/6>70 (Jornpll Slam %t\\rxv\ Slibrarg Cornell University Library KFT1670.A87 Report of the Tax commission created b' 3 1924 024 708 624 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924024708624 REPORT OP THE TAX COMMISSION CREATED BY ACT OF MARCH 1, 1899, TO INQUIRE INTO THE SYSTEM OF LAWS AND BEGULATIONS NOW IN FORCE AFFECTING THE RAISING OF PUBLIC REVENUE AND THE DISBURSEMENT THEREOF. AND TO FRAME AND REPORT TO THE LBGISIjATURE A BILL OR BILLS CALCULATED TO SECURE AN EXHAUSTIVE AND EQUITABLE ASSESSMENT OF EVERY SPECIES OF PROPERTY, THE PROMPT AND EFFECTIVE COLLECTION OF TAXES, AND THE SPEEDY ACCOUNTING THEREFOR. DECEMBER, 1899. AUSTIN, TEXAS: VON BOBCKMANN, MOORE & SCHBIZE, ST^ lE rONTRACTOBS. 1899. 'h7S/2^ COMMISSION. GOV. JOSEPH D. SAYEES, Chairman ; HON. R. W. FINLEY, HON. JOE LEE JAMESON, HON. 0. B. COLQUITT, A. G. ScHLUTEE, Stenographer. CONTENTS. PAGE. Introduction 1 Chapter One. Levy and Assessment of Taxes 8 Chapter Two. Taxation on Land ]4 Chapter Three. Tax on Personal Property 19 Chapter Pour. Tax on Occupations 25 Chapter Five. Property Subject to Taxation and lihe Mode of Rendering It. . . 35 Chapter Six. Listing Railroad Property 42 Chapter Seven. Taxation of Bank Shares, Bankers and Brokers 67 Chapter Eight. Assessing Taxes '^'4 Chapter Nine. Of the Collection of Taxes 77 Chapter Ten. Taxation of Mortgages 83 vi Contents. Chapter Eleven. PAGE. Tax on Proportion of Capital Stock Employed in the State. ... 89 Chapter Twelve. Privilege Tax on Corporations 96 Chapter Thirteen. Tax on Gross Eeeeipts of Certain Corporations 98 Chapter Fourteen. Tax on Franchises of Corporations 104 Chapter Fifteen. « Tax on Building and Loan Associations 107 Municipal Taxes to Pay Railway Subsidies 107 Taxation in New Counties 108 Suits to Collect Taxes 108 Chapter Sixteen. Bonded Debt and Tax Rates 108 Chapter Seventeen. Conclusion 1] TABLE OF CASES CITED. PAGE. Adams Ex. Co. v. Ohio State Auditor (165 U. S., 194) 91 Am. Ref. Transit Co. v. Hall (decided April, 1899) 95 Bankof Comimercev. Tenn. (161 U. S., 135) 70 Bank of Aberdeen v. Cheha-lis Co. (166 U. S., 441) 71 Bankof Pittsburg v.Penn. (167 U. S., 461) 71 Bank of Wellington v. Chapman (173 U. S., 205) 73 Cassiano v. Ursuline Academy (64 Texas, 674) 37 Cleveland, C. C. & St. P. R. E. Co. v. Backus (154 U. S., 439) . 47 Farrington v. Tenn. (161 U. S., 135) 70 First Nat. Bank of Aberdeen v. Chehalis Co! (166 U. S., 441).. 71 Fort Worth St. Ry. v. Rosedale St. Ry. (68 Texas, 169) . . . 105 Hinson v. Lott (8 Wallace, 148) 108 Maine v. Grand Trunk Ry. (142 U. S., 217) 100 Merchants & M'frs Nat. Bank v. Penn. (167 U. S., 461) 71 Morris v. Royal Arch Masons (68 Texas, 698 V ... 37 McCullochv. State of Md. (4 Wheat., 430) 2 New York v. Tax Commissioners (94 U. S., 415) 69 Penna., 156, 488 88 Pittsburg, C. C. & St. L. R. R. Co. v. Backus (154 U. S., 431).. 46 Phila. & Reading R. R. Co. v. Penn. (15 Wall., 232) 101 P. Tel. Co. V. Adams (155 U. S., 688) 90 Red V. Johnson (53 Texas, 284) 37 Red V. Morris (72 Texas, 536) 37 Reagan v. Mer. Trust Co. (154 U. S., 411) 52 Reagan v. Mer. Trust Co. (154 U. S., 413) 56 Savings & Loan Soc. v. Multnomah Co. (169 U. S., 423) .... 86 St. Edwards College v. Morris (82 Texas, 1) 37 State Railroad Tax Cases (92 U. S., 605) • • .46-47 Union Pac. R. R. Co. V. Thomson (76 U. S., 579) 54 Union Pac. R. R. Co. v. Penniston (85 U. S., 5) 55 W. U. Tel. Co. V. Taggart (163 U.' S., 1) 90 Woodruff V. Parham (75 U. S., 123) 103 REPORT OF The Tax Commission of Texas. To the Legislature of the State of Texas: The act creating the "Tax Commission," made it our duty to "thoroughly examine the entire system of law and regulations now in force affecting the raising of public revenue, and the assessment and collection of taxes. State, county and municipal, and the method of accounting therefor, and of disbursing thereof, by the various officers charged therewith." It further provided that "said Com- mission shall have authority to investigate all kindred topics of leg- islation and to recommend such measures as to them shall seem advisable, in the general direction of a more perfect and efficient system of taxation."* The magnitude of the subjects given us for investigation is, per- haps, greater than would appear to a casual observer. "Taxation and kindred subjects" involves both the life and morals of the State, and in fact, in some way relates to the -whole code of political econ- omy. To investigate -them all would require a research and an ex- penditure of time and money evidently not oont^mplated by the amount of money appropriated to the Governor for this purpose. *"Section 1. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State nf Texan: Tbat there shaU be and is hereby created and established a Commission to be known and •called 'The Tax Commission,' to be composed of the Governor, the Comptroller of Public A.ccounts, the State Revenue Agent and one other person, to be appointed by the Governor, who shall be a competent expert in matters pertaining to taxa- tion and revenue. The said Commission shall exist and exercise the duties and functions herein provided no longer than may be necessary for the proper per- formance of such duties and functions, and in no event beyond the convening of the regular session of the Twenty-seventh Legislature. "■Sec. 3. It shall be the duty of said Commission, as soon as practicable, to thoroughly examine the entire system of laws and regulations now in force affecting the raising of public revenue, and the assessment and collection of taxes, State, county and municipal, and the method of accounting therefor, and of dis- hursing thereof by the various officials charged therewith, and to devise, frame and report to the Legislature a bill or bills designed and calculated to secure the following principal objects, to-wit: "First.— An exhaustive and equitable assessment of all taxes upon every species of prope-rty in this State, real, personal and mixed, tangible and intangible, and 1— T. 0. 2 Report of Tax Commission'. We have, theTefore, in the limited time at our disposal for the con- sideration of the question, given attention to the subject of taxation as it affects our State and county revenues, being Title 104 of the Eevised Statutes. The formulation of a system of revenue laws for a State is an undertaking of supreme importance. It is one of great responsi- bility, and the welfare of the State and the citizen must both be kept in mind. McCuUoch V. It has been said "that the power to tax involves the power to de- ^h'eB.to^m*^ stroy." This utterance was in reply to the contention made that a State had the "right to tax the means of the government of the Union, for the execution of its powers." It follows, of course, that if the means for executing the powers of government be destroyed, it renders useless the power to create. But no such question can arise in the consideration of a revenue Bill of Rights, law f Or this State. Under our organic law the State of Texas can- not destroy the property of its citizens or take it from them without their consent, unless adequate compensation be made. The power to Const.-, Art. 8, tax is expressly limited, and beyond this limit the legislature nor the ^^'^' ^' authorities of the municipal subdivisions of the State cannot go. Const,, Art, 7, A further tax can be levied by the citizen upon his property for the Sec, s. purpose of public education, but it can be done only with the con- sent of two-thirds of those affected. The limitation imposed by the Constitution puts it beyond the power of the legislature to destroy property by an ad valorem tax. Const,, Art, 8, The power to impose an occupation tax is the only instance in our Constitution where authority may be found for destroying anything whether belonging to natural or artificial, to residents or non-residents, to the end that no character of property, assets, holdings or valuable interests shall escape the due, just and equal burdens of lawful taxation, "Second,— To provide for and enforce the prompt, effective and complete collec- tion of all taxes imposed and assessed by the State and Its subdivisions and munic- ipalities, "Third.— To secure and compel the correct, perfect and speedy accounting of all officials interested by law-with the assessment and collection of taxes and the con- trol and disbursement of the public revenues of every description, "Sec. 3. Subsidiary to the main ob.iects hereinbefore named, said Commission shall have authority to investigate all kindred topics of legislation and to recommend such measurers as to them shall seem advisable, in the general direction of a more perfect and efficient 'system of taxation. For the purpose of carrying out the duties and powers herein defined, said Commission shall have access to all the public ofHoes of this State and of the several counties and municipalities, with the right to examine the books, accounts, reports and papers thereof, and to call for reports and statements from said offlcers, and shall have authority and power to summon and compel the attendance of witnesses, to administer oaths and to send for booics and papers necessary to accomplish the purposes herein declared, '•Prnvided, that each member of said Commission shall have the authority to ad- minister oaths to any witness and to take his answers in writing to any questions Sec, 1, Rkpout of Tax (.■ojimissiox. by taxation. No limit is placed on the legislature in levying taxes upon occupations. It can lay the tax in such an amount as to be prohibitory. But a prohibitory occupation tax is not resorted to except on the ground of police regulation ; that is to say, to prevent the doing of certain things as are not in themselves unlawful, but are repugnant and distasteful, by imposing a tax against them which will make them non-remunerative and unprofitable. This kind of a prohibitory tax is justified by the authorities, and is founded on sound public policy. It is seldom resorted to for revenue, and in the bill which we submit for your consideration it does not occur except in rare instances, and then only with a view of suppressing a public nuisance which cannot be suppressed in any other way. Taxation, as expressing the exaction of money from the individual for the support of the State, is familiar to all. Yet there are none who do not complain of this necessary recourse of the government to pay the expenses of governmental machinery and institutions which the individual himself has assisted in establishing. Civil government could not last or exist without taxation in some form. If society protects individuals, and the government or State preserves society, the government must have' the means to enforce those laws in- tended to regulate the conduct and mutual intercourse of individual members of society. It must resort to taxation to get that means, that being the recourse of civilized people. Perhaps few subjects are surrounded by more difficulties, practical and theoretical, than that of taxation. How to levy it in justice and equality, and at the same time make it productive, is a problem of deep interest to those affected by it, and of great concern to those who attempt to frame that such Commission, or any member thereof, may propound to him concerning the subject there under Investigation, and to report the same to said Oommission; prnvlded further, that no witness shall be compelled to leave the county of his resi- dence to attend upon said Commissiun to give evidence as provided in this act until he shall have had an opportunity to make written answers to questions as herein provided, and for the purpose of such written answers any ofBcer now authorized to administer oaths in this State may swear witnesses to such answers. ■'In case any witness is taken from the county of his residence to appear before said Oommission he shall receive the same witness fees granted a witness in crim- inal cases. "Sec. 4. Said Commission shall receive no compensation for their services, ex- cept the expert authorized to be appointed as expressed, who shall receive such reasonable compensation as the Governor may fix and direct to be paid. "The said Oommission shall have authority to employ such clerks, stenographers and other similar subordinates as may be necessary, and to do such printing as may be required in the performance of their duty, as herein defined. "Sec. 5. The sum of two thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500), or so much thereof as may be required, is hereby appropriated for the purpose of paying the compen- sation and defra.ying the expenses hereinbefore provided and contemplated."— Act March 1, 1899, Chapter 13, General Laws of 1899. 4 Repoet of Tax Commissiox. laws for this purpose. Indirect taxation is least complained of because not always directly felt, and is scarcely ever evaded to any considerable extent. Direct taxation is always the cause of com- plaint, because it is a direct exaction of the individual for the sup- port of the government, notwithstanding that government is of his own creation, ordained and established by him for the purpose of guarding against the transgression of his privileges and immunities, and to protect him in life, liberty and property. The tax rate is "uniform" for State purposes; it is "uniform" within the county for county purposes; it is "uniform" within the city or town for city or town purposes. But the valuation of the same kind of property is not "equal" under the present practice anywhere in the State. It is usually listed at whatever the assessor will receive it. It is required to be "taxed in proportion to its value, Const., Alt. 8, which shall be ascertained as may be provided by law." But the law ^'"^- ■'• is deficient now because it provides no method of ascertaining the proportion of its value. This is all left to the discretion of the board ooiLst.. Art. 8, of equalization in each county, the Oonstitutioji designating the *'^''' ^''^ county commissioners' court as such. We believe that Article 8 oE our present Constitution ought to be amended so that a better sys- tem of equalization of taxable values can be enacted by succeeding legislatures. We are aware that a constitutional amendment cannot be submitted at a special session of the legislature, but this observa- tion is made here because we deem it timely. Since the adoption of the Constitution ■ in 1876, the State has made great development. The article on taxation was framed, evidently, to guard against an abuse of the taxing power by the legislature, for the people of the State had just witnessed the conduct of the legislature in exempting certain property interests. We believe that the State can and ought to derive its revenue . mainly from sources not taxed by the counties, cities and towns. This can only be done by an amendment to Article 8, which would allow a separation of the levy and collection of the State revenues from the county taxes. It now costs the State seven and one-half per cent, of its revenues to assess and collect it. If the Constitution would permit, all the revenue needed to support the State govern- ment conld be collected through the Comptroller's office on a small increase of the present expense of conducting that department. For 1898, the State paid for assessing and collecting the State tax, $431,694. By an amendment which would permit the separation of the State and county tax in their assessment and collection, the State could levy certain forms of taxes on particular interests which Report of Tax Commission. would not be taxable by the counties, requiring the tax to be paid to the Comptroller or Treasurer, and leaving all other real and personal property to be taxed by the counties. This would relieve the property of the State of a considerable sum that is now being paid out in commissions for assessing and collecting the State tax. Under the present taxing article of our Constitution each county has a board of equalization, and there is no equality in the values upon the same character of property in the several counties of the State. Under the present system a citizen in one county may list his property for taxation at fifty cents on the dollar, and the board of equalization would accept and approve the rendition. But in an adjoining county that citizen's brother might render some of the identical property, or property of the same kind and identical in valu# at one hundred cents on the dollar, or at its true and full value, thus being required to pay double as much State tax on the same property as his brother who lived in the first mentioned county. The number of incidents like the above illustration is perhaps as numerous each year under the present system as the number of coun- ties in the State, and almost as many, perhaps, as there are tax- payers in the several counties. As far, therefore, as the State tax goes, nothing is more unequal than the values in the several counties of the State. Such inequalities in values is an injustice that we should make haste to correct. No citizen can justly complain when the laws of his State require him to pay tax on his property in the exact proportion to its value. And when levied and collected for the purpose of enforcing the laws and maintaining the government eco- nomically administered, no patriotic and intelligent citizen will ob- ject to a law which requires every one to pay in the proportion to the value of his property, whether the tax be levied for State, county or city. But a law, the administration of which may exact double as much revenue for State purposes on the same property from a citizen in one county as in another, is unjust and indefensible. Nothing illustrates the inequality of valuations in the several coun- ties better than the railroad property. A railroad may traverse the State from north to south, passing through fifty counties; each mile of that road being necessary to complete its value, and being in equal use, is of equal value per mile; yet it is safe to say that each county will place a separate value per mile upon the miles within that county, without reference to the value of the whole property or its value per mile in any other county. Our system of taxation is not entirely similar to that of any other State. But as central and controlling spirits in the settlement and Report of Tax Commission. development of Texas came from Connecticut, Missouri, Tennes- see, and Georgia, and from the traces of similarity .which we find in the system of taxation here, most of our tax laws must have been framed after those in vogue in Georgia, Tennessee and Missouri. The patriots who made the early history of Texas and builded the foundation for a great future for the State were from various States of the American Union, and each saw the need of contributing a fair proportion of what he possessed for the security of all, and the early system of taxation was the work of necessity, perhaps, more than the experience of older settlements. The life, the sovereignty of the settlement resided in those who composed it, and the ties of ■race and kindred were drawn tighter by the constant need of a common defence, and a tax levy and a tax collection was as neces- sary as to the "village moot" of old.* In such times wh«i the foundation for a greater development and civilization were being firmly laid, no one thought of trying to shirk his portion of the burden which was imposed for the general welfare, and it was con- tributed in just that proportion which each possessed bore to the needs of the community of which he was a member. But with the development of society, the accumulations of wealth, and increase of population, the tendency is toward the evasion of the taxing laws of the State. This is true of every State in the American Union. Several of the States have appointed tax com- missions to investigate the subject of taxation and the revenue laws of their States, and as far as we have had opportunity of examining them, the reports of each and every one of them discuss the ques- tion of evasion of taxation and the undervaluation of property for assessment. Complaint is made in most of them of the assessing ofiB- cers aiding in undervaluing property, all of which necessitates a *"In its iVIoot, the common meeting of its villasers for justice and government, a slave had no place or voice, while the laet was originally represented by the lord whose land he tilled. The life, the sovereignty of the settlement resided solely in the body of the freemen whose holdings lay round the moot-hill or the sacred tree where the community met from time to time to deal out its own justice and to make its own laws. "Here new settlers were admitted to the freedom of the township, and by-laws framed and headman and tithingman chosen tor Its governance. Here the plough- land and meadow-land were shared in due lot among the villagers, and field and homestead passed from man to man by the delivery of a turf cut from its soil. Here strife of farmer with farmer was settled according to the "customs" of the townshij) as its elder men stated them, and four men were chosen to follow head- man or eaidorman to hundred-court or war. It is with a reverence such as is stirred by the sight of the head waters of some mighty river tliat one looks back to these village moots of Frlosland or Sleswiok. It was here that England learned to be a 'Mother of Parlliiments.' "It was In tliesii tiny knots of farmers that the men from whom Englishmen were to spring loiu'Mcd the worth of public opinion, of public discussion, the worth of Report of Tax Comjiission. higher rate on that which is listed. What is found to be the practice in other States exists in Texas. How to devise a system that will distribute the burden of taxation upon all alike in proportion to what they possess, and in proportion to the privileges enjoyed, and the benefits received, is a problem of first importance, not only here, but everywhere. These general observations are deemed appropriate. The subse- quent portions of this report will discuss more particularly the details of the present law and of the bill we have formulated and the changes and new features it contains. In the formation of the bill differences developed on many points, but the report and the bill herewith submitted is approved by every member of the Com- mission. The views and convictions of any individual member being reserved, but in each instance acquiescing in the will of the majority of its members. We met with many difficulties in harmon- izing the limitations of the Constitution with what we deemed much needed legislation in reaching property for taxation that now con- tributes but little; but we believe the bill as submitted conforms to the Constitution and the decisions of the higher courts on taxation. agreement, the 'common sense,' the general conviction to which discussion leads, a^ one of the laws which derive their force from being expressions of that general conviction. "A humorist of our day has laughed at Parliaments as 'talking shops,' and the laugh has been echoed by some who have taken humor for argument. But talk is persuasion, and persuasion is force, the one force which can sway freemen to deeds such as those which have made England what she is. The 'talk' of the village moot, the strife and judgment of men giving freely their own rede and setting it aside as freely for what they learn to be the wiser rede of other men, is the ground- work of English history. "Small therefore as it might be, the township or village was the primary and per- fect type of English life, domestic, social and political. All that England has been since lay there. But changes of which we Icnow nothing had long before the time at which our history opens grouped these little commonwealths together in larger communities, whether we name them. Tribe, People or Folk. The ties of race and kindred were, no doubt, drawn tighter by the needs of war. The organization of each Folk as such, sprang in all likelihood mainly from war, from a common ground of conqup'^t, a common need of defence."— "History of English People," by John Richard Gfreen, M. A., pp. 12, 13. Report of Tax Commission. CHAPTEE ONE. LEVY AND ASSESSMENT OF TAXES. Arts i. 5040 and 3047, R. S. Art. ,'5050. E. S. Art. 486, E. S. Art. .39;i8a, E. S. The legislature levies the tax for general State and school pur- p'.^es. The commissioners' court levies the county tax. The city or '■own coiincil levies the tax for cities and towns. The commissioners- courts of the several counties are given the power to also levy a special tax for the further maintenance of public free schools where it has been voted as provided by law. In any town or city that has assumed exclusive control of the public schools within such town or Art. 4027, R. s. city, by a vote of the people, the city council or board of aldermen levies an additional school tax when voted. "All property in this State, whether owned by natural persons or corporations, shall be taxed in proportion to its value, which shall be ascertained as may be provided by law."* The maximum amount of tax that can be levied against property is fixed for State purposes, Const., Art. s. exclusive of the tax necessary to pay interest on the public debt, at thirty-five cents on the one hundred dollars ; for State school pur- Art. r. Sec. a. poses the, maximum is twenty cents on the one hundred dollars; for all county purposes as follows : Twenty-five cents for general pur- poses; fifteen cents for roads and bridges; twenty-five cents for per- manent improvements ; and may, by two-thirds vote of the property taxpayers levy an additional fifteen cents on the one hundred dol- lars for roads and bridges. Cities and towns of less than ten thous- oonst., Art. n, and inhabitants may levy the same amount of tax and for the same Const., Art. Purposes as the counties are authorized to levy, and may in addition, 11, Sec. 10. levy a special school tax when voted by two-thirds of the qualified *"Section 1. Ta.xation shall be equal and uniform. All property In this State, whether owned by natural persons or corporations, other than niunlclpnl. shall In- taxed In proportion to its value, which shall be asi-ertatned as may bo provided by law. The legislature may impose a poll tax. Tt may also impose ooenpation taxes, both upon natural persons and upon eorporatlons, other than municipal, doing any business in the State. It may also tax incomes of both natural persons and cor- porations, other than municipal, except that persons cngasi'd in mechanical and a,;;rM'ultural pursuits shall never be required to jiay an oecu])ation tax; provided, that two hundred and fifty dollars worth of household and Ultchen furniture, be- lonRing to each family In this State, shall be exempt from taxation; and provided further, that the occupation tax levledby any c mnty. city or town, for any year, on peisiiiis or ciii'poriitions pursuing any profession or business, shall not oxc(\ed one- half of the tax levied by the State for the same period on such profession or busi- n<'ss. Levy and Assessment or Taxes. property taxpayers. Cities with special charters and having over ten thousand inhabitants are limited to two and one-half per cent. on the taxable property of such city. It is further provided that counties and cities bordering on the Gulf of Mexico and subject to calamitous overflows (upon the vote of two-thirds of the taxpayers therein), may levy and collect such tax for the construction of sea const., Art. walls, breakwaters and sanitary purposes, as may be authorized by ^'' ^'^°- ''■ law. For ordinary purposes, therefore (unless increased by vote of the property taxpayers for school or roads and bridges), the limit cf county taxation is sixty-five cents on the one hundred dollars' valuation, and the same limit applies to all towns with less than ten thousand inhabitants. In eases where the above maximum rate will not pay the interest and provide a sinking fund to meet obligations contracted according to law, prior to 1883, a special tax is permitted in excess of the general maximum, but it must be levied separate from the other tax which a county or town is authorized to collecr, and shal]. when levied, specify in the act of levying, the purpose const., Art. therefor. The time is fast approaching, if not now here, when this ^^' ^'^- ^■ constitutional limitation can be still further reduced. As shown by the statements of the county debt and county tax rates which is published as an appendix to this report, the county debts of many counties occasioned by public improvements, are fast being extin- guished. Even now, as compared with the rate of taxation in the counties in most of the other States, the county tax rate, on an aver- age, is lower than in many of the older and better developed States. As to the management of the finances of the cities and towns, the assessment, collection and disbursement of their revenues — that is a very great question and much more difficult of solution. Many of the towns and cities of Texas, while yet in their infancy, stimu- lated by pride and ambition to secure the conveniences of a city, fell into the hands of promoters, incurred debts for shoddy and in- '•Sjsc. 2. All occupation taxes shall tie equal and uniform upon the same class of subjects within the limits of the authority levying the tax; but the legislature may, by general laws, exempt from taxation public property used for public pur- poses, actual places of religious worship, places of burial not held for private or corporate profit, all buildings used exclusively and owned by persons or associa- tions of persons for school purposes (and the necessary furniture of all schools), and institutions of purely public charity, and all laws exempting property from -taxation, other than the property above mentioned, shall be void. "Sec. a. Taxes shall be levied and collected by general laws, and for public pur- poses only. '■Sec. 4. The power to tax corporations and corporate property shall not be sur- rendered or suspended by act of the legislature, by any contract or grant to which the State shall be a party. "Sec. 5. All property of railroad companies, of whatever description, lying or being within the limits of any city or incorporated town within this State, shall 10 REroET OF Tax Commission. ferior public improvements, and gave away valuable franchises that would now be sources of large revenue, lightening the burdens of ad valorem taxes. Const., Art. s, The Constitution provides for the election of an assessor of taxes ^'"'' "■ by the qualified voters of each county, who shall hold his office for Art. 5103, R. s. two years. The assessor is required to take a list of all taxable prop- Art, sioe of g^j.y .j^ j^.g county between the first day of January and the first day of June of each year, by calling upon the person, or at the place of business or at the place of residence, of the person owning property. If the taxpayer is not at home or at his place of business, the assessor is required to leave a written or printed notice requiring such person to meet him and render a list of his property at such time and place as may be designated in such notice. It has been suggested to the Tax Commission that the property owner should be required to meet the assessor at the county seat, or other designated place, and render his property. This is required in a number of the States. In Massa- chusetts the law requires "the inhabitants to bring into the assessors true lists of all their polls and personal estates, and may require them to include their real estate in their lists of property subject to taxation." But the assessor is a servant, and in this State he is com- manded to wait upon the people — go to them — and receive a list of their property for assessment, it being deemed best to have the assessor seek the property owner. The assessor is required by law to secure a list of all property, real, personal and mixed, within his county, and assess it between the first day of January and the first day of June in each year. He calls upon the property owners for a list of their property accordingly, beginning early in January. Many of the counties are large, some of them being larger than some of the New England States. There are fifty-five counties in the State that contain more square miles bear its proportionate sharu of municipal taxation ; and if iiiiy surh property shall not have been heretofore rendered, the authorities of the city or town within which it lies, shall have the power to require its rendition, and to collect the usual munici- pal tax thereon as other property lying within said municipality. "Sec. 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury but in pursuance of specific aijpropriations madu by law; nor shall any appropriation of money be made for a longer term than two years, except by tlif lirst legislature to assemble under this constitution, which may malce the necessary appropriations to carry on the govern- ment until the assemblage of the sixteenth legislature. ".Seo. 7. The legislature shall not have power to borrow, or in any manner divert from its purpose, any special fund that may or ought to come into the treasury; and shall make It penal for any person or persons to borrow, withold or in any manner divert from Its purpose, any special fund or any part thereof. Sec. 8. All property of railroad companies shall bo assessed and the taxes col- lected in the several counties in which said property Is situated, including so much of the road bed and fixtures as shall be in each county. The rolling stock may be Levy and Assessmemt of Taxes. H than Ehode Island ;* there are fourteen counties larger than Dela- ware, there are three counties larger than Connecticut, and there is one county in Texas larger than either Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, or Few Jersey. Under any tax law, much will neces- sarily depend upon the full and faithful performance of his duties by the assessor, f If he be lacking in integrity, industry, courage and efficiency, any law, however carefully enacted, will fail in its purpose. The Commission feels that it cannot too strongly urge the paramount necessity for selecting the very best men possible to discharge the duties of assessor, for upon them in a great measure, if not altogether, will depend the efficacy of any measure relating to the assessment of property. The taxpayer is now required to Art. 5098, r. s. sign an affidavit to the effect that he has rendered a complete, full and true list of all property owned by him and subject to taxation. But it is claimed by many that they are not require'd to swear to ■ the value of their property. In this State, as elsewhere too, little attention is paid to equality in valuations. The''assessor too often does not insist upon valuing the property for taxation, and the per- son rendering it places as little value upon it as he thinks the -assessor assessed in gross in the county where the principal office ot thecompany is located, and tlie county tax paid upon it shall be apportioned by the Comptroller ol Public Accounts in proportion to the distance such road may run through any such county, amorjg the several counties through which the road passes, as a part of their tax assets. ••Sec. 9. The state tax on property, exclusive ot the tax to pay the public debt, and of the tn.xes provided for the benefit of the public free schools, shall never •ex- ceed thirty-five cents on the one hundred dollars' valuation, and no county, city or town shall levy more than twenty-five cents for city or county purposes, and not exceeding fifteen cents for roads and bridges on the one hu ndred dollars' valuation, except for the payment of debts incurred prior to the adoption of the amendment, September 25, A. D, 1HH3; and for the erection ot public buildings, streets, sewers, waterworks, and other permanent improvements, not to exceed twenty-five cents on the one hundred dollars' valuation in any one year, and except as in this Con- stitution otherwise provided; and the legislature may also authorize an additional ■►El Paso county contains 9,750 square miles. New Hampshire has 9,305; Vermont, 9,ia5; Massachusetts, 8,0i0; New . Jersey. 7.455. The two other counties largerjthan Connecticut are Pecos with 6,700 and Brewster with 6.180 as against 4,485 'ifor the '•Nutmeg" State. Rhode Island with her 1,085 square miles is exceeded in area by the following counties in Texas, in addition to the two above named: Andrews, Atascosa, Bexar, Brazoria, Brewster, Cameron. Clay, Coleman, Crockett, Dallam, Deaf Smith.Dimmit, Duval, Edwards. Encinal, Floyd. Gaines, Hale. Hardeman, Harris, Hartley, Houston, .Jeff Davis. Kerr, Kimble, Kinney, La Salle, Liberty, Live Oak. McMuUen. Matagorda, Maverick. Medina. Montgomery, Nueces, Oldham, Polk, Presidio. Reeves, San Saba, Schleicher. Starr, Sutton, Tom Green, Upton. Val«Verde, Webb, Ward, Wharton. Zapata, Zavala. +A letter to a member ot the Commission states that in one county the assessor has been sued for his failure to assess as required by Article S103. R.;S. Thejletter states that he made no further effort to assess the property than to advertise his office hours, and the estimate is that not more than one-third of the taxpayers rendered their property. 12 Report of Tax Commission. will accept -without complaining to the board of equalization. The property owner oftentimes will not give it in at its "full and true value" and justifies himself that his neighbor has not done so and will not. So the list and valuation is placed upon the rolls and reviewed by the board of equalization. A- few citizens will be cited to show cause -why their propertv should not be rated at a higher value for taxation, but the great body of assessments, no nearer the real value of the property assessed, is approved -without question. There are counties in the State where a low valuation is desired by the board of equalization, upon the theory that a slight increase in the county tax rate on a low valuation will assist the citizen of the county to escape a part of what he would pay the State on a full valuation, for in listing and assessing property for taxes the assessor represents both State and county, and the tax for both is collected on the one assessment. The New Jersey State Board of Taxation, in their report for 1896, speaking of the practice of undervaluation by assessors in that State, says : "It is quite evident that an assess- ment made by an assessor and sanctioned by the borough council upon a standard of one-third value is an injustice to the other tax- ing districts of that county and to the other counties of the State which are called upon to contribute to the State school tax." In New Jersey, each borough or township has an assessor and the county board of assessors is composed of members from each subdivision of the county. In their report for 1897, this State board complains that the county board of assessors vehen they meet to approve and equalize their assessments, caucus together, each working to get pledges to vote for the approval of lists from his borough or district, as assessed. In Texas the board of equalization is comprised of one commissioner from each commissioners' precinct, and the county judge. When property listed for taxes is submitted for review and equalization, each member is presumed to be acquainted ad valorem tax to be levied and collected tor the lurtluT mainteniui.-o of llie pub- lic roads: provided, that a majority of the qualified property taxpayins voters of the county votins; at an election to bo held for that pur|yiso, sli;ill vote such tax, not to exceed fifteen cents on the one hundred dollars' valuntion of the property sub- ject to taxation in such county. And the leRislature niiiy puss local laws for the maintenance of public roads and highways without local notice required for special or local laws. • "Sec. 10. The legislature shall have no power to ri>le;ise tiie inhabitants of or property in any county, city or town, from tin- payment of tiiN.'s levied I'or State or county purposes, unless in rase of -real public calamity in any such county, city or town, whi^n such release may be made by a vote of two-thirds of each house of the legislature. -SEC. II. All properl,y.wiu,ll,er owned by persons or corporations, shall be as- sessed for taxation, and tli,. taxes paid in the county where situated; but the legis- lature may, by a two-thirds vote, autnorly.e the payment of taxes of non-resid6°nts Levy and Assessment of Taxes. with the property- in his district and here and there is picked out a piece of property that is believed by the assessor, county judo-e or other member of the board, to be assessed too iow. The party own- ing It IS cited to show cause why it should not be increased in value for taxation. No systematic plan is in use in this State for' valu- ing property and equalizing it for taxation, and it is unfortunately too true that in this respect, inequality is the rule, and equality and uniformity the exception. The wealthy and influential property owner pays least in proportion to what he possesses, and the small holder of property pays the most. A systematic inquiry into the question by a Congressional Committee for the District of Columbia, Report No. showed that the owners of modest cottages paid taxes on valuations '^^^' ''''"^ in proportion to true value, of double as much as the owners of ses^L^"''* palatial residences. And we believe it is the case in Texas that the owner of a small farm, or the owner of a cottage in one of our thriving county towns, pays taxes on something near the value of his holdings, while his wealthy neighbor, with broad acres or a mag- nificent residence in the city, pays on a much less proportion of its value. The late Comptroller of New York,' Mr. Eoberts, one of the best informed men in the country on questions of revenue and taxa- tion, says, in his report for 1898, that "the assessor undertakes by reducing valuations on his own responsibility and in defiancte of law to protect his own county or town from paying more than its fair proportion of tax, and self-interest lulls the moral sense of the community into support of his action." Equally as strong an in- dictment can be drawn against those who connive for the purpose of securing assessments at one-half or one-fourth the true value that the citizens of their county may escape the payment of their just proportion of the State tax. The inequalities in valuation for purposes of taxation, seem to be inherent in all systems of direct taxation. The gross inequalities of counties to be made at tae office of the OomptroUer of Public Accounts. And all lands and other property not rendered for taxation by the owner thereof, shall be assessed at its fair value by the proper officer. "yKO. 13. All property subject to taxation in, and owned by residents of unorgan- ized counties, shall be assessed and the taxes thereon paid in the counties to which such unorganized counties shall be attached for judicial purposes; and lands lying in, and ownod by non-residents of unorganized counties, and lands lying in terri- tory not laid off into counties, shall be assessed and the taxes thereon collected at the office of the Comptroller of the State. "Sec. 13. Provision shall be made by the first legislature for the speedy sale of a suificient portion of all lands and other property for the taxes due thereon, and every year thereafter, for the Sale of all lands and other property upon which the taxes have not been paid ; and the deed of con veyance to tlie purchaser for all lands and other property thus sold shall be held to vest a good and perfect title in the purchaser thereof, subject to be impeached only for actual fraud; provided, that 13 14 Report of Tax Commission. of valuations ; the defects of our equalization system, earnestly sug- gests the need of some common control or supervision in so far as State taxation is concerned, in order to secure uniformity of manner and efBciency of its administration. This is not possible under our present Constitution which gives into the hands of the commission- ers' courts of the two hundred and twenty-three organized counties, the supervision of values for State taxation. This means a distinct valuation of the same kinds of property in each county, and much, if not the greater portion of the inequality of taxation in this State springs from the fact that there is no central or supervisory head to enforce a uniformity of values. CHAPTEK TWO. TAXATION OF LAND. Our system of taxing land is after the custom of England when, in the Seventeenth century, land was the chief subject of taxation. It is now the principal object of taxation in this State, and the framers of the present Constitution seemed to contemplate contin- uing the practice of making it the principal producer of the revenues of the State, county, city and town governments, and school dis- tricts. According to the compendium of the Eleventh census, the real value of real estate in Texas, with improvements thereon, amounted to $1,230,417,771, and the real value of personal property was $885,158,995, a total of $2,105,576,776. For that year the report of the Comptroller of Public Accounts shows that 116,586,738 the former owner shaU, within two years from the date of the purchaser's deed, have the right to redeem the land upon the payment of double the amount of money paid for the land. "Sec. 14. There shall be elected by the qualified electors of each county, at the same time and under the same law regulating the election of State and county officers, an assessor of taxes, who shall hold his otBce for two years and until his successor is elected and qualified. "Sec. 15. The annual assessment made upon landed property shall bo a special lien thereon, and all property, both real and personal, belonging to any delinquent taxpayer, shall be liable to seizure and sale for the payment of all taxes and pen- alties due by such delinciuent; and such property may be sold for the payment of the taxes and penalties due by such delinquent, under such regulations as the leg- islature may provide. "Sbo. 16. The sheriir of each county, in addition to his other duties, shall be col- lector of taxes therel'or. But in counties having ten thousand inhabitants, to be determined by the last preceding census of tlic United States, «. collector of taxes Taxation of Land. 15 acres of land were rendered for taxation at an average value of $3.04 per acre, making a total of $353,998,331, and 16,502,921 acres of land were assessed to non-resident owners in unorganized counties, adding a valuation of $24,754,382, making a total valuation of acres of land assessed, $378,752,713. To this should be added the value of town lots which were assessed that year at $145,524,497, making a grand total of $524,277,210 as the assessed value of real estate. The assessed value of all other property in 1890, including railroads, was $357,834,673, or a total assessed value of real and personal prop- erty of $782,111,883, against the real valuation of $2,105,576,766. These figures show that the land for that year was assessed at 37.03 per cent, of its true value, while the personal property assessment was 31.56 per cent, of its true value. Texas is now credited with 267,002 square miles of territory, which equals 170,881,280 acres, and in making estimates of per cent, of value of land by the census of 1890, as compared to the assessed value, allowance should be made for the difference between the number of acres assessed and the number of acres in the State. The total number of acres assessed for that year was 135,089,641, which leaves 35,791,639 acres belonging to the public school, university and asylum funds which is not taxed, exempted lands,* right of ways, and lands on which towns and cities are s'tuated. This would make an average assessed value for 1890 of about sixty cents on the dollar of the true value of lands in the State, the census real value being taken as the basis of estimation. The average assessed value of land is now about what it was in 1890. The Comptroller's report for 1898 (see page 100), shows 124,963,- 489 acres were rendered for taxation at an average value per acre of $3.11. That year 6,003,078 acres were assessed to non-resident shall be elected, to hold ofiace for two years and vintil his successor shall be elected and qualiSed. ■'Seo. 17. The specification of the objects and subjects of taxation shall not de- prive the legislature of the power to require other subjects or objects to be taxed in such manner as may be consistent with the principles of taxation fixed by this Constitution. "Sec. 18. The legislature shall provide, as near as'.may be, for equalizing the valuation of all property subject to or rendered for taxation (the county commis- sioners court to constitute a board of equalization) ; and may also provide for the classification of all land? with reference to their value in the several counties. "Sec. 19. Farm products in the hands of the producer and family supplies for home and farm use, are exempt from taxation until otherwise directed by a two- thirds vote of all the members elect to both houses of the legislature."— Constitu- tion. Article 8. *By an act of 1874, twenty sections, consisting of 640 acres of land each, to the mile were granted to the International and Great Northern Eallroad Co., and exempted from taxation for twenty-five years from August 5, 1875. 16 Report or Tax Commission. owners in unorganized counties at $6,003,078, and the assessed- value of town lots was $185,937,615, making the .total assessed values of real estate for 1898, $581,068,583. The tax values increased from 1890 to 1898 as follows : Assessed value of real estate in 1898 $581,008,583 Assessed value of real estate in 1890 524,377,310 Showing an increase of $ 56,791,373 The figures show that more acres were assessed in 1890 by 3,132,- 948 than in 1898. This difference in the number of acres assessed can only be accounted for upon the theory of forfeiture of lands to the State in western Texas by the purchasers thereof. The increase in value of real estate in eight years as shown above comes almost entirely from an increase in the value of city and town lots, the actual increase in the value of land acreage being only seven cents per acre in 1898 over 1890. The general increase in the value of land and town lots since 1890 is indisputable, but the taxable in- crease has been very small. A comparison in the assessed values of personal property is more noticeable. The term "real estate," as used in this chapter, embraces acres and lots, only. The value of railroads, telegraph, telephone and street railways is included in chapter three under the head of "personal property." All prop- erty other than acres of land and town lots is included together for the purpose of showing the proportion of taxes which the land and town lots are bearing. We will discuss the assessment and collec- tion of tax upon personal property in another chapter (Chapter Three).* For 1898 the real estate as assessed above, contributed to the revenues of the State, the following : General purposes at 30 cents on the $100 $1,163,137.16 State school purposes at 18 cents on the $100 1,045,923.44 Total $3,308,060.60 This is the amount assessed against lands in the State last year •Personal property, for taxation, consists of liorseu, mules, ciittle, .iaclis, jennets, sheep. Roats, hogs, clogs, carriages, wagons, and all other vehicles, goods and mer- chandise, material and manufactured articles, manufacturer's tools and imple- ments, engines and hollers, money, credits of all kinds, including notes and mort- gages, bank stock, bonds and stock, shares in all stock companies, railroad rolling stock, steam and other vessels, and all mlsoellaneous property. For the purpose of showing the proportion of tax paid by land and town lots as compared with all other property in the State, railroads, telegraph, telephone and street railway property is included in chapter three. Taxation of Land. for general State revenue and State school purposes. The county tax rate will average 59 cents on the $100* which would be a fur- ther tax on this land of $3,428,304.64. We make no effort to give the amount of tax collected by cities, towns and school districts, because we have not sufficient reliable data on which to make a correct estimate. To^ show the inequalities in valuing land for taxation we have compiled a statementf from the number of acres and the amount at which they are assessed, taking six north Texas counties, border- ing on each other; likewise, six east Texas counties, six south Texas counties, six middle Texas counties, and nine counties situated in southwest, west and northwest- Texas. It is believed that the lands in the north, middle and south Texas counties named in the foot note, were rendered at from twenty-five to fifty cents on the dollar of their true value. The average price per acre at which it is ren- dered in each county as shown in the note and the general character and productiveness of the land, and the purpose for which it is used, will serve to indicate the per cent, of the true value at which it is assessed. -East Texas lands, we believe, are rendered on an average of fifty to seventy-five cents on the dollar of their value, while in southwest, west and northwest Texas lands are valued for taxation at probably from fifty to one hundred cents on the dollar. In some counties in east, west, northwest and southwest Texas there are many individual instances where land is valued by the commission- ers' court at more than it can be sold for. The general average for the State is as before stated, $3.11 per acre. But this is a great agricultural and stock-raising State. The great herds of the State feed and fatten in the west and southwest and northwest. In north, east, south and central Texas, cotton is the great product. Value of land is estimated largely by the profits in what it produces. Until the present year the price of cotton has been downward and its production is said to be unprofitable, or the profits small. In *Including the school tax levied locally in some counties, the average county tax rate would he 60 cents on the SIOO. +The following shows the average assessed value of land per acre in the counties named': Six north Texas counties: Grayson, S9.57; Fannin, J8.53; Lamar, $6.45; Hunt, $8.32; Kaufman, J8.31; Dallas, S11.35. Six east Texas counties: Nacogdoches, $1.50; Bowie, $2.77; Smith, S3.57; Wood. $3.11; Euslt, $3.63; Jasper, $3.34. Six middle Texas counties: McLennan, $10.54; Bell, $8.77; Falls, $9,65; Milam, $6.74; Williamson, $9.49; Kohertson, $4.86. Six south Texas counties: Fayette, $7.05; Galveston, $11.05; Harris, $6.51; Fort Bond, $5.91; Colorado, $5.10; Bastrop, $4.64. Nine counties in southwest, west and northwest Texas: Bexar, $5.50; Cameron, $1.05,- Webb, $0.98; El Paso, 81.26; Mitchell, $1.30; Wilbarger, $3.91; Donley, $1.05. a-T. O. 17 18 Report op Tax Commission. the west they have begun to grow cotton and other staple produce, and the range for cattle has been good for several years, and besides, the price of cattle has been upward and the business of cattle rais- ing profitable. Land has borne and is bearing the burden of taxation in Texas, as it probably is throughout the country. It bears about double as much of the burden in this State on the. dollar of its real value as personal property. We do not wish to be understood as favoring the undervaluation of any kind of property for taxation. On the contrary, we think the only equitable way is to require the rendi- tion of all property, real, personal and mixed, at its full and true value. Then each kind of property, or the owner thereof, would contribute a just and equitable share of these necessary burdens. But as all prosperity depends, primarily, on the successful cultiva- tion of the soil and the harvesting of its productions, it ought to be the purpose to relieve it from a greater tax burden than that which other property, equally or more productive, bears. With this end in view, we have formulated provisions which it is believed will compel other property in the State to contribute its fair proportion of taxes. If light taxes be conducive to the acquirement of any particular kind of property, then Texas, above all other things, should, by this policy, encourage every citizen to own a home. The ownership of a home gives stability and permanency to our citizenship ; encourages a love and pride of State and country; is a bulwark of safety and protection to our institutions and to all the people, and is the surest and safest way to lasting prosperity. Tax on Pbksonal PaorEETY. CHAPTER THREE. 19 TAX ON PERSONAL PEOPEUTT. The taxation of personal property, or, more correctly speaking, the reaching it for taxation, is a question which has engaged the thought and attention of the tax commissions of every State that has investi- gated the subject. The comptrollers and auditors of a number of States have expressed their disgust and disappointment at the failure of the assessing ofiBicers to reach it. It hides, or is hidden, from the tax oflBcers. In 1790, President Washington, in delivering his second annual address to Congress, said that the prompt payment of the public revenues was "an honorable testimony to the patriotism and integrity of the mercantile and marine part of our citizens." In responding to this address of the President, and to that particular part of it, the House of Representatives used these words: "For oan we learn .without an additional gratification that the energy of the laws for providing adequate revenues have been so honorably seconded by those classes of citizens whose patriotism and probity were more immediately concerned." The Federal taxes were then, and are now, promptly paid. But it is due to the "energy" wjth which they are enforced. It was the energy of the revenue laws that two years after this address, suppressed the "whiskey insurrection" in Penn- sylvania where the collection of the tax on distilled spirits was re- sisted. It is the lack of this energy in the enforcement of State revenue laws, which enables the wealth of the country to escape its just share of taxes. Tax laws may be obnoxious, but that they are necessary will not be denied. The Federal revenue laws are respected because they are enforced with "energy," by the revenue collectors and in the courts, when need be. In our State the assess- ment and collection of the revenue is confided to ofiBcers who are chosen every two years, and the owner of personal property is not always pressed to know if he has any he has not listed. He signs the aflSdavit in a perfunctory manner, and that ends the inquiry. The law taxes the property that has been sent beyond the State or county for the evasion of taxation, but such property is rarely reached. The man with thousands of dollars in bank sends his clerk 20 Report of Tax Commissiox. to render his property and tells him to render five thousand dollars in money when he may have fifty and probably one hundred thou- sand. Or, maybe, he will ask for a draft on New York for his deposit with the bank, a few days before the first of January. This he will put into his pocket and keep there until January 1st has passed, and thus this particular property, though subject to taxation under the law, is not listed. The report of the Comptroller shows the assessed value of property in the State for 1890 as follows : Personal property $194,740,037 Eailroads, telegraph, telephone, and street railroads. . 63,094,636 *Eeal estate, acres and town lots 524,277,210 And for 1898 shows the total assessed value of property in the State to be as follows : Personal property $208,471,279 Eailroads, telegraph, telephone, and street railroads. . 65,079,503 Eeal estate, acres and town lots 581,068,583 The amount of revenue due the State government in 1898 from personal property, exclusive of railroads, telegraph and telephone lines, and street railroads, was as follows : Revenue from General revQuue purposes $416,942.55 land, see p. 33. State school purposes 375,248.30 Total $ 792,190.85 The amount of revenue due from railroads, telegraph and telephone lines, and street railroads for 1898, was: *The following shows the assessed value of real and personal property for the eight years named: YUAB. REAL. PERSONAL. 1890 S 499,522,828 $ 382,589,055 1891 577,621,608 278,578,675 1892 5S7,337.550 269.189,050 1893 607,9il,700 278,233,695 1894 599,868,515 265.252,47* 1895 599,127,433 261,783,134 1896 587,560,471 262,748,775 1897 593,474,702 257,834,544 1898 581,008,583 273.550,782 Railroad, telegraph, telephone and street railways are included in the value of personal property and are so tabulated In the footings of the comptroller's reports down to and including 1896. In the total of personal property for 1890 was included $24,764,383, being the value of lands in unorganized counties assessed to non- residents. Tax on Personal Peopkrty. 21 General revenue purposes $130,158.00 State school purposes 117,143.10 Total $ 247,301.10 Or a total from both $1,039,491.95 From the above figures it i? seen that if the taxes due upon the property mentioned had been collected, 34.39 per cent, of the ad valorem State tax assessed for 1898, for general revenue and school purposes, came from taxation on personal property. Including rail- roads, telegraph, telephone and street railroads with personal prop- erty, these contributed 33 per cent, of the ad valorem State tax. This is less than one-third of the whole amount of the ad valorem tax, and shows that the real estate included in the term "acres and town lots," paid 68 per cent, of the ad valorem tax for the year 1898. But the difficulty exists not only in undervaluation, but also in the non-enlistment of property. We hear of men in a community being rated at fifty, one hundred, two hundred thousand, a quarter and half million dollars, and their names so appear in the commercial reports, but we search the tax rolls in vain to find the property that would justify such rating. Where is the property ? Perhaps in the stock of corporations, in land notes, or money in bank, and not as- sessed. It is an admitted fact that money at interest, stocks, mort- gages, as well as other forms of personal property, escape taxation in this State to an extent that is alarming. It is difficult to get at such property if the citizen who is fortunate enough to own it per- sists in concealing it from the assessor and refuses to list it for taxa- tion. The experience in other States shows a condition equally as bad, or worse than ours. Comptroller Roberts of New York, in his report for 1898, advocates the abolition of tax on personal property with great earn- estness, because of the difficulty in reaching it. He estimates the personal property of that State to be worth eighteen billion ($18,000,000,000) dollars, and the amount rendered for taxation at only three per cent, of that sum. In lieu of the personal property tax he advocates an increase of the inheritance and transfer tax, and says : "Would not the citizen be willing that a small sum be paid from his estate at death for the privilege of living honestly with his State during life ?" Is not this a sad commentary on the "integrity" and the "probity" of the descendants of those people of whom Wash- ington and Congress spoke in 1790? What is true of New York as 22 Repoet of Tax Commission. regards the evasion of taxation by personal property owners, is true to a greater or less degree throughout all the States of the Union. A Congressional committee* found it to be true in the District of Columbia in 1893, and in their report say that it "would be a better expression of the truth to say that in matters of taxation there seems to be very little public conscience left, and that the general sentiment is that no one is bound in honor or Jionesty to pay any tax that he can by any device escape from." Aversion to paying taxes on any- thing that can be avoided is probably due in a large degree, to the profligate expenditures of those charged with its disbursement, and to the continual piling up of public debts. A government, of what- ever character, that exacts a larger sum in taxes from its citizens than is necessary for legitimate objects, perpetrates an injustice that is indefensible. But a citizen, whose wealth and example in the com- munity is potent, who sears his conscience and lists his property to escape a fair share of the legitimate expenses of the government which affords protection to him and his wealth, is guilty of a crime in a double sense. The burden which he should bear is shifted to the shoulders of others of less opulence, who have to bear it in the form of an increased rate on what -they possess. We do not believe that because personal property owners strive to avoid the payment of a reasonable tax upon their property it is a good reason why such property should be exempt from taxation. On the contrary, strin- gent laws should be enacted and energetically enforced compelling such property to yield to taxation. If a time should come when we must admit that we cannot do it, then we should evolve another systemf and look in another direction for revenue for the carrying on of the machinery of the State govarnment. *"In the last report nl the assessors of the District of Columbia It is intimated that 'the public conscience is becoming somewhat elastic on the subject of taxii- tion.' This is putting an obvious fact very mildly indeed. So far as our investiga- tion goes, it would be a better expression of the truth to say that in matters of tax- ation there seems to be very little public conscience left, and that the general sentiment is that no one is bound in honor or honesty to pay any tax that he can by any device escape from ; and men whose word is as good as their bo jd, who would feel themselves disgraced in depriving a private creditor of a penny of his due, malte no scruple whatever In defrauding the government of its claim and shiriiing their responsibility forwlial is held to be their due to society in return for the benefits which they receive from society. "-Report No. 1189. Congressional Committee, First Session of Pifty-seconrt Congress, on "Assessment of Tuxes in the District of Columbia." +"When the house is .so rotten thiit it is beyond repair, there is a cull for him to clear the ground. But if the foundations and walis nre strong and plumb, and it is only a question of a new roof, or of improved Interior arrangements, the men of destructive tendencies should be clubbed off the premises. The leaky roof and unsanitary inierior must, however, hnve attention, and the architect and his work- men must get to worlv with /.eal and a plan. The tenants will stand together Tax on Personal Property. It is equality in values and full rendition of all property in the State that we are striving for now. If this can be done the tax rate for State purposes could be lowered even under the present system to such a sum as to be almost unnoticeable. If the money, bonds, stocks, notes, mortgages, jewelry and personal effects over and above exemptions, were listed for taxes, and horses, mules, cattle, jacks, sheep, goats, hogs, carriages, buggies, wagons, furniture and fixtures, gold and silver plate, steamboats, and other water craft, goods, wares and merchandise, and all other personal property enumerated in Article 5076 of the bill formulated by the Tax Commission were to respond to taxation for half their value, or that proportional true value that land does, the tax rates would greatly decrease, and if all were to respond in full value a tax rate of two cents on the hundred dollars would be. ample for all the State's needs for general State and school purposes. But such results are Utopian, and their reali- zation cannot be expected. Much of the personal property is "intangible," and it is difficult to reach, except through the assessor, and often he can't get at it foT assessment, even if he makes an effort. But much of it is "tangible" and can be reached and "its value ascertained as may be provided by law," as it is provided in the Constitution the legisla- ture may do. Stock in banks and all corporations can be reached by a prescribed method. "Intangible personal property" is generally regarded as most diffi- cult to reach. Under this head comes stock and bonds of foreign corporations, money at interest, and the like. Speaking of the law in their State, taxing this kind of property, the Massachusetts Tax Commission of 1897, said: "Whatever may be the truth as to other parts of the tax system, it is admitted on all sides that this is unsat- isfactory." They admit that such intangible personalty is not listed for taxation in Massachusetts. That large sums of such property are held there, there is no question. The Connecticut Tax Commis- ai^ainst the destructionists and the firebugs; but have a care, for If repairs are not promptly and wisely made, if the dwellers on the first floor cut off heat and water from the dwellers in the attic, things may become so intolerable that the tenants of the attic will open the doors to the firebugs. Those who occupy the first floor and the commodious and elegant middle stories, must pay their share of the gas and water bills. The great middle class of our people has never failed to respond to the Are alarm, though they have only small properties at risk, and these not Immediately threatened. But there is danger that they will lose llieir zeal as fire- men if those in whose apartments the fire has been kindled do not pay their pro- portionate cost of the fire department. There must be a searching inquiry into the distribution of the heat and water supplies, conducted, not by a tip-talcing janitor but by a committee of the whole house. If there has been any monopolizing of these things, or any failure to pay for them proportionately, we must be as active 33 24 Repobt of Tax Commission. sion of 1881, speaJcing of a demand in that State, said : "The objec- tion to taxing money at interest secured by mortgage comes from the holders of this class of property which is secured by real estate out- side of our territorial limits." They add : "It would certainly be unwise to put a premium upon diversions of local capital to other fields of employment under the temptation of high rates of interest by shielding those diversions from contributions to the public ex- penses."" In 1886 another Tax Commission was appointed in Con- necticut, and the register of the "grand list" of property assessed for 1884 shows $7,038,153 of "money at interest" against $13,789,36a in 1864, a falling off of nearly half in twenty years. The same grand, list showed the land in the State to be listed at $59,693,984, and according to the Eleventh census there were $79,931,071 of real estate mortgages in force in that State on January 1, 1890. We use these figures from Connecticut as they are at hand, to illustrate the, truthfulness of the declaration of the Massachusetts Tax Com- mission in 1897, when speaking of Massachusetts, they said: "In each of the cities a few persons of unusual conscientiousness make returns," of this intangible property. The Appeal Tax Court of Maryland, answering a question propounded to it by the Tax Com- mission of that State, in 1881, said: "We utterly fail in reaching private securities of any description. Here and there only have they been returned by some conscientious holders." Ex-President Harrison, in an address before the Union League Club in Chicago, on Washington's birthday, 1898, took for his subject, "The Obliga- tions of Wealth," and in discussing this evasion of taxation by the wealthy holders of personal property, in the concluding part of his address, said: "The practical question, the one our people must solve, and solve speedily, is the enforcement of the personal property, tax and the equalization of real estate assessments. If no other remedy can be found, perhaps the State might declare and maintain an estoppel against the claim of any man or his to stamp out the monopoly and. the injustice as we are to extinguish a fire. To stamp out a Are is a much simpler process than to correct unjust social or legal relations. The cry of "Are'' arouses everybody, and stirs the most sluggish to in- stant action; but to ferret out a wrong is tedious, and the work neither attracts nor arouses us very much, unless the sting is under our own skin. "The great bulk of our people are lovers ot justice. They do not believe that poverty is a virtue or property a crime. They believe in equality of opportunity and not of dollars. But tlierc must be no handicapping ot the dull' brother, and no chicanery or fraud or shirking, if our plan of taxation includes notes and bonds and stocks, they must be listed. Tlie plea ot business privncy has been driven too hard. If, for mere statistical purposes, we may ask the head of the family whether there are any idiots in his household, and enforce the answer by court process, we may surely, for revenue purposes, require a detailed list of hissecuritles The men Tax on Occupations. heirs to property, the ownership of which he had disclaimed in his tax returns." These are the words of a great lawyer, a man of wide experience, and former head of the nation. Personal property in times of tranquility is valuable and brings large incomes, but if a storm arises it takes the strong arm of the government to protect it from annihilation. It follows that those who own large estates of personal property should contribute in taxes a full share of the revenue needed by his State. 25 CHAPTEE POUE. TAX ON OCCUPATIONS. What our law terms a "tax on occupations," is called in most of the States a "privilege tax." The levy of this kind of tax is as necessary now as it was in the long ago when it was resorted to both as a regu- lation of trades, professions and callings, and for revenue. Indirect taxation causes less complaint as previously observed. The early financiers learned this and imposed excise and occupation taxes as avoiding some of the complaints and affording some relief from the burden of direct taxation against property in general. Shakespear.e paid a license or occupation tax upon his theatre; Blackstone had to pay his annual stamp tax as an attorney. The shop-keeper, the ship-broker, the ship owner, the banker, the auctioneer, the horse dealer, the liquor dealer, and many other occupations were taxed, upon the theory that they would charge the tax upon the cost pf their goods or services and whoever bought their goods or employed their services finally paid this tax. This is still the theory on which occupation taxes are levied. For the most part it is sort of an in- who have wealth must not hide it from the tax gatherer and flaunt it on the street. Such things breed a great discontent. All other men are hurt. They bear a dis- proportionate burden. A strong soldier will carry the knapsack of a crippled com- rade, but he will not permit a robust shirk to add so much as his tin cup to tlic burden. The special purpose of my address today is to press home this thought upon the pro.sperous, well-to-do people of our communities, and especially of our great cities; that one of the conditions of the security of wc:ilth is a proportionate and full contri'bution to the expenses of the State and local governments. It is not only wrong, but it is unsafe, to make a show in our Jiomes and on the streets that is not made in the tax returns."— From address before the Onion League Cluli. Chicago, February 3.3, 1898, on the "Obligations of Wealth," by ex-President Ben- jamin Harrison. 26 Report of Tax Commission. direct taxation. Except is case of professions^ taxation of all kinds, occupation and ad valorem, and even the cost of carriage, selling and insuring, is added to the cost of what is offered for sale. All this expense, therefore, is paid by the consumer. It may be said, therefore, that the largest consumers pay the greatest amount of this tax. The occupation tax is directly against the merchant, it is true, but it is indirectly paid by the consumer. The tax is not burdensome on the merchant and it is not likely that he would reduce the price of his goods to the consumer if the tax should be abolished. Nearly two-thirds of our occupation taxes are collected from liquor dealers. They pay a high tax to secure a license to engage in that particular business. It is imposed both as a police regulation and for rev- enue They pay the tax directly to the government, but every per- son that purchases of them pays part of it back, because the tax is added in the cost of the drink. In 1898, Texas collected through county collectors $941,701.08, from occupations. Of this amount, wholesale and retail liquor dealers paid $559,600.00, and beer dealers paid $95,550.00, or a total for both of $685,150.00, and the balance, or $286,551.00, was paid by all other occupations taxed. Nearly one-third of the State's revenue is derived from occupation taxes. If the sum derived from that source was levied against the real and personal property in addition to what it now contributes, and the occupation taxes abolished, there would be such an outcry against such a policy as has not been heard in this State since the oppressive days following the close of the Civil War. There is ho demand that we have heard for the abolition of the occupation tax, generally. Now and then a particular class, or some persons following a par- ticular business or profession, want the tax taken off of them. Some advocate the graduating of the tax on all occupations on the basis of the amount of business done. "This is the plan adopted in Louisiana. The equity of the plan commends it, and it was with this view that the merchants' occupation tax was classified. We find that most of the merchants have classed themselves with the eleventh or lowest class, the State tax on which is three dollars per annum. Asking equity and doing equity ought not to be inconsistent terms in matters of this sort. Chapter two of the bill which we submit, deals entirely with the question of occupation taxes. The first subdivision of Article 5049 levies ,1 tax upon merchants and divides them into eleven classes. They are taxed a stipulated sum on the amount of their estimated annual purchases. A merchant is defined, and every person, firm, corporation or association engaging in business as a merchant is Tax on Occupations. 27 required to pay the tax before pursuing such occupation.* The esti- mated annual purchases must be supported by affidavit. It is made the duty of the tax collector to file these affidavits with the grand jury for their examination. Article 110a, of Chapter 5, Title 4, of the Penal Code provides that merchants shall be punished for underclassing themselves in the payment of occupation tax, and it is believed that these requirements will induce merchants to class themselves more in accordance with their real standing in the mer- cantile world. Subdivision 5 is divided into two classes, Class A imposing a tax upon what might be termed "curbstone brokers," who speculate in, and shave notes, accounts, county and city warrants and time checks. Collectors now complain that many pursue this occupation and evade the payment of the tax on account of the ambiguity of the present law on that subject. Class B imposes a tax upon private banikers and investment brokers, and defines who are private bankers and investment brokers. Subdivision 8 taxes ship agents and ship brokers and better defines who are ship agents and ship brokers. Commercial brokers and custom house brokers are taxed in sub- divisions 9 and 10, and in each case commercial broker and custom house broker is properly defined. Under the present law the tax collectors complain that they have great difficulty in enforcing the collection of the tax imposed against commission merchants. There seems to be a conflict between subdivision 10, subdivision 36 and subdivision 61, of the present law, and the ambiguity of the sub- divisions named hampers collectors in the collection of this tax. We believe that under the provisions of the accompanying bill this class of persons is properly defined and no trouble will be experienced in locating and collecting the tax from them in the future. JSTo tax is now imposed upon custom house brokers, and the tax collected from this source will be additional revenue. The tax in subdivision 31 on theaters and concert halls is gradu- ated according to the size_of the town or city in which such amuse- ments are given. *According to the best infoimation obtainable there were 37,169 mercbants doing business in Texas in 18E8. Ot this number 20,311 paid occupation taxes, amounting in the a-gregate to $150,673.76, an average of 17.00 to each merchant, and they were divided into classss as follows: There were 13,177 paying as eleventh class, tS.OO per year- 3 610 were ot the tenth class, paying $6.00; 1,744 ninth class at 113.00 each; 757 eighth class at 830.00 each; 633 seventh class paying $25.00 each; 358 sixth class, pay- ing $60.00 each ; 82 fifth class paying 8135.00 each ; 33 fourth class paying $150.00 each ; 15 third class paying $200.00 each: 10 second class paying $350.00 each; 4 first chiss paying $100 00 each. There appeared to be 6.858 who paid no occupation tax. The 28 Report of Tax Commission. The tax on the circus is regulated by subdivision 22. By the present law, any circus charging an admission fee of one dollar is taxed two hundred and fifty dollars for each performance ; where an admission fee of seventy- five cents is charged, two hundred dollars; where an admission fee of fifty cents is charged, one hundred dollars. It further provides that where a fee is charged for reserved seats that it shall be construed as a part of the admission fee and the circus taxed accordingly. This provision has been evaded by giving a continual performance and by charging fifty cents for general ad- mission and twenty-four cents for reserved seats, thus evading the evident purpose of the law and paying the minimum amount of tax. We deemed it best to change this provision so as to make it clear, and we provide that for each day's performance or exhibition, where an admission fee of fifty cents is charged, that the circus shall pay one hundred and fifty dollars for each day, and seventy-five dollars in addition for each days' performance when more than fifty cents admission, fee is charged. The tax now imposed upon performances of sleight-of-hand and legerdemain, is construed to be twenty-five dollars for each perform- ance. This afEects little shows that travel through the country and give school house entertainments. It does not prevent these exhibi- tions of sleight-of-hand or legerdemain, but they usually carry some cheap jewelry, or other article, which they sell at a price to include the cost of admission and thus evade the payment of the tax. It is believed that with a tax of twenty-five dollars per year to the State, and five dollars to each county, these people will pay the tax and the State will derive some revenue on that account. Besides, 'We do not see any good reason for imposing a prohibitory tax against these amusements. There has been a contest in the courts over the payment of the tax on livery stables aad hack drivers. Subdivision 30 makes such changes in the present law as will meet the objections of the Court of Criminal Appeals in a recent decision wherein this subdivision is made practically inoperative. other occupations taxed paid the following sums to the Stiito for 1898; Alley nine or ten pins, SU,700; aui:tioneers. AuT.'iTy, hankers, SlO.liliS.rr.; beer dealers, 395.550; billiard and pool tables, Ss,440; dsarette dealors, S8,080; i-ircuses, ?7,loO; clairvoy- ant, $1:3.50; cock-pits, ?nH.7j; commission merchants, $1.75l).ii0; concerts, $1,592; cotton and wool b.uyers, Sl.i:i7; cotton factors, Si661.75; cotton seed products, S:75; dentists, SJ,008.75; electric light companies, $1,801.2,-.; exhibitions, $170; acrobatic,'. $400; medicine vendoi's. S-'.".0; sieight-ot-hand. S25; sloreoscoptc, §110; wax-works S«0; flylns-Jennios, $4(K; fortune tellers, SfiO: gas companies, $306.S5; grain ele- vators, $-200; hacks, wagons, etc.. 83,180.50; ice dealers, SiilO; insurance agents; gen- eral S.-i,3:J0; local, SI,U6; Industrial, $.t7..'>0; land agents, S3,378.7.>; laundries $i2l); Tax on Occupations. The Court of Criminal Appeals also declared the tax on lightning rod agents to be unconstitutional, because it was a tax, to a certain extent, upon interstate commerce. We have framed the subdivision on this subject with a view to meet the objections raised in that opin- ion, and the tax is levied against lightning rod agents as peddlers of lightning rods, and they are divided into two classes. Subdivision 35 taxes wool and cotton factors and better defines who wool and cotton factors are. Subdivision 36 imposes a tax upon grain and lumber brokers of thirty-iive dollars. This will be a new source of revenue, and there is no good reason why brokers in lumber and grain should not con- tribute in taxes for the privilege of dealing in such articles, as well as other brokers. Live stock brokers are also taxed, in subdivision 37, and this will be a new source of revenue. Subdivision 39 imposes a tax of ten dollars to the State, and five dollars to the county on cotton buyers, and defines who a cotton buyer is. Muclj complaint is made now by persons engaged in the occupation of buying cotton that they are required to pay this tax in each county. It is provided in the accompanying bill, that the tax shall not be paid but one time, and that in the county of the residence of the person engaging in the business. This will secure a better compliance with the law and be more satisfactory to those paying the tax, as well as those who collect it. Subdivision 43 is a change from the present law taxing real estate agents. This is changed so as to reach persons engiaged in this busi- ness apparently for themselves, but who are following it for an occu- pation and loaning for others, and, therefore, are subject to the tax as now contemplated by law. The tax on this class of persons is reduced in the belief that a reduction will induce its payment by a number of people who now endeavor to evade it. The tax on base ball parks, imposed by subdivision 46, is a reduc- tion of from fifty to twenty-five dollars per year. Subdivision 48 taxes ice dealers and divides them into four classes, lawyers, $11,820; lightning rod dealers, $171; lightning rod peddlers, S500; liquor dealers, retail, $536,700, wholesale, S13,900, local option districts, $1,000; livery sta- hles, $3,747.60; loan agents, $3,400; medical specialists, $575; medicine, traveling vendors, $587.50; menageries, $90; pawn brokers, $5,906.25; peddlers, foot, $3,202.50; with one horse, $3,071.35; two horses, $4,267.50; peddler of clocks, coOking-stoves, etc., $63.50; phonographs, etc., $200; photograph galleries, $3,983.75; physicians, sur- geons, etc., $19,485; pool sellers. $130: race tracks, $50; rack, knife, cane or doll, $750; sewing machine dealers, $730; ship brokers and ship agents, $307.50 ; shooting gal- leries, $.503.75; skating rinks, $18.75; street railroads, $348.83; theatres, $1,575; toll bridges, $3S.5(); wagon yards, $1,063.75; water works, $1,065. 29 30 Report of Tax Commission. the tax being graduated according to the population of the cities or towns in which the dealers are engaged in business. Subdivision 49 taxes grain elevators, where they charge fees or toll for storage, and divides them into three classes, the tax being graduated according to the capacity of the elevator. A provision in the present statute imposing a tax on race tracks of fifty to one hundred dollars is omitted. The present law exempts race tracks conducted in connection with agricultural fairs and exhi- bitions. We believe it better to leave it out entirely, as the exemp- tion made it of doubtful constitutionality. The tax imposed by the present law on foot peddlers and peddlers in sail vessels was declared void by our Court of Criminal Appeals, because of certain exemptions from its operation. This court also held that the subdivision imposing a tax on peddlers in clocks, cook- ing stoves, ranges, washing machines, churns, etc., to be unconstitu- tional, because of the exemption of local merchants from the tax. The old law imposed a tax of two hundred and fifty dollars on such peddlers. This is changed as found in subdivision 57, and leaves off the exemption and reduces the tax to fifty dollars. Subdivision 58 imposes a tax of five hundred dollars upon persons selling or offering for sale the Kansas City Sunday Sun, and similar publications. This provision is in the Eevised Statutes of 1895, but the Twenty-fifth Legislature, in amending the occupation tax article, dropped this provision, and this tax is not now imposed by law. Subdivision 59 imposes a tax on all persons engaged in the busi- ness of railroad ticket scalper, of twenty-five dollars. This is a new subject of taxation. Article 5050 of the present law, which relates to the power of the commissioners' court to levy taxes on the valuation of all property subject to taxation, and one-half the amount of occupation tax im- posed by the State, is embodied in Chapter 3 of the accompanying bill, and the tax required to be paid annually in advance as State occupation taxes are paid. Many occupation taxpayers object to paying such taxes in advance. Prior to 1897 they were collected quarterly; but this entailed a great amount of labor upon collectors and involved a great deal of uncertainty as to the amount of revenue the State would derive from this source. For that reason the Twenty-fifth Legislature changed the law and required the payment of occupation taxes in advance, and we believe that this feature ought to be continued. The present law leaves the collection of occupation taxes very largely to the discretion of the collectors in the several counties. Tax on Occupations. 31 They are not required to report a list of persons doing business sub- ject to the tax, who are delinquent, to the Comptroller, as he is re- quired to do in case of persons delinquent in the payment of taxes on land. It is unjust to collect the tax from one or more persons following an occupation and let their neighbors go without paying it. As now enforced, unless those owing the tax get upon the books of the collector by paying it, the chances are that a taxed occupation may be pursued months, and in many instances, indefi- nitely, without a demand being made for the tax. Article 5054 of the accompanying bill requires the collector to demand the tax of all persons liable, and if it be not paid, to seize and sell as much of his property as will pay the tax and cost of the proceeding. And if the collector fails or refuses to carry out the law, he is made liable on his bond for the tax, and it is made the duty of the county attor- ney to prosecute any derelict collector. And any county attorney who fails or refuses to do so, is subjected to a. misdemeanor fine and may be dismissed from office. It is too much the practice now, to allow delinquent occupation taxpayers to go months after their tax is due, without paying it, and when it is paid the receipt is dated at the time of payment. This causes confusion and often loss of revenue to the State. It is pro- vided in Article 5055, of the accompanying bill, that all tax receipts and licenses issued and the stubs corresponding thereto, shall show the exact date from which the license runs, and also of the payment by the party taking out the same and paying the tax. A penalty is aflSxed against any collector who inserts a date in such receipt or license different from the date of actual payment. The present law requires collectors to file complaints against per- sons following an occupation taxed by law without paying the same. But the Ifiw is indifferently enforced in this respect, notwithstanding that it is a misdemeanor in the collector not to do so, and punishable by fine of from fifty to five hundred dollars in each case where a see Art. iir. person fails or refuses to pay the tax. By Article 5056a, of the ^™^^ °°'5®- aceompanying bill, the collector is still further liable, and may be sued by the Slate and county for not less than fifty dollars in each case. Article 5056b, of the accompanying bill, makes a still further requirement of the collector in that he cannot receive a final dis- charge in the settlement of his accounts with the State until he shall have filed his affidavit with the Comptroller setting forth that he has collected and properly accounted for the tax due from every person, firm, corporation or association in his county, who was subject to the same for the preceding year, or that he has used every 82 Report of Tax Commission. means provided him by ]iiw to collect the same, and must support his affidavit by certified abstracts of all unpaid Judgments or fines against those delinquent. The collector is also required to keep a book in which he must enter the names of all persons in his county subject to any occupation tax, and is required to transmit monthly, a statement to the State Revenue Agent, showing all persons delin- quent in the payment of occupation tax. With these stringent re- quirements upon collectors, and the penalties prescribed for failure to comply with them, it is believed that the revenue from the tax on occupations will be largely increased, and that many who now escape its payment entirely, will be reached. It is admitted by all that the occupation tax law is very imperfectly enforced in many of the counties of the State. It is unjust to require its payment by some and allow others to escape it entirely, and severe penalties should be imposed on all collectors who do not impartially enforce its collection. The State Revenue Agent. The State Eevenue Agent is a very important factor in securing the enforcement of the occupation tax laws. The regular session of the present legislature amended the law relating to this officer and enlarged his powers. But the work marked out for him in the law is more than it is possible for any one man to accomplish. Texas is a very large State, and has 233 organized counties.* The Eevenue Agent ought to visit each county at least one time each year. But this is impossible, as there are nearly as many counties in the State as there are work days in the year, and many counties will require several days for each visit, and more visits than one is required in a year, in very many. It is believed that he should be given some help, and provision for the appointment of three deputies has been made. With this assistance the occupation tax laws can be much better enforced and the increase in the revenue from this source will, we believe, amply justify this course. As it is made his duty now by law, under the direction of the Governor, to examine any and all of the State institutions and the manner of conducting the same, it is required that one of these assistants shall be an expert accountant. He and his deputies are given the authority to admin- ister oaths and to examine witnesses. In the examination of any institution for any cause, on the complaint of any one, statements made should be under oath, as that is the usual and proper course where' ireputation and character are involved. "There are nineteen unorganized counties In the State. Tax on Occupations. 33 Liquor Dealers' Tax. The tax on liquor dealers is divided into four classes. Class A affects wholesale dealers in liquors and medicated bitters, and a tax of four hundred dollars per annum is imposed. Under the present law they pay the same as the retail dealer, but the Commission are of the opinion that there is a difference, and that the wholesaler should pay more than the retailer. A wholesaler is defined to be one selling in quantities of one gallon or more, and in this particular is the same as the present law. Class B includes those who sell liquors or medicated bittersi in quantities of one gallon or less, and a tax of three hundred dollars per year is imposed. This is the same as the present law as it applies to saloons selling whiskey and other intoxicating liquors by the drink or in quantities of one gallon or less. Class C applies to exclusive dealers in malt liquors. The tax on them is placed at seventy-five dollars per annum, an increase of twenty-five dollars. They now pay fifty dollars. Class D applies to druggists selling liquors on the prescription of a physician in a local option district. They are taxed two hun- dred dollars. This is the present law. The revenue derived from these sources last year was as follows* : Eetail liquor dealers $536,700 Wholesale liquor dealers 12,900 Beer dealers 95,550 Local option district dealers 1,000 Total $646,150 A minorityf of the Tax Commission advocated a uniform license, and doing away with the license granted to exclusive dealers in malt liquors. But a majority thought differently and adopted the above classification, which increases the wholesale liquor license one hun- dred dollars, and the exclusive beer dealer license twenty-five dol- lars.! These changes, it is believed, will increase the revenue forty tx) fifty thousand dollars per annum. A further change in the law *In 1898 there were flfty-flve counties that were under the operation of local op- tion There were 4.093 liquor dealer licenses issued in the remaining counties of the State for the year ending June 30, 1898, 1,958 of them being to liquor dealers and 3,134 being to "exclusire" malt liquor dealers. +Mr. Colquitt. §The United States collected $566,568.73 for the fiscal year ending June 30th, 1898, on beer brewed by Texas breweries. 3-T. O. 34 Report of Tax Commission. taxing and regulating the business of liquor dealers is made in Arti- cle 5060h, requiring that the bond of any person obtaining a license to sell malt liquors exclusively shall contain the additional condition that if any character of liquor other than that of malt is sold, the obligors upon such bond shall become liable to the State and county each, in the sum of one hundred dollars for each and every such sale of such liquors other than malt, and providing that recoveries shall be had upon such bond until it be exhausted. It has been shown in many cases, that persons have taken out a beer license, paying fifty dollars therefor, and have engaged in the sale of other liquors under that license. It is a fact that some of the exclusive beer dealers do this, and it is to guard against such infractions that the additional condition is prescribed for the bond of an exclusive malt liquor dealer. It is further provided in Article 5060k, that any person obligating himself as surety upon any liquor dealers' bond, required by Chapter 5 of the accompanying bill shall, at the time of becoming such surety, qualify himself before some oflScer author- ized to administer oaths, by an affidavit duly signed and sworn to, as to what he is worth over and above all exemptions and liabilities of every character, furnishing a schedule of his property that is subject to execution, which affidavit and schedule shall be appended to the bond and made a part thereof. Retail liquor dealers are, and have for years, been required to give bond in the sum of five thous- and dollars, and exclusive malt liquor dealers are required to give bond in the sum of two thousand dollars, to keep an orderly house, and to do and observe other things mentioned in the bond. In many places these bonds are made by the saloon men, each going on the other's bond, and it is for the purpose of making these bonds some- thing more than mere form, that this last named condition is re- quired of the obligors on these bonds. The above indicates the principal changes made in the present law taxing and regulating liquor dealers. Pkoperty Subject to Taxation, Etc. CHAPTER FIVE. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO TAXATION AND MODE OF RENDERING IT. This subject was given the most careful consideration by the Tax Commission. It defines what is real estate and what is personal property for the purposes of taxation; defines terms used in describ- ing it; sets out a list of exempted property; prescribes how and by whom it shall be listed and what shall be included in the list. The subject is covered by Chapter 2, of Title 104, of the Revised Civil Statutes of 1895, but in the bill submitted it is numbered chapter six and is much changed from the present law. Real estate for the purpose of taxation, as now defined, includes "the land itself and all e. s.. Art. ooos the buildings, structures and improvements, or the fixtures of what- soever kind, and all the rights and privileges belonging or in anywise appertaining thereto, and all mines, minerals, quarries, and fossils in and under the same." This definition is much enlarged and is made to specifically include all improvements of railway companies, telegraph companies, telephone companies, wharf and dock com- panies, all supports, enclosures and other appurtenances of electric light companies, street railroad companies, including the value of all franchises, rights or permission, all mains, pipes, tanks, rights and franchises of heating companies, gas companies, water or oil companies. All such improvements and rights are classed with real estate, because real estate is necessary for their use and operation. A franchise, right or permission, for the purpose of taxation, is deemed to be included in the value of the tangible property, and is used as a method of ascertaining the value of such property for tax- ation.* The principal change in Article 5063, which defines personal prop- erty for taxation, is the omission of the language which permits the deduction of debts from credits in listing personal property. The knguage omitted is used in connection with taxing money at interest and other credits, and is : "to be taxed over and above what he pays interest for, and all other debts due such persons over and above their indebtedness." This provision furnishes a convenient loophole for »,See Chapter seventeen of the Tax Commission's bill, and Chapter fourteen of this report for a further discussion of this question. 36 Report of Tax Commission. some people to escape the payment of taxes on their property. It is an exemption which is most unfair, because it is applicable only to a class. Under this provision the person lending money, taking mortgages as security, can, by making temporary debts, or by adopt- ing other subterfuges, use it as a method to escape the payment of tax on money loaned upon notes, while the farmer who borrows it, cannot deduct it from his assessment, because he has no like credits. The mercantile class is benefited by it, largely, because when the assessor comes around he deducts what he owes from his credits. Thus, while his credits may be drawing ten per cent, interest the farmer or the mechanic who owes him the account cannot deduct his debts from his assessment because he has no credits to deduct it from. The law is very unjust in that it operates unfairly against those who have no credits from which to deduct their debts, and this ia the condition of most of our taxpayers. This is the unfairest provision in our present tax laws. To the money lender and the merchant it is a boon of great benefit, that amounts almost to an exemption from taxation. The amount of real estate and chattel mortgages in force in this State will probably reach the enormous sum of two hundred and fifty million dollars ($350,000,000), and the amount of credits rendered for taxation in this State will not exceed six per cent, of this amount.* This provision, which is so unfair in its operation, ought to have been repealed long ago, and the wonder is that it has been permitted to stand so long. Article 5064 of the Eevised Statutes defines different terms used in assessing property for taxation. Money is defined to include every "deposit which any person owning the same or holding in trust and residing in this State, is entitled to withdraw in money on de- mand." Notwithstanding this, the Comptroller's report for 1898 shows that only $5,865,036 were rendered by individuals, and $8,360,698 by banks, for that year. The report of the condition of national banks, which was made on call of the Comptroller of the Currency for the 15th of December, 1897, fifteen days before the work of assessing for 1898 could be begun, showed there were $41,- 336,716.81 in the national banks of Texas to the credit of individuals, as against $5,865,036, rendered for taxation throughout the entire State for the year which began sixteen days later. We will speak of this more at length in another chapter in discussing the method of taxing the shares of banks and bankers. But the condition, bad as it is, is not so bad as in some of the other States. In Wisconsin *$]8.318,920 of credits listed for taxation In 1898. Pkopbett Subject to Taxation, Etc. 31 in 1896, out of a total of $55,754,137.95, of money in banks of the State, only $3,032,103 were assessed for taxes.* The definition of "credits" is changed to include "deed or mort- gage on real estate." Exemptions. Article 5065 contains ten clauses exempting from taxation cer- tain kinds of property, towit: Public school houses; houses of actual religious worship, the books and furniture therein, and the grounds necessary for the proper use and occupancy of the same ; all public colleges, academies,! schools and buildings used exclusively and owned by persons for school purposes, and all lands immediately connected therewith and necessary for its proper occupancy; cem- eteries and grave yards not held for the speculation and sale of lots ; all property belonging to the United States, the State or any political subdivision thereof; all buildings belonging to counties, precincts or towns; all buildings belonging to institutions of purely public charity and all the land necessary for proper occupancy; fire engines used for extinguishing fires belonging to cities and towns ; market houses and precinct halls used for exclusive public purposes; all public libraries and personal property belonging to the same; household goods and kitchen furniture to the value of two hundred and fifty dollars. The Constitution authorizes the legislature to "exempt from taxa- S'""''*- *'"'■ *■ tion public property used for public purposes ; actual places of relig- ious worship ; places of burial not held for private or corporate profit ; all buildings used exclusively and owned by persons and associations of persons for school purposes (and the necessary furniture of all schools), and institutions of purely public charity," and declares that "all laws exempting property from taxation, other than the property above mentioned shall be void." It is provided in subdivision 6, of Article 5065, that the exemption does not apply to buildings and property used by fraternal or so- called benevolent orders, except their widows' and orphans' homes. The language of the present law and the Constitution does not ex- empt them, but it is deemed best to make the provision elear.§ These fraternal orders, while they are great and good institutions, are not, in the language of the Constitution, "institutions of purely *Eeport of Wisconsin Tax Commission, 1898, p. 73. +See Ked v. Johnson, 53 Texas, 384; Oassiano v. Ursuline Academ.y, 64 Texas, 674; Ked T. Morris, 73 Texas, 556; St. Edwards College v. Morris, 82 Texas, 1. 8See Morris v. Eoyal Arch Mason, 68 Texas. 698. 38 Rbpoet of Tax Commission. public charity." They are for the benefit of their members an^ cannot, in any proper sense, come -within the meaning of "purely public charijty." A minority* of the Tax Commission favored making no exemp- tions whatever 'except of public property maintained by taxation. Speaking on this subject the Tax Commissioners of New Hampshire, •in their report, 1878, said: "Equality is the comer stone of every just and wholesome system of taxation. Every departure from this principle, no matter what the pretense may be, shifts upon one class a share of the burden of taxation that belongs to another. Of this character are all exemptions, except in the ease of property belonging to the government. To levy and collect a tax upon this would simply be a work of supererogation. Beyond this, the theory of exemption ought not to go. * * - * We do not exempt the minister from the poll tax. Why, then, should it be regarded as inimical to public policy (not) to exempt the struetureaf in which he performs his public labors? Some things that testify eloquently of the Divine greatness and goodness, like air, light, heat, sound and fragrance, are beyond the power of taxation; but man himself, the domestic animals, and the honest solid earth, which speak with even greater force and power, are taxed, and no incongruity is thought of." But the Tax Commission decided to adhere to what has long been the unbroken public policy in this State, and what is permitted by the Constitution, and exempt "actual places of public religious worship," including the books and furniture therein and the grounds attached to such buildings, necessary for the proper occupancy, use and enjoyment of the same, if not leased or otherwise used with a view to profit. Listing Property. All property is now required by law to be listed for taxation be- tween the first day of January and the first day of June in each year, when required by the assessor, with reference to the quantity held or owned on the first day of January. There is no change in this R. s.. Art. 306«. respect, but property which has been exempt from taxation and which exemption may expire between, January 1st and December 31st of any year, is made taxable for that portion of the year after the expiration of the exemption as provided by the law which was en- acted by the present Legislature. *Mr. Colquitt. tThore were B,m church organizations In Toxas In 18fl0, no other State having, so many except Pennsylvania. The church property Is valued at $8,688,337 by the census ot 1830. Property Subject to Taxation, Etc. 39 It is provided that all personal property subject to taxation and R- s.,Art. soos. temporarily removed from the State or county, shall be assessed in the county of the ovmer, or in the county where the principal office of such owner may be ; and also, that if any person, firm or corpora- tion shall transfer his property from one county to '.another on or before the first day of January for the purpose of evading assess- ment, such property is required to be assessed wherever found ; and this same provision is put into Article 5070, which relates to the rendition of cattle. These provisions do not appear in the law at this time. It is believed that these amendments will have a good effect in increasing the assessments of personal property. Where persons list property for others they are required to make u.s., Art. 5074. oath to the rendition, and further, to state on oath that the property rendered by him- as agent is all that his principal owns in the county where the agent renders it. This provision is deemed necessary to meet a prevailing abuse. Often, it is said, wealthy persons, having large personal property possessions, send a clerk or bookkeeper, to list his property, instructing him what and how much to list. A case in point is where a wealthy banker sent his clerk to list his prop- erty, telling him to list five thousand dollars in cash, whereas, at the time for which it was listed (January 1st) he had more than fifty thousand dollars in, bank. Very many people resort to this method of listing their personal property, we are told, and it has been an easy Tvay of evading full assessment and making affidavit to it as the law now requires. Another change of importance is in the article requiring persons r.s., Art. 5075. listing property to aver under oath that he has listed all his property subject to taxation, and at its full value. The law now only requires him to make oath that he has listed all his property. The article is further changed to include the affidavit that. is prescribed and the assessor is required to administer the same as if in the district court. It is provided by Article 5109 that the assessor shall take down the name of every person* who refuses to make oath to the correctness *"Art. 115. If any person shall refuse or neglect to make out and render a list of his taxable property, when called upon in person by the assessor of taxes or his deputy, or shall fail or refuse to qualify to the truth of his statement of taxable property, or shall fail or refuse to subscribe to any oath or affirmation required by law in the rendition of taxable property, he shall be fined in any sum not less than twenty nor more than one thousand dollars. "Art. 116. Any evasion by means of artifice, or temporary or fictitious sale, ex- change or pretended transfer upon any bank books of gold and silver coin, bank notes or other notes or bonds subject to taxation under the laws of this State, for United States non-taxable treasury notes, or any notes or bonds not so subject to taxation, and any such pretended sale, exchange or transfer not made in good faith, and by the actual exchange and delivery of the funds so sold, exchanged or 40 Report of Tax Commission. of the list of property rendered by him, and its value. Article 5103 prescribes a penalty against the assessor for failure to administer the oasth. In making his return to the commissioners' court of his assessment rolk the assessor is required to make affidavit that he has administered this oath, orally, to each person listing property, and this penalty is to be printed on each assessment blank, as well as the oath which is to be administered by the assessor. Article 5104 makes it a fraud against the public revenues to make a temporary or fictitious transfer of property, or pretended transfer of any money from a bank in this State by the purchase of exchange upon a bank in another State, or the transfer of money out of the State in any other way, to evade taxation, and denounces a penalty. Article 5105 is along similar lines, and requires persons claiming exemption by reason of such transfer to make oath that it was made bona fide and in good faith. The present law contains similar provisions, but they have been made sitronger and more definite in the hope to secure their ' better enforcement. See 01). 17 of Article 5076 defines what the statement or list shall set forth. The Commission concluded to incorporate "franchises" as a subject of taxation in a separate chapter. Provision is made for the assess- ment of all property belonging to private corporations against the corporation, except in the case where stock of a. corporation outside the State is owned by a citizen of this State. In that case, it is assessed against the individual owner of the stock. The property of private corporations will be assessed as a whole against the cor- poration, and Chapter 17 prescribes the method of ascertaining the full value of such property. R.s<.. Art. 5088. Provision is made for ascertaining the value of property for taxa- Art. 508:jof tion, and requires that each piece of property shall be listed sepa- rately at its full and true value. In determining the full and true value, the assessor is not to adopt a lower or different standard of value because the same is to serve as a basis for taxation, nor shall he adopt as a criterion of value, the price for which such property would sell at auction or forced sale, or in the aggregate with all the Bill transferred and made only by entry on bank books, or by any e.xpress or implied understanding not to immediately make a bona fide and permanent sale, shall bo deemed prima facie a fraud upon the public revenues of the State. 2. The president, cashier, or secretary of any banking or other corporation, or any person that may be a party or privy to such fraudulent sale, exchange or transfer shall be deemed sullty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not less than ten dollars nor more than one hundred dollars, and in addition thereto shall be confined in the county jail not less than ten nor more than thirty days, 3. All assessors of laxes In this State shall require all taxpayers when assessed Pkopkrty Subject to Taxation, Etc. property in his county, but he shall value each tract or parcel of land separately, and at such sum as he believes the same to be worth in money at the time such assessment is made. This is/ now the law, and it is clear that the assessor has the right under the law to value property at its full value for taxation, and it is made his duty to do so. Yet, it is, and has been, the practice to accept renditions of property without due regard to its value, the practice being to allow the owner to place such value upon it, which is usually done at from 25 to 75 cents on the dollar. As previously explained, these values, except in a few instances in each county, are allowed to stand by the assessor and the commis- sioners' court, which is constituted the board of equalization. On account of this practice we could not devise a better way than to require oath to be made as to values, requiring the assessor to admin- ister it orally, to impress its importance on the person taking it; and further directing the assessor to make oath that he has complied with the requirement as explained above. A number of other changes were made in this chapter, but it would make this report too long to mention each one and make a detailed explanation. These minor changes will be apparent to the members of the legislature and all others who care to read this report, and compare the present law with the bill which the Tax Commission has framed in obedience to the act creating it. It has been considered best to omit from the chapter relating to assessments the mode of rendering the property of railroads ; and the shares and other prop- erty of National banks, bankers and brokers. Bach of these is made the subject of a separate chapter in the bill, and the method of ascer- taining the value of such property for taxation is prescribed. It is provided that the taxes on personal property shall be a first Art. sossof lien on such property, and shall attach to and follow the same in whomsoever's hands it may be found. Tax collectors complain now of the lack of this provision, which defeats the State in the collection of taxes on much of the personal property that is assessed. 41 by them to make oath as to any such sale, exchange or transfer made by them on the first day of January, or within sixty days before said first day of .lanuary of any year for which any such assessment is made, as to the good faith and bona flde business transaction of any such sale, exchange or transfer as above set forth, if any such should have been made by them, and if it should be disclosed that any such pretended sale, exchange or transfer has been made for the purpose of evad- ing taxation, then and in that event the assessor shall IJst and render against such person the coin, banls notes or other notes or bonds suliject to taxation under the laws of this State; provided, that if any person shall make a false afSdavit as to any of the foregoing facts, he shall be deemed guilty of perjury and be punished as is now provided by law."— From Chapter Five, Title Four, of the Penal Code. 42 Repokt of Tax Commission. CHAPTEE SIX. LISTING BAILEOAD PEOPBETY. It is now required by law that every railroad corporation shall deliver a sworn statement, on or before the first day of June of each year, to the assessor of each county and incorporated town or city, showing what real estate it owns, and the length and value per mile of the railroad, which valuation shall include the right of way, road- bed, superstructures, depots and grounds upon which said depots are erected, and all shops and fixtures used in operating the road, and all personal property, except rolling stock, and all shall be listed in the county where situated. The rolling stock must be rendered in the county of the principal office of the company, valued and equalized by the county commissioners' court of such county and returned to the Comptroller, who prorates the value to each county according to the number of miles in the county through which the road runs. Const.. Alt. 8, The Constitution provides that all property belonging to railroad ^^'^' ■'• companies, of whatever description, lying or being within the limits of any incorporated city or town within this State, shall bear its Const., Art. s, proportionaite share of municipal taxation. And further, that all '^'^^'^'' '^^ property of railroad companies shall be assessed and the taxes col- lected in the several counties in which said property is situated, including so much of the roadbed and fixtures as shall be in each county. Acting upon the constitutional provision that property "shall be taxed in proportion to its value, which shall be ascertained as provided by law," an effort is made to provide a way for ascer- taining the value of railroad property for taxation. In the chapter submitted for arriving at the value of railroad property for taxation, it is provided that the right of way, roadbed, side tracks, or any second tracks, depots, depot grounds, machine' shops and the ground on which they may be situated, and all other buildings on the right of way, owned by the railway company and used for railway purposes, shall be assessed as "railroad track," and classed as real estate. All personal property, such as tools, materials for repairs, machinery, fixtures and stationary engines, is required to be listed and assessed in the county where it may be on the first Listing Railroad Pkoperty. 43 4ay of January. All other movable personal property is required to be listed and assessed as "rolling stock" in the county where the company may have its principal oiBce, and distributed to the several counties in the same manner as now provided by law. Under the present system of assessing railroad property, no method for ascertaining the value of the property is pointed out to the assessors. The property is usually rendered at whatever the assessor will accept and is assessed at whatever the commissioners' court will agree to, the averages per mile for the different roads rang- ing in 1898 from $2,818 to $13,000.* There being no State board of equalization, and the equalization of values being left to each county through the commissioners' court, it follows that valuations are very unequal when the valuation of the different roads is com- pared. The lack of uniformity of each separate road in the different counties through which it runs, is also very marked. It is not known that the, railroads especially object to this inequality, it being the general policy to escape with as small valuation and with paying as little tax as possible, each strives for a low assessment. In this particular the railroads are not an exception. It is the practice throughout the State. But sneh policy should be changed and it has been an endeavor ^rt.sossf' of with the Commission to provide a method for changing it, not only i*'"- as applied to railroads, but to all other property. Railroad officials, therefore, are required to tile a sworn statement with each tax assessor, which Statement shall set forth the total number of miles of track owned in the State, including side, second and terminal tracks; the number of miles in each county, including side, second and terminal tracks ; the amount of capital stock authorized and the number of shares of stock into which it is divided ; the amount of capital stock paid in ; the market value, or the actual value of such sto.eli, on the first day of January; the total amount of the bonded *Austln & Northwestern, stock a,ud bonds per mile, $37,220. average assessed value per mile, S8,537.57. Central Texas & Northwestern, stock and bonds per mile. S30.744, assessed value per mile, $10,024.17. Chicago, Bock Island & Texas, stock and bonds per mile, $14,019, average assessed value per mile, S7,516.flO. De Kalb & Red River, stoclcs and bonds per mile, $372, average assessed value per mile, 1909.09. Ft. Worth & Denver City, Ft. V?orth & Denver Termijial, stock a;id bonds per rnile, $38,634, average assessed value per mile, .$6,715.38. Pan Handle, stock and bonds per mile. $34,986, average assessed value per mile, $6,715.38. Ft. Worth & New Orleans, stock and bonds per mile, $25,194, average assessed value per mUe, $8,304.69. Ft. Worth & Eio Grapde, stock and bonds per mile, $41,264, average assessed value per mile, $6,018.41. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio, stock and bonds per mile, $57,824, average assessed value per mile, $8,634.18. Galveston, Houston & Henderson, stock and bonds per mile. $60,000, average assessed value per mile, $7,840. Gulf, Beaumont & Kiwisas City, stock and bonds per mile. $17,615, average assessed value per mile, $5,314.07. Gulf. Colorado & S^inta Fe, stock and bonds per mile, $23,786, average as- 44 Report of Tax Commission. or funded debt and the market or actual value thereof ; and a list of all lands or lots and their value (exclusive of the land denominated "railroad track"). In arriving at the basis for estimating the value of "railroad track," it is provided that the assessor of any county shall add together the market value or the full and true value of the shares of the paid up capital stock, and the funded or bonded debt outstand- ing against the entire line of any railway and shall divide the value of such stocks and bonds by the total number of miles of track in the State, including side, second and terminal tracks, as shown by the sworn statement the officers of the railroads are required to make, thus ascertaining the average value per mile of the property of any given railroad. The assessor is then required to value the miles of railroad in his county for assessment and to assess the same in pro- portion that the number of miles of track in his county, including side, second and terminal tracks, bears to the whole number of miles of any such road in the State. Prom this valuation he is required to deduct the value of personal property rendered and the value of the rolling stock that has been apportioned to his county by the Comp- troller, and the residue or remain(Jer of the total value so ascertained, is to be assessed as the value of the railroad track. In ascertaining the market or full and true value of the stocks and bonds outstand- ing against any railroad, the assessor is to be governed by the sworn statement of the railroad company's officials. It is also provided that in event of failure or refusal of officials to make the sworn statement required in Article 5088f, that the assessor shall ascer- tain the value of the stocks and bonds from the best possible source, and assess it in like manner as if the sworn statement by the officials of the company had been made. Failure to make the report is pun- ished by forfeiture of a given sum for each day they fail to comply with the law after a given date, and a fine is, in addition, imposed sessed value per mile, $8,016,1S. Texas, Louisiana & Eastern, stock and bonds per mile, $23,786, average assessed value per mile, S5,0W.rn. Gult. Western Texas & Pacific, stocli and bonds per mile, 124,490. average assessed value per mile, $7,584.82. Hearne & Brazos Valley, stock and bonds per mile, S:i,320, average assessed value per mile, $4,147.59. Houston & Texas Central, stocli and bonds per mile. S56,219. average assessed value per mile, $10,749.09. Houston, East & West Texas, stock and bonds per mile. $23.6.2,^. average assessed value per mile, $7,656.86. International & Great Northern, stock and bonds per mile, $36,025. average assessed value per mile, $9,142.51. Louisiana Western Extension, stock and bonds per mile, S'T 403 average assessed value per mile, $8,500. Missouri, Kansas & Texas of Texas, stock and bonds per mile, 8-14,573, average assessed value per mile, $8,604.62. Denlson & Wash- ita Valley, stock and bonds per mile, $61,010, average assessed value per mile, ' $10,772.50. New York, Texas & Mexican, stock and bonds per mile, $23,605 average assessed value per mile, $9,343.43. Paris & Great Northern, stock and bonds per mile. S49,S28, average assessed value per mile, $9,338.49. Pecos River, stock and Listing Railroad Peopekty. 45 on the officer or officers designated in the chapter, for their failure to comply with the law, each day constituting a separate offense. Provision is made for estimating the value of railroad companies, Art. oossk of a part of whose lines are without the State, the same method being '^'"' followed as where the entire line is within the State. The value of the stocks and bonds for the entire line is ascertained in the same way and the value of the number of miles within the State, only, is assessed in the several counties through which any such road passes, in proportion that the number of miles in the county bears to the whole property in the State, the value of such railroad prop- erty within the State having been ascertained first, to be that pro- portion which the number of miles in the State bears to the whole number of miles. This, in the judgment of the Commission, is the best possible way to find the value of property, such as this. It is what it is bring- ing in the market. The price at which the bonds will sell is deter- mined by the earning capacity of the road, or its ability to meet with promptness, the interest on the bonds as it becomes -due. Of course, the rate of interest to be paid is a factor which goes to assist in making the value of bonds or mortgages of any kind. The stock controls the property, elects the officers and agents who manage the property. The bonds being secured by a pledge of the entire prop- erty for the payment of the principal and interest, the value of the stock is, in most cases, reduced in that proportion which is repre- sented by the selling value of the bonds outstanding against the property which the stock controls. The stock, , therefore, usually commands a price which represents the value of the property over and above the value of the bonds. Take the value of the bonds and the value of the stock, therefore, and add them together, and you get what the world estimates the property they both represent,- to be worth, and is what the purchasers of such property are daily pay- bonds per mile, $25,627, average assessed value per mile, $5,897.14. Rio Grande, stock and bonds per mile, 113.653. average assessed value per mile, $5,609.09. Eio Grande & Eagle Pass, stock and bonds per mile, $43,844, average assessed value per mile, $4,425.77. Rio Grande & El Paso, stock and bonds per mile, $34,739, average assessed value per mile, $10,188.59. St. Louis Southwestern of Texas, stock and bonds per mile, $30,211, average assessed value per mile, $8,565.32. San Antonio & Aransas Pass, stock and bonds per mile, $33,314, average assessed value per mile, $7,691.18. Sherman, Shreveport & Southern. stoi;k and bonds per mile. 830,396, average assessed value per mile, $7,200.28. Southern Kansas of Te^as, stock and bonds per mile, $21,785, average assessed value per mile, $7,986.24. Sugarland, stock and bonds per mile, $10,00C, average assessed value per mile, $3,000. Texas & New Orleans, stock and bonds per mile, $53,161, average assessed value per mile, $13,007.54. Texas Transportation, stock and bonds per mile, $53,161, average assessed value per milp, $13,007.54. Sabine & Bast Texas, stock and bonds per mile, $53,161, average assessed value per mile, $7,033.23. Texas & Pacific, stock and bonds per mile, $66,845. average 46 Report of Tax Commission. ing for it. If property then shall be taxed in proportion to its value, which shall be ascertained as may be provided by law, what better way can the legislature provide for ascertaining this value for tax- ation than is here proposed? But even the value of the bonds and stock may not represent all the values which a railroad company may possess. It may have beeti granted rights, privileges, and immunities by the State which do not enter into or become a factor in making up the price of stocks and bonds on the stock exchange.* Speaking through Mr. Justioe Miller, the United States' Supreme Court in "State Eailroad Tax Cases" (92 U. S., 605), said : "When you have ascertained the current cash value of the whole funded debt, and the current cash value of the entire number of shares, you have, by the action of those who above all others can best estimate it, ascertained the true value of the road, all its property, its capital stock, and its franchises ; for these are all represented by the value of its bonded debt and of the shares of its capital stock." And in the same case it is said that "it may be well doubted whether any better mode of determining that portion of the track wiiiiin any one county has been devised than to ascertain the value of the whole road, and apportion the value within the county by its relative length to the whole." That is just what is proposed by the chapter taxing railroads in the bill we have prepared. Our Constitution makes the county commissioners' court the final arbiters of the value and equal- ization of property for taxation. It also requires all railroad prop- erty to be listed and assessed in the county where situated and says that its value may be ascertained as may be provided by law. In Pittsburg, C. C. & St. L. E. R. Co. v. Backus (154 U. S., 439), Jus- tice Brewer upholds the constitutionality of the Indiana law whicK assessed value per mile, $8,980.03. Texas C^entral, stock and bonds per mife, 554,424, average assessed value per mile, i:i,.830 per mile. Operating expenses per mile for the same period. $4,474. Net earnings per mile, $',356. The report of the Texas Railroad Commission for the year ending June 30, 1898, shows the aggregate amount of stock issued by railroads in this State to be SlSTLfilCSSO, an average of S14,596 per mile, and the amount of bonds outstanding, 8239,306,001, making the aggregate stock and bonds outstanding, S364,- 816,831, an average of S39,205 per mile. The report shows total aggri'f-ate gross earn- ings from operation of the railways in Texas for the same year. S41,103,!)87.14, malt, ing the gross earnings average $4,330.70 per mile, and the net earnings. $1,1,35,84 per mile. Roads belonging to somoof the largest railway systems in Texas made earn- ings as follows, per mile: Listing Railroad Property. 49 each operating its own line of road, and together connecting the two cities. The several companies were united and formed the New York Central Railroad Company, which became the owner of the entire line between Albany and Buffalo, and operated it as a single road. Immediately upon the consolidation of these companies, and the operation of the property as a single connected line of railroad between Albany and BuflEalo, the value of the property was recognized in the market as largely in excess of the aggregate values of the separate properties. It is unnecessary to enter into any inquiry as to the cause of this. It is enough to notice the fact. Now, when a road runs into two States each State is entitled to consider as within its territorial jurisdiction and subject to the burdens of its taxes what may perhaps not inaccurately be described as the proportionate share of the value flowing from the operation of the entire mileage as a single continuous road. It is not bound 'to enter upon a disin- tegration of values and attempt to extract from the total value of the entire property that which would exist if the miles of road within the State were operated separately. Take the case of a railroad running from Columbus, Ohio, to Indianapolis, Indiana. Whatever of value there may be resulting from the continuous operation of that road is partly attributable to the portion of the road in Indiana and partly to- that in Ohio, and each State has an equal right to reach after a just proportion of that value and subject it to its taxing processes. 'The question is, how can equity be secured between the States, and to that a division of the value of the entire property upon the mileage basis is the legitimate answer. Taxing a mileage share of that in Indiana is not taxing property outside of the State. "The second question must, also be answered in the negative. It has been again and again said by this court that while no State could impose a tax or burden upon the privilege of doing the business of interstate commerce, yet it had the unquestioned right to place a property tax upon the instrumentalities engaged in such commerce. See, among many other cases, Marye v. Baltimore & 0. E. Co., 137 U. S., 117; Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Pennsylvania, 141 U. S., 18 ; 3 Inters. Com. Eep., 595. "The rule of property taxation is that the property is the basis of taxation. It does not mean a tax upon the earnings which the prop- erty makes, nor for the privilege of using the property, but rests solely upon value. But the value of property results from the use to Name. Gross earnings. Net earnings. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio $5,.S51 66 11.604 01 Galveston, Houston & Henderson 6,399 63 3,875 97 Gulf. Colorado & Santa Fe 5,244 23 864 63 Houston & Texas Central 6,865 84 2,250 20 International and Great Northern 4,861 63 1,514 67 Missouri, Kansas & Texas 6.089 95 1,601 64 Texas & New Orleans 6.699 49 2,494 71 Texas & Pacific, in Texas 5,016 63 1.015 67 OMeago, Eock Island & Texas 7,446 46 2.955 11 Fort Worth & New Orleans 6.^70 84 2,759 81 4— T. O. 50 Report of Tax Commission. which it is put, and varies with the profitableness of that use, present and prospective, actual and anticipated. There is no pecuniary value outFide of that which results from such use. The amount and pro- fitable character of such use determines the value, and if property is taxeil at its actual cash value it is taxed upon something which is created by the uses to which it is put. In the nature of things it is practically impossible — at least in respect to railroad property — to, divide its value, and determine how much is caused by one use to which it is put and how much by another. Take the ease before us, it is impossible to disintegrate the value of that portion of the road within Indiana and determine how much of that value springs from its use in doing interstate business, and how much from its use in doing business wholly without the State. An attempt to do so would be entering upon a mere field of uncertainty and speculation. And because of this fact it is something which an assessing board is not required to attempt. Take for illustration property whose sole use is for purposes of interstate commerce, such as a bridge over the Ohio between the States of Kentucky and Ohio. From that springs its entire value. Can it be that it is on that account entirely relieved from the burden of State taxation ? Will it be said that the taxation must be based simply on the cost, when never was it held that the cost of a thing is the test of its value? Suppose there be two bridges over the Ohio, the cost of the construction of each being the same, one between Cincinnati and Newport, and the other twenty miles below where there is nothing but a small village on either shore. The value of the one will, manifestly, be greater than that of the other, and that excess of value will spring solely from the larger use of the one than the other. Must an assessing board in either State, assessing that portion of the bridge within the State for purposes of taxation, eliminate all of the value which flows from its use and place the assessment at only the sum remaining ? It is a practical impos- sibility. Either property must be declared wholly exempt from State taxation or taxed at its value, irrespective of the causes and uses which have brought about such value. And the uniform ruling of this court, a ruling demanded by the harmonious relations between the States and the national government, has affirmed that the full discharge of no duty entrusted to the latter restrains the former from the exercise of the power of equal taxation upon all private property within its territorial limits. All that has been decided is that, be- yond the taxation of property, according to the rule of ordinary prop- erty taxation, no State shall attempt to impose the added burden of a license or other tax for the privilege of using, constructing or oper- ating any bridge, or other instrumentality of interstate commerce, or for carrying on such commerce. It is enough for the State that it finds within its borders property which is of a certain value. What caused that value is immaterial. It is protected by State laws, and the rule of all property taxation is the rule of value, and by that rule property engaged in interstate commerce is controlled the same as property engaged in commerce within the State. Neither is this an attempt to do by indirection what cannot be done directly— that • Listing Railroad Property. 51 is, to cast a burden on interstate commerce. It comes rather in that large class of State action, like certain police restraints, which while indirectly affecting, cannot be considered as a regulation of interstate commerce, or a direct burden upon its free exercise. We answer this question, therefore, in the negative." The illustrations which Justice Brewer uses are applicable to tho questions involved in fixing and determining the value of property. By the consolidation of several short roads into one continual line, the value of the line operated under one management, and as one piece of property, may so affect it as to make its value far in excess of the cost of all of them, or the value of all of them, taken sepa- rately. And then, the pecuniary value is estimated by the results of the use of such property and the profitable character of such prop- erty determines the value.* Thus, a great line with connections at the border running from Eed River to the Gulf of Mexico, or run- ning from the eastern to the western borders of the State, gathering their great cargoes of freight from without as well as within the State, is recognized on the stock markets of the world as more valua- ble per mile than a short line of an hundred miles, depending almost solely on local traffic for its revenues. Hence, the value of the stock and bonds is likely to be in proportion to the value of the property which they represent, as shown by the profitable character of its use. It has been customary to put engineers on the stand to testify to what cost a piece of railroad property could be replaced or con- structed for. This may serve the purpose for which it is used, some- times, and perhaps does in most cases. But it is not proof of value. A piece of property by reason of its non-productiveness or its failure to make a profit on the amount invested in it, may have a value far below its cost. On the other hand, a property by reason of a profita- ble use may be worth many times its cost. When we provide, there- fore, that railroad property shall be assessed at its full value as ascertained by adding together the value of its stock and bonds, not their face or par value, but the actual selling value— what they are bringing on the market — we have provided what the Supreme Court *"The bills in these ten cases are substantially similar. The details as to con- struction, mileage, incumbrances, and net earnings of the various roads, diflCer, of course, the one from the other. The substance, however, in each case, substan- tially shows the history of the construction or acquisition of the railroads, the operation and bettermentj, and the actual cost thereof, as nearly as it can be known or estimated, the capitalization of each, * * *. "The Houston & Texas Central Railroad Company, the successor to the Houston & Texas Central Railway Company, has a mortgage Indebtedness equal to about 134,000 to the mile of its main line, and has stock outstanding to the amount of $10,000,000, making its stock and bonds equal to the sum of about $53,000 to the mile of its main line The bill in this case avers that the defendant company and its 52 Report of Tax Commission. of the United States says is a fair and proper method. The weaker or short lines of railway in Texas now pay more in proportion to their value than the strong systems or long roads do. Thisi is be- cause effort Is made to show that the cost of the road should be the almost exclusive measure of value, "when never," says Justice Brewer, "was it held that the cost of a thing was the test of its value." In Eeagan v. Mercantile Trust Company (154 U. S., 411), the court found that "The cost of this railroad property was $40,- 000,000; it cannot be replaced today for less than $25,000,000. There are $15,000,000 of mortgage bonds outstanding against it, and nearly $10,000,000 of stock. These bonds and stock represent the money invested in the construction of this road." The court was speaking of the International & Great Northern railroad, which runs from Longview to Laredo, a branch of it running from Palestine to Houston. This road had been given by the State 13,800 acres of land for each mile constructed and the road and the land and all its property exempted from taxation for twenty-five years. The court, in speaking further of the issues in that case (Eeagan v. Mercantile Trust Company), said: "It is unnecessary to decide, and we do not wish to be understood as laying down as an absolute rule that in every case a failure to produce some profit to those who have invested their money in the building of a road is conclusive that the tariff is unjust and unreasonable. And yet justice demands that every one should receive some compensation for the use of bis money or property, if it be possible without prejudice to the rights of others." The point . which we wish to illustrate by quoting these extracts from this opin- ion is this : The value of the bonds and stock of that road is likely to be based upon the earnings or interest paying capacity of the property, and the value arrived at by adding together what the stock and bonds are worth is the true selling value, and is the proper basis for taxation. If such property increases or decreases in value by reason of freight rates or tonnage, the effect upon the State for pur- poses of taxation is, in proportion, the same as it is on the owners of the property. predecessor company have necessarily expended in cash in the construction and equipment and betterment of the lines of the defendant company about Sirt.OOO per mile of its said railways; » » * that it has at all times secured all supplies- material, and property of every character used in the operation of its railways at the cheapest market price, and at rates as low as thr same could be secured, and has se- cured and used no more than was actually necessary for the operation of its rail- ways. Substantially tiie same ailegatloa is made in the cross bill, and both are af- firmed and sustained by affidavits of competent witnesses offered on the hearing of this motion. The valuation placed upon the proiv,-rty of this railroad corporation by the Railroad Commission of Texas is, in round numbers, $21,000 per mile. This Listing Railroad Property. As to the question of the value of terminals which was raised in the Indiana ease, but which did not affect them, it is provided in the bill submitted, that in considering the length of any line, side tracks, second tracks and terminal tracks must be added together, and they go to make up the length and value of the entire line, for taxation. It is believed that by this method each county will get the full benefit for the number of miles of railroad track in such county, and all improvements thereon, in making up the valuation of the same for taxation. And what is said of each county will be true of each State where a line runs through any other State or any part of it. In the opinion quoted above it is held that "the true value of a line of railroad is something more than the aggregation of the values of it, operated separately. It is the aggregate of those values,, plus that arising from a connected operation of the whole, and each part of the road contributes not merely the value arising from its independ- ent operation, but its mileage proportion of that flowing from a con- tinuous and connected operation of the whole." This being true, the connected operation of a line having terminals in Galveston or New Orleans, such terminals receive some of their value from this connected operation of each mile of road, and when allowance is made in the bill for valuing terminal tracks in proportion to their length, due allowance is made for their value, and they attach to that part of the road for valuation and assessment in the county or State where they may be. But, some one may say that a Federal franchise cannot be taxed.* Such is not proposed. It is proposed to tax the property of all rail- road corporations as 'measured by the selling price of the stock and bonds. We are not proposing to tax the right of corporations to do business in Texas under a congressional charter; we do not propose to tax it upon its receipts from carrying the mails, troops or muni- tions of war, nor in any way "tax the means employed by the govern- ment of the Union for the execution of its powers," but seek only to tax a given class of property belonging to different chartered corpo- statement shows the vast differeace between the estimates by and oa behalf of the railroad company aud the estimates made by the Railroad Commission of the value • of the railroad's property on which it is entitled to earn some profit. It seems to be clear from the answer of the Commission, the tone of the affidavits whir-h it offers in support of Its answer, and the argument of the Attorney -General and the Assistant Attorney-General who represented it on this hearing, that in estimating the value of this railroad property no allowance was made for the favorable loca- tion of the same, in view of the advance in prosperity of the country through *The Texas & Pacific Ey. Co. has a charter from Congress. It received 3,847,720 acres of land from this State, and none from the United States. 53 54 Report of Tax Commission. rations in proportion to its value, and applying the same rule to all alike in ascertaining that value. We quote below from a case of interest on this point, but first briefly state the facts : In 1855, the Legislature of the Territory of Kansas chartered the Leavenworth, Pawnee & Western Eailroad Company, and in 1863 the Legislature of the State of Kansas changed its name to the Union Pacific Eail- way Company, Eastern Division, and authorized it to consolidate with any other company or companies, organized or to be organized under the laws of the United States, or of any State cr Territory. Afterward, the Union Pacific Company was chartered by act of Con- gress, but the Union Pacific Railway Company, Eastern Division of Kansas, still remained a State road, though Congress had conferred special aid and benefits upon it to encourage its construction. The property was assessed for State taxation. An injunction was asked and obtained, restraining the collection of the tax upon the ground that the United States held a mortgage against the road, and that it was bound to perform certain duties and ultimately to pay five per cent, of its net earnings to the United States, on which grounds, not- withstanding it was a State corporation having Federal aid, it claimed exemption from taxation. The question went to the United States Supreme Court, and there it was decided in favor of the State. Chief Justice Chase (76 U. S., p. 579), rendering the opinion of the court, said in part : "No one questions that the power to tax all property, business and persons, within their respective limits, is original in the States and has never been surrendered. It cannot be so used, indeed, as to defeat or hinder the operations of the national government, but it will be safe to conclude in general, in reference to persons and State corporations employed in government service, that when Congress has not interposed to protect their property from State taxation, such taxation is not obnoxious to that objection. (Lane County v. Oregon [ante, 105] ; Bank v. Kentucky [ante, 701]). "We perceive no limits to the principle of exemption which the complainants seek to establish. It would remove from the reach of State taxation all the property of every agent of the government.. which it runs, and the increment to Us valun due to the settUnj?, seasoning, and permanent estabUshment o( the railways, and to the established business and good will connected with its business, which has been established through a long series of years, and all ot which ought reiisonably to be considered in fixing the value of the property and the capitalization upon which It Is entitled to earn, and should pi,y, some returns by way ot interest or dividends. ♦ * * The estimate made on behalf of the railroad In this case of the co.st to that company and to its prede- cessor company of that railroad property, and the bnslnoss of that company as it exists to-day, may not be exactly accurate,— clearly Is not exactly accurate; but It seems to mo that It is not beyond the fair value of the property, as It is shown to have been built up and constituted, and to exist today as a goln':: business concern. Listing Railroad Property. 55 Every corporation engaged in the transportation of mails, or of gov- ernment property of any description, by land or water, or in supply- ing materials for the use of the government, or in performing any service of whatever kind, might claim the benefit of the exemption. The amount of property now held by such corporations, and having relations more or less direct to the national government and its ser- vices, is very great. And this amount is continually increasing; so that it may admit of question whether the whole income of the prop- erty which will remain liable to State taxation, if the principle con- tended for is admitted and applied in its fullest extent, may not ulti- mately be found inadequate to the support of the State governments. "The nature of the claims to exemption which would be set up is well illustrated by that which is advanced in behalf of the complain- ants in the case before us. The very ground of claim is in the boun- ties of the general government. The allegation is, that the govern- ment has advanced large sums to aid in the construction of the road ; has contented itself with the security of a second mortgage; has made large grants of land upon no condition of benefit to itself, except that the company will perform certain services for full compensation, independently of those grants; and will admit the government to a very limited and wholly contingent interest in remote net income." Another case, somewhat similar, but more in point, because the Union Pacific was chartered by Congress, is that of Union Pacific Eailroad Company v. Penniston (85 U. S., p. 5), a Nebraska case. In this ease the road had induced the government to accept a second mortgage for its loan, and the authorities of the county of Lincoln assessed the property at $16,000 per mile. Justice Strong, in ren- dering the opinion of the court in the first part of his opinion, said : "That the taxing power of a State. is one of its attributes of sov- ereignty; that it exists independently of the Constitution of the United States, and underived from that instrument ; and that it ma,y be exercised to an unlimited extent upon all propertyj trades, busi- nesses and avocations existing or carried, on within the territorial boundaries of the State, except so far as it has been surrendered to the Federal government, either expressly or by necessary implica- ' tions, are propositions that have often been asserted by this court And in thus acknowledging the extent of the power to tax belonging to the State, we have declared that it is indispensable to their con- and that all such rates o£ fare for the carriage o( persons and property as are rea- sonable, considered with reference to the cost of the carriage and the value of the carriage to the one for whom the service is rendered, cannot be re-luced by the force of State law to such a scale as would appropriate the value of this property in any measure to the use of the public without just compensation to the owners thereof, and would deprive the owners thereof of the equal protection of the law guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, as cited. "•* » * As already sail, the case made for relief in each of the other suits 'seems to be stronger than the case of the Houijton & Texas Central Eailroad Com- nany "-Extracts from opinion of Hon. A. P. McCormick, Circuit Judge, sitting at Dallas, December 1. 1898. in case of Met. T. Co. of N. Y. v. H. & T. C. R. Co. et al.. on motion for Injunction Pendente Lite. 56 Repokt of Tax Commissiok. tinned existence. No one ever doubted that before the adoption of the Constitution of the United States, each of the States possessed unlimited power to tax; either directly or indirectly, all persons and property within their jurisdiction, alike by taxes on polls, or duties or internal production, manufacture or use, except so far as such taxation was inconsistent with certain treaties which had been made." All the railroad companies in Texas have State charters with the single exception previously alluded to. In Eeagan. v. Mercantile Trust Company, it was sought in the case of this single exception to restrain the State control of it upon the ground that its corporate franchise and right to charge and collect tolls was received from Congress, and that the State had no right to limit or qualify the same. But it was held otherwise, and Justice Brewer cited the two cases above mentioned and quoted with approval the following from the opinion of Justice Strong in the Nebraska case : " 'It is, therefore, manifest that the exemption of Federal agencies from State taxation is dependent, not upon the nature of the agents, or upon the mode of their constitutions, or upon the fact that they are agents, but upon the effect of the tax; that is, upon the question whether the tax does in truth deprive them of power to serve the gov- ernment as they were intended to serve it, or does hinder the efficient exercise of their power. A tax upon their property has no such necessary effect. It leaves them free to discharge the duties they have undertaken to perform. A tax upon their operation is a direct obstruction to the exercise of Federal powers. " 'In this case the tax is levied upon the property of the railroad company precisely as was the tax complained of in Thomson v. Union Pacific. It is not imposed upon the franchises or the right of the company to exist and perform the functions for which it was brought into being. Nor is it laid upon any act which the company is authorized to do. It is not the traaismission of dispatches, nor the transportation of the United States mails, or troops, or munitions of war that is taxed, but it is exclusively the real and personal prop- erty of the agent, taxed in common with other property in the State of a similar character. It is impossible to maintain that this is an interference with the exercise of any power belonging to the general government, and, if it is not, it is prohibited by no constitutional implication.' " Justice Brewer said further, in Eeagan v. Mercantile Trust Com- pany (154 U. S., 413), in passing upon the point raised that a cor- poration chartered by Congress was not subject to State law, that : "Without, therefore, relying at all upon any acceptance by the railroad corporation of the legislation of the State, passed in 1873, m respect to it, we are of opinion that the Texas & Pacific Railway Company is, as to business done wholly within the State, subject to Listing Railroad Property. 6.'7 the oontrol of the State in all matters of taxation, rates, and other police regulations." This railroad company was chartered by Act of Congress of March 3, 1871, and it was authorized to construct a road from a point at or near Marshall, Texas, by the most direct or eligible route near the thirty-second parallel of north latitude, to a point at or near El Paso, on the Rio Grande river, thence through New Mexico and Arizona, to a point on the Rio Colorado, thence to San Diego, Cali- fornia. This corporation was authorized to consolidate with railroads own- ing State charters and franchises. Its charter was several times amended by Congress, and the Texas & Pacific did consolidate with or purchase the '"Southern Pacific,"* and the "Southern Trans-Con- tinental" railroads of Texas. The former had been built from Waskom on the line of Louisiana, to Longview, via Marshall. The Southern Trans-Continental had a charter to run from Marshall to Texarkana and from the latter place westward, via Clarksville, Paris, Bonham, Sherman, thence through Denton county to Port Worth, there to intersect with the "Southern Pacific," which had been char- 24 Texas, p.;80. tered to run from Waskom to El Paso, via Port Worth. State char- ters called for building a railroad or railroads along the same parallel of latitude as the subsequent charter of the Texas & Pacific. In March, 1872, the Texas & Pacific bought the "Southern Pacific" for three million dollars, to be paid in the manner set out in the indent- ure,! the same gentleman being president of both corporations. After this consolidation, the Texas Legislature passed an act to "adiust and define the rights of the Texas & Pacific Railway Com- Act May 2. pany, the preamble of which is as follows : "Whereas, By the terms and conditions of an act entitled 'An Act *"Sbotion 4. That the said Texas & Pacific Railroad Company shaU have power and lawful authority to purchase the stock, land srauts, franchises and appur- tenances of, and consolidate on such terms as may be agreed upon between the parties, with any railroad company or com panics heretofore chartered byconsres- sionai. Stite or territorial authority, on the route prescribed in the first section of this act; but no such consolidation shall be with any competing through line of railroads to the Pacific Ocean." -From Act of March 3, 1871, of Congress, incorporat- ing the Texas & Pacific Railway Company. +*'This indenture, made the twenty-first day of March. In the year one thousand eight hundred and seventy-two. between the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation created by and under the laws of the State of Texas, party of the first part, and the Texas Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation created by and under the laws of the United States, party of the second part, Witnexscth. that the said party of the first part, in consideration of the sum of three million dollars, lawfvfl money of the ITnitod States, in hand paid at or before the unsealing and delivery otthese presents, in the manner hereinafter stated, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowtedged, hare granted, bargained, sold', aliened, remised, released, conveyed, and confirmed, and by these presents do grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, 58 Report of Tax Commission. to encourage the speedy construction of a railway through Texas to the Pacific Ocean/ passed May 34, 1871, and an act supplement- ary and amendatory thereto, passed November 25, 1871, authority was given to the Southern Trana-Continental Eailway Company, and to the Southern Pacific Eailroad Company, incorporations created by acts of the Legislature of the State of Texas, to become consolidated with the 'Texas Pacific Railroad Company,' an incor- poration created by an Act of the Congress of the United States; and, "Whereas, It appears from the documentary evidence on file in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Texas, that such consolidation has been effected; and as a difference of opinion may arise as to the construction of the acts of the legislature hereinbefore referred to, in regard to the amount of lands to which the said Texas & Pacific Eailway Company may be entitled under the said acts of incorporation, and other laws of this State; and, "Whereas, It is desirable that there should be a complete and final adjustment of the rights of the said Texas & Pacific Eailway Com- pany, as the assignee and successor of the said Southern Pacific Railroad Company, and the said Southern Trans-Continental Rail- way Company, under the laws of this State, and a definite under- standing as to the obligations of the State, and to the further end that said company be encouraged to the speedy construction of said railway; therefore, etc." Section one provides that as successor to the "Southern Trans- Continental," the Texas & Pacific shall build a road from Marshall to Jefferson and from the latter place to a point in Bowie county, not exceeding six miles west of Texarkana, to connect with the main line from Texarkana west, through Clarksville, Paris, Honey Grove, Bonham, Sherman, thence through Pilot Point and Denton to Fort Worth ; and that as the successor of the "Southern Pacific Railroad Company," another corporation chartered by the laws of the State of Texas, it was to construct its line from its western terminus at Longview, through the town of Dallas, to a point of junction at ■assign, transfer, convey, and conftrm unto the party of the second pan. and to their successors and assigns, all the franchise, trade, road bed. lands, buildings, rolling stoclj, engines, tools, bonds, stoclfs. grants, privileges, property, real and •pergonal, and all the rights of every name and Idnd which the party of the first part possesses, or in which party of the first part has any right, privilege or in- terest, situate and being in the State of Texas, Louisiana or elsewhere. To have and to hold the same, with all the appurtenances, unto the said party of thp second part, their successors and assigns forever. The object and purpose of this indent- ure being to con.solidate the said drporations into one, by the saleof tlie Soutli- ern Paciac Railroad Company, and ail its property, rights and franchises unto tlie said Texas & Pa-iflc Eailroad Company. So that the two corporations thus consollr dated, in iiccordanoe with the laws under which they were created, may bepome one, by merging the said Southern Pacific Railroad Company Into the said Texss Pacific Railroad Company. The consideration above mentioned Is to be three mil- lions of dollars of seven per cent, land grant bonds, which are to be a part of those secured by mortgage on all the lands that the consolidated Texas & Pacific Kail- Listing Railroad Peopbbtt. 59 Fort "Worth with its Southern Trans-Continental branch, thence westward through Weatherford, to El Paso. By section two, the State of Texas grants to the Texas & Pacific Eailroad Company twenty sections of land of 640 acres each, or 13,800 acres for each mile completed. At this point we quote in full sections nine, ten and eleven of said Act of May 3, 1873, as follows: "Section 9. That the above grants, donations, and reservations are made to the said Texas & Pacific Eailway Company, a corpora- tion created by an Act of Congress of the United States, approved March 3, 1871, as the assignee of and successor to the rights, priv- ileges and franchises of the Southern Trans- Continental and South- ern Pacific Eailroad Companies, corporations created by the laws of Texas, with the intent and distinct understanding that the same shall be accepted by the said Texas & Pacific Eailway Company, in full satisfaction of any claim for money, bonds or lands to which said company might be entitled under the act entitled 'An Act to encourage the speedy construction of a railway through the State of Texas to the Pacific Ocean,' passed May 24, 1871, and 'An Act amendatory of and supplementary thereto,' passed November 35, 1871, or by virtue of the consolidation of said Texas and Pacific Eailway Company with the Southern Trans-Continental Eailway Company, and the Southern Pacific Eailroad Company, or by virtue of the charters of either of said railroad companies, or by virtue of any railroad franchises granted by the State of Texas, purchased or ' acquired by either of said companies or by the Texas & Pacific Eail- way Company, or by virtue of any general or special law of the State, and in full satisfaction of all claims or demands for bonds, lands or money of the said Southern Pacific and Southern Trans-Continental Eailroad Companies against the State of Texas; and the said Texas & Pacific Eailway Company shall be subject to such general laws as may be enacted by the legislature, applicable to other railroads con- structed within this State. And that all the property of the said corporations, or either of them, now or hereafter situated in this State, shall be hereafter subject to taxation by the laws of this State. road Company will own and control within the State of Texas, whether coming from the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, the Southern Trans-Continental Railway Company, or the Statu of Texas, or from any other source whatsoever, provided said lands are situated within the State of Texas. "The said land grant bonds have forty years to run from Jjilj 1st, 1872, and are to he convertible, at the option ot the holder, within two yeari; after their date, into eight per cent, bonds of the State of Texas, issued by the said State to the said Southern Pacific Railroad Company, and to the said Southern Trans-Continental Railway Company, or into the land certificates ot the State of Texas, which the Texas and Pacific Railroad Company may hold then instead ot the said Texas bonds; and the said Texas and Pacific Railroad Company hereby assumes the float- ing debt ot the said Southern Pacific Railroad Company, not to exceed in amount the sum of $700,000, and also assumes the debt of said company, due to the State of Texas,. not to exceed the sum of S250.000. And the parties of the flist and second parts, by these presents do hereby consolidate and become one railroad, under the corporate name of the Texas Pacific Railroad Company. "In witness whereof, the parties hereunto hive mutually executed this indent- 60 Repoet of Tax Commission. "Section 10. That all railroads in this State constructed or that may be hereafter constructed, to intersect said Texas & Pacific Kail- road, shall have the right to connect with that line; that no dis- crimination in regard to charges for freight or passengers, or in any other matter shall be made by said Texas Pacific Kailroad Com- pany against any of the said connecting roads, but that the charges per mile as to passengers and freight, passing from the said Texas Pacific Railroad over any of said connecting roads, or passing from any of said connecting roads, shall be governed and controlled by the laws of this State, now or hereafter to be enacted; provided, that said connecting road or roads shall not discriminate in their charges for freight or passengers against said Texas & Pacific Rail- way Company, but shall carry the same at the same rates and charges as said railroad company or companies carry their own freight and passengers; and said railroad company shall not have the right or power to consolidate with, or sell, rent or lease the same to any other railroad in this State, or to purchase, or lease, nor enter into any combination, in the nature of a partnership, with any railroad in this State running parallel with the said Texas & Pacific Railroad, or in the same general direction, that would in any way or manner give said company the power or right to control the rates of freight or passage on said road so leased or purchased; and should the pro- visions of this section be violated by said company, it shall work a forfeiture of the rights and privileges herein granted. "Seetioh 11. That said Texas & Pacific Railway Company, by their board of directors shall, within fifteen days from the date of the approval of this act, signify to the governor, by telegraph or otherwise, the acceptance or rejection of the terms and conditions of this act, and within thirty days from the date of the approval of this act, shall file a formal acceptance or rejection of the same with the Secretary of State of the State of Texas." The provisions of said act were accepted by resolution of the directors of the Texas & Pacific Company, June 5, 1873,* and a ure, under the corporate seal of siiid companies, and attested by the signature of the proper officers of the same, the day and year first ab')Te written. "THE SOUTHERN PAOTPIO RAILROAD COMPANY, [!•" S.] "By Thomas A. Scott, President. "John P. G rover, "Secretary pro tera. "THE TEXAS PACIPIO RAILROAD OOMPANY. [L- S.l "By Thomas A. Scott, President. "E. B. Hart, "S cretary." — Boolj "Z" pp. 131, 123 and 133, Deed Records of Harrison County, Texas. *"TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILVfAY COMPANY. "OTFICE, 50 KXCHANGE PLACE, "Rooms 21 & 32. "New York, .Tune i5th, 1«3. "Extraft from the minutes of tho Board of Directors of the Texas & Pacific Rail- way Company, held at tho ofljco of tho President in Philadelphia. June 3rd. 1873: '• 'The Act of the State of Texas, entitled 'An Act to adjust and doflne the rights Listing Railroad Property. specific condition in the bill, which was accepted, is that "all the property of the said corporations, or either of them, now or here- after situated in this State, shall be hereafter subject to taxation by .the laws of this State." This puts it beyond cavil, and reduces the right to tax "all the property" of the company in question, to the solemnity of a contract. But independent of this legislation, and 'TVithout, therefore, relying at all upon any acceptance by the rail- road corporation of the legislation of the State, passed in 1873, in. respect to it," says the Supreme Court, in Reagan v. Mercantile Trust Company, "this company is subject to the control of the State in all matters of taxation, rates and other police regulations." We have deemed it proper to discuss this question in this report, assuming that it might be raised in the discussion of that part of the bill to which it relates. We wish now to refer to the method of taxing railroads in other States and of ascertaining their value for purposes of taxation. The method of taxing railroads in some of the other States, is as follows : In Connecticut, by the Act of 1887, the property of the road is valued for taxation and assessed by the State Board of Tax- ation. In 1898, that State had 1,009.05 miles of railroad. The Connecticut State Treasurer's report for the year ending September 30, 1898, shows that $910,137.50 were collected in taxes from the railroads in that State. The average county tax rate in the State is $1.25 on the $100. The State does not levy any direct tax on property, but receives a per cent, of that collected by the counties. In New Jersey railroad property is assessed by the State Board of Assessors. In 1898, the State had 3,215.73 miles. The law of that State requires the railroads to make sworn reports as follows : "Section 3. That it shall be the duty of the Board of Assessors to meet at Trenton on the first Tuesday in May, in the present and each succeeding year, and as often during each year, and at such places as their duties may require; they shall proceed to ascertain the true value of all property used for railroad or canal purposes of each railroad and of each canal company in the State, including its franchises, and they shall in such appraisement ascertain : "1. The length and value of the main stem of each railroad. 01 of the Texas & Pacific K lUway Cflmpany, with the State of Texas,' etc., as submit- ted to the stoclcholders' meeting of Hay 27th. IHTi, was read, together with the resolution passed at that meeting in reference thereto. "When, on motion, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: " 'Resolved, That the Act of the State of Texas, entitled 'An Act to adjust and de- fine the rights of the Texas & Pacific Kailway Company within the State of Texas, in order to encourage the speedy construction of a railway through the State to the Pacific Ocean,' that became a law on May aind, 1873, be and the same is hereby accepted by the Texas & Pacific Railway Company, and that the President of this 62 Report of Tax Commission. and of the waterway of each caBal, and the length of such main stem and waterway in each taxing district. "2. The value of other real estate used for railroad or canal pur- poses in each taxing district in this State, including the roadbed (other than main stem), waterways, reservoirs, tracks, buildings, water tanks, water works, riparian rights, docks, wharves and piers, and all other real estate, except lands not used for railroad or canal purposes. "3. The value of all the tangible personal property of each rail- road and of each canal company." The State Board of Assessors value it for taxation. The Comp- troller's report for 1898, says that the State Board of Assessors valued the "railroad and canal property of the State" at $220,320,- 038, and the amount of tax levied thereon by said Board, payable in the year 1898, for State uses was $1,101,100.14. In addition to this State tax, the railroad and canal corporations were assessed by the State Board of Assessors for the use of taxing districts in the State for the same fiscal year, $398,018.37. New Jersey collects no property tax except on railroads and canals and this is taxed fifty cents on the one hundred dollars for the use and benefit of the State. In Pennsylvania the tax is levied for State purposes, as indicated bv the extracts from the sections of her revenue laws below : "Section 4. That hereafter it shall be the duty of the treasurer of each private corporation incorporated by or under the laws of this commonwealth, or by the laws of any other State or of the United States and doing business in this commonwealth, upon the payment of any interest on any scrip, bond or certificate of indebt- edness, issued by said corporation to residents of this commonwealth, and held by them, to assess the tax imposed'and provided for State purposes upon the nominal value of each and every said evidence of debt, and to report on oath annually on the first Monday of Novem- ber, to the Auditor General the amount of indebtedness of the cor- poration owned by residents of this commonwealth, as nearly as the same can be ascertained, and it shall be his further duty to deduct three mills on every dollar of the interest paid as aforesaid and return the same into the State treasury within fifteen days after the thirty-first day of December in each year." This requires the payment of thirty cents on the hundred dollars Company be lind is liereby authorized to so notify tlif (Invci-iior of Texas by tele- grapii, iis required in said act, and to forward by mail a, copy of tills resolution, duly (-(..rlatied under the corporate seal of the company and attested by the presi- dent and. secretary .-Extract from the minutes of the Board of Directors, June Ith, 187;J. " ■Tl„. secretary announ^-ed llial .tlu. following telegram in relation to the Act of the State of Texas, was forwarded yesterday by t,he president to his Excellency, E. .1. Davis, Governor of the Stale of Texas, In iis entirety '• -Re^nlmd, That the Act of the Stale of Texas, entitled 'An Act to adjust and de- Listing Railroad Propbrty. of interest received from the bonded indebtedness of railroad com- panies of Pennsylvania. And they are taxed again on their gross receipts as follows: "Section 23. That every railroad company * * * now or hereafter incorporated or organized under the laws of this common- wealth, or now or hereafter organized or incorporated by any other State or by the United States, or any foreign government, and doing business in this commonwealth, and owning, operating or leasing to or from any other corporation, company, etc., * * * a rail- road * * * shall pay to the State Treasurer a tax of eight mills upon the dollar upon the gross receipts of said corporation, company or association * * * received from passenger and freight traffic transported wholly within this State." And they are further taxed upon their capital stock as follows : "Section 21. That every corporation, joint-stock association, limited partnership and company whatsoever, from which a report is required under the twentieth section hereof, shall be subject and pay into the treasury of the commonwealth annually a tax at the rate of five mills upon each dollar of the actual value of its whole capital stock of all kinds, including common, special, and preferred, as ascertained in the manner prescribed in said twentieth section, and it shall be the duty of the treasurer or other officers having charge of any such corporation, joint-stock association, or limited partnership, upon which a tax is imposed by this section to transmit the amount of said tax to the treasury of the commonwealth within thirty days from the date of settlement of the account by' the Auditor General and State Treasurer; provided, that for the purposes of this act, interests in limited partnerships or joint-stock associations shall be deemed to be capital stock and taxable accordingly." In the numerous cases decided by the higher courts of Pennsyl- vania, this general conclusion of law is reached : "A tax on the capital stock of a corporation is a tax on its prop- erty and assets, including its franchises. The question of the actual value in cash of the capital stock is a question of fact, which must be determined by considering the value of defendant's tangible property and assets of every kind, including its bonds, mortgages and money at interest, and its franchises and privileges; and the amount of , incumbrances on its property and franchises is also a relevant fact to be considered, but it is not to be specifically deducted from the valuation so ascertained and determined." fine the rights of the Texas & Pacific Railway Company with the State of Texas, In order to encourage the speedy construction of a railway through the State to the Pacific Ocean,' that became a law on iVlay 22nd, 1873, be and the same is hereby ac- cepted by the Texas & Pacific Railway Company, and the President of this Com- pany be and is hereby authorized to so notify the Governor of Texas by telegraph' as required in said act, and to forward by mail a copy of this resolution, duly certi- fied under the corporate seal of the company and attested by the president and secretary.' "On motion, it was resolved that the action of the president in forwarding said 63' 6t. Report of Tax Commission. In 1898, Pennsylvania collected $1,850,232.76 for State purposes from steam railways, and $937,020.08 from passenger railways. By subdivision three of section two of chapter twenty-four. Gen- eral Laws of New York, railroad branches, railroad fixtures, rail- road structures, railroad switches, railroad tracks, and the iron ■thereon, are classed as real estate, and as such is taxable as other real property, for State, county and municipal purposes. In addition, a tax of one-quarter of a mill for each one per centum of dividends made and declared on the capital stock, where the dividends amount to six per cent, or more, and if this dividend is less than six per cent., the tax is at the rate of one and one-half mills upon such portion of the capital stock at par as the amount of capital employed within the State bears to the entire capital of the corporation, and if no dividend is made or declared, the tax is one and one-half mills upon each dollar of the appraised capital employed within the State. A still further tax of five-tenths of one per cent, (fifty cents on the $100) upon the gross earnings within the State, is levied. Massachusetts taxes railroad corporations like other corporations and calls it a "general franchise tax." The real estate and machin- ery situated within the State are assessed by local authorities and the tax on them paid directly to the cities and towns. The re- mainder of the property of the corporation, as indicated by the market value of the outstanding shares, over and above the taxed value of the real estate and machinery, is taxed by the State and the tax is paid direct into the State treasury. The description of the system in Massachusetts is best explained by the Tax Commission of that State, of 1897, and from their report we make the following extract, as illustrating it : "The general corporation tax is assessed by the Tax Commis- sioner with the aid of the returns from the corporations and from the local assessors. Every corporation must return to the Tax Com- missioner, under oath of its treasurer, a complete list of its share- holders, their places of residence, the number of shares owned by each on the first day of May, the amount of the capital stock of the corporation, its place of business, the par value and the market value of the shares on the first day of May and a statement of the works, telesram. Is hereby approved and that the formal acceptance of said act be filed with the Secretary of State as directed tlierein. " 'A true extract from the minutes. [Signed] '"THOMAS A. SOOTT, ..,,.. . "'President. ' 'Attest: " 'E. B. Habt, [L. S.] " 'Secretary.' " —From copy on file in the office of Secretary of State, of State of Texas. Listing Railroad Property. ifSg struetureSj real estate and machinery owned by the corporations and subject to local taxation within the commonwealth; and in case of railroad and telegraph companies, the whole length of their' lines, arid the length of so much of their lines as is without the common- wealth. * * * The assessors of each county and town also re- turn to the Tax Commissioner, by the first Monday in August, the names of all corporations established in their respective towns or owning real estate therein, and a statement of the works, structures, real estate and machinery owned by each cor- poration, and the amount for which such property is valued for local taxation. From these returns, or otherwise at his discretion, the Tax Commissioner ascertains the true value of the shares of each corporation, which is described in the statute as the 'true value of its corporate franchise.' The shares of many corporations being sold from time to time on the open market, their market value is comparatively easy to ascertain; but with the greater number of corporations affected by the tax, the shares are seldom, if ever, sold or offered for sale in the open market. In the case of such cor- poration the Tax Commissioner procures from the corporation a statement of the condition of the company, of its assets and liabil- ities. In ease of a refusal to render a statement of condition, the Commissioner is authorized to examine the books and to examine on oath the treasurer and directors. From this information, and such other information as he may be able to procure, the Commissiciner proceeds to put upon the corporation what he considers to be a just estimate of the true value of its 'corporate franchise.' "From the aggregate value of the shares of the company thus determined, the Tax Commissioner makes the following deductions : First, in the ease of railroad and telegraph companies, whose lines extend beyond the limits of the State, such portion of the whole valuation as is proportional to the length of that part of their line lying within the commonwealth is deducted ; and further, an amount equal to the value of their real estate and machinery located and subject to taxation within the commonwealth. * * * ^Yhe total value of the shares, thus diminished by allowance for machinery and real estate already taxed, and by the mileage and other appor- tionment in the case of railroad and telegraph and telephone compa- nies, may be called the taxable corporate excess. "This corporate excess is then taxed at a rate which is roughly the average rate of taxation in the commonwealth. It is determined by an apportionment of the whole amount of money to be raised by tax- ation upon property in the commonwealth during the current year upon the aggregate valuation of all the cities and towns for the preceding year. "The amount of the tax thus computed on corporate excess is then, collected by the Treasurer of the Commonwealth." This reaches the whole value of the property of the railroad, as estimated by the selling value of its securities. This is just what is proposed for Texas, though the method of reaching it must be 5-T. C. Report of Tax Commission. through the county ofScials, this course being required by the Consti- tution. There were 9,540 miles of railway in Texas on June 30th, 1898, according to the report of the Texas Eailroad Commission, exclusive of yard tracks and sidings.* The entire railway property of the State was assessed in 1898 as follows : 8,994 miles of railway at $ 62,761,907 Eolling stock 7,947,792 64 miles in unorganized counties 323,536 , Total $ 71,031,235 On this valuation this immense property paid taxes in the follow- ing amounts to the State : General State tax, '20c. on the $100 $ 142,062.47 State school tax, 18c. on the $100 127,855.22 One per cent, of passenger earnings 47,004.37 Total $ 316,922.06 It must not be understood from anything that appears in the bill, or that has been said herein, that the Commission are of the opinion that all the proceeds arising from the sale of the stock and bonds have been used in the construction and betterment of the road. But it is contended by the Commission that the selling or market price of the bonds and of the stock closely approximates the true aggregate value of all the constituent elements of a railway corporation, towit; The roadbed, trackage, depot and round houses, terminal facili- ties, machine shops, rolling stock, franchise and every other character of property necessary for the proper equipment and operation of the railway. As abundantly shown by extracts from opinions quoted in this chapter, the value of such railway is such sum as is represented in the combined market value of the bonds and stock outstanding against it. This selling value is based on the earn- ing capacity and connected use of all the property. The charges to the public for the services performed are regulated by law. Whether the gross earnings, including State as well as proportion of interstate charges on the proportionate haul within the State, be allowed as the basis of regulation or not, it is well settled by the courts that the selling price of its securities and stock is the proper basis for taxation. ♦Including sidings and yard tracks, the miles of railway In Texas in 18B8, num- bered 11,069. Taxation op Bank Shares, Bankers and Brokers. 67 CHAPTEE SEVEN. TAXATION OF BANK SHARES^ BANKERS AND BEOKEKS. Chapter 8 of the bill submitted deals with the method of listing and valuing shares of bank stock and the property of unchartered banks, bankers, brokers, dealers in exchange or stock jobbers. In the case of a chartered bank, the president, or some other officer of the bank, is required to furnish to the assessor a list showing all shareholders of the stock of the bank, giving the number of shares owned by each and the amount of each share. The real and per- sonal property of any banking corporation is to be rendered as such property is rendered in the hands of individuals. All unchartered banks, brokers, dealers in exchange or stock job- bers, are required to list their money on hand, in transit, or in the hands of other banks, bankers or brokers, and subject to draft, whether in or out of the State; the amount of bills receivable, dis- counted or purchased, and other credits due or to become due, in- cluding accounts receivable, interest accrued and not due, and inter- est due and unpaid ; all other property belonging or appertaining to said bank or business ; the amount of stock and bonds of every kind held as an investment or in any way . representing assets. From the aggregate amount of the assets of such banker or broker, as de- scribed in items A and B may be deducted the amount of money on deposit by others. It is made the duty of the president, cashier, or other accounting officer of every banking corporation, to make out a statement under ^rt. 5090 of oath showing the number of shares comprising the capital stock of bui. such bank, giving the name and residence of each stockholder. He is required to fix the true cash value of the shares of stock by dividing the total number of shares into the capital stock, surplus and undi- vided profits of the bank as shown by the books of the bank on the first day of January of each year, and to render the shares of stock for the shareholders. It is provided that the real estate, furniture and fixtures of the bank must be rendered in the name of the banking corporation, and if it is desired to do so, the value of the stock may also be rendered in the name of the bank. The assessor is required to deduct the value of real estate and other property rendered in the 68 Report of Tax Commission. name of the banking association from the total value of all the shares of stock as shown by the sworn statement of the bank's offi- cials, and assess the remainder as the value of tbe shares of stqek against the shareholder, or against the bank, as may be preferred by those interested. So that, in either instance, whether the property be all assessed against the banking association, or in part against it, and in part against each shareholder, the total as assessed will be the sworn book value of the property on tbe first day of January. The bill provides a method of ascertaining the full and true value of all the capital employed in banking, whether such banking be done by an association organized under the laws of the United States, State or a private banker. It is to be taxed at the same rate as moneyed capital in the hands of individuals — at its full value. This is in compliance with the Federal statute on the subject which reads as follows : "Sec. 5219. Nothing herein shall prevent all the shares in any association from being included in the valuation of the personal prop- erty of the owner or holder of such shares in assessed taxes imposed by authority of the State within which the association is located; but the legislature of each State may determine and direct the man- ner and place of taxing the shares of national banking associations located within the State, subject only to the two restrictions, that the taxation shall not be at a greater rate than is assessed upon other moneyed capital in the hands of individual citizens of such State, and that the shares of any national banking association owned by non- residents of any State shall be taxed in the city or town where the bank is located, and not elsewhere. Nothing herein shall be con- strued to exempt the real property of associations from either State, county or municipal taxes, to the same extent, according to its value, as other real property is taxed." The present statute relating to listing and assessing national bank stock requires the president or some other officer to furnish a sworn list of the shareholders with the name and residence of each. It requires, also, that the shareholder shall render the shares of stock owned by him at their actual value. But this is rarely ever complied with, and no effective method is pointed out by law for the assessor's ascertaining what the actual value is. The method of listing and assessing such property now is for the assessor to call upon the cashier or other officer of the bank for a list of the shareholders. This is furnished, giving the number of shares owned by each. The real estate is rendered in the name of the cor- poration and the shares against the individual holder thereof. So, that, as a rule, the value of real estate when added to the assessed value of the stock amounts to from about fifty to seventy-five cents Taxation of Bank Shares, Bankers and Brokkrs. on the dollar of the par value of the paid in capital. In rare in- stances the assessment amounts to the par value of the shares, and in a few isolated cases to more. But the average, in our judgment, for the State, will not exceed sixty-five cents on the doilar of the par value of bank stock. As the real estate of banks and bankers is included in the valuations of real estate and the shares of stock and credits of private banks and bankers is included in the assessments of "personal property," we have no way of ascertaining just what per cent, of the property of banks and bankers is listed and assessed for taxation. But according to a recent statement* there were 197 national banks in operation in Texas with capital, surplus and undi- vided profits, as follows : Capital stock paid in $ 18,919,700.00 Surplus fund 5,280,488.18 Undivided profits. .^ 2,665,723.34 Total $ 26,865,911.53 The surplus and undivided profits of national banks are subject to taxation now, and should be included in the valuation of the stock, but are not. According to the best authority and information ob- tainable there are 167 private bankers in Texas, but no means is provided by law for ascertaining their condition and the amount of money employed by them, nor the amount of their deposits, hence to make an estimate of them would be purely speculative. But the report of the Comptroller of Public Accounts for 1898 shows, that "money of banks" to the amount of $8,260,698 was rendered for tax- ation. As national banks render no money for taxation this sum must represent the sum listed by private banks as the amount of their capital and credits over and above their debts. This would seem' to indicate that there is not a great difference between the assessed value of national bank stock in the State taking sixty-five cents on the dollar as an average, and the amount of money rendered by private banks. The difference is represented, perhaps, in the number of national banks over private institutions. The purpose of the provisions which we have formulated is to pro- vide a way by which the assessing officer can ascertain the full and true value of such property. In New York v. Commissioners of Taxes, the shares of national bank stock were assessed at a sum in excess of the par value, and the bank sought to have the assessment corrected. The law of Few York provided that they should be as- *See abstract of the condition of national banlis on June 30tli, 1899. 69 70 Report of Tax Commission. sessed at "their full and true value," and in ascertaining this value the surplus or reserve fund was considered. The Supreme Court in the case above cited (94 U. S., p. 415), said: "The assessors are justified, under this authority, in fixing the value as we have stated. The appraisal included the reserve fund, which is as much the property of the bank, and goes to fix the value of shares, equally if it were not called by that name, but remained a part of the specie, bills discounted, or other funds of the bank, undistinguished from the general mass." The Bank of Commerce v. State of Tennessee (161 U. S., p. 135), is another ease which shows that the courts all regard surplus and undivided profits as subject to taxation. This bank was chartered by Tennessee, and in the charter it was provided that the bank should pay a tax of one-half of one per cent, on each share of capital stock, which tax was to be in lieu of all other taxes. This was a contract, and could not be broken, but the United States Supreme Court held in this case that the surplus and undivided profits were taxable. Speaking through Justice Peekham, the court said : "The capital stock of a corporation and the shares into "which such capital stock may be divided and held by individual shareholders are two distinct pieces of property. The capital stock and the shares of stock in the hands of the shareholders may both be taxed, and it is not double taxation." And in the same case it is further said : "The surplus belonging to this bank is 'corporate property,' and is distinct from the capital stock in the hands of the corporation. The exemption, in terms, is upon the payment of an annual tax of one- half of one per cent, upon each share of the capital stock, which shall be in lieu of all other taxes. The exemption is not, in our judgment, greater in its scope than the subject of the tax. Recognizing, as we do, that there is a different property in that which is described capi- tal stock from that which is described as corporate property other than capital stock, and remembering the necessity there is for a clear expression of the intention to exempt before the exemption will be granted, we must hold that the surplus has not been granted exemp- tion by the clause contained in the charter under discussion. The very name of surplus implies a difference. There is capital stock and there is a surplus over, above, and beyond the capital stock, which surplus is the property of the bank until it is divided among the stockholders." In Farrington v. Tennessee (95 U. S., p. 679), Mr. Justice Swayne, rendering the opinion of the court, said that "the capital stock and the shares of the capital stock are distinct things. The capital stock is .the money paid or authorized or required to be paid in as the basis of the business of the bank, and the means of conduct- ing its operations. It represents whatever it may be invested m. Taxation of Bank Shai^bs, Bankers and Brokers. 1l If a large surplus be thus accumulated and laid by, that does not become a part of it. * * * It is subject to taxation like other property. The shares of capital stock are usually represented by certificates. Every holder is a cestui que trust to the extent of his ownership. The shares are held and may be bought and sold and taxed like other property. Each share represents an aliquot part of the capital stock. But a holder cannot touch a dollar of the princi- pal He is entitled to share only in the dividends and profits. Upon the dissolution of the institution, each shareholder is entitled to a proportionate share of the residium after satisfying all liabilities." And he says further : "The capital stock and the share of both may be taxed, and it is not double taxation. The bank may be required to pay the tax out of its corporate funds, or be authorized to deduct the amount paid for each stockholder out of his dividends." So much upon this point.. It is the settled doctrine of the United States Supreme Court that the surplus and undivided profits may be considered in reaching the value of bank shares for taxation. And it has also been decided in several eases that the bank can be required to pay the tax for the stockholders. (See First iSTat. Bank of Aber- deen V. Chehalis County, 166 U. S., 441; Merchants and Manu- facturers National Bank of Pittsburg v. Pennsylvania, 167 U. S., 461). We deem it unnecessary to discuss this point further. It is thought best to provide for the assessment of the shared of national bank stock against the holder of such shares, or the alterna- tive, on the part of the bank to have the value of all shares of its stock assessed against the corporation, the same method of ascertain- ing the value and of assessing the real estate separately from the stock being required. It is also provided that a lien, shall exist in favor of the State against the shares of stock to secure the payment of the taxes. It is made the duty of the officers of the bank to retain enough of the dividend payable to any shareholder to pay the taxes on his holdings. This is a provision in the present law. But an additional provision is made, making the officers of the bank liable for the tax in the event it is not paid, and they neglect to deduct it from the dividends. This provision may result in more of the banks rendering the stock in their association name. If so, it is preferable, because it saves the labor of dividing what is really one assessment into many. Provision is made in this chapter that when the commissioners' Art. soqi of court may have under consideration any assessment, sitting as a ^"'■ bqard of equalization, that the court shall have the power to summon before it the cashier or other officer of any national. State or private 13 liKi'oRT OF Tax Commission. bank, and require him to testify under oath as to his knowledge of the amount of money on deposit in the bank of which he may be an officer, and to the credit of any person whose assessment may be under consideration, and providing that he can be required to produce a cer- tificate from his books showing the information asked for. It is provided also that the board of equalization may require similar tes- timony as to the value of any and all other property, its character and value. It will be observed that the power is given to the com- missioners' court, but it is left discretionary with them as to whether they will use it. The Commission deemed it best not to require the officers of the banks to submit a list of their depositors to the inspec- tion of the assessors and commissioners' courts. Fear was enter- tained that it might have a bad effect and be the cause of with- drawal of deposits on January 1st, the time at which property is assessable, thus injuring banks and bankers. The provision, there- fore, will be effective in the proportion that diligence is shown by the commissioners' courts. But some provision for reaching the large sums of money for taxa- tion is demanded every consideration of fairness and justice to hold- ers of other classes of taxable property. The amount of the indi- vidual deposits in the national banks of Texas, as shown by the abstract of reports made to the comptroller of the currency June 30th, 1899, was $44,564,966.54. The amount of deposits in na- tional banks December 15, 1897, was $41,326,131.81, and for the year 1898, which began sixteen days later, there were only $5,864,416 in money rendered for tajcation by individuals in the entire State. These figures as to money in banks subject to check of individuals given above, leaves out of consideration the deposits with the 167 private banks and bankers in Texas, for we have no method of know- ing how much they had on deposit. But it is safe to say that not one dollar of money out of ten in Texas is listed for taxation. The resources of some of the national banks in some of the cities of the State exceed the total valuation for taxes of personal property in the counties where such cities are situated.* Of course, the resources *Soon iifter Its organiziitiou. a member of the Tax Commission addressed a letter of inquiry to tlie tax assessors of severai of ihe larger cnunties, asicin? them to give the total amount of the personal property rendered for taxation in their counties for 1808, and also the amount of real estate rendered by the national banks of their counties for the same year. At the same time a letter was addressed to the secretaries of the clearing houses of the clearing house cities of the State, ask- ing them to state the amount of capital, surplus and undivided profits of the national banks of their counties, and also the amount of the deposits. Several of the assessors replied furnislilns the intormation, others did not. Two cleariDg house secreta,ries I'epl led, one evasively, but the other sent the sworn statements of the banlcs. printed, as they were made to the comptroller of the currency, at the Taxation of Bank Sharks, Hankers and Brokers. 73 of the banks show their investments and money on hand, "whereas, it is the value of their shares of .stock that is to be taxed. The illus- tration is made for the purpose of indicating the extent that money is escaping taxation in this State. There are instances of the rendi- tion of money for taxation at fifty cents on the dollar, and the rendi- tion was accepted and approved by the commissioners' court after due discussion of the question. This incident is referred to here because nothing so strongly illustrates the inequalities of valuation for taxa- tion in this State as this does. In one or two instances, in the course of administering the revenue laws of the State, parties have insisted that they had a right to deduct the amount of their debts from the value of their bank stock, under the provision allowing the deduction of debts from credits. A recent opinion of a State court enjoined the collector from collecting the tax assessed against the holders of bank stock except for the amount over and above the sum the parties claimed the right to deduct on account of debts. Of course, if the legislature should pass the bill prepared, this deduction cannot be claimed hereafter. But in a recent case reported in 173 TJ. S., 205 (First National Bank of Wellington v. Chapman), the Supreme Cciurt holds that the deduc- tion cannot be made. The case went up. from Ohio, and the statutes of that State contained a provision very similar to that found in the present statutes, and the decision fully settles the contention. If those who have money and wealth and good dividend paying securities can be reached for taxation, there will be no trouble about the other property holders coming up with their share of the debt of '^highest obligation."* close of business, April 5, 189P. So the information, complete, we obtained from but one county, and here it is: Total assessed personalty in Dallas county, 1898 67,879,150 Real estate rendered by national banks, 1898 136,550 And the report of the five national baulks of Dallas show the following: Capital stoclc paid in S 930.000.00 Surplus and undivided profits 385,509.78 Individual deposits subject to checlc 4.567.440.24 Total 85.902,950.02 There were deposits in these banlts belonging to the Federal government, and to *"Taxes are a debt of the highest obligation, and no casuist can draw a sound moral distinction between the man who hides his property or mal