Of ornell Iniuerattg Hibrarg 3tl}ara, Krm fork arV18199 Artistic anatomy. Cornell University Library 3 1924 031 240 793 -jsff.e:';x The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924031240793 THE FINE-ART LIBRARY. EDITED BY JOHN C. L. SPARKES, Principal of the National Art Training School, South Kensington Museum. Artistic Anatomy. MATHIAS DUVAL, MEMBER OF THE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, ANATOMICAL PROFESSOR AT THE SCHOOL OF FINE ART, FELLOW OF THE FACULTY OF MEDICINE, DIRECTOR OF THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL LABORATORY AT THE SCHOOL FOR HIGHER STUDIES, PARIS. TRANSLATED BY FREDERICK E. FENTON, M.R.C.P. Edin., FELLOW OF THE MEDICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON, AND MEMBER OF THE WEST LONDON MEDICO-CHIRURG1CAL SOCIETY. jFourti) eaitt'on. CASSELL & COMPANY, Limited: LONDON, PARIS 6= MELBOURNE.' 1890. [ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.) qORHB-L UN! X. LJT-. = 'fj »— AUTHOR'S PREFACE. THIS little work is an epitome of a course of lectures which for about ten years I had the honour of de- livering at the Ecole des Beaux Arts. If during that time I have arrived at a right understanding of the teachings of anatomy, I owe it to the great interest taken in the subject by my listeners of all ages ; and my first duty is to thank them for their free inter- change of ideas with me, thus enabling me to under- stand their requirements and the mode of answering them. But if the mode of exposition I have adopted is to be rendered clear to a constantly renewed audience, I must, in publishing this work, first explain to the reader how the lectures are to be used, and the principles which guided me in their production. This summary of anatomy is intended for those artists who, having commenced their special studies, have drawn the human form either from the antique or from the living model — who, in a word, have already what may be termed a general idea of forms, attitudes, and movements. It is intended to furnish them with a scientific notion of those forms, vi PREFACE. attitudes, and movements. Thus it is far less a de- scription of the forms of a particular region than the anatomical explanation of those forms, and of their modifications in a state of repose or movement, that we have in view. That is why, instead of proceeding from the superficial parts to the deeper organs of the skeleton, we take the latter as the starting-point of our studies. In this way alone can we determine the laws which govern the movements of the adjacent segments of the members upon each other, and the movements of the members with regard to the trunk, as also the reciprocal action of these segments towards each other and in relation to the whole body. When to these fundamental notions is added the knowledge of the muscular masses which move these bones, the artist will at once be enabled to analyse through the skin as through a transparent veil the action of the parts which produce the forms with their infinite variety of character and movement. This method of teaching, which may -be said to proceed by synthesis, differs from that followed by the generality of works on this subject — books which treat by analysis. We make special allusion to the treatise of Gerdy,* which is about the most careful * P. N. Gerdy : " Anatomy of the Forms of the Human Body for Painting, Sculpture, and Surgery." Paris, 1829. PREFACE. Vli work on plastic anatomy yet published, but which errs in a somewhat too lengthy description of the exterior form, whilst sufficient space is not devoted to explaining the anatomical reasons of those forms. On the other hand, the remaining anatomical works in the hands of the students in our art schools generally comprise a volume of text and an illustrated atlas.* Under these conditions, may I be allowed to remark, somewhat severely, it may be, that our young artists study the atlas by copying and re-copying the plates, but do not read the text. Thus it will be under- stood why, in this work, a different method has been pursued ; and the fact of the plates being intermixed with the text, and in such a way that they cannot well be understood without the aid of the accompany- ing pages, will in all probability result in the student thoroughly and carefully perusing the text. Passing on to the manner of using the present work, we. must acknowledge that reading anatomical details is at first dry ; it will always be so, unless proceeded with in a simple and systematic manner. In the oral courses, the lecturer, handling the objects, and aided by his improvised drawings on the black- * It is not always thus abroad, Thus in Germany there is the work of E. Harless ("Lehrbuch der Plastischen Anatomie fur Akade- mische Anstalten." Stuttgart, 1876; 2nd edit.) VH1 PREFACE. board, can make the most complex parts interesting ; and by adroit repetitions and varied illustrations, fix the attention and render the subject compre- hensible, whereas it is quite different in a written description. In this case it is the reader who must animate the text for himself, by examining and manipulating the parts needful for the elucidation of the descriptions. For this purpose a skeleton and a "good plaster cast will suffice. On the cast, with the aid of the plates which accompany the text, it will be easy .to follow the course of the muscles ; and in this way alone will the study of them become profitable, the student being enabled to examine the model on different sides. By handling the bones, by placing the articulating surfaces in contact, the dry descriptions of articulated mechanism will take a tangible form, and will henceforth remain impressed on the memory. Notwithstanding our diagrams of the movements of pronation and supination for example, it is only by handling the bones of the fore-arm that the student will be enabled to fully appreciate the marvellous mechanism by which the rotation of the radius round the ulna is effected, allowing the hand to present alternately its palmar and dorsal surface ; and the same is the case as regards the skeleton of the foot and head, and the movements of the lower jaw, &c. PREFACE. IX The artist will find in this book some pages devoted to the facial angle, to the forms of the head, brachy- eephalic and dolichocephalic heads, and to some other questions of anthropology, and will doubtless thank us for having considered here ideas which are daily becoming familiar to the general public. Our only regret concerning these anthropological studies is that the limits of this volume did not permit us to go deeper into the teachings of the anthropo- logical laboratory, the direction of which was confided to me after the loss of our illustrious master, Broca. I take this opportunity of expressing my gratitude to my excellent master, Professor Sappey, who allowed me to borrow from his magnificent treatise on anatomy the figures on osteology and myology which consti- tute the chief merit of this work ; and to my friend and colleague, E. Cuyer, whose skilful pencil repro- duced the figures from the photographic atlas of Duchenne, as well as the two illustrations of the Gladiator, and the sundry diagramatic drawings which complete the theoretical explanations of the text. M. DUVAL. CONTENTS. CHATTER PACK I. Introduction. — Plastic Anatomy : Its History, Importance, and Objects — Order of these Studies — Division of Subject i JFtet \@Hrt.— OSTEOLOGY. II. Osteology and the Science of Joints in General — Nomenclature — Vertebral Column . . 13 III. Skeleton of the Trunk (Thorax) — Sternum — Ribs — Thorax as a Whole 30 IV. Skeleton of Shoulder — Clavicle— Scapula — Head of Humerus — Shoulder Joint .... 43 V. Humerus and Elbow Joint 55 VI. Skeleton of Fore-Arm — Radius and Ulna — Move- ments of Pronation and Supination . . 64 VII. Skeleton of the Hand— Wrist (Carpus)— Hand and Fingers (Metacarpal Bones and Phalanges) — Proportions of the Upper Limb — Brachial Index — Egyptian Canon 74 VIII. Skeleton of the Hips — Pelvis (Iliac Bones and Sacrum) — The Pelvis according to Sex . . 91 IX. The Femur and the Articulation of the Hips — Proportions of the Hips and Shoulders . 104 X. The Femur and the Articulation of the Knee Joint ; the Shape of the Region of the Knee 122 XI. Skeleton of the Leg : Tibia and Fibula, the Malleoli or Ankles— General View of the Skeleton of the Foot ; Tibio Tarsal Articu- lation 137 XII. Skeleton of the Foot ; Tarsus (Calcaneum) ; Metatarsus ; Toes and Fingers — Proportions of the Inferior Members— The Foot as a Common Measure 146 Xll CONTENTS. CHAPTER PAGE XIII. Skeleton of the Head : Skull (Occipital, Pari- etal, Frontal, Temporal) ; Shapes of the Skull (Dolichocephalic and Brachycephalic Heads) 155 XIV. Skeleton of the Face : the Orbital Cavities ; Lower Jaw ; Teeth — Facial Angle of Camper 165 SeconK part.— MYOLOGY. XV. Of the Muscles in General — Muscles of the Trunk : Anterior Region (Pectoralis Major ; the Oblique and Recti Muscles of the Abdo- men) 181 XVI. Muscles of the Back.: Trapezius, Latissimus Dorsi, and Teres Major Muscles . . . 195 XVII. Muscles of the Shoulder : Deltoid : Serratus Magnus — The Hollow and Shape of the Arm- pit 205 XVIII. Muscles of the Arm : Biceps ; Coraco-Brachi- alis ; Brachialis Anticus ; Triceps — Shape of the Arm 214 XIX. Muscles of the Fore-Arm : Muscles Anterior, External and Posterior Superficial . . 222 XX. The Deep Posterior Muscles of the Fore-Arm (Anatomical Snuff-Box) — Muscles of the Hand XXI; Muscles of the Pelvis, the Gluteal Muscles ; Fascia Lata. — Muscles of the Thigh : Sar- torius, Triceps, Adductors, &c. . . . 240 XXII. Muscles of the Leg — Tendon Achilles — Muscles of the Foot XXIII. Muscles of the Neck : Sterno-Cleido-Mastoid, Infra-Hyoid, and Supra-Hyoid Muscles . . 268 XXIV. Muscles of the Head— Muscles of Mastication \ —Muscles of Expression : History (Leonardo \ da Vinci ; Humbert de Superville ; Duchenne \ of Boulogne, and Darwin) .... 277 •XXV. Muscles of Expression — Possible and Impos- sible Combinations of Certain Contractions of the Muscles of the Face .... 204 233 255 Artistic Anatomy. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION. Anatomy in general ; the anatomy of the external forms of man : physiology of the same. Origin of the knowledge of the Greek artists of the anatomy of the external forms ; the influence of gymnastics upon Greek art. The Renaissance and anatomical study: Mundini de Luzi (1316J. — The anatomical studies of Leonardo da Vinci, Michael Angelo, and Raphael. Titian and Andre 1 Vesale. The anatomical course of the School of Painting (1648). What the artist requires in the study of anatomy : pro- portions, forms (or contours), attitudes, movements. The order of these studies ; divisions of the subject. ANATOMY, as the derivation of the word indicates - (from avci, across, and rofifj, section), is the study of the parts composing the body — muscles, bones, tendons, ligaments, various viscera, &c. — parts which we separate one from the other by dissection, in order to examine their shapes and their relations and con- nections. This study may be accomplished in various ways : (1) from a philosophical and comparative point of view, by seeking the analogies and differences that the organs present in animals of different species — which is called Comparative Anatomy ; (2) from a B 2 ARTISTIC ANATOMY. practical point of view, by seeking out the arrange- ment of organs, the knowledge of which is indispens- able to the physician and surgeon — this is called Surgical or Topographical Anatomy ; (3) by examin- ing the nature and arrangement of the organs which determine the external forms of the body — this is Plastic Anatomy, called also the Anatomy of External Forms, the Anatomy of Artists. It is the anatomy of external forms that we shall study here ; but as the artist ought to know not only the form of the body in repose, or in the dead subject, but also the principal changes of form in the body when in a state of activity, of movement, and of function, and should understand the causes which determine these changes, plastic anatomy ought to be complemented by a cer- tain amount of knowledge of the functions of the organs, e.g., muscles and articulations ; so that under the title of anatomy of the external forms of man we shall study at the same time the anatomy and the physiology of the organs which determine these forms. We should be contending for what has been long since conceded, were we to endeavour to show to what an extent the studies of anatomy and physiology are indispensable to the artist, who seeks to represent the human form under many and various types of action. Nevertheless, it may be useful to explain how the chefs-d'oeuvre of ancient art have been produced with admirable anatomical exactness, by men who certainly had not gone through any anatomical studies, and to show what special conditions aided them to acquire, by constant practice, the knowledge that we INTRODUCTION. 3 are obliged to seek day by day in the stud) of anatomy. The Greek sculptors have reproduced the human form with marvellous anatomical exactness ; in fact, the works of Phidias (the Theseus and the Ilissus), those of Myron (the Discobolus), those of Lysippus and of Praxiteles (the Sleeping Fawn), those of Agasia? (the Fighting Gladiator), and other masterpieces given as models in all the schools of art, are such that it is impossible to find fault with them, or to discover in them the least inexactitude, either from an anatomical or a physiological point of view ; * in fact, not only are the muscles, for example, prominent exactly in their places, but more than that, these prominences are differently accentuated in corresponding muscles on the different sides, according to the nature of the movement ; one side will present the muscles swelled up in a state of contraction, or the muscles may be in repose, that is, relaxed and relatively flattened. At the time when these works of art were produced, the study of anatomy, or even the dissection of the human body, had not yet been attempted ; the respect in which the dead body was held was such, that the physicians themselves, who should have been able to justify their motives for this study, had never as yet dissected a human body ; in order to supply this want of direct knowledge Hippocrates had dissected animals, and * We must look for other reasons than ignorance or indifference to explain the fixed scapulae in pre-Phidian sculpture or the exaggerated forms given to the extensor brevis of the foot and other muscles. This qualification is necessary to this general statement. — Ed. B 2 4 ARTISTIC ANATOMY. had arrived at certain conclusions by the analogy that exists between the organs of quadrupeds and those in man. Galen himself dissected monkeys only, seeking to confine his examination to animals, whose anatomical construction might be considered as most closely resembling that of man. Galen never possessed a human skeleton, for in a passage in his anatomical works, he states the pleasure that he found in studying at last some human bones that had been deposited in a marshy place by a river which had overflowed its banks. We seem then to have a singular contradiction between these two facts, as we know on the one hand, that the Greek artists have shown in their works a most rigorous anatomical exactitude, whilst on the other hand, neither they nor their contemporary physicians and surgeons had made a study of the anatomy of man by the practice of dissection. But this contradiction disappears altogether when we examine the conditions which permitted those artists to have constantly before their eyes the nude human body, living and in motion, and so set them to work to analyse the forms, and thus to acquire by the observation, of the mechanism of active mus- cular changes, an empirical knowledge, as precise as that which is now obtained by the accurate study of anatomy and physiology. It is sufficient, in fact,' to recall to mind the extreme care the ancients gave to the development of strength and of physical beauty by gymnastic exercises. In Homer we see the heroes exercising themselves in INTRODUCTION. 5 racing, in quoit throwing, and in wrestling; later we come to the exercise of the athletes who trained themselves to carry off the palm in the Olympic games ; and it is evident, in spite of the ideas that we hold now respecting wrestlers . and acrobats, that the profession of an athlete was considered a glorious one, as being one which not only produced a con- dition of physical beauty and high character, but constituted in itself a true nobility. Thus the life of the gymnast came to exercise a decisive in- fluence on Greek art. The prize of the conqueror in the Olympic games was a palm, a crown of leaves, an artistic vase; but the chief glory of all was that the statue of the victor was sculptured by the most celebrated artist of the time. Thus Phidias produced the handsome form of Pantarces, and these athletic statues form almost the only archives of the Olym- piads, upon which Emeric David was able to recon- struct his Greek chronology. From these works, which became ideals of strength and beauty, the artist had long been able to study his model, which he saw naked every day, not only before his exercises, whilst rubbing himself over with oil, but during the race, or the leap- ing match, which showed the muscles of the inferior extremities, or during the throwing of the quoit, which made the contractions of the muscular masses of the arm and the shoulder prominent ; and during the wrestling matches, which from the infinite varieties of effort, successively brought all the muscular powers into play. Was it then surprising, that the images of the gods destitute of movement and of life, which 6 ARTISTIC ANATOMY. had so long satisfied the religious sentiment of the people, were succeeded by artistic representations of man in action in statues such as could embody the idea of strength and beauty, studies of the living statues of the gymnasium ? Further we shall see the decline of art proceed side by side with the abandonment of the exercises of the gymnasium. Much later, in the Middle Ages, art awoke and embodied ideas in figures with- out strength and life indeed, but which nevertheless express in a marvellous manner the mysterious aspira- tions of the period ; but these have not anything in common with the realistic representation of the human form well developed and active, as seen in Greek art. At the time of the Renaissance, artists not having any longer a living source of study in athletic sports, recog- nised the necessity of seeking for more precise know- ledge in the anatomical study of the human body, in addition to the inspiration drawn from the study of the antique, and thus we see that the revival of the plastic arts came about at the time of the introduc- tion more or less regular of the practice of dissection. This was not brought about without some difficulty. In the year 1230, Frederic II., Emperor of Germany and King of the Two Sicilies, passed a law prohibiting the practice of medicine without the practitioners having first studied the anatomy of the human body. In spite of two papal ex- communications hurled against the author of this edict, dissections were henceforth regularly pursued in Italy ; and one century later — in the year 13 16 — Mundini de Luze was able to write the INTRODUCTION. first treatise on human anatomy, containing des- criptions made from studies of the dead body. This treatise was printed in 1478. Artists rivalled physicians in the ardour with which they pursued their anatomical studies; and it may be said that all the painters and sculptors in the fifteenth century. gave most careful attention to dissec- tion, or at least studied demonstrations made upon the dead body, for all have left amongst their drawings studies that leaver no doubt On this head. Among the great masters it may be noted that Leonardo da Vinci (1452 — 1519), has left thirteen portfolios of various drawings and studies, among which are numerous anato- mical studies of remarkable fidelity. The greater num- Reproduct!on of . draw!ng of an ber Of these Were taken anatomical study by Leonardo de r htm i_ ii_ f t. Vinci " < Cnoulant ' s work > P a g e 8 ') trom Milan by the frenCtl This design represents the minute in 1796, and afterwards they ^*^^ h *» 1 were in part restored to Italy, some of them, however, went to enrich the British Museum in London, and were published by. 8 ARTISTIC ANATOMY. Chamberlain* In Fig. I is reproduced one of these anatomical drawings. It shows with what care — per- haps with over-scrupulous care — the illustrious master endeavoured to separate by dissection the various fasciculi of pectoral muscle, deltoid, and sterno-cleido mastoid. It may be noted also that in the Treatise on Painting Leonardo da Vinci devotes numerous chapters to the description of the muscles of the body, the joints of the limbs and of the " cords and small tendons which meet together when the muscles contract to produce its action," &c. ; and finally, in this same Treatise on Painting, he makes allusion at different times to a Treatise on Anatomy, which he intended to publish, and for which he had gathered together numerous notes. These are fortunately preserved in the Royal Library at Windsor. Michael Angelo also (1475 — 1564) made at Florence many laborious studies of dissections, and has left among his drawings beautiful illustrations of anatomy, of which several have been published in Choulant's work, and by Seroux d'Agincourtf Finally, we 'have numerous drawings by Raphael himself, as proof of his anatomical researches, among which we ought to mention as particularly remark- able, a study of the skeleton intended to give him the exact indication of the direction of the limbs * See Ludwig Choulant. Gesichte und Bibliographic des Anatom- eschen Abbildungen. .Leipzig : 1852. (A very curious work wherein is found much information respecting the connection of anatomy with the plastic arts.) t Seroux D' A gincourt. History of Art I y its Monuments. Paris: 181 1, Vol. i., p. 177. INTRODUCTION. 9 and the position of the joints for a figure of the swooning Virgin in his painting of the Entombment (Choulant, p. 15). We cannot end this short enumeration without quoting further the names of Titian and Andr£ Vesale, in order to show into what intimate relations artists and anatomists were brought by their common studies. Titian, in fact, is considered the real author of the admirable figures which illustrate the work — "De Humani Corporis Fabrica" — of the immortal anatomist, Andre Vesale, justly styled the restorer of anatomy. It is necessary, however, to add that though some of the drawings are by Titian, the greater number were executed by his pupil, Jean Calcar, as is pointed out in the preface to the edition of the work pub- lished at Bale in 1543. The renaissance of the plastic arts and that of anatomy were therefore simultaneous, and closely bound up one with the other ; ever since that time it has been generally recognised that it is necessary to get by anatomical study that knowledge of form which the Greeks found themselves able to embody ' in consequence of the opportunities they had of study- ing the human figure in the incessant exercises of the gymnasium. Again, in 1648, when Louis XIV. founded at Paris the Academie de Peinture et de Sculpture, which later on took the title of the £cole des beaux-arts, two sections of study were in- stituted side by side with the studios properly so called, for imparting to the. pupils instruction con- sidered as fundamental, and indispensable to the IO ARTISTIC ANATOMY. practice of art. These were the sections of per- spective and anatomy. It is not our place to plead, otherwise than by the preceding historical considerations, the cause of an- atomy in its relation to painting and sculpture ; but we ought at least to examine what method is likely to prove the most useful for its study. If each ana- tomical detail does not correspond to an artistic need we are liable in following any treatise written with other than an artistic aim, to be entangled in superfluous names and into useless descriptions ; while at the same time we might neglect details which are to the artist of great importance, although considered • of secondary value by authors who have written espe- cially for students in medicine. We ought, then, to ask ourselves, in the first place, what are the ideas that the artist should seek for in his study of anatomy ? To this question all will reply that the ideas of proportion, of form, of attitudes and movements, are those in which anatomy. is relied upon to furnish precise rules; and as the expression of the passions, either in painting or sculpture, cannot be reproduced except by various changes in the general attitude of the body, and in the special mechanism of the physiognomy moved by the muscles, we must conclude -that our study should deal not only with proportions, form, atti- tudes and movements, but also with the expression of the emotions and passions. This, then, is the object to be attained. Suppose we try to accomplish it by examining in a first series of studies . all that INTRODUCTION. 1 1 belongs to proportions ; afterwards, in a second series, all that has relation to form ; in a third, attitudes, &c. Such an order of proceeding, logical though it be, will have the disadvantage of causing numerous repetitions, and the more serious inconvenience of artificially separating parts which in the structure of the body are intimately connected. Thus, form is determined sometimes by osseous prominences, sometimes by the soft parts, which may be muscular or tendinous. Attitudes are determined by the mus- cles ; but these are subject to laws which result from the position and action of the joints; so with move- ments,- in the expression of which it is necessary to consider, at the same time, what the conformation of the osseous levers (the direction of the bones and their articulation) allows,- as well as that which the mus- cles accomplish, also the direction of the muscles and the differences of shape produced by their swell- ing and tension in action, as well as when the antago- nist muscles are' relaxed. Proportions themselves cannot be denned without an exact knowledge of the skeleton, for it is the bones alone which should fur- nish us with the marks from which to take measure- ments. A knowledge of the bones and of their articular mechanism is indispensable to us, that we may guard ourselves against being deceived in cer- tain apparent changes of length in the limbs when certain movements take place. We see, then, that all the ideas previously enu- merated as proportion, form, attitude, movement, de- pend on the study of the skeleton and of the muscles. 12 ARTISTIC ANATOMY. It will thus be easiest and most advantageous to proceed in the following manner : — We will first of all study the skeleton, which will teach us the direction of the axis of each part of the limbs, the relative lengths and proportions of these portions, and the osseous parts which remain uncovered by the muscles, and show beneath the skin the shape and the mechanism of the articulations in their relation to movements and attitudes. We shall then study the muscles, and endeavour to know their shapes, at the same time that we complete the knowledge we shall have acquired of attitudes and movements. In the third place, we will attempt the analysis of the expression of the passions and emotions ; and the study of the muscles of the face,- of which the mechanism in the movements of the physiognomy is so special, that it would be incon- venient to attempt to treat it with that of the muscles of the trunk and limbs. dfinst part THE BONES. CHAPTER II. THE SKELETON, ARTICULATIONS, PROPORTIONS. Osteology and Arthrology. — The method of anatomical nomenclature : Parts on the median line, single and symmetrical ; the lateral parts in pairs ; the meaning of the terms internal and external. — Of the bones in general : the long bones (shafts and extremities) ; the flat bones (surfaces, borders); the short bones. — Prominences of bone (processes, spines) cavities and depressions of bone (fossae, grooves). — Bone and cartilage. — The axis of the skeleton: the vertebral column. — The vertebrae (bodies, transverse processes, spinous processes, &c.) — Cervical region (seven vertebrae), Dorsal (twelve vertebrae), Lumbar (five vertebrae). — Articulations of the vertebrae. — Movements of the head (atlas and axis). — The curves of the vertebral column. — Outline of the posterior aspect of the column. Proportions. In view of what we have already said it will be evident that, in studying the skeleton, we shall be examining a great number of forms and considering the mechanism of movements and attitudes, while at the same time we are acquiring a knowledge of the .proportions of the body. This suffices to show the importance of Osteology, or the study bf bones (oareov, bone ; \6yos, description), and of Arthrology, or the study of joints (apdpov, a joint) : we may say, in 14 ARTISTIC ANATOMY. fact, to use a formula which well expresses the physio- logical functions of those parts, that the bones are the levers of movement, and that the articulations repre- sent the fixed points or fulcrums of these levers; while the powers which produce motion are repre- sented by the muscles. Before attempting the details of the differentparts of the skeleton, it is necessary to consider the method of nomenclature, so that by the employment of proper terms, we may make the descriptions which follow more easy. In the first place, in anatomy, in the description of the bones, as in those of other organs, we have to consider the relation of the portion under considera- tion with - the rest of the body : and thus each bone, as well as the other organs or their parts, will be found under one or other of two different conditions : either it belongs to the median portion of the body, which is when the antero-posterior vertical plane, passing through the axis of the body, divides it into two similar segments ; or else it is situated outside this median plane. As a type of the first class, we will take the sternum (see fig. 7, p. 31); this is a central single bone; it has no fellow, and is com- posed of two symmetrical portions, one part on the right and one part on the left ; as a type of the second class, we will take the humerus (fig. 12, p. 49), which is a bone situated at the side and one of a. pair, inasmuch as there are two, one on the right and one on the left of the median plane. From these two examples it is easy to understand that for the THE SKELETON, ARTICULATIONS, PROPORTIONS. 1 5 description of each single and symmetrical bone, it will be necessary to speak of anterior parts or surfaces (looking at the anterior portion of the body), of the posterior parts (looking from behind), of the lateral portions (right and left), finally, of parts superior and inferior, (in the case of the sternum a superior and inferior extremity) : on the other hand,. in the descrip- tion of a double and non-symmetrical bone, we shall also have to speak as heretofore of parts superior and inferior, anterior and posterior ; but instead of two similar symmetrical portions, one on each side of an imaginary line, it has two dissimilar halves, of which one looking towards the median plane, towards the axis of the body, is called the internal part, and the other looking to the outer side (as away from the axis) is called the external part. It is necessary, for brevity and accuracy, to clearly comprehend the meaning of these terms in descriptive anatomy (anterior and pos- terior, internal and external, superior and inferior) which serve to show the relation of the parts to the skeleton aS a whole. After this first division of bones into single and median, and into double and lateral, if we glance at the skeleton (Fig. 2), it seems at first sight that the various bones present an infinite variety of shape, and defy classification or nomenclature ; careful attention however, will show us that they may be all in- cluded- in one of the following three classes — viz., the long bones, the flat, or broad bones, and the short bones. The long, bones, which usually act as the axes 1 6 ARTISTIC ANATOMY. of the limbs (eg., the humerus, femur, tibia, &c.) are composed of a central portion, cylindrical or pris- matic in shape, called the body, shaft, or diaphysis (Stcufyvas, to be between), and of two extremities, or epiphyses (enifyvw, to be at the end), usually marked by protuberances and articular surfaces. The flat bones (eg.,, the shoulder-blade and the iliac bone) are formed of osseous plates, on which we discover surfaces, borders, and angles, all easy to understand with special explanations. Finally, the small bones, which are found all together in the median portion and centre of the skeleton in the vertebral column and in the extremities of the limbs, the hand and foot, present a form more or less wedge-shaped, of which we describe surfaces and borders. Whether the bone be long, flat, or short, it pre- sents prominences and depressions. The projecting portions of bone are called by various names — tuberosities, protuberances, processes, apophyses, crests, spines. To some of these names is added an adjective, which shows, more or less exactly, the form of the process or projection. Thus we speak of a spinous process, mastoid process (/iatn-09, a nipple ; el8