times — ' The second and third volumes are marked by all the good qualities that characterised the first, there is the same enterprise in securing specialists as contributors, and the same accuracy, clearness, competency, and conciseness in the treatment of the articles ; the illustrations and maps are numerous and good.' Daily Telegraph — 'The advent of a new edition, accurate, liberal, and cheap, will be welcomed with a very general approval. ' Literary World — ' The new Encyclopaedia is no mere tasteless compilation, but apart from the fullness and accuracy of its information, it has a distinct literary value of its own.' Pall Mall Gazette — ' For practical utility these volumes could hardly be exceeded.' W. & R. CHAMBERS, 47 Paternoster Row, London; and Edinburgh. W. & K. CHAMBERS. 3 CHAMBERS'S JOURNAL OF POPULAR LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ARTS. Fifth Series. The general features of this Journal are — a cheerful Light Literature, Novels and Stories by eminent writers, articles on Popular Science, Modern Travel, and topics of current interest, without the admixture of controversial matter of any kind. Monthly Parts 7d. and 8d. Yearly Vols 9s. BOOK OF DAYS. A Repertory of Popular Antiquities, Seasonal Phenomena, Folk Lore of the United Kingdom, Anniversary Days of Notable Events, Curious Fugitive and Inedited Pieces, and other Curiosities of Literature, Saints' Days and other Holidays connected with the Church Calendar ; Oddities of Human Life and Character. Elaborately illustrated with Engravings. Edited by Robert Chambers, LL.D. 2 Vols, imperial 8vo, cloth £1, Is. „ ,i half-calf £1, 10s. ii ii half -russia or half -morocco £1, 13s. Times — ' There is, in truth, a rich supply of entertainment in its pages, and it is impossible to turn them over without coming upon some novelty, or something of which we are glad to be reminded. Let the reader get the volumes of Mr Chambers for himself; he must be of a peculiar temperament if he does not find in them lasting sources of pleasure.' INFORMATION FOR THE PEOPLE. Containing Treatises on Science, Philosophy, History, Geography, Literature, all the more important departments of general knowledge. Illustrated by Wood Engravings. 2 Vols, royal 8vo, cloth 16s. i, M half-calf 23s. 4 BOOKS PUBLISHED BY CYCLOPEDIA OF ENGLISH LITERATURE. Being a History, Critical and Biographical, of British Authors, from the Earliest to the Present Times ; with Specimens of their Writings. Edited by Robert Chambers, LL.D. Fourth Edition, revised by Eobert Carruthers, LL.D. Illustrated with Portraits. 2 Vols, royal 8vo, cloth 20s.; half -calf, 27s. This work consists of a chronological series of Extracts from our National Authors, from Anglo-Saxon to recent times, set as it were in a Biographical Literary History. Gratifying proofs of its usefulness have come from various quarters and from numerous readers, who have acknowledged that their love of litera- ture and their veneration for our great Authors, from Chaucer to Tennyson, were first called forth by the Gyclopcedia of English Literature. MISCELLANY OF INSTRUCTIVE AND ENTERTAINING TRACTS. These Tracts comprise Tales, Poetry, Ballads, Remarkable Episodes in History, Papers on Social Economy, Domestic Management, Science, Travels, &c. The articles contain wholesome and attractive reading for Mechanics', Parish, School, and Cottage Libraries. 10 Vols, cloth 20s.; half-calf, 45s. PAPERS FOR THE PEOPLE. This series embraces History, Archeology, Biography, Science, the Industrial and Fine Arts, the leading topics in Social Economy, together with Criticism, Fiction, Personal Narrative, and other branches of Literature — each number containing a distinct subject. 6 Vols, crown 8vo, cloth 18s. POCKET MISCELLANY. This comprises a selection of amusing Stories and Articles of general information, and is excellently adapted as a Literary companion for the Railway, the Fireside, or the Bush. Illustrated with Frontispieces. 12 Vols. 18mo, cloth 18s. W. & ft. CHAMBERS. PICTORIAL BIBLE. With Numerous Notes by John Kitto, D.D., F.S.A. It also contains Notes regarding the discoveries of Mr Layard and others. Illustrated with Steel Engravings, Wood-cuts, and Maps. 4 Vols, royal 8vo, cloth £1, 10s. (i it half -calf, antique £2, 5s. ii ii morocco, gilt edges £3, 6s. ST GILES', EDINBURGH: Church, College, Cathedral, from the earliest times to the present day. By J. Cameron Lees, D.D., LL.D. With drawings by George Reid, U.S.A., etched by Durand, Paris; and also Illustrations by Sir Noel Paton, Sir W. Fettes-Doitglas, &c. Demy quarto, Roxburghe binding 25s. GALLERY OF NATURE. A Pictorial and Descriptive Tour through Creation. By the Rev. Thomas Milner, M.A., F.R.Gr.S. Beautifully illustrated with Steel Plates, Star Maps, and Wood Engravings. Royal 8vo, cloth 15s. ; half-calf, 20s. LIFE AND WORKS OF BURNS. Edited by R. Chambers, LL.D. Demy 8vo, 2 vols, cloth £1 ; half-calf, £1, 3s. Foolscap 8vo, 2 vols, cloth 7s. 6d.; half-calf, 12s. DOMESTIC ANNALS OF SCOTLAND. From the Reformation to the Rebellion of 1745. In 3 vols, demy 8vo 40s. SHAKESPEARE'S WORKS. Chambers's Household Edition. Purged of impurities and objection- able phrases ; with Introductions and Notes. Post 8vo. 10 Vols, cloth £1, 10s. Chambers's Cabinet Edition. With Notes and Wood Engravings. 12 Vols, cloth, in case 20s. BOOKS PUBLISHED BY DICTIONARIES. ENGLISH DICTIONARY : a Dictionary of the English Language, Pronouncing, Explanatory, and Etymological, with Vocabulariea of Scottish Words and Phrases, Americanisms, Words and Phrases from Foreign Languages, &c. Edited by Jambs Donald, F.E.G.S. Royal 8 vo, el oth 10s. it half-calf 1 4s. ETYMOLOGICAL DICTIONARY of the English Language, con- taining Etymology, Pronunciation, and Meanings : Etymology of Names of Places ; Words and Phrases from the Latin, the Greek, and Modern Foreign Languages ; Abbreviations ; List of Mythological and Classical Names. 1 vol. crown 8vo, cloth 3s. 6d. Roan, 4s. ; half-calf, 5s. 6cL ; half-morocco, 6s. COOLEY'S ENGLISH DICTIONARY. This Dictionary contains nearly Eighty Thousand Words, and presents in a compact and handy form, not only the best substance of an expensive Dic- tionary, but much that is not usually given in such works, including Classical and Foreign words in common use, and many terms of Art and Science. In 1 vol. 12mo, roan, 7s. ; half-calf 8s. GERMAN DICTIONARY— German and English. 954 pages, cloth 4s. it roan 4s. 6d. All the words are carefully accented according to the most approved modes of pronunciation ; the genitive and plurals of nouns are invari- ably given ; and verbs governing the dative, indicated. LATIN DICTIONARY— Latin and English. 818 pages, cloth 4 a , ii roan 4 S . 6d. W. & E. CHAMBEKS. 7 BOOKS AT 5s. TRADITIONS OF EDINBURGH. By Robert Chambers, LL.D. With Introductory Notice (1868), and additional matter, Frontis- piece by D. Roberts, R.A., and 12 Illustrations. Crown 8vo, cloth 5s. HISTORY OF THE REBELLION OF 1745-46. By Robert Chambers, LL.D. Crown 8vo, cloth 5s. POPULAR RHYMES OF SCOTLAND. By Robert Chambers, LL.D. Crown 8vo, cloth 5s. ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE AUTHOR OF WAVERLEY: being Notices and Anecdotes of Real Characters, Scenes, and Incidents supposed to be described in his works. By Robert Chambers. Third Edition 5s. DOMESTIC ANNALS OF SCOTLAND, from the Reformation to the Rebellion of 1745. By Robert Chambers, LL.D. Abridged Edition 5s. NATURAL HISTORY, its Rise and Progress in Britain, as devel- oped in the Life and Labours of leading Naturalists. By H. Alleyne Nicholson, Regius Professor of Natural History in the University of Aberdeen. With numerous Portraits and Illustrations 5s. ALL ROUND THE YEAR. A Monthly Garland by Thomas Miller, Author of English Country Life, &c. And Key to the Calendar. With Twelve Allegorical Designs by John Leighton, F.S.A., and other Illustrations 5s. ST GILES' LECTURES, a Series of Lectures on the Scottish Church. Crown 8vo, Roxburghe binding 5s. VESTIGES OF THE NATURAL HISTORY OF CREATION. Twelfth Edition, with Introduction relating to the Authorship of the Work, by Alexander Ireland. Illustrated 5s. MEMOIR OF ROBERT CHAMBERS. With Autobiographic Reminiscences of William Chambers, and Supplementary Chapter. 404 pages, post 8 vo, cloth, gilt edges 3s. 6d. BOOKS PUBLISHED BY BOOKS AT 2s. 6d. TRADITIONS OF EDINBURGH. By Robert Chambers, LL.D., with Portrait and Illustrations 2s. 6d. GREAT THINKERS AND WORKERS, being the Lives of Thomas Carlyle, Lord Armstrong, Lord Tennyson, Charles Dickens, Sir Titus Salt, W. M. Thackeray, Sir Henry Bessemer, John Ruskin, James Nasmyth, Charles Kingsley, Builders of the Forth Bridge, &c. Numerous Illustrations 2s. 6d. GOOD AND GREAT WOMEN: a Book for Girls. Queen Victoria, Florence Nightingale, Baroness Burdett-Coutts, Mrs Beecher-Stowe, Jenny Lind, Charlotte Bronte, Mrs Hemans, Dorothy Pattison. Numerous Illustrations 2s. 6d. HISTORIC EVENTS, GREAT. The Conquest of India, Indian Mutiny, French Revolutions, the Crusades, the Conquest of Mexico, Napoleon's Russian Campaign. Illustrated 2s. 6d. HISTORICAL CELEBRITIES. Oliver Cromwell, Washington, Napoleon Bonaparte, Duke of Wellington. Illustrated 2s. 6d. LITERARY CELEBRITIES. Wordsworth, Campbell, Moore, Jeffrey. Numerous Illustrations 2s. 6d. TRAVEL AND ADVENTURE, RECENT— Lieutenant Greely, Joseph Thomson, Stanley, Livingstone, Lady Brassey, Vambery, Burton, &c. Illustrated. 2s. 6d. REMARKABLE PERSONS, STORIES OF. The Herschels, Mary Somerville, Sir Walter Scott, A. T. Stewart, &c. By William Chambers, LL.D. 320 pages, post 8vo 2s. 6d.. OLD FAMILIES, STORIES OF. The Setons, the Cecils, the Walpoles, the Buccleuchs, the Bedfords, &c. By William Chambers, LL.D. 320 pages, post 8vo 2s. 6d. YOUTH'S COMPANION AND COUNSELLOR. By William Chambers, LL.D. New Edition. 312 pages, post 8vo...2s. 6d. SONGS OF SCOTLAND PRIOR TO BURNS. With the Tunes. Edited by Robert Chambers, post 8vo. Illustrated 2s. 6d. W. & E. CHAMBERS. 9 GOLFING : a Handbook of the Game, with Golfing Sketches, Tales, and Poems, the St Andrews Rules, Glossary of Terms, List of Clubs and their Office-bearers in Scotland and England, Notes on the various Links, &c. Illustrated by Ranald M. Alexahder and others. Cloth 2s. 6d. BOOKS AT 2s. HEROES OF ROMANTIC ADVENTURE— Lord Olive, Captain John Smith, Good Knight Bayard, Garibaldi. Illustrated 2s. ANIMAL FRIENDS, OUR— The Dog, Cat, Horse, and Elephant ; with numerous Illustrations 2s. AILIE GILROY: A SCOTTISH STORY. By William Chambees, LL.D. Post 8vo 2s. BIOGRAPHY, EXEMPLARY AND INSTRUCTIVE, with * engraved Frontispiece and Vignette, gilt edges 2s. ESSAYS, FAMILIAR AND HUMOROUS. By Robeet Chambees, LL.D. In two vols. Cloth, each 2s. EMINENT WOMEN, being Biographies from Chambers's Miscel- lany. Cloth 2s. FAMOUS MEN, being Biographies from Chambers's Miscellany. Cloth 2s. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, LIFE AND AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF. Illustrated, cloth 2s. SHIPWRECKS AND TALES OF THE SEA. Illustrated, cloth 2s. MARITIME DISCOVERY AND ADVENTURE. Illustrated. 2s. TALES FOR TRAVELLERS— Being Tales selected from Chambees's Papees for the people. 2 vols., cloth, each 2s. SKETCHES, LIGHT AND DESCRIPTIVE. By William Chambees, LL.D. Crown 8vo, gilt edges 2s. 10 BOOKS PUBLISHED BY TALES FROM CHAMBERS'S JOURNAL. In four vols., each 2s. MISCELLANY OF INSTRUCTIVE AND ENTERTAINING TRACTS. In ten separate volumes, each 2s. BOOKS AT 1s. 6d. ANIMAL LIFE AND HABITS, SKETCHES OF. By A. Wilson, Ph.D. Cloth Is. 6d. ROBINSON CRUSOE, the Life and Strange Surprising Adven- tures of. By Daniel Defoe. With Illustrations. Foolscap 8vo, cloth Is. 6d. TALES AND STORIES. With Frontispieces. Crown 8vo. Cloth, Is. 6d. each. Barrister, Experiences of a. Begumbagh — Story of Indian Mutiny. Buffalo - Hunters. Coast- Guard Tales. Conscript, the. Detective Officer. Fireside Tales. Gold-seekers. Hope of Leascombe. Italian's Child. Jury-Room Tales. Midnight Journey. Olden Stories. Parlour Tales. Rival Clerks. Squire's Daughter. Tales for Home Reading. Tales for Town and Country. Tales for Young and Old. Tales of Adventure. Tales of the Sea. Tales to Shorten the Way. KINDNESS TO ANIMALS, illustrated by Stories and Anecdotes. With Frontispiece. 12mo, cloth Is. 6d. HYGIENE— A manual of Health. Cloth Is. 6d. HOME-NURSING— A manual for use in cases of Illness and Accident. By Rachel A. Neuman Is. 6