m AND CIVILIZED \_ RUSSIA CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY '>, Cornell University Library DK 71.P63 1879 Savage and civilized Russia 3 1924 028 426 819 The original of this bool< is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31 92402842681 9 Demy Octavo. Cloth, Is. Qd. {Longmans and Go.) "SAVAGE AND CIVILIZED EUSSIA." By W. R. OPINIONS OF THE PRESS. "The Globe:' "The pregnant facts he marshalls are amply sufficient, we should imagine, to make the most inveterate Eussophile in England doubt whe- ther Muscovite predominance could ever become a reaUy civilizing influence in the highest sense of that term If the world could be rendered better by being crushed under a Juggernaut of Military despotism as remorseless as cruel, if mankind might be improved by the persistent development of its fighting instincts, if the highest purpose to which human beings can be put, is to place them in array of battle — then, indeed, a good deal may be said in favour of the Eussian method of civi- lization. The present book brings out in strong relief the deeply significant fact that the Russian people are not one whit behind their rulers in hun- gering for foreign conquests Savage and unlettered as Ivan (The Terrible) was, he discovered the natural disposition of his people for foreign conquest, and they pardoned him his butcheries on account of his annexa- tions." " A book that everyone ought to read who cares to understand the influences which have been and still are at work to render Russia the most aggressive Power in the world. If anyone desires to obtain a true view of Eiissia, historical, social, military, and national, we recommend a diligent study of this book, evidently compiled with much labour of research." " The Morning Advertiser." "The materials are selected with great skill and sense, and cover a sufficiently wide range. The book is valuable, as exhibiting Russia in the various stages of her development, savagery, subjection, triumph, and aggression. The prospects of an invasion of India from, the North, are clearly set forth." '■'•Notes and Queries." "W. R. has herS got up materials whereby to get a general verdict against the mendacity, ferocity, and utter untrustworthiness of the Musco- vite policy." "All who dislike the Tartar as much as some do the Turk, will be delighted with the book." " Tlie Bock." "A remarkable work, which even more laboriously than any of its predecessors, lays bare the springs of Russian ambition. * * * This lan- guage is not one whit too strong to apply to those who still profess to- believe the assurances of the Russian autocrat." " The Westminster Review." "RUSSIA," by D. Mackenzie Wallace, M.A. " SAVAGE & CIVILIZED RUSSIA," by "W. R. "As to this question (Russian Designs), we have the advantage of. having before us the distinct statements of an apologist for Russian Aggres- sion, and of a writer who takes a very extreme view with reference to the unjustiiiable nature of Russian territorial advancement. We think it due to Mr Wallace, to examine with care everything he says, as we cannot but think that his conclusions are not justified by the facts he adduces ; and an error having the currency of his authority might be pecidiarly pernicious." " Russia has always been and still is willing to volunteer police services to her neighbours, and the pohceman who enters to keep the peace, gene- rally turns out in time to be the man in possession." " The writer of ' Savage and Civilized Russia' holds a very strong and not altogether unjustifiable view of the aggressive tendencies of Russia. His own opinion may be fuUy expressed in the words of the same historian (Karamsin), who said ; — " ' The object and character of our military policy has invariably been to seek to be at peace with everybody, and to make conqi^est without war ; always keeping ourselves on the defensive, placing no faith in the friend- ship of those whose interests do not accord with our own, and losing no opportunity of injiu'ing them without ostensibly breaking our treaties with them,' — and he goes far to make good his position Philanthropy has been the constant pretext of Russia, for wars during which human nature was outraged by the cruelties which were perpetrated, and although the stories of some of these atrocities are now old, human nature stands aghast that men could perpetrate such barbarous crimes. No Nation has suc- ceeded in making war so utterly horrible and revolting as the Russians. They have given examples, these philanthropic people, which human beings will do well to avoid^" " He is not so well-informed as to the country, as Mr Wallace, but he seems to have read, with care, the Hterature which bears upon the tra- ditional and present pohcy of Russia. His book professes to be a hand- book of the subject, and the various opinions of which it is mainly com- posed, seem to have been carefully.ipollected." " But, if we come to a conclusion adverse to that of Mr Wallace, and in accord with that which ' W. R.' would impress upon us, if we believe that Russia is an aggressive and grasping power, which, although its hands are already too full of lands and countries — the spoils of the Nations^is still to continue its career of territorial robbery, and is now clutching at Turkey with its inordinate avarice and with its vindictive voracity, then it becomes a question of importance to determine on which side the chances of success really lie If she stiU aspires to a career such as that which she has already achieved by dishonesty and violence, her history will find a place in some future Newgate Calendar of the Nations." SAVAGE AND CIVILIZED RUSSIA. BY (W. E.) G. W. ROYSTON-PIGOTT, M.A. M.D. Cantab,, r.R.S., MEMEEB OP THE EOTAL COLLEGE Or PHYSICIANS, LONDON ; FELLOW or THE OAMBKIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, BOTAL A3TB0N0MICAL AND BOYAL MIOEOSOOPIOAL SOCIETIES ; FORMEBLY FELLOW 01" SI PEIEe's COLLEGE, CAMBEIDGE. SECOND EDITION. WITH AN INTEODUCTION BY THE REV. FREDERICK ARNOLD, OF CHEIST OHUECH, OXFOBD. LONDON : LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO. 1879 [All Rights reserved.] PRINTED BT 0. J. OLAY, M.A. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. PREFACE. In presenting tliis volume to English readers, the author gladly acknowledges the primary assistance obtained from almost every available source of infor- mation, on Russian, affairs, within his reach : nearly fifty separate authors having been dihgently searched for materials germane to the various topics treated. The earher chapters are principally derived froin Russian sources. The life of Ivan the Terrible contains a literal translation of selected portions from Karamsin, "the Russian Livy." Russia has had her stages in development — savagery, subjection, triumph, and aggression. But no handy book is now extant embracing these questions. The necessary information is scattered over so vast a field of English and foreign literature as to be practically inaccessible to the busy reader of to-day. That this work may be found to fill up a manifest gap is the earnest desire of the writer. The subject is full of an abiding interest. Russia, on her war path, must one day be confronted by the power of England to arrest her march. Feb., 1879. P. 11. INTEODUCTOEY CHAPTEE. The present work, of which a Second Edition is now presented to the reader, brings together a large body of information drawn together from many sources, respecting the history, the condition, and the political aims of Russia. The absorbing subject of interest at the present moment is found in the relations between Russia and Turkey, and the mode in which those relations affect England and the world. If ever the definition of history is to be justified, that it is philosophy teaching by examples, it is at the present time, when the lessons of the past, writ large and legible, should be our guidance in the present crisis. From these lessons of the past we may derive the lights which will illustrate the present perplexed and stormy conditions. It is much to be regretted that in this country we have hardly any adequate history either of Russia or Turkey. Karamsin's great work on Russian history. Von Hanflmer's great work on Turkish history, are only known, unless fragmentarily, through the medium of French transla- tions. Under such circumstances, a careful and condensed abstract of a Russian history, such as is presented in the following pages, may be of much service to the general reader, and indeed that information is hardly to be found elsewhere in an available form. It is not so much with the vast mass of details of Russian history that Dr Royston-Pigott's work is concerned, as with the current and tendencies of that history. He carefully 62 VI INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. Tvorks out the aggressive tendency of the northern nations gravi- tating towards the southern sea-board, the political immorality which has organised a system of diplomatic perfidy, the system of encroachment which has become an historical law in Russian development, the constant threat which the overshadowing power of Russia offers to the peace and liberties of the world. The present crisis is the natural outcome of antecedent history, and the conditions of the problem have, in point of fact, long been studied and foretold by students of history. The crisis constitutes one of the great revenges of time, and illustrates the law which the wise Thucydides noted, and the tendency of history to repeat itself. The coming of the Turks into Europe has been termed by Mr Gladstone the hinge of European history. A stream of immigrant warriors repeatedly passed from the Hellespont. One tract of the south-east of Europe after another rapidly fell into their hands, and they substantially possessed the Byzantine Empire before they con- quered Constantinople itself That Empire possessed no great historian, but it nevertheless left us the most complete and fascinating of all histories. The Greek Empire yearly narrowed its territory ; Greek society grew more corrupt and effete every day. The converse has happened in our own day. The terri- tory that had been gradually won has been gradually lost. Constantinople and its immediate territory remains to the Turk as once it alone remained to the Greek Empire. It would add to the irony of fate if the Greeks should once again possess Constantinople, and form a bulwark Empire against Russia. It is a great drawback that the experiment of Hellenic freedom has hardly been successful, and Greece and the character of the Greek by no means stands high on the marts and ex- changes of Europe. It is an ethnological mistake to suppose that the present Hellenes are the descendants of the heroes of Marathon. The students of Gibbon and Mr Finlay will recall that in the tenth century, before the Turkish power had developed, the Russians overran Bulgaria, and advanced INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. Vil through the passes upon Constantinople. They have shown themselves impartially wishing to occupy Constantinople either under a Christian or non-Christian power. Their great object is the occupation of Constantinople. The great interest of civilization is, by whatever methods, to prevent that occupation. At the time of the final crusade there was a prophecy that in the last days the Russians should possess Constantinople. This belongs to that order of political prophecies whose ten- dency is to fulfil themselves. From the immeasurable steppes of the north, t?ie womb and hive of nations, there always ' pressed downwards towards the south a superincumbent mass of humanity. By a natural afBnity the northern barbarian always desires the rich plains, the cultivated slopes, the wealthy cities, the expansive sea-boards of the south. This has been the course of the Huns, of the Calmucks, of Tamerlane, of Genghis Khan. The Russ obeys the law which first brought the Turk into Europe. Gibbon triumphantly asked, towards the close of the eighteenth century, the century which was to pass away in storm and convulsion, whence were to come the barbarians who should overrun the world as they once had destroyed the Roman Empire. The answer would be that in the far north, the vast laboratory of the nations, the same agencies are at work, the irresistible impulse southward, the movement of vast hardy multitudes from the forest and the steppes. Allowing for the altered conditions of modern life, for the changed development of unaltered instincts, Russia now represents the force and terrors of the old northern hordes. The possession of Turkey would give her all for which she craves. It would give her the development of her resources, the increase of her population, the establishment of marts and havens. Above all, as Napoleon said, the possession of Constantinople means the Empire of the world. In the later Ottoman history, it is not the Venetian, not the Hungarian, not the Austrian, but it is Russia who is the persistent foe, the embodied threat of Turkey. Twice her army has stormed the Viu INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. passes of the Balkans, and has been within a few marches of Constantinople; once and again her fleet has sailed through the pillars of Hercules and given victorious battle to that Ottoman navy which, in its days of insolent strength, had once swept all the Mediterranean shores. But it seems written in the fates, that although Russia may win the frontier lands and even pierce to the heart of the Empire, it is not destined to attain the coveted possession. As Montesquieu pointed out, whenever Russia attained a certain point in the satisfaction of her am- bition, the Western maritime powers would be sure to interfere. Some combination of the kind is being effected at the present. A war between Turkey and Russia always passes into the higher regions of the supreme interests of Society. The general course of Russian history is rapidly and clearly indicated in the following pages. Lately we have had frightful pictures drawn of the ferocity which characterized the Turkish immigration into Europe. It is impossible to say that this portraiture has been overcharged. The Turk, with his steed and his scymitar, was once the most frightful picture which presented itself to the European imagination. That incubus of terror and apprehension which Napoleon inspired during the years in which his vast power was a deadly shadow projected over Europe, only faintly mirrored the dread and urgency of the Ottoman domination. Titian has a famous picture in which he represents a Venetian nobleman arrayed in his armour, with his wife and children around him, with sad calm eyes looking into a terrible futurity as he proposes to encounter the terrible Osmanli. The grass never grew where the hoof of the Ottoman steeds had passed. They kept no faith with ambassador or soldier. Their mission, for the time being, was to exterminate and destroy. In the lives of the first twelve great Sultans we have horrible instances of personal ferocity. But in contemporary Russian history there are deeds and scenes which might well challenge a comparison with the worst Turkish "atrocities," and infinitely surpass them in horror. INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. ix The cruelties of Hussian Czars are such as could hardly have entered the perturbed imagination of demons. The readers have only to refer iu these pages to the sketch of Peter the Great, or the narrative abridged from Karamsin of Ivan the Terrible\ The deeds of an Amurath or a Mohammed shrink in the comparison. That Upas blight which once belonged to the Osmanli has been transferred to the Muscovite. The " divine figure from the north " comes red-handed from Turk- istan, from Circassia, from Poland. Here again our readers may be especially referred to the chapters on "Imperial Russian Policy," and ''Eussian occupation." The physical power of Russia, backed by the subtlest machinations, has been steadily creeping on, with the deadly certitude of the Cholera or the Plague. Its growth has been inimical to the development of intellect, to the spirit of liberty, to the aspi- rations of moral life. Its literature, which now exhibits vast proportions, does not exhibit a single intellect of the first order, to assume a co-ordinate rank with " the masters of those who know.'' The blighting effects of an iron despotism are terrible in every nationality to which it has been drawn in withering contact. Such reflections would be dispirited and despairing but for the belief that an inexorable limit will be placed by Europe to this ever threatening expansion. To use an inspired Hebrew phrase, " Thus far shalt thou go, and no farther, and here shall thy proud waves be stayed." The first conflict between Turk and Muscovite took place in the reign of Selim the Second. That profound ruler had formed a plan of uniting by a canal the waters of the Don and the Volga, and so opening up a passage from the Black Sea to the Caspian (nearly united by railway) and multiplying the mutual commerce of Europe and Asia. Some traces of this canal are still visible, and the scheme will probably be ^ One of the critics of the first edition ohjeoted to the author's use of a French version of the Bussian of Earamsiu. He ought to have known that Karamsin was an excellent French scholar, that he carefully superintended the French version, and gave it his entire sanction. X INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. one day carried into completion. We read how, while the work was proceeding, a body of men with uncouth figures, strange features, and barbarous language, sallied out from a neighbouring town and cut the workmen into pieces. These were Muscovite subjects of Ivan the Terrible ; this was the first known encounter between Turk and Russian. The modem history of the two nations is now mainly occupied by their internecine strife. That history conducts us from battle to battle, from siege to siege, from treaty to treaty. At the present moment that the more recent treaty between Russia and Turkey is absorbing public attention, it may be useful if we rapidly glance at the diplomatic history, which will il- lustrate the gradual progress of Russian innovation and the ways in which England has intervened in the affairs of the East of Europe. The first treaty known in the public law of Europe and of which the text is preserved, was in 1699, between Peter the Great and Mustapha II. Von Hammer says that this treaty — the Peace of Carlowitz — is to be studied with peculiar care. It was the first time that either Turkey or Russia took part in a European Congress, England and Holland being the other Powers. At this time Russian statecraft was mainly devoted to its relations with Sweden. The treaty was brought about by the mediation of England, through Lord Paget, the English Ambassador at the Porte. All that Russia agreed to in the first instance was an armistice of two years, afterwards ex- tended to thirty. The territorial losses of Turkey were im- mense. Russia took Azoff; Austria, Hungary and Transyl- vania ; and Venice the Morea. Twelve years later was the famous Treaty of the Pruth, in which Turkey recovered all the losses it had experienced in the Treaty of Carlowitz. The war which this Treaty terminated was originally caused by the refusal of the Ottomans to eject Charles the Twelfth of Sweden from their territories. Peter had incautiously pushed too far, and found himself hemmed in INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. xi by superior forces in a most unfavourable position. The catas- trophe very nearly anticipated that of Sedan. He was saved by the tact and courage of his consort Catharine. She negotiated a treaty, and made abundant use both of diplomatic finesse and direct bribery. This was the most favourable treaty which was ever made in favour of Turkey. The preamble to the Treaty recapitulated the desperate condition to ■which Peter was reduced. Peter had to renounce the southern frontier which he had achieved, and Turkey subsequently recovered the Morea from Venice. Here again the characteristic craft of the Eussians was manifested. They were slow and reluctant in executing the provisions of the Treaty. A second Treaty was necessary, two years later, in 1713. Seven years later another Treaty was made. Russia was then threatened by a formidable coalition, and she thought it her interest to swear eternal friendship with Turkey. It has suited her interests to do the same on several other occasions. The insincerity was exhibited by another war which broke out not many years later. The Russians were restless and dis- satisfied with the conditions of the Treaty of the Pruth. True to her pxjlicy of encroachment, the Russians had made advances on the Crimea. The war between the Czarina Anne and Mahmoud II. terminated in the Treaty of Belgrade, sometimes called the Treaty of Nissa. We now come to the Treaty of Kainardji, on which all later diplomatic history is based. The Czar Nicholas used to speak of this as "the glorious treaty" (1774). Von Hammer brings his Ottoman history to a conclusion at this point, be- lieving that with the conclusion of this treaty the independence of Turkey comes to an end. One of the conditions was that the Crimea should be formed into an independent State. This may give us an anticipation of what may happen in the case of a Principality of Bulgaria. Eleven years later this part of the treaty became a dead letter, by Russia taking forcible Xll INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. possession of the Crimea. The free navigation of the inland water was conceded, with the co-protectorate of Moldavia and Wallachia. Until it suited the political purposes of Eussia she had taken no note of the frightful evils which prevailed in future Roumania. Turkey lost the territory between the Dneiper and the Boug. The two special clauses of this treaty, which proved momentous with future consequences, were the seventh and fourteenth, on which Nicholas subsequently based his extravagant claims. These clauses permitted Russia to erect a Church in Constantinople, specifying its position, and also permitted Russia to make representations on behalf of that church and all connected with it. The Muscovite policy turned permissions into rights, a particular case into a general rule, and claimed a protectorate over all members of the Greek Church. In the second volume of the Life of the Prince Consort — a work which is a repertory of political in- formation of the highest instructiveness at the present time — we read how the Emperor Nicholas addressed an autograph letter to Queen Victoria respecting his claims, and how Her Majesty replied that having studied the treaty she cciuld not reconcile its language with his claims. Before many years another war broke out. This was be- tween Catharine the Second and Selim the Third, terminating in the treaty of Jassy. The design of Russia, in conjunction with Austria, was nothing less than the partition of Turkey after the fashion of the partition of Poland. This war is rendered for ever infamous by the frightful massacres of the Russian Suwarrow. Montesquieu's observation was verified, and by the interposition of the Western Cabinets — and by that only — the projected partition was frustrated. Nevertheless the Porte recognized the Russian title to the Crimea, and the frontier was removed from the Boug to the Dneister. Twenty years later the Russian frontier was again advanced, being shifted from the Dneister to the Pruth. The occasion of the war had been the Protectorate claimed bj' Alexander INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. Xiu the First over all subjects of the Porte professing the Greek religion. At the Treaty of Tilsit, Napoleon had agreed that Alexander might take any port of Turkey except Constanti- nople. " Constantinople never," muttered Napoleon ; " it is the empire of the vporld." In M. Lanfrey's Memoir of Napo- leon, which so completely destroys the lying Napoleonic legend, there is a very clear account of these transactions. The whole of Bessarabia, with the principal mouth of the Danube, was added to Eussia. This is known as the Treaty of Bucharest. In 1826, the Treaty of Akkerman, between Nicholas, just come to the throne, and Mahmoud II., took place. This Treaty, peculiarly insulting to Turkey, was supposed to explain and ratify the Treaty of Bucharest. The Porte was to indemnify Russian merchants for the depredations of the Barbary Corsairs. Servia held an important place in this Treaty, many stipulations being made in support of her guaranteed independence. 1829. Treaty of Adrianople. — The war with E,ussia,between the Emperor Nicholas and Mahmoud II., had commenced in part as a natural result of the battle of Navarino. This treaty is of a very memorable and glorious character to Russia. Her army occupied Adrianople, and its advanced guard threatened Constantinople. A secret convention had been made by the Governments of Prince Metternich and the Duke of Wellington to prevent the total conquest of Turkey. A heavy indemnity, amounting to £5,000,000, was to be paid to Russia. Wallachia and Moldavia were nominally restored to the Sublime Porte, but by a separate convention they were made independent Principalities. All conquests in Asia Minor were restored, with the exception of five fortresses, with contiguous territory, which constituted a most important acquisition for Russia. All former conventions relative to Servia were fully ratified. The passage of the Dardanelles was left open to Russia, and she was to have undisturbed navigation of the Black Sea. All articles in the Treaty of Akkerman relating to Servia XIV INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. were to be carried into immediate effect. The resources of Turkey had never been at a lower point than during this war, yet the result of the conflict was long doubtful, and the Rus- sians lost 150,000 men in the invasion. If the Turks had pos- sessed ample information the Russian army might have been exterminated. By the tenth article Turkey became a party to that Treaty of London between Russia, England, and France Avhich had led to the battle of Navarino. The result was the erection of Greece into a separate kingdom. The year 1833 witnessed the Treaty of Unkiar-Skelessi. After Ibrahim's victory at Konieh the Porte applied to England for assistance against the revolt of Mehemet Ali. The Liberal Reform Government of the day answered that they had not at that moment the means of affording the assistance required. The Porte then applied to its inveterate enemy, Russia, which eagerly accepted an exclusive protectorate. The autograph letter requesting help is preserved in the Russian Imperial archives. In reward for the services of Russia two treaties of Unkiar-Skelessi, the one public, the other private, were exe- cuted. By the first an offensive and defensive alliance was made between Russia and Turkey, and by the secret articles the Ottoman Porte was, at the request of the Russian Em- peror, to close the Straits of the Dardanelles against the armed vessels of all foreign Powers. It is sometimes called the Treaty of the St-aits. In 1840 (July 15th), a treaty or convention was made between Turkey and four of the great European Powers, England, Russia, Austria, and Prussia — France being excluded. The result was that after the Syrian war, the object contem- plated by the convention was achieved, Mehemet Ali being compelled to relinquish all the provinces held by him except the hereditary Pacbalic of Egypt. The exclusion or absence of France from that Treaty nearly led to a rupture with England. This led after a good deal of heartburning, to the Treaty of London, 1841, between the same powers, with the addition of INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. xv France. This treaty was supplementary to that of the pre- cediug year, and defined the rights of Turkey and foreign nations to the navigation of the Bosphorus and the Darda- nelles. These waters were closed to all foreign vessels of war while Turkey was at peace. After the Treaty of Adrianople in 1829, nothing for an un- precedented number of years of a directly hostile character occurred between Turkey and Russia. The Treaty of TJnkiar- Skelessi, though it interfered materially with the public law of Europe, and veiled aims hostile to Turkey, was nominally one of amity with her, according to the ironic and unnatural fashion of the treaty of San Stefano. But the vision of the possession of Constantinople has ever dazzled the mind of Muscovite rulers, and has been the loadstar of their aspirations. War after war, eventuating in peace after peace, has never practically brought her nearei: to this accomplishment of her object. It may be laid down as an historical law that within an almost calculable number of years Russia, with dogged perseverance, will renew her efforts. The first opening for a renewed struggle was occa- sioned by a dispute respecting the so-called " Holy Places " at Jerusalem, involving points of privilege and precedence, in respect to the chapels and sanctuaries of the city. France pra.ctically claimed the protectorate of all Roman Catholics in the East, and the Czar, in his assumed position of the Head of the Greek Church — a position, however, which has never been defined or conceded — claimed the protectorate of the Greek Christians. It is obvious that Turkey had no interest in the quarrel between the Greek and Latin Churches except in pre- serving the peace and doing equal justice to both. The quarrel between France and Russia, mainly through the moderation and good sense of the French Ministry, was satisfactorily ad- justed. But the wolf always finds a pretext for accusing the innocent of disturbing the stream. The dream of the possession of Con- stantinople at least entirely disturbed the Czar Nicholas's XVI INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. balance of mind, and destroyed the high personal reputation which he had earned among the sovereigns of Europe. He de- manded an exclusive protectorate over all the Christian subjects of the Porte. This would have created an imperiuminimperio in the Sultan's European dominions. On the Sultan refusing to sign a treaty conceding this tremendous demand, Russian, troops occupied the Danubian Principalities, which they after- wards evacuated, in the well-founded apprehension that Austria might join in the war, and allowed Austria's neutral army to occupy them. The opportune death of the Czar Nicholas removed the main obstacle to peace. Through the exertions of Count Beust, the Austrian Minister, five propositions were sub- mitted to Russia, and accepted by her as the basis of a pacifica- tion. Paris was selected as the place of Conference, and even- tually on Sunday, March 30th, 1856, a treaty based on these propositions was signed. The signatures were those of the Plenipotentiaries of Austria, England, France, Prussia, Russia, Sardinia and Turkey. The treaty itself consists of some thirty clauses. Its provisions entirely abrogated the monstrous claim of a sovereignty over the subjects of the Porte belonging to the Communion of the Greek Church. It abrogated the Czar's protectorate of the Danubian Principalities, and substituted that of the Six Powers. Russia consented to a rectific^ation of her frontier, and the southern part of Bessarabia was assigned to Moldavia. The free navigation of the mouths of the Danube was provided for. Both Russia and Turkey were prohibited from having fleets in the Black Sea. The effect of this was that Turkey might have her own fleet in southern waters out- side the Dardanelles, but the Russian southern seaboard was left without a fleet. The war crippled, or rather destroyed, the power of Russia in the Crimea, and her prestige became immensely impaired. A daring violation of this treaty, which now constituted perhaps the most important part of the public law of Europe, was made by Russia seven years ago with a. merely selfish object. INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. xvu The neutralisation of the Black Sea had been one of the princi- pal objects contemplated in entering upon the Crimean War. When our French allies contemplated the relinquishment of that object, Lord Palmerston declared 'that England would rather be left to carry on war alone than abandon her demand. By the Treaty of Paris it became part of the law of nations that the Euxine was open to ships of commerce and closed to ships of war. In 1871, the greatest sensation was caused in all the courts and exchanges of Europe by the announce- ment that the Russian Government had given notice that they would no longer be bound by the terms of the Treaty of Paris which prohibited a war fleet in the Black Sea. For a time the question of peace or war seemed trembling in the balance. But the Russian Government was not dealing with Lord Palmerston, but with Mr Gladstone, a fact of which it was perfectly aware, and on which it had doubtless based its calculations. Turkey vehemently protested against this arbi- trary and high-handed infraction of the Treaty, but it found no support from England and the other signatory powers. A Con- vention was summoned, and eventually this most important requirement of the Peace of 1856 was relinquished, thus laying the foundation for indefinite further demands in respect to the Greek Church subjects of the Porte. This rapid survey of the diplomatic victories which have succeeded the material victories of Russia will enable us to understand the contemporary condition of things. Russia is uniformly true to her traditions. We are able to predict with some certainty the corrupt and sinister course, which Russia in parallel circumstances is sure to pursue. The latest as well as the Stefano treaty^ is characterized by all the marks 1 The Black Mail habitually le-ried by Eussia has now assumed gigantic proportions. No one blamed Germany for exacting the war fine from the aggressor Prance. But the folly of the Allies in 1856 in remitting Eussia'a war fine is now mockingly exhibited. Eussia prostrate paid nothing. Eussia a successful aggressor now proves herself a veritable Shylook : the pound of flesh is a bond for £35,0p0,000 to be used at discretion against the Turk, and it is to be hoped with_a similar result in the Shakesperian sense. xviii INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. which are shown by the general course and current of Russian diplomacy. The tortuous and secret element has not been wanting. The terms of the peace were doubtless formulated many weeks before they were made known. Terms so disastrous, so ruinous to the integrity of the Ottoman cau only be explained by the incapacity of Suleiman Pasha, the purchased connivance of other generals, and the reckless audacity of Gourko and Radetsky. The finesse and trickery which we only meet in our own country in the offices of the lowest pettifoggers, have been found in the chancellerie of St Petersburg. The whole course of Russian diplomatic history might have prepared us for duplicity, a duplicity which, historically speaking, is never dispelled except by the certitude of warlike antagonism. Russia has always had a passion for secret clauses in her treaties. She has always sworn faithful friendship with Turkey after inflicting a deadly wound. These conditions are now dragged into the light, and the great question will remain whether Russia may impose whatever conditions she can wrest from a prostrate foe, or whether these must be harmonized with the public law of Europe and the separate interests of the signatory powers. She has, indeed, approached nearer to Constantinople than has ever been the case in her ante- cedent history, but we believe the great historical law which we have noted will hold good, that Stamboul will evade her grasp, and when it seems within her power, mirage-like will again and again retire into the despairing distance. F. A. CHAPTER I. ANTIQUITY Oi" THE RUSSIANS. That vast part of Europe, and of Asia, known to-day under the name of Russia, was peopled from all antiquity in its tem- perate climate; but its savage people, plunged in the thick darkness of a profound ignorance, signalized their existence by no precise historical monuments. We may except some of the tombs inscribed with ancient Hebrew, written by individuals of the dispersed Jews. But the history of Russia commences really with the sons of Japheth. Eosh' was one of his descend- ants. And from the earliest times of profane history this name has been preserved. Perhaps above a thousand years before our era, the entrance into the Bosphorus and the terrors of the Black Sea, so called from its storms, had been explored by the Argonauts, and sung by Orpheus. In that song already the name of the Caucasus appeared : the Palus Mceotides or Sea of Azof, the Caspian and the Cimmerian Taurus, with its ever- lasting clouds and impenetrable mists, where it was said the sun never shone, and profound night reigned supreme. Cimmerian (or Crimean) darkness had passed into a pro- verb. Yet the Homeric genius peopled this country with in- habitants who lived only on the dew and the sweet juices of flowers ! where passion and tempests were unknown, and where they passed their innocent lives in the joys of a sweet repose, and who, when too old to enjoy the^e delights, precipitated themselves into the waves. But 500 B.C. the Greeks began to colonize the coasts of the Black Sea, built a city at the mouth ' See note at end of chapter. E. 1 2 ANTIQUITY OF THE RUSSIANS. of the Dnieper, called the "Happy," where, in the reign of Trajan, its inhabitants still delighted in the writings of Plato, knew the Iliad by heart, and sang the verses of Homer in their battles. A hundred years before Cyrus they were driven from their country by the Scythians, who themselves were forced by invaders from the East to the banks of the Danube and the Don. There they resisted the forces of Darius. These Scythians were Kirghiz and Calmucks, whose chief glory was their liberty, and their only science to harass an enemy, or to avoid him adroitly. But yet they permitted Greek colonists, and from them th«y were impregnated with the first seeds of civilization. Then there came a race formed of the mingled blood of the astute Greek and the savage Scythian, who began to cultivate corn-fields and commerce. So that, at the same time, the Scy- thians were both nomadic and agricultural. And not far from the mouth of the Dnieper, the tombs of their kings have been discovered. During the age when Herodotus wrote, he de- scribed two races, the Androphages and Melanchlenes, who lived near each other about 600 miles to the north of the Black Sea : and said that these peoples lived on human flesh ; and that in the winter they always covered themselves with the skins of wolves : that the Scythians were part of the Royal Horde ; and beyond the stony mountains (the Ural) a people with flattened noses surprised the caravans of merchants from the Black Sea. The fable of dragons or griffins guarding the golden trea- sures doubtless referred to the hideous Calmucks who pro- tected the mines of Siberia. Herodotus tells us also that these barbarians lavished gold upon their helmets and girdles, harness and horses ; but that they had only weapons of copper, and no silver ; that the Rus- sian Scythian inhabited immense plains, unwooded, and that the air was filled with light feathers (snow-flakes). He men- tions also the Dnieper, the Bug, the Don, and the Dniester, as well as the Pruth (under their Greek names) ; he also tells us that, in general, Scythia is renowned for its immense navigable rivers, abounding with fish, and bordered by prairies — rivers exceeding the Nile in extent. He also relates that the Greeks called the whole of Russia in Europe and Asia, Scythia, i. e. all ANTIQUITY OF THE RUSSIANS. 3 the Northern countries; just as they did the Southern, Ethiopia; the whole of the West, Celtic ; and the East, India. Their manners were peculiar. "They drank the blood of their enemies, tanned their skins for clothing, used their skulls as drinking bowls, and under the form of a glaive or sword they adored the god of war." At last the mixed people of Ancient Russia and the sur- rounding hordes took the name of Sarmatians in the first cen- tury, and these inhabited the whole region from Germany to the Caspian Sea, and from the Black to the White Sea. The Romans, after a few centuries, no longer blushed to purchase of the Sarmatians, with gold, their friendly alliance. It was these people who gave the fatal signal for establishing barbarism on the ruins of Roman civilization. Russia for many ages was the battle-field of swarming nations, wave after wave inundating and devastating its lands ; the Goths, Vandals, Huns, or Tartars, each worse than its predecessor. During all these long ages of bloodshed and victory, the original people, " Slaves" by descent, were, more or less, mingled with their various conquerors. But they kept one pure distinction. All these fought against them mounted, carried their families on carts, and lived in tents : whilst the Slaves fought on foot, built wooden houses, and were renowned for fleetness of foot. It is not surprising that, under these successive wars and rivers stained with blood, Southern Russia became one vast desert, offering but a sad and miserable spectacle of ruin and depopulation. The Sarmatians lost their name, confused with the leavings of so many invading hordes. The Bulgarians, having their city destroyed, migrated from the East of the Volga and the Ural mountains, to seek refuge on the Southern banks of the Danube. These people, called Ougres, hitherto unknown to the Greeks, in 474, began to threaten Constantinople itself. But even then the Slaves were still preserved, and they appear on the stage of history with 4clat. They tested their valour under Attila. The grand and patient spirit of the Slaves, when habituated to war, is seen in the answer of Lauritas, one of their chiefs, to Baian, the Khan of the conquering Avars : " Who can ravish our liberty? We are accustomed to conquer countries, and not 1—2 4 ANTIQUITY OF THE RUSSIANS. to cede our own to enemies. Such will be our thought so long as swords and brave men exist upon the earth." But in the end they were compelled to furnish an army, and the Khan sacrificed them ruthlessly as "forlorn hopes" in his audacious siege of Constantinople in 626. This Baiian, however, demanded fresh troops from the Northern Slaves. Their ambassadors returned carrying harps and lutes, declaring they had been five months on the journey. They asserted that in their northern country iron was unknown, they were ignorant of the art of war, and were only impassioned with the love of music, and that they led a life of peace and tranquillity. He admired their high stature, the sweetness of their manners and the strength of their bodies, treated them with kind hospitality, furnished them with means of returning home in safety, and accepted their excuses, as dwelling at too immense a distance to prove effectual allies. Historians agree that in the far North these Slaves dwelt happily on the shores of the Baltic, protected from the barbaric horrors of successive desolations bursting from the Eastern Tartar steppes. Novgorod, it is said, was built before the Christian era by the Slaves, and Kieif also. Subsequently they built Izborsk, Polotsk, Smolensk, Lubisch, and TchernigofP. The Fins, more ancient still than the Slaves, had abandoned all to their con- querors — in Sweden and Norway to the Goths, and in Russia to the Slaves. " Never seeking safety," says Tacitus, " except in misery; they possess neither horses, arms, nor houses; they feed on herbs, clothe themselves with skins, and protect themselves from the air under the interlaced branches of trees." Before the time of Rurik, the Russian peoples lived separated, with no bond of union, and were totally unable to make great con- quests, or ensure internal peace, among so many rival com- munities. But while no impression had been made in Russia or Scy- thia, New Bulgaria, as it might with propriety have been called, began to feel the benign influence of the Christian religion. Formosus went into Bulgaria as a legate from Pope Nicholas, in order to complete the christianization of the people, and to correct the errors learned from their first teachers. ANTIQUITY OF THE RUSSIANS. 5 The Dame of the Bulgarians, a race, next to the Huns, the most terrible and most hateful to the invaded Europeans, was known in the West as early as the reign of Theodoric the Ostrogoth. They had dwelt in Asia on the shores of the Volga or Boulgar, and either gave that river their name or derived it from the river. The Teutonic tribes had gradually yielded to the Christian yoke. The fierce Northmen pouring from the havens and lakes of the Baltic regions, fully though rudely armed in their piratical vessels, alone resisted their sway. For three centuries scarcely any impression had been made either on the Bulgarians of the Volga or on the "Sclaves of Russia." A national calamity, a zealous monk and pious princess, opened the gates of this heathen land. New Bulgaria, near the Danube, had a king Bagoris whose sister had fallen in childhood into the hands of the Greek Emperor. Two monks, Cyril and Methodius, together with the restored princess, united to convert the people. Methodius skil- fully painted the torments of the damned. Bagoris was horror- struck and was converted. His subjects refused to follow his example. He was baptized by night. The rebels preferred their national gods, surrounded the palace and prepared a new king. Bagoris with the Cross painted on his breast and a few attendants issued forth unarmed to meet them. This sight, so full of kingly courage, struck the rebels with panic. All fled. The king, notwithstanding his conversion, put to death all the rebellious nobles, not even sparing infants. Cyril (Constantino), an erudite scholar, learned in Greek, Latin, Scla- vonian, Armenian and the Khazavian languages, invented their alphabet and translated for the Bulgarian the Scriptures into Sclavonian. Cyril had spent a long time on the north shore of the Euxine, bent on the conversion of the Khazars : and for the same purpose passed into Moravia. The king of Bulgaria sent 106 questions on discipline, ceremony and manners to the Pope, who replied with great prudence. Instead of enchant- ments and auguries and having fortunate days they were to make votive offerings in the churches, and they were not to put to death soldiers, before battle, for neglect of their arms or horses. 6 ANTIQUITY OF THE RUSSIANS. The Bulgarian king ate alone. Not even his wife was allowed to sit down in his presence. The warriors took an oath upon their naked swords driven into the ground : and in many parts this weapon was worshipped. The great Russian historian' eloquently declares that '' not- withstanding the enlightened careers of Rome and Greece, the history of Russia yields in interest neither in its facts, por- traits, or progress, to those of these polished ancients." " Such are the exploits of Sviatoslaf, the horrible invasion of Bati, the dash and audacity of Dmitri, the fall of Novgorod, the taking of Kasan, the triumph of civic virtues during the inter- regnum, the shades of Oleg and the son of Igor, floating majestically across the veil which covers the cradle of Russia, the valiant Nitislaf as horrible in combat as he was condescend- ing in peace, the brave yet unfortunate Nevsky, — ^that the lightest touches and the least trait of these grand characters ought to fill both the heart and the imagination with emotion. The reign of Ivan III. is a treasure of history. I know not a sovereign more worthy of being placed at the pinnacle of the Temple of Memory. The rays of his glory illumi- nate the cradle of Peter the Great. Between these two monarchs appears Ivan IV. called the TERRIBLE; Godounof equally meriting his good and bad fortune ; the false Dimitri, that extraordinary man ; all followed by a phalanx of intrepid patriots ; the wise Alexis, the father of that Emperor to whom Europe has given the name of ' the Great.' It would seem as though all modem history should remain unspoken, if that of Russia is not worthy to fix the general attention of the world." "I come to my labours. I abstain from nothing and I invent nothing. I have sought my expressions in my spirit, and historic monuments have alone inspired my thoughts. I have sought the soul and the life of these histories in the dust of the old chronicles." The significant history of this mighty people from the cradle to the throne of All the Russias, reveals the genius, spirit and temper of the nation, presented to us after so many > Earamsin. ANTIQUITY OF THE RUSSIANS. 7 ages of enterprise, confusion, conquests and disasters ; the contemplation of such a people, so indomitable, so superior to the accidents of climate and the catastrophes of invasion, can- not but shed a brilliant light upon its possible future. Ka- ramsin's work of eleven volumes, translated into French under his' special supervision, is full of thrilling interest, and if this brochure only succeeds in drawing attention to this immortal work, a great object will be fulfilled. The translators^ thus speak of this author (page viii.). "A man has appeared, who, endowed by nature with an ardent spirit, a brilliant imagination, modified by profound studies and experience, has plunged into his career, and has placed himself in the first rank of the most celebrated historians. He has consecrated fourteen years of his life to searching the old chronicles and national archives for the proof of the glorious antiquity of his country. Indeed the distinguished approval of his sovereign, the just appreciator of true talent, as well as the enthusiasm with which the whole Russian nation has received his work, have been the recompense for his labours." Karamsin has quoted many authors, but his chief ancient authority is Nestor, sumamed the Father of Russian history, who lived in the tenth century at the monastery of Petchersky : who visited ancient temples, searched Byzantine chronicles, and conversed with the old men of Kieff, travellers and other natives of aU parts of Russia, as well as consulted the registers preserved in the churches. His next is Basile, of the end of the eleventh century. The different classes of his authors are arranged under seven heads. It seemed more convenient to compress the progress of Russia into as small a compass as possible for reference, and to add a few notes explanatory of some of the allusions in the text at the end of each chapter. The matter contained in Karamsin's grand history, as well as that in the numerous other works consulted, is so profuse, that the task of striking out a new path, amid such a forest of antiquity, for English readers, is one of some difficulty ; the chief object kept in 1 MM. St Thomas et Jauflret, Histoire de I'Empire de Bussie, par M. Karamsin. Paris, 1819. 8 ANTIQUITY OF TEE RUSSIANS. view having been to display the genius of Russia for enter- prise, success, and permanent occupation. To fully comprehend the Russians one ought really to be a Russ. But a perfect despotism, such as that inaugurated by the great Peter, is so complete, thorough and penetrating, that it requires a great mental effort to grasp the idea in all its mystery : for mystery it must ever be to the free, where life, person and property are sacred. The following, translated from a foreign writer, well explains this point. " It is always requisite to go back to Peter in order to under- stand Russia as it is. He discovered that the chiefs of his people were too independent, and too full of their own thoughts, to be apt ministers of his will. To remedy this, though endued with an active and sagacious mind, yet too narrow to appreciate the advantages of liberty, he imagined nothing could so well answer his purpose as being a grand master of arbitrary power, and a complete restraint which should succeed in dividing his various subjects so as to sever them entirely from the in- dependence conferred by illustrious birth, rank or talent. He designed that the heir of the highest should serve in the lowest ranks, and that the son of the sod should be elevated by a nod to the highest distinctions. By this, every one entirely depended upon the smile of the Emperor. Each was elevated by the favour of his prince. Behold how Russia became a regiment of seventy million men: and this is the work of Peter the Great ! He freed in one day the fetters of ages; in the eager desire to regenerate his people, he reckoned nature, history, chaxacter and life as an old song. He perceived with a rare sagacity, better than, any predecessor, that whilst independent nobility subsisted, the despotism of a single man was only a fiction : he formed a new caricature of true nobility by transforming them into the creatures of his hand. But the true spirit and genius of this founder of the modern Russian Empire is best illustrated by his own military code. "The Christian soldier ought to be always ready to appear before God, without which he would not have the security necessary for the continual sacrifice which his country demands of him. ANTIQUITY OF THE BUSSIANS. 9 "All the estate lies ia the Emperor; all must be done by him, absolute and despotic master, and he ought to give an account to God only. That is why every word injurious to his person, every judgment hostile to his actions or intentions, ought to be punished with death." NOTE. The earliest mention of the name Eosh (0 being long as in host) is in Genesis xlvi. 21. He is there mentioned with Muppim, Huppim and Ard. He is next mentioned in connection with Tobl and Mosk, but only in a subordinate sense: "The laud of Magog and the chief ruler of Eosh, Mosk and Tobl." Bosh is in this passage a part of a general kingdom, including also Mosk and Tobl. The Eussians have favourite terminations in "ki, ski and ow," and it is not difficult to recognize these words in "Eussia," "Moscow," and " Tobolsk." By a singular oversight, the English, French, German and Latin translators have, we find by comparison, entirely omitted the word Eosh (Ezek. xxxviii. 2), though found in the Hebrew and Septuagint (Greek) originals, both which pre- serve the name in Genesis xlvi. 21. Taking the name Mosk, it is a striking fact that the national and indigenous perfume of Eussia has long been known by the same consonants m, B,k (musk) ; but even in the time of Herodotus these nations were mentioned as the Moskoi and Tibarenoi. The Moschi were a barbarous people, inhabiting the Mosohian mountains between Iberia, Armenia and Colchis (Caucasus), the eastern part of the Black Sea. The Koran also gives the same name Ewsh. The original meaning of the word msk is the scattering abroad of seed ; and certainly the Moskowites have preeminently exemplified the radical signification of this interesting word. It should be remembered that the original Hebrew gave only these consonant letters. The learned, full 0, thousand years after they were given in Ezekiel, laboured to recover the lost pronunciation, and inserted the vowels e, e (MeSHeCH). It was somewhat uncertain whether the SH here given was the soft S or the stronger SH, in which case it might have been, as stated, MSK. In the Samaritan copy of the Scriptures this word is spelt two ways, MosoK and Mosk ; whilst the Greek and Latin Vulgate give it Mosok and Mosoch re- spectively. It may.be interesting to compare these verses containing Magog and Gog by ctuoting the translations : English Version. "Gog, the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal." Hebrew and Greek Versions. " Gog, of the land of Magog, chief ruler of Eosh, Meshek and Tobl." (Hebrew.) "Gog and the land of Magog, the chief ruler of Kosh, Mesakh and Thobel." (Greek.) Now of this Magog the Ma denotes the place, so that Magog means really the place of Gog. Magog was the son of Japheth. " It is also the name of a lO ANTIQUITY OF THE RUSSIANS. region, and a great and powerful people of the same name, inhabiting the extreme recesses of the North." "We are,'' says Gesenius, " to understand just the same nations as the Greets comprised under the Scythians (Josephus), which term was a general description of the nomadic tribes of the North of Europe beyond the Black Sea." Horace particularly mentions them, as also do PUny and Cicero, as Scythians. On the whole, therefore, Gog appears to be a generic term, and to denote the chief ruler of the whole of the northern nations east and north of the Black Sea. The Bomans appear to have had no other name for these nations than Scythians. In the Crimea, however, they were known as Taurians, who sacri- ficed what foreigners they could get hold of to their goddess Diana, as well aa calves and bulls. An able writer identifies the Eussians with the descendants of the Assyrians, and the Turks with those of the Medes. The learned MicHevicz, in his lectures at the University of Paris, has endeavoured to prove this point. A curious item of his illustrations is the adoration of a " human God." It appears that the name Nebuchadnezzar is nothing more than the Bussiau phrase ' ' There is no God but the Czar." Layard, Botta, Eawlinson, Hincks, and others, have, to their infinite surprise, discovered the TwkiBh language in the monuments of ancient times. CHAPTER II. THE RUS&IANS FROM RURIK (862) DOWN TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL (1855). THE^igantic form of "Russia rising from a little Duchy (named Muscovy), and creating for itself a South Eussia, a West Russia, a Great Russia, and in the East a New Russia, extending through thirty degrees of latitude, and one hundred and forty of longitude, fills the mind with astonishment. This Empire, thus huge in its awful dimensions, seems to overshadow with its broad expanse the puny remnant of Western Europe. Still more amazing is the rapidity of its growth. Combining with a subtle diplomacy, unlimited religious pre- tensions, a restless policy of encroachment, and uniting with all these a fanaticism which, of all other influences, has in all ages most despotically swayed the human spirit, the genius of Russia has started up from the prostration following the fall of Sebastopol like the fabled Phoenix resuscitated from its ashes. To trace the gradual development in detail of this stem and unyielding Asiatic power, rarely known to give back the prey once seized, would far exceed the present scope of this short account. In order, however, to give, cursorily, an insight into the Tartar influences, so wonderfully welded into the body politic, and so keenly directing the cruel sufferings to which the Rus- sians have been schooled by the iron grasp of relentless and almost ever-returning tormentors, the Mongolian. Calmucks, 12 THE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 862, more like demons than men ; — it is necessary to glance briefly at the various leaders, chieftains, dukes, Tartar khans, princes, and emperors, who have combined to generate the spirit, and make up the sum total of modern Russian political life. This blending of Asiatic power and barbaric taste is truthfully displaiyed in the very pinnacles and architecture of the ancient capital of the nation. At this early epoch of Russian development, several traits, peculiarly characteristic of the age, are highly interesting. In war the rights of the sovereign were limited by those of the soldiers. He could only take a certain part of booty. Russia lay entirely at the mercy of piratical adventurers from the shores of the Baltic. They divided the towns and villages at will among themselves. The people of the soil had simply to submit, and the new rulers everywhere took the name of princes, who soon after their arrival introduced the Scandinavian usages and laws ; some of which were, that the father had a right to kill the murderer of his son, and that every one might kill a robber. These foreign leaders also introduced the art of war, standards and battalions, cavalry, vanguards, and taught the Russians how to seize towns, and to entrench themselves against an enemy; taught also navigation, so that the Greek fire alone saved' Constantinople from the attack of Igor. The guard of Igor after his death took his name. In the ninth century the Northmen, true pirates by trade, warriors and conijuerors by the right of the strong arm and the daring soul, were ravaging nearly all Europe. Ascending the rapid Rhone, infesting even the Alps, spoiling even Saracen Sicily and disturbing even Charlemagne himself, overrunning the Mediterranean and disputing with the Saracens, the same audacious race equally ravaged the Northern seas ; nothing was secure, even in the heart of a country. They seemed to defy, in their ill-formed barks, the wildest weather, the most " dangerous shores, and the swiftest rivers. Their black sails flapped on every river. In Spain the worshippers of Odin encountered the followers of Mahommed. But these wild Arabs of the sea had no union. Castles or churches, bishops or counts, equally shared the fate of the cloister and the farm. DOWN TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 1 3 The churchmen thought these Northmen were God's instrument to puQish the sins of the people, and gladly paid whatever black mail they chose to extort. Paris, even Paris fell, after its famous siege hy these daring spirits, in 885. The followers of RoUo became Frenchmen, and ceased to be vulgar pagans. At this epoch too, Novgorod was the great emporium of trade, where the natives of the Baltic shores came to buy rich stuffs, and to exchange the wares of their piracies. In spring- time also the Norwegian races assembled there to purchase slaves and rich furs, which they carried back in the autumn. Novgorod at this time received an immense number of carts loaded with honey and fiirs : then, the revenue of the prince. The Russians practised piracy equally with trading. Iron chains fixed near Stockholm (then Stockzund) were insufiScient to bar their visits*. But the Greeks exacted from the Russians a treaty, in which it was stated, that no Russian should be allowed to trade unfurnished with a signed paper, attesting his pacific intentions. " The reason of this was, that many Russians, under the pre- text of commerce, exercised their brigandage upon the Black Sea. They perceived then the necessity of distinguishing a corsair from a true merchant." But thus early the Russians displayed a grand facility for imitating Greek luxury. Each prince modelled his court after Eastern magnificence ; their wives, and even their children, had each their own court and suite, and occasionally they demanded from the emperor royal robes and crowns, which it was asserted were the handiwork of angels. They even dined off silver dishes, and hydromel was the very soul of their entertainment, notwithstanding at Kieff they already drank the wines of Greece, where the fashion of purple and rich dressing, borrowed from the Grecian court, had been established. During the first century of Russian aggression, the ter- ritory had been spread to a much greater extent than that of any other European power. Starting from Novgorod, the Normans, having been invited by its helpless inhabitants totally ' Bayer, Gomment, de VAcad. t. x. p. 406. 14 THE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 862, unable to rule themselves or others, soon pressed their con- quests north, east, south and west. These daring bands of adventurers, a brotherhood" in arms, as they were much more civilized and educated than the barbarian Sclavs of the North, partook in all the sports of war, became chief functionaries, officers, ministers, and the most distinguished citizens of the infant kingdom, and formed the guard of the Prince and the grand Council of the State, without whom neither war nor alliance was decided upon. Even Igor could not make a treaty with the Greek Emperor without the sanction of this guard of boyards, all of whom swore fealty on the sacred hill. The general bulk of the Eussian population, the base of which was Sclave, were the obedient slaves of these haughty Varangians, who in their weakness, ignorance, and simplicity, found them- selves totally unable to guide the destinies of the country, or control its incessant internal quarrels. Two years after his brothers died, Rurik united the several principalities into one, and thus founded the Russian monarchy under a feudal systenl. For nothing but the sword of the victor could control the passions or extort the obedience of the slavedom of the country. Feuds however soon arose among the Normans; Ascold and Dir, offended with Rurik, betook themselves to the great southern districts and were accompanied by many of their adventurous race. They had little difficulty in subduing the feeble Slaves of the south, and soon established themselves at Kieff on the Dnieper. Trained in the northern seas, these men, brave and skilful, now took the name of Russians ; and their warlike fame soon reached the ears of the Greek Ruler at the Bosphorus, against whom they had the conspicuous audacity to declare themselves as "enemies of the Greeks." Michael III., the Nero of his time, was absent. But he re- turned in haste, and for the first time found his citizens groan- ing with the very name of a Russian on their lips (Rios or Roos), whom the people called Scythians, descended as they thought from the fabulous mount Taurus, and the conquerors of so many neighbouring nations. Two hundred Russian boats ap- proached. In consternation, the patriarch Photius seized the DOWN TO -THE FALL OF SEBASTOFOL, 1855. 15 robe of the holy virgin, guarded in the church of Blachern, and pUmged it in the waves of the Bosphorus to arrest the hostile fleet. A miracle appeared. A mighty tempest arose. The fleet was scattered and Byzantium was this time saved'. The miserable remnant of the Eussian fleet returned to Kieff. Brief History of Russian Development, from its Cradle to the Throne of All the Russias. EURIK. 862. The Sclaves^ of Novgorod send for rulers to govern their country, reduced to anarchy, from Scandinavia. Rurik and two brothers desert their country to settle in North Russia. These brothers bring a band of comrades called Varan- gians or Normans. Rurik leaves a son (1) Igor, four years old. Oleg is regent till 912. Oleg was remarkable for the audacious stratagem by which he annexed Kieff. Taking the young Igor in his arms and a trusty band of armed adherents, concealed in his boats, they descended the Dnieper, under the guise of friends wishing to visit their kinsmen in the south. Arrived at the rendezvous, the unsuspecting chieftains of Kieff, thus entrapped with true Muscovite guile, were suddenly surrounded with armed men. '' You," exclaimed Oleg, " are neither Princes nor a race of Princes. I am a Prince and this is Igor, the son of Rurik." At a signal instantly these friendly chiefs were slain on the spot. The inhabitants, totally taken by surprise and paralysed with consternation, threw open their gates to these treacherous visitors. Kieff was thus occupied. Oleg next attempted Con- stantinople with 80,000 men conveyed in boats along the coast 1 Karamsin, vol. I. p. 147. ' Kaeamsin, p. 339, vol. i. The Sclaves reached to the Baltic Sea and lived in the neighbourhood of the Goths and Germans; one may give them the name either of Sarmatians or of Scythians. Gibbon says that towards the sixth century the Sclaves possessed 1600 villages In Russia and Poland. But - these people were then called slaves, true serfs or slaves of the rulers as it is supposed by some; this hardly seems probable, as Procope mentions that in each of their invasions in Dalmatia the Slaves killed or made prisoners 200,000 men. Still we think they might have fought extremely well as slaves or serfs under able commanders. 1 6 THE RUSSIAXS FROM RURIK, 862, of the Black Sea ; but a chain forbad their entrance. Landing, they intimidated Leo, extorted not only huge treasure, but a treaty, the first Russian treaty on record. (2.) 913. Igor mounted the throne. A second expedition with a much more numerous army failed. The Greek fire used by the defenders this time preserved the city. When advanced in years the insatiable rapacity of Igor's officers impelled him to try and extort increased tribute from the Drevlians. Succeeding in this, he sent a large part of his army home : the inhabitants fell upon the remainder and massacred Igor. The queen- mother Olga now became regent. At length the Drevlians sought peace and friendship. She ensnared and destroyed their deputations. She next invited all the chief men of their State, pretending to listen to overtures of marriage with their chief prince. Ignorant of the fate of their predecessors they com- pHed. These were also all put to death in secret. Next, pre- tending to accept the alliance, a great entertainment was proclaimed. All that came were also assassinated. Not yet gorged with blood, she next laid waste with fire and sword their country. One town, near which Igor had lost his life, resisted bravely. At length she promised mercy on condition of receiv- ing all the pigeons in the to-mi. To the tails of these birds she fixed lighted matches, which caused the birds to seek their native nests among the wooden roofs of the town, which were thus set on fire. The inhabitants were driven by the flames upon the swords of their enemies; none escaped. (3.) 969. SviATOSLOP. A true Russian hero. Wholly war- like and fired with a devouring ambition for conquest, he disdained no hardships; slept without tent, in the open air, wrapped in a bearskin. As the son of Igor, he was the first Russian prince. He lived entirely on horseflesh or savage animals ; roasted his own meat ; inured himself to every kind of hardship: his saddle was his pillow, and he became the idol of his army. He lived for conquest alone, and burning with a fiery ambition to shed a new lustre upon the Russian army flew with youthful impetuosity to the field of honour. But he never profited by surprises. With the haugljty pride of an ancient D0W2f TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 17 hero he ever annouticed by ambassage " I march against you." In the" time when barbarism spread over the whole Russian empire, he loved to comply with all the chivalrous rules of honour. He attacked and occupied (West) Bulgaria. John the new Greek Emperor sent ambassadors requiring him to evacuate. He refused, gathered an army of Bulgarians, Hungarians and others amounting to 300,000 men. But quite beaten by strata- gem, by the skill and valour of the Greeks, he was at length defeated and slain in his retreat on the Dnieper. Russia was now divided among his three sons, Yaropolk at Kieff, Vladimir in lSrovgorod,,and Oleg in the country of the Drevlians. Vladimir now made war on both his brothers. One was treacherously murdered, trusting in good faith to his plighted honour and hospitality. The other, Oleg, was slain in battle, not however unwept by Vladimir. Yaropolk had been betrayed by a par- tisan Blude. This man Vladimir also entertained, for three days loaded him with hospitalities, and then had him suddenly executed, Vladimir the pagan was signally devout: sacrificed prisoners to his gods and zealously embraced the Greek faith ; forswore his idols, and relinquished six wives and eight hundred concubines. Introducing the Greek form of worship, he adopted many Greek arts and even utilized the Greek alphabet. He prevailed upon the dwellers at Kieff also to be baptized. '"Dans ce grand jour,' dit Nestor, 'les cieux et la terre tressaillirent d'all^gresse:'" Vladimir was transported with ecstasy at the sight of so many Christians redeemed from idolatry. The altar of the true God replaced the pagodas of idols. In 983 he raised a church to the holy Virgin, built of stone by Greek architects. The new religion spread in Russia, but paganism still lingered. Vladimir enlightened his counlry : diffused a knowledge of the Bible, translated by Cyril and Methodius into the old Sclavonic language in the ninth century. This Grand Prince, after embracing Christianity, was inspired with an extraordinary tenderness and charity. He pardoned murderers, only imposing a fine. But at last, being remonstrated with by the pastors on account of the enormous increase of crime, he re-established capital punishment as it existed under Igor and Sviatoslof. During some years, a Norwegian prince R. 2 1^, 1 8 TSE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 862, Olof was sheltered at the Court of Vladimir, and later, by its aid, became King of Norway. But in his old age this great prince was overwhelmed with misery and grief through the ambition of his numerous sons, who forgot the most sacred bonds, armed brother against brother. One of them rebelled against his parent. Yaroslaf refused the accustomed tribute due at Novgorod to his father, transported a large army of Normans : Vladimir died on the march to give them battle. Prince Sviatopolk, an adopted nephew of Vladimir, divided his territories among his undutiful sons, exhorting them with his dying lips to live in peace and harmony. But the lust of loot and conquest again proved too strong for these fierce descendants. Intestine wars and commotions followed the race from generation to generation. Complete anarchy and con- fusion at length offered too tempting a bait to the voracious hordes outlying upon the eastern steppes. Kieff and Novgorod however had risen from this chaos of brotherly affection to become chief principalities, of which seventeen had been re- duced to seven. At last Vladimir II. arose chief of all, from these long-smouldering ruins \ "This prince," says our Russian historian, "whom the Church recognized as equal to the Apostles, has merited in history the name of ' Great.' It belongs to God alone and not to men, to know whether Vladimir was a real Christian from internal conviction, or whether he was not carried away with the ambition to become a relative and ally of a Greek Em- peror. This prince, from the time that he was imbued with the highest philanthropy, so lately the worshipper of idols, who loved to taste the cruelties of his vengeance and the vile delights of an abandoned life— this prince, who to crown his wickedness had dipped his hands in his brother's blood — trem- bled to shed that of criminals and the enemies of his country. His principal title to immortality is, without doubt, to have placed the Russian peojAe upon the path of the true religion." Karajvisin, Vol. I. p. 287. 1 Called Monomaque. His crown, called tlie Bonnet of Monomaqne, his gold chain, the imperial globe and sceptre, and other ancient ornaments, are still preserved in the Museum at Moscow, and used at coronations. DOWN TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 19 ["Yakut, in the 13tli century, gives an account, which is preserved in three public libraries, Copenhagen, Oxford, and St Petersburg, particularly descriptive of the ancient Russians and Khozars. 'The Russians are the neighbours of the Slavs and the Turcs ; they have a particular language and religion ; it is re- ported that their number is 100,000,000. They possess neither fields nor herds. The Slavs pillage them in their incursions ; every father puts a sword in the hands of his new-born son, saying, You have no other inheritance but this steel to conquer with. Are suitors discontented with the sentence pronounced by their king? then he says to them, "Ah, well, decide your quarrel by the sword, the victor is he whose sword has the best steel." This is written (a.d. 912 or 944). ' Akhmet, son of Fotzlan, being sent from Bagdad A.D. 922, under the reign of Igor, by the Kaliph Muktidir to the king of the Slavs, has left a description of all that he saw during his journey. I am going to communicate to the readers of these memoirs what I have read with astonishment. I have seen, said he, the Russian merchants in one of ^,he havens of the Volga ; their bodies are red, they wear neither coats nor vests ; the men throw on one side of their shoulders a thick garment, so that one of their arms remains free. Each one carries a hatchet, a long knife, and a very large sword of European make, without which they never stir. All the women carry, suspended to their bosom, a little case of iron, copper, silver, or gold, according to the richness of their husbands, to which is fastened a knife. They wear round the neck chains of gold or silver. A husband who owns 10,000 drachms, orders a wrought chain of gold for his wife, and for every other 10,000 drachms she is presented with another chain, so that the rich women carry many. 'Their principal ornaments consist of false green pearls; the husbands give a drachm for a necklace of this kind. The Russians are the most " mal apropos " of all people, they never wash themselves ! When they come from their country they cast anchor in the Volga, disembark and construct on the banks of the river large wooden houses, where they live ten or twenty 2—2 20 THE RUSSIANS FROM RVRIK, 862, together ; each has a large bench upon which he sits with his wife and the Slav which he wishes to sell. The author de- scribes their peculiar behaviour who come to buy the Slavs. 'Every morning a girl, brings to her master a vesselfull of water, in which he washes his person, hands, and hair, then she arranges his head with a comb, with attention'. When he arrives at the haven, each Russian offers some bread, meat, onions, milk and cider to an idol of wood surrounded by small idols; he then worships them, saying, Master, I have come a long way with so many Slavs and sable furs, &c., accept my presents. Then he places all that he has brought before the god, and he adds, Send to me a good merchant, very rich in all kinds of gold and silver. After which he goes away ; but in case of bad success in his commerce, he comes back to his idol with new presents, and brings some even to the little idols, conjuring them to accord him their protection, and prostrates himself humbly before them. When he has found a good market, he says to himself. The god has favoured me, I must pay him my debt. Then he sacrifices some oxen and sheep, and distributes some of their flesh to the poor, deposits the remainder before the idols great and small ; suspends to the first the heads of the victims, and, if during the night the dogs have devoured these viands, the Eussian cries out, "The god wishes me well, he has eaten my presents." 'When any one of them is attacked with a malady, they con- struct for him at a distance a tent, where they place him with some bread and water. Never do they approach too near the sick ; never speak to him, but every day one goes to see him, especially if he is poor or a Slav. If he recovers he returns to his friends ; in case he dies, and if he is a free man, they bum him ; if he is a Slav he is cast to the dogs and birds of prey. ' They hang a robber or a brigand immediately on a high tree, where he remains till the weather causes him to fall to pieces. ' Having been informed that they bum with singular cere- monies the bodies of their chieftains, I waited for an occasion to 1 Many particulars are necessarily omitted in the translation. DOWN TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 21 be a wituess, and I saw these ceremonies with my own eyes. They began by placing the dead in a grave, and wept over him for ten whole days, during which they made for him certain vestments. A poor man is generally burnt in a little boat. The possessions of a rich man are collected and divided into three portions ; one for his relations, another is sold for making the vestments, the third to buy liquors for the day when a slave of the dead is to be killed and burnt upon the body of his master. They drink day and night so immoderately that many expire glass in hand. 'At the death of a man of quality, his relations ask the slaves and his domestics, Which of you is willing to die for him ? I will, replies one of them. They then ask the same question of the women slaves, and one of them gives the same answer. Then they appoint two women for her guard, to follow her about, and even wash her feet, while his relations are making the vestments for the dead and preparing for the funeral pyre. Nevertheless, the slave destined to die drinks, sings, and diverts himself ' When the day for combustion had airived, I came to the river where the barque of the dead was secured, but it was no longer on the bank; it was placed on four posts, surrounded with great wooden idols in human form, around which they all marched round and round, the men pronouncing words I didn't understand. The dead was in his grave at some distance; they .then brought in the barque, a bench covered with cushions and Grecian stuffs. Immediately came an old hag, called the " angel of death,'' who extended the body upon the bench ; it is her duty to make all the vestments and preparations; and it is she who kills the slave. Then they draw the dead from his grave, also some cider and fruit, and the lute that had been deposited there. He wore the same clothes in which he died; the excessive cold of the earth had blackened the whole of his body, but the body was only altered in colour. They ar- rayed him in a shirt, boots, girdle, a camisole, and a silk coat ornamented with gold buttons, and a cap of marten skin. Im- mediately they placed him in the barque on the coverings, and they surrounded hiai with cushions, and placed before him 2 2 THE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 862, cider, fruit, aromatics, bread, meat, onions, and his weapons were deposited at his side. At last they brought him a dog divided into two parts, which were cast into the barque ; two horses, two cows, a cock, a chicken, all underwent the same fate. Then the girl devoted to death began to march from one place to another : she entered into a chamber, where one of the relations of her master came to console and converse with her for the last time. ' It was a Friday, after dinner, they brought the girl to a kind of cage prepared for the ceremony; the men carried her in their arms ; she looked at this cage pronouncing certain words ; three times they let her down to the earth and raised her again ; then they gave her a cockj whose head she cut off and cast it away; the others picked it up and threw it into the barque. I demanded the explanation of all this : the first time the interpreter told me. The girl has said, I see my father and mother ; the second time, Now I see all my relations are dead; the third time, There is my master, who is in glory, in paradise, surrounded with men and young people ; he calls me, let me go to him. They conduct her to the barque, where she takes off her bracelets, and gives them to the old hag, honoured with the name of the angel of the dead. Then she gives her golden anklets to two girls, who attend her under the name of the daughters of the angel of death. Immediately they carry her to a little cabin prepared at one end of the barque. The men, armed with bucklers and clubs, come and present to her some cider, that she drinks after having sung her requiem. The interpreter tells me that it is a sign that she is taking leave of her friends. They offer her some more cider, which she drinks, and she then sings a very long chant; but, all of a sudden, the hag compels her to drink more quickly, and to enter into the little cabin, where was laid the body of her master. 'At these words she became deadly pale; she could hardly force herself to enter, but she looked into the cabin; the hag seized her by the hair, and compelled her to enter with her. ' The men then began to beat loudly upon their shields, in order to prevent the other girls hearing the cries of their com- DOWN TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 23 panion, lest it should horrify them from dying some day for their own masters. ' Six men having penetrated into the cabin, she was placed beside the dead ; two of them took her by the legs, two others by the arms : the angel of death passed a nmning noose around her neck, and gave the strangling-cord to the two other men. The hag seized at the same instant a huge knife, and buried it in the bosom of the victim : she retired, and the men strangled her until the girl had rendered her last sigh. 'Then appeared on the scene the nearest relation of the dead : he was nude, and with one hand he took a lighted brand and lit the funeral pyre; the rest came with flaming torches, and cast them on the dead. Quickly, the pile, the barque, the cabins, the body of the master and of his slave, which was in the barque, were all surrounded with flames, and there arose a tremendous wind which fanned them. It happened that near to me was a Russian talking with my interpreter. The Russian said. You Arabs, you are fools, you bury a man that you have loved the most in the earth where he becomes a prey to worms ; we, on the contrary, burn him in the twinkling of an eye, in order that he may fly at once to para- ' At these words, the Russians cried out laughing boisterously, saying, " God, wishing to prove that he loved the dead, has sent the wind to consume him more rapidly." In effect, in less than an hour, the barque and the corpses were reduced to a cinder. At the very place where the barque had stood they raised upon the bank a kind of circular mound, in the midst of which they erected a column inscribed with the name of the dead, and of the Russian prince to whom he belonged. 'The princes of Russia commonly have in their palace a choice guard of 400 warriors, of which many die with them, or sacrifice themselves on these occasions. Each warrior has a girl that waits on him, washes his head, brightens his shield, and serves other domestic purposes. These 400 men sit below the prince upon grand sofas ornamented with precious stones. Nearer to the prince are accommodated 40 of his favourite women who receive his attentions : when he wishes to ride on 24 THE RUSSIANS FROM RIJRIK, 8G2, horseback, they bring hhn his horse to the foot of his throne ; and upon his return, he alights upon the same throne. ' The prince has a lieutenant who commands his armies, makes war upon enemies, and represents him before his subjects. ' Such are the details I have extracted, word for word, from the son of Fotzlan: may the author be responsible for their authenticity; God knows the truth of it better than any person.' Yet it is entirely conformable to everything that Nestor has related, as well as several other annalists, as regards the man- ners and customs of the Sclavs and Slave Russians. We know that the women were burnt with their dead husbands. Orieiital writers also assert that the peaceful Khozars were constrained to cede to the restless and turbulent Russians all the isles of the Volga where they sow buckwheat (du sarrazin)." (Kuku- rouze, Herbelot, Biblioth. Orient, au mot Eous)l] Vladimir, who had truly usurped the throne, wished to obliterate his crimes by a wise and benevolent government. He drove out from Russia a great number of Normans, who had become dangerous to the safety of the State. He founded the first schools and instituted courts of justice. Amid so much internal anarchy nothing particularly worthy of record occurred till 1223, when wandering hordes of Mongol Tartars flocked to the borders of the Sea of Aral. Their leader Tuschi, one of the sons of the famous Zenghis Khan, conducted them to the Caspian Sea and the banks of the Dnieper. The Russians were completely routed near Kalka, which flows into the Sea of Azoff, Another horde, about 1236, attacked the Bulgarians. Devastation, fire and sword, sparing no man, were followed by the seizure of all the women, children, and old men, who were carried into captivity. The Tartars ad- vanced to Vladimir, and again glutting their insatiable thirst for blood, pushed forward to Novgorod, and Kieff was similarly treated. For more than 200 years the Tartars reigned supreme in Russia. Vladimir, the chief principality, had Moscow for its central town. 1237, 8. Again was Russia overrun with fire and sword by the Tartar Batu Khan, some years before his invasion of DOWN TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 25 Poland and Silesia. Tartar tax-gatherers were established in the Russian cities as far north as Rostov and Jaroslavl, and for many years Russian princes as far as Novgorod paid homage to the Mongol khans in their court at Sarai. Their subjection to the khans was no trifle : at least a dozen Russian princes met their death at the hands of the Mongol executioner (Yule's Notes to Transl. of the Booh of Marco Polo). This Batu was a khan of the Golden Horde and bore the name of Sain Khan, the Good Prince!! Of him Carpini says (in the Latin text), " He was kind to his men, was terribly feared by them, but was most cruel in battle, very sagacious and particularly most cun- ning in war. At Moscow he ordered a general massacre and required that the right ears only of the victims should be brought as proofs of its accomplishment : accordingly 270,000 right ears were exhibited. This unsparing Tartar Khan had carried war and desolation, assisted by his three sons, away from Kiptchak Tartary right through the Caucasus to Poland and Hungary, also killing princes in Bulgaria, and on the Volga and Kama. 1303 — 1328. Andrei Alexandrovitch, Prince of Moscow, having endeavoured to deprive his brother Daniel of Pere- slavle, involved all Russia in the quarrel. But during these civil wars Andrei fortified Moscow, about 1304, with a deep ditch filled with water, a high rampart and a double wall defended by twelve towers, which once for all settled the inde- pendence of this dukedum\ Feeling the approach of death, Daniel turned monk ; he was the first prince buried at Moscow ^. 1328. His son, Duke Ivan, was appointed by the Tartar Khan to the principality of Vladimir. Accustomed to live in Moscow and on good terms with its Metropolitan, he trans- 1 Karamsin, Vol. it. p. 148. ' This principality became White Russia. He bad added to it that of Pere- slavle, Novgorod became the capital of Great Russia, and Kieff was the capital of Little Euisia. Into these three principal duchies did the seventeen princi- palities resolve themselves. 26 THE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 862, ferred his capital thither, fortified it with a wooden wall and a thrown-up bank of earth and stones'. Trusted by the Khan, these doings were not much regarded by the Tartars. 1336. By a series of victories the Tartars at length retook Moscow, and slew Yury, the Grand Duke, who had gone impru- dently to a marriage-feast at first instead of defending Moscow from the Tartars ; pushing forward they occupied Novgorod and then Kieff. These Tartar hordes then established themselves securely in the three princedoms. The Khan however before retiring placed on these thrones such as pleased him best by the mag- nificence of their presents. Torn, rent and disorganized for a long period, the aspect of Eussian affairs remained unchanged. At length, in the year 1362, Dmitri, a Russian prince, son of Ivan, having im- pressed his brother chiefs with the advantage of conferring upon him a patronizing protectorate (the key to all Russian successes), persuaded the clergy to preach up a crusade against the thraldom of the Tartars. They, as usual, promised crowns of glory and other fine things to the slain in battle. By fortunate circumstances the Tartars were defeated on the Don. Gun- powder introduced. In 1382 the Tartars took Moscow by treachery, and put the whole of its inhabitants to the sword without the slightest respect for age or sex. The most holy things were given to the flames. The Grand Duke, having fled, on his return found the town full of dead bodies. He offered a rouble for every 80 buried, and paid 300 roubles; so that 24,000 were thus interred, not including those who perished in the flames, were drowned in the Moskwa or driven in flocks as prisoners into slavery. " Besides the images and holy vessels," says Karamsin, "they took an enormous quantity of gold This populous capital formerly bubbled (' boiled ') with riches and with fame. In one day her beauty perished; smoke, ashes, the earth covered with dead bodies, deserts and burned churches alone 1 Stcherbatoff, Vol. iii. p. 366. DOWN TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 27 remained\" For a long time the city appeared almost bereft of inhabitants. A cornet^, it was thought, predicted this dreadful invasion. 1383. Peace with Tartary. The town was rebuilt. 1389. Death of Dmitri. _ The Tartars usually retired after their devastations, and in this way the infant Russia from time to time resuscitated her exhausted forces. The son of Dmitri ascended the princely throne. But those everlasting Tartars were always returning on their wild horses to ruin, burn, slay, and devour, fired with an insatiable lust and implacable brutality. It was in a severe school, indeed, that Young Russia formed the early elements of her future empire. Now the great Tamer- lane perpetrated new horrors, having once for all subdued in one mighty conquest the whole of the prowling hordes of the neighbouring steppes. The great principality of Vladimir had been called Moscow, whilst Kieff was under the Polish duke of Lithuania. In 1390 a fresh fire consumed many thousand wooden houses. In 1408 or 1409 again come the Tartar hordes. The Grand Duke fled with his wife and family, and he collected forces. But the citizens murmured. His aged brother Prince Vladimir encouraged the people. That the Tartars might not take primeta (or combustible materials) to the walls of the Kremlin, he ordered the suburbs to be fired. The people prayed in vain to be admitted to the Kremlin. The spectacle was dread and awful in the extreme. Universal consternation and cries of despair marked the torrents of destructive rivers of fire and smoke. Villains pillaged the houses untouched by fire ; with- out the Tartars, within the burning flames. Horror and mad- ness seized the frantic populace. However Edigii feared an. ^meute in his horde and decamped at last with enormous loot in money — 3000 roubles'. 1438. Again appear those infernal Tartars, worse than the ^ Vol. V. p. 8i. - Halley's comet. <' A large sum in those days. 28 THE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 862, most savage savagery of American Indians. As usual the Grand Duke fled. The Tartars, after lying before the walls, departed, and burned Kolomna and many other places. 1445. In fear of the Tartars the country people had flocked to lodge in the Kremlin. But the dryness of the season gave unexpected violence to a fire. Three thousand perished in the flames, afraid of the open country. Not one wooden building was left. The Grand Duchess could not discover a single house to live in (Karamsin). Innumerable fires, reckoning all we can, appear to have many times reduced this Moscow to ashes. A dreadfully severe earthquake was felt on the very day that the Khan of Tartary gave liberty to his prisoner, the Grand . Duke Vassilii Vasillievitch. Some lost their senses with terror, thinking the earth was opening her bosom to swallow Moscow. In 1451 those restless Tartar marauders again attacked the fated Moscow, set fire to it in many places and entered through the flames, in the midst of which crowds went to the temple with cries and tears, supplicating aid. The Tartars, tired of watching the flames, and disheartened by the fighting of the defenders, again disappeared. In 1470, and again in 1472, 1475, 1493 and 1547, immense fires nearly destroyed the town. Particialarly the last, which exceeded all others in dire results. Wooden edifices disappeared, stone buildings were demolished, iron glowed red as in the forge, melted copper flowed. The roaring of the storm, the crackling of the fire, the cries of the people, from time to time were drowned by the explosions of gunpowder. Reports were generally believed that the city had been burnt by the enchant- ment of sorcer-ers. In 1568 and 1570 the plague reappeared. But alas ! the Crimean Tartars now had their turn. In three hours three suburbs were burned : 100,000 perished, either by the flames or by the hands of the demon Tartars. Then it was that 23 persons of the British factory also perished'. Never was a town more combustible or so ravaged by 1 Letter to Richard Usoombe, August, 1571. DOWN TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 29 diabolized humanity. It is a remarkable fact tliat the very word used by Xenophon, Mosun, denotes a wooden house or tower, and Mosunockoi, easily contracted to Moscoi, in his time denoted "an Asiatic race near the Black Sea, neighbours to the Colchians and Tibareni, living in wooden houses." Strabo also uses the same term. The Moskow' people, or Muscovites, have therefore been already characterized by their preference for wooden houses or huts for above 2000 years. The peasants to this day carry an axe, and are so skilful in its use that in a very short time they can put up a small wooden hut for the con- venience of the traveller, where wood abounds. Moscow, however, again rose to greater importance than ever and completely eclipsed Kiefif, which proportionably declined. It is useless to detail the never-ending squabbles and wars waged for the next seventy years, and so the reader may pass on to 1462. Ivan Vasilivitch. He mastered Kazan in Tartary and was solemnly crowned about 1470, with a diadem said to be still used. Asiatic Bulgaria, and nearly all Lapland, sub- mitted to his rule. Even the great rival city Novgorod, after a seven years' siege, yielded immense treasures. But after he had quitted the city he largely practised the custom still popular with the Russians. He deported thousands of the inhabitants to various parts of the empire, substituting for them people of his own principality, more attached to his person and reign. He even imprisoned all the German merchants, abolished the old municipal franchise and gave a blow to its trade from which it never recovered. This prince more enlarged his dominions than any pre- ceding duke. Marrying the sister of Duke Tver, which effectually lulled suspicion, he deposed his ducal brother-in-law under pretence of revenging his father, and thus took possession of the province. On the death of his wife he married Sophia, daughter of the. expelled Thomas Palseologus. It was through her energetic representations that his spirit was roused to undertake his successful campaign against Kazan. ' The Busaiaus call Moscow Moskua, 30 THE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 862, He also acquired, by the law of might over right, Livonia and Esthonia. He died in 1505. 1505. Vassilii Ivanovitch, called Basilius III. 1530. Kazan Tartar rebellion. 300,000 prisoners carried off by the Tartars from Moscow, most of whom they sent to the Crimea or sold to the Turks. Immense treasure captured. Basilius died 1533. Ivan IV., his son, commonly called The Teerible. He emancipated Russia from Tartaric thraldom, seized the west shores of the Caspian, the right bank of the Volga, and the city of Astrakan ; inflicted summary vengeance on the conspiring inhabitants of Novgorod; executed "25000 of the conspirators"; accidentally formed commercial relations with England ; annexed Astrakan', and was defeated by the Tartars in 1571, who beleaguered Moscow; 50 rods of the city-wall were blown up by a powder magazine ; in the conflagration 120,000 Russians perished. Peace concluded with the Tartars in 1584. About this time Constantine, Duke of Ostrog, had the ancient MSS. of the Holy Scriptures collated and revised, and at his own expense had the whole published in the Slavonian language — a dead letter to the Russ. 1584. The Czar Ivan IV. dies: in his latter days he had been worsted by the Tartars. His sons Feodor and Dmitri were, it was believed, got rid of by Boris, by means of assassination and poison. Thus ended the dynasty of Rurik the Varangian, which had lasted 700 years. Boris, through the influence of the Patriarch, is elected by the nobles to the sovereignty; Moscow was shortly desolated by a famine, the most dreadful recorded in history : parents are said to have eaten their children and the children their parents. A Jesuit monk pretended to be the young Dmitri whom Boris had caused to be assassinated ; he retired to Poland, and so ingratiated himself with the king that he gained him over to his party; the Kossacks, oppressed ^ The provinee of Astrakan is an immense territory about 1000 miles long, between the rivers Ural and Volga ; the city of Astrakan being situated on one of the mouths of the latter. DOWiY TO TUB FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 31 by Boris, eagerly embraced his cause; Boris took poison 1605; his son Theodore was enthroned but soon dethroned, and the successful monk made his triumphant entry into Moscow with the utmost magnificence; the priests again excited the populace; an assault was made on the palace and the monk slain. [The coronation of this Jesuit monk was perhaps the most daring and in- genious manoeuvre ever executed by this powerful order for creating their grand lever of conquest, u. State within u State. They succeeded in insinuating a College at Moscow afterwards closed hy Peter. Catharine n., however, was hospitable to them as a simple religious order. They extolled her to the skies. She protected them notwithstanding the dissolution of their order by Clement XIV. and preserved their posts in the government of Wiite Eussia, which afforded a safe asylum. In 1800 they officiated in St Petersburg, their general formed a. College and began to make proselytes. They propagated the notion that science is unsuitable for military men, i. e. that 80,000 of the Eussian nobQity ought to be unlearned (learning was denounced as causing idleness, and destroying the impetuosity necessary for successful enterprise) : and that the higher classes ought not to apply themselves to study : they iuterdicted Greek and German ; they recommended Decorations. Their great apolo- gist Count do Maistre declared it was impossible to find a substitute for this useful body. " This Society is the watch-dog which you must not dismiss : if you do not allow it to bite the thieves, that is your affair ; but at least allow it to wander round your house and to awaken you before your doors are broken open, or they make entrance by the windows God is the author of this Society. It is God whom nations obey in the person of their sovereigns." They pleaded that they owed their preservation to Eussia, and therefore from gratitude, self-interest and necessity, they could have no other interest but that of the State ! In order to combat the principles of the Eeformatiou they adopted such imscrupulous and characteristic arguments as the following. "All should shudder at the fundamental sophism of Europe — 'Webeheve nothing but the Word of God.' What an abuse of words ! ...Are not the Holy Scriptures Writings ? were they not traced with a pen and a little hlach fluid ? Do they know what ought to be told to one man and hidden from another ? Do not Leibnitz (the great mathematician) and his maid read the same words there ? Can writing be anything but the portrait of a word and, if interrogated, must it not keep holy silence? If you attack or insult it, can it defend itself in the absence of its father? Let others then invoke as much as they please the dumb word. We laugh in peace at the false god."] 1613. The House of Romanoff was enthroned. The Rus- sians had offered the Grown to several neighbouring potentates — to a son of the King of Poland, if he would adopt the Greek faith : refused. They turned to a son of Charles IX. of Sweden in vain. Next they pressed it on a young native Russian^ aged sixteen, Mikhail Feodorovitch, of the House of Romanoff: a 32 THE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 8G2, family which was distantly related to their ancient Czars, and ■whose head was then Metropolitan or Bishop of Kostof. The clergy were here pre-eminently active ; they pretended revela- tions from Heaven ; they intrigued with all their might — a fine opportunity for aggrandizing the interest of their order. To cause the son of the Metropolitan to ascend the throne of Russia was to them a kind of ecclesiastical ecstasy. And they succeeded. Fortunately for Russia, this family, after such a huge series of confusion, ruin, and military disasters in Tartaric wars, was destined to raise the Russian throne to a glory of empire, a grandeur of extent, and a consolidation of power, un- paralleled in the history of mankind. But these magnificent results were the work of time and policy. The young Mikhail found party spirit run high : and though he inaugurated economy, alliances and commerce, it was left to his son Alexei to carry out these beneficial ideas. He died— after initiating mighty changes — in the year 1645. Alexei. Ambitious as Boris, imprudent so as to incur universal hatred, he totally neglected home policy, but connived at flagrant enormities in judicial cases. The populace rebelled, and to appease their wrath one of the most nefarious judges was executed. Alexei now patronized the Cossacks. The Polish clergy tried to impose Catholicism. He protected them as his subjects. He improved the Russian laws, and caused a standard Digest, called the Uloshenid, to be made, which long abrogated all other laws. He left his son Feodor heir to the Russian throne. 1676. Feodor reigned but a short time, but he made a "happy despatch" of the ancestral pretensions of the quarrel- some Russian nobility, who continually squabbled on questions of precedence. He ordered all their written genealogies to ba confided to him. He publicly consigned the whole collection to the flames. All nobility now could only flow from the throne. He died in the same year. 1682. Pkter I., a half brother, should have succeeded, but this would have highly displeased the nobles, particularly DOWN TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 33 Galitzin the late prime minister, who had espoused the cause of Sophia, the sister of the brothers Feodor and Ivan, and a princess of the most insinuating address and eminent abilities. The qualities of this lady are quite a study. Exquisite in beauty, she enslaved the heart of the wise Galitzin. To reign was the chief desire of her heart. Thousands were slain in her contests with Peter's party. By false accusations she compassed the death of sixty nobles, plotted the death of Peter, her half brother ; failing this she excluded him from the throne. " What a sea of blood seems," says Ker Porter, " to encom- pass her grave ! I shuddered when I looked at the end of all this guilt — a stone bed of six feet square. Forty-six years terminated this career of ambition, murder, and incest : and all for what ? — a throne' ! " Death ensued five years after the plot. Ivan was weak in body and mind. Peter was then only ten years old; Sophia and Galitzin rided Kussia. The plot thickened. Peter was now 17. He successfully lulled the suspicions of Sophia, fascinated his youthful companions, Gordon a Scotch- man, and Lefort a Genoese, and secretly won over partisans. When too late, Sophia formed a plot for his assassination, but discovered in time she was banished to a nunnery. Peter now reigned supreme. Lefort and Gordon were ordered to levy new regiments on the European model. He learned the trade of a shipwright at Archangel, fitted up a workshop, despatched young Kussians to European arsenals ; relit the torch of war in Turkey, decoyed artillerists and engineers from the Dutch, provided transports, defeated the Turks by sea and land at Azof, and OCCUPIED it. To form a Black Sea fleet was now his most ardent desire. Russia was essentially an inland power. The ocean he felt was life, and the land death, to his far-reach- ing schemes. A ukase commanded the patriarch, the nobility, clergy and merchants, to contribute funds to equip a navy. He sent young nobles on a European tour; and proclaimed a similar project for himself. At length, warring with Sweden, he ob- tained quiet possession of the Baltic. He made a triumphal entry into Moscow, the ostentatious vanity of which exceeded all similar exhibitions of pride. The Swedes ceded Livonia, 1 Sketches in Russia, by Sir W. Ker Porter. E. 3 34 THE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 862, Esthonia, Ingria, part of Karelia, Vyborg, the isle of Osel, and all islands from Courland to Vybourg ; for which he gave them back Finland. He erected an Observatory in St Petersburg, predicted eclipses, and so taught his subjects to consider such a phenomenon no longer ominous nor full of menace. He cer- tainly diminished the barbarism of his subjects. Peter, as a reward of these enormous spoils of gratuitous war, received from the Senate the august title of Emperor and Autocrat of all the Russias. He died in 1725. His benign, beloved and gentle consort, Catharine I., reigned two years, in which she found time to win the hearts of her people, and extended the Empire over Georgia. She recalled the exiles from Siberia, sent thither by Peter: the Kubinskian Tartars voluntarily offered their homage. She settled the crown on Peter II., the son of Alexei, then twelve years of age. Latterly she gave herself- up to flagrant excesses, and was probably poisoned. 1727. Under the tutelage of Prince Menzikoff, whose daughter Catharine had decreed him to marry, the young Emperor was thus early left in the hands of unscrupulous designers. Menzikoff, originally a pie-boy, had been raised by Peter to distinction, and was now a chief officer of State, but surrounded with enemies, who persuaded Peter to banish the minister and all his family to Siberia. Thus having cleared the ground, they persuaded this lad of tender years to take violent exer- cises unsuitable to his age, and to exhaust his unripened strength with hunting sports, and other athletic exercises. It is sup- j)osed that debility ensued, and small-pox rapidly finished his career in 1730. The Russian Senate and nobility, now setting aside the will of Peter I. and that of Catharine I., made Anne, duchess of Courland, Empress. Her reign proved prosperous. In a new war she was induced to give up Azof and Moldavia to Turkey, and as a set-off for a loss of 100,000 men and vast sums of money, Russia gained the privilege of building a fortress on the Don ! Anne died in 1740. Ivan the son of her niece was then DOWxV TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 35 entitled by her will to the throne. But Elizabeth, Peter the First's daughter, was proclaimed in the night: the family of Mecklenburg were seized. All but Ivan were exiled to the mouth of the Dwina in the White Sea. His father died in prison. The youthful Emperor Ivan was imprisoned in the castle of Schlussenberg, and was there done to death in a cruel The Empress Elizabeth began to reign in 1741. She was vain in the extreme, capricious and unjust. She abolished capital punishment, but retained a lingering death from the effects of torture. She had inscribed on her coins Elizabeth the Clement, yet she ordered two ladies of extraordinary beauty, guilty of no real crime (whatever was pretended), to be ex- posed almost naked, on a scaffold, to be subjected to the most inhuman infliction of the knout, and had their tongues cut out with every circumstance of the most outrageous barbarity. Beauty with her was an unpardonable crime. Abandoning herself to vice and every excess of intemperance, she was in- flexibly severe to those who imitated her noble example. She was prodigal, pusillanimous, vindictive and inconstant. Eliza- beth died a victim of cancer and excessive indulgence in Tokay. Her successor was Peter III., grandson of Peter I. by Anne. "His education was shamefully neglected. In childhood they treated him as a man, in manhood they amused him as a child." Catharine II. became Empress June 8, 1762. 1762. Grand Duke Peter III. ascended the throne. His chief amusement was buffoonery. He suffered himself to be persuaded that the Russians were fools and beasts, unworthy of his attention except to make them by means of the Prussian discipline good fighting machines. Honoured with a gifted and accomplished consort, Catharine Vorontzoff, of great beauty and in the prime of life, he loved a mistress one degree above an idiot. Three brothers, the nobles Orloff, gained over 8,000 men. Catharine making herself popular, compiled improved laws, privately circulated. All was ready. Revolt broke forth. Peter was imprisoned. Made to drink poison, he was in this state strangled in the most brutal manner. 3—2 36 THE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 862, Peter in a faint voice said to his murderers, the Princes Baratinski, and Orloff who had already thrown down the Em- peror and was pressing upon his breast with both knees and firmly griping his throat with his hand, " It was not enough then to prevent me reigning in Sweden, and deprive me of the crown of Russia, I must also be put to death." The unhappy monarch now struggling with the strength of despair, the two other assassins threw a napkin round his neck, and put an end to his life by suffocation. " It is affirmed that on the very day on which it happened, while the Empress was beginning her dinner with much gaiety, an officer," supposed to be one of the assassins, entered the apartment precipitately, with his hair dishevelled, his face covered with sweat and dust, his clothes torn, and his counte- nance agitated with horror and dismay. On entering, his eyes, sparkling and confused, met those of the Empress. She arose in silence, went into a closet, whither he followed her. In a few moments afterwards she sent for Count Panin, the former Governor, whom she had already appointed her minister. They together devised the plan, as the least suspicious, of exposing the body of the murdered emperor three days to the public gaze. On the following day a manifesto was issued, that Peter had died of hemorrhoidal colic, and the brand-new empress appeared bathed in tears. The face of the dead was black and the neck excoriated. Notwithstanding these horrible marks, it was left for three days exposed to all the people, with only the ornaments of a Holstein officer." The unhappy Peter III. thus fell in 17(>2 in the 34th year of his age, having reigned only six months. 1762. Catharine II. The events of the reign of Catha- liue II. thickened so fast that it is here impossible to enumerate them. In 1764 she caused the assassination of the dethroned Czar Ivan. She declared in a manifesto that " he was put to death by the officers of his guard, alleging an attempted escape." 1766. A carousal was appointed for the nobility, the splen- dour of which outshone all former attempts of the kind. A thousand spectators were present. DOWN TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 37 1772. The Scotchman Grieg highly distinguished himself as an officer in the Kussian army in a war against Turkey. 1775. By war, successfully maintained, the Crimea was wrested from Turkish rule. 1783. The Empress instituted schools with extraordinary vigour. 1784. Georgia annexed. 1790. Ismail surrendered its fortress with 42,000 Turks : 88,000 slain on the spot (the Turks do not often run away) : 2,000 died of wounds : 9,000 were taken prisoners, and 265 pieces of cannon were captured, yet the Russians only lost, as they say, 1,850 killed and 2,450 wounded. The next year, after severe defeats of the Turks, the Russians acquired the country lying between the Bug and Dniester. Here we have a vivid example of the use Russia made of her Tartars. The fortress of Anapuas was taken by storm, when the garrison of 25,000 men were all slain excepting the quarter given to 1,000 prisoners. The Turks had 80,000 men, but besides a numerous army the Russians had the hordes of two Tartar Sultans. We cannot discover what were the numbers of the hordes which accompanied them. Repnin, the Empress' very particular favourite, commanded the army. 1792. Catharine II. declared war against Poland. She could not forgive the new constitution which the Poles had elaborated for their political and social improvement. She could not endure the spectacle of a nation which she had destined to swell her dominions, rising, as it were from the grave of chaotic forces, to a new bright career of national manhood. Russia in the olden time had to record many a wound given by the valorous yet vainglorious Poles. They had burnt Moscow, which itself had once been merely a fief of their empire. Their very existence was a standing reproach to the portentous and magnificent empire now bursting into marvel- lous activity and life. Here, more than anywhere, the proud flourish of the trumpets of an ancient empire sounded harsh in the ears of the daring yet cautious genius of the Russian 38 THE RUSSIANS FROM RVRIK, 862, nation. Poland, by its peculiar geographical position, if not conquered, could dominate from three cardinal points of the compass — north, south, and east. The Empress sent into Poland two of her very best generals, Suwarroff and Fersen. Her troops entered Poland, and their atrocities will ever blot the pages of Russian aggression. 1795. "In this year, by treaty with England, Russia agreed to furnish Great Britaia with 10,000 troops! and 2,000 horse in case of invasion!! whilst we engaged to send, if required, two seventy-four ships, six of sixty. and four of fifty guDS, with a complement of 4,560 men." (The British valour must have been in high honour indeed.) But the last important act of this imperial lady's reign consisted in attempting to take Derbend, an important city on the shores of the Caspian. But the Persians defeated the Russians. She died, leaving a son ; infamy and wickedness stain her memory. 1796. Paul I. in his 42nd year. In order to shew his filial respect to his father Peter III., he caused his corpse to be removed to the cathedral and to lie in state three days and nights, compelling his murderers to watch over it night and day. A dreadful mark of his justice, surely most terrible to the guilty. The Emperor Paul had many extravagances. During his visit to the dockyards he observed a fellow diligently caulking. " Admirably caulked," cried he, " you must be re- warded for this. Rise, rise, I confer on you the rank of Lieut.- General," and threw over the enraptured caulker several orders. " The poor man was made," says Ker Porter, " a Lieutenant- General, but unmade as a man, for reason deserted her throne. He seems perfectly happy decorated with stars and ribbons, in full military dress, and accosts every man of rank he meets as brother.'' 1799. Having entered into an alliance offensive and de- fensive with his Britannic Majesty, who agreed to pay Russia £44,000 per month, £58,929 towards equipping a Russian fleet, and £19,642 per month so long, as this fleet should be imder English command ; Russia on her part engaged to furnish 17,500 troops, and artillery to match, six ships, five DOWIf TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 39 frigates, and two transports, for carrying a British invading force ; yet wonderful to record, notwithstanding a Russian fleet actually joined us in Yarmouth Roads, Paul in the very next year openly repudiated his treaty and joined the great Northern coalition of Sweden, Denmark and Prussia against Great Britain. Insanity began to show itself in the Romanoff family. Paul — incessantly tormenting his army with military caprices, alternately honouring and humiliating the captive king of Poland, and saluting his coffin when dead, raising a statue to Suwaroff after he had caused that glorious Russian general to die broken-hearted — was haunted with a' thousand mad caprices, and wore out the patience of friends and foes. Though he was clearly insane he was not deposed. In Asiatic nations, the bowstring, poison or the dagger seem to be the approved forms of getting rid of a troublesome emperor or sultan. Count Pahlen, governor of St Petersburg, with other men of rank, Zuboff and his brothers, resolved he should die. On the 11th of March, o. s., 1801, his assassins, gaining entrance by a stair- case, cut down his faithful guard, and rushed into the apart- ment. He entrenched himself behind the chairs, and as they advanced knocked down one of the conspirators. A dreadful conflict now aroused the Empress, but a voice whispered instant death on the least alarm. The murderers having beaten him down, completed their work with a sash twisted twice round the naked neck of the Emperor. His son Alexander on ascend- ing the throne extended his mercy to the murderers of his father ; Zuboff was merely ordered not to approach the palace, and the Governor Pahlen was quietly transferred to Riga ! ! It was this very Alexander who was fated to witness the dread- ful conquests of Napoleon and the burning of Moscow in 1812. A sequel of the Tilsit, Russo-French plot. 1801. Alexander, whilst cultivating the friendship of Great Britain, established a University in Lithuania, emancipated the Jews, leagued with England as against France ; levied 100,000 men ; assured the Porte of amicable intentions, fought at Eylau, surrendered 18,000 Russians and Prussians to the French at Dantzig; and lost 30,000 Russians in the German campaign. 40 THE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 862, Turkey incited by France declared war against Russia, who now concluded an armistice with France. On the 25th June on the Niemen, Napoleon and Alexander concluded the infamous treaty of Tilsit (1807), which in its effects really sacrificed millions of human lives. Alexander now assumed the undigni- fied and unworthy character of Napoleon's ally. 1811. Russia commenced a new war with Turkey. So true is it that a powerful and voracious State can never want pretexts for attack. But Napoleon was enraged with his brother emperor, and organized an invasion which ended in the final destruction of his immense armies, retreating from Moscow. Leipsic finished French domination. Russia seizing her opportunity pushed to the forefront. At the Congress of Vienna, the duchy of Warsaw was secured as her share of the prey. She got four-fifths of the territory and three-fourths of the Polish population. Russia might well now pause. Catharine II. had ac- quired the Crimea, Georgia, Bessarabia and part of Moldavia and other Turkish lands, Courland, and a large slice of Poland. Alexander vanquished in the Caucasus several tribes ; ab- sorbed Daghestan (East of the Black Sea). Finland and other parts were ceded in 1813; and also Napoleon's Grand Duchy of Warsaw : the total population of aU these certainly exceeding 15 millions. 1815. The Foreign Policy of Alexander may be thus summarized. — (1) Suppression of revolutionary movements in Europe. (2) The prostration of Turkey to Russian power. (3) Sovereignty in the Levant. (4) Paving the way to India. (5) The formation of the Holy Alliance — one of the first instances of a triple imperial conspiracy condescending to profane Christianity as a pretext for spoliation. (6) The gradual isolation of Turkey as regards the rest of the European world : and a total dependence on Russian protection. DOWN^ TO THE FALL OF SFBASTOPOL, 1855. 41 In foreign policy his great object was the extension of the Russian Empire by unscrupulous diplomacy, and when that failed, by war. The most important affair to Englishmen is the design of Russia upon our Indian Empire. The elaborate system of intrigue amongst our continental neighbours was not how- ever revealed till after Alexander's death. This Emperor actually projected the serf-freedom, patronised youthful edu- cation, and " missionary enterprise. " But his latter end was completely miserable. Disappointment in policy, religious de- pressiiDn, terror of extermination of the whole royal family, which urged upon him incessant travel from place to place to avoid the dagger, the bullet or the poisoned cup, culminated in death at Taganrog, Sea of Azof, Dec. 1. 1825. His brother Constantine, after proclamation, de- clined the throne. Nicholas I. and his consort were crowned at Moscow. Duke Constantine Russianized Poland. 1826. Immediately war being declared against Persia she was compelled to sue for peace. Russia now secured Erivan and Wakshivan, and replenished her treasury with £8,000,000 sterling. The same year 150,000 Russians invaded Turkey: as also Asia. Paskievitch won Poti, now being transformed into a Black Sea Liverpool, which, when the railway is completed (if not already finished) to the Caspian, will form one more stage to Central India. In a single week he took Kars. 1829. In the spring 120,000 Russians again crossed the Danube. The remainder reaching the Balkans crossed them without opposition. Though weakened marvellously by sickness and fatigue, hundreds dying daily, Diebitsch adroitly managed to conceal his real condition from the Turk, who, had he known the exhaustion of his enemy, could easily have arrested his march over the Balkans ; but the Russian commander astutely working upon the Turkish fears of a march to Con- shantinople, a treaty of peace was extorted, which further un- dermined the Turkish power to an enormous extent. Russia exacted a war indemnity of £5,000,000, to be paid 42 THE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 862, by instalments, and secured the possession of the Princi- palities as a material guarantee for ten years. Not a single Mussulman was to remain there : fortresses, cities and lands as well as the mountains of the Caucasus were all surren- dered. 1830. Nicholas crowned at Warsaw, Polish language abolished. Multitudes deported to Siberia, to the Caucasus, and enrolled in the army. A new Calendar, weights and measures imposed. 1840. Nicholas sent' out an expedition against Khiva. 1849. Fall of Hungary. Turkey manfuUy refused to give up Hungarian refugees. Nicholas threatened, but the British fleet appeared in the Dardanelles and he at once lowered his tone. 1853. Sinope Massacre : Te Deum commanded by the Emperor. 1854. Our fleet having been ordered into the Black Sea, sailing with that of France, the Russian ambassador closed his embassy in London. The war commenced. 1855. Sardinia joined the Allies. Fall of Sebastopol. 1855. March 2. Death of Nicholas I. Accession of Alexander II. the present Emperor, nO]VJ!i TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 43 Tabular List of Chieftains, Dukes, Czars, and Emperors OF Russia, with their dates of Accession. I. DoitES oE Chiefs or Kieff. A.D. Eurik 861 Igor 878 Sviatoslof 945 Yaropoli I. 972 Yladimix the Great 980 Yaroslaf I. 1015 Isiaslaf 1054 Vsevolod I. 1078 Sviatopolk 1093 ■Vladimir II. 1114 Mslislaf, or Michael I. 1125 Yaropoli H. 1132 Viatoheslaf (eight days) 1138 Isiaslaf 11. 1146 Eostislaf, Isiaslaf III. 1154 Yury, Igor, or George I. 1155 II. Grand Dukes op Vladiiiie. Andrew I., Michael II. 1157 Vsevolod in. 1177 Yiiry, Igor, or George II. 1213 Yaroslaf H. 1238 Saint Alexander Nevsky 1245 Yaroslaf HI. 1263 Vasim, or Basil I. 1270 Dmitri I. 1277 Daniel 1294 Yury, Igor, or George ni. 1802 Michael HI. 1305 Vasilii, or Basil II. 1320 George III. restored 1325 III. Geand Dukes of Moscow. Ivan, or John I, Simeon Ivan, or John 11. Dmitri II. 1328 1340 1353 1359 Vasilii, or Basil III. Vasilii, or Basil IV. Ivan, or John III. Vasilii, or Basil V. A.D. 1389 1425 1462 1506 IV. CzAES OF MnscovY. Ivan, or John IV. 1534 Feodor, or Theodore I. 1584 Boris Dodunof 1598 Feodor, or Theodore II. )-.„„_ (six weeks) i Dmitri (the Jesuit), •> pretended son of Ivan 11604 IV. ) Schouisky, or Basil VI. 1605 Vladislaf (elected but re- fused the Crown) Mildiail, or Michael (Ro- manoff) Alexei Feodor, or Theodore III. Ivan V. and Peter I. to-) 1610 1613 1645 1676 gether 1682 V. Empeeoes of Russia Peter I., the Great, alone 1696 Catharine I. 1725 Peter n. 1727 Anne 1730 Ivan VI. 1740 EHzabeth 1741 Peter III. murdered (six months) Catharine II. |l762 1762 Paul I. murdered 1796 Alexander I. 1801 Nicholas I. 1825 Alexander II. (the pre)j„,_ sent Emperor) i 44 THE RUSSIANS FROM RURIK, 862, NOTES TO CHAPTEK II. (1) Nestor, the grand foundation of early Eussian history, says nothing of the discontent of the natives with the Scandinavian rulers invited by them. He tells us, however, that Burik and his brothers Sineous and Trouvor were accompanied by numerous bands of armed Scandinavians, Normans or Varangians. The three brothers fixed themselves respectively at Novgorod, Bielo-Ozero' and Izborsk, Smolensk and Potolsk remaining independent. The message sent was this — by ambassadors : " Our country is great and fertile, but under the empire of anarchy. Gome and govern us and reign over us." Karamsin says modern historians pretend that the natives soon murmured against their new rulers, and that a certain Vadime called "the Brave" perished by the hands of Eurik. However it is curious to remark in the treaty of peace signed afterwards by his grandson Sviatoslof that above a dozen Norman or Scandinavian names of brothers-in-arms were attached to the treaty. (2) It appears that the illustrious success of Eurik and his brothers attracted many other Normans to Eussia. Oleg became acquainted with the delicious chmate of Southern Eussia and its other advantages, which attracted him to Kieff, where the princes Asoold and Dir had established themselves, his com- patriots and equals in arms. Oleg therefore and a small band, concealing the bulk of his army, approached as false merchants, and thus succeeded by a ruse in murdering these princes. " The beauty of the site," says Karamsin, " the easiness of boating on the Dnieper, and the facilities for either making war or commerce with many rich countries, such as the Crimea, Bulgaria, and even Constantinople, enchanted Oleg to that degree of ecstasy that he exclaimed. Let Kieff be the mother of all Russian towns." Oleg, who had meditated only war, resolved to estabUsh himself on the frontier, in order, says Karamsin, to have the power of promptly invading the strangers' countries. He wished to terrify his neighbours instead of being frightened by them. He soon became the terror of those without and of rebels within his frontiers. He soon com- pelled the Drevlians to pay a heavy tribute — the furs of black martens. He united Novgorod to Kieff, and then attacked the Crimea. But the new capital of Eussia (Kieff), while this Eussian hero (as he is called) was floating his victorious flag on the Bug and the Dnieper, was startled by the appearance of the Ougres (ancestors of the Magyars of to-day) — their encampment is still called (says Nestor) Ougarskoi — who now spread themselves over Moldavia, Bessarabia and WaUachia. Oleg, however, did not hesitate tiU the day of his death to reign, long after Igor had attained his majority. ' Igor received at the hands of Oleg a wife called Olga, who was of a Norman family of a low order, living near Pskoff in a viUage, whom the young prince, engaged in the chase, first saw, and preferred her to all others, in spite of the low birth of her parents. This girl was destined to become one of the most remarkable characters of liussian history. DOWN TO THE FALL OF SEBASTOPOL, 1855. 45 Kieff was destroyed under the attack of the Mongol Batn in 1204. A fatal hour for Kieff — the Eussian mother of cities, magnificently placed on the bania of the Dnieper, with its white walls, its beautiful gardens, and its thirty churches, with their gilded cupolas, which gave it its pretty Tartar name, " Court of the Golden Heads." It was the metropolitan city of old Eussian princes, the seat of the chief patriarch of All Eussia. It had latterly Buffered much from internal Eussian hroUs, it was now to be erased altogether. The terrible hosts of the enemy came on, and the noise of their -carts, the miurmurs of their herds of camels, oxen, and horses, and their own ferocious cries, drowned the voices of the inhabitants within. The attack continued night and day. Fugitives of all classes were collected on the flat roof of the great church, which gave way and overwhelmed a vast hecatomb in its ruins. The Mongols slaughtered all without mercy ; the very bones were torn from the tombs and trampled under the horses' hoofs, as were the bones of Vladimir and the tomb of Olga'. (3) The peculiar subtilty with which Olga took so deep a revenge is well related by Nestor. She replied, when her hand was sought, " Tom: proposition is very agreeable. I cannot revive my husband. When my men come towards you (in your boats) order them to carry you on their shoulders." At the instant Olga ordered a deep pit to be prepared. The next day the ambas- sadors said, " We will go neither on foot nor on horseback, but your men shall carry us on their shoulders." According to their secret orders they precipitated them into the pit. The vindictive princess caused them to be buried ahve. She sent fresh messengers, declaring that the Kievians would not let her depart without a very numerous guard of honour. The Drevlians sent the most iUustrious chiefs and citizens, who were honoured with fetes and baths. On pretext of sacrificing to her widowhood, she gathered them all together, in- toxicated them with hydromel, and at a signal had every one of them mas- sacred. Such was a pagan widow's revenge. ^ Histoire de VBmpire de Bussie. CHAPTER III. TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. To form a true estimate of the Russians we must consider all the mighty influences which have affected their national exist- ence. Though in the time of Herodotus they were recognized as Moschians, who lived to the north-east of the Black Sea, and as people remarkable for their national attachment to wooden huts, or houses, these mountains formed almost the only defiles through which south-eastern hordes could con- veniently reach Europe. The Huns first appeared, crossing the Sea of Azof and the River Don. They swooped forward from the Chinese Wall and Manchu Tartary, and the country between the Irtish river and the Altaian mountains. These people built no cities or houses ; they regarded a walled enclosure as only fit for a sepulchre, and never believed in, or trusted themselves to, the safety of a roof. So early as 100 A.D. the southern Huns drove out the northern, and projected them upon the Bashkirs, whence they were propelled forward again by the Alans and other continually increasing eastern hordes, until they took quiet possession of the Volga and the Don. Later, still further increased, they precipitated themselves upon the Goths, who had just then succeeded in the high cultivation of a fertile country. The king of the Goths fortified himself between the Pruth and the Danube (Roumania). But reduced to despair the Goths obtained leave to cultivate the waste lands of Thrace, and their celebrated bishop invented for them the Gothic alphabet. These barbarian incursions delivered England from the Romans, who withdrew to protect Rome. TAETARDOM IN RUSSIA. 47 Russia became the changing scene of many a nation often dis- placed by a new one. For two thousand years and more this vast country has at one time or another been overflown by barbaric hordes. Some remained, others dispersed, whilst not a few formed alliances and sharpened the tame blood of heredi- tary serfs with the wild pulses of the roaming savages of the desert. From a copy of a map drawn in the ninth century, it appears on inspection that at this time the Black Sea was called the Russian Sea; the Baltic, the Sea of the Varangians or North- men ; and that the Slaves existed only about Novgorod around Lac Hmen, near the Baltic. Ijoea. N. VOJANS. — W.- Slaves. -E. — Vesses. S. Kewitches. And this district is about twice the size of the Crimea. The following cities are also on this map : Cherson. Rostof. Kief Mourom ori the Oka. Potolsk. Sarkel on the Don. Smolensk. The Grand City of Bulgaria Novgorod. on the Volga. Atel, a town at the mouths of the Volga. The Caspian Sea was the Sea of the Khvalisses. On this map Moscow did not exist. But as this city was destined to become the seat of empire and the scene of the most tremendous events in national histories, we shall here give an account of its foundation. J.i is related that a Prince Georges, having punished with death, for want of respect, a rich noble dwelling on the banks 48 TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. of the Moskva, was perfectly delighted with the situation, and gave to the lovely daughter of the decapitated lord his son Andre, prince of Vladimir, as husband. "Moscow," say the historians of those days, " was a third Rome, and there never will exist a fourth. The capital was built just where the head of a murdered man was found ! the foundations are equally ensanguined, this new city gives its name to an immense empire." It was called during a long period Koutchkavo (d'Etienne Koutcho being the name of the former lord of the soil and owner of the village). The Russians loved Kiefif as the birthplace of their empire. They gave it a gate of gold. In 1169, "the vanquishers of this renowned fortress forgot they were Russians." Andrd gave Kieff to his brother Gleb, though nothing remained of its magnificent buildings, monasteries, and churches, but smoking ruins encumbered with the dead. They seized all the precious images, sacred ornaments, books, and even the bells. The naif annalist justifies all this by the statement that the Kievians thus expiated some false dogmas admitted by their metropolitan Constantino. During more than 200 years Russia was torn indeed with civil wars, and the inroads of foreign enemies; but this was, alas ! a golden age compared with the times about to foUow. The country was sprinkled with the blood and tears of many generations. In 1224 Russia heard the dread name of the Tartars. The moment was arriving when unparalleled disasters (destroyed armies, provinces trampled under the Mongol hoof, ruin and devastation) were about to culminate in a grandeur of tragedies, and epochs of massacres, unknown elsewhere in the history of mankind. Turn we now to a description of these dreadful agents of domination and destruction. "From the fourteenth century robbers had been punished with the gallows. The Russian used blows only in the heat of dispute. It was the Tartar yoke that introduced among us corporal punishment, branding for robbery, and the infliction of the knout for political offences. How could the disgrace of flagellation be of any avail where branded men still re- mained in society ? Our ancient history presented much greater crimes than the mere ferocity of princes and people. For the TARTARDOM IX RUSSIA. 49 sentiments of oppression, fear and hatred, stamped upon the manners of the age a dark and fierce expression. The actual character of the Russians retained some of the stains which soiled the Mongol harbarians. The Tartars were called by us ' THE IMPURE.' We regarded them as enemies both impious and odious; and in spite of the vile slavery into which they plunged us, we perceived the superiority of our civil existence : and the Russians, when once free, developed rather a European than an Asiatic character. Still we remained contemptible in the eyes of Europe, because for two hundred and fifty years we remained stationary '." At this time Russia was a very paradise for hunters. Abounding in fallow-deer and game on the wing, the earth was covered with forests thick and impenetrable, and a general tranquillity reigned in the deepest solitudes, so favourable to the increase of game : even in the eleventh century, wild horses, buffaloes, wild boars and stags, wandered in Southern Russia ; but towards the fifteenth, the castor, the goat, and the elk, en- joyed their full liberty in the North. Innumerable flocks of swans visited the rivers and lakes. But Russia, newly and thinly inhabited, a constant prey to sanguinary wars, famine and pestilence, was only rich in these brute gifts of Nature. "Yet the merchants belonging to the Golden Horde, fixed at Moscow, Tver, and Rostof, brought the precious products of Asia, in exchange for rich furs and falcons'*. On their part, the Russians sold to the Mongols the fabrics of Germany at Kazan, which had taken the place of the ancient capital of the Bul- garians, then destroyed, and Kazan had become the grand mart of the Eastern and Western worlds. We paid most exactly our tribute to the Tartar Khan of the Horde." (Marco Polo, the Venetian traveller, speaks of Glacial Russia and the banks of the Caspian Sea, where, he says, the people have a beautiful figure and a white complexion, and that their country was rich in mines and silver.) " We paid for each village a certain tribute, but our com- • Hutoire de V Empire de Bussie. ' This fact perhaps in some measure reconciled the BussianB to their Tar- tardom. R. 4 50 TARTARDOM IX RUSSIA. merce with the horde repaid us all that was sent. In fact, we became richer for this connection. Yet, as silver was scarce, the Russians had recourse to pieces of skins, skins of martens, and complete squirrels, as money. And, since the Mongols had separated us from the rest of Europe, the Western monarch s ceased to contract alliances with us, yet the Moscovites learned, in course of time, through merchants coming from Germany, of new European inventions, such as gunpowder for cannon and the invention of paper, which they then began to use instead of parchment." Well, in 1433, an archbishop of Novgorod actually erected a palace of stone, built by German artists, with thirty doors, ornamented with paintings and a clock ^. Kieff however, that ancient seat of the Moscovites, embellished with the chefs- d'oeuvre of Byzantine art, and enlivened by the afHuence of the Italian, German, and Greek merchant princes, in the 15th century, greatly surpassed Moscow. Kieff was readily reached from Constantinople, and the Greek language was indispen- sable to its merchants. The exploits of Alexander the Great, the heroes of antiquity, and "The Riches of the Indies," were favourite Greek studies, and especially the "Arabian Nights continued." Kieff was the nursing mother of the Russians. The origin and progress of the Tartars is now worth attention. A comparatively small horde of Chinese Tartars dwelt in the north of China, but about the middle of the 12th century they began to be notorious. A young chief, brought up by his mother in the simplicity of pastoral life, was about to astonish the world as a new hero — subjugate millions of men, and over- whelm the most illustrious monarchies. His successes spread in all directions; "God," said he, "gives the whole world to Temoutchin, and its master ought to receive the name of Zenghis Khan," which means. Grand Khan. The whole of the Eastern regions poured forth their myriads at his orders. Thibet itself recognized his sway. The celebrated "Garden of the East," now called Turkistan, at once fell an easy prey to his attacks. This country, so distinguished from the most ancient 1 Karamsin, t. 486. TARTARDOM IX RUSSIA. 51 times for its fertile plains, its rich mines, beautiful forests, lim- pid waters, and the civilization and the prodigious population of its cities, was converted almost into a desert. It was there that Bokhara had the grand school for the Mahometan youth. There, Sarmacand contained its hundred thousand soldiers, and an enormous quantity of elephants ; and there, Khiva revelled in its eastern glories and Asiatic riches. For nearly three years these ferocious Tartar executioners ravaged the whole country from the Sea of Aral to the Indus, so that for the next six hundred years the country could not reach its former flourishing state. Mahomet the Second, who had reigned there under the title of the second Alexander the Great, retired to a small isle in the Caspian Sea, to expire, overwhelmed with rage and despair. The Mongols penetrated through the Caucasus by a clever ruse and reached the Sea of Azof, subduing all the nations along their route. Many flew to Kieff with their wives, animals, and riches, and they gave to the Russian princes many kinds of presents and beautiful slaves, saying, "They have taken our country, to-morrow they will take yours." At these words the Russians groaned with affright, and demanded who these unknown warriors could be. (1223.) They said they were the Taetars, and in their superstition they believed that these were the very people' vanquished by Gideon, 1200 B.C., and that they were about to appear in Europe to conquer the whole world, as heralds of the day of doom. The valorous prince Galitch burned with warlike ardour to measure his strength with these new enemies. The Russians gathered a considerable army at the isle of the Normans^ on the Dnieper. Suddenly appeared the Tartar 1 "The CMldren of the East"..." They left no sustenance for Israel, neither sheep, nor ox, nor ass. For they came up with their cattle and their tents, and they came as grasshoppers for multitude ; for both they and their camels were ■without number ;- and they entered into the land to destroy it." Judges vi. 3 — 5. A concise description of this people to this day. The distance of Palestine from the deserts inhabited by roving Tartars at this day is not nearly so great as they often delighted to travel on their nomadic excursions. '■^ Varangians, or Northmen of the Baltic. 4—2 52 TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. ambassadors: "You march against us," said they; "we have done nothing to irritate you ; we only come to punish our slaves and a,ttendants. Become, then, our friends." These moderate propositions appeared to the Russian princes either a ruse or a proof of timidity. They slew the ambassadors. The Tartars sent others asking, "Is it true that you have killed our deputies? Very well then, if you wish war you shall have it ; we have done you no evil. God is the same for all peoples, it is He who shall decide our quarrels." The Russian princes were astonished at this greatness of soul displayed by the Tartars. Besieging the Russians at Kieff", without prospect of early success, the Tartars resorted to their usual treachery. The Russian princes consented to negotiate ; the Tartars swore to execute faithfully their agreement, but put every Russian to the sword. They suffocated three princes under planks over which they celebrated a feast. The Tartars acted upon a national maxim, "that the vanquished can never be the friends of the conquerors." "The whole of the south of Rus- sia trembled with affright, and the people, emitting profound groans and cries of grief, rushed into the temples : the hea- vens at this time heard their prayers." The Tartars, finding no more resistance, retired towards the east. Then Russia breathed again ; the frightful tempest was dissipated as quickly as it had arisen. "What then is this scourge which God in His anger has sent against Russia ?" demanded the people, astonished. "Whence have come these terrible strangers 1 Where have they hidden themselves ? Such secrets are known only to God and the people instructed in the art of reading books." Such was the first Tartar ava- lanche which fell upon Russia. Ancient Poem. The Battle of Koulihof. [At this epoch Russia was already enriched with many a song and well-loved legend, thanks to the lore buried in her monasteries. She had already long possessed the Song of Igor. Sophronime now celebrated the feats of Dmitri :-^ TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. 53 Brave and bold are our warrior nobles : redoubtable are our Russian cavaliers : riding on swift coursers, impenetrably armed. Their shields glow with purple and their lances glitter with gold. Heavy are their cimiters. Polish are their daggers, and Italian skill furnishes them with quivers, Ger- many, with javelins. "Well-known are all the windings of the Oka to our warriors. Eudoxia, the princess, sits at her window, locked fast in the palace with her ladies, the wives of the nobles. She follows with the piercing glance of her beautiful eyes, which shed floods of tears, the course of her well-beloved husband. She sits fondly gazing towards the south from her window, and with clasped hands she adjures the Most High : " Great God, listen to the prayer of thy humble servant. Restore to my arms the Prince Dmitri, my weU-beloved : restore him to me, radiant with glory, in the midst of his nobles. Lend him thy powerful arm to crush his enemies. Defend the Christians from the Infidels' steel. Deign to save these brave warriors. It is in Thee alone, whose eye nothing escapes, that sorrowing Russia places her confidence. I have two sons, who have no other defence than their innocence. Who shall protect them from the cold raging blast and the burning heats of summer ? my God ! let them again kiss their father, and reign in their day for long years to come . . ." The illustrious captain watches the battle-field afar, watch- man of the night, full of sagacity, Prince of Volhynia (he follows the grand Prince to foretel the fortune which awaits his country). In front is the camp of the Infidels, behind the Russians. The Prince listens, and hears loud cries and a confused tramp of mighty hosts, and the sharp caUs of the trumpets : still further he hears the roars of ferocious beasts, and the hoarse croakings of ravens : immense flights of geese and swans disturb the air with flapping wings, which seem to announce a homble tempest. " Now turn thee," said the cap- tain of the watch, " towards the camp of the Russians ; what hearest thou?" "All is calm," replied Dmitri; "I perceive only the fires of heaven, which mingle their sparMing with the brilliant aurora." The captain alights from his charger : he long lis-. 5^ TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. tens — his ear upon the earth. Then he rises and keeps silence. " Well, what now?" demands the prince. "Ah," replied the captain, " we shall have both good and bad fortune. Both armies groan: one like a widow just bereaved, the other as a young virgin, whose plaintive voice resembles the sound of the shepherd's flute. We shall triumph, Dmitri, but, alas ! victory will cost us dear." At these words the eyes of the Grand Prince filled with tears. " Yet still enveloped in a thick mist, the two armies join the battle. The Christian standards are unfurled. The charg- ers rest immoveable under their riders : the sound of our trumpets is ringing clear. The Infidel clarions sound muffled. The earth groans, from the east to the sea, and from the west to the Danube. The trampled field of battle seems to fly under the hoofs of the horsemen. The waters inundate the countries. The fatal hour has struck. Each soldier plunges his spurs into his charger and dashes onward, crying, Great God, be favourable to the Christians ! They combat, man to man, body to body. The warriors are fallen under the hoofs ; and stifled in the melde. Sanguinary flashes leap from the clashing swords. Forests of spears are shattered in the shock of battle. Majestic, like waving trees swaying in the wind, our valorous soldiers bend towards the earth. O prodigy ! The heaven opens above the legions of Dmitri, and above are seen, in the midst of a brilliant cloud, thousands of hands grasping glittering crowns ready for the conquerors Now from the ambuscade dart the concealed horsemen of Dmitri, and burst upon the Infidels, like falcons upon a flight of geese, or as panting guests rushing to the wedding-feast. Nothing resists their shock. The enemy flee, crying, " Woe to thee Mamai! thou wast in heaven. Lo, now thou art plunged into hell...."Y The Russian princes as well as the people regarded the Tartar invasions as punishment for their sins. Vasilii the blind, as he was called, during the last years of his life paid no tribute to the Tartars (1455), who were them- selves torn with civil wars, yet they often tormented the 1 Mamai was the name of the Khan of the Grim Tartars. TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. 55 Russians by sending small hordes. Achmet, the Khan of the Great Horde, also led an army, which was defeated, and peace with Kazan was concluded. Vasilii met his death in a manner which singularly depicts the barbarity of the Eussian manners. In the mistaken idea that he was threatened with consumption, he had recourse to a heroic remedy, considered efiScacious, and much in use, which consisted in scorching the whole of the body with burning amadou. Soon the sick man was covered with wounds, in which a mortal gangrene appeared. As with medical so it was with political treatment of men's lives and bodies. Princes were slain and poisoned without hesitation or proof of crime. Not only the populace drowned and burnt to death, without formalities, every one they found guilty of any crime ; not only the Russians treated their pri- soners with the utmost barbarity; but the punishment decreed by law indicated the most refined cruelty. And it was exactly at this time, when the Tartars were losing their power in Russia, that their own national instrument of torture, the Knout, was adopted by the Russians. They condemned persons of the highest distinction to this torture who happened to be accused of crime against the state — a chastisement, says the Russian narrator, so vilifying to humanity. [Ker Porter, when Russia was more obliging to inquisitive strangers than she is at present, was favoured with a precise explanation and exhibition of this Tartaric piece of devilry. We do not wish to horrify our readers with the uses to which this instrument has been applied politically by Russia, and give ■here merely the description of that English traveller. The Governor of the Kremlin at Moscow was so good as to give Sir W. Ker Porter every facility. He accordingly describes the executioner and his instrument the knout. "A man of huge herculean aspect, of a dark sallow complexion, with a determined ferocious face and black and grisly beard. His wages, 10 roubles yearly (30 shillings). On an average he then had one victim a month. " The knout is formed thus : its handle is of wood about a foot' in length, very strong and hard woven with leather. To 1 Other writers say the handle is two feet long. 56 TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. this is attax:hed a stout and weighty thong, much longer than the handle, fastened in the manner of a flail. Next comes a well-dried strip of bufFalo's hide'much like pliable horn. This the executioner puts on the knout afresh every twenty lashes. Its shape is tapering to a point, being full a quarter of an inch thick and very long. " Having adjusted this efficient part of the grand instrument of his vocation, he placed himself about four paces from where the supposed culprit was to stand, or kneel, and putting the thoDg fast between his legs, he drew it up behind him, and then seized the handle with both hands ; and stepping two paces forward, raising the terrible machine over his head, he made a straight cut down, which fell on a thick board, making a hollow deep enough to bury your finger. If he knouts every individual with the same force he did the wood, each stroke must find the bone. It is considered an abomination to touch the knout, such is the horror it inspires." (Porter, page 272.) The same writer seems to have indulged a vehement curiosity to witness the infliction of this instrument of torture upon a condemned criminal. "A wretch, who, goaded by the cruelty and penuriousness of his master, the Count of , not only to himself, but to the rest of his slaves, of stolid features, possessing not one trait in his face capable of suggesting murder, meekness and harmlessness being unmistakeably pro- nounced in his physiognomy, this man was condemned to the knout without mercy, and exiled to Siberia if he survived the hellish ordeal. He was paraded by the police before the populace. At the place of execution, he was secured, neck, arms, body, and .legs by straps, to a strong block of wood. This constrained him to bow forwards. The awful moment was at hand. The first, and each repeated stroke, tore the flesh from the bone. A few seconds interval. During the first twelve the sufferer roared most terribly: faint and sick the cry died away. Nothing soon was heard but the bloody splash of the knout... Oh, if God punished so, who could stand before his judgment-seat ?... A full hour was occupied. More than two hundred strokes were given to him. Not the smallest spark of life seemed to remain. The executioner took the pale and lifeless body by the beard. An instrument with ii'on TARI'ARDOM IN RUSSIA. 57 teeth was placed below his temple. It was struck with the utmost force : and the pointed fangs driven into the flesh. The 'opposite temple and forehead received the same appli- cation. The parts thus pierced were then rubbed with gun- powder, to remain a perpetual brand. Still yet one more punishment was in store. The nose was deprived of both nostrils by pincers, like immense curling irons. The acuteness of this last torture, tearing the parts from his head in tlie most shocking manner, brought back sense to the torpid body. What was my horror to see the writhings of the poor mangled creature ! He arose and walked to his prison by assistance. From whence, unless death supervened, to be conveyed im- mediately to Siberia ! " (Ker Porter, Travelling Sketches in Russia.) " In the time of the early Tsars the performers of this ancient rite were the objects of respect. The great Dukes of Muscovy frequently became amateurs in the performance. A permanent performer, when Letters and Humanity kissed each other, became difficult of engagement, and a law was passed to give an agreeable occupation as an inheritance to the last purchaser for ever. But assuredly the knout, as an estate, is by no means improvable In case the male progeny fails, the corporation of butchers are to be called upon in- stantly. ..Thus I have seen it... If your dreams be but half as much disturbed by the recital, as mine were by the sight, I have broken your rest for a night or two at least." (Ker Porter.) The Plitt is now substituted for the knout. Rods also and sticks : rods are used for hundreds of strokes, sticks for scores; but the plitt.can be made equally fatal, as also the rod. It is an instrument very similar to the knout, but not quite so heavy. It kills more slowly. The knout is abolished, but the pKtt is nearly as severe; and running the gauntlet, Siberian mines, or simple banish- ment to these intensely cold regions, where the mortality per annum is admitted to be great, are all still in force. The Rod, when several hundred strokes are administered, is almost as severe as human nature can survive, especially when in- flicted upon bared female forms. 58 TARTARBOM IX RUSSIA. As the proceedings iu the courts are carried on only in writing, which of necessity leads to venality, delay, gorging of the prisons, and innumerable vexatiqns ; there is with the bribing system, one law for the rich, and almost no law for the poor.] The Mongol Tartars. From 1223 to 1554i the Russians were ground down under Tartar yoke. It was then that Ivan IV., the Terrible, destroyed the power of the Kiptchaks or GoLDEN HoBDE of the Kalmucks, pursued them to Kazan and Astrakan, and for ever annihilated the Tartar supremacy. Thenceforward the Kalmuck Tartars sank from being lords to tributaries. " Their physiognomy still bespeaks the Tartar blood. The strong line of their eye- bone is far more perpendicular than that of the Chinese. Hence we must suppose that if Zenghis Khan and the renowned Tamerlane resemble their descendants, that Venus here shewed her old enmity against the warlike in the person of her favour- ites, and while the one was blessed with the courage of Mars, the other was cursed with the aspect of Vulcan. So much for the Tartarian heroes\" In many parts of Russia the peculiar features of the mix- ture of the Tartar with the Russian blood are still plainly distinguishable. The horror excited by the deeds of the Mongols gave rise to some strange beliefs respecting them. Vincent of Beauvais tells us that, before Batu invaded, he sacrificed to the demons. One lived in an idol, addressed him, and bade him march on hopefully, saying that he would send three spirits before him, against whom his enemies should not be able to stand. And that this came to pass, the three spirits being the spirit of discord, the spirit of distrust, and the spirit of fear. Ivo of Narbonne has this marvellous account: "that the Mongolian princes who had dogs' heads, ate the bodies of the dead, leaving only the bones for the vultures, which foul birds however despised and rejected these remnants.'' Von Hammer says : 1 Sir W. Ker Porter. TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. 59 " We may enumerate their virtues by those of the animals of their Zodiac, which ran thus : — mouse, ox, panther, hare, serpent, dragon, horse, sheep, ape, hen, dog, pig. Thievish as mice, Strong as oxen, Fierce as panthers, Cautious as hares, Artful as serpents. Frightful as dragons, Mettlesome as horses, Obedient as sheej], Loving their offspring as apes. Domestic as hens, Faithful as dogs, Unclean as swine!' The manners of these Mongols almost pass belief. Ogotai, one of the greatest monarchs the world has ever seen, the son of Zenghis Khan, had heard that a khan of one of his tribes meant to marry their daughters to another tribe. Ogotai ordered all the girls married that year to be ranged in a row. Having picked out the fairest for his own harem, he sent the others to the public " establishments \" The most peculiar part of the story is that none of the girls' relations opposed the slightest obstacle to this odd arrangement. There were 4000 girls to be disposed of The Mongols took Khiva in 1220, fired its buildings with naphtha, sent 100,000 of the artizans into Tartary, opened the dykes of the Oxus and submerged the city; used all prisoners to serve the catapults on a huge platform, and made them bear the whole brunt of the fight; killed all the soldiers, and en- slaved the women and children. A specimen of Mongol warfare is given as follows: "The Mongols had a chief killed before Nessa; they took it by catapults and storming. The inhabitants were all ordered to evacuate the city and lie down in pairs, they were then bound together with cords, and 70,000 were shot to death with arrows. At another place, Meru, called the king of the world, was besieged by the Mongols; after un- successful sorties the governor visited the camp, was loaded with presents, and asked to send the chiefs and his friends. They were all slaughtered. The Mongols entered, the people were 1 The History nf the Mongols, by Howorth, p. 160. London, 1876. 6o TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. ordered to defile out, which took four days." One author says, "After the slaughter 1,300,000 corpses," and another, that "700,000, were counted," At another place, Nishapoor, the Mongols accumulated 3000 ballisters, 300 catapults, 700 machines for throwing naphtha, 2,500 loads of stones; 10,000 men led the storming party through a great mauy breaches.. To prevent the living hiding among the dead, every head, of man, woman, and child, was cut off. According to Markhoud, 1,747,000 lost their lives in this massacre. At Herat, 1,600,000 people were destroyed. Zenghis Khan preserved several superstitions in his code of laws. It was forbidden to have a chair, to wash the hands in running water, and forbidden to wash clothes, which were to be used till worn out. Cooking utensils were denied ablution, and this custom still prevails among the Calmucks. Carpini says they would not touch fire with a knife, or take their food with it out of a kettle. In killing an animal it must be laid out on its back, the body opened and the heart torn out or squeezed with the hand: the Kalmucks still attribute this practice to Zenghis. Another rule was, that those who killed animals in the Mussulman way must be killed themselves. The Mongols were avaricious to the last degree, and only killed animals that were sick or wounded. " It may be," says Ho worth, " that he and his followers tramped over the fairest portions of the earth with the faggot and the sword in their hands, forestalling terribly the day of doom His creed was to sweep away all cities, as the haunts of slavery and luxury, that his herds might freely feed upon grass whose green was free from dusty feet! It does make one hide his face in terror to read that 18,470,000 people perished in China and Tangut alone at the hands of Zinghis and his followers. The scourges of God seem inevitably to recur at intervals, to purge the world of the diseased and the decaying, the weak and the false, the worn out and the biased, the fool and the inave. The pelican and the stork watch over the ruins of Mesopotamia, and a hundred other sites are witnesses of our conclusion; grim witnesses, too, of the truth that 'blood and iron' is neither a new creed nor invented by Zinghis Khan. It may be that in his hands we see the steel TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. 6i more bright and keen, and that he did not hide his work under the fantastic guise that he was the champion of freedom or of some other fine-sounding pretence." The Mongols were bound by no oath ; and however solemnly sworn to the besieged, it was broken without scruple, and a general massacre ensued. They desired to leave no enemies behind. "They gloried in the slaughter of men: blood to them was spilt as freely as water. They employed lies and deception to delude their victims." Having laid waste a wide circle of country round their camp, they gave themselves up to excess and debauchery: waited upon by their young and beautiful captives, one of whom was chosen before his death by each warrior to be buried alive with him. As the hard and dangerous work was done by the prisoners and captives, the lordly Mongols easily kept up their strength in the most distant expeditions. The idea of happiness to this great Mongol chief was thus described: "The greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies, to chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth, to see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses, and to clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters'." The following account of the great Mongol winter-hunt is not without a significant interest. "It was more like a military expedition than anything else." Orders were given to the different tribes, a month's journey off, to extend themselves and form a huge ring, enclosing the prey: their human game was gradually driven into a kind of battue, enclosing, by felt hung on cords, a circuit of two or three leagues. The Khan first entered the ring with his wives and suite, who when tired of the slaughter retired to an eminence to watch the great chieftains htint. The whole concluded by a general rush of the troops at the remainder. When only a few old men were left they begged of the Mongols that their lives might be spared for another season. Eight days were generally consumed in this national sport, celebrated once a year. The Mongols captured Herat, and for a whole week ceased not to kill, burn, and destroy, and it is said that 1,600,000 ' H. H. Howorth, F.E.G.S. Hiitory nf the Mongols, p. 110, 1876. 62 TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. people were killed. The place was so entirely depopulated that it became a desert. The Mongols then retired. Soon afterwards they sent back 2000 troops to seek out and destroy any that had hidden, and so escaped the massacre. After their final departure, forty persons, the miserable remnant of the once teeming population, assembled in the great Mosque (Wolff, p. 94). The great cause of their successes was the terror inspired by their brutal atrocities and universal slaughters. The pro- vinces of Khorassan and Irak, after repeated Tartar invasions, did not contain one thousandth part of their old inhabitants'; the population, the writer thought, would not reach its former numbers before the day of doom. Their savagery caused the Greeks to say "these Mongols had dogs' heads, and lived on human flesh." Cabnuck Tartars. In the southern, and south-eastern parts of Russia, the inhabitants shew all the varieties of the Asiatic type, whether Turks, Persians, Indians, or Chinese ; together with every shade and tint of complexion, and form of feature, which so sharply mark the different races of the Calmucks and Tartars. In 1768 the Calmucks extended from Astrachan to the lake Baikal: and defended a Russian frontier of 1500 miles, against the Kubans, Karakalpacs, Usbegs, and Kirghiz Tartars. The term Tartar was then used to denote the whole of the in- habitants who were not Christians, in Siberia, Kazan, and eastern Russia, up to Kamtschatka. The Calmuck Tartars are some of the best disciplined troops in the Russian service. They sprang from the Huns, who overwhelmed the neighbouring nations of Russia, long after their ancestors had subverted the Roman Empire. Their ancient seat, for ages, was Mongolia, and thence marching in battle array, they mingled with the races reaching to the Oural and Caspian, and in course of time, by associa- tion and cohabitation, lost their primaeval characters ; incor- 1 Paohymerea, i. 87, quoted hy H. H. Howortli, P.B.G.S. TARTARDOM IN liUSSIA. 6 J porating themselves with Turkomans, Sarmatian and Scythian swarms, in the classical region of Ararat. After returning to subdue China, Bukaria, and Persia, by an ebbing flow of an im- mense westward wave, they, found Russia divided against itself, an easy spoil. The Russians in vain groaned under this Cal- muck Tartar oppression, till rescued finally by the arm of Ivan the Terrible. So sank the Tartar glories : they paid, instead of receiving, Russian tribute. In Ker Porter's time a corps of this ancient warrior horde passed before him in all their native aspect of dark ferocity. Baskirs. Anciently dwelling on the Kama, the Baskirs are a people that united with the Tartar hordes. The meaning of the term (Baskeer) is Wolf, so-called from their dexterity at plunder. It is said they are derived from Tartar blood. They live in the Ural mountains. Formerly roaming over southern Siberia, to avoid the tyranny of its khans, they settled on the Kazanian khanate, and preferred allegiance to the Tsar, Ivan II., and the reward of his protection. In 1770 they were 27,000 families, living in huts in winter, and tents in summer. Their language is a Tartar dialect, their religion Mahometan. Another tribe of Russian horse are the Kirghizes, the ancient enemies of the Baskirs ; yet under the firm protec- tion of Russia they march against a common foe. Their terri- tories extend from the Ural to the Caspian, and even far away to the east, almost to the wall of China. In appearance their countenance greatly resembles the dwellers in the Celestial Empire. Ker Porter thus describes them. " As this strange people marched forward, I was struck by their appearance, so peculiar, grand, and picturesque. I seemed to b§ viewing the armies of Zinghis Khan, or Tamerlane !... The men were cased in shirts of mail, with shining helmets (surmounted with a spike), and armed with long pikes, adorned at the top with various coloured pennons. Their other weapons were swords, bows and arrows. 64 TARTARDOM IX RUSSIA. Their dexterity at shooting is amazing. This little army was led by two chiefs. A bright coat of mail covered their body to the middle of the thigh. A well-constructed helmet covered the head, accompanied by an ingenious protection for the neck. A scarlet kaftan bung from their shoulders down on the backs of tbe finest Persian horses I ever beheld. These and the leopard skins, sbubrach, or saddle-covering, gave magni- ficence to their appearance." " The Kirghises now marched past their ancient enemies the Bakshirs. This race once held the Chinese in awe. Their territories extend from the river Oural and the Caspian Sea to the great Wall of China." The Cossacks of Zaporavia. They consist of a mixed crowd of persons of all nations, who live in a singular sort of society, to whicb no women are admitted; they are a sort of male Amazons, who, at a particular season of the year, resort to certain islands of the Dnieper in their neigh- bourhood, where they rendezvous with the women dependent on them : on these occasions the union of the sexes is by no means regulated by those laws which prevail in other societies. The children born from these indiscriminate unions are left with their mothers till a certain age, at which the males are delivered to their fathers, and, like their fathers, become hunters and warriors, whilst the females remain with those of their own sex. All the Cossacks profess the Greek re- ligion, and serve as irregulars in tbe Russian army'. The Cossacks have played a most important part in the fortunes of Russia. Wandering from the regions of the Caspian sea, and infesting the Black Sea, they subsisted by piracy, ravage, and plunder. Combining the qualities of seamen and soldiers, they became formidable enemies. Batori, king of Poland, attached them to his interests, and gave them, land and privileges in the Ukraine. But his successors, less prudent, by attempting their subjugation lost their friendship : they fled in ' An Account of Russia, (by the Earl of M'Cartney), p. 33. TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. 65 vast numbers to the banks of the Don and Volga. Still harassed by the imprudent Poles, they sought aid from Moscow. From that time forward they have continued most firmly attached to the Eussian power. The sagacious Peter retained their faithful services on the lightest conditions — protection without tribute and election of their own Hetman, but readiness to serve when required. This was, of all other inducements, that which exactly suited the genius of these brilliant horsemen. Pagans under Poland, they are Christians under Russia. Although their name comes to them from a Tartar tribe, which was to be found at the foot of the Caucasus a thousand years ago, the Cossacks are mainly of Russian blood, dashed indeed with that of Turks, Poles, Serbs and Tartars : they are members of the old faith, or Slavovirtze, belonging to the Greek and not the Russian Church.- Peter abolished the Patriarchate, and neither persecution nor concession can make them conform to the Imperial State Church. They hold to ancient customs, not in religion only, but in all things. Great have been the services of the Cossacks from the time of Yermak. But even these may be pressed too far. Maurice Wagner, in his work on the Caucasus, utters a few words of warning to Europe in the name of a Sclave writer : — " We Slaaves are bound to give to our brethren in the West a warning of the highest importance. The West is too oblivious of the North of Europe and Asia, the home of rapacious and destructive races. Let it not be sup- posed these nations have ceased to exist. Like clouds charged with storms, they are awaiting but the all-powerful command to advance and desolate Europe. Let it not be thought that the spirit which animated Attila, Zenghis Khan and Tamerlane, those scourges of mankind, is extinct'." " In a night of stomj I have seen a form, and the figure was a giant, And his eye was bent on the Cossack's tent, and his look was all defiant. Kingly his crcst^^and towards the West with his hattle-ase he pointed. And the form I saw was Attila, of this earth the Scourge anointed." Deserters, outlaws, peasants flying from the tyranny of ■^ " The Emperor (Nicholas) is reported to say that the war is not yet begun in earnest, and that sooner or later we shall see him at the head of his armies scattering the nations before him like another Attila." The Times, 1854. E. 5 66 TARTARDOM IX RUSSIA. their masters, brave and adventurous spirits of every sort, who could not find room for themselves in Russia, joined the tribes living on the Don, and made up the community which soon became known as the " Cossacks of the Don." The name really means in the Tartar-Turkish language a vagabond, and thus a partisan or guerilla. Kazok is another Russian name (Schuyler, p. 10). Since these pages have been written, a striking confirma- tion of the potent action of the Tartar rule upon Russian life has been observed in the article by Professor Gregorief of St Petersburg, some of which is here quoted from Schuyler. " There was a time when orthodox Russia seemed thoroughly Tartar. Everythiag in it, except its religion, was permeated and impregnated with Tartardom. It was permeated and im- pregnated then by Tartardom in the same degree, if not more so, as it is now by the ideas of Western Europe; and as European ideas, which have already for a century and a half affected the higher and more influential classes of the Russian people, are the weaker as their influence extends to the lower and poorer classes, so especially the top and branches of the Russian tree, but the root and trunk less. And not only in externals — in dress, manners, and habits of life— did the Russian princes and boyards, the Russian officials and mer- chants imitate the Tartars ; but everything — their feelings, their ideas, and their aspirations in the region of practical life were in the strongest way influenced by Tartardom. Our ancestors received this Tartar influence during 200 years — at first from an unwilling, but afterward from an habitual conformity to the tone, the manners and the morals that reigned at Sarai on the Volga, which in its time played in relation to us the same rSle that subsequently fell to the lot of Paris. Russia con- tinued to seem Tartar even after the fall of the Golden Horde. "During the continuance of the whole Moscow period, up to the very time of Peter the Great, the statecraft and the political management of the Russian Tsars and magnates con- tinued to be in every respect Tartar; so that without an acquaintance with real Tartardom it is impossible correctly to understand and estimate many phases in Russian history TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. 67 Thanks to having identified themselves in such a way with Tartardom, our ancestors succeeded in freeing themselves from the Tartar yoke. It was in consequence of their complete acquaintance with Tartardom that the rulers of Moscow were ahle to carry on their affairs in relation to it as skilfully as they did after the fall of the Golden Horde. The Tsars and their counsellors understood what they wanted, calling into their service those distinguished men of the Horde, who for some reason or other did not get on well at home. By means of these immigrants, who appeared accompanied by a greater or smaller number of followers, the Muscovite Grand Princes and Tsars obtained first an excellent military force, which they used against their enemies as well on the east as on the west of Russia ; and secondly, an excellent support against their own selfish and disobediently disposed hereditary boyards If not in the first as usual, at least in the second generation, the Tartar immigrants into Russia became orthodox, and entering then into the flesh and blood of the Russian people, strengthened instead of weakened the empire, which was then in course of foundation. But as it was impossible to turn every useful and valuable Tartar into a Christian, and as the unavoidable per- spective of becoming christianized in Russia might have served as a preventive to this permanent or temporary injmigration, a clever method was found of getting out of this dilemma. " There was founded within the boundaries of Russia a special Khanate, where the useful immigrants fronj the Horde might remain Mussulmans without injury to their true and faithful services to our political interests — the Khanate, or as it was called the Kingdom of Kasimof, which during two hundred years successfully performed the functions allotted to it." The Mongols ^ or Mongol Tartars, were known to Chinese history (618 — 907). They used grass for saddles, pig-skins for beds, small pieces of wood for calendars, lived principally on fish, made clothes of fish-skins, wore caps of fox and badger skins. A Chinese account of the Royal house of the Mongols gives the legend, that its ancestor was a sky-blue wolf. This ' The Mongols derive their name from Moug, which denotes a hold, daring, brave man. 68 TAETARDOM IN RUSSIA. ■wolf married a white and savage bitch named Goa Masai. Goa means lady in Mongol. A child, whose hands and feet had been cut off in a massacre, having been nourished by a wolf, m remembrance of this they bore wolf-heads on their standards (Howorth). The Mongols are almost always named Tartars iu the Eussian accounts. There were many nations of them, and their immense territories went by the designation of Grand Tartary. Cossack Superstition. In the year 1714 the King of Persia sent a present to the Princess Sophia of an elephant which some Armenians had conducted from Astrakan, who related that the inhabitants there on its arrival had adored that animal, and that several hundreds of them worshipped it so much as to follow it along the road above a hundred miles\ " The Cham of the grim Tartars invaded Russia with 400,000 men, beseiged the Imperial City of Mosco three months, burnt and spoiled the Country many hundred miles in compass and on his departure, he required Homage of the Emperour ; which was, That the Emperour of Russia should come forth of the city of Mosco on foot, attended by his Princes and Nobles of Russia, bare headed ; and that the Emperour should then bring Oats in his Cap, and present them to the Cham of Tartary his horse (he himself then sitting upon his horse-back), and to feed the horse out of his cap ; AU which, for the saving of the lives of many thousands of his people, and utter devastation of his Empire, the Emperour performed, feeding the great Cham of Tartary's horse with Oats out of his own Cap or Colpack, "This Homage being performed, the Cham of Tartary streaked the Emperour of Russia three times on his face and beard, presented him with a Cymiter and a Bowe and Case of Arrows and so departed carrying many thousands Captive ^" 1 Memoirei pour servir a I'Histoire de VEwipire Bussien. Par un Ministre etranger. A La Haye. 1725. = Empire of Russia. By J. F. 1684. TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. 69 Modern Cossacks. "Through the kindness of the officer in command of the Grand Ducal Oossack body-guard, I witnessed a truly novel equestrian expedition. After being paraded, the men, about sixty in number, mounted on strong ugly little horses, were ordered to perform a sham skirmish. Forming themselves into two camps, each combatant attacked his opponent, on his own hook, and after his own fashion. Here was a feUow, standing bolt upright up in his saddle, and discharging his musket at another, who, hanging pendant by his legs, returned fire from underneath his horse's belly : then a couple, clinging like cats to the flanks and ribs of their chargers, and thus completely sheltering their own bodies, watched a favourable moment of pinking each other, though to me they almost appeared like a couple of riderless horses ; whilst others flattened themselves at full length on their beasts' backs, and manoeuvred for the chance of some unguarded movement on the part of their foes. All this at full gallop, accompanied by a good deal of screaming and yelling. Other feats were then performed. Galloping with the head downwards in the saddle and the body and legs erect in the air seemed a favourite one; still more so picking up a stone or even a coin at the same pace, the performer holding on the while to his saddle by his feet. A couple of hours of this sort of work seemed to be enough for horse and man ; so, closing up into a column four deep, the Cossacks marched home, singing in remarkably good time a native chorus, with an accompaniment of two kettle-drums. They are first-rate irregular cavalry these Cossacks, strong, well-built fellows, and active as cats Instead of boots they wear a species of buskin of very pliable leather, reaching to the knee ; and in the place of soles a pair of mocassins of the same material, fitting like a glove, and leaving the foot in perfect freedom'." ' Journey through the Caucasus to Persia. By A. H. Mounsey, F.E.G.S. 1871. 70 TARTARDOM IN RUSSIA. The Tartars may perhaps be considered the most wonderful race in history as regards their peculiar hardihood, endurance, independence of stores and of weather, cold, heat and drought. Able to sit days and nights on horseback, capable of subsisting on nothing but mare's milk and such game as they can kill on their journeys, provided with everything they require ; their clothing a coat of buffalo or other hide, their horses content with the grass of the plains, carrying neither straw, oats nor fodder — a Tartar prince goes forth to war with such cavalry as no other nation can produce, and 100,000 horse forms his corps called a tuc. In case of need, they can ride ten days on end without lighting a fire, ©r taking a regular meal. They have dried milk, which dissolved in water serves them at once with both food and drink, so as he rides along he can prepare his dainty dinner ! The Tartars double and double again, and wheel round in an instant, and have won many a fight by these tactics. When in want of food they bleed their horses and suck the veins. If they need anything more solid than the milk paste, they put a sheep's pudding full of blood under the saddle, and in time it gets coagulated and cooked by the heat and then they devour it (Georg Pachymeres, V. 4). Botero had "heard from a trustworthy source that a Tartar of Perekop, travelling on the Steppes, lived for some days on the blood of his horse, and not daring to bleed it more, cut off and ate its ears " (Eelasione Vhivers., p. 93). Another account brought by the spies of the Sultan of Khwarizin when first menaced by Zhinghis Khan was^" The army of Zhinghis is countless as a swarm of ants or locusts. Their warriors are matchless in lion-like valour, in obedience and endurance. They take no rest, and flight or retreat is unknown to them. . . . They will open a horse's vein, draw blood and drink it. In victory they leave neither small nor great alive \" The Golden H