CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030345205 Cornell University Library HX291.L12 E7 1904 Essays on the materialistic conception o olin 3 1924 030 345 205 ESSAYS Materialistic Conception of History ANTONIO LABRIOLA Professor in the University of Rome TRANSLATED BY CHARLES H. KERR CHARLES H. KERR & COMPANY , r <• 1904 ••■;•;;• 1-1 .D ] Copyright 1903 By Chaeles H. Keke & Com/any Chicago .. TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE. On the tenth of March, 1896, the same year that the last despairing revolt of the small producer against capitalism in America was to end in the overwhelming defeat of Bryan, an Italian scholar published in the city of Rome the remarkable work which is now for the first time offered to American readers. To publish this book in America at that time would have been an impossibility. The American socialist movement was then hardly more than an association of immigrants who' had brought their socialism with them from Europe'. Today it num- bers at least half a million adherents, and its plat- form is an embodiment of the ideas first adequately stated in the Communisl Manifesto of 1848, and now first adequately explained and elaborated in this remarkable work of Labriola. The central and fundamental proposition of so- cialism is not any scheme for reconstructing society, on a cut-and-dried programme, nor again is it any particular mathematical formula showing to what extent the laborer is robbed by the present system of the fruits of his labor ; it is precisely this Historical Materialism, which Labriola has so admirably ex- plained in the present work. 3 4 TRANSLATOR S PREFACE. Some idea of the place accorded to this book by European socialists may be gathered from the pref- ace to the French edition by G. Sorel, one of the most prominent socialists of France. He says : "The publication of this book marks a date in the history of socialism. The work of La- briola has its place reserved in our libraries by the side of the classic works of Marx and Engels. It constitutes an illumination and a methodical develop- ment of a theory which the masters of the new socialist thought have never yet treated in a didac- tic form. It is therefore an indispensable book for whoever wishes to understand something of prole- tarian ideas. More than the works of Marx and Engels it is addressed to that public which is un- acquainted with socialist preconceptions. In these pages the historian will find substantial and valuable suggestion for the study of the origin and transfor- mation of institutions." The economic development of the United States has reached a point where the growth of the Social- ist Party must henceforth go forward with start- ling rapidity. That the publication of this volume may have some effect in clarifying the ideas of those who discuss the principles of that party, whether with voice or pen, is the hope of the TRANSLATOR. ESSAYS ON THE MATERIALISTIC CONCEPTION OF HISTORY I. In Memory of the Communist Manifesto 7 II. Historical Materialism 93 PART I IN MEMORY OF THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO assays ON THE Materialistic Conception of History PART I IN MEMORY OF THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. I. In three years we can celebrate our jubilee. The memorable date of the publication of the Com- munist Manifesto (February, 1848) marks our first unquestioned entrance into history. To that date are referred all our judgments and all our con- gratulations on the progress made by the proletariat in these last fifty years. That date marks the be- ginning of the new era. This is arising, or, rather, is separating itself from the present era, and is de- veloping by a process peculiar to itself and thus in a way that is necessary and inevitable, whatever may be the vicissitudes and the successive phases which cannot yet be foreseen. All those in our ranks who have a desire or an occasion to possess a better understanding of their 9 10 IN MEMORY OF THE own work should bring to mind the causes and the moving forces which determined the genesis of the Manifesto, the circumstances under which it ap- peared on the eve of the Revolution which burst forth from Paris to Vienna, from Palermo to Ber- lin. Only in this way will it be possible for us to find, in the present social form the explanation of the tendency toward socialism, thus showing by its present necessity the inevitability of its triumph. Is not that in fact the vital part of the Manifesto, its essence and its distinctive character ? We surely should be taking a false road if we re- garded as the essential part the measures advised and proposed at the end of the second chapter for the contingency of a revolutionary success on the part of the proletariat, — or again the indications of political relationship to the other revolutionary par- ties of that epoch which are found in the fourth chapter. These indications and these measures, al- though they deserved to be taken into consideration at the moment and under the circumstances where they were formulated and suggested, and although they may be very important for forming a precise es- timate of the political action of the German com- munists in the revolutionary period from 1848 to 1850, henceforth no longer form for us a mass of practical judgments for or against which we should take sides in each contingency. The political par- ties which since the International have established themselves in different countries, in the name of the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 11 proletariat, and taking it clearly for their base, have felt, and feel, in proportion as they are born and de- velop, the imperious necessity of adopting and con- forming their programme and their action to cir- cumstances always different and multiform. But not one of these parties feels the dictatorship of the proletariat so near that it experiences the need or desire or even the temptation to examine anew and pass judgment upon the measures proposed in the Manifesto. There are really no historic experiences but those that history makes itself. It is as im- possible to foresee them as to plan them beforehand or make them to order. That is what happened at the moment of the Commune, which was and which still remains up to this day the only experience (al- though partial and confused because it was sudden and of short duration) of the action of the pro- letariat in gaining control of political power. This experience, too, was neither desired nor sought for, but imposed by circumstances. It was heroically carried through and it has become a salutary lesson for us to-day. It might easily happen that where the socialist movement is still in its beginnings, ap- peal may be made, for lack of personal direct experi- ence — as often happens in Italy — to the authority of a text from the Manifesto as if it were a precept, but these passages are in reality of no importance. Again, we must not, as I believe, seek for this vital part, this essence, this distinctive character, in what the Manifesto says of the other forms of so- 12 IN MEMORY OF THE cialism of which it speaks under the name of litera- ture. The entire third chapter may doubtless serve for defining clearly by way of exclusion and an- tithesis, by brief but vigorous characterizations, the differences which really exist between the com- munism commonly characterized to-day as scien- tific, — an expression sometimes used in a mistaken and contradictory way, — that is to say, between the communism which has the proletariat for its sub- ject and the proletarian revolution for its theme, and the other forms of socialism ; reactionary, bourgeois, semi-bourgeois, petit-bourgeois, Utopian, etc. All these forms except one* have re-appeared and re- newed themselves more than once. They are re- appearing under a new form even to-day in the countries where the modern proletarian movement is of recent birth. For these countries and under these circumstances the Manifesto has exercised and still exercises the function of contemporary criti- cism and of a literary whip. And in the countries where these forms have already been theoretically and practically outgrown, as in Germany and Aus- tria, or survive only as an individual opinion among a few, as in France and England, without speaking of other nations, the Manifesto from this point of * I refer to that form which the Manifesto designates ironically under the name of "German or 'True' Socialism." This paragraph, which is unintelligible for those who are not well versed in the German philosophy of that epoch, notably in certain of its tendencies marked by acute de- generacy, has, with good reason, been suppressed in the Spanish translation. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 13 view has played its part. It thus merely records as a matter of history something no longer necessary to think of, since we have to deal with the political action of the proletariat which already is before us in its gradual and normal course. That was, to anticipate, the attitude of mind of those who wrote it. By the force of their thought and with some scanty data of experience they had anticipated the events which have occurred and they contented themselves with declaring the elimination and the condemnation of what they had outgrown. Critical communism — that is its true name, and there is none more exact for this doctrine — did not take its stand with the feudalists in regretting the old society for the sake of criticising by contrast the contemporary society: — it had an eye only to the future. Neither did it associate itself with the petty bourgeois in the desire of saving what cannot be saved : — as, for example, small proprietorship, or the tranquil life of the small proprietor whom the bewildering action of the modern state, the neces- sary and natural organ of present society, destroys and overturns, because by its constant revolutions it carries in itself the necessity for other revolutions new and more fundamental. Neither did it translate into metaphysical whimsi-- calities, into a sickly sentimentalism, or into a re- ligious contemplation, the real contrasts of the ma- terial interests of every day life : on the contrary, it exposed those contrasts in all their prosaic reality. It did not construct the society of the future upon a 14 IN MEMORY OF THE plan harmoniously conceived in each of its parts. It has no word of eulogy and exaltation, of invoca- tion and of regret, for the two goddesses of philo- sophic mythology, justice and equality, those two goddesses who cut so sad a figure in the practical affairs of everyday life, when we observe that the history of so many centuries maliciously amuses it- self by nearly always contradicting their infallible suggestions. Once more these communists, while declaring on the strength of facts which carry con- viction that the mission of the proletarians is to be the grave diggers of the bourgeoisie, still recognize the latter as the author of a social form which rep- resents extensively and intensively an important stage of progress, and which alone can furnish the field for the new struggles which already give promise of a happy issue for the proletariat. Never was funeral oration so magnificent. There is in these praises addressed to the bourgeoisie a certain tragical humor, — they have been compared to dith- yrambics. The negative and antithetical definitions of other forms of socialism then current, which have often re-appeared since, even up to the present time, al- though they are fundamentally beyond criticism both in their form and their aim, nevertheless, do not pretend to be and are not the real history of so- cialism; they furnish neither its outlines nor its plan for him who would write it. History in reality does not rest upon the distinction between the true and the false, the just and the unjust and still less COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 15 upon the more abstract antithesis between the possi- ble and the real as if the things were on one side and on another side were their shadows and their reflections in ideas. History is all of a piece, and it_rests upon Ui^process..of..foj:rnation aiid, trans- formation of society; and that evidently in a fashion altogether objective and independent of our approval or disapproval. It is a dynamic of a special class to speak like the positivists who are so dainty with expressions of this sort but are often dominated by the new phrases which they have put out. The different socialist forms of thought and action which have appeared and disappeared in the course of the centuries, so different in their causes, their aspects, and their effects, are all to be studied and explained by the specific and complex conditions of the social life in which they were produced. Upon a close examination it is seen that they do not form one single whole of continuous process because the series is frequently interrupted by changes in the social fabric and by the disappearance and breaking off of the tradition. It is only since the French Revolu- tion that socialism presents a certain unity of pro- cess, which appears more evident since 1830 with the definite political supremacy of the capitalist class in France and England and which finally be- comes obvious, we might say even palpable, since the rise of the International. Upon this road the Manifesto stands like a colossal guide post bearing d double inscription : on one side the first sketch of the new doctrine which has now made the circle of 16 IN MEMORY OF THE the world ; on the other, the definition of its rela- tions to the forms which it excludes, without giving, however, any historic account of them. ter of this work are all contained in Jthe new conceg- tiqn^of history which permeates it and. whigh^injt is pjrtially explained and developed. By the aid of this conception communism, ceasing to be a hope, an aspiration, a remembrance, a conjecture, an ex- pedient, found for the first time its adequate ex- pression in the realization of its very necessity, that is to say, in the realization that it is the outcome and the solution of the struggles of existing classes. These struggles have varied according to times and places and out of them history has developed ; but, they are all reduced in our days to> the single strug- gle between the capitalist bourgeoisie and the work- ingmen inevitably forced into the ranks of the pro- letariat. The Manifesto gives the genesis of this struggle; it details its evolutionary rhythm, and predicts its final result. In that conception of history is embodied the whole doctrine of scientific communism. From that moment the theoretical adversaries of socialism have no longer had to discuss the abstract possibility of > the democratic socialization of the means of pro- duction;* as if it were possible in this question to * It is better to use the expression "democratic social- ization of the means of production" than that of "collective property" because the latter implies a certain theoretical error in that, to begin with, it substitutes for the real econ- COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 17 rest their judgment upon inductions based upon the general and common aptitudes of what they char- acterize as human nature. Thenceforth, the ques- tion was to recognize, or not to recognize, in the course of human events the necessity which stands over and above our sympathy and our subjective as- sent. Is or is not society in the countries most ad- vanced in civilization organized in such a way that it will pass into communism by the laws inherent in its own future, once conceding its present economic structure and the friction which it necessarily, pro- duces within itself, and which will end by breaking and dissolving it? That is the subject of all dis- cussion since the appearance of this theory and thence follows also the rule of conduct which im- poses itself upon the action of the socialist parties whether they be composed of proletarians alone or whether they have in their ranks men who have come out from the other classes and who join as volunteers the army of the proletariat. That is why we voluntarily accept the epithet of scientific, provided we do not thus confuse ourselves WthJhejp,ositivisJ:s, sometimes embarrassing guests, who assume to themselves a monopoly of science; we do not seek to maintain an abstract and generic omic fact a juridical expression and moreover in the mind of more than one it is confused with the increase of monopolies, with the increasing statization of public util- ities and with all the other fantasmagoria of the ever recurring State socialism, the whole effect of which is to increase the economic means of oppression in the hands of the oppressing class. 18 IN MEMORY OF THE thesis like lawyers or sophists, and we do not plume ourselves on demonstrating the reasonableness of our aims. Our intentions are nothing less than the theoretical expression and the practical explanation of the data offered us by the interpretation of the process which is being accomplished among us and about us and which has its whole existence in the objective relations of social life of which we are the subject and the object, the cause and the effect. Our aims are rational, not because they are founded on arguments drawn from the reasoning of reason, but because they are derived from the objective study of things, that is to say, from the explanation of their process, which is not, and which cannot be, a result of our will but which on the contrary tri- umphs over our will and subdues it. Not one of the previous or subsequent works of the authors of the Manifesto themselves, although they have a much more considerable scientific lean- ing, can replace the Manifesto or have the same specific efficacy. It gives us in its classic simplicity the true expression of this situation ; the modern proletariat exists, takes its stand, grows and de- velops in contemporary history as the concrete sub- ject, the positive force whose necessarily revolution- ary action must find in communism its necessary outcome. And that is why this work while giving a theoretical base to its prediction and expressing it in brief, rapid and concise formulae, forms a store- house, or rather an inexhaustible mine of embryonic thoughts which the reader may fertilize and multi- COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 19 ply indefinitely; it preserves all the original and originating force of the thing which is but lately born and which has not yet left the field of its pro- duction. This observation is intended especially for those who applying a learned ignorance, when they are not humbugs, charlatans, or amiable dilet- tanti, give to the doctrine of critical communism precursors, patrons, allies and masters of every class without any respect for common sense and the most vulgar chronology. Or again, they try to bring back our materialistic conception of history into the theory of universal evolution which to the minds of many is but a new metaphor of a new metaphysics. Or again they seek in this doctrine a derivative of Darwinism which 19 an analogous theory only in a certain point of view and in a very broad sense ; or again they have the condescension to favor us with the alliance or the patronage of that positive philos- ophy which extends from Comte, that degenerate and reactionary disciple of the genial Saint-Simon, to Spencer, that quintessence of anarchical capital- ism, which is to say that they wish to give us for allies our most open adversaries. It is to its origin that this work owes its fertiliz- ing power, its classic strength, and the fact that it has given in so few pages the synthesis of so many series and groups of ideas.* * Twenty-five octavo pages in the original edition (Lon- don, February, 1848) for a copy of which I am indebted to the special kindness of Engels. I should say here in 20 IN MEMORY OF THE It is the work of two Germans, but it is not either in its form or its basis the expression of per- sonal opinion. It contains no trace of the impreca- tions, or the anxieties, or the bitterness familiar to all political refuges and to all those who have volun- tarily abandoned their country to breathe elsewhere freer air. Neither do we find in it the direct re- production of the conditions of their own country, then in a deplorable political state and which could not be compared to those of France and England socially and economically, except as regards certain portions of their territory. They brought to their work, on the contrary, the philosophic thought which alone had placed and maintained their coun- try upon the level of contemporary history: — this philosophic thought which in their hands was un- dergoing that important transformation which per- mitted materialism, already renewed by Feuerbach combined with dialectics, to embrace and understand the movement of history in its most secret and until then unexplored causes, — unexplored because hid- den and difficult to observe. Both were commun- ists and revolutionists, but they were so neither by instinct, by impulse nor by passion. They had elab- orated an entirely new criticism of economic science passing that I have resisted the temptation to affix any bibliographical notes, references and citations, for I should then have been making a work of scholarship, or a book, rather than a simple essay. I hope the reader will take my word for it that there are in this essay no allusions or statements of fact or opinion, which I could not sub- stantiate with authorities. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 21 and they had understood the connection and the historic meaning of the proletarian movement on both sides of the Channel, in France and in Eng- land, before they were called to give in the Mani- festo the programme and the doctrine of the Com- munist League. This had its center in London and numerous branches on the continent; it had behind it a life and development of its own. Engels had already published a critical essay in which passing over all subjective and one-sided corrections he brought out for the first time in an objective fashion the criticism of political economy and of the antitheses inherent in the data and the concepts of that economy itself, and he had become celebrated by the publication of a book on the con- dition of the English working class which was the first attempt to represent the movements of the working class as the result of the workings of the forces and means of production.* Marx, in the few years preceding, had become known as a radical publicist in Germany, Paris and Brussels. He had conceived the first rudiments of the materialistic conception of history. He had made a theoretically victorious criticism of the hypotheses of Proudhon and the deductions from his doctrine, and had given the first precise explanation of the origin of surplus value as a consequence of the purchase and the use * The "Umrisse zu einer Kritik der National- oekonomie" appeared in the German-French Year Book, Paris, 1844, pp. 85-114; and his book on "The Condition of the Working Class in England" at Leipzig in 1845. 22 IN MEMORY OF THE of labor power, that is to say the first germ of the conceptions which were later demonstrated and ex- plained in their connection and their details in Capi- tal. Both men were in touch with the revolutionists of the different countries of Europe, notably France, Belgium and England ; their Manifesto was not the expression of their personal theory, but the doctrine of a party whose spirit, aim and activity already formed the International Workingmen's Associa- tion. These are the beginnings of modern socialism. We find there the line which separates it from all the rest. The Communist League grew out of the League of the Just; the latter in its turn had been formed with a clear consciousness of its proletarian aims through a gradual specialization of the generic group of the refugees, the exiles. As a type, bear- ing within itself in an embryonic design the form of all the later socialist and proletarian movements, it had traversed the different phases of conspiracy and of equalitarian socialism. It was metaphysical with Gruen and Utopian with Weitling. Having its principal seat at London it was interested in the Chartist movement and had had some influence over it. This movement showed by its disordered char- acter, because it was neither the fruit of a premedi- tated experience, nor the embodiment of a con- spiracy or of a sect, how painful and difficult was the formation of a proletarian political party. The COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 23 socialist tendency was not manifested in Chartism until the movement was near its end and was nearly finished (though Jones and Horner can never be forgotten). The League everywhere carried an odor of revolution, both because the thing was in the air and because its instinct and method of pro- cedure tended that way : and as long as the revolu- tion was bursting forth effectively, it provided it- self, thanks to the new doctrine of the Manifesto, with an instrument of orientation which was at the same time a weapon for combat. In fact, already international, both by the quality and differences of origin of its members, and still more by the result of the instinct and devotion of all, it took its place in the general movement of political life as the clear and definite precursor of all that can to-day be called modern socialism, if by modern we mean not the simple fact of extrinsic chronology but an index of the internal or organic process of society. A long interruption from 1852 to 1864 which was the period of political reaction and at the same time that of the disappearance, the dispersion and the ab- sorption of the old socialist schools, separates the International of the Arbeiterbildungsverein of Lon- don, from the International properly so called, which, from 1864 to 1873, strove to put unity into the struggle of the proletariat of Europe and Amer- ica. The action of the proletariat had other in- terruptions especially in France, and with the ex- ception of Germany, from the dissolution of the In- ternational of glorious memory up to the new In- 24 IN MEMORY OF THE ternational which lives to-day through other means and which is developing in other ways, both of them adapted to the political situation in which we live, and based upon riper experience. But just as the survivors of those who in December, 1847, dis- cussed and accepted the new doctrine, have re-ap- peared on the public scene in the great International, and later again in the new International, the Mani- festo itself has also re-appeared little by little and has made the tour of the world in all the languages of the civilized countries, something which it prom- ised to do but could not do at the time of its first ap- pearance. There was our real point of departure ; there were our real precursors. They marched before all the others, early in the day, with a step rapid but sure, over this exact road which we were to traverse and which we are traversing in reality. It is not proper to give the name of our precursors to those who followed ways which they later had to abandon, or to those who, to speak without metaphor, formulated doctrines and started movements, doubtless explica- ble by the times and circumstances of their birth, but which were later outgrown by the doctrine of critical communism, which is the theory of the pro- letarian revolution. This does not mean that these doctrines and these attempts were accidental, use- less and superfluous phenomena. There is nothing irrational in the historic course of things because nothing comes into existence without reason, and thus there is nothing superfluous. We cannot even COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 35 to-day arrive at a perfect understanding of critical communism without mentally retracing these doc- trines and following the processes of their appear- ance and disappearance. In fact these doctrines have not only passed, they have been intrinsically outgrown both by reason of the change in the con- ditions of society and by reason of the more exact understanding of the laws upon which rest its for- mation and its process. The moment at which they enter into the past, that is to say, that at which they are intrinsically outgrown, is precisely that of the appearance of the Manifesto. As the first index of the genesis of modern socialism, this writing, which gives only the most general and the most easily accessible features of its teaching, bears within itself traces of the his- toric field within which it is born, which was that of France, England and Germany. Its field for prop- aganda and diffusion has since become wider and wider, amd it is henceforth as vast as the civilized world. In all countries in which the tendency to communism has developed through antagonisms under aspects different but every day more evident between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, the process of its first formation is wholly or partly re- peated over and over. The proletarian parties which are formed little by little have traversed anew the stages of formation which their precursors trav- ersed at first ; but this process has become from country to country and from year to year always more rapid by reason of the greater evidence, the 26 IN MEMORY OF THE pressing necessity and energy of the antagonisms, and because it is easier to assimilate a doctrine and a tendency than to create both for the first time. Our co-workers of 50 years ago were also from this point of view international, since by their ex- ample they started the proletariat of the different nations upon the general march which labor must accomplish. But the perfect theoretical knowledge of social- ism to-day, as before, and as it always will be, lies in the understanding of its historic necessity, that is to say, in the consciousness of the manner of its genesis ; and this is precisely reflected, as in a limited field of observation and in a hasty example, in the formation of the Manifesto. It was intended for a weapon of war and thus it bears upon its own exterior the traces of its origin. It contains more substantial declarations than demonstrations. The demonstration rests entirely in the imperative force of its necessity. But we may retrace the process of this formation and to retrace it is to understand truly the doctrine of the Manifesto. There is an analysis which while separating in theory the fac- tors af an organism destroys them in so far as they are elements contributing to the unity of the whole. But there is another analysis, and this alone permits us to understand history, which only distinguishes and separates the elements to find again in them the objective necessity of their co-operation toward the total result. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 27 It is now a current opinion that modern socialism is a normal and thus an inevitable product of history. Its political action, which may in future involve delays and set-backs but never henceforth a total absorption, began with the International. Never- theless the Manifesto precedes it. Its teaching is of prime importance in the light which it throws on the proletarian movement, which movement indeed had its birth and development independently of any doctrine. It is also more than this light. Critical communism dates from the moment when the pro- letarian movement is not merely a result of social conditions, but when it has already strength enough to understand that these conditions can be changed and to discern what means can modify them and in what direction. It was not enough to say that so- cialism was a result of history. It was also neces- sary to understand the intrinsic causes of this out- come and to what all its activity tended. This af- firmation, that the proletariat is a necessary result of modern society, has for its mission to succeed the bourgeoisie, and to succeed it as the producing force of a new social order in which class antagonisms shall disappear, makes of the Manifesto a charac- teristic epoch in the general course of history. It is a revolution — but not in the sense of an apoca- lypse or a promised millennium. It is the scientific and reflected revelation of the way which our civil society is traversing (if the shade of Fourier will^ pardon me!). The Manifesto thus gives us the inside history of 28 IN MEMORY OF THE its origin and thereby justifies its doctrine and at the same time explains its singular effect and its wonderful efficacy. Without losing ourselves in de- tails, here are the series and groups of elements which, reunited and combined in this rapid and exact synthesis, give us the clue to all the later de- velopment of scientific socialism. The immediate, direct and appreciable material is given by France and England which had already had since 1830 a working-class movement which sometimes resembles and sometimes differentiates itself from the other revolutionary movements and which extended from instinctive revolt to the prac- tical aims of the political parties (Chartism -and Social Democracy for example) and gave birth to different temporary and perishable forms of com- munism and semi-communism like that to which the name of socialism was then given. To recognize in these movements no longer the fugitive phenomenon of meteoric disturbances but a new social fact, there was need of a theory which should explain them, — and a theory which should not be a simple complement of the democratic tradition nor the subjective correction of the disadvantages, thenceforth recognized, of the economy of competition: although many were then concerned with this. This new theory was the per- sonal woik of Marx and Engels. They carried over the conception of historical progress through the process of antitheses from the abstract form, which COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 29 the Hegelian dialectic had already described in its most general features, to the concrete explanation of the class struggle ; and in this historic movement where it had been supposed that we observed the passage from one form of ideas to another form they saw for the first time the transition from one form of social anatomy to another, that is from one form of economic production to another form. This historic conception, which gave a theoretic form to this necessity .of the new social revolution more or less explicit in the instinctive consciousness of the proletariat and in its passionate and sponta- neous movements, recognizing the intrinsic and im- minent necessity of the revolution, changed the con- cept of it. That which the sects of conspirators had regarded as belonging to the domain of the will and capable of being constructed at pleasure, became a simple process which might be favored, sustained and assisted. The revolution became the object of a policy the conditions of which are given by the complex situation of society; it therefore became a result which the proletariat must attain through struggles and various means of organization which the old tactics of revolts had not yet imagined. And this because the proletariat is not an accessory and auxiliary means, an excrescence, an evil, which can be eliminated from the society in which we are liv- ing but because it is its substratum, its essential condition, its inevitable effect and in turn the cause which preserves and maintains society itself; and thus it cannot emancipate itself without at the same 30 IN MEMORY OF THE time emancipating every one, that is to say, revolu- tionizing completely the form of production. Just as the League of the Just had become The Communist League by stripping itself of the forms of symbolism and conspiracy and adopting little by little the means of propaganda and of political ac- tion from and after the check attending the insur- rection of Barbes and Blanqui (1839), so likewise the new doctrine, which the League accepted and made its own, definitely abandoned the ideas which inspired the action of conspiracies, and conceived as the outcome and objective result of a process, that which the conspirators believed to be the result of a pre-determined plan or the emanation from their heroism. At that point begins a new ascending line in the order of facts and another connection of concepts and of doctrines. The communism of conspiracy, the Blanquism of that time, carries us up through Buonarotti and also through Bazard and the "Carbonari" to the con- spiracy of Baboeuf, a true hero of ancient tragedy who hurled himself against fate because there was no connection between his aim and the economic condition of the moment, and he was as yet in- capable of bringing upon the political scene a pro- letariat having a broad class consciousness. From Baboeuf and certain less known elements of the Jacobin period, past Boissel and Fauchet we ascend to the intuitive Morelly and to the original and COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 31 versatile Mably and if you please to the chaotic Testament of the cure Meslier, an instinctive and violent rebellion of "good sense" against the savage oppression endured by the unhappy peasant. These precursors of the socialism of violence, pro- test and conspiracy were all equalitarians ; as were also most of the conspirators. Thus by a singular but inevitable error they took for a weapon of combat, interpreting it and generalizing it, that same doctrine of equality which developing as a natural right parallel to the formation of the economic theory, had become an instrument in the hands of the bourgeoisie which was winning step by step its present position to transform the society of privilege into that of liberalism, free exchange and the civil code.* Following this immediate deduction which at bottom was a simple illusion, that all men being equal in nature should also be equal in their enjoy- ments, it was thought that the appeal to reason car- ried with it all the elements of propaganda and per- suasion, and that the rapid, immediate and violent taking possession of the exterior instruments of * In these last years many jurists have thought they found in the re-adjustment of the civil Code a practical means for ameliorating the condition of the proletariat. But why have they not asked the pope to become the head of the free thought league? The most delightful of these is that Italian author who occupying himself with the class struggle asks that by the side of the code which establishes the rights of capital another be elaborated which should guarantee the rights of labor. 32 IN MEMORY OF THE political power was the only means to set to right those who resisted. But whence come and how persist all these inequalities which appear so irrational in the light of a concept of justice so simple and so elementary ? The Manifesto was the clear negation of the prin- ciple of equality understood so naively and so clum- sily. While proclaiming as inevitable the abolition of classes in the future form of collective produc- tion, it explains to us the necessity, the birth and the development of these very classes as a fact which is not an exception, or a derogation of an abstract principle, but the very process of history. Even as the modern proletariat involves the bourgeoisie, so the latter cannot exist without the former. And both are the result of a process of formation which rests altogether upon the new mode of production of the objects necessary to life, that is to say, which rests altogether upon the man- ner of economic production. The bourgeois society grew out of the corporative and feudal society and it grew out of it through struggle and revolution in order to take possession of the instruments and means of production which all culminate in the for- mation, the development and the multiplication of capital. To describe the origin and the progress of the bourgeoisie in its different phases, to explain its successes in the colossal development of technique and in the conquest of the world market, and to point out the political transformations which fol- lowed it, which are the expression, the defense and COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 33 the result of these conquests is, at the same time, to write the history of the proletariat. The latter in its present condition is inherent in the epoch of bourgeois society and it has had, it has, and will have as many phases as that society itself up to the time of its extinction. The antithesis of rich and poor, of happy and unhappy, of oppressors and op- pressed is not something accidental which can easily be put on one side as was believed by the enthusiasts of justice. Still further it is a fact of necessary correlation, once granted the directing principle of the present form of production which makes the wageworker a necessity. This necessity is double. Capital can only take possession of production by converting laborers into proletarians and it cannot continue to live, to be fruitful, to accumulate, to multiply itself and to transform itself except on the condition of paying wages to those whom it has made proletarians. The latter, on their side, can only live and reproduce their kind on the condition of selling themselves as labor power, the use of which is left to the discretion, that is to say, to the good pleasure of the possessors of capital. The harmony between capital and labor is wholly con- tained in this fact that labor is the living force by which the proletarians continually put in mo- tion and reproduce by adding to it the labor accu- mulated in the capital. This connection resulting from a development which is the whole inner es- sence of modern history, if it gives the key to com- prehend the true reason of the new class struggle 34 IN MEMORY OF THE of which the communist conception has become the expression, is of such a nature that no sentimental protest, no argument based on justice can resolve it and disentangle it. It is for these reasons which I have explained here as simply as possible that equalitarian com- munism remained vanquished. Its practical power- lessness blended with its theoretical inability to ac- count for the causes of the wrongs or of the inequal- ities which it desired, bravely or stupidly, to de- stroy or eliminate at a blow. To understand history became thenceforth the principal task of the theorists of communism. How could a cherished ideal be still opposed to the hard reality of history? Communism is not the natural and necessary state of human life in all times and in all places and the whole course of historic for- mations cannot be considered as a series of devia- tions and wanderings. One does not reach com- munism nor return to it by Spartan abnegation or Christian resignation. It can be, still more it must be and it will be the consequence of the dissolution of our capitalist society. But the dissolution can- not be inoculated into it artificially nor imported from without. It will dissolve by its own weight as Machiavelli would say. It will disappear as a form of production which engenders of itself and in itself the constant and increasing rebellion of its produc- tive forces against the conditions (juridical and political) of production and it continues to live only COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 35 by augmenting 1 (through competition which engen- ders crises, and by a bewildering extension of its sphere of action) the intrinsic conditions of its in- evitable death. The death of a social form like that which comes from natural death in any other branch of science becomes a physiological case. The Manifesto did not make, and it was not its part to make the picture of a future society. It told how our present society will dissolve by the progressive dynamics of its forces. To make this understood it was necessary above all to explain the development of the bourgeoisie and this was done in rapid sketches, a model philosophy of his- tory, which can be retouched, completed and de- veloped, but which cannot be corrected.* Saint-Simon and Fourier, although neither their ideas nor the general trend of their development were accepted, found their justification. Idealists both, they had by their heroic vision transcended the "liberal" epoch which in their horizon had its culminating point at the epoch of the French revolu- tion. The former in his interpretation of history substituted social physics for economic law and poli- tics, and in spite of many idealistic and positivistic uncertainties, he almost discovered the genesis of the third estate. The other, ignorant of details which were still unknown or neglected, in the ex- uberance of his undisciplined spirit imagined a great chain of historic epochs vaguely distinguished * This development has been given in Marx's Capital which can be considered as a philosophy of history. 36 IN MEMORY OF THE by certain indications of the directing principle of the forms of production and distribution. He there- upon proposed to himself to construct a society in which the existing antitheses should disappear. From all these antitheses he discovered by a flash of genius and he, more than any other, developed "the vicious circle of production" ; he there unconsciously reached the position of Sismondi, who at the same epoch, but with other intentions and along different roads, studying crises and denouncing the disad- vantages of the large scale industry and of unbridled competition, announced the collapse of the newly established economic science. From the summit of his serene meditation on the future world of the harmonians he looked down with a serene contempt upon the misery of civilization and unmoved wrote the satire of history. Ignorant both, because ideal- ists, of the bitter struggle which the proletariat is called upon to maintain before putting an end to the epoch of exploitation and of antitheses, they arrived through a subjective necessity at their conclusions, in the one case scheme-making, in the other utopian- ism. But as by divination they foresaw some of the direct principles of a society without antitheses. The former reached a clear conception of the tech- nical government of society in which should disap- pear the domination of man over man, and the other divined, foresaw and prophesied along with the ex- travagances of his luxuriant imagination a great number of the important traits of the psychology and pedagogy of that future society in which ac- COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 3? cording to the expression of the Manifesto, "the free development of each is the condition of the free development of all." Saint-Simonism had already disappeared when the Manifesto appeared. Fourierism, on the con- trary, was flourishing in France and in consequence of its nature not as a party but as a school. When the school attempted to realize its Utopia by means of the law, the Parisian proletarians had already been beaten in those days of June by that bourgeoisie which through this victory was prepar- ing a master for itself: it was a military adventurer whose power lasted twenty years. It is not in the name of a school, but as the promise, the threat, and the desire of a party that the new doctrine of critical communism presented itself. Its authors and its adherents did not feed upon the Utopian manufacture of the future but their minds were full of the experience and the ne- cessity of the present. They united with the pro- letarians whom instinct, not as yet fortified by ex- perience, impelled to overthrow, at Paris and in England, the rule of the bourgeois class with a rapidity of movement not guided by well-considered tactics. These communists disseminated their revo- lutionary ideas in Germany : they were the defenders of the June martyrs, and they had in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung a political organ, extracts from which, reproduced occasionally after so many years, 38 IN MEMORY OF THE still carry authority.* After the disappearance of the historic situations which in 1848 had pushed the proletarians to the front of the political stage, the doctrines of the Manifesto no longer found either a foundation or a field for diffusion. Many years were required before it circulated again and that because many years were required before the proletariat could re-appear by other roads and un- der other methods as a political force upon the scene, making of this doctrine its intellectual organ and directing its course by it. But from the day when the doctrine appeared it made its anticipated criticism of that socialismus vulgaris which was flourishing in Europe and es- pecially in France from the coup d'Etat to the In- ternational ; the latter moreover in its short period of life had not time to vanquish and eliminate it. This vulgar socialism found its intellectual food (when nothing even more incoherent and chaotic was at hand) in the doctrine and especially in the paradoxes of Proudhon who had already been van- quished theoretically by Marxf but who was not * It was not until after the publication of the Italian edition of this essay that I had at my disposal for some months a complete collection of the Neue Rheinische Zeitung for which I owe hearty thanks to the Partei- Archiv of Berlin. The impression derived from this read- ing surpasses expectation. It is desirable either that this journal which now has become very rare, be reprinted entire or that the most important articles and letters in it be reproduced. tMisere de la Philosophie, by Karl Marx, Paris and Brussels, 1847; new edition, Paris, Giard and Briere, 1896. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 39 vanquished practically until the time of the Com- mune when his disciples, and it was a salutary les- son in affairs, were forced to act in opposition to their own doctrines and those of their master. From the time of its appearance this new com- munist doctrine carried an implied criticism of all forms of State socialism from Louis Blanc to Las- salle. This State socialism, although mingled with revolutionary doctrines, was then summed up in the empty dream, in the abracadabra, of the Right to Work. This is an insidious formula if it implies a demand addressed to a government even of revolu- tionary bourgeois. It is an economic absurdity if by it is meant to suppress the unemployment which ensues upon the variations of wages, that is to say upon the conditions of competition. It may be a tool for politicians, if it serves as an expedient to calm ' a shapeless mass of unorganized proletarians. This is very evident for any one who conceives clearly the course of a victorious proletarian revolution which cannot proceed to the socialization of the means of production by taking possession of them, that is to say, which cannot arrive at the economic form in which there is neither merchandise nor wage labor and in which the right to work and the duty of working are one and the same, mingled in the common necessity of labor for all. The mirage of the right to work ended in the tragedy of June. The parliamentary discussion of which it was the object in the sequel was nothing but a parody. Lamartine, that tearful rhetorician, 40 IN MEMORY OF THE that great man for all proper occasions, had pro- nounced the last, or the next to the last of his cele- brated phrases, "Catastrophes are the experiences of nations," and that sufficed for the irony of his- tory. The brevity and simplicity of the Manifesto were wholly foreign to the insinuating rhetoric of faith or creed. It was of the utmost inclusiveness by virtue of the many ideas which it for the first time reduced to a system and it was a series of germs capable of an immense development. But it was not, and it did not pretend to be a code of socialism, a catechism of critical communism, or the handbook of the proletarian revolution. We may leave its "quintessence" to the illustrious Dr. Schaeffle, to whom also we willingly leave the famous phrase, "The social question is a question of the stomach." The "ventre" of Dr. Schaeffle has for long years cut a fine enough figure in the world to the great advantage of the dilettanti in socialism and to the delight of the politicians. Critical communism, in reality, scarcely begun with the Manifesto it needed to develop and it has developed effectively. The sum total of the teachings customarily de- signated by the name of "Marxism" did not arrive at maturity before the years 1860-1870. It is cer- tainly a long step from the little work Wage Labor and Capital* in which is seen for the first time in * This is made up of articles which appeared in 1849 in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung and which reproduced the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 41 precise terms how from the purchase and the use of the labor-commodity is obtained a product su- perior to the cost of production, this being the clue to the question of surplus value — it is a long step from this to the complex and multiple develop- ments of "Capital." This book goes exhaustively into the genesis of the bourgeois epoch in all its inner economic structure, and intellectually it trans- scends that epoch because it explains its course, its particular laws and the antitheses which it organi- cally produces and which organically dissolve it. It is a long step also from the proletarian move- ment which succumbed in 1848 to the present pro- letarian movement which through great difficulties after having re-appeared on the political scene has developed with continuity and deliberation. Until a few years ago this regularity of the forward march of the proletariat was observed and admired only in Germany. The social democracy there had nor- mally increased as upon its own field (from the Workingmen's Conference of Nuremburg, 1868, to our day). But' since then the same phenomenon has asserted itself in other countries, under various forms. In this broad development of Marxism and in this increase of the proletarian movement in the limited forms of political action, has there not been, as some assert, an alteration from the militant char- lectures given by Marx to the German Workingmen's Cir- cle of Brussels in 1847. It has since been published as a propaganda leaflet. 42 IN MEMORY OF THE acter of the original form of critical communism? Has there not been a passing from revolution to the self-styled evolution? Has there not been an ac- quiescence of the revolutionary spirit in the exi- gencies of the reform movement? These reflections and these objections have arisen and arise continually both among the most en- thusiastic and most passionate of the socialists and among the adversaries of socialism whose interest it is to give an appearance of uniformity to the special defeats, checks and delays, so as to affirm that communism has no future. Whoever compares the present proletarian move- ment and its varied and complicated course with the impression left by the Manifesto when one reads it without being provided with knowledge from other sources, may easily believe that there was something juvenile and premature in the confident boldness of those communists of fifty years ago. There is in them the sound as of a battle cry and an echo of the vibrant eloquence of some of the ora- tors of Chartism ; there is the declaration of a new '93 with no room left for a new Thermidor. And Thermidor has re-appeared several times since in various forms, more or less explicit or dis- guised, and their authors have been since 1848 French ex-radicals, or Italian ex-patriots, or Ger- man bureaucrats, adorers of the god State and prac- tically slaves of the god Mammon, English parlia- mentarians broken by the artifices of the art of gov- COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 43 eminent, or even politicians under the guise of anar- chists. Many people believe that the constellation of Thermidor is destined never to disappear from the heaven of history, or to speak in a more prosaic fashion, that liberalism, that is to say a society where men are equal only in law, marks the extreme limit of human evolution beyond which nothing remains but a return backward. That is the opinion of all those who see in the progressive extension of the bourgeois form over the whole world the reason and the end of all progress. Whether they are opti- mists or pessimists here are, for them, the columns of Hercules of the human race. Often it happens that this sentiment in its pessimistic form operates unconsciously upon some of those, who with others unclassified, go to swell the ranks of anarchism. There are others who go further and who theorize upon the objective improbabilities of the assertions of critical communism. That affirmation of the Manifesto that the reduction of all class struggles to a single one carries within itself the necessity of the proletarian revolution, would seem to them in- trinsically false. That doctrine would be without foundation because it assumes to draw a theoretical deduction and a practical rule of conduct from the prevision of a fact which, according to these adver- saries, would be a simple theoretical point which might'be displaced and set ahead indefinitely. The assumed inevitable collision between the productiv? forces and the form of production would never take place because it is reduced, as they claim, to an in- 44 IN MEMORY OF THE finite number of particular cases of friction, because it multiplies itself into the partial collisions of econo- mic competition, and because it meets with checks and hindrances in the expedients and attacks of the governmental art. In other words, our present so- ciety, instead of breaking up and dissolving would in a continuous fashion repair the evils which it produced. Every proletarian movement which is not repressed by violence as was that of June, 1848, and that of May, 1871, would perish of slow ex- haustion as happened with Chartism which ended in trade unionism, the war horse of this fashion of arguing, the honor and glory of the economists and of the vulgar sociologists. Every modern prole- tarian movement would be regarded as meteoric and not organic, it would be a disturbance and not a process, and according to these critics, in spite of ourselves, we should be still Utopians. The historic forecast which is found in the doc- trine of the Manifesto and which critical communism has since developed by a broad and detailed analy- sis of the actual world, has certainly taken on by reason of the circumstances in which it was pro- duced a warlike appearance and a very aggressive form. But it did not imply, any more than it im- pies now, either a chronological datum or a pro- phetic picture of the social organization like those in the apocalypses and the ancient prophesies. The heroic Father Dolcino did not re-appear with the prophetic war cry of Joachino del Fiore. We COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 45 did not celebrate anew at Munster the resurrection of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. There were no more Taborites nor millenarians. Nor was there another Fourier waiting in his house at a fixed hour year after year for the "candidate of humanity." Nor again, was there an initiator of a new life, beginning with artificial means to create the first nucleus of an association proposing to make man over, as was the case with Beller, Owen, Cabet, and the enter- prise of the Fourierites in Texas, which was the tomb of utopianism, marked by a singular epitaph : the dumbness which succeeded the fiery eloquence of Considerant. Neither is there here a sect which retires modestly and timidly from the world in order to celebrate in a closed circle the perfect idea of communism as in the socialist colonies of America. Here, on the contrary, in the doctrine of critical communism, it is society as a whole which at a mo- ment of its general process discovers the cause of its destined course and at a critical point asserts it- self to proclaim the laws of its movement. The foresight indicated by the Manifesto was not chrono- logical, it was not a prophecy nor a promise, but a morphological prevision. Beneath the noise of the passions over which our daily conversation extends itself, beyond the visible movements of the persons who formed the material at which the historians stop, beyond the juridical and political apparel of our civil society, far enough from the meanings which religion and art give to 46 IN MEMORY OF THE life, there remains, grows and develops the elemen- tary structure of society which supports all the rest. The anatomical study of this underlying structure is economics. And as human society has several times changed, partially or entirely, in its most visible ex- terior form, or in its ideological, religious or artis- tic manifestations, we must first find the cause and the reason of these changes, the only ones which his- torians relate, in the transformations more hidden, and at first less visible, of the economic processus of this structure. We must set ourselves to the study of the differences which exist between the various forms of production when we have to deal with historic epochs clearly distinct and properly designated ; and when we have to explain the suc- cession of these forms, the replacing of one by the other, we must study the causes of erosion, and of the destruction of the form which disappears; and finally when we wish to understand the historic fact determined and concrete, we must study the frictions and the contrasts which take their rise from the dif- ferent currents, that is to say, the classes, their sub- divisions and their intersections which characterize a given society. When the Manifesto declared that all history up to the present time has been nothing but the history of class struggles and that these are the cause of all revolutions as also of all reactions, it did two things at the same time, it gave to communism the elements of a new doctrine and to the communists the guid- ing thread to discover in the confused events of poli- COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 47 tical life the conditions of the underlying economic movement. In these last fifty years the generic foresight of a new historic era has become for socialists the deli- cate art of understanding in every case what it is expedient to do, because this new era is in itself in continual formation. Communism has became an art because the proletarians have become, or are on the point of becoming, a political party. The revo- lutionary spirit is embodied to-day in the proletarian organization. The desired union of communists and proletarians is henceforth an accomplished fact.* These last fifty years have been the ever stronger proof of the ever growing revolt of the producing forces against the forms of production. We "Uto- pians" have no other answer to offer than this les- son from events to those who still speak of meteoric disturbances which, as they would have it, will dis- appear little by little and will all resolve themselves into the calm of this final epoch of civilization. And this lesson suffices. Eleven years after the publication of the Mani- festo, Marx formulated in clear and precise fashion the directing principles of the materialistic interpre- tation of history in the preface to a book which is the forerunner of "Capital." f * See Chapter II. of the Manifesto. tZur Kritik der politischen Oekonomie, Berlin, 1859, pp. IV.-VI. of the preface. (Instead of retranslating this extract from the French I have availed myself of the as- 48 IN MEMORY OF THE "The first work which I undertook for the pur- pose of solving the doubts which perplexed me was a critical re-examination of Hegel's Philosophy of Law. The introduction to this work appeared in the German-French Year Books, published in Paris in 1844. My investigation ended in the conviction that legal relations and forms of government cannot be explained either by themselves or by the so-called general development of the human mind, but on the contrary, have their roots in the conditions of man's physical existence, whose totality Hegel, following the English and French writers of the eighteenth century, summed up under the name of civil society ; and that the anatomy of civil society must be sought in political economy. The study of the latter which I began at Paris .was continued at Brussels whither I had betaken myself in consequence of an order of Guizot expell- ing me from France. The general result which I arrived at and which, once obtained, served as a guide for my subsequent studies, can be briefly formulated as follows : In making their livelihood together men enter into certain necessary involuntary relations with each other, industrial relations which correspond to whatever stage society has reached in the develop- ment of its material productive forces. The totality of these industrial relations consti- sistance of Comrade Hitch, who has translated direct from the German of Marx. C. H. K.) COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 49 tutes the economic structure of society, the real basis upon which the legal and political superstruc- ture is built, and to which definite forms of social consciousness correspond. The method of producing the material liveli- hood determines the social, political and intellectual life process in general. It is not men's consciousness which determines their life ; on the contrary, it is their social life which determines their consciousness. At a certain stage of their development the ma- terial productive forces of society come into con- flict with the old conditions of production or, to use a kgal expression, with the old property relations under which these forces have hitherto been exerted. From forms of development of the productive forces these relations turn into fetters of production. Then begins an epoch of social revolution. With the change of the economic basis the whole vast super- structure undergoes sooner or later a revolution. In considering such revolutions one must con- stantly distinguish between the industrial revolu- tion, to be carefully posited scientifically, which takes place in the economic conditions of produc- tion, and the legal, political, religious, artistic or philosophical, in short ideological, forms wherein men become conscious of this conflict and fight it out. As little as we judge an individual by what he himself thinks he is, just as little can we judge such a revolutionary epoch by its own consciousness. We must rather explain this consciousness out of the 50 IN MEMORY OF THE antagonisms of men's industrial life, out of the con- flict existing between the forces of social produc- tion and the relations of social production. A form of society never breaks down until all the productive forces are developed for which it affords room. New and higher relations of produc- tion are never established, until the material condi- tions of life to support them have been prepared in the lap of the old society itself. Therefore mankind always sets for itself only such tasks as it is able to perform ; for upon close examination it will always be found that the task itself only arises where the material conditions for its solution are already at hand or are at least in process of growth. We may in broad outlines characterize the Asi- atic, the antique, the feudal and the modern capital- ist methods of production as progressive epochs in the economic evolution of society. The industrial relations arising out of the capital- istic method of production constitute the last of the antagonistic forms of social production; antagonis- tic not in the sense of an individual antagonism, but of an antagonism growing out of the social condi- tions of individuals. But the productive forces which are developed in the lap of capitalistic society create at the same time the material conditions needed for the abolition of this antagonism. The capitalist form of society, therefore, brings to a close this prelude to the his- tory of human society." COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 51 Marx had some years before left the political arena and he did not return to it until later with the International. The reaction had triumphed in Italy, Austria, Hungary and Germany over the patriotic, liberal or democratic revolution. The bourgeoisie on its side had overcome the proletarians of France and England. The indispensable conditions far the development of a democratic and proletarian move- ment suddenly disappeared. The battalion small in numbers indeed of the Manifesto communists who had taken part in the revolution and who had partici-' pated in all the acts of resistance and popular rebel- lion against reaction saw its activity crushed by the memorable process of Cologne. The survivors of the movement tried to make a new start at London, but soon Marx, Engels and others separated them- selves from the revolutionaries and retired from the movement. The crisis was passed. A long period of repose followed. This was shown by the slow disappearance of the Chartist movement, that is to say, the proletarian movement of the country which was the spinal column of the capitalist system. His- tory had for the moment discredited the illusions of the revolutionaries. Before giving himself almost entirely to the long incubation of the already discovered elements of the critique of political economy, Marx illustrated in several works the history of the revolutionary period from 1848 to 1850 and especially the class strug- gles in France, showing thus that if the revolution in the forms which it had taken on at that moment had 52 IN MEMORY OF THE not succeeded, the revolutionary theory of history was not contradicted for all that.* The suggestions given in the Manifesto found here their complete development. Later the 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonapartef was the first attempt to apply the new conception of history to a series of facts contained within precise limits of time. It is extremely difficult to rise from the apparent movement to the real movement of his- tory and to discover their intimate connection. There are indeed great difficulties in rising from the phe- nomena of passion, oratory, Parliaments, elections and the like to the inner social gearing to discover in the latter the different interests of the large and small bourgeois, of the peasants, the artisans, the laborers, the priests, the soldiers, the bankers, the usurers and the mob. All these interests act con- sciously or unconsciously, jostling each other, elim- inating each other, combining and fusing, in the dis- cordant life of civilized man. The crisis was passed and this was precisely true in the countries which constituted the historic field from which critical communism proceeded. All * These articles which appeared in the Neue Rheinische Politischokonomische Review, Hamburg, 1850, have re- cently been brought together into a pamphlet by Engels (Berlin, 1895) under the title of "Die Klassenkampfe in Frankreich 1848 bis 1850." The little work has a preface by Engels. t Appeared for the first time in New York in 1852 in a review. Several editions have since been made in Ger- many. A French translation appeared in 1891 published by Delory, Lille. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 53 that the critical communists could do was to under- stand the reaction in its hidden economic causes because, for the moment, to understand the reac- tion was to continue the work of the revolution. The same thing happened under other conditions and other forms 20 years later when Marx, in the name of the International made in the "Civil War in France" an apology for the Commune which was at the same time its objective criticism. The heroic resignation with which Marx after 1850 abandoned political life was shown again when he retired from the International after the congress at the Hague in 1872. These two facts have their value for biography because they give glimpses of his personal character. With him, in fact, ideas, temperament, policy and thought were one and the same. But, on the other hand, these facts have a much greater bearing for us. Critical communism does not manufacture revolutions, it does not pre- pare insurrections, it does not furnish arms for re- volts. It mingles itself with the proletarian move- ment, but it sees and supports that movement in the full intelligence of _ the connection which it has, which it can have, and which it must have, with all the relations of social life as a whole. In a word it is not a seminary in which superior officers of the proletarian revolution are trained, but it is neither more nor less than the consciousness of this revolu- tion and especially the consciousness of its difficul- ties. 54 IN MEMORY OF THE The proletarian movement has grown in a colossal fashion during these last thirty years. In the midst of numberless difficulties, through gains and losses, it has little by little taken on a political form. Its methods have been elaborated and gradually applied. All this is not the work of the magic action of the doctrine scattered by the persuasive virtue of writ- ten and spoken propaganda. From their first be- ginnings the communists had this feeling that they were the extreme left of every proletarian move- ment, but in proportion as the latter developed and specialized it became their necessity and duty to as- sist, (through the elaboration of programmes, and through their participation in the political action of the parties) in the various contingencies of the econ- omic development and of the political situation growing out of it. In the fifty years which separate us from the pub- lication of the Manifesto the specialization and the complexity of the proletarian movement have be- come such that there is henceforth no mind capable of embracing it in its completeness, of understand- ing it in its details and grasping its real causes and exact relations. The single International, from 1864 to 1873, necessarily disappeared after it had fulfilled its task. The preliminary equalization of the general tendencies and of the ideas common and indispensable to all the proletariat, and no one can assume or will assume to re-constitute anything like it. Two causes, notably, contributed in a high de- COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 55 gree to this specialization, this complexity of the proletarian movement. In many countries the bour- geoisie felt the need of putting an end in the inter- est of its own defense to some of the abuses which had arisen in consequence of the introduction of the industrial system. Thence arose labor legislation, or as it has been pompously called social legislation. This same bourgeoisie in its own interest or, under the pressure of circumstances has been obliged, in many countries to increase the generic conditions of liberty, and notably to extend the right of suffrage. These two circumstances have drawn the proletariat into the circle of daily political life. They have con- siderably increased its chance for action and the agility and suppleness thus acquired permit it to struggle with the bourgeoisie in elective assembles. And as the processus of things determines the pro- cessus of ideas, this practical multiform development of the proletariat is accompanied by a gradual de- velopment of the doctrines of critical communism, as well in the manner of understanding history or con- temporary life as in the minute description of the most infinitesimal parts of economics: in a word, it has become a science. Have we not there, some ask, a deviation from the simple and imperative doctrine of the Manifesto? Others again say, have we not lost in intensity and precision what we have gained in extension and complexity ? These questions, in my opinion, arise from an in- 56 IN MEMORY OF THE exact conception of the present proletarian move- ment and an optical illusion as to the degree of en- ergy and revolutionary valor of the former move- ments. Whatever be the concessions that the bourgeoisie can make in the present economic order even if it be a very great reduction in the hours of labor, it al- ways remains true that the necessity for exploitation upon which the whole present social order rests im- poses limits beyond which capital as a private in- strument of production has no more reason for ex- istence. If a concession to-day can allay one form of discontent in the proletariat, the concession itself can do nothing less than to give rise to the need of new and ever increasing concessions. The need of labor legislation arose in England before the Chart- ist movement and it developed afterwards along with it. It had its first successes in the period which immediately followed the fall of Chartism. The principles and the reasons of this movement in their causes and their effects were studied in a critical manner by Marx in Capital and they afterwards passed, through the International, into the pro- grammes of the different socialist parties. Finally this whole process, concentrating itself into the de- mand for eight hours, became with the ist of May an international marshalling of the proletariat, and a means for estimating its progress. On the other hand, the political struggle in which the proletariat takes part democratizes its habits ; still more a real COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 57 democracy takes birth which, with time, will no longer be able to adapt itself to the present political form. Being the organ of a society based on ex- ploitation it is constituted as a bureaucratic hier- archy, as a judicial bureaucracy and a mutual aid society of the capitalists for the defense of their special privileges, the perpetual income from the public debt, the rent of land and the interest on capi- tal in all its forms. Consequently the two facts, which according to the discontented and the hyper- critical seem to make us deviate infinitely from the lines laid down by communism, become, on the con- trary, new means and new conditions which con- firm these lines. The apparent deviations from the revolution are, at bottom, the very thing which is hastening it. Moreover, we must not exaggerate the signifi- cance of the revolutionary faith of the communists of fifty years ago. Given the political situation of Europe, if they had a faith, it was that they were precursors, and this they have been ; they hoped that the political conditions of Italy, Austria, Hungary, Germany and Poland might approximate to modern forms, and this has happened later, in part, and through other means; if they had a hope, it was that the proletarian movement of France and Eng- land might continue to develop. The reaction which intervened upset many things and stopped more than one development which had already begun. It upset also the old revolutionary tactic, and in these 58 IN MEMORY OF THE last years a new tactic has arisen. Therein lies all the change.* The Manifesto was designed for nothing else than the first guiding thread to a science and a practice which nothing but experience and time could de- velop. It gives only the scheme and the rhythm of the general march of the proletarian movement. It is perfectly evident that the communists were influenced by the experience of the two movements which they had before their eyes, that of France, and especially the Chartist movement which the mani- festation of April ioth was soon to strike with par- alysis. But this scheme does not fix in any invari- able fashion a tactic of war, which indeed had al- ready been made frequently. The revolutionists had often indeed explained in the form of catechism what ought to be a simple consequence of the devel- opment of events This scheme became more vast and complex with the development and extension of the bourgeois sys- tem. The rhythm of the movement has become more varied and slower because the laboring mass has entered on the scene as a distinct, political party, which fact changes the manner and the measure of their action and consequently their movement. * In the preface to the "Class Struggle in France in 1848-50" and elsewhere Engels treated fundamentally the objective development of the new revolutionary tactic. (It is well to remember that the first Italian edition of this essay appeared June 18th, and the second, October 15, 1895.) COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 59 Just as in view of the improvement of modern weapons the tactic of street riots has become inop- portune, and just as the complexity of the modern state shows the insufficiency of a sudden capture of a municipal government to. impose upon a whole people the will and the ideas of a minority, no mat- ter how courageous and progressive, even so, on its side, the mass of the proletarians no longer holds to the word of command of a few leaders, nor does it regulate its movements by the instructions of cap- tains who might upon the ruins of one government raise up another. The laboring mass where it has developed politically has made and is making its own democratic education. It is choosing its repre- sentatives and submitting their action to its criti- cism. It examines and makes its own the ideas and the propositions which these representatives sub- mit to it. It already knows, or it begins to under- stand according to the situation in the various coun- tries, that the conquest of the political power cannot and should not be made by others in its name, and especially that it cannot be the consequence of a single blow. In a word it knows, or it is beginning to understand that the dictatorship of the proletariat which shall have for its task the socialization of the means of production cannot be the work of a mass led by a few and that it must be, and that it will be, the work of the proletarians themselves when they have become in themselves and through long prac- tice a political organization The development and the extension of the bour- 60 IN MEMORY OF THE geois system have been rapid and colossal in these last fifty years. It already invades sacred and an- cient Russia and it is creating, not only in America, Australia and in India, but even in Japan, new cen- ters of modern production, thus complicating the conditions of competition and the entanglements of the world market. The consequences of political changes have been produced, or will not be long to wait for. Equally rapid and colossal has been the progress of the proletariat. Its political education takes each day a new step toward the conquest of political power. The rebellion of the productive forces against the form of production, the struggle of living labor against accumulated labor, becomes every day more evident. The bourgeois system is henceforth upon the defensive and it reveals its de- cadence by this singular contradiction ; the peaceful world of industry has become a colossal camp in which militarism develops. The peaceful period of industry has become by the irony of things the pe- riod of the continuous invention of new engines of war. Socialism has forced itself into the situation. Those semi-socialists, even those charlatans who encumber with their presence the press and the meetings of our party and who often are a nuisance to us, are a tribute which vanity and ambitions of every sort render in their fashion to the new power which rises on the horizon. In spite of the foreseen antidote which scientific socialism is, the truth of which many people have not come to understand, COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 61 there is a group of quacks on the social question, all having some particular specific to eliminate such or such a social evil : land nationalization, monopoly of grains in the hands of the State, democratic taxes, statization of mortgages, general strike, etc. But social democracy eliminates all these fantasies be- cause the consciousness of their situation leads the proletarians when once they have become familiar with the political arena to understand socialism in an integral fashion. They come to understand that they should look for only one thing, the abolition of wage labor; that there is but one form of society which renders possible and even necessary the elim- ination of classes, — the association which does not produce commodities, and that this form of society is no longer the State, but its opposite, that is to say, the technical and pedagogical administration of hu- man society, the self-government of labor. Behind the Jacobins are the gigantic heroes of 1793 and their caricatures of 1848. Social democracy ! But is not that, say some, an evident attenuation of the communist doctrine as it is formulated in the Manifesto in terms so ringing and so decisive ? This is not the moment to recall that the phrase social democracy has had in France many significa- tions from 1837 to x 848, all of which were based upon a vague sentimentalism. Neither is it neces- sary to explain how the Germans have been, able in this nomenclature to sum up all the rich and vast de- 62 IN MEMORY OF THE velopment of their socialism from the episode of Lassalle now passed over and transformed up to our own days. It is certain that social democracy can signify, has signified and signifies many things which have not been, are not, and never will be, either critical communism or the conscious march toward the proletarian revolution. It is also certain that contemporary socialism even in the countries where its development is most advanced, carries with it a great deal of dross which it throws off little by little along the road. It is certain also, in fine, that this broad designation of social democracy serves as an escutcheon and a buckler to many in- truders. But here we need to fix our attention only upon certain points of capital importance. We must insist upon the second term of the ex- pression in order to avoid any equivocation. Demo- cratic was the constitution of the Communist League; democratic was its fashion of welcoming and discussing each new teaching; democratic was its intervention in the revolution of 1848 and its participation in the rebellious resistance against the invasion of reaction; democratic finally was the very way in which the League was dissolved. In this first type of our present parties, in this first cell so to speak, of our complex organism, elastic and highly developed, there was not only the conscious- ness of the mission to be accomplished as precursor, but there was already the form and the method of association which alone are suitable for the first ini- tiators of the proletarian revolution. It was no COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 63 longer a sect ; that form was already, in fact, out- grown. The immediate and fantastic domination of the individual was eliminated, what predominated was a discipline which had its source in the experi- ence of necessity and in the precise doctrine which must proceed from the reflex consciousness of this necessity. It was the same with the International, which appeared authoritarian only to those who could not make their own authority prevail in it. It must be the same, and it is so, in the working class parties and where this character is not or cannot yet be marked, the proletarian agitation still elementary and confused simply engenders illusions and is only a pretext for intrigues, and when it is not so, then we have a passover where men of understanding touch elbows with the madman and the spy ; as for example the society of The International Brothers which attached itself like a parasite to the Interna- tional and discredited it; or again the co-operative which degenerates into a business and sells itself to capitalists; the labor party which remains outside politics and which studies the variations of the mar- ket to introduce its tactic of strikes into the sinuos- ities of competition; or again a group of malcon- tents, for the most part social outcasts and little bourgeois, who give themselves up to speculations on socialism considered as one of the phases of po- litical fashion. Social democracy has met all these" impedimenta upon its way and it has been obliged to relieve itself of them as it will have to do again from one time to another. The art of persuasion 64 IN MEMORY OF THE does not always suffice. Oftener it was necessary and it is necessary to resign ourselves and wait until the hard school of disillusion serves to instruct, which it does better than reasonings can do. All these intrinsic difficulties of the proletarian movement, which the wily bourgeoisie oftener than not stirs up of itself and which it makes the most of, form a considerable part of the internal history of socialism during these last years. Socialism has not found impediments merely in the general conditions of economic competition and in the resistance of the political power, but also in the very conditions of the proletarian mass and in the mechanism sometimes obscure although inevi- table of its slow, varied, complex movements, often antagonistic and contradictory. That prevents many people from seeing the increasing reduction of all class struggles to the single struggle between the capitalists and the proletarianized workers. Even as the Manifesto did not write, as the Uto- pians did, the ethics and the psychology of the fu- ture society, just so it did not give the mechanism of that formation and of the development in which we find ourselves. It is surely enough that these few pioneers have opened the road. We must walk upon it to arrive at understanding and experience. Moreover man is distinctively the experimental ani- mal ; that is why he has a history, or rather that is why he makes his own history. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 65 Upon this road of contemporary socialism which constitutes its development because it is its experi- ence, we have met the mass of the peasants. Socialism' which at first kept itself practically and theoretically to the study and experience of the an- tagonisms between capitalists and proletarians in the circle of industrial production properly so called, has turned its activity toward that mass in which peasant stupidity blossoms. To capture the peasants is the question of the hour, although the quintessen- tial Schaeffle long ago mobilized the anti-collectivist brains of the peasants for the defense of the existing order. The elimination and the capture of domes- tic industry by capital, the passage more and more rapid of agrarian industry into the capitalist form, the disappearance of small proprietorship, or its lessening through mortgages, the disappearance of the communal domaines, usury, taxes and militar- ism, all this is beginning to work miracles even in those brains assumed to be props of the existing order. The Germans have been the pioneers in this field. They were brought to it by the very fact of their im- mense expansion ; from the cities they have gone to the smallest centers and they thus arrive inevitably at the frontiers of the country. Their attempts will be long and difficult ; this fact explains, excuses, and will excuse, the errors which have been and will be committed.* As long as the peasant shall not be * In my opinion this is the case in France. The recent discussions of the agrarian programme submitted to the 66 IN MEMORY OF THE gained over we shall always have behind us this peasant stupidity which unconsciously repeats, and that because it is stupid, the errors of the 18th Bru- maire and the 2d of December, The development of modern society in Russia will probably proceed on parallel lines with this conquest of the country dis- tricts. When that country shall have entered into the liberal era with all its imperfections and all its disadvantages, with all the purely modern forms of exploitation and of proletarization, but also with the compensations and the advantages of the political development of the proletariat, social democracy will no longer have to fear the threat of unforeseen perils from without, and it will at the same time have triumphed over the internal perils by the capture of the peasants. The example of Italy is instructive. This coun- try after having opened the capitalist era dropped out for several centuries from the current history. It is a typical case of decadence which can be stu- died in a precise fashion from original documents in all its phases. It partly returned into history at the time of the Napoleonic domination. It recon- quered its unity and became a modern state after the period of the reaction and conspiracies, and un- der circumstances known to all, and Italy has ended by having all the vices of parliamentarism, of mili- tarism and of finance without having at the same deliberations of the social democracy in Germany confirm the reasons which I have indicated. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 67 time the forms of modern production and the re- sulting capacity for competition on equal terms. It cannot compete with countries where industry is more advanced by reason of the absolute lack of coal and scarcity of iron, the lack of technical ability, — and it is waiting, or hoping now, that the appli- cation of electricity may permit it to regain the time lost. It is this which gave the impulse to different attempts from Biella to Schio. A modern state in a society almost exclusively agricultural and in a coun- try where agriculture is in great part backward, it is that which gives birth to this general sentiment of universal discontent. Thence come the incoherence and the inconsist- ency of the parties, the rapid oscillations from dema- gogy to dictatorship, the mob, the multitude, the infinite army of the parasites of politics, the makers of fantastic projects. This singular social spectacle of a development prevented, retarded, embarrassed and thus uncertain, is brought out in bold relief by a penetrating spirit which, if it is not always the fruit and the expression of a modern, broad and real cul- ture nevertheless bears within itself as the relic of an excellent civilization the mark of great cerebral refinement. Italy has not been for reasons easy to guess a suitable field for the indigenous forma- tion of socialist ideas and tendencies. The Ital- ian Philippe Buonaroti, at first the friend of the younger Robespierre, become the companion of Ba- beuf and later attempted to re-establish Babeufism in France, after 1830. Socialism made its first appear- 68 IN MEMORY OF THE ance in Italy at the time of the International, in the confused and incoherent form of Bakuninism; it was not, moreover, a labor movement, but it was the work of the small bourgeois and instinctive revo- lutionists.* In these last years socialism has fixed itself in a form which almost reproduces the gen- eral type of social democracy.^ Now in Italy the first sign of life which the proletariat gave is in the shape of the rising of the Sicilian peasants followed by other revolts of the same kind on the continent to which others will perhaps succeed in the future. Is it not very significant? After this incursion into the history of contempo- rary socialism we gladly return to our precursors of fifty years ago, who put on record in the Mani- festo how they took possession of an advance post on the road of progress. And that is true not merely of the theorizers, that is to say, Marx and Engels. Both of these men would have exercised, under other circumstances and at all times either by tongue or pen, a considerable influence over politics and science * It was otherwise in Germany. After 1830 socialism was imported there and became a current literature; it underwent philosophical alterations of which Gruen was the typical representative. But already before the new doctrine socialism had received a characteristic imprint which was proletarian, thanks to the propaganda and the writings of Weitling. As Marx said in 1844 in the Paris Vorwaerts, "it was the giant in the cradle." t It is what many people call Marxism. Marxism is and remains a doctrine. Parties can draw neither their name nor their justification from a doctrine. "I am no Marxist" said — guess who? Marx himself. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 69 such was the force and originality of their minds and the extent of their knowledge even if they had never met on their way the Communist League. But I am referring to all the "unknown" according to the exclusive and vain jargon of bourgeois litera- ture: — of the shoemaker, Bauer, the tailors, Less- ner and Eccarius, the miniature painter, Pfaender, the watchmaker, Moll,* of Lochner, etc., and many others who were the first conscious initiators of our movement. The motto, "Workingmen of all coun- tries, unite," remains as their monument. The pas- sage of socialism from Utopia to science marks the result of their work. The survival of their instinct and of their first impulse in the work of to-day is the ineffaceable title which these precursors have acquired to the gratitude of all socialists. As an Italian, I return so much the more willingly to these beginnings of modern socialism because for me, at least, this recent warning of Engels' is not without importance. "Thus the discovery that ev- erywhere and always political conditions and events find their explanation in economic conditions would not have been made by Marx in 1845, but rather by Loria in 1886. He has at least succeeded in impress- ing this belief upon his compatriots, and since his book has appeared in French even upon some Frenchmen and he may now go on inflated with * It is he who established the first relations between Marx and the League and who served as intermediary in the publication of the Manifesto. He fell in the insurrec- tion of 1849 at Murg. 70 IN MEMORY OF THE pride and vanity as if he had discovered an epoch- making historic theory until the Italian socialists have time to despoil the illustrious Mr. Loria of the peacock feathers which he has stolen.* I would willingly close here, but more remains to be said. On all sides and from all camps protests arise and objections are urged against historical materialism. And some times these voices are swelled here and there by newly converted socialists, socialists who are philosophical, socialists who are sentimental and sometimes hysterical. Then reappears, as a warn- ing, the "question of the belly." Others devote them- selves to exercise of logical gymnastics with ab- stract categories of egoism and altruism ; for others again the inevitable struggle for existence always turns up at the right moment. Morality ! But it is high time that we understand the lesson of this morality of the bourgeois epoch in the fable of the bees by Mandeville, who was con- temporary with the first projection of classic econo- mics. And has not the politics of this morality been ex- * Marx's Capital, Vol. III., Hamburg, 1894, pp. xix- xx. The date of 1845 refers principally to the book "Die heilige Familie, Frankfort, 1845," which was produced in collaboration by Marx and Engels. This book is indis- pensable to an understanding of the theoretical origin of historical materialism. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 71 plained in classic phrases that can never be forgot- ten by the first great political writer of the capitalist epoch Machiavelli, who did not invent Ivlachiavel- lism, but who was its secretary and faithful and dili- gent editor. And as for the logical tourney between egoism and altruism, has it not been in full view from the time of the Reverend Malthus up to that empty, prolix and tiresome reasoner, the indispen- sable Spencer ? Struggle for existence ! But could you wish to observe, study and understand a struggle more important for us than the one which has its birth and is taking on gigantic proportions in the proletarian agitation ? Perhaps you would reduce the explanation of this struggle which is developing and working in the supernatural domain of society, which man himself has created in the course of history, through his labor, through improved pro- cesses and through social institutions, and which man himself can change through other forms of labor, processes and institutions, — you would per- haps reduce it to the simple explanation of the more general struggle in which plant and animals, and men themselves in so far as they are animals, , are contending in the bosom of nature. But let us return to our subject. Critical communism has never refused, and it does not refuse, to welcome the multiple and valua- ble suggestions, ideological, ethical, psychologic and pedagogic which may come from the knowledge and from the study of all forms of communism from 72 IN MEMORY OF THE Phales of Chalcedon down to Cabet* More than this, it is by the study and the knowledge of these forms that the consciousness of the separateness of scientific socialism from all the rest becomes de- veloped and fixed. And in making this study who is there who will refuse to recognize that Thomas More was a heroic soul and a great writer on so- cialism? Who will not find in his heart a large tribute of admiration for Robert Owen who first gave to the ethics of communism this indisputable principle, that the character and the morals of men are the necessary result of the conditions in which they live and of the circumstances which surround them ? And the partisans of critical communism be- lieve it is their duty, traversing history in thought, to claim fellowship with all the oppressed, whatever may have been their destiny, which was that of re- maining oppressed and of opening the way after an ephemeral success for the rule of new oppressors. But the partisans of critical communism differ- entiate themselves clearly on one point from all other forms or manners of communism, or of socialism, ancient, modern or contemporaneous, and this point is of capital importance. They cannot admit that the ideologies of the past have remained without effect and that the past at- tempts of the proletariat have been always over- come by pure chance, by pure accident, by the effect * I stop with Cabet who lived at the epoch of the Mani- festo. I do not think I ought to go as far as the sporadic forms of Bellamy and Hertzka. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 73 of a caprice of circumstances. All these ideologies although they reflected in fact the sentiment directly- due to social antitheses, that is to say, the real class struggles, with a lofty sense of justice and a pro- found devotion to an ideal, nevertheless all reveal ignorance of the true causes and of the effective na- ture of the antitheses against which they hurled themselves by an act of revolt spontaneous and often heroic. Thence their Utopian character. We can moreover explain why the oppressive conditions of other epochs although they were more barbarous and cruel did not bring that accumulation of energy, that concentration of force, or that continuity of resist- ance which is seen to be realizing itself and develop- ing in the proletariat of our time. It is the change of society in its economic structure ; it is the forma- tion of the proletariat in the bosom of the great in- dustry and of the modern state. It is the appear- ance of the proletariat upon the political scene, — it is the new things, in fine, which have engendered the need of new ideas. Thus critical communism is neither moralizer, nor preacher, nor herald, nor Utopian — it already holds the thing itself in its hands and into the thing itself it has put its ethics and its idealism. This orientation which seems harsh to the senti- mentalists because it is too true, too realistic and too real, permits us to retrace the history of the prole- tariat and of the other oppressed classes which pre- ceded it. We see their different phases ; we take ac- count of the failures of Chartism, of the Conspiracy 74 IN MEMORY OF THE of Equals and we explore still further back to at- tempts at relief, to acts of resistance, and to wars, — to the famous peasants' war in Germany, to the Jacquerie and to Father Dolcino. In all these facts and in all these events we discover forms and phe- nomena relating to the future of the bourgeoisie in proportion as it tears to pieces, overthrows, triumphs over and issues from the feudal system. We can do the same with the class struggles of the ancient world but with less clearness. This history of the proletariat and of the other oppressed classes, of the vicissitudes of their struggles and their revolts, is al- ready a sufficient guide to assist us in understanding why the ideologies of the communism of other epochs were premature. If the bourgeoisie has not yet arrived everywhere at the final stage of its evolution, it surely has ar- rived in certain countries at its accomplishment. In fact, in the most advanced countries it is subjecting the various older forms of production, either directly or indirectly, to the action and to the law of capital. And thus it simplifies, or it tends to simplify, the dif- ferent class struggles of former times, which then obscured each other by their multiplicity, into this single struggle between capital which is converting into merchandise all the products of human labor indispensable to life and the mass of proletarians which sells its labor power,— now also become simple merchandise. The secret of history is simplified. It is all prosaic. And just as the present class strug- gle is the simplification of all other, so likewise, the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 75 communism of the Manifesto simplifies into rigid and general theoretical formulas the ideologic, ethic, psychologic and pedagogic suggestion of the other forms of communism not by denying but by exalting them. All is prosaic and communism itself partakes of this character, it is now a science. Thus there are in the Manifesto neither rhetoric nor protestations. It does not lament over pauper- ism to eliminate it. It sheds tears over nothing. The tears are transformed of themselves into a spon- taneous revolutionary force. Ethics and idealism consist henceforth in this, to put the thought of science at the service of the proletariat. If this ethics does not appear moral enough for the senti- mentalists, usually hysterical and silly, let them go and borrow altruism from its high priest Spencer who will give a vague and insipid definition of it, such as will satisfy them. But, again, should the economic factor serve alone to explain the whole of history ! Historic factors ! But that is an expression of empiricists or ideologists who repeat Herder. So- ciety is a complex whole or an organism according to the expression of some who waste their time in discussions over the value and the analogical use of this expression. This complexus has formed itself and has changed several times. What is the explan- ation of this change? Even long before Feuerbach gave a final blow to the theological explanation of history (man makes 76 IN MEMORY OF THE religion and not religion man) the old Balzac* had made a satire of it by making men the puppets of God. And had not Vico already recognized that Providence does not act in history from without? And this same Vico, a century before Morgan, had he not reduced history to a process which man him- self makes through successive experimentation con- sisting in the invention of language, religion, cus- toms and laws ? Had not Lessing affirmed that his- tory is an education of the human race? Had not Rousseau seen that ideas are born from needs ? Had not Saint Simon guessed when he did not lose him- self in the distinction between organic and inor- ganic epochs the real genesis of the Third Estate, and did not his ideas translated into prose make of Augustin Thierry a reconstructor of historical re- seach? In the first fifty years of this century and notably in the period from 1830 to 1850 the class struggles which the ancient historians and those of Italy during the Renaissance had described so clear- ly, instructed by the experience of these struggles in the narrow domain of their own urban republic had grown and had reached on both sides of the Chan- nel greater proportions and an evidence always more palpable. Born in the midst of the great industry, illuminated by the recollection and by the study of the French Revolution they have become intuitively instructive because they found with more or less clearness and consciousness their actual and sug- gested expression in the programmes of the politi- * The Balzac of the 17th century. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 77 cal parties : free exchange or tariffs on grain in England, and so on. The conception of history changed to the observer in France, on the right wing as on the left wing of the literary parties, from Guizot to Louis Blanc and to the modest Cabet. Sociology was the need of the time and if it sought in vain its theoretic expression in Auguste Comte, a belated scholastic, it found its artist in Balzac who was the actual inventor of class psychology. To put into the classes and into their frictions the real subject of history and the movement of this in their movement, — this is what was then on the point of being studied and discovered, and it was necessary to fix a theory of this in precise terms. Man has made his history not by a metaphorical evolution nor with a view of walking on a line of preconceived progress. He has made it by creating his own conditions, that is to say, by creating through his labor an artificial environment, by de- veloping successively his technical aptitudes and by accumulating and transforming the products of his activity in this new environment. We have but one single history and we cannot compare real his- tory, which is actually made, with another which is simply possible. Where shall we find the laws of this formation and of this development? The very ancient formations are not evident at first sight. But bourgeois society because it is born recently and has not yet reached its full development, even in all parts of Europe, bears within itself the embryonic traces of its origin and its processus, and it puts 78 IN MEMORY OF THE them in full evidence in countries where it is in pro- cess of birth before our eyes, as for example, in Japan. In so far as it is society which transforms all the products of human labor into commodities by means of capital, society which assumes the proleta- riat or creates it and which bears within itself the anxiety, the trouble and the uncertainty of continu- ous innovations, it is born in determined times ac- cording to clear methods which can be indicated although they may be varied. In fact in different countries it has different modes of development. In Italy, for example, it begins before all the others and then stops. In England it is the product of three centuries of economic expropriation of the old forms of production, or of the old proprietorship, to speak the language of the jurists. In one country it elabo- rates itself little by little combining itself with pre- existing forces, as was the case in Germany, and it undergoes their influences through adaptation ; in another country it breaks its envelope and crushes out resistance violently, as happened in France, where the great revolution gives us the most in- tense and the most bewildering example of historic action that is known, and thus forms the greatest school of sociology. As I have already indicated this formation of modern or bourgeois history has been summed up in rapid and masterly strokes in the Manifesto, which has given its general anatomical profile with its suc- cessive aspects, the trade guild, commerce, manufac- ture and the great industry and has also indicated COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 79 some of the organs and appliances of a derived and complex character, law, political forms, etc. The elements of the theory which was to explain his- tory by the principle of the class struggle were al- ready implicitly contained in it. This same bourgeois society which revolutionized the earlier forms of production had thrown light upon itself and its processus in creating the doctrine of its structure, economics. In fact it has not devel- oped in the unconsciousness which characterized primitive societies but in the full light of the mod- ern world beginning with the Renaissance. Economics, as is known, was born by fragments, and its origin was associated with that of the first bourgeoisie, which was that of commerce and the great geographical discoveries, that is to say, it was contemporary with the first and second phases of mercantilism. And it was born to answer special questions : for example, is interest legitimate ? Is it advantageous for states and for nations to accu- mulate money? It continued to grow, it occupied itself with the most complex sides of the problem of wealth ; it developed in the passage from mercantil- ism to manufacture and then more rapidly and more resolutely in the passage from the latter to the great industry. It was the intellectual soul of the bour- geoisie which was conquering society. It had already as discipline almost denned its general lines on the eve of the French Revolution ; it was the sign of thfi rebellion against the old forms of feudalism, the 80 IN MEMORY OF THE guild, privilege, limitations of labor, that is to say- it was the sign of liberty. The theory of "natural right" which developed from the precursors of Gro- tius to Rousseau, Kant, and the Constitution of 93, was nothing else than a duplicate and the ideological complement of economics, to the extent that often the thing and its complement are confounded in one in the mind and in the postulates of writers ; of this we have a typical example in the Physiocrats. In so far as it was a doctrine it separated, dis- tinguished and analyzed the elements and the forms of the processus of production, of circulation and of distribution and reduced them all into categories: money, money capital, interest, profit, land rent, wages, etc. It marched, sure of itself, accumulating its analyses from Petty to Ricardo. The sole mis- tress of the field, it met only rare objections. It started from two hypotheses which it did not take the trouble to justify since they appeared so evident; namely, that the social order which it illustrated was the natural order, and that private property in the means of production was one and the same thing with human liberty ; all of which made wage labor and the inferiority of the wage laborers into neces- sary conditions. In other terms, it did not recognize the historic character of the forms which it studied. The antitheses which it met on its way in its at- tempt at systematization, after several vain attempts it tried to eliminate logically as was the case with Ricardo in his struggle against the income from land rents. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 81 The beginning of the nineteenth century is marked by violent crises and by those first labor movements which have their immediate origin in the distress attending lockouts. The ideal of the "nat- ural order" is overthrown. Wealth has engendered poverty. The great industry in changing all social relations has increased vices, maladies and subjec- tion. It has, in a word, caused degeneration. Prog- ress has engendered retrogression. What must be done that progress may engender nothing else but progress, that is to say, prosperity, health, security, education and intellectual development equal for all? With this question Owen is wholly concerned and he shares with Fourier and Saint Simon this char- acteristic that he no longer appeals to self-sacrifice and to religion, and that he wishes to resolve and surmount the social antitheses without diminishing the technical and industrial energy of man, but rather to increase this. It is by this road that Owen became a communist and he is the first who became so in the environment created by modern industry. The antithesis rests entirely on the contradiction be- tween the mode of production and the mode of dis- tribution. This antithesis must, then, be suppressed in a society which produces collectively. Owen be- comes Utopian. This perfect society must needs be realized experimentally and to this he devotes him- self with a heroic constancy and unequalled self- sacrifice bringing a mathematical precision even into his thoughts of its details. The antithesis between production and distribu- 82 IN MEMORY OF THE tion once discovered, there arose in England from Thompson to Bra)' a series of writers of a socialism which is not strictly Utopian, but which should be qualified as one-sided for its object is to correct the manifest vices of society by as many appropriate remedies.* In fact the first stage of all those who are on the road toward socialism is the discovery of the con- tradiction between production and distribution. Then, these ingenuous questions immediately arise: Why not abolish poverty ? Why not eliminate lock- outs? Why not suppress the middle man? Why not favor the direct exchange of products in consid- eration of the labor that they contain? Why not give the worker the entire product of his labor, etc. These demands reduce the things, tenacious and re- sistant, of real life, into as many reasonings, and they have for their object to combat the capitalist system as if it were a machine from which one can take away or to which one can add pieces, wheels and gearings. The partisans of critical communism have broken definitely with all these tendencies. They have been the successors and the continuers of classical econ- omics.f What is the doctrine of the structure of present society? No one can combat this structure * It is these writers whom Menger thought he had dis- covered as the authors of scientific socialism. t It is for this reason that certain critics, Wieser for example, propose to abandon Ricardo's theory of value because it leads to socialism. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 83 in practice, in politics or in revolution without first taking an exact account of its elements and its re- lations and making a fundamental study of the doc- trine which explains it. These forms, these ele- ments and these relations arise in certain historic conditions but they constitute a system and a neces- sity. How can it be hoped to destroy such a system by an act of logical negation and how eliminate it by reasoning ? Eliminate pauperism ? But it is a nec- essary condition of capitalism. Give the worker the entire product of his labor? But what would be- come of the profit of capital, and where and how could the money expended in the purchase of com- modities be increased if among all the commodities which it meets and with which it makes exchanges there were not a particular one which returns to the buyer more than it costs him; and is not this commodity precisely the labor power of the wage worker? The economic system is not a tissue of reasonings but it is a sum and a complexus of facts which engenders a complex tissue of relations. It is a foolish thing to assume that this system of facts which the ruling class has established with great pains through the centuries by violence, by sagacity, by talent and by science will confess itself van- quished, will destroy itself to give way to the de- mands of the poor and to the reasonings of their advocates. How demand the suppression of poverty without demanding the overthrow of all the rest? To demand of this society that it shall change its law which constitutes its defense is to demand an 84 IN MEMORY OF THE absurd thing. To demand of this State that it shall cease to be the buckler and the defense of this so- ciety and of this law is plunging into absurdities.* The one-sided socialism which without being clear- ly Utopian starts from the hypothesis that society ad- mits of certain errata without revolution, that is to say without a fundamental change in the general elementary structure of society itself, is a mere piece of ingenuity. This contradiction with the rigid laws of the process of things is shown in all its evidence in Proudhon, who, reproducing without knowing it, or copying directly, some of the one-sided English socialists, wished to arrest and change history, armed with a definition and a syllogism. The partisans of critical communism recognized that history has the right to follow its course. The bourgeois phase can be outgrown and it will be. But as long as it exists it has its laws. The rela- tivity of these consists in the fact that they grow and develop in certain determined conditions, but their relativity is not simply the opposite of neces- sity, a mere appearance, a soap-bubble. These laws may disappear and they will disappear by the very fact of the change of society, but they do not yield * Thus there arises notably in France the illusion of a social monarchy which, succeeding the liberal epoch, should solve harmoniously what is called the social question. This absurdity reproduces itself in infinite varieties of social- ism of the pulpit and State socialism. To the different forms of ideological and religious uptopianism is joined a new form of bureaucratic and fiscal utopianism, the Utopia of the idiots. COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 85 to the arbitrary suggestion which demands a change, proclaims a reform., or formulates a programme. Communism makes common cause with the prole- tariat because in this resides the revolutionary force which, bursts, breaks, shakes and dissolves the pres- ent social form and creates in it, little by little, new conditions ; or to be more exact, the very fact of its movement shows to us that these new conditions are already born. The theory of the class struggle was found. It was seen to appear both in the origins of the bour- geoisie (whose intrinsic processus was already illus- trated by the science of economics), and in this new appearance of the proletariat. The relativity of economic laws was discovered, but at the same time their relative necessity was understood. Herein lies the whole method and justification of the new materialistic conception of history. Those deceive themselves who, calling it the economic interpreta- tion of history, think they understand it completely. That designation is better suited, and is only suited, to certain analytic attempts,* which, taking separate- ly and in a distinct fashion on the one side the eco- nomic forms and categories, and on the other, for example, law, legislation, politics, customs, — pro- ceed to study the reciprocal influences of the differ- ent sides of life considered in an abstract fashion. Quite different is our position. Ours is the organic conception of history. The totality of the unity of * For example in the essays of Th. Rogers. 86 IN MEMORY OF THE social life is the subject matter present to our minds. It is economics itself which dissolves in the course of one process, to reappear in as many morpholog- ical stages, in each of which it serves as a substruc- ture for all the rest. Finally, it is not our method to extend the so-called economic factor isolated in an abstract fashion over all the rest, as our adversaries imagine, but it is, before everything else, to form an historic conception of economics and to explain the other changes by means of its changes. Therein lies our answer to all the criticisms which come to us from all the domains of learned ignorance, not ex- cepting the socialists who are insufficiently grounded and who are sentimental or hysterical. And we ex- plain our position thus as Marx has done in his Capital, not the first book of critical communism, but the last great book of bourgeois economics. At the moment when the Manifesto was written the historic horizon did not go beyond the classic world, the scarcely studied German antiquities and the Biblical tradition which had only lately been re- duced to the prosaic conditions of all profane his- tory Our historic horizon is now quite another thing, since it extends to the Aryan antiqui- ties and to the ancient deposits of Egypt and Me- sopotamia which precede all the Semitic traditions. And it extends still further back into prehistory, that is to say, into unwritten history. Morgan has given us a knowledge of ancient society, that is to say a pre-political society, and the key to understand COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 87 how from it came all the later forms marked by monogamy, the development of the paternal family, the appearance of property, first of the gens, then of the family, lastly individual, and by the successive establishment of the alliances between gentes which are the origin of the State. All this is illustrated by the knowledge of the process of technique in the discovery and in the use of the means and instru- ments of labor and by the understanding of the ef- fect of this process upon the social complexus, urg- ing it in certain directions and making it traverse certain stages. These discoveries may still be cor- rected at certain points, notably by the study of the different specific fashions according to which in different parts of the world the passage from bar- barism to civilization has been effected. But, hence- forth, one fact is indisputable, namely, that we have before our eyes the general embryogenic record of human development from primitive communism to those complex formations as at Athens or at Rome with their constitutions of citizens arranged in classes according to census which not long ago con- stituted the columns of Hercules for research into written tradition. The classes which the Manifesto assumed have been later resolved into their process of formation and in this can already be recognized the plexus of reasons and of different economic causes for the categories of the economic science of our bourgeois epoch. The dream of Fourier to find a place for an epoch of civilization in the series of a long and vast process has been realized. A sci- 88 IN MEMORY OF THE entific solution has been found for the problem of the origin of inequality among men which Rousseau had tried to solve by arguments of an original dia- lectic, relying however upon too few real data. At two points, the extreme points for us, the hu- man process is palpable. One of these is the origin of the bourgeoisie, so recent and in the full light of the science of economics; the other is the ancient formation of the society divided into classes, which marks the passage from higher barbarism to civili- zation (the epoch of the State) to use expressions employed by Morgan. All that is found between these two epochs is what has, up to this time, formed the subject matter of the chroniclers, the historians properly so-called, the jurists, the theologians and the philosophers. To traverse and reanimate all this domain with the new historic conception is not an easy thing. We must not be over-hasty in tabulating it. At the very beginning we must under- stand the economics relative to each epoch,* in order to explain specifically the classes which develop in it, avoiding hypothetical and uncertain data and tak- ing care not to carry over our own conditions into each epoch. For that, skilled fingers are needed. Thus, for example, what the Manifesto says of the first origin of the bourgeoisie proceeding from the serfs of the Middle Ages incorporated little by little into the cities is not a general truth. This mode of * Who would have thought a few years ago of the discovery and the authentic interpretation of an ancient Babylonian law? COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 89 origin is peculiar to Germany and to the other coun- tries which reproduce its process. It is not the case either in Italy, nor in Southern France, nor in Spain, which were the fields upon which began the first his- tory of the bourgeoisie, that is to say, of modern civilization. In this first phase are found all the: premises of the whole capitalist society as Marx in- formed us in a note to the first volume of Capital.* This first phase which reaches its perfect form in the Italian municipalities forms the pre-historic background for that capitalist accumulation which Marx has explained with so many characteristic details in the evolution of England. But I will stop there. The proletarians can have in view nothing but the future. That with which all scientific socialists are primarily concerned is the present in which are spontaneously developed and in which are ripening the conditions of the future. The knowledge of the past is practically of use and of interest only in so far as it throws light upon and explains the present. For the moment it is enough to say that the parti- sans of critical communism fifty years ago conceived the elements of the new and definite philosophy of history. Soon this fashion of seeing will impose itself because it will be impossible to think the con- trary ; and this discovery will have the fate of Col- umbus' egg. And perhaps before an army of scien- tists has made an application of this conception to * Note 189, p. 740, of the 3rd German edition. 90 IN MEMORY OF THE the continuous narration of the whole history, the success of the proletariat will have become such that the bourgeois epoch will appear to all as some- thing that must be left behind because it will nearly be so in reality. To understand is to leave behind (Hegel). When, fifty years ago, the Manifesto made of the proletarians, of the unfortunates who excited pity, the predestined grave-diggers of the bourgeoisie, the circumference of this burial place must have ap- peared very small to the imagination of the writers who scarcely concealed in the gravity of their style the idealism of their intellectual passion. The prob- able circumference in their imagination then em- braced only France and England, and it would scarcely have touched the frontiers of other coun- tries, for instance, Germany, To-day the circum- ference appears to us immense by reason of the rapid and colossal extension of the bourgeois form of production which by inevitable reaction enlarges, makes universal and multiplies the movement of the proletariat and immensely expands the scene upon which is projected the picture of the coming communism. The burial place extends as far as the eye can reach. The more productive forces this ma- gician calls forth, the more he excites and prepares forces that must rebel against himself. All those who were communists ideological, re- ligious and Utopian, or even prophetic and apocalyp- tic in the past have always believed that the reign COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. 91 of justice, equality and happiness was destined to have the world for its theatre. To-day the world is invaded by civilization and everywhere is developing that society which lives upon class antagonisms and class domination, the form of bourgeois production (Japan may serve us for an example.) The co- existence of the two nations in one and the same state, which the divine Plato had already described, is perpetuated. The earth will not be won over to communism to-morrow. But as the confines of the bourgeois world enlarge, more numerous are those who enter into it, abandoning and leaving behind the lower forms of production, — and thus the at- tempt of communism gains in firmness and preci- sion ; especially because in the domain and struggle of competition, the deviations due to conquest and colonization are diminishing. The proletarian In- ternational, while embryonic in the Communist League of fifty years ago, henceforth becomes In- teroceanic and it affirms on the first of every May that the proletarians of the whole world are really and actively united. The future grave-diggers of the bourgeoisie and their descendants to many gen- erations will ever remember the date of the Com- munist Manifesto. PART II HISTORICAL MATERIALISM PART II HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. I. This class of studies, like many others, but this more than any other, is confronted with a great difficulty, indeed an irksome hindrance, in that vice of minds educated by literary methods alone which is ordinarily called verbalism. This bad habit creeps into and spreads itself through all domains of knowledge ; but in studies which relate to the so- called moral world, that is to say, to the historico- social complexus, it very often happens that the cult and the dominion of words succeed in corrupting and blotting out the real and living sense of things. In the field where a long observation, repeated ex- periences, the certain use of improved instruments, the general or partial application of the calculus have resulted in putting the mind into a constant and methodical relation with things and their varia- tions, as in the natural sciences properly so-called, — there the myth and superstition of words are left behind and vanquished ; there the questions of term- inology no longer have more than the secondary value of pure convention. In the study of human re- lations and actions, on the contrary, the passions, the interests, the prejudices of school, sect class and 95 96 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. religion, the literary abuse of the traditional means of representing thought, and scholasticism, ever vanquished and always reborn, conceal the actual things, or transform them involuntarily into terms, into words, into abstract and conventional fashions of speech. We must, first of all, take account of this difficulty when we use the expression or the formula "mate- rialistic conception of history." Many have imagined, do imagine, and will imagine that it is possible and convenient to penetrate into the sense of the phrase by the simple analysis of the words which compose it instead of arriving at it from the context oi an explanation, from the genetic study of the formation of the doctrine,* or from the polemical writings in which its partisans refute the objections of its oppo- nents. Verbalism tends always to shut itself up in purely formal definitions ; it gives rise in the minds to this erroneous belief, that it is an easy thing to reduce into terms and into simple and palpable ex- pressions the agitated and immense complexus of nature and history and that it is easy to picture the multiform and complicated interlacings of causes and effects ; in clearer terms, it obliterates the mean- ing of the problems because it sees in them nothing but questions of nomenclature. If, moreover, it then happens that verbalism finds * This genetic study forms the subject of my first es- say, In Memory of the Communist Manifesto, which is the indispensable preamble to an understanding of all the rest. HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 97 a support in certain theoretical hypotheses, for ex- ' ample, that matter indicates something which is be- low or opposed to another higher or nobler thing which is called spirit ; or if it happens to be at one with that literary habit which opposes the word materialism, understood in a disparaging sense, to all that, in a word, is called idealism, that is to say, to the sum total of the anti-egoistic inclinations and acts ; then our embarrassment is extreme ! Then we are told that in this doctrine it is attempted to ex- plain the whole of man by the mere calculation of his material interests and that no value whatever is allowed to any ideal interest. The inexperience, the incapacity and the haste of certain partisans and propagandists of this doctrine have also been a cause of these confusions. In their eagerness to explain to others what they themselves only half understand, at a time when the doctrine itself is only in its begin- nings and still has need of many developments, they have believed they could apply it, such as it was, to whatever historic fact they were considering, and they have almost reduced it to tatters, exposing it thus to the easy criticism and the ridicule of people on the watch for scientific novelties, and other idle persons of the same type. Since it has been my privilege in these first pages simply to rebut these prejudices (in a preliminary fashion) and unmask the intentions and the ten- dencies underlying them, it must be remembered that the meaning of this doctrine ought, before all 98 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. else, to be drawn from the position which it takes and occupies with regard to the doctrines against which it is in reality opposed, and particularly with regard to the ideologies of every sort; — that the proof of its value consists exclusively in the more suitable and more appropriate explanation of the succession of human events which is derived from it; — that this doctrine does not imply a subjective preference for a certain quality or a certain sum of human interests opposed by free choice to other in- terests, but that it merely affirms the objective co- ordination and subordination of all interests in the_ development of all society ; and this it affirms, thanks to that genetic processus which consists in going from the conditions to the conditioned, from the elements of formation to the things formed. Let the verbalists reason as they like over the value of the word matter in so far as it implies or recalls a metaphysical conception, or in so far as it is the expression of the last hypothetical substratum of experience. We are not here in the domain of physics, chemistry or biology ; we are only searching for the explicit conditions of human association in so far as it is no longer simply animal. It is not for us to support our inductions or our deductions upon the data of biology, but, on the contrary, to recog- nize before all else the peculiarities of human asso- ciation, which form and develop through the suc- cession and the growing perfection of the activity of man himself in given and variable conditions, and to HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 99 find tlie relations of co-ordination and subordination of the needs which are the substratum of will and action. It is not proposed to discover an intention nor to formulate a criticism ; it is merely the neces- sity arising from the facts that must be put in evidence. And as men, not by free choice, but because they could not act otherwise, satisfy first certain elemen- tary needs, which, in their turn, give rise to others in their upward development, and as for the satisfac- tion of their needs, whatever they may be, they in- vent and employ certain means and certain tools and associate themselves in certain definite fashionSj_the_ materialism of historical interpretation is nothing else than an attempt to reconstruct by thought with method the genesis and the complexity of the social life which develops through the ages. The novelty of this doctrine does not differ from that of all the other doctrines which after many excursions through the domains of the imagination have finally arrived, very painfully, at reaching the prose of real- ity and halting there. II. There is a certain affinity, apparently at least, be- tween that formal vice of verbalism and another defect of the mind, whose origins may, however, be varied. In consideration of some of its most com- mon and popular effects I will call it phraseology, al- 100 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. though this word is not an exact expression of the thing and does not set forth its origin. For long centuries men have written on history, have explained it, have illustrated it. The most varied interests, from the interests more immediately practical to the interests purely esthetic, have moved different writers to conceive and to execute this type of composition. These different types have always taken birth in different countries long after the ori- gins of civilization, of the development of the state and of the passage from the primitive communist so- ciety to the society which rests upon class differ- ences and class antagonisms. The historians, even if they have been as artless as Herodotus, were al- ways born and formed in a society having nothing ingenuous in it, but very complicated and complex, and at a time when the reasons for this complication and complexity were unknown and their origins forgotten. This complexity, with all the contrasts which it bears within itself and which it reveals later and makes burst forth in its various vicissitudes, stood forth before the narrators as something mys- terious and calling for an explanation, and if the historian wished to give some sequence and a certain connection to the things narrated, he was obliged to add certain general views to the simple narration. From the jealousy of the gods of Father Herodotus to the environment of M. Taine, an infinite number of concepts serving as means of explanation and as complements to the things related have been im- posed upon the narrators by the natural voices of HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 101 their immediate thought. Class tendencies, relig- ious ideas, popular prejudices, influences or imita- tions of a current philosophy, excursions of imagi- nation and a desire to give an artistic appearance to facts known only in a fragmentary fashion, all these causes and other analogous causes have contributed to form the substratum of the more or less artless theory of events which is implicitly at the bottom of the narration, or which serves at least to flavor and adorn it. Whether men speak of chance or of des- tiny, whether they appeal to the providential direc- tion of human events, or adhere to the word and concept of chance, the only divinity left in the rigid and often coarse conception of Machiavelli, or .whether they speak, as is frequent enough at the present time, of the logic of events, all these con- ceptions were and are effects and results of ingen- uous thought, of immediate thought, of thought which cannot justify to itself its course, and its products, either by the paths of criticism or by the methods cf experience. To fill up with conventional causes (e. g., chance) or with a statement of theoret- ical plausibility (e. g., the inevitable course of events which sometimes is confused in the mind with the notion of progress) the gaps of our knowledge as to the fashion in which things have been actually produced by their own necessity without care tor our free will and our consent, that is the motive and the result of this popular philosophy, latent or ex- plicit, in the chroniclers, which by reason of its su- 102 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. perficial character dissolves as soon as scientific crit- icism appears. In all these concepts and all these imaginings which in the light of criticism appear as simple pro- visional devices and effects of an unripe thought, but which often seem to "cultured people" the non plus ultra of intelligence, — in all these a great part of the human processus is revealed and reflected; and, consequently, we should not consider them as gratuitous inventions nor as products of a momen- tary illusion. They are a part and a moment in the development of what we call the human mind. If later it is observed that these concepts and these imaginings are mingled and confounded in the ac- cepted opinions of cultured people, or of those who pass for such, they make up an immense mass of prejudices and they constitute an impediment which ignorance opposes to the clear and complete vision of the real things. These prejudices turn up again as etymological derivations in the language of pro- fessional politicians, of so-called publicists and jour- nalists of every kind, and offer the support of rhet- oric to self-styled public opinion. To oppose and then to replace this mirage of un- critical conceptions, these idols of the imagination, these effects of literary artifice, this conventionalism by the real subjects, or the forces which are posi- tively acting, — that is to say, men in their various and diversified social relations, — this is the revolu- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 103 tionary enterprise and the scientific aim of the new doctrine which renders objective and I might say naturalizes the explanation of the historical pro- cessus. A certain definite nation, that is to say, not a cer- tain mass of individuals, but a plexus of men or- ganized in such and such a fashion by natural re- lations of consanguinity, or following such or such an artificial or customary order of relationship and affinity, or by reason of permanent proximity; — this nation, on a certain circumscribed and limited territory, having such and such fertility, productive in such and such a manner acquired through cer- tain definite forms by continuous labor; — this na- tion, thus distributed over this territory and thus divided and articulated by the effect of a definite di- vision of labor which is scarcely beginning to give birth to or which has already developed and ripened such and such a division of classes, or which has already disintegrated or transformed a whole series of classes ;- -this nation which possesses such and such instruments from the flint stone to the electric light and from the bow and arrow to the repeating rifle, which produces according to a certain fashion and shares its products conformably to its way of producing; — this nation, which by all these rela- tions constitutes a society in which either by habits of mutual accommodation or by explicit conventions, or by acts of violence suffered and endured, has al- ready given birth, or is on the point of giving birth 104 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. to legal-political relations which result in the for- mation of the state ; — this nation, which by^the^or— ganization of Jhe„state, which is only a means for fixing7~3efending and perpetuating inequalities-; by reason of the antagonisms which it bears within it- self, renders continuously unstableNthe organization itself, whence result the political movements and revolutions, and therefore the reasons for progress and retrogression : — there is the sum of what is at the bottom of all history. And there is the victory of realistic prose over all the fantastic and ideologi- cal combinations. Certainly it requires some resignation to see things as they are, passing beyond the phantoms which for centuries have prevented right vision. But this revelation of realistic doctrine was not and is not designed to be the rebellion of the material man against the ideal man. It has been and is, on the contrary, the discovery of the principles and the motives which are real and which belong to all human development, including all that we call the ideal in positive conditions, determined by facts which carry in themselves the reasons and the law ani the rhythm of their own development. III. But it would be a complete error to believe that the writers who narrate, explain, or illustrate have themselves invented and given life to this enormous mass of unripe concepts, imaginings, and explana- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 105 tions which, thanks to the force of prejudice, con- cealed for centuries the real truth. It may happen, and it certainly does happen, that some of these concepts are the fruit and the product of personal views, or of literary currents formed in the narrow professional circle of the universities and academies. The people in this case are absolutely ignorant of them. But the important fact is that history itself has put on these veils ; that is to say, that the very actors and workers of the historic events — great masses of people, directing and ordering classes, masters of state, sects or parties, in the narrowest sense of the word, if we make exception for an occa- sional moment of lucid interval — never had up to the end of the past century a consciousness of their own work, unless it be through some ideological envelope which prevented any sight of the real causes. Al- ready at the distant epoch when barbarism was pass- ing over into civilization, that is to say, when the first discoveries of agriculture, the stable establish- ment of a population upon a definite territory, the first division of labor in society, the first alliances of different gentes, gave the conditions in which devel- oped property and the state, or at least the city, — even then, at the epoch of all the first social revolu- tions, men ideally transformed their work, seeing in it the miraculous acts of gods and heroes. So much so that, while acting as they could and as they must, granted the necessity and the fact of their relative economic development, they conceived an explanation of their own work as if it did not belong 106 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. to them. This ideological envelope of human works has changed since then more than once in form, in appearance, in combinations and in relations in the course of the centuries, from the immediate produc- tion of the ingenuous myths up to the complicated theological systems and to The City of God of St. Augustine — from the superstitious credulity in mira- cles down to the bewildering miracles of the meta- physicians, that is to say, down to the Idea which for the decadents of Hegelianism engenders of it- self, in itself, by its own disaggregation the most in- congruous variations of social life in the course of history. Now, precisely because the visual angle of ideo- logical interpretation has not been finally outgrown until very lately, and because it is only in our days that a sum total of the real and really acting rela- tions has been clearly distinguished from the in- genuous reflections of myth and the more artificial reflections of religion and metaphysics, our doc- trine states a new problem and carries within itself grave difficulties for whoever wishes to fit it for pro- viding a specific explanation of the history of the past. The problem consists in this: that our doctrine necessitates a new criticism of the sources of his- tory. And I do not wish to be understood as speak- ing exclusively of the criticism of documents in the proper and ordinary sense of the word, because as for this we may content ourselves with what is de- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 107 livered to us ready made by the critics, the scholars, and the professional philologists. But I would. speak of that immediate source which is behindjbg "scTCalled'ttocurnents properly and which, before ex- pressing itself and fixing itself in these, resides in the spirit and in the form of the consciousness in which the actors accounted to themselves for the motives of their own work. This spirit, that is to say, this consciousness, is often inadequate to the causes which we are now in a position to discover, from which it follows that the actors seem to us enveloped, as it were, in a circle of illusions. To strip the historic facts from these envelopes which clothe the very facts while they are developing — this is to make a new criticism of the sources in the realistic sense of the word and not in the formal documentary sense. It is, in short, to make react upon the knowledge of past conditions the con- sciousness of which we are now capable, and there- by to reconstruct them anew. But this revision of the most direct sources, if it marks the extreme limit of the historic self-con- sciousness which may be reached, may be an occa- sion for falling into a serious error. As we place ourselves at a point of view which is beyond the ideological views to which the actors in history were indebted for a consciousness of their work and in which they often found both the motives and the justification of their action, we may falsely believe that these ideological views were a pure appearance, 108 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. a simple artifice, a pure illusion in the vulgar sense of the word. Martin Luther, like the other great reformers, his contemporaries, never knew, as we know to-day, that the Reformation was but an epi- sode in the development of the Third Estate, and an economic revolt of the German nation against the exploitation of the Papal court. He was what he was, as an agitator and a politician, because he was wholly taken up with the belief which made him see in the class movement which gave an impulse to the agitation a return to true Christianity and a divine necessity in the vulgar course of events. The study of remote effects, that is to say, the increasing strength of the bourgeoisie of the cities against the feudal lords, the increase of the territorial dominion of the princes at the expense of the inter-territorial and super-territorial power of the emperor and the pope, the violent repression of the movement of the peasants and the more properly proletarian move- ment of the Anabaptists permit us now to recon- struct the authentic history of the economic causes of the Reformation, particularly in the final pro- portions which it took, which is the best of proofs. But that does not mean that we are privileged to detach the fact arrived at from the mode of its realization and to analyze the circumstantial inte- grality by a posthumous analysis altogether subjec- tive and simplified. The inner causes, or, as would be said now, the profane and prosaic motives of the Reformation, appear to us clearly in France, where it was not victorious; clearly again in the HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 109 Low Countries, where, apart from the differences of nationality, the contrasts of economic interests are shown strikingly in the struggle against Spain ; very clearly again in England, where the religious renovation realized, thanks to political violence, placed in full light the passage to those conditions which are for our modern bourgeoisie the forerun- ners of capitalism. Postjactum, and after the tajrdy realization of unforeseen con&eguences^^the history oT the xeaLnictSKinests which werethe inner causes of the^ Reformation, in greai,, part .unknown to the actors themselves, will appear in- full, light. But that the fact came about precisely as it did come about, that it took on certain determined forms, that it clothed itself in certain vestments, that it painted itself in certain colors, that it put in movement cer- tain passions, that it displayed a special degree of fanaticism, — in these consist its specific character, which no analytic ability can make otherwise than as it was. Only the love of paradox inseparable from the zeal of the passionate popularizers of a new doctrine can have brought some to believe that to write history it was sufficient to put on record merely the economic moment (often still unknown and often unknowable), and thereupon to cast to the earth all the rest as a useless burden with which men had capriciously loaded themselves, as a super- fluity, a mere trifle, or even, as it were, something not existent. From Jh e fact tha t histor y .rnugtjbe .taken JnMts.. 110 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. entirety and that in it the kernel and the husk are but one,, as Goethe said„gf all things, three .conse- q ue ££siJpnowj— _,,_ First, it is evident that in the domain of histor- ico-social determinism, the linking of causes to effects, of conditions to the things conditioned, of antecedents to consequents, is never evident at first sight in the subjective determinism of individual psychology. In this last domain it was a relatively easy thing for abstract and formal philosophy to dis- cover, passing above all the baubles of fatalism and free will, the evidence of the motive in every voli- tion, because, in fine, there is no wish without its determining motive. But beneath the motives and the wish there is the genesis of both, and to recon- struct this genesis we must leave the closed field of consciousness to arrive at the analysis of the simple necessities, which, on the one side, are derived from social conditions, and on the other side are lost in the obscure background of organic dispositions, in ancestry and in atavism. It is not otherwise^ with historical determinism, where, in the same way, we begin with motives religious, political, aesthetic, passionate, etc., but where we must subsequently discover the causes of these motives in the ma- terial conditions underlying them. Now the study of these conditions should be so specified that we may perceive indubitably not only what are the causes, but again by what mediations they ar- rive at that form which reveals them to the con- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. Ill sciousness as motives whose origin is often oblit- erated. And thence follows indubitably this second conse^ quence that in our doctrine we have not to re-trans- late into economic categories all the complex mani- festations of history, but onlyjo explain in the last analysis (Engels) all the histork- facts by m,eans_ of, the underlying economic /structure ^(Marx) , whicji necessitates analysis and reduction and then inter- linking and construction. It results from this, in the_third_pjace, that, pass- ing from the underlying economic structure. to. .the picturesque whole of a givet^rnstory^^we need the aid of that complexus of notions and knowledge which may be called, for lack qi : a better term, social psycholqgyj^^do not mean by that to allude to the fantastic existence of a social psyche nof to the concept of an assumed collective spirit which by its own laws, independent of the consciousness of in- dividuals and of their material and definable rela- tions, realizes itself and shows itself in social life. That is pure mysticism. Neither do I wish to allude to those attempts at generalization which fill up treatises on social psychology and the general idea of which is to transport and apply to a subject which is called social consciousness the known categories and forms of individual psychology. Nor again do I wish to allude to that mass of semi-organic and semi-psychological denominations by the aid of which some attribute to the social being, as Schaffle does, a brain, a spinal column, sensibility, sentiment, 112 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. conscience, will, etc. But I wish to speak of more modest and more prosaic things, that is to say, of those concrete and precise states of mind which make us know as they really were the plebeians of Rome at a certain spoch, the artisans of Florence at the moment when the movement of the Ciompi burst forth, or those peasants of France within whom was engendered, to follow Taine's expression, the "spon- taneous anarchy" of 1789, those peasants who final- ly became free laborers and small proprietors, or, aspiring to property, transformed themselves rap- idly from victors over the foreigner into automatic instruments of reaction. This social psychology, which no one can reduce to abstract canons because, in most cases, it is merely descriptive, this is what the chroniclers, the orators, the artists, the roman- cers and the ideologists of every sort have seen and up to now have conceived as the exclusive object of their studies. In this psychology, which is the spe- cific consciousness of men in given social conditions, the agitators, orators and propagandists trust to- day, and to it they appeal. We know that it is the fruit, the outcome, the effect of certain social con- ditions actually determined ; — this class, in this situ- ation, determined by the functions which it fulfills, by the subjection in which it is held, by the do- minion which it exercises ; — and finally, these classes, these functions, this subjection and this do- minion involve such and such a determined form of production and distribution of the immediate means of life, that is to say, a determined economic struc- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 113 ture. This social psychology, by its nature always circumstantial, is not the expression of the abstract and generic process of the self-styled human intel- lect. It is always a specified formation from speci- fied conditions. We hold this principle to be in- disputable, that it is not the forms of consciousness which determine the human being, but it is the man- ner of being which determines the consciousness^ (Marx). But these forms of consciousness^ even jis they are determined byJhe conditions, of Jife^constitute. in themselves also a part of history. This does not consist only in the economic anatomy, but in all that combination which clothes and covers that an- atomy even up to the multicolored reflections of the imagination. ._„ J n other word_s 2 _therg_js_ no fact in history which does not recall by its origin the con- ditions of the underlying economic structure, but there is no fact in history which is not preceded, accompanied and followed by determined forms of^ consciousness, whether it be superstitious or experi- mental, ingenuous or reflective, impulsive or self- controlledj fantastic or reasoning. IV. I was saying a moment ago that our doctrine makes history objective and in a certain sense na- turalizes it, going from the explanation of the data, evident at first sight, of the personalities acting with design, and of the auxiliary conceptions of the ac- 114 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. tion, to the causes and the motives of the will and the action, in order to find thereupon the co-ordina- tion of these causes and of these motives in the pre- elementary processus of the production of the im- mediate means of existence. Now this term "naturalizing" has led more than one mind into confusing this order of problems with another order of problems, that is to say, into extending to history the laws and the manners of thinking which have already appeared suitable to the study and explanation of the material world in general and of the animal world in particular. And because Darwinism succeeded in carrying, thanks to the principle of the transformation of species, the last citadel of the metaphysical fixity of things, and in discerning, in the organisms, phases, as it were, and moments of a real and proper natural his- tory, it has been imagined that it was a common- place and simple enterprise to borrow for an ex- planation of the future and the history of human life the concepts, the principles and the methods of examination to which that animal life is subjected which in consequence of the immediate conditions of the struggle for existence is unfolding to topo- graphical environments not modified by the action of labor. Darwinism, political and social, has, like an epidemic, for many years invaded the mind of more than one thinker, and many more of the ad- vocates and declaimers of sociology, and it has been reflected as a fashionable habit and a phraseological current even in the daily language of the politicians. HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 115 It seems at first sight that there is something im- mediately evident and instinctively plausible in this fashion of reasoning, which it may be said is principally distinguished by its abuse of analogy and by its haste in drawing conclusions. Man is without doubt an animal, and he is linked by con- nections of descent and affinity to other animals. He has no privileges of origin or of elementary struc- ture, and his organism is merely one particular case of general physiology. His first immediate field was that of simple nature not modified by work, and from thence are derived the imperious and inevita- ble conditions of the struggle for existence, with the consequent forms of adaptation. Thence are born races in the true and authentic sense of the word ; that is to say, in so far as they are immediate determinations of black, white, yellow, woolly- haired, straight-haired, etc., and not secondary his- torico-social formations, that is to say, peoples and nations. Thence are born the primitive instincts of sociability and in life in promiscuity arise the first rudiments of sexual selection. But if we can reconstruct in imagination the prim- itive savage, by combining our conjectures, it is not given us to have an empirical intuition of him, just as it is not given us to determine the genesis of that hiatus, that is to say, that break in continuity, thanks to which human life is found detached from animal life to rise, in the sequel, to an ever higher level. All men who live at this moment on the earth's surface and all those who, having lived in 116 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. the past, were the objects of any trustworthy ob- servation, are found, and were found, already suffi- ciently removed from the moment when purely ani- mal life had ceased. A certain social life with cus- toms and institutions, even if it be of the most ele- mentary form that we know, that is to say, of the Australian tribes, divided into classes and practis- ing the marriage of all the men of one class with all the women of another class, separates human life by a great interval from animal life. If we consider the maternal gens, of which the classic type, the Iroquois type, has, thanks to Morgan's work, revolutionized prehistoric science, while giv- ing us at the same time the key to the origins of history properly so called, we have a form of society already much advanced by the complexity of its re- lations. At that stage of social life which, accord- ing to our knowledge, seems very elementary, that is to say, in the Australian society, not only does a very complicated language differentiate men from all other animals (and language is a condition and an instrument, a cause and an effect of sociability), but the specialization of human life, apart from the discovery of fire, is manifested by the use of many other artificial means by which the needs of life are satisfied. A certain territory acquired for the com- mon use of a tribe, a certain art of hunting — the use of certain instruments of defense and attack and the possession of certain utensils for preserving the things acquired — and then the ornamentation of the body, etc., all this means that at bottom this life HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 117 rests upon an artificial, although very elementary, basis, upon which men endeavor to fix themselves and adapt themselves, — upon a basis which is after all the condition of all further progress. Accord- ing as this artificial basis is more or less formed, the men who have produced it and who live in it are considered more or less savage or barbarous. This first formation constitutes what we may call pre-history. History, according to the literary use of the word, namely, that part of the human processus whose traditions are fixed in the memory, begins at a moment when the artificial basis has been formed for a considerable length of time. For example, the canalization of Mesopotamia gives us the ancient pre-Semitic Babylonian state, while the extremly ancient Egyptian civilization rests upon the appli- cation of the Nile to agriculture. Upon this arti- ficial basis, which appears in the extreme horizon of known history, lived, as now, not shapeless masses of individuals, but organized groups whose organization was fixed by a certain distribution of tasks, that is to say, of labor and by consecutive methods of co-ordination and subordination. These relations, these connections, these ways of living were not and are not the result of the crystalliza- tion of customs under the immediate action of the animal struggle for existence. What is more, they presuppose the discovery of certain instruments, and, for example, the domestication of certain ani- mals, the working of minerals and even of iron, 118 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. the introduction of slavery, etc., instruments and methods of economy which have first differentiated communities from each other and have subsequently differentiated the component parts of these com- munities themselves. In other words, the works of m en in sc tiar asjhey live to gethe r., react upon the men themselves. Their discoveries, and their in- ventions, by creating artificial ways of living, have produced not only habits and customs (clothing, cooking of food, etc.), but relations and bonds of coexistence proportioned and adapted to the mode of production and reproduction of the means of im- mediate life. / At the dawn of traditional history economics is /already operating. Men are working to live, on a foundation which has been in great part modified by their work and with tools which are completely their work. And from that moment they have strug- gled among themselves to conquer each from the other a superior position in the use of these artificial means; that is to say, they have struggled among themselves whether as serfs and masters, subjects and lords, conquered and conquerors, exploited and exploiters, both where they have progressed and where they have retrograded and where they have halted in a form which they have not been capable of outgrowing, but never have they returned to the animal life by the complete loss of their artificial foundation. Historical science has, then, as its first and prin- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 119 cipal object the determination and the investigation of this artificial foundation, its origin, its composi- tion, its changes and its transformations. To say that all this is only a part and a prolongation of na- ture, is to say a thing which by its too abstract and too generic character has no longer any meaning. The human race, in fact, lives only in earthly conditions, and we cannot suppose it to be trans- planted elsewhere. Under these conditions it has found from its very first beginnings down to the present day the immediate means necessary for the development of labor, that is to say, for its material progress as for its inner formation. These natural conditions were and they are always indispensable to the sporadic agriculture of the nomads, who sometimes cultivated the earth merely for the pas- turage of animals, as well as for the refined products of intensive modern horticulture. These earthly conditions, precisely as they have furnished the dif- ferent sorts of stones suited for the fabrication of the first weapons, furnish now also, with coal, the elements of the great industry; precisely as they gave the first laborers osiers and willows to plait, they give now all the materials necessary to the com- plicated technique of electricity. It is not, however, the natural materials them- selves which have progressed. On the contrary, it is only men who progress, through discovering lit- tle by little in nature the conditions which permit them to produce in more and more complex forms, thanks to the labor accumulated in experience. This 120 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. progress does not consist merely in the sort of prog- ress with which subjective psychology is concerned, that is to say, the inner modifications which would be the proper and direct development of the intel- lect, the reasoning and the thought. Moreover, this inner progress is but a secondary and derived prod- uct, in proportion as there is already a progress realized in the artificial foundation which is the sum of the social relations resulting from the forms and the distributions of labor. It is, then, a meaningless affirmation to say that all this is but a simple pro- longation of nature, unless one wishes to employ this word in so generic a sense that it no longer in- dicates anything precise and distinct; that which is not realized by the work of man. History is the work of man in so far as man can create and improve his instruments of labor, and with these instruments can create an artificial en- vironment whose complicated effects react later upon himself, and which by its present state and its successive modifications is the occasion and the con- dition of his development. There are, then, no rea- sons for carrying back that work of man which is history to the simple struggle for existence. If this struggle modifies and improves the organs, of ani- mals, and if in given circumstances and methods it produces and develops new organs, it still does not produce that continuous, perfected and traditional movement which is the human processus. Our doc- trine must not be confounded with Darwinism, and it need not invoke anew the conception of a myth- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 121 ical, mystical or metaphorical form of fatalism. If it is true in effect that history rests, before all else, upon the development of technique, that is to say, if it is true that the successive discovery of tools gives rise to the successive distributions of labor, and therewith to the inequalities whose sum total, more or less stable, forms the social organism, it is equally true that the discovery of these instruments is at once the cause and the effect of these condi- tions and of those forms of the inner life to which, isolating them by psychological abstraction, we give the name of imagination, intellect, reason, thought, etc. By producing successively the different social environment, that is to say, the successive artificial foundations, man has produced himself, and in this consists the serious kernel, the concrete reason, the positive foundation of that which by various fan- tastic combinations and by a varied logical architec- ture has suggested to the ideologists the notion of the progress of the human mind. Nevertheless, this expression of naturalizing his- tory, which, understood in too broad and too gen- eric a sense, may be the occasion of the equivoca- tions of which we have spoken, when it is,- on the contrary, employed with proper precaution and in a tentative fashion, sums up briefly the criticism of all the ideological views which, in the interpretation of history, start from this hypothesis, that human work or activity are one and the same with free will, free choice and voluntary designs. 122 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. It was easy and convenient for the theologians to carry back the course of human events to a pre- conceived plan or design, because they passed di- rectly from the facts of experience to an assumed mind which ruled the universe. (The jurists, who first had occasion to discover in the institutions which formed the object of their studies a certain guiding thread through the forms which manifestly succeeded each other, carried over, as they still carry over as cheerfully, the reasoning faculty which is their own quality, to serve as an explanation for the whole vast social fabric, however complicated. - The men of politics, who naturally take their point of departure in this datum of experience, that the officers o-f the state, whether by the acquiescence of the subject masses or profiting by the antitheses of interests of the different social groups, may set aims for themselves and realize them voluntarily and in a deliberate fashion, — these men are brought to see in the succession of human events only a variation of these designs, these projects and these inten- tions. Now our conception, while revolutionizing in their foundations the hypotheses of the theologians, the jurists and the politicians, terminates in this affirmation, that human labor and activity in gen- eral are not always one and the same thing in the course of history with the will which acts with de- sign, with preconceived plans and with its free choice of means ; that is to say, that they are not one and the same thing with the reasoning faculty. All that has happened in history is the work ofmanT" HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 123 but it was not, ancHs n ot, with rare exceptions ^ ibe. ~ r ^L jjJLJ critkaLchoice or of a r easoning desire- Moreover, it was and is through "necessity that, de- termined b}' external needs and occasions, this ac- tivity engenders an experience and a development of internal and external organs. Among these organs we must include intelligence and reason which also are the result and consequence of repeated and ac- cumulated experience. The integral formation of man in his historical development is henceforth no longer a hypothetical datum nor a simple conjec- ture. It is an intuitive and palpable truth. The conditions of the processus which engenders a step of progress are henceforth reducible into a series of explanations ; and up to a certain point we have under our eyes the schedule of all historical develop- ments, morphologically conceived. This doctrine is the clear and definite negation of all ideology, be- cause it is the explicit negation of every form of ra- tionalism, understanding by this word this concept, that things in their existence and their development answer to a norm, an ideal, a measure, an end, in an implicit or explicit fashion. The whole course of huma n events is a sum, a succession of series. of conditions which men have madejand Jajd„do_w_n_ for themselves through the experience accumulated in their changing social life, but it represents.neither the tendency to realize a predetermined end nor the. deviation of a first principle from perfection and fe- Jjcjty. ^Progress itself implies merely that empirical and circumstantial notion of a thing which is at 124 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. present defined in our mind, because, thanks to the development thus far realized, we are in a position to estimate the past and to foresee, at least in a cer- tain sense and in a certain measure, the future. V. In this fashion a serious ambiguity is dissolved and the errors carried with it are removed. Rea- sonable and well founded is the tendency of those who aim to subordinate the sum total of human events in their course to the rigorous conception of determinism. (There is, on the contrary, no rea- son for confusing this derived, reflex and complex determinism with the determinism of the immediate struggle for existence which is produced and de- veloped on a field not modified by the continued ac- tion of labor. ( Legitimate and well founded, in an absolute fashion, is the historical explanation which proceeds in its course from the volitions which have voluntarily regulated the different phases of life, to the motives and objective causes of every choice, discovered in the conditions of environment, terri- tory, accessible means of existence and conditions of experience. But there is, on the contrary, no foundation for that opinion which tends to the nega- tion of every volition by consequence of a theoretical view which would substitute automatism for volun- tarism. There is nothing in iti as a matter of fact, but a pure and simple conceit. I ._Wherever the means of production have devel- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 125 j)ped, to a certain point, wherever the artificial foun-" dation has acquired a certain consistency, and wher- ever the social differentiations and their resulting antitheses have created the need, the possibility and the conditions of an organization more or less sta- ble or unstable, there, always and necessarily, ap- pear premeditated designs, political views, plans of conduct, systems of law and finally maxims and gen- eral and abstract principles.^Jn the circle" of these products, and of these derived and complex devel- opments of the second degree, spring up also the sciences and arts, philosophy and learning, and his- tory as a literary fashion of production. This circle is what the rationalists and the ideologists, ignorant of its real foundations, have called, and call, in an exclusive fashion, civilization. And, in fact, it has happened, and it happens, that some men, and espe- cially professional scientists, lay or clerical, have found, and find, the means of intellectual livelihood in the closed circle of the reflex and secondary products of civilization, and that they have been able and are able consequently to submit all the rest to the subjective view which they have elaborated un- der these conditions ; that is, the origin and explana- tion of all the ideologies. f Our doctrine has defi- nitely outgrown the visual angle of ideology. The premeditated designs, the political views, sciences, systems of law, etc., instead of being the means and the instrument of the explanation of history, are precisely what require to be explained, because they are derived from determined conditions and situa- 126 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. tions. But that does not mean that they are pure appearances, soap bubbles. If they are things which have been developed and derived, that does not im- ply that they are not real things ; and that is so true that they have been, for centuries, to the unscientific consciousness, and to the scientific consciousness still on the way towards its formation, the only ones which really existed. But that is not all. Our doctrine, like others, may lead to reverie and offer an occasion and a theme for a new inverted ideology. It was born on the battlefield of com- munism. It assumes the appearance of the modern proletariat on the political stage, and it assumes that alignment upon the origins of our present society which has permitted us to reconstruct in a critical manner the whole genesis of the bourgeoisie. It is a doctrine revolutionary from two points of view-; because it has found the reasons and the methods of development of the proletarian revolution which is in the making, and because it proposes to find the causes and the conditions of development of all other social revolutions which have taken place in the past, in the class antagonisms which arrived at a certain critical point, by reason of the contradic- tion between the forms of production and the de- velopment of the producing forces. And this is not all. In the light of this doctrine what is essen- tial in history is summed up in these critical mo- ments, and it abandons, momentarily at least, what HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 127 unites these different moments to the learned min- istrations of the professional narrators. As a revo- lutionary doctrine it is, before all else, the intellect- ual consciousness of the actual proletarian move- ment in which, according to our assertion, the fu- ture of communism is preparing long beforehand; so much so that the open adversaries of socialism reject it as an opinion, which, under a scientific mask, is only working out another Utopia. Thus it may happen, and that has already re- sulted, that the imagination, of people unfamiliar with the difficulties of historic research, and the zeal of fanatics, find a stimulus and an opportunity even in historic materialism for forming a new ideology and drawing from it a new philosophy of syste- matic history, that is to say, history conceived as schemes or tendencies and designs. And no pre- caution can suffice. Our intellect is rarely con- tented with purely critical research; it is always^ attempting to convert into an element of pedantry and into a new scholasticism every discovery of thought. In a word, even the materialistic concep- tion of history may be converted into a form of ar- gumentation for a thesis and serve to make new fashions with the ancient prejudices like that of a history based on syllogisms, demonstrations and de- ductions. To guard against this, and especially to avoid the reappearance in an indirect and disguised fash- ion of any form whatever of finality, it is necessary to resolve positively upon two things : First, that 128 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. all known historic conditions are circumstanced, and, second, that progress has thus far been cir- cumscribed by various obstacles and that for this reason it has always been partial and limited. Only a part, and, until recent times, only a small part of the human race, has traversed completely all the stages of the processus by the effect of which the most advanced nations have arrived at modern civil society, with the advanced technical forms founded upon the discoveries of science and with all the consequences, political, intellectual, moral, etc., which correspond to this development. By the side of the English, — to take the most striking example — who, transporting European manners with them to New Holland, have created there a center of production which already holds a notable place in the competition of the world's market, there still live, like fossils of prehistoric times, the Australian aborigines, capable only of disappearing, but in- capable of adapting themselves to a civilization which was not imported among them, but next to them. In America, and especially in North Amer- ica, the series of events which have brought on the development of modern society began with the im- portation from Europe of domestic animals and ag- ricultural tools, the use of which in ancient times gave birth to the slow moving civilization of the Mediterranean; but this movement remained en- tirely inside the circle of those descended from the conquerors and colonists, while the aborigines are HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 129 lost in the mass through the intermingling of races or perish and disappear completely. Western Asia and Egypt, which already in very ancient times, as the first cradle of all our civilization, gave birth to the great semi-political formations which marked the first phases of certain and positive history, have appeared to us for centuries as crystallizations of social forms incapable of moving on of themselves to new phases of development. Upon them is the age-long weight of the barbaric camp — the domin- ion of the Turk. Into this stiffened mass is intro- duced by secret ways a modern administration, and in the name of business interests the railroads and the telegraphs push in, — bold outposts of the con- quering European bank. All this stiffened mass has no hope of resuming life, heat and motion ex- cept by the ruin of the Turkish dominion, for which are being substituted in the different methods of direct and indirect conquest the dominion and the protectorate of the European bourgeoisie. That a process of transformation of backward nations or of nations arrested in their march, can be realized and hastened under external influences, India stands as a proof. This country, with its own life still sur- viving, re-enters vigorously under the action of Eng- land into the circulation of international activity even with its intellectual products. These are not the only contrasts in the historic physiognomy of our contemporaries. And while in Japan, by an acute and spontaneous phenomenon of imitation, there has developed, in less than thirty years, a cer- 130 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. tain assimilation of western civilization which is al- ready moving normally the country's own energies, the forcible law of Russian conquest is dragging into the circle of modern industry, and even into great industry, certain notable portions of the coun- try beyond the Caspian, as an outpost of the ap- proaching acquisition to the sphere of capitalism of Central Asia and Upper Asia. The gigantic mass of China appeared to us but a few years ago as mo- tionless in the hereditary organization of its insti- tutions, so slow is every movement there, while for ethnic and geographical reasons almost all Africa remained impenetrable, and, it seemed, even up to the last attempts at conquest and colonization, that it was destined to offer only its borders to the pro- cess of civilization, as if we were still in the times not even of the Portuguese, but of the Greeks and Carthaginians. These differentiations of men on the track of writ- ten and unwritten history seem to us easily explica- ble when they can be referred to the natural and immediate conditions which impose limits upon the development of labor. This is the case with Amer- ica, which up to the arrival of the Europeans had but one cereal, maize, and but one domestic animal for labor, the llama, and we can rejoice that the Europeans imported with themselves and their tools the ox, the ass and the horse, corn, cotton, sugar- cane, coffee and finally the vine and the orange tree, creating there a new world of that glorious society which produces merchandise and which with an ex- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 131 traofdinary swiftness of movement has already tra- versed the two phases of the blackest slavery and the most democratic wage system. But where there is a real halt and even an attested retrogression, as in Western Asia, in Egypt, in the Balkan Penin- sula and in Northern Africa, — and this arrest can- not be attributed to the change of natural condi- tions, — we find the problem before us which is await- ing its solution from the direct and explicit study of the social structure studied in the internal modes of its development, as in the interfacings and compli- cations of the different nations upon that field which is ordinarily called the scene of historic struggles. This same civilized Europe, which by the con- tinuity of its tradition, presents the most complete diagram of its processus, so much so that upon this model have been conceived and constructed, thus far, all the systems of historical philosophy, this Western and Central Europe, which produced the epoch of the bourgeoisie and has sought and is seek- ing to impose that form of society upon the whole world by different modes of conquest, direct or in- direct, — this Europe is not completely uniform in the degree of its development, and its various ag- glomerations, national, local and political, appear disturbed, as it were, over a decidedly sloping lad- der. Upon these differences depend the conditions of relative superiority and inferiority of one coun- try to another and the reasons, more or less ad- vantageous or disadvantageous, for economic ex- 132 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. change; and thereon have depended, and still de- pend, not only the frictions and the struggles, the treaties and the wars, but also everything that with more or less precision the political writers have been able to relate to us since the Renaissance, and certainly with increasing evidence, from Louis XIV. and Colbert to our own time. This Europe in itself is highly variegated. Here is the consummate flower of industrial and capitalist production, namely, England, while at other points survives the artisan, vigorous or rickety, at Paris and at Naples, to grasp the fact in its extreme points. Here the land is almost industrialized, as in Eng- land ; and elsewhere vegetates, in various traditional forms, the stupid peasant, as in Italy and in Austria, and in the latter country more than in the former. In one country the political life of the state — suited to the prosaic consciousness of a bourgeoisie which knows its business because it has conquered the space that it occupies — is exerted in the surest and most open fashion of an explicit class domination (it will be understood that I am speaking of France). Else- where, and particularly in Germany, the old feudal customs, the hypocrisy of Protestantism and the cowardice of a bougeoisie which exploits favorable economic circumstances without bringing to them either intelligence or revolutionary courage, strengthen the existing state by preserving the lying appearances of an ethical mission to be accom- plished. (With how many unpalatable sauces this state ethics, Prussian into the bargain, has been HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 133 served up by the heavy and pedantic German pro- fessors !) Here and there modern capitalist produc- tion is edging its way into countries which from other points of view do not enter into our move- ment and especially into its political side, as is the case with unhappy Poland ; or again this form only penetrates indirectly, as in the Slavonic countries. But now comes the sharpest contrast, which seems destined to put under our eyes, as in an epitome, all the phrases, even the most extreme, of our history. Russia could not have advanced, as it is now ad- vancing, toward the great industry, without draw- ing from Western Europe, and especially from our charming French Chauvinism, that money which she would in vain have sought within her own bor- ders, that is to say, from the conditions of her obese territorial mass, where vegetate in ancient economic forms fifty million peasants. Russia, in order to become an economic modern society ripening the conditions of a corresponding political revolution, and preparing the means which will facilitate the addition of a large part of Asia to the capitalist movement, has been led to destroy the last relics of agrarian communism (whether its origins be primi- tive or secondary) which had been preserved within herself up to this point in such characteristic forms and on so large a scale. Russia must capitalize her- self, and to this end she must, to start with, con- vert land into merchandise capable of producing merchandise, and at the same time transform into miserable proletarians the excommunists of the land. 134 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. And, on the contrary, in Western and Central Eu- rope we find ourselves at the opposite point of the series of development which has scarcely begun in Russia. Here, with us, where the bourgeoisie, with varied fortunes and triumphing over such a variety of difficulties, has already traversed so many stages of its development, it is not the recollection of primitive or secondary communism, which scarcely survives through learned combinations in the heads of scholars, but the very form of bourgeois produc- tion, which engenders in the proletarians the ten- dency to socialism, which presents itself in its gen- eral outlines as an indication of a new phase of his- tory and not as the repetition of what is inevitably perishing in the Slavonic countries under our eyes. Who could fail to see in these illustrations, which I have not sought out, but which have come almost by chance, and which can be indefinitely prolonged in a volume of economic-political geography of the present world, the evident proof of the manner in which historic conditions are all circumstanced in the forms of their development? Not only races and peoples, nations and states, but parts of na- tions and various regions of states, even orders and classes, are found, as it were, upon so many rounds of a very long ladder, or, rather, upon the various points of a complicated and slowly developing curve. Historic time has not marched uniformly for all men. The simple succession of generations has never been the index of the constancy and intensity HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 135 of the processus. Time as an abstract measure of chronology and the generations which succeed one another in approximate periods give no criterion and furnish no indication of law or of process. The developments thus far have been varied because the things accomplished in one and the same unit of time were varied. Between thess varied forms of development there is an affinity or rather a simil- arity of movements, that is, an analogy of type, or again an identity of form; thus the advance forms may by simple contact or by violence accelerate the development of backward forms. But the impor- tant thing is to comprehend that progress, our no- tion of which is not merely empirical, but always circumstanced and thus limited, is not suspended over the course of human events like a destiny or a fate, nor like a commandment. And for this reason our doctrine cannot serve to represent the whole his- tory of the human race in a unified perspective which repeats, mutatis mutandis, the historic philosophy from thesis to conclusion, from St. Augustine to Hegel, or, better, from the prophet Daniel to M. De Rougemont. Our doctrine does not pretend to be the intellectual vision of a great plan or of a design, but it is merely a method of research and of conception. It" is not by accident that Marx spoke of his discovery as a guiding thread, and it is precisely for this rea- son that it is analogous to Darwinism, which also is a method, and is not and cannot be a modern repe- 136 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. tition of the constructed or constructive natural philosophy as used by Shelling and his school. The first to discover in the notion of progress an indication of something circumstantial and rela- tive was the genial Saint Simon, who opposed his way of seeing to the doctrine of the eighteenth cen- tury represented by the party of Con'dorcet. To that doctrine, which may be called unitary, equali- tarian, formal, because it regards the human race as developing upon one line of process, Saint Simon opposes the conception of the faculties and of the aptitudes which substitute themselves and compen- sate for each other, and thus he remains an ideolo- gist. To penetrate the true reasons for the relativity of progress another thing was necessary. It was necessary, first of all, to renounce those prejudices which are involved in the belief that the obstacles to the uniformity of human development rest exclu- sively upon natural and immediate causes. These natural obstacles are either sufficiently problemat- ical, as is the case with races, no one of which shows the privilege of birth in its history, or they aje, as is the case in geographical differences, insufficient to explain the development of the completely differ- ent historico-social conditions on one and the same geographical field. And as the historic movement dates precisely from the time when the natural ob- stacles have already been in great part either van- quished or notably circumscribed, thanks to the crea- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 137 tion of an artificial field upon which it has been given to men to develop themselves further, it is evident that the successive obstacles to the uniformity of progress must be sought in the proper and intrinsic conditions of the social structure itself. This structure has thus far started in forms 01 political organization, the object of which is to try to hold in equilibrium the economic inequalities; consequently this organization, as I have said more than once, is constantly unstable. From the point where there is a known history, it is the history of society tending to form the state, or having already constructed it completely. And the state is this struggle, within and without, because it is, above all, the organ and the instrument of a larger or smaller part of society against all the rest of so- ciety itself, in so far as the latter rests upon the economic domination of man over man in a more or less direct and explicit fashion, according as the different degree of the development of production, of its natural means and its artificial instruments, requires either chattel slavery, or the serfdom of the soil, or the "free" wage system. This society of antitheses, which forms a state, is always, although in different forms and various modes, the opposi- tion of the city to the country, of the artisan to the peasant, of the proletarian to the employer, of the capitalist to the laborer, and so on ad infinitum, and it always ends, with various complications and va- rious methods, in an hierarchy, whether it be in a fixed scaffolding of privilege, as in the Middle Ages, 138 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. or whether, under the disguised forms of supposed equal rights for all, it be produced by the auto- matic action of economic competition, as in our time. To this economic hierarchy corresponds, accord- ing to various modes, in different countries, in dif- ferent times, in different places, what I may call al- most a hierarchy of souls, of intellects, of minds. That is to say, that culture, which, for the idealists, constitutes the sum of progress, lias been and is by the necessities of the case very unequally distributed. The greater portion of mankind, by the quality of their occupations, are composed of individuals who are disintegrated, broken into fragments and ren- dered incapable of a complete and normal develop- ment. To the economics of classes and to the hier- archy of social positions corresponds the psychology of classes. The relativity of progress is then for us the inevitable consequence of class distinctions. These distinctions constitute the obstacles which ex- plain the possibility of relative retrogression, up to the point of degeneracy and of the dissolution of an entire society. The machines, which mark the triumph of science, become, by reason of the anti- thetic conditions of the social plexus, instruments which impoverish millions and millions of artisans and free peasants. The progress of technique, which fills the towns with merchandise, makes more miser- able and abject the condition of the peasants, and in the cities themselves it further humbles the condi- tion of the humble. All the progress of science has served thus far to differentiate a class of scientists HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 139 and to keep ever further from culture the masses who, attached to their ceaseless daily toil, are thus feeding the whole of society. Progress has been and is, up to the present time, partial and one-sided. The minorities which share in it call this human progress ; and the proud evolu- tionists call this human nature which is developing. All this partial progress, which has thus far de- veloped upon the oppression of man by man, has its foundation in the conditions of opposition, by which economic distinctions have engendered all the so- cial distinctions; from the relative liberty of the few is born the servitude of the greater number, and law has been the protector of injustice. Prog- ress, thus seen and clearly appreciated, appears to us as the moral and intellectual epitome of all hu- man miseries and of all material inequalities. To discover this inevitable relativity it was neces- sary that communism, born at first as an instinctive movement in the soul of the oppressed, should be- come a science and a political party. It was then necessary that our doctrine should give the measure of value for all past history, by discovering in every form of social organization, antithetical in its or- igin and organization, as they have all been up to this time, the innate incapacity for producing the conditions of a universal and uniform human prog- ress, that is to say, by discovering the fetters which turn each benefit into an injury. 140 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. VI. There is one question which we cannot evade: What has given birth to the belief in historic fac- tors? That is an expression familiar to many and often found in the writings of many scholars, scientists and philosophers, and of those commentators who, by their reasonings or by their combinations, add a little to simple historic narration and utilize this opinion as an hypothesis to find a starting point in the immense mass of human facts, which, at first sight and after first examination, appear so con- fused and irreducible. This belief, this current opin- ion, has 1 become for reasoning historians, or even for rationalists, a semi-doctrine, which has recently been urged several times, as a decisive argument, against the unitary theory of the materialistic con- ception. And indeed, this belief is so deeply rooted and this opinion so widespread, of history being only intelligible as the juncture and the meeting of various factors, that, in consequence, many of those who speak of social materialism, whether they be its partisans or adversaries, believe that they save themselves from embarrassment by affirming that this whole doctrine consists in the fact that it at- tributes the preponderance or the decisive action to the economic factor. It is very important to take account of the fashion in which this belief, this opinion, or this semi-doc- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 141 trine takes its rise^ because real and fruitful criti- cism consists principally in knowing and understand- ing the motive of what we declare an error. It does not suffice to reject an opinion by characterizing it as false doctrine. Error always arises from some ill-understood side of an incomplete experience, or from some subjective imperfection. It does not suf- fice to reject the error; we must overcome it, ex- plain it and outgrow it. Every historian, at the beginning of his work, performs, so to speak, an act of elimination. First, he makes erasures, as it were, in a continuous series of events; then he dispenses with numerous and varied suppositions and precedents ; more than this, he tears up and decomposes a complicated tissue. Thus, to begin with, he must fix a point, a line, a boundary, as he chooses ; he must say, for example : I wish to relate the beginning of the war between the Greeks and the Persians, or to inquire how Louis XVI. was brought to convene the States Gen- eral. The narrator finds himself, in a word, con- fronted with a complexus of accomplished facts and of facts on the point of being produced, which in their totality present a certain aspect. Upon the attitude which he takes depends the form and the style of every narration, because to compose it he must take his point of departure from things al- ready accomplished, in order to see henceforth how they have continued to develop. Yet into this complexus he must introduce a cer- tain degree of analysis, resolving it into groups and U2 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. into aspects of facts, or into concurrent elements, which afterwards appear at a certain moment as in- dependent categories. It is the state in a certain form and with certain powers; it is the laws, which determine, by what they command or what they prohibit, certain relations; it is the manners and customs which reveal to us tendencies, needs, ways of thinking, of believing, of imagining; alto- gether it is a multitude of men living and working together, with a certain distribution of tasks and oc- cupations ; he observes then the thoughts, the ideas, the inclinations, the passions, the desires, the aspira- tions which arise and develop from this varied mode of coexistence and from its frictions. Let a change be produced, and it will show itself in one of the sides or one of the aspects of the empirical com- plexus, or in all of these within a longer or a shorter time; for example, the state extends its boundaries, or changes its internal limits as regards society by increasing or diminishing its powers and its attrib- utes, or by changing the mode of action of one or the other ; or, again, the law modifies its dispositions, or it expresses and affirms itself through new organs ; or, again, finally, behind the change of exterior and daily habits, we discover a change in the sentiments, the thoughts and the inclinations of the men va- riously distributed in the different social classes, who mingle, change, replace each other, disappear or reappear. All this may be sufficiently understood, in its exterior forms and outlines, through the usual endowments of normal intelligence which is not yet HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 143 aided, corrected or completed by science strictly so- called. Assembling within precise limits a concep- tion of such facts is the true and proper object of narration, which is so much the clearer, more vivid and more exact, as it takes the form of a mono- graph; witness Thucydides in the Peloponnesian war. Society already evolved in a certain fashion, so- ciety already arrived at a certain degree of develop- ment, society already so complicated that it conceals the economic substructure which supports all the rest, has not revealed itself to the simple narrators, except in these visible facts, in these most apparent results, and in these most significant symptoms which are the political forms, the legal dispositions and the partisan passions. The narrator, both be- cause he lacks any theoretical doctrine regarding the true sources of the historic movement, and by the very attitude which he takes on the subject of the things which he unites according to the appearances which they have come to assume, cannot reduce them to unity, unless it be as a result of a single, im- mediate intuition, and if he is an artist, this intuition takes on a color in his mind and transforms itself there into dramatic action. His task is finished if he succeeds in massing a certain number of facts and events in certain limits and confines over which the observer may look as on a clear perspective; in the same way, purely descriptive geography has ac- complished its task, if it sums up in a vivid and clear design a concourse of physical causes which deter- 144 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. mine the immediate aspect of the Gulf of Naples, for example, without going back to its genesis. It is in this need of graphic narration that arises the first intuitive, palpable, and, I might almost say, aesthetic and artistic occasion for all those abstrac- tions and those generalizations, which are finally summed up in the semi-doctrine of the so-called factors. Here are two notable men, the Gracchi, who wished to put an end to the process of appropria- tion of the public land and to prevent the agglom- eration of the latifundium, which was diminishing or causing to completely disappear the class of small proprietors, that is to say, of the free men, who are the foundation and the condition of the democratic life of the ancient city. What were the causes of their failure? Their aim is clear, their spirit, their origin, their character, their heroism are manifest. They have against them other men with other in- terests and with other designs. The struggle ap- pears to the mind at first merely as a struggle of in- tentions and passions, which unfolds and comes to an end by the aid of means which are permitted by the political form of the state and by the use or abuse or the public powers. Here is the situation: the city ruling in different manners over other cities or over territories which have lost all character of au- tonomy ; within this city a very decided differentia- tion between rich and poor; and facing the com- paratively small group of the oppressors and the all- powerful, stands the immense mass of the proleta- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 145 rians, who are on the point of losing or who have already lost the consciousness and the political strength of a body of citizens, the mass which there- fore suffers itself to be deceived and corrupted, and which will soon decay till it is but a servile acces- sory to its aristocratic exploiters. There is the ma- terial of the narrator, and he cannot take account of the fact otherwise than in the immediate conditions of the fact itself. The complete whole is directly seen and forms the stage on which the events unfold, but if the narration is to have solidity, vividness and perspective there must be points of departure and ways of interpretation. In this consists the first origin of those abstrac- tions, which little by little take away from the dif- ferent parts of a given social complexus their qual- ity of simple sides or aspects of a whole, and it is their ensuing generalization which little by little leads to the doctrine of factors. These factors, to express it in another way, arise in the mind as a sequence of the abstraction and generalization of the immediate aspects of the ap- parent movement, and they have an equal value with that of all other empirical concepts. Whatever be the domain of knowledge in which they arise, they persist until they are reduced and eliminated by a new experience, or until they are absorbed by a conception more general, genetic, evolutionary or dialetic. Was it not necessary that in the empir- ical analysis and in the immediate study of the 146 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. causes and the effects of certain definite phenomena, for example the phenomena of heat, the mind should first stop at this presumption and this persuasion, that it could and should attribute them to a subject, which if it was never for any physicist a true and substantial entity, was certainly considered as a defi- nite and specific force, namely, heat. Now we see that at a given moment, as a result of new experi- ences, this heat is resolved in given conditions into a certain quantity of motion. Still further, our thought is now on the way toward resolving all these physical factors into the flux of one universal energy, in which the hypotheses of the atoms, in the extent to which it is necessary, loses all residue of metaphysical survival. Was it not inevitable, as a first step of knowledge in what concerns the problem of life, to spend a con- siderable time in the separate study of the organs and to reduce them to systems ? Without this anat- omy, which seems too material and too gross, no progress in these studies would have been possible ; and nevertheless, above the unknown genesis and co-ordination of such an analytic multiplicity, there were evolving, uncertain and vague, the generic conceptions of life, soul, etc. In these mental cre- ations have long been seen that biological unity which has finally found its object in the certain be- ginning of the cell and in its processus of imma- nent multiplication. More difficult certainly was the way which the thought had to traverse to reconstruct the genesis of HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 147 all the facts of psychic life, from the most elemen- tary successions up to the most complex derived products. Not only for reasons of theoretical dif- ficulties, but in consequence of popular prejudices, the unity and continuity of psychic phenomena ap- peared, up to the time of Herbart, as separated and divided into so many factors, faculties of the soul. The interpretation of the historico-social pro- cessus met the same difficulties ; it also was obliged to stop at first in the provisional view of factors. And that being so, it is easy for us now to find again the first origin of that opinion in the necessity that the historians have of finding in the facts that they relate with more or less artistic talent and in differ- ent professional views, certain points of immediate orientation, such as may be offered by the study of the apparent movement of human events. But in this apparent movement, there are the ele- ments of a more exact view. These concurrent fac- tors, which abstract thought conceives and then iso- lates, have never been seen acting each for itself. On the contrary, they act in such a manner that it gives birth to the concept of reciprocal action. More- over, these factors themselves arise at a given mo- ment, and it is not until later that they acquired that physiognomy which they have in the particular nar- ration. This State, it is well known, arose at a given moment. As for every rule of law, it may either be remembered or conjectured that it went into effect under such or such circumstances. As 148 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. for many customs, it may be remembered that they were introduced at a given moment ; and the simplest comparisons of the facts in different times or differ- ent places would show how society, as a whole, and in its character of being an aggregation of different classes, had taken and took continuously various forms. The reciprocal action of the different factors, without which not even the simplest narration would be possible, like the more or less exact information upon the origins and the variations of the factors themselves, called for research and thought more than did the constructive narration of those great historians who are real artists. And, in effect, the problems which arise spontaneously from the data of history, combined with other theoretical elements, gave birth to the v different so-called practical dis- ciplines, which in a more or less rapid fashion and with varying success, have developed from the an- cients up to our days, from ethics to the philosophy of law, from politics to sociology, from law to economics. Now with the rise and formation of so many dis- ciplines, through the inevitable division of labor, points of view have been multiplied out of all pro- portion. It is certain that for the first and immedi- ate analysis of the multiple aspects of the social complexus, a long labor of partial abstraction was necessary : which has always inevitably resulted in one-sided views. This can be shown, in a clearer and more evident manner than for any other do- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 149 main, in that of law and its various generalizations, including the philosophy of law. By reason of these abstractions, which are inevitable in particular and empirical analysis, and by the effect of the division of labor, the different sides and different manifesta- tions of the social complexus were, from time to time, fixed and stratified in general conceptions and categories. The works, the effects, the emanations, the effusions of human activity, — law, economic forms, principles of conduct, etc., — were, so to speak, translated and transformed into laws, into imperatives and into principles which remained placed above man himself. And from time to time it has been necessary to discover anew this simple truth : that the only permanent and sure fact, that is to say, the only datum from which departs and to which returns every practical detail of discipline, is men grouped in a determined social form by means of determined connections. The different analytical disciplines, which illustrate the facts that develop in history, have finally given rise to the need of a common and general social science, which renders possible the unification of the historic processus, and the materialistic doctrine marks precisely the final term, the apex of this unification. But that has not been, nor ever will be, lost time which is expended in the preliminary and lateral analysis of complex facts. To the methodical divi- sion of labor we owe precise learning, that is to say, the mass of knowledge passed into the sieve, systematized, without which social history would al- 150 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. ways be wandering in a purely abstract domain, in questions of form and terminology. The separate study of the historico-social factors has served, like any other empirical study which does not transcend the apparent movement of things, to improve the instrument of observation and to permit us to find again in the facts themselves, which have been arti- ficially abstracted, the keystones which bind them into the social complexus. The different disciplines which are considered as isolated and independent in the hypotheses of the concurrent factors in the for- mation of history, both by reason of the degree of development which they have reached, the materials which they have gathered, and the methods which they have elaborated, have to-day become quite in- dispensable for us, if one desires to reconstruct any portion out of past times. Where would our his- toric science be without the one-sidedness of philol- ogy, which is the fundamental instrument of all re- search, and where should we have found the guiding thread of a history of juridical institutions, which returns again from itself to so many other facts and to so many other combinations, without the obstinate faith of the Romanists in the universal excellence of the Roman law, which engendered with generalized law and with the philosophy of law so many prob- lems which serve as points of departure for sociol- ogy? It is thus, after all, that the historic factors, of which so many speak, and which are mentioned in so HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 151 many works, indicate something which is much less than the truth, but much more than simple error, in the ordinary sense of a blunder, of an illusion. They are the necessary product of a knowledge which is in the course of development and forma- tion. They arise from the necessity of finding a point of departvtre in the confused spectacle which human events present to him who wishes to narrate them ; and they serve thenceforth, so to speak, as a title, category or index to that inevitable division of labor, by the extension of which the historico-social material has, up to this time, been theoretically elab- orated. In this domain of knowledge, as well as in that of the natural sciences, the unity of real princi- ple and the unity of formal treatment are never found at the first start, but only after a long and troublous road. So that again from this point of view the analogy affirmed by Engels between the discovery of historical materialism and that of the conservation of energy appears to us excellent. The provisional orientation, according to the con- venient system of what are called factors, may, under given circumstances, be useful also to us who profess an altogether unitary principle of historic interpretation, if we do not wish simply to rest in the domain of theory, but wish to illustrate, through personal research, a definite period of history. As in that case we must proceed to direct and detailed re- search, we must first of all follow the groups of facts that seem pre-eminent, independent, or detached in the aspects of immediate experience. We should not 152 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. imagine, in fact, that the unitary principle so well established, at which we have arrived in the general conception of history, may, like a talisman, act al- ways and at first sight, as an infallible method of resolving into simple elements the immense area and the complicated gearing of society ./ /The underlying economic structure, which determines all the rest, is not a simple mechanism whence emerge, as im- mediate, automatic and mechanical effects, institu- tions, laws, customs, thoughts, sentiments, ideologies. From this substructure to all the rest, the process of derivation and of mediation is very complicated, often subtile, tortuous and not always legible. ] The social organization is, as we already know, constantly unstable, although that does not seem evi- dent to every one, except at the time when the insta- bility enters upon that acute period which is called a revolution. This instability, with the constant struggles in the bosom of that same organized so- ciety, excludes the possibility for men coming to an agreement which might involve a new start at living an animal life. It is the anta gonisms whic h are the, principal cause of progress (M arx). But__it.J§ equally true, notwithstanding, that in this unstable organization, in which is given to us the inevitable form of domination and subjection, intelligence is always developed not only unequally, but quite im- perfectly, incongruously and partially. There has been and there is still in society what we may call a hierarchy of intelligence, sentiments and conceptions. To suppose that men, always and in all cases, have HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 153 had an approximately clear consciousness of their own situation, and of what was the most rational thing to do, is to suppose the improbable and, in- deed, the unreal. Forms of law, political acts and attempts at social organization were, and they still are, sometimes for- tunate, sometimes mistaken, that is to say, dispropor- tionate and unsuitable. History is full of errors; and this means that if all was necessary, granted the relative intelligence of those who have to solve a difficulty or to find a solution for a given problem, etc., if everything in it has a sufficient reason, yet everything in it was not reasonable, in the sense which the optimists give to this word. To state it more fully, the determined causes of all changes, that is to say the modified economic conditions, have ended and end by causing to be found, sometimes through tortuous ways, the suitable forms of law, the appropriate political orders and the more or less perfect means of social adjustment. But it must not be thought that the instinctive wisdom of the reason- ing animal has been manifested, or is manifested, definitely and simply, in the complete and clear un- derstanding of all situations, and that we have left only the very simple task of following the deduc- tive road from the economic situation to all the rest. Ignorance — which, in its turn, may be explained — is an important reason for the manner in which his- tory is made; and, to ignorance we must add the brutishness which is never completely subdued and all the passions, and all the injustices, and the va- 154 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. rious forms of corruption, which were and are the necessary product of a society organized in such a way, that the domination of man over man in it is inevitable, and that from this domination falsehood, hypocrisy, presumption and baseness were and are inseparable. We may, without being Utopians, but simply because we are critical communists, foresee, as we do in fact foresee, the coming of a society which, developing from the present society and from its very contrasts by the laws inherent in its historic development, will end in an association without class antagonisms ; which will have for its consequence that regulated production will eliminate from life the element of chance which, thus far, has been re- vealed in history as a multiform cause of accidents and incidents. But that is the future, and it is neither the present nor the past. If we propose to ourselves, on the contrary, to penetrate into the his- toric events which have developed up to our own times, by taking, as we do, for a guiding thread the variations of the forms of the underlying economic structure up to the simplest datum in the variations of the tool of production, we must become fully conscious of the difficulty of the problem which we are setting ourselves : because here we have not merely to open our eyes and behold, but to make a supreme effort of thought, with the aim of triumph- ing over the multiform spectacle of immediate -ex- perience to reduce its elements into a genetic series. That is why I said that, in particular investigations, we must ourselves start from those groups of ap- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 155 patently isolated facts, and from this heterogeneous mass, in a word, from that empirical study, whence arose the belief in factors, which afterwards became a semi-doctrine. It is useless to attempt at counterbalancing these essential difficulties by the metaphorical hypothesis, often equivocal, and after all of a purely analogical value, of the so-called social organism. It was nec- essary too that the mind should pass through even this hypothesis, which so shortly became phraseology pure and simple. It indeed prepares the way for the comprehension of the historic movement as springing from the laws immanent in society itself, and thereby excludes the arbitrary, the transcenden- tal and the irrational. But the metaphor has no further application; and the particular, critical and circumstantial research into historic facts is the sole source of that concrete and positive knowledge which is necessary to the complete development of economic materialism. VII. Ideas do not fall from heaven, and nothing comes to us in a dream. The change in the ways of think- ing, lately produced by the historic doctrine which we are here examining and commenting upon, takes place at first slowly and afterwards with an increas- ing rapidity, precisely in that period of human de- velopment, in which were realized the great politico- economic revolutions, that is to* say, in that epoch 156 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. which, considered in its political forms, is called lib- eral, but which, considered in its basis, by reason of the domination of capital over the proletarian mass, is the epoch of anarchical production. The change in ideas, even to the' creation of new methods of conception, has reflected little by little the experi- ence of a new life. This, in the revolutions of the last two centuries, was little by little despoiled of the mythical, religious and mystical envelopes in proportion as it acquired the practical and precise consciousness of its immediate and direct conditions. Human thought, also, which sums up this life and theorizes upon it, has little by little been plundered, of its theological and metaphysical hypotheses to take refuge finally in this prosaic assertion: in the interpretation of history we must limit ourselves to the objective co-ordination of the determining condi- tions and of the determined effects. The materialis- tic conception marks the culminating point of this new tendency in the investigation of the historic- social laws, in so far as it is not a particular case of a generic sociology, or of a generic philosophy of the State, of law, and of history, but the solution of all doubts and all uncertainties which accompany the other forms of philosophizing upon human af- fairs, and the beginning of their integral interpreta- tion. It is thus an easy thing, especially in the way it has been done by certain shallow critics, to find precur- sors for Marx and Engels, who first defined this doctrine in its fundamental points. And when did it HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 157 ever occur to any of their disciples, even of the strict- est school, to represent these two thinkers as mira- cle-workers ? What is more, if we wish to go on a search after the premises of the logical creation of Marx and Engels, it will not suffice to stop at those who are called the precursors of socialism, Saint- Simon for example, and his predecessors, or the philosophers, particularly Hegel, or the economists who had laid bare the anatomy of the society which produces commodities ; we must go back to the very formation of modern society, and then at last declare triumphantly that the theory is a plagarism from the things that it explains. The truth is that the real precursors of the new doctrine were the facts of modern history, which has become so transparent and so explanatory of itself since the accomplishment in England of the great industrial revolution at the end of the eigh- teenth century, and since the great social upheaval took place in France. These things, mutatis mutan- dis, have subsequently been reproduced, in various combinations and in milder forms, throughout the whole civilized world. And what else is our thought at bottom if not the conscious and systematic com- plement of experience, and what is this last if not the reflection and the mental elaboration of the things and the processes which arise and unfold either outside our volition, or through the work of our activity ; and what is genius but the individual- ized, derived and acute form of thought, which arises through the suggestion of experience, in many 158 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. men of the same epoch, but which remains in most of them fragmentary, incomplete, uncertain, waver- ing and partial ? Ideas do not fall from heaven ; and what is more, like the other products of human activity, they are formed in given circumstances, in the precise full- ness of time, through the action of definite needs, thanks to the repeated attempts at their satisfaction, and by the discovery of such and such other means of proof which are, as it were, the instruments of their production and their elaboration. Even ideas involve a basis of social conditions ; they have their technique ; thought also is a form of work. To rob the one and the other, ideas and thought, of the conditions and environment of their birth and their development, is to disfigure their nature and their meaning. To show how the materialistic conception of his- tory arises precisely in given conditions, not as a personal and tentative opinion of two writers, but as the new conquest of thought by the inevitable sug- gestion of a new world which is in process of birth, that is to say the proletarian revolution, that was the object of my first essay, "In Memory of the Com- munist Manifesto." That is, to repeat, a new his- toric situation found its complement in its appro- priate mental instrument. To imagine now that this intellectual production might have been realized at any time and at any place, would be to take absurdity for the ruling HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 159 principle in research. To transport ideas arbitrarily from the basis and the historic conditions in which they arise to any other basis whatever, is like taking the irrational for the basis of reasoning. Why should one not fancy equally that the ancient city, in which arose Greek art and science and Roman law, remaining all the while an ancient democratic city, with slavery, might at the same time acquire and develop all the conditions of modern technique ? Why not believe that the trade guild of the Middle Ages, remaining all the while on its inflexible mould, should take its way to the conquest of the world market without the conditions of unlimited compe- tition, which actually began by its destruction and negation? Why not imagine a fief which, remain- ing a fief all the while, should become a factory pro- ducing commodities exclusively? Why could not Michel de Lando have written the Communist Man- ifesto ? Why could we not also believe that the dis- coveries of modern science could have proceeded from the brains of men of no matter what other time and place, that is to say, before determined condi- tions had given rise to determined needs, and before repeated and accumulated experiences should have provided for the satisfaction of these needs ? Our doctrine assu mes the broad, conscio us and continuous development of modern technique, and with it that society which produces commodities in the antagonisms of competition, that society which as a first condition and an indispensable means for its own perpetuation presupposes capitalist accumu- 160 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. lation in the form of privajte_j^oj^rtvj_th^._spxietj_- which continually produces and reproduces proleta- rians, and which if it is to perpetuate itself, must incessantly revolutionize its tools, and with jthem the State and its legal gearings. This society, which, by the very laws of its movement, has laid bare its own anatomy, produces by its reaction the material- istic conception. Even as it has produced in social- ism its positive negation, so it has engendered in the new historic doctrine its ideal negation. If h is- tory is the product, not arbitrary, but necessary and normal, of men in so far as they are developing, and if they are developing i n so far as they are mak- ing social experiments, and if they are experiment- ing in so far as they aremaking improvements in their labor, which accumulate and preserve prod- ucts and results, the phase of development in which we live cannot be the last and final phase, and the contrasts which are intimately bound to it and in- herent in it are the productive forces of new condi- tions. And this is how the period of the great econ- omic and political revolutions of these last two cen- turies has ripened in the mind these two concepts: the immanence and constancy of the processus in historic facts, and the materialist doctrine, which is at bottom the objective theory of social revolutions. It is beyond doubt that to reascend through the centuries and reconstruct in our thought the devel- opment of social ideas to the extent that we find their documents in writers, is something always very instructive, and serving especially to add to our HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 161 critical knowledge of our concepts as of our ways of thinking. Such a return of the mind over its his- toric premises, when it does not lead us astray into the empiricism of a boundless erudition, and does not lead us to set up hastily vain analogies, serves without any doubt to give suppleness and a persua- sive force to the forms of our scientific activity. In the sum of our science we find again, in fact and through the approximative continuity of tradition, the excellence of all that has been found, conceived and proved, not only in modern times but even in ancient Greece, where first begins precisely and in a definite fashion for the human race the orderly de- velopment of conscious, reflective and methodical thought. It would be impossible to take a single step in scientific research without employing means long ago found and tried, such for example as logic and mathematics. To think otherwise would be to assume that each generation must begin over again all the work done since the childhood of humanity. But it was not given either to the ancient authors in the limited circle of their urban republics, nor to the writers of the Renaissance, always drifting between an imaginary return to antiquity and the need of grasping intellectually the new world in pro- cess of birth, to arrive at the precise analysis of the last elements from which society results, and which the incomparable genius of Aristotle did not see, and did not understand beyond the limits within which passes the life of the typical citizen. The investigation of the social structure, consid- 162 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. ered in its manners of origin and processus, became active and penetrating and took on multiform as- pects in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, when economics took shape and when under the different names of "Natural Rights," "The Spirit of the Laws," or "The Social Contract," it was attempt- ed to resolve into causes, into factors and into logical and psychological data, the multiform and often obscure spectacle of a life in which was preparing the greatest revolution ever known. These doctrines, whatever may have been the subjective intention and spirit of the authors — as in the contrasting cases of the conservative Hobbes and the proletarian Rous- seau — were all revolutionary in their substance and their effects. Under all of them is always found, as a stimulus and motive, the material and moral needs of a new age, which, by reason of historic conditions, were those of the bourgeoisie. Thus it was neces- sary to wage war in the name of liberty upon tra- dition, the Church, privileges, fixed classes, that is to say, the orders and conditions, and consequently upon the State which was or appeared to be their author, and then upon the special privileges of com- merce, the arts, labor and science. And man was studied in an abstract fashion, that is to say, individ- uals taken separately, emancipated and delivered by a logical abstraction from their historic connection and from every social necessity : in the mind of many the concept of society was reduced to atoms, and it even seemed natural to the greatest number to be- lieve that society is only the sum of the individuals HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 163 composing it. The abstract categories of individual psychology sufficed for the explanation of all human facts ; and this is how in all these systems, nothing is spoken of but fear, self-love, egoism, voluntary obe- dience, tendency toward happiness, the original goodness of man, the freedom of contract and of the moral consciousness, and of the moral instinct or sense, and also many other similar abstract and generic things, as if they were sufficient to explain history, and to create a new history out of its frag- ments. By the fact that all society was entering upon an acute crisis, its horror at the antique, at what was superannuated, at what was traditional and had been organized for centuries, and the presentiment of a renovation of all human life, finally produced a total eclipse of the ideas of historic necessity and social necessity, that is to say, of those ideas which, barely indicated by the ancient philosophers, and so developed in our century, had at this period of revo- lutionary rationalism only rare representatives, like Vico, Montesquieu, and, in part, Quesnay. In this historic situation, which gave birth to a literature that was nimble, destructive and very popular, is found the reason for what Louis Blanc with a cer- tain emphasis has called individualism. Later some have thought they saw in this word the expression of a permanent fact in human nature, which espe- cially might serve as a decisive argument against so- cialism. A singular spectacle, and a singular contrast ! Cap- 164 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. ital, however produced, tended to overcome all pre- vious forms of production, and, breaking every bond and boundary, to become the direct or indirect mas- ter of society, as, in fact, it has become in the greater part of the world ; hence it resulted, that apart from all forms of modern misery and the new hierarchy in which we live, there was realized the most acute antithesis of all history, that is to say, the existing anarchy of production in the whole of society, and an iron despotism in the mode of production in each workshop and each factory! And the thinkers, the philosophers, the economists and the popularizers of the eighteenth century saw nothing but liberty and equality ! All reasoned in the same way ; all started from the same premises, which brought them to con- clude that liberty must be obtained from a govern- ment of pure administration, or that they were dem- ocrats or even communists. The approaching reign of liberty was before the eyes of all as a certain event, provided they could suppress the bonds and fetters which forced ignorance and the despotism of church and state had imposed upon men, good by nature. These fetters did not appear to be conditions and boundaries within which men were found by the laws of their development, and by the effect of the antagonistic and thus uncertain and tortuous move- ment of history, but simply obstacles from which the methodical use of reason was to deliver us. In this idealism, which reached its culminating point in certain heroes of the French Revolution, is the seed of a limitless faith in the certain progress of the HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 165 whole human race. For the first time, the concept of humanity appeared in all its branches, unmingled with religious ideas or hypotheses. The boldest of these idealists were the extreme materialists, be- cause, denying every religious fiction, they assigned this earth as a certain domain to the necessity of happiness provided that reason might open the way. Never were ideas abused in so inhuman a fashion as between the close of the eighteenth century and the beginning of the nineteenth. The lesson of things was very hard, the saddest disillusions arose and a radical upheaval followed in the minds of men. Facts, in a word, proved to be contrary to all expectations; and this at first produced a profound discouragement among the disillusioned, which, not- withstanding, gave rise to the desire and the need of new investigations. We know that Saint Simon and Fourier, in whom operated precisely at the be- ginning of the century, in the exclusive forms of the ideas of premature genius, the reaction against the immediate results of the politico-economic revo- lution, arose resolutely, the first against the jurists, and the second against the economists. In fact, when once the obstacles to liberty, which had been characteristic of other times, had been sup- pressed, new obstacles, graver and more painful, had replaced them, and, as equal happiness for all was not realized,/society remained in its political form as it had been before, an organization of inequalities. It must be, then, that society is something autono- 166 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. mous, innate, a complex automaton of relations and conditions, which defies the subjective good in- tentions of each of the members who compose it, and which escapes from the illusions and the de- signs of the idealists. It thus follows a course of its own from which we may infer certain laws of proc- ess and development, but does not suffer us to im- pose laws upon it. By this transformation in the minds of men, the nineteenth century heralded itself as the century of historic science and of sociology. The principle of development has, indeed, since then, invaded all domains of thought. In this cen- tury, the grammar of history has been discovered, and thus the key has been found to explore the genesis of myths. The embryonic traces of pre- history have been sought out, and, for the first time, the processes of political and legal forms have been arranged into a series. The nineteenth century her- alded itself as the century of sociology in the per- son of Saint Simon, in whom, as happens with the self-taught precursors of genius, we find confused together the germs of so many contradictory tenden- cies. In this aspect the materialistic conception is a result ; but it is a result which is the complement of the whole process of formation ; and as a result and a complement it is also the simplification of all his- toric science and of all sociology, because it takes us back from things derived and from complex con- ditions to elemental functions. And that is brought about by the direct suggestion of new dynamic ex- perience. HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 167 The laws of economics, such as they are of them- selves and their own inherent force, have triumphed over all illusions and have shown themselves to be the directing power of social life. The great in-" 7 dustrial revolution which was produced made it clear that social classes, if they are not a fact of na- ture, are still less a consequence of chance and of free will ; they arise historically and socially in a determined form of production. And who, in truth, has not seen the birth under his eyes of new proleta- rians upon the economic ruin of so many classes of small proprietors, small peasants and artisans ; and who has not been in a position to discover the meth- od of this new creation of a new social status, to which so many men were reduced and in which they were necessarily obliged to live. Who has not been in a position to discover that money, transformed into capital, had succeeded, in a few years, in be- coming master by the attraction which it exercises over the labor of free men, in whom the necessity of selling themselves freely as wage workers had been prepared long before by so many ingenious legal processes and by violent or indirect expropriation? And who has not seen the new cities rise around factories and create around their circumference this desolating poverty, which is no longer the effect of individual misfortune, but the condition and the source of wealth? And in this new poverty were numerous women and children, arising for the first time from an unknown existence to take their place on the page of history as a sinister illustration of a 168 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. society of equals. And who did not feel — even if that had not been announced in the so-called doc- trine of the Rev. Malthus— that the number of guests which this mode of economic organization can en- tertain, if it is sometimes insufficient for him who, by reason of the favorable state of production, has need of hands, is often also superabundant, and therefore finds no occupation and becomes a source of danger? It becomes evident, also, that the rapid and violent economic transformation which was ac- complished openly in England had succeeded there, because that country had been able to build up for itself, as compared with the rest of Europe, a mo- nopoly till then unknown, and because to maintain this monopoly an unscrupulous policy had been ren- dered necessary, and that permitted all, for one happy moment, to translate into prose the ideological myth of the state, which was to be the guardian and the preceptor of the people. This immediate perception of these consequences of the new life was the origin of the pessimism, more or less romantic, of the laudatores temporis acti from De Maistre to Carlyle. The satire of liberalism in- vaded minds and literature at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Then begins that criticism of society, which is the first step in all sociology. It was necessary before all else to overthrow the ide- ology, which had accumulated and expressed itself in so many doctrines of the Natural Right or the Social Contract. It was necessary to get into contact with the facts which the rapid events of so HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 169 intensive a processus imposed upon the attention in forms so new and startling. Here appears Owen, incomparable at all points of view, but especially for the clearness which he dis- played in the determination of the causes of the new poverty, even though he was but a child in his quest of the means for overcoming it. It was necessary to arrive at the objective criticism of economics, which appeared for the first time, in one-sided and reac- tionary forms, in Sismondi. In this period where the conditions of a new historic science were rip- ening, arose so many different forms of socialism, Utopian, one-sided or completely extravagant, which never reached the proletarians, either because these had no political consciousness, or if they had any, it manifested itself in sudden starts, as in the French conspiracies and riots from 1830 to 1848, or they kept on the political ground of immediate reforms, as is the case with the Chartists. And nevertheless all this socialism, however Utopian, fantastic and ideological it may have been, was an immediate and often salutary criticism of economics — a one-sided criticism, indeed, which lacked the scientific comple- ment of a general historical conception. All these forms of criticism, partial, one-sided and incomplete had their culmination in scientific social- ism. This is no longer subjective criticism applied to things but the discovery of the self-criticism which is in the things themselves. The real criti- cism of society is society, itself, which, by the anti- thetic conditions of the contrasts upon which it rests, 170 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. engenders from itself, within itself, the contradiction, and finally triumphs over this by its passage into a new form. The solution of the existing antitheses is the proletariat, which the proletarians themselves know or do not know. Even as their misery has be- come the condition of present society, so in their misery is the justification of the new proletarian revolution. It is in this passage from the criticism of subjective thought, which examines things out- side and imagines it can correct them at once, to the understanding of the self-criticism exercised by so- ciety over itself in the immanence of its own pro- cessus — it is in this only that the dialectic of history consists, which Marx and Engels, in so far as they were materialists, drew from the idealism of Hegel. But on the final reckoning it matters little whether the literary men, who knew no other meaning for dialectics than that of an artificial sophistry nor whether the doctors and scholars who are never apt to go beyond the knowledge of particular facts can ever account themselves for these hidden and com- plicated forms of thought. But the great economic transformation, which has furnished the materials composing modern society, in which the empire of capitalism has arrived at the limit of its complete development, would not have been so immediately and so suggestively instructive, if it had not been luminously illustrated by the be- wildering and catastrophic movement of the French Revolution. This put in evidence, like a tragedy on HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 171 the stage, all the antagonistic forces of modern so- ciety, because this society has developed on the ruins of previous forms, and because, in so short a time and with so hasty a march, it has traversed the phases of its birth and its establishment. The revolution ensued from the obstacles which the bourgeoisie had to overcome by violence, since it appeared from evidence that the passage from the old forms to the new forms of production — or of property, if we borrow the language of jurists — could not be realized by the quieter ways of succes- sive and gradual reforms. It brought in its train the upheaval, the friction and the intermingling of all the old classes of the Ancient Regime, and the rapid and bewildering formation at the same time of new classes, in the very rapid but very intensive period of ten years, which, compared with the ordinary his- tory of other times and other countries, seems to us like centuries. This rapid succession of monumental events brought to light the most characteristic mo- ments and aspects of the new or modern society, and that so much the more clearly since the militant bourgeoisie had already created for itself intellectual means and organs which had given it with the theory of its own work the reflex consciousness of its movement. The violent expropriation of the great part of the old property, that is to say, of the property crystal- lized in fiefs, in royal and princely domains and in mortmain, with the real and personal rights derived therefrom, put at the disposal of the state, which 172 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. by the necessity of things had become an exceptional, terrible and all-powerful government, an extraor- dinary mass of economic resources ; thus, there were, on the one side, the singular policy of the assignats which finally annulled themselves, and on the other side, the formation of the new proprietors who owed their fortune to the chances of gambling, to intrigue and to speculation. And who again would have dared thereafter to swear upon the ancient, sacred altar of property, when his recent and authentic title rested in so evident a manner upon the knowledge of fortunate circumstances? If it had ever, passed through the head of so many troublesome philoso- phers, beginning with the Sophists, that law is a cre- ation of man, useful and convenient, this heretical proposition might seem thenceforth a simple and intuitive truth to the meanest of the beggars in Paris. Had not the proletarians with all the com- mon people given the impulse to the revolution in general by the expected movements of April, 1789, and did they not afterwards find themselves, as it were, driven anew from the stage of history after the failure of the revolt of Prairial in 1795? Had they not carried on their shoulders all the ardent de- fenders of liberty and equality ? Had they not held in their hands the Paris Commune, which was, for a time, the impulsive organ of the Assembly and of all France ; had they not finally the bitter disillusion of having created new masters for themselves with their own hands ? The bewildering consciousness of this disillusion constitutes the psychological motive, HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 173 rapid and immediate, of the conspiracy of Babeuf, which, for that very reason, is a great fact in history, and bears in itself all the elements of objective trag- edy. The land which fief and mortmain had, as it were, bound to a body, to a family, to a title, now, deliv- ered from its bonds, had become a commodity, to serve as a basis and instrument for the production of merchandise ; so docile a commodity, that it was put " into circulation in the form of morsels of paper. And around these symbols, multiplied to such a degree over the things that they were to represent that they finished by no longer having any value, Business came forth, a giant, arising, from all sides, on the shoulders of those most wretched in their poverty, and through all the devious ways of politics ; it was especially shameless in its way of taking part in war and its glorious successes. Even the rapid progress of technique, hastened by the urgency of circum- stances, gave material and occasion to the prosperity of business. The laws of bourgeois economics, which are those of individual production in the antagonistic field of competition, revolted furiously, through violence and ruse, against the idealistic efforts of a revolutionary government which, strong in its certainty of sav- ing its country, and stronger still in its illusion of founding for eternity the liberty of equals, believed it was possible to suppress gambling by the guillo- tine, to eliminate Business by closing the Stock Ex- change and to assure existence to the common peo- 174 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. pie by fixing the maximum of prices for objects of prime necessity. Commodities, prices and Business reasserted with violence their own liberty against those who wished to preach to them and impose ethics upon them. Thermidor, whatever may have been the original intentions of the Thermidorians, whether vile, cow- ardly, or misguided, was, in its hidden causes as in its apparent effects, the triumph of Business over democratic idealism. The constitution of 1793, which marks the extreme limit that can be reached by the democratic ideal, was never put into practice. The grave pressure of circumstances, the menace of the foreigner, the different forms of internal rebel- lion, from the Girondists to the Vendee, rendered necessary an exceptional government, which was the Terror, born of fear. In proportion as dangers ceased, the need of the terror ceased. But the dem- ocracy shattered itself against the Business which was bringing into existence the property of new proprietors. The constitution of the year III. con- secrated the principle of moderate liberalism, whence proceeds all the constitutionalism of the European continent ; but it was, before all else, the road lead- ing to the guaranty of property. To change the proprietors while preserving property, — that is the banner, the watchword, the ensign which defied through the years from Aug. 10, 1792, the violent tumults as well as the bold designs of those who at- tempted to found society upon virtue, equality and Spartan abnegation. But the Directory was the HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 175 footpath by which the revolution arrived at the downfall of itself as an idealistic effort; and with the Directory, which was open and professed cor- ruption, this banner became a reality ; the proprietors are changed, but property is saved. And, indeed, to raise upon so many ruins a stable edifice, there was need of real force; and this was found in that strange adventurer of incomparable genius, upon whom fortune had imperially smiled, and he was the only one who possessed the virtue of putting an end to this gigantic fable, because there was in him neither shadow nor trace of moral scruples. In this furor of events strange things happened. The citizens armed for the defense of their country, victorious beyond its frontiers over surrounding Eu- rope, into which with their conquest they carried the revolution, transformed themselves into a soldiery to oppress the liberty of their country. The peasants who, at a moment of imperious suggestion, produced over the feudal estates the anarchy of 1789, now having become soldiers, or small proprietors, or small farmers, and having remained for a moment the advance sentinels of the revolution, fell back into the silent and stolid calm of their traditional life, which, without risks and without movements, served as a sure basis for the so-called social order. The petty bourgeois of the cities, and the former mem- bers of the guilds rapidly developed, in the camp of economic struggle, into free traffickers in manual labor. The freedom of trade required that every product become easily merchantable, and thus it 176 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. triumphed over the last obstacle, by enforcing the demand that labor also become for it a free com- modity. All changed at this moment. The state, which for centuries so many million deluded ones had re- garded as a sacred institution or a divine mandate, allowed its sovereign to be beheaded by the prosaic means of a technical machine, and thereby lost its sacred character. The state, also, was becoming a technical appliance, which substituted bureauocracy for hierarchy. And as the ancient titles no longer assured their possessors the privilege of exercising diverse functions, this new state could become the prey of all those who wished to seize upon it; it found itself, in a word, put up at auction, with the provision that the successful aspirants must be the solid guarantors of the property of the new and the old proprietors. The new state, which had need of its Eighteenth Brumaire to become an orderly bu- reaucracy, supported upon victorious militarism, this state which completed the revolution in the act which denied it, could not dispense with its scripture, and it found it in the Civil Code, which is the golden book for a society which produces and sells com- modities. It is not in vain that generalized juris- prudence had preserved and annotated for centuries, in the form of a scientific discipline, this Roman law, which was, which is and ever shall be, the typical and classical form of the law of every shopkeeping society, until communism puts an end to the possi- bility of buying and selling. HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 177 The bourgeoisie, which, by the concurrence of so many singular circumstances effected the revolution with the concurrence of so many other classes and semi-classes which after a short lapse of time al- most all disappeared from the political stage, seemed, in the moments of the most violent shocks, as if moved by motives inspired by an ideology, which would have absolutely no relation with the effects which actually supervene and perpetuated them- selves. The meaning of that is that in the heat of struggle the bewildering change of the economic sub- structure appeared, as if it were, disguised by ideals and obscure by the interlacings of so many inten- tions and designs, whence sprung so many acts of cruelty and of unparalleled heroism, so many cur- rents of illusion and hard facts of disenchantment. Never had so powerful a faith in the ideal of prog- ress sprung from human breasts. To deliver the human race from superstitution, and even from re- ligion, to make of each individual a citizen, or of every private man a public man ; those are its be- ginnings : — and then on the line of this programme to sum up, in the short activity of a few years, an evolution which appears to the most idealistic of to- day as the work of several centuries to come — that is the idealism of that time ! And why should it re- volt at the pedagogy of the guillotine? That poetry, grand certainly, if not joyous, left behind it a prose that was severe enough. And it was the prose of the proprietors who owned their property to chance, it was that of the high 178 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. finance and the newly rich purveyors, mar- shals, prefects, journalists and mercenary men of letters; it was the prose of the court of that strange man to whom the qualities of mili- tary genious grafted upon the soul of a brigand, had, without any doubt, conferred the right of treating as an ideologist whoever did not admire the bare fact which, in life, as it was with him, can be noth- ing else than the simple brutality of success. The French Revolution hastened the course of history in a large part of Europe. To it attaches, on the Continent, all that we call liberalism and modern democracy, except in the case of the false imitation of England, and up to the establishment of Italian unity, which was and will remain perhaps the last act of the revolutionary bourgeoisie. This revolu- tion was the most vivid and most instructive exam- ple of the fashion in which a society transforms it- self and how new economic conditions develop, and in developing co-ordinate the members of society into groups and classes. It was the palpable proof of the fashion in which law is found, when it is necessary for the expression and the defense of definite rela- tions, and how the state is created, and how disposal is made of its means, its forces and its organs. Here is seen how ideas arise from the fields of social in- stitutions, and how characters, tendencies, senti- ments, volitions, that is to say, in a word, moral forces, are produced and develop into conditions governed by circumstances. In a word, the data of social science were, so to speak, prepared by society HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 179 itself, and it is no wonder if the revolution, which was preceded ideologically by the most acute form of rationalistic doctrinairism ever known, ended finally by leaving behind it the intellectual need of an anti- doctrinaire historical and sociological science, like that which our own "century has attempted to con- struct. And here, both by what we have seen and by what is known generally, it is useless to recall anew, how Owen forms one of the same group with Saint Simon and Fourier, and to repeat through what ways scientific socialism took its birth. The important thing is in these two points ; that historical material- ism could not arise but from the theoretical con- sciousness of socialism; and that it can henceforth explain its own origin with its own principles, which is the greatest proof of its maturity. Thus I have justified the phrase at the beginning of this chapter : ideas do not descend from heaven. VIII. The road traversed thus far has enabled us to take exact account of the precise and relative value of the so-called doctrine of factors; we know also how its adherents come to eliminate objectively those provisional concepts, which were and are a simple expression of a thought not fully arrived at maturity. And, nevertheless, it is necessary that we speak further of this doctrine, in order to explain better 180 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. and more in detail for what reasons two of the so-' called factors, the state and the law, have been and are still considered as the principal and exclusive subject of history. Historians have indeed for centuries placed in these forms of social life the essence of development. Moreover, they have perceived this development only in the modification of these forms. History has for centuries been treated as a discipline relative to the juridico-political movement and even to the political movement principally. The substitution of society for politics is a recent thing, and much more recent still is the reduction of society to the elements of his- torical materialism. In other words, sociology is of quite recent invention, and the reader, I hope, will have understood for himself that I employ this term for the sake of brevity, to indicate in a general man- ner the science of social functions and variations, and that I do not hold to the specific sense given it by the Positivists. It is more satisfactory to say that, up to the be- ginning of this century, the data bearing upon us- ages, customs, beliefs, etc., or even upon the natural conditions, which serve as the foundation and con- nection for social forms, were not mentioned in political histories unless as objects of simple cu- riosity, or as accessories and complements of the narration. All this cannot be a simple accident, and indeed is not. There is, then, a double interest in taking ac- count of the tardy appearance of social history, both HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 181 because our doctrine justifies yet again by this means its reason for existence, and because we thus elimin- ate, in a definite manner, the so-called factors. If we make an exception of certain critical mo- ments in which social classes, by an extreme in- capacity for adapting themselves to a condition of relative equilibrium, enter into a crisis of more or less prolonged anarchy, and if we make an excep- tion of those catastrophes in which an entire world disappears, as at the fall of the Roman Empire of the West, or at the dissolution of the Califate, then it may be said that, ever since there has been a written history, the state appears not only as the creation of society but also as its support. The first step that child-like thought had made in this order of considerations is in this statement: That which governs is also that which creates. If, moreover, we make an exception of certain short periods of democracy exercised with the vivid consciousness of popular sovereignty, as was the case in a few Greek cities, especially at Athens, and in a few Italian cities, and especially Florence (the for- mer nevertheless were composed of free men who were proprietors of slaves, and the latter of privileged citizens who exploited foreigners and peasants) the society organized into a state was always composed of a majority at the mercy of the minority. And thus the majority of men has appeared in history as a mass sustained, governed, guided, exploited and ill treated, or at least as a variegated conglomera- tion of interests, which a few had to govern, main- 182 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. taining in equilibrium the divergences, either by pressure or by compensation. Thence the necessity of an art of government, and as it is this before all else which strikes those who are studying collective life, it was natural that poli- tics should appear as the author of the social order and as the sign of the continuity in the succession of historic forms. To say politics is to say activity, which, up to a certain point, is exercised in a de- sired direction, until the moment at least when cal- culations dash themselves against unknown or un- expected obstacles. By taking the state as an imper- fect experience would suggest for the author of so- ciety, and politics for the author of the social order, it resulted that the narrators or philosophical histo- rians were driven to place the essence of history in a succession of forms, institutions and political ideas. Whence the state drew its origin, where the basis of its performance was found, that mattered not, as that matters not in current reasoning. The problems of the genetic order arose, as is known, rather late. The state is and it finds its reason for existence in its present necessity; that is so true that the imagina- tion has not been able to adapt itself to the idea that it has not always existed, and so it has prolonged its conjectural existence back to the first origins of the human race. The gods or demigods and heroes were its founders, in mythology at least, just as in mediaeval theology the Pope is the first and therefore the divine and perpetual source of all authority. Even in our time, inexperienced travelers and imbecile missionaries find the state where there is, as among HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 183 savages and barbarians, nothing but the gens, or the tribe of gentes, or the alliance of gentes. Two things were necessary that these prejudices of the judgment should be overcome. In the first place, it was necessary to recognize that the functions of the state arise, increase, diminish, alter and follow each other with the variations of certain social con- ditions. In the second place, it was necessary to ar- rive at a comprehension of the fact that the state exists and maintains itself in that it is organized for the defense of certain definite interests, of one part of society against all the rest of society itself, which must be made in such a way, in its entirety, that the resistance of the subjects, of the ill treated and the exploited, either is lost in multiple frictions, or is tempered by the partial advantages, wretched though they be, to the oppressed themselves. Politics, that art so miraculous and so admired, thus brings us back to a very simple formula; to apply a force or a system of forces to the total of resistances. The first step, and the most difficult, is taken when the state has been reduced to the social conditions whence it draws its origin. But these social condi- tions themselves have been subsequently defined by the theory of classes, the genesis of which is in the manner of the different occupations, granted the distribution of labor, that is to say, granted the rela- tions which co-ordinate and bind men together in a definite form of production. Thenceforth the concept of the state has ceased to represent the direct cause of the historic move- ment as the presumed author of society, because it 184 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. has been seen that in each of its forms and its varia- tions there is nothing else than the positive and forced organization of a definite class rule, or of a definite compact between different classes. And then by an ulterior consequence from these premises, it is finally to be recognized that politics, as the art of acting in a desired direction, is a comparatively small part of the general movement of history, and that it is but a feeble part of the formation and the development of the state itself, in which many things, that is to say, many relations, arise and de- velop by a necessary compact, by a tacit consent, or by violence endured and tolerated. The reign of the unconscious, if by that we mean what is not de- creed by free choice and forethought, but what is de- termined and accomplished by a succession of habits, customs, compacts, etc., has become very consider- able in the domain of the data which form the object of the historic sciences ; and politics, which has been taken as an explanation, has itself become something to explain. We know now in a positive way the reasons in consequence of which history had necessarily to ap- pear under a purely political form. But this does not mean that we ought to believe that the state is a simple excrescence, a mere acces- sory of the social body, or of free association, as so many Utopians and so many ultra-liberal thinkers of anarchist tendencies have imagined. If society has thus far culminated in the state, it is because it has had need of this complement of force and au- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 185 thority, because it is at first composed of units which are unequal by reason of economic differentiations. The state is something very real, a system of forces which maintain equilibrium and impose it through violence and repression. And to exist as a system of forces it has been compelled to develop and to establish an economic power, whether this latter rests upon robbery, the result of war, or whether it consists in direct property in the domain, or whether it is constituted little by little, thanks to the modern method of public taxes, which takes on the consti- tutional appearance of a self-imposed system of tax- ' ation. It is in this economic power, so considerable in modern times, that its capacity for acting is found- ed. It results, that by reason of a new division of labor, the functions of state give rise to special orders and conditions, that is to say, to very particular classes, without including the class of parasites. The state, which is and which must be an economic power that in its defense of the ruling classes it may be furnished with means to repress, to govern, to administer and to make war, creates in a direct or an indirect manner an aggregation of new and particu- lar interests, which necessarily react upon society. Thus the state, by the fact that it has arisen and that it maintains itself as a guaranty of the social anti- theses, which are a consequence of economic differ- entiations, creates around itself a circle of persons interested directly in its existence. Two consequences follow therefrom. As society is not a homogeneous whole, but a body of specialized 186 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. articulations, or, rather, a multiform complexus. of objects and interests, it happens that sometimes the directors of the state seek to isolate themselves, and by this isolation they oppose themselves to the whole of society, and then, in the second place, it happens that organs and functions, created first for the ad- vantage of all, end by no longer serving any inter- est but those of groups, and permit abuses of power on the part of coteries and camorras. Thence arise aristocracies and hierarchies born from the use of the public power, thence arise dynasties ; in the light of simple logic these formations appear wholly ir- rational. From the first beginnings of written history the state has increased or diminished its powers, but it has never disappeared, because ever since there have been, in the society of men unequal in consequence of economic differentiation, reasons for maintaining and for defending, through force or conquest, sla- very, monopolies, or the predominance of one form of production, with the domination of man over man. The state has become, as it were, the field of an endless civil war, which is develop- ing always, even if it does not always show itself under the startling form of Marius and Sylla, days of June and wars of Secession. Within the state, the corruption of man by man has always flourished, because, if there is no form of domination which does not meet resistance, there are no forms of resistance which, in consequence of the pressing needs of life, may not degenerate into a passive compact. HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 187 For these reasons, historic events, seen on the surface of the ordinary monotonous narrative, ap- pear like the repetition of the same type, with few variations, like a series of kaleidoscopic pictures. We need not be astonished if the idealistic Herbart and the caustic or pessimistic Schopenhauer arrived at this conclusion, that there is no history, in the sense of any actual processus, which is to say in common language ; history is a tiresome song. When political history is once reduced to its quint- essence, the state remains illuminated in all its prose. Thenceforth there is no more trace either of theo- logical divination, nor of metaphysical transubstan- tiation, so much in vogue among certain German philosophers, — for whom the state is the Idea, the State Idea which is realized in history, the state is the full realization of the personality, and other stu- pidities of the same sort. The state is a real organi- zation of defense to guarantee and perpetuate a mode of association, the foundation of which is a form of economic production, or a compact and a transaction between forms. To sum up, the state assumes either a system of property, or a compact between several systems of property. There is the founda- tion of all its art, the exercise of which demands that the state itself became an economic power, and that it also dispose of means and processes to make property pass from the hands of some into the hands of others. When, by the effect of an acute and vio : lent change of the forms of production, it is neces- sary to resort to an unusual and extraordinary read- 188 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. justment of the relations of property (for example, the abolition of mortmain and fiefs, the abolition of commercial monopolies), then the old political form is insufficient and revolution is necessary to create a new organ which may operate the new economic transformation. If we make an exception of the very ancient times which are unknown to us, all history is developed in the contacts and the antagonisms of the different tribes and communities, and thereafter of the different nations and different states ; that is to say, that the reasons for the internal antitheses in the circle of each society are always more and more complicated with frictions with the outside world. These two reasons for antagonism condition each other reciprocally, but in ways which are always varying. Often it is internal disturbance which urges a community or a city to enter into external collisions ; at other times it is these collisions which alter the internal relations. The principal motive for the different relations between the different communities has been from the beginnings, even as it is to-day, commerce in the broad sense of the word, that is to say, exchange, whether it is a matter of giving up, as in the poor tribes, merely the surplus in exchange for other things, or whether it is a matter, as to-day, of pro- duction on a large scale, which is carried on with the exclusive intention of selling so as to draw from a sum of money a larger sum of money. This enor- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 189 mous mass of events exterior and interior, which ac- cumulate and pile upon each other in history, is such a trouble to the historians who content themselves with exploring it and summarizing it, that they be- come lost in the infinite attempts at chronological groups and bird's-eye views. Whoever, on the con- trary, knows the internal development of the differ- ent social types in their economic structure, and who considers political events as the particular re- sults of the forces acting in society, ends by triumph- ing over the confusion born out of the multiplicity and the uncertainty of first impressions, and instead of a chronological or synchronous series, or a view of the whole, he can arrive at the concrete series of a real processus. In the presence of these realistic conditions all the ideologies founded on the ethical mission of the state or on any such conception, fall to the ground. The state is, so to speak, fitted into its place, and it re- mains encased, as it were, in the surroundings of the social development, in its capacity of a form result- ing from other conditions, and in its turn, by reason of its existence, reacting naturally upon the rest. Here arises another question. Will this form ever be outgrown ? — or can there be" a society without a state ? — or can there be a society without classes? — and if we must be more explicit, will there ever be a form of communist production with a distribution of labor and of tasks such that there will be no room in it for the development of 190 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. inequalities, that source of domination of man over man ? It is in the affirmative answer to this question that scientific socialism consists, in so far as it af- firms the coming of communistic production, not as a postulate, nor as the aim of a free volition, but as the result of the processus immanent in history. As is well known, the premise of this prevision is in the actual conditions of present capitalist produc- tion. This, socializing continually the mode of pro- duction, has subjected living labor more and more with its regulations to the objective conditions of the technical process, it has day after day concentrated the property in the means of production more and ever more into the hands of a few, who as stock- holders, or speculators, are always found to be more and more removed from immediate labor, the direc- tion of which passes over to intelligence and science. With the increased consciousness of this situation among the proletarians, whose instruction in solida- rity comes from the actual conditions of their em- ployment, and with the decrease of the capacity of the holders of capital to preserve the private direc- tion of productive labor, a moment will come, when in one fashion or another, with the elimination in every form of private rent, interest, profit, the pro- duction will pass over to the collectivist association, that is to say, will become communistic. Thus will disappear all inequalities, except those of sex, age, temperament and capacity, that is to say, all those inequalities will cease which engender economic HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 191 classes, or which are engendered by them, and the disappearance of classes will put an end to the pos- sibility of the state, as domination of man over man. The technical and pedagogical government of intelli- gence will form the only organization of society. In this fashion, scientific socialism, in an ideal fashion at least, has triumphed over the state; and its triumph has given it a complete knowledge both of its mode of origin and the reasons for its natural disappearance. It has understood it precisely because it does not rise up against it in a one-sided and sub- jective fashion, as did more than once, at different epochs, the cynics, the stoics, the epicureans of all sorts, the religious sectaries, the visionary monks, the Utopians and finally, in our days, the anarchists of every stripe. Still more, instead of rising up against it, scientific socialism is proposing to show how the state continually rises up of itself against itself, by creating in the means with which it can- not dispense, as, for example, a colossal system of taxation, militarism, universal suffrage, the devel- opment of education, etc., the conditions of its own ruin. The society which has produced it will re- absorb it ; that is to say, that just as society in or- ganizing a new form of production will eliminate the antagonisms between capital and labor, so, with the disappearance of proletarians and the conditions which render proletarians possible, will disappear all dependence of men upon his fellow man in any form of hierarchy, whatever it may be. The terms in which the genesis and the develop- 192 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. ment of the state evolve, from its initial point of ap- pearance in a particular community, where economic differentiation is beginning, up to the moment where this disappearance begins to foreshadow itself, make it henceforth intelligible to us. The State has been reduced till it is but a neces- sary complement of certain definite economic forms, and thus the theory which would have seen in it an independent factor in history is thenceforth forever eliminated. It is henceforth relatively easy to take account of the fashion in which law has been raised up to the rank of a decisive factor of society, and thus of history, directly or indirectly. Before all else, we must remember in what fashion arose this philosophic conception of justice generalized, which is the principal foundation of the theory which maintains that history is dominated by the progress of independent legislation. With the precocious dissolution of the feudal so- ciety in certain parts of Central and Northern Italy, and with the birth of the Communes, which were republics of production grouped in trade guilds and merchant guilds, the Roman law was forced into a place of honor. This law flowered anew in the Universities. It entered into a struggle with the barbaric laws and also in part with the canon law ; it was then evidently a form of thought HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 193 which answered better to the needs of the bour- geoisie, which was beginning to develop. In fact, considering the peculiarities of rival laws, which were either customs of barbarous nations, or corporation privileges, or papal or imperial conces- sions, this law appeared as the universality of writ- ten reason. Had it not arrived at the point of re- garding human personality in its most abstract and human relations, since a certain Titius is capable of becoming debtor and creditor, of selling and buying, of making a cession, a donation, etc. ? Roman law, although elaborated in its last editing at the com- mand of emperors by servile parasites, appeared then, amid the decline of mediaeval institutions, as a revolutionary force, and as such it constituted a great step of progress. This law, so universal that it gave the means of overthrowing barbaric laws, was certainly a law which corresponded to human nature considered under its generic relations; and by its opposition to private laws and privileges it appeared as a natural law. We know, moreover, how this ideology of natural law arose. It acquired its greatest distinction in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries ; but it had long been prepared for by the jurisprudence which took for its base the Roman law, whether it adopted it, revised it, or corrected it. To the formation of the ideology of natural law another element contributed, the Greek philosophy of later epochs. The Greeks, who were the inventors of those definite arts of the mind which are sciences, 194 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. never, as is known, drew from their multiple local laws a discipline corresponding to that which we call the science of law. On the contrary, by the rapid progress of abstract research in the circle of their democracies, they arrived very soon at a logical, rhetorical and pedagogical discussion on the nature of justice, the state, the law, penalty; and in their philosophy we may trace the rudimentary forms of all later discussions. But it is not until later, that is to say, in the Hellenistic epoch, when the limits of Greek life were sufficiently enlarged to be mingled with those of the civilized world, that, in the cos- mopolitan environment which carried with it the need of searching in each man for the generic man, the rationalism of justice arose — of justice or of na- tural right in the form given it by the stoic philo- sophy. The Greek rationalism which had already fur- nished a certain formal element to the logical codifi- cation of Roman law reappeared in the eighteenth century in the doctrine of natural right. That ideology, whose criticism has served as an arm and an instrument for giving a juridical form to the economic organization of modern society, has had, consequently, various sources. Yet, in fact, this juridical ideology reflects, in the struggle for law and against law, the revolutionary period of the bourgeois spirit. And, although it takes its doc- trinal point of departure in a return to the traditions -of the ancient philosophy, in the generalization of Roman jurisprudence, in everything else, and in all its development, it is completely new and modern. HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 195 Roman law, although it was generalized by scholas- ticism and by modern elaboration, still remains with- in itself a collection of special cases which have not been deduced according to a preconceived system, nor preordained by the systematic mind of the legis- lator. On the other hand, the rationalism of the stoics, their contemporaries and their disciples, was a work of pure contemplation, and it produced no revolutionary movement around it. The ideology of natural law, which finally took the name of philos- ophy of law, was, on the contrary, systematic, it started always from general formulae, it was ag- gressive and polemic, and still more, it was at war with orthodoxy, with intolerance, with privilege, with constituted bodies ; in fine, it fought for the lib- erties which to-day constitute the formal conditions of modern society. It is with this ideology, which was a method of struggle, that arose for the first time, in a typical and decisive form, that idea that there is a law which is one and the same with reason. The laws against which the struggle was carried on appear as deviations, backward steps, errors. From this faith in rational law arose the blind be- lief in the power of the legislator, which grew into fanaticism at the critical moments of the French Revolution. Thence the belief that society as a whole is to be submitted to one single law, equal for all, systematic, logical, consistent. Thence the conviction that a law guaranteeing to all a legal equality, that is to say, 196 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. the privilege of contracting, guaranteed also liberty to all. The triumph of true law assures the triumph of reason, and the society which is regulated by a law equal for all is a perfect society ! It is useless to say that there were illusions at the bottom of these tendencies. We all know to what this universal liberation of men was to lead. But what is most important here is the fact that these persuasions arose from a conception of law, which considered it as detached from the social causes which produced it. Likewise that reason, to which these ideologies appealed, reduced itself to relieving labor, association, traffic, commerce, political forms and conscience from all limits and all obstacles which prevented free competition. I have already shown in another chapter how the great Revolution of the eighteenth century may serve us for experience. And if there is still some one to-day who insists on speaking of a rational law which dominates history, of a law, in short, which would be a factor, instead of being a simple fact in historic revolution, that means that he is living out of our time and that he has not understood that our liberal and equalitarian codification has already, in fact, marked the end and the term of that whole school of natural law. By different ways we have arrived in this century at reducing law, considered previously as a rational thing, into a material thing, and thus into a thing corresponding to definite social conditions. In the first place, the interest in history gained in HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 197 extent and in depth, and it led studencs to recognize that to understand the origins of law, it was not sufficient to stop at the data of pure reason, nor at the study of Roman law alone. Barbaric laws, the usages and customs of nations and societies, so despised by the rationalists, have been theoretically restored to honor. That was the only way to arrive, through the study of the most ancient forms, at an understanding of how the most recent forms could have been successively produced. Codified Roman law is a very modern form ; that personality, which it assumes as a universal sub- ject, is an elaboration of a very advanced epoch, in which the cosmopolitanism of social relations was dominated by a military-bureaucratic constitution. In this environment, in which a written code of reason had been built up, there was no longer any trace of spontaneity or popular life, there was no more democracy. This same law, before arriving at this crystallization, had arisen and had developed; and if we study it in its origins and in its develop- ments, and especially if, in this study, we employ the comparative method, we recognize that, upon many points, it is analogous to the institutions of inferior societies and nations. It therefore becomes evident that the true science of law can be nothing less than the genetic history of the law itself. But, while the European continent had created in the codification of civil law the type and the text- book of practical bourgeois judgment, was there not in England another self-originating form of law, 198 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. which arose and developed in a purely practical man- ner, from the very conditions of the society which produced it without system, and without the action of methodical rationalism having any part in it? The law, which actually exists and is applied, is therefore a much simpler and much more modest thing than was imagined by the enthusiasts who sing the praises of written judgment, of the empire of reason. For their defense, it must not be forgotten that they were the ideal precursors of the great Revolution. For ideology it was necessary to sub- stitute the history of legal institutions. The phil- osophy of law ended with Hegel; and if objectors mention the books published since, I reply that the works published by professors are not always the index of the progress of thought. The philosophy of law thus became the philosophical study of the history of law. And it is not necessary to repeat here again how historic philosophy ended in economic materialism and in what sense critical communism is the reversal of Hegel. This revolution, apparently a revolution in ideas alone, is merely an intellectual reflection of the revo- lutions which have been produced in practical life. In our century, legislating has become an epi- demic ; and reason enthroned in legal ideology has been dethroned by parliaments. In these the an- titheses of class interests have taken on the form of parties ; and the parties struggle for or against defi- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 199 nite laws; and all law appears as a simple fact, or as a thing which it is useful or not useful to do. The proletariat has arisen; and wherever the struggle of the laborers has taken definite form, the bourgeois codes have been convicted of falsehood. Written judgment has shown itself powerless to save the wage-workers from the oscillations of the market, to guarantee women and children against the oppressive hours of the factories, or to find an expedient to solve the problem of forced idleness. The partial limitation of the hours of labor has, itself alone, been the subject and the occasion of a gigantic struggle. The small and the large bour- geoisie, agrarians and manufacturers, advocates of the poor and defenders of accumulated wealth, monarchists and democrats, socialists and reaction- aries, have bitterly contended over extracting profit from the action of the public authorities and over exploiting the contingencies of politics and parlia- mentary intrigue, to find the guaranty and the de- fense of certain definite interests in the interpreta- tion of existing law, or in the creation of a new law. This new legislation has more than once been re- vised, and the strangest oscillations may be observed in it; extending from the humanitarianism which defends the poor and even animals, to the promulga- tion of martial law. Justice has been stripped of its mask and has become merely a profane thing. The consciousness of experience has come to us and has given us a formula as precise as it is mod- est ; every rule of law has been and is the customary, 200 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. authoritative, or judicial defense of a definite in- terest; the reduction of law to economics is then almost immediately accomplished. If the materialistic conception finally came to fur- nish to these tendencies an explicit and systematic view, it is because its orientation has been deter- mined by the visual angle of the proletariat. This last is the necessary product and the indispensable condition of a society in which all the persons are, from an abstract point of view, equal before the law, but where the material conditions of development and the liberties of each are unequal. The pro- letarians are the forces through which the accumu- lated means of production reproduce themselves and reconstitute themselves into new wealth; but they themselves live only by enrolling themselves under the authority of capital; and from one day to the next they find themselves out of work, impoverished and exiles. They are the army of social labor, but their chiefs are their masters. They are the nega- tion of justice in the empire of law, that is to say, that they are the irrational element in the pretended domain of reason. History then has not been a processus for arriving at the empire of reason in law ; it has thus far been nothing else than a series of changes in the form of subjection and servitude. History then consists en- tirely in the struggle of interests, and law is but the authoritative expression of the interests which have triumphed. These formulae indeed do not permit us to ex- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 201 plain, by the immediate examination of the various interests which are at its base, every particular law which has appeared in history. The facts of history are very complicated; but these general formulae suffice to indicate the style and the method of re- search which has been substituted for legal ideology. IX. Here I must give certain formulae. Granted the conditions of the development of labor and the instruments appropriated to it, the economic structure of society, that is to say, the form of production of the immediate means of life, determines, on an artificial field, in the first place and directly, all the rest of the practical activity of those associated, and the variation of this activity in the processus which we call history, that is to say : — the formation, the frictions, the struggles and the erosions of the classes ; — the corresponding regula- tions relative to law and morality; — and the rea- sons and modes of subordination and subjection of men toward men and the corresponding exercise of dominion and authority, in fine, that which gives birth to the State and that which constitutes it. It determines, in the second place, the tendency and in great part, in an indirect fashion, the objects of imagination and of thought in the production of art, religion and science. The products of the first and of the second stage, in consequence of the interests which they create, 202 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. the habits which they engender, the persons whom they group and whose spirit and inclinations they specify, tend to fix themselves and isolate them- selves as independent entities; and thence comes that empirical view, according to which different independent factors, having an efficacy and a rhythmic movement of their own, contribute to form the historic processus and the social configurations which successively result from it. It is the social classes, in so far as they consist in differentiations of interests, which unfold in definite ways and in forms of opposition ( — whence come the friction, the movement, the process and the progress — ), which have been the factors — if it was ever neces- sary to employ this expression — the real, proper and positive factors of history, from the disappearance of primitive communism until to-day. The variations of the underlying (economic) structure of society which, at first sight, show them- selves intuitively in the agitation of the passions, develop consciously in the struggles against law and for law, and become realized in the shaking and in the ruin of a definite political organ- ization, have in reality their adequate expression only in the change in the relations which exist be- tween the different social classes. And these rela- tions change with the change of the relations which previously existed between the productivity of labor and the (legal-political) conditions of co-ordination of those who co-operate in production. And finally, these connections between the pro- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 203 ductivity of labor and the co-ordination of those who co-operate in it are changed with the changing of the instruments — in the broad sense of the word — necessary to production. The processus and the progress of technique, as they are the index, are also the condition of all the other processus and of all progress. Society is for us a fact, which we cannot solve, unless it be by that analysis which reduces the com- plex forms to the simpler forms, the modern forms to the older forms : but that is to remain always, nevertheless, in a society which exists. History is but the history of society — that is to say, the his- tory of the variations of human co-operation, from the primitive horde down to the modern State, from the immediate struggle against nature, by the means of a few very simple tools, down to the present economic structure, which reduces itself to these two poles; accumulated labor (capital) and living labor (proletarians). To resolve the social com- plexus into simple individuals, and to reconstruct it afterwards by the acts of free and voluntary thought; to construct, in fine, society with its rea- sons, is to misunderstand the objective nature and the immanence of the historic processus. Revolutions, in the broadest sense of the word, and in the specific sense of the destruction of a political organization, mark the real and proper dates of historic epochs. Seen from afar, in their elements, in their preparation and their effects, at long range, they may appear to us as moments of 204 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. a constant evolution, with minute variations ; but considered in themselves, they are definite and pre- cise catastrophes, and it is only as catastrophes that they are historic events. X. Ethics, art, religion, science, are they then but products of economic conditions? — expositions of the categories of these very conditions? — effluvia, ornaments, emanations and mirages of material in- terests ? Affirmations of this sort, announced with this nudity and crudity, have already for some time passed from mouth to mouth, and they are a con- venient assistance to the adversaries of materialism, who use them as a bugbear. The slothful, whose number is great even among the intellectuals,- will- ingly fit themselves to this clumsy acceptance of such declarations. What a delight for all careless persons to possess, once for all, summed up in a few propositions, the whole of knowledge, and to be able with one single key to penetrate all the secrets of life! All the problems of ethics, aesthetics, philology, critical history and philosophy reduced to one single problem and freed thus from all diffi- culties ! In this way the simpletons might reduce the whole of history to commercial arithmetic; and finally a new and authentic interpretation of Dante might give us the Divine Comedy illustrated with the HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 205 process of manufacturing pieces of cloth which the wily Florentine merchants sold for their greater profit ! The truth is that the declarations which involve problems are converted very easily into vulgar paradoxes in the heads of those who are not accus- tomed to triumph over the difficulties of thought by the methodical use of appropriate means. I shall speak here, in general terms, of these problems, but, as it were, by aphorisms ; and certainly I do not pro- pose to write an encyclopedia in this short essay. And first of all, ethics. I do not mean systems and catechisms, religious or philosophic. Both of these have been and are above the ordinary and profane course of human events in most cases, as Utopias are above things. Neither do I speak of those formal analyses of eth- ical relations, which have been elaborated from the Sophists down to Herbart. This is science and not life. And it is formal science, like logic, geometry and grammar. The one who latest and with so much profundity defined these ethical relations (Herbart), knew well that ideas, that is to say, the formal points of view of the moral judgment, are in themselves powerless. Therefore he put into the circumstances of life and into the pedagogic forma- tion of character the reality of ethics. He might have been taken for Owen if he had not been a retrograde. I am speaking of that ethics which exists pro- 206 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. saically and in an empirical and current fashion, in the inclinations, the habits, the customs, the coun- sels, the judgments and the appreciations of ordin- ary mortals. I am speaking of that ethics which as suggestion, as impulse and as bridle, appears in different degrees of development, and more or less unmistakably, although in a fragmentary fashion, among all men; by the very fact of association be- cause each occupies a definite position in the asso- ciation, they naturally and necessarily reflect upon their own works and the works of others, and they conceive obligations and appreciations and all the first elements of general precepts. There is the factum; and what is most important is that this factum appears to us varied and multiple in the different conditions of life, and variable through history. This factum is the datum of research. Facts are neither true nor false, as Aris- totle already knew. Systems, on the contrary, the- ologic or rational, may be true or false because they aim to comprehend, explain and complete the fact, by bringing that fact to another fact, or integrating it with another. Some points of preliminary theory are henceforth settled, in all that concerns the interpretation of this factum. The will does not choose of itself, as was sup- posed by the inventors of free will, that product of the impotency of the psychological analysis not yet arrived at maturity. Volitions, in so far as they are facts of consciousness, are particular expres- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 207 sions of the psychic mechanism. They are a result, first of necessities, and then, of all that precedes them up to the very elementary organic impulse. Ethics does not place itself nor does it engender itself. There is no such universal foundation of the ethical relations varied and variable, as that spiritual entity which has been called the moral con- science, one and unique for all men. This abstract entity has been eliminated by criticism like all other such entities, that is to say, like all the faculties of the soul. What a beautiful explanation of the fact, in truth, to assume the generalization of the fact itself as a means of explanation. People reasoned thus: the sensations, the perceptions, the intuitions at a certain moment are found imagined, that is to say, changed in their form, therefore the imagina- tion has transformed them. To this class of inven- tions belongs the moral conscience, which was accepted as a postulate of the ethical estimates, which are always conditioned. The moral con- science which really exists is an empirical fact; it is an index or a summary of the relative ethical formation of each individual. If there can be in it material for science, this cannot explain the ethical relations by means of the conscience, but the very thing it needs is to understand how that conscience is formed. If volitions are derived, and if morality results from the conditions of life, ethics, in its complete- ness, is but a formation; its problem is altogether pedagogic. 208 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. There is a pedagogy which I will call individual- istic and subjective, which, granted the generic con- ditions of human perfectibility, constructs abstract rules by which men, who are still in a period of for- mation, may be led to be strong, courageous, truth- ful, just, benevolent, and so on through the entire extent of the cardinal or secondary virtues. But again, can subjective pedagogy construct of itself a social background upon which all these beautiful things ought to be realized? If it constructs it, it simply elaborates a Utopia. And, in truth, the human race, in the rigid course of its development, never had time nor occasion to go to the school of Plato or of Owen, of Pesta- lozzi or Herbart. It has done as it has been forced to do. Considered in an abstract manner, all men can be educated and all are perfectible ; as a matter of fact, they have always been perfected and in- structed as much as and in the measure that they could, granted the conditions of life in which they were obliged to develop. It- is here precisely that the word environment is not a metaphor, and that the use of the word compact is not metaphorical. Real morality always presents itself as something conditioned and limited, which the imagination has sought to outgrow, by constructing Utopias, and by creating a supernatural pedagogue, or a mirac- ulous redemption. Why should the slave have had the ways of seeing and the passions and the sentiments of the master whom he feared? How could the peasant HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 209 relieve himself of his invincible superstitions, to which he was condemned by his immediate depend- ence upon nature and his mediate dependence upon a social mechanism unknown to him, and by his blind faith in the priest, who stands to him as a magician and sorcerer. In what fashion could the modern proletarian of the great industrial cities, exposed continuously to the alternatives of misery or subjection, how could he realize that way of liv- ing, regulated and monotonous, which was the one suited to the members of the trade guilds, whose existence seemed imbedded in a providential plan? From what intuitive elements of experience could the hog merchant of Chicago, who furnishes Europe with so many products at a cheap rate, ex- tract the conditions of serenity and intellectual ele- vation which gave to the Athenian the qualities of the noble and good man, and to the Roman citizen, the dignity of heroism? What power of docile Christian persuasion will extract from the souls of the modern proletarians their natural reasons of hate against their determined or undetermined oppressors? If they wish that justice be done, they must appeal to violence ; and before the love of one's neighbor as a universal law can appear possible to them, they must imagine a life very different from the present life, which makes a necessity of hatred. In this society of differentiations, hatred, pride, hypocrisy, falsehood, baseness, injustice and all the catechism of the cardinal vices and their 210 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. accessories make a sad appendage to the morality, equal for all, upon which they constitute the satire. Ethics then reduces itself for us to the historical study of the subjective and objective conditions of how morality develops or meets obstacles to its development. In this only, that is to say, within these limits, we can recognize some value in the affirmation that morality corresponds to the social situations, and, in the last analysis, to the economic conditions. Only an idiot could believe that the individual morality of each one is proportionate to his individual economic situation. That is not only empirically false, but intrinsically irrational. Granted the natural elasticity of the psychic mechanism, and also the fact that no one lives so shut up in his own class that he does not undergo the influence of other classes, of the common en- vironment and of the interlacing traditions, it is never possible to reduce the development of each individual to the abstract and generic type of his class and his social status. We are dealing there with the phenomena of the mass, of those phenom- ena which form, or should form, the objects of moral statistics: the discipline which has thus far remained incomplete, because it has taken for the objects of its combinations groups which it creates of itself by the addition of numbers of cases (for example, adulteries, thefts, homicides) and not the groups which, as classes, conditions, or situations exist really, that is to say, socially. To recommend morality to men while assuming HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 211 or ignoring their conditions, this was hitherto the object and the class of argument of all the catechists. To recognize that these are given by the social environment, that is what the communists oppose to the Utopia and the hypocrisy of the preachers of morality. And as they see in morality not a privilege of the elect, nor a gift of nature, but a result of experience and education, they admit human perfectibility through reasons and argu- ments which are, in my opinion, more moral and more ideal than those which have been given by the ideologists. In other words, man develops, or produces him- self, not as an entity generically provided with cer- tain attributes, which repeat themselves, or devel- op themselves, according to a rational rhythm, but he produces and develops himself as at once cause and effect, as author and consequence, of certain definite conditions, in which are engendered also definite currents of ideas, of opinions, of beliefs, of imaginations, of expectations, of maxims. Thence arise ideologies of every sort, as also the generaliza- tion of morality in catechisms, in canons and in sys- tems. We must not be surprised if these ideologies, once arisen, are afterwards cultivated alone by themselves, if they finally appear, as it were, de- tached from the living field whence they took their birth, nor if they hold themselves above man as im- perative rules and models. The priests and the doctrinaires of every sort 212 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. have given themselves for centuries to this labor of abstraction, and have forced themselves to main- tain the resulting illusions. Now that the positive sources of all ideologies have been found in the mechanism of life itself, we must explain real- istically their mode of generation. And as that is true of all ideologies, it is true also and, in particu- lar of those which consist in projecting ethical esti- mates beyond their natural and direct limits, mak- ing of them anticaptions of divine announcements or presuppositions of universal suggestions of con- science. Therein lies the object of the special historic problems. We cannot always find the tie which unites certain ethical ideas to practical definite con- ditions. The concrete social psychology of past times often remains impenetrable to us. Often the commonest things remain for us unintelligible, for example, the animals considered as unclean, or the origin for the repugnance at marriage between persons of remote degrees of relationship. A pru- dent course of study leads us to conclude that the motives of many details will remain always con- cealed. Ignorance, superstition, singular illusions, symbolisms, these with many others are causes of that unconscious element, often found in customs, which now constitutes for us the unknown and the unknowable. The principal cause of all difficulty is precisely in the tardy appearance of what we call reason, so that the traces of the proximate motives of ideas HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 213 have been lost or have remained enveloped in the ideas themselves. On the subject of science we can be much more brief. For a long time history has been made in an art- less fashion. Granted and admitted that the dif- ferent sciences have their statements in manuals and encyclopedias, it seemed sufficient to work out chronologically the appearance of the different formulas, resolving the total of the systematic sum- mary into the elements which have successively served to compose it. The general presupposition was simple enough; underneath this chronology is the rational conception which develops and pro- gresses. This method, if so it could be called, had within itself a certain disadvantage ; it permitted us at best to understand how, one stage of science being grant- ed, another stage of science may be derived from it by reason, but it did not permit us to discern by what condition of facts men were driven to dis- cover science for the first time, that is to say, to re- duce considered experience into a new and definite form. The question was, then, to find why there is an actual history of science, to find the origin of the scientific necessity, and what unites in a genetic fashion that necessity to our necessities in the con- tinuity of the social processus. The great progress of modern technique, which really constitutes the intellectual substance of the 214 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. bourgeois epoch, has worked, among other miracles, this one also, of revealing to us for the first time the practical origin of the scientific attitude. (We can never forget the Florentine Academy, which produced this phrase, when Italy was in the twi- light of its past grandeur and when. modern society was in the dawn of the great industry.) Henceforth we are in a position to take up the guiding thread of what, by abstraction, is called the scientific spirit ; and no one is any longer astonished at finding that everything in scientific discoveries has come about, as was the case in other primitive times, when the clumsy elementary geometry of the Egyptians arose from the necessity of measuring the fields exposed to the annual inundations of the Nile, and when the periodicity of these inundations suggested, in Egypt and in Babylon, the discovery of the rudi- ments of the astronomical movements. It is certainly true that when science is once cre- ated and partially ripened, as had already happened in the Hellenic period, the work of abstraction, of deduction and of combination continues among scientists in such a way that it possibly obliterates the consciousness of the social causes of the first production of science itself. But if we examine in their main features the epochs of the development of science, and if we confront the periods which the ideologists would characterize as periods of progress and of retrogression of intelligence, we perceive clearly the social reason for the impulses, sometimes increasing, sometimes decreasing, toward HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 213 scientific activity. What need had the feudal so- ciety of Western Europe for this ancient science, which the Byzantines preserved, at least materially, while the Arabs, free agriculturists, industrious arti- sans, or skillful merchants, had succeeded in in- creasing it a little. What is the Renaissance, if not the joining of the initiatory movement of the bour- geoisie to the traditions of ancient learning, which had become usable? What is all the accelerated movement of scientific knowledge, since the seven- teenth century, but the series of acts accomplished by intelligence, refined by experienee, to assure hu- man labor, in the forms of an improved technique, the dominion over natural forces and conditions? Thence arises the war against darkness, supersti- tion, the Church, religion; thence arise naturalism, atheism, materialism ; thence the installation of the domain of reason. The bourgeois epoch is the epoch of minds in full play. (Vico.) It is worth remembering that this government of the Di- rectory, which was the prototype and the compen- dium of all liberal corruption, was the first to intro- duce in the University and at the Academy in a formal and solemn fashion the science of free in- quiry with Lamark ! This science, which the bour- geois epoch has, through its inherent conditions, stimulated and made to grow like a giant, is the only heritage of past centuries which communism accepts and adopts without reserve. It would not be useful to stop here for the dis- cussion of the so-called anthithesis between science 216 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. and philosophy. If we accept those fashions of philosophizing which are confounded with mystic- ism and theology, philosophy never means a science or doctrine separate from its appropriate and par- ticular things, but it is simply a degree, a form, a stage of thought with relation to the things which enter into the domain of experience. Philosophy is, then, either a generic anticipation of the problems which science has still to elaborate specifically, or a summary and a conceptual elaboration of the re- sults at which the sciences have already arrived. As for those who, that they may not appear behind the times, talk now of scientific philosophy, if we do not wish to stop over the humorous element that there is in that expression, it will suffice to say that they are simply food's. I said some pages back, in my statement of for- mulas, that the economic structure determines in the second place the direction, and in great part and indirectly, the objects of imagination and of thought in the production of art, of religion and of science. To express this otherwise, or to go fur- ther, would be to put one's self voluntarily on the road toward the absurd. Before all else, in this formula, we are opposing the fantastic opinion, that art, religion and science are subjective developments and historical develop- ments of a pretended artistic, religious or scientific spirit, which would go on manifesting itself suc- cessively through its own rhythm of evolution, fa- HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 217 vored or retarded on this side or that by material conditions. By this formula, it is desired to assert, moreover, the necessary connection, through which every fact of art and of religion is the exponent, sentimental, fantastic and thus derived, of definite social conditions. If I say in the second place, it is to distinguish these products from the facts of le- gal-political order which are a true and proper pro- jection of economic conditions. And if I say in great part and indirectly the objects of these ac- tivities, it is to indicate two things : that in artistic or religious production the mediation from the con- ditions to the products is very complicated, and again that men, while living in society, do not there- by cease to live alone by themselves in nature, and to receive from it occasion and, material for curi- osity and for imagination. After all, this is all reduced to a more general formula; man does not make several histories at the same time, but all these alleged different histo-" ries (art, religion, etc.) make up one alone. And it is not possible to take account of that clearly ex- cept at the characteristic and significant moment of the production of new things, that is to say in the periods which I will call revolutionary. Later, the acceptance of the things that have been produced, and the traditional repetition of a definite type, ob- literated the sense of the origins of things. Try, if you will, to detach the ideology of the fables, which are at the foundation of the Homeric poems, from that moment of historic evolution 218 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. where we find the dawn of Aryan civilization in the basin of the Mediterranean, that is to say, from that phase of the higher barbarism in which arises, in Greece and elsewhere, the epic. Or try to im- agine the birth and the development of Christianity elsewhere than in Roman cosmopolitanism, and otherwise than by the work of those proletarians, those slaves, those unfortunates, those desperate ones, who had need of the redemption of the Apoc- alypse and of the promise of the Kingdom of God. Find, if you will, the ground for supposing that in the beautiful environment of the Renaissance the romanticism should begin to appear, which scarce- ly appeared in the decadent Torquato Tasso; or that one might attribute to Richardson or to Diderot the novels of Balzac, in whom appears, as a con- temporary of the first generation of socialism and sociology, the psychology of classes. Far back, far- ther, farther, at the first origins of the mythical con- ceptions, it is evident that Zeus did not assume the characters of father of gods and men until the power of the patria potestas was already estab- lished, and that series of processus began which culminated in the State. Zeus thus ceases to be what was at first the simple divus (brilliant) or the Thunderer. And it is to be observed that at an opposite point of historic evolution, a great num- ber of thinkers of the past century reduced to a sin- gle abstract God, who is a simple regent of the world, all that variegated image of the unknown and transcendental type, developed in so great a HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 219 wealth of mythological, Christian or pagan crea- tions. Man felt himself more at home in nature, thanks to experience, but felt himself better able to penetrate the gearing of society, the knowledge of which he possessed in part. The miraculous dis- solved in his mind, to the point where materialism and criticism could afterwards eliminate that poor remnant of transcendentalism, without taking up war against the gods. There is certainly a history of ideas ; but this does not consist in the vicious circle of ideas that explain themselves. It lies in rising from things to the idea. There is a problem; still more, there is a multitude of problems, so varied, multiple, multi- form and mingled are the projections which men have made of themselves and of their economic-so- cial conditions, and thus of their hopes and their fears, of their desires and their deceptions, in their artistic and religious concepts. The method is found, but the particular execution is not easy. We must above all guard against the scholastic tempta- tion of arriving by deduction at the products of his- toric activity which are displayed in art and in re- ligion. We must hope that philosophers like Krug, who explained the pen with which he wrote by a process of dialectic deduction, have remained for- ever buried in the notes of Hegel's logic. Here I must state certain difficulties. Before attempting to reduce secondary products (for example, art and religion) to the social condi- 220 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. tions which they idealize, one must first acquire a long experience of specified social psychology, in which the transformation is realized. Therein con- sists the justification of that sum of relations, which is designated in another form of language, under the name of Egyptian world, Greek consciousness, spirit of the Renaissance, dominant ideas, psychol- ogy of nations, of society or of classes. When these relations are established, and men have become ac- customed to certain conceptions and certain modes of belief or of imagination, the ideas transmitted by tradition tend to become crystallized. Thus they ap- pear as a force which resists new formations; and as this resistance shows itself through the spoken word, through writing, through intolerance, through polemics, through persecution, so the struggle be- tween the new and the old social conditions ' takes on the form of a struggle between ideas. In the second place, through the centuries of his- tory properly so-called, and as a consequence of the heredity of the pre-history of savagery and of the conditions of subjection and those of inferiority in which the majority of men were and are placed, re- sulted acquiescence in what is traditional, and the ancient tendencies are perpetuated as obstinate sur- vivals. In the third place, as I have said, men living so- cially, do not cease to live also in nature. They are not, of course, bound to nature as animals are, be- cause they live on an artificial groundwork. Every one understands, moreover, that a house is not a HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 221 cave, that agriculture is not natural pasturage, and that pharmacy is not exorcism. But nature is al- ways the immediate subsoil of the artificial ground- work, and it is the environment which contains us. The industrial arts have put between us social ani- mals, and nature, certain intermediaries which modify, set aside or remove the natural influences ; but it has not for all that destroyed the efficacy of these, and we continually feel their effects. And even as we are born men or women, as we die al- most always in spite of ourselves, and as we are dominated by the instinct of generation, so we also bear in our temperament certain special conditions which education in the broad sense of the word, or social compact, can modify, it is true, within cer- tain limits, but which they can never suppress. These conditions of temperament, repeated in in- finite cases throughout the centuries, constitute what is called the race. For all these reasons, our de- pendence upon nature, although it has diminished since prehistoric times, continues in our social life, just as the food which the sight of nature affords to the curiosity and the imagination continues also in our social life. Now these effects of nature, and the sentiments immediate or mediate which result from it, although they have been perceived, since history began, only on the visual angle which is given us by the conditions of society, never fail to reflect themselves in the products of art and of re- ligion, and that adds to the difficulties of a realistic and complete interpretation of both. 222 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. XL In employing this doctrine as a new principle of research, as a precise means of defining our position, and as a visual angle, will it really be possible finally to arrive at a new narrative history ? It is not pos- sible to make an affirmative answer in general to this generic demand. Because, in fact, if we as- sume that the critical communist, the sociologist of economic materialism, or as he is commonly called, the Marxist, has the necessary critical preparation, the habit of historical study, and also the gift re- quired for an orderly and vivacious narration, there is no reason for affirming that he cannot write his- tory, as heretofore the partisans of all other political schools have written it. We have the example of Marx, and there is an argument from fact which admits of no reply. But he was the first and the principal author of the de- cisive concepts of this doctrine, reducing it at once into an instrument of political orientation, in his character of an incomparable publicist, during the revolutionary period of 1848 to 1850. And then he applied it with the greatest precision in that essay entitled Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, of which it may be said today, at a great distance, and after so many publications, if we except cer- tain infinitesimal details and certain false forecasts, that it would be possible to make neither corrections nor important complements. I will not repeat, since HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 223 I am not writing a bibliography, the list of the dif- ferent writings of Marx or Engels — of which we have so many attempts from the Peasants' War (1850) down to his posthumous writings on The Present Unity of Germany — which are an applica- tion of the doctrine, nor those of their successors and of the popularizers of scientific socialism. Even in the socialist press we may read, from time to time, valuable attempts at explanation of certain political events, in which is found, precisely by rea- son of historic materialism, a clearness of vision which would be sought in vain among the writers and the disputants who have not yet torn away the fantastic veils and ideological envelopes of his- tory. Here is not the place to take up the defense of an abstract thesis, as an advocate would do. It is evi- dent, nevertheless, in all the histories which have been written up to the present time, that there is always at bottom, if not in the explicit intentions of the writers, certainly in their spirit, a tendency, a principle, a general view of life ; and so this doc- trine, which has enabled us to study the social struc- ture in an objective manner, must finally direct with precision the researches of history, and must end in a narrative complete, transparent and integral. Helps are not lacking. Economics, which, as everyone sees it today, had its birth and development as the science of bourgeois production, after being puffed up with the illusion .824 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. of representing the absolute laws of all forms of production, has through the dear school of ex- perience entered since, as everyone -knows, upon a period of self-criticism. Just as this self-criticism gave birth, on one side, to critical communism, so on the other side it has given birth, through the labor of the calmest, the wisest and the most prudent of the academic tradition, to the historical school of economic phenomena. Thanks to this school, and through the effect of the application of the descrip- tive and comparative methods, we are henceforth in possession of a vast sum of knowledge on the different historical forms of economics, from the most complex facts and those best specified through essential differences of types, down to the special domain of a cloister or a trade guild of the Middle Ages. The same thing has taken place with statis- tics, which, by the indefinite combination of its sources, succeeds now in throwing light, with a sufficient approximation, upon the movement of population in past centuries. These studies, certainly, are not made in the in- terest of our doctrine, and oftener than not they are made in a spirit hostile to socialism ; something not observed, we may say in passing, by those fool- ish readers of printed papers who so often confuse economic history, historical economics, and his- torical materialism. But these studies, apart from the materials which they gather, are remarkable in that they witness the progress which is in course of making the internal history which, little by little, is HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 225 taking the place of the external history with which, for centuries, the men of letters and artists were oc- cupied. A good part of these materials that have been gathered must always be submitted to new correc- tions, as for that matter happens in every domain of empirical knowledge, which oscillates continually between what is held for certain and what is simply probable, and what must, later, be integrated or eliminated. The deductions and the combinations of the his- torians of economics, or of those who relate history in general, availing themselves of the guiding thread of economic phenomena, are not always so plausible or so conclusive, that one does not feel the need of saying to them : All this must be taken back and worked over. But that which is undoubted is the fact that in this present time all writing of history tends to become a science, or, better, a so- cial discipline ; and when that movement, now uncer- tain and multiform, shall be accomplished, the ef- forts of the scholars and inquirers will lead inevit- ably to the acceptance of economic materialism. By this incidence of efforts and of scientific labors, which start from points so opposite, the materialistic ccnception of all history will end by penetrating men's minds as a definite conquest of thought ; and this will finally take away from partisans and ad- versaries the attempt to speak pro and con as for partisan theses. Apart from the direct helps just enumerated, our 226 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. doctrine has many indirect helps, so that it can profitably employ the results of many disciplines, in which by reason of the greater simplicity of the re- lations, it has been possible more easily to make the application of the genetic method. The typical case is furnished by glottology, and in a more special fashion by the study which has for its object the ancient languages. The application of historical materialism is cer- tainly, hitherto, very far from that evidence and that clearness of processus of analysis and of reconstruc- tion. It would be consequently a vain attempt to try, at this moment, to write a summary of uni- versal history, which should propose to develop all the varied forms of production in order to deduce from them afterwards all the rest of human activity, in a particular and circumstantial fashion. In the present state of knowledge, he who should try to give this compendium of a new Kulturgeschichtc would do nothing but translate into economic phraseology the points of general orientation which, in other books, for example, in Hellwald, give it in Darwinian phraseology. It is a long step from the acceptance of the prin- ciple to its complete and particular application to the whole of a vast province of facts, or to a great suc- cession of phenomena. So the application of our doctrine must be kept for a moment to the exposition and the study of definite parts of history. The modern forms are clear to all. The economic developments of the HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 227 bourgeoisie, the manifest knowledge of the different obstacles which it has had to overcome in the differ- ent countries, and, consequently, the development of the different revolutions, taking this word in its broadest sense, contribute to make our understand- ing of it easy. To our eyes the pre-history of the bourgeoisie, at the moment of the decline of the Middle Ages, is equally clear, and it would not be difficult to find, for example, in the development of the city of Florence, an attested series of develop- ments, in which the economic and statistical move- ment finds a perfect correspondence in the political relations and a sufficient illustration in the contem- porary development of intelligence already reduced into prose and stripped, in great part, of ideological illusions. Nor would it be impossible to reduce, now, under the definite visual angle of materialism, the whole of ancient Roman history. But for that, and particularly for the primitive period, there are no direct sources; they are, on the contrary, abun- dant in Greece, from popular tradition, the epic, and the authentic juridical inscriptions, down to the pragmatic studies of the historical social relations. At Rome, on the other hand, the struggles for political rights carry with them almost always the economic reasons upon which they rest. Thus, the decline of definite classes, the formation of new classes, the movement of conquest, the change of the laws and of the forms of political array, appear to us with perfect clearness. This Roman history is hard and prosaic; it was never clad with these 228 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. ideological complements which were suited to Greek life. The rigid prose of conquest, of planned colon- ization, of institutions and of the forms of law, con- quered and devised for solving the problems arising from definite frictions and contrasts, makes all Roman history a chain of events which follow each other in a sequence which is grossly evident. The true problem consists, indeed, not in substi- tuting sociology for history, as if the latter had been an appearance which conceals behind it a secret reality, but in understanding history as a whole, in all its intuitive manifestations, and in understanding it through the aid of economic sociology. It is not a question of separating the accident from the sub- stance, the appearance from the reality, the phe- nomenon from the intrinsic kernel, or applying any other formula used by the partisans of any species of scholasticism, but of explaining the connection and the complexus precisely in so far as it is a con- nection and a complexus. It is not merely a ques- tion of discovering and determining the social groundwork, and then of making men appear upon it like so many marionettes, whose threads are held and moved, no longer by Providence but by economic catagories. These catagories have them- selves developed and are developing, like all the rest — because men change as to the capacity and the art of vanquishing, subduing, transforming and utilizing natural conditions ; because men change in spirit and attitude through the reaction of their HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 229 tools upon themselves ; because men change in their respective and co-associated relations ; and there- fore as individuals depending in various degrees upon one another. We have, in fine, to do with his- tory, and not with its skeleton. We are dealing with narration and not with abstraction, with the ex- plaining and treating of the whole, and not merely with resolving and analyzing it; we have to do, in a word, now, as always, with an art. It may be that the sociologist who follows the principles of economic materialism proposes to keep himself simply to the analysis, for example, of what the classes were at the moment when the French Revolution broke out, and to pass then to the classes that result from the Revolution and survive it. In that case the titles, the indications and the classifications of the materials to analyze are def- inite ; they are, for example, the city and the coun- try, the artisan and the laborer, the nobles and the serfs, the land which is freed from feudal charges, and the small proprietors who came into being, com- merce which frees itself from so many restrictions, money which accumulates, industry which prospers, etc. There is nothing to object to in the choice of this method, which, because it follows the track of embryonic origins, was indispensable to the prepara- tion of historical research according to the direction of the new doctrine.* * (I allude to the excellent work of Karl Kautsky, Die Klassengensaetze von 1789.) 230 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. But we know that the study of embryonic origins does not suffice to make us understand animal life, which is not a scheme, but is .composed of living beings which struggle, and in their struggle employ forces, instincts and passions. And it is the same, mutatis mutandis, with men also, in so far as they live historically. These particular men, moved by certain passions, urged by certain circumstances, with such and such designs, such intentions, acting in such an attempt with such an illusion of their own, or with such a deception, of another, who, martyrs of themselves or of others, enter on harsh contests and reciprocal suppressions of each other — there is the real history of the French Revolution. If, however, it is true that all history is but the unfolding of definite economic conditions, it is equally true that it develops only in definite forms of human activity, — whether the latter be passionate or reflective, fortunate or unsuccessful, blindly in- stinctive or deliberately heroic. To understand the interlacings and the complexus in its inner connection and its outer manifestations ; to descend from the surface to the foundation, and then to return from the foundation to the surface; to analyze the passions and the intentions, in their motives, from the closest to the most remote, and then to bring back the data of the passions and of the intentions and of their causes to the most re- mote elements of a definite economic situation ; there is the difficult art which the materialistic conception must realize. HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 231 And as we must not imitate that teacher who on the bank taught his pupils to swim by the definition of swimming, I beg the reader to await the examples which I shall give in other essays in a real historical narration, working over into a book which for some time I have already been doing in my teaching. In this way certain secondary and derivative questions are once for all cleared up. What, for example, is the meaning of the lives of the great men ? In these later times, answers have been given, which, in one sense or another, have an extreme character. On the one side, there are the extreme sociologists, on the other side the individualists who, after the fashion of Carlyle, put the heroes into the first rank of their history. According to some it is sufficient to show what were the reasons, for example, of Csesarism, and Caesar matters little. According to others, there are no objective reasons of classes and social interests which suffice to ex- plain anything ; it is the great minds which give the impulse to the whole historic movement; and his- tory has, so to speak, its lords and its monarchs. The empiricists of narration extract themselves from embarrassment in a very simple fashion, putting to- gether at hazard men and things, objective neces- sities of fact and subjective influences. Historical materialism goes beyond the anti- thetical views of the sociologists and the individual- ists, and at the same time it eliminates the eclectic- ism of the empirical narrators. 232 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. First of all the factum. Let this particular Caesar, as Napoleon was, be born in such a year, let him follow such a career, and find himself ready for the Eighteenth Brumaire. All this is completely accidental with relation to the general course of things which was pushing the new class, mistress of the field, to save from the Revolu- tion that which appeared to it necessary to save, and that necessitated the creation of a bureaucratico- military government. It was, however, necessary to find the man, or the men. But what actually happened came about in the fashion that we know. It depended on this fact, that it was Napoleon who directed the enterprise and not a pitiable Monk, or a ridiculous Boulanger. And from that moment the accident ceases to be accident, precisely because it is this definite person who gives his imprint and physiognomy to the events, determining the fashion or the manner in which they have unfolded. The very fact that all history rests upon anti- theses, contrasts,' struggles and wars, explains the decisive influence of certain men in definite occa- sions; These men are nejther_ji negligible accident of the social mechanism, nor miraculous creators of what society, without them, could have made in no other fashion. It is the very interfacings of the antithetic conditions, which causes the fact that definite, individuals, .generous, heroic, fortunate, mischievous, are called at critical moments to say the decisive word : As long as the particular in- terests of the different social groups are in such a HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 233 state of tension, that all the parties in the struggle reciprocally paralyze each other, then to make the political gearing move, there is need of the indi- vidual consciousness of a definite individual. The social antitheses, which make of every human community an unstable organization, give to history, especially when it is seen and examined rapidly and in its main features, the character of a drama. This drama in all its relations is repeated from com- munity to community, from nation to nation, from state to state, because the inner inequalities con- curring with the external differentiations, have pro- duced and produce the whole movement of wars, conquests, treaties, colonizations, etc. In this drama have always appeared, in the role of leaders of society, the men who are characterized as emin- ent, as great, and empiricism has concluded from their presence that they were the principal authors of history. To carry back the explanation of their appearance to the general causes and the common conditions of the social structure, is a thing which harmonizes perfectly with the data of our doctrine ; but to try to eliminate them, as certain affected objectivists of sociology would willingly do, is pure capriciousness. And to conclude, the partisan of historical ma- terialism who sets himself the task of explaining, or relating, cannot do it through schemes. History has always received a definite form, with an infinite number of accidents and variations. It 234 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. has a certain grouping, it has a certain perspective. It is not enough to have eliminated preventively the hypothesis of factors, because the narrator con- stantly finds himself in the presence of things which seem incongruous, independent, and self-directing. To present the whole as a whole, and to discover in it the continuous relations of the events which border on each other, there is the difficulty. The sum of events narrowly consecutive and pre- cise gives the whole of history ; and this is equival- ent to saying that it is all that we know of our being, in so far as we are social beings and not simply natural beings. XII. In the successive whole, and in the continuous necessity of all historical events, is there, then, some ask, any meaning, any significance? This question, whether it comes from the camp of the idealists, or whether it comes to us from the mouth of the most circumspect critics, certainly, and in all cases, demands our attention, and requires an adequate answer. In fact, if we stop at the premises, intuitive or intellectual, from which is derived the conception of progress as an idea which incloses and embraces the total of the human processus, it is seen that these presumptions all rest upon the mental need, which is in us, of attributing to one or more series of events a certain sense and a certain signification. The HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 235 conception of progress, for whoever examines it carefully in its specific nature, always implies judg- ments of estimation, and therefore, there is no one who can confuse it with the crude and bare notion of simple development, which does not contain that increment of value which makes us say of a thing that it is progressing. I have already said, and, it seems to me, at suffi- cient length, how it is that progress does not exist as something imperative or regulative over the natural and immediate succession of the generations of men. That is as intuitive as is the actual co- existence of peoples, of nations and of states, which find themselves, at the same time, in a different stage of development; so undeniable is the actual condition of relative superiority and inferiority of nation as compared with nation; and again so cer- tain is the partial and relative retrogression which has been produced several times in history, as Italy has exemplified for centuries. Still more, if there is a convincing proof of how progress must be un- derstood in the sense of immediate law, and, to use a strong expression, of a physical and inevitable law, it is precisely this fact, — that social develop- ment by the very reasons of the processus which are inherent in it, often leads to retrogression. It is evident, on the other hand, that the faculty of progressing, like the possibility of retrogressing, does not constitute, to begin with, an immediate privilege, or an innate defect of a race, nor is either 236 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. one the direct consequence of geographical condi- tions. And, in fact, the primitive centers of civiliza- tion were multiple, those centers have been removed in the course of centuries, and finally the means, the discoveries, the results and the impulses of a definite civilization, already developed, are, within certain limits, communicable to all men indefinitely. In a word, progress and retrogression are inherent in the conditions and the rhythm of social development. Now then, the faith in the universality of progress, which appeared with so much violence in the eight- eenth century, rests upon this first positive fact, that men, when they do not find obstacles in external conditions, or do not find them in those which result from their own work in their social environment, are all capable of progress. Moreover, at the bottom of this supposed or imagined unity of history, in consequence of which the processus of the different societies would form one single series of progress, there is another fact, which has offered motive and occasion for so many fantastic ideologies. If all nations have not prog- ressed equally, still more, if some have stopped and have followed a backward route, if the processus of social development has not always, in every place and in all times, the same rhythm and the same in- tensity, it is nevertheless certain that, with the pas- sage of the decisive activity from one people to an- other people in the course of history, the useful products, already acquired by those who were in HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 237 decadence, have been transmitted to those who were growing and rising. That is not so true of the products of sentiment and imagination, which never- theless are themselves preserved and perpetuated in literary tradition, as of the results of thought, and especially of the discovery and of the production of technical means, which, once found, are com- municated and transmitted directly. Need we remind the reader that writing was never lost, although the peoples who invented it have disappeared from historic continuity? Need we recall again that we all have in our pockets, en- graved on our watches, the Babylonian dial, and that we make use of algebra, which was introduced by those Arabs, whose historical activity has since been dispersed like the sands of the desert? It is useless to multiply these examples, because it is sufficient to think of technology and the history of discoveries in the broad sense of the word, for which the almost continuous transmission of the instru- ments of labor and production is evident. And after all, the provisional summaries which are called universal histories, although they always reveal, in their aim and in their execution, some- thing forced and artificial, would never have been attempted if human events had not offered to the empiricism of the narrators a certain thread, even though subtle, of continuity. Take for example the Italy of the sixteenth cen- tury, which is evidently in decadence ; but while it is declining, it transmits to the rest of Europe its 238 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. intellectual weapons. These are not all that pass to the civilization which continues, but even the . world market establishes itself upon the foundation of those geographical discoveries, and those discov- eries in the naval art, which were the work of Italian merchants, travelers and sailors. It is not only the methods of the art of war and the refinements of political diplomacy which passed outside of Italy (though it is only with these that men of letters ordinarily concerned themselves), but even the art of making money, which had acquired all the evi- dence of an elaborate commercial discipline, and one after the other the rudiments of the science, upon which is founded modern technique, and to begin with all the methodical irrigation of fields and the general laws of hydraulics. All that is so precisely true, that an amateur in conjectural theses might come to the point of asking himself this question : what would have become of Italy, in this modern bourgeois epoch, if, executing the project of the Venetian Senate (1504) of making something which would have resembled in its effects a piercing of the Isthmus of Suez, the Italian navy had found itself in a direct struggle with the Portuguese in the Indian Ocean, at the very moment when the shifting of historical activity from the Mediter- ranean to the ocean prepared the decadence of Italy ? But enough of fantasy ! A certain historical continuity, in the empirical and circumstantial sense of the transmission and the HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 239 successive increase of the means of civilization, is then an incontestable fact. And, although this fact excludes all idea of preconceived design, of inten- tional or hidden finality, or pre-established harmony, and all the other whimsicalities in regard to which there has been such a deal of speculation, it does not exclude, for all that, the idea of progress, which we can utilize as an estimation of the course of human development. It is undeniable that progress does not embrace materially the succession of gen- erations, and that its conception implies nothing categorical, considering that societies have also been in retrogression, but that does not prevent this idea from serving as a guiding thread and a measure to give a meaning to the historical processus. There is no common ground for critics who are .prudent, in the use of specific concepts as in the method of their application, and those poor extreme evolu- tionists, who are scientists without the grammar and the principle of science, that is to say, without logic. As I have said several times, ideas do not fall from heaven, and even those which, at a given mo- ment arise from definite situations with the im- petuosity of faith and with a metaphysical garb, carry always within themselves the index of their correspondence with the order of the facts, of which the explanation is sought or attempted. The idea of progress, as the unifier of history, appears with violence and becomes a giant in the eighteenth cen- tury, that is to say, in the heroic period of the in- tellectual and political life of the revolutionary 240 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. bourgeoisie. Just as this engendered, in the order of its works, the most intensive period of history that is known, it also produced its own ideology in the notion of progress. This ideology in its sub- stance means that capitalism is the only form of production which is capable of extending all over the earth and of reducing the whole human race to conditions which resemble each other everywhere. If modern technique can be transported everywhere, if all the human race appear on a single field of com- petition and all the world as a single market, what is there astonishing in the ideology which, reflecting intellectually these conditions of fact, reaches the affirmation that the present historical unity has been prepared by everything which precedes it? Trans- lating this concept of pretended preparation into the altogether natural concept of successive condition, and there is opened before us the road by which the passage is made from the ideology of progress to historical materialism ; and now we arrive at the affirmation of Marx, that this form of bourgeois production is the last antagonistic form of the processus of society. The miracles of the bourgeois epoch, in the uni- fication of the social processus, find no parallel in the past. Here are the whole New World, Australia, Northern Africa, and New Zealand! And they all resemble us ! And the rebound in the extreme East is made through imitation, and in Africa through conquest ! In the presence of this universality and this cosmopolitanism, the acquisition of the Celts HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 211 and the Iberians to Roman civilization, and of the Germans and that the Slavs to the cycle of Roman Byzantine Christian civilization shrink into insig- nificance. This ever-growing unification is reflected more every day in the political mechanism of Eu- rope ; this mechanism, because founded on the econ- omic conquest of the other parts of the world, oscil- lates henceforth with the flux and reflux which come from the most distant regions. In this most com- plicated mingling of action and reactions the war between Japan and China, made with methods imi- tated, or directly borrowed, from European tech- nique, leaves its traces, deep and far-reaching, in the diplomatic relations of Europe, and still clearer traces in the stock exchange, which is the faithful interpreter of the consciousness of our time. This Europe, mistress of all the rest of the world, has recently seen the relations of the politics of the states of which it is composed oscillate in consequence of a revolt in the Transvaal, and in consequence of the ill success of the Italian armies in Abyssinia in these last days.* The centuries which have prepared and carried to its present form the economic domination of bour- geois production have also developed the tendency to a unification of history under a general view; and in this fashion we find explained and justified the ideology of progress, which fills so many books of the philosophy of history and of Kultur- geschichte. The unity of social form, that is to say, ♦The Italian edition of this Essay bears the date of March 10, 1896. 242 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. the unity of the capitalistic form of production, to which the bourgeoisie has tended for centuries, is reflected in the conception of the unity of history in more suggestive forms than the mind could ever have received from the narrow cosmopolitanism of the Roman empire or the one-sided cosmopolitai«/'3m of the Catholic Church. But this unification of the social life, by the work- ing of the capitalist form of production, developed itself from the beginning, and continues to develop itself, not according to preconceived rules, plans and designs, but, on the contrary, by reason of fric- tions and struggles, which in their sum form a co- lossal complication of antitheses. War without and war within. Struggle incessant among the nations, and struggles incessant between the members of each nation. And the interlacings of the deeds and the action of so many emulators, competitors and adversaries is so complicated, that the co-ordination of events very often escapes the attention, and it is a very difficult thing to discover their intimate con- nection. The struggle which actually exists among men, the struggles which now, with various meth- ods, are unfolding among nations and within na- tions, have come to make us understand better in the midst of what difficulties the history of the past has unfolded. If the bourgeois ideology, reflecting the tendency to capitalist unification, has proclaimed the progress of the human race, historical material- ism, on the contrary, and without proclam ition, has HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 243 discovered that these are the antitheses which have thus far been the cause and the motive of all histori- cal events. Thus the movement of history, taken in general, appears to us as it were oscillating; — or rather, to use a more appropriate image, it seems that it is un- folding on a line often interrupted, and at certain moments it seems to return upon itself, sometimes it stretches out, removing itself far from the point of departure: — in an actual zigzag. Granted the internal complication of every society, and granted the meeting of several societies on the field of competition (from the ingenuous forms of robbery, rapine and piracy to the refined methods of the elegant sport of the stock exchange) it is natural that every historical result, when it is measured in the one measure of individual expectation, appears very often like chance, and afterwards, considered theoretically, becomes for the mind more inextric- able than the track of meteors. Speaking of the irony which sits as a sovereign above history is not a simple phrase ; because, in truth, if there is no god of Epicurus laughing above over human affairs, here below human affairs are of themselves playing a divine comedy. Will this irony of human destinies ever cease? Will that form of association ever be possible which gives room for the possible complete development of all aptitudes, in such a way that the ulterior pro- cessus of history may become a real and true evolu- tion? And, to speak like the amateurs of high- 244 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. sounding phrases, will there ever be a humanization of all men ? When once in the communism of pro- duction the antitheses which are now the cause and the effect of economic differentiations are eliminated, will not all human energies acquire a very high de- gree of efficacy and intensity in co-operative effects, and at the same time will they not develop with a greater liberty of self-expression among all indi- viduals ? It is in the affirmative answers to these questions that consists what critical communism says, that is to say foresees, of the future. But it does not say it and it does not foretell it as if it were discussing an abstract possibility, or like him who wishes, by his will, to give life to a state of things which he desires and which he dreams. But it says and pre- dicts because what it announces must inevitably hap- pen by the immanent necessity of history, seen and studied henceforth in the foundation of its economic substructure. "It is only in an order of things where there will no longer be classes and class antagonisms that social revolutions will cease to be political revolutions.* "To the old bourgeois society with its classes and class antagonisms will succeed an association in which the free development of each is the condition of the free development of all.t "The relations of bourgeois production are the last antagonistic form of the social processus of * Marx, Misere de la Philosophie, Paris, 1817, p. 178. t Communist Manifesto, p. 16. HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. 245 production — a form antagonistic not in the sense of individual antagonism, but of the antagonism which proceeds from the conditions of the social life of individuals; but the productive forces which are developing in the lap of bourgeois society are creat- ing at the same time the material conditions to ter- minate that antagonism. With this social organiza- tion ends the prehistory of the human race.* "With the taking possession of the means of pro- duction on the part of society, is excluded the pro- duction of commodities, and with it the dominance of the product over the producer. The anarchy which dominates in social production will be succeeded by conscious organization. The struggle for individual existence will cease. Only in this way man will de- tach himself, in a certain sense, from the animal world in a definite fashion, and will pass from a condition of animal existence to conditions of hu- man existence. The entire sum of the conditions of life which has thus far dominated men will pass under the rule and the examination of men them- selves, who will thus for the first time become the real masters of nature, because they will be the mas- ters of their own association. The laws of their own social activity, which had been outside of them like foreign laws imposed upon them, will be ap- plied and mastered by the men themselves, with full knowledge of their cause. Their very association, which appeared to men as if imposed by nature and history, will become their own and their free work. * Marx, Zur Kritik der politischen Oekonomie, Ber- lin, 1859, p. 6 Pref. Compare my first Essay, pp. 48-50. 246 HISTORICAL MATERIALISM** The foreign and objective forces, which till then dominated history, will pass under the care of men. Only from that moment will men make their own history with full understanding; only from that moment will the social causes which they put in motion, be able to arrive, in great part and in a proportion ever increasing, at the desired effects. It is the leap of the human race from the reign of necessity into that of liberty. To accomplish this action emancipating the world, such is the historic mission of the modern proletariat." If Marx and Engels had been phrasemakers, if their spirit had not been made prudent, even scrupu- lous, by the daily and minute use and application of scientific methods, if the permanent contact with so many conspirators and visionaries had not given them a horror of every Utopia, opposing it indeed up to the point of pedantry, these formulas might pass for good-natured paradoxes, which criticism need not examine. But these formulas are, as it were, the close, the effective conclusion of the doctrine of his- toric materialism. They are the direct result of the criticism of economies and of historical dialectics. In these formulas, which may be developed, as I have had occasion to show elsewhere, is summed up every forecast of the future, which is not and is not intended for a romance or a Utopia. And in these very formulas there is an adequate and con j elusive response to the question with which thii chapter began: Is there in the series of historic events a meaning and a significance? THE END.