The Contemporary Science Series The Evolution &f Sex . wmm 5foui %azk HaU ^allege of Agriculture At OJarnEll UninerattB 3tliaca. N. 5. library Cornell University Library QH 471.G29 1908 The evolution of sex ■ / The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://archive.org/details/cu31924003078890 THE CONTEMPORAR Y SCIENCE SERIES. Edited by HAVELOCK ELLIS. THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. THE Evolution of Sex. BY Professors PATRICK GEDDES AND J. ARTHUR THOMSON. WITH 92 ILLUSTRATIONS. REVISED EDITION. THE WALTER SCOTT PUBLISHING CO., LTD., PATERNOSTER SQUARE, LONDON, E.C. CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS, 153-157 FIETH AVENUE, NEW YORK. 190"?. PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. THE rapid exhaustion of the large first edition (1889) of this book, and of subsequent reprints also, seems to show the need of a general survey of the essential phenomena of reproduction and sex. That this is in our case associated with a particular theory of the nature of these, need not hinder the reader from discriminating between facts and interpreta- tions. Hence in this revised edition, though many alterations and additions have been made, the original character of the work has been retained, and that notwithstanding the difficulty that the authors have in the past ten years been diverging biologically — the one towards a " Neo-Lamarckian " position, the other towards a " Neo-Darwinian '' one. Yet they remain agreed on the main endeavour of the book, which is to set forth the fundamental unity underlying the Protean phenomena of sex and reproduction. The biological interpretation worked out in this volume ma| be summarised in three propositions : — ■I A.) In all living creatures there are two great lines of variation, primarily determined by the very nature of proto- plasmic change (metabolism); for the ratio of the constructive (anabolic) changes to the disruptive (katabolic) ones, that is of income to outlay, of gains to losses, is a variable one. In one VI PREFACE. sex, the female, the balance of debtor and creditor is the more favourable one; the anabolic processes tend to preponderate, and this profit may be at first devoted to growth, but later to- wards offspring, of which she hence can afford to bear the larger share. To put it more precisely, the life-ratio of anabolic to katabolic changes, j~ in the female is normally greater than the corresponding life-ratio, -r, in the male. This, for us, is the fundamental, the physiological, the constitutional difference between the sexes; and it becomes expressed from the very outset in the contrast between their essential reproductive elements, and may be traced on into the more superficial secondary sexual characters. (£.) There is much experimental evidence to show that the determining stimuli which cause the balance of life to swing to one side or other, which shunt the plastic organism to this side or to that, are to be found, at least very largely, in the external or environmental conditions — food, temperature, light, chemical media, and so on ; so that the determination of sex becomes to some extent practicable in an increasing number of forms. (C.) Yet, the sexual dimorphism, in the main and in detail, has an adaptive significance also, securing the advantages of cross-fertilisation and the like, and is therefore to some extent the result of the continual action of natural selection, though this may of course check variation in one form as well as favour it in another. So far our main theses. Yet these are obviously but the preliminaries to others. That such an interpretation of the phenomena, of sex and reproduction must have its bearing on the whole treatment of the problem of the origin of species is manifest, and it appears to us that these two main variational PREFACE. Vll lines, upon which we seek to explain the divergent evolution of the sexes, are to be detected also in the variety and the species, in the group and beyond, it may be in the very contrast of plant and animal. But each new mode of interpretation in- evitably invites us towards the re-examination of the whole evolutionary process in all its aspects, in all its products. And if, as none now deny, the study of the simpler manifesta- tions of life be a legitimate and even a necessary preliminary to the understanding of human life itself, we must seek fully to rise from our elementary interpretation of reproduction and sex to the study of their vast complexity upon the human plane — anthropological and social, psychological or ethical, educational or practical. We have attempted to indicate some of these considerations more fully in the concluding chapter, as also in some of our separate papers and encyclopaedia articles cited in the text, to which a single other reference may be added.* Thus our volume has been from its incep- tion a dozen years ago but the beginning of a larger scheme which its general vastness on one hand, and the pressure of individual duties and cares upon the other, have alike delayed. But though this can never adequately be carried out, we still hope we may be able to do something, together or separately. The past reception of the book in biological circles has been varied. It has been, severely let alone by some authors, even when discussing the subject, and generously borrowed from by others, with or without acknowledgment. It has sometimes completely failed to be understood; we think we may say chiefly by those too pure morphologists to whom our starting-point, the ordinary physiological conception of protoplasmic metabolism as laid down, by Claude Bernard * Cf. the authors "On the Moral Evolution of Sex," The Ever- green, Edinburgh, Summer, 1896. vui preface. and his successors, had not been previously familiar. Some- times too it has been thoughtfully and keenly criticised, and from this we trust we have not wholly failed to profit. But it has also provoked a certain amount of research, which is better than all compliments and criticisms. We venture to think that the general tendency of research has been sub- stantially to confirm, not weaken our general theory : yet our hope is that the growing strength of the still young school of experimental evolutionists may before many years yield results which will involve not merely a revision, but a recasting of our book. From a wide circle, beyond that of professed biologists, we have also received criticisms suggestive as well as encouraging, and we trust, therefore, that, with all its shortcomings, this revised edition will be found freed of at least some errors, and freshened by the incorporation of some new observations and thoughts. P. G. J. A. T. Edinburgh,"! {December, igoo. Aberdeen, J PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION (1889). IN course of the preparation of critical summaries, such as the articles " Reproduction " or " Sex," contributed by one of us to the " Encyclopaedia Britannica," or the account of recent progress annually prepared for the Zoological Record by the other, we have not only naturally accumulated considerable material towards a general theory of the subject, but have come to take up an altered and unconventional view upon the general questions of biology, particularly upon that of the factors of organic evolution. Hence this little book has the difficult task of inviting the criticism of the biological student, although primarily addressing itself to the general reader or beginner. The specialist therefore must not expect exhaustiveness, despite a good deal of small type and bibliography, over which other readers (for whose sakes technicalities have also been kept down as much as possible) may lightly skim. Our central thesis has been, in the first place, to present an outline of the main processes for the continuance of organic life with such unity as our present knowledge renders possible ; and in the second, to point the way towards the interpretation of these processes in those ultimate biological terms which physiologists are already reaching as regards the functions of individual life, — those of the constructive and destructive changes (anabolism and katabolism) of living matter or proto- plasm. * X PREFACE. But while Books I. and II. are thus the more important, and such chapters as "Hermaphroditism," " Parthenogenesis," "Alternation of Generations," have only a subordinate and comparatively technical interest, it will be seen that our theme raises nearly all the burning questions of biology. Hence, for instance, a running discussion and criticism of the speculative views of Professor Weismann, to which their very recent intro- duction to English readers* has awakened so wide an interest. At once of less technical difficulty, and in some respects even wider issues, is the discussion of Mr Darwin's theory of sexual selection, reopened by the other leading contribution to the year's biological literature which we owe to Mr Alfred Russel Wallace.! Besides entering this controversy at the outset of the volume, we have in the sequel attempted to show that the view taken of the processes concerned with the maintenance of the species leads necessarily to a profound alteration of our views regarding its origin, although the vast problems thus raised necessarily remain open for fuller separate treatment. It is right, however, to say that the restatement of the theory of organic evolution, for which we here seek to prepare (that not of indefi- nite but definite variation, with progress and survival essen- tially through the subordination of individual struggle and development to species-maintaining ends), leads us frankly to face the responsibility of thus popularising a field of natural knowledge from which there are so many superficial reasons to shrink, and which knowledge and ignorance so commonly conspire to veil. For if not only the utmost degeneracy be manifestly connected with the continuance of organic species, but also the highest progress and blossoming of life in all its forms, of man or beast or flower, it becomes the first practical ''"Heredity." Oxford, 1889. + " Darwinism." Lond. 1889. PREFACE. XI application of biological science not only to investigate and map out these two paths of organic progress, but to illuminate them. Hence we have attempted to indicate the application of the general organic survey, which has been our main theme, to such questions as those of human population and progress, although here, more even than elsewhere, our treatment can be at best only suggestive, not exhaustive. While limits of space have made it impossible to give the botanical side of our sub- ject its proportionate share of attention, our illustrations of the essential facts are sufficient to show the parallelism of the reproductive processes throughout nature. It remains to express our thanks to Professor F. Jeffrey Bell for some valuable suggestions while the work was passing through the press ; to Mr G. F. Scott-Elliot for assistance in summarising certain portions of the literature ; and to our engravers, Messrs Harry S. Percy, F. V. M'Combie, and G. A. Morison, especially to the first-named, who has executed the great majority of our illustrations with much care and skill. PATRICK GEDDES. J. ARTHUR THOMSON. CONTENTS. BOOK I.— MALE AND FEMALE. CHAPTER I. The Sexes and .Sexual Selection page 3-15 i 1. Primary and secondary sexual characters - 3 I 2. Illustrations from Darwin - 5 i 3, Darwin's explanation by sexual selection - - 8 i 4. Criticisms of Darwin's explanation - 10 (a.) Wallace - - - - -. 10 (b. ) Brooks - - - - - - 11 (c. ) St George Mivart - - - - 13 CHAPTER II. The Sexes, and Criticism of Sexual Selection - 16-33 § I. Sex-differences - - - - - - 16 § 2. Differences in general habit. Males more active, females more passive ----- 16 § 3. Differences in size. Males smaller, females larger. Pigmies and exceptions - - - - 19 § 4. Secondary differences in colour, skin, &c. Males relatively more katabolic, females relatively more anabolic ------ 22 § 5. Sexual selection : Its limits as an explanation - - 27 Postulate of extreme aesthetic sensi- tiveness - - . - 29 Darwin and Wallace combined and supplemented - - - 31 Sexual selection a minor accelerant, natural selection a check to ex- tremes of variation - - 31 CONTENTS. CHAPTER III. PAGE The Determination of Sex (Hypotheses and Obser- vations) 34-44 § I. The period at which sex is settled. Ploss, Sutton, Laulanie, &c. . - . - - 34 § 2. Over five hundred theories suggested — Theological. Metaphysical. Statistical and hypothetical. Experimental. (Chap. IV.) § 3. Theory of male and female ova is no solution - - 3° § 4. Theory of " polyspermy," or multiple fertilisation, dismissed ------ 3° § 5. The theory of age of elements allowed. Thury, Hensen, &c. ------ 3° §6. Theory of parental age of secondary moment. Hofacker and Sadler ■""""." 37 §7. Theories of "comparative vigour," &c, require analysis 38 § 8. Theory of Starkweather,— many factors combined under "superiority" ----- 39 § 9. Darwin's position ----- 40 § 10. Dusing's synthetic treatment, and theory of self-regula- tion of numbers ----- 40 |n. The sexes of twins - - - - - 4 1 CHAPTER IV. The Determination of Sex (Constructive Treatment) 45~59 § 1. Nutrition as a factor determining sex. Favourable nutrition tends to females - 45 (a.) Yung's tadpoles - 45 (b. ) Case of bees ... - 46 (c. ) Von Siebold's observations - 48 (d. ) Case of aphides - 49 (e. ) Butterflies and moths - 50 (f.) Crustaceans ----- 50 (g. ) Rotifers . - - - - - 51 (h.) Mammals - - - - - . 51 (z'.) Human species - 51 (j.) Plants ----- 52 §2. Temperature as a factor. Favourable conditions tend to females ...... 53 § 3. Summary of factors : — (a.) Nutrition, age, &c, of parents affecting — (b.) Condition of sex-cells, followed by — (c. ) Environment of embryo ... 54 §4. General conclusion: — Anabolic conditions favour pro- duction of females, katabolic conditions males - 55 § 5. Hence corroboration of conclusion of Chap. II. , that fe- males were preponderatingly anabolic, males katabolic 55 §6. Notes on Weismann's theory of heredity - - 55 CONTENTS. BOOK II.— ANALYSIS OF SEX- CELLS. CHAPTER v. Sexual Organs and Tissues § I. Essential sexual organs of animals § 2. Associated ducts § 3. Origin of yolk-glands, &c. § 4. Organs auxiliary to impregnation § 5- E ggl a y in g organs § 6. Brood-pouches - -ORGANS, TISSUES, PAGE 63-7O 63 66 67 (■7 68 69 IIekm § § § § § 1 A- 5- 6. 7- CHAPTER VI. APHRODITTSM ----.. 71-86 1. Definition of hermaphroditism ; its varied forms - 71 2. Embryonic hermaphroditism. Ploss, Laulanie, Sutton 71 3. Casual or abnormal hermaphroditism, from jelly-fish to mammal ...... y 2 Partial hermaphroditism, from butterflies to birds - 72 Normal adult hermaphroditism, from sponges to toads 75 Degrees of normal hermaphroditism - - - 7S Self- fertilisation and its preventives - - - 79 8. Complemental males — cirripedes and Myzostomata - 82 9. Conditions of hermaphroditism ; its association with passivity and parasitism - S3 o. Origin of hermaphroditism ; a primitive or a secondary condition -..-.. £4 CHAPTER VII. The Sex-Elements (General and Historical) - - S7-103 § 1. The ovum-theory ..... s§ g 2. The history of embryology, "evolution" and " epi- genesis " ...... SS (a.) Harvey's epigenesis and prevision of ovum- theory - SS (b. ) Malpighi and early observers - - S9 {c.) Preformation school; " evolution " accord- ing to Haller, Bonnet, and Buffon ; ovists and animalculists - - - 89 (J.) Wolffs demonstration of epigenesis - 91 {e. ) Wolff's successors - - - ' - 92 § 3. The cell-theory ..... g 2 § 4. The protoplasmic movement - 92 § 5- Protozoa contrasted with Metazoa : the making of the " body ''.----- 95 § 6. General origin of the sex-cells in sponges - - - 97 ,, ,, ,, ,, ccelenterates - 97 ,, ,, ,, ,, other Metazoa - 97 § 7. Early separation of the sex-cells in a minority of cases 98 XVI CONTENTS. PAGE § 8. "Body" versus reproductive cells, and the continuity of the latter ------ 99 (a.) Owen ----- 99 (b.) Haeckel and Rauber . . - ioo (c.) Brooks - - - - " I0 ° (rf.)Jager I0 ° («.) Gallon IO ° (/)Nussbaum ----- ioo \g.) Weismann ----- ioo §9. Weismann's theory of the continuity of the germ plasma 101 CHAPTER VIII. The "Egg-Cell or Ovum ----- 104-116 § 1. Structure of ovum — Cell-substance and protoplasm - - - 104 Nucleus and chromatin - 105 § 2. Growth of ovum — Transition from amoeboid to encysted phase - 106 § 3. The yolk- Its threefold mode of origin - - - 107 Its diffuse, polar, or central disposition - - 108 Resulting influence on segmentation - - 109 § 4. Composite ova - - - - - - no § 5- Egg-envelopes — (a. ) From ovum itself - - - - 1 10 (b. ) From surrounding cells - - - no (c. ) From special glands - - - no § 6. Birds' eggs- Concrete illustration of facts and problems - no § 7. Chemistry of the ovum- Its capital of anastates - - - - in § 8. Maturation of ovum — Occurrence, formation, history of polar globules ; parthenogenetic ova - - - - 112 § 9. Theories of polar globules — (a) Minot, Balfour, &c. - - - 113 (b.) Giard, Mark, Biitschli, &c. - - 114 (c.) Weismann, Hertwig, &c. - - - 114 CHAPTER IX. The Male-Cell or Spermatozoon . - - - 117-125 § 1. General contrast between sperm and ovum — An index to contrast between male and female - 117 § 2. History of Discovery- fa. ) Hamm and Leeuwenhoek - - - 117 [b. ) Animalculists - - - - 117 (c. ) Classed as Entozoa or parasites - - 117 (d.) Kblliker's demonstration of cellular origin - 118 CONTENTS. XVII i 3. Structure of spermatozoon — " Head," " tail," "middle portion," &c 118 1 4. Physiology of spermatozoon — Locomotor energy and persistent vitality 120 i 5. Origin of spermatozoa — Theory of spermatogenesis - 121 i 6. Further comparison of sperm and ovum — Processes comparable with formation of polar globules 123 i 7. Chemistry of the sperm - 123 CHAPTER X. heory of Sex : Its Nature and Origin - - 126-142 § I. Suggested theories of male and female — Rolph 126 Minot - 127 Brooks - - 127 §2. Nature of sex — seen in Sex-cells 127 The cell-cycle 127 Protoplasmic interpretation 131 §3. Problem of origin of sex - 135 § 4. Nature of sex as seen in its origin among plants 136 § 5- Nature of sex as seen in its origin among animals 137 § 6. General conclusions from foregoing chapters 1 39 BOOK III.— PROCESSES OF REPRODUCTION. CHAPTER XL sxdal Reproduction - 145-168 § 1. Different modes of reproduction 145 § 2. Facts involved in sexual reproduction 145 § 3. Fertilisation in plants — From Sprengel to Strasburger - 146 § 4. Fertilisation in higher animals — From Martin Barry and Biitschli to Van Bene- den and Boveri 150 § 5. Fertilisation in Protozoa 157 §6. Origin of fertilisation — (2.) Plasmodium - 159 (/>.) Multiple conjugation 159 (c.) Ordinary conjugation ■ - 160 (a?.) Union of incipiently dimorphic cells 161 \e.) Fertilisation by differentiated sex-cells 161 § 7. Hybridisation in animals and plants 162 § 8. Telegony - - , - 166 XV1U CONTENTS. CHAPTER XII, PA Theory of Fertilisation ..... 169-1 § 1. Old theories — (a) Ovists, {!>) animalculists, (c) the "aura seminalis" - - - - - 161 § 2. Modern morphological theories — Nuclei all-important. Hertwig, Strasburger, &c. 17 Cell-substance also important. Nussbaum, Boveri, &c. ----- 17 § 3. Modern physiological theories — Sachs, De Bary, Marshall Ward, &c. - - 17; Cienkowski and Rolph - - - - 1731 Weismann's view - - - - 173] Critique and statement of present theory - 173 § 4. Use of fertilisation to the species — Rejuvenescence — - 17 Van Beneden and Biitschli - - - 17? Galton and Hensen - - - - 171, Weismann's critique - - - 176 The observations of Maupas - - - 176 A source of variation. Brooks and Weismann - 179 CHAPTER XIII. Degenerate Sexual Reproduction or Parthenogenesis- 183-199 § 1. History of discovery ----- jg., § 2. Degrees of parthenogenesis — Artificial, pathological, occasional, partial, sea- sonal, juvenile, total - . . jgn § 3. Occurrence in animals — Rotifers, crustaceans, insects - - - !gg § 4. Occurrence in plants — Phanerogams and fungi - - . . j„ § 5. The offspring of parthenogenesis - - . jqj § 6. Effects on the species - : q 2 § 7. Peculiarities of parthenogenetic ova — Weismann's discovery - „, § 8. Theory of parthenogenesis — (a.) Balfour - - . . . (c) Rolph ■ - - ■ ■ \l\ (d.) Strasburger - :?jj (e. ) Weismann - j: J The theory proposed - ^5 § 9. Origin of parthenogenesis - 197 CONTENTS. XIX CHAPTER XIV. PAGE ^sexual Reproduction 200-212 1 § I. Artificial division - 200 I § 2. Regeneration - . . 201 §3. Degrees of asexual reproduction - 203 § 4. Asexual reproduction in plants and animals - • 203 CHAPTER XV. Alternation of Generations - - 213-229 § I. History of discovery - - 213 §2. Rhythm between sexual and asexual reproduction 214 § 3. Alternation between sexual and degenerate sexual repro- duction 216 § 4. Combination of both these alternations 219 § 5- Alternation of juvenile parthenogenetic reproduction with the adult sexual process 220 § 6. Alternation of parthenogenesis and ordinary sexual reproduction - 220 §7- Alternation of different sexual generations 221 §8. Occurrence of these alternations in animals 221 § 9. Beard's hypothesis of alternation of generations in vertebrates - - 223 §10. Occurrence of alternations in plants - 223 § 1 1. The problem of heredity in alternating generations 224 § 12. Hints as to the rationale of alternation 225 §13. Origin of alternation of generations 226 BOOK IV.— THEORY OF REPRODUCTION. CHAPTER XVI. Growth and Rlproduction 233-245 § I. Facts of growth 233 § 2. Spencer's theory of growth 234 § 3. Cell-division - 235 § 4. Protoplasmic restatement - - 237 § 5. Antithesis between growth and reproduction - 238 § 6. The contrast in the individual — • (a.) In distribution of organs 239 (£.) In the periods of life • 240 §7. The contrast between asexual and sexual reproduction- 241 CHAPTER XVII. Theory of Reproduction — continued - - 246-252 § 1. The essential fact in reproduction 246 § 2. The beginnings of reproduction - 246 § 3. Cell-division - - 247 CONTENTS. pa! § 4. Gradations from asexual severance to liberation of sex- cells - - - - - - - 24 § 5. The close connection between reproduction and death - 24, § 6. Reproduction as influenced by the environment - 24: § "]. General conclusion ----- 25' CHAPTER XVIII. Special Physiology of Sex and Reproduction - - 253-282, 1 § I. The continuity of the germ-plasm - - - 2531 § 2. Sexual maturation ----- 255 §3. Menstruation - - - -' - 250 § 4. Sexual union ------ 261. § 5. Parturition ------ 26C § 6. Early nutrition ------ 265' § 7. Lactation -...-. 266^ § 8. Other secretions ... 26; § 9. Incubation ------ 26 §10. Nemesis of reproduction ... 272 § 11. Organic immortality ----- 275 CHAPTER XIX. Psychological and Ethical Aspiccts - - - 283-298 §1. Common ground between animals and men - - 283 § 2. The love of mates - - - - - 283 § 3. Sexual attraction ----- 285 § 4. Intellectual and emotional differences between the sexes - - - - - . 286 § 5- Love for offspring ----- 291 § 6. Egoism and altruism ----- 295 CHAPTER XX. Laws of Multiplication - § 1. Rate of reproduction and rate of increase § 2. History of discussion - - - . §3. Spencer's analysis; individuation and genesis - § 4. Spencer's application to man - § 5. General statement of the population question - § 6. Sterility - CHAPTER XXI. The Reproductive Factor in Evolution - . 316-333 §1. General history of evolution - . . . - g § 2. The reproductive factor so far as hitherto recognised - 32? §3. Suggested lines of further construction - i 2 Q 299-315 299 300 300 3°4 305 314 BOOK I. THE SEXES and SEXUAL SELECTION. 1. THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. t CHAPTER I. The Sexes and Sexual Selection. TT^HAT all higher animals are represented by distinct male JJ_ and female forms, is one of the most patent facts of observation, striking enough in many a beast and bird to catch any eye, and familiarly expressed in not a few popular names which contrast the two sexes. In lower animals, the contrast, and indeed the separateness, qf the sexes often disappears; yet ven naturalists have sometimes mistaken for different species, Cvhat were afterwards recognised to be but the male and female of a single form. § i. Primary and Secondary Characters. — When we pass from this commonplace of observation and experience to inquire' more precisely into the differences between the sexes, we speedily recognise that these are of very different degrees. In some cases no marked differences whatever are recognisable ; thus a male star-fish or sea-urchin looks exactly like the female, and a care- ful examination of the essential reproductive organs is requisite to determine whether these respectively produce male elements or eggs. In other cases, for instance in most reptiles, no external differences are at all striking, but the aspect of the internal organs, both essential and auxiliary to reproduction, at once settles the question. In a great number of cases, again, the sexes resemble one another closely, but each has certain minor structural features at once decisive as to its respective maleness or femaleness. Thus in the males there are frequently prominent organs used in sexual union, while the peculiar functions of the females are indicated in the special egg-laying or young-feeding organs. All such characters, THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. directly associated with the essential functions of the sexe are included under the title oi primary sexual characters. Of less real importance, though often much more strikin are the numerous distinctions in size, colour, skin, skeleton, ar Male and Female Bird of Paradise (Parodist* minorX-Yxom Catalogue of Zoological Museum, Dresden. the like, which often signalise either sex. These are termed secondary sexual characters; for though they will be shown in THE SEXES AND SEXUAL SELECTION. 5 ae-ne cases at least to be truly part and parcel with the male or i eunale constitution, they are only of secondary importance in h-2 reproductive process. The beard of man and the mane fethe lion, the antlers of stags and the tusks of elephants, the c?irgeous plumage of the peacock or of the bird of paradise, f e familiar examples of secondary sexual characters in males, 'ior are the females lacking in special characteristics, which jirve as indices of their true nature. Large size is one of the Ibmmonest of these ; while in some few cases the excellencies n colour, and other adornments, are possessed by the females Father than by their mates. The whole subject of secondary sexual characters has found its most extensive treatment in Darwin's " Descent of Man," and to that work, therefore, the more so as its limits exceed those of the present volume, the reader must be assumed to make reference. All that can be here attempted is an illustra- tion, by representative cases, of the main differences between the sexes ; from which we shall pass to Darwin's interpretation, land, after a fresh survey, to a re-statement from another point of view. , § 2. Illustrations from Darwin. — Among invertebrates, prominent secondary sexual characters are rarely exhibited outside the great division of jointed-footed animals or arthro- pods. There, however, among crustaceans and spiders, but especially among insects, beautiful illustrations abound. Thus the great claws of crabs are frequently much larger in the males; and male spiders often differ from their fiercely coy mates, in smaller size, brighter colours, and sometimes in the Winged Male and Wingless Female of a Moth {Orgyia antique?). — From Leunis. power of producing rasping sounds. Among insects, the males are frequently distinguished by brighter colours attractively dis- played, by weapons utilised in disposing of their rivals, and by the exclusive possession of the power of noisy love-calling. Thus, as the Greek observed, the cicadas "live happy, having voiceless wives." Not a few male butterflies are pre-eminently 6 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. more brilliant than the females ; and many male beetles fig savagely for the possession of their mates. Passing to backboned animals, we find that among fisr the males are frequently distinguished by bright colours ai ornamental appendages, as well as by structural adaptations f combat. Thus the "gemmeous dragonet " (Callionymus lyra) flushed with gorgeous colour, in great contrast to the " sordid female, and is further adorned by a graceful elongation of tl dorsal fin. In many cases, as in the sea-scorpion (Coth scorpius), or in the stickleback (Gasterosteus), it is only at th< c reproductive period that the males are thus transformed* literally putting on a wedding-garment. Every one knows, on the other hand, the hooked lower jaw of the male salmon, which comes to be of use in the furious charges between rivals! and this is but one illustration of many structures utilised in the battle for mates. In regard to amphibians, it is enough to! recall the notched crests and lurid colouring of our male newtsJ and the indefatigable serenading powers of male frogs and toads, to which the females are but weakly responsive. Among reptiles, differences of this sort are comparatively rare, but male snakes have often more strongly-pronounced tints, and the scent-glands become more active during the breeding season.; In this, as in many other cases, love has its noisy prayer re- placed by the silent appeal of fragrant incense. Among lizards, the males are often more brightly decorated, the splendour of their colours being frequently exaggerated at pairing time. They may be further distinguished by crests and wattle-like pouches ; while horns, probably used in fighting, are borne by some male chameleons. It is among birds, however, that the organic apparatus of courtship is most elaborate. The males very generally excel in, brighter colours and ornaments. Beautiful plumes, elongated feathery tresses, brightly-coloured combs and wattles, top-knots and curious markings, occur with marvellous richness of variety. These are frequently displayed by their possessors before the eyes of their desired mates, with what seem to us like emotions of love and vanity. Or it may be to the subtler charms of music that the wooers mainly trust. During the breeding season, the males are jealously excited and pugnacious, while some have special weapons for dealing directly with their rivals. The differ- ences between the magnificent male birds of paradise and their soberly coloured mates, between the peacock with his hundred THE SEXES AND SEXUAL SELECTION. s and the plain peahen, between the musical powers of le and female songsters, are very familiar facts. Or again, combs and "gills" of cocks, the "-wattles" of turkey-cocks, i immense top-knot of the male umbrella-bird (Cephalopterus uitus), the throat-pouch of the bustard, — illustrate another Blackcock and Grey Hen (Male and Female). series of secondary sexual characters. The spurs of cocks and allied birds are the most familiar illustrations of weapons used by the males in fighting with rivals. As in other animals, it is important to notice that male birds often acquire their special secondary characters, such as colour, markings, and special forms of feathers, only as they approach sexual maturity, and sometimes retain them in all their glory only during the breeding season. Among mammals, which stand in so many ways in marked contrast to birds, the law of battle much more than the power of charming decides the problem of courtship. Thus most of the striking secondary characters of male mammals are weapons. Yet there are crests and tufts of hair, and other acknowledgments of the beauty test, while the incense of odoriferous glands is a very frequent means of sexual attrac- 8 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. tion. The colours too of the males are often more sha contrasted, and there are minor differences, in voice and like, which cannot be ignored. Of weapons, the larger ca teeth of many male animals, such as boars ; the special t of, for instance, the elephant and narwhal ; the antlers of si The development of antlers in the successive years of a stag's life, or in the general history of stags. — From Carus Sterne. all but exclusively restricted to the combative sex ; th horns of antelopes, goats, etc., — which are usually mucl stronger in the males, — are well-known illustrations. Th manes of male lions, bisons, and baboons ; the beards ( certain goats ; the crests along the backs of some antelopes)'; the dewlaps of bulls, — illustrate another set of secondary characters. The odoriferous glands of many mammals are mora developed in the males, and become specially functional during the breeding season. This is well illustrated in the case of goats, deer, shrew-mice, elephants. The differences in colour are slight compared with those seen between the sexes in birds, but in not a few orders the distinction is marked enough, males being, in the great majority of cases, the more strongly and brilliantly coloured. Among monkeys the difference in colour in the bare regions, and the subtler decorations in the arrange- ment of the hair on the face, are often very conspicuous. § 3. Danvin's Explanation — Sexual Selection. — Darwin started from the occurrence of such variations, in structure and habit, as might be useful either for attraction between the sexes or in the direct contests of rival males. The possessors of these variations succeeded better than their neighbours in the art of courtship ; the factors which constituted success were transmitted to the offspring ; and, gradually, the variations were THE SEXES AND SEXUAL SELECTION. 9 established and enhanced as secondary sexual characters of the species. The process by which the possessors of the fortunate excellencies of beauty and strength outbid or overcome their less endowed competitors, he termed "sexual selection." It is only fair, however, to state Mr Darwin's case by direct quotation. Sexual selection " depends on the advantage which certain individuals have over others of the same sex and species solely in respect of reproduction." ... In cases where " the males have acquired their present structure, not from being better fitted to survive in the struggle for existence, but from having gained an advantage over other males, and from having trans- mitted this advantage to their male offspring alone, sexual selection must have come into action." ... "A slight degree of variability, leading to some advantage, however slight, in reiterated deadly contests, would suffice for the work of sexual selection." ... So too, on the other hand, the females " have, by a long selection of the more attractive males, added to their beauty or other attractive qualities." ... "If any man can in a short time give elegant carriage and beauty to his bantams, according to his standard of beauty, I can see no reason to dpubt that female birds, by selecting during thousands of generations the most melodious or beautiful males, according to their standard of beauty, might produce a marked effect." ..." To sum up on the means through which, as far as we can judge, sexual selection has led to the development of secondary sexual characters. It has been shown that the largest number of vigorous offspring will be reared from the pairing of the strongest and best-armed males, victorious in contests over other males, with the most vigorous and best- nourished females, which are the first to breed in the spring. If such females select the more attractive, and at the same time vigorous males, they will rear a larger number of offspring than the retarded females, which must pair with the less vigorous and less attractive males. So it will be if the more vigorous males select the more attractive, and at the same time healthy and vigorous females; and this will especially hold good if the male defends the female, and aids in providing food for the young. The advantage thus gained by the more vigorous pairs in rearing a larger number of offspring, has apparently sufficed to render sexual selection efficient." Another sentence from Darwin's first statement of his position 10 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. must, however, be added. " I would not wish," he says in the "Origin of Species," "to attribute all such sexual differences to this agency; for we see peculiarities arising and becoming attached to the male sex in our domestic animals, which we cannot believe to be either useful to the males in battle or attractive to the females." § 4. Criticisms of Darwin's Explanation. — The above explanation may be summed up in a single sentence, — a con- genital variation, advantageous to its possessor (usually a male) in courtship and reproduction, becomes established and per- fected by the success it entails. Sexual selection is thus only a special case of the more general process of natural selection, with this difference, that the female for the most part takes the place of the general environment in the picking and choosing which is believed to work out the perfection of the species. The more serious objections which have been hitherto urged against this hypothesis, apart altogether from criticism of special cases, are the following : — (a) Alfred Russel Wallavce and others would explain the facts on the more general theovy of natural selection, allowing comparatively little import to tbie alleged sexual selection exercised by the female, (b) Some, who allow great importance to both natural and sexual selec- tion, are not satisfied with leaving variation a mere postulate. The position occupied by Brooks will be sketched below. (c) Different from either of the above is the position occupied by St George Mivart and others, who attach comparatively little importance to either natural or sexual selection, but seek in terms of definite variation, constitutional tendencies, laws of growth, — for the idea is very variously expressed, — to find the primary and fundamental interpretation of sexual dimorphism. (a) Wallace's Objection. — It is convenient to begin with Wallace's early criticism, which precedes that of Brooks in chronological order. This is the more helpful in clearing the ground, since the two theories of Wallace and Darwin are strikingly and, at first sight, irreconcilably opposed. Accord- ing to Darwin, the gayness of male birds is due to selection on the part of the females ; according to Wallace, the plainness of female birds is due to natural selection, which has eliminated those which persisted to the death in being gay. He points out that conspicuousness during incubation would be dangerous and fatal ; the more conspicuous have, he thinks, been picked off their nests by hawks, foxes, and the like, and hence only THE SEXES AND SEXUAL SELECTION. II the sober-coloured females now remain. Darwin starts from inconspicuous forms, and derives gorgeous males by sexual selection; Wallace starts from conspicuous forms, and derives the sober females by natural selection ; the former trusts to the preservation of beauty, the latter to its extinction. In 1773, the Hon. Daines Barrington, a naturalist still remembered as the correspondent of Gilbert White, suggested that singing- birds were small, and hen-birds mute for safety's sake. This suggestion Wallace has repeated and elaborated in reference especially to birds and insects. The female butterfly, exposed to danger during egg-laying, is frequently dull and inconspicuous compared with her mate. The original brightness has been forfeited by the sex as a ransom for life. Female birds in open nests are similarly, in many cases, coloured like their surround- ings ; while in those birds where the nests are domed or covered, the plumage is gay in both sexes. But in his book on " Darwinism " Wallace goes much further in his destructive criticism of Darwin's sexual selection. The phenomena of male ornament are discussed, and summed up as being " due to the general laws of growth and develop- ment," and such that it is " unnecessary to call to our aid so hypothetical a cause as the cumulative action of female prefer- ence." Or again, "if ornament is the natural product and direct outcome of superabundant health and vigour, then no other mode of selection is needed to account for the presence of such ornament." This mode of criticism, however, belongs to our third category. (fr) Brooks has called attention to the sexual differences in lizards, where the females do not incubate ; or in fishes, where the females are even less exposed to danger than the males ; or in domesticated birds, where, though all danger is removed, the males are still the more conspicuous and diversified sex. "The fact too that many structures, which are not at all con- spicuous, are confined, like gay plumage, to male birds, also indicates the existence of an explanation more fundamental than the one proposed by Wallace, and the latter explanation gives no reason why the females of allied species should often be exactly alike when the males are very different." To the explanation which Brooks proposes we must therefore pass. According to Darwin, Brooks says, the greater modification of the niales°is due to their struggling with rivals, and to their selection by the females, but " I do not believe that this goes 12 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. to the root of the matter." The study of domesticated pigeons, for instance, shows that " something within the animal deter- mines that the male should lead and the female follow in the evolution of new breeds." The same is true in other domesticated animals, where, from the nature of the circum- stances, it is inadmissible to explain this with Darwin, by supposing that the male is more exposed than the female to the action of selection, whether natural or sexual. Darwin concludes, indeed, that the male is more variable than the female, but he gives no satisfactory reason why female varia- tions should be less apt than male variations to become hereditary, or, in other words, why the right of entail is so much restricted to the male sex. Darwin merely attributes this to the greater eagerness of the males, which "in almost all animals have stronger passions than the females.'' The theory which Brooks maintains, is bound up with an hypothesis of heredity differing considerably from that held by Darwin. He supposes that the cells of the body give off gemmules, chiefly during change of function or of environment, and that " the male reproductive cell has gradually acquired, as its especial and distinctive function, a peculiar power to gather and store up these gemmules." The female reproductive cells keep up the general constancy of the species, the male cells transmit variations. " A division of physiological labour has arisen during the evolution of life, and the functions of the repro- ductive elements have become specialised in different direc- tions." " The male cell became adapted for storing up gemmules" (the results of variations in the body), "and at the* same time gradually lost its unnecessary and useless power to transmit hereditary characteristics." "We thus look to the cells of the male body for the origin of most of the variations through which the species has attained to its present organisa- tion." The males are the more variable, but more than that, their variations are much more likely to be transmitted. "We are thus able to understand the great difference in the males of allied species, the difference between the adult male and the female or young, and the great diversity and variability of secondary male characters; and we should expect to find, what actually is the case, that among the higher animals, when the sexes have long been separated, the males are more variable than the females." The contrast between Darwin and Brooks may now be summed up again in a sentence. Darwin says, THE SEXES AND SEXUAL SELECTION. 1 3 the males are more diversified and richer in secondary sexual characters, chiefly because of the sexual selection exercised alike in courtship and in battle. Brooks admits sexual selection, but believes that the males are naturally or con- stitutionally more variable than the females, and that it is the peculiar function of the male elements to transmit variations, as opposed to the constant tradition of structure kept up by the egg-cells or ova. In other words, the females may choose, yet the males lead ; nay more, they must lead, for male varia- tions have by hypothesis most likelihood of being transmitted. Full consideration of this hypothesis would involve much discussion of the problems of inheritance, but the general con- clusion of the naturally greater variability of the males, will be stated in a different light towards the close of the following chapter. It will there be shown that the " something within the animal," which determines the preponderance of male variability, may be stated in simpler terms than are involved in Brooks's theory. Moreover, the greater variability of the males, which seems quite plain when we contrast, for instance, ruffs and reeves, requires to be proved for each case. Karl Pearson has disproved it for man. Somewhat similar to Wallace's later position is that (c) occupied by St George Mivart, who also looks for some deep constitutional reason for sexual dimorphism. The entire theory of sexual selection appears to him an unverified hypo- thesis, only acquiring plausibility when supported by numerous subsidiary suppositions. He submits a number of detailed criticisms ; but his chief contention is, that the beauty of males, and other secondary sexual characters, are not the indirect results of a long process of external selection, but the direct expressions of the internal differences of a progressively varying internal constitution, i.e., of tendencies inherent in the individual. Mivart's position and the vague suggestions of Mantegazza and others are of importance as indications of progress towards a fundamental restatement. As we have seen, an obvious objection to the theory of sexual selection is that, while it may in part account for the persistence and progress of secondary characters after they attained a certain degree of development, it does not account for their preservation when weak or incon- spicuous. In short, the theory may account for the perfecting, but not for the origin of the characters. It may be enough to 14 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. account for the length and the trimmings of the living garment, but what we wish to know is the secret of the loom. Darwin's account of the evolution of the eyes on the feathers of the Argus pheasant is indeed ingenious and interesting; but, whatever its probability, it is more important to ask what the predominant brightness of males means as a general fact in physiology. It is of interest, then, to notice the hints thrown out by Mante- gazza, Wallace, and others, directly associating decorativeness with superfluous reproductive material, and the putting on of wedding-robes with the general excitement of the sexually mature organism. From this record of the discussion, it is time however to turn to a more constructive mode of treat- ment. In passing, however, it should be noted that the fact of preferential or selective mating can be proved not only by observation, as the Peckhams have done in the case of spiders, but more conclusively by statistical enquiry, by investigating "whether the type and variability of the mated and unmated members of one or other sex are the same " (see Karl Pearson's "Grammar of Science," 2nd ed., 1900, p. 425). Apart from the particular problem of secondary sexual characters, it is of the utmost importance whether the mating is selective or in- discriminate. For if natural selection is at work its effect will be checked by indiscriminate mating, and aided by preferential or, to use the wider term, selective mating. THE SEXES AND SEXUAL SELECTION. 1 5 SUMMARY, I, 2. The existence of male and female animals is a commonplace of observation. They differ in primary and in secondary sexual characters, of which illustrations are given, chiefly from Darwin. 3. Darwin's theory of sexual selection seeks to account for the preserva- tion and perfection of variations, advantageous _in courtship or in battles with rivals. 4. Wallace maintains that the females have been protectively retarded by natural selection, and at a later date suggests that the greater decora- tiveness, etc., of the males is an expression of superabundant vigour. Brooks believes that the males are naturally the more variable, and pre- dominate in power of transmitting variations. Mivart demands a deeper analysis than is afforded by either sexual or natural selection. This physio- logical rationale is hinted at. LITERATURE. BROOKS, W. K. — The Law of Heredity: A Study of the Cause of Varia- tion and the Origin of Living Organisms. Baltimore, 1883. Cunningham, J. T. — Sexual Dimorphism. London, 1900. Le Dantec, F. — La Sexualite. Paris, 1899, 98 pp. Darwin, C. — On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection; or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London, 1859. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London, 1871. Delage, Y. — La structure du protoplasma, et les theories de l'heredite et les grands problemes de la hiologie generate. Paris, 1895. Ellis, Havelock. — Man and Woman (Contemporary Science Series). Geddes, P., and Thomson, J. A.— L' evolution du sexe. Quelques probabilites biologiques. Revue de Morale Sociale, I. 1899, pp. 95-m. Mivart, St George. — Lessons from Nature. London, 1876. Cf. also The Genesis of Species. London, 1871. Morgan, C. Lloyd.— Animal Life and Intelligence. London, 1890-91. Pearson, K— Grammar of Science (revised edition). London, 1900. Wallace, A. R.— Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection. Darwinism': An Exposition of the Theory of Natural Selection, with Some of its Applications. London, 1889. CHAPTER II. The Sexes, and Criticism of Sexual Selection. § i. Sex-Differences.— -To gain a firmer and broader founda- tion on which to base a theory of the differences between the sexes, it is necessary to take another review of the facts of the case. Instead of considering the differences as they are ex- pressed in the successive classes of animals, it will be more convenient to arrange them for themselves, according as they affect habit, size, length of life, and the like. The review must again be merely representative, without any attempt at com- pleteness. Male and Female Coccus Insects, a, part of a cactus plant with the excrescences due to coccus insects ; i, male ; c t female. § 2. General Habit. — Let us begin with an extreme yet well- known case. The female cochineal insect, laden with carmine, which some have interpreted as a reserve-product, spends THE SEXES, AND CRITICISM OF SEXUAL SELECTION. 17 much of its life like a mere quiescent gall on the cactus plant. The male, on the other hand, in his adult state is agile, restless, and short-lived. Now this is no mere curiosity of the entomologist, but in reality a vivid emblem of what is an aver- age truth throughout the world of animals — the preponderating passivity of the females, the predominant activity of the males. These coccus insects are the martyrs of their respective sexes. Take another illustration, again somewhat extreme. There is a troublesome threadworm {Heterodera schachtii) infesting the turnip plant, which parallels in more ways than one the contrast of the coccus insects. The adult male is agile, and like many another threadworm ; the adult female, however, is quiescent, and bloated like a drawn-out lemon. It may be asked, how- ever, is not this merely the natural nemesis of parasitism? The life-history answers this objection. The two sexes are at first alike, — agile, and resembling most thread- worms ; they become parasitic, and lose both activity and nematode form ; but the interesting fact is further, that the male recovers himself, while the female remains a victim. In other insect and worm types the same story, in less accented characters, may be distinctly read. In many crusta- ceans, again, the females only are parasitic; and while this is in part explained by their habit of seeking shelter for egg-laying pur- poses, it also expresses the constitutional bias of the sex. The insect order of bee parasites (Strepsiptera) is remarkable for the completely passive and even larval character of the blind parasitic females, while the adult males are free, winged, and short-lived. Throughout the class of insects there are numerous illustrations of the excellence of the males over the females, alike in muscular power and sensory acuteness. The diverse series of efforts by which the males of so many different animals, from cicadas to birds, sustain the love-chorus, affords another set of illustrations of pre-eminent masculine activity. Without multiplying instances, a review of the animal 2 Female Chondracanthus i a parasitic Crustacean, with pigmy male (a) attached just above the origin of the long egg- sacs (/>) of the female. — -From Claus. THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. kingdom, or a perusal of Darwin's pages, will amply confirm the conclusion that on an average the females incline to passivity, the males to activity. In higher animals, it is true that the contrast shows rather in many little ways than in any one striking difference of habit, but even in the human species the contrast is recognised. Every one will admit that strenuous spasmodic bursts of activity characterise men, especially in youth, and among the less civilised races ; while patient con- tinuance, with less violent expenditure of energy, is as generally associated with the work of women. Both sexes of a Flea— the Jigger or Chigoe {Sarco^sylla penetrans)', the female much swollen with eggs. — From Leuckart. For completeness of argument, two other facts, which will afterwards claim full discussion, may here be simply mentioned. {a) At the very threshold of .sex-difference, we find that a little active cell or spore, unable to develop of itself, unites in fatigue with a larger more quiescent individual. Here, at the very first, is the contrast between male and female, (b) The same antithesis is seen, when we contrast, as we shall afterwards THE SEXES, AND CRITICISM OF SEXUAL SELECTION. 1 9 do in detail, the actively motile, minute, male element of most animals and many plants, with the larger passively quiescent female-cell or ovum. It is possible that the reader may urge as a difficulty against the above contrast the exceedingly familiar case of the male bees or " drones." It must be frankly allowed that exceptions do indeed occur, though usually in conditions which afford a key to the abnormality. Thus it will be allowed that the "drones" are in a peculiar position as male members of a very complex society, in which what is practically a third sex is represented by the great body of "workers." They are no more fair examples of the natural average of males, than the hard-driven wives of the lazy Kaffir are of the normal functions of women. Nor is the exception even here a real one, for the drone, although passive as compared with the unsexed workers, is active when compared with the extraordinarily passive queen. To the above contrast of general habit, two other items may be added, on which accurate observation is still unfortun- ately very restricted. In some cases the body temperature, which is an index to the pitch of the life, is distinctly lower in the females, as has been noted in cases so widely separate as the human species, insects, and plants. In many cases, further- more, the longevity of the females is much greater. Such a fact as that women pay lower insurance premiums than do men, is often popularly accounted for by their greater immunity from accident ; but the greater normal longevity on which the actuary calculates, has, as we begin to see, a far deeper and constitutional explanation. § 3. Size. — Among the higher animals, there are curious alternations in the preponderance of one sex over another in size. Thus among mammals and birds the males are in most cases the larger ; the same is true of lizards ; but in snakes the females preponderate. In fishes, the males are on an average smaller, sometimes very markedly so, even to the extent of not being half as large as their mates. Below the line, among backboneless animals, there is much greater constancy of predominance in favour of the females. Thus among insects, the more active males are generally smaller, and often very markedly ; of spiders the same is true, and the males being often very diminutive are forced to task their agility to the utmost in making advances to their unamiable mates. So again, crustacean males are often smaller than the females ; and THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. in many parasitic species, what have been well called "pigmy" males illustrate the contrast in an almost ludicrous degree. Two cases from aberrant worm types exhibit very vividly this same anti- thesis of size. Among the common rotifers, the males are almost always very different from the females, and much smaller. Sometimes they seem to have dwindled out of existence altogether, for only the females are known (Philodina, Rotifer, Callidina, Adineta). In Polyarthra platyptera the male is "hardly to be distinguished from a Vorticella which has become detached from its stalk." In Hydalina senta (see fig.) the male is about a third the size of the female, has no alimentary canal, and has only two or three days of adult life. In the great majority the males are " little more than perambulating bags of spermatozoa," though in a few cases, like RMnops vilrea, degeneration seems hardly to have begun (Rousselet, 1897). Even when present, they are not indispensable, for partheno- genesis is very general. Relative sizes of a male and female Rotifer (Hydat/na senta). — From Leunis. In a remarkable marine worm, Bonellia, the male remains like a remote ancestor of the female. It lives parasitically on or within the latter, and is microscopic in size, measuring in fact only about one hundredth part of the length of its host and mate. Somewhat similar to the case of Bonellia is that of a vivi- parous coccus insect (Lecanium hesperidum), where the males are very degenerate, small, blind, and wingless. In spite of this condition, perhaps indeed because of it, they are very THE SEXES, AXD CRITICISM OF SEXUAL SELECTION. 21 male, for even the larvae, while still within the mother, have been shown to contain fully-developed spermatozoa. In a little " bear animalcule " or Tardigrade, Macrobiotus macronyx, the males are about half the size of the females and decidedly more active. A particularly interesting case of sexual di- morphism in molluscs has been described by Professor E. G. Conklin ("Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia," 1898, pp. 435-444, 3 pis.). In Crepidula plana, which occurs in Figure of tie female Bonellia (from Atlas of Naples Aquarium), with its parasitic pigmy male enlarged. shells tenanted by hermit-crabs {Eupagurus bemhardus), the female is about fifteen times larger than the male, and the latter- retains throughout life the power of locomotion possessed by the females- in their young stages only. I he females occurring along with the little hermit-crab, Eupa- vurus longicarpus, are always dwarfed, having a body volume only one-thirteenth of the more typical form. The cells of the dwarfs are of the normal size, but there are fewer of them, and 22 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. the eggs are also much less numerous. But this dwarfing is a mere " modification," and not inherited; it probably depends upon pressure or upon differences of nutrition and oxygena- tion. That is to say, the dwarfs are not a race, but are continually recruited from the young of the giants. It is interesting, therefore, to note that environmental influences may modify the female till in size it resembles the normally dwarfish male; and that the small size of the male implies, as in the case of the dwarfs, not smaller cells, but a smaller number of cells. In both dwarfs and males, the process of cell-division has been inhibited. Dr T. W. Fulton, Naturalist to the Scottish Fishery Board, has made valuable statistical observations on the size and numerical proportions of male and female fishes, (i) The females are usually considerably more numerous than the males, and never less numerous except in the angler and the cat-fish. The proportion of females to males among flat- fishes ranges from about i : i in the flounder, to about 12:1 in the long rough dab. Among "round" fishes the same proportion varies from about 3 : 2 in the cod, to 9 : 2 in the common gurnard. (2) The female is longer and larger among all the flat-fishes, sometimes by as much as 30 per cent. In cod, haddock, angler, and cat-fish, the males are larger, while in the whiting the females are slightly larger, and in the common gurnard decidedly so. One must not indeed base an argument on extreme cases, but there is no doubt that up to the level of amphidians at least the females are generally the larger. Apparent exceptions occur, it is true, among the higher animals. In birds and mammals the males are usually rather larger than the females. This difference consists especially in larger bones and muscles. The apparent exception is in part the natural result of the increased stress of external activities which are thrown upon the shoulders of the males when their mates are incapacitated by incubation or pregnancy. Further- more, we must recognise the strengthening influence of the combats between males, and the effect produced on the accu- mulative constitution of the females by the increased maternal sacrifice characteristic of the highest animals. § 4. Other Characters. — While it is easy to point to the general physiological import of large size and the reverse, physiology is not yet far enough advanced to afford firm foot- THE SEXES, AND CRITICISM OF SEXUAL SELECTION. 23 hold in dealing with the details of secondary sexual characters. It is only possible to point out the path which will eventually lead us to their complete rationale. The point of view is simple enough. The agility of males is not merely an adapta- tion to enable that sex to exercise its functions with relation to the other, but is a natural characteristic of the constitutional activity of maleness; and the small size of many male fishes is not an advantage at all, but simply again the result of the contrast between the more vegetative growth of the female and the costly activity of the male. So, brilliancy of colour, exuberance of hair and feathers, activity of scent-glands, and even the development of weapons, cannot be satisfactorily explained by sexual selection alone, for this is merely a secondary factor. In origin and continued development they are outcrops of a male as opposed to a female constitution. To sum up the position in a paradox, all secondary sexual characters are at bottom primary, and are expressions of the same general habit of body (or to use the medical term, diathesis), as that which results in the production of male elements in the one case, or female elements in the other. This theory of the origin and primary meaning of those variations which culminate in marked sexual dimorphism is obviously similar to that adopted by Wallace in his book on " Darwinism." Three well-known facts must be recalled to the reader's mind at this point; and firstly, that in a great number of cases the secondary sexual characters make their appearance step by step with sexual maturity itself. When the animal — be it a bird or insect — becomes emphatically masculine, then it is that these minor outcrops are exhibited. Thus the male bird of paradise, eventually so resplendent, is usually in its youth comparatively dull and female-like in its colouring and plumage. Very often, too, whether in the wedding-robe of male fishes or in the scent-glands of mammals, the character rises and wanes in the same rhythm as that of the reproductive periods. It is impossible not to regard at least many of the secondary sexual characters as part and parcel of the sexual diathesis, — as expressions for the most part of exuberant maleness. Secondly, when the reproductive organs are removed by castration, the secondary sexual characters are often much modified. Thus, as Darwin notes, stags never renew their £4 THE EVOLUTION OF SE5t. antlers after castration, though normally, of course, they renew them each breeding season. The reindeer, where the horns occur on the females as well, is an interesting exception to the rule, for after castration the male still renews the growth. This however merely indicates that the originally sexual characters have become organised into the general life of the body. In sheep, antelopes, oxen, &c, castration modifies or reduces the horns ; and the same is true of odoriferous glands. The parasitic crustacean Sacadina has been shown by Delage to effect a partial castration of the crabs to which it fixes itself, and the same has been observed by Giard in other cases. In two such cases ah approximation to the female form of appendage has been observed. Rorig (1899) has shown that a diseased state of the ovaries in deer is correlated with a development of antlers, that atrophy of the testes is always followed by some peculiarity in the antler-growth, that castration of a young male always inhibits the development of antlers, and so on. Sellheim (1898, 1899) finds that in many animals of both sexes castration is followed by a prolongation of the period of bone- growth. In the case of young cocks the effects of castration are very variable, sometimes increasing, sometimes decreasing the secondary sex characters. One result is clear, however, that the whole body is affected; the larynx is intermediate in size between that -of cock and hen, the syrinx is weakly de- veloped and the capons seldom crow or do so abnormally, the brain and heart are light in weight, fat accumulates in the sub- cutaneous and subserous connective tissue, and the skeleton shows many abnormalities. The experiments of J. Th. Oudemans (1898) on castrating caterpillars — a difficult opera- tion — led him to the conclusion, in marked contrast to the above, that there was little result either on the external appear- ance or on the habits of the adults. Thirdly, it should also be noted that in aged females, which have ceased to be functional in reproduction, the minor pecu- liarities of their sex often disappear, and they become liker males, both in structure and habits, — witness the familiar case of "crowing hens." From the presupposition, then, of the intimate connection between the sexuality and the secondary characters (which is indeed everywhere allowed), it is possible to advance a step further. Thus in regard to colour, that the male is usually brighter than the female is an acknowledged fact. But pig- THE SEXES, AND CRITICISM OF SEXUAL SELECTION. 25 ments of many kinds are physiologically regarded as of the nature of waste products. Such for instance is the guanin, so abundant on the skin of fishes and some other animals. Abundance of such pigments, and richness of variety in related series, point to pre-eminent activity of chemical processes in the animals which possess them. Technically expressed, abundant pigments are expressions of intense metabolism. But pre- dominant activity has been already seen to be characteristic of the male sex; these bright colours, then, are often natural to maleness. In a literal sense animals put on beauty for ashes, and the males more so because they are males, and not primarily for any other reason whatever. We are well aware that, in spite of the researches of Krukenberg, Sorby, MacMunn,. Newbigin, and others, our knowledge of the physiology of pigments is still very scanty. Yet in many cases, alike among plants and animals, pigments are expressions of disruptive processes, and are of the nature of waste products; and this general fact is at present sufficient for our contention, that bright colouring or rich pigmenting is more characteristic of the male than of the female constitution. In the same way, the skin eruptions of male fishes at the spawning season seem more pathological than decorative, and may be directly connected with the sexual excitement. One instance of the way in which the reproductive maturity is known to effect a by no means obviously related result may be given. Every field naturalist knows that the male stickleback builds a nest among the weeds, and that he weaves the material together by mucous threads secreted from the kidneys. The little animal is also known to have strong passions; it is polygamous in relation to its mates, and most pugnacious in relation to its rivals. Professor Mobius has shown that the male reproductive organs (or testes) become very large at the breeding season, and that they press in an abnormal way upon the kidneys. This encroachment produces a pathological condition in the kidneys, and the result is the formation of a mucous secretion, somewhat similar to what occurs in renal disease in higher forms. To free itself from the irritant pressure of this secretion, the male rubs itself against externalpbjects, most conveniently upon its nest. Thus the curious \ aving instinct does not demand or find rationale in the cumui itive action of natural selection upon an inexplicable variation, but is traced back to a pathological and mechanical origin in the emphatic maleness of the organism. 26 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. The line of variation being thus given, it is of course conceiv- able that natural selection may have accelerated it. So too, though again the physiological details are scanty, the superabundant growth of hair and feathers may be interpreted, in some measure through getting rid of waste products, for we shall see later how local katabolism favours cell multiplication. Combs, wattles, and skin excrescences point to a predominance of circulation in the skin of the feverish males, whose tempera- tures are known in some cases to be decidedly higher than those of the females. Even skeletal weapons like antlers may be similarly interpreted; while the exaggerated activity of the scent-glands is another expedient for excreting waste. Male (c), Worker (6), and Queen (a) Ant.— From Chambers's Encyc, after Lubbock. In regard to horns, feathers, and the like, in association with vigorous circulation, two sentences from Rolph may be quoted: — " The exceedingly abundant circulation, which periodically occurs in the at first soft frontal protuberances of stags, admits and conditions the colossal development of horn and delicate ensheathing velvet. ... In the same way, the rich flow of blood in the feather papillae conditions the immense growth of the feathers, . . . and the same is true of hairs, spines, and teeth." Professor J. Kennel gives expression in an interesting essay to an entirely different interpretation of such structures as antlers. It may be that they, like the horns of Ruminants, were originally possessed by both sexes, and that they have been lost by the females whose reproductive sacrifice leaves, as it were, less to spare for such expensive structures as antlers are. .So it may be that the female deer have ceased to develop antlers except where the conditions of life rendered their retention indispensable, namely, in the reindeer. In other words, this may be one of the many cases in which the female is nearer not to the ancestral but to the youthful type. THE SEXES, AND CRITICISM OF SEXUAL SELECTION. 27 Some of the even subtler differences between the sexes are of interest in illustrating the general antithesis. Thus in the love-lights of the Italian glow insect (Luciola), the colour is said to be identical in the two sexes, and the intensity is much the same. That of the female, however, who is in other respects rather male-like in her amatory emotions, is more restricted. It is interesting further to notice that the rhythm of the light in the male is more rapid and the flashes are briefer, while that of the female is longer and the flashes more distant and tremu- lous. This illustration may thus serve as a literally illumined index of the contrasted physiology of the sexes. The case of the Psychidae- among Lepidoptera is particularly instructive. Both males and females are normal caterpillars, but while the males become winged, the female remains at the larval level, as regards absence of wings and the usual adult appendages, oral as well as locomotor, but differing from the larva in being reproductive. In short, the female degenerates to the juvenile level except in productivity, while the male without doubt is nearer the ancestral form. § 5. Sexual Selection: its Limit as an Explanation. — We are now in a better position to criticise Mr. Darwin's theory. On his view, males are stronger, handsomer, or more emo- tional, because ancestral forms happened to become so in a slight degree. In other words, the reward of breeding-success gradually perpetuated and perfected a casual advantage. According to the present view, males are stronger, handsomer, or more emotional, simply because they are males, — i.e., of more active physiological habit than their mates. In phrase- ology which will presently become more intelligible and concrete, the males tend to live at a loss, are relatively more katabolic. The females, on the other hand, tend to live at a profit, are relatively more anabolic, — constructive processes predominating in their life, whence indeed the capacity of bearing offspring. No one can dispute that the nutritive, vegetative, or self- regarding processes within the plant or animal are opposed to the reproductive, multiplying, or species-regarding processes, as income to expenditure, or as building up to breaking down. But within the ordinary nutritive or vegetative functions of the body, there is necessarily a continuous antithesis between two sets of processes, — constructive and destructive metabolism. The contrast between these two processes is seen throughout nature, whether in the alternating phases of cell life, or of 28 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. activity and repose, or in the great antithesis between growth and reproduction ; and it is this same contrast which we recognise as the fundamental difference between male and female. The proof of this will run through the work, but our fundamental thesis may at once be roughly enunciated in a diagrammatic expression (which in its present form we owe to our friend Dr W. E. Fothergill):— Here the sum-total of the functions are divided into nutritive and reproductive, the former into anabolic and katabolic processes, the latter into male and female activities, — so far with all physiologists, without exception or dispute.* Our special theory lies, however, in suggesting the parallelism of the two sets of processes. Thus maleness is associated with a life-ratio in which katabolism has a relatively greater SUM OF FUNCTIONS. Nutrition. Reproduction. Anabolism. Katabolism. Female. Male. predominance than in the female. In terms of this thesis, therefore, both primary and secondary sexual characters express the fundamental physiological bias characteristic of either sex. Sexual selection resembles artificial selection, but the female takes the place of the human breeder; it resembles natural selection, but the selective females and the combative * The reader whose physiological studies may not have familiarised him with that conception (really dating from Claude Bernard) of all physiological processes as finding their ultimate expression in the metabolism (anabolism and katabolism) of protoplasm, will easily place himself in a position to check our argument (often indeed, we trust to carry our interpretation of sex into still further detail) by starting from the exposition of this doctrine in Sir Michael Foster's article, " Physiology," in the Encyclopedia Britamiica, or with Sir Burdon Sanderson's Presidential Address to Section D, British Association, 1889. THE SEXES, AND CRITICISM OF SEXUAL SELECTION. 20 males represent a role filled in the larger case by the fostering or eliminating action of the environment. As a special case of natural selection, Darwin's theory is open to the objection of being teleological, i.e., of accounting for structures in terms of a final advantage. It is also open to the logical critic to urge that the structures to be explained have to be accounted for before, as well as after, the stage when they were developed enough to be useful. The origin, or in other words the funda- mental physiological import, of the structures must be ex- plained before we have a complete or adequate theory of organic evolution. Apart from this logical insufficiency, the theory of sexual selection is open to many minor objections, with some of which Darwin himself dealt. One detailed objection which seems serious may be noticed. The evolution of coloured markings by selective preference carries with it the postulate of a certain level of sesthetic taste and critical power in the female, and this not only very high and very scrupulous as to details, but remaining permanent as a standard of fashion from generation to generation, — large assumptions all, and scarcely verifiable in human experience. Yet we cannot suppose that Mr Darwin considered the human female as peculiarly un- developed. It is true, doubtless, that both insects and birds have so far and increasingly become educated in such sensi- tiveness; but when we consider the complexity of the mark- ings of the male bird or insect, and the slow gradations from one stage of perfection to another, it seems difficult to credit birds or butterflies with a degree of sesthetic development exhibited by no human being without both special aesthetic acuteness and special training. Moreover, the butterfly, which is supposed to possess this extraordinary development of psychological subtlety, will fly naively to a piece of white paper on the ground, and is attracted by the primary sesthetic stimulus of an old-fashioned wall-paper, not to speak of the gaudy and monotonous brightness of some of our garden flowers. Thus we have the further difficulty, that we must suppose the female butterfly to have a double standard of taste, one for the flowers which she and her mate both visit, the other for the far more complex colouring and markings of the males. And even among birds, if we take those unmis- takable hints of real awakening of the sesthetic sense which are exhibited by the Australian bowerbird or by the common 30 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. jackdaw in its fondness for bright objects, how very rude is this taste compared with the critical examination of in- finitesimal variations of plumage on which Darwin relies. Is not, therefore, his essential supposition too glaringly anthropo- morphic ? Again, the most beautiful males are often extremely com- bative; and on the conventional view this is a mere coin- cidence, yet a most unfortunate one for Mr Darwin's view. Battle thus constantly decides the question of pairing, and in cases where, by hypothesis, the female should have most choice, she has simply to yield to the victor. On our view, however, combative energy and sexual beauty rise pari passu with male katabolism. Or again, in the ALneas group of the genus Papilio, Darwin notes how there are frequent gradations in the amount of difference between the sexes. Sometimes the sexes are alike dull, where we should have to suppose the aesthetic perception must somehow have been lost or inhibited ; sometimes the females are dull and the males splendid, — for Darwin, an example of the result of sexual aesthetic perception, this of an exquisitely subtle kind however, and without proportionate cerebral enlargement In a third set of cases, both sexes are splendid, which would suggest logically that the male in turn had acquired a taste for splendour. But such cases, which usually need more or less cumbrous additional hypothesis of inheritance and so on to explain them, are intelligible enough if we regard them as a relative increase of katabolism in the life-ratio throughout a series of species. The third set may be supposed to be relatively more katabolic than the first, while the second set are midway; although, it may be freely granted, a knowledge of the habits, size, &c, of the particular species, would be necessary to verify the legitimacy of this interpretation in each case.* It is necessary once more to turn to the contrast between the positions of Darwin and Wallace. According to Darwin, sexual selection has accelerated the males into gay colouring; * For a discussion of the progressive development of colouring and markings, whether in butterflies or mammals, the reader may be referred to the works of Professor Eimer, especially to his work on Lepidoptera. Reference should also be made to Weismann's " Studies in the Theory of Descent," for a discussion of the markings of caterpillars and butterflies. THE SEXES, AND CRITICISM OF SEXUAL SELECTION. 3 1 according to Wallace's original view, natural selection has retarded the females (birds or butterflies) and kept them in- conspicuously plain. It is no longer difficult to establish a compromise. Both sexes have differentiated towards their respective goals, not along lines of indefinite variation, but on paths determined by the characteristic constitutions. In other words, the secondary dimorphism has a definite physiological basis in the primary sex-difference. If this interpretation of the origin of the variants be granted, it remains a matter of observation, experiment, and statistics to determine how far the limits are fixed by natural selection (in Wallace's cases), or by sexual selection (in Darwin's). The present position allows the efficacy of natural and sexual selection as limiting, eliminat- ing, in a sense directive, factors, but regards gay colouring as the expression of the relative predominance of katabolism in the male sex, and quiet plainness as equally natural to the pre- dominantly anabolic females. At a later stage something more will be said of natural selection, and its limits as an explanation of facts. But it is here desirable to emphasise, that just as we admit the importance of sexual selection as a minor accelerant in the differentiation of the sexes, so we are bound to recognise that natural selection is also continually in operation as a check to a divergence of the sexes which would otherwise tend to become extreme. If this retarding influence of natural selec- tion on the evolutionary process were not continually present, we should find cases like Bonellia and the rotifers much commoner than they are among animals. But it is an error to exaggerate this limiting action into an explanation of the process itself. THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. SUMMARY. 1-3. A broader basis must be sought from which to understand the differences between the sexes. A general survey shows that the males are more active in habit, the females more passive; that the males tend to be smaller and to have a higher body-temperature, while the females tend to be larger and to live longer. 4. The close association of secondary sexual characters with the re- productive function is shown in the period or in the periodicity of their development, in the effects of castration, in the peculiarities of aged females, &c. Richer pigmentation, and other male characteristics, may be interpreted as expressions of the relative katabolic predominance in the constitution of males, as opposed to the relative anabolic preponderance of the females. 5. Sexual selection, as an explanation of secondary sexual characters, does not account for origins nor incipient stages, postulates subtle aesthetic sensitiveness, and is beset by numerous minor difficulties. Yet the opposed positions of Darwin and Wallace both emphasise indubitable facts; while the criticisms of Mivart, the theory of Brooks, and the suggestions of Rolph, Mantegazza, and others, lead on towards a deeper analysis. The general conclusion reached, recognises sexual selection (so far with Darwin) as a minor accelerant, natural selection (so far with Wallace) as a retarding "brake," on the differentiation of sexual characters, which essentially find a constitutional or organismal origin in the relatively katabolic or anabolic diathesis which characterises males and females respectively. LITERATURE. Brooks, Darwin, Mivart, Wallace. — As before. Cunningham, J. T. — Sexual Dimorphism. London, 1900. Curatolo, G. E., and Taruli.i, L. — Influence of the Removal of the Ovaries on Metabolism. Edinburgh Med. Journal, 1895, PP- 1 37 -I 39. Arch. Ital. Biol., XXXIII., 1895, pp. 388-390. Eimer, G. H. T. — Die Enstehung der Arten auf Grund von Vererben erworbener Eigenschaften, nach den Gesetzen organischen Wachsens. Jena, 1S88. Fowler, G. H. — Effects of Castration. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1894, pp. 485-494. Geddes, P. — Articles Reproduction, Sex, Variation and Selection. Encycl. Brit. Also, On the Theory of Growth, Reproduction, Sex, and Heredity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. , 1885-86. Hering, E. — Theory of the Functions in Living Matter (1888). Trans. by F. A. Welby. Brain, 1S97, pp. 232-258. Keller, C. A. — Evolution of the Colours of North American Land- Birds. P. Calif. Acad., III., 1893, pp. 361, 19 pis. THE SEXES, AND CRITICISM OF SEXUAL SELECTION. 33 Kennel, J. — Studien iiber sexuellen Dimorphismus, Variation und ver- wandte Erscheinungen. Schr. Nat. Ges. Dorpat, IX. (1896), p. 64. Oudemans, J. Th.— Zool. Jahrb., XII., 1898, pp. 71-88, 3 pis., 2 figs. Rolph, W. H. — Biologische Probleme. Leipzig, 1884. Rousselet, C. F. — On the Male of Rhinops vitrea. J. R. Micr. Soc, part 116, 1897, pp. 4-9, I pi. Sellheim, O. — Beitrage zur Geburtshilfe und Gyn'akologie, I. (1898), pp. 229-246; and II. (1899), pp. 236-259. Weismann, A. — Studies in the Theory of Descent (Meldola's Transla- tion). London, 1880-82. The Germ-Plasm. London, 1893. CHAPTER III. The Determination of Sex (Hypotheses and Observations). So far the differences between the sexes as observed in adult forms. Attention must now be turned to the origin of sex itself in the individual organism. The historic beginning of sex will be discussed at a later stage; the present problem concerns the factors which determine whether any given organism will develop into a male or into a female. The question, in other words, is that usually known as the determination of sex. § i. The Period at which the Sex is Determined. — Every organism, whether male or female, develops from a fertilised egg-cell, apart of course from the occurrence of asexual and parthenogenetic reproduction. This material, which in one case develops into a male, in another into a female, is, so far as our experience can go, always the same; andwhen the sex of the organism is absolutely decided, is a question to which no general answer can be given. In the higher animals (birds and mammals) it is possible at quite an early date in embryonic life to tell whether the young organism will turn into a male or a female, though in the very earliest stages it is impossible to determine whether the rudiment of the reproductive organs is going to become a testis or an ovary. But in lower vertebrates, such as frogs, the period of embryonic indifference is greatly prolonged; and it seems certain that a hatched tadpole, even after a tendency towards, say maleness, has actually arisen, may in certain conditions have this altered in the opposite direction. Among invertebrates, the sexual organs are often late in acquiring definite predominance in favour of either sex, — that is, the period of undecided indifference is, as one would expect, usually much longer. The factors which are influential in determining sex are numerous, and come into play at different periods. The constitution of the mother, the nutrition of the ova, the con- stitution of the father, the state of the male element when THE DETERMINATION OF SEX. 35 fertilisation occurs, the embryonic nutrition, and even the larval environment in some cases, these and yet other factors have all to be considered. Some observations by Laulanie as to the embryonic organs are of interest in this connection. He distinguishes both in birds and mammals three stages in the individual development of the reproductive organs. These he calls (1) Germiparity, (2) Hermaphroditism, (3) Differentiated Unisexuality; and regards them as parallel to the stages of historic evolu- tion - . Even for the first stage, however, when the elements are still very primitive, he would not allow the accuracy of the terms neutrality or indifference. The elements in both sexes are almost similar, but yet their future fate has been decided. Sutton has also emphasised his conviction, that in the individual development a state of embryonic hermaphroditism obtains, and main- tains that one set of elements predominates over the other in the establish- ment of the normal unisexual state. Ploss and others take up a similar position in regard to an early hermaphrodite state. It can only be con- cluded, that the higher the organism is in the series the earlier is its sexual fate sealed; and that it is only in lower vertebrates, and among backbone- less animals, that we can speak of prolonged neutrality of sex, or embryonic hermaphroditism. § 2. Ansivers to the Question: What Determines Sex ? — To the question what determines whether an organism shall develop into a male or into a female, many and varied answers have been given. At the beginning of the last century, the theories of sex were estimated at as many as five hundred, and they have gone on increasing. It is evident that even an enumeration of these is not possible, nor is it indeed desirable. As in so many other cases, our ideas respecting the determination of sex have been looked at in three different ways. For the theologian, it was enough to say that " God made male and female." In the period of academic metaphysics, still so far from ended, it was natural to refer to " inherent properties of maleness and femaleness;" and it is still a popular "explanation" to invoke undefined "natural tendencies" to account for the production of males or females. This mode of treatment, it need not be , said, is being abandoned by biologists. It is recognised that the problem is one for scientific analysis; thus the constitu- I. tion, age, nutrition, and environment of the parents must be- especially considered. These investigations, which are mainly restricted to observation and statistics, will be first noticed; the more experimental researches, and the general conclusions, will be discussed in the next chapter. Finally, a physiological 36 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. re-statement, in terms of protoplasmic metabolism, will be suggested. § 3. The theory that there are two kinds of ova, respectively destined to develop into males or females, is more than a mere begging of the question. The constitution of the ovum is undoubtedly a fact of primal importance, but we must also recognise the results of experiment, which show that later influences may also be determinative. The hypothesis of two kinds of ova was advanced, for example, by B. S. Schultze, but as the grounds for his views are not admitted as correct, only its existence need be noticed till more observations are forth- coming. Even if two kinds of ova were demonstrable, the question would remain what conditions determine the pre- dominance of this or the other kind. What is the biological meaning of a family with seven daughters and one son ? What is the biological meaning of Shufeldt's case of alternating sex in the five young birds which formed the brood of a sparrow- hawk ? The oldest was male, the next female, and so on in regular alternation. ("Amer. Naturalist," xxxii., 1898, pp. 567- 57°. 1 % § 4. Numerous authors have attached great importance to the process of fertilisation as a determinant of the sex. One of the most crude positions has been that of Canestrini, who ascribed the determination of sex to the number of sperms entering the ovum : — The more sperms, the greater the tendency to male offspring. It has, however, been shown by Fol, Pfluger, Hertwig, and others, that " polyspermy," or the entrance of more than one sperm, is extremely rare, is in fact generally impossible. In some of the cases where it is known to occur, it indicates a pathological condition of the egg-shell, and tends to produce abnormalities. Pfluger diluted the seminal fluid of male frogs, and found that no change resulted in the normal numerical proportion of the sexes. The case of drones, furthermore, where males are known to arise from unfertilised ova, is a familiar example, exactly counter to Canestrini's proposition, which may in fact be dismissed as wholly untenable. § 5. Time of Fertilisation. — With greater weight various authorities have insisted upon the time of fertilisation. Thus, according to Thury (1863), followed by Dusing (1883), an ovum fertilised soon after liberation tends to produce a female, while an older ovum will rather develop into a male. As a practical breeder Thury claimed to determine the sex of cattle upon this principle; Cornaz and Knight have both practically confirmed this; while Girou has pointed out that female flowers fertilised as soon as they were able to receive pollen tended to produce female offspring. Hertwig has also shown that the internal phenomena of fertilisation vary somewhat with the age of the ovum at the time. Hensen is inclined to accept the general accuracy of Thury's conclusion, but extends it to the male element as well. ' ' A very favourable condition in both ovum and THE DETERMINATION OF SEX. 37 sperm will probably lead to the formation of a female." "According to its condition, a sperm may either insufficiently corroborate the favourable state of the ovum, or constitutionally strengthen an ovum less satisfactorily conditioned." A side-light is thrown on this by Vernon's experiments on hybridising sea-urchins, which show that "the characteristics of the hybrid offspring depend directly on the relative degrees of maturity of the sexual products" ("Phil. Trans.," Series B, vol. cxc. (1898), pp. 465-529). The Summary of Statistics bearing on Relative Number of Males and Females. Observer. No. of Births. Locality. Father older. Proportion of Males to 100 Females. Father of equal age. Proportion of Males to 100 Females. Father younger. Proportion of Males to 100 Females. Average Propor- tion of Males to 100 Females. Remarks. Hofacker 1,996 Tubingen 117.8 92.0 90-6 I07-5 Sadler 2,068 England 121. 4 94.8 86.5 114.7 Gohlert 4.584 108. 93-3 82.6 ■ *°5-3 Legoyt 52)3" Paris 104.49 102.14 97-5 102.97 Boulenger 6,006 Calais 109.98 107.92 101.63 107.9 Noirot 4,000 Dijon 99-7 116.0 103.5 Breslau 8,084 Zurich 103.9 103. 1 117.6 106.6 Stieda 100,590 Alsace- Lorraine 105.03 108.39 106.27 Contradictory. Berner 267,946 Sweden 104.61 106.23 107.45 106.0 Contradictory (see text). same observer has shown that the degree of staleness of the ova and sperms of sea-urchins has an appreciable effect on the development ("P. Roy. Soc," lxv. (1899), pp. 3SO-360)- § 6. Age of Parents— -Hofacker (1823) and Sadler (1830) independently published a body of statistics, each including about 2,000 births, in favour of the generalisation that when the male parent is the older the offspring are preponderatingly male ; while if the parents be of the same age, or 38 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. a fortiori if the male parent be the younger, female offspring appear in increasing majority. This conclusion, generally known as Hofacker's and Sadler's law, has received both confirmation and perplexing contradiction. It has been confirmed by Gohlert, Boulenger, Legoyt, and others, and by some breeders of stock and birds, but is denied by other practical authori- ties, and directly contradicted by the recent statistics of Stieda, from Alsace-Lorraine, and of Berner, from Scandinavia. The above table (in its upper part taken mainly from Hensen, after CEsterlen) shows vividly how much the results of Stieda and Berner conflict with the law of Hofacker and Sadler. In regard to Berner's statistics, it ought to be further noted that the figures quoted refer to cases where the father or mother is only from I to 10 years the older. If the father be more than ten years older, the male majority is.103.54; if the mother be more than ten years older, the proportion is 104.10, again against Hofacker's and Sadler's conclusion. Compared with the above human statistics, Schlechter's results in regard to horses also militate agaimt the alleged law. In regard to plants, various naturalists have drawn attention to the influence of age upon sex. The following observations are quoted by Heyer: — In Leontarus domestica, according to Rumpf, the female plant may bear male blossoms before its proper female flowers. In Moms nigra, and in other cases, according to Miller, male flowers may be borne first, and afterwards fruit. Treviranus observed that the first flowers of beech, chestnut, and other trees are male. Clausen gives similar examples; and Hoffmann notes that in the horse-chestnut, and several other cases, male flowers appear first, and afterwards hermaphrodites or females. Most of the results in regard to the influence of age are, however, extremely unsatisfactory and conflicting. This is evident from the above statistics. The law of Hofacker and Sadler cannot be regarded as in any sense established. In fact, as Hensen remarks, unless statistics are enormously large they prove very little. The number of other factors besides parental age which may operate in any case is evidently great, — health, nutrition, frequency of sexual intercourse, abstinence after the birth of a male, and the like, all reduce the feasibility of the statistical method. At present, at any rate, we are not justified in ascribing much importance to the relative age of the parent except as a secondary factor, influential doubtless in relation to nutrition. § 7. Comparative Vigour. — The best known, and probably still most influential, theory is that of " comparative vigour." As elaborated by Girou and others, this hypothesis connects the sex of the' offspring with that of the more vigorous parent. It cannot be said, however, that facts bear out the case. Thus consumptive mothers produce a great excess of daughters, while Girou's theory would lead us to expect the opposite. THE DETERMINATION OF SEX. 39 We require in fact to have " vigour " analysed out into its component factors, and in so doing we shall afterwards find not only facts but reasons in favour of the conclusion, in part included in the above theory, that highly nourished females tend to produce female offspring. That form of the hypo- thesis which refers the determination of sex to " genital superiority," or to "relative ardency," can hardly be seriously considered. In this connection it has been maintained that in " marriages of love," after a short betrothal, female offspring predominate ; and a number of other interesting facts of a like nature are suggested. Some scepticism as to the practi- cability of such inductions is, however, inevitable. § 8. Starkweather's Laiv of Sex. — Closely allied to the theory of comparative vigour is that elaborately worked out by Starkweather, which is suggestive enough to deserve separate -summary. He starts from a discussion of the alleged superi- ority of either sex. Few maintain that the sexes are essen- tially equal, still fewer that the females excel ; the general bias of authority has been in favour of the males. From the earliest ages philosophers have contended that woman is but an undeveloped man ; Darwin's theory of sexual selection presupposes a superiority and an entail in the male line ; for Spencer, the development of woman is early arrested by procreative functions. In short, Darwin's man is as it were an evolved woman, and Spencer's woman an arrested man. This notion of the superiority of males has formed the basis of many theories of sex. As a good illustration of this opinion, a few sentences may be quoted from Richarz: — "The sex is not a quality transmitted from the parents, but has its basis in the degree of organisation attained by the offspring. The male sex represents to a certain extent a higher grade of organisation or development in the embryo. This is attained when the reproductive efficiency of the mother is specially well developed, and the resulting male offspring more or less resembles the mother. But if the maternal reproductive power be weak, the ovum does not attain to maleness, and the resulting female offspring more or less resembles the father." Thus Hough thinks males are born when the maternal system is at its best ; more females at periods of growth, reparation, or disease. Tiedman and others regard female offspring as arrested in the original state ; while Velpau conversely regards females as degenerate from primitive maleness. 4° THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. Reacting from such speculations as to superiority of either sex, Starkweather firmly rriaintains that " neither sex is physically the superior, but both are essentially equal in a physiological sense." This is true in the average, but yet in each pair a greater or less degree of superiority on one side or other must usually be conceded. Granting this, Starkweather states, as his chief conclusion, "that sex is determined by the superior parent, also that the superior parent produces the opposite sex." Referring the reader to the Ency. Brit. Article "Sex," for some critical notes, it is enough here to notice, that just like " comparative vigour," so " superiority " has little more than verbal simplicity to recommend it, since it lumps a great variety of factors under a common name. Yet, in justice to its author, we may admit that it is the algebraic sum of these which he aims at expressing. § 9. Darwin 's Position. — Neither in regard to the origin of ' sex, nor its determination in individual cases, did Darwin see further than his contemporaries. He refers to the current theories of the influence of age, period of impregnation, and the like ; and further contributes a great body of statistics on the numerical proportions of the sexes, and the supposed influence of polygamy. "There is reason," he says, "to suspect that in some cases man has by selection indirectly influenced his own sex-producing powers." He falls back upon the unanalysed " belief that the tendency to produce either sex would be inherited like almost every other peculiarity, for instance, that of producing twins." " In no case, as far as we can see, would an inherited tendency to produce both sexes in equal numbers, or to produce one sex in excess, be a direct advantage or disadvantage to certain individuals more than to others ; . . . and therefore a tendency of this kind could not be gained through natural selection." " I formerly thought that when a tendency to produce the two sexes in equal numbers was advantageous to the species, it would follow from natural selection, but I now see that the whole problem is so intricate that it is safer to leave its solution for the future." Any other hints that Darwin threw out, have been so well elaborated by Diising's work on the advantageous self-regula- tion of the sex-proportions, that reference to the latter is more profitable. § 10. Dihing on the Proportions of the Sexes, and the Regulation of these. — In an important work, Diising has THE DETERMINATION OF SEX. 4 1 recently treated the whole subject with some synthetic result. He recognises that the fates or factors determining the sex are manifold, and operate at different periods. Much is determined by the condition of the reproductive elements — i.e., by the con- stitution and habits of the parents ; much depends also on the period of fertilisation ; while again the nutrition of the embryo may be of moment. Diising has collected a great body of facts, from both plants and animals, in favour of his conclu- sions; but the copious summary of his work, given in the article "Sex" already referred to, need not here be repeated, while some of his experimental results will be included in the next chapter. Diising's memoir is very important, however, for this special reason, that he analyses what may be termed the mechanism by which the proportion of the sexes is regulated. Instead of vaguely referring the whole matter to natural selection, he shows in detail how the numbers are in a sense self-regulating, how there is always produced a majority of the sex that is wanted. That is to say, if one sex be in the decided minority, or under conditions which come to the same thing, then a majority of that sex will be produced. If there be, for instance, a great majority of males, there is the greater likelihood of the ova being fertilised early, but that means a probable pre- ponderance of female offspring, and thus the balance is restored. It would be rash to say that in every case he makes out his contention, but his general argument, that disturbances in the proportion of the sexes bring about their own compensation, is carefully and convincingly worked out. ' § ii. Sex of Twins. — It sometimes happens among many different classes of animals that from one ovum two organisms develop. We have then a case of "true" twins, as opposed to cases where multiple offspring do not arise from one ovum. Such "true" twins are said to occur not' uncommonly in the human species, and are either most markedly similar to one another or strongly dissimilar. From a very early date an exception to this rule has been known in regard to cattle, and applies to some other organisms as well. From the careful researches of Spiegelberg and others, it appears that in cattle (a) the twins may be both female and then both normal, or (b) that the sexes may be different and normal, or (c) that both may be males, in which case one always exhibits the peculiar abnormality known as a. "free-martin." The internal organs are male, but the external accessory organs are female, and there are also rudimentary female ducts. No theory has yet explained the facts of this case. 42 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. It is now necessary, with Busing for transition, to pass from the historical mode of treatment to something more con- structive. Leaving mere hypotheses behind, as well as theories based on insufficient statistics, an induction from experimental evidence will be built up in the following chapter. THE DETERMINATION OF SEX. 43 SUMMARY. 1. The epoch at which the sex is finally determined is variable in different animals, and diverse factors operate at successive epochs. 2. Theological and metaphysical theories of sex have preceded the scientific; observation and statistics have been resorted to before experi- ment; and over 500 theories in all have been set forth. 3-6^ That there are two kinds of ova is still for the most part an assumption; that the entrance of more than one spermatozoon normally occurs, and is a determining factor, is erroneous. Thury's emphasis on the age of the ovum when fertilised is probably justified; while Hensen extends this notion to the male element as well. The age of the parents is probably only of secondary import, and the law of Hofacker and Sadler is not confirmed. 7, 8. Theories of " comparative vigour " and the like must be dis- missed; while Starkweather's theory of the relative superiority of either sex, and of the influence of this on the sex of the offspring, requires further analysis. 9, 10. Darwin's position contains nothing novel, and has been superseded by Diising's synthetic treatment and explanation of the self-regulating numerical proportion of the sexes. 11. From this point, after a note on the similar sex of "true'' twins, we pass to the experimental data and constructive treatment. LITERATURE. Berner. — Hj. Om Kjonsdannelsens Aarsager, En biologisk Studie (with numerous references). Christiania, 1883. Born, G. — Experimented Untersuchungen iiber die Entstehung der Geschlechtsunterschiede. Breslauer aerztliche Zeitschrift. 1881. Ci.eisz, A. — Recherches des lois qui president a la creation des Sexes. Paris, 1899, pp. 81 (with bibliography). Cohn, L. — Die willkiirliche Bestimmung des Geschlechts. 2nd ed. Wurzburg, 1898. Darwin, C— The Descent of Man, Chap. VIII. London, 187 1. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. Lond. D USING, C. — Die Regulierung des Geschlechtsverhaltnisses bei der Vermehrung der Menschen, Thiere, und Pflanzen. Jena, 1884; or, Jen. Zeitsch. f. Naturw., XVII., 1883. Geddes, P. — As before. Girou DK Buzareingues. — De la generation. Paris, 1828.. HiiNNEBERG, B. — Wodurch wird das Geschlechtsverhaltnis beim Men- schen und den hoheren Tieren beeinflusst. Anatomische Ergebnisse (Merkel and Bonnet), VII., 1897, pp. 697-721. Hensen, V.— Physiologie der Zeugung. Hermann's Handbuch der Physiologie, Bd. VI., pp. 304, with references to Ploss, Schultze, &c. Leipzig, 1 88 1. His, W. — Theorien der geschlechtlichen Zeugung. Arch. f. Anthropologic, Bde.J-V.-VI. 44 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. Hofacker.— Ueber die Eigenschaften, welche sich bei Menschen und Thieren auf die Nachkommen vererben. Tubingen, 1828. Janke, H.— Die willkiirliche Hervorbringung des Geschlechts. 2nd ed. Berlin, 1888. Laulanie\ F. — Comptes Rendus, CI., pp. 593-5. 1885. R01.PH, W. H.— As before. Roth, E.— Die Thatsachen der Vererbung (historical). Berlin, 1885. Pfluger, E. — Ueber die das Geschlecht bestimmenden Ursachen und die Geschlechts - verh'altnisse der Frosche. Arch. f. d. ges. Physiol., XXIX., 1882. Sadler. — The Law of Population. London, 1830. Schenk, L. — Einfluss auf das Geschlechtsverh'altnis. Magdeburg, 1898. Schlechter. — Ueber die Ursachen welche das Geschlecht bestimmen. Rev. f. Tierheilkunde. Wien, 1884. Biol. Centralblt., IV., pp. 627-9. Seligson, E. — Willkiirliche Zeugung van Knaben oder M'adchen. Miin- chen, 1895. Starkweather. — The Law of Sex. London, 1883. Stieda. — Das Sexual Verhaltniss bei Geborenen. Strasburg, 1875. Sutton, J. B. — General Pathology. London, 1886. Thury. — Ueber des Gesetz der Erzeugung der Geschlechter. Leipzig, 1863. Wappceus. — Allgemeine Bevolkerungs-Statistik. Leipzig, 1861. Watase. — On the Phenomena of Sex-Differentiation. Journal of Mor- phology, 1892. Wilckens, M. — Untersuchungen iiber das Geschlechtsverhiiltnis. Berlin, 1886. CHAPTER IV. The Determination of Sex. (Experiment and Rationale.') § i. Influence of Nutrition. — Throughout nature the influence of food is undoubtedly one of the most important environ- mental factors. To Claude Bernard, indeed, the whole problem of evolution was very much a question of variations of nutrition. " L'evolution, c'est l'ensemble constant de ces alternatives de la nutrition ; c'est la nutrition considered dans sa realite, em- brassee d'un coup d'ceil a. travers le temps." It is fitting that we should begin our survey of the factors known to influence sex with the fundamental function of nutrition. (a) The Case of Tadpoles. — Not a few investigators who have passed from statistics and hypothesis to experiment and induction, have found their material in tadpoles, where the sex seems to remain for a comparatively long period indeterminate. If we take the verdict of Yung, who has had much experience with these forms, tadpoles pass through a hermaphrodite stage, in common, according to other authorities, with most animals. During this phase external influences, and especially food, decide their fate as regards sex, though the hermaphroditism, as we shall afterwards see, sometimes persists in adult life. It is fair, however, to notice that Pfliiger gives a somewhat different account of the actual facts, distinguishing among tadpoles three varieties — (a) distinct males, (b) distinct females, and (c) herma- phrodites. In the last, testes, or male organs, develop round primitive ovaries, and if the tadpoles are to become males the enclosed female organs are absorbed. Adopting the view stated by Yung, we shall simply state the striking results of one series of observations. When the tadpoles were left to themselves, the percentage of females was rather in the majority. In three lots, the proportions of females to males were as follows : — 54 : 46 ; 61 : 39 ; and 56 144. The average number of females was thus about 5 7 in the hundred. 4^ THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. In the first brood, by feeding one set with beef, Yung raised the percentage of females from 54 to 78; in the second, with fish, the percentage rose from 61 to 81 ; while in the third set, when the flesh of frogs was supplied, the percentage rose from 56 to 92. That is to say, in the last case the result of altered diet was that there were 92 females to 8 males. From the experience and carefulness of the observer, these striking results are entitled to great weight. (b) Case of Bees. — The three kinds of inmates in a beehive are known to every one as queens, workers, and drones ; or, as fertile females, imperfect females, and males. What are th<~ factors determining the differences between these three forms ? In the first place, it is believed that the eggs which give rise to drones are not fertilised, while those that develop into queens and workers have the normal history. But what fate rules the destiny of the two latter, determining whether a given ovum The Queen (a), Worker (c), and Drone (b) of the Common Hive-Bee. will develop into the possible mother of a new generation, or into the better-brained but non-fertile working female? It seems certain that the fate mainly lies in the quantity and quality of the food. Royal diet, and plenty of it, develops the reproductive organs of the future queens ; sparser and plainer food retards the sexuality of the future workers, in which reproductive organs do not develop. Up to a certain point, the nurse bees can THE DETERMINATION OF SEX. A7 determine the future destiny of their charge by changing the diet, and this in some cases is certainly done. If a larva on the way to become a worker receive by chance some crumbs from the royal superfluity, the reproductive function may develop, and what are called "fertile workers," to a certain degree above the average abortiveness, result ; or, by direct intention, a worker grub may be reared into a queen bee. The following table, after a recent analysis by A. von Planta, shows the differences of diet as far as solids are concerned. For queens 69.38 per cent., for drones 72.75 per cent., and for workers 71.63 per cent, is water. SOLIDS. Queens. Drones. i to 4 days. Drones. After 4 days. Workers. Nitrogenous Fatty Glucose Ashes 45-14 1.1-55 20.39 4.06 55-9* 11.90 9-57 31.67 4-74 38.49 2.02 51.21 •6.84 27.65 From the above, it is seen that the queen larvje get a quantity of fatty material double that given to the workers. The drones at first receive a large percentage of nitrogenous material, but this soon falls below the share which workers and queens obtain. The fatty material, at first large, soon falls to about a third of that given to the queens. Hence the percentage of glucose, except at first, is so much larger than in the other two cases. It is not necessary, however, to go into details to see the importance of the main point, that differences of nutrition, in great part at least, determine the all-important distinctions between the development and retardation of femaleness. Nor are there many facts more significant than this simple and well- known one, that within the first eight days of larval life, the addition of a little food will determine the striking structural and functional differences between worker and queen, Eimer has drawn attention to the interesting correlation ex- hibited in the fact that a larva destined to become a worker, but converted into a queen, attains with the increased sexuality all the little structural and psychological differences which .otherwise distinguish a queen. Regarding fertilisation as a sort of nutrition, he considers drones, workers, and queens as three terms of a series, and the same view is suggested by Rolph. Eimer recalls some interesting corroborations from humble bees. There the queen mother, awakened from her winter sleep by the spring sun, makes a nest, collects food, and lays her first 4 8 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. brood. These are not too abundantly supplied with nourish- ment, the queen having much upon her shoulders ; they develop into small females, workers in a sense, but yet fertile, though only to the extent of producing drones. By-and-by a second brood of workers is born; these have the advantage of the existence of elder sisters, are more abundantly nourished, and develop into large females. Still, like the first brood, they pro- duce drones, though occasionally females. Finally, with the advantage of two previous broods of small and large females, the future queens are born. The above facts not only afford an interesting corroboration of the influence of nutrition upon sexuality, but are of importance as suggesting the origin of the more highly specialised society of the hive bee. (c) Von SiebohVs Experiments. — With a somewhat different purpose than that at present pursued, Von Siebold made a series of careful observa- tions on a species of wasp, Nematus ventricosus. These afford, as Rolph has noted, some valuable results in regard to the determination of sex. In this wasp, the fertilised ova, unlike those of hive bees, develop into males as well as females ; while the unfertilised, or parthenogenetic eggs, may pro- duce females in small percentage. From spring onwards, as warmth and food both increased, Von Siebold estimated the percentages of males and females in broods of larvte reared from fertilised ova. The results of a series of observations may be condensed in a table : — End of Larval Period (Pupation). No. of Females to 100 Males. No. of Females. No. of Males. 15th June July July End of August September 14 77 269 340 500 100 19 86 S79 136 66 215 As Rolph remarks, the results are not altogether satisfactory for the present purpose, "but this much is clear, that the percentage of females in- creases from spring to August, and then diminishes. We may conclude without scruple, that the production of females from fertilised ova increases with the temperature and with the food supply {Assimilationrteistung), and decreases as these diminish." From the work of Rolph, which is full of a suggestiveness which the author unfortunately did not live to elaborate, we shall quote another paragraph summing up further experiments of Von Siebold : — "Not less instructive," he says, "are the experiments with unfertilised ova (see Table). "This table shows the same general result as before. The more" abundant the metabolism (Stoffwec/isel) and the nutrition, the greater THE DETERMINATION OF SEX. 49 tendency to the production of females, which at the beginning and at the end are wholly absent. In the above series of experiments, they only appear when the metabolism and the nutrition were so abundant that the entire development of the young wasps only occupied eighteen or No. of Duration of Embryonic Sex. Experiment ■ and Larval State. II 21 days All Males. 12 19 ,. All Males. 13 18 ., 493 Males. 2 Females. 14 17 .. 265 ,, 2 ,, IS 17 ,> 374 ., 8 16 18 ,, 168 „ 1 17 24 ,. 1 j, fewer days up to the period of pupation." The peculiarity in this last case, if the experiments were correct, is that in parthenogenesis, where the production of males is the normal condition, favourable environmental influences anoear to introduce females. Two Forms of a Common Plant-Louse or Aphis.— This figure may serve to illustrate three different things, — a winged male and a wingless female; a winged and a wingless parthenogenetic female; a winged sexual female, and an ordinary wingless parthenogenetic female.— From Kessler. (d) Case of Ap hides. —One of the most familiar illustrations of the influence of nutrition upon sex, is found in the history of the plant-lice or aphides, which is indeed full of other suggestions in regard to the whole theory of sex and reproduc- tion. Details in regard to these plant-lice, which multiply so rapidly upon our rose-bushes, fruit-trees, and the like, differ 4 SO THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. somewhat in the various species, but the general facts are_ recognised to be as follows. During the summer months, with favourable temperature and abundant food, the aphides produce parthenogenetically generation after generation of females. The advent of autumn, however, with its attendant cold and scarcity of food, brings about the birth of males, and the consequent recurrence of strictly sexual reproduction. In the artificial environment of a greenhouse, equivalent to a perpetual summer of warmth and abundant food, the partheno- genetic succession of females has been experimentally observed for four years, — it seems in fact to continue until lowering of the temperature and diminution of the food at once re-intro- duce males and sexual reproduction. (e) Butterflies and Moths. — Still keeping to insects, we may note Mrs Treat's interesting experiment, that if caterpillars were shut up and starved before entering the chrysalis state the resultant butterflies or moths were males, while others of the same brood highly nourished came out females. Gentry too has shown for moths that innutritious or diseased food produced males, and suggests this as a partial explanation of the excess of male insects in autumn, although we suspect that temperature is in this instance probably more important. It should be noted, however, that Paulton's experiments on the sexes of larvae of Smerinthus pofiuli give no support to the conclusion that the sex can be determined by external con- ditions during larval life. The larger female larvae require more food, and when supplies are reduced they tend to starve first ("Trans. Entomol. Soc. London," 1893, pp. 451-6). {/) Crustaceans. — In support of the same contention, Rolph has drawn attention to the following among other facts. One of the brine shrimps {Artemia salina) resembles not a few crustaceans in the local and periodic scarcity or absence of males, associated of course with parthenogenesis. At Mar- seilles, Rolph says, this artemia lives in especially favourable conditions, as its large size plainly indicates ; there it produces only females. Where the conditions of existence are less prosperous, it produces males as well. "A certain maximum of abundance and optimum of vital conditions in partheno- genetic animals — daphnids and aphides, Apus, Branchipus, Artemia, and numerous other crustaceans — produce females ; while less favourable conditions are associated with the pro- duction of males." In regard, however, to water-fleas THE DETERMINATION OF SEX. 5 1 (daphnids), it is fair to notice that Rolph's conclusions do not quite consist with Weismann's, who, with unique experi- ence in regard to these curious little animals, is disinclined to allow the direct influence of temperature and nutrition in the matter. (g) In regard to Rotifers (Hydatina), Maupas maintains that temperature is the sex-determining factor, and that the sex of the offspring is determined two generations in advance ! His experiments led him to conclude that when the ovum is being differentiated in the ovum, the temperature determines whether it shall develop into a male-producing or a female- producing individual.. Nussbaum, on the other hand, disputes the conclusiveness of this result, and maintains that nutrition is the determining factor : females of Hydatina which have been insufficiently fed during early life afterwards lay only male eggs, while well-nourished forms produce female eggs. (h) Mammals. — When we pass to higher animals, the diffi- culties of proving the influence of nutrition upon sex are much greater. Yet there are decisive observations which go to increase the cumulative evidence. Thus an important experi- ment was long ago made by Girou, who divided a flock of three hundred ewes into equal parts, -of which the one-half were extremely well fed and served by two young rams, while the others were served by two mature rams and kept poorly fed. The proportion of ewe lambs in the two cases was re- spectively sixty and forty per cent. In spite of the combination of two factors, the experiment is certainly a cogent one. Diising brings forward further evidence in favour of the same conclusion, noting, for instance, that it is usually the heavier ewes which bring forth ewe lambs. He emphasises the fact that the females having a more serious reproductive sacrifice, are more dependent on variations of nutrition than males. Even in birds, as Stolzmann points out, there is a much greater flow of blood to the ovary than to the testes, — the demands are greater, and the consequences therefore more serious if these are not fulfilled. (?) In the human species, lastly, the influence of nutrition, though hard to estimate, is more than hinted at. Ploss may be mentioned as an authority who has emphasised this factor in homo. Statistics seem to show, that after an epidemic or a war the male births are in a greater majority than is usually the case. Diising also points out that females with small 52 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX, placenta and little menstruation bear more boys, and contends that the number of males varies with the harvests and prices. In towns, and in prosperous families, there seem to be more females, while males are more numerous in the country and among the poor. Schenk has (1898) re-enunciated the view that nutrition is the chief determining factor in deciding the sex of offspring. But his evidence is quite insufficient ; indeed, when it is critically examined it is seen to consist of three or four cases. (_/) Determination of Sex in Plants. — It is at present ex- tremely difficult to come to any very satisfactory conclusion in regard to the influence of nutrition upon the sex of plants. The whole subject, as far as its literature is concerned, has been recently discussed by Heyer, but his survey is by no means a sanguine one. His conclusions, in fact, seem to land him in a scepticism as to all modification of the organism by environmental influences, which we should of course be far from sharing. It must be admitted that the experiments of Girou (1823), Haberlandt (1869), and others, yielded no cer- tain result ; while the conclusions of some others are conflict- ing enough to justify not indeed Heyer's despair, but his present caution. Still a few investigations, especially those of Meehan (1878), which are essentially corroborated by Dusing (1883), go to show, for some cases, that abundant moisture and nourishment do tend to produce females. Some of Meehan's points are extremely instructive. Thus old branches of conifers, overgrown and shaded by younger ones, produce only male inflorescence. In the American Cory/us rostrata, and in many other instances, he is convinced that in early stages the sex of a flower-bud is undetermined, and that its determination as a male or female flower is mainly the result of the nutritive conditions ("Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila- delphia," 1899, pp. 84-86). Various botanists, quoted by Heyer, confirm one another in the observation that prothallia of ferns grown in unfavourable nutritive conditions produce only antheridia (male organs), and no archegonia (female organs). The botanical evidence, though by no means strong, cor- roborates the general result that good nourishment produces a preponderance of females. The contrast of the sexes in some of our common dioecious plants is here very instructive. Taking for instance the dog-mercury (Mercuriaiis perennis) of THE DETERMINATION OF SEX. 53 any shady dell, or the day lychnis (L. diurna), hardly less abundant on the sunnier slopes, experiments are still certainly wanting with regard to given plants, as to what circumstances originally determined their sexual differences ; but the fact of superior constitutional vegetativeness in the females is here so peculiarly obvious, that it can hardly fail to arouse a strong impression that more or less advantageously nutritive con- ditions, whether of the embryo or of the seedling, are sufficient to account for the differences of sex. § 2. Influence of Temperature. — In this connection not a few writers have referred to an observation by Knight, which, from its comparatively ancient date, perhaps deserves to be recorded in his own words, if only to show the necessity of caution in such matters. A water-melon was grown in a heated glass-house, where the temperature sometimes rose on warm days to 110° Fahr. "The plant grew with equal health and luxuriance, and afforded a most abundant blossom; but all its flowers were male. This result did not in any degree surprise me, for I had many years previously succeeded, by long con- tinued very low temperature, in making cucumber plants produce female flowers only; and I entertain but little doubt that the same fruit stalks might be made, in this and the preceding species, to support either male or female flowers in obedience to external causes." This experiment was obviously more sanguine than satis- factory. Heyer justly points out that of the water-melon only a single plant was taken. Furthermore, he says, the water- melon in nature usually bears only female flowers on the apices of the older twigs, and may bear only a minimum number of these. Knight's observations on cucumbers are also open to serious objections, and were too scanty to prove anything. Meehan finds that the male plants of hazel grow more actively in heat than the female; and Ascherson has made the interesting observation that the water-soldier (Stratiotes aloides) bears only female flowers north of 52 lat., and from 50° south- wards only male ones. On the other hand, Molliard maintains ("Comptes Rendus," cxxvii., 1898, pp. 669-671) that in the case of dog's mercury {Mercurialis annua) a high temperature favours the production of female individuals, but whether the heat simply promotes especially the development of the female seeds, or has some direct effect on the nature of the seed, is left undetermined. The same experimenter maintains in regard 54 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. to the hop that the sex is not absolutely determined in the seed, and that a transformation may be observed from male to female inflorescences under conditions that are very unfavour- able to the development of the vegetative organs, e.g., feeble illumination. In the human species, Dusing and others have noted that more males are born during the colder months; and Schlechter has reached the same results from observations upon horses. The temperature of the time, not of birth but of sex determina- tion, is however more important; nor must it be forgotten that temperature may have many indirect and subtle influences. § 3. Summary of Factors. — If we now sum up the case, it must first be recognised that a number of factors co-operate in the determination of sex ; but that the most important of these may be more and more resolved into plus or minus nutrition, operating upon parent, sex elements, embryo, and in some cases larvae. (a) Starting with the parent organisms themselves, we find this general conclusion most probable, — that adverse circum- stances, especially of nutrition, but also including age and the like, tend to the production of males, the reverse conditions favouring females. (i) As to the reproductive elements, a highly nourished ovum, compared with one less favourably conditioned, in every probability will tend to a female rather than to a male develop- ment. Fertilisation, when the ovum is fresh and vigorous, before waste has begun to set in, will corroborate the same tendency. (c) Then if we accept Sutton's opinion as to a transitory hermaphrodite period in most animals, from which the transition to unisexuality is effected by the hypertrophy of the female side or preponderance of the male in respective cases, the vast importance of early environmental influences must be allowed. The longer the period of sexual indifference (though this term be an objectionable one) continues, the more important must be those outside factors, whether directly operative or indirectly through the parent. Here again, then, favourable conditions of nutrition, temperature, and the like, tend towards the pro- duction of females, the reverse increase the probability of male preponderance. The general conclusion, then, more or less clearly grasped by numerous investigators, is that favourable nutritive con- THE bETERMINATION OF SEX. §§ ditions tend to produce females, and unfavourable conditions males. § 4. Let us express this, however, in more precise language. Such conditions as deficient or abnormal food, high tempera- ture, deficient light, moisture, and the like, are such as tend to induce a preponderance of waste over repair, — a relatively kata- bolic habit of body, — and these conditions tend to result in the production of males. Similarly, the opposed set of factors, such as abundant and rich nutrition, abundant light and mois- ture, favour constructive processes, i.e., make for a relatively anabolic habit, and these conditions tend to result in the pro- duction of females. With some element of uncertainty, we may also include the influence of the age and physiological prime of either sex, and of the period of fertilisation. ' But the general conclusion is tolerably secure, — that in the determina- tion of sex, influences inducing a relative predominance of katabolism tend to result in production of males, as those favouring a relative predominance of anabolism similarly in- crease the probability of females. § 5. This is not all, however; the above conclusion is in- deed valuable, but it acquires a deeper significance when we take it in connection with the result of a previous chapter. There it was seen, as the conclusion of an independent induc- tion, that the males were forms of smaller size, more active habit, higher temperature, shorter life, &c; and that the females were the larger, more passive, vegetative, and conservative forms. Theories of "inherent" maleness or femaleness were rejected, since practically merely verbal ; more accurately, however, they have been interpreted and replaced by a more material con- ception, which finds the bias of the whole life, the resultant of its total activities, to be a predominance of the protoplasmic processes either on the side of disruption or construction. This conclusion has still to receive cumulative proof, but one large piece of evidence is now forthcoming, that, namely, of the present chapter. If influences favouring katabolism make for the production of males, and if anabolic conditions favour females, then we are strengthened in our previous conclusion, that the male is the outcome of relatively predominant kata- bolism, and the female of relatively predominant anabolism. § 6. Weismann's Theory of Heredity. — In thinking of the environment as a factor determining the sex, it is impossible to ignore that such facts as we have noted above have some g6 THE EVOLUTION OP SEX, bearing upon the problem of heredity. Much of the recent progress in the elucidation of the facts of inheritance has been due to Weismann, who, in his theory of the continuity of the germ-plasm, has restated the very important and fundamental conception of a continuity between the reproductive elements of one generation and those of the next. To this restatement we shall afterwards have to refer; it is with another position, not peculiar to, but emphasised by the same authority, that we have here to do, viz., with his denial of the inheritance of individually acquired characters. Any new character exhibited by an organism may arise in one of two ways, which it is easy enough to distinguish theoretically; — it may be an outcrop of some property inherent in the fertilised egg-cell, that is, it may have a constitutional or germinal origin; but, on the other hand, it may be impressed upon the individual organism by the environment, or acquired in the course of its functioning, that is, it may have a functional or environmental origin. But all such functional and environmental modifications are, according to Weismann, restricted to the individual organism; they are not transmissible. In this denial of the transmission of dints from without, and of acquired habits other than constitutional, Weismann expresses a scientific scepticism, based on the one hand on the absence of data demonstrating what we may still call the current belief, and on the other hand on the improbability of modifications reacting from the " body " on the reproductive cells in such a specific and representative way that the off- spring inherit the modifications even in the slightest degree. If such a reaction do not occur, Weismann's position is secure; and though in a system saturated with alcohol, or transferred to a new climate, the reproductive cells may vary along with the body, no modification of nerve fix muscle can, as such, be transmitted in inheritance. The relative scarcity of experimental data, the divergence of opinion as to the pathological evidence, and the difficulty of applying our logical or anatomical distinctions to the intricate facts of nature, make decisive statements impossible, but it may be said that no clear case of the transmission of an acquired modification has as yet been forthcoming. Weismann's position — slightly modified to meet criticism — must not be held to imply that the germ-cells lead a "charmed life," insulated, as it were, from the general life of the body. THE DETERMINATION OP SEX. 57 That would indeed be a "physiological miracle,'' and it may be safely said that no one believes in any such apartness. At the same time, it may be useful to recall the facts of this chapter in order to avoid exaggeration of the degree to which the germ-cells are uninfluenced by modifications in the body. For in such a case as Yung's tadpoles, influence of nutrition saturated through the organism and did affect the reproductive elements, not indeed to the degree of altering any structural feature of the species, but yet to the extent of altering the natural numerical proportions of the sexes. But it must be clearly understood that this does not really touch the precise question of the inheritance of acquired characters. 5 8 the evolution op sex. SUMMARY. 1. Nutrition is one of the most important factors in determining sex. In illustration, note {a) the experiments of Yung, which raised the per- centage of females from 56 to 92 by good feeding; [b) the case of bees, where the differences between queen and worker well illustrate the enormous results of a slight nutritive advantage; also the case of humble-bees, with three successive broods increasing in nutritive prosperity and in femaleness; (c) Von Siebold's experiments with a wasp, which showed most females in favourable conditions ; (d) Aphides, in prosperity of summer, yield a succession of parthenogenetic females, in cold and scarcity of autumn males return; (e) among starved caterpillars of moths and butterflies more males survive ; (f) Rolph's observations on crustaceans ; (g) experiments on Rotifers; (h) also the facts noted by Girou, Diising, and others, on the influence of good nourishment of mammalian mothers in favouring female offspring; (z) the hints of the same results in the human species; (/) various observations in regard to plants favouring the same general conclusion. 2. As to the influence of temperature, favourable conditions again tend to femaleness of offspring, extremes to males. 3. These factors are now added up — (a) the nutrition, age, &c, of parents; (b) the condition of the sex elements; (c) the environment of embryo. 4. The generalisation is thus reached — anabolic conditions favour pre- ponderance of females, katabolic conditions tend to produce males. 5. But females have been already seen to be relatively more anabolic, and females relatively more katabolic. This view of sex is therefore confirmed. 6. The determination of sex illustrates an outside influence penetrating to the reproductive cells, but this does not touch the precise question as to the inheritance of acquired characters. LITERATURE. See works mentioned in Chapter III., especially those of Dtising, Geddes (article Sex, Ency. Brit.), Hensen, and Sutton; also those of Eimer, Geddes, and Rolph in Chapter II. Calman, J. T. — The Progress of Research on the Reproduction of the Rotifera. Nat. Science, XIII., 1898, pp. 43-51 (with bibliography). DiisiNG, C — As before; also, Die experimentelle Pruning der Theorie von der Regulirung des Geschlechtsverhaltnisses. . Jen. Zeitschr. f. Naturwiss., XIV., Supplement, 1885. Heyer, F. — Untersuchungen iiber das Verhaltniss des Geschlechtes bei einhausigen und zweih'ausigen Pflanzen, unter Berlicksichtigung des Geschlechtsverhaltnisses bei den Thieren und den Menschen. Ber. landwirthschaftl. Inst. Halle, V., 1884, pp. 1-152. Kerherve, L. B. de. — De l'apparition provoquee des males chez les Daphnies. Mem. Soc. Zool. France, VIII., 1895, PP- 200-211, 1 fig. Maupas, E. — Sur le determinisme de la sexualite chez VHydatina senta. C R. Ac. Sci. Paris, CXIII , 1891, pp. 388-390. THE DETERMINATION OP SEX. $C) Meehan, T. — Relation of Heat to the Sexes of Flowers. Proc. Acad. Nat. Science, Philadelphia (1884), pp. 111-117. Nussbaum, M.— Die Entstehung des Geschlechts bei Hydatina scuta. Arch. Mikr. Anat., XLIX., 1897, pp. 227-308. Semper, C. — The Natural Conditions of Existence as they affect Animal Life. Internat. Science Series, London, 1881. Thomson, J. A. — Synthetic Summary of the Influence of the Environment upon the Organism. Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., IX. (1888), pp. 446-499. (Supplementary to Semper's work, with bibliography. ) The History and Theory of Heredity, rroc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1889, pp. 91-116, with bibliography. The Science of Life. London, 1899. Treat. — Controlling Sex in Butterflies. Amer. Naturalist, VII., 1873. Weismann, A. — Die Continuitat des Keimplasmas als Grundlage einer Theorie der Vererbung, Jena, 1885; and numerous other papers, now translated, in 2 vols. — Essays upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems, authorised translation, edited by E. B. Poulton, S. Schonland, and A. E. Shipley, 8vo. Oxford, 1899. But especially " The Germ-Plasm : a Theory of Heredity," 1893. Wilckens, M. — Untersuchungen iiber das Geschlechtsverhaltniss und die Ursachen der Geschlechtsbildung in Haustieren. Biol. Centralblt., VI. (1886), pp. 503-510; Landwirth. JB., XV., pp. 607-610. Yung, E. — Contributions a l'Histoire de l'lnfluence des milieux Physiques sur les Etres Vivants. Arch. Zool. Exper., VII. (1878), pp. 251-282; (1883) pp. 31-55; Arch. Sci. Phys. Nat., XIV. (1885), pp. 502-522. De l'influence de la nature des aliments sur la sexualite. Comptes Rendus Ac. Sci. Paris, XCIII., 1881. De l'influence des facteurs determinant le sexe. Revue de Morale Sociale, II., No. 5, 1900, pp. 88-110. BOOK II. ANALYSIS OF SEX-ORGANS, TISSUES, CELLS. CHAPTER V. Sexual Organs and Tissues. IT is the object of this portion of the book to continue the analysis of sexual characters, but now in a deeper way, reviewing successively the organs, tissues, and cells concerned in sexual reproduction. The essential and auxiliary organs of the two sexes, the frequent combination of these in hermaphro- dite plants and animals, the sex-cells both male and female, will be discussed in order. This survey will be for the most part structural or morphological; the physiological aspects of sexual union and of fertilisation will be discussed at a later stage. § r. Essential Sexual Organs of Animals. — It is now a well- established fact that among the ciliated infusorians, which swarm especially in stagnant waters, a process occurs which cannot but be described as in part sexual reproduction. Two individuals, to all appearance alike, become temporarily asso- ciated, exchange portions of their (micro-) nuclei, and then separate.- This process of fertilisation is essential to the con- tinued vigour of the species, and will be afterwards described at length. Such a very simple form of sexual union differs from what occurs in higher animals in two conspicuous respects, — (a) the organisms are apparently quite similar in form and structure ; (6) they are unicellular, and thus there is no distinction between "body" and reproductive cells. What is fertilised by the mutual exchange in those infusorians is, roughly speaking, the entire animal, for the whole is but a corpuscle of living matter. Among the Protozoa, however, loose colonies of cells occur, which bridge the gulf between unicellular and multicellular animals. In these we find the first indications of the after- wards conspicuous difference between " body " and repro- ductive cells. From these loose colonies, certain of the units are set adrift, and meeting with others more or less like 64 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. themselves, fuse to form a double cell, virtually a fertilised ovum, from which by continuous division a fresh colony is then developed. In these transition forms there are thus reproductive cells of slight distinctness, but as yet obviously no sexual organs. When we pass to the sponges, we find colonies consisting of myriads of cells, among which there is a considerable division of labour. An outer layer (or ectoderm) usually consisting of much subordinated cells, an inner layer (or endoderm) of pre- Volvox, a colony of cells, with some set apart for reproduction, after Klein. dominantly active and well-nourished cells, a middle layer of heterogeneous constituents, can be distinguished. Every average infusorian is as good as its neighbours, so far as repro- duction of new individuals by division is concerned; in the colonial Protozoa, the units that are set adrift are very little different from their fellows that remain behind; but this ceases to be true when we pass to colonies where considerable division of labour has been established. It is certainly true that even a tiny fragment of sponge, cut off from the larger mass, may, SEXUAL ORGANS AND TISSUES. 65 if it contain sufficient samples of the body, and if the conditions be favourable, reproduce a new individual. Cultivators of bath sponges sometimes take advantage of this fact. But the sponge starts its new colonies for itself usually in quite a different way, namely, by the process of sexual reproduction. Among the cells of the middle stratum of the sponge body certain well-nourished passive cells appear. These are the ova, at first very like, but eventually well marked from the other constituent units of the layer. Besides these there are other cells, either in the same sponge or in another, which exhibit very different characters. Instead of growing large and rich in reserve material like the egg-cells or ova, they divide repeatedly into clusters of infinitesimal cells, and form in so doing the male elements or spermatozoa. The male and female cells meet one another, they form a fertilised ovum; the result is continued division of the latter till a new sponge is built up. Here then there are special reproductive cells, quite distinct from those of the "body"; and here, furthermore, these repro- ductive cells are markedly contrasted as male and female elements. As yet, however, there are no sexual organs. Passing to the next class, the stinging animals or ccelenter- ates, we find in one of the simplest and most familiar of these, the common fresh-water hydra, a good illustration of primitive sexual organs. As in sponges, a cut-off fragment of the body, if sufficient samples of the different component cells are in- cluded, is able to reconstitute the whole. But no one body- cell has of course any such power; this is possible for the fertilised ovum alone. Now this ovum occurs, not anywhere within a given layer as in sponges, but always near one spot on the body. Towards the base of the tube a protuberance of outer layer cells is developed. This forms a rudimentary ovary, or female organ. It has this peculiarity, not however unique, that while the organ consists of not a few cells, only one of these becomes an ovum. A similar protrusion, or more than one, often at the same time and on the same animal, may be recognised further up the tube, nearer the tentacles of the hydra. Smaller than the ovary, each protuberance consists of numerous small cells, most of which, multiplying by division, form male elements or spermatozoa. We have here the simplest possible male organ or testis. More elaborate organs occur in the other ccelenterates, complicated however by two interesting facts, which will be S 66 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. afterwards discussed. (a) Many of the coelenterates are well known to form elaborate colonies, — zoophytes, Portuguese men-of-war, and the like. In these, division of labour fre- quently goes further than the setting apart of special organs. Entire individuals become reproductive " persons " (as they are technically called), in contrast to the nutritive persons of the colony. (b) In some of those reproductive individuals, a curious phenomenon, known as migration of cells, has been observed by Weismann and others. The reproductive cells, arising in various parts of the body, have been shown to migrate in some cases to another part, where they find final lodgment in more or less definite organs. This occurrence is intimately associated with " alternation of generations," and will be afterwards discussed under that heading. It is far from the purpose of the present work to describe the details respecting the ovaries and testes, as they occur in the various classes of animals. It is enough for our purpose to have emphasised the fact of their gradual differentiation, and to note that they are almost always developed in association with the middle layer of the body, and usually occupy a pos- terior position on the wall of the body-cavity. The details will be found in any standard work on comparative anatomy, very conveniently for example in Professor Jeffrey Bell's " Com- parative Anatomy and Physiology," London, 1885. § 2. Associated Duc/s. — It is only in a few animals, like hydra and its allies, that the ovaries and testes are external organs, which have simply to burst to liberate their contents. They are of course usually internal, and thus arises the necessity of some means of communication with the outside world. In the simplest cases, the male elements find their way out to the surrounding medium without any specialised mode of exit. They there meet, by chance combined with physical attraction at short range, with the ova, which in the simplest cases again have found their way out in an equally primitive fashion. Thus in the enigmatical parasitic Mesozoa (Orthonectids, &c), liberation of the germs may occur by perforation or by rupture of the excessively simple bodies. In some of the marine worms (e.g. Polygordius), the liberation of the ova at least is accompanied by the fatal rupture of the mother organism, a vivid instance of reproductive sacrifice. Even in some of the common nereids, the same uneconomical mode of liberation by rupture appears to occur. The forcible rupture may be referred to pressure of the relatively large mass of growing cells which the ovaries often present. As high up as back-boned animals, the absence of ducts may be traced. Thus among the sea-squirts or tunicates, the reproductive organs are fre- quently ductless, and the same thing is true of some fishes. The sex-cells burst into the body-cavity, and thence find their way to the exterior by SEXUAL ORGANS AND TISSUES. 67 apertures. In most cases, where ducts are absent, fertilisation of the ova is external, but this is not necessarily so. In sponges, for instance, fertilisation is almost always internal. Male elements are washed in by the water-currents, find their way to the ova, and fertilise them in situ. Almost without exception, embryo-sponges, not ova, make their way to the exterior. In the higher animals, where definite ducts are present, alike for the inward passage of spermatozoa and the exit of ova or embryos, it ought further to be noticed that the ovaries can hardly ever be said to be in direct connection with their ducts. The ova usually burst from the ovary into the body-cavity, whence they are more or less immediately caught up by, or forced into the canals, by which they pass outwards. With the testes it is different, for if ducts be present, they are in direct connection with the organs. It is enough to state that in the great majority of cases ducts are associated with the essential organs. Those of the male serve for the exit of the spermatozoa, and may be terminally modified as intromittent organs. Those of the females serve either solely for the emission of unfertilised eggs, or for the reception of spermatozoa, and the subsequent exit of fertilised ova or growing embryos. In some worm-types, and in all vertebrates, from amphibians onwards, the reproductive ducts are also in various degrees associated with excretory functions. For an account of the origin of the ducts in higher animals, the reader must be referred to the embryo- logical text-books of Balfour, Hertwig, Haddon, Marshall, and others. Similarly for such modifications as that of the female duct into oviduct and uterus, reference must be made to the larger anatomical works of Gegenbaur and Wiedersheim, or for a briefer account to Parker's translation and edition of Wiedersheim's smaller text-book, and to Professor Jeffrey Bell's work already mentioned. § 3. Yolk-Glands. — As we shall afterwards see, the ovum is often furnished with a large quantity of nutrient material. This serves as the food-capital for the growing embryo or young larva. It is obtained in various ways, — from the vascular fluid, from the sacrifice of adjacent cells, or from special organs known as yolk-glands or vitellaria. The yolk-glands, as they occur for instance in some of the lower worms (turbellarians, flukes, tapeworms), are of some general interest. They repre- sent, as Graff has shown, a degenerate portion of the ovary, in which the cells have become even more highly anabolic than ova. "The origin of the yolk-gland," Gegenbaur says, "is probably to be found in the division of labour of a primitively very large ovary." In more technical language, yolk-glands are hypertrophied or hyper-anabolic portions of the ovary. Apart from this nutritive capital, the egg is often equipped with envelopes or shells of some sort, which may be furnished by special organs, or by the sacrifice of surrounding cells, or by the walls of the ducts as the eggs pass out. § 4. Organs Auxiliary to hnpregnation. — In most animals 68 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. in which internal fertilisation of the ova occurs, there are in both sexes special structures auxiliary to the function of im- pregnation. Thus the end of the male canal is commonly modified into an intromittent tube or penis, through which the male elements flow into the female duct. In the crustaceans some of the external appendages are often modified, as in the crayfish, to serve this purpose, and the same is the case with minute structures on the posterior abdomen of many insects. Sometimes, as in the snail {Helix), which may be taken as an extreme type of reproductive specialisation, separate organs are present, in which the spermatozoa are compacted into masses or packets, known as spermatophores. In most cuttle-fishes, these pass from the male ducts to one of the "arms," which thus laden is occasionally set free bodily into the mantle-cavity of the female, where it was of old mistaken for a worm, and called Heclocotylus. So in some spiders, the palps near the mouth receive the male elements, and transfer them to the female. Special storing receptacles and secreting glands are also very frequently in association with the male ducts, and there is a long list of curious modifications utilised in the process of copulation. Thus, male frogs have swollen first fingers, and gristly fishes have " claspers," which are modified parts of the hind limbs, and are inserted into the cloaca of the female. The common snails eject a limy dart (spiculum amoris), which appears to be a preliminary excitant to copulation. So too, in the female sex, the terminations of the duct may be modified for reception of the male intromittent organ, and special receptacles may be present for storing the spermatozoa. Where a single fertilisation occurs, as in the queen bee, previous to a long-continued egg-laying period, the importance of a storing organ is obvious. As the female is usually more or less passive during copulation, the adaptations for this purpose are less numerous than. in the males. It is interesting to notice, that, among amphibians, where the male often takes upon him- self distinctly maternal duties, one case is known where the female seems more active than the male during copulation. § 5- Egg~£- a yi n i Organs. — Cases where the ova simply pass out into the water, or on to the land, are of course associated with the absence of any special organs. In a great many animals, however, more care is taken, and .auxiliary structures are present. One of the simplest of useful developments is exhibited by glands, the viscid secretion of which moors the SEXUAL ORGANS AND TISSUES. 69 ova, and keeps them from being set wholly adrift. In insects, where it is specially important that the eggs should be well con- cealed, or buried in conveniently nutritive material, hints of the ancestral abdominal appendages remain as " ovipositors." Throughout the series a great variety of structures occur in this connection. § 6. Brooding and Young-Feeding Organs. — From very lowly animals onwards, structures are present which are utilised in the protection of the young in their helpless stages. The reproductive buds of some ccelenterates become true nurseries; in one at least of the marine worms (Spirorbis spirillum), a tentacle serves as a brood pouch; various adaptations, such as tents of spines, or cavities in the skin, are utilised in echino- derms. The young shelter under the hard cuticle, or among the appendages of crustaceans, and in the gills of some bivalves. The pockets of not a few fishes, the cavities on the back of the Surinam toad, the pouches of marsupials, are only a few in- stances amid a crowd. Sometimes, especially in fishes and amphibians, — e.g., the sea-horse, with its breast-pouch, and Rhinoderma darwinii, with its enlarged croaking sacs, — it is the male which undertakes the brooding office. When the young are born alive, the internal female ducts become developed in this connection to form uteri. The ovary appears to serve as a womb in the genus Girardinus among fishes, but it is usually the median portion of the female duct which has this function. In placental mammals, where the young are born at an advanced stage, and where the maternal sacrifice is at its maximum, the uterine adaptations become more important and complex. The organs of lactation will be afterwards discussed. In illustration of the strange inter-relations between different forms, we may refer to the fresh-water mussels. The larva? or Glochidia are sheltered and nourished in the outer gill-plates of the female, and are liberated when fishes come near. To the skin of these the larvae fix themselves, become temporarily parasitic, and undergo a metamorphosis, after which they fall off. Without the presence of fishes the life-history cannot be com- pleted. On the other hand, the young stages of the fresh- water fish known as the bitterling {Rhodeus amarus) find temporary shelter in the gills of the mussels. 70 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. SUMMARY. 1. The gradual differentiation of essential sexual organs in animals, — isolated cells, aggregated tissues, definite organs. 2. Associated male and female ducts for the liberation of male-elements, fertilisation, exit of ova, or birth of embryos. 3. Yolk-glands, &c. , for nourishment and equipment of the ova. Vitellaria have been interpreted as degenerate ovaries. 4. Illustrations of organs auxiliary to impregnation. In the male, — penis, storing sacs, spermatophore-making organs, " claspers. " Curiosities, such as the hectocotylus of cuttle-fishes, and the Cupid's dart of snails. Adaptations in the female are less frequent, but storing receptacles for the male-elements are common. 5. Egg-laying organs : — frequency of ovipositors. 6. Brood-pouches and the like are widely present in most classes of animals. LITERATURE. Balfour, F. M. — A Treatise on Comparative Embryology. 2 vols. London, 1881. Bell, F. Jeffrey. — Comparative Anatomy and Physiology. London, 1885. Claus, C. — Elementary Text-Book of Zoology, trans, by A. Sedgwick. 2 vols. London, 1885. Geddes, P. — Op. cit. Gegenbaur, C. — Elements of Comparative Anatomy, trans, by Prof. Jeffrey Bell. London, 1878. Haddon, A. C. — An Introduction to the Study of Embryology. London, 1887. Hensen, Y. — Op. cit. Hertwig, O. — Lehrbuch der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen und der Wirbelthiere. Jena, 1888. Hatch ett Jackson's (W.) Edition of Rolleston's Forms of Animal Life. Oxford, 1888. Huxley, T. H. — Anatomy of Vertebrate and Invertebrate Animals. London, 1871 and 1877. Sachs, J. — Text-Book of Botany, edited by Prof. Vines. Second edition. Oxford, 1882. And similar works. Lectures on the Physiology of Plants, trans, by Prof. Marshall Ward. Cambridge, 1887. Vines, S. H. — Vegetable Reproduction (Ency. Brit.). Lectures on the Physiology of Plants. Cambridge, 1886. Wiedersheim, R. — Elements of the Comparative Anatomy of Verte- brates, trans, by Prof. W. N. Parker. London, 1S97. Also un- abridged work. CHAPTER VI. HERMAPHRODITISM. § i. When an organism combines within itself the production of both male and female elements, it is said to be bisexual or hermaphrodite. This is the case with many of the lower animals, — such, for instance, as earthworms and snails. It is not desirable to extend the term, as is sometimes done, to cases like ciliated infusorians, where sex itself is only incipient. In flowering plants, the stamens and carpels, which produce microspores and macrospores respectively, are often, though inaccurately, called the male and female organs, and when both are present in the same flower the term hermaphrodite is often used. But the flowering plant is a sporophyte with only a vestige of the sexual generation left, and the term hermaphro- dite should be kept for cases like the prothallus of a fern — a sexual generation with male and female organs on the same small expansion. While the general definition of hermaphro- ditism, as the union of the two sexes in one organism, is plain enough, the union is exhibited in a great variety of ways and degrees. Of these it is necessary first to take account. § 2. Embryonic Hermaphroditism. — Some animals are hermaphrodite in their young stages, but unisexual in adult life. Allusion has already been made to the case of tadpoles, where the potential bisexuality occasionally lingers into adult life. According to some, most higher animals pass through a stage of embryonic hermaphroditism, but decisive proof of this is wanting. The research of Laulanie' may now be referred to at greater length. As the result of observations on the development of the reproductive organs in the higher vertebrates, and especially in birds, he seeks to establish a strict parallelism between the individual, and what he believes to have been the racial history. In the chick, he distinguishes three main stages in the development — (i) germiparity, (2) hermaphroditism, (3) differentiated unisexuality. These he regards as recapitulating the great steps of the historic evolution. (1.) For the first period of "germiparity," — from the )2 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. fourth to the sixth day, — the designation, sexual neutrality, or indifference, is inappropriate, since the "cortical ovules" of the germinal epithelium have from the first the precise morphological significance of female ele- ments or ova. In the female, they proceed by multiplication to form the ovary; in the male, they degenerate. (2.) The period of hermaphroditism begins with the seventh day. In the male, the male ovules, from which the sperms are afterwards developed, appear in the central tissue ; but at the same time cortical or female ovules may be seen persisting. Similarly, in the developing ovary of the female, the central or medullary portion, strictly separated by a partition of connective tissue from the egg-forming layer, contains a large number of medullary or male ovules. (3.) This hermaphroditism is of short duration. The cortical or female ovules disappear from the testes by the eighth or ninth day; and the medullary or male ovules have by the tenth day disappeared from the ovary. In regard to mammals, Laulanie affirms, allowing some peculiarities, that the same three stages of germiparity, hermaphroditism, and unisexuality occur. Ploss has already been referred to as another investigator who main- tains the existence of embryonic hermaphroditism. Such also is the view held by Professor Sutton, who concludes that both sets of organs are equally developed up to a definite period, and emphasises the consequent necessity for the hypertrophy of one sexual rudiment over the other. § 3. Casual or Abnormal Hermaphroditism. — In many species which are normally unisexual, a casual hermaphrodite form occasionally presents itself. The embryonic equilibrium or bisexuality — one of the two must in a variable degree exist — is retained as an abnormality into adult life Even as far up in the organic series as birds and mammals, such casual and yet true hermaphrodites occur. In most cases at least the result is sterility. Among amphibians, which abound in reproductive peculiarities, herma- phroditism exceptionally occurs, and in some species of toad it seems to be constant. The common frog, so much dissected in our laboratories, has supplied several good illustrations. Thus Marshall notes that the testes may be associated with genuine ova, or an ovary may occur on one side, and a testis with an anterior ovarian portion upon the other. Bourne gives a case of a frog with the ovary well developed on the right side, and opposite this an ovary anteriorly replaced by testis. One of the toads (Pelobates fuscus) seems to be frequently hermaphrodite, the male being furnished with a rudimentary ovary in front of the testes. A similar hermaphroditism is not at all infrequent in cod, herring, mackerel, and many other fishes. Sometimes a fish is male on one side, female on the other, or male anteriorly and female posteriorly. Sir J. Y. Simpson, in a learned article on the subject, has distinguished cases of true hermaphro- ditism, according to the position of the organs, into lateral, transverse, and vertical or double. Among invertebrates the same has been occasionally observed, especially among butterflies where striking differences in the colouring of the wings on the two sides have in some cases been found to correspond to an internal co-existence of ovary and testis. The same has been observed in a lobster, and is probably commoner than the recorded cases warrant one in asserting. As low down as ccelenterates, casual hermaphroditism may occur, as F. E. Schulze showed in one of the medusoids. § 4. Partial Hermaphroditism. — An organism may be said to be truly hermaphrodite when both male and female organs are present, or when, HERMAPHRODITISM. 73 without there being separate organs, both male and female elements are produced. It is then both anatomically and physiologically hermaphro- dite, and of this, as we shall see, there are abundant illustrations among lower animals. Snail, earthworm, and leech are examples of this herma- phroditism, in varying degrees of intimacy. But, as we have just noticed, a species normally unisexual may occasion- ally exhibit hermaphrodite individuals. In these only one of the double essential organs may be functional, or both may be sterile. Whether physiologically or not, such animals are anatomically hermaphrodite. Both kinds of essential organs are at least present. To those must now be added a further series of cases to which the term partial hermaphroditism seems most applicable. Only one kind of sexual organ, ovary or testis, is developed; but while one sex preponderates, there are more or less emphatic hints of the other. As the reproductive organs are to be regarded as the most important, but not by any means the sole expression of the fundamental sex-differences, it is impossible to separate partial hermaphroditism by any hard and fast line from the above, and from the next set of cases (paragraphs 3 and 5). Almost all cases of partial hermaphroditism occur as exceptions, though a few are constant. In the higher animals, partial hermaphroditism is usually expressed in the nature of the reproductive ducts. In this connection the structural resemblance of the male and female organs must be once more emphasised. Even the Greeks had their vague and fanciful theories of what we now call the homology of the reproductive organs and ducts in the two sexes. Through the labours of the anatomists of Cuvier's school, such as his fellow-worker Geoffrey St Hilaire, and yet more through more recent embryological discoveries, there is now both clearness and certainty as to the main facts. The reproductive organs proper, the ducts, and the external parts, are developed upon the same plan in male and female. Thus, except in the lowest vertebrates, what serves as an oviduct in the female, is equally present in the embryo male, and persists in the adult as a more or less functionless rudiment. In the same way, what serves as the duct for the sperms {vas deferens) in the male is equally present in the embryo female, and persists in the adult as a rudiment, or is diverted to some other purpose. This is a perfectly normal occurrence, dependent upon the embryological history of the ducts in question. It is necessary, however, to realise both the primitive resemblance and the fundamental unity of the two sets of organs, in order to understand how partial herma- phroditism is so frequent, and also to distinguish it from "spurious hermaphroditism," where a merely superficial abnormality or even injury of the ducts in one sex produces a resemblance to those of the other. We have already mentioned that in the case of twin calves, two females may occur, and both are then normal ; or two normal twin calves may be born of opposite sexes ; but, in the third place, if both be males, one of these very generally exhibits the peculiar phenomena of what is called a. "free-martin." In the commonest form of this, partial hermaphroditism is well illustrated. The essential organs are male, but there is a rudi- mentary uterus and vagina, and the external organs are further those of a female. It is necessary to note that a simulation of even this partial hermaphro- ditism may result from malformation or rudimentary development of the external organs. On this subject we may quote an acknowledged autho- 74 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. rity, alike in anatomical and embryological matters. " From the fact," Prof. O. Hertwig remarks, " that the external sexual organs are originally of uniform structure in the two sexes, we can understand the fact that, in a disturbance of the normal development, forms arise in which it is ex- tremely difficult to decide whether we have to deal with male or female external organs. These cases, in earlier times, were falsely interpreted as hermaphroditism. They may have a double origin. Either they are referable to the fact that in the female sex the development may proceed along the same path as in the male, or to this, that in the male the normal development may come at an early age to a standstill, and lead to the formation of structures which resemble the female parts." In the first case, he goes on to say, there may be a simulation of a penis, and the ovaries may even be shifted so as to produce an appearance like that of the testes within their scrotal sac. In the second case, the processes of coalescence which give rise to the penis may not occur, only a rudimentary organ is formed, and there may even be an inhibition of the usual descent of the testes into their sacs. Of this superficial hermaphroditism, really not hermaphroditism at all, there are numerous cases among mammals. But there remain a large number of recorded instances, where the anatomy of the ducts was pre- dominantly that of the sex opposite to that indicated by the essential organs, and where the combination of the two sexes was also expressed in external configuration and even in habit. Amphibians again furnish some interesting examples. Attached to the anterior end of the testis in various species of toad (Bufo), there is an organ known as " Bidder's," which has contents like young ova. These do not, however, get past the early stages, and the organ is quite different from the more than rudimentary ovary which occurs constantly in the males of Bufo cinereus and some other species. The two may in fact occur together. In the common frog, dissectors have also recorded seveial cases of hermaphroditism expressed in the ducts. Lastly, it is perhaps not going too far to include here some reference to the curious " fatty bodies" which occur in all amphibians at the apex of the reproductive organs in both sexes. These appear to nourish the ovary and testis, especially during hybernation, and may perhaps be associated with similar lymphoid structures in fishes and reptiles. Prof. Milnes Marshall demonstrated that the fatty bodies result from the degeneration of the anterior part of the reproductive organ while still in an indifferent state. Leaving the ducts out of account, we may arrange the important phenomena of hermaphroditism in amphidians in a series as follows : — • (a) Embryonic hermaphroditism, demonstrated as of normal occurrence in frog tadpoles. (6) Casual hermaphroditism, demonstrated in frogs, e.g. in the occur- rence of distinct ova in the seminiferous tubules of Rana viridis as reported by F. Friedmann (Arch. Mikr. Anat., Hi. (1898), pp. 248-262, 1 pi. expressed in Bidder's organ in male toads ; (c) Partial hermaphroditism, - (also expressed in various states of the , ducts). (d) Normal adult hermaphroditism, in some species of Bufo. HERMAPHRODITISM. 75 The list need not be further followed; it is enough to note the very wide occurrence of partial hermaphroditism. In many cases, moreover, we find what may be called superficial her- maphroditism, expressing itself in the external characters. Forms occur in which the minor peculiarities of the two sexes- colouring, decorations, weapons, and the like — appear blended together, or in which the secondary sexual characters are at variance with the internal organs. In most cases, one is safe in saying that there is no true internal hermaphroditism in any degree. Arrest of maturity or puberty, cessation of the repro- ductive functions, removal or disease of the essential organs, and the like, may alter the secondary sexual characters from female towards male, or, less frequently, vice versa. A female deer may develop a horn, or a hen a spur, and in such cases the ovaries are generally found to be diseased. The prettiest cases of superficial hermaphroditism occur among insects, especially among moths and butterflies, where it often happens that the wings on one side are those of the male, on the other those of the female. Only the external features have been observed in most cases; but it has been shown by dissection that such superficial blending may exist along with internal unisexuality, or, in a few cases, with genuine internal her- maphroditism. A beautiful case of intimate blending of superficial sex characters was lately shown to us by Mr W. de V. Kane of Kingstown. A specimen of butterfly (Euchloe euphenoides) showed the anterior half of the fore wings and part of the hind wings with the characteristic white ground of the female, while in the posterior half of the fore wings and on most of the hind wings the characteristic sulphur of the male prevailed. In other minor ways, the characteristics of the two sexes, which are well marked, were intimately blended. In all such cases we may suppose that the imperfection of the normal unisexual differentiation removes the usual limits to the appearance of this or that secondary sexual character. § 5. Normal Adult Hermaphroditism— This is rare among the higher animals, but common among the lower. On the threshold of the vertebrate series, we find it indeed constant among the Tunicata; but above these it is very rare. The hag {Myxine) was shown by Cunningham, and afterwards by Nansen, to be a protandrous hermaphrodite, but this conclusion is contested by Bashford Dean ("Festschrift Kupffer," 1899). "A testis is constantly found imbedded in the wall of the l6 THE EVOLUTION OF S£X. ovary in Chrysophrys and Serranus, and the last-named fish is said to be self-impregnating." In some species of male toad {e.g., Bufo cinereus) a somewhat rudimentary ovary is always present in front of the testes. All other cases among verte- brates are either casual (par. 3) or partial (par. 4). Among invertebrates, true hermaphroditism is frequent. (1.) Sponges. — As already mentioned, the sex-cells of sponges arise among the components of the middle layer (mesoglozd) of the body. It is at least possible that in any sponge they may develop either into ova or into sperms, or into both, within the same organism, according to nutritive and other conditions. The facts, however, are these. Many sponges are only known in a unisexual state, while others are genuinely hermaphrodite. But among the latter it is not uncommon to find (e.g., in Sycandra raphanus) that the production of one set of elements preponderates over the other, and thus we have hermaphrodites with a distinctly male or female bias. In other words, they are verging towards unisexuality. It does happen in fact (e.g., in Oscarella lobularis) that a species normally hermaphrodite may exhibit unisexual forms. (2.) Coelenterates. — The members of this class are higher, in having the production of the sex-cells more restricted, to definite regions, tissues, organs, or even " persons." The highly active Ctenophores, like Berbe, are all hermaphrodite, and that very closely. On one side of the meri- dional branches of the alimentary canal ova arise, on the other side sperma- tozoa. Among sea-anemones and corals the hermaphrodite condition appears in a number of cases, but is sometimes obscured by the fact that the two kinds of elements are produced at different times, corresponding to different physiological rhythms in the life of the organism. The genus Corallium (the red coral of commerce) is peculiarly instructive. The whole colony may be unisexual, or one branch of the colony, or only certain individuals on a branch, while genuine hermaphroditism of individual polyps also occurs. Among hydrozoa (zoophytes, swimming-bells, jelly- fish), hermaphroditism is a rare exception. The common hydra, which is a somewhat degenerate type, is hermaphrodite, though at the same time individuals may be found with only ovary or only testes. Eleittheria is also hermaphrodite, and abortive ova occur in the male of Gonothyrea loveni. Sometimes a colony is hermaphrodite (Dicoryne), but the stems and individuals unisexual. Sometimes a stem is hermaphrodite, but the individuals unisexual (certain sertularians). Among jelly-fishes the genus Chrysaora is known to be hermaphrodite. (3.) " Worms." — The condition of the sexual organs varies enormously among the diverse types lumped together under the title of "worms "or "Vermes." In the lowly turbellarians, all the genera are hermaphrodite except two, but, as in many other cases, the organs do not reach maturity at the same time, the male preceding. In the related trematodes or flukes, hermaphroditism again obtains, with one exception, or perhaps two. The certain exception is the curious parasite Bilharzia, where the male carries the female about with him in a " gynsecophoric canal," formed of folds of skin. In the adjacent class of cestodes or tapeworms, all the members are hermaphrodite, with one alleged exception. The utility of the herma- phrodite state, if the eggs of these parasitic animals are to be fertilised and HERMAPHRODITISM. 77 the species maintained, can hardly be doubted. It is important to notice too, that self-fertilisation — that is, union of the eggs and sperms of the same organism — has been proved to occur in several trematodes, and seems to be almost universal in cestodes. This may be partly a cause and partly a consequence of the degeneracy of these parasites, for frequent as herma- phroditism is among plants and animals, self-fertilisation is extremely rare. Hermaphroditism is rare among the free-living nemerteans, but con- stant in the semi-parasitic leeches. An exception to separateness of the sexes among threadworms or nematodes is found in the curious genus Angiostomum. Here, in an organism which is anatomically a female, the reproductive organ begins its activity by pro- ducing spermatozoa, which fertilise the subse- quent ova. The animal is thus physiologically hermaphrodite, and at the same time self- impregnating. Approaching the higher anne- lid worms, we find the primitive Protodrilus hermaphrodite; the earthworms are constantly so, but all their marine relatives have the sexes separate. The genus Sagitta, which stands by , itself, is hermaphrodite ; the same condition is known as a rarity among the ancient brachio- pods (Lingula), but is frequent among the colonial Polyzoa. Many, at least, of the My- zostomata — aberrant parasites of Crinoids — are hermaphrodite. (4.) Echinoderma. — Almost all the mem- bers of this class have separate sexes. Among the few exceptions are the species of Synapta (a divergent Holothuroid), a sand-star (Amphi- ura squamata), and a starfish (Asterina gib- bosa). The last is particularly interesting. At RoscofT, the individuals are males for one or two years, and then become females; at Ban- yuls, the individuals are males for at least two or three years, but eventually become females ; at Naples some are wholly male, others wholly female, others hermaphrodite imparti- ally, others transitional. (See L. Cuenot, Zool. Anzeiger, XXI., 1898, pp. 273-279, 3 (5.) Arthropods.— Among crustaceans, hermaphroditism is a rare ^ex- ception, though it occurs in the majority of the fixed quiescent acorn-shells and barnacles (Cirripedia). There it is associated with the presence of small males, which Darwin called "complemental." The Cymothoida: (Isopods) show a curious condition somewhat like that of Angiostomum above noticed. The sexual organ of the young animal is male, of the old, female in function. In such cases, one must remember the antithesis between the body proper and the reproductive cells. In youth the demands of the body during growth are greater; there is no anabolic surplus to spare, all goes to increase the body. When mature size is reached and growth and activities are lessened, there is more likelihood of anabolic preponderance in the reproductive, as opposed to the vegetative, system. Bilharzia, a parasitic trematode, in which the male carries the female in a special fold of skin called the " gynascophorLc canal." — After Leuckart. 78 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. Myriopods and insects have always separate sexes, excluding of course abnormal hermaphroditism among the latter. (6.) Molluscs. — Most bivalves are of separate sexes, but exceptions often occur — e.g., in common species of oyster, cockle, clam, &c. In the case of the oyster, the familiar species (Ostrea edulis) is hermaphrodite, and a neighbouring species apparently unisexual. In both cases the organs are the same, but in 0. edulis the same intimate recesses of the reproduc- tive organ produce at one time ova, at another time sperms. The snails, or gasteropods, are divided into two great groups, according to the twisting of their nerves. The one group (Streptoneura) have the sexes separate; the members of the other series (Euthyneura) are her- maphrodite. The sea-butterflies, or pleropods, are hermaphrodite, but the elephant's tooth shells (Scaphopods) are unisexual. So in cuttle-fishes (Cephalo- pods), the sexes are separate. In the limpet (Patella) hermaphroditism occurs as a casual variation, 3 out of 250. The low-level limpets, which are probably better fed, show no preponderance of females, but it may be noted that the female repro- ductive organ of the limpet is not larger than the male organ, and does not therefore make special demands on nutrition. (See J. F. Gemmill, Anat. Anzeiger, XII., 1896, pp. 393, 394.) § 6. Degrees of Normal Hermaphroditism. — From what has been already said, it is evident that hermaphroditism may be more or less intimate. Thus the red coral is sometimes female as regards one branch, and male as regards another; a leech has the ovaries far forward, and independent of the long row of testes ; in a tunicate the testes and ovary may form one mass, the male cells spreading over the surface of the ovary. In the same way, the organ of a scallop, which exhibits more or less distinct male and female portions, is in a state of less intimate anatomical hermaphroditism than the oyster, where the same caeca of the same organ fulfil both functions at different times. This last caution must be kept in view, for there is through- out, in varying degrees, a tendency to periodicity in the production of male and female elements. Such a want of "time-keeping" between the sexes is called dichogamy, and is one of the conditions which render self-fertilisation rarely possible. The male function has in the majority of cases the precedence. Similarly in flowering plants, although it is not quite accurate to call the stamens the male organs, or the carpels the female organs, it may be said that " protandrous dichogamy" (stamens taking the lead) is very much commoner than "protogynous dichogamy," where the carpels are first matured. This agrees with the curious cases of Angiostomum HERMAPHRODITISM. 79 and Cymothoidse already mentioned, where the organ was first male and then female, and indeed with at least most cases among closely hermaphrodite animals. Where the male organs are situated in one part of the body, and the female in another, there is less reason against the production of sperms going on at the same time as the production of ova. In terms of our general thesis, protogyny corresponds, like unisexual female- ness, to a relative predominance of anabolism in the life-ratio, and protandry with the reverse. The common snail {Helix) is not only easily dissected, but in the complexity of its arrangements is full of interest. Here, not only are ova and sperms produced within the compass of one small organ, but each little corner of the organ shows female cells forming on the walls and male cells in the centre. It has been suggested by Platner that the outer cells are the better nourished; they therefore naturally become developed into anabolic ova. In the large slug, Limax maximus, Babor found a succession of sexual states, — female, hermaphrodite, male, hermaphrodite, female; and suggests that the same alternation may be observed elsewhere. (Verh. Zool.-bot. Ges. Wien, xlviii., 1898, pp. 151-153-) § 7. Self-Fertilisation. — We have noted above, that though male and female organs be present in the same organism, they tend to become mature at different times, and that the more the closer the seats of formation of the two kinds of elements. It is equally necessary to emphasise that, though both male and female elements may be produced in the same plant or animal, it is probably exceptional for the ovule to be penetrated by a pollen cell from the same flower, and it is certainly rare for an animal to fertilise its own ova. It is believed by breeders of higher animals that "close- breeding " beyond a certain point is dangerous to the welfare of the stock. The offspring tend to be abnormal or unhealthy. In view of this, the rarity of self-fertilisation among herma- phrodites has been explained in terms of the disadvantage of the process. In reality, however, this is putting the cart before the horse. In hermaphrodites, we take it that the two kinds of sexual elements mature and are liberated at different times, not because of any reaction of the disadvantageousness of self- fertilisation on the health of the species, but simply because the simultaneous co-existence of opposite physiological processes is in varying degrees prohibited. More technically, dichogamy is 8o THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. not a secondary result of the disadvantage of self-fertilisation nor of the advantage of cross-fertilisation, but increasing dicho- gamy is the primary condition of cross-fertilisation. Self-fertilisation does, however, occur as an exception among animals, — thus in all probability in the interesting fish Ser- ranus; certainly in many parasitic flukes or trematodes; com- monly, if not almost always, in tape-worms or cestodes; also in the curious thread-worm Angiostomum, and probably in ctenophores, and in some other cases. In regard to some cases, e.g., among hermaphrodite bivalves (where the sperms are usually wafted in with the water), it is impossible as yet to say whether self-impregnation does or does not occur. Arguing from the bad effects of close breeding among higher animals, Darwin and others have called attention to the numerous contrivances among plants which are said to render self-pollination impossible. In some cases the pollen of a given flower is quite inoperative on the ovule of the same flower, or has the result of producing weakly offspring. There are also many mechanical devices, as the result of which it is difficult or impossible for the pollen of the stamens to reach the stigmas of the flower, or even to be dusted upon them by the unconscious agency of the intruding insects. Moreover, as among animals, so among plants, it is common for the stamens to become mature before the carpels are ready, or, in rarer cases, for the reverse to occur. There is no doubt that cross-fertilisation very generally occurs, and it is physiologically probable that this is a con- siderable advantage, though probably less among plants than among animals. But there is an increasing impression that both the occurrence of cross-fertilisation, and the necessity of it among higher plants, have been exaggerated. One of the most thoughtful and observant of American botanists, Mr T. Meehan, has raised a vigorous protest against the prevalent view. In the Yucca, or Adam's needle, which is regarded as cross-fertilised by insects, he showed by experiment that there was in each flower " no abhorrence of its own pollen." " Even when fertilised at all by insects, I am sure the fertilisation is from the pollen of the same flower." Then as to mechanical contrivances, he says, '' we are told that iris, campanula, dandelion, ox-eye daisy, the garden pea, lobelia, clover, and many others, are so arranged that they cannot fertilise themselves without insect aid. I have enclosed HERMAPHRODITISM. flowers of all those named in fine gauze bags, and they produced seeds just as well as those exposed." We cannot here enter into a full statement of Meehan's careful observations, but his three main propositions well deserve statement and due consideration: — i. Cross-fertilisation by insect agency does not exist nearly to the extent claimed for it. Mvzostomata:-(i) A hermaphrodite bearing pigmy males (X); (2) a pigmy male.- J ' From Nansen. 2 Where it does exist, there is no evidence that it is of any material benefit to the race, but to the contrary. ■x Difficulties in self-fertilisation result from physiological disturbances that have no relation to the general welfare of plants as species. , 82 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. § 8. Complemental Males. — When Mr Darwin was inves- tigating barnacles and acorn shells, in preparation for his monograph on the group, he discovered the remarkable fact that some of the hermaphrodite individuals carried minute males concealed under their shells. These he regarded as advantageous accessory forms, ensuring cross-fertilisation in the hermaphrodites which harbour them. The great majority of the cirripedes are hermaphrodite; but among the barnacles proper, — the stalked forms, which are nearer the ancestral type, • ■ — separate sexes sometimes occur. On the females of a few of these, pigmy males, like those found upon hermaphrodites, also occur. These pigmy males, whether on females or herma- phrodites, are not only dwarfish, but are very often degenerate, sometimes wanting (according to Darwin) both alimentary canal and thoracic legs. Some of them, in fact, are little more than parasitic testes. The various steps in the evolution may be hypothetically sketched: — (a) The original state of affairs was probably the ordinary crustacean condition of separate sexes, (b) A second stage may have been repre- sented by a diminution in the size of the males, as in some of the "water- fleas" or copepods, while the females became more and more sluggish, and settled down, (c) In the genera Akippe and Cryptophiahis, in the species Ibla cummingii and Scalpellum ornatum, there are true females, with attached pigmy males, often several, leading a shabby existence as parasites. {d) In other species of Scalpellin?i and Ibla the same pigmy males occur, but attached, as we have noted, to hermaphrodites, which in these forms have replaced the true females, (e) Lastly, in many genera, like Pollicipes, only hermaphrodites occur. In a description of the complementary male of Scalpellum vul^are, A. Gruvel notes ("Archives de Biologie," xvi., 1899, pp. 27-47, ' P'-) tnat it in many respects follows the hermaphrodite form, but is greatly simplified, e.g. , in the absence of alimentary canal and of specialised vascular and respiratory organs. He suggests that as the spermatozoa of the hermaphro- dite form ripen before the eggs, some of the belated eggs may be fertilised by the spermatozoa of the complementary male which is later in attaining maturity. He supposes further that these belated eggs give rise to the next brood of complementary males. But this, as is the case with so many of these speculations, awaits experimental verification. What Darwin did for the cirripedes, Graff and others have done for another very curious set of animals, the Myzostomata. These are degene- rate chtetopods or bristle-footed worms, which occur as outside parasites on sea-lilies (crinoids), on the arms of which they make curious galls. There is unfortunately lack of agreement among observers, and the life-history of these curious forms requires further study. We can only indicate two different sets of results. According to Beard, "the various kinds of parasitism presented by the HERMAPHRODITISM. 83 numerous species of Myzostoma have led in some cases to the preservation of males, in others to their extinction, in yet others to their conversion into hermaphrodites." He distinguishes — 1. Purely dicecious forms with small males, e.g. M. pulvinar. 2. Hermaphrodite forms and true males, which remain as dwarf " complemental males" on the back of the hermaphrodites, e.g. M. glabrum. 3. Hermaphrodite forms and males, which, retaining their position on the back of the others, afterwards become females, e.g. M. alatum. 4. Hermaphrodite forms, in which the males have lost their dorsal position, and have either become extinct or converted into pro- tandric hermaphrodites, e.g. M. cirriferum. According to Wheeler, Myzostoma glabrum is from the first herma- phrodite and not dimorphic, but a functional male phase is succeeded by a functional hermaphrodite phase, and that again by a functional female phase during which the testes disappear. " The cysticolous and endoparasitic species of the genus tend towards a condition in which the functional male and female phases overlap but little, thus exhibiting only a brief hermaphrodite phase (M. eremila), or these phases no longer overlap and thus present two well-marked periods of sexual maturity, one male and the other female (M. pulvinar)." § 9. Conditions of Hermaphroditism. — A review of the occurrence of normal hermaphroditism suggests few general conclusions. Claus points out that hermaphroditism finds most abundant expression in sluggish and fixed animals. Flukes, tapeworms, leeches, even earthworms and land-snails, may illustrate the sluggard hermaphrodites; among sponges, sea-anemones, corals, Polyzoa, bivalves, &c, we find frequent illustration of the association of fixedness and hermaphroditism. Most of the tunicates are also fixed, and all are hermaphrodite. But the pelagic tunicates are also hermaphrodite, and so are the very active Ctenophora. Claus notes further that in flukes and tapeworms hermaphroditism is associated with an isolated habit of life. But there is often anything but isolation, for flukes may occur near one another in great numbers; and as many as ninety tapeworms (Bothriocephalus) have been known to occur at one time in a single host. Simon has gone further, in insisting on the physiological connection between quiescent and parasitic habit and the hermaphrodite condition. In flukes and tapeworms, leeches, Myzostomata, and some cirripedes, we find the association of hermaphroditism with a more or less intimate parasitic habit. But what Simon points out is, that organisms on which great demands are made, especially in the way of muscular exertion, 84 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. cannot afford to be hermaphrodite; while a plethora of nutrition, as in parasitism, tends to make the persistence of the double state possible. He gives numerous illustrations in support of this view. Others are content to interpret the hermaphroditism in all these cases as an adaptation to ensure fertilisation, for the possibilities of pairing between separate sexes are certainly lessened if the animals are sluggish, sedentary, or parasitic. § 10. Origin of Hermaphroditism. — (1) One view of the matter is that hermaphroditism was the primitive state among multicellular animals, at least after the differentiation of sex- elements had been accomplished. In alternating rhythms, eggs and sperms were produced. The organism was alternately male and female. Of this primitive hermaphroditism, there may be more or less of a recapitulation in the life-history of the organism. Gegenbaur states the common opinion in the following cautious and terse words : — " The hermaphrodite stage is the lower, and the condition of distinct sexes has been derived from it." Unisexual "differentiation, by the reduction of one kind of sexual apparatus, takes place at very different stages in the development of the organism, and often when the sexual organs have attained a very high degree of differentiation." The first structural stage in the separation would probably be the restriction of areas, in which the forma- tion of two kinds of cells still went on at different times in one organism. In different individuals the opposite tendencies we have already spoken of more and more predominated, till unisexuality evolved out of hermaphroditism. That environmental conditions are effective in changing the hermaphrodite into the unisexual state is suggeste'd by many experiments. And it has been shown in regard to some flowering plants, e.g. butcher's broom (Ruscus aculeatus), that the monoecious or dioecious condition may be evoked by alter- ing the nutritive conditions. (2) Quite different is the view which regards hermaphro- ditism as a secondary condition, derived from primitive uni- sexuality. Thus Pelseneer maintains that the " study of Mollusca, Myzostomidag, Crustacea, and Pisces shows that in these groups the separation of the sexes preceded herma- phroditism; various cases in other, groups tend to show that this is true universally; and the same conclusion applies to plants. In Mollusca, Crustacea, and Pisces, at least, herma- phroditism is grafted upon the female sex." HERMAPHRODITISM. 85 SUMMARY. 1. Hermaphroditism is the union of the two sexual functions in one organism. This occurs, however, in varying degrees. 2. Embryonic hermaphroditism is probably a general fact with even unisexual animals. It is certain in some cases. 3. Casual or abnormal hermaphroditism is not infrequent. 4. Partial hermaphroditism (not involving the essential organs) is exceedingly common. 5. Normal adult hermaphroditism ; review of its occurrence. 6. True hermaphroditism occurs in many degrees of intimacy. 7. Self-fertilisation is a rare exception among animals; commoner in plants. 8. " Complemental males" — pigmies attached to hermaphrodites — occur in two groups. 9. The conditions of hermaphroditism. Commonest in sedentary, sluggish, parasitic forms. 10. Hermaphroditism is primitive ; the unisexual state is a subsequent differentiation. Or, Unisexuality is primitive; the hermaphrodite state secondary. Possibly both suggestions may be true. LITERATURE. See already cited works of Gegenbaur, Hensen, Hertwig, Hatchett Jackson and Rolleston, passim. Beard, J. — The Sexual Conditions of Myzostoma glabrum. MT. Zool. Slat. Neapel., XIII., 1898, pp. 293-324, I pi. Bourne. — On Certain Abnormalities in the Common Frog. 1. The Occurrence of an Ovotestis. Quart. J. Micr. Sc, XXIV. Brock. — Morph. Jahrb., IV. Beitrage zur Anatomie und Histologic der Geschlechtsorgane der Knochenfische. Giles. — Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. 1888. Haacke, W. — Die Bedeutung und die Folgen der Inzestzucht. Biol. Centrlbl., XV., 1895, pp. 44-78. Kennel, J.— Schrift. Nat. Ges. Jurjeff (Dorpat), IX., 1896, pp. 1-64. Laulanik, F. — Comptes Rendus, CI. (1885), pp. 393-5. Marshall, A. Milnes. — On Certain Abnormal Conditions of the Reproductive Organs in the Frog. Journ. Anat. Physiol., XVIII., pp. 121-44. Meehan, T.— On Self-Fertilisation and Cross-Fertilisation in Flowers. Penn. Monthly, VII. (1876), pp. 834-43. Montgomery, T. H.— On Successive Protandric and Proterogynic Her- maphroditism in Animals. Amer. Naturalist, XXIX., 1895, pp. 528-36. Pelseneer, P.— L'hermaphroditisme chez les Mollusques. Arch. Biol., 1895, pp. 33-62, 2 pis. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., CXLV., 1894, pp. 19-46, 2 pis. 86 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. Pfluger, E. — Archiv. ges. Physiol., XXIX. Prouho, H.— Dioicite et Hermaphroditisme chez les Myzostomes. Zool. Anzeiger, XVIII., 1895, pp. 392-5. Simtson, J. Y. — Todd's Cyclopaedia of Anatomy and Physiology. Art. Hermaphroditism, pp. 684-738 (1836-9). Spengel.— Arb. Wiirzburg, III., 1876. Ueber d. Urogenital System der Amphibien. Zwitterbildung bei Amphibien. Biol. Centrlbl., IV., 8. cf. 9. Sutton, J. B. — Hypertrophy and its Value in Evolution. Proc. Zool. Soc, London, 1888, pp. 432. > General Pathology. London, 1886. Wheeler, W. M.— The Sexual Phases of Myzostoma. MT. Zool. Stat. Neapel., XII., 1896, pp. 227-302. Zool. Anzeig., XXII. (1S9?), pp. 281-8. CHAPTER VII. The Ultimate Sex-Elements {General and HisloricaT). In our analysis of sex-characters we have followed the general course of biological history. We first passed from the form and habit of a male or female organism to the structure and functions of the sexual organs. In discussing hermaphroditism, we had occasion to refer to a third step of biological analysis, that which involves an investigation of the properties of the Mammalian ovum, showing nucleolus (a), nucleus (J) cytoplasm (c) external porous zone or zona pellucida (J), and follicular cells W. —From Hertwig, after Waldeyer. tissues. Now it is necessary to penetrate deeper, namely, to the sex-cells. After these have been considered we shall be in a better position to re-ascend to some of the problems of reproduction. 88 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. § i. The Ovum Theory.— -It is now a commonplace of" observation and established fact, that all organisms, reproduced in the ordinary way, start in life as single cells. We see insects laying their ova upon plants, or fishes shedding them in the water, and may watch how these cells, provided they be fertilised, give rise eventually to. the adult organisms. Con- veniently in the ordinary frog-spawn from the ditch, we can read, what was for so long a riddle, how development proceeds by successive cell-divisions and by arrangement of the multiple results. Readily seen in many instances, it is true of all cases of ordinary sexual reproduction, that the organism starts from the union of two sex-cells. In other words, it is with the division of a fertilised ovum that development begins. This profound fact, technically known as the "ovum theory," has been not unjustly called by Agassiz " the greatest discovery in the natural sciences of modern times." We shall the better realise the magnitude of the difference which its recognition has introduced into biology, if we briefly review the history. § 2. The History of Embryology: Evolution and Epigenesis. — The development of the chick, so much studied in em- bryological laboratories to-day, was the subject of inquiry two thousand years ago in Greece. Some of the conspicuous marvels of reproduction and development were the subjects of persistent but fruitless speculation throughout many centuries. It was only during the scientific renaissance of the seventeenth century that the inquiry became more keen and precise, and began to rely to some extent at least on genuine observation. (a) Harvey (165 1), with the aid of magnifying glasses {perspediia), demonstrated in the fowl's egg the connection between the cicatricula of the yolk and the rudiments of the chick, and also observed some of the stages of uterine life in mammals. More important, however, were his far- sighted general conclusions, — (1.) That every animal was pro- duced from an ovum {ovum esse primordium commune omnibus animalibus); and (2.) That the organs arose by new formation {epigenesis), not from the mere expansion of some invisible pre- formation. In this generalisation, without however any abandon- ment of the hypothesis of spontaneous generation of germs, he strove, as he said, to follow his master Aristotle, and was in so doing as far ahead of his contemporaries as a strong genius usually is. Before Harvey, the observational method had THE ULTIMATE SEX-ELEMENTS. 89 indeed begun. Thus, as Allen Thomson notes, Volcher Coiter of Groningen (1573), along with Aldrovandus of Bologna, had watched the incubated egg in its marvellous progress from day to day. Fabricius ab Aquapendente (1621) had also studied the changes in the incubated egg, and the stages of the mammalian foetus. In keenness of vision, Harvey was far ahead of these. (b) Malpighi (1672), using a microscope with phenomenal skill, traced the embryo back into the recesses of the cicatricula or rudiment, but again missed a magnificent discover)', and supposed the rudiments to have pre-existed in the egg. In 1677, Leeuwenhock was led by Hamm to the discovery of the spermatozoa; and this was followed up, though not to much profit, by Vallisneri and others. Steno, too, in 1664, had given the ovary its present designation ; and De Graaf had interpreted the vesicles of this organ, which now bear his name, as for the most part equivalent to the ova which he had dis- covered in the oviduct. Needham (1667), Swammerdam (1685), and J. van Heme, also contributed items of information not then appreciated in their real relations. (c) The Theory of Preformation — Ovists and Animalculists. — In the early part of the eighteenth century, the embryological observations of investigators, e.g. Boerhaave, were summed up in the conception that development was merely an expansion or unfolding of a pre-existent or preformed rudiment within the egg. Harvey had indeed striven for an opposite conclusion, but his view was negatived, as we have seen, by Malpighi's failure to trace the embryo beyond the rudiments of the cicatricula. The notion of a preformed rudiment, thus suggested by Boerhaave, Malpighi, and others, rapidly became the prevalent theory. In so far as it emphasises one side of the facts, it is bound in modified form so to remain. Leibnitz, Malebranche, and others found it to fit in better with their cosmic concep- tions than the older view of Aristotle had done, and welcomed it accordingly. The positions occupied by the physiologist Haller well illustrate the alterations of opinion. As Allen Thomson points out in his article "Embryology," in the Encyclopedia Britantiica, "Haller was originally educated as a believer in the doctrine of ' preformation ' by his teacher Boerhaave, but was soon led to abandon that view in favour of ' epigenesis ' or 9° THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. new formation. But some years later, and after having been engaged in observing the phenomena of development in the incubated egg, he again changed his views, and during the remainder of his life was a keen opponent of the system of epigenesis, and a defender and exponent of the theory of ' evolution,' as it was then named." The preformation theory found more and more definite expression in the works of Bonnet, Buffon, and others. It is now necessary to sum up its main propositions. The germ, whether egg-cell or seed, was believed to be a miniature model of the adult. "Preformed" in all trans parency the organism lay within the egg, only requiring to be unfolded. Many affirmed, that before fertilisation there lay within the fowl's ovum an excessively minute but complete chick. They compared the germ to a complex bud, which hides within its hull the floral organs of the future. Harvey had said, "the first concrement of the futute body grows, gradually divides, and is distinguished into parts ; not all at once, but some produced after the others, each emerging in its order." Very different was Haller's first and last utterance, " There is no becoming ; no part of the body is made from another, all are created at once." This was obviously a short and easy method with embryology, if the organism was literally preformed in the germ, and its development simply a growth and an unfolding. But this was not all. The germ was more than a marvellous bud-like miniature of the adult, it necessarily included in its turn the next generation, and this the next — in short all future generations. Germ within germ, in ever smaller miniature, after the fashion of an infinite juggler's - box, was the corollary logically appended to this theory of preformation and unfold- ing, — of evolution, as it was then called, in a very different but more literal sense from that in which we now use the word. A side controversy of the time arose between two schools, who called each other "ovists" and " animalculists." The former maintained that the female germ element was the more important, and only required to be as it were awakened by the male element to begin the process of unfolding. The animal- culists, on the other hand, asserted the claims of the sperm to be the bearer of the miniature nest of organism within organism, and supposed that it only required to be fed by the ovum to enlarge and unfold the first of the models which it concealed. THE ULTIMATE SEX-ELEMENTS. 91 (d) Wolff's Reassertion of Epigenesis. — The above ingenious construction was rudely shaken down, however, in 1759, when Caspar Friedrich Wolff showed, in his doctorial dissertation, the illegitimacy of the suppositions which lay at the root of the The first stages of development in a number of animals. A , Sponge Coral, Earthworm, or Starfish; B, Crayfish or other Arthropod ; C, Tunicate, Lancelet, &c. ; D, Frog or other Amphibian. 1 Fertilised ovum ; 2. Seemented ovum, a ball of cells, morula, or blastosphere ; 3. The same, after further division or in section ; 4. The gastrula stage. preformation theory. He traced the chick back to a layer of organised particles (the familiar cells of to-day), in which there was no likeness of the future embryo, far less adult. Mors Q2 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. than that, he followed the disposition of these primitive elements to the upbuilding of some of the important organs. He un- doubtedly reacted too far in his emphasis on the entire sim- plicity of the germ, and many of his details were mistaken ; but none the less did he recall embryologists from speculation to take the facts as they found them, and lay the foundation of modern embryology in the fact that there is an observable process of de- velopment from the apparently simple to the obviously complex. (e) Wolff's Successors. — The important conclusion reached by Wolff remained for about sixty years without effect. In 1817, Christian Pander took up embryological research exactly where AVolff had left it, and worked out the history of the chick in more exact detail. In 1824, Prevost and Dumas noticed the division of the ovum into masses ; and in the following year Purkinje discovered the nucleus or "germinal vesicle." Von Baer followed up his friend Pander's work, and in 1827 made the memorable discovery of the mammalian ovum, which he traced from uterus to oviduct, and then to its position in the ovary itself. Thus, after a century and a half, De Graaf's endeavour was at length fulfilled. Soon afterwards, Wagner, von Siebold, and others, elucidated what was still hidden from von Baer, — the real nature of the spermatozoa. Meanwhile, Bichat's analysis (1801) of the organism into tissues, was with improved appliances deepened in the casual description of "cells"; and an important generalisation had its forecast in 1835, when Johannes Miiller pointed out in the vertebrate notochord the existence of cells resembling those of plants. §3. The Cell-Theory. — Without continuing the history further, we must simply note that in 1838 Schleiden referred all vegetable tissues to the cellular type, and traced back the plant embryo to a single nucleated cell ; while, in the following year, Schwann boldly extended this conception of plant struc- ture and development to the animal world, and so fully consti- tuted the "cell-theory." The ovum, recognised as a cell, became a "primordium commune" in a deeper sense than Harvey dreamt of; the masses described by Prevost and Dumas were seen as the products of cell division; and Kolliker led the way, now so well followed up, in tracing these cells to their results in the tissues of the organism § 4. Protoplast7iic Basis. — Only one step further is it possible for biological analysis to penetrate, and that within the last few years is being persistently essayed. It is impossible to rest at THE ULTIMATE SEX-ELEMENTS. 93 the cell-theory level. To recognise the ovum as a cell, and the spermatozoon as another, to find the starting-point of the organism in the double unity formed from these two, to demon- strate the process of development as one of cell multiplication and arrangement, express great but not final biological facts. Thus it is'that of late years, what Michael Foster has called the "protoplasmic movement" has made itself felt, not only in study of the general functions of the body, but in the special physiology of the reproductive cells and their history. Even in morphological or structural studies, attention has shifted from the shapes of cells to the structure of their living matter, or from the different forms of ovum and spermatozoon to the germinal protoplasm or Keimplasma which they contain. On A ^V" /_ — — _\ B ■*- ^l *s Diagram of Protoplasmic Changes. this level, in fact where biology B in plan, A in elevation. m tact wnere oioiogy has touched the bottom, morphology and physiology have become more than ever inseparable. All the facts of structure on the one hand, and of function on the other, have both to be interpreted in terms of the constructive and disruptive changes in the living matter itself. The general theory may be summarised in the accom- panying diagram. Protoplasm is regarded as an exceedingly complex and unstable compound, undergoing continual mole- 94 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. cular change or metabolism. On the one hand, more or less simple dead matter or food passes into life by a series of assimilative ascending changes, with each of which it becomes molecularly more complex and unstable. On the other hand, the resulting protoplasm is continually breaking down into more and more simple compounds, and finally into waste products. The ascending, synthetic, constructive series of changes are termed "anabolic"; and the descending, disruptive series, "kata- bolic." Both processes may be manifold, and the predominance of a particular series of anabolic or katabolic changes implies the specialisation of the cell. issB ' \ Proterospongia, a colonial infusorian, showing the difference between outer and inner cells. — From Saville Kent. The figure (a, on p. 93) represents the complex unstable protoplasm as if occupying the summit of a double flight of steps ; it is formed up the anabolic steps, it breaks up and descends by the katabolic. The lower figure (b) is a projection of the other, its convergent and divergent lines serving to represent the various special lines of anabolism and katabolism respectively, and the definite component substances ("anastates" and "katastates") which it is the task of the chemical physiologist to isolate and interpret. From a general physiological point of view it matters little if we make a slightly different assumption, namely, that protoplasm does not exactly share in the twofold process of metabolism, but is a substance per se, acting, like a ferment, on the complex materials around it. Even if we suppose, as some do, that there is no such substance as protoplasm, life being the THE ULTIMATE SEX-ELEMENTS. 95 expression of the inter-relations of many complex substances, still, the two main aspects of metabolism — anabolic and katabolic — remain. § 5. Protozoa and Metazoa. — It has been emphasised above that every multicellular organism, reproduced in the ordinary way, starts from a fertilised ovum, from what may be fairly called a single cell. Sponge, butterfly, bird, and whale begin, in a sense, at the level of the simplest animals or Protozoa, which (with the exception of some which form colonies) remain always unicellular. The simplest organisms leave off where the higher plants and animals begin, i.e., as single corpuscles of living matter. They correspond, in fact, to the reproduc- tive cells of higher animals, and may be called, according to Ophrydium, a colonial infusorian. — From Saville Kent. their predominant character, protova and protosperms. A fertilised ovum, as we have seen, proceeds by division to form a "body"; the Protozoon remains, with few exceptions, a single cell, in which there is obviously no distinction between reproductive elements and the entire, organism. Reference will have to be made to the Protozoa in three connections, which may be here simply noted:— (a) In their chief groups, and in the stages of their life- histories, they express phases in the same cell cycle which recurs in higher forms in the component elements of the body, and in the reproductive cells. The contrast, in other words, between an infusorian and an amoeba, between the ciliated 9^ THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. and amoeboid stage in the life-history of many forms, is a fore- cast of the contrast between a ciliated cell and a white blood corpuscle, between a mobile spermatozoon and a young ovum. A predominance of the same protoplasmic processes is the basal interpretation of the similarities of form. (b) It is among the Protozoa that we must look, if we hope to understand the origin and import either of "male and female," or of fertilisation. (c) Among the loose colonies which some Protozoa form, and which bridge the gulf between the unicellular animals and the Metazoa, there is seen the beginning not only of the for- mation of a "body" (see figs, on pp. 94, 95), but also the setting apart of special reproductive cells. On this poirt more emphasis must be laid. The ordinary Protozoon is a single cell, and forms no body. It divides indeed, and multi- plies accordingly, but the products of division go asunder, whereas in the segmentation of the ovum they remain con- nected. In most Protozoa, there is continual self-recupera- tion; in most, division occurs without any loss; in most, there is no distinction between parent and offspring; in most, as there is no body, there is no death. Thus it is that, with one weighty caution to be afterwards noted, it seems justifiable to speak with Weismann and others of the "immortality of the Protozoa." In a certain sense too, as we shall see, it is justifi- able to speak of the immortality of the reproductive cells in higher animals. The body dies, but the reproductive cells escape, before its death, to live on, as new organisms, enclosing new sets of reproductive cells. Again there is similarity between the Protozoa and the reproductive cells. But in some of the loose colonies (e.g., Volvox), we see the beginning of the change which introduced death as a constant phenomenon (see fig. p. 139)- The cell, which starts one of these colonies, divides ; the products of division, instead of going apart as usual, remain connected; a loose body of many cells is thus formed. In this cluster of cells, certain elements are in turn set apart and eventually adrift, as reproductive cells. They start new colonies, and thus we are introduced to what is constant in higher animals. The only marked differ- ences are — (a) that the body of the Metazoon is more than a loose colony of cells; (b) that the reproductive elements are usually liberated from some definite region or organ ; and (c) that they are more markedly differentiated as male and female cells. THE ULTIMATE SEX-ELEMENTS. 97 § 6. General Origin of the Sex-Cells. — Except in the lowest invertebrates, the sponges and ccelenterates, the reproductive elements almost always arise in connection with the middle layer (mesoderm or mesoblast) of the body. . Neither in sponges nor in ccelenterates is there a middle layer exactly comparable to the mesoderm of higher animals; the less definite middle stratum is now frequently termed a mesoglsea. In sponges, we already mentioned that the reproductive cells simply arise here and there among the other elements of the stratum. The ova are highly nourished meso- gheal cells; the primitive male cells, which divide into numerous minute spermatozoa, are the reverse. In ccelenterates the phenomena are of much interest; the origin of the sex-cells is very diverse. Some time ago considerable emphasis was laid, by E. van Beneden and others, on the fact that, in certain Hydrozoa, " the ova are derived from the endoderm, and the sperms from the ectoderm." Thus Gegenbaur, accepting this, remarks that in such cases "the endoderm is the female, and the ectoderm the male germinal layer." Such a generalisation, if established, would be plausible enough, seeing that the inner or endoderm layer is the more nutritive or anabolic of the two. A controversy, however, soon arose, the result of which was to over- throw the generalisation. In hydra, we have already noticed that both products arise from the ectoderm; the same was shown by Ciamician to be true of Titbularia mesembryanthemum ; while in the EiUetidrium ramosunt the ova appeared to arise from the ectoderm, and the male elements from the endodenu, the very reverse of Van Beneden's conclusion. The matter was settled, so far as the general facts are concerned, by Weismann, who established the fact of active migration of the elements from one layer to another. He has since been followed by other investigators, (a) The sex- elements, both male and female, may appear first in the endoderm, whether they originate there or not, and from this inner layer they migrate to the ectoderm, where they ripen, (b) In rare cases they even ripen in the endoderm. (c) Very commonly the sex-cells originate in the ectoderm and ripen there, or they may pass thence into the endoderm and back again to the ectoderm, (d) In the medusa of Obelia, the ova appear to ripen partly in both layers. These facts, a convenient summary of which will be found in Hatchett Jackson's erudite edition of Rolleston's " Forms of Animal Life," show plainly enough how varied are the origin and history of the sex-cells in these forms. The colonial hydroids typically produce well marked reproductive individuals or sexual zooids, set free as "swimming-bells" or meduioids (in a process to be afterwards described under "Alternation of Genera- tions "). In these the reproductive elements are typically developed. But in varying degrees these medusoids have degenerated, and are frequently not only not liberated, but lose their characteristic features, and become mere reproductive buds. In these buds the sex-cells are normally developed. But it very frequently happens that they arise more or less in the body of the asexual vegetative hydroid. They ripen early, and sub- sequently migrate to their proper place; the asexual stage incorporating more and more of the originally separate sexual generation. Weismann has emphasised the value of this early ripening as an advantage to the race, 7 98 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. lessening the danger of its extinction ; and this has doubtless to be con- sidered. But important as all such considerations are, they cannot dispense with an enquiry into the physiology of the facts. § 7. Early Separation of Sex-Cells. — Having noted the general fact of mesodermic origin, and some of the interesting phenomena observed in ccelenterates, we shall not further pursue the subject except as regards one question, the period at which the reproductive cells make their appearance. This is sometimes early, sometimes late; and it is not yet decisively known in how many cases early separation occurs, nor how far the fact is of much significance. In the case of a well-known fly, Chironomus, Professor Bal- biani, unprejudiced by any theory of heredity, observed the following facts: — Before the segmentation of the egg had at all advanced, before what embryologists call the blastoderm was more than incipient, two cells were observed to be set apart externally. (These had nothing whatever to do with the polar globules seen in most ova at maturation.) The development proceeded apace, but the isolated cells took no share; they may be presumed to have retained intact the characters which they received when first divided off from the ovum. At a certain stage, however, the isolated cells sank inwards, took up an internal position, became the rudiments of the reproductive organs. Here then, at an early stage, before differentiation is marked, the reproductive cells are set apart. They must there- fore preserve much of the character of the parent ovum, and hand on the tradition intact by continuous cell-division to the next generation. In other words, in the preceding case, at a very early stage in the embryo, the future reproductive cells are distinguishable and separable from the body-forming cells. The latter develop in manifold variety, into skin and nerve, muscle and blood, gut and gland; they differentiate, and lose almost all protoplasmic likeness to the mother ovum. But the reproductive cells are set apart; they take no share in the differentiation, but remain virtually unchanged, and continue unaltered the protoplasmic tradition of the original ovum. After a while they, or their division-products rather, will be liberated as reproductive cells. These in a sense will be continuous with the parental germ. Their protoplasm will be more or less identical. The original ovum has certain characteristics, a b c x y z ; it divides, and all its cells must at first more or less share these characteristics; THE ULTIMATE SEX-ELEMENTS. 99 the body-cells lose some of them, the insulated reproductive cells retain them all. The ovum of the next generation has thus also the characteristics a b c x y z, and must therefore produce an organism essentially like the parent. An early isolation of the reproductive cells, though rarely so striking as in Chironomus, has been observed in many cases, — e.g., in some other insects, in the aberrant worm-type Sagitta, in leeches, in threadworms, in some Polyzoa, in some small crustaceans known as Cladocera, in the water-flea Moina, in the parasitic Hymenopteron Platygaster, in some arachnoids (Phalangidse), in the bony fish Micromettus aggregatus. As the series is ascended, the reproductive organs seem to be later in making their appearance, at least they are only detected at a later stage. It must also be pointed out that, in cases of alter- nation of generations, an entire asexual generation, or more than one, may intervene between one ovum and another. Perhaps the most striking of all the cases of the early segre- gation of the lineage of germ-cells is that described by Boveri in Ascaris megalocephala, the threadworm of the horse. He was able to trace back the germ-cells continuously to the two- cell stage. At the very first cleavage the distinction between somatic and reproductive is established. One of the first two cells is the ancestor of all the cells of the body; the other is the ancestor of all the germ-cells. " Moreover, from the out- set the progenitor of the germ-cells differs from the somatic cells not only in the greater size and richness of the chromatin of its nucleus but also in its mode of mitosis, for in all those blasto- meres destined to produce somatic cells a portion of the chromatin is cast out into the cytoplasm, where it degenerates, and only in the germ-cells is the sum-total of the chromatin retained." — (E. B. Wilson, "The Cell in Development and Inheritance," 1896, p. in.) § 8. Body Cells and Reproductive Cells. — Various naturalists have insisted on the contrast hinted at above, between the cells of the embryo which go to form the body and those which are set apart as reproductive organs. (a) As early as 1849, Owen noted that, in the developing germ, it was possible to distinguish between cells which became much changed to form the body, and cells which remained little changed and formed the reproductive organs. This view, as Brooks points out, he unfortunately afterwards departed from in his "Anatomy of the Vertebrates." 100 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. (6) In 1866, Haeckel connected reproduction with discon- tinuous growth, and insisted upon the material continuity between parent and offspring. Somewhat later, both he and Rauber drew a clear contrast between the somatic and repro- ductive elements, between the "personal" and "germinal" portions of the embryo, or between the body and the sex cells. (c) W. K. Brooks, in 1876 and 1877, again drew attention to this significant contrast. (d) Yet more explicit, in 1877, was the ingenious Dr Jager, now better known in a very different connection, and a few of his sentences well deserve to be quoted. Referring to a previous paper, he writes as follows: — "Through a great series of generations, the germinal protoplasm retains its specific properties, dividing in every reproduction into an ontogenetic portion, out of which the individual is built up, and a phylo- genetic portion, which is reserved to form the reproductive material of the mature offspring. This reservation of the phylogenetic material I described as the continuity of the germ- protoplasm. Encapsuled in the ontogenetic material, the phylo- genetic protoplasm is sheltered from external influences and retains its specific and embryonic characters." () At the same time, or in another case, it avails itself of the debris of surrounding cells. In many instances, e.g., in the minute ovary of hydra, in the ovary of Tubularia, or in the ovarian tubes of insects, the ovum is but the surviving competitor among a crowd of surrounding cells, which to start with were all potential ova. This is an often forgotten chapter in the struggle for existence, — the struggle between germ-cells. There is a struggle between potential ova ; there is also enormous elimination among the spermatozoa, even after they come to close quarters with the ovum. Many are almost suc- cessful, but in most cases only one fertilises, i.e., survives. And even after the eggs begin to develop there is often elimination apart from enemies, thus it is stated that only about a third of the eggs of the New Zealand " lizard " (Sphenodo?i or Hatlerid) ever hatch, (c) In the third place, and this is the rarest form, the egg-cell acquires a store of food-material from a special yolk gland, as in many of the lower " worms." The yolk, gained in one of the ways mentioned above, is more or less readily distinguished from what is often called the formative protoplasm. Out of the latter the embryo is built up, while the yolk has for the most part only a secondary and nutritive role. We cannot enter here into a discussion of the difficult embryological question as to the extent in which the yolk ever shares in directly contributing to embryonic structures. The possibility of distinguishing between for- mative protoplasm and the nutritive mateilal, depends on the quantity of the latter that is present, and on the way in which it is disposed, (a) When there is not much of it, as in the small ova of mammals and many invertebrates, the yolk material is diffusely distributed. Then the ovum undergoes complete segmentation. (b) In the frog's ovum, on the other hand, there is a large proportion of yolk, which has especially accumulated in the lower hemisphere of the cell, while the darker half includes the truly formative protoplasm. In this case too the egg divides as a whole, but the divisions go on much more rapidly in the upper hemisphere, and it is there that the embryo is really formed, (c) A distinct mode of yolk arrangement occurs in arthropods (crustaceans, insects, &c), where the centre, not a pole, of the ovum is occupied by THE EGG-CELL OR OVUM. 109 the nutritive material. In this case the formative protoplasm divides round about the nutrient qore. (d) In the majority of nsnes, in reptiles, and in birds, the eggs show a much more marked polar accumulation of yolk. On the top of a large mass of nutritive material, the specifically lighter formative protoplasm lies like a tiny drop, and in those cases the division The relation between the disposition of the yolk and the mode of segmentation: — A, diffuse yolk, e.g., sponge; B, polar, e.g., frog; C, central yolk, e.g., crayfish; D, predomi- nant, e.g., bird: — A', Total and equal segmentation; B', total and unequal; C', partial and peripheral; D', partial and discoidal segmentation. of the ovum is very partial, — that is, it is mainly restricted to the upper formative region. It is thus to be noted that the quantity of yolk present, and its diffuse, polar, or central arrangement, are associated with striking differences in the degree and symmetry of the segmentation. 110 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. § 4. Composite Ova. — We have emphasised the fact that the ovum must be regarded as a single cell. To this a definite but pedantic objection has been raised. In some parasitic flat worms there occur what have been called compound ova. A minute single cell arises, as usual, in the ovary, but in the course of its somewhat intricate history this becomes associated with several nutrient cells derived from the yolk-gland. These surround the original ovum, so that the whole now consists of several cells. But it must be noticed that only the central cell — the ovum proper — is fertilised, and that it contains all the formative protoplasm. Those that surround it are wholly nutritive ; they eventually break up, and are absorbed. In other cases, especially in insects, the ovum grows rich at the expense of neighbouring cells, which are sacrificed to its nutritive equipment. But it is evident enough that a cell remains a cell, however many of its neigh- bours it may happen to absorb. § 5' Eig Envelopes. — The ovum starts as a naked cell, but generally becomes furnished with ensheathing envelopes. The exact history of the egg-membranes and sheaths is a. very complex matter. Only the most general facts can here be stated. The envelopes may be derived [a) from the ovum itself, (b) from surrounding cells, {c) from the secretion of special glands. (a) Just as a protozoon often exhibits distinct outer and inner zones, distinguished by minor physical and chemical peculiarities, so it is with the ovum. What are called yolk or vitelline membranes are generally pro- duced by the ovum itself. Furthermore, the outer protoplasm often forms a distinct firm zone, known as the Zonapellucida. This may be traversed by fine radiating pores establishing nutritive communication with the exterior, and is then known as the Zona radiata. A special aperture or micropyle is sometimes present, through which the sperm enters, or nutri- tive supply is sustained. (6) The ovum, in its young stages, is very frequently seen surrounded by a circle of small cells, which form what is called a follicle. These may produce a membrane or a glairy investment. (c) As the ovum ripens, and passes from the ovary into the duct, it often becomes surrounded by gelatinous, horny, limy, and other invest- ments. In most cases, it necessarily follows that the egg has first been fertilised. The investments are usually referable to the activity of the walls of the oviduct or uterus, though sometimes there are special shell- glands, and the like. The chitinous cases of some insect ova, the horny mermaids' purses of many gristly fishes, the more or less limy egg- envelopes of reptiles, the firm limy egg-shells of birds, so often stained with pigments, afford good illustrations of these secondary investments. Quile distinct are cocoons, such as those of earthworm and leech, which surround several eggs, and are produced from the skin of the animal. It may here be noted that the rather puzzling bodies known as " wind- e gg s >" or more naively as cock's eggs, and regarded by some as the producls of immature or exhausted females, are most probably not eggs at all, but simply masses of albumen formed in the oviduct and coated with a shell. (Raspail, "Bull. Soc. Zool. France," xxiii., 1898, pp. 94-97.) § 6. Birds' Egos. — The student may be fitly directed to the egg of the fowl, or of some other bird, for a convenient concrete illustration of many facts. There he will see the great mass of THE EGG-CELL OR OVUM. Ill yolk, of two kinds, yellow and white, and on the top of this the minute area of formative protoplasm. It was on this, as it gradually revealed the cloudy outlines of the embryo chick, that the Greeks looked with naive unaided eyes. Here it was that Aldrovandus, Harvey, Malpighi, Haller, and the early embryologists, with clear vision, saw almost as much as their appliances would permit. It was this which, in its primitive simplicity, impressed Wolff with the reality of epigenesis; and it is this that the observers of to-day look down upon through their embryoscopes, or cut sections of with their microtomes. Then round about all is the secondary investment of " white of egg" or albumen; round this a shell membrane, between the two layers of which the little air-chamber is formed at one end ; and finally, the hard but porous limy shell. Mr Irvine, of Granton, has shown that fowls kept with access to no carbonate of lime, but only to other salts of lime, can still form a normal shell. This still consists of carbonate of lime, and is as firm as usual, demonstrating, like the same investigator's experiments on crabs, that animals possess no little power of changing one salt of lime into another. Then, in the eggs of other birds, the import of the seven or more pigments which produce the marvellous variety and beauty comes into question. Sorby has shown that they are related to the pigments of blood and bile; but what they exactly mean no one yet knows. Wider still, the problem arises of how this coloration is so often pro- tective. Or again, there is the curious fact that the size of the egg is often much out of proportion to the size of the bird, and the question arises as to how far this can be inter- preted as the result of the more or less anabolic and sluggish constitution. § 7. Chemistry of the Egg. — Every one knows that the eggs of birds form highly nutritious diet. As the egg contains nourishment for the young bird for a considerable time, it must, like milk, contain all the essentials of food. The results of a recent analysis of the fowl's egg may be taken as a sample. The germinal or formative disc consists chiefly of albuminoid bodies, apparently of the globulin group, plus smaller quantities of lecithin and the like. The subtle protoplasm itself, it need hardly be said, defies analysis. In the yolk there are firm fats (tripalmitin, probably plus a little stearine), and a fluid oil or glyceride. Fatty acids develop during hatching. A relatively large quantity of lime is present, probably, for the most part, as calcium albuminate. In the white of egg there are true albumins, also globulins, and the quantity of peptones increases with the age of the egg. I I 2 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX, During development the embryo becomes richer in mineral matters, fat, and albumen, and the dry substance of the whole contents of the egg diminishes considerably. The yolk of many different kinds of ova has been analysed, and the component substances distinguished as Ichthin (fishes), Emydin (tortoise), and the like. More important were the discoveries of cholesterin, vitellin, nucfoin, lecithin, and, in association with the latter, neiirin. As we can- not here enter into the physiological import of such substances, it is enough to say that the nutritive material in ova usually consists of a mixture of com- plex, unstable, and highly nutritive substances. § 8. Maturation of the Ovum. — When the egg-cell has attained its mature size, a more or less enigmatical occurrence takes place. The nucleus, hitherto generally central, moves to the pole, alters considerably in its structure, and divides. A minute cell, with half of the nucleus, and a small amount of protoplasm, is given off. Not long after, the nucleus remaining within the ovum repeats the process, and another tiny cell is expelled. This process is known as the extrusion of the polar globules. Of general, and probably of universal occurrence, it has been most satisfactorily studied in invertebrate types. There is considerable diversity as to the exact time at which the extrusion occurs; generally, however, it precedes the entrance of the fertilising sperm. The minute extruded cells never have any history, though they occasionally linger for a considerable time on the outskirts of the ovum. As an excep- tion, they have been seen themselves to divide, and, with equal rarity, a misguided spermatozoon has been observed to penetrate them. Usually, however, they simply dwindle away. The remaining female nucleus of the ovum is now ready to unite with the male nucleus of the spermatozoon. At this point, awaiting the essential moment of fertilisation, we shall for the present leave it. Weismann, assisted by C. Ischikawa, has demonstrated an exceedingly interesting fact in regard to polar globule extrusion in parthenogenetic ova. Instead of the two polar globules which are usually extruded, parthenogenetic ova were shown to form only one. This was demonstrated in a variety of cases, — in water-fleas (daphnids and ostracods) and rotifers, — and is believed to be a general fact. Blochmann, who has been suc- cessful in demonstrating polar globules in several orders of insects, has also observed that in the parthenogenetic ova of the plant-louse or aphis, only one polar globule is formed, while in other non-parthenogenetic aphid eggs, which only develop THE EGG-CELL OR OVUM. 113 after fertilisation, two occur as usual. To these facts we must afterwards recur in connection with parthenogenesis. What must be emphasised, however, is this: — the nuclei of the mature ovum and spermatozoon contain half the number of nuclear rods or chromosomes characteristic of the body- cells of the animal in question. In their early immature stages they contain the normal number. Therefore a reduction — a halving — of the number must take place during the process of maturation. The same is true in plants. Similarly, before the nuclear fusion in two conjugating individuals of the sun-animalcule (ActinoJ>hiys sol), there is, as Schaudinn has shown, a "reduction-division," half of each nucleus being got rid of, and there are several other pheno- mena in Protozoa which appear to be analogous to the matura- tion-processes in the ova of Metazoa. § 9. 7 'heories of the Polar Globules. — The polar globules appear to have been first observed in 1848 by Fr. Miiller and Lov^n, but it is only within recent years that much has. been made of them. Thanks to the masterly researches of Butschli and Hertwig, Giard, Fol, and others, it became possible to interpret the extrusion as a case of cell-division or budding. More recently, Van Beneden, whose monograph on the ovum of the threadworm (Ascaris) will remain one of the classics in this department of research, has raised a protest against regarding the extrusion as a normal cell-division. The details of the process, as interpreted by him, seemed to mark out the extrusion as something unique. Most authorities, however, adhere to the older view, that the process is essentially one of normal cell-division. As to the meaning of the process, the chief opinions, only a mere out- line of which can be given, are three, not including a number of suggestions according to which the extrusion of the globules is a kind of " excretion" of the ovum, or a "rejuvenescence" of the nucleus. (a) According to some, the egg-cell is in a sense hermaphrodite, and the polar-globule formation is an extrusion of the male element. Balfour expressed his view in somewhat teleological language: — " I would suggest that in the formation of the polar cells, part of the constituents of the germinal vesicle, which are requisite for its functions as a complete and independent nucleus, is removed to make room for the supply of the neces- sary parts to it again by the spermatic nucleus. ... I will venture to add the further suggestion, that the function of forming polar cells has been acquired by the ovum for the express purpose of preventing partheno- genesis." To this it must now be pointed out, that so far as one polar globule is concerned, extrusion does not prevent parthenogenesis. This view seems, according to Brooks, to have been first advanced by M'Crady. It has been most carefully elaborated by Minot. According to Minot, " in the cells proper, both sexes are potentially present ; to produce sexual elements the cell divides into its parts ; in the case of the egg-cell, the male polar globules are cast off, leaving the female ovum." In partheno- genetic ova, he supposes that enough male element is retained, since only IT4 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. one polar globule appears to be formed. Van Beneden, whose opinion is entitled to great weight, also inclines to regard the polar globules as male extrusions. Sabaticr distinguishes, besides true polar globules, other extrusions, and believes the eliminated parts to be male elements. His views are connected with an elaborate theory of polarities, according to which, for instance, the peripheral extrusions are male, while central cores (in the development of sperms) are female residues. (l>) A very different view— morphological rather than physiological — has been maintained by Giard (1876), Mark (i8Si), Biitschli, Whitman, and others, that the polar bodies are equivalent to ova. The formation of polar globules is an atavistic reminiscence of primitive parthenogenesis, just as the mother sperm-cell or spermatogonium, which corresponds in the male to the ovum in the female, divides up into what form spermatozoa, so the ovum retains a slight power of division. In short, the polar globules are " abortive ova." (c) According to Weismann, Hertwig, and others, the gist of the matter maybe expressed by the term "reducing-division." In different species the cells of the body are characterised by the possession of a definite number of chromatin elements. Thus, in one variety of the round-worm of the horse there are four, in man there are two hundred. In the maturation of ovum and spermatozoon the number is reduced preparatory to fertilisa- tion, so that the fertilised ovum contains the normal quota, and not double that as would be the case were there no reduction. The period and the details of the reduction seem to differ greatly, but the general fact stands out clearly that maturation implies a reduction of the number of chromo- somes in the ultimate germ-cells to one-half the number characteristic of the somatic cells of the species. The reduction phenomena occur in plants as well as in animals, but the details remain somewhat uncertain. In the higher plants the reduced number is seen in all the cells of the sexual or gametophyte generation, beginning with the asexual mother-spore-cells from v. hich this generation arises. THE EGG-CELL OR OVUM. 115 SUMMARY. 1. The ovum presents all the essential features of a cell — cytoplasm, nucleoplasm, etc. 2. The ovum often passes from an amoeboid to an encysted phase, with increase of nutrition and size. 3. The yolk is derived from the vascular fluid, or surrounding cells, or special glands, and is present in varying quantity and disposition. If little, it is diffuse; if much, it is polar or central ; and the different modes of egg- division are associated with this. 4. In some cases the ovum is surrounded by a number of nutritive cells (composite ova), and often becomes what it is by preying upon its neigh- bours. This hardly affects its unicellular character. 5. Egg-envelopes are produced from the ovum itself (e.g., vitelline membrane), or from surrounding cells (follicular sheath), or from special glands (the outside shell). 6. Bird's egg noted as a concrete illustration of facts and problems. 7. The egg, so far as its nutritive material is concerned, includes a mixture of complex, unstable, highly nutritive substances. 8. The maturation of the ovum is usually associated with a double cell- division, known as the extrusion of polar globules. In parthenogenetic ova only one occurs, with rare exceptions. 9. These polar globules have been interpreted variously: — (a) As extrusions of male elements; or (b) as abortive ova; but (c) the whole process implies a reduction of nuclear rods or chromosomes, preparatory to fertilisation. LITERATURE. Balfour, F. M.— Op. cit. Van Beneden, E. — Recherches sur la Fecondation. Arch, de Biologie, IV., 1883. Carnoy. — La Cellule, II., 1886, etc. Geddes, P. — Op. cit. Haddon, A. C.—Op. cit. Haecker, V.— The Reduction of the Chromosomes in the Sexual Cells. Annals of Botany, IX., 1895, pp. 95-101. Hensen, V. — Op. cit. Hertwig, O. — Op. cit. Hatchett Jackson. — Introduction to his edition of Rolleston's Forms of Animal Life. M'Kendrick, J. G. — On the Modern Cell Theory, &c. Proc. Phil. Soc. Glasgow, XIX., 1888. Minot, C. S.— American Naturalist, XIV., 1880. STRASBURGER. — The Periodic Reduction of the Number of the Chromo- somes in the Life-history of Living Organisms. Annals of Botany, VIII., 1894, pp. 281-316. Il6 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. Thomson, J. A.— Recent Researches on Oogenesis. Quarterly Journ. Micr. Sci., XXVI., 1886. Art. Embryology, Chambers's Encyclopedia. Weismann, A. — Die Continuitat des Keimplasmas. Jena, 1885. Die Eedeutung der sexuellen Fortpflanzung. Jena, 1886. ■ And other papers translated, " Essays on Heredity," etc. Oxford, 1889. — The Germ Plasm. London, 1893. Wilson, E. B.— The Cell in Development and Inheritance. New York, 1896, 371 pp., 142 figs. CHAPTER IX. The Male-Cell or Spermatozoon. § i. The General Contrast between Ovum and Spermatozoon. — Just as the ovum, large, well nourished, and passive, is as such a cellular expression of female characteristics, so the smaller size, less nutritive habit, and predominant activities of the spermatozoa illustrate the qualities of maleness. As the ovum is usually one of the largest, the sperm is one of the smallest of cells, sometimes only T¥ ^.inns-th of the size of the ovum, which is often microscopic. The yolk or food-capital, and encysting membranes, which are often so prominent in the former, are as conspicuously absent in the latter. The con- trast, though less accented, is still quite discernible in plants, In fact, the two kinds of cells are just as widely opposed in their general features, as they are fundamentally complemen- tary in their history. Before this opposition and complemen- tariness can be fully understood, however, we must briefly sum up the characters and history of the male elements. § 2. History of Discovery. — In 1677, one of Leeuwenhoek's students, Hamm by name, called his master's attention to the minute elements actively moving in the male fluid. Leeuwenhoek, who some years pre- viously for the first time observed what we now know as unicellular organisms, was at once impressed by the import of the marvellously active male units. Almost too much impressed, in fact, for he interpreted them as minute preformed germs, which only required to be nourished by the ovum to unfold into embryos. Thus the unfortunate aberration, already noted as the doctrine of the animalculists, had its origin. For long no progress whatever was made; some naturalists, like Vallisneri, depreciating the import of the sperms altogether, and regarding them as worms which hindered the coagulation of the seminal fluid; others going to the opposite extreme, and regarding them as nests of germs. Thus Haller at first considered them to be what Leeuwenhoek had suggested, but afterwards admitted them merely as nativi hospites seminis. In 1835, even Von Baer was inclined to interpret them as minute parasites peculiar to the male fluid; and if the curious student will turn up the article Entozoa in Todd's "Cyclopaedia of Anatomy and Physiology," of about the same date, he will find that the veteran Owen includes the spermatozoa under that strange riS THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. heading. The very name spermatozoon recalls the view which so long prevailed. In 1837, R. Wagner emphasised their constancy in all the sexually mature males which he examined, and their absence in infertile male hybrids. Von Siebold demonstrated their presence in many of the lower animals; and lastly, in 1841, Kolliker made one of his many important contributions to biology, in proving that the sperms had a cellular origin in the testes. § 3. Structure of the Spe?-m. — The sperm, then, is a cell. Though some, such as Kolliker, have inclined to regard it rather as a nucleus, its truly cellular character has been proved beyond dispute. As in the ovum, there is cell-substance and nucleus, with this marked difference, that the cell-substance is generally reduced to a minimum. The sperm is almost always, moreover, a cell of a very definite type or phase. It is like one of the highly motile " Spermatic Animalculi " of the Rabbit and the Dog. — From Buffon, after Leeuwenhoek. Protozoa, like a flagellate infusorian. Usually it consists of a minute "head," consisting almost entirely of nucleus, and of a long contractile tail, which, working behind like a screw, propels the essential "head" through the water or along the ducts. Between the head and the tail there is an important middle portion, which many observers agree in regarding as the bearer of the centrosome — a now well-known component of a typical animal cell. Occasionally there is a departure from the usual flagellate type. Thus in the threadworm Ascaris, the sperm has a blunt pear-shaped form, and exhibits slight amceboid movements. In some crustaceans and other arthropods, the cell is even more quiescent, and may exhibit curious forms, such as that figured for the crayfish. The relatively dormant activity may however wake up, and the sperm exhibit active amceboid movements. Zacharias has made some interesting experiments, showing the THE MALE-CELL OR SPERMATOZOON. lie. tnodifiability of sperms under reagents; thus, in a little crus- tacean {Polyphemus pediculus), he first caused the cylindrical sperm to form amoeboid processes, and afterwards to replace these by what were to all intents and purposes cilia. This is entirely congruent with other experiments and observations on the passage of cells from one phase of the cell-cycle to another. F. Silvestri records the interesting case of the millipede Pachyiulus communis in which the spermatozoon is immobile and cap-shaped, and is drawn into the ovum by a pseudo- podium emitted by the latter through the micropyle. In other words, the ovum here plays the active role, and the spermato- zoon is passive. ("Atti Ace. Lincei (Rend.)," vii., 1898, pp 129133. 5 figs.) Spermatozoa of crayfish (a), lobster (<5), crab (c), ascarid (d), water-flea — Moina (e) s man (/"), ray (g), rat (A), guinea- pig (2), a beetle — immature stage (k), sponge if). (Not drawn to scale.) The progress of microscopic technique has demonstrated many com- plexities in the sperm as well as in the ovum. For a discussion of some of the more important of these, the reader is referred to the " Encyclopaedia Britannica," article Reproduction. A few points only need be noticed here. Thus most spermatozoa exhibit not only a head (almost wholly from the nucleus of the mother-cell) and a mobile tail (from the substance of the mother-cell), but a median portion connecting these. The tail is not unfrequently, as in salamander and man, furnished with a very delicate un- dulating or vibratile band, and often shows, as in birds, an axial filament, which like many other contractile structures is distinctly fibrillated. In a few cases, as in the threadworm, the sperm is not left without any nutritive capital, but furnished with this in the form of a cap, which falls off before the essential moment of fertilisation arrives. It is very generally admitted i 20 THE EVOLUTION OF SEx:. that the head consists almost wholly of chromatin, and that the tail is mainly cytoplasmic, i.e., formed of cell-substance. The middle part con- necting head and tail is believed by many to be formed by the centrosomes, which play some part in the division of the egg. In the non-flowering plants the male-cells or antherozoids often bear a close resemblance 10 those of animals; in the flowering plants the male-elements are the reproductive nuclei which issue from the pollen-tube; but the discoveries of Hirase and Ikeno have shown that even in flowering plants, namely in Cycads, there are motile spermatozoa. It is of interest to notice that a dimorphism of spermatozoa has been recorded in various cases, e.g. , by Auerbach for water-beetles, and even in man by Bardeleben. As has been already noted, there is sometimes, as in Rotifers, a dimorphism of ova, and it is probable that we have here again an illustration of the fundimental varia- tional alternatives, — between relatively hatabolic and relatively anabolic phases. Apart from this dimorphism, it should be noted that in the testis of many higher animals, there seems to be, as in the ovary, a division of labour between germ-cells proper and nutritive cells auxiliary to these. § 4. Physiology of the Spermatozoon. — A few facts in regard to the physiology of the sperm demand notice, {a) It is specialised as a highly active cell; its minimal size, the usual absence of any encumbering nutritive material, the contractility of the tail, and the general shape, all fit it for characteristic mobility. More than one histologist has likened it to a free muscle-cell, or to a flagellate monad, (b) Furthermore, the sperm has very considerable power of persistent vitality. Not only does it often remain long unexpelled in the male animal, without losing its functions, but it may retain its fertil- ising power after remaining for weeks, or even months, in the female organism. In the earthworm, the spermatozoa pass from one worm to another, not directly to the ova nor to female ducts, but to be stored up in special reservoirs or spermatheca?. So it is with many animals. The spermatozoa received by the queen bee during her single impregnation, are for a considerable period — even for three years — used in fertil- ising successive sets of worker and queen ova. . Quite unique, however, is the case of one of Sir John Lubbock's queen ants, which laid fertile eggs thirteen years after the last sexual union with a male. The spermatozoa had apparently persisted all that time. Hensen cites the facts that a hen will lay fertilised eggs eighteen days, after the removal of the cock, and that in bats, spermatozoa may remain alive a whole winter in the uterus of the female. In most European bats, indeed, sexual union occurs in autumn, but the sperms are simply stored in the uterus, for ovulation and fertilisation do not take place till the male-Cell or spermatozoon. 121 spring. In exceptional cases, especially in young forms which were not mature in autumn, pairing occurs in spring. An exactly parallel condition is known in some snakes. Thus Rollinat notes in regard to Tropidonotus viperinus that mature females are inseminated in the autumn previous to the egg- laying (in June or July), but in females laying for the first time, copulation probably occurs in early spring (" Bull. Soc. Zool. France, "xxiii., 1898, pp. 59-63). (c) Remarkable too, and again suggestive of monads, is the power the sperms have of resisting great deviations from the normal temperature. The presence of acids has usually a paralysing influence, but alka- line solutions have, on the whole, the opposite result. Diagram of the Development of Spermatozoa (upper line), of the Maturation and Fertilisation of the Ovum (lower line). a, an amoeboid sex-cell ; A, ovum, with germinal vesicle, n ; B, ovum extruding first polar body, j* 1 ; C, extrusion of second polar body, / 2 , nucleus n 2 , now reduced. 1, a mother-sperm-cell, dividing (2, 3) into immature and mature spermatozoa (s/.). D, the entrance of a spermatozoon ; E, the male and female nuclei sp. 11 and « 2 approach one another. § 5. Origin of i lie Sperms. — For the last twenty years the development of spermatozoa has-been the subject of almost continuous research and controversy, and the all too-abundant nomenclature affords a suggestive index to the confusion out of which the subject is now emerging. In a general way, the process is simply that of the varied segmentation of a mother- sperm-cell, and the occurrence of a series of preparatory stages before the sperm is finally matured. In detail, however, there are many variations, and these are described in a maze of often tautologous and ambiguous terms, such as spermatogonium, 121 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. spermatoblast, spermatospore, spermatogemma, spermatomere, spermosphere, and a dozen more. One of the most defensible set of terms is that used by Voigt after Semper, and also by Von la Valette St George. The sperm or spermatozoon is differentiated from an immature cell or spermatide, this is modified from or descended from a spermatocyte, the spermatocytes result from the division of the mother-sperm-cell or spermatogonium, and this finally is a modified form or a descendant of the primitive sex-cell or male ovule. Comparison of Spermatogenesis and Ovum Segmentation. Explanation. — The first line, A-E, exhibits types of ovum segmentation: — A, regular morula; E, unequal segmentation, e.g., in some Molluscs; C, centrolecithal or peripheral type, £.£"., in a shrimp Peneus; D, discoidal segmentation ; E, the same, with the cells less markedly defined off from the yolk.- In the next two lines various types of spermatogenesis are collated with the above to illustrate the parallelism : — A' and A", morula type, as in Sponge, Turbellarian, Spider, &c. ; B' and B", where the division is unequal, and one large nutritive cell is seen (Plagiostome fishes, after Von la Valette St George); C and C", after Blomfield, Jensen, &c, showing central cytophoral or blastophoral nutritive portion; D' and D", sperm-blastoderm, with a few formative cells on large nutririve blastophore, after Gilson, &c. ; E' and E", the same, with the sperm cells less definitely separated off, after Von Ebner and his followers. Difficulties become thick, however, when we inquire into the division of the mother-sperm-cell or spermatogonium, and it is here that the observa- tions of recognised authorities so much disagree. Accepting the results of competent observers, we have elsewhere endeavoured to rationalise and unify the conflicting observations, by comparing the different modes of spermatogenesis with the different forms of ovum-segmentation. It has THE MALE-CELL OR SPERMATOZOON. 1 23 been already incidentally noticed" that the egg-cell may divide wholly and equally, or unequally, or only very partially, or round a central core. Just in the same way the mother-sperm-cells may divide into a uniform ball of cells, or only at one pole, or only at the periphery round a central residue. Balfour and others had hinted at this comparison in the use of terms like sperm-morula; and Hermann had also concluded, "that the division of the male ovule into a series of generations of daughter-cells, is a phenomenon comparable to that exhibited by the ovum in the formal ion of the blastoderm. ... It seems then more important to determine exactly the mechanism of division, than to give a particular name to each stage of segmentation." Although this interpretation of spermatogenesis by collating it with ovum segmentation appears to Minot "a fanciful comparison," in favour of which he is "unable to recognise any evidence," neither the initial homology between the mother-sperm-cell and ovum with which we start, nor the striking parallelism between the modes of division of these homologues, seem thereby even disputed, much less shaken. The widely different conditions in which these two processes occur, and their very different meaning to the organism, are of course obvious. § 6. Further Comparison of Ovum and Sperm. — It is often said that the sperm is the male cell which corresponds to the ovum. This is only true in a certain sense. In function the two elements are indeed, in a general way, of equal rank, and are obviously complementary. But even in this respect, the two elements, which unite in equal proportions in the essential act of fertilisation, are not exactly sperm and ovum, but (a) the head or nucleus of the sperm and (b) the female nucleus doubly reduced by the extrusion of two polar globules. The accurate structural resemblance or homology seems to be between oogonium or primitive female germ-cell and spermatogonium or primitive male germ-cell, or between the immature ovarian ovum or oocyte and the spermatocyte. The parallelism between the reduction of the number of chromosomes in the maturation of the ovum and the similar reduction in the course of spermatogenesis is of great interest and importance. Unfortunately the results of different observers and in regard to different organisms remain perplexingly discrepant. Professor E. B. Wilson gives the following state- ment with special reference to the case of Ascaris megalocephala, the threadworm of the horse: — " Like the ova, the spermatozoa are descended from primordial germ- cells which by mitotic division give rise to the spermatogonia from which the spermatozoa are ultimately formed. Like the oogonia, the spermato- gonia continue for a time to divide with the usual (somatic) number of chromosomes, i.e., four in Ascaris megalocephala bivalens. Ceasing for a time to divide, they now enlarge considerably to form spermatocytes, each of which is morphologically equivalent to an unripe ovarian ovum, or oocyte. Each spermatocyte finally divides twice in rapid succession, giving rise first to two daughter-spermatocytes and then to four spermatids, each of which is directly converted into a single spermatozoon. The history of the chromatin in these two divisions is exactly parallel to that in the for- mation of the polar bodies. . . . From each spermatocyte arise four spermatozoa, and each sperm-nucleus receives half the usual number of single chromosomes. The parallel with the egg-reduction is complete." §7. Chemistry of the Sperm. — Comparatively little has been done in 124 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. regard to the chemistry of the male elements in different animals. The most important observations are those of Miescher, on the milt of salmon. His analysis demonstrated the presence of lecithin, fat, and cholesterin, — also component parts of the ovum. Besides these, after the heads of the spermatozoa have been formed, Miescher detected the abundant presence of a substance which he called protamine, a compound of nucleic acid. Albuminoid material, and products of decomposition, such as sarkin and guanin, were demonstrated, according to Hensen, by Picard. More recently, Kossel has shown that the protamin in the salmon's sperms and the analogous sturin in those of the sturgeon, act as basic substances forming a salt-like combination with the nuclein substances. ("SB. K. Preuss-Akad. Berlin," 1896, pp. 303-308.) It is remarkable, however, as Dr T. Gregor Brodie points out ("Science Progress," vii., 1898, pp. 131-149), that the spermatozoa consist of substances which, relatively to proteids, are of simple con- stitution. " If it be true that hereditary characteristics are transmitted by the chromatin of the reproductive cells, we should have expected a most complex chemical structure for these parts; and it therefore becomes the more striking to note that the most complex protamine as yet obtained, arbacin, is from an animal low in the scale (Arbacia, a sea-urchin), and that in the higher vertebrates examined no protamine is present at all." Zacharias has made a micro-chemical comparison of the male and female elements in Characese, mosses, ferns, phanerogams, and amphibians. He finds that the male cells are distinguished by their small or absent nucleoli, and by their rich content of nuclein; while the female elements exhibited a poverty of nuclein, an abundance of albumen, and one or more nucleoli, more or less large in proportion. The male cells have, in relation to their protoplasm, a larger nuclear mass than the female elements. It is interesting to notice that an analysis of two different kinds of pollen showed a great analogy of composition between these male repro- ductive cells and those of the salmon and ox. THE MALE-CELL OR SPERMATOZOON 1 2 5 SUMMARY. 1. The contrast between the elements is that between the sexes. The large, passive, highly- nourished, relatively anabolic ovum; the small, active, relatively katabolic sperm. 2. Hamm's discovery, 1677; Leeuwenhoek's interpretation ; the school of animalculists ; Kolliker's demonstration of the cellular origin of the sperm, 1841. 3. Structure of the sperm, — nuclear "head" of chromatin, protoplasmic " tail," middle portion. The sperm comparable to a monad or flagellate infusorian, only with less cell-substance. Its occasional degradation into the amoeboid phase. 4. Physiology of the sperm ; its locomotor energy at a maximum, but yet great power of endurance, like a monad or bacillus. 5. Origin of sperms from the division of a mother-sperm-cell homo- logous with the ovum. The different modes of "spermatogenesis " may be collated with the different modes of ovum-segmentation. 6. The occurrence in sperm-development of phenomena comparable both structurally and functionally with polar-globule formation. 7. Chemistry of the sperm ; resemblance between pollen and sperma- tozoa. LITERATURE. Baixowitz, E. — Structure of Spermatozoon. Archiv. Mikr. Anat., XXXII., 1888, pp. 401-473, 5 pis. Geddes, P., and Thomson, J. A. — History and Theory of Spermato- genesis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1886, pp. 803-823, 1 pi. See also Zoological Record from 1886. Hirase, S. — Journ. Coll. Sci. Tokyo, XII., 1898, pp. 102-149, 3 pis., 2 figs. Ikeno, S. — Jahrb. wiss. Bot., XXXII., 1898, pp. 557-602, 3 pis., 2 figs. Journ. Coll. Sci. Tokyo, XII., 1898, pp. 151-214, 8 pis. Wilson, E. B. — The Cell in Development and Inheritance, 1896; new ed., 1900. CHAPTER X. Theory of Sex — its Nature and Origin. Having got so far in our analysis, and before passing to the study of the processes of reproduction, we must add up the results in a general theory of the nature and origin of sex. After this has been done, we shall be in a better position to deal, in Book III., with fertilisation, parthenogenesis, and the like. The number of speculations as to the nature of sex has been well-nigh doubled since Drelincourt, in the last century, brought together two hundred and sixty-two "groundless hypotheses," and since Blumenbach quaintly remarked that nothing was more certain than that Drelincourt's own theory formed the two hundred and sixty-third. Subsequent in- vestigators have, of course, long ago added Blumenbach's " Bildungstrieb " to the list ; nor is it claimed that the generalisation we have in our turn offered has yet received "final form," if that phrase indeed be ever permissible in an evolving science, except when applied to what is altogether extinct. This much, however, is distinctly maintained, that future developments of the theory of sex can only differ in degree, not in kind, from that here suggested, inasmuch as the present theory is, for the first time, an expression of the facts in terms which are agreed to be fundamental in biology, those of the anabolism and katabolism of protoplasm. § i. Suggested Theories. — According to Rolph, — a fresh and ingenious thinker, removed before attaining his mature strength, — " the less nutritive, and therefore smaller, hungrier, and more mobile organism [cells, he is speaking of] we call the male; the more nutritive, and usually more quiescent organism is the female." He goes on vividly to suggest why "the small starving male cell seeks out the large well-nourished female cell for the purposes of conjugation, to which. the latter, the larger and better nourished it is, has on its own motive less inclination," THEORY OF SEX.^ITS NATURE AND ORIGIN. I27 Minot, in his "theory of genoblasts,'' or sexual elements, ventures little further than regarding male and female as derivatives of primitive hermaphroditism in two opposite directions. " As evolution continued, hermaphroditism was replaced by a new differentiation, in consequence of which the individuals of a species were — some capable of producing ova only, others of producing spermatozoa only. Individuals of the former kind we call females, of the latter males, and they are said to have sex." " At present all we can say is, we do not know why or how sexual individuals are produced." In regard to the sex-elements, we have already noticed his opinion that they are at first "hermaphroditic or asexual," and that both differentiate by the extrusion or separation of the con- tradictory elements, the ovum getting rid of male polar globules, the sperms leaving behind a female mother-cell-remnant. Brooks has emphasised rather a different aspect of the question. " A division of physiological labour has arisen during the evolution of life, the functions of the reproductive elements have become specialised in different directions." " The male cell became adapted for storing up gemmules, and, at the same time, gradually lost its unnecessary and useless power to transmit hereditary characteristics." " The males are, as a rule, more variable than the females; the male leads, and the female follows, in the evolution of new races." Brooks does not exactly attack the problem of the nature and origin of sex, but his hypothesis of the greater variability of males is of interest. To others, again, it seems sufficient to interpret sexual dimorphism as an adaptation evolved in the course of natural selection from variations of which no rationale can be given. As to the adaptive character of sex there can be no doubt, our problem is whether the variations which gave rise to the dimorphism may not be interpreted in terms of the two main alternatives of protoplasmic metabolism. § 2. Nature of Sex as seen in the Sex-Elements — The Cell Cycle. — As ova and sperms are the characteristic products of female and male organisms, it is reasonable that an interpreta- tion of sex should start at this level. Here, assuredly, the difference between male and female has its fundamental and most concentrated expression. For the bodies, after all, as Weismann has so clearly emphasised, are but appendages to this immortal chain of sex-cells. 128 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. We have already pointed out that the sex-cells are more or less on a level with the Protozoa. If we only knew, they probably differ widely from them in those intricacies of nuclear structure of which we only see the surface; yet as single cells the sex-cells are comparable with the Protozoa. For the moment, let _us study those simplest organisms. When we consider an extended series of unicellular forms, amoebae, foraminifers, sun-animalcules, infusorians, gregarines, and some of the simplest alga? as well, we gradually begin to group these in the mind under three divisions. First there are highly active cells, — infusorians of all sorts; at the opposite extreme there The divergence of male and female cells from pi iinitive amoeboid indifference. are quiescent forms, in which the life seems to sleep, and loco- motion is almost absent, — the gregarines, and some unicellular algas; and between these there are forms which in a via media have effected a sort of compromise between activity and pas- sivity, which are without the cilia of the one or the relative stagnancy of the other, but possess outfiowings of their living substance, — the familiar amceboid processes. We may thus reach, almost by inspection, a rough and ready classification of the Protozoa, into active, passive, and amceboid cells, — a classification which, under varying titles, is more or less dis- tinctly recognised by all the authorities on the subject. THEORY OF SEX — ITS NATURE AND ORIGIN. 129 But if we go further than casual inspection, and study the life-history of some of the very simplest forms, such as some The encysted Protomyxa, and its diviric.il into numerous individuals within the cyst. — From Haeckel. of the primitive Proteomyxa and Myxomycetcs, and follow, for instance, Haeckel's account of the life-cycle in Protomyxa, we soon gain new light on our classification. For in these life- The cyst of Protomyxa bursting, the flagellate young stages becoming amoeboid, and eventually uniting in a composite amoeboid mass, or " Plasmodium." — From Haeckel. histories we find the cells now encysted, now active lashed spores, and again sinking down into the compromise of equilibrium 9 130 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. effected by amoebae. We are now in a position to recognise that the chapters in the life-history of the simplest forms are, as it were, prophecies of each of the three groups. In other words, the most primitive organisms passed through a cycle of three phases, one of which is accented by each of the three main groups of the Protozoa. And while each main group is characterised by one dominant phase of cell-life, — encysted, amoeboid, or flagellate, — there are often transient hints of V A"" H \-^- Tc Diagram of the Cell-cycle,— of encysted (E), ciliated (C), and amoeboid (A) phases. L, II., III., in Protozoa; IV., ovum and sperm of fern prothallus ; V., encysted, ciliated, and amoeboid animal cells; VI., ciliated animal cell pathologically becoming amoeboid ; VII., typical and amoeboid sperm ; VIII., amoeboid and encysted ovum. — From Geddes. other phases. Thus an infusonan has its encysted chapter, a gregarine its amoeboid stage, and a rhizopod may begin as a mobile ciliated spore ; for each group, while accenting one phase of the cycle, retains embryonic reminiscences of the others. We become more convinced that the triple division really means much when we pass from the Protozoa to the cells which compose higher animals. There we find active ciliated cells THEORY OF SEX — ITS NATURE AND ORIGIN. 131 in most of the classes, from the ciliated chambers which lash the water through a sponge, to the cells lining the air passages in man; passive encysted cells are illustrated in some forms of connective, fatty, and skeletal tissue; while the white blood corpuscles are obviously comparable to amcebas. Extended observation here also shows us the cells passing from one phase to another. Our rough classification of the Protozoa is verified in the histology of higher animals, and reappears in the study of their diseases. We are thus at length in a position to say, that however these three phases were brought about, the forms characteristic of them are of such wide occurrence through nature as to justify our restatement of the familiar cell theory in terms of a larger conception, that of the cell-cycle. That is to say, from the conception of the cell as a corpuscle of living protoplasm, amoeboid, encysted, or ciliated, as the case might be, we come to regard these forms as the predominant phases of a cycle, — primeval, certainly, in the history of the organic world, and largely so even in the individual cell. A final corroboration of the cell-cycle, and at the same time a rationale of it, is obtainable on physiological lines, when we inquire into the protoplasmic processes which lie behind the changes in the form and habit. We have already spoken of the modern physiologist's conception of living matter, or proto- plasm, as an exceedingly complex and unstable substance or mixture of substances, undergoing continual chemical change or metabolism. On the one hand, there is a process of con- struction ; the income of nutritive material, at first more or less simple, is worked up by a series of chemical changes till it reaches a climax of complexity and instability. These upbuild- ing, constructive, synthetic processes are summed up in the term anabolism. But, on the other hand, there is a process of disruption ; the complex material breaks down into more and more stable compounds, and finally into waste products. This disruptive, descending series of chemical changes is known as katabolism. Both constructive and disruptive changes occur in manifold series. The same summit may be gained or left by many different paths, but at the same time there is, as it were, a distinct watershed, — any change in the cell must tend to throw the preponderance towards one side or the other. In a certain sense too the processes of income and expenditure must balance, but only to the usual extent, that expenditure must not altogether outrun income, else the cell's capital of 132 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. living matter will be lost, — a fate which is often not successfully avoided. The disruptive, or katabolic, or energy-expending set of changes may be obviously greater in one cell than in another, in proportion to the constructive or anabolic processes. Then, we may shortly say that the one cell is relatively more katabolic than the other, or vice vers& on the opposite supposi- tion. Just as our expenditure and income should balance at the year's end, but may vastly outstrip each other at particular times, so it is with the cells of the body. Income may for a time preponderate, and we increase in wealth, or similarly, in weight, or in anabolism. Conversely, expenditure may pre- dominate, and business may be prosecuted at a loss; just as we may live on for a while with loss of weight, or with excessive wear and tear. This losing game of life is what we call a katabolic habit, tendency, or diathesis ; the converse gaining one being the anabolic habit, tendency, or diathesis. The words anabolic and katabolic are, of course, unfamiliar, and undeniably ugly. Habit and temperament have very vague associations, and tendency sounds metaphysical ; diathesis, again, seems no better than the medical equivalent of this. These things the reader must naturally feel ; yet the medical man has some definite concrete meaning in his mind when he speaks of gouty or neurotic diathesis, of bilious habit, strumous tendency, or the like. There is more than metaphysical vague- ness in his phraseology, and in ours. We are now in a position proStably to return to the Pro- tozoa, to the phases of cell-life, and to the sex-elements. After what we have just said, it is evident that there are but three main physiological possibilities, — preponderant anabolism, or predominant katabolism, or an approximate (i.e., oscillating) equilibrium between these tendencies. A growing surplus of income, a lavish expenditure of energy, or a compromise in which the cell lives neither far below nor quite up to its income. Great passivity, great activity, or a safe average between these ; conservative accumulation, spendthrift liberal- ism, and a compromise between these. In many different ways, more or less metaphorical, we may express the plain and indubitable facts of anabolism and katabolism within the living matter. The student may think of the processes, with some degree of accuracy, under the metaphor of a ceaseless fountain, which, while remaining approximately constant, is the expres- sion of continual ascent and descent of drops. The protoplasm THEORY OF SEX — ITS NATURE AND ORIGIN. I33 itself must often be in as ceaseless change as the apex of the jet. In active, motile, ciliated, or flagellate cells, whether they be constant forms or only phases, there is relatively predominant katabolism, — predominant when compared with the life ex- penditure of a passive, quiescent, enclosed, or encysted cell. In amoeboid organisms these extremes are avoided ; there is certainly great amplitude of variation still, but neither anabolism nor katabolism gains the ascendant in any marked degree. Suppose, then, in such an amoeboid cell, a continued surplus of anabolism over katabolism, the result is necessarily a growth in size, a reduction of kinetic energy and movement, an increase in potential energy and reserve food-material. Irregularities will tend to disappear, surface-tension too may aid, and the cell acquires a spheroidal form. The result — surely intelligible enough — is a large and quiescent ovum. It will be remembered that young ova are very frequently amoeboid ; that with a copious nutrition this disappears in varying degrees of encystment; that ensheathing envelopes arising from the ovum, sweated off like cysts round Protozoa, are exceedingly common ; and that ova are the largest of all animal cells. Starting once more from an amoeboid cell, if katabolism comes to be more and more marked, the increasing liberation of kinetic energy thus implied must find its outward expression in increased activity of movement and in diminished size ; the more active cell becomes modified in form, in adaptation to passage through its fluid environment, and the natural result is a flagellate sperm. In short, then, the respective morphological characters of the sex-cells, female and male, find the same physiological rationale as do the large passive encysted and smaller active ciliated phases of the cell-cycle in general, and are alike the outcome and expression of predominant anabolism and kata- bolism respectively. Here again we reach the same formula as before ; or, more cumbrously in words — the functions are either self-maintaining or species -maintaining, individual or reproductive; the former are divided into anabolic and kata- bolic, the latter into male and female. But the second set of products and processes, so far from being unrelated to the other, as is commonly supposed, are in complete parallelism. Femaleness is relative anabolic preponderance in reproduction, 134 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. hence the ovum has necessarily the general character which this "diathesis" produces in non -reproductive cells; and, similarly, relative katabolic preponderance stamps its character of active energy upon the spermatozoon as naturally as upon the ciliated cell or the monad. Here and throughout it must be remembered that we are dealing with relative preponderance of anabolism or kata- bolism, — with ratios in metabolism. The more exact expres- sion of our point is that the ratio tf in the female is greater than the ratio y? in the male. Diagram showing the divergence of ovum and spermatozoon from an undifferentiated amoeboid type of cell. Rolph's characterisation of the male cells as hungry and starving (kata- bolic) has been experimentally confirmed by their powerful attraction to highly nutritive fluids, and is every day illustrated in their persistent attraction to the ova. Platner has suggested, in the intimately herma- phrodite gland of the snail, that the external cells which form the ova are better nourished than the central cells which divide into sperms. Just as an infusorian in dearth of food is known in some cases to divide into many small individuals, so the mother-spenn-cell is perhaps the seat of similar katabolic necessities. The long persistence of vitality seems at first sight a difficulty, if the sperms are highly katabolic cells. It must be noticed, however, {a) That there is often only retention, not continuance of activity, e.g., when the sperms lie closely packed in the special storing reservoirs; (b) That the secretions of the female ducts probably afford some nutriment to the sperms, which expose an exceptionally large surface in proportion to their mass; and (c) That to a certain extent we may think of them as protoplasmic explosives, which may remain long inert, but on the presence "THEORY OF SEX — ITS NATURE AND ORIGIN. 1 35 of the required stimulus are able to start again into extraordinary activity. That they have, like the exhausted infusorians in Maupas's experiment, reached the limit of their dividing power, is also evident. We might refer, for instance, to Von Bardeleben's observations of futile attempts at division (cytokinesis without karyokinesis) in the final stages of spermato- genesis in man ("Jena. Zeitschr. Nat.," xxxi., 189S, pp. 475-520, 3 pis., 5 figs.). Professor Giard has discussed the question of the possible partheno- genesis of the male elements or microgametes ("Comptes Rendus Soc. Biol. Paris," 1899). He suggests that the phenomena observed by Delage, and termed " merogonic," where a non-nucleated ovum-fragment, fertilised by a spermatozoon, proceeds to develop normally, may be regarded as cases where the microgamete or sperm-cell develops parthenogenetically. Siedlecki has observed the parthenogenetic development of the micro- gamete of the Sporozoon Adelea ovata; the same, as Klebs and others have shown, may occur in the lower plants. § 3. The Problem of the O/igin of Sex. — We must now return once more to the standpoint of the empirical naturalist, and set out towards the interpretation of sex from a different side, that of its origin. It has often been raised as a reproach against the now fortunately dominant school of evolutionist naturalists, that they could give no account of the origin of sex ; and it must be admitted that there have not been many vigorous attempts to tackle the problem. Apart from the simple fact, that evo- lutionist biology is still young, there are three reasons for the comparative silence in regard to the problem of sex. (1.) The first of these is the prevalent opinion, that when one has explained the utility or advantage of a fact, one has sufficiently accounted for it. This opinion rests on an accept- ance of the selection theory, and on a willingness to cover all questions of origin with a frank "ignoramus," or with the vague assumption of an indefinite variability which affords selection sufficient material to work upon. Our attempt is to push the postulate of indefinite variability as far back as possible, and to suggest a physiological reason why the varia- tions which have led to sex-dimorphism should have taken the lines which they presumably did. It is evident that a pre- occupation with the ulterior benefits of the existence of sex may somewhat obscure the question of how male and female have in reality come to be. (2.) A second reason for the comparative silence may be found in the fact that the problem remains insoluble until it is analysed into its component problems. The question of the 136 THE EVOLUTION OF SEk. origin of sex to a mind unprepared for the consideration of such a problem, suggests quite a number of difficulties, — -What is the import and origin of sexual reproduction (the setting apart of special cells) ? what is the meaning and beginning of fertilisation (the interdependence and union of sex-cells)? what is the reason of the individual, male or female, sex in any one case (the determination of sex) ? and lastly, what is the nature and origin of the difference between male and female? — the question at present under discussion. For purposes of analysis, these questions must be kept distinct. (3.) A third reason why the problem of the origin of male and female has been so much shirked, why naturalists have beaten so much about the bush in seeking to solve it, is that in ordinary life, for various reasons, mainly false, it is customary to mark off the reproductive and sexual functions as facts altogether per se. Modesty defeats itself in pruriency, and good taste runs to the extreme of putting a premium upon ignorance. Now this reflects itself in biology. Reproduction and sex have been fenced off as facts by themselves ; they have been disassociated from the general physiology of the individual and the species. Hence the origin of sex has been involved in special mystery and difficulty, because it has not been recognised that the variation which first gave rise to the difference between male and female, must have been a variation only accenting in degree what might be traced universally. § 4. Nature of Sex as seen in its Origin among Plants. — In tracing the origin of sex, we would wish to guard against any impression of having consciously or unconsciously arranged our facts in the light of the theory we hold. Hence we prefer to follow some accessible account, taken essentially from the morphological point of view. We shall follow Professor Vines in his article "Reproduction — Vegetable," in the Encyclopedia Brila?inica, at each stage, however, endeavouring to interpret the facts, physiologically, in the light of protoplasmic pro- cesses. (1.) The simple alga, Protococcus, common on tree-stems, in pools, wells, and the like— reproduces itself in a simple fashion. The cell divides into a number of equal units or spores; these are set free, are mobile for a while, eventually come to rest, and develop to the normal size. A hint, however, of the beginning of a difference is seen when the cell occasionally divides into a larger number of smaller spores. These, however, show no difference in history. They settle down, and develop just like their more THEORY OF SEX— ITS NATURE AND ORIGIN, I37 richly dowered neighbours. We find here the occurrence of units of smaller size, that is to say, less predominantly anabolic, but still these are able to develop independently. (2.) In a higher alga, Ulotkrix — one of the series known as Confervse — both large and small reproductive cells are developed. The large ones develop always of themselves, and so may the smaller forms. But the smaller forms may also unite in pairs, and then start a new plant from the double capital thus attained. When one of the smaller cells develops by itself, the result, in some cases at least, is a weakly plant. They have what Professor Vines calls an "imperfect sexuality," for while they are in part dependent upon union with other cells, they are not wholly so. They are anabolic enough, we may say, sometimes to develop independently, but often they are individually too katabolic for anything but weak independent development. In uniting, however, in mutual nutrition, they are strong. The student will already see the relative femaleness of the large units, the maleness of their smaller neighbours. (3.) A third stage is reached in another alga, Ectocarpus, which is peculiarly instructive. This may separate off large cells which develop by themselves like parthenogenetic ova. From other parts of the plant smaller units are liberated, which generally, though not yet invariably, unite with one another before developing. But between these smaller units a most important physiological difference has been observed by Berthold. Some soon come to rest and settle down, and with these their more energetic neighbours by-and-by unite. We have here a very distinct beginning of the distinction between male and female elements. The comparatively sluggish, more nutritive, preponderatingly anabolic cells, which soon settle down — are female ; the more mobile, finally more exhausted and emphatically katabolic cells — are male. As Vines says, " the one is passive, the other active; the former is to be regarded as the female, and the latter as the male reproductive cell." (4.) Further, in another alga, Cutleria, the differentiation may be traced. Two kinds of units result, which must unite with one another if development is to take place, but these units arise from perfectly distinct sources in the parent plant. The larger less mobile cells, which soon come to rest, are fertilised by the smaller more active units. The more anabolic or female cells are fertilised by the more katabolic or male cells, which have now gone too far for the possibility of independent develop- ment. (5.) To complete the series, we may simply mention such a case as that to which we shall presently return, — those forms of Volvox, where an entire colony of cells produces either female or male elements, thus repre- senting the beginning of an entirely unisexual many-celled organism. While the above cases also involve the problem of the origin of fertilisation, which is left over for the present, they confirm our conclusion that relative predominance of kata- bolism or anabolism is the characteristic of male or female respectively. § 5. Nature of Sex as seen in Origin among Animals. — Among the Protozoa also, we can trace the beginnings of the 13^ THE EVOLUTION Of SEX. same "dimorphism" between male and female. A union between similar cells is of course frequent, but that is not at present to the point. What we refer to are the numerous cases, especially among flagellate and Vorticella-like infusorians, where the two individuals which unite are quite unlike one another both in form and history. " There can be no doubt," Hatchett Jackson remarks, "that the process is essentially a sexual one; when the individuals are invariably different, there is no reason why the terms male and female should not be applied to them." In some cases we find as before that a small active katabolic unit combines with a larger, more passive, and anabolic individual. In the bell-animalcule ( Vorticelld), so common on the water-plants of our ponds, a minute free-swimming unit, formed as one of the results of repeated division, unites with a stalked individual of the normal size. In the related Epistylis, Engelmann has described how an individual divides first of all into two cells. One of these remains as such (like an ovum), the other repeatedly divides (like a mother sperm-cell) into numerous minute units. One of these subsequently unites with the undivided cell, and Engelmann does not hesitate to call the different elements male and female. In some radiolarians (e.g., Collozouvi) dimorphic spores — large and small — have been described, although their history has not yet been fully traced. As another illustration, it will be instructive to select the case of Volvox. In this colonial organism, which is best regarded as a multicellular protist, the component cells are at first all alike. They are united by protoplasmic bridges, and simply form a vegetative colony. In favourable environmental conditions this state of affairs may persist, or be interrupted only by parthenogenetic multiplication. When nutrition is checked, however, sexual reproduction makes its appearance, and that in a manner which illustrates most instructively the differentiation of the two sets of elements. Some of the cells are seen differentiating at the expense of others, accumulating capital from their neighbours; and if their area of exploitation be sufficiently large, emphatically anabolic cells or ova result ; while if their area is reduced by the presence of numerous competitors struggling to become ova, the result is the forma- tion of smaller, less anabolic cells, which become ultimately male, segment into antherozoids, meantime losing their vegeta- THEORY OF SEX — ITS NATURE AND ORIGIN. 139 tive greenness and becoming yellow. In some species, distinct colonies may, in the same way, become predominantly anabolic or katabolic, and be distinguished as completely female or male colonies. Thus, again, we reach the conclusion, of a predominant anabolism effecting the differentiation of female elements, and of katabolism as characteristic of the male. § 6. Conclusion. — In conclusion,, in defiance of Dr Minot's dictum, that "such speculation passes far beyond the present possibilities of science," we believe that the consideration (a) ' u[ 'wmM^^ Voluox glolator, a colonial Alga or Infusorian, showing the ordinary cells (c) that make up the colony (or body), and the special reproductive cells (a, &), both male and female. — After Cohn. of the characteristics of the sex-elements, alike in history, as Minot himself emphasises, and in their finished form, (b) of the incipient sex dimorphism seen among the simplest plants and animals, (c) of phenomena, both normal and pathological, in the sexual tissues and organs, (d) of the established facts in regard to the determination of sex (chap. 4), and (e) of the structural and functional, primary and secondary characteristics of the sexes (chap. 2 and passim) — all lead to the conclusion, that the female is the outcome and expression of relatively 140. THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. preponderant anabolism, and the male of relatively pre- dominant katabolism. Corroborations will gradually appear in the succeeding sections, as we discuss fertilisation, partheno- genesis, or special facts like menstruation and lactation. The late Mr G. J. Romanes criticised our thesis as a mere re-statement of the facts of sexual dimorphism without any explanation of them. But no other course is open to such inquiries but that of re stating. Our whole point is that of re-stating the idea of dimorphism in protoplasmic terms, at a deeper level of analysis than heretofore, in kinetic terms instead of static ones, and in such a way that the origin and evolution of sex are seen to be not phenomena per se, specialised, as naturalists have commonly thought, from the rest of the organism, but congruent with the origin and evolution of other organic differences. From another point of view, we may say that we are seeking to re-state the phenomena of sex by a deeper recognition of the unity of the organism, and of organisms. THEORY OF SEX — ITS NATURE AND ORIGIN. 141 SUMMARY. 1. Suggested theories of the nature of male and female; their number and vagueness. Three recent developments — (a) Rolph's penetrating sug- gestion of more nutritive females, less nutritive males; {d) Minot's theory of the differentiation of both kinds of sex cells from a primitive hermaphro- ditism ; {c) the conclusion of Brooks, that the males are more variable, arid alone transmit new variations. 2. Nature of sex seen in its essence in the sex-cells. The fundamental protoplasmic antithesis illustrated in the Protozoa, in the cells of higher animals, in life-histories. The conception of a cell-cycle. The physio- logical import of this, — the protoplasmic possibilities, preponderant ana- bolism, predominant katabolism, and a relative equilibrium. The anabolic character of the ova. The katabolic character of the sperms. 3. The problem of the origin of sex, so little tackled, because of (a) the logical sufficiency of the selection theory and pre-occupation with inquiries as to the utilitarian justification of the facts, (b) the number of separate problems involved, (it) the isolation of sex and reproduction from the general life of the organism and species. 4. A series from simple plants, showing the gradual appearance of dimorphic sex-cells, with the physiological interpretation thereof. The dimorphism is the result of relatively preponderant katabolism and ana- bolism, and this is the origin of male and female. 5. Illustrations of incipient dimorphism or sex among the Protozoa. Special reference to the case of Volvox. 6. General conclusion, — (a) from the sex-cells, (b) from incipient sex, [c) from organs and tissues, (d) from the determination of sex, (e) from the characters of the sexes, — that male and female are the resulls and expres- sions of relatively predominant katabolism and anabolism respectively. LITERATURE. Balbiani. — Lecons sur la generation des vertebres. Paris, 1879. Brooks, W. K.— The Law of Heredity. Baltimore, 1883. Dangeard, P. A. — Theorie de la Sexualite. Le Botaniste, Serie VI., 1898. ElGENMANN, C. H. — Sex-differentiation in the viviparous Teleost Cyma- togaster. Arch. Entwickelungsmechamk., IV., 1896, pp. 125-179, 6 pis., I fig. Geddes, P. — Op. ciL, especially "Theory of Growth, Reproduction, Sex, and Heredity," Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1886; and Article "Sex," Encyc. Brit., also "Restatement of Cell Theory," Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1883-84. HARTOG, M. — Some Problems of Reproduction. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., XXXIII., 1891, pp. 1-70. Haycraft, J. B.— The R61e of Sex. Natural Science, VII., 1890. Klebs, G. — Ueber einige Probleme der Physiologie der Eortpflanzung. Jena, 1895, 26 pp. Die Bedingungen der Fortpflanzung bei einigen Algen und Pilzen. Jena, 1896. I4 2 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. Lendl, A. — Hypothese iiber die Entstehung von Soma- und Propagation- zellen. 8vo. Berlin, 1889, 78 pp., 16 figs. Lignier, O. — Sur l'origine de la Generation et celle de la Sexualite. Miscellanees Biologiques Dediees au Prof. A. Giard. Paris, 1889, pp. 396-401. Maupas, E. — La Rajeunissement Karyogamique chez le Cilies. Arch. Zool. Expe"r., VII., 1889. Minot, C. S.— Theorie der Genoblasten. Biol. Centralbl., II., p. 365. Ueber Vererbung und Verjiingung. Biol. Centralbl., XV., 1895, pp. 571-87. Nussbaum, M. — Znr Differenzirung des Geschlechts im Thierreich. Arch. Mikr. Anat., XVIII., 1880. Rolph, W. H.— Biologische Probleme. Leipzig, 1884. Romanes, G. J. — Darwin and after Darwin. 1895-98. Ryder, J. A. — The Origin of Sex through Cumulative Integration, and the Relation of Sexuality to the Genesis of Species. Amer. Philos. Soc. , XXVIII., 1890, pp. 109-159. SACHS, J — Text-book of Botany, edit, by Vines, second edition, 1882; and Physiology of Plants, translated by Marshall Ward, 1887. Vines, S. H. — Physiology of Plants, 1886; article "Reproduction — Vegetable," Encyc. Brit. Wkismann, A. — Op. cil. BOOK III. PROCESSES OF REPRODUCTION. CHAPTER XI. Sexual Reproduction. § i. Different Modes of Reproduction. — It is well known that a starfish deprived of an arm can replace this by a fresh growth; that crabs can renew the great claws which they have lost in fighting; and that, even as high up as the lizards, the loss of part of a leg or a tail can be made good. In a great variety of cases, but decreasingly as we ascend from lower to higher organisms, there is reparation of external injuries. Generally speaking, the facts bear out Lessona's generalisation that re- generative processes are adaptive, occurring in those animals and in those parts of animals in which mutilation tends in the natural course of life to be frequent. Now this "regenera- tion," as it is called, is in a certain degree a process of repro- duction. By continuous growth the cells of a persistent stump are able to reproduce the entire member. We know too that a sponge, a hydra, or a sea-anemone may be cut into pieces, with the result that each fragment grows into a new organism. The same is done with many plants; and though these multi- plications are artificial, they illustrate what Spencer and Haeckel said long ago, that reproduction is but more or less discon- tinuous growth. So again, we pass onwards insensibly from cases of continuous budding, as in sponge or rose-bush, to discontinuous budding in hydra, zoophyte, and tiger-lily, where the offspring, vegetatively produced, are sooner or later set free. Similarly in the Protozoa, an almost mechanical breakage begins the series. This becomes more definite, in the production of several buds at once, or of only one. Budding leads on to ordinary division, both multiple and binary: while finally, in colonial forms, the liberation of special reproductive units may be observed. § 2. Facts involved in Sexual Reproduction. — It is neces- sary, at the outset, to be quite clear as to the occurrence of several distinct facts in any ordinary case of sexual reproduction 146 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. among many-celled organisms. (1.) There is, first of all, the fact that special reproductive cells are present in more or less marked contrast to the ordinary cells making up the body. To this antithesis we have already given due prominence. (2.) Then there is the further fact, that these special reproductive cells are dimorphic; that they, and the organisms which pro- duce them, are distinguishable as male and female. This has been the main theme of the two preceding books. (3.) Lastly, we have to recognise that these dimorphic sex-cells are mutually dependent, — that if the egg-cell is to develop into an organism, it must first be fertilised by a male element. On the facts of fertilisation, therefore, as observed in plants and animals, attention must now be concentrated. § 3. Fertilisation in Plants. — "The Newly Discovered Secret of Nature in the Structure and Fertilisation of Flowers," so ran the title of a work published by Conrad Sprengel in 1793, embodying his pioneer investigations on a now familiar field. Though not indeed the first to point out the importance of insects in relation to fertilisation, — for that honour appears to belong to Kolreuter (1761), — Sprengel laid sure foundations, now somewhat hidden by the superstructure which Darwin and others have built. To Sprengel's eyes, the many ways in which the nectar is protected from rain seemed full of "intention." He recognised in the markings of the petals illumined finger- posts to lead insects to the hidden hoards; and he further demonstrated that in some bisexual flowers it was physically impossible for the pollen from the stamens to pass to the tips of the carpels. His general conclusion, freely stated, was, that " since a large number of flowers have the sexes separate, and probably at least as many hermaphrodites have the stamens and carpels ripening at different times, nature appears to have designed that no flower shall be fertilised by its own pollen." A few years later (1799), Andrew Knight maintained that no hermaphrodite flower fertilises itself for a perpetuity of genera- tions. Sprengel's secret of nature had, however, to be set forth afresh by Darwin, who, in his " Fertilisation of Orchids '"' (1862), and "Effects of Cross- and Self-Fertilisation" (1876), has not only shown, with great wealth of illustration, the mani- fold devices for ensuring that insects unconsciously carry the fertilising pollen from one flower to another, but has also emphasised the advantage of cross-fertilisation for the health SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 147 of the species "Nature tells us," he says, "in the most emphatic manner that she abhors perpetual self-fertilisation." Hildebrand, Hermann Miiller, Delpino, and others, have, with consummate patience of observation, further traced out the secrets of nature in this relation; and the student may be referred to D'Arcy Thompson's valuable edition of Muller's " Fertilisation of Flowers," Sir John Lubbock's " Flowers in Relation to Insects," the classic works of Darwin, and P. Knuth's "Handbuch der Bliitenbiologie," 2 vols., Leipzig, 1892. Reference must, however, also be made to Meehan's protest (see pp. 8o, 81), that self-fertilisation is neither so rare nor so "abhorrent " as is generally believed. In a great number of cases, cross-fertilisation by means of insects does occur; in many it must occur. In another by no Bees visiting White Deadnettle (B), and Bioom (A). means small set of flowering plants, — usually with inconspicuous blossoms, — the fertilising gold dust is borne by the wind, and falls, like the golden shower on Danae, upon adjacent flowers. In many hermaphrodite flowers, again, self-fertilisation does certainly take place; in some this is necessarily so. Indubi- table self-fertilisation occurs in the small degenerate unopening (cleistogamous) flowers of some plants, such as species of balsam, deadnettle, pansy, &c. These occur along with ordinary flowers, and, curiously enough, are sometimes more fertile than they. In most of the lower plants, the male elements are minute, and actively mobile. They find their way through the water, or along capillary spaces between the leaves, to the passive female cells. In some cases there is a curvature of the male 148 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. organ towards an adjacent female organ, apparently in obedi- ence to chemical or physical attraction. Even here close fertilisation seems exceptional, and is often impossible. So far, however, only the external aspect of the process. So long ago as 1694, Camerarius showed that if the male flowers of hemp, maize, and other plants were removed, the female flowers bore no seeds, or at least no fertile ones. In 1704, E. F. Geoffroy castrated certain plants by removing the stamens, and noted that they remained barren. " Mirandum sane," he wrote, "quam similem servet natura cunctis in viventibus generandis harmoniam." Reasonable as this now appears to us, the fundamental fact was not only slowly recog- ■ nised, but on into the present century there were found A, Enlarged section of ripe Anther (fi), liberating pollen {a). B, Diagrammatic section of a Flower, showing pistil (c), — receiving stigma, conducting style, ovary with seed id) ; the stamens (b) with pollen. C, The Pollen-tube (a) growing down to the ovule (d) and female cell (/). The pollen-grain ia here represented as distinctly two-celled. naturalists who strongly opposed it, and denied the sexuality of plants altogether. In 1830, however, Amici made a great step. He traced the pollen-grain from its lighting on the carpel tip down into the recesses of the ovule. Schleiden, whose name is so closely associated with the founding of the "cell theory," soon confirmed Amici's observation, but in doing so went unfortunately much too far. Not only did the pollen-grain send its tube into the ovule, but there, according to Schleiden, it gave origin to the future embryo. This opinion, which, as Heyer observes, made the male element really female, was obviously parallel to that of the zoologists who found in the "sperm -animalcule" the miniature embryo. The view of SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 1 49 Camerarius and Amici of course prevailed ; and we now know not only the fact that the pollen-grain is a male element which unites in fertilisation with a female cell, but, thanks especially to Strasburger, much about the intimate nature of the process. In the last century, Millington emphasised the difference between male and female flowers, and we can trace the influence of this discovery in Erasmus Darwin's "Loves of the Plants," In the last few decennia, it has been shown, for many of the lower plants, that fertilisation essentially involves the union of the nuclei of male and female cells. By analogy the same was believed to be true of higher plants, but direct demonstration has only recently been forthcoming. Strasburger has followed the whole history of the pollen-grain, from the anther of the stamen to the embryo-sac of the carpel; and though some details still remain obscure, his researches have undoubtedly succeeded in elucidating the essential facts in the process. He shows how the pollen-grain divides into a vegetative and a generative cell, of which only the latter is directly important in fertilisation. The generative cell, which consists like the sperm mostly of nucleus with very little directly associated cell-substance, itself divides to form two (or even more) generative nuclei. One of these passes from the pollen-tube to enter into close union with the nucleus of the female cell, with which it fuses to form the double nucleus ruling the forthcoming develop- ment. Exceptionally the other generative nucleus may also unite with the nucleus of the egg-cell, but this is almost as rare as "polyspermy" among animals. According to Strasburger, the cell-substance of the pollen-grain or pollen-tube which sur- rounds the nucleus has no direct influence in the essential act. Fertilisation is a union of two nuclei, "the cell-substance of the pollen-tube is only the vehicle." He confirms the observations of Pfeffer, as to the reality of an osmotic attraction between at least the surroundings of the two essential elements, in accord- ance with which the pollen-tube bearing the generative nucleus is marvellously guided to its destination. The differentiation of the generative nucleus, in contrast to the more vegetative, and the true nuclear union which forms the climax of fertilisa- tion, are two very important facts, showing the unity of the process not only in higher and lower plants but in all organisms. Although there are peculiarities distinguishing the processes 150 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. of maturation and fertilisation in plants from those observed in animals, it is impossible to deny the essential parallelism. A discussion of this would lead us into technical details, which cannot be profitably described without abundant figures, but we may refer, for instance, to a comparative survey by Professor V. Haecker ("Biol. Centralblatt," xvii., 1897, pp. 689-705, 721-745, 40 figs.). One of the most striking botanical dis- coveries of recent years is the fact demonstrated by Hirase and Ikeno, that in the Ginkho (Salisburia adiantifolia), and in Cycas revohita, — gymnosperm flowering plants belonging to the family of Cycads, — the male nuclei issue from the pollen- tube as motile spermatozoa or antherozoids. Webber has also announced a similar discovery in the case of Zamia integrifolia. § 4. Fertilisation in Animals.— That the sperms are essential to fertilisation was a conclusion by no means recognised when those elements were first seen. Gradually, however, the fact was demonstrated, both by experiment and observation. Jacobi (1764) artificially fertilised the ova of salmon and trout with the milt of these forms, and somewhat later the Abbe" Spallan- zani extended these experiments to frogs and even higher animals. Even he, however, believed that the seminal fluid was the essential factor, not the contained spermatozoa. Through the experiments of Prevost and Dumas (1824), Leuckart (1849), and others, attention was directed to the real import of the sperms, which Kolliker referred to their cellular origin in the testes. The presence of the sperm within the ovum was observed in the rabbit ovum by Martin Barry in 1843; by Warneck, in 1850, for the water-snail, a fact con- firmed about ten years afterwards by Bischoff and Meissner; in the frog ovum by Newport (1854); and in successive years it was gradually recognised in a great variety of animals. The adaptations which secure that the sperms shall reach the ova are very varied. Sometimes it seems almost a matter of chance, for the sperms from adjacent males may simply be washed into the female, as in sponges and bivalves, with the nutritive water-currents. In other cases, especially well seen in most fishes, the female deposits her unfertilised ova in the water; the male follows and covers them with spermatozoa. Many may have watched from a bridge the female salmon ploughing along the gravelly river bed depositing her ova, careful to secure a suitable ground, yet not disturbing the already laid eggs of her neighbours. Meanwhile she is attended SteXuAL repr6duction. i 5 J: by her (frequently much smaller) mate, who deposits milt upon the ova. In the frog, again, the eggs are fertilised externally by the male just as they leave the body of his embraced mate. Or it may be that the sperms are lodged in special packets, which are taken up by the female in most of the newts, sur- rounded with one of the male -arms in many cuttle-fishes, or passed from one of the spider's palps to the female aperture. In the majority of animals, e.g., insects and higher vertebrates, copulation occurs, and the sperms pass from the male directly to the female. Even then the history is very varied. They may pass into special receptacles, as in insects, to be used as occasion demands ; or, in higher animals, they may with persistent locomotor energy work their way up the female ducts. There they may soon meet and fertilise ova which have been liberated from the ovary; or may persist, as we noticed, for a prolonged period ; or may eventually perish. When the sperms have come, in any of these varied ways, into close proximity to the ovum, there is every reason to believe that a strong osmotic attraction is set up between the two kinds of elements. We have often suspected that the approach of the conjugating cells of two Spirogyra filaments might be directed along the line of an osmotic current; and although we must confess that perhaps somewhat rough evaporations, performed a few summers ago, gave no positive confirmation to the idea that glucose or the like might be present in appreciable quantity in the water, a recent observer, we are glad to see, claims to have been more fortunate. The spermatozoa, which seem so well to deserve Rolph's epithet of "starved," appear to be powerfully drawn to the well-nourished ovum, and the latter frequently rises to meet the sperm in a small " attractive cone." Often, however, there is an obstacle in the way of entrance in the form of the egg-shell, which may be penetrable only at one spot, well called the micropyle. Dewitz has made the interesting observa- tion that round the egg-shells of the cockroach ova, the sperms move in regular circles of ever-varying orbit; and points out that thus, sooner or later, a sperm must hit upon the entrance. He showed that this was a characteristic motion of these elements on smooth spheres, for round empty egg-shells or on similar vesicles they moved in an equally orderly and systematic fashion. The persistence with which the spermatozoa often force their 152 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. way to the ova makes it impossible to doubt the reality of a strong chemotactic attraction. One illustration may suffice. According to Dr Sadone's account of the impregnation in the Rotifer Hydatina senta ("Zool. Anzeiger," xx., 1897, pp. 513-17), the spermatozoa of the male, which are injected into the body-cavity of the female, reach the totally enclosed eggs by boring through the thin membrane at a point where the mature ova are situated — a process not known in any other animals. The oval head of a spermatozoon was seen to attach itself to the membrane of the ovary, the tail continued to make lashing movements, the head was gradually forced through the membrane, and the tail followed, the whole process taking about ten minutes. It was till recently believed that more than one sperm might at least enter the ovum, but researches such as those of Hertwig and Fol have shown that when one sperm has found admittance, the way is usually barred against others. The micropyle may be blocked, or the surrounding membrane may be altered, or in other ways the ovum may exhibit what Whitman calls "self-regulating receptivity," so as to be no longer penetrable. We are safe in concluding, — that the ovum is usually receptive only to one sperm; that in most cases the entrance of more than one sperm is impossible; and that where " polyspermy " does occur, pathological development is at least often the result. It may be well to note that there are, as in plants, various steps in the process which is often roughly summed up in the one word — fertilisation. (1) There is the process by which the spermatozoa are brought into general proximity to the ova. In higher animals this is best termed insemination, and is accomplished by copulation. (2) There is the approach of the spermatozoon to the ovum, but of this little is known. (3) There is fertilisation in the strict sense, — the intimate and orderly union of two sex -nuclei. What takes place before fertilisation is, as we have just seen, very varied indeed among animals ; what takes place after fertilisation is of course cell division, but that, though referable to certain great types, must necessarily be very diverse ; what takes place in the act of fertilisation, however, is always essentially the same. The head of the spermatozoon becomes the male nucleus (or pro-nucleus) of the fertilised ovum, entering into close association with the female nucleus. The latter, as we have SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 153 already noted, has had its own history; it is no longer the original ger- minal vesicle, nor usually like it in appearance, it is the germinal vesicle minus the quantity of nuclear substance given off in forming two polar globules. This female nucleus (or pro-nucleus, as it is generally called) comes into close association with the sperm or male-nucleus ; nor does it remain quite passive in the process, though the greater activity in bringing about the close association is certainly still exhibited by the male. Whit- man has recently emphasised the reality of an attractive influence between the pro-nuclei. Fusion of the pro-nuclei was observed so long ago as 1850 by Warneck in the pond-snail {Lymnaus). The result, however, appears to have been overlooked, till the same fact was reobserved in threadworm ova by Biitschli in 1874. Since that date the fact has been continuously studied. Some observers still doubt whether what can be accurately called fusion of nuclei ever occurs; and if fusion means inextric- able confounding and mixing up of the male and female nuclear elements, it is almost certain that such does not in any case happen. There is no doubt, however, that the two nuclei become very closely associated, and according to most observers a double unity is formed, in which the com- ponent nuclear elements from the two origins so diverse are united in perfectly orderly fashion. So exact, in fact, is this duality, that when the first division of the egg takes place, each of the two daughter-cells has in its nucleus half of the male and half of the female elements, and so on perhaps in after-stages. The object upon which the intimate phenomena of fertilisation have been most studied is the ovum of the threadworm (Ascaris mega/ocephala) which infests the horse. Since 1883 numerous important memoirs have dealt with this subject, and with the same material. The general results stand out clearly, though there remain not a few minor discrepancies. To one of these, now explained, we may briefly refer. According to Van Beneden, the normal ovum of the threadworm contained in its nucleus one chromatin element, and was fertilised by a sperm also with one chromatin element. Carnoy, however, described the normal ovum as containing two chromatin elements, and as fertilised by a sperm also with two. In view of the perfection with which both these investigators had unravelled the structure and behaviour of the nuclei, the discrepancy seemed serious enough. But Boveri has shown that both are right ; Van Beneden 's type occurs; Carnoy's type also occurs. Nay more, an ovum with one chromatin element seems to be always fertilised by a sperm with only one, while an ovum with two chromatin elements is fertilised by a sperm likewise with two. A few of the details may be summarised from the masterly researches of Boveri. The extrusion of the two polar cells from the ovum is in reality a double process of cell -division. The quantity of the nuclear substance in the germinal vesicle is thereby reduced, and the number of nuclear elements is also reduced to half the normal. Only one sperm penetrates the ovum, unless the latter be unhealthy; and with the entrance of the sperm the ovum undergoes a. simultaneous change, which excludes other male elements. Only the head or nuclear portion of the sperm is of real importance in the essential act of fertilisation ; the nutritive tail or cap simply dissolves away. After the sperm-nucleus has penetrated to the centre of the ovum, and after the extrusion of the polar bodies is quite completed, we have to deal with two nuclei, not only closely approximate in structure, but alike in further history. 154 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. In Carnoy's type, both male and female nuclei contain two chromatin elements, in the form of bent rods; and before union takes place, these undergo a marked modification, the same in both cases. Round the chro- matin rods vacuoles are formed, limiting them from the surrounding protoplasm; into these the rods send out anastomosing processes, after the fashion of little rhizopods ; gradually the rods thus resolve them- selves into a network, in the meshes of which minute "nucleoli" are also demonstrable. Diagram of the Process of Fertilisation, after Boverl. — a, female pro-nucleus; 6, polar bodies ; c, male nucleus ; d, sperm-cap ; ac, chromatin elements of united female and male nuclei {a and c) ; e, centrosomes ; /, archoplasmic threads. The two nuclei thus modified then unite, but that again so precisely, as Van Beneden especially has shown, that each forms half of that spindle figure which almost all nuclei take when about to divide. This double spindle figure is the "segmentation nucleus," which will presently divide into the two first daughter-nuclei of the ovum (see figs. AT. -X. ). It is not possible here to discuss certain intricate changes which take place meanwhile, not in the nuclei, but in the cell-substance of the ovum. Doth Van Beneden and Boveri have recently agreed on the existence of two SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. iS5 ■vi ac- M\ 'MiiW&^- MK MMmmmK 3m 111 ■ ■.. ■:-■ .- ; ^1P "Hg K ■r^HN, \ •■■■-'■•■- 1 56 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. "central corpuscles" (centrosomata) in the protoplasm. These serve as " points of insertion" for protoplasmic threads, which exert a " muscular action" upon the nuclear elements in the forthcoming division. Boveri has traced with great care the history of a special kind of protoplasm (what he calls the archoplasm), which has its centre in either "central corpuscle" (e), and sends out fibrils (f), which moor themselves to the nuclear ele- ments. The movements of the latter during the forthcoming first division of the ovum are directly referable to the antagonistic action of these fibrils, and thus we have hints of an intracellular muscularity. In the spindle the nuclear elements, still distinguishable in their orderly behaviour as male and female, eventually form what is known as the " equatorial plate " (VI.), lying across the centre of the spindle. This is a well-marked stage, and one characterised by apparent equilibrium. " It is the resting-stage par excellence in the life of the cell. Movement is at an end, a state of stability has set in, and this would continue ad infinitum, did not a factor, which hitherto has played no part, assert itself and bring about fresh movement. This new movement is the longitudinal division of the chromatin elements, an independent expression of life — indeed, a re- productive act — on the part of the nuclear elements." Of each longitudinally split chromosome one half moves or is moved towards the one centrosome, and the other half towards the other centro- some. After this apparently equal partition a nuclear reconstruction is gradually effected, and the ovum reaches the 2-cell stage. One marvellous fact, showing the closeness of union in fertilisation, may be briefly re -emphasised. In the double nucleus formed from the union of male and female nuclei, Van Beneden, Carnoy, and others, have shown that both constituents have an equal share. The one half is paternal, the other maternal, and this is true not only for Ascaris (Van Beneden) and other threadworms (Carnoy), but for representatives of other worm-types, ccelenterates, echinoderms, molluscs, and tunicates. In the division which forms the first two daughter- cells (IX., X.), half of each set of constituents goes to either cell, and the dualism is kept up. Furthermore, it is probable that of the chromatin loops observed in the division figure of a daughter-cell, half are derived from the male parent, and half from the female. The importance of this fact, in relation to the influence of both parents upon the offspring, is very obvious. One of the clearest of modern exponents, Professor E. B. Wilson, who has himself made important contributions to the subject, sums up the present-day view of the matter in the following sentences : — " From the mother comes in the main the cytoplasm of the embryonic body, which is the principal substratum of growth and differentiation. From both parents comes the hereditary basis or chromatin by which these pro- SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 1 57 cesses are controlled, and from which they receive the specific stamp of the race. From the father comes the centrosome to organise the machinery of mitotic division by which the egg splits up into the elements of the tissues and by which each of these elements receives its quota of the common heritage of chromatin. Huxley hit the mark two score years ago when he compared the organism to a web, of which the warp is derived from the female and the woof from the male. What has since been gained is the knowledge that this web is to be sought in the chromatic substance of the nuclei, and that the centrosome is the weaver at the loom." (See "The Cell in Development and Inheritance," 1896, p. 171.) The above short sketch will show how intricate, and yet at the same time how orderly, are the intimate processes of fer- tilisation. Variations do indeed occur, both in pathological and in apparently normal cases ; but a general constancy is now both clear and certain, not only for many different animals, but also to a certain extent, as Strasburger and others have shown, for plants. § 5- Fertilisation in Protozoa. — In the nascent sexual union observed in many Protozoa, considerable diversity obtains. The individuals which unite may be to all appearance similar (to which cases the term conjugation is generally applied), or they may be materially dimorphic, as in Vorlicella. The union may be permanent, when the two units fuse into one ; or it may only be temporary, during which an interchange of elements takes place. The union may be complete, as in the conjugation of two Gregarines, or partial, as in the slipper-animalcule, and between these may be placed the state of affairs observed in various species of bell-animalcule ( Vorticella), where the nuclei and the bulk of the smaller conjugate pass into the larger, leaving, however, shrivelled remains which are cast off. This, as described by Hs. Wallengren ("Biol. Centralblatt," xix., 1899, pp. 153-161, 3 figs.), shows that the distinction between total and partial conjugation is only one of -degree. In many cases the nuclear elements are seen to play an important part, disrupting and reconstructing during the process, while a genuine fusion of the two nuclei has also been observed in permanent conjugation. In regard to the interchange of elements, there is considerable diver- gence of observation. Joseph has noted what appears to be an interchange of protoplasm; Schneider has observed the exchange of nuclear elements; while Gruber and Maupas, and Joseph as well, have, in their studies on the union of ciliated infusorians, laid emphasis on an accessory nuclear body, generally known as the " micro-nucleus." This body lies by the side of the larger nucleus, and while the latter simply disrupts and dissolves away, or is extruded without playing any important part, the smaller micro-nucleus divides in a regular way, and with the results there is micro-nuclear inter- change between the two individuals. According to Maupas, who has investigated the subject in most detail, 158 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. the para- or micro-nucleus is a "hermaphrodite" sexual element, of sole importance in conjugation. The stages in the process of fertilisation are as follows : — (1.) The micro-nucleus increases in size. (2.) Division occurs until there are eight micro-nuclei. (3.) Of these eight, seven disappear. (4. ) The remaining one divides again, differentiating a male and female pro-nucleus. (5.) In the next stage, the male elements of the two individuals are exchanged, and the new male nucleus fuses with the original female portion. (6, 7-) In two following stages, the nuclear dualism characteristic of the ciliated infusorians is re-established. The old large nucleus (macro-nucleus) has broken up and been eliminated meanwhile. (8.) Finally, the individuals, separating from one another, reassume all their original organisation before beginning again to divide in the usual fashion. The union of the male and female nuclear elements in ciliate infusorians was admirably figured by Balbiani so long ago as 1858 ; and though he does not seem rightly to have interpreted what he observed in this particular case, he was right in his contention that sexual union and fertilisation really occurred in the Protozoa. Balbiani's view has been for long scouted, and yet, with renewed observation, naturalists have now come back to his con- clusion. Maupas willingly allows that Balbiani figured beautifully what he himself has since reobserved and interpreted. The phenomena described by Maupas, as summarised above, have been observed in towards a dozen ciliated infusorians, so that there is every reason to believe in their general occurrence. In three species of the slipper-animalcule (Paramecium), and in species of Stylonichia, Leu- cophrys, Euplotes, Onychodromus, Spirostomum, &c, the facts are as above stated. It is of interest to cite the facts in regard to the common bell-animalcule ( Vorlicella), because here the conjugating individuals are like ovum and sperm in more ways than one. In some species — e.g., V. monilata — the adult divides equally, to form two small individuals, which conjugate with those of normal size. In V. microstoma there is again division into two, but the products are of unequal size; one is much smaller than the other. In the nearly allied Carchesium polypinum, the divisions are equal, but they are repeated twice or thrice. The result in all cases is the production of minute individuals, which eventually attach themselves to adults of the normal size, first to the stalk, and then to the body. The accessory nuclear bodies divide as usual ; the large individual ceases to feed, and hermetic- ally closes its mouth, like an ovum when fertilised. The small individual is gradually absorbed by the larger, as sperm by ovum ; and in an intricate but orderly fashion a mixed nucleus results from the fusion of the micro- nuclear elements of the two. The adult then begins to feed, to divide, and so on, as usual. Here then there is (a) incipient dimorphism, (b) absorption of smaller by larger, and (c) intimate nuclear union, — facts which we have already emphasised in the fertilisation of multicellular animals. § 6. Origin of Fertilisation. — To understand the origin of the union of sex-cells, attention must still be concentrated on SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 1 59 the Protozoa. That fertilisation really occurs at that low level in a highly complex fashion, we have just seen. It is necessary, however, to note the steps which lead up to what Maupas and others have so patiently elucidated. (a) In the primitive life-cycle exhibited by Prototnyxa (see fig. at p. 129), the units which burst forth from the cyst sink down into tiny amcebse, and unite together in numbers to form a composite spreading mass of protoplasm, technically known as a Plasmodium. This is undoubtedly a very primitive union of cells, yet it occurs at very diverse levels in the organic series. It is more or less familiar in the "flowers of tan," one of the lowly Myxomycetes, where a nucleated mass of protoplasm, of composite origin, spreads over the bark in the tan-yard. The plasmodial union also occurs as a definite stage in the life- history of the primitive neighbours of Prototnyxa, the Monera of Haeckel. Pour the liquid contents or body-cavity fluid of a freshly-dredged and still actively living sea-urchin into a bowl; the cells which float in it, like blood-corpuscles in the blood, draw together in clotted masses. Watch the process under a microscope, and the formation of a plasmodium is seen. The dying cells fuse into composite masses, just like the units of Prototnyxa; and it is interesting to observe that, though they are dying, the union provokes a brief but intense renewal of amoeboid activity. To forestall our point, they as it were fertilise each other in articulo mortis. In spite of the objection of Michel and others, that such union, being pathological, is not comparable to the multiple conjugation normal to the myxomycete, we maintain the distinct analogy between the Plasmodium formation in Myxomycetes and that exhibited by the cells in the body-cavity fluid of many animals, and regard this as so much additional evidence of the profound unity of the normal and the pathological processes. Now it is from this primitive union of cells, as illustrated in the lowest organ- isms, that we start in explaining the origin of fertilisation. Just as the very beginning of reproduction seems almost like mechanical breakage, so the very beginning of fertilisation is found in the almost mechanical flowing together of exhausted cells. (0) Between this and the process usually described as con- jugation, there are some interesting links. Sometimes as many as three or four spores of lowly Algae club together, as if to gather .sufficient momentum to make a combined start in life. i6o THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. The young forms of the sun-animalcule (Adinosphcerium) usually unite in twos, but Gabriel has observed in some cases a multiple union. In another sun-animalcule (Adinophrys sol) two to thirty individuals may unite loosely in what is often called plastogamy, but close union (of nuclei) only occurs between two individuals. So in gregarines (common parasites in invertebrates), while the usual union is certainly dual, Gruber has again observed what may be termed multiple conjugation. Union of three has also been observed as an exception in Diagrammatic representation of the stages in the origin of fertilisation, — (I.) Plas- modium ; (II.) multiple conjugation ; (III.) ordinary conjugation ; (IV.) con- jugation of dimorphic cells ; (V.) fertilisa- tion of ovum by spermatozoon. several infusorians. The union of more than two may thus be interpreted as intermediate between the formation of plasmodia and the normal dual conjugation. (c) Conjugation of two similar unicellular organisms occurs, as we have seen, very generally in the Protozoa, and is also a common fact in the life-history of simple Algse. It is open to every one possessed of a microscope to observe what conjuga- tion means in such a common fresh-water alga as Spirogyra. Opposite cells of adjacent filaments are attracted to one another, and the contents of the one cell pass bodily over into the other. SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. ibi In the great majority of cases where conjugation occurs, the uniting cells are to all appearance similar, but it must be remembered that it does not follow from this that they are physiologically alike. (d) Both among plants and animals, all naturalists are agreed that it is impossible to draw any line between the con- jugation of similar and the union of more or less dimorphic elements. " This differentiation presents," Sachs says, " espe- cially in Algse, a most complete series of gradations between the conjugation of similar cells and the fertilisation of oospheres by antherozoids, any boundary line between these two processes being unnatural and artificial." The gradual appearance of Diagrammatic representation of the contrast between conjugation (horizontal line) and fertilisation (vertical line). dimorphism has been already noted in discussing the origin of sex, and need not be re-emphasised. (e) Lastly, in fertilisation among higher plants and animals, the two elements which unite are highly differentiated, alike in contrast to one another and in opposition to the general cells of the body. A consideration of the phenomena in loose protist colonies like Volvox or Amputtina, which suggest the bridge between unicellular and multicellular organisms, shows how gradually this latter contrast also may have been brought about. To sum up, the steps in the development of the process of fertilisation may be arranged in the following series :— (a) The formation of plasmodia. (b) Multiple conjugation. 1 62 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. (c) Conjugation of two similar cells. (d) Union of incipiently dimorphic cells. (e) Fertilisation by differentiated sex-elements. One difficulty must in fairness be allowed in connection with the hypothesis of deriving conjugation from plasmodial union. Some years ago, Sachs was inclined to regard the Plasmodium formation of Myxomycetes as a process of multiple conjugation, but he afterwards withdrew this mainly on the ground that the nuclei have not been shown to coalesce. Now there seems no result of studies on fertilisation more certain than that the union of nuclei is an essential fact, but in Plasmo- dium formation, such intimate association of nuclei cannot be asserted. The difficulty of making this a starting-point is thus at first sight considerable. Yet it must be observed, (i) that our knowledge of the nuclei in those lowly forms is still very inadequate j (2) that, according to Gruber, the behaviour of the nucleus is sometimes masked by the fact that, instead of existing as a discrete body in the cell, it lies diffusely in the protoplasm ; but especially (3) that it is quite consistent with the general evolutionary con- ception to suppose that the primitive union was of very much less definite character than that subsequently evolved. Even in conjugation nuclear union is not always clear. It is well known in the conjugation of Infusorians, but it has been very rarely proved in other Protozoa. It has been observed, however, in some cases, e.g., by Wolters, in the common Monocysiis of the earthworm, and by Schaudinn, in the sun- animalcule, Adinophrys sol. Rhumbler has made an elaborate study of the possible evolution of fertilisation-processes. He finds the first step in cytotropism, in which chemotropic substances are secreted between cells, and in this connection we must bear in mind the experiments of Klebs, which show that the addi- tion of various reagents to the culture-solution in which a simple Alga or Mould is living will determine the occurrence of sexual or asexual reproduction. The next step is plasto- gamy, — two naked cells become apposed and fuse. At a higher level, karyogamy is reached. ("Biol. Centralbl," xviii., 1898, pp. 21-26, 33-38, 69-86, IT3-130, 14 figs.). § 7. Hybridisation in Animals. — Many of the compound names of animals, such as leopard, point back to a once prevalent belief that animals of very different kinds might unite sexually and have fertile offspring. SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 1 63 Only to a very limited extent is such a notion justified. Every one is aware that by direct human control animals like horse and ass, dog and wolf, lion and tiger, hare and rabbit, canary and finch, pheasant and hen, goose and swan, have been successfully crossed. In nature, however, we know relatively little of the occurrence and results of any such hybridisation. It seems to occur in some fishes; different species of toad are often seen in sexual union; it is said to be not uncommon between various species of birds and insects. M. Andre Suchetet, after many years' study of hybridism in birds and mammals, stated the following provisional conclusions ( " Journ. de l'Anat. Physiol.," xxxiii., 1897, pp. 326-355): — (1) Cases of hybridism in mammals number about 93, of which 82 are (a) crosses of species of the same genus, and 11 are (b) doubtful cases of crosses between members of different genera. There is no instance" (c) of crossing between members of distinct families or widely-separated genera. Among birds, 262 cases are recorded, 178 of the first category (a), 68 of the second (b), and 16 (some doubtful) of the third (c). (2) Of the 82 crosses between mammals of distinct species but of the same genus, the great majority (62) resulted in sterile offspring. In about 12 cases, the offspring have proved fertile with one of the parent species or with a third species. In 7 or 8 cases the offspring have proved fertile inter se, sometimes for three or four generations. Among birds, in 178 crosses between members of distinct species but of the same genus, only 22 resulted in fertile offspring, S inter se, the others with the parent species, or with a third species, or with other hybrids. Of the 68 crosses between species of different genera but of the same family, only one had offspring fertile with one of the parent species — the male hybrid of Columba livia x Tnrtur tisorius was fertile with the female of the latter species. The female hybrid resulting from the same cross seemed sterile. In two other cases a hybrid of this category fertilised a third species ; in another case it was fertilised by this third species. (3) As to the causes of the sterility in the hybrid offspring, the repro- ductive organs are sometimes atrophied, in other cases the ducts are abnormal, but there remain many instances in regard to which we can only shroud our ignorance with the word " constitutional." In some cases hybridisation succeeds readily, in other cases it is very difficult to bring it about. Thus Mr H. M. Vernon found that in some Echinoderms — Sphtzrechinus and Strongylocentrolus lividus — hybridisation occurred very readily and was highly successful. In some nearly related frogs, on the other hand, it always fails. In certain cases the cause of the difficulty is almost mechanical ; thus Pfliiger showed that the spermatozoa of liana fusca, which have very pointed heads, thinner than those of related forms, can fertilise the eggs of nearly all other species {R. arvalis, R. escu- lenta, and Bufo communis), but the blunt, thick-headed spermatozoa of R. arvalis and R. escuienta cannot fertilise the eggs of any other species. On the other hand, Hertwig's experiments on sea-urchins point to the conclusion that the state of the egg is very important in determining whether the hybridising will succeed or not. Eggs in good condition resist the entrance of spermatozoa to which the stale ova prove receptive. It should also be noticed that fertilisation and segmentation may occur without further development. This was Bom's experience in many cases 164 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. with amphibians, and T. H. Morgan had the same result with the ova of a starfish fertilised by the spermatozoa of * sea-urchin ; segmentation pro- ceeded, a hybrid gastrula was formed, but no further progress was made. There is no doubt that at least many species-hybrids tend to sterility, but this is exhibited in varying degrees. The male mules are always sterile, but some say that the females may be successfully impregnated by horse or ass. In many cases hybrids are not fertile with one another, but remain so with the parent form. In a few cases the reproductive functions seem for a time at least to be exaggerated rather than diminished as the result of crossing. It seems also certain that while variety-hybrids are usually fertile, their constitution is often unstable. They are often very variable, and apt to die out, as has been repeatedly observed in the human species. The ill- natured saying, " God made the white man, God made the black man, the devil made the mulatto," refers to the frequently inconvenient variability of those variety-hybrids. It is impossible, however, to generalise this. All that can be said is that some cross-fertilisations are very disadvan- tageous, while others seem to be as markedly the reverse. Brooks has laid considerable emphasis on the variability of hybrids in connection with his theory of heredity. "Hybrids and mongrels," he says, " are highly variable, as we should expect from the fact that many of the cells of their bodies must be placed under unnatural conditions, and must therefore have a tendency to throw off gemmules. " " Hybrids, from forms which have been long cultivated or domesticated, are more variable than those from wild species or varieties, and the children of hybrids are more variable than the hybrids themselves." " But domesticated animals and plants live under unnatural conditions, and they are tfier eArg* more prolific of gemmules than wild species ; and as the body of a male hybrid is a new thing, the cells will be much more likely than those of th^p pure parent to throw off gemmules. The fact that variation is due to the. male influence, and that the action upon the male parentj>f unnatural or changed conditions results in the variability of the chilcT, is well shown by crossing the hybrid with the pure species ; for when the male hybrid is crossed with a pure female, the children are much more variable than those born from a hybrid mother by a pure father." It cannot be said, however, that the evidence is as yet sufficient to warrant these general conclusions. In successful hybridisation, three results are common :— (a) a blending of the parental characters, (£) more or less exclusive expression of the characters of one parent, and (c ) a form quite unlike either parent. What direction the new variation will take cannot be predicted, but in many cases the result is a re-appearance of the characters of an ancestral form. In some cases this may mean that latent characters which have for a time been unexpressed are permitted to develop j in other cases it may mean that a new permutation of qualities has independently reproduced an old pattern or combination. Herr von Guaita found that if the Japanese dancing mouse was crossed with an albino, the second generation consisted of grey mice like the wild forms. (" Ber. Nat. Ges. Freiburg," x., 1898, pp. 3I7-33 2 -) Professor Cossar Ewart took a pure white fantail cock-pigeon, which in colour had proved prepotent over a blue pouter, and paired it with a cross previously made between an "owl" and an " archangel," and the result SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 1 65 was a couple of fantail-owl-archangel crosses, one resembling the Shetland rock-pigeon and the other the blue rock of India. Again, a smooth-coated white rabbit, derived from an Angora and a smooth-coated white buck, was mated with a smooth-coated, almost white doe (grand-daughter of a Himalaya doe) ; and the result was that in a litter of three, one was the image of the mother, a second was an Angora, like the paternal grand- mother, and one was a Himalaya, like the maternal great-grandmother. For further details "The Penycuik Experiments" (1899) should be con- sulted. The hybrid offspring often resembles one of its parents much more than the other. Thus Standfuss found that in reciprocal crossing the male is able to transmit the characters of its species in a higher degree than the female. A reverse result is noted below. The relative maturity of the two sex-elements has been shown by Vernon to be of importance in the hybridisation of sea-urchins. The characters of the offspring incline to be those of the species whose elements were relatively the more mature when fertilisation occurred. Standfuss has also noted that the freshly hatched larva often closely resembles the female parent ; that with growth a resemblance to the male parent gradually increases; and that the final extent of approximation towards the male parent depends on the relative phylogenetic age of the two species, the older being able to transmit its characters, whether of structure or habit, better than the young. In pairing normal forms with varieties and local races, Standfuss found (1) that when the norm (" Grundart") is crossed with a gradually formed local race of the same species, the result is u series of intermediate forms ; but (2) that when the norm is crossed with a sporadic variety, the result in many cases is that the issue agrees either with the norm or with the sport, intermediate forms being absent. (" Handbuch der pal'aarktischen Gross- Schmetterlinge," 2nd ed., Jena, 1896.) In short, the result seems to depend on the issue of what may be called the germinal struggle between hereditary characters of varying strength. The results reached by Standfuss are not altogether corroborated by other workers. Thus. J. W. Tutt gives an account ("Trans. Entomological Society, London," 1898, pp. 17-42) of experiments made by Riding and Bacot in hybridising two allied species of Tephrosia — T. bistortata Goeze (crepuscularia auct.) and T. creptiscularia Hb. (biundularia auct.). The hybrids show all degrees between full fertility and complete sterility ; they may be fertile inter se and with the parent stock ; the phylogenetically older species is more dominant in stamping its characters on the progeny and the female parent more than the male ; a recently formed variety may be pre- potent over the type from which it has sprung. The re-crossing of a hybrid with one of the parent species produces offspring scarcely differing from that parent species ; the inbreeding of the same cross produces a large percent- age differing much from either parent form; the crossing of the hybrids obtained from original reciprocal crosses tends to produce a mixed progeny, some referable to known forms of the crossed species, others quite unlike anything ever obtained in nature. Henri Gadeau de Kerville calls attention to an interesting conclusion — requiring, however, to be more carefully substantiated — that the results of successful hybridisation are much oftener males than females, and that male offspring are more numerous in proportion to the specific distance 1 66 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. between the two parents ("Bull. Soc. Zool. France," xxiv., 1899, PP- 49-51). The early researches of Kolreuter (1761) gave a firm basis to the study of hybridisation among plants. The comparative easiness of experiment has advanced the botanical side of the subject to far greater certainty than the zoological conclusions can pretend to. Among plants, as we should expect from their greater vegetativeness, the fertility of hybrids seems frequently established. Knight, Gartner, Herbert, Wichura, and others, have brought together a great number of reliable observations, and the whole subject has been admirably discussed by Nageli. For a copious resume of the general results, for the most part after Nageli, the student may be referred to chap. vi. of Sachs' Text-book of Botany, while Wallace's "Darwinism" should be consulted for its rediscussion of hybri- disation in animals. § 8. Telegony. — The belief has been for long current among breeders that the effective impregnation of a female may influence not only the immediate offspring, but subsequent offspring by a different sire. It is said that a pure-bred bitch lined by a mongrel dog is thereby spoiled for future breed- ing. The supposed influence is technically called telegony, and the supposed facts are usually explained by supposing that the surplus sperms in the first impregnation exert an influence on the immature ova in the ovary, or by supposing (in mammals) that the mother is affected by her first offspring through the medium of the placenta. The first point, however, is to make sure that there are facts to be explained, and this seems very doubtful. What has been regarded as the influence of the first sire on the offspring of the same mother by a second sire may receive some other explanation, may be, for instance, an independent variation, or may be simply a reversion. Much, if not most, of the alleged evidence is anecdotal; and careful experiments made by Professor Cossar Ewart, on the lines of Lord Morton's famous case, have yielded no evidence of the reality of telegony. Dr Otto vom Rath has suggested (" Biol. Centralbl.," xviii., 1898, pp. 637-642) that the occurrence of badly-bred pups in a litter, which breeders regard as the result of telegony, may be accounted for by co-infcetation, in which case different sires are supposed to fertilise the ova which may be shed into the oviduct at intervals of several days. But this, again, requires further proof. SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 167 SUMMARV. 1. Reproduction is but more or less discontinuous growth, 2. Sexual reproduction normally implies (a) special reproductive cells, distinct from the body; (b) the dimorphism of these cells; (c) their physiological dependence, — the ovum being unproductive without the spermatozoon, and vice versA. 3. The discoveries of Camerarius, Amici, Kolreuter, Sprengel, and others, laid the foundations of our knowledge of sexual reproduction in plants. 4. The history of research on fertilisation in animals well illustrates the gradually increasing precision of scientific inquiry. 5. The conjugation processes seen in Protozoa are of much importance in suggesting the origin of differentiated fertilisation. 6. The origin of fertilisation may be traced through the following grades : — [a) plasmodial union, i,b) multiple conjugation, {c) ordinary conjugation, (d) union of dimorphic cells, (e) fertilisation of ovum by spermatozoon. 7 Both in plants and animals hybridisation is often successful, but the offspring frequently tend to be sterile. This, however, must not be exaggerated. 8. Telegony has not been demonstrated. LITERATURE. See the already noted works of Balfour, Van Beneden, Carnoy, Geddes, Haddon, Hensen, Hertwig, M'Kendrick, Sachs, Vines, and Wilson. For recent papers see Zoological Record, from 1886; and Journal of Royal Microscopical Society. For bibliography of hybridism in plants see M. Abbado in Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital., V., 1898, pp. 76-105, 265-303. Ackermann, K. — Die Thierbastarde. Ber. Verein Kassel., 1897, pp. 103-121. Born, G. — Beitrage zur Bastardirung zwischen den einheimischen Anuren- arten. Pfliiger's Archiv., XXXII., 1883, and Archiv. Mikr. Anat., XXVII., 1886. Ewart, J. C. — The Penycuik Experiments. 1899. Hartog, M. — Some Problems of Reproduction. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., 1891. JOHNSON. — The Plastogamy of Actinosphjerium. J. Morphol., IX., 189=;. K.LEBS, G. — Zur Physiologie der Fortpflanzung einiger I'ilze. Jahrb. wi«. Botanik, XXXIII., 1899. Knuth, P Handbuch der Bliitenbiologie. 1898, 3 vols. See especially Vol. I. for literature (from II. Midler to 1898), and for general discus- sion of pollination, cleistogamy, parthenogenesis, &c. Kohlbrugge, J. F. H. — Der Atavismus. Utrecht, 1897, 31 pp. Kohlwey, H. — Arten- und Rassenbildung. Eine Einiiihrung in das Gebiet der Tierzucht. Leipzig, 1897, 72 pp., 5 figs. 1 68 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. Mobius, M. — Beitrage zur Lehre von der Fortpflanzung der Gewachse. Jena, 1897, VI., and 212 pp., 36 figs. Morgan, T. H. — The Development of the Frog's Egg. New York, 1897, 192 pp., 51 figs, (with bibliography). Muller, H. — Fertilisation of Flowers. Translation by D'Arcy W. Thompson. London, 1883. Nussbaum, M. — Beitrage zur Lehre von der Fortpflanzung. Arch. Mikr. Anat., XLI., 1893, pp. 1 19-145. Pfluger, E. — Die Bastardzeugung bei den Batrachien. Pfliiger's Archiv., XXIX., 1882; cf. Pfluger and Smith, op. cit., XXXII., 1883. Reibmayer, Albert. — Inzucht und Vermischung beim Menschen. Leipzig und Wien, 1897, 268 pp. Reul. — Les Unions Consanguines ; Histoire de la Creation des Races Celebres. Ann. Med. Ve'terinaire, XLVI. , 1897, pp. 1-8 et seq, Rhumbler.— Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Rhizopoden. Zeitsch. f. wiss. Zool., LXI., 1895. Schaudinn, Fr. — Ueber die Copulation von Actinophrys sol. Sitzber. Akad. Preuss. Berlin, 1896, pp. 83-89, 6 figs. Standfuss, M. — Handbuch der palaearktischen Gross-Schmetterlinge (2nd ed.), Jena, 1896; cf. F. A. Dixey, Science Progress, VII., 1898, pp. 185-202. Suchetet, A. — Problemes hybridologiques. Journ. de l'Anat. Physiol., XXXIII., 1897, pp. 326-355- Des Hybrides a l'etat sauvage, Tome I. Oiseaux, 8 e . Paris, CLII., 1001 pp., 1897. Vernon, H. M. — P. Roy. Soc. London, LXIIL, 1898, pp. 228-231. Verworn, M. — Biologische Protisten-Studien. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., L., 1890. Wager, H. — The Sexuality of the Fungi. Annals of Botany, XIII., 1899, PP- 575-597- Ward, M. — On the Sexuality of the Fungi. Quart. Journ. Micr. Science, XXIV., 1884. Wolters, M. — Die Conjugation und Sporenbildung bei Gregarinen. Arch. Mikr. Anat., XXXVII., 1891. CHAPTER XII. Theory of Fertilisation. In his 49th Exercitation on the " efficient cause of the chicken," Harvey thus quaintly expresses what has always been, and still is, a baffling problem : — " Although it be a known thing subscribed by all, that the fcetus assumes its original and birth from the male and female, and consequently that the egge is produced by the cock and henne, and the chicken out of the egge, yet neither the schools of physicians nor Aristotle's discerning brain have disclosed the manner how the cock and its seed doth mint and coine the chicken out of the egge." § 1. Old Theories of Fertilisation. — (a) From Pythagoras and Aristotle on to the " Ovists," of whom we have already spoken, numerous naturalists have held the opinion that the ovum was the all-important element, which only required to be awakened to development by contact with the male fluid or male elements. It must be allowed, that while ova may exceptionally develop without sperms, the latter never come to anything apart from ova. (b) In contrast to the above opinion, we find ingenious thinkers, so widely separate in time as Democritus and Para- celsus, regarding the male fluid as very important, forestalling Buffon and Darwin in fact in considering it in a sense an extract or concentrated essence of the whole body. But it was only after the spermatozoa were themselves detected that their importance became unduly exaggerated, in the minds of those who seem almost to have been nicknamed "animalculists." It seems probable enough that Leeuwenhoek himself (1677) saw the spermatozoon entering the ovum, — he at least said that he did,— but that did not prevent him from ascribing to the male elements all the credit of development. This became, as we have seen, a favourite hypothesis, and imagination sup- plied more than modern magnifiers to those observers who 17° THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. detected in the spermatozoon the members and lineaments of the future organism. (c) The third opinion, that both elements are of essential and inseparable import, is obviously alone consistent with the facts. This view also has had its gradual development, only one phase of which need be noticed. Even after the nature of the spermatozoa as male-cells was recognised, that is to say, even since the middle of the nineteenth century, an old con- ception of the male influence lingered persistently. This namely, that contact was not essential, but that a " sort of contagion," a "breath or miasma," "a plastical vertue," " without touching at all, unless through the sides of many mediums," was sufficient to effect what we call fertilisation. The above expressions are used by Harvey, who further says, " this is agreed upon by universal consent, that all animals whatever, which arise from male and female, are generated by the coition of both sexes, and so begotten as it were per con- tagium aliquod." De Graaf attempted in vain to give more precision to this " contagion " in his theory of an " aura seminalis," or seminal breath which passed from the male fluid to the ovum. But the conception of an " aura " was only a verbal cloak for that absence of definite knowledge which the slow progress of observation still necessitated. The theory was partly strengthened by a number of erroneous observa- tions, which seemed to show that successful fertilisation could occur when the genital passages of the female were apparently blocked by malformation or disease. Spallanzani gave a death- blow to the theory of an " aura," by showing experimentally that contact of the male fluid with the ovum was absolutely necessary. Even he, however, went away from the true con- clusion, by maintaining that the fertile male fluid of toads was destitute of spermatozoa. That the above vague conceptions have been replaced by the certain conclusion, that intimate cellular union is the sine qua non of fertilisation, we have already emphasised. § 2. Modern Theories of Fertilisation — Morphological. — Recent investigators of the facts of fertilisation have generalised their results in different ways according to their dominant bias. Some mainly restrict themselves to stating the morphological facts, and to emphasising the relative importance of cell-sub- stance and of nuclei in the union ; others attack the deeper problem of the physiological import of the process, — a problem THEORY OF FERTILISATION. I71 the full solution of which is still remote; while others have confined themselves rather to discussing the uses of fertilisation in relation to the species. Some representative positions on each of these planes must be sketched ; and, first of all, the more morphological theories, and the very important question whether the union of nuclei is everything, or whether the union of cell-substance has also its import. (a) Heriwig , s View. — Professor O. Ilertwig, who was one of the first carefully to follow out the details of fertilisation in animals, thus sums up his " Theorie der BefruchHmg" : — "In fertilisation, distinctly demon- strable morphological processes occur. Of these the important and essen- tial one is the union of two sexually differentiated cell-nuclei, the female nucleus of the ovum and the male nucleus of the sperm. These contain the fertilising nuclear substance, which is an organised substance, and acts as such in the process. The female nuclear substance transmits the characters of the mother, the male nucleus those of the father, to the offspring." The nucleus is thus the essential element both in fertilisation and in inheritance. (b) Sirasbuiger's View. — What Hertwig maintains for animals, Stras- burger does for plants. "The process of fertilisation depends upon the union of the sperm nucleus with the nucleus of the egg-cell; the cell sub- stance (cytoplasm) does not share in the process." " The cell-substance of the pollen-grain is only the vehicle to conduct the generative-nucleus to its destination." It may become nutritive, he allows however, to the germ- rudiment. " Generally the uniting nuclei are almost perfectly alike," though there may be slight differences in the size of the nucleoli. " The two cell-nuclei do not differ in their nature, they are not sexually differen- tiated in the ways that the individuals are from which they originate. All sex-differentiations only serve to bring together the two nuclei essential to the sexual process." The opinions of these two authorities are certainly representative, and they both agree in emphasising that the nuclei are all-important, and that it does not matter much about the union of cell-substance. Some objections to this view must be noticed, (a) It is permissible to doubt whether the recent concentration of attention upon the nucleus has not led to some under-appreciation of the general protoplasm. In the permanent conjuga- tion of two cells, the entire contents of the two cells are obviously fused ; and even when the union is temporary, Joseph has observed what looks like an interchange of protoplasmic as well as of nuclear substance, (b) There are a few observers still, such as Nussbaum, who maintain that in fertilisation in animals the substance of the sperm is important as well as its nucleus, [c) Strasburger notes the minimal quantity of cell-substance so often present round the male nucleus, and urges that if it were im- portant there would surely be more of it. But it is quite conceivable that a minimal quantity of highly active protoplasm might have, like a ferment, a momentous influence on a large quantity of a different character, (a?) It is, moreover, a very probable view that cytoplasm and nucleus attain their full significance only in inter-relation, forming what has been called a "cell-firm." (e) Boveri made the delicate experiment of removing the nucleus from a sea-urchin ovum which he afterwards fertilised. Although 172 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. the ovum had therefore only paternal nuclear material it developed into a larva. More recently Delage has extended the experiments and has reared normal larvae of sea-urchin, worm (Lanice), and mollusc (Dentalium) from non-nucleated ovum-fragments which were successfully fertilised. He describes this remarkable phenomenon under the title of merogony. (/) The researches of Boveri and others show that the sperm brings with it into the ovum a protoplasmic centre — a " centrosome " — which appears to be of much importance in the preparation for division. In this preparation, according to Boveri, the "muscular fibrils " of a special kind of protoplasm (or archoplasm) literally move the nuclear elements. " The movement of the elements is wholly the result of the contraction of the attached fibrils, and the final arrangement of these nuclear elements in the ' equatorial plate ' is the result of the action of the archoplasmic sphere exerted through the fibrils." Now this specially active protoplasm has its centre in the two central corpuscles, each "ruling a sphere of archoplasm." There seems general agreement as to the fact that the sperm furnishes the centrosomes in at least the majority of cases, and there is no doubt that these minute bodies play a prominent part in the division which follows fertilisation. At this stage, then, it seems rash to deny that even the minimal cell-substance of the spermatozoon may, as well as its nucleus, have a momentous influence in fertilisation. § 3. Physiological Theories of Fertilisation. — The morpho- logical facts, established and verifiable by observation, form the basis from which to attack the deeper problem of the physiology of fertilisation. Here experiment is almost insuper- ably difficult; only a few incidental results are as yet available; the suggestions thrown out by various naturalists must there- fore be appreciated according to their consistence with the general principles of physiology, and with the general theory of sex and reproduction. To some they may still appear a page of probabilities. Sachs compares the action of the male element upon the egg-cell to that of a ferment. De Bary also suggests that pro- found chemical differences exist between the two elements. Very suggestive is the view of E.olph, who regarded the process as essentially one of mutual digestion. His vivid words well deserve quotation : — "Conjugation occurs when nutrition is diminished, whether this be due to want of light, or to the lowered temperature of autumn and winter, or to a reduction of the organisms to minimal size. It is a necessity for satisfaction, a gnawing hunger, which drives the animal to engulf its neighbour, to 'isophagy.' The process of conjugation is only a special form of nutrition, which occurs on a reduction of the nutritive income, or an increase of the nutritive needs, in consequence of the above-mentioned conditions. It is an 'isophagy,' which occurs in place of 'heterophagy.' The less nutritive, and therefore smaller, hungrier, and more mobile organism we call the male, — the more nutritive and usually relatively more THKORY OF FERTILISATION. 173 quiescent organism, the female. Therefore too is it, that the small starving male seeks out the large well-nourished female for purposes of conjugation, to which the latter, the larger and better nourished it is, is on its own motive less inclined." Cienkowski has also inclined to a similar view, regarding conjugation as equivalent to rapid assimilation. In Holothuria tubulosa and some other Echinoderms, N. Iwanzoff has observed ("Bull. Soc. Nat. Moscou," 1897, pp. 355-367, 1 pi.) that immature ova, after a certain stage, show great sexual attraction for spermatozoa, and emit many pseudopodia, while the mature ovum only emits one. But the spermatozoa absorbed by the immature ova are digested, which leads the author to the speculative suggestion that the process of maturation weakens the nutritive vitality of the ovum so that it is unable, fortunately, to digest the spermatozoon. Simon also seeks to establish the following among other vague con- clusions : — Sexuality has, he says, arisen twice (we should say much oftener), once among plants, again among Protozoa. Two similar cells unite "in order to reach the limit of their individuality." In both kingdoms the union is at first protective, though in a different fashion in the two cases. In the progressive differentiation, these two sex-cells are usually so con- structed that the loss of substance in the union is reduced to a minimum, hence the small mobile male and the large quiescent female cells. The union brings about a chemico-physical process, which makes the female cell capable of independent nutrition and growth, and evokes potential proper- ties into actual life. In marked contrast to Rolph's suggestion, and the view of all those who believe that the sex-cells are profoundly different, is the opinion maintained by Weismann. He denies that there is a dynamical action in fertilisation. The momentous effect is merely a restoration of the normal composition of the nucleus. "The physiological values of sperm and egg-cell are equal; they are as i : i. We can hardly ascribe to the body of the ovum a higher import than that of being the common nutritive basis for the two conjugating nuclei." The external differences which are so obvious are only important as means towards the conjugation of similar nuclei. " The germ-plasm in the male and female reproductive cells is identical." Previous to the essential moment of fertilisation, the germ-plasm is reduced in maturation. Development will not take place unless the loss be made good. This is what the sperm does in fertilisation. In short, to Weismann the process is quantitative rather than qualitative. This supposition appears to us to be open to criticism. (1.) That the nuclei are alone important in fertilisation, and that the cell substance is a mere adjunct, cannot be said to be proved, and we have already noted some of the facts which tell the other way. (2.) The structure of a cell is recognised by all to be an expression of its dominant protoplasmic pro- cesses. The sex-cells are usually highly dimorphic, and even Strasbnrger 174 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. allows that there may be minor differences in their nuclei, as well as the marked divergence in their cell -substance. The nucleus cannot be regarded as an isolated element, but as one which shares in the general life of the cell. We have already interpreted the differentiated male and female cells as respectively katabolic and anabolic, and see no reason for doubting, in spite of structural resemblance in the rough features of nuclei (all that we know), that this difference saturates through the elements. (3.) If the only important matter be the quantitative restoration of the original amount of germ-plasma in the female nucleus, it seems difficult to understand the phenomena of conjugation, whether permanent or transitory, from which we believe fertilisation to have originated. (4.) The occasional possibility of inducing division by replacing the sperms with other stimuli, seems to point to a dynamical or chemical action. Thus Loeb induced artificial parthenogenesis in sea-urchin ova by placing them for a couple of hours in sea-water, to which some magnesium chloride had been added. (S-) Delage's evidence that non-nucleated portions of ova may be readily fertilised and form normal larvae, strongly suggests that the mingling of heritable qualities, which is certainly one of the results of fertilisation, must be distinguished from the physiological stimulus to division. It is very desirable that the experiment which Fieri has begun of extracting a ferment (ovulase) from seminal matter arid using it as a fertilising stuff, should be confirmed or confiUed. It has been already noted, in regard to the origin of fertilisa- tion, that the almost mechanical flowing together of exhausted cells is connected by the stages of multiple conjugation with the ordinary form of the latter, while the respective differentia- tion of the two elements effects the transition to fertilisation proper. Historically, then, fertilisation may be compared to mutual digestion, and, though bound up with reproduction, it may have arisen from a nutritive want. With the differentiation of the elements on anabolic and katabolic lines, the nature of the fertilising act becomes more definite. The essentially katabolic male cell, getting rid of all accessory nutritive material contained in the sperm-cap and the like, brings to the ovum a supply of characteristic products which stimulate the latter to division. The profound chemical differences, surmised by some, are intelligible as the outcome of the predominant anabolism and katabolism in the two elements. The union of the two sets of products restores the normal balance and rhythm of cellular life. At the same time, it is of course certain that the spermatozoon is the bearer of the inheritable paternal characteristics. § 4. Uses of fertilisation to the Species. — Not a few natu- ralists have passed from the individual aspect of fertilisation to its general import in relation to the life of the species. Why THEORY OF FERTILISATION. 175 should fertilisation occur at all, if parthenogenesis in some cases works so well ? Part of this question is almost illegitimate, if the existence of male and female be, as we think, simply the expression of a more developed swing of "the organic see- saw" between anabolism and katabolism. The answers have, however, much interest, and are valuable, so long as they are not magnified so as to hide the deeper physiological problems lying below. The origin and physiological import of fertilisa- tion can never be explained by any elucidation of its subsequent advantagebusness. The two naturalists who have recently reached the most valuable results in regard to the results of fertilisation are Maupas and Weismann. This they have done by very different paths, — Maupas, in working out the details of conjugation in infusorians ; Weismann, in his wider studies on the problems of heredity and evolution. To Maupas, fertilisation is necessary to prevent the death of the species ; to Weismann, fertilisation is the ever-recurrent beginning of new vital changes, and the continual preservation at the same time of the relative con- stancy of the species. Several naturalists of the highest reputa- tion have regarded fertilisation as a process which supplied a fresh life-impulse to the species. Thus Galton has insisted, with much clearness and force, on the liability of asexual, or what he calls unisexual multiplication to end in degeneration or extinction, and on the necessity of double parentage for the preservation and progress of the species. Similarly, .Van Beneden, Biitschli, and Hensen have all spoken of the process as a rejuvenescence (rejeunissement, Verjiingung). The asexual process of ' cell-multiplication is limited; conjugation in lower, fertilisation in higher organisms supplies the recurrent impulse which keeps the life of the species young. According to Van Beneden, — " The faculty which cells possess of multiplying by division is limited. There comes a time when they can divide no further, unless they undergo rejuvenescence by fertilisation. In animals and plants, the only cells capable of being re- juvenesced are the eggs; the only cells capable of rejuvenescing these are the sperms. All the other parts of the individual are devoted to death. Fertilisation is the condition of the continuity of life. Par elle le geneVateur echappe a la mort." Hensen, in his admirable " Physiology of Reproduction," ex- presses the same when he says: — "By normal fertilisation, death is warded off (ferngehalten) from the germ and its 176 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. products.'-' Biitschli has interpreted conjugation in similar terms. Weismann quotes the three opinions just mentioned, and vigorously criticises them. He demands evidence for the limitation of asexual reproduction assumed above, and speaks of the "impossibility of proof." The whole "conception of rejuvenescence has something indefinite and misty about it." " How can one think that an infusorian, which by continued division has at length exhausted its reproductive capacity, will regain the same by uniting and fusing with another which has also lost its power of further division ? Twice nothing cannot give one; or if we assume that in each animal there persists only half the reproductive capacity, so that the two together would form one, this one can hardly call 'rejuvenescence.' It would be simply an addition, as is under other circumstances attained by simple growth, — that is, if we leave out of account what in my eyes is the most important moment in conjugation, viz., the mingling of two heredity-tendencies (Vererbungsten- denzen)." He sarcastically compares the two exhausted individuals to two exhausted rockets, which are supposed to rejuvenesce in mutually affording the constituents of nitro- glycerine. More forcibly he urges the difficulty suggested by continued parthenogenesis, — a difficulty which we shall after- wards have to discuss. "To the conception of rejuvenescence," he says, in conclusion, " I could only agree, if it were proved that multiplication by division can never, — not merely in certain conditions,— but never continue unlimitedly. This cannot, however, be proved, just as little as the reverse." But Weis- mann must surely admit that the demonstration of even some cases where species, normally reproducing asexually, come to an absolute standstill if conjugation be prevented, would give considerable strength to the interpretation of fertilisation as rejuvenescence. Maupas has given examples of such cases. The French observer has shown, as we have seen, that a process of fertilisation occurs in ciliated infusorians. By an elaborate process of nuclear division, disruption, elimination, interchange, union, and reconstruction, two " slipper animal- cules" fertilise one another. What is the meaning of all this? Each infusorian, after conjugation, proceeds to divide, but the results are to all appearance the same as it previously pro- duced. There is no special sexually produced generation. It has been often alleged that the subsequent dividing is THEORY OF FERTILISATION. 177 accelerated by conjugation; but Maupas finds that this is not so. The reverse in fact is true, — it is a loss of time. While a pair of infusorians (Onychod/omus grandis) were indulging in a single conjugation, another had become, by ordinary asexual division, the ancestor of from forty thousand to fifty thousand individuals. Moreover, the intense internal change preparatory to fer- tilisation, and the general inertia during subsequent reconstruc- tion, not only involve loss of time, but expose the infusorians to great risk. It seems then like a condition of danger and death rather than of multiplication and birth. The riddle was, in part at least, solved by a long series of careful observations. In November 1885, M. Maupas isolated an infusorian (Stylonichia pustulate?), and observed its genera- tions till March 1886. By that time there had been two hundred and fifteen generations produced by ordinary division, and since these lowly organisms do not conjugate with near relatives, there had, of course, been no sexual union. What was the result ? At the date referred to, the family was observed to have exhausted itself. The members, though not exactly old, were being born old. The asexual division came to a standstill, and the powers of nutrition were also lost. Meanwhile, however, several of the individuals, before the generations had exhausted themselves, had been removed to another basin, where they conjugated with unrelated forms of the same species. One of these was again isolated, and watched for five months. The usual number of successive generations occurred ; members removed at different stages were again observed to conjugate successfully with unrelated forms, and this was done on to the one hundred and thirtieth generation. After that, however, the family being again near its end, the removal was no longer any use. About the one hundred and eightieth generation, the strange sight was seen of individuals of the same family attempting to unite with one another. The results were, however, nil, and the con- jugates did not even recover from the effects of their forlorn hope. Without the normal sexual union, then, the family becomes senile. Powers of nutrition, division, and conjugation with unrelated forms, come to a standstill. The first symptom is decrease in size, which may go on till the individuals only 12 178 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. measure a quarter of their normal proportions. Various internal structures then follow suit, " until at last we get form- less abortions, incapable of living and reproducing them- selves." The nuclear changes are no less momentous. The important para- or micro-nucleus may partially or completely atrophy, and conjugation is thus fatally sterile. The larger nucleus may also become affected, " the chromatin gradually disappearing altogether." Physiologically too, the organisms become manifestly weaker, though there is what the author calls a " surexcitation sexuelle." Such senile decay of the individuals and of the isolated family inevitably ends in death. The general result is evident. Sexual union in those infu- sorians, dangerous perhaps for the individual life, — a loss of time so far as immediate multiplication is concerned, — is in a new sense necessary for the species. The life runs in cycles of asexual division, which are strictly limited. Conjugation with unrelated forms must occur, else the whole life ebbs. Without it, the Protozoa, which some have called "immortal," die a natural death. Conjugation is the necessary condition of their eternal youth and immortality. Even at this low level, only through the fire of love can the phcenix of the species renew its youth. The need of extreme carefulness is shown, however, by the somewhat discrepant results reached by D. Joukowsky ('* Verh. Nat. Med. Verein Heidelberg," vi., 1898, pp. 17-42). After five months' culture his colony of Paramecium caudalum showed no nuclear degeneration, but only a marked reduction of cilia and a consequent sluggishness. In P. putrinum effective conjugation between the descendants of one individual was ob- served, but the author admits the probability that this has its limits. In another infusorian, Pleurotricha lanceolata, over 458 generations were observed without the occurrence of degeneration, and Joukowsky supposes that degeneration depends not on the number of generations merely, but on the rapidity of their successive occurrence. At the beginning of this century, the too-much-forgotten biologist Treviranus directed attention to fertilisation as a source of variation, and his suggestion has been several times independently revised. Thus Brooks, to whose works we have repeatedly referred, has emphasised not only the importance of fertilisation as a source of progressive change, but further, that the male ele- ment is much the more important in this connection. Similarly, though on somewhat different lines, Weisrnann THEORY OF FERTILISATION. 1 79 suggested that the mingling of ni..'c and female germ-plasms was a source of those variations on which natural selection operates. " Sexual reproduction is well known to consist in the fusion of two contrasted reproductive cells, or perhaps even in the fusion of their nuclei alone. These reproductive cells contain the germinal material or germ plasm, and this again, in its specific molecular structure, is the bearer of the hereditary tendencies of the organisms from which the repro- ductive cells originate. Thus in sexual reproduction, two hereditary tendencies are in a sense intermingled. In this mingling, I see the cause of the hereditary individual char- acteristics; and in the production of these characters, the task of sexual reproduction. It has to supply the material for the individual differences from which selection produces new species." Few will be inclined to oppose the thesis that sexual union is productive of variation. To discuss the relations of this view to other theories of variation is beyond our present scope. Thus Weismann has suggested that germinal variations may also arise because of the reducing divisions which precede fertilisation or amphimixis, as he calls it, and furthermore through nutritive and other stimuli which operate through the body upon the germ-plasm. We should also mention Hatschek's suggestion that sexual reproduction is a remedy against the operation of injurious variations. We can readily imagine that the excess of some particular line of anabolic or katabolic differentiation may be neutralised through fertilisation, and it may be in this way that the pairing of diseased individuals is sometimes mercifully condoned by nature. Mobius may be cited here for his vigorous protest against the prevalent idea that continuous vegetative multiplication necessarily results in degeneration. He instances such cases as the banana and date palm, which are never reproduced sexually in cultivation, but it must be remembered that arti- ficial selection is here in operation, to sustain the standard. He admits, however, the advantages of sexual reproduction both in conserving the specific characters and in prompting new variations. ("Beitrage zur Lehre von der Fortpflanzung der Gewachse." Jena, 1897.) In regard to close in-breeding we have still much, need of experiment, but it seems fairly certain that with a healthy ISO THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. stock this may go far w J^ ; disadvantageous results. It seems rather to fix and suotfgthen desirable characteristics. On the other hand, if the stock be markedly tainted, the in- breeding is continued at the risk of degeneracy. Even when the stock is sound to start with, there seem to be limits to close in-breeding, as Vom Rath found in experi- ments with rats, and Von Guiata in experiments with mice. As many breeders have recorded, there is a tendency to debility, abnormality, and sterility. According to Reibmayr, the success of a human race is in part dependent on the alternation of periods of sustained in- breeding, which serve to " fix " racial characters, and periods of cross-breeding in which the advantages of "fresh blood" are secured. THEORY OF FERTILISATION. SUMMARY. i. Old theories of "ovists," " animalculists,'' and of the "aura seminalis. " 2. Modern morphological theories incline to lay the whole emphasis upon the nuclei. The conclusions of Hertwig and Slrasburger are strongly in favour of this view. The import of the centrosomes and general proto- plasm must not, however, be overlooked. Several facts suggest that the all-importance of the nuclei has been exaggerated. 3. Modern physiological theories of fertilisation are necessarily very tentative. Sachs compares it to fermentation; Rolf to mutual digestion. To Weismann, the process appears quantitative rather than qualitative. Suggestion that the male cell brings to the ovum a supply of characteristic chemical substances which act as a stimulus. 4. Uses of fertilisation to the species. Many regard fertilisation as a necessary rejuvenescence of the life of the species. Weismann criticises this view, but his criticism must be read in the light of the researches of Maupas, who has shown that without conjugation the members of an isolated family of infusorians eventually cease to feed and divide, passing through stages of degeneration and senility to extinction. In this case, conjugation is essential to the continued vitality of the species. According to Brooks and Weismann, fertilisation is an important source of variation. LITERATURE. Baillet. — Quelques mots sur les croisements dits au premier sang. Mem. Ac. Toulouse, V., 1893. Bos, J. Ritzema. — Untersuchungen iiber die Folgen der Zucht in engster Blutverwandtschaft. Biol. Centralbl., XIV., 1894, pp. 75-81. BOVERI, Th. — Befruchtung. Anatomische Ergebnisse, I., 1693, pp. 386- 485 ; and subsequent reports in the same Record. CoNKLiN, E. G. — The Fertilisation of the Ovum. Wood's Holl Bio- logical Lectures, II., 1894, pp. 15-35, I0 fig s - Hertwig, O. — Das Problem der Befruchtung, &c; Jenaische Zeitschrift fur Naturwissenschaften, XVIII., 1885. Klebs, G. — Ueber das Verhaltniss des mannlichen und weiblicheii Geschlechts in der Natur. Jena, 1894, 30 pp. , KCEHLER, R. — Pourquoi resemblons-nous a nos parents? Etude Physio- logique sur la fecondation, sa nature et son origine. Revue Philoso- phique, XXXV., 1893, pp. 337-386, 38 figs. Maupas, E. — Comptes Rendus, 1886, 1887; and Archives de Zoologie expdrimentale, 1888. REGNAULT, F. — Des effets de la consanguinite'. Rev. Scient., LI., 1893, pp. 232-6, 266-71. Rhumbi.er, L. — Zellleib, — Schalen- und Kern-Verschmelzungen bei den Rhizopoden und deren wahrscheinliche Beziehungen zu phylogene- tischen Vorstufen der Metazoenbefruchtung. Biol. Centralblat. , XVIII., 1898, pp. 21-26 el seq. 1 82 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. Schimkewitsch, W. — Zur Frage iiber die Inzestzueht. Biol. Central- blatt, XVI., 1896, pp. 177-181. Standfuss, M. — Handbuch der paloearctischcn Gross-Schmetterlinge, 2nd ed. Jena, 1895, 392 pp., 8 pis. Strasburger, E. — Neue Untersuchungen iiber den Befruchtungsvorgang bei den Phanerogamen, als Grundlage fur eine Theorie der Zeugung. Jena, 1884.. Wilson, E. B.— The Cell in Development and Inheritance. New York and London, 1896, 371 pp., 142 figs. Weismann, A. — Opp. cit., especially Die Pecleutung dtr sexuellen Fort- pflanzung fur die Seleklions-Theorie. Jena, 1886. CHAPTER XIII. Degenerate Sexual Reproduction or Parthenogenesis. § i. History of Discovery. — From very early times there appears to have been an impression, that in exceptional circumstances reproduction might occur without fertilisation. Even Aristotle gave reasons for believing that, without sexual union, the un- fertilised eggs of the honey-bee might give rise to perfect adults. We now know that he was right, in his conclusion at least, so far as the development of drones is concerned. In the early belief in Lucina situ concubitu, much that was erroneous was intermixed with a prevision of the truth; nor could we expect at an early date that asexual multiplication (i.e., apart from ova alto- gether) would be kept distinct from what we now mean by parthenogenesis, or the development of ova without union with sperms. In 1701, Albrecht observed that a female silkmoth, which had been isolated in a glass case, laid fertile eggs ; and though. this was for long discredited, the occasional partheno- genesis of this insect has been repeatedly confirmed by com- petent observers. In 1745, the ingenious Bonnet drew attention to what is now a very familiar fact, the successive generations of virgin plant-lice or Aphides. Throughout the summer, he observed the production of numerous generations of these little insects, all females, necessarily therefore all virgins, and yet fertile. So strange did the fact appear, that it was for long utterly dis- credited. Reaumur eluded the difficulty, by affirming that the Aphides were hermaphrodite ; but Dufour soon proved that this was erroneous, though he could only confess his ignorance in referring the phenomena to "spontaneous or equivocal gen- eration," in which "the act of impregnation was in no degree concerned." The facts, however, were repeatedly re-observed. Kirby and Spence admitted them as incontestable, but could regard them only as " one of the mysteries of the Creator, that human intellect cannot fully penetrate." 1 84 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX Meanwhile Schaffer had observed the occurrence of par- thenogenesis in minute aquatic crustaceans, the study of which has since shed some vivid light on the whole subject. Pastor Dzierzon had also clipped the wings of queen-bees, and in thus preventing their nuptial flight and impregnation, observed that the eggs they laid developed only into drones. The facts soon began to be recognised, extended, and thought over by naturalists of the standing of Owen (1843), Von Siebold (1856), and Leuckart (1858), whose conclusions have afforded a firm basis for the abundant subsequent observation and speculation on this interesting subject. § 2. Degiees of Parthenogenesis. — If we start then with Von Siebold's definition of parthenogenesis, as the power possessed by certain female animals of producing offspring without sexual union with a male, it will clear the ground to notice, in the first place, the numerous different degrees in which this develop- ment without fertilisation may occur. (a) Artificial Parthenogenesis. — There are a few curious observations which go to show that in exceptional circum- stances ova may develop when the male stimulus is replaced by some artificial reagent. These observations must still be taken cum grano satis, but they may be at least suggestive of further experiment. Dewitz observed unfertilised frog ova to undergo segmentation (sic) in corrosive sublimate solution. In some cases one division occurred, in others several; in some cases irregularly, in others normally. It happened both when the ova were left in the reagent, and when they were merely dipped and returned to water. The eggs experimented on were those of the two common frogs Rana fusca and R. escuknta, and of the tree-frog (Ilyla arborea). But it must be noted that Leuckart long ago noted the occurrence of spon- taneous division in frog ova. Similarly, Tichomiroff, experi- menting with the unfertilised ova of the silkmoth, which are occasionally parthenogenetic, was surprised to observe that ova, which would not of themselves develop parthenogenetically, might be induced to do so by certain stimuli. These con- sisted in rubbing the unfertilised ova with a brush, or in dipping them for two minutes in sulphuric acid and then washing them. In both cases, he says, a percentage of the ova thus artificially stimulated developed. It must be remem- bered that occasional parthenogenesis occurs in this insect, and all that Tichomiroff did was to incite this. J. Perez notes DEGENERATE SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. iSg ("P. V. Soc. Sci. Bordeaux,' - 18967, pp. 9-10) that gentle friction of silkmoth eggs stimulates parthenogenetic develop- ment, but that it occurs apart from this, especially in the eggs of very robust females. There is no doubt that reagents may considerably modify ova; thus the brothers Hertwig showed how it was in this way possible to overcome the non-receptivity of the ovum to more than one sperm. Nor can one forget how sexual reproduction in parasitic fungi tends to disappear, being possibly replaced by the stimulus afforded from the waste products of the host. In a similar way, the multiplication of cells, so frequently associated in disease with the presence of bacteria, has been referred by more than one pathologist to the "spermatic influence" of these micro-organisms, or of the katastates which they form. The most circumstantial account of successful artificial parthenogenesis is that given by Professor Jacques Loeb, who reared larvaa of a sea-urchin from unferti- lised eggs which had been left for a couple of hours in sea- water plus a solution of magnesium chloride, and then returned to the normal medium. Balfour has also cited a remarkable observation of Greefif, who saw unfertilised ova of the common starfish developing in ordinary sea-water, in a perfectly normal fashion, only more slowly than usual. (b) Pathological Parthenogenesis. — It has very occasionally been noticed in higher animals, where true parthenogenesis is wholly unknown, that an unfertilised egg starts off on its own resources without any male stimulus whatever. This is noted by Leuckart for frog ova, by Oellacher for hens' eggs, and by Bischoff and Hensen even in mammals. Barfurth has re-investigated the question of parthenogenesis in the hen's e gg> an d finds that the segments are non-nucleated, therefore not true cells. He explains the process as wholly physico-chemical. (Versuche fiber die parthenogenetische Furchung des Hiihnereies, "Arch. Entwickelungsme- chanik.," vol. ii., 1896.) In the ovarian ova of various mammals, e.g. guinea-pig, and rabbit, Janosik has observed (1} regular formation of polar bodies, (2) division into numerous nucleated segments either equal or un- equal, (3) fragmentation into many minu'e parts. (Die Atrophie der Follikel und ein seltsames Verhalten der Eizelle, "Arch. f. Mikr. Ana- tomie," xlviii., 1S96, pp. 169-181, 1 pi.) Such cases must be regarded as rare abnormalities, com- parable perhaps to pathological formations which not unfre- quently take place in the ovary, and it is hardly necessary to say that in no case did the development proceed far. 1 86 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. (c) Occasional Parthenogenesis. — In some of the lower animals, which are not themselves normally parthenogenetic, but have relatives which are, occasional parthenogenesis has been frequently observed. These differ from the above cases, since the results are more successful, often in fact reaching maturity, and also in this, that since related forms are partheno- genetic, the " abnormality" is evidently of a much milder type. The common silkmoth is a good example of this occasional parthenogenesis, which certainly occurs, though rare both in the genus and family. Out of 1,102 unfertilised eggs of the silkmoth, observed by Nussbaum, only 22 developed, and that only up to a certain point. " A whole series of insects," Weismann says, "reproduce exceptionally by parthenogenesis, for instance many butterflies, but that never to the extent that all the eggs which an unfertilised female lays develop, but only a fraction, and usually a very small fraction of the total number, the rest perishing. Examples of successful occasional parthenogenesis (to the extent at least of producing males) are furnished by those worker bees, wasps, and ants which excep- tionally become fertile." (d) Partial Parthenogenesis. — The queen-bee, as has been already mentioned, is impregnated by a drone in her nuptial flight. The sperms thus received are stored up, and used to fertilise the eggs as she lays them in the cells. Not all the eggs, however, but only those which will produce future queens or else workers. Other eggs, to all appearance similar, are un- fertilised, and these, as Dzierzon first clearly showed, develop solely into drones. It is a well-established fact that if ferti- lisation be prevented by the imperfect development of the wings, or by clipping them, the queen only lays drone eggs. The same happens when she is old and her store of male elements exhausted, or when the sperm receptacle has been removed. Von Siebold carefully examined the eggs from drone- cells, and found that they never contained spermatozoa. Hensen notes an interesting side fact, obviously corroboratory, that " German queen-bees, fertilised by Italian or Cyprian drones, produced hybrid females but pure drones, a proof that on the latter the sperm does not operate." Again, it some- times happens that what are called "fertile workers" crop up, which in consequence of some accident or misdirected inten- tion in the nutrition, become less abortive than the host of semi-females which make up the body of workers. They are DEGENERATE SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 187 fertile enough to lay eggs, but their female organs do not seem to admit of their being impregnated. Certain it is that they only produce drones. What has just been said in regard to beeSj is also true of some wasps and ants. (e) Seasonal Parthenogenesis. — In some of the minute aquatic crustaceans (Cladocera), popularly included under the general title of water-fleas, parthenogenesis only occurs for a season, and is periodically interrupted by the birth of males, and the occurrence of the ordinary sexual reproduction. Males generally reappear in the disadvantageous conditions of autumn, but Weismann denies that there is a direct connection between these facts. The common Aphides are parthenogenetic for a succession of generations, sometimes as many as fourteen, throughout the summer, but the cold and hard times of autumn bring back the males and the sexual process. The fertilised egg lives on through the winter, and develops with the warmth of the next spring. By keeping up the temperature and nutritive optimum for three or four years in the artificial summer of a glass case, Reaumur and Kyber succeeded in rearing as many as fifty continuous parthenogenetic genera- tions. In the gall-wasps (Cynipidae) there is usually only one parthenogenetic generation between the normal sexual repro- ductions, but in many insects besides Aphides there are several. It ought to be noted that the parthenogenetic Aphides are hardly at the same structural level as the females which are fertilised ; but as the differences mainly lie in the absence of certain accessory genital organs, there is no reason for regarding the parthenogenetic forms, as some have done, as larval. (/) Juvenile Parthenogenesis. — Cases do occur, however, where larval forms become precociously reproductive (as some- times happens among higher organisms), and produce offspring parthenogenetically. Such precocious production of partheno- genetic ova must be distinguished from the entirely asexual reproduction exhibited by many larvse. No very firm line can indeed be drawn, but in the last cases no cells which can be called ova are present. In 1865 Professor N. Wagner observed what has been much studied since, that in the larvse of some two-winged or dipterous midges (e.g., Miastor), the cells of the reproductive rudiment develop into larvae within the mother- larva's body. The mother falls a victim to her precocity, for the brood of seven to ten larvae literally feed upon her to the death. They finally leave the corpse and begin life for themselves, 1 88 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. only, however, themselves to fall victims to a similar fate. The process may thus go on for several generations, during which the ova, or pseudova as some would insist upon calling them, become smaller and smaller. Eventually the larvae become too constitutionally poor to be precociously parthenogenetic, and develop into adult midges — male and female, the latter producing, however, only a few eggs. In another dipterous insect known as Chironomus, the ova begin to be produced at a very early stage, are laid just at the time when the larval life ends, and develop parthenogenetically. According to Jaworowski, by the rupture of the ovarian mem- brane the ova fall into the body-cavity, where the abundant nutritive stimulus takes the place of fertilisation. Juvenile parthenogenesis is also said by Von Siebold to occur among the Strepsiptera, little insects which infest bees. (g) Total Parthe?iogenesis. — Lastly, in some of the minute aquatic crustaceans and in many rotifers no males have ever been found. There is every probability that the partheno- genesis is thus total ; and as the numbers are abundant, it has apparently been established without detriment to, at least, the continuance of the species. § 3. Occurrence of Parthenogenesis. — In three distinct sets of animals — rotifers, crustaceans, and insects — parthenogenesis has become a confirmed physiological habit. (a) Take first the curious little rotifers, or wheel-animalcules, which abound both in fresh and salt water. They are usually placed in the chaotic alliance of worm-types, and have long been famous for their alleged power of surviving prolonged desiccation. With one or two exceptions the males are markedly different from the females, and are usually small and degenerate. In one group (Philodinadse) the females have two ovaries, while males have never been found. They have dwindled out of existence. In the rest the females have one ovary, part of which has degenerated into a yolk-gland, and small males occur. These are quite superfluous as mates, however, for parthenogenesis prevails. Even when impregnation, which is a peculiarly random process, occurs, the sperms appear to miss their mark, and to perish in the body-cavity. The numbers keep up, notwithstanding, so that we have here an entire class where parthenogenesis has firmly established itself. (t>) Among crustaceans, parthenogenesis is restricted to the lower orders, viz., branchiopods and ostracods. In the former, it is exhibited by the brine-shrimp Artemia and the common fresh-water Apus in one division; by daphnids (e.g. , Daphnia and Moina, common "water-fleas") in the other. In ostracods, some species of the common Cypi'is are partheno- genetic. If a female water-flea, say Daphnia, be isolated from birth, she becomes the mother of an abundant progeny of females. Males and DEGENERATE SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 189 sexual reproduction do, however, eventually return, and the same is probably true of the majority. Among three thousand specimens of the brine-shrimp only one male occurred; while Von Siebold repeatedly in- vestigated every member of a colony of Apus, once over five thousand in number, without finding a single male. At other times he found one per cent., while in certain unknown conditions (probably when food is scarce and life generally unfavourable) the males may be developed in crowds. In the daphnids, which have been so success- fully studied by Weismann, the facts are more complex. There are two kinds of eggs — winter and summer ova. The former are large, thick shelled, capable of resisting drought and the like, and of remaining long latent. They only develop if fertilised, and always produce females. In every way they are highly anabolic ova. The summer eggs, on the other hand, are smaller, and thinner in the shell. They can develop without fertilisation, and that is indeed in some cases physically impossible. Males are produced from summer eggs alone. They usually appear in autumn, when life is becoming harder, or the conditions more katabolic. In the little cyprids the reproductive rela- tions are very varied. Thus in Cypris ovum and Notodromus monachus the males are abundant all the year round, and parthenogenesis is unknown. In other species, e.g., Candona Candida, the males are still frequent, but parthenogenesis nevertheless occurs. Lastly, parthenogenesis prevails in some cases, like Cypris fusca and C. pubera, and the males are rare, appearing usually in spring. We may find instances of permanent, seasonal, or even merely local parthenogenesis, — a variety of occurrence which strongly sug- gests that environmental stimuli are of much importance. (c) In insects, as we have seen, the degrees of parthenogenesis are very varied; so too is the systematic position of the forms in which normal parthenogenesis occurs. Two butter- flies (Psyche helix and Solenobia, 2 sp. ) and a beetle (Gastrophysa), some coccus-insects and Aphides, certain saw-flies (Tenthredinidae) and gall-wasps (Cynipidse), are normally parthenogenetic. In the butterflies just noticed, the males seem to disappear for a stretch of years, and the species gets on without them. The male of Psyche helix is very rare, and was for long unknown. When the males are developed in Solenobia trinquelrella, it is interesting to notice that they may predominate in numbers over the females. A whole brood may be male ; they are brought Owen's figure of the Genera- lions of Aphides. At the base an individual arises from a fertilised egg-cell ; this gives origin partheno- genetically to a brood, and so on through a succession of generations. At the top the male and female forms reappear, and sexual re- production returns. At the side an earlier appear- ance of sexual forms is suggested. T90 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. back with a rush. About a score of mollis, including the silkmoth (Bombyx mori) and death's-head (Sphinx atropos), have been known to exhibit casual parthenogenesis; but the beetle above noticed stands alone. Bassett, Adler, and others, have demonstrated an interesting alternation of parthenogenesis and ordinary sexual reproduction in numerous gall-wasps. Forms which had been legarded as quite distinct, and had received different generic titles, have been shown in about a score of cases to be merery the partheno- genetic and normal forms of the same insects. From a winter gall the parthenogenetic form emerges which produces a summer gall. In this a sexual form is produced, which eventually gives rise to the winter gall. § 4. Parthenogenesis in Plants. — The passive bias is so strong in plants, that it is easy to understand the rarity of parthenogenesis. The egg-cell which develops of itself must retain the stimulus which the male element in other cases supplies. It is natural, then, that what predominates in the active rotifers should be uncommon in the sleeping plants. In some of the flowering plants, what looked like parthenogenesis has repeatedly been described, especially in regard to a native of New Holland, known as Ccelebogyme. When cultivated in Europe, the male flowers degenerate, and according to Braun and Hanstein disappear. Yet fertile seeds are pro- duced. Karsten found, however, that stamens often persisted ; while Strasburger has shown that what developed were not true egg-cells, but adventitious growths from cells outside the embryo-sac. The same is true of some other cases. Dr A, Ernst has recently described what he calls true parthenogenesis in a Menisperm found by him in Caracas, and named Disciphania Emstii. "Female plants, which bore no male flowers, and which were grown perfectly isolated where there was no possibility of the access of pollen from another plant, produced in three successive years an increasing number of fertile fruits." Kerner von Marilaun and H. O. Juel have shown that in Antennaria alpina fertile seeds are produced without impregnation, the male plants being very rare and producing no functional pollen - grains ("Bot. Centralbl.," Ixxiv., 1898, pp. 369-372), and there are several similar cases on record. In the lower plants, however, cases of parthenogenesis abound, apparently as one of the stages in the degeneration of sexual reproduction. It has been casually observed of a species of the stonewort (Chara), that when grown in certain waters the male organs disappear, yet the plants continue multiplying. More interesting are the Fungi. To illustrate sexual degeneration, De Bary gives a series from Fungi like those which kill the salmon and potato (Saprolegnise and Peronospores:). What happens first, is the degeneration of the male organs. The katabolic sex from beginning to end is the more unstable. The male function goes first, but the form remains after the reality has ceased. After a while, that is in related species, the form goes too. Sometimes the function is changed, and the male organs become protective sheaths. De Bary's series may be briefly summed up. (1.) In Pythium, the male organ discharges most of its protoplasm into the female, — the usual process. (2.) In Phytophthora, only a very small portion is thus given, and we may almost say asked, for there are curious demand and supply arrangements and compulsions between the male and female organs in these Fungi. DEGENERATE SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 19T (3.) In Pcronospora, there is no perceptible passage of protoplasm from male to female, though, without going back to the "aura seminalis," we may allow the possibility of subtle osmosis. (4.) In some Saprolegnue, there are indeed the usual antheridia or male organs, which are directed towards the female organs, but do nut open. The " explosive" character is diminishing. (5.) In others, the male organs never get near the female. (6.) In others, there are no male organs at all, but the female cells develop as usual. Parthenogenesis is thus reached, as the result plainly of a degenerative process. We can follow the story further, however, forestalling for the moment the subject of the next chapter. The male-organ has degenerated, we have seen, while the female organ holds on its course. But this is not always so ; in many cases it follows suit, and asexual reproduction remains. Now why should these Fungi among plants exhibit numerous instances of parthenogenesis ? The more intimate the parasitism, the more degene- rate the sexual reproduction, and all trace of it is often lost. It may be that in the vital economy of the species the nutritive stimulus of the host in some measure takes the place of fertilisation. Or it may be that the stimuli which Klebs has shown to be operative in inducing the occurrence of asexual or sexual reproduction in Alga? and Fungi which have both modes of multiplication, are absent in the parasitic forms above referred to. Male parthenogenesis, paradoxical as it sounds, is really exhibited among lowly Algje. That is to say, a small spore (or male-cell) which normally unites with a larger and more quiescent one (or female-cell), may occasionally start developing on its own resources. The result, however, is poor enough. As those spores are on the border line between asexuality and differentiated sex-elements, the retention of a vegetative power of division even by the incipient male-cell is not surprising. Nor must it be forgotten that the mother-sperm-cell itself has a power of parthenogenetic development. It divides, like its homologue the ovum, into a ball of cells, but, having none of the conservative coherence of the latter, breaks up into spermatozoa. It is exactly comparable to the interesting Protozoon (Magosphsra) which Haeckel saw, which did its best to get beyond the Protozoa, but failed as soon as it had succeeded. A single infusorian-like cell divided into a ball of cells, but the ball had no coherence and broke up into infusorians once more. § 5. The Offspring of Parthenogenesis. — The fate of parthenogenetic ova is very diverse. They may all perish, or all succeed ; they may turn out wholly males or wholly females. Hensen notes the following suggestive series, with decreasing reproductive, as opposed to constitutional, energy at each level : — (1.) Hermaphrodites, then only females. (2.) Series of females, then mixed brood. (3.) Several females, mixed brood, then only males. (4.) Series of mixed broods, then males, or death of ova. (5.) Mixed brood, with much mortality. (6.) Males only. (7.) Development only for a few stages. Rolph has a different arrangement, but the same idea: — (1.) Exceptional parthenogenesis with uncertain result [e.g\ t Silkmoth), 192 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. (2.) Normal, producing males only (female solely from fertilised ova) (e.g., Bees). (3.) Mostly males, with occasional females (e.g., Nemalus). (4.) Mostly females, with exceptional or periodic males (e.g., Apus, Arlemia). (5.) Only female, males unknown (e.g. , many Rotifers). That parthenogenetic ova should develop with such diverse results is not at all surprising. The absence of fertilisation removes one of the factors determining sex ; but food, temperature, age of ovum, &c. , remain, and produce bias now to one side, now to the other. To this we shall presently return; meanwhile the facts of offspring may be more clearly expressed thus : — Example. Most organism 1 ;. Karities mentioned. Many insects. Hive-bee and some other forms. Ncmatus (allied to bee). Most gall-wasps. Some saw-flies. Some water-fleas. Solenobia sometimes. Aphides; some water- fleas. Many water-fleas. Most rotifers. Many rotifers. Result. [Nil Partial and pathological development Great mortality in a mixed brood. . c5 's alone .... i 's mostly, a few 9 's . . (5 's and 9 's (one generation) $ 's, and more than a few 9 's 9 9 9 (a succession), then a predomin- ance of S 's 9 9 9, then equal numbers of S 's and 9 's 9 9 9, then a minority of S 's among 9 's 9 9 9 9, very rare $ 's 9 9 9 9, non-functional { 's among 9 's i. 9 9 9 9 , ad infinitum, no 6 's § 6. Effects of Parthenogenesis. — Since parthenogenesis is dominant in rotifers, and well established among water-fleas and plant-lice, it is very plain that whatever else it affects, it is anything but prejudicial to numbers. An aphis will continue for days producing a viviparous brood, at the rate of one per hour; the offspring soon begin themselves to multiply; and Huxley calculates that if this continued for a year without mortality, a single aphis would be the ancestor of a progeny which would weigh down five hundred millions of stout men ! Not gardeners only have cause for gratitude that climate and enemies prevent such untoward increase. But there are other desiderata besides numbers. Can it be said that partheno- genesis favours the general life and progress of the species? More than one of the old naturalists, and in recent years Brooks, Galton, Weismann, and others, have laid emphasis on the value of fertilisation as a fountain of change. To Weismann DEGENERATE SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 1 93 the intermingling of the male and female "germ-plasms" in fertilisation is one of the possible sources of variation. If it be removed therefore, as in rotifers, the species will be so much the less likely to progress, the establishment of parthenogenesis will be a handicapping of evolution. But Weismann has shown that variation still occurs in the parthenogenetic Cyprids, and variations of Rotifers, e.g., Anurcea cochlearis, have been often recorded. In the well- known case just mentioned, however, the varieties are cor- related with the seasons, and it seems to us probable that they are seasonal " modifications " rather than true constitutional variations. While recognising, then, the occurrence of variations in forms where the reproduction is parthenogenetic, or even quite asexual, we suggest the probability that the absence of fertilisa- tion involves some diminution in the frequency and range of variability. § 7. Peculiar! fy of the Parthenogenetic Ova. — Before a theory of parthenogenesis is sought, the natural question arises, Are these eggs that develop of themselves in any way peculiar? (a) For a while it was supposed (e.g., by Balfour) that parthenogenetic ova did not form polar globules, and the theory based upon this regarded the retention of these bodies as taking the place of fertilisation. The demonstrated occur- rence of one polar globule in several parthenogenetic eggs partially demolished this theory, and it is only within the last two or three years that it has been restated in accurate form. (b) Simon shrewdly points out, that in some of the most marked cases of parthenogenesis the sex-cells are insulated from the body at a very early stage. This is notably so in those midges which reproduce parthenogenetically even before maturity. It is certainly striking that these forms should unite an extreme earliness in the embryonic separation of the germ-cells with a most precocious reproduction. These germ-cells are ova which have a much less circuitous history than in most cases ; they have far fewer cell-divisions behind them, they have thus a reserve power of division which other ova have not ; they are able, in fact, to develop of themselves. Although this is not known to be true of all instances of normal parthenogenesis (e.g., rotifers), it is true of some, and that to a greater extent than was known when Simon wrote. On the other hand, some forms where parthenogenesis is J 3 194 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. unknown (e.g., leeches and Sagittd), also exhibit the same early differentiation of germ-cells, so that we can only look upon the fact as one of the auxiliaries of parthenogenesis (c) The peculiarity of parthenogenetic ova, which has of late attracted much attention, is that they extrude only one polar cell, — not two, like other eggs. Weismann, with the assistance of Ischikawa, proved this for the parthenogenetic ova of Rotifers and Ostracods, such as Polyphemus, Leplodora hya- lina, Sida crystallina, Cypris reptans. Blochmann has also corroborated Weismann's discovery by observations on aphides, but he found two polar bodies in those unfertilised eggs of bees which give rise to drones. The occurrence of two polar bodies was also noted by Tlatner in the parthenogenetic ova of a butterfly (Liparis). The apparent contradiction has been in part explained by the discovery of Brauer that in the par- thenogenetic ova of the brine-shrimp Artemia, two modes of maturation occur. In most cases only one polar body is formed, in other cases two are formed, but the second does not leave the egg and behaves just like a sperm-nucleus. A further enquiry into the exact history of the nuclear rods or chromo- somes shows that the two cases can be plausibly reconciled. § 8. Theory of Parthetwgenesis. — (a) We may begin with Balfour's view of the case, though that of Minot has the priority. " The function of forming polar cells has been acquired by the ovum for the express purpose of preventing parthenogenesis." If they were not formed, parthenogenesis would normally occur. This is expressed in curiously teleological language, but the main idea is clear enough, — the retained polar cells replace the sperm nucleus. (d) "In accordance with Minot's hypothesis of sexuality, it might be assumed that in parthenogenetic ova the male element was retained, and that the cell remained a true asexual cell, and did not become a sexual element." " Blochmann and Weis- mann have shown that this is the case, by their discovery that in parthenogenetic ova only one polar globule is formed, while there are always two in ova which are impregnated; hence it is probable that one polar globule (by hypothesis, male) is retained." Minot's words are not beyond criticism either, though they are not teleological. An ovum which retains a male element is not happily described as remaining asexual; it would be better to call it a case of intracellular hermaphroditism. It is DEGENERATE SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 195 more important, however, to notice how Minot cleverly adapts his theory to increased knowledge of the facts. The partheno- genetic ovum only retains one polar globule, — one male element is enough; two would be " polyspermy," which is abhorred. (c) There was no fear that Rolph would indulge in teleology, rigid necessitarian as he was. Parthenogenesis of ova was to him the more natural process, the sperm a subsequent impor- tation.. " There is for the ovum a certain minimal mass, which must be surpassed if it is to develop at all; and a second mini- mum, which the ovum must attain, if a female is to be produced." Abundant nutrition of the ovum tends to parthenogenesis, pro- ducing male offspring, as the lower stage; but if the second limit be attained, resulting in females. In the opposite direc- tion, if the ovum has fewer resources, it requires to be fertilised. Females or males will again result according to the state of the elements. If no fertilisation occur, the dependent ovum must of course die. Rolph is always suggestive, but he erred in regarding the sex-elements too quantitatively, in missing the qualitative antithesis of sex, and the opposition observed in cell-division. (d) Strasburger also lays emphasis, in a subtler and more technical way, on nutritive conditions. " In the rare cases of parthenogenesis, specially favourable nutritive conditions may counteract the lack of nuclear plasma." He notes three different ways in which this may happen, and also inclines to believe that retention of polar globules would favour partheno- genetic development. It is important to notice how two naturalists, so very different in their manner of attacking a subject as Rolph and Strasburger are, come to this conclusion at least in common, that favourable nutritive conditions favour parthenogenesis. All the cells in the body tend to multiply, the ova retaining this power develop embryos. (e) Weismann has a peculiar right to be heard on the nature of parthenogenesis; for not only has he been for many years an investigator of the tiny daphnids or water-fleas, but he made the important discovery, already noticed, that parthenogenetic ova extrude only one polar globule. There has not been time yet to prove that this is always true, but the probabilities are strong that it is. Weismann's first supposition was that in maturation of ordinary ova the first polar division got rid of "oogenetic" nuclear plasm, and that the second removed part of the essential germ-plasm; and that in the maturation of par- 196 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX.- thenogenetic ova only the first process occurred. This view is- expressed in the following paragraphs. " Parthenogenesis occurs when the entire sum of the ancestral elements persists in the nucleus of the ovum. Development by fertilisation demands, however, that half of these ancestral elements must first be extruded from the ovum, whereupon the remaining half, in uniting with the sperm nucleus, regains the original number. " In both cases the beginning of development depends upon the presence of a definite, and indeed similar mass of germ-plasma. In the ovum which requires fertilisation, this is afforded by the importation of the sperm- nucleus, and development follows on the heels of fertilisation. The par- thenogenetic ovum already contains the necessary mass of germ-plasma, and this becomes active as soon as the single polar body has freed the ovum from the oogenetic nuclear-plasma." He has now given up the hypothesis that the first polar body removes " oogenetic idioplasm," and the second germ-plasm; he admits that germ- plasm is got rid of in both cases. In parthenogenetic ova, however, where only one polar body is extruded, a sufficient quantity of germ-plasm is retained to make development without fertilisation possible. The view which Weismann now holds (vide " The Germ-Plasm," 1893) seems to amount to this, that the reduction of germ-plasm in the matura- tion of ordinary ova is too great to admit of independent development, but that in parthenogenetic ova the reduction is less and development without fertilisation occurs. It maybe urged that we have not as yet sufficiently secure data in regard to the reducing processes in parthenogenetic ova, and it must be noted that there are some authorities who refuse to grant that the em- phasis which Weismann and others have laid on the reducing divisions is justified. Thus Professor Hartog maintains (" Natural Science," xiii., 1898, pp. 1 1 5- 1 20) that the process of nuclear reduction does not affect the quantity of nuclear material, but only the number of segments into which it is divided. He suggests that it is the achromatic plasma or linin which bears the hereditary characters, and that the chromatin has only a mechanical function. Weismann's pre-occupation with questions of inheritance has given a bias to his theory, making it morphological rather than physiological. A given quantum of germ-plasma, he says, fits the ovum to develop. The parthenogenetic ovum keeps enough. The ordinary ovum extrudes so much that it has to get it back again from another source. It appears to us more in accordance with the facts to suppose that the entrance of the sperm has a twofold importance, — (a) It bears with it certain hereditary charac- teristics, doubtless in the nucleus for the most part ; (b) it brings with it a stimulus to division of a qualitative character, doubtless in some part in its small cell-substance. This last function — the dynamic function — Weismann wholly denies. The sperm has to him only a quantitative function. (/) Our theory of parthenogenesis may now be stated. Just as the spores which illustrate the beginnings of sex may some- times dispense with conjugation and germinate independently, so may ova develop parthenogenetically. These are to be regarded as incompletely differentiated female cells, which DEGENERATE SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. I97 retain a measure of katabolic (relatively male) products, and thus do not need fertilisation. Such a successful balance between anabolism and katabolism is indeed the ideal of all organic life. In parasitic fungi, sexual reproduction disappears, and surrounding waste products presumably help the purpose otherwise effected by sexual organs, so peculiarities in the con- ditions of parthenogenetic ova may explain the retention of the normal balance which makes division possible without the usual stimulus of fertilisation. Abundant and at the same time stimulating nutrition (Rolph), early differentiation of the sex-cells (Simon), the general preponderance of reproductive over vegetative constitution (Hensen), their liberation before the anabolic bias has carried them too far, are among these f parthenogenesis (p). Female < sex (s). ^disease (D). f parthenogenesis (p) sex (s). disease (D). t: Diagram illustrating the theory of parthenogenesis. favouring conditions. Artificial parthenogenesis can be in- duced in some cases by chemical reagents; thus in Loeb's experiments with sea-urchin ova magnesium chloride seemed to have (perhaps very indirectly) the same physiological role as spermatozoa. The incipient segmentation observed in a few ova is an independent effort to save themselves from being too big to live, since they are not passive enough to remain dor- mant. Waste has set in, self-digestion begins, the cell is forced into the expedient of division. In higher animals this is all in vain : in lower animals such imperfectly differentiated female cells are commoner; they form the parthenogenetic ova. § 9. Origin of Parthenogenesis. — From the occurrence of parthenogenesis in the animal series, it is certain that it has 198 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. originated as a degeneration from the ordinary sexual process. It is no direct persistence of a primitive ideal state, though in a sense a return to it. It seems to us misleading to interpret the occurrence of parthenogenesis as due to " motives " and " important ad- vantages." These are afterthoughts of our importation. It is not easy indeed to keep from metaphorical language which suggests that polar globule-formation is a " contrivance," and parthenogenesis a " device." Such casual words are of little account ; but it is going far to say, as Weismann does, " that sexual reproduction has here been given up, not by any chance nor from internal conditions, but from quite definite external grounds of utility (Zweckmassigkeitsgrunden)." Our position is the converse, that parthenogenesis arises because of necessary internal conditions, and may be perpetuated because of certain advantages. DEGENERATE SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. I99 SUMMARY. t. Parthenogenesis was formerly believed to be of wider occurrence than it really is, but it is definitely known to be not uncommon in lower animals. 2. Artificial, pathological, occasional, partial, seasonal, juvenile, and total parthenogenesis must be distinguished. 3. The occurrence of parthenogenesis is especially well seen in rotifers, crustaceans, and insects. 4. It is rare among plants, but certainly occurs in some. 5- The offspring of parthenogenetic ova are very diverse. 6. The effects of parthenogenesis on the species deserve consideration, especially by those who find in sexual intermingling an important source of specific variation. 7. So far as we know, parthenogenetic ova (with two or three excep- tions) form only one polar body. 8. Parthenogenetic ova are here regarded as imperfectly differentiated female cells, retaining certain characteristics which compensate for the absence of fertilisation. 9. In origin parthenogenesis is regarded as a degeneration from the ordinary sexual process. LITERATURE. See especially the already cited works of Balfour, Brooks, Hensen, Minot, Rolph, Sachs, Weismann; also — Blochmann — Ueber die Richtungskorper bei Insekteneiern. Biolog. Cen- tralblatt, VII., and Morpholog. Jahrbuch, XII. Brooks, W. K. — Law of Heredity. Baltimore, 1883. Gerstvecker. — Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Thierreich, Vol. V., Arthropod a. Giard, A. — Sur le developpement parthenogenetique de la microgamete des metazoaires. C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, 1899, 4 PP- Hudson and Gosse. — The Rotifera. London, 1886. Karsten, H. — Parthenogenesis und Generatibns-Wechsel im Thier und Pflanzenreiche. Berlin, 1888. Leuckart. — Art. "Zeugung" in Wagner's Handworterbuch d. Physiol., Bd. IV, 1853. Owen. — Parthenogenesis; or, The Successive Production of Procreating Individuals from a Single Ovum. London, 1849. Plate. — Beitrage zur Naturgeschichte der Rotatorien. Jenaische Zeitschft. f. Naturwiss, XIX., 1886. Seidlitz, G. — Die Parthenogenesis. Leipzig, 1872. Von SlEBOLD. — Beitrage zur Parthenogenesis. Leipzig, 1871. Simon, F. — Die Sexualitat, &c, Inaug. Dissertation. Breslau, 1883. Weismann, A. — Beitr. zur Naturgeschichte der Daphnoiden. Leipzig, 1876-79. Ueber die Zahl der Richtungskorper und uber ihre Be- deutung fur die Vererbung. Jena, 1887. The Germ-Plasm, 1893. Weismann, A., and Ischikawa, C. — Ber.,naturforsch. Ges., Freiburg, III., 1887. Wilson, E. B. — The Cell in Development and Inheritance, 1896. CHAPTER XIV. Asexual Reproduction. § i. Artificial Division. — Weeping willows are by no means scarce trees in Britain, yet, as they never flower, they must all have grown from slips. In other words, their multiplication is asexual and artificial. So too, only more naturally, the Canadian pond-weed (Anacharis) has spread prodigiously in A group of Sea-Anemones our lochs, canals, and rivers, never bearing male flowers, but owing its increase wholly to the asexual process. Every one knows how the gardener increases his stock by slips and cutilngs, thus taking advantage of the power a part has to reproduce the whole. Bananas, potatoes, and yarns are in the same way propagated asexually, and this is also the usual ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 201 method in the case of olives, figs, and date palms. Quite in the same way, cultivators of bath sponges are able to bed out little fragments. In the last century," the Abbe Trembiey delighted himself and others by the now familiar observation, that to get many hydra polypes, the simplest and quickest way was to cut one in pieces. A fragment will reproduce the whole, provided always that it have to start with fair samples of the different kinds of cells in the body, and that it be not too minute. The same may be done with the much larger sea-anemones. So the earthworm, curtailed by the spade, does not necessarily suffer loss, though it ma)' suffer pain. The head portion grows a new tail, and even a decapitated portion may The Formation of a Sponge Colony {OlynUiiis) by budding. — After Haeckel. reproduce a head and brain, not that this is saying much for these. § 2. Regeneration. — Spades and knives are not exactly instruments of nature, but they have their counterparts. Fight- ing with a rival a crab may lose its claw, or the same may happen in the frequently fatal moulting. Slowly, however, the loss is made good; the cells of the stump multiply, and arrange themselves in obedience to the same necessities as before, and a limb is regenerated. Many an appendage among the lower animals is from time to time nipped off, only to be grown again. A snail has been known to regenerate an amputated eye-bearing horn twenty times. A starfish readily surrenders an arm, and a lizard its tail. Indeed, many animals may be said to have learnt organically, though not consciously, that it is better for one member to perish than for the whole life to 202 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. be lost. For animals, like men, are often wiser than they wot of. In the panic of capture, strong convulsions may occur; thus the sea-cucumber may surprise and perhaps shock its persecutor by the ejection of its viscera; or a tetanic contrac- tion of the muscles makes the slow-worm brittle in the hands of its captor. The power of regeneration is most marked in echinoderms, but persists as high up as reptiles. The re-growth of part of a lizard's leg is the ckef-d'ceiivre in this line. Beyond that, regeneration is restricted to little things. We constantly regenerate the skin of our lips, but we cannot naturally re- place an amputated limb. The regenerative capacity depends on primary properties of the living matter and of the organism — which we are far from understanding, — but it seems probable, as Reaumur, Lessona, Darwin, Weismann, and others have pointed out, that its dis- tribution and mode of occurrence are adaptive, being related to the normal risks of life. According to Lessona's law, which Weismann has elaborated, regeneration occurs in those organ- isms and in those parts of organisms which are in the course of nature most liable to injury. (See Weismann, " Natural Science," xiv., 1899, pp. 305-328; " Anat. Anzeiger," xv., 1899, PP- 445-474- ) _ This position may be argued for in two ways. One may try to show that all parts known to be markedly capable of regeneration are liable to be lost or injured under natural conditions ; and one may show that parts not very liable to be injured are not regenerated, although they are often of great importance. It must be admitted that there are cases of regeneration — e.g., of a stork's bill or a newt's eye — where the natural liability to injury is not at first sight evident. But inquiry shows that male storks fight savagely, and that the head, and possibly the eye of the newt, are often attacked by the larvae of the water- beetle (Dyliscus viarginalis). But an explanation of the re- generative capacity of the protected abdominal limbs of hermit-crabs, which T. H. Morgan has demonstrated, is more difficult, unless one supposes that the power has been inherited from ancestral Crustaceans whose abdomen was unprotected, or that the liability to injury to which the supposed adaptation is related is associated with the process of moulting. That the latter supposition should be tested is made clear by the observations of Bordage on Phasmids and other Orthoptera. ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 2O3 But Morgan's criticism of Weismann's position has not yet been adequately met. As to the second point, it will be admitted by most that injuries to internal organs are seldom made good. § 3. Degrees of Asexual Reproduction. — The keynote of the subject was struck by Spencer and Haeckel, when they denned asexual reproduction as discontinuous growth. All growth is a reproduction of the protoplasm and its nuclear elements, or, in short, of the cells ; all reproduction (excluding the important event of fertilisation) is growth. The ovum, asexually produced from the parent ovum or its lineally descendant cells, grows and reproduces itself in turn, building up the embryo. The embryo grows into an adult organism, and the surplus of continued growing energy results in the asexual production of buds, or the sexual discharge of differentiated reproductive elements. We may start from the ordinary processes of cell-multiplication and regeneration exhibited in the normal organism. Then come the processes by which lost members are regenerated, involving more or less serious extra growth. From these we may pass to the rarer and yet not rare cases, where the artificial halves or fractions of an organism can grow into wholes. Normal and frequent, however, are the very abundant cases of budding, where a sponge or hydra, zoophyte or coral, has surplus enough to grow off new individuals, which remain con- tinuous with itself. The parent organism, whether zoophyte or strawberry-plant, has an asexually produced progeny round about, and in asexual continuity with itself. But they do not always remain continuous ; the hydra produces buds, but eventually sets them adrift. This is still better seen in many of the hydroids, where individuals are separated off as swim- ming-bells or medusoids. The multiplication has become discontinuous. Continue the process, and we find the libera- tion of special cells, clinging often for a time to the parent, generally dependent for development on union with similar cells of complementary constitution; we find, in fact, the sexual reproduction which, in the higher organisms, so thoroughly replaces the asexual process. § 4. Occurrence of Asexual Reproduction in Plants and Animals. — In plants, as one would expect from their vegetative constitution, the asexual process is common, particularly among the lower forms. The common liverworts (Marchanlia and JLunularia), through the formation of asexual buds or gemmag 204 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. in the cups upon their thallus, rapidly overrun our flower-pots, and become a pest of the greenhouse. Many ferns too, notably among the Aspleniums, reproduce by bulbils, arising upon the frond ; and the bulbils which arise in the axils of the leaves of the tiger-lily are familiar missiles for every child accustomed to a flower-garden (see figs. pp. 211 and 240). The Alliums, and some of our common grasses also, furnish us with examples of the replacement of flowers by separable buds. Asexual re- production, or multiplication by more or less discontinuous Asexual Propagation of a Grass — ().— After Sachs. Diagram of the Tiger Lily, show- ing bulbils (a) in lower axils, and flower above. generally posterior position of the organs, their frequent close association with the excretory system, their occasional rupture as external sacs, must not be lost sight of. {b) The Contrast in the Individual Life. — Growth during youth, sexual maturity at the limit of growth, the continued alternation of vegetative and reproductive periods, are common- GROWTH AND REPRODUCTION. 24 T places of observation which require no emphasis. If growth and vegetative increase are the outcome of preponderant ana- bolism, reproduction and sexuality as their antitheses must re- present the katabolic reaction from these. But anabolism and katabolism are the two sides of protoplasmic life; and the major rhythms of the respective preponderance of these, give the familiar antitheses we have been noting. These contrasts of metabolism represent the swings of the organic see-saw; the periodic contrasts correspond to alternate weightings or lightenings of the two sides. Yet the contrast is less than it seems. In previous chapters we have seen how growth, be- coming overgrowth, turns into reproduction ; and how sexual reproduction, dispensing with fertilisation, may degenerate till we know it no longer from growth. Reproduction, moreover, is as primitive as nutrition, for not only do hunger and love become indistinguishable in that equal-sided conjugation which has been curiously called " isophagy," but nutrition in turn is nothing more than continual reproduction of the protoplasm. Here, indeed, we have been anticipated by Hatschek, who clearly states the more than verbal paradox, that all nutrition is reproduction. § 7. The Contrast between Asexual and Sexual Repro- duction. — In plenty, the hydra buds ; in poverty, it reproduces sexually. In the same way, the liverwort on the flower-pot bears its pretty cryptogamic " flowers " when its exuberant growth and budding have come to an end. On rich soil a plant has luxuriant foliage ; but great abundance is the reverse of conducive to the richest crop of flowers and fruit. Gruber, Maupas, and others, have shown that abundant nutrition favours the asexual multiplication, i.e., the division of in- fusorians. In other words, the maximum size is rapidly reached when food is abundant, but the conditions at the limit of growth bring about reproduction. Preponderant ana- bolism leads up to the possibility of multiplication, but we need the onset of katabolism to bring about the reproductive crisis. Gruber also notes, that in the very reverse of favour- able conditions, rapid division with diminution of size and resulting conjugation sets in; and Khawkine observes the occurrence of division, both at an optimum and in famine. In both cases a katabolic crisis is associated with reproduction, though the crisis may be, and often is, preceded by an anabolic preponderance. 16 243 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. In regard to a common infusorian (Leucophrys patula), Maupas observes that with abundant food the ordinary fission continues, but with scanty nutrition a metamorphosis occurs, followed by six successive divisions, which have for their end conjugation. That is to say, we have positive proof that in these lowest organisms, katabolic conditions determine the beginning of sexual reproduction, a matter of no small import- ance to the evolutionist. Generalising, M. Maupas concludes that the reproductive power of ciliated infusorians depends, (i) on the quality and quantity of the food; (2) on the tempera- ture; (3) on the alimentary adaptation of the buccal organs. He also demonstrates that with a vegetarian diet their rate of asexual reproduction is much less, and the size smaller. Taking these facts, along with his important demonstration that the life of ciliated infusorians runs in cycles of asexual reproduc- tion, necessarily interrupted (if the life of the species is to continue) by conjugation or sexual reproduction, we again reach the general conclusion that anabolic conditions favour asexual reproduction, rather than sexual; and that while preponderant anabolism is the necessary condition of the overgrowth which makes the asexual reproduction possible, the onset of katabolic preponderance is necessary to the act itself. Semper quotes an interesting observation by Strethill Wright, unfortunately somewhat vague, that certain polyps multiply abundantly in the dark by buds, while in the light, and with insufficient supplies of food, they bring forth sexual individuals or medusae. More precise is the fact already cited fror.i Zacharias, that the spontaneous asexual multiplication of planarians went on apace when the food supply was copious (anabolic condition), but if the amount of food was reduced or altogether withdrawn (katabolic condition) the asexual re- production completely ceased. Bergendal reports that in the transverse division of another planarian worm (Bipalium), the severed links were all sexually immature; and the results of Rywosch demonstrate the same antithesis between the sexual and the asexual process. In the same way, sexual reproduction is contrasted with its degenerate expression in parthenogenesis. The conditions of the latter in aphides and phylloxera are demonstrably anabolic, the normal sexual process recurs with the periodic return of hard times, or in relatively katabolic conditions. In the lower crus- taceans, a similar contrast of conditions has also been observed. GROWTH AND REPRODUCTION. 243 It is again, on the present view, readily intelligible why in the exceptionally favourable anabolic environment of bacteria and many parasitic fungi sexual reproduction should be absent. Marshall Ward has pointed out that the more intimate the degree of parasitism or saprophytism, the more degenerate the sexual reproduction. The greater the anabolism, in other words, the more growth and the less sexuality. That such comparatively complex organisms can continue their asexual reproduction, dispensing altogether with the acknowledged stimulus of fertilisation, may probably be at least partially explained on the assumption that the abundant waste products of the host act as extrinsic stimuli. On this view, moreover, alternation of generations loses much of its uniqueness. The contrast between the vegetative Pollen Grain : a., the two nuclei ; b, the general protoplasm ', . vv-;rs- V*% 'J%^rWr A figure of cell division suggesting the internal disruptions and rearrangements of the nucleus (a) and protoplasm. — From Rauber. liberated, the mother animal has been sacrificed in reproduc- tion. "The death is an altogether inevitable consequence of the reproduction." Nor is this sacrifice confined to the incipient multicellular organisms. Thus in some species of the annelid Polygordius, the mature females break up and die in liberating their ova, 18 274 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. In the " Heteronereis," or sexually modified form of Nereid worms, the whole animal dies after the emission of the genital products. This is approached, but suggestively avoided, in some other Polychaet worms, e.g., the Syllidae and the Clito- maslus. The whole organism is not sacrificed, but only a modified portion of the body. This is probably also the case with the famous Palolo-worm {Eunice viridis). Here in fact we have one of the keynotes to reproductive differentiation, — the sacrifice is lessened, and the fatality thus warded off. Orthonectids, showing the rupture of the female in liberating the germs. — From Goette, after Julin. But again, we find in some threadworms or nematodes (e.g., Ascaris dactyluris) that the young live at the expense of the mother, until she is reduced to a mere husk. In fresh- water Polyzoa, Kraepelin notes that the ciliated embryo leaves the maternal body-cavity through a prolapsus uteri of the sacri- ficed mother. In the precocious reproduction of some midge larvae (Chironomus, &c), the production of young is fatal through successive -generations. SPECIAL PHYSIOLOGY OF SEX AND REPRODUCTION, 275 Both Weismann and Goette, though with different interpre- tations, note how many insects (locusts, butterflies, ephemerids, &c.) die a few hours after the production of ova. The ex- haustion is fatal, and the males are also involved. In fact, as we should expect from the katabolic temperament, it is the males which are especially liable to exhaustion. The males of some spiders normally die after impregnating the female, a fact perhaps helping to throw light upon the sacrifice of others to their mates. The similarly tiny (ultra-katabolic) male rotifer — an ideal but too unpractical lover, with not even an alimentary canal — would seem usually to fail and expire prematurely, leaving the female to undisturbed parthenogenesis. Every one is familiar with the close association of love and death in the common mayflies. Emergence into winged liberty, the love- dance and the process of fertilisation, the deposition of eggs and the death of both parents, are often the crowded events of a few hours. In higher animals, the fatality of the repro- ductive sacrifice has been greatly lessened, yet death may tragically persist, even in human life, as the direct nemesis of love. The temporarily exhausting effect of even moderate sexual indulgence is well known, as well as the increased liability to all forms of disease while the individual energies are thus lowered. § it. Organic Immortality. — Comparatively little is yet known about the length of life among lower animals, but there is no reason to doubt that all multicellular organisms die. We have just emphasised the view of Goette, and other naturalists, that reproduction is the beginning of death ; which is not inconsistent with the apparent paradox, that local death was the beginning of reproduction. Allowing, then, that multi- cellular organisms at any rate are mortal, and that the very blossoming of the life in reproduction is fated with a prophecy of death which is its own fulfilment, we have to face two questions, — What of death in the Protozoa? and, In what sense is there an immortality throughout the organic series ? Often enough already, in the preceding pages, we have had to reiterate the contrasts between the Protozoa and the higher animals. These firstlings are single cells physiologically com- plete in themselves, and have at least very great, if not un- limited, powers of self-recuperation. They leave off where higher animal life begins, that is to say, in a unicellular state. 276 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. They do not form "bodies." Their reproduction, moreover, is in the majority simple cell-division into two. If there be loss of individuality, there is hardly loss of life. Death is not so serious when there is nothing left to bury. Nor in most cases can one half of the divided unit be the mother individual, and the other the daughter, for the two appear indistinguishably the same. Thus an idea, broached long ago by Ehrenberg, has been revived and elaborated by several naturalists, and especially by Weismann, that the Protozoa are virtually im- mortal. In Weismann's own words, "Natural death occurs only among multicellular organisms, the single-celled forms escape it. There is no end to their development which can be likened to death, nor is the rise of new individuals associated with the death of the old. In the division the two portions are equal, neither is the older nor the younger. Thus there arises an unending series of individuals, each as old as the species itself, each with the power of living on indefinitely, ever dividing but never dying." Ray Lankester puts the matter tersely, "It results from the constitution of the proto- zoon body as a single cell, and its method of multiplication by fission, that death has no place as a natural recurrent pheno- menon among these organisms." Some limitations must be noticed, which make this idea of pristine immortality yet more emphatic. . It is only asserted that the Protozoa escape "natural death," a violent fate may of course await them like any other organisms. They have no charmed life, being as liable to be devoured as those of higher degree. In relation to the environment, however, their sim- plicity gives them a peculiar power of avoiding impending destiny. The habit of forming protective cysts is very general, and thus enwrapped they can, like the ova and a few of the adults of some higher animals, endure even prolonged desic- cation with successful patience, which is rewarded by a re- juvenescence when the rain revisits the pools. But the doctrine of the "immortality of the Protozoa" refers to a defiance of natural, not violent, death. The psychological objection that the original individuality is extinguished when it divides into two, intrudes a con- ception which is hardly applicable. The individualities are doubled, nothing is really lost. Most seriously difficult are those cases where the protozoon produces a series of buds, SPECIAL PHYSIOLOGY OF SEX AND REPRODUCTION. 277 spores, or division units, and leaves a residual core or unused remnant behind to die. But in regard to the gregarines, for instance, where such a remnant is often left, it has been fairly answered that the residue is rather a kind of excretion than the parent left to perish after its reproductive sacrifice. Weis- mann is, however, willing to admit the possibility, that in the suctorial Acinetse, and in the parasitic gregarines, which are both somewhat removed from the normal protozoon type, there may be cases of true mortality. Another point in regard to which experts differ, is whether the Protozoa are really quite self-recuperative. They suffer injuries, they necessarily suffer waste, portions are used up and ejected. The question then arises, Are those acquired defects obliterated, or do they become intensified ? Is the wasting only a local death, or is it the beginning of a true senescence? This is a question which can only be answered by observation ; a priori reasoning is here futile. The most serious criticism of Weismann's view is due to Maupas. Already we have noted his important result, that conjugation is essential to the health of the species. Without this incipient sexual reproduction, the individuals in the course of numerous successive asexual generations grow old. The nucleus degen- erates, the size diminishes, the entire energy wanes, the senility ends in death. Maupas believes that all organisms are fated to suffer decay and death, and protests strongly against Weis- mann's theory that death began with the Metazoa. It must be noted, however, that in natural conditions the conjugation, prohibited in Maupas's experiments, occurs when it is wanted, and the life flows on. Furthermore, in many Protozoa conjugation has not been shown to occur. It seems therefore more warrantable to insert Maupas's result as a saving clause to Weismann's doctrine, than to regard it as contra- dictory. The conclusion at present justifiable, is that Protozoa not too highly differentiated, living in natural conditions where conjugation is possible, have a freedom from natural death. To this must then be added the demonstrated saving clause, that in ciliated infusorians, conjugation, which here means an exchange of nuclear elements, is the necessary con- dition of eternal youth and immortality. Accepting then, with an emphasised proviso, the general conclusion that most, if not all, unicellular organisms enjoy immortality, that in being without the bondage of a "body" 278 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX, they are necessarily freed from death, we pass to consider the second question, What does the death of the higher and multi- cellular organisms really involve? If death do not naturally occur in the Protozoa, it is evident that it cannot be an inherent characteristic of living matter. Yet it is universal among the multicellular animals. Death, we may thus say, is the price paid for a body, the penalty its attainment and possession sooner or later involves. Now, by a body is meant a complex colony of cells, in which there is more or less division of labour, where the component units are no longer, like the Protozoa, in possession of all their faculties, but through division of labour have only restricted functions and limited powers of self-recuperation. Like Maupas's isolated family of infusorians, the cells of the body do not conjugate with one another; and though they divide and re-divide for a season, the life eventually runs itself out. The relation between reproductive cells and the body. The horizontal chain of cells represents a succession of the ova from which the "bodies" are produced. At each generation, a spermatozoon fertilising the liberated ovum is also indicated. A moment's consideration, however, will show that in most cases the organism does not wholly die. Some of the cells usually escape from the bondage of the body as reproductive elements, — as, in fact, Protozoa once more. The majority of these may indeed be lost; eggs which do not meet with male elements perish, and the latter have even less power of inde- pendent vitality. But when the ova are fertilised, and proceed to develop into other individuals, it is plain that the parent organisms have not wholly died, since two of their cells have united to start afresh as new plants or animals. In other words, what is new in the multicellular organism, namely, the " body," does indeed die, but the reproductive elements, which correspond to the Protozoa, live on. This may be made more definite in the preceding diagram. There it is seen that the organism starts like a protozoon, as a single cell, or usually as a union of two cells in the fertilised SPECIAL PHYSIOLOGY OF SEX AND REPRODUCTION. 279 ovum. This divides, and its daughter-cells divide and re-divide. They arrange themselves in layers, and are gradually mapped out into the various tissues or organs. In division of labour, they become restricted in their functions, and specialised in their structure. They become differentiated as muscle-cells, nerve-cells, gland-cells, and so on. The result is a more or less complex " body," unstable in its equilibrium because of its very complexity, composed moreover of competing cells far removed from the protozoan all-roundness of function, limited in their powers of recuperation, and emphatically liable to local and periodic, or to general and final death. But the body is not all. At an early stage in some cases, sooner or later always, reproductive cells are set apart. These remain simple and undifferentiated, preserving the structural and functional traditions of the original germ-cell. These cells, and the results of their division, are but little implicated in the differentiation which makes the multicellular organism what it is; they remain simple primitive cells like the Protozoa, and in a sense they too share the protozoon immortality. The diagram shows how one of these cells, separated from the parent organism (and uniting in most cases with a germ-cell of different origin), becomes the beginning of a new body, and, at the same time, necessarily the origin of a new chain, or rather of a continued chain of fresh reproductive cells. " The body or soma" Weismann says, " thus appears to a certain extent as a subsidiary appendage of the true bearers of the life, — the reproductive cells." Ray Lankester has again well expressed this: — " Among the multicellular animals, certain cells are separated from the rest of the constituent units of the body, as egg-cells and sperm-cells; these conjugate and continue to live, whilst the remaining cells, the mere carriers as it were of the immortal reproductive cells, die and disintegrate. The bodies of the higher animals which die, may from this point of view be regarded as something temporary and non-essential, destined merely to carry for a time, to nurse, and to nourish the more important and deathless fission-products of the unicellular egg." In most cases, as Weismann insists, it is more correct to speak of " the continuity of the germinal protoplasm " than of the continuity of the germ-cells; but, with this proviso, the diagram expresses a fact most important in understanding reproduction and heredity, that the chain of life is in a real 280 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. sense continuous, and that the " bodies " which die are deciduous growths, which arise round about the real links. The bodies are but the torches which burn out, while the living flame has passed throughout the organic series unextinguished. The bodies are the leaves which fall in dying from the con- tinuously growing branch. Thus although death take inexor- able grasp of the individual, the continuance of the life is still in a deep sense unaffected; the reproductive elements have already claimed their protozoan immortality, are already recreating a new body; so in the simplest physical, as in the highest psychic life, we may say that love is stronger than death. SPECIAL PHYSIOLOGY OF SEX AND REPRODUCTION. 28 1 SUMMARY. I. According to Weismann's theory of the continuity of the germ-plasm, a portion of the specific hereditary substance which the fertilised ovum contains is not used up in the development of the offspring's body, but is reserved unchanged to form the germ-cells of the following generation. 2. Sexual maturity generally occurs towards the limit of growth, is marked by liberation of reproductive elements and by secondary characteristics, in part due to the reaction of the .reproductive function on the general system. Precocious maturity may be due to constitutional or environmental con- ditions, and has been of much importance in the evolution of flowering plants. 3. Menstruation may be interpreted as a means of getting rid of the anabolic surplus of the female in absence of its fcetal consumption. 4. Sexual union, at first very passive and random, becomes active and definite with the gradual evolution of sex and secondary sexual organs. 5. Birth is at first accomplished by rupture, but becomes a definite process usually effected through special ducts. Oviparous and viviparous birth only differ in degree. 6. Early nutrition is usually an absorption of the yolk, but in mammals is accomplished by osmotic transfusion from the blood of the mother to that of the foetus. 7. Lactation may be interpreted as an anabolic overflow. 8. Besides milk, there are other secretions associated with the nutrition and sheltering of the young. Pigeon's milk, edible birds' nests, and the mucous threads of sticklebacks, are illustrations. 9. Incubation, reaching * climax in birds, is paralleled in many other classes. 10. Reproduction and death both represent katabolic crises. Primitively, they are nearly akin. Reproduction may ward off death from the Proto- zoon, but in the simplest Metazoa it helped to cause it. II. The Protozoa come nearer immortality than other organisms. The fact of germinal continuity involves an organic immortality. LITERATURE. For the special physiology of sex and reproduction, consult standard text- books, such as those of Foster, Landois and Stirling, and especially Hensen's work already often cited. - On the continuity of the germ-plasma, consult recent translation of Weismann's papers — " Heredity," Oxford, 1889; while a full bibliography will be found in " History and Theory of Heredity," by J. A. Thomson, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1888; and, since 1886, in the Zoological Record. On the nemesis of reproduction, and on organic immortality, see A. Goette, " Ueber den Ursprung des Todes" Hamburg and Leipzig, 1883; and A. Weismann, " Ueber die Dauerdes Lebens," Jena, 1882; " Ueber Leben und Tod," Jena, 1S84; E. Maupas, "Archives de Zoologie expe'rimentale," 1888. 252 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. Beard, J. — The Span of Gestation and the Cause of Birth : a Study of the Critical Period and its Effects in Mammalia. Jena, 1897, ix. and 132 PP- The Rhythm of Reproduction in Mammals. Anat. Anzeiger, XIV. , 1897. PP- 97-102- Beeton, Alice, and Pearson, K. — Inheritance of Longevity. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 1899; Nature, LX., 1899, pp. 356-357. Ellis, Havelock. — Psychology of Sex, Vol. II., 1899. (In great part devoted to a discussion of pathological sexual conditions.) Man and Woman. London, 1894. FerIS, Ch. — Les Perversions Sexuelles chez les Animaux. Revue Philo- sophique, XXII., 1897, pp. 494-503. IIeape, W. — The Artificial Insemination of Mammals. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, LXL, 1897, pp. 52-63. Kohlwey, H. — Arten- und Rassenbildung. Eine Einfiihrung in das Gebiet der Tierzucht. Leipzig, 1897, 72 pp., 5 figs. Lee, F. S. — Physiology of Reproduction in W. H. Howell's Text-book of Physiology. Philadelphia, 1896. Mackenzie, J. N. — Physiological and Pathological Relations between the Nose and the Sexual Apparatus of Man. Bulletin Johns Hopkins Hospital, IX., 1S98, pp. 10-17. Morgan, C Lloyd. — Habit and Instinct. London, 1896, pp. 351. (See chapter on habits of birds, etc., in mating.) Pearson, Karl. — Law of Ancestral Heredity. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, LXII. , 1898, pp. 386-412. The Chances of Death, and other Studies in Evolution, 2 vols. London, 1897. Webster, J. C. — The Biological Basis of Menstruation. Montreal Med. Journal, April 1897, 19 pp. CHAPTER XIX. Psychological and Ethical Aspects. § i. Common Ground between Animals and Men. — Hitherto we have been justifying the orthodoxy of an anatomical train- ing, by almost wholly ignoring the fact that animals have a psychic life, or only mentioning the mere neural aspect of functions. Only in discussing sexual selection, and the general facts of sexual union and of parentage, have we intruded words like "care," "sacrifice," and "love." A purely physiological treatment of sex and reproduction is, however, obviously incomplete. It would be rejected with scorn in reference to human life; it must be equally rejected in regard to the higher animals, which, taken together, exhibit ihe analogues of almost every human emotion, and of all our less recondite intellectual processes. It is with emotions that we have here most to do ; and without raising the difficult question whether animals exhibit any emotions exactly analogous to those which in man are associated with the " moral sense," "religion," and "the sublime," we accept the conclusion of Darwin, followed by Romanes and others, that all other emotions which we ourselves experience, are likewise recognisable in analogous expression in the higher animals. Those which are associated with sex and reproduction are indeed among the most patent; love of mates, love of offspring, lust, jealousy, family affection, social sympathies, are undeniable. § 2. The Love of Mates. — In the lowest animals, where two exhausted cells flow together in incipient sexual union, there is apparently only one component of that most complex musical chord in life which we call "love." There is physical attraction, and the whole process is very much a satisfaction of protoplasmic hunger. In multicellular animals, the liberation of sex-elements is at first very passive. It concerns the individual alone. Fertili- sation is a random matter; and though sex exists, sexual attraction does not, 284 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. A grade higher, true sexual union begins to appear. But at first this simply occurs between any male and any available female. The psychological factor is still but feebly expressecTf there is no genuine pairing, and it would be folly to use the word love in such cases. Gradually, however, for instance among insects, the sexes associate in pairs. There is some psychic sexual attraction, often accompanied with no little courtship, but much more important is the occasional maintenance of the association for a lengthened period. There may even be co-operation in work, as in dung-rolling beetles such as Ateuchus, where the two sexes pursue their somewhat disinterested labours together. The male and female of another lamellicorn beetle {Lethrus cephalotes) inhabit the same cavity, and the virtuous matron is said greatly to resent the intrusion of another male. As degenerate offshoots from the path of psychic progress, or as illustrations of the predominance of merely physical attraction, one must regard such prolonged associations of the two sexes as are seen in the formidable parasitic worm Bilharzia, where the male carries the female about, or in some parasitic crusta- ceans where the positions are reversed. Among the cold-blooded fishes, the battles of the stickle- back with his rivals, his captivating manoeuvres to lead the female to the nest which he has built, his mad dance of passion around her, and his subsequent jealous guarding of the nest, have often been observed and admired. In one of the sunfishes the male and female alternate in guarding the ova. The monogamous habits of the salmon, and the frequently fatal contests between rival males are well known. Carbonnier has beautifully described the elaborateness of sexual display and the ardency of passion in the male butterfly- fish, and also in the rainbow-fish of the Ganges. The amatory croaking of frogs, the love-gambols of some newts, the curious parental care of some male amphibians mentioned in the preceding chapter, and the like, illustrate the continuance of more than crude physical attraction between the sexes. Of many amphibians it may be said that it is only in their sexual and reproductive relations that they seem to wake up out of their constitutional sluggishness. In regard to reptiles, little is known beyond the exhibition of sexual passion and the jealous combats of rival males. Yet Romanes refers to the interesting fact that when a cobra is PSYCHOLOGICAL AND ETHICAL ASPECTS. 285 killed, its mate is often found on the same spot a day or two afterwards. Among birds and mammals, the greater differentiation of the nervous system and the higher pitch of the whole life is associated with the development of what pedantry alone can refuse to call love. There is often partnership, co-operation, and evident affection beyond the limits of the breeding periods, there are abundant illustrations of regard for conventions, there are close analogues of human flirtation, courtship, jealousy, and even crime, though, so far as we understand the matter, there is no convincing evidence of what may be called a distinctively moral judgment. There is no doubt that in the two highest classes of animals at least, the physical sympathies of sexuality have been enhanced by the emotional, if not also intellectual, sympathies of love. Those sceptical on this point should consult such a work as Biichner's " Liebe und Liebesleben in der Thierwelt," or Sutherland's "Origin and Growth of the Moral Instinct" (1898), which contain an overflowing wealth of instances. § 3. Sexual Attraction. — Mantegazza has written a work entitled " The Physiology of Love," in which he expounds the optimistic doctrine that love is the universal dynamic ; and from this Biichner quotes the sentence, that " the whole of nature is one hymn of love." If the last word be used very widely, this often-repeated utterance has more than poetic significance. But even in the most literal, sense there is much truth in it, since so many animals are at one in the common habit of serenading their mates. The chirping of insects, the croaking of frogs, the calls of mammals, the song of birds, illustrate both the bathts and glory of the love-chorus. The works of Darwin and others have made us familiar with the numerous ways, both gentle and violent, in which mammals woo one another. The display of decorations in which many male birds indulge, the amatory dances of others, the love- lights of glow-insects, the joyous tournaments or furious duels of rival suitors, the choice which not a few females seem to exhibit, and the like, show how a process, at first crude enough, becomes enhanced by appeals to more than merely sexual appetite. But it is hardly necessary now to argue seriously in support of the thesis that love — in the sense of sexual sympathy, psychical as well as physical — exists among animals in many degrees of evolution. Our comparative 286 THE EVOLUTION OP SEX. psychology has been too much influenced by our intellectual superiority ; but while this, no doubt, has its correspondingly increased possibilities of emotional range, it does not neces- sarily imply a corresponding emotional intensity ; and we have no means of measuring, much less limiting, that glow of organic emotion which so manifestly flushes the organism with colour and floods the world with song. Who knows whether the song-bird be not besici^^g-Jiairwhat thTcBiiafefiigsician is to the ordinary dulness of our daily toil and thought ? :KJie_ fact to be insisted upon is this, that the vague sexual attraction of the lowest organisms has been evolved into a definite repro- ductive impulse, into a desire often predominating over even that of self-preservation; that this again, enhanced by more and more subtle psychical additions, passes by a gentle gradient into the love of the highest animals, and of the average human individual. But the possibilities of evolution are not ended, and though some may shrink from that comparison of human love with its analogues in the organic series, the theory of evolution offers the precise compensation such natures require. Without recognising the possibilities of individual and of racial evolution, we are shut up to the conventional view that the poet and his heroine alike are exceptional creations, hopelessly beyond the everyday average of the race. Whereas, admitting the idea of evolution, we are not only entitled to the hope, but logically compelled to the assurance, that these rare fruits of an apparently more than earthly paradise of love, which only the forerunners of the race have been privileged to gather, or it may be to see from distant heights, are yet the realities of a daily life towards which we and ours may journey. § 4. Intellectual and Emotional Differences between the Sexes. — We have seen that a deep difference in constitution expresses itself in the distinctions between male and female, whether these be physical or mental. The differences may be exaggerated or lessened, but to obliterate them it would be necessary to have all the evolution over again on a new basis. What was decided among the prehistoric Protozoa cannot be annulled by Act of Parliament. In this mere outline we cannot of course do more than indicate the relation of the biological differences between the sexes to the resulting psychological and social differentiations ; for more than this neither space nor powers suffice. We must insist upon the PSYCHOLOGICAL AND ETHICAL ASPECTS. 287 biological considerations underlying the relation of the sexes, which have been too much discussed by contemporary writers of all schools as if the known facts of sex did not exist at all, or almost if these were a mere matter of muscular strength or weight of brain. The reader need not be reminded of the oldest and most traditional views of the subjection of women inherited from the ancient European order; still less perhaps of the attitude of the ordinary politician, who supposes that the matter is one essentially to be settled by the giving or withholding of the franchise. The exclusively political view of the problem has in turn been to a large extent subordinated to that of economic laissez-faire, from which of course it consistently appeared that all things would be settled as soon as women were sufficiently plunged into the competitive industrial struggle for their own daily bread. While, as the complexly ruinous results of this inter-sexual competition for subsistence upon both sexes and upon family life have begun to become manifest, the more recent economic panacea of redistribution of wealth has naturally been invoked, and we have merely somehow to raise women's wages. All disputants have tolerably agreed in neglecting the historic, and still more the biological factors ; while, so far as the past evolution of the present state of things is taken into account at all, the position of women is regarded as having simply been that in which the stronger muscle and brain of man was able to place her. The past of the race is thus depicted in the most sinister colours, and the whole view is supposed to be confirmed by appeal to the practice of the most degenerate races, and this again as described with the scanty sympathy or impartiality of the average white traveller, missionary, or settler. As we have already said, we cannot attempt a full discus- sion of the question, but our book would be left without point, and its essential thesis useless, if we did not, in con- clusion, seek to call attention to the fundamental facts of organic difference, say rather divergent lines of differentiation, underlying the whole problem of the sexes. We shall only suggest, as the best argument for the adoption of our stand- point, the way in which it becomes possible relatively to harmonise the very diverse outlooks. We shall not so readily abuse the poor savage, who lies idle in the sun for days after 2SS THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. his return from the hunting, while his heavy-laden wife toils and moils without complaint or cease ; but bearing in view the extreme bursts of exertion which such a life of incessant struggle with nature and his fellows for food and for life in- volves upon him, and the consequent necessity of correspond- ingly utilising every opportunity of repose to recruit and eke out the short and precarious life so indispensable to wife and weans, we shall see that this crude domestic economy is the best, the most moral, and the most kindly attainable under the circumstances. Again, the traveller from town, who thinks the agricultural labourer a greedy brute for eating the morsel of bacon and leaving his wife and children only the bread, does not see that by acting otherwise the total ration would soon be still further lowered, by diminished earnings, loss of employment, or loss of health. The actual relations of fisherman and fishwife, of the smallest farmer and his wife, seem to us to give a truer as well as a healthier picture of antique industrial society, than those we find in current literature ; and if we admit that such life is deficient in refinement (although, on all deeper grounds, from religion to ballad poetry, we might even largely dispute this), it has still much to teach in respect of simplicity and health. The old view of the subjection of women was not, in fact, so much of tyranny as it seemed, but roughly tended to express the average division of labour; of course hardships were frequent, but these have been exaggerated. The abso- lute ratification of this by law and religion was merely of a piece with the whole order of belief and practice, in which men crushed themselves still more than their mates. Being absolute, however, such theories had to be overthrown, and the application of the idea of equality, which had done such good service in demolishing the established castes, was a natural and serviceable one. We have above traced the development of this, however, and it is now full time to re-emphasise, this time of course with all scientific relativity instead of a dogmatic authority, the biological factors of the case, and to suggest their possible service in destroying the economic fallacies at present so prevalent, and still more towards reconstituting that complex and sympathetic co-operation between the differen- tiated sexes in and around which all progress past or future must depend. Instead of men and women merely labouring PSYCHOLOGICAL AND ETHICAL ASPECTS. 289 to produce things as the past economic theories insisted, or competing over the distribution of them, as we at present think so important, a further swing of economic theory will lead us round upon a higher spiral to the direct organic facts. So it is not for the sake of production or distribution, of self- interest or mechanism, or any other idol of the economists, that the male organism organises the climax of his life's struggle and labour, but for his mate ; as she, and then he, also for their little ones. Production is for consumption ; the species is its own highest, its sole essential product. The social order will clear itself, as it comes more in touch with biology. It is equally certain that the two sexes are complementary and mutually dependent. Virtually asexual organisms, like Bacteria, occupy no high place in Nature's roll of honour ; virtually unisexual organisms, like many rotifers, are great rarities. Parthenogenesis may be an organic ideal, but it is one which has been rarely realised. Males and females, like the sex-elements, are mutually dependent, and that not merely because they are males and females, but also in functions not directly associated with those of sex. To dispute whether males or females are the higher, is like disputing the relative superiority of animals and plants. Each is higher in its own way, and the two are complementary. While there* are broad general distinctions between the in- tellectual, and especially the emotional, characteristics of males and females among the higher animals, these not unfrequently tend to become mingled. There is, however, no evidence that they might be gradually obliterated. The males of the sea- horse, the obstetric frog, and many birds discharge maternal functions, and there are females who fight for the males, and are stronger, or more passionate than their mates. But these are rarities. It is generally true that the males are more active, energetic, eager, passionate, and variable ; the females more passive, conservative, sluggish, and stable. The males, or, to return to the terms of our thesis, the more katabolic organisms, often seem more variable, and therefore, as Brooks has empha- sised, may have frequently been the leaders in evolutionary progress, while the more anabolic females tend rather to pre- serve the constancy and integrity of the species. There are some cases, as illustrated notably by the contrast between ruffs and reeves, where the greater variability of the l 9 290 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. males along certain lines seems obvious, but, according to Karl Pearson, the doctrine that man is more variable than woman is a pseudo-scientific superstition, based on inadequate or in- admissible data. The examination of seventeen groups of measurements of different parts of the body shows that in eleven groups the female is more variable than the male, and in six the male more than the female. The differences of variability, however, are slight, less than those between members of the same race living in different conditions; they are perhaps due to differences in the severity of the struggle for existence. (See "The Chances of Death, and other Studies in Evolution," 2 vols., London, 1897, pp. 388 and 460.) Along paths where the reproductive sacrifice was one of the determinants of progress, the females must have the credit of leading the way. The more active males, with a conse- quently wider range of experience, may have bigger brains and more intelligence; but the females, especially as mothers, have indubitably a larger and more habitual share of the altruistic emotions. The males being usually stronger, have greater independence and courage ; the females excel in constancy of affection and in sympathy. The spasmodic bursts of activity characteristic of males contrast with the continuous patience of the females, which we take to be an expression of con- stitutional contrast, and by no means, as some would have us believe, a mere product of masculine bullying. The stronger lust and passion of males is likewise the obverse of pre- dominant katabolism. That men should have greater cerebral variability and therefore more originality, while women have greater stability and therefore more "common sense," are facts both con- sistent with the general theory of sex and verifiable in common experience. The woman, conserving the effects of past varia- tions, ha? what may be called the greater integrating intel- ligence ; the man, introducing new variations, is stronger in differentiation. The feminine passivity is expressed in greater patience, more open-mindedness, greater appreciation of subtle details, and consequently what we call more rapid intuition. The masculine activity lends a greater power of maximum effort, of scientific insight, or cerebral experiment with im- pressions, and is associated with an unobservant or impatient disregard of minute details, but with a stronger grasp of PSYCHOLOGICAL AND ETHICAL ASPECTS. 291 generalities. Man thinks more, women feels more. He dis- covers more, but remembers less ; she is more receptive, and less forgetful. § 5. The Love for Offspring. — Just as it is impossible to point to the stage where psychical sympathies enhance the re- productive impulse into the love of mates, so we cannot tell where parental care becomes disinterested enough to warrant our calling it love of offspring. For, as no one can be foolish enough deliberately to ignore the sexual or physical basis of " love " in the higher and highest organisms, so it must be allowed that even maternal care has its selfish side. To take only one example, that of lactation. The unrelieved pressure in the mammary glands of a mother animal robbed of her young is no doubt largely concerned in prompting her to adopt young ones not her own, yet we soon see these estab- lished in her affections. So in normal cases, there naturally remains an alloy which prevents us from regarding even ma- ternal care as altogether disinterested. In all such cases, our interpretations risk an undue materialism on the one hand, and an undue transcendentalism on the other ; and while our modern temper may habitually incline us to the former, we must not be too fond of taking for granted that all the common-sense is on that side, for we must remember that the course of evolution not only has been, but must be, towards the other. Among animals low down in the organic series there is often a close association between mother and offspring. Even in some ccelenterates and worms the offspring cling about the mother animals, and may be protected in various kinds of brood-chambers. The little freshwater leech, Clef sine, carries its young about with it, fixed to its ventral surface. A marine leech, known as the skate-sucker (Pontobdella muricatd), mounts guard for weeks over the eggs which are laid in a bivalve shell or the like. It is probable that this habit has protective value, but whether from active enemies or from accumulations of sand and mud is uncertain. In an aquarium one of these leeches continued to incubate for one hundred and twenty-three days. In some sea-urchins and starfishes there are simple forms of brood-care, but the case of Holothurians is perhaps more interesting. Prolonged attachment between the young ones and the mother is known in at least nine species, of which five 292 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. are antarctic and one arctic. The mode of attachment differs markedly in different forms, thus each of the five antarctic A Sea-cucumber, or Holothurian (Citcnmaria crocca), with numerous young attached to the skin. — From Cams Sterne, after " Challenger" Narrative. PSYCHOLOGICAL AND ETHICAL ASPECTS. 293 species has its young attached in a different way. In Fsolus ephippifer the young develop among the dorsal plates; in Psolus antarcticus, on the ventral surface; in Cucumaria crocea, on the modified dorsal ambulacra; in Cucumaria Itzvigata, in ventral pouches; and in Chirodota contorta, in the genital tubes. (See H. Ludwig, "Zool. Anzeiger," xx., 1897, pp. 217-219.) The A Male " Sea-spider," or Pycnogonid. carrying the ova. — After Carus Sterne. interpretation here evidently does not lie with the morpho- logist; is he not compelled to speculate on the beginnings of psychic life in the strangely rudimental nervous system of these forms from which even definite ganglia seem absent? Yet even here we have motherhood protecting offspring, perhaps all the more because of the prevailing cold; perhaps >94 THE EVOLUTION OK SEX. of course also as a protection from premature burial in soft muddy bottoms. In some lowly crustaceans, the young may return to the shell-cavity of the mother after hatching, and even after they have undergone a moult. The young crayfish are said to return to the maternal shelter after they have been set adrift. The care of the nurse-bees for their charge, though not exactly maternal, deserves to be recalled; and the way in which ants save the cocoons when danger threatens is well known. De [-Clusters ofn cies of Cuttlefish.— Fi i Von Hayek. Geer describes how one of the insects infesting plants behaves to her young brood exactly like a hen with her chickens: and Bonnet vividly describes a case where a mother spider, at the mercy of an ant-lion, fought for her eggs at the sacrifice of her own life. Some spiders, too, carry their young; and some crustaceans swim along with their young ones. Some cuttle- fishes are careful in keeping their egg clusters clean and safe; while even the headless fresh-water mussel retains her young, Psychological and ethical aspects. 295 when there is no fish present to which they may attach them- selves. In fishes, it must be allowed that the care, if at all evident, is usually paternal; in amphibians, it is rare; in Ideal unity! society. of family. Jj offspring. mates. N V R Protoplasmic identity. Diagrammatic Representation of the Relations between Nutritive, Self-Maintaining, or Egoistic, and Reproductive, Species- Regarding, or Altruistic Activities. reptiles, somewhat more marked. In birds and mammals, however, parental care is general, and unquestionably grows into love for offspring. § 6. Egoism and Altruism. — The optimism which finds in 296 'HIE EVOLUTION OF SEJi. animal life only " one hymn of love " is inaccurate, like the pessimism which sees throughout nothing but selfishness. Littre, Leconte, and some others less definitely, have more reasonably recognised the co-existence of twin streams of egoism and altruism, which often merge for a space without losing their distinctness, and are traceable to a common origin in the simplest forms of life. In the hunger and reproductive attractions of the lowest organisms, the self-regarding and other-regarding activities of the higher find their starting-point. Though some vague consciousness is perhaps co-existent with life itself, we can only speak with confidence of psychical egoism and altruism after a central nervous system has been definitely established. At the same time, the activities of even the lowest organisms are often distinctly referable to either category. A simple organism, which merely feeds and grows, and liberates superfluous portions of its substance to start new exist- ences, is plainly living an egoistic and individualistic life. But whenever we find the occurrence of close association with another form, we find the first rude hints of love. It may still be almost wholly an organic hunger which prompts the union, but it is the beginning of life not wholly individualistic. Hardly distinguishable at the outset, the primitive hunger and love become the starting-points of divergent lines of egoistic and altruistic emotion and activity. The differentiation of separate sexes; the production of offspring which remain associated with the parents; the occurrence of genuine pairing beyond the limits of the sexual period; the establishment of distinct families, with unmistak- able affection between parents, offspring, and relatives; and lastly, the occurrence of animal societies wider than the family, — mark important steps in the evolution of both egoism and altruism. The diagram sums up the important facts. There are two divergent lines of emotional and practical activity, — hunger, self-regarding, egoism, on the one hand ; love, other-regarding, altruism, on the other. These find a basal unity in the primi- tively close association between hunger and love, between nutritive and reproductive needs. Each plane of ascent marks a widening and ennobling of the activities; but each has its corresponding bathos, when either side unduly preponderates over the other. The actual path of progress is represented by psychological and ethical aspects. 297 action and reaction between the two complementary functions, the mingling becoming more and more intricate. Sexual attraction ceases to be wholly selfish; hunger may be over- come by love; love of mates is enhanced by love for offspring; love for offspring broadens out into love of kindred. Finally, the ideal before us is a more harmonious blending of the two streams. 298 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. SUMMARY. 1. In most of the emotions, and in the simpler intellectual processes, there is common ground between animals and men. This is especially true of the emotions associated with sex and reproduction. 2. The love of mates has its roots in physical sexual attraction, but has been gradually enhanced by psychical sympathies. 3. The modes of sexual attraction rise from the crude and physical to the subtle and psychical. 4. The intellectual and emotional differences between the sexes are correlated with the deep-seated constitutional differences. Males and females are complementary, each higher in its own way. 5. The love for offspring has grown as gradually as the love for mates. Even lactation and maternal care may be in part egoistic. Apart from exceptional cases, genuine love for offspring is only emphatic in birds and mammals, where the reproductive sacrifice of the mother has also been increased. 6. Egoism and altruism have their roots in the primary hunger and love, or nutritive and reproductive activities. The divergent streams of emotion and activity have a common origin, subtly mingle at various turning-points, and ought to blend more and more in one. LITERATURE. See works on Sexual Selection cited at Chap. I. See also Carus Sterne's most admirable of general natural history books — Werden und Vergehen. Third edition. Berlin, 1886. BiicHNER, L. — Liebe und Liebesleben in der Thierwelt. Berlin, 1879. Eimer, G. H. T. — Die Entstehung dcr Arten auf Grund von Vererben Erworbener Eigenschaften nach den Gesetzen Organischen Wachsens Jena, 1888. Ellis, H. — Man and Woman. Contemporary Science Series. Groos, K.— The Play of Animals. (Translation), 1898. Ma\iegazz;\, P. — Die Physiologie der Liebe; Die Hygiene der Liebe ; and Anthropologisch-Kulturhistorische Studien ilber die Geschlechts- verhaltnisse des Menschen. Jena. Ploss. — Das Weib in der Natur und Volkerkunde. Second edition. Leipzig, 1887. Rolph, W. H.— Op. at. Romanes, G. J. — Animal Intelligence. Internat. Sci. Series. Fourth edition, 1886 ; and Mental Evolution in Animals, by the same. Sutherland, A.— The Origin and Growth of the Moral Instinct -> vols 189S. CHAPTER XX. Laws of Multiplication. § i. Rate of Reproduction and Rate of Increase. — We know- much more about the rate at which organisms reproduce, than about the rate at which the number of adults in reality increases or decreases. The one fact may be ascertained by observation ; the other involves comparative statistics, which are difficult enough to obtain, even for the human species. The rate of reproduction depends upon the constitution of the individual and its immediate environment, including, above all, its nutri- tion. The rate of increase or decrease depends upon the wide and complex conditions of the entire animate and inanimate environment, or upon the degree of success in the struggle for existence. That there are enormous differences in the rates of repro- duction is very evident. Maupas tells us how a single infu- sorian becomes in a week the ancestor of a progeny only computable in millions,— of numbers which the progeny of a pair of elephants, supposing they all lived their natural term of years, would not attain to in five centuries. Again, Huxley calculates that the progeny of a single parthenogenetic plant- louse — supposed again to live a charmed life — would in a few months literally outweigh the population of China. The geo- metrical ratio of reproduction, so often emphasised, would indeed have startling results if it involved real, and not merely potential, increase. That it does sometimes realise itself for short periods or special areas of favourable conditions is well known ; for in- stance, in the periodic plagues of insects, or in the still unmas- tered rabbit pest of Australia. But in the established fauna and flora of a country, without intruded importations or marked climatic changes, the rise and fall of population is seldom emphatic. The rate of reproduction is only one factor in the 3°0 THE EVOLUTION OP SEX. numerical strength of the species or in its increase. The common tapeworm produces myriads of embryos, but these have only one chance in eighty-five millions (it is said) of succeeding. Many common and numerous animals repro- duce very slowly. That some species are on the increase, e.g., bacteria, under the unprecedentedly favourable conditions which our recent " industrial progress " affords, while other species are on the decrease, e.g., many birds, is certain; but the rate of reproduction is not a direct condition in either case. § 2. History of Discussion on Rate of Reproduction. — In this, as in not a few other cases, the biologist is profoundly indebted to the student of social questions, for no adequate attention was paid to the laws of multiplication before the appearance of the epoch-making "theory of population" of Malthus, nor is it yet possible or profitable to isolate the human question from the general one. Malthus's fundamental proposition is indeed usually softened from its earliest form — that population tends to increase in geometrical, subsistence only in arithmetical ratio — into the simple statement that population tends to out- run subsistence, but has none the less served as a base of weighty deductions for both the naturalist and the economist. From Darwin's standpoint, the " positive checks " to population (disease, starvation, war, infanticide), and the "prudential" (moral or birth-restricting) checks, come to be viewed as special forms of natural or artificial selection, while the fundamental induction has been extended throughout nature as the essential condition of the struggle for existence. After long dispute, the induction of Malthus gained acceptance, followed by wide deductive use and abuse, among economists. Yet, fundament- ally important as the subject thus is to naturalist and economist alike, the former has not as yet effected any thorough investi- gation of the conditions of multiplication, or even usually incorporated the keen analysis which we owe to Spencer, while the economic theorist or disputant frequently still employs the doctrine even in its pre-Danvinian form. It is thus doubly needful to summarise, as briefly as may be, Spencer's elaborate statement of the laws of multiplication. § 3. Summary of Spencer's Analysis. — Different species exhibit different degrees of fertility, which have become established in process of evolution like the organisms themselves. To understand this particular adaptation of function to conditions of existence, of organism to environment, we may analyse these into their respective factors. It is evident that in the environ- ment of any species there are many conditions viith which its individuals LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. 30T establish a moving equilibrium, sooner or later overthrown in death. To prevent extinction, the organism meets these environing actions in two distinct ways, — (1) by individual adaptations, active thrusts or passive parries ; (2) by the production of new individuals to replace those over- thrown, — in other words, by genesis. The latter may occur, as we have seen, in varied forms, sexual or asexual, and at various rates, which depend upon age, frequency, fertility, and duration of reproduction, together with amount and nature of parental aid. These actions and reactions of environ- ment and organism admit of another grouping in more familiar terms, into two conflicting sets, — (a) the forces destructive of race ; (b) the forces pre- servative of race. Leaving aside cases in which permanent predominance of destructive forces causes extinction, and also, as infinitely improbable, cases of perfectly stationary numbers, the inquiry is : — In races that continue to exist, what laws of numerical variation result from these variable conflicting forces that are respectively destructive or preservative of race ? How is the alternate excess of one or other rectified? A self-sustaining balance must exist ; the alternate predominance of each force must initiate a compensa- tory excess of the other ; how is this to be explained ? When favourable circumstances cause any species to become unusually numerous, an immediate increase of destructive influences, passive as well as active, takes place ; competition becomes keener and enemies more abundant, and conversely. Yet this is not the sole, much less the perma- nent, means of establishing a balance ; nor does it explain either the differences in the rate of fertility and mortality, or the adaptation of one to the other. This minor adjustment in fact implies a major one. The forces preservative of race were seen above to be two, — power to maintain individual life, and power to generate the species. Now, in a species which survives, given the forces destructive of race as a constant quantity, those preservative of race must be a constant quantity also ; and, since the latter are two, the individual plus the reproductive, these must vary inversely, one must decrease as the other increases. To this law every species must conform, or cease to exist. Let us restate this at greater length. A species in which self-preservative life is low, and in which the individuals are accordingly rapidly overthrown in the struggle with the destructive forces, must become extinct, unless the other race-preservative factor be proportionally strengthened, — unless, that is to say, its reproductive power become proportionally great. On the other hand, if both preserva- tive factors be increased, if a species of high self-preservative power were also endowed with powers of multiplication beyond what is needful, such success of fertility, if extreme, would cause sudden extinction of the species by starvation, and if less extreme, and so effecting a permanent increase of the numbers of the species, would next bring about such intenser competi- tion, such increased dangers to individual life, that the great self-preserva- tive power would not be more than sufficient to cope with them. In short, then, we have reached the a priori principle, that in races which continuously survive, in which the destructive forces are balanced by the preservative ones, there must be an inverse proportion between the power to sustain individual life and the power to produce new individuals. But what is the physiological explanation of this adjustment, and how has it arisen in process of evolution ? Spencer has elsewhere enlarged upon the proposition, which we have already illustrated, that genesis in all its forms 302 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. is a process of disintegration, and is thus essentially opposed to that process of integration which is one element of individual evolution. The matter and energy supplied for the young organism represent so much loss for the parent ; while, conversely, the larger the amount of matter and energy consumed by the functional actions of the parent, the less must be the amount remaining for those of the offspring. The disintegration which constitutes genesis may be complete or partial, and in the latter case the parent, having reached considerable bulk and complexity before reproduc- tion sets in, may survive the process. In the same way, individual evolution may be expressed in bulk, in structure, in amount or variety of action, or in combinations of these ; yet, in any case, this progress of each individuality must correspondingly retard the establishment of the new ones. While in the first portion of the argument, then, it was shown that a species cannot be maintained unless self-preservative and reproductive power vary inversely, it is now evident that, irrespective of an end to be subserved, these powers cannot do other than vary inversely, and the one a priori principle is thus seen to be the obverse of the other. And if we group under the term individuation all those race-preservative processes by which individual life is completed and maintained, and extend the term genesis to include all those processes aiding the formation and perfecting of new individuals, the result of the whole argument may be tersely expressed in the formula, — Individuation and Genesis vary inversely. And from this conception important corollaries open ; thus, other things equal, advancing evolution must be accompanied by declining fertility ; again, if the diffi- culties of self-preservation permanently diminish, there will be a permanent increase in the rate of multiplication, and conversely. In attempting the inductive verification of these a priori inferences, practical difficulties arise, owing to the high complexity of each of our two sets of factors and the independent variability of their details, and thus the total cost of individuation and of genesis alike is hard of estimation and comparison. For this purpose, however, there are successively to be in- vestigated, — (i) the antagonism between growth and genesis, sexual and asexual ; (2) that between development and genesis ; (3) that between ex- penditure and genesis ; and (4) the coincidence between high nutrition and genesis. It is impossible to summarise the wealth of evidence drawn from a wide survey of the animal and vegetable world contained in the chapters devoted to those various heads, but attention may be called to the last and most obscure of these. It is indeed evident a priori that, if the cost of individuation be once provided for, a higher nutrition will render possible a greater propagation, sexual or asexual, and this may be abundantly veri- fied by observation and experiment. Witness the case of aphides, in which the rate of parthenogenetic reproduction is found to be directly proportional to temperature and food-supply ; or, again, that of domestic animals, such as the sheep, whose fertility is in direct relation to richness of pasture and warmth of climate ; or, finally, and most obviously of all, that of field or fruit crops, upon which the influence of increased liberality of manuring will not be disputed. Yet it is sometimes maintained, for both plants and animals, that overfeeding checks increase, while limited nutriment stimu- lates it ; and to support this view there are cited such cases as that of the barrenness of a very luxuriant plant, and the fruitfulness which appears on its depletion. But if this objection really held, manuring would in all cases be inexpedient, instead of only in plants where the growth of sexless axes LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. 3°3 V is still too luxuriant ; and a tree which has borne a heavy crop should, by this depletion, bear again yet more heavily, instead of being more or less barren next year unless manured. Or the difficulty may also be met by interpreting such vegetative luxuriance, not as a case of higher individuation at all, but simply as a case of asexual multiplication of secondary axes ; or again, and perhaps most simply, by regarding the appearance of sexual re- production on depletion simply as a case of the previously demonstrated antagonism between genesis and growth. But again, since fatness is associated with sterility, it is often argued that high feeding is unfavourable to gene- sis. Obesity, however, is now known to be associated with imperfect assimilation, with physiological impoverish- ment or degeneration, — by no means with that constitu- tional wealth which is favourable to fertility. If, in short, we bear in mind that truly high nutrition means only due abundance of, and due proportion among, all the sub- stances which the organism requires, and that their per- fect assimilation by the organism is also needful, such objections to the generalisation not only disappear, but such a phenomenon as the coincidence of returning fer- tility with disappearing obesity affords a confirmatory argument. Organisms having aberrant modes of life are next ap- pealed to for crucial evidence bearing on these general doctrines. Thus, turning to vegetable and animal para- sites, which combine superabundant nutrition with greatly diminished expenditure, the enormous fertility exhibited by all such forms is seen to be the necessary correlative of such a state of nutrition and expenditure, and not merely an acquired adaptation to their peculiar difficulties of survival. The reversion exhibited by so many species (especially among the higher arthropods, e.g., Aphis, Cecidomyia) from sexual reproduction to primitive forms of genesis, is explained by pointing out that such species are peculiarly situated in obtaining abundant food with little exertion. Among bees, ants, and termites alike, the enormous fertility of the inactive and highly nourished- queen-mother are obviously also cases in point. The inverse variation of genesis with individuation has now been demonstrated inductively as well as deductively, and that for each element of the latter (growth, develop- ment, or activity). Yet before discussing its application to the problems of the multiplication of the human species, two points remain, — a question has to be answered, and a qualification made. The question, only partially answered in course of the preceding argument, is, How is the ratio between individuation and genesis established in each special case ? and the answer is, By natural selec- tion. This may determine, whether the quantity of matter spared from individuation for genesis be divided into many small ova or a few larger ones ; whether there shall be small broods at short intervals, A speciesof Onion with asexual vege- tative bulbils (/>) among the flowers 304 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. or larger broods at longer intervals ; or whether there shall be many unpro- tected offspring, or a few carefully protected by the parent. Again, survival of the fittest has a share in determining the proportion of matter subtracted from individuation for genesis. Yet this operation of natural selection goes on strictly under the limits of the antagonism above traced. The needed qualification arises on introducing the conception of evolu- tionary change. If time be left out of account as hitherto, — or, what is the same thing, if all the species be viewed as permanent, — the inverse ratio between individuation and genesis holds absolutely. But each advance in individual evolution (it matters not whether in bulk, in structure, or in activities) implies an economy ; the advantage must exceed the cost, else it would not be perpetuated. The animal thus becomes physiologically richer ; it has an augmentation of total wealth to share between its in- dividuation and its genesis. And thus, though the increment of individua- tion tends to produce a corresponding decrement of genesis, this latter will be somewhat less than accurately proportionate. The product of the two factors is greater than before ; the forces preservative of race become greater than the forces destructive of race, and the species spreads. In short, genesis decreases as individuation increases, yet not quite so fast. Hence every type that is best adapted to its conditions — every higher type — has a rate of multiplication that ensures a tendency to predominate. For though the more evolved organism is the less fertile absolutely, it is the more fertile relatively. The whole generalisation admits of the simplest graphic illustration. For if the line AB represents the aggregate C A ! — , B matter or energies, the structures or the functions, of the organism, of which AC denotes the amount devoted to in- dividuation and CB to reproduction, the inverse variation of AC to CB is obvious, as also if AC and CB represent the psychological obverse of these two classes of function. Nor does an increase in total energy modify this, as when the stronger members of a species frequently also exhibit greater .reproductive power ; for if in one case AB = 20, of which CB=4,'and in another AB = 25, CB may become 5 without any rise of reproductive ratio, since -±1 = 4s- But if the species be evolving, the advance in individuation implies a certain economy, of which a share may go to diminish the decrement to genesis, as above explained. § 4. Spencer's Application of his Results to Ma?i. — In ex- tending this hard-won generalisation to the case of man, the concomitance of all but highest total individuation with all but lowest rate of multiplication (the enormous bulk of the elephant involving a yet greater deduction from genesis) is at once apparent, Comparing different races or nations, or even LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. 305 different social castes or occupations, the same holds good; while the prevalence of high multiplication in races of which the nutrition is in obvious excess over the expenditure is also evident, witness the Boers or French Canadians. Such an apparent difficulty as that of the Irish, in whom rapid multipli- cation occurs despite poor food, is accounted for by the re- latively low expenditure in obtaining it (since the " law of diminishing return " implies its converse for diminishing labour), though, no doubt, also in part by the habit of early marriage, if not by some measure of lowered individuation as well. The main position being established, Spencer proceeds to discuss the question of human population in the future, and insists strongly on the importance of pressure of population, which he regards as the main incentive to progress alike in past, present, and future. Reviewing the possibilities of progress in bulk, complexity of structure, multiplication and variation of func- tion, he concludes that the more complete moving equilibrium, and more perfect correspondence between organism and environment, which such evolution involves, must take place mainly in the direction of psychical development. Yet this development, while stimulated by pressure of population, con- stantly tends to diminish the rate of fertility ; in other words, this cause of progress tends- to disappear as it achieves its full effect. The acute pressure of population, with its attendant evils, thus tends to cease as a more and more highly individu- ated race busies itself with its increasingly complex yet normal and pleasurable activities, its rate of reproduction meanwhile descending towards that minimum required to make good its inevitable losses. § 5. Summary of the Population Question. — The general question, so far as yet developed, may now be conveniently summarised in the accompanying tabular form. Here the stage of knowledge reached by each author, together with any practical applications therefrom deduced, may be read horizontally, while the historic development of each separate line of conceptions may be traced vertically. From such a summary, brief as it is, the main steps in the development of our knowledge are clear enough, but a deeper analysis is required before final exposition or complete appli- cation is possible. Nor, when we note how vast the progress of science through the advance in precision and extension 20 306 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. effected upon the conception of Malthus* by Darwin, will the utility of such increasing elaboration be disputed. Thus the full inductive verification of Spencer's law involves a detailed Author. Development of Theory of Population, Practical Action Deduced. I. Non- bio- logical writers (prede- cessors and op- ponents of Mal- thus). Increase of population does not tend to out- run subsistence. II. Malthus. 1798. Increase of population tends to outrun that of subsistence. But meets checks : A. Positive. B. Preventive. To avoid A, adopt B. III. Darwin. 1S59. Do. Hence struggle for existence ; A. Natural selection. B. Artificial selection. Leading to evolution. Laissez -/aire, i.e., on ac- count of ad- vantage to species from A, avoid B. IV. Spencer. 1852-66. Do. Rate of multiplication investigated for dif- ferent species, and shown to vary inverse- ly as individuation. Do. Do. Also lead- ing to e v 1 u- tion of species. Do. \Individuate. ] comparison of the rates of reproduction of each group of organic species, with their observed degree of individuation (first in each of its factors, and finally in their sum), devia- tions from the inverted symmetry of the theoretic curves (see fig. opposite) having to be separately discussed. Natural selection also requires a yet deeper analysis ; the limits and possibilities of artificial selection are but little known, while * It is also interesting to compare Malthus's view of population, tend- ing to increase in geometrical proportion and substance only in arithmetical - with Spencer's demonstration of the limit of growth already summarised (see p. 220), the more so when we bear in mind that reproduction is dis- continuous growth. The precise statement of Malthus becomes confirmed as regards the cell, if not the cell aggregate. LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. 307 a theory of variation is still far from agreed upon. If how- ever we bear in mind that the amount of evolution in given time is but small our knowledge seems not insufficient for the practical deductions which are so pressingly demanded; yet it is here that the most serious disagreement has prevailed. Thus the Malthusian position is obviously inadequate, in not allowing for the Darwinian one ; yet the converse also is undeniable, for the position of laissez-fab-e, upon which Darwin and Spencer alike take their stand, not only almost ignores the wellbeing of the individual in considering the advance- ment of the species, but is even then too optimistic, since it not only fails to accelerate the progressive evolution which is alone considered, but also fails to provide against the equal possibility of degenerative change. Are we then simply to return to the somewhat crude proposals and excessive hopes for the increase of individual wellbeing due to Malthus or his followers, based too as these have been on imperfect pre- Spencerian knowledge ? The answer is not far to seek, — it lies in the generalisation above estab- lished ; yet it is remarkable that Mr Spencer, after not only establishing the inverse variation of individuation and genesis among species in general, but even showing for the human species in particular that it is essentially upon increase of the psychical activities that the increased individuation and dimin- ished genesis of the future must depend, should not have proceeded to a fuller application. For unless the main generalisation be abandoned, it is obvious that the progress of the species and of the individual alike is secured and accelerated whenever action is transferred from the negative side of merely seeking directly to repress genesis, to the positive yet indirect side of proportionally increasing individua- tion. This holds true of all species, yet most fully of man, since that modification of psychical activities in which his Let the perpendiculars above the line A B denote the increasing degree of total individuation of a series of forms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,_ 6 (say Worm, Fish, Frog, Bird, Man, Elephant), and similarly let the perpendicu- lars to C D represent the rate of multiplication of the same forms ; the curves joining these two series of points respectivelyillustrate by their inverted symmetry the inverse ratio _ of individuation and genesis. 308 the evolution of sex. evolution essentially lies, is far excellence and increasingly the respect in which artificial comes in to replace natural selection. Without therefore ignoring the latter, or hoping ever wholly to escape from the iron grasp of nature, we yet have within our power more and more to mitigate the pressure of population, and that without any sacrifice of progress, but actually by hastening it. Since then the remedy of pressure and the hope of progress alike lie in advancing individuation, the course for practical action is clear, — it is in the organisation of these alternate reactions between bettered environment (material, mental, social, moral) and better organism in which the whole evolution of life is defined, in the conscious and rational adjustment of the struggle into the culture of existence. The practical corollaries of the Malthusian view are celibacy, late marriage, and moral control ; the objections are vice, in- creased mortality in childbirth, and the present low evolution of our moral nature. The practical corollary of the Darwinian doctrine is virtually nil ; the objection, that the survival of what we consider the best types is doubtful, and that the survival of the fit is apt to be cruel. The practical corollaries of the Spencerian principle, although Mr Spencer can hardly be said to have insisted upon these, are individuate and educate. The objection is, that the pressure of population is already felt, and that individuation is a matter of centuries. Furthermore, the effect of education, for instance in reducing sexuality, will tell most where it is least wanted, viz., among the best types. We are therefore bound to include, as a continuation of the above table, the amendment of some of the most thoughtful ex- ponents of what is generally called neo-Malthusian doctrine. This advocates the use of artificial preventive checks to fer- tilisation. Discussion of this proposal is at present difficult, because of the comparative absence of distinctly expressed opinion on the part of medical experts, and because of strong superficial prejudices, not only against the scheme, but against its discussion. These prejudices are, however, dying out, and that is well, for they do nothing but obscure appreciation alike of the merits and demerits of the doctrine. An increasing realisation of the plain facts of reproduction and population must rapidly exterminate the persistently theological absurdities which people utter, if they do not believe on the subject. The vague feeling that control of fertilisation is " interfering with nature," in some utterly unwarrantable fashion, cannot be LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. 3°9 consistently stated by those who live in the midst of our highly artificial civilisation. The strongest prejudice seems to be based in a moral cowardice, which gauges a scheme by its " respectability," while even more culpable is that consciously or unconsciously derived from the profitableness to the capitalist classes of unlimited competition of cheap unskilled labour. For never did the proletariat more literally deserve its name than since the advent of the factory period, their rapid and degenerative increase, indeed, primarily representing " the progress of investments." The general attitude of the modern Malthusian may first of all be roughly indicated by quoting the mottoes which head the organ of their league. " To a rational being, the prudential check to population ought to be considered as equally natural with the check from poverty and premature mortality" (Malthus, 1806). " Little improvement can be expected in morality until the production of large families is regarded in the same light as drunkenness, or any other physical excess " (John Stuart Mill, 1872). "Surely it is better to have thirty-five millions of human beings leading useful and intelligent lives, rather than forty millions struggling painfully for a bare subsistence " (Lord Derby, 1879). Starting from the familiar induction that " population has a constant tendency to outrun the means of subsistence," they recognise in this over-population " the most fruitful source of pauperism, ignorance, crime, and disease." To counteract this there are checks, posi- tive or life-destroying on the one hand, prudential or birth- preventing on the other. " The positive or life-destroying checks comprehend the premature death of children and adull£ by disease, starvation, war, and infanticide." As these positive checks are happily reduced with the progress of society, attention must be concentrated on the other side. " This consists in the limitation of offspring by abstention from marriage, or by prudence after marriage." But as to the first, prolonged abstention from marriage, as advocated by Malthus, this is " productive of many diseases, and of much sexual vice," while " early marriage, on the contrary, tends to secure sexual purity, domestic comfort, social happiness, and individual health." The check that remains to be advocated is thus " prudence after marriage," and by this the neo-Malthusians most distinctly mean attention to methods which will secure that sexual intercourse be not followed by fertilisation. For 310 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. the details of the various methods, we must refer to the Malthusian literature ; but a brief outline is imperative, even for an approximate understanding of the problem. (a.) Thus we have the suggestion that intercourse should be limited to the relatively infertile period most remote from menstruation, when conception may indeed occur, but with less probability than at other periods. Although gynaecologists are disagreed as to the degree of this probability, there can be little doubt that such limitation would have a useful influence, although in itself confessedly incomplete. The so-called artificiality of control is here reduced to a minimum, and the suggestion is obviously in harmony with that increased temperance which all must allow to be desirable. (b.) In the second place, there are methods employed by the males, such as that of withdrawal before the emission of the seminal fluid, a habit common enough both in savage and civilised communities. Fertilisation is in this way ab- solutely prevented, but apart from a more general objection to be afterwards emphasised, such a practice is maintained by some to be injurious to the male, and yet more to the female. Moreover, although the risks of over-population and female exhaustion by child-bearing are here minimised, there is still risk of male exhaustion. (c.) Thirdly, although again under the severe criticism of some of the medical experts, there are means employed by the females, for securing by means of pessaries that the spermatozoa do not come into contact with the ovum, or by means of washes that the male elements are rendered ineffectual. In reply to fche medical objections to both these methods of artificial check, it is answered ((7) that it may in many cases be necessary to choose between two evils, of which the risk involved in the artificial check may be much less than that involved in con- tinued child-bearing ; (b) that it is hardly a fair argument as yet to urge that the proposed checks of neo-Malthusianism are fraught with danger. As to the popularly supposed pre- ventive check of prolonged nursing one baby in the hope of thereby preventing a new conception, it is necessary to em- phasise that nursing does not effect this, and that the prolonga- tion of the lacteal function and diet beyond their natural limits is seriously injurious alike to mother and offspring. Even recognising some of these objections, the neo-Malthu- sians urge the number of distinct advantages, — the reduction LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. 31 1 of the present rapid rate of increase ; the possibility of earlier marriages, and a probable diminution of vice ; an increase in the fitness of the race by lessening the propagation of unfit types and the exhaustion of the mothers by too frequent child- bearing. Supposing, again, the general adoption of the pro- posal, the neo-Malthusians insist upon the possibility of a heightened standard of comfort among the poorer members of the community, and the removal of obstacles to marriage which stand in the way of those who ought to marry but ought not to be parents. Without urging medical objections above referred to, — for in regard to the discussion of these, professional experts must bear the responsibility, — we must emphasise several counter-arguments. Thus it has been maintained, though with no great degree of certitude, that a proposal involving some deliberate and controlled action would tend to be adopted most where least wanted, viz., among the more individuated types, whose numbers would in consequence be proportionately reduced. The diminished rate of increase, which is the most obvious social result of the extensive adoption of neo- Malthusian practices, has long been known to the student of population ; and in some countries, particularly France, — although here, no doubt, to some extent the result Of peculiarly high individuation, — is a recognised national danger, especially since the diminished population, in being largely freed from the normal acuteness of the struggle for existence, loses many of the advantages of this as well. The statistician will doubtless long continue his fashion of confidently estimating the importance and predicting the sur- vival of populations from their quantity and rate of reproduction alone ; but at all this, as naturalists we can only scoff. Even the most conventional exponent of the struggle for existence among us knows, with the barbarian conquerors of old, that "the thicker the grass, the easier it is mown ; " that " the wolf cares not how many the sheep may be." It is the most individuated type that prevails in spite, nay, in another sense, positively because of its slower increase ; in a word, the survival of a species or family depends not primarily upon quantity, but upon quality. The future is not to the most numerous popu- lations, but to the most individuated. And as we increas- ingly see that natural history must be treated primarily from the standpoint of the species-regarding sacrifice rather than 312 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. from that of the individual struggle, we see the importance of the general neo-Malthusian position, despite the risks which the particular modes of its practice may involve. Apart from the pressure of population, it is time to be learn- ing (i) that the annual childbearing still so common, is cruelly exhaustive to the maternal life, and this often in actual duration as well as quality ; (2) that it is similarly injurious to the standard of offspring ; and hence (3) that an interval of two clear years between births (some gynecologists even go as far as three) is due alike to mother and offspring. It is time there- fore, as we heard a brave parson tell his flock lately,. " to have done with that blasphemous whining which constantly tries to look at a motherless " (ay, or sometimes even fatherless) " crowd of puny infants as a dispensation of mysterious providence." Let us frankly face the biological facts, and admit that such cases usually illustrate only the extreme organic nemesis of intemperance and improvidence, and these of a kind far more reprehensible than those actions to which common custom applies the names, since they are species-regarding vices, and not merely self-regarding ones, as the others at least primarily are. To realise the social consequences of sexual intemperance is enough to obviate any hasty criticism of neo-Malthusianism, whatever conclusion may be arrived at as to its sufficiency. It is time, however, to point out the chief weakness in neo- Malthusian proposals, which are at one in allowing the gratifica- tion of sexual appetites to continue, aiming only at the preven- tion of the naturally ensuing parentage. To many doubtless the adoption of a method which admits of the egoistic sexual pleasures, without the responsibilities of childbirth, would mul- tiply temptations. Sexuality would tend to increase if its respon- sibilities were annulled ; the proportion of unchastity before marriage, in both sexes, could hardly but be augmented ; while married life would be in exaggerated danger of sinking into " monogamic prostitution." On the other hand, it seems probable that the very transition from unconscious animalism to deliberate prevention of fertilisation, would tend in some to decrease rather than increase sexual appetite. It seems to us, however, essential to recognise that the ideal to be sought after is not merely a controlled rate of increase, but regulated married lives. Neo-Malthusianism might secure the former by its more or less mechanical methods, and there is no doubt that a limitation of the family would often increase LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. 313 the happiness of the home; but there is danger lest, in re- moving its result, sexual intemperance become increasingly organic. We would urge, in fact, the necessity of an ethical rather than of a mechanical " prudence after marriage," of a temperance recognised to be as binding on husband and wife as chastity on the unmarried. When we consider the inevit- able consequences of intemperance, even if the dangers of too large families be avoided, and the possibility of exaggerated sexuality becoming cumulative by inheritance, we cannot help recognising that the intemperate pair are falling towards the ethical level of the harlots and profligates of our streets. Just as we would protest against the dictum of false physi- cians who preach indulgence rather than restraint, so we muut protest against regarding artificial means of preventing fertilisa- tion as adequate solutions of sexual responsibility. After all, the solution is primarily one of temperance. It is no new nor unattainable ideal to retain, throughout married life, a large measure of that self-control which must always form the organic basis of the enthusiasm and idealism of lovers. But as old attempts at the regulation of sexual life have constantly fallen from a glowing idealism into pallor or morbidness, it need hardly be said that the same fate will ever more or less befall the endeavour after temperance, so long as that lacks the collaboration of other necessary reforms. We need a new ethic of the sexes ; and this not merely, or even mainly, as an intellectual construction, but as a discipline of life ; and we heed more. We need an increasing education and civism of women, — in fact, an economic of the sexes very different from that nowadays so common, which, while attack- ing the old co-operation of men and women because of its manifest imperfections, only offers us an unlimited and far more mutually destructive industrial competition between them instead. The practical problems of reproduction become in fact, to a large extent, those of improved function and evolved environment; and limitation of population, as we are begin- ning to see in regard to the more individual forms of intem- perance, is primarily to be reached, not solely by individual restraint, but by a not merely isolated and individual, but aggre- gate and social, reorganisation of life, work, and surroundings. And while our biological studies of course for the most part only point the way towards deeper social ones, they afford also one luminous principle towards their prosecution, — that thorough 314 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. parallelism and coincidence of psychical and material considera- tions, upon which moralist and economist have been too much wont respectively to specialise. § 6. Rate of Reproduction "Nil" — Sterility. — When we view reproduction in terms of discontinuous growth, — that is, as a phenomenon of disintegration, — it is obvious that complete integration of the matter acquired by the organism into its own bulk, and for its own development, precludes reproduction, — that is, involves sterility, — and similarly as regards the energies of the organism. This is only a re-statement of Spencer's generalisation above discussed ; for it is evident that, if genesis vary inversely as individuation, it must be suppressed altogether if individuation becomes complete. The actual phenomena, however, by no means usually admit of explanation as such realisations of the ideal of evolution, and hence the cause and treatment of sterility mainly pass into the provinces of the experimental naturalist and the physiological physician. From the earliest times, indeed, physician and naturalist, priest and legislator, alike devoted attention to the subject; and it was probably in this way, as a recent monographer remarks, that research became directed to the larger problem of repro- duction in general. The general biological questions — e.g., the relations between sterility within the limits of a species to changes in the environment, or that of sterility among hybrids — are extensively discussed in the copious literature which centres around Darwin's "Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication " ; while with regard to the human species, an extensive medical literature of course exists, to which any encyclopaedia of medicine, or conveniently the recent careful monograph of P. Miiller (" Die Unfruchtbarkeit der Ehe," Stuttgart, 1885), will furnish bibliographical details. LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. 3 15 SUMMARY. J. The rate of reproduction is chiefly determined by the constitution of the organism ; the rate of increase, by its relations to the animate and inanimate environment. 2. The naturalist has to thank the sociologist for directing emphatic attention to the laws of multiplication. 3. Summary of Spencer's analysis. Individuation and genesis vary inversely. 4. In regard to man, Spencer urges the importance of pressure of popu- lation as an incentive to progress, and concludes that man's future evolution must continue mainly in the direction of psychical development, and pre- dicts with the increase of individuation a diminution of fertility. 5. Predecessors and opponents of Malthus denied that increase of population tended to outrun subsistence ; Malthus successfully demon- strated his thesis, and noted the checks which curbed the increase ; Darwin emphasised the advantage of the pressure and checks ; Spencer shows the inverse ratio of degree of development and rate of reproduction ; neo- Malthusians advocate the use of artificial preventive checks to fertilisation. Discussion of these various generalisations and proposals. 6. Completed individuation, were that possible, would be theoretically associated with sterility. LITERATURE. Malthus. — Theory of Population. 1806. Spencer. — Principles of Biology. Lond. 1866. Geddes. — "Reproduction," Ency. Brit.; and Lecture on Claims of Labour. Edin. 1886. Drysdale. — The Population Question. Lond. 1878. Besant. — The Law of Population. Lond. n.d. Clapperton. — Scientific Meliorism. Lond. 1885. CHAPTER XXI. The Reproductive Factor in Evolution. § i. General History of Evolution. — The history of the doctrine of evolution is essentially modern ; for though the idea glim- mered before the minds of many ancient philosophers from Empedocles to Lucretius, it was not till the eighteenth century that naturalists began seriously to apply the conception to the problem of the origin of our fauna and flora. In thinking of the history, it is necessary to distinguish, on the one hand, the gradual growth of the conviction that the theory of evolution is a satisfactory modal interpretation of the origin of animate nature as we know it, and, on the other, the inquiry into the real mechanism of the process. The value of the evolution doctrine as a thought-economising formula was made quite clear by the labours of Spencer, Darwin, Wallace, Haeckel, and others; the real aetiology of organisms, the "how" of the evolution process — is still the subject of searching inquiry and keen debate. The idea of evolution, for so many centuries a latent germ, first took definite shape, so far as biology is concerned, in the mind of Buffon (1749), who not only urged the general con- ception with diplomatic skill and powerful irony, but sought to elucidate the working out of the process. He illustrated the influence of new conditions in evoking new functions; showed how these in turn reacted upon the structure of the organism; and how, most directly of all, changes of climate, food, and other elements of the environment, were external factors evoking internal change, whether for progress or for degene- ration. Contrasted with Buffon in many ways, both in his mode of treatment and in his view of the factors, was Erasmus Darwin (1794), the grandfather of the author of the " Origin of Species." In rhyme and reason, with all the humour and common-sense of a true Englishman, and with a vivid appreciation of life as THE REPRODUCTIVE FACTOR IN EVOLUTION. 3 I 7 more than mechanism, he stated the general conception of evolution, and emphasised the organism's inherent power of self-improvement, the moulding influence of new needs, desires, and exertions, and the indirect action of the environ- ment in evoking these. To Treviranus (writing in 1802-31) — a biologist too much neglected both in his lifetime and since — organisms appeared almost indefinitely plastic, especially however under the direct influence of external forces. His keen analysis of possible factors did not fail to recognise— what Brooks, Galton, Weis mann, and others have since elaborated — that the union of diverse sexual elements in fertilisation was in itself a fountain of change. " Every form of life," he says, " may have been produced by physical forces in either of two ways, either from formless matter, or by the continuous modification of form. In the latter case, the cause of change may be either in the influence of the heterogeneous male reproductive matter on the female germ, or in the influence of other potencies after generation." His contemporary Lamarck (writing in 1801-9) — of greater posthumous fame — fought in poverty like a hero for the evolu- tionary conceptions of his later years. He is well known to .have emphasised the importance of changed conditions in evoking new needs, desires, and activities, urging at the same time the perfection wrought upon organs by increased practice, and conversely the degeneration which follows as the nemesis of disuse. ^Asregards the evolution of plants, he laid the main emphasis on the modifications brought about by the environ- ment. Evolution seemed to him to be due to the interaction of two fates, — an internal progressive power of life ; and the external force of circumstances, encountered in the twofold struggle with the ihanimate environment and with living competitors. The keynote of his system was that adaptive modifications in the bodies of organisms are brought about by changes in function or in environment, or in both, and that these modifications are in some degree at least inheritable. Among the philosophers too, and especially in the minds of those who had been disciplined in physical or historical investigations, the speculations of the ancients were ever taking fresh form, gaining moreover in concreteness. Thus Kant viewed the evolution of species mainly in terms of the mechanical laws of the organism itself, but allowed also for 318 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. the influence of environment, noted the importance of selection in artificial breeding, and, like such ancients as Empedocles and Aristotle, had glimpses of the notion of the struggle for existence. The same idea is more distinct in Herder's " Philosophy of History," where, probably under Goethe's influence, he speaks of the '' struggle, each one for itself, as if it were the only one," of the limits of space, and of the gain to the whole from the competition of individuals. Oken (1809) saw the light of the evolution idea dancing like a will-o'-the- wisp in the mist of his "Urschleim" speculations, and seemed chiefly to interpret the organic progress in terms of action and reaction between the organism and its surroundings ; while in the noble epic of evolution which we owe to his contemporary Goethe, the adaptive influence of the environment and the inherent growth-tendencies of the organism are especially emphasised. Wells in 1813, and Patrick Matthew in 1831, forestalled Darwin in suggesting the importance of natural selection ; but their virtually buried doctrines, however interesting historically, were of less practical importance than those of Robert Chambers, the long unknown author of the " Vestiges of Creation " (1844-53). His hypothesis of evolution emphasised the growing or evolving powers of the organisms themselves, which developed in rhythmic impulses through ascending grades of organisation, modified at the same time by external circumstances, which acted with most effect on the generative system. It is difficult indeed to refrain from amusement or irritation at the naive simplicity with which he evolves a mammal from a bird, by the short and easy method of pro- longing the period of uterine life in favourable nutritive condi- tions ; but though a goose could not so simply give rise to a rat, the emphasis laid on the influence of prolonged gestation is full of suggestion. Apart from his common-sense view of evolution as a process of continued growing, Chambers deserves to be remembered as one of the first to appreciate "the force of certain external conditions operating upon the parturient system." In France, Etienne and Isidore Geoffroy St Hilaire — father and son — denied indefinite variations, regarded function as of secondary importance, and laid special stress upon the direct influence of the environment. To them it seemed not so much the effort to fly, as the (supposed) diminished proportion THE REPRODUCTIVE FACTOR IN EVOLUTION. 319 of carbonic acid in the atmosphere, which had determined the evolution of birds from ancient reptiles. A complete history of evolution theories, up to the publication of the " Origin of Species" (1859), would have to take account further of the opinions of the geographer Von Buch and the embryologist Von Baer, of Schleiden and Naudin, Owen and Carus, and many others ; but no such survey is here our purpose. For it must be already evident from the above brief sketch of representative opinions, that successive naturalists have emphasised now one factor and now another in the evolu- tionary process. To one it seemed as if the organism had a motor power of development — often a metaphysical one, it must be allowed — within itself, and that evolution was to be explained, in Topsian fashion, " according to the laws of organic growth;" to another, function appeared all-important, perfecting organs on the one hand, allowing them to wane in disuse on the other; to a third, organisms were seen under the hammers of external forces and circumstances, being con- tinuously welded into more and more perfectly adapted forms. The intrinsic character of the organism, its function, and its environment, on each of the three factors emphasis was in turn laid. At this juncture Darwin elaborated his theory of " The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection and the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life," and was independently and simultaneously corroborated by Alfred Russel Wallace. They did not indeed deny a spontaneous power of change in the organism itself, nor the influence of function and environment; but, without definitely discussing the origin of variations, sought to show how the destructive or eliminating, and the conservative or selecting agency of the animate and inanimate environment, were the directive factors in evolution. Given a sufficient crop of indefinite variations, — unanalysed or unanalysable as to their origin, — the struggle for existence separated the minority of wheat ears from the majority of tares, and secured a finer and finer harvest. So much had Darwin in his magistral labours to do with making the general conception of evolution current coin, that we can readily understand how not only the educated laity, but the majority of professed naturalists, identified their adherence to the general doctrine with a subscription to the specific principle of natural selection, and in becoming evolu- 320 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. tionists became at the same time Darwinians, that is to say, natural selectionists. Of late years, however, as conflict has passed from the outworks to the very citadel of evolution, — has come, that is to say, to centre round the problem of the origin of variations,- — history has repeated itself. Naturalists such as Nageli, Mivart, and Eimer have championed the cause of internal organismal variations, of evolution in terms of the con- stitution of the organism, of progress according to the definite laws of organic growth. An active school of neo-Lamarckians, such as Cope and Packard, has arisen in America; while Spencer has re-emphasised the importance both of function and of environment as factors in organic evolution, supported more- over in this position by the experimental work of Semper and others. The last published essays of Spencer may be referred to in illustration of the unended state of the controversy, but at the same time, of the growing tendency to limit the importance of natural selection, and as a good instance of successful endeavour to recognise the measure of truth in the different theories. Wallace remains staunchest among the upholders of the theory of natural selection, for his share in which he seems ever to refuse to take to himself sufficient credit; but it is interesting to notice, that in his " Darwinism" (1889), in re-in- forcing his old objections against the importance which Darwin attached to sexual selection, he has made admissions welcome to those of us who believe that the shoulders of natural selection have also been overburdened. As we have already noticed, the phenomena of male ornament are discussed and summed up as being "due to the general laws of growth and develop- ment," so that it is " unnecessary to call to our aid so hypothetical a cause as the cumulative action of female pre- ference." Again, " if ornament is the natural product and direct outcome of superabundant health and vigour," — a view to which the reader of the preceding pages can be no stranger, — -"then no other mode of selection is needed to account for the presence of such ornament." But if the origin of characters so im- portant as those often possessed by males is to be ascribed to internal constitution rather than to the external selection of indefinite variations, the suggestion seems obvious that the origin of this, that, and the other set of characters may also be explained in the same way. A vivid historical account of the evolution of evolution-theory will be found in Osborn's " From the Greeks to Darwin," but a much larger work will be neces- THE REPRODUCTIVE FACTOR IN EVOLUTION. sary if justice is to he done to many who have contributed to working out the most characteristic idea of the nineteenth century. Thus Stuart-Glennie's insight in seeking to bring the laws of inorganic processes into line with the processes of organic evolution has never received due recognition. Before we conclude this historical sketch, we must however refer to the subject of debate re-opened by Weismann, to whom, as one of the foremost of European naturalists, the reader's attention has already been so frequently directed. To a very large extent at least, we and our fathers have believed that characters acquired by the individual organism from Two adjacent animal cells, showing communications through adjacent intercellular substance; also the protoplasmic network, and the nucleus. — After Pfitzner. functional or environmental conditions might be transmitted as a legacy to the offspring. According to Weismann, and not a few others independent of and dependent on him, this has been a delusion. Not only is positive proof of such transmis- sion of acquired characters, i.e., other than those of constitu- tional, congenital, or germinal origin, so scanty and unsatisfactory that His has not hesitated to call the catalogue of cases a mere "handful of anecdotes," but the connection between the body- cells and the sex-elements seems to Weismann and his school so far from close or dependent, that there is a great probability 21 32 2 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. against any " somatic " modification specifically and represen- tatively affecting the reproductive elements, — or, what comes to the same thing, the offspring. If the reproductive elements, in spite of the close connection between all parts of the body, or even between cell and cell (see above fig.), are unaffected directly and specifically by changes in the other parts of the body, then the functional and environmental " modifications " of the body, however important to the individual, are only of indirect importance in the evolution of the race. It has been suggested by Baldwin, Osborn, and Lloyd Morgan that advan- tageous modifications may serve in the struggle for existence as an individual shield until such time as congenital and therefore transmissible variations in the same direction may be estab- lished; but even if this be demonstrated, it remains true that the evolutionary importance of modifications is indirect. If individually acquired characters or " modifications " are of importance only to the individual body, they are obviously of no direct moment in the evolution of the species, — above the level of the Protozoa at least; and, as Weismann himself says, the ground is thus taken from under the feet of Buffonians, Lamarckians, neo-Lamarckians, etc. The ground is left clear for natural selectionists, and the struggle for existence acting on variations remains as the chief factor in the mechanism of evolution. Though we cannot demonstrate that a logical possi- bility has been the vera causa of past evolution, much has been done to establish the probability. But much still requires to be done by actual observation in the present to show that dis- criminate elimination is of frequent occurrence, for it is on the assumption of discriminate, as opposed to indiscriminate, elimi- nation that the case for natural selection rests. To the ques- tion, What starts these variations which natural selection eliminates or fosters? Weismann has suggested various answers: — (a) That the action of the environment on the bodi- less Protists established a multitude of differences of which all subsequent variations in the multicellular organisms are simply permutations and combinations; (b) that a prolific source of variation is to be found in the intermingling or amphimixis of the sex-cells in fertilisation, and in the reduction-processes associated with the maturation of these sex-cells; and (c) that the germ-plasm is provoked to vary by nutritive and other stimuli acting on it from without, or from the enclosing body of the parent-organism. There are many, however, who would THE REPRODUCTIVE FACTOR IN EVOLUTION. 323 still say, that even if none but constitutional or germinal varia- tions are transmissible, we are not shut up to the exclusive adoption of the natural selectionist position. It is still open to the naturalist to demonstrate that many adaptations at least are not explicable as the result of a long process of fostering and eliminating selection among a host of sporadic indefinite variations, but are rather the direct and necessary results of "laws of growth," of "constitutional tendencies," or of the precise chemical nature of the protoplasmic metabolism in the organisms in question. If constitutional variations occur along a few definite lines, as Eimer, Geddes, and others have main- tained in certain cases, then we can understand the origin, though not perhaps the distribution, of species apart from any long process of selection, for which indeed, if variations be strictly definite, the material must be vastly reduced. In other words, we can think of the organism not merely under the moulding influence of its functions, nor solely as the pro- duct of environmental hammering, least of all as the survivor from a crowd of unsuccessful competitors, but as the expression of an internal fate, no longer mystical, but expressible in terms of the dominant chemical constitution. § 2. The Reproductive Factor. — Without further discussion of the still open controversy as to the various factors of evolu- tion, which would not be relevant to such a work as this, we must summarily collate the more prominent opinions as to the share reproduction has in the process. To most of these we have already alluded in the body of the book. (a.) First of all, as to the origin of variations, we find that what Treviranus recognised in the first years of this century — viz., the influence of fertilisation in evoking change — has been emphasised by several, such as Brooks and Galton, and has been especially elaborated by Weismann. As we have already noted, Weismann has suggested that the intermingling of two "germ-plasmas," which is at least part of the essence of fertilisation, may be an important fountain of congenital variations. In apparent contrast is the view advocated by Hatschek, who sees in the intermingling essential to fertilisa- tion a counteractive of idiosyncrasies, a means of controlling and checking disadvantageous individual peculiarities. The two positions are not antagonistic, but rather complementary. (p.) No impartial student of Darwinism can fail to admit, that in the "struggle for existence" stress is laid upon the 324 THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. nutritive and self-maintaining functions and strivings, yet we must remember Darwin's own words: — "I should premise that I use this term [struggle for existence] in a large and metaphorical sense, including dependence of one being on another, and including (which is more important) not only the life of the individual, but success in leaving progeny" ("Origin of Species," p. 50). Similarly, Herbert Spencer says : "If we define altruism as being all action which, in the normal course of things, benefits others instead of benefiting self, then from the dawn of life altruism has been no less essential than egoism. Though primarily it is dependent on egoism, yet secondarily egoism is dependent on it." " Self-sacrifice is no less primordial than self-preservation" ("Principles of Ethics" and " Principles of Psychology"). (c.) Darwin also insisted upon the role of "sexual selection," which implies a recognition of the reproductive factor. We have seen, however, that sexual selection is only a special case of natural selection ; that it seeks to explain the elaboration, not the origin of sexual peculiarities ; and lastly, that Darwin's arguments in favour of the mechanism which he emphasised, have been seriously impugned by Wallace, in an attack which reacts strongly upon the critic's own position. It must not be overlooked, however, that the existence of any form of selective, as opposed to indiscriminate mating, will, if natural selection be at work, tend to accelerate the process of differentiation. (See Pearson's "Grammar of Science," 2nd edition, 1900, PP- 423-4370 (d.) Romanes has recently elaborated, what others seem also to have suggested, the importance of mutual sterility in splitting up one species into several. "Whenever any varia- tion in the highly variable reproductive system occurs, tending to sterility with the parent form without impairing fertility with ' the varietal form, a physiological barrier must interpose, dividing the species into two parts, free to develop distinct histories, without mutual intercrossing, or by independent variation." The reproductive system is very apt to vary, — why, he does not say ; the consequence might readily be, that among the progeny of a parent stock some were fertile inter se, but infertile with the consistent members of the parent stock; these will be isolated by a physiological barrier, just as they might be insulated by a geographical one, and left free to develop along divergent paths of their own. Here THE REPRODUCTIVE FACTOR IN EVOLUTION. 325 again there is recognition of the reproductive factor in evolu- tion ; but how far, and in what cases species have so originated, is obviously a question which would involve discussion of each individual instance. ( J 33 5 fertilisation in, 157, 158; conjugation in, 162; im- mortality of, 275-280 ; alternation of generations in, 221 Psychidse, sex differences in, 27 Puberty, 255 Purkinje, 92 Pycnogonid, male carrying the young, 293 Rate of increase, 299 Rate of reproduction, 299, 300 Rath, Dr O. vom, on telegony, 166; experiments in breeding, 180 Rauber on body and reproductive cells, 100 Reaumur on aphides, 183 Regeneration, 201, 202 Reibmayr, inbreeding, 180 INDEX. 341 Reproduction, different modes of, 145; sexual, 145-166; growth and, 233, 244; theory of, 245- 251 ; in relation to environment, 249 251 ; nemesis of, 272-275 Reproductive cells, 87-124 passim; v. somatic cells, 99, 100, 278- 280 Reptiles, amatory emotions of, 284, 285 Rhumbler, evolution of fertilisation processes, 162 Rhythms of life, 238, 239 Richarz, 39 Rolph on antlers, 26 ; sex in wasps, 48 ; theory of sex, 1 30 ; theory of fertilisation, 172, 173 ; partheno- genetic ova, 192, 195 Romanes, G. J., 140; on physio- logical selection, 324 Rorig on castration, 24 : antlers and reproductive organs, 256 Rotifers, parthenogenesis in, 1 87 ; male, 275 Sabatier, theory of polarities, 1 14 Sachs, origin of fertilisation, 161, 162, 172 Sadler on determination of sex, 38 Salensky on primitive metazoa, 329 Salmon, 259 Salpa, alternation of generations in, 2t6 Schaffer, parthenogenesis in crusta- ceans, 185 Schaudinn on reduction division, "3 Schenk's theory, 52 Schizogamy, 209 Schlechter on sex in horses, 54 Schleiden, 92, 14S Schultze, two kinds of ova, 36 Schwann, 92 Sea-anemones, asexual multiplica- tion in, 207 Sea-horse, parental care in male, 271, 272 Seasonal parthenogenesis, 187 Secondary sexual characters, 3-8, r6-27 Self-fertilisation, 79 Sellheim on castration, 24, 256 Seminal vesicles, 255 Sex, determination of, 34-57 ! theory of, 130-140; origin of, 135; special physiology of, 253- 282 Sexes, differences between the, in general habit, 16-19; in size, 19; in other characters, 21 ; intel- lectual and emotional differences, 286 Sex-elements, the ultimate, 87-102, general origin of, 97 ; early separa- tion of, 98 Sexual attraction, 285 Sexual diathesis, 23 Sexual maturation, 255 Sexual organs and tissues, 63-69 Sexual reproduction, 145-158 Sexual selection, 8-14 ; its limits as an explanation, 27 Sexual union, 245 247 Shufeldt on sex in birds, 36 Siebold, Von, experiments on wasps, 48; on sperms, 118; parthenogenesis, 184, 186, 188 Silkmoth, parthenogenesis in, 185 Silvestri on sperms, 1 19 Simon, origin of sex, 173 ; par- thenogenetic ova, 193 Siphonophore colony, 207 Skin-outgrowths, 26 Snail, reproductive specialisation in, 68 Spallanzani on fertilisation, .170 Spencer, theory of growth, 234 ; laws of multiplication, 30J ; population question, 299 ; factors in evolution, 320 Spermatogenesis, 122 Spermatic animalcule, 118 Spermatozoon, 117-128; discovery of, 117; structure of, 118-120; physiology, 120 ; contrasted with ovum, 123; influence of, 317 Spermatozoa of crayfish, 119 Spiculum amoris, 263 Spiegelberg, 41 Spirogyra, conjugation in, 160 Sponge, hermaphroditism in, 76 ; colony of, 201 ; asexual multipli- cation in, 205 ; alternation of generations in Spongilla, 222 Life of Bunyan. By Canon Venables. " A most intelligent, appreciative, and valuable memoir." — Scotsman. Life of Burns. By Professor Blackie. "The editor certainly made a hit when he persuaded Blackie to write about Burns." — Pall Mall Gazette. Life of Byron. By Hon. Roden Noel. " He [Mr. Noel] has at any rate given to the world the most credible and comprehensible portrait of the poet ever drawn with pen and ink." — Manchester Examiner. Life of Thomas Carlyle. By R. Qarnett, LL.D. " This is an admirable book. Nothing could be more felicitous and fairer than the way in which he takes us through Carlyle's life and works." — Pall Mall Gazette. Life of Cervantes. By H. E. Watts. " Let us rather say that no volume of this series, nor, so far as we can recollect, of any of the other numerous similar series, presents the facts of the subject in a more workmanlike style, or with more exhaustive know- ledge. " — Manchester Guardian. Life of Coleridge. By Hall Caine. " Brief and vigorous, written throughout with spirit and great literary skill. " — Scotsman. Life of Congreve. By Edmund Gosse. " Mr. Gosse has written an admirable and most interesting biography of a man of letters who is of particular interest to other men of letters." — The Academy. Life of Crabbe. By T. E. Kebbel. "No English poet since Shakespeare has observed certain aspects of nature and of human life more closely; and in the qualities of manliness and of sincerity he is surpassed by none. . . . Mr. Kebbel's monograph is worthy of the subject." — Athenaum. Lifelof Darwin. By G. T. Bettany. " Mr. G. T. Bettany's Life of Darwin is a sound and conscientious work." — Saturday Review. Life of Dickens. By Frank T. Marzials. " Notwithstanding the mass of matter that has been printed relating to Dickens and his works, ... we should, until we came across this volume, have been at a loss to recommend any popular life of England's most popular novelist as being really satisfactory. The difficulty is removed by Mr. Marzials' little book." — Athenctum. Life of George Eliot. By Oscar Browning. " We are thankful for this interesting addition to our knowledge of the great novelist. " — Literary World. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. Life of Emerson. By Richard Qarnett, LL.D. "As to the larger section of the public, to whom the series of Great Writers is addressed, no record of Emerson's life and work could be more desirable, both in breadth of treatment and lucidity of style, than Dr. Garnett's." — Saturday Review. Life of Goethe. By James Sime. "Mr. James Sime's competence as a biographer of Goethe, both in respect of knowledge of his special subject, and of German literature generally, is beyond question." — Manchester Guardian. Life of Goldsmith. By Austin Dobson. "The story of his literary and social life in London, with all its humorous and pathetic vicissitudes, is here retold as none could tell it better." — Daily News. Life of Nathaniel Hawthorne. By Moncure Conway. " Easy and conversational as the tone is throughout, no important fact is omitted, no useless fact is recalled." — Speaker. Life of Heine. By William Sharp. "This is an admirable monograph, . . . more fully written up to the level of recent knowledge and criticism of its theme than any other English work. " — Scotsman. Life of Victor Hugo. By Frank T. Marzials. " Mr. Marzials' volume presents to us, in a more handy form than any English, or even French, handbook gives, the summary of what, up to the moment in which we write, is known or conjectured about the life of the great poet. " — Saturday Review. Life of Hunt. By Cosmo Monkhouse. " Mr. Monkhouse has brought together and skilfully set in order much widely scattered material." — Athenceum. Life of Samuel Johnson. By Colonel F. Grant. " Colonel Grant has performed his task with diligence, sound judgment good taste, and accuracy." — Illustrated London News. Life of Keats. By W. M. Rossetti. " Valuable for^the ample information which it contains." — Cambridge Independent. Life of Lessing. By T. W. Rolleston. "A picture of Lessing which is vivid and truthful, and has enough of detail for all ordinary purposes."— Nation (New York). New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. Life of Longfellow. By Prof. Eric S. Robertson. " A most readable little book." — Liverpool Mercury. Life of Marryat. By David Hannay. " What Mr. Hannay had to do — give a craftsman-like account of a great craftsman who has been almost incomprehensibly undervalued — could hardly have been done better than in this little volume." — Man- chester Guardian. Life of Mill. By W. L. Courtney. " A most sympathetic and discriminating memoir." — Glasgow Herald. Life of Milton. By Richard Qarnett, LL.D. " Within equal compass the life-story of the great poet of Puritanism has never been more charmingly or adequately told." — Scottish Leader. Life of Renan. By Francis Espinasse. " Sufficiently full in details lo give us a living picture of the great scholar, . . . and never tiresome -or dull." — Westminster Review. Life of Dante Gabriel Rossetti. By J. Knight. " Mr. Knight's picture of the great poet and painter is the fullest and best yet presented to the public." — The Graphic. Life of Schiller. By Henry W. Nevinson. " This is a well-written little volume, which presents the leading facts of the poet's life in a neatly rounded picture. " — Scotsman. " Mr. Nevinson has added much to the charm of his book by his spirited translations, which give excellently both the ring and sense of the original. " — Manchester Guardian. Life of Arthur Schopenhauer. By William Wallace. "The series of Great Writers has hardly had a contribution of more marked and peculiar excellence than the book which the Whyte Professor of Moral Philosophy at Oxford has written for it on the attractive and still (in England) little-known subject of Schopenhauer." — Manchester Guardian. Life of Scott. By Professor Yonge. " For readers and lovers of the poems and novels of Sir Walter Scott this is a most enjoyable book." — Aberdeen Free Press. Life of Shelley. By William Sharp " The criticisms . . . entitle this capital monograph to be ranked with the best biographies of Shelley." — Westminster Review. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. Life of Sheridan. By Lloyd Sanders. "To say that Mr. Lloyd Sanders, in this volume, has produced the best existing memoir of Sheridan is really to award much fainter praise than the book deserves." — Manchester Guardian. " Rapid and workmanlike in style, the author has evidently a good practical knowledge of the stage of Sheridan's day. "— Saturday Review. Life of Adam Smith. By R. B. Haldane, M.P. ' ' Written with a perspicuity seldom exemplified when dealing with economic science." — Scotsman. " Mr. Haldane's handling of his subject impresses us as that of a man who well understands his theme, and who knows how to elucidate it." — Scottish Leader. " A beginner in political economy might easily do worse than take Mr. Haldane's book as his first text-book." — Graphic. Life of Smollett. By David Hannay. " A capital record of a writer who still remains one of the great masters of the English novel." — Saturday Review. " Mr. Hannay is excellently equipped for writing the life of Smollett. As a specialist on the history of the eighteenth century navy, he is at a great advantage in handling works so full of the sea and sailors as Smollett's three principal novels. Moreover, he has a complete acquaint- ance with the Spanish romancers, from whom Smollet drew so much of his inspiration. His criticism is generally acute and discriminating; and his narrative is well arranged, compact, and accurate." — St. James's Gazette. Life of Thackeray. By Herman Merivale and Frank T. Marzials. "The book, with its excellent bibliography, is one which neither the student nor the general reader can well afford to miss." — Pall Mall Gazette. "The last book published by Messrs. Merivale and Marzials is full of very real and true things." — Mrs. Anne Thackeray Ritchie on " Thackeray and his Biographers," in Illustrated London News. Life of Thoreau. By H. S. Salt. "Mr. Salt's volume ought to do much towards widening the know- ledge and appreciation in England of one of the most original men ever produced by the United States." — Illustrated London News. Life of Voltaire. By Francis Espinasse. " Up to date, accurate, impartial, and bright without any trace of affectation. " — Academy. Life of Whittier. By W. J. Linton. "Mr. Linton is a sympathetic and yet judicious critic of Whittier. " — World. Complete Bibliography to each volume, by J. P. Anderson, British Museum, London. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. " An excellent series." — Telegraph. "Excellently translated, beautifully bound, and elegantly printed." — Liverpool Mercury. ' ' Notable for the high standard of taste and excellent judgment that characterise their editing, as well as for the brilliancy of the literature that they contain." — Boston Gazette, U.S.A. Library of Humour. Cloth Elegant, Large 12 mo, Price $1.25 per vol. VOLUMES ALREADY ISSUED. The Humour of France. Translated, with an Introduction and Notes, by Elizabeth Lee. With numerous Illustrations by Paul Frenzeny. The Humour of Germany. Translated, with an Introduc- tion and Notes, by Hans Muller-Casenov. With numerous Illus- trations by C. E. Brock. The Humour of Italy. Translated, with an Introduction and Notes, by A. Werner. With 50 Illustrations and a Frontispiece by Arturo Fieldi. The Humour of America. Selected, with a copious Bio- graphical Index of American Humorists, by James Barr. The Humour of Holland. Translated, with an Introduction and Notes, by A. Werner. With numerous Illustrations by Dudley Hardy. The Humour of Ireland. Selected by D. J. O'Donoghue. With numerous Illustrations by Oliver Paque. The Humour of Spain, Translated, with an Introduction and Notes, by Susette M. Taylor. With numerous Illustrations by H. R. Millar. The Humour of Russia. Translated, with [Notes, by E. L. Boole, and # an Introduction by Stepniak. With 50 Illustra- tions by Paul Frenzeny. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. In One Volume. Crown 8vo, Cloth, Richly Gilt. Price $1.25. Musicians t Wit, Humour, and Anecdote : BEING ON DITS OF COMPOSERS, SINGERS, AND INSTRUMENTALISTS OF ALL TIMES. By FREDERICK J. CROWEST, Author of "The Great Tone Poets," "The Story of British Music"; Editor of "The Master Musicians" Series, etc., etc. Profusely Illustrated with Quaint Drawings by J. P. Donne. WHAT ENGLISH REVIEWERS SAY:— "It is one of those delightful medleys of anecdote of all times, seasons, and persons, in every page of which there is a new specimen of humour, strange adventure, and quaint saying." — T. P. O'Connor in T. P.'s Weekly. "A remarkable collection of good stories which must have taken years of perseverance to get together. " — Morning Leader. "A book which should prove acceptable to two large sections of the public — those who are interested in musicians and those who have an adequate sense of the comic." — Globe. THE USEFUL RED SERIES. Red Cloth, Pocket Size, Price 50 Cents. NEW IDEAS ON BRIDGE. By Archibald Dunn, Jun. INDIGESTION: Its Prevention and Cure. By F. Herbert Alderson, M.B. ON CHOOSING A PIANO; By Algernon Rose. CONSUMPTION : Its Nature, Causes, Prevention, and Cure. By Dr. Sicard de Plauzoles. BUSINESS SUCCESS. By G. G. Millar. PETROLEUM. By Sydney H. North. DIET AND HYGIENE. By F. Herbert Alderson, M.B. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. 'Tbe Music Story Series. A SERIES OF LITERARY-MUSICAL MONOGRAPHS. Edited by FREDERICK J. CROWEST, Author of "The Great Tone Poets," etc., etc. Illustrated with Photogravure and Collotype Portraits, Half-tone and Line Pictures, Facsimiles, etc. Square Crown 8vo, Cloth, $1.25 net. VOLUMES NOW READY. THE STORY OF ORATORIO. By ANNIE W. PATTER- SON, B.A., Mus. Doc. THE STORY OF NOTATION. By C. F. ABDY WILLIAMS, M.A., Mus. Bac. THE STORY OF THE ORGAN. By C. F. ABDY WILLIAMS, M.A., Author of "Bach" and "Handel" ("Master Musicians' Series"). THE STORY OF CHAMBER MUSIC. By N. KILBURN, Mus. Bac. (Cantab.). THE STORY OF THE VIOLIN. By PAUL STOEVING, Professor of the Violin, Guildhall School of Music, London. THE STORY OF THE HARP. By WILLIAM H. GRATTAN FLOOD, Author of " History of Irish Music." THE STORY OF ORGAN MUSIC. By C. F. ABDY WILLIAMS, M.A., Mus. Bac. THE STORY OF ENGLISH MUSIC (1604- 1904): being the Worshipful Company of Musicians' Lectures. THE STORY OF ENGLISH MINSTRELSY. By EDMOND- STOUNE DUNCAN. IN PREPARATION. THE STORY OF THE PIANOFORTE. By ALGERNON S. ROSE, Author of " Talks with Bandsmen." THE STORY OF MUSICAL SOUND. By CHURCHILL SIBLEY, Mus. Doc. THE STORY OF CHURCH MUSIC. By THE EDITOR. ETC., ETC., ETC. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. The Makers of British Art. A Series of Illustrated Monographs Edited by James A. Manson. Illustrated with Photogravure Portraits ; Half-tone and Line Reproductions of the Best Pictures. Square Crown 8vo, Cloth, $1.25 net. LANDSEER, SIR EDWIN. By the EDITOR. "This little volume may rank as the most complete account of Landseer that the world is likely to possess." — "limes. REYNOLDS, SIR JOSHUA. By ELSA D'ESTERRE- KEELING. " An admirable little volume . . . Miss Keeling writes very justly and sympathetically." — Daily Telegraph. " Useful as a handy work of reference." — Athenceum. TURNER, J. W. M. By ROBERT CHIGNELL, Author of "The Life and Paintings of Vicat Cole, R.A." " This book is thoroughly competent, and at the same time it is in the best sense popular in style and treatment." — Literary World. ROMNEY, GEORGE. By Sir HERBERT MAXWELL, Bart., F.R.S. " Sir Herbert Maxwell's brightly-written and accurate monograph will not disappoint even exacting students, whilst its charming reproductions are cer- tain to render it an attractive gift-book." — Standard. " It is a pleasure to read such a biography as this, so well considered, and writterr with such insight and literary skill." — Daily News. WILKIE, SIR DAVID. By Professor BAYNE. CONSTABLE, JOHN. By the EARL OF PLYMOUTH. RAEBURN, SIR HENRY. By EDWARD PINNINGTON. GAINSBOROUGH, THOMAS. By A. E. FLETCHER. HOGARTH, WILLIAM. By Prof. G. BALDWIN BROWN. MOORE, HENRY. By FRANK J. MACLEAN. LEIGHTON, LORD. By EDGCUMBE STALEY. MORLAND, GEORGE. By D. H. WILSON, M.A., LL.M. IN PREPARATION. MI LLAIS — WATTS, Etc. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. The Contemporary Science Series. Edited by Havelock Ellis. i2tno. Cloth. Price $1.50 per Volume. I. THE EVOLUTION OF SEX. By Prof. Patrick Geddes and J. A. Thomson. With 90 Illustrations. Second Edition. " The authors have brought to the task — as indeed their names guarantee — a wealth of knowledge, a lucid and attractive method of treatment, and a rich vein of picturesque language." — Nature. II. ELECTRICITY IN MODERN LIFE. By G. W. de Tunzelmann. With 88 Illustrations. " A clearly written and connected sketch of what is known about elec- tricity and magnetism, the more prominent modern applications, and the principles on which they are based." — Saturday Review. III. THE ORIGIN OF THE ARYANS. By Dr. Isaac Taylor. Illustrated. Second Edition. " Canon Taylor is probably the most encyclopaedic all-round scholar now living. His new volume on the Origin of the Aryans is a first-rate example of the excellent account to which he can turn his exceptionally wide and varied information. . . . Masterly and exhaustive. " — Pall Mall Gazette. IV. PHYSIOGNOMY AND EXPRESSION. By P. Mante- GAZZA. Illustrated. " Brings this highly interesting subject even with the latest researches. . . . Professor Mantegazza is a writer full of life and spirit, and the natural attractiveness of his subject is not destroyed by his scientific handling of it." — Literary World (Boston). V. EVOLUTION AND DISEASE. By J. B. Sutton, F.R.C.S. With 135 Illustrations. "The book is as interesting as a novel, without sacrifice of accuracy or system, and is calculated to give an appreciation of the fundamentals of pathology to the lay reader, while forming a useful collection of illustrations of disease for medical reference."—; Journal of Mental Science. VI. THE VILLAGE COMMUNITY. By G. L. Gomme. Illustrated. " His book will probably remain for some time the best work of reference for facts bearing on those traces of the village community which have not been effaced by conquest, encroachment, and the heavy hand of Roman law." — Scottish Leader. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. VII. THE CRIMINAL. By Havelock Ellis. Illustrated Second Edition. "The sociologist, the philosopher, the philanthropist, the novelist — all, indeed, for whom the study of human nature has any attraction— will find Mr. Ellis full of interest and suggestiveness." — Academy. VIII. SANITY AND INSANITY. By Dr. Charles Mercier. Illustrated. "Taken as a. whole, it is the brightest book on the physical side of mental science published in our time." — Pall Mall Gazette. IX. HYPNOTISM. By Dr. Albert Moll. Fourth Edition. " Marks a step of some importance in the study of some difficult physio- logical and psychological problems which have not yet received much attention in the scientific world of England." — Nature. X. MANUAL TRAINING. By Dr. C. M. Woodward, Directoi of the Manual Training School, St. Louis. Illustrated. " There is no greater authority on the subject than Professor Woodward." — Manchester Guardian. XL THE SCIENCE OF FAIRY TALES. By E. Sidney Hartland. " Mr. Hartland's book will win the sympathy of all earnest students, both by the knowledge it displays, and by a thorough love and appreciation of his subject, which is evident throughout." — Spectator. XII. PRIMITIVE FOLK. By Elie Reclus. "An attractive and useful introduction to the study of some aspects of ethnography. " — Nature. XIII. THE EVOLUTION OF MARRIAGE. By Professor Letourneau. ' ' Among the distinguished French students of sociology, Professor Letour- neau has long stood in the first rank. He approaches the great study of man free from bias and shy of generalisations. To collect, scrutinise, and appraise facts is his chief business. In the volumejoefore us he shows these qualities in an admirable degree." — Science. XIV. BACTERIA AND THEIR PRODUCTS. By Dr. G. SlMS Woodhead. Illustrated. Second Edition. "An excellent summary of the present state of knowledge of the subject." — Lancet. XV. EDUCATION AND HEREDITY. By J. M. Guyau. "It is at once a treatise on sociology, ethics, and pedagogics. It is doubtful whether, among all the ardent evolutionists who have had their say on the moral and the educational question, any one has carried forward the new doctrine so boldly to its extreme logical consequence." — Professor Sully in Mind. New York : Chari.es Scribner's Sons. XVI. THE MAN OF GENIUS. By Prof. Lombroso. Illus- trated. "By far the most comprehensive and fascinating collection of facts and generalisations concerning genius which has yet been brought together." — Journal of Mental Science. XVII. THE HISTORY OF THE EUROPEAN FAUNA. By R. F. Scharff, B.Sc, Ph.D., F.Z.S. Illustrated. XVIII. PROPERTY : ITS ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT. By Ch. Letourneau, General Secretary to the Anthro- pological Society, Paris, and Professor in the School of Anthro- pology, Paris. " M. Letourneau has read a great deal, and he seems to us to have selected and interpreted his facts wilh considerable judgment and learning." — Westminster Review.. XIX. VOLCANOES, PAST AND PRESENT. By Prof. Edward Hull, LL.D., F.R.S. " A very readable account of the phenomena of volcanoes and earth- quakes. " — Nature. XX. PUBLIC HEALTH. By Dr. J. F. J. Sykes. With numerous Illustrations. " Not by any means a mere compilation or a dry record of details and statistics, but it takes up essential points in evolution, environment, prophy- laxis, and sanitation bearing upon the preservation of public health." — Lancet. XXI. MODERN METEOROLOGY. An Account of the Growth and Present Condition of some Branches of Meteorological Science. By Frank Waldo, Ph.D., Member of the German and Austrian Meteorological Societies, etc.; late Junior Professor, Signal Service, U.S.A. With 112 Illustrations. "The present volume is the best on the subject for general use that we have seen." — Daily Telegraph (London). XXII. THE GERM-PLASM : A THEORY OF HEREDITY. By August Weismann, Professor in the University of Freiburg-in-Breisgau. With 24 Illustrations. $2.50. "There has been no work published since Darwin's own books which has so thoroughly handled the matter treated by him, or has done so much to place in order and clearness the immense complexity of the factors of heredity, or, lastly, has brought to light so many new facts and considerations bearing on the subject." — British Medical Journal. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. XXIII. INDUSTRIES OF ANIMALS. By E. F. Houssay. With numerous Illustrations. " His accuracy is undoubted, yet his facts out-marvel all romance. These facts are here made use of as materials wherewith to form the mighty fabric of evolution." — Manchester Guardian. XXIV. MAN AND WOMAN. By Havelock Ellis. Illus- trated. Fourth and Revised Edition. " Mr. Havelock Ellis belongs, in some measure, to the continental school of anthropologists ; but while equally methodical in the collection of facts, he is far more cautious in the invention of theories, and he has the further distinction of being not only able to think, but able to write. His book is a sane and impartial consideration, from a psychological and anthropological point of view, of a subject which is certainly of primary interest." — Athenceum. XXV. THE EVOLUTION OF MODERN CAPITALISM. By John A. Hobson, M.A. (New and Revised Edition.) " Every page affords evidence of wide and minute study, a weighing of facts as conscientious as it is acute, a keen sense of the importance of certain points as to which economists of all schools have hitherto been confused and careless, and an impartiality generally so great as to give no indication of his [Mr. Hobson's] personal sympathies." — Pall Mall Gazette. XXVI. APPARITIONS AND THOUGHT TRANSFER- ENCE. By Frank Podmore, M.A. "A very sober and interesting little book. . . . That thought-transfer- ence is a real thing, though not perhaps a very common thing, he certainly shows. " — Spectator. XXVII. AN INTRODUCTION TO COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY. By Professor C. Lloyd Morgan. With Diagrams. " A strong and complete exposition of Psychology, as it takes shape in a mind previously informed with biological science. . . . Well written, ex- tremely entertaining, and intrinsically valuable." — Saturday A'eview. XXVIII. THE ORIGINS OF INVENTION : A Study of Industry among Primitive Peoples. By Otis T. Mason, Curator of the Department of Ethnology in the United States National Museum. "A valuable history of the development of the inventive faculty." — NaUire. XXIX. THE GROWTH OF THE BRAIN: A Study of the Nervous System in relation to Education. By Henry Herbert Donaldson, Professor of Neurology in the University of Chicago. " We can Fay with confidence that Professor Donaldson has executed his work with much care, judgment, and discrimination." — The Lancet. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. XXX. EVOLUTION IN ART: As Illustrate-., by the Life-Histories of Designs. By Professor Alfred C. Haddon. With 130 Illustrations. " It is impossible to speak too highly of this most unassuming and invaluable book."— -Journal of Anthropological Institute. XXXI. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE EMOTIONS. By Th. Ribot, Professor at the College of France, Editor of the Revue Philosophique. "Professor Ribot's treatment is careful, modern, and adequate." — Academy. XXXII. HALLUCINATIONS AND ILLUSIONS : A Study of the Fallacies of Perception. By Edmund Parish. "This remarkable little volume." — Daily News. XXXIII. THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY. By E. W. Scripture, Ph.D. (Leipzig). With 124 Illustrations. XXXIV. SLEEP : Its Physiology, Pathology, Hygiene, and Psychology. By Marie de Manaceine (St. Petersburg). Illustrated. XXXV. THE NATURAL HISTORY OF DIGESTION. By A. Lockhart Gillespie, M.D., F.R.C.P. Ed., F.R.S. Ed. With a large number of Illustrations and Diagrams. " Dr. Gillespie's work is one that has been greatly needed. No com- prehensive collation of this kind exists in recent English Literature." — American Journal of the Medical Sciences. XXXVI. DEGENERACY: Its Causes, Signs, and Results. By Professor Eugene S. Talbot, M.D., Chicago. With Illustrations. "The author is bold, original, and suggestive, and his work is a con- tribution of real and indeed great value, more so on the whole than anything that has yet appeared in this country." — American Journal of Psychology. XXXVII. THE RACES OF MAN: A Sketch of Ethno- graphy and Anthropology. By J. Deniker. With 178 Illustrations. "Dr. Deniker has achieved a success which is well-nigh phenomenal."— British Medical Journal. XXXVIII. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION. An Empirical Study of the Growth of Religious Con- sciousness. By Edwin Diller Starbuck Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Education, Leland Stanford Junior University. "No one interested in the study of religious life and experience can afford to neglect this volume." — Morning Herald. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. XXXIX. THE CHILD : A Study in the Evolution of Man. By Dr. Alexander Francis Chamberlain, M.A., Ph.D., Lecturer on Anthropology in Clark University, Worcester (Mass.). With Illustrations. "The work contains much curious information, and should be studied by those who have to do with children." — Sheffield Daily Telegraph. XL. THE MEDITERRANEAN RACE. By Professor Sergi. With over ioo Illustrations. " M. Sergi has given us a lucid and complete exposition of his views on a subject of supreme interest." — Irish Times. XLI. THE STUDY OF RELIGION. By Morris Jastrow, Jun., Ph.D., Professor in the University of Pennsylvania. "This work presents a careful survey of the subject, and forms an admirable introduction to any particular branch of it." — MethoJist Times. XLII. HISTORY OF GEOLOGY AND PALAEONTOLOGY TO THE END OF THE NINETEENTH CEN'l URY. By Karl von Zittel. " It is a very masterly treatise, written with a wide grasp of recent discoveries. " — Publishers' Circular. XLIII. THE MAKING OF CITIZENS : A Study in Com- parative Education. By R. E. Hughes, M.A. (Oxon.), B.Sc. (Lond.). " Mr. Hughes gives a lucid account of the exact position of Education in England, Germany, France, and the United States. The statistics present a clear and attractive picture of the manner in which one of the greatest questions now at issue is being solved both at home and abroad." — Standard. XLIV. MORALS: A Treatise on the Psycho-Sociological Bases of Ethics. By Professor G. L. Duprat. Trans- lated by W. J. Greenstreet, M.A., F.R.A.S. " The present work is representative of the modern departure in the treatment of the theory of morals. The author brings a wide knowledge to bear on his subject." — Education. XLV. A STUDY OF RECENT EARTHQUAKES. By Charles Davison, D.Sc, F.G.S. With Illustrations. " Dr. Davison has done his work well." — Westminster Gazette. [Several New Volumes in the Press.] New York: Charles Scribser's Sons. IBSEN'S DRAMAS. Edited by WILLIAM ARCHER, Dramatic Critic of The World. THREE PLAYS TO THE VOLUME. i2mo, CLOTH, PRICE $1.25 PER VOLUME. " We seem at last to he shown men and women as they are ; and at first it is more than we can endure. . . . All Ibsen's characters speak and act as if they were hypnotised, and under their creator's imperious demand to reveal themselves. There never was such a mirror held up to nature before : it is too terrible. . . . Yet we must return to Ibsen, with his remorseless surgery, his remorseless electric-light, until we, too, have grown strong and learned to face the naked— if necessary, the flayed and bleeding— reality."— Speaker (London). Vol. I. "A DOLL'S HOUSE," "THE LEAGUE OF YOUTH," and "THE PILLARS OF SOCIETY." With Portrait of the Author, and Biographical Introduction by WilliamArcher. Vol. II. "GHOSTS," "AN ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE," and "THE WILD DUCK." With an Introductory Note. Vol. III. "LADY 1NGER OF OSTRAT," "THE VIKINGS AT HELGELAND," "THE PRETENDERS." With an Introductory Note. Vol. IV. "EMPEROR AND GALILEAN." With an Introductory Note by WILLIAM ARCHER. Vol. V. "ROSMERSHOLM," "THE LADY FROM THE SEA," "HEDDA GABLER." Translated by William ARCHER. With an Introductory Note. Vol. VI. "PEER GYNT: A DRAMATIC POEM." Authorised Translation by William and Charles Archer. The sequence of the plays in each volume is chronological j the complete set of volumes comprising the dramas thus presents them in chronological order. "The art of prose translation does not perhaps enjoy a very high literary sratus in England, but we have no hesitation in numbering the present version of Ibsen, so far as it has gone (Vols. I. and II.), among the very best achievements, in that kind, of our generation." — Academy. " We have seldom, if ever, met with a translation so absolutely Idiomatic. " — Glasgow Herald. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons.