flr}d Its > 1 1 1 V. J, G, BOURINOT p /03f a/ y7-7-»T:~- THE GIFT OF /^t?^,^...Q.^..^...../2L^ A:..SlZA.^.1 ^cjiohs.. F 1039C2°B77""'™"'*'"-"'"^ **''}mmm&&fS!SJiPV:i'.^ account of th 1 Clin 3 1924 028 897 663 Overs 'V@i '« Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028897663 HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE ACCOUNT OF THE ISLAND OF CAPE BRETON AND OF ITS MBMOEIALS OP THE FEBNCH El^GlMB: WITH BIBLIOGEAPHICAL, HISTOEICAL, AND CEITICAL NOTES By J. G. BOUEINOT, C.M.G., LL.D., D.C.L., PRESIDENT OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF CANADA, MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL OF THE AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ETC.; AUTHOR OF "PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE IN CANADA," "MANUAL OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY OF CANADA," " FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN CANADA," (JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY STUDIES), ETC. MONTEBAL : W. FOSTBE BEOWN & CO., ST. JAMES STEEET 1892 A,. S ZL5-% Entered according to Act of Parliament of Canada by J. G. Boubinot, in the Office of the Minister of Agriculture, in the year 1892. TO THE MEMORY OF MY FATHER WHO LOVED THE ISLAND WHERE HE LIVED FOR FIFTY YEARS UNTIL HIS DEATH. CAPE BRETON AND ITS MEMORIALS. PEEPATOEY NOTE. Since the beginning of the present century Cape Breton, once known as He Royale, has been to the world at large very little more than a mere geographical expression, and the importance which it possessed in the times when England and France were struggling for the supremacy in North America has been long since forgotten except by the students of history. In the present work it is the object of the writer, a native of Cape Breton, to record briefly the main facts in its history from the days of its discovery by European voyagers in the remote past down to the present time, when a stream of travel is already beginning to find its way to an island abounding with so many features of natural and historic interest. In the narrative of the days of the French regime, especially from 1*740 to lYSS, stress has been naturally laid on the important position He Eoyale once held with relation to New France and the old Thirteen Colonies. Maps and illustrations have been added to give completeness and clearness to the narrative. Many pages of critical and bibliographical notes are appended, with a view of relieving the main text of much historical matter chiefly interesting to the students of the past. In these notes there are references to all the literature which I have been able to find relating tothe history, resources and industries of this valuable and interesting section of the Dominion of Canada. CONTENTS. Section. Page. I. History of Cape Breton from its discovery until the Treaty of Utreclit in 1713 T II. Cape Breton as He Eoyale, and the foundation of I/ouisbourg 20 III. Government and state of Cape Breton during the Prench regime 29 IV. Origin and history of the New England expedition against Louisbourg 34 V. Siege and taking of Louisbourg in 1745 42 VI. Eeview of events from the restoration of Cape Breton to Prance in 1748 until the second siege, and taking of Louisbourg 58 VII. Siege and taking of Louisbourg in 1758 by Amherst and Boscawen 66 VIII. Cession of Cape Breton to England by the Treaty of Paris in 1763, and its subsequent history as an English possession ^ 78 IX. Some picturesque features of Cape Breton, and its memorials of the Pi-ench rdgime 89 X The Prench Acadians — their condition and prospects 101 XI. A short description of the port and the ruins of Louisbourg at the present time 109 6 CONTENTS. BiBLIOQEAPHIOAL, HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL NoTES. Appendix. I^agb. I. The voyages of the Northmen 1^^ II. The Cabot voyages 121 III. The Portuguese voyages 130 IV. Norembegue 130 V. Baccalaos on the old maps ••••• 131 VI. Cartography of Cape BretoB, 1527-1632 132 VII. Jacques Cartier off Cape Breton 133 VIII. Extracts from nai-ratives of early voyages to Cape Breton 131 IX. French sources of information on Cape Breton and Louisbourg 141 X. English works, memoirs, and general sources of information respecting Louisbourg, and the sieges of 1145 and 1758 146 XI. Maps and illustrations of Cape Breton and Louisbourg, portraits of Wolfe, etc 154 XII. Louisbourg medals 157 XIII. The Micmac Indians and their language 159 XIV. The Acadian French in Cape Breton 160 XV. General bibliographical notes , 162 XVI. Extracts from treaties and other official proclamations, etc., affecting Cape Breton 165 XVII. Official statement of the military establishment at Louisbourg in 1753 169 XVIII. Statistical statements of the fisheries and commerce of Cape Breton, 1745-1758 171 Maps and Illustrations. Part of Cabot's Mappemonde, 1544 9 Facsimile of Nicolas Denys's map, 1672, (Plate 5) — to face page 20 French medal struck on foundation of fortress of Louisbourg in 1720 25 Map of British colonies and northern New France, including Capo Breton, and indicating dates of the founding of principal forts in the French possessions, (Plate 1) — to face page 60 English medal struck on taking of Louisbourg in 1758 75 Admiral Sir Hovenden Walker's cross in Sydney harbour, 1711 110 Cross taken from the French parish church in 1745 and now over the entrance to Gore Hall, Harvard University 115 Old cannon, probably of sixteenth century, found at Louisbourg 116 Old sketch of entrance of Louisbourg harbour and of the French town in the distance 155 View of new village of Louisbourg. App. (Fig. 1 — Plate 2.) Sketch of ruins of old casemates at Louisbourg. App. (Fig. 2 — Plate 2.) Plan of the city and harbour of Louisbourg, indicating the position of New England forces in 1745. App. (Plate 3.) Plan of the city and fortifications of Louisbourg by E. Gridley. App. (Plate 4.) Errata. Page 19, line 8 — Omit [Race]. " 43, " 5— In note 2, for 1761 read 1751. " 63, " 4— Insert New before " England." " &6, " 4 — Prom foot of text for Abercrombie, read Ahefcromby. " 68, " 2— " " " insertafter the word earned, "upwards of 12,000 men besides." " 77, " 9 — For nine read eleven. " 80, " 3— From foot for Wallis DesBarres, read Wallet DesBarres. " 98, note 2 — For the Ulloas, read De Ulloa's Voyage. [ 7 1 1. The History of Cape Breton from its discovery until the Treaty of Utrecht in IV 13. "We have do title-deeds to house or lands Owners and occupants of earlier dates Fi-om graves forgotten stretch their dusty hands And hold in mortmain still their old estates.'' The words here quoted from the poet Longfellow have more than a poetic meaning to one who studies the nomenclature of Ihe island of Cape Breton in the light of the his- toric past. Not only the name of the island itself, but its bold headlands, its spacious bays, its broad estuaries and harbours, connect us in the present with those adventurous fishermen and mariners who explored its coasts and waters centuries ago. Basques, Bretons, Normans, Portuguese and Spaniards have made an impress on its geography which its continuous English occupation for a hundred and thirty years has failed to remove. Traditions of Norse voyagers hover around its shores, and we are carried into a realm of mist and shadow when we endeavour to solve the secrets of its past It is quite probable that Biarne Heriulfsson, a son of one of the Icelandic settlers of Greenland, found himself off the coast of Cape Breton during his voyage of 986, when, attempting to join his father in his new home, he lost his course and was tossed by adverse winds into unknown waters where he saw a land, which appeared from the sea fiat and covered with trees, and may have been some part of the southern coast of Cape Breton which presents features very different from those of the northeastern and northwestern coasts, so remarkable for their lofty headlands and mountains. Fourteen years later Leif Ericsson, a son of Eric the Red, an Icelandic jarl, who was the first coloniser of Grreenland, made a voyage to find the lands of which Biarne had brought home vague reports. Learned writers have devoted themselves with much enthusiasm to the study of the sagas which are now generally admitted to show internal evidence that the brave adventurers of the north of Europe have a strong claim to the honour of having first visited the continent of America. But while these writers have given us ground for believing in the anti- quity and authenticity of the sagas, they have not yet succeeded in satisfactorily solving the mysteries of these old manuscripts of the north and identifying beyond dispute the countries and places to which the Northmen gave a name. Labrador answers in a measure to the description of the dreary land which all the way from the sea as far as snowy' mountains in the distance appeared one field of snow, and which the voyagers called Hellu- land on account of the "flat stones which they saw in that country of no advantages." The vague description given of Markland, or forest-clad land, to which Leif came next, — a relatively level country, covered with trees, and having white sandy beaches — applies to 8 CAPE BEETON AND ITS MEMOEIALS. many parts of the soiithern coast of Cape Breton and Nova Scotia, from the low island of Scatari, to Halifax harbour and even as far west as Cape Sable, when sighted by sailors in a passing ship. One learned searcher ' into American antiquities, while exercising his ingenuity to trace the route of the Norse voyagers, ventures to go so far as to express the opinion— a dreadful heresy no doubt to some American scholars — that Cape Breton was the northern part of that Vinland to which Leif came at last, and where he and his companions made a temporary settlement. So far it must be admitted that the most thorough investigation made into this subject hardly bears out such a conclusion, but rather points to Cape Breton having been comprised in the indefinite description given of Markland,^ and to some part of New England having been the land of vines and of sweet honey-dew, of which the travellers told such pleasant tales on their return to G-reenland. A curious mound, or some rock with mysterious marks, a deep bay resembling the gloomy fiords of the Scandinavian lands, low sandy shores, or snow-capped hills, are all so many texts on which to build theories, and write elaborate treatises to connect the present with the story of the sagas ; and one often rises thoroughly perplexed from the perusal of these laboured disquisitions of some of the students of times so enshrouded in mist. Be that as it may, the northern adventurers have left no memorials of their voyages on the shores of Cape Breton, and the historian in these days must be content with the conjecture that they were the first of European voyagers to see the eastern portions of the wide expanse of territory now known as the Dominion of Canada. Neither does history record the exact time when the adventurous Basque and Breton fishermen first fished in the Gulf of Saint Lawrence and anchored their clumsy vessels in the bays and harbours of the island which there is some reason to believe they visited even before the voyages of the Cabots to the continent of America. It is not often that we find evidence more conclusive iu support of early exploration than that which connects the name of Baccalaos, the Basque for cod, with the countries in the gulf where that fish is found in such abundance. It requires little or no imagination to suppose that these brave Basque fishermen and sailors who, from time immemorial, have made their home on the deep, should, at last, have found their way to the waters of eastern America. We see the name of Baccalaos in the oldest maps of the sixteenth century, and it is claimed that the Cabots heard the name among the Indians of the lands which they visited at the close of the fifteenth century.^ In all probability the Cabots, John and Sebastian, were among the first Europeans after Biarne and Leif Ericsson to coast along its shores. In a map of 1544, only dis- covered in G-ermany in 184-3, and attributed to Sebastian Cabot, but not accepted by all historians as authentic, the northeastern point of the mainland of North America, pre- sumably Cape North, is put down as "prima tierra vista ;" and there are not a few his- torical students who believe that this was actually the landfall seen by John Cabot in his first memorable voyage to this continent. In the controversy which has gone on for years as to the first land seen by Cabot and his son — whether the coast of Labrador, 1 Professor Gustav Storm, in the ' M^moires de la Soci6t6 Royale des Antiquaires du Nord ' for 1888. See Ann. I to this work, where references are given to various writers on the Northmen and their voyages. 2 "The more general opinion," says Fiske, " Discovery of America," i. 164, favours Cape Breton or Nova Scotia. ^ See App. V to this work for the origin of the name Baccalaos, and its extended and uncertain use in old maps of Eastern America. CAPE BEETON AND ITS MEMOEIALS. 9 or the northeastern cape of Oape Breton, or Oape Bonavista or some other headland on the eastern shores of Newfoundland— many pages of speculation and argument have been, and will probably continue to be advanced in support of these various theories ; and the reader who wishes to come to some definite conclusion on this vexed subject only rises from the study of these learned disquisitions with the feeling that a great mass of know- ledge has been devoted to very little purpose except that purpose be to leave the question still open, and give employment to learned antiquarians for all time to come. One may, however, easily arrive at the conclusion, after a perusal of these contradictory views of East coast of North America, from the Sebastian Cabot mappe monde, 1544. the Cabot voyages to Eastern America, that the claim of Oape North or of some other part of the eastern coast of Oape Breton to have been the landfall of Oabot— the prima tierra vista— is as strong as the claim of any part of Labrador or Newfoundland, to the same distinction. Indeed unless we are prepared to reject the map of 1544 as a fabri- cation—and certainly the evidence on the whole is to the contrary— we should give the island of Cape Breton the benefit of the doubt and believe that it was the first .land that 10 CAPE BEETON AND ITS MBMOEIALS. John Cabot and his son saw in America early in the morning towards the last of June — without doubt in 1497 — when they had made their way from Bristol to the unknown countries of the "West. The northern part of Cape Breton in many respects corresponds with the general features of the description given of the new land, of its inhabitants, of its animals, and of its fisheries, ia the legend or inscription' on the map in question— a legend which has also given rise to much speculation as to its authorship and authen- ticity, but which nevertheless must be taken into the account unless we ignore the docu- ment in its entirety. The people clothed in the skins of animals — that the voyagers saw on the shore — were probably the Micmacs who were a coast tribe, and must have fre- quented the northern parts of Cape Breton in considerable numbers in early times on account of the abundance of game. The great deer — cieuros muy grades como cauallos — were no doubt the moose which in great numbers roamed among the hilly fastnesses and fed on the barrens — the tierra muy steril — of northern Cape Breton until they have been in the course of time almost exterminated by reckless hunters. The advocates of the claim of Labrador argue that the mention of the appearance of white bears in this new found laud of Cabot is in favour of their contention, but it is not at all unlikely that these animals frequented the northern coast of Cape Breton in those early times when the island contained great numbers of wild creatures, many of which have entii-ely disappeared with the progress of settlement. It is a powerful fact in support of the Cape Breton theory that, in a work written by one Pichon on the island of Cape Breton two centuries and a half later than the Cabot voyages he tells us in his chapter on the natural features of the country that the bears of Cape Breton and of St. John are " much the same as those in Europe, and some of them are white " — a statement which is almost conclusive on the point at issue. ^ It is quite probable too, that the ice-floes that have always come down 1 In App. II to this work will be found the Spanish inscription on the supposed Sebastian Cabot mappe monde, but for the information of the reader tlie literal translation is given here : " No. 8. This land was dis- covered by John Cabot, a Venetian, and Sebastian Cabot, his son, in the year of the birth of Our Lord Jesus Christ, M.CCCC.XCIIII., on the 24tli of June in the morning, which country they called ' primd tierra vista;' and a large island over against the said land they named the island of St. John because they discovered it on the same day. The inhabitants wear skins of animals, use in their battles bows, arrows, lances, darts, wooden clubs and slings. The soil is very barren, and tliere are many white bears and stags as large as horses, and many other beasts ; likewise great quantities of fish, pike, salmon, soles as long as a yard, and many other sorts, besides a great abundance of the kind called baccalaos. There are also in the same land hawks as black as ravens, eagles, partridges, redpoles, and many other birds of various descriptions." M.CCCC.XCIIII. is an error, corrected by joining the first two letters after XC at the bottom, thus making a V, and M.CCCC.XCVII. Fiske, " Dis. of Am.," ii. 5, 10. ''■ White bears in early times were probably found in considerable numbers in the northeastern parts of Canada. Sagard, " Histoire du Canada et Voyages " (i. 147, ii. (582, ed. of 1866, Paris), tells us that in the time (1633-4) he wrote his work that "they inhabited not only the island of Anticosti, but also the country at the mouth of the St. Lawrence, which was frequented by very few Indians, but the places where they are generally found is among the high mountains and very cold countries." See also Champlain's works, Abb6 Laverdiere's ed., iv. 1088. The Montagnais Indians call the island " Natascoueh," which means the place where they take bears. Ih., i. 67, note by Abb6 Laverdiere. The mountainous, wild district of northern Cape Breton would most likely centuries ago be the most southerly limit of these animals. The fact that it is only on the northern parts of Labrador they are now seen, and hardly at all on the Atlantic sea-board of that dreary region, shows how their habitat has receded north in the course of several centuries since Cabot entered the Gulf Many animals that formerly existed in the Gulf have disappeared within a century or two. Dr. Patterson in a paper on the Magdalen Islands (' Trans, of the Nova Scotia Inst, of Science,' Jan. 1891), shows that the walrus which was once found in such numbers on their shores— a place is still called Vache de Marine— ia now practically extinct. The same animal was found on the southern shores of Cape Breton and on Sable Island. GAPE BEETON AND ITS MEMOEIALS. 11 the gulf even as late as June from the great icefields of the north, brought with them bears to the northern shores of Cape Breton in days when they were quite common enough from the entrance of the St. Lawrence to the Straits of Belle Isle and beyond. Much speculation has been indulged in whether Prince Edward Island was the island adjacent to the new found land and named St. John by Cabot in honour of the Saint on whose festival he discovered it. An argument, however, might be advanced in favour of the well-known cape, from which the island of Cape Breton derives its present name, having been actually the first landfall of Cabot in American waters. All the European sailors of old times naturally made for this easily reached landfall when they came to the Grulf, ' and eventually it became like Cape Eace, one of the most important land-marks in the waters of eastern America. Quite close to this noted cape, in fact adjacent to it and in this respect answering to the description in the legend, — una isla gr&,de que esta par la dha tierra — is the barren, triangular island of Scatari, which in form much more resembles the island given in the supposed mappe monde of Sebastian Cabot than does the present Prince Edward Island. But against this theory, which certainly has some arguments in its support, must be placed the fact that the position of Scatari, or in other words its rela- tion to Cape Breton, does not correspond to that given to St. John's Island on the map. As long as we accept the map as authentic, and its legends as entitled to credence, we must give the priority to Cape North and Prince Edward Island. ^ Without dwelling further on the point and perhaps adding to the perplexities of a sufficiently intricate subject, we may come to one conclusion in which all will agree, that the voyages of the Cabots commenced a new era in the history of North America. In the beginning of the sixteenth century the Portuguese discovered Labrador to which they gave a name, and probably explored a considerable portion of the coasts of Newfoundland, Cape Breton, and Nova Scotia, and there are even those who in their enthusiasm advance the theory that these European voyagers were the first to enter the Saint Lawrence f but whilst there is no doubt that they sailed through the straits of Belle Isle and visited parts of the gulf of Saint Lawrence, including Cape Breton, many years before Jacques Cartier found his way to the same waters, no mere speculation can diminish the fame of the latter as the discoverer of the noble country which must be always associated with the name of the bold sailor of Saint Malo. As the Cabots laid the foundation of the claim of England to a large portion of the North American continent from Cape Breton to Florida, so Cartier gave to France the valley of the Saint Lawrence, and prepared the way for the courageous ^ Sir Humphrey Gilbert, for instance ; see infra, sec. XI. ' See App. II to this work, where references are given to the principal authors who have made the Cabot voyages their special study, and have with more or less success worked out their respective theories. Dr.Kohl,inhis work on the Discovery of Maine ('Hist. Soc. Coll., Portland,' 1869), expresses the opinion that the " prima vista " of the Cabots " would not probably have been the northern point of Cape Breton but the small island of St. Paul near it which is generally the first land made by sailors entering the Gulf of St. Lawrence." On the con- trary, if "prima vista" was not the cape from which the island is named and generally the first point made in old times, it was most likely Cape North, and not St. Paul, which is ten miles distant in a direction quite opposite from the course clearly taken by John Cabot. After he sighted the northern head of the island, he made next for St. John island according to the inscription on the mappe monde. If he entered the southern entrance of the Gulf, he must have made either Scatari or Cape Breton or Cape North— certainly the evidence so far as it goes sustains the theory that his course took him to the latter point. » For an able statement of the Portuguese claim, see Rev. Dr. Patterson's paper in the ' Trans Hoy. Soc. of Can., (1890), vol. viii, sec. 2. Also, ' Magazine of American History ' for May, 1891. See App. Ill to this work. 12 OAPB BEETON AND ITS MEMOEIALS. Frenchman of Brouage who, a few decades later, made on the heights of Quebec the com- mencement of that dependency which France, in her ambition, hoped would develop until it could dominate the w^hole continent of North America. Though it is not likely now that the true course of the Cabots in their first voyage to eastern America and the actual locality of " Prima Yista " will ever be cleared up to the satisfaction of all students of history, there is no doubt whatever that Jacques Cartier, on his return from his second voyage in 1535-6 to Canada, discovered the passage to the Atlantic between Cape Breton and Newfoundland, and sighted the bold headlands and picturesque cliffs of the northern part of the former island. It is probable that he gave the name of Lorraine to the cape which in the course of two centuries has become Cape North, aptly called " the watch-tower of the gulf." ^ We are told in the accounts of his voyage that he saw another cape " towards the south," and gave it the name of St. Paul's, and although there is much difference of opinion as to its exact situation, the weight of authority goes to show that reference is made to a point on the eastern coast of the island to the south of Cape North, assuming the latter to be Cape Lorraine. It is not unlikely that Cartier saw in the distance the bold headland which in later times was Smoky Cape (Cap Enfume), on account of the cloud of mist which so often envelopes this storm-swept land- mark of the gulf ^ It does not appear, however, that Cartier ever landed on the coast of Cape Breton, and the statement that is found in some books that he built a fort and lived "one winter on the island has no foundation in fact. The same assertion has been made of his friend and patron, the Lord of Roberval, who was chosen by the King of France to settle the new country discovered by the sailor of St. Malo. It is now well established that Cape Breton was mistaken by some writers for Cap Eouge, near Quebec, where both Cartier and Roberval — the former in 1541, and the latter in 1542 — erected forts for the defence of the infant settlement.' We have abundant evidence to show that, during the greater part of the sixteenth century, French, Spanish and Portuguese fishermen probably frequented the coast of Cape Breton, but it was not until the close of that century that English vessels were found in any number engaged in the fisheries of the gulf. It is now claimed that Baron de L6ry's abortive effort of 1518 to establish a settlement was made at Cape Breton, and not at Sable Island, as generally supposed, but this is an entire mistake.* The Portuguese made an attempt in 1521 to settle a colony on the coast of Cape Breton, and the best authority at hand seems to point to the little bay of Inganiche, on the picturesque northeastern shore, as the site of the infant settlement, which Champlain tells us was very soon deserted on account of the rigorous and inclement climate."' But while Spaniard and Portuguese ventured into the bays and rivers of the island, and in all probability attempted to establish temporary posts for trading and fishing purposes, they have not given to Cape Breton the name it bears. The origin of this name is even a matter of controversy between those who claim the Basques or the Bretons to have been the discoverers of the island. Some claim that ' Judge Haliburton, in his " History of Nova Scotia," ii. 231. ^ See App. Vn to this worli:, where reasons are given at some length for the opinions set forth in the text. ■■ See App. VII (last paragraph) to this work. * Fiske (" Disc, of Am.," ii. 492, n) cites Le Tac, " Histoire chronologique de la Nouvelle France," but the refer- ences (pp. 40, 57) are unmistakably to Sable Island. * See App. VIII (4) to this work. CAPE BEETOK AND ITS MEMOETALS. 13 it was the Basque fishermen who first made the cape ^ on the eastern coast, and named it after a Cape Breton in that very Basque country which, in the earliest times of which there is any record, sent many adventurous sailors to Newfoundland and the G-ulf of St. Lawrence. On the other hand, it is urged that the name is only a memorial of the voy- ages of the Breton and Norman sailors and fishermen of Honfleur, Dieppe and St. Malo, who sailed in company to eastern America even before the days of Columbus.^ In sup- port of the Breton claim we find on the oldest maps of the sixteenth century that the cape is described as Cap de Bretton, Cap aux Bretons, Cavo de Bretonni, and the mainland, afterwards Acadie, as the Terre aux Bretons, or Terra de los Bretones, or Terra de Breto. In a Portuguese portolano map, the date of which is believed to be either 1514 or 1520, there is a country described in Portuguese as " the land discovered by the Bretons." On the authority of a " great French captain," supposed to be Jean Parmentier of Dieppe, whose narrative is credited to 1539, the Breton and Norman voyagers are described as having visited the waters of the Gulf of St. Lawrence as early as 1504, and given the well-known headland of the island its present name. The entrance of the gulf, between Cape Breton and Newfoundland, is described in Allefonsce's map of 1544-5 as " L'Entree des Bretons." In view of the vagueness of the Basque theory, which is chiefly supported by the fact of the existence of a Cape Breton on the southeastern coast of France, we can hardly fail to come to the conclusion that the Bretons gave to the cape the name it has always borne. Indeed we may well believe that the two capes in France and America owe their same name to these very adventurous mariners, who have from immemorial times hovered off the coasts or anchored in the harbours of the Bay of Biscay and of the Grulf of St. Lawrence as well. But while there is every reason to believe that the cape was named early in the six- teenth century, we have no authentic record of the exact date when the island itself was called after its most eastern headland. Leaving the realms of mere speculation, which only bewilders and never satisfies a practical historian, we must content ourselves with the fact that the name of Cape Breton has always clung to the island so long frequented by Basque and Breton fishermen. During the first forty years and later in the sixteenth century the name is found on old maps which have come down to us.^ It is given either to to the most eastern point of the mainland, a region described as Terre des Bretons or Terra de Breto, according to the nationality of the map-maker, or to a little island adjoining. It is interesting to note to how many makers of the old maps of the G-ulf of St. Lawrence the existence of an island occupying the present position of Cape Breton appears to have been ' "Cape Breton, better known to the mariners of the coast by the name of Port Novy Land, from the small adjacent islet of Puerto Nuevo, is the most eastern and also the lowest part of the coast. It is singular that this point, exposed to the continual fretting, dashing and ebullition of this peculiarly restless sea, and placed at the mercy of every storm that sweeps the Atlantic, should yet bear so little evidence of its power. The firm materials of its composition seem scarcely to have been worn by the effects of centuries ; and though so low, bold water forming its margin, instead of reefs of scattered rocks and other marks of ruin, is a proof of its unbroken strength.'' Haliburton, " History of Nova Scotia " (Halifax, N. S., 1829), ii. 213-214. Some call the island in question Porto Novo, which would indicate a Portuguese origin. ^ See App. VI (last paragraph) to this work. " See App. VI to this work, where a summary is given of the old maps on which Cape Breton as a cape or island is marked. Extracts are also given in App. VII and VIII from the accounts of the voyages of Cartier, Cham- plain, Bellinger (1583), Sylvester Wyett (1594), Charles Leigh (1597), Nicolas Denys (1672), in which mention is made of the island and the cape from which it was eventually named. 14 CAPE BEBTOlsr AND ITS MEMOEIALS. known. In a map of 1544-45 by Allefonsce, who accompanied Roberval to Canada as his pilot in 1641, and was the author of a well-known work on cosmography, the island of Cape Breton is roughly defined, and the entrance to the gulf, as I have previously stated, is distinguished as the Entree des Bretons. In the later map of Mercator, which shows a distinct advance in cartography and in the knowledge of these waters, evidence is given of the existence of a large island on the eastern coast, although the name itself is still only affixed to one of its capes. Year by year, however, as the maps of the sixteenth century clearly show, especially after Cartier's famous voyages, a knowledge of the coast lines of the eastern parts of North America was steadily growing, and from the coming of Champlain to this continent we must date the commencement of a new era in the colonization and the geography of America. His map of 1612, with all its defects, gives the most accurate description of the general features of Cape Breton which had appeared to that time. Although no name is given to the whole island, its leading natural charac- teristics, especially the great arm of the sea which nearly divides it into two parts, the large island on its southwestern coast, afterwards known as Isle Madame, English Har- bour, now Louisbourg, Inganiche and its northern cape, Saint Loran, now probably Cape North, are delineated with some degree of correctness. The Strait of Canseau is defined, but it is distinguished in a note as the Passage du Glas, whilst Canseau, from which it subsequently took its name, is accurately placed on the southeastern shore of Acadie or Nova Scotia. In Champlain's later map of 1632 the general features of the island are bet- ter still defined than in the former case, and the Strait of Canseau is given the name which it has generally borne, while the rocky islet of St Paul,which was incorrectly placed in 1612, begins to find its proper geographical position. But even on this later map the island is not given the general name of Cape Breton, though the present Prince Edward Island is called St. Jean. In fact, it is not clear when the name of Cape Breton was given by geographers to the whole island. As previously stated, the name of the land of the Bretons was for many years, in the oldest maps, given to a large ill-defined country which was afterwards known as Acadie. In L'Escarbot's map of 1609, which is by no means so accurate as Champlain's of three years' later, the island is described as Bacaillos, the Basque term which was indifferently applied during the previous hundred years to New- foundland and Labrador and the countries generally on the gulf where the cod is most plentiful, and which in these later times has disappeared from those lands and now clings only to an islet off Conception Bay, latitude 48° 6", and to a cape on the western coast of Nova Scotia.^ Champlain, writing in 1603, calls Cape Breton the island of Saint Laurent, " where," he adds, " is le cap Breton and where a nation of savages called the Sourequois [Micmacs] pass the winter." In his account of his later voyages, however, he writes of the island of Cape Breton {tie du cap Breton). It would seem that the name was not well established for some time, but that it gradually became the custom to apply the name of the cape to the island itself. "We see that is the case in the accounts given, of two voyages made by two English vessels in 1594 and 159*7, in which there is a distinct refer- ence made to the " Island of Cape Breton." A French writer^ of later times tells us that the island was " first of all called the Isle du Cap,'' and afterwards the English Harbour," ^ See 4.pp. V to this work. ' Pichon alias Tyrell, author of a memoir of Cape Breton. See App. IX to this work, where the curious his- tory of this erratic person is briefly told. ^ In Herman Moll's Atlas (London, 1715-20) Cape Breton is called Gaspey Island. See map 4 showing north parts of America claimed by France. CAPE BEETON AND ITS MEMOEIALS. IS the last being the old name of Louisbourg, which, in Champlain's time and many years later, was the favourite resort of English fishermen. It was in the reign of Elizabeth that Englishmen began to show that spirit of maritime enterprise which was afterwards to have such remarkable results in later times by the establishment of the greatest colonial empire which the world has ever seen. In the course of the sixteenth century, when the rich fisheries of Newfoundland and the islands of the G-ulf of St. Lawrence became known throughout Europe, English fishermen ventured into the waters which had long been the resort of the vessels of France, Portugal and Spain, and by the beginning of the seventeenth century there were probably over two hundred English craft of various sizes engaged in this great ihdustry. Louisbourg, easy of access from the ocean, invited the English, at an early date, to make it their port of call. The Spaniards preferred the pres- ent harbour of Sydney, which is even yet known as Spanish Eiver, and the French for many years sought shelter withia the safe haven of St. Anne's, embosomed in the hills of the northeastern coast of the island. The discoveries of Yerrazano in 1524 and of Jacques Oartier in 1535 gave France a claim to Acadie, Cape Breton and Canada. England's title came from the voyages of the Cabots. Sir Humphrey Gilbert, a relative of the bold and chivalrous Ealeigh, was the first Englishman of note who ventured, towards the close of the sixteenth century, to the shores of Newfoundland and took possession of the island in the name of Elizabeth, but his expedition had no other results than a barren assertion of a claim of sovereignty ' and his tragic death at sea on his return to Europe. The Marquis de la Roche, a little later in the same century, made an abortive attempt to establish a settlement in the new domain which France now began to claim in America, but his hopes perished in the relentless sands of Sable Island. It was not until the beginning of the seventeenth century that either France or England was able to make a permanent establishment in the new world. Ealeigh, above all other Englishmen of his time, saw that fame and fortune were to be won in America, but his first attempt to found a little colony in Carolina entirely failed, and the historian for centuries, since has speculated on the fate of the unhappy people who landed in 158*7 on Eoanoke Island.^ The attempts of Sieur Chauvin and Sieur Aymer de Ohastes to colonize New France were equally unfortunate, and the seventeenth century opened without a single European settlement on the whole coast of North America except the Spanish post of St. Augustine at the extreme point of the peninsula of Florida. At one time, indeed, it seemed as if the lilies of France would have floated over that soutfeern region and Protestants would have found in those times of oppression 1 Sir Humphrey Gilbert, on the 5th of August, 1583, in the harbour of St. John's, Newfoundland, " summoned the merchants and masters, both English and strangers [of the ships in port] to be present at his taking posses- sion of those countries. Before whom openly was read and interpreted unto the strangers his commission, by virtue whereof he tooke possession in the same harbour of St. John, and 200 leagues every way, invested the Queene's Majestie with the title and dignite thereof, had delivered unto him (after the custome of England) a rod and a turffe of the same soile, entring possession also for him, his heires and assignes for ever." See report of Mr. Edward Haies, gentleman, and principall actor in the same voyage," Hakluy t's Collection (Edmund Goldsmid's ed., Edinburgh, 1889), vol. xii, p. 337. Sir Humphrey does not appear to have entered any port or landed in Cape Breton, if indeed he ever made the stcoa. See infra, sec. XI, for a claim that one of his vessels was wrecked in Louisbourg harbour. 2 See an interesting paper, " The Lost Colony of Koanoke : its Fate and Survival," by Professor S. B. Weeks, in the Papers of the American Historical Association, 1891 ; also, in Mag. of Am. Hist, for Feb., 1891. 16 CAPE BEETON AND ITS MBMOEIALS. a refuge from the treachery and bigotry of kings and priests in Europe, but the Huguenot settlements of Eibaut and Laudonniere were soon destroyed by the greed and fanaticism of the false Spaniard, and, when a new century dawned, the Spanish flag was the only sign of European dominion from the Gulf of Mexico to the frozen regions of the north. During the first decade of the seventeenth century there happened three remarkable events in the history of the continent of America. In the western part of Nova Scotia, then Acadie or Oadie, on the banks of a beautiful basin where the tumultuous tides of the Bay of Fundy ebb and flow, we see a sleepy old town which recalls another world and another century. In the June days the air is redolent with the perfume of the apple-blossom and the hawthorn, the bells of ox-teams tinkle in the quiet streets, and the whole town bears the aspect of a dignified old age, which, having had its share of the world's excitement, now only asks to be left alone to spend the remainder of its years in placid ease. There it was, in the beginning of the seventeenth century, Sieur de Monts and his French compatriots laid the foundation of the old settlement of Port Royal, which was long the capital of Acadie and the beginning of the French regime in the great region of New France. Two years later, in 1607, a little colony of English ventured into Virginia, and although in these days the only A'estiges of that settlement are a few tombstones and grassy mounds, which are themselves rapidly disappearing beneath the encroachment of the tides, the site of Jamestown must ever be interesting to the historian and the states- man as the commencement of that remarkable experiment of colonization which has established a federal union of over sixty-four millions of people, distinguished for their energy, their enterprise, and their capacity for self-government. Only a year later, in 1608, Ohamplain, sailor, explorer and statesman, founded the colony of Canada on those picturesque heights on which, in the course of nearly three centuries, a city has grown, so remarkable for its natural beauty, its capacity for defence, and its memorials of the history of France in America. The first decade of the seventeenth century will ever be memorable for the found- ation of that " Old Dominion " which must receive honourable mention as the pioneer colony in the plantations of English America, and for the genesis of that new Dominion which, two centuries and a half after the settlement of Quebec, was to stretch between two oceans, and comprise an area of territory almost as great as that of the nation which was born at Jamestown in IGOT. Port Eoyal, known in later times as Annapolis, in honour of a not very brilliant English queen, is therefore the first permanent settlement made by Europeans between Florida and the Arctic regions. Nova Scotia and Cape Breton have the oldest history of any part of the Dominion of Canada ; ^ for there is little doubt that their shores were visited by the Norsemen, the Basques and Bretons, the Cabots and the Portuguese in the course of those adventurous voyages whose dim traditions and uncertain records have long per- plexed, and must continue to perplex, the students of the ancient annals and cartography of this continent. Indeed there much reason for the theory, to which I have previously referred, that John Cabot first made one of the capes of the island ; but without dwellin"- again on this vexed question, it is sufficient to know that Cape Breton and Acadie or 1 " As early as 1504 the fishermen of these latter people [Bretons and Normans] seem to have been on the northern coasts, and we owe to them the name of Cape Breton, which is thought to be the oldest French name in our American geography." Justin Winsor, " Christopher Columbus," p. 555. CAPE BKETON AND ITS MBMOEIALS. 17 Cadie, included in the mysterious regions of Norumbega or Norembeque, or Arambec,' or Terra des Bretons, were visited by Europeans long before the valley of the St. Lawrence was discovered by the Breton sailor. Indeed it is contended that the first attempt at European settlement in Canada was on the island of Cape Breton— at St. Peter's or Inganiche ; but we need not dwell on this interesting suggestion of the antiquarian, except to say that the Portuguese had no influence whatever on the colonization of the eastern provinces of Canada, and the old town of Annapolis may always point with pride to its grassy hillocks and willow-stumps as so many relics of the days of the French regime. It is in the letters-patent and commission given in 1603 by Henry IV of France and Navarre to Sieur de Mouts that we find the first mention of Acadie, which is also described as Cadie, obviously a Micmac or Souriquois affix used in connection with other words to describe the natural characteristics of a place or locality (akade). For instance, Numach- wakado is a place where fish is plentiful ; AnagwakSde is White Point ; Segubunakade or ShubenacMie is the place where a root known as the ground nut or Indian potato grows ; and so on with any number of places in the old home of the Micmac Indians.^ The royal papers just mentioned give the French a jurisdiction over " the whole coast of Acadie, the lands of Cape Breton (du Cap Breton), the bays of St. Clair and Chaleurs, the islands of Perc6, Gaspey, Mettan [Matane], Tadousac and the river of Canada." Cape Breton, which is not definitely mentioned as an island, but is called after its cape, long remained in obscurity, and it is Port Eoyal that alone for many years attracted the atten- tion of the historian. The record of this little post in the Bay of Fundy is the record of a never ending conflict between the English and the French for the dominion of Acadie. According as the New England colonies increased in population, the French possess- ion of Acadie was regarded by them as a constant menace, and all their efforts were, time and again, for more than a century, directed towards driving the French from the country. After the foundation of Quebec by Champlain, Canada became the favourite colony of France, and Acadie obtained a very small degree of recognition from the parent state. At no time, indeed, in her history did she evoke that interest and attention from the French king and people that would have enabled the struggling colonists eventually to hold their own against the energetic and sturdy New Englanders. In 1613 Port Royal surrendered to an English adventurer named Captain Argall, and Acadie remained in the possession of England until the treaty of St. Germain-en-Laye, when it was restored to France with all the countries and places which Great Britain held in New France. "While Acadie was occupied by England, a Scotch gentleman. Sir "William Alexander, afterwards the Earl of Stirling, obtained a grant from King James of the country which was now called Nova Scotia, as well as of New Brunswick and St. John's Island, of a part of Lower Canada and also of Cape Breton, which was called Baccalaos in his patent ; an indication that the present name was not yet generally recognized in Europe. This patent is chiefly interesting to us from the fact that it ga^ve him the right to establish settlements within his grant, to which was appended the title of baronet. In these prosaic, practical days, when everything is brought — too much so in some cases — to the test of commercial value, ^ See infra, sec. IX, and App. IV, for references to a probable survival of this curious name on the south- eastern coast of Cape Breton, in the immediate vicinity of Louisbourg. 2 See App. XIII to this work for a list of Indian compouad words in support of the assertion in the text. 3 18 CAPE BEBTON AND ITS MEMOEIALS. we recall with some amusement the efforts of men in times, when the virgin forest held the mastery in America, to reproduce the titles and trappings of the old world and create a new noblesse to gratify the cravings of ambition which could not be satisfied in Europe. On the banks of the St. Lawrence, seigniors held estates of princely magnitude and imitated the feudal customs of their old homes across the sea. On the Hudson, patroons assumed the dignity of great manorial lords, and in South Carolina an English philo- sopher attempted to create grandees under the high-sounding names of lords-palatiue, landgraves and caciques. Even in the little island of Prince Edward, when it had passed away from its first French proprietors. Englishmen had their ambition to become lords paramount, manorial lords and barons.' In Acadie, the dignity which was to be attached to grants of land for the encouragement of settlement never took root, and though the title has been long retained in Scottish families as a purely honorary distinction, it has never had since the days of Stirling any connection with the province from which it was named more than two hundred and sixty years ago.^ One of the persons who obtained such a right was Lord Ochiltree, who built a fort in 1629 at Baleine, a small port to the northeast of Louisbourg, with the object of colon- izing that section of Cape Breton, but he was very soon forced to leave the place by a number of Frenchmen under the leadership of a Captain Daniel, who claimed that the Scotch nobleman was a trespasser on the territory of France. After destroying the Eng- lish post, the same Captain Daniel built a fort and commenced a settlement at St. Anne's,' then called Great Cibou,* by the savages. This first attempt to found a French colony on the northeastern coast of Cape Breton was unsuccessful after a few years of struggle. The Jesuit mission, which is said to have existed there in 1634, was withdrawn and the settlement almost deserted two or three years later, when an energetic Frenchman came to the island and established a post in the same place to carry on the fisheries. The history of Acadie from 1632 to 1713, when it became a permanent possession of England, is one of a never-ceasing contest between the rival chiefs. La Tour and Char- nisay, for the supremacy in the country where both of them claimed to have rights. New Scotland, in those days, in fact, was the scene of such feuds as kept rival chieftains for centuries in a state of constant warfare amid the glens and mountains of old Scotland. In Cape Breton an enterprising Frenchman of the name of Nicholas Denys, Sieur de Fron- sac, a native of Tours, attempted to establish himself at St. Peter's, on the isthmus between the sea and the Bras d'Or lake, on the southwestern extremity of the island. For many years he also built trading posts of some importance at St. Anne's on the eastern coast of Cape Breton, at Chedabouctou Bay (now Guysboro), and at Miscou on the coast of New Brunswick ; but he, too, suffered from the greed and lawlessness of rivals. It was easy enough, in those times, to obtain grants of land and the right to trade in those countries from the authorities in France, who knew nothing of the geography of the new ' See Campbell's "History of Prince Edward Island" (Cliarlottetown, 1875) 20-12; Bourinot, " Local Govern- ment in Canada," Johns Hopkins "Un. Studies," Baltimore, 1887. ^ Murdoch's "History of Nova Scotia" (i. 68-69) gives a description of the insignia of the order. " Ferland, "Cours d'Histoire du Canada," i. 259. This historian (i. 238) falls into the error of confusing Lord Ochiltree's fort at Baleine with the one which Daniel subsequently built at St. Anne's. Murdoch, in his " History of Nova Scotia," (i. 72) also makes the mistake of placing Ochiltree's fort at St. Anne's. See Brown, '' History of Cape Breton," pp. 74-84 ; Champlain, iv. 1283-8. * See infra, sec. IX, for meaning of this Micmac word. CAPE BEETON AND ITS MEMOEIALS. 19 world, and took little or no pains to ascertain whether they might not interfere with pre- vious charters. One Le Borgne, who was a creditor of Charnisay, the former rival of La Tovir and governor of Acadie, professed to have obtained authority from the parliament of Paris to take possession of all his debtor's property in the colony. He claimed that Denys was an intruder on the domain over which Charnisay had lordship, and in a most high-handed manner took possession of all the property owned by the former at St. Peter's. On appealing to France, Denys obtained a patent in 1654 from the king, appointing him governor of the extensive country extending from Cape Cau9eau to Cape Eosiers [Race], Newfoundland, Cape Breton, St. John and other adjacent islands. Hardly had he obtained this redress from the authorities in France, to whom he at once appealed, than he found himself harassed by the lawless conduct of another commercial rival named Giraudiere, who claimed to have received from the Company of New France a grant of the coast in Acadie, which included Denys's concession and fort at Gruysboro'. The Canadian Com- pany subsequently repudiated Griraudiere's acts and revoked their grant to him, but Denys received no compensation for the losses which he suffered at Chedabouctou from his rival's treachery and falsehood. He was compelled to give up his post in Acadie, and to retire to Cape Breton, but even here his misfortunes followed him. At last, when his fort at St. Pierre was destroyed by fire, he retired altogether from the island to the Bay of Chaleurs, probably before 1669, and is believed to haA^e returned to France either in 16*71 or 1672, disheartened and worn out by his struggles in America.^ "Whilst in his native country, Denys published the first book which refers at any length to Cape Breton since its discovery, and gives us some interesting information respecting the natural features of those parts of the island with which he was best ' Mr. Hannay, in his history of Acadie, gives a well-written account of this memorable feud which lasted for many years in the early days of Nova Scotia, but he appears to have fallen into some slight errors with respect to Denys and his diflSculties with Le Borgne. He tells us (p. 187) that Charnisay broke up Denys's establishment in Cape Breton, whereas it was Le Borgne who laid claim to all the former's rights in Acadie as slated above. AVhen Denys first carae to Acadie he established a shore fishery at Rossignol (Liverpool) in partnership with De Eazilly, then living at La Have, and a merchant of Auray, in Bretagne (Murdoch, Hist, of N. S., i. 87 ; Denys, Am^rique Septentrionale, i. 86). On account of the loss of his principal vessel he appears to have left Rossignol and estab- lished himself in the vicinity of Eazilly 's fort with the intention of carrying on a lumbering business, but on the deatli of Eazilly, Charnisay obtained a transfer in his favour of all the latter's estates (Murdoch, i. 96) and forced Denys to abandon his enterprise in disgust (Denys, i. 94-104). Denys then established himself in Cape Breton, and after eome time was attacked by Le Borgne. Hannay also informs tis (p. 194) that the latter destroyed Denys's establishment at La Have in Nova Scotia, but this does not seem accurate. It appears that after Denys went to Cape Breton Charnisay or D'Aulnay, as he is indifferently called, removed the inhabitants of La Have to Port Eoyal, and according to a French Canadian historian they were the beginning of the French Acadian race (Ferland, i. 351, n. ; Murdoch, i. 103, 114; Denys, 4). La Have, it seems, was again settled after Charnisay had removed the original inhabitants, and Le Borgne's party, after their attack on Denys in Cape Breton, and on their way to Port Eoyal with him as a prisoner, destroyed the houses, not because Denys had any claim to them, but apparently because Le Borgne did not recognize the right of the new people to occupy the place. (Murdoch, i. 125 ; Denys, i. 6.) Subsequently Denys obtained his liberty and acknowledgments of his rights, while Le Borgne's son took possession of La Have and constructed a fort of timber for the purpose of carrying on business at that point {Ibid, i. 10). The letters-patent of 1654, defining Denys's limit of government (Brown, 92, Quebec Doc, i. 141) speak of Charnjpay having expelled him from his -forts, but this must be a mistake for Le Borgne or a refer- ence to Charnisay having driven Denys from La Have. Denys, however, is remarkably obscure in narrating even the facts of his own history, and it is easy to understand why Brown, Hannay and others are often perplexed and misled. I have endeavoured to study out the facts with the results as I have given them above— hesitatingly, I admit. 20 CAPE BEETON AND ITS MBMOEIALS. acqxiainted.^ But whenever he takes up subjects of which he has no personal knowledge, his statements are very perplexing on account of their vagueness. "We can see through- out the book, however, that he had much confidence in the capabilities of the island, and deeply regretted that his misfortunes had prevented him from carrying on the enterprises which he had in view for its settlement and development. During his residence in Cape Breton, he tilled not onl3 the land around his post at St. Pierre, but had a fine settlement at St. Anne's, where he cultivated even fruit successfully. Consequently he was able to write with some knowledge of the resources of Cape Breton. His departure was a serious blow to the island, which remained for years neglected by his countrymen. Not a single Euro- pean settlement was made within its limits until the first years of the eighteenth century, while the total population of Acadie itself did not reach a thousand souls, including the little garrison at Port Eoyal. Denys appears to have been in Quebec in 16*79, for there is documentary evidence^ to show that he was blind at that time and was pressing his claims for consideration on the government and asking an appointment of master of forests for his son, very likely the father of that M. de la Ronde Denys, whose name sometimes occurs in the later records of the island when Louisbourg was founded and Isle Royale became at last a valued possession of France.' II. Cape Bbeton as Ile Eoyale, and the foundation oe Louisbourg. During the seventeenth century it was a question whether Acadie was destined to be an English or a French colony. At times the red cross of England, and at others the Bourbon lilies were raised over the little fort at Port Royal, and it was not until the victories of Marlborough had humbled the pride of the great monarch, and crushed the armies of France at Blenheim, Ramilies and Oudenarde, that the country now known as Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, passed forever into the possession of England. The treaty of Utrecht^ was the first check given to France in her designs to colonize America ^ See App. IX (first paragraph) to this work, for a bibliographical notice of this very rare book. I give also, in App. VIII, a translation of the chapter referring to the island specially, as it has never before been printed in English. It shows that Denys had only a superficial acquaintance with the geographical and natural features of the island generally. His knowledge was confined to St. Peter's, the Labrador and the coast between Inganiche and Cape North. ' Quebec Documents, i. 273. ^ M. de la Eonde Denys, grandson of the old governor, a captain of infantry, who took part in the settlement of Cape Breton in 1713, sent a description in that year to the French minister having charge of the colonies, in which he calls St. Anne's the finest harbour in the world, and presses its advantages over any that Louisbourg could ofier as the chief port and fortified place. "My devoted grandfather," he wrote, "had a fort there, the remains of which are yet to be seen, and the Indians tell us that he raised the finest grain there and we have likewise seen the fields which he used to till ; and there are to be seen in the place very fine apple frees, from which we have eaten very good fruit for the season We see by experience, my lord, that New England, which is not worth a tenth part of Cape Breton, h.jw that colony flourishes ; for I know of certain knowledge that there are builtinthecouniy of Boston, every year, more than 1500 vessels, from 15 tons up to 800 tons burthen. One sees that there is nothing to hinder us doing the same thing. We are deficient in nothing required." It is quite true that when we look at Cape Breton, with its unrivalled situation for the successful prosecution of the fisheries, its remarkable mines of bituminous coal, and its relation to the rest of the continent, we can well believe that its natural advantages are far superior to those of the New England States ; but its want of wealth, capital and enter- prise and of connection for many years with a great and prosperous country like that to the back of New England, have kept the island always in a very inferior position until the present, when its prospects at last seem brighter. * For text of this treaty so far as it relates to Cape Breton, see App. XVI to this work. Trans. E. S. C, 1891. 5o HI +8 +7 ♦61 +? ++ +3 Map of Acadie and Cape Breton, by Governor Denys, 1672. Sec. II. Plate V. T.Lt^ffrtJe J-"" Pierre. 'SZ-Ckiljlcf Michiiu . "J Ci*jfRou^er«ttrre lit ucHt^pt^jaae lie C,Mnp'4fau 3c Ju rrjtr'ju Sud . 5 ,- . Z. I >/<• J^luie^u . g.Le Lie dAI.atr-aJor . \^0 ir.-i'iy i.e^Iel^""'-"'^"' h !" ff 43 >^ '/■''' To illustrate Dr. J. G. Bourinot's Paper on Cape Breton. CAPE BEBTON AND TTS MEMOEIALS. 21 and the inauguration of that series of victories which ended at last in driving her entirely from the continent. " At the time of the Armada," says an English historian, " we saw England entering the race for the first time ; at Utrecht, England wins the ^^^'^^ • • • The positive gains of England were Acadie in No^a Scotia, and New- foundland surrendered by France, and the Assianto compact granted by Spain. In other words, the first step was taken towards the destruction of greater France by depriving her of one of her three settlements of Acadie, Canada and Louisiana, in North America. From that moment the rivalry in America is between France and England. . . . The decisive event of it is the Seven Years' War and the new position given to England by the treaty of Paris in 1^62. Here is the culminating point of English power in the eighteenth century ; nay relatively to other states, England has never since been so great." ' Cape Breton, from this time forward, commenced to be an influential factor in the aff"airs of New France. Before the close of the war and the cession of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland to England, the attention of the French government was directed to the importance of the geographical position of the island and to the expediency of making one of its harbours an enlrepdt for the trade between Canada, France and the West Indies. M. Eaudot, intendant of justice and police, and his son, who had charge of finance in Canada, recommended, in 1*708, that the island should be made available for commercial purposes, and very strongly pressed the necessity of fortifying one of its harbours, which " would afford a safe refuge for vessels chased by an enemy, driven in by storms or in want of provision?." Such a harbour would, in their opinion, " form a suitable rendez- vous for cruisers and privateers, while France might monopolize the codfishery on the coast of Acadie by means of a few small frigates, always ready to drive off foreign fisher- men."^ So far the island had been neglected, and Plaisance — the Placentia of the Portu- guese — was the headquarters of the French fisheries in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. At this time Newfoundland was inhabited by a considerable number of English traders and fisher- men, chiefly on the coast between Cape Eace and Cape Bonavista. Both the French and English had now a large fl.eet of vessels of considerable size engaged in these rich fisheries, the annual catch of the French alone being probably half a million quintals. When Newfoundland was given up to England in 1713, the French officials and inhabitants removed to Cape Breton, where English Harbour, from that time known as Louisbourg, was chosen as the capital. The island itself was named He Eoyale, St. Peter's became Port Toulouse, and the fine port of St. Anne became Port Dauphin, and seemed likely at one time to be chosen as the seat of government. The first governor of He Eoyale was M. de Costabelle,^ who had held a similar position at Plaisance, in Newfoundland. The ' Seeley, "Expansion of England," pp. 132, 133, 138. ^ For a very full abstract of this able memorandum of the Raudots, see Charlevoix, " Histoire G^n^rale de la Nouvelle France," iv. 129-142. ^ The following is a list of the French governors of lie Royale from 1713 to 1758 ; M. de Costabelle, 1712-1717 ; M. de St. Ovide, 1718-1735 ; M. de Brouillan, 1736-1738 ; M. de Forant, 1739-1740 ; M. Duquesnel, 1741-1744 ; Major Duchambon, 1745; [the English governors from 1745 to 1749 -/vere "Warren and Pepperrell (joint), Commodore Knowles and Colonel Hopson;] M. des Herbieres, 1749-1751 : M. leComte de Raymond, 1751-1754; M. d'Aillebout, 1754 ; M. de Drucour, 1754-1759. This list is made up from M. Marmette's summary of papers in the French archives relating to lie Eoyale. ("Canadian Archives," 1887.) M. de St. Ovide was also known a.? M. de St. Ovide de Brouillan, and it is a question whether the same person was not governor from 1736 to 1738, but I have not been able to clear up this doubt. 22 CAPE BEBTON AND ITS MEMOEIALS. island, in the course of years, received small accessions of population from Acadie, but, generally speaking, the inhabitants of that country showed little disposition to remove in any number to the island which France now began to value since she had lost so much by the triaty of Utrecht. It is interesting to note that in the negotiations that preceded this treaty England was desirous of holding Cape Breton in common with the French, ou condition that neither power should raise fortifications on the island. If this proposition had been agreed to, we might have had in these days some such complications as have arisen from the unfortunate clause in the treaty which gives the French certain fishing rights on a portion of the coast of Newfoundland, to the great irritation of the people of that island, who are now suffering from the consequences of the blunder on the part of Eng- lish statesmen, quite indifferent to colonial interests in those early times. The French government, however, not only succeeded in hampering the future development of Newfoundland, by obtaining this important advantage for their fishing interests, but they refused to agree to the proposition which was made by Saint John, afterwards Lord Bolingbroke, partly on the ground that as it was desirable " to establish a perfect good understanding " between France and G-reat Britain, " it was impossible to preserve it in the places possessed in common by the French and English nations ;" but the chief rea- son was no doubt the one also urged that it was prudence on the part of the French King " to reserve to himself the possession of the only isle which will hereafter open an entrance to the river St. Lawrence." In this way, by the foresight of the French, Cape Breton was spared the troubles that might have arisen had the English suggestion been hastily adopted, and the treaty of Utrecht finally provided that this island, " as also all others both in the mouth of the River St. Lawrence and in the gulf of the same name, shall hereafter belong of right to the king of France, who shall have liberty to fortify any place or places there." That we may understand the importance of Cape Breton in the contest between France and England for dominion in America it is necessary that we should survey the state of the colonies of the two nations on this continent. The English settlements extended from the Penobscot to the Spanish colony of Florida and were confined to a narrow range of country between the Atlantic and the Appalachian range of mountains. When G-eorge the First ascended the throne of England, soon after the signing of the treaty of Utrecht, the total population of these colonies had reached 3*75, "TSO white inhabi- tants, and 58,850 blacks ; in all, 434,600 souls, and was increasing with great rapidity. Their commercial activity and industrial enterprise had already created a total annual trade of imports and exports, probably to the value of twelve millions and a half of dollars.' The colonies of Massachusetts (which then included Maine), New Hampshire, Ehode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Virginia and the Carolinas (then comprising Greorgia) enjoyed representative institutions based on those of England, and local government in a very complete form. New England from its natural situation had, since its early settlement, watched with jealousy and dread the growth of the French settlements in Acadie and Canada, and when their villages were destroyed and their people massacred from time to time by the raids of Indians and French, they were nerved to make powerful efforts to seize Quebec and Port Eoyal. Phipps made an abortive attack on the ancient capital of Canada in 1690, and Admiral Sir » Hildreth, " Hist, of the U. S.," ii. 278, 329. Bancroft " Hist, of the U. S.," ii. 238. CAPE BRETON AND ITS MBMOEIALS. 23 Hovondeu "Walker never succeeded (I'm) in getting beyond the mouth of the St. Lawrence, but after a loss of eight transports and nearly nine hundred men decided to give up even the project of attacking the little French post of Plaisance and to return to England.' The whole expedition was destined to failure from the very start, as the chief command of the veteran regiments which had followed Marlborough to victory on the continent of Europe was actually entrusted to a notoriously incompetent brother of Mrs. Masham, who had supplanted the famous Duchess in Queen Anne's afi'ections. The Duke had refused to give him a colonelcy on the ground that he was a " good for nothing," ^ but court favour foisted him, at last, upon an expedition whose issue reflected disgrace on all concerned in it and sadly discouraged the English colonists who were looking forward anxiously to its success. Their hopes had already been considerably raised by the advantage previously gained by General Nicholson — an able man long connected with the government of the colonies — who succeeded in 1710 in taking possession of Port Royal.^ From that time Acadie ceased to be a French possession, and the people of New England felt that the first step had been taken towards ridding themselves of a dangerous neighbour in America. Half a century, however, would pass before all their hopes could be realized and England reign supreme in the valley of the St. Lawrence. ^ It appears that Sir Hoveuden was forced by public opinion in England to retreat to South Carolina and to write a book in his defence : — " When I perceived myself unworthy to serve niy,own nation any longer [see p. 21 of his Journal of the Expedition] I thought it more consistent with my principles, and indeed more honourable to retreat to the most distant part of the King's dominions, and pass the rest of my life in a private state of solitude and retirement." In concluding his apology or defence (see App. XV to this work) he consoles himself with this poetic outburst :— To conclude. " How thoughtless is the Man, and how unblest ! Who suffers Fortune to invade his Rest : Who vainly grieves at Injuries of Fate, Which eases none : But does more Ills create : Fondly pursuing Methods, for Eedress, Which ruffle, and destroy his inward Peace. Man is a world, and to himself can be. The Seat of Happiness, or of Misery : Whose reason, is the Monarch of his Mind, And uncontroul'd should rule and unconfin'd ; What boots it then, tho' fickle Chance deprives, Of outward Benefits, Chance only gives ? Tho' all the States on Earth should be at Tars Involv'd in foreign, or intestine Wars ; While his small Kingdom, undisturb'd shall be, From civil Discords, and rude Tumults free ; Fortune's Insults, he'll treat with just Disdain, And she'll attempt his settled Peace in vain. Let him secure a calm Repose within, He's safe : For Sorrows only then begin. When headstrong Passions dare rebellious prove. And reason from the Throne, by Force remove." 2 Bancroft, "History of the U. S.," ii. 200, 201 (N. Y., 1888, author's last ed.). ' The French Governor Subercase, who surrendered Port Royal to General Nicholson, had a commission from the French king as " Governor of Acadie, Cape Breton and the adjacent islands and countries." By his surrender then Cape Breton came also into the possession of England until 1713, when France awoke to its importance. Douglas, "Summary of the British Settlements," i. 345-346 ; Murdoch, " Hist, of Nova Scotia," i. 318. 24 CAPE BEETON AND ITS MEMOEIALS. Realizing, at last, the serious mistake they had made iu neglecting the defences of Acadie, the French government, after a few months of hesitation.— quite intelligible in view of the disasters of the great war — set to worii to adopt the wise advice of the Eaudots in I'TOS and to make Louisbourg a centre of trade on the Atlantic coast, and a bulwark of their dominion in Canada. Unlike the English colonists, the French on the St. Lawrence enjoyed no political liberties, but were governed by an aristocratic, illiberal system which crushed out every semblance of self-government and placed them entirely under the rule of the king and his officials in the province. Their only trade was iu furs, and the country gave no evidence of that commercial enterprise that distinguished the English colonies, where ship-building, the fisheries and tobacco cultivation were among the staple industries. In 1*714 there were only two towns of any importance in Canada, Quebec and Montreal, and their total population did not nearly equal that of Boston. The whole population of Canada did not exceed twenty-five thousand souls, or about one half that of Massachusetts, of which less than fi\^e thousand were capable of bearing arms. Although the commerce and population of Canada were insignificant in comparison with the English colonies, the French governors were ambitious to extend French dominion in America. Men like Joliet, Marquette and La Salle represented the spirit of enterprise which carried coureurs de bois, missionaries, traders and gentlemen-adventurers into the mysterious west which Frenchmen had discovered and explored forty years before G-over- nor Spottiswood and his gay following of Virginia gentlemen had crossed the Blue Ridge and saw the beauty of the Shenandoah Valley. The only practical result of that holiday trip of an English cavalier was the presentation of a pretty golden horseshoe to the gallant gentlemen who, in honour of the occasion, were named the "knights of the golden horseshoe" ; ^ but La Salle actually explored the country of the Illinois, descended the Mississippi and gaA^e to France the right to claim that great valley, which is now the home of many millions of people, inhabiting a rich country which seemed, at one time, destined to become a part of a mighty French empire in America. When the House of Hanover gave a king to England, there were already French posts and missions at important points on the great lakes and iu the northwest, discovered by the French explorers during the closing years of the seventeenth century: at Frontenac, on the head of the St. Lawrence River ; at Detroit, between Lakes Huron and Erie ; at Ste. Marie, between Lakes Huron and Superior ; at Mackinaw (Michillimacinac), between Lakes Huron and Michigan ; at Foit Miami, on the Si. Joseph at the foot of Lake Michigan ; at St. Louis, on the Illinois ; at Kaskakia, on the upper Mississippi ; at Mobile, on the Grulf of Mexico.^ These posts were the evidences of France's growing power in North America, the first steps towards the realization of that ambitious policy which, in the middle of the eighteenth century, laid claim to the Ohio Valley and attempted to confine the Eng- lish colonies between the sea and the Alleghanies. The fortifications of Louisbourg' were commenced in 1*720 and cost the French nation thirty millions of livres or about six million dollars, or taking into account the greater ' See Cooke's " Virginia," in tlie American Commonwealth Series (Boston, 1884) pp. 314, 315 ; Hins bale's " Old Northwest" (N.Y., 1891) i. 17, 18; the latter quotes Waddell's " Annals of Augusta Co.," pp. 6-9. ' For a brief sketch of the colonization of the Northwest, and the establishment of a chain of fortified posts between the lake country and the settlements on the St. Lawrence, see Hinsdale's " Old Northwest," i. 38-54. ' See large plan of the fortifications appended to this work. CAPE BBETON AND ITS MEMOEIALS. 25 value of money in those days over ten million dollars of our money, and even then they were never completed in accordance with the original design, on accouut of the enormous expense which far exceeded the original estimates, and of the reluctance of the French king to spend money in America when it was required to meet the lavish expenditure of mistresses and the cost of wars of ambition in Europe. The walls of the fortifications were chiefly built of a porphyritic trap —a prevailing rock in the vicinity. ' A considerable French Medal struck at foundation of fortifications of Louisbourg.^ portion of the finer materials used in the construction of the brick and stone masonry of the fortifications and buildings was actually brought from France, — as ballast probably in the fishing fleet from year to year — but it is also well known that a good deal of the timber and brick was purchased from traders of New England who had no objection to earn an honest penny, even among a people whom they at once despised and hated, and some of whom, in all probability, helped at a later time to demolish the very walls for which they had furnished materials.^ It is stated with such persistence by French officers, that we must believe that there is some truth in it, that the fortifications had been constructed carelessly and worthless sea sand used in mixing the mortar. It is quite probable that in Louisbourg, as in Canada, the officials in charge of the works cheated the government in every possible way in order to amass enough to get out of the country to which many of them had a strong aversion. ^ Dr, Gesner's "Industrial Resources of Nova Scotia," p. 308. "The quarry," he is writing of a visit to the ruins in 1849, " is seen about half a mile from the town. 'J he stones were employed in their rough state. With them I found a handsome cut rock, closely resembling the Portland stone of England. I have been informed that this rock was obtained by the French at Mira Eiver, but I have never seen any like it in America. Pieces of fine polished marble were also found among the ruins of the governor's dwelling." See App. XVI to this book for a reference to Dr. Gesner's work on Nova Scotia. 2 From the collection of Mr. McLachlan, Montreal. See App. XII to this work. — No. 1 in list. ' The New England merchants were always ready to take advantage of their position and make money out of England and France according to existing circumstances. Sir Hovendeu Walker, admiral of the fleet that met with disaster in 1711, while in the Gulf of St. Lawrence on the way to attack Quebec, (see supra sec. XI) tells us in his account of the ill-fated expedition, that while in Boston, for the purpose of obtaining supplies, Mr. Belcher, a rich and leadin" man of the province, refused to continue his contract to furnish provisions, because he could not get the exorbitant prices he asked. (See pp. 64, 65 of Journal.) Some of the captains of the ships expressed the opinion that " Belcher designed to buy up all the provisions to be had in the country to enhance the prices and so make the whole advantage to his own private interest." Mr. Peter Faneuil— a famous name in Boston still— was also remarkable for " the exorbitance of his prices." (See pp. 11,12 of Journal.) Puritan and Profit appear to have been often synonymous terms in the early history of New England. 4 26 CAPE BEETON AND ITS MBMOEIALS. The harbour of Louisbourg lies on the southeastern coast of Cape Breton and is a port very easily made by vessels coming from Europe. The cape from which the island takes its name, and which was always the landfall anxiously looked for by the. Breton, Basque and English mariners in the old times to which I have referred, lies only about two leagues in a northeasterly direction from the most easterly point of the harbour where a lighthouse has always stood since the days of French occupation. The harbour runs from southwest to northeast and has a length of about two miles and an average width of half a mile. It has a depth of from three to six fathoms of water, and affords safe anchorage at all seasons for a large fleet of vessels. It is rarely blocked by drift ice compared with other ports on that coast of Cape Breton and is open all winter, the little northeastern harbour being the only part frozen. It has a remarkably easy entrance from the sea of probably a third of mile in width between the rocky shore of Lighthouse Point and a chain of islets and rocks which form an impassable barrier to any approach from the ocean to the oblong neck of land on the southern shore of the port, where the fortified town of Louisbourg was built by the French. This point rises gradually from the harbour and forms a slight acclivity where the buildings stood, and then gently declines into the low ground, made up of swamp, rocky knolls and scrub, which lies between it and the great bay of G-abarus, which stretches to the southwest for a distance of from a mile and a sixth to four miles from the fortifications, "White Point being the nearest and Freshwater Cove the furthest in this direction. At the southwest extremity of the har- bour there was and is still a little barachois — a name generally given to a pond connected with the sea, — while the port narrows towards the northeast and forms an arm between the western shore and a rocky promontory, covered with scrubby spruce, averaging from a mile and a quarter to half a mile in width. This sheltered arm has been always the favourite anchorage of the fishing boats and schoonei-s from the earliest times. On the most prominent point of the promontory, at the entrance of the harbour, stands the light- house, from which a most magnificent view of the Atlantic can be had on a clear day. On the northeast side the French had a careening wharf where men-of-war could heave down and be repaired. On the opposite shore there were a large number of rude stages where the fishermen made their fish. The shore of the promontory is exceedingly rugged and precipitous in places, but between the lighthouse point and Cape Breton there are three picturesqtiely formed coves or small harbours, which have been always the resort of fishermen, and one of which is memorable as having been the scene of Lord Ochil- tree's abortive attempt to establish the first British colony on the island. The western side of the harbour has a very gradual ascent into the interior of the island, and was covered with a thick grove of small spruce, except where it had been cleared to make room for batteries and buildings and to prevent a cover for an attacking force too close to the town. The hilly country, which practically commands the town on this side of the port, stretches as far as Lake Catalogue, and beyond to the beautiful river and bay of Mira, a distance of about twelve miles. On this river, in the course of time, French people had comfortable farms and even gardens, and here and there the visitor can still see the narcissus growing among the ruins of their old homes and the stumps of old apple and plum trees which had been evidently planted by these early inhabitants of CAPE BRETON AND ITS MEMORIALS. 27 the island.' On the same river there was also a settlement of G-ermans, probably from Alsace-Lorraiue.- The fortifications enclosed an area of over one hundred acres, and had a circumference of about two and one-half miles. They were planned on the best system as laid down by Vauban and other great masters of engineering skill, and were intended to be, as indeed they were, despite their faulty construction, the most complete example of a strongly for- tified city in America. Writers have constantly referred to Louisbourg as " the American Dunkirk," and it is no exaggeration to say that its fortifications can be best compared to that powerful fortress which was for so many years a menace to England on the French coast. The strongest portion of the fortifications was necessarily constructed on the land side, stretching for two-thirds of a mile from the Dauphin or west gate at the northwest- erly angle of the walls or the southern shore of the harbour to within a short distance of the rocky shore at Black Point, and facing the country which stretches to Grabarus Bay, — necessarily the weak side since any attack by land must come from that direction. If we survey the general features of the fortifications, as set forth in the plans and descriptions which have come down to us, we find that the glacis was perfect on the southwest, or land front, as far as the shore extremity of the walls, and a ditch at least eighty feet in breadth extended throughout this distance. An escarpment rose above this ditch, but it was necessary to cross a bridge over a little stream before entering the west or Dauphin gate, which was protected by the Dauphin bastion and a circular battery mounting six- teen 24-pounders. Following the walls we come next to the King's bastion and citadel, which was protected by the glacis, a covered way, and a moat connected with the town by a drawbridge. The citadel was a long, oblong building of stDne, and contained apart- ments for the governor, a barracks and a chapel. In the bastion there were also an arsenal and a magazine, a place d'armes and a parade. Passing on for about five hundred feet, we come to the Queen's bastion, and midway between it and the Princess's bastion was the Queen's gate, which connected the town with the place d'armes at that point by a bridge over the ditch. The Princess's bastion formed the defence of the extreme south- western point of the wall, facing the rocky shore. From this point, for a distance of about two hundred yards, the defences consisted only of a rampart for small arms and a palisade, the rocky shore and shallow water being here well covered by the fire of the bastions. In ^ Jamea Gibson, who belonged to Brigadier-General Waldo's regiment in 1745, gives an account in his journal (see App. X to this work) of two fine farms on a neck of land in the west-northwest part of the island, about twenty-five miles from the Grand Battery. " First we came to a very handsome house, with two large barns, two large gardens and fine fields of corn. * * * The other was a fine stone edifice, six rooms on a floor and well fur- nished. There was a fine walk before it, and two barns contiguous to it, with fine gardens and fields of wheat. In one of these barns were fifteen loads of hay, and room sufficient for sixty horses and cattle." As Gibson speaks of a house " situated at the mouth of a large salmon fishery," Brown ("Hist, of C B.," p. 222n) is probably right in his conjecture that the farms were situated near the confluence of the Mira and Salmon rivers— a fertile and beautiful country. ' Writing to the French minister in 1753, M, Provost, the intendant, has the following remarks on the subject : " I had the honour of announcing the location of the German village on the border of the Grand Lake of Mira. It is there Count Raymond told me he wished to place it, but I have since then indirectly heard that the settlement had been changed to the grand Mira road, one league from the lake and at the foot of the Devil's Mountain. I hope I am wrong in this particular, but it is in the knowledge of everybody that the poorest land for the purpose has been chosen, and the grant of one arpent [nearly two English acres] as frontage to each lot is far too narrow." See •' Correspondance Generate, Archives Coloniales de la Marine " (Paris), vol. xxxiii, c. 11, fol. 100. S8 CAPE BEETON AHD ITS MEMOEIALS. the siege of 1'745, however, it was considered necessary to add a picquet line for addi- tional defence. The Maurepas and Brouillan bastions protected Rochefort Point, from which stretched to the southeast the rocks and island which guarded the harbour from the ocean. Beyond the Maurepas bastion there was a large pond, over which was built a long bridge of timber, communicating in a northwesterly line with the battery de la greve, which mounted ten guns and was the most important work on the harbour front of the town. The beach between the latter battery and the Dauphin bastion formed a little cove, which was protected by the cross-fire from those points, and over which stretched a boom in 1*7 45 to guard against fireships and to prevent the English from landing from boats on that side of the town. The wall around this cove was made of stone and earth, with a banquette and parapet for the use of musketeers. Here there were four gates communicating with the shore, chiefly for the purpose of bring- ing in supplies. Close by, within the walls, were the ordnance and general store- houses of the town. Accounts vary as to the number of cannon that were actually mounted within the circuit of the walls, but there were at the time of the first siege in 1745, embrasures for one hundred and forty-eight guns, and at the time of the second attack, thirteen years later, additional defences, including a battery of twenty-four guns, were erected at Rochefori Point. The town itself was well laid out in regular streets, six running east and west and seven north and south, crossing each other at right angles. A fine hospital and nunnery, built of stone, stood about the centre of the town. Connected with the hospital of St. Jean de Dieu was a small chapel. The residences of the people were generally small wooden structures on brick or stone foundations from six to seven and a half feet from the ground. "In some houses," says one writer who was in the town in 1'745, "the whole ground floor was of stone and the stories of wood."^ If we are to judge from a return of the buildings used by the military establishment in 1153,^ the accommodation for officials of the government and the officers and soldiers of the garrison was in many ways tinsatisfactory. The barracks and officers' quarters were too small and otherwise inadequate. In a place of the importance of Louisbourg, one would expect to find all the public buildings constructed of solid masonry, and every means taken to render them as safe as possible in times of war. The return in question shows, however, that the public buildings erected by the French themselves were for the most part of stone masonry, and that the wooden and other structures of a flimsy char- acter in the town had been hastily erected by the English while in possession of the place from 1745-49. In most cases these buildings were allowed to remain in use until 1758, when the guns of the besiegers made sad havoc in the wooden erection known as the English barracks. Shingles were largely used on the roofs of public as well as private buildings, and the dangers of the inhabitants in times of siege consequently increased to a criminal degree. As a matter of fact, Louisbourg appears to have been a town which, in its original design, was intended to be a place of impregnable strength, but which, through the parsimony of the French government, and the mismanagement and dishonesty of officials, had not realized the ideas of its founders in point of security. 1 " A Voyage to South America, etc.," by Don George Juan and Don Antonia de Ulloa, (see infra, sec. V, and App. X to this worli), the latter of whom describes Louisbourg in 1745. ^ See App. XVII to this worli for an official (French) enumeration of the officers' quarters, barracks, guar J- houses, powder magazines and other houses connected with the military establishment of Louisbourg in 1753. CAPE BEETON AND ITS MEMOEIALS. 29 The fortifications were indeed only completed a year or so before 1'745, and then, after it was given up by the English in 1748, it was in the possession of the French only ten years. Under the circumstances there must have been always a considerable uncer- tainty as to the future of the town, and the merchants who frequented it could hardly have gone to any heavy expenditure in a place of which they expected to make only a temporary home. During the years it was in the occupation of the French, there were probably, on the average, nearly two thousand people living in the town, but this number was increased in the time of war by the inhabitants of the surrounding countiy — G-ab- arus, Mira and Lorembec — who came there for protection. The garrison, in time of peace, reached one thousand men, and in addition to the force there was a detachment of troops stationed at the royal battery, one at the island battery, one at Port Toulouse and another at Port Dauphin. The island battery just mentioned consisted of thirty-two forty-two pounders, and protected the entrance of the harbour. The royal or great battery was situated on the western shore of the harbour, immediately facing the entrance, and was quite a formidable work, constructed with a moat and bastions on the land side, and mounting forty-four guns, twenty-eight of which were forty-two pounders. Both these works were intended to be important auxiliaries in the defence of the town, and had not the royal battery been suddenly deserted at the very commencement of the siege in 1745, the fortress would hardly have fallen so easily before the attack of Pepperrell and his men. III. GrOVEKNMENT AND StATE OF CaPE BkETON DXJKING THE FRENCH Ee(HME. The government of Cape Breton was modelled on that of Canada, to which it was subordinate, and consisted of a governor, generally a military man, a king's lieutenant, who was also commander of the forces, of a commissary, of an attorney-general, and of fojir or five councillors. These officials formed a governing body known as the superior council, which had also jurisdiction over the island of St. John, now Prince Edward Island. The governor was the president of the council, but, while he was nominally supreme in military affairs, he was controlled in financial matters by the commissary, who had also charge of the military chest and of all the military stores. This same officer had jurisdiction OA'er the administration of justice, in accordance with the ordinances of the king and the parliament of Paris. An inferior court known as the bailiwick tried civil suits and breaches of the peace, in accordance with the couiume de Paris, but the high court of justice in the colony was the council, to which appeals could be had in all cases, though their decisions might be reversed on reference to the supreme council in France. G-rants of land were made in accordance with the king's instructions by the governor and commissary. The members of the council, exclusive of the officials, were generally chosen from the leading persons of the colony. A court of admiralty, composed of a lieutenant, the attorney-general and a couple of minor officials, acted as a customs' establishment, where the merchants entered their goods and where any infractions of the port regula- tions could be punished by confiscation or fines. Justice, however, appears to have been loosely administered, since the officials were very inadequately paid and had no means of executing their decrees. One writer complains that " there was not even a common hang- man, nor a jail, nor even a tormentor to rack criminals or to inflict penal tortures." The w^riter in question, Thomas Pichon, who lived for some years in the town as secretary to 30 CAPE BRETON AND ITS MEMORIALS. Count Kaymond when governor of the island, does not express a favourable opinion of the mode in which the affairs of the colony generally were conducted ; but while he is obviously prejudiced in his comments, especially against the clergy and religious orders, one who remembers the peculation and jobbery prevalent for years in Canada during the closing years of the French regime may well believe that the officials at Louisbourg were equally corrupt, especially when we know that the commissary at Louisbourg for some time was Bigot, whose financial administration subsequently at Quebec nearly ruined the Canadian province at a time when it required all its resources to meet the great crisis in its history.' As was always the case in Canada, there was a constant conflict of authority between the governor and the commissary or acting intendant in Louisbourg, whose respec- tive powers appear to have been arranged for the special purpose of creating difficulties and making one a spy upon the other. The fact that the government of Cape Breton was subject to that of Canada did not help to maintain an orderly and peaceful state of things, since in case of dispute weeks and months generally elapsed before a decision on the point at issue could be obtained from the vacillating authorities at Quebec. Pichon gives us some examples of these divisions between the two chief officials. " Whatever the gover- nor proposed," he^ says in one place, " was sure to be contradicted by the commissary. The latter used to deny that the case was so urgent as to require his compliance ; neither would he, without an express order, deliver out the public money, which he has gener- ally in his custody. In the meantime the fortifications were neglected, and a dangerous enemy was ready and able to take advantage of our divisions ; so that before the quarrel between the two rivals in ambition, authority and interest could be decided, the proper precautions were likely to come too late." Though one could hardly blame the commissary for refusing to pay public money except on an express order from the nominal head of the government, it is certain that there was great looseness in the conduct of pub- lic afi'airs as well as a decided conflict of authority among those in office. Unhappily, too, for the colony, the officers of justice were often appointed without reference to their legal qualifications. When they were not military men, they were chosen from the inhabitants according to the caprice or favouritism of the governor and intendant, who had joint control over such appointments. At one time, for instance, the judge of the admiralty, who was also the judge of the inferior court of justice, had been a "journeyman wigmaker." It is quite easy to believe, then, that "this magistrate and the others of subordinate jurisdiction grew extremely rich, since they are interested in diffijrent branches of commerce, particularly the contraband." The religious wants of Louisbourg and of other parts of Cape Breton were under the ministration of a number of missionaries, some of whom laboured for years among the Micmacs, when there was probably not another white man on the island. In addition to the priests, there were at Louisbourg some members of a religious community in charge 1 " With the fall of Louisbourg, where he had acted as commissary, etc., coincides very closely the arrival in Canada of iDtendant Bigot, who, by his shameless robberies, prepared the way to the abyss of ruin into which New France was to be precipitated eleven years later. This degraded being would seem to have inoculated his subordinates with all his own vices as soon as he reached Canada ; for, previous to his coming, we find again and again in the letters of the governors and intendants reference to the probity and zeal of Varin, Morin, Martel and others, all of whom were afterwards the accomplices of the infaiiious intendant." See Marraette in "Canadian Archives," 1887, cxxxv. CAPE BEETON AND ITS MBMOEIALS. 31 of the hospital, as well as several nuns belonging to the Congregation de Notre-Dame,' which had been founded by the pious Sister Bourgeoys in the infancy of the Canadian colony, for the education of young girls'^ The hospital brothers also acted as physicians for the whole community in the absence of any regular doctors and druggists, apart from the surgeons of the troops. No mention is made by any writer of schools for the children, of whom there must have been a considerable number since there were, at least, between three and four thousand people in the island at one time and another from 1748 to 1758. In all probability, in Cape Breton as in Canada, education was exclusively in the hands of the priests and the religious orders. The codfishery was of course the staple industry of the people, and was carried on chiefly at Louisbourg and the adjacent bays. During the French occupation, New Eng- land fishermen were also largely engaged in the deep sea fisheries, and had for years a depot at Canseau, and many of them were in the habit of selling their cargoes to the French, although it was contrary to the French regulations. Nearly all the staple articles required for the use of the colony were brought from France. Before the place fell into the possession of England in 1758, the anticipations of the Eaudots were in course of realization, and Louisbourg was obtaining some importance as a port of call for the West Indian and Canadian fleets. In the autumn of 1744, the fleet that sailed from Louisbourg consisted of three men of war, six India ships, thirty-one other ships, nine brigantines, five "snows" ' and two schooners, mostly engaged in the "West Indian trade. A small trade also grew up between Louisbourg and the West Indies and the ports of Boston and New York, although both the English and French governments prohibited direct com- mercial relations between the island and their colonies, since it was the practice of those days to confine all commerce to the vessels of their own nations. The French authorities on the island, however, for their own reasons, wnnked at an illicit trade in fish and various articles of English and colonial production, and a good deal of smuggling was carried on for years at Louisbourg and other ports of Cape Breton. Sugar, coflee and tobacco from the French West Indies, and wines and brandy from France, found their way on board New England vessels in exchange for codfish, brick, boards, meal and various colonial commodities. As early as 1725 we find there were a number of New England vessels carrying on this trade regularly with Louisbourg. One of them, we read, took a whole cargo of claret and brandy for the use of the people of New York, who were, even in those days, as fond of good living as they are row.* The value of the fisheries aud commerce of Cape Breton necessarily varied from year to year on account of the constantly recurring wars between France and England, and the consequent derangement of trade in the French possessions in America. Elsewhere^ will be found some interesting details of fisheries and trade gathered from official sources of information in Paris. The French government took great pains to obtain regular ' This congregation, whose parent house is still in Montreal, has now 'Ranches at Sydney, Arichat and West Arichat or Acadiaville. (See infra, sec. X.) "" See Faillon, "Histoire de la Colonie Franfaise en Canada" (Montreal, 1865), ii. 284-286. ' A "snow" is described in the nautical dictionaries as "a vessel equipped with two masts resembling the main and foremasts of a ship and a third small mast just abaft the main mast, carrying a sail nearly similar to a ship's mizzen." But Preble (New Eng. Hist, and Gen. Reg., 1868, p. 396) says the largest two-masted vessels were sometimes called, "snows" or "galleys." « Murdoch, "Hist, of N. S.," i. 430. ^ See App. XVIII to this work. 32 CAPE BEBTON AKD ITS IIEMOEIALS. reports from its officers in America of everything touching the government, and the social, religious, and commercial condition of every one of its colonies, including Cape Breton. One estimate of the Cape Breton fisheries — a " supputation," as it is called in the French document — obviously from an English source, gives 560 as the total number of brigantiues, shallops, and other craft, and 3,400 as the total number of men employed in that branch of business in Cape Breton, previous to the taking of Louisbourg in 1*745. The total quantity of fish yearly made in the island is estimated at 186,000 quintals, valued at about i;93,000 sterling. The total value of the fisheries of the Grulf and Newfoundland, more or less dependent on the possession by France of the Island, and the maintenance of a strong fortress at one of its ports, is given at i;981, 692.10 sterling. At the time in question, it was estimated by the same authority that there were at least 414 vessels and 24,520 men engaged in the Gulf fisheries, and that the value of the annual catch was probably ill, 152,000 sterliug. This estimate is evidently calculated with a view to give the English government the most favourable view^ of the importance of Cape Breton, and to prevent them restoring it to the French.^ The official statements of the French, now accessible in the French archives, do not bear out the large estimate just mentioned. The official report of 1*753 ^ to the French government gives the following statistics of the value of the fisheries and trade of Cape Breton in that year : — THE FISHERIES. Vessels of all classes employed 300 -r, , , f 98,450 quintals P™