PR Knz r, . / Ify _j a CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 3 1924 086 054 800 DATE DUE ^Joi^^^w GAYLORD PRINTED IN us A. Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924086054800 In compliance with current copyrigiit law, Cornell University Library produced this replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Standard Z39.48-1992 to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. 1999 (ilotncU Hmoetsiitg ffiihtatg atljara, Nem ^Jorb FROM THE BENNO LOEWY LIBRARY COLLECTED. BY BENNO LOEWY 1854-1919 BEQUEATHED TO CORNELL UNIVERSITY LECTURES ON DRAMATIC LITERATURE BY JAMES SHERIDAN KNOWLES (Never before published) MACBETH " Shepliera. But what's this I was gaun to say ? ou, ay ! — heard ye ever Knowles's lectures on dramatic poetry ? " North. I have ; they are admirable, full of matter, elegantly written and eloquently delivered. Knowles is a delightful fellow and a man of true genius." Nodes Ambrosiana. FRANCIS HARVEY 4 ST. JAMES'S STREET LONDON 1875 0). CHISWICK press:— PRINTED BY WHITTINGHAM AND WILKINS, TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE, ■ HE Lectures upon Dramatic Literature hy James Sheridan Knowles, delivered more than forty years ago, have never been published. A few presentation copies have lately been printed from the original MB. found in memorandum-books. The lectures are very fragmentary and piecemeal, shipping from booh to booh. Sometimes one booh, serving also as a diary or pochet- tablet, contains portions of two or three different lectures, with only the subject matter to distinguish them. Mr. Sydney Wells Abbott, of the British Museum, has deciphered them and made a sequence of their contents. The memorandum-boohs are nom carefully preserved in morocco cases. From these Lectures the following pages have been selected for publication at this time, when the production of Macbeth at the Lyceum Theatre is the theme of general interest in artistic and literary circles. London, November, 1876. MACBETH PART THE FIRST. exemplify those features in the acting dramatic poem, which contribute mainly to its success, we shall have recourse to Shakespeare; from among those incom- parable records which he has left us of his genius, we shall select the tragedy of " Macbeth," as one of the most felicitous in plot and execution. Of this play we shall examine the first act. In the tragedy of " Macbeth," the historical and the romantic are blended with singular effect. The materials with which history has furnished Shakespeare, are ex- tremely few : the success of Macbeth against the Norwegians, his murder of Duncan at the instigation of Lady. Macbeth, his usurpation of the throne, and his B 2 MACBETH. death by the hand of Macduff. Of these four incidents, which are however sufficiently favourable to unity and climax of action, consists the groundwork of this play. These are the only Unks of his plot for which Shake- speare is indebted to history, all the rest are his own. With those Unks to guide him, he could doubtless have constructed a sufficiently interesting chain of natural situations and events; but the opportunity, which the remote period of the history presented him with, of indulging in the marvellous and supernatural, was too tempting to an imagination like his, not to be profited by. Accordingly, the powers of the air, the mysterious, im- palpable ministers that wait on nature's mischief, were summoned to his aid, and in all the potency of prophecy, illusion and charm, appeared at the invocation of the enchanter. The great aim of the dramatist, so far as the success of the acting dramatic poem is concerned, should be to excite expectation, and to keep it 'up throughout. To effect the latter, every new stage of his action should present some new object of interest. His subject should be proposed as soon as possible, and from that moment he should never allow his plot to stand stiU. I have witnessed plays so wretchedly deficient in this respect, that a whole act has passed, without the audience having any idea what the author was about. How different is Shakespeare's management in this admirable play. Scarcely MA CBETR. 3 has the curtain risen when the story begins to unfold itself: " Ist Witch. Wlien shall we three meet again, In thunder, lightning, or in rain ? 2nd Witch. Wlien the hurly hurly's done, 'ViTien the battle's lost and won. 3rcl Witch. That will be ere set of sun. 1st Witch. Where the place ? 2nd Witch. Upon the heath. 8rd Witch. There to meet with Macbeth. 1st Witch. I come, Graymalkin. 2nd Witch. Paddock calls. 3rd Witch. Anon. All. Pair is foul, and foul is fair : Hover through the fog and filthy air." Here is the hand of the incomparable master. Here, by a scene composed of about half-a-dozen lines, is our interest already strongly excited. There is not in the whole course of the drama beside, ancient or modern, an in- stance where so much is effected in so narrow a compass. We are at once upon the tiptoe of definite expectation. We exclaim to ourselves — " There's matter here ! " Such personages do not busy themselves about nothing, nor can he have a common part to act who is the theme of their conversation, the subject of their solicitude. This impression is improved in the second scene, in which we are partly enlightened as to the character of Macbeth, by the Sergeant and by Macduff, who suc- cessively describe his prowess to the King, and whose relation tends powerfully to exalt our opinion of the 4 MA CBETH. importance of the hero, and to increase our anxiety to see him. The third scene opens — and opens as it ought — with the witches, the purport of whose approaching interview with Macbeth is clearly inferred from the dialogue which precedes his entrance, and which thoroughly develops the evil quality of the beings that have come to give him meeting. I must here, however, protest against the grotesque effect which is generally given to these members of the dramatis personce. It is equally a violation of historical and poetical truth. What can be more preposterous, than to represent an object of terror, in such a manner as to produce something like a laugh at its appearance? How the stage-director can fall into such an error, with the thunder and lightning themselves to admonish him, is inexplicable. The cir- cumstances under which the witches appear, the work they have in hand, the very description of their persons by Banquo, suggest anything rather than a low-comedy iot