■71 ^ President White Library Cornell Univer^ty* - DATE DUE Iftterti iro r rtX) ;^ imi -^imwknmi •^ii-.^>mML::jiim i»±M^ ms^ CAYLORO PniNTCDIN U S.A PR2823.B6T"""'"""'"-'""^ A great soul in conflict: 3 1924 013 f4o-524"' The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924013140524 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT A CRITICAL STUDY OF SHAKESPEARE'S MASTER-WORK BY SIMON A. BLACKMORB, S. J. PKOFESSOK OF ENGLISH LITEEATUKE IN CAJIPION COLLEQB "Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars. But in ourselves." SCOTT, FORBSMAN AND COMPANY CHICAGO NEW YORK ^^ /^."SIa £ 8 ^^ Copyright 1914 BY SCOTT, FORESMAN AND COMPANY PEEFACE No treatise is required to show forth Shakespeare's greatness; it was never questioned. The estimate of his contemporaries is disclosed in the inscription on the mon- ument which they erected in the church at Stratford-on- Avon shortly after his death. In that epitaph he is hailed as unsurpassed by the grand luminaries of antiquity; a Nestor in wisdom, a Socrates in genius, and a Virgil in literary art, he so excels all other contemporary writers that they seem his pages or menials. With the ascendency of Puritanism and its spirit of hostility to the stage, his literary fame began to suffer an eclipse, which continued to deepen down to the days of Dryden, who, the first of modern critics to appreciate his greatness, summarized it in the lofty eulogy: "Shakespeare was the man who of all modern and ancient poets had the largest and the most comprehensive soul." In the century following, when reigned the influence of Pope and Johnson, his excellence became gradually apparent to all English critics, and with Garrick his Plays once more took the stage ; but the century after brought the great revival, and when Coleridge and Hazlitt appeared to expound him, then for the first time the clouds were rifted, and he shone forth a fixed star of the first magnitude with a splendor unequalled in our literary heavens. As a dramatist he is recognized without a peer, and as a poet, but one or two have attained sufficient fame to reach with him the same Parnassian heights. His knowledge of human nature, depth of feeling, richness of fancy, abundance of humor, strength and felicity of expression, and soundness of judgment, are all elements in the greatness of his genius. His masterpieces, the tragedies, remain the never ceasing topic of inspiration; but commentaries, as experience shows, 3 4 PREFACE oftentimes offer difficulties to Catholic readers who cannot fail to notice that they not infrequently misinterpret certain points, pass over others that need elucidation, ignore in common the Poet's Faith and its influence upon his works, and scarcely consider the religion and moral aspect of his dramas. Attracted by his fame, as by a magnet, even the Agnostic, the Pantheist, the Positivist, and the Materialist, have culled out a line here and there from his writings, and, by giving them artful interpretations, have fondly claimed him for their own. Though it be mooted still whether Shakespeare adhered to the Faith of his fathers, or abandoned it to embrace the new State religion, there is no doubt of his Christian belief. But a man's religious principles influence his life, and views, and sentiments, and, therefore, they must surely be weighed, when estimating his character and interpreting his works. A man writes as he is, a Turk as a Turk, a Jew as a Jew, and a Christian as a Christian. He writes, not as an abstraction, but as a complex being of a living soul and body, and all that this implies: a mind swayed by truth or error, a will inclined to virtue or to vice, a heart pulsating in a body alive with human emotions, energies, conflicting passions, sympathies and antipathies, and subject to envi- ronments and to the social, religious, and political conditions of his times; and, therefore, though Shakespeare carefully avoided the obtrusion of his own personality upon his audience, he could not altogether frustrate the revelation of his mind and heart in his dramatic creations. Effects may be traced to their causes. As a statue is but the visible, concrete form of the sculptor 's ideal creation, and reveals the original image or exemplar as existing in the mind of the artist with all its distinctive traits and qualities : so, in like manner, Shakespeare 's characters, as they pass in view before us, are but the objective embodiments of his own subjective, or mental creations with all their distinctive hues and colors. Hence, Brutus personifies patriotism; Coriolanus, pride; lago, villany; Hamlet, honor; Queen Katharine, patience; Cleopatra, sensuality; Edgar, justice; Henry V., true king- PREFACE 5 ship; Edmund, treachery; and Goneril, ingratitude. Every character, either good or evil, discloses the Poet's own esti- mate of vice and virtue. His caricatures of parsons show his dislike of the new State religion, and his "reverent" portraits of monks and nuns in those days of Elizabethan persecution, reveal his deep-rooted love for the olden Faith. Shakespeare's characters then, as the creatures of his mind, must to a greater or less degree mirror the views and sentiments of their creative artist, and, as a consequence, be his own best interpreters. The tragedy of Macbeth has ever been regarded with distinctive preference. Beyond Shakespeare's other plays it has won popular favor even among races other than the Anglo-Saxon. This popularity may' be ascribed to its manifest resemblance to classic tragedy, to its unity of design and simplicity of development, to its pictorial charm, and to its mysterious elements of the preternatural. Hamlet may surpass other plays of Shakespeare in philosophic insight; Othello in careful portrayal of characters; Lear in the power of contending passions; and Cymbeline in the importance of the moral principles involved; but in the transparency of its plan, in the simple force of the harmonious, magnetic current of its action, and in its nervous power, bold sweep, and splendor of poetic diction, Macbeth, says Gervinus, remains uniquely pre-eminent. Its elements are combined with so little art, and yet to such a powerful effect as to give us a drama unequalled in the poetry of any age.^ Some readers may prefer Othello, others Lear; but the majority, according to Hallam, agree that in Macbeth we possess a great epic drama and, in fact, affirms Sir Francis Drake, the grandest effort of Shakespeare's genius, the most sublime and impressive tragedy that the world has ever seen. In the following study of the tragedy the author has devoted his attention mainly to aesthetic criticism, to the analysis of dramatic motives, to the clear exposition of the characters, and especially to the nature and action of the pre- ternatural agents who in fiendish purpose have determined 1. Cf. Commentaries, p/ 583. 6 PREFACE upon the moral ruin of Macbeth. In the process it seemed expedient to notice, not only the historic times in which the drama is cast, but also the social and religious conditions of the Poet's day, together with his views and sentiments, his friendships and antipathies, with the hope of catching here and there a glimpse of the great artist behind the mask of his characters. How far the work may seem successful is left to the judgment of the reader. Though authorities, when quoted, are mentioned as far as possible, the writer wishes to acknowledge obligations to Shakespearean scholars who have brought together a fund of information open to the world, and in particular to Dr. H. Hudson, Mr. E. K. Chambers, Mr. R. G. Moulton, Mr. H. "W. Mabie, and Dr. H. H. Purness. The text is based on that of the Globe Edition, and The Variorum Shakespeare. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTEODUCTION CHAPTER I PAGE Macbeth of History and of Legend — High Steward of Moray. Pays homage to King Cnute. Ancestry. Alliance with Thorfinn. Prosperous reign. Popular monarch. St. Berchan. Falls at Lanfanan. The Macbeth of legend. Character and rapid downfall fictitious. Rebellion of Dunwald and fate of Lady Macbeth a myth. Banquo and Fleance unreal. Macbeth not a historic play. Conflicting facts and fables ; 19 CHAPTER II Dramatic Structure — Laws of art. Romance and the drama. Grecian drama. Triple unities. Influence of Renaissance. Sir Philip Sydney. Schlegel. Unappreciated in France. Voltaire's evil influence. Recognized in Germany. Heine's tribute. Most popular in modern France; causes. Not blind to unities. His idea of plot. The drama's surprising unity. Three parallelisms 22 CHAPTER III t''^ The Preternatural Element — Essential to the tragedy. Influence of the preternatural. Superstition an outward expression of re- ligious truth. Origin and causes. Its persistent foe. New life at invasion of barbarians and at the "Reformation." Witchcraft in the reign of Elizabeth. James I and Demonology. Epidemic spreads to America. When Necromancy flourishes. Evil influence of materialism 27 CHAPTER IV The Weird Sisters — Shakespeare's belief in witches. Reality of ^'^ witchcraft questioned. Adopted popular belief. Weird Sisters not the common witches of superstition. Visible forms of tempt- 7 8 CONTENTS PAGE ing demons. Differentiated from the common witch of supersti- tion. Eea], and not creations of Macbeth 's over-heated mind. Liturgy the visible expression of inward religious faith. Ke- ligion essential to social life. Liturgy necessary to evil tempters. Their diabolical ritual in harmony with their nature. Accom- modated to senses and minds of men. Its employment with Macbeth 31 CHAPTEE V Eeal Nature of the Weikd Sisters — Caution. Credulity. Danger of illusion. Frauds in every age. Church warns her ministers. A contrary extreme. Error of Materialists. Their dogmatisms refuted. Conclusions of Society of Psychical Eesearch. Divine grace and Satanic temptation. Shakespeare scientifically correct. Dr. Taust. ' ' Vestal Virgins of Hell. ' ' Accepts Christian teach- ing regarding demons and diableries. Scriptural facts 35 CHAPTER VI Prophecies of the Weird Sisters — Prediction accurately fulfilled. Their intellectual powers compared with man's. Superior by nature and means of knowledge. Limitations in regard to prophecy. Future events knowable in themselves or in their causes. Causes necessary, contingent, and free. Conjectures. Long experience. Clear insight into workings of human mind and heart. Perverse of nature. Prone to falsehood. Their prophecies not real but apparent 43 CHAPTEE VII Temptation op Man by Evil Spirits — The common lot of all. Shakespeare's belief in good and bad angels. The latter 's special function. God's trial of man differs from that of Satan. Two extremes. Eejection of demoniacal temptation. Refuta- tion. Scriptural teaching and examples. Early Fathers. Why temptation is permitted. Interior and exterior temptation. Modern Spiritism and Necromancy of pagan times. Its evils. Experience of Dr. Potter, Lombroso, Prof. James of Harvard. Another extreme imputes all sin to Satan and his legions. Refutation 47 CONTENTS CHAPTER VIII PAGE Temptation op Macbeth — Qrigin of crim inal purpos e. Critical error. Eef utation. Evil spirits labor to discover man 's interior disposition. Ignatian principle. How they knew Macbeth 's ruling passion. His secret sympathy with them. Another Igna- tian principle. How to distinguish action of good and evil spirits. Macbeth 's full knowledge. Deceived by apparent prophe- cies. Horror at criminal suggestions. Progress of temptation. Barters his eternal jewel. The moral history of every man. Exemption from temptation. Influence of evil spirits measured by man 's own character. Macbeth 's atfinity with evil. Man the master of his fate 56 CHAPTEE IX The CiBractek of Macbeth — Macbeth and Richard III. compared. ' ' JBworthy gentleman. ' ' Inconsistencies of character. His youth. A dreamer, yet a man of action. Qualities of mind, imagination. Intense selfishness. Moral cowardice. Physical courage chief characteristic. The will the basis of morality. Weak in religious principles. Contrasted with Banquo. Neurotic physiologists and Christian moralists. Moral insanity. Ele- ments of a moral act. Responsibility of Macbeth. Not a callous criminal. Latent sense of religion awakened by tor- turing guilt. No real love of religion and virtue. The critical test. Characterization on modern stage not sufficiently differ- entiated from that of Richard III. Secret of sustained interest 62 CHAPTER X Character of Lady Macbeth — Admirable contrast. Appearance described. A twofold interpretation. Etponents. Agreements and exceptions. A new interpretation. The key-note of hei character. Master-passion. Courage. Unconquerable will. Discipline of mental faculties. Splendid imagination. Enthu- siasm and blindness to consequences. The sin of the apostate angel. Moral nature. Lady Martin in extenuation. Refuta- tion. Barren of religion. Practical unbelief. Fatalism. What religion would have done in the formation of her char- acter. Crime awakens her moral nature. Crime and suscepti- 10 CONTENTS PAOK bility to moral emotions. Contrast before and after the crime. Remorse without repentance. A master-trait of the Poet's skiU 74 OHAPTEK XI Moral Significance of the Tragedy — ^Art and morality. The drama teaches by illustration. Web of life a mingled yarn of good and ill. Shakespeare upholds the laws of moral and divine truths. Cardinal Newman. Moral obligation of taming the passions. A modern error. Free from the folly of recent dramatists. Believed in Aristotle's dictum. Effects of his tragedies. Influence of Mystery Plays. Origin and purpose. Their elements of power retained and perfected. His the . Christian perception of man 's purpose in life. Trage ffy a con- flict between man's individual will and the eternal law.TA|fhe reaction. Macbeth one of the highest works of .art. SoKanu truth impressed. St. Edward. Victory ever with the virtuous. Striking parallels between Macbeth and a certain MystCTy I — Play. In all his tr gp;orlifg g Tn^jfitor- pasainn t ^c nno pgnf-Ti'' f^^^^f Transformation of Macbeth presents a psychological and dra- matic interest. The ethical element of unequalled power. Uni- versal application. Excellence as a moralist. Foreign com- mentators 88 ACT FIKST Scene First — The moral gloom of the drama foreboded. Nature of the preternatural agents. In afiinity with tempestsr-* Eepul- sive, unearthly. Diabolical hopes, delirious joy \ 98 Scene Second — Introduction to the king. Macdonwald's; treason. New thane of Cawdor. The camp at Forres. News of battle. The hero of a double victory. Duncan in contrast with Mac- beth. A thought suggested 98 Scene Third — In ambush. The heath described. The Weird Sisters of modern stage incongruous with the Poet's design. Conflicting thoughts. A relationship with malignant spirits. The form of the Weird Sisters. Prophecies. Oracles of old. Their greater and less influence. Have discovered his secret thoughts and passion. Ignatian principle. Their conjecture. CONTENTS 11 PAGE Incredulity and scepticism. The royal commission. "Can the devil speak true?" The two seeming prophecies. Macbeth deceived. His good angel. Cause of Banquo 's incredulity. A Ignatian principles. Lost in reverie. Horrid suggestions. Ross and Angus. Banquo 's deceitful words.) His secrecy according to an Ignatian principle. The lie of ambition 99 Scene Fourth — Duncan in more favorable light. Contrast with Macbeth. Parallel between thane of Cawdor and Earl of Essex. A popular idol and friend of Shakespeare. Tragic irony. Duncan's sense of gratitude and his host's hypocrisy. A new creation. Extravagant expectations. Sense of wrong. Oppor- tune moment for renewed temptation. Crossing the Eubieon. A contrast. A parallel 110 Scene Fifth — A new ally of evil spirits. The subject of conjugal discussion. Union of purpose. Lady Macbeth 's resolve. Mis- takes her husband's character. An unexpected opportunity. A bird of evil omen. An erroneous notion refuted. The con- sequence of her affinity with evil spirits. Cause of her triple cry to demons. Prayer answered. Transformation. Demoniac frenzy. "The dunnest smoke of hell." Her welcome to Macbeth. An error exposed. Exultation. Loves not less the man, but his glory more. A type. Enthusiasm not shared by Macbeth. Encouragement and caution. Inspired by diabolical courage. An example 115 Scene Sixth^ — The king before Macbeth 's castle. Peaceful scene. Poetic discourse. An apology. Royal courtesies. Strained and simulated welcome. A promise. Macbeth 's absence. Play- ful mood. Entering the murderous den. Instinctive feelings of chagrin. Banquo 's indifference. Reasons for suspicions 122 Scene Seventh — ^Absence from banquet. Wrestles with fell pur- pose. Selfish fears. No quahn of conscience. Fatal issues. Keynote to soliloquy. Practical man. Reasons against murder. Vacillation. The tempters summon his evil genius. Attacked in weakest part. A last stand. Change in plans. His oath. Lady Macbeth 's a priori argument. Frenzied and obsessed. An error exposed. A common sophistry. His defense beaten down. Grasps the scheme. Fears removed. Tempters nearing their triumph ^^^ 12 CONTENTS ACT SECOND PAGE Scene Fikst — Banquet-Hall deserted. The court-yard. Troubled dreams. Prayer against temptation. A contrast in relation to evil spirits. Meeting in the court-yard. Surprise. Sounding each other. The tenor of Banquo's dreams.\ Nature of the temptation. His silence furthers the thane 's ambition*; Igna- tian principle. A diabolical spectacle. Its purpose. Follows its guidance. The dagger real or imaginary? Materialistic influence on modern stage. The practice in the Poet's day. Dilation of spirits. Poetic imagery. Time opportune for spirits of evil. Hecate. The clock-tower. Back to the world of action 132 Scene Second — Hopes and fears. Lady Macbeth 's stimulated courage. Her womanly nature. Excited whisperings. An artistic touch. Macbeth rushes in a changed man. His run- away intellect and riotous imagination. Fear and horror. No true remorse. Spellbound by menacing voices. Vivid word- painting. Lady Macbeth bewildered at tempest of his mind. A fatal error. Her contempt and anger. Plot saved from failure. Echoes of his voice of conscience. Courage lost. Frenzied horror. Taunts of cowardice. Continued knockings. Hurried away in shuddering fear. His conscience before and after the murder. In the power of evil spirits. Terrifying images. An agonizing wish 139 Scene Third — An episode. Interpolation admitted. Middleton. Catering to intolerant spirit of the times. Equivocation favorite theme of preachers. Dissimulation of Catholics under Eliza- bethan persecution. Dr. Lingard; Father Parsons. War- burton's hatred of Church, of Jesuits; causes. His calumny refuted. Mental reservation; two kinds. Exposition. Malone's error concerning Father Garnet; refutation. His connection with the Gunpowder Plot; trial and defence of sacramental secrets. The real equivocator. Episode full of irony. Macbeth a type. His castle a moral hell with a devU-porter at its gate. The great discovery. Confusion of metaphors; error not Shakespeare's. Lady Macbeth 's exclusion on modem stage. Mars tragic effect. Eeasons for presence. Macbeth 's con- summate art. Mental crisis. Suspicions roused. Fainting real? Cause. A suggestion. A menace to Macbeth. A fortunate incident I45 CONTENTS 13 PAGE Scene Fourth — Its nature. Threefold purpose. Strange circum- stances. Different types of noblemen. Ironical conversation. Audience learns of events in outer world. The city Scone. The coronation stone. A contrast in characters. Duncan at Cohnekill. lona of the Western Isles. Its fame. St. Columba. Its monasteries destroyed by Eeformers. Three rovs of tombs. Macbeth hastens to Scone 164 ACT THIED Scene First — Banquo in soliloquy.. Secret thoughts and expecta- tions. His moral change. A royal reception. Casts his lot with the usurper's. His hopes. Loyalty suspected. Court dismissed. Macbeth in soliloquy. Mental torment. Over- awed, rebuked. Genius: subjective and objective sense. Bor- rowed from Scripture. Torture of jealousy. Rebels against Fate. The folly of Aman. Conference with the murderers. A cunning play. The plot. Allusion to Banquo 's honesty . ^ . . 168 Scene Second — Lady Macbeth 's settled melancholy. Changed posi- tion. Amid gayety immersed in misery. Eemorse. Conceals sufferings. Severance of their lives. A new trait of character. EalUes her husband. Fatalistic ' tendency. Mistakes the nature of his sufferings. His egotism. Envies Duncan. Materialists. Conceals murderous plot. Queen's hollow cheerfulness. Words often misunderstood. His boast. Rises in exaltation on the wings of poesy 175 Scene Third — Its purpose. Identity of third murderer. The f all V of Banquo. Strong in moral character. Slowly weakens; A victim to the wiles of evil spirits. Linked his fate with the usurper's. Faith in the oracles and hopes. Silence and inac- tivity. Implicitly enjoined by Weird Sisters. Their common method; Ignatian principle. Failure in the crisis. Exposition. Connivance. Recognizes the de facto king. The indissoluble tie. Hopes to profit by the crime. Slowly enmeshed in the snare. A victim to the wiles of evil spirits and hypocrisy of the tyrant 180 Scene Fourth — The banquet. Mysterious visitor. Joyous tidings blighted. Banquo 's ghost. Real, not imaginary. Sense of the preternatural in the Poet's day. Materialism in 18th century. 14 CONTENTS PAGE Ambitious tragedians. No rational motives for innovation. Dramatic need of the ghost. Shakespeare's own direction. First sight of bloody spectre; horror, terror. Assembly in disorder. Efforts of wife ineffectual. Changed tactics. Incrim- inations. Awakened to danger, allays suspicions. Mock mirth. Hypocritical wish. Ghost reappears. A theory rejected. Mac- beth quails. Fear and horror. Wife's anxiety. Kenewed efforts. Strange infirmity. Frenzied challenge. Courtiers deem it Duncan's ghost. Suspicions. Puzzled and amazed. Addresses guests. Horrid sights. Panic-stricken, she hurries the guests away. Alone, a pathetic pair. The wife dispirited; he roused to resolute action. One solace. Main purpose of his tempters. New dangers and difficulties. Accepts sugges- tion of evil spirits. Psychological moralists. Method of tempt- ing sinners. A remarkable example. Exposition 184 Scene Fifth — An interpolation. An inferior artist. The melo- dramatic taste of his times. Keasons against genuineness. Criticism of Hecate's fault-finding unfounded. In accord with the Weird Sisters. Opening of scene. Objection to trading with Macbeth. Eefutation. A widely-known example. Belief of Shakespeare's audience in temptation by evil spirits. Scrip- tural example. Three common temptations. Their trade and traffic with Macbeth. How they knew of his intended visit to the Pit of Acheron. Action opposed to that of good angels; Ignatian principle. Fears and purpose. Prophecies. Boast- ful reliance 198 Scene Sixth — Usually omitted on modern stage. Important pur- pose. The Greek Chorus. Needed information. Dialogue of Koss and Angus. Macduff at the English Court. Macbeth prepares for war. The Poet's frequent mention of prayer. St. Edward. The help of angels and of God ; 203 ACT FOURTH Scene First — ^Witches of this scene not identical with Weird Sisters. Sorcerers of popular belief suffice for action of drama. Their difference in nature, form, and characteristics. Exposition. Witches of present scene in perfect contrast. Exposition. Why a further portrayal of diableries was a compliment to King James. Pictures magic rites common to sorcerers in league with CONTENTS 15 PAGE Satan. The' touch of a master-artist, ramiliars of witches. Dr. Johnson on their fiendish incantations. The supreme crisis. Trusted guides. By sorcery communicates with spirits that ' ' know all mortal consequences. ' ' Course parallel with King Saul's. Piarpose of his evil tempters. The spectre of the armed head. Apparition of the bloody child. The promise. Third apparition. The demon's oracular prediction. Tearless courage. Demoniacal methods of temptation. Sacred Scripture. Ignatius Loyola in Cavern of Manresa exhibits contrasts and resem- blances to Macbeth in cave of Acheron. High ambition. Expo- sition. Penned rules to distinguish good from bad spirits. Two pertinent to present scene. Two wiles commonly exemplified in Spiritism. Society of Psychical Research in confirmation of Ignatian principles. Macbeth obsessed like Saul. Jealousy concerning "Banquo's issue. 'J Eight spectral kings; their meaning. Compliment to King James. Effect of diabolical show upon Macbeth. Remorse and anguish. Mockery of the witches. Anger and imprecations. Macduff's flight. A bloody resolution 206 Scene Second — Usually omitted. Doubtful propriety. In part, a pleasing episode. Domestic life. Opposing forces. Lady Macduff's irritation. Ross' attempt to allay her fears and anxieties. Leighton's animadversions. Refutation. The Poet guards Macduff against aspersion. Dialogue of mother and witty child. Stage children of Shakespeare. Not incongruous to his audience. Choir-boys in competition with adult actors. The child's knowledge of Scripture. Messenger's warning. His identity. Reasons for flight questioned. The murderers. Valor of child. Dying words. Lady Macduff overtaken in flight Scene Third — Fugitives at English court. Strong dramatic effect. Vivid picture of rightful heir. Macduff's patriotism. Loyalty suspected. Ruse to test the thane. The seven capital sins. The twelve king-becoming virtues. The Prince's Christian parents. Deviation from Holinshed. A parallelism. Despairs of Scotland. Subterfuge exposed. A virtuous king compared with the usurper. Man's little kingdom. The great royal wheel. A zealous tory. The first among English kings. A delicate compliment. Versed in Catholic teaching. King James' miraculous power? Discredited. "A British Solomon." 225 16 CONTENTS PAGE The angel coin. Dr. Johnson's experience. Another fugitive. Delaying sad tidings. Frequent reference to St. Edward. High praise of Siward. The Poet's idea of Christendom. De civitate Dei. Christian cosmopolitanism. An international court. St. Bernard. King John. Philip of France and divorce. A parallel suggested. An unwarranted assumption. Love for his parents' religion. Revelled in the glories of Catholic England. A stroke at Elizabeth 's ministers. Breaking the sad news. ' ' He has no children. ' ' Eef utation. The thane 's afSietion. Christian sentiments. Frequent use of term Heaven. The army ready. Invocation of Divine Providence 231 ACT FIFTH Scene First — Artistic purpose of scene. Unsurpassed in emotional portrayals. Cause of Lady Macbeth 's sufferings. Physician skeptical. Questionings. "Lo, here she comes." Appearance described. Somnambulistic walking. Three series of phantasms. Damned spot. Hell is murky. Eternal separation from God. Last days of Elizabeth recalled. Supreme remorse. Compunc- tion only natural. King Antiochus. Elements of supernatural sorrow. Strange, her remorse exhibits no true repentance. Ex- position. Under the influence of evil spirits. Their changed tactics. An Ignatian principle. A glimpse of the walking spectre. Physician's conclusions. A physician with divine legatine powers. Shakespeare's belief. Kind-hearted physi- cian. An insinuation. Bewildered. Judgment suspended. . . . 260 Scene Second — Attempt to stay the hand of fate. A conference of nobles. Arrival of English forces. Personal wrongs. Justice of their cause. Familiarity with Sacred Scripture. Secret information. List of English gentry. Distemper of Macbeth. March to Birnam . . . 271 Scene Third — Mad excesses. Confidence alternates with fear. Ani- mates his followers' flagging spirits. Contempt of English forces. Confidence in evil tempters grows with dangers. The sinner's folly when ensnared by wiles of Satan. Exposition. Subjective confidence shaken by objective realities. Fury. External violence a reflex of internal disorder. Complaints strangely piteous. Blindness. Remorse not chief afSictiqg. CONTENTS 17 PAGE WeariBess of life. A probable reference to Elizabeth. Sleep- less nigtts. Anger at physician. Fluctuates between fear and valiant fury. Scene closes with boastful words of credulity 281 Scene Fotirth — Theatres of London in Shakespeare's day. Testi- mony of a literary contemporary. Absence of visible scenery resulted in most exquisite poetry. Representation of war on the stage. Malcolm's command. The moving forest. Legendary. Mythical basis a German custom. King Grunewald. Scottish legend. A council of war 289 Scene Fifth — The camp at Dunsinane. Call to arms. Address. Reflections in soliloquy. Lady Macbeth 's demise; cause. Im- pressive lesson. One of Dramatist's finest thoughts. Affection for wife. Contrary opinion. Refutation. Procrastination of mortal fools. Dusty death. Subjective feelings. Walking shadows. Alarming news. Loss of self-control. Birnam Wood moving forward. Suspects equivocating fiends. Deception his own folly. How evil spirits verified their own predictions. "Pulls in resolution." Distemper of mind. Bewildered and enraged. Defiance of Fate 292 Scene Sixth — ^Macbeth 's castle. Scotch forces. Their numbers revealed. Strategem from military point of view. Leaders of Malcolm 's forces. Holinshed 300 Scene Seventh — Field of battle. Skirmishes and conflicts. Mac- beth in soliloquy. Ensnared. Reflections. Strangeness of continued confidence in evil spirits. An oversight of the Poet? Refutation. Soliloquy interrupted. Young Siward's ambition. The combat. "Thou wast born of woman." Macduff's eager search. Reflections. Malcolm and old Siward. Successes in battle 301 Scene Eighth — Mournful picture of forlorn hope. Description. The dilemma. An evil suggestion. Suicide as viewed by pagans. The Christian view. Grows with the de-Christianization of a country. Its causes. The Poet's view of self-murder. English law. Shakespeare's philosopher. Christian Faith sole barrier. An illustration of Roman fools. Philosophy futile in crisis of life. Macbeth 's motives against suicide. Clash of swords. Dissuades from unequal combat. The hellish charm broken. Wondrous effect. Inconsistencies. Refusal to combat further; 18 CONTENTS PAGE reasons. Macduff's disdain and threats. Scorns proffered terms of surrender. In frenzied rage resorts to sword. The combat and fall. A common practice. Garrick's addition. Question- able improvement. Malcolm and forces enter in triumph. Old Siward disregards condolence. A delicate hint. The soldiers of God and the Saintly Edward. Prayer of the Christian war- rior. Macduff and the tyrant's head. Hail, King of Scotland. Senseless omission of the Prince's closing speech. A last com- pliment to the new sovereign. His aversion for Elizabeth. Shared by Puritans and Catholics. Causes. Hopes of Cath- olics. A parallelism. Malcolm's promises. Christian character. Coronation 304 EPILOGUE A universal type of temptation. Its moral purpose. Comprehended by the master-artist. Its burden the conflict of human passions. Cause of the conflict. The dominant passion. Illustrations. A domestic enemy. The key to a man's character. Shakespeare's tragedies perfect biographies. Spiritual significance. The story of the nations. The great truth emphasized in' the tragedy of Macbeth .S20 Appendix — Text of the Tragedy f 326 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I THE MACBETH OF HISTORY AND OF LEGEND The Macbeth of history differs greatly from the warrior of fable and of legend. He first appears in trustworthy annals as the chieftain and hereditary high steward of Moray, who accompanied Malcolm II. on a journey to England to pay homage to King Cnut. His mother was Doada, daughter of the King ; his father was not Sinel, the thane of Glamis, but Finley, the thane of Ross, who was killed about the year 1020 in an encounter with Malcolm II., the great grandfather of Duncan. Macbeth married the Princess Gruoch, the daughter of Boete. The latter had a joint claim to the throne; but Malcolm himself having no male issue, murdered him in 1032. Macbeth and Gruoch, therefore, had no good will toward the reigning branch of the family, for each had a father's murder to be avenged on the person of Duncan. When Malcolm died in 1034, his grandson, Duncan, the cousin of Macbeth, succeeded him, and at once named his eldest son, prince of Cumberland and heir to the throne. Duncan, however, was not possessed of martial abilities, and his rule in those stormy times proved very ineffectual. After an unsuccessful invasion of England, he was obliged to enter upon a repressive war against Thorfinn, the Nor- wegian Jarl of Norway. But Macbeth, the commander of the Scottish forces, made common cause with Thorfinn, and his emissaries having murdered Duncan, he of his own right and of his wife's, assumed the crown. The one point upon which historians agree is that Macbeth 's reign of seventeen years (1040-1057) was rematkable for unprecedented order and prosperity. Maintaining a vigorous government, he enforced the good and useful laws which he made, a thing wholly neglected by former kings. Hence, for his times, he 19 20 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT was a popular monarch, worthy and beneficent, whose bounty to the Church becoming known in Scotland and beyond her borders, won for him great renown. The title of "liberal king ' ' was given him by St. Berchan. For these reasons and, moreover, because he neither renewed nor acknowledged the fealty which Malcolm had paid to England, the Scotch, who had long felt indignation at foreign mercenaries interfering in their domestic affairs, held him in high esteem, and men of great consequence considered it an honor to bear his name.^ Macbeth 's most formidable enemy was his southern neighbor, the Earl of Northumberland. With the consent of Edward the Confessor, Siward invaded Scotland by land and sea, and in a great battle defeated Macbeth. Malcolm was at once proclaimed king, but the uncrowned monarch, retreating to the North, continued the war for four years until he fell at Lanfanan in Aberdeenshire. This Scottish king of the eleventh century, renowned for beneficence and patriotism, has, under the influence of medieval story-telling and willful falsification of historic facts for political purposes, been transformed into another Macbeth of myth and legend. With Scottish historians who followed the war of independ- ence, says Hume Brown : "It was a prime concern to produce an unbroken line of Scottish kings stretching to the fathers of the human race. As an interloper of this series, they make Macbeth a monster whose origin and actions must alike have been contrary to nature."^ For the material of his tragedy, Shakespeare turns to his favorite book. The Chronicles of England and ScoUgndr-hy Raphael HolinshedTTna trom a mettley of fable andTtradition, which is called The_Mistory of_Macbeth, he drew various elements and freely combined them without regard to historic facts. Holinshed's authority is Hector Boyee of King's Col- lege, Aberdeen, and that of Boyce is John Fordun, a chantry priest of the same city. Fordun, of the fourteenth century, 'i 1. Cf. The New-Hudson, Introduction. ,, ,. 2. History of Scotland, Cambridge Series. MACBETH OF HISTORY AND LEGfBND 21 was the first "to gather floating legends, stories, facts, and fables concerning Scotland, and compact them into some- thing like a chronological system," in a work known as Chronica Gentis Scotorum. Though Boyce follows Fordun, he freely adds new epic and dramatic elements, which clothe the legendary Macbeth with the more familiar form recog- nized in Holinshed and Shakespeare. In obtaining material for his plot, the Poet does not confine himself to the History of Macbeth, but freely borrows incidents from other parts of the Chronicles. Thus around the murder of Duncan he weaves certain facts which are historically connected with the murder of King Duffe, the great grandfather of Lady Macbeth, such as the portents, the tempest, and the drugging of the grooms. Duffe was murdered by Dunwald, the governor of the castle, and his wife. The drama, moreover, widely diverges from the historic Macbeth, not only in the portrayal of his character, but also in the rapidity of his downfall, and in his true connection with the Norwegians, who did not invade Scotland during Duncan's reign. Again, the rebellion of Dunwald is mere fiction, and concerning the fate of Lady Macbeth, fable, tradition, and history are all silent. Banquo and Fleance, whose names are not even Gaelic,, seem fictitious characters. Though they were not the ancestors of the House of Stewart, and were unknown to early authorities, yet modern Peerages and Genealogical Charts still retain their names in the pedigree of the Royal Houses of England and Scotland. As Shakespeare, however, designed Macbeth to be a tragedy an3~iKyt-air-histwitr play," it-mattered little whether his materials ""were based on~lact or fiction. Hence, freely blending together conflicting facts and fables, he has fash- ioned a drama which may rank as his greatest work. As a psychological study of the effects of evil upon human life, it is pitched in the highest tragic key. "Its thoughts, kindled into speech and its purpose into action, crowd and jostle each other in such rapid succession that it has been deservedly described as a tempest set to music."' 1. Furness, Variorum Shakespeare. CHAPTER II DRAMATIC STRUCTURE All art under whatever form is governed by fixed and universally recognized laws. The greater their observance, the greater the perfection of the work. These laws are more imperative in_ the drama than in story or romance. A novel is written for leisurely pei'usal, and whether it be simply a heaping together of many but heterogeneous parts, or contain a well laid plot, the reader may pause at will or even turn back to study its plan. But the drama labors under different conditions. Intended for uninterrupted action, it hurries the spectator from scene to scene, leaving him little time to dwell in imagination upon rapidly succeeding events. In consequence, the plot of the drama must be more transparent, and its links of unity more obvious. In ancient Greece, the cradle land of dramatic literature and art, the laws of the. drama were inexorably observed. Her great masters never deviated from the triple unity of action, time, and place. According to the law of unity of action, they rigorously excluded every extraneous element, and, in developing a single action, clustered around it all the incidents, so as naturally to form one whole. Less essential were the other unities of time and place. They sprang from the conditions of the Grecian stage, which was never deserted during the whole play. The law of unity of time ordained that the action be continuous, and embrace no event which could not be repre- sented in a period of time equivalent to a single day. Unity of place required that the scene be laid in the same place, and continue unchanged throughout the play. Moreover,, the master dramatists of Greece confined their tragedies to the grave, terrible, and pathetic, and excluded all that was 22 -DRAMATIC STRUCTURE 23 comic and too familiar. These characteristics distinguish the classic from the romantic tragedy, which, though they differ much, nevertheless agree in one important point: both are the realm of powerful passions which tend to purify hy means of pity and of terror. Under the influence of the Renaissance, the French dramatists became enamored of classic literature, and in their natural love for regularity, adopted and introduced into modern Europe the triple unity of Greek tragedy. In England, however, where the Renaissance was less influential, the romantic drama grew rapidly in popular favor. Though there were not wanting scholars like Sir Philip Sydney, who in an Apology for Poetry (1583) vigorously defended the classic against the new romantic school, against them was the rising genius of Shakespeare. Independently of Grecian models, of which perhaps he knew little, he was the greatest factor in the creation of the romantic tragedy, which differs from the classic as a wild and magnificent landscape from a beautiful and regularly plotted garden. "The ancient art of dramatic poetry rigorously separates things which are dissimilar. The romantic delights in indissoluble mixtures and contrarieties ; nature and art, poetry and prose, serious- ness and mirth, spirituality and sensuality, terrestrial and celestial, life and death, are by it blended together in the most intimate combination. " ^ If the Shakespearean drama found little favor in France, it was because . her own great dramatists had formed the popular taste for classic tragedy. Hence, Voltaire, whose spirit too long dominated French criticism, failed to appre- ciate Shakespeare's plays. To him, they were wild and incoherent, and the violations of the classic unities made the Poet a barbarian in his eyes. Different was the verdict of the race across the Rhine. Their own great masters, lovers of the romantic drama, recognized the genius of Shakespeare; in fact, as they claim, rediscovered him, brought him forth from the obscurity which began with the Puritan eclipse, and made his plays popular among other nations. Where Voltaire 1. Schlegel, Dramatic Literature, p. 342» 24 A GKEAT SOUL IN CONFLICT saw nothing but wildness and ineoherency, Heine saw the sublimest unity. "The world," he says, "forms the stage of Shakespeare's plays, and that is his unity of place ; eternity is the period in which his plays come to pass, and that is his unity of time ; and the hero of his plays, the bright essential figure, representing the unity of action and comformable to the other two is — Mankind, a hero who is always dying and always rising again, always loving, yet in whom love is stronger than hate. ' ' With the passing of Vo ltaire 's influence came an awak - ening of the Jrj;&nchltQ,tbe_genius of Shakespeare. Of all his plays, Macbeth has won the greatest popularity in France. "No other," affirms Darmesteter, "has supplied our everyday literature with more lifelike characters or more hackneyed _phrases. "Macbeth, Lady Macbeth, Banquo, are for us in France quite as real as any characters of our own national theater; their meaning is as clear and striking, and the banquet of Macbeth, the ghost of Banquo, the 'damned spot' of Lady Macbeth, are become familiar in everyday speech. This especial popularity of Macbeth is due to its rigorous unity, startling clearness, and to its enthralling logic; in this last respect it is the most purely classic of Shakespeare's plays." Though ,deviating.-from- the laws that restricted ancient tragfidy^it must be noted that Shakespeare was far fromblind to the problems of^the classic unities. Neither the difficulties which tbey involve nof'a desire to be unhampered by them induced him to prefer the romantic drama. The unities offered him no difficulties, as he proves in two successive dramas, The Winter's Tale and The Tempest. In the former, he deliberately and wildly violates all the unities, while in the latter, he most scrupulously adheres to them, a fact which discloses his ability, as well as his deliberate choice to accept or to reject at will the formalities of classicism. As a consequence, while his g rasp of bnTnan Tiai^irgja jTrvj^rergally admitted, he is often . charged with being irregulai:^4fr^5is A^t^H--^ wholei ani in particulai^of being careless in the DRAMATIC STRUCTURE 25 construction of his plots. To some this opinion seems super- ficial. Par from being a despiser of law, he has elevated the^ whole conception of plot from that of mere unity of action, obtained by the reduction of the amount of matter presented, to that of a harmony of design, binding together concurrent/ actions from which no degree of complexity was excluded.^ In ancient tragedy, it is true, single action constituted th€ whole idea of plot, but in Shakespeare the dramatic action is of a much more elaborate order, and commonly consists of complex elements, reduced to an agreeable unity. The ancient differs from the modern tragedy as melody from symphony. If simplicity of plot made ancient tragedy a solemn melody, complexity of plot makes Shakespeare's a grand symphony, in which the main action is the master melody with which other inferior yet distinct actions blend in perfect harmony. "Happenings within the space of seventeen years are com-^ pressed into the narrow limits of the drama, in which are represented three successive stages in the life of Macbeth — his crime, his prosperity, and his punishment. What the Greek masters would have developed in a trilogy, as in Orestes, for example, to which Macieth has been more thai/ once compared, is here confined to a single drama. ' ' ^ ' Though complex in character, Macbeth has, neverthe- less, peculiar unity of. structure, its absolute regularity of movement, its counter-balanced parts, and freedom from complicating underplots, indicate that the Poet has by sympathy of genius approached therein, more than in any other of his dramas, to the simplicity and bold sweep of the ancient classics. Clearly the motive of the tragedy was too serious to allow of trifling or delay by digressions or counter- plots, and hence every episode, however slight, even though introduced for the purpose of relief or of contrast, bears a real relation to the prime character. The whole action of the drama, concentrated in the rise and fall of the protagonist, sweeps along with amazing rapidity. His fortunes, flowing 1. Cf. Shakespeare as a Dramatic Artist, R. G. Moulton, C. XX. 2. A. Mezieres, apud Furness. 26 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT on unimpeded, reach the summit of success at the middle of the play, and thence as quickly ebb downward to the close or catastrophe. Its s urprising unity res ults from the devel- opment of j^ jingle c harac ter. Macbeth fills the play; for, present "or 'absent, he never ceases to occupy our attention, Nothing happens that does not bear upon his destiny; when the Scotch nobles discuss the unfortunate condition of their country, Macbeth is the subject of their discourse. When the assassins present themselves at the castle of Macduff, it is Macbeth who has sent them. "When the witches assemble on the heath, it is for the ruin of Macbeth. When Hecate appears among them to hasten their work of crime, it is to lure Macbeth to destruction. He binds in on e all por tions o£_.the drama; for every circumstance contributes toward the denouement, and we can not fail to admire the powerful art with which Shakespeare has maintained unity amid the numberless catastrophes of the play.^ Remarkable, moreover, are thej)arallelisms found in three incidents that lead tohis-triumph, and in the three that drive him on to ruin. Each Act again has a specific purpose; the First, the temptation; the Second, the murder of Duncan; the Third, the murder of Banquo; the Fourth, of Macduff's famijy; and llTe~FlHB7T& catastro;^j£.in which each crime meets a merited reti^ibution. There is, furthermore, a unity of thought that doniinates the whole .drama, a central ideav which, embodied outwardly in the workings of an unholy ambition and in its fatal consequences, is illustrated in the rise and fall of Lord and Lady Macbeth. In them is exposed the all important trutli that ever y mortal is subject to temp- tation, and must carve out his own destiny for good or for evil, according as he dominates or is dominated by his ruling passion. A theme so universal in its application is indeed worthy of Shakespeare's grandest tragedy. 1. Ibidem. CHAPTBE III THE PRETERNATURAL ELEMENT Preternatural agencies are an essential element of the' t rageSy" oi^ Macheth. Visibly embodied in the W eir.fl Sisters, the ^control the traged y from first to last. If the preter- uatural has always exercised a peculiar power over the h uman mind Mt is because, ma n 's nalural^dfisiiB, .taJ£nflwJ±La_£uture prompts him to attempts in every ag e to lif t the veil of futurity. Owing to this impulse, often heightened by a desire of personal gain or advantage, superstitious practices, even though inhibited by divine command, have been widely dif- fused among all peoples, and have persisted through all times. Superstition, like idolatry itself, is but the outward expression of some religious truth, which, inherent in our nature, is coex- tensive with human kind. Wandering away from the cradle lands of the human race, tribe after tribe lost in time the knowledge of the true God and His worship, and fashioned new but idolatrous religions in which Satan, substituting himself for the Creator, received, under varied forms of idols and oracles and superstitious practices, the supreme homage due alone to Almighty God. This fact Milton commemorates in verse : "By falsities and lies the greater part Of mankind they corrupted to forsake God their Creator . . . And devils to adore for deities. Then were they known to men by various names, And various idols through the heathen world. The chief were those who from the pit of Hell Roaming to seek their prey on Earth, durst fix Their seats long after, next the seat of God, Their altars by His altars, gods adored Among the nations round. ' ' (Par. Lost. Bk. 1.) 27 28 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT The worship of false gods was nothing more than the service of the devils. Satan and his fallen angels were the animating spirit of idolatrous religions, and dwelt in their idols, and oftentimes spoke through them. Hence the royal Psalmist affirms, "The gods of the gentiles are devils";* and again, St. Paul, "The things which the heathen sacri- fice, they sacrifice to devils and not to God."^ Idolatry begot superstitious practices, which grew with its growth, and fiourishing through the heathen world, attained most multiplied forms when ancient Greece and Rome had reached the summit of their culture. Divination, sorcery, magic, necromancy, and witchcraft, were all ready instruments by which evil spirits intruded themselves into the affairs of human life. But superstiti on found in_ Christiani ty-an-im^placable foe. With the expansion of the Church all forms of diableries were b aJiished from the light of day , aild no lonaer couM~thfiv ply their noxious trade, save in secret hiding places. Superstition was awakened to new life during the Midd le AgespwhSirthe wild hordes of the JNorth m repeated incursions poured down upon Europe, bringing with them their tribal gods and their sorceries; and again when, centuries later, the spirit of the Renaissancp. PTigen rlprprl by mparig of pa^garTlrCeraturFaHS^rt a widespread_recrudescence of ^pernicious practices. These were much resorted to in Germany and in England in the days of Shakespeare. Belief in evi l spirits and in the power of witchesto_do_ harm b y. ..tli eir aid,_aKas-~jCommon to the sSteentirand~ seventeenth cent ]iries.---JKitcLerA£tJb.ad become so prevalent m Engla nd durin g the reign of Elizabeth that in i562'~a statute was enacted which made it a crime of the .greatest magnitud e." Jame s I., himself a firm believer in the black art, issued in 1599 his famous work "on" Demonology, as a counterblast to the skeptical book of Reginald Scott; and, on ascending the English throne, enacted a penal law which minutely defined the practice of witchcraft: "Any one that shall use, practice or exercise any invocation of any evil or 1. Ps. 95 :5. 2. 1 Cor. 10, 20. THE PEETERNATURAL ELEMENT 29 wicked spirit, or consult or covenant with, entertain or employ any evil or wicked spirit to or for any purpose, or take up any dead man, etc. — such offender duly and lawfully convicted shall suifer death. "^ After this enactment, the witch mania became epidemic in every part of England, and crossing the sea caused great disturbance, notably in Boston and Salem, Massachusetts, where twenty persons were exe- cuted for the supposed crime of witchcraft.^ A most powerful agent in the reaction against the mania was the Jesuit, Frederick Von Spec, a professor at the University of Paderborn. His work, Cautio Criminalis, printed in 1631, won for him a worldwide reputation. It is an arraignment of trial for witchcraft, based on his own experience, and describes in thrilling language and with cutting sarcasm the. horrible abuses of judicial proceedings, and particularly the inhuman use of the rack.^ The later part of the nineteenth century witnessed, especially in England and America, a strange revival of necromancy or spiritism, which claims today far more adherents than is commonly supposed. As, on the testimony of Josephus, sorcery flourished most in Israel during periods of religious decay, so in modern times, it appears that Satan, whose activity was curbed by the light and influence of the gospel of Christ, is reasserting his power and regaining his ascendency in proportion as men, abandoning the one and supernatural religion, practically revert to irreligion, to heathenism, and infidelity. Hence, in co mmunities where the Christian reveal ed religion is weakest, there superstition is often found to thrive the most. The spirir"5f~tlTettgionras 1. King James prided himself upon liis knowledge of demonology. "He demonstrated," says Liugard (Vol. VII, p. 281), "the existence of witches and the mischiefs of witchcraft against the objections of Scott and Wierus ; he even discovered a satisfactory solution for that obscure but interesting question, 'Why the devil did work more with ancient woman than others.' Witchcraft at his solicitation was made a capital offense and from the com- mencement of his reign there scarcely passed a year in which some aged female or other was not condemned to expiate on the gallows her supposed communication with the evil spirit." 2. The era of the Long Parliament was that, perhaps, which numbered the most executions. Three thousand persons are said to have perished dur- ing the continuance of the sittings of that body, by legal executions inde- pendently of summary deaths at the hands of the mob. The last execution for supposed witchcraft occurred as late as 1716. Cf. International Cyclo- pedia, Vol. 15. .3. Cath. Cyclopedia, Vol. XV. 30 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT dominated by Materialism, has exercised an evil influence upon the modern stage, as is seen in the travestied present- ment of the Weird Sisters. They have now become nothing more than common witches who are altogether different from their preternatural reality in Shakespeare 's day. Hence, says Hazlitt :^ "We can conceive a common actor to play Richard III. tolerably well. We can conceive no one to play Macbeth properly, or to look like a man who has encountered the Weird Sisters. All the actors that we have ever seen appear as if they had encountered them on the boards of Drury Lane or Covent Garden, but not on the heath of Forres, and as if they did not believe what they had seen. The Weird Sisters are ridiculous on the modern stage and we doubt if the Furies of Aeschylus would be more respected." I 1. Characters of Shakespeare, p. 23. CHAPTER IV THE WEIRD SISTERS Shakespear e 's belief in witches was that common to his t imes . T o tSie popular mmd/wn. chaal^w.e.reij^^ and willing instrume nts of evil spirits that sought to infl ict injury on m ankind. ^ Jjy tradition they were unch ristian old hags, whose" ugliness no less-than their malevolence inspire d. disgusL mthfir thaj i awe and texror . If they inflicted temporalj injury on the victims of their envy and hate, they were powerless to lead them involuntarily to spiritual ruin. A ccording to popular belief. the ; v entered into a compact wilh ISatan, who appearing in soiiiev^E[e'^Dr^'''|^ormsed the witch what she most desired on the cnuHition that she ab;iure ^Chris tianity and swear fealty to himself. The powers of w itches as well as their rites and incantations were substan- tially the same in Christian as in^agan times. ~~ The reality of witchcraft is a question on which it is not easy to pronounce a confldent judgment. In the face of Holy Scripture and the teaching of the Fathers and theologians the abstract possibility of a pact with the Devil and of a diabolical interference in human affairs can hardly be denied ; but no one can read the literature of the subject without being convinced that in ninety-nine cases out of one hundred the allegations rest upon nothing better than pure delusion. The most bewildering circumstance is the fact that in a large number of witch prosecutions the confessions of the victims, often involving all kinds of Satanistic horrors, have been made spontaneously and apparently without threat or fear of torture. Also the full admission of guilt seems constantly to have been confirmed on the scaffold when the poor sufferer had nothing to gain or lose by the confession. One can only record the fact as a psychological problem, and point out that 31 32 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT the same tendency seems to manifest itself ia other similar. cases.^ Aware of the popular belief in witchcraft, tha. Poet deemeci ""it unnecessary ' to " elaborate^ Macbeth 's relation to Satan, or to picture an open compact betweenhim and the powers of evil; all thiswas clear to the minds of his audience. "b uilding upon this p"pi?1ar bp1ief-_.ihe.^£Qfit gives us . in. the "Weird Sisters, not the wi tches of .c ommop sjjifierstitiojL, but a new c reation u nique and altogether Ji&. own. "Tiiet_are," says jCJoleriHie^ '-'as true a creation of Shakespeare as his ^Ariel and Caliban, and wMre^wEoliy~aiffefmg from witches of other writers, yet present a sufficient external resemblance to the creatures of vulgar superstition to act immediately on the audience." The Greek Hecate and her sister witches of Middleton, as well as of other contemporary dramatists, are, says Charles Lamb, "The plain traditional old women witches of our ancestors — poor, deformed, and ignorant, the terror of villages— themselves amenable to a justice; but he indeed should be a hardy sheriff who with all the power of the county at his back should attempt to lay hands on the "Weird Sisters : They are beyond human jurisdiction. " If in them the Poet designed to give a visible expression to a moral significance in the workings of human guilt, which, beginning with the fall in Eden, has continued under varied modes through all the ages, he was obliged to clothe these tempting evil spirits in some visible form like the "Weird Sisters, who, bearing some resemblance to the traditional witch, would merit credibility and rouse the attention of his audience. Hence, w hile assigning them t he feminine garb of the eomriion witch, he yet differentiates their nature by .maJiing them heavily bearded women, by giving them- the new and distinc- tive name of ""Weird Sisters," and by endowing them in P^-SOii; like the Norse Norns, with unusual preternatural pow- e]a.^jl(LsaperlujmaJiJHa«wded,g£._^^ theirjruthful reality, he scrupulously insists on picturing them in disguise a s^TTStti ve, obj ective exiftencesT'TEis" was the more "necessary , since, dominating the whole action of the drama, they lead 1. Cf. Herlicit Thurston, S. .T., apud The Catholic Cyclopedia. THE WEIRD SISTERS 33 Macbeth on through doubts and conflicts to his final ruin; and, as a consequence, to appreciate the tragedy, the reader must consider them as beings, as real as Macbeth and Banquo. By gliding forth amid lightning flashes like ghosts from a thunder cloud, the "Weird Sisters indicate, at their very first appearance, their diabolical nature and kinship to the dark and tempestuous elements of nature. Two persons behold them at the same time ; both address them, and are in turn addressed by them in prophetic terms. If in our Mate- rialistic age a few critics affect to view them as mere fantastic creations of Macbeth 's overheated mind, and without any objective reality, such a notion is amply refuted by the drama itself, as well as by the historic fact that, on Shakespeare's own stage, the "Weird Sisters appeared and visibly enacted their role with no less objective reality than did the other characters of the play. As real witchcraft is the work of Satan, so are its religion and its liturgy. "We cannot quite dispense in this life," says Professor Dowden, "with ritualism, and the ritualism of evil is foul and ugly." A liturgy is nothing more than an outward and visible expression of inward religious faith and worship, and religion of some kind is shown by the experience of ages to be essential to social life, and if essen- tial to social life on Earth, it is no less so to the society of Hell. Lucifer, who would not serve in Heaven, rules in Hell as Satan or adversary of God, where he receives the gruesome homage of ruined legions. In dealing with his willing tools on Earth, he must perforce adopt means in harmony with his mysterious and preternatural character, and employ, moreover, a ritual, a liturgy by which he may give human expression to his diabolical religion, and such expression must be especially accommodated to the senses and minds of men. Hence, when dealing with Macbeth, evil spirits in the form of the weird use the language and ritual of witchcraft as best suited to their purpose and best understood by hjnu Making a brew of infernal charms, they reveal their ecstasy | over intended crimes, sing in hellish glee, and to mystic rhythms dance around their fiendish chaldron, disclosing in. \( 34 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT their abhorrent rites the passionless malignity of their diabolical natures. Darkness is their light, storms their sun- shine; tumults, terrors, murders, insanity, suicides, and Satanic liturgies their sole religion. CHAPTER V THE REAL NATURE OP THE WEIRD SISTERS Accounts of preternatural occurrences, it is evident, must be received vs^ith caution. Aristotle's dictum, virtue is the golden mean, is serviceable in guarding against credulity as well as incredulity. Both, equally odious, are blemishes of the human mind. Truth is attainable only by avoiding the one and the other. There is always danger of illusion, since the populace whose credulity is proverbial, is naturally inclined to attribute to occult or preternatural forces any wondrous effect the cause of which is non-apparent. No less common is the danger of deceit ; though charlatans have been repeatedly exposed, they continue to ply their trade with astonishing success; though fraudulent spiritists and their sham seances have been unmasked time and again, they still attract the many who are overmastered by the desire to meddle with the preternatural. The frauds prevalent in every age have induced the Church wisely to caution her ministers against deceptions. In her ritual of exorcism, she teaches that extraordinary effects, which are commonly ascribed to the preternatural, are not readily to be admitted ; that there is always danger lest the superstition of the masses and their credulity may enable impostors to parade in the garb of truth; that natural distempers, certain kinds of madness, uncommon palsies, and epilepsies, are not to be construed as effects of enchantments or possessions, nor to be attributed to causes beyond the natural upon vulgar prejudices and notions of the manner in which such things are done. She insists that her ministers meet every apparently preternatural effect with a critical mind, that they judiciously examine into them, and suspend judgment, save in the presence of the most convincing evidence. 35 36 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT In the quest of truth concerning the preternatural, incred- ulity is no less an impediment than its opposite extrenie. A counterfeit is a convincing proof of the worth of the original, and to deny the latter in order to guard against its imitation, is an act of folly proper to the skeptic. In our modern irreligious world it has become the fashion to view the pre- ternatural no less than the supernatural with hostile gaze and to ridicule it as a chimera. Materialists of every .hue, and their name is legion, dogmatize against all that is above the natural, and in this they are consistent with their prin- ciples. Denying a priori the reality of everything that is beyond our sense perceptions, they are perforce obliged to deny the existence of all incorporeal beings, such as God, the immateriality of the human soul, and angels good and bad of the spirit world. The illogical position of the Mate- rialistic school is well exposed by an English scientist who says: "No one has seen the ether of space. It does not appeal to sense, and we know of no way of getting hold of it. Further, it is a thing of incredibly opposed characteristics, an anomaly hardly to be understood, and with some difficulty to be even credited with existence. Yet concerning this material ether, which no one can see or understand, Material- ists make an absolute Act of Faith"; while the truth of God's existence, the evidence for which is much stronger than for that of ether, they flatly deny.^ That their a' priori dogmatism is based on nothing more than mere assumptions is clear to every man who perceives himself to be endowed, not only with sense perception, but also with a rational soul, which enables him to rise by his intellectual faculty above corporeal things of sense, and, unfettered by time and space, to revel in the contemplation of sublime and spiritual truths, which are wholly beyond sense perception. Moreover, to deny all accounts of the preternatural, the Materialist must close his eyes to well authenticated facts of the ancient and modern world. In our own times exists a Society for Psychical Re- 1. Cf. The Scientific Outloolt by Sir Oliver Lodgp in the 'TathoHc Mind," Dec. 22, 1913. ■ atnoiic REAL NATURE OF THE WEIRD SISTERS 37 search,^ whose object is the scientific investigation of all those psychical manifestations which have either been ignored or doubted by natural science and by experimental psychol- ogy. Its members, men of science and of all religious shades of belief, both Christian and non-Christian, are well known to the learned world of England and America. Confining their researches solely to remarkable authentic cases, they employed the most modern scientific and psychological methods of investigation, with the result that many of the phenomena proved to be truly preternatural,^ and that the claims of some spiritists were so undoubtedly approved that many researchers, hithei"to skeptical, were led to profess a belief in spiritism. The effects produced could not be explained on purely natural grounds ; they were disproportioned or foreign to the means employed, and necessarily required the action of some intellectual though invisible agent. Such deeds, how- ever, as every Christian knows, cannot be regarded as the work of God or His angels; and, therefore, must be ascribed to evil spirits, who are ever anxious to meddle in human affairs, in order to deceive and seduce man from God.^ This invisible presence of evil agents in our moral world is admitted by many non-Catholic Shakespearean critics. In reference to the nature of the "Weird Sisters, Professor Dowden says that the history of the race and the social medium in which we live and breathe have created forces of good and evil, which are independent of the will of each individual man and woman. No great realist in art has hesitated to admit the existence of a dual force which is known to theologians as 1 In 1898, the membership of the English Society under Sir William Croolces numbered 900, and its American branch. 4S0. 2 "Researches in the Phenomena of Spiritism," by Sir William Crookes. .s' The l-ocietp for Psychical Research has scientifically verified eleven phvsical phenomena of Spiritism. That of Phantom Forms and Faces is very pertinent. Sir William Crookes and his associates witnessed the materializa- tion of hum.in forms and faces which appeared in such a manner as to become objectively and simultaneously visible to all persons assisting at the experiment. Human forms became visible and gradually developed in solidity and clearness. Sometimes the entire form, enveloped in what seemed a kind of light drapery, moved about the room, spolce in audible whispers, and after a time melted away again before their eyes. When the conditions were favorable they sometimes have all the characteristics of real human beings with all the functions of a human body in full working order. (Phenomena of flpiriiism, by Sir William Crookes ; also Modern Spiritism, by J. G. Raupert, c. II.) 38 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT divine grace and Satanic temptation. The idealist may dream of divorcing himself from the large impersonal life of the world, and of erecting himself into an independent will, but in reality there is no such thing as "naked manhood." Between the evil within and the evil without, subsist a terrible sympathy and reciprocity; and the constitution which is morally enfeebled supplies appropriate nutriment for the germs of disease. It is enough to know that such powers, auxiliary to vice, do exist outside ourselves, and that Shakes- peare was scientifically correct in his statement of the fact.^ "The undeniable though dark and mysterious connection between this life and the next," says Professor Ulrici, "constrains us to ascribe to the spiritual world a certain influence on the spirits yet embodied on this earth. In this truth lies the profound meaning of the Christian doctrine of devils and evil spirits," who, all intent on man's moral ruin, boast with the arch-fiend: "To do aught good, never will be our task. But ever to do ill, our sole delight. As being the contrary to His high will Whom we resist." {Farad. Lost, Bk. 1.) To ignore this truth is to miss the ke y to the tragedy of ~~ Macbeth. _The_idea .oLa^apiritual realuLOi. demons who, fuU \ of, malignity, exercise their dark secret powers to gain human \ souls to the cause of evil, and do gain them, except so far as \ they are opposed, has/been a definite conception, recognized Ithrovigh^jll^ times, and. in.. alL- stages of ^vilization. As a IdeBnite conception, it is found embodied in a Dr. Faust in the legendary lore of every race. Shak^jgeare^himself^ was penetrated with the idea. For its truth he saw many proofs iETSacf id' Scripture. Uencej recognizing the existence of evil s pirits that_with_«Saianie— oucning- lie -in- wait for human souls^hisjClmstian mind -clothed them with visible forms in the new creation of the .Weird Sisters. As he makes evil- spirits prime agents in the drama, it was expedient to reveal their iiivisible presence and secret action to his audience by 1, Shakespeare, His Mind and Art, p. 220. REAL NATURE OF THE WEIRD SISTERS 39 .portraying them under some corporeal and visible __form. He vras'lamiliar-witfar ^ense rtslEaem^^gitee which speaks of the three fatal sisters who dwell in the deep abyss. They were goddesses of the infernal regions, and in the pagan notion of human destiny led doomed men into the way of calamity. Shakespeare, however, preferred to picture the tempters of Macbeth in some visible guise which would be more intelligible to his audience. Hence, the evil spirits that cross the chieftain's path on the blasted heath at Forres, he clothes with objective forms as witnessed in the Weird Sisters. They must, therefore, be clearly distinguished from the traditional witches of the play, which Middleton later intro- duced for spectacular effect. For such witches Macbeth has but contemptuous words, "You black and midnight hags!" But the "three fatal sisters," the "Vestal Virgins of hell," are horrid anomalies that surprise and mystify himself and Banquo. Shakespeare 's belief in demons and diableries was common to Protestants as well as to Catholics of his day. It was in conformity with the doctrine taught in Apostolic times, and was retairied by the various Christian sects of the Reforma- tion, even after they had been severed from the Catholic Church. But being still in the formative period, their new basic principle of religion was not yet developed to its logical conclusion, as it is today, when many reject the mystery of the incarnation, the divine inspiration of Sacred Scripture, eternal punishment, and the existence of a personal devil. Such negations would indeed have seemed blasphemous to Elizabethan ears, and in those less tolerant times would have merited for their advocates death at the stake. In Shakespeare's day, however, the new State religion^ adhered to the Catholic doctrine common to Christendom, that Satan and his fallen legions were very real, both in existence and in malicious activity against man and God. At the birth of Christianity, witchcraft and kindred diableries took on a new and distinct meaning, which was 1. Its proper or legal title is, "The Protestant Episcopal Church as Established by Law of Parliament." 40 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT unacceptable and often unintelligible to peoples who, amid the darkness of paganism, had for ages looked upon the state and their religion of idolatry and sorceries as one and insep- arable. In its very origin, Christianity was in its life and doctrines hostile to the principles of evil which dominated the heathen world; its mission was to enlighten men's minds by divine truths, and to redeem them from the slavery in which Satan had so long held them captive. By Apostolic as well as by Scriptural teaching, Satan is a wicked spirit of great intelligence and power, who, impotent in hatred and rage against the Almighty, turns his efforts in malice and in envy against man, the image of God, and by drawing him to perdition seeks to lessen the extrinsic glory of the Creator. Hence, in prosecution of their purpose the arch-fiend and his subordinate demons, strive to set up a dominion in rivalry with that of the Almighty. In consequence, they battle under varied forms against the kingdom of God on Earth, that spiritual organization known as the Catholic Church, and their malevolent power, heightened through human agencies, too often finds expression in persecutions that are waged by their blind dupes, whom they inspire with a hatred as irra- tional as their own is diabolical against the Church. That their existence is a revealed truth was accepted by Shakespeare as it is by every Christian mind. To doubt it, is to question the fundamental truth of Christianity, that the Son of God became incarnate to redeem a fallen race from sin and to destroy Satan's evil works. Apart from the con- stant and universal belief in evil spirits, their .existence is most frequently and emphatically inculcated in Holy Writ. God did not spare the ajagels that sinned.^ The devils also believe and tremble.^ By envy of the devil, death came into the world.^ He that committeth sin is of the devil, for the devil sinneth from the beginning.* After withdrawing man from allegiance to the Creator,^ the arch-fiend made himself the prince of this world," and with his associate demons was 1. 2 Pet. 11 -A. 4. John, 1 Epis. 3 :8. 2. Jas. 11 :19. 5. Gen. 3. 3. Wisdom, 2, 24. 6. John 12:31. REAL NATURE OF THE WEIRD SISTERS 41 worshipped as gods among the gentile nations.^ To the early Christian converts the Apostle writes: "Put you on the armor of God that you may be able to stand against the deceits of the devil ; for our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against Principalities and Powers, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places.^ To the Corinthians he writes : "I fear lest as the serpent seduced Eve by his subtlety, so your minds should be corrupted and fall from the simplicity that is in Christ. For such false prophets are deceitful workmen, transforming themselves into the Apostles of Christ, and no wonder : for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light. " ^ To the same purpose are Shakespeare 's lines : . . "the devil hath power . To assume a pleasing shape. ' ' * ' ' The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose ! " 5 "When devils will their blackest sins put on, They do suggest at first with heavenly shows. ' ' '■ Sacred Scripture is, moreover, replete with Satan's activi- ties among men. An evil spirit said : "I will go forth and be a lying spirit in the mouth of all the prophets of Achab. ' ' ' A demon strangled the successive husbands of Sara.^ Elias by command of God pronounced the sentence of death upon King Ochozias, because having fallen sick he sent messengers to consult Beelzebub, the god of Acheron." After the spirit of the Lord had departed from Saul, he was vexed by an evil spirit, and his last act was like the first, but more significant. He began by consulting Samuel as a diviner, and he ends by consulting a professed sorceress. By the magic rites of the Witch of Endor he hoped to foresee the issue of the approach- ing battle. God meets him even in the cave of Satanic delusions, but as an antagonist. The reprobate king receives 1 Ps Q5 -5 6- 0th., I, lil. 2. Ephes.-6 :11, 11'. T. 3 Kings 22 :22, 3. 2 Cor. 11:3, 13, 14. 8. Tob, 8:3 4. Hamlet, II. ii. 9- * Kings, 16. 5. Merch. of Ven., I, iii. 42 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT by the mouth of the dead Samuel the news that on the morrow he and his sons shall be slain by the Philistines.^ It is, moreover, an undeniable fact that in heathendom many wonders were worked by means of the black art. As the magicians of Pharaoh were enabled by evil spirits to counterfeit some of the miracles of Moses,^ so in the early days of the Church, Satan, by the wonders and illusions of Simon the Magician, attempted to frustrate the force of the true miracles of the Apostles.^ Though sorcery and other forms of diableries flourished among idolatrous peoples, they found no foothold in Israel, where by divine command they were proscribed under the sanction of the direst penalties. "Beware lest thou have a mind to imitate the abominations of those nations; neither let there be found among you any who consulteth soothsayers, or observeth dreams and omens, neither let there be aiiy wizard, nor charmer, nor any that consulteth pythonic spirits, or fortune-tellers, or that seeketh the truth from the dead, for the Lord abhorreth all these abominations. ' ' * This divine law was recognized and enforced from the beginning by the Church of Christendom, and her Scriptural doctrines concerning evil spirits and their wicked designs upon mankind, were accepted by Shakespeare as well as by the populace of England in his day. Hence, his audi- ence readily comprehended the true nature of the Weird Sisters and their diabolical purpose to lure Macbeth to his temporal and eternal ruin. 1. 1 Samuel 28 :19 ; and Cardinal Newman, Character Sketches — Saul. 2. Exod. 7 :11. 3. Acts 8 ;10. i. Deut. 18 :9. CHAPTER VI THE PROPHECIES OF THE WEIRD SISTERS The Poet portrays thej^^ld^^jsterj^as real_^ creaturei7~prescient of the future. Their predictions are accurately fuffillM" eveii TffTKe" siiiallest^^garticulai:. There is, however, naught ^ufp]Fiiing~mTETs7 for transcending mor- tals in perfection of nature and of intellect, they can perceive many things that are obscure or unknown to us. Their greater intelligence is due to the greater excellence of their spiritual nature, and this excellence is proportioned to their nearer approach to the Deity. The more, says the Angelic Doctor, one approaches to the Creator, the more he partakes of the divine perfections; hence, because man as a rational creature is the lowest in the scale of intellectual creation, he reflects in his human soul but obscurely the image of His Maker, while the angelic nature, being immaterial and purely spiritual both in nature and activities, presents a more luminous and perfect image of the Creator. If man is by nature a rational animal, spirits are by nature immaterial and pure intelligences, who, in the pursuit of knowledge, are unhampered by limitations of sense and of gross material elements. If man acquires truth by ratiocination, spirits attain it by intuitive vision. If a man's inferior intellect can reach perfection in the knowledge of truth only by discursive mental operations, only by reasoning from one known truth to another, spirits by their superior intellectual powers can at once be- hold in every truth presented to their gaze all that is con- tained therein, as effects in their causes and causes in their effects ; and, in consequence, they are called pure intelligences, 43 44 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT while man by reason of his discursive method is called rational.^ This intellectual perfection is essential to the nature of every purely spiritual being, whether angelic or demoniacal, and, therefore, even after sin, remains as long as that spiritual nature continues to exist. When in punishment for their rebellion against the Creator, the fallen angels were cast out of heaven, and stripped of those supernatural endowments that were in no manner proper to their nature, "they retained all that was natural or essential to their spiritual existence and activity. In consequence, those evil spirits still possess unimpaired their natural powers of intellect, and, in extent of range and in depth of penetration, excel mortal man more than the wisest philosopher does the untutored savage. Though these fallen spirits can perceive many things which are beyond the scope of our limited mental vision, neverthe- less, they have, like man, their limitations in regard to prophecy. All future events may be known either in them- selves or in their causes.^ One class of causes always and necessarily produce their effects, and these, therefore, may be foretold with certainty, as an astronomer foretells an eclipse. There is, however, another class of causes which, while gen- erally bringing forth their effects, yet do not always and necessarily do so, and in consequence, their action can be predicted not, indeed, with certainty, but only with reason- able conjecture, as when a weather observer foretells a local rain as probable. As evil spirits have, however, a deeper and more universal knowledge than man, and are, moreover, acquainted with hidden powers of nature, they can perceive better the relation between the first and second class of causes and their effects, and consequently can conjecture future events more frequently and with greater preciseness, just as a physician who has a clearer knowledge, not only of the nature and cause of his patient's malady, but also of its efficient remedy, can better prognosticate his restoration to health. There are, however, other causes whose effects depend 1. S. Tliomas, Summa TUeol. 1 Pars. Qu. 5S L'. Ibidem, IIo^ Ilae. Qu. 45. PROPHECIES OP THE WEIRD SISTERS 45 upon what is erroneously called chance, or upon man's free will ; and because such effects are not immutably determined in their causes, we can see them only in themselves, when they are actually present to our eyes. To foretell them with cer- tainty is in the power of God alone; for only before His eternal and infinite mind, all future things are as present. "Show the things that are to come hereafter, and we shall know that ye are gods. " ^ If evil spirits, therefore, cannot foresee with certainty future contingent effects of this third class of causes, they can, nevertheless, wisely conjecture about them, especially since, besides possessing superhuma!!^ acumen, they are also rich in the long experience of thousands of years, during which they have in the temptation of man- kind thoroughly learned the ways of men, and acquired a wide and deep knowledge of human nature, and above all a clear insight into the workings of the human mind and heart. Evil spirit s, moreover, whose perverse nature is confirmed in evil and in" falsehood, a re never prone to tell truths, save a s a means to their ulterior P.urpose oj; feagi^L^iZIaway f r.Qm virtue and from God. ^ThisJ^s jwell_.^Smplified-in,_the, deali ngrof the "WeircTS isters with Macbeth. Having won his confidence by the ruse oI~aleeinmg prophecy, ' which was in truth but a post-f actum declaration, they proceed by decep- tive enigmas to lead him blindly on to ruin. Their ^hird _predictiaa: " All hail Macbeth, that shalt be a. kiny hereafter." ig hasp,q npnn ^ ypll fonndpd coniecturfi that the-^^jhaU be able / ■with the aid of his ruling passion of ambition, tomSiTcrEm . lo seize the crown by bloody usurpation^ the throne once attaihed, they purpose to lead him on to further crime by lying riddles of assured safety. These Macbeth interprets, as they conjectured, to his own advantage; but when in surprise he discovers their fiendish frauds, he exclaims in vexation of soul : 1. Isal. 41:23. 46 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT I pull in resolution, and begin To doubt the equivocation of the fiend That lies like truth. And be these juggling fiends no more believed, That palter with us in a double sense, That keep the word of promise to our ear, And break it to our hope." CHAPTER VII THE TEMPTATION OP MAN BY EVIL SPIRITS To Jth£. Christian, mind the tragedy of Macbeth gives sensible expression to the secret efforts_^ofJhe_£fia:££&_Qf-.e.Yil w hose purpo se is to ruin man by"means of his ruling passio n. That all who wiu live goaiy lives must prepare their souls for trials and persecutions, is a divine axiom/ ,-l£ai£tation is the common lot of all ; because man's present existence is by divine ordination but a short passing life of probation, in which he must align himself with one or the other of the two antagonistic spiritual forces, which have made earth their battle-ground of good against evil: i n brief, m an -must in the present life^ choose t o serve Satan as a slave or God as a free- manj__TJieseJxaths J6SEre~as~ &'stlpjanciples_t6 jieoples of the Elizabethan age, and Sha^sgeare^was^^in^ harmony with the thought "^""I Tis da y. Then, Christians of every type" still accepted Sacred Scripture as the divinely revealed word of God. Its pages are full of the intermeddling of fallen angels with the affairs of men. It teaches that our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities and powers and spirits of wickedness.^ Furthermore, it counsels us not to believe every spirit, but to try them, to see if they be of God.^ The neglect of this counsel has, no doubt, caused many to be deceived by demons who appear as angels of light. If, on the authority of the Sacred Book, Shakespeare believed in the existence of good spirits who are God's "ministers of grace ' ' and ' ' guardians of men, " he no less firmly believed in fallen angels, those counter spirits of evil that from envy and hatred tempt men to moral ruin. They try and experiment 1. Eccl. 2 :1 : 2 Tim. 3 :12. 2. Ephes. 6:12. 3. 1 John 4. 47 48 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT with humankind in order to discover each one's natural dispo- sition to virtue or to vice, with the sole purpose of injuring him by seducing him to sin.^ Such is the special function of Satan and his legions, though too often wicked men wittingly or un- wittingly share in his work. If Sacred Scripture sometimes ascribes temptations to God, it is in a wholly different sense. His trial of man is not to lead him to evil, but to disclose to others his good or evil character. "For the Lord your God trieth you that it may appear whether you love Him with all your heart, and with all your soul or no."^ "Blessed is the man that endureth temptation, for when he hath been proved he shall receive the crown of life which God hath promised to them that love Him. ' ' ^ There are, however, two extremes to be avoided concern- ing man's temptation. The one extreme is the position of those who expressly reject all demonaical temptation ; because it is, as they say, repugnant to the divine attributes of God, and because the demon's action upon the human soul is beyond our comprehension. Such a position is indeed natural to all who, unlike Shakespeare and his contemporaries, no longer hold Sacred Scripture to be the revealed word of God ; but true Christians find in the Holy Book many examples of temptations by evil spirits. It was Satan who deceived man in Eden and attempted the same with Christ, the "Second Adam. " * He corrupted Judas and inspired him to treason,^ and led astray Ananias and Sapphira.^ Our Savior affirms that the sower of cockle is the devil who snatches the word of life from the hearts of men.' "We are exhorted to be vigilant against the demon, to resist him in faith, and to put on the armor of God that we may stand against his wiles. This doctrine, so emphatically inculcated in Sacred Scrip- ture, has, moreover, been defended and expounded by the early Fathers of the Greek and Latin Church.^ None of them 1. St. Thorn., 1 p. Q. 114. A. 2. 2. Deut. 13 :3. 3. James 1 :12. 4. Gen. 3; Apoc. 12; Matth. 4; Mark 1; Luke 4. 5. .Tohn 13 :2, 27. 6. Acts 5:3. 7. Matth. 13 :39 ; Luke 8 :12. 8. Cf. Card. Mazzella, De Deo Creante, p. 304. MAN'S TEMPTATION BY EVIL SPIRITS 49 perceived in man's ttmptation anything repugnant to the attributes of God; for Satan's activity is limited by the ordination of Divine Providence, and, whatever his power, he is unable to force the human will. Hence, how forceful soever be temptation, it is never beyond man's power of resistance, when strengthened by the grace of God. St. Paul affirms: "-God is faithful who will not suffer you to be tempted above that which you are able, but will make also with temptation issue that you may be able to bear it. " ' St. Jerome (A. D. 345) in treating of the Savior's temptation in the desert, writes: "Cast thyself down; that is the voice of the devil who always seeks to hurl men down to ruin ; he can persuade, but he cannot drag down."^ St. Chrysostom (A. D. 347), speaking of those who frequent the theaters rather than the Church, says: "Who has separated them from the sacred sheep fold? You all have the same human nature, but not the same will; hence he has deceived them, but not you."^ St. Augustine (A. D. 354) writes: "Christ came and bound the devil. But if he is bound, why does he still prevail so much? It is true he dominates the tepid, the negligent, and those devoid of a true fear of God. Bound like a chained dog, he can bite only those that in deadly security approach him. He can harm none save the willing; for he injures not by force, but by persuasion; he seeks, but he cannot extort our consent."* St. Chrysostom affirms that God permits temptation for the punishment of sin, for the correction of the sinner, as well as for the manifestation of his own glory ; for by temptation the name of Christ is glori- fied, since by His power the Christian conquers the demon.^ This doctrine of the early Fathers is not only in conformity with the teaching of Holy Writ, but is also illustrated by innumerable examples, of which the most striking is perhaps that chronicled in the poetical book of Job. "As a work of genius and of art it occupies well-nigh the first rank in 1. 1 Cor. 10:13. 2. In Cap. IV. Matth. 3. Horn. 3 de Daemon. 4. Serm. .S7 Inter Opera S. Aug. 5. Horn. 1 de Daemon N. 6. 50 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT Hebrew literature, and is unsurpassed in sublimity of imag- . inative thought by any poem of antiquity."' The hero is an inhabitant of the land of Hus, a man who is "upright and just, fearing the Lord and avoiding evil." In the poem, God is pictured, on the one hand, as delighting in the virtue of his servant, and Satan, on the other, as boasting in confi- dence of his power to seduce him. This confidence springs from his belief that Job's piety is prompted by worldly motives. By God's permission, the demon, with the one exception that he spare Job 's life, is allowed to test his fidelity by the most severe sufferings. Having stricken him in suc- cession with six great afflictions, Satan discovers that instead of shaking his loyalty to God, he but causes his heroic virtue to shine the more brilliantly. In his last attempt, the demon finds auxiliaries in Eliphaz, Baldad, and Sophar, friends of the afflicted man. As friends, they come to condole with him ; but in the erroneous view that suffering is always the result of evil doing, they sit with him in his terrible affliction of mind and body, and day after day, drone into his ears their conviction that he is a great sinner, and that he should repent and confess his transgressions, and perhaps the Lord will forgive him. Job's insistence upon his innocence, they blame, resent, and stigmatize as rank hypocrisy. Their rash judg- ments, are, however, rebuked by the Lord, who, coming in the whirlwind, defends his servant 's innocence, puts an end to his long sufferings, glorifies his well-tried fidelity, and crowns his victory over men and the demon with wondrous munificence. Job 's trial by the demon, like that of Macbeth 's, is an external manifestation of secret temptations that are experienced by many a Christian. Man alone with his natural forces can effect little against the greater and preternatural powers of tempting demons; but, like Job, the Christian is, under trial, fortified secretly by supernatural aid, or grace, all unseen by the tempter, and, in consequence, is enabled to conquer the 1. "Tbe poetry of the book of Job is not only equal to that of any other of the sacred writings, but Is superior to them all, except those of Isaiah alone. "As Isaiah is the most sublime, David the most pleasing and tender, so Job is the most descriptive of all the inspired prophets." — The Poetry of the Hebrews, Blair. MAN'S TEMPTATION BY EVIL SPIRITS 51 arch-enemy of God and man; and from his victory results a manifold good : the Christian is roused to vigilance, perceives- his own vreakness, turns to God in deepened faith and humil- ity, strengthens his virtue, merits for himself, gives glory to his heavenly Father, and by defeating the malicious efforts of a superior being, humbles the gigantic pride of Satan, and overwhelms him with confusion. Since, therefore, man's temptation is not in conflict with the attributes of God, we pass to the other assertion, that temptation by Satan is inadmissible, because we do not under- stand his action upon the human soul. Such an assertion seems inane and forceless ; for no difficulty however great can nullify a truth, since it arises not from the truth itself, but from the limitations of our mind; and especially is this the case with the truths of the unseen and preternatural order. Even within our own visible and tangible creation are there not many facts of whose existence we cannot doubt, though we do not know how they happen ? In like manner, the Poet, like all Christians, accepts the fact of diabolical temptation on the authority of divine revelation, since, he is convinced that such temptation is neither absurd in itself nor repugnant to reason. If man's spiritual soul and its activities offer many difficulties to psychologists, it is but natural that, in view of our material bounds and imperfect mode of sense per- ception, even greater difficulties should exist concerning the invisible action of immaterial spirits upon other spiritual exist- ences like the human soul. To meet these difficulties, the Angelic Doctor offers in his exhaustive treatise of the Summa ^ certain lucid principles in explanation of Satan's mode of tempting man. To tempt is the same as to move the will in some manner to evil, and man's will may be moved interiorly by acting upon it and directly inclining it against moral rectitude. Such interior action on the will is possible to the Creator alone ; for as He is the efficient cause of our intellectual nature and its free wiU, so He alone, as its cause, can move it interiorly. Satan can move the will exteriorly, either by proposing some object 1. 1 pars., Q. 3 et Q. 114. 52 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT soliciting it to evil, or by exciting the passions or sensitive appetites; for it is manifest that in proportion as a man's passions are aroused, his will grows weaker and leaves him more prone to consent; hence, by moving man's bodily spirits and humors Satan can make him more disposed to sin, as for instance, to anger or concupiscence. Evil spirits, further- more, can tempt man by visibly proposing an object which allures him to sin;^ for appearing in some visible form, they can sensibly speak and persuade to evil : thus Satan tempted our protoparent in Eden and our Savior in the desert. An adept from long experience in the use of snares and strata- gems, the "old serpent" is wont to assume various disguises, sometimes, as an angel of light, tempting man to simulated good, and again by assault and violence. It was thus that, according to well authenticated facts, he tempted many of the saints, and in recent times the Venerable Cure d'Ars. It was thus that in the visible form of the Weird Sisters, evil spirits accosted Macbeth, and entangled him in their snares. His curiosity, fanned by an evil passion, made him an easy victim. Satan, says St. Augustine, wishes to excite among men a greater curiosity concerning occult matters, so that, being implicated in their observance, they may become more curious and get themselves more entangled in the manifold snares of pernicious error.^ He is wont gradually to insinuate himself, as in the case of the Weird Sisters, until he has his victim within his power, and then he works on him his evil will. This is well exemplified in the votaries of Spiritism. This ism is not a new discovery of science, as some pretend, or some new light come into the world, but simply the recrudescence of the practice of necromancy with which non- Christian nations are only too familiar, and which the Church has in every age most emphatically condemned. Spiritists, in consequence of their disregard of the divine command, which forbids all superstitious practices and dealings with evil spirits, are deprived of God's grace against the tempter, and, abandoned to their folly, become the blind dupes of lying 1. St. Thorn, de Malo, C. 3 A. 4. 2. Apud Summa Theol. IIo-, Iloe. Qu. 96, A. 3, ad 2. MAN'S TEMPTATION BY EVIL SPIRITS 53 spirits, who lead them to deny the truth of the incarnation of the Son of God, of His supernatural religion, of sin and its future punishment, and of the essential distinction between vice and virtue, until, in fine, they lose all notion of morality, and in many eases their end is insanity or suicide. From his own experience, says Dr. W. Potter, who was formerly a spiritist : ' ' They teach that there is no high, no low, no good, no bad. That murder is right, adultery is right, lying is right, slavery is right. That nothing we can know can injure the soul or retard its progress. That it is wrong to blame any; that none should be punished; that man is a machine and not to blame for his conduct. ' ' ^ The late Professor Lom- broso, after long experimenting with spiritism, manifested much anxiety from fear of losing his mind ; and the late Pro- fessor James of Harvard University, an eminent psychical investigator of the preternatural, displayed a very distinct leaning to the Catholic view of the proscribed cult.^ The words of St. John, which were called forth by the supersti- tions of a pagan world, are clearly applicable to our Material- istic age: "Every spirit that dissolveth Jesus is not of God; and this is Antichrist of whom you have heard that he cometh, and he is now already in the world. ' ' ^ Satan employs another method of temptation,^ that of invilTHtypTDp'o'sing an object alliciting To sin ; and this he can effect by his preternatural power of moving and disturb- ing man's imagination; for it is manifest that imaginary apparitions are sometimes caused in man from local mutations of his bodily spirits and humors. The demon can again invisibly propose an object by inward and preternatural / action upon the senses by means of the humors of the body,/ in consequence of which the senses will be diversely affected.y Hence, though evil spir its ha,ve iio_power to act o n man 's w ill i nteriorly, they can, nev erth eless" by presenting ob.iects to th e senses, by rousing the i magination, by stimulating the pas- 1. Of. Modern Spiritism, J. Godfrey Raupert, 2 Edition, p, 201. 2. Spiritualistic Phenomena and Their Interpretation, by J. Godfrey Baupert. 3. 1 John 4 :3. 4. St. Thomas, Summa Theol. 1 pars., Q. Ill, A. 4. 54 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT sions, a nd by external suggestion . ftxtftrioHv incite the _will tj[]eyjL_jbifiisans-nin''.e ia-^Iiaui-fiLflwer, ..t.hp.y, p.nrifi,i:jTi^in,. sinlijl habits by inspi ring thein with a false.fe eling of sficuritv. If gTi(rh-Der sgffs""gesire to turnironi evil, t he y distur b them with f^ars, harass them with imaginary obstacles, perplex them with sophistical reasonings, and entangle them more and more I in their snares, until, sunk in the quagmire of despair, they resign themselves to their fate as did Macbeth in the words: . . . ' ' I am ia blood Stepp 'd in so far that, should I wade no more, Eeturning were as tedious as go o'er." Opposed to the one extreme that denies man's temptation by Satan, is the other no less odious, which affirms that all sin is instigated by the devil ? Though Satan be the indirect and remote cause of all sin,^ because he seduced our protoparent, from whom all receive their fallen human nature with its proneness to evil, he is not, however, in any manner the direct cause of every sin. Sacred Scripture clearly teaches that not all sins are committed at the instigation of Satan. "The imagination and thought of man's heart are prone to evil from his youth;" ^ "Every man is tempted by his own con- cupiscence, being drawn away and allured;"^ "whence are wars and contentions among you? are they not from your concupiscences which war in your members?"* Our Savior teaches : ' ' From the heart come forth evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false testimonies, and blasphe- mies." ° Man's freedom in his sinful nature affords an all- sufficient cause for sin; for it is indeed nothing strange that man, who always bears within his fallen nature a domestic enemy in his conflicting passions, should often sin without the instigation of Satan. Hence St. Chrysostom (A. D. 347) says, that man 's sins arise from human depravity, and St. Gregory (A. D. 326) expands the same truth in the following lines: 1. St. Thomas, Summa Theol. 1 p., Q, 114, A. 3. 2. Gen. 8:21. a. St. Jam. 1:14. 4. St. Jam. 4:1. 5. St. Matth. 15:19. MAN'S TEMPTATION BY EVIL SPIEITS 55 "Quid culpam in hostem semper ipsi vertimus Cmn nostra praestent robur ipsi criminal Te criminare prorsus, aut certe magis, Ignis tuus nam est: flamma vere daemonis.i Since, then, man's passions kindle the fires of sin and Satan but fans their flame, his power is proportioned to the moral disposition of the person tempted, and is, therefore, greater or less in accordance as a man cultivates or flouts the moral virtues, and restrains or indulges his passions. Passions, when indulged in their tendency to evil, necessarily create in man an affinity with fallen spirits or demons, and, in consequence, there arises between them an harmonious relation, an affinity, one for the other, and man's soul, by reason of this secret affinity, not only attracts evil spirits, but even welcomes their visits. Thus Macbeth, when bent on crime, gladly welcomed the Weird Sisters in their first visit, and afterwards eagerly sought their presence ; and Lady Macbeth, intent on murder, invoked them as "the spirits that tend on mortal thoughts, murderous ministers that wait on nature's mischief." Their power is, therefore, always relative, because it depends on the affinitive tendencies of mans passions to evil, and in propor- tion as those tendencies are stronger or weaker, they give these demons a greater or less power in leading him to moral ruin. 1. Why always impute our sins to Satan, when our passions give him power to tempt us? Let us blame ourselves at least in the main; for we kjndle the fire, and be but fans the flames. CHAPTER VIII THE TEMPTATION OF MACBETH To judge aright of Shakespeare's metaphysical,, moral and religious meaning of the drama, it is necessary to guard against the ordinary critical error concerning the origin of Macbeth 's criminal purpose. To suppose that the Poet repre- sents the spirits of darkness as absolutely and gratuitously seducing Macbeth, manifestly vitiates and debases the moral to be drawn from the tragedy. Hence, the need of solving the question, whether Macbeth projected the murder of Dun- can, because of his encounter with the Weird . Sisters, or whether they accosted him after the projection of murder, because, says Mr. Fletcher, "They are privileged to see the mind's construction, where human eye cannot penetrate — in the mind itself."^ But can evil spirits penetrate the human mind and read therein its secret, hidden thoughts?^ Sacred Scripture aifirms the contrary by attributing such power to God alone: "Hear thou from Heaven, from thy high dwelling place : for thou only knowest the hearts of the children of men ; " * " The heart is perverse and unsearchable, who can know it? I am the Lord that search the heart and prove the reins;* "Searching into the divisions of the soul, and the spirit, He is a discerner of the thoughts and the in- tents of the heart." ' Moreover, the fact of the Saviour's read- ing the secret thoughts of men, is adduced by the Evangelists as one of the proofs of His divinity .° Upon this point St. Jerome argues: "Jesus saw their secret thoughts, and no one 1. Witches Pharmaropeia, p. 142. Apud Fnrness. 2. Card. Mazzella De Objecto Cognltionls Angellcae, De Deo Creante, p. ' 3. 11 Paralip 6 :S0. 4. .lerem. 17 :9-10. 5. Heb. 4 :12. 6. Math. 9 :4; 12 :25 56 THE TEMPTATION OF MACBETH 57 can read our secret thoughts save God alone ; therefore Christ is God." St. Ambrose says: "The Lord wishing to save sinners, proved His divinity by His knowledge of their secret thoughts."^ St. Augustine says of the saintly Job: "He worshipped God, gave alms, and what he did in his heart no one knew, not even Satan, but God knew."^ Such secret thoughts are, however, understood to comprehend only interior acts of the intellect and will, which are in no manner manifested exteriorly either by word or sign, or by move- ment of any sense or passion. "Satan can know," affirms St. Jerome, "the interior acts of man's intellectual soul only by exterior movements. ' ' ^ And says St. Augustine : ' ' Spirits know, not only the dispositions of men when manifested by words, but also their intellectual thoughts when expressed by certain sensible signs."* Evil spirits, therefore, cannot know man's secret thoughts" and purposes with certainty. If they can, at times, by reason of their greater intellectual acumen and experience, con- jecture them more or less correctly, nevertheless, they labor by various wiles to discover man's interior disposition with the view of tempting him to that vice to which he is most^ prone. St. Ignatius Loyola, in a treatise on discernment of spirits, lays down the following rule: "As an able general who wishes to capture a citadel first takes a careful survey to find where it is weakest, and most open to attack, and then begins the assault, so the arch-enemy of our human nature carefully examines our state and our position in regard to the theological, cardinal, and moral virtues, and then exerts all his power against us at that particular part where we are weakest. We should, therefore, be beforehand with him, and examine in what we are most deficient, or into what fault we most frequently fall. ' ' ' But the weakest part of man 's nature and the most open to attack is his ruling, or predominant pas- sion. If once mastered, it becomes the most powerful engine 1. In Luc. L. 5, n. 12. 2. Serm. 91, de Script. 3. In Ps. 16. 4. De Divinat, c. 5. 5. Spiritual Exercises, Discernment of Spirits, 1st Treatise, Rule 14, 58 A GREAT SOUL IN CONFLICT for good; but if uncontrolled, it enslaves man and inevitably leads liim to the lowest depths of degradation. ^Macbeth 's ruling passion, which he n urtured se^r etly^as jin jesjl .ambi- tj on"for''flie' 6fmTi';'V:MrWrau^^ eMmmi:h:¥--^^^' ml.has for evil, it attracted the'attention of malevolent spiri±s,_whose purpose wastoauic ken the wicked design already ger mmat- ingin his mirLdj~and to foment the mischief already brewin g injusjieart. Tliey knew better than his royal master, "who tells us, '^ffiere is no art to find the mind's construction in the face." They visit him, because he invites them, because in secret sympathy with them he willfully opens wide the portals of his inner world which they enter, and breathing into his soul the contagion of hell they quicken its germs of evil into vitality and action. Another Ignatian principle is that "evil spirits, speaking only to the imagination and the senses, act upon the human soul according to the attitude it assumes toward them. If a man" be friendly, they flatter him; if hostile they trouble him. ' ' This principle is exemplified in the action of the Weird Sis- ters upon Macbeth. At their salutation : "Ail hail, Macbeth, that shalt be king hereafter," he is not only visibly surprised at their knowledge of his secret thoughts and aspirations, but also pleased with their flattering words, which he accepts as true prophecy. He is, moreover, sorely disappointed when, deaf to his eager com- mand to tell him more, they vanish into airy nothing before his very eyes. They must wait for the poisoned leaven to ferment and work havoc in* his soul : Macbeth. Stay, you imperfect speakers, tell me more : . . . Say from whence You owe this strange intelligence? or why TJpon this blasted heath you stop our way With such prophetic greetings? Speak I charge you. (Witches vanish.) Would they had stayed!" THE TEMPTATION OF MACBETH 59 His subsequent action, when doubting whether the "super- natural soliciting" was good o^ evil, recalls another Ignatian principle, which teaches how/to distinguish good from evil spirits by their mode of action and the end they seek. "As the good angel's object is the welfare of the soul and the bad angel's its unhappiness, it |ollows that if, in the progress of our thoughts, all is well and tends to good, there is no occasion for uneasiness ; but if, on the contrary, we perceive any devia- tion whatsoever toward evil or even a slight unpleasant agita- tion, there is reason to fear that the action is that of the evil spirit. ' ' Macbet h,. fla-..a^ hristian ;.--3iias.>-no-^les&^AMMxe^than B anquo that the "Weird S isters wera., pxet.fti:na.tura,LlUnstru- ments of darkness" - — agents of the "Father of Lies,"„^^d that any communication with them was not only dangerous but lUicitrrBut t heir flattering promise of royalty was unction to his ambitious s ouT, and prompted jan ardent desire^ tlfaf* it prove true. Banauo perc^ijces^Jiis. ■mfim.t.a.l,ag,itati