CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Economized Commercial Spelling BY iffiNRY HOLT LL.D., F.A.A.S. MEMBER OF THf: EXifeuTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE SIMPLIFIED SPELLING BOARD REPRINTED, WITH AMENDMENTS AMD ADDITIONS, FROM THE UNPOPULAR REVIEW FOR October-December, 1915 NEW YORK THE UNPOPULAR REVIEW 1916 The Unpopular Review Ji specimen copy sent subject to return or payment This Review holds that the principal hope for humanity is in the progress in knowledge, intelligence and character of the less capable portion of mankind; that only through such progress can real advance be made in their fortunes; and that at present the main obstacle to such progress is in the fallacies and false hopes preached by demagogues to attract the crowd. The chief recent schemes of our demagogues, — the make-e very body-rich juggles with the currency, and the movement to consign to the ignorant masses the functions of the learned judicial^ — are exploded, but other demagogues and other schemes will arise. The in- telligence and conscience of the country need rallying points to oppose them. It is hoped to m^ke this Review one among such rallying points. Struck by the war before the appearance of its third number, with the consequent limiting of new subscriptions, and call of attention from its main purposes. The Unpopular Review has nevertheless been steadily growing. While making no assertions itself, it is constantly receiving assertions that it is the best American periodical. It does not doubt, however, that other periodicals receive the same assurances. Yet it is not without hope that its share of them indicates its having in its short career reached a position, at least, among the best. There are those who have the temerity to say that this age is scattering its brains over daily papers and other rapid-fire periodicals until it has very little concentrated brain power left. If they speak truth, the revival of the Quarterly is greatly needed. From Lord Bryce: "The whole Review is, so to speak, almost too good for a serial. There is matter in it for the making of books of permanent value. . . . What strikes me most in it all through is that it is fresh, not hackneyed or conventional, and that it is full of thinking, written not because something has to be said, but because the writers have something to say." From Prof. A. S. Johnson, Cornell: "If anybody had told me, a year ago, that we should have, in this country, a magazine as good as this, I'd have spurned him as a false prophet." From Prof. William Lyon Phelfs, Yale: "I am enjoying The Unpopular Review im- mensely, and greatly admire it; it is a proof that wit, originality, and charm may all be successfully employed on the side of the angels." From Professor Paul Shorey, Chicago: "I read with interest a larger proportion of The Un- popular Review, I think, than of any other periodical." From Mr. William Morton Payne, The Dial: "i^o reading gives me more delight in this time of intellectual disintegration." From Mr. Frank Foxcroft, The Living Age: "The only 'out' about it is that it somerimes cr -ates discord between the two heads of the family over the question which shall have the first reading of it." From The Nation: "Solid substance and brilliant execution. ... To such a quarterly the Nation extends the right hand of fellowship." From American Review of Revietos: "An instant and deserved success." From London Times: "The Unpopular Review, ... is welcomed here." 75 c. a number ^'-^fc'^^'*'''" $2.50 a year Address THE UNPOPULAR REVIEW »"ff„??l^^:'U"e'Srt LONDON: WILLIAMS AND NORGATC Readers interested in promoting the work The Review attempts, can do so by sending to the publishers names and addresses of persons likely to be interested in it. SOME NEW WORDS, AND SOME EARLIER , FROM OUR R EADERS "How anybody who has a taste for reading worth while, can fail to ap- preciate it is beyond my comprehension." "One magazine, at any rate, for which I am more than willing to write a check when my subscription falls due." "Who said there could be nothing new under the sun.? He never read the Unpop! ... It makes most everything else sound so wordy and opaque and muddleheaded!" "A delight to me since the first issue and gets better with each succeeding number." "It fills the bill for ideas without accumulation of words. And the nail gets hit every time. I take nothing else." " It has a way of serving food for reflection with a piquant sauce alto- gether unique." "Fine both in subject-matter and subject-manner — pleasant to the eye — pleasant to the literary taste, calculated to make one wise." "On the frontier of progress but really conservative of some of our best, though somewhat overshadowed, ideals." "For the last twenty-five years I have wished that such a thing were possible and believed that it could not be done in this country." "It is so refreshing to have the truth told without apologizing for it in some way." "I especially commend the omission of the names of the authors, since it forces the reader to judge the article by its worth, and not by the reputa- tion of the writer." "You are attacking in a systematic manner, the superstitions and hypoc- risies that I have been fighting, in my own poor way for 30 years." "Never before have I seen so many stimulating, sound, and suggestive articles gathered together by a single editor." "The best brain food I have had the pleasure of reading." "Delicious! I want to lend it to everybody at once." "Keep up the good work. . . . We would all be much better off if we could learn to face the disagreeable truth." "My feeling for The Unpopular Review is something more than appreciation: it is pride." "All would-be and so-called reformers should be required by the board of public safety to take a course of reading in The Unpopular Review." "The Review certainly contains the greatest amount of clear, logical writing that was ever published within such covers." "It is like a breath of fresh air in a fog of sentimentalism." 75 cents a number, ^2.50 a year. Bound volumes $2. each, two a year. (Canadian J2.6f , Foreign $2.75.) For the present, subscribers can have any back number or numbers addi- tional to those subscribed for in advance, for 50 cents each (plus 4 cents postage to Canada, 7 cents Foreign countries) the whole amount to be paid direct to the publishers at the time of the subscription. Address THE UNPOPULAR REVIEW 3s"^?l??^"?E^T.^'S[r. LONDON : WILUAMS AND NORGATE Readers interested in promoting the work Tbe Review attempts, can do so by sending to the pubUskers names and addresses of persons likely to be interested in it. 55885b Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924031423639 ECONOMIZED COMMERCIAL SPELLING In these days of efficiency, Spelling is badly behindhand. True, commercial correspondence has many abbrevia- tions that are generally accepted in spite of being more or less arbitrary: for instance a/c, acct, amt, Dr, Cr, mdse, etc. But the economies effected by these abbreviations could be increased probably a hundred fold, and that too without excessive condensations like those cited, which do not result in words, but in mere unpronounceable symbols. For hosts of words there is entirely practicable much con- densation that would be systematic, have the warrant of authority, and leave them more readily and reasonably spellable and pronounceable than before. This could be effected by simply applying to them the principles ad- vocated by the Simplified Spelling Board of America and the similar Society of England. In writing letters making no especial appeal to the feel- ings or the reason, the present writer has found so much saving of time and tissue in using some of the abbreviations recommended by those authorities, and a few of his own devising, that it has seemed worth while to put them within reach of others. A more important consideration for doing so, however, has been the economies that use of them could effect in business offices. The still greater economies, amounting probably to hundreds of millions annually, that would result from a general use of rational- ized English spelling in writing and printing, and also the saving in the time required for learning the language by children and foreigners, are only incidental to our present consideration but it may be worth while to state, in pass- ing, that writing and printing the utterly superfluous o in you costs the English speaking world millions of dollars every year; and that the same is true, in less degree, of the still greater absurdity of spelling the word tu as too and two. I 2 Economized Commercial Spelling It would be cruel materially to disturb in the literature of any generation the verbal forms people are used to. But it is more cruel to inflict on children and their teachers the present English spelling. Fortunately, however, there is no real necessity for either cruelty. The present generation can be accustomed to better forms through ordinary business correspondence and ad- vertising; and also to the idea of bringing up their children to find better forms natural in literature and in correspond- ence of moment. This idea should be peculiarly welcome, because it will save children many tears and much time — estimated by some as high as two years — now wasted over our inconsistent spelling. If they are taught rational and consistent forms, they will also become accustomed to the current forms without conscious effort. We do not recommend the use of new forms where they would divert attention from argument or from address to the feelings; but in routine business, advertis- ing, and commonplace matter generally, many new forms can be used without harm, and with much economy; and as they become familiar in such uses, or are made familiar in simplified, rationalized, and greatly facilitated educa- tion of children, they can work into higher uses with many great gains and no appreciable losses. The American Board has recommended several ex- cellent improvements, but has not attempted to reduce our spelling to a system. The English society has made such an attempt, many of whose features correspond with the work of the American Board; and many more, but not all, which the American Board has not formally adopted, are approved by the majority of its mem- bers. If this debatable ground is ever to be put in order, it will probably be by the efforts of individuals, most of the efforts going to waste, and those most fit, surviving. The following recommendations are condensed from Economized Commercial Spelling 3 the publications of the Simplified Spelling Board, and are concurred in by the English Simplified Spelling Society. I. Drop all useless or misleading letters. For instance (a) e is useless in such words as servy curv, carv, tzvelv, selvs, involv, axl, t^c. (b) e is both useless and misleading at the end of such words as engin, infinit, activ, futil, examin, i^c, as its normal use in such cases has been to make the preceding vowel long. Hence it should be retaind in such words as fine, finite, note, hate, l^c, unless rules IX-XV are followed. (c) e is useless and misleading when ed final is pro- nounced as 5. Then write that simply d. When it is pronounced as t write it simply t. As aimd, armd, raind, dipt, stept, tvisht, &c. But when the final e aflFects the preceding vowel [see rule (b) above] the e must be retaind. Bakt, for baked will hardly do, nor dind for dined, nor deduct for deduced, l^c. (d) One letter or the other is useless in the combina- tion ea, sounded as in head or heart. Use the letter which is sounded, and omit the other, as hed, ired, ment, helth, relm, led, dred, hart, harth, harken, i^c. (e) Silent b, h, I, n, r, s and w, are always useless. Omit them in det, lam, thtim, sutl, gost, gastly, hym, condem, pur, bur, er, coud, ivoud. He, Hand, aile, rite, ritten, anser, i^c. (f) Except to mark the difference between at and all, use one / instead of two, as til, wil, Jul, fil, skil, skilful, wilful, instil, fulfil, fulness, dulness, l^c. (g) Drop final ue except when the preceding vowel is long, as in catalog, dialog, leag, harang, l^c, but not in vogue, vague, rogue, i^c. Change tongue to tung, Milton's way. (h) Omit te from ette final, as quartet, coquet, cigaret, omelet, l^c. (i) Substitute e for the difthongs ae ee, oe oe, as era, medieval, fenix, cyclopedia, subpena, maneuver, l^c. II. Change ph to / when so sounded, as alfabet, foto- graf, cifer, telefone, filosofy. 4 Economized Commercial Spelling III. In the termination ce use s for f, as defense, pre- tense, offense, i^c. This helps in the inflection of verbs under I (c), as advanst, entranst, not advanct, entranct. IV. For ough or augh substitute o, or u, or au, ow, ac- cording to the sound, as tho, boro, thru, ruf, cauf, baut, plow, yc. V. When z is the sound, use that letter instead of s, as iz, advize, abuze, civilize, cloze (verb), criticize, rize, l^c. VI. For final re or onr substitute er, or or, as theater, niter, color, favor, ISc. VII. When ice is pronounced is, spel it so, as notis, justis, servis, averis, lattis, l^c. VIII. Use y only as initial to words and terminal to syllables, elsewhere use i: y is really a superfluous letter, but it is too well established to throw over yet. Biuty, viu, not byuty and vyu as the English society would have them, but trying, flyer, as now. Our bay, day, i^c, ar simply the bai and dai of rule XI below, as the English Society applies it. The Board seems to have concluded that, in the fore- going, it has agreed upon about all the points that it can afford time and tissue to discuss, and that its future work will be principally to propagate what has been done, and to encourage the later intelligent efforts of individual re- formers. The following additional recommendations from an in- dividual would-be reformer who has been a member of the executive committee of the Simplified Spelling Board from the beginning, are to some extent approved by his colleagues (though not by all) and by the English Society. He wishes to emphasize that he speaks for the societies only in the cases specially indicated, and that the rest are recommended solely on his personal responsibility. IX. Carry into all the vowels the principle of doubling already practised in e and (with a few foreign words Economized Commercial Spelling 5 like bazaar) in a, and in the o of door and floor, and recom- mended by the English Society for u — e. g., the spelling of fruit as fruut. Thus the only absolute novelty proposed by us in the simple long vowels, would be illustrated in briit, Hit, niit. This would, among many benefits, save a letter in each of the large number of ight words. It would also stop the orgy of absurdity in the use of o and u: we now habitually use double o to express long u, as in loose and (most appropriately) fool. Perhaps the most absurd spelling in the language is that of the verb to lose which in speech we make rime with snooze, but which in reason rimes with the preposition close. The English Simplified Spelling Society's suggestions, with which, in this case, we heartily concur, would make it luuz. X. It is needless to double a long vowel at the end of a syllable, or before another vowel, or to double a before r. In a very few cases, however, where ar is preceded by zv (or by q which is merely cw) au should be used, as in war = zvaur, quarter =quaurter. (See suggestion XVI.) XI. Spell the long a in bail, fail, hail, etc., the same way thi'oughout the language, baik, caik, draik, If^c. This is the English society's recommendation. XII. Resolve the chaos in some other long vowel sounds represented in found, and cow and could and tvood, by invariably using ow for the vowel in found, and keeping ou for that in could and wood, thus spelling sownd, fownd and coud and woud. See I (e). XIII. The similar chaos in haul, lord, awful, etc., the English Society wisely proposes to settle by au. XIV. Don't separ^tp- the symbols expressing a sound. Get the vowel sym|5ols together instead of separating them by a consonant^ This holds with all the vowels — fait iorfate, ceed for cede, biit for bite, door for the earlier spelling dore, and luur for lure. This is Skeat's recommendation. XV. In the exceptional cases where a vowel at the end of a strest first syllable of a dissyllable is short, bring it into line with the scheme of our forefathers in the usual cases. 6 Economized Commercial Spelling by closing the syllable with a repetition of the consonant which begins the next syllable : as in ad-dle, bet-ter, fit-ter, bot-tle, gut-ter. Therefore spell baddy, not bo-dy, nowel not no-vel, Iffc. These cases are not so frequent as to seriously detract from the economies in other recommendations. And it hardly seems worth while to bother with this one in polysyllables: for, because of eccentric accents, they can't, at best, be got very far out of the rule of thumb. XVI. As q is simply a sign for cw, drop the absurdity of a third u in addition to the falsely named double u (w), and spell qestion, qeer, i^c. XVII. Instead of spreading to other words the already accomplished improvement of musick into music, physick into physic, tffc, which involves restoring the k in inflec- tions {e. g., physicking) drop the c instead of the k. This would, according to XV, involve repeating the consonant in blakking, crakking, etc., but the words would be no longer than they are now. It would also involve the in- consistency of retaining the c instead of the k in physician, musician, ifJc, but the inflection argument is stronger than this objection. ' XVIII. But when pluralizing a word ending in k, or representing any similar sound, get the good out of * — spell brix, crax, frox, connexion, reflexion, t^c. There are hosts of obviously foolish spellings hardly worth trying to bring under rule, e. g., been for bin, does for duz, of for uv, one for wun, two or to or too for tu. Sometime rational substitutes will get into the vocabularies, mean- while the rational way of treating tiiem, is like that of en- joying oneself at an Irish fair. N So far as we can see, that is about all that is worth trying with the present alphabet. Anything that hu- mans have to do can be over-refined into futility, and that danger is greatest where experts are prescribing for the every-day work of average people. There is no prac- Economized Commercial Spelling 7 tical need for trying to make written words represent all shades of spoken words, nor chance of success, especially as pronunciations vary with locality and time. We could represent more with a fuller alphabet, but it would be easy to spin out an alphabet that would be a cumbrous nuisance. The tendency has been to pare alphabets down, and there is a present-day wish quite general among scholars that we would do away with c and y: s and k would do all the work of the former, and i of the latter. Yet there would perhaps be a gain if we could restore the old monograms for th and dh, and get new ones for sh, zh and ng. But on the whole, the genius of writing seems to be not to burden the attention with anything new that can be done, even if more cumbrously, by tools already existing; especially as, by a few new com- binations and substitutions and omissions we can get along very passably with the present alphabet. , As to using diacritical marks: everybody who has studied Greek or French knows what a nuisance they are, and what perplexities, not to say profanities, they con- stantly inspire. Very few foreign learners have really mastered them. The idea of "simplifying" English by the introduction of them is worse than ridiculous. One great enemy of simplified spelling — perhaps greater than even excessive conservatism, is the counsel of perfec- tion. Expert philologians and phoneticians are constantly not only heaping up suggestions of superfluous refinements, but opposing obvious reforms because they are not perfect ones, and because of dead and buried historical con- siderations: for instance, to doubling t, as in briit, niit, y parallel, p a r a I e 1 parceled, p a r c e 1 d pass, pas passed, past peck, p e k pecks, p e X peers, p e e r z (see pierce) people, p e e p 1 photograph, fotograf photographed, fotograft phrase, f r a i z pick, p i k pierce, peers, see peers pierced, p e e r s t pitched, p i t c h t planned, p 1 a n d please, p 1 e e z pleasure, p 1 e z h u r pledge, p 1 e d j plumb, plum, but p 1 u m- m e r, not p 1 u-m e r possess, p o s e s s possessed, p o s e s t practise, p r a c t i s practised, practist preferred, p r e f e r d press, p r e s pressed, p r e s t programme, program pronounced, pronownst propped, p r o p t published, publisht pumped, p u m p t pushed, p o u s h t Quarter, q a r t r queer, q e e r question, q e s t i o n quick, q i k quiet, q i e t quit, q i t quite, q i i t quote, q o o t Rained, r a i n d raise, r a i z raised, r a i z d ranked, r a n k t reached, r e e c h t read (pret. and part.) red reason, r e z o n receipt, r e c e e t Some Economized Spellings 17 receipted, receeted receive, r e c e e v received, r e c e e v d referred, r e f e r d registered, r e g i s t r d released, r e 1 e e s t rendered, r e n d r d repealed, r e p e e 1 d request, r e q e s t require, r e q i i r responsible, responsibl restriction, restrixion returned, r e t u r n d reverser, r e v e r s reversed, r e v e r s t ridden, ridn rigged, r i g d right, r i i t risked, r i s k t robbed, r o b d rock, r o k rocks, r o X rough, r u f roughen, r u f-f e n rougher, ruf-f er routine, r u t e e n row, r o rubbed, r u b d, but rub- ber, not r u-b e r Sack, s a k sacks, sax said, s e d sailed, s a i 1 d says, s e z scattered, s c a t r d school, s c u u 1 scissors, s i z z o r s scratched, scratcht screw, s c r u sea, s e sealed, s e e 1 d search, s e r c h searched, s e r c h t season, s e z o n section, s e x i o n see, s e seemed, s e e m d seize, s e e z sell, s e 1, but s e 1-1 i n g, not s e-1 i n g sense, sens serious, s e r i u s serve, serv, surv served, servd, survd service, s e r v i s, s u r V i s settle, s e 1 1 settled, s e 1 1 d seven, s e v n shall, s h a 1 shallow, s h a 1 1 o shell, s h e 1 shipped, s h i p t shoe, s h u shoes, s h u u z shopped, s h o p t shortened, s h o r t n d should, s h o u d shove, s h u V show, s h showed, s h o o d (see should) sick, s i k sight, s i i t sign, s i i n signed, s i i n d signing, s i n i n g simple, s i m p 1 single, s i n g 1 skill, s k i 1 skilled, s k i 1 d skinned, s k i n d slaughter, s 1 a u t e r slight, s 1 i i t, s 1 i t e r, slit e s t slipped, s 1 i p t slow, s 1 o 1 8 Economized Commercial Spelling slumped, s 1 u m t smell, s m e 1, but smel- ling, not s m e-1 i n g smuggle, s m u g 1 smuggled, s m u g 1 d snapped, s n a p t snow, s n o some, s o m, s u m sought, s a u t spell, s p e 1 spelled, speld, or spelt but spelling, not s p e- ling spill, s p i 1, but s p i 1-1 i n g, not s p i-1 i n g spilled, spild, spilt spoiled, s p o i 1 d spread, s p r e d, but s p r e d-d i n g, not s p r e-d i n g stamped, s t a m t stayed, staid steamed, s t e e m d stepped, s t e p t stick, s t i k sticks, s t i X stiff, s t i f , but s t i f-f n, not s t i-f n still, s t i 1 stirred, stird, sturd stock, s t o k stocked, s t o k t stocks, s t o z stood, s t u u d stopped, s t o p t stow, s t o stowed, stood (see stood) straight, strait stuff, s t u f , but stuf- fing, not s t u-f i n g stuffed, s t u f t success, s u c c e s summed, s u m d, but s u m-m i n g, not s u- m i n g swelled, s w e 1 d, but s w e 1-1 i n g, not s w e- li ng Tack, t a k tacks, tax tagged, t a g d talk, t a u k talked, t a u k t talks, t a u X tanned, t a n d taught, taut taxed, t a X t telegraph, telegraf telegraphed, telegraft telephone, t e 1 e f o o n tell, t e 1 thanked, t h a n k t thanks, t h a n x theatre, t h e a t r thick, t h i k thinned, t h i n d thorough, t h u r r thoroughfare, thurrofair though, t h o thought, t h a u t threat, t h r e t threaten, t h r e t n threatened, t h r e t n d through, thru throughout, t h r u o w t throw, thro throwing, t h r o i n g thrown, t h r o o n thumb, t h u m tie, t y tight, tiit, titer, t i t e s t till, t i 1 tinned, t i n d Some Economized Spellings ig tipped, t i p t tomorrow, t o m o r r o tongue, t u n g to, t u toe, t o (see to) too, t u toes, t o z tossed, tost, but t s-s i n g, not t o-s i n g touch, t u c h touched, t u c h t tough, t u f , jj^ut t u f-f e n, not t u-f e n toward, t o a r d track, t r a k tracked, t r a k t tracks, t r a x traffick, t r a f f i k trafficked, traffikt transferred, transferd tread) t r e d, but t r e d- d i n g, not t r e-d i n g treasure, t r e z h u r trick, t r i k tricked, t r i k t tricks, t r i X trouble, t r u b 1 trough, t r a u f true, t r u tugged, t u g d twelve, t w e 1 V two, tu Various, v a r i u s vessel, V e s 1 vexed, v e x t victual, V i 1 1 victuals, V i 1 1 s view, V i u viewed, v i u u d Walk, w a u k ' walked, w a u k t walks, w a u X walled, w a 1 1 d warned, w a r n d washed, w o s h t wealth, w e 1 1 h wedge, w e d j Wednesday, W e n s d a y weigh, way weighed, w a i d weight, wait , well, w e 1 were, w e r whipped, w h i p t who, h u whole, h o 1 (see school) whose, h u u z wild, w i i 1 d (see willed) will, w i 1 willed, wild (see wild) window, w i n d o wished, w i s h t witness, w i t n e s witnessed, w i t n e s t worried, w u r r i d worse, w u r s would, w o u d wrap, rap wrapped, rapt wreck, r e k wrecks, rex wretched, retched wriggle, r i g 1 wrinkle, r i n k 1 P write, r i i t, or r i t e writer, r i i t r writing, r i t i n g written, r i t n Yellow, y e 1 1 o you, y u yourselves, yuurselvs young, y u n g Zealous, z e 1 1 u s Street Philadelphia, Pa. Dec. 9, EDITOR UNPOPULAR REVIEW, Sir: f Please find check enclosed for renewal of my sub^crij I wish also to tell you how I enjoy reading the review, work as an alienist compels me to live a large part of the! in an atmosphere of moral filth and mental perversity but j sometimes mclined to believe that my patients are sanei] better than the world at large. At all events it does me good and heartens me to read the sane, clear, wholesome I ter of your journal. I need say nothing in its praise as to I literary merit — that goes without saying. Your journa| power for sanity in a mad, hysteric, and neurotic wor country ruled by its emotions and worshiping at the shrij rhetoric. Yours sincerely THE UNPOPULAR REVIE Contents January'March, 1916 The Singing Man with the Hoe Your Blood and Mine Rear-Rank Reflections The Nine Sons of Satan What is Nationality.' If I Were a College President Efficient Democracy On the Distaff Side Tinkering the Constitutiok These Reformers The Case for the Literacy ' Patience Worth The Way of the Translator En Casserole: Who Wrote "Aa Ancient Conflict".' — Some Contributors — As to the Grouch — The Hard Path of the Reforii •Preparedness — Votes for Women — Another Amende — The Tal Dives — As to Contentment — What Will Money Be Worth Aft^ War.' — On Disappointing the Family. 75 c a number $ 2.50 a year 4 numbei A specimen copy sent subject to return or payment HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY ^^Sfw% Cotnall Unlvantty Ubiary arW9102 Economized commercial spelling 3 1924 031 423 639 oiin,anx