Cornell University Library BS2625 .D98 1851 3 1924 029 292 228 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029292228 A COMMENTARY ACTS OF THE APOSTLES, C; Mr^pU VEIL, D.D. BDITGD FOH €f)t Mn&tv'H Unollysi ^o«>tp, WITH AN HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION, REV. F: Al COX, D.D., LL.D. LONDON: PRIMED FOK THE SOCIITV, BY J. HADDON, CASTLE STREET, FINSBURY, M.DCCCL.I. 3i HISTORICAL INTEODUCTION. Among the Yarious classes of knowledge, that which relates to what may be denominated the biography of the miad must be regarded as one of the moat important. By this expression it is intended to make a clear distinction between the mental and physical phenomena, which are in general blended together in the term biography. Where a man was bom, in what schools he was instructed, what profession or trade, if any, he followed, what connexions he formed, in what sphere he lived, where he died, with many other particulars respecting any notorious individual, possess a certain degree of interest ; but incomparably less than what con- cerns the habits of his mind, the processes of his thought, and the forma- tion of his character. In contemplating some minds we look upon a dead level, a sort of quiet lake, 80 enclosed and contracted as never to have been rufEed by the in- ward stLrrings of anxious thought, or the vrinds and storms of controversy. There is little to discover and little to instruct. There is a surface smooth enough, but too flat and tame to be truly interesting; and though they may excite to approval and even some admiration, they fede from the memory. Others there are, whose peculiarities are such, or who have passed through such courses of thought and action, as to awaken the utmost attention, and claim a scrupulous inquiry. We ask. What led them to the extraordinary changes they underwent — what influenced at this or that time, their deci- sions — ^what altered their decisions — ^what fixed and unfixed them in their revolutions of sentiment — by what motives were they urged, and where at last they landed ? There may be a great apparent similarity between caprice and principle; yet are they widely diiferent. Both admit of great changes ; but changes upon different grounds ; and nicely to distinguish these differences is a pro- A 2 IV HISTOlUCAIi INTEODUOTION. gress in the science of mental philosophy. In regard to religion this is of the utmost moment, and must necessarily regulate our contempt or admi- ration. The researches of a mind really engaged in the pursuit of truth are worthy of the greatest attention ; its struggles claim our sympathy ; its progress on this great voyage of discovery, as we may say, may assist our own inquiries, or strengthen our own faith. Few persons, we helieve, hold important truth firmly who have not ex- perienced some, it may be very considerable, alterations of opinion. Light has broken in' gradually upon them, errors have been for a time tenaciously held ; but the day of their knowledge has often been the brighter for the mists of the early morning. All minds indeed are not thus, or similarly constituted ; but we must make allowances for those that are, and gain this general instruction from their history, to look well and often to the founda- tions, that we may secure the stability of our faith. These remarks have been elicited by a view of the peculiar career of the author of the following Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles. But of this we know little more than the general outline. Memoranda, letters, and documents of a similar kind which would have interested us, do not appear to have survived the wreck of time. While these might he very well dispensed with in ordinary cases, their almost entire absence is to be greatly regretted in the present instance, as the mind of Du Veil passed through many and remarkable changes. These he had the nobleness to avow as they occurred, though the particular processes of thought are not re- corded ; sufficient evidence however being afforded that they were not the result of a spirit of vacillation, or of imbecility of judgment, but rather of patient inquiry, deliberate reflection, and profound conscientiousness. With what scanty materials of his life we are furnished we shall now proceed to supply our readers ; and as they chiefly relate to vicissitudes of opinion, they will the better prepare us for duly appreciating the present, which is among the last of his critical compositions. Carolus Maria de Veil, or as it is frequently written Duveil, was born of Jewish parents, and was educated accordingly. His writings furnish ample evidence of his intimate acquaintance with the rites and ceremonies of that people. Endowed with a strong and inquiring mind, however, the result of a careful investigation of the prophetical parts of the Old Testament was, an irresistible conviction that Jesus Christ was the true Messiah ; a dis- covery which induced him without hesitation to embrace Christianity. His father violently resented this departure from his educational faith, and even attempted to kill him with a sword ; from which danger he was only rescued ■HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION. V by the prompt interference of the by-standers. This early discipline in the school of persecution was probably by no means unfavourable to his charac- ter ; but on the contrary tended to brace his mind to more vigorous research for the assurance of his principles, and to prepare him for the brave endur- ance of contumely and sufferings for righteousness' sake. From Judaism he passed over to Boman Catholicism ; that being, it ■ seems, iiie first form of the Christian faith to which he was introduced ; probably by some accidental associations. His literature and great abilities soon rendered him distinguished among the members of that community which he had newly chosen, and he figured as a preacher of no little cele- brity among them in the Galilean church. In a short time he received the diploma of Doctor in Divinity from the University of Anjou. With characteristic zeal he took occasion, on publishing a commeiltaiy on the Gospels of Mark and Luke, to plead for the errors and superstitions of the church of Rome, which he accomplished in so satisfactory a manner to that body, that he was immediately invited to a controversy with the Hu- guenots, who were at the time the great antagonists of popery in France. The investigations of De Veil into the grounds of difference between Catholics and Protestants, which were pursued with no little diligence and research, for the purpose of refuting the latter, issued, however, in his own conviction of the fallacy of those dogmas which he had hitherto maintained. He was not a man to hesitate about the avowal of his sentiments ; but he deemed it prudent to flee from the fury of those whom his change at once converted into persecuting enemies. It may be thought that it was his duty rather to have braved martyrdom than to have taken to flight, and we must confess, whUe unacquainted with the circumstances which might have justified, or or least modified, any condemnation of his apparent cowardice, we should have honoured above no ordinary estimate the great act of sacrificing his reputation and his life upon the altar of his God. He waa not, however, it appears, in this the incipient state of his new faith, strong enough in his principles to die for them. Escaping to Holland, he abjured popery, and soon hastened to England, where he was introduced to new and important associations. In what manner he became acquainted with Dr. Stillingfleet, bishop of Worcester ; Dr. Sharp, dean of Norwich ; Dr Tillotson, dean of St. Paul's, and after- wards archbishop of Canterbury ; Dr. Patrick, dean of Peterborough, after- wards bishop of Ely ; Dr, Lloyd, bishop of St. Asaph's ; Dr. Compton, bishop of London, a munificent patron of learned men; and many other clergymen of eminence, we are not informed; only that these were his patrons and VI HISTORICAL INXEODUCTION. friends. The result was naturally that he should be admitted into the orders of the English church ; and he was appointed chaplain and tutor in a noble family. In a revised edition of a Commentary on Matthew and Mark, published in A.D. 1670, he furnishes some account of the alterations he had made, and of himself. This work had issued from the press six years previously, and contained a very literal explanation of the words, which was conform- able to his usual method. In composing it, he states that he availed himself both of what he had found in searching into the monuments of antiquity", as transmitted to us by the fathers, and of what he had himself observed during a careful examination of ancient and modem writers. The Hebrew rites and the idioms of the language, among which, he emphati- cally remarks, he was bom, instructed, and brought up, aiforded no small degree of light, in aid of his explanations. At that time he was a public teacher of Divinity in the University of Anjou, and was therefore induced, probably with a particular view to his immediate pupils, to intersperse in his Commentary several dissertations on the Divine doctrine and history of the Christian religion. These abounded with defences of the super- stitions and erroneous dogmas of the Romish church, and " therefore," says he, "since God has delivered me from that dismal darkness out of his abundant mercy, it is fitting that I should use the greatest diligence to have this my Commentary reprinted, that I may therein publicly oppose the errors whi^h I have defended ; and here and there briefly explain the weighty reasons which God employed to dispel the darkness of my mind." He further proceeds to inform the reader that he had made considerable alterations even where the controversy was not concerned, so as almost to make a new book, as well as a new edition. What he means by intimating that "now, whatever writers he quoted, he quoted truly," we are at some loss to divine. Are we to understand that he had formerly, under the influence of papistical prejudice, and Jesuitical contrivance, .to enforce an error, -willingly perverted the words of scripture, by distorting and falsifying learned authorities ? If so, it is a sad suicidal charge, yet not without its sanction by even eminent names in the annals of those bitter religious controversies which ^tated former times. These culpable perversions have, alas ! too often evinced that passion has for a season over-mastered principle, in ecclesiastical conflicts ; but they are now, we have reason to believe, of very rare occurrence. In the year 1679, De Veil published his " Literal Ejtplication of Solomon's Song," dedicating it, according to the fashion of the age, to Sir HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION. VU Joseph Williamson, a privy counsellor and president of the Royal Society. This work became very popular both among the clergy at home, and the reformed churches abroad, who, in letters, urged the author to engage in similar expositions of other portions of the Scriptures. Accordingly, in 1680, he published his "Literal Exposition of the Miuor Prophets," which was dedicated to Lord Heneage Finch, Baron of Daventiy, lord high chancellor, privy counsellor, and keeper of the royal seal. The celebrity of this performance paved the way for another important alteration of his religious opinions. The Bishop of London was so gratified by it, and so highly estimated the commentator's abilities, that he studiously encouraged him by every means, and gave him free access to his library at all times. In that library, the bishop little thought of what would be the consequence of his finding and perusing attentively, some of the writings of the English Baptists, which he very soon began to suspect were in accordance with the word of God. In the bishop's household was a young woman, a servant, who avowed baptist principles, and probably belonged to a baptist church. She was much derided by her fellow servants for her peculiar sentiments, but was no doubt amply repaid by an approving con- science for her faithful adherence to what she deemed scriptural truth and apostolic practice, and by the opportunity she had of obtaining for Du Veil an interview with Hanserd Knollys, at the house of a nobleman where that eminent individual was accustomed frequently to resort. He also became still more intimately acquainted with the Rev. John Gospold, a man of great learning, whose conversation he found both pleasing and instructive, and who doubtless aided his researches into the Baptist controversy. After some time he was fully convinced on the subject, renounced the principles of Psedobaptism, and joined Mr. Gosnold's community. His former friends, vrith the honourable exception of Tillotson, now for- sook him, and he had to seek as he could, literary or other employment. He had a mind, however, capable of rising superior to this unhappy sec- tarianism ; but was not improbably led by it to a closer examination of the earliest documents of the Christian church, and thus to confirm his confidence in the sentiments which he had deliberately adopted. Very soon he applied himself to the task of producing his " Literal Explanation of the Acts of the Apostles," in which he takes occasion, with much accuracy of criticism to vindicate the principles and practices of the Baptists. M. Claude, one of the most celebrated and learned of the French Protestants at the time, though a Padobaptist, wrote the following letter : — VIU HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION. " Sir,— " I received your Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles which you were pleased to send me, and givfe you a thousand thanks for the share which you are thus so kind as to afford me in your remembrance, which I have entertained, not only with all due acknowledgment, but also with much joy, as coming from a person who is and ever shall be very dear to me, and for whom I have a most particular esteem. I have perused your Commentary, though it came but lately to my hands, and I have found in it, as in all your other works, the marks of a copious reading, abundance of sense, right reason, and a just and ejcact understanding ; a:nd I do not doubt but that this Commentary will be kindly received by the learned, and prove very useful to all those who apply themselves to understand the Scriptures. This shows you, Sir, not to be idle, and that you manage well the talents God has been pleased to bestow upon you. The public will be very much obliged to you, if you continue, as I hope you will, and which I talte the freedom to exhort you to do, to make similar presents. For my own part, I find in it a great edification, and wish with all my heart, it lay in my power to manifest it to you by effectual services. I beseech you to be persuaded of this truth, and that you would preserve me the honour of your friendship, which I shall ever look upon as very much to my advantage. I take my leave, praying God he would continue to pour out upon you his holy benedictions ; assuring you that I am, " Sir, " Your most humble and most obedient servant, '• Claude." " Paris, April 15, 1684. " For Dr. Du Veil, London." By comparing the Commentaries of Du Veil, and particularly this of the Acts of the Apostles, with others, their real value will be more distinctly seen. This Commentary, like most that he has produced, holds a kind of middle place between those of an elaborate description, and those which, the expression being allowed, we may term more densely critical. He does not expatiate on the general truths he discovers for the purpose of spiritual improvement, like Henry ; nor interweave theological sentiments or ques- tionings, with vast masses of rabbinical or other foreign literature in the form of long and learned citations like Gill, some of which are, but many of which are not really illustrative ; and on .the otherh and, he does not, like the German critics, such as RosenmuUer, travel down the rugged path of HISTORICAL INTUODUCTION. IX critical bye-roads, to the most literal of all literal investigations, holding converse with letters, points, and punctuations : but yet he is sufficiently verbal and minute to make even the unlearned reader acquainted with the meaning of words and phrases, and sufficiently suggestive to indicate the important truths that are to be found in Scripture phraseology. Occasion- ally, however, he is somewhat more elaborate than even the ordinary expositors ; as for example, in his geographical and historical explanations in the second chapter. His learned references, it wiU be seen, evince a remarkably extensive acquaintance with writers, both ancient and modern ; and though we might sometimes spare them, they are usually introduced in a manner that shows a mind so replete and overflowing with knowledge, as to prevent the suspicion of their being intended as an ostentatious display. Subsequent commentators have perhaps in one form or another, and one after another, given most of the criticisms to be found in this volume ; but it is to be remembered that our author led the way, and it would not be easy to trace them in other writings in such rich and varied combination. Among other reasons which might be assigned for carefully and critically studying the Acts of the Apostles, there is one which invests this portion of the sacred volume with attractive peculiarity. It introduces us into the interior of the primitive church. "We see Christianity in its first elements, in the primary period of its growth, in the zeal that actuated, the love that united, and the wisdom that guided, under Divine teaching and influence, the regulations made by its earliest and most endowed disciples. We see how they gloried in the cross, took joyfully for Christ's sake the spoiling of their goods, baffled the purposes of their persecutors by an indomitable courage and death-defying adherence to the gospel, abounded in devotion, in faith and in charity, set their faces as a flint against error, steeled their hearts against the fascinations of the world, and wore with exultation the thorny crown which was transferred from their Divine Master to ' them, — " glorying in tribulation, that the power of Christ might rest upon them." We see in that age of purity and power what may well in this fill us with shame, and stimulate us to a better course. While led to mourn over our deficiencies, let us cultivate their piety, and emulate their example. The grace poured forth upon them, with all its sweetness of spirit and energy of action, our God is still able and willing to impart to us. Let us pray for it; for these are times which demand the apostles' principles, the martyrs' courage, and the RedeemeV's love. [The Translation of the Dissertation of Spanhemius has heen omitted from the present reprint, as it does not appear to have been the work of Dr. Du Veil.] A Literal EXPLANATION OF THE ACTS OF THE WnttenmLa.tmehYC.M.DuFei/,D.D. Now Tranflated into Englifh out of a Copy carefully reviewed and corrected by the Author, To which is added A Tranflation of a Learned Differtation about Baptism for the Dead, i Cor. 15. zg. Written in Latine by the Famous Fridericus Spanhemim Films. John 5. 39. Search the Scriptures. Theodoret on Ezekiel 16. ive mustfearch the Scripture Idioms,' elfe tue cannot attain itsfcope. PhotiusinBiblioth. Cod. 177. Whatfoe'ver is confonant to Right Reafon, & plainly deli'vered in the Holy Scriptures that alone is to be approved of. LONDON, Printed for Francis Pearse, at the Blew Anchor, at the Weft End of St. Pauls. 1685. THE AUTHOR'S PREFACE TO THE READER. St. Luke gives an account of the most considerable actions of the apostles, especially of Peter and Paul, in that golden book of his, which by the Greeks is commonly called rrgd^eig rSJv 'AiroaroXtav, " the Acts of the Apostles ;" by Epiphamus,H8er. SO, ruvir^d^imTuii' AmeroXuv n ^l^y^oc, "the book of the Acts of the Apostles;" Can, 16. Cone, in Trul., «/ rut irga^suv ^l^Xoi, "the books of the Acts of the Apostles ;" by the Latins (if ye except only Hilarius, who, citing this book in his annotations on Matthew, retained the Greek word) it is called the Acts and Deeds of the Apostles. There is scarce any book that treateth of the Christian religion, which so clearly explains the doctrine of truth by examples that cannot be spoke against, and truth of history attending it. And truly there is no other book, save the apostolic epistles, that intermingles these two. Courteous reader, I here present thee with a coramentaiy on this most excellent book of Luke's, which plainly unfolds the meaning that is wrapt up in the words, and that agreeable to the letter. In composing whereof I have made use of both what I could find in the sacred fountains of the scriptures, and what I have taken notice of in searching out those monu- ments which the Hebrew rabbis and fathers of the churches have left behind them, and what 1 have observed in reading over, and carefully examining many and several vmters, as well ancient as modem, and what talent of prudence and knowledge God, the donor of all good things, has bestowed upon me. In this my commentary, as in those which I formerly published on Matthew, Mark, Solomon's Song, Ecclesiastes, and the twelve lesser prophets, I for the most part use the ancient Latin version of the scriptures, as being that which 1 am best acquainted with : but I always diligently remark what it differs from the original texts, the Hebrew and Greek. I vindicate those places which heretics abuse with some pretence, especially XIV author's preface. papists, from their abuse and corruption. I likewise briefly make several profitable observations out of philology, history, geography, and grammar, where I see it necessary either for the confirmation or explication of this sacred history of the Acts of the Apostles. Courteous reader, if thou meetest with anything in these my observations that is skilfully spoken, ascribe that not to me, bat to God, the fountain of all goodness ; to me only what my hand has not well penned, and what my mind has not well conceived. Moreover, if I have erred in any place, as such cases may easily happen, I neither stubbornly refuse to profess my error, nor to be better instructed. I desire to learn what I am ignorant of, and willingly offer myself to be a scholar to any, provided (to use Jerome's phrase) that he instruct, and do not detract; for there is nothing so easy as for an idle and lazy person to carp at other men's labours and watchings. In the meanwhile, candid reader, peruse my writings, such as they are, and join your earnest prayers to God with mine, that he may make them profitable to his church ; which when I shall see performed, I shall never repent of my labours and studies. Farewell. A Letter from the Eminent and Learned Monsieur Claude, to the Author. Monsieur, I received your Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, you were pleased to send me, and give you a thousand thanks for this share you are so kind as to afibrd me in your remembrance ; which I hate entertained not only with all due acknowledgment, but also with much joy, as coming from a person who is and ever shall be very dear to me, and for whom I have a most pecuhar esteem. I have redosed your Commentary, though it came but very lately to my hands, and have fotmd therein, as in all your other works, the marks of a copious reading, abundance of sense, right reason, and just and exact understanding, and 1 do not doubt but that this Commentary will be kindly received by the learned and prove very useful to all those who apply themselves to understand the Scripture. This shows you, Monsieur, not idle, and that you manage well the talents God has been pleased to bestow upon you. The public wUl be very much obliged to you, if you continue (as I hope you wUl, and which I take the freedom to exhort you to) making it sttch like presents. For my own part I find therein a very great edification, and wish with all my heart it lay in my power to manifest it to you by effectual services. I beseech you to be per- suaded of this truth, and that you would preserve me the honour of your friendship, which 1 shall ever look upon as very much to my advantage. I take my leave, praying God he would continue to pour upon you his holy benedictions, and assuring you that I am, Monsieur, Your most humble and most obedient servant, CIjADSE. Paris, April 16, 1684. These for Monsieur Du Veil, D.D., London. Augustine, in his 137th Epistle, otherwise Third, to Votuiianui, Proconsul of Africa, UncU to Melania the Younger, Numh. 3, Such ia the depth of the Christian Scripture, that therein 1 could reap new advantage every day, if I had given myself over to the study of it alone, from my very first childhood even to decrepit old age, with the greatest leisure earnestest study, and a more happy genius ; not that it is so difficult to attain to the knowledge of those things that are necessary to salvation ; but after XAT every man holds his faith there, without which he cannot live godly and righteously ; there are so many things wrapt up in such multiplicity of veils, that are to be understood by proficients, and there is such depth of wisdom couched, not only in the words whereby these things are expressed, but also in the things that are to be understood, that it fares with the most aged, the most acute, and those who are most desirous of learning, as the same Scripture has in a certain place, " When a man has done, then he beginneth." The aaine Augustine in the same place, Nwmh. 18. The manner of speaking, whereby the holy Scripture is connected, how acces- sible is it to all, though it be penetrable by very few ! Those things which it contains that are manifest, it speaks as a familiar friend without sophistication to the hearts of the unlearned and learned. And those things that it hides in mysteries, it does not raise them up beyond our capacities by loftiness of style, so as a duU and illiterate mind dare not approach, as one that is poor to a rich person ; but it invites all by its low style, whom it may not only feed by manifest truth, but also exercise with hidden, having the same things in what is manifest as in what is hid. But that the things being plain might not be loathed, the same things being again hidden are desired, being desired, they are in some manner renewed, being renewed they are delightfully received. By these both depraved minds are wholesomely amended, the mean are nourished, and the great delighted. He only is an enemy to this learning who, either by reason of his mistakes, is ignorant of its soundness, or by reason of his distemper has an aversation to medicine. The Oolden Saying of St. Prosper, Reader, though in the sacred books thou long'st to know, Many things are concealed and hid thee fro ; Yet watch, and still pursue thy good intent, Gifts that are stay'd for move thy mind, if bent ; That fruit's more grate which hope drawn out brings forth, Things easily attain'd are nothing worth, Even hidden mysteries solace the mind ; Who gave to ask, will further give to find. THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES LITEEALLY EXPLAINED. The authority of this book, which is entitled " The Acts of the Holy Apostles," has been denied by Cerinthus, who lived in the primitive times, as Philastrius records ;^ as also by Tatianus and Severus, in the reign of Marcus Aurelius.' For whatever book of the New Testament the heretics thought to be opposite to their own mad inventions, that they presently condemned. Hence it was that the Manichseans likewise refused to give credit to this book, because the author of it writes, that the Comforter, even the Spirit of Truth promised by Christ, did^escend upon the day of Pente- cost, long before Manes, who presumed to call himself the Holy Ghost promised by Christ, was born. But seeing this book, as St. Austin well observes,* doth contain so many things like thosie which the Manichaeans themselves take for granted, and believe to be parts of the holy scriptures, it seems a very great folly that they do not also believe and allow its authority. St. Luke declares himself to be the author of this book in his proem to the same Theophilus to whom he makes his address at the beginning of his gospel, and Intimates that he had before that time committed to writing the several acts of Christ. Surpassingly well, therefore, saith St. Jerome,* " The Acts of the Apostles seem to represent a bare history, and to set forth the infancy of the growing church ; but if once we know St. Luke, the physician (whose praise is iii ' H»r. 36. ' Euseb. Hist. lib. iv. cap. 29. ' Lib. de Util. Cred. c. 3. * Epist. ad Paulin. B THE ACTS or THE HOLY APOSTLES the gospel) to be the writer thereof, we shall also find all his words to be the physic of a languishing soul." Philostratus, who flourished under Severus Augustus, affords us a singular testimony of the antiquity not only of the evangelical history in general, but of the gospel of St. Luke in particular, and of the Acts of the Apos- tles by him written. For he has transcribed into his ApoUonius many miracles of Christ and his apostles, so manifestly out of those books that he has not forborne to pake use of the very words them- selves, as the most famous Huetius "apparently makes out.' Josephus, by birth a Jew, honoured with the dignity of an earl, as Epiphanius witnesseth,^ Hser. 30, which is of the Ebionites, three hundred and seventy years after Christ's nativity as Sixtus Senensis reports, found at Scythopolis, in a private treasury of the Jews, this book which records the most remarkable acts of the apostles, translated out of Greek into Hebrew, together with the Gospel of St. Matthew, written with his own hand in the Hebrew language, and the Gospel of St. John, translated likewise out of Greek into the same language. This golden book, quite through, displays the singular providence of God in gathering together to himself and preserving his church. It opens and explains what was the beginning and rise of the Christian religion; after what manner the apostles began the preaching of the gospel; how strenuously and courageously a few obscure, unarmed, and contemptible persons opposed by the power of the whole world, while all the potentates of those ages employed their forces to "oppress the gospel, relying only upon the assistance of the Spirit and truth, indefatigably defended the faith of Christ, refused no labours nor dangers, but combated with an unshaken constancy against all opposition, till at length they became victors, and the power of God, under the ignominy of the cross, magnificently triumphed over all the pride of the earth. The chapters of this book are twenty-eight ; the principal parts are four. The first of which, in the first eight chapters, sets down the original and progress of the New Testament church among the Jews. The next from the ninth to the sixteenth, declares how greatly the church was multiplied and propagated among the Gentiles. The third part, from the sixteenth to the twentieth, • Demonstrat. Evang. Prop. non. cap. 147, num. 4. ' In Bibliothec. Sanct. LITEBALLTT EXPLAINED. 3 relates the several travels and voyages of St. Paul, to his very last journey Jo Jerusalem. The last," from the twentieth to the end, gives an account with what perseverance St. Paul endured a thou- sand troubles, hardships, and indignities ; with \yhat patience he surmounted the raging floods of persecution ; and lastly, how mildly, and with what an equal temper he carried himself in the midst of all manner of calumnies and reproaches, and all sorts of miseries. CHAPTEE I. 1. The former. The evangelist St. Luke makes this intro- duction as he passes from the history of the gospel, comprehending the sayings and acts of Christ, to the acts of the apostles. Now, whereas, the Vulgar Latin interpreter rendering here the positive Trpwroi', has used the superlative Jirst, instead of the comparative former, the words having relation to Luke's former book which he had published before : he has been therein followed by Beza, who justifies himself by the authority of Cicero, who in his second book of Invention, citing his former calls it his first. You shall also find the positive, Trpwroe, used for the comparative, former, by St. John in his Gospel, ch. i. 15, 30. xv. 18 ; 1 Epist. iv. 19. Discourse have I made. This is a Grsecism ; as much as to say, The former book have I made. Thus in Lucian, The first Dis- course of the true History, is the first book. And Galen calls his seventh book his seventh discourse. Of all. But not setting down all things. For though a person might discourse of the works and doctrine of Christ to a consider- able extent, yet to set down the whole series of what he said and did, 80 as to make a full narration, was an undertaking of that pro- digious labour, that St. John in his Gospel tells us, the world would not contain the books, ch. xxi. 25. O Theaphilus. This Theophilus, to whom St. Luke dedicates his Gospel also, seems to many to have been a person in high dignity, Luke i. 3. For the title attributed to him of mx}st excellent, not wont to be given but only to princes and persons in great authority, does B 2 4 THE ACTS or THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. !• plainly demonstrate, as they allege, that it was the proper name of some noble personage. The author of the books of Eecognitions, under the name of Clement,' the first of that name, bishop of Rome, says that this Theophilus was one of the principal men of Antiochia, who being converted by Peter to the faith of Christ set apart his houses for the public and solemn meetings of the church.- Theophylact^ calls this Theophilus, a consular person, and perhaps a prince. A certain author cited by Abulensis, conjectures this Theophilus, prince of Antiochia, to have been, after the depar- ture of Peter, bishop of that city ; and that upon his persuasion and encouragement, both the Gospel and the Acts of the Apostles were written by St. Luke. Grotius believes him to have been the chief magistrate of some city in Achaia, and baptized by Luke. But though the additional most excellent, which by several writers is frequently given to persons in high authority, as for example by Paul, Acts xxiii. 26 ; xxvi. 25, to both the procurators 'or vice- governors of Judsea, Felix and Festus, and by Josephus* to Epaphroditus, to whom he dedicates the History of his Life, and by Justin Martyr to Diognetus, to whom he writes a Compendium of the Christian Religion : yet it does not seem to be a note of dignity in Theophilus, in regard it does not appear likely that St. Luke would have omitted to have given the same addition to Theophilus when he recommends to him his Acts of th^ Apostles, had it been a title of dignity. Therefore Origen,^ St. Ambrose,* and Epiphanius'^ believe it more probable that Theophilus was an appellative made use of by St. Luke, as belonging to all that pro- fessed the Christian religion out of a sincere love of God. " Nor ought it," saith Camero,^ " to be thought a thing out of practice, seeing that Athanasius uses the same sort of compellation. For ia his book of the Incarnation, he gives the titles of happy, and friend of Christ, and sometimes both together, without distinction, to every pious and true Christian." Which Jesus began to do and teach. That is, which make to the whole of our salvation from the beginning of the works and doc- trine of Christ. Learnedly the Greek scholiast observes, that Luke wrote of all things from the beginning till Jesus was trans- lated into heaven; of which St. Chrysostom takes notice also, ' Lib. X. near the end. ' Argum. in Luc. ' In Prolog, in Matt. q. 21. * In fin. vit. suae. ' Horn. 1, in Luc. ' In Luc. 1. ' Hier. 5L « In Luc. 1. VER. Il.J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 5 where he says that Luke wrote, " ncit simply of all things, but of all things from the beginning to the end." And this is that which St. Luke himself says in the preface to his Gospel, ver. 3 ; That he had perfect understanding of all things from the very beginning : that is, what Christ, powerful both in deed and word, both taught and acted most remarkable while he conversed upon earth. Others will have these words. Which Jesus began to do and teach, to be un- derstood according to a usual Hebrew phrase, "which Jesus did and taught." Most excellently, therefore, Calvin : " Now," saith he, " we see the sum of the gospel contained in these two parts, the doctrine and deeds of Christ. Forasmuch as he not only per- formed the duty of that embassy, for which he was sent by the Father to men, but effectually discharged whatever could be re- quired from the Messiah. He laid the foundations of his kingdom ; he atoned the wrath of God by offering himself; he expiated the sins of men with his own blood ; he overcame death and the devil ; he restored us to our true liberty, and acquired for us justice and life eternal ; and that every thing that he said or did might be ratified among mankind, he proved himself to be the Son of God by his miracles." 2. Until the day. That is, until the 14th day of our May, according to Bishop Usher. In which time giving commandment. As if he had said. Upon which day, after he had dictated to the apostles by him elected, lest they should deliver any thing but what was truly divine, through the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, what they should teach and preach, he was taken up into heaven. " The apostles," says the learned John Lightfoot, " had cast out devils, and had healed the sick, by the assistance of the Spirit, but it is to be doubted, whether they had taught any thing which they had not heard verbatim from the lips of their Master. He had promised them that they should bind and let loose the law of Moses ; he had told them that there were several things to be revealed to them, which they could not bear, in which they should be instructed by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost. Therefore when he, arose, and had breathed upon their faces, saying. Receive the Holy Ghost (John XX. 22), then they were inspired with the Holy Spirit, like the prophets of old, who dictated to them what they should preach, what they should require, and what they should enjoin. And now they wanted nothing but the gift of tongues, that they might 6 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. I. be able to deliver what was dictated to them in the proper lan- guages of those to whom they should speak. " Which he had chosen. That is, whom he created his messengers, to publish the doctrine of the gospel two years before he suffered over all Judea, and after his resurrection over all the world. These messengers Christ called his apostles, or envoys. Luke vi. 13. Thus formerly the emperors of the east, and popes, called their legates envoys, as is frequently apparent from Ana- stasius the Bibliothecarian, and others. He was taken up. That is, by the interposition of a cloud he was taken from the sight of men, as is said below, ver. 9. 3. To whom, &c. As if he had said: And that the apostles might be most credible and substantial witnesses of the resurrection of Christ, upon the truth of which is founded all the majesty of the gospel, he, being restored from the grave, by most solid and incontrovertible arguments proved himself to be truly risen from the dead, as often as he showed himself visible to his apostles, during the forty days between his resurrection and ascension ; ,and discoursed with them concerning the kingdom of God. He showed himself alive. That is, ocularly proved himself to be risen. After- his passion. That is, after he had been put to a most ignominious death, for the sake of our salvation. By many proofs. A Hebraism ; that is, by many evident signs, that had the force of a most powerful and irresistible proof. The Greek calls " theses" proofs, rtK/jiripia, " which word signifieth," says Beza, as Quintilian affirms out of Aristotle,^ "signs necessary and indubi- table : as these actions, speaking, walking, eating, drinking, are un- doubted signs of life." To appear publicly in sight, ai^d to be felt by the hands, are certain signs of a real natural body. Also the wounds of the hands, feet, and side, were indubitable signs that the same body rose that was crucified and pierced with a lance. The blood and water flowing from his wounded side, was for a cer- tainty a sign of the parts about the heart being wounded, and of death. These were therefore the signs by which St. Luke affirms that Christ confirmed his resurrection; of which he treats more fully in his gospel. Being seen. Often and long together. For it was but neces- sary that Christ, in regard of the infirmity of his disciples, ' Lib. V. cap. 9. VER. IV.] LITJSRALLY EXPLAINED. 7 should converse with them both frequently, and for a good while together, to the end they might have a full assurance of his resur- rection. For we know how difficultly they were induced to believe it ; and how at first, when he appeared to them, they thought it only a delusion of the sight, and that it had been only some ap- parition that deceived them. And speakinff of the kingdom of God. That is, of the spiritual kingdom, the possession of which Christ was to take upon his ascent into heaven. The apostles were as yet but ignorant in many points of faith, which before the suflfering of Christ, being blinded by their own prejudices, they could not sufficiently appre- hend, though they had frequently heard them from his mouth. Therefore, after his resurrection, he delayed his ascension forty days, and took in that interval as much time as he thought to be sufficient, to instruct his disciples in what was necessa,ry for them to know, to the end they might the more faithfully perform the function which they were to undertake. 4. AufL being assembled together. The Greek word is, " using one common table," or eating the same salt and meat together. Whence the proverb. To have eaten many bushels, of salt with any one, is the same thing as to have had long converse with any one. Says the most learned Sir Edward Leigh,* "There are some that en- deavour to prove by examples, that the Greek word signifies properly the rallying of soldiers dispersed in pursuit after a battle won : or, as when a shepherd gathers his scattered sheep into one fold. Which significations agree very exactly to the sense of this place, because Christ doth re-collect his disciples dispersed like scattered sheep, and give them instructions for the spiritual warfare which they were to undergo." The same author in the same place affirms the Greek word to be .a military word, and to signify the pitching of the victor captain in the field of battle. The most learned Lightfoot deduces the word (xwaXiZofuvog, not from hals, which signifies salt, but from halia, which signifies an assembled congregation. But whereas Christ, after his resurrec- tion, never appeared to his disciples but of a sudden, and when he was least expected, but only upon the mountain of Galilee, Matt, xxviii. 6, where he had appointed a meeting, that most learned man refers this verse to that meeting, as if this were the sense of the words ; Jesus a little before his ascent into heaven being met ' In his Critica Sacra. 8 THE ACTS OF THiS HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. I. in an assembly of five hundred of the brethren, 1 Cor. xv. 6, upon the mountain of Galilee, according to his own appointment, finding his disciples not willing to return to Jerusalem still as it were reeking with his blood without his express order, he com- manded them to repair thither forthwith, and not to stir from thence, until they had received the Holy Ghost according to his promise. They should wait for the -promise of. the Father. Thus he calls, both here and Luke xxiv. 49, the gift of the Holy Ghost promised by the Father to all believers, Isa. xliv. 3 ; Ezek. xxxvi. 26, 27 ; and Joel ii. 28. Which, saith he, ye have heard from my mouth. As if he had said: the performance of which promise I have told you that I will make good to you, Luke xxiv. 49. 4- passing like to this, from an oblique to a direct speech, is frequent in history. 5. Because John, &c. As if he had said. Because within a few days ye shall find by experience, how truly my forerunner John said formerly that he baptized indeed with water, but that I would baptize with the Holy Ghost. See our literal explication on Matt. iii. 11. . Shall he baptized. The Greek word fiawri^siv, says Casaubon, is to dip or plunge, as if it were to dye colour. In which sense the apostles may be truly said to have been baptized. For the house in which this was done was filled with the Holy Ghost. So that the apostles may seem to have been plunged into it, as into a large fish-pond. Hence CEcumenius,, upon Acts ii. 2 : " A wind filled the whole house, that it seemed like a fish-pond; because it was promised to the apostle's, that they should be bap- tized with the Holy Ghost." Not many days hence. Christ seems as it were to point out with his finger those few days between the time wherein he had charged his disciples not to stir out of Jerusalem, and the approach- ing Pentecost. 6. When they therefore were all met. That is, all the apostles at Jerusalem. - They asked him. When he appeared to them upon the very day of his ascent into heaven, as appears out of the 1 Cor. xv. 7 ; Luke xxiv. 50, 51, compared together, Wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom of Israel ? That is. Now thou art again risen from the dead, wilt thou reign over VES. VIII.] " LITEKALLY EXPLAINED. 9 the Israelites after the manner of other kings, and free them from the yoke of the heathens ? Christ had really proposed to restore the kingdom of Israel, but not the earthly and worldly kingdom, as both now and at other times the apostles imagined ; but by re- calling that people from their incredulity to the knowledge of himself, that he might rule in the midst of' them by the power of his gospel ; which St. Paul foretells shall be, Rom. xi. 25, &c. ; but by reason their minds were clouded with worldly thoughts, they could not yet understand this mystery. Christ, therefore, contenting himself to restrain their curiosity as to the point of time when it should come to pass, and which it nothing concerned them to know, adds to his answer, But you shall receive the power of the Holy Ghost upon you. As if he had said, That heavenly Doctor, whom I shall send to you, shall instruct you as to that which now ye seek from me ; that is to say, what that future restitution of the kingdom of Israel shall be, which you expect. Though as to the time, that is a secret which my Father thinks not proper as yet to reveal to you, in regard that without that knowledge you may perform the work committed to your charge. Some are of. opinion that the kingdom of Israel was . then restored by Christ, when the church of Christ, which is the spiritual Israel, began to be governed by Christian kings and princes; such as were three hundred years after the birth of Christ, Constantino the Great, and several other emperors ; but the first interpretation seems to be the best. For though under those princes, the church rested from persecution, yet ambition, covetousness, and many other evils got footing in it, so that the kingdom could not be then truly said [to be] restored to Israel. It is not your business to know times, &c. As if he had said. It is not proper nor expedient for you ; according to the common English version, It is not for you. It is not a thing permitted for you to know to what point of time the restoration of the king- dom of Israel is reserved, in regard this is one of those mysteries which the heavenly Father will have lie hid, and to be at his disposal to act as he pleases, otherwise than men look for, and beyond the reach of human capacity. "It is the custom of Christ," saith Grotius, " to refer secret dispensations to the Father," Matt. XX. 23; Mark xiii. 32. See our literal expositions upon those places. 8. But ye shall receive, &c. As if he had said. But I will supply 10 THE ACTS OF XHE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. I. that power, which I know you want at present from heaven; and will fill your breasts with the celestial Spirit, that you may learn with patience to expect the promised restoration of Israel's kingr dom, not the earthly as you vainly now dream, but the spiritual dominion of the Jews : and in the meantime, be zealous to publish to all the world the doctrine of the gospel, and by your testimony to confirm my resurrection, which not being believed the whole gospel falls. And ye shall be witnesses unto me, &c. St Austin saith,' " It was not so said to the apostles, ye shall he loitnesses unto me, &c., as if they alone to whom the words were spoken, were to fulfil so great a trust, but as he seems to have spoken to them alone that other saying of his. Behold I am with you to the end of the world, &c. Which, nevertheless, who does not understand to have been promised to the whole church, which, while some die, others are born, shall remain to the end of time? As he speaks again to them what does not at all concern them, and yet is so spoken to them, as if it concerned nobody else : when ye behold, all these things, know ye that it is at the doors. For whom does this concern unless ourselves, who' shall be then in the flesh, when all those things come to be fulfilled? How much more that, in doing of which they were to bear a great share, though the same act was also to be continued by their successors ?" In Jerusalem. It behoved the apostles to begin the preaching ,of the gospel in> Jerusalem, that the prophecies might be fulfilled, Isa. ii. 2, 3 ; Mich. iv. 1, 2. See what we have said upon the word Jerusalem, Matt. ii. 3. And in all Judea. The word Judea is here used in the dilated sense ; which, when Christ was upon the earth, was divided into six parts ; to wit, into Galilee, Samaria, and Judea, strictly taken, which lay on this side Jordan, and reached to the Mediterranean Sea ; and into Trachonitis, Iturea, or Perea, and Idumea, that lie beyond Jordan, and are seated in the midland country. Christ, therefore, would have the Jews enjoy their privileges, till they~ themselves, through their Impiety and perverseness, forfeited and lost them. For he does not indulge the preaching of the gospel either, to the Samaritans or Gentiles, before it was offered to the nation of the Jews ; for that he was sent by the Father [as] minister of the circumcision, to perform those promises which were formerly ' Epist. 199, N. 49, novre edit. Parisiensif. VEkI Vm.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 11 made to the patriarchs of the Jews, Kom. xv. 8. See our literal explication upon Matt. x. 5. AtuI Samaria. As if he had said, Out of all Judea, taken in the dilated signification, I do not except Samaria, as formerly. Matt. X. 5 ; but in express words I enjoin you to preach the gospel as well in Samaria, as in the other provinces of Judea. Philip the (^eacon, in obedience to this command, was the first who preached up Jesus in Samaria, which was approved by, the apostles sending to the Samaritans Peter and John, who by imposition of hands, communicated the Holy Ghost to the be- lieving Samaritans, ch. viii. 17. Now, Samaria is a province of Palestine, lying between Judea, strictly taken, to the south, and Galilee to the north, comprehending the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh on this side Jordan : so called from the metropolitan city of the whole country, deriving its name from a mountain, as the mountain took its name from one Somer or Shemer, who was lord of it, 1 Kings xvi. 24. In this city of Samaria, built by Amri or Omri, king of Israel, the kings who ruled the ten tribes that were rent from the house of David kept their seat, till Shalmaneser; king of Assyria, carried away captive their last king, Hoshea, and with him, having taken the city of Samaria itself after three years' siege, all the ten tribes, and then dispersed them over Media to prevent their revolting. Some years after that, Esarhaddon, the nephew of Shalmaneser, — who is also called Asnappar the great and noble by Ezra, as also Asbazareth, Ezra iv. 10 ; 3 Esd. xv. 69 : by Ptolemy Assaradin, and by Josephus Asseradoch, the youngest son of Sennacherib, who succeeded his father, slain by his eldest sons,-^gathered a confused multitude of inhabitants together out of the provinces of the Cuthaeans, Baby- lonians, Hamathaeans, Sepharvaimites, and Chavaeans, and sent them to re-people the country which his grandfather had emptied of the Israelites, to possess henceforth Samaria as their own inherit- ance, and dwell in the cities thereof, 2 Kings xvii. 24; Ezra iv. 2, 10 ; 3 Esd. XV. 69. These new inhabitants were by the Greeks called Samarites, not because the Assyrians in their language call keepers or guardians Samarites, as aflSrms Sulpitius Severus; but because they inhabited Samaria ; and Cuthaeans by the Hebrews, because the chiefest part of them came out of Cuth, a pirovincB of Persia, so called from the river Cuthah upon which it 12 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. I. borders, as Josephus testifies.' These Cuthjeans, when they first inhabited Samaria, did not worship the God of Israel, but each of them adored the idols of his own country ; but many of them having been therefore destroyed by lions, Esarhaddon took care to send to the remnant one of the priests which his grandfather Shalmaneser had carried away captive. This priest residing at Bethel taught the inhabitants the worship of God, after the manner of Jeroboam. Of the Samaritans thus, adoring their ancient idols, together with their new calf, it is said, 2 Kings xvii. 25, 33, 41 : They feared the Lord, and they feared not the Lord] there being a small difference between adoring many gods and no god at all. They had a temple built them at lengh by Sanballat, upon Mount Gerizim, where the blessings were pronounced, Deut. xi. 29, in imitation of the temple of Jerusalem, which temple, Hircan, the high priest of the Jews, afterwards destroyed, two hundred years after it had been built, as Josephtis reports.'' However, though the temple was destroyed, the Samaritans con- tinued their divine worship upon the same mountain still, John iv. 20 : having, not by any scripture rule, as the Jews had for worshipping upon Mount Sion, but by the example of the patriarchs, designed that place for the public worship of God, Gen. xii. 6, 7 ; xxxiii. 18, 20. Thus Abraham and Jacob are said to have built an altar near to Sichem, threescore furlongs distant from the city of Samaria, Judg. ix. 7. But seeing that the Mount Gerizim overlooked Sichem,^ and that the patriarchs made choice of moun- tains for the building of altars, it is probably conjectured that the patriarchs Abraham and Jacob did rear an altar to God upon Mount Gerizim, Gen. xxii. 2 ; 2 Sam. xxiv. 18 ; 2 Chron. i. 3. " Now," says Thomas de Pinedo, the Portuguese, " The Saniaritans only believed the Pentateuch of the omniscient Moses, and thence arose the hatred between them and the Hebrews. For, as sin entered the world by the law, so hatred invades par- ticular societies through diversity of religion, with which distemper, men of obscure birth and illiterate, labour ; the noble and learned hate the vices, not the men, because they follow this or that religion. Whence it was, that the Samaritans traduced the high ~ priest Eli as a magician, for that he translated the sacrifices and the worship of God, out of a schismatical boldness, to Shiloh, con- trary to the command of God. They also condemned Samuel the ' Antiq. lib. ix. cap. U. ' Ibid. lib. xiii. cap. 17. ° Ibid. lib. xi. cap.'s. VEH. VIU.] LITERAIXY EXPLAINED. 13 j)rophet for a magician, as appears by the Samaritan Chronicles ; the epitome of which is set forth by Hottinger in his Antimorinian Exercitations upon the Samaritan Pentateuch. ' Nor were the Jews behindhand with the Samaritans. For Aben Ezra, the most learned of the Hebrews, upon the book of^sther: 'The Cuthasans,' saith he, ' instead of those words of Genesis, In the beginning God created, have put. In the beginning Asima created, which Asima was an idol in the shape of a goat.' Benjamin Tudelensis, in his Itinerary reports, that the Samaritans wanted the three Hebrew guttural letters, he, cheth, and ain; both which are false, for that neither are those guttural letters wanting in any of the Samaritan Pentateuchs. Neither was Asima, but Nergal, the idol of the Cuthseans, of whom consisted the greatest number of the Samaritans," 2 Kings xvii. 30. Many other such stories the Jews invented, in hatred of the Samaritans ; as how they wor- shipped a dove, and were circumcised in veneration of that creature ; and that they worshipped the images that were brought by Jacob out of Assyria, and lay buried behind Shechem, under a turpentine tree. To this, the learned Pinedo, " I make no doubt," saith he, " but that they worshipped the image of a dove, in regard they were subject to the empire of the Assyrians : for that the kings of Assyria always bare in their ensigns the figure of a dove, ever since the reign of Semiramis. To which Jeremiah alludes, ch. xxv. 38, where, 'from the face of the anger of the dove,' ^ is no more than from the face of the anger of the kings of Assyria ; in regard the kings of Assyria carry the figure of a dove in their standards, as now the kings of Spain and the emperor bear the lion and the eagle." But the Samarites abolished all worship of idols from the time that Sanballat built them a temple upon Mount Gerizim, after leave obtained from Alexander the Great, and made Manasseh, his son-in-law, and brother of Jaddi, the .first high-priest, to officiate therein. And whereas Epiphanius aflSrms, that the Samarites celebrated the feast of Pentecost, and the paschal feast in Autumn, so Scaliger asserts it to be untrue. But this is certain, that when the Jews lived in prosperity, the Samaritans affirmed themselves to be Jews, de- I'Cap. 4]. ' [Authorized version, Because of the fierceness of the oppressor, pifi ''JBTp nji'n. Gesenius translates this, the anger of the oppressive sword, i^Jn'tl is found translated dooe in Gen. viii. 8, and Lev. v. 7. 14 THE ACTS OP THE HOLT APOSTLES [cHAP. I. scended from the grandchildren of Joseph, Epbraim, and Manasseh; but when the Jews were in adversity, then they would neither acknowledge themselves to be Jews, nor to be allied to them by any tie of blood or relation whatsoever. And unto the uttermost part of the earth. To the intent that the doctrine of salvation might be published to all the corners of the world. Thus was fulfilled that prophecy of Isaiah, ch. xlix. 6, with others of the same nature, that Christ was given as a light to the Gentiles, and to be the salvation of God unto the ends of the earth. 9. And when he had spoken these things. Supply out of Luke xxiv. 50, 51. He led out his apostles as far as Bethany, a village belonging to Mary and Martha, the sisters of Lazarus, about fifteen furlongs from Jerusalem, John xi. 18, and stretching forth his supplicating hands, he blessed them. The ceremony of benedic- tion, saith Grotius,"^ was wont to. be solemnized with the imposition of hands, as we find by the story of Isaac and Jacob, Gen. xxvii. 4, 7, 12, 19, 21, 22; xlviii. 9, 14, 15, &c. But when the blessing was to be given to many, then, for the quicker despatch, only the stretching forth, or lifting up of the hands, was used toward them that were to be blessed : thus Aaron lifted up his hand toward the people, and blessed them. Lev. ix. 22; that is, prayed for their prosperity and success. While they beheld. He did not disappear, nor become invisible, privately or remote from company, as Luke xxiv. 31, but by degrees; while the disciples beheld the action, he was by the Divine power raised, or drawn up to a cloud, which soon received him, and conveyed him out of their sight. But as Christ after his resurrection would not be promiscuously seen by. all, so did he not admit every one to be witnesses of his ascension, as designing that mystery of faith to be rather known by the preaching of the gospel than by ocular testimony. " This shows the vigour of great -minds," saith Leo,^ " this the true light of faithful souls, undoubtedly to believe what they do not behold with the corporeal eye, and there to fix their desire where they cannot reach with tlieir most piercing sight. Which piety, how should it breed in our hearts, should our salvation consist only in those things which are obvious to the sense ?" Thus St. Austin,' " The faith of those who will see God, while they are in their pilgrimage and cleaning ' Upon Luke xxiv. SO. ' Serm. 2, de Ascens. ^ Tract 68, in Johan. VER. IX. J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 15 their hearts, believes what it sees not. The merit accrues by- believing ; the reward is seeing afterwards. Let the Lord go and prepare a place. Let him go, that he may not be seen ; let him be concealed, that he may be believed : for then the place will be prepared, when our life is according to faith. Let us desire him in whom we believe, that being desired he may be enjoyed. The desire out of love is the preparation of the mansion." He was lifted up. Supply out of Luke xxiv. 51, While he blessed them. Thus Plautus uses the word, " Take this stone," saith he, " and lift it up." Sulpitius Severus hath these words :' " This is wonderful," saith he, " that the place whereon Christ set his last footsteps, when he was taken up in a cloud into heaven, should still continue marked out, and could not be paved with the rest of the place about it. For whatsoever else was applied, the earth disdaining human workmanship, refused, while the stones flew in the faces of them that attempted it. Yea, it is such a lasting monument of the dust being trampled by Divine feet, that the impression of the footsteps still remains. And though the multi- tude of believers every day carry away some parcels of the place where our Lord set his feet, yet the sand is not diminished, and the earth that received the mark of the footsteps Still preserves the same form." That men have endeavoured in vain from time to time to cover or pave the place still preserving the footsteps of our Lord, Pseudo- Jerome,^ Paulinus,^ and Bede,* have delivered in their writings. But in regard there is no mention made of any such miracle either by Eusebius, Socrates, Theodoret, Sozomen, or Nicephorus, we may thence conjecture the liberty which former ages took to frame little stories of their own, merely to impose upon the ignorant people. Neither do the mythologists agree in this fable. For Baronius,^ following Burchardus, will have these footsteps imprinted in stone, Paulinus in the green turf, Sulpitius Severus in dust or sand, Pseudo-Jerome and Bede upon the ground in the earth itself. Which of these must we believe ? Cer- tainly none of them. Nor does Pseudo-Jerome affirm that he ever saw these imprinted footsteps, but only says, "as is reported." But one eye-witness is better than ten heSr-say testimonies. Hornius believes this fable arose from the words of Eusebius misunderstood. For he, speaking of Helena's arrival in Judea,^ ' Lib. ii. Hist. Sac. ' Lib.- de Loc. Act. ApoBt. ' In Ep. ad Sever. * De Loc. Sanct. cap. 7. ' A.D. 34, 11. 232. " Lib. iii. de Vit. Const, cap. 41. 16 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. I. " Then," saith he, " she gave decent reverence to the places where the steps of our Saviour had trod." Which was not spoken particularly of Mount Olivet, but in general of all Judea, " where Christ as man was born, where he set his sacred footsteps, where walked his adorable feet, where so many and so great miracles were wrought by him."' A cloud received him out of their sight. Not that the cloud, which having received Christ took him from the sight of the apostles, was to him any assistance in his ascension ; for a cloud is no solid body that can afford any such help. Besides, the highest clouds do not rise above a mile or two above the earth, being only nourished by the exhalations of the land and water ; but it was for state and grandeur. Thus it is said of God himself. Who maketh the clouds his chariot, Ps. civ. 3. And that other. He maheth darkness his secret place, Ps. xviii. 11. For obscurity and gloominess get devotion and reverence to sacred things. 10. And while they looked. That is, with more eager eyes and diligent marking. As he went up. That is, into heaven, as appears by the follow- ing verse. Behold two men. That is to say, angels in human shape. In white apparel. White, of all colours, is the most pure and spotless ; it admits no defilement, and borrows nothing from any other mixture ; therefore it is the most proper emblem of candour of mind, justice, and sanctity. Thus the angels both here and in other places, as also the martyrs, and all the saints in heaven, where there is nothing of contamination to be found, are said to be clothed in white garments. Matt, xxviii. 3 ; Mark xvi. 5 ; John xx. 12 ; Kev. iii. 4, 5 ; iv. 4, 6, 11 ; vii. 3, 13. "And indeed," saith the most learned Braunius,* " the Hebrews themselves confessed that white was the symbol of cleanness and sanctity, and consequently of justice and integrity. For whoever among the priests was polluted by the law, was bound immediately to put off his white garments, as being unworthy to wear them, and after he had put on black to depart out of the temple. To which that of St. John seems to have relation, where he says. They who have not defiled tlieir garments shall walk in white, because they are worthy, Rev. iii. 4. And for that reason the white colour in the garments of the high priest signified the innocency, justice, and sanctity of Christ. Therefore ' Optat. Milevit. lib. vi. contra Parmen. ' Lib. ii. de Vest. Sac. Heb. cap. 26. n. 34. VER. XI.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 17 white linen is called the righteousness of the saints, Rev. xix. 8. And though the holy garments were mixed with scarlet and purple, yet there was also a mixture of white, and some of the garments were white altogether. So that although Christ were laden with our sins, which were signified by the scarlet' colour, Isa. i. 18, and sprinkled for our sins with blood, which was signified by the purple, yet was he most holy and just. 11. Ye men of Galilee. The disciples of Christ are called Galileans as being natives of Galilee; though all the Christians were generally so called by the Jews and ethnics, as we have observed upon these words of St. Matthew, into the parts of Galilee, Matt. ii. 22. Julian the apostate in an epistle saith, " That the religion of the Galileans increased by their kindness to strangers." Wh;/ stand ye gazing up into heanen ? That is. In vain do ye now expect the return of Christ with your eyes fixed upon heaven. Saith St. Austin,* "The aagels by those words. Why stand ye gazing up into heaven ? what did they mean else but to infer. That it was impossible for human eyes to penetrate into that secret place whither Christ went, when he was carried up to heaven in the sight of his disciples ? " This same Jesus, &c. The particle, this same, is emphatical, and denotes that the angels pointed with their fingers towards the Lord Jesus. " Cease therefore to doubt," saith St. Austin," " that the man Christ Jesus is now there, from whence he shall come ; but diligently get by heart, and faithfully retain the Christian confession, that Christ rose from the dead, ascended into heaven, sits at the right hand of the Father, and that he shall come from thence, and from no other place, to judge the quick and the dead. And so shall he come, according to the testimony of that angelic voice, as he was seen to ascend into heaven ; that is, in the same form and substance of the flesh, to which he gave immortality, but took away nothing of its nature. Yet he is not to be thought to be everywhere diffused, according to that form. For we must be careful that we do not so uphold the divinity of this Man, as to take away the reality of his body. For it Is not consequential, that what is in God should be everywhere as God. For the most true scripture speaks also of us, that we live, move, and have our being in God, yet are we not everywhere as he is; but man is after • Lib. ii.. Quest. Evang. 38, n. 9. ' Ep. 187, alias 57, ad Dardan. n. 10. C 18 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP., I. another manner in God, and God is after another manner in man, after a manner both singular and proper. For God and man is one person, and one Christ Jesus is both. Everywhere as he is God, but only in heaven as he is man." " Again," as Leo well observes,! " The ascension of Christ is our advancement, and whither the glory of the head is gone before, thither also is the hope of the body called." 12. Then. That is to say, when the majesty of Christ was apparently known, the apostles adored him as the King of glory, and Judge of the world, and he being adored, as appears out of Luke xxiv. 52, they return to Jerusalem, rejoicing in their hearts, as now having attained to understand that wonderful mean by which the redemption of mankind was procured, and full of ex- pectation of the descent of the Holy Ghost from heaven upon them, now approaching and at hand. From, the mount called Olivet. That is, from the farther side of Mount Olivet, to which the village of Bethany adjoined, distant from Jerusalem about fifteen furlongs, John ii. 18. Whereas the beginning or foot of the mount was distant not above a sabbath day's journey, or five furlongs, as we find in Josephus.^ Moreover, lest we should extend the length or latitude of Mount Olivet too far, the most famous Ludovicus de Dieu gives us this caution, that St. John may be understood [as speaking] of the Jewish furlongs, whereas Jogephus is to be understood of the Grecian furlongs. " And so," saith he " Bethany, situated in the farther side of this mountain, will be no farther distant from the foot of the mountain than the foot of the same mountain from Jerusalem. For since five Grecian furlongs make seven Jewish furlongs and a half, that number doubled will make fifteen Jewish, or ten Grecian furlongs, which make, exactiy two Jewish miles, or a double sabbath-day « journey. In which sense may be taken that of St. Jerome.* " Bethany, a town two miles from JElia, upon the side of Mount Olivet." Now^ Bethany did not join close to Mount Olivet, but were seated beyond it^ as Adrichomius will have it, or some furlongs distant from it, as it is in the Jewish map set forth by the Jews at Amsterdam, then the words were to be translated : « and they returned by Mount Olivet;" and from the mount seems to denote that the mountain Olivet lay between the fields of Bethany whither Christ carried his disciples, being [about] to » Serm . 1, de Ascens. = Antiq. lib. xx., i;. 6. » be loo. Heb.' VEB. XII.J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 19 ascend into heaven, and the city of Jerusalem, which they were of necessity to pass over before they could come to Jerusalem. "As Bethany," says De Dieu, " is said in the Greek text to have been near to Jerusalem from almost fifteen furlongs, John xi. 18, the from signifies the fifteen furlongs lying between, which are of necessity to be passed over from Bethany to Jerusalem. Thus Rev. xiv. 20: And the bhod came out of the wine-press unto the horse-bridles, from the space of a thousand six hundred furlongs. The vulgar translation rendering the adverb from, per or by, a thousand six hundred furlongs ; and that rightly, for from sig- nifies the adjoining space lying between. Thug, Acts xiv. 24, They coming from Perga, the vulgar version translates, They coming by Perga. Whence it would follow that Christ did not ascend into heaven from Mount Olivet, which nevertheless St. Jerome frequently affirms, and which has always hitherto been believed, as conjectured from Acts i. 12, where however Luke does not aver it, but from the fields of Bethany, which the gospel sufficiently declares, Luke xxiv. 50, 51 ; from which fields of Bethany the apostles went to Mount Olivet, and took the shortest way over that hill to Jerusalem." Which is a sabbath-day's journey. That is, the space between the city and the foot of the hill, was a sabbath-day's journey. See our literal explication upon Matt. xxiv. 20. Says the lately com- mended De Dieu : " The learned easily reconcile this diflference with Josephus, asserting the mountain to be five furlongs distant from the city. For a sabbath-day's journey consisted of two thousand cubits, which extent of ground the Hebrews called a mile, as is manifest out of their writings. But a furlong among the Greeks contained a hundred paces, a pace six foot, or four cubits, as appears from the words of Herodotus,' a hundred just paces are one furlong of six acres, but a pace is the measure of six foot, or four cubits. One foot contains the breadth of four hands, and a cubit six hands breadth. Thus far Herodotus. You see he measures the cubit to be a foot and a half. Therefore six hundred foot, which made a furlong, amount to fbur hundred cubits ; and, consequently, five furlongs two thousand cubits. But how this agrees with the Syrian interpreter, who will have a sabbath-day's journey to be about seven furlongs, the learned do not 80 easily resolve. For our parts we affirm, that the Syrian spake 1 Lib. ii. C 2 20 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. I. not of the Grecian, but the Hebrew furlongs, of which seven and a half make a mile, or sabbath-day's journey. See Baal Aruch upon the word D"il, rus. See the Jewish Map set forth at Amsterdam 5 ■«vhere seven furlongs and a half make a Hebrew short mile ; and four short miles a long one called Parsa. 13. And when they xoere come in. That is, into the city of Jerusalem. Tliei/ went into an upper room. The Greek has it, "into the upper part of the house." But whose house this was • is a thing very much controverted among the learned. Nicephorus, out of one Euodius,' affirms it to have been the house of St. John the Evangelist, the son of Zebedeus. Baronius and Bede assert it to have been the house of that Mary who was the mother of John, surnamed Mark, of whom Luke makes mention in some chapters lower, Theophylact^ believes it to have been the house of Simon the leper. Others will have it to have been the house of Nicodemus, or Joseph of Arimathea. For my part I am apt to believe, that this house was the temple of Jerusalem itself, according to the testimony of Luke himself in his gospel: And they returned to Jerusalem with great joy ; and were continually in the temple, praising andblessing God, ch. xxiv. 52, 53. Observe, that it is there said, " they were there continually," which is here said, they were " remaining together," which being the same in signi- fication, you shall never reconcile the two places if they remained in any other place than the temple. " Neither is this opinion obstructed," saith the famous Lewis de Dieu, " by this, that they are said to have ascended into an upper room, or according to the Syrian interpreter, into a dining room ; for that the temple had several upper rooms built round about the outside of it is apparent from the 1st of Chron. xxviii. II, and 2 Chron. iii. 9. As also chambers and apartments, such as was the chamber of Gemariah, where Baruch read the book of Jeremiah in the liouse of the Lord, Jer. xxxvi. 10. " And Baruch read in the book the words of Jeremiah in the house of the Lord, in the house of Gemariah," according to the Septuagint ; where we are also to observe that the temple is not only called a house, but also that the chamber is also translated a house, both there and ver. 12, 20, 21, as like- wise ch. XXXV. 4, just as the upper chamber where the apostles were, Acts i. 13, is called a house, Acts ii. 2 ; for those chambers ' Lib. i. Hiat. c. 28. a.d. 34, n. 236. " In Matt. xxvi. VER. XIII.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 21 and dining-rooms served not only for the keepers and ministers of the temple, the priests and Levites, and for the preservation of the holy -things, but also for the assembling of devout people to attend to religious exercises. Hence it was that Baruch read the book of Jeremiah in the chamber of Gemariah. In such a chamber it is probable that the devout women met, and were defiled by the sons of Eli, who are said to have had their lodgings at the door of the tabernacle, 1 Sam. ii. 22. Some such place had Anna the pro- phetess to stay in, who departed not from the temple, hut served God with fastings and prayers night and day, Luke ii. 37. Nor is it to be questioned but that the apostles chose to themselves such a place, while they are said to have been continually in ike temple praising and blessing God, Luke xxiv. 53. St. Luke describes the place, that is to say, that it was an upper room where they remained together, and continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, Acts i. 13. And this adds much to the lustre of that illustrious descent of the Holy Ghost upon the apostles, whereof in the following chapter, if we agree it to have fallen out in the temple, where formerly the majestical shadow of God inhabited, but was withdrawn ever since the Babylonish captivity and the loss of the ark ; to the end that laying aside that allegorical type of God's presence, they might aspire to the enjoyment of that real presence which God was shortly to -impart to them, in that very place where his presence was only figuratively represented before ; and as the cloud is said to have filled the house, by Solomon dedicated and consecrated, 1 Kings viii. 10 ; so the wind of the Holy Ghost filled the same house, Acts ii. 2, not that from thence- forward they should remain fixed to that house, but that being driven by the same wind, they might fill the whole world with the gales of evangelic grace; and thus the law went truly out of Sion. Wherefore Erasmus' places this upper room in Mount SIoD. For comparing this place with that where the law was given of old, " in both," saith he, " there is height of place ; but in this there is nothing but a mountain, which the people also are forbid to approach, that is, the dull and earthly, not capable of spiritual things ; here there is a house upon the mountain itself, to let thee understand the concord of the church. There was Mount Sinai proper for the promulgation of the law, which by the multi- tude of its precepts curbs a rebellious people ; for it is called Sinai ' PHraph. ad Act. ii. 22 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. I. from precept. Here is Mount Sion, which in the Hebrew lan- guage signifies a watch-tower, from whence all earthly things are looked on with disdain. Neither does it make against where it is said that the wind filled the house, and not the temple. For it is known that the temple of Solomon was called the first house, and the temple of Zerubbabel the second house. To all this we may add that noted place : And I will fill this house with glory. The glory of the latter house shall be greater than of the former, Hag. ii. 7, 9. Which prophecy was fulfilled upon the feast of Pentecost, when the Holy Spirit, with which the first temple was adorned, but of which the second temple was deprived, according to the confession of the Hebrews, as also of the ark, the Urim and Thummim, the perpetual fire, and the typical presence of the Divine Majesty, filled that temple with the sacred blast, and the apostles with those gifts, which struck all nations into admiration. So that from that time the Holy Spirit alone supplied the absence of the ark, the Urim and Thummim, and the perpetual fire ; and, converting type into verity, granted to us the majesty of God everywhere present with his church." Abode. In the Greek, " were remaining," or " did remain to- gether." Peter, &c. See our explication upon Matt. x. 2, 3. James. Supply, " the son of Alpheus." This Alpheus is thought to be called Cleophas, or Cleopas. For that she who is called Mary the mother of James the lesser, and Joses, is called Mary the wife of Cleopas, or Cleophas, Luke xxiv. 18 ; Mark xv. 40 \ (Tohn xix. 25. And Judas. Supply, "the brother of James," as he calls himself in his own Epistle General. This person, that he might be the more truly distinguished from Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon, is by St. Matthew surnamed Thaddeus ; and from Lebba, a sea town of Galilee, of which Pliny' makes mention, called also Lebbeus, as Lightfoot conjectures in his Hebraic Hours upon Matt. x. 3; John xii. 4. Although in the Hackian edition of Pliny, in the place cited by Lightfoot, the town is not called Lebba, but Jebba. 14. These all continued with one accord in prayer. This St. Luke expresses by other words in his Gospel, ch. xxiv. 53j And they were continually in the temple, praising and blessing God. The words, with one accord, denote, that they did not only agree with hearts ' Lib. V. cap* 1 9. VER. XV. J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 23 and minds among themselves, and cohabit together without strife or contention, but also acted and desired the same thing, chiefly in matters of religion, and more particularly in the duty of prayer. In prayer. According to the Greek, " in prayer and supplica- tion." This St. Luke in his Gospel, ch. xxlv. 53, expresses in these \iovdiS, praising and blessing God. Thus St. Paul makes prayer, blessing, and giving thanks, to be all one, 1 Cor. xiv. 4, &c. Thus supplication seems also to be taken for giving thanks, Phil. i. 4. Nevertheless, sometimes supplication is distinguished from prayer, and then it is taken for deprecation, or prayer to remove or repel some evil. Hence Junius upon this place : " The disciples," saith he, "besought as well the sending of the Holy Ghost, as to be freed from all the present evils with which they were encom- passed." With the women. Meaning those women of whom mention is made. Matt, xxvii, 55, and with them the wives of the apostles. " For," saith the famous Beza, " As it is well observed by others, it was requisite that the wives of the apostles should be confirmed, whom it behoved either to be the companions of their travels, or patiently at home to endure their absen6e." An ancient book of mine adds also, "and with their children." And Mary the mother of Jesus. Mary is exempted from the com- mon sort of women, as the most excellent of women. According to this phrase, David, in the title of the 18th Psalm, is said to be delivered out of the hand of his enemies, and out of the hand of Saul, as being the most potent of his adversaries. And in the Hebrew bibles, reches, a most excellent sort of horses, is particu- larly distinguished from other horses in general : And they brought forth barley and straw for the horses and the reches, I Kings iv. 28.' 15. In those days. That is, when the apostles and the rest of the disciples abode together, expecting the coming of the Holy Ghost. Peter standing up. To whom the priority of degree was given, in regard of his seniority, according to St. Jerome, Cassian, and several others of the fathers. The number of men. Some ancient Latin exemplars, together with the Greek, read names, as it is in the English version. But by names is to be understood men. Thus the name of Christ is taken for Christ himself, ch, iv. 12. The name of God is used for God ' [Authorized version, Barley also and US^'J^T ; translated by Gesenius, a swift straw for the horses and dromedaries, Aorse, one of a peculiar and noble breed.] 24 ' THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. I. himself, Psa. xx. 1, and in other places. Thus in Cicero pro Archia : " Thou demandest of us, why we are so delighted with this name," i. e. this man. TibuUus : " Nor is woman a faithful name." Near a hundred and twenty. So that there were present at this most noble and holy college, besides the eleven apostles and seventy disciples, thirty-seven others, who, together with them, made up the number of a hundred and twenty. 16. The scripture must needs have been fulfilled. That is, according to the interpretation of Christ, from whose lips all the disciples, who were then present, had a little before understood the mystical sense intended by the Holy Ghost from the mouth of David, when he interpreted the scriptures after his resurrection, Luke xxiv. 44,45. Concerning Judas. The rival in wickedness with the impious enemies of David. Who. In the malice of his heart. Was guide to them. Those bloody murderers, of whom, John xviii. 3. 17. Who, &c. In the Greek, "because," instead of the adversa- tive particle, " although." As if he had said. Who, seduced by the devil, soared to that height of impiety, that he most shamefully be- trayed the Lord Christ, although among many other benefits he also attained this, to be enrolled into our number and apostolic college. Lot. That is, ministry or function. That lot is taken for office or employment, is apparent out of Livy and the lexicon writers; kleros in Greek, and sors in Latin. Lot is said in the first place to be any thing cast into a little vessel, and then drawn forth again. In the next place, the same words are taken for that portion or property which is gained by the lot cast. Lastly, they are taken in a diffusive sense for that proportion of anything which falls to any man by the allotment or appointment of any one, or by any other accident, " and it is said not only of hereditary goods, whether they be obtained by gift, or labour, but also of offices or functions, aa here," says Brenius. Ver. 26 ; Prov. xvi. 33 ; Deut. iii. 6. Moreover, the word kleros is by long use made proper to those who are in the ecclesiastical ministry. However, in scripture the pastors of the church are never, the flocks but once charactered under this title, 1 Pet. v. 3, where Peter the apostle, joining him- self to the presbyters as a fellow presbyter, admonishes them not to domineer over the lots. " By lots," saith the forementioned VER. XVIIl.J LITEEALLY EXPLAINED. 25 Daniel BreniuSj upon this place of St. Peter, « he understands the assemblies of the faithful con^egated out of the Jews and Gen- tiles, to whom, through Christ, their lot is fallen among the people of God, who being his peculiar, and not the property of the bishops, they are therefore to act not according to their will and pleasure, but according as they are prescribed. Allusion being made to the allotments of the tribes, who had their divisions in the land of Canaan by lots ; but chiefly for this reason, that Israel is said to be the portion and inheritance of God." Of this ministry. In the Greek, "of this deaconry." Deaconry signifies the exercise of any office or function ; but below, ver. 25, where the word " apostleship" is added, there it is restrained only to the apostolic function. 18. And this man possessed a field. Not as his own possession, but as an eternal monument of infamy. For still the people cried, as they passed by, This is the field bought with the thirty pieces of silver, which Judas took as the price and hire of his detestable treason. And it may probably be conjectured, that Judas himself was buried in that field appointed for the interment of strangers ; for so the sense of the words. And this man possessed a field with the hire of iniquity, will be the same as if we should say: And this man out of his covetousness of shameful gain delivered the Author of salvation into the hands of the Jews, and, suddenly snatched away by a severe death, got nothing by such a detestable and inhu- man crime, but a small pittance of earth for the burial of his body in that field, which the priests jointly bought with the restored hire which they had given to Judas. For Luke, as Heinsius notes, ■ did not say, " he possessed the little field," in reference to the whole field, but " a little field," that is, he possessed a little part of the field. For when he comes to speak of the whole field, or the field itself, he does not only say, « the little field," but " that little field." " What then," says Heinsius, " means that word, a little field ? A part of the earth, or place sufficient to contain the body of the dead." And being hanged. In the Greek, " and being headlong :" " For the Greek word," saith Leigh, in his Sacred Critics, " does not properly signify hanged, but prone, headlong, and with head down- ward, and signifies the posture of a person suffocated with a halter, with the face hanging toward the earth, as Erasmus observes." Others render the Greek, " and being cast down headlong," or as 26 THE ACTS' OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. I. the common English translation hath, " and falling headlong." But that this version may be reconciled with that of Matthew, saying. And departing, he went and hanged himself, ch. xxxvii. 5, as the ancient Latin interpreter renders the Greek words, some turn it thus, " And departing, he was consumed with anguish of mind." For the Greek word used there, if we may credit Heinsius, Grotius, and Brenius, " is to be tormented with grief and sadness, and stop- page of the breath, whether the person die of those torments or no." So that Matthew does not speak of the death of Judas, which happened after the same manner here by St. Luke related, but of the unsupportable torment of an exulcerated conscience; which Chrysostom calls,^ " to be strangled with conscience," that is, to be oppressed with the guilt of his crimes. Lightfoot- renders the Greek word in St. Matthew, " he was strangled." And so he believes the death of Judas happened. " For now," says he, " after he had thrown back the price of his treason, when Judas was de- parted with an intention to return to his own family, the devil, who dwelt in him, snatching him up into the air, strangled him, and threw him down headlong, so that dashing against the earth, he burst in two in the middle, his guts tumbling forth, after which horrible exit the devil left him." But whereas the most ancient author of the Epistle to the Philippians under the name of Ignatius the martyr, ascertains hanging to be the death of Judas; and Juvencus affirms that he hanged himself upon a fig-tree;' and Bede testifies that the same was to be seen in his time near Jerusa- lem : the Vulgar Latin version of St. Matthew seems to be preferred before the rest, which, though it seems to vary something from the relation of Peter concerning his casting down headlong, yet does it carry no contradiction to it. Matthew gives an account of the beginning of the action, Peter of the end, -supplying by divine inspiration what was wanting in the relation of Matthew. Judas fits the halter to his neck, and springs downward with the greater violence, to the end he might the sooner choke himself. But that the vengeance of God might more eminently appear in the horrid and immature death of the infamous traitor, by an unexpected accident the rope broke, so that Judas fell headlong upon some craggy stone, or sharp pointed stump of a tree, so that his bursten belly let forth all his bowels. Thus Casaubon. Concerning the ten thousand Idumeans thrown headlong by the Jews from a rock, ' Horn. 22, ad Antiochen. ' De locis Sanctis. VER. XX.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 27 who all of them burst their bowels, the story still is extant, 2 Chron. xxv. 12. Papias, who, as Eusebius declares, was a writer of little worth, and one that feigned trifles from false interpreta- tion, confounding the Greek word signifying "headlong," with another Greek word signifying " swollen up," and thence erecting his own dreams, relates that the body of Judas was swelled to that immensity, that so much ground as was sufficient to drive a cart through could not contain it; and that thereupon the cart went over him and squeezed out his bowels. In like manner the authors of another fable, when they read that Judas possessed or purchased a field with the hire of iniquity, affirmed that the same field, in regard that Judas died in it, by reason of the horrid stench which he left behind, remained barren and untilled. 19. And it was known to all the dwellers at Jerusalem. That is to say, that horrid sort of death, which ended ,the ignominious life of the sacrilegious betrayer of Christ. Insomuch that field is called. That is to say, that field which was purchased with the hire of treachery, and infamous for the burial and perhaps the death of the traitor. For many are persuaded that Judas deservedly perished in that field ; and that by this event the priests were the rather instigated to desire the purchase of that field. In their proper tongue. The Greek has it, " in their proper dia- lect," that is to say, which was used by the inhabitants of Jerusa- lem. This Peter speaks as a Galilean, and speaking to the disciples of Christ, who were for the most part Galileans. Now the Gali- leans had a distinct dialect from those of Jerusalem : as appears from the history of Christ's passion, where Peter's tongue betrayed him. Hakeldama, The field of Mood. Saith the most learned Lightfoot, as well because it was purchased with the price of blood, as watered with the blood of the traitor. 20. For it is written. Now Peter alleges the Scripture, which before, ver. 16, he had said was to be fulfilled; that is to say, according to the mystical sense intended by the Holy Ghost : as the disciples had learned it from the lips of Christ, explaining the scripture, Luke xxiv. 44. In the book of Psalms. That work which the Hebrews are wont to call the book of Hymns, because the chief part of it celebrates the praises of- God, the Greeks and Latins call the Psalter, from the 28 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. I. name of the instrument to which those hymns were sung. They are in all a hundred and fifty in the Hebrew copies. For the hun- dred and fifty-first, which is added in the Greek, is fictitious, rejected not only by the Hebrews, but by the council of Laodicea. Theodoret and many others, as well ancient as modern, affirm David to be the only author of all the Psalms. Philastrius' also accounts them to be heretics who think otherwise. But St. Austin- waversj sometimes ascribing the whole work to David alone, sometimes allowing him to have composed no more than only nine ; affirming the rest to have been made by the four singers, of whom he made choice for that purpose. But it is apparent from the arguments of the Psalms, wherein their authors are discovered, or from the ex- press words and subjects of the Psalms, by which the time of their composure may be conjectured, that all the Psalms were not the work of David only, but of several authors. Deservedly there- fore Hilarius,'' in his preface to the Psalms, concludes the whole composure to be called, not the Psalms of David, but the Book of Psalms ; as here it is called by Peter, and by Christ himself, Luke XX. 42. The author of the Synopsis attributed to Athanasius and Hilarius says, that the Psalms were reduced into one volume by Esdras, and digested into that order as now they are extant.* "As for that division of the Psalms into five parts, which Hilarius and Jerome affirm to have been used by the Hebrews, and is at this day observed in their book,^ I believe to be no ancienter than the times of the Maccabees," saith a person among the eloquent, most highly learned, and among the learned surpassingly eloquent, Peter Daniel Huetius.^ Let his habitation. What David, out of his zeal to justice and the honour of God, imprecating upon his enemies, had prophesied, that the Holy Ghost also, speaking by the mouth of David, would have foretold concerning the persecutors of Christ, typified by David. And thus Peter being taught the sense .of the holy scriptures by Christ, deservedly applies to Judas, the leader of the persecutors of Christ, the miserable destruction foretold of his persecutors in general. Psal. Ixix. 25. And, his bishopric let another take. To the end that another testimony of scripture may be the better understood to be cited, ' Hter. 126. * Prol. in Psal. Epiat. ad Sophron. et ' Lib. xvii. de Civ. Dei. cap. 14. Cyp. ' In Dissertatione ad Tit. Primi Psalmi. ' Demonst. Evang. Prop. 4. VEit. XXII.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 29 in imitation of Beza, I put a comma after the copulative, and, so that the sense is the same as if Peter had said, The same Spirit which, Psal. Ixix. 25, had foretold the death of Judas, and thereby the vacancy of his function, foretold also that another was to be substituted in his place, upon whom the honour of the bishopric, of which Judas was deprived, should be conferred. "Where," saith Beza, " he calls the bishopric a ministry or function, as much as to say inspection. The Hebrews, for the same reason, called it an oversight. Num. iii. 32, which word we have retained willingly, for that St. Peter here discourses concerning an ecclesiastical, and that particularly an apostolical function; whereas, David wrote this properly against Doeg, the overseer of the king's herds. However, the appellations of pastors of sheep and of the flqck, are frequently attributed to ecclesiastical administration." In the charter of Ina, king of the "West Saxons, set forth by Spelman, among the Councils, an. 725, one Daniel subscribing, calls himself, «' Overseer of the flock of God." 21. Therefore must one, &c. As if he had said. Seeing God is pleased to make use of our diligence to choose another into the place of Judas deceased, and that we are assured of the pleasure of God, it is not lawful for us to delay, but strenuously to execute whatever the duty of our ministry requires. Wetit in and out among us. That is, performed the oflSce of preach- ing enjoined him by the Father. To go in and go out, denotes in scripture the laborious discharge of a duty, when it is spoken of those who are entrusted with any eminent charge. Num. xxvii. 17, 21 ; Deut. xxxi. 2 ; 1 Sam. xviii. 13, 16 ; xxix. 6; 2 Sam. iii. 25 ; 2 Kings i. 3, 7 — 9 ; 1 Chron. xxvii 1 ; 2 Chron. i. 10. 22. Beginning from the baptism of John. That is, according to the interpretation of Grotius, " from the time that Christ was baptized by John ; for that was the beginning of his taking his function upon him." He was taken up from us. That is, when ascending into heaven he was withdrawn in a cloud from our sight. To he ordained vrith us a witness of his resurrection. That is to say, in an apostolic degree and order. Here is required by Peter an eye-witness, such as John the Baptist bespeaks himself to have been, where he says. And I also have seen and have given tes- timony/, John i. 34. For this did not meanly avail toward the strengthening of belief. In the meanwhile, Peter strictly binds 30 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. II. himself and his companions to the necessity of preaching the gospel, while he ordains new proolaimers of the resurrection of Christ, which is preferred before all other doctrines of the gospel, as being the chief Head and Foundation of it, as St. Paul teaches, 1 Cor. XV. 17. 23. And they appointed two. That is to say, the disciples not daring to do more than what they knew to be their office and duty, and commanded them by the Lord, publicly, and by the suffrages of the whole college, put up two of the most eminent persons among them, that God might choose to himself which he thought fittest for the exercise of the apostolic function, and to the end the party so chosen might boast with Paul, that he was not made an apostle neither by men, nor of men, Gal. i. 1. Joseph, who was called Barsabas. This person some will have to be the same with him who is called Joses, and by the apostles surnamed Barnabas, ch, iv. 36. " And certainly," saith Glasslus, " there is but little difference in the declension and pronunciation of these names, which is a small alteration of a letter in each name." Who was surnamed the Just. That is, if we may believe Drusius, by the Jews following the Greek idiom, who write, 'lovoroe* Otherwise, in the Hebrew language, tsaddik signifies "just," which was the surname of Simon the high priest, who attended upon Alexander, whom others called Jadduas. The author also of the Talmudic Lexicon, Rabbi Nathan, is surnamed Tsaddik, or the Just. And Matthias. Clemens Alexandrinus * believes this person to have been Zaccheus, of whom Luke, ch. xix. of his gospel. The name of Matthias is the same, however, with that other name which is written more at large, Mattathias, as Drusius observes. 24. And they prayed. Induced thereto by the promise of Christ, What things soever ye desire when ye pray, believe that ye shall receive them, and ye shall have them, Matt. xi. 24. And said. That is, they prayed about this manner. Neither does Luke set down their words, contenting himself only to recite the sum of their prayer. Thou, Lord. As much as to say : Whereas it belongs only to thee, O Lord, rightly to judge of the hearts and minds of men, and for what ministry or function every one is most fit : be pleased ' Strom. 4. VER. XXV. j LITEKALL-Y EXPLAINED. 31 to declare which of these two, conspicuous for their uncorrupted conversation and integrity of life, thou art pleased to substitute .into the place of Judas, since, which is most worthy to be preferred cannot be discerned by human judgment. 25. To take a place. The now extant printed Greek copies have, " to take a lot," that is, to be made partaker. Of this ministry and apostieship. That is, of this apostolic function. From which Judas by transgression fell The Greek has it, "from which Judas declined, or turned aside." « But," saith Beza, " the genuine interpretation of these words is to be collected from the following coherences. For the vocation of every man is as it were the way and road where every one is to journey, if he intend to attain to the end of his stage. From this way, therefore, that is, from the apostieship, Judas is said to have deviated, or turned aside, or rather, leaving it altogether, to have taken a quite contrary path. Epiphanius reads the article from which in the masculine gender, referring it to the masculine Greek word signifying ' lot,' though without any alteration of the sense." That he might go to his own place. That is, that he might go whither his deserts called him, to shame and perdition, in search of death and an ignominious halter, as the remedy of his despair through the guilt of his conscience. The most learned KnatchbuU would have the Greek words translated, "That he may enter upon his place." As if the sense were, that the person whom thou shalt choose may succeed into the place of him that has deserted it, that is, into the apostieship of Judas, and that "his own" may be taken for " his," the same worthy author proves out of Ecumenius ; as Budaeus affirms the pronoun suum to be frequently used instead of ^us by Cicero, in imitation of the Greeks, So that, " to go to his place" is the same thing as in the English law phrase, to enter upon, or to take upon one the inheritance. " And this interpreta- tion," adds the same author, "seems to me more agreeable to reason than that of those who understand the words as spokeU of Judas; as if Luke would say, that Judas went into his place, that is, into hell. Nor can I believe that ever any such thing entered into the thoughts of the evangelist. But I admire with Chrysostom the prudence of the evangelist; who does not reproach nor insult over any person. Which argues that Chrysostom did not believe that St. Luke had adjudged Judas to hell. For what 32 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLKS [CHAP. II. more reproachful could Luke have said, than that he was gone to his place, if he meant hell ? Neither was it for an historian or an evangelist to give his own judgment so severe, but to have left Judas to the condemnation of God. It was enough for him to relate matter of fact, as he promised in the beginning of his gospel; as they delivered them, to us, who from theleginning were eye- witnesses. But who was an eye-witness of Judas's being in hell ?" Thus far, the most accomplished with all manner of learning, Sir Norton KnatchbuU, knight and baronet. 26. And they gave forth their lots. That is, according to the interpretation of Grotius, " they put their names together into an urn, and into another urn a small roll of paper having the word apostle wrote within, it, together with another blank ; then out of both urns they equally drew two rolls, as in the division of the land. Of this way of casting lots in the choice of a king, whose election God would have to depend upon himself, there is a notable example to be found, 1 Sam. x. 20. Likewise for the discovery of Achan, Josh. vii. 13, &c. See our annotations upon the 11th verse of the prophet Obadiah. And the lot fell upon Matthias. That is, divine providence so disposing the lots, the name of Matthias with the word apostle, came forth. See our literal explanation upon Jonah i. 7. He was numhered. The Greek word implies, that this event of the lot was approved by the common consent of all the rest ; as they who from thence were certainly assured, that it was the will of God that Matthias should succeed in Judas's room, and from thenceforth was to be called not by the common name of disciple,, but to be dignified with the noble title of apostle. CHAPTER IL 1. And when the day of Pentecost was fully come. According to the Greek, in " the fulfilling the day," that is, the time of the Quinquagesima. The space of fifty days from the paschal day to the festival day itself, which the Christians vulgarly called Pente- cost, is by the Greek and Latin writers generally called Pentecost, or the time of Pentecost. By Ferrand the deacon, as also by VER. II.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 33 Cassian it is called Quinquagesima ; ' by Rabanus, and = Honorius of Augustodunum, Quinquagesima Paschalis, to distinguish it from the other Quinquagesima, which is before the Quadragesima, Lent. The sense, therefore, of Luke is the same as if he had said. When the day came, or presently after it wa^. past, wherein the paschal Quinquagesima was completed. For the words of Luke admit either of the two interpretations, as we have observed in our annotations upon Matt. xxi. 1. They were all. That is, those hundred and twenty, of which that most noble and most holy college of disciples of Christ at that time consisted ; as is said before, ch. i. 15. With one accord. The Greek word is rendered by Beza " with one accord," as in the English; but by the Latin Yulgate inter- preter here, "together:" above, ch. i. 14, "unanimously." Never- theless, we must confess, that the self-same word is often made use of by the Greek interpreters of the scripture to express the simple meaning of the word together, even where there cannot be any agreement of mind- In the same place. That is, in the same dining-room or upper chamber, into which the disciples ascended upon their return from Mount Olivet to Jerusalem. See what we have said upon the same place, ch. i. 13. 2. And there came. That is, upon the first day of the week, the fiftieth from the resurrection of Christ, and the tenth from his ascent into heaven, which that year, according to Usher's Chro- nology, fell upon the 24th of May. This day by the Christians is called, from the Greek word, Pentecost; but by the first Council of Orleans, and by the second of Tours, Quinquagesima.^ Suddenly, The ears are the more surprised with a sudden and unexpected noise. A sound from heaven. In Greek, " a sound reverberated, or resounding." As if he had said, The sky by the divine power resounded with a sudden noise, as if a violent wind had suddenly begun to blow with unusual violence. But as the four evangelists neither of them say that a dove descended upon Christ at his baptism ; so it is not here said, that there was heard the sound of a vehement wind, but "as it were of a vehement wind." In the ' Cap. 214, lib. ii. de Ccenob. Instit. cap. J 8. • Lib. i. de Inetitiit. Cler. cap. 41, 43, lib. iii. gem. Anim.cap. 148. » Can. 29. Can. 17. 34 THE ACTS OF THE HOLy APOSTLES [CHAP. II. same manner, in the following verse, the tongues that were seen were said to be seen as it were like fire ; to the end that we may understand that all these things were only visional, which St. Chrysostom observes,' and as we from him have noted upon Matt. iii. 16. And filled, &c. See what we have already said upon ch. i. 5, 13, Where they were sitting. That is, where they remained together ; or where, in a quiet and sedate posture, by the command of Christ they expected from him the gift of the Holy Ghost, promised by the Father to all believers, Luke xxiv. 49, and Acts i. 24. 3. And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire. The tongue is Mkened to fire and flame, by reason of its resem- blance to the shape: for the aspiring flame of fire is like the tongue put out of the mouth ; and next, because of its resemblance in action : for that as the creatures take hold of and lick in their food with the tongue, so the fire casting forth its flame is said to devour the combustible matter, Isa. v. 24. And it sat, &c. That is, and this fire resembling cloven tongues, visibly rested upon every one of the hundred and twenty, who with conjoined hearts and unanimous wishes expected the Holy Ghost, which was to be sent by Christ. 4. Jnd they were all filled. The women also who were then present in the same place, as appears v. 17 and 18. " With the Holy Ghost. That is, with the most excellent gifts of the Holy Ghost, who being promised by Christ made it undoubted to the hearing by the noise of the wind, and visible to the sight by means of the fire resembling the cloven tongues, that he was now come. " Those visible gifts," saith Beza,'' " which in the beginning of the growing church so vigorously flourished, as Joel had foretold, are metonymically understood under the denomination of the Holy Ghost, as being his peculiar effects, according to the doctrine of St. Paul," 1 Cor. xii., &c. ; Acts xix. 2, &c. And they began to speak in various tongues. The Greek has it, " in other tongues," according to the English version. That is, in other tongues than they knew before, according to the promise of Christ, Mark xvi. 17 : They shall speak with new tongues. As the Spirit gave them utterance. That is, the Holy Ghost governing and directing their tongues, to the end they might speak persuasively and awfully the great .things performed in ' Ser. i. de Pentecoste. " Upon John vii. 30. VER. v.] LITEliALLY EXPLAINED. 35 Christ and through Christ, either in this or that, in more or fewer languages. But it appears out of 1 Cor. xii, 10, 28, 30, xiv. 2, 4, 5, &c., that they are under a mistake who assert that there was any miracle wrought in the ears of the auditory, as if that though the disciples of Christ spake only one sort of language, yet that their speech was understood by all, as if they had spoken distinctly in their several idioms. Utterance. The Greek word is interpreted by Tarnovius,' " so to utter a speech that there should be a great efficacy in every word, and much wisdom contained in every period." Paul opposes the same word to those v/ho after the manner of fanatics talk much, but vainly, and to little purpose. Acts xxvi. 25. Beza says also, " That ' they are properly said to utter a speech according to the signification of the Greek word, who speak things sententious and enlivening, such as were those which St. Luke soon after calls the wonderful works of God. As also such as spake not their own thoughts, but by the impulse of Divine inspiration; as it is written of the prophets, 2 Pet. i. 2 1 ; which was that which Luke altogether purposed to express here by this Greek word, and the Latins use to declare by fori a more significant word than loqui, though this distinction is not always observed." 5. But there were dwelling in Jerusalem. According to the Greek, "inhabiting." That is to say, as the learned Mede ex- pounds it, "sojourning together;" including those who resorted together from other countries to celebrate the feasts of the Paschal Lamb and Pentecost; for which purpose they took up their lodgings in the city, as is apparent by what follows. It is' true that the Greek words denote a fixed and durable habitation. But among the Hellenists, whose dialect the writers of the New Testament imitate, they ^re indifferently made use of for a longer or shorter abiding in one place ; that is, as well for sojourning as for inhabiting : as the two following examples plainly prove from the translation of the Septuagint. The first is Gen. xxvii. 44, where the Greek word oikein, and the Latin word habitare in the Vulgate version, signify to " tarry a few days." The latter example is in 1 Bangs xvii. 20, where Elias speaking of the widow where he was wont to lodge, uses the word katoikein, for sojourning, " with whom I sojourn ;" both the f(5rementioned Greek words ' In Meilul. Evang. 36 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY AJOSTLES [CHAP. II. answering to the Hebrew jashab, which signifies any sort of abiding or tarrying in any place. Jews. That is to say, by religion and birth descended from the seed of Abraham, as appears from ver. 22, 23, 39. For certain it is that Cornelius the centurion was the first of the Gentiles that was converted to the Christian faith. Devout men. So were they called, who not at all deterred by distance of place, or diflSculty of travelling, came to Jerusalem to worship God in the temple, according to the command of the law. Out of every nation under heaven. That is, out of all nations where the Jews lived up and down dispersed. "For there is no nation in the universal orb where some of our people do not inhabit," says Agrippa the younger, king of the Jews in Josephus., The scattering and captivity of the Jews, was threefold before the destruction of Jerusalem and the burning of the temple by Titus. The first was of the ten tribes under Shalmaneser, which, saith Jerome upon Joel, ch. iii. 6, even at this day inhabit in the cities and mountains of the Medes. Of these were the Jews, in the following verse 9 called Parthians, Medes, and Elamites. The second scattering was of the tribes of Judah and Benjainin under Nebuchadnezzar, a great part of which did not return to Jeru- salem, when it was restored together with the temple by Zerub- babel. From these descended those Jews who are said to have inhabited Mesopotamia, ver. 9. The third dissipation of the Jews was under Ptolemy Lagus, who having destroyed Jerusalem carried away a vast number of Jews into Egypt, who were called Hellenists. The Jews by this threefold captivity dispersed and scattered among the Assyrians, Babylonians, and Egyptians, fled of their own accords to other places and kingdoms ; so that where- soever the apostles travelled to preach the gospel, they found in every city of the Gentiles a synagogue of the^ Jews. Arid St. James directs his general Epistle to those of the twelve tribes, who were dissipated and dispersed through almost all the regions of the world. 6. But now report being made of this. That is, the fame of this miracle being spread abroad. The Greek word phone, "voice," is not only here but also elsewhere used for fame. Num. xvi, 34- 1 Kings i. 40, &c. ' ' De Bell. JuH. lib. ii. c. IG. VER. IX.] LITEK4LLY EXPLAINED. 37 The multitude gathered together. That the diversity of languages might appear, by comparing them one with another. And were confounded, &c. As if he had said. The foreigners stood astonished when they heard the ignorant and illiterate Gali- leans, that had never travelled out of their country to learn foreign languages, dispute with so much gravity and profoundness con- cerning such divine mysteries in their own several native dialects and tongues. 7. And they were all amazed. Here the principal effect of the miracle is expressed, for that, being astonished at the novelty and the wonder together, they began to inquire the more into it. " And indeed," saith Calvin, " so it behoves us ever with astonish- ment to admire the works of God, that from thence may proceed both consideration and a desire of understanding." 8. Our language. That is, speaking in the language and dialect proper to ourselves. 9. Parthians. That is, the Jews who dwelt under the dominion of the Parthians. That many of the Jews lived under the empire of the Parthians is apparent out of Josephus, and the above-cited oration of Agrippa the younger, set down by the same Josephus.' The Parthians, or ParthyaBans, whose country is called Parthyaja, and Parthyene, were a people, who, in a search of new seats, fled out of Scythia into Media. " For," saith Trogus,' " exiles in the Scythian language are called Parthi." Nevertheless, it is more proper to think that the Scythians themselves, and not their fugitives, laid the foundations, of the Parthian people, as Quintus Curtius reports.' This Parthia is bounded to the west by Media, to the north by Hyrcania, to the east by Aria, and to the south by Caramania the desert, as the cosmographer writes.* The metropolis of Parthia was called Hecatompylos, and is thought to have stood in the same place where now stands Ispahan, the seat of the Persian kings. Their kings were surnamed Arsace from Arsaces, either a Scythian or a Bactrian, who was the first that took upon him the dominion of the Parthians, as the geographer asserts. They wintered at Ctesiphon, but spent the summer in Hyrcania, and ,at Ecbatana, according to Strabo, whom the learned call, by wsly.of excellency, the geographer. The same author testifies that the Parthians in his time possessed so large and spacious a territory, ' Prologue to his Book of the Wars of the Jews, lib. ii., De Bello Jud. cap. 16, Gr. 28. 2 Lib. xli. cap. 1. ' Lib, vi. cap. 2. ' Lib. vi. cap. 15. 38 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. II. and ruled over so many nations, that by reason of the vastness of their empire, they were almost equal in power to the Romans.' The first among the Eomans that triumphed over them, was Ven- tidius Bassus, according to Gellius.^ Extraordinary was their manner of fight, therefore famous among the poets, for they fought flying. See Virg. Geor. iii. v. 30; Ovid, de Ar. Am. v. 211. Parthos, or Parthus, is also the name of an Illyrian city, whose inhabitants are called Partheni. But Parthus was a province of Macedonia, whose inhabitants, according to Ptolemy, called by the critics the cosmographer, are famed by the name of Parthyaei ; and according to Pliny, by the name of Parthini, whose single city Eriboea is celebrated by Ptolemy.' Medes. That is, the Jews who inhabited in Media. See what has been already said, ver. 5. Media and the Medes were so called from Madai the third son of Japhet, Gen. x. 2.* However, Herodotus asserts, ^ that they were first called Arians before they were called Medes. Media is bounded to the east by Hyrcania and Parthia, and separated from it by the Caspian mountain. To the west lies the greater Armenia and Assyria ; to the south lies Persia ; and to the north the Caspian sea. This Media is, for the most part, mountainous and cold and altogether barren, unless that part of the country which adjoins to the Caspian Straits, which is fruitful of all things necessary for human support, except oil, and therefore called happy and most fertile by the geographer, and by Virgil the most opulent.^ Formerly the Medes were subject to the Assyrians, till Arbaces, viceroy of Media, revolted from Sardanapalus ; and having destroyed Nineveh, erected the monarchy of the Medes, which afterwards lasted under nine kings two hundred and fifty-nine years, and was then translated from Astyages, the last king of the, Medes, to the Persians, by Cyrus his grandchild by the daughter's side. Thomas de Pinedo ob- serves, that the Parthians, Medes, and Persians, are oftentimes indifierently taken one for another by ancient writers. Elamites. The Syrian interpreter calls them Elanseans, or Elanites, not the inhabitants of Elane near Eziongaber upon the Red sea, which belongs to Arabia the stony, but of another province of the same name, which Benjamin Tudelensis, in his ■ Lib. XV.; lib. xvi. cap. ] ; lib. ii. ' Noct. Attic, lib. xv. cap. 4. ■ Lib. iii. cap. 13; lib. iii. cap. 23. <■ Joseph. Ant. i. 5. ' Lib. vii. cap. 62. o j^;,,^ xi.— Georg. ii. 136. VER. IX.J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 39 Itinerary printed at Leyden, ' places between Persia, Chorasan, Mesopotamia, and Armenia. From Elam the son of Shem, Gen. X. 22, Elimse takes its name, a province of the Assyrians joining to Persia, near Susiana, the chief city of which was Elymais, wherein stood the temple of Diana, opulent in silver and gold, and rich presents, many of which were given by Alexander the the Macedonian king, 1 Mac. vi. This city Antiochus Epiphanes would have sacked for the riches of the temple; for which reason he was struck from heaven with sudden death, says Polybius the Megalopolite, mentioned by Josephus.' Though Josephus relates, that it was more probable that that accident befell him because he would have plundered the temple of Jerusalem. In like manner Menander, an ancient historian, cited by Josephus,'' at- tributes the cause of those rains, which sacred history relates to have fallen upon the pray ers of Elijah the prophet, 1 Kings xviii. 45, to the supplications of Ithobalus king of the Tyrians. The same Antiochus endeavoured to take Persepolis, and to rob its temples ; for gold and silver are nowhere safe, 2 Mac. ix. Whether Persepolis and Elymais be the same, I know not. The inha- bitants of the province of Elymae, called by Luke Elamites, by the Syrian interpreter Elanseans, or Elanites, by Strabo and other Elymaeans, and described to be fierce and warlike bow-men by Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel, lived upon the spoil, and were the only neighouring people that durst make head 'against the Par- thians, and are said by Strabo, lib. xi., to have exacted tribute from the kings of Persia. These Elymaeans were always subject to their own proper kings, of whom Jeremiah and Strabo make mention. Two of these are upon record, Chedorlaomer is one, the other is Arioch, Gen. xiv. 1 ; Judith i. 6. However, though Strabo rightly distinguisheth the Elymaeans from the Susians, whom Eustathius and Eusebius derive from Shelach, or Sela, the son of Arphaxad, and from the Persians, whom Bochart and Heidegger deduce from Sabtha, the son of Gush; yet Elam is often taken not only strictly for Elymais, but also for all the neighbouring nations lying upon the river Eulaeus, as the Gabians, Carbians, Massabitics, whose provinces the geographer attributes to the Elymaans and the Susians ; for Benjamin Tudelensis in his, Itinerary takes Chuzistan, or the province of Susia, to be the same with Elam. The Arabian interpreter, newly printed at Paris, 1 P. 73. ' Antifj. lib. xii. cap. 13. ' Antiq. viii. 7. 40 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. II. tenders Elam, Gen, x. 22j by Churestan, which is the same with Chuzistan. Hence Daniel, ch. viii. 2, places Shushan the metro- polis of Susia, in the province of Elam; and Ptolemy, Pliny, and Marcian, seat the Elymteans not far from the mouth of the river Eula3us. And from hence lastly it is that Josephus makes > the Elymaeans to have been the first ancestors of the Persians ; that is to say, that till the reign of Cyrus the Persians were called by the name of the neighbouring people, Elymaeans. But after Cyrus's time, though they often occur under that name, especially in sacred history, yet commonly Persia is not called by the name of Elam, but of Paras, which signifies a horse, because the Persians were of footmen made to fight on horseback by the appointment of Cyrus, as Xenophon relates. And who dwell in Mesopotamia. Luke proceeds in a direct order from east to west, in the recital of these people. But in regard the inhabitants of Mesopotamia, Judea, Cappadocia, Pontus, and Asia, are comprehended in the former words, ver. 5, that dwell' in Jerusalem, plain it is, that by inhabitants or dwellers is not meant they who had settled abodes, but they who sojourned for some time in Jerusalem. See the former Annot. upon ver. • 5. By Stephen of Byzantium the inhabitants of Mesopotamia are called Mesopotamites ; by Vopiscus, in the Life of Aurelius, Mesopo- tamians. See our notes upon Hosea xii. 12. Judea. Strictly so taken, from whose dialect that of the Galileans was much different, as appears by Peter's being be- trayed by his tongue. See our literal explication upon Matt, iii. 5. Cappadocia. This to the west is bounded by Galatia, to the south by Cilicia, to the east by Armenia, to the north by part of the Euxine sea, according to Ptolemy.* The Cappadocians, in- habitants of this country, were formerly called Leucosyrians, as Plipy testifies, lib. vi. cap. 3, and Syrians, as Herodotus witnesses.' Before the enlargement of the Koman empire, they were first under the Persians, and afterwards governed by themselves in the reign of Ariaratha, after whom reigned Archelaus, whose daughter Glaphyra married to Alexander the son of Herod the Great, by the relation of Constsntine Porphyrogenitus.* The geographer relates this story somewhat otherwise.' That when the royal line failed;, ' 1 Antiq. 6. » Lib. V, cap. 6. ' Lib.' i. cap. 72. * Lib. i. Them. 2. b Lib. xii. p. 640. VEE. IX.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 41 the Romans, in regard of the common league of friendship be- tween both nations, permitted them to live under their own laws« but that the Cappadocians, sending their ambassadors, refused their liberty, and desired to hare a king imposed upon them. The Romans, therefore, admiring the humour of the people, that [they] were out of love with liberty, sent them a free permission to choose a king among themselves, who thereupon chose Ario- barzanes, whom Porphyrogenitus calls Ariaratha ; whose line failing also after the third descent, Archelaus was imposed upon them by Antonius, no way related to Ariobarzanes. Formerly the nation of the Cappadocians was infamous for wickedness and fraudulency, as also the Cilicians and Cretes, which gave rise to the proverb, " Three Kappas or K's the worst," which was after- wards applied to the three Corneliuses, Sylla, Cinna, and Lentulus, whose proper names were Cornelius. Nevertheless, there is no country so bad, which does not produce some excellent persons. Thus Cappadocia gave to the world three most renowned bishops, Gregory, surnamed the wonder-worker, of NeocaBsarea ; Basil the Great of Caesarea; and Gregory Nazianzen. Formerly it pro- duced Pausanias, who from the place of his nativity is . called Cassariensis, from his country Cappadocian and Syrian, in regard that some comprehend Cappadocia under Syria. The often-praised geographer Strabo was also born in a town of Cappadocia, called Amasia. Ponhis. The country of Asia the less, famous for the renowned Mithridates, and Aquila, that exquisite interpreter of the Old Testament. This region is bounded to the west by the river Halys, to the east by the country of Colchis, to the south by the leaser Armenia, and to the north by the Euxine sea, according to Strabo. Ptolemy, varying^in his limits : " Pontus," saith he,' " is bounded to the west by the mouth of the Propontis and the Thracian Bosphorus, to the south by that country which is pro- perly called Asia, and to the north by part of the Euxine Sea." Asia. Meaning the Proconsular Asia, which was under the prqconsul, and chief of the seven provinces which constituted the Asian diocese. '' " The Romans," saith Frederick Spanheim the son, "called that particularly Asia which comprehended the country belonging to the Pergamen kings, which lies between the Hellespont, Lydia, and Caria, and comprehends a part of Mysia, • Lib. V. ' Strab, lib, xiii. 42 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. II. with the country named ^olis, extending itself on the one side to the Adramitic Gulf, on the other side to the fountains of the river Meander." Of this province, which was more strictly called Asia, the metropolis was Ephesus, the seat of the proconsuls of Asia. The next to Ephesus, in the time of the apostles, was Smyrna ; the same city being also a metropolis : after that, Per- gamus, the seat of the famous king Attalus, as the most learned Spanheim relates in his Introduction to Geography. 10. Phrygia. In the Asian diocese which was subject to the Asiatic vicar. There was a two-fold Phrygia, of which the one was called the greater and Pacatian, the other the lesser and the healthful. The first was bounded to the north by Bithynia and Galatia ; to the east, by the healthful Phrygia and Pisidia ; to the south, by Lydia, Caria, and Lycia ; to the west, by the proconsular Asia. The metropolis of this country was Laodicea, upon the river Lycus. Phrygia the wholesome was conterminous northward to the greater, toward Galatia and Bithynia. The metropolis of which was Synnada, in the ancient Ionia, a colony of the Dorians, originally descended from the Macedonians, as appears by the ancient coins, according to the relation of the fore-cited Spanhemius. Pamphylia. This province was the utmost limit of the Asian diocese to the south, toward the sea-shore, from thence called the Pamphilian Sea. It is bounded to the east by Cilicia and part of Cappadocia; to the west, by Lycia; to the north, by Galatia. " Formerly," saith Spanheim, " comprehending Pisidia and Isauria, it was under one and the same governor with Lycia, in the reign of Constantine the Great; but at length made consular under Theodosius the younger, and divided into two parts ; the first part whose metropolis was Sida, and the second whose chief city was Perga." Moreover, although that in Pamphilia and the rest of the provinces already mentioned the Greek language was fre- quently used, yet there was another dialect proper to every country, and differing from that of the adjoining provinces. There- fore Strabo affirms that the Cibyrates made use of four dialects, the Pisidic, Grecian, Lydean, and Solyman. The Syrians also spake two languages at that time, as also the Jews, for they used both the Greek and Syriac. Nay, they might be said to make use of three languages, in regard the Latin was also spoken among them, as the learned Salmaslus observes. Egypt. Of Egypt, thus the learned Michael Baudrand : " Egypt VEE. XX. J LITEllALLY EXPLAINED. 43 is a most famous country of Africa, not of Asia, under the do- minion of the Turks ever since the year 1517. It extends in length from the Mediterranean Sea to Syene. The river Nile runs through the middle of it, whose inundations make it fertile. To its east lie the deserts of Arabia ; to the west, Lybia ; to the south, Ethiopia ; and to the north, the Mediterranean Sea." And the parts of Lybia round about Cyrene. The -upper Lybia was called Pentapolitan, from the number of her cities, of which the names were Berenice, Arsinoe, Ptolemais, ApoUonia, and the most famous of all, Cyrene, from which all the upper Lybia is sometimes called Cyrenaic. " The bounds of this Cyrenaic Lybia," saith Spanheim, " were the greater Syrtis to the west ; the country of the Psylli and the desert Lybia to the . south ; and Marmaric Lybia to the east." See our annotations upon Amos ix. 7 ; Matt. xxvii. 33. And strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes. That is such of the Romans as sojourned in Judea, as well Jews by birth as proselytes. " At Rome," saith Grotius, " there were many Jews, as Cicero and Horace tell us. Also many women and freed men joined them- selves to them, as Tibullus, Ovid, and Philo witness." 11. Cretes. Saith the above-mentioned Spanheim, "Crete, seated between the Lybic and Egaean sea, to the south of the Peloponnesus, and to the east of the island Carpathus, was one of the first that were illuminated with the light of the gospel by the preaching of St. Peter, Acts ii., and the great pains of Paul and Titus." But the most learned Lightfoot believes, ' that by Cretes are understood here the inhabitants of that region of Palestine which we have already observed to be called Creth by the Syrians, in our notes upon Wisdom ii. 5, because the Cretes are here joined with the Arabians, who are contiguous to the land of Palestine. Arabians. Arabia is a country of Asia, neighbouring upon Africa, bounded to the north by Syria and the river Euphrates, to the east by the Persian Gulf; to the west, by the Arabian Gulf; and to the south, by the Arabian Sea, or part of the Indian Ocean. It is threefold; the desert Arabia, where the Israelites abode forty years ; the Happy, or spice-bearing ; and the Stony, famous for the city of Krac, or Harach, which in scripture is called Petra of the Wilderness ; and for Mount Sinai, where God promulgated the law by Moses, which mountain by Ethnic writers is called ' In Disquis. Chorograph. set before his Notes upon St. John's gospel. 44 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. II. Casius. Wherefore Solinus calls the Arabians, ' a people famous for the Mountain Casius, where was the temple of Jupiter, who from thence was entitled Casius. There also lay interred the body of Pompey the Great, whose monument was sumptuously built by Adrian, as Elius Spartianus records in the life of Adrian ; moved thereto, perhaps, by that famous distich, for Adrian was a learned person : " Lieinius' tomb is large, but Cato's small ; Pompey has none ; believe we gods at all !" There was also another Mount Casius in Syria, which is the reason of some confusion among writers. They who desire more of Arabia, may read Strabo, Ptolemy, and Pliny. We have heard. In the Greek, " we do hear," as in the English version ; that is to say, with our own ears. Speaking in our tongues. Not that when one voice was uttered many other echoes as it were dispersed themselves; but that the dis- ciples of Christ spake in the proper languages of them that heard. Tlie wonderful works of God. Which God had prepared before the foundations of the world, to be given to the faithful by Christ. Those wonderful works are called glorious things, Psalm Ixxxvii. 3. 12. What meaneth this ? That is, to what intent is aU this ? 13. Others mocking. In the Greek, "cavilling." Learn from these cavillers, that there is no miracle so great, but scurrilous and impious loquacity will find a quarrel to reproach it. They are full of must. These things being done upon the day- of Pentecost, at what time there is no new wine or must, properly so called. Must seems here to be taken for any sweet wine, or wine boiled out of the must. 14. Eut Peter standing up with the eleven. Armed with boldness, and trusting in the assistance of the newly received Holy Ghost. Lift up his voice. That he might be heard by all, in such a numerous assembly of auditors. Ye men of Jiidea. Peter being about to preach forth Christ to the mutinous multitude, does not presently begin from the prophecy of Joel, but first removes the false report spread by some, that they who spake in various languages, were in the extravagancies of their wine. And presently, by the pleasing address of. Ye men of Judea, courts the goodwill of t;he auditory. For it was an appella- ' Cap. 46. VER. XVII.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 45 tion plausible to those who professed the Jewish religion. Ye men of Judea, in regard that they excelled all other nations for many reasons ; to wit, in regard of the law given from heaven, the honour of the prophets, and the worship of the true God. And all you that live in Jerusalem, He addresses himself to these dwellers in Jerusalem particularly, because they were both in greater number, and of greater quality than the rest. Be this known unto you. As if he had said. Attend with heed to what I am about to say. 15. Seeing it is hut the third hour of the day. Though such be the shame of drunkenness, that it abhors the light, and that they who are drunk are drunk in the night, 1 Thess. v. 7 ; yet there are not a few who, like swine, as soon as they rise do make haste from their beds to their cups. Against whom the prophet darts his Woe be to you ; woe he to you that rise betimes in the morning to follow strong drink, Isa. v. 11. And though Josephus relates' that the Jews upon festival days were never wont to dine till the sixth hour, that is noon, yet that custom was not observed by all ; there being many breakers -of the commandments of God, and violaters of human customs, such as lived in Isaiah's time, chiefly upon festival days, upon which the Jews were commanded to rejoice before the Lord, Lev. xxiii. 40. The words of Peter are therefore to be understood as if he had said, that they were more pious and devout than to be drunk by nine o'clock in the morning, at what time there is no man but moderately temperate who is not fasting. The Chaldee paraphrase upon Eccles. x. Id: "After they have -offered the usual sacrifice, let them eat bread at the fourth hour, which with us is at ten in the morning. Rabbi Salomon Jarchi : ' at the fourth hour,' saith he, ' which is the hour of eating, at what time all people retire to take their meals.' " " 16. But this, &c. As if he had said. But it happens to these persons what Joel had foretold by the spirit of prophecy. In the same manner the Jews refer it to the times of the Messiah, as R. Saadia testifies : ' " Then shall remain a gift of prophecy, among our people, so that our sons and our servants shall pro- phecy, according to that of Joel, and afterwards I will pour forth my Spirit, &c." 17. In the last days. That is, in the times of the Messiah, 1 In Vit. sua. ' In gloss, ad fol. 83, tract. Talmud Baba Metsia. ' Lib. Emounotli, cap. 8. 46 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. II. whioh were the last days of Jerusalem and the Jewish govern- ment. Lufce follows in the citation of this place, and some others, the Hellenist interpreters, though not exactly, the words being sometimes changed and transposed; which [transposing] Moses does also, reciting the decalogue in Deuteronomy. Moreover, by this prophecy of Joel, and by others of -the same nature, God promised that he would endue those that believed in him with a larger proportion of divine knowledge, under the New Testament, than he had done under the Old. But he did not signify that he would do it alone, and without any other means; and that there would be no further use of the holy scripture. But that on the contrary, that extraordinary help, the infusion of the Holy Spirit [should be given] (dreams and visions should chiefly all tend to that), that the mind of God, speaking in the scripture, might be the sooner understood ; to the end, that no person who should with attentive devotion search them, and implore the assistance of the Holy Spirit, should stand in much need of the instruction of another, to understand those things which are necessary to be known for salvation. ^ Upon all fiesh. That is, upon all conditions and sexes believing in Christ, and ready to lead their lives according to his precepts. Wherefore, saith Peter, The Lord has given his Holy Spirit to those that obey him, ch. v. 32. Shall prophesy. As, ch. xxi. 9, 10, 11, the four daughters of Philip the evangelist and Agabus. Shall see visions. That is to say, caused from above, as did Ananias and Peter, ch. ix. 10; x. 11. Says Macrobius upon Scipio's Dream ; " There are five principal diversities and names of things which people seem to see in their sleep. For either it is a dream, or a vision, or an oracle, or an inspiration, or a phantasm, which Cicero calls visum, as oft as hie needed make use of this word." See pur literal explanation upon Joel ii. 28. 18. And I, &c. See our annotations, Joel ii. 29. 19. And will show wonders. Such were the signs forerunning the extirpation of the Jews, which they suffered under the Romans for rejecting Jesus the doctor of perfect justice [teacher of perfect rio-hteousness], and contemning the doctrine of the apostles, in- spired with his Spirit, and Inviting them to repentance. Such were comets hovering over Jerusalem like flaming swords, chariots and armies rushing together in the air; with like events upon the earth, as slaughters, burning of towns and cities, and other calamities VEE. XXI.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 47 that befell the Jews in Galilee and Judea, which use first to por- tend, and then to bring a people's utter destruction. See what we have already said upon Joel ii. 30. 20. The sun shall be turned, &c. See our literal explication upon Joel ii. 31. The great day of the Lord. That is, the great and terrible judgment of Grod upon the refractory Jews. " In the first sense," saith Brenius, " Joel spake this of the destruction by Nebuchad- nezzar, but mystically of the destruction by the Romans ; which is called by way of super-eminency the day of the Lord." Thus also saith Beza, " These things I refer to the nation of the Jews, whose utter destruction being shortly to fall upon the obstinate con- temners of the gospel is foretold, as Christ also positively declares. Matt. xxiv. ; however, joining them with that last day, when the same calamity which formerly befell Jerusalem, shall be the ruin of the whole world, guilty of the same great and outrageous obsti- nacy." Moreover the destruction of the Jews by the Romans is called the great and terrible day of the Lord, as Lightfoot observes in his annotations upon Mark ix. 1 : "It is described as the end of the world. By Periphrasis it is called the last days, or latter times ; that is, the last times of the continuance of this city and government. From that time begins the new world. It is also described as the coming of Christ. His coming in the clouds in glory with the angels ; and then again as the enthroning of Christ and his twelve apostles judging the twelve tribes of Israel." Thus far Lightfoot. Acts ii. 20; 2 Thess. ii. 2, 3 ; Jer. iv. 24, &c.; Matt, xxiv. 29, &c. ; Isa. ii. 2 ; Acts ii. 17; 1 Tim. iv. 1 ; 2 Pet. iii. 13 ; Isa. Ixv. 17 ; 2 Pet. iii. 13; Heb. x. 37; Rev. i. 7; Matt. xix. 28 ; Luke xxii. 30. And not able. In the Greek is epiphanes, by which wor(f the Sep- tuagint used to render the Hebrew word hanora, that signifies "terrible." "Nor is it to be questioned," saith Ludovicus de Dieu, " but that from thence that cruel tyrant Antiochus was called Mpiphanes, " terrible, rather than illustrious." This Antiochus is Called by Polybius, Epimanes, that is to say, " furious," or " raging mad." 21. And it shall come to pass, that all, &c. As if he had said, that whosoever shall in word and deed religiously worship Christ sent by God, shall be delivered from the grievous calamity pre- pared for the Jews. , Thus Paul adapts this prophecy to Christ 48 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. 11. our Saviour, Rom. x. 12, 13. But as the invocation of God is not only taken for prayer directed to him, but frequently for any act of divine worship ; so is also the invocation of Christ, or of his name, taken in the same sense. Gen. xii. 8 ; xiii. 4 ; xxvi. 25 ; 1 Chron. xiii. 6 ; Psa. Ixxix. 6 ; Isa, xii. 25 ; Jer. x. 25 ; Acts ix. 14, 21 ; 1 Cor. i. 2 ; 2 Tim. ii. 22. Now that the Christians were freed from the common calamities of the Jews in the destruction of Jerusalem, we find in Eusebius^:^ "But whereas the whole commonalty and body of believers at the church of Jeru- salem, by oracular foresight inspired into some devout and holy persons, were admonished to depart the city before the war, and seat themselves in a town beyond Jordan, called by the name of Pella: and now all those that believed in Christ, having translated themselves from the forsaken Jerusalem to Pella, then it was that the royal city and capital seat of the nation, being deserted by the holy people, was overwhelmed by divine vengeance, for so many crimes committed both against Christ and his apostles, so that the whole race of those" wicked people perished." See my annotations upon Joel ii. 32. 22. Jesus of Nazareth. In the Greek, " Jesus the Nazarene," who being conceived, educated, and leading the most part of his life in Nazareth of Galilee, according to the predictions of the prophets, might well be called Nazarene. See our literal explanation. Matt. ii. 23. Approved of God. As if he had said. The person whom God by most pow^erful and not to be contradicted proofs, had demonstrated to be by him to you sent, seeing that he wrought so many and such great miracles in your sight, which no man could have efifected but by a divine power. . The same also Nicodemus acknow- -ledged, John iii. 2. Master, said that great senator of the San- hedrim, we know that thou comest from God, for no man can work those miracles which thou dost, unless God were with him. Among you, A Hebraism, for "to you," that is to say, to be by him sent to you. By miracles, wonders, and signs. A synonym, which figure we make use of when we think one word not sufficient to explain the dignity and value of the thing. But why miracles are called both miracles, wonders, and signs, we have already declared upon Matt. xxiv. 24. ' 3 Hist. S. TER. XXIV.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 49 In the midst of you. That is, before your eyes. But token he had wrought so many signs before them, they believed not in him, John xii. 37. 23. This, &c. This Jesus, by the decree of the Father whom he in all things voluntarily obeyed, being surrendered into your power, with an incredible importunity you forced the Romans to nail him to the cross. By the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God delivered. In the Greek, "yielded up." "They are said to be yielded up," saith Grotius, " who are delivered up to their enemies." There- fore Christ by the determinate decree of God was given up into the power and disposal of his enemies, whose hostile and inhuman rage God did not predestinate, as the divines do speak, but only fore- knew. " Predestination," saith St. Austin,^ " cannot be without foreknowledge, but foreknowledge may be without predestination. For by predestination God foreknew those things which he was to act; but he may foreknow those things which he himself does not do ; as all manner of sins. For though there are some which are in such a manner sins, as to be the punishment of sins — hence it is said, God gave th^m over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient, Horn. i. 28 — ^yet there is no sin in what iS attribute4 to God, but judgment." Thus far St. Austin. And by the hands of the wicked. In the Greek, " of the lawless." The Jews called those lawless and sinners which are vulgarly called pagans. But here Peter means the Roman soldiers, who are called sinners. Matt. xxvi. 45 ; Mark xiv. 41 ; Luke xxiv. 7. See 1 Cor. ix. 15. Ye slew. He that is the author and abettor of murder is said to ' commit the murder. 24. Whom God hath raised up. Most excellently, St. Austin :- " No dead person is the raiser of himself. He could raise himself, who was not dead though his flesh were dead. For he raised that which was dead ; he who lived in himself raised himself, but was dead in the flesh that was to be raised. For the Father alone did not raise the Son, of whom it is said by the apostles, for which God raised him ; but also the Lord raised himself, that is, his own body ; therefore said he, Destroy this body, and in three days I will raise it," John ii. 19, "But who is so mad," saith the same St. ' De PredeBt. S8. cap x. ' Serm. viit. de Verb. Dom. E 50 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. 11. Austin,' " as to aay, that the Holy Spirit did not operate in the resurrection of Christ, seeing that he operated the man Christ himself?" Having loosed the pains of hell. The Greek has, " of death," as in the English version, that is, having loosed the bands of the sepulchre ; or, which is the same thing, having broken the strong cords of death with which Christ had surrendered himself to be bound, laying down his soul that he might re-assume it, Johnx. 17; alluding to the swathings of the dead, or to the cords with which malefactors are bound when led to execution, to prevent their crafty means to escape. From these bands God set Christ at liberty, recalling him to a life never to be ended. " The Hebrew word chebel" saith Sir Edward Leigh,^ "signifies two things, a cord or a fetter, or the torments or pangs, more especially of a child-bearing _ woman. Hence this word occurring to the seventy interpreters, where it certainly signifies cords or bonds, Ps. xviii. 5, see margin, they turn the word, sharp pains ; and so in other places, 1 Kings XX. 31, &c. And here St. Luke following their example uses the words, the pains of death, or as some of the ancients, with the Syriao interpreter, have read, ' of hell.' Where both additions of the words ' loosing' and ' holding,' show bonds or cords to be here denoted by pains." It was impossible, &c. As if he had said. He might be bound with the cords of death, but he could not be detained bound by those bonds, though never so strong, who had power to lay down his life, and power to resume it, and only laid it down that he might resume it, John x. 17, 18. Of it. That is, either of death or of hell ; in whose bonds being held and bound, he was free to break the cords. For hell in this verse is taken either for the grave, or for the common receptacle of all souls separated by death from the body ; which most of the ancient interpreters, both Jews and Christians, believe to be signified in scripture by the word hell. Hence that of Hilarius,' " This Is the law of human necessity: that the bodies being buried, the souls descend to hell, which descent, to the full finishing of all that belonged to a true man, the Lord himself did not refuse." Moreover, this word hell, taken for the common place of separated souls, the Hebrews call Sheol, the Greeks Hades, and both divide * Contra Ser. Ar. cap. xv. » In Supplement. Critic Sac. ' In Psalm cxxxviii. VEtt. XXVI. J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 51 the place into two parts, of which the Hebrews call the one Paradise, the Greeks Elysium ; the other is by the Greeks called Tartarus, by the Hebrews Gehenna. " Therefore Christ," saith Ja. Windet, "was in Paradise, and by the same way in hell. Therefore St. Austin laboured in vain, and might have spared himself the trouble which he spends upon that question pro- pounded in his Epistle to Dardanus, and elsewhere. And when we believe, itujcording to the Creed, in Christ descending into hell, those are deceived who believe the meaning to be, that he descended into the place of torment, commonly called hell." 25. For David speaketh concerning Mm. As if he had said. For the Holy Ghost, who spake by the mouth of David, representing the person of Christ, looking upon Christ as being dead, spake these words, Ps. xvi. 8, &c. I foresaw the Lord always before my face. That is, the majesty of God represented itself before my eyes day and night, that I might submit myself wholly to his power and disposal. , For he is on my right hand that I should not be moved. As if he had said. By his help and assistance, I overcome [in] most difficult labours. " To be at the right hand," saith Genebrard, " is to be prepared and ready to assist." 26. Therefore. That is, because I have God to assist me in overcoming any hardships or dangers whatsoever. Did my heart rejoice. That is, I rejoice with all my heart. " Preterperfect tenses," saith Vatablus, "among the Hebrews, are used for futures and presents." And my tongue was glad. The Hebrew has it, " my glory," or " honour." That is, and my gladness excites me to sing a hymn. " Honour or glory," saith Moller, " is taken for the tongue. As, My honour, be not thou united. Gen. xlix. 6 ; that is, I did not approve their crimes with my tongue : nor did I by my command excite them to perpetrate evil. Therefore then is the tongue so called, as being that member particularly framed to celebrate the honour lof God and the praises of men. See Ps. xxx. 12; Ivii. 8. And for that reason they who revile God or men, their tongues are deservedly called dishonour and infamy." Moreover also my flesh shall rest in hope. The Hebrew has it, " in safety." As if he had said, Although it may happen that my body may lie prostrate in the cold arms of death, enclosed within the sepulchre, yet my confident hope of returning from death to E 2 52 THE ACTS OP THE HOL-J APOSTLES [CHAP. II- life affords me tranquillity and security of mind. Saith Kimchi, in Ps. xvi. -9, "While I live my flesh shall remain in safety, because he shall deliver me from all harm." But in a mysterious sense, he believes it to be as if he had said, " After death my flesh shall lie in the grave secure from worms, because they shall have no power over it." 27. For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell. The sense in refer- ence to David is, 1 Sam. xxii. 1, thou wilt not suflfer me to be slain by Saul ; but in relation to the Messiah, of whom David's concerns were types, thou wilt not leave me long in the state of the dead, or, which is the same thing, thou wilt not suffer my soul, laid down for my sheep, to be a long time shut up within the receptacle of souls separated from the body, into which I descended to satisfy the law of death, as Ireneus speaks.' Worthily, there- fore, Grotius : - " True it is," saith he, " that hell is a place sub- tracted from our sight, and when it is understood in reference to the body it signifies the grave, where the body lies without a soul, but in reference to the soul it denotes that region or state wherein the soul remains without the body. Therefore as Dives was. in hell, so was also Lazarus, the regions only being distinguished. For both Paradise and Grehenna, or, as the Greeks called those places, Tartarus and Elysium, were in hell. And that this was the opinion of the Greeks, is most certain, whom Virgil follows in the sixth of his ^neids. Nor let any one question the Jews, for whom I bring Josephus to vouch, who says that the prophet Samuel was raised by the witch out of hell. The same author, speaking of the Sadducees, ' They take away,' saith he, ' all pun- ishments and rewards out of hell.' Again, where he sets down the opinion of the Pharisees, he appoints the seat both of punish- ment and reward in helly under ground, because the infernal regions by the Greeks are called subterranean, either because hell was thought to be under ground, or rather because it is no more in sight than the most hidden recesses which the earth conceals. Josephus,^ reciting the ojtinions of the Essenes, places the souls of the godly beyond the ocean, to which in another place, according to the judgment of the same persons, he allots the most holy region of heaven. But indeed those phrases of speech, under the earth, in the air, beyond the ocean, and what we find in Tertullian, beyond the fiery zone, signify no more than that which » Lib. V. cap. 26. ' Upon Luke xvi. 13. = De BelL Jud. lib. ii. cap. 12. VER. XXIX.] LITERALLY EXfLAINKD. 53 is invisible, and inaccessible to us." Thus far Grotius, to which he adds that place of St. Ambrose:' " It had been enough to have said to those philosophers, that souls, set at liberty from the body, went directly to Hades, that is, to a place which is not seen, which we call in Latin infemus" And, lastly, the scripture calls those receptacles of separated souls, magazines. Thy Holy One. In the Hebrew, "thy bountiful." That is, him who never, nor in no place, found thy bounteousness and loving-kindness withdrawn from him. To see corruption. That is, to be corrupted. Thus to see death is to die, Luke ii. 26. The Hebrew word nrnif, which properly signifies corruption, or putrefaction, as the two great apostles, Peter here, and Paul, ch. xiii. 34, urge the emphasis of it, is nevertheless very often taken for a ditch or pit, where dead bodies lie putrefying. So the Greek word whereby Luke expresses the-^ Hebrew word, is by the interpreters of the Old Testement, not only used to denote bare corruption, but also the place of putre- faction, Ps. Ivii. 6, and xciv. 13. " To see the pit," saith Vatablus, " is to be laid in a pit to suffer putrefaction," Ps. vii. 15 ; ix. 15 ; Prov. xxvi. 27. The sense, therefore, of this half verse in refer- ence to David is. Thou wilt not suffer me, being through thy benignity appointed to reign, to die a sad death by the hand of my enemies; in relation to the Messiah typified by David, Thou wilt not suffer me, toward whom thou bearest a love most singular and ineffable, to lie so long in the grave, Ijll my body be rotten. 28. Thou hast made known to me the way of life. In the Hebrew, " Thou wilt make . me know the path of life." In respect of David, it signifies. Thou wilt open me a most certain way to deliver me from the death designed me by my enemies. In respect of the Messiah, Thou wilt bring me back from death to perpetual and immortal life. Thou shalt make me full of joy. That is, thou shalt heap joy and comfort upon me. With thy face. As if he had said, being by thee beheld with a benign and gracious aspect. 29. Men and brethren. A kind compellation to gain the affections of the hearers. Neither does Peter in the least deny the cited words of Ps. xvi. to be anywise understood of David ; but urges them to be so uttered by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, that ' De Bono Mortis, cap. 10. 54 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. II. literally and properly they are not to be understood of David, but of Christ, of whom David [was] made a representation. Of the patriarch David. Patriarch, is a compound Greek word oipatria, signifying "family," and arche, "beginning." However, every father of a family is not called a patriarch iy the Hellenists, but only they who in Hebrew are called the heads, or chief of the fathers; that is, the fathers of the fathers of a family, and the founders of the whole family aJid kindred. They are called the heads of the fathers, Exod. vi. 25 ; and 1 Chron. vs.. 9, patriarchs. And thus David is properly called a patriarch, because he was the founder of the royal family; which is called in Greek patria, "lineage," Luke ii. 4. And so below, ch. vii. 8, 9, the twelve sons of Jacob are called patriarchs, because the several tribes derived their names from them, as being the founders of their race, and deduced their original from them. So Abraham is called a patriarch, Heb. vii. 4, because the whole race of the elect people of God descended from his loins. There were also other patriarchs improperly so called, not in respect of pedigree, but in regard of their superiority and precedency. Thus they, whom the author of the Chronicles calls princes of the tribes of Israel, 1 Chron. xxvii. 22, the Greeks call patriarchs of the tribes, and in this sense also King David, advanced to the most supreme degree of dignity, might be styled a patriarch. Such were the patriarchs improperly so called, whom the Hellenist Jews, after the destruc- tion of Jerusalem, chose for their chieftains. "Therefore," says the learned Heidegger,^ " Hadrian to Severianus the consul makes mention of the patriarch of the Jews dwelling in Alexandria.'' Epiphanius also relates in his disputation against the Ebionites, • That some part of the Jews in his time inhabited the city of Tiberias, who acknowledged a head or supreme, to whom they gave the title of patriarch; to whom also were joined several assistants, who were called apostles.' From which custom to think that Christ gave to his disciples the name of apostles, is a gross mistake of Baronius,* as Casaubon learnedly makes out. But in the Christian church, as being a spiritual family, after the passion of Christ several bishops were called fathers, and archbishops patriarchs j that is to say, chief among the fathers. Whom it was lawful to suffer, if not as fathers, at least as pedagogues in Christ, * Exercitat i. Hist. Patriarch, n. 6. » Vopiac. in the Life of Saturnin. ' Ad Annum '62, a. S. VEK. XXXI.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 55 1 Cor. iv. 15. But the ambition of these persons increasing, the chief archbishops, whom they called bishops of the highest seat, usurped this title to themselves; till at length four of them obtained this title to be conferred upon them principally above all the rest ; the patriarchs of Rome, of Alexandria, of Antioch, and Jerusalem; to whom was added at length the patriarch of Con- stantinople, made the second, by reason of the new Rome's dignity." Is dead. He died on the feast of Pentecost, if we may believe the Jerusalem Talmud. His sepulchre. With which the bones and ashes of David are covered. 30, Of the fruit of his loins. The words are taken out of the 132nd Psalm, ver. 11, where the Greek has it, "of the fruit of thy belly;" that is, by the birth of thy wife. The same sense answers to both. There is added here in the Greek text, "to raise Christ according to the flesh." But there is no reason appearing why this addition, which the Greek copies have, and Chrysostom has expressed, should be brought into the least sus- picion of being untrue. " For," saith the learned Ludovicus de Dieu, "when Luke does not relate what was singly sworn to David, but what David as a prophet knew to be sworn to him, it did not behove him barely to recite the words of the promise, but to explain how David as a prophet understood them. God had promised to David, that he would settle in his throne one of the fruit of his loins ; that David, as a prophet, knew to be nothing else but that God would raise Christ according to the flesh, from the fruit of his loins, to sit upon his throne." To sit upon his throne. Christ is said to sit upon David's throne, because he was designed by God to be his successor, who after a celestial and divine manner should reign over the house of Jacob, that is, the people of God, over whom David had received from God the earthly dominion. For which reason Christ himself affirms that he has the key, that is, the power and empire of David, though his throne be not established upon earth, but translated to heaven, and that all powers both in heaven and earth are subjected to his empire, together with angels, good and evil, all people, tongues, nations, and even death and hell itself. 31. He seeing this before. As if he had said, David understand- ing by the spirit of prophecy, that it was pronaised him that Christ should be raised from his seed, by the same prophetic knowledge 56 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. II. foretold that the soul of Christ should not be long left in a con- dition separated from the body, nor his body remain so long in the sepulchre as to be reduced to dust, before it should be raised, Ps. cxxxii. and 2 Sam. vii. ; Ps. xvi. 32. Whereof loe are witnesses. As if he had said, "We all attest that this Jesus was called from the dead, not by report, but by those certain signs, of which we were all sensible by seeing, hear- ing, and feeling. 33. Tlierefore being by the right hand of God exalted. As much as to say, this Jesus being taken up into heaven by the divine power. And by the promise, &c. That is, and having received the gift of the Holy Ghost, which he as Mediator between God and man had often promised us, this has he largely and plentifully be- stowed upon us, as by our sudden speaking of languages we never learnt is apparently demonstrable to you. 34. For David did not ascend into heaven. That is, to the heavenly throne, which is typified by his earthly throne. But he saith himself. So Christ, Matt. xxii. 43 ; Mark xii. 36 ; and Luke xx. 42. Hence it is clear, that it was a thing confessed and apparent to the ancient Jews, that the 110th Psalm contained prophecy concerning the Messiah, and that David was the writer thereof. " And indeed," saith Grotius, upon the foresaid place of Matthew, " the inscription in the Hebrew copies is, A hymn of David, which alone sufficiently argues that it is not to be attri- buted] to Eliezer, or any other writer in the times of Hezekiah. For though we should grant that the Psalms' titles were not added by their own authors, yet they appear to be of very great anti- quity ; and to enervate the credit of them, not by argument, but at our own conceited pleasures, [were] to be mad for love of con- tention. The Septuagint render the word Ledavid, " to David ;" but the paraphrasts and other Jews render it better " of David " in the second case. For if we should otherwise interpret it, there would be none of the Psalms which might certainly be thought David's. Whereas the Jews themselves do all confess, that several of the Psalms having the same inscription, Ledavid, were nevertheless written by David." The Lord said. to my Lord. That is, the Eternal Father be- spake the Messiah to be born of me according to the flesh, who nevertheless ia my Lord, because he is the only begotten Son of VEU. XXXVIII.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 57 the Eternal Father. Rabbi Saadias' testifies also that the Messiah is here called Lord by David. Sit thou at my right hand. That is, sit thou and reign in the heavenly throne, as the apostle explains it. He does not say, stand before me, but sit; which signifies regal and judicial power. Neither does he say, sit at my feet, but at my right hand ; that is, be thou next in power to me, 1 Cor. xv. 25 ; Heb. x. 12, 13. 35. Until I make, &c. "The word Mnft7,"saith Genebrard, "uses to be taken emphatically for emn until, and signifies continuance, not [to the] exclusion of future time, to which it is by no means opposed ; as if he had said, reign with me also until I have put thy enemies under thy feet; also, all the time that seems to be contrary and opposite to thy reign; also, before I have subdued thy enemies at thy feet, even before the devU, death, the wicked, and all sin be utterly extirpated. For it is not to be questioned but that at all other times Christ shall reign. Observe, therefore, that by this and the like particles, the scripture and the Hebrew language affirm what might otherwise be called in question, Ps. cxxiii. 2, Our eyes are fixed upon the Lord, until he shall have compassion upon us. That is, even until or before he shows us his mercy; that is, in our time of distress. Matt, xxviii. 20, 1 am with you until the end of the world ; that is, even until the end of the world, before which time, it seems, many things may happen to fall out contrary to it." 36. Assuredly, &c. That is, let this truth be to you most certain and undoubted, that this Jesus whom you demanded to' the most ignoble and ignominious death of the cross, is appointed by God the Messiah, promised both in the law and the prophets, and invested with all power both in heaven and earth. 37. What shall we do ? That is, by what means shall we obtain pardon of so heinous a crime committed by us, when we demanded this Jesus, constituted Lord of heaven and earth, the Messiah promised in the law and the prophets, to be put to the scandalous and ignominious death of the cross. 38. Bepent. The Greek, "Be wise again," or "return to per- fect understanding." As if he had said. So do you repent of the fact, that you may not only change your thoughts, but also your lives for the better, and compose yourselves to live according to the rule of his divine precepts. "Nothing makes true repentance," ' Upon Dan. vji. 13. 58 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. II. saith St. Austin,' " but the hatred of sin and love of God." See my annot. upon Matt. iii. 2, 8, in that edition" which I dedicated to the Kight Honourable Henry Compton, Lord Bishop of London, whose most ardent zeal for true religion and virtue, and most liberal and munificent charity both to me and the rest of the French ftotestants, no oblivion can ever be able to obscure. And be baptized, &c. That is, according to the command of Christ, let every one of you, struck with a real sorrow for his sins, be plunged in water ; because that sacred immersion has been instituted by Christ, like a certain signet, diploma, or patent, by which he confirms the remission and utter defacing of their sins to all those who seek to him with an unfeigned faith, as the only Physician of their souls ; so that their sins shall never more be remembered or imputed to them. The sacred ceremony of baptism is not to be performed by the sprinkling only, or pouring on of a little water, but by the plunging of the whole body of them that are to be baptized; as, first, the proper signification of the Greek word baptizo declares. " This," saith Casaubon, ^ " was the rite of baptizing, that persons were plunged into the water, which the very word baptizo sufficiently demonstrates. Which as it does not extend so far as to sink down to the bottom, to the hurt of the person, so is it not to swim upon the superficies. Therefore we are apprehensive that it is not without cause what some have disputed, that baptism ought to be administered by plunging the whole body into the water, for they urge the word baptize." See our annot. chap. i. ver. 5, and our literal explication. Matt. iii. 6 and Mark i. 5. Secondly. The example of Christ, Matt. iii. 16, and Mark i. 9, Whence the Synod of Calcuith, a.d. 816,* where Wulfrid, arch- bishop of Canterbury presided. " Let," saith he, " the presbyters beware, that when they administer the sacrament of baptism, they do not pour water upon the heads of the infants, but let them be always plunged in the font, according to the example of the Son of God himself, who was thrice plunged in the waters of Jordan. Thus mi^st this ceremony be performed according to order." See our lit. expl. Matt. iii. 15. Thirdly. The constant practice of the universal church till the time of Clement V., who was crowned pope anno. 1305, under > Serm. 7, De Temp. ' [Londini, 1678.] ' Upon Matt. iii. 6. ♦ Can. 11. [Wilkins, i. 179.1 YER. XXXVIII.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 59 whom first of all the second Synod of Kavenna approved the abuse introduced into some churches about a hundred years before, that baptism without any necessity should be administered by aspersion. Hence it came to pass, that contrary to the analogy, or intended mystical signification of this sacrament, all the west for the most part has in this age the use of rhantism, that is, sprinkling, instead of baptism, as Zepper speaks, to the great scandal of the Greeks and Russians, who to this day plunge into the water those they baptize, and deny any one to be rightly baptized who is not plunged into the water, according to the precept of Christ, as we may find in Sylvester Sguropulus, and Cassander.' " The custom of the ancient church was not sprink- ling, but immersion, in pursuance of the sense of the word baptizing in the commandment, and of the example of our blessed Saviour ;" saith Dr. Jeremy Taylor." " The Greek word baptein," saith Salmasius in the notes of divers upon Sulpitius Severus,' "from which the word baptizein is derived, signifies immersion, not sprinkling. Nor did the ancients otherwise baptize than by single or treble immersion. In the Ghreek church at this day, the person to be baptized is plunged over head and ears." The same thing does Peter Avitabile testify of the Asian Christians inha- biting Iberia and Colchi. " Only they who are bed-ridden," saith Salmasius, " because they lie down, were baptized as convenience would permit, not as they who plunge their heads under water, but by pouring the water upon their whole bodies. Thus Novatus was baptized in his sickness by effusion all over, not by im- mersion."* Gregory Nazianzen relates many and various names of this sacrament,* among which are these two, baptism and washing. And adding the reason for these appellations, " it was called," says he, "washing, because thereby sin is washed away; and baptism, in regard that sin is thereby signified to be buried." For, as saith St. Ambrose,^ " Water is that wherein the body is plunged, to wash all sin away. There all vice is buried." Which, in the book inscribed, " Eeformation of the Ecclesiastical Laws," printed at London, 1641, is expressed in these words, " While we are plunged in the water, the" death and burial of Christ is recom- mended to us, that we openly testify that sin lies dead and buried > Concil. Florent. sect. ix. cap. 9, and Lib. of Infants' Baptism, p. 693. > Ductor Dubit, Ub. iii. cap. i. reg. IS. numb. 9. ' St. Martin's Life, n. 16. ♦ Euseb. 6, Hist. cap. 43. ' Orat. 40. « Lib. De Initiandis. 60 THE ACTS OF THE HOLTt APOSTLES [CHAP. II. in US. For, as saith St. Bernard, immersion is a representation of death and burial." But to substitute in the room of immersion, either sprinkling, or any other way of applying water to the body, to signify the same thing, is not in the power of the dispensers of God's mysteries, or of the church. For that, as Tho. Aquinas excellently well observes, " It belongs to the signifier to determine what sign is to be used for the signification ; but God it is, who by things sensible signifies spiritual things in the sacraments." The church has no more power than was derived to it from the apostles. Now the apostles were endued by Christ after his resurrection with authority to preach throughout all nations the observance of all his precepts, Matt, xxviii. 20. But never was there any power granted to them to change the least tittle in any of the conimands of Christ, much less of adding any new by their own authority. Lastly. There is another thing that evinces the necessity of plunging the parties to be baptized, for that St. Peter asserts, 1 Pet. iii. 20, 21, the genuine end of baptism was not to represent the inward washing away from sin, which may be represented by any exterior washing of the body, but to express the death and resurrection of Christ, as also our own, and our belief of both resurrections, as the most famous Sir Norton KnatchbuU, in his learned Notes, printed at Oxford, A.r*. 1677, with the licence of the vice-chancellor, observes upon that place of Peter, whose words, though long, I cannot but transcribe, they are so full of truth and weight. "The sense and meaning of Peter is," saith he, " that baptism, which now saves us by water, that is, by the assistance of water, and is anti-typical to the ark of Noah, does not signify the laying down of the filth of the flesh in the water, but the covenant of a good conscience toward God, while we are plunged in the water, which is the true use of water in baptism, thereby to testify our belief in the resurrection of Jesus Christ ; so that there is a manifest antithesis between these words hy water, and by the resurrection, nor is the elegancy of it displeasing. As if he should say, the ark of Noah, not the flood, was the type of baptism, and baptism was an anti-type of the ark ; not as baptism is a washing away of the filth of the flesh by water, wherein it answers not at all to the ark ; but as it is the covenant of a good conscience toward God by the resurrection of Christ, in the belief of which resurrection we are saved, as they were saved in the ark VER. XXXVIII. J UTEKALLY EXVLAINED. 61 of Noah. For the ark and baptism were both a type and figure of the resurrection, so that the proper end of baptism ought not to be understood as if it were a sign of the washing away of sin, although it be thus oftentimes taken metonymically in the New Testament, and by the fathers, but a particular signal of the resur- rection, by faith in the resurrection of Christ. Of which, baptism is a lively and emphatical figure, as also was the ark out of which Noab returned forth as from the sepulchre to a new life, and therefore, not unaptly called by Phllo, ' the captain of the new creation.' And then, the whale's belly, out of which Jonas after a burial of three days was set at liberty ; and the cloud, an,d the Red Sea, in which the people of Israel are said to have been baptized ; that is, not washed, but buried ; for they were all types of the same thing as baptism, not of the washing away of sin, but of the death and resurrection of Christ, and of our own. To which truth the apostles, the fathers, the scholastics, and all interpreters agree. The thing is so apparent as not to need any testimonies ; but because there are not a few, who do not vul- garly teach this doctrine, it will not be superfluous to produce some of those innumerable testimonies, that I may not seem to speak without book. And first, let us begin with St. Paul : Know ye not that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ, were baptized into his death ? Therefore, we are buried with him by baptism into death, that like as Christ was raised up from the dead hy the Father of glory, so we also should walk in newness of life, Kom vi. 3, 4. See also, CoL ii. 12. Else what shall they do who are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? 1 Cor. xv. 29. As if he had said. If there be no resurrection, why are we baptized ? In vain does the church use the symbol of baptism, if there be no resurrection. The like testimonies frequently occur among the fathers : ' That believing in his death, we may be made partakers of his resurrection by baptism.' ' Baptism given in memory of the death of our Lord.' ' ' "W-e perform the symbols of his death and resurrection in baptism.' ^ ' We know but one saving baptism, in regard there is but one death for the world, and one resurrection from the dead, of which baptism is an image." ' Hear Paul ex- claiming. They passed through the sea, and were all baptized in the chud and in the sea. He calls baptism the .passage of the sea, for it ' Ignat, Epist. ad Tral. Id. Epist. ad Philadelph. ' Justin Martyr. ' Basil the Great. 62 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. II. was the (flight of death caused by the water.' ' ' To be baptized and plunged, and so to return up, and rise out of the water, is a symbol of the descent into hell, and return from thence.' ^ ' Bap- tim is a pledge and representation of the resurrection.' ^ ' Bap- tism is an earnest of the resurrection.' * * Immersion is a repre- sentation of death and burial.' * Innumerable are the testimonies which might be added ; but these I think sufficient to prove that baptism is an image of the death and resurrection of Christ, (from whence we acknowledge the mystery of our religion, his deity and humanity, Kom. i. 4,) and of all the faithful, who are baptized in his faith, from death in sin to newness of life, which, if they lead in this world, they have a most assured hope that being dead they shall hereafter rise to glory with Christ. Which things, if they be so, I beseech you, what affinity is to be seen between a burial and a washing, that Christian baptism should be thought to drawits original from Jewish lotions and divings? For if it were true that the end of our baptism were to signify a washing or ablution, or if it were true that the Jews of old did admit their children or proselytes into their church by the adminis- tration of any diving, as it is asserted by many learned persons of late days, I confess it might be a probable argument that our baptism was fetched from the divings of the Jews. But to prove that our baptism is indeed an image of death and resurrection, not of washing, enough has been said. But as to their argument who would have' our baptism to be derived from the Jewish lotions, as there is nothing of certainty in it, so is it so far from being grounded upon aoy authority of scripture, that there are hardly any footsteps to be found thereof in the Old Testament. They deduce the original of baptism from the Hebrew word 033, which signifies " to wash," or " cleanse," Exod. xix. 10. But the rabbins, if I am not deceived, make use of the Hebrew word ^jn^D, which signifies immersion, thereby making it appear that they owe the notion of that word to the Greeks, or rather to the Christians. For what affinity is there between lotion and immersion ? Besides that, we find some to have been baptized in sand. But the thing is so uncertain, that it cannot be said of the rabbins that there were not several among them who differed very much about this matter ; for, in the very text cited by the forementioned learned ' Basil of ^eleucia. ' Chrysostom. ' Ambrose. ' Lactantiui. * Bernard. VEK. XXXVIU.J LITERALLY EXPLAIKED. 63 men. Rabbi EHezer expressly contradicts Eabbi Joshua, who was the first that I know of who asserted this sort of baptism among the Jews. For Rabbi Eliezer, who was contemporary with Rabbi Joshua, if he did not live before him, asserts that a proselyte cir- cumcised and not baptized, was a true proselyte, for so we read of the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, that they were circum- cised, but not baptized. But Rabbi Joshua affirms, that he who was baptized, not he who was circumcised, was a true proselyte. To whom shall I give credit? To Eliezer, who asserts what the scripture confirms, or to Joshua, who affirms what is nowhere to be found in scripture? But the rabbins upheld Joshua's side, and what wonder was it ? for it made for their business, that is, for the honour of the Jewish religion, that the Christians should borrow their ceremonies from them. But when I see men of great learning in these times fetching the foundations of truth from the rabbins, I cannot but hesitate a little. For whence was the Talmud sent us? (They are the words of Buxtorf, in his Synagoga Judaica,) * that we should give so much credit thereto, that from thence we should believe that the law of Moses either can or ought to be understood ? ' Much less the gospel, to which they were professed enemies. For the Talmud is called a ' laby- rinth of errors, and the foundation of Jewish fables.' It was brought to perfection, and held for authentic five hundred years after Christ; therefore it is unreasonable to rest upon the testimony of it. And that which moves me most, Josephus, (to omit all the fathers that lived before the Talmud was finished) who was also a Jew, and contemporary with Rabbi Eliezer, who also wrote in particular of the rites, customs, and acts of the Jews, is altogether silent in this matter ; so that it is an argument to me next to a demonstration, that two such eminent persons, both Jews, and living at the same time, the one should positively deny, the'other make no mention of baptism among the Jews. Besides, if baptism in the modern sense, were in use among the Jews in ancient times, why did the Pharisees ask John Baptist, Why dost thou baptize^ if thou art not Christ, nor Elias, nor that prophet? John i. 25. Do they not plainly intimate that baptism was not in use before, and that it was a received opinion among them, that there should be no baptism, till either Christ, or Elias, or that prophet came. How then there should be so much affinity between bap- tism and the divings of the Jews, that the one should be sue- 64 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY A.POSTLES [cHAP. H- "cessive to the other by any right or pretence, is altogether, I confess, beyond my faith. They say that Arrian calls a Jew ' dipped ;' but I, as his commentator does, beHeve that he spake confusedly, and that he rather meant a Christian than a Jew, as m another place he calls the Christians, Galileans : likewise, Lubm upon Juvenal, Sat. iii. v. 14, observes, that there, by Jews, are meant Christians, who being expelled the city by Domitian, were forced to betake themselves to the woods that were sacred to heathenish superstitions. Therefore, that I may conclude, I say with Alexander de Hales, tinctio, that is 'dipping,' is the formal ca;use of baptism." Thus far the most learned, and highly de- serving of sacred writings. Sir Norton KnatchbuU, knight and baronet. " Now," saith Grotius, " that the ancients made use of the word tinffere instead of baptizare, is not to be wondered at, seeing the Latin word tingere is properly the same in signification, and frequently used for mersare, ' to dip or to plunge Hence it is that Magnus, in St. Cyprian, doubts whether they are to be accounted rightly initiated Christians, who are only initiated by sprinkling or pouring, in cases of sickness or weakness. To which Cyprian answers, " That whatever benefit accrues by the saving sacrament, that sprinkling, or pouring upon, necessity so enforcing, and God indulging, affords to the believer." " And this is the sense and law of the Church of England ; not that it be indifferent, but that all infants be dipped, except in the case of sickness, and then sprinkling is permitted. And, therefore, although in cases of need and charity, the church of England does not want some good examples in the best times to counte- nance that permission, yet we are to follow her command, because that command is not only according to the meaning and intent of the word ' baptize,' but agrees with the mystery of the sacrament itself. For we are buried with him in baptism, saith the apostle. The old man is buried, and drowned in the immersion under water, and when the baptized person is lifted up from the water, it represents the resurrection of the new man to newness of life. In this case, therefore, the contrary custom, being not only against an ecclesiastical law, but against the analogy and mysterious signification of the sacrament, is not to be complied with, unless in such cases that can be of themselves sufficient to justify a liberty in a ritual and ceremony; that is, a case of necessity." Thus the learned Jeremy Taylor, bishop of Down. VGK. XXXVm.J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 65 But the holy martyr Cyprian binds nobody to his opinion con- cerning those that are sprinkled, or poured upon, in case of sickness or weakness. "Wherein," saith he, « our moderation doth hinder nobody from thinking what he believes, and doing what he thinks." Yea, verily, Cornelius, the Eoman bishop and martyr, contem- porary with Cyprian, in a synod of fifty bishops, questioned whether sprinkling or pouring upon the sick or weak might be called a baptism or no : as we may see in his epistle to Fabius, bishop of Antiochia.! Indeed, that the sick as well as the healthy were wont to be plunged, "which is properly to be baptized," says Pamelius in his Notes upon Cyprian's Epistle to Magnus, besides other proofs I omit [in order] to be brief, the acts of several saints do testify; as in the acts of St. Sebastian, the martyr, we find that Tranquillinus, a nobleman, afflicted with the gout, was so baptized by Polycarp the presbyter, and restored to health by his baptism. Also a paralytic Jew, who having long tried the physi- cian's art in vain, bethought himself of the application of Christian baptism, and being brought in his bed to the font or dipping place, at the appointment of Atticus, who succeeded Chrysostom in the Constantinopolitan see, was plunged over head and ears, which being done, he was immediately freed from his distemper, and restored to perfect health. " Therefore, if, rejecting the errors of human contention, we return with a religious and sincere faith to evangelic authority and apostolic tradition, we shall find' it most safe for them who by necessity, and altogether necessary for them who lying under no necessity were only sprinkled or poured upon, to be obedient to Christ, who commanded neither sprinkling nor effusion, but immersion, and to be plunged into the water ac- cording to his institution, who is made to all that obey him the cause of eternal salvation, Heb. v. 9. Nor is there any reason why they should be afraid of repeating baptism, or of the scandal of any church : " because," as St. Gregory says most excellently well,^ "that is not said to be iterated, which is not certainly demonstrated to have been rightly and duly done." And as he says in another place, " if there be an offence taken at the truth, it is much better that offence be taken, than that the truth should be deserted." * The customs of churches ought to submit to the words of Christ, not the words of Christ to be wrested to the ' Apud Niccphorum, lib. vi. cap. 3. ' Socrates, lib. vii. cap. 4. • Lib. i. Ep. 7. ' * Horn. 7, in Ezechiel. F 66 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. II. customs of the church, in regard the words of Christ are the foundation upon which all church customs are to be built, that they may be safe and laudable. Whatsoever savours against the words of Christ, savours against the truth ; and as TertuUian says, "Whatever savours contrary to\truth is heresy, though it be an ancient custom." It is in the power of God to pardon those that err out of simplicity. " But because we erred once, we are not always to go on in our errors," as St. Cyprian admonishes well j ' "it being more proper for the wise, and those that fear God, to obey the manifest and open truth freely, and without delay, than obstinately and pertinaciously to resist it." Scotus having alleged the judgment of Alexander the Third, touching the baptizing^ of those of whom it was doubted whether they were baptized or no, takes an occasion to recommend three maxims." The first is, " Where there is a possibility, the safest way is to be chosen." Secondly, " Where there is no possibility, the next to the safest way is to be made choice of." Thirdly, "When impossibility ceases, everything is to be supplied which impossibility would not admit." These maxims, so agreeable to reason, whoever intends to follow will never question but that they ought to be baptized, if they have not received that baptism ordained by Christ, but only the rhantism, that is, the sprinkling substituted in its room by a vulgar use, or rather abuse, as Luther calls it. See chap. viii. 38. "Nor is it to be doubted," saith that famous divine, John Forbes,' "but that they are again to be baptized who before have only received a vain washing, and not the true sacrament of baptism. And though it be not so great as the papists imagine, yet is the necessity of this sacrament very great, and the profit and advantage very considerable." In the name of Jesus Christ. That is, professing a faith in Christ not feigned, as we may collect from chap. viii. 37. See our annotations upon the place. Or, in the name of Jesus Christ is the same with in Jesus Christ ; as St. Paul speaks, Rom. vi. 3 : Are ye ignorant that whosoever of us are baptized in Christ Jesus, accord- ing to the Greek, " into Christ Jesus," we are baptized in his death, the Greek has it, " into his death." Upon which words, Eulogius of Alexandria :* " To be baptized into Jesus Christ, signifies to be baptized according to the precept and tradition of Christ ; that is, ' Epist. ad Jubaian. ' 4 Sent. dist. iii. q. 4, num. 10. = Instruct. Hist, n. 10, cap. 14, n. 13. • Lib. ii. Coiitr. Novatian. apud Photium in Bibliotheea. VKR. XXXVIII.] LlTEllALLV EXPLAINED. 67 into the Father, and Son, and Holy Ghost. And that other, into his death, is typically representing his death in baptism." The same patriarch, in the same place, a little before, " What is said ia the Acts of those that had received the baptism of John, that they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus, denotes that they were baptized according to the institution and doctrine of the Lord Jesus : as also when it is said in another place, that they were baptized into Christ and the death of Christ, we ought to understand that the same sense is thereby signified ; that is to say, they were baptized into the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. For so the Lord Jesus Christ both taught and commanded his disciples to baptize." John Jewel, bishop of Salisbury :' " To baptize," saith he, " in the name of Christ, is so to baptize, as Christ instituted, commanded, and ordained. But those words, in the name of Christ, signify no more that baptism was administered in the only name of Christ, not of the Father and Holy Ghost, than these words,. Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, argue that he was a servant of Christ only, and not of the Father and Holy Ghost also : or as if those words which Paul spoke to the keeper of the prison, believe in Jesus Christ, should be thought to free him from a necessity of believing in the other two persons of the Trinity." Moreover, if there be any credit to be given to Pseudo-Abdias the Babylonian, the apostles in the Infancy of the church, when they baptized, used this form, "I baptize thee in the name of the Father, and of his Son Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost." Perhaps, to the intent, that the name of Jesus Christ, which was odious to the Jews and Gentiles, might be advanced into honour, in regard that the Holy Ghost was given in baptism upon the invocation of his name. " Peter," saith Cyprian,^ " makes mention of Jesus Christ, not as if the Father were to be omitted, but that the Son might be joined to the Father." Hence, St. Austin uses this example to weaken his adversaries' objection, where that Arian gainsays the Holy Ghost to be the Creator, because it is said all things were made by the Son :*^ "If," saith he, "because the Spirit is not named, therefore thou thinkest the Spirit of God not to be a crea- tor, by the same reason you may as well say, they were not bap- tized in his name, to whom St. Peter speaks. Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, because he does • Sect. 9. Confut. Harding. ' Epist. 73, ad Jubaian. ' Lib. ill Against Maximin, bishop of the Avians, cap. 17. F 2 68 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. II. not add, and of the Holy Ghost nor in the name of the Father, because he Is not there named. But if they were commanded to be baptized in the name of Christ, though the Father and the Holy Ghost were not mentioned, yet we understand that they were not otherwise baptized than in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost ; why, dost thou not apprehend, when it is said of the Son, all things were made hy him, that the Holy Ghost also, though not mentioned, is there likewise understood?" Thus St. Austin. "Cer- tainly," saith Facundus, bishop of Hermia,' " the apostles baptized In the name of Jesus, though not only of the Lord Jesus, that Is, in the name of the Son only, but also of the Father and Holy Ghost. And from hence, I gather, that when baptism was cele- brated, the very words' consecrated to the celebration of that ordinance were used. But In a relation it sufficed to mention only the name of the Lord Jesus to distinguish it from other divings. But, therefore, I believe that of all the three Persons," the name of Jesus Christ Is only assumed to denote the new baptism, because we are by baptism buried with him Into death. Yet would It not be, said, unless the Lord Jesus Christ were one of the Trinity." In remissio7i of your sins. That Is, to seal the remission of your sins, either received, or to be received by the full assurance of the conscience. Therefore, the most learned Ames :* " The remission of sins consists in the sentence of the offended God, nor can be attributed to any outward ceremony, unless it be as to a sign or a seal whereby that sentence of God is manifested to us." Says Bonaventure,^ "As the royal letters, sealed with the king's seal, are of high dignity, power, and value, and are said to do great things, yet there Is not In them any absolute force, but only an ordain- ment through the efficacy of the royal power ; the same thing Is to be understood of the sacraments. And thus speak the texts of the holy fathers according to common acceptation." And ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. That is, ye shall be Indued with the prophetic spirit, a specimen of which ye saw in the diversity of languages. " For," saith Calvin, " this place ought not to be understood of the grace of sanctification, which is gene- rally conferred upon all the godly.'" According "to the usual Hebrew phrase, the Prophetic Spirit is called the Holy Spirit, which by their own confession failed among the Jews after the second year • Lib. i. To JuBtin the Emp, cap. 3. ^ Bellarmin. Enervat. torn. iii. cap. 3. ' 4 D. I. Art.i. Q. 4. VEIL XLI.j LITEEALLY EXPLAINED. 69 of Darius the son of Hystaspes, but was in a more ample measure restored by Jesus Christ, according to the prophecy of Joel. 39. To you, &c. As if he had said, For you who believe the gospel preached by me, together with your posterity that shall believe, and all that shall obey the call of God, are comprehended in the number, to whom belongs the abovementioned promise by the mouth of Joel. Who are far off. That is, aliens from the commonwealth of Israel. Peter, most skilful in the scriptures and now enlightened by the Holy Ghost, knew very well that the call of the Gentiles was to be ; yea, he had learned it also from Christ, Matt, xxviii. 19; Acts i. 8. But at what time, and under what conditions, he was ignorant. Therefore, below, ch. xi., when the Gentiles were not yet called, he shunned their converse as polluted ; but having known the will of God, that they were to be called without the observation of the Mosaical law, he presently made it his business to go amongst them. Even as many as the Lord our Ood shall call. That is, whoever shall obey the voice of God calling to them. " For," saith Grotius, " in words that signify a benefit, the acceptation of the benefit ia frequently understood. Thus the appellation of called is taken, 1 Cor. i. 24 ; Jude 1. Thus the word, to be revealed, is taken, Isa. xxxiii. 1. Thus God is said to give repentance, 2 Tim. ii. 25. To give bread from heaven, John vi. 32. To give a heart, Deut. xxix. 4; and elsewhere, many others of the same kind." See our annota- tiens on Joel ii. 32, upon the words, Whom the Lord shall call. 40. And with many other words, &c. As much as to say, And he was urgent, and pressed them with exhortations, followed them close, persuaded, and earnestly entreated them to separate them- selves from the rest of the Jews that were unwilling to believe in Christ, and contumaciously refused the divine grace that was offered them, to prevent their being involved with them in the same destruction. 41. They then who gladly received his words were baptized, Wa- lafridus Strabo, who in the ninth century was abbot of Augia the Eich, in the diocese of Constance, in his work Of the beginning and increase of ecclesiastical things, ch. xxvi. : " You might ob- serve," saith he, "that in the primitive times, the ordinance of baptism was only administered to those, who through perfection of body and mind had attained to this : that they knew and under- 70 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. II. stood what profit they received by baptism, what was to be pro- fessed, what to be believed, and lastly, what was reserved for those that were born again in Christ." Amba Macaire, bishop of Memphis, who was secretary to Cosmus, the third of that name, patriarch of the Cophti, or Christians of Egypt, and lived in the eighth century, says, as Father Vansleb reports in his History of the Church of Alexandria, ch. 23, that in the primitive times, baptism was not administered in the church of Alexandria but once a year, and that was upon Good Friday, and only to those of thirty years of age. Curcellaeus, our countryman,^ " Baptism of infants," saith he, " in the two first centuries after Christ was altogether unknown, but in the third and fourth was allowed by some few ; in the fifth and following ages it was generally received into custom." See our annotations upon ch. viii. 37. But from thence, that the Jews who were circumcised in their infancy, before circumcision was abrogated, were here baptized by the order of Peter, it appears, that by bap- tism and circumcision two covenants altogether differing, were to be sealed ; of which the one was with those who by the law of nature were born of the seed of Abraham ; the other with those who by the gift of faith, like Abraham, were spiritually re-born, as that great divine, eminent for all manner of learning, Nehe- miah Cox, by most weighty and solid arguments has demonstrated in his excellent discourse of the covenants that God made with men before the law. Were added. That is, to the body of the church, which then consisted of a hundred and twenty disciples. Souls. That is. Persons, which in other places we are wont to call " heads," by synecdoche of the member. About three thousand. There is no wonder to be made, that three thousand persons should be plunged in one day by Peter, a fisherman, and used to the water, in regard that in the beginning of the fourth century, Gregory, the first bishop" of the Armenians, baptized in one day, by immersion, no less than twelve thousand, as we read in his authentic life, and which also Isaac, patriarch of the same nation, confirms in his first invective. St. Bucherius i^ " The Lord," saith he, " calls fishers to the apostleship, because such were of necessary use, who being accustomed to the water, were skilled both in fishing and diving ; therefore he did not ' Iristitut. Relig. Chiietian. Lib; i. cap. 12. ^ Serm. in Die Sancti. Andrese. apud Novarin. VJiR. XLII.] UTiSHALLY EXPLAINED, 71 ordain them to change their art, but only made them fishers of a far nobler degree." That person, famous for his most exquisite learning, both divine and human, James Benignus Bossuet, for- merly bishop of Condon, tutor to the most serene dauphin, and now prime almoner to his most serene consort, and bishop of Meaux, speaking of the three thousand baptized by Peter :' " The great number of converts," saith he, " is no argument that he ' baptized them by aspersion, as some conjecture ; for besides that there is no obligation upon us to believe that he baptized them all in one day, certain it is that St. John the Baptist, who baptized no less, baptized by immersion: and his example gives us to understand, that for the administration of baptism to a great mul- titude, they chose those places which were well stored with water ; besides that the baths and purifications of the ancients, principally of the Jews, rendered that ceremony easy and familiar at that time. In short, we do not find in scripture that any were other- wise baptized than by immersion, and we are able to make out by the acts of the councils, and by the ancient rituals, that for 1300 years together they baptized in that manner throughout all the churches, as much as was possible for them so to do." 42. And they persevered, &c. That is, and they continued assi- duously and diligently. In the doctrine of the apostles, That is, in hearing the apostles' teaching. And in communication of breaking bread, and in prayers. In the Greek, " And in communication, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers ;" which the learned divine, Joseph Mede, renders : "And in communication, that is, in breaking bread and in prayers." So that the conjunction and after communication, is not conjunctive, but explanatory, as frequently in other places. Hence the Syriac translates the words, "And they did conununicate in prayer, and in breaking the eucharist." The service of the ancient Christians, baptized according to the precept of Christ, consisted of these three parts ; hearing the word, public prayers, under which was, by a kind of synecdoche, comprehended thanksgiving, ch. iii. 1 ; xvi. 13 ; Luke xviii. 10, 11; Phil. i. .3, 4 ; and celebration of the Lord's supper. " Breaking of bread," saith the famous Lightfoot, " among the Jews signifies that particular action, with which dinner or sup- per began ; but I do not remember that ever I observed it applied ' In tractat. de Commun. sub binis spedebus. 72 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. II. by the Talmudlsts to the whole meal. And I suspect that what Beza affirms, is rather upon trust than upon proof: 'It came in custom,' says he, 'that their mutual ordinary food, even their feasts, which they often made together, were understood under the name of breaking of bread ;' which if true, I must ingenuously acknowlege my own ignorance; but if not true, then breaking of bread, both in this and the following 46th verse, cannot be under- stood of ordinary food, but of the eucharist, which the Syriac in- terpreter expresses in terms ; and the parallel is that of ch. xx. 7 ; 1 Cor. X. 16." But there is a synecdoche of the member in this phrase, for a part of the Lord's supper is set down for the whole, as the drinking of the cup, 1 Cor. xii. 13. But the breaking of bread represents the bitter pains which Christ suffered upon the- cross, wherewith his body was as it were broken and bruised, for such torments in scripture are called breakings or fractures, Prov. vi. 15 ; Isa. xxx. 26 ; xxxviii. 13 ; Dan. xi. 26, &c. Whence we collect, that the ceremony of breaking the bread in the Lord's supper is not a thing indifferent; but whereas it tends to set forth the end of the Lord's supper, it is altogether to be used according to the example of Christ and his apostles. See Matt. xxvi. 26 ; 1 Cor. x. 19 ; xi. 24. . The English translation is less approved by the learned Mede, who refers the Greek, word koivid- vla, to the preceding word aTroCTroXwv, and translates it, "The fellowship of the apostles." 43. A)id fear, &c. As if he had said. They that were not yet converted by the preaching of the apostles stood amazed and astonished at the novelty of the growing church, and the many signs and wonders wherewith the apostles corroborated the force and energy of their sermons. 44. Jnd all, &c As much as to say, But all the believers joined together in brotherly love, and converted their estates which they had in propriety to the common good of all. 45. Possessions, &c. That is. The rich sold what they had, to supply the necessities of the poor. " They were Jews that did so, and none but Jews that did so. Show me the like among the Gren- tiles when the gospelcame among them. Which of all St. Paul's Epistles gave any such precept, or intimates any such thing ? But as for the Jews, they who once believed in Christ, believed also the woeful destruction of their own nation to be within a few years after, and therefore they thought good, while there was yet VEtt. XLVI.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 73 time, to improve their lands and possessions to the best use, which they should not many years enjoy. And the occasion was now fit, at the first preaching of the gospel and gathering up a church to Christ, to furnish the apostles and others for this service and employment. And therefore, when the gospel Avas also spread among the Gentiles, the apostles were so careful to make collec- tions in the churches for the relief of the poor saints in Jerusalem, even those who at the first had disfurnished themselves of all, and at whose charge, as may be supposed, the gospel was at the begin- ning preached among the Gentiles." Thus, the most learned Joseph Mede.' See Rom. xv. 26, 27 ; 1 Cor. xvi. 1 ; 2 Cor. viii. 9. 46. Continuing daily with one accord in the temple. That is, they met daily in the temple, with a brotherly unanimity, to worship God in public. And breaking bread from house to house. The Greek hath katoikon, which the Syriac and Arabic interpreters take to be opposed to the temple, as if it were singly said, " at home, or in private," whereas by others it is expounded "at several houses," that is, sometimes at one house, and sometimes at another. Sal- masius says, "That the ordinance of the Lord's supper was celebrated in the private houses, where they feasted together. Katoikon is from one house to another, as katapolin is from town to town. For the Jews eat their legal passover every one in his own house, in imitation of which Christ instituted his ordinance, and ordered it to be eaten at the same hour of supper. Those suppers, as is well known, were called agapes, 'love-feasts,' whether celebrated in the church, or in the houses of private persons. In both places they were partakers of the sacrament of Christ's body and blood, after they had supped. Hence agape, ' love-feast,' is taken for the eucharist itself by an ancient author, who calls himself falsely Ignatius, in an Epistle to the Smymeans. 'It is not lawful without the bishop to baptize, or celebrate the love- feast,' says he; that is, the Lord's supper. To celebrate private love-feasts, the richer sort invited the brethren to their houses, and then according to custom celebrated the Lord's supper after the end of the love-feast. From which love-feasts, the custom continued a long time of blessing and receiving the eucharist from house to house. In the fourth century it appears to have been •I 1 Serm. 28, upon Prov, xxx.'8, 9. 74 THE ACTS OP THE HOI.Y AVOSTLES [cHAP. II. still administered by several bishops and presbyters in private houses. Which by their last canon, save one, was prohibited by the fathers of the Council of Laodicea, ordaining that no oblations should be celebrated in private houses. This was in the year 364. But the fathers of the Synod of Gangra, which was some twenty years before that of Laodicea, condemned Eustathius, because he would not allow the private love-feasts' of that sort, at which, without doubt, they received also the sacrament. 'If any one,' say they, canon ix., 'despises these cordial entertainers of the poor at their love-feasts, who out of respect invited the brethren to their houses, and refuses out of contempt to be partakers of such biddings to supper, let him be an anathema.' For it is to those private love-feasts that the canon of the Laodicean council without question has reference, forbidding oblations In private houses. For In those love-feasts, which were only entertainments of private persons, inviting the faithful brethren to their houses, was also celebrated the oblation, that Is, the eucharist. For with the brethren, they invited also the bishops or elders, by whom, according to the custom of that time, the bread and wine was blessed into the sacrament of the body and blood of Christ. Nevertheless the Laodicean canon did not take away the private love-feasts, but only the custom of communicating the Lord's supper therein. For in the 28th canon of the same synod, the clergy and laity invited to the love-feasts are forbid to take any parts of the victuals; that Is to say, according to the Greek way of speaking, to carry any part home to their own houses. So they were not forbid to go to the love-feasts, but to carry any part away. By the same council the people were restrained from celebrating their love-feasts in the temples, in which public love- feasts most certain It is that the eucharist was wont to be taken." These love-feasts seem to have their original from the sacred feasts of the Jews, Neh. viii. 10 — 12. Did eat their meat with gladness, and singleness of heart. That is, cheerfully and temperately; to refresh, and not oppress nature. See TertuUian, Apologet. cap. 39. Some there are who, with Chrysostom, believe that the love-feasts were wont to follow the celebration of the Lord's supper; whereas, on the contrary. It is apparent that the sacrament of the Lord's death concluded the supper, by the custom, which remained in Africa, upon the anniversary night of the Lord's supper : as appears by the Councils VER. XLVII.J LITEllAIXy EXPLAINED. 75 of Carthage, 3 Can. 29, 6 Can. 9, and by the Epistle of St. Austin to Januarins, cap. 9. 47. Having favour with all the people. That is, they were grateful and acceptable to the very strangers, who convinced by the splendour of the virtues which they beheld in them, applauded those things which they could not yet imitate. And the Lord added such as should be saved. That is, such as had separated themselves from the common impiety of men. Daily. As much as to say, the multitude of those daily increased who had freed themselves from the snares of impiety, and joined themselves to the church of Christ. CHAPTEK III. 1. But Peter. In the Greek, " at the same time Peter," or as others render it, " but as soon as Peter." At the ninth hour of prayer. That is with us, about three of the clock in the afternoon ; which as it was the ordinary hour of sacrificing, so was it also of prayer. As to the times of sacrificing, thus Josephus:* "Twice every day, to wit. In the morning and about the ninth hour, the priests sacrificed upon the altar." As to the hours of prayer, thus Drusius : " The ancient custom was to pray thrice a day. Evening, morning, and at noon mil I pray and cry aloud, Ps. Iv. 17. "Which hours they reckon to be the third, sixth, ninth. The third answers our nine in the morning, the sixth our twelve at noon, and the ninth our three in the after- noon." And that there were no more than three hours of prayer- time among the Jews, Kimchi clearly demonstrates upon Ps. xxxiii. 8, which also Daniel seems to confirm, who was wont to pray thrice a day, Dan. vi. 10. E. Menachem adds also, that the third hour was set apart by Abraham, the sixth by Isaac, and the ninth by Jacob. Nor shall you find any other distinctioris of hours, wherein the scripture makes mention of set prayers. In the third hour the Holy Ghost descended upon the disciples of Christ, ch. ii. ver. 15. In the sixth hour Peter ascended into the upper room to prayer, ch. x. ver. 9, and at the ninth hour Peter • 14 Antiq. 8. 76 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CUAP. III. and John went to the temple. Whence Tertullian notably infers,^ "That saving always that there is no time limited, but that Christians are at liberty to pray everywhere, and at all times, yet that those hours, as they . were the most remarkable in human affairs, dividing the day, distinguishing business, and made known by public sound, so were they the more solemn for the celebration of divine worship." 2. At the gate of the temple which is called Beautiful. This was in the first circuit of the temple, called the court of the Gentiles, which Herod added to the rest. It was overlaid with Corinthian brass, which was much more shining and beautiful than gold.*' 4. Look on us. By which words Peter gives to understand that he was to expect the benefit as well from John, as from him. Hence the lame person is said in the next verse to have given special heed to them, as expecting to receive something from them both. And so the miracle of the cure was by both equally accom- plished, though Peter only spake. 6. Silver and gold have I none. That is, I have no money at all. But what I have. That is to say, sound and perfect health. In the name of Jesus Christ. That is, by the virtue and power of Jesus Christ. This form was used in miraculous cures, and casting out of devils, Mark ix. 28. 7. The bases lal jSoffsie] received strength. That is, the soles of his feet, which the Latins call vestigia, as well as the footsteps, or prints of the feet. 8. And leaping up, he stood. It refers to the prophecy of Isaiah, ch. XXXV. ver. 6, Then shall the lame leap, as an hart; that is, with an extraordinary nimbleness. Walking and leaping. He could not compose himself to an ordinary pace through the excess of his joy. Thus speaks a classical author,^ "Rejoicing, and full of gladness, he expressed his joy by jumping." 10. Were filled with wonder and amazement. This would Virgil express thus : " With minds astonished, fixed they stood." 11. But when they saw. In the Greek and English version. But when the lame person that was healed held Peter and John. " Thus," saith Beza, "it runs in all the Greek copies that we have seen, as also in CEcumenius. But the exemplars of the old edition are here erroneous in two manner of readings. For some write, ' but > Lib. de Jejun, = Joseph, de Bell. Jud. lib. vi. cap. 6. = Apiileius, lib. x. VER. XI. j » LITEEALLY EXPLAINED. 77 when they saw.' Others, ' but when they held ;' arid these words, ' the lame man being healed,' are all left out, both by them and by the Syriac and Arabic interpreters. But the Greek word kratein, here does not signify to take hold of, but so to hold a thing fast as not to let it escape out of the hand. Which argues that the lame person was loth to depart from them, either out of affection to those that had cured him, or out of fear of becoming lame again, if he should forsake their company." Thus Servius observes that Virgil makes use of the Latin tenere, for "to stay" and "embrace." To the porch which is called Solomon's. So the first court of the temple was called, which was also the court of the Gentiles, in regard the Gentiles had liberty of entrance into it. It was called Solomon's Porch, because there was in that court the repaired porch toward the east part of the temple, which, though never finished and made perfect, bare Solomon's name. Of which Jose- phua,' "That porch belonged to the outward temple, hanging over a steep valley, supported with four hundred cubits of wall, built of very white four-square stones. The length of every stone was twenty cubits, and the depth six : the work of King Solomon, who first built the whole temple." Upon which place of Josephus, the learned Lightfoot makes this observation in his chorographic dis- quisition before St. John. " There is no need of a commentary upon these words. The eastern porch was of the first foundation by Solomon. He speaks plainly enough which, and where the porch of Solomon was; that is, upon the out-wall of the temple toward the east. But the royal p^rch stood upon the south wall:" which received its royal name from King Herod, as Lightfoot. upon the same place a little before observes. The same famous author, in his Hebraic Hours upon the Acts of the Apostles,' « If you distinguish between porch and porch, Solomon's was the eastern, and the Toyal the southern porch. But if you would have the whole court to be comprehended under the name of Solomon's porch, though it seems s6mewhat more obscure why it should be called a porch, and why Solomon's, yet may it not be Incongruously here admitted. But -whether it take its name from Solomon's porch, strictly so called, as being the most noble because anciently built by Solomon, or whether because Solomon consecrated that court in his temple by sacrifices, 1 Kings viii. 63, or whether because Solomon filled up immense valleys to make a ' Antiq. 20,8. " Chap. iii. ver. U, ' 78 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSl'LES [CHAP. III. space even for this court? — whatever be the reason, we do not deny but this whole court may be called by that name, though as we have elsewhere showed, the porch itself, in a strict sense, was only a part, and the eastern porch of that court." 12. As though by our virtue. That is, as though by any wonder- working efficacy, or virtue inherent, or inbred in us. Or power. In the Greek and English version, holiness. That is, or by any faculty divinely ingrafted in us, for our piety toward God. We had made this man to walk. That is, we had been the cause that this lame person, by a supernatural effect, should walk upon his feet. 13. The God of our fathers. From whom proceeded the true and heaven-born religion. Has glorified his Son. That is, in the miracle by us wrought, has been pleased to illustrate the glory of Jesus, who is the Messiah promised in the law and the prophets. " This surname," saith Grotius, upon Matt. xiv. 33, " the Son of God, appears com- monly given to the Messiah. For, says Nathaniel, Master, thou art that Son of God, thou art that King of Israel, John i. 50. That is to say, from the second Psalm, which the ailcient Hebrews interpret according to the mystical meaning of the Messiah. Therefore where Christ is by Peter said to be the Son of the living God, Mark and Luke content themselves with the word Christ alone. Add to these Matt. xxvi. 63 ; Heb. v. 4, 5. But how God the Father called Christ his beloved Son, see our literal explanation upon Matt. iii. 17. Whom. That is, the Messiah promised to you by God, and so openly professing himself to be, Mark xiv. 62. You delivered up. To be put to death by Pilate. This properly belongs to the Jewish senate. See Mark xv. 1 ; John xviii. 30. And denied in the presence of Pilate. This relates to the people of the Jews. As much as to say. You would not acknowledge him before Pilate to be the Kihg Messiah. He determining to let him go. That is, though Pilate himself, a Gentile, and an unjust magistrate, adjudged him innocent, and so fit to be acquitted, and dismissed. 14. But you. Born and bred in the true worship of God, to whom this Jesus, who is the promised King Messiah, was sent. Denied the Holy One. That is, you abjured him who is the VEU. XV.J LITEllALLY EXPLAINED. 79 Holy of Holies, and our just Lord, or our Justice, Dan. ix. 24 ; Jer. xxiii. 6. And you required a murderer to be granted unto you. That is, when it was in your power and choice whether you would have released this Jesus, a person of absolute innocence and integrity, or Barabbas convicted of manifest murder, you required that homicide to be dismissed in your favour. .15. But you killed the Author of life. That is, by your urgent instigation, you compelled Pilate to condemn the Prince of Life to death. The Greek word, as Erasmus observes, consists of words contrary to themselves, being compounded of one word signifying beginning, and another word derived from the end, as much as to say, beginner and ender: therefore Christ is said to be the Beginner and Ender of eternal life. For as the learned John Davenant, bishop of Salisbury, observes upon Col. iii. 4, " He promised us this life, he merited it, he prepared it, he will grant it. He promised in the name of the Father, Fear not, little flock, for it has pleased the Father to give you the hingdom, Luke xii. 32 ; and in his own name, / give eternal life to them, John x. 28. He merited it. God hath sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him, 1 John iv. 9, and v. 11. He hath pre- pared us for this, and this life for us. He hath prepared and fitted us for this life by his Spirit. He hath made us meet to be partakers of the lot of the saints in light, Col. i. 12. He hath enlivened us by Christ, through whose grace ye are saved, Eph. ii. 5. He hath also prepared this kingdom for us by his ascension. / go to pfepare a place for you, and when I have prepared it, I will come again and take you with me, &c., John xiv. 20. Lastly, He will grant to his own this crown of eternal life. Thou hast given him power over all flesh, that to as many as thou hast given him, he should give to them eternal life, John xvii. 2. There is laid up for me a crown of justice, which the Lord will give me, 2 Tim. iv. 8. Christ is therefore truly called our Life, that is the Author or Cause of our life eternal. And being consecrated, he is made the Author of eternallife to all that obey him, Heb. v. 9." You hilled. Every one is reputed to have done that what another does in his favour. Wliom God raised from the dead. See annot. on ch. ii. 24. Whereof we are witnesses. When Peter called himself and his fellow disciples the witnesses of Christ's being raised from the 80 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. III. dead, it signifies that with their own eyes they saw Christ when he was risen. 16. And through faith, &c. As much as to say, and through a firm persuasion of the divine power of Jesus, this man whom we see, and knew to have been lame from his mother's womb, now upward of forty years of age, has obtai^ed from Christ the sound- ness of his soles and ankles. Has made this man strong. By the consolidatian of his feet and anklebones. Look back to ver. 7. His name. That is, the efiective power of Christ. "Name," saith Grotius, " is here taken for virtue and power," And faith, &c. As if he bad said, by his firm persuasion of the divine power of Christ, which through Christ arises to that God of whom you profess yourselves the adorers, this perfect soundness is conferred upon him from above, before you all. "When he says, faith which is by him, by that word he means, that our faith no otherwise ascends to God, but as it is founded in Christ. Therefore then our faith looks to Christ, and relies upon him," saith Calvin. See 1 Pet. i. 21. 17. Through ignorance ye did it. That is, more through a dull and supine ignorance of the person, than any designed malice, you and the senators of your great Sanhedrim wrested from Pilate that unjust sentence, whereby he judged Christ, the Son of the living God, to the torment of the cross. However, this ignorance does not excuse your sin, but abates something of the heinousness of it, and renders it the more easy to be pardoned by God. Hence Christ doing that upon the cross which intercessors use to do, omitting what was to be blamed in the fact of the Jews, applies himself to that which in some measure tended to lessen the offence. Father, says he, forgive them, for they know not what they do, Luke xxiii. 34. 18. God, &c. As if he had said, but God, who wisely disposes all things by counsel and reason, by means of your dull and sottish ignorance brought that to pass which he knowingly and willingly had decreed and foretold by his prophets, that Christ should suffer to expiate the sins of mankind. Saith Tertullian,i " The scrip- tures declaring that Christ could suffer death, at the same time affirm that he could be unknown. For unless he had been unknown, he could not have suffered." ' Lib. iii, against Marcion. VEH, XX.J LITEHALLY EXPl.AINKD. 81 19. Repent therefore. As much as to say, therefore let your repentance be great, in regard ye have offended God. " Repent of your errors, having found the truth. Repent of your affection to those things which God loves not," as Tertullian speaks.' And be converted^ He that repenteth hath no better refuge than the utter change of his purpose. " True repentance is to commit nothing to be repented of, and to be sorry for it when any such thing hath been committed. This is the satisfaotion of repentance, to root out the causes of sins, and to give no ehtrance to their suggestions," saith Gentiadius of Marseilles, in his book of Ecclesiastical Dogmas, cap. iv. See my annotations upon Joel ii. 12; Matt. iii. 8. Tliat your sins- may be blotted out. Not that our repentance or works merit anything at the hands of God, or are so perfect that they can abide the test of his rigorous justice, but because that G-dd under this condition has decreed to make us partakers of salvation purchased by the blood of Christ. " Therefore let the wicked man relinquish his ways, let him relinquish his evil thoughts, which cause him to despair of remission of sins, and according to the saying of the prophet. Let him be converted to the Lord, for he will abundantly pardon, Isa. Iv. 7. For there is nothing wanting in Him, whose mercy is omnipotent, and whofee omnipotency is altogether merciful. And so great is the benignity of his omnipotency and the omnipotency of his benignity, that there is nothing which he will not, or cannot remit to a true penitent," saith Fulgentius.*^ The same author in the same place, a little further: " For such is the justice of God, that he condemns the perverse, and saves the converted. Whence, saith he, be con- verted to me, and I will save you, Isa. xlv. 22." But yet for no other cause is God moved to pardon the converted, but out of his mere free love which he bears to mankind. And this love, which was as it were extinguished by their sins, is again rekindled by the intercession and obedience of the Son of Gbd, "who remaining still just, was made mortal. By taking upon him the punishment and not the guilt, he cancelled both the guilt and the punishment," saith St. Austin.^ 20. That when the times of refreshing shall come. In the Greek, " That the times of refrigeration may cOme. It is usual to the Greeks to make use of otriDg av with their aorists, for the simple ' De Pcenitcnt. cap. 4. ' Epiet. 7, to Venantia. ' Serm. 37, De Verb. Dom. G 82 THE ACTS 01' THE HOLY APOSTLES [OHAP. HI- particle ut, "that," as you may see below, ch. xv. 17; Matt. vi. 5; Luke iii. 35. Hence the Syriac and Arabic interpreters under- standing that the Greek Sttwc av joined only in this text -the second proposition with the first, they have translated it by the copulative, " and," thus, " And the times may come that ye may have rest from the sight of God, and he may send to you Jesus Christ, who was prepared for you." The sense'is, That your sins registered in the memory of God being utterly defaced, the day. of refrigeration, that is, of consolation, may shine upon you. As he is said to burn with grief, who is afflicted with a sharp sense of pain, so is he said to be refrigerated when consolation alleviates his torment. The Ethiopic version explains, the "times of refrigeration" by the "times of mercy." The most learned and modest Lightfoot;i "I might perhaps," saith he, "betray my ignorance in the Greek language, if I should acknowledge that I do not understand by what authority of that tongue, the most learned interpreters have rendered the words, either, ' that when they shall come,' as the vulgar Latin, Erasmus, and the interlineary ; or, ' when they shall come,' as the English, French, and Italian ; or, ' after that they shall come,' as Beza. But I am not ashamed to confess I understand not, since it agrees with the idiom, why they do not render, 'that they may come.' Thus oTTwc a.v, is taken simply for ut, 'that,' Ps. ix. 15, xcii. 8, cxix. 101. And thus it runs here, 'Eepent ye, therefore, and be con- verted, that your sins may be blotted out, and that the times of refreshment may come, and God may send you Jesus Christ.'" Thus far Lightfoot. From the presence of the Lord. That is, with the propitious favour of God. The famous Knatchbull renders it, " From the anger of the Lord." And so refrigeration from the presence of God seems to be the same as a flight from his wrath to come, Matt. iii. 7. See our annotations upon the place. And he shall send. The construction requires that, with the most learned Ludovicus de Dieu, Heinsius, and Lightfoot, after the Syriac and Arabic interpreters, we render the Greek aorist in this place by the present tense, " may send.'' That is, may reveal by the comfortable preaching of the gospel, than which nothing can be more pleasing and grateful to afflicted and- trembling con- sciences. "What," saith Lightfoot, in the place forementioned, * In his Hebraic Hours upon this verse. VER. XX. j LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 83 "can be more fully and plainly said, if our interpretation be admitted, to answer the conceptions of the auditors, had they objected against those things which Peter said; is it so? Is Jesus, whom we crucified, the true Messiah ? Then all hopes . of refrigeration by the Messiah are vanished, since the Messiah himself is vanished and gone ; there is an end of the expectation of Israel's comfort, if there be an end of him that should be the Comforter. Not so, says Peter, for the Messiah and comfort shall be restored to you upon your repentance, yet so that the Messiah is still to remain in heaven. He shall be sent to you in his com- forting and refreshing word, and in his graces and benefits, if ye repent. The parallel is that of Acts xiii. 47, We turn to the Gentiles. For so has the Lord commanded, saying, I have appointed thee to he a light to the Gentiles. I have appointed thee ; whom ? Paul or Barnabas ? No, but thee, Christ ; sent and shining in the doctrine of Paul and Barnabas. So ch. xxvi. 23 : Christ risen, from the dead is said, to show light unto the people and to the Gentiles." So Ephes. ii. 17. It is said of Christ, after he had suffered the death of the cross for mankind, that he came and preached peace to those that were afar off, that is, to the Gentiles ; and to them that were nigh, that is, to the Jews. Who was preached unto you. In the Greek and English, Who was before -preached unto you, St. Chrysostom reads it, " Who was before ordained," as the ancient Greek copies, which Beza says he has read; which the Arabic and Syriac interpreters seem to have followed, while they turn the words, "who was prepared;" and Tertullian rendering it, " who was pre-designed." The Ethiopia seems to have read, it otherwise in his Greek copy, seeing that he renders it, " AVTio was fore-anointed." But the first and vulgar lection is to be preferred. He who was before preached. " For," saith Lightfoot, in his Hebraic Hours upon this place, "the discourse and meaning of Peter relates to preaching ; for he shall send you Christ by preaching, as he was preached before. Now, you are to understand that the apostle in this discourse speaks of a threefold time. 1. Before the coming of Christ he was promulr gated by Moses, and by all the prophets from Samuel. 2. When he came, at what time God showed him to the world, raising him up a Saviour, then he sent him to you, ver. 26, first of all, by his doctrine to convert you from your iniquities. 3. When he as- cended into heaven there to remain ; yet then he shall send him G 2 84 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. IH. to you again upon repentance, by the preaching of his word, as before he was made known by preaching. Jesus Christ. That is, Jesus, who is the Messiah or Christ promised in the law and the prophets, for the redemption and con- solation of Israel. 21. Whom the heaven must receive. These words carry an ambiguous sense if you look upon the grammatical construction ; and may signify as well that heaven is received by Jesus, as that Jesus is received into heaven. But when you consider the meaning of the speaker and the context of the words, it is not probable they should admit of the first exposition. For Peter, speaking of the Jews, by whose importunity Christ was put to death, dissuades them from expecting his corporal presence upon earth. Who, as the same Peter says, 1 Epist. iii. 22, is gone into heaven, and sits at the right hand of God, and whom the heaven must receive, not as a prison, but his own most glorious palace and mansion, more befitting his divine majesty than the earth, wherein he lived during the time of his mortality. Now, by heaven is meant, not that part of the sky which is visible to our &ight, but the third heaven. Paradise, the seat and habitation of God, that inaccessible light which God inhabits. For Christ ascended ■ above all the visible heavens, Ephes. iv. 10, and sits at the right hand of the majesty of God in the highest altitudes, to prepare a place for us in the house of his Father, John xiv. 2. Until the times of restitution. According to the Greek as Hesycliius interprets it, " until the times of a full finishing or achieving." TertuUian translates it, '-'until the times of exhi- bition ;" and thus he cites this place, " Until the times of the exhi- bition or settilig forth of all things, which God spake by the mouths of his holy prophets." ' . In like manner CEcumenius ex- plains it, " till all things be finished or performed." Lightfoot also admirably expresses the sense of this verse in these words : '' "Jesus, the heavens both contain and shall contain as to his person, till all these things be brought to pass or effect. There- fore do not continue in the error of the generality of our erring people, to expect his personal presence upon earth." Hence, it is apparent that Peter meant the time that Jesus should abide in heaven, according to what' he with the rest of the apostles had heard from the angels before, ch. i. 11. As if he had said, Christ ' Lib. de Resiir. Carnif. » Heb. Horis, upon Matt. xvii. 1 1", VER. XXll.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 85 being gone into heaven, shall there remain till all the predictions of the prophets shall be fulfilled; and those being fulfilled, he shall return from heaven to earth to judge the quick and the dead. Since the world began. That is, of old, of ancient times, lea. Ixiv. 4; Jer. ii. 20. 22. For Moses, &c. Although this place in the first and more gross sense may be understood from Deut. xviij. 15 of any prophet endued with foreknowledge, whom God should raise up at any time, after Moses, among the people, to the end they might obey him, as speaking by a divine inspiration, so he did not seduce them from the worship of the true God, and from true piety ; yet, in the more exquisite and mystical sense, it contains the pro- phecy of Christ, the Head and Chief of all the prophets, to whom all the rest were but forerunners ; and than whom there was none more glorified, by those .signs -by which God was pleased to have his prophets distinguished. Which mystical sense of this place, in the time of Christ and his disciples, was also admitted by the Jews, as appears by this text, and below, ch. vii. 34, and by many places of the gospel, and particularly by the words of the Sama- ritan, and those other of the people who were about to crown Christ, John iv. 25, vi. 14, This is really that prophet that should come into the world. For the Messiah was properly understood by him that should come, Luke vii. 19. A Prophet. That is, one who shall proclaim to men the will of God, as yet concealed in mystery.. - Shall the Lord your God raise. That is, shall the Lord your God give, present, send. Of your brethren. As much to say, Not a stranger, but one of your own nation, born of the posterity of Israel, and your relation by the tie of blood and kindred. Like unto me. So the Jews, comparing the Messiah with Moses, speak in these words, ■ " As the first Redeemer, so shall be the last Redeemer." But Christ was not only like to Moses for the wisdom of his doctrine and the greatness of his miracles, but he exceeded him also in honour and glory. Him shall ye hear. That is, ye shall believe in all his promises, and obey all his commandments. Therefore are none of the sayings of Christ to be called in question, nothing to be omitted which he commanded, nor anything to be altered at men's pleasure. ' Midraich Koheleth, ad cap. i. v. 9. See Eusebius, Demoii!.t. Evang. lib. iii. ; 86 THE ACTS OF THB HOLY APOSTLES [OHAP. III. Now, since there is no place in the law that more manifestly points at Christ, I believe that Christ refers to it, when he says. Who believes in me, as the scripture has said, John vii. 38. This, the Father, with a heavenly voice, declared openly of Christ, and commanded all to hear him^ Matt. xvii. 5. Admirably, therefore, Grotius upon that place of Matthew : " Those things which follow in Moses are to be observed, as if it had been said, You have yourselves desired of God not to act among you by signs of terror ; God consents to your petition; and therefore the Word is made flesh. He made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant. Behold him who, while he excels Elias in vehement zeal toward the house of God, at the same time exceeds Moses in meekness. Neither thunders, nor clouds, nor fires from heaven bear witness of him; but the cheering light and affable voice of the Father." 23. Every soul. That is, whoever shall refuse to hear Christ, who is confessed and manifestly appears to be recommended by Moses as the chieftain of all the prophets, Deut. xviii. 15, 19. Shall be destroyed [from among the people. He does not deserve to be numbered among the people of God who refuses Christ for his master, by whom alone GoH instructs us ; so that he cuts hinl- self off from the body of the church who refuses to submit to the head of it. And, indeed, eternal destruction is prepared for all those that will not obey Christ, as the apostle witnesses, 2 Thess. i, 8, 9. 24. And all the prophets, &c. As if he had said. And all the rest of the prophets after Moses, in a long succession of time from Samuel who led their sacred chorus ; therefore the Jerusalem Tal- mud^ calls Samuel, " The master of the prophets." Have spoken and proclaimed. In Greek and English, "foretold," or " declared before." Of those days. Wherein God has chosen to procure the salva- tion of his people "^by the Christ whom we preach. But how or in what manner Samuel nominally foretold of Christ, does not appear in scripture, unless we refer hither what we read about the anointment of David, who was to be a type of the future Mes- siah when he was elected king of the Israelites by the divine choice of God, 1 Sam. xvi. 8, 13. But frequently the prophets that lived after Samuel among the Israelites prophesy concerning Christ. ' Hagigah, fol. 77, 1. VEIL XXVlJ L1TEIIALI,Y EXPLAINED. 87^ Among the rest, most remarkable is that of the prophecy of Nathan, 2 Sam. vii. 12, &c., not to mention those that are frequent in the Psalms, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and other writings of the prophets. 25. Ye are the children, &c. As if he had said, Ye are those to whom belong the oracles of the prophets, and the covenant made with the ancient progenitors of the Hebrews, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, Gen. xxii. 18 ; xxvi. 4; xxviii. 14 ; according to the Hebrew phrase, whereby to be said the son of any thing, signifies the same thing as to belong unto, or to be partaker of. Hence Matt. ix. 15, The sons of the bridegroom, or of the nuptial chamber, are said to be those that lead the bridegroom into the chamber ; or who looked after the garnishing of the chamber. The sons of this world, Luke XX. 34, that is, who lead a mortal life ; to whom are opposed the sons of the resurrection, that is, those who shall rise to blessed im- mortality, and are the sons of God, that is, partakers of divine felicity. Thus there is mention made of the sons of the kingdom of light and darkness, Matt. vili. 12 ; 1 Thess. v. 5. But here by the word " of prophets," is meant, their prophecies, by a metonyme of the cause. Saying to Abraham. Oen. xxii. 18 ; which he repeats to Isaac, and lastly to Jacob, Gen. xxvi. 4 ; xxviii. 14. And in thy seed. As if he had said. From thy offspring shall be born the Saviour of all men, of what nation soever, who shall believe in him. See Gal. iii. 8, 14, 16. 26. Unto you, &c. As if he had said. He, who by this promise was foretold that he was to be born from the oflFspring of Abra- ham, is Jesus the Son of God, whom being already born the Son Man, God has sent to you, his kinsmen, that first, the benefits he is to bestow upon those that believe in him, might be oifered to you -before the. rest of the nations, that thereby every one of you might be excited to reform his conversation. See ch. xiii. 46. Raising. That is, presenting, bringing forth In open view, making him conspicuous by most excellent endowments and gifts. It refers to the prophecies of Moses before mentioued, ver. 22. Hence, to rise, or be raised, is attributed to the prophets, Deut. xlii. 1; xxxiv. 10, &c. ; see ch. xiii. 12; Judges 11. 16, 18; ill. 2, 15 ; Ezek. xxxiv. 23; Amos. il. 11. To bless you. That is, to offer you the highest of blessings. Under the word blessing Is comprehended all manner of felicity 88 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. IV. with which God hath [blessed us], and shall bless us through Christ, as remission of sins, eternal life, and all other celestial advantages. In turning, &c. That is, That he may excite every one of you to change your vicious and corrupt custom of living, into a pure and undefiled conversation. CHAPTER IV. And the captain of the temple. That is. Who was the chief of all that had the charge of guarding the temple. For every night the temple was guarded by twenty-four companies, that keep watch in twenty-four places : to wit, the priests in three places, and the Levites in all the rest. Now that the chiefs or overseers of these watches are signified by the name of captains, Luke xxii. 40, the famous Lightfoot does nowise question. He also believes, that to these watches or guards, that of Pilate referred, Ye have a watch. Matt, xxvii. 65. As if he had said. Ye have watches of your own, send some of those to guard the sepulchre. To this the same author adds, " I take the captain of the temple, distinctly and for pre- eminency so called, to be the same with the man of the mountain's house, that is the governor of the mountain's temple, who was the chief of all the chief officers of the watches. For, as Maimonides observes, there was one chief ruler who commanded all the watches, who was called the governor of the mountain's house. He went the rounds all night, having lighted torches carried before him. And when he met with any of the watch that stood not upright upon his feet, the captain said to him, 'Peace be with thee:' upon which, if he found him asleep, he waked him with his cudgel. He had also power to burn the garments of him that slept. There- fore it was a common saying at Jerusalem : What's the stir here ? Sure the Levite is beaten, or his clothes are burned, because he slept in his watch." Sadducees. That is, who placed all their hopes in this life, and therefore thought they could not be too severe against those that disturbed the peace of the people, wherein their own quiet was so much concerned. " Add," saith Grotius, " that if Jesus had risen from the dead, the victory had been apparently on the side of the VER. VI.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 89 Pharisees, in the great controversy between those two sects." See ch. xxiii. 6, 7. 2. Being grieved. In the Greek, " being vexed or troubled." Through Jesus. That is, Through the power and efficacy of Jesus, who rose from the dead, the first-fruits of them that slept ; the dead shall rise, 1 Cor. xv. 20, 23. 3. Put them in hold. Not in a public prison, as ch. v. 18, but into private custody, as below, ch. xxiv. 23. That is, they did not commit them to prison, but into the hands of some private person, to be kept diligently. 4. Five thousand. Or, according to the Greek and Syriac, about five thousand. Thus behold Peter, of a catcher of fish become an expert fisher of men : at two or three casts of his net catching about five thousand disciples. 5. Their rulers. I find the senators of which the great San- hedrim consisted, frequently called rulers or princes, ch. iii. 17; Luke xxiv. 20 ; John iii. 9, &c. And elders. That is, according to the interpretation of Grotius, senators of the city of Jerusalem. For there were at Jerusalem, besides the great Sanhedrim, two other lesser ones, of which we have spoken upon Matt. v. 21. Though the senators of what San-- hedrim soever were named elders, yet, when the senators of the great Sanhedrim are thus named, there is most commonly added, " of the people," to distinguish them from the elders of towns, or senators of lesser Sanhedrims. And scribes. That is, assistants to the elders for counsel and advice, as being men skilled in the law. 6 And Annas. This president of the Sanhedrim is by Josephus' called Ananus, the son of Seth, advanced to the high priesthood in the room of Joazar by Cyrenius, and deposed by Valerius Gratus. He had five sons, who all enjoyed the high priesthood, which never happened before to any man, as Josephus observes. '^ His son-in-law, Joseph, surnamed Caiaphas, was now high priest and father of the Sanhedrim. For though the chief priests were generally in the great Sanhedrim, yet they are commonly named in particular by reason of their great authority. The high priest. Since it is plain that Caiaphas was advanced to -the high priesthood by Valerius Gratus, about the fourth year of Tiberius, before Pilate came to the government of Jewry, and ' Aiitiq. xviii. 3. ' Aritiq. xx. 8, 90 THE ACTS 01' THJi HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. IV. removed by Vitellius towards the end of Tiberius's reign, when Pilate left • Judea ; it may deservedly be questioned, why Annas here, and Luke iii. 2, is called high priest : to which Casaubon answers, because that Annas had already borne that high dignity. Scaliger and BuUinger say, that Annas was so called, because he was next to Caiaphas, and his segan, vicar, or lieutenant-general in all the sacred ministry. But Baronius says, it was because he was prince of the grea,t Sanhedrim. " Certainly," says Blondel, a person, of inexhausted learning, "there were among the Jews not only many priests, but many chief priests, when David had distinguished the posterity of Aaron into twenty-four families, who were to officiate in the sacred ministry by turns. Over every one of these families there was a chief, who is_ called the head of the paternal house in the Talmud. The same person was called chief priest in respect of his classis. Hence it is that they are called chief priests in the gospel, and in Jeremiah elders of the priests. Matt., ii. 3 ; xvi. 21 ; xx. 18; xxi. 19, 23, 25 ; Mark viii. 31 ; x. 33; Jer. xxix. 1. " Over these twenty-four families were two chiefs, of which the first was called properly the high priest, and many times singly, priest. His vicar might indeed have been numbered among the chief priests at the beginning; but whether he alone by himself were at any time called high priest, I much question. Certainly BuUinger ought to have proved it, before he affirmed that Annas was called high priest because he was the high priest's vicar. " In scripture this vicar is called the second priest, not the first. 2 Kings XXV. 18 ; Jer. Iii. 24. The Chaldee paraphrast renders it, segan. Therefore we read in the Talmud,' that the segan and high priest officiated according to their lots. Not that they were chosen by lots, but that they distributed one with another by lots several of the sacerdotal functions. And a little after, 'as often as it happened that the high priest was suspended from his func^ tion, the segan was ordered to officiate for him.' " Out of the 2 Kings xxiii. 4, it seems that it might be gathered that there were many second priests, seeing it is said there in the plural number, "the priests of the second order;" but the Chal- dee paraphrast translates in that place, 'And the segan,' in the singular, because often the plural number ia used for the sin- gular. ' Joma. fol. 30. VEIi. VI.] LITEllALLY EXPLAINED. 91 "If Annas was vicar to Caiaphas, as BuUinger will have it, how comes it to pass that by the evsmgelists Annas is always set before Caiaphas? In the 2 Chron. xxxi. 12, the ruler over the treasury of the sanctuary is called nagid, ruler, Cononiah, and Shimei his brother the next. Were it proper there that Shimei should be called nagid and be set before Cononiah ? " If Annas were called high: priest, because he had formerly officiated in that dignity, how comes it to pass, that among so many others, who had borne the same office, only Apnas should be mentioned ? How comes it to pass, that he that had been high priest should be always set before him that is yet high priest ? These expontifices were indeed called pontiffis for honour's sake, but never any public acts were marked with their names. " Therefore, here, I prefer iax Baronius before Casaubon, Sca- liger, or Bullinger either, who asserts Annas to be called high priest because he was president of tie- great Sanhedrim, which by the Hebrews was called nasi. And the person next to him was called. The father of the house of justice. These two chiefs of the Sanhedrim were both styled priests, because they were over many priests. Hence, if I mistake not, we read that the sons of David were priests, 2 Sam. viii. 1 8 ; that is, according to the Chal- dee paraphrast, grandees ; and, indeed, _they were grandees, be- cause both David's sons were presidents or princes of the great Sanhedrim." Thus far Blondel, which will be more plain out of the following words of Selden : — " We are to understand," saith he, " that those titles of high or chief priests, which denote a certain function or dignity in the form of the Jewish government at that time much impaired, denoted either a sacred function, or civil dignity, which the high- priest enjoyed above the rest. Where mention is made together of the high-priest, and of the sacred function proper to the dignity, there that very person is signified who obtained the peculiar digriity, that is, the high priesthood derived together with the sacred function from Aaron. But where mention is made not at all of the sacred function, but altogether of the civil government of the high-priests, that is, as they governed with an authority limited by the Romans, — as in many places of the gospel, and of the Acts of the Apostles— there it seems very probable that the high priests are designed by that title, not as they were advanced to the sacred dignity, but as they presided in the civil admlnistra- 92 THE 'ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. IV. tion. Such a difference concerning the title is to be observed in some ancient synods, where mention is made of counts. Now the dignity of count was altogether belonging to the emperor's court, and as it had no reference to the synods, being a dignity within the emperor's palace or court, so, as the counts had in the synods the delegated power of Csesar, that title has no relation at all to the palace or to its first notion. But we meet in the first action of the council of Chalcedon with these two phrases : — ' Give the counts,' and 'the counts entered in.' Where the notion of counts, however a word generally used, shows that singular and particular dignity in respect of which they who were counts presided in the council, instead of the emperor's ; not at all its vulgar acceptation for that other dignity, by which they belonged to the emperor's , palace. Insomuch, that I think that by the high priests they were no more understood as high priests in respect of their sacred function, where they are mentioned in the places speaking con- cerning the civil administration, than we understand by counts in that synod their particular dignity, either in the council-house, or elsewhere in the emperor's palace. Hence with licence to con- jecture L shoiald think, that Annas and Caiaphas, both together styled high priests by St. Luke, were not so styled to note their dignity of the sacred function, but their civil government, as well as of the others they are joined with for that year there mentioned. That is to say, that Annas was prince of the Sanhedrim, as Baronius will have it, and Caiaphas father thereof. Let us sup- pose that there were such two jurisdictions of counts in the synod before mentioned, or in any other, for we hear of counts also in the synod of Ephesus. If any One had noted the year of Cassar's reign in the acts of the synod, and had added, for example's sake, under Irenaeus and Dionysius counts, certainly no man would have believed them to have been there named counts from that jurisdic- tion they enjoyed according to the vulgar and original notion of the word, but from the jurisdiction they had obtained since, as according to the custom of that age, some others being dignified witL the title of counts. Which being admitted, it is easy to judge why in the gospel Annas and Caiaphas help mutually so much one another in their proceedings against Christ, both under the title of high priests. That is to say, as they by reason of their dignity and kindred of the high priest, as then the times were, presided in the manner aforesaid in the Sanhedrim, where the prosecution com- VKK. VI.] LITEllALLY EXPLAINED. ' 93 menced ; which may not be unfitly said of Annas the high priest, and Caiaphas, with other senators of the Sanhedrim, mentioned in Acts iv. So that the reason is easily given, why XDaiaphas, by Josephus said at that time to have been invested with the sacred dignity as the successor of Aaron, is set after Annas. For the father was alway second to the prince of the Sanhedrim. Neither was the office of prince or father of the Sanhedrim perpetual, but translated from one to another, as occasion required. Which is apparent out of the Talmudic title, Horjaoth, ch. iii, and other treatises of the rabbles. And perhaps at that time it was annual, lest the prolongation of that authority might be a prejudice to the rest of the kindred of the high priest. And hence, perhaps, that other question is to be resolved concerning the high priesthood of Caiaphas, noted by his year in the Gospel of St. John. For as the plural number of high priests, in the sacred. relations of the" administration of civil concerns, signified judges and presidents of courts, as it has been said already, so the title of high priest in the singular number, with the account of his year, may seem to denote the prince of the Sanhedrim. So that in the fifteenth year of Tiberius, Annas was prince, and Caiaphas was father of the San- hedrim, Luke iii. 1, 2. But in the Passion year Annafl was father, and Caiaphas prince. Afterwards Annas as being most eminent among his people again prince, and Caiaphas father, as in Acts iv. And certainly Ananias the high priest. Acts xxiii. 5, where he presides in the Sanhedrim, is acknowledged prince of the people, which perhaps was the same thing with prince of the Sanhedrim. There are many other places in the New Testament to be expounded perhaps, by such an observation. Nor let any one pbjeijt, that thereby it might come to pass, that the high priest advanced to the dignity of the sacred function, should give place to the prince of the Sanhedrim in the time of his being only father, and, consequently, be inferior to him in that state of com- monwealth. For that was so true, as to the civil administration of government, of which we discourse, that the high priest himself was not only obnoxious to the jurisdiction of the great Sanhedrim, but also of the inferior Sanhedrims, as is frequently to be seen in the Talmud and other writings of the Jews. So that it is no wonder that he, as a member of the great Sanhedrim, should be but next in authority to the prince of the Sanhedrim. It is to be noted also, that the mast learned rabbles instruct us,' ' Juchasin, folio 169. 94 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. IV. that the two names of those by whose hands in former times their oral law was delivered, are so to be understood in the solemn numbering of them, thaf the one denotes the prince, the other the father of the Sanhedrim. So that it is no new thing to believe that these two were more particularly joined than the rest, and were named together in matters of great moment. And frequently among the Talmudists mention is made of Ezra, and of such others with their Sanhedrim, in the management of business, as if then they were customarily to be taken for princes of the Sanhedrim." Thus far the learned Selden. And John. Whom Lightfoot conjectures to have been the famous Jochanan Ben Zaccai the priest, ' who is said to have Hved a, hundred and twenty years ; and forty years before the destruc- tion of Jerusalem, when the gates of the temple opened of them- selves, is reported to have said,' " O temple, why dost thou disturb thyself, I know thou shalt be destroyed, for so Zechariah has prophesied : Open . ihy~ doors, O Lebanon, that the fire may devour thy cedars, Zeeh. xi. 1." " After the destruction of Jerusalem,'' saith Lightfoot,^ " he got leave of Titus, that Jabneh might receive aind retain the Sanhedrim. There he presided himself two or five years, for the certain number is disputed." And as many as were of the kindred of the priests. . In the Greek, "of the high priest," as the common English translation hath, and the Syriac and Arabic version also. That is, " whose ancestors," saith Grotius, "not long before enjoyed the high priesthood, which great nobility caused them to be admitted into the great Sanhedrim." 7. By what power. As much as to say. By -whose effectual virtue, or by whose command and authority have ye cured this person lame from his mother's womb ? 8* Filled with the Holy Ghost, That is, moved and excited by a certain inspiration of the Holy Spirit, according to the promise of Christ, Matt. x. 19, 20 ; Luke xxi. 14, 15, who promised his apostles, that when they were brought before presidents, kingSj and magistrates, that utterance and wisdom should be given to ihem, which all their adversaries should not be able to withstand ; for that they should not speak themselves, but the Spirit of the Father should speak within them. 9. If. This particle is here put for "since," or " seeing that." ' Juchasin, folio 60. » Joma. folio Sf). ' In Centur. Chorographic. before Matt. "^-R- X.] LITHEALLY EXPLAINED. 95 We this day be examined. That is, "be indicted," according to the Syriac; or "be brought before the judges," according to the interlineary gloss ; or « be reproved," according to the Latin inter- preter of Irenseus ; or, as Lyranus expounds it, " be brought to ju(%ment as malefactors." In the Greek, as Grrotius interprets the word, he examined. Of the good deed done to the impotent man. That is, because we have done the same person a kindness. By what means he is made whole. As if he had said. To answer by whose power and authority, this man lame from his mother's womb has received the ability of walking and sound health. 10. By the name. That is, by the power and authority. Whom ye crucified. By the hands of the Eoman soldiers. Thus David is said to have killed Uriah, as is there added, by the sword of the children of Amman, 2 Sam. xii. 9. Whom. By your means put to so cruel and ignominious a death. God. Who will show himself as opposite \o your deeds and endeavours, as you were to his counsel and will. Raised from the dead. That is, delivered from death, restored to life. This. To wit, Christ Jesus typified by David. Is. That is to say, like David. The stone which was set at nought. That is, rejected, contemned, and refused, as no wise fit, even to be used in the most vile part of the building. Of you builders. By you, the senators of the great Sanhedrim, and of the city of Jerusalem, to whose care and guardianship, the religion and commonwealth of the people of God is entrusted. Which. To wit, being raised from the dead. Is become the head of the corner. That is, is advanced by God to so high a dignity, that like the chief corner-stone he supports and sustains the whole weight of the spiritual building. Most ad- admirably and learnedly has that equally most religious and eminently lettered Divine, Doctor Simon Patrick, Dean of Peter- borough, whose signal and sincere charity I have often experienced, expressed the literal and mystical sense of this verse, in his golden paraphrase upon Ps. cxviii. 22 : " He whom the great men and rulers of the people regected, 1 Sam. xxvi. 19, as the builders of a house do a stone that is not fit to be employed in it, is now 96 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. IV. become our King, to whom we must all join ourselves if we hope for safety. In whom we see a figure of that glorious King, who shall hereafter be in like manner refused, Luke xix. 14, xx. 17, and then be by God exalted to be Lord of all the world, and the foundation of all men's happiness." See our literal explication, Matt. xxi. 42. 12. Neither is there. As if he had said. In this Christ alone, God -hath put the salvation of all men, even their eternal salvation, " which is not to be attained but by the mediator of God and men, the man Jesus Christ," as saith Leo the Great., For there is no other name. That is, any other person. So ch. i. 15. Name is taken for person. And here there seems to be some reason why the word name is made use of, because in dangers and vows they are wont to be invoked, and their names to be expressed from whom we expect assistance and safety. Under heaven. That is, in any place whatever. A synecdoche of the species for the genus, that is, "place under heaven" for "any place." For as often as we discourse concerning human things, men being under heaven, and their place here spacious and large, whatever we allege not to be under heaven we look upon to be nowhere. Given among men. That is, given by God to mankind as their Saviour. Whereby we ynust be saved. That is, through whom we ouo'ht to seek our salvation, or through whom we must of necessity obtain our salvation, if we intend to be saved. 13. Boldness. That is, freedom of speech and presence of mind. Unlettered. That is, without the knowledge of good letters and honest learning ; for the apostles knew their letters, and had read the scriptures, and retained them by heart r but they were not versed in harder studies, by which the minds of men are fraught with understanding. And idiots. That is, plebeians, men of mean and inconsiderable fortunes, as 1 Sam. xviii. 23 : A poor man and lightly esteemed, or "contemned and abject," is rendered by the Chaldee para- phrast, "a poor man and an idiot." And ch. xxiv. 14, where David in contempt calls himself a dead dog and a flea, the Chaldee paraphrast renders it " weak, and idiot." ' Ep. 83, ad Palestin. V£K. XIX.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 97 15. Aside out of the council. That is, without the council- house, where the Sanhedrim was assembled. 17. Let us straitly threaten them. This translation expresses perfectly the meaning of the - Greek text, which has, " let us threaten them with threats." In this name. That is, by the command and authority of Jesus of Nazareth. At all. That from that time forward they should neither speak nor preach anything, pretending the authority of Jesus of Naza- reth, so as that anything should be said to be divulged by his command. 19. Whether it be right. That is, whether it be allowable by the law of honesty and reason. In the sight of God. Who though men be never so blind, will never suffer any one to be preferred before him. To hearken unto you more than unto God. Thus the young man answered Antiochus, commanding him to eat swine's flesh against the law of God, 2 Mac. vii. 33, / will not obey the king's command- ' ment, but I will obey the commandment of the law that was given unto our fathers by Moses. It is recorded that Polycarpus upon his martyrdom said, " We have learnt to give honours which are due to emperors and powers established by God, and which are no impediment to our salvation." Of the mother of the family, thus Clement of Alexandria : " She shall obey her husband in all things, nor shall she do anything without his consent, unless what she believes to be a help to attain virtue and salvation." Of children, thus St. 'Paul, Eph. vi. 1, Children, obey your parents in the Lord. That is, according to the exposition of Chrysostom, " In what ye offend not God." Quintilian : ' "It is not necessary for children to do all those things which their parents command. There be many things which cannot be done. If thou com- mandest thy son to give a contrary sentence to his opinion. If thou desirest him to witness a thing of which he knows nothing. If thou commandest me to burn the capitol, or seize the castle, it is lawful for me to answer, These are things which must not be done." The same author in another place: " All manner of obedience is not to be given to parents, otherwise there would be nothing more pernicious than received benefits, should they oblige us to all manner of servitude." Jerome also," "If a master," ' Declam. 271. ' In Tit. ii., cited by Gratian. H 98 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. IV. saith he, "command those things which are not contrary to the sacred scriptures, let the servant be subject to the master. But if he command those things that are repugnant to it, let him rather obey the Lord of the spirit, than the master of the body." Again,^ " If it be good which the emperor or governor commands, let him obey the will of the commander ; but if it be evil, answer from the Acts of the Apostles, We ought to obey God rather than men. Acts v. 28. The same is to be understood concerning ser- vants toward their masters, wives toward their husbands, and children toward their parents, that they ought only to be obedient to their masters, their husbands, their parents, in those things which interfere not with the commands of God." The same Gratian in the same place, out of St. Austin's sixth Sermon upon the words of the Lord: Whosoever resists the power, resists the ordinance of God. "But what if he command that which it behoves thee not to do ? Here, indeed, out of fear of powers contemn power. Observe the degrees themselves of human thingSi- If the governor command anything to be done, is he not to be obeyed? Nevertheless, if the proconsul command the contrary, thou verily dost not contemn the power, but choosest, to obey the more supreme authority. Again, if the proconsul command one thing, and the emperor command another, can any person doubt but that the latter is to be obeyed, the first to be disobeyed ? So if the emperor command one thing -arid God another, what think ye ? Pay your tribute, obey me, right ; but not in the idol temple. He forbids obedience in idol temple. Who forbids? The higher power. Pardon me ; thou threatenest me with impri- sonment. He with hell-fire. Here faith is to be made use of as a - shield, by which thou mayest resist all the fiery darts of the enemy." The same author in the same place :^ "The emperor Julian was an infidel. Was he not an apostate, a wicked person and an Idolater? Christian soldiers served a heathen emperor. , But when It came to the cause of Christ, they only acknowledged him, who was in heaven. When he commanded them to worship idols, and offer Incense to them, they preferred God before him. But when he bid them take the field, and march against such a nation, they obeyed him immediately. They distinguished their eternal Lord from their temporal lord. And yet in obedience to their eternal Lord they were subject to their temporal lord." The same Gratian in the same place,' out of Isidorus : " If he who ' In Tit. iii. ' Cap. 98, Ex August, in Psa. exxiv. 3. ' C. 101. VER. XXi] LITEIULLy EXPLAINED. 99 is in authority has done, or commanded any one to do what is prohibited by the Lord, or has omitted, or commanded any precept to be omitted, the sentence of St. Paul is to be brought to such a one's mind, where he says, GaL i. : Though either we or an angel from heaven preach to you any other gospel, than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. If any one prohibit you from doing what is commanded by Grod; or, on the other side, command that to be done which God prohibits, let him be accursed of all that love God. He that is in authority, if he speak or command anything which is contrary to the will of God, or contrary to what is expressly commanded in scripture, let him be accounted as a false witness of God, and a sacrilegious psrson." The like to all these things contained in cap. 101, are to be read in the rules of St. Basil briefly disputed, cap. 114, 103. See also the Book of the Institutes of the Monks, written by the same St. Basil, 0. 14, 16. 20. For^ we cannot, &c. That is. It is not by any means lawful for us, or we cannot in conscience ; or our conscience does by no means permit us, against the revealed wiU of God, to conceal what we have seen and heard. Thus " not to can," is taken for " not to be lawful," frequently in scripture, as may be seen, Gen. xliii. 32; 1 Cor. X. 21. We are to take notice, saith Curcellaeus, our coun- tryman, "that this speech does not always denote a true (and properly so called) want of power, or inability, but sometimes a vehement aversion of the mind from any thing. As when Peter and John say. Acts iv. 20, We cannot but we must speak those things which we have seen and heard: and John, 1 John iii. 9, Whoever is born of God cannot sin ; also where the Lord Jesus testifies of the angel of the church of Ephesus, Apoc. ii. 2, that he could not bear them which are evil. Not that it was impossible for all these to do those things which are spoken of in those places, but because they had an abhorrency from such actions. Which was the reason why the Jews could not believe in the doctrine of Christ, John xii. 39. For finding it to be repugnant to their carnal desires, they were so averse to it, that they would not admit it, though they could easily have done it, had they been so minded. With which he openly reproaches them, when he says, John v. 44, How can ye believe who receive honoitr one of another, and seek not the honour which cometh from God only f See our annotations upon Amos iii. 8. 21. So when tiiey had further -threatened them. That is, when H 2 100 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. IV. they had charged them upon pain to forbear speaking and teaching in the name of Christ. How they might. That is, under what specious pretence. Glorified God for that which was done. In the Greek, "gave glory to Grod." We find here the people more rightly judg- ing of divine things than they who challenged to themselves the chief authority in sacred things ; for the people acknowledge the miracle and praise God for it. The elders, pontiffs, priests, and doctors of the law, do not only refuse to acknowledge it, and go about to' deprive it of its deserved praise, but also wickedly deem it worthy of punishment. 22. Forty years old, &c. Luke here declares, that all whom their passions had not blinded could not but judge this cure of the lame person a most wonderful miracle, in regard he had been lame from his mother's womb for forty years together and upward, for diseases of long continuance are not easily eradicated : inso- much, that though they are not natural, they at length become a second nature, getting a head, and hardening with age. 23. Tliey went to theirs. In Greek as in English," " to their own." That is, to the rest of the Christians ; for no men are so peculiarly the Christians' as the Christians themselves. A Chris- tian is to a Christian his domestic, his kinsman, his brother. 24. And when they had heard. That is, the threats of the Sanhe- drim, or of the council of the chief of the Jews. They did not betake themselves to tears, nor despond in their minds ; nor, de- spairing of a good cause, did they go about to abandon it ; but being destitute of human aid, they betook themselves to implore the assistance of Heaven, believing that then chiefly to begin, when the other forsakes them. With one accord. The consent of pious people, and unanimity of mind, is of great efficacy in prayer to move God. See Matt, xviii. 19, 20. They lifted up their voice. With a fervent zeal and a generous ardour of mind. To God. There are no arms for Christians to use against the magistrate when he endeavours to oppress the truth, and the pro- fessors of it, by his authority and force, but prayers to God for the magistrate and his salvation. That is to say, that through the mind-changing and heart-converting power of God, he may be reclaimed from opposing the truth : or if he have threatened any VER. XXV.] LITJJRALLY EXPLAINED. 101 thing to the professors of it, to prevent him from putting it in execution. Lord. To whose divine power all beings in nature are obe- dient. Thou. To whose clemency, for succour, we thy suppliants have betaken ourselves. Art. In the Greek and vulgar English is added, " God," or, "the God." Who, &c. As if he had said, whom the creation of all things demonstrates to excel in immense power and infinite strength. 25. Who. As if he had said. Who to thy demonstration of power to help, hast added thy promise of assistance, that resting upon thy promise and power togethier, we may implore thy aid with certain hope of obtaining it. By the Holy Ghost.^ That is, foretelling future things by thy divine instinct and inspiration. Of thy child. That is, thy servant, as it is rendered in the com- mon English translation. Why, &c. As if he had said. Why rages the wicked and violent design to destroy the kingdom set up of God ? For it shall prove no more effectual than if a fly opposed an elephant, or if any one should go about to throw down the sun from heaven. In the literal sense this is to be understood of the kingdom of David, typifying the kingdom of Christ. David beheld himself encom- passed on every side with most potent enemies, the Philistines, Moabites, Sabteans, Damascenes, Ammonites, and Idumseans, and beset with powerful hosts, 2 Sam. v. 17 ; viii. 1, &c.; x. 6, &c. However, David derides the vain^endeavours of all their threaten- ing numbers to deprive him of a kingdom so firmly assured to him from Heaven. But in a mystical sense, the Holy Ghost speaking by the mouth of David, reproaches the ridiculous malice of the world for daring to invade Christ and his chtirch ; whereas God has ordained by his inviolable decree, though the universality of men, both high and low, combined in an impious and nefarious con- spiration, oppose Christ and his church, yet all their fury will come to nothing. And that this mystical sense of the second Psalm ' This is not in the vulgar English, but it is in the Greek original. [Some Greek copies read a Sia arojiaTOQ AatiS rraiioq aov iv TlvevftaTi ayiifi- — others, o Sia nvtvitaros ayiov Sia. tTTo/t, K.r.X. Wicliffe's version of 1 380 follows the last reading. Cranmer's Bible of 1539, the first. It is also found in the Douay version.] 102 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. IV. belongs to the Messiah, both Eabbi David Kimchi, Saadias Gaon, Jarchi, and -others acknowledge. 26. Stood up. As if he had said, the princes mentioned in the places last cited, wickedly conspired against the irresistible decree of the omnipotent God, and against David, solemnly anointed by the command of God, 2 Sam. viii. 10 ; 1 Sam. xvi. 13 ; 2 Sam. ii. 4; V. 3. Those princes were the type of all those, who, refusing to be subject to the Lord Christ, are violently carried forth to their own destruction to make opposition against God,, whose pleasure it is to reign in Christ's person. Now, David being by the com- mand of God anointed king, was an adumbration of the Son of God, Jesus the Messiah, or Christ, that is, the anointed by the Eternal Father, to the priestly, prophetical, and kingly dignity, not with terrestrial oil, but with celestial gifts of the Holy Ghost, Isa. Ixi. 1. . The kings of the earth. Thus by way of extenuation he calls those princes who were enemies to David, and to Jesus Christ, who was typified by David: and to them he opposes God, whose dwelling is in the heavens, whose vast power is not confined to those narrow bounds that limit human force. 27. Were gathered together. As if he had said. For these ene- mies of David were types of Herodes Antipas, tetrarch of Galilee, and Pontius Pilate, governor of Judea, who, though in other things there was no good correspondence between them, they con- sented together with heathens and Jews, to the destruction of Christ, Luke xxiii. Child. When it is spoken of Jesus, Hilary and Ambrose trans- slate the Greek word, iraiBa, " son," as Erasmus notes upon this place. Whom thou hast anointed. That is, whom thou hast inaugurated king, priest, and prophet, by the unction of the Holy Ghost. Herod and Pontius Pilate. By virtue of a Hebraism peculiar to the Scripture, they who have a derived and deputed power are called kings. With the Gentiles. That is, with the Ethnics, who were either counsellors with, or officers under Pilate, who was the Roman governor of Judea. And the peoples of Israel. The Jews are called the peoples of Israel, in the plural number, not only because they consisted of the twelve tribes, each of which constituted as it were a distinct TEE. XXVII. J LITERAIXY EXPLAINED. 103 people : as Isaac prayed for Jacob, Gen. xxviii. 3, and God him- self promised. Gen. xlviii. 4; but also because they were a mul- titude equally as numerous, as if many nations had been conjoined together, Judg. v. 14. 28. To do, &c. As if he had said. That they being permitted to give way to their own passions, whatever thou hadst ordained in thy eternal wisdom might come to pass ; that is to say, that thy Son should be brought to the shameful death of the cross by the hands of the wicked, for the salvation of mankind. " The wicked," saith Junius, " execute the will of God, when they least dream of it : they execute the will of God : nevertheless they are not exempted from fault." For God contributes nothing to the impiety of the wicked, though he let loose the reins of their malice, and out of his most profound wisdom direct their fury rather against one than another, and give them the power to execute. Thy hand. That Is, thy power. God, in regard of his omnipo- tency, wills nothing but what he can do ; and when It Is his plea- sure to defend. In vain the enemies of truth lay their ambushes against, the professors of It. "Therefore there Is nothing done unless the Omnipotent will have It done, either by permitting it be done, or by doing it himself:" saith St. Austin, Enchlrid. cap. 95. And thy counsel. The counsels of men often come to nothing, because they cannot effect what they have a desire to do : but the counsels and determinations of God never fail. " For," as Austin says, Enchlrid. cap. 96, " as easy as it Is for the omnipotent to do what he pleases, so easy Is it for him not to permit what he has no mind should be done." Determined to be done. In the Greek, " prellmited to be done." " For," saith Simon Grynseus, a person excellently well read In the Greek and Latin, "the Greek word signifies to prellmit, or to circumscribe, as It were, within a space or circle." Moreover, It is to be observed, that this whole eight and twentieth verse may be aptly joined with the words of the verse last preceding, whom thou hast anointed, In this manner: "For Pontius Pilate and Herod have really gathered together, with the GentUes and people of Israel in this city, against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed to do what thy hand and counsel decreed to be done." Which is an egregious sense of the words, and most exactly agrees with the series of the context. " For thus," saith the famous divine 104 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLBS [cHAP. IV. of our age, Stephen Curcellaeus, " the apostles were desirous to show their confidence in God, by openly professing that all the endeavours of the enemies of Christ to disturb the propagation of the gospel, should be of no eifect ; nor should they be able to hinder, but that what God had decreed should be done by Christ and his servants for the salvation of the world, should be duly per- formed and executed. Neither ought that transposition of the words offend any one, or seem unusual, seeing that there be many such in the scriptures. Of which it will be sufficient to bring two or three examples. Kev. xiii. 8, we read: And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship the beast, whose names are riot written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. Where the last words, from the foundation of the world, are not to be connected with the preceding words, the Lamb slain, but with the more remote words : thus, whose names are not written from the foundation of the world, in the booh of life of the Lamb slain. See also a harder trajection, Luke ii. 34, 35, where thp last words. That the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed, are to be connected with these, and for a sign that shall be spoken against, though there be an interposition of these words between : Yea, a ■sword shall pierce through thy own soul also. See also chap. iv. 5, where you are to read. And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain in a moment of time, shewed him all the kingdoms of the earth ; not as it is vulgarly pointed, " he showed him all the king- doms of the earth in a moment of time." For that could not be done ; besides that it was contrary to the design of the devil, which was to detain the Lord Jesus for some time at least in the contemplation of the glory and splendour of those kingdoms, to excite his desire and ambition, not to show him passant, as it were a flash of lightning. Lastly, where you find any parentheses inserted in scripture, there those transpositions are always to be found ; which is so frequent in the Epistles of St. Paul, that you meet with three or four in the first seven commas of his Epistle to the Eomans; concerning which thing interpreters may be consulted, and among the rest, Beza, and Piscator, under the word trajectio. 29. And now. The adverb of time, and now, is a collective, or rational conjunction, inferring a conclusion out of what precedes, and is here used for "therefore," or "for this reason." As Gen. iv. 11, 21, 23, and in other places. Lord, behold their threatenings, &c. As if he had said. Assuage VBll. XXXII.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 105 the threats of the magistrates, lest they break forth to the op- pression of the truth; and that thy servants, boldly and intrepidly, in defiance of those threats, may preach the doctrine of Christ, and show thy might and power to work miracles, as often as we shall humbly" beseech thee to do it for the sake of thy holy son Jesiis. This manner of inspiring fortitude into the ministers of Christ, ceases at this day ; seeing that the force of the miracles formerly wrought by the apostles, still remains in its full vigour and efficacy. 30. And when they had prayed. In the Greek, "while they were yet praying." That is, they had scarce finished their suppli- cations. The place was shaken. To the end the disciples might laiow that God was at hand by this testimony of his divine presence; and certainly understand that their prayers were heard according to the promise of Christ, John xiv. 13. Whatever ye shall ask the Father in my name, that is, trusting in my promises and merits, that will I do ; that is, I will take care that ye shall obtain it : and John xvi. 23 ; Verily, verily, I say unto you, whatever ye shall ask the Father iri my name, he will give it you. Something like this passage of the shaking of the place, you find in Virgil. ', " See where the omen comes, by heaven distilled, Into your breasts with fear and horror filled. Scarce had I spoke, when on a sudden all The massy pile seemed ready just to fall ; The temple thresholds, sacred laurel shook, The mountain too a quivering ague took." And they were alljilled with the Holy Ghost. That is, they felt the power and efficacy of the Holy Ghost more vigorously operating in their hearts at that time than before, and found themselves possessed of the promises of Christ: Whosoever hath, to Mm shall be given, and he shall have more abundance ; and every branch in me that beareth fruit, my Father purgeth it, that it may bear more fruit, Matt. xiii. 12; John xv. 2. And they spak^ the word, of God with boldness. As if he had said. And now no longer terrified, or hindered by their fears, they spread the word of God more boldly and freely. 32. And the multitude, &c. As much as to say. And among so many thousands who had embraced the faith of Christ, such was the concord and unanimity of mind, that there was not the least ,' ' ^n. iii. ver. 89, &c. 106 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. IV. appearance of dissension in the whole number. This happy concord Christ himself declares should be a mark and badge of his disciples; and prays the Father to infuse it into them, that the world might know that he had sent him, John xiii. 15 ; xvii. 21, 23. Of one heart and of one soul. A proverbial manner of speech, signifying the most perfect consent of minds, 1 Chron. xii. 38, All the rest of Israel were of one heart to make David kinff ; 2 Chron. XXX. 12, And in all Judah they hand of God was to give them one heart to do the commandment of the l\ing andj of the princes, hy the word of the Lord; Jer. xxxli. 39, / will give them one heart and one way, that they may fear me. That is, I will cause them tmanimously to profess one religion. Aristotle, in Diogenes Laertius, putting the question. What a friend was? answers, " One soul inhabiting in two bodies." And so Cicero : ' " That law of just and true friendship is very ancient, that friends should always will the same thing.' Neither is there any more certain tie of friendship than the consent and concord of counsels and wills." Neither any of them, &c. As if he had said, Nay, this sacred and praiseworthy concord among believers brake forth into external liberality, so that none of them privately enjoyed his estate or goods, which used to be estimated at the price of money, without regarding the necessities of others ; but as their occasions required, they also freely granted the use of them to those that wanted. 2 " This is by a spiritual birth to be truly born the sons of God. This is according to the heavenly law, to imitate the equality of God the Father. For whatever is God's is in common for our use. No man is prohibited from the participation of his benefits, but all mankind equally enjoy his bounty and goodness. Thus the day illuminates all alike; the sun shines, the showers water, the wind blows upon all alike. Sleep is the same to all, and the light of the stars and moon is common to all. By which example of equality, whoever is a possessor of land upon earth, and shares his Income and revenues with the brother- hood, while he Is common and just in his free and voluntary largesses, he Is an imitator of God." 33. And with great power. As if he said. But the resurrection of Christ, the foundation of all Christian religion, and of our * In Orat. pro Plane. » Cypi. sub finem lib. de Opere et Eleem. VER. XXXVI.J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 107 hopes therein comprehended, the apostles did not only vigorously and constantly maintain in words, but also, as they had prayed before, confirmed by the signal and astonishing miracles they wrought by the power of Jesus Christ by them invoked. And great grace was upon them all. That is, the apostles were pleasing and acceptable to all. See ch. v. 13. 34. Neither was there. The reason is given why the apostles were so acceptable to all; because they were so liberal and bountiful to all. That lacked. That is, who was destitute of the necessary support of human life. For as many. See our annot. ch. ii. 45. Sold them. That is their lands or farms. 35. And laid them down at the apostles' feet. To wit, according to the custom of those who surrendered anything to the will and disposal of another. From which custom the manner of speaking is taken, Ps. viii. 6. Cicero, speaking of money paid in court, says,' "A hundred pound of gold was paid down in the court before the feet of the praetor." The same author in three of his Offices : " The fishes were cast down before the feet of Pythius." And distribution was made. As much as to say. Whatever was necessary to every one for food, raiment, and physio, was dis- tributed to every particular person, so that in the whole assembly of believers there was none neglected or despised for his poverty, or that appeared to be swelled and puffed up with his riches. 36. And loses. Joses, Josetus, Josephus, and Joseph are one and the same name, with various terminations, as Drusius, Grotius, and others observe. Who was sumamed Barnabas. This surname is a Syriac com- position, from the name Bar and Nabia, or by abridgment Naba, the third person of the future of the verb bia, " to comfort." And thus Barnaba signifieth " the comforting son ;" the Hebrews and Syrians, using often the future for the present participle, as Lud. de Dieu observes. Nor was this surname given him by the common people, but by the apostles themselves, which redounded to his greater praise. The names whicbwere given to the apostles by Christ did not want a happy portending ; nor did they doubtless want the same which were given to others by the apostles, being filled with the Holy Ghost. Neither is it a small honour to be . - ' Oral, pro Flac. 108 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. IV. approved, and well charactered by persons eminent in the church for their divine gifts and piety. Whefefore, all men ought to labour, not so much to be applauded by those most excellent persons (lest it might be looked upon as the effect of ambition) as to deserve those praises, and in the first place, to be a cause of consolation and rejoicing to all pious and holy men, by their piety and singular good deeds. A Levite. We know the Levites had nothing of their own, and therefore the tenths were given them for an inheritance. Num. xviii. 21. We also know that the lands adjoining to the cities given them in possession could not be sold. Lev. xxv. 34. There- fore, the farm that Barnabas sold was some land which some virgin - of another tribe brought either to him or his father in marriage. For, as Grotius observes upon Jer. xxxii. 7, " The women, if they had no brothers, were their parents' heiresses ; and if the next of kin would not marry them, they did marry to others."- And of the country of Cyprus. Cyprus, in the Hebrew, Copher, an island famous for having so many names, as also for its extent, fertility, situation, wealth, colonies, cities, and admission of Christianity, was bounded to the west by the Pampfiilian Sea, to the south by the Egyptian and Syrian, to the east by the Syrian, to the north by the narrow strait of Cilicia, according to Ptolemy ;* by which it seems most probable that it was forced away by nature from Cilicia, rather than from Syria, as Pliny delivers. ^ Anciently it was the seat' of five kingdoms, as the same Pliny testifies.^ But from the time that the Ptolemies obtained the government of Egypt, Cyprus also was reduced under their subjection, by the frequent assistance of the Romans. But when the last Ptolemy, the uncle of Cleopatra, who reigned in Strabo's time, [proved] proud and ungrateful to his allies, the Romans expelled him, took the island into their own possession, and re- duced it into a Pretorian province. The principal cause of its ruin was Publius Claudius Pulcher, who, falling into the hands of the Cilician pirates, then very powerful at sea, and being required to pay his ransom, sent the demands of the pirates to the king, to the end that he should send the money, and redeem him. He sent indeed, but so small a sum that the pirates were ashamed to receive it, and so sending the king his money back again, they set Claudius at liberty, without paying any ransom. Who, being thus ' Lib. V. cap. 14, " Lib. ii. cap. 88. ' Lib. v. cap. 31. YER. I.j LITEKALLT EXPLAINED. 109 freed, was not unmindful of returning the favours he had received from both. So that being made tribune of the people, he obtained that Porcius Cato might be sent to eject the king out of Cyprus. Who hearing of Cato's coming, prevented the ignominy by laying violent hands upon himself. However, Cato taking possession of the island, sold all the king's proper goods and furniture, and sent in the money to the public treasury of the Eomans, which filled the treasury of Rome with a greater mass of money than ever any triumph of her commanders.' From that time the island was made a Pretorian province. Some time after that, Anthony de- livered it to Cleopatra and her sister Arsinoe, but Anthony being overthrown, all his orders were made utterly void, as Strabo testifies, lib. 14. 37. Having land. That is, by marriage. For the Levites had no other lands of their own, except what they had by their wives, as we have observed upon the preceding verse. A memorable example to others is this alienation of his dowry land by Barnabas, not to supply his own, but the wants of others. For a small farm of this nature used to be very highly valued by the pos- sessors, insomuch that they were unwilling to part with it, and they seem to sell their lives to the purchaser that bought it. Therefore, it was a high piece of liberality and charity, to alienate an estate only to gratify others. CHAPTER V. 1. But a certain maji, &c. The particle " but" denotes an opposition, and connects the beginning of this chapter, with the latter part of the foregoing. For Luke there, having declared the liberality of the believers of the church in Jerusalem by that eminent and special instance of Barnabas, who sold his small possession which he enjoyed by way of dowry, and brought the whole price of it to the common stock: he now illustrateth the same by a different, and in some respects, contrary example, and by the divine vengeance pursuing it. As if he should say, But ' Florus, lib. iii. cap. 9. 110 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. V. Ananiaa and Sapphira his wife were otherwise affected, who having sold their possession, kept back part of the price, &c Sold a possession. The Ethiopic renders the Greek word sig- nifying possession, "vine," as also he doth the word signifying " land," in ver. 8 ; likewise the word signifying " field," ch. i. 18 ; the reason is, because most of their possessions in the land of Canaan were vineyards. Hence the seventy render the Hebrew word signifying vineyards, "possessions" and "lands," Prov. xxxi. 16; Hos. ii. 15 ; Joel i. 11 ; 1 Chron. xxvii. 27. 2. And kept back. That is to say. He, through a malicious deceit, saved somewhat by stealth. His wife also being privy to it. Supply, " and willingly ap- proving it." - And brought. Ananias alone, Sapphira his wife being absent. A certain part. Of the price for which he had sold his land. And laid it at the apostles' feet. Dissembling that he had brought the whole sum for which he sold his possession, hoping also that his fraudulent dissimulation should not be known. 3. Why hath Satan filled thine heart ? As much as to say. How oouldst thou persuade thyself to give room in thy -heart to that most inconsiderate and foolish rashness suggested by Satan ? To fill the heartj in scripture phrase, is to make bold ; as Ludovicus de Dieu hath demonstrated, from Esther vii. 5 ; Eocles. viii. 1 1. " Boldness," saith he, " fiUeth the heart, and swells it up with , burning spirits, which breaking out to the external members, especially the tongue, and the hands, drives them on to the most daring attempts ; for a heart full of spirits fears nothing." And the same author a little after saith : " There is a twofold fulness ; one of faith, whereby the heart of believers, being filled with holy spirits, from the most sure promises of God, doth confidently, and - without fear despise all adversity ; the other of boldness, whereby the heart of the profane being filled with rash spirits, proceeding from a vain hope of safety, dares without fear adventure upon any evil." This was Ananias's case here, whose heart the devil had so filled with this spirit of boldness, that very confidently, and without fear, he ventured to lie to the Holy Ghost. To lie to the Holy Ghost. That is to say. That thou should labour to deceive the Holy Ghost ; or, as learned John Piscator explains it, " Us the apostles, in whom the Spirit acteth, and to whom he reveals what is necessary for the edification of the church, by a VER. IV.] LITEKALLY EXPLAINED. Ill figuure called metonymia adjuncti" So also Grotius : " He is said," saith he, " to lie to God, or the Holy Ghost, who hopes that he can deceive the apostles who are instructed by the Holy Ghost." Arvd to keep hack part of the price of the land. That is to say. Laying but a part of the price of the possession sold by you at the apostles' feet, you would in tlie mean time dissemble you laid the whole, thinking your hypocrisy could be hid, and that the apostles, though filled with the Holy Ghost in the day of Pentecost, could in nowise discover the cheat. 4. While it remained, &c. As much aa to say. Was it not in thy power either not to have sold thy possession, or, having sold it, to keep the whole price, or a part of it, to thyself? what then did drive you on thus to obey the devil's persuasions, that having secretly withdrawn part of it, and laying it aside, and laying another part at the apostles' feet, that you by hypocrisy and lying, should dissemble, that you brought the whole, and laid it at the apostles' feet ? Do not think that we who are men, are only mocked with thy deceitful hypocrisy, seeing this mocking tends to the reproach of the Holy Ghost, even as much as if thou hadst intended by thy deceit to mock the Holy Ghost, who is God, seeing we by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost discover the secrets of the hearts. Likewise Paul, after he had said, what precepts he gave to the Thessalonians by the Lord Jesus, and upon what condition God had called them, he adds, 1 Thess. iv. 8 : He there- fore that despiseth these things, despiseth not man but God, who hath also given unto us his Holy Spirit. That is to say, seeing it is he who gave us the Holy Ghost, by whom we are governed, and by whose influence it is evident that we speak. "Men then are opposed to the Holy Ghost; they are also opposed to God; therefore the Holy Ghost is God, ver. 4. For he to whom Ananias chiefly lied, or whom he chiefly endeavoured to deceive, the same is God; but the Holy Ghost is he whom Ananias chiefly endeavoured to deceive, or to whom he lied ; it follows then that the Holy Ghost is God," saith learned Christopher Wittichius, in his learned Book called Causa Spiritus Sancti. Thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God. That is to say, thou hast not endeavoured to deceive men only, but, above all, the Holy Ghost, who is God, and who reveals to us things secret. See such expressions in Exod. xvi. 8; 1 Sam. viii. 7; Luke x. 16; 1 Thess. iv. 8. 112 THE ACT3 OP THU HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. V. 5. And Ananias hearing these words. And not being able to endure, their sharpness, as Origen excellently noteth.^ Fell down, and gave up tlie ghost. Ananias and Sapphira fell dead at Peter's feet, because that mocking the apostles, inspired by the Holy Ghost, they mocked the Holy Ghost, or God himself. So Corah, Dathan, and Abiram, were swallowed up by the earth, because they rose up against Moses, Numb. xvi. And of those children, mentioned 2 Kings il. 24, two she-bears out of the wood destroyed forty and two, not so much for mocking Elisha as bald, as for mocking him being the prophet of the true God. ' Also Elymas for resisting Paul is struck with blindness^ Acts xiii. 11. Now, whether Ananias and Sapphira were by the righteous judgment of God condemned to eternal punishment, seeing scrip- ture is altogether silent, we cannot determine. TertuUian and Ambrose affirm it, Origen and some other fathers deny it ; but we judge it pious ignorance to be willing not to know what God was not willing to make known to us. And great fear came upon, &c. As much as to say, As many as heard that God punished the lying and hypocrisy of Ananias with sudden death, were seized with great reverence to the majesty of God, "that they might very earnestly shun the heinous oflfences so punished. 6. And the young men arose. Supply " who were of lusty bodies," as Apuleius speaks. And carried him out. The Greek word for carried him out, signifies, "they trussed him together," because, as the famous Lightfoot saith, " They not having grave-clothes ready, they trussed the dead body together as well as they could, and having carried him thence, buried him." 7. His wife not knowing what was done. Hence Lightfoot observes the reason why the Greek word "to truss together," is used in the verse preceding. "For if," saith he, "they who carried him out of the room, where he fell down dead, had carried him to his own house or lodging, there to get him a winding sheet, his wife could not be ignorant of what had come to pass; but, (Tvvi(TTsi\av avTov, they bound and trussed him up as he was in his clothes, and so carried him out, and buried him." Came in. That is, where Peter and the rest of the believers were gathered together. ' Tract, viii. upon Matt. TER. XIII.] LITEBALLY EXI'LAINKD. 113 8. Whether ye sold your land for so much. As much as to say. Whether or not did ye sell your possession for any more than that sum of money which your husband gave to us. Yea, for so much^ That is, for no more. 9. How is it, &c. As much as to say. To what end did ye invent this deceit, as if you would put it to trial, whether the Holy Ghost, dwelling in us, and who by us governs the church, did know all things ? God is said to be tempted in scripture, as often as anything is done with an evil conscience ; for then, though it be not so designed and intended, yet the deed itself seems to be as it were of set purpose, to try whether God be just, all-knowing, and omnipotent. Behold, &c. In these words Peter does not imprecate Sap- phira's death, as Porphyrins falsely alleges; but by his gift of prophesying, he foretells the judgment of God that was coming upon her. 10. Then fell she down. That (to wit) the present revenge, executed upon her and her husband, might be an example to others. 11. And great fear came, &c. As much as to say. The whole church, and all who heard the report of this present judgment upon Ananias and Sapphira, were seized with a high reverence of God. See above, ver 5. 12. And by the hands of, the apostles. A Hebrew phrase common in scripture ; that is to say, by the apostles, or the apostles' labour and ministry intervening. Avumg the people. That is, publicly and openly, the people being present and looking on ; and upon many of the people, that they might entice some to the faith, and confirm others in the faith. And they were. All this must be enclosed in a parenthesis till we come to the sixteenth verse, where what now hath been spoken concerning the miracles wrought by the ministry of the apostles is continued. With one accord. That is to say, with " brotherly concord," as Livy speaketh. All. To wit, who were joined to the church. In Sohxmm^s porch. Of which, see above, oh. iii. 11. 13. And of the rest. To wit, who heard the apostles preach, but had not as yet embraced the faith of Christ. 114 THE ACTS or THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. V. Durst no man join himself to them. The Greek hath, "glue himself to them," meaning that none of these hearers durst any- way familiarly converse with the apostles, for the fear which they conceived from the prodigious fate of Ananias and Sapphira, which as yet was fresh in their memory. But the people magnijied them. As much as to sajj Yet that put no stop to the progress of the gospel, because the pec^le had a greater esteem for the apostles. 14. The more, &c. As much as to say, Yea, many of both sexes were daily, more and more, added to the number of the believers, although none of those that were added durst at that time, for fear, be very familiar with the apostles. 15. In beds and couches. Couches, in Latin grabbed, are known to have been little beds, in which the ancients used to rest at noon, and because these couches were easier carried, in them the sick were put when they were to be brought into public, that by a miracle they might be healed. The shadow, &c. " What," saith Baronius,i " is the shadow of Peter but the express image of his body ? And certainly from no other but such images formed from shadows, did the art of painting take its original, that from these you may see that the religious worship of images was in that primitive church first of all con- secrated in Peter's shadow by the special providence of God, working by that shadow so many and so greai miracles." But this Baronius's shadow of reasoning will as soon vanish as we observe, that we nowhere read that even Peter's shadow itself was ever worshipped by those whom by its touch Peter restored to health. " It is perverse and absurd that the image of man should be worshipped by the image of God ; for whatsoever he worshippetb is worse and weaker," saith Lactantius.^ St. Agobard, bishop of Lyons, in the beginning of his book concerning Images: " If," saith he, "the work of God's hands must not be worshipped and adored even to honour God, how much more the works of men's hands are not to be worshipped and adored, even to honour them whose likenesses they are said to be ?" Peter passing by. Who, though he had no greater gift of miracles than the rest had, yet he was made better known than they because he was seen to act and speak when the rest were silent, and seemed to do nothing. > A. D. 34, n. 275. » Lib. ii. Div. Inst. cap. 18. VER. XX. J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 115 And be delivered from th&ir infirmities.^ This is not in the vulgat Greek copies, neither doth the Syrian interpreter read it. 16. ^ multitude out of the cities round about. That is, much people out of the towns lying round about Jerusalem. Vexed with unslmk spirits. That is, wearied, and after a strange manner tormented, with these evil spirits. 17. Then the high priest rose up. As much as to sayj Then went the chief, or prince of the Sanhedrim out, to see what the matter was. And all they that were with him. That is, the rest of those that were of the same sect of religion as the prince of the Sanhedrim was. Which is the sect of the Sadducees. That is, they who adhered to their opinions. The words sect and heresy are of a middle signification. At that same time the Sadducees had the chief authority in the government. As to their tenets in matters of religion, see what we have said, Matt. iii. 7. Were ^lled with indignation. That is, enraged with rash and unruly fury, for that they saw the apostles by their preaching to the people the resurrection of Christ from the dead, did strike at the very root of their heresy ; wherefore the Sadducees thought it for the interest of their cause if by force they could get the apostles and their doctrine suppressed, lest that the people em- bracing the doctrine of the apostles, their authority should be despised, and their heresy exploded. 18. And laid their hands upmi the apostles. That is, they seized them. 20. Go, stand and speak in the temple. That is, preach con- stantly 'and freely to the whole multitude of the people, and to all in common, in the most famous and public place of the city. The words of this life. Which Christ renewed after his death. " There is no need that these words should- breed difficulty to any man,""saith Lightfoot, "if he observe these words in ver. 17j which is the sect of the Sadducees. For, the words of this life, are words which assert this life (to wit, the resurrection), which the Sadducees deny. For the controversy was about the resurrection of Jesus. Heinsius thinks that in these words there is a Hebraism. ' [Latin Vulgate ; Et liberarentur ab infirniitatibus Buia. Cranmer's version of lfi39 reads : Arid that they myght all be ieVyuered from their wfyrmytyes. Wioliffe's version and that of Rheims also pVfe this sentence.] I 2 116 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. T. ' The Hebrew word used for life, r^^n, signifieth,' says he, ' among other things, an assembly or company.' It will appear from what precedes, that here it is spoken either of all the apostles, or most of them, or at least tbeir assemblies. That place, Ps. Ixxiv. 19, is known. Forget not the congregation of thy poor for ever : and before. Deliver not the soul of thy turtle dove to the multitude, where you have twice the Hebrew word n'^n, which the Hellenists in divers places have, diversely rendered. If you consider the word, it signifies life, Ps. Ixviii. 10, Thy congregation hath dwelt therein, where, if you render the Hebrew verbatim, instead of thy congre- gation, or the congregation of thine, you must render thy life. Therefore the words of this life, is the same as the discourse of your company, or conversation." 21. And: when they heard. The divine command given them by the ministry of the angel. Called the council together. That is, the senate of the people, or the great Sanhedrim. And all the senate of the children of Isra£l. That is, the whole senate of the city of Jerusalem. See what we have said above, ch. iv. 5. The word which is rendered senate in the Greek, is in the Hebrew elders. And Hesychius expressly makes the Greek word rendered senate, and the word rendered presbytery, to be one and the same. 24. The high priest. That is, the prince of the Sanhedrim. The captain of the temple. See what we have said above, ch. iv. 1, 6. Chief priests. That is, the heads of the sacerdotal families. See our literal explanation of Matt. ii. 4. Heard these things. To wit, from the officers which they sent to bring the apostles out of prison. Whereunto this would grow. That is, whither it did tend, or what it did mean. 26. Brought them without violence. That is to say, not as they used to drag felons (unwilling to come) to judgment, but after the manner that even honest men sometimes are called to appear in judgment. For they feared. The captain and his servants. The people. To wit, who for the so many and great miracles wrought by the apostles among them, and the favours they who were healed received by them, as also for the singular integrity of their conversations, were highly esteemed by them. TER. XXX.] ■ UTEKALLY EXPLAINED. 117 Lest they should have been stoned. By the people, who took it in ill part that violent hands should be laid upon such holy men, endued with such divine virtue. 28. Did not we straitly command you? That is, we did most strictly, and with most weighty threatenings forbid. That ye should not teach in this name. That is, in the authority of Jesus of Nazareth, whom the rulers of the Sanhedrim hated and despised so exceedingly, that they wsuld not so much as mention his name. And behold. Notwithstanding of all our threatenings. And intend, &c. As much as to say. Yea, also ye intend to stain our reputation with the reproach of an ungodly slaughter ; as if we had unjustly condemned that Jesus of Nazareth to the death of the cross. "The Hebrews," saith Grotius, "express slaughter, the guilt of slaughter, and the punishment of slaughter, by blood." 2&. Th£ other apostles. To wit, who, as his associates, spake the same things with Peter. To obey, &c. To this agreeth that decree of Plato in his Phaedrus, " It is lawful for no man to desert that office to which God hath assigned him." From hence, that we ought to obey God rather than men, Lorinus well inferreth, " That we ought to obey men'&-commands when they do not contradict God, who gave them authority to command." Hence also Bernard says weU,i "Whether God, or man who is God's vicegerent, command- a thing, we are certainly to obey with the same care, and behave with a like reverence, whensoever man commands nothing contrary to God." See what we have noted above, ch. iv. 19. 30. The God of our fathers. That is, the God who entered into covenant with our fathers. Raised up Jesus. This manner of speaking is frequent in scrip- ture, that God raised up prophets, judges, or other ministers, which he was to make use of for some great work. " Which is as much as to say," saith Calvin, "as that the best nature's excellency is weak, except God endue them with peculiar gifts to whom he entrusts any great and noble office." Perhaps this manner of speaking alludes to that notable place of Moses>^I>eut. xviii. 15, which Peter cited above in his first sermon, ch. iii. 22. Whom ye slew, and hanged upon a tree. That is, whom ye put * Lib. De Frscep. & Disp. cap. 12. 118 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [OHAP. V. to a shameful death upon the cross. In allusion to that pl^ce, Deut. xxi. 22, 23. 31. Him hath God exalted a Prince, and a Saviour. There is an ellipsis here of the preposition in, so that the sense may l^e, that Christ, whom you have condemned to be shamefully hanged, him hath God exalted to be a Prince and a Saviour, or hath constituted in the supreme degree of honour, that he might be more fully and perfectly the Prince of life, to wit, eternal, and the Captain of salvation. See above, eh. iii. 15 ; Heb. ii. 10, v, 9. With his right hand. That by the right hand of God here, being a metaphorical expression, is understood his power and great virtue, is clear unto aU. "If ever since the creation God did manifest it, surely it was in this work of Chrjgt's exaltation. Whence Paul dpth deservedly celebrate it in these words: And what is the e:^ceeding greatness of his power to us-%eard loho believe, according to the working of his mighty power which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in heavenly places, Eph. i. 19, 20. For what can be conceived more noble than to endow with immortality a man that was born like other men, subject also to the same infirmities with them, except only sin, and then set him above all the heavenSj and to put all things under his feetj as Well in heaven as in earth, that he might govern and manage them at his pleasure ? For it appears by the circumstances, that all these things are compre- hended under Christ's ascension and exaltation to heaven, and not a mere lifting up to heaven, sucb as was Epoch's before the lq,w, and Elias's under the law, who neither died before they were lifted- up, nor attained to any dominion after. For these, although they' were preludes and types of Christ's ascension, as of oprs also, yet were they infinitely short of it." ^ To give, &c. As much as to say, that gf his great mercy he might bring his people to repentance ; and by forgiveness of sin, which follows repentance quickened by faith, reconcile them to himself, Calvin saith well, "Eepentance is indeed a voluntary conversion. But whence cometh this willingness, except th^t God change our heart, that of stony it may become fleshy; of hard and stubborn, tractable ; and, lastly, of crooked, straight ? But this is done when Christ by his Spirit renews us ; neither is this the gift of one moment, but must be daily increased all our life, * Curcgl. Instit. lib. v. pap, 16, n, 16. VBU. XXXIl.] LITEEALLY EXPLAINED. 119 till we fully adhere to God, whicli will be at last, when we shall have put off our flesh. It is indeed a beginning of repentance when a man who first was averse from God, renouncing the world and himself, begins a new life. But because (though once upon the way) we are far from the mark, we must daily be advancing. Both which we obtain by Christ. For even as he beginneth repentance in us, so he gives us perseverance. This is indeed an inestimable grace; but it would profit little unless joined with remssioa of sins. For Christ firgt found us enemies to Goi and the corruptions which make the dissension between him and us do always stick to us, so that he might jiistly be displeased, with us rather than favourable to us. But justification consists in this, if God impute not our sins to us. Therefore this latter grace ought never to be separated from the former. Yea, the gospel will be lame and corrupt, unless it consist of these two members : that is, unless men be taught that they are reconciled to God by Christ, by the free imputation of his righteousness, and by the new birth of his Spirit transformed to newness of life, Thus we have, in short, how salvation is to be obtained in Christ." .32. And we are his witnesses of these things. As much as to say. Now it becomes us not upon any account to suppress these things which I have gpoken, seeing we are constituted witnesses pf them, and so by virtue of our office are bound to pjibliah and proclaim them openly to all. See above, ch. i. 8 ; Luke xxiv. 48 ; John XV. 27. The Greek hath words here for things, but the sense is the same ; for by words Peter understands things themselves, aftcf the Hebrew manner of spea,king : to wit, those things of which he briefly spake before, that is, whatever respecteth the dignity and office of Christ, or man's salvation depending thereon. And so is also the Holy Gliost. As much as to say, Nor indeed do we the apostles only witness these things, but also the Holy Ghost himself, who is a witness beyond exception, to whom by right ye are bound to assent, however ye refuse to give credit to us. The apostles alone for integrity and innocency of life were worth credit ; but lest the stubbornness of men might leave any pretext to cloak their unbelief, God would add to this testimony another greater, to wit, the testimony of his Spirit. This very testimony of the Spirit is joined elsewhere with the testimony of the apostles, John xv. 26, 27 ; Heb, ii. 3, 4 ; but we must not think that the Holy Spirit did bear witness apart from the 120 THE ACTS OT THE HOLY APOSTLES [OHAP. V. apostles, but by the apostles ; to wit, by their miracles and divine discourses proceeding from his inspiration. Such an inspiration also did at that time most evidently manifest itself in the apostles, while with such readiness of mind they spoke of so wonderful things, no ways fearing the power or threatenings of the great men. After the like manner it is said, Eev. xxii. 17, And the Spirit and the bride say. Come. That is, the Bride inspired by the Spirit saith, Come. Whom God hath given. That is, the gifts of which Holy Spirit God hath given largely and plentifully. To all that obey him. To wit, Christ ; that is, to all that believe in Christ, and endeavour to frame their conversation hereafter according to the rule of his word. 33. They were cut to the very heart. That is, they were ragingly angry. The Greek word here, StsTrpiovro, and also ch. vii. 54, saith Hesychius, is, " They raged with anger, they were very angry." Took counsel to slay them. That is, they consulted among them- selves to. kill the apostles, who were personally present, and took notice fif it. 34. A J Pharisee. The sect of the Pharisees was in greatest esteem- among the Jews, and was gentler than the rest in punishing. Gamaliel, a doctor of the law. Or a public professor. Concern- ing this judge of the great Sanhedrim, Lightfoot saith thus: "Eabban Gamaliel the first, called commonly and for distinction, Rabban Gamaliel the old, was Praeses of the Sanhedrim, after his father, Rabban Simeon, the son of Hillel, [and] Paul's master, and the thirty-fifth receiver ofthe traditions, and therefore for this reason might well be called doctor of the law, as being keeper and conveyer of the traditions received at Mount Sinai, were it not that the rabbins of the inferior order enjoyed the same title. He died eighteen years before the destruction of the city, and Rabbi Simeon, his son, took his chair, who perished with the city." Commanded to put forth the apostles a little space. That is, he commanded them to retire a little out of the council, lest by his words they might become bolder. 35. Take heed, &c. As much as to say, do not act with such a great heat, but rather have a special care, lest in your preposterous zeal you may do somewhat to these men in this business whereof afterward you may repent. It is not probable to me that Gamaliel VEE. XXXV. 3 LIlliaALLY EXPLAINED. 12l spake ttus as if lie approved the doctrine of the gospel, or would undertake its defence, but seeing all the rest stirred up with fury, being a gentle and moderate man, he by his discourse moderates their excess. "In the meantime," saith Capellus, "his disciple Paul most cruelly raged against the church of Christ, and wasted it, and Maimonides' attributes a fact to Gamaliel far different (as it seems) from this advice, for he saith, that when he saw heretics so abound in his days (meaning Christians, there being none other at that time among the Jews' that might be supposed to have been so called), he composed a form of prayer, in which God was requested to extirpate the heretics, which form he put with the other forms of prayer in the Jewish liturgy then used, that it might be ready in every one's mouth. If this fact be true, it seems to argue such an enraged spirit against the Christians, and hatred at the Christian religion, to have been in this man, as suits not well with this advice of his, which Luke gives here an account of; except that one would think to reconcile Maimonides and Luke by saying this was Gamaliel's mind and judgment, that although the apostles and their followers were heretics, and even dangerous, yet they were not to be suppressed by human violence, nor the counsels of human policy, but the whole of it should be committed to the wise providence of God, that their rooting out must be looked for from God, and not hastened by human con- trivances, and therefore that for this purpose he composed that prayer, and added it to the rest in the daily liturgy, whereby God was besought to root out these men if they were ungodly and heretics ; that if they were not from God, he himself would in a way and manner most agreeable to his own providence and wisdom disappoint and overturn their designs. As to Paul, Gamaliel's disciple, that bitter persecutor of the church of Christ, two things may be answered, to wit, that Gamaliel himself was indeed at first of the same disposition with Paul against the apostles and their followers, which was cruel and fierce, but that then he had changed his thoughts, God having inclined his heart to milder courses, which often comes to pass, or that afterwards Paul dissented from his master, as being of a hotter temper, and there- fore of a more angry and' hostile spirit against those who he thought would overturn the Jewish religion received from their fathers, for which he was a great zealot." ^ In Sum. falm. lib. ii. Tract, de Orat. & Bened. Sacerdot. 122 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. V. 36, For before these days rose up Theudas. Theudas is not a Greek, but the Hebrew name min, which the Syrians pronounce by a dipthong Theuda, as they call Thomas, Thaumas, and Joseph, Jauseph, as Grotius noted, " Luke," saith Henry Valesius,* " or rather Gamaliel in Xiuke, saith expressly that Theudas rose up but very l^itely, yea, in these same days wherein he spake. For before these days rose up Thmdas, which words demonstrate the thing to have been done very lately, for so both Greeks and Latins use to speak of a thing lately fallen out, as may be proved by many instances. For before these days, then, is as much as in these days, for the Greeks and Latins say, before the third day of the kalends, for the third day of the kalends, Wherefore when Luke subjoins, after this man rose up Judas, nothing else is meant by it than that Theudas was older than Judas the Galilean. Which gloss, though at first it seems somewhat hard, yet it is altogether necessary, and most true, neither does it want examples, fpr as often as we reckon from the last, which is nearer us, we must make the first last, and the last first. For that reason TertulHan, in his Apologetic, hath used the word retro, to say " a good while ago," in times past ; and retrosior, for "ancienter," and nevertheless retrd in Latin is the same as post, " afterward." " But because Casaubon denies that ever the Greeks spake so, we produce a witness beyond all exception, which is Clemens Alexandrinus,2 who spea,ks in the very same manner that Luke does; for having observed almost all the heretics to have broken out about the time of Hadrian, and to have come even to the reign of Antoninus Pius, as Basihdes and Valentine, he subjoins, 'for Marcion lived about the same time with Basilides and Valeur tine, but he, as the elder, was conversing with themj being yet young.' He adds then, 'After whom, Simon for a while heard Peter preach.' Who sees not in this place of Qlemens, that 'after whom,' is the same with ' before whom ?' For neither was Siinon the Sorcerer after Marcion, but rather lived long before him, as is constant among aU. But certainly Clemens, while he makes a catalogue of heretics, reckoned them first who were the last, and put Simon the last of all. But also geographers describing the situation of lands and names of people, speak after the same manner: for they say, after these are those, that is, above these 1 Upon Euseb. book ii. ch. ] 1. » In lib. vii. Strom, towards the end. VEE. XXXVI.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 123 those are placed. And so much against Casaubon's opinion,* whp thought that Theudas, of ^hom mention is made in the Acts, to have been older than Judas. But one will perhaps say, that from what we have argued, it seems to be abundantly evinoed that Theudas was not older than Judas of Galilee; yet nevertheless that Theudas, whereof Luke speaks, must be distinguished from that Theudas mentioned by Josephus, 20th book of his Antiq., toward the end of ch. 2. ; for the first Theudas, of whom Gamaliel speaks in that oration which he had in the Jewish council, did raise a tumult in Judea about the time of Christ's passion. But the other, of whom Josephus speaks, stirred up sedition after the death of King Agrippa, while Cuspius Fadus governed Judea, about the fourth year of the reign of Claudius Augustus, Seeing, then, that Gamaliel had this speech a little after Christ's resur- rection, and before Stephen's martyrdom, that is, about the latter end of Tiberius's reign, he could not at all have spoken then of that commotion which Theudas made while Claudius reigned. We cannot meet this objection any other way, unless we say that Josephus was mistaken in making Theudas's sedition later thaa he ought. For that there were two Theudases, who feigned themselves prophets, one after another, stirring up the Jews to hope for new things, I can no ways be persuaded. Liet Ijukei and Josephus be compared, where both of them speak of Theudas, and it will plainly appear that they both meant one and the same man. Certainly all circumstances agree so exactly in both narratives, that Josephus seems to have commented upon Luke. One differ- ence there is as to the time, which yet is not of such moment that we should invent two Theudases ; for if as often as we meet with such differences in the narratives of ancient writers, we would distinguish persons and things, we must beware, lest unadvisedly we make two men of one. How much more safe is it, when we find two writers differing among themselves, to say that one of them is in a mistake, which since it is wicked to affirm of the scripture, the whole blame must be laid upon Josephus." Light- foot saith,'' "Admit only that Josephus errs in computing the times, and the whole difficulty is removed. And truly, I see not upon what account we owe that reverence and modesty to Josephus, as to wrestle so much for his reputation. Another Theudas must be found out, or the pointing of commas altered, ' Exercitat. 2. cap. 18. * In Horis Heb, 124 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. V. or some other, I know not what, absurd plaster must be applied, rather than Josephus must be accused of a mistake, who yet is found often to trip and reel both in history and chronology. I would therefore think Josephus's Theudas to be tramaliel's, but that Josephus, mistaking the time, stained a true history with -false chronology." ' Saying he was somebody. That is, boasting himself to be -some great and eminent deliverer of the Jews from the servitude, with which the Romans oppressed them. This history Josephus relates thus,' (and after him Eusebius.^) While Cuspius Fadus governed Judea, a certain juggler named Theudas, having gathered together a great multitude of men, persuaded them to carry away their goods, and follow him as their captain to the river Jordan, and being, as he himself said, a prophet, made them believe by his power he would divide the water, and so they might have easy passage. By such speeches he deceived many. But shortly after Fadus suppressed their madness, having sent some troops of horse against them, who having suddenly surprised them, killed some, and took others prisoners. Theudas himself was also taken by them, whose head they cut off and carried to Jerusalem. And brought to nought. That is, all their endeavours vanished. 37. After this man. These words are the same with " before this man," as we showed in the verse immediately preceding 'out of Valesius's notes upon Eusebius. Rose up Judas of Galilee. Of him Josephus saith thus,* (and out of him Eusebius *) : Judas the Gaulanite, born in the town of Gamala, having joined one Saddock a pharisee in his society, stirred up the people to revolt ; both of them saying that the tax was nothing but a mark of manifest bondage ; and encouraged the whole nation to defend their liberties. The same in the second book of the Jewish Wars, c. 7. " At that time a certain Galilean, named Judas, stirred up the inhabitants to revoltj openly up- braiding them, that they should thus endure to pay tribute to the Romans, and own, besides God, some mortal men to be lords over them," The same Josephus calls ^ this Judas the Gaulanite, Judas the Galilean. Perhaps he was commonly believed thus, because that in Galilee he chiefly stirred up his tumults, though Gaulan and Gamala belonged not to Galilee, but to Perea, or the region beyond Jordan. 1 Antiq. XX. 2. » Hist. lib. ii. cap. 1 1. a ^nt. xviii. 1. * Hist. i. S. ^ Antiq. xviii. 2. TER. XXXVII.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 125 In the days of the taxing. That Is, while Publius Sulpitius Quirinius, or Cyrenius, taxed Judea. Scaliger (saith Valesius) saith,' " That Luke speaks not here of the first taxing, under which Christ was born, but of the second, which was made after Archelaus's banishment ; and sharply reproves Eusebius for con- founding these two taxings among themselves. But Scaliger himself is very greatly mistaken ; who being seconded by no author, would obtrude two taxings upon us, while both Josephus and Luke himself avouch there was but one. For Luke saith not of the second taxing, but only of the taxing : intimating that there was but one taxing. Origen also, in his first book against Celsus, agreeth with Eusebius, in these words : ' After him, in the days of the taxing, at which time Jesus was born, Judas a certain Gali- lean nlade many of the people to revolt to him.' Therefore Scaliger's censure must attaint Origen, for he aflBrmed the same that Eusebius did. For Origen distinguished not two taxings of Judea. Moreover, Eusebius agreeth very well with himself, for that having followed evangelic authority, he made that taxing of Quirinius to fall about the birth of Christ, it follows that he should apply the insurrection of Judas the Galilean to the same time, wherein, indeed, he difiers from Josephus, but agreeth exceeding well with Luke and with himself. If so be that any will choose to embrace our opinion, there shall no difference be found- between Luke and Josephus. For we say that the taxing at the time Christ was born, began when Herod reigned in Judea, and that it was ended by Quirinius, when Archelaus, Herod's son, waa banished. In which very time we say that Judas's insur- rection fell out in Judea, to wit, after Archelaus's banishment. Surely, before Archelaus's being deposed, there was no ground why Judas should stir up the people to revolt; for that the Koman magistrate would not tax there, where the king was a friend, and an ally of the people of Rome ; neither were the Jews in any hazard of being slaves to foreigners, while they had a king of their nation and religion. Whence it appears, that the taxing and insurrection of Judas the Galilean, could not fall out till after Archelaus's banishment." Thus far Valesius in his notes upon Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History, book i. ch. 5. The same Valesius, in the same place a little before: "Josephus," saith he, "does indeed mention the taxing made by Quirinius in Syria ' Lib. vi. de Emen. Temp, and in Anim. in Euseb, 126 THE ACTS OF THB HOLY APOSTLES [OHAP. T. and Judea, as soon as Archelaus was banished. But he speaks not of this taxing, which Luke in his gospel says, ch. ii. 1, 2, was made, when Herod was yet reigning. But indeed it seems to me that an error hath crept into Luke's text in Quirinius's fiame> and that for Quirinius the name of Sentius Saturninus ought to be restored. For this man, as Josephus testifieth, was governor about the latter end of Herod's reign. TertuUian also writeth,* that Judea was taxed by Sentius Saturninus. Whence it appears, that in TertuUian's time, some have read in Luke's gospel Satur- ninus for Quirinius. Besides, it is strange tha;t Josephus should have pretermitted the first taxing, who yet was so accurate in prosecuting the history of his. nation, that he reckons all the governors of Syria; for he mentioneth both Sentius Saturninus and Quintilius Yarus his successor. When Eusebius understood this, it was his judgment that it was the same taxing that Luke and Josephus mentioned ; but that Josephus was mistaken^ who thought this taxing to have happened after ArChelaus's banish- ment. Therefore the same Eusebius^ placeth that tumult of Judas the Galilean, which followed upon the taxing made by Quirinius, about the time of Christ's birth, and the end of Herod's reign. Neither was Eusebius so stupid as not to see Luke and Josephus to disagree among themselves in setting down the time of this taxing, ,it being evident even to the blind. But in this discord he for respect to the gospel, chose to disbelieve Josephus, and to follow Luke, which opinion is indeed far more likely and probable than that of Scaliger, who thinketh there were two taxings of Judea both made by Quirinius. But in this opinion of Scaliger's, many things not very probable do occur. Firstj it behoved Quirinius to have been twice sent to Syria for one and the same purpose, to wit^ to tax. First> about the time of Christ's birth, then about ten years after. But it is not probable that one man should be twice sent to govern a province. It is certain that Josephus, that accurate historian, when he mentions Quirinius's coming to Syria and Judea, saith not that ever he came to Syria before, or that any taxing was biefore that time made either by him or any other Boman judge. But if the taxing had been made already, why is it done again by the same man ? for if it had been rightly made, and without fraud, it was no ways necessary it should be done again ; but if not well, justly it behoved to send ^ Lib. iv., contra Mareion. cap. 19. ' In Chronico. VEB. XXXVII.]- LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 127 another who should make a more just taxing. Further, how could that former taxing be made by a Roman magistrate, while Herod reigned, seeing that the senate had declared Herod to be king of Judea by an undoubted right ; neither had the Roman magistrate a right to act anything by authority in Judea, so long as king Herod lived. I pass by, that in the last days of Herod, wherein Christ was born, Saturninus and Varus, but not jQuirinius, were Caasar's deputies in Syria. These be the arguments whereby I am chiefly inclined to think Scaliger's opinion not probable, who argues for two taxings. Neither doth it withstand that Luke saith, that the taxing which was made a little before Christ was born was the first, for by it is only meant that this was the first time wherein the Romans taxed Judea, neither 'was there ever any taxing before. It is also false what Scaliger saith, that the latter taxing belonged to Axchelaus's tetrarchy, and was for his goods only. Yea, Josephus saith expressly^ that Quirinius was sent by Ca3sar to tax throughout Syria and Judea. Petavius followed Scaliger's opinion,^ to which he adds this only, that both these taxings were made by Quirinius, being sent with an extraordinary power to Syria. But both Luke and Josephus, their words refelthis; for Luke saith. When Cyrenius was governor of Syria, and Josephus hath : 'To do justice among the people ;' which cannot be said but of the ordinary governor. Casaubon, in his Exercitations, takes the same course to reconcile Josephus and Luke. But indeed in my judgment all of them have lost their labour, for oiie of them must needs be in a mistake, which, since it is heinous to say of the evangelist, it is safer>to lay the cause of the mistake upon the Jewish writer. Which, if it seem somewhat harsh to any, there remains yet this one way of reconciling them, which we mentioned already, that in Luke's text we restore Saturninus instead of Quirinius, and that we say the taxing in his time was made, not by the Roman governor, but by King Herod himself. It might also be said that this taxing M'as indeed finished and perfected, when Quirinius was governor after Archelaus's banish- ment; yet it began long before, towards the end of Herod's reign, at which time Christ was born. Thus also the difference that appears between Luke and Josephus is taken away. By this means Luke and Josephus agree excellently well togiether, for the evangelist calls that taxing which began to be made about the * In fine 17 Ant. and init. 18. ' In Rat. Temp. 128 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLUS [CHAP. V. time of Christ's birth, Herod being yet alive, the taxing of the governor Quirinius, because it ended at length under Quirinius. This, indeed, ia my opinion is the fittest interpretation of that gospel text in Luke, being such as supposeth only one taxing to have been made, not two : as Scaliger, and others following his opinion, contrary to the faith of history, have devised." Thus far the learned Valesius. Drew away much people. That is, made many df the people revolt from the Romans. After him. That is, to him. . He also perished. As much as to say, saith Origen, ' " Who after he was punished himself, his doctrine also was overthrown, except some few remainders." 38. Refrain from these men. That is. Have nothing to do with them, as Matt, xxvii. 19. Of men. That is, of men's devising. And let them alone. To this word must be joined that part of the verse immediately following, Lest haply ye be found even to fight against Qod. For if this council, &c. The construction requires that these words and the following, till the fore-cited part of the next verse. Lest haply ye he found, &c., should be enclosed between two parentheses. It will come to nought. That is, it is not so firm as that it can stand, 39. Ye cannot overthrow it. That is, ye wUl labour in vain to overthrow it, forasmuch as whatever is of God must stand in spite of all men. BuUinger in his commentaries upon this place, highly extols this counsel of Gamaliel's. But if we believe Calvin, " Gamaliel drew a perverse consequence from true principles, because that which only should be applied to faith, he does mis- apply to outward duty and way of acting. And so he not only overthrows all political order, but also he enervates the discipline of the church." Castellio, in his Vatican, answereth Calvin thus : " Seeing the business was about a matter of religion, which was yet then in controversy, and not about any crime expressly for- bidden by the law, Gamaliel could not, though he had been a Christian, have given the Jews a better advice. First, his reason was true ; if it was not from God, it would fall of itself, according. ' Lib. i, cont. Cels. VER. XXXIX.] LITEKALIA EXPLAINED. 129 to that of Christ : Every plant which my heavenly Father hath not planted shall be plucked up : let them alone, &c., Matt. xv. 13. And of David, who would not kill Saul when he might, 1 Sam. xxiv. 6. Also the examples which Gamaliel produceth are true. Now whereas Gamaliel feared that they should fight against God, that came afterward to pass ; which, if they had followed his advice, had never been." And a little after, " Whereas Calvin saith that this advice of Gamaliel's is such as would overthrow all political order, and enervate church discipline, he saith not true; for the dis- cipline of the apostles was not quite without nerves, though it had no such nerves as Calvin speaks. Also political order is in force in sins that are certain, and without, controversy. In the law of Moses the seventy elders judged in smaller and more easy causes, and brought the more hard and difficult to Moses, and he consulted with God concerning them. So may it also be done now. Adultery, manslaughter, false witness, and other certain and known crimes, may without hazard be judged. But for heretics the matter is controverted (for if it were not controverted, it would not be debated any more than murder), and therefore to be referred to the oracle. Therefore as Moses waited the time of the oracle, and yet did not in the meanwhile overthrow the political order, so we are to wait the time of God's judgment, which will be a certain oracle in this controversy. Yet God in the meantime will make use of the service of his ministers in things not controverted." These are Castellio's words, with which agree these choice words of the sermon preached before the House of Lords, on -Nov. 5th, 1680 : " Of societies of men. Christians of all others are mostj" averse from ways of violence and blood, especially from using any such ways upon the account of religion : and among Christian churches, where they differ among themselves, if either of them use these ways upon the account of religion, they give a strong presumption against themselves that they are not truly Christians." Thus far the Right Reverend Bishop of St. Asaph, William Lloyd, a man of excellent parts, great erudition, singular piety and be- nignity, to whom I do, and shall all my lifetime acknowledge myself to be extremely bound. " We do not," says Gregory Nazianzen,' "brand our enemies with reproaches as many do, covering the weakness of their reasons and arguments with foul language, as is said of the cuttle fish, that it vomits its ink in the water to escape ' Orat. 32' K 130 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. T. the fisher, but we make it appear by this infallible proof that we fight for Christ, because we fight with meekness and humility, as Christ did." Salvianus, a presbyter of Marseilles, speaking of the Arians,' whose heresy every orthodox man abhors : " They are heretics," says he, " but they do not know it. They are heretics with us, but with themselves they are not such ; for they so far judge themselves Catholics, that they defame ourselves with the brand of heretical overthwartedness. What therefore they are to us, we are the same to them. The truth is with us, but they pre- sume it be with themselves. God's honour is with us, but they think that what they believe is for his honour. They are ungodly, but this they think to be true godliness. They err, but they err with a good intention, thinking that they both honour and love God. Though they have not an orthodox faith, yet they think it to be a perfect love of God, and how they shall be punished for this heterodox error in the day of judgment, none can know except the Judge. In the meantime, God, as I think, therefore lengthens his patience to them, because he sees, that although they believe not aright, yet they do err only out of love to a judgment which they suppose to be religious." 40. And to him they agreed. To wit, that they should not kill the apostles ; but not that they should send them away untouched; which yet was fit and agreeable to what Gamaliel spoke. And when they had called, &c. As much as to say, when they had called in the apostles, whom before they commanded to go aside, or be carried out of the council, and lest the council should seem to assemble against them as innocents, and guilty of no crime, they punished them with that judicial punishment of forty stripes, enjoined Deut. xxv. 2, 3, which was inflicted upon the disobedient, and was commonly called by the Hebrews, 'a striking.' The Jews, by the Romans' permission, had power to correct their own in Judea and some neighbouring places, even with strokes. They commanded, &c. As much as to say, they strictly forbade them, that they should not henceforth preach the gospel of Christ, and that they should speak nothing to any man that tended to the praise of Jesus of Nazareth. 41. And they. To wit, the apostles, were dismissed by the San- hedrim, after being basely beaten, as Christ foretold, also remem- bering his command. Matt. x. 17, 21, 35 ; xxiii. 34; Mark xii. 5 ; xiii. 9; Luke xii. 11 ; Matt. v. 11, 12; Luke vi. 22, 23. ' Lib. V. De Provici. VER. XLII.] LITJSRALLY EXPLAINED. 131 Departed from the presence of the council ryoicing. By these words is meant, that the apostles did with so much constancy of mind endure these persecutions, that they not only did not complain, but also greatly rejoiced. The most pious, and eminent for learning. Dr. J. Sharp, Dean of Norwich, who formerly, by his own beneficence, and the liberality of the Eight Hon. Lord Heneage Finch, late high chancellor of England, did frequently and largely supply my wants, in that famous sermon made before the lord mayor and aldermen of the city of London, upon Michaelmas day, a.d. 1680, saith most truly and elegantly of the just man : " Let what will happen to him, he is full of peace and joy, for he hath met with no disap- pointment of his designs. His great aim was to please God ; and his conscience from God's word assures him that he hath done it, and he hath nothing to do further, but to wait for the happy time, when the secrets of all hearts will be revealed, and every man's conscience and actions will be made manifest, and then he doubts not to receive approbation and praise, and a great reward in that day of the Lord Jesus ; and so much the rather, because this light affliction wherewith he is now exercised, he is assured, will work for him a fiir more exceeding and eternal weight of glory, 2 Cor. iv. 17." That they were, &c. As much as to say, that they had this sin- gular proof of the grace of God, to be afflicted for Christ's sake, and the propagating of his kingdom, Phil. i. 16. " Here," saith Calvin, " the cause should be respected which associates us with the Son of God, who not only with his glory swallowed up the dishonour of the world, but turned its reproaches, mockeries, and abuses to a great honour. 42. And daily, &c. As much as to say, but the apostles, relying upon the protection of Christ, nowise frighted with the adversaries' threats or punishments did, contrary to the unjust prohibition of the Sanhedrim, preach the gospel of Christ, not only sometimes, but daily, not only from house to house, that is privately in every house, but also publicly in the most famous place of the city, the temple. " He," saith Calvin,, " that accounts himself happy when he suffers for Christ, let him never faint, though he should undergo hard trials. For the apostles were in a manner armed with stripes, that without fear they might hasten to death. Woe therefore to our wantonness, who, as soon as we have suffered the least persecution, like soldiers discharged from service, presently surrender the torch to others." K 2 132 TpE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. VI. CHAPTER VL 1. The number of the disciples. That is, of sueh as believed in Christ; and so the church's wealth increasing, her affairs increased also. Multiplied. To wit, daily in Jerusalem. There arose a murmuring. As it ordinarily happens in a great multitude. Of the Grecians. The Greek text hath Hellenists. The holy writers of the New Testament did call all Gentiles by the name of Hellenes, when religion was treated of. And so I am apt to think that they were called Hellenists, who either themselves, or their forefathers, having been addicted to the superstition of the Gentiles, were, being proselyted, engrafted into the Jewish nation- Against the Hebrews. They seem to be called Hebrews here, that were sprung from the Jews' line. Clemens Alexandrinus and Chrysostom call them, " Hebrews from the very first original." Were neglected. That is, were not enough supplied. To wit, the Hellenist's widows, who were either sick or burdened with children, were worse entertained than the Hebrew widows were, in their daily distributions of necessaries for food and raiment. Salmasius saith, that the cause of this murmuring made by the Hellenists, was : " That they lamented their widows to be passed by in the daily ministration, because doubtless the Jewish women were chosen, and taken to that office." The Ethiopic rendered it, "Because they saw their widows serve daily. It seems, the despising of the Hellenist's widows consisted in this, that the daily labour of serving the poor was laid upon them. 2. Then the twelve called the multitude of the disciples. That is. The apostles convened the whole flock of believers in Christ, that in such a multitude there might be enough, out of which the deacons might be chosen, and that the election might be by the votes of the whole church. And said. To wit, to the whole congregation of the disciples, or believers. It is not reason. That is, it is neither convenient nor expedient. That we should leave the word of God. That is, be less taken up in propagating the doctrine of the gospel. VKR. v.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 133 And serve tables. That is, That we should apply ourselves to the care of serving the poor among believers in bodily necessaries. Here is a figure called synecdoche, expressing the thing containing for the thing contained, tables, for the meat and drink used to be laid on tables. Also of the part for the whole ; that is, even for every thing else besides meat and drink that belonged to bodily sustenance. And so, to serve tables is the same as to look after things necessary to maintain the bodily life. 3. Look ye out. That is, advisedly choose. Men of honest report. That is, whose faith and uprightness is unquestionable. Full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom. That is, abundantly furnished with spiritual wisdom, or wisdom proceeding from the Holy Ghost. Whom we may appoint over this business. That is, whom we may appoint to take care of the poor, as the oflScers among the Jews called Parnesim in each synagogue. See Lightfoot's Horas Hebraicae, in Matt. iv. 23. But we, &c. As much as to say, we, being liberate from this care of overseeing the poor among the faithful, in things pertaining to the bodily life, may with all care attend our office, either pro- nouncing what the church must say after us in public prayers to God, or instructing the people. 5. And the saying pleased, &c. As much as to say. And so, by the advice of the apostles, were seven stewards chosen by the common consent of the whole church, to take the care of tTie poor, and of distributing the church's money. Their names were Stephen, Philip, Prochorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and Nicolas a stranger, or proselyte of Antioeh. From their Greek names it appears that in this election chief respect was had to the Hellenists. The first church of Christ was made up of Jews only, none of the Gentiles being as yet either called or admitted to it. It consisted of two sorts, to wit, Hebrews, who were such from their first original, and of Hellenists, who in respect of their lineage and nation, were Greeks, that is. Gentiles, but by circum- cision-were incorporated into the Jewish nation. ," The first seven deacons of the church," saith Salmasius, " were chosen out of the number of the Hellenists, who were all of them, except one, born at Jerusalem. And seeing the Hellenists were proselytes, and six of them bom at Jerusalem, Luke reckons the seventh last, 134 THE ACTS OF THB HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. TI. whom he telleth us was a proselyte of Aiitioch. If it were simply read in Luke, 'and Nicolas a proselyte,' it would be nowise doubted but we should understand the other six to have been Jews, and not proselytes, but since he adds a proselyte of Atitioch, who can doubt but that the rest'were likewise proselytes, though not of Antioch, but of Jerusalem ? for these things came to pass in Jerusalem." 6. Whom they set before the apostlesi To wit, that by their authority and blessing they might be confirmed. And when they had prayed, they laid their hands on them. Here the form of election is set forth, which was also in the primitive institution of the church used in making bishops, or presbyters. The church presented men of great wisdom and piety to the apostles or their delegates, who were greatly endued with a spirit of discerning, to be ordained, who, after having tried them, prayed to God that he would bless them in the new oiEce to which they were appointed, and ^endue them with such wisdom, as they might with great success manage the same. Those prayers being ended, they laid hands on them, in token of the ministries being com- mitted to them. Sometimes also the Holy Ghost did by the prophets point out by name such as he would have chosen to this or that ministry. Acts xiii. 2 ; 1 Tim. i. 18 ; iv. 14. 7. And the word, &c. As much as to say. Such was the power of the Holy Ghost speaking by the apostles and working miracles, that every day many, and among them some even of the priests in Jerusalem, which Christ's own preaching did not bring in to embrace, at least to profess the faith, did now (having overcome all respect to carnal fear and vain-glory) adjoin themselves, to the number of the believers, and obeyed the precepts of faith, or doctrine of the gospel. 8. Full of faith and power. That is, eminent for the faith and virtue of miracles. This, manner of speaking is not unusual in scripture, to say they are fuU of the gifts of God, in which the strength and grace of the Spirit doth notably discover and show itself. 9. There arose. By rising, Luke means those of whom he speaks to have opposed the doctrine of the gospel; not to have dragged Stephen presently to judgment, but to have first debated with him concerning the religion he taught. These opposers of Stephen were either Hellenists, or strangers, who lived in Jerusalem, "VEE. IX. J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 135 either about their affairs or for studying. The Jews tell us there were four hundred and eighty synagogues in Jerusalem. Of the Libertines. Suidas : " Libertines, the name of a nation." Moreover, In the first collation of Carthage' is mentioned one Victor, bishop of the church of Libertina in Africa or Numjdla. The learned Junius suspects some corruption to have been made in the letters of the word Libertines ; for he notes, that they were those strangers who, as Epiphanius witnesseth, called holy houses Ubrathas, 2t,nA the parishes belonging to it, with the whole convent, lahras; "for," saith he, "all these belonging to one synagogue were called lebratkenun, and from thence corruptly the synagogue was called the synagogue of the Libertines." And Cyrenians. What Cyrene was, whence they were called Cyrenians, see pur literal explication on Matt xxvii. 33, and Amos ix. 7. Josephus testifies ^ that there were many Jews in Cyrenia. And Alexandrians. Alexandria the metropolis of Egypt, whence these Alexandrians came, was built by Alexander, from whom it took its name. Ptolemy Philadelphus adorned it with a library of seventy thousand volumes; but men famous for learning and wisdom, who were its inhabitants, were a greater ornament to it. Among which were renowned Philo the Jew, of whom was that proverb, "Either Philo Platonizeth, or Plato Philonizeth;" Apion the Grammarian, whom Tiberius Caesar called "the cymbal of the world ;" and Pliny, " the trumpet of public fame ;" Didymus the Grammarian; Claudius Ptolemeus, though some say that Pelusium was his country; Appian the Historian, therefore called the Alexandrian ; Clemens the Presbyter, surnamed Alex- andrinus ; Origen^ of whom it is said, " Where well none better, where ill none worse;" Athanasius, Cyril, DidymUs, surnamed the Blind; and others whose names I do not now remember. Alexandria is now by the Turks, under whose yoke it groans, called El Iskanderieh, by corrupting the name of Alexander, whose corpse, Quintus Curtius' saith, was transported thither from Memphis. Ptolemy's famous library, as Ammianus Marcellinus * saith, was burnt when the city was destroyed under Julius Caesar. The Jews had equal privileges in Alexandria with the Macedonians. See Grotius upon 3 Maccabees. And of them of Cilicia. Cillcia, now Carmania, was one In Constantine's time; then It was divided into two parts, the first > Mem. 201. » Antiq. xvj. 10. ' Lib. *. cap. 10. * Lib. xxii. cap. 41.^ 136 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VI. of which was called " Cilicia the first, a champaign (or level) ground, and consular," saith Spanheim, Introd. ad Geog.^ Sac. " It had upon the west Isauria, upon the east the second Cilicia, upon the south the sea of Cyprus; the- metropolis of it is Tarsus, the head of the nation, a colony of the Romans, a free city, having the privilege of a Eoman city ; whence that of Paul of Tarsus below, ch. xxii. 28."" The second Cilicia, called also Trachea, having upon the north Mount Taurus, upon the east Comagene, upon the south the Issick Gulf, which had its name from the town Issus between Syria and Cilicia, famous for the victory obtained there by Alexander against Darius ; where also Cicerq, as he reports of himself,^ was called emperor, and boasteth that he had the same tents which of old Alexander had. This was a province ruled by the emperor's lieutenant sent thither with a garrison ; but its metropolis was Anazarba or Anazarbus, otherwise called Diocaesarea. There is mention made of this second Cilicia in the acts of the council of Chalcedon. And Asia. See what we have said above, ch. ii. 9. 10. And they were not able to resist the wisdom and the Spirit. That is, the wisdom suggested to him by the Holy Ghost. The particle and is put in the beginning of the verse instead of " but," which is frequently done in other places of scripture. By which he spake. As much as to say, by which Stephen's tongue and iiis mind while he was speaking were directed, according to Christ's promise. Matt. x. 20; Luke xxi. Ii5. Beza witnesseth, that in a most ancient Greek copy of his is added here. Because they were reproved by him with all boldness, that is, with all freedom. 11. Then. To wit, when they could not resist the truth. They suborned. The old Latin interpreter expresseth it by the word submiserunt, in which sense the best Latin authors use the verb immittere. See Gellius 4 Noct. Attic 18, Sallust. Catil. Plin. lib. vi., epist. 13. 12. 7%e elders. That is, the senators of the Sanhedrim. To the council. The Greek hath it Sanhedrim. 13. And set up false loitnesses. They are also said to be false witnesses who give a false construction to what hath been truly spoken, and turn it to a crime ; as they here turn that to wicked- » We contradict this, moved ty the reasons of Grotius upon that place. » 2 Ep. X. 5. Attic. 20. VJER. II.J LITERALLY EXPLAIKED. 137 ness and blasphemy, which according to truth was foretold of the destruction of the temple, and the ceasing for the most part of the rites depending thereon. See Luke xix. 43, 44. David inveighs against such witnesses in the person of Doeg, Ps. liL 2 — 5, compared with 1 Sam. xxii. 9 — 13. Blasphemous words. That is. Base and reproachful. Against this holy place. That is. Against the temple of God. Acts XXV. 8; Matt. xxvi. 61. 14. A nd shall change the customs. That is, The legal ceremonies, which typified Christ to come, and the gospel law. 15. Saw his face as it had been the face of an angel. That is, they beheld his face full of reverent and serene gravity. CHAPTEE VII. 1. The high priest. That is, the chief of the Sanhedrim. Are these things so ? As if he had said. Are these things true which they say and witness against thee ? 2. And he said. Seeing Stephen was accused, because that he, moved by divine instinct and inspiration, had foretold the destruc- tion of the temple, and the abolishing of the legal ceremonies, that he might demonstrate and evince that there was no evil in that, he, briefly running over all ancient history even to their times, covertly intimateth, that the favour of God was restricted to no place, not even to the temple or tabernacle ; and also that the Jews, if they did sufficiently lay to heart their own doings, and those of their nation, had no reason to be offended at this prediction. Men, brethren, and fathers. If we may give credit to the famous Salmasius, " Stephen, who was a-proselyte, calls the Jews brethren, as being partaker of the same promises with them, an observer of the same law, a worshipper of the same God. He -calls them also fathers, because proselytes, being their disciples from Avhom they had the law, were accounted, as it were, their children, and they as their fathers." But the apostle Paul, who was not a proselyte, but a Jew by nation, useth the same compellation to the Jews below, ch. xxii. 1. It is more reasonable therefore to say, that 138 THE ACTS OF THE HOLT APOSTLES [CHAf. Til. both Stephen a proselyte, and Paul a Jew by birth, call the younger among them brethren, and the older fathers. The God of glory. Hebrew, « The King of glory." Ps. xxlv. 7. That is, the omnipotent and glorious God, King of kings. Appeared unto our father Ahraham. Stephen might use this expression, not only as a Christian, but also as a Jew, or a prose- lyte of the Jewish religion. " The God of the Jews, who calls himself the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and of Jacob, is also the God of Jhe proselytes ; for the proselytes worshipped one and the same God, and bound themselves to observe the same law -with that which he gave to the Jews. If they could call the God of the Jews their God, as well as the Jews, who can deny that they could call Abraham their father ? But seeing Abraham, by the promise made by God to him, was called the father of nations ; those nations, whose father he was called by God, could be no other than those which the Messiah purchased to God the Father by his own blood. And there is no doubt but the Christians at this day may call Abraham their father." Thus far the renowned Salmasius. When he was in Mesopotamia, That is, while he yet abode at Ur of the Chaldees. " Not to mention the fables of the Hebrews, who change Ur into an appellative name, I do not approve of their opinion, though it seem more probable to Bocha?t,* who places Ur towards the mountainous parts of Armenia, in the confines of Syria, and more northern Mesopotamia, where by the name Ur, they de^ note a Persian castle.^ For neither does the name of Chaldsea seem to be extended so far ; nor had Abraham then coms from the east, but rather from the north. Neither can a demonstrative argument be drawn from the similitude of names (such as is that of the Persian castle in Marcellinus, whither he reporteth that Cassianus and Mauritius came), as Bochart himself elsewhere observes. Isaac Vossius, a very learned man, will have Ur to be the same with Chebar or Chobar, at the confluence of the Chabor and Euphrates; but the way is nearer from that place into Syria ; nor was it need- ful for those that were journeying to Canaan to go up into Charran, nor was that a city of Chaldsea. Therefore it is uncertain whether it be Ura, mentioned by Pliny,' in the turning of Euphrates to- ward the east, and Babylonia ; or Ouria, spoken of by Eupolemus, • Phaleg. lib. ii. cap. 6. = Amm. lib. xxv cap. 26. ' Lib. «. cap. 24, VEE. II. j LITBRALLY EXPLAINED. 139 a city of Babylonia, according to Eusebius;' but according to Ptolemy, situate near Euphrates, in Babylonia; or the city Orchoa, or any other city of Chaldsea, whose name was changed. But the Chasedim, Chaldaeans, who were the issue of Chesed the son of Nahor, Gen. xxii. 22, seem to be mentioned by a prolepsis, Gen. xi. 31, as are the names of Bethel, Dan, &c." Thus far the most renowned Frederick Spanheim, the son, in his introduction to Sacred Geography. The most learned Usher, bishop of Armagh, is of opinion that the word Chasedim is rather an appellative of a sect, denoting diviners and magicians, than the proper name of a nation. The fortune-tellers in Chaldsea itself, are also found dis- tinguished by that name, Dan. ii. 2, 10 ; iv. 7 ; v. 11. " Stephen," saith Heidegger, "reckons Mesopotamia the same with Chaldsea. For this reason certainly, that that part of Mesopotamia which lies next to Syria, is in the scriptures also mentioned under the name of Chaldaea. And Pliny, lib. vi. 26, declareth that some part of Babylonia, yea, Babylon itself, was comprehended within the bounds of Mesopotamia." Babylon, the head of the Chaldaic nations, for a long time enjoyed the greatest renown in the whole world ; on which account the rest of Mesopotamia and Assyria was called Babylonia. And the same Pliny a little after : " There are also cities in Mesopotamia, Hipparenum, and this of the Chaldees, as also Babylon near the river Narraga, which gave name to a city." The Persians demolished the walls of Hipparenum. The Orchens, also a third sect of the Chaldaeans, were placed in the same situ- ation, turned toward the south. " Moreover, Tremellius is of opinion that Orchoe is the same with XJr. The same Pliny'' also declareth, that Mesopotamia is bounded on the east with Tigris, on the west with Euphrates, on the south with the Persian Sea, and on the north with the mountains of Taurus; so that not only all encompassed by the two rivers, but also all places situate by their banks, are to be comprehended in Mesopotamia. Possibly the words of Josephus^ tend also to the same purpose, where, speaking of Abraham, he saith, 'When the Chaldaeans and the rest of the Mesopotamians rose up against him, he determined to transmigrate himself, and relying upon the good will and favour of God, he went and dwelt in the land of Canaan.' It is therefore apparent, that Abraham's native country TJr, may rightly be as- cribed both to Mesopotamia and also to Chaldsea." Thus far » Piap. lib. ix. ' Lib. vi. cap. 27. » An. i. 7- 140 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. Vll. Heidegger.' " Babylon," saith Lightfoot, " may also be said to be in Mesopotamia, partly, because it was situate betwixt the two rivers, Euphrates and Tigris, but especially, according to scripture idiom, because it was on the other side of the river. Which that it is observed by the vulgar interpreter, you may see from Josh, xxiv. 3, where for that which' is in the Hebrew, ' And I brought Abraham your father from beyond the river,' he has, ' I brought therefore your father Abraham from the borders of Mesopotamia.'" Eratosthenes, in Strabo, lib. iii. saith, " That Mesopotamia is comprehended with Babylonia in a great circle by Euphrates and Tigris." Before he dwelt in Charran. As if he had said, Abraham was indeed as yet in Mesopotamia when the Lord appeared to him, but at Ur of the Chaldees, not at Gharran. Abraham de- parting from Ur of the Chaldees with his father's house, came to Charran, "not with an intention to abide there, but to go over to the land of Canaan," as saith Torniellus, A.M. 2113, No. 3. But when he was come to Charran of Mesopotamia, an eastern city, not far from Uz, where Job afterwards inhabited, his father Terah was seized with a distemper, whereof he died ; hence his duty to his father, now a dying, who had given himself as a guide and companion of this pilgrimage on the account of religion, detained and kept back Abraham from accomplishing his begun journey, and so he dwelt in Charran till Terah accomplished the days of his pilgrimage, being now two hundred and five years of age, as it is related, Gen. xi. 31, 32, by way of anticipation. "Mesopotamia,^ where the Euphrates runneth close by it, to- wards the south and east, is adjoining to Arabia the Desert, being only parted from it by the river, so that there are indeed some cities (such as even at this day are Ana, or Anna, of the largest and most famous of that country), some whereof on this side of the river are accounted cities of Mesopotamia. Hence they have one and the same language, religion, and customs ; the nature of the ground is the same, being plain and barren, and running out into waste deserts, producing the same herbs and twigs ; the same emir also, or prince of the Arabians, extending his dominion a great way in Mesopotamia. Whence it is, that the southern part of Mesopotamia is by Xenophon, lib. i. Anabas., Pliny, Hist. ' Hiat. Sac. Patriaro. torn. i. exercit. 23, num. 45, & torn. ii. exercif. 3, num. 6. ' Frid. Spauhem. Hist. Job i. cap. 7, n. 4. VER. II.] LlTERALtY EXPLAINED. 141 lib. V. cap. 24 ; Strabo, Geogr. lib. xvi. and others, reckoned a part of Arabia. But now Charran, the place of Nahor's abode, called by Josephus Xapav, also Charrhai by Stephen, Ptolemy, and Sozo- men ; Xappav in the Acts ; by Jerome Aran, as also Carrae, if it be the same city with that of the Roman writers of the Crassian overthrow, Charan by the Geog. of Nubia, called also Nahor, from Nahor who built and inhabited it, Gen. xxiv. 10, is situate in that part of Mesopotamia, which the river Chabora water eth, between Euphrates and Ascorus ; for by holy writ we may learn that Charran lay in the way that leadeth from Chaldea into Canaan, Gen. xi. 31. So that it is altogether more southerly, towards Arabia the Desert, and Syria Palmyrena, or Aram Tsaba. For the way from Ur of the Chaldees to Palestine is from the east to the west, except where to avoid the unpassable places of Arabia travellers turn toward the north, through that part of Mesopotamia that is more southerly, which is to the northward of Chaldffia. Again, the country of Charran was said to be east- erly in respect of Palestine, Gen. xxix. 1. Hence it is certainly in the southerly part of Mesopotamia, which borders with that part of Arabia where the inhabitants dwell in tents, according toihe style of the scripture and the insight of maps. For the northern parts of both the Syrias and the country of Assyria are not said to be eastward but northward. Hence we may discern their mistake, who will have Charran to be situate a great way towards the north and the mountains of Armenia, about the 36th or 37th degrees of latitude, and who confound it with Edessa, or Orfa, as E. Benjamin, Peter Appian, Jacob Ziglerus, Joseph Moletius, and others. And the Carrae that are there marked toward the Assyrians, whence Lucan called them the Assyrian Carr^, as in the book of Tobit they are placed between Nineveh and Eaghes, are of neces- sity altogether different from the Charran of Nahor, and Abra- ham. Charran, therefore, in Mesopotamia was situated betwixt Babylonia and that part of Syria which led into Palestine ; hence it lies more towards the south, not far from the river Euphrates, as the Chaldean paraphrase hath it. The Nubian geographer confirms this, who will have Harran to be more southerly than the city of Aleppo, about 31 degrees north latitude. Hence Arias Montanus, on Gen. xxiv. 10, declareth the city Padan to be in that tract nearer to Babylonia, which more truly was the country in which Charran the city of Nahor was situate; nor 142 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VII. was it contiguous to Palestine, ■ as Adrichomius will have it In the theatre of the H0I7 Land, which, as being in Mesopotamia, is rather contiguous to Arabia the Desert, as this is extended north- ward to Euphrates, wherein we have placed Job's habitation ; yea, those of the east do declare that Charran in Abraham's days was inhabited by the Sabsean Arabians, as also the famous Hottinger in his Oriental History, chap, viii., out of Kesseus the Muham- medan." And he said unto him. To wit, when he was addicted to the superstition and idol-worship of the Chaldaeans, or as those of the east say, of the Zabians, Jos. xxiv. 2. 3. Get thee out of thy country. The uninterrupted tenor of the words sufficiently importeth, that he speaketh' of one call, when Abraham dwelt at Ur of the Chaldees, where he was born and brought up. The call itself, together with the promise, is extant; Gen. xii. 1, 2, 3. Stephen, indeed, left out the promise, because it was not needful to touch upon every particular. Come into the land which I shall show thee. He promiseth that he will at length show him the land, which he did not express in the call itself. Hence also, Heb. xi. 8, Abraham is said to have gone out, not knowing whither he went. If Abraham knew not whither he went, the land towards which he must go could not be shown him till after his setting out ; whence is it that, by a prolepsis, Abraham is said to have set out from Ur of the Chaldees, to- gether with Terah his guide in his pilgrimage, and Sarai and Lot his companions therein, that he might go into the land of Canaan? Torniellus answers, in the year of the world 2113, No. 3 : " That it might very well be, that Abraham when he set out, knew that God would have him go to the land of Ca- naan ; but that he did not know whether God would have him to •settle there, or go further to some more remote country, and there- fore he came into Charran, not with a design to settle there, but to pass over towards the land of Canaan, firmly believing that there the Lord would show him the land whereto he must go, and in which he must abide ; even as a little after it truly came to pass. For when he came to Sichem in the land of Canaan, he heard from God, Gen. xii. 7 : To thy seed will I give the land. 4. Then. To wit, after Abraham understood both God's com- mands and promises. TER. IV.J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 143 He came out of the land of the Chaldeans. As if he had said, he utterly forsook his father's house, and together with his father, Sarai and Lot, departed from Ur of the Chaldeans. Stephen will have Mesopotamia the same with Chaldea. "The Arabians," saith Ludovicus de Dieu, " are still of opinion that Chaldeu- be- longs to Mesopotamia." For the geographer of Nubia, in the sixth part of the fourth climate, where he describeth Mesopotamia, saith, " that Bagdad extendeth thither, which is that we now call Babylon the metropolis of Chaldea ; whose province Benjamin of Tudela in his Itinerary, concludeth to be Beretz Sinear, in the land of Shinar, which is, Chaldea." But although God's call commanding Terah, together with Abraham, Sarai, and Lot to depart from Ur of the Chaldeans, was directed to Abraham, yet because Terah was father of the family, therefore. Gen. xi. 31, the business of migration is ascribed to him, not to a son of his family, as Scaliger' hath rightly observed. And dwelt in Charran. "For no long time," saith the most eloquent of the Jews, Philo, in his Book of Dreams. Augustine, de Civ. Dei, xvi. says, that Abraham's departure from Ur of the Chaldeans, and from Charran, fell out in one and the same year ; which Josephus confirms,, while he writeth, Ant. i. 8 : That Abraham left Chaldea when he was seventy-five years of age. " Moses, speaking," saith Heidegger, " of Terah, Abraham, and the rest that went with them to Charran," saith. Gen. xi. 31, Dtb' t3i»';5 and they dwelt there. And of Terah, indeed, that when he was aged two hundred and five years, he there put a period to his last day. But Moses hath not expressed how long Abraham and the rest of his companions dwelt there : yet it is probable, that he did not stay long there, yea, not a whole year, that he might not seem refractory to the divine call. For what else but sickness and infirmity of body could deter Terah from accomplishing the journey he had undertaken, whom piety towards God caused to forsake his native country, and his own house ? What also but dutifulness toward his dying father, who on the account of re- ligion had given himself for a guide and a companion in this pilgrimage could hinder Abraham, whose ready obedience in obey- ing the divine call is so much spoken of in the scripture, from going straight into the land of Canaan ? For that Terah, either taken with the pleasantness of the place, as Aben Ezra fondly ' In Elencho. Pareano. 144 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VII. imagines, or making a relapse unto his old idolatry, as others allege, tarried at Charran, and would not accompany his son, is as like a fiction as may be. Nor are we much moved with Petavius's, Bonfrerius's, and Harvilleus's arguments, by which they would evince that Abraham dwelt at Charran several years. First, say they, Stephen saith Abraham dwelt in Charran, KarotKija-at Iv Xappav. But it is probable, that by the word dwelt, some years are denoted. Secondly, Abraham is said. Gen. xii. 5, to have gotten souls, that is, to have purchased slaves, beasts, and cattle, whereby his goods were increased. Now in purchasing these, and gathering them together, there must of necessity several years be spent. Thirdly, Abraham called Charran his own land. Gen. xxiv. 4. But he would not have called it his own land, if he had not dwelt in it for some years. For who would call that his own land which he only passed over? These arguments have no solidity in them. Not the first ; for let us suppose that Terah and Abraham departed from Ur of the Chaldeans toward the latter end of the spring, and that Terah's sickness interrupting them, they continued there all the summer and winter following, and then that Abraham again parted from Charran in the beginning of the next spring ; was not the interval of time long enough, that he might be said to have dwelt there ? So he who hires a house for six months, although a lesser time, is yet no less said to have dwelt there, than he who has continued his habitation in it for six years. And the Hebrew word 3ffi, as also the Chaldaic a^ln;, sig- nifies not only " to dwell," but also " to sit ;" so that the shortest _ stay in a place is enough to say these words of an inhabitant. Not the second, for there is no necessity why we should rather understand Moses of gathering together riches, slaves, and cattle brought forth in his house, than of procuring by emption slaves, cattle, and other things, whereby his patrimony left by his father might be increased. And this acquisition, in how small a time might it be performed ? Not the third, for neither does Abraham call Charran his own -land, but Aram Naharaim, or Mesopotamia, as appears. Gen. xxiv. 4, compared with ver. 10. But not Charran only was in Mesopotamia, but also Ur of the Chaldeans, as we have shown above. And from thence, &c. Terah, Abraham's father is said to have lived two hundred and five years, when he died at Charran, Gen. xi. 32. But Abraham, whom Stephen here saith plainly not to VER. IV.J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 145 have gone from Charran till after Terah'a decease, Gen. xii. 4, is said expressly to have been seventy-five years of age when he departed from Charran. If we subtract these seventy-five years from the two hundred and five of ferah's age, the remainder will be a hundred and thirty years. Abraham was therefore born in the hundred and thirtieth year of Terah. And therefore when in Gen. xi. 26, Terah is said at the seventieth year of his age to have begotten Abram, Nahor, and Haran, the meaning is, Terah began to beget three sons, Abraham, the first in merits and dignity, but the youngest by birth ; the second, Nahor ; Haran, the third, whom many will have to have been the eldest of all, seeing he was father to Melcha the wife of Nahor, and Jescha, whom the He- brews think to be Sarah, Abraham's wife. Abraham, therefore, after the death of his father went forward to the land of Canaan, according as the Lord had commanded him when he was yet in Ur of the Chaldeans, taking with him Sarai and Lot, who came with him from Ur of the Chaldeans, and all the substance that he had purchased at Charran. Josephus, Ant. i. 8, reports, that Abraham, in his journey from Charran to Canaan, made a stop at Damascus, and reigned there ; his words are these : " Nicolaus the Damascene, in the fourth book of his history writeth thus : ' Abraham reigned in Damascus when he was a stranger, as one who had come with an army from the country situate above Babylon, which is called Chaldea.' " Nor much different is that of Justin,^ Trogus Pom- peius's Epitomist. " The city had its name from Damascus, king thereof. After Damascus, Azelus, then Adores, and Abraham and Israel, were kings thereof." "But," as Pererius excellently reasoneth,^ " Abraham had sinned grievously, nor had he fulfilled the command of God, whereby he was enjoined to depart from Mesopotamia into Canaan, as was fitting, if he had attempted not only to stay at Damascus, but also making light account of God's promises, to purchase himself a kingdom. Add that Abraham every where professed himself a pilgrim and stranger ; and Jacob acknowledged the same of himself and his forefathers. He there- fore had nowhere a proper seat and habitation, much less a kingdom." Nor does the account of time permit that Abraham should be said to have made any long stay at Damascus, that he might reign there. For, seeing the year in the which he departed from Charran was the seventy-sixth year of his age, and the same ■' Hist. Philip, lib. xxxvi. " On Gen. xii. 11. L 146 THE ACTS OP THK HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VII. Abraham, after he had dweilt ten years in Canaan, took Hagar to wife, of whom in the eighty-sixth year of his age he begot his son Ishmael, Gen. xvi. 15, 16, it appears that he went direfctly frora Mesopotamia to Canaan, and that he nowhere fixfed any settled ■habitation till he came to Canaan. Moreover, whether he had obtained that kingdom by force or entreaty, he wo'uld not so soon have deserted it, especially when he was- constrained by famine to tmdertake a journey to Egypt ; nor would the sacred writers have neglected to give some hints of a passage so considerable^ and which ^tould have tended so much to the glory of the Jews. 5. And he gave him not, &c. Stephen proposes two things here to be considered in Abraham, whereby God did mightily exercise his faith. First, That he transported him into Canaan, ■vfrhich the Jews now iiihabit, and yet gave him no possessionj not so much as a 'foot-breadth. Secondly, That he promised to give this land to him and his seed, when as yet he had ho seed. 6. And God spake, &c. As if he had said. But God foretold to Abraham, seized with a deep sleep and fearj.:Gen. xv., that his seed should be a stranger in a land that is not theirs ; that is, in a strange land, and should be in bondage and afflictiofl there four hundred years. That these four hundreds years are to be com- puted from the hundredth ■ year of Abraham in the which he begat Isaac, or the hundred and fifth year in which a separation was made of Abraham's seed,- and an appointing of Isaac heir, Ishmael being banished, Geh. xxi., is beyond all question; for in this prophecy (in which he appointeth four hundred , years for the wandering, affliction, and bondage of his posterity) God maketh express mention of the seed that should wander, be afflicted, and in bondage; and therefore these four hundred years cannot be thought to have had a being, before that seed was appointed or actually differenced and determined. But the time from Abra- ham's removing into Canaan to the year of the Israelites' departure from Egypt is computed to be four hundred and thirty years. Hence Paul, Gal. iii. 17, plainly reckoneth four hundred and thirty years from the promise made to Abraham, Gen. xii., when he was about to depart from his native country, to the publishing of the law which was On the third month after the children of Israel's departure out of Egypt.' "The years of 'the pilgrimage of the children of Israel," saith Heidegger, " are described by Moses, Exod. xii. 40, aiB'iai, And the sojourning of the children of Israel, - VilE. Vll] LrtEllALLY EXPLAINED. 147 *^i^, thai gejbuHttd in Epypt, dmttmed four hmdted and tMfty yaurs. Oil iVldch place Dr. Usher,' Bishop of Atmagh,' leai'nedly dbsdtves three "thiilgs especlSilly. First, " Thstt the word aiSi?3, ks genfcTally it dehdtes atly hstbitation, so When it is referred to foreigilers ittid strangers it signifies a pilgrimage. ' Heiiee With the Hebrews Si^ifn denoteth a ebjourner and pilgriitii and Abraham himself, Gen. xsiiii. 4, saith that he was Siis'irria a strtinget and pilyrim. And Gen. ixi. 34, instead of ijn ^^^ CJh&ldee has nrtihi. And ch. "ixviii. 4, ihs'tead of T'^ja VTIi^^fii? the same has 'Th*ih"in NVTK >i\ Setsondly, That the land of Canaan, as it was feccounted the laid of the sojourning of Abraham, Isaacj and Jacob, so also of the Israelites that descended from them ; to Wit, by reason of that Strict tie of kin that is betwixt forefathers and their posterity. And trtlly God had promised tO -those three patriarchs, Abraham, Isaafc, and Jacob, that he Would give them this land of their pilgrifiaagfej to be by them heritably possessed, Ps. cv. 11, Which aftel'Wards was accomplished in their posterity. As there- fore the possession of the posterity is attributed to the forefathers ; so also the pilgrimage of the forefathers is attributed to this posterity. Instances of this you may, see Ps. Ixvi. 6; Hos. xii. 4; Amos v. 25; Judgi x. 11, 12; Acts vii. 42. Thirdly, That seeing the Hebrews have no cases, the pronoun "ii^!< here has an ambigtious refefeiice. Hence it is that the Vulgate Latin 'edition, the Pdlyglott BibleS, the Eoyal of Antwerp^ and the Jay an of Paris, read in this place : " But the dwelling of the children of Israel, who sojourned in EgJ^t, was for four hundred^ and thirty years." Whereas other copies of the same edition have i " The dwelling of the children of Israel, whereby they abode in Egypt." To which latter acceptation of the relative pronoun detetmifling the chronography, seeing it attributes four hundred and thirty ye^ars to the sojourning t)f the children of Israel in' Egypt, which Was a shorter time by half, the former is altft- gether to be preferred, which remotes that 'inconvenience, and gives us only a prosopogfaphy, or a description of them whose entire pilgrinflftge, bfeginning at thS seveinty-sixth year of Abra- ham's age, is cofltinued thence to the going forth out of Egypt for the space of four hundred ye^rs. But the reason why Moses takes that descriptibn of the Israelites from their sojourning in Egypt, was, because that pilgrimage of the patriarchs was both ' Chronol. Sac. lib. ii. cap. 8. L 2 148 THE ACTS OF TUB HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VIL, but of a few only, and frequently interrupted, and less obvious to men's view, to wit, when they were but small in number, yea, very few, and strangers in it, and went from one nation to another, and from one kingdom to another people, Ps. cv. 12, 13. But this sojourning of their children in Egypt comprehended a great multitude of men, was stable, and much spoken of by all. " For three things," as Pererius noteth, " made the sojourning of the children of Israel in Egypt observable and famous. First, The preferment of Joseph, during whose life the people of Israel were in very great repute. Secondly, Their notable aud admirable increase after Joseph's death, though they were afflicted with a most heavy bondage. Thirdly, Their deliverance, and going forth out of Egypt, accompanied with so many and great miracles." The Greek has thus translated that place of Exod. xii. 40, " Now the pilgrimage of the children of Israel, whereby they and their fathers wandered in the land of Canaan, and in the land of Egypt, continued four hundred and thirty years." Thus have the Alexandrine manuscript, the Complutensian, and Aldine editions. And it appears that it was read so of old by Eusebius in his Chronicon, Quintus Julius Hilarion, in his small book of the duration of the worlcl,^ Austin, q. 47, in Exodus, and Sedulius in Gal. iii. Moreover, in the very time of the apostles, Dositheus delivered this place of Exodus to his Samaritans, thus new par- geted out of the Greek translation : " Now the sojourning of the children of Israel, and of their fathers, whereby they sojourned in the land of Canaan, and in the land of Egypt, was four hundred and thirty years." George Syncellus' saith, " The computation of four hundred and thirty years of the pilgrimage of Israel in the lands of Canaan and Egypt, according to God's prediction to Abraham, takes its beginning, by the common suffrage of the interpreters and historians, from the seventy-fifth year of Abra- ham's age." Moreover, not only Eusebius, and other Christian chronographers, divide the space of four hundred and thirty years into two equal intervals, but Josephus' also, and before Christ's .days, Demetrius, not Phalereus, but the younger, fiova whom Alexander, surnamed Polyhiptor, relateth that from the time that Abraham was chosen from among the nations, and came from Charran into Canaan, unto the coming of Jacob into Egypt was ' [De Mundi Duratione in Galland's Bibliotheca Patrum, vol. viii. p. 285.] . . ' I Chron. p. II7. ' Ant. ii. 6. VER. VI.] LITERALLY SXPLAINED. 149 two hundred and fifteen years. Which sum of two hundred and fifteen years may be made up out of the scriptures without siny difficulty. For Abraham went to Canaan when he was seventy- five years old. Gen. xii. 4. From tlie time that Abraham went to Canaan to the hundredth year of his age, in the which he begat Isaac, Gen. xxi. 5, are twenty-five years. From Isaac's nativity to that of Jacob, Gen. xxv. 26, sixty years. From Jacob's nativity to his going down with his whole family into Egypt, Gen. xlvii. 9, a hundred and thirty years. All which years added together make up the sum of two hundred and fifteen years. As to the other two hundred and fifteen years past in Egypt till their going out thereof. Bishop Usher describes them thus : from Jacob's going down into Egypt until the death of Joseph are seventy-one years. Thence till the birth of Moses sixty-four. Thence to the Israelites going forth out of Egypt eighty, Exod. vii. 7. All which years joined together make up the two hundred and fifteen years of the sojourning of the Israelites in Egypt. Shall bring them into bondage, Augustine, Civ. Dei, lib. xvi. cap. 24. "As it is written of Terah, Abraham's father ; 'and his days at Charran were two hundred and five years ;' not that they were all passed there, but because they were there finished, so likewise it is therefore here added. And shall bring them into bondage, and will afflict them four hundred years, because in that same affliction the number is completed, not because it was all performed there." The same Augustine, Q. 47. on Exodus saith, " What God said to' Abraham, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and they will bring them into bondage, and oppress them four hundred years, is not to be under- stood so, as if the people of God were to continue in that most grievous bondage for the space of four hundred years ; but because it is written. In Isaac shall thy seed be called, the four hundred and five years are computed from the year of Isaac's nativity, until the year of the outgoing out of Egypt. If therefore you subtract from the four hundred and thirty years the five and twenty which intervened betwixt the promise and the birth of Isaac, it is no matter of admiration, if the scripture would express the four hundred and five years by the even sum of four hundred, seeing it uses so to denominate time, that that which a little exceeds or comes short of the sum of the more perfect number, be not computed. What therefore he says, They will bring them into 16Q THE ACXg OF THE HQ^y A?OSTLES [CHA?, VII. bomiaffej arid oppress them) is not to be riefprFgii to the four hundred years, as if tjiey should keep them in bondage so many years ; but the fpur hundred years are to be referred to this, Thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is net theirs ; for that seed; was a stranger, whether in the lapd of Canaan, or that of. Egypt, until they received for their inheritance the land, agcprding to Grpd's promise, which was accomplished after that they were delivered out of Egypt : so that a hyperbaton is here understood, and, the order, of the words should be thus: "Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs four hundred years ;" bi?t that this is supposed to be interposed, " and they ■yv^ill bring them into bondage, and oppress thenoi 5" so that this interpQsition doth not belong to the four hundred years. Fov it was in the latter part of the years of this sum, that is after the death of Joseph, that the people of Crod laboured under that grievpus bondage." 7. And the nation to fvhem tjiey shall $e in bondage will I judge. That is, I will punish. Tojvdge is frequently used for "to punish," 2 Chron. xx, 12, Our God, wilt tjiou not therefore judge tliern 9 Ps. ix. 19, Let the nations be judged in thy sight, And hence judg- ment is put for " punishnieut," Prov. xix, 29, Judgrp.ents are pre- pared for scorners, that is, punishments. So Expd. xii. 12, Against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment, that is, I ■^ill inflict punishment upon all the gods of Egypt. 8. Axtd he gave him a testament Greek, " a covenant." As if he had said, after he had made those excellent promises he commanded Abraham and his posterity to be eirctinicised ; that the same cirr: cumQJ&ion might be as it were a seal of the covenant entered intc^ with Abraham and his natural seed. "Xhis," saith Grrotius, " makes for Stephen's purpose, that the observance of circumcision might not be believed to be the cayse of the promises," And so. To wit, after he was circumcised. He begat Isfioe. Not by the power pf nature, but by virtue of God's promise jnade tO him, that Isaac, giveii on account fif the promise, might be aij eaynest and shadow pf the grace that ifyas tq be given by the gospel. The patriarchs, That iSj the fathers pf the ti^srelye tribes of Israel. See above, ch, il. 27, 9. And the patriarch? rnoved with envVi Here Stephen briefly hints at the emulation of the patriarcHg, froni whom the Jewg boast^ of their original, to vf%%, that they, out pf a detestali VEK. XI. J LITEHALLY EXPLAINED. 151 hatred and envy sold him to the Midianite merchants, Gen. xxxvii. 28, who was ordained by God a saviour for them, that they might carry him into Egypt. " This js," saith Casaubon, " that selling of slaves, which the ancients called tir l^.ajwy^, .when the slaves were sold on that condition, that they should be transported into remote countries." Moreover, Stephen covertly insinuates, that after the same manner Jesus was delivered by the envious multitude of the Jews to the Romans, that, he might be crucified. Aad God was with Mm. As if he had said, but God turned the evil, wherewith Joseph's brethren oppressed him, to his good. Gen. 1. 20. As it also fell out in your envy agaipst Jesus who was crucified, above, ch. iii. 8. 10. Gaxe him favour and wisdom. A figure of speech called hendyades, that is, he made him gracious for his wisdom. Gen. xli. 39. In the sight of Pharaoh. That is, with Pharaoh king of Egypt, whom the Egyptian priest .Manetbo called Mephramuthosis. Justin also, out of Trogus, lib. xxxvi., c. 2, declareth that Joseph was entiiely beloved by Pharaoh. " Epr," saith he, " being most quicksighted, he was the first that invented the knowledge of dreams, and nothing either of divine or bupian aiFairs escaped his knowledge, so that he foresaw the barrenness of their lands many years before it came to pass; and all Egypt had perished with the famine, if the king had not at his admonition commanded by an edict, that the corn $hpuld be laid up in store for several years ; and his proofs were suchj that they seemed not to proceed from men, but to be oracles given from God." Ife made him governor over Egypt. That is, he advanced him to the chief place of authority in the kingdom. Gen. xli. 43. And over all his house. That is, according as Grotius interprets it, " He made him also master of his court, such as the high stewards were to the French of old, and to the Greeks of Con- stantinople, the KvpoTfaXarqi, so called because the care of the palace was committed to them." So God hath set Jesus Christ over his heavenly cgurt, an^ hath given hinj supreme power next to himself. 11. Now there came a dearth, &c. That is, "When sufficient pj:/?vision was made in Egypt for a famine, a grievous scarcity of corn vjexe^ sorely ^he whple earth," as Sulpicius Severus expresseth it, ^ac. Hist, lib. i. So now a hardness of heart, blindness of 152 . THE ACTS OF THE HOLK APOSTLES [cHAP. VII. mind, and a famine of the heavenly bread, came upon those who are called Egyptians by a certain figure of speech, who profess the Christian religion externally ; aud upon the Jews, who would drive away, exterminate, and cast out Christ. 12. He sent our fathers Jirst That is, in the first year of the famine. As if he had said, Jacob pinched with famine sends his ten sons for corn into Egypt, keeping Benjamin his youngest son with him at home. " So," saith Daniel Brenius, " in the first embassage, whereby the Jews are hitherto compelled to be as it were disowned of God in Egypt, spiritually so called, Messiah the deliverer, although by them desired, yet is not acknowledged, because they were not yet aright affected for the evil of rejecting him, and the judgments they thereby brought upon themselves." 13. And in the second. To wit, year of the famine, when Joseph's brethren returned to him for corn. Known, &c. That is, he made himself known to them. Gen. xlv. 1. And so Joseph's kindred was made known unto Pharaoh or Mephramuthosis. " The manifestation of Joseph to his brethren when they returned to him the second time," saith the now cited Daniel Brenius, " doth typically represent to us, that the Jews at last brought under with calamities, at the second time, when the gQgpel of Christ shall be again preached, and his name spread throughout the whole earth, shall acknowledge him for the Messiah, and God on the other side, owning them for the Messiah's brethren, will make them partakers of his good things through him." 14. Then sent Joseph, &e. As if he had said, at the command of king Mephramuthosis, Joseph sends back his brethren furnished with chariots, provision, and presents, to bring thither his father and his whole family, with all expedition : " forewarning them that the famine would continue five years longer," as saith Sul- picius Severus, Sac. Hist., lib. i. See Gen. xlv. Threescore and ^f teen souls. That is, consisting of seventy -five persons. " Interpreters have been at very much pains," saith the famed Ludovicus de T)ieu, "to reconcile this place with that of Gen. xlvi. 26, where Moses makes mention only of seventy souls of Jacob's house, that went dowm into Egypt. But there is no great difficulty in it, if we say that the places are not parallel. For Moses makes his account, wherein, together with Jacob, only his posterity and those that proceeded out ' of his loins, are compre- hended, his sons' wives being expressly excepted, ver. 26. For VJSR. XIV.] LlTEllALLY EXPLAINED. 153 which reason, not only those who actually entered Egypt with him, but also Joseph and his two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, are comprehended in the number of seventy, although they were in Egypt long before ; because, both as proceeding out of Jacob's loins, and being as to their original of the land of Canaan, they were strangers in Egypt, and so were deservedly reckoned, as if they had gone down into Egypt with Jacob. And it is of singular moment in that catalogue, that Judah's two grand-children by Pharez, to wit, Hezron and Hamul, although they were not then born, as may be gathered from the series of time, but afterwards in Egypt, are comprehended in that number, ver. 11, that they might supply the place of the two sons of Judah, Er and Onan, then deceased. For which reason also, Numb. xxvi. 21, whereas in the rest of the tribes, not the grandchildren but only the children make up the princes of the families, in the tribe of Judah alone, not only his sons, Selah, Pharez, and Zerah, but also his grandchildren, Hezron and Hamul, are made princes of the fami- lies of Judah, as if added to his sons. But none of these things have place in Stephen's discourse ; for he does not give a genealogy of Jacob's race, but only an account who they were that Joseph sent for from the land of Canaan into Egypt. His words are. Then sent Joseph, and called Jacob his father unto him, and all his kindred, threescore and fifteen souls. He sent for more than proceeded out of Jacob's loins, but did not send for all that came out of his loins. First, therefore, Judah's two grandchildren are to be excluded there, then Joseph himself with his two sons ; for he could not send for those, as not yet born, nor himself and his sons, as already dwelling in Egypt. Therefore if we subtract these five, and then Jacob their father, who is mentioned apart by Stephen, there remain of Moses' number of seventy, but sixty- four : to wit, the eleven brethren, one sister Dinah, and fifty-two sons of the brethren, to which, if we add the eleven wives of the eleven brethren, which undoubtedly Joseph sent for together with their husbands, and which belonged to the kindred, ye have his whole kindred, seventy-five souls. The Ethiopic renders it, « And Joseph after that he knew that, he commanded that they should call his father, and all his kindred. And there came unto him seventy-five souls.' Which version excludes Joseph and his children, because they could not be said to come unto him ; but in that he errs, that he includes Jacob also in the number of the 154 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY ii-OSTLES [cHAP. VII. seventy-five souls, as coming also with the rest to Joseph. For that number agreeth only to his kindred. Nor does it militate anything against Trhat is said, that most are of opinion that the ten sons of Benjamin, who are comprehended by Moses in the number of the fifty-two grandchildren of Jacob, Gen. xlyi. 21, were at that time either none or few of them born, and therefore they could not be rightly said to have been sent for by Joseph. For it may be answered, that his sons, though born afterwards^ might be rightly added to the number, lest he only among all the brethren should be reckoned without children. But there is no necessity to recur to that, seeing he was of that age then that he might have had so many children. For Joseph was thirty years of age when he was first brought before Pharaoh, Gren. xli. 46. Betwixt which time and Jacob's entrance into Egypt intervened seven years of plenty and two of famine, Gren. xlv. 6. Now when Joseph was thirty-nine years of age, Benjamin might be of the age of thirty-seven ; at which age, especially where polygamy had obtained, why might not he be father of ten sons ? Hence it may be collected, that neither is there any error to be imputed to Mpses' text from Stephen's words, nor to Stephen's words from Moses' te?t, but that both spoke very well according to their different intent. Hence it also follows, that the text of the Seventy interpreters is corrupted, which, in Gren. xlvi. 27, instead of seventy has seventy-five. Which seems certainly to have lieen done by some Christians, who when they could not reconcile the place of Stephen with the words of Moses, and did believe that by all means Stepben was to be credited, they altered the Greek text of Moses, or rather corrupted it, that it might be at least demonstrated whence Stephen had these things. There are mfinifest signs of corruption. For, first, all the Hebrew oopiesi Jo.sephus (AnticJ. 4), and the ancient Latin interpreter, read only seventy, Secondly, The Seventy interpreters themselves, Deut. X. 32, where this story is repeated, do agree with the Hebrew, and number only seventy. Thirdly, That they might varnish the 27th verse we have mentioned, with the more likeness sf truth, they have corrupted also the 20th verse, where contrary to the faith of all the Hebrew copies, the Samaritaii, and ancient Latin, they have added five others of Joseph's posterity, to wit, Machir the son of Manasses by his concubine Syra, and Gilead, Machir'e son, Manasses' grandson ; as also' Ephraim's two sons, Shuthelah VBE. XVI.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 155 and Taam; and Edem, one son of Shuthelah, Ephraim's grandson. But instead of Taatn, Augustine, Civ. Dei, lib. xvi,, cap. 40, has Bareth, from 1 Chron. vii,, in which chapter it is also to be observed, that there is neither mention made of Taam nor Edem, and that the sons of Manasses, Machir, and Ephraim, -vyere reckoned more than five. Wherefore did they theq pitch upon only five of them to put into Moses' catalogue ? Because they who would supply Stephen's number in Moses did not stand in need of more. But the same persons, not very consistent with themselves, ver. 27, added to Manasses and Ephraim, with their five sons and grandsons, two others, although without their names. For instead of that which is in Moses, • And the sons of Joseph who were born in Egypt were two souls,' the Seventy have ' nine souls ;' whence at last was the number of the fiftyrseven souls to be collected ; so that all things in that verse are most corrupt, and worthy of no credit. Nor can any greater absurdity be imputed to Stephjen, than that Joseph sent for not only himself, and hist two sons present with him, but also his three grandsons, and two of their sons, who were born long after." 15. So Jacob went down into Egypt. Jacob, being strengthened , after his sacrifices offered to God, went down into Egypt with his whole family, in the beginning of the third year of the famine, being now aged one hundred and thirty years. Gen. xly,, xlyi., xlvii. ; and Deut. xxvi. 5. 16. And were carried aver into Sychem, &c. As if he had said, the bones of the patriarchs, who went down with Jacob into Egypt, were first indeed transported to Sychem, but thence to Hebron, and interred in the sepulchre which Abrahana, Gei}. xxiii. 16, bought from the sons of Epbron- And thus at Sychem indeed were the empty monuments, as Hieronymus an eye-^witness testi- fies in the epitaph of Paula, but in Hebron were the true sepul- clires of the patriarchs, of which Jpsephus saith, Antiq-j lib- ii., cap. 4, "But his brethren died after they had livpd happily in Egypt, whose bodies, after some time, their posterity tind children buried at Hebron. But they transported the boijes of Joseph afterwards, when the Hebrftws departed ouit of Egypt into Canaan." Whence it may be concluded that the bodies pf th^ eleven patriarchs were buried at Hebron, ^pd that bpfore their departure out of Egypt : but that Joseph's bones were transported into Canaan long after, at their departure.. For although he does 156 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. VII. not say that the bodies of the eleven patriarchs are buried in Hebron immediately after their death, but fisTo. xpovov, " a time intervening;" yet he says, that Joseph's bones Only were trans- ported iiarspov, "afterwards," when they were departed out of Egypt. The interring of the former, therefore, was performed before the departure. " Which," saith the famous Lud. de Dieu, "the very series of Stephen's discourse seems to evince. For when he had first spoken of the death of Jacob, then of the death, transportation, and burial of the patriarchs, he subjoins, that then the time of accomplishing the promise made to Abraham drew near, and that the people, increased to a great number, incurred the king's hatred, and were by Moses, after they had suffered most heavy afflictions, brought out of Egypt, which truly are so recited, that they seem to have happened after the interment of the patriarchs." In Sychem. Sicemus, or Sicima, sometime the metropolitan city of Samaria, was situated on mount Gerizim, according to Josephus.' " And seeing," saith he, " he was kindly entreated by all he came near, the Samaritans who then held the metropolis Sicima, situate on Mount Gerizim, and inhabited by the apostates of the Jewish nation, seeing that Alexander did entreat the Jews so magnificently, they resolved also to profess themselves Jews." Benjamin of Tudela gave them the same situation in his Itinerary, by whom it is called Nebelas, that is, Neapolis, for so they called it in his days. Pliny also, lib. v. cap. 13, makes mention of Neapolis among the towns of Samaria, which formerly was called Mamortha, saith he. Its name was altered from the Hebrew into a Greek form ; for it is in the Hebrew Shechem, whereof mention is made. Gen. xxxiii., xxxiv., where it is declared that Simeon and Levi the sons of Jacob, for the rape committed on their sister Dinah by the king of Shechem's Son, took it, and destroyed all the males together with the king and his son. Afterward Abimelech, Judg. ix. 45, rased it to the ground and sowed it with salt. But Jero- boam king of Israel rebuilt it, and dwelt in it, as it is declared in the History of the Kings, 1 Kings xii. We read, Gen. xxxiii. 19, that Jacob purchased a parcel of Kind from the sons of Hamor the father of Shechem for a hundred kesithis, that is, sheep or lambs. Here Joseph, whose issue obtained the propriety thereof, is said to have been buried. Josh. xxiv. 32. In the same place * In Calce lib. xi. Antiq. VER. XVI.] , LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 157 God renewed his covenant with the Israelites a little before the death of Joshua ; the Israelites gathered together, besought Eeho- boam that he would remit the rigour of their yoke ; and Christ had a conference with the woman of Samaria at Jacob's well. It was of old a city of refuge, and the metropolis of the Levites. And laid in the sepulchre. As if he had said, They were carried from the land of Sychem to Hebron, and laid in the burying-place purchased by Abraham of old for four hundred shekels. Of the sons of Hamor. These words are not construed with the verb bought, but with the more remote were laid, and so the pre- position of, does not denote the sellers of the burying-place, but the place itself, from whence the patriarchs were carried forth to their burial to be laid in the sepulchre which Abraham bought. The famed De Dieu expounds of the sons of Hamor, " by the help and assistance of the sons of Hamor, the father of Sychem." " For," saith he, " seeing that interment happened when strange people had all the power in the land of Canaan in their hands, and so the Hebrews might incur danger, when they were interring the bodies of their fathers, they very wisely first made their application to Sychem, and they not only demanded the assistance of the sons of Hamor, but also, that they might the more safely accomplish it, they committed the whole business to them, to do in it as they thought fit." So of the sons of Hamor, &c., is not to be construed with hought, but with are laid, which opinion I confess is prevalent with me, for Josephus's authority, Antiq. ii. 4." Hamor the son of Sychem. A Hebraism, that is, Hamor of Sychem, or the Sychemite. In the Greek it is an elliptic speech, Emmor of Sychem, which may be variously supplied according to the various acceptations of the word Sychem, by which sometimes a person, sometimes a place, is designed in the scriptures. If it be taken for a place, it is plain that inhabitant is understood ; if it be referred to Emmor alone, or if it be referred to the sons of Emmor, which I rather think, inhabitants is to be supplied. So that the meaning is, from the sons of Emmor the Sychemites, that is, from the Emmorrean inhabitants of Sychem. But if Sychem here be taken for a person, thei word father is to be supplied, and it must be rendered with the learned Beza, "from the sons of Hamor, the father of Sychem." For Emmor or Hamor was Sychem's father, not his son, as appears from Gen. xxxiii. 19 ; Josh. xxiv. 32. Nor is there any reason why the Greek words cannot bear that. 158 THE ACTS OF THE H0L1 APOSTLES [cHAP. VIl. «eeing the like oeciirs in approted Greek writers. Herodotiia iri Clio, "ASparog 6 FopSUu) rov MiSitiJi " Adrastus the Nephew of Gordius, who was father to Midas." Thalia, Kupcie 6 KafifUdiw, " Cyrus, Cambyses's father." iEIianus, xiii. var. 30, '0Xi//i7ridc fi AXegavSjoovj " Olynipias, Alexander's Mother." Steiph. de Urbi on the word AaiSaXa. 'H Se TroXig aird Aaid&Xov rov ^iKclpoi) -fi iv AvKiq, "Daedala, a dty of Lycia biiilt," or as the learned Tho. de Pinedo has rendered it, "was so ca,lled by DBedailus, Icarus's father/ Also Luke xxiv. 10^ Mapla 'IdK(u6ov, Mart/ the mother ofJarhei, is rightly rendered by the Syrian and both the Arabics, out of Mark XV. 40, where it is expressed. 17. The time of the promise. That was to be perfbfnied. Which God had sworn to Abraham. The famous manuscript of Englatidj and the Vulgate Latin tead, " had eonfessed." That is. Which God had made to Abrahain, dnd confirmed by an oath, Maimonides saith, that every earnest affirmation of God is balled an oath. Such is knowing know, Gen. xv. 13, that is, ktibw assuredly. The people grew and tnultiplied in Egypt. As if he had said. There was an incredible multiplication of the Israelites from the time that Jacob went down to Egypt, so that in the space of about 216 years, of seventy men 603,550 males were deSceflded, and those above the age of twenty years, besides 22,000 Levites, and the infants that were drowned alid destroyed by Pharaoh, Exod. xxxviii. 26 ; Numb. i. 46, 47, iii. 39, the devices of the Egyptians being set at nought by God. There are not wanting other instances of a speedy increase. Mankind did so increase in 250 , years after the flood, that in the army of Ninus against the Bactrians there was 700,000 foot, and 200,000 horse, according to the relation of Diodorus'Siculus out of Ctesias. 18. Till another king arose, &c. Bishop Usher, in his Afinals on the year of the world 2,427, saith : " Eataesses Miamun is that new king who knew not Jostiph ; born after his deiath, willingly casting off the remembrance of his benefits. And by his advice the Egyptians, who were affaid of mischief from the Israelites, kept them under with hard boiidage; besides their domestic and rural service they had ' also the building of the king's store-houses im- posed upon them, to wit, the cities Pithom and Eaatnsis, or Eamessis, Exod. i. 8, 14; Acts vii. 18, 19y one of which Mercator visa. XX.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 159 thinks was eo named from the king and builder thereof, the other possibly from the queen. 19. The same dealt subtilly with our kindred. That is, craftily, of free men making them vile slaves. And evil entreated our fathers. Tp wit, very severely. 80 that they cast out their young childrent As if he had said. So that they were forced to expose their young children that were males to the raging waters. " The wicked king," saith Usher, " after he had in vain commanded Shiphrah aad Puah, the Hebrew midwiveS) to make away the male infatnts privately, published an inhuman decree to drown them in the river, Exod. i. 15 — 22, in the time that intervened betwixt the birth of Aaron and Moses." To the end that they might not be quickened. That is. That they might not be preserved alive. Zwoyoi/Eiv, " to bring to life," as with the Hebrews, trnrr, the Syrians, •'HN, and the Arabics, H*n», signifies not so much " to give life anew, as to preserve that is already in being." See Exod. i. 17, 18, 22. Ezekielj a most ancient Jewish poet, whom Clemens Alexandrinus, Strom, i., and Eusebius, lib. ix. Prepar. Evang. have made mention of, in his tragedy of Moses, published in Greek and Latin by Frid. MOrellus at Paris, 1609, hath excellently expressed the import of this verse in these words : — ' " But cruel Phar&oh, 'gainst us wholly bent, Did many cunning stiatagetas invent Ub to enthral ; our lives a burden were ; In making bricks, our bodies daily wear. While he did many fenced cities rear. Next must the tender parent, his dear son In seven-stream 'd Nilus' rapid waters drown." 20. In which time. To wit, when the Israelites by the king's command were compelled to drown their children immediately when born. Moses was born. Usher, on the year of ihe world 2433, saith, " Jochebed, forty years after the death of her father Levi, brought forth Moses to Amram his nephew, her husband. For Moses was eicfhty years of age when he spoke to Pharaoh to let the Israelites go out of Egypt, Exod. vii. 7, and forty years after their outgoing, when he died in the 12th month, he was a hundred and twenty years of age, Deut. xxxi. 2 ; xxxiv. 7." • [Ezekiel appears to have been a Jew, and to have lived at the court of the PtoleUiies of Alexandria about the second century before Christ.] 160 THE ACT8 OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. VII. And he was exceeding fair. This Terence would have expressed, " And he was of so beautiful a countenance that none exceeded him," The Latin word, grains, aariioQ, saith Grotius, is from the Greek in Exod. ii. 2, where it is in the Hebrew, sia, " beautiful." " To God," which is added here in the original, is a Hebraism, Crt^^xl^, "to God," that is, very beautiful.' See our annotations on Jonah i. 2, on these words. The great city. Justin, out of Trogus, lib. xxxvi. cap. 2, makes mention of the comeliness and beauty of Moses. Of which Josephus thus. Ant. lib. ii. cap. 4, 5,\ " None was so indiiferent a spectator of beauty, who would not admire the beauty of Moses, and many that met him when he was carried in the streets were so taken with his -beauty, that they not only looked on the countenance of the child, but also forgetting other business m&,de it their work to satiate themselves with beholding him. For such was the child's beauty, that it as it were captivated and detained the beholders." And nourished up. As if he had said, the great affection of Moses' parents overcame all their fears, and so, contrary to the wicked edict of the king, they hid him three months at home, Exod. ii. 2 ; Heb. xi. 23. 21. Jnd when he was cast out, &c. As if he had said. When by reason of the diligent inquisition made by the king and their Egyptian neighbours, the child could not longer be hid, his mother put him in a basket of bulrushes daubed with slime and pitch, and laid it in the flags by the river side ; Miriam, or Mary, Moses' sister standing afar off, and expecting the event of it. Being so laid out he was found by Pharoah's daughter, who, as Josephus, Ant. ii. 5 ; Epiphanius, in Panarium, and others say, was called Thermutis. She delivered him to be nursed by Jochebed his mother, who was brought to her for that purpose by the child's sister that stood by the river side, and adopted him for her son, Exod. ii. 8. "And thus the hands of Pharoah's daughter preserve a revenger of her father's cruelty," saith Augustine. Philo addeth, "that Thermutis was Pharaoh's only heiress, and that she had been long married, and because she had no children, she gave out that she was with child, that it might be believed that she brought forth Moses, and not that she adopted him." This possibly is hinted at Heb. ii. 24, where it is said, that Moses when he was ' [Kai riv aariloQ rif Qt<} : and was a proper child in the sight of God. — Tjndale'3 version. And was acceptable unto God. — Geneva version.] VBR. XXII.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 161 grown, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter. Yet in Josephus, Ant. lib. ii. c. 5, Thermutis acknowledgeth before the king her father, that Moses was not born her son, but taken up : "Whom I have resolved to adopt for my son, and to make him thy successor in the empire and government." The same Josephus addeth, "that Moses in his infancy cast upon the ground, and trampled upon with his feet, the crown when it was put upon his head by the king of Egypt in jest. Hence he was in great danger of his life by the instigation of the Egyptian priestsj but was preserved by Thermutis. 22. Was learned, &c. In Ezekiel, the tragic poet, Moses is introduced speaking thus of himself: — " Us while a child most carefully she bred, And royally in disciplines instructed. And as she had been my mother nourished." Moses. That he was named Joachim at his circumcision, and when he was received into heaven Melchi, Clemens Alexandrinus Strom, i. reporteth, but whence he had it is uncertain. In Philo's Antiquities, he is said to have been called Melchil by his mother. Thermutis called him Moses, that is, " drawn out," or taken out, to wit,of the waters of the Nile, from Tip'a, "he drew out," "he brought out," Exod. ii. 10. Josephus believes that Moses was so called from the Egyptian word Mw, "water," and varig, "preserved," which comes from yiBin. From Maj also is Monius, as Abenezra affirms he was called by the Egyptians. " Yea," saith the most learned Hoffman in his Universal Lexicon, " in some verses of Orpheus he is called vSpoyEvrjCt that is, vSaTojevfjc, as much as to say, 'born in the water.'" But Salmasius, Ep. Ix., thinketh that the etymology of Moses is plainly Egyptian, and verbally it importeth, saith he, "taken out of the water,'' as an old poet in Eusebius affirmeth, that is MiDvcn; for Mwov in that language signifieth water, m, to take. In all the wisdom of the Egyptians. The wisdom of the ancient Egyptians chiefly consisted in hieroglyphics and mathematics. The invention of geometry, seeing by reason of the inundation of the Nile the bounds of their lands could scarce be distinguished, is attributed to them. And i^as mighty in words and deeds. As if he had said. And he was a man e?(actly accomplished with all learning and virtue. M 162 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VII. 23. And when he was full forty years old. Bereschlth Rabba, fol. 115, col. 3: "Moses lived forty years jn Pharaoh's court, and forty in Midian; and the same number of years he ministered unto Israel." See also Shemoth Kabba, fol. 118, col. 3. Wbat Moses did till he was forty years old, the scripture nowhere declareth. Josephus reporteth ' that he was a general in the Ethiopia war, and that when he besieged Saba, he married the king's daughter, by name Tharbis, who was deeply in love with him. Whatever there be of this war, which Theodoret and others say is fabulous, there is no doubt but that Moses has omitted many things con- cerning himself, out of humility. For it is not probable that he gave himself over to laziness and slqggishness during the forty years that he lived at court like a prince. It came into his heart to visit, &c. As much as to say. By a new and extraordinary impulse of the Spirit he was moved to visit his brethren the Israelites, whose spirits were broken with the rigour of their bondage. Philo saith, that Moses used frequently to visit ■ his brethren the Israelites that were groaning under their burden, and that he supported them with comfort, and dealt with the task- masters to be gentle towards them: and that he was thereupon suspected by the king and his court to be one that affected innovations. 24. And seeing one of them. To wit, a Hebrew, whom Rabbi Solomon, by what authority I know not, affirmeth to have been the husband of Shelomith the daughter of Dibri of the tribe of Dan, that is mentioned Lev. xxiv. 11. Suffer wrong. That is, wrongfully beaten, Exod. ii. 11. Some think that this Egyptian who beat the Hebrew > was one of the king's governors, who took account of the Israelites' work, and punished those that were slack. The Jews add, that this Egyptian committed adultery with the wife of that Israelite, who while he was inveighing against this injury of the Egyptian with words, had his mouth stopped by the Egyptian with stripes. He avenged him. That is, by a just revenge he provided for his security. For at that time there was no judge who could redress the injury, and the injury was urgent and could not admit of delay of time. Yet many of the ancient fathers, amongst whom Augustine, lib. xxii., against Faustus, cap. 20, et seq., do accuse Moses of too great zeal and precipitancy. QEcumeniu% on the * Antiq. lib. ii, cap. 5. V£ll. XXVI. J LITEEALLY EXPLAINED. 163 Epistle of Jude, saith, that the devil contended chiefly about the body of Moses as unworthy of burial on that reason chiefly, for that he killed the Egyptian unjustly. Smote the Egyptian. The scripture hath not expressed the manner how he smote him. The ancient Hebrews, as Clemens Alex. Strom, i. testifies, do also fictitiously and fabulously report, that the Egyptian was not killed by Moses with any external weapon, but by the bare pronouncing of the name Jehovah against him ; as Peter did kill Ananias and Saphiras by a mere word. Sulpicius Severus saith,^ " Moses, when he was come to a man's age, seeing a Hebrew beaten by an Egyptian, moved with grief, revenging his brother's wrong, kicked the Egyptian to death." 25. For he supposed, &c. As if he had said, he thought that they would understand, when they saw him so ready to defend his brethren when wronged by their enemies, that they were to be delivered afterwards by God from the tyranny of the Egyptians by his means; which yet they did not understand. By this testimony of Stephen, Moses seems to have killed the Egyptian on this account, as being acquainted with his call to deliver the Israelites from the grievous bondage of the Egyptians ; which the scripture is silent in, Exod. ii. 12. This Augustine observed in his second question on Exodus. 26. And the next day. That is, the next day after that Moses killed the Egyptian, and covered him with sand after he had killed him. , He shewed himself to them as they strove. That is, he saw two Israelites quarrelling, [conspexit duos Hebrseos rixantes] as the Vulgate Latin interpreter renders it, Exod. ii. 13. Jonathan and Eabbi Solomon say, that these two Hebrews that contended were Dathan and Abiram. And he would have set them at one again. Greek, And he forced them to peace, {avvrikaTrig, "a redeemer," but because after many and strange miracles wrought by him in Egypt, when at last the first-born of the Egyptians were slain by the destroying angel, he preserved the people of God by the blood of the Lamb and brought them safe out. " And so," saith Lud. de Dieu " he gave a type of that true price and that true redemption, which believers rejoice to have been purchased for them, by the death of the First-begotten of all the creation, and by the blood of Christ the immaculate Lamb." Se7it hy the hands of the angel. A Hebraism. That is, giving him a command by an angel. 36. He brought them out. He largely publisheth, both the good deeds Moses did for the people, and the honours conferred on him YER. XXXTTIl.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 169 by God ; that so the stubbornness of the people against him might appear the more base, and it might be less to be wondered at, if those who were come of such ungrateful parents were so unnatural and inhuman towards Jesus Christ. Shewed wonders and signs in the land of Egypt. The royal palace of Egypt was at that time Zoan, that is, as the Chaldaaan paraphrast interprets it, Isa. xix. 13, Tanis, whence has its name the Tanitic mouth of the Nile, which some call Saitish, as Strabo testifies, lib. xvii. Asaph testifieth that the miracles were done there by Moses, Psal. Ixxviii. 12, And in the Red Sea. The commoner sort of the literate world think that was called so because its waters are red, whereas this sea according to Q. Curtius ' differs nothing from others in colour; the same in the same place saith, "It had its name from King Erythrus, for which reason the ignorant thought that its waters were red." Agatharcides affirmeth the same in his collections, out of book i.,* Of the Eed Sea. This Erythrus, from whom they say it had its name, was Esau, who from his redness was called Edom, Gren. xxv. 25. These are of equal signification, Erythrus in the Greek, Edom in Hebrew, Ruber in Latin, Red in English, Rouge in French. Hence by the Greeks it is called 'EpvOpa ^a\a(T(ra, in Latin Rubrum Mare, in English Red Sea, in French Mer Rouge; but in the Holy Scripture it is called tjlD 0;, "the sea full of weeds," because it abounds in sea reits f it runs by the land of Edom, that is, Idumea. In this sea Solomon set out that fleet whereof mention is made in 1 Kings ix. 26. ' In the wilderness forty years. This time answereth to those years in which Christ, after his offering up himself on the cross for us, which was typified in the paschal sacrifice, did continue to invite the Jews to faith and repentance, by miracles wrought by ■}(? "^ to walk across one's way. Lev. xxvi. 22, 23, 24, 40, 41. Stephen seems to have had respect to Isaiah Ixiii. 10. With this agreeth that sharp upbraiding of Jer. vii. 24, &c. Ezek. XX. from ver. 5 to the end of the chapter. Nor is the promiscuous multitude only accused of rebellion before God, but the priests, princes, and prophets are upbraided with the same crime, Jer. ii. 8; V, 31; vi. 13; viii. 10; x. 20, 21; xxii. 21, 22; xxiii. 1, 2, 9, 11 — 31; xxxii. 30, 32; Ezek. viii. 12; xxii. 25; Hosea iv. 1; Micah iii. />, &c. Zeph. iii. 1 ; Zech. vii. 11 ; Mai. ii. 8, 11 ; iii. 7. As your fathers did, so do ye. As if he had said, you children have succeeded your fathers in the same wickedness. 52. Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? Excellently Lactantius,> " Prophets were therefore sent by God, both that they might be setters forth of his majesty, and chastisers of men's wickedness. But the precepts of justice are unpleasant ' Instit. i. 4. 186 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VII. to the vicious and evil livers. Therefore they, whq were both accused of sin, and forbid to do it, put them to death, after they had most cruelly tormented them. 1 Kings xix. 10, Elias com- plaineth thus, They have slain thy prophets with the sword, and I, even I only am left, to^ wit of all thoge who came to the knowledge of Ahab's court, and they seek my life to take it away. Neh. ix. 26, They slew thy prophets which testified against them, to twun them to thee. See Matt. v. 12 ; xxi. 35 ; xxiii. 31, 33 ; Luke vi. 23 ; xiii. 34 ; Heb, xi. 37. And they killed. To wit, your fathers, degenerated from the piety of our fathers Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Which shewed before of the coming of the Just One. That is, the messengers that" were sent before the face of Christ that was to be born, "who," as Drusius expresseth it, "is here in a peculiar manner called the Just One ; possibly, because he was innocent, when he was put to death. For p'!"?? is a law term, signifying a supposed guilty person that is yet innocent ; to which is opposed yiO'i, vJToSiKa, a person that^is accused as guilty, and is so indeed, as in that place of David, Psa. cix. 7, Ui2"n nS; 1tD5?i|rr3, when he shall be judged, that is, when he shall contend in judgment, let him be con- demned." Of whom ye, &c. As if he had said, but ye with a combination of wickedness did most wickedly conspire against Christ himself, the author of righteousness and salvation, nor left ye any means unattempted to bring about his death. See above, ch. iii. 13. 53. By the disposition of angels. Greek, "at the appointment of angels,'' that is, angels in the name of God ordaining and enjoin- ing the observation of the law. So the law is said to have been ordained by angels, Gal. iii. 19. And, Heb. ii. 2, it is called the word spoken by angels. And although the law was given principally by one angel sustaining the name and person of God, yet because this was done in a stately manner, many troops of angels having attended him as apparitors, the promulgation of the law in Mount Sina is rightly ascribed to angels. 54. They were cut to the heart. As if he had said, they were enraged with a mad fury, and that unruly and head-strong fury against Stephen broke forth into a gnashing of teeth, as a vehe- ment and violent fire does into a flame. See what we have said above, ch. v. 33. 55. But he being, &c. As much as to say, but Stephen armed VEE. LVII.] LITEEALLY EXPLAINED. 187 with an invincible power of the Spirit, lift up his eyes to heaven, and straight saw a certain resplendency representing the Divine Majesty, and Jesus triumphing in that flesh in which he was abased. 56. / see the heavens opened. The opening of the heavens is a sign previous to visions, Ezek. i. 1. Some of the Hebrews will have nothing else signified by the opening of the heavens, but that any thing is done, or showed by a heavenly power. But the pagans thought that the heaven was also opened by heavenly portents. Livy, lib. xvii. saith, " That the heavens were divided as it were with a great gaping : and that a great light shined out where it was open." And on that of Virgil,' "I see heavens part asunder in the middle," Minellius saith, " That it was divided and opened with a great chasma, or gaping.' Servius :" " Among other prodigies, heaven was said to have parted asunder." And the Son of man, &o. A Hebraism, as if he had said, I see that man Christ Jesus, whom, as despised and the lowest of men, you think destroyed by death, enjoy the government of all things in heaven. Christ appears to Stephen not sitting, but standing on the right hand of God, that he may thereby signify that he is ready to afford him help in that conflict of his for his name. Yet in most other places the phrase of sitting on the right hand, or right hands of God is used, as more fltting to signify the glorious state of Christ, to wit, that majesty and power of ruling all things, which he obtained after his ascension into heaven, before which all must stand and be judged. Augustine saith, that Christ is said to sit, as a judge; and to stand, as our advocate with the Father. 57. Then they cried out with a loud voice, &c. As if he had said. Those of the multitude who were standing by, when they heard this declaration of Christ's glory, breaking out with a horrible noise, as if it had been intolerable blasphemy, they shut their ears, either by putting their fingers therein, or the flap of the ear, I mean, that lowest, and soft part of the ear which the Greeks call AajSoc, fromXa/xj3av£iv, "to take," because the ancients pulled the ear on that part, that they might give any a caution ; hence the poet,^ "Then PhoebuB, thus Nipping my ear, advised." The Hebrews call this part in a sheep S'la, Amos iii. 12 ; in a man Tj^Fi, Exod, xxix. 20, and frequently in Leviticus ; and n;?»N, tail, ' jEneid. ix. ver. 20. ' In Augural, lib. " Viig. Eel, vi. ver. 3, 4. 188 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. VII. in the writings of the Rabbins. Humanists call the flap of the ear, laria, laiina, or lamna : the ancient glossary, lana, Xo/3oe biTiov. the glossary of St. Benedict, Lannee, Xo)3ot: Phlloxenus's Lexicon, Xofibi- wriov, lamna. Of the flap of the ear the Talmud ' speaketh thus, " Wherefore is the whole ear hard, but the flap soft ? That if any hear an immodest word, he may bow his flap, so as to shut his ear." In the same place, speaking of the pointed figure of the fingers, " Wherefore is there in men's fingers a point like to that of a key ? That if any hear an indecent word, he may put his fingers into his ears." And ran upon him with one accord. As if from a judgment of zeal, which, while the commonwealth retained its liberty, they according to the law used against the authors of idolatry, who openly, in the view of many, had given themselves to it. These were presently, without any respite to be stoned, Deut. xiii. 9, 10. " But," saith Grotius, " these men sinned two manner of ways in this particular ; first, against the law, which even while that was a free commonwealth, would not have that popular judgment prac- tised, save only upon the authors of idolatry, which Stephen was not ; and then against the Romans, who had taken away from them all right in matters of life and death. And the boldness of those men whom Josephus calls zealots increasing daily, both incensed the Romans, and was the occasion of the destruction both of their city and temple." See the same Grotius on the now cited place of Deuteronomy, and book 10th of the Right of War and Peace, chap. 20, Num. 5, 9. 58. And cast him out of the city, and stoned him. That is, and after they had cast him out of the city, they stoned him as a blasphemous person. Rabbi Moses de Kotzi ' doth thus describe the ceremony of stoning by tradition : " The wise men say that a man used to be stoned naked, but not so a woman; that their' clothes used to be pulled off' at four cubits distance from the place where they were stoned, their secret parts being only covered before. The place of stoning was twice the height of a man, to which place he that was to be stoned went up with his hands bound. Then one of the witnesses beating him upon the loins, threw him headlong upon the earth. By which, if he was not killed, the witnesses lifted up a stone that was set there ; it was just so much as two men could carry, which one of the witnesses > In Tract, mains, fol. 5, 2. ' Pracept. Jubente, 99. VBK. LTtll.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 189 rolled down upon him with violence. And if there was life still left in him, all the people stoned him." Talmud Hieros. fol. 23, 1, Babyl. Sanhed. fol. 42, 2, " The place of stoning was without the council house, according to that of Lev. xxiv. 14, ' Carry out the blasphemous person without the camp.' Tradition. The place of stoning was without the three camps. Glossary. The court was the camp. of divine presence, the mountain of the temple, the camp of the Levites: Jerusalem, the camp of the Israelites." E. Moses Maimonides, in the treatise of the Edifice of the temple, 0. 7, n. 7, saith, " There were three sorts of camps in the wilder- ness, that of the Israelites, which was divided into four partitions ; that of the Levites, of which mention is made Num. i. 50, And shall encamp round about the tabernacle ; and that of God, without the gate of the court, in the tabernacle of the covenant." And in reference to these afterwards ; " that space which lay betwixt the gate of Jerusalem and the mountain of the temple, answered to the camp of the Israelites; the space betwixt the gate of the mountain of the temple and the gate of the court, which was the same that was called Nicanor's gate, answered to that of the Levites: and the space that was about the gate of the court, represented the camp of God." My brother Lewis Du Veil, in his most elegant Latin translation of the same Maimonides on the treatise of the manner of going up to the temple, c. 3, num. 2, hath most learnedly noted : " That that is true, we may learn from the apostle, who in the last chapter of the Epistle to the Hebrews, ver. 11, 12, 13, speaketh thus: For the bodies of those beasts, whose blood is brought into the sanctuary by the high priest for sin, are burned without the camp. Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate. Let us go forth therefore unto him without the camp, bearing his reproach." And the witnesses. To wit, that they might be in readiness to cast the first stone, according as the law enjoined, Deut. xvii. 7, "Although therefore," saith Beza, "all these things were done tumultuously, and that not without violation of the governor of the province's authority, yet they would seem to do nothing but what the law of God enjoined them. Josephus, Antiq. xx. 8, declareth that while Albinus Festus's successor governed Judea, Ananias the high priest with the like boldness caused James, the brother of the Lord, to be stoned; on the account of which wicked- ness the priesthood was taken from him, and conferred on one 190 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VII. Jesus." Excellent is that of Calvin, on the now cited place of Deuteronomy : " Not without reason would God have the guilty die by their hands, by whose testimony they were condemned. Executioners were not made use of among the people of ancient times, that in punishing the wicked there might be a greater sense of religion, modesty, and reverence. But God especially committed this charge to the witnesses, because the tongue of a great many is precipitant, not to say blabbing, so that they would make no scruple to kill one with their words, whom they durst not so much as touch with their finger. It was therefore an excellent expedient for restraining this lightness, not to receive the testimony of any, unless his hand were ready to execute judgment." Their clothes. To wit, their upper or outer garments. Greek, TO iiiaria. Lud, de Dieu, on John xiii. 4, saith, " Although to Ifxanov in the singular number signifieth sometimes a cloak, yet to, IfiaTia in 'the plural number, is not, that I know of, used to signify one cloak. Nor is there any fear of their being naked. For seeing in those hot countries they made use of most fine stuff, they put on several garments one upon |another, that the force of the sun- beams might not easily penetrate them, which yet they easily put off, when they had occasion so to do. Next to the body was n:in3, ' the shirt ;' above it O'^Diaa, * the breeches ;' over it xbaDN, 'the robe,' a garment that hung down to the ankle; to which was added mja, ' the girdle,' wherewith they girded it, that it might not hinder them in their walking ; above all these was, b-ya or taitana, 'the cloak.' Suppose then that our Lord laid aside his cloak and robe, it is rightly expressed in the plural number, to. Ifiaria, 'his clothes,' and yet he was not naked. But also our Lord is rightly said to have been naked by a phrase usual among the Eastern nations, where he is said to be naked who hath put off his robe, although at the same time he hath both his shirt, or inner coat, and breeches on him. Thus King Saul sang naked before Samuel, 1 Sam. xix. 24. Thus Peter was naked in the boat, John xxi. 7, who therefore is said to have put on kiriv^vrrfv, not certainly his innermost garment or shirt, but, as its name intimates, that which was put on above the other, to wit, his robe, which, as we said, was made fast about them with the girdle; whence it is also said, rov hrtvSvTJtv SiE^uiaaro, 'he girded his upper coat.' " Youriff man. Saul, who is here called vsavlac, " a young man," VER. LIX.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 191 was, according to Chrysostom, upwards of thirty years of age when he kept the clothes of the witnesses that were laid down at his feet. And truly, a little after, when he was converted to the faith of Christ, he is called by Ananias, avjjp, « a man," ch. ix. 13. Nor is it likely the high priest would have conferred so much power on a young man, when he was yet under tutors, against the Christians. See the same ch. ix. 2 ; and Paul himself below, ch. xxvi. 4, testifieth that he spent all his youthful years among the Jews before his conversion. Estius on the Epistle of Philemon, saith, " That Saul the persecutor was called a youth, or rather a young man, veavlav, from the age of youth, which reaches to the thirty-fifth year, or as others say, even to the fortieth." Cicero, when he pleaded Sextus Roscius's cause, calls himself a young man, when yet at that time, according to Gellius,' he was twenty-seven years of age. Antonius, bishop of Grass, in France, in the life of Paul, writeth that he was thirty-three years of age when he persecuted the church of Christ. From that time to the eleventh year of the reign of Nero, when Paul in bonds wrote the Epistle to Philemon, by Onesimus his servant, according to bishop Usher's chronology, were thirty years ; and therefore, Paul, then above the age of sixty, does rightly call himself Paul the aged, seeing as we have noted on Joel i. 2, he who was sixty years old, was called an old man by the Hebrews. W^iose name was Saul. This Hebrew, born of the Hebrews, descended of the tribe of Benjamin, born at Tarsus in Cilicia (which city, that it was then famous for the study of philosophic and liberal sciences, is confirmed by the authority of Strabo)^ by sect a Pharisee, and the son of a Pharisee, did at this time apply himself to the study of the law in the synagogue of the Cilicians at Jerusalem, and frequented the school of Gamaliel, a doctor of the greatest repute among the Pharisees ; being a strict observer of the law of God, as also of the traditions of their fathers. See below, ch. xxi. 39; xxii. 3; xxiii. 6 — 34; xxvi. 4, 5. 2 Cor. xi. 22. Gal. i. 14, Phil. iii. 5, 6. 59. And they stoned Stephen, calling. To wit, upon the Lord Jesus, as is plain by the subsequent words. The most learned Curcellseus saith, ^ " There is no small weight in these words of Christ, John xiv. 13, 14 : Whatsoever 'ye shall ask : and. If ye shall ask anything in my name, I will do it. For he could not hear * Lib. XV. cap. 28. ' Lib. xiv. ' Institut. lib. v. cap. 21, num. 21. 192 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VII. the prayers of his servants, and grant what they ask, if he had no power. Hence it appears that that, If ye ash anything in my name, is to be understood of prayers immediately directed to him ; as if he had said. If ye ask anything of me, relying on my power and promise. Otherwise there is no question but we may, yea, it is our bounden duty to direct our prayers to God the Father, in the name of Jesus Christ, as we are taught, John xvi. 23. But of such prayers it is not spoken in this place. Therefore also Stephen made no scruple to call upon Him, even while he was a dying, saying. Lord Jesus, receive my spirit. Where they ridicu- lously shift, who will have the word Jesu to be of the genitive case ; as if Stephen had not directed his prayers to Jesus himself, but to Grod the Father, who is the Lord of Jesus. For, besides that Jesus Christ in the writings of the New Testament is always denoted by the name of Lord, to distinguish him from God the Father, even the use of the Greek tongue doth not permit that in that phrase, Kupis 'Ijj(70u, the latter word 'Ijjctou should be of the genitive case ; for then it must have had an article prefixed to it, and been expressed tov 'Ijjo-ou, to distinguish the person of Jesus from God the Father ; otherwi'fee there is no person skilful in that language, who can take that phrase otherwise than in the vocative case, as Rev. xxii. 20." 60. And he kneeled down. As was usual in fervent prayers, especially in datigersi Lord, &c. " The blessed Stephen," saith Ambrose,' " by his faith did not seek Christ upon earth, but viewed him standing on the right hand of God : there he found him where he sought him with devotion of mind. But Stephen not only sees Christ in heaven, but toucheth him also by his martyrdom. For he toucheth the Lord while he prayeth for his enemies, and as it were holding him with his faith, he saith. Lord, lay not this sin to their charge. Understand therefore how great glory there is in true devotion. Mary Magdalene, John xx. 17, though standing near our Lord, does not touch him : Stephen, while upon earth, toucheth Christ in heaven ; she seeth not a present Christ among the angels : Stephen among the Jews beholdeth his Lord while absent.'' Lay not. Greek, (XTnaigQ. " Verbally rendered," saith Grotius, " it is ' weigh not.' " So Ezra viii. 25 — 32 ; Job xxviii. 15 ; Jer. xxxii. 9, 10; Zech. xi. 12. This verb [(jTavai, "to account, or * Ser. £6, De Tempore. TER. I.j LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 193 appoint," is instead of the Hebrew ijp"!?', which, 1 Kings xx. 39, is translated rltiv, 'to weigh;' Exod. xxii. 17, airorkiv, 'to render;' Isa. Iv. 2, Ttfiaa^tti, ' to weigh.' Anciently money was heavy brass, which used first to be weighed, and then paid. Thence orafljuoe, in Greek, a weight, in Latin, libripens, impendia, expenscB, pendere, pensiones, and the like. But because in balancing accounts, that which I charge another with, does discharge me as much as if I had weighed it, that is, paid it, hence it is that i&rdtr^ai, signifies ' to charge.' And by reason of the similitude which sins have to money-debts, as he is said to " pay punishments'' who suffers them, so he is said ' to charge,' or ' impute,' who will exact them, 'not to impute,' who will not exact them. But in this place, charge not, or /ay not, imports thus much. Do not make so great an account of this sin, as to block up their way to conversion, even as in that saying of Christ, Luke xxiii. 34." He fell asleep. That is, he died. In the Lord. That is, For the Lord, or for Christ's cause. The Hebrews do so use ^. In the Lord, is not in the Greek text. CHAPTER Vni. 1. Saul, &c. Being about to speak of the persecution of the church of Jerusalem, forthwith he mentioneth Saul, who was the principal cause of that persecution, therewithal declaring upon what account he was induced to persecute the faithful members of Christ who lived at Jerusalem, viz., because he did consent to the death of Stephen, or rather, because he was, as the Greek text hath it, avvevioKwv, " delighted together :" that is, as a zealous Pharisee, together with the stoners of Stephen, he was delighted at his death, of which in the foregoing chapter. So that truly, after he once tasted the blood of the faithful, he thirsted more insatiably after the same, and was the more provoked to lay his hands on them. At that time. That is, about that time. In the church. That is, against the church. ^ All. Who had embraced the faith of Christ, and consisted of Bome thousands. o 194 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VIII. Were scattered abroad throughout the countries of Judea and Samaria. That is, through the towns and villages of Samaria, strictly so called. Some of these believers so scattered abroad, not long after went unto Damascus, below chap. ix. 19, 25, among whom was Ananias, a religious man according to the law, and having a testimony of all the Jews that dwelt thereabouts ; below, chap, xxii. 12. Some went unto Rome itself peradventure, and among these Andronicus and Junius, kinsmen of Saul the persecutor, and who before him embraced the faith of Christ, Kom. xvi. 7. Some finally went even unto Phoenice, Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word of the Lord unto the Jews only, below, chap. xi. 19, to those, viz., that were scattered abroad in those places among the nations, James i. 1 ; 1 Pet. i. 1 . Except the apostles. Who stayed at Jerusalem, that with an invincible constancy they might there profess themselves to be the witnesses and preachers, by the special appointment of God, of those things which they did assuredly know by hearing and seeing of Christ, the Saviour of mankind. 2. They took care, &c.' As if he should have said. The devout men took care of Stephen's burial together, and did witness both by words and great store of tears, how grievously and bitterly they took his death, who did in no ways deserve it at their hand. Which, notwithstanding, it is not once to be doubted but that they did do it moderately enough, seeing they were well acquainted with the precepts of Christ, which among other things also did forbid immoderate grief. See 1 Thess. iv, 13. 3. Saul, &c. Luke returneth again to describe the persecution of the faithful of the church of Jerusalem, as if he should have said. In so great outrageousness of the bloody Jews against the church of Christ, Saul did more waste it than the rest : for having received power from the Sanhedrim, not only when the saints were put to death by him did he give his voice against them, but also he, entering into every house, and hailing thence both men and wom«n, did bind them and commit them into prison, and did beat them often through all synagogues, and so for fear he forced some to blaspheme by denying Christ ; he persecuted others, con- stant in the faith, to death. So cruel and furious is the vehemency of the zeal which is not according to knowledge. See below, * [Geneva version : Then certeyne men fearing God carted Steuen amongs them to be buried. Rheims: And deuout men tooke order for Sieuens funeral.} VER. IX. J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 195 ch. ix. 13, 21, xxii. 4, 5, 19, xxvi. 9, 10, 11; Gal. i. 13, 23; Phil. iii. 6 ; 1 Tim. i. 13, 4. Therefore they that were scattered abroad. For the perse- eution raised at Jerusalem. Passed over. That is, travelled over divers places. Preaching the word of God. That is. Preaching and declaring wherever they came the doctrine of Christ, confirmed hy his and his apostles' miracles. Which manner of preaching of the gospel is granted to any Christian that is well catechized in the Christian doctrine; yea, rather charity, which we owe to others estranged from it, and the love of spreading the glory of God, requireth the self-same from every Christian. 5. Philip. He, who above, ch. vi. 5, is reckoned the second in the register of deacons, and below, ch. xxi. 8, is called an evan- gelist. Going down unto the city of Samaria. That is to say. Coming down into Sebaste, which commonly was called Samaria, or, if we credit famous Lightfoot's conjectures, into Sychem, which at that time was the metropolitan, or mother city of all Samaria. See what we have spoken of Samaria above, ch. i. 6. Did preach Christ unto them. That is, did bring tidings of the comfortable gospel of Christ to the inhabitants of that city. 6. And the people gave heed, &c. As if he should have said, A great multitude of men and women, with one accord did consent unto the doctrine preached by Philip, having heard the miracles which elsewhere he had wrought ; and having seen those which he did work, while they did see him. 7. Many, &c. As if he should have said, Because many possessed with evil spirits were released from their tyranny, the devils themselves showing that they were thrust out of the possessed against their will, and very many others that had p^alsies, or lame hands or feet, were healed. 8. And there was great joy in that city. Both for the benefit of the cures, and for the grace of the gospel. 9. But there was a certain man called Simon. By surname Gltheus, from Gitta, a village of Samaria, where he was born. Which before time. That is, before Philip the deacon had como down from Jerusalem to Samaria, Was in the city. Of which the former verse makes mention, A sm-cerer. That is, working such effects by diabolical art, o 2 196 THE ACTS OK THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VIII. which he could not work, neither by a divine, nor natural power. Seducing the nation of Samaria. As if he should have said, And by this means it came to pass that he enchanted and bewitched the nation of the Samaritans. ' Giving out that himself was some great one. That is, loftily boasting. The scholiast of Horace upon the first epistle of the second book: "Like a conjurer, let him promise to do great things." 10. To whom they all gave heed from the least to the greatest. That is. All for the most part believed his enchantments, not only the Samaritans of the baser and poorer sort, but also of the more worthy and higher sort. There is no respect here had, by the words of the least and greatest, to age, but unto the state or con- dition, as Deut. i. 17 ; Ps. cxv. 13. .Saying, &c. As if he should say, That they were so fuUy persuaded that Simon himself was that power of God, which every nation worships as the highest. " Simon did say," salys Irenseus, in his first book, ch. xx., " That he was the highest power, that is, he who is Father above all things." 11. And to him they had regard. As if he should say, Simon had so great authority among the Samaritans. By his sorceries. That is, by his magic bewitchings. Had bewitched. That is, had driven them unto madness. Satan can work so much by his instruments upon the minds of men, when God permits him. 12. But when they believed. To wit, the Samaritans, being delivered from their madness. Preaching the things, &c. That is, to him preaching that most blessed heavenly state, which by the grace of God, through the merits of Jesus Christ, they were about to obtain, who did most steadfastly believe the promises of the same Christ, and did most, constantly obey his precepts. Luke above, ver. 5, did more briefly express the sum of the gospel by the preaching of Christ ; here more fully, by the preaching of the kingdom of God, and of the name of Jesus Christ; but the sense in both places is the same; for Christ brings us back, reconciles, restores us into favour with God : afterwards regenerates us by his Spirit ; that Satan being overthrown, God may reign in us, and that we, being renewed unto spiritual righteousness, and dead unto the world, may live a VER. XIV. J LITEKALLY EXPLAINED. 197 heavenly life in the earth, and at length may obtain eternal blessedness in the heavens. They were baptized. That is, they were dipped in the water, according to Christ's command, Mark xvi. 16. Both men and women. Who, viz., did profess themselves to have embraced the Christian religion ; but not infants, who seeing they do not at all understand the gospel preached, they cannot consent unto it, that is, they cannot believe. See what we have said above, oh, ii, 38, 41, and what we shall say below, ver. 37, 38. 13. Then Simon. That man in times past so perverse, and notoriously wicked. Himself believed also. The doctrine of the gospel preached by Philip, to wit, with a temporary faith, if those things be true which the fathers have written concerning the same Simon. See Mark iv. 17 ; Luke viii. 13. And when he was baptized. That is, and when he had professed his faith publicly, by being dipped in the water, according to Christ's commandment. He joined himself to Philip. That is, he departed not from Philip's side, and gave heed both continually and daily to his preaching. Beholding the signs and miracles which were done. That is. The miracles which were wrought by Philip through the power of God, for the confirmation of the doctrine preached by him. Being amazed, wondered. Such truly is the force of the Spirit of God, that it can move the hearts of the most wicked men, and draw them into amazement. 14. When. As if he should have said, But the apostles, who, as is said above, ver. 1, tarried at Jerusalem when the rest of the faithful were scattered abroad from thence, being informed of the conversion of the Samaritans unto the faith of Christ, sent Peter and John out of their company unto Samaria, by consent of them all, to the end that they might lay their hands on the Samaritans, and so might give them the singular gifts of the Holy Spirit, as appears by that which follows. By the way, hence we may see that Peter was not a monarch of the apostolical college and of the whole church, for the ambassador uses not to be greater and higher than he that sends him. I do reckon the pope will not suffer himself to be sent in embassy anywhere by his cardinals and fellow bishops. 198 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VIII. 15. Who. Peter, to wit, and John. When they were come. Yiz., unto the city of Samaria, in which Philip the deacon had preached the gospel of Christ. Prayed for them. The Samaritans. Hence we may see that the power of bestowing the gifts of the Holy Spirit is not in the power of the apostles, but in the power of God and Christ ; for otherwise there was no need of Peter and John's prayers. That they might receive the Holy Ghost. That is, those excellent gifts of the Holy Spirit, with which everywhere they who be- lieved in Christ, and not only they who were to preach the gospel and govern the church, were then wonderfully gifted ; that having obtained the gift of prophesying, and speaking with divers tongues, they might confirm the doctrine of Christ, which then was new. See above, ch. ii. 38, and below, x. 44 — 46, xix. 6 ; 1 Cor. xii. 8—10. 16. For as yet he was not come upon any of them. As if he should say, None of these Samaritans as yet was gifted with those excellent gifts, in which God did present, or show, as it were, the visible presence of his Spirit for a time to his church, that he might confirm the authority of his gospel for ever, and that he might witness that his Spirit is to be alway the chief ruler, and director of believers. Were baptized, &c. As if he shotild say, Although they had now believed in Christ, and had professed publicly their faith, by being baptized with water, according to the commandment of Christ. And hence we may see that those extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit, are neither tied to the sincerity of faith, nor to baptism of water lawfully received, so far are they from being conferred by any virtue of faith or baptism of water. 17. TTien laid they their hands. Many nations had a custom, but chiefly the Jews, to point out the most excellent things, not only with Avords, but also with visible signs ; hence ariseth laying on of hands, when by prayers the divine power was invocated for another. See Gen. xlviii. 14, 15; Matt. ix. 18, xix. 13, 14; Mark x. 16 ; but God was wont to give this honour to his prophets, as to bestow his gifts upon others, at the prayers of the prophets, of which prayers imposition of hands was a symbol. So Moses was commanded to lay his hands on Joshua, that he by that means might receive the larger gifts of the Spirit at the prayers of Moses, Numb, xxvii. 18, 20. Naaman, the Syrian prince, con- VtiR. XX.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 199 joineth calling on God's name with laying on of hands, 2 Kings V. 11. Even so, God, being called upon by his apostles, did bestow those singular gifts at the laying on of their hands, with which he gifted the most part of the faithful, at the beginning of the preaching of the gospel, that they might be a most sure sign of the faith of those that were converted to Christ, and an un- doubted token of the verity of the doctrine of Christ. " Let us remember," excellently says Calvin, " that the laying on of hands was the instrument of God, at which time he did give the visible graces of his Spirit to his own. But since the church hath been deprived of such riches, to wit, the visible graces of his Spirit, laying on of hands would be but an unprofitable image." And they received the Holy Ghost. As if he should have said, God did give unto the Samaritans converted unto Christ, and dipped into the water, according to his precept, at the prayers of the apostles, and their laying on of hands, the graces of his Spirit, wherewith they, being gifted, could prophesy, and do wonders, such as are mentioned, 1 Cor. xii. 18. And when he had seen, &c. That is, when Simon Magus perceived that those on whom the apostles laid their hands, did as surely receive the gifts of the Spirit, as if those gifts had been in the apostles' power, he will buy this power of giving those peculiar graces unto them on whom he should lay his hands. And indeed, because Simon did reckon the heavenly gift such a vile thing, that he first under the gospel did attempt to purchase it with money, the giving and receiving of an earthly price for an holy and spiritual thing is called simony, q. 1, c. 1, Presbyter ; and q. 1, c. 3, Altare. The canonists, notwithstanding, out of the opinion of the schoolmen, called the buyers of holy things, simo- niacal persons, the sellers Giezites, from Giezi, Heb. Gehazi, the servant of Elisha the prophet, 2 Kings v. 20, &c. 19. Give me, &c. He will not buy the gifts of the Holy Spirit, that were commonly given to believers, but that gift wherewith the apostles alone being endued, to wit, that at their prayers those gifts were bestowed on whomsoever they laid their hands, as if that could be prized that is dearer than all gold. 20. Thy money, &c. As if he should say. Thy money offered to such a wicked [use, being as it were altogether infected and polluted with the contagion of the wickedness of thy profane mind, abide with thee, and perish with thee in the same destruction. 200 THE ACTS OF THD HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VIII. which unless thou repent, shall surely befall thee ; seeing that thou dost so contemptuously undervalue the Spirit of 'God, that thou wouldest set to wicked sale his inestimable gift, given freely unto us to illustrate the glory of Christ by our ministry. Bede, and the common gloss have observed, that the words of Peter are not so much a curse as a threatening, or threatening prediction ; but that it is conditionally to be understood in respect of the person of Simon, is made manifest below, ver. 22. 21, Thou hast, &c. As if he should say, For neither as thou art now disposed, canst thou be either partaker or sharer of that eternal life which we do preach. Peter gives an account why he thundered forth a detestable prediction against Simon Magus so confidently, even now in the foregoing verse. In this preaching. To wit, preached by us, of obtaining eternal life, by a sincere and lively faith in Christ. This preaching is everywhere called the gospel and the word of God. See above, ver. 4, 14. , For thy heart is not right in the sight of God. Many who are not of a right heart in the sight of God, oftentimes excel in gifts of the Spirit, for neither did the perverseness, and hypocrisy of Judas the traitor hinder, him to excel in the gifts of the Spirit : neither had the gifts of the Spirit been so corrupted, 1 Cor. xiv. if their hearts had been sincere and estranged from all wickedness. Peter, therefore, doth not give the cause why Simon could not partake of the gifts of the Spirit, as those do suppose, who do think by the name of preaching, to be signified, by a Hebraism, the gifts of the Holy Spirit, but why he could not obtain eternal life, promised in the gospel and preached by the apostles ; because truly God is the searcher of hearts, who doth not save any, except the upright in heart; he seeth his heart to b,e wicked and perverse, and by crooked windings or backgoings, to have turned from the sincerity of the gospel. 22. Repent therefore, &c. As if he should have said. If there- fore thou wilt be acquitted of that punishment which doth abide for thee, repent forthwith of thy wickedness; and, having cast off all perverseness and hypocrisy, do thou uprightly and sincerely direct all thy actions up to the rule of the doctrine of the gospel preached by us, and come to God, to entreat him that he would mercifully pardon that guileful device of thy heart, to abuse wickedly the gifts of his Spirit into profane gain. The particle, ' VER. XXIV. J UTEllALLY EXPLAINED. 201 if perhaps, in this place does not signify any doubt, but how much difficulty and labour Simon is to have in entreating against the punishment of his wicked deed. "Therefore," says Calvin, "Peter does not strike a fear upon Simon that might subvert or overthrow this confidence of obtaining in his heart, or trouble him; but causing unto him an undoubted hope, if he should beg it humbly, and from his heart, only for the cause of stirring up of ferventness, ^putteth him in remembrance that pardon for the heinousness of his offence was difficult. It is necessary that our faith shine before us in going to God : even that it may be the mother of praying." 23. In the gall of bitterness, &C. Gr. tie jag xokriv iriKgiag. The interpreters take tic, in, with the accusative case for iv, in, with the ablative, which elsewhere I confess is necessary, whether it may be so here, I doubt ; for tt? may contain a Hebraism, as it is, Isa. i. 31, and the strong shall be ■np'i>,for tow, that is, as tow, and his work for a spark, that is, as a spark. 2 Cor. vi. 18, / shall be unto you tig ■jraTipa,for a father, that is, as a father, and ye shall be unto me, tig v'lovg koI ^vjaTipaq, for sons and daughters, that is, sons and daughters. So in this place, Peter saith more emphatically, that Simon is the pure gall of bitterness, and a mere bond of iniquity, than to be in the gall of bitterness, and bond or band of iniquity. As if he should say, I see thee wholly, how great soever thou art, to abound with sins, and to be entangled almost with inextricable vices. In the words of Peter there are two very elegant metaphors, whereof the first seems to be taken out of Deut. xxix. 18; xxxii. 32; the other to be taken out of Isa. Iviii. 6, See the like phrases, 2 Tim. ii. 26 ; Heb. xii. 15. 24. Pray ye to the Lord for me. Simon did feel that he was such within as Peter did say. Therefore when he did judge Peter, and his fellow John, to be signally honoured with grace and love by our Lord Jesus, and to be dear unto God, he will use their prayer as they did use Job's prayer, who did injure him. That none of these things which ye have spoken come upon me. To wit, above, ver. 20 ; but although one only, Peter, is said to have spoken, John, notwithstanding, did approve of his words, or spoke like to them. " Now," says Calvin, " a question doth arise, what is to be thought of Simon ? The scripture leads us no further than unto a conjecture, that he yielded unto the rebuke, and being touched with the sense of his sin, fearing the judgment of God, 202 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. VIII. afterward betakes himself unto the mercy of God, and com- mendeth himself to the prayers of the church. These being cer- tainly not the least signs of penitence, therefore we may conjecture he did repent ; and that, notwithstanding the ancients with one consent do write that he was a grievous adversary to Peter after- ward, and that he did dispute with him three days at Rome. There is a written disputation that goes under the name of Clement, but which contains such unpleasant dotings, that it is a wonder Christian ears can bear it. Afterwards Augustine showeth unto Januarius, that there were divers and fabulous reports spread about that matter in his time at Rome : wherefore there is nothing safer than having renounced uncertain opinions, simply to embrace what is written in the scripture. What elsewhere we have read written concerning Simon, may deservedly be suspected for many causes." Epiphanius counteth it among the heresies of Simon, that he said the Old Testament was from an evil god ; when, notwithstanding, a great many other fathers do write of him, that he did say that he himself was the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and in the person of the Father he did give the law to the Jews upon Mount Sinai, and that he did appear in the person of the Son in the time of Tiberius, and did suffer an imaginary death, and that afterwards he did descend in fiery tongues in the person of the Holy Spirit upon the apostles; and that Christ neither did come, nor did suffer any thing by the Jews. Again, others do write that he did teach that he himself was God, and descended in Samaria as the Father, and did appear to the Jews as the Son, in the rest of the nations he did descend as the Holy Ghost. Ignatius unto the Trallians, calls Simon Magus, " The first begotten son of the serpent, that was the prince of wickedness." Justin Martyr telleth us ^ that at Rome, in the island of ^sculapius in the river of Tiber, betwixt the two bridges, that the same Simon was rewarded with a statue and altar, having this inscription in Latin letters, "To Simon, the holy God." Photius says, in his Epist. xxxviii., that Simon did carry an image of Christ about him. Epiphanius, Haer. 21, telleth us, that he brought in the worship of images. We may see in Bede, in the fifth book of his His- tory of England, chap, xxviii., thaf^a certain kind of shaving was invented by him. From him, says Augustine,' did come the ' Apol. 2, ad Antoninum. ' Hjer. 39. VER. XXV.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 203 Angelics, so called, because they did worship angels religiously, whom the apostle rebukes, Col. ii. 18. The which heresy, Theo- doret writes, that it did arise in the apostles' time, on the cited place of the blessed Paul : and that the thirtieth canon of the council of Laodicea, is to be understood concerning the same heretics, who in the same country of Asia did build oratories to St. Michael the archangel. From him did also proceed the CoUy- ridians, who did worship Christ's mother with divine honour ; wit- ness Epiphanius. Simon did say that how many soever believed in him, do not fear the threats of the law, but act whatsoever they act as freemen : for they were not to obtain salvation by good works, but by grace. Theodoret declareth that of him in his Abridgment of Heresies. It is manifest, out of Origen's book against Celsus, that the disciples of Simon did deny Jesus to be the Son of God; and the same Origen, in his sixth book against Celsus, testifies unto us that he did shun martyrdom, and without difference worship idols. The same Simon is reported to have had for a companion of his crimes one Selene, that is, the moon, or as others call her Helen, a harlot of Tyre, whom after he had taken out of the custom-house, that he might commend her to all, as Numa Pompilius his Egeria, he did call her goddess, the Holy Spirit, and divine good pleasure, and did affirm that of her he did beget angels, and that the Trojan war in time past was undertaken for her, who is that lost sheep whom he came down from heaven for to seek, having disguised his form of god, that the angels that are over every one of the heavens might not know him. Let the belief of all these, and other things, which are reported of Simon, lie upon the authors' credit. 25. And they indeed. To wit, Peter and John, who were lately sent thither from Jerusalem. Testified, and preached the word of God. As if he should say. After they had faithfully uttered what things they had learned from our Lord Christ, that the sure authority of the gospel doctrine, preached by Philip the deacon, might continue, and flourish, as a well-witnessed and authentical verity. Hence it is manifest there- fore, that not only Peter and John came down to Samaria, from Jerusalem, that they might enrich the Samaritans with the gifts of the Holy Spirit, but also that they might establish them in the faith they had even now received, by approving of the doctrine of Philip. 204 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VIII. And preached the gospel in many villages of the Samaritans. As if he should say, they preached the gospel in many of the towns of the Samaritans, through which they went. 26. And the angel, &c. Our Lord Jesus in his unparalleled clemency and mercy useth one of the heavenly messengers, who now are subject unto him since he is gone into heaven, 1 Pet. iii. 22, to communicate that knowledge that bringeth salvation unto men. Spake unto Philip. Viz., the deacon, and now an evangelist, who in Samaria first preached the doctrine of Christ, and declared it to be true by miracles. Arise, &c. The angel neither speaking any thing rashly, nor concealing any thing craftily, expresseth unto Philip whither he must go to try his obedience, and shows him what Christ would have him to do ; with what profit, and unto what end, he hideth, and keepeth it secret from him. So whosoever, committing their success unto the Lord, shall go wherever he shall command him, he shall find by experience that it shall happily prosper, whatever thing he undertaketh at his command. Unto Gaza. Gaza is the pure Hebrew word, n|y. This name signifies " fortified, strong." The Seventy are wont to pronounce the letter ain by g, and sometimes they omit it, whence this city of Phcenicia is called Aza, or Gaza ; in ancient times it did belong to the Philistines, afterwards to the Jews, for Judah took it, Judges i. 18; afterwards in process of time Alexander the Great did van- quish it, in besieging of which, he received a wound upon his shoulders, as Arrian doth write in his second book concerning Alexander's expedition, whose situation he doth thus describe, " Gaza is distant from the sea about twenty furlongs, and there is a sandy and deep ascent unto it ; and the sea that is near the city is slimy ; the city itself is great, and situated on a high hill, and compassed about with a strong wall, it is the utmost inhabited to one that goeth out of Phoenicia unto Egypt, at the entrance of the wilderness." At length Alexander king of the Jews, who also was called Janneus, Aristobolus's brother, did demolish it : witness Josephus.- Samson, or Simson, of old a judge of the Hebrews, did make this city famous by his noble acts, and death. Judges xvi.; from the situation of this, the new Gaza is little distant, as we learn by Justus the Hebrew, and Dominicus Marius Niger in his ' Antiq. lib. iii. c. 21. VEE. XXVII.] LITKEALLY EXPLAINED. 205 fourth book. It was called Constantia, in the time of Constantlne the Great, from Constantia his sister, as Eusebius informeth us in his Chronicle. From this town were Procopius Gazseus, also Timotheus Gazseus, who, as Suidas writes, flourished under Anastasius the emperor. Nathan, the false prophet, did arise in it about the year of our Lord, 1666, who together with his false Messiah, Sebathai Sebi, did deceive the foolish Jews, not those whom " Titan of better clay their inwarda framed." Men, and more especially fools, do believe what things they do desire. This is desert. A Hebraism, that is, which is desert. Some refer this unto the way, which in respect of the other way, leading to the same place, was not very common, for the wilderness of Maunt Casius lies between them, as Strabo does write in his sixteenth book. Others rather unto the ancient Gaza, which remained desert from Jamneius, or Jannseus's time. Strabo, who flourished about the time of Tiberius, beareth witness that this Gaza was not inhabited about the time Luke wrote these things ; in that, notwithstanding, he was deceived, that he did think it remained desert from the time of Alexander the Great. 27. And he arose, and went, &c. As if he should say. Being about to obey the voice of the angel, he went presently whither he was commanded. And behold a man of Ethiopia. That is, a certain man of Ethiopia, which, as it is thought, is now called the kingdom of the Abyssines. Zaga Zabo, bishop of the Abyssines, in Damianus k Goes ; " We," says he, "did receive baptism almost before all other Christians, from the eunuch of Candace, Queen of Ethiopia, whose name was Indich." Irenaeus in his third book, ch. xxi. Eusebius in his second book, ch. i. Hierome on Isaiah li. testify, that the seeds of the gospel were sown by this eunuch among the Ethiopians, and were afterward adorned, and further spread abroad among them by Matthew the Evangelist. An eunuch. This Greek name is derived from evvrj, which signifies a bed, and ex^j I have: which signifies a groom of the chamber. Powerful. Greek, Swdarrig- Cicero uses this Greek word in his eleventh Philippic oration, Seneca in his Thyeste. It is 206 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VIII. rendered by Tertullian in his book concerning the resurrection of the flesh, potentator, that is, a man of great authority. Under Candace qtieen of the Ethiopians. Pliny, in his sixth book of his Natural History, ch. xxix. saith that Candace was a common name to all the queens of Ethiopia, which had passed unto them for many years since. Ludovicus de Dieu says, " That this queen's proper name was called Lacasa; the catalogue of the Ethiopian kings doth affirm it, which, Marianus Reatinus doth subjoin unto his grammar; although little credit be to be given unto that catalogue, because it is stuffed very full of fables and trifles." Who had the charge of all her treasures. The Greek word is thought to be a Persian word, signifying riches, moveable goods, a common treasure, and whatsoever thing we possess. That eunuch then was the keeper of the queen's money, or principal officer of the queen's treasure, which is wont to be called treasurer. The Ethiopian interpreter addeth, that this eunuch was governor of the city of Gaza. And had come to Jerusalem for to worship. This eunuch had come to sacrifice to the true God in the place consecrated by the law to his solemn worship, being either a Jew by descent, although born in Ethiopia, or a proselyte ; for Cornelius was the first-fruits of the uncircumcision, below, ch. x. 28. Was returning, &c. As if he should say. And after the sacrifices were ended at Jerusalem, he was incontinently carried home again into Ethiopia in his own chariot, and was reading in the prophet Isaiah. It is an excellent pattern of godliness, that so great a potentate did, even while he was in his journey, earnestly read the holy scriptures, although ,he was but a layman, as they commonly call it, aq^ a politician. For the reading of the holy scriptures is even commended to those, as Deut. xvii. 18, 19 ; Josh. i. 8. 29. Said, &c. As if he should say. But the Holy Spirit did speak these words to Philjp within. Go near unto the chariot, and join thyself to its side. 30. Running thither, &c. As if he should say, Philip having cheerfully obeyed the Holy Spirit, toOk an opportunity to reveal the truth of the gospel unto him from the reading, whereunto he did see the potentate earnestly bent. 31. And he said. How can I, &c. He speaks not of any testi- mony of scripture, nor of things commanded and forbidden, which VEE. XXXII.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 207 are clear of themsel-ves, and that stand in need of no explication ; but concerning mystical prophecy, which, as long as it is not accomplished, or although the accomplishment be come, being unknown to any, is not well enough understood ; but if an inter- pretation be made upon the present accomplishment, by a man filled with the Spirit of God, the prophecy is very easy to be understood, even as this potentate did know, and perceive pre- sently the meaning of a very abstruse, and hard place, once only proposed to him by Philip. " Nobly," says AuguBtin,i " and profitably hath the Holy Spirit so modified the holy scriptures, that by very clear places he might satiate our hunger, by the more dark rub off our contempt or loathings ; there is almost nothing searched out of these obscurities, which may not be found plainly spoken elsewhere," Therefore in explaining the obscurer places of scripture, the more learned are to be consulted, who are much exercised in them ; but they are so to be consulted, that they may make plain and evident to those that consult them, that their exposition fe the genuine and true sense of the scripture, but not impose upon their consulters to yield to their interpretation before they have tried it. For here Philip did inquire of the potentate whether he did sufficiently understand what he did read ; we must therefore know, and understand those things which we are to believe. And he desired Philip, &c. Great was the modesty and hur manity of this potentate ; who not only suffered himself patiently to be inquired at by a stranger, and mean born man, as it did appear, but did confess his ignorance frankly and freely, did invite him most lovingly to come Up into his chariot to sit, and confer with him, and to expound unto him the scriptures that he did not understand. 32. The place. Greek Treptoxi?) from the Greek verb wipii\w, which signifies " I contain," or embrace, that is, a sentence com- prehended, or shut up in a full compass and measure of words, which they commonly call a section or period. As a sheep, &c. The meekness and patience of Christ, when he was to die to purge away the sins of men, is described by the similitude of a sheep and a lamb, taking patiently their shearing, and slaughter itself, when the most part of other creatures, while ' Doct. Christ, ii. 6. 208 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. VIII. they are led unto the slaughter, use to cry out, and wrestle against it. , So opened he not his mouth. As if he should say, So he who, John xviii. 6, overthrew a great band of men by one word, when he was taken and led away, was bound, beaten with whips, nailed to the cross, did not threateningly complain, or speak angry words. See 1 Pet. ii. 23. 33. In his humiliti/ {Greek, "in his humiliation") his judgment was taken away. That is, by a base and detestable wrong, or oppression of him, he was condemned, and delivered up unto death against all law. The Hebrew has, Isa. liii. 8, He was taken from straining and judgment. That is, after he was bound by the wicked sedition of the Jews, and condemned by the sacrilegious voice of Pilate, he was lifted up upon the cross. See John iii. 14, xii. 32, 34, the Seventy seem. to have read in the Hebrew text, "laDffia npb tisj?3, instead of n;?^ asiriKn?'! isi??? , JHis generation, &c. As if he should say, Who can express in words the wickedness of that generation wherein he lived, who did proceed to so great a wickedness and ungodliness, that unde- servedly they did condemn him to a cruel death ? " These words, and such like, are frequently among the Jews," says Light- foot.' " In the generation in which the son of David shall come, the synagogue shall be a brothel-house, Galilee shall be destroyed, and Gablan shall be wasted. The wisdom of the scribes shall be corrupted, good and merciful men shall fail, and truth Itself shall cease, and the face of that generation shall be as the face of dogs. K. Levi says : That the son of David shall not come, but in a generation in which there shall be impudent faces, and which, shall deserve destruction. R. Jannay says : When ye shall see generation after generation, railing and blaspheming, then look for the feet, that is, the coming of the King Messiah." Thus far famous Lightfoot. For his life shall be taken from the earth. Hebrew, Isa. liii. 8, Because he was cut off from the land of the living. That is. They slew him most undeservedly with an untimely and violent death. See Daniel ix. 26 ; Luke xxiii. 31. These words of the pro- phecy are put in the preterperfect tense, whereas they have the signification of the future. The Jews did understand excellently/ well from these things prophesied here by Isaiah, that the Messiah 1 Midrae Schir. fol. 1 73. VER. XXXm.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED, 209 should suffer pains, straits, reproaches, finally a violent death, and shameful punishment ; but when they did know for a certainty by the predictions of the prophets, that both the highest honours were prepared for him, and the greatest power, and a kingdom also, they do suppose they can marvellously well prevent the discrepancy of the prophecies, in which the two comings of Christ are predicted — ^the one humble artd base, the other noble and honourable — if so be they can devise two Messiahs: the one to come of that ancient Joseph, the son of Jacob by Rachel, which Messiah should be called Nehemias, the son of IJziel; that this should be unhappy, and appointed to miseries and a bloody death, in fighting against the wicked and monstrous Armillus : that the other should spring of the lineage of David, and be the restorer of the kingdom of Israel, and abound in gldry, and gather the dispersed in Israel, by whom the Messiah son of Joseph, is to be raised unto life again, after that God hath discomfited Armillus, and all Armillus's army, with fire and brimstone sent down from heaven. " This doctrine," says Huetius, eminent in every sort of learning, " is delivered in the sixth book of the second part of the Talmud, which is concerning the feast of tabernacles, ch. v. ; and the same. doctrine is found both in Bereschith Habba, and in E. David Kimchi, and Aben Ezra, and E. Makir in his Aromatic Powder, and in a great many later rabbins. In which it is mar- vellous to think how great an error hath deceived them. There is prophesied one Messiah's two comings ; they look for two Messiahs' one coming. Of the which fiction of theirs, if any shall inquire a reason from them, they will either give none or a foolish one. They allege these words of Isa. xxxii. 20, Blessed are ye that sow beside all waters, that send forth thither the feet of the ox and the ass. They expound that sowing to be money given to the poor, which who shall give, they say he is worthy of Elias, and both the Messiahs. They think Elias is noted by the word immittentes, " that send forth," because it is written in Mai. iv. 5, BeJiold I will send Elias the prophet. They expound the foot of the ox to be the Messiah that is to come of Joseph, because Moses beino- near to death spake of Joseph, Deut. xxxiii. 17, His beauty is like the firstling of his bullock : but they expound the ass to be the Messiah son of David, whom Zecharias did predict, ch. ix. 9, that he should be poor, and carried on a she- ass. It is tedious to me to rehearse those trifles, which notwithstanding are to be found P 210 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. TITI. in Bereschith Eabba ; but it is profitable to know the madness of this sect thoroughly. The later rabbins should have been ashamed to grow wise; therefore they follow the authority of their fathers. But even this very self-same testimony out of Bereschith Eabba reproveth their error, where they acknowledge, out of the Prophecy of Zecharias, that the Messiah son of David is to be poor. Therefore Aben Ezra acknowledges himself to be ignorant whether Zecharias doth point at the Messiah there or not: whereas Saadias Gaon will have Zecharias to prophesy there of that Messias, to whom Daniel, ch. vii. 14, promiseth power, riches, and an eternal kingdom. The other place of Moses, in which Joseph is compared unto a firstling bullock, and which they do attribute unto the Messiah son of Joseph, is applied unto the Messiah son of David, in the Midrash Thehillim. The Jews say that Jacob did prophesy these words concerning the Messiah son of David, Gen. xlix. 10 : " Till he come who is to be sent, and he shall be the expectation of the nations." And these words, Ps. Ixxil. 17 : And all the tribes of the earth shall be blessed in him ; all nations shall magnify him. But in the book of the Talmud, entitled Sanhedrim, the same testimonies are referred unto that Messiah, of whom Isaiah spake, ch. liii. 4, Surely he hath borne our griefs and carried our sorrows, R. Solomon Jarchi, in his Expositions upon the Gemara of Sanhedrim, and R. Moses Alschech say, that the fifty-third chapter of Isaiah belongs unto the Messiah son of David, in which are told the griefs, reproaches, death of the Messiah, the which opinion, B,a. Isaac Abrabanel retains in some places. This indeed doth teach that the Messiah son of David, is signified in those words, which are, Isa. xi. 3, 4 : He shall not judge after the sight of his eyes, neither reprove after the hearing of his ears, but with righteousness shall he judge the poor. But the same book of Sanhedrim teacheth that the Messiah, whom Isaiah foretelleth there, shall be punished by God. The Messiah that is sprung of Ruth, is the self-same that was the nephew of David ; notwithstanding we read in Ruth Rabbathi, that a kingdom and calamities are portended unto this Messiah in these words, which are in Ruth ii. 14 : Come hither, and eat of the bread, and dip thy morsel into the vinegar. Therefore some rabbins of no small note do agree that there is one only Messiah to come twice." 34. Answering. That is. Beginning to speak, or having begun. See our literal explication. Matt. xi. 25. VER. XXXVl.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 211 Of himself. These things in some manner in a typical sense may not badly be understood of Isaiah himself, who suffered many evils in Manasses's time. But they are understood of another in a full and perfect sense, to wit, of Christ, that suffered griefs, reproaches, and a bitter death, that he might give us eternal salvation. 35. And opening, &c. As if he should say. But Philip having begun' a long oration from this place of Isaiah, which was before his hands, he took an occasion to instruct the Eunuch about Jesus, in whom this and other predictions of the prophets are fulfilled in an excellent manner. He told him that that Jesus who was born of the family of David, born of a virgin at Bethlehem, and suffered a bitter death for our offences, was raised from the dead, to sit at the right hand of God the Father, whose only begotten Son he is, and that none is to obtain eternal salvation, but those who, earnestly repenting of their sinful condition, believe in Jesus himself, and obey his precepts. And that those that do profess his faith and repentance, ought to be dipped into the water accord- ing to Christ's appointment, that the remission of sins may be sealed unto them by this holy dipping, which remission -is freely granted to every repenting sinner, when he does believe in Christ. 36. And as they went on their way. That is, while they went forward in the Eunuch's journey to Gaza from Jerusalem. They came unto a certain water. Eusebius, in his book of Hebrew places, which Jerome did translate and augment, saith, "Bethsur is in the tribe of Judah, or Benjamin, and at this day is called Beth- soron, a village to us in the twentieth mile, as we travel from -^lia to Hebron, near which there is a fountain that springeth at the foot of the hill, and is sucked up by the same ground in which it ariseth. And the Acts of the Apostles do tell us that the Eunuch of Candace the queen was baptized in this fountain by Philip. And there is also another village called Bethsur, in the tribe of Judah, distant a thousand paces from Eleutheropolis." See, here is water, &c. It doth manifestly appear that the eunuch among other things was taught by Philip, that baptism in water was of necessity to be taken by them, who, repenting of their sinful life, do embrace the faith of Christ, as a holy rite appointed and commanded by Christ himself, that it might be in itself a figure of new life, and a seal of the remission of sins obtained through Christ. p 2 212 THli ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VIII. 37. If thou believest. That the eunuch is not permitted to be baptized, unless he had professed a sincere faith in Christ, it doth sufficiently enough declare how truly great Basil hath spoken in his book on the Holy Spirit, ch. xii. " Faith and baptism are the two means of salvation, inseparably cleaving together ; for faith is perfected by baptism, but baptism is founded by faith, and by the same names both things are fulfilled. For as we believe in the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit : so also we, are baptized in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; and indeed there goeth before a confession leading us "unto salvation: but baptism fol' loweth, sealing our confession and covenant." But the covenant of God is his promise of giving us eternal life, and our answer is our promise of worshipping God according to his will revealed to us. The same church's teacher, in his third book against Euno- mius : " Baptism is the seal of faith ; faith is the confession of the God-head ; it is necessary we should first believe, then be sealed with baptism." According to this rule of scripture, and agreeing with reason itself, the most part of the Greeks in all ages, even unto this day, retain a custom of delaying infant baptism, till they themselves can give a confession of their faith, as Grotius hath noted on Matt. xix. 13. But especially the sixth canon of the synod of Neocsesarea is to be observed, whose words are as follows: " Concerning a woman with child, that she may be baptized when she pleases; for her baptism concerns not her child. For everyone is to give a demonstration of his own choice in a confession." For however the interpreters draw it to another purpose, it does appear that the question was made of women big with child, because it did seem that the child was baptized together with the mother, which, notwithstanding, ought not, nor used not to be baptized, except of its own proper election and profession. And to this purpose are the words of Balsamo : ^ " The unborn babe cannot be baptized, because it is not come to light, neither can it have a choice in making con- fession, which is required in holy baptism." And Zonaras, " The babe will then need baptism, when it can choose." But the synod doth determine that baptism of a woman great with child, doth therefore rightly proceed, because her baptism concerns her alone, who can confess what she believeth, and not the child in her womb. But that synod of NeocEesarea was held before the first Nicene synod; for we read the name of Basil, Bishop of Amasia, subscribed ' In Compen. can. tit. 4, VEE, XXXVII. J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 213 to the Neocaesarean synod, who suffered martyrdom under Llci- nius, as Eusebius writes in his Chronicle. Gregory Nazianzen, in his fortieth oration, which is upon holy baptism, treating of those who die without baptism, gives us an instance in those to whom baptism was not administered, by reason of infancy. And the self- same Nazianzen, though he was a bishop's son, being a long time bred up under his father's care, was not baptized, till he came to man's age, as he doth teach us in his life. In like manner Basil the Great, that was born of very devout parents, and instructed unto godliness from his childhood, was not baptized until he was a man, if any credit be to be given to his life, that goes about under the name of Amphilochius. John of Antioch, called afterward Chrysostom, was born of Christian parents, as the truer opinion is, tutored by the famous Bishop Meletius, was yet not baptized till he was one and twenty years of age. Hierom also, Ambrose, and Austin, who were born of Christian parents, and consecrated to Christian discipline, even from their childhood, were not baptized before they were thirty years of age. Hence it doth manifestly appear, " That the wisest of our fathers in Christ did not come unto baptism until they were come to a strong and confirmed wit and age;" as Jeremy Taylor, Bishop of Down, observeth in the 12th sect, of the Life of Christ, in the sermon on Kepentance, n. 20. TertuUian, in his book of baptism, ch. xviii. gives advice to infants to come unto Christ to be instructed, not to be baptized before they have understood the force of baptism. " Therefore," says he, " for the condition, and disposition, also age of every person, the delaying of baptism is more profitable : yet chiefly about little ones. What need is there of sureties to be brought in danger, who even themselves may break their promises through mortality, and be deceived by the increase of an evil disposition ? Indeed the Lord saith, Do not ye hinder them to come unto me. Let them come, therefore, while they grow to years, let them come while they learn, and while they come let them be taught. Let them become Christians, when they are enabled to know Christ. Why doth innocent age hasten to the remission of sins ? Men will deal more warily in worldly affairs, so that they who are not trusted with an earthly inheritance, are trusted with a heavenly : let them know to ask for salvation, that thou mayest appear to have given it to him that desireth." Ludovicus Vives 214 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. VIII. affirms,' "None, except grown to man or woman's estate, were wont to be baptized." The famous Bishop of Meaux, J. B. Bossuet, in his French treatise of the Holy Supper under both kinds, p. 127 : "As touching infants, the pretended reformed (so the papists in France do call the protestants who follow Calvin's opinions) say that their baptism is grounded on the authority of the scripture ; but they bring ua no place out of it, expressly affirming it, and what consequences they draw out of the same, they are very far fetched, not to say very doubtful, and too deceitful." One nameless person, a very learned man, answering to the treatise of this learned bishop, saith, p. 92: "As for the custom of baptizing infants, I Confess we nowhere read anything expressly and particularly writ- ten in the gospel, from whence the necessity of psedobaptism can be shown: and that those places of the gospel, by which it uses to be proved, at the most do prove that that custom of baptizing of infants is lawful and permitted, or rather not impermitted or un- lawful. If all the anabaptists rested in that opinion, neither condemned that custom of wickedness and sacrilege, reason would be on their side, neither would they say anything which should not be founded on the common principles of all protestants. The primitive churches did not baptize infants; the learned Grotius hath made plain and proved that, in his notes on the gospel. That doth most plainly appear by the very rite of baptizing used in the Roman church. For baptism is to be asked before the person to be baptized enter into the churchy which the surety does in the infant's name ; a clear and distinct confession of faith is required, which the same surety rehearseth in the infant's name ; a renounc- ing of the world, its pomps, the flesh and the devil, is to be promised, which the surety, or as they call it, the godfather promiseth for the infant ; is not this a clear argument, that of oldi, the persons who were to be baptized; asked for themselves, baptism in their own name, of their own choice, and profess their faith, and were wont to renounce their former life, to consecrate the remainder of their life in this present mortal flesh to Jesus Christ ?" Curcellseus says, in his dissertation of original sin, num. 56, " that the custom of baptizing infants, was brought in without the commandment of Christ, and did not begin before the third age after Christ was born ; in the two former ages no sign of it ' In Aug. Civ. i. 27. VEE. XXX VII, J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 215 doth appear." This custom being brought in, was much more frequent in Africa than in Asia and other parts of the world, and with a certain greater opinion of necessity, unto which they did fall, who did expound of baptism, that of Christ, John iii, 5 : Except a man be bom of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God, &c., as if it did also include infants ; wjiereas, notwithstanding, our Lord Jesus speaketh unto those only that were come to age, in the person of Nicodemus, and doth declare how greatly they stand in need to be born again of the Spirit and of water: that is, of the Spirit purifying their hearts. Christ, indeed, by this metaphor, alludeth unto the baptism of water that was sometime to be commanded by him, but did think only of the baptism of persons grown to years of understanding, seeing he commanded. Matt, xxviii. 19, that those that were to be baptized, dbould first be instructed in the faith. " For it cannot be that the body receive the sacrament of baptism, except the soul receive the verity of faith beforehand," as Jerome hath observed on that place of Matthew. See what we have noted above, upon ch. ii. 41. With all thy heart. That is. With an earnest desire of thy heart, and an unfeigned faith. " The scripture," says Calvin, " oftentimes taketh the whole heart, for the sincere, and unfeigned heart, unto which is opposed a double heart. So there is no need that we should imagine them to believe perfectly, who believe with their whole heart, when there may be a weak and small faith in him, who notwithstanding shall have an upright heart, and free from dissimulation. So it is fit to take that which David glorieth of, that he doth love the Lord with all his heart. Philip truly did first baptize the Samaritans, whom as yet he knew to be far distant from the mark. The faith, therefore, of the whole heart, is that, which having lively roots in the heart, nevertheless endear- voureth to grow daily." Thou mayest. Hence we may gather how absurd their opinion is, who think that by baptism, faith is produced in infants new born, and destitute of the use of all reason. For if baptism cannot do it in those that are come to years, it can much less do it in infants. Neither can it be said, except very absurdly, that they do believe in Christ, or in his gospel, when there does not indeed appear even the least shadow of faith in them. They do not know their parents by any token, and know not what dif- ference there is betwixt their right and left hand, how then are 216 THE ACTS OF THE HOT.Y APOSTLES [cHAV. VIII. ' they able to understand the least things of the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, which are the objects of our faith ? They do not consent unto any human thing; can they then assent unto divine things ? They do frame no resolution in their mind as yet, can they then frame that resolution of leading their lives according to the gospel ? Neither is their opinion much sounder, who do not ascribe any act of faith to infants, but yet nevertheless attribute some seeds of faith. For what is that seed ? In the seed lieth the whole strength and substance of the thing that is to arise from thence. Is there any such like thing in infants ? Does this virtue show itself of its own accord in them when they grow ? No, truly, unless they be instructed in the doctrine of the gospel. But they say, Without faith it is impossible to please God, Heb. xi. 6, therefore we must judge either that infants have faith, or that they are damned eternally if they die in their infancy. Famous Curcellseus says,'^ " It is a foolish consequence, as if truly it did not appear, that this, as all the rest of the precepts of the gospel, belongs to those that are grown two years only, and are, capable of instructions, either of virtue or of vice, and that it doth oblige them alone. Truly faith is not more necessary unto salvation, than the observation of the rest of the precepts of the gospel, and to live after the Spirit, not after the flesh. Since then infants can be Baved without these, why not also without faith ?" The holy scriptures do show, 2 Sam. xii. 18, that David's little son, begotten of Bathsheba by adultery, died the seventh day after his birth. David did not mourn for him being dead without circumcision, who mourned for him before he died. Ambrose says in his funeral sermon on the death of Valentinian, " He did weep that he might not be taken from him : but left off to weep after he was taken away, whom he knew to be with Christ. And that ye may know that to be true which I assert, he did weep for Amnon his incestuous son, that was murdered, he mourned for Absalom the parricide, when he was slain : he did npt think it needful to mourn for his innocent son, because he knew that they died for their wickedness, but did believe that this should live for his innocency." This proof of St. Ambrose doth show that that was no special privilege revealed to David concerning that infant; but that David did take that ground of consolation from the com- mon law, which doth comprehend all the infants, at least of believers, dying in their infancy. ' Institut. vii. 8. VER. XXXVIII.] LITERALtY EXPLAINED. 217 / believe that Jesus Christ is t/ie Son of God. As if he should have said, I unfeignedly believe from my soul and heart that Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of the eternal God, the Redeemer, and Doctor of the world, promised in the law and prophets, who reconciled the Eternal Father to us by the sacrifice of his death, and swallowed up by the shining of his gospel these sparks which did glister in the Old Testament, that whoever should hear him, and should lead his life up unto the rule delivered by him, should obtain eternal salvation by his intercession and merits. Hence it IS manifest, that to be baptized in the name, or unto the name of Jesus Christ, is no other thing than to be baptized upon profession of faith in Christ, without hypocrisy, and upon promise that he doth embrace the doctrine revealed by him in the scriptures, with an earnest desire of heart, and will reform and correct his manners according to it. 38. And he commanded the chariot to stand still. That is, And he commanded the chariot driver to stop the chariot. And they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch. Both he that was to baptize, and he that was to be baptized went down into the water, because he ought not only to sprinkle him with water, but to dip him into the water, Christ commanding ^airriafiov, dipping, but not pavTKXfiov, sprinkling. The Roman order, published with the writers concerning ecclesiastical ceremo- nies, saith; " The presbyters enter into the fountain within unto the water, and the males are first baptized, and then the females." Luther in his Latin tom. i., printed at Wittenburg, fol. 71, con- cerning the sacrament of baptism : " The name 'baptism' is a Greek word, it may be turned a dipping, when we dip something in water, that it may be wholly covered with water ; and although that custom be now altogether abolished among the most part, for neither do they dip the whole children, but only sprinkle them with a little water, they ought altogether nevertheless to be dipped, and presently to be drawn out again. For the etymology of the word seems to require that. And the Germans also call baptism tauff, from deepness, which they call tieff in their tongue, as if it were meet that those be dipped deeply, who are baptized. And truly if ye consider what baptism doth signify, ye shall see the same thing to be required; for it signifieth this, that the old man and our nativity, that is full of sins, which is wholly of flesh and blood, may be overwhelmed by the divine grace : there- 218 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VIH. fore the manner of baptism ought to answer to the signification of baptism, that it may show a sure and plain sign of it." The same, torn. ii. in Latin, concerning Babylon's Captivity, fol. 79. " The other thing," saith he, " which belongs to baptism, is the sign or the sacrament, which is the dipping itself into the water, from whence also it hath its name ; for, to baptize, in Greek, is to dip, and baptism is dipping. For it has been said, that signs are appointed according to the divine promises, which resembled that thing which the words do signify, or as the later writers say, ' the sacrament effectually signifieth.' " And a little afterwards : " That the minister dippeth a child into the water, signifieth death. That he again bringeth him out of it signifieth life. So Paul expounds, E.om. vi." And a few words afterwards : " That there- fore washing from sins is attributed to baptism, it is truly indeed attributed, but the signification is softer and slower than that it can express baptism, which is rather a sign both of death and resurrection. Being moved by this reason, I would have those that are to be baptized, to be altogether dipped into the water, as the word doth sound, and the mystery doth agnify." John Bugenhagius Pomeranus, both a fellow and successor in the ministry of Luther at Wittenburg, whom Thuanus and Zanchius witness to have been a moderate, very godly, and very learned man, doth afiirm about the end of his book, published in the German tongue, in the year 1542. " That he was desired to be a witness of a baptism at Hamburgh, in the year 1529 ; that when he had seen the minister only sprinkle the infant wrapped in swathing clothes, on the top of the head, he was amazed; because he neither heard nor saw any such thing, nor yet read in any history, except in the case of necessity, in bed-rid persons* In a general assembly, therefore, of all the ministers of the word that was convened, he did ask of a certain minister, John Fritz by name, who was sometimes minister of Lubeck, how the sacra- ment of baptism was administered at Lubeck ? who for his piety and candour did answer gravely, that the infants were baptized naked at Lubeck after the same fashion altogether as in Ger- many. But from whence and how that peculiar manner of bap- tizing hath crept into Hamburg, he was ignorant." At length they did agree among themselves that the judgment of Luther, and of the divines of Wittenburg, should be demanded about this point : which thing being done, Luther did write back to Ham- VER. XXXVIII.] LITEEAI.LY EXPLAINED. , 219 burg, "that this sprinkling was an abuse which they ought to remove." Thus plunging was restored at Hamburg. Common fonts, big and large enough, were in ancient times fitted and accommodated to dipping, in the which fonts, by conduits, or certain inferior passages, the water overflowing upon the baptized, did run away, as is manifest even by this memorable history of Socrates, which we do here bring in.' A certain deceiver, a Jew by nation, counterfeiting himself to be a Christian, was oftentimes baptized, and by this sort of cheat had scraped together much money. When he had deceived many Christian sects by this craft, for he had been baptized both by the Arians and Macedonians, having none more whom he could deceive, at length he came to Paul bishop of the Novatians, and affirming that he had an earnest desire to be baptized, he pirayed the bishop that he would be pleased to baptize him himself. He indeed praised the Jew's will and desire, but did deny that he could give him baptism, before he had been instructed in the principles of faith, and besides all this, had fasted many days. But the Jew, who contrary to his wish or expectation was compelled to fast, did 80 much the more urge that he might be baptized. The bishop therefore not willing to offend him with a longer delay, when he pressed, and urged him to it, prepares the things that are necessary to baptism. And when he had brought a white garment to the Jew, and commanded the belly of the font to be filled with water, he brought the Jew thither, as if he were going to baptize him. But a certain secret virtue and power of God made the water suddenly to vanish. But when the bishop, and those who were present, suspecting nothing of what then was done, they did think that the water ran out by some secret passage underneath, where it was wont to be let out, they fill the belly of it again, after they had carefully stopped all the passages. And when the Jew was brought again to the font, the water did again altogether vanish. Then Paul said. Either, O Man, thou deceivest, or hast unknowingly received the sacrament of baptism before. When therefore a great many men flocked together to see this miracle, one that knew the Jew, found him to be the self-same man that was baptized before by bishop Atticus." Hereto belongs also what the Magdeburg Centuriators do relate of Eathold.^ " In the year of the Lord, say they, 718, Eathold, general of the Frisians, was brought unto this 1 Hist. Eccl. vii. 17. ' Cent. viii. 6. 220 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. VIIT. by the preaching of bishop Wulfran, that he was to be baptized. When he had entered into the font with one foot, drawing back the other foot, he asked where the most part of his ancestors were ? whether in hell, or in paradise ? And hearing that more were in hell, drawing back his foot that was in the water: 'It is better,' says he, ' that I follow the greater part then the fewer.' And being so deceived by the devil, promising that he would give him three days hence matchless gifts, the self-same third day he perished with a sudden and eternal death. Sigebertus. Henry of Erford does relate the same out of the Acts and Monuments of Wulfran, chap, xxvi. Burgomensis says that it was in the year 729." Hither also pertaineth the history of Constantine, who from hence got the sir- name of Copronymus, because when he was baptized in his infancy, be defiled the waters of the holy font with his excrements, in the year of Christ 720. "We have a like example in the emperor Wenceslaus, the son of Charles the Fourth, who was born at Norinburg the 28th of September, in the year 1361 : for he also is reported to have defiled the water with his dung, when he was baptized. Moreover it is reported that while the water that was to be applied to the baptism of Wenceslaus was warming, the pastor's house by Saint Sebald was set on fire, and burned out. Which things certainly could not happen, if both the Copronymus's, the one in the west, and the other in the east, had been sprinkled, and poured with a little water, being wrapped up in their swaddling bands and clouts. About the end of the eleven hundredth- year after the birth of Christ, Odo, or Otho, bishop of Bamberg, who first preached the gospel to the inhabitants of Pomerania, as Suffridus his assisting presbyter doth witness ; ' " When there were three fonts built, he did so order, that he himself should baptize the male children alone in one of the fonts, and the rest of the priests, the women apart, and the men apart. What manner of fonts these were, and after what fashion all were baptized, is declared there after this manner : ' The good father caused the administration of the sacrament to be done with so much diligence, also with so great neatness and honesty, that nothing indecent, nothing to be ashamed of, nothing ever might be done there, which might not please any of the gentiles. For he commanded very big hogsheads to be digged a little deep into the earth, so that the mouths of the hogsheads did stand above ground unto the heighth of a man's ' A pud Aiidrcam S. Michaelis Abbatem in Othonis Actis, lib. ii. cap. IS. VEK. XXXVIII.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 221 knee, or less, which being filled with water, it was easy to descend into them. And he caused curtains to be hanged about the hogs- heads upon small pillars set up, and cords put into them, that each hogshead might be enclosed all about with a veil in manner of a circle: but a linen cloth did hang upon a cord put through it, before the priests, and his fellow ministers, who stood on the one hand, to administer the sacrament, that so all things being very modest on every side, there might not be any thing censured as folly or filthiness in the sacrament, lest the honester sort of persons should withdraw themselves from the sacrament of baptism for shame' sake." The author proceeds, and declareth the thing yet more clearly in this manner. " When therefore all did come to be catechized, the bishop speaking unto them all, commonly with a speech that did agree to such, and setting one sex over against another, on the right hand, and on the left, anointed the catechized with oil : afterward biddeth them go from the font. Therefore they coming unto the entrance of the curtain, they one by one only did enter in with their godfathers, and presently the godfathers did receive the garment, with which the person to be baptized was clothed, and the taper, when he went down into the water, and they holding it before their face, until they did restore it again to him, when he came out of the water. But the priest, who did stand at the hogshead, when he had rather heard, than seen, that there was somebody in the water; having removed the vail a little, with thrice dipping of his head, did perfect what belonged to the sacrament of baptism, and when he had anointed him with liquor of chrism on the crown of the head, and a white garment being put on him, and when he had drawn back the veil, he com- manded the person that was baptized, to come out of the water, his godfathers covering, and putting on him the garment which they did hold. Neither did the diligence of Otho in the winter time, neglect to find out what was most convenient for the season, to wit, he celebrated the sacrament of baptism in warm baths and in hot water with the same neatness and observation of modesty, with the hogsheads set into the earth, and curtains applied, frankin- cense, and other odoriferous spices sprinkling all things." This most accurate diligence of Saint Otho proveth, that the prudence of those men was contrary unto all good order, who after a thou- sand and three hundred years after Christ, did change baptism, that is, dipping, appointed by Christ, into rhantism, that is, sprink- 222 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. VIII. ling, brought into its place with great boldaess, lest those that were to be baptized ia cold countries and seasons, if they should be plunged according unto Christ's commandment, might fall into diseases, or be chilly with cold ; for the heating of the water might be a sufficient remedy against this evil, or danger, as the above quoted excellent divine, and reformer, John Bugenhagius in his aforementioned German book, doth urge more at large. "An- ciently, (when rhantism was not yet substituted for baptism,)" says the English Chrysostom of this age, " Those who were baptized, put off their garments, which signified the putting off .of the body of sin ; and were immersed, and buried in the water, to represent the death of sin ; and then did rise up again out of the water, to signify their entrance upon a new life ; and to these customs the apostle alludes, Kom. vi. &c." Thus the very reverend John Tillotson, D.D. dean of Canterbury, a man of great liberality toward the poor (which I myself profess with a grateful mind, that I have oftentimes had experience of it,) commended by all good men for the excellency of his wit, the uprightness of his mindj the purity of his manners and doctrine, in a grave and famous sermon on 2 Tim. ii. 19. "Christians," says another doctor in divinity, who excels in every sort of learning, and zeal of true piety, " being plunged into the water in baptism, signifieth their undertaking, and obliging themselves in a spiritual sense to die, and be buried with Jesus Christ (which death and burial consists in an utter renouncing and forsaking of all their sins,) that so, answerably to his resurrection, they may live a holy and godly life." So that reverend minister of the gospel, Edward Fowler, canon of Gloucester, in his admirable book concerning the scope of the Chris- tian religion, doth interpret the force of the words of the apostle, B,om. vi. 4. Deservedly therefore that most learned Anonymus protestant of France, who answereth to that tractate concerning the communion under two kinds of my lord James Benigne Bossuet, the famous bishop of Meaux, saith, pp. 24, 25, "It is most certain that baptism hath not been administered hitherto, otherwise than by sprinkling by the most part of protestants, but truly this sprinkling is an abuse. This custom, which without an accurate examination, they have retained from the Eomish church, in like manner as many other things, makes their baptism very defective. It corrupteth its -institution, and ancient use, and that nearness of similitude, which is needful should be betwixt it and VEU. XXXVIII.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 223 faith, repentance, and regeneration. This reflection of M. Bossuet, deserveth to be seriously considered, to wit, that this use of plung- ing hath continued for the space of a whole thousand and three hundred years, that hence we may understand that we did not carefully, as it was meet, examine things which we have retained from the Roman church; and therefore since the most learned bishops of that church do teach us now that the custom established by most grave arguments, and so many ages, was first abolished by her, this self-same thing was very unjustly done by her, and that the consideration of our duty doth require at our hands, that we seek again the primitive custom of the church, and the institution of Christ." The same person there a little afterward : " Though therefore we should yield to M. Bossuet, that we are convinced by the force of his arguments, that the nature and substance of bap- tism consisteth in dipping, what may he hope for from us, but that we profess ourselves obliged to him by no small favour, and thank him that he hath delivered us from error, when we greatly erred in this thing? And as we are resolved indeed, to correct and rectify this error, so we desire earnestly with humble prayer and supplication of him, that he would correct and mend that error of taking away the cup from the laics coming unto the holy supper. Does Monsieur Bossuet think that the protestants will have a greater respect of that custom which they have found not to be lawful, and that by the most weighty, and solid arguments, than of the institution of Jesus Christ, and that to let Borne get an opportunity of boldly and freely breaking the laws of Christ by the pernicious imitation of our example ? Far be that wicked frame of mind from them ; they are straiter bound by the authority of their holy master,- than to despise his voice, when his sound Cometh to their ears : My sheep follow my voice ; and again, I do know my sheep. None, except wolves lurking under a sheep-skin, refuseth, and turneth from it." So far our most learned Anonymus, which is most agreeable to his admonition unto the papists barring the laymen from the holy cup, in the preface of his forecited answer to the treatise of the bishop of Meaux concerning the communion under both kinds. "There is no place therefore for cogging in these things, for those that pretend the specious title of received custom for the day's practice, when Jesus Christ and his gospel is not the custom, but the truth. From the beginning it was so, says the same Jesus unto them, who did object unto him 224 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. VIII. the worst and cursed cnstom of their ancestors. When we shall be presented before the judgment of Christ, he will not judge his disciples by custom, but by the lively and effectual word of his gospel. Neither should any be taken with a vain hope of framing an excuse from the authority of the church, because all the authority of the church is from Christ, granted unto her for that intent and purpose, that she might procure a religious obedience to his laws, and heavenly precepts, but not that she might break, repeal, and cancel them." Thus far the Anonymus our country- man, whose sound reasoning hath made the booksellers generally suppose him to be Monsieur de la B,oq-ue, the most famous pastor of the reformed church which is at E.ouen, whom his writings do show to be inferior to none in godliness and learning. Heidegger in his Historico-Theological Anatomy of the council of Trent, p. 2, upon the canons of twenty-first session, saith, " There is in the church no more power of changing the rites of the sacraments appointed by Christ, than there is power of changing his word and law. For as this his word contains a sign audible, so those rites do contain a visible sign of his divine will." Let us shut up all therefore with that most holy martyr Cyprian, in his sixty and- third epistle to Csecilius : " Yerily it becometh us to obey and to do what Christ hath done and commanded to be done, when he himself saith in the gospel : If ye do whatsoever I command you, henceforth I will not call you servants, but friends. And that Christ alone ought to be heard, the Father also beareth witness from heaven, saying : This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased, hear ye him. Wherefore, if Christ alone be to be heard, we ought not to give ear to what another before us did think meet to be done, but what Christ did first do, who is before all: for neither ought we to follow the custom of men, but the truth of God, seeing God speaketh and saith by Isaiah the prophet: Without cause they do worship me, teaching the commands and doc- trines of men. And again our Lord in the gospel repeateth the self-same thing, saying: Ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may establish your own tradition. Julius, the first Roman bishop of this name, in his epistle to the bishops through Egypt, - and Paschal the Second, in his epistle to Pontius, abbot of Cluny, do check those who did give unto the people dipped bread for the perfecting of the communion, seeing that in the first celebration, and institution of the eucharist, Christ did give bread and wine VEE. XXXIX.] LITEUA-LLY EXPLAINED. 225 apart unto the apostles, and Paschal doth absolutely command that they should not depart from that custom in any thing, by a human and new institution, the which custom Christ did keep and com- mend. "We may see the words of Julius in Gratian. ' God grant that in like manner all that are called Christians, and either ignorantly, or simply by a human and new institution, have changed baptism (or retained the change of baptism), dipping, that is, appointed by Christ, into rhantism, that is, sprinkling, against the apostolical and evangelical discipline observed by our ancestors, by the space of a thousand and three hundred years in all places, now having seen the light of the verity clearly, may return unto the root and original of our Lord's tradition, neither may there be any other thing done by them henceforth, than what our Lord did first for us, and did command to be done by us in his gospel. See what we have noted above, chap. ii. 28. And he iaptized him. To wit, Philip immersed the eunuch into the water, according to Christ's command. 39. And when they were come up out of the water. As if he should say. But as soon as the eunuch had received of Philip baptism, or the sacred dipping. The Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip. Some copies have in this place, " The Holy Spirit came upon the eunuch, but the angel of the Lord caught away Philip." As also Jerome hath cited in his Dialogue of the Orthodox, and Luciferian, and Grotius hath noted after Erasmus, and Beza. If we do follow that, it will be needful to acknowledge that without any laying on of hands, the eunuch did receive that extraordinary gift of the Holy Spirit which Cornelius, with his household, received also before baptism ; below, ch. X. 44, 47. Men did believe of Elias's disappearing of old, that he was caught away by the Holy Spirit, and transported to some other place, 1 Kings xviii. 12; 2 Kings ii. 16. But if this be understood of an angel, the same happened to Philip, as the writer of the last addition unto Daniel, ch. xiv. 35, 38, believed to have happened to Habakkuk the prophet. But Philip was carried by the Spirit, or by an angel of the Lord, not out of the body, but in the body, as Paul speaks, 2 Cor. xii. 2. The eunuch seeing it, that he might be confirmed in the faith in Jesus Christ, by that miracle that was added unto the doctrine. And the eunuch saw him no more The Christian religion is said * De Conse''. Hist. lib. H. cap. cum omne. Q 226 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. VIII. to have been sown in Ethiopia by this eunuch, when he returned thither, which religion is in some measure now retained by the Abyssines, though mingled with errors and Jewish ceremonies. See what I have observed above, upon ver. 27, and what I have spoken concerning Ethiopia, upon Amos ix. 7. But he went. Greek, yop, " for." A reason is given why the eunuch did see Philip no more, to wit, because he travelled in the journey he had entered upon unto Ethiopia, rejoicing in the knowledge of the -gospel, which he had attained unto by Philip's means, who was offered to him by a special providence of God ; but now Philip was carried to another place, where there was need of his ministry. 40. Was found. That is, did appear, and was seen. Esth. viii. 5, Who were found; that is, were present. Exod. xxxv. 23, With whom were found; that is, were, or did appear. Mai. ii. 6, Arid iniquity was not found in his lips ; 1 Pet. ii. 22, Neither was ffuile found in his mouth; that is, it was not. We have the verb find, for to see, Gen. iv. 13, .14, and elsewhere, in many places. "And, therefore," says Grotius, "NSn is translated by iSeTv, to see." Jer. xxiii. 11; Lam. ii. 9; Matt. i. 18, She was found with child, that is, she appeared great with child. At Azotus. Greek, iig, with the accusative, for iv, with the ablative, as above, ver. 23. Azotus, Heb. li'niliN, was first subdued by Joshua, Josh. xi. 15, afterward it was one of the cities of the five provinces of the Philistines, famous for the teuiple'of Dagon, whereof . there is mention made, 1 Sam. v. 4, and by the death of, Judas Maccaba3us, who died about it, witness Josephus, Antiq. xii. 19, where it is falsely read 'A?a for 'A^torou, as appears from 1 Mac. ix. 15 ; afterward Jonathan, the brother of Judas Macoabaeus, took it, and burnt it with the temple of Dagon, 1 Mac. x. 84; Josephus, Antiq. xiii. 8. Tartan, general to Sargon, king of the Assyrians, took it of old, whom the Hebrews do expound to be Sennacherib, Isa. xx. 1. It wasa very strong, fortified city, for it sustained the siege of Psammetichus, king of Egypt, by the space of twenty-nine years, by whom, at length, it was taken^ as Herodotus writes, book ii., where he calls it a great city of Syria, because under Syria was comprehended Palestina, Judsea, Phoenicia, and Idumsea. It was famous, also, by the Arabian merchandise, whose market town it was, as Mela doth report ; ' ' Lil'. i. ca]!. 10. ^^!:R. i.] literally explained. 227 also Ptolemy, in his fifth book of Geography, ch. 16, aad Pliny, Hist. Nat. V. ch. 14, have made mention of it. The women of this city are called, Neh. xiii. 23, npii^iB'N, Azotides, whom the Jews took for wives, and their sons did speak the language of Ashdod, as is manifest out of the same chapter, ver. 24. Azotus is reported to be distant from Gaza, (concerning which, above, ver. 26,) forty miles. And passing through, &c. As if he should say. Having gone from Azotus to Caesarea of Palestina, he did preach the gospel in all towns through which he went, even unto the end of his under- taken journey. This Csesarea was at first called the Tower of Strato, it was. magnificently repaired by Herod the Great, adorned with porches and temples; it was called by the same Herod, Caesarea, in honour of Augustus Caesar, as Josepbus wit- nesses, Antiq. xv. 13. It was perfected the tenth year after it was begun, as the same Josephus tells us, Antiq. xvi. 9. Eusebius Pamphilius owed his birth to this city, and was afterward bishop of the same. In like manner Acacius, (who lived in the time of the eophister Libanius,) whose life we have in Eunapius Sardinius, and Procopius the rhetorician and historian, secretary of Belisarius captain of Justinian the emperor, and fellow companion of all his wars, of which he wrote the history. There was also another Cajsarea, different from this, toward Paneas, which, in Matt. xvi. 13, and Josephus, Antiq. xx. 8, is called Csesarea Philippi, it is called by Ptolemy, in his fifth book, ch. 15, Caesarea Panias, which King Agrippa the younger, when he did enlarge its terri- tories, he changed its name, and in honour of Nero, called it Neronias, as Josephus doth write in the place even now cited. See our literal explication. Matt. xvi. 13. CHAPTER IX. 1. But Saul. Like a bloody wolf. See what is spoken above, ch. viii. 13. Breathing out threatenings and slaughter against tlie disciples. A Greek phrase. That is. From the bottom of his heart breathing out cruelty against the disciples of Christ.- So Cicero said, " Cati- line, raging with boldness, breathing out wickedness, wickedly con- triving the ruin of his country." Q 2 228 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. IX. Went unto the high priest. That is, to the prince of the highest banhedrim, who perhaps, as yet, was the same Annas, of whom above, eh. iv. 6. 2. And desired of Mm. As also of other senators of that great Sanhedrim, as may be seen below, ver. 14, and ch. xxii. 5 ; xxvi. 12. Letters. That is, letters from the senate. To Damascus, pi?^^, or, as it is read, 1 Chron. xviii. 5, pippi?? Damascus, or, Darmascus, a most famous city of old, the head and royal seat of Syria, surnamed Damascena, as the most eloquent of the prophets, Isaiah vii. 8, witnesseth. It was situated below Mount Hermon, from whence flowed two rivers, Amana or Abana, and Parpar or Parphar, which Stephanus Byzantius calls Bardinis ; the rest of the Greeks seem to call it Chrysorrhoas. Amana ran through the midst of the city, but Parpar did glide without the city, as Benjamin Tudelensis witnesseth in his Itinerary. There is also mention made of these two rivers, 2 Kings v. 12. See our literal explanation upon Amos i. 5. The builder of Damascus lieth in the grave of antiquity, notwithstanding that Josephus said,^ that Uz, the son of Aram, and grandson of Shem built it. Jerome also, in his questions upon Genesis, where he enumerates the posterity of Shem, speaks as if he were of the same opinion. But a little after, speaking of Eliezer of Damascus, Abraham's servant, he saith there : " They say, that by this man, Damascus was both built and named." The same in the beginning of his seventh book upon Isaiah : " We read first the name of Damascus in Genesis, who before Isaac was born in Abraham's house, and was esteemed his heir,' if Sarah had not had a son by the promise. It is expounded either a kiss of blood, or a drinker of blood, or the blood of hair cloth." " But if," saith the same authol-, upon Ezek. xxvii., " Damascus be interpreted a drinker of blood, and that tradition of the Hebrews be true, that the field in which the parricide Cain slew his brother Abel, was in Damascus, whence the place was marked with this name ; then Paul with just cause went to Damascus after the slaughter of Stephen, the first martyr for Christ, that he might bring the believers in Christ bound to Jerusalem ;" that, to wit, he in the same place might imitate the deeds of Cain towards Abel's followers. Damascus bred a good many famous men, among which, Nicolaus Damaseenus, a Peripa- ' Ant. lib. i. cap, 7, toward the end. VJiR. II.J UTISIULLY EXPLAINED. 229 tetic philosopher is the chief, who among other things did write a universal history of eighty books according to Suidas, a hundred and twenty-four according to Josephus, a hundred and forty-four according to Athenseus,' of which a few fragments are remaining. He was very familiar with Herod the Great, also very much beloved of Augustus Caesar, so that after him he called either dates nicolai, as it is in Athenseus ; Plutarch, sympodacdn ; Pliny, Isiodore in his Glosses, adhelmus ; or a kind of cake, according to Serenus Sammonicus, Hesychius, Milesius, Photius, and Suidas.- Joannes Damascenus, was of this city, who of a Jew became a Christian, in the year of our Lord 461 ; and another John, surnamed Manzur, whom Suidas extols to the skies, the Greeks being very prodigal in their own praise. " Although indeed," saith Vossius,'' " Dama- scenus was a most learned man, and of great fame, yet in many things he was over credulous. His histories, related in his sermons, show this. Baronius doth truly acknowledge that his writings are of very uncertain credit, and that he abodtnds with many fictions; which opinion of his Casuabon confirms,* where he remarked many gross errors. In others of his writings he does not appear judicious; as, for example's sake, when he tells us of Falconilltes' soul, that she, by the prayers of St. Thecla, the first martyr, was delivered from the punishments of hell, although she died in the heathen's errors and idolatry. Likewise where he saith, that the soul of the Emperor Trajan was exempted from infernal punishments, by the prayers of Gregory the Great. Both which you may read in Damascenus, in his oration of those who died in the faith." This man was a great defender of images against the emperor Leo Isaurus, and his son Constantine, the fifth of that name, surnamed Copronymus ; in a synod of three hundred and thirty-eight bishops, oonvocated by the same Constantine, held at Constantinople, a.d. 754, which also was called the seventh oecumenic synod, he with Germanus and George, sometimes patriarchs of Constantinople, was condemned as an idolater and worshipper of wood and images, as appears from the acts of that synod, which are inserted in the sixth acts of the second synod of Nice. Amongst his own he. was called Chrysorrhoas, for his eloquence. He died a.d. 760. The Damacene prunes are also famous, which were wont to be carried > Lib. vi. p. 249. ' Lib. xiv. Lib. viii. q. 4. Lib. xiii. «ap. 4. Lib. de Virgin, and Coel. Rhodigin, lib. vi. cap. S. ' De Hist. GrEcis, lib. ii. cap. 24. * Exercit. 13, adver. Baron, sect. 38. 230 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. IX. from the city Damascus to Rome, together with small figs called cottana, of which Juvenal, Satyr, iii. 85. By the way, we may observe, that this kind of small figs was so called, as Hesychius witnesseth, Korrava, from the Hebrew word, ilap, " little." Hence, Martial saith elegantly :' ". These cottana, which have been sent to thee in a round turned pannier, if they were bigger, they would be figs." This name cottana, among the Cretians, signified also a virgin, as witnesseth the same Hesychius, in the forScited place, which is deduced from the same root, nsjjp, "little," to wit, " girl." If you desire to know more of this most ancient city, you may consult the Itinerary of Benjamin Tudelensis, and Hoffman's Universal Lexicon. To the synagogues. How great a multitude of Jews was at Damascus, may be gathered from what Josephus saith :^ that under Nero ten thousand Jews unarmed, being by chance gathered in the public baths, were there oppressed, and slain by the inhabitants of Damascus. It is very probable that many of the Jews converted to Christ, did, to avoid the persecution stirred up at Jerusalem, fly to Damascus ; therefore, Paul not being content to have vexed them at Jerusalem, he willingly undertook the pains to prosecute them thither. For the Governor of Damascus, under Aretas, the king of Arabia the Stony and Damascus, was a great favourer and abettor of the persecutor of Christ's disciples, as appears from 2 Cor. xi. 32. That if he found any, &c. As much as to say, that a licence and liberty might be given him to bring all such as he found pro- fessors of the Christian religion, without difference of sex, bound as malefactors to Jerusalem. " The Romans," saith Grotius, "allowed the Sanhedrim the privilege of taking, and beating, not only over the Jews of Palestine, but also without Palestine, where there were synagogues that willingly acknowledged the jurisdiction of the Sanhedrim in matters pertaining to religion." Of this way. That is, of this sect and institution, as below, ch. xix. 9, 23 ; xxii. 4 ; xxiv. 14. 3. There shined round about him a light from heaven. Like lightning brighter than the sun, as may be seen below, ch. xxii. 6; xxvi. 13. 4. And he fell to the earth. Because he was struck, and as it ' Lib. xiii. Epigram 28. » De Bell. Jud. lib. ii. cap. 25. YE.R. V.J LITEKALLY EXPLAINED. 231 were blasted, with the brightness of that light sent to him from heaven. He heard a voice. To wit, descend from heaven with that light. Saying. To wit, in a Hebrew dialect, as Paul himself saith below, ch. xxvi. 14. Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me ? Augustine saith elegantly, as his manner is:' " The Head being to ascend into heaven, he commended his members upon earth, and departed. Now you do not find Christ speaking upon earth. You find him speaking but in hesfcven, and from heaven itself. Why? Because his members were trod upon on earth. Therefore he said from above to Saul the persecutor, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? I ascended into heaven, nevertheless I lie upon earth, as yet. I sit here at the right hand of the Father ; there I am hungry, thirsty, and a stranger, as yet." Believers are the mystical body of Christ, and his mystical members; hence whatever is done to them, Christ takes it as done to himself. See Matt. xxv. 40, 45; Luke x. 16. 5. Who art thou, Lord? As much as to say. Whose voice do I hear? And the Lord said. As much as to say, Christ, who was in heaven, and spake from heaven itself, answered. I am Jesus, &c. As much as to say, You hear the voice of that Jesus of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest, while you pour out your rage and storms of your wrath upon my servants. It is hard. That is, it is a very troublesome and vain labour. " If thou beatest the pricks with thy fists, thou hurtest thy hands," says Plautus.^ To kick against the pricks. The Greek and Roman writers fre- quently use this proverb against such as attempt a thing that will happen ill to them. For if oxen being thrust and galled with the goad, while they draw the plough or cart, should kick, while they would hurt the goad, they do but hurt themselves, because as the scholiast upon Pindarus, in the end of his second Pythia, saith, " They are more sorely stricken," and beating their heel against the sharp goad, they are pricked again with its point. Therefore, by this proverbial phrase the Lord Jesus declares that Saul's wrestling against him was to his own great hurt, so that if he desisted not from applying himself to ruin the Christians, it would come to pass that he should die a sad death. * Tract. 10 in Epist. Joannis. ' In Trucul. act. iv. sc. 2, ver. SS.. 232 THE ACTS OF THE HOIY 4P0STI,ES [CHAP. IX. 6. And he trembling and astonished, &c. As much as to say. But Saul being terrified with the brightness of the heavenly light, and the voice which came from heaven, puts off his wolf-like fierceness, and puts on a sheep-like disposition, and also freely and willingly gives himself to do the commands of the great Shepherd of souls, whom he lately despised. For the Lord Jesus sends him to the city of Damascus, that he might there be taught of him what he himself would have him do, to whom he should commit that charge from heaven, 7. And the men which journeyed with him. That is, they who were Paul's companions in his journey to Damascus. Stood speechless. That is, being astonished at the strangeness of this admirable thing, they stood unmoved, or, that I may use Virgil's phrase, "they stuck immoveable to the ground." To stand, here denotes not a posture of the body, but a mere staying, and is opposed to going forward, not to lying prostrate, seeing below, ch. xxvi. 14, that Paul's companions fell upon the earth. So Gen. xix. 17: Neither stay thou in all the plain, that is, do not tarry nor delay. Lev. xiii. 37: If the scall be at a stay, that is, spread no farther. Hearing a voice. To wit, sent from heaven, which beat upon their ears, although, as it is said below, ch. xxii. 9, they understood not the meaning and signification of the words; either because they were not skilful in the Hebre-.v dialect, wherein Christ spake to Saul, as may be seen below, ch. xxvi. 14, or, because they indeed heard the sound of the voice, but, in the meantime, did not exactly take up the words of that sound. "They heard," saith famous Lightfoot, " Hp, 'a voice,' but they heard not "ia"j, a ' word.'" The like happened, John xii. 29. Therefore "to hear," below, ch. xxii. 9, is put for "to understand," as Gen. xi. 7; xlii. 23; Deut. xxviii. 49; 2 Kings xviii. 26; Isaiah xxxvi. 11; Jer. v. 15 ; 1 Cor. xiv. 2, 21. But seeing no man. Although they Kfted up their eyes to heaven, whence the voice came, that they might see who spake to Saul. " This," saith Beza, " is the force of the word Sriuiguv in this place. For otherwise it were no wonder that they saw none, who being struck with fear, durst not lift up their eyes." Saul only saw Him who spake to him, as Dan. x. 7. 8. And Saul arose from the earth. The Greek hath it, "He was raised up," as Daniel was, Dan. viii. 18. And when his eyes were opened, he saw no man. That is, his eye- VEU. X.] LITliEALLY JEXPLAINED. 233 lids, which were shut, being separated, he saw nothing at all, because his eyes were dazzled with the great brightness of that heavenly light which shone round about him, ver. 3, as appears from the verse immediately following, and ver. 12, 17, 18, and below, ch. xxii. 11. But they led him hy the hand. As blind men are usually led. So Saul, who intended to lead the disciples of Christ bound from Damascus to Jerusalem, he himself is led, as it were, bound to Damascus. 9. And he was three days without sight. It is probable that in these three days wherein he was deprived of his bodily sight, the Lord Jesus did make known to him the doctrine of the gospel by internal visions, that he might truly say, that he did not receive, nor learn the gospel from any mortal man, but by Jesus Christ, who sits at the right hand of the Father, revealing it to him. Gal. i. 12. And neither did eat nor drink. As the Jews of old, for three days. Esth. iv. 16. This he did, partly to give an outward testimony of his inward repentance for his former doings, partly to be excited to pray with fervency. For TertuUian saith well:' " We are much more powerful in spirit, and lively in heart for spiritual things while fasting, then when that dwelling-house of the inner man is stuffed with food, and overwhelmed with wine." The Jews were forbidden to drink upon that day wherein they fasted: so that it was accounted a breach of their fast, if they should swallow a drop of wine or water. They allowed one to waoh his mouth, and wipe it, provided he did spit it out again. As may be seen in "Jiiy F?;©, in the Treatise of a Fast. They except from this concession, that fast which they keep upon the day of pardon, which they call Jom Kippur, and upon the ninth day of the fifth month, which they call Ab ; upon these days they think it not lawful to wash the mouth. 10. And there was a certain disciple. CEcumenius calls this Ananias a deacon, and thinks him to have been one of the seventy disciples who adhered to Jesus Christ, while he was conversant upon earth, next to the apostles. Augustine will have him a presbyter. Dorotheus writes, that afterward he was made bishop of Damascus. ' Adv. Psych. 234 THE ACTS OT' THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. IX. In a vision. Divinely excited. See what we have said above, ch. ii. 17. Behold, I am here, Lord. A Hebraism, that is, I am ready to receive, and do thy commands. 11. Go into the street which is called Straight. That is, into that street of Damascus, which is called Straight, the Greek,s call it JEuthia, perhaps, because it was plainer, and straighter than any other street of that city. Of Tarsus. That is, born in Tarsus, in that most famous city of Cilicia. See below, ch. xxi. 39 ; xxii. 3. For behold he prayeth. Luke shows that Saul, during his three days' fast, was continually taken up in praying. 12. And he hath seen a vision. To wit, Saul, with the eyes of his mind. They are the words of Luke, telling that Saul saw Ananias laying his hands upon him at that very time, wherein the Lord spake to Ananias concerning Saul. " It is a vision," saith Macrobius, " when one seeth that which falls out in the same manner that it appeared to him." Suetonius, in the life of Augustus : " M. Cicero, having pursued C. Ctesar into the capitol, by chance told his former night's dream to his intimates, that a child of a comely countenance being let down from heaven in a golden chain, stood at the door of the capitol, and that Jupiter gave him a scourge ; afterward having on a sudden seen Augustus, whom, as yet being unknown to the most part of them, his uncle Caesar had called to the sacrifice, he affirmed it to be him, whose image appeared to him in his sleep." In the same place a little before, of Q. Catulus : " And the next day having met Augustus, being otherwise unknown to him, beheld him not without admira- tion, and said he was most like the boy of which he dreamed." Thus Ovid says : " As I dreamed to see men by order, such do I perceive and see by order." Apuleius saith,' " I presently per- ceived one of the holy priests, beside the mark of his foot, also in the rest of his habit and carriage agreeing exactly with a night image, whom afterwards I knew to be called Asinus Marcellus." Which places, though taken out of the writings of heathens, do most fitly illustrate this narration. For although Luke mentions only his name, and the laying on of hands, yet it is probable that Saul did see Ananias, as if he did view him with his eyes, to wit, ' Asin. Aurei. lib. xr. VER. XVI.j LITERALLY EXPLAINEP. 235 his countenance, stature, and all the rest of his complexion : and therefore when he recovered afterwards his sight, he knew them to agree perfectly with his vision. See what we have said above, eh. ii. 17. And putting his hands on him, &c. See what is noted above, viii. 17, and below, ver. 17. 13. How much evil he hath done to thy saints. The Christians are frequently so called, partly, because by the very profession of Christ's doctrine, and of their faith in him, they are selected from the common sort of unbelievers to be God's peculiar people, whom God himself, by the merits and intercession of Christ, appointed to endow with a heavenly inheritance ; partly, because by their pro- fessed holiness of life, they are eminent beyond all other mortals, if they be not only Christians in name, but really such. 14. And here, &c. As much as to say. And (omitting his other villainies) he now cometh with power to bind all such as have given up their names to thee. From the chief priests. That is, from the princes of the San- hedrim. For it is a synecdoche, whereby the whole great San- hedrim is designed by its noblest part. That call on thy name. To call on Christ, or the name of Christ, is to give up his name to Christ, and to profess himself his disciple. So below, ver. 12, and 1 Cor. i. 2, To name the name of Christ, is put in the same sense, Eom. xv. 20 ; 2 Tim. ii. 19. 15. He is a chosen vessel unto me. A Hebraism. That is, a most choice instrument, " a vessel for God's use," saith Rabbi Israel. " Neither," saith Grotius,' " did Polybius, speaking of Damocles, use the word, (jk£voq, a vessel, in another sense ; for this man was a most profitable vessel for service, and most fit for busi- ness." Compare 2 Tim. ii. 20, 21. To bear my name. That is, that he might be a publisher of my glory. Before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel. As much as to say, that by his preaching, my name may be famous among the nations, yea, and among their kings, as well as among the Jews. This refers to these places, Isa. Ixix. 6 ; Jer. i. 10. 16. For I will show unto him, &c. As much as to say, I will .foreshow him how many things he must undergo for preaching my name; to wit, popular hatred, the rage of the Gentiles, prisons, ' Ad Psal. Ii. 236 THE ACTS OF THK HOLY APOSTLES [OHAP. IX. gtripes, hunger, thirst, shipwreck, and a cruel death; and yet he will preach 'my name, and willingly sujBfer what he did to others for my name's sake. 17. He entered into the house. To wit, into Judas's, where Saul lodged, as above said, ver. 11. And putting his hands on him. Putting on of hands is a visible sign of prayer. Whence below, xxviii. 8 ; Jas. v. 14 ; health restored by a miracle is attributed jointly to both. The Lord, &c. As much as to say, Christ sent me, who am but a common disciple, not an apostle, to interpret unto you his wiU, that by his grace you may receive the sight which you lost, being dazzled with the brightness, of the heavenly light; which shall be unto you a sign of an inward vision that you shall receive from Christ himself, through the abundant communication of the gifts of the Holy Ghost, without any human help, as soon as you shall recover your bodily sight. 18. As it had been scales. Which, when Saul's eyes were dazzled with the heavenly light, were congealed, and hardened of the humours which fell from his brain. And he arose, and was baptized. After Christ's institution^ by Ananias's advice, as may be seen below, xxii. 16. 19. And ichen he had received meat, he was strengthened. He did not refresh his body, though spent with three days' fasting, until he had abundantly satisfied his soul, enlivened through faith, by receiving baptism. Certain days. For as Paul himself writes. Gal. i. 17, he in a short time went out of Damascus (which then was under the domi- nion of the Arabians) unto Arabia, which is the first nation wherein Paul preached the gospel, being like Moses in this, who had his first station in Arabia, after he had left Egypt. So the prophecy, Isa. Ixii. 16, is mystically fulfilled. With the disciples which were at Damascus. That is, he joined himself with Christ's followers ; there were a good many such at Damascus, since the time of that dispersion, of which above, ch. viii. 3. 20. And straightway, &c. As much as to say, without any delay he taught in the assemblies of the Jews at Damascus, that Jesus of Nazareth is the Messiah or Christ, promised in the law and the prophets, by weighty and solid arguments, which he learned from no man, but from Christ himself. Compare ver. 22; Gal.i. 15, 16. VEE. XXIT.] LITEUALLY EXPLAINED. 237 21. That he is the Son of God. He saith presently, ver. 22, That this is very Christ. It seems this surname was commonly- given to the Messiah. For Nathaniel saith, John i. 49, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God, thou art the hing of Israel, to wit, out of the second Psalm, which the ancient Hebrews, in the abstruse sense, interpreted of the Messiah. Therefore, where Peter in Matthew, xvi. 16, calls him Clirist the Son of the living God, Mark and Luke satisfied themselves with the name Christ. And no wonder, seeing, as Origen saith excellently, " What was divine in that man Jesus whom we understand, the very same was the only begotten Son of God." Is not this, &c. As much as to say. Is Saul also among the prophets? 1 Sam. x. 11. TTiat destroyed all them that called upon this name in Jerusalem. That is, ra.ged with great cruelty against all Christ's disciples at Jerusalem. " The Greek word," saith Grotius, " which is rendered, 'destroyed,' signifieth to ' vex.' Paul useth the same word in this history," Gal. i. 13, 23. And came hither. To wit, to Damascus. 22. But Saul increased the more in strength. To wit, in know- ledge and liberty of speaking. Whence in some copies is added, " in speech." And confounded the Jews. As much as to say. And being thus strengthened by the Holy Ghost, he confuted, reproved and con- vinced the Jews. Proving. Greek, avfifii^d^wv : Supply, avrovg, " them," that is, " teaching them," as the Arabian turns it : " teaching them for certain," as the Ethiopia renders it. It answers to the Hebrew word, y3n, which is rendered " to instruct, to cause to understand," Isa. xl. 14 ; Dan. ix. 22 ; and the word, yiin, that is rendered, " to make known," Exod. xviii. 16; Deut. iv. 9; Isa. Ix. 13; also nlin, "to teach," Exod. iv. 12, 15; Lev. x. 11; Psa. xxxii. 10. '2v/ji(5i- (id^iiv, is properly" to join things by art, that by an indissoluble tie they may stick together. But he who teacheth any other, allures him to himself, and by persuading and convincing him, does, as it were, knit and glue him to himself. Hence, in Hesychius, avfi- BlBiimg is interpreted " persuasion, doctrine, faith ;" avfjj5i(5dTO, " let him teach ; " avfi^i^aaQivTiQ, " those that have been taught." Hither belongeth that of Paul, 1 Cor. ii. 16, Who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him ? Greek, avfi^i^d(ju 238 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. IX. avTov, that is, as Lud. de Dieu interprets it, " that he may thus convince him by his reasons, as to knit him^ and, as it were, glue him to himself." 23. And after that many days were fulfilled. By those many days are. to be understood the three years which Paul spent in Arabia, whither, as we observed above, ver. 19, out of Gal. i. 17, he was gone soon after his conversion, although Luke, who was not with him, does not make mention of this journey. " Paul," saith Capellus, Gal. i. 17, "denies that he came to Jerusalem to the apostles, immediately after his conversion, but affirms that he went straight from Damascus to Arabia, and from thence returned to Da- mascus. Lastly, that after three years he came to Jerusalem. These three years must be begun nowhere but at Paul's conversion, that by this Paul might testify that he came not to Jerusalem, until the end of three years after his conversion, to them which were apostles before him. This being granted, it must needs be that Paul spent not those three years in Damascus, but in Arabia. For if a great part of them Avas spent at Damascus, seeing that Damascus was distant from Jerusalem but a very few days' journey^ and that there was great commerce betwixt the Damascenes and the Jews at Jerusalem, how could it be, when Paul came from Damascus to Jerusalem, that all the believers did avoid him, not knowing that he was converted to the faith of Christ ? Hence, then, it seems a strong argument may be drawn, that Paul, immediately after his conversion, went from Damascus to Arabia, and that he spent those three years there, after which time, when he came to Damascus, and immediately had snares laid for him by the Jews, that being let down in the night-time by the wall in a basket, he came to Jerusalem; and that at first the faithful fled from him, because he spent all the time since his conversion in Arabia, among that people who had little or no commerce with those of Jerusalem. So that thus they might be ignorant of his conversion, which could not so easily be, if Paul had spent those three years, or the most part of them, at Damascus." The Jews took counsel to kill him. By a judgment of zeal; of which we spake above, ch. vii. 57. 24. And they watched the gates. The Jews, to wit, of the city, that he might not escape and be gone. See how soon that which Christ foretold above, ver. 16, is fulfilled. 25. Let him down by the wall. As Kahab of old did the spies : YliU. XXIX.J LTTEUALLY EXPLAINED. 230 she let them down by a cord through the window, Josh. ii. 15. So also David was let down through a window, 1 Sam. xix. 12. Clemens Alexandrinus, Strom. 4, 7, saith excellently, " What hazards must be undergone, and what shunned by him, who neither wisheth for nor feareth death, Christ hath left to be judged by God's glory, and the use of men." " Although a Christian fly, he flieth not for fear, but obeying his Master's command, Matt. x. 23, and keeping himself pure for the salvation of others, to whom he may be useful," says Origen against Celsus. Let him doum by the wall in a basket. With cords, as Jeremiah, Jer. xxxviii. 6. 26. And when Saul was come to Jerusalem. Paul the apostle going to Damascus was converted to the knowledge of the heavenly truth, and faith in Jesus Christ. " This year," saith Cameraritis, " is put the first of his apostolic office, and it falls in the thirty- fifth year of Christ, and the twentieth of Tiberius's reign. The second year he went to Arabia, and from thence having come to Damascus, he fell into danger, whence he was delivered, being let down by a wall in a basket. This year is now Paul's third year, and of Christ the thirty-seventh, and that time falls in with the end of Tiberius's reign. Upon the thirty-eighth year of Christ, and the first of Caius Csesar, and his own fourth year, he came to Jerusalem to see Peter." See Gal. i. 17, 18. He essayed to join himself to the disciples. That is, he end ea- voured to become acquainted with them, and converse with them> as believers do with one another, above, ch. v. 13 ; and below, ch. X. 28. 27. But Barnabas. Of whom above, ch. iv. 36. Brought him to the apostles. To wit, which were at Jerusalem ; to Peter, to see whom he mainly came thither, and to James the Lord's brother, Gal. i. 15, 19. And declared. To wit, Barnabas. How he had preached boldly at Damascus in the name of Jesus. That is, openly and publidy preached Jesus and his doctrine. 28. And he was with them. That is, with Peter and James. Cominy in and going out. That is, executing his apostolical office. See of this manner of speaking above, ch. i. 21. 29. Jnd he spake boldly in the name of the Lord Jesus. As much as to say, he strongly maintained the cause of Christ. And disp uted against the -Grecians. Who they are that are here 240 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. IX. called Grecians, Hellenists, we have explained above, eh. vi. 1, and it'is no wonder that Paul, as being of Tarsus, did dispute with them peculiarly, and by themselves, and that with the greater desire, because in that controversy raised by the very same men against Stephen, they found none more for their faction than this same Paul. " Him also," saith Beza, " they slandered, that when he could not obtain marriage of the high priest's daughter, being moved with anger, he embraced the Christian religion. Many such like fables doth that murdering spirit invent this day against the faithful servants of God, both alive and dead." Ebion the heresiarch certainly, as Epiphanius relates, Haer. 30, slandereth Paul; that being a Greek, and his father also being a Greek, he should have gone up to Jerusalem, and that having tarried there a short while, he fell in love with the high priest's daughter, and hoping to enjoy her in marriage, was circumcised, and embraced the Jewish religion : but that his hope being frustrated, he was en- raged with anger and wrath against the law. The very simplicity -of the truth, wherewith the Holy Spirit has again and again sealed the history of Paul in the holy scriptures, refuteth enough the gross calumny of Ebion against him. But they went about to slay Mm. Inhuman and cruel hypocrisy and superstition, when they find themselves unable to resist the truth, they, like ravenous beasts, with blind and precipitous violence run on to persecute it. 30. They brought him. Who was forewarned by a vision that he should leave Jerusalem, as may be seen below, ch. xxii. 17, 18. The Syriac adds, « In the night." To Ccesarea. To wit, Philippi, situated about Mount Lebanon, at the meeting together of Jor and Dan, where Jordan hath its beginning. See what we have noted concerning this city above, ch. viii. 4 ; Matt. xvi. 14. And sent him forth to Tarsus. A most famous city of Cilicia, where Saul himself was born, as may be seen below, ch. xxi. 39, xxii. 4. Of this city Strabo saith, " Tarsus is situated in a plain ; it was built by the Argivi, who with Triptolemus wandered, seeking for lo. The river Cydnus passeth through it to the very place where young champions exercise their strength. Its fipringa not being far distant from it, and its channel running through a huge valley, whence presently the river falls into the city; the river is cold and sharp, whereby it cures both men and cattle that VEU. XXXIV.J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 241 are troubled with the gout, or thickness of sinews. They of Tarsus were so addicted to the study of philosophy, and that discipline which they call encyelia, that they outstripped Athens, Alexandria, and any other place that can be named, where there were schools and exercises of philosophers and of learning." Tarsus brought forth men eminent for learning, among others' Hermogenes, who wrote with great praise of the art of rhetoric, whose work is yet extant. Stephanus Byzantius saith i that Tarsus was built by Sardanapalus the last king of the Assyrians. Others, in Dio Chrysostomus,^ say it was built by heroes, or giants. Ammianus Marcellirius saith'' that Perseus, the son of Jupiter, and Danaes were the builders of Tarsus, of which judgment was Solinus, and Lucan, who therefore calls it Persea. 31. Then had the churches rest. To wit, the heat of persecution being assuaged, when the violent and furious rage of the church's enemies, which was stirred up at the sight of Saul, was laid. There is no war contrary to the church's peace, but persecution. And were ed^ed. That is, and were confirmed, as Paul useth the word, 1 Cor. i. 10. Walking in the fear of the Lord. ■ A Hebraism, that is, most reverently worshipping the Lord. The like construction is in 1 Mac. vi. 23, 59. 32. Passed throughout all quarters. That is, went about from one place to another, encouraging the brethren. Which dwelt at Lydda. Lydda, which was afterwards called Diospolis, is a city of the tribe of Ephraim, not far from the Mediterranean 'Sea, upon the confines of the tribe of Dan. It is also called "vh in the Hebrew text, 1 Chron. viii. 12. This city, as Josephus relates,* its inhabitants being gone up to Jerusalem, to the feast of tabernacles, was burnt by Cestus. Benjamin in his Itinerary saith, that Lydda in his time was called XTKO, now it is commonly called St. George. 33. Named Eneas. Eneas, or as the poets pronounce it Aineias, is the Greek interpretation of the Jewish name Hillel. 34. Arise, and make thy bed. He is not commanded to rise and walk, but he himself (not another, as was usual) who for eight years' space could not move one of his members, is commanded to rise, make up, smooth, and fit his bed for lying in, which was dis- ordered, uneven, and troublesome to lie upon, as it useth to be by * Lib. xiv. = Cap. 41. ' Lib. iv. * Bell. Jud. lib. iv. cap. 23. R 242 THE ACTS OF THE HOLTf APOSTLES [CHAl'. IXv the tossings of sick people ; this was a sure argument that strength ■was restored to his members. 35. Saron. Saron, or Sarona, or Saronas, is the name of a region beyond Jordan, upon the borders of the tribes of Dan and Ephraim, upon the coast of the Mediterranean Sea, fi'om Joppa, even to Csesarea of Palestine, rising below Lydda, of which region, 1 Chron. xxvii. 29, and Isaiah xxxiii. 9. See our literal explana- tion on Cant. ii. 1. The metropolis of this region was called Lesharon, or Lasharon, which belonged to Saron. Whence among the kings conquered by Joshua, Josh. ixii. 18, there is. The king of Lasharon. The Vulgate Latin, Pagninus, and the English in- terpreter, judged rightly that the letter lamed did belong to the denomination of the city, as also in the Judaic map, j\~<^. is a royal city, upon a hill called the Hill of Saron, in the tribe of Ephraim. Luke seems here to call this place the Saron, by an emphasis, for there is another city called Saron, beyond Jordan, in the tribe of Gad, upon the river Arnon, of which, 1 Chron. v. 16, 36. Tahitha, lohich by interpretation is called Dorcas. That is, whose proper Syrian name Tabitha, from the Hebrew "32?, a roe, was by the Greeks expressed by their proper name Dorcas. " She was called Dorcas," saith Grotius, "among the Greeks, even as Thomas, Didymus : Cephas, Peter : " see below, ver. 39. Full of good works, and alms-deeds which she did. A Hebrew phrase. That is, marvellously given to every praise-worthy work, chiefly to ofBoes of charity, by which our neighbours are helped, and the poor's wants supplied. 37. Whom, when they had washed. The custom of washing the bodies of the dead, was used by Greeks, Latins, and Hebrews. -3Elian writes of the lUyrian Dardans, " That they were only Avashed thrice in their whole life, to wit, after they are born, when they are married, and when they die." In Euripides, Creon king of the Thebans calls Jocasta to wash the body of her son. Misenus the truriipeter is washed, and anointed, before he is buried, in Virgil, JEn. vi. ver. 218, 219. Where Servius cites out of Ennius: "A good woman washed and anointed the body of Tarquinius." Maimonides, in his Abridgment Talmudic, called rrptn l', book 4, of the fourth part, ch. iv., of Mourning and Mourners. "It is," saith he, "the custom in Israel, about the dead and their burial, that when any is dead, they shut his -eyes, ' Var. Hist. lib. iv. c.ip. 1. AEU. X.XXIX.J LITERALLY EXPLAlNiD. 243 and if he hath hia mouth open, it roust be shut, tying a ligature about his jaws, that it open not again, the place at which he voids his excrements is stopped, but this after the body is washed. Then he is anointed with ointments made up of divers kinds of perfumes, and his head being shaved, the body is rolled up in white linen, prepared for the purpose, which are not of great value, that an equality may be kept betwixt the rich and the poor. Also the face of the dead, before he be put in the coflSn, is covered with a hand- kerchief, the price of which must not exceed the fourth part of a shekel," which fourth part is equal to an Attic drachma, and to the Koman denary ; and is equivalent to sevenpence half-penny of the now English money. " Being then put into the coffin," saith Maimonides further, "he is carried upon men's shoulders, even to the burying place, and there before the body be buried, there are some things read, which have been written by their ancestors for this purpose, whereby divine, justice is set forth, and the sins of men exaggerated, for which they deserved death, and God is en- treated that he may exercise his justice, so as not forget himself to be merciful. Then the corpse, together with the bier, upon which it lay upon its back, being put in a cave, is covered. Lastly, they go to the mourners, and something is recited by them for their comfort. Which being ended, every one goes to his business, neither doth there any difference appear betwixt the rich and the poor, the noble and the ignoble, neither in the burial of the dead nor in the comfort of the living." 38. And forasmuch as Lydda was nigh unto Joppa. There are said to be six miles betwixt Joppa and Lydda. See what we have said of Joppa in our literal explanation, Jonah i, 3. 39. Shewing the coats and garments. That is, woven works, the monuments of her hands, as Virgil speaks. The words in the Greek signify eoats and cloaks. Which Dorcas made while she loas with, them. So it is in the Greek, but the Vulgate interpreter takes the words, as if it were said, " which she njade for them," So also Cyprian, in his book of alms and works, doth take them. " Tabitha," saith he, " being- very much given to the doing of good works and alms-deeds, ■when she was sick and dead, Peter is called to her lifeless corpse ; and when according to his apostolical humanity he came, the widows stood about him weeping, and requesting, showing the cloaks, and the coats, and all the garments which tliey had taken K 2 244 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. IX. before, neither did they intercede for the dead with their own words, but with her works. Peter knew that what was thus asked, might be obtained ; and that Christ's assistance would not be want- ing to praying widows, when he himself was clothed in the person of those widows. "When therefore he prayed upon his knees, and this fit advocate for the poor and widows had presented to God the prayers addressed to him, having turned about to the body that lay already washed upon a table, Tabitha, saith he, rise in the name of Jesus, Christ. Neither did He, who said in his gospel that he would give whatever was asked in his name, fail Peter, but brought pre- sent help. Death therefore is suspended, and her spirit restored ; and to the wonder and astonishment of all, the revived body is restored to the light of the world; so powerful were the deserts of charity, such was the efficacy of good works. She who gave supplies to the 4abouring widows merited, that is, obtained, to be restored to life by the prayer of the widows." The ancient ladies used to make woven garments with their own hands, as Servius hath noted upon JEneid xi. 74. See 1 Sam. ii. 19; Prov. xxxi. '13; Tobit ii. 11, &c. 40. But Peter put them all forth. That is, commanded them to go forth, that, being solitary and retired, he might pray with greater freedom. And kneeled down and prayed. That all the parts of him might be employed in the worship of God, and that the outward exercise of the body, might help the weakness of the mind. " It is our part," saith Calvin, "as often as we kneel, that the inward sub- mission of our heart answer the ceremony, that it may not be vain and deceitful." Tabitha, arise. This speaking to the dead body, doth more clearly hold out the power of God in raising the dead, than if in the third person it should be said, Let this body be enlivened, and revive again. Therefore Ezekiel, holding out the deliverance of the peo- ple under the type of the resurrection, ch. xxxvii. 4, Dry hones saith he, hear the word of the Lord. And Christ, John v. 25, The dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God, and they that shall hear shall live. That was the real voice of Christ, which, being sent out at Peter's mouth, restored her spirit to Tabitha's body. The circumstances which follow, are put to confirm the truth of the miracle. 42. Believed, &c. Now the fruit of the miracle appears manifold. VER. II.] LITiillAiLY EXPLAINED. 245 ■ For God comforted the poor ; a pious matron is restored unto the church, in whose death there was a great loss, and many are called to the faith. For though Peter was the minister of so great a miracle, yet he keeps not men to himself, but directs them to Christ. 43. With one Simon a tanner. It was a custom, even among the learnedest of the Jews, to learn some trade, so that when it was requisite, they might sustain themselves, and not burden others. So Rabbi Jose was a skinner, Kabbi Jochanan a shoemaker,. Rabbi Juda a baker. Rabbi Meir a scrivener. Josephus saith,' of Asinasus and Asilaeus, Jews in Babylon, " Their mothers set them to learn the weavers' trade, which is not esteemed indecent to those nations, where even men are makers of yarn." So the apostles were fishers after Christ's resurrection. Paul, .who was trained up in sacred and profane learning at Tarsus and at Jerusalem, made tents, as well as Aquila, born in Pontus; below, ch. xviii. 3. CHAPTER X. 1. There was in Cesarea. Which, in the time of the Romans, was the head city of Palestine, as we learn from Tacitus, lib. viii. Cornelius the centurion, who is spoken of here, was made bishop of this city by Peter, as Isidore saith in his Chronicle, or rather Lucas Tudensis in his additions to it. Cornelius. This name shows him to be a Roman, or at least of Italian extraction, and in him began to be fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah, ch. ii. 4, 11. Centurion of the band, which is called the Italian band. That is, of the Italian legion. " The Italian legion," saith Grotius, " is on an ancient stone, which Lipsius on Tacitus, Hist. ii. mentions, and Tacitus himself oftentimes." 2. A devout man, and one that feared God. That is, a worshipper of the true God, according to that which reason and the law of Moses did teach him to be most agreeable to inward godliness. Such are called "holy amongst the nations" by the Talmudists; " devout Greeks," below, ch. vii. 4. ' Antiq. lib. xviii. cap. 12, 246 THE ACTS OF THK HOLY APOSTLES [cilAP. X. With all his house. Cornelius dkl govern his family in the fear of the Lord, contemning the fear of danger, which might thence foUoAY, for the Jewish religion was very odious in those days: neither was it lawful for any Roman to embrace any strange religion as they called it. " Wherefore," saith Calvin, very well, " although the sincere profession of the gospel is much at this day decried, yet that fearfultiess is too criminal, if, on the account of that unjust hatred, any one should not dare dedicate his family, by a holy institution, to Grod's worship." Giving much alms to the poor. That is, To all poor Jews, whom he loved the rather for that they worshipped the one true God, and with open bowels did bestow what God's goodness had afforded him. And praying to God alway. That is. Assiduous in pouring forth prayers to the one true God, to which the daily benefits of God do invite us and stir us up. 3. He saw in a vision evidently. Not in dreams but waking, with corporeal eyes, not ravished in spirit without himself, as it happened to Peter after, ver. 10, and ch. xi. 5. About the ninth hour of the day. That is, about the hour of evening prayer and sacrifice. See our notes above, ch. iii. 1. An angel of God. Out of God's goodness, an angel and an apostle are sent to the centurion, who had rightly made use of the heavenly gifts bestowed on him, that he might be enriched with the full light of the gospel. 4. What is it. Lord? As if he should say. Command what thou wilt. Lord, I will obey thy commands. Are come up for a memorial before God. That Is, thy alms and thy prayers have been pleasing to God. The phrase is taken from the legal incense. " For," saith Grotius, " that is properly called rrna'TN, in Greek fivri/ioawov, 'a memorial,' Leviticus and elsewhere. And the smoke of the incense is said to ascend. Rev. viii. 4. But this incense was a type of prayers. Rev. v. 8 ; viii. 3. Prayer, say the ancients, is carried up by two wings, fasting and the works of mercy." 5. And now. That is, now therefore. The angel shows him the apostle, and the apostle shows him Christ. 6. He shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do. That is, as it is expounded, ch. xi. 14 : Who shall speak words to thee, in which thou and all thy family shall be saved. As if he should say, he VEli. IX.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 247 will instruct thee in the knowledge of Christ (which is the only- way to salvation), that thou, and thy whole house, may be saved. God uses no other way, but the instrument of preaching, to instil into men the knowledge of the gospel. " This is God's ordinary way which he hath established, arid we may not expect another," most truly saith (and proves it, from Eom. x. 14) my dearest wife's uncle, the Kev. Samuel Gardner, Doctor of Divinity, one of his majesty's chaplains in ordinary, in his grave and learned sermon on the dignity and duty of the ministers of the gospel, printed in 1672. 7. A soldier, fearing God. All the domestics of Cornelius feared the Lord, as is said before, ver. 2, but all the soldiers which were under his command, were not godly and religious. We have a like TTapaXXriXtffjuoc of soldiers and domestics. Matt. viii. 9. Of them that waited on him. That is, tliey waited before the doors to receive his commands. Ovid, speaking of a lover and a soldier, saith, " This tends his mistfesa's, but that his captain's, doors." 8. Wlien he had declared all these things to them. Cornelius explained all things to his soldiers and servants, the more to encourage them to perform a command, which they saw was more God's than man's. " He doubted not," saith Calvin, " to trust those with this great secret, whom lie had before trained honestly up." 9. Peter went up to the house-top. Greek, "to the roof of the house." The Jews built the roofs of their houses flat, not spire- wise. Jerome, in his epistle to Sunia and Fretela, says, "that in the eastern provinces, that is called BtJitia, which the Latins call tectum. For, in Palestine and Egypt, or in those places where the holy bible was writ or interpreted, their houses are not ridged but flat roofed, which at Rome they call leads or balconies, that is, flat roofs supported by beams placed across." The Vulgate translation uses this word for a house, Prov. xxi. 9 ; xxv. 24. Anselm, on Matthew, fol. 45 : " In Palestine they used to make their roofs flat, not coped. Even so the temple of Solomon was made flat above, and in the circuit of the gallery there were grates, lest any one should unawares fall down : and the doctors had there their seats, that they might from thence speak to the people." To pray. To wit, secretly, and without interruption. Suetonius 248 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [CHAP. X. says of Augustus, " If at any time he desired to do anything in secret, and without interruption, he had an apartment above for that purpose," &c. Ahout the sixth hour. That is, as the famous Drusius interprets it, " The time of prayer, which they call the prayer of sacrifice, or of oblation ; which began at half an hour past six, and lasted till half an hour past nine. It was also the hour of dining, therefore in the book, whose title is Principium Sapientia, it is called the time of refreshment. Before this prayer they tasted not of any- thing, and it was of great esteem amongst the ancients." See what is said above,' ch. ii. 15, iii. 1. 10. Would have eaten. Greek, "tasted;" that is, eaten. "A metonyme of the designed effect," saith Piscator; "for we taste meats for this reason, that, if they please us, we may eat them." From hence we may gather, that the Jews were wont to dine at mid-day, (which with them was the sixth hour,) and Josephus in his own life, says that this was the hour of their dinner on their sabbath. See before, ch. ii. 15. He fell into a trance. That is, he was entranced, or without himself, that he minded not what was done about him, neither had he any sense of any outward thing, but was wholly intent upon his internal ideas. " 'E^iorao-S'at in this place is," saith Price, (as saith Apuleius in his Apology,) "to be astonished even to the for- getfulness of things present, and the memory being by little and little removed from corporeal things, is made' intent upon that nature which is immortal and divine." Augustine says of his mother. Confess, ix. 5, she suffered a defection of mind, and for a time was estranged firom noticing things present. 11. And he saw heaven opened. That is, heaven seemed to him to be divided, as it were with a wide opening; and that way it opened, a covering, like a great sheet, did descend to him bound at four corners, hanging from heaven down to the earth. "But," , saith Grotius, " that sheet seemed to hang from heaven to signify our liberty indulged from heaven." See what have said before, ch. vii. 56. A certain vessel, as it had been a sheet. Greek, o-keuoc ti wq b^ovriv. " Although 1 am not ignorant," saith the most famous Ileinsius, "how large signification the ''h'3 of the Hebrews and the Vas of the Romans hath, yet I had rather in this place call it involucrum, a cloak, or something like it; ukvooq, wq 6^6vr\v, a VER. XII.J LITEUALLY EXPLAINED. 249 cloak, as it were a sheet, especially since o^ovii is' used by the Greeks for a cloak. Hesychius, the most learned of interpreters, 65i6vai, every thing that serveth to cover. It may be he alludes to the '^a of the Hebrew shepherds, which was either a cloak, or a satchel, in which they used to put their meat and cups, out of which they drank, and their other necessaries. Such a one is that of Zech. xi. 15, o-keDoc iroifiivog ait-dpov, the vessel of a foolish shepherd. Although there the Greeks render vessels in the plural number." Knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth. That is, being bound at the four corners to hang from heaven to earth. 12. Wlierein were. Not in reality, but in appearance, as says Cyril of Alexandria, lib. ix. against Julian. All. That is, all sorts. Four-footed beasts of the earth, and creeping things. Greek, " Four-footed beasts, and wild beasts, and creeping things." The word nlnn?, four-footed beasts, in the Vulgate Latin edition is taken in as large a sense here as amongst the naturalists. But in the Greek text it only comprehends domestic creatures, and which are wont to be kept for the common use of men, as camels, horses, asses, dogs, oxen, sheep, hogs, and others of that kind : and there- fore is added, and wild beasts. The Hebrew noun npna is taken foiur ways : first, for any brute creature, as when it is only opposed to man, as Ps. Ixxiii. 22. Whence it is, that the serpent is also ^.eckoned amongst the JTiana, Gen. iii. 14. Secondly, for any four-footed beast, somewhat big, which brings forth young ones alive, when it is opposed to birds, reptiles, and whatsoever liveth under the water. But wheresoever nara and n;n are opposed, as Gen. i. 25, then nana signifies beasts of burden, flocks, or any domestic cattle, and n;n wild cattle, whose other name Vl Ps. 1. 11, Ixxx. 14, seems to be taken from their motion. Because the Hebrew ri and Arabic hazaza, signifies " to move," or, " move one's self." For the tame and gentle animals have their pastures ascertained by their owners, and are fed at home : on the contrary, the wild cattle wander *about here and there for their food, and (as the philosopher says) Uke shepherds, are forced from place to place for their food. But it appears from 1 Sam. xvii. 44 ; Isa. xviii. 6 ; Jer. xxvii. 33, that wild beasts are also often compre- hended under nian:?. Moreover in Deut. xiv. 4, 5, stags, roes, buffaloes, &c., are reckoned amongst the species niaris which the 250 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY AVOSTLES [CHAP. X. law alloweth to be eaten. Lastly, in Job xl. 10, the noun nmrj^, a sea-horse, is of a plural termination, but singular sense. Creeping t.hing.i. A creeping creature, or reptile is called topTl, " from treading the ground," and S-ii|J, from plenty, and hn} from the slowness of its motion. The noun reptiles, Gen. ix. 3, and in other places is often taken for anything that treads. Sometimes it is opposed to four-footed beasts and birds, and so it includes fishes, as here, and Lev. xi. 46 ; Rom. i. 23. For a water-animal in the Hebrew phrase is called d':'?? niCOT n;ri, "a creature creeping in the waters." For although nnte), " to swim," is proper to water- creatures, whence they are called vtjkto, " swimmers," Wisd. xix. 18, yet the scripture says they creep in the waters, but never says they swim." " Everything that swims," saith Ambrose,' " has the figure, or nature, of a creeping thing, For although, when they have plunged themselves into the bottom, they seem to cleave the water, yet when they swim on the top, their whole body creeps, and is drawn over the uppermost parts of the water. Also amphibious creatures, which have feet and the use of going, yet when they are on the top of the waters, they do not walk, but swim ; neither use they the sole of the foot for treading, but as an oar for creeping. Lastly, in scripture every creature is said to be a reptile, which is neither a four-footed creature, somewhat big, nor a bird, nor a fish. So Moses places amongst reptiles the small four-footed creatures, as mice and moles. Lev. xi. 29, or all that are without blood, or creep upon their bellies, as worms, whether they fly, as, besides some locusts, flies, butterflies, &c., whether four-footed as locusts, or have many feet, as the worm scolopendra, Lev. xi. 42. Fowls of the air. That is, birds. " A bird," saith Bochartus, «' is a two-footed creature, winged and feathered. It diflfers much from a four-footed creature, having neither hairs, lipSj teeth, horns, nor fore-feet, but it hath ns:, ' feathers' for hairs, and "ipia, a 'beak' for lips and teeth, O":???, 'wings* for the fore-feet, and for horns some of them have n^?"i3 ' a comb.' Also birds want brows, eye- brows, nostrils, and ears. The owl and bustard have feathers for ears, the rest have holes. Inwardly they have neither reins nor bladder, and therefore their urine and dung are excerned at one passage. What in cattle is the nap, 'the maw,' Dent, xviii. 3, that in birds is nxna, ' a crop,' Lev. i. 16. There also rrSiJ, as some will ^ Hexaem, lib. v. cap. 1. VF.ll. XIV.J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 25 1 have it, is the belly of a bird, which the Hebrews in other places call 'm3, from Jer. li. 34. 1 3. ^nd there came a voice unto him. To wit, from heaven ; by which voice God purified those things which were before unclean, and abrogated the law which concerned the choice of living crea- tures, that he might withal inform him that no sort of people is forsaken of God. Kill, and eat. That is, kill all these, and without making any difference, eat of them all. As God, by this voice from heaven, did show that he gave the Jews converted to Christ, the liberty of eating of all sorts of meats; so it also signified that there was no reason to abstain from communion with strangers, after that through God's assistance, by their faith in Christ, they were purged from their idolatry, and evil manners, and had wholly devoted themselves to piety. For the pale, or the common wall of the ceremonial law, which forbade a closer communion betwixt the Jews and Gentiles,- being removed, there was no reason that souls joined by holiness to Christ and to God, should be any longer separated from one another. 14. Not so, &c.. Ezekiel, being commanded to taste an unclean thing, ch. iv. 14, gave a like answer. Daniel and his companions, Dan. i. 8, 12, chose rather to feed on pulse alone, than be defiled by the king's meat. Eleazer, 2 Mace. vi. 18, though they would have constrained him to eat swine's flesh, by forcing it into his mouth, chose rather to endure the greatest extremities, than in this respect obey the king. " Do not (says he in Josephus) esteem this a small sin, to eat defiled meat ; for the case is the same, whether thou transgress in great or small matters, for by both the law is alike despised." Seven brothers, with their mother, imitating Eleazer's constancy, having, for the same cause, suffered very much, ended their lives in martyrdom. These things are described, 2 Mace, vii., and in Josephus's book of the Maccabees. Common and unclean. That is, profane or impure. For when God had chosen the Jews for his own people, he prescribed them a form of livin.ff, which should distinguish them from the profane gentiles. Therefore whatsoever was in use among the gentiles against the rule of the law, was called common, or unclean ; for nothing was thought sanctified or pure, but what God had ordained for the use of his people. What God hath cleansed do not thou call common. As much as 252 THE ACTS OP THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. X. to say, Now when God has abolished and abrogated his laws con- cerning unclean meats, do not thou, out of a foolish scruple, abstain from any sort of meat, as if they were profane or impure. That this distinction of beasts into clean and unclean (used even before the flood. Gen. vii. 2) is by Christ taken away, is evident, not only by this voice to Peter, uttered from heaven, but from Matt. xv. 11; Eom. xiv. 14, &c. ; 1 Cor. x. 25—27 ; Col. ii. 16, 17, 20, 21 ; 1 Tim. iv. 4 ; Tit. i. 5. Therefore if any one does yet use this distinction of meats, as besides the Jews, the Arabians, and Maho- metans do, he limits himself by an idle scruple, nor uses that liberty which Christ by his death has procured us. The verb Npn, which is here translated koivovv, is properly "to pollute, improperly to esteem, or declare a thing polluted," as it is after expounded, ver. 28, Koivov rj uKa^aprov Xiyeiv, " to call a thing common or un- clean." 16. This was done thrice. To signify the immutableness of the divine purpose, which was to be thoroughly imprinted in his mind. And straight the vessel was received up into heaven. The sheet let down from heaven, represents the church culled by Heaven from among the Jews and Gentiles, made clean by faith, which in its spiritual birth, as it were, descends from heaven. Rev. iii. 12; xxi. 2. And as this sheet was taken up into heaven, so are they to return to heaven. 17. Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision, lohich he had seen, should mean. That is, while Peter was considering with himself what this vision sent him from heaven should signify. 19. The Spirit said unto him. That is, the Spirit commanded him. ipN, " he said," oftentimes with the Hebrews, but always with the Arabians, is as much as "to bid, to command." Such is that, Luke xii. 13, Speak to my brother, that he divide the inheritance with me; that is, command my brother to divide the inheritance betwixt us. 20. Doubting nothing. To go thither, where these men fetch thee, although he that sends for thee be not a Jew. For I have sent them. The Spirit is said to do that which he commanded by the angel before, ver. 5. " Hence," saith Calvin, " we are warned that the consciences of men cannot be assured that they do that which they do safely otherwise, than as being taught by the word of God, they propose to themselves to do nothing without his advice or command." VEP. XXIV.J LITEEALLY EXPLAIKED. 253 21. But Peter going down to the men. To wit, as is supplied in the Greek text, who were sent to him from Cornelius. 22. Of good report among all the nation of the Jews. That is, not only recommended by the praises of this or the other man, but of the whole Jewish nation. Solinus of Scipio Nasica: "He was adjudged a good man, not by a private testimony, but by the attestation of the whole senate." To hear words. That is, commands, or what he ought to do, as before, ver. 6, the angel spoke. So D^i^T " words," seventy inter- preters call IvToKaQ, " commands," Deut. xvii. 19; Jer. xix. 15, &c. 23. Some of the brethren. Peter pi-udently takes six of the brethren in his company, that they might be witnesses of what he did. See after, ch. xi. 12. 24. But on the morrow. That is, after Peter went from the city of Joppa. Having called, &c. Cornelius, like Rahab of Jericho, Josh. ii. 12, 13, studies not to keep the benefit of faith to himself, but desired that all his relations and kinsfolks might be made partakers of the same grace with him^ as who, he knew, might be compre- hended under the name of his family. His near friends. Vulgate, necessariis amicis. Gellius 13, Noct. Att. 3 : " Those who are conjoined by the law of affinity, and familiarity, are called necessarii festi." " Necessarii," as saith Gallus Elius, "are such who are either kinsfolks, or related by marriages, on whom, above others, friendly kindnesses are be- stowed." Nonius calls necessarii " allies," " Seeing that," says he, "necessitas is affinity, hence those that are allied by marriage, are called necessarii." But that not only allies, but kinsfolks are comprised under this name, is sufficiently manifest from this place of Valerius Maximus, lib. ii. c. 1. " Our ancestors did celebrate a solemn feast, and called it charistia, at which none were present but allies and kinsfolks ; that so, if any quarrel were betwixt those very near friends called necessarii, it might at this sacred feast be quite quashed by friendly peace-makers." Marcellus does dis- tinguish necessarii from friends and neighbours, as if they were bound together by a nearer tie of amity, lib. 4. Epist. Fam. to Cicero. "Amidst the great scarcity of friends, neighbours and intimates {ac necessariorum) who would sincerely have favoured my safety, I was very sensible of your great kindness and good- will towards me." 254 THE ACTS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES [cHAP. X. 25. And it came to pass that as Peter was coming in. Greek, "But as it happened that Peter entered." That is, when Peter was just now about to enter the house of Cornelius. " For," saith the most famous Beza, " these things w.ere not acted openly, but at Corne- lius's house, and that even at the threshold of his door, as appears from ver. 27, 28. 26. But Peter, &c. Peter does not admit of a religious reverence to be paid him as God's ambassador, as was in times past given to the prophets; because the Man Jesus Christ, the only Mediator betwixt God and men, is alone possessed of that embassy, and that authority joined to it; all others besides, in the matters of religion, are not lords or masters, but fellow servants and disciples. See Rev. xix. 10; xxii. 8, 9. 1 myself also am a man. That is, an earthly man, a -minister of that divine and heavenly Man, Christ Jesus, and thy fellow servant. 27. And as he talked with him. From the threshold of the house where he met him, into the house itself. 28. How that it is an unlawful thing. That is, it is thought an unlawful thing. To keep company, or come unto one of another nation. Seeing that the Jews could not altogether avoid converse and commerce with strangers, tliey oi'dered the matter so, that they neither went to their houses, nor ate with them. On this. account it was that Peter (ver. 21, 22) first speaks before the doors to the men sent by Cornelius, neither brought them into the house, until he was assured they were those of whom he had been warned by God; and, ch. xi. 3, Peter is accused by the Jews, that he had entered the houses of men uncircumcised, and eaten with them. And hence is that in Justin the historian about the Jews : " Because they remember they were driven from Egypt for fear of infection, lest they should for the same reason be hated by the natives, they cautiously avoided communicating with strangers: which at first happening for this reason, became by degrees a matter of discipline and religion." And Apollonius Molo says, " That they do not frequent the company of those who follow a course of life different from the Jews." " Which," saith most famous Selden, " Josephus plainly asserts to be true, whilst he largely defends the same thing from some of the Greek customs about strangers." But God hath sliewed me that I should not call any man common VEE. XXXIII.J LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 255 or unclean. That is, that for the futare no man should be reputed unclean, for being uncircumcised. 29. Without doubting I came. Greek, "I came without gainsay- ing." Calvin says excellently: "This is the holy silence of" faith, when without remonstrating with God, we quietly undertake what he commands, banishing far from us what contrary arguments may be suggested to us." 30. Four days ago to this hour. In the Greek is added, "I was fasting." The most learned Ludovicus de Dieu thinks that the present hour is meant, and that in the morning of that day. "For," saith he, " seeing that Joppa is nine miles, or a day's journey, from Csesarea, Peter set forth of Joppa on the day before, and the day after in the morning entered Caesarea, and discoursed with Corne- lius., 'It is four days to that very hour,' saith Cornelius, 'since I betook myself to fasting:' for I translate rjjujjv vijarfuwv, 'I was fasting,' not, 'I fasted.'" At the ninth hour I was praying. Greek, "And at the ninth hour," to wit, of that day, on which I betook myself to fasting, ' praying.' And behold. When I was very earnest at prayer, and my mind was free from all disturbances, which things are wont to make us more obnoxious to phantasms and visions. A man. That is, an angel in the shape of a man. So Moses promiscuously sometimes calls them men, sometimes angels, whom Abraham saw in human shape. In bright clothing. "A bright garment," saith Calvin, "was a mark of celestial glory, and as it were a badge of that Divine majesty, with which an angel ought to shine. The evangelists tell us that Christ's garments had such a brightness, wlien he showed his glory to the three disciples in the mount. And they tell the same of the angels, when they were sent to attest Christ's resurrection. For as hitherto God has designed to suit our in- firmities, and commanded his angels to come down in our fleshly shape ; so he allows them some rays of his glory, to make the commands he sends by them reverenced and believed. 31. Heard. See our notes on ver. 4. 33, Thou hast well done that thou art come. That is, thou hast done very commendably in coming. See a like phrase of praising, 2 Pet. i. 19. In thy sight. 'EvwTrtov aov, so the Syriao and Arabian reads it, whereas the vulgar Greek editions have it, ivwwiov tov Snov, "in 256 THE ACTS Oi' THE HOLY APOSTLES [oHAf . X." the sight -of Grod." That is, having God before our eyes, whom it is not lawful to mock by dissimulation. To hear all things, &c. Cornelius prudently distinguishes betwixt God and man, for he makes God the author of the commandments, but allows man no more but the ministry and embassy. "Thou shalt find us," saith he, "attentive and obedient disciples to all those things God has commanded us by thee : so that he alone shall have the command, thou shalt be only his minister: he alone shall speak, but from thy month." And God prescribes this to all his servants, in the person of Ezekiel, Ezek. xxxiii. 7: And thou, son of man, I have set thee a watchman unto the house of Israel : therefore thou shalt hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from, vie. 34. But Peter opening his mouth. It is an emphatical phrase, which is wont to be used, when one, after a long' silence, begins to speak, as Job. iii. 1; and of any matter of singular moment, as Psa. Ixxviii. 2; Prov. viii. 6; Matt. v. 2; xiii. 35; and that with an eager vehemence, with an ardour and emotion both of mind and voice, as Judg. xi. 35 ; Job xxxiii. 2 ; Psa. xlix. 4. Thus the apostle would have the Ephesians by prayer to entreat God, that utterance might be given him, that he might open his mouth, Eph. vi. 19, where the words iv avol%u tov arofxaTog, by way of explication, are expounded in the following phrase, Iv wappriaiq, with boldness. Of a truth I perceive. That is, what before, being prejudiced, I did not understand. "'Ett' oXri^daQ KaToXafi^avofiai," saith Heinsius, "he may say, who being really persuaded, is forced to change his opinion. Peter was persuaded that it was unlawful for a Jew to converse with Gentiles ; although the Lord in that vision, which is mentioned ver. 11, and afterwards, endeavoured to make him forsake this opinion. Now, being by Cornelius's example, more fully convinced that that was true which was' enigmatically by a vision signified to him, he says that he is £Tr' aXrj^ei'ae KaraXajuj3av£(TSa(, which is, ' conquered by truth,' or ' compelled by the truth to change his opinion.' " God is no respecter of persons. That is, there is no man whom God respects for those prerogatives, which may be common as well to the bad as good. " It is to be observed," saith Estius, on Eom. ii. 11, "that this phrase, by which any one is said to be a respecter of persons, which indeed is peculiar to the holy writ, is derived VER. XXXV.] LITERALLY EXPLAINED. 257 from the Hebrews, by whom they are said to take, or accept a man's countenance, or to look upon a man's countenance, who, for some quality they see or know in him, as for his power, riches, nobility, kinship, do so reverence and love him, that for his sake they deviate from truth, justice, and right. Hence is that reviling of the judges, Psa. Ixxxii, 2: How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked? Hence the Pharisees and the Herodians, deceitfully endeavouring to entrap Christ, said, (Matt. xii. 16; Mark xii. 14,) We know that thou regardest not the persons of men, but teachest the way of God in truth. For this reason justice is painted blind, because it respects not the faces of men. But because the Greek word 7rpo