11 II .„«., ■ ... . .... m A's^ssmm^mi. ^^* sv sffis^sy^^^ss&s^^^ssss: CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 189I BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE rouge Cornell University Library ML 700.F48 1900 Pianoforte music % history with J*}! 3 1924 022 319 283 The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924022319283 PIANOFORTE MUSIC: ITS HISTORY, WITH BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES AND CRITICAL ESTIMATES OF ITS GREATEST MASTERS. JOHN COMFORT FILLMORE. PHILADELPHIA: THEODORE PRESSER, 1708 Chestnut Street. 1900. Copyright 18(3, TOWNSEND MAC COUH, Chicago. PREFACE. In entering a field hitherto unoccupied by any English- speaking writer, the author of this book has had in view the following objects: To discriminate clearly the natural epochs into which the history of pianoforte music divides; to give a lucid statement and exposition of the principles of composi- tion which have governed and determined the creative activity of those epochs; to trace the development of these principles as manifested in the phenomena of composition, and to point out the relation of the work of each epoch to what preceded and what followed it; to call attention to the great epoch-making composers whose work furnishes the chief examples of those char- acteristic principles ; to give a clear and discriminating account of their work, a trustworthy estimate of their relative rank and place in history, and to furnish bio- graphical sketches of them sufficiently full to give gen- eral readers a not inadequate notion of the men and their lives ; to notice the work and lives of minor com- posers and performers with as much fullness as the iv PREFACE. limits of the book would permit ; to trace the develop- ment of the technic of the pianoforte ; to give a suf- ficient account of the instruments which preceded the pianoforte, and of their relation to that instrument. How far he has succeeded in his aims he leaves to the judgment of his readers. But whatever shortcom- ings may be discovered in his work, the attempt is one which he believes requires no apology. The number of those who are strongly interested in the best piano- forte music is already large and is rapidly increasing. To all such, and especially to those who, like the author, are engaged in teaching the pianoforte, a connected account of the course of development of that music and of the composers who were instrumental in that development, can not fail to be welcome. Of the subjects here expounded, "The Content of Music" and "The Classic and Romantic" certainly deserve much more attention than they have hitherto received, and it is hoped that the present exposition will be found valuable. The biographical sketch of Chopin will be found more complete and accurate than any heretofore published in English, and the other biographies and critical estimates are at least fresh, and express the author's own judgments. The work has been a labor of love, and the author PREFACE. v can find no better wish for those who may do him the honor to be his readers, than that they may find the perusal of his work as interesting and profitable as the composition of it, and the necessary preparation for that composition, have been to himself. With this wish, and the sincere hope that his work may not only give useful information, but prove a helpful stimulus to the highest musical and intellectual life, he offers it to the public. J. C. F. Milwaukee, Wis., March 27 1883. Note. — The author takes this opportunity to acknowledge his obligations to numerous friends, and especially to Professors J. M. Geery, of Ripon College, W. S. B. Mathews, of Chicago, and Libra- rian Linderfelt, of the Milwaukee Public Library, for valuable suggestions, criticism and assistance. PREFACE TO FOURTH EDITION. The author has felt called upon to make a few additions to the list of minor composers and concert pianists (all Americans) of the present time. He has made a very few verbal changes in the book and has added questions at the end of the chapters, hoping thereby to increase its usefulness. Beyond these improvements he sees no way of bettering his work at present. He takes occasion once more to express his thanks to the musical public for its approval of his efforts. Milwaukee, October, 1888. CONSPECTUS. INTRODUCTION. THE PIANOFORTE AND ITS IMMEDIATE PRECURSORS, THE HARPSICHORD AND THE CLAVICHORD. PART I. THE FIRST CLASSICAL PERIOD. Chapter I. — polyphonic music. Chapter II. — the three greatest composers of polyphonic music SOR THE HARPSICHORD : J. S. BACH, G. F. HAENDEL, D. SCARLATTI. PART II. THE SECOND CLASSICAL PERIOD. A. The Epoch of the Development of the Sonata-Form. Chapter III. — monophonic music — form — the sonata-form. Chapter IV. — the three composers who developed the sonata- form TO ITS LOGICAL LIMITS : C P. E. BACH, JOSEPH HAYDN, W. A. MOZART. B. The Epoch of the Predominance of Content in the Sonata. Chapter V. — the content of music. Chapter VI. — l. van beethoven : the composer who embodied in THE SONATA THE NOBLEST POSSIBLE CONTENT AND RAISED IT TO THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE AS A WORK OF ART. vii CONSPECTUS. C. The Transition from the Classic to the Romantic Period. Chapter VII. — the classic and the romantic in music. Chapter VIII. — Beethoven's two greatest contemporaries in the DOMAIN OP PIANOFORTE MUSIC : C. M. VON WEBER AND FRANZ SCHUBERT. PART III. THE ROMANTIC PERIOD. Chapter IX. — mendelssohn, chopin and Schumann. PART IV THE DEVELOPMENT OF PIANOFORTE TECHNIC. Chapter X. — the technic of the first classical period. Chapter XI. — the technic of the second classical period. Chapter XII. — the technic of the transition period. Chapter XIII. — the technic of the romantic period. PART V. Minor Composers and Virtuosi of the Different Epochs, Chapter XIV. — A. the epoch of polyphonic music. B. the epoch of the sonata. C. the contemporaries of the romanticists and their suc- cessors, TO THE PRESENT. HlSTOET OF PlANOFOETE MlJSIO, INTRODUCTION. THE PIANOFORTE AND ITS PRECURSORS, THE CLAVI- CHORD AND THE HARPSICHORD. The pianoforte* is an instrument too well known to require description here. Its characteristic pecu- liarity, as distinguished from the instruments from which it was derived, the harpsichord and the clavi- chord, is that the tone produced from its strings can be made soft or loud at the pleasure of the per- former. The means by which these effects are pro- duced consist in hammers connected with the keys, and so arranged that the performer can, by graduating his touch, make them strike the strings with varying degrees of force, with the effect of eliciting every degree of sonority of which the strings are capable. The pianoforte was invented in Italy, at the be- ginning of the eighteenth century. The first piano- fortes of which we have any authentic information were made in Florence, by Bartholomew Cristofori, *The name " pianoforte " is a compound of two Italian words. piano^ soft, aa&foriei loud. It means, therefore, etymologically, a " soft-loud." Introduc- tion. The Piana. forte. Invented in Italy about 1700. HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Introduc- tion. The Harp- sichord and Clavichord. Their tones weak. in 1709. These instruments were the result of efforts to improve the harpsichord, so as to make it capable of producing tones of various degrees of power. This need was everywhere felt, and other makers of harpsichords, in other countries, were also engaged in attempting to solve this problem. The harpsichord and clavichord had this in common with the pianoforte; they had metallic strings, stretched horizontally in a frame over a sounding board, and were played by means of keys. But the strings of the harpsichord were snapped, by means of crow's quills, and those of the clavichord were set in vi- bration by means of a. push from a small brass wedge or "tangent," set in the end of the keys. This lat- ter instrument already had some capability of gra- dations of power, and for this reason it was a favor- ite with the best musicians. It required great deli- cacy of touch, and in the hands of a master was,, within certain limits, a very expressive instrument. But strings vibrated in this manner were necessarily thin and light, and produced only soft and delicate tones. T he ha rp sichord also had light strings, and its tones_jwere_weakj It was not only impossible to produce much variation in the power of the tone, but no powerful tone could be obtained from any string, whether light or heavy, by any such methods of producing vibration. Heavy strings, especially, must be struck, not snapped nor pushed, in order to produce their maximum of tone; and it was in the direction of heavy strings and a larger sounding IN TROD UCTION. board that progress was to be made toward an in- crease of sonority, after the means had been found of producing the greatest amount of tone of which the lighter strings were capable, as well as of vary- ing their power. In the early part of the last century, then, the clavichord and harpsichord had reached the limit of their development, and musicians and instrument makers were anxiously striving to secure results of which these instruments were intrinsically incapable. But, though Cristofori, and others of his contempor- aries and immediate succcessors, hit on the right principle, the first crude applications of it were not immediately successful. The new instruments did not find favor with players for a long time. This w as partly because of the still rem aining defects_of t heir constru ction, for much_time was required, to perfect the comrjlicated_actjon of the pianoforlcso as_to_secure_ promptness, _delicacy and. .-B&wer__gf tS.u£h Jt Jo_d^rmo_ths_strings _ prope^ t t^remoye_the harrmierJlQrn Jthe__string _ as soon . as Jt_had struck, and have it. in . readiness fOTjmJnsjan^ repetkion of the_strgkej It was also partly due, perhaps, to the fact that players accustomed to the older instru- ments could not readily find themselves at home with the new mechanism, and preferred that with which they were familiar. At any rate, so great a musi- cian and player as LS^ jSach. condemned the S il- bermann pianofortes shown him in 1726, a s being heavy in touch, and" weakTn the treble; his son, C. PTJi. Bach, is said always to have preferred the Introduc- tion. New results sought. Mechanical results to be attained. HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Introduc- tion. The Sfinet and Virgi- nals. clavichord, and even Mozart, to the end of his life, was a harpsichord player, rather than a pianist. But toward the end of the century, great improve- ment were madejin the construction of the piano- forte^ the number^ of _comrjosjtions specially calcu- l ated for the capabilities of the instrument had^ greatly increased; the younger musicians had be- came familiar with its manipulation; and by the be- ginning of the present century, the clavichord and harpsichord were driven forever out of use. In closing this brief sketch, it remains to give a passing glance at two other instruments, the spinet and virginals. Concerning these it is only necess- ary to say that they were merely varieties of the harpsichord, differing from it only in shape and size, but not in principle, much as square and upright pianofortes differ from a concert grand, which is shaped like the old harpsichords. A full account of all these instruments is to be found in Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musi- cians. paet fikst. The Fikst Classical Peeiod. i 700-1 750. CHAPTER I. POLYPHONIC MUSIC. Melody is a series or succession of tones rhythmi- cally ordered. Harmony is a combination of tones heard simul- taneously. Counterpoint is the art of writing two or more melodies to proceed simultaneously. Music thus written is called "contrapuntal" or "polyphonic." The latter term means " many- voiced." In poly- phonic music, harmony is an incidental result of the simultaneous progression of the voices. "Monophonic " or "homophonic "* music has only one principal melody. This is usually accompanied by chords, more or less full, either in their simple form, or broken up into arpeggios. Sometimes, however, other subordinate melodies form the ac- companiment, to a greater or less extent. This is especially true of the bass, which often is a well- defined melody, but is never, in this style of music, quite equal in importance and interest to the princi- pal melody. Sometimes, indeed, the principal mel- ody is given to the bass, the harmonic accompani- ment being above it. ♦The present writer has chosen the terra "monophonic" ("one-voiced"), as representing more accurately the fact that music in this style, has only one prominent melody at any given point. Many German writers prefer the term "homophonic." 7 Chap. I. Definition of Terms, HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. I. Beginnings of Modern Music, Early' Counter- joint. In the monophonic style of composition, harmony- is no longer an accident, so to speak, but the chords, in their successions and relations, exist independent of any interweaving of separate melodic parts. The beginnings of our modern music, in the early Christian church, were monophonic in the strictest sense. The congregations sang their hymns in uni- son, without any accompaniment. Afterwards, singers and composers began to accompany this melody with one or more independent melodies, in tones of the same length as those of the original melody, or cantus firmus, as it was called. This was the beginning of counterpoint, "punctum contra punctum," point against point. At that time there were no notes; points weie used instead. We should say note against note. Certain monks of the middle ages cultivated this science; sought to determine what intervals might be admissible; and gradually developed their art to a high pitch of per- fection. The separate melodies gradually became more and more florid, the number of them was in- creased, until, at last, compositions were written in as many as thirty-six real parts. Of course, these extremely complicated webs of tone were nearly or quite unintelligible to most musicians, and wholly so to amateurs. But they were masterpieces of in- genuity, and the interest in counterpoint which pro- duced them, had developed consummate skill in the management of simultaneously progressing voice- parts. The technic of composition in this first great POLy PHONIC MUSIC. style (the polyphonic) was developed through the enthusiastic labors of composers, monks, theorists and pedants, among whom there appeared, now and then, a man of genuine creative genius. Among these ought especially to be mentioned Orlandus Lassus, (1530 (?)-i594) a Netherlander, whose most important work was done in Munich, and Giovanni Pierliugi di Palestrina (1524-1594), a Roman church composer, in whom the contrapuntal art pre- vious to Sebastian Bach found its culmination. At first, the efforts of contrapuntists were directed solely toward the discovery of intervals pleasing to the ear, and combining melodies so as to produce agreeable effects at every point. Then came the effort to enhance the effect of consonances by the judicious use of dissonances. This resulted in mak- ing the parts more smooth and flowing in their movement. But, as the separate melodies began to be more and more florid, the need of some means of securing unity was felt. A complicated web of interwoven melodies, having no elements in com- mon, and no bond of union except consonance in their intervals would be nearly or quite unintelligi- ble. The means by which unity was secured was Imitation. Of Imitation there are two principal kinds, the Strict and the Free. The simplest form of Strict Imitation is the Canon. In this form of composition, after one melody has proceeded alone for one or more measures, another part (or "voice") begins the same melody, and con- Chap. I. The technic 0/ Compost' Hon devel- oped. The pleas- ing in sen- sation sought first. Strict Imi- tation IO HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. I. The Fugue. The Fugue in two-voice parts. tinues it, in strict imitation, at the interval of an oc- tave (or perhaps some Other interval), until the final cadence of the first melody is reached, when the second melody is modified to suit the requirements of the close, and both come to an end together. Of course, in the invention of the first melody regard must be had to the imitation which is to progress with it. This requires much ingenuity and skill. There are also canons in three, four, or more parts; and many curious and ingenious kinds of canons, which can not here be described. The most elaborate of the forms of Strict Imita- tion is the Fugue. This is the culmination of the strict polyphonic style, both in respect of technical requirements, of beauty, and expressive power. A fugue may be written in two, three, four, five or more parts. Some one of the parts starts with a short, well-defined melody, which' is the "subject" of the fugue. Then another voice replies with an imitation of this subject, in the key of the dominant. This imitation is called the "answer." The first part accompanies the answer by a new melodic phrase, so contrived as to contrast with the original phrase and serve as a foil to it. This is called the "counter subject." If the fugue is in two parts only, when the answer is completed by the second part, the "exposi- tion" of the fugue is said to be complete. Then fol- lows an interlude or episode, in which fragments of the subject and counter subject are used as imita- tions. This episode leads to the second entry of the subject, which commonly takes place in reverse POLYPHONIC MUSIC. order to the exposition; i. e., if the exposition began with the soprano and the bass answered it, the bass now leads with the subject and the soprano follows with the answer. After this comes another episode, and then a " stretto," where the answer enters before the subject has finished. The whole is closed with a " coda," more or less elaborate. This is the simplest outline of the fugue form. When the fugue is written for three, four or more voices, there are often more than three entries of the subject and answer in all the parts. After the exposition, or first complete entry of all the voices, the order of entrance and the modulations into dif- ferent keys are left to the imagination and skill of the composer. So are the length and richness of the interludes, and the greater or less elaboration of the coda. The stretto is sometimes a strict canon. The counter subject is often so constructed as to go in double counterpoint with the subject; that is, is so contrived that the lower of them may be transposed an octave higher, or the higher an octave lower, and the relations of the two still be correct and satisfac- tory. There are fugues with two, three, four and more subjects. Free Imitation occurs when the imitations of a given subject or " motive " take place without any exact following of the original order of intervals, and not in accordance with any fixed rule as to their number, or the order of their entrance. The old compositions in this style were Preludes, Inventions, Fantasias, Toccatas, Sonatas, and various forms of Chap. I. More elaborate Fugues. Double Counter- point. Free Imitw tion. HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. I. The Suite. Examples of poly- phonic music. How in- strumental polyphony was devel- oped dance music. Most of the compositions passing un- der these names were polyphonic. The sonata form will be considered further on. The Suite was a series of dance tunes, often intro- duced by a prelude. They were invariably all in the same key, and were so arranged as to contrast with one another in tempo. The first dance was commonly moderately fast; the second very rapid, the third slow and stately, the fourth and perhaps the fifth less slow, but still majestic and dignified, and the last a lively, rollicking jig. The following examples are recommended to students. J. S. Bach, "Two-part and Three-part Inventions, "Das Wohltemperirte Clavier" (The Well-Tempered Clavichord), a collection of forty- eight preludes and fugues in all the keys; English and French Suites and Partitas. Haendel,* six- teen Suites, Lecons, Pieces, Fugues, Fuguettes. D. Scarlatti, eighteen pieces (Buelow). All these can be obtained in the cheap but excellent edi- tion of C. F. Peters in Leipzig. There is also a set of pieces by Scarlatti, edited by Louis Koehler, and published by Julius Schuberth & Co., Leipzig. The polyphonic music was first written for voices, and for the service of the church. Afterwards secu- lar music, (madrigals, etc.) came into vogue. When the organ and other keyed instruments had been invented, they were at first used for accompani- *For typographical reasons the e is used in this and all other cases in- stead of the umlaut. POL YPHONIC MUSIC. 13 ments to vocal music. From this it was an easy step to transfer the vocal forms to separate instru- mental performances, and this naturally led to inde- pendent composition for these instruments. The most elaborate and masterly fugues are those of J. S. Bach, for the organ and clavichord. For these instruments the polyphonic music was written, and with the year of Bach's death, 1750, this first classi- cal period may be said to have closed. Its signifi- cance to us lies in the fact that all its treasures are still available for the pianoforte, which has sup- planted the harpsichord and clavichord, and that a knowledge of it is indispensable to every pianist. Chap. 1. CHAPTER II. Chap. II. /. 5. Bach. Life and education at his brother's. the three greatest composers of polyphonic music for the harpsichord: Johann Sebastian Bach, 1685-1750. George Frederick Haendel, 1685-1759. Domenico Scarlatti, 1683-1757. By far the most important of all composers for the harpsichord was John Sebastian Bach. He was the most distinguished representative of a numerous family of musicians, who lived in Eisenach and its neighboring towns for some two centuries. They were a simple, honest, straightforward, high-minded race; they lived quiet domestic lives, and devoted them- selves to their art, with a simplicity of character, and an elevation of purpose, which always secured them the respect and love of their fellow-townsmen. The subject of this sketch was born in Eisenach, March 21, 1685. He received his first lessons from his father, beginning with the violin. But losing both his parents before he was ten years old, he went to live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, organ- ist at Ohrdruff. With him he began lessons on the clavichord. He made remarkable progress, and speedily gave evidence of the gifts which were by and by to raise him to the highest pinnacle of fame. His brother seems to have repressed rather than encouraged the impulses of the child's genius He /. S. BACH. *5 not only refused him the use of his own collection of music, by the best masters of the time, but after the boy had surreptitiously obtained the book, and la- boriously copied the whole, by moonlight, this hard- hearted and unappreciative teacher took the well- earned and dearly-prized copy away from him. At the age of fifteen, he was sent away to Lueneburg to school, and entered the choir, in which his services paid for his school tuition, including vocal and instru- mental music. He made rapid progress in playing the organ and harpsichord, and improved every op- portunity to hear the best performers of Lueneburg and the neighboring town of Hamburg. He was also greatly influenced and inspired by the per- formances of the duke's orchestra at Celle, a band at that time made up largely of Frenchmen, and playing mostly French music. He remained at Lueneburg three years. At the end of that time he entered an orchestra at Weimar, and soon after became organist at Arnstadt. Here he studied and practiced with the utmost diligence and zeal, striving to perfect himself, both in playing, and in theory and composition. In 1705 he spent three months at Luebeck, for the purpose of hearing the celebrated organist, Buxtehude, and of becom- ing acquainted with him. Bach's reputation as an organist was now begin- ning to spread. He received several offers of situa- tions, and in 1707 he accepted an organist's post at Muehlhausen in Thueringen, but left it in 1708, when he was twenty-three years old, to become court or- Chap. 11. School life at Luene- burg. Goes to Weimar. i6 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. II. Becomes Court or- ganist. Removes to Leipzig. Visits Frederick the Great. ganist in Weimar. Here he remained nine years, during which time he won acknowledged rank as first of organists and organ composers. He wrote here most of his greatest works for the organ. He made annual concert-tours, playing both the organ and clavichord, and won an extended reputation as a master of the highest rank. In 17 17, he accepted the appointment of con- ductor at Coethen, and now for five years devoted himself mainly to composing, and directing public performances of chamber music. But in 1723, he was appointed cantor at the St. Thomas school at Leipzig, and also organist and director of music in the two principal churches. Here he remained until his death, July 28, 1750, writing music for his choir for almost every service; chorals, motets, cantatas, and great works for the festivals of the church, among them one High Mass, and his immortal Pas- sion Music. For the rest, he lived a quiet, retired life, devot- ing himself, not only to his musical labors, but to the education of his numerous children, of whom he had twenty, by two marriages. The most notable incident which broke the monotony of his daily rou- tine, was a visit to Frederick the Great, in 1747. Bach's son Emanuel was Frederick's principal court- musician. The king, who was a lover of music, in- vited the father to visit him, and treated him with greatest respect and consideration. As usual, Bach's playing and his wonderful skill in improvising on given themes, excited the strongest admiration. /. 5. BACH. 17 Soon after this he became blind, and continued so for the short remainder of his life. His death occurred from a fit of apoplexy, July 28, 1750. Bach was one of the world's great creative minds; an original genius of the highest order; a most con- summate master of the art of musical composition as understood in his day, and he had no superior in playing the harpsichord and clavichord. All the re- sources and capabilities of these instruments he thoroughly understood. He was, it is true, very much more than a master of the harpsichord; he was the greatest organist of his time, and his organ compositions are the noblest and most significant the world has yet known. He was a teacher and choir-leader, and a very large part of his mental ac- tivity was spent in the production of church music, of which he has left behind an immense amount, — hundreds of cantatas, motets, chorals, a great Mass in B minor, five separate settings of the Passion of our Lord as given in the gospels, of which that stu- pendous work, the Passion Music according to St. Matthew, will forever remain one of the great monu- ments of Protestant religious art. But though he composed so much for chorus, organ and orchestra, besides chamber music, he nevertheless wrote a very large number of compositions for the harpsichord. Many of these works are of permanent value from their nobility and beauty of style and their intrinsic emotional significance, and all are characterized by high intellectual qualities, and consummate musi- cianship. Moreover, although the instruments for Chap II. Death. Bach'i rank. His works /or the Harpsi- chord. HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. II. His influ- ence on the Romanti- cists. His stimu- lating Quality which they were written have become totally obso- lete, the style, and even the technic of these compo- sitions is such, that whoever wishes to take a high rank as a pianist, must devote to them the most earnest and diligent study. This is doubly true if the pianist aims beyond mere technic, at high ar- tistic qualities and musicianship. Said Robert Schu- mann, "Make the 'Well Tempered Clavichord' your daily bread; then you will surely become a thorough musician." This advice, coming from a writer ap- parently as far removed as possible from the man- ner and style of Bach, is highly significant Chopin and Mendelssohn, who, with Schumann, made the Modern Romantic School of pianoforte writing, were diligent students of Bach, and drew a large part of their inspiration from him. These facts may help to show us how immensely important Bach's influence has been, and still is. The secret of this influence lies partly in the profound originality, and the inspired quality of Bach's genius, and partly in the unsurpassed intellectual grasp and power by which his works are everywhere characterized. The study of a Bach fugue is an intellectual exercise of the most salutary kind; an exercise, the severity of whose de- mands on mental concentration and on the power of sustained thinking, constitutes a most valuable means of intellectual discipline. There is no keener intellectual pleasure than these works afford, to him who has mastered them. Bach's instrumental works are the culmination of the polyphonic or contrapuntal style. Up to his G. F. HAENDEL. 19 time this was the prevalent manner of writing, and almost the only one cultivated by musicians. The monophonic style, indeed, had already a beginning. Opera airs and folk songs had been transferred to the keyed instruments; some dance music also had come to be written in this style. But the aim of all composers was to write good counterpoint, and that in the strict style, canons and fugues. Freer forms were also used, as described in the preceding chap- ter, which gave more scope to the fancy of the com- poser. Though founded on the fugal style, they often showed a reaching out after a freer, more elastic and flexible means of emotional expression than was to be found in the comparatively stiff formality of the strict mode of writing. One, es- pecially, of these works, the Chromatic Fantasia of Bach, is a distinct prophecy of the Romantic School, which was to appear a hundred years later. George Frederick Haendel (commonly called in England Handel), was born in Halle, Feb. 23, 1685. His family was not musical, and whence he obtained his musical gifts it is not easy to determine. But gifts he had, which were not to be repressed. His father was a physician, who despised all art and artists, and even went to the extreme of keeping his son from school, lest he should there learn some- thing of music. But the boy learned somehow, in spite of his father. He used to practice on an old spinet, with muffled strings, which, with somebody's connivance, he had hidden in the garret, and by the time he was seven years old, had become no mean Chap. II. Haendel, The boy learns to play. HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. II. Lessons •with Zachau. Enters the Hamburg oJ>era or- chestra. performer. At this time his whole future career was decided by the interference of the Duke of Saxe-Weissenfels. The child had accompanied his father on a visit to Weissenfels, had managed to ob- tain access to the organ in the duke's chapel, and had given such surprising proofs of genius that the duke strongly urged upon doctor Haendel the wis- dom of humoring his son's bent. He was now placed under the tuition of Zachau, organist of the cathedral at Halle, and took lessons on the organ, harpsichord, violin and oboe, and in counterpoint, canon, fugue, and all the forms of composition then practiced. He wrote a motet every week during the three years he remained with Zachau. His master then confessed that he could teach him nothing more. The ten-year old boy was sent to Berlin, where he made some valuable musi- cal acquaintances, and astonished every one by his surprising improvisations on the organ and harpsi- chord. He soon returned to Halle, and spent some years in study and composition, copying large quan- tities of the best music then known. His father died, and left George and his mother poor. So the boy set to work to support them both. In 1703, he went to Hamburg and entered the orchestra of the German opera-house, as a violin player. He amused himself a short time by pretending to be very ignor- ant, but happening to take the leader's place at the harpsichord one day, in the absence of the regular conductor, he displayed such ability as at once G. F. HAENDEL. 21 placed him permanently in that position. He re- mained here three years, and composed his first three operas, besides other compositions. The suc- cess of these, his pay at the theater, and what he had earned by giving lessons, had enabled him to lay up a considerable sum, beyond what was re- quired to support himself and his mother. So he de- termined to make a musical pilgrimage to Italy, the country which had been the field of labor of some of the greatest of the Netherland contrapuntists, where the ancient contrapuntal style of Catholic church music had culminated in Palestrina, where the opera had first been called into existence, — the country whose leadership in music was still unquestioned. He spent three years in the great musical centers of Italy, Rome, Venice, Naples and Florence. He composed successful operas, church music and a serenata, and made the acquaintance of the most distinguished Italian musicians, among them, Do- menico Scarlatti. These men received him with the greatest cordiality, and expressed the highest ad- miration both of his compositions, and of his skill as an organist and harpsichordist. In 1709 he re- turned to Germany, and accepted a conductor's post from the Elector of Hanover, on condition of being allowed to visit England. He accordingly went to London in 17 10, and at once composed the opera "Rinaldo," to an Italian libretto, for the Hay- market Theater. The work, though written in only fourteen days, was received with the greatest en- thusiasm, and Haendel immediately found himself Chap. II. Visitsltalj. Conductor at Hanaver. HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. II. Goes to London. famous. He stayed in London only six months, as his leave of absence had expired, but after his Lon- don triumph, his life and work in Hanover no longer contented him. Early in 17 12, he again obtained leave of absence, and coming to London, he lingered far beyond the time allowed him. This naturally offended his mas- ter, the elector, and when that prince came to En- gland as George I, Haendel thought it best to avoid showing himself to the new monarch. However, it was soon made up between them. The king ar- ranged some festivity on the Thames, and one of his suite advised Haendel to compose some music for the occasion. This he did, and following the king's barge, in a boat, with his band, he played it, greatly to his majesty's satisfaction. George I was too good a judge of music to deprive himself longer of the services of such a musician, so he not only received him into favor, but granted him an an- nuity of two hundred pounds. The two years from 1716 to 1718 Haendel spent with the king in Hanover. Then returning to England, he became chapel-master to the Duke of Chandos, a wealthy nobleman, who lived in a style of great splendor. He remained in this post three years, writing music for the English church service, and harpsichord music for the daughters of the Prince of Wales, who were his pupils. He also wrote here his so-called " Serenata," "Acis and Galatea,'' and "Esther," his first English oratorio. He had written G. F. HAENDEL. 2 3 a German oratorio, the "Passion," during his last stay in Hanover. In 1720 he became director of Italian Opera for the Academy of "Music, and from this time, for seventeen years, he was constantly engaged in com- posing operas, and managing operatic enterprises, with varying success. At last, in 1737, he became bankrupt. He made a few ineffectual efforts to re- cover himself, during the next two years, and then turned his attention almost exclusively to the com- position of English oratorios. Here he found his real field. He had had more than forty years of ex- perience as a composer, and all the resources of musical expression then known were perfectly at his command. His imagination was vivid and power- ful and dealt most vigorously with the sublimest re- ligious conceptions. So that in "The Messiah," " Samson," " Saul," "Judas Maccabaeus," and " Is- rael in Egypt," he. created imperishable works, of the loftiest character. Haendel was a large, vigorous man, open-hearted and generous, passionate and hot-tempered, but very placable, of unconquerable will, energetic, industri- ous, and withal full of genuine religious feeling. The themes he loved to treat were such as called forth joyful adoration and worship. The two great climaxes in " The Messiah," the "Hallelujah" chorus and " Worthy is The Lamb," are unsurpassed and unsurpassable as expressions of this phase of re- ligious emotion. He could treat the tender and pa- Chap. 11. Becomes director 0/ Italian opera. His personal character. The Messiah. 2 4 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. II. Contrasted with Back's Passion Music. Dontenico Scarlatti. thetic aspects of the Messiah's life and work with no less depth and nobility of feeling. Witness his " Be- hold the Lamb of God," and "He was Despised." A comparison of these with parallel passages in Bach's " Passion Music " will reveal the character- istic differences in the emotional natures of the two men. Bach naturally dwells on the scenes of the Passion and Crucifixion; he dissolves in tears and grief, he melts in contrition, in penitence, in loving, grateful, humble worship. Haendel, too, feels all this, but in a different way, and he does not linger on it; he hastens on to exult in the glorious triumph of the risen Redeemer, to shout forth Hallelujahs in some of the sublimest strains ever uttered by man. In these oratorios Haendel left his noblest legacy to the world. His organ and harpsichord music, on account of which latter he is necessarily mentioned in this history, was much less significant. Never- theless, some of it is of permanent value, as, for in- stance, his " Fire " fugue, and his so-called " Har- monious Blacksmith," and he can not be passed over without honorable mention, since he was, next to Bach, the greatest German organist and harpsi- chordist of his time, as well as one of the greatest composers of all time. He lived unmarried, died in London April 14, 1759, and was buried in West- minster Abbey. Domenico Scarlatti, born in Naples in 1683, was the son of Alessandro Scarlatti, a composer of church music of no small importance in musical DOMENICO SCARLATTI. 25 history. Domenico's significance lies chiefly in the fact that he was a most brilliant virtuoso upon the harpsichord, and a composer of pieces which not only surprise even the advanced pianists of the present day by their brilliancy and difficulty (they are, in fact, more difficult to play on a modern concert pianoforte than on a harpsichord of Scar- latti's time), but which are of no small musical sig- nificance and value. He traveled much, met Haen- del in Venice, was some years chapel master at the Vatican, in Rome, played in London, in Lisbon, in Italy again, and finally settled in Madrid, in 1739. Here he remained, admired and respected, as com- poser and virtuoso, until his death, in 1757. Scarlatti was not, like Bach and Haendel, a great creative genius of the first rank, but his harpsichord compositions, although greatly inferior in intrinsic significance and permanent influence and value to those of Bach, are probably nearly equal to most of Haendel's, and are even more difficult of execution than any of his, so that in any history of pianoforte music, he must occupy a prominent and an honorable place. J Chap. II. His music compared •with Bach and *faendei. PAET SECOND. The Second Classical Peeiod. A. The Epoch of the Development of the Sonata-Form. 1 750-1 800. CHAPTER III. MONOPHONIC MUSIC — ITS FORMAL CONSTRUCTION — THE SONATA-FORM. Monophonic as distinguished from polyphonic music has already been denned. (See Chap. I.) It was originally vocal. The monophonic composi- tions for the harpsichord grew out of the use of this instrument as an accompaniment to the recitatives and airs of the opera, a form of composition which came into existence in Italy in the latter part of the 1 6th century. These airs and their accompaniments were soon played on the keyed instruments in use, and gradually separate instrumental compositions in the same style came into vogue. These existed side by side with compositions of the prevalent poly- phonic style, and gradually became popular. In- deed, the tendency toward the monophonic style showed itself even in many polyphonic composi- tions for the harpsichord, by such masters as Sebas- tian Bach and Haendel. In many of thei r suites, we fi nd, in dances which are essentially polyphonic, numerous i nstances of sudden cho rds, filled up to dou ble the number_QX_YQ_ice p arts properly belong- ing to the p lan Xhes£_are_hints of the employment of chords in masses, to produce climaxes, or to re inforce loud^r^s&ag^j^ludiis^or^of t^imp_orUnt Chap. Ill* Mono- phonic music at first vocal. Mono- phonic ten\ denotes in polyphonic music. 3° HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. III. Scarlatti's Sonatas mono- phonic. TheSonata. characteristics of monophonic music. Many of these dances were also monophonic, in the sense that they had one predominant lyric melody, to which the remaining contrapuntal voices were subor- dinate. Domenico Scarlatti went farther, and composed sonatas, monophonic in almost the same sense in which the sonatas of Haydn and Mozart are mono- phonic. In these, as a rule, only one melody is heard at a time. The accompaniment is made up of chords, more or less full, or of arpeggios. The melody is taken up, now by one voice and now by another, the accompaniment being also transposed. These sonatas of Scarlatti's are the most eminent examples, known to the present writer, of mono- phonic music before the death of Sebastian Bach. They are compositions in one movement only. The only compositions for the harpsichord in more than one movement, at that time, were the suites, previ- ously referred to, partitas and concertos. Sebastian Bach wrote organ sonatas in three movements, and his son Carl Philip Emanuel wrote similar ones for the harpsichord, of which two movements were com- monly in the " sonata-form," on a smaller scale than those of later writers. The sonata, as now understood, is a composition made up of a series of pieces, commonly three or four, arranged so as to contrast with each other in movement, and in emotional content. A symphony is simply a sonata written • for orchestra, differing from the pianoforte sonata only in being laid out on MONOPHONIC MUSIC. 31 a larger scale. Trios, quartets, quintets, concertos, etc., are composed on the same plan. They are simply sonatas for several instruments. The sepa- rate compositions of which a sonata is made up are called " movements," from the fact that they differ in the rate of speed. The more common order is as follows: The first movement is an allegro — a rapid, vigorous, spirited or lively composition, somewhat long and elaborate. The second movement is an adagio — slow, deeply tender or sad — or else an andante — pensive, tender, perhaps melancholy. The third movement is an allegretto, perhaps a stately minuet, or a playful scherzo. Both these movements are comparatively short. The last movement is a lively allegro, or, perhaps, a fiery, rushing presto, generally of considerable length. This order is often varied, but the principles of contrast involved in it must always underlie whatever order of move- ment may be adopted. But the term "Sonata- Form " in its narrow, technical sense, applies, not to the sonata as a whole, but to the form of compo- sition commonly adopted in one, or at most two of the separate movements which make up a sonata, the construction of which must now be explained. First of all, it is necessary to understand clearly what is meant by " form " in music. " Form " has to do with melody, mainly; with the rhythmical reg- ulation of successions of tones, on a large scale. Melody, in order to be intelligible, or any way satis- factory, must be begun, continued and brought to a close in accordance with some definite plan. 1 he Chap. III. u Move- ments." "Sonata- Form? "■Form. 32 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. III. Simple periods. Sections. Phrases. chief requirements of this plan, like those of any work of art, are three, viz.: Unity, Variety and Symmetry. The simplest form of composition which can give any satisfaction, regarded as a completed whole, is a single Period, the nearest analogue of which is a single couplet. A good example of this is in the church tune, " Onward, Christian Soldier," in " Hymns, Ancient and Modern." Here the period is divided into two sections, to fit the two lines of the couplet, and these two sections are bal- anced against each other, symmetrically. More commonly the two sections of a simple period are each divided by a cmsura, or point of partial repose. Indeed, such a division is plainly to be seen in the tune above cited. Each of the two di- visions of each section is then called a phrase. More frequently than otherwise, the third phrase is nearly or quite an exact repetition of the first, and the fourth similarly reminds one of the second, that is, they rhyme with each other, so that such a simple period is closely analogous to the ballad stanza. It is, in fact, the form commonly and necessarily used in setting such stanzas to music. The point of re- pose at the end of the first section (second phrase) is more marked than those which finish the first and third phrases, but is still only a half stop, or musical semicolon. The last section of course closes the period by a full stop. A good example of this form is the first period of the theme in the A major son- ata of Mozart (No. 12, Peters' edition). MONOPHONIC MUSIC. 33 Another thing must now be noticed about this period, viz. : that what gives unity to it is the repeated employment of a single melodic fragment as a pat- tern or design. The melodic idea, or "motive," of the first measure is repeated in the second, but in different pitch. The third measure is less obviously an imitation of the first, but still has nothing incongru- ous with it. The second and fourth phrases have motives differing slightly from that of the first and third, but still analogous to it, and possibly derived from it, or at least suggested by it. This use of one or a few simple motives, of which the case cited is a very simple example, is carried out on the most elaborate scale in all large compositions. In the hands of a master, this multifarious transformation of the original motive invented, prevents unity from becoming uniformity, continually presents them in new and interesting lights, and develops from them, as from germs, a complex and elaborate whole, sat- factory to the intellect and to the artistic sense. When the composer comes to add a second period to his first, this new period will most naturally be a simple one, like the first, made up of two symmetri- cal sections, balanced against each other as antece- dent and consequent. This period, however, must not be wholly new, else we should have not one compo- sition, made up of two periods, but two compositions of one complete period each, wholly unrelated. The new period must, of course, contain new materials, or at least a fresh treatment of the old ones, otherwise it would be merely a repetition of the first period, c Chap. III. Motives. Relations of periods combined into period* groups. 34 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. III. Two period groups combined into a larger whole But with variety there must also be unity. The com- mon way of uniting a second period with a first to form a composition is to make the first section of the new period new and fresh, while the second section is a more or less exact repetition of the closing section of the first period. This is precisely the plan of the Mozart example just cited, except that the second period, instead of coming to a full stop at the end of the eight measures, which would make it a simple period, is prolonged by the addition of a phrase of two measures, by which a very effective climax is produced, without in the least impairing the impression of symmetry. This form is the germ from which all the musical forms have sprung. It is in two divisions, balanced against each other as are the two sections of a sim- ple period. It may be enlarged by making each di- vision consist of a period-group of two or more simple periods united. But in the shorter forms, when each simple or prolonged period comes to a full stop, the first division is commonly one period only, the second being composed either of one or two periods, with perhaps a coda. With this is con- trasted another similar form, often called a "Trio," after which the original form is repeated, for the sake of unity. This is the form in which marches, waltzes, etc., are written. A good example of it is the andante of the sonata in C (No. 2, of the Peters edition) by Mozart. All the slow movements, minuets and scherzi of the Mozart and Beethoven MONOPHONIC MUSIC. 35 sonatas are in this form, so that examples are easily accessible. The sonata-form is the most elaborate and ex- tended of the forms which have been developed from the elementary plan given above. Like the forms heretofore cited, it has two main divisions. In its most extended form, as developed in the or- chestral symphony, each of these divisions is com- posed of several period-groups, as follows: DIVISION I. I. Principal Subject. II. Transition. III. Second Subject (in the Key of the Domin- ant). IV. Transition. V. Conclusion (in the Key of the Dominant). This division is repeated. DIVISION II. I. Elaboration, in which the ideas of the first division are turned over, modulated into different keys, presented in new lights, and combined and developed in various ways. II. Transition. III. Repetition of the whole of the first main di- vision, the second subject and conclusion being this time in the key of the Tonic. In the case of pianoforte sonatas, this form is often abbreviated, by making some of the transitions Chap. III. Plan of the sonata- form. Abbrevia- tions of this plan. 36 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. III. Form in polyphonic music. Simple periods in Bach's dances. belong to the period-groups of the main ideas, in- stead of forming separate groups, and by making the elaboration, and, in fact, nearly all the period- groups shorter than in the most elaborate works. It is to be noted also that in this form the periods which are associated in groups no longer end with full stops. These are reserved for the close of groups or even of larger divisions. The periods follow each other in continuous discourse, and are distinguished from one another not so much by the cadences as by the grouping of the ideas. This is the briefest possible outline of Form, as now developed in monophonic music. In the strict polyphonic style of Sebastian Bach, as shown in his fugues, the most important productions of that style, Form consisted in the orderly arrangement and suc- cession of the different groups formed by the sepa- rate entries of the subject and answer. Thus the " exposition " formed the first group, the second complete entry of the subject and answer made a second group, in which the voices entered in a dif- ferent order, by way of contrast. The same princi- ples of Unity, Variety and Symmetry which under- lie the construction of a modern sonata, controlled the fugue also. But there were no " periods," in the monophonic sense. But in Bach's compositions in the free style, as, for instance, in the Gavotte in D minor, in the Sixth English Suite, and in others, we find examples of simple period structure. In- deed, both this gavotte, and the "musette," which alternates with it, are almost exactly in the form of MONOPHONIC MUSIC. 37 the andante of the Mozart sonata in C, cited above. They are polyphonic in the sense that each has more than one real melody ; for the bass is a " counter- point," and not a mere foundation nor a series of accompanying arpeggios. But their form is precisely that of monophonic music, and it is so because there is one principal melody to which the counterpoint is subordinate. This melody is necessarily governed by the principles summarized in the above outline, for it is its accordance with these principles that makes it clearly intelligible. Chap. III. CHAPTER IV. CftAr. JT. C. P. E. Ba.k. His education. Settles in Berlin at the court vr**>f>w*\ translated by A. L. Alger, and published by O. Ditson &. Co., Boston. ROBERT SCHUMANN. 163 artist nature and precocious attainments of the little Clara. But this did not last long. Robert left Leipzig for Heidelberg in May, 1829, ostensibly to attend lectures on jurisprudence in the university. What he really did was to practice the piano, partly on the basis of his lessons with Wieck, study and com- pose music, play a great deal in a select circle of his student friends and a little in public, and devote himself almost exclusively to his musical and liter- ary pursuits. The most significant compositions of this year which now remain to us were numbers 1, 3, 4, 6 and 8 of the " Papillons," a series of short pieces intended to reproduce the impressions of dif- ferent scenes and incidents at a masked ball. He does not seem to have yet arrived at any de- cision as to whether he would ultimately pursue the career of a professional musician ; he simply drifted along, yielding to the impulses which moved him in the line of musical activity and almost wholly neg- lecting his law studies, for which he felt an uncon- querable aversion. But matters could not go on so. At the end of the school year something had to be settled, and by this time he had thoroughly made up his mind as to his course. He wrote to his mother, July 30, 1830, informing her of his unwill- ingness to continue his law studies and his desire to devote himself to music, begged her to write to Wieck for his opinion as to the wisdom of his change of plan, and promised to abide by his old teacher's decision. The letter was modest and Chap. IX. Removes to Heidelberg. Still neglects law and studies music. Drifts without any definite purpose in life. The crisis. 164 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chaf. IX. He returns to Leipzig to study music with Wieck. Lames his right hand. Studies with Dorn. respectful, but very decided, and his mother, unwill- ingly enough, complied with his request. Wieck's reply settled the matter. He assured Mme. Schu- mann that Robert had abilities which warranted him in expecting to become a great musician, and advised that he be thoroughly educated with this end in view. The result of it was that in a few weeks he was again in Leipzig under the guidance of his old in- structor, than whom no more competent man could have been selected. He took up his residence in Wieck's house, planning for a thorough course of study of the pianoforte. But this soon came to an end by his ill-advised attempts to shorten the pro- cess of technical attainment. Just what were the mechanical appliances he used for this purpose no one seems to know, but, at any rate, his right hand became permanently lame, and he was forced to turn his attention exclusively to composition. His previous efforts in this field, although exhibiting innate power and originality, and displaying the peculiar bent of his mind, had been crude, and he himself had begun to see the necessity of solid theo- retical study and practice. By Wieck's advice he put himself under the instruction of Heinrich Dorn, then conductor of the opera and a sound musician, and entered upon the study of harmony and coun- terpoint with great enthusiasm. His lessons with Dorn profited him greatly, but he was nearly twenty-two years old and had lost much precious time. At the same age Mendelssohn ROBERT SCHUMANN. 165 was one of the most accomplished musicians in Europe, while Schumann found that the years in which it might have been possible for him to acquire a similar mastery of the technic of composition had passed forever. He never gained any such freedom and facility of expression or command of his musi- cal materials as characterized his future colleague in the Leipzig conservatory. Schumann soon left Wieck's house, though his r intimacy with the family continued, and lived much as other students did. He worked hard days and devoted his evenings to recreation with his friends. Socially he was reserved, or rather impassive, un- responsive, and to all outward appearance apathetic; but his intimates knew that this lethargic exterior covered a sensibility extremely open to impressions of every sort, a keen and subtle perception, a vigor- ous intellect, a strong sense of humor, a vivid imagination especially delighting in the fantastic and the fanciful, and strong, deep feeling. These qualities found their fullest revelation and most characteristic embodiment in his music. His "Papillons" ("Butterflies"), op. 2, begun in Heidel- berg and finished in Leipzig in 1831, are thoroughly characteristic of his nature and tendencies. They are, in form, a mere series of short pieces, some of them of no great intrinsic significance, but with a poetic intention underlying the separate pieces and the arrangement of them, to which Schumann has given us a clue only by a hint or two, and by a few words of explanation in the last number of the series. Chap. IX. His man- ners and social rela- tions. His" Pap- illons " ckarac'ter* istic. i66 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. IX. They suggest the scenes of a masked ball. They show clearly the poetic bent of his mind But this last is sufficient to show clearly that he intended these pieces to express different phases of feeling induced by the scenes of a masquerade. The short opening number seems to express the mood appropriate to the first impression made by the lighted ball-room with its throng of pleasure seekers; No. 2 shows us the antics of a harlequin; No. 3, a general promenade or procession of the maskers; No. 7, a tender dialogue between two lovers, followed in No. 8 by the most blissful of waltzes, thoroughly poetic and profoundly suggest- ive; No. 1 2 shows us the party breaking up during the final dancing of the " Grandfather " minuet; while the town clock strikes six, the sounds gradually die away one after the other. The remaining numbers are much less suggestive of definite scenes, but those above mentioned can hardly be mistaken. These " Papillons " are interesting and important mainly as showing the bent of his mind toward con- necting his music with more or less definitely con- ceived scenes. This tendency shows itself plainly in many of his works, notably in the Davidsbuendler, op. 6 ; The Carnival, op. 9 ; the Fantasy pieces, op. 12; the Scenes from Childhood, op. 15; the Vienna Carnival Pranks, op. 26; the Album for Youth, op. 68; the Forest Scenes, op. 82, and the Album Leaves, op. 124. It is true, he himself has cautioned us, somewhat obscurely, against carrying our literalness of interpretation too far, saying that some of the titles in the Scenes from Childhood were added after the pieces were written, instead of ROBERT SCHUMANN. 167 serving beforehand as images which raised the feel- ings embodied in the music. But his applying the titles showed that he considered them sufficiently appropriate to serve as more or less accurate guides and helps in interpretation, and proves none the less conclusively the poetic tendency of his mind, and his proneness to link scenes and feelings together in his music. That he often did not connect them except in a vague way is thoroughly characteristic. Schumann was a strong but not a clear thinker, and seldom attained complete mastery of his thought or definite, clear, finished expression, either in music or in literary composition. His was one of those somewhat exasperating yet stimulating minds, of which so many are to be found even among the greatest poets and philosophers of Germany, whose ideas are hopelessly befogged, although they evi- dently have ideas extremely significant and perhaps all the more attractive that they are incompletely revealed. These minds struggle with their thought, they show unquestionable power, and the very vio- lence of the effort convinces us of the greatness of the ideas; but they are never completely triumphant; they never fully succeed in dragging out into clear daylight and exhibiting in its full proportions what they have discovered; more remains than they themselves have perceived, much less displayed to others; the whole is attractive but tantalizing. This will be best appreciated by those who have tried to make their way through the obscure pages of Hegel in the hope of understanding him. Such are apt Chap. IX, Schumann a strong but not a clear thinker. i68 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. IX. Schumann aims to suggest images by his music. The "Etudes Symjrhon- taues." Their extraor- dinary power. to come away convinced that the great philosopher was a long way from understanding his own writing, but also convinced that he had found much worth understanding, and feeling that, on the whole, the attempt had been a bracing, stimulating intellectual effort, not without result in increase of strength and enlargement of ideas Schumann undoubtedly aimed often, if not gen- erally, at the utmost definiteness of emotional ex- pression, and often aimed, too, at suggesting definite images by means of expressing in tones the emo- tional impression made by such images. So that when he inscribes a title which irresistibly suggests a scene or event, we are fairly entitled to follow out the connection with the music as definitely as we can, in the absence of information or direction to the contrary. Enough will remain obscure when we have found every imaginable point of contact. It is perhaps not important here to mention Schumann's minor compositions in detail. Those between the " Papillons " and the " Etudes Sym- phoniques," op. 13, are of comparatively little importance. These " Etudes, in the form of Varia- tions," were written in 1834, and are not only a great advance on any of his previous works but are among the most profoundly significant and atractive of all his compositions. The gain is not specially in clearness of statement, but in fertility of inven- tion, in wealth of suggestion and in the irresistible impression of depth and power of feeling, intellect and character which they make. In these there is ROBERT SCHUMANN. 169 no trace of the lachrymose sentimentality so plenti- ful in his letters ; the Schumann of the " Etudes Symphoniques " is hardly to be recognized as the author of the letters to Henrietta Voigt on pages 88- 90 of Wasielwski's Life, for example; there is, to be sure, the same fantastic, obscure imagining and moods more or less akin, but the music is vastly stronger and more manly than the letters appear to be. Yet both are productions of the same man at about the same time. In form, these " Etudes," though called "varia- tions " are very far from conforming to the accepted models, and indeed most of them have so little formal relation to the theme that the term "variation" is almost a misnomer. They are rather Schumann's comments on the original subject (which, by the way, is not his own, but was written by the father of of one of his young lady friends, Baroness Ernestine von Fricken) — pieces suggested to his imagination by the mood of this theme. This work was immediately followed by the "Car- nival," op. 9, another attempt to express in short pieces a series of moods appropriate to a masquer- ade. The two Sonatas, op. n and op. 22, belong to the year 1835. They are much less successful than the pieces just mentioned. Schumann was no master either of the sonata form or of the art of the- matic treatment, and his genius was hampered by the classical harness. The op. 22 is much the better of the two. Between this time and the time of his marriage to Chap. IX. The "Car- nival" of.Q. 170 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. IX. His "works from 06.1b to op. so. Schu- mann's disfavor with- Wieck. Clara Wieck, in 1840, he wrote the "Kreisleriana," op. 16 (so named from their imaginary connection with Kapellmeister Kreisler, in E. T. A. Hoffmann's fantastic romance, " Kater Murr "), the noble "Fantasia," op. 17; the " Novelettes," op. 21, the "Fantasy Pieces," op. 12; the "Scenes from Child- hood," op. 15; "Arabeske," op. 18; " Flower Piece," op. 19; "Humoreske," op. 20; "Night Pieces.' op. 23; "Vienna Carnival Pranks," op. 26, and other pieces of minor importance. This list comprises nearly all his significant works for the pianoforte alone. They were largely the product of a time of mental agitation due to his love affairs. He had wished to marry Ernestine von Fricken and had been very intimate with her when she lived at Wieck's. But for some unex- plained reason the connection was broken off, she went home, Schumann fell under Wieck's displea- sure and ceased to visit the family. Meanwhile he fell in love with Clara, and after a while she recipro- cated his affections, but her father would never con- sent to receive Schumann as his son-in-law. When the young couple finally did marry, Schumann had to resort to the courts to get possession of his. bride. But Schumann's love affairs and activity in com- position by no means occupied all his attention. He was thoroughly disgusted with the shallow criti- cism and the equally shallow appreciation of music. at that time prevalent in Leipzig and elsewhere- The popular pianoforte composers were Kalkbrenner,, ROBERT SCHUMANN. 171 Huenten, Herz, Czerny and men of that stamp, whose only merit consisted in a certain amount of pleasing melodiousness without depth of feeling or intelli- gence. These were, in university student parlance, " Philistines," the natural enemies of originality, genius, and the vigorous individual life which char- acterized the young Romanticists. Against all pedants, shallow, self-seeking virtuosi and empty - headed, frivolous pianoforte tinklers Schumann determined to wage vigorous war, and entered the field of criticism. In 1834 he, in company with a few like-minded associates, among whom was Wieck, founded the " New Journal of Music " (Neue Zeitschrift fuer Musik), and edited it for ten years. It at once became a great power in musical matters, profoundly influenced public opinion, and introduced to Germany many new writers, among them Chopin, Berlioz, Gade, Stephen Heller, Adolph Henseult, Robert Franz and Sterndale Bennett. Schumann's own writing was much of it fantastic arid fanciful; he personified the two sides of his nature under the names of Flor- estan and Eusebius, and his associates Wieck and Carl Banck under those of Raro and Serpentinus, and these imaginary characters are continually ap- pearing in the pages of the journal. The name " Davidsbuendler " or "David and his confederates" also appears, and his " Carnival" contains a "March of the Davidsbuendler against the Philistines." But if he wrote fancifully and more or less obscurely, his criticisms are almost always striking and suggest- Chap. IX. The "Phil- istines.^ Schumann founds and edits the '"Neue Zeitschrift fuer Musik." 172 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. IX. His collected •works. His songs. The piano- forte Quin- tet, op. 44, and Quar- tet op. iff. "Gene- vieve." ive, and many of them are very clear and forcible. Most of them have been translated into English by Mrs. Fanny Raymond Ritter, and are published in two volumes under the title " Music and Musicians." To these the reader is referred for further knowl- edge of Schumann's work as a critic. From the date of his marriage, Schumann's work as a composer concerns this history but little. In that year his emotions found vent in the production of a large number of songs, some of them among the most poetic and imaginative ever written, truth- ful in characterization, surcharged with profound feeling, and of great beauty. He then began to write for orchestra, and henceforth to the end of his life the piano occupied with him a subordinate place. But among the comparatively few pianoforte com- positions of the last sixteen years of his life, there are three very important ones. These are the Piano- forte Quintet, op. 44, the Quartet, op. 47' and the A minor concerto, op. 54, all of them beautiful, sig- nificant and original; so much so, indeed, that they can hardly be said to have been surpassed in power by even Beethoven's best work, though they fall far short of the finish of the older master. Besides his songs and orchestral work he also wrote an opera, " Genevieve," which shows great creative power, but has fatal defects as a musical drama, and two cantatas, one " Paradise and the Peri," founded on an episode in Moore's " Lalla Rookh," and the other an adaption of Byron's " Manfred," besides works of minor importance. ROBERT SCHUMANN. 173 In 1843, at Mendelssohn's invitation, he joined him as a teacher of composition, etc., in the newly founded Leipzig conservatory. But this connection did not long continue. Schumann was no teacher ; had no power of expressing ideas in speech or of communicating information ; was always silent, and apparently apathetic in the class-room as in society. This tendency even increased after his marriage. In his domestic relations he was happy. Clara Schumann was a woman of genius, the daughter of a man who had known how to develop her gifts in the wisest way ; her culture was broad and deep ; she was, and still remains (1883), at past sixty, one of the greatest and finest of interpretative artists in an age exceptionally productive of great virtuosi ; she was not only exceptionally fitted to be the compan- ion of a great creative mind like Robert Schumann's in all his intellectual and artistic interests and activ- ities, but was a domestic, homelike wife and mother, who stood between her husband and outside annoy- ances and interruptions, made a delightful, happy, restful home for him and their eight children, and was in every way a woman who commanded and still commands the respect, admiration and love of all who have the felicity of knowing her personally, as well as of thousands who only know her by her admirable performances and her reputation. The present writer looks back upon some concerts of hers with the Gewandhaus orchestra, some sixteen years ago, as among the greatest privileges and most delightful experiences of his life. Chap.IX. His connection •with the Leipzig Con$erva~ tory. Character of his wife. i74 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. IX. Schu- mann's domestic happiness. His Con- ductorship at Duessel- dorf. Insanity and death. With such domestic surroundings it is not to be wondered at that Schumann felt less than ever any inclination for general society. He stayed at home and devoted himself to composition, occasionally going on a concert tour with his wife, who still desired to play in public. In 1844, Schumann gave up his paper and re- moved to Dresden. He had already begun to feel the disease which finally destroyed his reason and his life ; it was afterwards found to be an abnormal growth of bone into the substance of the brain ; it caused him intense pain and occasioned a morbid state of feeling and of mental activity. In 1850 he was called to Duesseldorf as director of concerts and church music and accepted the post. But he was never a good conductor, and the progress of his disease made him even less successful than formerly, so that after some three years, a period prolonged somewhat out of consideration for his feelings, the connection terminated. He had almost reached the end. Decided symp- toms of insanity developed more and more rapidly and culminated in an attempt at suicide. On Feb- ruary 27, 1854, while sitting in social intercourse with his physician and another friend, he left the room, without a word, went to the bridge and threw himself into the Rhine. He was rescued, but his mind was gone. He was removed to a private asylum near Bonn, and died there July 29, 1856. A brief comparison of the three great composers whose creative activity determined the course of ROBERT SCHUMANN. 175 Musical History in the Romantic Epoch must close this chapter. All three were subjective ; each con- sciously and deliberately sought to reproduce his emotional life in tones ; each embodied in his com- positions his most peculiar experiences ; so that in the music of each is revealed his innermost life and character. Of the three, Mendelssohn was the most healthy and wholesome ; dealt less with social emotions of the feverish, abnormally exciting sort ; was closer to nature, too, and to the healthiest literature. His Midsummer Night's Dream music is perhaps his most characteristic work, where he deals with nature in her romantic aspects ; his imagination is kindled by the solemn grandeur of the forest, the mysterious gloom and silence of night, broken only by the cry of night birds and of insects, the dewy, moonlit glades, the flowery nooks, the thick coverts, the fairy train of Oberon and Titania, with mischievous Puck and the other attendants, the lovers whose transitory mishaps only enhance the charm of the scene, the clumsy clowns rehearsing their play, Bottom, with the ass's head and the fairy queen's ridiculous infat- uation with him. But hardly less characteristic are his lovely, romantic four-part songs, his overtures and sympho- nies. The love of natural scenery reappears in these works and in the Walpurgis Night, and his oratorios show a noble, elevated religious life, such as nowhere appears in Schumann or Chopin. The majestic figure of the Prophet and the fiery enthusi- Chap. IX. The Romantic writers compared. Mendels- sohn, Love of Nature shown in Midsum- merNight'z Dream. A religious life shown in his Oratorios. 176 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. IX. Chopin. His emo- tions caused by the ex- citements of worldly society. asm of the Apostle inspired him as no similar char- acters affected his two romantic contemporaries. The social emotions, too, expressed in his songs, with and without words, are natural and under rational control, never become overmastering pas- sions, are always the revelation of a happy, sunny, joyous, yet serious and thoughtful nature. Chopin, on the other hand, has little apparent relation either to nature or to religion. His emo- tional life is conditioned solely on social relations, and those not always of the healthiest or most ele- vated. He is sometimes morbidly intense, delirious, passionate ; there is pleasure intoxicating to the verge of delirium ; his pain, grief and despair occa- sionally border on insanity ; in short, the passions of Polish and Parisian society, the whole emotional life of a passionate, worldly, intellectual, refined, luxurious, pleasure-seeking aristocracy is mirrored in his music. It impresses us, too, with a sense of what it would be somewhat unjust to call weakness or effeminacy ; it is rather a deficiency of robustness and virility, a character tender, refined, almost fem- inine, but yet with a vast reserve fund of power and with a certain positiveness and vigor which goes far to make up for his over-sensitiveness and suscepti- bility to outside influences. Above all, Chopin is always an artist; his sense of beauty is keen and subtle; his feeling for form is an unerring instinct; his power of invention, both in melody and harmony, is unsurpassed; and the ex- quisite beauty of many, indeed most, of his works ROBERT SCHUMANN. 177 will for long remain a source of delight to connois- seurs. Schumann's greatest deficiencies, as already pointed out, are lack of clearness, definiteness, con- centration, and imperfect mastery of his means of expression. What he had to express, however, was an emotional life more virile, robust, powerful than that of either Chopin or Mendelssohn. The fire of Chopin's passion glowed with equal intensity, but the impulse it gave was more fitful and spasmodic. Schumann's feeling rushes on with all-compelling, resistless force; even when imperfectly revealed it is Titanic; if we sometimes get no more than glimpses of his passion, even these convince us that there is not only intensity but mass of heat, like a vast furnace full of molten metal, from which indeed run great masses of slag and dross, but these are the very result and product of huge purification. With all his passion, his intense longing, strong out-reaching desire, earnest striving, headlong im- pulse, there is a sense of repose which comes only from the working of a great force. The passion of Chopin is violent, rushing, impet- uous, but carries less weight. Or, to change the figure — Schumann's passion rolls in great, deep-sea waves, which break on rocky cliffs in thunderous roar of overwhelming surf ; Chopin's is a narrow tropical sea, beautiful in calm and sunshine, but fruitful of sudden hurricanes and violent storms, of deafening thunder and blinding electric flashes; Mendelssohn's is an inland lake, not too deep to be Chap. IX. Schumann. His profound and vigorous feelings. Com- parison of the passion of the three writers. 178 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. IX. easily fathomed, with charming, quiet bays and en- ticing nooks haunted by sprites and elves, a veritable fairy domain, the abode of grace and beauty. All three are to be counted among the world's great and precious treasures. "Romantic" they are, certainly; but if it can ever be possible to judge of the per- manence of any contemporary Art, then may we surely expect that these three great masters will by and by be counted as " classics." At any rate their place in musical history is unmistakable. PAKT FOUKTH. The Development of Piano- EOKTE TeCHNIC. CHAPTER X. THE TECHNIC OF THE FIRST CLASSICAL PERIOD. When the harpsichord was invented we know not. But we do know that the organ preceded it. The harpsichord seems to have been, at first, a mere household substitute for the organ, which latter instrument was, of course, too large and expensive to be used anywhere except in churches, monas- teries and other large places for public assemblies. The harpsichord was at first a resource of organists for home practice and gradually found its way into popular use. At first, organ music was transferred to it, and no account was taken of its peculiar capabilities. For a long time pieces were written " for the organ or harpsichord," and even at the time of Bach and Haendel harpsichord players were almost always organists as well. And not only so, but these play- ers seem to have considered the organ as so much superior that they devoted little attention to the harpsichord, regarding it as a mere auxiliary, subor- dinate to their main interests. But the striking difference between the capacities of the two instruments must have suggested to some of these players that there might be something in the harpsichord worth cultivating. So long as scien- Chap. X. Relation of the harpsi- chord to thl organ. Beginning* of harpsi- chord music proper. l82 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. X. Shortness of tone necessitated ornaments. fjfccl of lack .y wnority. tific music was almost exclusively confined to the service of the church, so long the organ retained its exclusive supremacy. But when opera was invented, in the sixteenth century, and the harpsichord not only came into prominent use in the orchestra, but had to serve for the accompaniments of recitatives and arias, its importance increased. Compositions began to be written which took into account its special peculiarities ; its evanescent tones, its lack of sonority and its lightness and shallowness of touch as compared with the clumsy actions of the organs of the period. The shortness of the tones precluded the cultiva- tion of the lyric quality and suggested the appropri- ateness of rapid passages as the staple element of compositions intended for that instrument. When tones had to be prolonged they were trilled or fur- nished with turns, mordents, prall-trills or appoggia- turas. These were borrowed from the vocal embell- ishments of the time, but were not mere ornaments, as in the case of arias, etc. ; they served to supply the defect of shortness of tone in the instrument, and so were an important element in harpsichord music. The second peculiarity, lack of sonority, owing to the lightness of the strings and the impossibility of producing a powerful tone by plucking a string with a quill, precluded any broad, majestic effects, and contributed to the adoption of light and rapid pass- ages and embellishments as the main peculiarities of harpsichord music. TECHNIC OF THE FIRST CLASSICAL PERIOD. 183 Lastly, the lightness of the action pointed in the same direction. Harpsichord technic, then, involved light and rapid playing of scales and arpeggios and of all sorts of finger passages, including trills and other embellishments. It required independence and flex- ibility of the fingers and great dexterity, but not strength. But there was no employment of extended scales and arpeggios as there is in our modern music. In the first place, these instruments were much smaller in compass than our modern pianofortes, rarely exceeding five octaves. Then, too, the prevalent music was polyphonic, and extended passages were impossible in fugue playing. Each hand had generally to perform two or more voice-parts at the same time, and this involved the necessity of writing them within a nar- row range of notes. It was perhaps owing to this fact that the finger- ing of single scale passages in vogue at that time was so crude and clumsy. As late as the last decade of the seventeenth century the rules laid down in the instruction books for fingering scales required them to be played with two fingers only ; the third (middle) and fourth in ascending aud the third and second in descending. The use of all five fingers was a result of the development of monophonic playing, or, what is, for technical purposes, the same thing, of the employ- ment of long passages for only one voice for a single Chap. X. What was involved in harpsi- chord technic. Limi- tations. Crude fingering. How iin- jirovements were made. 1 84 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. X. Back's free polyphony. A rtistic capabilities of the clavichord. hand, in free polyphony. The hand, not being ham- pered by the necessity of playing two or more voices, could indulge in much greater freedom of execution, and out of this gradually came florid monophony, culminating at last in our day in the difficult passages of Thalberg, Liszt and others. Of this style of free polyphony involving florid monophonic passages Sebastian Bach was as great a master as he was of strict polyphonic playing. In the latter he was unrivaled. He was not only the greatest composer of fugues, but the greatest player of fugues. In the art of delivering several melo- dies simultaneously he surpassed all his predeces- sors and contemporaries. This art involved the fre- quent changing of fingers on one key and the slid- ing of the fingers from one key to another, so as to produce a perfect connection between the tones. The greatest defect of the harpsichord for fugue playing was the impossibility of discriminative em- phasis. The clavichord was somewhat superior in this respect. It was possible to make some slight difference in the power of the tones of this instru- ment, to emphasize somewhat the entrance of a fugue subject or answer, and to discriminate one melody or passage from another by greater or less force of delivery. Above all, it was superior to the harpsichord in lyric quality, in the possibility of pro- longing the tones beyond a mere tinkle, and impart- ing to them something of singing effect. Accordingly, the clavichord was a favorite instru- ment with Sebastian Bach, as having finer artistic TECHNIC OF THE FIRST CLASSICAL PERIOD. i85 capabilities than either the harpsichord or the piano- fortes of his day. The action of the latter was still too imperfect and clumsy to satisfy his requirements. The mechanism of the pianoforte is necessarily complicated, and it was thirty or forty years after Bach's death before it finally superseded the older instruments. Sebastian Bach's technic, then, was the technic of the harpsichord, and especially of the clavichord. In him polyphonic playing, as well as polyphonic writing, culminated. All that could be done on the instruments of his time he did. He attained the utmost independence of finger, the utmost ease, lightness, fluency ; his dexterity in interweaving con- trapuntal parts was perfection itself; he employed all five fingers in passages when they could be used to advantage, disregarding the pedantic rules of his time ; he made the most of the lyric capabilities of the clavichord. In short, like most original minds, he was an innovator, discovering all the possibilities of the instruments he used and inventing new means of accomplishing his ends. Haendel was also a great organist and harpsi- chordist, but devoted most of his life to the produc- tion of Italian opera. His harpsichord technic, as far as it goes, differs in no essential particular from Bach's. Domenico Scarlatti seems to have had more of the virtuoso spirit, in the sense in which that term is used in Germany at the present day. A virtuoso, in this sense, is one who puts the | 8* Chap. X. Back's technic. HaendeVs technic. Scarlatti' 3 virtuosity. 1 86 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. X. The true artist. The virtuoso. The artist spirit. mastery of technical difficulties and the display of his technical attainments above those aims which the real artist regards as paramount. The true artist has in view, first of all, the worthy embodiment of a worthy ideal. As an interpretative artist he holds it his paramount duty to render truthfully the conceptions of any composer whose works he takes upon himself to represent to others, selecting the works of no composer whose genius he does not respect, treating them reverently and interpreting them with conscientious fidelity, so far as he can ascertain the composer's intention. The virtuoso, on the other hand, is apt to use his attainments primarily as a means of glorifying him- self in the eyes of others. Whatever he writes is apt to be written with reference to the display of his. attainments, to the production of astonishing and sen- sational effects, that he may gain glory for himself. His performances of the compositions of others are apt to be characterized by the same dominant pur- pose. "Effect" is the watchword of the virtuoso. He does not like to play pieces, however noble or significant, which are not "effective." He is apt to desecrate the noblest works of the greatest genius by additions and alterations intended solely for show. The spirit of the artist is one of self-abnegation,, of devotion to ideal aims. The virtuoso is primarily an egotist, using his technical attainments as a. means not to the faithful setting forth of noble con- ceptions, but for his own personal aggrandizement. TECHNIC OF THE FIRST CLASSICAL PERIOD. 187 But, although there are abundant examples of both classes of players, there are perhaps few artists who play much in public without sometimes being tempted to sacrifice something of the higher inter- ests they are called to represent, to the desire for applause, and perhaps there are few virtuosi who do not sometimes feel impelled to use their splendid gifts and acquirements for high ends. It is a ques- tion, in each individual case, of predominant ten- dency and habitual intention. As regards Domenico Scarlatti, it would doubt- less be very unjust to represent him as a virtuoso pure and simple, in the sense in which that word has just been explained. But there is much in his com- positions which seems to have been conditioned, not on any inward necessity of expression, but on the desire to overcome technical difficulties and to display his mastery of them. There are passages exceedingly troublesome to players even now, which seem to serve no ideal end, but to exist solely for the sake of difficulty. The most conspicuous examples of this are pas- sages where the hands are crossed very rapidly, as in the sonata No. 10 of Koehler's edition (see Chap- ter I). But whatever we may think of the intel- lectual or artistic worth of this sort of work, it undoubtedly contributed much to the mastery of technic, and especially to the development of the monophonic style of playing. Chap. X. Evidences of the virtuoso spirit. CHAPTER XI. THE TECHNIC OF THE SECOND CLASSICAL PERIOD. Chap. XI. The change in technic gradual. Character- istics of the Vienna pianoforte. When we compare the sonatas of Scarlatti, the suites of Haendel and the suites, partitas, sonatas and concertos of Sebastian Bach with the sonatas of Emanuel Bach, we find no sudden change in technical qualities. Indeed, the development of the technic of the pianoforte was a slow and gradual process, and neither Emanuel Bach, Haydn nor Mozart ever fully recognized the peculiar capacities of the new instrument. All three were bred harp- sichordists, and even in the Mozart concertos, the culmination of technic in these three authors, most of the passages are perfectly practicable for the harpsichord. In these works, as in those of Haydn and Emanuel Bach, we find the same demand for lightness and fluency which characterized the con- certos and other compositions of Sebastian Bach's time. This was, in part, due to the fact that the Vienna pianofortes had very light actions, modeled on those of the harpsichords then in use. The ideals of pianoforte technic and effects were drawn from the experience of harpsichord players, modified only by the single consideration of the possibility of shading. But this capacity for varying the power of tones z88 TECHNIC OF THE SECOND CLASSICAL PERIOD. 189 was an element which gradually enlarged the ideas of players as to the possible effects derivable from it, and, after a while, led to great changes in the con- struction of the instrument. Nevertheless, Vienna was not the place where these modifications first suggested themselves ; the Viennese players and composers continued for a long time to be the exponents of a smooth, easy-going, superficial style of technic and of playing, and the Viennese pianofortes continued to be very light in action and lacking in sonority, making small de- mands on the power and endurance of players, and incapable of broad or powerful effects. From the above judgment of Viennese composers, Beethoven, and in a less degree, Schubert must be excepted. More of these hereafter. The most important service rendered by Emanuel Bach, Haydn and Mozart in the development of pianoforte technic was their progressive recognition of the lyric element. The adagios in the sonatas of Emanuel Bach were distinct attempts to improve upon the singing effects already attained on the clavichord. They were probably calculated for that instrument, at least quite as much as for the piano- forte, for, although Bach played both instruments, and the harpsichord as well, he is said always to have preferred certain effects obtainable on the clavichord to any of those which could be produced by the pianofortes of his day. The most peculiar of these effects was the "Bebung," a peculiar tremulous effect produced by Chap. XI. The Vienna technic. Develop- ment of thl lyric element. The "■Beiung.' 190 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XI. How Haydn and Mozart developed technic. a rapid repetition of slight pressure on the key. The " Tangent," which was in contact with the string as long as the key was held down, transmit- ted this vibratory motion to the string, producing an effect probably analogous to that with which we are familiar in the playing of violinists and violon- cellists. But although Bach preferred the clavichord for the performance of his lyric pieces, the stress he laid upon the lyric element in playing must have tended strongly to develop the lyric capabilities of the pianoforte, an instrument which was now rapidly growing in favor, so much so as to fairly supersede the older instruments about the time of Emanuel Bach's death (1788). Haydn and Mozart also cultivated the lyric ele- ment of the pianoforte. Their works show a steady development of it. Haydn modeled on Bach, and Mozart on Bach and Haydn, and in the Mozart sona- tas and concertos we find what was probably a full and complete recognition of the lyric possibilities of the small, light Viennese pianofortes of his time. The extended scale and arpeggio passages of the Mozart concertos also show a distinct recognition of the capabilities of light and shade peculiar to the pianoforte, although their relation to the harpsi- chord is almost as close as their relation to the newer instruments. But there was an Italian contemporary of his who, though he was no such original genius as Mozart, rendered more important service than he in TECHNIC OF THE SECOND CLASSICAL PERIOD. 191 the development of pianoforte technics This was Muzio Clementi ( 1752-1832), an artist and virtu- oso who occupies somewhat the same relation to Mozart and' Haydn that Domenico Scarlatti did to Bach and Haendel. He was born at Rome, went to England in his childhood and spent most of his lifetime there. His eighty years were full of honorable and useful activ- ity. He was a thorough musician, an excellent composer, so far as technical attainments went, and had very marked talent, so much, indeed, that no less a judge than Beethoven preferred his sonatas to Mozart's. He composed about a hundred sonatas, the same number of studies (Gradus ad Parnassum), besides symphonies, choruses, etc. He was a superior teacher, and formed some of the finest pianists of the next generation ; among them J. B. Cramer, John Field, Alex. Klengel and Ludwig Berger. He also conducted Italian opera in London, and engaged in the manufacture of pianofortes. In early life, he aimed at brilliant execution, and especially cultivated difficult playing in double thirds, fourths, sixths and octaves. He after- wards acquired a broad cantabile and a nobler and more artistic style generally. He was a pianist rather than a harpsichordist, and was really the first of the great players of whom this could be said. He preferred the English .pianofortes with their heavy action, and adapted his playing and his com- positions to these instruments. Chap. XI. Clemently 175S-I$31. As flayer. 192 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XI. Clementi 's tecknic as related to English piano- fortes. His importance in the history of technic. These English pianos had greater sonority th#n those of Vienna ; the heavier stroke suggested heavier strings and a larger sounding-board, and they required a technic approaching that of the modern instruments. It is Clementi's great con- tribution to pianoforte technics that he fully appre- hended the requirements and capacities of the best English instruments of his day, and in his playing, teaching, and composing, gave them adequate recog- nition. The whole fabric of modern pianoforte technic rests on the Gradus ad Parnassum. Up to the com- positions of Chopin, Liszt and Schumann, there is nothing for which these studies do not afford an adequate foundation. Even the Beethoven Fifth Concerto does not go beyond the Clementi technic, in its principles or its extreme difficulty. Clementi's lifetime covers a period from seven years before the death of Haendel to four years after that of Beethoven and up to within two years of the establishment of the Neue Zeitschrift fuer Musik by Schumann. He lived through the whole epoch of the development of the sonata, its culminatiop and transformation, and into the very sunrise of the Romantic epoch. CHAPTER XII. THE TECHNIC OF THE TRANSITION PERIOD. We have already seen that Clementi, the most important factor in the classical technic, lived not only through the first classical period, but through the transition period as well. He was born four years earlier than Mozart and died four years later than Beethoven. Moreover, the most important part of his work was done between the dates of Mozart's death and that of Beethoven. Although the romantic ideals were pressing into the foreground, the whole technic of the transition period was classical. We have already noticed that Beethoven's most difficult concerto is amply pro- vided for in dementi's technic. Beethoven did, indeed, embody a content in the greatest of his works, for the interpretation of which the full resources of our modern instruments are no more than sufficient. In this respect his work is prophetic. But the essential elements of his tech- nic are all to be found in the Gradus of Clementi. One of the most noticeable points of his early tech- nic is his use of rapid successions of chords, as in the Sonata in C, op. 2, No. 3. This is evidently borrowed from Clementi, who was, at that time, his favorite model. Chap. XII. The technic of the period classical. Beethoven! x technic. *93 19^ HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XII. Technic of Schubert and Weber. All tecknic either classical or romantic in prin- ciple. Use of the damper pedal. The technic of Schubert and Weber was also based on that of Clementi. The latter, however, made use of extended chords in a way wholly original, an example which has been followed since. He also used the octave glissando in his " Concert - Stueck," a mere virtuoso trick, which has remained wholly without influence on practice since. In general, it may be said that not only the con- temporaries of Clementi, but all classical players and composers since, have based their technic on his Gradus ad Pamassum. Some of them, like Moscheles, for example, have seized upon points which he had treated but briefly and have elaborated them at great length and in detail. Many individ- ual peculiarities of treatment and style are also to be found, and the classical players of the Romantic period could hardly remain wholly unaffected by the innovations of the Romantic composers. But, in principle, all classical technic is to be found in Clementi ; and all ' in our modern playing which cannot be accounted for on his principles can be referred to Liszt and the other Romanti- cists. In one single point of technic have players, not distinctively Romantic, gone beyond dementi's practice or suggestion, viz., the use of the damper pedal. Beethoven used it considerably, and Mos- cheles (1784-1870) still more extensively. Henselt (born 1814) still further enlarged the domain of the pedal, and Thalberg (181 2-1 871), who cannot be THE TECHNIC OF THE TRANSITION PERIOD. 195 classed as either a classicist or romanticist, but is the culmination of the "Philistine" school of shallow players, of which Czerny and Kalkbrenner were distinguished representatives, carried the *ise of it to its extreme limits. Chap. XII. CHAPTER XIII. THE TECHNIC OF THE ROMANTIC PERIOD. Chap. XIII. Persistence pf classical technic in the roman- tic period. We have alr-eady seen that the classical school of playing persisted after the advent of the great Romanticists. Kalkbrenner (i 788-1849), one of the greatest of the classical virtuosi, died in the same year with Chopin. Moscheles (1 794-1 870) outlived all the Romanticists. Hiller was born in 181 1, Thalberg in 181 2 and Henselt in 18 14. Of these three only Thalberg is dead, and even he out- lived all the great Romanticists except Liszt. Be- sides these there is a host of players who are classi- cists by tradition and principle. These followers of the methods of classical tech- nic were, indeed, more or less affected by the Romantic influences which surrounded them, but these influences showed themselves rather in at- tempts at characterization and the embodiment of a Romantic content than in any borrowing of the pecu- liar effects of the distinctively Romantic technic. In- deed, Mendelssohn himself was essentially a classicist in much of his technic, no less than in the clearness of his forms. Even in the Songs without Words, there is little which cannot be referred back to the techni- cal principles of Clementi. These principles depended mainly on the con- 196 THE TECHNIC OF THE ROMANTIC PERIOD. 197 struction of compositions from five-finger passages, scales and arpeggios. The rules of fingering required that a five-key position should always be taken when possible ; that a position once taken should not be changed unnecessarily ; that all pas- sages derived from scales and arpeggios should be fingered like the arpeggios or scales on which they were founded ; that the thumb and little finger, being shorter than the others, should not be used on black keys, except in positions where their shortness produced no disadvantage. These principles suf- fice for playing all classical compositions in the monophonic style. But Mendelssohn, in many of his Songs without Words, introduced passages where a melody with an accompaniment to be played by the same hand could be delivered properly only by changing the fingers on successive keys while holding them down with a continuous clinging pressure. This changing of fingers was not wholly new, for Bach had used it in polyphonic playing, and occa- sional instances of it had occurred since, in de- menti's works and elsewhere ; but with Mendelssohn it assumed new and greater importance. His Songs without Words became the fashion, served as mod- els to many composers, and intensified the already great and growing interest in the purely lyric style. This interest was greatly heightened by the lyric pieces of Chopin. But Chopin's relation to technic was much more important than Mendelssohn's. He was an innovator ; as original in his technical meth- Chap.XIII. Rules 0/ fingering. Mendels- sohn's technic. The cling- ing touch* Chopin' s technic. Its originality. 198 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC Chap. XIII. Schu- mann's technic. Its difficulties. the legato playing of chromatic pa ssages, esg ecially TrTbfcubTe jfiir5s7aSiO>ther [nTeTyals, bj^ putting the ing and^hetjnrd_,.anrl fourth Qy er_th e_fifth„irj. He showed how to produce a smooth, even chain of tones ig_arpeggios .dispersed jnjvide intervals, and in extended chords. H" wrptft arp^f- assins ods and treatment as he was in his id eas and his oro ughly under- harmonies? s tood h ow to write for the pianofort.gu-and-ho3K_to produce effects hjtjiej^jjja&tfcaiasd. JjeJm,pjo.ued gibs so interspersg'd wiLlT^assTng^nqtes^afid~apjiQg- glatiTraTTKaTrin rnlp»; nf "fingenngj-ireYJously knnyn wouia apjWHEcT ayed with ease and certainty. "~ ScTTulnann'^TSo — t!aa''a peculiar technic, but one which seemed, at least, less perfectly adapted to the requirements and resources of the pianoforte. Ap- parently, his innovations were not, like Chopin's, based on a thorough mastering of all previous tech- nical achievements and a clear perception of new effects to be produced by a further natural develop- ment. They were dependent rather on the require- ments of emotional expression, to which the piano- forte must adapt itself if it could ; if not, so much the worse for the pianoforte. The new difficulties consisted partly in obscure and involved rhythms, partly in the peculiar rela- tions of the melodies to their accompaniments, partly in the use of extended chords in awkward THE TECHNIC OF THE ROMANTIC PERIOD. 199 positions, and partly in the participation of both hands in the delivery of the same phrase. In all these cases the thought is first in import- ance with the composer and facility of execution seems to be an entirely subordinate matter. Schumann's innovations, therefore, had, for a long time, comparatively little influence on the technical treatment of the pianoforte. But of late years, a generation of players and composers has sprung up who have been powerfully affected by the Schu- mann cultus, and have thoroughly accustomed themselves to his technic. It now begins to be said that some of his powerful effects imply and demand many of the most important technical qual- ities, both in player and instrument, which have heretofore been credited to Liszt, and which Liszt was certainly the first to popularize, both among players and pianoforte makers. The new school of writers represented by Brahms, Tschaikowsky, Moszkowski, the two Scharwenkas, the Brassin brothers and Sgambati, is deeply marked by the Schumann peculiarities. Chopin excepted, no composer has wrought such remarkable changes in technic during his life time as Franz Liszt. He was born October 22, 181 1, at Raiding, near Pesth, in Hungary. His father gave him his first lessons in playing the pianoforte at the age of six years. The boy at once showed the most remarkable gifts. His sight-reading, comprehension and exe- cution were astonishing. At nine years of age he Chap. XIII. Slow growth of Schu- mann s influence on technic. Liszt. His precocity 200 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIII. His sight reading. He settles in Paris. was able to play a difficult concerto in public, and roused the admiration of all who heard him by the fire and spirit of his performances. He attracted the attention of two Hungarian noblemen, who gave him a pension of six hundred gulden ( about three hundred dollars ) a year to ena- ble him to prosecute his studies. His father then took him to Vienna and placed him under Czerny's instruction. The boy also studied theory with old Salieri How well he read at sight will appear from a single anecdote. He went one day into a music store where some musicians were examining a new and difficult concerto of Hummel. Knowing that he played almost everything at sight, they gave him this as an extraordinary test. He played it at once with apparent ease. Of course, for such a pupil there could be few dif- ficulties, and before long young Liszt had com- pletely risen above all the demands of technic as then practised and had begun to invent new effects of his own. He also mastered the whole range of existing compositions for his instrument. In 1823 his father took him to Paris and the fol- lowing year to London, in both of which cities his playing excited surprise and admiration. In 1827 his father died, and young Liszt, now six- teen years of age, went to Paris to seek his fortune as pianist and teacher. He became at once a prom- inent adherent of the extreme Romantic school. Soon after he went to Paris, Hector Berlioz pub- THE TECHNIC OF THE ROMANTIC PERIOD. 201 licly produced some of his fantastic "programme music." Young Liszt was strongly attracted by its peculiar style and impressed by its unquestionable power, as well as by the evident mastery of all the resources of the orchestra displayed by this extremely eccentric and original composer. He soon set to work to transcribe these works for the pianoforte. The problem he set for himself was to reproduce, -with the limited resources of an instrument poor in melody and monotonous in tone-color, the effects of the full orchestra with all its different families of instruments. A stupendous task, indeed, and one impossible to discharge except in remote approxi- mation. But the degree of his success was aston- ishing, and his playing of his transcriptions was an exhibition of virtuosity which completely threw into the shade the performances of all other virtuosi in the capital. He followed up these works by numerous transcriptions of orchestral works, including some of the Beethoven symphonies, and afterwards tran- scribed numerous opera melodies, songs by Schu- bert and others, Hungarian Gypsy melodies (Rhap- sodies), and some of Bach's organ fugues. The impulse to this work was greatly quickened by the violin playing of Paganini, who appeared in Paris in 1 83 1. It was young Liszt's ambition to become the Paganini of the pianoforte. With this end in view he studied and experimented constantly to produce new effects in melody, harmony and brilliant passages, to increase the power and sonority -of his touch, to vary the quality or "color" of his Chap. XIII. His trans- criptions. Liszt' 's Technic, HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIII. The means he used. tones by different kinds of touches, to discriminate the different elements of a piece as widely as possible, and to make his playing effective by vio- lence of contrast, force, fire, spirit, delicacy and refinement,all carried to the highest attainable pitch of excellence. In all this he was successful, and attained such mastery as was not only the despair of all the players of that time, but remains, by general con- sent, unrivaled by any of the great pianists who have since been formed on the principles of his own technic. These principles were, first, the development of the greatest possible strength and power of discrim- inative emphasis in the individual fingers, and sec- ond, a much greater use of the hand playing with a loose wrist than had hitherto been customary. For the first, he held the wrist higher than other players, and left it perfectly flexible, but still in such a position that the fingers had all possible mechani- cal advantage for the production of a powerful tone. He also invented simple and radical exercises for developing the strength of the fingers in the shortest possible time. For the second, he made great use of single and double trills, runs, arpeggios, inter- locking passages, etc., to be executed with the two- hands alternately. This produced a totally new class of effects by means of wrist action. These brilliant pyrotechnics, though really not. much more difficult of attainment than the effects of the older technic, were thought at the time to be impossible for any one except Liszt himself, and. THE TECHNIC OF THE ROMANTIC PERIOD. 203 pieces like his " Rigoletto " Fantasie, now effectively played by some boarding-school misses, were then thought too difficult for great virtuosi. Between the years 1836 and 1848 Liszt played a great deal in all the principal cities of Europe and even in Constantinople, and was honored as few artists have ever been, alike by kings, princes, nobil- ity and commoners. In 1848 he became conductor of the Grand Duke's Opera at Weimar and since that has seldom played in public. He gave up his conductorship in 1859, and has since lived at Weimar, Pesth and Rome, always surrounded by friends and admirers, and by young pianists seeking his counsel. To these he has always shown himself a friend and benefactor. But Liszt's generosity has never been confined to artists. Wherever there was distress or need, there he was always ready with money, sympathy and powerful influence for help. No artist was ever more loved than he, and none ever seemed more influential in his own time. Liszt has devoted himself of late years to the composition of great choral and orchestral works. He had previously written many etudes, two con- certos and many other original works for the piano- forte. In these pieces, as in his transcriptions, the prime consideration is their relation to the public. His original ideas are seldom or never profoundly significant. Few of his original pianoforte works, at least, are conditioned on an inward necessity for Chap. XIII. Liszt's career as a concert player. His conductor* ship at Weimar. Liszt as a composer. 204 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIII. His works sensa- tional. Effect of his works. emotional expression so much as on the desire to affect others. And again, the desire is not to affect others by the communication of great thoughts and feelings which press for utterance and crave sym- pathy, but to make effect, to produce sensation, to dazzle, astonish, overwhelm by a display of force, brilliancy and mastery of effects unattainable by others. Liszt's works are always exciting, but few of them are poetic or inspiring. They are imposing in their sonority and in the bold and striking character of their effects, and imposing also in the sense that they appear at first to be much more significant than they really are. After we have a little recovered from the first shock of the powerful sensations they produce, we discover that these stormy passages are grandiose, not grand ; noisy, not sublime ; sensa- tional, not profound. The effect of them and of Liszt's playing and teaching has been to revolutionize technic and to bring about great changes in the construction of the pianoforte in the direction of an enormous increase of sonority and of capacity to endure a powerful touch without injury to the quality of the tone. But as regards creative and perhaps even inter- pretative Art, Liszt's influence has been much less marked and does not seem likely to be permanent. After all, the kingdom of true Art, like " the king- dom of God, cometh not with observation," and is THE TECHNIC OF THE ROMANTIC PERIOD. 2°5 manifested not in the fire nor in the whirlwind, but in the " still small voice." Liszt will certainly be known in the history of pianoforte music as the greatest virtuoso of his time. It seems not improbable that he will be credited with the development of the pianoforte and of its technical requirements to the extreme limits of the possibilities of both. At any rate, it is hard to see any capacities in the present instru- ments which Liszt has not exhausted, or what possible use of the muscles of the hand and arm in playing he has not discovered and practiced. He is the king of pianists and this title he seems likely to retain for all time. To sum up this discussion: Besides the increased demands on the interpretative powers of the player made by the great Romanticists, there are peculiar intellectual requirements. Among these are the peculiar involved, intricate rhythms of Schumann and the extremely original harmonies and modula- tions of Chopin and Liszt. But when these peculiarities have been perfectly grasped and assimilated in the mind of the player they are seen to involve mechanical difficulties of a character foreign to the classical technic. i. The great increase of sonority demands greater development of strength in the hand and fingers without in the least impairing the flexibility of the hand and wrist. Indeed the demand for perfect flexibility and independence of all the muscles, joints and nerves involved is even greater Chap. XIII. Liszt's place in history. Summary* Increased demands of modern technic. Strength. 2d6 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIII. Discrim- inative emphasis. New and peculiar fingerings. Lateral stretches of the fingers. Long skips. Wrist action. than ever, for the demand for discriminative empha- sis is greatly increased. Not only must the two hands be perfectly independent of each other, but each separate finger must be able to produce the most powerful tone of which it is capable, while other fingers in the same hand are producing tones of differing degrees of force. In short, there was never before such a demand for the blending of different degrees of force in touch, discriminating each with the greatest precision and nicety. 2. The peculiar harmonies and especially the em- ployment of harmonic bye-tones in scale and arpeggio passages demands a different mode of fingering from that which sufficed for the playing of classical pieces. This fingering involves putting the fourth and fifth fingers under the others with entire freedom, and, in general, a much freer use of the thumb' and little finger, especially on the black keys, than was formerly admitted. 3. The greater sonority attained by the use of chords in extended positions demands new stretches of the fingers laterally to make the new intervals effective. This involves both a greater development of the interosseous muscles of the hand, and a new lateral action of the hand from the wrist, some one of the middle fingers being used as an axis on which the hand turns loosely and rapidly to reach its new posi- tion. There has also been a great increase in the demand for long skips. 4. The demands for wrist action are also much greater than formerly, both as regards the alternate THE TECHNIC OF THE ROMANTIC PERIOD. 207 employment of the hands in trills and interlocking passages, and as regards full chords struck staccato, or in rapid succession. Two important works intended to develop the necessary technic to meet the demands of the Ro- mantic compositions are worthy of notice here : The Tausig " Daily Studies " and Mason's " Piano- forte Technics." Carl Tausig (1841-1871), was perhaps the most brilliant of all Liszt's pupils. A virtuoso of the very highest rank, for whom absolutely no technical diffi- culties existed, with a technic which seemed infalli- ble, his performances were dazzling in the extreme. Moreover he was a thoughtful, intelligent, well-edu- cated man and a practical teacher, so that he was every way admirably fitted to embody and commun- icate the results of his study and experience. He taught some years in Berlin, and gradually elaborated a system of elementary technical exer- cises calculated to develop strength, flexibility and in short all the requirements of the modern technic. He did not live to complete it however. It was finally edited and published by his friend, H. Ehrlich, another prominent teacher and pianist in Berlin, who incorporated many excellent ideas of his own in the work. These exercises, though seemingly elementary, must be used with great discretion, if at all, in the earlier stages of instruction. They are mainly use- ful to advanced players under the guidance of an intelligent teacher. Chap. XIII Technical studies. Carl Tausig, Tausigs "Daily Studies." 208 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIII. Mason's Pianoforte Technics. Wm. Mason. The Mason Technics, on the other hand, are simple and radical, and can be used with beginners. Indeed, there is no single exercise which will so rap- idly develop strength, flexibility of wrist and hand, delicacy, force and discrimination of touch, in short, all the technical merits of good playing, as the two- finger exercise elaborated by Mason in this work. He obtained the first hint of it from Liszt and after- wards developed and amplified it greatly. The treatment of rhythm in this work is also admirable and exhaustive. The book is one which no teacher can afford to overlook. Much of the clearness and force of statement which characterize the book, as well as some of the original work, are to be credited to the associate editor, W. S. B. Mathews (author of " How to Un- derstand Music "), who is wholly responsible for the letter press. Dr. Wm. Mason, author of the book, was born in 1829, and was a son of the well-known Dr. Lowell Mason. He went to Europe young, studied with Moscheles, Hauptmann and Dreyschock, and then went to Liszt about 1850, remaining with him some time. He became a very distinguished pianist with a world wide reputation. He has been settled as a teacher in New York since 1856, and has written many graceful, refined, excellent pieces for his instrument. paet fifth. Mln"ok Composees and Virtuosi of the dlffekent epochs. CHAPTER XIV. THE EPOCH OF POLYPHONIC MUSIC. The first harpsichord players were organists, and it was a very long time before there was any differ- entiation of harpsichord music from organ music. Whatever was written for one was played indiffer- ently on the othei The prevalent style was that of strict polyphony, though the dance forms gradually assumed a more lyric character and approached the monophonic style, developing the simple period forms. The harpsichord was the popular household instrument in Italy, Germany, England, and, indeed, wherever music was cultivated. In Italy, Venice was the city where instrumental music was more especially cultivated, and the suc- cessive organists of St. Mark's church distinguished themselves also as harpsichord players. The most celebrated of these was Adrian Willaert, a Netherlander, who founded the Venetian Music School in the first half of the sixteenth century. He wrote " Fantasies " and " Ricercari " in a free contrapuntal style, and was a great musician and composer. In his day, the so-called " Ecclesiastical Keys "* prevailed, and he was among the first to ♦See " History of Music," by Professor F. L. Ritter, Vol. I. Chap. XIV Harp- sichord music in Italy. Willaert. HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIV. Willaerts pupils. jftettt f mortal suggest the division of the octave into twelve semi- tones, an innovation out of which all our modern key relationship and modulation has grown. This change was greatly forwarded by the influence of two of Willaert's pupils, Nicolo Vincentino and Cipriano de Rore, and by still another pupil, Giu- seffo Zarlino, a renowned theorist. Other distinguished Venetian organists and harp- sichordists of the sixteenth century were Claudio Merulo di Correggio, Annibale Padovano, Andrea Gabrieli and Giovanni Gabrieli, most of them pupils of Willaert, and all partakers of his ideas. They wrote toccatas, full of lively passages and arpeggios, calculated especially with reference to the evanescent tones of the harpsichord as con- trasted with the continuous sound of the organ ; Canzoni, in a more lyric style ; and Sonatas, in free counterpoint. The change to the monophonic style was a very gradual one. One of the most important agencies in effecting it, as already pointed out in a former chapter, was the invention of opera at Florence in the last half of the sixteenth century. For the first time solo singers were provided with recitatives and arias, to which was added a simple accompaniment for the harpsichord. It soon became customary to write only a bass part for the harpsichordist or organist, the harmony being indicated by means of figures over the notes. But the player was commonly expected not simply to play the chords indicated by the figures, but to THE EPOCH OF POLYPHONIC MUSIC. 213 invent an accompaniment in imitative counter- point, and this remained the custom for more than a hundred years. The ability to do this was regarded as one of the greatest tests of musicianship. But there was more or less of free accompaniment in simple harmony, and the transfer of the recita- tives and airs to the instrument, with the accom- paniment, gradually familiarized players with the idea of a monophonic instrumental style. Still, the very ease and simplicity of it was in some sense a hindrance to its adoption. Musicians prided themselves on their ability to overcome the difficulties of elaborate counterpoint, and he who could most easily master its intricate mysteries was accounted of the highest rank in his profession. The highest tests of excellence were intellectual ones ; music had not yet come to be considered primarily in its relation to emotion. The ability required of players was the ability to play a complex web of voice-parts interwoven according to the rules of counterpoint, and, on occa- sion, to invent counterpoint to a given figured bass. Among the most renowned players and composers of this period ought to be mentioned Girolamo Frescobaldi (1588-1645 ?), said to have been an original genius, and to have written with especial reference to the capacities of the harpsichord as distinguished from the organ. He was organist at jSt. Peter's in Rome all the latter part of his life. His pupil, Johann Jacob Froberger (1 635-1 695), court organist to the Emperor Ferdinand, was the Chap. XIV. Improvisa- tion of counter- point. Musician- ship demanded of players. Frescobaldi u;88-ib45. 214 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIV. Pasquini 1637-1710. The English. composers. French composers. Rameau 1683-1764. most celebrated German player of the last half of the seventeenth century. Bernardo Pasquini (1637- 17 10), organist at St. Mary's in Rome, occupied a similar high rank. In England there was a school of distinguished players and contrapuntists. Thomas Tallis was organist to Queen Elizabeth in 1575, and so was his pupil, William Bird (1538-1623). Other distin- guished names are those of Dr. Bull (died 1622), Orlando Gibbons (1583-1625), and especially Henry Purcell (1658-1695). Specimens of their works are given in Weitzmann's " Geschichte " and in Burney's " History of Music." Some examples quoted by Burney from Dr. Bull are full of remarkable difficulties in the shape of passages in double thirds and sixths, some of which seem almost impossible of execution. In France the most distinguished players and composers of this period were Jean Henry D' An- glebert, court harpsichordist to Louis XIV, and Francois Couperin (1 668-1 733), a composer of much greater importance. His pieces were polyphonic, but the upper voice-part was often the predominant melody, and all the voices were ornamented with trills, mordents, appoggiaturas, etc. Contemporary with Sebastian Bach were Louis Marchand (1669-1732), a very distinguished player, and Jean Phillippe Rameau (1683-1764), whose work as a composer, though important, was much less significant than his labors as a theorist. He published a work on thoroughbass, i.e., the science THE EPOCH OF POLYPHONIC MUSIC. 2iS of chords and the art of harmonic accompaniment to a given voice, in which the old polyphonic stand- point was forsaken, that of monophony, the style in which one melody should be principal and the others subordinate was fairly occupied, and the ground was prepared for the development of lyric harpsi- chord music and of the sonata, which took place in the next generation. In Germany, besides Froberger, already men- tioned, the seventeenth century had many excellent organists and harpsichordists, among the most dis- tinguished of whom were Hans Leo Hasler(is64- 1612), born in Nuernberg, but court organist to the Emperor Rudolph II, in Vienna, a composer of very great merit ; Adam Gumpeltzhaimer, Mel- chior Franck, Samuel Scheidt, in the first half of the century; Johann Kaspar Kerl (died 1690), Johann Pachelbel (1653-1706), George Muffat, Andreas Werckmeister, Dietrich Buxtehude (died 1707), and Friedrich Wilhelm Zachau, Haendel's teacher, in the latter half. Froberger (1635-1695) deserves more extended mention, both on account of his prominence and because of his romantic adventures. He was the son of a cantor in Halle, and, showing great talent, was taken to Vienna by the Swedish ambassador, who had heard him play, and introduced to the Emperor Ferdinand III. The Emperor became his patron, and sent him to Rome to study with Frescobaldi. After three years, having finished his studies, he went to Paris and Chap. XIV. German composers 0/ tke Seven- teenth cen~ tury. Froberger^ 2l6 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIV. Becomes bellows blower in St. Paul's, London. Becomes known by accident. Dresden, and then, returning to Vienna, became court organist. In 1662 he received permission to visit London. He was robbed on his way through France, and, barely escaping with life, reached Calais in rags. He managed to take passage to London, but when near the English coast, the ship was taken by pirates, and he jumped overboard and swam ashore to avoid captivity or worse. Taking refuge in some fishermen's huts, they furnished him with one of their old suits, and in this guise he begged his way to London. There he entered St. Paul's, during service, to give thanks for his deliverance. At the close of the service he was accosted somewhat roughly by the organist, who learning that he was hungry and pen- niless, and knowing nothing of his character as a musician, offered him the job of blowing the bellows. This Froberger accepted in his need, said nothing of his profession, and continued in his hum- ble office until the marriage of Charles II with Catherine of Portugal. On this occasion he was so absent-minded as to let the wind out of the bellows, and the playing came to an abrupt and mortifying close in an important part of the solemnities. The organist flew at him furiously, bestowed on him some kicks and cuffs and rushed away. A lucky inspiration came to Froberger. He filled the bellows quickly, ran to the organist's bench and began to play in a style which was at once recog- nized by a court lady who had formerly been in Vienna. He was speedily sent for, told his strange THE EPOCH OF THE SONATA. 217 story, played before the King and his court, was received with great favor and richly rewarded. After a while he took his departure for Vienna, but his long absence had given offence and this had been aggravated by some slanders so that he was not even admitted to the presence of the Emperor. Mortified and indignant, he sent in his resignation and withdrew to Mayence, where he passed the remainder of his days in opulence, but in ill-humor with himself and with all the world. These names bring us to the period of Sebastian Bach, and with him to the climax of polyphonic composition for the harpsichord. But the seeds of the free lyric, monophonic style had long been sown, and, as we have seen, sprung up into luxuriant growth in the next generation. Even during Sebastian Bach's lifetime, signs of the approaching change were not wanting. Johann Kuhnau (1667-1722), Bach's immediate predecessor in the Cantorship of the St. Thomas School in Leipzig, did much toward laying the foundations on which Emanuel Bach built. He wrote sonatas in from three to eight movements, and strove toward a lyric style and in the direction of freeing the harp- sichord from the shackles of counterpoint. B. THE EPOCH OF THE SONATA. The Vienna of Mozart and Beethoven contained a group of distinguished players and composers ; the Abb6 Vogler, Sterkel, Wanhal, Gelinek, Pleyel, Chap. XIV. Returns to Vienna. Kuhnau. ibbf-iyzs. Viennese players. 2l8 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIV. Hummel, 1778-1S37. Czemy, 1791-1857. The Phil- istines. Cramer, 1771-1858. Berger, 1777-1839. Klengely 1783-1832. Wolfl, Steibelt and Dussek. Their works are now obsolete, only one or two pieces of Dussek being still current. J. N. Hummel (1778-1837), a pupil of Mozart, was, in his day, considered the rival of Beethoven. He was an accomplished musician, a player of the first rank, a prolific composer, and a successful teacher. His works are. now rapidly passing into oblivion. Carl Czerny (1791-1857) was another Viennese celebrity ; a player of high rank, a teacher of great reputation and a prolific composer of studies and pieces, mostly intended for teaching purposes. His studies, for the most part, amplified and em- phasized technical points to be met with in de- menti. The content of his pieces is never impor- tant. None of them go beyond the merely melodi- ous and pleasing. In this he is fully in accord with the Parisian pianists, his contemporaries, Kalkbren- ner, Herz, Bertiai, Huenten, et id omne genus, the " Philistines " against whom the Romanticists waged merciless war. Some of dementi's pupils deserved and received much greater consideration. J. B. Cramer (1771-1858) lived in England, was an excellent pianist and musician, and composed a great deal of music, none of which is now current except his famous studies. Ludwig Berger (1777-1839) was Mendelssohn's teacher, and also wrote some valuable studies. A. A. Klengel (1783-1852) was a renowned THE EPOCH OF THE SONATA. 219 pianist and organist and cultivated mainly the poly- phonic style of writing. His forty-eight canons and the same number of fugues are very learned produc- tions. Last, but not least, among dementi's pupils, comes John Field (1782-1837), who fairly ushered in the Romantic era by inventing the Nocturne, a lyric composition of a distinctly sentimental charac- ter, intended to express the various phases of feel- ing appropriate to the night time. They served as models for Chopin's compositions of the same name • and, although the Chopin nocturnes are vastly more significant than Field's, the resemblance was so apparent that Chopin was thought by many to have been a pupil of Field. These nocturnes were a really original invention. In these, for the first time, the lyric sentimental ele- ment was entirely freed from all considerations of classical Form. There was no preconceived, elab- orate plan ; the form is the simplest possible group- ing of single periods, is reduced to its lowest terms and to an entirely subordinate position ; the senti- ment is first and the form second. They are the fore-runners of the Songs without Words, the Bal- lades, Impromptus, Fantasias, in short, of the whole family of lyric pieces which began to come into vogue about the year 1830. Field was an Irishman, born in Dublin. After studying some time with Clementi, he went with him to Russia in 1804 and spent most of the remain- der of his life there. He wrote sonatas, concertos, Chap. XIV. Field, 1782-183?. HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIV. Moscheles, 1794-187 As a player. His compost- tions. and other pieces, and was one of the best pianists of his time. One of the most prominent figures of this time was Ignaz Moscheles *(i794-i87o). He was born in Prague of Hebrew parents, early made the ac- quaintance of nearly all the best music then pub- lished, distinguished himself as virtuoso, artist and composer, played and taught a long time in Lon- don, became very intimate with Mendelssohn, with whom he was associated in the Leipzig conservatory, and continued his connection with that school until his death. As a player, Moscheles was celebrated for his bold and brilliant style, for the power and variety of his touch, and for his octave playing. Curiously enough, he executed octave passages with a stiff wrist. As a composer he was very prolific, wrote seven great concertos, highly thought of and effective in their day, but now superseded ; several sonatas, three sets of highly esteemed studies and a large number of parlor pieces which retained their popu- larity for a long time. Moscheles outlived by many years the three great Romantic composers. He was well acquainted with their works, knew them all personally, and was inti- mately associated with two of them. Of course his own work as a composer could not *See u Recent Music and Musicians," by Moscheles (Henry Holt & Co., N. Y.), for an account of his own life and works. It is also a somewhat gossipy and very interesting record of his intercourse with the famous mu- sicians of the first half of this century. CONTEMPORARIES OF THE ROMANTICISTS. help being affected by the Romantic ideals, but he, nevertheless, remained an essentially classical com- poser and player in his tastes and tendencies. He was a teacher of great reputation, and formed many players, who attained distinction. C. THE CONTEMPORARIES OF THE ROMANTICISTS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS TO THE PRESENT. It will be remembered that all the Romanticists, including Liszt, were born in the years 1 809-1 1. About the same time were born a number of dis- tinguished musicians, of a lower rank than the first, but still of no small merit. Prominent among these is Adolph Henselt (born 1814), a distinguished virtuoso, a thorough musician and a composer of marked ability. Although his compositions, so far as known to the present writer, involve no technical principles not announced and exemplified by others, yet his Etudes, op. 2 and op. 5, for example, which are among the best known of his works, emphasized certain effects in a way that stamps his style with marked individuality. These effects are especially the delivery of a melody legato with an accompaniment of chords to be played by the same hand, the chords being often at such a distance from the notes of the melody as makes the proper execution of these passages very difficult. He also sets a similar task for both hands simultane- ously. In some of these etudes the left hand has a series of widely extended chords, the upper notes of Chap. XIV. Henselty 1814. HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIV. Hiller, rSir. Heller, 1815. Other good coin- posers. which constitute the principal melody, while the right hand has a figured accompaniment. His master- work is his great concerto in F minor, op. 16. Henselt has been settled in St. Petersburg since about 1837, occupied mainly in teaching. Another conspicuous figure in this generation of musicians was Ferdinand Hiller, born 181 1, at Frankfort-on-the-Main. Like Moscheles and Men- delssohn, he was of Jewish parentage. He was a pupil of Hummel, and occupies somewhat the same position with reference to the Romanticists that Hummel did to Beethoven, Schubert and Weber. He is a consummate musician, a respected com- poser, without much genius, a fine player of the classical school and an able conductor. He has been for many years director of the conservatory at Cologne. Stephen Heller (born 1815) is a sort of miniature Chopin. He has written nothing great, but much that is refined, elegant, and within certain limits ex- pressive. He is best known by his excellent studies in phrasing and interpretation, op. 16, 45, 46 and 47. He has been for many years a teacher in Paris. Other good composers or players or both of this generation were Th. Kullak. A. Dreyschock, Ernst Haberbier, Robert Volkman, W. Sterndale Bennett, Niels W. Gade, Louis Kcehler, Leopold de Meyer, Fritz Spindler, Henry Litwlff, Charles Halle, Wm. Taubert, Albert Loeschorn, Carl Eckert, H. Dorn and C. F. Weitzmann, the distinguished Berlin com- CONTEMPORARIES OF THE ROMANTICISTS. ^23 poser, teacher, theorist and critic of Berlin, author of the History of Pianoforte Music (Geschichte des Clavierspiels und der Clavierliteratur) heretofore cited. To a somewhat later generation belong Joachim Raff, Wm. Speidel, Ch. Lysberg, Th. Kirchner, Otto Dresel, Auguste Dupont, Otto Goldschmidt, Rich Hoffmann, Solomon Jadassohn, Louis Ehlert, Louis M. Gottschalk, H. A. Wollenhaupt, Waldemar Bar- giel, Dionys Prueckner, Hans von Buelow, the two brothers Anton and Nicolaus Rubinstein, Th. Leschetizky, Ernst Pauer and Carl Reinecke. Want of space forbids more than the mere men- tion of the names of most of these men. Brief notices of them may be found in Mathews' " Dic- tionary of Music and Musicians " (Part IX of " How to Understand Music"), and more extended ac- counts in Grove's Dictionary. But at least four of them are too important or too interesting to American readers to be passed over thus lightly. These are Raff, A. Rubinstein, von Buelow and Gottschalk. Joachim Raff was born at Lachen in Switzer- land, in 1822. His youth and early manhood were one long struggle with poverty, by which his educa- tion, both musical and collegiate, was greatly hindered. But he had great energy and persistence and a natural tendency to music. He supported himself by teaching and afterward by composing numerous parlor pieces for the piano. He grad- ually made himself a fine player and musician, and •c«ap. nv. Writer!. 1820. Raff^ iSst. 224 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIV. His rank as composer. Rubinstein, became a great master of orchestral composition. He was befriended by Liszt after the usual generous fashion of that master, and received from him encouragement and influential aid as well as valuable criticism. Raff ranks as one of the first of living composers, and has written a large number of important works, including ten great symphonies, operas, cantatas, chamber music, concertos for different instruments with orchestra, songs, pianoforte pieces, etc. The latter are less important than most of his other works, many of them having been written down to the popular demand out of the mere necessity of making a living. They are excellent parlor pieces, however, and some of his pianoforte pieces are wholly worthy of so melodious and learned a writer. Among them there is perhaps nothing better than his pianoforte concerto, which is as fresh as it is learned and skilfully written. Raff has been director of the Conservatory at Frankfort-on-the-Main since 1877. Anton Gregor Rubinstein was born in Russia, of Jewish parents, in 1829. He showed remarkable musical gifts in early childhood, studied the piano- forte in Moscow, and made his first concert tour at the age of ten years. During this tour he went to Paris, where he spent some time with Liszt. The- next year he went to London and also played on the continent. In 1845 he studied composition in Berlin, taught a couple of years in Pressburg and Vienna, and CONTEMPORARIES OF THE ROMANTICISTS. 225 then returned to St. Petersburg, where he devoted himself to study until 1856. From that time he has been considered one of the world's greatest artists. His countrymen have heaped honors upon him, and he has rendered great services in return. He founded the Conservatory at St. Petersburg in 1862, and was director of it for five years. Since then he has made many concert tours and has devoted much of his time to composition. His American tour in (1872-3), gave us oppor- tunity to admire his wonderful technic, the power and delicacy of his touch, the refinement, grace, fire, force and imagination of his playing. In most of these qualities he has never been surpassed, unless, perhaps, by Liszt. As an interpreter of the masters, Rubinstein is somewhat erratic, seeming to treat the piece in hand as if it was an improvisation and often paying small respect to the composer's intention. His interpre- tations also vary with his moods. He has been a prolific composer of piano music, songs, chamber music, etc., has written five sym- phonies and a number of operas and oratorios. Of all these his " Ocean " symphony holds thus far the highest acknowledged rank, and next to that his chamber music. His pianoforte music is almost all brilliant and effective and some of it is genuinely poetic. Its permanent worth is yet to be deter- mined. Hans Guido von Buelow was born in Dresden in 1830. His musical gifts did not appear until p Chap. XIV His A merican concert tour. His composi- tion. Von Buelow. 1S30. 226 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIV. Becomes a musician. Marriage and divorce. after a dangerous attack of brain fever, in his ninth year. He was then placed under the instruction of that most original and excellent teacher, Fr. Wieck. He afterwards studied the pianoforte with Litolff, and theory with M. K. Eberwein and Moritz Haupt- mann. His parents were unwilling that he should become a professional musician, and sent him to Leipzig in 1848 to study jurisprudence at the uni- versity. The next year he was at the Berlin Univer- sity, interested in politics, writing democratic articles, and musical papers defending the writings of Liszt and Wagner. In 1850 he finally broke with the law and went to Zuerich to have the advantage of Wagner's advice and counsel. The next year he went to Weimar to continue his pianoforte studies with Liszt, and two years later he made his first concert tour. From 1855 to 1864 he was the leading pianoforte teacher in Stern's. Conservatory at Berlin. In the latter year he went to Munich as conductor of the Royal Opera and director of the Conservatory of Music. His intimacy with Liszt and Wagner con- tinued, and he spent part of 1866-7 with Wagner at Lucerne. This friendship had a tragic ending. Von Buelow had married in 1857, Cosima, a natural daughter of Liszt by the Countess of Agoult, with whom Liszt had lived on the same terms that Chopin lived with Mme. George Sand. Mme. von Buelow seems to have inherited her parents' disregard of the obligations of the marriage tie. At any rate, after living with her SUCCESSORS OF THE ROMANTICISTS. 227 husband some twelve years and bearing him five children, it occurred to her that she preferred Richard Wagner to him, and she forthwith went to live with the elder musician, taking her children with her, and with him she continued until his death. Von Buelow procured a divorce, left Munich, and has since spent his time largely in concert tours in Europe and America. It has been repeatedly said that he was insane, an exaggeration probably occasioned by his numerous eccentricities and by the nervous excitement due to his domestic misfor- tunes and his overwork. He has always been an indefatigable worker in numerous fields. His compositions are not widely known and have made little impression on the world at large. But he is an excellent conductor, a pro- found and accurate scholar, one of the best of editors of ancient and modern classics, and a pianist of the highest rank. He has a remarkable memory, conducts a large repertoire of symphonies and operas, including the most intricate and difficult ones of Wagner, without a score; and plays nearly the whole range of piano- forte music from the most ancient times to the present from memory. No wonder if he were insane! As a player, his technic is beyond criticism and his interpretations characterized by a consummate intelligence which includes the minutest details in all their relations. The care with which all the ideas are discriminated, each receiving its due Chap. XIV. Peculiari- ties. A ttain- ments. As a player. 228 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIV. Gottschulky l82Q-l8bq, 'Com- positions* Playing, proportion of emphasis, is a revelation to most players. Withal, he is not a cold player, as some think, although he lacks the passionate abandon and head- long rush of Rubinstein. There is warmth and passion enough, but they are always controlled by intelligence. His concert tour in this country, made in 1874-5, two years after Rubinstein's, was very successful, and contributed much to the increase of musical appreciation and intelligence. Louis Moreau Gottschalk, the first American pianist, who became known all over the country by his concert tours, was born in New Orleans in 1829. He was of Creole blood. In 1841 he went to Paris, studied with Charles Hall£ and with Chopin, became a pianist of very high rank, made concert tours on the continent and returned to America in 1853. The rest of his life was spent in concert tours in North and South America. He died in Rio Janeiro in 1869. He had marked originality as player and com- poser, but his compositions are not likely to be per- manent. They are facile, fluent, and characteristic, but the feeling in them is shallow, often artificial and exaggerated, and may properly be characterized as sentimentality rather than sentiment. His programmes were largely made up of them to the exclusion of better things, but he was among the first to give the American public ideas of fine touch, delicacy, power and consummate ease and mastery in performance as well as of expression, within his SUCCESSORS OF THE ROMANTICISTS. 229 somewhat narrow range, and so he contributed much toward laying the foundations of musical appreciation and cultivation in this country. Of composers born since 1830, Johannes Brahms (born 1833) heads the list, followed by Camille St. Saens (1835), Adolf Jensen (1837-79), Josef Rhein- berger (1839), Peter Tschaikowsky (1840), Louis Brassin (1840) and his brother Leopold, Edward Grieg (1843), Phillip Scharwenka.(i847), his brother Xaver Scharwenka (1850), and Moritz Moszkowski (1853). It is still too early to determine the permanent rank of these men, even of Brahms, who is the best known and is one of the greatest of living musi- cians. He was ushered into the musical world by Schu- mann as a young man of the greatest promise. This promise he has at least fulfilled in large measure His two symphonies have great merits, both of com- position and invention, and so have his songs, chamber-music and pianoforte-music. His concertos are of the most difficult, combining all the technical difficulties yet invented, and show- ing deep marks of the influence of Schumann and hardly less of that of Liszt. St. Saens is an organist and pianist of great eminence in Paris. His orchestral pieces the " Danse Macabre " and " Phaeton " are well known in this country and are among the cleverest pieces of programme music ever written. The latter, especially, so vividly reproduces the impressions Chap. XIV Composers since 1830. Brahms^ 1833. St. Saens, IS35- 230 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIV. Jensen^ 1837-1879. Rhein- berger^ 1839. Brassin % Tschai- koivsky, 1840. Grieg y 1843. Schar- •wenkaS) 1S47. Mosz- howski 18S3- made on the feelings by the successive events of the well-known myth that the story can be followed in the music without the least difficulty. Jensen is best known in this country by his Etudes, op. 32. Rheinberger is a teacher and conductor in Munich, and has written important works in many departments. Louis Brassin and his brother Leopold are Belgians, and both are composers of marked ability. Tschaikowsky is teacher of composition in the Moscow Conservatory, and has shown great ability in different departments of composition. His pianoforte music includes a concerto, and is coming into constantly increasing prominence among pianists. Grieg is a Norwegian composer of marked origin- ality. His sonatas and other forms involving sus- tained thinking and thematic development are frag- mentary and weak, notwithstanding detached beauties. His strength lies in his short character- istic pieces for the pianoforte, marked by the pecu- liar coloring of the Scandinavian folk-music. The two Scharwenkas are prominent teachers and composers in Berlin. The pianoforte music of both is highly esteemed and its reputation is increasing. Moszkowski has perhaps greater genius than any of the younger generation. He lives in Berlin. His pianoforte pieces are rapidly making their way wherever music is known. To these names must be added that of Giovanni THE SUCCESSORS OF THE ROMANTICISTS. 231 Sgambati, an Italian pianist and composer whose work marks an era in the history of pianoforte music in Italy. He was born in Rome in 1843. His mother was an English woman, which may account, in part, for the peculiar turn of his genius. It may almost be said that there has been no great Italian pianist since the days of Scarlatti ; for Clementi, although an Italian by birth and blood, was an Englishman in his education. Up to a very recent period, Italian music, since the rise of Italian opera, has been almost exclusively in that field ; a field, too, long since thoroughly discredited in the rest of Europe by the increasing predominance of the intellectual over the sensuous element. The musical pre-eminence long enjoyed by the Netherlanders and afterward by the Italians was transferred to Germany not long after the death of Palestrina ; and there it has remained ever since. But of late years there has been a marvelous in- tellectual awakening in Italy. Verdi, pre-eminent in the purely pleasing and effective style of Italian opera, produced, at an age when most composers are past learning from their opponents, his " Aida " and his Manzoni Requiem, two great works which show him to have been powerfully affected by the theories and practice of Wagner. Sgambati, as pianist and composer, belongs as completely to the new school of romanticism as Brahms, the friend and disciple of Schumann. He is the one Italian pianist and composer who now enjoys a high reputation all over Europe. Before Chap. XIV. Sgambati, iigan 1843. Deadness of music in Italy. Its revival. Sgambati' 'i tendencies. 232 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIV. Comptr sition. Lady pianists. Mme. Essipoff, 1853- he was twenty he had become famous for his playing of Bach, Haendel, Beethoven, Chopin and Schu- mann. When Liszt went to Rome, about this time, Sgambati availed himself to the full of the great master's friendly advice and criticism, and became not only a great pianist, but an excellent musician, conductor and composer. He was the first to give orchestral performances in Rome of the works of the great German masters. He has written some important orchestral works and chamber music, as well as pianoforte pieces and a concerto. This last displays most of the technical difficulties peculiar to the Romantic writers, and shows very remarkably the influence of Schumann. It has high intellectual qualities and no small emo- tional significance. Besides these there are hundreds of meritorious composers whose names can not be mentioned here, for lack of space. Of the multitudes of living pianists of note only a few can be spoken of here. To give first place to the ladies : there are Marie Krebs, Madeline Schiller, Anna Mehlig and Sophie Menter, besides two in whom Americans are especially interested, Annette Essipoff and Mme. Julia Rive-King, the former from her American tour in 1875, and the latter be- cause she is an American by birth. Both are pianists and interpretative artists of very high rank. Mme. Essipoff is a Russian, born in 1853. She studied in St. Petersburg with Leschetizky, now her husband. Her playing is characterized by grace, LIVING PIANISTS. 233 delicacy, refinement and especially by the beautiful " coloring " she produces by her exquisite touch. She excels as an interpreter of Chopin. Mme. Rive-King was born in Cincinnati, in 1853. Her father was a portrait painter and her mother an able teacher of the voice and the pianoforte. She showed talent very early, went to New York and studied with the well-known teacher and composer S. B. Mills, and then spent some time with Liszt in Weimar. Since her return in 1875 she has played numerous programmes of the highest order, all over the United States and Canada, from Boston to San Francisco, and has earned a reputation of which Americans are proud. Her repertory includes the best of all schools, from Bach to Liszt and the younger com- posers since, and she is an admirable interpreter of the greatest works for the pianoforte. She has also composed graceful and pleasing pieces. In 1877 she was married to Frank H. King, her manager, and now lives in New York. Of male pianists known in this country must be mentioned Franz Rummel, Constantine Sternberg, Rafael Joseffy and Wm. H. Sherwood. The two former are both pianists of high reputation. Joseffy is one of the greatest of living virtuosi. He is a Hungarian, born in 1852, and was a pupil of Moscheles and Tausig. His technic is unsur- passed. As an interpreter he excels in such works as require exquisite delicacy, refinement and finish, being much less successful in those which demand Chap. XIV. Mme. Rivd-King, 1853. Male pianists. Joseffy, I&SS. 234 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chap. XIV. Sherwood^ ISS4- breadth, power, depth and nobility of style, He has been in this country since 1879, and has become well known. Wm. H. Sherwood was born in Lyons, N. Y., in 1854, and was the son of a music teacher. His tal- ent developed early, and he went to Berlin in 187 1 to study with Kullak, and afterward spent some time with Liszt. After four years spent in Europe he returned to America and has since played in many of the cities of the United States, everywhere winning the repu- tation of a pianist and interpretative artist of the first rank. His technic is equal to all possible demands, and he interprets the greatest as well as the most delicate and refined compositions of all schools with the true insight of a born artist. His rendering of the Schumann " Etudes Symphoniques," the great Sonata, op. 111, and the E flat concerto of Beetho- ven, and the Bach Chromatic Fantasia and Fugue, are among the most satisfactory performances it has ever been the good fortune of the present writer to hear. Mr. Sherwood has also composed several pieces of much promise. CONCLUSION. Our survey is now complete. We have passed in review all the important composers of pianoforte music, have analyzed their work, classified them .according to the principles which governed their creative activity, and traced the development of those principles to their results in the different epochs. The technical side of pianoforte playing has been similarly treated, and composers below the first or epoch-making rank have received as much attention as the limits of the book would permit. In the light of this discussion we may perceive that the time in which we live belongs to the Ro- mantic epoch. The three great romanticists died early, but their great colleague, Liszt, still lives, and it is but a few days since Richard Wagner, a greater mind than any since Beethoven, and an extreme Romanticist, was laid in his grave at Bayreuth. Wagner, to be sure, was not a pianoforte composer, but it can hardly be doubted that his indirect influ- ence has had no small effect on all departments of musical activity and especially production. That influence is apparently on the increase, and so is that of Schumann, the most intensely romantic of pianoforte composers. The public is beginning to understand both Schumann and Wagner, and the 23s Conclu- sion. The present time belongs to the Romantic epoch. 236 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Conclu- sion. Romantic ideal now pre- dominant. tide of interest in the Romantic composers seems to be rising. Moreover, all the rising young composers show strongly the influence of Schumann, and all are per- meated with Romantic ideas. The aim of all com- posers of standing, nowadays, is to give worthy expression to some phase of emotional experience. Originality is shown, as in the case of Grieg, Svend- sen and others, in seeking some peculiar manifesta- tion of feeling, perhaps some national or provincial type, and giving it adequate musical embodiment. The intelligence of composers is directed, not, as in the classical epoch, to the invention of new and more elaborate forms, or to the development of existing forms to their logical limits, but to the more complete and subtle comprehension of the relation of music to feeling. Their productive work is the embodiment of the results of this increase of intelli- gence. There are, indeed, composers who lay great stress on the intellectual side of music as represented in Form ; who write sonatas, symphonies, fugues ; there are even attempts to revive the suite and the ancient dance forms. There are those, too, who emphasize the sensuous at the expense of the intel- tectual and emotional elements of music. But, on the whole, the Romantic ideal is dominant and its influence seems to be on the increase. But are there tendencies discernible which are likely to produce a new revolution in pianoforte music ? Is there some new ideal, conceived or con- CONCLUSION. m ceivable, which may supplant that of the Romantic epoch as that supplanted those which preceded it ? So far as now appears, the last question must be answered in the negative. There are only three possible kinds of ideals in music : (i) those which relate to sensuous gratification, (2) those which give intellectual satisfaction, and (3) those which relate to the expression of feeling. We have already seen that the third is now dominant, and is in process of fulfillment. The second once held exclusive sway, but is now merged and absorbed in the third. The romanticists were not less but more intellectual than the classicists, but their intelligence was held subor- dinate to the new ideal, which they regarded as supreme. So the ideal of the Pleasing in Sensation, once supreme, has become subordinate to the intel- lectual and emotional elements. But at the same time, the means of sensuous gratification have been immensely enlarged, in connection with the demands of Form and expression. The resources of the modern orchestra, as developed by Wagner, Berlioz and others are vastly greater than ever existed before, and the harmonic and , rhythmic additions to the resources of pianoforte composers made by Schumann and Chopin were very great. The only progress which now seems possible is in the more perfect and complete realization of the three great ideals which have already been conceived and in great measure realized. As regards piano- forte music, the direction which improvement must take seems clear enough. The limitations of the Conclu- sion. Only threl kinds of musical ideals pos- sible. How progress is now possible. 2 3 8 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Conclu- sion. How a new instrument may supplant the pianoforte. instrument are patent to everybody, — as patent as were the limitations of the harpsichord two centuries ago. The pianoforte produces neither a sustained tone nor an increase of power in any tone after a string has been struck. These defects will doubt- less be remedied, and we may look forward to a keyed instrument which shall surpass and supplant the pianoforte, as the pianoforte surpassed and sup- planted the harpsichord and the clavichord. How this will be done and how long it will take we can not say. There are those even now who are work- ing on the problem. It is not at all improbable that Helmholtz's well- known experiments on overtones by means of a series of tuning-forks reinforced by resonators and kept in vibration by means of electricity, may point the way to the final solution. Perhaps the coming instrument may employ tuning-forks instead of strings, and may even give the player command at will of all the varieties of tone-color producible by the orchestra. Who knows ? At any rate, it seems plain that in this direction we are to look for the next great revolution in pianoforte music. When the new instrument has been invented and perfected ; when players and composers have be- come thoroughly familiar with its peculiarities ; when some great creative genius of the first rank has devoted his powers to the production of music calculated for the new effects, then the music of Beethoven and Chopin and Schumann will be to the music of that day what Bach's music is to our CONCLUSION. 239 own time. We shall have learned editors " translat- ing " the sonata appassionato, and the etudes sym- phoniques " from the language of the pianoforte into that of its modern successor,'' as von Buelow has done with the Bach Chromatic Fantasia and other harpsichord music. But this is speculation, not history, and perhaps even wild speculation. What our successors will see it would be idle further to conjecture. Conclu- sion. Addendum. ADDENDUM. Since this book was first published, a considerable number of young pianists and composers have become more or less known. It is, of course, not possible to mention all the meritorious ones, even if they were all known to the writer; but some of them have come to occupy so commanding a position that a brief notice of them is essential to anything like completeness. Some of them, indeed, as well as older and better known ones, really required notice in the first edition, the omission being due to the writer's comparative unfamiliarity with their work. Prominent among these must be named Dr. Louis Maas, of Boston, a pianist and composer of rare excellence. As an interpreter of great works of all schools, ancient and modern, he is extremely satis- factory. His playing is characterized by intelligence of the highest order, by breadth and nobility of style, by a vivid but chastened imagination and by a completeness of repose which sometimes passes for coldness v/ith superficial or unsympathetic auditors. He controls passion and is never controlled by it, so that his performances have a remarkable evenness of quality. Of several severe programmes which the writer has heard him play no remembrance remains of a single detail which one could wish to have other- wise than exactly as it was. Dr. Maas was born in ADDENDUM. 241 Wiesbaden, Germany, in 1852, but spent his youth in London, whither his family removed. He was a pupil of the Leipzig Conservatory from 1867 to 1871 and a teacher in the same institution from 1875 to 1880. Since the latter date he has been established in Boston. He has written symphonies and cham- ber music, besides music for his instrument, and many of his works are highly spoken of. Most of them the writer has had no opportunity to hear. Other Boston pianists and composers who have acquired reputation national in its extent are Arthur Foote, Geo. W. Chadwick, B. J. Lang, Carlyle Petersilea, Edw. B. Perry, Ernst Perabo, Carl C. Baermann, Mrs. Anna Steiniger-Clark, and Carl Faelten. The two former are known outside of Boston mainly by their compositions. Both have written pianoforte works, chamber and orchestral music of no small degree of merit and have made the American composer respected in Europe. Mme. Teresa Carrefio is a concert-pianist of the most brilliant type. As an interpreter of most masters she is open to the charge of modifying the composer's intention to suit her own fancy, changing the embellishments, cadences and introductions of Chopin's pieces, for example, in a way not to be approved by a conscientious critic. But the tropical fervor of her imagination, the fire, force and electric brilliancy of her performances never fail to excite an audience to the highest pitch of enthusiasm. Her playing of Liszt and of other brilliant composers is especially successful and effective. 242 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. She was born in Venezuela in 1853, of a distin- guished Spanish family. She showed her gifts in early childhood, received her first lessons from her father, and later studied with Gottschalk in New York. Her home is now in the latter city, whence she makes concert tours in both North and South America. Mr. Albert R. Parsons, of New York, is an excel- lent pianist, but is known outside of that city mainly through his translation of Wagner's essay on Beet- hoven, his work as an editor of pianoforte music for teaching purposes and his reputation as a teacher. He belongs among the most thoughtful, able and intelligent of American musicians. Philadelphia is represented in the ranks of concert pianists first and foremost by Mr. Charles H. Jarvis, who first became known west of the Alleghanies by his admirable recital at the Indianapolis meeting of the Music Teachers' National Association in 1887. His programme, beginning with the Beethoven Sonata appassionata, included a wide range of style and proved him an excellent interpretative artist. He was born in Philadelphia in 1837 and, as pianist and teacher, has done much to raise the standard of musical intelligence in his native city. Mr. W. W. Gilchrist, also of Philadelphia, has written some of the best chamber music for piano and strings yet produced in this country, besides choral music. He was born in New Jersey, in 1846, and has been long settled in Philadelphia as organist and chorus director. Mr. Richard Zeckwer, Direc- ADDENDUM. 243 tor of the Philadelphia Musical Academy, Anthony Stankowitch and Mr. John F. Himmelsbach are also excellent pianists. Mr. Richard Burmeister and Mr. Alexander Lambert are concert pianists of marked ability. The former lives in Baltimore and the latter is director of a Conservatory of Music in New York City. Mr. Ad M. Foerster is a composer of meritorious piano- forte and chamber music. His home is in Pittsburg, Pa. Mr. Wilson G. Smith, of Cleveland, has written a considerable number of graceful pianoforte pieces. Chicago possesses a number of concert pianists of great merit. Mme. Fanny Bloomfield-Zeisler is an artist of rare intelligence, and her playing is always characterized by great fire, force and delicacy. She was a pupil of Leschetizky. Miss Neally Stevens studied several years under the best artists in Ger- many, including Liszt, von Biilow, Theo. Kullak, Moszkowski and Xaver Scharwenka, and her play- ing fully bears out the encomiums she received from them. Miss Amy Fay is most widely known by her very interesting book, "Music Study in Germany," in which she gives an account of her experience as a pupil of Liszt, Tausig, Kullak, Deppe and others. She gives "piano- conversations" in various parts of the country. Mme. Eugenie de Roode Rice may properly be mentioned among Chicago pianists, although she has now removed to New York. She is an excellent interpreter of widely varied styles. Mr. Emil Liebling and Mr. Fred Boscovitz are the 244 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. leading male pianists of Chicago. They, with Silas G. Pratt, have written a good deal of pianoforte music. Among the very best of the young generation of American composers for the piano must be mentioned E. A. McDowell, Arthur Bird, Edgar S. Kelley and Johann H. Beck. All of them have produced excel- lent works and give promise of still better. QUESTIONS. INTRODUCTION. When, where, and by whom was the pianoforte invented ? What instruments preceded it ? Tell how the tones were produced in each of the three instruments. Why were the strings of the older instruments thin and light ? When did the pianoforte finally supplant them and come into general use ? Chapter I. Define the terms " Melody," " Harmony," " Counterpoint," " Monophonic," " Polyphonic." Describe the difference between Monophonic and Polyphonic Music. What device secures Unity in composition ? What are the two principal kinds of strict imitation ? Describe a Canon. Give an outline of a fugue. Describe free imitation. Describe the " Suite." Chapter II. Name the three greatest composers of Polyphonic music. Give Dates. Give a brief account of the life and work of each, omitting unimportant details. (The author recommends that students try to remember, in the biographies, only such leading points as these : Parentage, 245 246 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. early situation and surroundings, the same in youth, most power- ful influences affecting character and development, leading per- sonal traits, work accomplished.) Chapter III. Give examples of monophonic tendencies during the poly- phonic period. Describe the Sonata, as a whole. What is meant by " Form " in music ? Define the terms " Period," " Section," " Phrase," " Motive," " Period Group." How are these elements combined so as to produce a whole characterized by Unity, Variety and Symmetry? Give plan of " Sonata Form." Chapter IV. What three composers developed the Sonata form to its logical limits? Give Dates. Give brief accounts of each. Give difference between the sonatas of D. Scarlatti and those of C. P. E. Bach. Recapitulate the essential characteristics of the modern Son- ata. How many of these were known before Emanuel Bach's time? What did he do that had not been done before ? What did Haydn and Mozart do that had not been done before ? Chapter V. What is meant by " Content " in music ? What can music express, and what can it not express ? What do words express, and what can they suggest ? What can music do in the way of suggesting ideas or express- ing them indirectly ? Illustrate. What is a musical idea ? What is musical thinking ? QUESTIONS. 247 How many kinds of Beauty are there in music ? How many kinds of activity are possible to the human mind ? Give examples of simple and complex feelings. Tell the difference between desires and affections. Describe the relation of music to feeling. What music ranks highest, and what lowest? Chapter VI. Give brief account of Beethoven's life and work. Give an approximate list of his compositions, the most im- portant. What gives him his prominent rank as a composer? Chapter VII. In what senses is the term " classic " used ? What is meant by the term " romantic " ? Give the characteristic difference between the two styles of music. Chapter VIII. Give brief accounts of the life and work of Weber and Schubert. In what sense is the work of each " romantic " ? What are the marks of romanticism in Schubert's work ? Chapter IX. Who were the three greatest romantic composers for the pianoforte ? Give brief biography of each, with year of birth and death. Compare their characters and works. Chapter X. Describe the technic of the first classical period, as regards touch, sonority of instruments, demands on fingers and execu- tion, embellishments, fingering, etc. State the distinction between a " virtuoso," and an interpre- tative artist. 243 HISTORY OF PIANOFORTE MUSIC. Chapter XI. What advances in Technic were made by E. Bach, Haydn and Mozart ? Give difference between Viennese and English pianofortes. Give account of dementi's life and work. Chapter XII. Give account of growth of technic from Mozart to the Ro- mantic writers. Who developed the use of the pedal ? Chapter XIIIT ■- Give account of the technic of the romantic composers. Of Liszt and his work. Give summary. Give work of Tausig and of Dr. Wm. Mason. INDEX. Affections, 66-7. Agoult, Countess of, 226. Aida, opera by Verdi, 231. Albrechtsberger, relations to Bee- thoven, 77-8. Anglebert, J. H. d', 214. Arpeggios peculiar to Chopin, their fingering, 198, 206. Artists, formerly dependent on the patronage of nobles, 49, 53; con- trasted with virtuosi, 185. Bach, J. S. his life, 14-17; as a composer and player, 17, 18; his works and style, 17-19, 29, 30, 39, 41-46, 97- Bach, C. P. E. his life, 38, 39; his music and playing, 39-41 ; what he did for the Sonata, 41-48. Ballads, Chopin's, 153-4. Bargiel, W., 223. Beauty in music, 62, 71; Chopin's love of, 156. Bebung, the, 189. Beethoven, his life 72-81, 85, 86, 92-94; compositions, 75, 89-92; content and character of his mu- sic, 80-82, 85-89, 93, 99-101. Bennett, W. S. 222. Berger, L. 218. Bertini, 218, Bird, Wm. 214. Brahms, Johannes 229; influence of Schumann on his technic, 199. Brassin, Louis 229. ' ' Leopold 230 ; technic shows influence of Schumann, 199. Buelow, Hans von, 223-227. Bull, Dr., 214. Burney's History of Music, 214. Buxtehude, 215; visited by Bach, 15- Canon, 9, 10. Canzoni, 212. Chopin, his history, 134-152; 154- 156; his playing, 137, 138, 147- 149; compositions, 139-141, 143, I53-I56- Classic, the, in music, 57, 58; 95- 98; classic qualities in Mendels- sohn, 132-3; persistence of classical technic, 196. Clavichord, the, 2-3; its technic, 184-5. Clementi, Muzio, 191-4. Clinging touch, 197. Complex feelings, 65. Composition an intellectual process, 61. Concertos, form of, 31; Bach's, 46; Mozart's, 188, 190; Mendels- sohn's, 129; Chopin's, 139-141, 153; Schumann's, 172-3; Bee- thoven's, 193; Raff's, 224; Brahm's, 229; Sgambati's, 232. Concert Stueck, Weber's, 112. Content of music, 59-71, 97, 98; Beethoven's, 80-82, 86, 87, 93, 99; Haydn's 82-85, 99! Haen- del's oratorios, 23, 24; of Bach's Passion music, 24; of Mozart's, 57, 82-85, 99; of Chopin's, 154- 156; of Mendelssohn's, 131-134; of Schumann's, 65-68, 175-8; of Schubert's, 115-118; of Weber's, 111-12, 122; of Liszt's, 201-3. Correggio, Claudio, Merulodi, 212. 249 250 INDEX. Counterpoint, 7-10; double, 11. Couperin, F., 214. Cramer, J. B., 218. Creation, oratorio by Haydn, 50-1. Cristofori, invented pianoforte, 1, 3- Czerny, C, 218. Daily Studies, Tausig's, 207. Danse Macabre, by St. Saens, 229. Danzi, conductor at Stuttgart, 106. Der Freischuetz, Opera by Weber, 109, no. Desires, 65. Divisions of the Sonata Form, 34, 35, 42, 43- Dorn, H , 222. Dresel, Otto, 223. Dreyschock, A., 222. Dudevant, Aurora (George Sand), 1 50-1. Dupont, A., 223. Dussek, J. L., 218. Ecclesiastical Keys, 211. Eckert, C, 222. Ehlert, L., 223. Ehrlich, H., 217. Elaboration in the Sonata-Form,35, Elijah, oratorio by Mendelssohn, 130- Eisner, Chopin's teacher, 136, 145. Emphasis, discriminative, impossi- ble on harpsichord, 184; better on clavichord, 184; developed to its extreme limit by Liszt, 201-2 ; Romantic school demands it es- pecially, 206. Erl-King, song by Schubert, 114, 117. Ernestine von Fricken, friend of Schumann, 169, 170. Essipoff, Annette, 232-3. Esterhazy, Prince, Haydn's patron, 49, 50; Mozart's, 49. Ethical element in Beethoven, 87- 8, 99; lacking in Chopin, 155-6. Eugene, Prince of Wuertemberg, patron of Weber, 105. Euryanthe, opera by Weber, 109, no. Exposition of a Fugue, 42 . Fantasias of early composers, 211; Mozart's in C minor, 118; Bach's Chromatic Fantasia, 19. Feelings, 63-7, 71. Field, John, 219. Fingering, 183-4; 196-8 (See Technic). Form, 31-6, 96; in Scarlatti's Son- atas, 30, 41-46; in J. S. Bach's, 30, 46; in C. P. E. Bach's, 30, 44- 7; in Haendel's Suites, 46; Haydn's Sonata-forms, 51-2, 82; Mozart's, 57, 58, 82, Bee- thoven's, 82, 86, 87. Franck, M., 215. Frederick the Great, 16, 38, 39. French Composers, 214. Frescobaldi, 218. Froberger, S., 13, 215-17. Fugue, 10, 11, 16, 39. Gabricli, Andrea, 212. , Giovanni, 212. Gade, N. W., 222. Gaensbacher, friend of Weber, 104-5. Gelinek, 217. Gibbons, Orlando, 214. Gladkowska, Constantia, relations to Chopin, 139, 149. Glissando, octaves, in Weber's Concertstueck, 194. Goldschmidt, O., 223. Gottschalk, L. M., 228-29. Gradus ad Parnassum, Clementi's, 192-4. Grieg, E., 230. Gumpeltzhaimer, A., 215 Haberbier, E. 222. INDEX. Haendel, G. F., life and works, 19-24; monophonic tendencies, 29, 30, 43, 44; form of the Suites, 46; his technic, 185. Halle, Chas , 222, 228, Harmony, 7. Harpsichord, the, 2-4; its technic, 181-4. Hasler, H. L., 215. Haydn, F. J., biography, 47-52; compared with Mozart, 57; con- nection with Beethoven, 76, 77; compositions, 50-52, 82-5; his technic, 188. Heller, Stephen, 222. Henselt, Adolph, 121-3. Henschkel, J. P., 103. Hiller, F., 222. Hoffmann, R., 223. Hummel, J. N., 218. Huenten, 218. Ideals in music, 62, 237. Ideas in music, 61. Images, how expressed, 54, 60. Imitation, strict, 9, 10; free, 11, 12. Intellect, denned, 63. Intellectual appreciation of music, 61, 67, 231. " Invitation to Dance," 112, 122. Italian music, 231. " opera, Haendel's, 21-3, Jadassohn, S., 223. Jensen, A., 229, 230. Joseffy, R., 233-4. Kalkbrenner, F., I44~5. 218. Kerl, J. IC, 215. King, F. H, 233. Kirchner, T., 223. Klengel, A. A., 218. Koehler, L., 222. Krebs, Marie, 232. Kreisleriana, 170. Kuhnau, J., 217. Kullak, T., 222. Lassus, Orlandus, 9. Leschetizky, T., 223. Liszt, sketch of, 199-205; works, 201-204; technic, 202, 204-5. Liszt, Cosima, 226-7. Litolff, H., 222. Loeschorn, A., 222. Ludwig, Duke of Stuttgart, 106. Lysberg, C, 223. Manzoni Requiem, by Verdi, 231. Marchand, L., 212. Martini, Padre, 54. Mason, Win., 208. Mathews, W. S. B., 71, 208. Mazurkas, Chopin's, 153-4. Mehlig, Anna, 232. Melody, defined, 7; form of, 31. Mendelssohn, life of, 125-130; works, 126-131, 134; his technic, 197. Menter, Sophie, 232. Mental Activity, 63. Monophonic Music, 78, 29, 31, 39- 40. Moods, simple emotions, 65. Morzin, Count, 48-9. Moscheles, J., 218-19. Moszkowski, 229, 230. Motives, 33. Mozart, life of, 52-57; as a com- poser, 57-8; compared with Bee- thoven, 74-5, 82; content of his music, .83-5; his technic, 198- 190. Muffat, G., 215. Music, suggests scenes, 60, 163, 165-6, 229; relation to emotion, 69. " Oberon," by Weber, 109-110. Operas, 21-3; 56, 92, 109, no, 212, 231. Oratorios, 16, 22, 23, 50, 130. Organ music for harpsichord, 181, 211; fugues of Bach, 16, 39. Ornaments, necessity of, 182. 25 2 INDEX. Pachelbel, J., 215. Padovano, A,, 212. Paganini, 201-2. TPalestrina, g. Papillons, Schumann, 163, 165-6. Partitas of Bach, 46. Passion Music, Bach's, 16, 17, 24 ; revival by Mendelssohn, 127. Pasquini, B. , 214. Pauer, E. 223. Pedal, use of, 194. Periods, defined, 32. Period groups, 33. "Perpetual Motion," Weber, 112. Pfeiffer, Beethoven's teacher, 73- "Phseton," by St. Saens, 229. Phrases, defined, 32. "Philistines," 1 70-1, 218. Pianoforte, construction, 3; tech- nic, 218; powers, 237-38. Pleyel, 217. Polonaises, Chopin's, 153-5. Polyphonic Music, 7-13. Preludes, Chopin's, 152. Programme Music, St. Saens, 229; Berlioz, 201. Prueckner, D., 223. Purcell, Henry, 212. Quartets, form of, 31. Quintets, form of, 31. Raff, Joachim, 223-4. Rameau, J. P., 214. Reinecke, C. , 223. Rhapsodies, Liszt's Hungarian, 201. Rheinberger, J , 229, 230. Rhythms, of Schumann, 198-9. Ricercari, 211. Ries, Franz, Beethoven's violin teacher, 78. Rigoletto, Liszt's, 202-3. Rive^King, Mme. Julia, 223. Ritter's History of Music, 211. Romantic, ideal defined, 96, 99- 101; characteristics of Chopin, !36-37. 139-41, 152-56; of Men- delssohn, 126-28, 131-4; of Schumann, 159, 162, 165-70, 175-8; of Schubert, 116-19, 122; of Mozart, 118; of Bach, 19; of Weber, 109-12, 122; of Liszt, 200-1; tendencies, 235-6. Rondo in E flat, op. 62, Weber, 112. Rore Cipriano di, 212. Rubinstein, N., 223. Rubinstein, Anton, 224-25. Rummel, Franz, 223. Sand, George, Mme., 150-1, Scarlatti, A., 24. Scarlatti, Domenico, 24, 25, 30,41- 44;. his technic, 187. Scharwenka, P., 229, 230. " X., 229, 230. Scheidt, S-, 215. Scherzos, Chopin's, 153-4. Schiller, Madeline, 232. Schubert, Franz, life, 1 1 2-14; works, 1 13-19. Schumann, life, 156-174; music, 163-6, 168-9, 172; compared with Mendelssohn and Chopin, 175-8; his technic, 198-9; increas- ing influence, 235. Seasons, the, Haydn's, 50. Sections, 32. Sensibility, defined, 63. Sgambati, 230-2, 199. Sherwood, W. H., 234. Simple Emotions, 64-5. Sonatas, Bach's, 30, 46; C. P. E. Bach's, 41-8; Scarlatti's, 30, 41- 4; Haydn's, 51-2, 82; Mozart's, 57-8, 82; Beethoven's, 82-8; Kuhnau's, 217; of the 16th cen- tury, 212. Sonata-Form, 31, 35. Speidel, Wm., 223. Spinet, 4. INDEX 2 53 Spindler, F., 222. Steibelt, D., 218, 89-90. Sternberg, C, 233. Sterkei, 217. Stretto, in a fugue, 11. " St. Paul," Mendelssohn's, 130. St. Saens, C, 229, 230. Stuttgart, in Weber's time, 106. Subjects, 35, 42-3. Suites, 12, 45-6. Symphony, form of, 31; Beetho- ven's "Eroica," 86, 92, Ninth, 86, 93; Schubert's, in C, 115; unfinished, in B, 115; Tragic, 114; Rubinstein's "Ocean," 225; Brahms', 229; Sgambati's, 231; Mendelssohn's 128-9 Symmetry, 32. Tallis, Thomas, 214. Taubert, W., 222. Tausig, Carl, 207. Technic, of the first classical peri- od, 18 1-7; J. S. Bach's, 184-5; Haendel's, 185; Scarlatti's, 187; of the second classical period, 188-192; Mozart's, 188-90; de- menti's, 191-4; of the transition period, 193; Beethoven, 193: Schubert and Weber, 194; of the Romanticists, 194-6, Mendels- sohn's, 197 ; Chopin's, 197 ; Schumann's, 198-9; Liszt's, 201- 2; minor, 205-8. Thalberg, S., 194- Toccatas, 212. Transitions, 35. Trio or Alternative (Form), 34. Tschaikowsky, P.. 229, 230. Two - finger . exercise, Mason's, 208. Unity, 32-4. Van den Eeden, 73. Variety, 32. Verdi, 231. Vincentino, Nicolo, 212. Virginals, 4. Virtuoso vs. Artist, 181. Vogler, Abbe, 104, 217. Volkmann, R., 222. Von Breuning family, 74. Wagner, 226, 227, 235. Waldstein, Count, 74. "Wanderer," by Schubert, 114. Wanhal, 217. Weber, Carl Maria; life, 102-9; "i s compositions, 107-12, 122. Weitzman, C. F., 222. Werkmeister.A., 215. Wieck, Fr., 162-4, 170-1, 226. Wieck, Clara, 162-3, 169-70, 173. Will, 63. Willaert, A., 211. Woelfl, 89-90, 218. Wollenhaupt, H. A., 223. Wrist Action, 206-7. Zachau, 215. Zambona, 72. Zarlino, C, 212. CELEBRATED PIANISTS OFTXE PAST and PRESENT. «H«MM ILLUSTRATED With One Hundred and Fifty Portraits of European and American Pianists of the Past and Present. WMMH HANDSOMELY AND DURABLY BOUND IN CLOTH, WITH GOLD STAMP. PRICE $2.00. This volume is prepared with the utmost care, and forms one of the most reliable worts on musical biography pub- lished. The American Edition contains' about fifty pages of new material relating to pianists in America. This por- tion of this work has been carefully done. The work is very attractive in style and suitable for a gift book. Containing 4x4 pages. Each of the one hundred and fifty pianists has u biographical sketch of from one to thirty-six pages. 16