THE FREEMAN PAMPHLETS THE ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD With an introduction by the Editor Katharine Anthony NEW YORK B. W, HUEBSCH. Inc. MCMXX 50c. Butt ^allege of JVgttculttice At Clocnell 3iIntuerBitg THE ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924013933563 THE ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD WITH A PREFACE BY THE EDITOR KATHARINE ANTHONY NEW YORK, MCMXX B. W. HUEBSCH, INC. COPYRIGHT, 1920, BY B. W. HUEBSCH, Inc. The following are responsible for the preparation of this book: K. D. COURTNEY. H. N. BRAILSFORD. ELEANOR F. RATHBONE, A. MAUDE ROYDEN. MARY STOCKS. ELINOR BURNS. EMILE BURNS. Note: — The members of the Family Endowment Committee are technicians and experts. Eleanor F. Rath- bone is Secretary of the Liverpool Women's Industrial ijCouncil and author of studies on " Conditions among the ' Dock Laborers," " The Problem of Women's Wages," and " Widows under the Poor Law." Maude Royden is assistant preacher in the City Temple of London, an ex- Tecutive in suffrage organizations, and the author of " Women and the Sovereign State." H. N. Brailsford is ithe author of economic and political works, " The War of Steel and Gold," " The League of Nations," " The Cove- nant of Peace," etc. Emile Burns is joint author of ;"The Idea of Public Right." Elinor Bums is a joint author of "The Making of Women: Oxford Essays in Feminism." Mary Stocks is a well-known economist and writer, chiefly on consumers' problems, for the British Economic Journal and other periodicals. The Chairman of the Committee, Miss Kathleen D. Courtney, was for- merly the Secretary of the British National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies. Recently she has filled ex- ecutive positions in connection with feminist reforms growing out of the adoption of the suffrage measure. PREFACE When Elizabeth Barrett Browning's baby was born, she received a maternity endowment of a hundred pounds a year. It was the gift of a well- disposed cousin, an elderly bachelor. Though the Brownings were far from poor, the settle- ment was welcomed, no doubt, as meeting a rea- sonable need. Certainly it seems only fitting that a well-to-do bachelor should play the part of an economic " uncle " to the next generation. The generosity of childless people toward the children of near relatives and favorite friends strikes one as mere justice and propriety, after all, and such voluntary acts of evening-up between one genera- tion and the next are not at all uncommon among the families and classes who can afford to be kind. It is a commonplace among the rich that chil- dren increase expenses. But families who sub- sist on wages and salaries have no margin, or practically none, on which to draw in this emer- gency. For, though the birth of children is one of the most familiar facts in nature, it still figures as an emergency in family life and as a shock to the family budget. The children of wage-earners regularly subtract from the standard of comfort in the home. They derive their sole income from vi PREFACE the self-denial of the parents. This has been proved over and over by statistical experts and government investigators of the cost of living. Under the existing wage-system, which makes no distinction between the married man and the bachelor, the needs of children are met by the sacrifices of the parents. The familiar argument that men are paid more than women because men have families to support is considerably weak- ened by the fact that unmarried men are paid the same as married men and the father of one child, the same as the father of ten. Every intelligent person knows the facts; yet the knowledge is counteracted by an emotional prejudice, amounting almost to a superstition, which tends to block all social reforms that would lighten the individual parent's burden. Parent- age should be, as it is, a supremely chastening experience. Any effort to mitigate the punish- ment is " spoiling." Once I heard a parish priest denounce a neighboring day-nursery, which took care of some laundry workers' children, as a de- vice for " coddling " the mothers. If we went far enough back in history, we should find the prototype of this stern man, in all probability, opposing the public school as a device for " cod- dling " parents and an incentive to over-breeding. But nowadays no one thinks of questioning the " funds to parents " which are dispensed in the form of a public school budget. At some time PREFACE vii in the future, it will seem amazing to ordinary- people that children under six were not consid- ered by the community as having any claim on the taxes. At present, the case for child welfare rests in this stage : Let the individual parent take all the consequences of his parentage until the public school steps in at a comparatively advanced stage of the child's development. If the individ- ual infant can survive the ordeal of dependancy on a low-paid father, the public school will then educate him and even take a certain amount of interest in his health. Unfortunately, the aver- age infant, at least up until his second summer, is not ambitious for the intellectual benefits of a public school. He craves material things like sun- shine, fresh air, and milk, and emotional things, like an individual mother's attention; and, if he does not get these things, he is prone to give up the struggle altogether. The behavior of such unsatisfied infants is strikingly recorded in the vital statistics of every country. Many economists and sociologists would like to encourage these non-resistant babies to take a stronger hold on life by increasing the father's wages. For we know that infant mortality goes up as the father's wages go down. Yet it is not solely a question of sufficient income, but also of incidence of income. Some of those who are most zealous for the betterment of the family income are perfectly content that the father shall viii PREFACE control it absolutely. They feel that the unity of the family is inseparably bound up with mascu- line hegemony. They maintain, — and with some truth, — that the wife can usually trust her hus- band to hand over to her a due proportion of his earnings for herself and the children. A married man is the most suggestible of animals ; he usually does what society expects of him. When one considers the awful load which he bears as the sole support of a numerous family and recalls the curious fact that he would be worth just as much if he were wifeless and childless, one can only wonder that so few, rather than so many, married men desert. On the other hand, a man is bound to feel that the money he has earned is his own. And, what is more to the point, his wife is bound to feel the same. The mother and her children are depend- ent, not only on the amount of the man's wages, but also on his indulgence, his fairness, or his selfishness. Such a relationship generates a sense of inferiority which is just as painful to a woman as to a man and which she will make just as great sacrifices to avoid. Society tells her that she will have to put up with it, because motherhood is a " handicap." But slowly, very slowly, women have learned to question this dictum. Whence comes this social opinion, they ask, which calls the most normal function of a woman's life and an essential service to Society a " handicap " ? It PREFACE ix comes, of course, from beings for whom child- bearing is not a normal function and who are in- capacitated by nature for the performance of this service to Society. Men once instituted the " couvade " in an attempt to imitate the child- bearer; but when they found that they still re- mained sterile, they decided to invent the " handi- cap of motherhood." This might not be so bad if it had not been accompanied by the stern reality of economic de- pendence. England has recently had a practical demonstration of the poor results of the latter. The separation allowances paid to the soldiers' wives improved the standard of living. The women made excellent custodians of the family income. English homes and English children actually showed improvement on an allowance which was usually about five dollars a week for the family. It was a grave commentary on the former state of affairs. There is little doubt that, if money intended for the maintenance of young children were given directly to the mother instead of being sifted first through the father's hands, more of it would reach its proper destina- tion. As it is now, the upkeep of the children comes out of the mother chiefly. One does not need to be a feminist to believe this. The United States Commissioner of Labor Statistics says, " It is extremely interesting to study the changes in the percentage distribution of expenditures with X PREFACE changes in the size of the family. They show the influence of the babies upon expenditures. A wife, when she first marries, according to the tabulations worked out, spends about as much for clothes as the husband, in the workingraan's fam- ily. Some of you may be surprised to hear that the woman spends almost as much as the man. The accepted notion is quite to the contrary. But just as soon as the first baby comes, her expendi- ture for clothes drops. When the next baby comes, it drops again; so eventually the wife be- comes absolutely — I do not like to say it but I do not know of any other terms in which to ex- press it — a domestic slave." The general fall in the birthrate is a matter of deep concern throughout the civilized world. Statesmen are beginning to declare that the eco- nomic difficulties will have to be abated. The old-fashioned husband, who once carried on his solitary back an unrestricted family of children, can no longer accomplish the feat. Long ago, the European governments found it necessary to offer a helping hand to the extent of a small maternity insurance grant to working class mothers. But this is no longer adequate, and further economic measures tending toward the endowment of motherhood are now being pro- posed by important groups of reformers, like the authors of the following pamphlet. PREFACE xi They conclude that the State will have to deal increasingly with the mother directly and less through the agency of the father as a middle- man. They advance the proposition that the services of the mother in the home are worth a remuneration from the State ; it should not be paid as a pension or bounty. And they argue, further- more, that the economic independence of mothers is a thing to be striven for throughout all income- classes. For this reason, their views should be equally interesting to the wives of professors, of Plumb Planners, and Pittsburg day laborers. When we come to the cost of the scheme and the budget proposed, American readers will Inevitably be disappointed in the small stipends named. The sum of five shillings a week would scarcely pay the milk bill of a New York child. Of course these sums are inadequate even under English standards. But if mothers are going to get on the pay roll of Society at all, they will have to be willing to begin at the bottom. It is a great advance to have the principle established that motherhood should be entitled to any pay at all. Incidentally the English government has already found it necessary to increase the military pen- sions, from which the budgets in the following pamphlet were originally derived. Such readjust- ments are now more common than once. At the present. time, a bill for civilian widows' pensions lies before the British Parliament, — a xli PREFACE challenge from the new women voters of the coun- try. Since the English franchise law gave the vote to the married women and withheld it from the unmarried women under thirty, the govern- ment is now confronted by the logical conse- quences of this action. Among the feminist re- forms demanded, those which affect wives and mothers will now naturally take the priority. If the arbitrary limitation of the franchise results in giving the mothers a chance to assert their claims effectively, no modern feminist will have any cause to complain. It is high time that the endowment of motherhood should be classed among the realizable ideals of practical politics. Katharine Anthony. CONTENTS Introduction, i Report of the Family Endowment Committee, 8 I. General Aims of the Scheme of Endowment, 9 II. Consideration of Possible Objections, 21 III. Principles of a Concrete Scheme, 33 IV. The Scheme Proposed, 39 V. The Cost, 42 VI. Administration, 47 The Treatment of the Unmarried Mother and Her Children, 53 Endowment and the Family Income: A Flat- Rate of Endowment or a Scale Graded in Ac- cordance with Income? 63 INTRODUCTION The women 'bus conductors of London who struck for " equal pay " made a brilliant and suc- cessful fight, but they have also raised a far-reach- ing problem. In the immediate foreground of industrial politics it would be hard to exaggerate the importance of their bold stroke for simple justice. What is conceded to 'bus conductors cannot In the long run be denied to railway workers, and what is granted in the transport trades will presently be demanded in every branch of industry. Principles are a dangerous form of social dynamite, and this particular explosive will shatter many things before its force is ex- hausted. For " equal pay for equal work " is only one half of women's demand. The other half is to win admission (wherever the work is suitable) to an equal place, when their skill merits it, among the craftsmen of the better organized unions. To tell a woman that she shall have equal pay, whenever she is allowed to do a man's work, is a mockery if at the same time the doors of all the upper rooms In the house of Industry are closed against her. Her battle is only beginning, 2 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD so long as all the more exclusive crafts, from barristers ^ to compositors, refuse to admit her to their privileges. To pretend that the reluctance of these highly- skilled, well-organized crafts is due to mere sex- selfishness is to miss the central issue of the prob- , lem. It is true that women have had to battle, and must still battle, at every stage of their long, struggle for education, political rights, and eco- nomic opportunity, against the crude egoism of men who opposed their every striving to emerge from the position of the unpaid, untaught do- mestic drudge. They have owed their escape from this position more often to their own ef- forts and to the commercial egoism of men who brought them into industry to exploit them than to the chivalry of men who smoothed the way for them as comrades. None the less, there is a reason — in its way a natural reason — for the opposition of men to the entry of women into industry. That reason is expressed in the fa- miliar phrase that " men have families to keep." The present organization of society throws the main cost of rearing the next generation upon the shoulders of men, and public opinion's rough sense of justice will not admit that a single woman ought to have as much money as a family of 1 since this was written, a bill has been passed by the British Parliament which opens to women all branches of the legal and other professions. — Ed. INTRODUCTION 3 three, five, or (it may be) six or seven mouths. And yet the. 'bus men of London gave unstint- ing help to the women in their fight for " equal pay." Organized labor has declared emphat- ically its intention to enforce the application of that principle throughout the country. Although the fear of women's competition at lower rates is an important motive in the men's policy, this motive does not explain the general sympathy of the public which so largely con- tributed to the women's success. The Press sup- ported the women's demand almost as unani- mously as it supported the demands of the Lon- don police a week later. Public opinion's rough sense of justice admits that women should not be paid less than men for the same work. The possession of the vote strengthens the women's insistence on their industrial rights, and gives force to a movement that will not stop be- fore it has swept away the barriers of the past and won for women their right place in the social as well as in the industrial organization of so- ciety. Foremost among the barriers to equality is the system which ignores the mother's service to So- ciety in making a home and rearing children. The mother is still the unchartered servant of the future, who receives from her husband, at his discretion, a share in his wages. The system 4 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD may work, on the average, fairly well. But even if, as is probable, the husband behaves well and " brings home " the bulk of his earnings, these earnings do not vary with his family needs, and are subject to the arbitrary chances of unemploy- ment and ill-health. Such are the causes, apart from the instances of selfish and thriftless conduct on the husband's part, which tend to drive the wife herself into the labor market, to the detri- ment of the home and the children. She will work in such cases for less than a subsistence wage, and she thereby lowers the standard of women's wages. At its best the system leaves the woman with less self-respect and independ- ence than she ought to have. At its worst it re- sults in neglected homes and ill-nourished chil- dren. It provides less than a decent standard of life for the unskilled laborer's family, and forces the older children into the labor market at an unripe age. Erected into a custom and a con- vention, this system tends to keep women's wages low, even when they are wholly or partially sup- porting a family. It works with peculiar cruelty towards a wife who, after bearing children, finds herself wronged, ill-used, or neglected. Even in the most fortunate cases, the system recognizes neither the personality of the woman nor her contribution to society. There can be no real independence, whether for man or woman, INTRODUCTION 5 without economic independence. Few of us realize how constantly and subtly this half-con- scious, but ever-present sense of the economic dependence of the woman upon the man corrodes her personality, checks her development, and stunts her mind, even while she is still a girl, with marriage only as yet in prospect. Social injustice is a continuous poison, administered without our knowledge in daily doses, but it makes spiritual dwarfs of those who might be giants. The industrial program of " equal pay for equal work " is no remedy for these difficulties. It raises in an acute form the problems connected with the rearing of the next generation. Relying on that formula alone, women may win an empty victory, and rivet more firmly the fetters which bound them in the past to the low-paid, unskilled trades. Relying on that formula alone, women may check the course of their own social emanci- pation. That course is not to be measured solely in industrial and political terms. The " separa- tion allowance " to the soldier's wife has made her for the first time the mistress of a personal income, with the result that multitudes of homes have been better furnished and multitudes of children better nourished than they were in peace. The allowance to the mother recognizes her per- sonality and the importance of her work; the additional grant for every child does accurately 6 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD what' the conventional " family " wage, paid to the man, does at best approximately. The amount of the family income varies with the need, as wages do not. A new and just system of pro- viding for the rearing of the next generation has been unwittingly demonstrated by the British Government. The continuation and extension of this system would be a national recognition of the mother's work; and at the same time it would safeguard the coming generation from the aggravated in- justice which threatens it as the result of the rise in prices and the disorganization of industry. It would also solve the otherwise insoluble contra- diction between the claims of the family and the principle of " equal pay for equal work." For years pioneer women have advocated the endow- ment of motherhood, as much for the sake of the mother's self-respect as for the child's welfare. To-day the logic of experience has reenforced the arguments of the past, and the united labor de- mand for " equal pay " has made the endowment of motherhood the most urgent question of the hour. In the following pages the subject is carefully examined in its many bearings on the industrial, social and economic life of the country. It is an issue that cannot be burked in the period of reconstruction, and the definite proposals here INTRODUCTION 7 made form the first practical scheme for the na- tional endowment of motherhood. The scheme promises a measure of economic independence to the mother, and recognizes by a direct payment her services to society. It recog- nizes the varying needs of the family with an exactness impossible to wages. It recognizes the readjustment of the organization of society which the irresistible demand of " equal pay for equal work " will involve. In its full application, the scheme will make it easy to decrease juvenile em- ployment, and to raise the school age, since the child's wage will no longer be a necessary supple- ment to the father's. It means, in short, an ap- proach to the humane maxim, " To each accord- ing to his need " ; the abolition of hunger for the child; the economic and social emancipation of women; the safeguarding of men from the perils of low-paid competition; and such a level- ing up of opportunities as our race has never known in all its history. It makes a ringing call to the ambition and vision of both men and women voters. REPORT OF THE FAMILY ENDOWMENT COMMITTEE At the suggestion of Miss E. F. Rathbone a small Committee was formed in October, 19 17, to discuss the establishment of a national scheme of family endowment on the lines of separation allowances, which have greatly benefited the coun- try during the war by distributing the means of subsistence according to the number of persons in the family concerned. The Committee has had under consideration a number of questions to which the war gave special prominence, and which will be increasingly important in the long period of reconstruction. Many of these questions are directly connected with the development of national life through the adequate maintenance and care of children; others, although not directly connected with this, are yet so closely related that they cannot be treated separately. The Committee has come to the conclusion that a national scheme of family endowment is the only practicable method of meeting the prob- lems ^hich it has considered. This should take REPORT OF COMMITTEE 9 the form of a weekly allowance, sufficient in amount to cover the primary cost of physical subsistence, paid direct to the mother for herself and for each of her children, throughout the period when the care of the children necessarily occupies her whole attention. The details have not yet been fully developed, but the Committee has thought it desirable to draw up a statement of the general lines of the proposed scheme, with the reasons which have prompted its conclusions. It is convenient to divide this report into six parts : 1. The general aims of the scheme. 2. Consideration of possible objections to the scheme. 3. The principles of a concrete scheme. 4. The scheme proposed. 5. The cost. 6. Administration. I. — The General Aims of the Scheme (a) The Provision made by Society for its own Continuation. An Important aspect of the present wages sys- tem is that the nation provides for its own con- tinuation — for the rearing of future citizens — through the wages of Individual adults. It Is obvious that children until they reach an age when lo ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD they can become producers; mothers during the time when their work in bearing and rearing chil- dren removes them from the ranks of ordinary producers; as well as old or disabled men or women — must be a charge on the products of the country's industry. The system that left the burden of non-producers to be borne by individ- uals has been formally broken down in England by free Education, Old A'ge Pensions and the Insurance Acts; but no attempt has been made to shift the main burden of children's non-pro- ductive Hfe from the individual to the commu- nity. It is a commonplace that the system of provid- ing for the next gen.eration through wages is wasteful and inadequate. Wages cannot be ad- justed to meet family needs ; the unmarried earner receives the same wages as the father of one child or of ten children. The amount of food and other necessaries which each child can be given depends on (a) the wages of the father, (b) the number of other children in the family — two totally irrelevant factors. No Food Con- troller would dream of distributing an equal ra- tion of bread to each household, without taking into account the number of mouths that had to be fed. Yet this is, in effect, the plan adopted, so long as the family with children receives the same income as the single man. It is essential REPORT OF COMMITTEE ii that a new system should be introduced which would give to the family with children an amount — over and above the wages earned by the father — based on the actual number of children in that family. (b) The Remuneration of Women's Services. This conclusion is also supported by considera- tions bearing on the employment of women. The large increase in the number of women in industry during the war, and the increasing need for the full utilization of the country's labor resources will tend to raise in a much more acute form the difficulties which the employment of women in competition with men has raised in the past. These difficulties are closely connected with the present system of providing for the next genera- tion. The fact that the majority of male wage- earners either have to maintain a family or are young men who expect to do so shortly, while the majority of women wage-earners work for their own subsistence or are only partly respon- sible for the maintenance of others, has led to a general acceptance of lower standards of pay for women than men, even when they do the same work. The result is that men, with some justice, look on women workers as blacklegs, and resist their admission into the higher paid and more skilled branches of industry. In the past this re- 12 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD sistance, combined with other causes connected with the traditional attitude to women, has been largely successful in confining women to a group of trades, concerned with the domestic arts and so recognized as their own, and to the least skilled branches of men's trades. The discovery during the war of the potentiali- ties of women in industry has to a great extent broken down this barrier, and it is clear that in the future the industrial competition between the sexes is likely to be much keener than before and, unless some means of adjustment can be found, may constitute a most serious menace to the men's standards of life. On the other hand, any at- tempt to prevent women from exercising their newly-found powers and to force them back be- hind the traditional boundaries is certain to be resisted both by employers and by women them- selves, as involving a great waste of human ca- pacity. This is becoming widely recognized by the workers themselves. The better organized groups of women are everywhere raising the cry of " equal wages for equal work," and at the British Labour Party Conference, on July 28th, 1918, a resolution was passed "That the prin- ciple of ' equal pay for similar duties ' should be everywhere adopted." It will, however, be ex- ceedingly difficult to secure the universal adoption REPORT OF COMMITTEE 13 of this obviously just principle so long as the equally just objection can be raised that men need higher pay, not because their need of beer and cigarettes is greater, but because they have to support their wives and children. Mr. Seebohm Rowntree feels this difficulty so strongly that, in " The Human Needs of Labor," he actually proposes a differentiation of 19s. ($4-75) per week in the suggested minimum wage for men and for women. Unjust as this differentiation would be felt to be by women, and disastrous as it must be in its effects on men's wages and employment, it must be recognized that the grounds advanced by Mr. Rowntree for this proposed differentiation will be accepted by the general public, so long as the burden of providing for the next generation falls almost entirely upon the wages of individual men. Although in strongly organized trades the efforts of women workers and the support of men workers may win here and there a victory for the principle of " equal pay," it must be recognized that as long as the argument that " men have families to keep " can be brought against them, they are swimming against a strong tide of public opinion, and that this opinion Is shared not only by the employing class but by employed men and their wives as well. When the national endowment of mothers and 14 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD children becomes an accomplished fact, this excuse for the underpayment of women will no longer hold good and women will be free to claim — and men to concede to them — whatever position in industry their faculties fit them for, at a wage based on the work they do, and not on their sup- posed necessities. Until that time comes, the em- ployment of women will remain one of the most serious problems in the country's industrial de- velopment, and in the development of that com- munity of interests between men and women to which the country looks forward with increasing hope. (c) The Health of Children. It is now generally realized that Great Britain suffers every year a serious loss, which to a great extent is preventable, in the death of rather more than ten per cent, of the children under one year old. It is also realized that numbers even of the children who survive grow up with physical and mental disabilities which prevent their taking any very active part in the industrial system. It is realized that the main cause of the infant mortality and the crippling of a large proportion of the survivors is the lack of proper nourish- ment, which accentuates the evils of bad housing, inadequate care, and disease. In his Report for 19 1 6, Sir Geoi'ge Newman says (p. 139) : REPORT OF COMMITTEE 15 " Speaking generally, the findings of medical inspection have demonstrated that something like ten per cent, of the total number of chil- dren in attendance at Public Elementary Schools are suffering from a recognizable de- gree of malnutrition (say 600,000 children). ... It is not only a question of a hungry child, but of a child physically below par, and thus unable to derive full benefit from its school- ing." This process of under-nourishment frequently be- gins before birth, and its effects, visible to school medical inspectors, reach their climax in the indus- trial and social fate of the many grades of the inefficient. The provision of milk and school meals can be only palliatives. They will affect only a small part of the total number of children, and they will leave untouched the health of the mother and the general standard of living in the home. In the actual working of the separation allow- ances which have been paid during the war we find a possible solution. Apart from isolated cases, the health and standard of living of chil- dren in the homes which have benefited by sepa- ration allowances have been greatly improved. The mothers who have drawn these allowances during the war have shown themselves to be 1 6 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD capable of doing their work — the rearing of children — efficiently, if adequate means are placed at their disposal. In the report referred to above, Sir George Newman says (p. 142) : — " The evidence from school doctors and the Board's medical inspectors in all parts of the country is to the effect that in 19 16 the children were, on the whole, better fed and better clothed than at any time since medical inspec- tion was introduced." {d) The Removal of Economic Restrictions on Parenthood. The conditions referred to above suggest that, as long as the maintenance of families is provided for through the wages of individuals, the more industrious and ambitious classes of workers will tend, as their standard of living is raised, to restrict their families, as well as to defer mar- riage in order to make sure of adequate incomes. The war has intensified the decline in the birth rate; and there can be no doubt that the present economic situation will increase the tendency to restriction. This tendency will be specially strong among those ambitious workers whose high standards of living would ensure the survival and the proper care of their children; but it will affect much wider classes than it has affected in the past, since knowledge of the means of restrict- REPORT OF COMMITTEE 17 ing families is now almost universal. As long as wages fix the limits of the family standard of liv- ing, each additional child must lower the stand- ard in that family; and the system must be al- tered if we wish to counteract the economic tend- ency to restriction among just those types of citizens whose increase is of most importance to the national life. Unless the system is altered the nation will continue to be recruited, in an ever growing proportion, from the ranks of those who are physically and mentally the least fit. (See also II. (d), page 29.) (e) Improvement in the Status of Women. The alternatives open to women in the past have been either dependence as a mother or inde- pendence as an industrial worker. During the war, the payment of separation allowances made it possible for a great many mothers to give proper time and attention to the care of their children, and at the same time to enjoy economic independence. In the present period of readjust- ment when much depends on the care given to the rearing of children, the mother's work must be recognized as an important service to the country, and those who render it should not be placed in a condition economically inferior to that of the in- dependent wage-earning woman. In the present scheme of society, not only does 1 8 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD the mother's continuous and exhausting work fail to bring her economic independence; circum- stances over which she has no control often de- prive her of the- means which she requires to enable her to do her work properly. If the coun- try wishes to give some practical proof of its respect for motherhood, it must secure to the mother, in the first place, a measure of economic independence for herself; and, secondly, an addi- tional allowance, based on the number of her chil- dren, which will make it possible for her, without continuous privation on her part, to feed, clothe, and care for them adequately. If the mother leaves her home, and goes out as nurse, cook, general servant or housekeeper to some other family, she is paid for that work, a decent stand- ard of living is assured to her, and she is given the materials she needs in the course of her duties ; but if she stays at home and looks after her own children she receives no payment, and her stand- ard of living and the materials she needs for her work are both dependent on her husband's earnings — not on the value of her own work, or on the number of children for whom she has to provide. Hence it is that motherhood — which has often been called the noblest of all professions — too often means a life of overwork rewarded by continuous privation and anxiety about making both ends meet The first step REPORT OF COMMITTEE 19 towards raising the status of women must be the raising of the status of motherhood, and the blotting out in " the noblest of all professions " of those conditions which could not bear com- parison with the worst conditions of sweated in- dustrial employment. (/) The Redistribution of Wealth. It is generally admitted that constant efforts must be made to aboHsh some of the most glar- ing evils in the present distribution of wealth. In the summer of 19 16, Mr. Asquith said that the Government was anxiously considering means to secure " a fairer distribution." The evil is generally thought of in terms of individual wage- earners; and a remedy is sought in trade-boards and wages legislation. But it is clear from the foregoing that a most serious evil, which con- stantly retards national development, is the un- fairness of the distribution among families. This point is not dependent on any " Socialist " views of class justice; within any one class, the exist- ing distribution is unjust as between families — unju'st in the special sense that it penalizes those individuals whose services to the State should be recognized and encouraged. It has been a com- monplace among sociological writers that the unit of the State is the family; the unit in the distri- bution of wealth is, however, not the family, but 20 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD the individual wage-earner. Hence any attempt at redistribution through wages, however far- reaching, will not produce that redistribution which is most important to the national life. In State payments according to family needs we find the only means' — a means which can be directly effected by legislation — of securing " a fairer distribution " on which all classes would be in agreement. (g) A Higher Standard of Living. There can be no doubt of the existence of an irresistible demand for a general improvement in the standard of living. If this demand is con- ceded solely through wages, the rise in prices would probably outstrip the rise in wages among the weaker and less organized sections of workers. If, on the other hand, the demand for a higher standard of living were met also by direct State payments according to family needs, a higher standard of living would at a stroke be made possible for mothers and children in all classes of workers without distinction, and this in its turn would stimulate production. In periods of slack trade and unemployment, again, the slackness in demand is accentuated, and a permanent mark left on the nation's vi- tality, by the fact that the family consumption is reduced when the wage-earner is unemployed. REPORT OF COMMITTEE 21 A constant volume of demand based on the fam- ily income received from the State would reduce fluctuations in the general demand and so tend to reduce unemployment. II. — Consideration of Possible Objections TO THE Scheme (a) The Danger to Wages. The effect which family endowment would have on wages is a matter of fundamental importance. It may be argued that wages must inevitably fall if part of the. costs of subsistence are met by direct State payments. But whatever the gen- eral merits of this argument may be, we do not believe that the adoption of the particular scheme of family endowment which we suggest would have any such inevitable adverse effect on wages. In the first place, endowment on the lines pro- posed below would only benefit families with chil- dren under five years old; so that the class draw- ing benefits at any one time would be relatively small. The number of families in the United Kingdom with one or more children under five is estimated at 2,655,000; the number of occu- pied males in 19 II was about 11,500,000. Thus the two-and-a-half million workers whose homes are benefiting by endowment will be scattered through all industries, and trade union solidarity 2 2 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD will prevent them from acting as blackleg labor; while the remaining three-quarters of the men in each industry will be getting no benefit from the scheme of endowment, and their attitude on wages questions will only be strengthened by the general raising of the standard of living which endow- ment will produce. Nor can the fact be ignored that the scheme of endowment will mean that, whether the fathers are employed or not, the fam- ilies in which there are young children will be certain of at least physical subsistence. That is to say, in the event of wages disputes the workers will know that a large number of their dependants are secure, and that the call on strike funds will be less. In well-organized trades, ther-efore, there is little danger that endowment would weaken the workers' attitude on wages questions; while it is certain that it would considerably strengthen their power of resistance in industrial conflicts. It cannot of course be doubted that the em- ployer's natural reluctance to grant increases in wages will be stiffened by the introduction of the endowment scheme. He will not only feel that there is less justification on humanitarian grounds for increases in wages; his active resistance will also be strengthened by the increased burden of taxation which the scheme involves. REPORT OF COMMITTEE 23 But, whatever, in these circumstances, the rela- tive bargaining powers of the workers and em- ployers may be, no one will doubt that it will be an immense improvement in the social system if families with young children are secured from the worst effects of industrial conflicts, and it is prob- able that this certain result of endowment will be as welcome to the average employer as to the workers themselves. This result will follow in weakly organized as well as in highly organized trades. But where there is not a strong trade union organization the increased reluctance of the employer to grant in- creases in wages may be too strong for the workers; and in such trades there may even be, at first, a tendency for the workers whose families are drawing endowment to accept lower wages. Although, for the reasons advanced in the follow- ing paragraphs, we believe that this tendency would soon be checked, there is no doubt that the establishment of a national minimum wage at the same time as the introduction of the Family En- dowment scheme would greatly safeguard the po- sition of the workers. The costs of subsistence are undoubtedly an important factor in influencing the workers' atti- tude on wages questions, especially where wages are but little above subsistence level. But other 24 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD and probably more important factors which ac- tually determine rates of wages are : (a) The aggregate amount of national pro- duction. (b) The number and bargaining power of the workers among whom labor's share has to be divided, as compared with the amount of available capital and the bargaining power of its owners. We must therefore consider not merely the effect of family endowment upon the workers' subsis- tence costs, but also its effect upon (a) the effi- ciency of labor; (b) the bargaining power of labor; (c) the number of wage-earners compet- ing in the labor market. An exhaustive treat- ment of these obscure questions is of course out- side the scope of the present memorandum; but the following general considerations may be ad- vanced. As regards the efficiency of labor, it may be urged that the mere physical health which en- dowment would bring to the workers in their earlier years would create a more vigorous and self-reliant body of citizens, whose increased pro- ductivity would be of such benefit to the country's industry that it would be well able to bear any increased wages which they might demand. REPORT OF COMMITTEE 25 With regard to the bargaining power of labor, reference has been made above to the additional strength which the workers will gain from the knowledge that many of their dependants are se- cure from the danger of starvation in the event of a strike. But in addition to this, the feeling of security which endowment will give to every home will greatly strengthen the general confi- dence of the workers. It is well known that the principle " to him that hath shall be given " holds good in the sphere of wages. Men who have been earning wages which enable them to keep their families and themselves above the bare level of physio- logical subsistence are the very men who are more keenly aware of the uses of higher wages; they are able to appreciate the advantages of higher standards of living; they are better able to or- ganize; and their position in their conflicts with employers is stronger than that of the men in lower-paid trades. The men In lower-paid trades, In general, find It more difficult to win any advances In wage-rates, even though their prima facie need of higher wages is greater. It Is from this point of view that family en- dowment would be of immense advantage In the struggle for higher wages, especially In the lower- paid trades. A regular and more adequate family income would create a better background 26 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD for the men now in those trades; their organiza- tion would grow stronger, their efforts would be more sustained; and their view of life would change from, passive acquiescence in a state of things which kept themselves and their families below the level of even physiological subsistence, to active determination to better their conditions in ways they had not dreamt of before. With regard to the number of persons compet- ing in the labor market, it is of course dangerous to forecast coming conditions. But as far as male wage earners are concerned, there is no rea- son to suppose that the system of family en- dowment would result in any material alteration of numbers. With regard to women wage- earners, the withdrawal of large numbers of mar- ried women from the labor market, to which ad- vocates of family endowment look forward, may well be compensated as regards output by the in- creased physical and moral efficiency of labor as a whole. M-eanwhile, as far as the bargaining power of labor is concerned, nothing but an access of strength could result from a slackening of that competition which has hitherto exercised a depressing effect upon the wages of both sexes. We have already, in considering the effect of en- dowment upon the wages of women (pp. 1 1-14), given our reasons for thinking that it would do away with the present involuntary blacklegging REPORT OF COMMITTEE 27 of men by women, by depriving employers of their one really plausible if not actually valid ex- cuse for paying women less than the standard rates, and so putting competition between the sexes for the first time on a basis which is at once free and fair. We have advanced these considerations to meet the views of those who, believing that the present wages system will be retained for some time to come, fear that the scheme might result in a re- duction of wages. To those who are looking to the socialization of industry in one form or an- other, we would point out that a scheme such as the one advocated here will be found essential. Every social system, and more especially the highly organized social system, must make pro- vision for those who are unable to be producers. In this category the most important classes are the children, and the mothers who by virtue of the very service they render cannot rank as pro- ducers in the ordinary sense of the word. (b) The Effect on the Worker's Energy. It may be held that family endowment will weaken the motives which at present drive men to work hard in order to keep their families aUve and in tolerably decent conditions. But the pe- riod suggested for full endowment while there are children in the family under five — has both 28 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD a beginning and an end; and the beginning is marked by greater family requirements which make it most improbable that the father would feel that hard work was no longer necessary. Fear of starvation is not the only incentive to work ; the other incentives — pride, and ambi- tion to reach higher standards of living — become much more powerful after the physiological mini- mum has been secured. The desire to avoid star- vation for himself and his family may make the worker do a certain quantity of work, but it will never be a motive to the full exertion of his powers. In fact, fear of starvation and constant living on the verge of economic disaster pro- duces a state of mind which often leads the worker to do the absolute minimum of work both in time and effort. We believe therefore that even if endowment produced a certain proportion of cases in which men slackened their efforts, the number of these cases would be relatively small, and would be far outbalanced by those where the increased stability and comfort of home life would develop the workers' capacity for effort and stimulate their ambition. (c) The Effect on Matrimonial Relations. An objection that may be raised to the endow- ment scheme is that it might weaken the marriage ties by making the wife less dependent on her REPORT OF COMMITTEE 29 husband's earnings. Against this objection we would urge that a direct payment to the mother for her services to the community in rearing chil- dren will make it possible for marriage to be a real partnership, in which the family income is derived from the joint earnings of husband and wife. We believe that a partnership, in which both par- ties contribute, is a finer conception of marriage relations than one which is based on the financial dependence of the wife. Many of the cases of disagreement between married people may be traced directly to friction about money matters. Apart even from direct friction of this kind, the fact cannot be ignored that in present conditions the poverty and discom- fort of the home too often drive the husband to seek refuge elsewhere. By giving mothers the opportunity to improve the standard of comfort in their homes, family endowment would do a great deal to improve matrimonial relations, which cannot but be affected by the increasing poverty and discomfort which, under the present system, is brought by every additional child. {d) The EfJect on the Birth-rate. It may be objected that endowment will cause a rapid increase in the birth-rate, more especially among those classes of the community to whom the allowances will represent the greatest increase 30 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD in material wealth. Indeed, if there were good reasons to anticipate such a result, we should have here a very weighty objection to the whole scheme; for though public opinion is divided as to the desirability of an increase in the birth-rate as a whole, few people would favor an increase among those classes which are at present living at bare physical subsistence level. We believe, however, that there will be counteracting tend- encies which will reduce the danger of any such result. It is a generally accepted fact that the lowest birth-rate coincides with the highest stand- ard of living, and that the highest birth-rate co- incides with the lowest standard of living. The variation according to standard of living is illus- trated by the following table compiled by the National Birth-rate Commission from ♦:he figures of the British Registrar-iGeneral. Births per locxj Social Class. married males aged under 55 years. Upper and Middle Class 119 Intermediate 132 Skilled Workmen 153 Intermediate Class 158 Unskilled Workmen 213 In connection with their general conclusion that " the birth-rate falls as the income rises " the British Commissioners collected evidence which seems to establish the propositions that : REPORT OF COMMITTEE 31 (a) families with high incomes were limited, if at all, on what may be called " per- sonal " grounds. (b) there was an increasing tendency for fami- lies with intermediate incomes to be limited on economic grounds. (c) famihes with the lowest incomes were not limited at all — " the very hopelessness of a proper discharge of parental obli- gations breeds a recklessness in incurring them." It seems, therefore, that endowment, by light- ening the economic burdens of parenthood, would tend to operate as a stimulus to the birth-rate in class (b) which is now restricted, and unless the system is altered will probably be further re- stricted, on economic grounds. On the other hand, in the case of the unskilled workers, of whom class (c) is mainly composed, the evidence referred to above suggests that endowment would have a different effect. The " hopelessness of a proper discharge of parental obligations " would be practically abolished; it would be possible for all parents, even those with the lowest incomes, to bring up their children decently; and class (c) would be merged in class (b) — the class in which " recklessness in incurring parental obliga- tions " disappears. 32 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD In addition there is a certain non-economic effect to be considered. The woman tends to re- gard child-bearing less in terms of economic ex- pense, more in terms of physical stress and per- sonal labor, than the man. Any change which conduces to the personal dignity and social pres- tige of the woman in the home, will tend to give increased weight to those non-economic considera- tions by strengthening the hand of the person with whom they weigh most heavily. This should be an important factor in those classes of society where the woman, by reason of complete economic dependence and a life of unbroken drudgery, is at present powerless and inarticulate. There is reason to hope, therefore, that fam- ily endowment, by acting directly upon the stand- ard of living and indirectly upon the position of women, will actually tend to reduce the birth- rate among those classes of the community where there is at present no check but the physical capacity of the parents. On the other hand, en- dowment will certainly tend to increase the birth- rate among the artisan and lower-paid profes- sional classes; and this readjustment will mean that the nation will no longer be recruited in a constantly increasing proportion from the ranks of those whose children have the least chance of survival and fitness. REPORT OF COMMITTEE 33 III. — The Principles of a Concrete Scheme The reasons which have been advanced in favor of the State endowment of families make it clear that the scheme is not suggested in the spirit of poor relief. Although the adoption of the scheme would mitigate some of the worst evils of poverty, other and equally important results are aimed at in the sphere of the country's eco- nomic and social development, especially in rela- tion to the position and status of women. It may be said that it is useless for the State to assist families whose incomes are above a cer- tain level. This might be a vital consideration if the exclusion of certain classes would materially lessen the cost of the scheme. But only about six per cent, of the families in the United King- dom enjoy incomes of over £300 ($1500) a year, and the saving effected through the exclusion of these families from endowment would only amount to some £9,000,000 ($45,000,000) on a total cost of nearly £150,000,000 ($750,000,- 000). On the other hand, it would be exceed- ingly difficult to adjust allowances immediately below any maximum income that was suggested in such a way as to prevent them from depressing wages and salaries at that level; for example, if families with incomes of £290 ($1450) re- 34 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD celved endowment amounting to £54 ($270) a year, while those with £300 ($1500) received nothings the usual scale of salaries about £300 would undoubtedly be depressed. This would be an even more serious objection if the proposed maximum income for endowment were fixed at £160 or £130 ($800 or $650). Apart from this, the moral effect of treating all classes alike would be of great advantage to society; and there would be less danger of oppressive administration if the scheme were universal than if it were limited to the class with low incomes. It is in fact essential that there should be no " poverty " qualification for family endowment, nor must it be given only to widows or any other class. It must be given in respect of all children and in respect of all mothers who are occupied in, or who have to make provision for, the care of young children. Again, the payment must be made to the mother ; ^ partly in recognition of the work which the rearing of children involves, but partly also because she will thus be made responsible to the State for applying the endowment in the proper way. If the mother is dead, or if for other rea- sons such a course is desirable, payment should 1 This is intended to prevent a repetition of a feature of the first Maternity Benefit law by which the benefit was made payable to the father. Later the law was amended, making the benefit payable to the mother. — Ed. REPORT OF COMMITTEE 35 be made to another person who would assume the responsibility for the care of the children. The period during which endowment is to be paid, should, in theory, be determined by the pe- riod of total dependency; that is, for the children, until school-leaving age ; for the mothers, the time during which they are unable to do " productive " work — the period during which the rearing of children is, or should be, a full-time occupation. For mothers, therefore, the endowment should begin during pregnancy — say eight weeks before confinement — and continue until the child reaches school age, i.e., for five years. In order to secure the full social and economic effects of the scheme, the endowment for each child should continue normally until fourteen, and be extended if the child remains at school beyond that age. The first five years of life are however the most important period so far as the child's health is concerned; and in view of the assistance given or likely to be given in the near future, to parents of older children in connection with educa- tion schemes (free education, school meals, pos- sible maintenance allowances, etc.), we should suggest as a first measure that family endowment allowances should be paid for children only until they reach the age of five years. Payment of endowment to the mother and children during these periods would remove from the wages of 36 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD the individual father the main extra charges of parenthood; while it would give the mothers a real chance of feeding, clothing and looking after their children during the most critical five years of their lives. A majority of the Committee is of opinion that the benefits of endowment should be ex- tended, with certain reservations, to unmarried mothers and their children, on the ground that the effect of this would be to decrease the number of illegitimate children, by removing the condi- tions which tend to increase and perpetuate Ille- gitimacy. A minority of the Committee, while not denying that some provision for the unmar- ried mother and her children is desirable, believes that equal treatment for married and unmarried under an endowment scheme would weaken the deterrent motives and would tend to increase Ille- gitimacy. As the Committee Is not unanimous, the arguments for and against the Inclusion of this class In the scheme of endowment are given in a separate chapter, " The treatment of the unmarried mother and her children," which fol- lows the report. The duration of the endowment raises several questions in connection with the employment of women which cannot be settled within the limits of a scheme of family endowment, although It is not possible to Ignore them altogether. In the REPORT OF COMMITTEE 37 first place, family endowment would not do away with the necessity for the State provision of mid- wives and medical attendance. Again, even though the State assumed full responsibility for the mother during the period suggested, it is clear that the break in her industrial career which having children involves is still a serious problem ; and a large number of mothers would be unable, after several years' absence from industry, to resume normal employment. There can be no doubt that family endowment, by reducing the strain and semi-starvation which are now involved in rearing children, would tend to reduce the number of mothers whose work exhausts their energies. The State should, however, make pro- vision, by means of disablement pensions, for mothers who are unable to undertake ordinary employment five years after the birth of their youngest child. But these pensions should be part of a general scheme of pensions for old age and disablement, and should not be included in the scheme of family endowment. Another point to be noted is that day boarding schools would considerably lighten the tasks of the mothers whose children had reached school age, and would leave her more free to undertake employ- ment, if she wished to do so, when her endow- ment ceased. In drafting a scheme of endowment it must be 38 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD remembered that heavy additional taxation will be necessary to provide the funds required. The exact method of taxation to be employed for this purpose is not a question that can be settled within the limits of an endowment scheme; but, if the method adopted is the income tax, it will be necessary to ensure that families with moderate incomes are not penalized, i.e., that they do not have to pay more in additional taxation than they receive in endowment. This could be ar- ranged by increasing the existing abatements from income tax in respect of wife and children; or by basing the assessment on the number of persons in the family ; or by grading the endowment allow- ances in such a way that families with moderately high incomes receive higher weekly allowances to balance the extra taxation which they are required to pay.^ Apart from the question of taxation, it must be borne in mind that the endowment which would make a great difference to the family with an income of 30s. or 40s. ($7.50 or $10.00) a week would mean very little to a family with an income of £500 or £600 ($2500 or $3000) a year. It might be possible to meet this diffi- culty by a contributory insurance scheme, worked in connection with the endowment scheme. Men and women might have the option of contributing 1 See the full explanation and discussion of this method in a separate chapter following the Report; p. 63. REPORT OF COMMITTEE 39 a certain proportion of their income to a special fund; the sum of the contributions of husband and wife might then be taken as the "additional endowment value " of the wife when endowment became payable; and on the basis of this endow- ment value the State might give weekly pay- ments, additional to the regular rate of endow- ment, the cost being met out of the accumulated contributions and interest, with perhaps a pro- portionate State contribution. Such a scheme would be a great incentive to saving in all classes, and it would be specially helpful to the classes with incomes ranging from say £200 to £700 ($1000 to $3500) a year. IV. — The Scheme Proposed The amounts paid to mothers and children will not have to be large enough to maintain them separately. The ideal amount would be the dif- ference between (a) the cost of maintaining a family — husband, wife and children — which will vary with the number of children; and (b) the cost of living to a man who had no children. The difference would represent the really extra expenditure involved in having children. It seems probable that the lowest amount which would represent this difference in a home whose standard of living did not fall below the subsis- tence level is 12s. 6d. ($3.12) a week for the 40 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD mother and 5s. ($1.25) for the first child, with 3s. 6d. (87c) for the second and subsequent children. The Committee is unanimous in urging that all families with children under five years of age, whatever the family income may be, should be entitled to endowment.^ The majority of the Committee holds that the rates of endowment should be equal for all fami- lies, on the grounds that ( I ) the mother's responsibility is the same in all families, whatever the income may be; (2)' the needs, and the potential value to the country, of the children are the same in all families, whatever the income may be; (3) the State should not give preferential treatment to certain classes, especially where these classes are defined by in- come. The scale of payments suggested is therefore a flat rate for all classes as under : — , 1 Some members of the Committee feel that the number of chil- dren entitled to endowment in any one family should be limited to (say) four, on the ground that children in unduly large families can rarely receive the attention they need from the overworked mother, or be given a fair start in life. Although the Committee decided not to make any definite recommendation on this point, the view is placed on record as one that deserves consideration. REPORT OF COMMITTEE 41 Mothers — Eight weeks before confinement, and as long as they have one or more chil- dren under five years old — 1 2s. 6d. ($3.12) per week. Children — Until they reach the age of five (as a first measure only — to be extended later until school leaving age) — 5s. ($1.25) a week for the first child under five, with 3s. 6d. (87c) a week for each child under five beyond the first. That is to say, the total weekly allowance drawn by a mother with one child under five would be 17s. 6d. ($4.37), a mother with two chil- dren under five would be 21s. ($5.25), a mother with three children under five would be 24s. 6d. ($6.12), and so on. The other members of the Committee hold that a flat rate of endowment for all classes, al- though on the surface giving equal treatment to all, would in practice penalize the families with intermediate incomes, ranging say from £130 to £700 ($650 to $3500) a year, especially if the funds necessary for the purpose of endowment were raised partly or wholly by means of the in- come tax. A large part (if not all) of the en- dowment received by each family at these inter- mediate levels of income would be swallowed up by the additional taxation which would be re- 42 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD quired; and the most equitable way of meeting this difficulty would be a graded scale of endow- ment, rising in accordance with income i.e., with the amount of tax paid. Apart even from the incidence of taxation on the families with inter- mediate incomes, the minority of the Committee urges that, unless the rate of endowment is raised as income rises, endowment will have little efEect on the birth rate, and on the status and employ- ment of women, within the classes indicated. The Committee is however unanimous in recog- nizing that the effect of endowment on families at different levels of income is an important ques- tion, and a full discussion of the subject is given in a separate chapter that follows the report (p. 63, Endowment and the Family Income: a flat rate of endowment or a scale graded in ac- cordance with income?). v.— The Cost The factors determining the cost are : — ( 1 ) The number of mothers with one or more children under five. (2) The number of children under five; with their distribution among separate fam- ilies. (3) The number of mothers entitled to preg- nancy allowances each year. (4) The cost of administration. REPORT OF COMMITTEE 43 (i) No statistics are available showing the exact number of mothers in the United Kingdom with children under five. Volume VIII. of the 191 1 census gives the number of famihes with children under 10, for the County of London only, as 437)767. The population of the County of London was, in 191 1, about 4,300,000, or 9>4 per cent, of the population of the United Kingdom. Although there is no evidence that the London figures are applicable to the whole country it is probably accurate enough to take the total number of mothe'rs with children under 10 as 437,767 X 1000/95, i.e., 4,600,000. The total number of births was, in 191 1, 1,104,746. The following calculation takes no account of the decline in the birth rate; but in leaving this factor out of account it errs on the right side — it gives an over-estimate of the cost of the scheme. The difference between the mothers with chil- dren under lO 4,600,000 and those with children under i 1,100,000 is 3,500,000 That is to say, in the course of nine years 3,500,000 new mothers appear, or an average of 388,888 new mothers each year. 44 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD The number of mothers with chil- dren under 5 is therefore about .. 1,100,000 (with children under i) Plus 388,88 X 4 • 1.555.000 (with children 2-5) 2,655,000 (2) The total number of children under 5 is now about 4,670,000. These would be distrib- uted among 2,655,000 families; this is the number of children who would draw endowment at the rate for " first " children. The balance of the total number would draw at the rate for " other " children. The total number of endowed persons and the approximate annual cost is therefore: — Mothers .... 2,655,000 at 12/6 [$3.12] p. wk. £86,287,000 [$431,435,000] First children 2,655,000 at s/- t$t-25] P- wk. 34.5i5iOoo [$172,575,000] Other children 2,015,000 at 3/6 [$ .87] p. wk. 18,236,000 [$ 81,180,000] Annual Cost £139,000,000 [$695,000,000] (3) The number of mothers entitled to eight weeks' allowance before confinement would be the annual number of " new " mothers, i.e., those not already drawing allowances in respect of other children. This number, as we saw, is about 389,000; making an allowance in respect of still- births, the total annual cost under this head would be about £2,000,000 ($10,000,000). (4) The cost of administration will of course depend on the system adopted; but we believe REPORT OF COMMITTEE 45 that it will be possible to utilize much existing machinery, and that the cost of administration need not exceed £3,000,000 ($15,000,000). The total annual cost of the scheme would therefore be approximately £144,000,000 ($720,- 000,000). Note I. The additional cost of extending the children's allowances beyond the age of five years is rather less than £10^00,000 ($50,000,000) for each year's extension; i.e., if children's allow- ances were paid up to six years of age, the total annual cost would be £154,000,000 ($770,000,- 000) ; up to 15 the cost would be about £240,- 000,000 ($1,200,000,000). Note 2. The additional cost of a scheme of graded benefits such as was suggested above would be approximately £10,000,000 ($50,000,- 000) a year (on the basis of children's allow- ances up to five years only). As we have said above, the method of taxa- tion by which this sum should be raised is bound up with the general question of State finance, and cannot be discussed here. But we wish to point out, especially to those who are staggered by the suggestion that £144,000,000 ($720,000,- 000) a year should be raised .for the purpose of family endowment, that according to the latest estimates the annual national income is consid- erably over £3,000,000,000 ($15,000,000,000) ; 46 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD more than half of which sum is drawn by the classes now liable to income tax. TTiat is to say, the scheme could be financed entirely by a tax averaging 5 per cent., or is. in the £, on all in- comes (wages, salaries, profits, etc.) ; or, as alter- native which would not involve any alteration in the present level of exemption from income tax, by an addition to the present income tax averaging 10 per cent., or 2s. in the £. We are far however from regarding a further tax on in- comes as the only method of raising the sum required; apart from the income tax, increases in the estate and succession duties, or a land tax, might contribute a large part of the necessary funds; while again a reduction in the present ex- penditure on armaments might release a consid- erable sum for the purpose of endowment. Moreover, as the direct result of the establish- ment of family endowment, considerable savings would be effected — amounting probably to over £20,000,000 ($100,000,000) a year when the scheme had been in operation for some time — in the expenditure on poor relief, insurance, hospi- tals, and, we beheve, prisons and police. The adoption, in many States of the United States, of even such a limited scheme as " Mothers' Pensions " has already done much to relieve work of children's courts and reformatories. REPORT OF COMMITTEE 47 VI. — Administration In the United States mothers' pensions are usually paid by ordinary checks ^ sent through the post. It would probably be most convenient to the mothers if the weekly payments of family endowment were made in this way, or in cash, direct to their homes; but there is no objection to payment at post offices (as separation allow- ances are now paid) except the loss of time to the mother. The mother's claim to endowment in the first instance would be established by the production of birth certificates and any other evidence that was necessary, including a visit to the home, which might possibly be repeated during the period of endowment, provided that the visits were not unreasonably frequent or inquisitorial. The pay- ments before confinement might be made on the certificate of a qualified doctor or midwife; the difficulty of securing payment during exactly eight weeks before confinement is not serious, as slight errors could easily be adjusted at the other end of the mother's peribd of endowment, in such a way that she only drew endowment, in respect of one child, for five years and eight weeks in all. 1 More often by cash dispensed by county officials. Unfor- tunately, some of our Mothers' Pensions laws remain mere "scraps of paper," as the necessary funds have never been appropriated. — Ed. 48 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD The weekly payments would then be made reg- ularly, subject to the mother being able to produce evidence from time to time that the condition of the children remained satisfactory. Until we know which of the various proposals in connec- tion with a Ministry of Health, and child wel- fare in general, are likely to be adopted, it is difficult to suggest the easiest method of carrying out this part of the scheme. The nation will naturally require some assurance that the money paid to mothers for the maintenance and care of their children is used- for this purpose. On the other hand, the administration of the scheme must involve the least possible amount of supervision and investigation, and the mother who is taking proper care of her children should not be sub- jected to any burdensome regulations. But as there must be some test to show that the mother is using the endowment for the purposes for which it is given to her, it seems right that this test should be the health and general well-being of the children, and that there should be no in- quiry into the details of home arrangements or expenditure unless the condition of the children showed that the endowment was not being prop- erly applied. It is clearly most desirable that the adminis- tration of the family endowment scheme should work in with other schemes for child welfare; REPORT OF COMMITTEE 49 in the first place this would effect considerable economics; secondly, the connection between health schemes and endowment would make both more successful; thirdly, the mothers would be less opposed to the necessary supervision if this were part of a general health scheme. If infant welfare centers are considerably ex- tended and developed, in accordance with the pro- posals of the Local Government Board, periodical visits to such centers would probably give the mothers the easiest opportunity of showing that their children continued to be well looked after. Similarly, if nursery schools are established, there will presumably be in attendance qualified nurses or doctors who could report at the required in- tervals that the children were well looked after. The same procedure might be adopted for chil- dren attending any recognized infant school, clinic, or welfare center. There should be the greatest possible elasticity in the administration of the family endowment scheme ; mothers should be allowed to choose, among different ways of securing their endowment, the way that was most convenient to themselves ; in country districts espe- cially, mothers might prefer a periodical visit from a qualified nurse rather than any other method. In general, therefore, we think that payment of endowment should be made, without further 50 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD investigation of any kind, on condition that the mother obtained at regular intervals, from any registered infant welfare center, nursery school, or qualified visiting officer, a certificate that the general condition of her children was satisfactory and that no valid evidence to the contrary was received from any other source. The intervals at which such certificates would be required should be short in the case of infants — perhaps once a month until the child was six or twelve months old — and longer — '■ perhaps once a quarter — in the case of older children. If however the mother did not or could not ob- tain a satisfactory certificate at the required in- terval, the first step should be a ^dsit to her home by a qualified visitor, who would make such in- quiries and give such suggestions as seemed neces- sary. This visit would be followed up by further visits at short intervals; and we believe that by suggestions and advice the mother who was merely ignorant or careless could be led to reform her methods. If investigation showed that the father appropriated the endowment, proceedings should be taken against him. In no case should the endowment be stopped altogether, as this would have the worst possible effect on the chil- dren; but if, after the mother had been given every chance, and the fullest inquiries had been made, it seemed no longer possible to trust her REPORT OF COMMITTEE 51 to use the endowment properly, she should be regarded as unfit to look after her children, and these, together with the whole endowment, should be transferred to another specially appointed guardian, who would assume full responsibility. If the mother were dead, or for other reasons unable to look after her children, the normal guardian would of course be the father, who would receive the endowment and be responsible for making the necessary arrangements. It is clear that even if most of the necessary certificates are issued through health and educa- tional institutions, there must be a central body and also a large number of local organs which would control the general working of the scheme, require the necessary prehminary evidence, au- thorize the actual payments, arrange for inquiries in special cases, appoint guardians and otherwise coordinate the health side of the scheme with the actual machinery of payment. It is impossible at this stage to suggest which would be the most suitable department to undertake this work. If the Ministry of Health ever materializes, this and its local organs might find their main function in the administration of the family endowment scheme; but in its absence the Ministry of Pen- sions, working in conjunction with local health authorities or special committees of local authori- ties, might be the best alternative. 52 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD In present circumstances suggestions for the ad- ministration of the family endowment scheme must necessarily be indefinite. We think, how- ever, that what has been said will show the ad- ministration of this scheme will work in with pro- jected health and other schemes to a great extent, and that no vast new, costly and oppressive ma- chinery will be necessary. The real work which is the aim of this great reform will be done, not by an army of officials in state institutions but by the mothers in their homes. K. D. CouRT.NEY, Chairman. H. N. Brailsford. Eleanor F. Rathbone. A Maude Royden. Mary Stocks. Elinor Burns. 1 , • , c T-, T. IJotnt decs. Emile Burns j THE TREATMENT OF THE UNMAR- RIED MOTHER AND HER CHILDREN In most of the countries where an approach has been made to the endowment of motherhood, the State has found it advisable to grant allow- ances to unmarried mothers and their children. Thus the separation allowances paid during the war to the dependants of men in the fighting forces were given both to the married and the unmarried mothers; the exact position in Eng- land was that separation allowances were paid to de-facto wives on the same scale as to the legally married, whenever a permanent connec- tion and full economic dependence could be proved. Where the connection with the soldier had been a casual one the mother might receive an allowance for the child, but not for herself. In the State of Michigan,^ where " Mothers' Pensions " are established, there is no distinction between the married and the unmarried mothers, the latter being included in the records in the class of " deserted mothers." The maternity benefit under the British Insurance Act is paid to 1 U. S. Department of Labor's Children's Bureau. Laws Re- lating to Mothers' Pensions, p. 117. S3 54 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD the unmarried mother if she is an insured person. The tendency of legislation in all countries is to make provision for the illegitimate child on the same terms as that made for the legitimate child; this policy is governed by considerations of the general well-being of the State, and not merely by sympathy for the position of the unmarried mothers and illegitimate children. The number of illegitimate children under five in the United Kingdom is over 150,000; and it cannot be a gain to the State that this large number of chil- dren should be excluded from the scheme of en- dowment, with the inevitable results on their lives, their health, and their morality which pov- erty and inadequate care involve. Nor can the fact be ignored that the economic position of the unmarried mother often drives her on to the streets, while the possibility of keeping her child with her and of giving it proper care is the strongest incentive to her to make a new start in life. It seems therefore to the majority of the Committee to be both desirable and in ac- cordance with recent legislation that unmarried mothers and their children should be included in the scheme of endowment. The objection to their inclusion in the scheme rests on the belief that the number of illegitimate children is at present held in check by the women's fear of economic distress; and that the endow- UNMARRIED MOTHER 55 ment of the unmarried mother and her child, by weakening this fear, would result in a large in- crease in the number of illegitimate children: some women might even prefer to remain un- married if endowment made it possible for them to maintain children apart from dependence on the father. Even if economic motives were a very important factor in illegitimacy, it may be pointed out that endowment of the unmarried mother on the same terms as the married would not alter their relative economic positions; the endowment, equal for both married and unmar- ried, would not compensate the unmarried mother for the home and other standing charges which a husband's income would provide. The un- married mother would still lack even the ma- terial advantages of an orthodox union, and her position would be relatively undesirable, as it is at present. But in any case it is doubtful whether economic motives have much influence in determining the amount of illegitimacy. In- quiries into the subject show that the number of illegitimate children in any community is mainly determined by the number of unmarried women ; while bad home and working conditions are also of great importance.^ By making marriage pos- sible without the fear of the financial difficulties 1 See especially P. G. Kammerer's " The Unmarried Mother," Boston, Little Brown, 1918. S6 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD which having children involves, endowment will tend to increase the number of marriages, espe- cially in the younger age groups, and thus, by decreasing the number of unmarried women, to reduce illegitimacy. The improved standard of living which endowment will bring about will mean a general improvement in home conditions ; and the expected improvement in women's wages will also contribute to the removal of the condi- tions which encourage illegitimacy. Apart from these factors, the majority of the Committee does not believe that the payment of endowment by the State will weaken the general social attitude to the unmarried mother, which will still remain as a deterrent; and this is probably a far more important deterrent than the fear of economic distress. On these grounds therefore the ma- jority of the Committee believes that there is no foundation for the fear that the extension of en- dowment to the unmarried mother would lead to an increase in the number of illegitimate chil- dren. As a safeguard, however, it would be desirable to limit the endowment in the case of unmarried mothers to the first child only. This would en- able the mother to discharge adequately her duty to maintain and rear her child, while it would not encourage undesirables to have a succession of children for the sake of the endowment. The UNMARRIED MOTHER 57 first child would therefore — for its own sake, for the mother's and for the State's — be left with the mother, who would be responsible for its care on the regular terms of endowment ; while if a mother had more than one illegitimate child, she would be regarded as an unsuitable guardian, and her children would be taken from her and provided for under the care of specially appointed guardians. An exception should however be made in cases where the children were the off- spring of such permanent though non-legal unions as are now recognized by the State in connection with the payment of separation allowances. In Norway official guardians of illegitimate children are appointed, one of whose functions is to attempt to establish paternity and to secure from the father a contribution to the support of his child. In view of the fact that the allowances under the scheme of national endowment would not be enough for the unmarried mother and her child living by themselves, it seems desirable that a similar system of guardians should be estab- lished in Great Britain in connection with the scheme of family endowment. These guardians, in addition to ensuring the general welfare of the unmarried mother and her child, would at- tempt to establish paternity and obtain for the mother an additional contribution from the father, which would be based on the father's in- 58 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD come and would represent the contribution which he would have made to his household if the union had been legal. The system has worked well in Norway, and, by bringing home to the father the sense of his responsibility, it is expected to result in a reduction in the number of illegitimate chil- dren. The foregoing explains, in outline, the attitude of the majority of the Committee on the question of the treatment of the unmarried mother in con- nection with the scheme of family endowment. A minority of the Committee, however, at- taches greater weight to the effect on public opin- ion which would result from the extension of the endowment scheme to the unmarried mother; and the following is a statement of the minority view : — In considering this question a distinction should be drawn between more or less permanent though unlegalized unions and those which are merely casual, the result of a passing sexual impulse. Most of the former are really the result of unsat- isfactory laws, which leave the deserted husband who needs a mate and housewife, and the deserted wife who needs a breadwinner for her children, no choice but to go without or to form an irregu- lar union. The inclusion of this class in the scheme would be comparatively innocuous — UNMARRIED MOTHER 59 though the need would be better met by a reform in the laws of marriage and divorce. The case of the ordinary " chance child " is very different. Undoubtedly if we had merely to consider the interests of already existing chil- dren and their mothers, it would be better to include them. But in framing a permanent na- tional scheme, what we have to consider is how to secure the best sort of " child supply," since it is upon the quality of its citizens — their physical, mental and moral quality, — that the well-being of the community must in the long run mainly depend. Now obviously the well-being of a child cannot be ensured merely by giving it a State allowance to cover the minimum cost of physical subsistence. The constitution — physical, mental and moral — that it has inherited from its parents is also a factor in its well-being ; so are the influences which surround it; the kind of family life in which it is brought up. One of the root ideas from which the whole of the present scheme has sprung is the need to foster family life by removing the impediments which now hinder the development of its best possibilities, such as the lack of adjust- ment between the economic resources of the fam- ily and its size. Most people will agree that family life presupposes a husband and a father, 6o ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD or at best the memory and tradition of one. But the illegitimate child is practically fatherless or worse, since the subject of its father is one that it will inevitably be taught to avoid. Nor are its chances of a good inheritance at all equal to those of the legitimate child, since its very existence in most cases testifies to a want either of self- control or of moral principle on the part of both parents. Seeing then that the assumption on which the whole scheme is based is that the mother is ren- dering a service of importance to the State and that the State should secure to her the minimum of material well-being necessary to the proper performance of her task, is it not fundamentally inconsistent with this assumption to admit to the benefits of this scheme those mothers who refuse to perform their part in the implied contract by securing to their children the other minimum con- ditions of well-being represented by a stable home and an acknowledged father? Into no other branch of service, whether to the community or to the individual, is the servant allowed to thrust himself without complying with the stipulated conditions of enrollment, and then to claim the same recompense as the properly enrolled. Apart from its incongruity the inclusion of the unmarried mother in the scheme seems gravely inexpedient, because of the encouragement it UNMARRIED MOTHER 6i would give to illegitimacy. The majority of the Committee deny this, on the ground that the " general social attitude to the unmarried mother will still remain as a deterrent " and that " her position relatively (to the married) would be undesirable as it is at present." But would this be so? The social attitude towards the unmar- ried mother is the complicated product of a num- ber of considerations, religious, traditionary, economic, and fashionable, and the relative im- portance of these varies with different minds. But upon the whole the British people are law abiding and conventional. The question of what the State forbids or sanctions carries great weight with them; and if it adopts the policy of grant- ing endowment to the first child, though not to subsequent children, public opinion will soon ad- just itself accordingly. Possibly the majority have also underrated the strength of the economic motive. An income of 17s. 6d. ($4.37) a week for five years may come to be regarded as substantial out of work benefit by girls who dislike industrial employment, or are mentally or physically incompetent, and those who are of lowest caliber and least fit for mother- hood will be the most tempted to qualify for it. The paternity of illegitimate children will be harder than ever to establish, since direct proof is seldom forthcoming and the motive which now 62 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD induces many seducers to own up — pity for their victim's plight — will no longer operate. Let us admit, of course, that the present posi- tion of the unmarried mother and her child is intolerable, and let us seek by legislation ^ and organized effort to remedy it — but not as part of a scheme which is essentially constructive, not remedial. That would be like introducing an apothecary's drugs into the menu of a family din- ner. 1 Compare " Illegitimacy Laws of the United States " com- piled by Ernst Freund, and published by the Children's Bureau of the U. S. Department of Labor, with " Norwegian Laws Concerning Illegitimate Children," published also by U. S. Children's Bureau. — Ed, ENDOWMENT AND THE FAMILY INCOME A flat-rate of endowment or a scale graded in accordance with income? It is desirable to explain in some detail a possible method of grading the rates of endowment in order to compensate taxation, and to discuss the general question of whether the rate of endow- ment should be a flat-rate for all classes, or should be graded upwards in accordance with the family income. The primary purpose of graded rates would be to ensure to families with moderately high but not excessive incomes the full benefits of the scheme, in the event of the necessary funds for endowment being raised by a special tax on incomes of all kinds — wages, salaries, profits, etc. If the rates of endowment paid to all fam- ilies were equal — bringing in to the average family receiving endowment, at the rates sug- gested in Part IV. of the report, a total of £55 a year — the net yearly gain to each family dur- ing the period of endowment would be this amount, £55, less the amount of the special tax paid on the income. The amount paid in respect 63 64 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD of this tax would, of course, be higher as the income increased; so that the net benefit from en- dowment would decrease as the income rose. Hence the families with £200 or £500 a year would get less from the scheme than the family whose income was only 20s. or 30s. a week. From many points of view this would appear to be a most undesirable result ; families in the artisan and professional classes with moderate incomes would not receive the full benefits of the scheme, and the social and economic effects of endowment would hardly be felt in those classes. The only standard of living assured to the fam- ily — as opposed to the single man — would be the standard of bare physical subsistence ; at each higher standard of living the position of the family would approximate more closely to that of the single man, and therefore, within the classes with these higher standards of living, the effect of endowment on the birth-rate would be less, there would be less alteration in the social and economic position of women; and, moreover, the presence of children would always drag down the family below the standard of living which was possible for the single man at the same level of income. It is, of course, impossible to lay down any definite criteria to determine the relative merits of standards of living, but while it is true that THE FAMILY INCOME 65 much of the family expenditure in the wealthy classes is artificial and unnecessary, it cannot rea- sonably be disputed that, broadly speaking, and up to a certain limit, the standards of living are higher — that is, more desirable from the point of view of the rearing of children — in propor- tion to the family income. The point at which this ceases to be true — the income beyond which additional family expenditure is really artificial and undesirable — is difficult to determine; but there will probably be a general agreement that it does not lie below incomes of £700 a year. It seems therefore to be desirable that all fam- ilies whose incomes do not exceed £700 a year should receive the full benefit of the endowment scheme; if the average family with 30s. a week receives a net gain from endowment of £50 or £52 a year, the average family with £250, £500 or £700 a year should be given an equal net gain of £50 or £52 a year — no more but also no less than the net gain of the family with 30s. a week. The method of graded benefits is designed to secure this equality in the incidence of the scheme, by adjusting the endowment paid to the family in accordance with the special taxation paid by the family, in such a way that the net gain (en- dowment received less tax paid) is the same for all families whose incomes do not exceed £700 66 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD a year. It is not suggested that this equality should apply in the case of families with incomes of over £700 a year ; that is to say, families with incomes of £1,000 or £10,000 a year would re- ceive endowment only at the rates fixed for fam- ilies with £700 a year, though they paid far more in taxation. In order to illustrate the exact nature and working of a graded scheme of endowment such as has been suggested several tables are given below. The total number of persons to be en- dowed (according to an estimate explained in Part V. of the Report) is approximately: — 2,655,000 mothers each year. 2,655,000 " first " children each year. 2,015,000 " other " children each year. The following table I shows the estimated dis- tribution of these into classes according to family income : — Table I Index letter Annual of class — Number of endowed persons family used in in each class yearly. income. later tables. Mothers. ist children. Other. Under £130 A 2,166,480 2,166,48b 1,644,240 €130 — £160 B 146,025 146,025 110,825 £160 — £200 C 114,165 114,165 86,645 £200 — ■ £300 D 69,030 69,030 52,390 £300 — £400 E 39.825 39,825 30,225 £400 — £500 F 23,895 23.895 18,135 £500 — £600 G 15.930 15,930 12,090 £600 — £700 H 7,965 7,965 6,045 £700 and over I 71.685 71,685 54.405 THE FAMILY INCOME 67 The following table II shows how these fig- ures are arrived at; the number of income-tax payers in each class is based on the 19 16 Report of the Commissioners of Inland Revenue as far as possible, though in some cases an arbitrary subdivision is necessary; and the number of tax- payers in Class I is based on a calculation adopted by Chiozza Money in " Riches and Poverty." The first column shows the class of income — the index letter refers to Table I. The second column shows the number of income-tax payers in each class. This number multiplied by five (to allow for dependants) gives the total number of persons in that class. The total number of per- sons in each class is then taken (in the last column) as a proportion of the population; and it is assumed that the mothers and children are distributed in that proportion. Table II Proportion Index letter Number of Income Total number to total of class. Taxpayers. in class. population. I 250,000 1,250,000 .027 H 31,500 157.500 .003 G 49,500 247,500 .006 F 80,000 400,000 .009 E 140,000 700,000 .015 D 240,000 1,200,000 .026 C 400,000 2,000,000 .043 B 500,000 2,500,000 .055 A (balance) 37,545,000 .816 68 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD If the special income tax for endowment pur- poses were at the rate of 7J4 per cent, all around — which would provide the necessary total, as shown in Table V — the graded rates of endow- ment required to compensate for taxation up to incomes of £700 a year would be as in Table III for the average family of mother and two children receiving endowment. Table III iClass of Annual family Weekly rate of endowment. income. income of Mother. ist child. Others A under £130 12/6 5/- 3/6 B £130 — ^£160 13/6 6/- 4/- C £160 — £200 14/- 6/6 4/- D £200 — £300 15/- 7/- 4/6 E £300 — £400 16/- V- 5/6 F £400 — £500 17/- 9/- 6/3 G £500 — £600 18/- 10/- 7/- H £600 — £700 19/- 11/- 8/- I £700 and over 20/- 11/6 8/- Table IV shows that these rates exactly com- pensate the average family for the extra taxation paid (the calculation is based on the mean in- come in each of the higher classes), so that en- dowment received less taxation paid gives to each family an equal net gain of £50 a year. THE FAMILY INCOME 69 Table IV Pays in tax Receives Class of Family with at 7% in ] ^et annual income. income of per cent. endowment . gains. £ £ £ £ A 78 5 55 50 B 14s II 61 50 C 180 13 63 50 D 250 19 69 50 E 350 26 76 50 F 450 34 84 50 G 550 41 91 50 H 650 49 99 50 I 700 52 102 50 1,000 75 102 27 1,400 105 102 , loss 3 Table V shows the effect of this scheme on each class — the amount raised from the class in taxation, and the amount drawn by the class in endowment. The total incomes of the classes B to I (the classes now paying income tax) are based on the Inland Revenue Commissioners' Report for 1916— 17; the total national income of £2,135,000,000 is an under-estimate for pres- ent conditions — the latest estimate being £3,000,- 000,000 — but it is at any rate a safe estimate for the national income after the war, and it is even possible that lower rates of taxation might produce the required amount. 70 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD Table V Total annual Amount raised Class of income of each by 7% per income. class. cent. tax. £ £ A 1,024,000,000 76,800,000 B 72,000,000 5,400,000 C 75,000,000 5,625,000 D 63,000,000 4,725,000 E 52,000,000 3,900,000 F 41,000,000 3,075,000 G 31,000,000 2,325,000 H 23,000,000 1,725,000 I 754,000,000 56,550,000 Amount drawn by each class in endowment £ 113,356,000 8,600,000 7,012,100 4,605,000 3,047,000 1,950,000 1,414,000 777,000 7,201,000 2,135,000,000 160,000,000 148,000,000 The schedule of graded rates in Table III (and therefore Tables IV and V) is based on the assumption of a special tax at the flat rate of 7J4 per cent, on all incomes. It seems de- sirable to add an alternative schedule of graded rates of endowment based on an alternative scheme of taxation with a moderately graduated rate, e.g., 5 per cent, tax on incomes below £130 (class A). 6j4 per cent, tax on incomes from £i30-£i6o (class B). 7^ per cent, tax on incomes from £i6o-£700 (classes C-H). 1 Costs of administration and allowances during pregnancy not included. THE FAMILY INCOME 71 10 per cent, tax on incomes of over £700 (class I) . The compensating rates of endowment for these rates of tax are Table VT {cf. Table III.) CTass of Weekly rate of endowment. income. Mother. ist child. Others. A 12/6 5/- 3/6 B 13/6 6/- 4/- C 14/- 6/6 4/6 D 15/- 7/- 5/- E 16/- 8/- 5/6 F 17/- 9/3 6/3 G 18/- 10/3 7/6 H 19/- I 1/3 8/9 I 21/- 14/- 12/- Table VII shows the net result, for the av- erage family, of these rates of tax and endow- ment — Table VIII shows the result for each class. Table VII {cf. Table IV.) Family with Pays in tax. Receive en- Net Class of income of Rate Amount. dowment. gain income. £ per cent £ £ £ A 78 5 3 55 52 B 145 6y4 9 61 52 C 180 7y2 13 65 52 D 250 7y2 19 71 52 E 350 7y2 26 78 52 F 450 7y2 34 86 52 G 550 7y2 41 93 52 H 650 7y2 49 loi 52 I 700 10 70 122 52 1,000 10 100 122 22 1,250 10 125 122 loss 3 72 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD Table VIII {cf. Table V.) Total income Raised by tax. Amount drawn by of class. Rate Amount, class in endowment. Class. £ per cent :. £ £, A 1,024,000,000 5 51,200,000 113,536,000 B 72,000,000 6I/4 4,500,000 8,601,000 C 75,000,000 71/2 5,625,000 7,123,000 D 63,000,000 1V2 4,725,000 4,673,000 E 52,000,000 71/2 3,900,000 3,099.000 F 41,000,000 7y2 3,075,000 1,965,000 G 31,000,000 71/2 2,325,000 1,439,000 H 23,000,000 7y2 1,725,000 794,000 I 754,000,000 10 75,400,000 8,221,000 2,135,000,000 152,000,000 149,000,000 The working of graded rates has been ex- plained at some length in order to bring out the importance of giving full consideration to the effect which a scheme of endowment would have on families at different levels of income. If the funds which are necessary for endowment are raised by a special tax on incomes of all kinds, it seems essential, from one point of view, that families with moderately high incomes, ranging say from £130 to £700 a year, should secure net benefits equal to those secured by families with incomes of 30s. a week — and graded rates of endowment seem to be the most effective means of securing equal treatment for all families within the classes of income selected. On the other hand, however, it may be held that THE FAMILY INCOME 73 a special tax on incomes is not essential to the scheme of endowment, and on this ground it would appear that graded rates of endowment are not a necessary part of the scheme. In part V. of the Report it is suggested that the question of raising the funds cannot be considered apart from the general question of State finance, and possible sources of revenue, other than a special income tax, are indicated. If these other ways of rais- ing the funds were adopted, the question of graded rates would not arise in an acute form. There are, however, other points to be consid- ered in this connection. The scheme of family endowment, as a whole, aims at relieving the in- dividual parents of the main extra charges which having a family involves. The flat rates of en- dowment proposed in Part IV. of this Report are 12s. 6d. a week for the mother, with 5s. and 3s. 6d. for the first and subsequent children — a total, for mother and two children, of £55 a year. These rates probably represent, though not too generously, the main extra charges of a family at bare physical subsistence level. But they cannot be taken to cover the main extra charges which having a family involves at stand- ards of living which are above the level of physical subsistence. Yet, if the assistance which endowment brings to families at moderately high levels of income — from £130 to £700 — does 74 ENDOWMENT OF MOTHERHOOD not cover these main extra charges, the full social and economic effects of the scheme will not be felt in the artisan and less highly paid professional classes. It is perhaps necessary to explain, in order to avoid misunderstanding, that the important point is that, within each class of income, the man with a family should not be in a worse position finan- cially, because he has a family, than the single man in that class. A scheme of graded rates (say as in Table VI) would give the family with 30s. a week £55 more than the single man with that wage; it would give the family with £250 a year £71 a year more than the single man at that level of income; and at the level of £650 income, the family would have £101 more than the single man. This increasing differentiation between the single man and the family at each higher standard of living is obviously of great importance both for the effect in encouraging fam- ilies and in making it possible for women to claim the same rates of pay as men in those classes of income. At the same time, it would secure to the mother a more equitable proportion of the fam- ily income. On the other hand, from another point of view, which is strongly held by the majority of the ■Committee, the fundamental equality of the work of the mother, and in the needs and potential THE FAMILY INCOME 75 value to the State of the children, makes any- thing but a flat rate of endowment essentially unjust; special provision for families at certain levels of income would involve a recognition by the State of existing class differences that are based on income, and such recognition would be not only wrong in principle, but also impossible to carry through as a measure of practical poli- tics. From this point of view, it would be better to weaken the social and economic effects of en- dowment at the levels of income suggested, rather than to secure the full effects of endowment at these levels at the cost of crystallizing and per- petuating existing class differences. NOTE [from the BRITISH EDITION] The authors of this volume will welcome cor- respondence from those who are in sympathy with the proposal for the National Endowment of Motherhood. The Committee, which was formed with the primary purpose of investigat- ing the subject, now desires to extend its activi- ties, and to get into touch with organizations or individuals who are prepared to support the scheme. Communications should be addressed to Mrs. Bums, 34, Downshire Hill, London, N.W.3. 76 NEW BOOKS By Randolph Bourne: Untimely Papers ($1.50). Here are gathered together the notable political essays by this leader among the younger publicists of his day, and a fragment from an unfinished work on the State. A fresh scrutiny of this profound, brilliantly presented material confirms the widely held opinion that our country lost one of its most significant thinkers by his death. The volume includes the famous "The War and the Intellectuals" and other papers that contributed to the brief but enviable career of The Seven Arts whose editor, James Oppenheim, writes a fore- word. Waldo R. Browne (editor): Man or the State? ($1.00). As never before, the attention of students of history is concentrated on the problems of the State and on the individual's relation to it. Such books as those by Laski, Zimmern, FoUett and Burns attest the interest of contemporary scholars; this volume shows the importance to our day of their forerunners of the 19th century. It includes essays by Kropotkin, Buckle, Emerson, Thoreau, Spencer, Tolstoy and Wilde, that will live long and, as some of them are not easily accessible, the book will be doubly prized. An introduction by Mr. Browne integrates the contents and relates the best thought of the last century to the paramount political questions of our time. By Leon Duguit: Law in the Modern State ($2.50). M. Duguit is well-known as perhaps the most brilliant of living French political thinkers and the book here translated is generally regarded as his best and most suggestive work. The decline of the omnipotent state has forced into review the problems of representative government. M. Duguit discusses in this book the mechanisms by which the state may be made effectively responsible to its citizens. An introduction by Harold J. Laski traces the relation of his ideas to those of American and British thinkers. The book is not only a guide to the most vital of modern political problems but an analysis of jurisprudence which no lawyer can afford to ignore. The transla- tion is by Frida and Harold Laski. By H. N. Brailsford: The Covenant of Peace (Paper covers, 25'C.). No man in England or America is more competent to expound the basic principles that must govern a League of Nations than Mr. Brailsford whose books and articles on the subject are well known. Here he presents the entire subject in an essay that received a prize of £100 awarded by a jury that included H. G. Wells, John Gals- worthy and Professor Bury. The pamphlet is valuable to those who think they know all about the subject as well as to those who know that they know nothing about it. An introduction by Herbert Croly assists in posing the problem for the reader. PUBLISHED BY B. W. HUEBSCH NEW BOOKS By Arthur Ransome: Russia in igig ($1.50). The most intelligent and informative book on Russia that has thus far been written. The author is an expert on Russia and is one of England's best writers and most faithful reporters. The actual operations under the Soviet Republic — agriculture, industry, educa- tion, transportation and social life — are interestingly set down, and there are interviews with Lenin and all the leaders, including the heads of all the important departments of the government The announcement of this book evoked such a response as to make necessary a second printing before publication. By Lajpat Rai: The Political Future of India ($1.50). What do you know of the aspirations of 315,000,000 Indians? This is a full study of the present political situation in India, based on the Montagu-Chelmsford report of which too little is known here. Such important subjects as the public service in India, the European communities there, the Indian army and navy, tariffs, recommenda- tions for repressive legislation, education, etc., are discussed in detail. The book as a whole tends to clarify the struggle between India and Great Britain, and to explain India's reaching for democracy and the political, social and economic facts from which it derives. By Norman Angei-l: The British Revolution and the Ameri- can Democracy ($1.50). We have had popular war books; this is the authoritative after-war book. Few Americans are prepared for an intelligent discussion of the vital problems that clamor for solution. The prevailing unrest can- not be interpreted without an understanding of its universal signifi- cance. It is necessary for us to get the facts about the rise of British labor whose social programme has arrested the world's attention; about railways and other public utilities whose future control is in dispute; about conscription as a permanent policy; about the institution of private property as affected by the war; about the different defini- tions of democracy. Such information and much more, essential to the manifold study of reconstruction, is presented lucidly in this handbook to the new social and industrial order. By G. D. H. Cole: Labour in the Commonwealth ($1.50). This is virtually a restatement of those fundamental aims to which the more articulate section of British labor is endeavoring to give expression. It crystallizes the wjde-spread dissatisfaction fermenting in the minds of workers. "The commodity theory of Labour," says the author, "is fundamentally inconsistent with the recognition of the fact that 'Labour' consists of human beings." He denies the sovereignty of the state but regards it as only one among various forms of association. The book reveals the difference between the commonwealth that is and the one that might be. Mr. Cole is a leading writer in the Guild Socialist movement and this book, in the Manchester Guardia»'s opinion, is bis best since "The World of Labour." PUBLISHED BY B. W. HUEBSCH The Freema — a weekly paper edited by Mr. Francis Netlsp i Jay Nock, is planned to meet ting new sense c the new spirit of inquiry which recent events havf liberated, especiai ly in the field of economics and politi s. It foll< ''s developments in all phases of international life, and itsi iXjint of view in the discussion of industry and commerce is that of fu. dainental economics. In dealing with public affairs, both domestic ud foreign, it concerns itself more with the principles of politics thai jvith political events, personalities or superficial issues; and especially with the econOTnic" principles that underlie politics. ^ The Freeman is more interested in discovering popular sentiment than in creating It and aims rather at enlightening and unifying public opinion than at controlling or instructing it. It is grounded in the belief that the greatest public service that can be performed at this time is the promotion of free popular discussion, and that a paper which desires disinterestedly to serve its age can do no better than take this for its avowed function. In its treatment of news The Freeman does not respect the journalistic fetish of timeliness to the prejudice of accuracy, im- portance and well-reasoned discussion. It does not in any