pr: cry 03 < t cfl _ ^ u z o o (J o c c o «5 00 3 a. 5 I a. o o c u c o o Xi H z < a < o , X to E < S J I o I 3 I O Q M O —) to z < S o u <. o 99 Cornell University Library KD 7869.C87 1870 The Criminal Law Consolidation Acts :wit 3 1924 021 861 657 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tile Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924021861657 THE OEIMINAL LAW CONSOLIDATION ACTS; WITH NOTES OP THE CASES DECIDED ON THEIE CONSTEUCTION. Tl^'^"^ Bt EDWAED W. ^OX, S.L., Recorder of Portsmouth; THOMAS WILLIAM SAUNDBES, Esq., JSanister-at-Lam, Recorder of Bath. THE THIRD EDITION, CONTAINING THE SUBSEQUENT OEIMINAL LAW STATUTES. THE PRINCIPLES OF PUNISHMENT, BY EDWARD W. COX, S.U THE LAW OF ARREST WITHOUT A WARRANT, ' AND THE LAW AS TO ATTEMPTS TO COMMIT CRIMES, BY C. & GREAVES, ac. ♦ A TABLE OF CRIMES AND THEIR PUNISHMENTS. BY H. F. PURCELL, ESa Barnster-at-Law. LONDON: LAW TIMES OFFICE, 10, WELLmGTON STREET, STRAND, W 0. 1870. LONDON : PKINTED BT HORACE COX, WELLINGTON-STREET, STRAND. PREFACE. The following " Table of Crimes and their Punish- ments " having been framed in imitation of the more elaborate one of Mb. Oke, in chap. ii. of Part II, of his valuable work, " The Magisteeial Synopsis," and in a considerable measure adapted from it, the Compiler desires in this place to express his obligations for the aid obtained from the " Synopsis," which saved him from much labour in the collation of the Criminal Law Statutes. Some of the earlier copies of this work appeared without this acknowledgnlent, much to the Compiler's regret. H; F. P. Temple, Dec. 12, 1870. PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION. Advantage has been taken of the call for a new edition of this volume to introduce the entire of the Criminal Law, as affected by statute and by judicial decision from the passing of the Criminal Law Consolidation Acts to the end of the last session of Parliament. ' By the courtesy of Mr, Q-ebavbs, Q.C, the learned framer of those consolidated acts, the Editors are enabled to add valuable papers from his pen on two often recurring but imperfectly understood questions in Criminal Law : the one, upon the Power to Arrest without Warrant; the other, upon the Law of Attempts to Commit Crimes. One of the Editors has contributed a short Essay designed to suggest to Judges and Magistrates some principles by which the Punishment of Crime may be regulated, with a view to the bringing about of more uniformity in sentences ; and Mr. PuBCBLL has prepared a Table of Crimes and their Punishments, which will be useful for ready reference. Tenq)h, Oct. 15, 1870. CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION. page The Peinciples of Pdnishment. By Edward W. Cox, S.L i The Fobjeitdkb foe Felonies Act. By Edward W. Cox, S.L xlviii The HABiTnAL Cbimdiais Act. By Edward W. Oox, S.L. Iv The Law of Aekest without a ■Wabrant. By 0. S.. GhreaTes, Esq., Q.G. Ixi The Law as to Attempts to Commit Ckimes. By C. S. Greaves, Esq., Q.C. ... Ixxxiv Tabu! of Cbimes and theie Pdhishmbnts. By H. F. Puroell, Barrieter-at-Law .. ... ... ... cxxv STATUTES. 24 & 25 Vict. t. 94 (Accessories and Abettors) 1 24 & 25 Vict. u. 95 (Criminal Statutes Repeal) 6 24 & 25 Vict. c. 96 (Larceny) 22 24 & 25 Vict. c. 97 (Malicious Injuries to Property) ... 100 24 & 25 Vict., c. 98 (Forgery) 139 24 & 25 Viof. 0. 99 (Coinage Offences) 174 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100 (Offences against the Person) 198 24 Vict. c. 10 (Admiralty Court JuHsdiotion), s. 26 ... 235 24 & 25 Vict. c. 66 (Criminal Proceedings Oath Belief) ... 236 24 & 25 Vict. c. 110 (Dealers in Old Metal), ss. 3, 4, 5 ... 237 24 & 25 Vict. c. 44 (Discharged Prisoners Aid) 240 25 & 26 Vict. u. 54 (Transfer of Land), ss. 105, 106, 107, 138, 139, 140 243 25 & 26 Viot. u. 63 (Merchant Shipping Act Amendment), ss. 16, 66 245 25 & 26 Viot. 0. 64 (Naval and Victualling Stores), ss. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,22,23 247 Contents. 25 & 26 Vict. 0. 65 (Jurisdiction in Homicides) 261 25 & 26 Vict, c. 88 (Merchandise Marks) 276 25 & 26 Vict. 0. 89 (The Companies), ss. 166, 167, 168, 169 293 25 & 26 Vict. 0. 103 (Union Assessment Committee), s. 40 294 25 & 26 Vict. o. 107 (The Juries, 1862) 295 25 & 26 Vict. c. 114 (Poaching Prevention) 303 26 & 27 Vict. c. 103 (Misappropriation by Servants) ... 306 27 & 28 Vict. c. 47 (Penal Servitude Acts Amendment) ... 310 27 & 28 Vict. 0. 110 (Limited Penalties) 317 28 Vict. c. 18 (Felony and Misdemeanor, Evidence and Prac- tice Amendment) ... ... ... ... ... ... 318 28 & 29 Vict. c. 127 (SmaU Penalties) 321 29 & 30 Vict. c. 52 (Prosecution Expenses) 323 29 & 30 Vict. 0. 117 (Reformatory Schools) 326 29 & 30 Vict. c. 118 (ludnstrial Schools) 349 30 & 31 Vict. u. 35 (Criminal Law Amendment) 374 30 & 31 Vict. o. 115 (Justices of the Peace) 381 30 & 31 Vict. c. 119 (Naval Stores (No. 2) 383 31 Vict. 0. 24 (Capital Punishment within Prisons) ... 389 31 & 32 Vict. c. 37 (Documentary Evidence) 395 31 & 32 Vict. o. 52 (Vagrant Act Amendment) 399 31 & 32 Vict. u. 116 (Larceny and Embezzlement) 400 32 & 33 Vict. 0. 62 (Debtors) 402 32 & 38 Vict. o. 68 (Evidence further Amendment) 416 32 & 33 Vict. c. 99 (Habitual Criminals) 418 33 & 34 Vict. 0. 23 (Forfeitures for Treason and Felony) ... 433 33 & 34 Vict. c. 49 (Evidence Amendment) 448 33 & 34 Vict. 0. 52 (Extradition) 450 33 & 34 Vict. c. 60 (Forgery) 467 Index 471 TABLE OF CASES. page Hancock ». Lowes ... ... 216 Eeg. Hndson v. McBea ... ... 38 Beg. NeatB V. Hart ... 91 e4 Eeg. W.Barrow ... 218 Eeg. Beg. V. Bowers ... 60 Eeg. Beg. V. Brackenridge ... 149 Eeg. Eeg. 17. Brown „. ... 226 Eeg. Beg. V. Bucknell ... ... 27 Eeg. Eeg. V. Bnnkall ... 27 Eeg. Eeg. V. Burrell ... 222 Eeg. Eeg. V. Bullock ... 121 Beg. Beg. V. Can well ... 205 Beg. Beg. V. Carpenter ... ... 61 Eeg. Beg. V. OollinB ... 26 Eeg. Eeg. V. Orabb ... 76 Eeg. Eeg. V. Craoknell ... ... 51 Eeg. Eeg. t;. Deering ... 59 Beg. Eeg. V. Dowey ... 76 Eeg. Eeg. V. Edgell ... 101 Eeg. Eeg. V. Elrington ... ... 217 Beg. Beg. V. Falkingham... ... 207 Eeg. Beg. V. Firth ... 25 Eeg. Eeg. V. Fisher ... 107 Eeg. Eeg. V. Fitch ... 155 Eeg. Beg. V. Fletcher ... 23 Eeg. Eeg. ». Fletcher ... 218 Eeg. Beg. V. French ... 155 Eeg. Eeg. V. Fretwell ... 204 Bel. Eeg. V. Gardner ... 26 Eeg. Eeg. V. Garrett ... 27 Beg. Eeg. V. Giles ... 75 Beg. Eeg. V. Glover ... 62 Eeg. Beg. V. Glyde ... 26 Beg. Eeg. V. Gray ... 107 Beg. Eeg. V. Gregory ... 2 Eeg. Eeg. V. Guthrie ... 220 Eeg. Eeg. V. Hapgood ... 219 Beg. Eeg. V. Haasell ... 27 Eeg. Beg. V. Haywood ... ... 28 Eeg. Eeg. V. Hlbbert ... 222 Eeg. ;. V. Hillman . V. Hoare . V. Howley . V. Isaacs . V. Jackson . V. Jarrald . V. Jennison . V. Johnson . V. .Johnson . V. Jones... . V. Joyce... ; V. Keena . V. Kerrigan . V. Langmead ; V. Lee ... . V. Lee ... . V. Low ... . V. Lowrie . V. Lumley . V. M'Athey . V. McGrath . V, Marsden . V. Marshall . V. Martin '. V, Martin . V. May ... . V. Meakin . V. Mockford . V. Morris . V. Mutters . Peak ... . V. Pressy . V. Eeardon . V. Bedford . V. Binaldi . V. Eitson . V. Bobertson . V. Bobinson :. V. Eobinson . V. Eogers page .. 226 ,. 27 .. 155 ,. 225 .. 27 ,. 65 . 75 ,. 53 ,. 220 ,. 224 .. 165 . 63 ,. 77 ,. 26 . 75 ,. 77 . 59 . 40 . 222 . 80 . 25 . 213 . 60 . 76 . 195 . 226 . 76 . 26 . 217 . 26 . 38 . 219 . 80 . 61 . 152 . 163 . 50 , 181 , 216 . 92 Table of Cases. Heg. ». Eeg. V. Eeg. V. Beg. V. Eeg. V. Beg. ». Reg. V. Eeg. ». Beg. ». Beg. V. Eeg. !». Eeg. V. 4 page Eyland 220 Saunders 212 SMoHe 25 Smith ... 155 Smith 207 Stainer 62 Stimpson 38 Suter... 76 Thomas 410 Thompson 56 Thompson 75 Tretwell 225 Eeg. ». Beg. V. Eeg. V, Beg. V. Beg. V. Eeg. V. Beg, V. Eeg. V. Eeg. V. Eeg. ». Taylor Tuberfield Turner Tyrie... Walker Walton Ward Weeks Weeks Williams Wyatt V. Newman page 212 61 61 217 50 50 27 186 125 219 37 SOME SUGGESTIONS TO JUDGES AND MAGISTEATES FOB BETTER DEFIHING THB PEINCIPLE8 OF PUNISHMENT. BY EDWARD W. COX, S.L., Recorder of Portsmouth. In a speeoli addressed to the House of Lords, on Friday, April 1, 1870, Lord Penzance tlius commented upon tlie inequality of the punishments awarded by different Courts : No doubt there is often an impression among the public that sentences are in some cases far too heavy, and in others far too light ; but they are often imperfectly informed, for the newspaper reports, although extremely able and faithful, are mere skeletons of the evidence, and readers of the public prints may very well come to the conclusion that there has been undue severity, whereas if they heard the whole of the evidence they would be perfectly satisfied. Still, no doubt, there is some amouut of dissatis'faction with sentences, and particularly with their inequality. That will always be the case so long aa Judges have an almost unlimited discretion, and I would not desire to limit it, for it is obvious there may be circumstances of aggravation or extenuation which may call for a light or heavy sentence. In every criminal case, however, two things have to be considered — first, the heinousness or enormity of the crime, itself, and, secondly, the particular circumstances under which the prisoner has committed it. Now, the first, one wxjuld think, should be determined by the law. Take the case of forgery, burglary, or ii Principles of Punishment. rape. One would hold forgery to be the worst crime that could be committed in a highly civilised and commercial community ; another would hold that burglary was a much greater crime; and a third might hold that rape was the worst offence of all. Now, if you were to assemble fifteen men, and take their opinions on these separate classes of crime, you would not find them agree ; yet this is the question which the fifteen Judges have to determine. In passing every sentence, a Judge has to settle what is the enormity of burglary, forgery, and rape before he investigates how the standard of punishment should be exceeded or diminished in that particular case. If a Judge regards forgery as a crime of the deepest dye, he will invariably visit it with a very heavy sentence ; but a Judge on the neigh- bouring circuit may see in it only a form of robbery or cheating, and every case of the kind will be leniently dealt with. This inequality of sentences is due to the absence of any standard ; for if there were a standard laid down, still leaving the Judges the utmost liberty of increasing or diminishing it, it would be felt that in nine cases out of ten the Judges would not disturb it, . for the circumstances of cases really differ very little. I venture to say that such a standard would be gladly adopted by the Judges in the large majority of cases, and. we should thus obtain something like uniformity of sentences, whereas, under the presenii system, we may be said to secni-e want of uniformity, every Judge being left to form his own opinion on the heinous- ness of the crime. When I first had the honour of a seat on the common law bench I was struck with the desirability of such a standard, which might be obtained either by Act of Parliament, by an Order in Council, or even by agreement among the Judges themselves. There would be no reason why it should not be altered from time to time, as the prevalence of a particular crime or other circumstances might render advisable. Tlie Lord OhanceUoi' (Hatherley) added : My noble and learned friend referred, and there I am more disposed to concur with him, to the different temperament of those who are called upon to pronounce sentence on criminals. There are seventeen Judges, the chairmen of quarter sessions, recorders, and others. It would be preposterous, however, to award a strict sentence in every case without the least regard to Principles of Punishment. iii the particular oiroumatanoes, and if this tribunal is to revise sentences, of how many persons is it to consist, and how are yoU' to secure unanimity ? How are you to gauge the feelings . of those who are called upon to act? The legal portion of the tribunal might possibly lean in one direction and the lay element in another, and it would be difficult to secure a unanimous opinion. The complaint is not new, although it has not before been brought so prominently and eloquently to the notice of the public. The fact is familiar to all lawyers who practise in the Criminal Courts and is the frequent subject of comment in legal publications. There is a marked difference in the sentences at the Assizes and Quarter Sessions. If two courts, separated but by a wall, are trying prisoners at the same time, the sen- tences for offences identical in character will frequently differ widely in degree, and it is found to depend upon the accident of a prisoner being tried upon one side or upon the other side of that wall whether he shall be sent to penal servitude or imprisoned for six months. At the instance of the writer, some years ago. Lord Brougham procured a return to be made of the sentences at a certain number of Quarter Sessions and Assizes ; and it appeared that, although the lesser crimes were tried at the former and the greater crimes at the latter, the average number of years of penal servitude and of months of imprisonment inflicted by the former con- siderably exceeded those inflicted by the latter. Some judges hold severity, others leniency, to be the best policy. Accordingly, a crime which one punishes with six months, another will punish with one month, of •imprisonment. From this it is manifest that nothing in the nature of rule governs or even assists the judg- ment in the determination of punishments. They are, 62 iv Principles of Punishment. in faruth, influenced by more or less of caprice, and the Judge would often be perplexed to state specifically the reasons that determine the sentence he pronounces. It is evident from this that they to whom is com- mitted the duty of awarding the punishment of con- victed criminals have no recognised or definite principles to govern or even to guide their judgment. Is it possible to construct such rules ; for, if practicable, they would be most desirable. That a state of anarchy should exist in a matter of so much importance has been for long a subject of regret with those who both observe and think ; and now that public attention has been directed to the question in the Legislature, it has become more than ever necessary that some endeavour should be made to remove, if it be possible, or at least to diminish, this acknowledged defect in the administration of justice. But is it practicable to frame anything in the nature of principles for the guidance of the judgment in the meting out of punishments ? I have put the question to many Judges who have had more experience than myself, and I have found their opinions to differ widely. Some declare the framing of rules to be difficult and the adop- tion of them impossible ; others pronounce positively against the practicability of either making or acting upon rules ; a few have expressed belief that rules might be found, or at least some guiding principles discovered. But aU are of one mind in admitting that such a work would be of the utmost value, if only it coul'd be executed with even partial success. It is in the hope that the design may not be altogether impos- sible and that a first step towards establishing something • like principles of punishment might be found practi- cable on trial that I venture to attempt the subject. Principles of Punishment. v I crave indulgence in the performance of the task because of its novelty. I am not ignorant that Bentham has already treated the subject with exhaustive elabora- tion. But the point of view from which I propose to examine it differs from his. Bentham's treatise is legisla- tive and not administrative. He discourses of what the law ought to be, and not of the manner in which the existing law should be put in force. His great work is the essay of a philosopher maturing a scheme in his own brain for a world of his own imagining, instead of practical instruction how to apply the law as it is to men as they are. That portion of the large question of crime and punishment to which these remarks are directed has been as yet wholly unattempted. I must, however, desire it to be clearly understood that I pretend to nothing more than suggestion. I purpose only an endeavour to propose certaiu principles, or, to speak more correctly, certain considerations, that may assist the judgment in approximating to a just determination in the award of pimishment to criminals. It would be impossible to frame definitions embracing all the infinite variety of circumstances that should be taken into consideration by the Judge, the combina- tions of which, varying in every case, must needs, more or less, modify his decision. The following suggestions, then, must be taken as professing to be nothing more than hints for the guidance of the judgment in determining the measure of punishment according to the nature of the offence to which it is to be applied. More than this would be" impossible at present, if indeed it wUl ever be prac- ticable. An attempt was made by " The Habitual Criminals Act," as originally introduced to Parliament vi Principles of Punishment. and sanctioned by the House of Lords, to limit by law the discretion of Judges in the matter of punishment. It provided that t^o former convictions should in all cases entail a sentence of penal servitude for seven years. Judges, it was contended by its authors, are governed too much by their own feelings, or by fear of unpopularity, and they are more lenient than they should be — or would be, if their judgments were directed by consideration for the suppression of crime rather than by compassion for the suffering of the individual criminal. It would be a relief to them to remove this discretion, and with it the responsibility it entails. But, on the other hand, it was argued that, even if the law were to lay down a hard and fast scale of punishments, it would fail in practice, if opposed to the opinions of the Judge or the prevailing sentiment of the public ; for, rather than convict, with conse- quences to which they are averse, juries would acquit altogether, or judges would invite a conviction for some lesser oSence ; and so, instead of increased stringency, punishment would be practically lessened. Such has been the experience of the unfortunate law that made seven years of penal servitude the minimum sentence after a former conviction. The consequence of this law has been that, instead of a term, of penal servitude appro- priate to the offence. Judges are frequently compelled to pronounce an inadequate sentence of imprisonment. These more rational views prevailed in the Commons, and the discretion of the Judges was restored. But that discretion should not be unlimited. It should be exercised according to some rule, and with some approach to similarity of action. It ought not to be that, for the same offence, a sentence of penal Principles of Punishment. vii servitude should be pronounced in one court and of imprisonment for six months in another court. There should be at least an approach to uniformity. This can only be secured by recognising certain general principles, by which the mind may be directed in the formation of its judgment ; and it is in the hope to effect somewhat towards the removal of the existing anarchy, and to bring about more of system in the apportionment of punishment, without too much fet- tering the discretion of the Judge, that I have endeavoured, in the following pages, to construct a rude scheme of the considerations that should present themselves to the Judge's mind. The subject is new, and this sketch of it is merely tentative. Doubtless, if it should prove useful in practice, it will admit of much extension and modification, and that which is now merely suggestive may hereafter shape itself into definite principles, and take the form of a treatise. At present, I pretend to nothing more than to offer to Judges and Magistrates certain hints, that may or may not assist them in the administration of criminal justice. And here, perhaps, I may be allowed to throw out another suggestion, with the same object of bringing about greater uniformity of punishment. It is that they who administer the crimiijal law should hold occasional, or, as I should prefer, periodical conferences upon the subject of punishment. There is a fashion in crime as in other things, and prevalent offences require to be suppressed by exceptional severity. How effective that is was decisively proved in the instance of the crime of garotting, which has almost disappeared under fear of the lash. If the Judges of the Superior Courts viii Principles of Punishment. and the Ohairmen of Quarter Sessions were to meet once a year, and review th.e question of crime and punishment, and come to some general resolutions as to tlie nature of the treatment of the various offences then most prevalent, their combined experience could not fail to bring about an approach to uniformity, and prevent the scandals of which Lord Penzance, with too much truth, complained. A like conference of the Stipendiary Magistrates would be no less advantageous in producing unanimity of rule in the infliction of penalties in the large sum- mary jurisdiction exercised by them. Their resolves would doubtless regulate, to a considerable extent, the decisions of the unpaid magistracy. In treating this subject, it is necessary to keep clearly before the mind what are the objects^ of punishment. These are — First. To deter the criminal from again offending. Secondly. By the example of his suffering to deter others from offending in the like manner. The law has wisely given to the Judges by whom it is administered a very wide discretion as to the precise degree of punishment in the particular case which, in their judgment, will best accomplish this double object. Although assigning a certain kind of penalty to each kind of offence, the Judge is empowered to vary almost indefinitely the degree of that penalty. Prescribing in all cases a maximum of punishment, in a few cases only is a minimum prescribed ; and there is now an admirable provision in the Criminal Law Consolidation Acts (24 & 25 Vict. c. 96, s. 117), which empowers the Judge, in indictable misdemeanors, in Heu of punish- ment, to fine the offender, and require him to enter into Princtples of Funishment. ix his own recognisances and find sureties, both or either, for keeping the peace. Perhaps the most convenient plan in treating of this subject, for which I have no precedent, will be to pursue the course of thought naturally followed by the mind • of the Judge, when determining the amount of punish- ment to be awarded after a conviction, and see what considerations should weigh witb him in forming his conclusion. The first matter for deliberation, in considering the measure of punishment, is the character of the crime; the second, the character of the criminal. I. THE OHAEAOTEE OF THE CRIME. The character of crimes varies widely. I do not here refer to the general character of the offence in the scale of the Criminal Code, but to the special features of the particular instance of it then under consideration ; and these may be conveniently classed in a catalogue, that cannot pretend to be exhaustive, but is merely a rude outline to assist the inquiry and the memory. 1. Ceimes ot Wantonness. 2. Occasional Ceimes and Ceimbs peom Temptation. 3. Cbimbs involving Beeaoh op Teust. i. Ceimes op Feaud. 5. Ceimes op Passion. 6. Ceimes op Violence. 7. Ceimes op Beutality and Ceueltt. 8. Peevalent Ceimes. To each of these it will, I think, be practicable to apply some general rules for guidance, to assist, but not to control, the judgment. For, after everything like b3 X Principles of Punishment. rule is considered, mucli will commonly remain to exercise the further discretion of the Judge, growing out of the special ■ circumstances of the case, which cannot be anticipatSd nor provided for. 1, Oeimes op Wantonness. To this category I refer all those offences that are the result rather of inconsiderate folly than of positive wickedness, and of which the young and thoughtless are commonly the perpetrators. Damage done to per- sons and property by the misuse of dangerous weapons, by stone-throwing, by indulgence in what are called " larks " (provided they have not in them the in- gredient of " malice "), belong to this class. How to deal with them satisfactorily has been always a problem for Judges and Magistrates. A gaol, with its formidable consequences upon the future reputation of those who have been once consigned to it, is a punish- ment which a reflecting man would be most reluctant to inflict upon a youth just entering upon the struggle of life, and to whom it is certain degradation and possible ruin, especially as the offence is not one that necessarily implies moral abasement. The appropriate penalty for such offences, in the case of boys, is that which a father would inflict — a whipping. The remem- bered smart would be far more effective in reforming bad habits than any amount" of imprisonment, and the fear of the like suffering would more effectually deter others fronj indulgence in the same follies than mere confinement for a few days or weeks. If a youth guilty of an offence of this nature were ordered to be taken to the nearest police-station, there to receive a limited number of strokes with a birch, and then sent Principles of Punishment. xi tome smarting and crying, the effect upon himself and the example to others would be infinitely more deterrent than the fine or imprisonment which the existing law imposes. But, until the law is amended by some provision to this effect, in cases where the depravity does not appear to have been great, and the offender is young, the better course will be to infoi-m him of his, peril, to warn him of the certain consequences of repetition of his offence, and discharge him on his own recognisances to come up for judgment when called . upon. Should this leniency fail, as seldom it has been found to do, the offender can be punished with justly increased severity, and in the meanwhile the consciousness that he is on his good behaviour cannot but have a most wholesome effect upon his conduct. 2. Occasional Ceimeb akd Cbdies feom Temptation. By these I intend that extensive class of crimes to which persons are prompted by sudden impulse rather than by deliberate design, being induced, for the most part, by facility for procuring the object whose presence prompted the desire to possess it. To this category belong a considerable proportion of the petty larcenies committed by persons who are not habitual criminals. Usually the object is to gratify a passion for liquor ; sometimes it is to satisfy the cravings of hunger ; that, however, being the cause with but a small fraction of the whole body of criminals. To this class belong the petty plunderers, who steal articles of small value, from no motive that can be traced, but doubtless through some insane enjoyment in the exercise of fur- tiveness, rather than from love of acquisition ; a passion which is as difficult of resistance by them as is that of xii JPrinciples of Punishment. the drunkard for the draught which as he drinks he knows wUl destroy him. When satisfied that the offence was of sudden temp- tation, and not committed of malice aforethought, and especially if it is a first offence, the punishment should be slight and more by way of warning than of penalty. But the convict should be informed that a second offence will be treated much more severely. In many of these cases the same course of discharge on recognizance to come up for judgment when called upon might be adopted with great advantage, especially where the convict is young or has borne a good character previously. It is more diflScult to determine how to deal with petty plunderers. If really the subjects of disease, the right place for them is an asylum. But if they have fallen into a confirmed habit of picking and stealing, what can be done with them? They are simply incorrigible rogues. The best course, alike for them- selves and for the public, would be to treat them aa persons incapable of self-control, and keep them under restraint for a very long period of time. But public opinion would not endure the infliction of seven years of penal servitude for stealing a pewter pot, unless the thief was known to be a professional criminal, and therefore the Judge is compelled to repeat the often repeated sentence of imprisonment, with absolute cer- tainty that, in a month after his discharge from gaol, the convict will be plundering again. It would be well if, in such cases of persistent crime, the law would permit a trial to be made of whipping, which, doubt- less, would be more dreaded by criminals of this class than mere imprisonment, that seems to have no terror Principles of Punishment. xiii for them ; on tlie contrary, I much doubt if they do not rather like the periodical change in their way of life. 3. CeIMBS INYOLVIN& Beeaoh OF Tbubt. Offences committed by servants, and others in fldnciary capacities, who avail themselves of the confidence they have obtained to facilitate the commission of the crime, involve a double wrong — adding breach of trust to larceny — and punishment should be meted out accord- ingly. The most frequent form of this class of offences is embezzlement, and it is commonly alleged, in ex- tenuation of the crime, that the temptation is great, by reason of the possession of money, for which the servant has some pressing need, and which he had hoped to repay. As a matter of fact, in the vast majority of cases, the criminal hoped that the loss would not be discovered, and was not self-deceived by any distant notion of recoupment. But in any case it is an offence of much higher degree in criminality than either of the two preceding classes; Moreover, the repose of confidence in servants is so unavoidable arid 80 universal that it is absolutely necessary, for the sake of example, to mark the distinction between this and the lesser crime of simple larceny. Where a servant has been concerned in a positive theft of the things committed to his charge, either personally or by aiding others, the offence is greater even than that of embezzlement, for there is less temptation, and it implies more delibera- tion and art, and should be treated accordingly. 4. Ceimes of Feaot). Crimes that savour of fraud call for much greater severity of punishment than either of the classes of xiv Principles of Punishment. crime yet considered ; for this reason, that they are crimes which in their nature imply deliberation and the exercise of a certain amount of skill, and therefore preclude the mitigatory elements of sudden temptation or ignorance. There is another, and still more potent, reason for treating them with severity. Such treatment is the most likely to operate with peculiar force in these eases, inasmuch as they are crimes of calculation, and the risk of the punishment enters directly into the consideration of the intending criminal when projecting his scheme. And if severity in these cases operates powerfully to deter from the crime, it is still more efficient by way of example. In these days of extended education, crimes of fraud are substituted more and more for crimes of violence. Education does not diminish the amount of crime to any marked extent, it operates mainly to change the direction of crime. The man who desires to procure self- indulgences without working for them — which is the short but truthful definition of a thief — if educated, pre- fers the surer as well as safer practice of fraud to the personal danger of robbery ; and, as education extends, this altered form of the crimes that may be classed under the general name of theft will certaiiily prevail more and more, and should be dealt with accordingly. These considerations do not appear to have sufficiently pre- sented themselves either to the Legislature or to the Judges in the apportioning of punishment to crimes of fraud. Unfortunately, the law has affixed to these crimes the mitigated title of " misdemeanors," and assigned to them a limit of punishment less than to the offences to which it has chosen to give the name of "felony;" although, in truth and fact, the crimes of Principles of Punishment. xv fraud are the most noxious, not only as possessing more of the elements that constitute, criminality, but as being more offensive to the community and more difficult to be guarded against by the public and by individuals. In this respect the law itself requires alteration, and fraud should be put into its proper place in the catalogue of crime, as it prevails under the con- ditions of modern society. But the Judges, in admi- nistering the existing law, might do much towards bringing about the required change by more severe punishment in all oases wherein there appears to have been a deliberate design to plunder by a fraud, in- creasing it in proportion to the amount of skilful planning and calculation employed. If the frauds have been systeinatic, long continued, and numerous, this also should weigh heavily in the judgment ; and although the conviction be for one or two fraudulent acts only, the sum of aU the wrongs done or designed should be taken into account, and the punishment increased in proportion to the artfulness of the offender, as proved by his success and the extent to which he has practised his frauds. •4. Crimes of Passion. In this class I place all the crimes that are the con- sequence of some sudden excitement of the passions, and which do not savour of malice aforethought, or were not committed with deliberation. The greater portion of these offences fall under the next division also — that of Grimes of Violence — ^but this latter includes much that would not come within the present class, and, there- fore, the two are separately considered. Manifestly these offences are wanting in that most xvi Principles of Punishment. important ingredient in the estimate of taiminality— deliberate design and calculated chances. It is like- wise doubtful if punishment has much influence either in reforming the criininal or in deterring others. The temporary mastery of passion over reason, which ex- tenuates the crime, ia itself excludes the element of design, and therefore punishment should be as nearly as possible preventive. But the difficulty in this case, as in so many others that present themselves in considering the question of crime and punishment, arises from this, — that the injury done is not a measure of the moral guUt. For instance, a man in a momentary fit of passion strikes another with a knife that chanced to be in his hand at the time of the provocation received. Fortunately he outs where the wound is harmless ; but, had the knife gone to the right or left it would have severed an artery and caused death. The motive, and therefore the moral guUt, of the assailant, would be the same in either case ; but the law makes a necessary distinction which those who administer it are bound to observe. A very different measure of punishment is meted out accordingly as the wound had been harmless or destructive. But I must confess myself at a loss for an intelligible principle by which the proper extent of punishment should be determined in such a case. The lesson to be taught is, that if a man uses a weapon for an unlawful purpose, he must take the consequences that may possibly result from indulgence of passion. It is undoubtedly essential to the safety of society that passion should not be accounted as an excuse for a great injury done .to another, and that this should be publicly notified by the sentence ; but it has often occurred to me that after sentence there should be a classification Principles of Punishment. x*ii of criminals ; that the carrying out of that sentence should be with reference to the moral guilt of the offenders ; and that crimes of passion, which do not necessarily imply moral depravity, should not be treated in the same manner as crimes which, in their very nature, involve moral degradation. The object of punishment in the one case is restraint and example ; the objects in the other case are seclusion from evil associations and habits, example, and reformation. Where no serious wrong is done to the injured party by a crime of passion, the fact of its having been unpre- meditated may fairly be taken into consideration, and the punishment modified accordingly. 5. Cbimes op Violence. The first object of legislation is personal security, and therefore severe punishment is always and everywhere affixed to this class of crime. Some of the offences that would properly belong to this division, as being crimes of violence, would be trans- ferred, when prompted by passion, to the class of crimes last treated of, and therefore are excepted from this division, which relates only to such acts as cannot plead the mitigation of sudden provocation. And in legal as in moral estimation, the crimes of this class range from comparatively slight degrees of turpi- tude to the greatest of all crimes — deliberate murder. I have used the term " comparatively slight " for want of a better phrase to express my meaning. But no crime of violence, not having the excuse, such as it is, of sudden passion, can be treated otherwise than as a grievous offence. The security of person is the fore- most purpose for which law exists; the security of xviii Principles of Pwmshmeni. property is but tlie second. The employment of force to obtain some object of desire, or to avenge some real or supposed wrong, is an open defiance of authority that calls for severe punishment, apart from the extent of the injury done to the object of that violence. Multiplied, it would destroy society itself. The first item in the estimate of punishment in such cases is the degree in which the character of the crime shakes the security of the community. The second is the motive with which the injury was done. This is an ingre- dient in the offence to be considered quite apart from the amount of injury actually done ; a slight blow in- flicted with an intent to murder is more criminal than a severe blow inflicted with design only to commit a common assault. The third ingredient in -the measure of punishment of a crime of violence is the injury actually done. A great hurt would aggravate the offence, though the intent was to inflict only a small hurt, he who resorts to illegal violence being rightly made responsible for the consequences of his wrongful act, even although those consequences were not intended. But though the actual injury not having bfeen intended cannot be received as an excuse, it may fairly be considered in i3Qitigation of punishment. Where a crime of violence is committed in the course of committing another crime, there is a rule which the , Judge may take for his guidance in determining the - sentence. He should bear in mind that he is to punish two offences — the original offence and the crime of violence that has been superadded. The proper sentence may not be in all cases the dcjubled punishment, but the double wrong should be taken as the amount ex debito Principles of Punishment. xix justiticB, from wHoli deduction may be made according to tlie special circumstances that modify guilt. If the act of violence was premeditated, or instigated by pre-existing motive of vengeance, jealousy, hatred, or other malignity, it should be punished with a severity proportioned as far as possible to the nature and extent of the evil passion that prompted it, and especially in reference to the time during which the design appears to have been cherished. The moral turpitude of crime increases immensely with the period during which it has been hatching in the mind of the criminal, because his opportunities for self-control and repentance have been greater, and the punishment sltould mark this dis- tinction to himself as to others. Crimes of violence committed against the law itself, in the persons of those by whom it is administered, demand exemplary punishment, because they endanger the safety of the entire community. The particular wrong is to the individual injured, but the greater wrong is to the whole public ; and although but one policeman's head has been broken, the security of all men's heads has been shaken by that act. Hence it is that assaults upon constables in the execution of their duty are rightly held, in all civilised lands, to be offences of very grave njiagnitude, calling for condign punishment, in order to deter, by example, those who might be inclined to offend in the like manner, and thus to throw around the officers of justice the utmost protection possible in the courageous performance of their diflScult and dangerous duties. Punishment in such cases is to be measured, first, by the injury done to the individual; to which should be invariably super- added, second, the further punishment due for the XX Principles of Punishment. injury done to the public by the attempt to deter its oflScers from protecting it; and third, for the defiance shown to the law. If these ingredients in the crime were taken- properly iato account, brutal assaults upon policemen would be more severely dealt with by Judges and Magistrates than is their practice now, and the result would certainly be seen in a marked diminu- tion of this increasing crime.. Perhaps it would be a just and wholesome rule in all such oases to double the punishment that would have been inflicted for a similar unprovoked assault upon a private person. If the violence is further complicated with a rescue, or attempted rescue, of a prisoner from actual custody, the crime is yet more aggravated, and demands the punishment of a triple wrong — viz., first, the injury to the man ; second, the injury to the public through its protectors ; third, the defiance of the law by the rescue of its prisoner. Crimes of violence committed from mere laivlessness, such as those by which " the roughs,'' as they are termed, with growing audacity have made many parts of the metropolis and of our great towns unsafe for the well-dressed and well-behaved, surely require to be visited with more severity of punishment than they have yet received. From no crime would offenders be more readily deterred by example — ^none is so easily encouraged by impunity. In crimes for gain, the criminal stakes the chances of success against the chances of failure and punishment ; but ia crimes of mere lawless- ness there is no hope of profit to be staked against the diance of pain ; and even the brutal natures who indulge in this offence are conscious that they may pay too dearly for their amusement. The considerations that should regulate the judgment Principles of Punishment. xxi in ttis class of crimes, wliere tlie violence was in pur- suance of another crime, are : First. The nature of the crime in pursuit of which the violence was committed. Second. The motive with which the violence was done. Third. The extent and nature of the injury done to the person subjected to that violence. The other crimes of violence, in which the violence was the primary object of the criminal, are sufficiently stated above and need not recapitulation. 7. Oeimes op Oeuelty and Beutalitt. I place these in a separate class from crimes of violence, because, although they involve violence, they have a further ingredient of criminality that demands additional punishment. The essence of these offences is the intention to inflict pain, too commonly from a horrible pleasure taken in the infliction, but sometimes from mere brutal thoughtlessness and disregard for the feelings of others. For this class of offences the obviously appro- priate punishment would be the infliction of bodily pain upon the criminal, as nearly resembling the nature of the pain inflicted by him upon his victim as circum- stances reasonably permit. But to this conception of punishment our law has not yet advanced and Judges can deal with crimes of cruelty only as the present imperfect law directs. As cruelty is not punishable with flogging, and brutality is not permitted to be treated as brutes can only be governed, by fear of pain, the sentence in such cases should at least indi- cate by its severity the public abhorrence of the crime. Never should it be condoned by a pecuniary penalt}', xxii Principles of Punishment. which is appropriate only to offences that savour more of the nature of civil wrongs than of crimes ; but to the punishment tl^at would be awarded to the act of violence, a very considerable measure should be added for the inhumanity of the motives that prompted it. 8. Pbevalent Ceimes. There is a fashion in crime as in other things. Judges and Magistrates are continually reminded, by the calendars at the Assizes and Quarter Sessions, that not only are certain offences preferred by the criminal class at certain seasons of the year, but that there is among that class a strong tendency to imitation, inso- much that any crime greatly talked about, or made prominent in the newspapers, forthwith becomes the fashion among the criminal class. The rationale of this was weU illustrated to me some years ago at Exeter. The crime of arson had prevailed to an alarming extent in Devonshire, without any assignable motive of dis- content or vengeance. I was curious to learn the cause of this, and when defending some of the criminals, all of whom were fai-m servants and the majority of them young girls and boys, I requested them to teU me frankly what induced them to the act. Similar answers were given by aU. " I heard talk of the fires about, and then I wanted to try and see if I could'nt make one too, and it come into my mind tiU I couldn't help doing it." This was a real monomania in a non-criminal class ; but it reveals the process by which fashion in crimes is created. The attention of the criminal is strongly directed to certain crimes by frequent mention of them in the newspapers ; the thought of them occupies and Principles of Punishmenl. xxiii haunts the whole mind, until at length there is an irrepressible impulse to act out the thought. Many are made criminals by reading about crimes in publications like the Police Gazette and other periodicals that supply what is truthfully called " Thieves' Literature ; " and hence it is that the calendars usually show a marked fashion, for the time being, in favour of some particular crime or crimes. The prevalence of certain crimes is, therefore, an, important ingredient in the measure of punishment, and entitled to quite as much consideration as the other ingredients named above. Experience proves that such fashions in crime are speedily and effectually controlled by visiting them with special punishment. Being the con- sequence of example, they are influenced by example ; and, therefore, exceptional severity, declared by the Judges to be designed because of the prevalence of the crime in question, wiU be found rarely to fail in suppressing it, or at least in restoring it to its normal quantity. So much for the treatment of crimes. I now come to the considerations in relation to the circumstances that affect the ceiminal, which should more or less sway the judgment in determining the measure of punishment. n. THE OHAEAOTEE OF THE CEIMINAL. For this purpose of punishment. Criminals may be divided into three great classes : — 1. The Oooasional Ceminal. 2. The Habitual Obiminal. 3. The ' Peopebsional Ceiminal. Each of these classes requires different treatment. It win be observed that I have distinguished the xxiv Principles of Punishment. " Habitual " from the " Professional " criminal, although no such distinction is recognised by the law, all offenders belonging to these two classes being by the statute placed in one category under the title of " Habitual Criminals," and, as such, subjected to the same treat- ment. Having a decided opinion — the result both of expe- rience and reflection — that there is a definite distinction between these two classes of criminals, requiring a difference in the award of punishment, which the Judge may properly exercise if he should approve the views here set forth, I venture to suggest the distinction that has so strongly presented itself to my own mind. The test of being an Habitual Criminal, as recognised by the statute, is that he ha;S been previously convicted ; and if a criminal has been so convicted, he is there- upon deemed to be an Habitual Criminal and treated accordingly. I dispute both of these presumptions. With all respect for the authorities, I submit that previous con- viction is neither sufficient, nor even presumptive, proof that the convict is an Habitual Criminal within the intention of the law ; that a former conviction is not a sufficient test of " Habitual " crime, and that the punish- ment which was intended to apply to those who make a business of crime is, by this rude classification, practically extended to many for whom it was not designed and to whose cases it is in fact inappropriate. Having cast about for a fit name by which to desig- nate the class to whom " The Habitual Criminals Act " was intended to apply, I can find nothing better than the term " Professional Criminal," which carries to all minds the precise conception it is 'intended to Principles of Punishment. xxv convey. The professional criminal is one who makes crime Ms calling ; who is educated for it and lives by it, precisely as the doctor or the lawyer lives by his calling. He and his pursuits are as commonly known to the police as those of any apothecary with a blue light over the door. He lives in recognised and well- defined thieves' quarters, precisely as do the French in the neighbourhood of Leicester-square or the Solicitors in Bedford-row. The entire body of the professional criminals could be caught and imprisoned in one morn- ing. A class so definite and so readily identified might well be made the subject of distinct legislation, and it is greatly to be regretted that they should have been in any manner confused with another class with which they have but little in common. Professional criminals are concentrated in the metro- polis and a few of the largest cities and towns. The rest of the country knows little of them, save when they make occasional predatory raids into the provinces for business, pleasure, or health, or for all of these together. But in the towns, outside the quarters of the professional criminals, and everywhere in the country, are a considerable number of criminals who, although they may have been previously convicted of petty thefts once, tvrice, or even many times, are nevertheless not professional thieves — that is to say, they do not make plunder their business, but habitually earn a livelihood by work, and are only weak to resist temptation, especially when prompted by a desire for drink or other self-indulgence. To treat such offenders as we would, or should, treat professional criminals is an abuse of words, an ignoring of facts, and, were Judges to sanction it, would certainly prove a great in- xxvi Principles of Punishment. justice and bring tlie criminal law into not undeserved disrepute. For these reasons I trust to have satisfied the reader, that, for the purpose of punishment, it has been rightly recommended to him to recognise three classes of criminals, instead of two, as proposed by the existing law. 1. The Oooabional Oeiminai. By this term— not a very satisfactory one, I must own, but adopted for lack of a better — I refer to a class which embraces aU those offenders who appear to be such from sudden impulse or great temptation of need or of opportunity ; who are not criminals by calling, and whose crimes do not exhibit great moral depravity, or any of those features of aggravation which have been considered in the foregoing review of the various characters of crimes. I cannot too earnestly urge leniency in the treatment of offenders of this class. A first offence should always be looked upon with pity, as possibly a lapse from virtue, the result more of weakness than of wicked- ness. As in such a case repentance and reformation are always possible, punishment should be rather by way of warning than of penalty. Opportunity should be given to the criminal to redeem his lost reputationj but with emphatic warning that mercy wiU not prevail a second time, and that if he sins again in like manner his pimishment will be doubly severe. In many of such cases the Judge might beneficially adopt the course of simply putting the convict under recognisances to come up for judgment when called upon, notifying to him that, if he continues in good behaviour, he will hear nothing more of the matter ; but that, if he again offends against Principles of Punishment. xxvii tlie criminal law in any manner, lie will be brought up for judgment and punished with the greater severity for the offence of which he has been now convicted. The obvious advantage of this course is, that it operates more powerfully than even police supervision to keep the convict in good behaviour. The leniency thus shown to him rarely fails to have some influence in restraining him from relapse into crime. Even if it do not induce reform, the knowledge that if he offends in anything he will be punished on a conviction already secured, with none of the chances of escape that attend a new prosecution, will certainly operate as the most powerful check upon him when tempted again to err. 2. The Habitual Oeiminal. This class of criminals, defining it as above, is by far the most perplexing for those who administer criminal justice. The hard and fast line proposed as a test by "The Habitual Criminals Act," as sent from the House of Lords, namely, two previous convictions, which were to be followed rigidly in aU cases with seven years of penal servitude, would have wrought such an intolerable wrong that juries would have refused to convict and Judges would have taxed their ingenuity to find holes for escape from a law so indiscriminate in its opera- tion. Judges aiid Justices are continually perplexed how to deal with the petty plunderer, who is not a thief by profession, who works, perhaps, at an honest employment, who would not commit a great crime, but who appears to be unable to resist the temptation of appropriating things of small value that he chances to find unprotected. Penal Servitude for seven years is a punishment so manifestly disproportioned to the nature c2 xxviii Principles of Punishment, of the crime and the character of the criminal, that it would shock the' public sense of justice and bring odium upon the law itself. Yet have short imprison- ments been tried upon him in vain. It is certain that, as soon as he is released, after a confinement of two or three months, the old habit will be resumed. The real remedy for such an offender, who cannot exercise sufficient self-control to keep his hands from picking and stealing, would be to place him under restraint for a long term, and compel him to work ; treating him, after a limited probation, not as a convict, but as a labourer for the public, under the control of the servants of the public. But until a more rational system of punishment is provided by the Legislature, Judges and Magistrates can only administer the law as it is ; and the best chance of cure at present provided is an imprisonment long enough to loosen, if not to sever, evil associations, to disturb old, and to implant new, habits. Penal servitude, as contemplated by the original bill, would probably be a better punishment in many of such cases than mere imprisonment ; but the nature and uses of such a treatment of habitual offenders are not sufficiently understood by the public to prevent the shout of indignation that would be raised if a criminal were sentenced to seven years of penal servitude (that being the least term which the statute permits to be awarded in case of a former conviction) for some petty theft, even although the prisoner had been twice, thrice, or more often still, previously convicted of similar petty thefts and suffered many short terms of imprisonment, but is not a professional criminal. Principles of Punishment. xxix 3. The PEorEssiONAL Obiminal. There ouglit to be very little difficulty in dealing witli this class of criminals. Educated to crime, living by crime, they commit crime systematically, deliberately, with malice aforethought, calculating oarefuUy the pro- portion which the chance of profit bears to the risk of detection, capture, trial, conviction, and punishment — all of which are taken into the aocoimt. A Professional Criminal is never, or very rarely, reformed. In his mind crime is no sin. No seK-reproach follows him; no conscience pricks him. It is his business. He fights with justice and its officers as his natural enemies, whom to defy, to evade, to defeat, is a boast and not a shame. He weighs the value of his prize against the risk of penal servitude, and if he is caught calls it his ill-luck and hopes for better luck next time. He calcu- lates on spending a certain proportion of his life in a gaol, and adapts himself to that condition, making his prison residences as comfortable as he can by good behaviour while there, and compensating for his forced temporary abstinence by revelling in every sensual pleasure when he is again at large. Eeformation with such a man is hopeless. Punishment, at least, such as it is now, does not deter him, because it is his business to hazard it — precisely as the soldier does not shrink from the service, although he knows that he must face the chance of wounds and death. It is his profession to risk his Kfe, and he does it. It is the profession of the thief to risk his liberty and he does it. When, therefore, the Judge is satisfied that the prisoner is a professional criminal the course is plain. XXX Principles of Punishment. Mercy is wasted on sucli a man ; leniency is of no advantage to the convict and it is an injustice to the community. The effect of a short imprisonment is merely to send back the plunderer to prey upon society for a time, to be again returned to the dock after he has run up a new score of offences and probably educated a new race of thieves to assist and to succeed him in his business. Penal servitude should be in- flexibly awarded to a convict of this class, the object of that punishment being to restrain him for the longest possible period from the exercise of his nefarious calling, and to make it more difficult for him to follow it after his release ; for we may be assured that, come when it will, his profession of preying upon the public will be resumed with doubled zest after a long abstinence. The only care required in these oases is that the Judge should be assured by due inquiry that the prisoner is really a "professional" criminal. This may be ascertained in two ways ; first, by the character of the offence itself ; secondly, by inquiry from the police. 1. By the nature of the offence. Certain crimes require an education for their successful accomplishment and therefore the presumption is that the practitioner of them is a professional criminal. Such are, burglary effected with burglarious instruments, or in any manner showing the exercise of a considerable degree of skill ; pocket picking, dexterously done, with the aid of accomplices, or where the coat worn has false pockets, or upon the prisoner being found the scissors com- monly used in the commission of that crime ; or his hands showing by their softness .that they have not been , employed in manual labour ; or, the place where done. Principles of Punishment, xxxi as at a railway station, a theatre, a race, a fair, or otter locality wliere professional pickpockets usually ply their trade ; tlie possession of skeleton keys, picklocks, and instruments used for housebreaking. Indeed, wheresoever there is a conspiracy of two or more for the purpose of committing the offence, the reasonable presumption is that the convict is a profes- ' sional criminal, at least sufSoiently to call upon him to show, by some satisfactory evidence, that he has been in honest work ; that he is not, as he appears to be, living by crime, but is only an occasional criminal. Eeceivers of stolen goods especially belong to this class ; they are not merely criminal themselves, but they tempt others into crime. If, upon inquiry, the Judge is satisfied that the convict is an habitual receiver of stolen goods, penal servitude should be inflexibly awarded. 2. If none of these indicia appear, the police of the district where the prisoner dwells, or which he frequents, should be asked as to their knowledge of him. Does he associate with thieves ? Has he any honest calling ? Who was his employer, if any? Such questions will probably elicit sufficient of his past history to enable the Judge to form a safe judgment whether the convict is a professional criminal. But where such an inquiry is made, justice to the prisoner requires that he should be permitted, and indeed invited, to answer the facts stated against him by any explanation he can offer, personally or by witnesses, and if he refers to known persons in refutation of the charge of being a professional criminal, further inquiry should be made by the police before his sentence is determined — and judgment should be deferred for that purpose. In reference to this class of criminals, I ventured to sxxii Principles of Punishment. recommend tliat the indictment should charge the prisoner with being a professional criminal, precisely as it now charges a former conviction ; that, after con- viction for the particular offence, the jury should try the charge of his being a professional criminal, precisely as it now tries the question of a' former conviction ; that the jury should hear the proof of this charge by the prosecution, and also the prisoner's answer to it, and find a verdict thereupon, and that the punishment affixed to the crime of which he has been convicted should then be increased accordingly, from a penalty, designed mainly to operate as a warning, to one that is designed to operate by way of long restraint. The reasons I have ventured here to urge for the treatment of professional criminals with exceptional severity, even on a first conviction, with the avowed object of excluding them for a long term of penal servi- tude from the community which they both plunder and corrupt, have received a remarkable confirmation in the very instructive report of Colonel Henderson on "Metropolitan Crime," issued since the above remarks were written. I find the substance of that report so well condensed in an article in the Quarterly Review, that I extract the passages relating to the subject of professional criminals : That orimlnals pursue their trade as a regular oalliug is clear from the number of reoommittals every year. The thief who has been once in gaol is almost certain to reappear there. He is not deterred by the so-called " punishment " of the model prison, in which he enjoys food, warmth, and clothing, provided for him at the public expense. So he is no sooner set free than he at once recommences the practice of his vocation. The police had captured him before and handed him over to justice ; but after a short term of absence justice restores him to society again. Frindples of Punishment. xxxiii Another round of thefts or borglarles follows ; the police catch him again ; and again he is handed over to justice, to travel in the same circle of imprisonment, restoration to society, and renewal of burglary and crime These receivers of stolen goods are among the greatest eu- couragers of crime. They are not only as bad as the thief, but worse. They educate, cherish, and maintain the criminal. The young thief begins by stealing small things from stalls, from shops, from warehouses; or he first picks pockets in a small way, proceeding from handkerchiefs to watches and purses; always finding a ready customer for his articles in the receiver of stolen goods. And when a skilled thief gets out of gaol, without means, the receiver will readily advance him 50Z. at a time, until he sees his way to an extensive shoplifting, from which he not only gets his advance returned, but a great deal more in the value of the stolen goods. The number of detected receivers of stolen goods committed for trial in the metropolitan district for the five years ending December, 1868, was 642; being an increase of 38 on the preceding period The police acknowledge, for it cannot be denied, that there is a large class of known thieves abroad — men skilled in burglary, who pursue it as a regular calling. But are the police responsible for these men being at liberty to pursue their nefarious industry ? " Why don't the police catch the burglars ? " ask the public. The police reply that they have caught these habitual criminals again and again, and handed them over to " justice ; " but that justice has again and again let them loose to rob and plunder as before. " Why do not the police catch the portico thieves ?" The reason is that these portico thieves, as well as the skilled burglars, are all old, trained, and repeatedly caught and convicted criminals, who, after each successive capture by the pohce, came out of gaol with an increased degree of cunning and circumspection, rendering them not only more dangerous as thieves but more artful in evading detection and apprehension. The question which should be asked is, not " Why do not the police catch the burglars?" but "Why is it that confirmed and habitual criminals already repeatedly caught and convicted are let loose upon society to pursue their known profession of plunder ? " The total number of criminals committed to prison through- out England and Wales, in 1868, was 158,480. Of these, 21,189 c3 xxxiv Principles of Punishment. had been in gaol oiioe before; 9263 twice; 5213 three times; 3557 four times ; 24:38 five times ; 2933 seven times and above five ; 2427 ten times and above seven ; while 4488 had been in prison more than ten times ! The worst thieves and burglars were those who had been in gaol the oftenest. Not fewer than 1343 were re-oommitted in 1868, who, on previous convictions, had been sentenced to transportation or penal servitude because of burglary, in some cases accompanied by violence; and yet they were again found at large, committing the same crimes, and were again apprehended by the police, and again handed over to justice as before. It is the same as regards the worst criminal class of the metropolis. Of the 21,498 criminals convicted in metropolitan Courts during the seven years ending 1868, 2628 were recog- nised* as having been twice before in custody for felony ; 391 had been three times ; 70 had been four times ; and 16 had been five times and upwards. Yet the number recognised probably forms but a small proportion of those who have undergone pre- vious imprisonments. Many old and habitual criminals are not recognised at all, because their previous convictions occurred in other police districts, from which they removed because already too well known there ; and even in the case of such as have before undergone sentences in metropolitan prisons, identifica- tion is not always easy. The old and hardened criminals, with whose faces the police have come to be so familiar, are, without exception, the worst and most dangerous class of the community. They pursue crime as a vocation, and train up young thieves to follow in their footsteps. Hating work, but loving debauchery, their whole time is spent in contriving how to live upon the labour of others. They think of nothing but picking pockets, robbing warehouses, and breaking into dwellings. These are the people who keep society in constant alarm, and nervous women and children in a state of nightly terror. These accomplished scoundrels, who have taken every degree in thieving, and * " To meet the risk of being recoguised and its consequences " (says-the Ordinary of Newgate, in his recent letter to Lord Kimberley) " old offenders change their names, age, trade, religion, condition, and the particulars of their education,— in fact, every oiroumstanoe ; and many eld offenders, notwithstanding the great aptitude of Sessions otaoers for their duties by these tricks escape perhaps not recognition, but legal idaUiJkation." ' Principles of Punishment. xxxv advanced from area-sneaking to shoplifting, until they have graduated as first-class oraokamen, and are at perpetual war with the honest part of society. They have been repeatedly apprehended by the police, and as repeatedly set at liberty; and when another robbery occurs, because the police do not immediately succeed in apprehending them — skilled as they have become in the art of evading detection — loud outcries are raised of " Where are the police ? " It is not the police who are really in fault, so much as that tenderness for scoundrelism of all kinds that has become one of the pervading follies of our time. Modern philanthropy has so busied itself in ameliorating the condition of criminals that the condition of the thief has come to be almost more tolerable than that of the honest working man. We have abolished the severer punishments, done away with transportation, and pro- vided comfortable houses of detention, where convicted criminals are better housed, clothed, and fed than the average of city mechanics. We do not, as we once did, send our convicts to forced labour on unoccupied land in the colonies, but we get rid of our skilled workmen instead, sending them off in ship- loads abroad, and keeping our thieves and criminals at home. Indeed, it is scarcely to be wondered at if the honest poor man, struggling to keep out of the devil's ranks, and taxed all the while to maintain the scoundrel class, should begin to think, with Dean Swift, that honesty must, after all, be derived from the Greek word onos, signifying an ass. The convicted criminals have now had every consideration shown them ; but the question arises whether some consideration is not also due to those who are robbed, as well as to those who rob — to the wives, daughters, and children of the rate-paying and non-burglar part of the community, who are kept in constant terror by their depredations. It is notorious that the worst crimes of late years have been committed by criminals out of gaol " on licence," who have beien taken red-handed with their tickets-of -leave upon them! Yet the men who are let loose upon society with those tickets-of-leave are almost in- variably the most hardened and habitual criminals. " The principle," says the Ordinary of Newgate, " upon which licences are regulated at present is this : he who can do most work, and who conforms most entirely to the prison rules, is he who xxxvi Principles of Punishment. receives most mitigation of sentence. And who is he? The old criminal, who has served an apprenticeship to the work and discipline of prison My own conviction is, that as a rule (and the exceptions are very rare) mercy is never more un- deservedly shown than to a prisoner who has been previously convicted."* The tenderness for crime which has grown up of late years has become extraordinary. The common working man, who pays his way, and struggles with diflHoulty to keep himself and family out of the workhouse, excites comparatively little interest. Bat, let an atrocious murder be committed, and the whole country is roused to rescue the criminal from the gallows. The burglar may not murder, or intend to murder ; yet he is no less the sworn enemy of society. But we have ceased to hang him ; we no longer flog him at the cart's tail ; we have ceased to transport him ; we make him as comfortable as possible in the model prison we have built for him ; and we even cut short the term of his imprisonment there and let him loose again upon society with his ticket-of-leave to recommence his depredations " Humanity should be exercised " (says the Ordinary of Newgate) " rather for the protection of those who keep the law than for those who choose to break it ; for, in nine cases out of ten, it is choice, and not necessity, that leads to crime." f As regards the repeatedly-convicted and habitual criminals, we hold that something more is needed for the security of society than confining them in well-warmed, well-ventilated, well-regu- lated model prisons for a few years, and then setting them free to pursue their vocation of crime. It used to be said by the advocates of the aboUtion of capital punishment that the worst use that could be made of a man was to hang him ; but surely it is a still worse use to make of a man who has become a hardened and habitual criminaJJ to let him loose upon society, * Beport of tlie Rev. J, E. Lloyd Jones, Ordinary of Newgate, to the Lord Mayor and Aldermen, 1868. t Letter to Lord Kimberley. t In a letter addressed by the Rev. Mr. Lloyd .Tones to Lord Eimberley {11th March, 1869), the following passages are worthy of note : " The greatest difference rests, morally and religiously, between those who are not and those who are habitual criminals. To treat these latter from a humanitarian point of view, securing them from the stigma of their own victoia choice, is inflicting a great wrong upon society, and exposing it to great danger. An habitual criminal moy reform, bu^ with the greatest Principles of Punishment. xxxvii after numerous convictions, to resume his Tocation of plunder and educate others in criminality. Why should incorrigible thieves and irreclaimable burglars be left at large? We shut up lunatics for life because they are dangerous to society ; but liberate confirmed and habitual crimi- nals who are infinitely more dangerous. Such men have clearly forfeited all claim to personal liberty. Their repeated convic- tions have proved them to be a constant source of danger to society. We have ceased to banish them ; the only remedy that remains is continuous incarceration, with compulsory productive labour. Thus only can society be effectually protected from the injuries and terrors which habitual and irreclaimable criminals inflict upon it. These facts and figures speak for themselves. I can but repeat the expression of an earnest hope that they will receive from the Judges by whom the criminal law is administered the thoughtful attention they deserve, and that the result will be a conference and an agree- ment to look upon professional crime as an evil only to be eradicated by treating the professional criminal as a foe to the community, who cannot be reformed or reclaimed, and whom therefore it is both wise and just to deprive of his powers of mischief by a long term of restraint ; and this, not merely for the protection of the public from his depredations, but also for the purpose of making his profession unprofitable and breaking up his haunts, associations, and habits. And inasmuch as, according to the common consent of all who are best informed, he returns invariably from the gaol to his work of plunder and training of youth advantages, he rarely does. I could give your Lordship iustances of habitual crinunals being in good situations, when their former course of life is not known, who have availed themselves of the opportunity to concoct plans for extensive robberies ; for which purpose they have cor- rupted their fellow workmen who, till then, had been honest men I could give your Lordship some valuable information, derived from old convicts sent to prison again for fresh crimes planmd juit b^ore their release, from, information they had received from fresh arrivals at the prison when they had finished their sentence." xxxviii Principles of Punishment. to crime, the "one chance more " that should be given to all other criminals on a first conviction shotild be refused to him, and his career of crime at once stayed for a longer term than any sentence of mere imprison- ment will secure. The single requirement for the adoption of such a policy by the Judge will be to take all needful precau- tion, by careful inquiry, to be assured that the convict is realli/ a professional criminal. If this be denied by the convict, his counsel, or his friends, let sentence be deferred to enable him to produce some satisfactory proof that he is not what he is asserted to be, but has been pursuing some honest employment. And in passing sentence of penal servitude because the convict is deemed to be a professional criminal, the Judge should expressly state his reason for the sentence ; so that if by any mischance there may have been a mistake as to this, application may be made to the Home Office for a mitigation of the sentence, should the convict be enabled to show that he has been wronged by the representations made of his character and pursuits. There yet remain a few other conditions affecting the character of the criminal, which should be weighed in the determination of his sentence. 1. Abe. — ^Every humane Judge or Magistrate must feel extreme reluctance to send a young boy or girl to a prison. The alternative of the reformatory or industrial school presents itself, but these are not adapted for all cases. Young persons thoughtlessly commit occasional acts of crime without being necessarily so morally degraded as to require the discipline of five yeaxs to implant or restore the moral sense. It would Fnnciples of Punishment. xsxix be unjust to tte ratepayers to relieve some parents from the duty of supporting and teaching their children, for whom, therefore, five years in a reformatory, at the public cost, is not the right treatment. A prison, if not in itself a contamination, is a stigma that attaches to a boy for life. How, then, to deal with him ? If his offence is a felony, let bi-m be whipped and dis- charged. But if it be a misdemeanor, or if he is just beyond the age to which whipping is so unwisely restricted, what then shall be done with him ? This is a problem perplexing to Judges and Magistrates, which the Legislature should solve by extending the offences for which, and the age at which, boys might be whipped. As for girls, it is difficult to say how they can be treated. A gaol is ruin ; whipping is impossible ; reformatories are few. Here, as commonly in the case of young persons who do not appear to be hopelessly depraved, discharge on recognisances to appear for judgment when called upon is often the most efficient course, for it holds over them a long and powerful security for good conduct, likely to be far more efficacious in restraint than would have been an imprisonment endured and ended, the shame of it gone, the stain of it remaining — a Cain's mark for life. 2. Sex. — Although the crime may be the same, it is found in practice to be impossible to adjudge the same degree of punishment to women as to men. This difficulty, continually confronting every Judge and Magistrate, is doubtless rather sentimental than rational. No reason can be advanced for a distinction, which nevertheless is made in practice, and neglect to observe which would be severely blamed by the public. Hence it is that, while a third or a fourth xl Principles of Punishment. conviction properly consigns a male thief to penal servi- tude, many more convictions wUl not always suffice to bring down the like sentence upon a woman. This is probably due to the terms " hard labour " or " penal servitude," in which the sentence is conveyed; and although no compunction is felt by any — Judge, spectator, or newspaper — ^at the infliction of labour however hard, or servitude however penal, on an in- corrigible rascal who lives by plunder, all are averse to condemn a female reprobate to punishments so described. Sometimes it is argued that the same sen- tence in terms would be a different punishment in fact, as applied to a man or to a woman. But this is an error, arising from ignorance of the manner in which convict prisons are conducted. " Hard labour " applied to women is such labour only as is adapted to her sex ; and whUe men are set to toilsome tasks, women are employed only in washing, sewing, cooking, and such employments as are suited to them and which honest and industrious women pursue as their ordinary daily duties at home ; so that, in fact, the real punishment of female convicts is not the hardness of the labour but the restraint and discipline to which they are subjected. In aU populous places, and in the metropolis especially, there are many women who spend more of their lives in a gaol than out of it. Surely mercy so called is not mercy in such cases. A short imprisonment is absurd. As soon as the convict is free again she resumes her old habits. For such women the truest mercy is to lock them up, keep them employed, and make the repetition of crime impossible by depriving them of opportunity and temptation. After a fair trial given to short sen- tences of imprisonment, if these fail to secure honesty. Principles of Punishment. xli the rightful sentence will be to remove them from the community on which they systematically prey for so long a time as to afford some chance of breaking, by that disciplined life which penal servitude only can secure, the chain of evil habits and associations by which they are bound to a life of crime. Where it appears that the female convict is an accidental and not an habitual offender, especially if she be young, it is politic as well as merciful to save her from the ruin too often consequent on the moral degradation of a gaol ; and if the employer can be persuaded to taie her again into his service, or if any friend or relative wUl undertake to keep watch upon her, it will be by far the better course to put her upon recognisances to appear for judgment when called upon, with a warning, as before suggested, that if she offends again she will be doubly punished for what she has now done. 3. The Temptation. — Criminality is really measured, in some degree, by the amount of temptation to which the criminal was exposed. It is impossible to lay down any rules by which the various shades of temptation can be defined. It will be enough to remind the Judge that it is an element in the estimate of guilt, to be taken into account in apportioning punishment. 4. If A FiEST, OB EEPEATED, Offenoe. — This, though the last, is perhaps the most important, matter for con- sideration in relation to the criminal ; for he who has had so emphatic a warning as a trial, a conviction, and punishment, can plead none of the excuses which may be properly urged in behalf of first offenders. His crimi- nality is, indeed, very largely increased by the fact that he is an old offender, even although the particular crime with which he is now charged may be in itself xlii Principles of Punishment. a lesser crime in degree tlian that of which, he was formerly convicted. Hence it is that the law properly makes the fact of the committing of a crime after a previous conviction an offence in itself, apart from the particular character of the new offence, and visits it with a severe punishment, in addition to the punish- ment that would have been awarded to the crime of which the offender is now convicted. To so great an extent is this principle recognised by the law that, on a second conviction, the court has no option, if it sen- tences to penal servitude, but to inflict it for seven years. Certainly there never was a law that more entirely defeated its own object. It was designed to increase the severity of punishment for old offenders. By compelling a sentence of not less than seven years of penal servitude, it has forced upon Judges, conscious of the excessive severity of such a sentence in many cases, the alternative of inflicting an inadequate penalty of imprisonment, where the proper sentence would have been three or four years of penal servitude. Thus it has come to pass that, by aiming at excessive severity, the law has practically driven reluctant Judges to excessive leniency. The rules, as nearly as they can be defined, for deal- ing with old offenders may be thus stated : Careful inquiry should be made into the nature of the former charge, the length of time that has since elapsed, what the prisoner has been doing during the interval, — ^if he has been pursuing an honest calling, or otherwise-^in short, if this second offence, as well as the first, wears the complexion rather of accidental or occasional, than of professional or habitual crime. If so it should prove, then one more chance should be Principles of Punishment. xliii given to tlie convict, but of course with a more lengthened sentence of imprisonment and accompanied with emphatic warning that it is the last escape he will have from penal servitude. If, on the other hand, the history of the criminal, before and since the former conviction, or the nature of that or the present crime, indicates that he is a professional criminal, mercy in such case is wasted upon him and is injustice to the community. The truest mercy to both is to remove him for a long period from his old habits, haunts, and associates, and to relieve society from the presence of one who would certainly continue to prey upon it while he is at large, because crime is his profession, because he knows no other calling, and because he prefers it, with all its hazards, to honest industry. Othee Offences. A few other offences, not properly falling within either of the former categories of crime, may be briefly referred to here. They wUl be found, for the most part, to partake of the character of vices, and only to become crimes under certain circumstances. The distinction between crimes and vices is not at all times sufficiently remembered, possibly not always clearly understood, either by the makers or the administrators of the criminal law. Yet it is a most important distinction, for the province of jurisprudence embraces the one and excludes the other. The object of the criminal law is the protection against invasion by others of the personal liberty and property of the subject; — the liberty to live, to think, to act, to employ the faculties of mind and body, and to use our property in any manner we please, provided we sliv Principles of Punishment. do not thereby invade the equal liberty of others to the like free enjoyment of their persons and property. These are the objects of all criminal law and, if it tres- passes beyond these objects, it becomes itself an offender against that liberty of the individual for the protection of which society exists and laws are made. The barbarous distinction between felony and misdemeanor, founded on an extinct condition of things, ought to be abolished in form as it is in fact ; for it only serves to make the law complex and to create confusion in the public mind. Oeimes are such acts as invade the right of free enjoyment of person and property, com- mitted with a guilty mind and by design, and not under a bond fide claim of right, or accidentally. The public avenges these wrongs because the safety of all would be imperilled if any one member of it could be invaded with impunity. In this lies the distinction between crimes and vices, the latter being sins which a man commits, not against his fellow-man, but against himseK, and for which he is responsible only to his God. An illustration of this distinction, as it is observed in our law, is the case of a man who eats and drinks to excess, or games for his own indulgence. So long as his vice injures only himself, the law will not control him ; but if, as a consequence of it, he neglects to maintain his family, and throws them as a burden upon the public, he commits a crime against the public, for which the law will punish him. Incontinence is a vice in those who indulge in it ; but the law does not punish it as a crime vmless it is so openly done as to be an annoyance to others. So it is with many other immoralities. It is true that our law, in some instances, trespasses beyond its proper pro- vince in this respect ; but the statutes that have so done. Principles of Punishment. xlv like sumptuary and other laws that attempt interference with the right of the individual to do what he pleases, provided he does not thereby invade the equal liberty or property of others, are, for the most part, either obsolete or rarely sought to be enforced. There is, however, a class of laws, verging closely upon them, that make vice penal, not because it is vice, but because it becomes a crime under certain circumstances ; and Judges, Magistrates, and Juries, in dealing with those composite offences, should carefully separate the criminal element from the m.erely vicious one, not merely for the purpose of conviction, but for the award of punishment. It is especially in this class of cases that the danger arises of an unconscious substitution of the impulse of emotion for the calm voice of reason ; and Juries are apt wrongly to convict and Judges to punish, not for the crime against the public, with which alone it is their province to deal, but for the vice in the individual, with which they have generally no concern. The only way to avoid this not infrequent error is sedulously to keep in view the dis- tinction between vice and crime, and first to see that the criminal portion of the offence is proved, and then to award the penalty in strict accordance with the crime, without permitting hatred for the vice and aversion to the vicious to sway the judgment in estimating the punishment. Foremost in this class of composite offences are those more properly to be described as immoralities. The law usually professes to take no notice of these unless they are so practised as to offend public order and decency. Thus, a prostitute is not punishable for taking men to her own lodgings ; but a person who keeps a house for , the purpose of indiscriminate prostitution is subject to xlvi Principles of Punishment. penalties. It is an offence to have connection witli a woman in a public ttorouglifare, but not if it be done in a private place. Indecent exposure in a public place, where it may be seen by two or more persons, is an indictable offence ; but it is not so to expose to one person in a private place. Many similar instances might be adduced, but these will suffice to show what it is that converts vice into crime, what is necessary to be proved for a conviction, and how the punishment should be measured. Indictments for keeping a house of ill-fame have for their object prevention rather than punishment ; and therefore, if the house has been well conducted, the usual and proper course is discharge on recognisances to appear for judgment when called upon, a pledge being taken for the giving up of the premises within a fixed time, and that the defendant wiU not so offend again. But if it has been a public nuisance by the habitual miscon- duct of its inmates, or visitors, or by the negligence of the manager, it becomes on that account a proper subject for punishment. The sale of indecent books, photographs, and prints calls, not merely for suppression, but for punishment of some severity. It is, in fact, the distribution of a moral poison. It has been said that, inasmuch as they only purchase who are abeady corrupted, no harm is done to the community ; but when once the evU thing has passed to a purchaser, the vendor cannot know into what in- nocent hands it may come and what mischief it may do. If the transaction were limited to the parties who deal in them, the argument would hold good ; but as that can- not be secured, the seller is guilty of a great crime against the community and should be punished accordingly. Principles of Punishment. ^ > xlvii Sexual injuries to cidldren, if jneasured by their consequences to the victim, require exemplary punish- ment ; and it is a crime peculiarly to be held in check by fear of the consequences of detection. This subject admits of considerable extension ; but I hope enough has been said to direct the attention of Judges and Magistrates to the importance and the prac- ticability of approaching somewhat nearer than hitherto they have done to uniformity in the measure of punish- ment. I will now conclude with a brief recapitulation of the course of the argument that has been here pursued, which may be useful if any reader should desire to recall the suggestions put forth more at length in the foregoing pages. The considerations in determining the measure of punishment are : — I. The Chaeactee op the Oeime. II. The Chaeactee op the Oeiminal. I. The Character of the Grime. Tor this purpose crimes may be classed thus : 1. Crimes of Wantonness. 2. Crimes from Temptation. 3. Crimes involving Breach of Trust. 4. Crimes of Fraud. 5. Crimes of Passion. 6. Crimes of Violence. 7. Crimes of Brutality and Cruelty. 8. Prevalent Crimes. xlviii Principles of Funishment. II. The Character of the Criminal. For tMs purpose criminals may be divided into three classes — 1. The Occasional Criminal. 2. The Habitual Criminal. 3. The Professional Criminal. Other circumstances to be taken into account in measuring punishment are : — 1. Age. 2. Sex. 3. Temptation. 4. If a first, or repeated, offence. There are other offences, more in the nature of vices than crimes, or in which vice becomes crime. Immoralities that become crimes in certain circum- stances. FOEFEITUEE FOE FELONY, AND AWAED OF COSTS, EXPENSES, AND COMPENSATION. The new act abolishing forfeiture for felony makes provisions in respect of the property of felons which may be properly considered here, inasmuch as it em- powers the Court before which the criminal is convicted to deal with such property as a part of the judgment. The act will be found in full in another part of the volume. The provisions to which I would invite attention in this place, are those only that relate to the powers to be exercised by the Judge at the time of the trial. Forfeiture for Felony. xlix It sliould be premised that sect. 9 of 30 & 31 Vict, c. 35, enacted that where a prisoner is convicted, summarily or otherwise, of larceny, or other offence which includes the stealing of any property, and it appears that the prisoner had sold the property to some other person who had no knowledge that it had been stolen, the Court may, on the restitution of the stolen property to the prosecutor, order any moneys taken from the prisoner on his apprehension, not exceeding the amount of the proceeds of the sale, to be delivered to the purchaser. The new statute makes the following further provisions as to the application of moneys taken from the prisoner. These are contained in sections 3 and 4, which sub- stantially empower the Court to order payment of the costs and expenses of the prosecution, and of compensa- tion for any-loss of property not exceeding lOOZ., suffered through, or by means of, the felony. The sections are in terms as follows : Sect. 3. It shall be lawfal for any Court by whioH jadgmebt shall be pronounced or recorded, upon the conviction of any person for treason or felony, in addition to such sentence as may otherwise by law be passed, to condemn such person to the pay- ment of the whole or any part of the costs or expenses incurred in and about the prosecution and conviction for the offence of which he shall be convicted, if to such Court it shall seem fit so to do ; and the payment of such costs and expenses, or any part thereof, may be ordered by the Court to be made out of any moneys taken from such person on his apprehension, or may be enforced at the instance of any person liable to pay, or who may have paid the same, in such and the same manner (subject to the provisions of this act) as the payment of any costs ordered to be paid by the judgment or order of any Court of competent jurisdiction in any civil action or proceeding may for the time being be enforced : Provided, that in the meantime and until the recovery of such costs and expenses from the person so d 1 Foi'feiture for Felony. convicted as aforesaid, or from his estate, the same shall be paid and provided for in the same manner as if this act had not passed; and any money which may be recovered in respect thereof from the person so convicted, or from his estate, shall be applicable to the reimbursement of any person or fund by whom or out of which such costs and expenses may have been paid or defrayed. Sect. 4. It shall be lawful for any such Court as aforesaid, if it shall think fit, upon the application of any person aggrieved, and immediately after the conviction of any person for felony, to award any sum of money, not exceeding one hundred pounds, by way of satisfaction or compensation for any loss of property suffered by the applicant through or by means of the said felony, and the amount awarded for such satisfaction or compensation shall be deemed a judgment debt due to the person entitled to receive the same from the person so convicted, and the order for payment of such amount may be enforced in such and the same manner as in the case of any costs ordered by the Court to be paid under the last preceding section of this act. It will be observed that the powers here given are vested in any Court by which judgment may be pro- nounced or recorded, upon the conviction of any person for felony, and that therefore they extend to Magis- trates' Courts in the exercise of their summary jurisdic- tion in larceny. The condemnation to costs or expenses must be in addition to the sentence, and therefore must be pro- nounced at the same time or during the session of the Court. The Court may exercise a discretion as to the amoimt, and it may award either costs or expenses incurred in the prosecution and conviction for the offence of which the prisoner is convicted, and either all or any part of them. The term " expenses " being used as well as costs indicates that some other than the legal costs may be thus ordered to be paid. Forfeiture for Felony. li " Expenses " is a word of large significance, and might fairly be held to include all outlay legitimately incurred in tte detection of tlie crime and the capture of the criminal, even although they are not such " prosecution costs " as the law recognises. This power may be often exercised with great benefit, especially in Magis- trates' Courts, where no costs are allowed for any outlay or labour preliminary to the actual appearance of the prisoner in the Court. The 4th section empowers the Court, on the appli- cation of any person aggrieved, and immediately after the conviction of any person for felony, to award any sum of money not exceeding lOOZ. by way of satisfac- tion or compensation for any loss of property suffered by the applicant through or by means of the felony — payment to be enforced m the same manner as in the last section is stated. It will be observed that this wholesome power is limited to a conviction for felony. It cannot be exercised in cases of misdemeanor, as in obtaining by false pretences, for instance ; and it is limited to com- pensation for loss of property, and does not extend to compensation for personal injuries. Certainly it is greatly to be regretted that the opportunity was not taken to give the like power of compensation and payment of expenses in cases of fraud, assault, and, in fact, in all offences attended with injury to the person or property of another, without reference to the ideal distinction between felony and misde- meanor. How absurd is it that compensation and costs may be awarded against the stealer of a penny loaf, but not against the ingenious rogue who has obtained 50Z. by a false pretence. d2 Hi Forfeiture for Felony. But how is the order to be enforced ? First. The Court may order pajrment to be made " out of the moneys taken from such person on his apprehension." Observe, that such pajrment must be out of moneys only ; an order cannot be made for the appropriation to this purpose of other property found upon the prisoner. A question here arises, what are " moneys" ? Doubtless the term includes bank notes that are legal tender. But does it extend to country and foreign bank notes, which are only promises to pay money ; or to promissory notes, cheques, and warrants, or orders for the payment of money ? It is difficult to suppose that the legislature did not intend to confiscate all representatives of money equally with money itself ; but not having done so in terms, it would be unsafe for the Judge to depart from the literal language of the statute. Questions are sure to arise upon the meaning of the phrase "taken from such person on his apprehension." Is this an equivalent expression to "found upon " him ? Must the moneys be in the bodily possession of the prisoner, or will it suffice that they shall be in his constructive possession ? For instance, B. and his wife are together when B. is apprehended. Seeing the constable coming, he passes his money to his wife, and, taken from her, will that be held to be "taken from him?" Or in the like case of a servant, will the rule prevail for this purpose that the possession of the wife is that of the husband, of the servant is that of the master? Again, two or three persons have been engaged together in the commission of a joint larceny ; one of them is in possession of " moneys " passed to him by the others. He is acquitted, the others are Forfeiture for Felony. liii convicted. Can tlie Courts construe the expression " moneys taken from such person " as extending to moneys taken from the accomplice who held them for such person at the time of his apprehension ? These are not imaginary difficulties. They are certain to present themselves frequently in these and many other forms, and they must be dealt with, not only by Judges of experience, but by Magistrates, whom they wiU greatly perplex ; and therefore I have directed their attention to them, with a respectful reconimendation that, until a construction has been put by a higher authority upon the imperfect language of the statute, they should adhere strictly to the letter of the law, and limit their orders to the application of such "moneys " only as are taken from the person of the prisoner at the time of his apprehension. Secondly. Payment of costs or expenses and of satis- faction or compensation for loss of property, wholly or in part, may also be ordered by the Court, although no moneys are taken from the prisoner, or the moneys taken are insufficient for the purpose ; and such an order may be enforced at the instance of the " person " liable to pay such costs or expenses, or who may have paid them in part (though not liable in law to do so), in the same manner as the judgment or order of any Court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action may be enforced. As for money ordered by way of satisfaction or compensation, in addition to this last mode of re- covery it is to be deemed a judgment debt due to the person entitled to receive the same from the person convicted. These new statutory provisions for dealing with the liv . Forfeiture for Felony. property of felons may be summarised thus, so far as they relate to acts to be done by the Court at the time of trial and conviction. It is not necessary to notice in this place the other provisions of the statute, for which the reader is referred to the law itself, as it will be found in its proper place in a subsequent part of this volume : 1. The jurisdiction is given to every Court competent to pronounce or record judgment on the conviction of any person for treason or felony. Oonsequenily, the powers of the act extend to Magis- trates in Special Sessions as weU as in General or Quarter Sessions. 2. It must be " in addition to the sentence, and immediately after conviction." 3. The Court is empowered to order — (1.) The payment of " the whole or any part of the costs or expenses incurred in and about the prosecution and conviction for the offence" of which the prisoner is con- victed. And also (2.) " Satisfaction or compensation for any loss of property suffered by the applicant, through or by means of the said felony," not exceed- ing in amount lOOZ. 4. To be made out of — (1.) Any moneys taken from such person on his apprehension. (2.) To be enforced as is " the payment of any costs ordered to be paid by the judgment or order of any Court of competent jurisdiction in any civil action or proceeding." And in case of an order for " satisfaction or compen- The Habitual Criminals Act. Iv sation for any loss of property suffered througli or by means of the said felony." (3.) The order is also to be deemed a judgment debt due to the person entitled to receive the same from the person so convicted. For the appointment by justices of administrators and curators of the property of convicted felons, and the powers and duties of such ofBcers, the reader is referred to the statute. THE HABITUAL OEIMmALS ACT. The reader's attention may be usefuUy directed to some difficulties that have arisen in the construction of the Habitual Criminals Act (32 & 33 Vict. c. 99). In reading the 8th section it is to be observed that the marginal note is entirely wrong. It runs thus — "Person twice guilty of felony and not punished with penal servitude, to be subject to the supervision of the police.'' The section contains no such provision as that in italics. On the contrary, it enacts that supervision of the police is to be the consequence of a former con- viction, in addition to any other punishment which may be awarded. I extract so much of sect. 8 as caUs for comment : 8. Where any person is convicted on indictment of any offence specified in the first schedule hereto in England or Ireland, and in the second schedule hereto in Scotland, and he be proved to have been previously convicted of any offence specified in the said schedule, either before or after the passing of this act, then, in addition to any other punishment vfhioh may be awarded to him, it shall be deemed to be part of the sentence Ivi The Habitual Criminals Act. passed on him, unless otherwise declared by the court, that he is to be subject to the supervision of the police aa hereinafter mentioned for a period of seven years, or such less period as the court shall direct, commencing from the time at which he is convicted, and exclusive of the time during which he is under- going his punishment. ******* When a person is convicted under this section of an offence which subjects him to the supervision of the police, the record of his conviction shall contain & statement to the effect that he is subject to the supervision of the police in pursuance of this Act for a period of seven years commencing from the date of his conviction, and exclusive of the time during which he is under- going his punishment, or words to the like purport, but the omission of any such statement shall not exempt any person from the operation of this section. The previous conviction must be for one of the following offences : Any felony not punishable with death. Uttering false or counterfeit coin. Possessing counterfeit gold or silver coin. Obtaining goods or money by false pretences. Conspiracy to defraud. Misdemeanor under s. 58 of 24 & 25 Vict. c. 96, namely : Whosoever shall be found by' night armed with any dangerous or offensive weapon or instrument whatsoever, with intent to break or enter into any dwelling-house or other building whatsoever, and to commit any felony therein, or shall be found by night having in his possession without lawful excuse (the proof of which excuse shall lie on such person) any picklock key, crow, jack, bit, or other implement of housebreaking, or shall be found by night having his face blackened or otherwise disguised with intent to commit any felony, or shall be found by night in any dwelling-house or other building whatsoever with intent to commit any felony therein, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of T^iB Habitual Criminals Act. Ivii the court, to be kept in penal aervitude for the term of three years, or to be impriaoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. The first question that arises on this section is as to the manner in which a previous conviction is to be proved so as to bring the convict within its provisions. Some Judges consider it to be necessary that the previous conviction should be charged in the indictment, proved, and found by the jury in precisely the same manner as hitherto. Others, and among them the writer of this note, are of opinion that the former con- viction needs not to be so charged, but may be proved by any sufficient legal evidence to the satisfaction of the Judge alone. In this conviction I am confirmed by the above list of offences that may be proved for the purpose of placing the convict under police super- vision, for some of these could not be charged in an indictment for felony, and, consequently, would be in- capable of proof unless proved in the manner suggested. If this view be the right one, all that is required where a former conviction has been discovered, although not charged in the indictment, is that the Judge should take special care to see that such former conviction is sufficiently proved ; he should require the production of the certificate and the proof of identity precisely as if it had been charged in the indictment ; and an oppor- tunity should be given to the prisoner to deny or dis- prove it. It is to be noted that where this course is taken there must be an express recorded judgment of the Court that the prisoner had been formerly convicted of the offence (stating it^ ; otherwise police supervision would not foUow as of course. It would be the better d3 Iviii The Haiilual Criminals Act. plan in suet a case for the Judge to pronounce publicly the sentence of police supervision. The section proceeds to enact that police supervision " shall be deemed to b6 part of the sentence." It ia not, therefore, necessary that it should be stated m passing sentence ; nor, indeed, is it the general practice of the judges to do so. But it is well worthy of con- sideration whether, as matter of policy, the sentence of police supervision should not be pronounced in open court in all cases ; not merely that the convict, but that his friends and companions and all the public, should know that the consequences of crime are not limited to the immediate punishment, but that they will be fol- lowed by inconveniences and restraints, more or less dis- agreeable, for many years after the punishment has been endured. The writer was once asked by a convict on whom he had pronounced this sentence what it meant, and certainly he was unable to say ; but the very vague- ness of it is calculated to make it formidable to the minds of the convict class ; and as it was designed to be repres- sive, surely it ought to be proclaimed as publicly as pos- sible that a second conviction does entail such conse- quences. It will be observed that the direction in the latter part of the section is not in accordance vdth the provision in the preceding part of it, which empowers the Ooart to order a less term of supervision than seven years ; for it proceeds to enact that the record of convic- tion shall contain " a statement to the effect that he is subject to the supervision of the police, in pursuance of this act, for a period of seven years, commencing from the date of his conviction and exclusive of the time during which he is undergoing his punishment, or words to the like purport ;'' omitting the words " or for such The Habitual Criminals Act. lix lesser term as the Court shall have ordered." This is one instance of the many to be found of the careless manner in which the biU was drawn or amended. It is, however, of little practical importance ; for the section goes on to provide that " the omission of any such statement shall not exempt any person from the operation of this section." Passing to sect. 11, relating to receivers of stolen goods, it is enacted that — Where any person who either before or after the passing of this act has been previously convicted of any offence specified in the first schedule hereto, and involving fraud or dishonesty, is found in the possession of stolen goods, evidence of such previous conviction shall be admissible as evidence of his knowledge that such goods have been stolen ; and in any proceedings that may be taken against him as receiver of stolen goods, or otherwise in relation to his having been found in possession of such goods, proof may be given of his previous conviction before evidence is given of his having been found in possession of such stolen goods ; provided that not less than seven days' notice shall be given to such person that proof Is intended to be given of his previous conviction, and that he will be deemed to have known such goods to have been stolen until he has proved the contrary. The words " he wiU. be deemed to have known such goods to have been stolen until he has proved the contrary," have been read by the majority of lawyers as meaning what the words in their usual sense would certainly be taken to mean, namely, that a person charged with receiving stolen goods, having been pre- viously convicted of the like offence, on proof of pos- session of the stolen goods, vriU be " deemed to have known such goods to have been stolen until he has proved the contrary," and that the effect of such an enactment is to throw upon the prisoner the burden of proof ; that is to say that, whereas in other cases the Ix The Habitual Criminals Act. proof of guilty knowledge was on the prosecution, where the prisoner has been formerly convicted, guilty knowledge is to be presumed unless he proves the contrary. But the Court of Criminal Appeal has taken a different view of this provision, and, rendering the words in a non-natural sense, has decided in the case of Reg. v. Davis (22 L. T. Eep. 763) that the act has made no change in the burden of proof, and that it is stUl, as it was before, for the prose- cution to prove that the piisoner had guilty knowledge. According to this decision, the only change made by the section is that proof of a previous conviction for " any offence specified in the first schedule, and in- volving fraud or dishonesty, may be given in evidence against him before evidence is produced of the posses- sion of such stolen goods ;'' but seven days* notice is to be given to the prisoner that such proof of a previous conviction is intended to be produced. Some time since I had occasion to ask the opinion of my learned friend, Mr. Gebaves, Q.C, the framer and draftsman of the Criminal Law Consolidation Acts, and the well-known editor of " EusseU on Crimes," for his views on some points of Criminal Law, upon which considerable dtfiference and doubt appeared to prevail. I was favoured, in Etnswer to my request, with an elaborate treatise on those subjects, which was of so rfluoh value that, with his permission, I gave the Profession the benefit of it in the pages of the Law Times. Appearing to me to be well worthy of pre- Arrest without Warrant. Ixi eervation in a more accessible form, I have asked and obtained tbe consent of the Author to its republication in this volume, where it wiU, I doubt not, be an appro- priate and acceptable addition to the Consolidation Acts that are his handiwork, and I am sure wiU not be looked upon by readers as the least valuable portion of these pages. I preface it with an article, by the same hand, on " The Law of Arrest without a Warrant," written in answer to a paper on that subject which appeared in the Times. THE LAJP^OF ARREST WIXSOUT A, WABSA^T. It is so very desirame that the authority to arrest without a warrant in cases of indictable offerees should be clearly under- stood, that I have drawn up the following paper, and I have thought it incumbent on me so to do in order that my silence may not be supposed to give an implied assent to everything contained in a paper on the subject which appeared in the Times, and was transferred into these columns, as I have been erro- neously supposed by some to be the author of that paper. I will first deal with cases of misdemeanor, and I shall use that word throughout to denote an offence below treason and felony, for which an indictment will lie ; and it must be borne in mind that it is a general rule that " an attempt to commit a misdemeanor is a misdemeanor, whether the offence is created by statute, or was an offence at common law :" (Rex v. Roderick, 7 C. &_P. 795, Parke, B. ; Reg. v. Chapman, Den. 0. 0. 432.) Now it is perfectly settled that no person can, without a warrant, arrest another for a misdemeanor after it is altogether over; in other words, the authority to arrest, if it exist, is' confined to cases where " the party is caught in the fact :" {Fox V. Gaunt, 3 B. & Ad. 798.) And this limitation necessarily excludes all misdemeanors where the offence consists entirely in the omission or neglect to do or perform some act or duty : such, for instance, as the neglect to provide food for a child or apprentice ; the neglect to repair a highway by a party bound to Ixii Arrest without Warrant, repair ratione temrcB, and the like : (see MorUy v. Rogers, 2 E. & E. 674.) In the paper in the Times it ia laid down that " in a case of mere misdemeanor, indeed, except when a statute enacts other- wise, a private individual is not justified in arresting without a warrant; and even an ofSoer is not justified in so arresting, unless the misdemeanor is committed in his presence." This general proposition as to private individuals is partly correct and partly erroneous. It is correct as to the cases of omissions and neglects, which have already been mentioned, and as to all oases where the party is not caught in the act ; but it is erroneous in numerous other cases ; and the important question is whether it is not erroneous in every case where the party is caught in the act; and whether in every such case a private person may not lawfully arrest the offender with- out a warrant. In Hollyday v. Oxenbridge (Oro. Oar. 324), to an action of trespass, &o., the defendant pleaded that the plaintiff communiter usus fait an ill trade called cheating at play with false dice and defrauding people of their money ; that he went to a house where he found the defendant and one Arnold, unespert in such play, and induced them to play at dice with him for money, and the plaintiff playing with them " with false dice subtilly conveyed by the plaintiff (divers sums of the defendant's money faho et fraudttknter depredatis) " would have sought to escape, but the defendant, knowing certainly that he was deceived by the cheating with false dice, moUiter manus imposuit on the plaintiff to take him before a justice to be examined concerning the said offence, and that the justice examined him and bound him to appear at the sessions, where he was convicted of the said offence. On demurrer to this plea, it was objected that " one cannot, without an officer, for any cause, and that upon his own suspicion only, arrest or stay any person unless in felony." But all the Court (the Chief Justice being absent) held " the plea to be good; for it is shown that he was a common cheater, and that he cozened with false dice, and therefore the defendant led him to a justice of the peace; and it appears by the plea that there was good cause for staying him ; for he was afterwards conTioted of that offence. And it is pro bono publico to stag sueh offenders." There is a note of Arrest without Warrant. Ixiii thia case in 2 Roll. Abr. tit. " Trespass " 0., pi. 2, p. 646, which agrees with thia report. Now, here we have the very proposition which ia asserted in the paper in the Times, put forward as the only ground of objection to the plea, and instantly overruled ; and the caae decides that the right to arrest a person caught in the com- mission of an offence is not confined to treason and felony, but does at least extend to this misdemeanor. Then the decision is not rested upon any ground which ia solely applicable to that oEfence ; but ia reated upon the broad ground that " it is pro bono publico to stay such offenders," which is equally applicable to every case of misdemeanor, and is, no doubt, the ground upon which the authority to arrest in treason and felony also rests. I have stated this case thus fully, because it may well be considered aa the leading case upon the subject. It has never been questioned, and, on the contrary, it haa been aanotioned by very great authority. In JFox v. Gaunt, the following pasaage of Hawkins, in which he cites and comments on this caae, was cited in the argument: " It hath been adjudged that anyone may apprehend a common notorious cheats going about the country with false dice, and being actually caught playing with them, in order to have him before a justice of the peace j for the public good requires the utmost discouragement of all such persons; and the restraining of private persons from arresting them with- out a warrant from a magistrate would often give an opportunity of escaping. And from the reason of this case it seems to follow that the arrest of any other offenders by private persons, for offences in like manner scandalous and prejudicial to the public, may be justified :'' (2 Hawk. P. C, c. 12, aect. 20.) And Lord Tenterden, O.J., in delivering the judgment of the Court, said, " The instances in Hawkins are where a party is caught in the fact, and the observation there added assumes that the person arrested is guilty. Here the case is only of suspicion." Little- dale, Parke, and Taunton, JJ., concurred. Here, then, is a distinct recognition by these four great judges of the case of HoUyday v. Oxenbridge, and of the distinction between the apprehension of a party caught in the act of committing a misdemeanor and on a charge of having committed such an offence at a previous time; and as the Court expressly held that there was no distinction iij. the latter case between one kind Ixiv'. Arrest without Warrant. of misdemeanor and another, the fair inference is, that there is no distinction in the former case either — in other words, the fair inference from this decision is, that where a party is caught in the act of committing any misdemeanor, he may be arrested by any private person. It seems clear, also, that it was tacitly assumed by all in this case that there was power to apprehend a party caught in the act; for if there were no such power, there assuredly could be no power to arrest after the offence had been completed, and the offender had gone away. It does notappear by Oroke's report of Hollyday v. Oxenhridge that any previous authorities were cited; but I have no doubt that the Judges, who in those days were very familiar with the Year Books and other old authorities, were aware of the previous authorities, especially as they based their decision upon the very ground there stated. Thus, in the Tear Book (4 Hen. 7, fol. 18, pi. 12), Hussey and Fairfax held that any- one could apprehend night-walkers, " for it is for the common benefit " [the reference here to Pasc. 2 Hen. 7, fol. 6, should be fol. 16], and in the case in the Tear Book (4 Hen. 7, fol. 1, 2, pi. 2), where it was held that a watchman may arrest a night- walker by a warrant in law (as Lord Ooke says, in 2 Inst. 52), it was laid down by Fairfax that a court leet might lawfully inquire of night-walkers, for it is for the common weal. So that we see where the principle on which HoUyday v. Oxenbridge was decided may have come from, clearly enough. In Willow's case (Latch. 173), it was held that an indictment which alleged that the defendant, being of ill-fame, &c., fuit nocte vagans, was good, and Doderidge, J. (a great Judge), said that by the common law any man can arrest a night-walker, and he referred to the Tear Book (4 Hen. 7, fol. 18, pi. 12). Lord Coke (2 Inst. 52) says : " If a man keep the company of a notorious thief, whereby he is suspected, &c., it is a good cause and warrant in law to arrest him." For which he cites the Year Book, 26 Edw. 3, 71a [an error for 17a, pi. 8], where the case was that the bailiffs of H. were about to arrest the suspected person, but he fled, and they freshly pursued him to W., where " a lour pursuit " the bailiffs and constable there arrested him. Neither argument nor judgment is given. It is clear the bailiffs of H. would be private individuals in W. I have referred to these old authorities, and I might have Arrest without Warrant. Ixv referred to others in oases of affrays and breaches of the peace, in order to show that there has been from very early times indeed a regular current of decisions and judicial opinions that any private person may arrest an offender caught in the act of committing a misdemeanor, and, consequently, that Mollyday v. Oxenbridge was only an instance of a previously well-known rule. I will next advert to a class of cases of which there are many to be found in the old books, but it will be quite sufBoient to refer to the late authorities alone. In Timothy v. Simpson (5 Tyr. R. 244), the defendant, who had himself immediately before witnessed an affray, gave one of affrayers in charge to a constable on the very spot where it was committed, and whilst there was a reasonable apprehension of its continuance, and the Court held that he was justified in so doing, though the constable had seen no part of the affray. And, after referring to old authorities, the Court say, in one of the ablest judgments delivered by Lord Wensleydale : "It is clear, therefore, that any person present may arrest the affrayer at the moment of the affray, and detain him till his passion has cooled and his desire to break the peace has ceased, and then deliver him to a police officer ? And if that be so, what reason can there be why he may not arrest an affrayer after the actual violence is over, but whilst he shows a disposition to renew it by persisting in remaining on the spot where he has committed it ? Both cases fall within the same principle, which is, that for the sake of the preservation of the peace, any individual who sees it broken may restrain the liberty of him whom he sees breaking it so long as his conduct shows that the public peace is likely to be endangered by his acts." And the Court afterwards say: "He was justified in securing any one (of the affrayers), not absolutely, but only until a Magistrate could inquire into all the circumstances, on oath, and bind one party to prosecute or the other to keep the peace, as upon a review of all the circum- stances he might think fit." And this decision has been approved in Jngle v. Bell, (1 M. & W. 516), Cohen v. HusJcisson (2 M. & W. 477), Webster V. Watts (11 Q. B. 311), and other cases; so that there can be no doubt that any private person may take in to custody any other, who commits a breach of the peace in his presence, and Ixvi Arrest without Warrant. take him before a magistrate, to be dealt with according to law; and this rule will apply to all oases of riot, rout, un- lawful assemblies, and affrays. I now turn to another class of misdemeanors, viz., attempts to commit felony. Many of these axe now made felony by statute ; but at common law they were all of them only misdemeanors ; and I shall here deal with them as such only. " All persons whatsoever, who are present when a felony is committed, are bound to apprehend the offender " (2 Hawk. P. G. c. 12, i). 1) ; and "silently to observe the commission of a felony, without using any endeavours to apprehend the offender, is a misprision " of felony : (1 Hawk. P. 0. o. 69, s. 2.) It would seem that these authorities alone prove that a private person may apprehend anyone attempting to commit a felony- The object of apprehending an offender is twofold ; first, in order to prevent the commission of an offence ; and secondly, in order to bring the offender to justice, and both are pro bono publico. If there were no power to arrest in order to prevent a felony, either unknown offenders would always escape, or the offender must be permitted to complete his crime and then be arrested. Now, the primary object of the law is the prevention of crime, and over and over again have I heard learned Judges, especially that great and good Judge, Patteson, J., severely reprimand private persons for not at once arresting offenders whilst attempting to committing crimes, instead of watching them till they had completed their object. In order to prevent a breach of the peace, an offender may be apprehended by a private person, and strange indeed would it be if the same might not be done in order to prevent a capital offence ; and, in considering this ques- tion, it must be remembered that aU felonies were capital at common law. There is, however, abundance of decisive authority upon the subject. In the Year Book, 9 Edw. 4, fol. 26, pL 36, to trespass for false imprisonment, the defendant pleaded that the plaintiff was lying in wait in the highway to rob the King's subjects, and one Alice at Stile rode along the highway, against whom the plaintiff drew his sword, and commanded her to deliver her purse to him, whereon she levied hue and cry, and the defendant was riding there, and heard the cry, and returned to her, and took the plaintiff; and because there were no stocks in the village took Arrest without Warrant. Ixvii him to S., and there delivered him to the constable. Oenney objected to the plea, that no (priyate) person can imprison another for any trespass ; but a constable can arrest him until he has found surety. But for suspicion of felony anyone can arrest another ; but then it is necessary that a felony has been com- mitted in fact, and that he who is arrested was suspected of it, but here no felony was committed. Moile : " If a man say to me, ' See this man, I will certainly kill him,' &o., in this case I may hold him so that he do not kill the man, and yet this holding is an imprisonment, but it is for a lawful cause." Genney : " In your case, if I see that a man would have killed another, I may well prevent him, and so I may prevent a man from doing a thing against the peace ; but yet I cannot arrest him and commit him to gaol." Nedham : " You may well arrest and commit Mm to gaol, if he intends to do a felonious act, as this was." And all the justices held this justification good. In the Yeai- Book, 13 Edw. 4, fol. 9, pi. 4, it was held that for felony a man may break into a house to arrest the felon, for to arrest him is for the common weal. In Handcock v. Baker, 2 B. & P. 260, to trespass for breaking and entering the plaintiff's dwelling-house, forcing him out of his house along the public street and imprisoning him, the defendant pleaded that the plaintiff in his dwelling-house assaulted his wife, and purposed to have feloniously killed her, and was on the point of doing so, whereupon the defendant, to prevent the plaintiff from so killing his wife, and committing the said felony, broke into the house and prevented the plaintiff from killing his wife ; and for the same purpose, and also for that of taking and delivering the plaiutiff to a constable, to be by him taken before a justice, and dealt with according to law, kept him, a reasonable time, &c., and then took him along the public streets till he could find a, constable, and then delivered him to the constable for the purpose aforesaid ; and this plea was held good after the verdict by Lord Eldon and the Judges of the Common Pleas ; and Chambre, J,, said — " There is a great difference between the right of a private person in cases of intended felony and of a breach of the peace. It is lawful for a private person to do anything to prevent the perpetration of a felony." One objection to this plea was that it did not allege that the plaintiff's intention to kill continued during the whole time the Ixviii Arrest without Warrant. defendant detained him; but the Court held that "it was suiSoient to answer that after verdict it muat be presumed that everything is proved which is necessary to support the verdict." It should seem that a bettar answer would have been that this plea justified the imprisonment on two grounds ; firstly, in order to prevent the commission of the felony ; and, secondly, in order that the plaintiff might be taken before a justice and " dealt with according to law ;" and as to this the continuance of the intention was certainly unnecessary. It may be doubted whether this plea alleges an attempt to murder, as it uses the terms of an indictment for manslaughter, and omits the technical terms of an indictment for murder. In Rex V. Hunt (R. & M. 0. 0. R. 93, a.d. 1825), the prisoner was indicted for wounding ; and it appeared that he had in the night entered the prosecutor's yard, with intent to break open the stable, and steal his goods. The prosecutor was called up by one of his servants, and found the stable had been attempted, and the door cut in such a manner that the bolt was exposed, and found the prisoner concealed in the yard, and some house- breaking instruments, with one of which the door of the stable appeared to have been cut, were found near the spot where the prisoner was. The prosecutor arrested the prisoner, who after- wards cut the servant, who was assisting in detaining him. It was objected that the prisoner was not lawfully in custody, an attempt to commit felony being only a misdemeanor ; but it was held that, " the prisoner being detected in the night attempting to commit a felony, might lawfully be detained without warrant till he could be taken before a magistrate." At the time when this offence was committed a burglary might be committed in a stable, which was within the curtilage, and consequently at that time an attempt to break into such a stable in the night, with> intent to steal the goods therein, was an attempt to commit a felony, and that was clearly the offence of the prisoner ; for at that time no other attempt to break into a stable was an attempt to commit a felony; as the 10 & 11 Will. 3, o. 23, and 1 Geo. 4, c. 117, which applied to private stealing in a stable, did not apply where the stable was broken open at the time the goods were stolen: (Post. 79 ; 2 East P. C. c. 16, s. 79, p. 641.) This case, therefore, decides that a private person may arrest anyone caught in the act of attempting to commit a burglary. I have Arrest without Warrant. Ixix made this explanation, because the caae is so reporteci that any- one might suppose that the power to arrest depended on the attempt to commit a felony being made in the night ; ■whereas the night is really only mentioned in the case because the particular felony there attempted could only be committed in the night. In Rex V. Sowarih (R. & M. 0. 0. E., 207) a similar question arose, and, in stating the case for the Judges, Littledale, J., raised the question whether a private person could arrest a person found attempting to steal boards ; but in the argument for the prisoner, that great lawyer. Sir W. Erie, put it thus : " The power to arrest for offences inferior to felony is confined to the time of committing the offence. Neither peace officer nor private individual can arrest for a misdemeanor after it is over upon the charge of another, and the attempt to commit a felony is within the rule ; '' and then he went on to contend that " here the attempt was over, the intention abandoned," &o. And in reply to Rex v. Hunt, which was cited for the Grown, he said there " the prisoner was caught in the act, and was arrested actually attempting to commit a felony. Here both these facts are negatived." He seems, therefore, to have admitted that any person might arrest another for an attempt to commit a felony in his presence; and the Judges clearly so understood him; for they held that, as the prisoner was taken on fresh pursuit, it was the same as if he had been taken in the outhouse where the boards were, which clearly assumed that he might lawfully have been arrested there. The arrest in this case was also supported by the counsel for the Crown under " The Vagrant Act" (5 Geo. i, u. 83, ». 4), which makes every person found, inter alia, in any outhouse " for any unlawful purpose " a rogue and vagabond, and sect. 6, which authorises any person to apprehend any person "found offend- ing" against the act; but this statute was neither noticed in the reply nor by the Judges, and it seems clear that it did not apply to this case ; for the offences created by sect. 4 are plainly offences for which there was no provision previdusly made; suo^ as a man going into any of the places specified for " any unlawful purpose," but not having attempted to carry it into effect. To extend it to attempts to commit felony would raise the question whether, if it did so extend, it did not Ixx Arrest without Warrant. impliedly repeal the heavier punishments to which they were liable. On these authorities it seems to be perfectly clear that any private person may lawfully apprehend any person whom he may catch in the attempt to commit any felony, and take him before a justice to be dealt with according to law. I have now adduced abundantly sufficient authorities to prove that the general assertion in the paper in the Times that " a private individual is not justified in arresting without a warrant " a person found committing a misdemeanor, cannot be supported. On the contrary, those authorities very strongly tend to show that any private individual may arrest any person whom he catches committing any misdemeanor. It is quite true that I have been unable to find any express authority which goes to that extent ; but it must be remembered that where the question turns on some common law rule, there never can have been any authority to lay down any general rule ; each case must necessarily be a single instance of a particular class. And as in larceny, notwithstanding the vast number of cases which have been decided, no complete definition of the ofience has ever yet been given by any binding authority, so in the present case we must not be surprised if we find no general rule established. But when we find that all misdemeanors are of the same class ; that it is impossible to distinguish in any satisfactory way between one and another, and that in the only case (^Fox v. Gaunt) where such a distinction was attempted, the court at once repu- diated it ; and when, on the question whether a party indicted for a misdemeanor was entitled to be discharged on habeas corpus, Lord Tenterden, O.J., said, in delivering the judgment of the court, "I do not know how, for this purpose, to distinguish between one class of crimes and another. It has been urged that the same principle will warrant an arrest in the case of a common assault. That certainly will follow :" {Ex parte Scott, 9 B. &. 0. 446.) And when, above all, the same broad principle that it is for the common good that all offenders should be arrested, applies to every misdemeanor, and that principle has been the foundation of the decisions from the earliest times, and was the ground on which Timothy v. Simpson was decided ; the only reasonable conclusion seems to be that the power to arrest Arrest without Warrant. Ixxi applies to all misdemeanors alike wherever the offender is caught in the act. As I understand the words, "except where a statute enacts otherwise," in the passage I have copied from the Times, those words refer to statutes which authorise the apprehension of offenders for offences created hj them, such as the Larceny and Malicious Injuries Acts. If that be so, the learned author seems to have overlooked the very important clause in sect. 11 of the 14 & 15 Yict. c. 19, which merits a prominent notice in any paper on the power to arrest in cases of misdemeanor. This clause enacts that " it shall be lawful for any person whatsoever to apprehend any person who shall be found committing any indictable offence in the night." It is perfectly clear that this provision includes every misdemeanor committed in the night. As I was the author of this clause I can explain the reason why it was introduced. 'A serious misapprehension had arisen in oases of poaching by three or more persons armed in the night, under sect. 9 of the 9 Geo. 4, c. 69. Sect. 1 of that act created an offence, not indictable, but punishable on summary conviction, where any person entered or was in any land by night for the purpose of poaching ; then sect. 2 empowered the owner of the land, and certain others, to apprehend any person found committing any offence against sect. 1. And sect. 9 made any persons who, to the number of three or more, entered or were in any land by night, armed with offensive weapons for the purpose of poaching, guilty of a misdemeanor. In Eex V. Ball (B. & M. C. 0. R. 330), the prisoner was indicted for shooting at S. Goode with intent to resist his apprehension for the offence that he and divers other persons were found armed in the night in a wood for the purpose of taking game. It is doubtful whether this sufficiently charged an offence within sect. 9 of the 9 Geo. 4, o. 69 ; but the evidence proved an offence by the prisoner and twenty-one others within sect. 9 ; and thereupon it was objected that sect. 2 gave no power to arrest for any offence other than one within sect. 1, and that this was an offence against sect. 9, and not against sect. 1 ; but Bayley, B., " thought the offence was an offence upon the first section, though, from the circumstances of aggravation that accompanied it, it was punishable under the ninth section," and the Judges supported this ruling, "as the prisoner was guilty of Ixxii Arrest without Warrant. an offence under the first seotion as well as the ninth."' As the conviction was sustained on this ground, it was unnecessary to consider the power to apprehend for a misdemeanor under sect. 9, even if it coiild "have been raised under this form of indictment ; and the point was not noticed in the case. In Bex T. Warner (R. & M. C. 0. R. 380; 5 C. & P. 525), the prisoners were convicted of maliciously wounding a gamekeeper of one manor, who met them on a highway two or three hundred yards from a wood in another manor, and the conviction was supported on the ground that there was no attempt to arrest the prisoners, and no provocation sufficient to reduce the offence to man- slaughter, if death had ensued. It was admitted by the counsel for the Crown that there was no power to apprehend, under sect. 2 of the 7 Geo. 4, u. 69, and there clearly was not, for the prisoners were not " found upon any land committing " any offence against sect. 1, but were met at a distance from the place where the offence, if any, had been committed; and, for the same reason, there clearly was no power to apprehend for the misdemeanor under sect. 9, and this point was not noticed in this case. In Rex v. Addis (6 C. & P. 389) a party of poachers were in a wood in pursuit of game, and the deceased, an assistant keeper of Mr. Clive, pursued and tried to apprehend ,them, and one of them turned roimd and shot the deceased. Mr. Olive had only the owner's permission to preserve the wood, which was not within any manor belonging to Mr. Clive. It was objected that the deceased had no authority to apprehend under sect. 2 of the 9 Geo. 4, c. 69, and Patteson, J., held the objec- tion to be well founded, but he afterwards . told me that he thought he had gone too far in this case. In Rex v. Davis (7 C. & P. 785), the prisoner was indicted for shooting at a servant of Sir T. Winuington, with intent to murder him. The prisoner and another man had been found poaching by night in -. wood of Colonel Charlet's, and the servant of Sir T. Winnington was shot at whilst pursuing one of them. Parke, B., said : " Unless the prosecutor had authority from Colonel Charlet to arrest poachers, it would only have been manslaughter if death ' had ensued. If Sir T. Winnington was lord of a manor. Including his own land and Colonel Chariot's, he might be justified in apprehending." And there- upon a witness proved that the wood was in a manor of Arrest without Warrant. Ixxiii Sir T. Winninglon's. As there were only two poachers in this case, they were only guilty of an offence under sect. 1, and sect 9 did not apply. From this examination of the cases, it is clear that the point as to the power to apprehend for a misdemeanor against sect. 9 was never raised, and that the only case in which it would have been material was Rex v. Addis. It had appeared, however, to me that if that question were raised the cases I have referred to might be cited to show that there was no authority to arrest offenders against sect. 9, except that given by sect. 2 ; and as any doubt as to the authority to arrest in these cases was calculated to lead to acts of violence, it seemed to me, when I prepared the 14 & 15 Viot. c. 19, to be much better to set the matter at rest, and therefore I framed sect. 11 of that act, and, instead of reciting that there was no power to arrest in cases of mis- demeanor, I recited, as is usual in like cases, that " doubts had been entertained as to the authority to apprehend persons found committing offences in the night." In Reg. v. Sanderson (1 F. & F. 598) Willes, J., held that sect. 11 of the 14 & 15 Vict. o. 19, authorised the apprehension of persons found committing offences against sect. 9 of the 9 Geo. 4, c. 69; and that very learned Judge held that the clause applied to all persons whomsoever " found committing offences in the night," and thus fully carried into effect the object with which the clause was framed. In this case the counsel for the prisoners alleged that " the night was (by sect. 13 of the same act) enacted to be the same as in cases of burglary." Now, sect. 13 enacts that " the time at which the night shall commence in any offence agai-ast the provisions of this act shall be the same as in cases of burglary ; " and sect. 11 not only does not create any offence, but it does not even apply to any offence against the act, for the previous section provides for the apprehension of persons found committing any offence against the act. Night, therefore, in sect. 11 is not defined at all ; and the time at which it begins and ends, in each case, with reference to this section, will depend on the common law or statute applicable to the case. There ia a distinction between a private person and a constable as to the power to arrest anyone upon suspicion of having com- mitted a felony, which ia thus stated by Lord Tenterden, C. J., e Ixxiv Arresl without Warrant. in Bechmth v. Philby (6 B. & 0. 635) : " In order to justify a private person in causing the imprisonment of a person, he must not only make out a reasonable ground of suspicion, but he must prove that a felony has been actually committed; whereas a constable, having reasonable ground to suspect that a felony has been committed, is authorised to detain the party suspected until inquiry can be made by the proper authorities." This distinction is perfectly settled. The rule as to private persons was so stated by Genney in the Year Book, 9 Edw. 4, already mentioned, and has been fully settled ever since the case of' Ledwith v. Catchpoh{CaM. 291, a.d. 1783). But there seems to be an exception to this rule where an indictment for felony has been found against the party appre- hended, for this seems to be a good cause of arrest by a private person: (Dalt. c. 170, s. 5; 1 East P. C, o. 5, s. 68, p. 301.) And as the Court of Queen's Bench will not discharge a party indicted even for a misdemeanor {Ex parte Scott, already cited), this seems to show that a detention of a person indicted is law- ful : (see, also, the Canadian Prisoners' ease, 5 M. & W. 32.) It is quite clear that a person who has committed a felony may, by the common law, be apprehended in any part of Her Majesty's dominions. By the common law each county in England was as distinct from every other county as if it wei-e a different kingdom ; and Lord Mansfield, C. J., in Hex v. Weston- under-Penyard (4 Burr. B507), said, " The old jurisdiction of counties was local; they were like different kingdoms. There was no jurisdiction out of the county; no process out of it." And so totally distinct is one county from another, that where a parish lies partly in two adjoining counties, an indictment for the non-repair of part of a highway lying in one county must be against the inhabitants of the part of the parish which lies in that county: (/6irf.) The question, therefore, of the right to arrest a felon in one part of Her Majesty's dominions for a felony committed in another, is precisely the same as that of the right to apprehend a felon in one county for a felony committed in another. Now, it was held very long ago that any person may appre- hend a felon in one county for a felony committed in another county (Tear Books, 11 Edw. 4, fol. 4, pi. 8; s. c. 'M. 6, and 13 Edw. 4, fol. 8, pi. 4 ; see also Piatt v. Lokke, Plowd. 35, 37 ; Arrest without Warrant. Ixxv 2 Hale P. 0. 51) ; and a justice of the peace may examine a felon arrested in his county for a felony committed in another county (2 Hale, P. C. 51), or may issue his warrant to apprehend a felon who is in his county for a felony committed in another county: (1 Hale, P. 0. 580.) In reality, the' corporeal presence of a felon in a county gives exactly the same power to apprehend him there as if the felony had been there committed. And hence it is that it is quite immaterial in what part of Her Majesty's dominions the felony was committed or the prisoner apprehended. Thus, a prisoner may be apprehended in Scotland for a felony committed in Ireland, brought to England, and sent to Ireland to be tried : (Co/. Lundy's case, 2 Ventr. 314.) So a person may be apprehended in England for a, felony committed In Ireland' and sent thither to be tried : (^Rex v. Kimberletj, 2 Str. 848.) So a person arrested in England for a murder in Barbadoes may be sent thither to be tried : (^Anonymous, cited 2 Ventr. 314.) Nay more, if -■ felony be committed out of the Queen's dominions, whether on land or sea, the felon may be apprehended in England, as in the case of the man committed in England for a murder in Portugal, cited in 2 Str. 849, from 3 Keble, 785, and of the man who had committed a felony on the high seas, and was examined and committed by a justice into whose county he came: {Rex v. Muilman, Park, 241; 5 Bum, J., D. and W. 11.) And here I may mention a case where a man was arrested in London on his own confession that he had committed a felony in Australia not very long since, and, if I mistake not, discharged on the ground that such an offender could only be dealt with under the 6 & 7 Vict. t. 34, which requires a warrant to be issued in that part of the Queen's dominions where the offence was committed for his apprehension in Great Britain. But this was a clear mistake, as that act was expressly passed " to make more effectual provision for the apprehension and trial of offenders " who may be in other parts of Her Majesty's dominions than those where the offences were committed. So that it is perfeotly clear that the conamon law power of arrest in such cases remains unaffected by this act. Very important questions may arise where an officer has two or more warrants, one of which is bad, or a bad warrant, and a lawful authority to arrest independently of that warrant. The points which may arise in such cases in consequence of the e2 Ixxvi Arrest without Wan-ant. resistance of the party apprehended, or of the interference of other persons, are very numerous, and only a few of them can be noticed. In civil cases it is fully Settled that an officer is not confined in court to the authority which alone he alleged when he acted ; but he may certainly resort to any authority which justified his proceedings. Governors of Bristol Poor- v. Wait (1 Ad. & E. 264), which ia in accordance with the Year Book 5 Hen. 7, fol. 23, not 13 as cited in 2 Roll. Abr. Replevin, M. pi. 4, p. 433, and other authorities there collected, and many subsequent cases. But I have failed to discover any criminal case in vfhioh any such, point has ai'isen, except on habeas corpus. Some civil cases, however, nearly approach criminal cases. In Grenville v. The CoUege of Physicians (12 Mod. R. 386), where in an action for assault, &c., the defendants justified under a warrant, and it was held that a replication de injuria was bad because it did not traverse the warrant. Holt, C.J., said : " Suppose one has a legal and an illegal warrant (to arrest), yet he may justify by virtue of the legal one, for it is not what he declares, but the authority which he has is his justification." In Hoye v. Busk (1 M. & G. 775), the plaintiff had been arrested under a warrant to take John Hoye tor stealing a mare; but his name was really Richard, and it was held that the arrest was illegal, although he was the person against whom the information was given, and the warrant was intended to be issued. It was not proved that any felony had been committed, and Tindal, 0. J., observed during the argument, " If he were the guilty person, the officer would not want the warrant, supposing the felony to have been com- mitted." And in delivering judgment the same great Judge said : " Where, indeed, it can be shewn that a felony has actually been committed, the constable may throw the warrant aside. It will be sufficient in such a case for the constable to show that he has taken the person really charged with the offence, however he may have been described in the warrant." In both these cases these dicta were perfectly correct, as they were civil suits, and in such a suit the authorities abundantly show that the officer may justify his acts by any authority which he in fact possessed. But it seems to admit of grave doubts whether this doctrine can be supported in all criminal oases. Suppose a constable, having Arrest without Warrant. Ixxvii a good and bad warrant, ai-rest a man on the bad warrant only, which he allows the man to read, who sees it is void, and resists his arrest on that ground, and the result is the death of the o£Eoer ; if this had been the only authority the ofBcer had the offence would have been only manslaughter ; is the man guilty of murder by reason of the good warrant, of which he knew nothing? It would seem that there are strong reasons for saying that he would not be guilty of murder. The ground on which the killing an oflScer is murder is that the killer is wilfully setting the law at defiance, and killing an officer in the execution of his duty. The ground on which the killing of an officer whilst executing an unlawful warrant is manslaughter is that every man has a dght to resist an unlawful arrest, and that such an arrest is a sufficient provocation to reduce the killing to manslaughter. In the supposed case the killer would not be setting the law at defiance, but would be resisting what appeared to him to be an unlawful arrest; and the actual provocation would be just as great as if the bad warrant alone existed. It is of the essence of a warrant that " the party upon whom it is executed should know whether he is bound to submit to the aiTest :" (Per Ooltman, J., in Hoye v. Busk, citing Rex V. Weir, 1 B. & C. 288.) And where an arrest is made without a warrant, it is of the essence of the lawfulness of the arrest that the party arrested should have either express or implied notice of the cause of the arrest. Now where a constable in the supposed case arrests on the void warrant, the party arrested has no express notice of the good warrant, for it is not shown, and no implied notice of it, for every thing done by the constable is referable to the void warrant ; and, besides, the conduct of the constable is calculated to mislead, and it may well be that the party is innocent, and knows nothing of the offence specified in the valid warrant. Lastly, it must be re- membered that in such a case the criminality of the act depends upon the intention of the party arrested, and that intention can- not in any way be affected by faults of which he is ignorant. On the other hand, it would seem to be clear that, where an officer has two or more warrants, one of which is bad, and he shows all to the party to be arrested, who kills the officer in resisting the arrest, it would be murder; for he was bound to yield obedience to the lawful authority. Ixxviii Arrest without Warrant. Next, as to third persons interfering. If tbe ofiBcer has a person in custody nnder a good and bad warrant, that is clearly a lawful custody, and consequently the killing of an officer by tlird persons, under such circumstances, would clearly be murder. In fact, where an officer has a man in custody under a lawful as well as an unlawful authority, the latter, being in point of law a complete nullity, may be wholly thrown aside in considering the lawfulness of the custody. Suppose, then, a constable were to apprehend a person on reasonable suspicion of having committed a felony, and take him before a justice, who either remanded or committed him by a void warrant, it seems clear that, if the constable were killed by a third person whilst he had the man in custody, it would be murder ; for, though the warrant was bad, he had a lawful authority to detain on the reasonable suspicion. The points as to the law on habeas corpus in criminal cases require explanation. It is said " the rule of law is that a person in custody in this country upon a, criminal charge, with a view to trial, is not, by reason of any irregularity in his arrest, entitled to discharge upon habeas corpus without trial." And again, " in a case of felony, there could be no discharge from custody before trial upon the ground of mere informality in the warrant." Now, the practice and law upon habeas corpus in indictable cases before trial is this : If the prisoner has been committed for trial by a justice, a certiorari directed to the justice to return the depositions miist be obtained, and the case is decided upon the depositions, whenever the commitment is void ; for though the warrant of commitment is informal, yet if, upon the depositions returned, the Court see that a felony or misdemeanor has been committed, and that there, is a reasonable ground of charge against the prisoner, they will not discharge him : (ifei v. Marhs, 3' East B. 1 57.) But if the warrant be void, and the depositions either disclose no indictable offence, or fail to show any reason- able ground of charge against the prisoner, the Court will discharge him. So, if the prisoner has not been taken before a, justice, but the return or affidavits show that he is in custody for any indictable offence, the Court will not discharge him. Thus, where a return showed that the prisoner was in custody on suspicion of a murder, the Court refused to discharge him ; Lord Tenterden saying, " I certainly do not recollect any instance Arrest without Warrant. Ixxix of .sf writ of habeas coi'pus to bring up persons who were in custody for inquiry only, and if we could see that these persons are un- lawfully in custody we must discharge them. But nothing of that kind appears. It is lawful for any person to take into custody a man charged with felony; and keep him until he can be taken before a magistrata." And the Court committed the prisoner to the marshal of the Marshalsea to be taken before some com- petent authority to be examined : (Ex parte Krans, 1 B. & C. 258.) So where it appeared by affidavits that a bill of indict- ment for perjury had been found against the prisoner, the Court refused to discharge her (^Ex parte Scott, 9 B. & C. 446) ; and this case has settled the rule that the law as to habeas cotpus extends to every indictable offence ; for in it the contention was that that law did not extend to misdemeanors, and that if it were extended to that ca^e, it must be held applicable even to cases of common assault ; and Lord Tenterden, as we have seen, declared that that consequence would certainly follow, and the prisoner was remanded. These authorities clearly prove that where, independently of a void commitment, there is a sufficient criminal charge, either in the depositions or otherwise, the Court will not discharge ; but that where there is no sufficient criminal charge they will. They, therefore, do fully bear out the position for which they are referred to in the paper in the Times, that Brett, inde- pendently of the warrant of remand, had full authority to detain Kelly. But it also seems to me that Ex parte Scott tends very strongly to prove that the right of a private person to arrest a person found committing a misdemeanor extends to every mis- demeanor ; for that case shows that in no case of m^isdemeanor would the Court discharge the prisoner, which proves that the custody is lawful. Now, if the custody was lawful when the habeas was obtained, or when the prisoner was remanded, how can it have been unlawful at any previous time ? The custody has from the first been for the same cause, and has in no respect changed in its character. Its lawfulness, therefore, at one time necessarily leads to the conclusion that it was always lawful. Of course this must be limited in general to the oases where the custody has all along been in England : where (as in Scoffs case) the original arrest was abroad, the custody, whatever it may have been previously, became ■». lawful custody as soon as the Ixxx Arrest without Warrant. priooner came into England, at which time the prisoner came within the jurisdiction of the English law. Although the party arresting must catch the offender in the act of committing the misdemeanor, he is not restricted to apprehending him whilst committing the offence — he may apprehend him upon the spot immediately after the offence, or upon fresh pursuit if he run away. In Hex v. Howarth (R. & M. 0. 0. B. 207) the prisoner was seen in an outhouse and a noise was heard among the boards there, the owner was fetched, and, after searching several places, the prisoner was found in another person's garden crouched down under a tree ; the jury found only an attempt to commit a. felony, and it was held that, as the prisoner was seen in the outhouse, and was taken on fresh pursuit before he had left the neighbourhood, it was the same as if he had been taken in the outhouse, or in running away from it : (see Rex v. Hunt, already cited ; Hanway v. Boidtbee, 1 M. & Rob. 14 ; 4 0. & P. 350 ; and Bex V. Fraser, R. & M. 0. 0. R. 419.) But the arrest must be upon fresh pursuit, and not after a lapse of time during which all pursuit has been abandoned. In Hex V Gardener (B. & M. 0. 0. R. 390), the prisoner was seen by a constable playing at thimble-rig between two and four p.m. in a fair ; the constable then tried to arrest him, but he escaped, and the constable could not find him till nine p.m., when the constable attempted to arrest him, and it was held that the arrest could not lawfully be made, as it was not on fresh pursuit (Addenda R. & M. xii.), though the jury found that the prisoner knew that the constable was attempting to arrest him for the offence committed in the fair : (see also Reg. v. Walker, Dears. 0. 0. 358.) Treason is felony and something more j wherever, therefore, there is authority to apprehend for felony, there is certainly authority to apprehend for treason. But a distinction may here well be noticed between them. In the case of felony there may be a great many things done for the purpose of accomplishing the felony, which do not amount to felony, as nothing amounts to felony, except what constitutes the person doing it either a principal or accessory before or after the fact. A recent case well illustrates what I mean. Williams gave poison to Edwards telling him that it was poison, and that he wanted to kill A7rest without Warrant. Ixxxi Vaughan, and directed him to go to Vaughan's house with it, and put it in some beer, and so poison Vaughan. Edwards went to Vaughan with the poison, told him what had passed, and gave up the poison. It was held that this was not the felony of attempting to administer poison within the 1 Vict. a. 85, s. 3 : (Eeg. T. Williams, \ Den. 0. C. 39.) But the same prisoner was afterwards convicted before that great Judge, Oresswell, 3., for the misdemeanor of doing the acts with the felonious intent : (Dears. 0. 0. 647.) But to provide weapons, powder, or poison, to put the King to death is treason : (1 Hale P. C. 108.) So to take a pistol, powder, and pellets, and to go towards the place where the. Queen is, with ". traitorous intent, is an overt act of treason: {Somervile's case, 1 And. 104.) Indeed, taking any ■ step in order to carry out a treasonable design is an overt act. Thus, taking a boat at the Surrey-stairs in Middlesex, in order to go on board a smack, with papers to be used in Prance for treasonable purposes, is an overt act in Middlesex: (^Lord Preston's case, i St. Tr. 406) ; for " every step taken for those purposes is an overt act " : (Fost. 196.) Nay, it has even been held that where the prisoner had said in Portugal, " I will kill the King, if I may come unto him," and he afterwards came into England for the same purpose, he was guilty of treason : (^Crokagan's case, Cro. Car. 332), on the ground that coming into England for the purpose of killing the King was an overt act: (Post. 202, 203.) Now, let us consider how this distinction between treason and felony may affect the authority to arrest. Let us first suppose that there is a number of persons who have committed treason, and that, one or more of them being imprisoned for it, the others combine to break open the prison and rescue them, in order that they may all prosecute their treasonable purposes, and that those who are in prison are participating in these designs. If the rescue were effected, there is no doubt all would be guilty of treason (as persons who rescue actual traitors are guilty of treason, if they know them to be such, although they have not previously joined in their treason). But suppose, in- stead of affecting their purpose, a baiTel of powder is brought and exploded for the purpose of effecting the designs I have men- tioned by blowing down the wall of a yard of the prison, the authorities I have cited seem to show that the procuring the e3 Ixxxii Arrest without Warrant. powder, the taking it to the prison, and the exploding it there, in fact, to use the words of Foster, " every step taken for those purposes was an overt act of treason." Every private person, therefore, not only might, but would be bound to, arrest any one of the persons doing any of these acts, if he had reasonable ground to believe that they were done for the purposes in question. But, on the other hand, if the offenders were imprisoned for felony only, the breaking open the prison and rescuing the offenders would only be felony, and consequently the attempt to break open the prison for that purpose would only be an attempt to commit a felony, and that attempt would be confined to the explosion, and would not include the steps preparatory to it. This will suSBoe to show how important it was to point out clearly that any private person has authority to arrest anyone caught in the act of attempting to commit any felony, and was indeed the principal cause which induced me to write this paper. It must be observed also that a criminal act coupled with cri- minal or felonious intention constitutes in many cases a misde- meanor, although the act be not so proximate to the intended offence as to constitute an attempt to commit it. Williams's case already cited affords one instance ; but it is impossible to lay down any definite rule as to this class of offences, as each must depend upon its particular circumstances. The best guide on this subject is the doctrine laid down by Lord Mansfield in Rex V. 6'coji[€H(Cald. 397), which mMexy. ff%ms(2Ea8tR.22) Lawrence, J., said "comprises all the principles of the former decision," that " so long as an act rests in bare intention it is not punishable by our law, but immediately when an act is done, the law judges not only of the act done, but of the intent with which it is done, and if accompanied with an unlawful and malicious intent, though the act itself would otherwise have been innocent, the intent being criminal, the act becomes criminal and punish- able." This is a plain and clear rule, and has been constantly acted upon. Thus, unlawfully having counterfeit coin with intent to utter it is no offence, but obtaining such coin with intent to utter it is a misdemeanor, and the same distinction has been held as to obscene prints : {Beg. v. Dugdale, 1 E. & B. 435.) Upon these authorities it would seem that procuring powder or arms Arrest without Warrant. Ixxxiii with Intent to commit a felony is a misdemeanor, for the procur- ing is an act done, and it is coupled with a criminal intent. And here it is right to notice a dictum or two which require to be properly understood. In Reg. v. Collins (L. & 0. 471) the prisoners were charged with an attempt to commit a felony, and Orompton, J. is reported to have said " Suppose a man were to buy a pistol with intent to rob and murder another in a lane, and the man who was to be murdered never came, the intent would not be enough without the attempt." This is equivocal ; as it might mean that it would not be enough to constitute a misdemeanor, as well as an attempt to commit a felony. But all doubt is removed by the much clearer statement in the report in 10 L. T. Rep. N. S. 581. Orompton, J. — " Suppose a man were to go down a lane armed with a pistol, with the intention to rob a particular person whom he expected would pass that way, and the person does not happen to come, would that be an attempt to rob the person ? " And this is quite in accordance with what Maule, J., said in Reg. v. Eagletan (Dears, 0. 0. 525), " The doubt may arise what is an atteng)t? Must it not be a proximate attempt? Does a man intending to murder, attempt to do so, if he buys a dagger or poison, but uses neither the one nor the other ? " It is clear that neither of these learned Judges did more than speak of an attempt to commit an offence, and it seems to me that they intended to put the case of what they considered to be an act coupled with a criminal intent, which did not amount to an attempt to commit an offence, and that their attention was not directed to the question whether that would constitute a misdemeanor, and their dicta certainly have no tendency to show that it would not. In this class of misdemeanor, which do not amount to an at- tempt to commit a felony, the right of a private person to arrest those who are caught committing them, depends upon the ques- tion whether the conclusion that I have drawn from the cases be right or not, viz., that that right extends to all misdemeanors where the offender is caught in the act. The main object of the Troason-Polony Act was to enable the Crown to treat such persons as felons whose Offences might in strictness be held to be treason, in oases where the offences were of a minor character, and it in no way affects the duty or right Ixxxiv Attempts to commit Crimes. to apprehend persons guilty of treason within the 25 Edw. 3, o. 2, or the unrepealed part of the 36 Geo. 3, o. 57. There are sundry other points which I might advert to, but this paper has already extended to a much greater length than I anticipated, and it is time to conclude. ATTEMPTS TO COMMIT CRIMES AND INDICTABLE ORIGINAL ACTS. In my paper upon the poweFto arrest in cases of misdemeanor, I touched upon attempts to commit offences and criminal acts, which amounted to misdemeanors, though they did not amount to attemps to commit offences ; but I did not go so fully into the nature of either of these classes of offences as I should have done if I had been writing a paper upon them. As, however, questions frequently arise respecting these offences, and as it is desirable to place them in as clear a light as may be, I will proceed to consider them as carefully as I can. It may be as well to premise that all acts which are done with a criminal intent, and are such as may subject those who do them to prosecution by indictment, may properly be divided into three classes : first, those which actually effect the crime itself ; secondly, those which fall short of effecting the crime, but approach so nearly to it as to constitute attempts; and lastly, those which are too remote from the crime itself to constitute attempts, but nevertheless are indictable as acts done with a criminal intent. With the crimes themselves, and with those who are participators in them, either as principals or accessories, this paper has nothing to do, except in so far as occasional reference to them may be made in order the better to illustrate any point affecting either of the other two classes. On the whole, it would seem to be the more expedient course to deal with acts done with a criminal intent before taking attempts to commit crimes into consideration, as a clear insight into the law affecting the former may help to give a clearer insight into the law relating to the latter. In the first place, it may bo well to explain a misapprehension, which has long prevailed, as to whether an act was necessary in Attempts to commit Grimes. IxxxV addition to a criminal intent in order to constitute an indictable offence at common law; a3 couBiderable doubt seems to have arisen from the inaoeui-ate use of the expression voluntas repii- tabatur pro facto, Braoton, treating of homicide per infortunium, says that if a man throwing a dart at a wild beast, or playing with his com- panion, and striking him jocosa levitate, kill a man, not, however, with the intention of killing, he ought to be acquitted ; " quia crimen non contrahitur nisi voluntas nocendi interoedat, et voluntas et propositum distinguunt maleficium, et furtum omnino ndn committitur sine affectu furandi;'' and he after- wards adds, " In maleficiis autem spectatur voluntas et non exitus, et nihil interest oooidat quis, an cauaam mortis praebeat :" (Braoton, Lib. III., u. 17, p. 136, i.) Now, it is quite clear from the context and the words used that Braoton did not mean a hare intention, or plotting of the death of a man by the offender ; but, as Lord Coke says, " He must causam mortis prcebere ; that is, declare the same by some open deed tending to the execution of his intent, or which might cause the death :" (3 Inst. 5.) Where a man's wife went away with her adulterer, and they compassed the death of the husband, and assaulted and struck him with weapons, so that he fell down as dead, but recovered ; and they were indicted, and this special matter was found by verdict, it was adjudged that the man should be hanged and the wife burnt: (15 Edw. 2, tit. Ooron. 383, cited 3 Inst. 5.) And Sir W. Beresford, O.J., of Common Bench, said that, before him and his companions, justices of oyer and terminer, a youth was arraigned for that he would have stolen the goods of his master, and went to his master's bed, and with a knife attempted with aU his force to cut his master's throat, and, on a special verdict, he was adjudged to be hanged, &o., quia voluntas rtputabatur pro facto. But Lord Coke adds in the margin, " Sed haec voluntas non intellecta fuit de voluntate nudis verbis aut scriptis propalata, sed mundo manifestata per apertum factum, id est cum quis dederat operam, quantum in ipso fuit, ad occidendum; et sic de similibus;" and he adds; "so it was not a bare compassing or plotting of the death of a man, either by word or writing (but) by such overt deed as is aforesaid, to manifest the same." Lord Coke, however, afterwards says that, before the Statute of Treason (25 Edw. 3, c. 2), " if a man had compassed Ixxxvi Attempts to commit Crimes. or imagined the death of the King, and had declared his compassing or imagination by words or writing, this had been high treason, and a sufficient overture by the ancient law :'' (3 Inst. 5.) Foster has, however, satisfactorily shown that none of Lord Coke's authorities bears out his position, and that the true explanation of them is that they refer to a meeting of conspirators, and a consultation between them for traitorous purposes: (Fost. 205, 206.) And thus Lord Coke is made consistent with himself, for, in 3 Inst. 140, he says, that "compassings or imaginations against the King by word, without an overt act, is a, high misprision ;" and " in case of high treason, he that knoweth it before it be done, and asseateth unto it, Is particeps criminis, and guilty of treason." By the 25 Edw. 3, stat. 5, c. 2, " if percase any man of this realm ride armed covertly or secretly with men of arms against any other to slay him, or rob him, or take him or retain him till he hath made fine or ransom for to have his deliverance, it shall be judged felony or trespass (i.e., misdemeanor), according to the laws of the land of old time used, and according as the case requireth." On which enactment Lord Coke (3 Inst. 161) remarks: "Concerning the point of felony, it must.be observed that at the making of that statute, and by the laws of the realm of old time used in such cases, when any purposed to slay, and declared it by such overt act, voluntas reputabatur pro facto, and so is this branch concerning that point to be understood." It is plain, therefore, that a criminal purpose declared by an overt act was indictable at common law ; and it is also clear that in this passage Lord Coke applied the words voluntas reputabatur pro facto to a criminal intent so declared by an overt act. In the 27 Ass. foL 137, pi. 38, Shardhill mentioned a case where a thief had assaulted a man feloniously, with intent to rob him, and it was advised by all the council, oxoept Stouf , that he should be hanged. And this case was cited and approved by Gascoigne, in the Tear Book, 13 Hen. 4, fol. 7, pi. 20 ; and the 25 Edw. 3, fol. 85, pi. 33, is to the same effect. Lord Hale says : " Although anciently an assault, to the intent to rob, or an intent to rob, was reputed felony voluntas reputabatur pro facto (25 Edw. 3, 42, which is a mistake for fol. 85, pi. 33 ; 13 Hen. 4, 7 ; per Gascoigne, 27 Ass. 38), yet the law is held otherwise at this day, and for a long time since the Attempts to commit Crim^. Ixxxvil tiniB of Edward III., and therefore if A. lie in wait to rob B., and assault him to that purpose, and require him to deliver his purse, yet if de facto he hath taken nothing from him, this is not felony, but only a misdemeanor, for which he is punish- able by fine and imprisonment:" (9 Edw. 4, 26, 6, pi. 36; 1 Hale, 532.) So that Lord Hale plainly used the maxim voluntas reputabatw pro facto as including an act done with a criminal intent. Hawkins says, " the bare intention to commit a felony is so very criminal that, at the common law, it was punishable as felony, where it missed its effect through some accident no way lessening the guilt of the offender" (1 Hawk, P. 0. m. 25, s. 3)j for which he cites Rex v. Bacon (1 Sid. 230 ; 1 Lev. 146). Bacon was indicted for offering lOOZ. to J. S. to murder Sir H. Orimstone, and, according to Levinz, the Court said, "anciently voluntas reputahatur pro facto in felony, and although it is not so now, it is a great offence and finable." But, according to Siderfin, the Court said that " although voluntas reputabatwr pro facto, so as to punish it as felony, yet it cannot (ceo ne poet) be punished as a misdemeanor.' But, according to both reports. Bacon was fined, &c. It is clear, therefore, that these dicta were applied to the act of offering the money coupled with the criminal intent; and, as Bacon was sentenced, the report in Siderfin must be erroneous. Hawkins also refers to Kelyng 24 ; but neither at that page nor elsewhere in Kelyng can I find any passage which bears on the question. Hawkins adds, " But it seems agreed, at this day, that felony shall not be imputed to a bare intention to commit it ; yet it is certain that the party may be very severely fined for such an intention." For which he cites Bacon's case (1 Lev. 146) (which requires, as we have seen, an act coupled with such an intent) and Bex v. Cowper (5 Mod. 206), which is to the same effect ; for there the prisoner was indicted for hiring a boat for twenty guineas, /ofed, malitiose, et proditorie, to assist the King's enemies. Curia : " The very intention to commit treason is regarded in the law, and any preparation to assist the King's enemies is a prejudice to the pubhc, and therefore an offence at common law. Our actions are governed by intentions, as qualified by them ; so that in divers cases the intention makes the act more or less criminal;" and the prisoner was heavily fined. Ixxxviii Attempts to commit Crimes. The result of this long — but I trust not too long — examina- tion of the old authorities is to clear up the matter completely. A mere intent never was indictable by the common law; consequently the expression voluntas r^mtobatur pro facto was inaccurately applied. But where there was not only an intent, but an attempt to carry that intent into execution, the offence ■was held at the common law to be as great as if the intended crime had been perpetrated ; and I think rightly so, for as the guilt of the offender depends upon his criminal intention and his acts, the amount of his criminality when he has done all that in him lies to effect his purpose is identically the same, whether his attempt succeed or not. And it is not unworthy of remark that in the oases of attempts to rob and murder, the legislature has expressly restored them to the class of felony, and some of them were till recently punishable with death, which tends to show that the original common law rule was at least as good as treating them as misdemeanors only. Lastly, these old authorities tend very strongly to show that any act coupled with a criminal intent was always indictable at common law, and the statute of the 25 Edw. '3, before cited, plainly shows that such acts were not confined to what amounted to attempts to commit crimes, especially when it is remembered that the same statute required an overt act in treason, and that many acts have been held to be overt acts within that statute which, if the offence had been felony, would not have amounted to attempts. We may now proceed to the oases in which acts done with a criminal intent have been holden to be indictable as misde- meanors. Where an information stated that a deed was produced on the trial of a cause, by which a verdict was obtained for the defendant, and that Johnson agreed with another person to give him 350?. to prove that the said deed was forged, which was stated to be done malitios^, with the other usual adverbs, and Johnson was convicted, it was held that this was a misdemeanor; for witnesses ought to come unbiassed, and not affected by money; and though this was not subornation of perjury, it was an endeavour to procure one to get another to prove a deed forged : (JRex v. Johnson, 2 Show. R. 1.) Where an information alleged that the defendant unlawfully Attempts to commit Grimes. Ixxxix and corruptly promised to pay W. H., who had a vote in an elec- tion of the mayor of a town, 500?. upon condition that he woul d give his vote in a certain way, it was objected that, if the defendant made such a promise, it will be no crime without showing the fact done, that the money was paid and accepted by W. H. But the Gom't were of opinion that to bribe persons, either by giving money or promises, to vote at elections of members of corporations, which are created for the sake of public government, is a misdemeanor : (iJea; v. Ptympton, 2 Lord Baym. 1377.) By the 8 & 9 Will. 3, «. 26, a. 1, any person who knowingly had in his possession, without lawful authority or excuse, any instrument which would make the figure of both or either of the sides of any gold or silver coin, was guilty of treason. A count alleged that the prisoner, without lawful authority, had in his possession two iron stamps, each of which would make the figure of one of the sceptres made on half-guineas, with intent to make the impression of sceptres on sixpences, and to colour them of the colour of gold, and utter them for half-guineas. Another count alleged that the prisoner had in his possession a piece of silver, coloured of the colour of gold, and made to resemble a half-guinea, with intent to utter it. On the- case being brought into the King's Bench, after conviction Lord Hardwicke, C. J., said : " As to the first part of the indictment, I doubted whether it was not high treason within the 8 & 9 Will. 3, c. 26, s. 1 ; but it is not at all clear it would be so, because this is only to stamp part of one side of the coin, viz., putting sceptres. Then is it a misdemeanor at common law ? And it did not occur to me that having in one's custody, vrithout any act done, was a misde- meanor. As to the second part, I doubted whether any prece- dent could be found to show that the bare having counterfeit money in one's possession with intent to utter it, without uttering it, was an offence." But the three other Judges, in the absence of the Chief Justice, held the conviction right on the first count. Lee, J. : " It is certain that a bare intention is not punishable, and yet, when joined with acts whose circumstances may be tried, it is so ; so ah action innocent in itself may be made punishable by an intention joined to it, as loading wool with intention to transport it, as Lord Hale says : (1 Hale P. 0. 229.) Now, the 8 & 9 Will. 3, o. 26, has considered the xc Attempts to commit Crimes. having as an act, for by that statute it is treason to have know- ingly any instrument, &o., in his possession ; and though the word ' knowingly ' is added, yet that is SCn act of the mind only ; and the only act capable of trial in the offence against the statute is the having in possession. A U that is necessary in this case is an act' charged and a criminal intention joined to that act ;" {Rex V. Suttcm, C. T. H. 370 ; 2 Sfr. 1074.) This case has been since overruled, as we shall see ; but it is clear that it was decided upon the true principle, though that principle was not properly applicable to the case, according to the subsequent decisions. It has long been settled that a man cannot be guilty of arson at common law by setting fire to a house of which he is in possession as tenant: {Holmes's case, Oro. Oar.-^376.) But if the house so set fire to be in a town, or so near to other houses as to create danger to them, it is a great misdemeanor. In some cases the indictment has laid the setting fire to be with intent to bum the adjoining houses (Holmes's case) ; but in others the indict- ment has merely stated that the houses were adjoining to that set fire to by the prisoner. And such indictments are grounded on the fact that such an act must necessarily cause danger and terror to the neighbourhood. In Bex V. Scqfield (Oald. 397), the indictment alleged that the prisoner, maliciously intending to set fire to the house of J. Ramsay, of which the prisoner was possessed for a term of years, put a lighted candle into a closet of the house, which was contiguous and adjoining to dwelling-houses in New Bond- street, with intent to bum the house of the said J. Bamsay ; and this count was held good after verdict, and Lord Mansfield, 0. J., said : " So long as an act rests in bare intention it is not punish- able by our laws ; but immediately when an act is done, the law judges not only of the act done, but of the intent with which it is done ; and if it is coupled with an unlawful and malicious intentj though the act itself would otherwise have been innocent, the intent being criminal, the act becomes criminal and punish- able." And his lordship expressly approved of the principles upon which Rex v. Sutton was decideid, and did not intimate any doubt as to the correctness of that decision. In Rex V. Higgins (2 East-E. 5), a count alleged that the prisoner did falsely, wickedly, and unlawfully solicit and incite Attempts to commit Crimes. xci J. D. to take, embezzle, and steal a quantity of twist, the property of his masters ; and, upon error after sentence, it was objected that a bare solicitation or incitement to commit an offence was not indictable, unless it were accompanied by some overt act towards carrying the intent into execution ; but it was held that the solicitation was an act ; the offence did not consist in mere intention ; for in soliciting J. D. to commit the felony, the prisoner did an act towards carrying his intent into execu- tion, and Lawrence, J., fully adopted the rule laid down by Lord Mansfield in Rex v. Scofield. In the preceding case several older cases were approved. One was a case before Adams, B., tried at Shrewsbury, where the Judges unanimously held that an attempt to suborn one to commit perjury was a misdemeanor. Another was an indictment charging that the defendant, knowing that J. 0. was indicted for forgery, endeavoured to keep away a material witness for the Crown: {Bex v. Lady Lawley, Fitzg. 263.) A third was an indictment for soliciting one to kill the Chevalier d'Eon. And a fourth was an information for an attempt to influence a jury- man in giving a verdict : (Young's case.") There is a class of cases which well illustrates and supports Lord Mansfield's rule in Rex v. Scofield, and by which it is settled that procuring base coin with intent to utter it, is a misdemeanor (JRex v. FuUer, R. & R. 308) ; but that having base coin in possession with intent to utter it is not, on the ground that procuring is an act done, but that having in possession cannot be considered as such an act. A second count charged the prisoner with having counterfeit coin in his possession, knowing it to be counterfeit, with intent to circulate it. At a meeting of the Judges " they relied much upon the authority of Rex v. Sutton, and the cases there cited, in forming their opinion, and were then inclined to think this a misdemeanor. But, on considering the case again, the majority of the Judges seemed to be of opinion that having in his possession, with the terms ' knowingly,' &a., annexed to it, could not be considered an act, and that an intent without an act was not a misdemeanor, and they considered Rex v. Sutton as untenable :" (Rex v. Heath, R. & R. 184-.) And in a subsequent case the Judges were unanimously of opinion that a similar count charged no offence : (Rex V. Stewart, R. & R. 288.) Indeed the question seems to be xcii Attempts to commit Crimes. fully settled, and' the principle has been applied to the case of indecent prints. Thus it has been held that the procuring indecent prints, with intent to publish them, is a misdemeanor ; for the procuring is an act done in the commencement of misdemeanor, the misdemeanor being the wicked offence of pnblishing obscene prints. But preserving and keeping such prints in possession with a like intent is not a misdemeanor, for it is an intent unaccompanied by any act, and the prisoner might have procured them without any intent to publish them, and have afterwards conceived that intention ; (Dugdale v. The Queen, 1 E. & B. 435, in which the preceding cases as to coin were fully recognised.) But where on searching a prisoner a quantity of bad shillings inclosed in paper was found in his breeches' pocket, and another packet in his waisteoat pocket, and each parcel contained about twenty bad shilhngs carefully wrapped up in soft paper, and separated from each other by folds of similar paper; it was held that this possession, unaccounted for, and without any- thing to induce a belief that the prisoner was the maker, was evidence of procuring with intent to utter: (Jiex v. Fuller, R. & E. 308.) And in a previous case, where the prisoner had delivered a box packed up, containing a very large number of bad shillings and sixpences, at a coach-office to the book-keeper, the Judges seem to have been of opinion that these facts afforded grounds for a good indictment, by stating that the prisoner acquired or procured the bad money with intent to circulate it, or packed it np or delivered it to the book-keeper, with intent to circulate it : (Rex v. Heath, R. & R. 184, note a.) In Rex V. Vaughan (4 Burr. R. 2494) the Court of King's Bench granted a criminal information against Vaughan for sending a letter to the Duke of Grafton, then First Lord of the Treasury, containing an offer to pay 5000?. into the hands of Mr. H. Newcome, to be delivered by him to the person who should procure a patent of the reversion of the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the Island of Jamaica, for the lives of three persons; which office was in the disposition of the King, and passed by a grant under the Great Seal. And the Court held that a great officer at the head of the Ti-easury, and in the King's confidence, selling his interest with the King in procuring an office, would be guilty of a, crime at common law; that Attempts to commit Crimes. xoiii wherever it is a crime to take, it ia a crime to give ; they are reciprocal. And in many cases, especially in bribery at elections to Parliament, the attempt is a crime ; it is complete on his side who offers it. And so also must an ofEer to bribe a privy councillor to advise the King to grant an ofBce to ^ny person : (See the indictment in this case, 3 Oh. 0. L. 683, which alleged the sending of the letter, &c., but did not in terms allege an attempt to bribe.) Where an'indiotment alleged that the defendant, intending to do great bodily harm to R. G. Thomas, and to break the peace, sent to Thomas a scandalous and malicious letter, which charged him with having behaved like a blackguard, with intent to provoke Thomas to challenge the defendant, it was objected that, "although the sending a challenge to flght may, on account of its direct and immediate tendency^ to a breach of the peace, be an indictable offence, yet that a mere endeavour to provoke a person by a letter so to do, such endeavour, not in itself having a direct and immediate tendency to a breach of the peace, nor being alleged to be done with that intent, but having only a tendency to provoke a challenge, and a challenge having only a tendency to a breach of the peace, and not being itself a breach of the peace, was too remotely dangerous to the public peace to be the subject of indictment as a substantive misdemeanor." Bat the Court held that, " although the intended effect may not have been produced, yet the means calculated and likely to produce such an effect have been used. The letter was as much an act done towards the mUdemeanor meant to he accomplished^ namely, a challenge, as it was in Bex v. Vaughan, where the misdemeanor meant to be accomplished by the letter offering to bribe a minister of state, was the inducing such minister corruptly to recommend to an ofHce of public trust: (^Rex t. Philips, 6 East R. W^ We will now take the case of Reg. v. Roberts (Dears, 0. 0. 539), which requires a careful examination in order to prevent its leading to the supposition that an act done with a criminal intent must be proximate to the offence in order to make it indictable. By the 37 Geo. 3, u. 126, ». 2, any pei-son counter- feiting any coin, not the coin of this realm, but resembling any coin of any foreign prince or state, was mnrlo guilty of folouy. A count stated that the prisoner made two dies, upon one of xciv Attempts to commit Crimes. •which was engraved the figure of one of the sides of a silver half-dollar of the republic of Peru, and upon the other side of which was engraved the figure of the other aide of the said coin, with intent by means of them feloniously to make counter- feit Peruvian half-dollars ; and so the jurors said that the prisoner unlawfully did attempt feloniously to counterfeit Peruvian half dollars. There were several other counts varying the statement as to the acts of the prisoner ; but all alleged that he attempted to counterfeit coin. The prisoner bad caused to be made by a die-sinker the necessary dies for making a counterfeit half-dollar of the republic of Peru; the dies could not alone produce it, a press, copper blanks, galvanic battery, and a preparation of silver being also necessary for that purpose; but the prisoner was not proved to have procured either press, blanks, or preparation of silver. The jury found that he intended to procure the dies and other necessary apparatus in order therewith to coin counterfeit Peruvian half-dollars, and to make a few of them in England to try whether the apparatus would answer before sending it out to Peru, to be there used in making the counterfeit coin ; and upon a case reserved upon the questions, whether the prisoner under these circumstances was guilty of an offence against the laws of this country, and whether any of the counts alleged such offence, it was contended that the acts found did not amount to an attempt to make 'counterfeit foreign coin, and that the acts, although coupled with intent to coin in England, did not amount to an offence. There was no foundation for the proposition that any act dona towards the commission of a felony or misdemeanor is an indictable offence. The act must be immediately connected with the offence. And Reg, V. Eagleton (Dears, C. 0. 515), was cited to show that acts remotely leading to the commission of an offence are not to be considered as attempts to commit it. And the doctrine that an act, coupled with an intent, is indictable was denied, and Hex v. Sutton and Rex v. Heath were said not to be law. But the Court, without hearing the counsel for the Crown, held the conviction right. Jervis, C.J. : " This is not an indictment for an attempt to commit a statutable, offence, as was the case in Reg. V. Williams (1 Den. C. G.^oap, where the charge was an attempt to administer poison. Here there is no direct attempt to coin, but the indictment is founded on a criminal intent, Attempts to commit Crimes. xcv coupled with an act immediately connected with the offence. It is difficult, and perhaps impossible, to lay down a clear and definite rule, to define what is, and what is not, such an act done, in furtherance of a criminal intent, as will constitute an offence.; at all events, I shall not attempt to do so. Many acts, coupled with the intent, would not be sufficient. For instance, if a man intends to commit a murder, and is seen to walk towards the place of the contemplated scene, that would not be enough; but although it is sometimes difficult to say whether a case comes within or ranges without the line, it is not difficult to say that the act done in this case is one which falls within it." Parke, B. : "I quite agree with the law laid down in Beg. v. Eagleton, that an attempt at committing a misdemeanor is not an indictable attempt unless it is an act directly approximating to the commission of an offence, and I think this act is a sufficient approximation." Wightman, J. : " No doubt the act was done with intent to commit a felony, and is sufficient to support such an indictment as the present one. It is an act immediately connected with the commission of the offence ; and in truth the prisoner could have no other object than to commit the offence." Oresswell, J., agreed " that the act done in this case is sufficiently proximate to the offence." Now it seems clear that Jervis, C.J., treated the indictment as simply charging acts done with a criminal intent; but that Parke, B., clearly treated the indictment as charging an attempt to coin ; and the judgments of Wightman, J., and Oresswell, J., are quite consis- tent with that view ; and that is quite in accordance with the indictment. It is very remarkable that the form of the indict- ment was never refered to expressly by any one. It is clear, however, that, in whatever way this decision may be viewed, it merely amounts to a determination that the prisoner was rightly convicted upon the evidence adduced on the trial. No rule as to the proximity of the act to the offence was laid down; on the contrary, the attempt to do so was studiously avoided. There is not even a single ohiter dictum, still less any decision to support the proposition that an act done with a criminal intent must be immediately connected with the intended. offence. On the contrary, all the authorities, as well as the principle and reason on which they are founded, are the other way. The only ques- tions in a case of this kind are, " Did the prisoner intend to xcvi Attempts to commit Grimes. commit, or to cause to be committed, an indictable offence, and did he do an act with that criminal intent?" Proximity to, or remoteness from, the intended offence has nothing at all to do with the latter question. * The law of treason may well serve to confirm our views. In speaking of this law Foster says : " It considereth the wicked imaginations of the heart in the same degree of guilt as if carried into actual execution from the moment measures appear to have been taken to render them effectual; and, therefore, if con- spirators meet and consult how to kill the king, though they do not then fall upon any scheme for that purpose, this is an overt act of compassing his death ; and so are all means made use of, be it advice, persuasion, or command, to incite or encourage others to commit the fact, or to join in the attempt, and every person who but assenteth to any overtures for that purpose will be involved in the same guilt:" (Post. 195.) So to provide weapons, powder, or poison to put the king to death is treason (1 Hale, P. 0. 108); in fact, every step taken in order to carry out a treasonable design is an overt act : (Fost. 196 : Somervik's case, 1 And. 104 ; Fost. 202, 203.) Now, these authorities lead to the conclusion that, whatever in treason would amount to an overt act, would in inferior offences be indictable ; for the ground upon which these authorities rest is, that there is an act coupled with a criminal intent; and the only difference between such acts in case of treason and inferior offences is, that the character of the offence would differ, and lead to different punishments. There are some authorities in treason which make me pause before I assent to the position that going to a place with intent to commit a murder is not an indictable offence. In Lord Preston's case (i St. Tr. 406), it was objected that no overt act was proved in Middlesex, where all the overt acts were laid, for he was taken with the papers containing a scheme for invading the kingdom in Kent. But the Court told the jury that if they believed that his lordship had an intention of going into Prance and carrying those papers thither for the purposes charged in the indictment, " his taking boat at Surrey stairs, which are in Middlesex, in order to go on board a smack which had been procured to transport him to France, was a suiHcient overt act in Middlesex. Every st^ taken for those pin-poses was an overt act :" (Fost. 196.) Orohagan at Lisbon said, " I will kill the king Attempts to commit Crimes. xcvii (meaning the King of England), if I may come unto him," and he afterwards came into England for the same purpose ; and both Lord Hale (1 Hale, 116) and Foster (Post. 202) agree that the coming into England was an overt act ; and Foster says, " the words could not be so properly deemed an overt act of treasom as an evidence against the man out of his own mouth quo animo he came into England. The traitorous intention, proved by his words, converted an action, innocent in itself, into an overt act of treason:" (CroAajAare's case, Cro. Oar. 332.) If the coming into England with a traitorous intent is an overt act of treason, how can it be otherwise than an indictable offence to go towards a place with intent to commit murder? The locomotion of the body is as much an act in the one case as in the other, and the evil intent is coupled with the act in the one case as much as in the other. No doubt a man may have an intent in his mind to commit au offence, and do an act, which will not be indictable ; c. g., he may go to bed with an intent in his mind to commit a murder the next day. But this is widely different from going towards a place with intent to commit a murder, as this is a step towards committing the crime. So in the cases of misdemeanor, where, as in treason, all are principals, it would seem that whatever would make a person a principal, if the misdemeanor were completed, would, if it were not completed, render him guilty of a misdemeanor in doing an act with a criminal intent. Thus, the prisoner, who made an affidavit in order fraudulently to obtain money out of the Court of Chancery, but was absent when the false pretence was made, was held to be a principal in obtaining the money: (iJej. V. Moland, 2 M. C. C. R. 276.) But if the fraud had not succeeded, he might have been indicted for making the affidavit with the criminal intent. It would also seem to be clear that whatever would make a man an accessory before the fact, if the felony were committed, would, if it were not committed, make him guilty of a mis- demeanor. In Rex V. Higgins, Grose, J., said : " If a robbery were actually committed, the inciter would be a felon. The incitement, however, Is the offence, though differing in its conse- quences, according as the offence solicited, if it be felony, is com- mitted or not." That is, if the felony be committed, the incitement is felony ; if it be not committed, the incitement is a misdemeanor. / xcviii Attempts to commit Crimes. Foster says ; *' Whoever procureth a felony to be committed, though it be by the intervention of a third person, is an acces- sory before the fact. For what is there in the notion of com- manding, hiring, counselling, aiding, or abetting, which may not be effected by the intervention of »■ third person, without any direct immediate connection between the first mover and the actor ? A. biddeth his servant to hire somebody to murder B., and furnisheth him with money for that purpose ; the servant procureth C, a person whom A. never saw nor heard of, to do it ; is not A., who is manifestly the first mover or contriver of the murder, an accessory before the fact? It would be a reproach to the justice of the kingdom to suppose he is not;'' (Post. 125.) And he cites The Earl of Somerset's case (1 St. Tr. 335), where the Lord Chancellor directed the Peers triers, and all the Judges present concurred with him, that the only poin* in issue was whether the earl caused or procured the murder or not; and accordingly the earl was found guilty upon evidence which satisfied his peers that he had contributed to the murder by the intervention of his lady and of Sir J. Elwys and Franklin, who were themselves no more than accessories, without any proof that he had ever conversed with Weston, the only principal in the murder, or had corresponded with him directly by letter or message: (Fost. 126.) In this case, if the murder had not been committed, all who incited Weston would have been guilty of an indictable offence by doing acts with a felonious intent. We may next consider attempts to commit offences. What is an attempt to commit an offence ? This is a question very much easier to ask than to answer; and as far as I am competent to judge, no general rule can be laid down upon the subject, but each aase must depend upon its own particular circumstances. As the means by which, and the modes in which, crimes may be committed are innumerable, so the modes in which attempts to commit crimes may be made must be innumerable also ; and not only so, but the nature of one attempt to commit a crime may totally vary from the nature of another attempt to commit the same crime. Thus, o, murder may be committed by a single stab, and so an attempt to murder may be made by a single stab ; whilst, on the other hand, a murder may be committed by administering small doses of poison at intervals daring a considerable space of time, in such a manner that the Attempts to commit Crimes. xcix death ia the result of the combined effect of all the poisoninga, and would not have been oauaed by one or even the greater part of them. In such a case, if death had not ensued, although the poisoner might well be convicted of an administration of poieon with intent to murder by proof even of one administration of poison, yet a single administration could not, perhaps, be con- sidered a proof of an attempt to murder, both because the murder was not intended to be committed by it, and because it could not he committed by it. These supposed cases may serve to show under what varied circumstances attempts to commit offences may have to be considered, and yet these cases are confined to acts which would have actually been the means of committing the crime, if it had been effected. It seems, how- ever, to he clear that wherever the act or acts done are such that, if they had produced their intended effect, the crime would have bean completed, an attempt to commit that crime is proved ; and, consequently, upon every charge of an attempt to commit an offence, the primary consideration would seem to be, whether the acts done by the prisoner could have effected the crime intended. It is quite obvious, however, that attempts to commit crimes cannot be hmited to such attempts as have just been mentioned ; but that acts uot necessarily forming the means, or even part of the means, of effecting the crime may, in some cases, suffice to prove an attempt to commit the crime, and the great difficulty is to determine where the line is to be drawn. No assistance can be obtained from the dictionaries as to the meaning of the term " attempt," for the explanation that " to attempt " is "to try or to endeavour," is idem per idem, and helps not at all, and the better course will be to review the cases which have been decided, and see how far they may help us towards a description of what constitutes an attempt ; or, if they fail to furnish such a description, how far they may serve as guides in any case that may arise. "*j' By both sect. 3 and sect. 4 of the 1 Vict. a. 85, " whosoeveiii', shall, by drawing a trigger, or in any other manner, attempt to discharge any kind of loaded arms at any person, 'with any of the intents therein specified, waa made guilty of felony. On an indictment, which contained counts on both these sections, it appeared that the prisoner either half or full cocked a pistol, /2 Attempts to commit Crimes. and pointed the muzzle at the proaecntor, and the finger of his right hand was on the trigger, but a bystander prevented the trigger from going back. Parke, B. ; " The charge of felony cannot be supported, as it is not proved that the prisoner drew the trigger. The words ' in any other manner ' in the statute mean something analogous to drawing the trigger, which is the proximate cause of a loaded arm going off. Suppose, for instance, you had a match lock, and put a match to it, and the gun did not go off ; that would be a case within the act." And again : " The object of the act was to punish proximate attempts ; that is, those attempts which immediately lead to the discharge of loaded arms. Therefore, if a person drew the trigger, and the gun was loaded, the offence would be complete, though the gun did not go off, and though (the cook) did not happen to strike the percussion cap." . . - . " And so since the newly invented fire-arms, if a man with a hammer were to strike the cap, that would be felony under this act:" (Reg. v. St. George, 9 C. & P. 483.) This decision may, perhaps, be supported upon the ground that, as the statute had made the "drawing u, trigger " an attempt in express terms, it must be taken to exclude an attempt to draw a trigger, otherwise an attempt to make an attempt would be within the act. I am well aware that Lord Wensleydale was, at a time later than this decision, of opinion that if a statute specified, as this does, one particular, and then added general words, the general words must be limited to things ejusdem generis with the single particular so specified. Now it is clearly settled by a multitude of cases, of which Sandiman v. Breach (7 B. & 0. 96), may be considered as the leading one, that where a statute uses several words efusdem generis, and then adds general words to them, these general words are to be limited to persons or things ^'usdem generis with the persons or things previously specified ; and the reason is that the specification of sundry persons or things efusdem generis shows that the Legislature was providing for that particular class alone. Now this rule and the reason on which it rests are directly in the teeth of inferring from the mention of one thing that general words added to it must be limited to things ejusdem generis. It is very true that there were several decisions upon the words of the 9 Geo. 4, c. 31, s. 14, " secret burying or other- wise disposing of the dead body " of a <:hild, which would tend to Attempts to commit Crimes. ci support Lord Wensleydale's opinion, but these decisions were all overruled by Reg. v. Goldthorpe (2 M. 0. C. 244), where it was held that any concealment of the body, whether intended to be final or temporary, was within the act : (^Beg. v. Famham, 1 Oox Orim. Cas. 349, per Parke, B.) And in Salkeld v. Johnson (1 Hall & Twells, 329), where the question turned upon the construction of the 2 & 3 Will, i, o. 100, s. 1, which speaks of " any exemption from or discharge of tithes by composition real or oiherwise^^^ Lord Gottenbam held that the words "by composi- tion real or otherwise " were " tantamount to an enumeration of every possible ground of discharge." And this ruling is quite in accordance with the common usage of such expressions. If we talk of sending a letter " by post or otherwise," every mode by which a letter may be sent is plainly included. The proper construction, therefore, of the words, "by drawing a trigger or in any other manner," which are repeated in the 24 & 25 Vict. u. 100, ss. 14, 18, seems to be that they include any means whatever by which an attempt to discharge loaded arms can be made. Where on a similar indictment the prisoner said to the prosecutor, "Tou are a dead man," took out a blunderbuss from kis coat, and the muzzle of it was towards the side of the room where the prosecutor was ; but it was not pointed at him, and not up to the shoulder, but as low as a person could hold it, and whatever the prisoner's intention was it was prevented by a bystander laying hold of him ; it was held that an attempt to discharge the blunderbuss was not proved ; there must be something more than the mere presenting of the blunderbuss, some act must be shown to have been done by the prisoner to satisfy the jury that he did in fact attempt to discharge the blunderbuss : (^Meg. v. Lewis, 9 0. & P. 523.) This ruling entirely accords with what we have contended to be the right construction of the act. On an indictment for attempting to administer poison, it appeared that the prisoner had put some salts of sorrel in a sugar basin, in order that the prosecutor might take it with his tea, and the prosecutor and his wife took some of it with their tea, and discovered that something was wrong, and this led to a discovery of the poison ; Wightman, J., held that if the prisoner pat the poison in the sugar intending that it should be taken) cii Attempts to commit Crimes. that was an atti^mpt to administer it : (,Iieg. v. Dale, 6 Oox Orim. Gas. 14.) The taking of the tea into the mouth by the prosecutor in this case was just the same in point of law as if the prisoner had poured it into Jihe proaeoutor's mouth. Where a count charged that the prisoner falsely pretended to W. 0. Nutman, a relieving officer, that he, the prisoner, had supplied certain loaves of bread to a pauper of a certain weight, which they were not, by means whereof the prisoner had attempted to obtain a sum of money from the guardians of the poor, and it appeared that the prisoner had coatracted to supply the poor with loaves of bread of three and a half pounds each, at seven pence per loaf, but had in fact delivered to sundry paupers loaves which he knew to be deficient in weight ; and the practice was for the relieving officer to give the paupers tickets specifying how much bread they were to receive, and they took these tickets to the prisoner, who ought have delivered the bread mentioned in them to the paupers, and in the ensuing week he returned the tickets to the relieving officer, aiid was thereupon credited in the account with the guardians with the weight of bread mentioned in the tickets, and the money would be paid to the prisoner at the time mentioned in the contract ; and the prisoner had so delivered the tickets to the relieving officer, and obtained credit in the account for the amount of the number of pounds falsely represented to have been delivered : it was held, first, that the returning the tickets by the defendant was a representation by him that he had delivered a certain number of loaves of a certain weight j and, secondly, that he had been guilty of an attempt to obtain the money — ^Parke, B., saying: " We have had great doubt whether the obtiining credit in the account, though undoubtedly a necessary step towards obtaining the money, can be deemed an attempt to do so. The mere intention to commit a miademe.iaor is not criminal. Some act is required, and we do not think that all acts towards commit- ting a misdemeanor are indictable " (i.e., as attempts).* " Acts remotely leading towards the commission of the offence are not to be considered as attempts to commit it, but acts immediately connected with it are ; and if in this case after the credit with • The context shows this must be the meaning, especially as the only question was whether the prisoner had been guilty of an attempt Attempts to commit Crimes. ciii the relieving oflSoer for the fraudulent overcharge, any further sty) on the part of the prisoner had been necessary to obtain pay- ment, as the making out a further account, or producing the vouchers to the board, we should have thought that the obtaining credit in account with the relieving officer would not have been sufficiently proximate to the obtaining of the money. But on the statement in this case no other act on the part of the prisoner would have been required. It was the last act, depending on him- self, towards the payment of the money, and therefore it ought to be considered as an attempt :"(iJej. v. Eaghton, Dears. C. 0. 376, 515.) This case is open to several observations. The indictment alleged the false pretences as the attempt, and did not mention the obtaining credit at all, the judgment proceeds upon the latter only. Now, it does not appear that the prisoner was present when the entry was made by the relieving officer, but rather the contrary ; in either case, however, he was the innocent agent of the prisoner, and here arises a difficulty. Though not stated, it is clearly to be inferred from the case, that the book in which this credit in account was entered, would, in the regular course, have been produced to the guardians by the relieving officer, and that thereupon they would have authorised or made the payment, and there can be no doubt that the prisoner delivered the tickets to the relieving officer in order that this course might be pursued j the relieving officer, therefore, would be the prisoner's innocent agent in producing the account to the guardians, and the case would, on the supposition that he had so produced it, be just the same as if the prisoner had entered the account and produced it himself to the guardians. But the case itself was just the same as if the prisoner had entered the account in the book intending to produce it to the guardians, and the fraud had been discovered before he did so. And here it may be well to mention a case which may materially assist us in considering this state of things. In Rex V. Brisac (4 East R. 163) the prisoners were indicted in Middlesex for conspiring to cheat the Grown by fabricating false vouchers of payments for provisions, and sending them to the commissioners for victualling the navy. All the acts in which the prisoners took part were done on the high seas, at Brassa Sound, or in Shetland ; but a bill of exchange, and, as far civ Attempts to commit Crimss. as can be inferred from the report, the vouchers also, had been sent by the post to the commissioners, and delivered to them in Middlesex ; at all events, all of them had been delivered to them by innocent agents. It was held that the trial was well had in middleses, for " the delivering the vouchers and the presenting the bill of exchange to the commissioners in Middlesex were the acts of both the prisoners ; " " for the persons who innocently delivered the vouchers were mere instruments in their hands for that purpose ; the crime of presenting these vouchers was ex- clusively their own." Now, it seems clear that in that case the presentation of the vouchers, and not the putting them in the post, would be the attempt; and so it would seem that in this case the presentation of the book, and not the making the pretences to the relieving officer, or the entry in the accounts, would be the attempt. The fallacy in the judgment seems to lie in the assumption that no further step on the part of the prisoner would have been necessary to obtain payment. That, no doubt, is correct as to any personal act; but the point is, that other steps on his behalf were necessary to be taken by an innocent agent ; and here let it be observed that anyone who does any act, whether inten- tionally or not, which tends to further the design of a criminal, is that criminal's agent, and not only the agent of the person intended to be injured, but even the person intended to be injured, may be the prisoner's innocent agent. K a man set a, spring gun intending that it may be let off by a person passing the place where it is set, and that person lets it off, he is the prisoner's innocent agent in so doing. Assuming, therefore, that the relieving officer was the agent of the guardians, C. might also be the agent of the prisoner in presenting the book, which was necessary in order to enable the prisoner to obtain the money, and clearly for his benefit alone. Reg. v. Garrett (Dears. 0. 0. 232) seems to be the converse of this case upon this point. There, the prisoner having obtained a circular letter of credit on the Union Bank for 210Z., altered it to 5210?., and obtained several sums at St. Petersburg on drafts on the Union Bank from Messrs. Wilson, whose London house afterwards presented one of these drafts to the Union Bank, but payment was refused, as the fraud had been discovered. It was held that the London house were not the agents of the prisoner in pre- Attempts to commit Crimes. ov senting the draft. Coleridge, J. (assuming the question to be whether, if the money had been obtained from the Union Bank, the case would have been within the act), said, " It is quite clear it cannot be said the defendant actually obtained the money himself, nor do I think he obtained it by means of any agent. The obtaining must be either by the party's desire or intention, or far his benefit; but there is no foundation for saying that the money would have been obtained in this case either in one of these ways or the other." Piatt, B. : " It cannot be said that a party who presents a cheque for his own benefit is the agent of another who receives no benefit whatever." If, however, the presentation by the London house had been in order to obtain the money for the prisoner, there can be no doubt that it would have been held that he had been guilty of an attempt to obtain the money, on the ground that the presen- tation by the London house was made by the innocent agents of the prisoner. In all cases where an innocent agent does anything in further- ance of the design of a guilty person, the acts of the former are, in point of law, the acts of the latter. If, for instance, an offender send an innocent agent to make a false pretence, and he makes it, it is just the same as if the offender had made the false pretence himself : (^Reg. v. Butcher, Bell C. 0. 6.) In consider- ing, therefore, what is an attempt where acts are done by an innocent agent, those acts must be looked at as if they were done by the offender himself. And it is to be observed that, where an act is done by an innocent agent, this act is to be con- sidered as the act of all the guilty parties, though the innocent agent may have been employed by one of them in the absence of the rest, and consequently the rule as to principal and accessory is inapplicable to such a, case : (iJejr. v. Bull, 1 Cox Crim. Gas. 281.) Both in treason and misdemeanor all who are engaged in the crime are principals, the act of each in accordance with the common purpose being considered as the act of all. But in felony (except where the parties are in company at the time) the act of one is not considered as the act of the rest; in other words, the person who does an act in such a case " is not the agent of anyone:" (Per Alderson, B., Reg. v. Bull) The last reported Crown case may well be mentioned here. A watch was stolen at Liverpool, and Rogers forwarded by railway from /3 on Attempts to commit Crimes. Liverpool a box containing the watch to Byatt, and the box was delivered in due course to Byatt, in Middlesex ; and it was held that the constructive possession of Bogers by the railway com- pany in Middlesex was, for criminal as well as civil purposes, equivalent to actual possession by him, and that (as a thief is guilty of larceny in every county into which he asports the goods) Rogers was properly convicted of stealing the watch, at the Middlesex Sessions : (ifcy. v. Bogers, 18 L. T. Bep. N. S. 414.) Where a person supplied meat under a contract to a camp, and the coarse was to send meat to the quartermaster sergeants at the camp, who had their own weights and scales, with which the proper quantity of meat for each mess was weighed by the quartermaster sergeant and a servant of the contractor; and the prisoner, a servant of the contractor, and a quartermaster sergeant on one occasion weighed out the meat, the prisoner putting the weights into the scale, it was discovered- that a false 141b. weight had been substituted for the 141b. weight of the quartermaster sergeant, which was concealed under a bench ; and the false weight had been used in weighing thirty-four messes ; by means of which they were 451b. less in weight than they had appeared to be when first weighed, and the prisoner absconded before any of the surplus meat was removed, as it would have been after all the messes had been supplied ; it was objected that there was no overt act so proximately connected with the felony intended to have been committed, as to warrant a conviction on a count which charged an attempt to steal ; but it was held that there was, Erie, G.J., saying, '; In my opinion there were several overt acts, which brought the attempt close to completion. There were the preparation of the false weight, the placing it in the scale, and the keeping back the surplus meat. It is almost the same as if the prisoner had been sent with two articles, and had delivered one of them as if it had been two. To complete the crime of larceny there only needed one thing, the beginning to move away with the property. The meat was in the prisoner's custody and under his control. He had almost the manual comprehension of it, and had all but begun the asportation :" (Beg. v. Cheesimn, L. & 0. 140.) It is to be observed that all the messes had been weighed before the examination took place; the meat, therefore, which had been Attempts to commit Crimes. cvii weighed had been separated from the rest, and the jury found that the prisoner intended to steal the difference between the just surplus of about 151b. ; for which he would have to account to his master, and the apparent surplus meat of about 601b. actually remaining after the false weighing. And this is the true view of the case ; for, though in every one of the thirty-four messes there was a false weighing, and consequently a delivery of too little meat, yet it ia obvious that the intention was not to steal the false surplus of each weighing, but by means of all the false surpluses to cause the aggregate false surplus at the end of all the weighings, and then, perhaps, to steal that surplus. And as the prisoner caused each false weighing, he was guilty of thirty- four overt acts, every one of which contributed to cause the false surplus at the end of all the weighings. This view strengthens the judgment of the Court; but there is another point, which was overlooked. The prisoner dSJ not intend to steal all the surplus 601b., and until he had actually separated what he did intend to steal from what he intended to devote to his master's use, it was uncertain what particular meat he did intend to steal. At all events, as long as that separation had not been made, both the property and the possession of the whole remained in the master : (Eeg. v. Roberts, 3 Cox 0. 0. 74 ; Bex V. Butteris, 6 C. & P. 147.) It was an error, therefore, to hold that " to complete the crime of larceny there only needed one thing, the beginning to move away with the pro- perty." Suppose the whole 601b. weight had been all in one piepe, it is clear the 451b. must have been separated before the larceny of that part could have been committed ; and the cases above cited show that there must have been a separation of the pieces intended to be stolen, even if the surplus 601b. consisted of several pieces — in other words, the servant must have done some act whereby the master's possession was put an end to and a trespass committed. The decision, however, may perhaps be supported on the ground that what the prisoijer did was the commencement and part of the very means by which the larceny might be effected; and in this case Blackburn, J., said: " There is a difference between the preparation antecedent to an offence and the actual attempt. But if the actual transaction was com- menced, which would have ended in the crime, if not inter- rupted, there is clearly an attempt to commit the crime." The cviii Attempts to commit Crimes. doabt is, whether what the prisoner did was not rather the obtaining the means by which he might be enabled afterwards both to attempt and commit the larceny. If a man broke into a barn with intent to steal, would he be guilty of an attempt to steal the corn in it ? No doubt the prisoner might have been convicted of doing the acts with a felonious intent, or of attempt- ing to defraud by false pretences as to the weight, upon an indictment properly framed to meet either of those views of the case. A number of oases may now be adverted to, in which it has been questioned whether in case there be an impossibility to commit a crime, a person can be guilty of an attempt to commit it, or of doing acts with intent to commit it. The first cases we shall mention are those where the question arose as to such attempts. The prisoner was indicted for breaking into the house of M. F., and stealing therein certain specified articles. These things had been previously stolen from the house, but there were other things in the house, and the jury found that the prisoner attempted to steal the goods then in the house. But it was held that the prisoner could only be convicted, under the 14 & 15 Vict. u. 100, a. 9, of an attempt to commit the " felony charged " in the indictment, and not of an attempt to commit a. felony different from that charged : (-Rej. v. M'Pherson, D. & B. 197.) It was well said by Orowder, J., " When yoa charge an attempt to steal certain articles in a dwelling-house, you must prove that some one of those articles was there." Where an indictment alleged that the prisoners did attempt to commit a certain felony, viz., that they put their hands into the gown pocket of a woman with intent the prcperty of the said woman in the said gown pocket then being to steal, &e., but the woman was not examined, and no proof was given that there was any property in the woman's pocket ; it was held that the prisoners had been wrongly convicted; but upon the special ground that the question "asked seemed to be whether an attempt at larceny can be committed by a person putting his hand into another person's pocket for the purpose of committing a larceny, there being at the time nothing in the pocket." And the Court were " of opinion that, assuming the fact to be that there was nothing in the pocket of the woman, the offence could Attempts to commit Crimes. cix not have been committed " (per Oookburn, C. J.). But the Court thought that the question whether there was anything in the pocket might have been left to the jury, and Bramwell, B., seems to have thought that the prisoner famished evidence against himself by putting his hand into the pocket : (Jleg. v. Collins, L. & 0. 471.) There can be no doubt that this and the preceding decision were right upon the grounds that the indictment in the former alleged the goods to be in the house, which was disproved, and in the latter to be in the pocket, which was not proved. The following cases are those in which a similar question has arisen where the acts were alleged to have been done with intent to commit a crime. Some of these cases, however, would clearly amount to attempts to commit crimes ; but they were not charged in the indictment. In Rex T. Lyons (2 East P. C. u. XV., s. 12, p. 497), the prisoners were indicted for burglary, with intent to steal, &c., and the Judges held that it was not a mansion-house, aa it had never been inhabited ; " they were also of opinion that it was not burglary upon this indictment ; for there were no goods in the house ; and the indictment charging the intent to steal must be to steal the goods then and there being, and where nothing was in the house nothing could be stolen." This report is taken by East from Or. Gas. Res. MS. and MS. Gould and BuUer, JJ. In the report of this case in 1 Leach, 185, it is stated that the prosecutor " had moved some of his effects, to the value of about 10/., into the house." In consequence of this difference in these reports, I have searched the Old Bailey Sessions Papers, a dopy of which is in Lincoln's-inn library, and in those for 1778, p. 83, No. 193, this case is given, and the prosecutor did state that " some effects to the value of 10/.," had been put in the house. The print ends by stating that " the judgment was respited," and there is the following MS. note : " And afterwards arrested upon the ground that a house, newly purchased and under repair, and not inhabited by the owner, who had never taken possession of it so as to live or sleep in it, or to have any other person belonging to him inhabiting or sleeping therein, was not a dwelling-house so aa that burglary could be committed in it." This MS. note gives the ground of the decision so much fuller than either East or Leach that it cannot have been taken from them, and it may ox Attempts to commit Crimes. be a note of the judgment delivered at the Old Bailey. It and the statement of the prosecutor quite support the report in Leach j but they scarcely suffice to negative East's report. The note states what East says was held, which was quite sufficient for the decision of the case. But it may well be that the Judges were also of the opinion stated by Eaot, which may have arisen from the case submitted to them omitting any mention of the effects. A youth under the age of fourteen cannot be guilty of rape on the ground of presumed impoteucy; and in Rex v. Eldershaw (3 0. & P. 396) Vaughan, B., held that such a youth could not be guilty of an assault with intent to commit a rape, saying " from his age the law concludes that it is impossible for him to complete the offence, and that, in my judgment, must be held to negative the intent " to commit a rape. And Patteson, J., in Beg. v. Phillips (8 0. & P. 736), held that such a boy "could not, in point of law, be guilty of the offence of an assault with intent to commit a rape." In both these cases the indictments alleged an assault with intent, and not an attempt, to commit a rape. The 43 Geo. 3, c. 58, s. 1, made it a. capital felony to admi- nister any poison, &c., with intent thereby to cause " the mis- carriage of any woman being then quick with child ;" and sect. 2 made it felony with a lesser punishment to administer any poison, &c., with intent thereby to cause the miscarriage of "any woman not being, or not being proved to be, quick with child at the time." The prisoner was charged in one count with adminis- tering savin to S. 0. " being with child," and in another with a similar administration, but without the words " being with child." It appeared that she never had been pregnant ; and it was held that " the statute did not apply where it appeared negatively that the woman was not with child: " (JRex v. Saidder, E. & M. 0. 0. R. 216.) The 1 Viet. c. 85, ». 6, had only the words " with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman," and all the words as to the woman being quick with child were omitted. But it appeared to me, when I edited Russell in 1843, that this omission had not altered the law as decided by Rex v. Scudder, as the 1 Vict, had done away with the dislinction as to the punishment where the woman was quick with child and where she was not, which was quite sufficient to acooiint for the omission in question. However, in Reg. v. Goodall (or Good- Attempts to commit Crimes. cxi child) (1 Den. 0. 0. 187; 2 0. & K. 293) the Judge8;held that on an indictment upon the 1 Viot. c. 85 for using an instrument with intent to procure the miscarriage of a woman, the fact of the woman not being pregnant was immaterial. This case, therefore, is a direct authority that a man may be convicted of an intent to do that which it was impossible to do. This case was not argued, and no previous authority was refen-ed to in it, except Rex v. Scudder. In the subsequent case of Meg. v. Tylney (1 Den. 0. 0. 319), one count charged a forgery with intent to defraud the heir-at- law of W. T., and another charged the forgery with intent to defraud certain persona whose names were unknown. Colt- man, J., thought that, as there was no proof of there having been any heir-at-law of W. T., except one of the prisoners, the first count was not proved ; but as the forgery was clearly proved, and it appeared highly improbable that such a forgery should be committed without an intent to defraud some one, the case was left to the jury on the other count, and they convicted; and the Judges were evenly divided on the question whether, in the absence of evidence of the existence of some person whom the prisoner could have defrauded by a forged will, a count for forgery with intent to defraud some person unknown could be supported. In Reg. v. Nash (^2 Den. 0. 0. 493) the question was again discussed ; but the case seems to have been decided on another gi-ound. Maule, J., however, said: " The Recorder seems to have thought that, in order to prove an intent to defraud, there should have been some person defrauded, or who might possibly have been defrauded. But I do not think that at all necessary. A man may have an intent to defraud, and yet there may not be any person who could be defrauded by his act. Suppose a person with a good account at his bankers', and a friend, with his knowledge, forges his name to a cheque either to try his credit, or to imitate his handwriting, there would be no intent to defraud, though there would be parties who might be defrauded ; but where another person has no account at his bankers', but a man supposes that he has, and on that supposition forges his name, there would be an intent to defraud in that case, although no person could be defrauded :" (p. 499.) Alderson, B., seeme to have agreed with Maule, J. (p. 501), and Lord Camp- bell, C.J., Oresswell and Erie, JJ., did not express any dissent, cxii Attempts to commit Crimes. although Cresswell, J., had previously, in Reg. v. Marcus (2 C. & K. 358), held that " there must at all events be a possibility of some poison being defrauded by the forgery." With all deference I must be pardoned for doubting the latter part of the dictum of Manle, J. Where a cheque on a banker is forged, any one to whom the cheque is passed may be defrauded by it, although the banker has no funds, and this is the common case. It is difficult, too, to suppose any forgery, of which, at the time of the forgery, it can be correctly affirmed that no one 'can be defrauded by it. Every forged negotiable instrument may be passed to ignorant persons, and.9ven non-negotiable instruments, e. g., deeds or wills, may be used to raise money upon them from ignorant persons. In Seg. v. M'Pherson (D. & B. 197) the prisoner was indicted -for breaking into a house and stealing certain specified goods, which had, in fact, been taken out of the house previously, and it was held that he could not be convicted of the attempt to : commit the " felony charged." But Cockburn, 0. J., twice drew the distinction between attempting to commit an offence, and intending to commit it. And Coleridge, J.j said, " When the prisoner broke into the house, he might have intended to steal the goods mentioned in the indictment; but you must not confound attempt with intent." And in Reg. v. Collins (L. & C. 471), where it was held that the prisoner could not be convicted, on an indictment charging an attempt to steal the property " then being " in a gown pocket, there being at the time nothing in the pocket, a like distinction seems to have been drawn. Such are the authorities, as far as we are aware, which bear upon this question, and it would seem that the preponderance of them is in favour of the position that a man may be convicted of doing an act with intent to commit a crime, although it be impos- sible to commit such crime ; but that a man cannot be convicted of an attempt to commit a crime unless the attempt might have succeeded. It seems, however, to deserve further consideration whether the distinction apparently taken between an attempt and an intent to commit a crime in cases where the crime intended could not in fact be committed, can be supported. What is an attempt? Is it not an act or acts done with intent to commit a crime ? The forms of indictment for attempts to commit crimes Attempts to commit Crimes. cxiii in many cases do not allege an attempt at all, but allege the acts to have been done with intent to commit the crime, and many statutes make acta done with intent to commit crimes punishable, which are clearly attempts to commit those crimes. No doubt a distinction may be drawn between acts done with intent to commit crimes, and attempts to commit crimes, viz., every attempt to commit a crime includes an act done with intent to con^piit that crime ; but an act may be done with such an intent which is not an attempt ; in fact, attempts to commit crimes are only a part of acts done with intent to commit crimes. If, then, an intent to commit a crime may exist, though it is impossible to commit the crime, why may not an attempt to commit a crime also exist in like manner ? We speak commonly of attempts to do things, which are either absolutely impossible, or impossible to those who make the attempt : Hie BitUB est Phaeton, cnrr&a anriga patemi, Qaem si non tenult, magnis tamen excidit ausis. Meg. V. M'Pherson and Heg. v. Collins do not decide the point ; for in both those cases >• material averment in the indictment was not proved, and It is but reasonable that any expressions of the learned Judges, which may be wider than were necessary for the decision in either of those cases, should be limited to the points really decided, viz., that the particular attempts were erroneously described. But suppose that the indictment had omitted the averment which was not proved, and the allegation of an attempt, and bad simply averred that the prisoners did the acts with intent to steal the goods and chattels, neither describing them nor alleging where they were, such indictments would clearly have been good, and would not such indictments have alleged attempts to steal? and would not the evidence have proved them? If so, does not this prove that the supposed distinction between attempts and acts done with a criminal intent cannot be sup- ported? Perhaps the strongest way to put the point is this: Suppose an indictment contained two counts, one charging an attempt to commit a crime and another charging acts done with intent, to commit the same crime in such terms as clearly to amount to an attempt to commit the crime ; and that it appeared that the prisoner did the acts with intent to commit the crime, but that it was impossible to commit it ; then, according to the cxiv Attempts to commit Crimes. authorities, he mast be acquitted on the first count charging the attempt, and yet, according to the prevailing opinion, he might be convicted upon the second count, though, in point of law, it was precisely the same as the first count. In jReg. v. CoUins, Cockburu, 0. J., said, " the prisoner had a double purpose, first, to ascertain whether there was anything in the pocket ; secondly, to take it if there was ; " and no doubt this is a perfectly correct view where a thief puts his hand in a pocket ; but still he would be liable to be convicted of putting his hand into the pocket with intent to steal. It is just like the case where, on an indictment for shooting at a person with intent to do grievous bodily harm, the jury found that the prisoner's motive was to prevent his lawful apprehension, but that, in order to effect that purpose, he also intended to do grievous bodily harm ; and the judges held that, if both intents existed, it was immaterial which was the principal and which the subor- dinate one : (Rex v. Gillow, R. & M. 0. 0. R. 85.) I will now point out the proper mode of framing indictments in the cases to which this paper relates. Where the attempt to commit a felony is itself a felony, the indictment can, of course, only charge the attempt. If, therefore, there be any fair doubt whether the facts amount to an attempt, the proper course is to prefer a second indictment for a misdemeanor in doing the acts with a criminal intent. Heg. v. Williams (1 Den. 0. 0. 39 and Dears. 0. C. 547) is a good precedent for that course. There the prisoner was acquitted on an indictment for attempting to administer poison by sending a guilty agent to administer it ; but afterwards convicted on an indictment for the misdemeanor of doing those things unlawfully with the criminal intent. But where the attempt to commit an offence is a misdemeanor, and there is any doubt as to the facts proving the attempt, the proper course is to add one or more counts alleging the acts to have been done with the criminal intent, and not to charge an attempt in those counts. By this course, if the proof of the attempt fail, the prisoner may still be convicted on the other counts. As to the frame of the latter counts, they should always allege the acts to have been done " unlawfully," and should add such other adverbs as are appropriate to the particular ease, whether they be •' wilfully," " maliciously," " corruptly," Attempts to commit Crimes. exv "fraudulently," or other. The criminal intent should also be carefully stated in its proper legal terms. In many cases the intent to commit the intended offence may well be laid and proved. But there are oases in which doubts as to this may arise. Suppose, for instance, that although the prisoner may intend to commit the offence, and have done some act with that intent, yet it is impossible he could commit the offence, the question arises how is an indictment to be framed in such a case. It is obvious that care must be taken not to state any fact which cannot be proved. For instance, if the charge be one of putting the hand into a pocket, the intent must not be laid to steal the moneys " then being in the pocket," as that allegation would make it necessary to prove that there were moneys in the pocket : (Jteg. v. Collins.) Several cases on the 5 Geo. 4, c. 83, s. 4, hear upon this point. That section applies to persons frequenting certain places " with intent to commit felony." In In re Cross (1 H. & N. 651 ; 1 0. B., N. S., 573) a commitment under this section ran " with intent feloniously to steal the moneys, goods, and chattels of S. S. from her person." In the other cases the statement was " with intent to commit felony :" (Jn re Jones, 7 Ex. R. 586 ; SeweU v. Tayhr, 7 0. B., N. S., 160 ; In re Davis, 2 H. & N. 149 ; Reg. v. Brown, 17 Q. B. 833.) In none of these cases was any objection taken to the manner in which the intent was stated, except that the word " there " ought to have been added after " felony;" but both the Courts of Qaeen's'Benoh and Exchequer held that it was unnecessary, as the offence was committed if the intent were to commit felony anywhere : {Reg. v. Brown; In re Jones.) ■ It would seem, how- ever, that in some cases at least it would be right to add the word " there," or some equivalent, especially where it is clear that it was intended to commit the offence where the act was done. But there are cases where it ought not to be done ; as where the act is the soliciting to murder or rob. Reg. v. Johnson (L. & G. 48) shows that the statement in In re Cross as to the goods was sufficient. There the prisoner was charged with attempting to steal " the goods and chattels of T. R. in the dwelling-house," ifcc, and it was held to be sufficient, for " where there is only an attempt, it is not always possible to say what property the would-be thief meant to steal;" and a fortiori that must be the case where there is only an intent ; as in the case of cxvi Attempts to commit Crimes. burglary, where it is unnecessary to describe the goods intended to be stolen or to state their ownership : (2 Buss. 0. & M. H.) The only correct rule is, that the intent, like other things, should be stated with as much particularity as the nature o{ the case will permit, and where there are several intents it is advisable to have counts framed so as to meet each of them. The intent may be laid either in the prefatory part of the indictment, or in the conclusion, or in both. In Bex v. Philips (6 East R. 464) the indictment began by charging that the defendant, intending to do great bodily harm to R. G. T., and to break the peace, &o., sent a letter to R. G. T., in which he was said to have behaved like a blackguard, with intent to incite R. 6. T. to challenge the defendant ; and it was held that the intent was sufficiently alleged in the prefatory averment, and that the indictment might be supported either by the intent, or by the intent laid at the conclusion of it. Indictments, whitfh charged attempts to commit crimes, have been in two forms. In one the indictment has simply charged the attempt without alleging the means by which it was made. In the other the means have been stated, and then it has been alleged that the prisoner thereby attempted to commit the crime. It is clear that in the former case, if the evidence failed to prove an attempt, the prisoner must be acquitted. But in the latter case, if it be proved that the means were used with intent to commit the crime, but not so as to prove an attempt, the question arises whether the prisoner may not be convicted. The general rule is that " it is invariably enough to prove so much of the indictment as shows that the defendant has committed a. substantive crime therein specified : " (Per Lord Ellenborough, Bex v. Hunt, 2 Campb. 585. See the cases 3 Russ. 0. & M. 309, et scj.) If, therefore, it were proved that the prisoner did any of the acts alleged with a criminal intent, it would seem that he might be convicted thereof, provided the indictment properly stated the intent (Reg. v. Reicl, 2 Den. 0. 0. 88), although the proof of the attempt failed. An attempt to commit a crime must include one or more acts done with intent to commit the crime, and on the general principle, a conviction may take place for the latter, if the proof fail to substantiate the former. In Reg. v. Eagktan the 8th, 9th, and 10th counts alleged that the prisoner made certain false pretences, but did not Attempts to commit Crimes. cxvii allege any intent with which they were made, and then stated that the prisoner thereby attempted to obtain the money with intent to defraud. If the counts had alleged that the pretences were made with intent to defraud, all the difBoulties in the case would have been avoided, and the prisoner might have been convicted of that part of the indictment. But as no intent was so laid, he could not be convicted if the making the pretences did not amount to an attempt : (Reg. v, Reid.) I have now concluded this examination of indictable criminal acts and attempts to commit crimes, and I hope I have been able to throw considerable light upon these subjects, which have never been so fully considered before. At all events I feel sure that I have collected a mass of information which may prove serviceable on future occasions to those who may have to deal with any of these cases. Since my paper on attempts to commit offences was written, my attention has been called to the following oases : B., intended to murder C, wounds D. ; could he be indicted tor attempting to murder D. ? Had he killed D., he would have been guilty of murder undoubtedly, but could he be guilty of attempting to do that which he did not design to do ? This statement is imperfect, as it does not mention whether C. was present at the time when D. was wounded. It is therefore necessary to deal with the question on the supposition that 0. was present, and also on the supposition that he was absent. 1. If C. was present, the case would be that B., intended to murder C, struck at C, but missed him, and hit and wounded D. • or, to put a similar case, B. shoots at C, with intent to murder him, but misses him, and hits and wounds D. It is quits clear that in both these cases B. was guilty of an attempt to murder 0. He had the intent to murder, and he did an act which, if it had taken effect, as he intended it should, would have carried his intent into effect. Then was B. guilty of an attempt to murder D. ? An attempt includes an intent to do the act intended ; and as in fact B. had no Intent to murder D., it may, at first sight, reasonably be supposed that B. could not be guilty of an attempt to murder D. But when we come to examine the authorities we shall find that they lead to a different conclusion. In Saunders' case (Plow. 473), A. gave his wife a poisoned apple, intending to cxviii Attempts to commit Grimes. murder her, and she innocently gave it to her child, who ate it and died ; and this was held murder in A., on the ground that he had administered poison with intent to kill one person, and since death had ensued from his act, though to another person, yet it is murder in him, for he was the original causer of this death; and when he administered poison to the intent to kill any reasonable creature, and another reasonable creature, whom he did not intend, is killed by it, such killing shall not be dispunishable, but he who administered it shall be punished for it, because he had an evil intent. And for this reason it is for him to foresee what mischief will happen from his act prepared and ministered to an evil intent, and he shall not be excused by saying that he intended to kill another, and not this person. For if one, of malice prepense, shoot an arrow at one, intending to kill him, and hi^ arrow kills another, against whom he bore no malice, this shall be murder in him ; for he intended murder in his act, and because he directed his instrument of death, and had killed another with it, it shall be an equal offence in him as if he had killed the person intended. For the end of the act shall be adjudged by the beginning of the act, and the last part shall savour of the first, and the first pari was upon malice prepense, and so implied murder, and the end of the act, viz., the IcilUng another, shaUbe of the same degree, viz.,- murder, and not homicide only. Upon the authority of this case. Gore's case (9 Rep. 81), was decided. There an apothecary made an electuary, by the direc- tions of an M.D., for Gore, into which Gore's wife, Agnes, put poison, and gave some of it to Gore, who became grievously sick, and two others who ate part became sick also. The M.D., being told of these things, questioned the apothecary as to making the electuary according to his directions, and his answers satisfied the M.D. ; but the apothecary, in order to remove all doubt, stirred the electuary together and ate part of it, of which he died. The doubt was, as the apothecary of his own head, and without the procurement of any, not only ate of the electuary, but stirred it together, which so incorporated the poison with it that it made the working more forcible than the mixture which Agnes had made, whether this distinguished the case from Saunders' case ; and all the Judges held that Agnes was guilty of the murder of the apothecary, for " the law doth join the murderous intent of Agnes inputting the poison into the electuary to Attempts to commit Crimes. oxix kiU her husband with the event which Jbllows on it — i.e., the death of the apothecary; and the putting of the poison into the electuary 19 the occasion and cause, and the poisoning and death of the apothecary is the event ; quia eventus est qui ex causa sequitur, ei dicuntur eventus quia ex causis eveniunt. And the stirring of the electuary by the apothecary, -without the putting in of the poison by Agnes, could not have been the cause of the death." And the grounds of Saunders' case were altogether adopted by the court. Now, both these were cases of poisoning, in whioh the very essence of the offence is the intent with which the poison is laid or administered ; and the ground of both decisions is that the murderous intent, with which poison is laid for or given to one person, shall be joined to the taking of the poison by another, for whom it was not intended ; so that, in point of law, the case is exactly the same as if the intent had actually been to murder the person who took the poison. It follows from these authorities that where B. strikes at G. with a murderous intent, bat misses him and kills D., the law couples the murderous intent against 0. with the blow which kills D., and makes B. guilty of the murder of D. In other words, the law causes the blow which kills to be accompanied by the murderous intent. If that be so, and the authorities seem clearly to show that it is, the blow itself is of the same nature and character as if it had fallen on the person for whom it was in fact intended ; in other words, it was a blow given with intent to murder. Upon these authorities it seems clear that, in the supposed case, B. might be guilty of an attempt to murder D., though he struck at 0., and had in fact no murderous intent against D. And this conclusion seems to be strongly confirmed by this consideration. Every crime, of necessity, must consist of an attempt to commit it, and of the execution of that attempt ; and where, if death had ensued from an act done with a murderous intent, the crime would have been murder, it is exceedingly difficult to conceive that the act so done is not an attempt to murder. No difficulty arises from two attempts to murder ; viz., to murder 0. as well as D., resulting from this reasoning. In Gore's case there was the attempt to murder Gore as well as the murder of the apothecary. 2. The other supposition is that 0. was absent when D. was cxx Attempts to commit Crim^. wounded, and then the case would be that B., intending to murder C, wounded D., having mistaken him for C. On this supposition there is no doubt that B. would be guilty of an attempt to murder D. It is true that Bex v. Holt (7 0. & P. 518) is the other way; but after that decision in the edition of Eussell in 1843, 1 remarked that " in the case of shooting at one person on the supposition that he is another, although there be -^ mistake, the prisoner must intend to murder that person at whom he shoots ; it is true he may be mistaken in fact as to the person, and it may be owing to such mistake that he shoots at such person, but still he shoots with intent to kill that person. So in the case of cutting : a man may cut one person under a, mistake that he is another person, but still he must intend to murder the person whose throat he cuts." And I cited Reg. V. Mister (Salop Spring Assizes 1841). There, Mister had followed one Ludlow for several days to an inn in Ludlow, and he got under a bed in which he supposed Ludlow would sleep ; but into which one Mackreth got, and in the night Mister cut Maokreth's throat very severely, and there was no doubt he mistook him for Ludlow ; and he was convicted before Gurney, B., on a count, which charged him with cutting Mackreth with intent to murder him, and afterwards executed. The following cases fully support the positions 1 so laid down. The prisoner having quarrelled with a man in a public-house, waited outside to attack him, but the prosecutor, with whom the prisoner had no dispute, went out first, and, being mistaken by the prisoner for the other man, was wounded by him. It was contended that the intent to injure the prosecutor was not proved, and Sex v. Holt was cited. Alderson, B. : "If Sex V. Holt lays down the position you contend for, I shall certainly overrule it. I do not think it either law or good sense. I shall direct the jury that if they think the prisoner did to the prosecutor what he intended to do to another man, they must find him guilty :'' (iJc^. v. Lynch, 1 Cox Orim. Oas. 361.) So where upon an indictment for wounding Taylor with intent to murder him, it appeared that the prisoner intended to murder one Maloney ; but supposing Taylor to be Maloney, shot at and wounded Taylor, and the jury found that the prisoner intended to murder Maloney, not knowing that the party he shot at was Taylor, but supposing him to be Maloney, and that he intended Attempts to commit Crimes. oxxi to murder the person he shot at, Bupposing hira to be Maloney, and oonTioted the prisoner. The judges held, on a case reserved, that the conviction was right ; for, though he did not intend to kill the particular person, he meant to murder the man at whom he shot : {Reg. v. Smith, Dears, 0. G. 559.) This case clearly overrules Rex v. Holt, which was cited in it. The result, therefore, clearly is, that if B. wounded D., supposing him to be C, whom he inteuced to murder, B. would be guilty of an attempt to murder D., on the ground that he intended to murder D., though he mistook him for 0. In speaking of an attempt to murder, I have throughout dealt with it as a common law offence, and not as an offence within any statute. I now advert to another case. B. persuaded a child under ten years of age to allow him to take indecent liberties with her, and he was indicted for an indecent assault; but that was answered by the fact of consent. It was then contended that he could be convicted of the attempt to commit an indecent assault ; but Serjeant Cox held that if the full offence could not be sus- tained in law, he could not be convicted of an attempt to commit it. If the child was a, consenting party, so that there was no assault, she must have consented also to the attempt. It also seemed to the learned Serjeant very difSoult to understand how there could be an attempt to assault in any case ; for whatever would amount to an attempt to assault would be. an assault in law. 1. It is quite clear that the consent of the girl answered the charge of the indecent assault (^Reg. v. Martin, 2 M. 0. 0. R. 123) for there can be in law no assault unless the act be done against consent. 2. It is equally clear that the consent of the girl would be an answer to an attempt to commit an assault, for the same reason also. 3. An assault is an attempt or offer, with force and violence, to do a corporal hurt to another, coupled with a present ability of using the force and violence upon the person of such other person. It is, therefore, confined to such acts as are accompanied by such a present ability. It is not easy to define precisely what a present ability is ; but the following oases illustrate the matter. Where the plaintiff came to the defendant's premises, and refused 9 cxxii Attempts to commit Crimes. to leave them when ordered by him, and he collected together some of his workmen, who mustered round the plaintiff, tucking up their sleeves and aprons, and threatened to break his neck if he did not go out, and, fearing they would strike him if he did not do BO, the plaintiff went out, the Court of Common Pleas held that this was an assault ; for there was a threat of violence exhibiting a present intention to assault, and a present ability to carry the threat into execution: (2?earf v. Coker, 13 C. B. 850.) And where the plaintiff was walking along a footpath by the side of a road, and the defendant rode after him at a quick pace, and the plaintiff ran away and got into his own garden, when the defendant rode up to the garden-gate (the plaintiff being then about three yards from him), and shaking his whip, said, " Come out, and I will lick you before your own servants," Lord Tenterden, O.J., held, that if the defendant rode after the plaintiff, so as to compel him to run into his garden for shelter, to avoid being beaten, that is in law an assault : (Martin v. Shoppee, 3 0. & P. 374.) So where the defendants were walking with loaded guns at half cock in their hands on the plaintiffs' field, and being desired to withdraw they half raised their guns, which they pointed towards the plaintiffs, and threatened to shoot them, WiUes, J., held,, that pointing a loaded gun is in law an assault. It is immaterial that it is at half cock ; cocking is an instantaneous act, and there is a, present ability of doing the act threatened, fQr it can be done in an instant: (^Osborne v. Veitch, 1 F. & F. 31T.) We now advert to a case, which requires some consideration, as it is obviously inaccurately reported, as one part of it Is quite inconsistent with the other part. Accordiiig to the statement in the report, " the declaration stated that the defendant threatened and attempted to assault the plaintiff." The evidence was that at a parish meeting the defendant interrupted the proceedings, and the majority voted that he should be turned out of the roorh ; whereon he said he would rather pull the chairman out of the chair, and advanced with his clenched fist towards th.e chairman, but was stopped by the churchwarden, who sat next but one to the chairman, at a time when he was not near enough for any blow he might have meditated to have reached the chairman, but when he seemed to be advancing with an intention to strike the chairman ; Tindall, O.J., told the jury "it is not every threat, Attempts to commit Crimes. cxxiii ■when there is no actual peraoual violence, that constitutes an assault ; there must, in all cases, be the means of carrying the threat into effect. The question I shall leave to you will be, whether the defendant was advancing at the time, in a threaten- ing attitude, to strike the chairman, so that his blow would almost immediately have reached the chairman if he had not been stopped ; then, though he was not near enough at the time to have struck him, yet, if he was advancing with that intent, I think it amounts to an assault in law. If he was so advancing that within a second or two of time he would have reached him, it seems to me that it is an assault in law :" (^Stephens v. Myers, 4 C. & P. 349.) Now, the declaration, as stated, charged an attempt to assault, whereas the direction to the jury applies to an assault only. Clearly, therefore, one statement or the other must be erroneous. It is dii&cult to conceive how the state- m'ent as to the declaration can have got into the report, if it were in the ordinary form, and simply alleged that the defendant assaulted the plaintiff ; and the facts would certainly be very likely to lead the pleader to frawe a declaration in the form in which this is stated to have been; whilst, on the other hand, it is very easy to conceive that the state- ment of that great Judge, Tiadal, O.J., may have been in- accurately reported, especially when so slight an alteration as substituting " attempt to assault " for " assault " in the latter part of his charge would make it consistent with the declaration as stated, and the facts also. If this view of this case be correct, it is a distinct authority that there may be an attempt to commit an assault. In principle there seems no satisfactory ground for doubting that there may be such an attempt. Although an assault may be an attempt to inflict a battery on another, as where A. strikes at B., but misses him, yet it may not amount to such an attempt, as where A. holds up his hand in a threatening attitude at B. within reach of him, or points a gun at him without more. Is not the true view this — that every offence must have its beginning and completion ? and is not whatever is done which falls short of the completion an attempt, provided it be suffi- ciently proximate to the intended offence ? Pointing a loaded gun is an assault. Is not raising the gun in order to point it an attempt to assault ? cxxiv Climes and their Punishments. So, too, there may be unlawful acts done in oases of assault which do not amount to an attempt. A. threatens to horsewhip B., and fetches a whip out of his house to do it, and in the meantime B. has gone away. Here there is an act done, and a criminal intent coupled with it. And here let it be noted that Tindal, C.J., plainly thought that advancing towards a man with intent to assault him was a criminal act, and so did Lord Tentbrden think that riding after a man was so also ; and these high opinions mightily strengthen the doubt I expressed in my former paper as to the dictum that going to a place to commit a murder was not a criminal act. It is presumed that the indictment in this case did not contain a similar statement to that in Reg. v. Ryland (18 L. T. Rep. 538), so as to warrant u conviction of an attempt to commit the statutory offence, although the evidence failed to prove the assault. I subjoin a Table of Crimes and tkeir Punishments, whicli may be useful for ready reference in court, and for which I am indebted to my friend Mr. Purcell, Barrister-at-Law. A TABLE OF CRIMES AND THEIE PUNISHMENTS. Coutractioiisr—F, Felony J M, Misdemeanor ; P. S., Penal Servitude; imp., imprisonment; h. 1., haxd labour; s. o., solitary confinement; w., whipping. N.B. In aJl cases the maximnm term of penal servitude or imprisonment is given. Abduction : of a woman of any age or under age on account of her pro- perty with intent to marry or defile. fraudulenti allurement or de- tention of any woman under twenty-one from parents or giiardians with Intent, &c. forcible, of any woman of any age, with intent, &c. of a girl under sixteen out of possession of parents or guar- dians. AbeTTOKS : in misdemeanors Abortion : administering drugs, or using instruments by woman her- self or others. supplying drugs to same ACCESSOEIES AND PEIISrCIPALS IK THE Second Degree : accessories before the fact to any felony. after the fact to any felony under the Larceny Act (ex- cept receiving) . after the fact under the MaU- ciousInjuriestoPropertyAct. after the fact to any felony under the Offences against the Person Act (except murder) , after the fact to any other felony. principals in second degree in cases of felony punishable imder The Larceny Act. The Forgery Act Coinage Offences Act Offences against the Person Act. F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp, 2 yrs h. 1. F, Ibid F, Ibid M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. M, same as princi- F, P. S, life, or imp. 2yrsh. 1, s. c. M, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. F, same as princi- pal. F, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. F, Ibid F, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, ... F, imp. 2yrs h. 1, and sureties for keeping the peace for not more than one year. F, same as princi- pals in first degree. F, Ibid F, Ibid P, Ibid 24 & 25 Yict. u. 100, B. 53. Ibid. Ibid. s. 54. Ibid. 6. 55. 24&25Vict.c.94, s. 8, and see lb. C.96, s. 98 ; C.97, s.56;c.98,s.49; c. 99, 5. 35 ; and c.lOO,s.67. Ibid. a. 58. Ibid. ». 59. 24&25Vict.c.94, ss. 1, 2. 24&25Vict.c.96, s.98. 24&25Tict.c.97, 8.56. 24 & 25 Vict. u. 100, s. 67. 24&25Vict.c.94, s. 4. 24&25Vict.c.96, — c.97, 0.56. — c.99,s.35. — c.l00,s.67. Crimes and their Punishments. Accusing op Ceime : (or threatening to accuse) with, intent to extort. with intent to defraud^ by un- lawful vaolence or restrainti or hy threats of accusing, of treason, felony or infamous crime, compelling to execute deed, &c. SeeaJso "Letter Threatening." Admiealtt : offences within jurisdiction of, see " Ship," port. * Agent, see "Fraudulent Trus- tee," ;gost. Aems : training to the use of, &c. Abson: places of divine worship dwelling house, any person being thereiu. house, outhouse, warehouse, farmbuilding, &c., whether the same be in the possession of the offender or any other peraon. bmldings appertainii^ to rail- way, port, dock, harbour, canal, or other navigation. any other bmlding belonging to the Queen, or to any county, riding, di vision, city,^borough, poor-law union, parish, or place, or belonging to any university, college, or hall of any university, or to any inn of court, or devoted to public use or ornament, or erected or maintained by public sub- scription. any other building than those in the Act (24 & 25 Vict. c. 97) specified. anything being in or against or under any building, under such circumstances that if the same were thereby set fire to, the offender womdbe guilty of felony. attempting to set fire to any building or any matter or thing (as last offence) under such circumstances that if the same were thereby set fire to, the offender would be guilty of felony. F, P. a life, or imp. % yrs h. 1, and male under 16 w. P, Ibid, (w, ex- cepted) with s. c. M, P. S. 7 yrs, or fine or imp. 2 yre, or both. F, P. S. life, or imp. 2yrsh. 1, s.c,male under 16 w, F, Ibid F.Ibid F, Ibid. F, Ibid. F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, and male under 16 w. F, Ibid F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2yrsh.l, s. c, male under 16 w. 24&25Vict.c.96, s. 47. Ibid. s. 48. 30 Geo. 3 & 1 Geo. 4, c. 1, s. 1. 24&25Tict.c.97, s. 1. Ibid. s. 2. Ibid. s. 3. Ibid. s. 4. Ibid. B. 5, Ibid. 8. 6. Ibid. 8. 7. Ibid. 8. 8. Crimes and their Punishments. Arson (oontmued) : crops of hay,' grass, com, &:c., standing or cut down, or wood, coppice, plantation, heath, gorse, furze, fern. stacks of corn, grain, pulse, hay, or any cultivated vege- table produce or furze, &c., peat, coals, wood, hark, &;g. attempting to set fire as in the two lost offences, under such circumstances that if the same were thereby set fire to, the offender would be under either of these sections (16 and 17) guilty of felony. mines, setting fire to attempting ditto... ships, setting fire to attempting ditto settittg fire to Her Majesly's vessels of war, &c. setting fire to the works or vessels lying in dock. See " Malicious In]*uries, "Accessories and FrincipaJs in the Second Degree." ASSATILT : common assault ■ anyassaultcausiagbodilyharm impeding any person saving mmsftlf or others from a wreck. with intent to do grievous bodily hflxm, or to resist or prevent lawful apprehension or detainer. unlawfully wounding attempting to choke, strangle, &c,, with intent to commit indictable offence. doing grievous bodily harm by gunpowder or other explo- sive substance. causing explosive substance to explode, or sending such to any person, or laying such at any place, or throwing such, or any corrosive liquid with intent to maim or do grievous bodily harm, whether injury effected or not. P, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. s.c. m£ue under 16 w. P, P. S.life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, and male imder 16 w. P, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, and male under 16 P, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, and male under 16 w. F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, male under 16 w. F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs, h. 1, s. c, male under 16 w. P, Ibid P, death (sentence recorded4Geo. 4, c. 48, B. 1 ; 2 & 3 Vict, c. 56. 8. 17.) F, IMd M, imp. lyr h. 1. ... M, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2yrsh. 1. ... F, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. F, Ibid. 24&25Vict.c.97, s. 16. Ibid. B. 17. Ibid. 8. 18. Ibid. s. 26. Ibid. B. 27. Ibid. ss. 42, 43. Ibid. 8. 44. 12 Geo. 3, c. 24, B. 1. Ibid. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100, s. 47. Ibid. Ibid. s. 17. Ibid. 8. 18. M, Ibid. s. c. ex- cepted. P, P. S, life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. and w. F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, and male under 16 w. F, Ibid Ibid. s. 20. Ibid. s. 21. Ibid. Ibid. 8. csxviii Crimes and their Punishments. ASSAT7LT {conimAied) : throwing gunpowder or other eaplosive snhstaace upon or near hiiildinga,ships,&c.,with intent to do bodily injury, whether injury effected or not. with intent to commit felony.,. on males, with, intentj &c. on persons discharging duty with regard to the preserva- tion of wrecks. arising from a combination to raise wages. on ministers of religion en- gaged at their duties, or gomg or returning. with intent to rob, being armed with offensive weapons, or together with one or more persons, or the using per- sonal violence at the time of robbery or just before or after. with menaces or force demand- ing with intent to steal. on peace officers and parish and union officers in dis- charge of duty. upon aJiy person with intent to resist or prevent lawful apprehension of self or other person. indecent upon any female with intent to rob on keeper of deer while in execution of his powers, seizing gun, &g. on special or county constable by any person liable to be apprehended under the pro- visions of 14 & IS Vict, c. 19, on person authorised to ap- prehend. Attempts to Hubdeb: by poison F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, and male under 16 w. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, also fine and sure- ties. M, P. S. 10 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, M, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, and court may fine in lieu or addition, and compel to find sureties. SI, imp., &c., as above. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. F, P. S. life, or imp, 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. (and if a male once, twice, or thrice w. 26 & 27 Vict, c. 44.) F, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, aJso fine and surety. M, Ibid. M, imp. 2 yrsh.l.... F, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2 yrsh.l, s. c. F, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, male under 16 w. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, also fine and sure- ties. M, imp. h. 1.3 yrs... P. S. life, or imp. 24 & 25 Vict. u. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. 100, s. 11. 24 & 25 Vict. 100, s. 30. Ibid. SB. 38, 71. Ibid. ». 62. Ibid. d. 37. Ibid. s. 41. Ibid. 8. 36. 24 & 25 Vict. c. ;, BS. 43, 49. FDid. s. 45. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100, ss. 38, 71, and 13&14 Vict, c. 101, 8. 9; and for definitions see4&5Will.4, c. 76, and 14 & 15 Vict. c. 105, 8.18. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100, SB. 38, 71. Ibid. 8. 52. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 96, s. 42. Ibid. B. 16. 1 & 2 Will. 4, c. 41, 8. 11, and 2&3Vict.c.93, s. 8. 14 & 15 Vict. u. 19, s. 13. Crimes and their Punishments* csxix Attempts to Murder (contwiwed) : \>y explosions ... .*. by setting fire to ships by sbooting-, (fee by otlier means Attemfes to Commit other Crimes : by administering chloroform or attempting to administer, with a view to commit or aid in the commission of an in- dictable offence. to commit a felony whether statutable or at common law. to commit a misdemeanor. Bailee, see "Larceny," 'post. Bankers, see '* Fraudulent Trus- tees," post. BaneinG' Shares : the inserting in any contract or agreement for the sale or transfer of shares in any banking company any false entry of the numbers, or any name other than that of the person in whose name the shores stand. Bankruptcy : persons made bankrupt in pur- suance of the act of 1869, where bankrupt does not truly discover all his pro- perty to trustee. does not deliver up to trustee all such part of his real and personal property as is under his control. does not deliver up aU books, papers, &c., relating to his property after the presenta- tion of petition or com- mencement of liquidation, or within four months before, or concealing any part of his property, value £10 or up- wards, or any debt due to or from him. if after, &c, (as above) , bankrupt fraudulently removes any portion of his property, value 101. or upwards. makes any material omission in any statement relating to his affairs. fails to inform trustee within a month where he knows or believes a false debt has been proved by any person under the bankruptcy or liquida- tion. P, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. s. c. F, Ibid F. Ibid F, Ibid F, P. S. life, 5 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, M, fine, imp, or both (and h. 1. 3 Geo. 4. c. 114). M, fine or imp, or both. M, fine or imp, or both. K, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. M, Ibid. M, Ibid. 24 & 25 Vict. 100. s. 12. Ibid. s. 13. Ibid. B. 14. Ibid. s. 15. !4 & 25 Yict. c. 100, s. 22. Common law. Common law. 30 Vict. c. s.l. 32 & 33 Vict. u. 62, 8. 11. Ibid. Ibid. M. Ibid. M, Ibid. M, Ibid. Ibid. Ibid. Ibid. cxxx Crimes and thdr Punishments. BAUKRTJPTcy {coniinued) : if after the presentation of tlie bankruptcy petition or com- mencement of liquidation bankrupt prevents the prat* duction of any book or docu- ment. if after, &c., or within four months next before, &c., he conceals, mutilates, &c., or is privy to concealment of any book or document relating to his affairs. if, &c. (as before), he makes or is privy to the making any false entry in aay book or document. if, &c. (as before), he fraudu- lently parts with, or alters^ or makes any omission in, or is privy to the parting with, altering, &c., any document, if , after presentation of petition, or commencement of liqui- dation,'or at any meeting of his creditors within four months next before such he attempts to account for any part of his property by ficti- tious losses or expenses. if within four months next before the presentation, &c., or commencement, &c., he by any false representation, or other fraud, has obtained any property on credit and has not paid for same. if, as above, he, being a trader, obtains xmder the false pre- tence of carrying on business and dealing in the ordinary way of his trade any property on credit, and has not pEiid. for same, if, as above, he, being a trader, pawns, pledges, or disposes of, otherwise than in the ordinary way of his trade, any property which he has obtamed on credit and has not paid for. if he is guilty of any false re- presentation, or other fiuud, for the purpose of obtaining the consent of his creditors, or any of them, to any agree- ment with reference to his affairs, or his banfa^ptcy, or liquidation, not surrendering upon the day limited, and signing and subscribing surrender, and submitting to be ex- amined. ' M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. M, Ibid M, Ibid M, Ibid M, Ibid M, Ibid M, Ibid M, Ibid M, Ibid M, unp.3yr8,atthe discretion of the court. ! & 33 Vict, V. 12, s. 11. Ibid. Ibid. [bid. Ibid. Ibid. 24 & 25 Vict. 134, s. 221. Crimes and their Punishments. Bankrttptct (coufwiued) : bankrupt or his wife, or any other person, giving false evidence. wilfully and corruptly swearing or affirming faJselj before a registrar. wilfully and corruptly making any declaration for proof of debt knowing the same or the statement pf account ap- pended to be untrue in any material particular. forging signature of commis- sioner or officer or seal of court. inserting without authority, or knowing same to be false, any advertisement in London Gazette, or other newspaper pretending to be under the acts. Bigamy Bribery, see " Elections," BURGLART : entering the dwelling-house of another at night with intent to commit felony therein, or being in such committing a felony , and in either cf breaking out. entering dwelling-house at night with intent to commit felony. Cattle, see " Larceny," and " Malicious Injuries," post. Chain Cable or Akchor : stamping, or assisting stajnping of, vritji mark of tester without authority, with intent, &c. ^HALLEITGE : sending of, &c ChILDREIT : taking away or decoying when nnder fourteen years of age, or with intent to steal clothes of, or receiving knovpingly decoyed child. procuring defilement of girl under 21. [" Eape." carnal knowledge Qf, see M, same as pei^jury. M, Ibid M, Ibid F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 3 yrs h. 1. M, fine or imp, or both. P, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2yrsh. l,s. c. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, a. G. M, fine or imp, or both. F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp, 2 yrs h, 1, and male under 16 w. M!, imp, 2 yrs h. 1, and fine in addition or in lieu, and sure- ties for good beha- viour. 12 & 13 Vict. c. 106, s. 254 (and see " Perjury," post) . 24 & 25 Vict. 0. 134, s. 54. Ibid. s. 145. Ibid. s. 205, and see8&9Vict.c. 113, s. 4 J 20 & 21 Vict. c. 3, s. 2. 12 & 13 Vict. c. 106, s. 272. 34 & 25 Vict. c. 100, s. 57. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 96, a. 52. Ibid. 3. 54. 27 & 28 Vict. u. 27, a. 12. Common law,. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100, s. 56. Ibid. ss. 69, 71. Crimes and their Punishments. Childkek (omiMmed,) : indecent assault upon, or at- M, imp. 2 yrs 24 & 25 Vict. c. tempt to have carnal know- 100, s. 66, ledge of, where under 12. abandonment or exposure of, M, P. S. 5 yrs, or Ibid. ». 27. under age of 2 years ; and see imp, 2 yrs h. 1, " Concealing Birth," post. Clebotiiah : preventing from officiating or M, imp. 2 yrs, and 24, & 25 Vict. u. obstructing, or assaulting or fine in addition or 100, a. 36, arresting while engaged in. in lieu, and sure- or about to engage in, his ties. clerical rites or duties. Coin: falsely making or counterfeit- F, P. S, life, or imp. 24 & 25 Vict. c. ing any coin resembling, or 2 yra h, 1, s, o. 99, s. 2. intending to resemble, or pass for any current gold or silver coin. colouring of, or of pieces of P, Ibid. Ibid. s. 3. metal to pass for gold or silver coin, or colouring or altering genuine silver or for a higher coin. impairing gold or sUver coin P, P, S. M yrs, or Ibid. s. 4. with intent to pass same. imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. P, P. S. 7 yrs, imp. Ibid. s. 5. or clippings of gold, or silver coin, buying or selling counterfeit 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. P, P. S. life, imp. 2 Ibid. s. 6. coin. yrs h. 1, s. c. importing counterfeit coin ... P, Ibid Ibid. s. 7. exporting ditto M, imp. 2 yrs, h. 1, Ibid. s. 8. uttering ditto s. c. M, imp,lyrh. l,s.o. Ibid, s, 9. uttering, accompanied by pos- M, imp, 2 yrs, h. 1, Ibid. s. 10. session of other counterfeit s. c. coin, or followed by a second uttering. having three or more pieces of M, P, S. 5 yrs, imp. Ibid. s. 11. counterfeit gold or silver coin 2 yrs h. 1, s. o. in possession, with intent, &c. every second offence of utter- P, P. S. life, imp. 2 Ibid. B. 12. ing, &c. yrs h. 1, s. c. uttering foreign coin, medals. M, imp. 1 yr h. 1, Ibid. B. 13. as current coin, &o., with s. c. intent to defraud. counterfeiting copper coin, &c. P, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. Ibid. 0. 14. uttering base copper coin, and M, imp,lyrh.l,s, c. Ibid, s, 15. having in possession, with intent to utter three pieces of such. defacing by stamping names or M, imp, 1 yr h, 1. Ibid. s. 16. words thereon. counterfeiting foreign gold or P, P, S, 7 yrs, or Ibid. =. 18. silver coin. imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. bringing such into the kingdom P, P. S. 7 yrs, imp. 2 yra h. 1, s. o. Ibid. a. 19. uttering such ,. M, imp. 6 mths h. 1. Ibid. s. 20. second offence M,imp. 2yrsh.l,3.c. Ibid, s, 21, Crimes and their Punishments, Cots {contmued) : third oifeuce counterfeiting foreign coin other than gold or silver. making, mending, or posseBsing coining tools. conveying tools or moneys out of the mint without au- thority. accessories in case of every felony punishable under 24 & 25 Vict. c. 99. accessories after the fact COITCEALIITG BiBTH QP CHILD : GOB'SFIBACY : to charge another with crime, to defraud or injure others, to commit any offence, to prevent the course of justice, to effect legal purposes by improper means, of journey- men to raise wages. COPTEIGHT IN BOOES : maldng false entry in the Eeg- ister Book of the Stationers Company, or producing, or causing to be tendered, in evidence, any paper falsely purporting to be a copy of such entry. Cetteltt (and see "Children" •post) DaKgeeotts Goods : delivery of, sending of, deposit- ing oz, &c. Disobedience : of justices* order, or of direc- tion or prohibition of statute to which no penalty is an- nexed. Drivers of Caekia&es : doing bodily harm by wilful misconduct, or wilful ueglect. Election : making false answer to ques- tions of returning officer. . personation ... ^^. ... falsely, or fraudulently s^ning voter's declaration of place of abode, bribery, tindue influence, mak- ing payments not through authorised agents. P, P. S. life, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, F, P. S. 7 yrs, imp, 2 yrs h. 1, s. o. P, P. S. life, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, P, Ibid F, same as princi- pal in first. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1,.„ M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1..., M, fine or imp. or both (h. 1. 14 & 15 ■ Vict. c. 100, s. 29). M, fine or imp, or both. M, fine or imp. or both. M, penalty not ex- ceeding 5001, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, and forfeiture of the goods. M, fine or imp. or both. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. . M, fine or imp. or both. M, Ibid M, fine or imp. not exceeding 1 yr, and declaration may be impounded. M, fine or imp. or both. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 99, s. 21. Ibid. s. 22. Ibid. s. 24. Ibid. s. 25, Ibid. B. 35. Ibid. 24 & 25 Vict. u. 100, s. 60. Common law. 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, s. 12. Common law. 29 & 30 Vict. 69, ss. 3-5. Common law. 24 & 25 Vict, u, 100, s. 35, 6&7Vict. u. 18, s. 81, Ibid. ss. 83, 89. ; 28 Vict. c. 36, 8. 11. 17 & 18 Vict. c. 102, ss. 2, 3, 5. h Crimes and their Punishments. Election {conivtmeA) -. agent or candidate, fornislpizig tmtrue Btatement of expenses falsely signing, &c. voting paper (universities.) ElUIBEZZLEMENT : by an officer of the Bank of England. Entbt (foecibIiE) : into a freehold or leasehold ... Escape and Eesctte : escaping from penal servitude before time. rescue of a convict from gaoler, &c. of a murderer or his body after execution. officer having person in charge for felony, voluntarily per- mitting Ms escape. breaking prison when in cus- tody for capital offence. when in custody on a minor charge, rescuing person convicted of felony. charged with ditto, or convict- ed of misdemeanor. aiding to escape, or conveying into prison any article to facili^te such. rescuing a prisoner charged with treason, if subsequently convicted. aiding the escape of a prisoner, in custody for treason or felony, while being conveyed to prison, or in prison. in custody for petty larceny, or for debt of 1001., do. aiding prisoners, of war to escape. M, fine or. imp. or both. M, fine or imp. not exceeding 1 yr. P. P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, male under 16 w. P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. H, imp. and ransom at Sovereign's will, restitution of pro- perty, or fine or imp. or both. F, P. S. life, and pre- vious imp. not ex- ceeding 4 yrs h. 1. or P. S. life. P, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. ... P, P. S. life, or imp. 3 yrs h. 1. (in case ofbody,P.S.7yrs.; P, or M.* P, the same as the person escaping was sen- tenced to ; M, fine and imp. h. 1. F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, and w. M, fine and imp, h. 1. F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 3 yrs, and not less than 1 yr. M, fine and imp. P, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. P, punishment as traitor, or P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 4 yrs. F, P. S. 7 yrs. IVT, fine aad imp. ... F, P. S. life 17 & 18 Vict. c. 102. s. 4. 24 & 25 Vict. u. 53, s. 5. 24 & 25 Vict. c. I, s. 68. Ibid. «. 73. 5 Bic. 2, c. 8; 15 Eic. 2, c.2j 31 Eliz. c. 11; 21Jac.l, c. 15; 8 Hen. 6. c. 9;. Common law. 5 Geo. 4, c. 84, s.22j4&5WiU. 4, c. 67. Ibid, and 56 Geo. 3,c.27,ss.7,l3. 25 Geo. 2, c. 37, ss. 9, 10. Common law. lEdw.2, st.2,c. 1 ; 7 & 8 Geo. 4,. c. 28, ss. 8, 9. Common law. 1 & 2 Geo. 4, c. 88, s. 1. Common law. 28 & 29 Vict. c. 126. 8. 37. Common law, and l&2Geo. 4, c. 88. 16 Geo. 2, c. 31, ss. 1, 3. Ibid. 52 Geo. 3, c. 156, s. 1. * This is felony if prisoner escapes after conviction j misdemeanor, if before. The officer cannot be convicted of felony tiU after the con- viction of the delinquent, bat can be punished for a misdemeanor. Grimes and their Punishments. Excise : armed persous, rescuing of- ienders, assaulting officers, informers, &c. False Pbbtences : by, obtaining aaiy money, chat- tel, &o. by, procuring any money to be paid, or chattel,- or valuable security to be delivered to- an^ person. fraudulently causing any per- son, by false pretences, to execute, &c., ttae -whole or part of any valuable security, or to write, or impress, or affix his name, or- that of any company or partnership, or- the seal of any body corpo- rate, upon any paper or parchment, in order that the same may be afterwards made, or converted into, ox dealt with as a -valuable security. attempting to obtain property, as above. False Scales and W^ishts : selling by Fish; taking, or destroying in water running through Imid adjoin- ing the dwelUng-house of a person o-wning such water, or having a right of £shing. FOEGEKT : - forging the Great Seal, Privy Seal, &c. East India honds Exchequer bUls, bonds, and debentures. bank notes wills bills of exchange, and promis- , sory notes. debentures proceedings of Courts ofEecord or Courts of Bctuity. .ti^nsfei: of Stock of Bank of England, or of Incorporated Societies, &s., or power of . attorney relating thereto,- or demanding to act- by virtue . of -forged power of attorney, deeds, bonds, &G. orders, receipts, &c. for money, goods, &c. court rolls ... P, P. S. 7 yrs. M, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. 0. M, Ibid M. Ibid. Tvr , fine and imp. Fine or imp. or both (and h. 1; 14 & 15 Tiot. 0. 100, s. 29.) M, fine or imp. or both, and sureties. F, P. S. UEe, or imp, 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. F, Ibid F, Ibid F, Ibid F, Ibid F, Ibid F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2yrsh.l,s. c. F, P. S. 7 yrs, oi imp.2yrsh.l, s. o. F, P. S. life, or imp, 2 yrs h. 1, B. c. F, P. S. life, or imp. 2-yrsh. 1, s. o. F, Ibid P, Ibid. ... ... 23 & 24 Vict. c. 114, s. 200. 24 & 25 Vict. 0. 96, B. 88. Ibid. s. 89. Ibid. s. 90. Common law. Ibid. 24 & 25 Tict. c. 96, s. 24, 24 & 25 Vict, c 98, B. 1. Ibid. s. 7. Ibid. s. 8. Ibid. Ibid. Ibid. s, 12. S.21. B. 22. Ibid. S.26. Ibid. ».27. Ibid. s. 2. Ibid. s. 20. Ibid, s, 23. Ibid. s. 30. Onmes and their Punishments. FoEGEET (contmued) : orders of justices, recogni- sances, affidavitSf &c. forging' name of Accottntant- General of Court of Chance^ in England or Ireland, or of judge of Landed Estates Court, Ireland. copies or certificates of records, proceeds of courts not of re- cord, and using forged process instruments made evidence by acts of Parliament. making' false entries of stock in public funds, &c. demanding property upon forg- ed instruments. making, or accepting bill, or note, &c. by procuration, ■without lawful authority, or uttering such with intent to defraud. obliterating crossing on cheques personating owner of stock, or endeavouring to transfer, or receive the dividends from stock in such. forging attestation to, power of attorney for transfer of stock, &c. making out false dividend war- rants, by clerks of Banks of England or Ireland. falsely acknowledging recog- nisances. making plates, &c., in imitation of those used for Exchequer bills. making paper, in imitation of that used for Exchequer bills. having in possession paper, plates, or dies, to be iwed for Exchequer bUls, &c. piu:chasing, or receiving, or having forged, bank notes or biUs. national debt, register, trans- fer, &c., or personating nomi- nees under act enabling the commissioners to grant an- nuities. certificates relating to quaran- tine. dies, &c., for stamping gold or silver wares. stamps on parchment, &c. makihg or having mould for making paper with the words Bank of England, or witii curved bar lines, &c. F, P. S. 5 yrs, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. F. P. S. 14 yrs, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. F, P. S: 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, t s. c, F, Ibid. F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. P, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. F, Ibid. F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. l,s.c. F, Ibid F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. s. c. F,Ibid F, Ibid. M, imp. 3 yrs h. 1. (or fine and sure- ties, s. 51.) P, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. F, P. S. life, or imp. 4 yrs, h, 1, s. c. F, P. S. 7 yra, or imp. 2 yrs h, 1, s. c. P, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 3 yrs, h. 1. P. P. S. life, or imp. 4 yrs. P, Ibid 24 & 25 Vict. c. 98, s. 32. Ibid. 8. 33. Ibid. 8. 28. Ibid. B. 29. Ibid. B. 5. Ibid. s. 38. Ibid. a. 24. Ibid. 8. 25. Ibid. a. 3. Ibid. s. 4'. Ibid. a. 6. Ibid. 8. 34. Ibid. s. 9, Ibid. B. 10. Ibid. s. U. Ibid. s. 13. 2 & 3 Will, 4, c. 59, 8. 19. 6 Geo. 4,0. 78, s. 7 & 8 Vict. c. 22, s. 2. 3 & 4 Will. 4, c. 97, 8. 12. Ibid. 8. 14. -^Cnmes and their Punishments, cxxxvii FoRGEET (continued) : en^aving,or having any plate, &Ct for maMng notes of Bank of En^lajid, or other banks, or uttering or havingpaperupon which, a blank note, &c., is printed. engraving on a platet&o., any number, word, device, &c., resembling paxt of a bank note, or bill, or of note, &c., of other bankers, orusingi or having any such plate, &c., or uttering, or having pUper on which any such worck, &o. is impressed. m&Mng, or having mould for making paper with the name of any banker, or making, or having such paper. engraving plate for foreign bill's or notes, or using, or having such plates, or uttering paper on which any part of such bill, or note is printed. registers of deed!s marriage licenses accessories after the fact in felonies under this act. alders in misdemeanor ditto ... o:fficial documents, decrees, or- ders, private acta, &c. seals, signatures, &c., under Probate Court Act. ditto Divorce Court foiling or uttering instru- ments not provided for Xty statute, Pkatjdulekt Tbttstees : banker, merchant, broker, attorney, or otiher agent entrusted with money or security with direction in writing to apply same for any specified purpose, converting to his own usie, or entrusted with any chattel or valuable security or power of attorney for sale or transfer of interest in public or other funds, for safe custody or special pur- pose without author!^ to sell, selling, converting, &c., such. F, P, S. life, or imp. •4 yrs. F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs. h. 1, s. c. F, Ibid. F, Ibid. F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp.2jrs. h. I, s. c. F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. a yrs, h. 1, s. c. F, imp, 2 yrs, h, 1, s. c. Same as principal. F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp, 3 yrs, h. 1. F, P. S. life, and not less than 7 yrs, or imp. 3 yrs, and not less than 1 yr, F, Ibid M, fine or imp, or both. M, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2yrBh.l, s. c. 3 & 4 Will. 4, c. 97, s. 16. Ibid. s. 17. Ibid. s. 18. Ibid. s. 19. Ibid. a. 31. Ibid, s. 35, Ibid. a. 49. Ibid. 8&9ViGt.c.ll3, s,4j 7&8Geo. 4, c. 28, s. 4 • 11 & 12 Vict, c. 78, 5. 6. 21 & 2^ Vict. u. 95, s. 33. 21 & 22 Vict. . 108, s. 22. Common law. 24 & 25 Vict, 96, s. 75. A3 Primes and their Pumshments* FKiTJDtTLEMT TRUSTEES (con- tmued) \ bankerB;t.iiierc!baiits, &c. fraudu- lently converting property entrusted to them. persons under powers, ditto ..^ trustees,, ditto directors, &c. of public com- panies or bodies corporate, appropriating- the property of the company. ditto, l^eeping fraudulent ac- counts. ditto, destroying boobs, &c. ... ditto, publishing fraudulent statements. Pkiendlt Societies : circulating false copies of rules, or alterations of rules. GAME} taking game orrabbits by night, or using net for taking same on laud or the high road, after two previous summary con- victions. offenders committing the above oifence, and assaulting keeper with gun. three or more persons together by night, entering or being upon land with olf ensive wea- pons, to take game or rabbits. taking, or killingat night, hares or rabbits in any warren, en- closed or not. M. P. S. 7 yrs, oi imp. 2 yrs, h. 1, B. c. M, Ibid M, Ibid M, Ibid M, Ibid, M, Ibid. M, Ibid, M, fine or imp, or both. M, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2yrsh. 1, GuHPOWDEB, see "Malicious In- juries." HOTTSEBBEAKIDTQ i breaking into and committing a felony within the curtilage of abuilding,and occupied there- with, but not part thereof, or being in such a building and eommittingfelpny,and break- ing out, breaking and entering, atid committing felony, or having committed felony, breaking out of any dwelling-house, school-house, shop, ware- bouse, or counting-house. breaking and entering any dwelling-house, place of di- vine worship or building, ■within the curtilage, school- liouse, shop, ware or count- ing house, with intent to commit a f elony« 24 & Ibid, s, Ibid, B, Ibid, B< Ibid. Ibid. B. Ibid. B. 25 Vict. .76, .77. .80. 81. M, Ibid. M. fine or imp, or both, M, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 3 yrs h. 1, P, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp, 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, F, Ibid. F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. 18 & 19 Vict. "-,8,29. !0 & 21 Vict, 3, s, 1-2. Ibid. s. 2. Ibid. s. 9. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 96, B. 17. t & 25 Vict, e. )6, a. 55. Ibid. s. 56, Ibid, s. 57. Crimes and their Funishments. Housebreaking (contmued) : , being' foimd by nigrht, armed with weapon or instrument with, intent to break, or enter into any dwelling-boude, or other building, with intent to commit felony, or having in jTOSsession, without lawful ex- cuse, any picklock, key, crow, jack, bit, or other implement of housebreaking, or being found atnight with face black- ened, or disguised with in- tent, &c., or being found in any dwelling-house or build- ing by night, with intent, &g. anyone convicted of any of the above misdemeanors (s. 58), aftisr a previous conviction for either felony or sudh misde- meanor. Ihdecent Assault, see "Assault* Ihdecent Exposube : of the person, or the printing, publishing, or exposing to Tiew, obscene writings or prints, Labcehy : simple as bailee after previous convicUpn for felony. after conviction of indictable misdemeanor. after two summary convictions under 7 & 8 Geo. 4, cc. 29, 30, or 10 & 11 Vict. c. 82, or 24 & 25 Vict. cc. 96, 97. cattle killing cattle with intent to steal. killing deer in nninclosedf orest, second offence, killing, hunting, or carrying away, or attempting to kill deer in inclosed ground, stealing dog, after previous summary conviction, possession of stolen dog, after previous summary conviction corruptly taking money for aidmg to recover any dog. M, P. S. 5 yrs, or impi 2 yrs h. 1, and sureties for the peace. M, P. S. 10 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. SI, fine or imp. or both,h.l. P, P. S. 5 yrs, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, and male under 16 w, P. Ibid. F, P. S. 10 yrs, and not less than 7, and imp, and whipping as above. F, P. S. 7 yrs, imp. and whippixig a^ above. F, Ibid P, P. S. 14 yrs, imp, as above. Fj same punishment AS for stealing, provided the steal- ing would have amounted to a felony, F, im^. as above, whipping as above. F, Ibid, M, imp.lSmthsh.!. M, Ibid M,imp.l&xiith»h.l. 24 & 25 Vict. 96, s. 58. Ibid. B. 59'. Common law. 24 & 25 Vict, u, 96, s. 4. Ibid. s. S. Ibid. s. 7, Ibid. a. 8. Ibid. s. 9. Ibid, s. 10. Ibid. s. 11. Ibid. s. 12. Ibid. s. 13. Ibid, s. 18. Ibid. s. 19. Ibid. 8, 20. cxl Grimes and their Punishments* Laecent {continued,) : ■ Btealingf oysters fromfisliery... rising dredpe or otlier instru- ment witliiii the limits of an oyster bed for the purpose of taking oysters^ though none he actually taken, or dira^ging upon the ground of such fishery, stealing bonds, 'bills, notes, or for ttaudulent purpose des- troying, cancellmg, oblitera- ting the whole, or any part of any valuable security, other than a document of title to lands. ditto (destroyiog or conceal- ing) of whole or part of any document of title to lands. ditto of wills ditto of records or other original document of Court of Becord, or document relating to Grovernment offices. metal, &c,, fixed to buildings ... trees, shrubs, &g., stealing, or damaging with intent to steal, in any ^ park, pleasure . ground, garden, orchard, avenue, or ground belonging to a dwelling-house, in case the value exceeds 11. stealing, &c., when growing any- where else than described above, in case the value ex- ceeds 51. wheresoever growing, to value of !«., after two previous summary convictions. ' the like oSences in respect to plants, fruits, &c. in gardens, . after one previous Bummary conviction. frommines from mines, by those employed therein. . robbery and larceny from the person. by menaces or threats, demand- ing property with intent to steal. in houses, to the value of 5Z. or more. and putting anyone therein in bodily fear by menaces or threats. in manufactories, goods, or materials to the value of 10s. or more. in ships and wharfs goods belonging to any ship in distress, or patt of such ship F, as simple larceny. M, imp, 3 mths h. 1, B. c, F, same as simple larceny. F, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s, c. F, Ibid F, as simple larceny. F, Ibid. F, Ibid. F, Ibid Ibid. s. 33. P.Ibid/ Ibid. s. 36. P.imp. Syrali.l.B.c. P, Ibid Ibid. s. 38. Ibid. s. 39. P, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, P, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. Ibid. a. 40. Ibid. s. 45. P, P. S. W yrs, or imp. 2yrsli. 1, s.o. Ibid. s. 60. Ibid. s. 61 P, Ibid Ibid. s. 62 P, Ibid P, Ibid Ibid. s. 63 Ibid. s. 64 24 & 25 Vict. c. 96, s. 26. Ibid. Ibid. a. 27. Ibid. s. Ibid. s. Ibid. a. Ibid, s, 31. Ibid. s. 32. Ibid. Cnmes and their Punishments, cxli Larceht (cowtmued) : . by clerks or servants by tenants or lodgers, of chat- tels or fixtures let to the offender, where value not exceeding hi. the like, where value exceedsSl. Letter (Threatening) : to kill to burn denmnding money threatening to accuse of crime punishable by death or penal servitude not less than seven years, or of assault with in- tent to commit rape, or of any attempt or endeavour to commit rape, or of any infamous crime (buggery with man or beast, assault to commit such, or attempt or solicitation to move any person to permit it) with ^ intent to extort. See " Accusing of Crime " (threats not by letter). Libel : publishing or threatening to publish any libel upon any ■ person, or threatening to permit and publish; or pro- posing to abstain or prevent the publishing of any matter or thing touching any other person with a view to extort money, &c. false defamatory libel malicious ditto blasphemous ditto against the person and govern- ment of the Sovereign, or against either House of Parliament.the constitution, or the administration of justice. Lotteries ... .^ Lunatics : receiving pauper into county or borough asylum vrithout order an,d medical certificate reqxured. the like a person not a pauper P, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2yrs h. 1, s. c, male under 16 w. P, imp. 2 yrs h, 1, B. p, and male under 16 w. P, P. S. 7 yrs, imp. &c. as above. P, P. S. 10 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, male under 16 w. P, Ibid P, P. S. life, imp. &c. as above. P, Ibid M, imp. Syrsh. 1.... M, imp. 2 yrs, and such fine as the court may award, M, imp. 1 yr, or fine or both. Pine and imp. Pine or imp.or both. To he deemed com- mon nuisances. M, fine or imp, or both. M, Ibid, 24 & 25 Vict. M. 96, s. 67. Ibid. s. 74. Ibid. 24 & 25 Vict. u. 100, s. 16. 24 & 25 Vict. 0. 97, s. 50. 24 & 25 Vict, u, 96, a. 44. Ibid. s. 46. 6 & 7 Vict. c. 96, 8.3. Ibid. s. 4, Ibid. s. 5. Common law. Ibid. 42 Geo. 3, c. 119, s. 1. 16 & 17 Vict. c. 97, s. 73. Ibid. s. 74. cxlii Crimes and their Punishments. Lunatics (cont'mvsd) : clerk of asylum making un- true entry of death, dis- charge, or removal of a patient. physician, &c., signing false certificate, or person signing certificate as physician, &c., when not such. officer, attendant, &c., striking, ill - treating, or neglecting lunatic. as to private asylums, see 8 & 9 Vict. c. 100, ss. 23, 27, 29, 44, 49, 50, 52, 54, 59, 63, 64, 68, 90, and 16 & 17 Tict. c. 96, ss. 4, 5, 7, 9. 13, 14, 18. , criminal lunaticSj the rescuing any person being conveyed to an asylum for criminal lunatics during his convey- ance thereto, or any officer &c., in asylum permitting es- cape, or conniving at it. any of^cer, &c., ill-using or ne- glecting persons confined in asylum for criminal lunatics. Malicious Injukies to the Person : poisoning, stabbing, wounding, &c., with intent to murder. administration of poison so as to endanger life, ditto with intent to annoy ... attempt to murder by poison- ing, shooting, strangling, drowning, suffocating, or in any other way. wounding with intent to maim or resist lawful apprehension. ■ inflicting bodily injury with or without weapon. attempting to choke with in- tent to commit indictable offence. using chloroform with intent as above. damaging a building with in- tent to murder. setting fire to ship or her apparel with intent to murder. maiming by explosion of gun- powder. gunpowder, caumng to ex- plode, or, sending explo- sive substance to any per- son, or throwing corrosive liquid. gunpowder, placing of, in or near a building with intent to jdo bodily injury. . . M, fine or- imp, or both. M, Ibid. M, Ibid, or sum- marily. F, P. S. 5 yrs, or 23 & 24 Vict. 0. imp. 2 TTB h. 1. 75, s. 12, and see also soviet. 0. 12, ss. 5, 6. M, fine or imp. h. 1. Ibid. o. 13. or fine and imp. or P, P. S. life, or imp. 24 & 25 Viot. u. 2yrsli. 1, s. c. 100, a. 11. P, P. S. 10 yrs, or Ibid. s. 23. imp. a yrs h. 1. M, P. S. 5 yrs, or Ibid. s.24. imp. 2 yrs h. 1. P, P. S. life, imp. 2 Ibid. s. 14, 15. yra h. 1, s. o. F, P. S. life, or imp. Ibid. s. 18. 2 yrs li. 1, s, c. M, P. S. 5 yrs, imp. Ibid. B. 20. 2 yrs h. 1. F, P. S. life,orimp. Ibid. s. 21. 2 yrs h. 1. {and w. 26 & 27 Viot. 0. 44.) F,Ibid. w. excepted. Ibid. s. 22. P, Ibid, and s. c. Ibid. s. 12. P, Ibid, and s.u. Ibid. ». IS. Ibid, and w. in case Ibid. s. 28. of male under 16. P. Ibid. „ ... Ibid. B. 29. 16 & 17 Viot. «. 97, s. 93. Ibid. s. 122. Ibid. s. 12S. P, P. S. 14 yrs, imp. as before. Ibid. 9. 30. Crimes and their Punishments. cxliii Malicious Injueies to Pko- PEETT : tlirowin^ into, upon, near, &c., any Building with, intent to damage it or machinery, &<;., gunpowder or explosive substance, whetlier damage caused or not. injuries to, toy rioters malicious injuries to,bT tenants machinery, materials for manu- factures, &c. ditto agricultural machinery... hopbinds ,. trees, shrubs, &c., growing in any park, pleasure-ground, orchard, &;c., or any ground adjoiniug or belonging to a pleasure ground, where amount of injury exceeds £1. the like growing elsewhere, where the damage exceeds £5. the like, wheresoever growing, the injury being not less than Is., after two previous summary convictions. the hke offences in respect to plants, fruits, &c., in gar- dens, &c., after one previous summary conviction. mines, setting fire to a coal mine. attempting to set fire to a mine. conveying water into them damaging engines belonging to them., to sea and river banks ... removing piles, chalk, &e., used for securing sea bank or sea. wall, or opening sluice or floodgate, or other damage to navigable river or canal with intent to obstruct the navigation. to ponds to bridges, viaducts, &c. turnpikes and toll bars... telegraphs works of art P, P. S. U yrSj or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, male under 16 w. F. Ibid M, fine and imp. or both. P, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. o, male under 16 w. F, P. S. 7 yrs, imp. as above. P, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. l,t s. c, and miale under 16 w. P, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2yrsh.l, s. c, and male under 16 F, Ibid. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. G, and mole under 16 w. P, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, and male under 16 w. F, P. S. life, or imp. &c., as above. F, P. S. 14 yrs, imp. &;c., as above. P, P. S. 7 yrs, imp. &;c., as above. F, Ibid P, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, and male under 16 w. F, P. S. 7 yrs, the rest as in last offence. M, Ibid Ibid. s. 32. F, P. S. life, or imp. Ibid. s. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, male under 16 w. M, fine or imp. or Ibid, b, 34. both. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1.... Ibid. s. 37. M, imp. 6 mths h. 1, Ibid. s. 39. male under 16 w. ' 24 & 25 Vict. 97, s. 10. Ibid. s. 11, Ibid. e. 13 and common law. Ibid. s. 14. Ibid. a. 15. Ibid. s. 19. Ibid. B. 20. Ibid. a. 21. Ibid. s. 2.2. Ibid. s. £ Ibid. Ibid. Ibid. Ibid. s. 26. S.27. s. ^ Ibid. s. 30. Ibid. a. 31. cxliv Crimes and their Punishments. Malicious Istxubies to Pro- PEKTT (oontmited) : cattle „ Bhips— damage otherwise than by fire or explosive sub- stances. masking, siltering, &c., any signal, or maliciously doing anything tending to the im- mediate loss or destruction of a ship for which no punish- ment provided. cutting adrift, altering, con- cealing, &c., boat, buoy, rope, &c., iatended for the guid- ance of seamen, or the pur- poses of navigation. destroying any part of any vessel in distress, or stranded or cast ashore, or any goods of any kind belonging to such vessel. other injuries to real or per- sonal property not provided for in the act, &c., exceeding £5. the like offence, if committed between nine in the evening and six in the morning. unlawfully or maliciously placing, throwing upon, or into, &c., any ship, gun- powder, or other explosive substance, with intent to destroy or damage, whether injury effected or not, making or manufacturing, or knowingly having in posses- sion gunpowder, or explo- sive substance, or dangerous or noxious thing or machine, &c., with intent thereby, or by means thereof, to commit, or enable another to commit, any felonies mentioned in this act (24 & 25 Vict. c. 97.) Ibid, as 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100, and see " Arson." Manslaughteb Mabikes " Ship." (DESEBTioiir), see IVlABItlAGE : clergyman solemnising at im- proper time or place, or pot- son falsely pretending to be in holy orders aolemnisin g . F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2yr8h. I, s.c. F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s.c. F, P. S. life, or imp, 2 yrs h. 1,^ s. c, and male under 16 w. F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp, 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, and male under 16 w. F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp, 2 yrs h. 1, B. o, male under 16 w, M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. M, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. F, P. S. 4 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, male under 16 w. Mt imp, 2 yrs h. 1, 8. c, male under 16 w. M, Ibid. F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, or £ne m addition, or fine alone. F, P. S. 14 yrs. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 97, s. 40. Ibid. B. 46. Ibid. 8. 47. Ibid. s. 48. Ibid. u. 49. Ibid. B. 51. Ibid. Ibid. B. 45. Ibid. s. 54. 24 & 25 Vict. 0. 100, s. 64. t4 & 25 Vict. u. 100, B. 5. 4 Geo. 4, c, 76, s. 21. Crimes and their Punishments. cxlv Medical FBACTixioHEsa : . any registrar making falBlflca- tiou in any matter connected with the register, any person fraudtilently pro- curing himself to be regis- tered under the act, or at- tempting to do so. SIiLiTABT Law : conveying into prison tools, &G,, to facilitate escape of prisoner, or aiding by any means the escape of prisoner. MrinoiPAi CoEPOEATiOHS Act : . offences against HirsD£B accessories after the fact . conspiring to murder any per- son, whether subject of Her Majesty or not, and whether lie be within the Queen's do- . . minions or not, and soliciting to the murder of any per- son as above. Naval Sioses : without authority (proof on accused) applying the au- thorised marks of ownership in or on stores. with intent to conceal Her Majesty's property in any stores,obliterating,&c,whoUy or in part such mark. without authority (proof on accused)receiving, &c. stores, bearing such mark, or part thereof, if above 51. in value. NmSANCE : obstructing highway, &c. Oaths (unlawful) : administering, or causing to be administered, oath to commit treason, murder.orany felony punishable with death. taking same without being compelled. administering to, &c., or pre- sent at, Ebdministration . of oath to disturb public peace, or engage in seditious pur- poses, or taking same with- out being compelled. M, imp. not exceed- 1 yr. M, Ibid F, P. S. 6 yrs, and not less than i yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. M, P. S, 5 yrs, or imp, 2 yrs h, 1, or fine. P, death. P, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs. M, P. S. 10 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. M, imp. 1 yr h. 1. M, fine or imp. or both. P, P. S. life, and not less than 15 yrs, or imp. 3 yrs h 1, s. c. P, P. S. life. P, P. S. 7 yrs. 21 & 22 Vict. 90, s. 38. Ibid. s. 39. 30 Vict. c. 13, s. 20&21Vict.c.54, s. 10; 23 Vict. c. 18, s. 7. 24 & 25 Vict. 0. 100, S3. 1, 2, 3, and 31 Vict. c. 24. 24 & 25 Vict. c. lOO, a. 67. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100, a. 4. 30 & 31 Vict. 0. 119, s. 5. Ibid. s. 6. Ibid. s. 7. Common law. i Geo. 3, c. 104, !. 1. Ibid. 37 Geo. 3, c. 123, s. 1. cxlvi Crimes and their Punishments. Oaths (voluntary) : . justice of tlie peace, or other adininlstermg oatli when not authorised by law. Peejdrt : perjury, or subornation of per- jury. Fersohation : of soldiers for their prize money, &c. of seamen, see "Ships." without lawful authority (onus on accused), acknowledging. recognisance, bail, cognovvb actwnemf &c., or any iustm. ment before judge or person lawfully authorised in that behalf. Piracy : • whether at common law or by statute, assaulting with intent to mur- der, or stabbing, wounding, &c.,or doins anyactwhereby life may be endangered with intent to commit, or at the time, or immediately before, or after committing piracy, PoisoH, see " Malioious In- juries," ante. Police, see " Public Service," PooB: parish officer promoting mar- riage of the mother of a bastard child improperly. wilfully injuring, &&, poor- rate, book, or giving false evidence before union assess- ment committee. person employed in execution of a warrant for removal of Irish poor wilfully deserting pauper on the journey. Post OrriOE : stealing or embezzling letters.. ditto, if contxdning money ... stealing from letters or stealing a post letter bag, letters from it, or a mail, or stopping amail stealing a post letter from a post office packet. M, fine or imp. or both. M, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. h.l,7yrs, and incompetency as witness, or fine and imp. (h. 1, 3 Geo, 4, 0. Hi). P, P. S. life. F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h, 1, s. c. P, the same as if a robbery committed upon land. F, death (sentence recorded 4 Geo. 4, c. 48, s. 1 ; 2 & 3 Tiot. c. 56, s. 17.) M, fine or imp, or both. M.Ibid M, Fine, imp, in de- fault not exceeding 3mths, F, P. S, 7 yrs, or imp. 3 yrs h.l, s.o. F, hfe, or imp. 4 yrs h. 1, s. 0, F, Jbid F, P, S. 14 yrs, or imp. Syrah. 1,8.0. 5 & 6 Will, 4, «. 62, s. 13. 2 Geo. 2, li. 25, s. 2. 9 ft 10 Vict. c. 24, s, 1. 24 & 25 Vict, c, l,s,34. 7 & 8 Geo. 4, c. 28, B. 12. 7 Will. 4 & 1 Vict. 0.88,8.2. 7 & 8 Vict. c. 101, 8. 8. 25 & 26 Viot. c. 103, s. 40, ! & 27 Tiot. c. 19, s, 4, 4 & 1 7 Will. Vict. c. 36, s. 26. Ibid. Ibid. SB, 27, 28. Ibid, 8, Crimes and th&ir PunishmMs, cxlvii Post Office (contwiued) ; receiving letters, bags, money, &o., stolen, embezzled, &o. opening or delaying letters ... retaining or secreting, or re- fusing to deliver up letters, &c., lost ormisdelivered. stealing or detaining parlia- mentary votes, &c., or news- ^pers. writing, &c., in newspapers sent by peat. forging the handwriting of the Beceiver-Greneral of the Post Office. forging the superscription of a post letter. forging dies for marking post- age or postage stamps, oq. maMug m.oulcU, &c., used for postage envelopes, &c. having possession of postage envelopes before issued for public use. accessories after the fact. soliciting others td commit a felony or misdemeanor. officer of post office granting or issuing Emy money order with a fraudulent intent. Peincipals is Second Deqbee, see "Accessories," atde. Peize FiftHT: persons present mid aiding thereat. PiTBLic Service: .larceny by servants embezzlement ditto Queen, The : discharging, &c., firearms at or near the person of the Queen with intent to injure or alarta her, &c. producing gun or explosive matter, &c., near the Queen, ' ' with intent to use the same, &c. Bailwats : servants of comimny guilty of misconduct whilst employed, or negligently doing or omit- ting to do any act whereby life shall be endangered or trains impeded. obstructing engines P, P. S. life, or imp. 4 yrs h. 1, s. c, M, fine or imp. or both, h. 1, B. c, M, fine and imp. h. 1, s, c. M, fine and imp. h. 1, s. c. H, fine or imp. or both. P, P. S. life, or imp. 4 yrs h. 1, s. o. F, P. S. 7yrs P, P. S. life, or imp. 4 yrs. P, P. S. 7 yrSjOrimpf 23TS. M, imp. 3 yrs. F, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, Mi Ibid P, P. S. not less tloan 5 yrs, or imp. 3 yrs. M!, punishable as for assault and riot. F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, a. c. F,Ibid. B.C. excepted M, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 3 yrs h. 1, w. M. Ibid. M, Imp. 2 yrs h. 1.,., M, Ibid. 7WiU.4&lVict. 0.36,8.30. Ibid. s. 25. Ibid. B. 31. Ibid. s. 32. Ibid. s. 5. Ibid. a. 33. Ibid. s. 34. 3 & 4 Yict. c. 96, s. 22. Ibid. s. 29. Ibid. a. 30. 7 Will. 4 &1 Vict, c. 36, a. 35. Ibid. s. 36. 11 & 12 Vict. ^. 88, a. 4. Common law. 24 & 25 Vict, c: 96, a. 69. Ibid. s. 70. 5 & 6 Vict. c. 51, Ibid. 3&4Vict. C.97, ss. 13, 14; 5&6 Yict.c.55,a.l7. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 97, a. 36. cxlriii Crimea cmd their Punishments. Post Office (continued) ; ajiy person, by wilful omission or neglect, endangering the safety of any person con- veyed, or being in or upon a railway, and aiding or assist- ing tberein. placing anything on a railway, or displacing rail or sleeper, or divertin gpoints, or making &c., signal, or maliciously doing other matter with intent in any of these cases to obstruct, upset, or destroy any engine, carriage, &c. ditto witii intent to endanger the safety of any person tra- velling or being upon arailway casting stone, &c., at en^e, &c. « Eafe carnal knowledge of children under ten, ditto between ten and twelve... attempt to have carnal know- ledge of children tinder 12. Beai. Estate : (as to registration) making material false statement, &h3., or suppressing or concealing from registrar material docu- ments, &c., relating to land put upon the registry. fraudulently procuring, &c., order of Court of Chancery in relation to registered land, or the entry on the register of any caveat or notice of a charge, &c. declaration of title (similar oiEences), Keceitebs : where principal offence a felony. where a misdemeanor. Eegisters'; births, deaths, marriages, burials, baptisms, destroying or defacing, or altering, or forging or making false entry in register, giving false cer- tificate, or certifying any writing to be true copy know- ing it not to be such in any materia] particular, or forg- ing tbo seal of register office or burial board, or uttering, &c,, such fraudtilent register or copy of entry. Mjimp. 2yrBh. 1.... F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, male under 16 w. P, Ibid F, P. S, life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. P, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. F, P. S. 5 yrs, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, M,imp. 3 yrs h. 1, or fine, as court shall award. M, imp. 3 yrs, or fine as court may think just. Dl, similar punish- ment. F, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp, 2 yrs h. 1, s. c, male under 16 w. M, P. S. 7 yrs, the rest as above. P, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c» 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100, s. 34. 24 & 25 Tict. c. 97, 8. 35, Ibid. c. 100, s. 32. Ibid. s. 33. 24 & 25 Tict. c. 100, a. 48. Ibid. s. 50. Ibid. a. 51. Ibid. 8. 52. 25 & 26 Vict. u. 53, s. 105, Ibid. BS.138, 139. 25 & 26 Vict. c. 67, ss. 44, 45. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 96, s. 91. Ibid. 8. 95, 24 & 25 Vict. c. 98, S. 36. Crimes and their PunishmeMs. cxlix &E0ISIEB3 {amixmusi) ; inserting, &o., false entry in &ny copy o£ any re^ster di- rected or required by law to be transmitted to any regis- trar, or forging or uttering such, or signing, verifying, &o., copy of register so cE- rected or recLuired to be selit which shall be false in any part thereof, injuring, &c., any such copy. Eeqzsibatioit aitd Mabbuge Acts ; making false declaration, or signing false notice as to marriage, or falsely forbid- ding the issue of the super- intendent registrar's certifi- cate. making false statement for in- sertion in register of birth, death, or marriage. solemnising marriage without licence, or in unregistered building. superintendent registrar un- duly issuing licence for or solemnising marriage de- clared void. Eewabds ; corruptly taking reward for recovery of stolen property without using due diligence to cause offender to be brought to trial. ElOT demolishing buildings ... injuring buildings offences against Itiot Act (1 Geo. 1, Stat. 2, c. 5). seditious meetings, &c. BoBBEBT, see ''Assault" and " Larceny," ante, Sacbilese SAviires Banes : any company, &c., using the title " Savings Bank certified under Act of 1863" not en- titled thereto; F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. s. o. 21 & 25 Yict. 98,s.87. M, the penalties of pejjuiy. M, Ibid. P, P. S imp. 2 s. c, w. F, Ibid. 7 yrs, oi yrs h. 1, F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s, Cj male under 18 w. M, fine or imp, or both (h. 1. 3 Geo. 4, 0. 114.) F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, s. c. M, P. a. 7 yrs, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. P, P. S. life, and not less than 7 yrs, or imp. 3 yrs. M, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs. P, P. S. life, or imp, 2 yrs h 1, s. c. M, fine or imp, or both. 64;7Wai.4,o.85, s. 38; 7 Will. & 1 Vict. c. 22 ; 3 & 4 Vict. c. 72, s. 4 s 19 & 20 Tict. o. 119, ss. 2, 18. 6 & 7 "Will. 4, c. 86, s. 41. 6 & 7Wm. 4. c. 85, s. 39. 7Will.4&lViot. c. 22, S.3. 24 & 25 Yict. u. 96, s. 101. Common law. 24 & 25 Vict. (!. 97, s. 11. Ibid. s. 12. 7 WiU. 4 & 1 Tict. c. 91, ss. 1, 2; 20 & 21 Vict. c. 3, 8. 2 ; 9 & 10 Tict. c. 24, s. 1. 39 Geo. 3, e. 79. 24 & 25 Yict. u. 96, s. 60. 26 & 27 Vict. 0. 87, s. 5. J 3 cl Crimes and their PunishmenU. Savings Banks (contwued) : officer of, receivmg deposits and not duly accounting for them. Scales and Weights : selling by false Sebvanis : master or mistress neglecting to provide necessary food, clothing, and lodging for servant or apprentice. unlawfully doing or causing bodily harm to he done to servant or apprentice so as to endanger health, or render likely to be permanently in- jured. Ships : uttering false petitions, certi- ficates, &c., in order to sus- tain claim to payment from the compassionate fund of , the navy, &c. personating anyone entitled to pay, wages, prize money, &c., payable from Admiralty. masters of ships using impro- per certificate of registry, permitting to he carried papers, &c., with intent to condeaJ. British bhara,cter of ship, or td assume foreign character, or making false declarations of qualifications of owners, falsifying agree- ments of seamen, or assisting therein, &c., not making re- ports of chaxUcter of pennons discharged before snipping master, or making false re- ports of service, &c., foz'cing seamen or apprentices on shore, or leaving them he- hind before completion of voyage, discharging or leav- ing apprentice abroad with- out certificate of some func- tionary, misconduct, breach of duty, &c., endangering the ship, or life, or limb, destroy- ing, mutil&tiug, &c., any entry in official logs, or Inaking a false entry therein, owners and masters not obeying regulations coiScem- ingl^hts, fog signals, sailing rules in Act 25'& 26 Tict. c. 63. 63. 25, 26, 27. t>ilot, guilty of breach of duty, endangering ship, life,orlimb« M, fine or imp, or both. M, fine or imp, or both. M, P. S. 5 yrs, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. M,Ibid. M, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp.2yr'sh making signals to smuggling vessels, after sunset and be- fore sunrise, between 21st Sept. and Ist April, or after 8 p.m. and before 6 a.m. at any other part of the year. armed assemblies, to the num- ber of three or more, for smug- gling, or persons assisting therein. -'Shooting at boats,' &c., within 100 leagues, or wounding officers, &c. of the navy. in company with more than four others with smuggled goods, or with one other person with goodSfOrarmedand disguised* F, P. S. 5 yrs. F, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs. F, P. S. 5 yrs. M, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, or summarily. M, P. S. 7 yrs, or summarily. Pine or imp. h. 1, and summarily. M, P. S. 7 yrs, or fine or imp, or both, the imp. with h. 1, s. c. M, fine lOOZ, or imp. lyrh.L F, P. S.life,notless than 15 yrs, or imp. 3 yrs h. 1, s. c. F, Ibid. P, P. S. 7 yrs. 17 & 18 Vict. c. 104, 8. 179. Ibid. s. 101, and 7 & 8 Geo. 4, c. 28, ss. 8,9. 17 & 18 Vict. c. 104, s. 479. 19 & 20 Vict. c. 41, s. 6. 14 & 15 Vict. c. 102, s. 55. 17 & 18 Vict. c. 104, s. 518. 30 Vict, s. 53. 14, 16 & 17 Vict. c. 107, s. 244. Ibid. B. 248. Ibid. s. 249. Ibid. s. 250. clii Grimes and their Punishments.' SutiooLiiia (contmwcl) : , assaulting or opposing officers on duty, tlie like while aearcbing for goods. , SODOItT (AND BESIIAUTT) attempt to commit, or assault .with intent to commit the same, or an indecent assault upon male. Sfbikq Quns and Man Tkafs : placing, &C. of. SlOCEINa Fhaues : selling or disposing of hired stocking frames,&c.,or receiv- ing, or purchasing same. StTBSEftUEHT FeIOMT : committing felony, not punish- able with death (not being simplelarcenyj^Ji & 25 Vict, c, 96, s, 7) committed after pre- vious conviction for felony, SniciDE : attempting to commit. TELEaKAFHS, See " Malicious In- juries." Tbade Mabes : with intent to defraud, or to enable another to defraud, forging or falsely applying any trade mark, or any forged trade mark to any chattel or article. with intent to defraud, or to enable another to defraud, applying a forged trade mark to any vessel, wrapper, &c. persons aiding in commission of the above offences. TKADIUa COMPAHIES !' director, officer, or contributory of company wound up, falsi- fying books, &c., with intent to defraud or deceive. anv person upon oath, affidavit, '&C.J vrilfully and corruptly giving false evidence. M, P. S. 7 yrs, or imp. 3 yrs h. 1. M, imp. 3 yrs h. 1, in lieu, or in addi- tion to any other punishment or penalty. P. S.life,andnotless than 10 yrs. M, P. S. 10 yrs, and imp. 2 yrs h. 1> M, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp, 2 yrs h. 1. M, imp. 1 yr, not lessthanSmths s.c. F, P. S. life, and not less than 7 yrs, or imp. not exceeding 4 yrs h. 1, s. c, w. IVI, fine, or imp. h. 1 (3 Geo. 4,0.114), or both. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1, or fine, or both Imp. and fine, and imp. till fine be paid. ' M, Ibid, articles to be forfeited or de- stroyed. M, Ibid. M, imp. 2 yrs h. 1... M, penalties of per- 16 & 17 Tiot. c. 107, s. 251. 7 & 8 Geo. i, c. 53, ss. 40, 43. 24 & 25 "Vict. c. 100, 3. 61. Ibid. s. 62. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100, s. 31. iS Geo. 3, c. 55, ss. 2, 3. 30 & 21 Vict. 0. 3, s. 2, and 27 & 28 Vict. 0. 47, 3.1. Common law. 25 & 26 Vict. o. 88, s. 2. Ibidt s. 3, Ibid. s. 13. 25 & 26 Vict. 0. 89, s. 166. Ibid. s. 169. Crimes and their PunishmenU. cliii Trasiitg Cohfahtxes (contvtmed,) : a director^ maziager, or officer of a company wilfully con- cealing' the name of a creditor entitledto object to reduction of capital, or miBrepresenting the nature or aJnount of debt of a creditor, or director, or manager, aiding or abetting, or being privy to such conceal- ment or misrepresentation. forging, or uttering, &c. ashare, warrant or coupon, or a docu- ment, purporting to be such, or endeavouring to get divi- dend by means of forged share warrant, &c. personating owner of share in company, or of share warrant, or coupon, and obtaining or endeavouring to obtain same or any money due to owner. engraving on plate, &c., any share, warrant, or coupon, or having possession, thereof. Treason compassing or devising, &c., to depose Her Majesty or to levy war, in order to intimidate either House of Parliament, of to Stir up foreigners by publishing any printing or writing. accessories after the fact Tbeastibe Trove: concealing the finding from the Crown. Taccihatiok : signing false certificate of suc- cessful vaccination. Valuable Secusitt, see "Lar- ceny" and '• raise Pretences." Vehdoes : seller or mortgagor of land or of chattels, real or personal, or closes m action conveyed to purchaser, or mortgagee, or solicitor, or agent of such, concealing any instrument material to the title, or falsi- fying pedigree in order to in- duce the acceptance of title produced, and with intent to defraud. M, fine or imp, or both. F, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1, fl. c. F, Ibid. P, P. S. 14 yrs, or imp.2yrsh,i, s. c. Death for offences against Sovereign, against others P. S, lue, or imp. 2 yrs. P, P. S. life, or imp. 2 yrs h. 1. P, imp. 2 yrs h. 1. ■ M, fine or imp. or both. M, fine or imp. or both. M, fine and imp.2 yrs h. IjOrfineorbothas court shall award, and liability to ac- tion for damages. 30 & 31 Vict, c, 131, B, 19. Ibid. B. 34. Ibid. Ibid. 11 Vict. c. 12. Ibid. s. 3. Ibid. s. S. Common law. 30 & 31 Vict. c. 84, s. 30. 22 & 23 Vict. c. 35, s. 24j and 23 & 24 Vict. c. 38, 8. 8. cliv Crimes and their 'Punishments. War Defabtmeno: : without lawful authority (onus on accused) applying any of the anthorieed marks of own- ership, in or on any stores. obliteratii^ mark, with intent to conceal Her Majesty's pro- perty in stores. without lawful authority (onus on accused) receiTing,i>08sess- iagt selling, &c., any stores beaTing su^ mark, or part of such mark, knowing them to hear such mark. ■Witchcraft; pretending to use, or pretend- ing from skill in occult science to discover where goods lost or stolen ma^ be found. WOMEIT: by false pretences, false repre- sentations, or other fraudu- lent means, procuring any woman under twenty-one to have illicit connection with a man. Works of Art, see "Malicious Injuries." Workshop Eegtjlatioh" r forging, or counterfeiting certi- ficate required by act, or giving, or signing such falsely, or making use of forged cer- tiiicate, or conniving at these forging Home Secretary's cer- tificate of appointment of In- spector or Sub-Inspector of factories, or makiag use of forged certificate, or falsely pretending to be Inspectoror Sub-]ji8pector of factories. WouHbUTS, see " Assault," and "Malicious Injuries," ante. M, imp. 2 yrs h, 1. F, P. S. 5 yrs, or imp. 2 yrs h, 1, s, c. M, imp. 1 yr h. 1. M, imp. 1 yr, sure- ties for good be- haviour. M, imp. 2 yrs h. I.. M, imp. 3 mths h. 1. M, Ibid. 30 & 31 Vict. u. 128, B. 5. Ibid. s. 6. Ibid. s. 7. 9 Geo. 2, c. 5, H. 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100, 8. 49. » & 31 Vict. 146, s. 17. Ibid. s. 20, THE CRIMINiL LAW CONSOLIDATION ACTS. Ctimiral lato CONSOLIDATION ACTS, 1861. I. ACCESSORIES AND ABETTORS ACT. 24 & 25 Vict. cap. 94. An Actio consolidate and amend the Statute Law of England and Ireland relating to Accessories to and Abettors of indiotcdik Offences. — [6i. 34 11 Geo. 4 &1 WiU. 4, c. 66 2 & 3 Will. 4, c. 4 2 & 3 Will. 4, c. 34 2 & 3 Will. 4, 0.75 2 & 3 Will. 4, 0.123 3 & 4 Will. 4, 0.44 Title of Act. An Act for oonsolidatin g sind amead- ing the la^ra of England rela- tive to larceny and other offences connected therewith. An Act for consolidatingand amend- ing the laws in England relative to malicious injuries to property. An Actforooneolidatingand amend- ing the statutes in England rela- tive to offences against the per- son. An Act for improving the adminis- tration of justice in orimiaal cases in Ireland. An Act for consolidating and amend- ing the laws in Ireland relative to larceny and other offences con- nected therewith. An Act for consolidating andamend- ing the laws in Ireland relative to malicious injuries to property. An Actforconsolidatingandamend- ing the statutes in Ireland relating to offences against the person. An Act for reducing into one Act all such forgeries as shall hence- forth be punished with death, and for otherwise amending the laws relative to forgery. An Act for more effectually pre- venting embezzlements by persons employed in the public service of his Majesty. AnAct for consolidating and amend- ing the laws against offences re- lating to the coin. An Act for regulating schools of. anatomy. An Act for abolishing the punish- ment of death in certain cases of forgery. An Act to repeal so much of two Acts of the seventh and eighth years and the ninth year of King George the Fourth as inflicts the punishment of death upon persons breaking, entering, and stealing in a dwelling-house; also for giving power to the judges to add to the pdnishment of transporta- Eztent of Bepeal. The whole, as to the whole Uni- ted Kingdom. The whole. The whole. Sections twenty- three, twenty- f o u r, and twenty five. The whole, as to the whole Uni- ted Kingdom. The whole. The whole. The whole, ex- cept section twenty .one. The whole. The whole, as to the whole Uni- ted Kingdom. Section sixteen. The whole. The whole. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 95. 15 Beferences to Act. 4 & 5 5 & 6 Will. 4, c. 26 Will. 4, u. 34 (I.) 5 & 6 Will. 4, c. 81 ; 7 Will. 4, 0.4 6 & 7 Will. 4, O.30 6 & 7 WiU, 4, 0.86 7Will.4&lViot. 0.77 Title of Act. tion for life in oertain cases of forgery and in certain other cases. An Act to abolish the practice of hanging the bodies of criminals in chains. An Act to amend two clerical errors contained in an Act passed in the ninth year of the reign of his lute Majesty King George the Fourth, intituled "An Act for consolida- ting and amending the laws in Ire- land relative to larceny and other o£fences connected therewith. '' An Act for abolishing capital pun- ishments in cases of letter stealing and sacrilege. An Act to amend the Act of the last session for abolishing capital punishments in ca^es of letter stealing and sacrilege. An Act to repeal so much of two Acts of the ninth and tenth years of King George the Fourth as directs the period of the execution and the prison discipline of per- sons conyioted of the crime of murder. AnAct for registering births, deaths, and marriages in England. An Act to assimilate the practice of the Central Criminal Court to other courts of criminal judicature within the kingdom of .England Extent of Repeal. Section two. The whole. So much as re- lates to the pun- ishment of any person who shall break and en- ter any church or chapel, and steal therein any chattel, or having stolen any chattel in any church or chapel shall break out of the same, and to principals in the second degree and accessories in such offences. So much as al- ters and amends that part of the 5 & 6 Will. 4, c. 81, which is hereby repealed. The' whole. Section forty.- three. So much of sec- tion three as empowers the court to direct 16 Criminal Statutes Repeal Act, Beterences to Act. Title pf Act Extent of Bepeol. 7WiU.4&lViot c. 84 7Wm.4&lViot. c. 85 7Wai.4&lVict. 0.86 7WiU.4&lViot. c. 87 7Will.4&lViot. e. 89 and Wales with respect to offen- ders liable tp tb@ punishment of death. An Act to abolish the punishment of death in cases of forgery. Au Act to amend the laws relating to offences against the person. An Act to amend the laws relating to burglary and stealing in a dwelling house. An Act to amend the laws relating to robbery and stealing from the person. An Act to amend the laws relating to burning or destroying buildings and ships. sentence of death to be re- corded in cases of murder. So much of sec- tions one and three as relates to the forging, altering, offer- ing, uttering, disposing of, or putting off any will, testament, codicil, or testa- mentary writ- ing, or any power of attor- ney, or other authority there- in mentioned, and to princi- pals in the second degree and accessories before the fact in such offences, and so much of sections two and three as relates to the punishment of any offence created by or formerly pun- ishable under any enactment in this schedule before men- tioned and here- by repealed. The whole. The whole. The whole. The whole. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 95. 17 Beferencea to A.ct. Title of Act Extent of Bepeal. 7WiU.4&lVict. C.90 2 & 3 Vict «. 58 3 & 4 Vict 0. 97 4 (S 5 Viot. c. 66 5 & 6 Vict. c. : ao 5 & 6 Vict. c. Ad Act to amend the kw relating to offences punishable by transporta- tion for life. An Act to make further provision for the administration of justice, and for improving the practice and proceedings in the Courts of the Stannaries of Cornwall, and for the prevention of frauds by workmen employed in the mines within the county of Cornwall. An Act for regulating railways ... An Act for taking away the punish- ment of death in certain cases, and substituting other punishments in lieu thereof. An Act to assimilate the law in Ireland as to the punishment of death to the law in England ; to abolish the punishment of death in certain cases in Ii-eland, and to substitute other punishments in lieu thereof. An Act to amend thfi law relating to advances bond Jide made to agents intrusted with goods. The whole, ex- cept section five. Section ten. Section fifteen. Sections two and three, and so much of section one as relates to embezzlements by officers or servants of the Bank of England Sections four, thirteen, four- teen, andfifteen, and so much of section seven as alters the pun- ishment con- tained in any enactmenthere- by repealed, and so much of sec- tion eighteen as relates to prin- cipals in the second degree and accessories before the fact to any offence mentioned in tbesaid sections four, thirteen, fourteen and fifteen or in the said part of the said section eighteen hereby repealed. Section six. 18 Criminal Statutes Repeal Act, Beferences to Act 5 & 6 Viot. e. 66 5&6Vict.c. 106 (1) 6 & 7 Viot. c. 10 7 & 8 Viot. u. 62 7 & 8 Viot. c. 81 8 & 9 Viot. 0. 44 8 & 9 Viot. 0. 47 8 & 9 Viot. 0. 108 (I.) 9 & 10 Vict. C.25 10 & 11 Vict. 0.66 11 & 12 Viot 0.46 12 & 13 Viot. 0.11 12 & 13 Viot. 0.76 1? & 14 Vict. c. 72 (I.) 13 & 14 Viot. e.88(I.) Title of Act. An Aot for fuither regulating the preparation and issue of exchequer bills. An Act to regulate the Irish fisheries An Act for remoring doubts as to the punishment which may be awarded under the provisions of an Act of the fourth and fifth years of Her present Majesty, "for taking away the punishment of death in certain cases," for certain offences therein specified. An Act to amend the law as to burn- ing farm buildings. An Aot for marriages in Ireland, and for registering such marriages. An Aot for the better protection of works of art and scientific and literary produocions. An Aot for the further prevention of the offence of dog stealing. An Act for the further amendment of an Act of the sixth year of Her present Majesty for regulating the Irish fisheries. An Aot for preventing malicious in- juries to persons and property by fire or by explosive or destructive substances. An Act for extending the provisions of the law respecting threatening letters and accusing parties with a view to extort money. An Act for the removal of defects in the administration of criminal justice. An Aot to amend the laws of Eng- land and Ireland relative to larceny and other offences con- nected therewith. in Act to protect women from fraudulent practices for procuring their defilement. An Act to amend the laws for the registration of assurances of lands in Ireland. An Aot to amend the law relating to engines used in the rivers and on the sea-coasts of Ireland for the taking of fish. Extent of Bepeal Sections nine and ten. Sections eleven and twelve. The whole. The whole. Section seventy- five. The whole. The whole. Section eighteen The whole. The whole. Sections one, two, and three. The whole. The whole. Section sixty- two. Section forty- two. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 95. 19 Beferences to Act Title of Act Extent of Repeal. 14 & 15 Viot. 0.11 14 & 15 Viot. C.19 14 & 15 Vict. c. 92 (I.) 14 & 15 Vict c. 100 16 & 17 Vict. 0. ! An Act for the better protection of persons under the care and control of others as apprentices or ser- vants; and to enable the guardians and overseers of the poor to in- stitute and conduct prosecutions in certain cases. An Act for the better prevention of ofiences. An Act to consolidate and amend the Acts relating to certain offences and other matters, as to which justices of the peace exercise sum- mary jurisdiction in Ireland. An Act for further improving the administration of criminal justice. An Act for redeeming or commuting the annuity payable to the South Sea Company, and certain annui- ties of three pounds per centum per annum, and for creating new annuities of three pounds ten shillings per centum per annum, and two pounds ten shillings per centum per annum, and issuing exchequer bonds. Sections one, two, sis, and seven. Sections one, two, three, four, six, seven, eight, and nine. Sections two, three, four, and five. Sections four, six, eight, eleven, thirteen, fourteen, ' fif- teen, sixteen, seventeen, and so much of sec- tion five as re- lates to forging or uttering any instrumen t, and so much of section twenty- nine as relates to any indecent assault, or any assault occa- sioning actua,l bodily harm, or any* attempt to have carnal knowledge of a girl under twelve years of age. Section forty- one. 20 Criminal Statutes Repeal Act, BefereuceB to Act. Title at Act Extent of BepeaL 16 & 17 Viot. C.30 16 & 17 Viot. c. 99 16 & 17 Vict c. 102 16 & 17 Viot. 0.113 16 & 17 Viot. 6.132 17 & 18 Viot. 20 & 21 Vict. An Act for the better prevention and punishment of aggisivated assaults upon women and children, and for preventing delay and ex- pense in the administration of certain parts of the criminal law. An Act to substitute in certain cases other punishment in lieu of trans- portation. An Act to prevent the defacing of the current coin of the realm. An Act to amend the procedure in the Superior Courts of Common Law in Ireland. cbi An Act to extend the provisions of an Act of the present session for re- deeming or commuting the annuity payable to the South Sea Company and certain annuities of three pounds per centum per annum, and to provide for payments to be made under the said Act. An Act to place public statutes within theMetropolitan Police Dis- trict under the control of the Com- missioners of Her Majesty's Works and Public Buildings. An Act to make better provision for the punishment of frauds commit- ted by trustees, bankers, and other persons intrusted with property, Section one. Section twelve. The whole as to the whole United King- dom. So much of sec- tion seventy- one as relates to any action which shall be commenced against any person for any- thing done in pursuance of any of the acts of this session for consolidat- ing and amend- ing the statute law of England and Ireland relating to larceny, mali- cious injuries, and coin. Sections ten and eleven. Section sis. Xhe whole. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 95. ^1 Beferences to Act. Title of Act 21 & 22 Vict. c. 3 21 & 22 Vict. c. 47 21 & 22 Vict. c. 79 21 & 22 Vict.' o. 106 22 Vict. li. 11 22 & 23 Vict. c. 32 22 & 23 Vict. c. 39 Extent of Bepeal. An Act for enabling the East India Section ten. Company to raise money in the United Kingdom for the service of the Government of India. An Act to amend the law of false The whole. pretences. An Act to amend the law relating to Section three. cheques or drafts on bankers. An Act for the better government of Section fifty. India. An Act to enable the Secretary of Section ten. State in Connoil of India to raise mone;' in the United Kingdom for the service of the Qovernment of India. An Act to amend the law concerning Section twenty- the police in counties and boroughs five. in England and Wales. An Act to enable the Secretary of Section thirteen. State in Council of India to raise money in the United Kingdom for the service of the Government of India. An Act to amend the law relating The whole. to the unlawful administering of poison. 23 & 24 Vict. An Act to amend an Act relative to The whole. 0. 29 malicious injuries to property. 23 & 24 Viot. An Act to enable the Secretary of Section thirteen. 0. 130 State in Council of India to raise money in the United Kingdom for the service of the Government of India. 23 & 24 Vict. c. 8 22 III. LARCENY, &c. ACT. Interpreta- tion of terms " Document of Title to Goods." "Document of Title to Lands,'' 24 & 25 Vict. cap. 96. An Act to consolidate and amend the Statute Law of England and Ireland relating to Larceny and other similar Offences. — \Joth Av^ust, 1861.] Whbeeas it is expedient to consolidate and amend tlie statute law of England and Ireland relating to larceny and otter similar offences : Be it en- acted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the au- thority of the same, as follows : 1. In the interpretation of this act : The term "Document of Title to Goods " shall include any bill of lading, India warrant, dock warrant, warehouse keeper's certificate, war- rant or order for the delivery or transfer of any goods or valuable thing, bought and sold note, or any other document used in the ordinary course of business as proof of the possession or control of goods, or autho- rising or purporting to authorise, either by indorsement or Tjy delivery, the possessor of such document to transfer or receive any goods thereby represented or therein men- tioned or referred to : The term " Document of Title to Lands " shall include any deed, map, paper, or parchment, 24 ^ 25 Vict. mp. 96. 23 ■written or printed, or partly written and partly printed, being or containing evidence of the title, or any part of the title, to any real estate, or to any interest in or out of any real estate : The term " Trustee " shaU mean a trustee on " Trustee." some express trust created by some deed', will, or instrument in WTiting,(') and shall include the heir, or personal representative, of any such trustee, and any other person upon or to whom the duty of such trust shall have de- volved or come, and also an executor and administrator, and an oflScial manager, as- signee, liquidator, or other like ofiScer acting under any present or future act relating to joint-stock companies, bankruptcy, or insol- vency : The term "Valuable Security" shall include any g^*''?*'']? order, exchequer acquittance, or other security "" ^' whatsoever entitling or evidencing the title of any person or body corporate to any share or interest in any public stock or fund whether of the United Kingdom, or of Great Britain (') In Reg. v. Fletcher (9 Cox Crim. Cas. 189 ; Leigh & Cave 180 ; 31 L. J. M. 0. 206) it was held that the rules of a sayings bank were an " instrument in writing " within this section. In the above case the prisoner, who was trustee, treasurer, and secretary of a savings bank was indicted under the 20 & 21 Vict, c." 54, s. 1 (" An Act to make better Provision for the Punishment of Frauds committed by Trustees, Bankers, and other Persons entrusted with Property ") for misappro- priation as a trustee. As secretary he received the money deposited, which by the rules of the savings bank it was his duty to hand over to the treasurer, who was required by the Savings Bank Acts to pay it over when demanded to the trustees, whose duty, as defined by the rules, was to invest it in the public funds in the names of the Com- sioners for the Eeductlon of the National Debt. The prisoner falsified and appropriated to his own purposes part of the money so deposited with him as secretary with intent to defraud. It was held that he was a trustee of pi-cmerty for thebeneJU of some other person within the meaning of the last- mentioned section. 24 Lariemy, IfC, Act, or of Ireland, or of any foreign state, or in any fund of any body corporate, company, or society, wtetlier within the United Kingdom or in any foreign state or country, or to any deposit in any bank, and sball also include any debenture, deed, bond, bill, note, warrant, order, or other security whatsoever for money or for payment of money, whether of the United Kingdom, or of Great Britain, or of Ireland, or of any foreign state, and any document of title to lands or goods as herein- " P' opei ty." before defined : The term " Property " shall include every description of real and personal property, money, debts, and legacies, and all deeds and instruments relating to or evidencing the title or right to any property, or giving a right to recover or receive any money or goods, and shall also include, not only such property as shaU have been originally in the possession or under the control of any party, but also any property into or for which the same may have been converted or exchanged, and anything acquired by such conversion or exchange, "Night" whether immediately , or otherwise : For the purposes of this act, the night shall be deemed to commence at nine of the clock in the evening of each day, and to conclude at six of the clock in the morning of the next succeeding day. All larcenies 2. Every larceny, whatever be the value of the same nature, property stolen, shall be deemed to be of the same nature, and shall be subject to the same incidents in all respects as grand larceny was before the twenty-first day of June one thousand eight hundred and twenty-seven ; and every court whose power as to the trial of larceny was before that time limited to petty larceny shall have power to try every case of larceny, the punish- U 4- 25 Vict. cap. 96. 25 ment of wliioli cannot exceed tte punishment hereinafter mentioned for simple larceny, and also to try all accessories to such larceny. (^) Continuous Act. — By means of a secret junction pipe with the main, a mill was supplied with gas which did not pass through the metre, and which was consumed without being paid for. This continued to be done for some years. Held, on an indictment for stealing 1000 cubic feet of gaa, that the entire evidence might be given, as there was one continuous act of stealing all the time : (Beg. v. MHh, 19 L. T. Eep. 746 ; Law Bep. 1 0. C. Ees. 172.) St'mlinff from a large quantity. — Prisoner was found with dead fowls in his posseeeioo, of which he could give no aceount, and was tracked to a fowl-house where a number of fowls were kept, and on the floor of which were some feathers corresponding with the feathers of one of the fowls on the prisoner, from the neck of which feathers had been removed. The fowl-house, which was closed over night, was found open in the morning. The spot where the prisoner was found was 1200 yards from the fowl-house, and the prosecutor, not knowing the number of fowls kept, could not swear that he had lost any. Held, that there was evidence to support a conviction for larceny : (Reg. v. Mockfard, 17 L. T. Bep. 582.) Influence of a threat — Mock auction. — A woman went into a mock auction-room, where the prisoner pretended to act as auctioneer. Some cloth was put up by auction, for which a person in the room bid 25s. A man standing between the woman and the door said to the prisoner that she had bid 26s. for it, upon which the prisoner knocked it down to the woman. She said she had not bid for it, and would not pay for it, and tamed to go out. The prisoner said she must pay for it before she would be allowed to go out, and she was prevented from going out. She then paid 26s. to the prisoner because she was afraid, and left with the cloth. Held, that these facts were sufficient to sustain a conviction for larceny : (Reg. v. MacGrath, 21 L. T. Eep. 543; 29 L. J. M. 0. 7.) Recent ■ possession— Presumption. — It is a presumption of fact, arid not an Implication of law from evidence of recent possession of stolen property unaccounted for, whether the offence of stealing or of feloniously receiving has been com- mitted. Where an indictment contains counts for larceny and receiving, unless the evidence excludes the probability of one or the other offence having been committed, the case should be left to the jury on both counts : (Sea. v. Langmead, 10 L. T. Eep. 350.) Toimg partridges. — Toung partridges were reared from eggs by a common hen ; they could fly a little, but still remained with the hen as her brood, and slept under her wings at night, and from their inability to escape were practically in the power and dominion of the prosecutor : 26 Larceny, ^c. Act, BaUees 3.(') Whosoever being a bailee of any chattel, ooflTOrtiJg^ money or valuable security, shaU fraudulently Held, that they might be the subject of larceny : (/fe^. v. aUekU, 19 L. T. Eep. 327; Law Eep. 1 0. C. Ees. 158.) Lost Properly. — A. dropped a sovereign on a country road during the night time. She did not stop to look for it, but on the following morning she started to go to the spot in the hope of finding It. In the meantime the prisoner picked it up, and said to his companion, " It would just make his week up." Prisoner and his companion walked on and met A. on her way to the spot where she lost the sovereign. From what passed between A. and the prisoner and his companion, the fact that the prisoner had got A.'s sovereign was brought to the prisoner's knowledge; but he denied having found it. Subsequently he was taxed with having done so, but he would not admit it, equivocated, and declined to give it up. Held, on the authority of TkurhorjCs case, that the prisoner could not be convicted of larceny, as at the time the prisoner picked up the sovereign, intending to appropriate it to his own use, he did not kuow, and had not the means of knowing,' who the owner was : (^Reg. v. Glyde, 18 L. T. Eep. 613; Law Eep. 1 0. 0. Ees. 139.) Finding — Withholding in hope of a reward. — One who in expectation of a reward withholds from the owner whom he knows a lost cheque received by him from the finder is not guilty of stealing the cheque : (Reg. v. Gardner, 7 L. T. Eep. 471; 32 L. J. M. C. 35.) Larceny by an adulterer — Evidence of possession. — The prisoner, a servant of the prosecutor, eloped with the pro- secutor's wife, and was found living with the wife in a room which they had occupied for two days. Some of the husband's property was found in a box belonging to the husband, locked, and of which the wife had the key, but a watch belonging to him was being worn by the prisoner. ■When taken, he said that the watch was the -wife's, and that he had got it from her. Held, that upon this evidence, the jury were justified in convicting the prisoner of lar- ceny : (Beg v. Mutters, 11 L. T. Eep. 642 ; 34 L. J. M. C. 64. Attempt to commit a larceny. — In order to convict of an attempt to commit larceny, it must appear that there was property in the place where the attempt is made that could be stolen. Therefore, where a person put his hand into the pocket of another, with intent to steal, he cannot be con- victed of an attempt to steal unless it appear that there was property in the pocket which might be stolen. It should be left to the jury to say whether there was any pro- perty in the pocket : (Reg. v. Collins, 10 L. T. Eec. 681 : 33 L. J. M. 0. 177.) " ' (3) Very many decisions having been pronounced upon this section and the corresponding section in the repealed statute of the 20 & 21 'Vict. o. 64, s. 4, it will bo well here to refer to them. 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 96. 27 take or convert the same to his own use or the property use of any person other than the owner thereof, faroony.' although he shall not break bulk or otherwise determine the bailment, shall be guilty of larceny, and may be convicted thereof upon an indictment for larceny ; but this section shall not extend to any offence punishable on summary conviction. 4.(*) Whosoever shall be convicted of simple Panishmont larceny, or of any felony hereby made punishable laroe^f'* A man caunotbe convicted of larceny aa bailee, unless the bailment was to redeliver the very same chattel or money : (Reg. V. Soare, 1 Foa. & Pin. 647 ; Reg. v. Garrett, 2 Foe. & Fiu. 140 In Reg. v. BasseU (Leigh & Oave, 58) Cock- burn, 0. J., said : "The prisoner is indicted under the 4th section of the 20 & 21 Vict. c. 64, for larceny as a bailee. The word ' bailment' must there be understood in its legal ac- ceptation, namely, a deposit of something to be returned in specie, and does not apply to the receipt of money with an obligation to return the amount where there is no obligation to return the identical coin." To sustain a charge of larceny by a bailee it ia necessary to prove some act of conversion inconsistent with the pur- poses of the bailment ; where, therefore, the prisoner was indicted for larceny as the bailee of a coat, and the evidence was that the prosecutor had lent the coat to the prisoner to wear for a day, and that some few days afterwards the prisoner left the town and was found wearing the coat on board a vessel bound for Australia, Martin, B., stopped the case on the ground that there was no evidence of a conversion sufficient to satisfy the statute, aaying, "the determination of the bailment must be something analogous to larceny, and some act must be done inconsistent with the purposes of the bailment :" (Reg. v. Jackson, 9 Cox Orim. Oas. 505.) See, also, Regy. Weelee (10 Cox Orim. Cas. 224.) In Reg. v. BuckneU (9 Cox Crim. Cas. 778) and Reg. v. Bunhdl (Leigh & Cave, 371), the prisoner was entrusted by the prosecutor with money to buy a load of coals, which were to be brought to the prosecutor by the prisoner in his own cart, the prisoner being paid for his services, including the use of his horse and cart. He bought a load of coal in his own name, and on the way to the prosecutor's he abstracted a portion of the coal and converted it to hia own use, delivering the rest of the coal .to the prosecutor as and for the whole load. This was held to constitute the offence .of larceny by a bailee. (*) By sect. 2 of the 27 & 28 Vict. o. 47 (aee the atatute, post)., five years' penal aervitude is in all cases substituted aa the minimum sentence in lieu of three years. Solitary confinemeM. — By sect. 119 of the present statute it is enacted, that "whenever solitary confinement may o2 28 Larceny, ^c. Act, like simple larceny, shall (except in the cases here- inafter otherwise provided for) be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for the te»m of three years, or to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Three lar- 5.(') It shall be lawful to insert several counts ^thin six ™ ^^® Same indictment against the same person months may for any number of distinct acts of stealing, not in one ta- excpeding three, which may have been committed diotment. \,y jjim against the same person within the space of six months, from the first to the last of such acts, and to proceed thereon for all or any of them. Where a 6. If upon the trial of any indictment for single taldng larceny it shall appear that the property alleged and several in such indictment to have been stolen at one be awarded for any indictable offence under this act, the court may direct the offender to be kept in solitary confine- ment for any portion or portions of his imprisonment, or of his imprisonment with hard labour, not exceeding one month at any one time, and not exceeding three months in any one year." Wkijfpiag. — By sect. 119 of the present statute it is enacted, that " whenever whipping may be awarded for any indictable offence under this act, the court may sentence the offender to be once privately whipped, and the number of strokes, and the instrument with which they shall be inflicted, shall be specified by the court in the sentence." The 26 & 27 Vict. o. 103 (" An Act to amend the Law in cei-tain Oases of Misappropriation by Servants of the Pro- perty of their Masters ") makes important alterations in the cases of servants, contrary to the orders of their masters, taking from the possession of such masters food for the purpose of giving the same to any horse or other animal belonging to or in the possession of their masters. See the statute CposO- (5) Indictment far three larcenies. — An indictment against a prisoner for three larcenies from the same prosecutor con- tained no averment that they were committed within a period of six months. Held, nevertheless, that the indictment was good : iBeg v. Eeywood, 10 L. T. Bep. 464; 33 L. J. M. 0. 133.) 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 29 time was taken at different times, the prosecutor taWnga at shall not by reason thereof, be required to elect ameB™re upon which taking he will proceed, unless it shall proved, appear that there were more than three takings, or that more than the space of six months elapsed between the first and the last of such takings ; and in either of such last-mentioned case's the prosecutor shall be required to elect to proceed for such number of takings, not exceeding three, as appear to have taken place within the period of six months from the first to the last of such takings. 7.(^) Whosoever shall commit the offence of Larceny, T 1 (. , . ■ i. • J after a smaple larceny alter a previous connction for conviction felony, whether such conviction shall have taken '"^ '^lo^y- place upon an indictment, or under the provisions of the act passed in the session held in the eighteenth and nineteenth years of Queen Vic- toria, chapter one hundred and twenty-six, shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceed- ing ten years, and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. S.C) Whosoever shall commit the offence of Larceny, simple larceny, or any orfence hereby made C) This section is a modification of sect. 11 of the 7 & 8 Geo. 4, c. 28, which provides for the punishment of offenders who commit felonies after a previous conviction for felony. The present enactment, it will be observed, is confined to the case of the commission of simple larceny after a previous conviction for felony ; so that should the subse- quent offence not be one of simple larceny, it cannot be dealt with under this section. (The 7 & 8 Geo. 4, c. 28, is not repealed.) See, as to penal servitude after a previous conviction, 27 & 28 Vict. c. 47 (post). (') Under the 7 & 8 Geo. 4, c. 28, s. 11, to warrant the charge of a previous conviction, such conviction must be after 30 Larceny, ^c. Act, of an punishable like simple larceny, after having been misdemea- previously convicted of any indictable misde- ?his ao*^'' ™^^'^or punishable under this act, shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Larceny, 9. Whosoever shall commit the offence of summary simple larceny, or any offence hereby made convictions, punishable like simple larceny, after having been twice summarily convicted of any of the offences punishable upon summary conviction, under the provisions contained in the act of the session held 7 fe 8 Geo. 4, in the seventh and eighth years of King George c.-. 29, 30. ^j^g Fourth, chapter twenty-nine, or the act of the same sessitin, chapter thirty, or the act of 9 Geo. 4, CO. the ninth year of King George the Fourth, 85, so. chapter flfty-flve, or the act of the same year, chapter fifty-six, or the act of the session held in 10 & 11 Vict the tenth and eleventh years of Queen Victoria, •=■ *^- chapter eighty-two, or the act of the session held 11 ft 12 Vict in the eleventh and twelfth years of Queen Vic- "■ ■ toria, chapter fifty-nine, or in sections three, four, five, and six of the act of the session held in the H sl 15 Vict, fourteenth and fifteenth years of Queen Victoria, 0.92. of some Jdami; the present section, however, renders this unnecessary, since the previous crime may now have been any indictable misdemeanor punishable under this act. It is remarkable that, whilst the Legislature were altering this head of the law, they did not extend the operation of these two last sections to certain misdemeanors committed after a previous conviction. Take, for instance, the misdemeanor of obtaining property by false pretences — that is an offence which may be punished by five years' penal servitude — and there seems no good reason why, upon a subsequent conviction for a similar offence, it should not be put upon the same footing as a larceny, and the offender be subject to seven years' penal servitude. 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 96. 81 chapter ninety-two, or in tliis act, or the act of this session, intituled " An Act to consolidate 24 & 25 viot. and amend the Statute Law of England and "• ''■ Ireland relating to malicious Injuries to Property " (whether each of the convictions shall have been in respect of an offence of the same description or not, and whether such convictions or either of them shall have been or shaU be before or after the passing of this act), shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for any term not exceeding seven years, and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. As to larceny of cattle or other animals : 10. Whosoever shall steal any horse, mare, stealing gelding, colt, or filly, or any buU, cow, ox, heifer, g^™^'^'"' or calf, or any ram, ewe, sheep, or lamb, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years, and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. ll.(*) Whosoever shall wilfully kiU any animal, KUiing auluials (8) Thia ia in substance a re-enactment of sect. 25 of the 7 & 8 Geo. 4, c. 29, so far as it relates to the wilfully killing of any of the cattle mentioned in the said section, with intent to steal the carcase, &c. ; the words, however, are more general in the present section, comprising any anhnalf with this proviso, that the offence of stealing the animal so killed would have amounted to felony. This proviso exempts from the operation of the section the killing of a dog for the pm'poaes before mentioned, since, by sect. 18, the stealing of a dog (second offence) is not a felony, but a misdemeanor. 32 Larceny, Sro. Act, with mtent to steal the earcase, &c Stealing deer in an uniucIOBed part or a crest. ■with intent to steal the carcase, skin, or any part of the animal so killed, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to the same punishment' as if he had been convicted of feloniously stealing the same, provided the offence of stealing the animal so kilUed would have amounted to felony. 12.(8) 'Whosoever shall unlawfully and wilfully course, hunt, snare, or carry away, or kill or wound, or attempt to kiU or wound, any deer kept or being in the uninclosed part of any forest, chase, or purlieu, shall for every such offence, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, forfeit and pay such sum, not exceeding fifty pounds, as to the justice shall seem meet ; and whosoever having been previously convicted of any offence relating to deer, for which a pecuniary penalty shall have been imposed by this or by any former act of Parliament, shall afterwards commit any of the offences hereinbefore enumerated, whether such second offence be of the same de- scription as the first or not, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of six- teen years, with or without whipping. stealing 13- Whosoever shall unlawfully and wiKully deerin^any course, hunt, snare, or carry away, or kill or ground. wound, or attempt to kill or wound, any deer kept or being in the inclosed part of any forest, chase, or puxUeu, or in any inclosed land where deer shall be usually kept, shaU be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be Second offence. (») For the mode of prooeeding against any offender under this seotiou, the application of the penalty, the right of appeal, &o., see sects. 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, IIU, 112, and 120 (posf). 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 33 liable, at the discretion of the court, to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, ■with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 14. If any deer, or the head, skin, or other Snapeoted part thereof, or any snare or engine for the fo^din taking of deer, shall be found in the possession possession c ,1 . „ ^ ofvemson, 01 any person or on the premises oi any person &o , and not with his knowledge, and such person being taken, toriiy°'ai or summoned before a justice of the peace, shall counting for not satisfy the justice that he came lawfvjly by ' ' such deer, or the head, skin, or other part thereof, or had a lawful occasion for such snare or engine, and did not keep the same for any unlawful purpose, he shall, on conviction by the justice, forfeit and pay any sum not exceeding twenty Penalty pounds ; and if any such person shall not under j." "^^j ^^^ the said provisions be liable to conviction, then, convicted, for the discovery of the party who actually killed jMttce may or stole such deer, the justice, at his discretion, as proceed, the evidence given and the circumstances of the case shall require, may summon before him every per- son through whose hands such deer, or the head, skin, or other part thereof, shall appear to have passed ; and if the person from whom the same shall have been first received, or who shall have had possession thereof, shall not satisfy the justice that he came lawfully by the same, he shall, on conviction by the justice, be liable to the payment of such sum of money as hereinbefore last mentioned. 15. Whosoever shall unlawfully and wilfully setting set or use any snare or engine whatsoever, for the t^]§"f^eer purpose of taking or killing deer, in any part of or pulling any forest, chase, or purlieu, whether such part fenles!'"'' ^ be inclosed or not, or in any fence or bank dividing the same from any land adjoining, or in any ipolosed land where deer shall be usually kept, or shall unlawfully and wiKuUy destroy any c3 34 Larceny, ^c. Act, part of tte fence of any land wliere any deer shall be tlien kept, shall, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, forfeit and pay such sum of money, not exceeding twenty pounds, as to the justice shall seem meet. Deer 1 6. If any person shall enter into any forest, may seize"'' chase, or purlieu, whether inclosed or not, or into the {runs,&c., any inclosed lane where deer shall be usually kept, who, on with intent unlawfully to hunt, course, wound, ''Tdl* ' ^° ^•^' soare, or carry away any deer, every person up the same, intrusted with the care of such deer, and any of his assistants, whether in his presence or not, may demand from every such offender any gun, fire- arms, snare, or engine in his possession, and any dog there brought for hunting, coursing, or killing deer, and in case such offender shall not imme- diately deliver up the same, may seize and take the same from him in any of those respective places, or, upon pursuit made, in any other place to which he may have escaped therefrom for the Penalty on use of the Owner of the deer; and if any such tolieeDere offender shall unlawfully beat or wound any &o.,in the person intrusted with the care of the deer, or any theiTdu^. of liis assistants, in the execution of any of the powers given by this act, every such offender shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding, two years, with or without hard labom-, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Killing, te, IT-C") Whosoever shall unlawfully and wilfully, robbitsina between the expiration of the first hour after (1") This section is open to the objection that it does not direct what punishment is to be awarded for the offence of killing, &c, hares and rabbits in the night time. The old common law punishment, therefore, of fine or imprison- ment would seem to be the appropriate punishment. 24 ^ 25 , Vict. cap. 96. 35 sunset and tlie beginning of the last hour before warren in sunrise, take or kill any hare or rabbit in any ump°'*" warren or ground lawfully used for the breeding or keeping of hares or rabbits, whether the same be inclosed or not, shall be guilty of a misde- meanor ; and whosoever shaU unlawfully and wil- fully, between the beginning of the last hour The like in before sunrise and the expiration of the first hour '''^ ''"y'lms- after sunset, take or kill any hare or rabbit in any such warren or ground, or shaU. at any time set or use therein any snare or engine for the taking of hares or rabbits, shall, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, forfeit and pay such sum of money, not exceeding five pounds, as to the justice shall seem meet ; provided that nothing in this Exceptioo. section contained shall affect any person taking or killing in the daytime any rabbits on any sea bank or river bank in the coimty of Lincoln, so far as the tide shall extend, or within one furlong of such bank. 18. Whosoever shall steal any dog shall, on stealing conviction thereof before two justices of the peace, ^°^^- either be committed to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be imprisoned, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour, for any term not exceeding six months, or shall forfeit and pay, over and above the value of the said dog, such sum of money not exceeding twenty pounds, as to the said justices shall seem meet ; and whosoever, second having been convicted of any such offence, either ''"™<=^- against this or any former act of Parliament, shall afterwards steal any dog, shall be guilty of a mis- demeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding eighteen months, without or without hard labour. 19. Whosoever shall unlawfully have in his Poesession possession or on his premises any stolen dog, dogs. '*" or the skin of any stolen dog, knowing such dog 36 Larceny, ifc. Act, Second offeace. Taking money to restore dogs. Stealing beaBtfl or birds ordi- Darily kept io conflne- ment, and not the subjects of larceny. Second offence. to have been stolen or such skin to be the skin of a stolen dog, shall, on conviction thereof between two justices of the peace, be liable to pay such sum of money, not exceeding twenty pounds, as to such justices shall seem meet; and whosoever, having been convicted of any such offence, either against this or any former act of Parliament, shall afterwards be guilty of any such offence as in this section before mentioned, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding eighteen months, with or without hard labour. 20. Whosoever shall corruptly take any money or reward, directly or indirectly, under pretence or upon account of aiding any person to recover any dog which shall have been stolen, or which shall be in the possession of any person not being the owner thereof, shall be guilty of a misde- meanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding eighteen months, with or without hard labour. 21. Whosoever shall steal any bird, beast, or other animal ordinarily kept in a state of con- finement or for any domestic purpose, not being the subject of larceny at common law, or shall wilfuUy kill any such bird, beast, or animal, with intent to steal the same or any part thereof, shall on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, at the discretion of the justice, either be com- mitted to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be imprisoned only, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour for any term not exceed- ing six months, or else shall forfeit and pay, over and above the value of the bird, beast, or other animal, such sum of money not exceeding twenty pounds, as to the justice shall seem meet ; and whosoever, having been convicted of any such 24 4- '26 Vict. cap. 96. 37 offence, either against tMs or any former act of Parliament, shall afterwards commit any offence in this section before mentioned, and shall be convicted thereof in like manner, shall be com- mitted to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be kept to hard labour for such term not exceeding twelve months as the convicting justice shaU think fit. 22. If any such bird, or any of the plumage Persona thereof, or any dog, or any such beast, or the skin po"8eaa?on thereof, or any such animal or any part thereof, of stolen shall be found in the possession or on the pre- Sf'to"" mises of any person, any justice may restore the Penalties, same respectively to the owner thereof ; and any person in whose possession or on whose premises such bird or the plumage thereof, or such beast or the skin thereof, or such animal or any part thereof, shall be so found (such person knowing that the bird, beast, or animal has been stolen or that the plumage is the plumage of a stolen bird, or that the skin is the skin of a stolen beast, or that the part is the part of a stolen animal), shall, on conviction before a justice of the peace, be liable for the first offence to such forfeiture, and for every subsequent offence to such punishment, as any person convicted of stealing any beast or bird is made liable to by the last preceding section. 23. (^') Whosoever shall unlawfully and wilfully Killing kill, wound, or take any hou;3 dove or pigeon P'^eons. under such circumstances as shall not amount to larceny at common law, 3hall, on conviction before a justice of the peace, foi-feit and pay, over and above the value of the bird, anj' sum not exceed- ing two pounds. (") This provision does not apply to a case where a party under a claim of right kills a pigeon which is doinp: tnia- ehiet upon his property : (Taylor v. Newmxtn. 8 L. T. Eep. 424; 32 L. J. M. 0. 186; 9 Cox Onm. Gas. 314.) 38 Larceny, ^c. Act, TabiDg fish in any water situate in laud belong- ing to a dwelling house ; in a private fishery elsewhere. Provision respecting anglers. 24.(^2) Whosoever shall unlawfully and wilfully take or destroy any fish in any water which shall run through or be in any land adjoining or belonging to the dwelling house of any person being the owner of such water, or having a right of fishery therein, shall be guilty of a mis- demeanor ; and whosoever shall unlawfully and wilfully take or destroy, or attempt to take or destroy, any fish in any water not being such as hereinbefore mentioned, but which shall be private property, or in which there shall be any private right of flshery,(^') shall, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, forfeit and pay, over and above the value of the fish taken or destroyed (if any), such sum of money not exceeding five pounds, as to the justice shall seem meet : provided that nothing hereinbefore contained shall extend to any person angling between the beginning of the last hour before sunrise and the expiration of the first hour after sunset ; but whosoever shall by angling between the beginning of the last hour before sunrise and the expiration of the first hour after sunset unlawfully and wilfully take or destroy, or attempt to take or destroy, any fish in any such water as first (•2) This section is open to the objection that it does not define the punishment for the misdemianor enacted in the lirst portion of the section; the offence therefore will be punishable as a misdemeanor at common law by fine and imprisonment or either. (13) When upon the hearing by justices of an information, a claim of right is set up by the defendant, such claim, if made horn fide, and with some show of reason, will oust their jurisdiction ; and although it is for the justices to determine whether or not such claim of right is made bona fide, and with a show of reason, yet if they deter- mine that it is not so made, the Court of Queen's Bench will review their determination, and overrule it if come to upon insufScient grounds: (^Reg. v. Stimpson and Peak, 8 L. T. Eep. 526; 32 L. J. M. C. 2l)8.) If, however, a claim of right is set up which cannot exist in law, then, notwith- standing it is made band, fide, the justices should disregard it: (HvAirni v. M'Bea, 33 h. J. M. C. 65 ; 9 L. T. Bep. 678.) 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 96. 39 mentioned, sliall, on oonviotion before a justice of the peace, forfeit and pay any sum not exceeding five pounds, and if in any such water as last mentioned, he shall, on the like conviction, forfeit and pay any sum not exceeding two pounds as to the justice shall seem meet ; and if the boundary of an}' parish, township, or vill shall happen to be in or by the side of any such water as is in this section before mentioned, it shall be sufficient to prove that the offence was committed either ProviBion as in the parish, township, or vill named in the aarie" or indictment or information, or in any parish, town- parishes ship, or vill, or adjoining thereto. 25. If any person shall at any time be found The taoide fishing against the provisions of this act, the may be owner of the ground, water, or fishery where seized, such offender shall be so found, his servant or any person authorised by him, may demand from such offender any rod, line, hook, net, or other implement for taking or destroying fish which shall then be in his possession, and in case such offender shall not immediately deliver up the same, may seize and take the same from him for the use of such owner : provided, that any person Angler, on angUng against the provisions of this act, between h°ftaoitie, the beginning of the last hour before sunrise and exempt from the expiration of the first hour after sunset, from whom any implement used by anglers shall be taken, or by whom the same shall be so delivered up, shall by the taking or delivering thereof be exempted from the pa3rment of any damages or penalty for such angling. 26. Whosoever shall steal any oysters or oyster stealing or brood from any oyster bed, laying, or fishery, oyste^rfn ""^ being the property of any other person, and oyster sufficiently marked out or known as such, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be punished as in the case of simple larceny ; and whosoever shall unlawfully 40 Larceny, ^c. Act, and wilfully use any dredge, or any net, instru- ment, or engine whatsoever, wittin the limits of any oyster bed, laying, or fishery, being the property of any other person, and sufficiently marked out or known as such, for the purpose of taking oysters or oyster brood, although none shall be actually taken, or shall unlawfully and wilfully, with any net, instrument, or engine, drag upon the ground or soil of any such fishery, shaU be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding three months, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement ; and it shall be sufficient in any indictment to describe either by name or otherwise the bed, laying, or fishery in which any of the said offences shall have been committed, without stating the same to be in any particular parish, township, or vill : provided, that nothing in this section con- tained shall prevent any person from catching or fishing for any floating fish within the limits of any oyster fishery with any net, instrument, or engine adapted for taking floating fish only. As to larceny of written instruments : Bonds, bill 27.C'') Whosoever shall steal, or shall for any notes, &c. fraudulent purpose destroy, cancel, or obliterate, CO In Reg. v. Lowrie, (36 L. J. M. C. 24; 10 Cox Ciim. Cas. 388) the prisoner was convicted on an indictment under this section for stealing a " certain valuable security, to wit, an agreement between L. and C. whereby 0. was entitled to receive payment of certain sums of money, and which said suras of money were then due and unsa'tisiied to C." It was proved that the sums were not due till some tinie after the stealing. Dpon this it was held that since this section limits the terra " valuable security " to securities " other than a document of title to lands," it is material in an indictment under this section to describe the valuable security, so as to show that it is within the section, and that the description ought to have been proved, and that since it had not been proved, the conviction could not be supported. Form of indictment Proviso as to floating fish. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 41 the whole or any part of any valuable security, other than a document of title to lands, shall be guilty of felony, of the same nature and in the same degree and punishable in the same manner as if he had stolen any chattel of like value with the share, interest, or deposit to which the security so stolen may relate, or with the money due on the securities so stolen, or secured thereby and remaining unsatisfied, or with the value of the goods or other valuable thing represented, men- tioned, or referred to in or by the security. 28. Whosoever shall steal, or shall for any Deeds, &c. fraudulent purpose destroy, cancel, obliterate, or ™i^"°s '° conceal, the whole or any part of any document perty. of title to lands shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement ; and in any indictment for pdnn of any such offence relating to any document of title indictment, to lands, it shall be sufficient to allege such docu- ment to be or to contain evidence of the title or of part of the title of the person or of some one of the persons having an interest, whether vested or contingent, legal or equitable, in the real estate to which the same relates, and to mention such real estate or some part thereof. 29. Whosoever shall, either during the life of wiiia or the testator or after his death, steal, or for any ""^'oiis. fraudulent purpose destroy, cancel, obliterate, or conceal, the whole or any part of any will, codicil, or other testamentary instrument, whether the same shall relate to real or personal estate, or to both, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years — or to be 42 Larceny, ^c. Act, other remo* dies not to be affected^ Stealing records or! other legal documentB imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement ; and it shall not in any indictment for such offence be necessary to allege that such wiU, codicil, or other instrument is the property of any person : provided, that nothing in this or the last preceding section mentioned, nor any proceeding, conviction, or judgment to be had or taken thereupon, shall prevent, lessen, or impeach any remedy at law or in equity which any party aggrieved by any such offence might or would have had if this act had not been passed ; but no conviction of any such offender shall be received in evidence in any action at law or suit in equity against him ; and no person shall be liable to be convicted of any of the felonies in. this and the last preceding section mentioned, by any evidence whatever, in respect of any act done by him, if he shall at any time previous to his being charged with such offence have first dis- closed such act, on oath, in consequence of any compulsory process of any court of law or equity in any action, suit, or proceeding which shall have been Sows fide instituted by any party aggrieved, or if he shall have first disclosed the same in any compulsory examination or deposition before any court upon the hearing of any matter in bankruptcy or insolvency. 30. Whosoever shall steal, or shall for any fraudulent purpose take from its place of deposit for the time being, or from any person having the lawful custody thereof, or shall unlawfully and maliciously cancel, obliterate, injure, or destroy the whole or any part of any record, writ, return, panel, process, interrogatory, deposition, aiSdavit, rule, order, or warrant of attorney, or of any original document whatsoever of or belonging to any court of record, or relating to any matter, civU or criminal, begun, depending, 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 43 or terminated in any such court, or of any bill, petition, answer, interrogatory, deposition, affi- davit, order, or decree, or of any original docu- ment whatsoever of or belonging to any court of equity, or relating to any cause or matter begun, depending or terminated in any such court, or of any original document in anywise relating to the business of any office or employment under Her Majesty, and being or remaining in any office appertaining to any court of justice, or in any of Her Majesty's castles, palaces, or houses, or in any Government or public office, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or Form of without solitary confinement ; and it shall not in '°*'°'"'™'- any indictment for such offence be necessary to allege that the article in respect of which the offence is committed is the property of any person. As to larceny of things attached to or grow- ing on land : 31. Whosoever shall steal, or shall rip, cut, Motai, glass, sever, or break with intent to steal, any glass or fljtea'to ' woodwork belonging to any building whatso- {^^|« <"■ ever, or any lead, iron, copper, brass, or other metal, or any utensil or fixture, whether made of metal or other material or of both, respectively fixed in or to any building whatsoever, or any thing made of metal fixed in any land being private property, or for a fence to any dwelling house, garden, or area, or in any square or street, or in any place dedicated to public use or orna- ment, or in any burial ground, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be punished as in the case of simple larceny ; and in the case of any such thing fixed in any such square, street, or place as aforesaid, it shall 44 Larceny, ^c. Act, not be necessary to allege the same to be the pro- perty of any person. Trees in 32. Whosoever shall steal, or shall cut, break, ''roundBof ''°°* ^P' '^^ Otherwise destroy or damage with the value of intent to steal, the whole or any part of any where of ae tree, sapling, or shrub, or any underwood, re- value of 6i speotively growing in any park, pleasure ground, garden, orchard, or avenue, or in any ground adjoining or belonging to any dwelling house, shall (in case the value of the article or articles stolen, or the amount of the injury done, shall exceed the sum of one pound) be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be punished as in the case of simple larceny ; and whosoever shaU steal, or shall out, break, root up, or otherwise destroy or damage with intent to steal, the whole or any part of any tree, sapling, or shrub, or any underwood, respectively growing elsewhere than in any of the situations in this section before mentioned, shall (in case the value of the article or articles stolen, or the amount of the injury done, shall exceed the sum of five pounds), be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be punished as in the case of simple larceny. stealing ^^- Whosoever shall steal, or shall cut, break, trees, root up, or otherwise destroy or damage with wheresoeyer intent to steal, the whole or any part of any of a^y vXe t'^®' sapUng, Or shrub, or any underwood, where- aboyeis., soever the same may be respectively growing, on°ummary the stealing of such article or articles, or the oo"™''"", injury done, being to the amount of a shilling at second the least, shall, on conviction thereof before a third°^' justice of the peace, forfeit and pay, over and offence, above the value of the article or articles stolen, °''°^' or the amount of the injury done, such sum. of money not exceeding five pounds as to the Second justice shall seem meet ; and whosoever having offence. been convicted of any such offence, either against 24 4' 25 Vict. cap. 96. 45 ttis or any former act of Parliament, shall after- wards commit any of the said offences in this section before mentioned, and shall be convicted thereof in like manner, shall for such second offence be committed to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be kept to hard labour for such term not exceeding twelve months as the convicting justice shall think fit ; and whosoever, having been twice convicted of Third any such offence (whether both or either of such "ff^ioa- convictions shall have taken place before or after the passing of this act), shall afterwards commit any of the offences in this section before mentioned, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be punished in the same manner as in the case of simple larceny. 34. Whosoever shall steal, or shall cut, break, stealing, &o., or throw down with intent to steal, any part of d°ad'feno6 any live or dead fence, or any wooden post, pale, wooden wire, or rail set up or used as a fence, or any or'gate!'''^' stile or gate, or any part thereof respectively, shaU, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, forfeit and pay, over and above the value of the article or articles so stolen, or the amount of the injury done, such sum of money not exceeding five pounds as to the justice shall seem meet ; and whosoever having been con- second victed of any such offence, either against this or ofeioe- any former act of Parliament, shall afterwards commit any of the said offences in this section before mentioned, and shall be convicted thereof in like manner, shall be committed to the com- mon gaol or house of correction, there to be kept to hard labour, for such term not exceeding twelve months as the convicting justice shall think fit. 35. If the whole or any part of any tree. Suspected sapling, or shrub, or any underwood, or any part pomeBsion 46 Larceny, &fc. Act, of wood, ftc, of any live or dead fence, or any post, pale, wire, not ^satiafac ^^.^^ ^^y^^ ^^ ^^^^^ ^^ ^^^ p^^ thereof, being of the fOT i™""^ value of one shilling at the least, shall be found in the possession of any person, or on the premises of any person, with his knowledge, and such person, being taken or summoned before a justice of the peace, shall not satisfy the justice that he came lawfully by the same, he shall on conviction by the justice forfeit and pay, over and above the value of the article or articles so found, any sum not exceeding two pounds. steaiing.&o., 36. Whosoever shall steal, or shall destroy or any fruit or damage with intent to steal, any plant, root, fruit, production or vegetable production growing in any garden, ftc^pun?*-' orchard, pleasure ground, nursery ground, hot- abie on sum- house, greenhouse, or conservatory, shall, on Son'for conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, first offence. a,t the discretion of the justice, either be com- mitted to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be im.prisoned only, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour, for any term not exceed- ing six months, or else shall forfeit and pay, over and above the value of the article or articles so stolen, or the amount of the injury done, such sum of money not exceeding twenty pounds as Second to the justice shall seem meet : and whosoever fSony^' having been convicted of any such offence, either against this or any former act of Parliament, shall afterwards commit any of the offences in this section before mentioned, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be punished in the same manner as in the case of simple larceny. stealing, &0. 37. Whosoever shall steal, or shall destroy or ^^^d"'a° damage with intent to steal, any cultivated root not growing or plant used for the food of man or beast, or for m gardens, j^gdicine, or for distilling or for dyeing, or for or in the course of any manufacture, and growing in any land, open or inclosed, not being a garden. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 47 orchard, pleasure ground, or nursery ground, stall, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, at the discretion of the justice, either be committed to the common gaol or house of cor- rection, there to be imprisoned only, or to be im- prisoned and kept to hard labour for any term not exceeding one month, or else shall forfeit and pay, over and above the value of the article or articles so stolen, or the amount of the injury done, such sum of money not exceeding twenty shillings as to the justice shaU seem meet, and in default of payment thereof, together with the costs (if ordered), shall be committed as aforesaid for any term not exceeding one month, unless payment be sooner made ; and whosoever, having Second been convicted of any offence either against this o*""^- or any former act of Parliament, shall afterwards commit any of the said offences in this section before mentioned, and shall be convicted thereof in like manner, shall be committed to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be kept to hard labour, for such term not exceeding six months as the convicting justice shall think fit. As to larceny from mines : 38. Whosoever shall steal, or sever with intent Oreofmeiai, to steal, the ore of any metal, or any lapis calami- "'"'^ *"■ naris, manganese or mundick, or any wad, black oawke, or black lead, or any coal or cannel coal, from any mine, bed, or vein thereof respectively, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 39. Whosoever, being employed in or about any Miners re- mine, shall take, remove, or conceal any ore of ^°™ment any metal, or any lapis calaminaris, manganese, to dstrand. mundick, or other mineral found or being in such 48 Larceny, ^e. Act, mine, with, intent to defraud any proprietor of or any adventurer in such mine, or any workman or miner employed therein, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary con- finement. As to larceny from the person and other like offences : Bobbery or 40. Whosoever shall rob any person, or shall from the steal any chattel, money, or valuable security peraon. from the person of another, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. On trial for 41. If upon the trial of any person upon any lurySy indictment for robbery it shall appear to the jury convictof an upon the evidence that the defendant did not intent to rob, commit the crime of robbery, but that he did commit an assault with intent to rob, the defen- dant shall not by reason thereof be entitled to be acquitted, but the jury shall be at liberty to return as their verdict that the defendant is guilty of an assault with intent to rob; and thereupon such defendant shall be liable to be punished in the same manner as if he had been convicted upon an indictment for feloniously assaulting with intent to rob ; and no person so tried as is herein lastly mentioned shall be liable to be afterwards prosecuted for an assault with intent to commit the robbery for which he was so tried. Assauitmth 42. WhoBoever shall assault any person vrith 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 49 intent to rob shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall (save and except in the cases where a greater punishment is provided by this act) be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 43. Whosoever shall, being armed with any Bobbery or offensive weapon or instrument, rob or assault *^^™'"'y * . with intent to rob, any person, or shall, together armed, or by 1 with one or more other person or persons, rob, or o" robbery^' ■ assault with intent to rob, any person, or shall f^^ wound- ■ rob any person, and at the time of or immediately "^' before or immediately after such robbery shall I wound, beat, strike, or use any other personal violence to any person, shall be guilty of felony, ind being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Niisoretion of the court, to be kept in penal ser- vitude for life, or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and vrith or without solitary confine- ment. 44. Whosoever shall send, deliver, or utter. Letter, de- or directly or indirectly cause to be received, ™o°''"l knowing the contents thereof, any letter or writing with demanding of any person with menaces, and ™™*™^- without any reasonable or probable cause, any property, chattel, money, valuable security, or other valuable thing, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal ser- vitude for life or for any term not less than three years,^or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. D 50 Larceny, ^c. Act, Demanding 45.C®) Whosoever sliall witli menaces or by money, &0., ^^^^ demand any property, chattel, money, menaces, or valuable aeourity, or other valuable thing of any with intent person, with intent to steal the same, shall be to BteaL guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary eonflnemett,. Letter 46. (^^) Whosoever shall send, deliver, or utter, to'^use"(rf ^'^ directly or indirectly cause to be received, crime with knowing the contents thereof, anv letter or writing intent to • xi. x • j. xt. extort. acousmg or tnreatenmg to accuse any other person of any crime punishable by law with death or penal servitude for not less than seven years, or of any assault with intent to commit any rape, or of any attempt or endeavour to commit any rape, or of any infamous crime as hereinafter defined, with a view or intent in any of such cases to (")' In -S^- V. BobeHsm (ll L. T. Kep. 387 ; 34 L. J. M. 0, 35) the prisoner was indicted and convicted under this section for demanding money with menaces with intent to steal the same. It wag proved that the prosecator having spoken to a female in the street at night, the prisoner, a policemaii, came up and told him that he had been talking to a prostitute, and that he must go with him to Bridewell and that he, the prosecutor, was under a penalty of one pound and ooSts for talking to a prostitute in the streets, but that if he would give him five shillings, he might go about his business. The prosecutor thereupon gave him four shillings and sispeuGe. Upon this it was held that the con- viotion was right. Under this section the menace must be of such a nature and extent as to unsettle the mind of the person on whom it operates, and take away from his acts that element of free voluntary action which alone constitutes cbusent. It is a question for the jury whether the evidence in any particular case comes within that principle : (Reg. v. Wcilton, 9 Oox Grim. Oas. 268 ; 32 L. J. M. 0. 79.) CO Uppn an indictment with three counts, for three separate letters, it was pl-oposed to prove the sending of all three. It was held, however, that the evidence of the sending of only one was admissible : (Reg. v. Ward, 10 Cox Grim. Gas. 42. Byles,J.) 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 96. 51 extort or gain by means of such letter or writing any property, chattel, money, valuable security, or other valuable thiBg, from any person, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for Ufe, or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping ; and the abominable crime of buggery, committed either "intamouB with mankind or with beast, and every assault deflnoa. with intent to commit the said abominable crime, and every attempt or endeavour to commit the said abominable crime, and every solicitation, persua- sion, promise, or threat offered or made to any person whereby to move or induce such person to commit or permit the said abominable crime, shall be deemed to be an infamous crime within the meaning of this act. 47.(")' Whosoever shall accuse or threaten to Accusing or accuse, either the person to whom such accusa- to^ccuBe" tion or threat shall be made or any other person, with intent A «■,.« ,1-ij.i to extort 01 any of the mfamous or other crimes lastly hereinbefore mentioned, with the view or intent in any of the cases last aforesaid to extort or gain from such person so accused or threatened to be accused, or from any other person, any property, chattel, money, valuable security, or other valu- able thing, shall be guilty of felony, and being C) On the trial of an indictment for threatening to accuse of an infamous crime, in order to extort money, the guilt of innocence of the party threatened is quite immaterial. Therefore, although the prosecutor may be cross-examined with a view to show that he is really guilty of the offence iittputed to him, yet no evidence will be allowed to be given even in cross-examination by another witness to prove that the prosecutor is really guilty : (Beg. v. Crachndt, 10 Cox Grim. Cas. 408. Willes, J.) D 2 52 Larceny, ^c. Act, conTicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for Ufe, or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Inducing a 48. Whosoever, with intent to defraud or Ttoienoe or i'^j^'^s 3,ny other person, shall, by any unlawful threats to violence to or restraint of, or threat or violence deeds, (Sc. to or restraint of, the person of another, or by withinteiit accusing or threatening to accuse any person of any treason, felony, or infamous crime as here- inbefore defined, compel or induce any person to execute, make, accept, indorse, alter, or destroy the whole or any part of any valuable security, or to write, impress, or affix his name, or the name of any other person, or of any company, firm, or copartnership, or the seal of any body corporate, company, or society, upon or to any paper or parchment, in order that the same may be after- wards made or converted into, or used or dealt with as, a valuable security, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life, or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or vnthout hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. It shall be 49. It shall be immaterial whether the menaces immaterial or threats hereinbefore mentioned be of violence, from whom .. l- i_ i -i i -, -, the menaces mjury, or acousatiou to be caused or made by the proceed. offender or by any other person. As to sacrilege, burglary, and house- breaking : Breaking 50. Whosoever shall break and enter any '"'h™'h™^ church, chapel, meeting house, or other place of chapel and Divine worship, and commit any felony therein. 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 9fi. 53 or being in any churcli, chapel, meeting house, or oommittdn- other place of Divine worship shall commit any ""^ '*^°"'' felony therein and break out of the same, shall be guilty of felony, and being con-ricted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life, or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 51. Whosoever shall enter the dwelling house Burglary by of another with intent to commit any felony *'™*'^i''g<»>t therein, or being in such dwelling house shall commit any felony therein, and shall in either case break out of the said dwelling house in the night, shall be deemed guilty of burglary. 52. Whosoever shall be convicted of the crime Burglary of burglary shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life, or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or vyithout solitary confinement. 53. No building, although within the same What build- curtilage with any dwelling house, and occupied J£f^"SS'ge therewith, shall be deemed to be part of such shall bo dweHing house for any of the purposes of this of Z"^ ''°'''' act, unless there shall be a communication between dwelling such building and dwelling house, either im- mediate, or by means of a covered and inclosed passage leading from the one to the other. 54.(^^) Whosoever shall enter any dwelling Entering a house in the night with intent to commit any ^q^"' ta the ('*) Not necessaru to specify the goods. — In an indictment for attempting to steal goods and chattels in a dwelling- house it is not necessary to specify the goods : {Reg. v. Johmon and another, 11 L. T. Eep. 389 ; 34 L. J. M. 0. 24.) 54 Larceny, ^c. Act, Breaking into any building within the curtilage wbichisno part of the dwelling house and committing any felony. night with felony fherein, shall be guilty of felony, and being mSmifany oonvicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion felony. q£ ^j^g go^rt, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 55. Whosoever shall break and enter any build- ing, and commit any felony therein, such building being within the curtilage of a dwelling house, and occupied therewith, but not being part thereof, according to the provision hereinbefore mentioned, or being in any such building shall commit any felony therein, and break out of the same, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confine- ment. Breaking 56. Whosoever shall break and enter any "o°g6°Ihop, dwelling house, schoolhouse, shop, warehouse, or warehouse, counting house, and commit any felony therein, committing or, being in any dwelling house, schoolhouse,, shop, any felony, -vyarehouse, or counting house, shall com m it any felony therein, and break out of the same, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not ex- ceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. House- 57. Whosoever shall break and enter any Aorwith'in- dwelling house, church, chapel, meeting house, or tent to com- pther place of Divine worship, or any building 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 55 witHn the curtilage, schoolliouse, shop, ware- mit any house, or counting house, with intent to commit '®'°°y- any felony therein, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary couflnem.ent. 58. (^') Whosoever shall be found by night Being armed armed with any dangerous or offensive weapon ^ bre'ak and or instrument whatsoever, with intent to break or enter any enter into any dwelling house or other building ii°"ht "" ° whatsoever, and to commit any felony therein, or shall be found by night having in his possession without lawful excuse (the proof of which excuse shall lie on such person) any picklock, key, crow, jack, bit, or other implement of housebreaking, or shall be found by night having his face black- ened or otherwise disguised vnth intent to commit any felony, or shall be found by night in any dwelling house or other building whatsoever with intent to com.mit any felony therein, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the C) To support, a conviction under this section it is neces- sary that the person should be proved to have the intent of breaking into, or entering some particular building, and proof of a general intent to break into houses will be in- sufficient. The indiotmeut must, as in burglary, allege the ownership a-nd situation of the premises intended to bo broken into : (_Keg. v. Jarrald, 32 L. J. M. C. 258 ; 9 Cox Grim. Cas. 307 ; Leigh & Ca,ve, 301.) Possession oj implements — Possession by one. — Where several persons are found out together by night for the common purpose of housebreaking, and one only is in pos- session of housebreakii;ig implements, all may be found guilty of the misdemeanor of being found by night in possession of implemonra of housebreaking without lawful excuse, for the possession of one is in such case the posses- sion of all : (^Reg. v. Thompson, 21 L. 1'. Rep. 397.) 56 Larceny, Sfc. Act, court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. The like 59. Whosoever shall be convicted of any such previons misdemeanor as in the last preceding section conviction mentioned, committed after a previous conviction, ^r eony, gj^^^gr for felony orsuch misdemeanor, shall on such subsequent conviction be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding ten years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. As to larceny in the house : stealing in a 60. Whosoever shall steal in any dwelling dwelling house any chattel, money, or valuable security, to value of 51 the value in the whole of five pounds or more, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. stealing in a 61. Whosoever shall steal any chattel, money, dwelling qj- valuable security in any dwelling house, and menaces. shall by any menace or threat put any one being therein in bodily fear, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. As to larceny in manufactories : stealing 62. Whosoever shall steal, to the value of ten goods in shillings, any woollen, linen, hempen, or cotton 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 96. 57 yarn, or any goods or article of silk, woollen, linen, prooeas of cotton, alpaca, or motair, or of any one or more of J^™"'""- tliose materials mixed with each other, or mixed with any other material, whilst laid, placed, or ex- posed, during any stage, process, or progress of manufacture, in any building, field, or other place, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. As to larceny in ships, wharfs, &c. : 63. Whosoever shall steal any goods or mer- steaUng chandise in any vessel, barge, or boat of any dooks^'''''' description whatsoever in any haven, or in any wharfs, &a port of entry or discharge, or upon any navigable river or canal, or in any creek or basin belonging to or communicating with any such haven, port, river, or canal, or shaU. steal any goods or mer- chandise from any dock, wharf, or quay adjacent to any such haven, port, river, canal, creek, or basin, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 64. Whosoever shall plunder or steal any part siealing of any ship or vessel which shall be in distress, a^^ess'or ° or wrecked, stranded, or cast on shore, or any wrecked, goods, merchandise, or articles of any kind belonging to such ship or vessel, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding • D 3 68 Larceny, Src. Act, fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement ; and the offender may be indicted and tried either in the county or place in which the offence shall have been com- mitted or in any county or place next adjoining. Persons in 65. If any goods, merchandise, or articles of Km"'"" ^°y ^"'^ belonging to any ship or vessel in wrecked distress or wrecked, stranded, or cast on shore, KWing°B°' shall be found in the possession of any person, or satisfactory gn the premises of any person with his know- ledge, and such person, being taken or summoned before a justice of the peace, shall not satisfy the justice that he came lawfully by the same, then the same shall, by order of the justice, be forthwith delivered over to or for the use of the rightful owner thereof ; and the offender shall, on conviction of such offence before the justice, at the discretion of the justice, either be committed to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be imprisoned only, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour, for any term not exceeding six months, or else shall forfeit and pay, over and above the value of the goods, merchandise, or articles, such sum of money not exceeding twenty pounds as to the justice shall seem meet. If any per- ^6. If any person shall offer or expose for sale Bon offers any goods, merchandise, or articles whatsoever, goodsW which shall have been unlawfully taken, or shall sale the ^g reasonably suspected so to have been taken, goods may l.- l • j- j. i j be seized, from any snip or vessel in distress, or wrecked, ■ stranded, or cast on shore, in every such case any person to whom the same shall be offered for sale, or any officer of the customs or excise, or peace officer, may lawfully seize the same, and shall with all convenient speed carry the same, or give notice of such seizure to some justice of the peace; and if the person who shall have 24 ^ 25 Vict cap. 96. 59 offered or exposed the same for sale, being sum- moned by such justice, shall not appear and satisfy the justice that he came lawfully by suoh goods, merchandise, or articles, then the same shall, by order of, the justice, be forthwith de- livered over to or for the use of the rightful owner thereof, upon payment of a reasonable reward (to be ascertained by the justice) to the person who seized the same ; and the offender shall, on conviction of such offence by the justice, at the discretion of the justice, either be com- mitted to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be imprisoned only, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour, for any tenn not exceeding six months, or else shall forfeit and pay, over and above the value of the goods, merchandise, or articles, such sum of money not exceeding twenty pounds as to the justice shall seem meet. As to larceny or embezzlement by clerks, servants, or persons in the public service : 67.(^'') Whosoever, being a clerk or servant. Larceny by or being employed for the purpose or in the capa- seryaota (20) Servant fravd-uknUy accounting for nwfmy enti^usted to Mm for payment. — A servant's duty was to give out materials to be wrought up and pay tlie workmen when the work was finished, and for this purpose he received cash from his masters, and at the end of each week he accounted to them for sums so received and paid. The cash was kept by him, but he was not authorised to apply the money in any other way. He paid 0. 13s. and fraudulently charged his employers as having paid 14s. 8d.. and appropriated the Is. 8d. to his own use. Held, that this amounted to larceny : (Seg. v. Low, 13 L. T. Bep. 642. ) Servant appi^opriating money to his own vse. — Money was given to the prisoner for the purpose of paying turnpike tolls at two gates on hia journey. Twelve days afterwards, on being asked if he had paid the toll at one of the gates, he said he had not — that he had gone by a parish road, which only crossed the road at the gate, and so no toll was payable there, and that he had spent the money on beer for himself and his mates. The prisoner having been con- victed of larceny of the money, but it not appearing on a case reserved as to whether the facts proved a larceny, 60 Larceny, #c. Act, city of a clerk or servant, shall steal any ohattel, money, or valuable security belonging to or in the possession or power of his master or employer, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Embezzle- 68.('^) Whosoever, being a clerk or servant, , derksor Or being employed for the purpose or in the servants. that the question of felonious intent had been distinctly left to the jury, the court quashed the couvictiou • (Reg. v. Beei-ing, 20 L. T. Eep. 680.) (21) Under this section it was held that where A. agreed to engage B. as agent, or traveller, for the sale of coals, at a . salary of one guinea per week, and one shilling per ton, as commission on coals sold, and sixpence per ton on coals sold to dealers procured by B. as customers, and B. agreed to collect all moneys in connection with his orders, the com- mission not to be due until the money was received by A., and moneys received by B. not to be kept more than one week in his hands ; that B. was a clerk, or servant. But it was also held in the same case, that where, after B. had been in A.'s service about a year, B. being desirous of selling coals by retail on his own account, A. agreed to supjjly him with coals, and then made the following alteration in their agreemen t, — " As you are now going into the retail coal trade on your own account, we think it best to have a proper understanding, and in future we pay you a commission ouly. your salary will be stopped from this date ; there is a largo amoimt against you, and we request you to get it in," — that under this new agreement B. was not a clerk, or servant • QReg v. Bowers, 15 Cox Grim. Gas. 260 ; 35 L. J. M. V. 206.) A commission, agent not a clerk or servant — The prisoner was employed by a coal merchant nnder an agreement " that he was to receive Is. per ton procuration fee, payable out of the first payment, 4 per cent, for collecting, and Sd. on the last payment. Collections to be paid on Friday evening before five p.m. ; on Saturday before two p.m." He received no salary, was not obliged to be at the office except on Friday or Saturday, to account for what money he had received. He was at liberty to go where he pleased for orders. Held, that the prisoner was not a clerk or 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 96. 61 capacity of a clerk or servant, shall fraudulently embezzle any chattel, money, or valuable security. servant withia the statute: (Reg. v. Marshall, 21 L. T. Rep. 796.) IMie prisoner agreed with the prosecutor, a manufacturer of earthenwnre, to act as his traveller, and " diligently employ himself by going from town to town in England, Irelund, and Scotland, and soliciting orders for the printed and decorated earthenware, manufactured by" the prose- cutor, and that he would not, without the consent in writing of the prosecutor, " take or execute any order for vending or disposing of any goods of the nature or kind aforesaid for or on account of himself or any other person." It was further agreed that the prisoner should be paid by commission, and should render weekly accounts. The prosecutor subsequently gave the prisoner written per- mission to take orders for two other manufacturers. The prisoner being indicted under the 68th section : Held, that he was a " clerk or servant" of the prosecutor within the meaning of the section: (Reg. v. Tm-Tier, 22 L. T. Bep. 278.) Who not a clerh or servant. — The treasurer of a friendly society, under the 18 & 19 Vict., c. 63, into whose hands the moneys received on behalf of the society were to be paid, and who was to pay no money exoopt by an order signed by the secretary, and countersigned by the chairman or a ti'ustee, and who, by the statute, was bound to render an account to the trustees, and pay over the balance on such accounting when required, is not a clerk or servant, and cannot be indicted for embezzlement of such balance : (Reg. V. Tp^, 19 L. T. Eep. 657 ; 1 Law Bep. 0. C. Res. 177.) BemJUbvilding society — Secretary. — The trusteesof abenefit building society borrowed money for the purposes of their society on their individual responsibility (there being no rule of the society authorising them to borrow money.) The money on one occasion was received by the secretary and embezzled by him. Held, that the secretary mi^ht be charged with embezzlement as the servant of W. and others, W. being one of the trustees, and a member of the societv : (Reg. V. Redford, 21 L. T. Bep. 508.) Assistant overseer. — An assistant overseer of the poor, appointed by the inhabitants of a parish in vestry assembled, by virtue of the 59 Geo. 3, c. 12, s. 7, is properly described iu an indictment for embezzlement of moneys collected by him for poor-rate, as the servant of the inhabitants of the parish. (Reg. v. Carpenter, 14 L. T. Bep. 572 ; 35 L. J. M. C. 169.) County court bailiff. — A county court bailiff was indicted for embezzling moneys of the prosecutor, the high bailiff. The moneys embezzled were received on levies under county court processes. Held, that the charge could not be sustained, as the relation of master and aervaut did not 62 Larceny, ire Act, wMch shall be delivered to or received or taken into possession by him for or in the name or on the account of his master or employer, or any part thereof, shall be deemed to have feloniously stolen the same from his master or employer, although such chattel, money, or security was not received into the possession of such master or employer otherwise than by the actual possession of his clerk, servant, or other person so employed, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male, under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Larceny by 69. Whosoever, being employed in the public th™Queen'a ss'^^ioe of Her Majesty, or being a constable or service, or other person employed in the police of any county, city, borough, district, or place what- soever, shall steal any chattel, money, or valuable security belonging to or in the possession or power of Her Majesty, or intrusted to or received exist between the bailiff and the high-bailiff, nor was the bailiff bouad to pay over the moneys to him : (JBeg. v. Glover, 10 L. T. Hep. 582 ; 33 L. J. M. C. 169.) Trades union — Embezzlement of funds by its officers. — An unregistered friendly society or trades union rnfiy pro- secute its servants for embezzlement of its property, though some of its rules may be void as being in restraint of trade, and contrary to public policy : (JReg. v. Stainer, 21 L. T. Kep. 758.) Money —Cheque not converted. — An indictment for em- bezzling money under sects. 67 and 68 is not proved by showing merely that the prisoner embezzled a cheque without evidence that he has converted the cheque into money: (Beg. v. Keena, 17 L. T. Eep. 515; Law Bep. 1 0. C. Res., 113.) The 31 & 32 Vict. c. 116 (" An Act to amend the Law relating to Larceny and Embezzlement ") greatly extends the law upon this subject by including members of a co- partnership : (see the statute, post.') by the police 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 63 or taken into possession by tim by virtue of bis emplo3rment, sball be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years,' — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 70. Whosoever, being employed in the public Embezzic- service of Her Majesty, or being a constable or "e^ona'^jn other person employed in the police of any 'he Queen's county, city, borough, district, or place, what- by the police soever, and intrusted by virtue of such employ- ment with the receipt, custody, management, or control of any chattel, money, or valuable security, shall embezzle any chattel, money, or valuable security, which shall be intrusted to or received or taken into possession by him by virtue of his employment, or any part thereof, or in any manner fraudulently apply or dispose of the same or any part thereof to his own use or benefit, or for any purpose whatsoever except for the public service, shall be deemed to have feloniously stolen the same from Her Majesty, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour ; and every offender against this or the Venue, last preceding section may be dealt with, indicted, tried, and punished either in the county or place in which he shall be apprehended or be in cus- tody, or in which he shall have committed the offence ; and in every case of larceny, embezzle- Form of ment, or fraudulent application or disposition of ^o^^Ji^^'nt any chattel, money, or valuable security in this and indict- and the last preceding section mentioned, it shaU ™*° • be lawful in the warrant of commitment by the 64 Larceny, ^c. Act, justice of the peace before whom the offender shall be charged, and in the indictment to be preferred against such off endjgr, to lay the property of any such chattel, money, or valuable security in Her Majesty. Ustinctacto 71. For preventing difficulties in the prose- of embezzle- cution of offenders in any case of embezzlement, ^argedfn ^ fraudulent application or disposition, hereinbefore '^di^t™^ mentioned, it shall be lawful to charge in the indictment and proceed against the offender for any number of distinct acts of embezzlement, or of fraudulent application or disposition, not ex- ceeding three, which may have been committed by him against Her Majesty or against the same master or employer, within the space ,of six months from the first to the last of such acts ; and in every such indictment where the offence shall relate to any money or any valuable security it shall be sufficient to allege the embezzlement, or fraudulent application or disposition, to be of money, without specifying any particular coin or valuable security ; and such allegation, so far as regards the description of the property, shall be sustained if the offender shall be proved to have embezzled or fraudulently applied or disposed of any amount, although the particular species of coin or valuable security of which such am.ount was composed shall not be proved ; or if he shall be proved to have embezzled or fraudulently applied or disposed of any. piece of coin or any valuable security, or any portion .of the value thereof, although such piece of coin or valuable security may have been delivered- to him in order that some part of the value thereof should be returned to the party delivering the same, or to some other person, and such part shall have been returned accordingly. Persona 72. If upon the trial of any person indicted for indicted for embezzlement, or fraudulent application or dis- ment as a position as aforesaid, it shall be proved that he 24 #25 Vict. cap. 96. 65 took the property in question in any such manner clerk, te., as to amount in law to larceny, he shall not by ao'uuted if reason thereof be entitled to be acquitted, but the the offence jury shall be at liberty to return as their verdict lete^y , that such person is not guilty of embezzlement, or ■""* ""* fraudulent application or disposition, but is guilty '"^'"'' of simple larceny, or of larceny as a clerk, servant, or person employed for the purpose or ia the capacity of a clerk or servant, or as a person em- ployed in the public service, or in the police, as the case ^ may be ; and thereupon such person shall be liable to be punished in the same manner as if he had been convicted upon an indictment for such larceny ; and if upon the trial of any per- son indicted fpr larceny it shall be proved that he took the property in question in any such manner as to amount in law to embezzlement, or frau- ' dulent application or disposition as aforesaid, he shall not by reason thereof be entitled to be acquitted, but the jury shall be at liberty to return as their verdict that such person is not guilty of larceny, but is guilty of embezzlement, or fraudulent application or disposition, as the case may be, and thereupon such person shall be liable to be punished in the same manner as if he had been convicted upon an indictment for Such embezzlement, fraudulent application or dispo- sition ; and no person so tried for embezzlement, fraudulent application or disposition, or larceny as aforesaid, shall be liable to be afterwards pro- secuted for l9,rceny, fraudulent application or disposition, or embezzlement, upon the same facts. 7'd.(^^) Whosoever, being an officer or servant Embezzie- of the Governor and Company of the Bank of oiTevTot England or of the Bank of Ireland, and being «"« Bank of intrusted with any bond, deed, note, bill, dividend I'refand. °^ ('-') This section is more comprehensive than the 12th section of the 15 Geo. 2, c. 13. 66 Larcmy, ^c. Act, warrant, or warrant for pajrment of any annuity or interest, or money, or witt any security, money, or other effects of or belonging to the Baid Governor and Company, or having any bond, deed, note, bill, dividend warrant, or warrant for pajrment of any annuity, or interest, or money, or any security, mbney, or other effects of any other person, body politic or corporate, lodged or deposited with the said Governor and Com- pany, or with him as an officer or servant of the said Governor and Company, shall secrete, em- bezzle, or run away with any such bond, deed, note, bill, dividend or other warrant, security, money, or other effects as aforesaid, or any part thereof, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be hable, at the discretion of ■ the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. As to larceny by tenants or lodgers : Tenant or 74. Whosoever shall steal any chattel or fixture ■°'is?5 ^^- let to be used by him or her in or with any house or flxtare let or lodging, whether the contract shall have been hoS^roT"*' entered into by him or her or by her husband, odginga. or by any person on behalf of him or her or her husband, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, arid with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping, and, in case the value of such chattel or fixtures shall exceed the sum of five pounds, shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 67 exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping ; and in every case of stealing any chattel in this section mentioned it shall be lawful to prefer an indictment in the common form as for Isirceny, and in eVery case of stealing any fixture in this section mentioned to prefer an indictment in the same form as if the offender were not a tenant or lodger, and in either case to lay the property in the owner or person letting to hire. As to frauds by agents, bankers, or factors : 75. Whosoever, having been intrusted, either Agent, solely, or jointly with any other person, as a embSitag' banker, merchant, broker, attorney, or other ™<™ey or agent, with any money or security for the pay- llourifies, ment of money, with any direction in writing to ^'^^"'"^ apply, pay, or deliver such money or security or any part thereof respectively, or the proceeds or any part of the proceeds of such security, for any purpose, or to any person specified in such direc- tion, shall, in violation of good faith, and contrary to the terms of such direction, in any~wise convert to his own use or benefit, or the use or benefit of any person other than the person by whom he shall have been so intrusted, such money, security, or proceeds, or any part thereof respectively ; and whosoever, having been intrusted either solely, or jointly with any other person as banker, mer- or goods, chant, broker, attorney, or other agent, with any to iiim fo, chattel or valuable security, or any power of safe custody, attorney for the sale or transfer of any share or interest in any public stock or fund, whether of the United Kingdom, or any part thereof, or of any foreign state, or in any stock or fund of any body corporate, company, or society, for safe custody or for any special purpose, without any authority to sell, negotiate, transfer, or pledge, shall, in violation of good faith, and contrary to 68 Larceny, ^c. Act, tlie object or purpose for wMcli suoli cHattel, security, or power of attorney stall have been in- trusted to bim, to sell, negotiate, transfer, pledge, or in any manner convert to Ms own use or benefit, or tbe use or benefit of any person other than the person by whom he shall have been so in- trusted, such chattel or security, or the proceeds of the same, or any part thereof, or the share or interest in the stock or fund to which such power of attorney shall relate, or any part thereof, shall Punishment be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. Not to affect and with or without solitary confinement ; but mor^agees; nothing in this section contained relating to agents shall affect any trustee in or under any instrument whatsoever, or any mortgagee of any property, real or personal, in respect of any act done by such trustee or mortgagee in relation to the pro- perty comprised in or affected by any such trust nor bankers, or mortgage ; nor shall restrain any banker, fng money merchant, broker, attorney, or other agent from due on receiving any money which shall be or become ' actually due and payable upon or by virtue of any valuable security, according to the tenor and effect thereof, in such manner as he might have done if or disposing this act had not been passed ; nor from selling, on whiS'^^ transferring, or otherwise disposing of any secu- thoy have a rities Or effects in his possession upon which he shall have any lien, claim, or demand entitling him by law so to do, unless such sale, transfer, or other disposal shall extend to a greater number or part of such securities or effects than shall be re- quisite for satisfying such lien, claim, or demand. Bankers, Ac. 76. Whosoever, being a banker, merchant, fraudulently iji-gker, attorney, or agent, and being intrusted. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 69 either solely, or jointly with any other person, selling, &c., with the property of any other person for safe Smtod to custody, shall, with intent to defraud, sell, their care, negotiate, transfer, pledge, or in any manner convert or appropriate the same or any part thereof to or for his own use or benefit, or the use or benefit of any person other than the person by whom he was so intrusted, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to any of the punishments which the court may award as hereinbefore last mentioned. 77. Whosoever, being intrusted, either solely. Persons or jointly with any other person, with any power "0*"^^ „£ of attorney for the sale or transfer of any pro- attorney perty, shall fraudulently sell or transfer or other- selling °°' ^ wise convert the same or any part thereof to his property. own use or benefit, or the use or benefit of any person other than the person by whom he was so intrusted, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and. being convicted thereof shaU be liable, at the dis- cretion of the court, to any of the punishments which the court may award as hereinbefore last mentioned. 78. Whosoever, being a factor or agent in- Poctms trusted, either solely, or jointly with any other °^^'^^j,"Jo„ person, for the purpose of sale or otherwise, with the property the possession of any goods, or of any document prinotpala of title to goods, shall, contrary to or without the authority of his principal in that behalf, for his own use or benefit, or the use or benefit of any person other than the person by whom he was so intrusted, and in violation of good faith, make any consignment, deposit, transfer, or delivery of any goods or document of title so intrusted to him as in this section before mentioned, as and by way of a pledge, lien, or security for any money or valuable security borrowed or received by such factor or agent at or before the time of 70 Larceny, ^c. Act, making such consignment, deposit, transfer, or delivery, or intended to be thereafter borrowed or received, or shall^ contrary to or without such authority, for his own use or benefit, or the use or benefit of any person other than the person by whom he was so intrusted, and in violation of good faith, accept any advance of any money or \aiuabIo security on the faith of any contract or agreement to consign, deposit, transfer, or deliver any such goods or document of title, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to any of the punishments which the court oieiliB may award as hereinbefore last mentioned ; and ■wilfully every clerk and other person who shall knowingly °' and wilfully act and assist in making any such consignment, deposit, transfer, or delivery, or in accepting or procuring such advance as aforesaid, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of CttEBB excep- the court, to any of the same punishments : pro- the pMge vided, that no such factor or agent shall be liable doBBDot to any prosecution for consigning, depositing, amount of transferring, or delivering any such goods or their lien, documents of title, in case the same shall not be made a security for or subject to the payment of any greater sum of money than the amount which at the time of such consignment, deposit, transfer, or delivery was justly due and owing to such agent from his principal, together with the amount of any bill of exchange drawn by or on account of such principal, and accepted by such factor or agent. Deflnitiona 79. Any factor or agent intrusted as aforesaid, "intrusted ■" ^^^ possessed of any such document of title, whether derived immediately from the owner of such goods or obtained by reason of such factor or agent having been La trusted with the possession of the goods, or of any other document of title 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 71 tliereto, shall be deemed to have been intrusted with the possession of the goods represented by such document of title ; and every contract " pledge :" pledging or giving a Uen upon such document of title as aforesaid shall be deemed to be a pledge of and lien upon the goods to which the same relates ; and such factor or agent shall be deemed "posaeBBed:" to be possessed of such goods or document, whether the same shall be in his actual custody, or shall be held by any other person subject to his control, or for him or on his behalf ; and where any loan or advance shall be bona fide made to "Advance:" any factor or agent intrusted with and in posses- sion of any such goods or document of title, on the faith of any contract or agreement in writing to consign, deposit, transfer, or deUver such goods or documents of title, and such goods or docu- ment of title shall actually be received by the person making such loan or advance, without notice that such factor or agent was not autho- rised to make such pledge or security, every such loan or advance shall be deemed to be a loan or advance on the security of saoh goods or docu- ment of title within the meaning of the last pre- ceding section, though such goods or document of title shall not actually be received by the person making such loan or advance till the period subse- quent thereto ; and any contract or agreement, " Contract whether made direct with such factor or agent, ^enl'"^ or with any clerk or other person on his behalf, shall be deemed a contract or agreement with such factor or agent ; and any payment made, "Advance.- whether by money or bUl of exchange or other negotiable security, shall be deemed to be an advance within the meaning of the last preceding section ; and a factor or agent in possession as Poj^"!^™ aforesaid of such goods or document shall be aence of in- taken, for the purposes of the last preceding sec- t™=«°g- tion, to have been intrusted therewith by the owner thereof, unless the contrary be shown in evidence. 72 Larceny, Sfc. Act, Trustees 80. Whosoever, being a trustee of any pro- dtapo"i™'!if perty for the use or benefit, either wholly or property, partially, of some other person, or for any public miede- or charitable purpose, shall, with intent to defraud, meaner. convert or appropriate the same or any part thereof to or for his own use or benefit, or the use or benefit of any person other than such person as aforesaid, or for any purpose other than such, public or charitable purpose as aforesaid, or other- wise dispose of or destroy such property or any part thereof, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to any of the punishments which the court may award as hereinbefore last No proseou- mentioned : provided, that no proceeding or pro- commenced^ secution for any offence included in this section without the shall be commenced without the sanction of Her some judge Majesty's Attorney-General, or, in case that oflSce SeySleteral ^^ vacant, of Her Majesty's Solicitor-General : provided also, that where any civil proceeding shall have been taken against any person to whom the provisions of this section may apply, no person who shall have taken such civil proceeding shall commence any prosecution under this section without the sanction of the court or judge before whom such civU proceeding shall have been had or shall be pending. Directors, 81. Whosoever, being a director, member, or body oOTpo- P^^li" officer of an.y body coi-porate or public ' rate or pub- company, shall fraudulently take or apply for his lie company i: ■' in, i rr^ fraudulently own use or benefat, or tor any use or purposes ato™''"" other than the use or purposes of such body property; corporate or public company, any of the pro- perty of such body corporate or public com- pany, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to any of the punish- ments which the court may award as hereinbefore last mentioned. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 73 82. Whosoever, being a director, public officer, or keeping " " frauduleu' accounts ; or manager of any body corporate, or^public com' ''■''"*"i™' pany, shall as such receive or possess himself of any of the property of such body corporate or public company otherwise than in payment of a just debt or demand, and shall, with intent to defraud, omit to make or to ' cause or direct to be made a full and true entry thereof in the boots and accounts of such body corporate or public com- pany, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to any of the punishments which the court may award as hereinbefore last mentioned. 83. Whosoever, being a director, manager, or wilfully public officer, or member of any body corporate 2°^^°^^*. or public company, shall, with intent to defraud, destroy, alter, mutilate, or falsify any book, paper, writing, or valuable security belonging to the body corporate or pubUc company, or make or concur in the making of any false entry, or omit or concur in omitting any material particular, in any book of account or other document, shall be gmlty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to any of the punishments which the court may award, as hereinbefore last mentioned. 84. Whosoever, being a director, manager, or or pubUsh- publio officer of any body corporate or public {"^/^tTt*"" company, shall make, circulate, or publish, or ment^. concur in making, circulating, or publishing, any written statement or account which he shall know to be false in any material particular, with intent to deceive and defraud any member, shareholder, or creditor of such body corporate or pubUo com- pany, or with intent to induce any person to become a shareholder or partner therein, or to intrust or advance any property to such body corporate or public company, or to enter into any security for the benefit thereof, shall be guilty of 74 Larceny, ^c. Act, a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at tbe discretion of tbe court, to any of the punishments which the court may award, as hereinbefore last mentioned. No person to 85. Nothing in any of the last ten preceding from *™^' sections of this act contained shall enable or en- answering title any person to refuse to make a full and any^oourt,™ complete discovery by answer to any bill in but no per- equity, or to answer any question or interrogatory a disclosure iu any civil proceeding in any court, or upon the putaonr°pro- ^^^™g °^ ^"ly matter in bankruptcy or insol- cefdingtobe venoy; and no person shall be liable to be p'roseoution. convicted of any of the misdemeanors in any of the said sections mentioned by any evidence whatever in respect of any act done by him, if he shall at any time previously to his being charged with such offence have first disclosed such act on oath, in consequence of any compulsory process of any court of law or equity, in any action, suit, or proceeding which shall have been bond fide instituted by any party aggrieved, or if he shall have first disclosed the same in any compulsory examination or deposition before any court upon the hearing of any matter in bankrutcy or insolvency. j^fo remedy 86. Nothing in any of the last eleven preced- equttysMi ™S Sections of this act contained, nor any pro- be affected, oeeding, conviction, or judgment to be had or taken thereon against any person under any of the said sections, shall prevent, lessen, or impeach any remedy at law, or in equity, which any party aggrieved by any offence against any of the said sections might have had if this act had not been Convictions passed ; but no conviction of any such offender Svedin" shall be received in evidence in any action at law evidence in Or Suit in eqtiity against him ; and nothing in the oivii suits, gg^j^ sections contained shall affect or prejudice any agreement entered into or security given by any trustee, having for its object the restoration 24 # 25 Vict. cap. 96. 75 or^ repayment of any trust property misappro- priated. 87. No misdemeanor against any of the last oertain mis- twelve preceding sections of this act shall be demeanors prosecuted or tried at any court of general or BesBions. quarter sessions of the peace. As to obtaining money, &c*, by false pre- tences : 88.(^^) Whosoever shall by any false pretence False obtain from any other person any chattel, money, p^'^'^s. (^ False pretence, or larceny. — It was the duty of the priaoner, a clerk, to pay dock dues upon goods exported by his master, and, tipon ascertaining the amount required upon each days export before paying it to obtain the sum from his master's cash-keeper. The prisoner knowing that 11. 3«. only was due on one of those days, fraudulently represented to the cash-keeper that a larger sum was due, and having obtained that, he paid the 12. 3s. and appro- priated the difference. Upon this it was held that although the evidence would have been sufScient to support an in- dictment for false pretences, he was not guilty of larceny: (ifeff. V. Thompson, 7 L. T. Eep. 393 ; 32 L. J. M. 0. 57.) Existing fact — Promise. — Money was obtained by the prisoner from an unmarried woman, on the false repre- sentation that he was a single man, and that he would furnish a house with the money, and would then marry her. Upon this it was held that the false representation of an existing fact (that he was a single man) was sufficient to support a conviction for false pretences, although the money was obtained by that representation, united with the promise to furnish a house and then niarry her : (Reg. V. Jennixon, 6 L. T. Eep. 266 ; 33 L. J. M. C. 146.) Fcise pi-etence — A promise. — The prosecutor lent 10/. to the prisoner on the false pretence that he was going to pay his rent, and if the prisoner had not told him that he was going to pay his rent, the prosecutor would not have lent the money. Held, that this was not a false pretence of an existing fact to warrant a conviction : (Eeg. v. Lee, 8 L. T. Bep. 437.) False statement of existing fact. — An indictment charged that the prisoner did falsely pretend to A. that she (the prisoner) had power to bring back A.'s husband to her. The evidence was that A. met a woman, and conversed with her, and in consequence of that A. went to the prisonet and asked her to tell her a few words by the cards to fetch her husband back. The prisoner then asked what money the prosecutrix bad, ntid obtained from her some e2 76 Larceny, ^c. Aci, or valuable security, with intent to defraud, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted money and a drees. The prisoner said that she could bring A.'s husband back over hedges and ditches with the stuff she had to work upon. Held, first, that the indictment charged a false pretence of an existing fact, and was good : Secondly, that the evidence was sufQcient, connecting it together, to show wiat the money was parted with in con- sequence of the false pretence, and not antecedently to the making of it : (Beg. v. Giles,, 11 L. T. Eep. 643 ; 34 L. J. M. 0. 50.) Rejn'esentafion of a trade mavh. — A false representation that a stamp on a watch was the hall mark of the Gold- smith's Company, and that the number 18, part thereof, indicated that the watch was made of eighteeu-carat gold, is an indictable offence, and is not the less so because accompanied by a representation that tlie watch was a gold one, and some gold was proved to have been contained in its composition : (Reg. v. Suter and another, 17 L. T. Eep. 1770 Notes of a hank whick has stopped. — The defendant know- ing that some old country bank notes had been taken by his uncle forty years before, and that the bank had stopped payment, gave them to a man to pass, telling him to say, if asked about them, that he had taken them from a man he did not know. The man passed the notes, and the defendant obtained value for them. Held, that the defen- dant was guilty of obtaining money by false pretences; also, that the bankruptcy proceedings need not be proved : (Beg. V. Dowey, 17 L. T. Eep. 481; 37 L. J., M. 0. 62.) Bepresentation that goods were wdncumbered. — The prose- cutor lent money to the prisoner at interest on the security of a bill of sale ou furniture, a promissory note of prisoner and another person, and a declaration made by the prisoner that the furniture wag unencumbered. The declaration was untrue at the time it was handed to the prosecutor, the prisoner having a few hours before given a bill of sale for the furniture to another person, but not to its full value. Held, that there was evidence to go to the jury in support of a charge of obtaining money by false pretences : (Beg. v. Meakin, 20 L. T. Rep. 544.) Pretending to carry on a mtdness. — The prisoner obtained a sum of money from the prosecutor by pretending that he earned on an extensive business as an auctioneer and house agent, and that he wanted a clerk, and that the money was to be deposited as security for the prosecutor's honesty as such clerk. The jury found that the prisoner was not carrying ou any such business at all. Held, that this was an indictable false pretence : (Reg. v. Crabb, 18 L. T. Bep. 370.) Article not in esdst&ice. — It is no objection to an indict- ment for false pretences, that the thing obtained was not in 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 96. 77 tliereof shall be liable at tbe discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement : provided, that it upon the the trial of any person No aoqaittai indicted for such misdemeanor it shall be proved 0^°™° '^® that he obtained the property in question in any amounts to such manner as to amount in law to larceny, he ""'"'"y- shall not by reason thereof be entitled to be acquitted of such misdemeanor ; and no person tried for such misdemeanor shall be liable to be afterwards prosecuted for larceny upon the same facts : provided also, that it shaU be sufficient in Form of in- any indictment for obtaining or attempting to ^na™™' existence at the time of making the false pretence, provided that the false pretence continued, and the thing when made was delivered under the influence thereof: (Reg. v. Hartin, 15 L. T. Eep. 341 ; L. Bep. 1 Cr. Oas. Eea. 56.) IndictTnent — Part-ieularity — Evidence. — The indictment charged that the prisoners ialsely pretended that two loads of soot which they then delivered weighed 1 ton 17 cwt, whereas they weighed but 1 ton 13 cwt. by means of which false pretences they obtained Ss. The evidence was that a contract existed between the prosecutor and the prisoners for soot which prosecutor was to buy at the rate of 38s. per ton. Deliveries were made from time to time and payment was made according to the quantities so pretended to be delivered. The prisonera put broken bricks and slack amongst the soot in their cart, and went to a public weigh- ing machine and got the whole weighed, and a ticket of such weight given. Afterwards the bricks and slack were re- moved, and the cart with the soot in it taken to the prosecutor and the soot delivered and the tickets presented, and payment made by the prosecutor according to the weights specified in the tickets. Held, that the indictment was sufHoiently specific in form, and that the prisoners were indictable for obtaining money by false pretences ; (Reg. v. Lee and miother, 10 L. T. Eep. 348.) Evidence of the acts of an accomplice. — An indictment charged K. and W. with falsely pretending to B. that they had a quantity of tobacco which they proposed to sell, and did sell to him, and thereby obtained money from him. The evidence was that K. and another person P. acting together were the chief parties by whom the false pretences were made. Held, that the acts of P. were the acts of K. and admissible against him upon the indictment: (Jlieg. v. Kerrigan, 9 L. T. Eep. 843 ; 33 L. J. M. 0. 71.), ' levi- - dence. 78 Larceny, ^c. Act, obtain any suoli property by false pretences to allege that the party accused did the act with intent to defraud, *without alleging an intent to defraud any particular person, and without alleging any ownership of the chattel, money, or valuable security ; and on the trial of any such indictment it shall not be necessary to prove an intent to defraud any particular person, but it shall be sufficient to prove that the party accused did the act charged with an intent to defraud. Where any 89. Whosoever shall by any false pretence cause money or qj. procure any money to be paid, or any chattel, oavjsed to bo or valuable security, to be delivered to any other delWercd to person, for the use or benefit or on account of the any person person making such false pretence, or of any other the person person, with intent to defraud, shall be deemed to J1!S,«'S^.°' tave obtained such money, chattel, or valuable raise pre- , .-. , .1.111 t tenoe. security withm the meaning of the last preceding section. Inducing 90. Whosoever, with intent to defraud or injure persona by g^„ other person, shall by any false pretence fraud to j.'^ii.i -j"^ ■^i.i J. execute fraudulently cause or mduce any other person to otherinstvu- execute, make, accept, indorse, or destroy the menta. whole or any part of any valuable security, or to write, impress, or affix his name, or the name of any other person, or of any company, firm, or co- partnership, or the seal of any body corporate, company, or society, upon any paper or parch- ment, in order that the same may be afterwards made or converted into or used or dealt with as a valuable security, shall be guilty of a misde- meanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 79 As to receiving stolen goods : 91. Whosoever shall receive any chattel, money, Heoeiviog, valuable security, or other property whatsoever, prinoipS^is the stealing, taking, extorting, obtaining, em- guuty of bezzling, or otherwise disposing whereof shall ^""^ amount to a felony, either at common law or by virtue of this act, knowing the same to have been feloniously stolen, taken, extorted, obtained, em- bezzled, or disposed of, shall be guilty of felony, and may be indicted and convicted either as an accessory after the fact or for a substantive felony, and in the latter case, whether the principal felon shall or shall not have been previously convicted, or shall or shaU not be amenable to justice ; and every such receiver, howsoever convicted, shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceed- ing fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male imder the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping : provided, that no person, howsoever tried for receiving as aforesaid, shaU be liable to be prosecuted a second time for the same offence. 92.(^*) In any indictment containing a charge indictment \ ' J 5 6 for stealing (^) It is worthy of observation, that this section, which is a re-enactment of sect. 3 of the 11 & 12 Vict. c. 46, does not adopt the language of the 91st section of the present act, for we find that it is only in an indictment containing a charge of feloniously stealing any property that it shall be lawful to add a count or several counts for feloniously receiving the same, or any part or parts thereof, knowing the same to have hem stoim; so that if the principal offence be not a stealing, but a felonious taking, extorting, embezzling, or otherwise disposing of any chattel, money, valuable security, or other property, there can be no count for receiving, such receiving being by the section required to be of the property, '• knowing the same to have been stolen." It may perhaps be suggested that feloniously " taking, extorting, embezzling, or otherwise disposing," is of itself a ttealmg ; but, if so, 80 Larceny, #c. Act, andrsoeiT- of feloniously stealing any property it sliall ™^- be lawful to add a count or several counts for feloniously receiving tte same or any part or parts thereof, knt^ing tlie same to liave been stolen, and in any indictment for feloniously receiving any property knowing it to liave been stolen it shall be lawful to add a count for feloniously stealing the same ; and where any such indictment shall have been preferred and found against any person, the prosecutor shall not be put to his election, but it shall be lawful for the jury who shall try the same to find a verdict of guilty, either of stealing the property, or of receiving the same, or any part or parts thereof, knowing the same to have been stolen ; and if such indictment shaU have been preferred and found against two or more persons it shall be lawful for the jury who shall try the same to find all or any of the said persons guilty either of stealing the property or of receiving the same, or any part or parts thereof, knowing the same to have been stolen, or to find one or more of the said persons guilty of stealing the property, and the other or others of them guilty of receiving the same or any part or parts thereof knowing the same to have been stolen. wherefore this enumeration in Beet. 91? If the word " stealing " be suf&cient in sect. 92, wherefore was it deemed to be insufficient in scot. 91 ? Husband and wife — Feloniovs receiving. — A husband and wife were jointly indicted for stealing and receiving, and the jury found the wife guilty of stealing, without any con- straint on the husband's part, and the husband guilty of receiving the stolen property, knowing at the time when the property was delivered to him that it had been stolen by his wife : Held, that the husband was properly convicted of receiving : (Seg. v. McAthey, 7 L, T. Eep. 433 ; 32 L. S. M. C. 35.) Receiving from a receiver. — If A. in the absence of B. feloniously receives stolen property from the thief and sub- sequently delivers it to 0. who knowingly receives it, both may be jointly indicted for feloniously receiving it under sect. 93 and 94; (^Re Rearden, 14 L. T. Kep. 449.) 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 96. 81 93. Whenever any property whatsoeTer shall Separate have been stolen, taken, extorted, obtained, ^ay ta™ embezzled, or otherwise disposed of in such a included in manner as to amount to a felony, either at indictment common law or by virtue of this act, any number '° "'^ of receivers at different times of such property, the principal or of any part or parts thereof, may be charged with substantive felonies in the same indictment, and may be tried together, notwithstanding that the principal felon shall not be included in the same indictment, or shall not be in custody or ^ amenable to justice. 94. If upon the trial of any two or more persons On an indicted for jointly receiving any property it shall JorVJJ^ay' be proved that one or more of such persons receiving, separately received any part or parts of such be'convioted property, it shall be lawful for the jury to convict, of separately '^ '^ ■'■,■:,. . , 1 J! ii -J receiving, upon such mdictment, such or the said persons as shall be proved to have received any part or parts of such property. 95. Whosoever shall receive any chattel, Beoelving, money, valuable security, or other property p^™p'|i'' whatsoever, the stealinff, taking, obtaining, con- tas been .. ' . . S', J.S; , ^' . guilty of a verting, or disposmg whereot is made a mis- misdemea- demeanor by this act, knowing the same to have '""■• been unlawfully stolen, taken, obtained, con- verted, or disposed of, shaU be guilty of a mis- demeanor, and may be indicted and convicted thereof, whether the person guilty of the prin- cipal misdemeanor shall or shall not have been previously convicted thereof, or shall or shall not be amenable to justice ; and every such receiver, being convicted thereof, shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without E 3 82 Larceny, Sfc. Act, solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Eeeeiver 96. Whosoever shall receive any chattel. where triable. money, valuable security, or other property ■whatsoever, knowing the same to have been feloniously or unlawfully stolen, taken, obtained, converted, or disposed of, may, whether charged as an accessory after the fact to the felony, or with a substantive felony, or with a misdemeanor only, be dealt with, indicted, tried, and punished in any county or place in which be shall have or shall have had any such property in his pos- session, or in any county or place in which the party guilty of the principal felony or misde- meanor may by law be tried, in the same manner as such receiver may be dealt with, indicted, tried and punished in the county or place where he actually received such property. Eeoeiveraof 97. Where the stealing or taking of any property, property whatsoever is by this act punishable on where the J^ "^ -^ . J cc original summary conviction, either for every offence, or otEenM iB for tiie first and second offence only, or for the on summary first offence only, any person who shall receive oonyiotion. ^^^ sash, property, knowing the same to be unlawfully come by, shall, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, be liable, for every first, second, or subsequent offence of receiving, to the same forfeiture and punishment to which a person guilty of a first, second, or subsequent offence of stealing or taking such property is by this act made liable. Principals in 98. In case of every felony punishable under de^ee an d *^^^ ^°* ^^®^y principal in the second degree, and accessories, every accessory before the fact, shall be punishable in the same manner as the principal in the first degree is by this act punishable; and every ac- cessory after the fact to any felony punishable under this act (except only a receiver of stolen 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 96. 83 property) shall, on conviction, be liable, at tlie discretion of tte court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary con- finement ; and every person who shall aid. Abettors in abet, counsel, or procure the commission of any ™^|fnJrg misdemeanor punishable under this act shall be liable to be indicted and punished as a principal offender. 99. Whosoever shall aid, abet, counsel, or pro- Abettors in cure the commission of any offence which is by ™™8°^abie this act punishable on summary conviction, either on summary for every time of its commission, or for the first ''°°^"' '™' and second time only, or for the first time only, shall, on conviction before a justice of the peace, be liable, for every first, second, or subsequent offence of aiding, abetting, counselling, or pro- curing, to the same forfeiture and punishment to which a person guilty of a first, second, or subse- quent offence as a principal offender is by this act made liable. As to restitution and recovery of stolen property : 100. If any person guilty of any such felony The owner or misdemeanor as is mentioned in this act, in p'"^',™ stealing, taking, obtaining, extorting, embezzhng, proBeouHng convertmg, or disposmg oi, or in knowmgiy re- receiver to ceiving any chattel, money, valuable security, or ^^au have other property whatsoever, shall be indicted for reatitiition such offence, by or on thfe behalf of the owner of pe^^.'™" the property, or his executor or administrator, and convicted thereof, in such case the property shall be restored to the owner or his representa- tive ; and in every case in this section aforesaid the court before whom any person shall be tried for any such felony or misdemeanor shall have power to award from time to time writs of resti- tution, for the said property, or to order the restitution thereof in a summary manner: pro- 84 Larceny, (J'C. Act, ProTision as vided, that if it stall appear before any award or Tndi neg"° order made tHat any valuable security shall have tiabie aecu- been hond fide paid or discharged by some person "'"^s- or -body corporate Jiable to the payment thereof, or being a negotiable instrument shall have been hond fide taken or received by transfer or delivery, by some person or body corporate, for a just and valuable consideration, without any notice or without any reasonable cause to suspect that the same had by any felony or misdemeanor been stolen, taken, obtained, extorted, embezzled, con- verted, or disposed of, in such case the court shall not award or order the restitution of such Not to apply security : provided also, that nothing in this tiooH'of "' section contained shall apply to the case of any bank^r^' & prosecution of any trustee, banker, merchant, attorney, factor, broker, or other agent intrusted with the possession of goods or documents of title to goods for any misdemeanor against this act. Taking a 101. Whosoever shall corruptly take any money MpingtcT or reward, directly or indirectly, under pretence *» toP"™'^ or upon account of helping any person to any property chattel, money, valuable security, or other pro- MnSng the ps''^'}' whatsoever which shall by any felony or offender to misdemeanor have been stolen, taken, obtained, extorted, embezzled, converted, or disposed of, as in this act before mentioned, shall (unless he shall have used all due diligence to cause the offender to be brought to trial for the same) be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of eighteen years, with or without whipping. Advertising 102. "Whosoevcr shall publicly advertise a a reward for ^ ■' 24 Sr 25 Vict. cap. 96. 85 reward for the return of any property whatsoever *° ™'a"' which shall have been stolen or lost, and shall in property, so. such advertisement use any words purporting that no questions will be asked, or shall make use of any words in any public advertisement purporting that a reward will be given or paid for any pro- perty which shall have been stolen or lost, without seizing or making any inquiry after the person producing such property, or shall promise or offer in any such public advertisement to return to any pawnbroker or other person who may have bought or advanced money by way of loan upon any property stolen or lost the money so paid or advanced, or any other sum of money or reward for the return of such property, or shall print or publish any such advertisement, shall forfeit the sum of fifty pounds for every such offence to any person who will sue for the same by action of debt, to be recovered, with full costs of suit. As to apprehension of offenders, and other proceedings : 103. Any person found committing any offence A person in • 1, 1-1 uv ■ J- i i the act of punishable, either upon indictment or upon sum- committing mary conviction by virtue of this act, except only mJy°te ap^ the offence of angling in the daytime, may be prebended immediately apprehended without a warrant by warrant any person, and forthwith taken, together vnth such property, if any, before some neighbouring justice of the peace, to be dealt with according to law ; and if any credible witness shall prove upon oath before a iustice of the peace a reasonable a justice, , J ii i 1 • 1 • upon good cause to suspect that any person has m his posses- grounds of sion or on his premises any property whatsoever p^PglJ™^ on or with respect to which any offence, punish- oatii, may able either upon indictment or upon summary f^,,-^ conviction by virtue of this act, shall have warrant. been committed, the justice may grant a warrant to search for such property as in the case of . stolen goods ; and any person to whom any pro- ^°^^™™ 86 Larceny, ^c. Act, stolen pro- perty shall be offered to be sold, pawned, or Sffered^miy delivered, if lie sliall tave reasonable cause to Bcize tbe suspect that any such, offence has been committed pfiny^offei- ^^ ^^ ^^^ respect to such property, is hereby authorised, and, if in his power, is required to apprehend and forthwith to take before a justice of the peace the party offering the same, together with such property, to be dealt with according to law. A person 104. Any constable or peace ofiScer may take loiu-riug at Jji^q custody, without warrant, any person whom suspected of he shall find lying or loitering in any highway, agatasuhis y'lrd, or other place, during the night, and whom act may be he shall have good cause to suspect of having heu'ieil. committed, or being about to commit, any felony, against this act, and shall take such person, as soon as reasonably may be, before a justice of the peace, to be dealt with according to law. Mode of 105. Where any person shall be charged on oompeiimg ^^e oath of a credible witness before any justice ance ot per- of the peace with any offence punishable on suna- aWemsum- i^^ry oonviction under this act, the justice may mary cou- summon the person charged to appear at a time and place to be named in such summons, and if he shall not appear accordingly, then (upon proof of the due service of the summons upon such person, by delivering the same to him personally, or by leaving the same at his usual place of abode), the justice may either proceed to hear and deter- mine the case ex parte, or issue his warrant for apprehending such person, and bringing him before himself or some other justice of the peace ; or the justice before whom the charge shall be made may (if he shall so think fit), without any previous summons (unless where otherwise specially directed), issue such warrant, and the justice before whom the person charged shall appear or be brought shall proceed to hear and determine the case. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 87 106. Every sum of money wWoli shall be for- Application felted on any summary conviction for the value a"a penar' of any property stolen or taken, or for the amount ties on of any injury done (sucli value or amount to be conviotiona assessed in each case by. the convicting justice), shall be paid to the party aggrieved, except where he is unknown, and in that case such sum shall be applied in the same manner as a penalty ; and every sum which shall be imposed as a penalty by any justice of the peace, whether in addition to such value or amount or otherwise, shall be paid and applied in the same manner as other penalties recoverable before justices of the peace are to be paid and applied in cases where the statute imposing the same contains no direc- tion for the payment thereof to any person : provided, that where several persons shall join in Proviso the commission of the same offence, and shall ^y|rti per- upon conviction thereof, each be adjudged to sons join in forfeit a sum equivalent to the value of the pro- of same perty or to the amount of the injury, in every °^®°°°- such case no further sum shall be paid to the party aggrieved than such value or amount ; and the remaining sum or sums forfeited shall be applied in the same manner as any penalty im- posed by a justice of the peace is hereinbefore directed to be applied. 107.(^°) In every case of a summary convic- if a person tion under this act, where the sum which shall cmvioted^ be forfeited for the value of the property stolen ^^"'"^^"'"t^g or taken, or for the amount of the injury done, justioe may or which shaU be imposed as a penalty by the "ommithim. justice, shall not be paid either immediately after the conviction, or within such period as the Soaie of im- justice shall at the time of the conviction appoint, p"^™™'^" ■ («) The 28 & 29 Vict. c. 127 (" The Small Penalties Act, 1865,") contains provisions limiting the alternative punish, ment of imprisonment upon a graduated scale: (seethe statute, post.^ 88 Larceny, ^c. Act, the convioting justice (unless where otherwise specially directed) may commit the offender to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be imprisoned only,, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour, according to the discretion of the justice, for any term not exceeding two months, where the amount of the sum forfeited or of the penalty imposed, or of both (as the case may be), together with the costs, shall not exceed five pounds, and for any term not exceeding four months, where the amount, with costs, shall not exceed ten pounds, and for any term not exceed- ing six months in any other case, the commit- ment to be determinable in each of the' cases aforesaid upon payment of the amount and costs. Justice may 108. Where any person shall be summarily ae°offenaer oonvicted before a justice of the peace of any incei-tain offence against this act, and it shall be a first oases. . conviction, the justice may, if he shall so think fit, discharge the offender from his conviction, upon his making such satisfaction to the party aggrieved for damages and costs, or either of them, as shall be ascertained by the justice. A summary 109. In case any person convicted of any BhaiYbe"!" offsnce punishable upon summary conviction by bar to any virtue of this act shall have paid the sum ad- °eeain^™or ju-'lged to be paid, together with costs, under the same such conviction, or shall have received a remis- sion thereof from the Crown, or from the Lord Lieutenant or other chief governor in Ireland, or shall have suffered the imprisonment awarded for non-payment thereof, or the imprisonment ad- judged in the first instance, or shall have been so discharged from his conviction by any justice as aforesaid, in every such case he shall be released from all further or other proceedings for the same cause. 24 ^ 25 Vict, cap. 96. 89 110.(^^) In all cases where the sum adjudged Appeal to be paid on any summary conviction shall exceed five pounds, or the imprisonment adjudged shall exceed one month, or the conviction shall - take place before one justice only, any person who shall think himself aggrieved by any such conviction may appeal to the next court of general or quarter sessions which shall be holden not less than twelve days after the day of such conviction for the county or place wherein the cause of complaint shall have arisen ; provided, that such person shall give to the complainant a notice in writing of such appeal, and of the cause and matter thereof, within three days after such ' conviction, and seven clear days at the least before such sessions, and shaU also either remain in custody until the sessions, or shall enter into a recognisance, with two sufficient sureties, before a justice of the peace, conditioned personally to appear at the said sessions and to try such appeal, and to abide the judgment of the court there- upon, and to pay such costs as shall be by the court awarded ; or if such appeal shaU be against any conviction, whereby only a penalty or other sum of money shall be adjudged to be paid, shall deposit with the clerk of the convicting justice such a sum of money as such justice shall deem to be sufficient to cover the sum so adjudged to be paid, together with the costs of the conviction (20) This appeal clause contains a novel and a very im- portant feature in connection with appealing in cases where the appeal is against a conviction, whereby only a penalty or other sura of money shall be adjudged to be paid, namely, the depositing by the appellant with the clerk of the con- victing justice of such a sum of money as such justice shall deem to be sufBoient to cover the sum so adjudged to be paid, together with the costs of the conviction and the costs of the appeal. Thus, in such a case, instead either of re- maining in prison or of entering into a reoogriisance with sureties, the appellant may deposit a sum of money sufficient to cover the penalty and the estimated costs of the convic- tion and the appeal. 90 Larceny, Sfc. Act, and the cost? of the appeal ; and upon such notice being given, and suoh recognisance being entered into, or such deposit being made, the justice • before whom such recognisance shall be entered into, or such deposit shall be made, shall liberate such person if in custody ; and the court at such sessions shall hear and detennine the matter of the appeal, and shall make such order therein, with or without costs to either party, as to the court shall seem meet, and in case of the dis- missal of the appeal or the affirmance of the con- viction shall order and adjudge the offender to be punished according to the conviction, and to pay such costs as shall be awarded, and shall, if necessary, issue process for enforcing such judg- ment ; and in any case where after any such deposit shall have been made as aforesaid the conviction shall be affirmed, the court may order the sum thereby adjudged to be paid, together with the costs of the conviction and the costs of the appeal, to be paid out of the money deposited, and the residue thereof, if any, to be repaid to the party convicted ; and in any case where after any such deposit the conviction shall be quashed, the court shall order the money deposited to be repaid to the party convicted ; and in every case where any conviction shall be quashed on appeal as aforesaid the clerk of the peace, or other proper officer, shall forthwith endorse on the con- viction a memorandum that the sam.e has been so quashed ; and whenever any copy or certificate of such conviction shall be made, a copy of such memorandum shall be added thereto, and shall be sufficient evidence that the conviction has been quashed in every case where such copy or cer- tificate would be sufficient evidence of such conviction. Norer-' HI- -^o such conviction, or adjudication made tioran, &o. on appeal therefrom, shall be quashed for want of 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 91 form, or be removed by certiorari into any of Her Majesty's superior courts of record ; and no war- rant of commitment shall be held void by reason of any defect therein, provided it be therein alleged that the party has been convicted, and there be a good and valid conviction to sustain the same. 112. Every justice of the peace before whom oonvietion any person shall be convicted of any offence ^}^ ^ . . , ,-1 . i. 1 n ( ., 1 . . retumea t( against tms act shall transmit the conviction to the quartei the next court of general or quarter sessions ' which shall be holden for the county or place wherein the offence shall have been committed, there to be kept by the proper officer among the records of the court ; and upon any information against any person for a subsequent offence, a copy of such conviction, certified by the proper officer of the court, or proved to be a true copy, shall be sufficient evidence to prove a conviction for the former offence, and the conviction shall be presumed to have been unappealed against until the contrary be shown. 113.(^) All actions and prosecutions to bevenne, in commenced against any person for anything done P^^sding in pursuance of this act shall be laid and tried in sons acting the county where the fact was committed, and aefc°'""° shall be commenced within six months after ('■'') Notice of action — Larceny Act. — To entitle a defen- dant to notice of action under the 24 & 25 Vict. o. 96, it is not sufficient that he should have a mere suspicion that the plaintiff had been attempting to commit a crime, but he must honestly believe that he was found committing such an offence as is mentioned in the statute. The defendant was disturbed at night by a noise which he ascribed to some person trying his back door. He shouted " Thieves," from his bedroom window, and when he got down to his front door he found the plaintiff collared by a policeman, and he immediately gave him into custody. Held, in an action for false imprisonment, that these circumstances were not sufficient to entitle tlie defendant to notice of action : (Neaie v. ffart, 18 L. T. Bep 292.) 92 Larceny, 4rc. Act. Notice of actioii. General Stealers of property in one part of the Uuited Kingdom who Uave the same in any other part of the United Kingdom the fact committed, and not otherwise ; and notice in writing of such, action and of the cause thereof shall be given to the defendant one month at least before the commencement of the action ; and in any such action the defendant may plead the general issue, and give this act and the special matter in evidence, at any trial to be had thereupon ; and no plaintiff shall recover in any such action if tender of sufficient amends shall have been made before such action brought, or if a sufficient sum of money shall have been paid into court after such action brought, by or on behalf of the defendant ; and if a verdict shall pass for the defendant, or the plaintiff shall become nonsuit, or discontinue any such action after issue joined, or if, upon demurrer or other- wise, judgment shall be given against the plaintiff, the defendant shall recover his full costs as between attorney and client, and have the like remedy for the same as any defendant has by law in other cases ; and though a verdict shall be given for the plaintiff in any such action, such plaintiff shall not have costs against the defen- dant unless the judge before whom the trial shall be shall certify his approbation of the action. As to other matters : 114.('''*) If any person shall have in his posses- sion in any one part of the United Kingdom any chattel, money, valuable security, or other pro- perty whatsoever, which he shall have stolen or otherwise feloniously taken in any other part of the United Kingdom, he may be dealt with, in- dicted, tried, and punished for larceny or theft in (2«) Transmission of property. — A watch was stolen in Liverpool, and Bent with other things by railway to a re- ceiver in Middlesex. Held, that the thief was triable in Middlesex, although there was no evidence that he had left Liverpool ; (^Reg. v. Rogers and others. 18 L. T. Rep. 414 : L. Eep. 1 Or. Oas. Bes. 136.) 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 96. 93 that part of the United Kingdom where he shall maybe tried so have such property, in the same manner as if fehta^n"tha,t he had actually stolen or taken it in that part ; and par' of the if any person in any one part of the United King- Khlg hop oast, bam, storehouse, granary, hovel, shed, or buuding,™!: fold, or to any farm building, or to any building or erection used in farming land, or in carrying on any trade or manufacture or any branch thereof, whether the same shall then be in the possession of the offender or in the possession of any other person, with intent thereby to injure or defraud any person, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in ,penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or with- out solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 4. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously setting a-e set fire to any station, engine house, warehouse, ^jt'staHon. or other building belonging or appertaining to any railway, port, dock, or harbour, or to any canal or other navigation, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the dis- cretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude (') TTnder this section it was lield that where the defen- dants had made a iire in several places on the floor of an unfinished building intended to be used vrhen finished as a dwelling house, they could not be convicted upon counts charging the setting fire to a house : QReg. v. EdgeU and others, 11 Cox Crim, Cas. 132. Lush, J.) 102 Malicious Injuries to Property Act, for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or*without hard labour, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or with- out whipping. SetHng Are 5. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously ^^xiins'^ set fire to any building other than such as are in this act before mentioned, belonging to the Queen, or to any county, riding, division, city, borough, poor-law union, parish, or place, or belonging to any university, or college or hall of any university, or to any inn of court, or devoted or dedicated to public use or ornament, or erected or maintained by pubUc subscription or contribution, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for hfe or for any term not less than three years, — or to be impriaoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and, if a male under the age of six- teen years, with or without whipping. Setting flre 6. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously buSSngs. s^* ^^ *° ^"ly building other than such as are in this act before mentioned shall be guilty of felony, and beitig convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceediog two years, with or with- out hard labour, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Setting flre 7. Whosoever shall imlawfully and maliciously Inf buHdtag s^* ^^ *° ^y matter or thing, being in, against, the setting or under any building, under such circumstances is felony. '° tli^t iE the buUding were thereby set flre to the offence would amount to felony, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be Uable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal 24 ^ 25 Vict, cap. 97. 103 servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen and not less than three years,^-or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or with- out hard labour, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 8. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously Attempting by any overt act attempt to set fire to any build- JJifi^'n™ *° ing, or any matter or thing in the last preceding section mentioned, under such circumstances that if the same were thereby set fire to the offender would be guilty of felony, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for any term not exceeding fourteen and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and vrith or without solitary confine- ment, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Injuries Jy explosive Substances to Buildings and Goods therein. 9. Whosoever shall unlawfiiUy and maliciously. Destroying by the explosion of gunpowder or other explosive ordamaging substance, destroy, throw down, or damage the gunpowder, whole or any part of any dweUiag house, any per- Sg^"^^™ son being therein, or of any building whereby the therein. life of any person shall be endangered, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 10. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously Attempting place or throw in, into, upon, under, against, or near {," naing"^^ any building- any gunpowder or other explosive with gun-. 104 Malicious Injuries to ProjpeHy Act, substance, witli intent to destroy or damage any building, or any engine, macliinery, working tools, fixtures, goods or chattels, shall, whether or not any explosion take place, and whether or not any damage be caused, be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceed- ing two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Injuries to Buildings hy Rioters, ^e. EioterB H- If ^.ny persons riotously and tumultuously demoitahing assembled together to the disturbance of the buudin'g, &0. pubUc peace shall unlawfully and with force demolish, or pull down or destroy, or begin to demolish, pull down, or destroy, any church, chapel, meeting house, or other place of Divine worship, or any house, stable, coach-house, out- house, warehouse, office, shop, mill, malthouse, hop-oast, bam, granary, shed, hovel, or fold, or any building or erection used ia farming land, or in carrying on any trade or manufacture or any branch thereof, or any building other than such as are in this section before mentioned, belonging to the Queen, or to any county, riding, division, city, borough, poor-law union, parish, or place, or belonging to any university, or col- lege or haU of any university, or to any inn of court, or devoted or dedicated to public use or ornament, or erected or maintained by pubhc subscription or contribution, or any machinery, whether fixed or movable, prepared for or em- ployed in any manufacture or in any branch thereof, or any steam engine or other engine for sinking, working, ventilating, or draining any mine, or any staith, building, or erection used 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 97. 105 in conducting the business of any mine, or any bridge, waggonway, or trunk for conveying mine- rals from any mine, every sucli offender shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years,^-or to be impri- soned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without soli- tary confinement. ■ 12. If any persons, riotously and tumultuously Eiotera assembled together to the disturbance of the '°i"dta^ public peace, shall unlawfully and with force maohine'ry, injure or damage any such church, chapel, meet- "' ing house, place of Divine worship, house, stable, coach-house, outhouse, warehouse, ofiSce, shop, mUl, malthouse, hop-oast, bam, granary, shed, hovel, fold, building, erection, machinery, engine, staith, bridge, waggonway, or trunk, as is in the last preceding section mentioned, every such offender shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal ser- vitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour : provided, that if upon the trial of any person for any felony in the last preceding section mentioned the jury shall not be satisfied that such person is guilty thereof, but shall be satisfied that he is guilty of any offence in this section mentioned, then the jury may find him guilty thereof, and he may be punished accordingly. Injuries to Buildings by Tenants. 13. Whosoever, being possessed of any dwell- Tenants of ing house or other building, or part of any dwell- mSutiiy ing house or other building held for any term of ^jij^b F 3 106 Malicious Injuries to Property Act, years or other less term, or at will, or held over after the termination of any tenancy, shall unlaw- fully and maliciously pull down or demolish, or begin to pull down or demolish, the same or any part thereof, or shall unlawfully and maliciously pull down or sever from the freehold any fixture being fixed in or to such dwelling house or build- ing, or part of such dwelling house or building, shaU be guilty of a misdemeanor. Injuries to Manufactures, Machinery, SfC. DeBtroying 14. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- proces?of ciously cut, break, or destroy, or damage with manutac- intent to destroy or to render useless, any goods Ehi'nery" or article of silk, woollen, linen, cotton, hair. *<=• mohair, or alpaca, or of any one or more of those materials mixed with each other or mixed vrith any other material, or any framework-knitted piece, stocking, hose, or lace, being in the loom or frame, or on any machine or engine, or on the rack or tenters, or in any stage, process or progress of manufacture, or shall unlawfully or maliciously cut, break, or destroy, or damage with intent to destroy or to render useless, any warp or shute of silk, woollen, linen, cotton, hair, mohair, or alpaca, or of any one or more of those materials mixed with each other, or mixed with any other material, or shall unlawfully and mali- ciously cut, break, or destroy, or damage with intent to destroy or render useless, any loom, frame, machine, engine, rack, tackle, tool, or im- plement, whether fixed or movable, prepared for or employed in carding, spinning, throwing, weaving, fulling, shearing, or otherwise manufacturing or preparing any such goods or articles, or shall by force enter into any house, shop, building, or place, with intent to commit any of the offences in this section mentioned, shaU be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 97. 107 penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, witli or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confine- ment, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 15.(2) Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- Destroying ciously cut, break, or destroy, or damage with ™^r manS. intent to destroy or to render useless, any machine faotares. or engine, whether fixed or movable, used or machines, intended to be used for sowing, reaping, mowing, *"■ threshing, ploughing, or draining, or for perform- ing any other agricultural operation, or any machine or engiae, or any tool or implement, whether fixed or movable, prepared for or em- ployed in any manufacture whatsoever (except tiie manufacture of silk, wooUen, linen, cotton, hair, mohair, or alpaca goods, or goods of any one or more of those materials mixed with each other or mixed vdth any other material, or any C) Every indictment for felony, whether it be a felony at common law or by statute, mnfit allege that the act which forms the subject matter of the indictment was done "feloniously;" where, therefore, upon an indictment under this section the allegation was that the defendant "did unlawfully and maliciously damage with intent to destroy certain machines," omitting to allege that it was done " feloniously," it was held that the indictment was bad : (Reg. V. Ch-ay, Leigh & Cave, 365 i 9 Cox Crim. Cas. 417 ; 33L. J. M. 0. 78.) Damaging machine with intent to render it useless. — The working parts of a steam threshing machine were designedly screwed too tight, which prevented it from working; and the plug of the pump was designedly taken out, and replaced with the wrong side up, so that no water could pass from the pump to the boiler; and the pipe leading from the plug to the boiler was stopped up by a piece of stick, and the machine was thus rendered temporarily useless andexposed to danger. But when the working parts of the engine were loosened, the plug properly replaced, and the stick taken from the pipe, the engine was as good as before these acts were done. Held, that these acts constituted damage to the machine within the fifteenth section of the 24 & 25 Vict. o. 97 : QReg. v. Msher, 13 L. T. Rep. 380 ; 35 L. J. M. C. 57.) Setting fire to crops of com, &c. 108 Malicious Injuries to Froperiy Act, framework-knitted piece, stocking, tose, or lace), shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. I Injuries to Com, Trees, and vegetable Productions. 16. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- ciously set fire to any crop of hay, grass, com, grain, or pulse or of any cultivated vegetable produce, whether standing or cut down, or to any part of any wood, coppice, or plantation of trees, or to any heath, gorse, furze, or fern, where- soever the same may be growing, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years, and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Netting are 17. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- corn!'ite! "' ciously set fire to any stack of com, grain, pulse, tares, hay, straw, haulm, stubble, or of any culti- vated vegetable produce, or of furze, gorse, heath, fern, turf, peat, coals, charcoal, wood, or bark, or to any steer of wood or bark, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or with- 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 97. 109 out hard labour, and with or without soKtary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sis- teen years, with or without whipping. 18. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously Attempting by any overt act attempt to set fire to any such '° ^' "''^ '°, , " ^ . , '■ ^ J ftny crops oi matter or tmng as m either of the last two pre- com, &o. or ceding sections mentioned, under such circum- or s'telr^'"'"'' stances that if the same were thereby set fire to the offender would be, under either of such sections, guilty of felony, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 19. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously DeBtroying cut or otherwise destroy any hopbinds growing '"'pI'""Jb- on poles in any plantation of hops shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 20. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maU- DeBtroying ciously cut, break, bark, root up, or otherwise "jg™''^'''* destroy or damage the whole or any part of shrubs, &a. i_ T 1 i_ J J to the value any tree, saplmg, or shrub, or any underwood, of more than growing in any park, pleasure ground, garden, ^f^^^J"^^^^ orchard, or avenue, or in any ground adjoining ground, te. or belonging to amy dwelling house (in case the 110 Malicious Injuries to Property Act, amount of the injuiy done shall exceed the sum of one pound), shaU be guilty of felony, and being conyioted thereof Shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept ia penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confine- ment, and, if a male imder the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Destroying 21. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously trees™*^'"^ cut, break, bark, root up, or otherwise destroy or Bhraba, Sus. damage the whole or any part of any tree, sapling, of more than Or shrub. Or any underwood, growing elsewhere 5(. growing than in any park, pleasure ground, garden, elsewtiere , . J r ' r & ' _&_ ' tlian in a Orchard, or avenue, or m any ground adjommg to ground^te. °^ belonging to any dwelling house (in case the amount of injury done shall exceed the sum of five pounds), shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confine- ment, and, if a male under the age of sixteen ■years, with or without whipping. Damaging 22. Whosoever shall imlawfuUy and mali- wlieresoever ciously cut, break, bark, root up, or otherwise growing, to destroy or damage the whole or any part of any of u tree, sapling, or shrub, or any underwood, where- soever the same may be growing, the injury done being to the amount of one shilling at the least, shall, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, at the discretion of the justice, either be committed to the common gaol or house of conrection, there to be imprisoned only, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour for any term not exceeding three months, or else shall forfeit and pay, over and above the amount of the injury done, such sum of money, not exceeding five 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 97. Ill pounds as to tlie justice shall seem meet ; and Second whosoever, having been convicted of any such °"''°°»- offence, either against this or any former act of Parliament, shall afterwards commit any of the said offences in this section before mentioned, and shall be convicted thereof in like manner, shall for such second offence be committed to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be kept to hard labour for such term, not exceeding twelve months, as the convicting justice shall think fit ; and whosoever, having been twice con- Third victed of any such offence (whether both or either of o"^""^- such convictions shall have taken place before or after the passing of this act), shall afterwards commit any of the said offences in this section before mentioned, shall be guilty of a mis- dem.eanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable at the discretion of the court, to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 23. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- Destroying oiously destroy, or damage with intent to destroy, Te|e'abie'"^ any plant, root, fruit, or vegetable production, production ■' f . I ,°-, ^ jina garden, growmg m any garden, orchard, nursery ground, hothouse, greenhouse, or conservatory, shall, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, at the discretion of the Justice, either be cominitted to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be imprisoned only, or to be imprisoned and , kept ;to hard labour for any term not exceeding six months, or else shaU forfeit and pay, over and above the amount of the injury done, such sum of money not exceeding twenty pounds as to the justice shall seem meet ; and whosoever, having second been convicted of any such offence, either against o«™<=«- this or any former act of Parliament, shall after- 112 Malicious Injuries to Property Act, wards commit any of the said offences in this section before mentioned, shall be guUty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the couit, to be kept in penal servi- tude for the term of three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age or sixteen years, with or without whipping. DeBtroying, 24. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- fable^pro- cionsly destroy, or damage with intent to destroy, ductiona not any cultivated root or plant used for the food of iardmf, "c. ^^'^ o' beast, or for medicine, or for distilling, or for dyeing, or for or in the course of any manu- facture, and growing in any land, open or in- closed, not being a garden, orchard, or nursery ground, shall, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, at the discretion of the justice, either be committed to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be inapiisoned only, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour, for any term not exceeding one month, or else shall forfeit and pay, over and above the amount of the injury done, such sum of money not ex- ceeding twenty shillings as to the justice shall seem meet, and in default of pajrment thereof, together with the costs, if ordered, shall be com- mitted as aforesaid for any term not exceeding Second One month, ' unless payment be sooner made ; and oftenoK whosoever, having been convicted of any such offence either against this or any former act of Parliament, shall afterwards commit any of the said offences in this section before mentioned, and shall be convicted thereof in like manner, shall be committed to the common gaol or house of correc- tion, there to be kept to hard labour for such term not exceeding six months as the convicting, justice shall think fit. 24 (?• 25 Vict. cap. 97. 113 Injuries to Fences. 25. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously Destroying, cut, break, throw down, or in anywise destroy any ^^^\^yi fence of any description whatsoever, or any wall, atue, or gate, stile, or gate, or any part thereof respectively, shall, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, for the first offence forfeit and pay, over and above the amount of the injury done, such sum of money not exceeding five pounds as to the justice shall seem meet ; and whosoever, having second been convicted of any such offence, either against off™i=e. this or any former act of Parliament, shall after- wards commit any of the said offences in this section before mentioned, and shall be convicted thereof in like manner, shall be committed to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be kept to hard labour for such term not exceeding twelve months as the convicting justice shall think fit. Injuries to Mines. 26. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously setting are set fire to any mine of coal, cannel coal, anthra- J^*a°°*' cite, or other mineral fuel, shaU be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitudfe for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or withput whipping. ^7. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- Attempting ciously by any overt act attempt to set fire to any ^^i^e. " mine, under such circumstances that if the mine were thereby set fire to the offender would be guilty of felony, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the dis- cretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude 114 Malicious Injuries to Property Act, for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than ttree years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with, or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confine- ment, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Oonveying 28. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- wMer into gig^giy cause any water to be conveyed or run into obstraoting any mine, or into any subterraneous passage com- ' ■ municating therewith, with intent thereby to destroy or damage such mine, or to hinder or delay the working thereof, or shall with the like intent unlawfully and maliciously pull down, fill up, or obstruct or damage, with intent to destroy, obstruct, or render useless, any airway, waterway, drain, pit, level, or shaft of or belonging to any mine, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years,-7-or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping : provided that this provision shall not extend to any damage committed under- ground by any owner of any adjoining mine in working the same, or by any person duly employed in such working. Damaging 29. Whosoever shaU unlawfully and mali- iSes, ciously pull down or destroy, or damage with Btaiths, intent to destroy or render useless, anv steam waggon- . j.i_ • J! • 1 • ■■ . r ways, ftc engine, or otner engine tor smking, draining, ven- Sin™'™® tilating, or working, or for in anywise assisting in sinking, draining, ventilating, or working any mine, or any appliance or apparatus in connection with any such steam or other engine, or any staith, building, or erection used in conducting the business of any mine, or any bridge, waggon- 24 #25 Vict. cap. 97. 115 way or trunk for conveying minerals from any mine, wlietlier such engine, staith, building, erection, bridge, waggonway, or trunk be com- pleted or in an unfinislied state, or stall unlaw- fully and maliciously stop, obstruct, or hinder the working of any such steam or other engine, or of any such appliance or apparatus as aforesaid, with intent thereby to destroy or damage any mine, or to hinder, obstruct, or delay the working thereof, or shall unlawfully and maliciously wholly or partially cut through, sever, break, or unfasten, or damage with intent to destroy or render useless, any rope, chain, or tackle, of whatsoever material the same shall be made, used in any mine, or in or upon any inclined plane, railway, or other way, or other work whatsoever, in anywise belonging or appertaining to or connected with or employed in any mine or the working or business thereof, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not ex- ceeding seven years and not less than three years, -^or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Injuries to Sea and River Banks, and to Works on Rivers, Canals, #c. 30. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- Destroying ciously break down or cut down or otherwise bant ot wall damage or destroy any sea bank or sea wall, or onanyeanai the bank, dam, or wall of or belonging to any river, canal, drain, reservoir, pool, or marsh, whereby any land or building shall be or shall be in danger of being overflowed or damaged, or shall unlawfully and maliciously throw, break, or cut down, level, undermine, or otherwise destroy, any quay, wharf, jetty, look, sluice, floodgate, weir, 116 Malicious Injuries to Property Act, tunnel, towing-path, drain, watercourse, or other work belonging' to any port, harbour, dock, or reservoir, or on or belonging to any navigable river or canal, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned fqr any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Kemoving 31. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- anyae'r"' oiously cut off, draw up, or remove any piles, bank, &o., or chalk, or other materials fixed in the ground, and damage°te> used for securing any sea bank, or sea wall, or the obstruotthe bank, dam, or wall of any river, canal, drain, navigation ' ' , J , ^ , , or a river or aqueduct, marsh, reservoir, pool, port, harbour, cana . dock, quay, wharf, jetty, or look, or shall unlaw- fully and maliciously open or draw up any flood- gate or sluice, or do any other injury or mischief to any navigable river or canal, with intent and so as thereby to obstruct or prevent the carrying on, completing, or maintaining the navigation thereof, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to. be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with, or without whipping. Injuries to Ponds. Breaking 32. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- dam°of'a ciously Cut through, break down, or otherwise fishery, &c., destroy the dam, floodgate, or sluice of any fish or poisoning pond, Or of any water which shall be private flsh. 24^25 Vict. cap. 97. 117 property, or in wMoli there shall be any private right of fishery, with intent thereby to take or destroy any of the fish in such pond or water, or so as thereby to cause the loss or destruction of any of the fish, or shall unlawfully and mali- ciously put any lime or other noxious material in any such pond or water, with intent thereby to destroy any of the fish that may then be or that may thereafter be put therein, or shall unlawfully and maliciously cut through, break down, or otherwise destroy the dam or floodgate of any mill pond, reservoir, or pool, shall be guilty of misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof .shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years, and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hai'd labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Injuries to Bridges, Viaducts, and Toll Bars. 33. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- injary to a ciously pull or throw down or in aii3rwise destroy bridge, any bridge (whether over any stream of water or ' not), or any viaduct or aqueduct, over or under which bridge, viaduct, or aqueduct, any highway, railway, or canal shall pass, or do any injury with intent and so as thereby to render such bridge, viaduct, or aqueduct, or the highway, railway, or canal passing over or under the same, or any part thereof, dangerous or impassable, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary con- finement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 118 Malicious Injuries to Property/ Act, DeBtroyinga 34. Whosoever shall unlawfiiUy and maliciously g"te toll throw down, level, or otherwise destroy, in whole house, &!. or in part, any turnpike gate or toU bar, or any wall, chain, rail, post, bar or other fence belonging to any turnpike gate or toU bar, or set up or erected to prevent passengers passing by without paying any toll directed to be paid by any act of Parhament relating thereto, or any house, building, or weighing engine erected for the better collection, ascertainment, or security of any such toU, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Injuries to Railway Carriages and Telegraphs. Placing 35. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maUciously on railway P^*' pl^cc, cast, or throw upon or across any raU- with intent way, any wood, stone, or other matter or thing, c? overthrow or shaU unlawfully and maliciously take up, re- any engine, move, or displace any raU, sleeper, or other matter or thing belonging to any railway, or shall un- lawfully and maliciously turn, move, or divert any points or other machinery belonging to any rail- way, or shall unlawfully and maUciously make or show, hide or remove any signal or light, upon or near to any railway, or shall unlawfully and maliciously do or cause to be done any other matter or thing, with intent in any of the oases aforesaid, to obstruct, upset, overthrow, injure, or destroy any engine, tender, carriage, or truck using such railway, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be Uable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exr ceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and if a male tinder the age of sixteen, with or without whipping. Obstructing 36. Whosoever, by any unlawful act, or by any eaS^ea^on "^^^ omission Or neglect, shall obstruct or cause raiiwoj's. to be obstructed any engine or carriage using any 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 97. 119 railwaj', or shall aid or assist therein, shall be guilty of a misdemeaiior, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 37. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maUciously injuriea to cut, breai, throw down, destroy, injure, or remove «ieotrio or any battery, machinery, wire, cable, post, or other SSaphs. matter or thing whatsoever, being part of or being used or employed in or about any electric or magnetic telegraph, or in the working thereof, or shall unlawfully and maliciously prevent or ob- struct in any manner whatsoever the sending, conveyance, or delivery of any communication by any such telegraph, shall be guilty of a misde- meanor, and being convicted thereof shall be hable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour : provided that if it shall appear to any justice, on the examination of any person charged with any offence against this section, that it is not expedient to the ends of justice that the same should be prosecuted by indictment, the justice may proceed summarily to hear and deter- mine the same, and the offender shall, on con- viction thereof, at the discretion of the justice, either be committed to the conmion goal or house of correction, there to be imprisoned only, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour, for any term not exceeding three months, or else shall forfeit and pay such sum of money not exceeding ten pounds as to the justice shall seem meet. 38. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maUciously, Attempt to hy any overt act, attempt to commit any of the "le^^apifa offences in the last preceding section mentioned, shall, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, at the discretion of the justice, either be committed to the common gaol or house of cor- 120 Malicious Injuries to Property Act, rection, ttere to be imprisoned only, or to be im- prisoned and kept to bard labour, for any term not exceeding three mpntbs, or else shall forfeit and pay such sum of money not exceeding ten pounds as to tbe justice shall seem meet. Injuries to Works of Art. Destroying 39. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously w rk™¥''rt "^^^^'oy °^ damage any book, manuscript, picture, in museums, print, statue, bust, or vase, or any other article or ito^OTin thing kept for the purposes of art, science, or public places literature, or as an object of curiosity, in any museum, gallery, cabinet, library, or other re- pository, which museum, gallery, cabinet, library, or other repository is either at all times or from time to time open for the admission of the public, or of any considerable number of persons to view the same, either by the permission of the pro- prietor thereof or by the pajrment of money before entering the same, or any picture, statue, monu- ment, or other memorial of the dead, painted glass, or other ornament, or work of art, in any church, chapel, meeting house, or other place of Divine worship, or in any building belonging to the Queen, or to any county, riding, division, city, borough, poor-law union, parish, or place, or to any university, or college or haU of any university, or to any inn of court, or in any street, square, churchyard, burial ground, public garden or ground, or any statue or monument exposed to public view, or any ornament, railing, or fence surrounding such statue or monument, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding six months, with or without hard labour, and, if a male under the age of six- teen years, with or without whipping : provided that nothing herein contained shall be deemed to affect the right of any person to recover, by action at law, dainages for the injury so committed. 24 cj- 25 Vict. cap. 97. 121 Injuries to Cattle and other Animals. 40. (^) WTiosoever shall milawfully and mali- EUimg or ciously kill, maim, or wound any cattle shall be Mttte"^ guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 41. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously Killing or kill, maim, or wound any dog, bird, beast, or other Sr"°^ ■animal, not being cattle, but being either the sub- animals, ject of larceny at common law, or being ordinarily kept in a state of confinement, or for any domestic pui'pose, shall, on conviction thereof before a justice of the peace, at the discretion of the justice, either be committed to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be imprisoned only, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour, for any term not exceeding six months, or else shall forfeit and pay, over and above the amount of injury done, such sum of money not exceeding twenty pounds as to the justice shall seem meet ; and whosoever having been convicted of any such Second offence shall afterwards commit any of the said ''*™°^- offences in this section before mentioned, and shall be convicted thereof in like maimer, shall be com- mitted to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be kept to hard labour for such term not 1; ■ (') Upon an indictment under this eectiou for wounding a gelding, the prieoner was convicted upon evidence which showed that the gelding had suffered a laceration of the roots of the tongue, which protruded, and a tearing of the mouth, which injuries might have been caused by a pull of the tongue by the hand, but there was no evidence to show that any other instrument than the hand had been used. Held that there was sufficient evidence of a wounding, and the conviction was affirmed : (Reg. v. Bullock, 37 L. J. M. C. 47 i Law Kep. 1 Grim. Gas. 116 ; 17 L. T. Eep. 616.) Q 122 Malicious Injuries to Property Act, Setting flre to a ship. Setting iire to BilipB to prejudice the owner or under- writers. Attempting to set fire to a vessel. exceeding twelve months as the convicting justice shall think fit. 42. Whosoever shall unlawihilly and maliciously set fire to, oast away, or in anywise destroy any ship or vessel, whether the same be complete or in an unfinished state, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, vrith or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 43. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- ciously set fire to, or cast away, or in anjrwise destroy any ship or vessel, with intent thereby to prejudice any owner or part owner of such ship or vessel, or of any goods on board the same, or any person that has underwritten or shall underwrite any policy of insurance upon such ship or vessel, or on the freight thereof, or upon any goods on board the same, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for ajiy term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 44. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- ciously, by any overt act, attempt to set fire to, cast away, or destroy any ship or vessel, under such circumstances that if the ship or vessel were thereby set fire to, cast away, or destroyed, the offender would be guilty of felony, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be ■24: cj-25 Vict. cap. 97. 123 liable, at the discretion of tlie coui't, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen and not less tlian three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, ■with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 45. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- Placing gun- ciously place or throw in, into, upon, against, or aTOssei^th near any ship or vessel any gunpowder or other intent to explosive substance, with intent to destroy or damage any ship or vessel, or any machinery, working tools, goods, or chattels, shall, whether or not any explosion take place, and whether or not any injury be effected, be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal ser- vitude for any term not exceeding fourteen and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without soli- tary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 46. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- Damaging ciously damage, otherwise than by fire, gun- ^Betb^n'^' powder, or other explosive substance, any ship or ty Are- vessel, whether complete or in an unfinished state, with intent to destroy the same or render the same useless, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for amy term not exceeding two years, vnth or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of six- teen years, with or without whipping. 47. Whosoever shall unlawfully mask, alter. Exhibiting or remove any light or signal, or unlawfully J^*^^^ ''S^^^'^' »2 marks. 124 Malicious Injuries to Property Act, exhibit any false light or signal, with intent to bring any ship, vessel, or boat into danger, or shall tinla-wfully and maliciously do anything tending to the immediate loss or destruction of any ship, vessel, or boat, and for which no punishment is hereinbefore provided, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life, or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years,' with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of six- teen years, with or without whipping. Kemovingor 48. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- bnoyranl piously cut away, cast adrift, remove, alter, other sea deface, sink, or destroy, or shall unlawfully and maliciously do any act with intent to cut away, cast adrift, remove, alter, deface, sink, or destroy, or shall in any other manner unlawfully and maliciously injure or conceal any boat, buoy, buoy rope, perch, or mark used or intended for the guidance of seamen or the purpose of navi- gation, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof, shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three yearS, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Destroying 49. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mah- rnr^rtides oiously destroy any part of any ship or vessel belonging which shall be in distress, or wrecked, ' stranded, or cast on snore, or any goods, merchandise, or articles of any kind belonging to such ship or vessel, shall be guUty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of 24 Sf 25 Vict. cap. 97. 125 tte court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen and not less tlian three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, witli or without bard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. Sending Letters threatening to bum or destroy. 50. Whosoever shall send, deliver, or utter, or Sending directly or indirectly cause to be received, know- Ih^latening ing the contents thereof, any letter or writing to bum or threatening to bum or destro}' anjr house, bam, house? or other building, or any rick or stack of grain, tuiidinga, nay, or straw, or other agnouitural produce, or any grain, hay, or straw, or other agricultural produce in or under any building, or any ship or vessel, or to kill, maim, or wound any cattle, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding ten years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the a!ge of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Injuries not before provided for. 51.(*) Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- Persons ciously commit any damage, injury, or spoil to or ^S"?^ upon any real or personal property whatsoever, injuries not either of a public or private nature, for which no videdfor punishment is hereinbefore provided, the damage, thramoifnt injury, or spoil being to an amount exceeding five of s;. pounds, shall be guUty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any (<) Under this section evidence of damage committed at several times in the aggregate, bnt not at any one time ex- ceeding &l., will not sustain an indictment : (Reg. v. Williams, 9 Oox Crim. 0»a. 338, Ir.) 126 Malicious Injuries to Property Act, term not exceeding two years, with, or without hard labour ; and in case any such offence shall be committed between the hours of nine of the clock in the evening and six of the clock in the next morning, shaU be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding five years and not less than three, or to be imprisoned for any term not ex- ceeding two years, with or without hard labour. Persona 52. Whosoever shall wilfully or maliciously d°am?^ftef commit any damage, injury, or spoil to or upon any pro- any real or personal property whatsoever, either case not ""^ of a public or private nature, for which no previously punishment is hereinbefore provided, shall, on provided for, ^ . .f J ,t maybe conviction thereof before a justice oi the peace oTflne'df' ^* *^® discretion 'of the justice, either be com- and com- mitted to the common gaol or house of correction, fusUce to * there to be imprisoned only, or to be imprisoned Batio™ot °' ^^^ ■'^®P* *° ■'^^'^'^ labour, for any term not ex- exoeedtog SI. ceeding two months, or else shall forfeit and pay such sum of money not exceeding five pounds as to the justice shall seem meet, and also such further sum. of money as shall appear to the justice to be a reasonable compensation for the damage, injury, or spoil so committed, not ex- Appiication ceeding the sum of five pounds ; which last- awarded™^^ mentioned sum of money shall, in the case of private property, be paid to the party aggrieved ; and in the case of property of a public nature, or wherein any public right is concerned, the money shall be applied in the same manner as every penalty imposed by a justice of the peace under this act ; and if such sums of money, to- gether with costs (if ordered), shall not be paid either immediately after the conviction, or within such period as the justice shall at the time of the conviction appoint, the justice may commit the offender to the common gaol or house of cor- rection, there to be imprisoned only, or to be 24 (!• 25 Vict. cap. 97. 127 imprisoned and kept to hard laboiir, as the justice shall think fit, for any term not exceeding two months, unless such sums and costs be sooner paid : provided that nothing herein contained Not to shall extend to any case where the party acted oertSa cases under a fair and reasonable supposition that he herein had a right to do the act complained of, nor to ""^ any trespass, not being wilful and malicious, committed in hunting, fishing, or in the pursuit of game, but that every such trespass shall be punishable in the same manner as if this act had not passed. 53. The provisions in the last preceding gection Preceding contained shall extend to any person who shall extend tS wOfully or maliciously commit any injury to any trees, tree, sapling, shrub, or underwood, for which no punishment is hereinbefore provided. Making Gunpowder to commit Offences, and searching for the same. 54. Whosoever shall mate or manufacture, or Making or knowingly have in his possession, any gunpowder powdlrf &c.", or other explosive substance, or any dangerous or with intent , , .^ , . ** . ° . , to commit noxious tmng, or any machme, engine, mstru- any felony ment, or thing, with intent thereby or by means ^|^™°' '^'° thereof to commit, or for the purpose of enabling any other person to commit, any of the felonies in this act mentioned, shall be guilty of a mis- demeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without sohtary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 55. Any justice of the peace of any county or justicesmay place in which any machine, engine, implement, j.'^^^t°7oT or thing, or any gunpowder or other explosive, searohing dangerous, or noxious substance, is suspected to fo "auoh "' be made, kept, or carried for the purpose of gunpowder, 128 Malicious Injuries to Property Act, being used in committing any of the felonies vd this act mentioned, upon reasonable cause as- signed upon oatb by any person, may issue p. warrant under His hand and seal for searching in the daytime any house, mUl, magazine, store- house, warehouse, shop, cellar, yard, wharf, or other place, or any carriage, waggon, cart, shij, boat, or vessel, in which the same is suspected to be made, kept, or carried for such purpose as hereinbefore mentioned ; and every person acting in the execution of any such warrant shall have, for seizing, removing to proper places, and de- taining every such machine, engine, implement, and thing, and all such gunpowder, explosive, dangerous, or noxious substances found upon such search, which he shall have good cause to suspect to be intended to be used in committing any such offence, and the barrels, packages, cases, and other receptacles in which the same shall be, the same powers and protections which are given to persons searching for unlawful quantities of gun- powder under the warrant of a justice by the act passed in the session holden in the twenty-third and twenty-fourth years of the reign of Her present Majesty, chapter one hundred and thirty- nine, intituled "An Act to amend the Law con- cerning the making, keeping, and carriage of Gun- powder and Compositions of an explosive Nature, and concerning the manufacture, sale, and use of Fireworks." Other Matters. PrinoipalB 56. In the case of every felony punishable degraeTna"* under this act, every principal in the second acceBsorieg. degree, and every accessory before the fact, shall be punishable in the same manner as the principal in the first degree is by this act punishable ; and every accessory after the fact to any felony punishable under this act shall on conviction be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be im- 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 97. 129 prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement ; and every person who shall Abettors in aid, abet, counsel, or procure the commission ^l^^^^'^ of any misdemeanor punishable under this act shall be liable to be proceeded against, indicted, and punished as a principal offender. 57. Any constable or peace officer may take a person into custody, without warrant, any person whom '°'^?'^j' he shall find lying or loitering in any highway, suspected of yard, or other place during the night, and whom againstThia he shall have good cause to suspect of having ?j<=t may committed or being about to commit any felony henffi! " against this act, and shall take such person as soon as reasonably may be before a justice of the peace, to be dealt with a« holden in the eleventh and twelfth years of Queen ii & i2Viot. Victdria, chapter forty-three, so far as no pro- ireiand"^ " vision is hereby made for any matter or thing under the which may be required to be done in the course J/'n*.^^ ^"" of such prosecution, and may be prosecuted in Ireland before two or more justices of the peace, or one metropolitan or stipendiary magistrate, in the manner directed by the act of the session holden in the fourteenth and fifteenth years of Queen Victoria, chapter ninety-three, or in such other manner as may be directed by any act that may be passed for like purposes, and all provisions contained in the said acts shall be applicable to such prosecutions in the same manner as if they were incorporated in this act : provided that except in nothing in this act contained shall in any man- SSfme"™-'^ ner alter or affect any enactment relating to pro- poiitan oedure in the case of any offence punishable on trfofc^ summary conviction within the City of London 138 Malicious Iryuries to Property Act, #c. or tlie Metropolitan Police District, or tlie re- covery or application of any penalty or forfeiture for any sucli offence. The costs 77. The court before wliicli. any indictable mis- prose^oution demeanor against tMs act shall be prosecuted or otmisde- tried may allow the costs of the prosecution in against this the same manner as m cases oi felony ; and every allowed.''^ order for the payment of such costs shall be madi out, and the sum of money mentioned therein paid and repaid, upon the same terms and in the same manner in all respects as in cases of felony. Act not to 78. Nothing in this act contained shall extend locTtiimd? *° Scotland, except as hereinbefore otherwise ex- pressly provided. 79. This act s ' on the first day c hundred and sixty-one. Commence- 79. This act shall commence and take effect ■ on the first day of November one thousand eight 139 V. FORGERY ACT. 24 & 25 ViOT. CAP. 98. An Act to consolidate and amend the Statute Law of England and Ireland relating to indictable Offences by Forge?-//. — [6th August, 1861.] Wheeeas it is expedient to consolidate and amend the statute law of England and Ireland relating to indictable offences by forgery : Be it enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Oonunons, in this present Par- hament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : As to forging Her Majesty's seals : 1. Whosoever shall forge or counterfeit, orForgin^the shall utter, knowing the same to be forged or ^^?^^ Seal, counterfeited, the Great Seal of the United King- &o. dom, Her Majesty's privy seal, any privy signet of Her Majesty, Her Majesty's royal sign manual, any of Her Majesty's seals appoioted by the twenty-fourth article of the union between Eng- land and Scotland to be kept, used, and continued in Scotland, the Great Seal of Ireland, or the privy seal of Ireland, or shall forge or counter- feit the stamp or impression of any of the seals aforesaid, or shaU. utter any document or instru- ment whatsoever, having thereon or aflSxed there- to the stamp or impression of any such forged or counterfeited seal, knowing the same to be the stamp or impression of such forged or counter- 140 Forgery Act, Forging transfer of certain Btoclz, and power of attorney relating thereto. felted seal, or any forged or counterfeited stamp or impression made or apparently intended to resemble tlie stamp or impression of any of the seals aforesaid, knowing tlie same to be forged or counterfeited, or shall forge or alter, or utter, knowing tlie same to be forged or altered, any document or instrument having any of the said stamps or impressions thereon or affixed thereto, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. As to forging transfers of stock, &o. : 2. Whosoever shall forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any transfer of any share or interest of or in any stock, annuity, or other public fund which now is or hereafter may be transferable at the Bank of England or at the Bank of Ireland, or of or in the capital stock of any body corporate, company, or society which now is or hereafter may be established by charter, or by, under, or by virtue of any act of Parlia- ment, or shall forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any power of attorney or other authority to transfer any share or interest of or in any such stock, annuity, public fund, or capital stock, or to receive any dividend or money payable in respect of any such share or interest, or shall demand or endeavour to have any such share or interest -transferred, or to re- ceive any dividend or money payable in respect thereof, by virtue of any such forged or altered power of attoi-ney or other authority, knowing the same to be forged or altered, with intent in any 24 # 25 Vict. cap. 98. 141 of the cases aforesaid to defraud, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be Uable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 3. Whosoever shall falsely and deoeitfullv per- Personnting « T '^ . . , fr •„ the owDer of senate any owner ot any share or mterest oi or m oertaia any stock, annuity, or other public fund which ^°°^fg™? g now is or hereafter may be transferable at the or recemng Bank of England, or at the Bank of Ireland, or °l^'^fg\, any owner of any share or interest of or in the transfer or capital stock of any body corporate, company, or dividends, society which now is or hereafter may be esta- blished by charter, or by, under, or by virtue of any act of Parliament, or any owner of any dividend or money payable in respect of any such share or interest as aforesaid, and shall thereby transfer or endeavour to transfer any share or interest belonging to any such owner, or thereby receive or endeavour to receive any money due to any such owner, as if such offender were the true and lawful owner, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 4. Whosoever shaU. forge any name, hand- rorging writing, or signature purporting to be the name, JJ pow?r°of handwriting, or signature of a witness attesting attorney for 11 ,.° . ° . ,, ,1 ° transfer of the execution or any power ot attorney or otner atook, && authority to transfer any share or interest of or in any such stock, annuity, public fund, or capital stock as is in either of the last two preceding sections mentioned, or to receive any dividend or money payable in respect of any such share or 142 Forgery Act, interest, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put' off any such power of attorney or other authority, with any such |orged name, handwriting, or sig- nature thereon, knowing the same to be forged, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shaU be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. Making 5. Whosoever shall wilfully make any false in the™ookB entry in, or wilfully alter any word or figure in, of the public any of the books of account kept by the Governor fmds. ^^^ Company of the Bank of England or the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, in which books the accounts of the owners of any stock, annuities, or other public funds which now are or hereafter may be transferable at the Bank of England or at the Bank of Ireland shall be entered and kept, or shall in any manner wilfully falsify any of the accounts of any of such owners in any of the said books, with intent in any of the cases aforesaid to defraud, or shall wilfully make any transfer of any share or interest of or in any stock, annuity, or other public fund which now is or hereafter may be transferable at the Bank of England or at the Bank of Ireland, in the name of any person not being the true and lawful owner of such share or interest, with intent to defraud, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal ser- vitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinem.ent. Clerks of the 6. Whosoever, being a clerk, oiEcer, or servant making out 0^ or other person employed or intrusted by the 24 (J- 25 Vict. cap. 98. 143 Governor and Conapany of the Bank of England false - ~ . - _ - , divide warrants. or the Governor and Company of the Bank of f'^-^™* Ireland, shall knowingly make out or deliver any dividetid warrant, or warrant for pajrment of any annuity, interest, or money payable at the Bank of England or Ireland, for a greater or less amount than the person on whose behaK such warrant shall be made out is entitled to, with intent to defraud, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal ser- vitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and vrith or without solitary confinement. As to forging India bonds : 7. Whosoever shaU. forge or alter, or shall Forging an offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowuig the ^^^^^ same to be forged or altered, any bond commonly called an East India Bond, or any bond, deben- ture, or security issued or made under the au- thority of any act passed or to be passed relating to the East Indies, or any indorsement on or assignment of any such bond, debenture, or security, with intent to defraud, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or vrithout hard labour, and vyith or without solitary confinement. As to forging exchequer bills, &c. : 8. Whosoever shall forge or alter, or shall Forging offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the ^^if^'^^^'^^^g same to be forged or altered, any exchequer bill and' or exchequer bond or exchequer debenture, or any ^i'™''i™, indorsement on or assignment of any exchequer 144 Forgery Act, Making plateB, &c., in imitation of those used for exchequer bills, &C. Making^ paper in bill or excliequer bond or exchequer debenture, or any receipt or certificate for interest accruing thereon, witL. iiitent to defraud, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years with or without hard labour, and with or without soUtary confinement. 9. Whosoever, without lawful authority or excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party accused), shall make or cause or procure to be made, or shall aid or assist in makiag, or shall knowingly have in his custody or possession, any frame, mould or instrument having therein any words, letters, figures, marks, lines, or devices pecnhar to and appearing in the substance of any paper provided or to be provided or used for exchequer bills or exchequer bonds or exchequer debentures, or any machinery for working any threads into the substance of any paper, or any such thread, and intended to imitate such words, letters, figures, marks, lines, threads, or devices, or any plate pecuUarly employed for printing such exchequer bills, bonds, or deben- tures, or any die or seal peculiarly used for preparing any such plate, or for sealing such exchequer bUls, bonds, or debentures, or any plate, die, or seal intended to imitate any such plate, die, or seal as aforesaid, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal ser- vitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or vrithout hard labour, and with or without soHtary confinement. 10. Whosoever, without lawful authority or excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 98. 143 accused), sliall make, or cause to procure to be imitation ot made, or aid or assist in making any paper in the exchequer"' substance of wHch. shall appear any words, letters, tills, &o. figures, marks, Unes, threads, or other devices peculiar to and appearing in the substance of any paper provided or to be provided or used for such excheq^uer bills, bonds or debentui'es, or any part of such words, letters, figures, marks, lines, threads, or other devices, and intended to imitate the same, or shall knowingly have in his custody or possession any paper whatsoever, in the substance whereof shall appear anj' such words, letters, figures, marks, lines, threads, or devices as afore- said, or any parts of such words, letters, figures,- marks, lines, threads, or other devices, and in- tended to imitate the same, or shall cause or assist m causing any such words, letters, figures, marks, lines, threads, or devices as aforesaid, or any part of such words, letters, figures, marks, lines, threads, or other devices, and intended to imitate the same, to appear in the substance of any paper whatever, or shall take or assist in taking any impression of any such plate, die, or seal as in the last preceding section mentioned, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be hable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 11. Whosoever, without lawful authority or Having in excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party ^aper™"" accused), shall pm-chase or receive, or knowingly p!'"^^' °'' have in his custody or possession, any paper used for manufactured and provided by or under the ^fiig^*'' directions of the Commissioners of Inland Eevenue or Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury, for the purpose of being used as H bank note, 146 Forgery Act, exchequer bills or exchequer bonds or exchequer debentures, before such paper shall have been duly stampeA, signed, and issued for public use, or any such plate, die, or seal as in the last two preceding sections mentioned, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding three years, with or without hard labour. As to forging bank notes : Forging^ 12. Whosoever shall forge or alter, or shall ' - Qffg]-^ utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any note or bill of exchange of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or of the Governor and Com- pany of the Bank of Ireland, or of any other body corporate, company, or person carrying on the business of bankers, commonly called a bank note, a bank bill of exchange, or a bank post bill, or any indorsement on or assignment of any bank note, bank bill of exchange, or bank post bill, with intent to defraud, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confine- ment. Purchasing 13. Whosoever, without lawful authority or or ha°vto"^ excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party forged bank accused), shall purchase or receive from any other person, or have in his custody or possession, any forged bank note, bank bill of exchange, or bank post bUl, or blank bank note, blank bank bill of exchange, or blank bank post bill, know- ing the same to be forged, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable. 24 ^- 25 Vict. cap. 98. 147 at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, ■with or without hard labour. As to maJdng and engraving plates, &c., for bank notes, &c. : 14. Whosoever, without lawful authority or Making or excuse (the proof whereof shall He on the party ^^^fM. accused), shall make or use, or knowingly have making in his custody or possession, any frame, mould, thl'word* or instrument for the making of paper with the " Bank of words "Bank of England" or "Bank of Ire- o°" Bank of land," or amy part of such words intended to '"'^°'''." °J resemble and pass for the same, visible in the tjar lines, substance of the paper, or for the making of f "ifing gmjii paper with curved or waving bar lines, or with paper, the laying wire lines thereof in a waving or curved shape, or with any number, sum, or amount expressed in a word or words in Eoman letters, visible in the substance of the paper, or with any device or distinction peculiar to and appearing in the substance of the paper used by the Governor and Company of the Banks of England and Ireland respectively for any notes, bills of exchange, or bank post biUs of such banks respectively, or shall make, use, sell, expose to sale, utter, or dispose of, or know- ingly have in Lis custody or possession, any paper whatsoever with the words "Bank of -England" or "Bank of Ireland," or any part of such words intended to resemble and pass for the same, visible in the substance of the paper, or any paper with curved or waving bar lines, or with the laying wire lines thereof in a waving or curved shape, or with any number, sum, or amount expressed in a word or words in Eoman letters, appearing visible in the substance of the paper, or with any device or distinction peculiar h2 148 Forgery Act, to and appearing in tlie substance of the paper used by tbe GoTemor and Company of the Banks of England and Ireland respectively for any notes, bills of exchange, or bank post biUs of such banks respectively, or shall by any art or contrivance cause the words " Bank of England," or " Bank of Ireland," or any part of such words intended to resemble and pass for the same, or any device or distinction peculiar to and appear- ing in the substance of the paper used by the Governor and Company of the Banks of England and Ireland respectively for any notes, bills of exchange, or bank post bills of such banks respec- tively, to appear visible in the substance of any paper, or shall cause the numerical sum or amount of any bank note, bank bill of exchange, or bank post bill, blank bank note, blank bank bill of exchange, or blank bank post bill, in a word or words in Eoman letters, to appear visible in the substance of the paper whereon the same shall be written or printed, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at tjie discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years-, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. Proviso as to 15. Nothing in the last preceding section con- Fo°r'biiis'o? tained shall prevent any person from issuing any exchange, biU of exchange or promissory note having the *°' amount thereof expressed in guineas, or in a numerical figure or figures denoting the amount thereof in pounds sterling, appearing visible in the substance of the paper upon which the same shall be written or printed, nor shall prevent any person from making, using, or seUing any paper having waving or curved lines or any other devices in the nature of watermarks visible in the substance of the paper, not being bar lines 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 98. 149 or laying wire lines, provided tlie same are not so contrived as to form the ground work or texture of the paper, or to resemble the waving or curved laying wire lines or bar lines or the watermarks of the paper used by the Governor and Company of the Banks of England and Ireland respectively. 16.(') Whosoever, without lawful authority or Engraving excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party aiy pii^, accused), shall engrave or in anywise make upon *«•- for any plate whatsoever, or upon any wood, stone, note8°o1 or other material, any promissory note, bill of E^"^ "' exchange, or bank post bill, or part of a pro- Ireland, or missory note, bill of exchange, or bank post bill w'^hlvtag'^^ purporting to be a bank note, bank bill of ex- ^°^ pia>e, , change, or bank post bill of the Governor and uttering or Company of the Bank of England, or of the ^^J^^js^p^^ Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, which a or of any other body corporate, company or per- no^^sa:^^ son carrying on the business of bankers, or to be ^i"?" ^^ a blank bank note, blank promissory note, blank bank bill of exchange, or blank bank post bill of the Governor and Company of the Bank of Eng- land, or of the Governor and Company o/ the Bank of Ireland, or of any such other body cor- porate, company, or person as aforesaid, or to be a part of a bank note, promissory note, bank bill of exchange or bank post biU of the Governor and Oompa,ny of the Bank of England or of the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, or of any such other body corporate, company, or person as aforesaid, or any name, word, or character resembling or apparently intended to resemble any subscription to any bill of exchange or promissory note issued by the Governor and Q) Engramng plate of a Scotch bank note. — It is an offence under sect. 16 to feloniously and without lawful excuse engrave upon a plate in England a note of a bank in Scot- land or in the colonies : (^Reg. v. Braokenridge arid another, 18 L. T. Eep. 369; Law Bep. 1 C. C. Res. I3a.) 150 Forgery Act, Engraving on a plate, &c., any word, number, or device resembling part of a "bank note or bill, or using or Company of the Bank of England or the Governor and Company of tlie Bank of Ireland, or by any sucli ^other body corporate, company, or person as aforesaid, or shall use any such plate, wood, stone, or other material, or any other instrument or device, for th^ making or printing any bank note, bank bUl of exchange, or bank post bill, or blank bank note, blank bank bill of exchange, or blank bank post bill, or part of a bank note, bank bill of exchange, or bank post bill, or knowingly have in his custody or posses- sion any such plate, wood, stone, or other material, or any such instrument or device, or shall knowingly offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, or have in his custody or possession, any paper upon which any blank bank note, blank bank bill of exchange, or blank bank post bill of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or of the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, or of any such other body corporate, com- pany, or person as aforesaid, or part of a bank note, bank bill of exchange, or bank post.bUl, or any name, word, or character resembling or apparently intended to resemble any such subscription, shall be made or printed, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be impri- soned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 17. Whosoever, without lawful authority or excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party accused), shall engrave or in anywise make upon any plate whatsoever, or upon any wood, stone, or other material, any word, number, figure, device, character, or ornament the im- pression taken from which shall resemble or ap- 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 98. 151 parently be intended to resemble any part of a having any bank note, bank bill of exchange, or bank post ^*o^''''°' bill of tbe Governor and Company of tbe Bank uttering or of England or of the Governor and Company of paper m"^ the Bank of Ireland, or of any other body cor- '''''* "=? ' *'.•', such word, porate, company, or person carrymg on the &o., is business of bankers, or shall use or knowingly '"P'^^^^'J- have in his custody or possession, any such plate> wood, stone, or other material, or any other instrument or device for the impressing or making upon any paper or other material any word, number, figure, character, or ornament which shall resemble, or apparently be intended to resemble any part of a bank note, bank bill of exchange, or bank post bUl of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or of the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, or of any such other body corporate, company, or person as aforesaid, or shall knowingly offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, or have in his custody or possession, any paper or other ma- terial upon which there shall be an impression of any such matter as aforesaid, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 18. Whosoever, without lawful authority or Making or excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party mo™d for accused), shall make or use any frame, mould, making or instrument for the manufacture of paper, with ftJname of the name or firm of any body corporate, company, ^''y ^'^^^^' or person carrying on the business of bankers or having (other than and except the Banks of England and ™'='' p^p"''" Ireland respectively), appearing visible in the substance of the paper, or knowingly have in his 152 Forgery Act, custody or possession any such frame, mould, or instrument, or make use, sell, expose to sale, utter, or dispose of, or knowingly have in his custody or possession, any paper in the substance of which the name or firm of any such body corporate, company, or person shall appear visible, or by any art or contrivance cause the name or firm of any such body corporate, company, or person to appear visible in the substance of the paper upon which the same shall be written or printed, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be Hable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. Engraving 19-(') Whosoever, without lawful authority or ?orefmi)ffls excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party ornotes, or accused), shall engrave or in anywise make upon having Buch ^^y plate whatsoever, or upon any wood, stone, or plates, or other material, any bill of exchange, promissory paper on note, undertaking, or order for payment of money, part'of^MT o^ ^'^■1 P^"^^ °^ ^'ly ^J^ "^ exchange, promissory such bill note, undertaking, or order for payment of money, or not© iS'i, 1 .1 -L J printed. m whatsoever language the same may be expressed, and whether the same shall or shall not be or be ' intended to be under seal, purporting to be the bill, note, undertaking, or order or part of the bill, note, undertaking, or order of any foreign prince or state, or of any minister or officer in the service of any foreign prince or state, or of any body cor- (^ Photographic impi'esHon en glass. —The taking of a "positive" impression of a note on glass by means of the photographic process is a "making" of a note within the meaning of this section, although the impression so taken is evanescent, and although it cannot be printed or en- graved from until it hag been converted into a "negative " : {Reg. V. Sinaldi, Leigh & Cave, 330 ; 9 Cox Crim. Gas. 391 : 33 L. J. M. 0. ?8.) 24 ^ 25 Viet. cap. 98. 153 porate or body of the like nature, constituted or recognised by any foreign piince or state, or of any person or company of persons, resident in any country not under the dominion of Her Majesty, or shall use, or knowingly have in his custody or possession, any plate, stone, wood, or other material, upon which any such foreign bill, note, undertak- ing, or order, or any part thereof, shall be engraved or made, or shall knowingly offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, or have in his custody or possession, any paper upon which any part of any such foreign bill, note, undertaking, or order shall be made or printed, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less tham three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without soHtary confine- ment. As to forging deeds, wills, bills, of ex- change, &c. : 20. (^) Whosoever, with intent to defraud, shall Forging forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or bondl', &c put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any deed, or any bond or writing obligatory, or any assignment at law or in equity of any such (') Deed — Ante-dating. — E. made an equitable deposit of title-deeds with G. for 7301., and afterwards assigned all his property to B. for the benefit of fais creditors. He and his assignee B. then, for an additional advance, conveyed to G. the freehold of the property to which the deeds so de- pjsited related. After this, the prisoner R. executed a deed of assignment to the other prisoner of a large part of the land so con vey ed to G. for a long term of years, but this deed was falsaly ante-dated before the conveyance by E. and B. to Gr., and upon this deed the prisoners resisted G.'s title to possession of this part of the land. Held, that this deed so ante-dated for the purpose of defrauding G., amounted to forgery : (Reg. v. Ritson and another, 21 L. T. Eep. 437 ; 29 L. J. M. C. 10.) H 3 154 Forgery Act, bond or -writing obligatory, or stall forge any name, handwriting, or signature purporting to be the name, handwriting, or signature of a witness at- testing the execution of any deed, bond, or writing obligatory, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off any deed, bond, or writing obligatory, having thereon any such forged name, handwriting, or signature, knowing the same to be forged, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be Uable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without soUtary confine- ment. Forging 21. Whosoever, with intent to defraud, shall '""'■ forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any will, testament, codicil, or testamentary in- strument, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. Forging 22. Whosoever shall forge or alter, or shall offer, ejcchango oi-ntter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to promissory ^jg forged or altered, any bill of exchange, or any acceptance, indorsement, or assignment of any bill of exchange, or any promissory note for the pajrment of money, or any indorsement or assignment of any such promissory note, with intent to defraud, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years,— or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 98. ' 155 23.('') Whosoever shall forge or alter, or shall Forging offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the reodpts, Se- same to be forged or altered, any undertaking, for money, warrant, order, authority, or request for the pay- ^°° ^' ment of money, or for the delivery or transfer of any goods or chattels, or of any note, bill, or other security for the pa3Tnent of money, or for procur- ing or giving credit, or any indorsement on or as- signment of any such undertaking, warrant, order, authority, or request, or any accountable receipt, acquittance, or receipt for money or for goods, or for any note, bill, or other security for the pay- (<) Guarantee. — Under this section it has been held that a writtun proniiee in cousideratiou of his appointing B. his agent, to guarantee A. against any loss he may incur by B.'s negligence or dishonesty, is an undertaking for the payment of money: (^Reg. v. Joyce, Leigh & Cave, 576; 10 Cox Crim. Cas. 100 ; 34 L. J. M. C. 168.) A turnpike toll-gate ticket is a receipt for money within this section: (Reg. v. Fitch, Leigh & Cave, 169; 9 Cox Orim. Cas. 160; Seg. v. Sowley, 6 L. T. Eep. 256; 31 L. J. M. C. 146. Ac^iitance— Receipt.— A document issued to members of the Ancient Order of Foresters Friendly Society called a "clearance," certified that the member had paid all his dues and demands, and authorised any court of the order to accept the bearer as a clearance member. Held, that this was not tbe subject of forgery within the twenty-third sec- tion as an acquittance or receipt: {Beg. v. Freneh, 21 L. T. Eep. 727; 29 L.J. M. C. 58.) Friendly society— Banker's passbook. — The prisoner was the treasurer and also a member of an unenrolled friendly society, and it was his duty to pay moneys received into the society's bankers. The prisoner produced to the society a fictitious book purporting to be the bank pass-book, con- taining entries purporting to vouch that he paid certain moneys into the bank, and that the bank acknowledged the receipt of them, which book did not truly represent the state of accounts. The prisoner having at various times drawn out moueys which he had appropriated for his own purposes, the jury found him guilty of presenting a false account with intent to obtain credit for having paid the moneys into the bank with a view to obtain other moneys from the society which he might fraudulently appropriate to his own use. Held, that the prisoner, though a member of the society, might properly be convicted of uttering a forged receipt with intent, &o. : (Reg v. Smith, 6 L. T. Kep. 300; 31L. J. M. C. 164.) 156 Forgery Act, ment of money, or any indorsement on or assign- ment of any such accountable receipt, with intent, in any of thfe cases aforesaid, to defraud, stall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary con- finement. Any person 24. Whosoevsr, with intent to defraud, shall ™°''''an°' draw, make, sign, accept, or indorse any bill of any bill, exchange or promissory note, Or any undertaking, proouvationf Warrant, order, authority, or request for the pay- without ment of m.oney, or for the dehvery or trans- authority, or fer of goods or chattels, or of any bill, note, anv audi ""^ o^'-'^^r security for money, by procuration or bill, note, otherwise, for, in the name, or on the account of any or accepted^ Other person, without lawful authority or excuse, or with intent shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off any such bill, to be guilty note, undertaking, warrant, order, authority, or re- or felony, q^est so drawn, made, signed, accepted, or indorsed by procuration or otherwise, without lawful autho- rity or excuse, as aforesaid, knowing the same to have been so drawn, made, signed, accepted, or indorsed as aforesaid, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the dis- cretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary con- finement. Obliterating 25. Whenever any cheque or draft on any oliequer ""' banker shall be crossed with the name of a banker, or with two transverse lines with the words "and company," or any abbreviation thereof, whoso- ever shall obliterate, add to, or alter any such crossing, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 98. 157 any cheque or draft whereon any such obliteration, addition, or alteration has been made, knowing the same to have been made, with intent, in any of the cases aforesaid, to defraud, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for hfe, or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 26. Whosoever shall fraudulently forge or alter, Forgiog or shaU offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing debentures, the same to be forged or fraudulently altered, any debenture issued under any lawful authority what- soever, either within Her Majesty's dominions or elsewhere, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary con- finement. As to forging records, process, instruments of evidence, &c. : 27. Whosoever shall forge or fraudulently alter, Forging or shaU offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, know- Pf^rte"" ' ins the same to be forged or fraudulently altered, record or , .. . ° , -', J courts of any record, wnt, return, panel, process, rule, order, equity, warrant, interrogatory, deposition, affidavit, affir- mation, recognisance, cognovit actionem, or war- rant of attorney, or any original document what- soever of or belonging to any court of record, or any bill, petition, process, notice, rule, answer, pleading, interrogatory, deposition, affidavit, affir- mation, report, order, or decree, or any original document whatsoever of or belonging to any court of equity or Court of Admiralty in England or 158 Fwgery Act, Ireland, or any document or writing, or any copy of any document or writing, used or intended to be used as evidence in any court in this section men- tioned, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not ex- ceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. Forging 28. Whosoever, being the clerk of any court, 00^68 or or other officer having the custody of the records of records, of any court, or being the deputy of any such courts not of '^^^^ or officer, shall utter any false copy or cer- record, and tificate of any record, knowing the same to be proMsa"'^^^ false ; and whosoever, other than such clerk, officer, or deputy, shall sign or certify any copy or certificate of any record as such clerk, officer, or deputy ; and whosoever shall forge or fraudulently alter, or offer, utter, dispose of, or put off; knowing the same to be forged or fraudulently altered, any copy or certificate of any record, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off any copy or certificate of any record having thereon any false or forged name, handwriting, or signature, knowing the same to be false or forged ; and whosoever shall forge the seal of any court of record, or shall forge or fraudulently alter any process of any court other than such courts as in the last preceding section mentioned, or shall serve or enforce any -forged process of any court whatsoever, knowing the same to be forged, or shall deliver or cause to be delivered to any person any paper falsely pur- porting to be any such process, or a copy thereof, or to be any judgment, decree or order of any -court of law or equity, or a copy thereof, knowing the same to be false, or shall act or profess to act under any such false process, knowing the same to be false, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- 24 4- 5fa Vict. cap. 98. 159 victed thereof, shall he Kable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 29. Whosoever shaU forge or fraudulently alter, ForgiDg or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing instruments the same to be forged or fraudulently altered, any dence by iastrument, whether written or printed, or partly parifament. written and partly printed, which is or shall be made evidence by any act passed or to be passed, and for which offence no punishment is herein provided, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. As to forging coui-t rolls : 30. Whosoever shall forge or alter, or shall Forging offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the ''°""'' '■°"^' same to be forged or altered, any court roll, or copy of any court roll, relating to any copyhold or customary estate, with intent to defraud, shall be guilty of felony,' and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and vrith or without solitary confine- ment. As to forging registers of deeds : 31. Whosoever shall forge or fraudulently alter. Forgery as or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing J°p^®^ g, the same to be forged or fraudulently altered, any deeds, memorial, affidavit, affirmation, entry, certificate, 160 Forgery Act, indorsemenf, document, or writing, made or issued under the provisions of any act passed or hereafter to be passed for or relating to the registry of deeds, or shall forge or counterfeit the seal of or belong- ing to any office for the registry of deeds, or any stamp or impression of any such seal ; or shall forge any name, handwriting, or signature pur- porting to be the name, handwriting, or signatui-e of any person to any such memorial, affidavit, affirmation, entry, certificate, indorsement, docu- ment, or writing which shall be required or directed to be signed by or by virtue of any act passed or to be passed, or shall offer, utter, dis- pose of, or put off any such memorial or other writing as in this section before mentioned, having thereon any such forged stamp or impression of any such seal, or any such forged name, hand- vmting, or signature, knowing, the same to be forged, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confine- ment. As to forging orders, &c., of justices of the peace : Forging 32. Whosoever, with intent to defraud, shall iu8ttces°'re- forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or cognisances, put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, &o. any summons, conviction, order, or warrant oi any justice of the peace, or any recognisance pur- porting to have been entered into before any justice of the peace, or other officer authorised to take the same, or any examination, deposition, affidavit, affirmation, or solemn declaration, taken or made before any justice of the peace, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall • 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 98. 161 be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or "without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. As to forging the name of the Accountant General, &c. : 33. Whosoever, with intent to defraud, shall Forging forge or alter any certificate, report, entry, in- J*™ "^^.^t dorsement, declaration of trust, note, direction, General, &c., authority, instrument or writing made or purport- chancery in ing or appearing to be made by the Accountant frefand^or General, or any other officer of the Court of of anyg'udge Chancery in England or Ireland, or by any judge Landlid or officer of the Landed Estates Court in Ireland, Estates or by any officer of any court ia England or Ireland. Ireland, or by any cashier or other officer or clerk of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or Ireland, or the name, handwriting, or signature of any such Accountant General, judge, cashier, officer, or clerk as aforesaid, or shall offer,, utter, dispose of, or put off any such certificate, report, entry, indorsement, declaration of trust,, note, direction, authority, instrument, or writing, knowing the same to be forged or altered, shaU be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. As to falsely acknowledging recognisances, &o. : 34. Whosoever, vrithout lawful authority or ^5'^?°";^. excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party oogniaance, ; accused), shall, in the name of any other person, *„*^!;_'2^;_ ;„ acknowledge any recognisance or bail, or any the name of 162 Forgery Act, Forging or uttering xnarrifl-ge licence or certiilcato. Forging registers of girths, baptisms, mamages, deaths, or burials. cognovit actionem, or judgment, or any deed or other instrument, before any court, judge, or other person lawfully authorised in that behalf, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not ex- ceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. As to forging marriage Ucenoes : 35. Whosoever shall forge or fraudulently alter any licence of or certificate for marriage, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off any such licence or certificate, knowing the same to be forged or fraudulently altered, shall be guUty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two, years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confine- ment. As to forging registers of births, marriages, and deaths : 36. Whosoever shall unlawfully destroy, deface, or injure, or cause or permit to be destroyed, defaced, or injured, any register of births, bap- tisms, marriages, deaths, or burials which now is or hereafter shall be by law authorised or required to be kept in England or Ireland, or any part of any such register, or any certified copy of any such register, or any part thereof, or shall forge or fraudulently alter in any such register any entry relating to any birth, baptism, marriage, death or burial, or any part of any such register, or any certi- fied copy of such register, or of any part thereof, or shall knowingly and unlawfully insert or cause or 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 98. 163 permit to be inserted in any such register, or in any certified copy thereof, any false entry of any matter relating to any birth, baptism, marriage, death or burial, or shall knowingly and unlawfully give any false certificate relating to' any birth, baptism, marriage, death or burial, or shall certify any writing to be a copy or extract from any such register, knowing such writing, or the part of such register whereof such copy or extract shall be so given, to be false in any material particular, or shall forge or counterfeit the seal of or belonging to any register office or burial board, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off any such register, entry, certified copy, certificate, or seal, knowing the same to be false, forged, or altered, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off any copy of any entry in any such register, knowing such entry to be false, forged, or altered, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement 37. Whosoever shall knowingly and wilfully Makins insert or cause or permit to be inserted in any [^ 0™^^™" copy of any register directed or required by law register sent to be transmitted to any registrar or other officer "^^^ '"' any false entry of any matter relating to any baptism, marriage, or burial or shall forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any copy of any register so directed or required to be transmitted as aforesaid, or shall knowingly and wilfully sign or verify any copy of any register so directed or required to be transmitted as aforesaid, which copy shall be false in any part thereof, knowing the same to be false, or shall unlawfully destroy, deface, or injure, or shall for any fraudulent pur- 164 Forgery Act, pose take from its place of deposit, or conceal, any such copy of any register, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for life, or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. As to demanding property upon forged in- struments : Demanding 38. Whosoever, with intent to defraud, shall upon^forged demand, receive, or obtain, or cause or procure to instruments, ^e delivered or paid to any person, or endeavour to receive or obtain, or to cause or procure to be delivered or paid to any person, any chattel, money, security for money, or other property whatsoever, under, upon, or by virtue of any forged or altered instrument whatsoever, knowing the same to be forged or altered, or under, upon, or by virtue of any probate or letters of admistration, knowing the will, testament, codicil, or testamentary writing on which such probate or letters of ad- ministration shall have been obtained to have been forged or altered, or knowing such probate or letters of administration to have been obtained by any false oath, affirmation, or affidavit, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the com-t, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not ex- ceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. As to other matters : Forging any 39. Where by this or by any other act any howe"v"r'' person is or shall hereafter be made liable to designated, punishment for forging or alterine, or for offerins, which is in ^,, . ,. ■ r j.i- «. , • ,, law a will, uttermg, disposmg ot, or puttmg off, knowmg the 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 98. 165 same to be forged or altered, any instrament or wii of ex- writing designated in sucli act by any special "'^^''se. *". name or description and such instrument or writing, however designated, shall be in law a will, testa- ment, codicil, or testamentary writing, or a deed, bond, or writing obligatory, or a bill of exchange, or a promissory note for the payment of money, or an indorsement on or assignment of a bill of exchange or promissory note for the payment of money, or an acceptance of a bill of exchange, or an undertaking, warrant, order, authority, or request for the payment of money, or an in- dorsement on or assignment of an undertaking, warrant, order, authority, or request for the pay- ment of money, within the true intent and meaning of this act, in every such case the person forging or altering such instrument or writing, or offering, uttering, disposing of, or putting off such instrument or writing, knowing the same to be forged or altered, may be indicted as an offender against this act, and punished accordingly. 40. Where the forging or altering any writing, Forging, &c., or matter whatsoever, or the offering, uttering, J," J-efana*^ disposing of, or putting off any writing or matter dooumenta whatsoever, knowing the same to be forged or t'o'be°made, altered, is in this act expressed to be an offence, <"■ actually if any person shall, in England or Ireland, foi-ge England and or alter, or offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, Yorg^, &c., knowing the same to be forged or altered, any in England , °.,. i, • 1 i_ 1 or Ireland such wntmg or matter m whatsoever place or ^ng of ex- country out of England and Ireland, whether °„™^f;i*°'' under the dominion of Her Majesty or not, such to be pay- writing or matter may purport to be made or may Engiandm- have been made, and in whatever language the Ireland same or any part thereof may be expressed, every such person, and every person aiding, abetting, or counselling such person, shall be deemed to be an offender within the meaning of this act, and shall be punishable thereby in the same manner as if 166 Forgery Act, tlie writing or matter had purported to be made or had been made in England or Ireland : and if any person shall in England or Ireland forge or alter, or offer, utter, dispose of or put off, know- ing the same to be forged or altered, any bill of exchange, or any promissory note for the payment of money, or any indorsement on or assignment of any bill of exchange or promissory note for the pa3rment of money, or any acceptance of any bill of exchange, or any undertaking, warrant, order, authority, or request for the payment of money, or for the delivery or transfer of any goods or security, or any deed, bond, or writing obligatory for the payment of money (whether such deed, bond, or writing obligatory shall be made only for the payment of money, or for the payment of money together with some other purpose), or any indorsem.ent on or assignment of any such undertaking, warrant, order, authority, request, deed, bond, or writing obligatory in what- soever place or country out of England and Ireland, whether under the dominion of Her Majesty or not, the money payable or secured by such bill, note, undertaking, warrant, order, au- thority, request, deed, bond, or writing obligatory may be or may purport to be payable, and in whatever language the same respectively or any part thereof may be expressed, and whether • such bill, note, undertaking, warrant, order, authority, or request be or be not under seal, every such per- son, and every person aiding, abetting, or counsel- ling such person, shall be deemed to be an offender within the meaning of this act, and shall be punishable thereby in the same manner as if the money had been payable or had purported to be payable in England or Ireland. Forgers, &c., 41. If any person shall commit any offence in'the ^ '™'' against this act, or shall commit any offence of couuiy forging or altering any matter whatsoever, or of' 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 98. 167 offering, uttering, disposing of, or putting off any where they matter whatsoever, knowing the same to be forged S^aedOT or altered, whether the offence in any such case "® '° shall be indictable at common law, or by virtue of any act passed or to be passed, every such offender may be dealt with, indicted, tried, and punished, in any county or place in which he shall be appre- hended or be in custody, in the same manner in all respects as it his offence had been actually committed in that county or place ; and every accessory before or after the fact to any such offence, if the same be a felony, and every person aiding, abetting, or counselling the commission of any such offence, if the same be a misdemeanor, may be dealt with, indicted, tried, and punished, in any county or place in which he shall be appre- hended or be in custody, in the same manner in all respects as if his offence, and the offence of his principal, had been actually committed in such county or place. 42. In any indictment for forging, altering. Description offering, uttering, disposing, or putting off any ^J°f ™" instrument it shall be sufficient to describe such indictments instrument by any name or designation by which '" '""'Bory- the same may be usually known, or by the purport thereof, without setting out any copy or fac-simile thereof, or otherwise describing the same or the value thereof. 43. In any indictment for engraving or making Description the whole or any part of any instrument, naatter, me'Dt^i™' or thing whatsoever, or for usincr or having the indictments 1 p 1 ,1 • r 1 ? forengrav- uniawiul custody or possession ot any plate or jng, &c. other material upon which the whole or any part of any instrument, matter, or thing whatsoever shall have been engraved or made, or for having the unlawful custody or possession of any paper upon which the whole or any part of any instru- ment, matter, or thing whatsoever shall have been made or printed, it shall be sufficient to describe 168 Forgery Act, Intent to defraud particular persons ueed not be alleged or proved. suoli instrument, matter, or thing by any name or designation by whicli the same may be usually known, without setting out any copy or fac-simile of the whole or any part of such instrument, matter or thing. 44. It shall be sufficient, in any indictment for forging, altering, uttering, offering, disposing of, or putting off any instrument whatsoever, where it shall be necessary to allege an intent to defraud, to allege that the party accused did the act with intent to defraud, without alleging an intent to defraud any particular person ; and on the trial of any such offence it shall not be necessary to prove an intent to defraud any particular person, but it shall be sufficient to prove that the party accused did the act charged with an intent to defraud. 45. Where the having any matter in the custody or possession of any person is in this act expressed to be an offence, if any person shall have any such matter in his personal custody or possession, or shall knowingly and wilfully have any such matter in the actual custody or posses- sion of any other person, or shall knowingly and wilfully have any such matter in any dwelling house or other building, lodging, apartment, field, or other place, open or inclosed, whether belonging to or occupied by himself or not, and whether such matter shall be so had for his own use or for the use or benefit of another, every such person shall be deemed and taken to have such matter in his custody or possession within the" meaning of this act. Search for 46. If it shall be made to appear, by informa- ISpt'mentB tio"! 0° "^^^ °^ affirmation before a justice of the employed in peace, that there is reasonable cause to believe and fov^"^' that any person has in his custody or possession, insfmnents ^i*!^'"-^* lawful authority or excuse, any note or Interpreta- tion as to criminal possession. 24 4- 25 Vict. cap.M. 169 bill of tte Governor and Company of the Bank of England or Ireland, or of any body corporate, company, or person carrying on the business of bankers, or any frame, mould, or implement for making paper in imitation of tbe paper used for suob. notes or biUs, or any such paper, or any plate, wood, stone, or other material having thereon any words, forms, devices, or characters capable of producing or intended to produce the impression of any such note or bill, or any part thereof, or any tool, implement, or material used or employed or intended to be used or employed in or about any of the operations aforesaid, or any forged security, document, or instrument what- soever, or any machinery, frame, mould, plate, die, seal, paper, or other matter or thing used or employed or intended to be used or employed in the forgery of any security, document, or instru- ment whatsoever, such justice may, if he think fit, graAt a warrant to search for the same ; and if the same shall be found upon such search, it shall be lawful to seize and carry the same before some justice of the county or place, to be by him disposed of according to law ; and all such matters and things so seized as aforesaid shall by order of the court where any such offender shall be tried, or in case there shall be no such trial then by order of some justice of the peace, be defaced and destroyed or otherwise disposed of, as such court or justice shaL. direct. 47. Whosoever shall, after the commencement other of this act, be convicted of any offence which ^J^J'gnb- shall have been subjected by any act or acts to the Btituted for J 1,- . J !_ j.1. those ot the same pams and penalties as are imposed by the 5 euz. 0. 14, act passed in the fifth year of the reign of Queen which have Ehzabeth, intituled " An Act against Forgeries ted in other of False Deeds and Writings," for any of the "''^• offenees first enumerated in the said act, shall be guilty of felony, and shall, in Ueu of such i70 Forgery Act, pains and penalties, be liable, at tbe discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for anj term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confine- ment. All forgeries 48. Where by any act now in force any person ca^iSi^°™ falsely making, forging, counterfeiting, erasing, before the or altering any matter whatsoever, or uttering, 66, and are publishing, offering, disposing of, putting away, Si8e°mSsh- ""^ making use of amy matter whatsoever, knowing able under the same to have been falsely made, forged^ Bhaifbeptm- counterfeited, erased, or altered, oj any person iBhedwith demanding or endeavouring to receive or have penal servi- ,i-°,j j.i.j t tude for life, any thing, or to do or cause to be done any act, *"■ upon or by virtue of any matter whatsoever knowing such matter to have been falsely made, forged, counterfeited, erased, or altered, would, according to the provisions contained in any such act, be guilty of felony, and would, before the passing of the act of the first year of King WiUiam the Fourth, chapter sixty-six, have been liable to suffer death as a felon ; or where by any act now in force any person falsely per- sonating another, or falsely acknowledging any- thing in the name of another, or falsely repre- senting any other person than the real party, to be such real party, or wilfully making a false entry in any book, account, or document or in any manner wilfully falsifying any part of any book, account, or document, or VTilfully making a transfer of any stock, annuity, or fund in the name of any person not being the owner thereof, or knovringly taking any false oath, or knowingly making any false aflSdavit or false afBrmation, or demanding or receiving any money or other thing by virtue of any pro- bate or letters of administration, knowing the 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 98. 171 will on which such probate shall have been obtained to have been false or forged, or knowing such probate or letters of administration to have been obtained by means of any false oath or false affirmation, would, according to the pro- visions contained in any such act, be guilty of felony, and would before the passing of the said act of the first year of King William the Fourth have been liable to suffer death as a felon ; or where by any act now in force any person making or using, or knowingly having in his custody or possession, any frame, mould, or in- strument for the making of paper, with certain words visible in the substance thereof, or any person making such paper, or causing certain words to appear visible in the substance of any paper, would, according to the provisions con- tained in any such act, be guilty of felony, and would before the passing of the said act of the first year of King WUliam the Fourth have been liable to suffer death as a felon ; then, and in each of the several oases aforesaid, if any person shall after the commencement of this act be convicted of any such felony as is hereinbefore in this section mentioned, or of aiding, abetting, counselling, or procuring the commission thereof, and the same shall not be punishable under any •of the other provisions of this act, every such person shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life, or for any term not less than three years, — or to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 49. In the case of every felony punishable Principals in under this act, every principal in the second degree Md degree, and every accessory before the fact, shall acoeBsoriea. be punishable in the same manner as the principal in the first degree is by this act pmiishable ; and I 2 172 Forgery Act, misdemea- nors. Offences committed -wititlin ttie every accessory after the fact to any felony punishable under this act shall on conviction be liable, at the. discretion of the court, to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or Vfithout hard labour, and with or without Abettors in solitary confinement ; and every person who shall ' aid, abet, counsel, or procure the commission of any misdemeanor pimishable under this act shall be liable to be proceeded against, indicted, and punished as a principal offender. 50. All indictable offences mentioned in this act which shall be committed within the jurisdic- j'urisdiction tion of the Admiralty of England or Ireland shall Admiralty. ^^ deemed to be offences of the same nature, and liable to the same punishments, as if they had been committed upon the land in England or Ireland, and may be dealt with, inquired of, tried, and determined in any county or place in England or Ireland in which the offender shall be appre- hended or be in custody, in the same manner in all respects as if they had been actually com- mitted in that county or place ; and in any in- dictment for any such offence, or for being an accessory to such an offence, the venue in the margin shall be the same as if the offence had been committed in such county or place, and the offence shall be averred to have been committed on "the high seas;" provided, that nothing herein contained shall alter or affect any of the laws relating to the Government of Her Majesty's land or naval forces. 51. Whenever any person shall be convicted of a misdemeanor under this act it shall be lawful for the court, if it shall think fit, in addition to or in lieu of any of the punishments by this act authorised, to fine the offender, and to require him to enter into his own recognisances, and to find sureties, both or either, for keeping tlae peace and being of good behaviour ; and in aU cases of Fine and sureties for keeping the peace; in what cases. 24.^25 Viat. cap. 98. 173 felonies in this act mentioned it shall be lawful for the court, if it shall thipk &i, to require the offender to enter into his own recognisances, and to find sureties, both' or either, for keeping the peace, in addition to any of the punishments by this act authorised ; provided that no person shall be imprisoned under this clause for not finding sureties for any period exceeding one year. 52. Whenever imprisonment, with or without Hard labour hard labour, may be awarded , for any offence under this act; the court may sentence the offender to be injprisoned, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour, in the common gaol or house of correction. 53.. Whenever solitary confinement may be Soutary awarded for any offence under this act, the court may direct the offender to be kept in solitary confinement for any portion or portions of his imprisonment, or of his imprisonment with hard , labour, not exceeding one month at any one time, and not, exceeding three months in any one year.- 54. The court before which any indictable The costs of misdemeanor against this act shall be prosecuted tion^™miB-" or tried, may allow the costs of the prosecution in denaeanor , , J _ J. J! 1 J against this the same manner as m cases or felony ; and every act may be order for the pa3rment of such costs shall be »i''"'«''- made out, and the sum of money mentioned therein paid and repaid, upon the same terms and in the same manner in all respects as in cases of ■ felony. 55. Nothing in this act contained shall extend Act not to to Scotland, except as otherwise hereinbefore |eot?ana° expressly provided. 56. This act shall commence and take effect Oommenoe- on the first day of November one thousand eight hundred and sixty one. 174 VI. COINAGE OFFENCES ACT. 24 & 25 ViOT. CAP. 99. An Act to consolidate and amend the Statute Law of the United Kingdom against Offences relating to the Coin. — [6th August, 1861.] Whebeas it is expedient to consolidate and amend the statute law of tlie United Kingdom against offences relating to tte coin : Be it there- fore enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : interpreta- 1. In the interpretation of and for the purposes "™''"°™' of tHs act, the expression "the Queen's current Cuirentgold gold or silver coin " shall include any gold or *°?*''™'' silver coin coined in any of Her Majesty's mints, or lawfully current, by virtue of any pro- clamation or otherwise, in any part of Her Majesty's dominions, whether withiu the United Kingdom or otherwise ; and the expression " the Copper coin. Queen's copper coin " shall include any copper coin and any coin of bronze or mixed metal coined in any cf Her Majesty's mints, or law- fully current, by virtue of any proclamation or otherwise, in any part of Her Majesty's said False or dominions ; and the expression " false or counter- oom'^''^*' feit coin resembling or apparently intended to resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current gold or sUver coin " shall include any of the 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 99. 175 current coin wlxich shall have been gilt, silvered, washed, coloured, or cased over, or in any manner altered, so as to resemble or be apparently in- tended to resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current coin of a higher denomination; and the expression "the Queen's current coin" shall Current coin imelude any coin coined in any of Her Maijesty's mints, or lawfully current, by virtue of any proclamation or otherwise, in any part of Her Majesty's said dominions, and whether made of gold, silver, copper, bronze, or mixed metal; and where the having any matter in the custody or What shall possession of any person is mentioned in this act, afon.°^^'°' it shall include not only the having of it by himself in his personal custody or possession, but also the knowingly and wilfully having it in the actual custody or possession of any other person, and also the knowingly and wilfully having it in any dwelling house or other building, lodging, apartment, field, or other place, open or inclosed, whether belonging to or occupied by himself or not, and whether such matter shall be so had for his own use or benefit or for that of any other person. 2. Whosoever shall falsely make or counterfeit oounterfeit- any coin resembUng or apparently intended to ''oAmer''^^ resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current coin, gold or silver coin, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of felony, and in Scotland of a high crime and offence, and, being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for apy term not less than three years, — or to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 3. Whosoever shall gild or silver, or shall, Colouring with any wash or materials capable of producing oota o?any the colour or appearance of gold or of silver, or by p'^o^b of 176 Coinage Offences Act, metal with any means whatsoever, waslij case over, or colour SS'ethem ^'^7 oom whatsoever resembling or apparently pass for gold intended to resemble or pass for any of the ooiD."' Queen's current gold or silver coin ; or shall gild or silver, or shall, with any wash or materials capable of producing the colour or appearance of gold or of silver, or by any m.eans whatsoever, wash, case over, or colour any piece of silver or copper, or of coarse gold or coarse silver, or of any metal or mixture of metals respectively, being of a fit size and figure to be coined, and with intent that the same shaU be coined into false and counterfeit coin resembling or apparently intended to resemble or pass for any of the Colouring or Queen's current gold or silver coin ; or shall gUd, genSne *"' shall, with any wash or materials capable coin with of producing the colour or appearance of gold, or intent to , -^ " , , -^^ i o - make it pass by any means whatsoever, wash, case over, or ter 9, higher colour any of the Queen's current silver coin, or file or in any manner alter such coin, with intent to make the same resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current gold coin ; or shall gild, or silver, or shall, with any wash or materials capable of producing the colour or appearance of gold or silver, or by any means whatsoever, wash, case over, or colour any of the Queen's current copper coin, or file or in any manner alter such coin, with intent to make the same resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current gold or silver coin, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of felony, and in Scotland of a high crime and offence, and being convicted thereof, shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without soKtary confinement. Impairing 4. Whosoever shaU impair, diminish, or lighten tiiegoidor j^jjy ^f ^^ Queen's current gold or silver coin. 24 c} 25 Vict. cap. 99. 177 with intefit that the jsoin so impaired, diminished, eUvsr coin or lightened may pass for the Queen's current ^"^ '°'°'" gold or silver coin, shall, in England. and Ireland, be guilty of felony, and in Scotland of a high crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. ■ 5. Whosoever shall unlawfully have in his cus- Unlawful tody or possession (') any filings or clippings, or any oJ'^gaor gold or silver bullion, or any gold or silver in dust, oUppings of solution, or otherwise, which shall have been iiTOr'ooia produced or obtained by impairing, diminishing, or lightening any of the Queen's current gold or silver coin, knowing the same to have been so produced or obtaiiied, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of felony, and in Scotland of a high crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without soKtary confinement. 6. Whosoever, without lawful authority or excuse Buying or (the proof whereof shall lie on the party accused), oouSlrte?t' shall buy, seU, receive, pay, or put off, or offer to sM or buy, sell, receive, pay, or put off, any false or coun- for lower terfeit coin resembling or apparently intended to re- ^teaenJmta- semble or pass for any of the Queen's current gold atjon. or silver coin at or for a lower rate or value than the same imports or was apparently intended to import, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of (') As to the meaning of the expression "custody or possession," see the interpretation clause (sect. 1, ante). 178 Coinage Offences Act, felony, and in Scotland of a high crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not ex- ceeding two years, with or vrithout hard labour, and vnth or without solitary confinement ; and in any indictment for any such offence as in this section aforesaid it shall be sufficient to allege that the party accused did buy, sell, receive, pay, or put off, or did offer to buy, sell, receive, pay, or put off, the false or counterfeit coin at or for a lower rate of value than the same imports or was apparently intended to import, without alleging at or for what rate, price, or value the same was bought, sold, received, paid, or put off, or offered to be bought, sold, received, paid, or put off. Importing 7. Whosoever, without lawful authority or "°?n*from' es:cuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party beyond-eeas. acoiised), shall import or receive into the United ' Kingdom from beyond the seas any false or coun- terfeit coin resembling or apparently intended to resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current gold or silver coin, knowing the same to be false or counterfeit, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of felony, and in Scotland of a high crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confine- ment. Exporting 8. Whosoever, without lawful authority or oomiterfeit g^g^gg (^^ proof whereof shall lie on; the party accused), shall export, or put on board any ship, vessel, or boat for the purpose of being exported from the United Kingdom, any false or counter- 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 99. 179 feit coin, resembling or apparently intended to resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current coin, knowing the same to be false or counterfeit, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of a mis- demeanor, and in Scotland of a crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confine- ment. 9. Whosoever shall tender, utter, or put off any uttering false or counterfeit coin resembling or apparently, goia'or'*" ' intended to resemble or pass for any of the Queen's saver coin, current gold or silver coin, knowing the same to be false or counterfeit, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and in Scotland of a crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding one year, with or without hard labour, and with or without soli- tary confinement. 10. Whosoever shall tender, utter, "or put off uttering any false or counterfeit coin resembHng or ap- panSby parently intended to resemble or pass for any of possession the Queen's current gold or silver coin, knowing counterfeit the same to be false or counterfeit, and shall, at "°™' ""■- j^ the time of such tendering, uttering, or putting off, a second have in his custody or possession, besides the false ""^""s- or counterfeit coin so tendered, uttered, or put off, any other piece of false or counterfeit coin re- sembling or apparently intended to resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current gold or silver coin, or shall, either on the day of such tender- ing, uttering or putting off, or within the space of ten days then next ensuing, tender, utter, or put off any false or counterfeit coin resembling or apparently intended to resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current gold or silver coin, knowing 180 Coinage Offences Act, the same to be false or counterfeit, stall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and in Scotland of a crime and offence, and being convicted tbereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. Having 11. Whosoever shall have in his custody or more pfeoes possession three or more pieces of false or counter- of counter- feit coin resembling or apparently intended *to Bilvercoin resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current BS)n°te °' S"-^*^ °^ silver coin, knowing the same to be false with intent, or counterfeit, and with intent to utter or put off *°' the same or any of them, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and in Scotland of a crime and offence, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary con- finement. Every 12. Whosoever, having been convicted either oftence of before or after the passing of this act of any such uttering, &o , misdemeanor or crime and offence as in any of the yious con- last three preceding sections mentioned, or of any be" felony'*" felony or high crime and offence against this or any former act relating to the coin, shall after- wards commit any of the misdemeanors or crimes and offences in any of the said sections mentioned, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of felony, and in Scotland of a high crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the dis- cretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 24 # 25 Vict. cap. 99. 181 13.(^) Whosoever shall, with, intent to defraud, uttering tender, utter, or put ofif as or for any of the Queen's Sis,™?; current gold or silver coin, any coin not being as current such current gold or silver coin, or any medal or SnTt? piece of metal or mixed metals, resembling in size, defraud, figure, and colour the current coin as or for which the same shall be so tendered, uttered, or put off,, such coin, medal, or piece of metal, or mixed, _ metals so tendered, uttered, or put off, being of less value than the current coin as or for which the same shall be so tendered, uttered, or put off, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of a mis- demeanor, and in Scotland of a crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding one year, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 14.(^) Whosoever shall falsely make or counter- Ootmterfeit- feit any coin resembling or apparently intended coppercoin. to resemble or pass for any of the Queen's cur- rent copper coin ; and whosoever, without lawful authority or excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party accused), shall knowingly make or (^ Coining— Uttei-ing a medal resembling a coin. — Under this section the prisoner was indicted for uttering a medal resembling a half-sovereign, in size, figure, and colour, but of less value than half-a-sovereign. The evidence was that the medal was of the same diameter as a half-sovereign, and similar to it in colour ; that the guerling was round and not square ; and that on the obverse side there was a stamp of the head of the Queen similar to that of a half- sovereign, but with a different legend encircling it. There was no evidence of the impression on the reverse side of the medal; and it was held that there was sufficient evi- dence that the medal resembled a half-sovereign in size, figure, and colour, to sustain the conviction ; (Seg v. Robinson, Leigh & Gave, 604 ; 10 Cox Grim. Ca«. 1 07 ; 34 L. J. M. C. 176.J (') By the interpretation clause (sect. 1) the expression ''the Queen's coppei- coin' is to include "any copper coin, and any coin of bronze or mixed metal coined in any of Her Majesty's mints, or lawfully current by virtue of any proclamation or otherwise in any part of Her Majesty's dominions." 182 Coinage Offences Act, mend, or begin to proceed to make or mend, or buy or sell, or have in his custody or possession, any instrument, tool, or engine adapted and in- tended for the counterfeiting any of the Queen's current copper coin ; or shall buy, sell, receive, pay or put off, or offer to buy, sell, receive, pay or put off, any false or counterfeit coin resembfing or apparently intended to resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current copper coin, at or for a lower rate or value than the same imports or was apparently intended to import, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of felony, and in Scotland of a high crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not ex- ceeding two years, with or vrithout hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. uttering 15. ' Whosoever shall tender, utter, or put off cofn. ""'"''" ^iiy f^lse or counterfeit coin resembling or ap- parently intended to resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current copper coin, knowing the same to be false or counterfeit, or shall have in his cus- tody or possession three or more pieces of false or counterfeit coin resembling or apparently intended to resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current copper coin, knowing the same to be false or coun- terfeit, and with intent to utter or put off the same or any of them, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and in Scotland of a crime and bffence, and being convicted thereof shaU be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding one year, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. Defacing 1 6. Whosoever shall deface any of the Queen's atamptag^ current gold, silver, or copper coin, by stamping ■words thereon any names or words, whether such coin thereon. •' ' 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 99. 183 shall or shall not be thereby diminished or light- ened, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and in Scotland of a crime and of- fence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding one year, with or without hard labour. 17. No tender of pa3rment iiT money made in Tender of any gold, sUver, or copper coin so defaced by ^""^^'^a not stamping as in the last preceding section men- to be a legal tioned shall be allowed to be a legal tender ; and penalty for whosoever shall tender, utter, or put off any coin ottering the so defaced shall, on conviction thereof before two justices, be liable to forfeit and pay any sum not exceeding forty shillings : provided that it shall not be lawful for any person to proceed for any such last-mentioned penalty without the consent, in England or Ireland, of Her Majesty's Attorney- General for England or Ireland respectively, or in Scotland of the Lord Advocate. 18. Whosoever shall make or counterfeit any Counterfeit- kind of coin not being the Queen's current gold or ^fdand^ silver coin, but resembling or apparently intended a"ver coin, to resemble or pass for any gold or silver coin of any foreign prince, state, or country, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of felony, and in Scotland of a high crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be hable, at the dis- cretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years,— or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or with- out hard labour, and without or without solitary confinement. 19. Whosoever, without lawful authority or Bringing excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party p^f,"„?^ accused), shall bring or receive into the United into the Kingdom any such false or counterfeit coin resem- KSgdom. 184 Coinage Offences Act, Penalty for nttering such coun- terfeit coin. bling or apparently intended to resemble or pass for any gold or silver coin of any foreign prince, state, or country ,,.knowing tlie same to be false or counterfeit, sball, in England and Ireland, be guilty of felony, and in Scotland of a bigb crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years,: — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 20. Whosoever shall tender, utter, or put. off any such false or counterfeit coin resembling or apparently intended to resemble or pass for any gold or silver coin of any foreign prince, state, or country, knowing the same to be false or counter- feit, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and in Scotland of a crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding six months, with or with- out hard labour. 21. Whosoever, having been so convicted as in the last preceding section mentioned, shall after- wards commit the like offence of tendering, foreigu com. .u^;tering, or putting off any such false or counter- feit coin as aforesaid, knowing the same to be false or counterfeit, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and in Scotland of a crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement ; and whosoever, having been so convicted of a second offence, shall afterwards commit the like offence of tendering, uttering, or putting off any such false or counterfeit coin as aforesaid, knowing the same to be false or counter- second offence of uttering counterfeit Third oflence, 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 99. 185 feit, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of felony, and in Scotland of a Mgh. crime and offence, and being convicted tbereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, -with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confine- ment. 22. Whosoever shall falsely make or counter- Persons feit any kind of coin not being the Queen's f^'J^^^fg'^ current coin, but resembling or apparently in- coin other tended to resemble or pass for any copper coin, or Ind'sUTer any other coin made of any metal or mixed metals ^°™- of less value than the silver coin of any foreign prince, state, or country, shall, in England and Irelaiid, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and in Scotland of a crime and offence, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of. ^ the court, for the first offence to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding one year, and for the second offence to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and vnth or without solitary confine- ment. 23. Whosoever, without lawful authority or Penalty on excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party ha™ing^more aoousedV shall have in his custody or possession "?*° a™ any greater number oi pieces than nve pieces oi such ooun- f alse or counterfeit coin resembling or apparently ^f^^^ ^^m intended to resemble or pass for any gold or silver in their coin of any foreign prmce, state, or country, or any such copper or other coin as in the last pre- ceding section mentioned, shall, on conviction thereof before any justice of the peace, forfeit and lose all such false and counterfeit coin, which shall be cut in pieces and destroyed by order of such 186 Coinage Offences Aet, justice, and shall for every such, offence forfeit and pay any sum of money not exceeding forty shillings nor lesB than ten shillings for every such piece of false and counterfeit coin which shall be found in the custody or possession of such person, one moiety to the informer, and the other moiety to the poor of the parish where such offence shall be committed ; and in case any such penalty shall not be forthwith paid it shall be lawful for any such justice to commit the person who shall have been adjudged to pay the same to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be kept to hard labour for the space of three months, or until such penalty shall be paid. Making, 24.(^) Whosoever, without lawful authority or Si™ngpos- excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party Beasion of accused), shall knowingly make or mend, or begin toolB, felony, or proceed to make or mend, or buy or sell, or have in his custody or possession, any puncheon, counter puncheon, matrix, stamp, die, pattern, or mould, in or upon which there shall be made or impressed, or which will make or impress, or which shall be adapted and intended to make or impress, the figure, stamp, or- apparent resem- blance of both or either of the sides of any of the Queen's current gold or silver coin, or of any coin of _any foreign prince, state, or country, or any part or parts of both or either of such sides ; or shall make or mend, or begin or proceed to maie or mend, or shall buy or sell, or have in his custody or possession, any edger, edging or other tool, col- lar, instrument, or engine adapted and intended for the marking of coin roimd the edges with letters, grainings, or other marks or figures appar- ently resembling those on the edges of any such (') As to having in his " custody or possession," see the interpretation clause (sect. 1), and also the case oi Reg. v. Weeks, 4 L. T. Eep. (N.S.) 373 ; 30 L. J. 141, M.C. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 99. 187 coin as in this section aforesaid, knowing the same to be so adapted and intended as aforesaid ; or shall make or mend, or begin or proceed to make or mend, or shall buy or sell, or have in his custody or possession, any press for coinage, or any cutting engine for cutting by force of a screw or of any other contrivance, round blanks out of gold, sUver, or other metal or mixture of metals, or any other machine, knowing such press to be a press for coinage, or knowing such engine or machine to have been used or to be intended to be used for or in order to the false making or counterfeiting of any such coin as in this section aforesaid, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of felony, and in Scotland of a high crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 25. Whosoever, without lawful authority or Conveying excuse (the proof whereof shall lie on the party moneys out accused), shall knowingly convey out of any of Her ^'(^g^™""* Majesty's mints any puncheon, counter puncheon, Butuoiity, matrix, stamp, die, pattern, mould, edger, edging '^'"''y- or other tool, collar, instrument, press, or engine used or employed in or about the coining of coin, or any useful part of any of the several matters aforesaid, or any coin, bullion, metal, or mixture of metals, shall, in England and Ireland, be guilty of felony, and in Scotland of a high crime and offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary con- finement. 188 Coinage Offences Act, Coin sus- pected to be dimmifihed or counter- feit may be cut by any person to whom it is tendered. Who shall bear the loss. Provision for the discovery and seizure of counter- feit coin and coiningtools, for securing them as evidence, and for ultimately disposing of them. 26. Where any coin shall be tendered as the Queen's current gold or silver coin to any person who shall suspegt the same to be diminished other- wise than by reasonable wearing, or to be counter- feit, it shaU be lawful for such person to cut, break, bend, or deface such coin, and if any coin so cut, broken, bent, or defaced shall appear to be di- minished otherwise than by reasonable wearing, or to be counterfeit, the person tendering the same shall bear the loss thereof ; but if the same shall be of due weight, and shall appear to be lawful coin, the person cutting, breaking, bending, or defacing the same is hereby required to receive the same at the rate it was coined for ; and if any dispute shall arise whether the coin so cut, broken, bent, or defaced be diminished in manner afore- said, or counterfeit, it shall be heard - and finally determined in a summary manner by any justice of the peace, who is hereby empowered to examine upon oath as well the parties as any other person, in order to the decision of Such dispute ; and the tellers at the receipt of Her Majesty's exchequer, and their deputies and clerks, and the receivers general of every branch of Her Majesty's revenue, are hereby required to cut, break, or deface, or cause to be cut, broken, or defaced every piece of counterfeit or unlawfully diminished gold or silver coin which shall be tendered to them in payment of any part of Her Majesty's revenue. 27. If any person shall find or discover in any place whatever, or in the custody or possession of any person having the same without lawful au- thority or excuse, any false or counterfeit coin, resembling or apparently intended to resemble or pass for any of the Queen's current gold, silver, or copper coin, or any coin of any foreign prince, state, or country, or any instrument, tool, or en- gine whatsoever, adapted and intended for the counterfeiting of any such coin, or any filings or 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 99. 189 clippings, or any gold or silver bullion, or any gold or silver in dust, solution, or otherwise, which shall have been produced or obtained by diminish- ing or lightening any of the Queen's current gold or silver coin, it shall be lawful for the person so finding or discovering and he is hereby required to seize the same, and to carry the same forthwith before some justice of the peace ; and where it shall be proved, on the oath of a credible witness before any justice of the peace, that there is reasonable cause to suspect that any person has been concerned in counterfeiting the Queen's cur- rent gold, silver, or copper coin, or any such foreign or other coin as in this act before men- tioned, as has in his custody or possession any such false or counterfeit coin, or any instrument, tool, or engine whatsoever adapted and intended for the making or counterfeiting of any such coin, or any other machine used or intended to be used for making or counterfeiting any such coin, or any such filings, clippings, or bullion, or any such gold or silver in dust, solution, or otherwise as aforesaid, it shall be lawful for any justice of the peace, by warrant under his hand, to cause any place what- soever belonging to or in the occupation or under the control of such suspected person to be searched, either in the day or in the night, and if any such false or counterfeit coin, or any such instrument, tool, or engine, or any such naachine, or any such filings, clippings, or bullion, or any such gold or silver in dust, solution, or otherwise as aforesaid, shall be found in any place so searched, to cause the same to be seized and carried forthwith before some justice of the peace ; and whensoever any such false or counterfeit coin, or any such instru- ment, tool, or engine, or any such machine, or any such filings, clippings, or bullion, or any such gold or silver in dust, solution, or otherwise as afore- said, shall in any case whatsoever be seized and carried before a justice of the peace, he shall, if 190 Coinage Offences. Act, necessary, cause tlie same to be secured, for the purpose of being produced in evidence against any person who majf be prosecuted for any offence against this act ; and all such false and counter- feit coin, and all instruments, tools, and engines adapted and intended for the making or counter- feiting of coin, and all such machines, and all such filings, clippings, and bullion, and all such gold and silver in dust, solution, or otherwise as afore- said, after they shall have been produced in evidence, or when they shall have been seized, and shall not be required to be produced in evidence, shall forthwith be delivered up to the officers of Her Majesty's Mint, or to the solicitors of Her Majesty's Treasury, or to any person atithorised by them to receive the same. Venua. 28.^ Where any person shall tender, utter, or put off any false or counterfeit coin in one county or jurisdiction, and shall also tender, utter, or put off any other false or counterfeit coin in any other county or jurisdiction, either on the day of such first-mentioned tendering, uttering, or putting off, or within the space of ten days next ensuing, or where two or more persons, acting in concert in different counties or jurisdictions, shall commit any offence against this act, every such offender may be dealt with, indicted, tried, and punished, and the offence laid and charged to have been committed, in any one of the said counties or jurisdictions, in the same manner in all respects as if the offence had been actually and wholly committed within such one county or jurisdiction. What Bhaii 29. Where, upon the trial of any person charged proof^f '™' with any offence against this act, it shall be neoes- coin being sary to prove that any coin produced in evidence agamst such person is false or counterfeit, it shall not be necessary to prove the same to be false and counterfeit by the evidence of any moneyer, or counterfeit 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 99. 191 other officer of Her Majesty's Mint, but it shall be sufficient to prove the same to be false or counterfeit by the evidence of any other credible witness. 30. Every offence of falsely making or counter- where the feiting any coin, or of buying, selling, receiving, ™™^i^®''' paying, tendering, uttering, or putting off, or of shaU ba offering to buy, sell, receive, pay, utter, or put """"p'^** off, any false or counterfeit coin, agdinst the provisions of this act, shall be deemed to be complete, although the coin so made or counter- feited, or bought, sold, received, paid, tendered, uttered, or put off, or offered to be bought, sold, received, paid, uttered, or put off, shall not be in a fit state to be uttered, or the counterfeiting thereof shall not be finished or perfected. 31. It shall be lawful for any person whatso- Any person ever to apprehend any person who shall be found ^prehend eommittincr any indictable offence, or any high »°y P^S™ 6 J . J nc ■ i. committing crime and onence, or crime and olience, against any indiot- this act, and to convey or deliver him to some ^|Sn°B°&iB peace officer, constable, or officer of police, in act. order to his being conveyed as soon as reasonably may be before a justice of the peace or some other proper officer, to be dealt with according to law. 32. No conviction for any offence punishable No certiorari, on summary conviction under this act shall be *"" quashed for want of form, or be removed by certiorari into any of Her Majesty's superior courts of record; and no warrant of commit- ment shall be held void by reason of any defect therein, provided it be therein alleged that the party has been convicted, and there be a valid conviction to sustain the same. 33. All actions and prosecutions to be com- venue in menced against any person for anything done in ^^f' pursuance of this act, shall, in England or Ireland; personA 192 Coinage Offences Act, acting under be laid and tried in the county where the fact this act ^^ committed, and shall, in England, Ireland, or Scotland, be commenced within six months Notice of after the fact committed, and not otherwise ; and *°'''"^ notice in writing of such action and of the cause thereof shall be given to the defendant or defender one month at least before the commencement of General the action ; and in any such action brought in iBBuo. England or Ireland the defendant may plead the general issue, and give this act and the special matter in evidence, at any trial to be had there- upon, and in Scotland the defender may insist on Tender of all relevant defences ; and no plaintiff or pursuer amends, &c gj^aU recover in any such action if tender of suffi- cient amends shall have been made before such action brought, or if a sufficient sum of money shall have been paid into court after such action brought, by or on behalf of the defendant or defender ; and if, in England or Ireland, a verdict shall pass for the defendant, or the plaintiff shall become nonsuit, or discontinue any such action after issue joined, or if, upon demurrer or other- wise, judgment shall be given against the plaintiff, or if, in Scotland, the verdict shall be for the defender, or if the pursuer shall abandon the action, or the court shall dismiss it as irrelevant or improperly laid, in every such case the defen- dant or defender shall recover his full costs as between attoi-ney and client, and have the liie remedy for the same as any defendant or defender has by law in other cases ; and though a verdict shall be given for the plaintiff or pursuer in any such action, such plaintiff or pursuer shall not have costs against the defendant or defender, unless the judge before whom the trial shall be shall certify his approbation of the action. Trial of 34. AU high crimes and offences, and crimes offences in an,j offences, against this act, which may be committed in Scotland, shall be proceeded against 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 99. 193 and tried according to the rules and procedure of the criminal law of Scotland; and all pro- ceedings by this act made competent before any justice or justices, and all and every the powers and authorities by this act given to or conferred upon any such justice or justices, shall, in Scot- land, be competent before and may be exercised by any sheriff, magistrate, or justice of the peace. 35. In the case of every felony punishable Punishment under the act, every principal in the second "ntheB^ond degree, and every accessory before the fact, shall degree, and be punishable in the same manner as the pria- '^°^^°™^- cipal in the first degree is by this act punishable ; and every accessory after the fact to any felony punishable under this act shall be liable to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 36. AU indictable offences mentioned in this offences act which shall be committed within the' juris- ""•S™"^'* diction of the Admiralty of England or Ireland jurisdiction shall be deemed to be offences of the same nature AdmS&ity. and liable to the same punishments as if they had been committed upon the land in England or Ireland, and may be dealt with, inquired of, tried, and determined in any county or place in England or Ireland in which the offender shall be apprehended or be in custody, in the same manner in all respects as if the same had been actually committed in that county or place, and in any indictment for any such offence, or for being accessory to any such oii'enoe, the venue in the margin shall be the same as if such offence had been committed in such county or place, and the offence itself shall be averred to have been committed " on the high seas ; " and where any of the crimes and offences, or high crimes and offences, mentioned in this act, shall be com- mitted at sea, and the vessel in which the same shaU be committed shall be registered in Soot- 194 Coinage Ofeneei Act, land, or touoh at any part thereof, the courts of criminal law of Scotland may inquire, try and determine the same in the same manner as if such crime and offence, or high crime and offence, had been committed in Scotland ; provided that nothing herein contained shall alter or affect any of the laws relating to the government of Her Majesty's land or naval forces. What shall 37. Where any person shall have been con- hesnffloient yjcted of any offence against this act, or any oonTiotion former act relating to the coin, and shall after- Tioiwoftenoe ''^ards be indicted for any offence against this act committed subsequent to such conviction, it shall be sufficient in any such indictment, after charging such subsequent offence, to state the substance and effect only (omitting the formal part) of the indictment and conviction for the previous offence ; and a certificate containing the substance and effect only (oraitting the formal part) of the indictment and conviction for the previous offence, purporting to be signed by the clerk of the court or other officer having or pur- porting to have the custody of the records of the court where the offender was first convicted, or by the deputy of such clerk or officer, shall, upon , proof of the identity of the person of the offender, be sufficient evidence of the previous conviction, without proof of the signature or official character or authority of the person appearing to have signed the same, or of his custody or right to the custody of the records of the court, and for every such certificate a fee of six shillings and eight- pence, and no more, shall be demanded or taken ; When the and the proceedings upon any indictment for oon^otion is committing any offence after a previous con- on ttf Sf viotion or convictions shall be as follows ; (that is to say,) the offender shall, in the first instance, be arraigned upon so much only of the indict- ment as charges the subsequent offence, and if he 24 4- 25 Vict cap. 99. 195 plead not guilty, or if tlie court order a plea of not guilty to be entered on Ms behalf, the jury shall be charged, in the first instance, to inquire concerning such subsequent offence only ; and if they find him guilty, or if on arraignment he plead guilty, he shall then, and not before, be asked whether he had been previously convicted as alleged in the indictment, and if he answer that he had been so previously convicted the court may proceed to sentence him accordingly, but if he deny that he had been so previously convicted, or stand mute of malice, or will not answer directly to such question, the jury shall then be charged to inquire concerning such pre- vious conviction or convictions, and in such case it shall not be necessary to swear the jury again, but the oath already taken by them shall for all purposes be deemed to extend to such last- mentioned inquiry : provided that if upon the trial of any person for any such subsequent offence such person shall give evidence of his good character, it shall be lawful for the pro- secutor, in answer thereto, to give evidence of the conviction of such person for the previous offence or offences, before such verdict of guilty shall be returned, and the jury shall inquire con- cerning such previous conviction or convictions at the same time that they inquire concerning such subsequent offence. (*) 38. Whenever any person shall be convicted of Fine and any indictable misdemeanor punishable under this ^Mptog the act, the court may, if it shall think fit, in addition peaea ; in . -. - *' p ,, • 1 . 1 i.1 ■ what cases, to or m lieu of any of the punishments by tms (=) On the trial of an indictment for felonious possession of counterfeit coin with intent to utter the same after a previous conviction, the course of proceeding at the trial Is first to try that part of the offence which relates to the possession, and then, if the prisoner be found guilty, to tir him tor the previous conviction : (Seg. v. Martin, 21 L. T. Sep. 469.) K 2 196 Coinage Offences Act, act authorised, fine the offender, and require him fo enter into his own recognizances, and to find sureties, both or .either, for keeping the peace and being of good behaviour ; and in case of any felony punishable under this act the court may, if it shall think fit, require the offender to enter into his own recognizances, and to find sureties, both or either, for keeping the peace, in addition to any punishment by this act authorised : provided that no person shall be imprisoned under this clause for not finding sureties for any period exceeding one year. Hard labour. 39. Whenever imprisonment, with or without hard labour, may be awarded for an indictable offence under this act, the court may sentence the offender to be imprisoned, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour, in the common gaol or house of correction. Solitary 40. Whenever solitary confinement may be confinement, awarded 'for any offence under this act, the court , may direct the offender to be kept in solitary confinement for any portion or portions of his imprisonment, or of his imprisonment with hard labour, not exceeding one month at any one time, and not exceeding three months in any one year. Summary 41. Every offence hereby made punishable on to EnglS summary conviction may be prosecuted in England may be in the manner directed by the act of the session ii'&i2Viot holdenin the eleventh and twelfth years of Queen l' *f 'nd ^ ™ Victoria, chapter forty-three, and may be prose- under the cuted in Ireland before two or more justices of i4^& 16 Vict, ^.jjg peace, or one metropolitan or stipendiary magistrate, in the manner directed by the act of the session holden in the fourteenth and fifteenth years of Queen Victoria, chapter ninety-three, or in such other manner as may be directed by any act that may be passed for like purposes ; and all 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 99. 197 provisions contained in tlie said acts shall be ap- plicable to sucb prosecutions in tlie same manner as if tbey were incorporated in tMs act : provided, Except in tbat nothing in this act contained shall in any ^™4etr™'* nianner alter or effect any enactment relating to polltanpollca procedure in the case of any offence punishable '*'^'"'''''- on summary conviction within the city of London or the metropolitan police district, for the recovery or application of any penalty or forfeiture for any such offence. 42. In all prosecutions for any offence against oost ot this act in England, which shall be conducted under p™««™«om the direction of the solicitors of Her Majesty's Treasury, the court before which such offence shall be prosecuted or tried shall allow the expenses of the prosecution in all respects as in cases of felony ; and in all prosecutions for any such offence in England which shall not be so conducted it shall be lawful for such court, in case a conviction shall take place, but not otherwise, to allow the ex- ■ penses of the prosecution in like manner ; and every order for the payment of such costs shall be made out, and the sum of money mentioned therein paid and repaid, upon the same terms and in the same manner in all respects as in cases of felony. 43. This act shall commence and take effect on Commence- the first day of November one thousand eight "™* °^ "'■ hundred and sixty-one. 198 vn. OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT. 24 & 25 Vict. cap. 100. An Act to consolidate and amend the Statute Law of England and Ireland relating to Offences against the Person. — [6th August, 1861.] Whebbas it is expedient to consolidate and amend the statute law of England and Ireland relating to offences against the person : be it enacted by tbe Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parlia- ment assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : Homicide. Murder. !• Whosoever shall be convicted of murder shall suffer death as a felon. Sentence for 2. Upon every conviction for murder the court murder. gball pronounce sentence of death, and the same may be carried into execution, and all other pro- ceedings upon such sentence and in respect thereof may be had and taken, in the same manner in all respects as sentence of death might have been pronounced and carried into execution, and all other proceedings thereupon and in respect thereof might have been had and taken, before the passing of this act, upon a conviction for any other felony 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 100. 199 for which the prisoner might have been sentenced to suffer death as a felon ('). 3. The body of every person executed for Body to be murder shall be buried within the precincts of the prison.' ' prison in which he shall have been last confined after conviction, and the sentence of 'the court shall so direct. 4. AU persons who shall conspire, confederate, conspiring and agree to murder any person, whether he be a " commit^ subject of Her Majesty or not, and whether he be murder, within the Queen's dominions or not, and whosor ever shall solicit, encourage, persuade, or endeavour to persuade, or shall propose to any person, to murder any other person, whether he be a subject of Her Majesty or not, and whether he be within the Queen's dominions or not, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not more than ten and not less than three years, — or to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 5. Whosoever shaU be convicted of man- Mansiangb- slaughter shall be liable, at the discretion of the '°''' court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, or to pay such fine as the court shall award, in addition to or without any such other discretionary punishment as aforesaid. 6. In any indictment for murder or man- indictment slaughter, or for being an accessory to any murder 0°''^"'^°'' or manslaughter, it shaU not be necessary to set slanghtet forth the manner in which or the means by which (') As regards the mode of carrying out the sentence of death, see the 31 Vict. 0. 24, "The Capital Punishment Amendment Act, 1868," post. 200 Offences against the Person Act,_ the deatli of the deceased was caused, but it shall be sufficient in any indictment for murder to charge that the defendant did feloniously, wiKully, and of his malice aforethought kill and murder the deceased ; and it shall be sufficient in any indictment for manslaughter to charge that the defendant did feloniously kill and slay the de- ceased ; and it shall be sufficient in any indict- ment against any accessory to any murder or manslaughter to charge the principal with the murder or manslaughter (as the case may be) in the manner hereinbefore specified, and then to charge the defendant as an accessory in the manner heretofore used and accustomed. Excusable 7. No punishment or forfeiture shall be in- ™'°' *■ CTirred by any person who shall kill another by misfortune or in his own defence, or in any other manner without felony. fettt 8. Every offence which before the commence- ment of the act of the ninth year of King George the Fourth, chapter thirty-one, would have amounted to petit treason, shall be deemed to be murder only, and no greater offence ; and all persons guilty in respect thereof, whether as principals or as accessories, shall be dealt with, indicted, tried, and punished as principals • and accessories in murder. Mnrderor 9. Where any murder or manslaughter shall ™atopfd.' l3e committed on land out of the United Kingdom, whether within the Queen's dominions or without, and whether the person killed were a subject of Her Majesty or not, every offence committed by any subject of Her Majesty, in respect of any such case, whether the same shall amount to the offence of murder or of manslaughter, or of being accessory to murder or manslaughter, may be dealt with, inquired of, tried, determined, and punished in any county or place in England or 24: 4- 25 Vtct. cap. 100. 201 Ireland in wHcli such, person shall be appre- hended or be in custody, in the same manner in all respects as if such offence had been actually committed in that county or place ; provided that nothing herein contained shall prevent any person from being tried in any place out of England or Ireland for any murder or manslaughter com- mitted out of England or Ireland, in the same manner as such person might have been tried before the passing of this act. ■ 10. Wh.ere any person, being feloniously Proviaion , . , . J i.1. ■ 1. i , , ■' tor the trial stricken, poisoned, or otherwise hurt upon the of murder sea, or at any place out of England or Ireland, o^nd man- shall die of such stroke, poisoning, or hurt in where the England or Ireland, or, being feloniously stricken, ^^„* °f ' poisoned, or otherwise hurt at any place in aoa't only England or Ireland, shall die of such stroke, England or- poisoning, or hurt upon the sea, or at any place Iceland, out of England or Ireland, every offence com- mitted in respect of any such case, wlj.ether the same shall amount to the offence of murder or of manslaughter, or of . being accessory to murder or manslaughter, may be dealt ' with, incjuired of, tried, determined, and punished in the county or place in England or Ireland in which such death, stroke, poisoning, or hurt shall happen, in the same manner in all respects as if such offence had been wholly committed in that county or place. Attempts to murder. 11. Whosoever shall administer to or cause to Adminiater- be administered to or to be taken by any person "^^omajng any poison or other destructive thing, or shall with intent by any means whatsoever wound or cause any grievous bodily harm to any person with intent in aiiy of the cases aforesaid to commit murdet, shall he guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for k3 202 Offences against the Person Act, any term not less than three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or with- out solitary confinement. Destroying 12. Whosoever, by the explosion of gunpowder TbuiStag"^ or other explosive substance, shall destroy or with gun- damage any buUdinff with intent to commit i30wu.Gr witii ' ' o ' J o intent to murder, shall be guilty of felony, and being murder. convicted thereof shaU be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two' years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. Setting Are 13. Whosoever shall set fire to any ship or awayTs^^ ^®^^®^ °^ ^^^ V^^ thereof, or any part of the witii intent tacHe, apparel, or furniture thereof, or any goods to mur er. ^^ chattels being therein, or shall cast away or destroy any ship or vessel, with intent in any of such cases to commit murder, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. Attempting 14. Whosoever shall attempt to administer to terp^on^or °^ ^^ attempt to cause to be administered to or shooting or to be taken by any person any poison or other tostaot'of destructive thing, or shall shoot at any person, attempting q-j. gjiall, by drawing a trigger or in any other &o., with' manner, attempt to discharge any kind of loaded murder^ arms at any person, or shall attempt to drown, suffocate, or strangle any person, with intent, in any of the cases aforesaid, to commit murder, shall, whether any bodily injury be effected or not, be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of th« 24 ^ 25 Vict. aap. 100. 203 court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 15. Whosoever shall, by any means other than By any other those specified in any of the preceding sections "fempting of this act, attempt to commit murder, shall be *" commit guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than "three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or vrithout solitary confinement. Letters threatening to murder. 16. Whosoever shall maliciously send, deliver. Sending or utter, or directly or indirectly cause to be l^S^atening received, knowing the contents thereof, any letter to murder. or writing threatening to kill or murder any person, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding ten years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or vrithout hard labour, and with or vnthout solitary confinement, ' and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Acts causing or tending to cause Danger to Life or bodily Harm. 17. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously impeding a prevent or impede any person, being on board of deavonring or having quitted any ship or vessel which shall ^g™,,„^ be in distress, or wrecked, stranded, or oast on eMpwreok. shore, in his endeavour to save his life, or shall unlawfully and maliciously prevent or impede 204 Ofences against the Person Act, any person in ids endeavour to save the life of any such person as in this section first aforesaid, shall be guilty gf felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, ■with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. Shooting or 18.(') Whosoever shall tmlawfully and mali- to'sSo^o^ ciously by any means whatsoever wound or cause wounding any grievous bodily harm to any person, or shoot to do at any person, or, by drawing a trigger or in any boSIyhaim. o^^^r manner, attempt to discharge any kind of loaded arms at any person, with intent, in any of the cases aforesaid, to maim, disfigure, or disable any person, or to do some other grievous bodily harm to any person, or with intent to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detainer of any person, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. What shall 19. Any gun, pistol, or other arms which shall Sed anna. ^® loaded in the barrel with gunpower or any other explosive substance, and ball, shot, slug, or other destructive material, shall be deemed to be loaded arms within the meaning of this act, although the attempt to discharge the same may (^) Shootmg into a a'owiS. — A person who fires a pistol at a group of persons, not aiming at any one in particular but intending generally to do grievous bodily harm, and severely wounds one of the group, may be indicted and convicted for feloniously shooting and wounding the person injured with Intent to do grievous bodily harm : (Reg. v. Fretwell, 10 L. T. Eep. 428; 3S L. J. M. G. 128.) 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 100. 205 fail from want of proper priming or from any other cause. 20.(^) Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- inflicting ciously wound or inflict any grievous bodily harm ^El ^ja, upon any other person, either with or without any or without weapon or instrument, shall be guilty of a mis- ''^''i'™- demeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 21. Whosoever shall, by any means whatsoever, Attempting attempt to choke, suffocate, or strangle any other *„ o^aer'to"'' person, or shall, by any means calculated to choke, commit any suffocate, or strangle, attempt to render any other ^0^!"'° person insensible, unconscious, or incapable of re- sistance, with intent in any of such cases thereby to enable himself or any other person to commit, or with intent in apy of such cases thereby to assist any other person in comnaitting, any indict- able offence, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life, or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 22. Whosoever shall unlawfully apply or ad- using minister to or cause to be taken by, or attempt to i^'°J^'°""' apply or administer to or attempt to cause to be commit any administered to or taken by, any person, any oflence. chloroform, laudanum, or other stupefying or over- powering drug, matter, or thing, with intent in any of such cases thereby to enable himseK or (^) Maliciously wounding — Common assault. — Upon an in- dictment under sect, 20 for unlawfully and maliciously wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm, a verdict for a common assault may be returned : (^Reg. v. Canwdl, 20 L. T. Eep. 402.) 206 Offences against the Person Act, any other peraon to commit, or witli intent in any of such cases thereby to assist any other person in committing any indictable offence, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any other term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. MaUciousiy 23. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously .ta™^iBo"" administer to or cause to be admiuistered to or fta, so as to taken by any other person any poison or other lite or inflict destructive or noxious thing, so as thereby to en- iomy hann. danger the life of such person, or so as thereby to inflict upon such person any grievous bodily harm, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted there- of shaU be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceed- ing ten years and not less than three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. MalloiouBly 24. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously tag poiB^" administer to or cause to be administered to or &o., with taken by any other . person any poison or other intent to J , / , • •' • iT.. -ii ■ J. J. J. ■ ■ injure, destructive or noxious thing, with intent to injure, anloylny"^ aggrieve, or annoy such person, shall be guilty of otherperson. a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. If the jury 25. If, upon the trial of any person for any aatSfledthat felony in the last but one preceding section men- Sr''e™iB° tioned, the jury. shall not be satisfied that such gniity of person is guilty thereof, but shall be satisfied that guaty o?"' Ii6 is guilty of any misdemeanor in the last pre- miBde- ceding section mentioned, then and in every such meanorthey Ti ■ -i ii ■, i ^ may find case the jury may acquit the accused oi such 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 100. 207 felony, and find him guilty of such misdemeanor, him guilty and thereupon he shall be liable to be punished ^<'°^i^^y- in the same manner as if convicted upon an in- dictment for such misdemeajior. 26.('') Whosoever, being legally liable, either as Not a master or mistress, to provide for any appren- ^p™n«fea tice or servant, necessary food, clothing, or or BervantB lodging, shaU wilfully and without lawful excuse ^., whereby refuse or neglect to provide the same or shall ^^ ^ ^^^^ unlawfully and maliciously do or cause to be done any bodily harm to any such apprentice or servant, so that the life of such apprentice or servant shall be endangered, or the health of such apprentice or servant shall have been or shall be likely to be permanently injured, shall be guilty of a mis- demeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 27.(^) Whosoever shall unlawfully abandon or Exposing expose any chUd, being under the ■ age of two whereby life endangered. (*) Master and servant;— Neglect topi'ovide sufficient food. — A master is not criminally liable for the death of a servant not of tender years, although the death was caused by the insufficiency and badness of the food and lodging provided by him for her, unless the servant was of such weak intellect as to be helpless and unable to take care of herself, or was under such restraint as to be unable to withdraw herself from her maater's dominion : (lieg. v. Charlotte Smith, 12 L. T. Eep. 608.) («) Expomre— What amounts to.— The mother (one of the prisoners) told the putative father before the birth of an illegitimate ohUd that she would father it on him and he would have to pay for it. He said, " I will not pay for it, but if you send it to me I will keep it." About five weeks after its birth the prisoner put the child into a hamper carefully wrapped up, and left it at a railway station and paid the fare. The hamper was addressed, and the words "with care, to be delivered immediately," added. The transit and delivery occupied about an hour. When opened, the child was alive. It was taken to the workhouse and lived for three weeks afterwards, when it died from causes 208 Offences against the Person Act, years, whereby tlie life of suoli child shall be endangered, or the health of such child shall have been or shall be likely to be permanently injured, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. OanBing 28. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously, bodily injury , " . . . j j.1. i ■ by Bun- by the explosion of gunpowder or other explosive powder. substance, burn, maim, disfigure, disable, or do any grievous bodily harm to any person, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary oonflne- ment, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. Causing 29. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maU- t™xDiod" ciously cause any gunpowder or other explosive or sending substance to explode, or send or deliver to or peS an cause to be taken or received by any person any explosive explosive substance or any other dangerous or tbrowing' noxious thing, or put or lay at any place, or Mdfon^a "^^^ o"" throw at or upon or otherwise apply to person, with any person, any corrosive fluid or any destruo- grievous tive or explosive substance, with intent in any bodily harm, pf ^j^g gases aforesaid to burn, maim, disfigure, or disable any person, or to do some grievous bodily harm to any person, shall, whether any bodily injury be effected or not, be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shaU be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal not attributable to the condact of the prisoners. Held, by a majority of the judges, that this was a case of abandonment and exposure of a child within the 27th section : (Beg. v. Fal/emgham and amther, 21 L. T. Eep. 679 ; 29 L. J. M. C. 47.) 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 100. 209 servitude for life or for anyterm not less tlian ttree years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 30. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- Placing ciously place or throw in, into, upon, against, or l^^a^ °' near any building, ship, or vessel amy gunpowder ^"jjf -Q^nt or other explosive substance, with intent to do to do bodily any bodily injury to any person, shall, whether Siy^ereon. or not any explosion take place, and whether or not any bodily injury be effected, be guilty of felony, ' and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding four- teen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any tenn not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. 31. Whosoever shall set or place, or cause to Settini be set or placed, any spring gun, man trap, or &a'^ith'°° other engine calculated to destroy human hfe or j"^"' '° inflict grievous bodily harm, with the intent that grievous the same or whereby the same may destroy or ^°^J ^™^ inflict grievous bodily harm upon a trespasser or other person coming in contact therewith, shall be gmlty of a misdemeanor, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion . of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour ; and whosoever shall knowingly and wilfully permit any such spring gun, man trap, or other engine which may have been set or placed in any place then being in or afterwards coming into his possession or occupation by some other person to continue so set or placed, shall be 210 Offences against the Person Act, deemed to have set and placed such gun, trap, or engme with such intent as aforesaid : provided that nothing in this section contained shall ex- tend to make it illegal to set or place any gin or trap such as may have been or may be usually set or placed with the intent of destroying vermin : provided also, that nothing in this section shall be deemed to make it unlawful to set or place or cause to be set or placed, or to be continued set or placed, from sunset to sunrise, any spring gun, man trap, or other engine which shall be set or placed, or caused or continued to be set or placed, in a dwelling house, for the protection thereof. Placing: 32. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously ^arkilway, P'^* °'' t^irow upon or across any railway any withmtent -wood, stone, or other matter or thing, or shall paasengors. unlawfully and maliciously take up, remove, or displace any rail, sleeper, or other matter or thing belonging to any railway, or shall unlaw- fully and maliciously turn, move, or divert any points or other machinery belonging to any rail- way, or shall unlawfully and maliciously make or show, hide or remove, any signal or Ught upon or near to any railway, or shall unlawfully and maliciously do or cause to be done any other matter or thing, with intent, in any of the cases aforesaid, to endanger the safety of any person travelling or being upon such railway, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and if a male under the age of sixteen years with or without whipping. Casting 33. Whosoever shall unlawfully and mali- npon'a*°'' oiously throw, or cause to fall or strike, at, railway against, into, or upon any engine, tender, carriage, with intent or truck used upon any railway, any wood, stone. 24 # 25 Vict cap. 100. 211 or other matter or thing, with intent to injure or to endanger endanger the safety of any person being in or any^^mon ' upon such engine, tender, carriage, or truck, or in therein, or upon any other engine, tender, carriage, or truck of any train of which such first-mentioned engine, tender, carriage, or truck shall form part, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 34. Whosoever, by any unlawful act, or by any Doing or wilful omission or neglect, shall endanger or cause °™J^^ ^g to be endangered the safety of any person con- endanger veyed or being in or upon a railway, or shall aid by^raiiTOy. or assist therein, shall be guilty of a misde- meanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable at the discretion of -the court, to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard laljour. 3.5. Whosoever, having the charge of any Driyers of carriage or vehicle, shall by wanton or furious ^"iJj?*!' driving or racing, or other wilful naisconduct, or persons by by wilful neglect, do or cause to be done any a™Ting. bodily harm to any person whatsoever, shall be guUty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. Assaults. 36. Whosoever shall, by threats or force, ob- ObBtraofflng struct or prevent, or endeavour to obstruct or a clergyman prevent, any clergyman or other minister in or ^^^^^ j^ from celebrating divine service or otherwise offi- the dis- ciating in any church, chapel, meeting house, or Sis^duties. other place of divine worship, or in or from the performance of his duty in the lawful burial of the dead in any churchyard or other burial place. 212 Offences against the Person Act, or shall strike or offer any violence to, or shall, upon any civil process, or under tte pretence of executing any civil process, arrest any cler'gjmian or other minister who is engaged in, or to the know- ledge of the offender is about to engage in, any of the rites or duties in this section aforesaid, or who to the knowledge of the offender shall be going to perform the same or returning from the perform- ance thereof, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the dis- cretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, wiih or without hard labour. Assaulting a 37. Whosoever shall assault and strike or &c^ on wound any magistrate, omcer, or other person account of -whatsoever lawfully authorised, in or on account his pveserv- „ ,t_ . j. i • ■, , • • , i ing wreck. 01 the exercise ot his duty m or concerning the preservation of any vessel in distress, or of any vessel, goods, or effects wrecked, stranded, or cast on shore, or l3niig under water, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. ARsanitwith SS-C*) Whosoever shall assault any person with commit" intent to commit felony, or shall assault, resist, («) Wrong constable eaxcuMng warrant. — The defendant was convicted in a penalty with costa, or to he imprisoned seven days. The penalty not having been paid, a warrant was issued for his apprehension, addressed " to the constable of G." It was given to a county police constable to exe- cute. While he was attempting to apprehend the defendant the defendant resisted and wounded the constable. Held, that a county policeman had no authority to execute it, it being addressed to the parish constable, and that the appre- hension was therefore illegal : (ifejr. v. Sanders, 16 L; T. Bep. 331 ! Law Rep. 1 C. 0. Ees. 75.) Assault ■ — Exeeution of his duty — Character of party airrested. — Upon an indictment for assaulting A constable in 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 100. 213 or wilfully obstruct any peace officer in the due felony or on execution of his duty, or any person acting in aid ^^^jg g^ of such officer, or stall assault any person with intent to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detainer of himself or of any other person for any offence, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being cohyicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned, for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 39. Whosoever shall beat, or use any violence Aseauits or threat of violence to any person, with intent to'obatraot the execution of his duty, it appeared that the assault was committed whilst the constable was attempting to arrest the accused upon suspicion of having stolen some larch trees (under the value of 12.') which the accused was carry- ing. To show that the constable was justified in suspecting the accused, the counsel for the prosecution asked the con- stable in his examination in chief, " What did you know had been the prisoner's previous character .' " The constable replied, "I knew him to be a very bad character," and was proceeding to mention previous convictions, when he was stopped, on the ground that parol evidence of such con- victions was inadmissible ; but in answer to a question put by the counsel for the prosecution, he said he had seen the accused in the Court of Quarter Sessions, and before the magistrates on one occasion. Held, that although the con- stable might be examined in chief as to the general charac- ter of the accused, he could not be asked in chief as to the grounds of his suspicion, and therefore that the question and answer as to the grounds of the constable's suspicion were improperly admitted : (Reg. v. Tvberjield, 11 L. T. Rep. 385.) Unhviful apprehension. — While the defendant was using threatening, language to a third person a constable in plain clothes came up and interfered. The defendant struck the constable with his fist, and there was a struggle between them; the constable went away for assistance and was absent for an hour; he changed his plain clothes for his uniform and returned to the defendant's house with three other constables. They forced the door and entered the house. The defendant refused to come down, and threat- ened to kill the first man who came up to take him, and he wounded one of them in the struggle. Held, that the apprehension of the prisoner at the time was unlawful and that he could not be convicted of wounding the constable with intent to prevent liis lawful apprehension : (Reg. v. Marsden, 18 L. T. Eep. 298 ; Law Bep. 1 0. 0. Ees. 131.) 214 Offences against the Person Act, thesaioof to deter or hinder him from buying,- seliuig, or freepMsi^e. otherwise disposing of, or to compel him to buy, sell, or other^^se dispose of, any wheat or other grain, flour, meal, malt, or potatoes, in any market or other place, or shaU beat or use any such violence or threat to any person having the care or charge of any wheat or other grain, &ovx, meal, malt, or potatoes, whilst on the way to or from any' city, market town, or other place, with intent to stop the conveyance of the same, shall, on conviction thereof before two justices of the peace, be liable to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour in the common gaol or house of correction for any term not exceeding three months ; pro- vided that no person who shall be punished for any such offence by virtue of this section shall be punished for the same offence by virtue of any other law whatsoever. Assaults on 40. Whosoever shall unlawfully and with force seamen, So. jjjjj^gj. gr prevent any seaman, keelman, or caster from working at or exercising his lawful trade, business, or occupation, or shall beat or use any violence to any such person with intent to hinder or prevent him from working at or exercising the same, shall, on conviction thereof before two justices of the peace, be liable to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour in the common gaol or house of correction, for any term not exceeding three months : provided that no person who shall be punished for any such offence by reason of this section shall be punished for the same offence by virtue of any other law whatsoever. Assaults 41. Whosoever, in pursuance of any unlawful oomStoS'"" combination or conspiracy to raise the rate of tion. wages, or of any unlawful combination or con- spiracy respecting any trade, business, or manu- facture, or respecting any person concerned or employed therein, shall unlawfully assault any person, shall be gmlty of a misdemeanor, and i 24 4- 2g Viot. cap. 100. 215 being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 42.('') Where any person shall unlawfully assault Persona or beat any other person, two justices of the aSy SmmL peace, upon complaint by or on behalf of the assault or party aggrieved, may hear and determine such may be offence, and the offender shall, upon conviction OT^SnpeiM thereof before them, at the discretion of the by two justices, either be committed to the common gaol SjSy'Sle^ or house of correction, there to be imprisoned ^nd oosta with or without hard labour for any term not ing Bi. exceeding two months, or else shall forfeit and pay such fine as shall appear to them to be meet, not exceeding, together vsdth costs (if ordered), the sum of five pounds ; and if such fine as shall be so awarded, together with the costs (if ordered), shall not be paid, either immediately after the conviction or within such period as the said justices shall at the time of _the conviction appoint, they may commit the offender to the common gaol or house of correction, there to be imprisoned, with or without hard labour, for any term not exceeding two months, unless such fine and costs be sooner paid. 43. When any person shall be charged before Persons two justices of the peace with an assault or °™^y'24d' battery upon any male child whose age shall not assaults on in the opinion of such justices exceed fourteen toys under O This section effects a most important and judicious alteration of the old law. By the 9 Geo. 4, o. 31, s. 27, justices in the first instance could only impose a fine, and the offender could be imprisoned only upon default of payment, and that imprisonmeilt could not be accompanied with hard labour. By the present section they have a discretion in the first instance either to impose a fine or commit to prison with or without hard labour. Sard labour also may be given where a party is committed to prison in default of payment of the fine. 216 Oj^nces against the Person Act, fourteen years, or upon any female, eitter upon the oom- mayta'*^° plaint of the party aggrieved or otherwise, the i™p™oned said justices, M the assault or battery is of such an aggravated nature that it cannot in their opinion be sufficiently punished under the pro- visions hereinbefore contained as to common assaults and batteries, may proceed to hear and determine the same in a summai}' way, and, if the same be proved, may convict the person accused ; and every such offender shall be liable to be imprisoned in the common gaol or house of correction, with or without hard labour, for any period not exceeding six months, or to pay a fine not exceeding (together with costs) the sum of twenty pounds, and in default of pa3Tnent to be imprisoned in the common gaol or house of correction for any period not exceeding six* months, unless such fbe and costs be sooner paid, and, if the justices shall so think fit, in any of the said oases, shall be bound to keep tjie peace and be of good behaviour for any period not exceeding six months from the expiration of such , sentence. H the 44.(*) If the justices, upon the hearing of any Smte8the° ^^°^ ^^^ °^ assault or battery upon the merits, complaint, -^yhere the complaint was preferred by or on the make^out a behalf of the party aggrieved, under either of the ttat'effeot'" ^^^ ^^° preceding sections, shall deem the offence (*) Cei'tlficate, when to he granted. — The granting of this certificate is a ministerial act, and not a judicial one, and a magistrate having heard a charge of assault and dismissed it on any one of the grounds stated i^ bound to grant a certifi- cate ; and it need not be applied for or drawn up in the presence of the parties: (Haiicoeh v. Lowes, 28 L. J. M. 0. 196 i 33 L. T. Eep. 105.) The certificate need not be granted immediately upon the dismissal of the complaint if not applied for. If, however, it be granted immediately upon being asked for, though the application for it is not until some days after the hearing and dismissal, that is a sufficient compliance with the section : QCosier v. Betherington, 28 L. J. M. C. 198 i 33 L. T. Kep. 106.) Where, however, the case was 24 Sf 25 Vkt. cap. 100. 217 not to be proved, or shall find the assault or battery to have been justified, or so trifling as not to merit any punishment, and shall accordingly dismiss the complaint, they shall forthwith make out a certificate under their hands stating the fact of such dismissal, and shall deliver such certifi- cate to the party against whom the complaint was preferred. 45.(^) If any person against whom any such Oertifloate of complaint as in either of the last three preceding aSau be™ sections mentioned shall have been preferred by ''5f *" *°y or on the behalf of the party aggrieved, shall proceedings, have obtained such certificate, or, having been convicted, shall have paid the whole amount adjudged to be paid, or shall have suffered the imprisonment or imprisonment with hard labour awarded, in every such case he shall be released from all further or other proceedings, civil or criminal, for the same cause. 46. Provided, that in case the justices shall These find the assault or battery complained of to have Jot™ apply been accompanied by any attempt to commit to certain felony, or shall be of opinion that the same is, from any other circumstances, a fit subject for a prosecution by indictment, they shall abstain from any adjudication thereupon, and shaU deal with dismissed in November and the certificate was not granted until the following January it was held that it was no bar to an action: (R. v. EoWmon, 12 Ad. & EU 672; 10 L. J. M. • 0. 9.) See this case observed upon by Lord Campbell in Hancock v. Lowes (stipi-a). (») SjJ)segueni indictment for manslaiugliier. — Although a conviction of an assault is a bar to an indictment for felo- niously stabbing upon the same trasnaotion (S^. v. Waiker, 2 M. & B. 446), or for unlawful wounding, or for an assault occasioning actual bodily harm arising out of ^ the same circumstances (Bey. v. Elfingtm, 9 Cox Crim. Caa. 86; 31 L. J. M. C. 56), it is not a bar to a subsequent mdictment for manslaughter upon the death of the man assaulted con- sequent upon the same assault : (Beg. V. Morris, 10 Cox Cnm. Cas. 480; 36 L. J. M. 0. 84.) L 218 Offencis against the Person Act, the case in all respects in the same manner as if they had no authority finally to hear and determine the same : pBovided also, that nothing herein contained shall authorise any justices to hear and determine any case of assault or battery in which any question shall arise as to the title to any lands, tenements, or hereditaments or any interest therein or accruing therefrom, or as to any bank- ruptcy or insolvency, or any execution under the process of any court of justice. Asaanlt ^7. Whosoever shall be convicted upon an in- oooMioning dictment of any assault oefiasioning actual bodily harm, shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard Common labour; and whosoever shall be convicted upon assault. an indictment for a common assault shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be impri- soned for any term not exceeding one year, with or without liard labour. Hape, Abduction, and Defilement of Women. iiape. 48.(^'') Whosoever shall be convicted of the crime of rape .shall be guilty of felony, and being ('") What amoimts to. — The proaeoutrix, with her baby in her arms, was lying in bed between sleeping and waking, and her husband was asleep beside her. She was completely awakened' by a man having connexion with her and push- ing the baby aside. Almost directly she was completely awakened, she found the man was not her husband, and she awoke him. Held, that a conviction for a rape upon this evidence could not be sustained: (Reg. v. Barrow, 19 L. T. Bep. 293 ; Law Eep. 1 C. C. Kee. 1S6.) Sape upon cm idiot. — Upon an indictment for rape, there must be evidence that the connexion was against the will of the female, or without her consent. In a case, therefore, of , alleged rape upon an idiot girl, the only evidence being that of the fact of the connexion aud the- imbecile state of mind of the girl, aud there being no appearance of force having been used, the Court held that there was no case to go to the jury ; (Jteg. v. Fletcher, 14 L. T. Eep. 573.) 24 ^ 25 Vict. mp. 100. 219 convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or withouthard labour. 49. Whosoever shall, by false pretences, false Procuring representations, or other fraudulent means, pro- men^^ofW cure any woman or girl under the age of twenty- under age. one years to have illicit carnal connexion with any man, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 50. Whosoever shall unlawfully and carnally Oaraaiiy know and abuse any girl under the age of ten ^°?una|r°' ypars, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- <«n years of victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of ^^°' the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 51.0^) Whosoever shall unlawfully and carnally Camaiiy knowing a Rape upon an idiot— Suffidenoy of emdence. — The prisoner was convicted of a rape upon the prosecutrix, who was an apparent idiot. She proved the act done, and said that it was wrong, but that she said nothing to the prisoner, and that she did not do anything to him, and that she did not like to hurt anybody. The constable told the prisoner that he was charged with committing a rape upon the prosecu- trix and against her will. The prisoner, in answer to that, said, "Yes, I did, and I'm very sorry for it." Held, that there was evidence to sustain the conviction ; (Reg. v. Preesy, 17 L. T.Eep. 295.) Attempting to oomfmt — Aidimg and abetting. — H. was indicted for rape, and W. for aiding and abetting. Both were ac- quitted of felony, but H. was found guilty of attempting to commit the rape, and W. of aiding H. in the attempt. Held, that W. was properly convicted : (Sej. v. Hapgoodand Wyatt, 21 L. T.'Eep. 679.) (") Carnal Jmowledge o/agirlundertmelve— Assault — Indict- ment.— A.V. indictment charged that G. in and upon D., a l2 offences. 220 Offences against the Person Act, pri between know and abuse any girl being above tlxe age of ten and ten years and under the age of twelve years sHall twelve. jjg guilty of a sitnisdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. Attempt to 52. Whosoever shall be convicted of any in- last two decent assault upon any female, or of any attempt to have carnal knowledge of any girl under twelve years of age shall be liable, at the dis- cretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. AMnetion gg. Where any woman of any age shall have against her any interest, whether legal or equitable, present motives'of °''^ future, absolute, conditional, or contingent, in lucre. any real or personal estate, or shall be a presump- tive heiress or coheiress, or presumptive next of kin, or one of the presxmiptive next of kin, to any one having such interest whosoever shall, from motives of lucre, take away or detain such woman girl above the age of ten, and under the age of twelve, unlawfully did make an assault, and her, the said B., did then unlawfully carnally know and abuse, against the form of the statute. Held, that the indictment contained two charges — one of a common assault, and the other of the statutable misdemeanor, and that the prisoner might be convicted of a common assault upon it : (Reg. v. Guthrie, 22 L. T. Eep. 485.) Carnal hrwwledge ietwem. ten and twelve — Attempt* — Upon an indictment for unlawfully assaulting and having carnal knowledge of a girl between ten and twelve years of age, contrary to the statute, &o., the prisoner may be convicted of the attempt to commit that offence: (Beg. v. Rylmd. 18 L. T. Eep. 538.) Girl between ten and twelve — Consent. — An indecent assault on a girl between the ages of ten and twelve, if she is a consenting party, is not an offence punishable at law : [Beg. V. Johnson, 12 L. T. Eep. 603; 34 L. J. M. 0. 192; 10 Cox Crim. Cas. 114.) 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 100. 221 against her will, with intent to marry or carnally know her, or to cause her to be married or carnally known by any other person ; and who- Fraudnlent soever shall fraudulently allure, take away, or a'rfri'JiSde? detain such woman, being under the age of twenty- age against one years, out of the possession and against the he? Sher, will of her father or mother, or of any other *"• person having the lawful care or charge of her, with intent to marry or carnally know her, or to cause her to be married or carnally known by any other person, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and whosoever shall be convicted of oitender any offence against this section shall be incapable taking any of taking any estate or interest, legal or equitable, "J^pl^ in any real or personal property of such woman, or in which she shall have any such interest, or which shall come to her as such heiress, coheiress, or next of kin as aforesaid ; and if any such marriage as aforesaid shall have taken place, such property shall, upon such conviction, be settled in such manner as the Court of Chancery in England or Ireland shall upon any information at the suit of the Attorney-General appoint. 54. Whosoever shall, by force, take away or Forcible detain against her wiU any woman, of any age, aDy"womau with intent to marry or carnally know her, or to with intent cause her to be married or carnally known by any "^ "^ other person, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 222 fences against the Person Act, Abduotionof 55. ('^) Whosoever shall unlawfully take or cause s^ixteen""**"^ to be taken any unmarried girl, being under tlie yearaof age. age of sixteen years, out of the possession and against the will of her father or mother, or of any other person having the lawful care or charge of her, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the dis- ('^. What not a tajdng ml of the fathei's possession. — The prisoner met a girl under sixteen years of age in a street, and induced her to go with him to a place at some distance, where he seduced her, and detained her for some hours. He then took her back to where he met her, and she returned to her father. Held, in the absence of any evidence that the pri- soner knew, pr had reason for knowing, or that he believed that the gM was under the care of her father at the time, that a conviction under sect. 55 could not be sustained: (Beg. V. Eiblert, 19 L. T. Bep. 799 ; Law Eep. 1 0. 0. Bes. 1840 TaMng out of possession of father or mother — Stepfather. — A girl between the ages of sixteen and twenty-one years, entitled to a present interest in landed property, was sent to school by her surviving parent, her mother, who had married again. On returning from school for her Christmas holi- days, the girl wished to remain at her mother's and step- father's, but her mother insisted on the girl abiding by an agreement she had made previously, that when she came back at Christmas she should reside at her grandmother's, who lived in the same town as her mother. The mother, in consequence,, refused to allow the girl to stay with her. The girl on this, instead of going to her grandmother's, went to the house of H. B. B., an uncle, and remained with him thence until the 19th of the following January, visiting her mother daily. The latter, when she discovered where her daughter was residing, desired her to come back to her house, but the girl did not go back. On the 19th of January above mentioned, F. B., another uncle of the girl, allured her and took her away with intent to marry her, aided by H. H. B. ; and, in fact, V. B. actually married her. F. B. was indicted for fraudulently alluring, taking away, and detaining the girl out of the possession of her mother, with intent to marry her, and H. B. B, was indicted for aiding P. B. in the felony. It was alleged on the part of the prose- cution, but denied by the prisoners, that on these facts there was sufScient evidence that F. B. fraudulently allured and took and detained the girl, and that he took her out of the possession of her mother. Held, by a majority of the judges, that the circumstances proved were not in point of fact sufficient to establish that the accused had committed the crime charged in the indictment: (Rm. v. BurreU, 33 L. J. M. 0. 54 i 9 L. T. Bep. 426.) 24 4- 25 Viet cap. 100. 223 oretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. Child-stealing. 56. Whosoever shall unlawfully, either by ohiia- force or fraud, lead or take away, or decoy or stealing, entice away or detain, any child under the age of fourteen years, with intent to deprive any parent, guardian, or other person having the lawful care or charge of such child of the possession of such child, or with intent to steal any article upon or about the person of such child, to whomsoever such article may belong, and whosoever shall, with any such intent, receive or harbour any such child, knowing the same to have been, by force or fraud, led, taken, decoyed, enticed away, or detained as in this section before mentioned, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping : provided that no person who shall have claimed any right to the possession of such child, or shall be the mother or shall have claimed to be the father of an illegitimate child, shaU be liable to be prosecuted by virtue hereof on account of the getting possession of such child or taking such child out of the possession of any person having the lawful charge thereof. Bigamy. 57.('') Whosoever, being married, shall marry Bigamy any other person during the life of the former . (") Onus of proof of first imfe or husband being alive at the time of the second marriage. — On a prosecution for bigamy it is incumbent on the prosecutor to prove that the husband 224 fences against the Person Act, Offence may lie dealt vritli where offender shall be apprehended Not to extend to second marriages, &c., herein stated. husband or wife, whether the second marriage shall have taken place in England or Ireland or elsewhere, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof sh'all be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour ; and any such offence may be dealt with, inquired of, tried, determined, and punished in any county or place in England or Ireland where the offender shall be apprehended or be in custody, in the same manner in all respects as if the offence had been actually committed in that county or place : provided that nothing in this section contained shall extend to any second mar- riage contracted elsewhere than in England and Ireland by any other than a subject of Her Majesty, or to any person marrying a second time whose husband or wife shall have been continually absent from such person for the space of seven years then last past, and shall not have been known by such person to be living within that time, or shall extend to any person who, at the time of such second marriage, shall have been or wife, as the case may be, was alive at the date of the second marriage. The existence of the party at an antece- dent period may or may not afford a reasonable inference that he or she tvas alive at the date of the second marriage ; but it is purely a question of fact for the jury : (Reg. v. Lumlm, 20 L. T. Eep. 454 ; 38 L. J. M. C. 86.) Knowledge ofthejirst wife heing alive— Dii'ecticms to the jury. — In 1863 the prisoner married Mary Ann Bichards, and lived with her about a week, and then left her. It was not proved that he had since seen her. In 1867 he married Blizabeth Evans, his first wife being then alive. On the trial of an indictment for bigamy, the learned judge told the jury that they must be satisfied that the prisoner knew that his first wife was alive at the time of the second marriage. Held, that the direction of the judge to the jury was right, and that it was not necessary to prove affirmatively that at the time of the second marriage the prisoner knew that his first wife was alive : (flej. v. Jones, 21 L. T. Rep. 396.) 24 4- 25 Vict. cap. 100. 225 divorced from tlie bond of the first marriage, or to any person whose former marriage shall have been declared void by the sentence of any court of competent jurisdiction. Attempts to procure Abortion. 58. Every woman, being with child, who, with AdminiBter- intent to procure her own miscarriage, shaU un- i"fng™^^! lawfjiUy administer to herself any poison or other ments to noxious thing, or shall unlawfully use any instru- SbSon. ment or other means whatsoever with the like intent, and whosoever, with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman, whether she be or be not with child, shall unlawfully administer to her or cause to be taken by her any poison or other noxious thing, or shall unlawfully use any instru- ment or other means whatsoever with the like intent, shall be guilty of felony, and being con- victed thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 59.(^^) Whosoever shall unlawfully supply or Procuring procure any poison or other noxious thing, or any ^^f^' ° ' (") Noxious thing— Supplying — Intenl. — Under sect. S9 of the 24 & 2li Vict. c. 100, the thing supplied with intent to procure the miscarriage of a woman with child, must be noxious in its nature. Therefore, where the thing supplied and taken was of a harmless character, but owing to the imagination of the woman being powerfully acted upon, a miscarriage ensued, it was held that.a conviction could not be sustained: (iJ. v. Isaacs, 7 L. T. Kep. 365; 32 L. J. M. 0. 52.) Abmiion— Attempt to procure — Supplt/ing drug. — The de- ceased woman became pregnant by the prisoner and died from the effects of corrosive sublimate, taken by her for the purpose of procuring abortion. The prisoner knowingly procured it for the deceased at her instigation, and under the influence of threats of self-destruction if the means of pro- curing abortion were not supplied to her. The jury nega- l3 22(5 Offences against the Person Act,. instrument or thing whatsoever, knowing that the same is intended to be unlawfully used or employed with intent to procure the miscar- riage of any woman, whether she be or be not with child, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servi- tude for the term of three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. Concealing the Birth of a Child. Concealing 60.('*) If any woman shall be delivered of achild, a child. " every person who shall, by any secret disposition of the dead body of the said child, whether such child died before, at, or after its birth, endeavour to conceal the birth thereof, shall be guilty of a tived \^Q fact of the prisoner having administered it, or caused it to be taken by her. Held, that the prisoner was not guilty of murder as an accessory before the fact : (ifeo. v. Tretwett,6 L. T. Eep. 333; 31 L. J. M. C. 146.) /Supplying noxious di-ug. — A person supplying a noxious drug to a woman with the intent that the woman should take it for the purpose of procuring a miscarriage, is guilty of a misdemeanor under this section, although the woman herself did not intend to take it: (Reg. y. Hillman, 9 Cox Crim. Caa. 386; Leigh and Cave, 343.) (") Concealing a live child. — A woman delivered of a child born alive, endeavoured to conceal the birth thereof by depositing the child while alive in a comer of a field, leaving the infant to die from exposure, which it did, and the dead body was afterwards found in the corner. Held, that she could not be convicted of concealing the birth of the child under sect. 60, which relates to the secret disposition of the dead body of a child: (Reg. v. May, 16 L. T. Eep. 362.) What is a concealment. — What is a secret disposition of the dead body of a child within the meaning of sect. 60 is a question for the jury depending on the circumstances of the particular case. Where the dead body of a child was thrown into a field over a wall four and a-half feet high, separating the yard of a public-house from the field, and a person look- ing over the wall from the yard might have seen the body, but persons going through the yard, or using it in the ordi- nary way, would not, it was held that this was evidence from which the jury might infer a secret disposition of the body: (Reg. v. Brown, 22 L. T. Bep. 484.) 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 100. 227 misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be im- prisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour : provided that if any person tried for the murder of any child shall be acquitted thereof, it shall be lawful for the jury by whose verdict such person shall be ac- quitted to find, in case it shall so appear in evidence, that the child had recently been born, and that such person did, by some secret disposi- tion of the dead body of such child, endeavour to conceal the birth thereof, and thereupon the court may pass such sentence as if such person had been convicted upon an indictment for the concealment of the birth. Unnatural Offences. 61. Whosoever shall be convicted of the sodomy ana abominable crime of buggery, committed either ii89''*'''y. , with mankind or with any animal, shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than ten years. 62. Whosoever shall attempt to commit the Attempt to said abominable crime, or shall be guilty of any °n™moaB° assault with intent to commit the same, or of any crime, indecent assault upon any male person, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for any term not exceeding ten years and not less than three years, — or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 63. Whenever, upon the trial for any offence oamal punishable under this act, it may be necessary to a^^Jd^* prove carnal knowledge, it shall not be necessary to prove the actual emission of seed in order to constitute a carnal knowledge, but the carnal 228 Offences against the Person Act, knowledge shall be deemed complete upon proof of penetration only. Making Gunpowder to commit Offences, and searching for the same. Making or 64. Whosoever stall knowingly have in his gunMwder possession, or make or manufacture, any gun- fte., with ' powder, explosive substance, or any dangerous or intent to ^ . , , .^ •■ . ■ ■ i. commit any noxious thmg, Or any macnme, engine, mstniment, '^'"py , . or thing, with intent by means thereof to commit, act. or for the purpose of enabling any other person to commit, any of the felonies in this act mentioned, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being con- victed thereof, shall be liable at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not ex- ceeding two years, with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement, and, if a male under the age of sixteen years, with or without whipping. JnsHoesmay 65. Any justice of the peace of any county or warrants for place in which any such gunpowder, or other eearehing explosive, dangerous, or noxious substance, or nouseB, &c., ., t ii- . . in whioii thing, or any such macmne, engine, mstrument, BuStmMB °'' *1™& is suspected to be made, kept, or carried are bus- for the purpose of being used in committing any made for the °^ ^he felonies in this act mentioned, upon reason- oor^ttto *^^® cause assigned upon oath by any person, felonies may issue a warrant under his hand and seal against this f^^ searching, ia the daytime, any house, mill, magazine, storehouse, warehouse, shop, cellar, yard, wharf, or other place, or any carriage, waggon, cart, ship, boat or vessel, in which the same is suspected to be made, kept, or carried for such purpose as hereinbefore mentioned ; and every person acting in the execution of any such warrant shall have, for seizing, removing to proper places, and detaining all such gunpowder, explo- sive, dangerous, or noxious substances, machines, engines, instruments, or things found upon such 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 100. 229 search, wliioli lie shall have good cause to suspect to be intended to be used in, committing any such offence, and the barrels, packages, cases, and other receptacles in which the same shall be, the same powers and protections which are given to persons searching for unlawful quantities of gun- powder under the warrant of a justice by the act passed in the session holden in the twenty-third and twenty-fourth years of the reign of Her present Majesty, chapter one hundred and thirty- nine, intituled " An Act to amend the Law con- as ft 24 vict. cerning the making, keeping, and carriage of "-i'^- Gunpowder and Compositions of an explosive nature, and concerning the Manufacture, Sale, and Use of Fireworks." Other Matters. 66. Any constable or peace oflScer may take a peraon into custody, without a warrant, any person whom JSght" nd' he shall find lying or loitering in any highway, Buspeotea of yard, or other place during the night, and whom againsttt^a he shall have good cause to suspect of having ^°'' ™*y ^^ committed or being about to commit any felony bended. in this act mentioned, and shall take such person as soon as reasonably may be before a justice of the peace, to be dealt with according to law. 67. In the case of every felony punishable Punishment under this act, every principal in the second ?^,^gg°*„^ degree, and every accessory before the fact, shall degree, and be punishable m the same manner as the principal in the first degree is by this act punishable ; and every accessory after the fact to any felony punish- able under this act (except murder) shall be liable to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour; and every accessory after the fact to murder shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for life or for any term not less than three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not accesBones. 230 Offences against the Person Act, exceeding two years, with or without hard labour ; and whosoever shall counsel, aid, or abet the commission of any indictable misdemeanor punish- able under this act shall be liable to be proceeded against, indicted, and punished as a principal offender. OHenoeB 68. All indictable offences mentioned in this ^^™Ae act which shall be committed within the juris- ^t'the'"''™ diction of the Admiralty of England or Ireland Admiralty, shall be deemed to be offences of the same nature and liable to the same punishments as if they had been committed upon the land in England or Ireland, and may be dealt with, inquired of, tried, and determined in any county or place in England or Ireland in which the offender shall be apprehended or be in custody, in the same manner in all respects as if they had been actually com- mitted in that county or place ; and in any in- dictment for any such offence, or for being an accessory to such an offence, the venue in the margin shall be the sam.e as if the offence had been committed in any such county or place, and the offence shall be averred to have been com- mitted " on the High Seas :" provided that nothing herein contained shall alter or affect any of the laws relating to the government of Her Majesty's land or naval forces. Hardiabonr 69. Whenever imprisonment, with or without in gaol or Jiari labour, may be awarded for any indictable oon-eoiioD. offence under this act, the court may sentence the offender to be imprisoned, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard labour, in the common gaol or house of correction. Solitary 70. Whenever solitary confinement may be oonflnement awarded for any offence under this act, the court whipping, may direct the offender to be kept in solitary confinement for any portion or portions of any 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 100. 231 imprisonment, or of any imprisonment with hard labour, which the court may award, not exceeding one month at any one time, and not exceeding three months in any one year ; and whenever whipping may be awarded for any offence under this act, the court may sentence the offender to be once privately whipped ; and the number of strokes, and the instrument with which they shall be inflicted, shall be specified by the court in the sentence. 71.('®) Whenever any person shall be con- Pine, and victed of any indictable misdemeanor punishable I'jSg the under this act, the court may, if it shall think fit, peace; in in addition to or in lieu of any punishment by ^''°'* ''^"°^' this act authorised, fine the offender, and require him to enter into his own recognisances, and to find sureties, both or either, for keeping the peace and being of good behaviour ; and in case of any felony punishable under this act otherwise than with death the court may, if it shall think fit, require the offender to enter into his own recognisances, and to find sureties, both or either, for keeping the peace, in addition to any punish- ment by this act authorised : provided that no person shall be imprisoned for not finding sureties under this clause for any period exceeding one year. 72. No summary conviction under this act no cer- tiorari, &c (i«) The power given by this section to the court to impose a fine in lien of anv other punishment in all cases of misde^ meanor under the act, is certainly a most extensive one, and in effect amounts to a bestowal of unlimited powers of miti- gation of punishment, and when we find that unlawfully and maliciously wounding, maliciously administering poison with intent to injure, abandoning a child so that its life shall be endangered, assaulting with intent to commit a felony, carnally knowing agirl between ten and twelve years of age, attempting to commit an unnatural crime, are all misde- meanors under the statute, the powers thus given to impose a fine in lieu of any other punishment looks very like jesting with criminal punishmentB. 232 Offences against the Person Act, shall be quashed for want of form, or be removed by certiorari to any of Her Majesty's superio courts of record ; and no warrant of commitment shall be held void t)y reason of any defect therein, provided it be therein alleged that the party has been convicted, and there be a good and valid conviction to sustain the same. Qnardiana 73. Where any complaint shall be made of any seerB°mttyije offence against section twenty-six of this act, or required to of any bodily injury inflicted upon any person certain oases under the age of sixteen years, for which the a' atast'tMs P^^J Committing it is liable to be indicted, and act the circumstances of which offence amount in point of law to a felony, or an attempt to commit a felony, or an assault with intent to commit a felony, and two justices of the peace before whom such complaint is heard shall certify under their hands that it is necessary for the purposes of public justice that the prosecution should be conducted by the guardians of the union or place, or, where there are no guardians, by the overseers of the poor of the place, in which the offence shall be charged to have been committed, such guardians or overseers, as the case may be, upon Costs of personal service of such certificate or a duplicate proseoutiou. thereof upon the clerk of such guardians or upon any one of such overseers, shall conduct the prosecution, and shall pay the costs reasonably and properly incurred by them therein (so far as the same shall not be allowed to them under any order of any court) out of the common fund of the union, or out of the funds in the hands of the guardians or overseers, as the case may be ; and, where there is a board of guardians, the Clerk of clerk or some other officer of the union or place, may be and, where there is no board of guardians, one of top™eciite. ^^^ overseers of the poor, may, if such justices think it necessary for the purposes of public justice, be bound over to prosecute. 24 ^ 25 Vict, cap. 100. 233 74. Where any person shall be convicted on On a any indictment of any assault, whether with or fo°l8sau°t without battery and wounding, or either of them, tiie oourt such person may, if the court think fit, in addi- payment tion to any sentence which the court may deem p5^3gg;ito,.a proper for the offence, be adjudged to pay to costs by the the prosecutor his actual and necessary cost and * ™ °'° expenses of the prosecution, and such moderate allowance for the loss of time as the court shall by affidavit or other inquiry and examination ascertain to be reasonable ; and, unless the sum so awarded shall be sooner paid, the offender shall be imprisoned for any term the court shall award, not exceeding three months, in addition to the term of imprisonment (if any) to which the offender may be sentenced for the offence. 75. The court may, by warrant under hand Such coats and seal, order such sum as shall be so awarded levied by to be levied by distress and sale of the goods and '^^^s''- chattels of the offender, and paid to the prose- cutor, and that the surplus, if any, arising from such sale, shall be paid to the owner ; and in case such sum shall be so levied the imprisonment awarded untU payment of such sum shall there- upon cease. 76. Every offence hereby made punishable on Summaiy summary conviction may be prosecuted in England in England in the manner directed by the act of the session ^^/gj'^g holden in the eleventh and twelfth years of ii & 12 Vict Queen Victoria, chapter forty-three, and may be Ji'ir'ei^a prosecuted in Ireland before two or more justices ^^f^*^. , of the peace, or one metropolitan or stipendiary 0. as. magistrate, in the manner directed by the act of the session holden in the fourteenth and fifteenth years of Queen Victoria, chapter ninety-three, or in such other manner as may be directed by any act that may be passed for like purposes ; and all provisions contained in the said acts shall be applicable to such prosecutions in the same 234. Offences against the Person Act. manner as if they were incorporated in this act ; provided that nothing in this act contained shall in any manner alter or affect any enactment now in force relating to procedure in the case of any offence punishable on summary conviction within the City of London or the Metropolitan Police District or the recovery or application of any penalty or forfeiture for any such offence. 77. The court before which any misdemeanor indictable under the provisions of this act shall be prosecuted or tried may allow the costs of the pro- secution in the same manner as in cases of felony ; and every order for the pajrment of such costs shall be made out, and the sum of money men- tioned therein paid and repaid, upon the same terms and in the same manner in all respects as in cases of felony. Act not to 78. Nothing in this act contained shall extend loo™ana! ^° Scotland, except as hereinbefore otherwise expressly provided. Commence- 79. This act shall commence and take effect on mentofacti the first day of November one thousand eight hundred and sixty-one. Except In London and the metro- politan police dis- trict. The costs of tbe prosecution of miade- meanors against this act may be allowed 235 Statutes aitir ^arts of Statutes RELATING TO THE CRIMINAL LAW, OTHBK THAN THE CBIMINAL LAW CONSOLIDATION ACTS. ADMIEALTY COTJET JUEISDICTION ACT. (24 ViOT. OAP. 10.) An Act to extend the Jurisdiction and improve the Practice of the High Court of Admiralty. — \l7th May, 1861.] Faleeoathof Sect. 26. The Eegistrar of the said Court of deemed Admiralty shaU have power to administer oaths P^''J"'7- in relation to any cause or matter depending in the said court ; and any person who shall wilfully depose or affirm falsely in any proceeding before the registrar or before any deputy or assistant registrar of the said court, or before any person authorised to administer oaths in the said court, shall be deemed to be guilty of perjury, and shall be liable to aU the paias and penalties attaching to wilful and corrupt perjury. 236 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 66, PersoDB refusing from con- BcientiouB motiveB to be sworn in criminal proceedings to be permitted to solemn affirmation or decla- ration. CRIMINAL PEOOEEDINGS OATH BELIEF ACT. (24 & 25 ViOT. CAP. 66.) An Act to give Relief to Persons who may refuse or be unwilling, from alleged conscientious Motives, to be sworn in Criminal Proceedings. [1st August, 1861.] Whebeas it is expedient to grant relief to persons ■wto may refuse or be unwilling, from alleged conscientious motives, to be sworn in criminal proceedings : be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice /and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parlia- ment assembled, and by the authority of the same as foUows : l.C) If any person called as a witness in any court of criminal jurisdiction in England or Ireland, or required or desiring to make an affidavit or deposition in the course of any criminal proceeding, shall refuse or be unwilling, from alleged conscientious motives, to be sworn, it shall be lawful for the court or judge, or other presiding officer or person qualified to take affi- davits or depositions, upon being satisfied of the sincerity of such objection, to permit such person, instead of being sworn, to make his or her solemn affirmation or declaration, in the words following : videlicit, " I A.B., do solemnly, sincerely, and truly affirm and declare, that the taking of any oath is according to my religious beUef unlawful ; and I do also solemnly, sincerely, and truly affirm and declare," &c. (') See, also, 23 & 24 Vict. o. 68, s. 4. 24 ^ 25 Vict. cap. 110. 237 Which solemn afiSrmation and declaration shall be of the same force and effect as if such person had taken an oath in the usual form. 2. If any person making such solemn afiSrma- PimiBiiment tion or declaration shall wilfully, falsely, and (aL™* ""^ corruptly afBrm or declare any matter or thing afarmation. which, if the same had been sworn in the usual form, would have amounted to wilful and corrupt perjury, every such person so offending shall incur the same penalties as by the laws and statutes of this kingdom are or may be enacted or provided against persons convicted of wilful and oprrupt perjury. 3. This act shall come into operation on the Commence- first day of October in the year one thousand eight hundred and sixty-one. DEALERS IN OLD METALS ACT. (24 & 25 ViOT. CAP. 110.) An Act Jor regulating the Business of Dealers in old Metals. — [6th August, 1861.] Sect. 3.0) In the construction and for the pur- Definition poses of this act the term "dealer in old metals " ° ''™'' shall mean any person dealing in, buying, and selling old metal, scrap metal, broken metal, or partly manufactured metal goods, or defaced or old metal goods, and whether such person deals in such articles only, or together with second-hand goods or marine stores, and the term " old metals" shall mean the said articles. 4. It shall be lawful for any justice of the Penalty on dealer in (1) See, also, 32 & 33 Vict. u. 99, s. 17. 238 Deahrs in Old Metals Act, old metals beiDg in possession of stolen property. peace, upon complaint made before him, upon oath, that the. complainant has reason to believe and does believe that any old metal stolen or unlawfully obtained is kept in any house, shop, room, or place by any dealer in old metals within the limits of the jurisdiction of su6Ja. justice, to give authority, by special warrant, to any constable or police officer to enter, in the daytime, such house, shop, room, or other place, with such assistance as may be necessary, and to search for and seize all such old metals there found, and to carry all the articles so seized before the justice issuing the said warrant, or some other justice exercising similar jurisdiction, and such justice shall thereupon issue a summons requiring such dealer to appear before two justices, at a time and place to be named in such summons, and if such dealer shall not then and there prove to the satisfaction of such justices how he came by the said articles, or if any such dealer shall be found, in possession of any old metal which has been stolen or unlawfully obtained, and on his being taken or summoned before two justices it shall be proved to the satis- faction of such justices that at the time when he received it he had reasonable cause to believe it to have been stolen or unlawfully obtained, then in either of such cases such dealer shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding five pounds, and for any subsequent offence .to a penalty not exceeding twenty pounds, or at the discretion of the justices in the case of such second or subsequent offence shall be imprisoned and kept to hard labour for any period not exceeding three calendar months : provided always, that nothing herein contained shall interfere with or affect any proceeding by indictment to which such dealer in old metals may be liable for feloniously and knowingly receiving stolen goods, but no person shall be prosecuted by indictment and proceeded against under this act for the same offence. 24 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 110. 239 5. When any dealer in old metals is convicted Jusaoeemay of either of the. offences aforesaid, it shall be to be lawful for such justices, or, on proof of such con- registered, viotion, for any other two justices of the same petty sessional district of a county, or city or borough, on proof of such' conviction, to order and direct that such dealer shall be registered at the principal police office of such district or city or borough in a book to be kept by the chief ofBcer of police for the purpose, according to the form No. 1 in the schedule to this act annexed, and from and after such registration such dealer shall be subject to and shall conform to the several regulations hereinafter provided, for such period, not exceeding three years, as such justices shall order ; and if such dealer shall during such period be convicted of any offence under this act, the justices so convicting him may order such period to be extended for not more than three years from the time when such period would otherwise expire ; and in like manner, whilst such dealer is subject to the regulations of this act, on any further conviction under this act, and as often as such further conviction shall take place, the justices so convicting him may order the period for which he is then subject to such regulations to be extended for not more than three years from the time when such period would otherwise expire : provided always, that where any dealer in old metals who is also a dealer in marine stores within the meaning of the four hundred and eightieth section of the Mer- chant Shipping Act, 1854, is registered as afore- said, he shall likewise conform to the regulations contained in the said section of the said act, and shall be liable to the penalties in the said section provided for not conforming to such regulations. 240 Discharged Prisoners Aid Act, SCHEDULE. No. I. — REaiSTEB OP Dealers in old Metals. Date of BegiBtration Date of Gonvictiou, Period for which to he subject to BegulatioDS of this Act Name. Place of Abode and BusinesB, DISCHAEGED PEISONEES AH) ACT. (25 & 26 ViOT. CAP. 44.) An Act to amend, the Law relating to the giving of Aid to discharged Prisoners. — \Vlth July, 1862.] Whereas by tlie tMrty-nintli section of an act passed in tlie session holden in the fourth year of King George the Fourth, chapter sixty-four, intituled " An Act for consolidating and amending the Laws. relating to the building, repairing, and regulating of certain Gaols and Houses of Cor- rection in England and Wales," and hereinafter referred to as " The Gaol Act," it is provided that it should be lawful for any one or more of the visiting justices of any prison to which that act extended, from whence any prisoner should be discharged, to direct that such moderate sum of money shoiild be given and paid to any and every such prisoner so discharged who should not have the means of returning to his or her family or place of settlement, or resorting to any place of employinent or honest occupation, as, in the judgment of such justice or justices, should be 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 44. 241 requisite and necessary for such, purpose, under all the circumstances attending the case of any sucli prisoner; and that such, sum of money should be paid by the keeper of such prison, to or for the use of such prisoner for the purpose aforesaid, and that all such sums should be pro- vided for, either out of such bequests or bene- factions as therein mentioned, or in such manner as is by the Gaol Act directed with respect to the expense of the support and maintenance of the prisoners in the prisons to which such act extends : And whereas divers societies, herein- after referred to as " Discharged Prisoners Aid Societies," have been formed in divers parts of England, by persons subscribing voluntarily, for the purpose of finding employment for discharged prisoners, and enabling them by loans and grants of money to live by honest labour : And whereas it is expedient that power should be given to the visiting justices of prisons to give aid under the said act to discharged prisoners through the medium of a Discharged Prisoners Aid Society, in cases where such society has been previously certified by the justices having jurisdiction over such gaol or house of correction, at some court of general or quarter sessions, or at some quarterly sessions held by them, to be a society approved of by them : Be it enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : Sect. 1. The justices having jurisdiction over Power to any gaol or house of correction to which the grant oerti- Gaol Act extends may, at any court of general or p^Jl^igt^P" quarter sessions, or at any quarterly sessions, upon prisoners' A T j_- n .™.i,„... „-, aid societies; the application of any one or more member or members of a Prisoners Aid Society, and after examining the rules of such society, and receiving 242 Discharged Prisoners Aid Act. such evidence as they think fit as to the condition of such society, issue a certificate under the hand of their chairman to the effect that such society is approved of by them for the purposes of this and to re- act ; and they may, at any future court of general suBDendthe °^ quarter sessions, or at any future quarterly same. sessions, upon due cause shown, by a writiag under the hand of their chairman, revoke or sus- pend such certificate ; and any society in respect of which such certificates as aforesaid has been granted and remains in force shall be deemed to be a " Certified Prisoners Aid Society," and to be entitled to such privileges as are hereinafter men- tioned. Relief may 2. Where a prisoner is discharged from any be afforded prison to which the said Gaol Act extends, the prisoners' visiting justices of such prison, instead of directing aid society." ^j^g^^ g^^jj moderate sum of money shall be paid by the keeper of such prison to or for the use of such prisoner for the purpose aforesaid, may if they shall think fit direct that such sum, not ex- ceeding in any case two pounds, shall be paid to the treasurer of a certified Prisoners Aid Society on their receiving from such society an undertaking in writing, signed by the secretary thereof, that the same shall be applied for the benefit of such prisoner : provided that if it shall not be possible for the society so to apply such sum for the benefit of such prisoner, the same or so much thereof as shall not have been so applied shall be applied by such society for the benefit of such other prisoner or prisoners discharged from the said gaol as the said visiting justices shall direct. Funds out 3. AU sums paid to a certified Prisoners Aid repayments Society under this act shall be provided for out of provided, the same funds and in the same .manner as is by the said Gaol Act directed vdth respect to the ■* sums therein authorised to be given or paid as herein-before recited to discharged prisoners. 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 53. 243 TEANSFEE OF LAJSTD ACT. (25 & 26 ViOT. OAP. 53.) An Act to facilitate the Proof of Title to, and the Conveyance of, Real Estates. — [29''er, jurisdiction, and authority as to all diction. matters and things whatsoever as if the offence charged in the said indictment had actu.ally been committed within the jurisdiction of the said court : and every such offence may be dealt with, tried, and determined by and before such justices, judges, or commissioners, or any two or more of them in the same manner in all respects as if the same had actually been committed within the jurisdiction of the said court : provided that nothing in this section contained shall limit or lessen any power, jurisdiction, or authority con- ferred upon the said justices, judges, or com- missioners, or any two or more of them!, by this act; Sects. 21, 27, 16. The provisions of the twenty-first section v^ot^o iV of the said act made and passed in the nine- extended to teenth year of Her Majesty Queen Victoria shall apply to every prisoner removed to any gaol under the provisions of this act, in the same manner in all respects and for all intents and purposes as if such prisoner had been so removed as in any of the preceding sections of the said act is mentioned, and as if that section had been re-enacted herein with reference to prisoners removed to any gaol under the provisions of this act ; and where any person shall have been removed to any gaol under the provisions of this act, the provisions of the 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 65. 271 twenty-seventh, and' twenty-eighth sections of ' the same act shall apply in the same manner in all respects as in the case where any person shall have been removed or committed to the said gaol of Newgate under the provisions of the said act. 17. Whenever any prosecutor and witnesses Prosecutor in any case where any indictment shall have been *"'* """ r J 1 1 . . I. 1 . neaaes may lound under the provisions of . this act shall bo bound appear before the court at or before which such zL^Tfo"" indictment shall be found, tried, or proceeded app?ar upon, it shall be lawful for such court, from time the^aia °'" to time and as often as to the same court shall °™'''^ seem fit, to require such prosecutor and' witnesses to enter into such recognisance in such sum of money, and with such condition as to appearance at the said court, and otherwise, as to the said court shall seem fit. 18. It shall be lawful for Her Majesty, by Her Majesty and with the advice of Her most honourable privy ™ """lou council, from time to time to make rules and rules for regulations touching the said gaol of Newgate, or S'S^ "' any other gaol or prison, and the government and keeping thereof ; and it shall be lawful for the Lord Lieutenant or other chief governor or governors of Ireland, by and with the advice of the privy council, from time to time to make rules and regulations touching the said Eichmond Bridewell for the purposes of this act, and touch- ing the alteration of any commission, writs, precepts, or other proceedings whatsoever for carrying into effect the purposes of this act ; and all such rules and regulations shall be of the Hke force and effect as if the same had been made by authority of Parliament, and shall be notified in the London or Dublin Gazette, or in such other manner as Her Majesty, by and with the advice of Her most honourable privy council, shall think fit to direct. 272 Jurisdiction in Homicides Act, Act not, to 19. Nothing in this act contained shall render affect any ^^^ person claiming the privilege of peerage triable under the pronsions of this act. interpreta- 20. In the construction of this act the words tomf "present Mutiny Act" shall be understood to^ mean the act made and passed in this present Parliament, intituled " An Act ' for punishing Mutiny and Desertion, and for the better Pay- ment of the Army and their Quarters;" and the ■words " future Mutiny Act" shall be understood to mean any act hereafter to be made and passed for the purposes and with the intents and objects of the present Mutiny Act, or for the like purposes, and with the like intents and objects. Short title. 21. In citing this act in any instrument, docu- ment, or proceeding it shall be sufficient to use the expression "The Jurisdiction in Homicides Act, 1862." SCHEDULE referred to in the foregoing Act. 1. Fm^m of C&rtijhate mentioTied in the First Section. I, the undersigned, Her Majesty's principal Secretary of State for the War Department, having been credibly in- formed that [name or names of prisoner oi* prisoners'] lately committed for the murder \or manslaughter] of [name of per' son Idlled] deceased, and now confined id the gaol [house of correction] at , in the county of , is a person fare persons] subject to the Mutiny Act, and that the said [name of person deceased] deceased was at the time of the alleged murder [or manslaughter] also subject to the said act, and that the said murder or supposed murder [or man- slaughter or supposed manslaughter] was committed in England or Wales, and oat of the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court [or in Ireland and elsewhere than in the county of the dty of Dwlin, in the county of Dublin,] and having been creciibly informed of the circumstances relating to the said alleged crime, and deeming it expedient that a more speedy trial of the said [name or names of prisoner <»■ jtri- soners] should be had than the usual course of practice allows, do hereby certify my belief that it would contribute to the maintenance of good order and military discipline if 25 ^26 Vict cap. 65. 278 the said [name or names of prisoner or prisoners'] were to be indicted and tried under the provisions of the Jarisdiction in Homicides Act, 1862. Given under my hand this day of , , A.D. [signature oj the said Secretary ofSiate.J 2. Form of Order of the Court of Queen's Bench mentioned in the First Section, In Her Majesty's Court of Queen's Bench. [Name of term.'] Term A. D. [Tear of ow Lord |. Whereas it appears by the affidavit [w affidavits] of [name w names of deponent t>i' deponenUl, that [fiame or flames of prisoner or pi-isone7-s], now in the custody of the gaoler or keeper of the gaol [w house of correction] at , in the county of , was [or were] committed for the murder [or manslaughter] of [name of deceased] deceased, and that as well the said [name or names of pH- soner or pi'isoners] as the said [rtame of deceased] deceased were at the time of the commission or supposed commission of the said murder [or manslaughter] subject to the Mutiny Act : Now thereupon, and on the application and certificate of Her Majesty's principal Secretary of State for the War Department, it is ordered, that the said [name or names of prisoTier or prisonet's'] be indicted and tried under the pro* visions of the Jurisdiction in Homicides Act, 1862. By the Court. 2. Oorm of Order of a Judge mentioned in the First Whereas it appears [follow the last preceding form as far as the wm'ds " Secretary of State for the War Department"] I do order that the said [name or names of prisoner or pri- soners'] be indicted and tried under the provisions of the Jurisdiction in Homicides Act, 1862. Given under my hand in vacation, this day of , A.D. [Year of tmr Lord], [Signature ofjudge.'\ 8. Form of Indorsement mentioned in the Fourth Section. - I certify that [name or names of prisoner or pi'isoners] was ,[o)' were] committed for the murder [or manslaughterl of 'name of deceased] deceased, and that he [or they] has [or iave] been removed to the gaol of Newgate [or the Rich- mond! Bridewell] under the provisions of the Jurisdiction in Homicides Act, 1862. [Signatwre of proper officer of the court.] N 3 274 Declaration of Title Act, DEOLAEATION OF TITLE ACT. (25 & 26 Vict. cap. 67.) An Act for ohtaining a Declaration of Title. — [29iA July, 1862.] - Penalty on Sect. 44. If in the course of any proceeding Mseafate- before the court under this act any person acting ment and either as principal or agent shall, knowingly and suppression •,^ • . , , ^ ■ ^ • j. .•'■ ■ of deeds and With intent to deceive, make or assist or join in evidence, qj. ijjq prjyy to the making of any material false statement or representation, or suppress, conceal, or assist or join in or be privy to the suppressing, withholding, or concealing from the court any material document, fact, or matter of information, every person so acting shall be deemed to be gailty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction shall be liable to be imprisoned for a term not exceed- ing three years, and either with or without hard labour, or to be fined such sum as the court by which he is convicted shall award ; the order or declaration of title obtained by means of such fraud or falsehood shaH be null and void for or against aU persons other than a purchaser for valuable consideration without notice. ii-audufent ^5. If in the course of any proceeding before alterations, t]ie court under this act any person shall fraudu- lently forge or alter or assist in forging or altering any certificate or other document relating to such land or to the title thereof, or shall fraudulently offer, utter, dispose of, or put off any such cer- tificate or other document, knowing the" same to be forged or altered, such person shall be guilty of felony, and upon conviction shall be liable, at the discretion of the court by which h? is con- victed, to be kept in penal servitude for hie or for any term not less than three years, or to be imprisoned for a term not exceeding two years, 25 (?• 26 Vict. cap. 67. 275 with or without hard labour, and with or without solitary confinement. 46. No proceeding or conviction for any act Oonvietion hereby declared to be a misdemeanor shall affect oiTii remedy any remedy which any person aggrieved by such act may be entitled to, either at law or in equity, against the person who has committed such act. 47. Nothing in this act contained shall entitle Enactment any person to refuse to make a complete dis- not to ex- oovery by answer to any biU in equity, or to gaum^to" answer any question or interrogatory in any make dis- civil proceeding, in any court of law or equity, or °°™''y- in the court of bankruptcy ; but no answer to any such bill, question, or interrogatory shall be ad- missible in evidence against such person in any criminal proceeding. 48. In the construction of this act (except Conatrac- where the context or other provisions of the act terms, &c. in require a different construction) the word "per- 'i"s'«' = son" shall include a body politic or corporate; "Person;" the word " possession " shall include receipt of gio°?f.°^" the rents and profits ; and the word " land " shall "Land, not include any incorporeal hereditaments, but shall include all corporeal tenements and here- ditaments not expressly excepted. 49. This act shall relate to England only, and Extent of shall come into operation on the first day of January one thousand eight hundred and sixty- three, and may be cited as " The Declaration of ^'''"'t title Title Act, 1862." 276 Merchandise Marks Act, MERCHANDISE MARKS ACT. (25 & 26 Vict. cap. 88.) An Act to amend the Law relating to the Frau- dulent Marking of Merchandise. — \lth August, 1862.] Whereas it is expedient to amend the laws relating to the fraudulent markiDg of merchan- dise, and to the sale of merchandise falsely marked for the purpose of fraud : Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the autho- rity of the same, as follows : CoBBtrao- Sect. 1. In the construction of this act the tion o( word "person " shall include any person, whether a subject of Her Majesty or not, and any body corporate or body of the like nature, whether constituted according to the law of this country or of any of Her Majesty's colonies or dominions, or according to the law of any foreign country, and also any company, association, or society of persons, whether the members thereof be subjects of Her Majesty or not, or some of such persons subjects of Her Majesty and some of them not, and whether such body corporate, body of the like na-ture, company, association, or society be established or carry on business within Her Majesty's dominions or elsewhere, or partly within Her Majesty's dominions and partly elsewhere; the word "mark" shall include any name, sig- nature, word, letter, device; emblem, figure, sign, seal, stamp, diagram, label, ticket, or other mark of any other description ; and the expression "trade mark" shall include any and every such name, signature, word, letter, device, emblemj 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 88. 277 figure, sign, seal, stamp, diagram, label, ticket, or other mark as aforesaid lawfully used by any person to denote any chattel, or (in Scotland) any article of trade, manufacture, or merchandise, to be an article or thing of the manufacture, -work- manship, production, or merchandise of such person, or to be an article or thing of any peculiar or particular description made or sold by such person, and shall also include any name, signature, word, letter, number, figure, mark, or sign which in pursuance of any statute or statutes for the time being in force relating to registered designs is to be put or placed upon or attached to any chattel or article during the existence or con- tinuance of any copyright or other sole right acquired under the provisions of such statutes or any of them ; the word " misdemeanor " shall include crime and offence in Scotland ; and the word " court " shall include any sheriff or sheriff substitute in Scotland. 2. Every person who, with intent to defraud, Forging a or to enable another to defraud any person, shall or^faiseiy'' forge or counterfeit, or cause or procure to be applying forged or counterfeited, any trade mark, or shall mw-ij'with apply, or cause or procure to be applied, any ™^°' *" trademark or any forged or counterfeited trade misde- ' mark to any chattel or article not being the ' manufacture, , workmanship, production, ot mer- chandise of any person . denoted or intended to be denoted by such trade mark, or denoted or intended to be denoted by such forged or counter- feited trade mark, or not being the manufacture, workmanship, production, or merchandise of any person whose trade mark shall be so forged or counterfeited, or shall -apply or cause or procure to be applied, any trade mark or any forged or counterfeited trade mark to any chattel or article, not being the particular or peculiar description of manufacture, workmanship, production, or mer- , meanor. 278 Merchandise Marks Act, chandise denoted or intended to be denoted by sucb trade mark or by such, forged or counter- feited trade^ mark, stall be guilty of a misde- meanor, and every person so committing a mis- demeanor stall also forfeit to Her Majesty every obattel and article belonging to suoli person to wHch lie sbaU have so unlawfully applied, or caused or procured to be applied, any sucb trade mark or forged or counterfeited trade mark as aforesaid, and every instrument in the possession or power of sucL. person, and by means of which any such trade mark, or forged or counterfeited trade mark as aforesaid, shall have been so ap- plied, and every instrument in the possession or power of such person for applying any such trade mark or forged or counterfeited trade mark as aforesaid, shall be forfeited to Her Majesty ; and the court before which any such misdemeanor shall be tried may order such forfeited articles as aforesaid to be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as such court shall think fit. Applying a 3. Every person who, with intent to defraud, mark to any or to enable another to defraud, any person, shall ™app'er°'°^' ^PP-'-y °' cause or procure to be applied any trade 4c., in or mark or any forged or counterfeited trade mark aSy'araoie *° ^'^1 c^^, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, cover, • ;b sold or wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other thing be sold, a in, on, or with which any chattbl or article, shall SS^,. be intended to be sold or shall be sold or uttered or exposed for sale, or intended for any purpose of trade or manufacture, or shall enclose or place any chattel or article or cause or procure any chattel or article to be enclosed or placed, in, upon, under, or with any cask, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other thing to which any trade mark shall have been falsely applied, or to which any forged or counterfeited trade mark shall have been applied, or shall apply or attach or cause 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 88. 273 or procure to be applied or attached to any chattel ov article any case, cover, reel, ticket, , label, or other thing to which any trade mark shall have been falsely applied, or to which any forged or counterfeited trade mark shall have been applied, or shall enclose, place, or attach any chattel or article, or cause or procure any chattel or article to be enclosed, placed, or at- tached in, upon, under, with, or to any cask, _ bottle, stopper, vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other thing having thereon any trade mark of any other person, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and every person so committing a misdemeanor shall also forfeit to Her Majesty every such chattel and article, and also every such cask, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other thing as aforesaid in the possession or power of such person; and every other similar cask, bottle,, stopper, vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other thing made to be used in like manner as aforesaid, and every instrument in the possession or power of such person, and by means of which any such trade mark or forged or counterfeited trade mark as aforesaid shall have been applied, 'and also every instrument in the possession or power of such person for applying any such trade mark or forged or counterfeit trade mark as aforesaid, shall be forfeited to Her Majesty ; and the court before which any such misdemeanor shall be tried may order such for- feited articles as aforesaid to be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as such court shall think fit. 4. Every person who, after the thirty-first day SelUng ar- of December one thousand eight hundred and {^113^^'' sixty-three, shall sell, utter, or expose either for false trade sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacture, jiat Decem- or cause or procure to be sold, uttered, or exposed 'l^'^j^^' for sale or other purpose as aforesaid, any chattel equal to 280 Merchandise Marks Act, value of or article, together witli any forged or counter- and a Bum ' felted trade mark, which he shall know to be not exceed- forged Or coimterf eited, or together with the trade mg6(. nor ° ^ ,. i t j! i i lesB than mark or any other person apphed or used ralsely ^'''' or wrongfully or without lawful authority or excuse, knowing such trade mark of another person to have been so applied or used as aforesaid, and that whether any such trade mark or forged or counterfeited trade mark as aforesaid, together with which any such chattel or article, shall be sold, uttered, or exposed for sale or other purpose as aforesaid, shall be in, upon, about, or with such chattel or article, or in, upon, about, or with any cask, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other thing in, upon, about, or with which such chattel or article shall be sold or uttered or exposed for sale or other purpose as aforesaid, shall for every such offence forfeit and pay to Her Majesty a sum of money equal to the value of the chattel or article so sold, uttered, offered, or exposed for sale or other purpose as aforesaid, and a further sum not exceeding five pounds and not less than ten shillings. Additions to 5. Every addition to and every alteration of, «ons*of ™" ^^^ ^^^° every imitation of any trade mark which trademarks shall be made, applied, or used with intent to Stent^ defraud, or to enable any other person to defraud, defraud to gr which shall cause a trade mark with such be deemed - . -u'l' in i . • forgeries, alteration or adaition, or shall cause such imita- tion of a trade mark to resemble any genuine trade mark so or in such manner as to be calcu- lated or likely to deceive, shall be and be deemed to be a false, forged, and counterfeited trade mark within the m.eaning of this act ; and every act of making, applying, or otherwise using any such addition to or alteration of a trade mark or any such imitation of a trade mark, as aforesaid done by any person with intent to defraud, or to 25 ^26 Vict. cap. 88. 281 enable any other person to defraud, shall be and "be deemed to be forging and counterfeiting a ■trade mark witliin the meaning of this act. 6. Where any person who, at any time after Any person -the thirty-first day of December one thousand J^° Deoem- eight hundred and sixty-three, shall have sold, t«r ises, uttered, or exposed for sale or other purpose as gold an ar- aforesaid, or shall have caused or procured to be a°/ai8e°traa^ sold, uttered, or exposed for sale or other purpose mark to bo as aforesaid, any chattel, or article, together with gf^inf'or. any forged or counterfeited trade mark, or to- maflon gether with the trade mark of any other person procured it. used without lawful authority or excuse as afore- said, and that whether any such^ trade mark or such forged or counterfeited trade mark as afore- said, be in, upon, about, or with such chattel or article, or in, upon, about, or with any cask, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other thing in, upon, about, or with which such chattel or article shall have been sold or exposed for sale, such person shall be bound upon demand in writing delivered to him or left for him at his last known dwelling-house or at the place of sale or exposure for sale by or on the behalf of any person whose trade mark shall have been so forged or counterfeited, or used without lawful authority or excuse as aforesaid, to give to the person requiring the same, or his attorney or agent, within forty-eight hours after such demand, fuU information in writing of the name and address of the person from whom he shall have purchased or obtained such chattel or article, and of the time when he obtained the •same ; and it shall be lawful for any justice of the Power to -peaoe, on information on oath of such demand ^enro^oo'" and refusal, to summon before him the party parties re- refusing, and on being satisfied that such demand give uilor- ought to be complied with to order such infor- maMo". Tnation to be given within a certain time to be 282 Merchandise Maries Act, Penalty for appointed by Mm ; and any such, party who shall re usa bi. j.g{j,gg qj. nggleot to comply with such order shall for every such offence forfeit and pay to Her Majesty the sum of five pounds, and such refusal or neglect shall be primd facie evidence that the person so refusing or neglecting had fuU know- ledge that the trade mark, together vdth which such chattel or article was sold, uttered, or ex- posed for sale or other purpose as aforesaid, at the time of such selling, uttering, or exposing was a forged, counterfeited, and false trade mark, or was the trade mark of a person which had been used without lawful authority or excuse, as the case may be. Marking 7. Every person who, with intent to defraud or any false ^g enable another to defraud, shall put or cause indication of r xj. l -i- l quantity, &0. or procure to be put upon any chattel or article, arMoie^ith o"^ ''^po'i ^^^y c^^k, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, intent to de- cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other aity a' sum thing, together with which any chattel or article equal to the gj^aH jje intended to be or shall be sold or uttered value of tne article and or exposed for sale, or for any purpose of trade or 8„^'n'ot ex. manufacture, or upon any case, frame, or other ceedingw thing in or bv means of which any chattel or ftoQ not Isss o •/ */ than io«. article shall be intended to be or shall be exposed for sale, any false description, statement, or other indication of or respecting the number, quantity, measure, or weight of such chattel or article, or any part thereof, or of the place or oountiy in which such chattel or article shall have been made, manufactured, or produced, or shall put or cause or procure to be put upon any such chattel or article, cask, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or thing as afore- said, any word, letter, figure, signature, or mark for the purpose of falsely indicating such chattel or article, or the mode of manufacturing or pro- ducing the same, or the ornamentation, shape, or configuration thereof to be the subject of any 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 88. 28S existing patent, priyilege, or oopja-ight, shall for eyery such offence forfeit and pay to Her Majesty a sum of money equal to the value of the chattel or article so sold or uttered or exposed for sale, and a further sum not exceeding five pounds and not less than ten shillings. 8. Every person who, after the thirty-first day Selling or of December One thousand eight hundred and Kftfr"" sixty-three, shall sell, utter, or expose for sale or tie sis* De- -•' jxj Si. in oember 1863 for any purpose oi trade or manufacture, or snail artloieB with cause or procure to be sold, uttered, or exposed {^g^t o*f **" for sale or other purpose as aforesaid, any chattel ciuantiues, or article upon which shall have been, to his notmore"^ knowledge, put, or upon any cask, bottle, stopper, f'"'° ?■ °f vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other thing together with which such chattel or article shall be sold or uttered or exposed for sale or other purpose as aforesaid, shall have been so put, or upon any case, frame, or other thing used or employed to expose or exhibit such chattel or article for sale shall have been so put, any false description, statement, or other indication of or respecting the ntimber, quantity, measure, or weight of such chattel or article or any part thereof, or the place or country in which such chattel or article shall have been made, manufactured, or produced, shall for every such offence forfeit and pay to Her Majesty a sum not exceeding five pounds and not less than five shillings. 9. Provided always, that the provisions of this Proviao that act shall not be construed so as to make it any \g ^ offence for any person to apply to any chattel or offence to , . , . , ■' '^ 1 , , . 1 . - 1 applynames article, or to any cask, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, or words cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other ^"75^0*"-° thing with which such chattel or article shall be aioating sold or intended to be sold, any name, word, or ex- oiassea of pression generally used for indicating such chattel ™™^'*°' or article to be of some particular class or desorip- 284 Merchandise Marks Act, tion of manufacture only, or so as to make it any offence for any person to sell, utter, or offer or expose for sale any chattel or article to wHcli, or •to any casS, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other thing sold therewith, any such generally used name, word, or expression, as aforesaid shall have been applied. i^saw'P'io" 10. In every indictment, pleading, proceeding, marks and S'Wd document whatsoever in which any trade mafks ^^ ^^^^ ^^^^^ ^® intended to be mentioned it shaU indictments, be sufficient to mention or state the same to be °" a trade mark without further or otherwise de- scribing such trade mark, or setting forth any copy or fac-simUe thereof ; and in every indict- ment, pleading, proceeding, and document what- soever in which it shall be intended to mention any forged or counterfeit, trade mark it shall be sufficient to mention or state the same to be a forged or counterfeit trade mark, without further or otherwise describing such forged or counterfeit trade mark, or setting forth any copy or f ac-simile thereof. Conviotioii 11. The provisions in this act contained of or SSy rigiWOT concerning any act, or any proceeding, judgment, civil remedy or conviction for any act hereby declared to be a misdemeanor or offence, shall not nor shall any of them take away, diminish, or prejudicially affect any suit, process, proceeding, right, or remedy which any person aggrieved by such act may be entitled to at law, in eqviity, or otherwise, and shall not nor shall any of them exempt or excuse any person from answering or making discovery upon examination as a witness or upon interro- gatories, or otherwise, in any suit or other civil proceeding : provided always, that no evidence, statement, or discovery which any person shall be compelled to give or make shall be admissible in evidence against such person in support of any indictment for a misdemeanor at common law or 25 4- 26 Vict. cap. 88.. 285 otherwise, of of any proceeding under the pro- visions of this act. 12. In every indictment, information, con vie- intent to de- tion, pleading, and proceeding against any person an™parUon- for any misdemeanor or other offence against the '" ?°'^t\ provisions of this act in which it shall be neces- alleged in sary to allege or mention an intent to defraud, or ™5,nt,*'i^' to enable another to defraud, it shall be sufficient or proved, to allege or mention that the person accused of having done any act -which is hereby made a misdemeanor or other offence did such act with intent to defraud, or with intent to enable some other person to defraud, without alleging or mentioning an intent to defraud any particular person ; and on the trial of any such indictment or information for any such misdemeanor, and on the hearing of any information or charge of or for any such 'other offence as aforesaid, and on the trial of any action against any person to recover a penalty for any such other offence as aforesaid, it shaU not be necessary to prove an intent to defraud any particular person, or an intent to enable any particular person to defraud any par- ticular person, but it shall be sufficient to prove with respect to every such misdemeanor and offence that the person accused did the act charged with intent to defraud, or with intent to enable some other person to defraud, or with the intent that any other person might be enabled to defraud. 13. Every person who shall aid, abet, counsel, perso^iBwiio or procure the commission of any offence which jo^'^igBion is by this act made a misdemeanor shall also be of a misde- guilty of a misdemeanor. SsoguU^!'^ 14. Every person who shall be convicted or Punishment found guilty of any offence which is by this act merao**" made a misdemeanor shall be liable, at the dis- under this cretion of the court and as the court shall award, to suffer such punishment by imprisonment for 286 Merchandise Marks Act, not more than two years, with or -Without hard labour, or by fine, or both by imprisonment with or without hard labour and fine, and also by im- prisonment 'untU the fine (if any) shall have been paid and satisfied. Recovery ot 15. In every case in which any person shall penaties. j^^^^ committed or done any offence or act . whereby he shall have forfeited or become Kable to pay to Her Majesty any of the penalties or sums of money mentioned in the prtJvisiona of this act, every such penalty or sum of money diall or may be recovered in England, Wales, or Ireland in an action of debt, which any person may as plaintiff for and on behalf of Her Majesty com- mence and prosecute to judgment in any court of record, and the amount of every such penalty or sum of money to be recovered in any such action shaU or may be determined by the jury (if any) sworn to try any issue in such action, and if there shall be no such jury then by the court or some other jury, as the court shall think fit, or instead of any such action being commenced such penalty or sum of money shall or may in England or Wales be recovered by a summary proceeding ' before two justices of the peace having jurisdic- tion in the county or place where , the party offending shall reside or have any place of business, or in the county or place in which the offence shaU have been committed ; and shall or may in Ireland be recovered in like manner by civil bUl in the civil bill court of the county or place in which the offence was committed, or in which the offender shall reside or have any place of business ; and shall or may in Scotland be re- covered by action before the court of session in ordinary form or by summary action before the sheriff of the county where the offence shall have been committed or the offender may reside or have any place of business, which sheriff, upon 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 88. 287 proof of the offence, either by the confession of the person offending or by the o'ath and affirma- tion of one or more credible witnesses, shall con- vict the offender, and find him liable in the penalty or penalties aforesaid as also in expenses ; and it shall be lawful for the sheriff in pronovmcing such judgment for the penalty or penalties and costs to insert in such judgment a warrant in the event of such penalty or penalties and costs not being paid to levy and recover the amount of the same by poinding : provided always, that it shall be lawful to the sheriff, in the event of his dismissing the action and assoilzing the defender, to find the complainer liable in expenses, and any judgment so to be pronounced by the sheriff in such sum- mary action shall be final and conclusive, and not subject to review by advocation, suspension, re- duction, or otherwise. 16. In every case in which any such penalty or summary sum of money forfeited to Her Majesty as herein- proceedings , J J Deior© juB- before mentioned shall be sought to be recovered tioee to be by a summary ■ proceeding before two justices of J'j'^Y2 vict the peace, the offence or act by the committing or c 43. doing of which such penalty or sum of money shall have been so forfeited shall be and be deemed to be an offence and act within the mean- ing of a statute passed in the tweffth year of the reign of Her present Majesty, intituled, " An Act to facilitate the Performance of the Duties of Justices of the Peace out of Sessions within ^ England and Wales with respect to summary Convictions .and Orders ;" and the information, conviction of the offender, and other proceedings for the recovery of the penalty or sum so forfeited shall be had according to the provisions of the said act. 17. In every case in which judgment shall be in actions obtained ii^ any such action as aforesaid for the beaocounted amount of any such penalty or sum of money for in liite 288 Merchandise Marks Act, manner as forfeited to Her Majesty, tie amount thereof moneys pay- shall be paid by tbe defendant to tbe sheriff or able to the the officer of the court, who shall account for the plaintiffs to same in like manner as other moneys payable to cos?s™?S!H.Her Majesty, and, if it not be paid, may be recovered, or the amount thereof levied, or the payment thereof enforced, by execution or other proper proceeding, as money due to Her Majesty ; and the plaintiff suing on behalf of Her Majesty, upon obtaining judgment, shall be entitled to recover . and have execution for all his costs of suit, which shall include a full indemnity for aU costs and charges -which he shall or may have expended or incurred in, about, or for the pur- poses of the action, unless the court, or a judge thereof, shall direct that costs of the ordinary amount only shall be allowed. Limitations 18. No person shaU commence any action or factions, proceeding for the recovery of any penalty, or procuring the conviction of any offender in manner hereinbefore provided, after the expiration of three years next after the committing of the offence, or one year next after the first discovery thereof by the person proceeding. After 31st 19. In every case in which at any time after 1863, TCDd'or the thirty-first day of December one thousand witTa^tS ^ig^* hundred and sixty-three any person shall mark to be Sell or contract to seU (whether by writing or con&aotthat ^^ot) to any other person any chattel or article the mark is -vyith any trade mark thereon, or upon any cask, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other thing together with which such chattel or article shall be sold or con- tracted to be sold, the sale or contract to sell shall in every such case be deemed to have been made with a warranty or contract by the vendor to or with the vendee that every trade mark upon such chattel or article, or upon any such cask, 25 ^26 Vict. cap. 88. 289 bottle, stopper, vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other tting as aforesaid, was genuine and true, and not forged or counterfeit, and not wrongfully used, unless tte contrary shall be expressed in some writing signed by or on behalf of the vendor, and delivered to and accepted by the vendee. 20. In every case in which at any time after After 3ist the thirty-flrst day of December one thousand ^g'T^g^J^jj. eight hundred and sixty-three any person shall of an article sell or contract to sell (whether by writing or ^on upon i?" not) to any other person any chattel or article °'"^ 9"™- upon which, or upon any cask, bottle, stopper, deemed to vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, a" deson>' label, or other thing together with which such tion was chattel or article shall be sold or contracted to ""*■ be sold, any description, statement, or other indication of or respecting the number, quantity, measure, or weight of such chattel or Article, or the place or country in which such chattel or article shall have been made, manufactured, or produced, the sale or contract to sell shall iii every such case be deemed to have been made with a warranty or contract by the vendor to or with the vendee that no such description, statement, or other indication was in any material respect false or untrue, unless the contrary shall be expressed in some writing signed by or on behalf of the vendor, and delivered to and ac- cepted by the vendee. 21. In every case in any suit at law or in in suits at .equity against any person for forging or coun-gq^;?5™ terfeiting any trade mark, or for fraudulently against per- appljdng any trade mark, to any chattel or uB?ng'forged a,rtiole, or for selling, exposing for sale, or utter- ''^j™**^' ing any chattel or article with any trade mark order article falsely or wrongfully applied thereto, or with any ^^lei,\,ni forged or counterfeit trade mark applied thereto, pay award or for preventing the repetition or continuance of S™° '°°' 290 Merchandise Marks Act, any such wrongful act, or tlie committal of any similar act, in wHch the plaintiff shall obtain a judgment or decree against the defendant, the court shaU have power to direct every such chattel and article to be destroyed or otherwise disposed of ; and in every such suit ia a court of law the court shall or may upon giving judg- ment for the plaintiff award a writ of injrmction or injunctions to the defendant commanding him to forbear from committing and not by himself or otherwise to repeat or commit any offence or wrongful act of the like nature as that of which he shall or may have been convicted by such judgment, and any disobedience of any such writ of injunction or injunctions shall be punished as a contempt of court ; and in every such suit at law or in equity it shall be lawful for the court or a judge thereof to make such order as such cotirt or judge shall think fit for the inspection of every or any manufacture or process carried on by the defendant in which any such forged or counter- feited trade mark, or any such trade mark as aforesaid, shall be alleged to be used or applied as aforesaid, and of every or any chattel, article, and thing in the possession or power of the defen- dant alleged to have thereon or in any way attached thereto any forged or counterfeit trade mark, or any trade mark falsely or wrongfully applied, and every or any instrument in the pos- session or power of the defendant used or intended to be or capable of being used for producing or making any forged or counterfeit trade mark, or trade mark alleged to be forged or counterfeit,- or for falsely or wrongfully applying any trade mark ; and any person who shall refuse or neglect to obey any such order shall be guilty of a con- tempt of court. Peiaons 22. In every case in which any person shall do by^forgeries °^ oa.Tise to be done any of the wrongful acts 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 88. 291 following; (that is to say,) shall forge or counter- may i-ocover feit any trade mark ; or for the purpose of sale, aKSnft^the or for the purpose of any manufacture or trade, S""'^ shall apply any forged or counterfeit trade mark to any chattel or article, or to any cask, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or thing in or with which any chattel or article shall be intended to be sold or shall be sold or uttered or exposed for sale, or for any purpose of trade or manufacture ; or shall inclose or place any chattel or article in, ujion, under, or with any cask, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, cover, wrapper, band, reel, ticket, label, or other thing to which any trade mark shall have been falsely applied, or to which any forged or counterfeit trade mark shall have been applied ; or shall apply or attach to any chattel or article any case, cover, reel, wrapper, band, ticket, label, or other thing to which any trade mark shall have been falsely apphed, or to which any forged or counter- feit trade mark shall have been applied ; or shall inclose, place, or attach any chattel or article in, upon, under, with, or to any cask, bottle, stopper, vessel, case, ■ cover, reel, wrapper, band, ticket, label, or other thing having thereon any trade mark of any other person ; every person aggrieved by any such wrongful act shall be entitled to maintain an action or suit for damages in respect thereof against the person who shall be guilty of having done such act or causing or procuring the same to be done, and for preventing the repetition or continuance of the wrongful act, and the com- mittal of any sinular act. 23. In every action which any person shall Defendant under the provisions of this act commence as ^^^^°' plaintiff for or on behalf of Her Maiesty for have fuu 1, J .J j.i_ indemnity recovenng any penalty or sum oi money, it the for costs, defendant shall obtain judgment, he shall be entitled to recover his costs of suit, which shall 2 292 Mercliandise Marks Act. include a full indemnity for all the costs, charges, and expenses by him expended or incurred in, about, or for the purposes of the action, unless the court, or a judge thereof shall direct that costs of the ordinary amount only shall be allowed. A plaintiff 24. In any action which any person shall, penaity°may ii^ider the provisions of this act, commence as be com- plaintiff for on behalf of Her Maiesty for re- pelled to '^ . ^, c -c -J. give Beourity covering any penalty or sum oi money, if it for costs. shall be shown to the satisfaction of the court or a judge thereof that the person suing as plaintiff for or on behalf of Her Majesty has no ground for alleging that he has been aggrieved by the committing of the alleged , offence in respect of which the penalty or sum of money is alleged to have become payable, and also that the person so suing "as plaintiff is not resident within the jurisdiction of the court, or not a person of sufficient property to be able to pay any costs which the defendant may recover' in the action, the court or judge shall or may order that the plaintiff shall give security by the bond or recognisance of himself and a surety, or by the deposit of a sum of money, or otherwise, as the court or judge shall think fit, for the pajrment to the defendant of any costs which he may be entitled to recover in the action. Act not to 25. Nothing in this act contained shall be OoJ^°omtion construed to affect the rights and privileges of H u"*"" hi?' *^® corporation of cutlers of the liberty of Hal- nor to repeal lamshire in the county of York, nor shall any- 69 Geo. 3, thing in this act contained be construed in any way to repeal or make void any of the provi- sions contained in the fifty-ninth George Third, chapter seven, intituled ,"An Act to regulate the Cutlery Trade in England." 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 89. 293 26. The expression "The Merchandise Marks short title. Act, 1862," shall be a sufficient description of this act. THE COMPANIES ACT. (25 & 26 ViOT. CAP. 89.) 4i Act for the Incorporation, Regulation, and Winding-up of Trading Companies and other Associations. — [7th August, 1862.] Sect. 166. If any director, officer, or contri- Penalty on 1 . e 1 J J.1 • i. falsification butory ot any company wound-up under this act of books. destroys, mutilates, alters, or falsifies any books, papers, writings, or securities, or makes or is privy to the making of any false or fraudulent entry in any register, book of account, or other document belonging to the company with intent to defraud or deceive any person, every person so offending shall be deemed to be guilty of a mis- demeanor, and upon being convicted shall be liable to imprisonment for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour. 167. Where any order is made for winding- Prosecution up a company by the court or subject to the qaent'airec. supervision of the court, if it appear in the to™ '■> *« course of such winding-up that any past or pre- winding-up sent director, manager, officer, or member of such *y °°'"''' company has been guilty of any offence in rela- tion to the company for which he is criminally responsible, the court may, on the application of . any person interested in such winding-up, or of its own motion, direct the official liquidators, or ihe liquidators (as the case may be,) to institute and conduct a prosecution or prosecutions for such offence, and may order the costs and expenses to be paid out of the assets of the company. 294 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 103. Prosocntion 168. Where a company is being -wound-up quentdirec- altogether voluntarily, if it appear to the liqui- case of"' ™ ^^^'^^ conducting such winding-up that any past voluntary or present director, manager, officer, or member win ing-up. g£ g^gj^ company has been gnUty of any offence in relation to the company for which he is crimi- nally responsible, it shall be lawful for the liqui- dators, with the previous sanction of the court, to prosecute such offender, and all expenses properly incurred by them in such prosecution shall be payable out of the assets of the company in priority to all other liabilities. Penalty of igg. If ajjy person, upon any examination upon oath or affirmation authorised under this act, or in any affidavit, deposition, or solemn affir- mation in or about the winding-up of any com- pany under this act, or otherwise in or about any matter arising under this act, wilfully and corruptly gives false evidence, he shaU, upon conviction, be liable to the penalties of wilful perjury. UNION ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE ACT. (25 & 26 Vict. cap. 103.) An Act to amend the Law relating to Parochial Assessments in England. — \7th Aitgust, 1862.] Penalty for Sect. 40. Every person who wilfully refuses to ancer&o" to attend in obedience to any lawful order of any obedience to guct committee, or to give evidence, or refuses to committee, produce any rate book, assessment, or valuation which may be lawfully required to be produced' before such committee, shall for every such offence be liable to a penalty not exceeding twenty pounds upon a summary conviction for 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 107. 295 tlie same before two justices of the peace ; and injuring, &o. every person who wilfully injures, defaces, con- a^mMe"-''' ceals, or destroys such rate book, or who upon meaner, any examination before any such committee wil- fully gives false evidence, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. THE JUEIES ACT. (25 & 26 Vict. cap. 107.) An Act to give greater Facilities for summoning Persons to serve on Juries, and for other Pur- poses relating thereto. — [7th August, 1862.] Wheebas it is expedient to amend an act passed 6Geo.4.c.50. in the session in Parliament holden in the sixth year of the reign of his late Majesty King George the Fourth, intituled " An Act for Con- solidating and amending the Laws relative to Jurors and Juries," and also to give greater facilities for summoning persons to serve on amy jury : Be it enacted by the Queen's most excel- lent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Com- mons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same as follows : Sect. I. This act may be cited as " The Juries short title of Act, 1862," and shall be construed with and as "'' *°' part of the said recited act, hereinafter termed the Principal Act. 2. All registered pharmaceutical chemists and Exemptions managing clerks to attorneys, solicitors, and o^^HeZ °^ 'proctors actually practising, aU subordinate officers in gaols ■ and houses of correction shall be and are hereby absolutely freed and exempted from being returned and from serving upon any 296 TAe Juries Act, juries or inquests whatsoever, and shall not be inserted in the lists to be prepared by virtue of the Principal Act or of this act. Pvovisions 3. All the provisions of the Principal Act as to high relating to the functions of high constables shall constables , f , , i j j. x repealed. be and are hereby repealed, «xcept as to any liabilities incurred before such repeal, and the duties of high constables as set forth in the Principal Act shall cease and determine. oierk of the 4. The clerk of the peace in every county, iBsu^pre- riding, and division in England and Wales shall ceptB to pa- on or before the twentieth day of July in every year by post. issue his precept (in the form set forth in the schedule to this act, or as near thereto as may be), to the churchwardens and overseers of the poor of the several parishes, and to the overseers of the poor of the several townships, within the county, riding, or division for which he acts, requiring them to make out before the first day of September then next ensuing a true list of all men residing within their respective parishes and townships qualified and liable to serve on juries according to the Principal Act, and also to per- form and comply with all other the requisitions in the said precepts contained, and shall forward the same, together with a competent number of printed forms of returns, for the use of the re- spective persons by whom such returns are to be made, by post, in a registered letter having the words "Jury Precept" legibly written or printed on the outside thereof, and addressed to the churchwardens and overseers as aforesaid ; and every precept delivered or tendered as a registered letter at the address of the person to whom it is addressed, whether a receipt be given for the same or not, shall be deemed to have been served on the person to whom the same was so delivered or tendered, and if delivered or- tendered to any one churchwarden or overseer of a parish or 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 1.07. 297 township shall be deemed to have been served on the whole of the churchwardens and overseers of such parish or township. 0. The provisions of the Principal Act as to Precepts, 4e. the expense of printing the warrants, precepts, atthe'ex- and returns therein mentioned shall apply to the p^^L"'^' printing of the precepts, and returns required by this act ; and the precepts and jury lists required to be posted and registered by this act shall be posted and registered at the expense of the county, riding, or division. 6. After the receipt of such precept from the Duties and clerk of the peace, the duties of the church- ^^™''^4.°« wardens and overseers with reference to the jury cere to con- lists, and the penalties to which they are liable for making default therein, thall be in all respects the same as if the words "clerk of the peace" had been substituted for the words "high con- stable" in the eighth section of the Principal Act. 7. No notice shall be sent to the high con- as to notices stable of the holding of a special petty sessions p^^^g^s- for the production of the jury lists, as required sions. by the tenth section of the Principal Act. 8. It shall be lawful for the justices of the Justices to peace then present to adjourn any special petty petty ses- sessions held under the provisions of the tenth Bions for the . » ,1 T^ . . T « , I 1 -ii • production section of the Principal Act to any day witnm of list, seven days thereafter, for the production of the jury list for any parish or township which, through the default of any churchwarden or overseer, has been omitted to be produced at such special petty sessions, and notice shall be sent by the clerk to such justices to such church- wardens or overseers requiring them to produce the said list at such adjournment. 9. It shall be the duty of the clerk to the justices' Q clerlitosend O o 298 The Juries Act, jury lists to justices of the peace in every petty sessional peace. division in England and Wales to take charge of the jury lists of each parish and township within such division, when and as soon as they shall have been allowed and signed by the said justices, as by the Principal Act provided, and to forward the same by the next available post in a regis- tered letter or letters, with the words " jury list" legibly written or printed on the outside thereof, addressed to the clerk of the peace for the county, riding, or division, at his office, together with a schedule of the parishes and townships for which jury hsts have been then allowed, which schedule shall be signed by one of the said justices, and the clerk to the justices shall be entitled to the fee of two shillings' and sixpence, to be paid out of the county rate, for the discharge of the duties hereby imposed upon him. Clerk of the 10. The duties of the clerk of the peace with deal wiSi the reference to the jury lists so forwarded to him jury ii8t#as by the clerks to the justices, and the penalties to which he is liable for making default therein, shall be in aU respects the same as if this act had not passed, and the said lists had been returned by the high constables to the court of quarter sessions Trnder the provisions of the Principal Act. All jurors 1 !• -A-ny person liable to serve on any jury may be sum- may be Summoned as heretofore, or in the manner post following ; that is to say, the sheriff or other proper officer may make out a summons and affix the seal of his office thereto, and such sum- mons having the words " jury summons" legibly written or printed on the same side as the address, may be sent open by the post, prepaid, and directed to the person so required to serve as junior at his place of abode as described in " the jurors book," which said summons, together with a duplicate endorsed with the name and 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 107. 299 address of the juror to whom the original sum- mons is directed, shall be taken to the postmaster of any post office where money orders are re- ceived or paid, within such hours as shall have been previously, agreed upon at such post office, and under such regulations with respect to the registration of such summons and the fee to be paid for such registration (which fee shall in no case exceed twopence over and above the ordinary rate of postage) as shall from time to time be made by the Postmaster-General in that behalf ; and iQ all cases in which such fee shall have been duly paid the postmaster shall compare the address of the said summons with that of the duplicate, and on being satisfied that they are alike shall forward the summons to its address by the post, and shall return the duplicate to the party bringing the same, duly stamped with the stamp of the said post office ; and the production by the party who posted such summons of such stamped duplicate shall be evidence of the sum- mons having been delivered at the dwelling-house of the person whose name and address is thereon endorsed, at the place mentioned in such indorse- ment, on the day on which such summons would, in the ordinary course of post, have been de- livered, provided it shall appear that the same was not returned by the post office as undeUvered ; and any summons sent by the post as before mentioned, and not so returned as undelivered, shall be considered in aU respects as duly served ; and in the event of any persons to whom: any summons shall be addressed being ascertained to be dead, or to have permanently left the place to which such summons is addressed, the postmaster or letter carrier of the place in which the summons shall then be shall endorse thereon the reason of the non-delivery thereof, and forward the same in the usual course of post to the Eetumed Letter Office in London, in order that it may be returned 300 The Juries Act, Fines may be remitted upon cause shown. to the sender: Provided always, that when any summons shall be served by post under the pro- visions of this act, two additional days shall be allowed for "the transmission of such summons by post, over and above the number of days required by law for the service of a summons, before the day on which the juror is required to attend. 12. Whenever any fine shall be imposed upon any person for not attending as a juror in obe- dience to a summons in that behalf, it shall not be. lawful to estreat the said fine until after the expiration of fourteen days, and in the mean- time the proper officer of the court by which such fine was imposed shall forthwith, by letter, inform the said person of the imposition of such fine, and require him, within six days after the date of such letter, to forward him an affidavit of the cause, if any, of his non-attendance ; and such officer shall, upon the receipt of any such affidavit, submit the same to the said court, or the judge or chairman who presided at the said court at the time when such fine was imposed, and such court, judge, or chairman shall have power to remit such fine. Sheriffs to be 13. The oosts incurred by any sheriff sum- costrof moning jurors by post, under the provisions of summonses, this act, SO far as the same shall not exceed the sum allowed to such sheriff, or his predecessor in office, on that account, in any one year within the three years immediately preceding the passing of this act, may be included in his ordinary bill of cravings, and shall be allowed by the Commis- sioners of Her Majesty's Treasury. 14. This act shall not extend to Scotland or Ireland ; and nothing in this act contained shall Jury lists to alter or affect the mode of procedure heretofore ?n t^raty"' pursued in the making out of jury lists or the of London summoning of jurors in the city of London. Extent of a6t. 25 ^ 26 Vict. cap. 107. 301 15. This act stall come into operation on the Oommence- tenth day of August one thousand eight hundred "™ " *° and sixty-two. SOHEDTJLE. Precept for retwrnmg Lists of Jvirors. County of "I To the churchwardens and overseers of the to wit \ poor of the parish [or, to the overseers of Hundred I the poor of the township] of of j Tou are hereby required to make out, before the first day of September next, a true list in writing in the form here- unto annexed, containing the names of all men, being natural-born subjects of the Queen, between the ages of twenty-one and sixty, residing within your parish [or town- ship] qualified to serve upon juries; that is to say, of every such man who has in his own name, or in trust for him, a clear income of ten pounds by the year in lands or tene- ments, whether of freehold, copyhold, or customBry tenure, or of ancient demesne, situate in the said county, or in rents issuing out of any such lands or tenements, or in such lands, tenements, and rents taken together, in fee simple or fee tail, or for his own life, or for the life of any other person, and also of every such man who has a clear income of twenty pounds by the year in lands or tenements situate in the said county, held by lease for the absolute term of twenty-one years, or some longer term, or for any term of years deter- minable on any life or lives, and also of every such man who is a householder in your parish [(»■ township], and is rated or assessed to the poor rate or to the inhabited house duty on a value of not less than twenty pounds [if in Middlesex thirty pounds], and you are required to make out the said list in alphabetical order, and to write the christian and surname of every man at full length, and the place of his abode, his title, quality, calling, or business, and the nature of his qualification, in the proper columns of the forms hereunto annexed, according to the specimens given in such columns for your guidance. And if you have not a sufficient number of forms you must apply to me for more ; and in order to assist you in making out the list you are to refer to the poor rate, and you may, if you think proper, apply to any collector or assessor of taxes, or any other officer who has the custody of any house tax, land tax, or other tax assessmeut for your parish [w township], and take from thence the names of men so qualified; And in making. such list you are to omit the names of all peers, all judges, all clergymen, all Eoman Catholic priests who shall have duly taken and subscribed the 302 The Juries Act. oaths and declaration required by law ; all ministers of any congregation of Protestant dissenters whose place of meet- ing is duly registered, provided they follow no secular occupation except that of a schoolmaster, and produce to you a certificate of some justice of the peace of their having taken the oaths and subscribed the declaration re- quired by law ; all Serjeants and barristers at law, .all members of the Society of Doctors of Law, and all advocates of the Civil Law, if actually practising, and all attorneys, solicitors, and proctors, if actually practising, and having taken out their annual certificates, and their managing clerks ; all officers of the Oourta of Law and Equity, and of the Admiralty and Ecclesiastical Courts, if actually exer- cising the duties of their respective offices ; all coroners, all gaolers and keepers of houses of correction, and all sub- ordinate officers of the same ; all members and licentiates of the Koyal College of Physicians in London, all members of the Eoyal Colleges of Surgeons in London, Edinburgh, and Dublin, and apothecaries certificated by the Court of Examiners of the Apothecaries Company^, and all registered pharmaceutical chemists, if actually practising as physicians, surgeons, or apothecaries, or pharmaceutical chemistSj re- spectively ; all officers of the Army and Navy on f uU pay ; the master, wardens, and brethren of the Corporation of Trinity House of Deptford Stroud, and their clerks, officers, and servants ; all pilots licensed by the Trinity House of Deptford Btrond, Engston-upon-Hull, or Newcastle-upon- Tyne, and all masters of vessels in the Buoy and Light Ser- vice employed by either of those corporations, and all pilots licensed under any Act of Parliament or charter for the regulation of pilots; all the household servants of Her Majesty ; all Commissioners of Property and Income Tax ; all officers of the Post Office ; all officers of Customs and Excise ; all sheriffs' officers, high constables, and parish clerks ; all officers of the Eural and Metropolitan Police, and also all persons exempt by virtue of any Act of Parlia- ment, prescription, charter, grant, or writ. And when you have made out such list you are autho- rised to order a sufficient number of copies thereof to be printed, the expense of which printing will be allowed you by the parish [w township], and you are required, on the three first Sundays in September next, to fix a copy of such list, signed by you, on the principal door of every church, chapel, or other public place of religious worship within your parish [or township], and also to subjoin to every such copy a notice to the following effect, inserting the time and place, of which you shall be previously informed : " Take notice, that all objections to the foregoing list will be heard by the justices in petty sessions on the day of September next, at the hour of , at ;" and you must allow any inhabitant of your parish for township] to inspect the original list, or a true copy of it, during the three first weeks of September next, gratis ; and you are also further required to produce the said list at such petty 25 ^' 26 Vict. cap. 114. 303 sesBiouB, and there to answer on oath such questions as shall be put to you by Her Majesty's justices of the peace there present touching the said list; and these several matters you are nowise to omit, upon the peril that may ensue. . Given under my hand at in the said county the day of in the year Clerk of the Peace. The Fmirt of Precept in Wales is to be altered according to the difference of Qiudijication. POACHING PEEVENTION AOT. (25 & 26 VioT. CAP. 114.) An Act for the Prevention of Poaching. — \lth August, 1862.] Wheeeas it is expedient ttat tlie laws now in force for the better detection and prevention of poaching should be amended : Be it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parlia- ment assembled, and by the authority of the same, as foUows : 1. The word " game " in this act shall for all interpreta- the purposes of this act be deemed to include any ti^a one or more hares, pheasants, partridges, eggs of pheasants and partridges, woodcocks, snipes, rabbits, grouse, black or moor game, and eggs of grouse, black or moor game ; and the words " justice " and " justices " in this act shall, unless otherwise provided for, mean respectively a justice and justices of the peace respectively of or for the comity, riding, division, liberty, city, borough, or place in which any game, gun, part of gun, net, snare, or engine after mentioned shall be found. 304 Poaching Prevention Act, Power to 2. It shall be lawful for any constable or peace to searoii oflScer in any county, borough, or place in Great wSutwar- Britain and Ireland, in any highway, street, or rant, in cer- public place? to search any person whom he may tain oaB68. j^^^^g gg^ij cause to suspect of coming from any land where he shall have been unlawfully in search or pursuit of game, or any person aiding or abetting such person, and having in his possession any game unlawfully obtained, or any gun, part of gun, or nets or engines used for the killing or taking game, and also to stop and search any cart or other conveyance in or upon which such constable or peace officer shall have good cause to suspect that any such game or any such article or thing is being carried by any such person, and should there be found any game or any such article or thing as aforesaid upon such person, cart, or other conveyance, to seize and detain such game, article, or thing ; and such constable or peace officer shall in such case apply to some justice of the peace for a summons citing such person to appear before two justices of the peace assembled in petty sessions, as provided in the eighteenth and nineteenth of Her present Majesty, chapter one hundred and twenty-six, section nine, as far as regards England and Ireland, and before a sheriff or any two justices of the peace in Scot- land ; and if such person shall have obtained such game by unlawfully going on any land in search or pursuit of game, or shall have used any. such article or thing as aforesaid for unlawfully killing or taking game, or shall have been acces- sory thereto, such person shall, on being convicted thereof, forfeit and pay any sum not exceeding five pounds, and shall forfeit such game, guns, parts of guns, nets, and engines, and the justices shall direct the same to be sold or destroyed, and the proceeds of such sale, with the amount of the penalty, to be paid to the treasurer of the county or borough where the conviction takes place ; and 25 ^26 Vict. cap. 114., 305 no person who, by direction of a justice in writing, shall seU any game so seized shall be liable to any penalty for such sale ; and if no conviction takes place, the game or any such article or thing as aforesaid, or the value thereof, shaU be restored to the person from whom it had been seized. 3. Any penalty under this act shall be re- Becovery of covered and enforced in England in the same ^'°°' °°' manner as penalties under the act first and second William the Fourth, chapter thirty-two, and in Scotland under the act second and third William the Fourth, chapter sixty-eight, and in Ireland under the Petty Sessions, teland. Act, 1851, when not otherwise directed in this Act. 4. The powers and provisions of the Act of the Provisions eleventh and tweHth years of Her present Majesty, y'^^ * 43^ chapter forty-three, shall extend and apply to extended to this Act, and to all proceedings, matters, and things to be taken, had, and ^one, and to all persons to be proceeded against or taking pro- ceedings under this act. 5. No conviction or order made under this act, NoconTic- or adjudication made on appeal therefrom, shall qnashedfo? be quashed for want of form, or be removed by ^a"' "' certiorari or otherwise into any of Her Majesty's moved by Superior Courts of Eecord ; and no warrant of '^'o^'"''- commitment shall be held void by reason of any defect therein, provided it be therein alleged that the party has been convicted, and there be a good and valid conviction to sustain the same. 6. Any person who shall think himself Power of aggrieved by any such summary conviction may *^^°* appeal to the next court of general or quarter sessions which shall be holden not less than twelve days after the day of such conviction for the county, riding, division, or borough whefein the cause of complaint shall have arisen, provided 306 Misappropriation hy Servants Act, ttat sucli person shall give to tlie complainant a notice in writing of such appeal, and of the cause and matter thereof, within three days after such conTiotion,-- and seven clear days at the least before such sessions, and shall, within three days, enter into a recognizance, or bond of caution in Scotland, with a sufficient surety, before a justice of the peace, conditioned pensonally to appear at the said sessions, and to try such appeal, and to abide the judgment of the court thereupon, and to pay such costs as shall be awarded by the court ; and the court at such sessions shall hear and determine the matter of appeal, and shall make such order therein, with or without costs, to either party, as to the court shall seem fit, and shall, if necessary, issue process for enforcing such judgment. MISAPPEOPEIATION BY SERVANTS ACT. (26 & 27 Vict. cap. 103.) An Act to amend the Law in certain Cases of Misappropriation hy Servants of the Property of their Masters. — [28** July, 1863.] Wheeeas the offence of taking com or other food by a servant from the possession of his master, contrary to his orders, for the purpose of giving the same or of having the same given to the horses or other animals of such master, is by law a felony : And whereas it is desirable to alter the law in this respect : Be it enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and OoAmons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as foUows : 26 ^ 27 Vict. cap. 103. 307 1. If any servant stall, contrary to the orders servants of Us master, take from his possession any com, master's °" pulse, roots, or other food, for the purpose of °°^?' *?•' ^. . ', ' J 1 ■ ii ^ • i without au- giving the same or oi having the same given to thority, for any horse or other animal belonging to or in the of °g?Tkig'the possession of his master, the servant so offending same to their shall not by reason thereof be deemed guilty of horses, &o., or be proceeded against for felony, but shall, on J^ofy'^at"' conviction of such offence before two justices of shaii be the peace, at their discretion, either be im- prigon^en?, prisoned, with or without hard labour, for any ^■ term not exceeding three m.onths, or else shall for- feit and pay such penalty as shall appear to them to be meet, not exceeding the sum of five pounds, and if such penalty shall not be paid, either im- mediately after the conviction or within such period as the said justices shall at the time of the conviction appoint, the servant so offending shall be imprisoned with or without hard labour, for any term not exceeding three months, unless such penalty be sooner paid : Provided always, that if Power to upon the hearing of the charge the said justices Ssmiss case shall be of opinion that the same is too trifling, " '^^SS?'* or that there are circumstances in the case which render it inexpedient to inflict any punishment, they shall have power to dismiss the charge, without proceeding to a conviction : Provided also, that if upon the trial of any servant for feloniously taking from his master any com, pulse, roots, or other food consumable by horses or other animals, such servant shall allege that he took the same under such circumstances as would con- stitute an offence punishable under this act, and thereof shall satisfy the jury charged with his triSl, then it shall be lawful for such jury to re- turn a verdict accordingly ; and thereupon the court before which such trial shall take place shall . proceed to award such punishment against such ' servant as may be awarded by two justices of the peace on the conviction of any person under the 308 Misappropriation hy Servants Act, provisions of this act : Provided also, that in case of nonpayment of any penalty to be imposed by the court on such servant, he shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labour, for any term not exceeding three months, as the court shall order, unless such penalty be sooner paid. Power to 2. Provided always, that if any person shall think agaSwt con- lii^self aggrieved by any conviction under this viction. act, such person may appeal to the next Court of General Quarter Sessions of the Peace which shall be holden not less than twelve days after the day of such conviction, for the county, riding, division, city, borough, or place wherein the cause of com- plaint shall have arisen ; Provided also, that such person shaU give to the informant a notice in writing of such appeal, and of the cause and matter thereof, within three days after such con- viction, and seven clear days at the least before such sessions, and shall also either remain in custody until the said sessions, or shall enter into a recognizance, vrith two sufficient sureties, before a justice of the peace conditioned personally to appear at the said sessions, and to try such appeal, and to abide the' judgment of the court thereupon, and to pay such costs as shall be by the court awarded, or if such appeal shall be against any conviction whereby only a penalty, with or without costs, is adjudged to be paid, shall deposit with the clerk of the convicting justices such a sum of money as such justices shall deem to be sufficient to cover the penalty and costs, if any, so adjudged to be paid, and the costs of the appeal ; and upon such notice being given, and such recognizance being entered into, or such deposit being made, fhe justices before whom such recognizance shall be . entered into or such deposit .shall be made shall liberate such person, if in custody ; and the court • at such sessions shall hear and determine the matter of the appeal, and shall make such or^er 26 ^ 27 Vict. cap. 103. 309 therein, with or without costs to either party, as to the court shall seem meet, and in case of the affirmance of the conviction shall order and adjudge the appellant to be punished according to the conviction, and to pay such costs as shall be awarded, and shall, if necessary, issue process for enforcing such judgment ; and in any case where after any such deposit shall have been made as aforesaid the conviction shall be affirmed the court may order the penalty and costs, if any, thereby adjudged to be paid, together with the costs of the appeal, to be paid out of the money deposited, and the residue thereof, if any, to be repaid to the party convicted ; and in any case where after any such deposit the conviction shall be quashed, the court shall order the money deposited to be repaid to the party convicted ; and in every case where any conviction shall be quashed on appeal as aforesaid, the clerk of the peace or other proper officer of the court shall forthwith indorse on the conviction a memorandum that the same has been quashed ; and whenever any copy or certificate of such conviction shall be made, a copy of such memorandum shall be added thereto, and shall be sufficient evidence that the conviction has been quashed in every case where such copy or certifi- cate would be sufficient evidence of such convic- tion : Provided that the right of appeal against any conviction under this act shall not apply so as to enable any person to appeal against any verdict of a jury as aforesaid. 3. No such conviction, or adjudication made on No cerUo- appeal therefrom, shall be quashed for want of ™'^*' *°' form, or be removed by certiorari into any of Her Majesty's Superior Courts of Eecord ; and no ■ warrant of commitment shall be held void by reason of any defect therein, provided it be therein alleged that the party has been convicted, and there be a good and valid conviction to sustain the same. 310 Penal Servitude Acts Ammdmeml Act, Summary 4. Every offence under tMs act may be prose- may^be un- cuted and every conviction under this act may be v!o/^ * 3^ enforced in tbe manner directed by the Act of the session holden«in the eleventh and twelfth years of Queen Victoria, chapter forty-three ; and aU provisions contained in the said act shall, unless repugnant to any of the provisions of this act, be applicable to such prosecution and conviction, in the same manner as if they were incorporated Except in in this act : Provided that nothing in this act ttieMetropo^ Contained shall in any manner alter or affect any litan police enactments relating to procedure in the case of any offence punishable on summary conviction ■within the City of London or the Metropolitan Police District, or the recovery or application of any penalty for any such offence. Extent of 5. This act shall extend to England only. act. Commence- 6. This Act shall commence and take effect meat of act, f^.^^ ^j^^ g^^^. ^^^ ^j September, one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three. diatrict. PENAL SEEVITUDE ACTS AMENDMENT ACT. (27 & 28 Vict. cap. 47.) An Act to amend the Penal Servitude Acts. — \2hth, July, 1864.] 16 & 17 Vict. Wheeeas two acts were passed, the one chapter iot, 21 Vict, nuiety-nineinthe session of the sixteenth and seven- <=■ 3- teenth years of the reign of Her present Majesty, and the other chapter three in the session of the twentieth and twenty-first years of the same reign, having for their object the substitution of other punishments in Heu of transportation : And whereas it is expedient to amend the said acts: 27 * 28 Vict. cap. 47. 311 Be it enacted by tlie Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with, tbe advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : 1. This act shall be construed as one with the Short titles, above-mentioned acts, and the said acts, together with this act, may be cited for all purposes as the , Penal Servitude Acts, 1853, 1857, and 1864, and each of the said acts may be cited as the Penal Servitude Act of the year in which it was passed. Sentences of Penal Servitude. 2. No person shall be sentenced to penal ser- Length of vitude in respect to any offence committed after penaUeT- the passing of this act for a period of less than vitnde. five years, and where under any act now in force a period of less than five years is the utmost sentence of penal servitude that can be awarded, a- period of five years shall, in respect to any offence committed after the passing of this act, in such 'act be substituted for the less period; and where under any act now in force a period of either less or more than five years may be awarded as a sentence of penal servitude, the least sentence of penal servitude that can be awarded under that act shall, in respect to any offence committed after the passing of this act, be a period of ^ve years ; and where any person shall on indictment be convicted of any crime or offence punishable with penal servitude, after having been previously convicted of felony, or, in Scotland, of any crime, (whether such previous conviction shall haye taken place upon an indict- ment or under the provisions of the act passed in the eighteenth and nineteenth of Victoria, chapter one hundred and twenty-six,) the least sentence of penal servitude that can be awarded in such case shall be a period of seven years. 312 Penal Servitude Acts Amendment Act, Convict Prisons. Punishment 3. One of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries i°n confer of State in Great Britain, and the Lord Lieutenant prisons. or other chief governor in Ireland, may, by warrant under his hand and seal, empower any two or more justices of the peace, to he named in such warrant, acting for any county in which a prison for the reception of convicts under sentence of penal servitude is situate, to order, from time to time, the infliction of corporal punishment on any convict confined in such prison, for an offence committed by such convict in such prison, and against the discipline thereof ; and any two or more justices of the peace thus empowered shall have the same power of adjudi- cating on such offences, and of ordering the> infliction of such punishment, to be exercised under the same conditions as one of the directors of convict prisons would have, and no greater. Licences. Forfeiture of 4. A licence granted under the said Penal licence. Servitude Acts, or any of them, may be in the form set forth in schedule (A.) to this act annexed, and may be written, printed, or lithographed. If any holder of a licence granted in the form set forth in the said schedule (A.) is convicted, either by the verdict of a jury, or upon his own con- fession, of any offence for which he is indicted, his licence shall be forthwith forfeited by virtue of such conviction ; or if any holder of ■ a Ucence granted under the said Penal Servitude Acts, or any of them, who shaU be at large in the United Kingdom, shall, unless prevented by illness or other unavoidable cause, fail to report himself personally, if in Great Britain to the chief police station of the borough or pohoe division, and if in Ireland to the constabulary station, of the locality to which he may go within three days after his arrival therein, and being 27 §■ 28 Vict. cap. 47. 313 a male subsequently once in eacli month, at sucli time and place, in such manner, and to such person as the oliief officer of the constabulary- force to 'wMcli such station belongs shall appoint, or shall change his residence from one police district to another without having previously notified the same to the police or constabulary station to which he last reported himself, he shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be summarily convicted thereof, and his licence shall be forthwith forfeited by virtue of such con- viction, but he shall not be liable to any other punishment by virtue of such conviction. • 5. If any holder of a licence granted in the Offences by form set forth in the said schedule (A.), — j^°^^™ °' "^ 1. Fails to produce his licence when required to do so by any judge, justice of the peace, sheriff, sheriff substitute, police or other magistrate before whom he may be brought charged with any offence, or by any constable or officer of the police in whose custody he may be, and also fails to make any reasonable excuse why he does not produce the same ; or 2. Breaks any of the other conditions of his licence by an act that is not of itself punishable either upon indictment or upon summary conviction ; He shall be deemed guilty o^ an offence punish- able summarily by imprisonment for any period not exceeding three months, with or without hard labour. 6. Any constable or police officer may, without Apprehen- warrant, take into custody any holder of such a hoWer of licence whom he may reasonably suspect of having licence with- committed any offence, or having broken any of the conditions of his licence, and may detain him in custody until he can be taken before a justice p 314 Penal Servitude Acts Amendment Act, of the peace or other competent magistrate, and dealt with according to law. Summary 7. In Endand and Ireland any offence under puntehment this act punSiable summarily may be prosecuted summarily before two or more justices ; as to England, in manner directed by an act passed in the session holden in the eleventh and twelfth years of the reign of Her Majesty Queen Victoria, chapter forty-three, intituled " An Act to facilitate the Performance of the Duties of Justices of the Peace out of Sessions within England and Wales 1 with respect to Summary Convictions and Orders," or any act amending the same ; and as to Ireland, in manner directed by the act passed in the session holden in the fourteenth and fifteenth years of the reign of Her Majesty Queen Victoria, chapter ninety-three, intituled " An Act to con- solidate and amend the Acts regulating the Pro- ceedings of Petty Sessions, and the Duties of Justices of the Peace out of Quarter Sessions in Ireland," or any act amending the same. In Scotland any offence under this act punish- able summarily may be prosecuted upon summary conviction at the instance of the Procurator Fiscal before any sheriff or sheriff substitute, or before any two justices of the county, or before the magistrates or any police magistrate of the burgh in which the offence is committed. ' 8. Where any holder of a Uoence granted in the form set forth in the said schedule (A.) is convicted of an offence punishable summarily under this or any other act, the justices, sheriff, sheriff substitute, or other magistrate convicting the prisoner shall without delay forward by post a certificate in the form given in schedule (B.) to this act annexed, if in England or Scotland to one of Her Majesty's principal Secretaries of State, if in Ireland to the Lord Lieutenant or other chief governor of Ireland, and thereupon Where holder of licence is summarily convicted, convicting magistrate to forward certificate to Secretary of State or Lord Lieu- tenant of Ireland. 27 ^28 Vict. cap. AH. 315 the licence of the said holder may be revoked in manner provided by the said Penal Servitude Acts. - 9. Where any licence granted in the form set Effect of forth in the said schedule (A.) is forfeited by a 0?™™^! conviction of any indictable offence, or is revoked "o" "' in pursuance of a summary conviction under this °™°°' act or any other act of Parliament, the person whose licence is forfeited or revoked shaU, after undergoing any other punishment to which he may be sentenced for the offence in consequence of which his licence is forfeited or revoked, further undergo a term of penal servitude equal to the portion of his term of penal servitude that remained unexpired at the time of his licence being granted, and shall, for the purpose of his undergoing such last mentioned punishment, be removed from the prison of any county, borough, or place in which he may be confined, to any prison in which convicts under sentence of penal servitude may lawfully be confined, by warrant under the hand and seal of any justice of the peace of the said county, borough, or place, and shall be liable to be there dealt with in all respects as if such term of penal servitude had formed part of his original sentence. 10. Provided always, that it shall be lawful for Licences Her Majesty, or for the Lord Lieutenant or other ^■anted in chief governor in Lreland, whenever they shall ^°™^ differ- respectively think fit, to grant from time to time that in"" to convicts under sentence of penal servitude, ^"''^'luie ca.) licences in any other form different from that set forth in schedule (A.), which they may respec- tively consider it expedient to adopt, and contain- ing other and different conditions ; and such last- mentioned licences shall be revocable at pleasure by the authority by which they are granted ; but no holder of such last-mentioned licence shall be deemed guilty of an offence punishable upon sum- p 2 316 Penal Servitude Acts Amendment Act. mary conviction merely by reason of the breach of the conditions of the said last-mentioned licences or any of them. SCHEDULES. Schedule (A.). Order ofl.icmce to a Convict made vnder the Statute, Whitehall, day of 18 Her Majesty is graciously pleased to grant to , who was convicted of at the for the on the , and was then and there sentenced to be kept in penal servitude for the term of and is now confineil in the her royal licence to be at large from the day of his liberation under this order during the remaining portion of his said term of penal servitude, unless the said shall before the expiration of the said term be convicted Of some indictable offence within the United Kingdom, in which case such licence will be immediately forfeited by law, or unless it shall please Her Majesty sooner to revoke or alter such licence. This licenc-e is given subject to the conditions indorsed upon the same, upon the breach of any of which it will be liable to be revoked, whether such breach is followed by a convictioh or not. And Her Majesty hereby orders that the said be set at liberty within thirty days from the date of this order. Given under my hand and seal Conditions. 1. The holder shall preserve his licence and produce it when called upon to do so by a magistrate or police officer. 2. He shall abstain from any violation of the law. 3. He shall not habitually associate with notoriously bad characters, such as reputed thieves and prostitutes. 4. He shall not lead an idle and dissolute life, without visible means of obtaining an honest livelihood. If his licence is forfeited or revoked in consequence of a conviction for any offence, he will be liable to undergo a term of penal servitude equal to the portion of his term of years which remained unexpired when his licenoe was granted, viz., the term of "years. 27^28 Vict, cap. 110. 317 SCHEDtTLE (B.)- Form of Cei-tijlcate of Conviction of Holder of Licence. 1 do hereby certify that A.B., the holder of a licence uoder the Penal Servitude Acts, was on the day of in the year duly convicted by of the offence of and sentenced to CD., Clerk to the said justices. LIMITED PENALTIES ACT. (27 & 28 Vict. cap. 110.) An Act for the Amendment of the Law relating to the Mitigation of Penalties. — \2^thJuly, 1864.] Whbebas by various public acts of Parliament penalties are imposed in respect of certain offences, and it is provided that such penalties are not to be reduced below the limits in such acts specified,: And whereas the provisions of the said public acts are contravened by special enactments introduced into certain local acts, empowering the justices or court having cognisance of offences in certain localities to mitigate all penalties in respect of such offences : And whereas it is expeifient to prevent such contravention as aforesaid of the general law ; Be it enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : 1. Where any public act of Parliament provides jnstioes that in respect of any offence therein mentioned a ^^amtm- penalty is to be imposed of not less than a par- gating tioular sum of money, or of not less than a certain under gene- term of imprisonment or other punishment therein ral powers specified, it shall not be lawful for the justices or court having cognisance of such offence to mitigate Short tiOe. 318 Felony and Misdemeanor, ^c. Act, such penalty below tte limit specified in that act of Parliament, in pursuance of any ■power of miti- gating penalties conferred on such justices or court by any local or private act of Parliament. 2. This act may be cited for all purposes as " The Limited Penalties Act, 1864." Provisions of sect 2 of tills act to apply to triaJs com- menced on or after July 1, 1865. FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR (EVIDENCE AND PEAOTIOE AMENDMENT) ACT. (28 Vict. cap. 18.) An Act for amending the Law of Evidence arui Practice on Criminal Trials. — [9th May, 1865.] Wheeeas it is expedient that the law of evidence and practice on trials for felony and naisdemeanor and other proceedings in courts of criminal judi- cature should be more nearly assimilated to that on trials at nisi prius : Be it enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and , temporal, and Commons, in this present Parlia- ment assembled, and by the authority of the, same, as follows ; that is to say, 1. That the provisions of section two of this act shall apply to every trial for felony or mis- demeanor which shall be commenced on or after the first day of July one thousand eight hundred and sixty-five, and that the provisions of sections from three to eight, inclusive, of this act shall apply to all courts of judicature, as well criminal as all others, and to all persons having, by law or by consent of parties, authority to hear, receive, and examine evidence. 28 Vict cap. 18. 819 2. If any prisoner or , prisoners, defendant or Summing up defendants, shall be defended by counsel, but notg^;[^ff„7 otherwise, it stall be tlie duty of tbe presiding 'eiony and judge, at the close of the case for the prosecution, meaner, to ask the counsel for each prisoner or defendant so defended by counsel whether he or they intend to adduce evidence, and in the event of none of them thereupon announcing his intention to adduce evidence, the counsel for the prosecution shall be allowed to address the jury a second time in support of his case, for the purpose of summing up the evidence against such prisoner or prisoners, or defendant or defendants ; and upon every trial for felony or misdemeanor, whether the prisoners or defendants, or any of them, shall be defended by counsel or not, each and every such prisoner or defendant, or his or their counsel respectively, shall be allowed, if he or they shall think fit, to open his or their case or cases respectively ; and after the conclusion of such opening or of all such openings, if more than one, such prisoner or prisoners, or defendant or defen'dants, or their counsel, shall be entitled to examine such wit- nesses as he or they may think fit, and when all the evidence is concluded to sum up the evidence respectively ; and the right of reply, and practice and course of proceedings, save as hereby altered, shall be as at present. 3. A party producing a witness shall not be How tar allowed to impeach his credit by general evidence be"du-^ "^^ of bad character, but he may, in case the witness credited by shall, in the opinion of the judge, prove adverse, producing, contradict him by other evidence, or, by leave of the judge, prove that he has made at other times a statement inconsistent with his present testimony ; but before such last-mentioned proof can be given the circumstances of the supposed statement, sufficient to designate the particular occasion, must be mentioned to the witness, and As to proof of contrar dictory statements of adverse witness. Cross-ex- aminations as to pre- vious state- ments in writing. Proof of previous conviction of witness may be given. 320 Felony and Misdemean&i', #c. Act. he must be asked whether or not he has made such statement. 4. If a witness, upon cross-examination as to a former statement made by him relative to the subject matter of the indictment or proceeding, and inconsistent with his present testimony, does not distinctly admit that he has made such state- ment, proof may be given that he did in fact make it ; but before such proof can be given the circumstances of the supposed statement, sufficient to designate the particular occasions, inust be mentioned to the witness, and he must be asked whether or not he has niade such statement. 5. A witness may be cross-examiaed as to pre- vious statements made by him in writing or reduced iato writing relative to the subject matter of the indictment or proceeding, without such writing being shown to him ; but if it is intended to contradict such witness by the writing, his attention must, before such contradictory proof can be given, be called to those parts of the writing which are to be used for the purpose of so contradicting him : Provided always, that it shall be competent for the judge, at any time during the trial, to require the production of the writing for his inspection, and he may thereupon make such use of it for the purposes of the trial as he may think fit. 6. A witness may be questioned as to whether he has been convicted of any felony or misde- meanor, and upon being so questioned, if he either denies or does not admit the fact, or refuses to answer, it shall be lawful for the cross-examin- ing party to prove such conviction ; and a certifi- cate containing the substance and effect only (omitting the formal part) of the indictment and conviction for such offence, purporting to be signed by the clerk of the court or other ofiScer having 28 J 29 Vict. cap. 127. 321 tlie custody of the records of the court where the offender was conyioted, or by the deputy of such * clerk or officer (for which certificate a fee of five shillings and no more shall be demanded or taken) shall, upon proof of the identity of the person, be sufficient evidence of the said conviction, without proof of the signature or official character of the person appearing to have signed the same. 7. It shall not be necessary to prove by the as to proof attesting witness any instrument to the validity of ^^e'ssea?!^ which attestation is not requisite, and such instru- ment may be proved as if there had been no attesting witness thereto. 8. Comparison of a disputed writing with any as to com writing proved to the satisfaction of the judge to §|^p„™d°' be genuine shall be pennitted to be made by writing, witnesses ; and such writings, and the evidence of witnesses respecting the same, may be submitted to the court and jury as evidence of the genuineness or otherwise of the writing in dispute. 9. The word "counsel" in this act shall be "Coansei." construed to apply to attorneys in all cases where attorneys are allowed by law or by the practice of any court to appear as advocates. 10. This act shall not apply to Scotland. Not to apply '■^ ^ to Scotland. SMALL PENALTIES ACT. (28 & 29 Vict. gap. 127.) An Act to amend the Law relating to small Penalties, —[lath July, 1865.] Wheebas it is expedient to amend the law relating to small penalties : Beit enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice andcon- p3 322 Small Penalties Act. sent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Com- mons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : 1. This act may be cited for all purposes as "The Small Penalties Act, 1865." Commence- 2. This act shall come into operation on the first day of August, one thousand eight hundred and sixty-five. Deflnition of 3. The word "penalty " in this act shall include any sum 01 money recoverable m a summary manner. Becovery of 4. Whereupon summary conviction any offender small penal- i_j-jni ix i t ties. may be aajudged to pay a penalty not exceedmg five pounds, such offender, in case of nonpajTnent thereof, may, without any warrant of distress, be committed to prison for any term not exceeding the period specnfled in the following scale, unless the penalty shaU be sooner paid : For toy penalty- ^''^ '"t?^S''" ™' Not exceeding ten shillings Seven days. Exceeding ten shillings and) -r, ^ j not exceeding one pound) ^ ' Exceeding one pound but| ^^ ,, npt exceeding two pounds j °^ ' Exceeding two pounds but) „ .-, not exceeding five pounds) Saving as 5. Nothing in this act contained shall affect the labour* power of imposing hard labour in addition to im- prisonment in oases where hard labour might, on nonpayment of the penalty, have been so imposed ' if this act had not been passed. Application 6. This act shall apply to penalties, including costs, recoverable m a sumnaary manner ih pur- suance of any act of Parliament, whether passed before or after the commencement of this act; and all provisions of any act of Parliament ot net. 29 # 30 Vict. cap. 52. 323 authorising, in the case of nonpayment of a penalty not exceeding five pounds, a longer term of im- prisonment than is provided by this act, shall be repealed. _ 7. This act shaU not apply to any penalty N''y^''„J;j'P^y imposed by any act of Parliament relating to the under Reve- Inland Revenue. °™ " '' 8. This act shall extend to England only. Extent of PROSECUTION EXPENSES ACT. (29 & 30 Vict. cap. 52.) An Act to extend the Law relating to the Eocpenses of Prosecutions, and to make Provision for Expenses on Charges of Felony and certain Misdemeanors before examining Magistrates. — \2Zrd July, 1866.] Wheeeas by the act of the seventh year of King 7 Geo. 4, George the Fourth, chapter sixty-four, certain "^ **' provisions were made relating to the allowance of costs, expenses, and compensation to prosecutors and witnesses in cases of prosecutions for felonies and certain misdemeanors therein mentioned, and by an act of the session of the fourteenth and u & 15 Viot fifteenth year of Her Majesty, chapter flfty-flve, "' ^*" the provisions of the said act are extended, and authority is given to one of Her Majesty's Secre- taries of State to regulate the scale of payment to be allowed or ordered under the said act or any other act, as to the rates or scales of payment according to which certificates may be granted by the examining magistrate or magistrates in respect of the expense of any prosecutor or witnesses attending before such magistrate or magistrates : And whereas it is expedient to extend the law 324 Prosecution Expenses Act, relating to expenses in oases of prosecutions to tlie payment of expenses incurred in attending before an ■ examining magistrate or magistrates, and to com- pensation for trouble and loss of time tterein, on any charge of felony bond fide made, and on any case of tlie several classes of misdemeanor enumerated in section twenty-three of the said act of King George the Fourth, or of section two of the said act of Her Majesty, bond fide preferred, although the parties may not be bound over by recog- nizance or subpoena to prosecute or give evidence, and although no committal for trial may take place : Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : Powers of 1. It shall and may be lawful for any magis- magtatnitf ^^^^^ or magistrates, at his or their discretion, and to grant lie or they is and are hereby authorised and em- expenses to powered, at the request or any prosecutor or other SSed person who shall have appeared before such magis- ancL petty trate or magistrates, either by summons or other- cierksto ''^^e, on a charge of felony, bond fide made upon be entitled reasonable and probable cause, or on a charge in depositionn. any case of the several misdemeanors enumerated in section twenty-three of the said act of Bong George the Fourth, and of section two of the said act of Her Majesty, bona fide preferred, and who shall have been examined on such charge of felony and misdemeanor, to grant a certificate of the expenses and of the amount to be allowed for trouble and loss of time to the witnesses so appear- ing and examined on such charge of felony or misdemeanor, in the same manner and to the same or like extent as magistrates are authorised by law to do in cases ol felony and in cases of' misdemeanor enumerated in the said acts, where 29' ^ 30 Vict. cap. 52, 325 a committal for trial takes place or the parties are bound over by recognizance or subpoena to prose- cute and give evidence ; and it shall also be law- ful for such examining magistrate or magistrates to allow to the clerk of tlie magistrates acting for the petty sessional division or district (except where such clerk is paid by salary in lieu of fees) the same fees on taking the depositions on such charge or charges as would be allowed to him, or he would be entitled to at law, in the event of a committal for trial takiag place, and to include such allowance of fees in the certificate. 2. Every examining magistrate signing or Magistratea granting such certificate shall forward the, same oerSacates'' to the clerk of the peace of the county, riding, to forward division, city, or borough within which such petty clerks of the sessional division or district is situate, to be laid f^-'ft '," *'® by him before the next quarter sessions of the Court of peace for such county, riding, division, city, or ^^S5!^^ff4' borough ; and such court shall be at liberty to ""? *"°w allow the amount or so much of the amount wholly or named in the certificate, on the same being cer- P"'''>S'"y' tified by the proper officer of the court of quarter orders for sessions as correct, in accordance with the scale P'^y™™'- of payment fixed or to be from time to time fixed under section five of the act of Her Majesty before referred to, and thereupon to sign an order for pajrment on the treasurer or other officer of the county, riding, or division, or city, liberty, or franchise, in which the offence shall have been committed or supposed to have been committed, in the same ijianner as an order for payment would have been made ui case the parties had been bound over to prosecute, and an indictment had been preferred, and such treasurer or other officer shall pay the amount of such order to the person or persons named therein. 3. This act shall continue in force for three Duration of years next after the passing thereof, and thence ''°*' 326 Reformatory Schools Act, to the end of the then next session of Parlia- ment. Appiico,tion 4. THs act shall not extend to Ireland or °"^'- Scotland. ' EEFOEMATOEY SCHOOLS ACT. (29 & 30 Vict. cap. 117.) An Act to consolidate and amend the Acts relating to Reformatory Schools in Great Britain.— \\Qth August, If'^^-'] Be it enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present ParUament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : Preliminary. Short title. 1. This act may be cited as " The Eef ormatory Schools Act, 1866." ■ Application 2. This Act shall not extend to Ireland. of act. Doflnition of 3. " Managers " shall include any person or persons having the management or control of any school to which this act applies : "Justice " shall apply to England only, and shall mean a justice of the peace having jurisdi'ction in the place where the matter requiring the cogni- zance of a justice arises : "Justices" shall apply to England only, and shall mean two or more justices in petty sessions, and shall include the Lord Mayor or an alderman of the City of London, or a police or stipendiary magistrate or other justice having by law authority to act alone for any purpose with the powers of two justices : terms. 29 (f- 30 Vict. cap. 117. 327 " Magistrate " shall apply to Scotland only, and stall include sheriff, sheriff-substitute, justice of the peace of a county, judge in a police court, and provost or baillie of a city or burgh : " Prison authority " shall in England mean the same persons as are defined to be prison authorities by the Prisons Act, 1865, and in Scotland shall as & 29 viot. mean the administrators of a prison, as defined by °' 'f ^' „. the Prisons (Scotland) Administration Act, 1860 : a. los. " Visiting Justice " shall in Scotland mean the administrators of a prison, defined as aforesaid. Certified Reformatory Schools. 4. One of Her Majesty's principal Secretaries of Mode ot oer- State, hereinafter referred to as the Secretary of lom^ory State, may, upon the application of the managers scbools. of any reformatory school for the better training of youthful offenders, direct one of Her Majesty's inspectors of prisons, who shall be styled the Inspector of Eef ormatory Schools, to examine into the condition and regulations of the school, and to report to him thereon ; and, if satisfied with such report, the Secretary of State may, by writing under his hand, certify that such school is fitted for the reception of such youthful offenders as may be sent there ,in pursuance of this act, and the same shall be deemed a certified reformatory school. No substantial addition or alteration shall be made to or in the buildings of any certified re- formatory school without the approval in writing of the Secretary of State. 5. Every certified reformatory school shall from inspecUon time to time, and at least once in every year, be "' =°^'"''- visited by the Inspector of Eeformatory Schools ; and the Secretary of State, if dissatisfied with the condition of such school as reported to him, may withdraw the certificate, and may by notice under his hand, addressed and sent to the managers of such 328 Beformatory Schools Act, school, declare that the certificate is withdrawn as from a time specified in the notice, being not less than six months after the date of the notice. Power to 6. The Secretary of State may from time to time aStontto ^PP0™t a fit person to assist the Inspector of (napeotor. Reformatory Schools ; and every person so appointed shall have such of the powers and duties of the inspector as the Secretary of State from time to time prescribes, but shall act under the direction of the inspector. HeBignation 7. The managers of any certified reformatory by m»na-°''° school may, upon giving six months, and the gers. executors or administrators of a deceased manager (if only one) of any certified reformatory school may, upon giving one month's previous notice in writing of their intention so to do, resign the certificate given to such school ; and accordingly at the expiration of six months or one month (as the case may be) from the date of the notice (unless before that time the notice is withdrawn), the certificate shall be deemed to be resigned. LiabUities 8- The managers of a certified reformatory of managers gohool may decline to receive any youthful offen- der proposed to be sent to them under this act, but when they have once received him they shall be deemed to have undertaken to educate, clothe, lodge, and feed him during the whole period for which he is liable to be detained in the school, or until the v^ithdrawal or resignation of the certificate takes effect, or until the contribution out of money provided by Parliament towards the custody and maintenance of the offenders de- tained in the school is discontinued, whichever shall first happen. EfEeotof 9- Whenever the certificate is withdrawn from of'OTrHfl™' or resigned by the managers of a reformatory oate. school no youthful offender shalljbe received into such school after the date of the receipt by the 29 ^30 Vict. cap. 117. 329 managers of the school of the notice of with- drawal or after the date of the notice of resigna- tion (as the case may be) ; but the obligation of the managers to educate, clothe, lodge, and feed any youthful offenders in the school at the re- spective dates aforesaid shall, excepting so far as the Secretary of State may otherwise direct, be deemed to continue until the withdrawal or resignation of the certificate takes effect, or until the contribution out of money provided by Parliament towards the custody and maintenance of the offenders detained in the school is dis- continued, whichever shall first happen. 10. When the withdrawal or resignation of Disposal of the certificate of a reformatory school takes effect, ^Xdraw™ the youthful offenders detained therein shall be, or resigna- by the order of the Secretary of State, either dis- eertifleate. charged or transferred to some other certified reformatory school. 11. A notice of a grant of any certificate to a Pumioation reformatory school, or of the withdrawal or°J^^i,f*°* resignation of such a certificate, shall within one flrawal of month be advertised by order of the Secretary of State, as to a school in England in the London Gazette, and as to a school in Scotland in the Edinburgh Gazette. 12. The managers of any certified reformatory Power to school may from time to time make all necessary ^^^^ ™'°^ rules for the management and discipline of the school under their charge, but such rules shall not be contrary to the provisions of this act, and shall not be enforced untU they have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Secretary of State, and no alteration shall be made without the approval in writing of the Secretary of State in any rules so approved. 13. Every officer of a certified reformatory offleers to school authorized by the managers of the school, *""« P''™- 830 Reformatory Schools Act, legca, &0. of in writing under tlieir hands or tlie hand of their secretary, to take charge of any youthful offender sentenced to detention under this act for the pur- pose of coaveying him to or from the school, or of bringing him back to the school in case of his escape or refusal to return, shall, for such purpose and while engaged in such duty, have all such powers, authorities, protection, and privileges for the purpose of the execution of his duty as a reformatory ofiScer as any constable duly appointed has within his constablewick by common law, statute, or oustoia. Commitment of Offenders to and their Status at a Certified Reformatory School. onendere 14. Whenever any offender who, in the judg- yearaof age ™ent of the court, justices, or magistrate before may bs sent whom he is charged, is under the age of sixteen to certified . • a. ? • j- i t ■ reformatory years, IS convicted, on indictment or m a summary schools. manner, of an offence punishable with penal servitude or imprisonment, and is sentenced to be imprisoned for the term of ten days or a longer term, the court, justices, or magistrate may also sentence him to be sent at the expiration of his period of imprisonment, to a certified reformatory school, and to be there detained for a period of not less than two years and not more than five years : Provided always, that a youthful offender under the age of ten years shall not be so directed to be sent to a reformatory school unless he ha« been previously charged with some crime or offence punishable with penal servitude or im- prisonment, or is sentenced in England by a judge of assize or court of general or quarter sessions, or in Scotland by a circuit court of justiciary or sheriff. The particular school to which the youthful • offender is to be sent may be named either at the time of his sentence being passed, or within seven 29 4; 30 Vict. cap. 117. 331 days thereafter, by tlie court, justices, or magis- trate who sentenced Mm, or in default thereof at any time before the expiration of his imprison- ment by any visiting justice of the prison to which he is committed. In choosing a certified reformatory school, the court, justices, magistrate or visiting justice shall endeavour to ascertain the religious persuasion to which the youthful offender belongs, and, so far as is possible, a selection shall be made of a school conducted in accordance with the religious per- suasion to which the youthful offender appears to the court, justices, magistrate, or visiting justice to belong, which persuasion shall be specified by the court, justices, magistrate, or visiting justice. It shall be lawful, upon the representation of the parent, or in the ease of an orphan then of the guardian or nearest adult relative, of any offender detained in any such school, for- a minister of the religious persuasion of such offender, at certain fixed hours of the day, which shall be fixed by the Secretary of State for the purpose, to visit such school for the purpose of affording religious assistance to such offender, and also for the purpose of instructing such offender in the principles of his religion. 15. The gaoler of every prison having in his Eemovai ot custody any youthful offender sentenced to be ceStod '° sent to a reformatory school shall at the ap- reformatory pointed time deliver such offender into the cus- tody of the superintendent or other person in charge of the school in which he is to be de- tained, together with the warrant or other docu- ment in pursuance of which the offender was imprisoned and is sent to such school. , The possession of the warrant or other docu- ment in pursuance of which a youthful offender is sent to a certified reformatory school shall be a suflSoient authority for his detention in such school. 332 Reformatory Schools Act, parent, '&c ^^' '^^ parent, step-parent, or guardian, or if to apply to there be no parent, step-parent, or guardian, then offender to ^^ god-parent or nearest adult relative of any a school _ youtMul offender sent or about to be sent to a accordance certified reformatory school which is not con- fender's ducted in accordance ■with the religious persuasion religious to which the offender belongs, may apply to the persuasion. ^^^^ ^y whom such offender was sentenced to be sent to a reformatory school, or to the visiting justices of the prison to which he was committed by that court, or to the justices or magistrate by whom he was sentenced to be sent to a reforma- tory school (or justices or a magistrate having the like jurisdiction), to send or to remove such offender to a certified reformatory school con- ducted ia accordance with the offender's religious persuasion, and the court, visiting justices, jus- tices, or magistrate (as the case may be) shall^ upon proof of such offender's religious persuasion, . comply with the request of the applicant, pro- vided : First, that the application be made before the offender has been sent to a certified reforr matory school, or within thirty days after his arrival at such a school ; Secondly, that the applicant show to the satis- faction of the court, visiting justices, justices, or magistrate that the managers of the school named by him are willing to receive the offender. Discharge or 17. The Secretary of State may at any time order™' ^^ order any offender to be discharged from a certi- Secretary of fied reformatory school, or to be removed from one certified reformatory school to another, but so that the whole period of detention of the offender in a reformatory school shall not be in- creased by such removal. The Secretary of State may also at any time, after having given ten days' notice to the 29 ^ 30 Vict. cap. 117. 333 managers, order a youthful offender under sen- tence of detention in a reformatory or industrial school established under any other act of Parlia- ment, the general rules for the government whereof have been approved by the Secretary of State, to be discharged from such school, or to be removed therefrom to amy certified reformatory school, and in case of removal the youthful offender shall after such removal be deemed to be subject in all respects to the provisions of this act, but so that the whole period of detention of the offender under his sentence shall not be increased by such removal. 18. The managers of a certified reformatory Placing school may, at any time after the expiration of Curon°" eighteen months of the period of detention i^oo^-I allotted to a youthful offender, by licence under their hands, permit him to live with any trust- worthy and respectable person named in the licence willing to receive and take charge of him. Any licence so granted shall not be in force for more than three months, but may at any time before the expiration of such three months be renewed for a further period not exceeding three months, to commence from the expiration of the previous period of three months, and so from time to time until the youthful offender's period of detention is expired. Any such licence may also be revoked by the managers of the school, by writing under their hands, at any time before the expiration of such period of three months, and thereupon the youth- ful offender to whom the licence related may be required by the managers, by writing under their ' hands, to return to the school. The time during which a youthful offender is absent from a certified reformatory school in pursuance of a licence under this section shall, except where such licence has been forfeited by 334 Beformatory Schoeh Act, Power to apprentice offenders. Hefusal to conform to rules. Escaping from schooL his misconduct, be deemed to be part of the time of his detention in the school, and at the expira- tion of the time fixed by his licence he shall be taken baA to the school. Any youthful offender escaping from the person with whom he is placed in pursuance of this section, or refusing to return to the school at the expiration of the time fixed by his licence, or any renewal thereof, or when required to do so on the revocation of his licence, shall be liable to the same penalty as if he had escaped from the school itself. 19. The managers of a certified reformatory school may, at any time after an offender has been placed out on licence as aforesaid, if he conducted himself well during his absence from the school, bind him, with his own consent, apprentice to any trade, calling, or service, notwithstanding that his period of detention has not expired ; and every such binding shall be valid and effectual to all intents. Offences in relation to Reformatory Schools. 20. If any offender detained in a certified reformatory , school wilfuUy neglects or wilfuEy refuses to conform to the rules thereof, he shall, upon summary conviction before a justice or magistrate having jurisdiction in the place or district where the school is situate, be imprisoned, with or without hard labour, for any term not exceeding three months ; and at the expiration of the term of his imprisonment he shall, by and at the expense of the managers of the school, be hrought back to the school from which he was taken, there to be detained during a period equal to so much of his period of detention as remained unexpired at the time of his being sent to prison. 21. If any offender sentenced to be detained in 29 4- 30 Vict. cap. 117. 335 a certified reformatory school escapes therefrom, he may, at any time before the expiration of his period of detention, be apprehended without warrant, and, if the managers of the school think fit, but not otherwise, may (any other act to the contrary notwithstanding) be then brought before a justice or magistrate having jurisdiction in the place or district where he is found, or in the place or district where the school from which he escaped is situate ; and he shall thereupon be liable, on summary conyiction before such a justice or magistrate, to be imprisoned, with or without hard labour, for any term not exceeding three months ; and at the expiration of such term he shall, by and at the expense of the managers of the school, be brought back to the school from which he escaped, there to be detained during a period equal to so much of his period of deten- tion as remained unexpired at the time of his escaping. 22. Every person who commits any of the Penalty on foUowmg offences (that is to say,)— Sng'of-' First, knowingly assists directly or indirectly lenders to, an offender detained in a certified refer- cerMea™"" matory school to escape from the school ; retoi-matory Second, directly or indirectly induces such an offender to escape from the school ; Third, knowingly harbours, conceals, or pre- vents from returning to the school, or assists in harbouring, conceahng, or preventing from returning to the school, any offender who has escaped from a certified reformatory school, — shall, on summary conviction before two justices or a magistrate, be hable to a penalty not exceed- ing twenty pounds, or, at the discretion of the justices, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two months, with or without hard labour. 336 Reform-xtory Schools Act, Expenses of Reformatory Schools. Expenses of 23. The expense of conveying to any certified ana™iothing reformatory sclaool any youtMul offender who has beenf directed to be detained in such a school, and the expense of proper clothing for him requi- site for his admission to the school, shall be defrayed as a current expense by the prison authority within whose district he has been last imprisoned. Contribu- 24. The Commissioners of Her Majesty's trea- Treasury. ^"^7 ^^7 contribute, out of money provided by Parliament, such sum as the Secretary of State may recommend towards the expenses of the custody and maintenance of any offender detained in a certified reformatory school, or in discharge of the expenses of any removal of an offender which has been ordered under the provisions of this act. Order of 25. The parent or step-parent or other person conSntion l^g^^ty liable to maintain any youthful offender to main- detained in a certified reformatory school shall, if offenders in of Sufficient ability,' contribute to his support and school. maintenance therein a sum not exceeding five shillings per week. On the complaint of the inspector of reformatory schools, or of any agent of the inspector, or of any constable under the directions of the inspector (with which directions the constable is hereby required to comply), at any time during the con- tinuance of the offender in the school, any justices or magistrate having jurisdiction at the place where the parent, step-parent, or other person liable as aforesaid resides, may, on summons to the parent or step-parent or other person liable as aforesaid, examine into his or her ability, and may, if they or he think fit, make an order or decree on him or her for the payment to the inspector of reformatory schools, or to an agent of the inspector, of such weekly sum, not exceed- 29 4- 30 Vict. cap. 117. 337 ing five stillings per week, as to ttem or him seems reasonable, during the whole or any part of the period for which the offender is liable to be detained in the school. Every such order or decree may specify the time during which the payment is to be made, or may be until further order. In Scotland any such order or decree shall be held to be and to have the effect of an order or decree in each and every week for payment of the sum ordered to be paid for such week ; and under the warrant for arrestment therein contained (which the magistrate is hereby authorised to grant if he sees fit) it shall be lawful to arrest weekly, for payment of such weekly sum as afore- said, the wages of the defender due and current, and such arrestment shall attach not only to the wages due and payable to the defender at the date thereof, but also to the wages current for the week or other term or period in which such an-estment is executed, any law or statute not- withstanding. Every such payment shall go in relief of the charges on Her Majesty's Treasury, and shall be accounted for as the Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury direct. The Secretary of State may, in his discretion, remit all or any part of any payment so ordered. 26. Any justices or magistrate having jurisdic- Variation o( tion to make such order or decree may from time to time vary the same as circumstances require, on the appHcation either of the person on whom the order or decree is made, or of the inspector of reformatory schools, or of any agent of the in- spector, on fourteen days notice being first given of such application to the inspector or agent, or to such person respectively. 27; Any prison authority may contract with Power of the managers of any certified reformatory school Sority'to' Q 338 Reformatory Schools Act, contract for the reception and maintenance therein of gera ™°*" offenders whose detention in a certified reforma- schools. toiy school is directed by a court, or justices, or a magistrate, acting for or within the district of the contracting prison authority, in consideration of such payments as may be from time to time agreed on. Contribu- 28. A prison authority in England may fi-om t^shment time to time contribute such sums of money, and and enlarge- upon such conditions as it may think fit, towards certified the alteration, enlargement, or rebuilding of cer- Teformatory tiggd reformatory school, — or towards the support of the inmates of such a school, — or towards the management of such a school, — or towards the establishment or building of a school intended to be a certified reformatory school, — or towards the purchase of any land required for the use of an existing certified reformatory school, or for the site of any school intended to be a certified refor- matoiy school ; provided, — First, that not less than two months previous notice of the intention of the prison autho- rity to take into consideration the making of such contribution, at a time and_ place to be mentioned in such notice, be given by advertisement in some one or more public newspaper or newspapers circulated within the district of the prison authority, and also in th^ manner in which notices relating to business to be transacted by that authority are usually given : Secondly, that where the council of a borough is the prison authority, the order for the contribution be made at a special meeting of the council : Thirdly, that where the contribution is for alter- ation, enlargement, rebuilding, establishment, or building of a school or intended school, or for purchase of land, the approval of the 29 4- 30 Vict. cap. 117. 339 Secretary of State be previously given for that alteration, enlargement, rebuilding, esta- blishment, building, or purchase. In Scotland a county board may contribute to any certified reformatory school with the consent and in the manner provided by The Prisons (Scot- land) Administration Act, 1860. 29. In order to obtain the approval of the Secre- Mode of tary of State as aforesaid where required, the "anctton^of managers of the school, or promoters of the in- Secretary of tended school, shall forward to the Secretary of "' State particulars of the proposed establishment or purchase, and a plan of the proposed alteration, enlargement, rebuilding, or building, drawn on such scale, and accompanied by such particulars and estimate of cost, as the Secretary of State thinks fit to require ; and the Secretary of State may approve of the plan and particulars submitted to him, with or without modification, or may dis- approve of the same, and his approval or disap- proval shall be certified by writing under his hand. 30. Expenses incurred by a prison authority in Expenses England in carrying into effect the provisions of auttioriHes this aci* shall be deemed expenses incurred by J'"* 5°"?'^' that authority in carrying into effect the pro- defrayed, visions of The Prisons- Act, 1865, and shall be defrayed accordingly. Expenses incurred by a county board in Scot- land in carrying into effect the provisions of this act shall be a charge on the assessment for cur- rent expenses incurred by that board in carrying into effect the provisions of The Prisons (Scot- land) Administration Act, 1860. Houses of Refuge, ^c, in Scotland: 31. Where in any city, town, or place in Scot- power for land - there has been erected under Local Act of J°^' ^o^igj, Parliament or otherwise any house of refuge for in Scotland youthful offenders, or any reformatory school or offende™ Q 2 840 Eeformatory Schools Act, other similar institution, the commissioners, direc- tors, or managers thereof may receive and main- tain therein if willing so to do, all such young persons as are sent thereto under this act, and may pay such portion of the fund under their control . as they think proper for the training, maintenance, and disposal of such young persons : Provided that such house of refuge, school, or in- stitution is certified as a reformatory sfchool under this act, and the rules thereof, and all alterations thereof from time to time, are approved by the Secretary of State. Conditional Pardons. Power to 32. Where before or after the passing of this itateSemi ^"t a youthful offender has been sentenced to offenders to transportation, penal servitude, or imprisonment, soioois'oii^ and has been pardoned by Her Majesty on condi- oonditiorai ^Jqjj gf j^jg placing himself under the care of some charitable institution for the reception and refoi"- mation of youthful offenders, the Secretary of State may direct him, if under the age of sixteen years, to be sent to a certified reformatory school, the managers of which consent to reomve him for a period of not less than two years and not more than five years ; and thereupon such offender shall be deemed to be subject to all the provisions of this act, as if he had been originally Sentenced to detention in a certified reformatory school. Evidence. 33. The following rules shall be enacted with respect to evidence under this act : (1.) The production of the London or Edinhurgli Gazette, containing a notice of the grant or withdrawal of a certificate by the Secretary of State to or from a reformatory school, or of the resignation of any such certifi- cate, shall be sufficient evidence of the fact of the publication of such notice. KuleB re- specting evidence under tbis ct. 29 (J- 30 Vict. cap. 1X7. 341 and. also of the fact of a certificate having been duly granted to or withdrawn from the school named in the notice, or resigned by the managers thereof. (2.) The grant of a certificate to a certified school may also be proved by the produc- tion of the certificate itself, or of a copy of the same, purporting to be signed by the Inspector of Reformatory Schools. (3.) The production of the warrant or other document in pursuance of which a youth- ful offender is directed to be sent to a certified reformatory school, with a state- ment indorsed thereon or annexed thereto, purporting to be signed by the superinten- dent or other person in charge of the school, to the effect that the offender therein named was duly received into and is at the date of the signing thereof de- tained in the school, or has been other- wise dealt with according to law, shall in all proceedings relating to such offender be evidence of the identity of and of the due conviction and imprisonment of and sub- ■ sequent detention of the offender named in the warrant or other document. (4.) A copy of the rules of a certified reforma- tory school, purporting to be signed by the Inspector of Eeformatory Schools, shall be evidence of such roles in all legal proceed- ings whatever. (5.) A school to which any youthful offender is directed to be sent in pursuance of this act shall, until the contrary is proved, be deemed to be a certified reformatory school within the meaning of this act. Legal Proceedings. 34. The following Acts, that is to say — Recovery of In England, the act of the session of the ?«»*'"««• 342 Reformatory Schools Act, eleventh and twelfth years of Her present Majesty/chapter forty-tkree, intituled " An Act to facilitate the Performance of the Duties of Justices of the Peace out of Sessions within England and Wales, with respect to summary Convictions and Orders, and any Acts amending the same;" In Scotland, " The Summary Procedure Act. 1864,"— shall apply to all offences, payments, and orders in respect of which jurisdiction is given to justices or a magistrate by this act, or which are directed to be prosecuted, enforced, or made in a summary manner or upon summary conviction. Service of 35. Any notice may be served on the managers nmnagers of °^ * certified reformatory school by delivering the schools, same personally to any one of them, or by sending it, by post or otherwise, in a letter addressed to them or any of them at the school, or at the usual or last known place of abode of any manager, or of their secretary. Forms. Use of 36. No summons, notice, or order made for the '°'h"d 'i° pnrpose of carrying into effect the provisions of this Act shall be invahdated for want of form, only, and the forms in the schedule to this act annexed, or forms to the like effect, may be used in the oases to which they refer, with such variations as circumstances require, and when used shall be deemed sufScient. Repeal of Enactments. Eaaotmeuta 37. There shall be repealed the enactments named re- liereinafter mentioned, that is to say, — pealed Section eleven of the act of the session of the 1 ^'2 Vici. first and second years of Her present Majesty, <^- ^'^- chapter eighty-two, intituled " An Act for esta- blishing a Prison for young Offenders ;" 29 4- 30 Vict. cap. 117. 343 The act of the session of the seventeenth and n & is vict. eighteenth years of Her present Majesty, chapter °''^' eighty-six, intituled " An Act for the better Care and Eeformation of youthful Offenders in Great Britain ;" The act of the session of the eighteenth and is & 19 vict. nineteenth years of Her present Majesty, chapter °" *^' eighty-seven, intituled " An Act to amend the Act for the better Care and Eeformation of youth- ful Offenders, and the Act to render Eeform- atory and Industrial Schools in Scotland more available for the benefit of Vagrant Children ;" The act of the session of the nineteenth and is & 20 vict. twentieth years of Her present Majesty, chapter one hundred and nine, intituled " An Act to amend the Mode of committing Criminal and Vagrant Children to Eeformatory and Industrial Schools ;" The act of the session of the twentieth and 20 & 21 viot twenty-first years of Her present Majesty, chapter '"'■ fifty-five, intituled "An Act to promote the Esta- blishment and Extension of Eeformatory Schools in England :" Provided that such repeal shall not affect — 1. Any certificate given or anything duly done under any act hereby repealed : 2. Any penalty, forfeiture, or other punishment incurred under any act hereby repealed, or any remedy for recovering or enforcing the 38. This act shall apply to all reformatory Application schools certified under the acts hereby repealed, existtng or any of them, and to all offenders sent to any certified SCuOOlS reformatory school under the acts hereby repealed, or any of them, ■ in the same manner in aU respects as if such schools had been certified and such offenders had been sent thereto under this act, with this qualification, that no youthful offender shall be detained in any reformatory 344 Reformatory Schools Act, school in pursuance of any order made under the repealed acts, or any of them, for a longer period ( than he would have been liable to be detained therein if this act had not been passed. SCHEDULE. FOBMS. (A.) Conviction. \ Be it remembered, that on the day of to wit. j* at in the said [counMf] of A.B., under the age of eixteen years, to wit, of the age of [Ihirtem] years, is convicted before ns, two of Her Majesty's justices of the peace for the said [counit/]: for that [^c, state offence in vsuatTnanner] ; and we adjudge the said A.B., for his said offence to be imprisoned in the [piisonl at in the said [comiit/], [cmd to be there kept to hard labour] for the space of . : And that, in pursuance of " The Eeformatory Schools Act, 1866," we also sentence the said A.B. (whose religious persuasion appears to us to be- ) to be sent, at the expiration of the term of imprisonment aforesaid, to Eeformatory School at in the county of (the managers whereof are willing to receive him) [(»• to some certified reformatory school to be hereafter, and before the expiration of the term of imprisonment aforesaid, named iu this behalf], and to be there detained for the period of commencing from and after the day of [the date of the expiration of the sentence^. Given under our hands and seals, the day and year first above mentioned, at in the [coimtti] aforesaid. J.S. (liS.) L.M. (L.S.) (B.) Order of Detention. 1 To the constable of , and to the keeper to wit. ) of the [jjraore] at in the said [countt/] of Whereas A.B., late of [labourer'], under the age of sixteen years, to wit, of the age of [thirteen.} years, was this day duly convicted before the undersigned, two of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the said [cotfn/fj of , for that [^c, stating the offence as in the conmc- tionj, and it was thereby adjudged that the said A.B., for 29 # 30 Vict. cap. 117. 345 his said offence, should be imprisoned in the [pi-iaoii] at in the said [cotmtt/'], [and ie there kept to Kurd labour] for the space of ; and in pursuance of " The Eetormatory Schools Act, 1866," the said A.B. (whose religious persuasion appeared to us to be } was thereby sentenced to be sent, at the expiration of the terra of imprisonment aforesaid, to the Beformatory School at in the county of (the managers whereof are willing to receive him therein), [or to some cer- tified reformatory school to be before the expiration of the said term named in that behalf,] and to be there detained for the period uf commencing from and after the day of [the date of the expiration of the These are therefore to command you, the said constable of , to take the said A.B., and him safely convey to the [pi-ison^ at aforesaid, and there to deliter him to the keeper thereof, together with this precept: And we do hereby command you, the said keeper of the said [prisony to receive the said A.B. into your custody in the said [prison], there to imprison him [and keep him to hard labomr'] for the space of ; [And we further command you, the said keeper, to send the said A.B. at the expiration of his term of imprisonment aforesaid as and in the manner directed by the Beformatory Schools Act, 1866, to the Eeiormatory School at aforesaid [or to the reformatory school named by an order indorsed hereon under the hands and seals of us, or undei: the hand and seal of one other of Her Majesty's justices of the peace for the said county, being a visiting justice of the said prison], together with this order:] And for so doing this shall be your sufli- cient warrant. Given under our hands and seals, this day of in the year of our Lord at in the [cmmty] aforesaid. J.S. (us.) L.M. (L.S.) (0.) Nomination o^ School indiyraed on the Order oy Detention, In pursuance of The Beformatory Schools Act, 1866, I, the undersigned, one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace for the [cowUi/J of hereby name the Befor- matory School at in the county of as the school to which the within-named A.B. Qwhose religious persuasion appears to me to be ) is to be sent as within provided [add where required in lieu of the school within (or above) named]. Given under my hand and seal, this day of at in the county of E.F. (L.S.) Q 3 346 Beformatory Schools Act, (D.) Complaint for enfordng in England Contribution from Parent, ^c. \ The complaint of the inspector of reformatory to wit. J schooli [or as the case may he] made to UB, the undersigned, two of Her Majesty's justices of' the peace for the said county of , this day of at in the same county, who says, that one A.B. of (*) the age of years, or thereabouts, is now detained in the Beformatory School at in the county of , under the Reformatory Schools Act, 1866, and has been duly ordered and directed to be detained therein until the day of : That one C.B., dwelling in the parish of in the county of , is the parent [or step-parent, &c.] of the said A.B., and is of suiS- cieut ability to contribute to the support and maintenance of the said A.B., his son ; (*) The said complainant therefore prays that the said C.B. may be summoned to show cause why an order should not be made on him so to con- tribute. Exhibited before us, C.I>. J.S. L.M. (E.) Summons to Parents^ ^c, {This will he in Form (A.) i/n Schedule to 11 ^ 12 Vict. c. 43.) (P.) Order on Parent, t^c, in England to contr^mte a Weeklg Sum. \ Be it remembered, that on this day of to wit. J at in the said [oorai^l of a certain complaint of the inspector of reiormatory schools [or as the case may be], for that one A.B. of, &o. [stating the cause of complaint, as in the foi-m (p.) between the asterislcs (*) (*)], was duly heard by and before us, the undersigned, two of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the said [county] of (in the presence and hearing of the said C.B., t/ so, or the said O.B. not appearing to the summons duly issued and served in this behalf ; and we, having duly examined into the ability of the said C.B., and on conside- ration of all.the circumstances of the case, do order the said O.B. to pay to the said inspector for to an agent of the said inspector] the sum of shfllings per week from the date of this order until the day of , the same to be paid at the expiration of each Lfourteen, or, as the case may be, days"]. Given under our hands and seals, the day and year first above mentioned, at ia the [coimty'] aforesaid. J.S. (L.S.) L.M. (i,.s.) 29 4- 30 Vict. cap. 117. 347 (G.) Distress Wan-ant for Amount in arraar. ) To the coustiible of , and to all other to wit J peace officers in the said {county] of , ' Whereas, on the hearing of a complaint trnade by the inspector of reformatory schools \or as the case may Se], that A.B., of, Ac. \stoMng the came oj complaint as in the form (D.) between the asterisks (*) (*)], an order was made on the day of by us, the undersigned [or by L.M. and J.fi.], two of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the said [county'] of against the said O.B., to pay to the said inspector [or as the case may he] the sum of per week from the date of the said order until the day of , the same to be paid at the expira- tion of each [twenty-eight] days [<«• as the case may be] i*) : And whereas there is due upon the said order the sum of , being for [three] periods of [fourteen] days each, and default has been made therein for tlie space of fourteen days. These are therefore to command you, in Her Majesty's name, ' forthwith to make distress of the goods and chattels of the said C.B., and if within the space of [^ve] days next after the making of such distress the said last mentioned sum, together with the reasonable charges of taking and keeping the said distress, is not paid, that then you do sell the said goods and chattels so by yon distrained, and do pay the money arising from such sale to , the clerk of the justices of the peace for the of , that he may pay and apply the same as by law directed, and may render the overplus (if any), on demand to the said C.B. ; and if no such distress can be found, then that you certify the same to us, to the end that such proceedings may be had therein as the law requires. Given under our hands and seals, this day of , at , in the [county] aforesaid. J.S. (L.S ) L.M. (L.S.) (H.) Commitment in de/ault oJ" Distress. ■) To the constable of and to the keeper of to wit j the [pi-ison] at , in the said [county] of Whereas [dc, as in thejform (G.) to the single asterisJc (*), and then thiis] : And whereas afterwards, on the day of last, I, the undersigned, together with L.M., Esquire [or J.S. and L.M., Esquires], two of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the said [coujiiy] of issued a warrant to the constable of aforesaid, com- manding him to levy the sum of due upon the said recited order, being for [iAree] periods of [Jburteen] days, by 348 Befoiinatory Schools Act. distress and sale o{ the goods and chattels of the said C.B. : And whereas a return has this day been made to rae, the said justice [or the undersigned, one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the said [county] of ], that no sufficient ^oods of the said O.B. can be found : These are therefore to command you, the said constable of , to take the said C.B., and him safely to convey to the [prison] at aforesaid, and there deliver him to the keeper thereof, together with this precept : And I do hereby command you, the said keeper of the said [prison], to receive the said 'CD. into your custody in the said [pruon], there to imprison him for the term of , unless the said sum, and all costs and charges of the said distress, and of the commitment and conveying of the said 0,D. to the said [prison], amounting to the further sum of , shall be sooner paid unto you the said keeper ; and for your so doing this shall be your sufficient warrant. Given under my hand and seal this day of in the year of our Lord , at in the [county] aforesaid. J.S. (L.S.) (J.) Order on Parent in JScoiUmd, 4'c.,yor Contribution. The sheriff [or as the case may be] having considered the complaint of B.F., the inspector of reformatory schools, made under "The Eeformatory Schools Act, 1866," and having heard parties thereon [oi- in absence of CD., dedgn- ingUm, duly cited, but not appearing] pursuant to the said act, decerns CD. complained on, weekly and every week from the day of to pay to the said E.P., or to his agent from time to time authorised to receive the sam^, the sum of shillings for the support and maintenance of A.B., son [or as the case maybe] of the said CD., now detained in the certified reformatory school of under an order by of date until the said A.B., attains the age of years or is lawfully discharged from the said school, and grants warrant of arrestment to be executed by aijy constable or messenger at arms. Given under my hand this day of at in the county aforesaid. [Magistrate's signature.] 29 # 30 Viet. cap. 118. 349 INDUSTEIAL SCHOOLS ACT. (29 & 30 ViOT. CAP. 118.) An Act to consolidate and amend the Acts relating to Industrial Schools in Great Britain. — [10th August, 1866.] Be it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with, the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and tenxporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : Preliminary. 1. This act may be cited as "The Industrial Short title. Schools Act, 1866." 2. This act shall not extend to Lreland. Extent of act 3. The acts described in the first schedule to Acts de- this act are hereby repealed ; but this repeal shall flrsts'ohe- not affect the past operation of any such act, or ''"'^ ''^■ the force or operation of any certificate, order, ^^°' ° rule, or sentence made or passed, or the validity or invalidity of anything done or suffered, or any right, title, obhgation, or liability accrued, before the- passing of this act ; nor shall this act interfere with the institution or prosecution of any pro- ceeding in respect of any offence committed against, ctr any penalty or forfeiture incurred under, any act hereby repealed. 4. Ll this act — Interpre- The term " justice " applies to England only, *?"°° °' and means a justice of the peace having jurisdiction in the place where the matter requiring the cognizance of a justice arises : The term " two justices " applies to England only, and means two or more justices in petty sessions or the Lord Mayor or an alder- 350 Industrial Schools Act, man of the city of London, or a police or stipendiary magistrate or other justice having by law authority to act alone for any pur- pose with tTie powers of two justices. The term " magistrate " applies to Scotland only, and includes sheriff, sheriff substitute, justice of the peace of a county, judge in a police court, and provost or baillie of a city or burgh : The term "prison authority" with respect to England has the same meaning as in " The 38 & 29 Vict. Prisons Act, 1865," and with respect to '^ ^^*' Scotland means the administrators of a 23 & 24 Vict prison as defined by " The Prisons (Scotland) "■ ^°^ Administration Act, I860:" The term " parish " includes a place separately maintaining its own poor. Industrial Schools. Deeoi-iption 5. A school in which industrial training is sLooiraJTd provided, and in which children are lotted, managers, clothed, and fed, as well as taught, shall ex- clusively be deemed an industrial school within the meaning of this act. The persons for the time being having the management or control of such a school shall be deemed the managers thereof for the purposes of this act. Inspector. Inspector of 6. Such one of Her Majesty's inspectors of sohoois'lina prisons as one of Her Majesty's principal Secre- asBiatant taries of State (in this act referred to as the Secretary of State) from time to time thinks fit to appoint to be the inspector of reformatory schools shall be also the inspector of industrial schools. The Secretary of State may from time to time appoint a fit person to assist the inspector ; and every person so appointed shall have such of the 29 ^30 Vict. cap. 118. 351 powers and duties of the inspector of industrial schools as tte Secretary of State from time to time prescribes, but shall act under the direction of the inspector. Certified Industrial Schools. 7. The Secretary of State may, on the appli- Mode of cation of the managers of an industrial school, indnBtrilj ■ direct the inspector of industrial schools to ex- school amine into the condition of the school, and its fitness for the reception of children to be sent there under this act, and to report to him thereon, and the inspector shall examine and report ac- cordingly. If satisfied with the report of the inspector the Secretary of State may, by writing under his hand, certify that the school is fit for the recep- tion of children to be sent there under this act, and thereupon the school shall be deemed a certi- fied industrial school. 8. A school shall not be at the same time a School not certified industrial school under this act and a fled as to-" certified reformatory school under any other act. dustriai ar •' •' reformat 9. A notice' of the grant of each certificate '°'^- shall within one month be inserted by order of ^rttfioate i the Secretary of State in the London or in the ^^ gazettei Edinburgh Gazette, according as the school to which it refers is in England or in Scotland. A copy of the Gazette containing the notice Copy of shall be conclusive evidence of the grant, which be'^eTideno( may also be proved by the certificate itself, or by an instrument purporting to be a copy of the cer- tificate, and to be attested as such by the inspector of industrial schooLi. 10. Every certified industrial school shall from inspection time to time, and at least once in each year, be "' ^°'">'''' inspected by the inspector of industrial schools, or by a person appointed to assist him as afore- said. 352 Industrial Schools Act, Alterations, H. No Substantial addition or alteration shall iiigs to be lie made to or in the buildings of any certified approved, industrial school without the approval in writing of the Secretary of State. Contribu- 12. In England a prison authority mayirom comities and time to time contribute such sums of money, and ^°l°^f^i *° oil such conditions as they think fit, towards the ment and alteration, enlargement, or rebuilding of a certi- o?S"™* fis'l industrial school, — or towards the support of- the inmates of such a school, — or towards the management of such a school, — or towards the establishment or building of a school intended to be a certified industrial school, — or towards the purchase of land required either for the use of an existing certified industrial school, or for the site of a school intended to be a certified industrial school ; provided,— First, that not less than two months previous notice of the intention of the prison authority to take into consideration the making of sueh contribution, at a time and place to be mentioned in such notice, be given by advertisement in some one or more public newspaper or newspapers circulated within the district of the county or borough, and also in the manner in which notices relating to business to be transacted by the prison authority are usually given : Secondly, that where the prison authority is the council of a borough, the order for the contribution be made at a special meeting of the council : Thirdly, that where the contribution is for alteration, enlargement, rebuilding, establish- ment, or building of a school or intended school, or for purchase of land, the approval of the Secretary of State be previously given for thg,t alteration, enlargement, rebuilding, establishment, building, or purchase. 29 # 30 Vict. cap. 118. 353 In Scotland a county board may contribute to any certified industrial school with the consent and in the manner provided by " The Prisons (Scotland)' Administration Act, 1860," respecting contributions to reformatories. 13. In order to obtain . the approval of the Mode of Secretary of State as aforesaid where required, apprOTaf of the managers of the schoolj or promoters of Secretary oi the intended school, shall forward to the Secre- °''*' tary of State particulars of the proposed esta- blishment or purchase, and a plan of the proposed alteration, enlargement, rebuilding, or building, drawn on such scale, and a To a constable of the said county of to wit. j , and to the keeper of the house of coi-reotion at iu the said county of Whereas A.B. was on this day duly convicted before me the undersigned, one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the county of , having been brought before me by C.B., a constable, under the provisions of " The Habitual Criminals Act, 1869," and charged upon the oath of the said CD., taken before me in the presence and hearing of the said A.B., of being a rogue and vagabond within the intent and meaning of the statutes made in the fifth year of the reign of his late Majesty King George the Fourth, intituled "An Act for the Punishment of idle and disorderly Persons and Bogues and Vagabonds in that Part of Great Britain called England," and " The Habitual Criminals Act, 1869," before mentioned, (that is to say,) for that the said A.B. on the day of in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and , in the parish of , in the said county of , [here set out the circumstances under which the Justice was of opinion tliat the said A.B. nnght reasonably be susipected to have in- tended tQ- commit a Jelomf], contrary to the said statutes. And it was thereby adjudged that the said A.B. for the said offence should be imprisoned at the house of correction at , in the said county, and there kept to hard labour for the space of These are therefore to command you the said constable to take the said A.B., and him safely to convey to the house of correction aforesaid, and there to deliver him to the keeper thereof, together with this precept : and I do command you, the said keeper of the said house of correction, to receive the said A.B. into your custody in the said house gf correction, there to imprison him and keep him to iard labour for the space of Given under my hand and seal at this day of in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 23. 433 FOEFEITUEES FOE TREASON AND FELONY ABOLITION ACT. (33 & 34 Vict. cap. 23.) An Act to abolish Forfeitures for Treason and Felony, and to otherwise amend the Law relating thereto. — [Ath July, 1870.] Wheeeas it is expedient to abolish the for- feiture of lands and goods for treason and felony, and to otherwise amend the law relating thereto : Be it enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows ; (that is to say,) 1. From and after the passing of this act no Forfeiture, confession, verdict, inquest, conviction, or judg- naiiea.''" ment of or for any treason or felony or felo de se shall cause any attainder or corruption of blood, or any forfeiture or escheat, provided that nothing in this act shall affect the law of forfeiture con- sequent upon outlawry. 2. Provided nevertheless, that if any person Conviction hereafter convicted of treason or felony, for which o?'felony°to he shall be sentenced to death, or penal servitude, ^^ ^ aisqua- . c ■ . i -ii 1 1 1 1 liflcation for or any term or imprisonment vfith hard labour, offloea, ftc. or exceeding twelve months, shall at the time of such conviction hold any military or naval office, or any civil office under the Crown or other public emplojrment, or any ecclesiastical 'benefice, or any place, office, or emolument in any university, college, or other corporation, or be entitled to any pension or superannuation allowance payable by the public, or out of any public fund, such office, benefice, employment, or place shall forthwith become vacant, and such pension or superannua- tion allowance or emolument shall forthwith determine and cease to be payable, unless such V 434 Forfeitures for Treason, 4'C- Abolition Act, person shall receive a free pardon from Her Majesty, within two months after such convic- tion, or before the filling up of such ofBce, bene- fice, employment, or place if given at a later period ; and such person shall become, and (un- til he shall have suffered the punishment to which he had been sentenced, or such other punishment as by competent authority may be substituted for the same, or shall receive a free pardon from Her Majesty), shall continue thence- forth incapable of holding any military or naval office, or any civil office under the Crown or other public employment, or any ecclesiastical benefice, or of being elected, or sitting, or voting as a member of either House of Parliament, or of exercising any right of suffrage or other parlia- mentary or municipal franchise whatever within England, Wales, or Ireland. Persons con- 3. It shall be lawful for any court, (') by which treason or judgment shall be pronounced or recorded, upon felony may the conviction of any person for treason or felony, demned in "in addition to such sentence as may otherwise by law be passed, (^) to condemn such person to the payment of the whole or any part of the costs or expenses incurred in and about the prosecution and conviction for the offence of which he shall be convicted, if to such court it shall seem fit so to do ; (^) and the payment of such costs and (>) " Any court competent to determine a charge of felony ;" and it therefore extends to the summary juris- diction of justices in cases of larceny and embezzlement. (2) It would appear from this that the order must be made at the time of the conviction, and as an addition to the sentence, and the following form is suggested : " And I further condemn you to pay (the costs) or (the expenses) or (one half) (or as the case may be) (of the costs) (or of the expenses) incurred in and about the prosecution and conviction for the offence of which you are now con- victed." (3) It should be observed that the condemnation is to be for costs or expenses, and therefore both cannot be costs. 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 23. 435 expenses, or any part thereof, may be ordered by the court to be made out of any moneys (■*) taken from suob person on his apprehension, (*) or may be enforced at the instance of amy person liable to pay, or who may have paid the same, in such and the same manner (subject to the provisions of this act) as the payment of any costs ordered to be paid by the judgment or order of any court of competent jurisdiction in any civil action or proceeding may for the time being be enforced : Provided, that in the meantime and until the recovery of such costs and expenses from the person so convicted as aforesaid, or from his estate, the same shall be paid and provided for in the same manner as if this act had not passed ; and any money which may be recovered in respect thereof from the person so convicted, or from his estate, shall be applicable to the reimbursement included. " Costs " will probably be construed as mean- ing the " legal " costs of the prosecution — " expenses " the other costs, extra the legal costs so incurred. The words "in and about" give wide latitude for such an order; and as it may be held to include expenses incurred in the inquiries preliminary to the appearance of the prisoner before the justices, the power thus lodged in the court may be often exercised with great advantage to remune- rate for extraordinary exertions and expenditure in the tracing of crime and capturing the criminal, for which the law has hitherto made no provision. ^') " Moneys " will include all coin and bank notes that are legal tender. But will the term include bank notes not legal tender, foreign bank notes, cheques, and such like ? It will not include bills of exchange, promissory notes and warrants or orders for the payment of money. (*) This power is limited to moneys taken from the prisoner on his apprehension. If read strictly, this would apply only to moneys in the manual possession of the prisoner. The question will speedily occur, if this useful provision extends to constructive possession, as where the prisoner has purposely passed away his money to his wife, to a servant, or to a comrade, ftloneys found in his house in his absence would not be within the provision ; but how if he were present at the time of the taking.; would not the seizing of them then be a taking from him within both the spirit and the letter of the statute. U 2 436 Forfeitures for Treason, #c. Abolition Act, of any person or fund by whom or out of whicb sucli costs and expenses may have been paid or defrayed. Compensi- 4. It shall be lawful for any such court as pe^nf aforesaid, (6) if it shall think fit, upon the appli- defraudedor cation of any person aggrieved, and immediately felmy^''^ after the conviction of any person for felony, O to award any sum of money, not exceeding one hundred pounds, by way of satisfaction or com- pensation for any loss of property suffered by the applicant through or by means of the said felony, (*) and the amount awarded for such satis- (') Great caution should be used in the exercise of the power given by this section. It is liable to be abused by private arrangements between the prosecutor and the prisoner, by which, in consideration of an order for com- pensation, there shall he recommendations to mercy, or suggestions for nominal punishment. This would operate practically as a condonation of felony. The compensa- tion is not designed to be a part of the punishment, still less to be given in lieu of punishment. It is designed only to enable the court to add to the penalty for the crime which the wrong to the public demands, the com- pensation for the wrong to the individual which justice requires, but for which hitherto our law has provided no summary remedy. (') It will be observed that compensation must be awarded at the time of the trial, and immediately after the conviction, and although not so expressed, as in the case ot costs or expenses, to be " in addition to such sentence as may otherwise by law be passed," neverthe- less, inasmuch as it is to be awarded Immediately after conviction and must be recorded, it should be an addition to the sentence. (*) The assertion " through or by means of the said felony " admits of great latitude in its application. It appears that the judge or justice has an absolute dis- cretion as to the sum to be awarded, and he may accept any statement he pleases made in any manner. But the pru- dent and proper course will be to take the statement of the applicant and others upon oath with some cross- examination of assertions as to alleged losses, to be assured, not only that the loss has been suffered, but, in the words of the statute, that it was "through or by means of the felony of which the prisoner has just been 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 23. 437 faction or compensation shall be deemed a judg- ment debt due to the person entitled to receive the same from the person so convicted, and the order for payment of such amount may be en- forced in such and the same manner as in the case of any costs ordered by the court to be paid under the last preceding section of this act. (^) 5. The word "forfeiture," in the construction The word of this act, shall not include any fine or penalty defined"™ " imposed on any convict by virtue of his sentence. 6. The expression "convict," as hereinafter The word used, shall be deemed to mean any person against defined whom, after the passing of this act, judgment of death, or of penal servitude, shall have been pro- nounced or recorded by any court of competent jurisdiction ia England, Wales, or Ireland upon any charge of treason or felony. ('") 7. When any convict shall die or be made When eon- bankrupt, or shall have suffered any punishment cease to be to which sentence of death if pronounced or ™''^® ^ '° f recorded against him may be lawfully commuted, the act. or shall have undergone the full term of penal servitude for which judgment shall have been convicted." When the provision comes to be generally known, these applications will be frequent, and much ingenuity will be exercised in the concoction of ques- tionable claims. Unless other evidence of ,lo8s is perfectly satisfactory, the most prudent course will be to limit the orders to compensation for losses that are proved in the course of the trial. (») The remedy here is cumulative. In addition to the same remedies as are given in the case of costs, an order for compensation is to operate as a judgment debt. But it may also be ordered to be paid from the moneys taken from the prisoner on his apprehension. ('I") The following provisions of the statute relate only to the property of "a convict," who is defined to be a person against whom a judgment of death or of penal servitude have been passed on a charge of treason or felony. They do not apply to misdemeanants, nor where the sentence ie for imprisonment only. 438 Forfeitures for Treason, ^c. Abolition Act, pronounced or recorded against tim, or sucli other punisliment as may by competent authority have been substituted for such full term, or shall have received Her Majesty's pardon for the treason or felony of which he may have been convicted, he shall thenceforth, so far as relates to the pro- visions hereinafter contained, cease to be subject to the operation of this act. Convict dis- 8. No action at law or suit in equity for the foTOT to™* recovery of any property, debt, or damage what- aiienate soever shall be brought by any convict against proper y, c. ^^^ person during the time while he shall be subject to the operation of this act ; and every convict shall be incapable, during such time as aforesaid, of alienating or charging any property, or of making any contract, save as hereinafter provided. The Crown 9. It shall be lawful for Her Majesty, or for SSi^'any person in that behalf authorised by Her tors of any Majesty, under her royal sign manual (and which convict's ,■! ■;, i • -S. ii -ii. property. authority may be given either generally or witn reference to any particular case), if to Her Majesty or to the person so authorised it shall seem fit, by writing under Her Majesty's royal sign manual, or under the hand of the person so authorised as aforesaid, to commit the custody and manage- ment of the property of any convict, during Her Majesty's pleasure, to an administrator, to be by such writing appointed in that behalf, (") and every such appointment may be revoked by the same or the like authority by which it is made ; and upon any determination thereof, either by revocation or by the death of any such adminis- trator, a new administrator may be appointed by (") This formidable oflaoer, to be appointed under the sign manual of the sovereign, is not likely to be called in save in the rare cases of the convict being a very wealthy man. For all ordinary persons a curator will, doubtless, be preferred ; for which, see sect. 21. 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 23. 439 the same or tlie like authority from time to time ; and every such new administrator shall, upon his appointment, be and be deemed to be the suc- cessor-in-law of the former administrator ; and all property vested in, and all powers given to, such former administrator by virtue of this act shall thereupon devolve to and become vested in such successor, who shall be bound by all acts lawfully done by such former administrator during the continuance of his office ; and the provisions here- inafter contained with reference to any adminis- trator shall, in the case of the appointment of more than one person, apply to such adminis- trators jointly. 10. Upon the appointment of any such ad- Convict's ministrator in manner aforesaid all the real and TOsftnad-" personal property, including choses in actions, to mtajstrators which the convict named in such appointment pointment. was at the time of his conviction, or shall after- wards while he shall continue subject to the operations of this act, become or be entitled, shall vest in such administrator for all the estate and interest of such convict therein. 11. If, in the instrument by which any such Remimera- administrator is appointed, ' provision shall be Sstmtore""" made for the remuneration of such administrator out of the property of the convict, the said ad- ministrator may receive and retain for his own benefit such remuneration accordingly. 12. The administrator shall have absolute Administra- , T , , n J J. r tore to have power to let, mortgage, sell, convey, and transfer adminietra- any part of such property as to him shall seem fit. pe^aSJw 13. It shaU be lawful for the administrator to o^^ete." °' pay or cause to be paid out of such property, or Admmistra- the proceeds thereof, all costs and expenses which tor to pay ,^ ., 11 nii ontofpro- the convict may have been condemned to pay ; perty costs and also all costs, charges, and expenses incurred ^oJ™^™" by such convict in and about his defence ; and costs of exe. also all such costs, charges, and expenses as the ^t, * 440 Forfeitures for Treason, ^c. Abolition Act, said administrator may incur or be put to m or about the carrying this act into execution witli reference to sucli property, or with reference to any claims whiph may be made thereon. AdminiBtra- 14. The administrator may cause payment or out S^rH satisfaction to be made out of such property of perty debts any debt or liability of such convict which may be of convict'^ established in due course of law, or may other- wise be proved to his satisfaction, and may also cause any property which may come to his hands to be delivered to any person claiming to be justly entitled thereto, upon the right of such person being established in due course of law, or otherwise to his satisfaction. AdminiBtra- 15. The administrator may cause to be paid or makroom- Satisfied out of such property such sum of money pensations by way of satisfaction or compensation for any loss perty to™' of property or other injury alleged to have been d°r™d db suffered by any person through or by means of any criminal acts alleged criminal or fraudulent act of such convict, of convict gg ^Q ^^ shall seem just, although no proof of such alleged criminal or fraudulent act may have been made in any court of law or equity ; and all claims to any such satisfaction or compensation may be investigated in such manner as the adminis- trator shall think fit, and the decision of the administrator thereon shall be binding : Provided always, that nothing in this act shall take away or prejudice any right, title, or remedy to which any person alleging himself to have suffered any such loss or injury would have been entitled by law if this act had not passed. AdminiBtra- 16. The administrator may cause such payments tor may ^nd allowances for the support or maintenance of anceB out of any wife or child, or reputed child of such convict, sipporuif"' 0=^ of ^^y 0*^^^ relative or reputed relative of such family of convict dependent upon him for support, or for the convict. benefit of the convict himself, if and while he shall be lawfully at large under any licence, as to such 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 23. 441 administrator shall seem fit, to be made from time to time out of such property, or the income thereof. 17. The several powers hereinbefore given to Exercise of the said administrator, or any of them, may be "•'imtoistra- exercised by him in such order and course, as to aBtoprioritj priority of payments or otherwise, as he shall plyStTbj thing fit ; and all contracts of letting or sale, admims- f I J- iP , tra'or for mortgages, conveyances, or transfers ot property, purposes of bond fide made by the said administrator under ^l^^fi^ "^ the powers of this act, and all payments or delive- question, ries over of property bond fide made by or under the authority of the said administrator for any of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned, shall be binding ; and the propriety thereof, and the suffi- ciency of the grounds on which the said adminis- trator may have exercised his j udgment or discretion in respect thereof, shall not be in any manner called in question by such convict, or by any person claiming an interest in such property by virtue of this act. 18. Subject to the powers and provisions here- Property to inbefore contained, all such property and the fo^rMnvi™" income thereof shall be preserved and held in trust ana to revert by the said administrator, and the income thereof represcma-' may, if and when the said administrator shall *'™^ ™. think proper, be invested and accumulated in such of sentence, securities as he shall from time to time think fit, death."' ""^ for the use and benefit of the said convict and his heirs, or legal personal representatives, or of such other persons as may be lawfully entitled thereto, according to the nature thereof ; and the same, and the possession, administration, and manage- ment thereof, shall re-vest in and be restored to such convict upon his ceasing to be subject to the operation of this act, or in and to his heirs or legal personal representatives, or such other persons as may be lawfully entitled thereto ; and all the powers and authorities by this act given to the said administrator shall from thenceforth cease V 3 442 Forfeitures for Treason, ^c. Abolition Act, and determine, except so far as tlie continuance ttereof may be necessary for the care and preser- vation of such property or any part thereof, imtil the same shall be claimed by some person lawfully entitled thereto, or for obtaiaing payment out of such property, or of the proceeds thereof, of any liabilities, or any costs, charges, or expenses, for which proyision is made by this act ; for which purposes such powers and authorities shall con- tinue to be in force untU possession of such pro- perty shall be delivered up by the said adminis- trator to some person being or claiming to be lawfully entitled thereto. Administra- 19. The said administrator shall not be answer- beliabie ° able to any person for any property which shall wSthey '^°* actually have come to his hands by virtue of receive this act, nor for any loss or damage which may happen through any mere omission or nonfeasance on his part to any property vested in him by virtue hereof. Administra- 20. The costs as between solicitor and client of ooBtsorBuite every action or suit which may be brought against of property ^jj^g said administrator with reference to any such solicitor and property as aforesaid, whether during the time client while the same shall be and continue vested in him under this act or after the same shall cease to be so vested, and aU charges and expenses pro- perly incurred by him with reference thereto, shall be a first charge upon and shall be paid out of such property, unless the court before which such action is tried or such suit is heard shall think fit otherwise to order. ifnoadmi- 21. If no such administrator as aforesaid shall fnSm"^' liave been appointed an interim curator (^ 2) of the be'a'^'loted V^^^'^^J ^^ ^'^7 convict may be appointed by any by justice?. (12) Although called an interim curator, he is in fact in- vested with the same po-wers as an adtninistrator imder sect. 9, and, therefore, will doubtless be generally preferred. 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 28. 443 justices of the peace in petty sessions assembled, or, where there are no petty sessions, by any justice of the peace having jurisdiction in the place where such convict before his conviction shall have last usually resided, upon the application of any person who shall be able to satisfy such justice that the application is made bond fide with a view to the benefit of the convict or of his family, or to the due and proper administration and management of his property and affairs ; and the interim curator to be appointed may be either the person making the application or any other person willing to accept the office, and competent to dis- charge its duties, as to such justice shall seem fit. 22. Before maJdng any such appointment the ProceedingB justice shall require the applicant to make oath josaces. that no administrator or interim curator of the property of such convict hats been to his know- ledge or belief already appointed ; and the appli- cant shall also state upon oath, to the best of his knowledge and belief, who are the nearest rela- tives (including any husband or wife) of such convict, and (if any such there be) where they are residing, and whether any and which of them have consented to or have had notice of such application ; and it shall be competent for such justice to require notice of such apphcation to be given to all such persons and in such manner as to such justice shall seem fit. 23. Any interim curator so appointed may be Removal of removed, for any cause shown to the satisfaction ourator for of the justices or justice or the court, upon the "^se application of any relative of the convict, or of any person interested in the due and proper adininistration and management of his property and affairs, either by the petty sessions or justice by whom he was appointed (or, in the event of such justice dying or being unable to act, by any other justice having the like jurisdiction) or by 444 Forfeitures for Treason, ^c. Abolition Act, any court in -wHoli proceedings for an account may be instituted as hereinafter provided; and upon the death or renaoval of any such interim curator a new interim curator may be appointed in the same manner and by the like authority as aforesaid, or (in case any such proceedings shall be then depending) by the court in which any such proceedings shall be so depending as afore- said. Powers of 24. Every interim curator so appointed as interim aforesaid shall have power funless and until /inT*fl|tor an administrator shall be appointed under this act, in which case the authority of such interim curator shall thenceforth cease and determine) to sue in his own name as such interim curator, at law or in equity, for the possession and recovery of any part of the property in respect of which he shall have been so appointed, or for damages in respect of any injury thereto, and to defend in his own name as such interim curator any action or suit brought against such convict or against him- self in respect of such property, and to receive and give legal discharges for all rents, dividends, , interest, and income of or arising from such pro- perty, and also to receive and give discharges for any debts due to such convict, or forming part of his property, and to pay and discharge all or any debts due from such convict out of such property, and to settle and adjust accounts with any debtor or creditor of such convict, and generally to manage and administer the property of such con- vict ; and also to make or cause to be made such pa3rm.ents and allowances for the support or main- tenance of any wife or child of such convict, or of any other relative dependent on him for support, as shall be specially authorized by any such justice or court aforesaid (who shall have power from time to time to authorize the same), or by any other court having competent jurisdiction to 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 28. 445 authorize tlie same, out of the income of auch property, or (in case such income shall be insuffi- cient for that purpose) out of the capital thereof ; and every such interim curator shall be entitled to retain out of such property, or out of the income thereof, all his costs, charges, and expenses properly incurred in and about the discharge of his duties as such curator. 25. Any personal property of such convict may Personal be sold and transferred by such interim curator ^"'jl^-^g'^goid by and with the authority of such justice or court by interim as aforesaid, or of any other court having compe- nn^" tent jurisdiction to order the same, but not other- specif order wise ; and such interim curator shall be account- court able for the proceeds of any property so sold in the same manner as for such property while remaining unsold. 26. All proceedings at law or in equity duly proceedings instituted by or against any such interim curator byor against may (in case of an administrator or a new interim curator not curator being afterwards appointed) be continued ^mtais-'' by or against such administrator or such new trator is interim curator without any abatement thereof, °'''P°'°* the appointment of such administrator or new interim curator being entered by way of sugges- tion on the record, or otherwise stated upon the proceedings, according to the practice of such court ; and all acts lawfully done and contracts lawfully made by such interim curator with respect to any property of such convict before the appointment of such administrator or such new interim curator shall be binding upon such ad- ministrator or such new interim curator after his appointment. 27. All judgments or orders for the pajrment Execution of of money of any court of law or equity against indgnientB such convict which shall have been duly recovered Tict pro- or made, either before or after his conviction, may ^"^°'* '"'■ be executed against any property of such convict 446 Forfeitures for Treason, SfC. Abolition Act, under the care and management of any such interim curator as aforesaid, or in tiie hands of any person who may have taken upon himself the possession or management thereof without legal authority, in the same manner as if such pro- perty were in the possession or power of such convict; and all such judgments or orders may likewise be executed by writ of scire facias or otherwise, according to the practice of the court, against any such property which may be vested in any administrator of 'the property of such convict under the authority of this act. Prooeedings 28. It shall be competent for Her Majesty's ™k^ ''to Attomey-Q-eneral, or other the chief law officer make adrni- of the crown for the time being in any part of Sterta"^ "^ Her Majesty's dominions, or for any person who curator, &c. (^jf gw^ convict were dead intestate) would be his before pro- heir at law, or entitled to his personal estate, or to TOn"™t^ a^y stare thereof, under the Statutes of Distri- tribution or otherwise, or for any person autho- rised by Her Majesty's Attorney-General, or by such chief law ofBcer as aforesaid, in that behalf, to apply in a summary way to any court which (if such convict were dead) would have jurisdiction to entertain a suit for the administration of his real or personal estate, to issue a writ of sum- mons calling upon any administrator or interim curator of the property of such convict appointed under this act, or any person who without legal authority shall have possessed himself of any part of the property of such convict, to account for his receipts and pajrments in respect of the property of such convict, in such manner as such court shall direct ; and it shall be lawful for such court thereupon to issue such writ of summons, and to enforce obedience thereto, and to all orders and proceedings of such court consequent thereon, in the same manner as in any other case of pro- cess lawfully issuing out of such court ; and such 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 23. 447 court stall thereupon have full power, juriBdiction> and authority to take all such accounts, and to make and give all such orders and directions as to it shall seem proper or necessary for the purpose of securing the due and proper care, adminis- tration, and management of the property of such convict, and the due and proper application of the same, and of the income thereof, and the accumu- lation and investment of such balances, if any, as may from time to time remain in the hands of any such administratsr or interim curator, or other person as aforesaid in respect of such pro- perty ; and so long as any such proceediags shall be pending in any such court, every such adminis- trator or interim curator, or other person, shall act in the exercise of all powers vested in him under this act, or otherwise in all respects as such court shall direct ; and it shall be lawful for such court (if it shall think fit) to authorise and direct any act to be done by any such interim curator which might competently be done by an administrator duly appointed under this act. 29. Subject to the provisions of this act, every Adminis- such administrator, interim curator, and other per- ^^' '^' ■ son as aforesaid shall, from and after the time acoonntaUe when such convict shall cease to be subject to the when pro- operation of this act, be accountable to such con- p^J^ ™' vict for all property of such convict which shall have been by him possessed or received and not duly administered, in the same manner in which any guardian or trustee is now accountable to his ward or cestui que trust; but subject nevertheless and without prejudice to the adioinistration and application of such property under and according to the powers of this act. 30. Provided always, that no property ac- ^"PfJ/^^f quired by a convict during the time which he qniredwhiie BhaU be lawfully at large under any licence shall S^^j'^^^t^J, vest in any administrator appointed under this beBubjeotto ■448 Evidence Amendment Act, the operas act, but sucli oonvict stall be entitled thereto Hon of this ^tjjo,jj. j^^y interference on tbe part of any administrator or interim curator appointed under tbis act, and during the time last aforesaid the •disabilities mentioned in the eighth section of this act shall, as to such convict, be suspended. Judgment 31. From and after the passing of this act SghTlason such portions of the acts of the thirtieth year of George the Third, chapter forty-eight, and the fifty-fourth year of George the Third, chapter one hundred and forty-six, as enacts that the judgment required by law to be awarded against persons adjudged guilty of high treason shall include the drawing of the person on a hurdle to the place of execution, and, after execution, the severing of the head from the body, and the dividing of the body into four quarters, shall be and are hereby re- pealed. Saving of 32. Provided always, that nothing in this act a8°to™eiony. Shall be deemed to alter or in anywise affect the law relating to felony in England, Wales, or Ire- land, except as herein is expressly enacted. Extent of 33. This act shall not apply to Scotland, act -^^ •' EVIDENCE AMENDMENT ACT. (33 & 34 Vict. cap. 49.) An Act to explain and am^nd " The Evidence Further Amemdm^nt Act, 1869." — \^th August 1870.] Wheeeas it was enacted by the "Evidence Further Amendment Act, 1869," sect. 4, as follows : " If any person called to give evidence in any court of justice, whether in a civil or a criminal 33 # 34 Vict. cap. 49. 449 proceeding, shall object to take an oath, or shall be objected to as incompetent to take an oath, such person shall, if the presiding judge is satis- fied that the taking of an oath would have no binding effect on his conscience, make the follow- ing promise and declaration : " ' I solemnly promise and declare, that the evi- dence given by me to the court shaU be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.' " And any person who, having made such pro- mise and declaration, shall wilfully and corruptly give false evidence, shall be liable to be indicted, tried, and convicted for perjury as if he had taken an oath : " And whereas doubts have arisen as to the ex- tent and meaning of the words " court of justice " and "presiding judge " in the said section : Be it enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : 1. The words "court of justice,'' and the words interpreta- " presiding judge," in sect. 4 of the said Evidence "court of Further Amendment Act, 1869, shall be deemed jastioB" ana to include any person or persons having by law judge "in re- authority to administer an oath for the taking '"'^'* *"'• of evidence. 2. This act may be cited for all purposes as Shon title. "The Evidence Amendment Act, 1870." 3. This act shall not extend to Scotland. Not to ex- tend to Scot- land. 450 The Extradition Act, THE EXTEADITION ACT. (33 & 34 VioT. CAP. 52.) An Act for amsnding the Law relating to the Extradition of Criminals. — \2th August, 1870.] Wheebas it is expedient to amend the law re- lating to ttie surrender to foreign states of persons accused or convicted of the commission of certain crimes within the jurisdiction of such states, and to the trial of criminals surrendered by foreign states to this country : Be it enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords spiritual and temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : Freliminary. Short title. 1. This act may be cited as "The Extradition Act, 1870." Where ar- 2. Where an arrangement has been made with for ^siOTOT- any foreign state with respect to the surrender to der of orimi- gueii state of any fugitive criminals. Her Majesty Order in ' may, by Order in Council, direct that this act counoii to gliall apply in the case of such foreign state. Her Majesty may, by the same or any subse- quent order, limit the operation of the order, and restrict the same to fugitive criminals who are in or suspected of being in the part of Her Majesty's dominions specified in the order, and render the operation thereof subject to such conditions, ex- ceptions, and qualifications as may be deemed expedient. Every such order shall recite or embody the terms of the arrangement, and shall not remain in force for any longer period than the arrange- ment. Every such order shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament within six weeks after it is 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 52. 451 made, or, if Parliament be not then sitting, within six weeks after the then next meeting of Parlia- ment, and shall also be published in the London Gazette. 3. The following restrictions shall be observed EeBtriotions with respect to the surrender of fugitive cri- o?orim1nafs! minals : (1.) A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered if the offence in respect of which his sur- render is demanded is one of a political character, or if he prove to the satisfaction of the police magistrate or the court be- fore whom he is brought on haheas cor- pus, or to the Secretary of State, that the requisition for his surrender has ia fact been made with a view to try or punish him for an offence of a political character : (2.) A fugitive criminal shall not be surren- dered to a foreign state unless provision is made by the law of that state, or by arrangement, that the fugitive criminal shall not, until he has been restored or had an opportunity of returning to Her Majesty's dominions, be detained or tried in, that foreign state for any offence com- mitted prior to his surrender other than the extradition crime proved by the facts on which the surrender is grounded : (3.) A fugitive criminal who has been accused of some offence within English jurisdic- tion not being the offence for which his surrender is asked, or is undergoing sen- tence under any conviction in the United Kingdom, shall not be surrendered until after he has been discharged, whether by acquittal or on expiration of his sentence or otherwise : (4.) A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered until the expiration of fifteen days from 452 The Extradition Act, the date of his being committed to prison to await his surrender. ProvisionBot 4. An Order in Council for applying this act in mintte tlie case of any foreign state shall not be made surrender, unless the arrangement — (1.) provides for the determination of it by either party to it after the expiration of a notice not exceeding one year ; and, (2.) is in conformity with the provisions of this act, and in particular with the restrictions on the surrender of fugitive criminals contained in this act. Publication 5. When an order applying this act in the case OTder"^"' "' °^ ^'ly foreign state has been published in the London Gazette, this act (after the date specified in the order, or if no date is specified, after the date of the publication,) shall, so long as the order remains in force, but subject to the limita- tions, restrictions, conditions, exceptions, and qualifications, if any, contained in the order, apply in the case of such foreign state. An Order in Council shall be conclusive evidence that the arrangement therein referred to complies with the requisitions of this act, and that this act applies in the case of the foreign state mentioned in the order, and the validity of such order shall not be questioned in any legal proceedings whatever. LiabUity of 6. Where this act applies in the case of any sumnder." foreign state, every fugitive criminal of that state who is in or suspected of being in any part of Her Majesty's dominions, or that part which is speci- fied in the order applying this act (as the case may be), shall be liable to be apprehended and surren- dered in manner provided by this act, whether the crime in respect of which the surrender is sought was committed before or after the date of the order, and whether there is or is not any concur- rent jurisdiction in any court of Her Majesty's dominions over that crime. 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 52. 453 7. A requisition for the surrender of a fugitive Order of Sec- criminal of any foreign state, who is in or sus- ™tat7for pected of being in the United Kingdom, shall be issue ot war- made to a Secretary of State by some person re- united cognised by the Secretary of State as a diplomatic ^^^^i™not representative of that foreign state. A Secretary of a political of State may, by order under his hand and seal, " '"'*°'*'"- signify to a police magistrate that such requisition has been made, and require him to issue his war- rant for the apprehension of the fugitive criminal. If the Secretary of State is of opinion that the offence is one of a political character, he may, if he think fit, refuse to send any such order, and may also at any time order a fugitive criminal accused or convicted of such offence to be dis- charged from custody. 8. A warrant for the apprehension of a fugitive issue of war- criminal, whether accused or convicted of crime, pouee ma- who is in or suspected of being in the United ^strate. jus- Kingdom, may be issued — *"'°' "' (1.) by a police magistrate on the receipt of the said order of the Secretary of State, and on such evidence as would in his opinion justify the issue of the warrant if the crime had been committed or the criminal convicted in England ; and (2.) by a police magistrate or any justice of the peace in any part of the United Kingdom, on such information or complaint and such evidence or after such proceedings as would in the opinion of the person issuing the warrant justify the issue of a warrant if the crime had been committed or the criminal convicted in that part of the United Kingdom in which he exercises jurisdiction. Any person issuing a warrant under this section without an order from a Secretary of State shall forthwith send a report of the fact of such issue, together with the evidence and information or 454 The Extradition Act, complaint, or certified copies thereof, to a Secre- tary of State, wlio may if lie think fit order the warrant to be cancelled, and the person who has been apprehended on the warrant to be dis- charged. A fugitive criminal, when apprehended on a warrant issued without the order of a Secretary of State, shall be brought before some person having power to issue a warrant under this section, who shall by warrant order him to be brought and the prisoner shall accordingly be brought before a police magistrate. A fugitive criminal apprehended on a warrant issued without the order of a Secretary of State shall be discharged by the police magistrate, unless the police magistrate, within such reasonable time as, with reference to the circumstances of the case, he may fix, receives from a Secretary of State an order signifjring that a requisition has been made for the surrender of such criminal. Hearing of 9- When a fugitive criminal is brought before case and evi- the police magistrate, the police magistrate shall political oha- hear the case in the same manner, and have the crime "' same jurisdiction and powers, as near as may be, as if the prisoner were brought before him charged with an indictable offence committed in England. The police magistrate shall receive any evi- dence which may be tendered to show that the crime of which the prisoner is accused or alleged to have been convicted is an offence of a political character or is not an extradition crime. Committal 10- In the case of a fugitive criminal accused or di?<=ii^|e of an extradition crime, if the foreign warrant " ^™ ' authorising the arrest of such criminal is duly authenticated, and such evidence is produced as (subject to the provisions of this act) would, according to the law of England, justify the com- mittal for trial of the prisoner if the crime of which he is accused had been committed in 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 52. 455 England, the police magistrate shall coinmit him to prison, but otherwise shall order him to be discharged. In the case of a fugitive criminal alleged to have been convicted of an extradition crime, if such evidence is produced as (subject to the provisions of this act) would, according to the law of England, prove that the prisoner was convicted of such crime, the police magistrate shall commit him to prison, but otherwise shall order him to be dis- charged. If he commits such criminal to prison, he shall commit him to the Middlesex House of Detention, or to some other prison ia Middlesex, there to await the warrant of a Secretary of State for his surrender, and shall forthwith send to a Secre- tary of State a certificate] of the committal, and such report upon the case as he may think fit. 11. If the police magistrate commits a fugitive SnirenderDf criminal to prison, he shall inform such criminal foSig™ state that he will not be surrendered until after the *[ g™^^*"^ expiration of fifteen days, and that he has a right of State, to apply for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon the expiration of the said fifteen days, or, if a writ of habeas corpus is issued, after the deci- sion of the court upon the return to the writ, as the case may be, or after such further period as may be allowed in either case by a Secretary of State, it shall be lawful for a Secretary of State, by warrant under his hand and seal, to order the fugitive criminal (if not delivered on the decision of the court) to be surrendered to such person as may in his opinion be duly authorised to receive the fugitive criminal by the foreign state from which the requisition for the surrender proceeded, and such fugitive criminal shall be surrendered accordingly. It shall be lawful for any person to whom such warrant is directed and for the person so autho- 456 The Extradition Act, rised as aforesaid to receive, hold in custody, and convey witMn the jurisdiction of such, foreign state the criminal mentioned in the warrant ; and if the criminal,escapes out of any custody to which he may be delivered on or in pursuance of such warrant, it shall be lawful to retake him in the same manner as any person accused of any crime against the laws of that part of Her Majesty's dominions to which he escapes may be retaken upon an escape. Discharge of 12. If the fugitive criminal who has been com- prehendedif niitted to prison is not surrendered and conveyed "o*"™- .out of the United Kingdom within two months United after such committal, or, if a writ of habeas cofpus wiMn°two ^^ issued, after the decision of the court upon the months. return to the writ, it shall be lawful for any judge of one of Her Majesty's Superior Courts at West- minster, upon application made to him by or on behalf of the criminal, and upon proof that reason- able notice of the intention to make such applica- tion has been given to a Secretary of State, to order the criminal to be discharged out of custody, unless sufficient cause is shown to the contrary. Execution of 13. The warrant of the police magistrate issued pSice"' ° i^ pursuance of this act may be executed in any magistrate, part of the United Kingdom in the same manner as if the same had been originally issued or sub- sequently indorsed by a justice of the peace having jurisdiction in the place where the same is exe- cuted. Depositions 14. Depositions or statements on oath, taken d'encV;"'&7 ^° * foreign state, and copies of such original Vict i. 76. depositions or statements, and foreign certificates of or judicial documents stating the fact of con- viction, may, if duly authenticated, be received in evidence in proceedings under this act. Authentioa- 15. Foreign warrants and depositions or state- Stions imd"' ments on oath, and copies thereof, and certificates 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 52. 457 of or judicial documents stating the fact of a con- warrants. viotion, stall be deemed duly authenticated f or o'iIl" ^'°*' the purposes of this act if authenticated in manner provided for the time being by law or authenticated as foUoWs : (1.) If the warrant purports to be signed by a judge, magistrate, or oflScer of the foreign state where the same was issued ; (2.) If the depositions or statements or the copies thereof purport to be certified under the hand of a judge, magistrate, or ofiBoer of the foreign state where the same were taken to be the original depo- sitions or statements, or to be true copies thereof, as the case may require ; and (3.) If the certificate of or judicial document stating the fact of conviction purports to be certified by a judge, magistrate, or ofScer of the foreign state where the conviction took place ; and if in every case the warrants, depositions, state- ments, copies, certificates, and judicial documents (as the case may be) are authenticated by the oath of some witness or by being sealed with the official seal of the minister of justice, or some other minister of state : And all courts of justice, justices, and magistrates shall take judicial notice of such official seal, and shall admit the docu- ments so authenticated by it to be received in evidence without further proof. Crimes committed at Sea. 16. Where the crime in respect of which the JarisdioHon T - (..,. ' • 1 . ■ -li as to cnmes surrender of a fugitive criminal is sought was committed committed on board any vessel on the high seas ** ^^*- which comes into any port of the United King- dom, the following provisions shall have effect : 1. This act shall be construed as if any stipen- diary magistrate in England or Ireland, and any sheriff or sheriff substitute in Scotland, 458 The Extradition Act, were substituted for the police magistrate tliroughout this act, except the part rela- ting to the execution of the warrant of the police magistrate : 2. The criminal may be comnjitted to any prison to which the person committing him has power to commit persons accused of the ILke crime : 3. If the fugitive criminal is apprehended on a warrant issued without the order of a Se- cretary of State, he shall be brought before the stipendiary magistrate, sheriff, or sheriff substitute who issued the warrant, or who has jurisdiction in the port where the vessel lies, or in the place nearest to that port. Fugitive Criminals in British Possessions. P™o«8d™gs 17. This act, when applied by Order in Council, tive orimi- shall, unless it is otherwise provided by such British pos- °'der, extend to every British possession in the same manner as if throughout this act the British possession were substituted for the United King- dom or England, as the case may require, but with the following modifications ; namely, (1.) The requisition for the surrender of a fugi- tive criminal who i§ in or suspected of being in a British possession may be made to the governor of that British posses- sion by any person recognised by that governor as a consul general, consul, or vice-consul, or (if the fugitive criminal has escaped from a colony or dependency of the foreign state on behalf of which the requisition is made) as the governor of such colony or dependency : (2.) No warrant of a Secretary of State shall be required, and all powers vested in or acts authorised or required to be done under this act by the police magistrate a.fld the Secretary of State, or either of them, in 33 ^- 34 Vict. cap. 52. 459 relation to the surrender of a fugitive criminal, may be done by the governor of the British possession alone : (3.) Any prison in the British possession may be substituted for a prison in Middlesex : (4.) A judge of any court exercising in the British possession the like powers as the Court of Queen's Bench exercises in England may exercise the power of dis- charging a criminal when not conveyed within two months out of such British possession. 18. If by any law or ordinance, made before or Saving o' after the passing of this act by the Legislature of HsrpoL^i' any British possession, provision is made for carry- sioi^. ing into effect within such possession the surrender of fugitive criminals who are in or suspected of being in such British possession, Her Majesty may, by the Order in OouncU applying this act in the case of any foreign state, or by any subsequent order, either suspend the operation within any such British possession of this act, or of any part thereof, so far as it relates to such foreign state, and so long as such law or ordinance continues in force there, and no longer ; or direct that such law or ordinance, or any part thereof, shall have effect in such British possession, with or without modifications and alterations, as if it were part of this act. General Provisions. 19. Where, in pursuance of any arrangement Criminal with a foreign state, any person accused or con- bylorelgn ^ victed of any crime which, if committed in state not England, would be one of the crimes described previous in the first schedule to this act is surrendered by ""^^ that foreign state, such person shall not, until he has been restored or had an opportunity of rer turning to such foreign state, be triable or tried X 2 460 The Extradition Act, for any offence committed prior to the surrender in any part of Her Majesty's dominions other than such of the said crimes as may be proved by the facts on which the surrender is grounded. As to use of 20. The forms set forth in the second schedule secondsone- to tHs act, or forms as near thereto as circum- '*"'«■ stances admit, may be used in all matters to which such forms refer, and in the case of a British possession may be so used, mutatis mutandis, and when used shall be deemed to be valid and suffi- cient in law. Bevooation, 21. Her Majesty may, by Order in Council, in OounoiL revoke or alter, subject to the restrictions of thia act, any Order in OouncU. made in pursuance of this act, and all the provisions of this act with respect to the original order shall (so far as appli- cable) apply, mutatis mutandis, to any such new order. Application 22. This act (except so far as relates to the Channel execution of warrants in the Channel Islands) Islands and g]iall extend to the Channel Islands and Isle of Man in the same manner as if they were part of the United Kingdom ; and the royal courts of the Channel Islands are hereby respectively authorised and required to register this act. Saving for 23. Nothing in this act shall affect the lawful treaties. powers of Her Majesty or of the Governor General of India in Council to make treaties for the extradition of criminals with Indian native states, or with other Asiatic states conterminous with British India, or to carry into execution the pro- visions of any such treaties made either before or after the passing of this act. Power of 24. The testimony of any witness may be ob- to o"tai^'°'*° tained in relation to any criminal matter pending evidence in in any court or tribunal in a foreign state in like Kingdom, manner as it may be obtained in relation to any civil matter under the act of ^ the session of the 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 52. 461 nirieteenth and twentieth years of tlie reign of Her present Majesty, chapter one hundred and thirteen, intituled " An Act to provide for taking evidence in Her Majesty's dominions in relation to civil and commercial matters pending before foreign tribunals ;" and all the provisions of that act shall be construed as if the term civil matter included a criminal matter, and the term cause included a proceeding against a criminal : Provided that nothing in this section shall apply in the case of any criminal matter of a political character. 25. For the purposes of this act, every colony, Foreign dependency, and constituent part of a foreign state, °J*J? ""r and every vessel of that state, shall (except pendencies, where expressly mentioned as distinct in this act) be deemed to be within the jurisdiction of and to be part of such foreign state. 26. In this act, unless the context otherwise Definition ot requires,— '*™^- The term "British possession" means any "British colony, plantation, island, territory, or settle- P™«^^'o°=" ment within Her Majesty's dominions, and not within the United Kingdom, the Channel Islands, and Isle of Man ; and all colonies, plantations, islands, territories, and settle- ments under one legislature, as hereinafter defined, are deemed to be one British posses- sion : The term "legislature" means any person or"Legi8ia- persons who can exercise legislative authority '"™' ' in a British possession, and where there are local legislatures as well as a central legis- lature, means the central legislature only : The term "governor" means any person or "Gover- persons administering the government of a "'"'•" British possession, and includes the governor of any part of India : The term "extradition crime" means a crime "Extradi- tion crime:" 462 The Extfadiiion Act, "Conyic- tion :" " Fogitive criminal :" " Fugitive criminal of a foreign state :" " Secretary of State ;" " Police magistrate;' "Justice of the peace;" ' Warrant" wHcli, if committed in England or within English jurisdiction, would be one of the crimes described in the first schedule to this act : The terms "conviction" and "convicted" do not include or refer to a conviction which under foreign law is a conviction for con- tumacy, but the term "accused person" in- cludes a person so convicted for contumacy : The term " fugitive criminal" means any person accused or convicted of an extradition crime committed within the jurisdiction of any foreign state who is in or is suspected of being in some part of Her Majesty's dominions; and the term " fugitive criminal of a foreign state" means a fugitive criminal accused or convicted of an extradition crime committed within the jurisdiction of that state : The term " Secretary of State " means one of Her Majesty's principal Secretaries of State : The term "police magistrate" means a chief magistrate of the metropolitan police courts, or one of the other magistrates of the metro- politan police-court in Bow-street : The term "justice of the peace" includes in Scotland any sheriff, sheriff's substitute, or magistrate : The term "warrant," in the case of any foreign state> includes ainy judicial document autho- rising the arrest of a person accused or convicted of crime. Bepeal of acts in third sche- dule. Repeal of Acts. 27. The acts specified in the third schedtde to this act are hereby repealed as to the whole of Her Majesty's dominions ; and this act (with the exception of anything contained in it which is in- consistent with the treaties referred to in the acts so repealed) shall apply (as regards crimes com- mittal either before or after the passing of this 33 ^ 34 Vict, cap. 62. 463 act), in the case of tlie foreign states with which those treaties are made, in the same manner as if an Order in Council referring to such treaties had been made in pursuance of this act, and as if such order had directed that every law and ordinance which is in force in aay British possession with respect to such treaties should have effect as part of this act. Provided that if any proceedings for or in rela- tion to the surrender of a fugitive criminal have been commenced under the said acts previously to the repeal thereof, such proceedings may be com- pleted, and the fugitive surrendered, in the same manner as if this act had not passed.. SOHEDULES. PiEST Sohedui;k. List of Crimes. The following list of crimes is to be constrned according to the law existing in England, or in a British possession, (as the case may be,) at the date of the alleged crime, whether by common law or by statute made before or after the passing of this act : Murder, and attempt and conspiracy to murder, manslaughter. Oonnterieiting and altering money and uttering counterfeit or altered money. Forgery, counterfeiting, and altering, and uttering what is forged or counterieited or altered. Embezzlement and larceny. Obtaining money or goods by false pretences. Crimes by bankrupts against bankruptcy law. Fraud by a bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, or director, or member, or public officer of any company made criminal by any act for the time being in force. Bape. Abduction. Child stealing. Burglary and housebreaking. Arson. Eobbery with violence. Threats by letter or otherwise with intent to extort. Piracy by law of nations. Sinking or destroying a vessel at sea, or attempting or conspiring to do so. 464 The Extraditidn Act, Assaults on board a ship on the high seas with intent to destroy life or to do grievous bodily harm. Kevolt or conspiracy to revolt by two or more persons on board a ship on the high seas against the authority or the master. Second Schedhle. Form of Order of Secretary of State to the Police Magistrate. To the chief magistrate of the metropolitan police courts or other magistrate of the metropolitan police court in Bow-street [or the stipendiary magistrate at ]. Whereas, in pursuance of an arrangement with _ , referred to in an Order of Her Majesty in Council dated the day of , a requisition has been made to me, , one of Her Majesty's principal Secretaries of State, by , the diplomatic representative of , for the surrender of , late of , accused [or convicted] of the commission of the crime of within the jurisdiction of : Now I hereby, by this my order under my hand and seal, signify to you that such requisition has been made, and require you to issue your warrant for the apprehension of such fugitive, pi'o- vided that the conditions of the Extradition Act, 1870, relating to the issue of such warrant, are in your judgment complied with. Given under the hand and seal of the undersigned, one of Her Majesty's principnl Secretaries of State, this day of 18 . Form of Warrant of Apprehension hy Order of Secretary of State. Metropolitan police ("To all and each of the constables of the district, [or county or) metropolitan police force [or of the borough of ] to wit (. county or borough of ]. Whereas the Eight Honourable one of Her Majesty's principal Secretaries of State, by order under bis hand and seal, hath signified to me that requisition hath been duly made to him for the surrender of late of accused [or convicted! of the commission of the crime of within the juris(uction of r This is therefore to command you in Her Majesty's name forthwith to apprehend the said pursuant to the Extradition Act, 1870, wherever he may be found in the United King- dom or Isle of Man, and bring him before me or some other [•magistrate sitting in this court], to show cause why he should not be surrendered in pursuance of the said Extra- dition Act, for which this shall be your warrant. Given under my hand and seal at [•Bow-street, one of the police courts of the metropolis] this day of 18 . J. P. • Note. — Alter as required. 33 ^ 34 Vict. cap. 52. 4B5 Farm of Warrant of Apprthetaion without Order of /Secretary of State. Metropolitan police ( To all and each of the constables of the diBtrict, [or county or ' metropolitan police force [or of the borough of ] to wit ( county or boroUgh of ]. Whereas it has been shown to the undersigned, one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the metropolitan police district [or the said county or borough of |] that late of is accused [or convicted] of the commission of the crime of within the jurisdiction of : This is therefore to command you in Her Majesty's name forthwith to apprehend the said and to bring him before me or some other magistrate sitting at this court for one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the county [or borough] of ] to be further dealt with according to law, for which this shall be your warrant. Given under my hand and seal at Bow-street, one of the police courts of the metropolis, [or in the county or borough aforesaid! this day of 18 . J. P. Firrm of Warrarafor bringing Prisoner iefore the Police Magistrate. County [or i To constable of the police force borough] } of and to all other peace ofScers in of to wit ( the said county [or boronght of Whereas late of accused [or alleged to be convicted of] the commission of the crime of within the jurisdiction of has been apprehended and brought before the undersigned, one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the said county [or borough] of And whereas by the Extradition Act, 1870, he is required to be brought before the chief magistrate of the metropolitan police court, or one of the police magistrates of the metro- polis sitting at Bow-street, within the metropolitan police district [or the stipendiary magistrate for ] : This is therefore to command you the said constable in Her Majesty's name forthwith to take and convey the said to the metropolitan police district [or the said ] and there carry him before the said chief magis- trate or one of the police magistrates of the metropoh's sitting at Bow-street within the said district [oo- before a stipendiary magistrate sitting in the said ] to show cause why he should not be surrendered in pursuance of the Extradition Act, 1870, and otherwise to be dealt with in accordance with law, for which this shall be your warrant. Given under my hand and seal at in the county [or borough] aforesaid, this day of 18 . X 3 iM The Extradition Act. Fotm of Warrant of Com/mttal. ,To one of the constables of the Metropolitan police I metropolitan police force, [w of the •*- the . Be it remembered that on this day of m the year of our Lord late Of is brought before me the chief magistrate of the metropolitan police courts [or one of the police magistrates of the meoropolis] sitting at the police Court in Bow-street, within the metro- politan police district, [or a stipendiary magistrate for ,] to show cause why he should not be surren- dered in pursuance of the Extradition Act, 1870, on the ground of his being acciised [or conViotedJ of the com- mission of the crime of within the jurisdiction of , and forasmuch as no sufficient cause has been shown to me why he should not be surrendered in pursuance of the said act : This is therefore to command you the said constable in Her Majesty's name forthwith to convey and deliver the body of the said into the custody of the said keeper of the at , and you the said keeper to receive the said into your custody, and him there safely to keep until he is thence delivered pursuant to the provisions of the said Extradition Act, for which this shall be your warrant. Given under my hand and seal at Bow-s'treet, one of the police courts of the metropolis, [m* at the said 3 this day of 18 . J. P. Foitn, of Wan-ant of Secretary of State for Sarrendei- of Fugitive. To the keeper of and to "Whereas late of accused [(»• convicted] of the commission of the crime of within the jurisdiction di , was delivered into the custody of you the keeper of by warrant dated pursuant to the Extradition Act, 1870: Now I do hereby, in pursuance of the said act, order you the said keeper to deliver the body of the said into the custody of the said , and I command you the said to receive the said into your custody, and to convey him within the jurisdiction of the said , and there place him in the Custody of any person or persotiS appointed by the said to receive him, for which this shall be your warrant. Given undter the hand and seal ot the lind^rsigned 'one of Her Majesty's principal Secretaries of State' this day of 33 ^ U net. cap. h8. Third Soheddxb. 467 Tear and Ohapter. TiUe. 6 & 7 Viot. 0. 75 6 & 7 Viot. 0. 76 8 & 9 Viot o. 120 25 & 26 Viot. 0. 70 29 &30Viot. 0.121 An Aot for giving effect to a oouven- tion between Her Majesty and the King of iJie French for the apprehen- sion of certain offenders. An Act for giving effect to a treaty between Her Majesty and the United States of America for the apprehension of certain offenders. An Act for facilitating execution of the treaties with France and the tTnited States of America for the afpprehension of certain offenders. An Act for giving effect to a conven- tion between Her Majesty and thd King of Denmark for the mutual sur* render of criminals. An Act for the amendment of the law relating to treaties of extradition. THE FOEGERY AOT. (83 & 34 Vict. cap. 58.) An Act to further amend the Law relating to indictable Offences hy Forgery. — [9 ADDKESSBS OP COUNSEL: upon the trial of an indictment °^' ADMINISTBATOES OF CONVICT'S PEOPBRTT: OroTTii may appoint ... ^^* remuneration of ... *^q convict's property vested in AaQ_li9 duties and rigtts, of ... , ^raj^ how required to account **"' "' ADMIEALTT: as to offences committed within the jurisdiction of ... _ ... Ha as to offences against the Malicious Injuries Act, within the jurisdiction of _ ... _ J^|° as to trial of offences of perjury within jurisdiction of the ... 172 trial of coin offences 1^3 offences under the Offences against the Person Act com- mitted within the jurisdiction of 230 false oath taken before registrar, perjury 235 ADULTEEEH: larceny by AFFIDAVIT: stealing, &c. 42 AFFIEMATION: of persons in criminal proceedings in lien of oath 236 AGENTS : frauds by 67, 68 AGGEAVATED ASSAULTS: upon a child or female, how to be dealt with ... ... ... 215 AIDEES : punishment of, upon summary conviction under the Malicious Injuries Act 130 AID TO DISOHAEGED PEISONEES: the statute as to 240 funds from which payments provided 242 ANGLEES : when tackle of, may be seized 39 ANIMALS : killing with intent to steal the carcase 31 stealing, ordinarily kept in confinement, and not the subject of larceny at common law 36 if found in possession, justice may order restoration ... 37 APPEAL: against a summary conviction under the Larceny Act ... 89 upon a conviction under the MaUcious Injuries Act ... 132 APPEEHENSIONi of a party offering stolen property 85 when parties may be ajiprehended without a warrant ... 85 a person found committing an offence under the Malicious Injuries Act may be apprehended without a warrant ... 130 of persona committing offences under Coinage Act 191 Index. 473 APPEENTIOE: criminal treatment of, Jby master or mistress page 201 AQUEDUCT : ■ damaging 117 ABBEST : when parties may be apprehended without a warrant ... 85 of persons committing ofiences under Ooinage Act 191 AEMS, LOADED : what constitutes, under the Offences against the Person Act 204 AET, WOKKS OP : injuries to 120 ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO BOB : may be found guilty of, upon an indictment for robbery ... 46 offence of 48 by a person armed 49 by two or more 49 at time of robbery, beating, &c 49 ASSAULTS: upon a minister to obstruct his celebrating divine service, or the performance of his duty. ... . 211 by arresting minister whilst engaged in his duties ... '" 212 upon a magistrate, on account of his endeavours to prevent a wreck of any vessel 'iV2 with intent to commit a felony 212 upon a peace officer in the execution of his duty ... ... 212 upon a person with intent to resist his lawful apprehension... 213 npon a person with intent to obstruct the buying or selling of or free passage of certain goods ... 213 npon a seaman to prevent his exercising his calling, &c. ... 214 in pursuance of any combination, &c. connected with trade 214 when, and how to be dealt with summarily 215 common assaults, how dealt With summanly 215 aggravated, upon children and females...- 215 certificate to be given npon conviction, or if not proved, or so trifling as not to merit any punishment 216 a bar to other proceedings ... ... ' 217 conviction or acijuittal of, no bar to a subsequent indictment for manslaughter ... - ... 217 parties not to deal with charge of title to lands, &c. comes in question 218 assault occasioning actual bodily harm 218 punishment for common assault upon an indictment ... 218 upon conviction upon an indictment, the court may order payment by defendant of prosecutoi^s costs 233 may be levied by distress 233 ATTEMPT : to commit larceny, as to 26 to set fire to a building, &c 103 to destroy buildings, Sea. by explosive substances 103 to set fire to crops ... > 109 to set fire to any mine 113 to administer poison, shoot, drown, &c.with intent to murder 202 to commit murder by any means 203 474 Index. ATTEMPT (cmtinmd): to choke, suffocate, or strangle i*"?^ 20o to procure abortion 225 ATTEMPTS, see the various heads of subjects. ATTESTING WITNESS : when proof by, unnecessary 321 ATTOENET: frauds by 67, 68 AUCTION, MOCK: pretended sale at 23 AUTHORITY FOB PAYMENT OF MONEY, &c. : forgery of 166 BAILEE: • fraudulently converting property 26 what constitutes a conversion 36 BANK: of any river, &0. damaging or destroying 116 injuring any piles, &c. of 116 BANKER: frauds by ... ... 67, 68 BANK NOTES: engraving or having plates of 149 forgery of 146 engraving any device, &o. of 160 making frame, mould, &c. for the manufacture of paper for banknotes 161 BANK OF ENGLAND: forging note of 146 ma&ng or having mould for iuaMng 147 BANK OF ENGLAND OB lEELAND: embezzlement by officers of 65 BAB OF TURNPIKE : damaging ... ... ... ■■■ 118 BARGE : stealing from ... ... ... 57 BESTIALITY : the offence of 227 attempts to cotundt .> 227 carnal knowledge, proof of 227 BATTERY, see " Assaults." BEASTS : stealing, ordinarily kept in confinement, and not the subject of larceny at common law 36 unlawfully and maliciously killing, &c, any domestic beast 121 BIGAMY: the offence of ... i, 223 where offender may be tried „. ... ,_ 224 BILL OF EXCHANGE: forgery of 146 receivmg or having in possession forged bill of exchange 146 forgery of , 154 accepting, &c. by procuration fraudulently ., 156 Index. 475 BIEDS: stealing, ordinarily kept in confinement, and not the subject of larceny at common law page 36 anlavrfully and maliciously killing, &c. any domestic bird 121 BIKTHS, see " Eegister of Bikths." BIRTH, CONCEALING THE: the offence of 226 BOAT: stealing from , 57 BODILY INJURY : inflicting 205 BODILY HARM : assault occasioning actual bodily harm, punishment of ... 218 BONDS : larceny of , 40 destruction, &c. Of 40 forgery of 153 BRIDGE : damaging 117 BEOKEE : frauds by 67, 68 BUILDING : stealing metal, wood, glass, &c fixed to 43 setting flre to 95, 102 Betting fire to woods in 102 attempting to set fire to a building, &c. 103 damaging by explosive substance 103 rioters demolishing, &c 104 rioters injuring 105 tenants of, maOeiously injuring 105 destroying, &c. with explosive substance with intent to commit murder > 202 placing gunpowder, &c. near to, with intent, &c 209 BUILDING, PUBLIC: setting fire to 102 BULL: stealing 31 BUOYS: removing or destroying 124 BURGLARY : in a church, chapel, or meeting house 53 by breaking out of a dwelling-house 53 punishment of burglary 53 BUYING OR SELLING COUNTERFEIT COIN : the offence of 177 CALF: stealing 31 CANAL, NAVIGABLE: stealing from vessels on <• — 57 damaging or destroying any bank, dam, or wall of » 115 injuring any piles, &c, of 116 476 Index. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: mode of carrying out P^S^ 389-391 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT WITHIN PEISONS ACT, 1867 : provisions of 389-394 OAKOASE : killing animals with intenf to steal the carcase 31 CARRIAGE! furiously driving, whereby, &c — •^H wilful misconduct of any person having the care of, whereby, &c 211 CATTLE : killing or maiming 121 CEETIPIOATB : when to be given, upon the hearing of a charge of assault ... 216 to be a bar to other proceedings for the same assault ... 217 of approval of prisoners' aid societies 241 of prisonerB' aid societies, how to be granted ... . ... 241 how to be revoked 242 CEETIPICATB OF MARRIAGE: forgery of .... ' 162 CERTIORARI: taken away under Larceny Act ... 90 taken away in certain cases under the Malicious Injuries Act 134 taken away in cases under the Coinage Act 191 taken away in Offences Against the Person Act 231 CHAPEL (see "BniLDiNo"): breaking and entering 52 setting fire to 100 CHANCERY, COURT OF: forgery of proceedings, and process of 161 CHEMISTS, PHARMACEUTICAL : as to exemption of, from serving on juries 295 CHEQUE:- obliterating crossing on 156 CHILD : exposing, whereby life endangered or health permanently injured , ... ... 207 aggravated assault upon, hard to be dealt with ... 215 CHILD, CONCEALING BIRTH OF: the offence of ... ... ... ..< ... 226 CHILD-STEALING: the offence of ... 223 harbouring stolen child ... ... 223 CHLOROFORM : using, with intent, &o. ... ..a ... .. ... 205 attempting to use ... ... ... .. ... 205 CHOKE: attempts to choke, with intent, &0 ... 206 CHURCH (see " Buildino ") : breaking and entering ... ... ■■• .. ... 52 setting Sre to ... . ... 100 Iiidex. 477 CLAIM OF BIGHT : as to, upon an information page 30 with reference to charges of malicious mischief 127 CLERGYMAN: assaulting 211 OLEBK: larceny by 69 embezzlement by 69 CLERK TO THE GUARDIANS : may be bound over to prosecute in certain cases 232 CLEEKS TO ATTOENETS : as to exemption of, from serving on juries 295 OLEBK OP THE PEACE: duties of, with reference to juries ... 296 COAOH-HOUSE : setting fire to 101 COAL, see " Obb." COAL MINE : setting fire to 113 conveying water into 114 CODICIL (see" Will"): forgery of 154 COIN.: interpretation of terms under Coinage Act 174 counterfeiting gold or silver coin ... ... 175 colouring counterfeit coin to resemble gold or silver coin ... 176 colouring or altering genuine coin to make it pass for a higher coin 176 impairing with intent, &c. ... ' " " 176 having in possession filings or chippings of gold or silver coin 177 buying or selling counterfeit coin 177 importing counterfeit coin 178 exporting counterfeit coin 178 uttering counterfeit gold or silver coin 179 uttering, accompanied by possession of other counterfeit coin 179 uttering after a previous uttering 179 having three or more pieces of bad coin in' possession with intent 180 second offence a felony 180 uttering medals as current coin 181 counterfeiting copper coin 181 uttering base copper coin... 181 defacing coin 181 tendering defaced coin 183 counterfeiting foreign coin " 183, 185 bringing same into the kingdom 183 tendering ... ... ... • • 184 secondand third offences... • ■ 184 having more than five pieces of counterfeit foreign coin in possession, with intent, &c 18a having in possession coining tools 186 478 Index. COIN (cmtimied): conveying coining tools out of the Mint page 187 coins suspected tp be counterfeit or diminished may be cut by person to whom tendered 188 as to seizing counterfeit coin 188 venue in cases of counterfeit coin 190 proof of coin being counterfeit 190 where coin not complete ... 191 apprehension of persons committing offences under Coinage let 191 certiorari taken away in cases under Coinage Act 191 venue in actions under Coinage Act 191 notice of action 192 pleading the general issue 192 tender ot amends 192 punishment of principals in the second degree 193 trial of offences committed within jurisdiction of the Admiralty 193 evidence of a previous conviction 194 fine and sureties for coinage offences 195 hard labour for coin offences 196 solitary confinement for coin offences 196 costs of prosecutions in coin offences 197 COINING TOOLS: having in possession 186 conveying tools out of the Mint 187 COLOUEING OOtTNTEEFEIT OOm: as to 175 to make it pass for coin of a higher value 176 COLT: stealing 31 COMBINATION : assault in pursuance of any, connected with tra^e 214 COMMON ASSAULT : how dealt with summarily 215 COMPANIES ACT (THE) : offences under 293, 294 COMPARISON OP HANDWRITING : when permitted ,,. , 321 COMPENSATION: . to persons defrauded or injured by felony 136 CONSEEVATOBT: stealing, damaging, &a productions of 48 C0N8PERACT : assault in furtherance of any, connected with trade 114 to commit murder .., [|] '" 199 CONSTABLE : larceny by 52 embezzlement by "_' gg as to apprehenmng a person loitering at night and suspected of any felony against the Larceny Act og when he may apprehend a person loitering by night!!! '" 129 Index. 479 CONSTABLE (continued): may apprehend without a warrant any person found com- mitting an offence under the Malicious Iniuries Act page 130 assault upon, in the execution of his duty , 211 power to apprehend certain persons loitering about at night 229 power of, under the Poaching Prevention Act... 304 CONVICT : definition of the word in the 33 & 34 Vict c. 23 437 disability to alienate or sue for property 438 as to the appointment of administrators to convict's property 438 CONVICTION : to be returned to the quarter sessions 91 under the Malicious Injuries Act to be returned to the Siarter sessions , , 134 er Malicious Injuries Act, how proved in evidence ... 134 for treason or felony causing forfeiture of office 433 for treason or felony, disabilities arising therefrom ... 433, 434 COPPER COIN: counterfeiting 181 uttering 182 COPAKTNEESHIP: larceny by members of 400, 401 embezzlement by 400, 401 COEN: setting fire to 108 setting fire to stacks of 108 COEPOEATION : members of, frandulently applying property of 72 keeping false accounts 73 COSTS : of prosecutions in misdemeanors under Larceny Act 98 of prosecutions of misdemeanors under the Malicious Inju- ries Act 138 of prosecution for certain misdemeanors in the Forgery Act 173 in coin prosecutions 197 upon conviction upon an indictment for an assault the court may order payment by defendant of prosecutor's costs ... 233 may be levied by distress 233 of prosecution of misdemeanors nnder the Offences against the Person Act 234 of persons acquitted npon indictments where they have not been committed or held to bail 375 of witness for prisoner who has been bound over 377 when party convicted of treason or felony may be condemned to pay costs of prosecution 434 how ordered to be paid 434 COUNSEL : addresses of, npon an indictment 319 COUNTEEPEIT COIN, see the various heads. COHNTEEFEITrNG GOLD OB SILVEE COIN : offence of 175 COUNTING-HOUSE : breaking into or out of 54 A^! 480 Index. COUBT OP JUSTICE : stealing, &c. any document of PV ™ OOUET OF EEOOED: stealing, &c. any document of *^ OOUKTS OF LAW: forging documents or pt'oceedings of l*' COUBT BOLLS : forgery of •" ^"° COW: stealmg •. °'- ifrosBvesssis^^v^jj^^.. ^%M K 57 JEIMINAL POSSESSIOSy^ in forgery, interpretation of 168 CEIMINALS, see " Habitual Okiminals Act, 1869." CEIMINALS, FUGITIVE: provisions of 33 li^ 34 Vict. c. 52 , 450-467 OEOPS ; setting fire to 108 OUEATOE, INTEEIM: as to appointment and removal of 442, 443 powers and duties of 444, 445 how required to account 446, 447 OUETILAGE : what buildings within 53 breaking into a building within, and committing a felony ... 54 DAM: of any river, &c. damaging or destroying .. 116 injuring any piles, &c. of 116 DAMAGE: to any mine 114 DEALEES IN OLD METAL: provision as to 237-239 DEATH, SENTENCE OP : how to be executed 198, 199 mode of carrying out punishment of 389-394 DEATHS, see "Begistee op Deaths." DEBENTUEES : forgery of 157 DEBTOES' ACT, 1869 : offences under 401-416 DEOLABATION: of juror who objects to be sworn 380 in lien of oath 448, 449 DEOLABATION OP TITLE ACT (25 & 26 Vict. c. 67): offences under 274, 275 DEEDS : stealing, destroying, &c; ... "... 41 forgery of 153 forgery of matters connected with the registry of 169 Index. 481 DEEB: stealing in an inclosed part of a forest page 32 stealing in any inclosed ground 32 suspected persons found in possession of venision, &c. and not satisfactorily accounting for it 33 setting engines for taking -deer 34 unlawfully destroying fences 33 keepers may seize guns, &c ... 34 penalty for resisting keepers 34 DEFACING COIN : the offence of 182 tendering defaced coin 183 DEFILEMENT OF A GIRL: procuring the 219 DEFRAUD : intefit to, as regards particular persons, need not be stated in an indictment under Malicious Injuries Act 129 DEPOSITION : stealing, &o. 42 power to take deposition of a witness who is ill ... 378-380 DIRECTORS OP COMPANIES: fraudulently applying property of company 72 keeping false accounts 73 destroying, altering, &c. books ... 73 making fraudulent statements 73 DISCHARGED PRISONERS, AID TO : the statute 25 & 26 Vict. c. 44 240 funds from which payments provided 242 DIVIDEND WARRANT: clerk in Sank of England making out false diridend warrant 142 DOCK: stealing from 57 "DOCUMENT OF TITLE TO GOODS": interpretation of 22 "DOCUMENT OP TITLE TO LANDS": interpretation of 22 stealing, destroying, &c 41 DOOUMENTABT EVIDENCE ACT, 1868 : provisions of 395-398 DOG: stealing 3d second offence 35 possession of stolen dogs 35 second offence ... 35 taking money to restore 36 unlawfully and maliciously killing, maiming, &c. 121 DRAIN : injuring any 115 injuring any pipes. Sea. of 116 damaging or destroying any bank, dam, or wall of 11^ injuring any piles, &c. of llfi T 482 Index. DEIVEK: of a carriage furiously driving, &c. whereby, &c. ... page zll DEOWNING: attempting to drown, with intent to commit murder ... 202 DRUGS : procuring, to cause abortion 2^^ DWELLING-HOUSE: burglary in °| what a curtilage of O" entering by night with intent to commit a felony 53 breaking into 64 breaking out of 64 stealing in, to the value of 51 66 stealing in, with menaces 66 setting fire to, any person being therein ... ... ... 100 EAST INDIA BOND: forging 143 ELECTEIC TELEGRAPH : injuries to 119 offences as to 119 attempts 119 EMBEZZLEMENT : by clerks, servants, public officers, and police officers 59, 63 as to including distinct acts of embezzlement in one indict- ment 64 person indicted for, may be convicted of larceny 64 by officers of the Bank of England or Ireland 65 ENGINE HOUSE : setting fire to 101 EQUITY, COURTS OF: forging documents or proceedings of 167 EVIDENCE : provisions of the Eelony and Misdemeanor (Evidence and Practice Amendment) Act (28 Vict c. 18) 318-321 Documentary Evidence Act, 1868 ... 395-398 . provisions of the Evidence Further Amendment Act, 1869 416-418 of parties in actions of breach of promise of marriage ... 417 of parties, husbands and wives, to be witnesses in suits for adultery 417 Amendment Act^ 1870 (33 & 34 Vict. o. 44) 448, 449 EWE :' stealing ... 31 EXCHEQUER BILLS : forgery of 143 making plates in imitation of those used for exchequer bills... 144 making paper in imitation of 144 having in possession papers, plates, or dies used for ... .'.'.' 145 EXCUSABLE HOMICIDE : in forfeiture of property for 200 Index. 483 EXPENSES, see " Costs :'■ of witnesses for prisoner, when indictment removed under the Jurisdiction in Homicides Act page 'i&i provisions of Prosecution Expenses Act, 1866 323-326 when party convicted of treason or felony may be condemned to pay expenses of prosecution 434 how ordered to be paid 434 EXPLOSIVE SUBSTANCE: injuring buildings, &c. by 103 destroying, &c. any building with intent to murder , 202 doing harm to persons by 208 causing it to explode with intent, &c 208 placing near a building, &c. with intent 209 having in possession, making, &c. to commit offences under the Offences against the Person Act 228 search for 229 EXPOETING COUNTEEFEIT COIN: the offence of 178 EXPOSING CHILD: whereby its life is endangered, or its health permanently injured 207 EXTEADITION ACT : 33 & 34 Vict 0. 52 450-467 FACTORS : frauds by 69 FALSE ENTEIES : making, in books of public funds 142 FALSE PEESONATION: of owners of stock 468 FALSE PEETENCES : the offence of 75 FAEM BUILDING : setting fire to 101 FELONY: . . ^ punishment for simple larceny after a previous conviction for felony •. . ••■ 29 compensation may be allowed to persons defrauded or injured by felony 136 forfeiture for 433-449 persons guilty of, may be condemned to pay costs or ex- penses of prosecution ... ... 434 how costs or expenses ordered to be paid ...434 certain misdemeanors under Coinage Act made such, if a previous conviction 1^" FEMALES: aggravated assaults upon, how to be dealt with ^15 FENCE : stealing, &o. any live or dead fence 40 destroying or injuring H" FILINGS OE CHIPPINGS OF COIN : having same in unlawful possession 117 T 2 484 Index. PILLT : stealing P<>S^ °^ FINDING LOST PEOPEKTT: as to 26 FINE : when it may be imposed imder Larceny Act _ ••• "" when it maybe imposed for offences under the Malicious Injuries Act 136 in coin prosecutions 1^5 for offences against the Offences against the Person Act ... 231 FISH: taking in any water situate in land belonging to a dwelling- house or in a private fishery elsewhere 38 when tackle of fishers may be seized 39 FISH-POND : injuries to 116 FIXTUEES : stealing 43 FOEEIGN BILLS OE NOTES : engraving plates for 152 FOEEIGN COIN : counterfeiting ... 183, 185 bringing into the kingdom ... ... ... ... ... 183 tendering ... ... 184 second and third offences... ... 184 having more than five pieces of base foreign coin in posses- sion with intent, &c 185 FOEFEITUEES: ' application of, upon summary conviction 87 application of, under the Malicious Injuries Act 131 abolition of, for treason and felony 433 definition of the word in the 33 & 34 Vict. o. 23 437 for Treason and Felony Act (33 & 34 Vict. c. 23) ... 433-449 FOEGED INSTBUMENTS : demanding money, &o. upon 164 FOEGEET (see "Merchandise Marks Act"): of the Great Seal, &c 139 of public stocks 140 of transfer. of shades in any public company 140 of power, qf attorney 140 of attestation to power of attorney 141 of East India bond 143 of exchequer bills, &o 143 of bank notes 146 of bill of exchange... ... 146 receiving or having in possession 146 of deeds, bonds, assignments, &o. 163 of writing obligatory ... 163 of signature of witness to 16S of a will,' testament, or codicil ... 154 of bill of exchange or promissory note " *'_ 154 of undertaking, warrant, order, authority, or request for "X ayment of money, or delivery, &o. of goods 156 Index. . 485 FORGEEY (^continued) : of debentures page 157 of proceedings of courts of law 157 • of documents or proceedings of courts of law or equity ... 157 of official documents by clerks, &c 158 of iustraments made evidence by act of Parliament 159 of court rolls 159 of matters connected with the registry of deeds 159 of process and proceedings of parties 160 of proceedings connected with the accountant-general ... 161 of process and proceedings of the Court of Chancery ... 161 of marriage license, or certificate of marriage 162 of registers of births, marriages, and deaths 162 demanding money, cSfcc. upon forged instruments 164 of instruments of value generally 165 of forging in England documents, &c. made elsewhere ... 165 forgers may be tiied in county where apprehended, or in custody r 167 descriptions of instrument in indictment 167 intent to defraud particular persons need not be alleged or proved 168 " criminal possession," interpretation of 168 as to searching for instruments employed in forgery ... 168 punishment for 169, 170, 172 principles in the second degree, punishment of 171 punishment of abettors in certain misdemeanors under For- gery Act 172 as to trial of offenders if offence committed within the juris- diction of the Admiralty 172 hard labour for 173 solitary confinement for 173 costs in prosecution for certain misdemeanors in Forgery Act 173 offence of, under the Merchandise Harks Act 276-292 under Documentary Evidence Act, 1868 396 of stock certificate or coupon 468 of certificate or duplicate certificate under National Debt Act 469 engraving plates for 468 FOEGBEY ACT, 1870 : provisions of 467 FRAUD, see "False Pketence." FRAUDULENT DEBTORS: offences of 401-416 FEUIT : stealing, damaging, &c damaging, &c. growing in any garden, &c. of elsewhere 46 Ill 112 FUGITIVE CRIMINALS : provisions of 33 & 84 Vict. c. 52 ... 450-467 FUBIOUS DRIVING: as to injuries from 211 FURZE: setting fire to 108 486 .Ind&c. GAMING : certain kinds of, within the Vagrant Act Amendment Act, 1868 i"«?e 399 GAOLER: to bring up the body of any person indicted without a writ of habeas cm-pus under order of the court 381 GAKDEN : stealing, damaging, &c. productions of 46 GAS: stealing ^9 GATE : stealing or injuring •■• 45 destroying or injuring 113 GELDING : stealing 31 GBNEKAL ISSUE (sec "Action"): . in actions under Coinage Act 192 as to pleading in actions under the Malicious Injuries Act ... 135 GLASS : fixed to a building, stealing 43 GIEL: procuring defilement of 219 carnally knowing under ten years of age 219 carnally knowing between ten and twelve years of age ... 219 attempts to commit the two last offences 220 fraudulent abduction of, against the will 221 forcible abduction of any woman 221 abduction of, under sixteen years of age 222 GOODS : setting fire to, in building 102 destroying, &o. in the process of manufacture 106 destroying, &c. goods of a wreck 124 GOVERNMENT OFFICE: stealing, &o. any document of 43 GRAIN : setting fire to 108 setting fire to sta4)k of 108 GRASS : setting fire to 108 GREAT SEAL: forgery of 139 GREENHOUSE: stealing, damaging, &o. products of 46 GRIEVOUS BODILY HARM: shooting at or wounding with intent to do ... 204 by any means "whatever ..; ' .,, ^^, 204. administering, i;c. poison, &c. so as to cause ,', 206 inflicting " '"_ 205 GUARDIANS OP THE POOR: may prosecute in certain cases 232 Index. 487 GUNPOWDER (see "Explosive Sdbstanoh": destroying, &o. any buildings with intent to mur,der page 202 doing harm to persons by explosion of 208 causing gunpowder to explode with intent, &o 208 placing near a building, &c. with intent 209 placing near to any ship or vessel with intent to damage it 123 having in possession, making, &o. to commit offences under the Offences against the Person Act 228 search for 229 HABITUAL OKIMINALS ACT, 1869 ; provisions of 418-432 HANDWKITING : as to comparison of, in criminal cases 321 HAKD LABOUB: as to, under Larceny Act 97 as to, under the Malicious Injuries Act 136 punishment of, under Forgery Act 173 for offences against the Offences against the Person Act ... 230 in coin prosecutions 196 HAKES : killing, &c in a warren by night 34 killing, &c in the daytime 35 HAT; setting fire to 108 HEATH: setting fire to 108 HEIFER: stealing 31 HOMICIDES ACT (25 & 26 Vict. c. 65) : jurisdiction in 261 HIGH TREASON: punishment for 448 HOPBINDS : destroying 189 HORSE : stealing 31 HOTHOUSE : stealing, damaging, &c. productions of 46 HOUSE: breaking into or out of 54 setting fire to ... _ 101 HOUSEBREAKING: breaking into a house, &o. with intent to commit a felony ... 54 being armed with intent to break into any house, &c. by night 55 punishment for a second offence 56 as to 54 IMPAIRING COIN : impairing coin with intent, &c, 176 IMPORTING COUNTERFEIT COIN : the offence of ... 178 488 Index. INCITING TO COMMIT A FELONY : „ ' when the proper charge P"^^ 2 after the fact, as to « punishment of ,"j d prosecution of accessories after principal has been convictea fl several accessories may be included in one indictment thougn • principal not included . trial of accessories INDICTMENT : .„ for stealing, &c. oysters from an oyster fishery *" for stealing, destroying, &o. any deed of title to land ... W for stealing, destroying, &o. *^ for stealing any public document *^ against a public servant for larceny or embezzlement ... oo for embezzlement, as to including distinct acts in one indict- ment 64 for a false pretence '' for stealing and receiving ^^ when previous conviction charged ••. ^" intent to injure or defraud particular persons need not be stated in an indictment under the Malicious Injuries to Property Act 129 for forging description of instrument •. •.- 1"' description of instrument in indictments for engraving, &o. 167 intent to defraud particular persons need not be alleged ... 168 for murder or manslaughter, form of 199 for murder or manslaughter under Homicides Act ... 262-266 addresses of counsel upon 319 INDUSTRIAL SCHOOLS ACT, 1866 : provisions of 349-373 "INFAMOUS CEIME:" defined 51 INSENSIBILITY: doing an-act to cause, with intent, &o 205 INTENT, see the various heads. INTENT TO DEFEAUD : intent to defraud particular persons need not be stated in an Ipdictment against particular persons 129 INTENT TO BOB: conviction of, upon an indictment for robbery 48 INTERPRETATION OF TERMS : "document of title to goods" 22 " documeAt of title to lands " 22 "trustee" 23 " valuable security " 23 "property" 23 "night" 23 of terms under Coinage Act 174 INTEREOQATOEY : stealing, &c. 42 JETTY : injuring any 115 injuring any piles, &c. of ... ,„ ,,, ng Index. 489 JURIES ACT, 1862 : who exempt from serving upon juries page 296, 296 JURISDICTION IN HOMICIDES ACT, see " Homicides Act." JUKOES (fee 25 & 26 Vict. o. 107) : how to be summoned 298 who objeota to be sworn, declaration of 380 JUSTICES (see the various heads) : jurisdiction in cases where snares, &c. for taking deer found in possession of parties 33 may issu6 search warrant for articles intended to be used for malicious mischief 127 removal of disqualifications of 382 KILLING ANIMALS : with intent to steal the carcase 31 LAMB : stealing 31 LAND, TITLE TO : where it comes in question upon a charge of assault ... 218 LAND TKANSFEE ACT : provisions as to offences against 243 making false statements to obtain registration 243 the act for 243 offences against 243-245 LAPIS CALUMNAEIS, see "Orb." LAECEN r (see the various heads) : every larceny of the same nature whatever the value ... 24 as to attempts to commit 26 by a bailee 26 punishment for simple larceny 27 three larcenies within sis months may be charged in one indictment 28 proving three takings upon a charge of a single taking ... 28 punishment for, after a previous conviction for felony ... 29 from the person 48 on trial, may be convicted of an assault with intent to rob... 48 person indicted for, may be convicted of embezzlement ... 64 by tenants and lodgers 66 stealers in one part of kingdom, when triable in another part 92 LABCENT ACT (24 & 25 Vict. u. 96) 22 LAUDANUM: using with intent, &c. 205 attempting to use 205 LAW, COURTS OP: forging documents or proceedings of 157 LETTEE : demanding money, &c. with menaces 49 LETTEE, THREATENING: sending, &c. threatening to accuse of crime, with intent to extort' ' 50 sending any, threatening to murder 203 LICENCE : under Penal Servitude Act 312-317 t3 490 Index. LIMITED PENALTIES ACT (27 & 28 Vict. o. 110) : provisions of P<^9^ °1' LOADED ARMS : ■what constitutes under the Offences against the Person Act... 204 LOCK: injuring any 11^ injuring any piles, &c. of ^^" LOST PEOPERTT: as to stealing 26 MACHINE : having in possession, making, &o. to commit offences under the Offences against the Person Act 228 search for 229 MACHINERY (see " Building ") : destroying, &o 107 of any mine, obstructing or damaging 115 MAGISTRATE: assault upon, when endeavouring to preserve a wreck of a vessel 211 MALICE : not necessary to prove in cases within the Malicious Injuries to Property Act 129 MALICIOUS INJURIES (see the various heads) : committing damage or spoil upon any real or personal property not otherwise provided for, exceeding 5Z. ... 125 punishment of persons who commit malicious injuries not otherwise provided for 126 punishment for, not to extend to persona who act under a claim of right 127 not necessary to prove malice in charges of 129 provisions of the act apply through the party in possession of the property 129 intent to injure or defraud particular persons need not be stated in indictment 129 persons found committing, may be apprehended without a warrant 130 course of proceeding against parties charged 130 how party to be dealt with upon summary conviction ... 131 appeal after a summary conviction 132 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF: search warrant to search for articles intended to be used for committing malicious mischief 127 MANAGER OF COMPANY : destroying, &c. books of company 73 making fraudulent statements 73 MANGANESE, see " Obe." MANSLAUGHTER : form of indictment of 199 punishment for 199 when committed abroad 200, 201 indictment for after a prior acquittal or committal for assault ... ,,^ 217 Index, 491 MANSLAUGHTEK (conHmed): indictment for, under Homicides Act paj/e 262-266 provisions for the trial of prisoners who are subject to the Mutiny Act 262-264 MAN-TEAPS : as to setting , ••• 209 MANUPA0TUKE8 : stealing articles in the process of manufacture 56 destroying, &o. goods in 106 MARE: stealing 31 MAEKS, TRADE : provisions as to 276-292 MAEKS (MERCHANDISE) ACT : offences against 276-292 MABEIAGE LICENCE : forgery of 162 MAKRIAGES, see "Keqister of Maeeiageb." MARSH: damaging or destroying any bank, drain, or wall of 115 injuring any piles, &o. of 116 MASTEE: refusing or neglecting to provide servant or apprentice with ' food, or causing bodily harm ... 207 MALTH0U8E : setting fire to 101 MEDALS : littering as current coin , 181 MEETING HOUSE (see "Buildino") : breaking and entering 52 setting fire to 100 MENACES : sending letter, &c. demanding money, &c. with menaces ... 49 MERCHANDISE MARKS ACT (25 & 26 VicT. o. 88): offences under 276-289 MERCHANT: frauds by 67, 68 MERCHANT SHIPPINQ ACT: offences against 245-247 MERCHANT SHIPPING AMENDMENT ACT : offences against 245 METAL : fixed to a building, stealing i. ... 43 METAL, OLD: provisions as to dealers in 237-239 MILL: setting fire to 101 MINERAL FUEL : setting fire to any mine of 113 carrying water into 114 492 .Index. MINEEALS, see " Ore." MINES : larceny from P'^9^ f setting fire to |^° conveying water into |*^ damaging .... 11* damaging machinery of 1" MINERS : removing ore with intent to defraud *' MISAPPKOPEIATION BY SEEVANTS ACT (26 & 27 Vict. c. 103) : the provisions of 306-310 MISTRESS : refusing or neglecting to provide servant or apprentice with food, or causing bodily harm 207 MONEY : taking, to restore stolen dog 36 demanding by letter, &c. with menaces 49 demanding, with intent to steal 30 taking, for helping to the recovery of stolen property ... 84 found on prisoner, to be given to purchaser of property not known to be stolen on restitution of property 381 MUNDICK, see " Ore." MUEDBE: punishment for ... 198 sentence for ... ... 198 conspiracy to commit 199 form of indictment for 199 petit treason 200 when committed abroad 200, 201 administering poison or wounding with intent to murder ... 201 destroying, &c. building with intent to murder 202 setting flre to or casting away a ship with intent to murder . 202 attempting to shoot, poison, drown, &c. with intent to murder 202 attempting to murder by any means 203 letters, threatening to murder 203 indictment for, under Homicides Act 262 provisions for the trial of prisoners who are subject to the Mutiny Act 262,264 MUTINY ACT: provisions.for the trial of prisoners for homicide ... 262-263 MUTINY : indictment of persons for murder or manslaughter who are subject to 262-266 NAVAL STORES: . offences with reference to 248-260 "NAVAL STORES ACT, 1862: offences under 247-260 NAVAL STORES ACT, 1867 : provisioL-n of 383-389 Index. 493 "NIGHT": interpretation of ^^g 24 entering a dwelling-house by, with intent to commit a felony jg being armed with intent to break and enter any house by "isjit 65 punishment for a second offence 56 NOTICE OF ACTION : as to, under the Malicious Injuries Act 135 in actions undet CoinAge Act ,., ...' .'" 192 NOXIOUS THING: administering, so as to do grievous bodily' harm 206 with intent to injure, aggrieve, or annoy 206 administering, to procure abortion [[, 226 NUESBKT GEOUND : stealing, damaging, &c. productions of 46 OATH : declaration in lieu of „, ,,, ... 448 449 OFFICE : forfeiture of, on convictiou of treason or felony 433 OLD METAL, DEALERS IN : provisions as to 237-239 ORE: stealing, &c. from a mine, &e. 47 OVERSEERS OP THE POOR: may prosecute in certain cases 282 PALINGS : stealing, &e. 46 PANEL : stealing, &c. 42 PARISH OFFICERS : duties of, with reference to jury lists 296, 297 PARTRIDGES, YOUNG: when a stealing of 25 PEACE OFFICER (see "Constable"): as to apprehending a person loitering at night and suspected of any felony against the Ijarceny Act 86 power to apprehend certain persons loitering about at night. 229 having cause to suspect a person of felony, and loitering by night, may apprehend 129 may apprehend' without a warrant any person found 00m- mittiug an offence under the Malicious Injuries Act ... 130 assault upon, in the execution of his duty 211 PENALTIES: application of, on summary conviction 87 application of, under the Malicious Injuries Act 131 PENALTIES (LIMITED) ACT : provisions of 317 provisions of Small Penalties Act, 1865 321-323 PENSION: forfeiture of, on conviction for treason or felony 433 494 Index. PEEJCJEY: „„, false oath before registrar in the Admiralty Court ... page IdO for making false affirmation in criminal proceedings 237 PERSON : larceny from the •■• upon trial of larceny from the person, jury may oonviot of an assault with intent to rob *° PERSONATION: of person entitled to stock, &o 1*^ PERSONATION, FALSE : of owners of stock *"** PENAL SERVITUDE : alteration of the term of 29 PENAL SERVITUDE ACTS AMENDMENT ACT (27 & 28 Vict. c. 47): provisions of 310-317 PIGEONS: unlawfully killing, &o "7 ™ES = injurmg ■'■^° PETIT TREASON : to be deemed murder only 200 PLANT : damaging, &c. growing in any garden, &c. Ill of elsewhere 112 stealing, damaging, &c 46 PLEASURE-GROUND : stealing, damaging, &c. productions of 46 POISON: administering with intent to murder 201 attempting to administer with intent to murder 202 administering, &a. so as to do grievous bodily harm 206 with intent to injure, aggrieve, or annoy 206 verdict of the jury upon such a charge 206 administering to procure abortion 225 POLICE OFFICER: larceny by 62 embezzlement by 63 POND: inj'uries to 116 POOL : damaging or destroying any bank, dam, or wall of 115 injuring piles, &o. of 116 PORT: stealing from vessels in any 57 POSSESSION : of counterfeit coin, what shall constitute it 175 of three or more pieces of bad coin with intent ... ... 180 POWER OP ATTORNEY : persons acting under, fraudulently selling property 69 Index. 495 POWER OF ATTOENBT (continued) : forging signature to page 141 forging, or putting off forged 140 PRESUMPTION : arising from recent possession 25 PREVIOUS CONVICTION: for simple larceny after a previous oonyiction for felony ... 29 of an indictable misdemeanor under the act 29 as to indictment 93 how and when proved at the trial 95 evidence of, in coin offences 194 how and when proved in coin prosecutions ... ... ... 194 of a witness, how it may be given in evidence 320 PRISONERS : when they may be indicted under the Homicides Act ... 262 expenses of witnesses of, when indictment removed under the jurisdiction in Homicides Act 268 PRISONERS, DISCHARGED: aid to (statute) ■ 240 funds from which payments provided 242 PRIVY SEAL : forgery' of 139 PROCESS : stealing, &c. '42 PROCURATION : accepting, drawing, &o. bill of exchange, promissory note or order, &c. fraudulently 156 PROMISSORY NOTE : forgery of 154 making, &c. by procuration, fmudulently 156 "PROPERTY": interpretation. of 24 demanding by letter, &c. property by menaces 49 demanding, with intent to steal : 50 PROPERTY LOST : as to stealing 26 PUBLIC COMPANY: directors of, fraudulently applying property of 72 keeping false accounts 73 director, manager, &c. making fraudulent statements .„ 73 PUBLIC FUNDS: making false entries in books 142 PUBLIC OFFICE: stealing, &c. any documents of 43 PUBLIC OFFICER OF COMPANY: destroying, &c. books 73 making fraudulent statements 73 PUBLIC SERVANT : larceny by 62 embezzlement by 63 496 Iridex. PUNISHMENT {see the various heads) : for simple larceny ix^ye 27 solitary confinement 27 whipping ... ... 27 of simple larceny after previous conviction of an indictable misdemeanor under the act 29 QUAETEK SESSIONS : certain frauds not triable at "^ appeal to, upon a summary conviction under the Larceny Act 89 appeals to, under the Malicious Injuries Act 1^2 convictions under, to be returned to ... ... 134 justices at, to grant certificate of approval of Prisoners Aid Societies 241 or revoke same 242 QUAY: stealing from S7 injuring any 115 injuring any piles, &c. of 116 BABBITS : kilUng, &c. in a warren by night or by day 34 BAIL: stealing or injuring ... 45 EAILWAT: unlawfully and maliciously placing, &e. anything upon, with intent to obstruct, &c 118 taking up, iJSec. any sleeper, &c 118 turning, &c. any points, &c. 118 signal altering 118 doing anything to obstruct, &c 118 obstructing by negligence 118 throwing upon Or across, any wood, stone, &c. with intent to endanger the safety of any person thereon 210 taking of, removing or displacing any rail, sleeper, &c. with intent, &c. 210 turning, moving, or directing any points, &o. with intent, &c. 210 showing, hiding," or removing any signal, &c. upon or near any railway, with intent, &c 210 doing any act, with intent, &c. ... 210 throwing, &c. at any engine, tender, carriage, &e. any wood, stone, &c. with intent to injure or endanger the safety of any person thereon 210 doing any unlawful act, or omitting or neglecting some act to the danger of the safety of persons on a railway ... 211 EAILWAT BUILDINGS : setting fire to 101 EAM: stealing 3X EAPB: punishment for 218 procuring the defilement of a girl "^ 219 carnally knowing a girl under ten years of age ... ]" 219 carnally knowing a girl between ten and twelve years of age 219 attempting to committhe two last offences 220 Index. 497 RECENT POSSESSION: presumption arising from page 25 EEOEIVEBS : separate receivers may be included in the same indictment in the absence of the principal 81 on an indictment for joint receiving, persons may be con- victed of separately receiving 81 receiving, where the principal has been guilty of a misde- meanor 81 where receivers triable 82 receivers, where the original ofience is punishable on sum- mary conviction 82 EEOEIVING STOLEN GOODS : the offence of 79 EEOORD : stealing, &c. 42 EEOOED, OOUET OP : stealing any document of 42 BEPOEMATOET SCHOOLS ACT, 1866: provisions of 326-348 EEGISTBR OF BIETHS : destroying, &c. or forging 162 inserting false entries 163 EEGISTEE OF DEATHS : destroying, &c. or forging 162 inserting false entries 163 BEGISTER OF MABBIAGBS : destroying, &c. or forging 162 inserting false entries 163 EEGISTET OF DEEDS: forgery of matter connected with 159 BELIEF TO PBISONEES: as to, on discharge 241, 242 EEPEAL : of criminal statutes 6 BEQUEST FOE PAYMENT OF MONEY, &c. : forgery of ..< 155 EBSEEVOIE: damaging or destroying any bank, drain, or wall of ... 115 injuring any piles, &c. of 116 EESTITUTION: as to, of stolen property 83 EETUEN: stealing, &c. 42 EEWAED : taking, for helping to the recovery of stolen property ... 84 advertising for the return of 84 EIGHT, CLAIM OF : as to, upon an information ... ... _ ... 38 with reference to charges of malicious mischief 127 498 Index. KIOTEES: ... demolishing, &o. buildings, &p.. i«^« |"* injuring building, &c. ... ^^ RIVER: damaging or destroying any bank, dam, or wall of |J-0 injuring any piles, &o. of 4 ^"^ RIVER, NAVIGABLE: stealing from vessels on "' ROBBERY: from the person ■•■ •■• *° on trial or, may be convicted of an assault with intent to rob 48 with offensive weapon ^^ by two or more persons ™ beating at the time of ^ ROOT : stealing, damaging, &c ^ RULE: stealing, Ac ^° SACRILEGE: breaking and entering a church, chapel, or meeting-house ... 52 SAPLING : stealing, damaging, &c ■■■ 44 as to malicious mischief to, when no punishment provided 127 schedule of repealed statutes ... ... ... 8 SCHOOL-HOUSE: breaking into or out of 54 SCHOOLS, INDUSTRIAL: provisions of Industrial Schools Act, 1866 349-373 SCHOOLS, REFORMATORY : provisions of Reformatory Schools Act, 1866 326-348 SEA BANK: damaging or destroying „ 115 injuring any piles, &c. of 116 SEAMAN : . assault upon to obstruct him in his calling 214 SEA MARKS : removing or destroying 124 SEA WALL: damaging or destroying ... ' 115 injuring any piles, &c. of 116 SEARCH WARRANT : when justice may grant it ... ... 85 to search for articles intended to be used for committing malicious mischief ... 127 when it may be granted to search for instruments used in forgery 168 SEIZURE OP COUNTERFEIT COIN: as to 188 SELLING OR BUYING COUNTERFEIT COIN : the offence of I77 Index. 499 SERVANT: larceny by page 59 embezzlement by ... 60 larceny by public servant 62 misappropriation by, of master's property in certain cases 306-310 criminal treatment of , by master or mistress 207 SHEEP : stealing 31 SHIPS: stealing from 57 setting Are to, casting away, or destroying any 122 attempting to do so ... ~ 122 placing near to, gunpowder with intent to damage 123 damaging otherwise than by Are 123 destroying, &o. any part of, when in distress 124 sending letter threatening to destroy 125 setting fire to or casting away with intent to murder ... 202 SHIPWRECK: stealing from 57 having property of, in possession 58 offering such property for sale 58 impeding a person endeavouring to save his life from ... 203 SHIPPING ACT (MERCHANT): offences against 245-247 SHOOT : attempting to, with intent to mnrder 202 with intent to do grievious bodily harm 204 attempting to, with intent to do grievous bodily harm ... 204 SHOP: breaking into or out of 64 setting fire to 101 SHRUB : steaHng, damaging, &e. 44 damaging, &o. to the amount of Is 110 destroying or injuring, growing in any park, garden, &o. exceeding \l. 110 if exceeding bl. 110 as to malicious mischief to, when no punishment provided ... 127 SIGNALS: exhibiting false 123 SIGN MANUAL': forgery of 139 SIGNATURE : of a witness to any deed, &c. forgery of 153 SIX MONTHS : as to charging three larcenies within six months 28 as to proving three takings within six months on a charge of a single taking ■ 28 SKIN : killing animals with intent to steal the skin 31 500 Index. SLUICE : injuring any i'Off^ 115 injuring any piles, &c. of • H^ SMALL PENALTIES ACT (28 & 29 Vict. i;. 127) : proviaions of 321-323 SODOMY: the offence of ,. 227 attempts to commit ••• 227 carnal knowledge, proof of 227 SOLITARY CONFINEMENT: as to, under Larceny Act 97 as to, under Malicious Injuries Act 137 punishment of, under Forgery Act 173 in coin prosecutions 19^ for offences against the Offences against the Person Act ... 230 SPECIAL SESSIONS : for settling jury lists 297 SPRING GUNS : as to setting 209 STABLE: setting fire to 101 STATION: setting fire to 101 STATUTES : repeal of 6 STILE : destroying or injuring 113 STOCK: forging or putting off forged transfer of 140 personating owner of 141 STOLEN GOODS, see "Receiving Stolen Goods." STOLEN PROPERTY: any person to whom it is offered may seize the party offer- ing it 85 STORES, NAVAL AND VICTUALLING: offences against the Act for Protecting 247-260 STORES, NAVAL: offences under the Naval Stores Act, 1867 383-389 STRANGLE : attempts to strangle, with intent, &c 205 STUPEFYING DRUG: causing to be taken, with intent, &o 205 attempting to use 205 SUFFOCATE : attempts to suffocate, with intent, &c 205 SUMMARY CONVICTION: mode of compelling the appearance of persons punishable on summary conviction gg upon non-payment of penalty party may be committed '.'.'. 87 party may be discharged in certain cases "\ 87 Index. 501 SUMMAEY CONVICTION (coniCTwrf): a bar to any other proceeding page 87 proceedings upon, upon a charge under the Malicious Inju- ries Act ... ... , 130, 131 as to discharging prisoner upon making amends under the Malicious Injuries Act 132 a conviction a bar to other proceedings 132 SUMMAEY CONVICTIONS, see the various heads. SCTMMART PROCEEDINGS: to be under 11 ,S 12 Vict c. 43 98 to be, in England, under the 11 & 12 Vict, c 43, and in Ireland under the 14 & 15 Vict. o. 93, in charges under the Mali- cious Injuries Act 137 SUPERANNUATION : forfeiture of on conviction for treason or felony ■■• ...433 SURETIES : when to be required under Larceny Act ... 96 when they may be required upon conviction under the Mali- cious Injuries to Property Act 136 for offences against the Offences against the Person Act ... 231 SURETIES TO KEEP THE PEACE : in coin prosecutions 195 TELEGRAPH, ELECTRIC: offences, as to 119 attempts 119 TENANT : maliciously injuring building 105 TENDER OP AMENDS : in actions under Coinage Act 192 TESTAMENT : forgery of 154 THREATENING LETTER, see " Letter, Threatening." THREATENING TO ACCUSE OF CRIME : with intent to extort 51 THREATS : inducing a person by, to execute deeds with intent to defraud 62 TITLE TO LAND : if it comes in question upon a charge of assault, justices no juiisdiction to hear 218 TITLE ACT, DECLARATION OF: offences against 274, 275 TOLL BAR : damaging 118 TOOLS FOR COINING: having in possession ... 186 conveying tools out of the Mint 187 TOWING PATH: injuring any 115 injuring any piles, &o, of Ho 502 Index. TRADE MAEKS : offences under the Merchandise Marks Act (25 & 26 Vict. 0. SS) i"»5'« 276-289 provisions as to i/o-^n^ TEANSPER: forging transfer of stock, &o ^^^ endeavouring to procure fraudulent transfer 141 TEANSPEE OP LAND ACT: provisions as to offences against 243 the act :. 243-245 TEBASON : forfeiture for 433-449 punishment for 448 TEEES: stealing, damaging, &o .— 4* suspected persons in possession of wood, &c. not satis- factorily accounting for it 45 damaging, &o. to the amount of Is HO destroying or Injuring, growing in any park, garden, &c. exceeding 11. HO if exceeding 52^ ■•• HO as to malicious mischief to, where no punishment provided,. , 127 "TRUSTEE": interpretation of 23 fraudulently disposing of property ... 72 sanction of judge or the Attorney-general before proceeding... 72 TUNNEL : injuring any 115 injuring any piles, &c. of 116 TUENPIKE-GATE : damaging 118 UNCONSCIOUSNESS: doing an act to cause, with Intent, &c. 205 UNDERTAKING FOR PAYMENT OP MONEY, &c. : forgery of ... 155 UNDERWOOD : stealing, damaging, &c 44 as to malicious mischief to, where no punishment provided.. 127 UNION ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE ACT: penalty under ... ... ... 294 UNNATURAL OPPENCE: as to ' 227 attempts to commit ... 227 UTTERING, tee "Poegery." UTTERING COUNTEEPEIT COIN : offence of uttering counterfeit gold or silver coin 179 offence of uttering, accompanied by possession of other counterfeit coin ... ... 179 offence of uttering, followed by a second uttering 179 VAGRANT ACT AMENDMENT ACT, 1868: provisions of 399 Index. 503 "VALUABLE SEOTJEITY": interpretation of page 23 stealing or deBtroying, &o. 40 sending letters demanding valuable security with menaces ... 49 demanding, with intent to steal 50 inducing by threats to execute, &e 52 VEGETABLE PEODU.qXION : stealing, damaging, &c 46 not growing in a garden, &c stealing, &c 47 setting fire to , 108 VEGETABLES : damaging, &c. growing in any orchard, &c Ill if elsewhere 112 VEHICLE: furious driving, whereby, &o 211 VENUE: in actions under Larceny Act 91 in aotioDS under the Malicious Injuries Act 135 in cases of uttering counterfeit coin 190 in actions under Coinage Act 191 VESSEL : stealing from 57 stealing from any vessel in distress, or wrecked 57 setting fire to, casting away, or destroying any 122 attempting to do so 122 placing gunpowder near with intent to damage 123 damaging otherwise than by fire 123 destroying, &c. any part of, when in distress 124 sending letter threatening to destroy 125 VIADUCT : damaging 117 VIOTUALLLNG STOEES ACT : offences against 247-260 WALL: destroying or injuring 113 of any river, &c. damaging or destroying 115 injuring any piles, &c. of 116 WAREHOUSE: breaking into or out of 54 setting fire to 101 WAEEANT : wheQ parties may be apprehended without 85 WAEEANT FOB PAYMENT OF MONET, &c. forgery of 165 WAEEANT OF ATTOENET: stealing, &c ^2 WAEEANT OF COMMITMENT : against a public servant for larceny or embezzlement ... 63 WATEECOUESEi injuring any ... llo - mjunng any piles, so. of iJ-o 504 Index. WBIK: ,,, ' injuring any P